[20:59] <seb128> hey there
[20:59] <seb128> the ddeb archive is handled by launchpad nowadays?
[20:59] <seb128> any idea why the libgtk-3-0-dbgsym from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/3.24.23-1ubuntu1.1/+build/20248124 isn't showing up in apt?


[06:07] <fuzzybunny69y> hey everyone I am not sure if this is the place to be asking this but when I add the indicator applet to my panel, for some reason it includes the time. Is there anyway to get it so that it just has the little indicator envelope. I already have the time wth the weather in another part of the panel
[13:55] <dieki> The wiki page for app indicators states that it is possible to put a Label instead of an icon in an app indicator, but it doesn't say how to do that. How do I do that?
[13:57] <dieki> Also, is it possible to specify the position of the appindicator? I'm creating an indicator for the current weather, and so it would be best if it could always be posisitioned in the second place, next to indicator-datetime.
[13:59] <tedg> dieki, Both of those features are planned for the Maverick cycle, but they aren't done yet.
[14:00] <dieki> Alright.
[14:01] <dieki> I suppose my indicator for weather isn't needed until then anyway.
[14:01] <dieki> Thanks.


[00:34] <rfm> ladeda, not "coming up before it's actually configured" because it's up and configured with at least the link-local address, but it doesn't have your v4 IP address yet.  "configuring" isn't a unitary thing anymore (if it ever was).  And it's not netplan doing it, it's networkd (following instructions laid down by netplan.)


[01:10] <user|45538> hello
[01:11] <user|45538> can I reinstall windows on my pc after wiping the drive and installing kubuntu
[01:12] <user|45538> and how can I I really need help
[01:13] <user|45538> please I need to reinstall windows after installing kubuntu
[01:13] <krytarik> !grub | user|45538
[01:14] <user|45538> I need windows
[01:14] <user|45538> PLEASE
[01:14] <user|45538> HELLO
[01:14] <user|45538> I REALY NEED HELP
[01:15] <krytarik> user|45538: ...Seriously?
[01:15] <user|45538> YES
[01:16] <OerHeks> all guides say: install windows first ..
[01:24] <wardred> You'll need a restore partition or install media for Windows.  Not a lot can be done if you destroyed all the Windows partitions and overwrote them.
[01:25] <wardred> You might be able to get install media from your vendor, Dell or whoever made your PC, but it usually takes a while to ship the media.
[01:25] <wardred> And may not be free.
[01:30] <tomreyn> loooong gone
[01:31] <wardred> Whoops.  Saw the reconnect, missed the re-disconnect.  Ah well.
[06:51] <yazu> \quit
[07:13] <lordievader> Good morning
[07:44] <wwishgril> Hi Guys.
[07:44] <wwishgril> Vagina Loves Foreskin Gliding [ https://www.bitchute.com/video/LaPsv463Whzw/ ]
[11:23] <user|50219> im currently on kubuntu 18.04, is it possible to upgrade to 18.10 without reinstalling everything?
[11:23] <user|50219> (silly question. i know)
[11:26] <Captain_Haddock> user|50219: What do you mean by "reinstalling everything"?
[11:27] <user|50219> whats the upgrade path?
[11:27] <user|50219> is it better to just wipe my drive and install 18.10 clean?
[11:27] <user|50219> or is it possible to do an upgrade without it causing any issues?
[11:27] <Captain_Haddock> It is always better to do that. But the upgrade process is reasonably simple.
[11:28] <user|50219> does 18.10 have better high DPI display support?
[11:28] <user|50219> I'm using a 4K monitor, and some things aren't scaling very well
[11:28] <Captain_Haddock> It's possible that some software that you installed yourself using a third party repository won't have a clean upgrade path. But the upgrader will usually either disable third party repos or let you know if there's a problem.
[11:29] <Captain_Haddock> I have no idea. But that might be a driver issue.
[11:29] <user|50219> okay, cheers
 Anybody got this error indicatorappletcompletefactory::indicatorappletcomplete i run it as a ltsp on kubuntu
 (Photo, 1280x960) https://irc-attachments.kde.org/QNDhlFrP/file_13603.jpg
[12:01] <Th3Mafia> I installed 18.10 Ubuntu then installed KDE on top of it.  Does anyone know how to fix this? Currently on 18.04.2
[13:41] <diogenes_> dwinchester_, when first this problem occured?
[13:44] <dwinchester_> Since installing the OS. I think it might be related to Nvidia drivers?
[13:45] <diogenes_> well, when you first install the OS, there is no nvidia driver pre-installed
[13:46] <Captain_Haddock> dwinchester_: What happens when you try placing the system into sleep mode?
[13:47] <dwinchester_> It goes to sleep, but monitors won't wake up
[13:48] <dwinchester_> diogenes_: I don't know if it was since first installing the OS or not. I installed Nvidia drivers like right away.
[13:49] <diogenes_> then reboot
[13:49] <diogenes_> after driver installation you must reboot
[13:49] <dwinchester_> I've done that since then... Lol
[13:49] <dwinchester_> This has been an issue for about 2 weeks now
[13:50] <diogenes_> try in terminal: systemctl poweroff
[13:50] <dwinchester_> Okay, I've been doing `shutdown now`
[13:50] <diogenes_> it's not the same
[13:51] <dwinchester_> I'm currently at work, but I'll try that when I get home.
[13:51] <diogenes_> heh ok
[13:51] <dwinchester_> I have the other issue with the monitors not waking up after I suspend the system
[13:52] <dwinchester_> Also if I turn on the PC and then the monitors the monitors will never pick up the signal. I have to turn on the monitors and then the PC for them to display anything. Seems related to the suspend issue.
[14:05] <Admiral[m]> I have the same issues as dwinchester_
[14:06] <Admiral[m]> Sometimes it shuts down
[14:06] <Admiral[m]> Sometimes I open the lid and it's still stuck in the lock screen
[14:06] <dwinchester_> I'm on desktop though, not a laptop. Not sure if that matters.
[14:06] <Admiral[m]> When I enter my password, it unlocks then shutdown
[14:06] <Admiral[m]> Unpredictable
[14:07] <dwinchester_> Mine isn't lock screen though. It's literally that first screen you see that says "kununtu" when the system is initially booting
[14:07] <Tharx_> how i do change the<EMAIL_ADDRESS>to MyName/whatever/whatever
[14:07] <Tharx_> Please help me
[14:08] <Admiral[m]> Do you want to just change the name or the device itself Tharx_?
[14:09] <Admiral[m]> I meant username or computer name?
[14:09] <Tharx_> My NickName is Tharx_, but you hover mi name in the list name floaat right
[14:10] <Captain_Haddock> Tharx_: Ask in #freenode
[14:10] <Tharx_> U can see my IP Direction
[14:10] <Tharx_> Ok
[14:57] <BluesKaj_> Hiyas all
[16:02] <EvilRoey> hi
[16:02] <EvilRoey> why does SUDO take so...long...to work?  like..10-15 seconds.  Ichecked /etc/hosts, /etc/resolv.conf /etc/sudoers and they all seem fine though
[16:02] <EvilRoey> BluesKaj: hi! ^
[16:04] <BluesKaj> hi , thode files don't affect sudo, EvilRoey:
[16:06] <BluesKaj> those
[16:06] <EvilRoey> ok, then how can i diagnose this issu?
[16:08] <BluesKaj>  /etc/sudoers might , did you edit it somehow?
[16:09] <BluesKaj> best to use sudo visudo in the terminal to have a look
[16:10] <EvilRoey> sure
[16:10] <EvilRoey> there's nothing edited there.
[16:10] <EvilRoey> it's pristine.
[16:12] <BluesKaj> are you the only user?
[16:16] <BluesKaj> sudo su, then, adduser yourusername sudo
[16:18] <Captain_Haddock> What happens when you run the command from a root shell?
[16:19] <Captain_Haddock> You could also see via htop if something is hogging the CPU or similar.
[16:19] <Captain_Haddock> (in tandem)
[16:23] <BluesKaj> he solved by rebooting
[16:23] <BluesKaj> crossposting #ubvuntu
[16:23] <BluesKaj> err #ubuntu
[18:26] <Captain_Haddock> OK :)
[18:44] <user|54719> are there parental controls available with Kubuntu?
[20:17] <forsamori> o7
[23:55] <dwinchester_> I just noticed that my Emacs version is 25.2.2 is there a reason the Kubuntu 18.04.02 repos don't have 26.1?


[04:26] <mup> Bug #1408875 changed: Uefi pxe boot can't written to the drive by fast installer using MAAS 1.5.4 <MAAS:Expired> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1408875>


[00:38] <bandit-led> any work arounds for initramfs kmod error bug 1073062
[00:42] <Guest92538> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1102660 I am having frequent hard lock ups on Raring with the latest updates. Can someone look at the logs and see if this is kernel or Xorg related? Thanks!
[00:59] <MikeRL> Anyone available for assistance? Take your time.
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> MikeRL, you should just post your question in channel rather than depend on one person to help you.
[01:04] <TheLordOfTime> and then wait once you've asked.
[01:05] <MikeRL> Oops sorry.
[01:05] <MikeRL> So,how do I post the question in the channel?
[01:06] <TheLordOfTime> just like you asked a question now :P
[01:06] <TheLordOfTime> you just ask your question and then hit enter and wait
[01:07] <MikeRL> OK. How long should I give it? Half hour? Hour?
[01:07] <MikeRL> I know I can set the IRC client to make a noise when a response happens.
[01:08] <MikeRL> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1102660
[01:08] <MikeRL> This is what I'm talking about. I am having frequent hard lock ups on Raring with the latest updates. Can someone look at the logs and see if this is kernel or Xorg related? Any help is appreciated.
[06:07] <serp_> sup
[06:07] <kittenmittens> hello ubuntu 12.4 and 12.10 hate me, is it possible that 12 will work better?
[06:07] <kittenmittens> 13**
[06:08] <TheLordOfTime> kittenmittens, define "hate you"
[06:08] <bjsnider> operating systems don't have emotions
[06:08] <bjsnider> yet
[06:08] <serp_> not other than hatred
[06:09] <kittenmittens> 12 .10 on my pc crashes after i install and will never start agaian.. i have to reinstall
[06:09] <kittenmittens> and on my laptop i get a read only filesystem error on 12.04 , after updating
[06:10] <kittenmittens> ive spent weeks trying to fix, asking for help and ect, hardware is overconfirmed fine, and download and installed via usb and cd too many times
[06:10] <kittenmittens> so ya, they hate me
[06:14] <kittenmittens> sooo?
[06:22] <kittenmittens> how do i install 13.04
[06:30] <turgay> kittenmittens:  http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/  13.04 daily builds
[07:00] <kittenmittens> awww, just watched the last episode of the guild and it made me cry
[08:11] <baronos> Guys, let's remove rhythmbox  for a stupid design in the next release, and include  deadbeef example?
[08:12] <gnomefreak> baronos: you need to file a wish list bug.file the bug and i will mark it as wishlist if you cant
[08:13] <gnomefreak> but i doubt it will happen at this time though
[09:04] <gnomefreak> anyone else getting a seahorse dialog box to type in password once loged into gnome? i have it set up to skip login screen
[09:32] <kittenmittens> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fP4emqw7O4
[09:35] <gnomefreak> kittenmittens: please keep this channel for suppport on Ubuntu13.04, please join #ubuntu-offtopic to post non-support convo
[10:01] <gnomefreak> how do i get the window controls on the right hand side of window. the t~fix for 12.10 doesnt work in 13.04
[10:01] <amoma> instal debian
[10:21] <xkernel> is there a channel for Ubuntu development support?
[11:05] <yofel> xkernel: define development support?
[11:05] <yofel> #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-motu usually
[11:16] <xkernel> yofel, for building packages, solving ubuntu code bugs etc..
[11:35] <yofel> xkernel: -motu usually, though there's #ubuntu-packaging for packaging help too
[11:35] <xkernel> thanks yofel
[11:50] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[14:38] <dholbach> Day 2 of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDeveloperWeek starts in 22 minutes in #ubuntu-classroom
[16:12] <Tribaal> hi all! startx dies for me at startup since last upgrade - what can I do to help?
[16:15] <Tribaal> soory, I mean since http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1589997/
[16:31] <BluesKaj> Tribaal, you used sudo I hope ..do you get any erroros when starting X ?
[16:34] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: unfortunately yes, and let me dig for the logs
[16:41] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1590073/
[16:41] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: that means lightdm does not start on boot
[16:44] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: I get  a symbol lookup error in x-0-greeter.log, but that's the only suspicious thing in the lightdm logs
[16:50] <BluesKaj> Tribaal, yeah , have you tried thr nomodeset option in the grub line after "quiet splash " ?
[16:50] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: not yet - trying
[16:52] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: exact same (after a sudo update-grub of course)
[16:53] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: I get the Ubuntu loading screen - but not the login
[16:54] <BluesKaj> Tribaal, can you get to tty ?
[16:54] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: yes
[16:55] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: network is up, everything seems fine except for the absence of X :)
[16:56] <BluesKaj> ok , what graphics card and driver? , glxinfo | grep OpenGL
[16:56] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: glxinfo can't open the display
[16:56] <BluesKaj> you may have to install mesa-utils for that command to give you any info
[16:57] <Tribaal> I get, precisely: "Error: unable to open display"
[16:57] <Tribaal> Graphics car is an intel HD 4000
[16:58] <Tribaal> s/car/card/
[17:02] <Tribaal> Ah well maybe it's just time for me to reinstall
[17:05] <BluesKaj> Tribaal, sudo modprobe i915 ..if there's no output then the driver loaded
[17:06] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: it is
[17:06] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: (no output)
[17:06] <BluesKaj> ok try startx
[17:07] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: I get the same output as before
[17:07] <BluesKaj> Tribaal, hqave you done an update/upgrade lately ?
[17:08] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: it booted fine, then I updated: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1589997/ then it stopped starting it at boot
[17:09] <BluesKaj> bummer :(
[17:09] <BluesKaj> I have to go for a few mins ...bbl
[17:10] <Tribaal> BluesKaj: is there such athing as xdiagnose for the command line?
[17:25] <mibofra_smart> hi
[17:28] <mibofra_smart> After today upadate , I can't start lightdm . If try with lightdm-session , the error this time is : "x-session-manager: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0: undefined symbol: wl_registry_interface
[17:29] <mibofra_smart> what should I do ?
[17:32] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: ohh so I'm not alone :)
[17:32] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: intel graphics card as well?
[17:33] <mibofra_smart> yes :D .
[17:33] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: where do you see the error? What log file?
[17:34] <mibofra_smart> but I've had this problem with natty , oneiric , precise and quantal dev branch ; but now I can't fix it XD .
[17:35] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: did you open a bug repot already or should I?
[17:35] <mibofra_smart> I saw the error with : sudo lightdm-session command .
[17:42] <mibofra_smart> Tribal: have you got the same problem :)) ?
[17:42] <mibofra_smart> *Tribaal
[17:47] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: yes, same problem
[17:48] <mibofra_smart> so we can't solve :D ?
[17:49] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: I don't know. I will open a bug first
[17:49] <mibofra_smart> I think so too .
[18:03] <Tribaal> ok, I opened a bug for that https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1110645
[18:06] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1110645
[18:06] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: if you feel you should chip in :) Maybe you should +1 it ("this bug affects me too")
[18:07] <mibofra_smart> Tribaal : I know that :) .
[18:07] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: sure - just making sure :)
[18:07] <mibofra_smart> :) ok .
[18:25] <mibofra_smart> Tribaal: the link of the bug onto the launchpad ?
[18:37] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1110645
[18:37] <mibofra_smart> thanks :)
[18:40] <Tribaal> hum invalid
[18:43] <Tribaal> oh maybe it's due to the qt5 ppa
[18:43] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: did you install the ubuntu phone SDK by any chance?
[18:44] <mibofra_smart> I've installed it . But a minute , your machine is a 64bit ; my machine is a 32bit
[18:44] <mibofra_smart> .
[18:45] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: probably doesn't make a difference - the libgdk version we both have is different from the one vanilla Ubuntu expects
[18:48] <mibofra_smart> yes , I know . Maybe I've to try to install the vanilla one .
[18:50] <mibofra_smart> I've x edgers team ppa :D .
[18:58] <Tribaal> mibofra_smart: downgrading libwayland0 to 1.0.3-0ubuntu2 saolved the lightdm problem for me (but apparently I need more stuff downgraded)
[19:23] <mibofra_smart> Tribaal: Me too :) .
[19:24] <mibofra_smart> yes , downgraded lightdm-* packages too .
[20:32] <Tribaal> mibofa_smart: did that fix the problem for you?
[23:15] <em> do any of you know if ubuntu 12.04 is the LTS server?
[23:17] <Ben64> !12.04
[23:18] <em> thanks
[23:22] <em> Ben64: what version of python is in 12.04 server?
[23:23] <TheLordOfTime> !info python 12.04
[23:23] <yofel> em: 2.7.3 and 3.2.3
[23:23] <TheLordOfTime> !info python precise
[23:23] <Ben64> em: join #ubuntu for 12.04
[23:23] <TheLordOfTime> its default 2.7.3 though i think
[23:23] <Ben64> this is for 13.04
[23:23] <TheLordOfTime> and /join #ubuntu for 12.04 as Ben said
[23:23] <em> Unfortunately I cannot join #ubuntu
[23:24] <em> yofel: so thanks :)


[00:01] <vorlon> infinity, cjwatson: sorry, I don't have any context for that auto-sync cowboy; I don't remember making the change and I don't see any discussion about auto-sync in IRC logs from that time
[00:10] <infinity> vorlon: Exciting.
[00:10] <infinity> Well, it's been like that long enough that maybe the answer is just to commit it without context. :P
[01:45] <vorlon> infinity: or revert it, because in all this time there have been no emails indicating output from auto-sync to stdout
[02:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.0.0-0ubuntu4+gitde67dcb] (ubuntustudio)
[02:14] <Eickmeyer> ^ For an SRU (bug 1849168)
[02:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.0.0-0ubuntu4+gitde67dcb] (ubuntustudio)
[02:15] <Eickmeyer> ^ Same package, but for focal.
[02:20] <infinity> Eickmeyer: You can't upload the same version to both.
[02:20] <infinity> Eickmeyer: Which one do you want me to reject?
[02:21] <Eickmeyer> infinity: reject focal then. I can bump the verison for focal upload (a no-change upload).
[02:22] <infinity> Eickmeyer: Rejected.
[02:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected carla [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu4+gitde67dcb]
[02:23] <Eickmeyer> infinity: thanks
[02:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.0.0-0ubuntu5+gitde67dcb] (ubuntustudio)
[02:30] <Eickmeyer> infinity: There's the different version ^
[05:49] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, i'm retrying amd64 and ppc64el autopkgests, since queues are empty
[08:04] <Laney> vorlon: I mean if someone wants to implement an explicit expiry procedure, that's fine - but otherwise I think that saying that you get your results for (strawman) 90 days is also totally acceptable.
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (focal-proposed/main) [1.427 => 1.428] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (eoan-proposed/main) [3.34.0-1ubuntu2 => 3.34.2-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pytables (focal-proposed/universe) [3.5.2-3ubuntu1 => 3.5.2-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pytables [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5.2-3ubuntu2]
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.40.8-0ubuntu1 => 0.40.17-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2.3.0-0ubuntu3.3 => 2.3.0-0ubuntu3.4] (core)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-67.76] (core, kernel)
[12:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-67.76] (core, kernel)
[12:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (eoan-proposed/main) [1.183 => 1.183.1] (core, kernel)
[12:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-67.76]
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-67.76]
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-33.35] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-33.35] (core, kernel)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-33.35] (core, kernel)
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-33.35]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-33.35]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-33.35]
[13:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (focal-proposed) [1.428]
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1062.67] (kernel)
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ibus-avro to personal-gunnarhj in bionic
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ibus-avro to personal-gunnarhj in disco
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ibus-avro to personal-gunnarhj in eoan
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ibus-avro to personal-gunnarhj in focal
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ibus-avro to personal-gunnarhj in xenial
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-1062.67]
[14:06] <tkamppeter> Can you have a look at bug 1754671?
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-importlib-metadata (focal-proposed/universe) [0.23-0ubuntu1 => 0.23-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:08] <tkamppeter> Here there was originally uploaded network-manager 1.10.14 as SRU to fix this (and other) bugs in Bionic's 1.10.6. Regressions were reported and so an alternative SRU backporting upstream fixes into 1.10.6 was suggested.
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-167.196] (core, kernel)
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1 => 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-167.196]
[14:09] <tkamppeter> How to proceed to replace the 1.10.14 currently in bionic-proposed by the new 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2 SRU?
[14:12] <oSoMoN> release team: can you please reject chromium-browser from the eoan-proposed queue? I got the version number wrong, will re-upload later with it fixed
[14:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1 => 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:14] <seb128> oSoMoN, rejected
[14:14] <oSoMoN> thanks!
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (eoan-proposed) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap2]
[14:17] <oSoMoN> seb128, mind rejecting my chromium-browser upload for focal, too? that ~snap2 suffix is not gonna fly :/
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1 => 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (eoan-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1 => 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:26] <didrocks> oSoMoN: flushed
[14:27] <oSoMoN> didrocks, thanks
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap2]
[14:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu2]
[14:34] <seb128> oSoMoN, sorry, looks like we conflicted action with Didier and the non snap version got rejected as a result as well
[14:34] <oSoMoN> seb128, no worries, if I upload again it will be picked up, right?
[14:34] <oSoMoN> or do I need to bump again the version
[14:34] <oSoMoN> ?
[14:35] <seb128> no, just dput again the same
[14:36] <seb128> or I think it could be archive copied back to accepted, but not be put to unapproved
[14:36] <oSoMoN> ok, done
[14:37] <oSoMoN> feel free to accept :)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu1~snap1 => 77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chromium-browser [source] (focal-proposed) [77.0.3865.120-0ubuntu2]
[14:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-importlib-metadata [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.23-2]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.183.1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (focal-proposed/universe) [3.11.1+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 3.11.1+dfsg-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.11.1+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 3.11.1+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: opencryptoki (disco-proposed/universe) [3.11.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 3.11.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2.1] (no packageset)
[17:22] <dax> What's the timeline for do-release-upgrade offering eoan? Trying to figure out how to word some IRC support factoids.
[17:24] <dax> (as per usual, people are being impatient in #ubuntu, so trying to standardize the response a bit)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pandas (focal-proposed/universe) [0.23.3+dfsg-4ubuntu4 => 0.23.3+dfsg-4ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pandas [source] (focal-proposed) [0.23.3+dfsg-4ubuntu5]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adios (focal-proposed/universe) [1.13.1-19 => 1.13.1-19build1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fiona (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.6-2 => 1.8.6-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gpyfft (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-1build2 => 0.7.0-1build3] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lqa (focal-proposed/universe) [20180702.0-1build1 => 20180702.0-1build2] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cypari2 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-1 => 2.1.1-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: htseq (focal-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-1 => 0.11.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fpylll (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.1+ds1-5 => 0.4.1+ds1-5build1] (no packageset)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mpi4py-fft (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.3-3 => 2.0.3-3build1] (no packageset)
[17:44] <dax> oh, meta-release looks different. guess that answers that :)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pdal (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-2 => 1.9.1+ds-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyosmium (focal-proposed/universe) [2.15.3-1 => 2.15.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pytango (focal-proposed/universe) [9.2.5-1 => 9.2.5-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-falcon (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1 => 1.4.1-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pybedtools (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-2 => 0.8.0-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qgis (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.10+dfsg-1build1 => 3.4.10+dfsg-1build2] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: reprozip (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.14-2 => 1.0.14-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scikit-learn (focal-proposed/universe) [0.20.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 0.20.3+dfsg-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spglib (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.1-2 => 1.14.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pplpy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8.4-2 => 0.8.4-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cobra (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-2 => 0.14.2-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyzmq (focal-proposed/universe) [17.1.2-3ubuntu1 => 17.1.2-3ubuntu2] (ubuntustudio)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: samba (focal-proposed/main) [2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu2 => 2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3] (core)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yarl (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyside (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2+source1-3build3 => 1.2.2+source1-3build4] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rasterio (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.25-1 => 1.0.25-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-preshed (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1 => 2.0.1-1build1] (no packageset)
[17:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: skimage (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.2-2 => 0.14.2-2build1] (no packageset)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adios [source] (focal-proposed) [1.13.1-19build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fiona [source] (focal-proposed) [1.8.6-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gpyfft [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.0-1build3]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lqa [source] (focal-proposed) [20180702.0-1build2]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pdal [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.1+ds-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyosmium [source] (focal-proposed) [2.15.3-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pytango [source] (focal-proposed) [9.2.5-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-falcon [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.1-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pybedtools [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.0-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qgis [source] (focal-proposed) [3.4.10+dfsg-1build2]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cypari2 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1.1-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted htseq [source] (focal-proposed) [0.11.2-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pplpy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.4-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cobra [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyzmq [source] (focal-proposed) [17.1.2-3ubuntu2]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted reprozip [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.14-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted scikit-learn [source] (focal-proposed) [0.20.3+dfsg-0ubuntu3]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spglib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14.1-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cdo (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4 => 1.9.8~rc2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: csync2 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0-8-g175a01c-4ubuntu2 => 2.0-22-gce67c55-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fpylll [source] (focal-proposed) [0.4.1+ds1-5build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyside [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2+source1-3build4]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rasterio [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.25-1build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted skimage [source] (focal-proposed) [0.14.2-2build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cron (focal-proposed/main) [3.0pl1-134ubuntu1 => 3.0pl1-135ubuntu1] (core)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freecad (focal-proposed/universe) [0.18.3+dfsg1-1 => 0.18.3+dfsg1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdal (focal-proposed/universe) [2.4.2+dfsg-1build4 => 2.4.2+dfsg-2] (kubuntu) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgeotiff (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-2 => 1.5.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-monasca-statsd (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.11.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mpi4py-fft [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-3build1]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted samba [source] (focal-proposed) [2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cwltool (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.20190815141648+dfsg-1ubuntu2 => 1.0.20190915164430+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grass (focal-proposed/universe) [7.6.1-3build1 => 7.8.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-preshed [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.1-1build1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gammaray (focal-proposed/universe) [2.9.0-2.1ubuntu3 => 2.11.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yarl [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-1build1]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pspp (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-2ubuntu2 => 1.2.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:48] <tomreyn> thanks for the feedback 24h ago, infin1ty (trying not to highlight). also i notice bdmurr4y is back and the 19.10 upgrade path is now enabled. :)
[17:50] <dax> oh, i didn't see the conversation yesterday, thanks tomreyn
[17:53] <tomreyn> dax: i didn't do anything other than talking, but if this helped, i'm happy.  ;)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gdb (bionic-proposed/main) [8.1-0ubuntu3.1 => 8.1-0ubuntu3.2] (core)
[17:54] <dax> i meant thanks for pointing it out, but that interpretation is fine too :P
[17:54]  * dax scuttles back into the shadows to avoid being more annoying to the release folks than necessary
[17:59] <vorlon> Laney: autopkgtest web results seem to not be updating for focal, e.g. http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/3/389-ds-base/focal/armhf - there are newer test runs on the 18th that are not reflected here.  Does something else need kicked?
[18:01] <Laney> oooooooooooooooooooohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
[18:01] <Laney> I might hve forgotten to uncomment download-results
[18:01] <vorlon> ack
[18:01] <Laney> #*/5 * * * * flock --nonblock /run/lock/download-result.lock sh -c 'for release in $(distro-info --supported | tac); do autopkgtest-cloud/webcontrol/download-results $release; done; autopkgtest-cloud/webcontrol/publish-db'
[18:01] <Laney> whoopsie
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-crypto (focal-proposed/main) [2.6.1-10ubuntu2 => 2.6.1-11ubuntu2] (core)
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-crypto [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.1-11ubuntu2]
[18:23] <ddstreet> vorlon for lp #1754671, network-manager 1.10.14-0ubuntu2 has been in bionic-proposed for a long while now, and due to regressions, we want to reject that version, and go with smaller patches to bring the version up to 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2 (i.e. just normal version bump)...is that possible/acceptable?  anyone who got the n-m version from bionic-proposed would be stuck on the later problematic version
[18:24] <ddstreet> or should the versioning stick with the -proposed version but add ~really1.10.6 or something?
[18:33] <vorlon> ddstreet: yes, it's acceptable. Anyone who installs from -proposed is on their own for downgrading.
[18:33] <ddstreet> ack thnx, i'll upload the fixed lower version to the queue today
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (focal-proposed/main) [3.6-1ubuntu3 => 3.8-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:51] <ahasenack> perl in proposed-migration has many reds in arm64/armhf, and looks like they are all about missing/broken dependencies of perl itself
[18:52] <ahasenack> or is the report old perhaps?
[18:54] <ahasenack> I wonder why just arm
[18:55] <tkamppeter> ddstreet, thank you for also mentioning this here, I have already asked earlier. Did you get any answer about this?
[18:55] <tkamppeter> vorlon, how should we proceed with the network-manager SRU for Bionic?
[18:56] <ddstreet> tkamppeter yep i was just following up on your request in the lp bug - i'm packaging n-m up now and will upload asap, if vorlon or another admin can reject the n-m in bionic-proposed
[18:59] <vorlon> removing now
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: network-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.6-2ubuntu1.1 => 1.10.6-2ubuntu1.2] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-9 (focal-proposed/main) [9.2.1-9ubuntu2 => 9.2.1-12ubuntu1] (core)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-9 [source] (focal-proposed) [9.2.1-12ubuntu1]
[19:53] <tkamppeter> vorlon, ddstreet, thank you very much.
[20:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tellico (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1ubuntu1 => 3.2.1-1ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tellico [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.1-1ubuntu2]
[20:20] <doko> infinity, vorlon: ^^^ that was the last blocker for perl according to output_notest
[20:23] <doko> ... if it would build ...
[20:23] <infinity> doko: I'm merging with Debian, looks fixed there.
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tellico (focal-proposed/universe) [3.2.1-1ubuntu2 => 3.2.1-2ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[20:47] <infinity> doko: ^-- That one builds.
[20:47] <infinity> (and accepted)
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tellico [source] (focal-proposed) [3.2.1-2ubuntu1]
[20:49] <doko> infinity, tsimonq2: please file a Debian RC issue
[20:50] <tsimonq2> ...wat?
[20:50] <tsimonq2> 0
[20:50] <infinity> tsimonq2: About...?
[20:51] <tsimonq2> I'm missing context as to why doko pinged me.
[20:51] <infinity> Erm, I meant...
[20:51] <infinity> doko: About...?
[20:52] <doko> tellico
[20:52] <infinity> doko: The fix came *from* Debian, so I think we're good. :P
[20:52] <doko> no, having the ubuntu delta disabling these tests
[20:53] <infinity> Ahh.
[20:53] <infinity> doko: : Please forward your changes to Debian. ;)
[20:54] <infinity> Changelog blames you, June last year.
[20:54] <infinity> But I'm sure someone closer to the KDE team could probably just upload the delta.
[20:54] <infinity> tsimonq2: Which might be where you were pinged?  I dunno
[20:54] <doko> crap
[20:54]  * infinity goes to bed with his illness.
[20:55] <doko> tsimonq2 was the last merger
[20:55] <tsimonq2> Ahh.
[20:56] <tsimonq2> File the bug and I'll do the team upload.
[20:58] <vorlon> AssertionError: 'aspell-doc version 1.1 required, but 0.60.7~20110707-3ubuntu0.1
[20:58] <vorlon>  is available\n' not found in 'aspell-doc version 1.1 required, but 0.60.7~20110
[20:58] <vorlon> 707-3build1 is available\n'
[20:58] <vorlon> ... an apport test case that breaks when we publish an sru of aspell to xenial?
[21:00] <doko> iz flaky, override it
[21:00] <vorlon> no, it's not flaky, it's broken
[21:00] <vorlon> (and you don't need to tell me to override it, already done - just kvetching here about the state of the test)
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu9] (core)
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: subvertpy (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.1-2ubuntu1 => 0.10.1-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[22:34] <doko> tsimonq2: #942896
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1028.31] (kernel)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1024.25] (core, kernel)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1028.31~16.04.1] (kernel)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1006.10] (core, kernel)