[08:46] <knome> omg
[08:55] <thorwil> knome: ?
[08:59] <knome> thorwil
[09:02] <thorwil> knome: my question was in response to your utterance of the abbreviation "omg", with my hope being to be informed about what stimulant excited you to the degree reaching beyond your "omg" threshold
[09:02] <knome> too hot (22c)
[09:04] <thorwil> oh well, we may reach 16°C max, today
[09:11] <knome> heh
[09:11] <knome> it's about 6c here
[09:51] <zniavre> good morning
[09:51] <zniavre> does the strange huge border around picture with nautilus will stay like that ?
[09:53] <zniavre> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/187396/Capture-1.png
[11:37] <bdrung> is this the right channel to find graphics designer? can someone convert the svg icon of audacious into a monochrome one that integrates well with ubuntu's default themes (bug #563043)?
[11:41] <vish> zniavre: thats a new "feature" of nautilus.. probably we can file a bug ;)
[11:41] <vish> bdrung: yup , right channel ;)  the bug has already been fixed right?
[11:42] <bdrung> vish: this is the bug where you can find the svg file.
[11:43] <vish> bdrung: ah.. k.. but how do you plan to fix it? in audacious or in ubuntu-mono?  the icon is different for the different panels
[11:44] <bdrung> ubuntu-mono
[11:44] <bdrung> audacious will use audacious-panel as icon if it exists (otherwise it will fall back to audacious)
[11:44] <vish> bdrung: hmm , kwwii mentioned ubuntu-mono was closed for lucid ..
[11:45] <vish> kwwii:  can we add it in ubuntu-mono for lucid?
[11:45] <kwwii> vish: yes
[11:45] <kwwii> vish: send me the icon(s)
[11:46] <vish> kwwii: neat .. there is also another bug , we have missed a few symlinks , we could fix that as well ;)
[11:47] <kwwii> vish: cool, if you have a list of things to change give it to me
[11:48] <kwwii> vish: note that the mono icons should not show up anywhere other than the panel
[11:48] <vish> kwwii: yup , it just happens we have a few less symlinks in ubuntu-mono and they happen to fallback to humanity :s
[11:48] <bdrung> if the icon is called audacious-panel, it will show up only in the panel
[11:49] <kwwii> bdrung: right
[11:49] <kwwii> bdrung: I was just telling vish that to make sure he didn't suggest adding symlinks we purposely don't want
[11:49] <kwwii> :-)
[11:51] <bdrung> kwwii: why don't you use the simplified dh 7 in ubuntu-mono?
[11:51] <kwwii> dh 7?
[11:52] <vish> bdrung: the changelog format?
[11:52] <bdrung> kwwii: debian/rules
[11:53] <kwwii> bdrung: ahhh, no idea...I am not the most amazing packager around
[11:53] <bdrung> file:///usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny
[11:53] <kwwii> :p
[11:53] <bdrung> use this tiny rule
[12:03] <kwwii> bdrung: thanks for the tip :-)
[12:04] <bdrung> yw
[12:04] <bdrung> i can't resist improving ugly looking rule files ;)
[12:04] <kwwii> lol
[12:05] <bdrung> i am not an artist - i am packager
[12:05] <kwwii> I could use a refresher course in packaging
[12:47] <darkmatter> http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/8163/screenshotrtq.png
[12:56] <zniavre> darkmatter,  how did you install this nautilus ?
[12:58] <darkmatter> zniavre: grabbed the 2.30 branch of nautilus elementary from lp. then built myself the rpms :)
[12:58] <zniavre> a ok
[12:59] <zniavre> ho i should try a checkinstall too maybe
[13:18] <darkmatter> zniavre: I'm pretty sure ubuntu has a ppa for lucid
[13:19] <zniavre> not yet
[13:19] <zniavre> and m not lucky with make process >http://paste.ubuntu-fr-secours.org/src-94969
[13:21] <darkmatter> did you grab the correct branch?
[13:23] <zniavre> bzr branch lp:nautilus-elementary
[13:23] <darkmatter> ahhh... wrong branch. sec
[13:24] <darkmatter> zniavre: bzr branch lp:nautilus-elementary/2.30
[13:24] <darkmatter> for lucid
[13:25] <zniavre> haaaa ok
[13:28] <zniavre> darkmatter,  thank you it compiling now
[13:29] <darkmatter> np
[13:43] <zniavre> hey it works
[13:43] <zniavre> :o)
[13:44] <darkmatter> :)
[13:47] <zniavre> im disappointed about the breadcrumb style (its pixmap stuff, i thought it was hardcoded )
[13:53] <darkmatter> yeah. I'll be modding it to look like the official gnome3 mockups (elementary is a good base because it's so heavily modded already
[13:54] <zniavre> i like the rgba stuff for rounded menus
[13:59] <zniavre> http://img717.imageshack.us/img717/9492/capture1tr.png
[14:07] <darkmatter> :)
[14:10] <darkmatter> the pixmap breadcrumbs aren't that bad. they changed the classes for easier theming, plus it makes it more flexible. you could make it look like links, simple dots or forward arrows, etc.
[14:15] <zniavre> ok
[14:18] <zniavre> do you think gnome will integrate some feature of elementary as zoom slider ?
[16:31] <kwwii> vish: did you put together a list of missing links?
[16:35] <kwwii> vish: and a link to the bug would be nice as well...cannot seem to find it
[16:45] <vish> re
[16:45] <vish> kwwii: just a sev
[16:45] <vish> sec*
[16:57] <kwwii> vish: cool, than ks
[18:05] <vish> bdrung: the audacious icon was added , will be available in the next update
[18:05] <vish> s/added/included
[18:11] <bdrung> vish: thanks. how does the monochrome icon look like?
[18:20] <vish> !test
[18:20] <vish> bdrung: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1325768/audaci.png
[18:48] <kwwii> bdrung: any reason why you removed the universe sponsors from my extra wallpaper package?
[19:30] <darkmatter> lol. I have a ton of crap to build and package :D
[20:37] <bdrung> kwwii: bug number?
[20:38] <kwwii> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/563940
[20:38] <knome> hey kwwii :)
[20:39] <kwwii> hey knome
[20:40] <knome> how are you? doing fine, feeling well etc.?
[20:41] <kwwii> knome: yepp, doing well
[20:41] <kwwii> knome: yourself?
[20:42] <knome> i'm fine. working hard to get work for next year since i'm graduating. do you have any it-related projects in mind which would need an artist and/or web developer? :P
[20:43] <kwwii> nothing off the top of my head, but I'll keep you in mind...I hear about things from time to time
[20:43] <knome> thanks :)
[20:44] <knome> remote work would be pretty much a requirement for me though :(
[20:45] <kwwii> that is a somewhat limiting factor, but not necessarily too bad
[20:48] <bdrung> kwwii: you needed a FFe first.
[20:49] <knome> kwwii, yeah. pretty much don't have any other requirements, except it would be nice to get at least *some* money ;)
[20:49] <bdrung> kwwii: did you upload it (fix committed indicates this)
[20:49] <bdrung> ?
[21:23] <kwwii> bdrung: yes, it is uploaded and I wanted to get an FFe with that bug
[21:24] <kwwii> it references a real bug which would be fixed by it
[21:24] <kwwii> and canonical does want it to happen :-)
[21:25] <kwwii> my main freeze exceptions were taken care of by ubuntu-main-sponsors, so I assumed *-universe-* would be correct
[21:35] <bdrung> kwwii: first, ubuntu-main-sponsors and ubuntu-universe-sponsors were merged to ubuntu-sponsors. second, ubuntu-release is responsible for granting FFe. ubuntu-sponsors only for sponsoring packages.
[21:39] <bdrung> kwwii: it's uploaded - i am removing ubuntu-sponsors
[21:46] <bdrung> kwwii: was it really uploaded to the archive? i can't see it in the queue
[21:49] <kwwii> bdrung: no, it was not uploaded to the archive
[21:49] <kwwii> bdrung: I need to subscribe ubuntu-release then
[21:50] <kwwii> I have never tried to get stuff in so late before :p
[22:15]  * darkmatter makes replacement clock faces http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/1593/screenshotqk.png ;D
[22:17] <kwwii> darkmatter: nice
[22:17] <kwwii> the outline seems a bit pixelated to me though
[22:18] <kwwii> perhaps make it thinner or somewhat transparent
[22:18] <kwwii> then again, I don't know which style you inteded
[22:18] <kwwii> intended
[22:18] <kwwii> if it should look realiistic reduce the outline
[22:21] <darkmatter> kwwii: bah. it's because the applet uses svgs for the clock faces. they always pixelate :/
[22:21] <kwwii> darkmatter: which file does it use?  I'm _thinking_ on playing with translucent 'window scenes' in the clock faces for various times of day, but that may be a bit busy
[22:28] <kwwii> wtf? the images in that dir are interesting to say the least
[22:29] <kwwii> not sure I get what you mean...
[22:29] <kwwii> at least I now know the bg of the map is easy to change
[22:29] <darkmatter> yup
[22:30] <kwwii> old-wanda and gegl seem like important images to shiü
[22:30] <kwwii> ship
[22:32] <darkmatter> hehe
[22:38] <kwwii> bdrung: so pitti says get the package uploaded...can you do that?
[23:26] <bdrung> kwwii: i am on it. the package needs some love
[23:32] <kwwii> thanks
[23:33] <kwwii> I appreciate it
[23:39] <bdrung> kwwii: where should the packaging branch be stored?
[23:41] <bdrung> i think lp:ubuntu/ubuntu-wallpaper-extra is the right place (therefore no extra branch is required)
[23:47] <bdrung> uploaded
[23:48] <bdrung> kwwii: there is a difference between subscribing a team and assigning a team. subscribing is the correct one.


[09:54] <Saviq> moin
[09:58] <ltinkl> hey
[11:30] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: Saviq: i was wondering if we should link to https://help.ubuntu.com/community/BasicChroot from https://unity.ubuntu.com/getinvolved/development/unity8/ and suggest people to use a chroot since basically the two envs we support are "unsupported/unstable for desktop"
[11:30] <Saviq> tsdgeos, not a bad idea indeed
[11:31] <tsdgeos> ok, will see how i can articulate it so it doesn't look weird
[14:15] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: ltinkl found the test causing the sole makeExitStatusTest.makeExitStatus from https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/unity-phablet-qmluitests-vivid/1318/ :)
[14:16] <mzanetti> licence header missing iirc
[14:17] <ltinkl> nope, crash
[15:10] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: the license is a different branch
[15:11] <mzanetti> yep... on it...
[15:30] <kgunn> known? or new issue?
[17:32] <mterry> ltinkl, oobe silo rebuilt btw, sorry forgot to poke ya
[17:33] <ltinkl> mterry, np, thx
[17:37] <davmor2> kgunn: check if autoconnect is enabled?
[17:55] <kgunn> davmor2: i can't get any devices to even show up as available
[17:56] <davmor2> kgunn: meh