[08:13] <carlos> morning
[08:23] <Hobbsee> morning carlos
[08:29] <cprov-afk> good morning, folks.
[08:29] <Hobbsee> good morning, not-quite-so-afk-cprov.
[08:32] <cprov> one day, pidgin will handle IRC nicknames correctly. Maybe when its name change for the 3rd time.
[08:33] <Hobbsee> one day, you'll use an application suited to it's purpose.
[08:33] <Hobbsee> use xchat.  i'ts nicer.
[08:33] <Hobbsee> pidgin has always sucked for irc.
[08:36]  * mtaylor is away: going to sleep... very tired
[08:38] <cprov> Hobbsee: err ... not the way the world goes. I'd rather wait it to be fixed ;)
[08:41] <zyga> hello everyone
[08:41] <zyga> I'd like to say that arizona sofrware, the makers of iLocalize have been kind enough to give me a free license for iLocalize so that I can contribute polish translation of the cocoa interface
[10:30] <mpt> Gooooooooooooooooood morning Launchpadders!
[10:30] <Hobbsee> evening mpt
[10:30] <Hobbsee> wait.  do i count as a launchpadder?
[10:31] <Hobbsee> good evening from those of us who *aren't* launchpadders, then.
[11:52] <mpt> Hobbsee, you're one of the most prominent Launchpadders
[12:00] <[0_A4Tech> hello
[12:02] <[0_A4Tech> how i can get 100 CD ? :D
[12:03] <mpt> [0_A4Tech, see "How many CDs can I order?" at <http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/shipit-faq>
[12:04] <[0_A4Tech> )
[12:14] <poolie> hello mpt
[12:15] <mpt> hello
[12:36] <Hobbsee> mpt: oh.   is that a good thing, or a bad thing?
[12:36] <mpt> no
[12:38]  * Hobbsee beats mpt with a stick.
[12:38] <Hobbsee> mpt: "yes" and "no" are not the correct answers to a question containing "or"
[12:39] <mpt> "Yes" can be ambiguous for such a question. "No" is not.
[12:40] <Hobbsee> so it's both not a good thing, and not a bad thing?
[12:40]  * Hobbsee shakes her head
[12:42] <poolie> hello Hobbsee
[12:43] <mpt> correct
[12:43] <Hobbsee> heya poolie!  What did you want before?  I don't think i ever got back from you.
[12:43] <Hobbsee> mpt: you're not one of my coworkers in disguise, are you?
[12:43]  * Hobbsee has seen this kind of reasoning before.
[12:43] <poolie> i don't recall
[12:44] <poolie> in random order
[12:44] <poolie> i'm sorry someone was a dick to you on irc
[12:44]  * Hobbsee nods
[12:44] <Hobbsee> many are, i'm afraid.
[12:44] <poolie> i wondered what you would think of the understandability of https://code.staging.launchpad.net/bzr
[12:44] <Hobbsee> gotta love it.  or at least, not be driven mad by it.
[12:44]  * Hobbsee looks
[12:44] <poolie> compared to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/bzr
[12:46] <Hobbsee> s/ There are download files  available for Bazaar. / There are files available to download for Bazaar./
[12:46] <Hobbsee> what do the stars mean?
[12:47] <Hobbsee> oh.  mouseover shows all.
[12:47] <wgrant> poolie: THe bright orange button burnt my retinas out, I'm afraid.
[12:47] <Hobbsee> wgrant: that's because you live in the dark all teh time, isn't it?
[12:47] <wgrant> And what's with the fake tooltip upon hovering over the last commit.
[12:47] <wgrant> *?
[12:47] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Shh.
[12:48] <Hobbsee> poolie: it's certainly much better.
[12:48] <wgrant> And it uses the security icon to indicate that the branch has errors. Maybe that's normal, and I just don't see broken branches much.
[12:48] <Hobbsee> poolie: what do i use to get a feeling of which are the active, 'official', most used branches?
[12:49] <poolie> the download link is there because i suspect the 'code' tab name is confusing
[12:49] <poolie> people probably suspect that the source code might be there
[12:49] <Hobbsee> poolie: i like the link idea, it just could do with a reword.
[12:49] <poolie> well, in tarball form
[12:49] <poolie> right
[12:49] <Hobbsee> what, you mean it isn't?
[12:50] <poolie> it's there as branches, the tarballs are elsewhere
[12:50] <poolie> wgrant: is it really just the same icon as for security bugs? could be
[12:50] <wgrant> `You can browse the source code  for development focus branch, or get a copy of the branch using the command:' needs rewording, and the link should be extended, but other than that it's much better.
[12:50] <Hobbsee> they look like tarballs/binaries for each of the release series to me....
[12:51] <poolie> Hobbsee: the idea is that this page will highlight the most important branches by sorting them at the top
[12:51] <wgrant> poolie: See the top right of bug #172440, for example.
[12:51] <poolie> so the development focus is at the top always and gets a star
[12:51] <Hobbsee> poolie: any chance you could bold it, or something?
[12:52] <Hobbsee> poolie: a lot of people appear not to see the tooltips
[12:52] <poolie> mm
[12:52] <wgrant> Both I and Firefox disagree with the fake tooltips.
[12:52] <poolie> it used to be highlighted in grey :)
[12:52] <poolie> which is well meant but looks more like disabled than highlighted
[12:53] <poolie> wgrant: mm?
[12:53] <Hobbsee> minor nitpick, but having all the icons of the bugs in line would be nice, rather than just lining up on the right hand side of that column.
[12:53] <poolie> right
[12:53] <Hobbsee> wgrant: how are they fake?
[12:53] <wgrant> Hobbsee: The 'Last Commit' column.
[12:54] <Hobbsee> wgrant: oh.  i hadn't moused over them, i'd only looked to see for the icons.
[12:54] <mpt> poolie, I proposed replacing the tooltipped star with text when I reviewed this for thumper
[12:54] <Hobbsee> poolie: the star is generally unclear - until the mouseover, i have no indication about what it might be.
[12:54] <poolie> they're drawn as html elements, rather than toolkit level tooltips
[12:54] <wgrant> You'll notice when you mouse over that Firefox stalls for a while, and the tooltips stick around for a while...
[12:55] <Hobbsee> short of looking for a moon.
[12:55] <poolie> i kind of like the star :} but perhasp we should at least have text too
[12:55] <poolie> Hobbsee: :-) that would be nice
[12:55] <wgrant> Should dormant branches be hidden by default?
[12:55] <poolie> yes they should
[12:55] <Hobbsee> poolie: i do too, but text somewhere obvious about waht the star means, or a bold thing to make it more obvious, or something would be good
[12:55] <poolie> i think that is an unintended bug
[12:55] <wgrant> Hm.
[12:55] <wgrant> And checking that box stuffs the ordering.
[12:56] <wgrant> Ah.
[12:56]  * Hobbsee sees no dormant branches there?
[12:56] <wgrant> It uses the default sorting option.
[12:56] <mpt> I'm uncomfortable with a checkbox starting with "Hide"
[12:56] <poolie> i think we could show "series: bzr.dev - development focus"
[12:56] <wgrant> mpt: Indeed.
[12:56] <mpt> I'd rather reverse it and have it start with "Show"
[12:56] <poolie> or maybe "Include"
[12:56] <Hobbsee> poolie: something like that.
[12:56] <Hobbsee> mpt: +1
[12:56] <poolie> to me "show" is a bit ambiguous in "show only" or "show also"
[12:56] <wgrant> Is the default ordering in the ordering <select> at all?
[12:57] <Hobbsee> poolie: oh, so the star one isn't the top one when you hit hide dormant branches.
[12:57] <mpt> poolie, if this page becomes popular, you might need to rename "Bazaar" to "Bazaar itself" like we did for Launchpad :-)
[12:57] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Right, that's what I asked about a minute ago. The default ordering isn't the default option.
[12:57] <poolie> "the veritable Bazaar"
[12:57] <poolie> good point
[12:58] <Hobbsee> wgrant: i changed the ordering, but couldn't figure out how to change it back.  refreshing the page did nothing.
[12:58] <Hobbsee> wgrant: so i didn't really see what the default ordering was.
[12:58] <poolie> wgrant: good point about the security icon
[12:58] <mpt> poolie, I suggested renaming "Code" back to "Branches" (like it was before 2006)
[12:58] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Right, you have to delete the query string, I think.
[12:58] <poolie> we need some kind of "broken" icon in our language
[12:58] <poolie> mpt, that makes sense to me
[12:58] <wgrant> poolie: I was wondering why there were so many security branches for bzr.
[12:59] <Hobbsee> wgrant: the string doesn't change.
[12:59] <poolie> right i see what you mean
[12:59] <wgrant> mpt: Why was it renamed?
[12:59] <Hobbsee> wgrant: there is no query string.
[12:59] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Huh, there is for me.
[12:59] <poolie> maybe we need a scarab lying on its back
[12:59] <mpt> wgrant, I think we had a vague idea that PPAs would end up under "Code"
[12:59] <wgrant> That sounds very wrong.
[13:00] <mpt> yeah
[13:00] <mpt> or packages in general, even
[13:00] <Hobbsee> twitch.
[13:00] <mpt> wgrant, it's not a security icon, it's a warning icon, we just happen to (mis-?)use it for security bugs :-)
[13:00]  * mpt looks forward to "security" becoming just another tag
[13:00] <wgrant> mpt: Ah. Well, something needs to be fixed.
[13:00] <wgrant> mpt: We need an icon, surely.
[13:01] <wgrant> Hmm, why does changing any ordering/filtering option redirect to /+bzr?
[13:01] <mpt> I agree we need an icon for broken branches
[13:01] <mpt> I don't see that we need an icon for security bugs
[13:01] <wgrant> Er, /+branches?
[13:03] <wgrant> Why are <project>/+branches and <project> so similar, yet different?
[13:03] <wgrant> Hobbsee: That's your problem.
[13:03] <wgrant> You're on /+branches
[13:03] <poolie> wgrant: that's one of the things we're trying to unify
[13:03] <poolie> in the code currently in production they're massively different
[13:04] <Hobbsee> wgrant: i'm on https://code.staging.launchpad.net/bzr
[13:04] <Hobbsee> wgrant: last i checked, that's not +branches
[13:05] <wgrant> Hobbsee: Ah, when you change any sorting/filtering option it takes you to /+branches.
[13:05] <wgrant> poolie: Is production like edge at the moment?
[13:05] <wgrant> Or is the edge one new this release? I forget.
[13:05] <Hobbsee> wgrant: not in my browser, it isn't.
[13:05] <Hobbsee> wgrant: unless it's cloaking.
[13:06] <poolie> wgrant: i think atm we are in database freeze so edge is not changing
[13:07] <wgrant> Hobbsee: So the 'Hide dormant branches' checkbox on https://code.staging.launchpad.net/bzr doesn't take you to /+branches?
[13:07] <Hobbsee> wgrant: oh, i thought this was with that unchecked.
[13:07] <wgrant> poolie: I'm talking about edge vs. production. You mentioned the production one before, and I wondered how it compared to edge.
[13:10] <poolie> at the moment i think they are the same
[13:11] <wgrant> OK.
[13:13] <poolie> > Hmm, why does changing any ordering/filtering option redirect to /+bzr?
[13:13] <poolie> i think tim is working on fixing that
[13:14] <Hobbsee> when i hit "hide dormant branches", i can't reorder things at all anymore.  is that intentional?
[13:15]  * Hobbsee wonders what dormant means anyway.
[13:15] <Hobbsee> if they're showing branches of any active status by default, surely dormant branches would not feature on that list?
[13:16] <wgrant> Dormant refers to the time of the last commit, IIRC.
[13:22] <Hobbsee> wgrant: but why would dormant branches be active, and show with the default filter anyway?
[13:22] <Hobbsee> i guess this would be fixed with the changing to 'show default branches'
[13:26] <poolie> Hobbsee, wgrant, mpt: thanks for your comments, i'll send it to tim
[13:26] <Hobbsee> poolie: you're welcome.  Hope they're useful.
[13:39] <mantiena-baltix> hi all
[13:40] <mantiena-baltix> Anybody knows why I don't get an email from rosetta with exported translation ?
[13:46] <Ow1> hi, is there a separate channel for rosetta?
[13:46] <wgrant> Ow1: No; this is the appropriate channel.
[13:49] <Ow1> do you know if the "search po files" function is available in edge.launchpad.net ?
[13:49] <Ow1> i saw it is marked for milestone 1.2.4
[13:51] <Ow1> also the blueprint has the "Beta Available" status
[13:53] <mantiena-baltix> Ow1: yea, search function is very important for translations, I'm also waiting for this...
[13:54] <Ow1> here is the status i was talking about: https://edge.launchpad.net/rosetta/+milestone/1.2.4
[13:54] <wgrant> Bug #44
[13:54] <wgrant> Hm, no response.
[13:57] <Hobbsee> wgrant: it's just sleeping
[13:58] <wgrant> Hobbsee: I've seen ubottu respond in other channels... is there no default snarfer for this channel?
[13:58] <Hobbsee> wgrant: it's probably not activated.
[13:58] <Hobbsee> wgrant: my access to that machine got hosed, so....and i'm not sure if i broke it, or if the other guy did.
[14:05] <mantiena-baltix> Anybody knows why I don't get an email from rosetta with exported translation ?
[14:06] <mantiena-baltix> maybe export function is broken again ?
[14:07] <wgrant> mantiena-baltix: How long have you been waiting?
[14:32] <carlos> mantiena-baltix: From what I know, the export queue is a bit busy right now
[14:32] <carlos> so it will arrive, a bit later than usual, but you will get it
[15:03] <gnomefreak> can we upload same version to PPA?
[15:03] <gnomefreak> on nevermind i read it wrong
[15:07] <bd_> Hi, how do I link the automatically created trunk series in a project to a vcs import? I tried going to 'link to branch' but got a permission denied, even though I created the project, and am a member of the maintaining team. The series is https://launchpad.net/openc2e/trunk, and my username is 'bdonlan'.
[15:10] <bd_> Wait, it's already linked, I guess.  The mail says I'm the freevial maintainer.
[15:27] <jordi> I guess the maintainer is a team which I belong to, but this isn't clear at all in the email, and I was about to notify you
[15:28] <Vadi> Is it possible to request to download translations from launchpad not via the web interface? I couldn't find an answer in help
[15:28] <jordi> I can't find a clear place in the project's homepage that says who is the maintainer for the project
[15:28] <EdwinGrubbs> jordi, thanks for the information
[15:28] <jordi> EdwinGrubbs: in any case, from freevial's description, it's GPL3+
[15:29] <jordi> EdwinGrubbs: I guess others in the team will have got this email and will be able to change it on Friday
[15:29] <EdwinGrubbs> jordi, the maintainer is in the block labeled "lifecycle"
[15:29] <jordi> oh good
[15:29] <jordi> ok, so the maintainer is "freevial", hrm
[15:31] <jordi> which is a team, and my team is a member of that team. Ok, that explains my confusion
[16:06] <\sh> -EWTF?
[16:06] <\sh> "You're the registered owner of
[16:06] <\sh> the following affected projects:
[16:06] <\sh>  * ubuntu-whitehat-project"
[16:07] <\sh> Since When Dear Launchpad :)
[16:22] <BjornT> \sh: it's because you're a member of the ubuntu-whitehat team, which is the owner.
[16:24] <\sh> BjornT, Ugh :)
[16:25] <Hobbsee> BjornT: so this is another reason not to register projects in launchpad.
[16:25] <Hobbsee> BjornT: is there a way i can get rid of bugmail for all the projects that i've registered for launchpad?  change hte registree, or something?
[16:26] <BjornT> Hobbsee: because of one e-mail?
[16:27] <Hobbsee> BjornT: no.  because of the bugmail that i get whenever someone marks a bug as also affecting those projects.
[16:27] <Hobbsee> which i'm no longer affiliated with
[16:27] <\sh> Hobbsee, it's just a mistake in the logic...project owner == team , mail should be send only to the team-admin/team-owner...hopefully I'm not labled as team-owner/admin for whitehat ;)
[16:27] <BjornT> Hobbsee: you can get rid of bugmail, either by changing the owner to registry-admins, or setting the bug contact/supervisor to something. if you're not interested in keeping the data about the project up-to-date, i'd suggest changing the owner.
[16:28] <Hobbsee> BjornT: hwo do i get a list of projects i've registered?
[16:28] <kiko-phone> Hobbsee, /people/+me
[16:29] <Hobbsee> kiko-phone: that's not a comprehensive list, is it?
[16:30] <kiko-phone> Hobbsee, there's a link to related projects.
[16:30] <Hobbsee> kiko-phone: found that.  it's not comprehensive, is it?
[16:30] <\sh> kiko-phone, you mean "Projects <me> is involved"?
[16:30] <kiko-phone> yes
[16:30] <\sh> kiko-phone, this is not a list of projects, me registered
[16:30] <\sh> kiko-phone, the list is even wrong
[16:30] <kiko-phone> oh?
[16:31] <\sh> kiko-phone, it's a complete lists of sometimes very strange projects where <me> is involved, directly but mostly indirectly
[16:32]  * Hobbsee scratches head
[16:32] <Hobbsee> BjornT: so, where do i change the owner?
[16:32] <\sh> kiko-phone, and when you check out https://edge.launchpad.net/~shermann/+projects as a stupid example...I never was involved in evolution-scalix project or bluefish editor...
[16:32] <Hobbsee> BjornT: this seems to be very confusing and convoluted.
[16:32]  * gnomefreak lost
[16:32] <Hobbsee> \sh: for some reason, i've got one for bluefish too.  i suspect someone subscribed ~motu or something to it
[16:32] <\sh> or the simple todo manager...
[16:33] <gnomefreak> i thought i set these already
[16:33] <BjornT> Hobbsee: there should be a 'change maintainer' link
[16:33] <\sh> Hobbsee, yes...this is nice , but totally wrong...
[16:33] <gnomefreak> i got iceowla nd mozilla-devscripts
[16:33] <Hobbsee> \sh: yeah, because some idiot subscribed MOTU to it.
[16:33] <gnomefreak> i dont maintain either i fixed iceowl like once
[16:33] <Hobbsee> which, tastily, i can't unsubscribe at all.
[16:34] <Hobbsee> even though i'm part of the team.
[16:34]  * Hobbsee still doesn't understand why people subscribe MOTU to bugs.
[16:35] <Hobbsee> BjornT: oh, it's not with the rest of the options.  will remember to use firefox search first next time
[16:35] <Hobbsee> BjornT:  registry-admins team does not exist, i'm told.
[16:35] <Hobbsee> No results found for keyword 'registry admins'.
[16:36] <BjornT> Hobbsee: ok. let me see what the real name is...
[16:36] <kiko-phone> Hobbsee, ~registry
[16:36] <gnomefreak> where should i be looking to fix this?
[16:36] <Hobbsee> kiko-phone: ah, thanks.
[16:36] <\sh> Hobbsee, because teams and teams can have a different meaning...but there is no way to say, team X will only be to sum up a group of people with special features or rights...but not being a team which is actively doing work on LP things
[16:37]  * Hobbsee wonders why all the "change" bits aren't put together
[16:38] <Hobbsee> bah.  *why* is launchpad sending mass mail, for something that people can not do anything about for at least 2 days?
[16:38] <Hobbsee> Or is the mail wrong?
[16:39] <Hobbsee> if we can only change it from 2/5, then why not email us on 2/5 about it, instead of 30/4.
[16:39] <Hobbsee> \sh: true
[16:39] <Hobbsee> \sh: it's an education thing, in the case of that one
[16:41] <\sh> Hobbsee, I think it would be good, to have a setting (inside the team admin page) which says: actively used for other things then upload rights ... a team for permission managemnent and a team e.g. as a group of devs who are doing project/bug work...imho motu is only used for granting the upload rights, nowadays, right?
[16:41] <Hobbsee> er, yeah, i think so.
[16:44] <\sh> Hobbsee, it's a reminder, that LP will do the change automatically...
[16:44] <\sh> Hobbsee, because right now, there is only GPL which means v1...all GPL stuff will be now labled as GPLv2 and projects which are using GPLv3 needs to change this the day after tomorrow
[16:44] <Hobbsee> \sh: i see that
[16:45] <\sh> which makes sense ,-)
[16:45] <Hobbsee> \sh: but if we're to change it if it's wrong, in a couple of days, *why* is it mailing us now?
[16:45] <Hobbsee> seeing as it specifically says to update it after the second, not before.
[16:45] <\sh> Hobbsee, tomorrow is bank holiday
[16:45] <\sh> in most of the european countries or even world wide? ;)
[16:45] <\sh> s/tomorrow/today/ in some southern parts ;)
[16:45] <Hobbsee> it's not world wide
[16:46] <Hobbsee> lucky :)
[16:47] <Hobbsee> BjornT: thanks for the help
[17:18] <Bronger> What was the reasoning behind this very resticted form of Launchpad mailing lists?
[17:43] <Rinchen> barry, ^^
[17:43] <barry> Rinchen: you mean brogner's comment?  looks like he left the channel :(
[17:43] <Rinchen> ah indeed. I have join/part off
[17:43] <Rinchen> too much noise
[17:44] <Rinchen> oh well, next time
[17:44] <Rinchen> thanks
[17:44] <barry> Rinchen: np!
[18:18] <nxvl> hi!
[18:18] <nxvl> did someone knows who is in charge of shop.canonical.com?
[18:28] <laga> hello. can someone take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mythtv/+bug/221176 ? i should be able to view that bug report, although i only get "permission denied".
[18:28] <laga> yes, it is private, but i should be able to see it.
[18:40] <gmb> nxvl: Is there a problem with the shop?
[18:43] <kiko> laga, why do you say you should be able to see it?
[18:45] <nxvl> gmb: yes, i try to shop the hardy t-shirt, but on the payment i get an error
[18:45] <nxvl> gmb: that was last week
[18:46] <gmb> nxvl: Oh. The Hardy t-shirt has sold out, unfortunately, so there's little that can be done.
[18:46] <nxvl> gmb: now i don't see the purchase, but the amout has been charged to mi CC
[18:46] <gmb> nxvl: Ah.
[18:46] <gmb> Right
[18:46] <gmb> That's a different problem.
[18:46] <nxvl> yep
[18:47] <nxvl> i don't care much about the t-shirt, since is my fault for being so slow
[18:47] <nxvl> but if i'm not getting the thigs i ordered i also don't want to pay for them
[18:47] <gmb> Understandably.
[18:47] <laga> kiko: i could see the previous 'private' reports against mythtv AFAIK. i'm not quite sure how launchpad handles the private reports. i only know that i'm part of the "mythtv ubuntu maintainers" group on launchpad ;)
[18:47] <nxvl> yes
[18:47] <nxvl> so
[18:48] <gmb> nxvl: You should use the contact form at https://shop.canonical.com/contact_us.php to get in touch with the shop people.
[18:48] <nxvl> i want to know if the order is being shipped before i call the bank and find out what's happening
[18:48] <nxvl> gmb: already done :D
[18:48] <kiko> laga, that bug is private because it's been filed by apport. the retracer needs to go through it first before disclosing it IIRC. you should check with somebody on #ubuntu-devel, but it's not a launchpad issue, fundamentally
[18:48] <gmb> nxvl: The person who deals with the shop has gone home for the day, but if you'd like I can talk to them tomorrow morning and ask them to get in touch with you.
[18:48] <nxvl> gmb: i will apreciate it very much
[18:49] <nxvl> gmb: i'm on this nick or in nvalcarcel AT ubuntu DOT com
[18:49]  * gmb makes a note
[18:49]  * nxvl HUGS gmb
[18:49] <gmb> :)
[18:49] <gmb> nxvl: What timezone are you in?
[18:50] <nxvl> gmb: UTC -5
[18:50] <gmb> Okay.
[18:51] <nxvl> gmb: but i'm connected from a server, which is always online, so just ping me and i will answer when i connect myself to it
[18:51] <gmb> nxvl: If you haven't heard from me by mid-day your time tomorrow feel free to give me a ping or email me on <this nick> AT canonical DOT com
[18:51] <nxvl> :D
[18:51] <gmb> Cool.
[18:51] <nxvl> gmb: thanks for your help
[18:51] <nxvl> :D
[18:51]  * nxvl HUGS gmb again
[18:51] <gmb> nxvl: My pleasure.
[18:53] <laga> kiko: thanks.
[18:54] <kirkland> hey guys, i'm getting an error trying to upload to my ppa
[18:54] <kirkland> Error '(104, 'Connection reset by peer')' during ftp transfer of virt-manager_0.5.3-0ubuntu10~ppa2.dsc
[18:55] <gmb> kirkland: I was just about to tell you to try here ;)
[18:55] <kirkland> gmb: thx
[18:55] <gmb> cprov: Around?
[18:55] <kirkland> i've tried it 20 or so times now
[18:55] <gmb> kirkland: cprov or bigjools are the people to talk to about PPAs
[18:56] <kirkland> cprov: around?
[18:57] <gmb> kirkland: He might be back later. It's nearly 8pm for him.
[18:57] <kirkland> gmb: okay, thanks.
[18:57] <gmb> kirkland: If all else fails file a question on http://answers.launchpad.net/soyuz
[19:03] <kirkland> gmb: done.  https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+question/31515
[19:03] <gmb> Cool.
[21:12] <Nafallo> hm...
[21:12] <Nafallo> can I make launchpad not sending me a specific build failure for a specific package on a specific architecture? ;-)
[21:13] <Nafallo> s/specific\ //
[21:13] <stdin> in a word: no
[21:13] <bd_> Nafallo: Change the package to not build there :)
[21:13] <kiko> Nafallo, well, sure. just put the right architectures in your Architectures: line :)
[21:13] <Nafallo> hehe :-)
[21:14] <Nafallo> every time quick-launch-applet has been rebuilt the last half-year or so I get a failure notice for hppa ;-)
[21:15] <bd_> that package doesn't seem to exist oO
[21:39] <Nafallo> quick-lounge-applet
[21:39] <Nafallo> sorry. misspelled it to something obvious instead :-)
[21:40] <Nafallo> what I should really do would be to actually look at the buildlog and fix it... but time :-)