[00:53] <AuroraAvenue> thats over a whole hour to get a response!
[00:54] <AuroraAvenue> nothing else mattrrs.
[00:54] <AuroraAvenue> https://archive.org/search.php?query=sony%20vaio&and[]=mediatype%3A%22software%22
[12:11] <thiras> vscode has new version
[12:12] <thiras> the package is behind. it throw notification at the bottom left. FYI maintainers
[19:24] <vidal72[m]> is there a way to find all snaps which are based on core18?


[04:40] <nagromlt> I want to develope something for Ubuntu
[05:59] <Noskcaj> nagromlt, Then do that ;)
[05:59] <Noskcaj> I don't have time to help you right now, but the info is out there
[08:10] <aschildbach> Hi everyone!
[09:49] <flexiondotorg> Could a sponsor please take a look at - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1439388
[12:34] <aeoril> infinity were you still going to have me do some writing?
[12:34] <aeoril> infinity ^
[13:38] <pitti> Good morning
[13:49] <infinity> aeoril: Quite possibly, if you poke me next week.
[14:27] <tjaalton> doko: the binutils trusty sru seems to have a weird version (-5u13 vs -5u3.1 in -security)?
[14:56] <tjaalton> pitti: hm might have rejected the ubuntu-drivers-common upload too hastily :/
[14:56] <pitti> tjaalton: you can always grab it from the rejected queue again
[14:56] <tjaalton> ah
[14:56] <tjaalton> ok
[14:56] <pitti> tjaalton: but I can also reupload, and add a -v, I didn't look at this yet
[15:00] <tjaalton> pitti: oh I was right afterall, so yeah reupload :)
[15:06] <pitti> tjaalton: wow, 1:<IP_ADDRESS> hasn't been verified since Dec 10??
[15:06] <tjaalton> yeah I just updated it..
[15:06] <tjaalton> oh since dec 10, so over four months then
[15:06] <pitti> tjaalton: reuploaded
[15:07] <tjaalton> thx, I'll ack it and hope the other bug is verified soon
[15:07] <pitti> tjaalton: cheers
[15:21] <pitti> infinity: FYI, langpacks built and tested, looking good; uploading/self-accepting now
[15:32] <infinity> pitti: Ta.
[15:33] <doko> tjaalton, yes, it had a few iterations in the ubuntu-toolchain-r/ppa PPA
[16:19]  * Laney wonders why apt just forgot how to verify signatures
[16:45] <pitti> mvo: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/libudev/
[17:25] <aeoril> infinity ok, will do.  Thanks.
[20:09] <cyphermox> pitti: so, casper/plymouth are still acting up on the CD; looks like it's because in the only-ubiquity case (ie. not a live session), it's trying to set it up to run just before display-manager rather than replacing it properly
[20:10] <pitti> cyphermox: yes, that's on purpose (direct translation of the upstart unit)
[20:10] <cyphermox> that's broken
[20:10] <pitti> cyphermox: or maybe I'm mixing that up with oem-setup
[20:10] <cyphermox> then display-manager will try to start at the same time as things are trying to shutdown
[20:10] <pitti> that at least should run, then lightdm should start
[20:10] <cyphermox> lightdm should never start after ubiquity's install
[20:11] <cyphermox> would you have a chance to take a look?
[20:11] <pitti> cyphermox: ah, ok; so Conflicts=display-manager.service?
[20:11] <cyphermox> specifically, ubiquity.service
[20:11] <cyphermox> no
[20:11] <cyphermox> I think it needs to outright replace display-manager as the display-manager, since that's what it's doing anyway
[20:11] <pitti> or that
[20:12] <pitti> Alias=display-manager.service ?
[20:12] <cyphermox> possibly
[20:13] <pitti> (sorry, talking here)


[07:01] <dholbach> good morning
[07:03] <ajmitch> hi dholbach
[07:06] <geser> good morning
[07:10] <dholbach> hi ajmitch, geser, toabctl
[07:10] <toabctl> hey dholbach
[08:33] <Laney> ello
[08:45] <geser> Hi Laney
[08:55] <iulian> Morning.
[10:11]  * tumbleweed waves from back home in cape town
[10:29] <directhex> are you wearing a cape?
[10:29] <tumbleweed> wouldn't be a bad idea, it's getting chilly
[13:45] <paultag> Hi there, MOTU. I've recieved a report about one of my maintained packages having a bug by default in Ubuntu, which I've ACK'd and fixed. New upload is sitting in sid - but -P is still affected. I've never done a SRU, but I've got a minimal patch. Should I just apply the patch to the version in -P, call it $VERSIONubuntu1, and push it to a PPA for ACK builds, then ask for it to be sponsored?
[13:45] <Laney> target to precise-proposed, file a bug report with the required information, seek sponsorship
[13:45] <Laney> !sru
[13:46] <paultag> Laney: ACK'd, thank you
[13:46] <paultag> Laney: bug is sitting as #1014425 - I've triaged it already.
[13:46] <Laney> cool, then you just need to edit the description to have the required information
[13:47] <paultag> Should I also attach a debdiff there or use REVU or something? I'm like 3 years out of date on any chance of up-to-date policy
[13:47] <Laney> attaching the debdiff is fine
[13:47] <paultag> right, thanks.
[13:48] <Laney> make sure the changelog closes the SRU bug, and just subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to get it on the queue
[13:48] <paultag> yep
[14:18] <vibhav> Ill write a poem dedicated to MOTU's one day
[14:18] <vibhav> :D
[17:43] <aboudreault> Hi.... I'm trying to use pbuilder-dist in a LXC container and can't get it to work since I've upgraded to precise.
[17:43] <aboudreault> the problem is related to the mount /proc
[17:43] <aboudreault> : Failure trying to run: chroot /var/cache/pbuilder/build/22607/. mount -t proc proc /proc
[17:43] <aboudreault> E: debootstrap failed
[17:43] <aboudreault> are you aware of the issue?
[17:45] <tumbleweed> isn't chrooting blocked by apparmor in precise? (or something like that)
[17:46] <aboudreault> it might be, but can't find the proper solution
[17:46] <aboudreault> tried something I've seen in a launchpad bug with no luck
[17:47] <stgraber> aboudreault: hallyn replied to your bug report
[17:47] <aboudreault> stgraber, ha, checking.
[17:52] <aboudreault> great. it worked.
[19:26] <jpds> If a package is at version 3.0.2-1 and I prepare an SRU, the SRU's version is 3.0.2-1ubuntu1 or 3.0.2-1ubuntu0.1 ?
[19:26] <kees> jpds: the latter
[19:26] <kees> (so that it does not conflict with a possible next-release version numbered 3.0.2-1ubuntu1)
[19:27] <jpds> kees: Aha, thought so, thanks.
[19:27] <kees> np :)
[19:29] <micahg> jpds: depends if it's in a previous release at the same version or not
[19:30] <kees> that's that too, yes
[22:09] <micahg> hrm, we have 79 core devs and 72 MOTUs (not including core-devs)
[22:11]  * ajmitch wonders how many of each have uploaded something in the last 6 months, as a measure of activity
[22:11] <ajmitch> could probably find out with UDD
[22:14] <iulian> ajmitch: Core-dev or MOTU? If the latter please don't use UDD or rather don't look for my name.
[22:15]  * iulian should probably jump in and do so some uploads.
[22:15] <ajmitch> iulian: not a matter of finding people to pick on, just trying to see how many people are active in each group :)
[22:16]  * ajmitch should probably do some uploads as well for non-ARB stuff
[22:16]  * ajmitch waits for micahg to mention asterisk :)
[22:17] <iulian> Heh. :)
[22:18] <iulian> I bet he has an evil grin on his face right now. :)
[22:18] <ajmitch> of course
[22:19] <micahg> :D
[22:20] <micahg> out of the top 9 uploaders in precise which account for 50% of the uploads, we have 6 core devs, 2 MOTUs, and 1 Kubuntu dev :)
[22:20]  * ajmitch shall probably just upload it & not sync, since it built
[22:20] <micahg> s/precise/quantal/
[22:22]  * micahg sees that 13 out of the top 50 are MOTU as well
[22:41] <ScottK> KDE has enough packages that I was one of the top sponsors in precise by virtue of have done one complete KDE SC upload.
[22:42] <ScottK> tumbleweed: Would you be up for adding the number of uploads next to each name in http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~stefanor/ubuntu-activity/ - it should make things more sporting.
[22:43] <ScottK> micahg: Possibly worth mentioning that one or your MOTUs in there is a Xubuntu dev.
[22:45]  * Laney hasn't done Haskell yet
[22:45]  * Laney cackles
[22:45] <ajmitch> Laney: more ABI breakage?
[22:46] <Laney> I got the boulder to the top of the hill and it just rolled back down again
[22:46] <ajmitch> oh good, so I can cheat my way onto the charts again? :)
[22:47] <Laney> first fix it on armel
[22:47] <ajmitch> that sounds like work, how'd you break it there?
[22:47] <Laney> blame infinity
[22:48] <ajmitch> ok
[22:48] <ajmitch> are you going to get ghc 7.4.2 in?
[22:49] <Laney> when the time is right
[22:51] <micahg> ScottK: I only mentioned the Kubuntu dev part since he's not a MOTU or core dev
[22:51] <ScottK> OK.


[06:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross-ports (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2ubuntu2 => 2ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (hirsute-proposed/main) [3ubuntu2 => 3ubuntu3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[06:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2ubuntu3]
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3ubuntu3]
[07:21]  * enyc meows
[07:23] <enyc> hrrm, not come across that i386-whitelist before
[07:27] <vorlon> Laney: hmm I got a component-mismatches email about lzma, which has been out of main since bionic; and c-m points somehow at casper and claims you were the last uploader.  Any idea what's going on here?
[07:29] <vorlon> Laney: ok even weirder, the last casper upload was published to release in March...
[07:33] <vorlon> ah. xz-utils used to provide lzma and now it doesn't
[07:34] <vorlon> wait, no, it still does
[07:34] <vorlon> so...
[07:39] <vorlon> possibly related but not sure, demoting mime-support to optional takes bzip2 and xz-utils with it.  If we want these to be always-installed, we'll need to seed them directly
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: knockpy (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1~build1 => 5.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mosquitto (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.0.10-1~build1 => 2.0.10-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted knockpy [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[08:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mosquitto [sync] (hirsute-proposed) [2.0.10-1]
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-11-cross (hirsute-proposed/main) [3ubuntu3 => 3ubuntu4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-11-cross [source] (hirsute-proposed) [3ubuntu4]
[22:43]  * enyc meows