[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [8.3.2-2]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [8.3.2-2]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [8.3.2-2]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [8.3.2-2]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [8.3.2-2]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baler [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baler [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cppdap [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.58.0a-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gomuks [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xarray-datatree [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.0.12-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unity-java [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.1~b1+dfsg-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted baler [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted frugally-deep [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.15.20-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pint-xarray [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.3-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted virtme-ng [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.12-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ecmwf-api-client [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.6.3-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted subarch-select [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.1-1]
[00:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fusefile [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.0-1]
[00:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: x2gokdrive [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server to i386-whitelist in jammy
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-21 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added spirv-llvm-translator-15 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added spirv-llvm-translator-16 to i386-whitelist in jammy
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server to i386-whitelist in lunar
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added openjdk-21 to i386-whitelist in lunar
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added spirv-llvm-translator-15 to i386-whitelist in lunar
[00:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added spirv-llvm-translator-16 to i386-whitelist in lunar
[03:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-22 [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [22~3ea-1] (no packageset)
[03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-22 [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [22~3ea-1] (no packageset)
[05:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: openjdk-22 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [22~3ea-1] (no packageset)
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dhcpcd [sync] (mantic-proposed) [10.0.1-1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-22 [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [22~3ea-1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted x2gokdrive [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-22 [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [22~3ea-1]
[08:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted openjdk-22 [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [22~3ea-1]
[09:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-boxes [source] (lunar-proposed) [44.2-0ubuntu1]
[10:15] <LocutusOfBorg> still redmine infra issue I think... :/
[10:35] <sil2100> o/
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: linux-restricted-modules-media-fixup (focal-proposed/primary) [20.04.1]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: linux-restricted-modules-media-fixup (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04.1]
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-avahi [amd64] (mantic-proposed/none) [0.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pybdsf [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-avahi [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libblockdev [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libblockdev [s390x] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pybdsf [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pybdsf [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-avahi [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-avahi [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libblockdev [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: guile-avahi [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-2] (no packageset)
[11:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pybdsf [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pybdsf [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [1.10.3-1] (no packageset)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libblockdev [arm64] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libblockdev [armhf] (mantic-proposed/main) [3.0.1-1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:45] <cpaelzer> Hi joalif - I'e seen https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2024479 while being on patch pilot duty
[11:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2024479 in kexec-tools (Ubuntu Mantic) "kdump fails on arm64 when offset is not specified" [Medium, In Progress]
[11:45] <cpaelzer> joalif: It is only in the queue due to the bot, so I wanted to ask is this ready and you want it to be reviewed and sponsored?
[11:52] <joalif> cpaelzer the kexec-tools part is ready for review+sponsor
[11:54] <cpaelzer> ok joalif, will have a look after I'm out of the other case I picked now
[11:54] <joalif> thanks cpaelzer !
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-avahi [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-avahi [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-avahi [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libblockdev [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libblockdev [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pybdsf [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.10.3-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pybdsf [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [1.10.3-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pybdsf [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [1.10.3-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-avahi [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libblockdev [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libblockdev [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pybdsf [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.10.3-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted guile-avahi [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [0.4.1-2]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pybdsf [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.10.3-1]
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libblockdev [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [3.0.1-1]
[12:12] <ahasenack> Hello, I'm on +1 maintenance this week
[13:22] <jbicha> sil2100: do you have time to review gnome-shell for jammy-updates? so that the version number 42.9 in GNOME Settings>About from gnome-desktop matches the gnome-shell version
[13:24] <sil2100> jbicha: hey! Sure, I can confirm mutter is phased now, let me check the verification and release
[13:30] <cpaelzer> mfo: hey I've seen your review of bug 2024479 by joalif
[13:30] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2024479 in kexec-tools (Ubuntu Lunar) "kdump fails on arm64 when offset is not specified" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2024479
[13:30] <cpaelzer> mfo: I wanted to do the same and sponsor it
[13:30] <cpaelzer> mfo: so you have found your sponsor :-)
[13:31] <cpaelzer> joalif: all that mfo said is correct, while some of it is "style" and not strictly required it would be nice to be adapted
[13:32] <cpaelzer> joalif: would you be able to refresh those within the next few hours or (as they are trivial) should I do so for you on sponsoring
[13:32] <joalif> cpaelzer: sure!
[13:34] <cpaelzer> joalif: that was an "or question" - which of the two did your sure on?
[13:36] <joalif> cpaelzer: sorry i was reading quickly and read that you just asked me to update those, if you can do the updates while sponsoring, then yes please and thanks a bunch!!
[13:36] <cpaelzer> ok will do
[13:44] <teward> i have a question for the SRU team(s).  Since 18.04 is now in ESM and beyond EoSS, does this affect the SRU policy for 18.04 Bionic?  I ask because there's a bug that ended up in my radar on the sponsors list that, although is a Foundations bug, has an "In progress" task for a Bionic SRU.
[13:54] <mitchdz> Could I please get a sponsor to upload my package to queue for LL/KK/JJ/FF https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2023924 ?
[13:54] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2023924 in ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Lunar) "The latest version creates /\'/var/lib/hibinit-agent\' directory" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [source] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [amd64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [arm64] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [s390x] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [armhf] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [arm64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [s390x] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [armhf] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:23] <teward> disregard my question, enr0n answered it :)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: upower [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/main) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1] (core)
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tecla [riscv64] (mantic-proposed/universe) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [armhf] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [riscv64] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tecla [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed) [45~alpha-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [s390x] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted upower [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [1.90.2-2~newqueue1]
[14:46] <mirespace> mitchdz: I'm seeing today that subscribing the bug to ubuntu-sponsors is a way to go too
[14:47] <mitchdz> mirespace: oh yeah, I forgot about that. Thanks!
[14:52] <mirespace> mitchdz: yw!
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed dgen from i386-whitelist in mantic
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed zsnes from i386-whitelist in mantic
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added libnvme to i386-whitelist in mantic
[15:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server to i386-whitelist in mantic
[15:35] <flag> https://code.launchpad.net/~p-pisati/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/446407
[15:36] <flag> if any member of the ubuntu-release-team could take review this, that would be nice ^
[16:14] <blackboxsw> sil2100: if there is time today for SRU review: cloud-init has completed all supplemental verification of 23.2.1 which has two minor fixes for regressions found during SRU testing of  23.2.
[16:20] <vorlon> ppisati: merged
[16:22] <ppisati> vorlon: ta
[18:58] <sil2100> blackboxsw: hey! Let me look into releasing that in a moment then
[18:58] <blackboxsw> asesome sil2100 thx.
[20:05] <ahasenack> hi, I have an autopkgtest infrastructure question. I see that redmine was put back in the "never_run" list: https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs/commit/?id=b8907a80585da842900033304c9eb93ccd0947c8
[20:05] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit b8907a8 in ~ubuntu-release/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-package-configs "Put redmine/s390x/mantic back in never_run"
[20:05] <ahasenack> and that matches the logs: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/r/redmine/mantic/s390x
[20:05] <ahasenack> see "blacklisted" and "denylisted" all over the place
[20:06] <ahasenack> so my question is why are there so many runs even if it's in the "never_run" list. All manual triggers? I see some are manual, but others don't have a "requester"
[20:06] <bdmurray> I don't see a ?
[20:06] <ahasenack> second question is now that it's in this never_run list, how to clear a red state in the excuses page? https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#nginx
[20:07] <bdmurray> The "never_run" tells autopkgtest not to actually run the test, britney or people can still request the test
[20:08] <bdmurray> to clear it pray that s390x behaves better
[20:09] <ahasenack> but even if britney asks for a run today, the result will be "X denylisted". Will that clear the "regression" status in excuses?
[20:10] <bdmurray> No, when s390x is behaving better we'll remove redmine from the never_run list
[20:10] <bdmurray> Then the test will get run and return some result
[20:10] <ahasenack> oh, so never_run was not an attempt to clear this state then, ok
[20:12] <bdmurray> No, its an attempt to get other packages in the queue processed.
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [i386] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [amd64] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [armhf] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [ppc64el] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [s390x] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: texinfo [arm64] (mantic-proposed/main) [7.0.3-2] (core, i386-whitelist)


[00:20] <jcrigby> infinity, ok will do, there have been many "cleanup 4.6" patch sets upstream so maybe things will just work once I rebase against v2011.12
[00:24] <infinity> jcrigby: Awesome.  Here's hoping.
[04:11] <lilstevie> infinity: also with that universal kernel plan
[04:12] <lilstevie> infinity: http://trimslice.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=260 <-- seems archlinux have already started on such a project
[04:31] <lilstevie> infinity: although I do see the problem of all older devices being id'd as harmony, and honeycomb tablets being id'd as ventana
[04:32] <ceti331> how well does ubuntu work on android tablets genially these days
[04:32] <ceti331> can you run it on an android phone such as galaxy s2.. can it dual boot
[04:33] <lilstevie> I'm sure you could run it on the GS2, you probably wouldn't have acceleration, but it will boot; oh and samsungs bootloader is a bit of a pain so there wouldn't be dual boot
[04:33] <lilstevie> samsung use 1 kernel for both normal and recovery boots
[04:34] <lilstevie> where as on the asus transformer I use the boot/recovery split to wedge in dual boot
[04:40] <ceti331> whats
[04:41] <ceti331> what android devices are best for running ubuntu
[04:41] <ceti331> i don't have any so purchase decision could be influenced by existing ubuntu support
[04:47] <lilstevie> hard to say
[04:47] <lilstevie> what form factor would you be looking at
[04:47] <lilstevie> I mean overall the AC100 is the most feature complete port
[04:48] <ceti331> phone or tablet, not sure. I don't currently have a smartphone. i have an iPad - so an android phone is tempting
[04:48] <lilstevie> they actually have a decent team behind them, but that is really a netbook formfactor
[04:48] <lilstevie> really the AC100 is probably the only one I could suggest right now
[04:48] <Martyn> There is an upcoming Toshiba with an nvidia3 in it
[04:49] <Martyn> Also a cortex A9, but more memory and power
[04:49] <ceti331> that sounds cool
[04:49] <Martyn> nvidia tegra3 rather
[04:49] <Martyn> Yep, but it's due late Feb, early March
[04:49] <Martyn> the AC100 is, I'd agree, the most complete port
[04:49] <lilstevie> my port for the TF101 is really incomplete, and there is the problem that new devices don't have nvflash access to run the installer
[04:49] <Martyn> I'd avoid the Genesi MX .. it's got the least support right now
[04:50] <ceti331> i guess the ideal for me would be something like the asus transformer
[04:51] <ceti331> i like the idea of that a lot
[04:51] <lilstevie> ceti331: the tf101 is amazing
[04:51] <lilstevie> but frankly the port isn't quite there yet :)
[04:53] <Martyn> lilstevie: Where can I get the tf101?  I've had a hell of a time finding one
[04:54] <Martyn> (plenty on Amazon, but for higher-than-I'd-like prices)
[04:54] <Martyn> and do they come with the keyboard?  Or do you have to buy them separately?
[04:57] <lilstevie> Martyn: well David Barth got mine for me, that was sans keyboard; but they do come with the keyboard if you get the 32GB vers, there is also a 16GB vers that comes with keyboard, but I have not seen it anywhere
[04:57] <lilstevie> Martyn: if you are in the US I hear best buy have them
[04:57] <lilstevie> and with a good price at the moment
[04:58] <steev_> Martyn: least support how?
[04:58] <lilstevie> TF101-A2 /B2 come with the dock, TF101-A1/B1 are sans dock
[05:28] <Martyn> steev_ : Genesei is always behind the main release by a whole release
[05:28] <Martyn> so they are -just- working on natty
[05:28] <Martyn> and Oneric is already out
[05:49] <steev_> not entirely true, but also not entirely our fault... but he left so doesn't matter
[13:28] <maystar> Hello! Can anybody give me an advise which ubuntu version currently is the most stable and supports the basic features like wifi, video acceleration and bluetooth of the pandaboard? I would like to use it as a multimedia platform. I've tried oneiric, but it seems to be not stable yet and there were problems with wifi, bluetooth and video
[13:39] <lilstevie> maystar: if you are having problems with oneiric try natty
[13:54] <maystar> I've read in the omapedia wiki that there is no video acceleration support in natty "yet". Is this information outdatet?
[21:00] <maystar> Hey! Is anybody, who can explain me what's the difference between the linux-image-version-linaro-omap and the linux-image-version-linaro-lt-omap kernel version? They are both available in the linaro ppa, but I can't find any specific information about them
[21:14] <TheMuso> maystar: You probably want to ask in another 24 hours or so. For many devs its still the weekend, and they are likely not around at the moment.,
[21:19] <maystar> ok, thanks!
[21:23] <infinity> maystar: It has to do with how far they diverge from upstream.  -linaro- kernels use linaro's common head, and -linaro-lt- kernels have extra patches from the SoC landing teams.
[21:24] <infinity> maystar: The goal is for things to flow from landing teams to linaro common code to kernel.org upstream, but if you want to try the latest, greatest (and possibly broken) shiny that the landing teams are working on, that's what the -lt- kernels are for.


[07:36] <fling> Is there 5.4.49 compat patch for shiftfs?
[07:36] <fling> What is the latest 5.4 kernel I could use shiftfs patches with?