[02:58] <niceusr> Hi. Can i get an ubuntu cloak please. My launpad acount is https://launchpad.net/~niceusr
[03:04] <pleia2> niceusr: you need to be an ubuntu member for an ubuntu cloak
[03:04] <pleia2> !membership
[03:05] <niceusr> pleia2, oh, my mistake sorry
[03:06] <pleia2> no need to be sorry :)
[03:09] <niceusr> ok, i'm going to try my best to become a member :)
[03:10] <pleia2> glad to hear it :)
[03:13] <Unit193> Good luck, niceusr!
[19:10] <bkerensa> congrats AlanBell pici topyli Funkyhat ;)
[19:12] <AlanBell> thanks bkerensa
[19:13] <Pici> bkerensa: thanks
[19:13] <Unit193> Congrats and hope you make it a good year
[19:23] <topyli> thanks Unit193, bkerensa. we'll do our best


[04:15] <jibel> morning all
[05:41] <duflu> Hi jibel
[05:42] <duflu> If you were 15 minutes earlier it would have also been morning in Australia
[05:46] <jibel> Hey duflu, I could have been earlier actually, i'm up since 4:30. far too early :(
[05:47] <jibel> good thing is that i'll end my day early afternoon
[06:31] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[06:32] <duflu> Hi oSoMoN
[06:33] <oSoMoN> hey duflu
[06:39] <jibel> bonjour oSoMoN
[06:59] <oSoMoN> salut jibel
[08:20] <seb128> gooood morning desktopers!
[08:26] <jibel> salut seb128, ça va?
[08:26] <seb128> lut jibel, ouais, et toi ?
[08:28] <jibel> seb128, démarré beaucoup trop tôt à mon goût ce matin mais ça va
[08:28] <seb128> à quelle heure ?
[08:29] <duflu> Morning seb128
[08:29] <seb128> hey duflu, how are you today?
[08:29] <duflu> Also see ya.. :)
[08:29] <duflu> Good, you?
[08:30] <seb128> I'm good
[08:30] <seb128> duflu, have fun!
[08:30] <duflu> Will try ;)
[08:30] <jibel> seb128, réveillé à 4:30, démarrage à 5:00 pour m'occuper l'esprit
[08:30] <seb128> jibel, outch, en effet c'est tôt :-(
[08:31] <jibel> seb128, at least autopilot-gtk is fixed
[08:31] <jibel> seb128, I'll need a sponsor
[08:31] <seb128> le positif c'est que t'as déjà fait une demie journée de travail :)
[08:31] <seb128> jibel, I can sponsor
[08:32] <jibel> even the tests are passing. I'm wondering how the ever passed during the build. dbus was not started
[08:32] <seb128> jamesh, if you didn't IRC block me yet for nagging you every week about that, weekly summary reminder :-)
[08:33] <seb128> hum, that looks weird indeed
[08:35] <jibel> well, latest release was 15.10 so maybe the behaviour was different by then
[08:36] <jibel> stable quality software requires no maintenance ;)
[08:53] <marcustomlinson> hey seb128 and jibel
[08:53] <seb128> hey marcustomlinson, how is it going?
[08:54] <marcustomlinson> seb128: good thanks. you?
[08:54] <seb128> I'm good thx
[09:01] <oSoMoN> salut seb128 , good morning marcustomlinson
[09:01] <marcustomlinson> hey oSoMoN
[09:02] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, how are you? how was the talk yesterday?
[09:03] <oSoMoN> seb128, I'm tired but good. The talk went well, there weren't many attendees (a dozen), but they asked lots of questions afterwards, and a couple of them expressed interest in snapping their apps
[09:03] <oSoMoN> and then we had beers :)
[09:04] <seb128> oSoMoN, nice!
[09:10] <marcustomlinson> oSoMoN: nice :) do you have slides to share?
[09:15] <lan3y> interesting
[11:37] <Wimpress> Morning o/
[11:39] <marcustomlinson> hey Wimpress
[13:32] <seb128> k, looks like we can all go in holidays, doko DoSed the infra for the week probably...
[13:37] <marcustomlinson> seb128: bye! have a happy christmas!
[13:38] <marcustomlinson> XD
[13:38] <seb128> indeed, you too!
[13:39] <seb128> would be nice to have NMU support in launchpad
[13:39] <seb128> also would be nice to have people consider the impact on the archive/others before that kind of giant stack of uploads
[13:41] <seb128> anyway, let's not get into ranting mood today :-)
[14:29] <Wimpress> Hi desktoppers.
[14:29] <marcustomlinson> hi
[14:29] <oSoMoN> hey Wimpress
[14:29] <Wimpress> Just finishing up another meeting. Be with you in a few mins.
[14:29] <kenvandine> hey hey hey
[14:30] <hellsworth> good morning everyone
[14:31] <oSoMoN> good morning hellsworth
[14:32] <hellsworth> hi oSoMoN. hope your tuesday is going well :)
[14:32] <seb128> hey hellsworth, how are you?
[14:32] <hellsworth> i'm really tired but slowly waking up
[14:33] <seb128> coffee!
[14:33] <hellsworth> most definitely
[14:33] <Trevinho> the kid played the kid? :)
[14:33] <Wimpress> Right, shall we start?
[14:33] <seb128> _o/
[14:33] <seb128> oh, a Trevinho!
[14:34] <seb128> Trevinho, bunjourno, long time not seen on IRC :-)
[14:34]  * Trevinho is always hidden in his hole!
[14:34] <marcustomlinson> a wild Trevinho appears
[14:34] <seb128> I noticed
[14:34] <Wimpress> #startmeeting Desktop Team Weekly Meeting - 2019-12-17
[14:34] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Dec 17 14:34:27 2019 UTC.  The chair is Wimpress. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[14:34] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[14:34] <seb128> that's the effect of winter on you? ;-)
[14:34] <Wimpress> Roll call:  didrocks (out), duflu, hellsworth, jamesh, jibel, kenvandine, Laney, marcustomlinson, oSoMoN, seb128 , tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell
[14:34] <seb128> _o/
[14:34] <marcustomlinson> \o
[14:34] <Trevinho> _/
[14:34] <kenvandine> hey
[14:35] <Laney> sup
[14:35] <oSoMoN> o/
[14:35] <hellsworth> \o
[14:35] <Wimpress> #topic rls-bb-bugs
[14:35] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:36] <Wimpress> This one is still unassigned http://launchpad.net/bugs/1856054
[14:37] <marcustomlinson> we're tracking this as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd-glib/+bug/1856196
[14:37] <marcustomlinson> right?
[14:38] <marcustomlinson> in any case feels like a -1 from me
[14:39] <Laney> that bug should be won't fixed with a reference to the other one
[14:39] <seb128> right
[14:39] <Laney> when that is done it's just someone ranting about a library
[14:40] <hellsworth> should the second bug be moved to a different release to get actually addressed?
[14:40] <hellsworth> well fix committed effectively across teh board
[14:40] <seb128> it's already targetting the different series it needs
[14:40] <hellsworth> right
[14:40] <hellsworth> thanks
[14:42] <Wimpress> Right, so I shjall close #1856054
[14:43] <seb128> wontfix it yeah
[14:43] <Wimpress> Done.
[14:43] <Wimpress> Move on to tracking bugs?
[14:43] <seb128> yes
[14:43] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:44] <kenvandine> bug 1794478
[14:45] <Wimpress> There's a few unassisnged for desktop.
[14:45] <Laney> Till unassigned a bunch of bugs from himself
[14:46] <hellsworth> there are so many unassigned bugs in the unknown section..
[14:46] <oSoMoN> I just talked to slashd about that specific one, and he said his team is going to take care of it, as it's something a client cares about
[14:47] <Wimpress> SHould we assign it to slahd then?
[14:47] <kenvandine> great
[14:47] <oSoMoN> I don't know, I'd let him do that, it's fine to leave it unassigned until then, no?
[14:47] <oSoMoN> I'll ping him to ask
[14:47] <Wimpress> OK
[14:48] <Wimpress> http://launchpad.net/bugs/942856
[14:49] <seb128> they are all in the same bucket of 'bionic n-m SRU needs someone to care about it if we want to see it happening'
[14:49] <seb128> I'm unsure we are going to resolve that today...
[14:50] <Wimpress> seb128 Laney kenvandine I think we need to review these in a separate call.
[14:50] <seb128> or we just rls-bb-notfixing those for now to reflect we don't have maintainer and can't take on those
[14:50] <Laney> ok
[14:50] <seb128> that wfm
[14:50] <Wimpress> Let's just park the n-m unassigfned bugs for now.
[14:50] <seb128> +1
[14:50] <kenvandine> +1
[14:51] <Laney> Next meeting we should deal with them either way if they are still there
[14:51] <Wimpress> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1637988
[14:51] <Laney> Don't want them to be hanging around eternally
[14:51] <seb128> indeed
[14:51] <Wimpress> Agreed.
[14:51] <seb128> Wimpress, we usually skop the fix commited ones
[14:52] <seb128> that gvfs is another tricky situation
[14:52] <seb128> and not new
[14:52] <Laney> looks like fix committed is wrong there though, is it?
[14:52] <seb128> basically libnfs is in universe in bionic/cosmic and has been promoted since
[14:53] <seb128> Laney, yes, the SRU got deleted
[14:53] <Laney> nod
[14:53] <seb128> I don't have the energy to deal with that one atm though
[14:53] <seb128> but we should probably either wontfix or put back to triaged
[14:54] <seb128> basically security team would like to see a libnfs update if we want to retro-promote
[14:54] <seb128> but that comes with a soname change
[14:54] <seb128> there was some customer requests behind though
[14:54] <seb128> maybe another one to discuss in the same other meeting...
[14:54] <Laney> can't be that important if it idled for 7 months
[14:55]  * Laney is on team won't fix ;-)
[14:55] <seb128> right
[14:55] <seb128> well, maybe we lost a customer on the way or disapponted one :-(
[14:55] <Wimpress> I am OK with won't fix for bionic.
[14:55] <seb128> Wimpress, go for it then
[14:55] <seb128> if we wontfix bionic we can wontfix cosmic as well for sure
[14:56] <Laney> lol cosmic
[14:56] <seb128> well in any case cosmic is wontfix at this point
[14:56] <seb128> :)
[14:56] <Laney> :D
[14:57] <Wimpress> Done.
[14:57] <Wimpress> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh/+bug/1847514
[14:58] <Wimpress> Why is libssh in the desktop-packages?
[14:59] <Laney> remmina it looks like
[14:59]  * Wimpress blames Trevinho ;-)
[15:00] <Wimpress> I don't think this is rl critical for the desktop.
[15:00] <seb128> it looks like a real problem but no obvious solution and probably not rls material imho
[15:00] <seb128> I vote rls-bb-notfixing
[15:01] <Wimpress> +1
[15:01] <Laney> indeed
[15:01] <hellsworth> agreed
[15:01] <Wimpress> Done
[15:01] <Laney> you need to delete the bionic line fwiw
[15:01]  * Trevinho not sure is faulty for libssh being there.
[15:01] <Laney> for ones that already got nominated
[15:02] <Wimpress> ANd done.
[15:02] <Wimpress> Move on to Disco?
[15:02] <seb128> +1
[15:03] <Wimpress> #topic rls-dd-bugs
[15:03] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[15:03] <Wimpress> Looks good.
[15:03] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[15:04] <Wimpress> An n-m bug there we will sort out another time.
[15:04] <seb128> +1
[15:04] <Wimpress> Other than that looks good.
[15:04] <Wimpress> Time for Eoan?
[15:05] <seb128> yes
[15:05] <Wimpress> #topic rls-ee-bugs
[15:05] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[15:05] <Wimpress> Looks good.
[15:06] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ee-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[15:07] <Wimpress> I'll skip over the n-m unassigned bug
[15:07] <Wimpress> http://launchpad.net/bugs/1845801
[15:08] <seb128> Laney, is that similar to your recent problems/debugging?
[15:08] <seb128> Wimpress, we should probably just assign the other lines to tseliot there
[15:09] <Laney> doubt it
[15:09] <Laney> that's the same bug we have been skipping for weeks
[15:09] <seb128> right, I'm assigning to tseliot now
[15:09] <Laney> cool
[15:09] <Wimpress> I've assigned Alberto to gnome-session since he assigned himself to that for Eoan.
[15:10] <Wimpress> But, what about gnome-shell?
[15:10] <seb128> I did the same
[15:10] <seb128> one person does the investigation
[15:10] <Wimpress> OK.
[15:10] <seb128> we can then reassign later if required
[15:10] <Wimpress> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules/+bug/1856407
[15:11] <tseliot> Wimpress, seb128 what am I supposed to do with that, exactly? Disable the splash with NVIDIA?
[15:12] <seb128> tseliot, I don't know, I don't understand the issue enough to tell. But it seems to be something quite some user complain about so we need to dig at the bottom of it
[15:13] <seb128> Wimpress, unsure what is needed for ubuntu-drivers-common in that one but looks like Seth is on it
[15:13] <seb128> maybe assign to him with a comment saying to reassign back/talk to us if there is work needed from our side?
[15:13] <Wimpress> OK
[15:14] <tseliot> I can't really reproduce the problem here
[15:15] <tseliot> and I think that blacklisting nvidia, and have it default to the text splash might be a little heavy handed
[15:17] <seb128> k, we need to have a look/discuss options
[15:17] <seb128> but probably not now, we still have some topics to cover and less than 15min to the next meeting for some of us
[15:17] <Wimpress> #topic rls-ff-bugs
[15:17] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[15:18] <Wimpress> Looks good.
[15:18] <Wimpress> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-ff-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[15:18] <Wimpress> n-m again. SKip that for now.
[15:18] <Wimpress> Other than that, looks good.
[15:19] <Wimpress> #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages
[15:19] <seb128> incoming actually should be empty, those are assigned, I'm untagging them
[15:19] <Wimpress> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages
[15:20] <Wimpress> Nice work team! Excuses is looking in good shape for desktop.
[15:20] <seb128> \o/
[15:20] <marcustomlinson> wow
[15:20] <marcustomlinson> looks good
[15:20] <seb128> one is a MIR waiting for security review, one is waiting for steve to do i386 restoring of binaries
[15:20] <hellsworth> hopefully we'll get the libmail-dkim-perl sorted out this week too
[15:20] <seb128> basically our only real item is the duplicity build failure
[15:21] <seb128> the 2 bottoms ones built now so they should go away
[15:21] <Wimpress> Should we create a Trello card for duplicity?
[15:21] <Laney> someone needs to fix it, so ... probably
[15:22] <Wimpress> seb128: Please, can you create card for duplicity.
[15:22] <Wimpress> ANyone fancy it?
[15:22] <seb128> I can (if we don't have it yet)
[15:22] <seb128> I'm working on it
[15:22] <hellsworth> i'll take a look at duplicity
[15:22] <seb128> hellsworth, oh, if you want that would be welcome :)
[15:22] <Wimpress> Thanks hellsworth
[15:23] <hellsworth> will you please create the card and add me to it?
[15:23] <hellsworth> or i can'
[15:23] <hellsworth> there will be a card and it will be looked at :)
[15:23] <seb128> hellsworth, https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1853809 was used for some of that but got closed
[15:23] <Wimpress> Great.
[15:23] <hellsworth> ok thanks seb128
[15:23] <hellsworth> i'll holler if i get stuck
[15:23] <seb128> hellsworth, I will card it and add you
[15:23] <hellsworth> ty
[15:23] <seb128> thanks to you!
[15:23] <Wimpress> Time for AOB?
[15:24] <seb128> hellsworth, ah, we have one already, adding you to https://trello.com/c/BwzB6AHv/12-duplicity-focal-ftbfs
[15:24] <Wimpress> #topic AOB
[15:24] <Wimpress> I need coffee before the next call.
[15:24] <Wimpress> Nothing more from me.
[15:25] <Trevinho> I might need some comments on https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/3v1n0/libfprint-tod-example-driver
[15:25] <seb128> nothing from me either
[15:25] <Trevinho> so feel free to check that
[15:25] <Trevinho> (and dependent lib)
[15:25] <seb128> Trevinho, k, what does "tod" mean?
[15:26] <Trevinho> TOuch Driver... I didn't like just "td" xD
[15:26] <seb128> Wimpress, we should aim at making the meeting go a bit faster in the futur if we can, it used to fit in an half hour, more time for coffee :-)
[15:26] <marcustomlinson> Trevinho: I think this fell out of your radar. Please could you comment: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128803
[15:26] <Wimpress> seb128: OK.
[15:27] <Wimpress> All done?
[15:27] <seb128> I think so
[15:28] <Wimpress> #endmeeting
[15:28] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Dec 17 15:28:03 2019 UTC.
[15:28] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2019/ubuntu-desktop.2019-12-17-14.34.moin.txt
[15:28] <marcustomlinson> thx
[15:28] <seb128> thanks team!
[15:28] <Wimpress> Thanks desktoppers
[15:28] <Trevinho> marcustomlinson: yes, I've to get into that asap
[15:28] <marcustomlinson> Trevinho: I'm just afraid that the LO guys are brushing it off thinking it's entirely a mutter issue
[15:29] <marcustomlinson> and I don't know enough to explain that it isn't
[15:29] <Trevinho> Yeah, I've to check through the things again, but I will
[15:29] <marcustomlinson> thanks Trevinho!
[15:50] <jibel> I'd need a sponsor for autopilot-gtk 1.6. Branch and debdiff attached to bug 1856574
[16:00] <seb128> jibel, I uploaded now but the vcs was missing an archive upload, I merged that in and sent you the patch (I can't push to the git)
[16:16] <jibel> seb128, thanks
[16:16] <seb128> np! thank you for doing the actual work :)
[16:17] <jibel> seb128, ah that's fine, I re-fixed it
[16:21] <Laney> jibel: in the new ubiquity enhanced design, do you know why encryption is under advanced features? (i know it's on the design like that, wondering if you know why it is)
[16:22] <Laney> s/enhanced/focal/ ;-)
[16:23] <Laney> or mpt ^-
[16:28] <mpt> Laney, it wasn’t my first choice, but it was something they could implement in time that showed the dependency between encryption and LVM
[16:29] <Laney> It's just that I'm a bit concerned about hiding full disk encryption like that
[16:34] <mpt> Laney, hmm, is the “Encrypt the new Ubuntu installation…” checkbox shown in <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bZ4yQIVgGaUGSYu3qiUHnQt3ieBZoqunP_DcleHCr3I/preview#bookmark=id.wht5l3rbb5bm> no longer present?
[16:34] <jibel> we can revisit that this cycle but it was very hard to go against the way partman expects things to happen when you go forward and backward between several disk setup steps.
[16:37] <Laney> mpt: hmm, no, it looks like this currently: https://people.canonical.com/~laney/weird-things/focalubi.png
[16:37] <jibel> mpt, the design implemented is from page 12 to 16 of the spec
[16:38] <jibel> with encryption in the advanced dialog
[16:39] <mpt> jibel, sure, understood, I didn’t realise that meant getting rid of the non-LVM encryption
[16:39] <jibel> I don't remember we ever had non lvm encryption
[16:41] <mpt> It was added to the installer in Ubuntu 12.10
[16:41] <mpt> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FullDiskEncryptionHowto
[16:43] <jibel> hm, I'll have to reinstall 12.10 then. But before the change there was only lvm and lvm+encryption not encrpytion without lvm
[16:43] <jibel> I'll search when it disappeared and why
[16:44] <mpt> I was under the impression that the reason you used the phrase “the new Ubuntu installation” so often in your initial UI was that you were copying the text of that checkbox
[16:46] <Laney> I think it did require you to install on LVM, but it wasn't presented as a sub-item
[16:50] <mpt> Hmm, the help page doesn’t mention LVM … Maybe it did use LVM and I was oblivious
[18:42] <hellsworth> i need to pop down to the post office to mail all the things but i'll be back
[18:42] <hellsworth> i'll be afk for maybe an hour (depending on the line)
[19:24] <marcustomlinson> alright I'm out. g'night all


[07:07] <stewart> hi! how does one mark a private bug as not private? what permission is needed?
[07:09] <lifeless> stewart: there is a control in the top right of the bug page.
[07:09] <stewart> lifeless, that's what i expected... but i don't see it. only a "this report is <b>private</b>"... no edit next to it.
[07:09] <lifeless> what # ?
[07:12] <stewart> lifeless, https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-server/+bug/955104
[07:12] <ubot5`> Error: ubuntu bug 955104 not found
[07:14] <lifeless> wgrant: whats the status of information_type etc w.r.t. quesitons like stewart's ?
[07:14] <lifeless> stewart: percona-server has no bug supervisor set
[07:14] <lifeless> stewart: are you in percona-core ?
[07:15] <stewart> lifeless, ahh... yes, i am
[07:15] <lifeless> ok, so you should have management acls
[07:16] <stewart> lifeless, so it doesn't allow project maintainer to, it *must* be explicitly set as bug supervisor?
[07:16] <lifeless> not sure
[07:16] <lifeless> I can either check the code, or nag someone whose been touching it recently ;P
[07:16] <lifeless> StevenK: wgrant: ^ :)
[07:17] <stewart> lifeless, i'll set bug supervisor and security contact at least
[07:17] <wgrant> lifeless, stewart: Anyone who can see the bug can change that.
[07:17] <wgrant> stewart: Which browser are you using?
[07:17] <lifeless> ah yes
[07:17] <stewart> wgrant, Chromium
[07:17] <lifeless> chrome, right /..
[07:18] <lifeless> stewart: you might want a bug supervisor though, so that you don't get bugmail [with a bug supervisor you can unsubscribe the team, with no supervisor its implicit]
[07:18] <wgrant> stewart: Are you in ~launchpad-beta-testers?
[07:18] <stewart> lifeless, wgrant: just setting these won't affect bug mail at all, right?
[07:18] <wgrant> Oh hm.
[07:18] <stewart> lifeless, bug mail is a feature :)
[07:19] <stewart> wgrant, hrm... let me check...
[07:19] <wgrant> stewart: So, the soon to be released beta UI works, but the old one appears to have broken somewhere along the line...
[07:19] <wgrant> It's meant to link to https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-server/+bug/955104/+secrecy
[07:19] <ubot5`> Error: ubuntu bug 955104 not found
[07:19] <wgrant> You can go there manually to change it.
[07:20] <stewart> wgrant, no, not in ~launchpad-beta-testers as far as i can see
[07:20] <wgrant> wallyworld: Any idea what's happened there? You can see on staging where the feature flag is disabled -- the old privacy portlet gets unlinkified by the JS
[07:20] <wgrant> stewart: Right, that explains the difference.
[07:20]  * wallyworld groks
[07:21] <wgrant> Oh
[07:21] <wgrant> I think it's the issue we diagnosed yesterday
[07:21] <wgrant> The <a> is there, but I bet there's a space.
[07:22] <wgrant> Yup
[07:22] <wallyworld> so it works in ff
[07:22] <wgrant> Yep
[07:23] <wgrant> Explains why we missed it.
[07:23] <wgrant> Only broken in the old UI in WebKit.
[07:23] <wallyworld> yes, the new one works
[07:23] <wallyworld> the new ui i mean
[07:23] <wgrant> Yeah, I always check that.
[07:24] <stewart> okay, well it's fixed my problem for now at least :)
[07:24] <wallyworld> a quick fix is as proposed in bug1012728
[07:24] <wallyworld> update the css to add the nbsp for all webkit versions
[07:26] <wgrant> I haven't seen any other breakage.
[07:26] <wgrant> I think we should just fix this case.
[07:26] <wgrant> Since the workaround relies on JS, doesn't it?
[07:34] <StevenK> Bleh. We need to hurry up and remove the old UI. :-)
[09:21] <mgz> can launchpadlib please stop using python-keyring which is completely daft...
[09:48] <zyga> mgz, what's wrong with keyring from your perspective?
[09:50] <mgz> it breaks all the time.
[09:52] <mgz> would be better off with something that just did the gnome wallet and fallback to plain ini, rather than code that messes up credentials encryption as fallback
[09:53] <mgz> fg
[10:03] <czajkowski> mgz: jelmer jam could one of you look at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/200307  please.
[10:04]  * mgz takes it
[10:04] <jam> mgz: my guess is he is trying to use a web ui? And it is confused because the projects don't look related, looking at the revs they do seem related.
[10:05] <jam> Certainly it doesn't sound like he is using 'bzr' for it, because I don't recognize that as an error we would give.
[10:05] <mgz> nope, doesn't make sense in a bzr context.
[10:06] <wgrant> Launchpad doesn't allow MPs between branches in different projects.
[10:07] <wgrant> OpenERP unfortunately has some strange ideas of what constitutes a project.
[10:07] <wgrant> So they have several, or even dozens of, projects containing the same codebase.
[10:11] <mgz> yeah, so that's a propse merge to unrelated branch message.
[10:17] <mgz> does he just need to push his branch to lp:~synerpgy/synerpgy-projects/synerpgy-extra-trunk instead of lp:~synerpgy/openobject-addons/synerpgy-extra-trunk or would that be too easy?
[10:18] <wgrant> mgz: Other way around.
[10:19] <mgz> he wants to merge into lp:openobject-addons/extra-trunk
[10:19] <wgrant> Right.
[10:19] <mgz> oh yes, I pasted backwards.
[10:20] <wgrant> Indeed :)
[15:17] <BlessJah> let's try again
[15:17] <BlessJah> (OOPS ID: 2356canistellaunchpad637) while loggind into stackoverflow using LPs OpenID
[15:17] <lifeless> thats not LP, I know it looks like it, but its actually login.ubuntu.com
[15:17] <lifeless> Uhm, lets see
[15:18] <lifeless> BlessJah: the irc channel #canonical-isd may have someone that can help you.
[15:20] <BlessJah> let's try on  #canonical-isd then
[18:29] <ncfiedler> Hi folks! Is anyone in here, to whom I can talk to concerning my launchpad account? I am not able to login anymore… :-(
[18:39] <ncfiedler> anyone by chance?
[18:51] <ncfiedler> #launchpad
[19:00] <dobey> what is your launchpad account?
[19:00] <ncfiedler> ncfiedler
[19:01] <ncfiedler> but unfortunately i am not able to login anymore
[19:01] <dobey> are you using the wrong e-mail address?
[19:02] <ncfiedler> i guess this might have sth to do with a merge with another account.. - i am able to login to the account ncfiedler-m - but this is the wrong one
[19:03] <dobey> oh, i guess you tried to log in with the wrong e-mail and created a new account
[19:03] <ncfiedler> i already tried out all posible email adresses, but i can only log in to the wrong account. all other possible emailadresses  are not registered with the account - like the password-reminder-mail tells me
[19:04] <dobey> fedora?
[19:04] <ncfiedler> when i use my emailadress<EMAIL_ADDRESS>i am logged in to the wrong account "ncfiedler-m"
[19:05] <dobey> yes that e-mail is associated with that account
[19:05] <ncfiedler> when trying to login with my fedora emailadress it tells me that the account doesnt exist
[19:06] <dobey> log in to the one you can, and ask a question at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion requesting to merge the two accounts
[19:07] <ncfiedler> ok, but can you tell me, which emailadress is associated with the account "ncfiedler" by chance?
[19:09] <dobey> i only see a fedoraproject.org address on it
[19:09] <dobey> https://launchpad.net/~ncfiedler
[19:09] <dobey> it looks to be not hidden, so you should be able to see it there too
[19:10] <ncfiedler> well thats curious, because when i try to use the forgot passsword function with the fedora adress, the email tells me that no account is associated with that adress..
[19:12] <dobey> i don't know why that would be. i can't really help any further at this point, either. so i think it's best to ask the question and get them merged, and if you still can't log in after that, ask a question why the forgot password function says there's no account
[19:14] <ncfiedler> This email address is however not associated with any Launchpad Login Service
[19:14] <ncfiedler> accounts. If you want to create a new Launchpad Login Service account using
[19:14] <ncfiedler> this email address, please go to:
[19:15] <ncfiedler> yes, ok thank you very much anyway!
[19:16] <BlessJah> what does it mean to have two accounts and how could it have happened?
[19:16] <BlessJah> it seems that it affects also me
[19:27] <ncfiedler> well i now have created a question in launchpad answers. i have no idea, how this might have happened! i just did not log in into my account for several month now. but i can not remember taking any specific action, that might lead to this mess...
[22:59] <micahg> hrm, I can't set a bug to invalid on creation :(
[23:00] <StevenK> micahg: How is that useful?
[23:00] <micahg> StevenK: you can't create series specific bugs :), default task is invalid