[15:59] <pavlushka> can I speak here in English?
[16:03] <pavlushka> http://ftp.tsukuba.wide.ad.jp has some of their servers down, I use this repo, so having problems, I know I can switch to other repo, just to inform :)


[02:39] <Valtam> have an issue on 12.04
[02:39] <Valtam> keyboard repeat is not working, even though it is enabled
[05:20] <qwebirc56370> hello?
[05:22] <qwebirc56370> I have a problem installing mythbuntu with my i868 processor, (asrock AD-2700 itx), the boot CD says "This Kernel requires an x86-64 CPU, but only detected an i686 CPU. Unable to boot"
[05:22] <qwebirc56370> any suggestions for getting around this? thanks
[05:24] <tgm4883> qwebirc56370, download the 32-bit version
[05:25] <tgm4883> qwebirc56370, on http://mythbuntu.org/downloads under Advanced change the architecture to 32-bit
[05:25] <Zinn> [mythbuntu.org] Download | Mythbuntu
[05:26] <qwebirc56370> that was easy thanks, I was thinking i would have to go from ubuntu first. easy
[22:14] <qwebirc46577> posted this on the forum, but having a heck of a time.  I have the latest mythbuntu version, an HVR-2250.  I have the card being recognized in the back end where i can add it, I can view TV in VLC/Kaffeine, but when I choose watch tv from frontend, it just flashes to please wait then back to the menu
[22:34] <tgm4883> kruzayn, we'd need to see some backend logs
[22:34] <tgm4883> pastebin them from /var/log/mythtv/mythbackend.log
[22:48] <kruzayn> http://pastebin.com/A4TngR1t
[22:48] <Zinn> [pastebin.com] Jun 23 08:00:00 Mythtv mythbackend[815]: I HouseKeeping housekeeper.cpp:225 (Run - Pastebin.com
[22:51] <tgm4883> kruzayn, if I had to guess
[22:51] <tgm4883> Jun 25 17:37:33 Mythtv mythbackend[2636]: E TVRecEvent tv_rec.cpp:3642 (TuningFrequency) TVRec(13): Failed to set channel to 1. Reverting to kState_None
[22:52] <tgm4883> since that is the only real error it seems in your backend log
[22:52] <tgm4883> Which means you need to go back into mythtv-setup and tell it what channel to start on
[22:52] <tgm4883> and make it something else besides 1
[23:29] <kruzayn> hmm, thanks.  what screen is it that I set what channel to start on?
[23:32] <tgm4883> kruzayn, 4 I thin
[23:32] <kruzayn> found it, thanks!
[23:36] <kruzayn> well that got me into guide atleast.  looks like it might have worked.  looking up


[08:13] <nubae> alkisg u around?
[08:13] <alkisg> Heya nubae, what's up?
[08:13]  * alkisg is trying google apps for my domain...:)
[08:14] <nubae> in my python code i'm running into  ¡a reocurring peoblwm when using gettext (the internationalisation module)
[08:15] <nubae> i keeo getting back global variabke "_" not defned
[08:15] <alkisg> Urm, I haven't done any internationalized apps in python, but feel free to describe the problem...
[08:16]  * alkisg also thinks nubae needs to change his keyboard layout :)
[08:16] <alkisg> stgraber has put this to italc-launcher:
[08:16] <alkisg> # gettext
[08:16] <alkisg> gettext.textdomain('italc')
[08:16] <alkisg> _ = gettext.gettext
[08:16] <nubae> yeah this keyboard sukcs quite badly
[08:17] <alkisg> Doesn't that mean that "_" needs to be assigned to gettext.gettext?
[08:18] <nubae> the problem I get is everything launches fine, but after -iget udeclared _ which is the translation delimiter
[08:18] <nubae> gonna see if itsnot just a suse thing
[08:20] <alkisg> nubae: see here: http://docs.python.org/library/gettext.html
[08:20] <alkisg> It says that you have to ***define***  "_" yourself, like stgraber did
[08:20] <alkisg> Here’s an example of typical usage for this API:
[08:20] <alkisg> import gettext
[08:20] <alkisg> gettext.bindtextdomain('myapplication', '/path/to/my/language/directory')
[08:20] <alkisg> gettext.textdomain('myapplication')
[08:20] <alkisg> _ = gettext.gettext
[08:20] <alkisg> # ...
[08:20] <alkisg> print _('This is a translatable string.')
[08:21] <alkisg> So if you didn't do: _=gettext.gettext, you need to do it.
[08:21] <nubae> yep mine is done exactly like that
[08:22] <nubae> i fear there is a missing tool somewjere
[08:24] <alkisg> That only applies to the current module, so if you have a lot of modules, you need to do it for each one of them
[08:24] <nubae> yeah I know... that part is done right
[08:25] <nubae> whats not done  right is this globall declaration thing... I wasnt getting htat always b4
[08:25] <alkisg> Want to send me the code to see if it runs OK in my ubuntu?
[08:26] <nubae> oh sre
[08:27] <nubae> im making a vifgial macine anwyway though
[08:27] <nubae> virtual even
[13:09] <phant0m_> umm any idea how to get to efnet from here pls??
[14:59] <sbalneav> Morning all
[15:06] <researcher> its night in India dear
[15:07] <researcher> but gud morning to everybody there


[15:35] <smoser> apw, workdir= for overlayfs...
[15:35] <apw> smoser, yes
[15:36] <smoser> it cannot be under upperdir ?
[15:36] <apw> smoser, it cannot
[15:36] <smoser> thats annoying.
[15:36] <apw> smoser, yes, it is very annoying
[15:36] <smoser> basically means i can't have overlay go to the root of a filesystem.
[15:37] <apw> smoser, in other places i have done like $upperdir-workdir, and where .. isn't on the same filesystem it fails to mount
[15:37] <apw> smoser, no indeed, it means exactly that, which is a royal pain
[15:37] <apw> smoser, i have tended to take the <dir> people supply and make upper and workdir in there
[15:37] <smoser> do you have  suggestion on how to determine if i have use workdir= ?
[15:38] <apw> smoser, i have tended to mount with workdir= and when that fails mount without, though if that is hard
[15:38] <apw> smoser, and in overlayroot, i believe that is hard because we build the fstab first
[15:38] <apw> smoser, then you can use version > 3.18.0-0
[15:40] <smoser> i dont think fstab is an issue. as we dont even write the "correct" mount options tehre.
[15:44] <cyphermox> hey, I've added a task for linux to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1408495; looks like any moving of a file on the underlying read-only filesystem of the overlayfs on the CD leaves behind a 0,0 character device of the same name; could someone check if there would be an explanation for this as an overlayfs bug?
[16:39] <cyphermox> apw: looks like my bug 1408495 is most likely a duplicate of bug 1410480
[16:41] <apw> cyphermox, yes given you had a c------- device, that is nominally a whiteout, and wrong, and the second bug yes
[16:41] <apw> cyphermox, i am working on that one right now, feel free to dup yours to it
[16:41] <cyphermox> alright, so I'll mark duplicate
[16:41] <cyphermox> thanks!
[16:57] <apw> smoser, it occurs to me where these are in tmpfs, that you can (and likely should) use V2 format, ie use -t overlay
[16:57] <apw> smoser, for the maas use case they are ephemeral right ?
[16:59] <smoser> maas is backed by tmpfs.
[16:59] <smoser> what is 'v2 format' ?
[17:00] <smoser> apw, ^
[17:22] <apw> upstream overlayfs format ... in v3.18 there are two filessytem overlayfs which is (in theory, and actually not right now) backwards compatible on disk, and overlay which is how upstream is doing it going forward
[17:25] <apw> smoser, ^
[17:53] <smoser> apw, does 'overlay' have the same symantics as overlayfs from client 'mount' ?
[17:53] <apw> smoser, yes
[17:53] <smoser> so just '-t' overlay
[17:54] <smoser> why did you ask about 'tmpfs' ?
[17:57] <smoser> oh. i see. because of data format.
[18:27] <apw> smoser, right, if the upperdir is empty you can use the new form cause you really have no old data
[18:37] <smoser> apw, would there be an easy way to know the format of the data ?
[18:38] <smoser> because if i try to be smart and "auto" select overlay rather than overlayfs, then i have to later on make the right choice.
[18:39] <apw> smoser, no none
[18:40] <apw> smoser, a filesystem with no superblock, it is a bit of a disaster
[18:42] <smoser> then i think its best to just be stupid, and not try to "help" the user at all.
[18:43] <smoser> apw, why would i want the new 'overlay' type for tmpfs ? ie, you're right we could make that decision, but why would i want to
[18:50] <apw> because the old one is going to go awy, for tmpfs, as it is ephemeral the new one is most appropriate because it is going to go away anyhow
[18:52] <apw> smoser, and the new form is upstream supported, and should be more reliable as a result


[06:48] <balleyne> I have a firewire audio interface, and have to chmod /dev/raw1394 every time I boot up. Is there a way to make these permissions permanent?
[06:58] <ailo> balleyne: What system are you on?
[06:59] <balleyne> ailo, I'm running Ubuntu Studio 10.04.3 LTS
[07:00] <ailo> balleyne: Ok. So, you're running the old firewire stack I believe. Have you tried ubuntustudio-controls?
[07:01] <ailo> It's not doing what it's supposed to though
[07:02] <balleyne> ailo, hmm, when I open ubuntustudio-controls, it has 'Enable raw1394 access' checked already
[07:03] <ailo> balleyne: I can't remember whether the user needs to be in audio or video group in Lucid
[07:04] <ailo> For firewire to work with the old stack, that is
[07:05] <ailo> balleyne: Did you mess around with the other settings on ubuntustudio-controls?
[07:05] <balleyne> ailo, well, my user is in the audio and video group, but /dev/raw1394 is owned by root:root
[07:06] <balleyne> ailo, other settings, nice percentage, I messed around with a year or two back to get the right balance, but haven't touched recently
[07:06] <balleyne> ailo, memlock is off
[07:06] <ailo> balleyne: Those will edit the wrong file btw
[07:06] <ailo> ubuntustudio-controls is buggy in this way
[07:07] <ailo> jackd should install a file in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf
[07:07] <ailo> While ubuntustudio-controls edits a file called /etc/security/limits.conf (if I remember correctly)
[07:08] <ailo> Make sure to remove any lines for @audio in /etc/security/limits.conf, and edit /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf manually
[07:09] <balleyne> ailo, ok, thanks. I've got things set in /etc/security/limits.d/audio.conf already, pretty sure I set them before ubuntustudio-controls was around (I started off maybe with 9.04 or 8.10, adjusted as I've upgraded, etc.). Things work fine on my system, it's just a bit annoying to chmod a+rw /dev/raw1394 every time I boot up, wondering if there's a way to make that automatic or to have it persist beyond reboots
[07:11] <ailo> balleyne: Yea, but if you used ubuntustudio-controls to edit memory amount, you will have edited the wrong file
[07:11] <ailo> In which case audio.conf is overruled
[07:11] <balleyne> ailo, ok
[07:12] <ailo> balleyne: So, just remove the @audio lines from the /etc/security/limits.conf file if you got them
[07:13] <ailo> balleyne: There should be a file.. /etc/udev/rules.d/60-raw1394.rules for firewire devices
[07:13] <ailo> This should add firewire devices to audio group
[07:13] <balleyne> ailo, yep, removing those @audio lines now
[07:14] <ailo> balleyne: But, the 1394 rules will only work if you're running the old stack
[07:15] <ailo> Which you must be of course
[07:15] <balleyne> ailo, so, my /etc/udev/rules.d/60-raw1394.rules file says: KERNEL=="raw1394",              GROUP="audio"
[07:15] <ailo> Right
[07:15] <ailo> I think that should be it
[07:15] <balleyne> yet the group is clearly root when I `ls -l /dev/raw1394`
[07:16] <balleyne> ailo, how can I tell if I'm running the old stack or the new stack? I do remember some things changing with upgrades a while back, but I am still on 10.04...
[07:16] <ailo> 1394 is the old stack
[07:17] <ailo> I think 10.04 uses the old stack by default
[07:18] <balleyne> ailo, ah, ok, yeah, definitely still 1394 then, I was thinking of the freebob / ffado driver change I think
[07:19] <ailo> balleyne: I can't help double check since I don't have my own firewire device at home. holstein, when active is the guy to ask
[07:20] <ailo> He's on Lucid, and uses a firewire device.
[07:21] <balleyne> ailo, ok, cool, thanks. I'll just chmod for now. :)
[14:04] <cbarth> lovely
[14:05] <cbarth> am all set up hello studio world :D
[14:21] <ailo> hello cbarth
[14:37] <cbarth> hi ailo
[15:20] <cbarth> babayall
[18:37] <misterxyz> Hi. I want the PulseAudio output to appear in qjackctr as e.g. ardour or audacious. Is there any possibility ?


[00:44] <AlanBell> one for jcastro https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=tWJ9YaTmoyg#!
[00:59] <jcastro> AlanBell:
[00:59] <jcastro> alan
[00:59] <jcastro> alan
[00:59] <jcastro> al
[00:59] <jcastro> alan
[01:00] <jcastro> al
[01:00] <jcastro> alan, alan
[01:00] <jcastro> alan, al, hey alan, al, alan
[01:00] <komputes> yeah, that's not annoying
[01:00] <jcastro> I know right
[01:02] <popey> ☺
[01:03] <jcastro> hi alan
[01:03] <jcastro> al
[01:03] <jcastro> alan.
[01:03] <jcastro> popey: how's the left coast?
[01:04] <popey> cold
[01:04] <popey> enjoyable
[01:04] <jcastro> wat
[01:04] <popey> its freezing here
[01:04] <jcastro> popey: send a friendly, yet trolly message to bacon for me
[01:04] <jcastro> do something like
[01:04] <mhall119> here too, I actually had to turn off the A/C and close the windows
[01:05] <jcastro> "the entire juju source tree got deleted." and "amazon decided to dump ubuntu" or something for me
[01:05] <daker> è_é
[01:06] <popey> hah
[01:06] <popey> he was sat next tome,just left
[01:06] <popey> oh, he's still here
[01:06]  * popey does it
[01:06] <jcastro> yeah!
[01:06] <jcastro> work it!
[01:06] <popey> done
[01:06] <popey> he's gonna call you
[01:07] <mhall119> ah ha
[01:07] <mhall119> jcastro: now ignore it
[01:07] <popey> lol
[01:07] <mhall119> or just tell him you have no idea why popey would say such a thing
[01:07] <jcastro> lol
[01:08] <jcastro> I hope he calls mes
[01:08] <jcastro> "Hey, it's like 8pm here, I am wasted, popey says 'hahah idiot, and go punch him'"
[01:08] <jcastro> popey: hell hath no fury like a horseman with total knowledge of his timezone
[01:15] <popey> he just walkedin.."popey, you're an asshole"
[01:15] <popey> mission accomplished
[01:15] <popey> do we have an accomplishment for that?
[01:16] <jcastro> popey: nice try
[01:16] <jcastro> look, I might not like his choice of music, sometimes ....
[01:16] <jcastro> but you'll never get horseman to horseman violence.
[01:16] <jcastro> hint: try holbach.
[01:20] <mhall119> holbach's just come back from 3 weeks of vacation, nothing's gonna get to him right now
[01:22] <popey> sounds like a challenge
[07:23] <bkerensa> Ahh I really do love Ubuntu's development process its so less chaotic than say linux kernel
[08:01] <dholbach> good morning
[08:04]  * popey hugs dholbach
[08:04]  * dholbach hugs popey back
[11:18] <czajkowski> dholbach: how was the drive?
[11:21] <dholbach> czajkowski, we got back at around 1, it all went quite well
[11:21] <dholbach> just a bit tired today
[11:21] <dholbach> how are you doing?
[11:21] <czajkowski> good thanks
[11:21] <czajkowski> looking out at the snow coming down
[11:22] <czajkowski> rearranging plans for the weekend due to it going to be a blocker on stuff
[11:23] <dholbach> I'm looking forward to tomorrow night :)
[11:28] <czajkowski> You Dj'ing?
[11:29] <dholbach> yes and celebrating my birthday, should be fun :)
[11:30] <czajkowski> yay :D
[13:28] <daker> https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
[13:52] <scott-work> good morning everyone, are the team reports still desired (i.e. should ubuntu studio start doing theme again) ?
[14:07] <jcastro> hey mhall119
[14:08] <smartboyhw> Hmm I need to make a blog post of the whereabouts of UDS-S
[14:10] <mhall119> hey jcastro
[14:11] <jcastro> mhall119: hey, I am reading about the 100 scopes thing
[14:12] <jcastro> and I remembered that the AU lens has a server side daemon too
[14:12] <jcastro> so just FYI
[14:12] <jcastro> it was so if it ever shipped by default it wouldn't pound on their site
[14:15] <mhall119> jcastro: yup, already aware and have a plan
[14:18] <jcastro> rock and roll
[15:59] <jono> dpm, mhall119 about set?>
[15:59] <jono> jcastro, balloons we are going to need to use our demo session for an app dev sync up
[15:59] <dpm> jono, yep!
[15:59] <jono> you are welcome to join if you like
[15:59] <jono> but you dont need to
[15:59] <dholbach> hey jono
[15:59] <balloons> hey hey
[15:59] <jono> hey dholbach!
[15:59] <jono> welcome back!
[15:59] <dholbach> thanks
[16:00] <jono> dholbach, can you join this hangout
[16:00] <dholbach> sure
[16:00] <jono> would be good for you to be synced upo
[16:00] <jono> cheers
[16:01] <mhall119> jono: ready
[16:02] <jono> mhall119, did you see the invite
[17:06] <JoseAntonioR> dholbach: hey, do you have an idea of who may want to do a 'You can fix bitesize too' session? I can contact him/her now
[17:07] <dholbach> JoseAntonioR, I reached out to two folks but both have not gotten back to me yet
[17:07] <JoseAntonioR> hmm, ok
[17:07] <JoseAntonioR> let's just wait then :)
[17:07] <dholbach> JoseAntonioR, maybe for now we'll just put it in the schedule with a TBD as the name
[17:07] <dholbach> I already started writing the announce text
[17:07] <dholbach> so we can get the news out on monday
[17:07] <JoseAntonioR> oh, great
[17:08] <dholbach> that'll give us a bit more than a week to spread the news
[17:08] <dholbach> let's make sure that some tech sites pick it up as well so we get a big audience :)
[17:08] <JoseAntonioR> yep, it has to be super catchy and everything
[17:09] <dholbach> let's chat on monday then :)
[17:09] <JoseAntonioR> sure
[17:09] <JoseAntonioR> see you then!
[17:10] <dholbach> rock
[17:11] <dholbach> now I'll check if xwax still works in raring or I'll be screwed tomorrow night :)
[17:33] <jono> jcastro, free for a call?
[17:35] <dholbach> perfect, seems to work fine - see you all next week - have a great WE! :)
[17:36] <jono> dholbach, laters!
[17:36] <czajkowski> dholbach: happy Dj'ing
[17:36] <dholbach> czajkowski, it will be :-)
[17:36] <czajkowski> record to upload it for monday music :)
[17:36]  * dholbach hugs you all
[17:36] <dholbach> yeah, I was planning to
[17:37] <dholbach> bye :)
[17:51] <jcastro> jono: I am! Sorry I went to lunch assuming you were sprinting
[17:51] <jcastro> jono: I am free whenever
[17:55] <snap-l> jcastro: jono: http://www1.rollingstone.com/hearitnow/player/anthrax1.html
[17:56] <jcastro> dude
[17:56] <jcastro> this is awesome
[17:57] <snap-l> I was wondering how Joey would handle it when I heard they were doing a cover
[17:57] <snap-l> But they've always been great with their covers.
[17:57] <snap-l> Got the TIme is one of my absolute favorite covers.
[17:58] <snap-l> wanted my band in high school to play it. They said it wasn't metal enough
[17:58] <snap-l> ;)
[17:59] <snap-l> Love the cowbell part too. ;)
[18:03] <jcastro> he does a Dio live cover on the big4 dvd
[18:03] <jcastro> he does not pull it off at all, it's terrible
[18:03] <snap-l> Dio is hard to pull off
[18:03] <snap-l> It's way more operatic than Joey is used to handling
[18:04] <snap-l> gotta sing that one from the gut with a little vibrato
[18:04] <snap-l> and it's way too easy to hit cheese when you're imitating Dio
[18:05] <snap-l> IT's like trying to imitate James LaBrie from Dream Theater.
[18:05] <snap-l> or Jon ANderson
[18:06] <snap-l> I would say Geoff Tate, but I've heard several other singers with that style.
[18:34] <jono> jcastro, will call in a few mins
[18:34] <jono> just wrapping a few things up here
[18:34] <jcastro> no worries
[18:34] <jono> but then I have a call at 11
[18:34] <jcastro> jono: so phone, no G+?
[18:34] <jono> we can have a quicck catch up, and then we can talk on Mon
[18:34] <jono> jcastro, G+
[18:34] <jono> I am back at home
[18:34] <jcastro> I can be fast!
[18:34] <jcastro> oh ok
[18:35] <jcastro> oh right ... you live there, lol
[18:40] <jono> jcastro, invite sent
[19:30] <jcastro> man
[19:30] <jcastro> unity on 13.04 is really quick
[19:33] <czajkowski> jcastro: don't you mean man dude :)
[19:36] <popey> i just updated to 13.04 too
[19:36] <popey> it's lovely
[19:37] <popey> love that we can disable workspaces easily now
[19:37] <jcastro> czajkowski: hah, yes, man dude
[19:37] <popey> also, awesome
[19:37] <jcastro> popey: hey so my pure btrfs thing is working out beautifully
[19:37] <popey> sweet!
[19:39] <popey> cant wait for raid5
[19:39] <popey> thats gonna make it triple awesome
[19:39] <jcastro> there's some error on boot, that you need to press a key to continue
[19:40] <jcastro> but it's like a grub thing and only like annoying
[19:44] <mhall119> jono: ping
[19:52] <popey> We over-estimated our ability to eat vast amounts of pizza last night
[19:53] <popey> so pizza for breakfast \o/
[19:54] <mhall119> I bet all the beer was gone though
[19:55] <popey> yeah! didn't even have room for the glass of water they brought
[19:56] <czajkowski> hmmm the snow is back coming down very fast
[19:56] <czajkowski> :(
[19:57] <popey> yeah, i have a video webcam in the garden
[19:57] <popey> keep checking it
[19:57]  * mhall119 looks out the window
[19:57] <mhall119> nope
[20:17] <jono> mhall119, just eating lunch
[20:17] <jono> feel free to type though
[20:20] <mhall119> jono: I'm smoking tomorrow, wasn hoping to try out your tracking app
[20:21] <jono> mhall119, ahh yeah
[20:21] <jono> will send over details
[20:21] <mhall119> cool, thanks
[20:21] <mhall119> also, it is on LP?
[20:21]  * mhall119 prepares to file bugs
[20:52] <jono> mhall119, nope
[20:52] <jono> this won't be open source
[20:54] <bkerensa> ;p
[20:54] <bkerensa> jono: how is the weather down there in California?
[20:54] <bkerensa> :D
[20:55] <jono> bkerensa, getting better :-)
[20:55] <bkerensa> jono: oh good :) its a beautiful sunny day with 37 degrees of wonderful warmth :)
[20:55] <jono> :-)
[20:56] <jono> balloons, just gonna make a coffee and then will call
[20:56] <balloons> yay <3
[20:56] <balloons> your going to need it
[20:56] <bkerensa> heh
[21:07] <jono> balloons, invite sent
[21:07] <balloons> kk
[21:29] <popey> *stab* *stab*
[21:29] <popey> flight bumped to 1AM
[21:29] <jcastro> popey: you can stay with me!
[21:30] <jcastro> "Send me to Detroit!"
[21:30] <czajkowski> popey: you at the airport or still at the hotel?
[21:31] <mhall119> "Send me to Detroit", you're not supposed to talk like a crazy person at airports
[21:33] <czajkowski> hmm my direct train from jons to mine which takes 15 mins now requires 2 changes and 50 mins :/
[21:33] <jcastro> "I would like to see Robocop, please send me to Detroit."
[21:35] <czajkowski> http://i.imgur.com/KFFHH.png ROFLOL
[21:35] <popey> czajkowski: hotel
[21:36] <czajkowski> popey: best staying there till the last min with al the changes.
[21:38] <mhall119> czajkowski: lol
[21:38] <JoseAntonioR> cjohnston: hey, should I fix #1101346 as specified in the comments?
[21:39]  * mhall119 is going for a walk, gonna get out of the house for a bit
[21:41] <cjohnston> bug #1101346
[21:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1101346 in Summit "Expose lp authorization cookie via settings" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1101346
[21:42] <cjohnston> jono: yes please
[21:43] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: was that for me?
[21:43] <cjohnston> sorry.. JoseeAntonioR yes
[21:43] <JoseeAntonioR> ok, will do now
[21:43] <cjohnston> ty
[21:44] <JoseeAntonioR> cjohnston: btw, I still have https://code.launchpad.net/~joseeantonior/summit/1073635-fix/+merge/132998 in the queue
[21:45] <cjohnston> ya ya ya
[21:45] <cjohnston> bug mhall119
[21:45] <JoseeAntonioR> I will!
[22:27] <daker> cjohnston: https://code.launchpad.net/~joseeantonior/summit/1073635-fix/+merge/132998
[22:27] <daker> i am ok with MP, can i merge it ?
[22:34] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: looks good to me
[22:36] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: thanks
[22:37] <mhall119> np
[22:38] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: btw, can you also check https://code.launchpad.net/~joseeantonior/summit/1101346-fix/+merge/143952 ? it's a one line change
[22:54] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: cjohnston: are we getting an auth cookie in local_settings.py?
[22:59] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: as per bug #1101346 yes
[22:59] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1101346 in Summit "Expose lp authorization cookie via settings" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1101346
[23:02] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: I'll approve on the assumption that the launchpad dev knows what he's talking about
[23:03] <JoseeAntonioR> ok!
[23:03] <mhall119> actually I'm not
[23:04] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: need to replace & with %
[23:04] <JoseeAntonioR> I'll change it, one sec
[23:04]  * JoseeAntonioR just copied and pasted
[23:05] <jcastro> I am finding popeycam strangely mesmerizing
[23:05] <popey> hah
[23:06] <mhall119> must be 18 years or older
[23:06]  * popey moves the cam
[23:07]  * popey points it at the mat by the door to see if the cats come out
[23:08] <JoseeAntonioR> mhall119: fixed
[23:08] <mhall119> JoseeAntonioR: thanks
[23:08] <JoseeAntonioR> to you
[23:19] <bkerensa> So I guess there is now a Android app that emulates Ubuntu Phone OS on the Play Store?
[23:19] <bkerensa> wow
[23:20] <daker> bkerensa: link ?
[23:20] <bkerensa> daker: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.tsf.shell&hl=en
[23:20] <bkerensa> they have a Ubuntu Phone skin
[23:21] <daker> ah i see
[23:21] <bkerensa> and with UCCW and TCF it looks exactly like everything that was shown in any of the Ubuntu Phone OS videos
[23:22] <bkerensa> daker: here is a video http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-UaQTuPJ0-A#!
[23:22] <bkerensa> though the mimic of the Unity launcher looks much improved now
[23:23]  * daker looking
[23:27] <daker> bkerensa: nice
[23:28] <bkerensa> daker: yeah but I still think for those who want the Ubuntu experience its better to wait on the image since thats just sitting on top of Android and consuming much battery
[23:28] <bkerensa> I'm not a big fan of using third party shells or launchers on android
[23:28] <daker> bkerensa: i can wait
[23:29] <daker> then i can buy my FIRST smart phone :D
[23:29] <bkerensa> daker: your not going to get a FF Phone?
[23:29] <bkerensa> :P
[23:29] <daker> bkerensa: dual boot hahahaha
[23:33] <popey> the Ubuntu phone OS shell is way more than just a launcher
[23:36] <daker> popey: what do you mean ?
[23:48] <popey> well, people are making things that look like Ubuntu Phone OS
[23:49] <popey> but they don't have the essence of what happens when you do stuff with the OS
[23:49] <popey> it's not just a launcher
[23:50] <daker> popey: yep
[23:51] <jcastro> I'm just looking forward to a non-java performance experience. ")
[23:57] <bkerensa> popey: Is it not all Linux and Open Source when it comes down to it?
[23:57] <bkerensa> with Unity?