[00:00] <tsimonq2> Oh boy.
[00:00] <tsimonq2> Virtualbox for both of you?
[00:00] <flexiondotorg> VBox and Qemu.
[00:00] <tsimonq2> What host OS?
[00:01] <popey> ubuntu
[00:01] <flexiondotorg> 18.04, the magnificent Ubuntu MATE version ;-)
[00:01] <tsimonq2> Hmm.
[00:01] <infinity> I blame MATE.
[00:01] <popey> Dead man walking - Unity on 18.04 here.
[00:02] <infinity> I get a reasonable res when I boot the lubuntu images with a default qemu cmdline.
[00:02] <tsimonq2> infinity: Even after install?
[00:02] <infinity> (key being "default qemu cmdline")
[00:02] <tsimonq2> Also, yes, it's fun to blame MATE. :P
[00:02] <flexiondotorg> infinity: It cuts deep.
[00:02]  * tsimonq2 runs.
[00:02] <infinity> tsimonq2: Install?  What's that?  That would require me to succeed with the installation.
[00:03] <tsimonq2> infinity: Hah.
[00:03] <infinity> Which is counter to trying to figure WTF the installer hates you.
[00:04] <slangasek> infinity: fwiw I'm pretty confident in the correctness of that ubiquity/plymouth change.  and I don't have commit rights on lp:ubiquity.  Should I wait until another committer happens by?
[00:04] <flexiondotorg> infinity: This mornings Lubuntu testing was brought to you ny Agramont Gran Reserva 2011
[00:05] <flexiondotorg> You'll enjoy a glass or four of that.
[00:06] <infinity> slangasek: I mean, I could just commit blind for you, but if you want a meaningful review at all, I'm pointing you to cyphermox/xnox as people who might be able to spot an issue with it, that's all. :P
[00:08] <infinity> slangasek: The former probably more than the latter, since I think he was the one who went through all the pain originally to try to make ubiquity kinda not hate systemd, ish.
[00:08] <slangasek> infinity: at this point I've done enough test boots to be confident in the result
[00:08] <infinity> slangasek: Alrighty.
[00:09] <infinity> slangasek: Shall I just add you to the team, and you can commit it yourself? :P
[00:09] <slangasek> infinity: actually the commit log says cjwatson on this one
[00:09] <infinity> Oh, I say that, but I don't have admin on the team.
[00:10] <slangasek> (with some back-and-forth between cyphermox and pitti on a previous attempt to fix this bug)
[00:10] <infinity> Sadness and woe.
[00:11] <infinity> And my ubiquity tree has one change shelved.  I wonder what bugfix I gave up on 4 years ago and forgot about.
[00:12] <slangasek> for an encore, would someone like to figure out why logging in as 'ubuntu' on a tty on the Ubuntu live image auto-logs in; but logging in as 'lubuntu' on a tty on the Lubuntu live image prompts for a password?
[00:13] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Have you tried pressing Enter?
[00:13] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I know that pressing enter works; the question is why it *prompts* for a password
[00:13] <slangasek> because Ubuntu does not
[00:13] <infinity> Why is there a lubuntu user at all?  Do we not just use the same casper setup for everyone?
[00:13] <slangasek> infinity: casper magics the username per flavor
[00:14] <tsimonq2> Hmm.
[00:14] <slangasek> otoh maybe if I tried 'ubuntu' on the lubuntu image it would also work there without a password prompt?
[00:16] <lyn||orian> slangasek, it isn't supposed to do that?
[00:16] <slangasek> lyn||orian: it's not supposed to behave differently on ubuntu vs lubuntu, no
[00:18] <lyn||orian> sorry for not knowing the main ubuntu behavior sorry
[00:18] <infinity> slangasek: casper sets a blank password in a first pass, then a systemd unit runs "passwd -d" to delete it.
[00:18] <infinity> slangasek: That service might not be firing on lubnutu.
[00:18] <infinity> passwd-del.service
[00:19] <infinity> Ahh, only if gdm3 is present.
[00:19] <infinity> Helpful.
[00:19] <slangasek> heh
[00:20] <tsimonq2> Who hardcoded that in? :P
[00:20] <slangasek> also why does it run passwd -d under dbus-run-session
[00:21] <slangasek> tsimonq2: darkxst, because he was fixing an unrelated bug
[00:21] <slangasek> (LP: #1561302)
[00:21] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1561302 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "gdm won't allow passwordless login" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1561302
[00:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Can haz better fix? :)
[00:22] <tsimonq2> Otherwise I can throw something, I guess. :P
[00:22] <slangasek> tsimonq2: sure, propose casper patch?
[00:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: OK.
[00:25] <infinity> Alright, based on the current state of the tracker, I'll release $world in a coulpe of hours, when the source ISOs are done spinning and the pre-published stuff to .pool has had a chance to travel the interwebs a bit.
[00:27] <tsimonq2> So then why is this a gdm3-only thing?
[00:28] <tsimonq2> infinity: I'll mark as ready soon.
[00:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: dcontainers (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2]
[00:28] <slangasek> tsimonq2: because it was fixing a bug in gdm autologin support, unrelated to autologin on tty
[00:28] <infinity> tsimonq2: it's a gdm3-only thing because *all* flavours used to have a blank password and that broke gdm3.
[00:29] <infinity> tsimonq2: So Tim fixed his gdm3 use-case to delete the password instead, leading to the new behaviour that Steve (and most people, I'd assume) find a bit more pleasant.
[00:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: stdx-allocator (bionic-proposed/primary) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[00:29] <infinity> And why we didn't just do that for everyone is anyone's guess.
[00:30] <tsimonq2> infinity: I guess I'm not understanding how https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1561302/+attachment/4634981/+files/casper-passwd.debdiff is specific to Desktop.
[00:30] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1561302 in gdm3 (Ubuntu) "gdm won't allow passwordless login" [Critical,Fix released]
[00:31] <tsimonq2> Oh.
[00:31] <tsimonq2> Duh.
[00:31] <infinity> tsimonq2: Context.  Several lines up are a test for gdm3.
[00:31] <infinity> s/are/is/
[00:31] <tsimonq2> Yeah.
[00:31] <tsimonq2> infinity: So once I have a proposed patch, how do I test this thing? :P
[00:32] <infinity> The most fun way to test casper is to boot with break=casper-top and hand-edit the bits in the initrd. :P
[00:33] <tsimonq2> Time to learn something new.
[00:33] <infinity> Honestly, no idea why he did this with a systemd unit.
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mustache-d [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[00:34] <slangasek> infinity: do you think we need to noodle / consult more on this regain_privs() change?
[00:34] <tsimonq2> infinity: What would be another option?
[00:34] <infinity> "chroot /root passwd -d $USERNAME" immediately after the user-setup-apply call seems like it would DTRT.
[00:34] <slangasek> or should I push it and we'll see what breaks post-beta2? :P
[00:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mustache-d [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[00:35] <infinity> slangasek: MP it and ask for input from Colin and Evan, maybe?  I blame them entirely for this.
[00:35] <infinity> slangasek: And I desperately want someone to be able to explain WHY this breaks instead of papering over it with our fingers in our ears.
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: mustache-d [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[00:37] <slangasek> k
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Bionic Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Bionic Beta 2] has been marked as ready
[00:49] <tsimonq2> infinity: Ship It™.
[00:50] <tsimonq2> :D
[00:54] <tsimonq2> https://code.launchpad.net/~vorlon/ubiquity/lubuntu-root-privileges/+merge/342766 <3
[01:08] <tsimonq2> slangasek, infinity: casper> Huzzah: bug 1761644.
[01:08] <ubot5`> bug 1761644 in casper (Ubuntu) "Delete the password for the live session on all flavors" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761644
[01:12] <infinity> tsimonq2: The unit itself might need massaging too.
[01:15] <tsimonq2> infinity: Why?
[01:18] <infinity> tsimonq2: The before and after might be nonsensical for some flavours.  I'm still unsure why this can't just happen in casper instead of a systemd unit, but Tim might have some reason for why it had to have exact timing late in boot.
[01:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nescc (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.5-1build1 => 1.3.5-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nescc [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.5-1.1]
[01:47] <tsimonq2> infinity: I'm a bit stuck on actually testing this thing. :P
[01:47] <tsimonq2> infinity: ELI5?
[01:48] <tsimonq2> (Well, maybe not ELI5, but a more verbose process would be nice. :P)
[01:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-maps (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1 => 3.3.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-maps [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.3.0-1]
[01:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-deldir (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1-14-2 => 0.1-15-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-deldir [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.1-15-1]
[01:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-mapproj (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2-5-1 => 1.2.6-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-mapproj [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.6-1]
[02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-mapdata (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2-6-1build1 => 2.3.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-mapdata [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.0-1]
[02:10] <darkxst> infinity, slangasek, tsimonq2 From memory the password was already blank but because casper added the user before AccountServices had started, AccountsService.UserPasswordMode property was not set properly
[02:10] <infinity> darkxst: Blank != empty.
[02:10] <darkxst> that is why it was a systemd unit (to wait until AccountsService was active)
[02:10] <infinity> darkxst: (oddly)
[02:11] <infinity> darkxst: casper sets it blank, then you delete it later, which leads to being able to log in without hitting <enter> at a prompt.
[02:18] <darkxst> which was better than the alternative of not being able to login to a user session through gdm or unlock screen
[02:18] <infinity> darkxst: Right, I'm not questioning the validity of your change.  And we seem to prefer that console behaviour too.  Which is why we're discussing how best to make it that was for everyone.
[02:20] <darkxst> infinity, for the general use case where the AccountService properties don't matter, wouldnt you just do it when adding the user
[02:22] <infinity> darkxst: I'm actually curious about this AccountService thing and if that might have been bad science.
[02:22] <tsimonq2> Feel free to steal the bug from me, by the way.
[02:22] <infinity> darkxst: Since the state before and after this patch weren't the same (blank versus no passowrd), maybe deleting it early is actually good enough?
[02:23] <tsimonq2> infinity: What's the status of releasey things? I'm getting tired, heh.
[02:23] <infinity> tsimonq2: It's publishing.  Not that you have to be awake for it. :P
[02:24] <tsimonq2> infinity: I sort of have to publish the release announcement for Lubuntu.
[02:24] <tsimonq2> Or start writing it, for that matter. >:P
[02:28] <darkxst> infinity, so long as AccountsService.UserPasswordMode==NONE when AccountsService comes up, gdm and gnome-shell will be happy and that systemd snippet could be dropped in that case
[02:31] <tsimonq2> infinity: This link is sane? http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lubuntu/releases/bionic/beta-2/
[02:32] <infinity> tsimonq2: Sounds about right.
[02:33] <tsimonq2> infinity: Do you have a soonish ETA or can I just set it to publish in two hours and call it a night? :P
[02:34] <infinity> tsimonq2: Should be sooner than that.
[02:34] <infinity> tsimonq2: Publishing source ISOs now, then need to double-check everything for sanity, push to frontends, and send my own announce.
[02:34] <tsimonq2> infinity: OK.
[02:34] <infinity> tsimonq2: I can't see that taking more than 30m.
[02:35] <infinity> Ish.
[02:36] <tsimonq2> One hour sounds safe.
[03:18] <infinity> slangasek: You still around?
[03:19] <valorie> infinity: will the announcement be in https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce ?
[03:19] <infinity> valorie: Final Beta goes to ubuntu-announce, not devel-announce.
[03:19] <valorie> ah, OK
[03:19] <valorie> thank you
[03:19] <infinity> But also, I'm hoping to rope Steve into it, cause I just got a phone call of some urgency.
[03:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: 37 entries have been added, updated or disabled
[03:25] <slangasek> infinity: hi
[03:26] <infinity> slangasek: Hey.  My dad just called with some panicky urgency.  nusakan releasy stuff is all done, just need someone to wait a "bit" for mirrors to settle and copy-pasta the release announcement.
[03:26] <infinity> slangasek: Maybe spot-check a torrent or two, but they all look fine on torrent.ubuntu.com:6969
[03:26] <slangasek> infinity: ok. source for that announcement?
[03:27] <infinity> slangasek: Source was going to be the artful beta-2 announce, copy-waste and edit.
[03:27] <infinity> slangasek: And probably drop most of the "for further info, see..." links for flavours, since most don't seem to have anything to point at.
[03:27] <slangasek> hum ok
[03:28] <infinity> slangasek: Nothing really should have changed (other than version numbers) from https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2017-September/000225.html
[03:28] <infinity> slangasek: Unless you want to call out the flip of server/live-server.
[03:28] <slangasek> infinity: so "request input for the beta announcement from the leads" didn't happen?
[03:28] <valorie> I can collect the links if that will help
[03:29] <infinity> slangasek: If you look at previous announcements, that doesn't seem to ever actually get useful input. :P
[03:29] <infinity> slangasek: So, no, it doesn't happen much, unless someone comes to me with a "this must be called out".
[03:29] <infinity> slangasek: Anyhow, I'm going to run.  Sorry.
[03:29] <slangasek> k
[03:30] <infinity> I'll quickly fix the header on releases.u.c first.
[03:31] <infinity> Fixed.
[03:46] <slangasek> infinity: ok, so what's the status of Ubuntu Studio?  it's not marked ready, is it releasing or not?
[03:54] <flocculant> slangasek: I was reading the studio mail list last night - and a really really late shout for help - I think they were wanting to release
[03:55] <slangasek> flocculant: "Wanting to" != "ready to", however.  can you point me to the mail thread, and maybe to someone possibly active right now who would have the authority to make that decision?
[03:56] <flocculant> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2018-April/008582.html
[03:56] <flocculant> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-studio-devel/2018-April/008605.html is the flavour lead thanking someone for doing the release note
[03:57] <flocculant> as for finding someone awake - no clue I'm afraid
[03:57] <slangasek> sakrecoer: hi
[04:08] <slangasek> announcement draft: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/BetaAnnouncement
[04:09] <slangasek> currently a fair number of broken links
[04:09] <slangasek> tsimonq2: will there be a lubuntu beta page? Is https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/Beta2/Lubuntu the right link?
[04:11] <slangasek> fossfree-, bashfulrobot: will there be an Ubuntu Budgie beta announcement we should link to?  URL? (please fix in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/BetaAnnouncement)
[04:13] <slangasek> fossfree-, bashfulrobot: looks like https://ubuntubudgie.org/blog/2018/04/03/18-04-beta-2 is it
[04:13] <bashfulrobot> slangasek: https://ubuntubudgie.org/blog/2018/04/03/18-04-beta-2
[04:13] <slangasek> bashfulrobot: ack
[04:14] <bashfulrobot> Oops, yeah, that one. Haha.
[04:14] <valorie> slangasek: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BionicBeaver/Beta2/UbuntuKylin
[04:14] <bashfulrobot> Thanks for checking!
[04:14] <slangasek> valorie: link fixed, thanks
[04:15] <slangasek> I don't see one up for Ubuntu MATE
[04:15] <slangasek> flexiondotorg: is there an Ubuntu MATE beta announcement we should link to? URL?
[04:16] <valorie> might need publishing
[04:16] <valorie> flexiondotorg: ^^^
[04:17] <slangasek> draft is up; please double check and send corrections etc
[04:17] <valorie> More inormation about Xubuntu Final Beta < ----- slangasek should be "information"
[04:18] <slangasek> I don't see xubuntu published yet to http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/18.04/beta-2/; since I'm not sure when the sync started I'll hold off on going hunting for that just yet
[04:18] <slangasek> now afk for roughly ~.5h
[04:19] <flocculant> slangasek: tbh I'm not overly concerned if it's not there - I don't (and don't like us) pointing at milestone iso's anyway
[04:19]  * flocculant rather has people use the daily
[04:22] <valorie> slangasek: first lin begins with Subject: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS (Bionic Beaver) Final Beta released -- do you want Subject: there
[04:22] <valorie> last line says "On behalf of the Ubuntu Release Team," but no sign
[04:22] <valorie> sig
[05:13] <slangasek> valorie: it says subject because it's the email subject header; there is no signature because I'll sign it when I send it :)
[05:14] <valorie> ok
[05:15] <valorie> without the other email headers it's not quite clear that it is quoting an email
[05:20] <slangasek> infinity: the checklist doesn't say to archive off older milestones, but surely that's the normal practice; and I think xubuntu hasn't shown up because the webservers are full
[05:42] <slangasek> ok publishing to the mirrors now unstuck
[05:42] <slangasek> more than just xubuntu was missing, but it's all coming in now
[05:49] <valorie> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/releases/18.04/beta-2/ is empty still -- but it will be there soon?
[05:50]  * valorie seeds all the torrents
[05:50] <slangasek> I hope it will be
[05:50] <valorie> ok
[05:57] <slangasek> yeah, had to prune some more dead wood from the image set
[05:58] <slangasek> xubuntu is up
[05:59] <valorie> so, you work 24/7 now, slangasek?
[06:01] <slangasek> heh
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [19ubuntu1]
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [i386] (bionic-proposed) [19ubuntu1]
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [19ubuntu1]
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [19ubuntu1]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mustache-d [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mustache-d [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[06:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted mustache-d [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (bionic-proposed/main) [2.30-13ubuntu1 => 2.30-14ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[07:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-14ubuntu1 => 7.3.0-15ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[07:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.30-14ubuntu1]
[07:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-15ubuntu1]
[07:53] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, I merged log4cxx, this upload drops two oldlibs, so can any AA please remove the old cruft?
[07:59] <flexiondotorg> slangasek: Sorry, just woke up. The UBuntu MATE URL will be  https://ubuntu-mate.org/blog/ubuntu-mate-bionic-beta2/
[08:07] <infinity> slangasek: Oh, I published studio, I usually mark them ready if they've done some testing (which they did), just didn't mark this time.
[08:11] <doko> slangasek, infinity: when will the migration freeze be lifted?
[08:17] <LocutusOfBorg> oh please kick out forever the "roboptim-core" rationale: --> introduces new bugs: #806873, #808455, #868974, #894838, #894842
[08:17] <ubot5`> bug 808455 in software-center (Ubuntu Quantal) "Software-center causes update-apt-xapian-index to fail on downstream distros" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/808455
[08:17] <ubot5`> bug 795708 in Nautilus "duplicate for #894838 nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in nautilus_window_slot_get_current_uri()" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/795708
[08:17] <ubot5`> bug 868974 in Bazaar "Confusing output from bzr shelve for the addition of a file" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/868974
[08:17] <ubot5`> bug 894842 in NUnit Framework "DynamicMock error" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/894842
[08:17] <ubot5`> bug 806873 in Linaro QEMU "qemu user-mode mmap can fail unnecessarily for 32 bit guest on 64 bit host" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806873
[08:17] <LocutusOfBorg> damn, debian bugs ubot5` !
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjfx (bionic-proposed/universe) [8u161-b12-1ubuntu1 => 8u161-b12-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjfx [source] (bionic-proposed) [8u161-b12-1ubuntu2]
[08:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-policy (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:36] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: are you actually doing something to make s3ql more likely to pass or just mashing the button?
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-policy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[08:44] <sil2100> I guess since we're released, maybe we should just drop the freeze block
[08:44] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, yes, I'm reading the code, but meh, *nothing* changed
[08:45] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm trying to get if it is actually doing a remote call to some unavailable website
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cookiecutter (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-1ubuntu2 => 1.6.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cookiecutter [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-2]
[08:47] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, sync octave-io? :)
[08:49] <sil2100> Laney, infinity: should I just drop the freeze block? Or do you still want it around? *hovers his finger over bzr push*
[08:50] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: unset https_proxt
[08:51] <Laney> sil2100: Yeah, drop it
[08:51] <sil2100> Done
[08:51] <sil2100> doko: ^
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, <3
[08:53] <LocutusOfBorg> do you know, 1.08 hours of train debugging this, and looking at the diff locally, and with the autogenerated one in lp
[08:53] <Laney> :D
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> I gave the debian maintainer 3 patches, he did apply one partially, not removing all catchlog references, the other on a different line level, generating a lot of noise
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> and on another package again one wrong
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> *just apply my patch* this seems a difficult task
[08:58] <Laney> if it's a repo you can commit to, "I've committed this patch, can you review it?" is harder to get wrong ;-)
[08:58] <LocutusOfBorg> and in one case he committed the right patch to the *wrong* package :)
[08:59] <LocutusOfBorg> 7 uploads in two days (and one upcoming now), for 3 packages, and his ddpo is *just* three packages
[09:00] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I spent a lot of times for that catchlog removal, by filing bugs, and team uploading stuff, committing when the maintainer is responsive is a waste of time, but considering how long it took... probably it was the right thing to do
[09:02] <LocutusOfBorg> so, back to "please kick out forever roboptim-core", and let log4cxx migrate with 2 cruft libraries removed
[09:03] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: btw, it's probably buggy that a 503ing proxy is a hang rather than a fail ...
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I mentioned *exactly* that point in the email I sent the maintainer
[09:03] <Laney> ♥
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> bug in the patch, but bug in the code
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> he is also upstream
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> "please fix ASAP, each test now requires 5h of machines time to run, because there is no timeout on the code."
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope I used the correct wording
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-raspi2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>6.4]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-raspi2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1006.7]
[09:08] <apw> ^ syncing derivative kernels with the primary
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s3ql (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.26+dfsg-3 => 2.26+dfsg-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s3ql [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.26+dfsg-3ubuntu1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libavc1394 [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.4-4build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgsm [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.13-4build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libskk [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.2-3build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lrzsz [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.12.21-8build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mppenc [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.16-1.1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt-assistant-compat [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.3-7build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rarian [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.1-6build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcompface [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.5.2-5build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libstatgrab [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.91-1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qpdfview [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.14-1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smokegen [source] (bionic-proposed) [4:4.14.3-1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librsync [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.7-10build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtscriptgenerator [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted minizip [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-8build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted smtube [source] (bionic-proposed) [15.5.10-1build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sysfsutils [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.0+repack-4build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whysynth [source] (bionic-proposed) [20090403-1.2build1]
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xsunpinyin [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.3-4build2]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yajl [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1.0-2build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snowball [source] (bionic-proposed) [0+svn585-1build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xprintidle [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2-10build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zephyr [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.2-1build2]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vorbisgain [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.37-2build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xzoom [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3-24build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jbigkit [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.1-3.1build1]
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted man-db [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.8.3-1]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dcontainers [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stdx-allocator [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[09:24] <doko> apw: linux autopkg test ping
[09:25] <Laney> looks like http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ fancy index has gone, or did I imagine that it ever had one?
[09:25] <Laney> just releases maybe?
[09:25]  * LocutusOfBorg is not remembering an index on that page
[09:25] <Laney> https://web.archive.org/web/20180101044114/http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ yeah I think I made it up
[09:26] <LocutusOfBorg> http://releases.ubuntu.com/ this one?
[09:26]  * LocutusOfBorg had a remembering of old "shipit" subdomain
[09:27] <LocutusOfBorg> damn 13 years ago, I got my first ubuntu cd
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stdx-allocator [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[09:27] <cjwatson> man-db> thanks
[09:28] <apw> shipit was how you asked for cd's i think
[09:28] <cjwatson> yeah, there are still remnants of shipit in the LP codebase
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stdx-allocator [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, yes, that was how the adventure started :) I was a knoppix user at that time
[09:29] <cjwatson> mostly for the "you seem to be searching Launchpad for how to get Ubuntu CDs" heuristic
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> with no internet, shipit was a good thing
[09:30] <cjwatson> shipit was a genius piece of PR really
[09:30] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah, damn yeah!
[09:30] <LocutusOfBorg> sending for free an usb key with ubuntu inside would be nice now :D
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (bionic-proposed/main) [1.5.17-3ubuntu1 => 1.5.17-3ubuntu3] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1003.3]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>3.4]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stdx-allocator [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stdx-allocator [i386] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[09:38] <acheronuk> seems a load of old defunct KDE4 stuff which was deleted from bionic has reappeared in the new queue in the mass "-fPIE" uploads
[09:38] <acheronuk> I trust they will be binned?
[09:39] <Laney> xnox: do we need block-proposed on systemd?
[09:40] <xnox> Laney, no not really; and i guess we had no need for it at all, due to freeze block anyway. sorry.
[09:44] <Laney> xnox: no worries!
[09:44] <Laney> https://bit.ly/2GHktE1
[09:45] <Laney> I cleaned up the ubuntu-release list - this should be more or less a good list to look at for bionic
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: stdx-allocator [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brlaser [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4-1]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.5.17-3ubuntu2]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:7.7+19ubuntu6]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fontconfig [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.12.6-0ubuntu2]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-dictionaries [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atril [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted caja [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu3]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libmatekbd [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-artwork [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.10]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted webkit2gtk [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.0-2ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wxpython3.0 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brisk-menu [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-7ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gtk+3.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.22.29-3ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-menu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zeromq3 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.2.5-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected caja [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wmctrl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.07-7build1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted totem [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.26.0-0ubuntu6]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ibus [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.5.17-3ubuntu3]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted k3b [source] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.3-0ubuntu2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-control-center [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-session-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jigit [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20-2ubuntu2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-indicators [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kde-config-systemd [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-3ubuntu2]
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-expat (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.3.15-4build1 => 2.3.15-4build2] (no packageset)
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-expat [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.3.15-4build2]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:20] <Laney> apw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/klibc/+bug/1760106 might be an ffe for you to review ?
[10:20] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1760106 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "FFe: Enable configuring resume offset via sysfs" [Undecided,New]
[10:21] <Laney> it contains the word 'linux' :P
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted stdx-allocator [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:27] <apw> Laney, blimey that is not going to be utterly simple, i've commented and asked seth to look at the patch kernel side
[10:28] <Laney> apw: alright, not actually clear what 'fix committed' on linux means - maybe the kernel part is done and just the userspace parts need reviewing?
[10:28] <Laney> anyways I didn't want to think about it myself, so thanks :-)
[10:29] <apw> Laney, no indeed, he may well tell me it is already in, i've not seen it go by, but it might have
[10:29] <Laney> the userspace bits will want reviewing as well
[10:29] <apw> yeah, them not having made it past pottering is a worry too
[10:30] <apw> and you know we have months yet
[10:30] <Laney> heh
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [4.13.0-39.44] (core, kernel)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-120.144] (core, kernel)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-15.16~16.04.1] (kernel)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wxpython3.0 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7] (edubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-39.44~16.04.1] (kernel)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-145.194] (core, kernel)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.13.0-39.44]
[10:59] <xnox> apw, Laney - it looks like the top entry in bionic-proposed upload at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/4.15.0-15.16 no?
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (bionic-proposed/universe) [6.4.0-15ubuntu1 => 6.4.0-16ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-145.194]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-39.44~16.04.1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-15.16~16.04.1]
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-120.144]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wxpython3.0 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-7]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7 (bionic-proposed/main) [7.3.0-15ubuntu1 => 7.3.0-15ubuntu2] (core)
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7 [source] (bionic-proposed) [7.3.0-15ubuntu2]
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-stringprep (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-3build2 => 0.8.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (bionic-proposed) [6.4.0-16ubuntu1]
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-stringprep [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0-3ubuntu1]
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-xmpp (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.2-3build1 => 0.3.2-3build2] (no packageset)
[11:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-xmpp [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.2-3build2]
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openorienteering-mapper (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-1build3 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openorienteering-mapper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yabasic (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:2.78.3-1 => 1:2.78.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yabasic [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.78.5-1]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-390 [source] (bionic-proposed) [390.48-0ubuntu1]
[11:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: The blog post? :P
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu3]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu4]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-raspi2 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1006.7] (kernel)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firefox (bionic-proposed/main) [59.0.1+build1-0ubuntu1 => 59.0.2+build1-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1003.3] (kernel)
[11:44]  * tsimonq2 notes to just have the wiki redirect next time...
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (bionic-proposed/universe) [7.5.0+18.04.20180321-0ubuntu1 => 7.5.0+18.04.20180404-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (bionic-proposed) [7.5.0+18.04.20180404-0ubuntu1]
[11:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-raspi2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1006.7] (kernel)
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-8 (bionic-proposed/main) [8-20180402-1ubuntu1 => 8-20180406-0ubuntu1] (core)
[12:01] <sforshee> apw: I've already reviewed and applied the kernel patch for bug 1760106
[12:01] <ubot5`> bug 1760106 in systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) "FFe: Enable configuring resume offset via sysfs" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1760106
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firefox [source] (bionic-proposed) [59.0.2+build1-0ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunar [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.15-0ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-8 [source] (bionic-proposed) [8-20180406-0ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04.14]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2]
[12:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (xenial-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu2.1] (core)
[12:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: imagemagick (bionic-proposed/main) [8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu5 => 8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: screen-resolution-extra (bionic-proposed/main) [0.17.2 => 0.17.3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-settings (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.1 => 18.04.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:31] <Laney> xnox: The userspace parts of that FFe still need reviewing
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-themes (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.22.16-0ubuntu1 => 3.22.16-1] (ubuntu-mate) (sync)
[12:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (artful-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3 => 1.1.8-3.2ubuntu3.1] (core)
[12:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pycryptodome (bionic-proposed/main) [3.4.7-1 => 3.4.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapper (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.4-1 => 0.5.4-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.4-3]
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock (bionic-proposed/universe) [62-1 => 63-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-jenkins (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.4.14-1 => 0.4.16-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-dashtodock [sync] (bionic-proposed) [63-1]
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-jenkins [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.16-1]
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sympy (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-4 => 1.1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sympy [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-5]
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-menus (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.0-1ubuntu1 => 1.20.0-2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin) (sync)
[13:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neofetch (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-1 => 3.4.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: papirus-icon-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [20180311-1 => 20180401-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brotli (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1 => 1.0.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brotli [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.3-1ubuntu1]
[13:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected imagemagick [source] (bionic-proposed) [8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu6]
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted screen-resolution-extra [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.17.3]
[13:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: imagemagick (bionic-proposed/main) [8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu5 => 8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu6] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dcontainers [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2] (no packageset)
[13:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dcontainers [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2] (no packageset)
[13:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dcontainers [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dcontainers [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dcontainers [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dcontainers [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.0~alpha.5-2]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-gcp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1003.3]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-raspi2 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1006.7]
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-raspi2 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1006.7]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pycryptodome [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.7-1ubuntu1]
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zeroc-ice (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.6.4-1+busterubuntu1 => 3.7.0-5] (cli-mono) (sync)
[13:52] <doko> ginggs: nodejs migrated \o/
[13:54] <ginggs> doko: it is beer o'clock!
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted imagemagick [source] (bionic-proposed) [8:<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-16ubuntu6]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-themes [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.22.16-1]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted papirus-icon-theme [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20180401-1]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zeroc-ice [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-menus [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.0-2]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.2]
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neofetch [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[14:19] <tsimonq2> I'M FREEEEEE >:D
[14:19]  * tsimonq2 passes ginggs beer
[14:19] <sakrecoer> thanks slangasek, flocculant infinity and everyone involved in fixing what we should have... sorry for the silence, among other things i'm sorry for.
[14:19] <sakrecoer> (refering to ubunstu studio beta2)
[14:24] <flocculant> sakrecoer: np for me of course ;)
[14:25] <tsimonq2> sakrecoer: Nice to see you. :)
[14:26] <sakrecoer> flocculant: by now i owe you a lake worth of freedom beer :) nice to see you too tsimonq2
[14:26] <flocculant> :)
[14:28] <tsimonq2> Freedom beer. Sounds like MURICA.
[14:28] <tsimonq2> :D
[14:30] <flocculant> yea right
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ibus (xenial-proposed/main) [1.5.11-1ubuntu2 => 1.5.11-1ubuntu3~xenial1] (input-methods, kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:35] <sakrecoer> well.. that wasn't my intent. i rather envision the sensation of a delicious thank-you pint, given as a thank you token
[14:36] <flocculant> and that's what I read ;)
[14:37] <sakrecoer> :)
[14:38] <sakrecoer> have to log off, just wanted to say the above! see y'all soon hopefully!
[14:38] <sakrecoer> o/
[14:38] <powersj> slangasek: there should not be an i386 iso for server in http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/18.04/beta-2/
[14:39] <powersj> and next time we should push the live-server iso instead
[14:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed/universe) [4.13.0-1023.25] (kernel)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1023.25]
[14:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: condor (bionic-proposed/primary) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: path.py (bionic-proposed/universe) [11.0-1ubuntu1 => 11.0.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octave-io (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.10-2ubuntu2 => 2.4.10-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octave-io [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.10-3]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted path.py [sync] (bionic-proposed) [11.0.1-1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apache-log4j2 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.10.0-1 => 2.10.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apache-log4j2 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.10.0-2]
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups-filters (bionic-proposed/main) [1.20.2-0ubuntu2 => 1.20.2-0ubuntu3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:21] <tsimonq2> slangasek: This isn't final freeze yet right?t
[15:21] <tsimonq2> I wonder why the freezeis still set...
[15:23] <rbasak> tsimonq2: it's normal to keep accepts manual after beta release.
[15:26] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: seeded things go in unapproved from now on for spot check. unseeded get auto-accepted by script/bot
[15:26] <acheronuk> I think?
[15:27] <acheronuk> basically seed stuff gets a sanity check
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[15:42] <nacc> acheronuk: i believe that is correct
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: git (bionic-proposed/main) [1:2.15.1-1ubuntu2 => 1:2.17.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-6.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:6.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[15:56] <tsimonq2> Oh. Right.
[15:57] <tsimonq2> That isn't documented.
[15:57] <tsimonq2> But should be... :P
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups-filters [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.2-0ubuntu3]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted llvm-toolchain-6.0 [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0-1ubuntu2]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted git [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.17.0-1ubuntu1]
[16:26] <tsimonq2> Wait, are there any docs in the first place?
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:26] <tsimonq2> Hmn.
[16:26] <tsimonq2> *hmm
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.13.0-1014.17] (no packageset)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[16:56] <doko> Laney, slangasek: you both have hints for udisks2, s390x fails again, need to update?
[16:58] <Laney> yeah, I tried to earlier but failed to bump the upstream part
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-ant-helper (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.3 => 8.4] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-ant-helper [sync] (bionic-proposed) [8.4]
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: javacc4 (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.0-1 => 4.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted javacc4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.0-2]
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pgbackrest (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.28-1build1 => 2.01-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pgbackrest [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.01-1]
[17:19] <flocculant> infinity: I appear to have an issue with software-properties, it no longer appears to deal with nvidia conf files, hence on reboot nouveau is still blacklisted and nasty 640x480 desktop : bug 1761593
[17:19] <ubot5`> bug 1761593 in software-properties (Ubuntu) "Uninstall left nouveau blacklisted" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1761593
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross (bionic-proposed/main) [19ubuntu1 => 20ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[17:21] <flocculant> ftr - someone else had the same thing :)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross [sync] (bionic-proposed) [20ubuntu1]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:24] <flocculant> infinity: also have iso's been set to build again? would like to check that boot time is fixed after Laney's fontconfig fix
[17:24] <flocculant> for Xubuntu that is
[17:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.13.0-1014.17]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bglibs (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.03+dfsg-4 => 2.04+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: guzzle-sphinx-theme (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.7.11-2 => 0.7.11-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: deepin-voice-recorder (bionic-proposed/primary) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bglibs [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.04+dfsg-1]
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted guzzle-sphinx-theme [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.7.11-3]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mailfilter (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.6-2build2 => 0.8.6-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: deepin-deb-installer (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2.4-1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mailfilter [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.6-3]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hashid (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.1.4-1 => 3.1.4-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: twinkle (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.10.1+dfsg-2 => 1:1.10.1+dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hashid [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.1.4-2]
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted twinkle [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.10.1+dfsg-3]
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: urwid (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-2ubuntu2 => 2.0.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted urwid [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rhash (bionic-proposed/main) [1.3.5-1 => 1.3.6-2] (core) (sync)
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ccrypt (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10-4build1 => 1.10-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ccrypt [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.10-6]
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: urwid [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ccrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10-6] (no packageset)
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.60 => 0.2.61] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[17:55] <rbalint> doko: i finished my libnfs changes and uploaded it to experimental/NEW and also pushed commits to https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libnfs
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.61]
[17:56] <rbalint> doko: the RFC lincense question is a tiny bit fishy, but if the release team would like me to i happily upload the package to Ubuntu and perform a mini transition before the release
[17:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: condor [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:57] <doko> jbicha: ^^^
[17:58] <jbicha> rbalint: does Foundations want to own libnfs for LP: #1746598 ? it's not really desktop expertise
[17:58] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1746598 in libnfs (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libnfs" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1746598
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 3.0.0-0ubuntu3] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ccrypt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.10-6]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [i386] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted urwid [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted condor [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [8.6.8~dfsg.1-2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rhash [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.6-2]
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:03] <rbalint> jbicha: since i'm the active maintainer in Debian i would make more sense own it in Foundations, despite mostly destop packages depend on it
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-voice-recorder [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [arm64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: deepin-deb-installer [armhf] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.4-1] (no packageset)
[18:07] <rbalint> jbicha: but i would welcome co-maintainers, too
[18:11] <slangasek> rbalint: team ownership for main should be based on what's reasonable wrt product ownership, not whether someone on a team happens to have relevant upstream experience
[18:11] <slangasek> (I'm not saying it's not reasonable for Foundations to own it in this case)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [1.175ubuntu1 => 1.176ubuntu1] (core)
[18:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zsh (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.2-3ubuntu2 => 5.4.2-3ubuntu3] (core)
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-deb-installer [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.4-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted deepin-voice-recorder [i386] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zsh [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.2-3ubuntu3]
[18:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu3]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults (bionic-proposed/main) [1.175ubuntu1 => 1.176ubuntu2] (core)
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libwx-glcanvas-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.09-3build4 => 0.09-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:27] <slangasek> seb128, flexiondotorg, jibel: I think we don't have anything in the ISO test cases that verifies proper operation of preseeded snaps, do we?  I've just been prompted to check, and I see that beta2 went out with the version of the core snap that was just reverted because of the interface autoconnect failure
[18:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libwx-glcanvas-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.09-4]
[18:28] <slangasek> seb128, flocculant, jibel: I'm not sure if that impacts any of the snaps that were preseeded; and it's not good that I'm not sure, this is surely something that should be part of the test plan and I don't know that it is
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2]
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: needrestart (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0-1 => 3.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:29] <flexiondotorg> slangasek You're correct, there are no snap specific test cases.
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu1] (core)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-modules-account-invoice (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.1-1 => 4.6.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-modules-account-product (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1 => 4.6.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted needrestart [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.1-1]
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-modules-account-product [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.1-1]
[18:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-modules-account-invoice [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.3-1]
[18:30] <slangasek> flexiondotorg: oops tab complete fail, that message was meant for you not flocculant
[18:30] <slangasek> flexiondotorg: do you agree that we should have some?
[18:30] <flexiondotorg> I do.
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-modules-sale (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1 => 4.6.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:30] <flexiondotorg> Each flavour should create their own. Ubuntu MATE needs a lot of work on the test cases, planned for 18.10.
[18:31] <flexiondotorg> We have some "internal" tests the QA team run through currently, which does encompass Welcome but not pulsemixer.
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-modules-sale [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.2-1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-modules-stock (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1 => 4.6.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-modules-sale-shipment-cost (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1 => 4.6.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tryton-proteus (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1 => 4.6.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-modules-sale-shipment-cost [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.1-1]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-proteus [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.1-1]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tryton-modules-stock [sync] (bionic-proposed) [4.6.2-1]
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu2] (core)
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu2] (core)
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu2] (core)
[18:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.176ubuntu2] (core)
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2]
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu2]
[18:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[18:45] <flocculant> slangasek: that's ok - given I kind of shepherd the manual testcases - useful to know things are likely to happen on there
[18:46] <flocculant> and while we don't have anything - I'd certainly agree there needs to be a test plan for them
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libgit-repository-perl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.321-1 => 1.321-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgit-repository-perl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.321-2]
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xen (bionic-proposed/main) [4.9.0-0ubuntu3 => 4.9.0-0ubuntu4] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server, virt)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: zeroc-ice [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.7.0-5] (cli-mono)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-7-cross-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [16ubuntu1 => 16ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted zeroc-ice [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.7.0-5]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [sync] (bionic-proposed) [16ubuntu2]
[19:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xen [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.9.0-0ubuntu4]
[19:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-defaults-ports (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.175ubuntu1 => 1.176ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.176ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.176ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.176ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.176ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-defaults-ports [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.176ubuntu1]
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cryptsetup (bionic-proposed/main) [2:2.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 2:2.0.2-1ubuntu1] (core)
[20:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: whoopsie (bionic-proposed/main) [0.2.61 => 0.2.62] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cryptsetup [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:2.0.2-1ubuntu1]
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted whoopsie [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.62]
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu1 => 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2] (core)
[21:53] <doko> what's wrong with<EMAIL_ADDRESS>?
[21:54] <doko> slangasek, Laney: ^^^
[21:57] <slangasek> doko: it says that gcc-7/ppc64el is not available in the release pocket
[21:58] <nacc> Setting up cpp (4:7.3.0-2ubuntu1) ...
[21:58] <nacc> that seems wrong
[21:59] <nacc> 4:7.3.0-3ubuntu2 is in bionic-proposed, perhaps it needs a trigger?
[21:59] <slangasek> yeah I would just retest with --all-proposed in this case
[21:59] <nacc> oh those versions have not much to do with each other, nm
[22:00] <nacc> but it still seems like less likely you really wanted to test that :)
[22:00] <slangasek> it's not clear to me from the log why it wants to upgrade gcc-7 packages
[22:01] <nacc> yeah
[22:02] <doko> ok, I'll retry things tomorrow, will be afk now
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mumble (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.19-1build1 => 1.2.19-1build2] (no packageset)
[22:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mumble [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.19-1build2]
[22:15] <acheronuk> slangasek: would you have time to look at LP: #1760347
[22:16] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1760347 in krita (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] Krita 4.0.0 for Bionic" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1760347
[22:19] <slangasek> acheronuk: acked
[22:19] <acheronuk> thanks :)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mumble (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.19-1build1 => 1.2.19-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mumble [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.19-1ubuntu1]
[23:10] <doko> slangasek: I see you tried to get libgpuarray autopkg tests succeeding. ginggs requested removal of that package. would that be ok with you? otoh, there's a new upstream
[23:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: saxonb (bionic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libsaxon-java (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:6.5.5-11 => 1:6.5.5-12] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsaxon-java [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.5.5-12]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jabref (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.8.2+ds-2 => 3.8.2+ds-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted saxonb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-2]
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jabref [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.8.2+ds-3]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbolt-tools (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1 => 0.9.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted thunderbolt-tools [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.3-2]
[23:43] <slangasek> doko: I have no attachment to any of these packages ;)
[23:43] <doko> cool, will sort that out with ginggs
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected pam [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2]
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (bionic-proposed/main) [1.1.8-3.6ubuntu1 => 1.1.8-3.6ubuntu2] (core)


[07:34] <dholbach> good morning
[08:41] <davidcalle> Morning o/
[09:05] <dholbach> salut davidcalle
[09:05] <dholbach> how's the deployment situation? :-)
[09:05] <davidcalle> dholbach: I'm testing db migrations on staging
[09:05] <davidcalle> :)
[09:06] <davidcalle> dholbach: I don't remember how to set up postgre locally for d.u.c, do you still have that doc somewhere?
[09:07] <davidcalle> (because, currently, it's exploding here and there :) )
[09:13] <davidcalle> dholbach: btw, since you have more experience that I do with django migrations, if I pass you the dbdump file, do you think you can give it a try?
[09:18] <dholbach> hum... yes - I can try
[09:20] <dholbach> http://pad.ubuntu.com/zdvmD4Ekb6
[09:36] <davidcalle> dholbach: thanks, I'm getting the db file from the server, it's taking some time
[09:37] <dholbach> sure, thanks!
[10:24] <dholbach> davidcalle, I started with lp:developer-ubuntu-com/production
[10:24] <dholbach> is that what's on prod?
[10:25] <davidcalle> dholbach: on prod, due to issues when using several branches (bzr doesn't want to merge cleanly) we have staging/162, hopefully this will get back in line after the next prod deployment
[10:25] <dholbach> ok
[10:26]  * dholbach starts over
[10:27] <davidcalle> the update will be (for now at least) to r164 (which is the big upgrade without post-deployment-fixes).
[10:33] <dholbach> ok
[10:38] <dpm> dholbach, davidcalle, victorp was pinging me about adding installation instructions for the snappy image of intel's thincanyon. But as far as I can see, they're live already, right? https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/snappy/start/
[10:38] <dholbach> intel nuc?
[10:39] <dpm> I thought they were the same thing
[10:40] <dholbach> I have no idea
[10:40] <dholbach> thibautr and didrocks published the docs
[10:40] <dholbach> let me ask
[10:40] <dpm> looking at the history of the page, davidcalle did the changes
[10:40] <dholbach> oh ok... I thought it was thibaut and didier in the beginning
[10:40] <dpm> ah wait, no perhaps didrocks
[10:41] <dpm> misread the history
[10:41] <dholbach> ^W^W^W^W^Wa team of French people
[10:44] <dpm> :)
[10:44] <dholbach> davidcalle, so I updated http://pad.ubuntu.com/zdvmD4Ekb6 and tried to explain how I went about things - I'm still in the process of figuring out the migrations story
[10:45] <dholbach> meanwhile didrocks wants a call, so I'll brb
[11:18] <davidcalle> dholbach: thanks!
[11:19] <davidcalle> dpm, dholbach, tell me when you know if the nuc page is the one you were looking for. I'll prettify it.
[11:29] <dpm> davidcalle, that's the one, yes
[11:29] <dholbach> davidcalle, I'm not quite sure what the question about it was....
[11:29] <davidcalle> dpm, dholbach, thanks, the question is somehow irrelevant to me, the page is screaming for a fix :)
[11:30] <dholbach> go go go!
[11:58] <davidcalle> dholbach: I'm giving your doc a try. Huge thanks for writing it.
[12:00] <dholbach> davidcalle, I'm not done yet :)
[12:00] <dholbach> the tricky part is coming up now
[12:01] <dholbach> and I'll do it after lunch
[13:47] <dholbach> davidcalle, can you try to replay http://pad.ubuntu.com/zdvmD4Ekb6 locally?
[13:47] <dholbach> I'll do it as well
[14:04] <davidcalle> dholbach: on it
[14:04] <dholbach> maybe we can talk with Mike later on when he's back
[14:04] <dholbach> and see if there's anything we can do to the migrations process
[14:17] <davidcalle> dholbach: pip-cache timed out :D
[14:18] <dholbach> wow
[14:18] <dholbach> that has never happened to me
[14:18] <dholbach> I guess if you want to work around it, just      ./env/bin/pip install -r requirements.txt --upgrade
[14:22] <davidcalle> it was probably my vpn acting up, seems to work fine now
[14:25] <dholbach> <3
[14:27]  * davidcalle hugs dholbach
[14:27]  * dholbach hugs davidcalle back
[14:28] <dholbach> davidcalle, I'd like to be sure we covered everything with the migrations which are faked or really run
[14:28] <davidcalle> dholbach: it WORKS, great work !
[14:28] <dholbach> watching it break is not so nice :)
[14:28] <dholbach> but I haven't found a way to work around it
[14:28] <dholbach> mhall119, can you take a look at http://pad.ubuntu.com/zdvmD4Ekb6 too?
[14:29] <dholbach> ... and see if it's OK and how you'd expect it?
[14:42] <davidcalle> dholbach: what we need to make sure is to have a way to answer "yes" to deletion of the stale migrations. The juju way of doing it doesn't work well with interactive prompts and "migrate --noinput" just ignores the question. Maybe something like http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18869414/can-stale-content-types-be-automatically-deleted-in-django
[14:43] <dholbach> good point
[14:54] <mhall119> dholbach: why are we editing settings.py?
[14:55] <mhall119> actually, let's go back further, what is all this for?
[14:59] <davidcalle> mhall119: local upgrade testing with postgre
[15:01] <mhall119> oh, I see
[15:02] <davidcalle> mhall119: I wanted Daniel's help for his expertise on migrations
[15:04] <mhall119> is rev 163 or 164 when the upgrade happened?
[15:13] <davidcalle> mhall119: 163
[15:14] <davidcalle> 164 is a fix that was missing to adapt to newer swift
[15:24] <mhall119> ok
[15:26] <mhall119> it looks reasonable, has it been tested?
[15:27] <mhall119> davidcalle: on line 19 you install django, but shouldn't that be installed by pip so we get a specific version?
[15:28] <davidcalle> dholbach: ^
[15:28] <mhall119> my only other concern would be a difference in postgresql versions between your localhost and staging/prod, but that's less likely to cause problems than Django
[15:42] <dholbach> mhall119, I copied it from README
[16:11] <mhall119> right, that's probably old and unnecessary now