[04:23] <ccheney> ok now at the point of needing soup-gnome bits enabled in soup
[04:24] <ccheney> so have to figure out libproxy build it and see if i can get soup-gnome to work
[04:40] <ccheney> yipee libproxy was straight forward rebuild after backporting webkit :)
[04:40]  * ccheney hopes soup-gnome is as well
[04:41] <ccheney> erm hmm this is weird
[04:41] <ccheney> its claiming missing proxy symbols
[04:41]  * ccheney verifies he didn't break something wrt to proxy in soup
[04:43] <ccheney> ah yea i had to comment it out in configure before
[04:44] <ccheney> wow that was easy :)
[04:48] <ccheney> isn't quite sure what to do to get it in the archive since its not setup to bootstrap
[04:49] <ccheney> i'll worry about that later
[04:54] <ccheney> ok that fixed the epiphany-browser complaint about soup
[06:07]  * ccheney is seeing weird errors :-\
[06:07] <ccheney> it can't find g_strdup for some reason which is already in hardy glib
[06:13] <eagles0513875> hey guys i have a question i was helping out by doing some dev work with the team and i was wondering if i backed up my .ssh folder and i still have the ssh key active on launc h pad do i need to copy just the .ssh key to my home folder?
[06:28] <ccheney> doh i know what i screwed up, ugh
[06:36] <ccheney> yep fixed the problem, heh
[11:34] <gnomefreak> asac: what is you ident user name?
[11:37] <gnomefreak> nevermind i found it
[11:54] <gnomefreak> you cant compress mp3s right? compress as in change the size to smaller like you can with files right?
[11:59] <gnomefreak> !info firefox karmic
[12:17] <gnomefreak> asac: we are upstream ubufox correct?
[12:18] <asac> yes
[12:21] <gnomefreak> than its not ubufox but keyboard mapping? :(
[12:22] <gnomefreak> i commented on bug 319410 but i will log back into email so it send it
[12:24] <gnomefreak> ok i posted it from web page rather than email
[12:24] <gnomefreak> let me know what you think or comment on the above bug
[12:24] <gnomefreak> coffee run
[12:29] <kecsap> asac: hi. can I reassign to me bug 123713 - package description needs rewrite? - also can you review at least the branch lp:~csaba-kertesz/ubufox/lp452948 because I can work on one or two bugs after it is merged.
[12:33] <gnomefreak> kecsap: i just commented on the above bug about the cancel, key mapping and i will add another comment since i forgot in my last post.
[12:35] <fta2> asac, xul 1.9.2 still red
[12:35] <gnomefreak> kecsap: feel free to assign yourself to the bug as long sa you will/are working on it.
[12:37] <gnomefreak> oh ok i see that some of the firefox's are cap.
[12:37] <kecsap> gnomefreak: micah told me to check that issue in the upstream bugzilla. but for sure, it is not an ubufox problem
[12:38] <gnomefreak> kecsap: ther eis no upstream source until we find out the package. that is why i asked about windows nad other things that use that cancel key map
[12:43] <gnomefreak> kecsap: where is your branch for the description fix? you only have 3 branches and dont see that one you posted above
[13:12] <kecsap> gnomefreak: I do not have any branch for the description fix because the bug 123713 is assigned to asac and wanted to ask him if I can reassign it to me.
[13:13] <gnomefreak> kecsap: if you want  to fix it i dont see any reason not to assign it to yourself and make branch and ask for a merge
[13:16] <gnomefreak> well i think i found the problem.
[13:20] <gnomefreak> i cant send emails and still not getting all of them. i hate to restart all over again :(
[13:20]  * gnomefreak gone for smoke
[13:24] <kecsap> gnomefreak: I do not see any problem also, but asac is the assignee. I assigned a back to me last week and got the comment from micah to ask the assignee all the time before reassigning. :)
[13:25] <kecsap> ...a bug to me....
[13:28] <gnomefreak> kecsap: ah i wonder why
[13:29] <gnomefreak> IIRC he is on lunch
[13:29] <kecsap> gnomefreak: because if a bug is assigned to somebody then probably the assignee works on that, even if the status of the bug is not in progress. I think it is straightforward.
[13:32] <kecsap> gnomefreak: I do not agree with you that the bug 503782 is not a dup of 123713. where did you read that 123713 is about a typo? it is about rewriting the package description. 503782 also asks for more detailed description.
[13:35] <gnomefreak> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/123713/comments/26  kecsap that has nothing to do with description
[13:37] <gnomefreak> ok i miss read a few comments
[13:37] <gnomefreak> marking back to dup now
[13:38] <gnomefreak> fixed
[13:41] <kecsap> ok, thanks :)
[13:42] <gnomefreak> kecsap: np
[13:43] <kecsap> gnomefreak: when did asac go for lunch and I can expect him back?
[13:44] <gnomefreak> kecsap: not sure but i think it is around his lunch time
[13:45] <gnomefreak> or maybe not :(
[13:45] <gnomefreak> asac: you here?
[13:47] <kecsap> gnomefreak: what about the bug of the shortcut of the cancel button?
[13:47] <gnomefreak> kecsap: that needs to be assigned to the corrct package. If it happens outside of Ubuntu than it cant be ubufox
[13:48] <gnomefreak> having email issues so if you comment i didnt get it
[13:48] <gnomefreak> give me a sec
[13:49] <kecsap> gnomefreak: because the cancel button does not have shortcut under WinXP/Hungarian version of Firefox 3.6 for me, it should be something core thing in the firefox itself.
[13:49] <kecsap> at least the ubufox is not the appropriate place to hack it for ubuntu.
[13:50] <gnomefreak> most likely however it needs to be tested with other apps
[13:50] <kecsap> but I am not 100% sure
[13:50] <gnomefreak> that way we can prove its firefox not something else
[13:51] <kecsap> I have not have time to check the plugin finder dialog codes in firefox.
[13:51] <kecsap> so far
[13:51] <kecsap> you refer with other apps to other mozilla apps like thunderbird?
[13:51] <gnomefreak> plgin finder in Ubuntu is ubufox
[13:52] <gnomefreak> that not mozilla apps as well (other browsers) konq. epiphany ect...
[13:53] <gnomefreak> example of other apps, anything witha  cancel button
[13:56] <kecsap> ok
[13:58] <gnomefreak> i know firefox comes with its own but i think we made ours to use ubufox for most if not all
[13:59] <kecsap> ok, now I go to home...
[14:00] <kecsap> bye
[14:00] <gnomefreak> bye
[15:29] <gnomefreak> micahg: 3.6 transition for Karmic? is it happening
[15:30] <gnomefreak> micahg: trelayne was asking about it. since you are the main FF person atm i ask you ;)
[15:30] <micahg> gnomefreak: yes, eventually
[15:31] <trelayne> thanks... gnomefreak . micahg, so do I have to install it manually?
[15:31] <gnomefreak> trelayne: ^^^
[15:31] <gnomefreak> trelayne: no it will be upgraded like any package
[15:31] <micahg> trelayne: PPA right now, archive later
[15:31]  * gnomefreak forgot about stable PPA
[15:32]  * micahg dented about it last night
[15:32]  * ddecator saw that
[15:32]  * gnomefreak missed it
[15:32] <trelayne> PPA ?
[15:33] <micahg> trelayne: see topic
[15:34] <trelayne> My concern is mostly about making sure that I can migrate my extensions, generally my profile info
[15:34] <trelayne> oh thanks!
[15:34] <micahg> trelayne: always good to have a backup when upgrading
[15:34]  * micahg had no issues, but others have
[15:35] <trelayne> ok so it should be as simple as copying over my profile directory.... thanks!
[15:35]  * gnomefreak gone for meeting
[15:35] <micahg> trelayne: for a backup, yes
[15:35] <trelayne> yes.. cool! Thanks again !
[15:52] <micahg> asac: for FTBFS rebuild in PPA with no source changes, can I just retry the build or should I bump version (NSPR thing)
[15:53] <asac> micahg: just retry
[15:53] <micahg> asac: k
[15:57] <ccheney> ugh i have private variables that already existed in old gtk in the new bits that want to use new parts of them :-\
[16:16] <eagles0513875> hey asac and micahg
[16:16] <eagles0513875> :) can i ask you guys a question re bzr ssh key that i have on lp
[16:19] <micahg> eagles0513875: why not ask in #launchpad?
[16:20] <eagles0513875> micahg: will do hope to come back to helping u guys soon now that i have dual boot dev partition :)
[16:20] <ccheney> grr the gtk bits cascade quite a bit too, at least i know how to make them work now after working on glib
[16:22] <ccheney> actually it seems it was another bug it just looked like the private issue
[16:23] <trelayne> micahg,  a little problem, I'm not running Karmic yet, so  add-apt-repositor isn't available to me. Is there another way to add the stable version?
[16:23] <micahg> trelayne: instructions are on the PPA page...
[16:24] <trelayne> ok thanks
[16:24] <micahg> hmmm..I guess there's no room for that in topic
[16:24] <micahg> trelayne: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable
[16:25] <trelayne> thanks!
[16:38] <fta> micahg, asac:  xul 1.9.2 still red
[16:39] <micahg> fta: yes, we have to wait for upstream to land the test patch in m-c before adding it I think
[16:39] <fta> micahg, ?? why, the issue is not upstream related
[16:40] <micahg> fta: I think that's what asac told me...
[16:40] <micahg> if I'm wrong, I can add it tonight
[16:40] <fta> micahg, it's a tar issue. the fix looks trivial to me
[16:40]  * micahg checks the latest ftbfs
[16:40] <fta> just add --exclude=\*.orig
[16:44] <micahg> fta: hmmm..maybe I was wrong about the error...
[16:46]  * micahg needs to pay better attention to the error message
[16:48] <micahg> fta: I'll test build on my way to work
[16:48] <fta> excellent
[16:49] <fta> just be careful about the parameters order, tar is weird
[16:50] <micahg> fta: but I'm worried about if we need to make more fixes to xul192 before release, can we still merge in changes below this or does this not matter with the upstream revision
[16:51] <fta> this workaround is unrelated, it should work even with older revisions
[16:55] <micahg> k
[17:22] <kecsap> asac: are you here now?
[19:42] <ccheney> asac: question for you
[19:43] <ccheney> asac: i have some bits i need to backport that modify the private data structures for parts of gtk, afaict that should be ok (i think?), but it seems to mean i would need to make the changes directly in gtk+2.0
[19:43] <ccheney> asac: meaning the private data structures are already there but they are missing members
[19:45] <jcastro> fta: sigh I always forget where your daily build scripts are
[19:45] <fta> jcastro, lp:drobotik
[19:46] <fta> jcastro, https://edge.launchpad.net/drobotik
[19:48] <jcastro> thanks!
[20:03] <fta> jcastro, any particular reason?
[20:03] <jcastro> fta: I wanted to pass it along to the mono-a11y guys who just set up a PPA
[20:14] <fta> good
[21:04] <asac> ccheney: what private data member is that?
[21:13] <ccheney> eg GtkIconInfo
[21:18]  * ccheney thinks we would be best off just merging all backport bits into glib/gtk that don't actually break abi
[21:19] <ccheney> but at least some of the things seem very hard to backport without putting them directly into glib/gtk
[21:54]  * ccheney has to go rest for a bit, meds wipe me out :(
[22:08] <asac> ccheney: what features of gtk_icon_info are needed?
[22:09] <asac> often you can also rewrite the code that uses that a bit
[22:21] <BUGabundo> boas noutes
[23:22] <ccheney> asac: yea will have to look at it closer to see if i can work around it