[00:03] <yofel> uh... I think Martin said it uses a lot less hacks to make it work and is supposed to be easier to maintain (I'm starting to doube the latter)
[00:03] <yofel> *doubt
[00:05] <penguin42> yeh I wish it would settle out already
[00:35] <SuperLag> When you're running a pre-release version, is it safe to just update and continue using that once the stable packages come out? or is it recommend that you do a clean install from media?
[00:38] <penguin42> normally safe to keep up dating
[00:38] <penguin42> you'll sometimes get a few things that haven't quite sorted themselves out; maybe extra packages that wouldn't have been installed or very occasional cleanups that were only added in later
[00:52] <SuperLag> is that stuff that would be fixed by an autoremove?
[00:52] <genii-around> Your mileage may vary
[00:57] <SuperLag> genii-around: annnnnnd.... what kind of mileage have you gotten with that kind of approach? Do you typically do a clean install on new releases?
[00:58] <penguin42> SuperLag: It's generally OK, but for example I remember a few releases back there was a package that was in by default in early releases, but just wasn't a required later on - I don't think it ever got autoremoved etc
[00:58] <penguin42> (it was also a real pain of a package - hence why it stopped being needed)
[00:58] <penguin42> but it's rare
[01:01] <SuperLag> Okay. Good to know.
[01:02] <SuperLag> I just haven't got situated in a way, yet, to where I've got all of my personalizations easy to redo on a new install.
[01:02] <genii-around> SuperLag: I have a testing partition where when a new release is in development, I copy my current working release and then continuously upgrade that. If I have a horrible fail I fall back to the working release.
[01:02] <genii-around> I did continuous upgrades from 6.06 to 12.04 this way
[01:03] <SuperLag> how many "horrible fail" experiences did you have?
[01:03] <genii-around> 7 or 8
[01:03] <penguin42> nothing that couldn't be fixed by a couple of hours of screaming at it and hitting dpkg hard
[01:04] <SuperLag> genii-around: ouch.
[01:07] <SuperLag> Are the rumors of a rolling release credible?
[01:07] <genii-around> KDE 3.5->4.0 was a terrible time for me...
[01:07] <SuperLag> or should I just put that idea out of my mind now? :)
[01:09] <genii-around> Maybe ask sabdfl when he does his next Q&A
[01:09] <genii-around> I don't think anyone knows for sure right now.
[01:14] <SuperLag> genii-around: do you like the idea?
[01:16] <genii-around> SuperLag: Not particularly. I think it makes it more difficult to troubleshoot when you are trying to assist users.
[01:19] <genii-around> If they are only using some PPA for instance that just installed a new package, that's easier to track down as an issue because you know all the other stuff is stable versions from standard repositories, etc
[01:40] <johnjohn101> libreoffice 4.0 shipping with the next ubuntu?
[01:41] <Pici> !info libreoffice
[01:41] <Pici> hrm
[01:41] <johnjohn101> is it too late to get it in?
[01:41]  * penguin42 would also like to know if that's going to happen; it would be nice - but I can imagine possibly a lot of work/too late - don't know
[01:42] <johnjohn101> crazy, said plenty of unity integration on the comments
[01:44] <penguin42> https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-prereleases   well looks like someone is working on it
[01:44] <johnjohn101> says there are deb package on the download site
[01:46] <johnjohn101> well says on this site that it will be the default for 13.04 http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2013/02/libreoffice-hits-4-0-adds-unity-integration-persona-theming
[01:47] <johnjohn101> still a number of weeks till 13.04 is released. i'll look for it then
[04:37] <SuperLag> If you have to reinstall... do you guys have any advice on how to do a faster post-install configuration? (your favorite apps, custom configuration, ssh keys... etc.)
[09:22] <carli2> where is that multitouch support i saw in this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Vp8_jetKEu8
[09:22] <carli2> I'm using the wetab and ubuntu does not react to my touch gestures
[09:28] <carli2> lol apport crashes when trying to report a crash in apport
[09:49] <rmi> Hi. I'm havin a minor problem with Raring. On my Thinkpad X230, I cannot adjust the brightness using the keyboard-keys. The UI pops up, but I can't get the slider down. Surprisingly, I can change it in the system settings quite well. Any ideas for a fix?
[09:55] <rmi> oh, okay, this seems to be exactly the same bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/1121951
[09:56] <rmi> But no solution.
[09:56] <carli2> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Vp8_jetKEu8 <- this does not work on my ringtail
[09:56] <carli2> is it fake?
[09:57] <carli2> or do i need an extra package?
[10:12] <carli2> btw https://plus.google.com/109111823024526116254/posts/AdfinBEPwPt
[13:25] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[13:25] <PrincessLuna> Hi  Intel Centrino 2230 Wifi, isn't working in Kubuntu 13.04
[13:44] <ikonia> PrincessLuna: what have you dont to debug it ?
[13:46] <PrincessLuna> ikonia: Nothing much, I only used the liveusb for a couple of minutes. I tried iwlist scan
[13:47] <ikonia> ok....so why are you using a development release and complaining it's not working without any debugging
[13:48] <ikonia> the point of using it is to find problems, get info and get any genuine problems logged with valid ingo
[13:48] <ikonia> ifo
[13:48] <ikonia> oops, info
[13:50] <PrincessLuna> ikonia: I have the intention of debugging it in the future. Its a new laptop I was testing. I don't have time for debugging it just right now. I am not complaining and I regularly test Kubuntu development releases for bug triage
[13:50] <ikonia> ok, so why are you saying it doesn't work
[13:50] <ikonia> debug it, find if it's a genuine issue, report the problem
[13:51] <PrincessLuna> ikonia: Because the system detects no wireless card
[13:51] <ikonia> so ?
[13:51] <ikonia> you've not debugged it
[13:52] <PrincessLuna> So I was saying it doesn't work. In case someone on the channel experienced a similar issue or knew of a workaround, or has already debugged it, they could provide some insight. That is the only reason I asked
[18:40] <smallfoot-> I do; gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences mouse-button-modifier '<Super>'
[18:40] <smallfoot-> then when I restart, it forgot that, and it still use Alt to move windows
[18:51] <jbicha> smallfoot-: what distro?
[19:05] <smallfoot-> 13.04 raring ringtail
[19:05] <smallfoot-> with gnome-session-fallback as desktop
[19:05] <smallfoot-> jbicha, which uses compiz as wm
[19:13] <jbicha> smallfoot-: ok Ubuntu ships a gsettings override to use Alt by default since that's what Linux users are used to
[19:14] <jbicha> I think there is a compiz bug where gsettings changes aren't "sticking", I don't know if that's been fixed yet and I don't remember the bug # offhand
[19:15] <smallfoot-> jbicha, the problem with using Alt is that it collides with many applications and games which renders them unable to be used, example Blender, Tibia, etc
[21:27] <smallfoot-> why isnt qt5 in ubuntu?
[21:28] <genii-around> I would suspect probably because the Qt and *buntu release schedules don't mesh well
[21:29] <smallfoot-> i suppose they could just package it and ship qt5 alongside qt4
[21:29] <smallfoot-> just package it and put it in repo now
[21:29] <IdleOne> go ahead
[21:43] <penguin42> smallfoot-: You mean like https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/raring-changes/2013-February/006042.html?
[21:44] <smallfoot-> yeah
[21:44] <smallfoot-> but whole qt5-* not just webkit
[21:44] <penguin42> yeh, I don't know where it's actually up to, but I guess it means it's getting somewhere
[21:45] <penguin42> also qtbase and qtdelcarative in that list
[21:46] <penguin42> and that was today, so it looks promising
[22:04] <smallfoot-> com.ubuntu.geoip geoip-url 'http://geoip.ubuntu.com/lookup'
[22:04] <smallfoot-> from gsetting
[22:04] <smallfoot-> please fetch that over https
[22:20] <ironhalik> my synaptics palmdetection sucks
[23:25] <penguin42> smallfoot-: You'll need to put a bug into launchpad to get it changed; but I'd have to ask why; are you worried about the information going out or coming back?
[23:26] <penguin42> smallfoot-: The geoip information is available to anyone who had your IP address and your IP address is there even if ssl is used, so what advantage is there of using https?
[23:27] <smallfoot-> penguin42, idk
[23:27] <smallfoot-> penguin42, idk even what package to file against
[23:27] <penguin42> smallfoot-: Where did you find that line?
[23:28] <smallfoot-> in gsettings
[23:28] <smallfoot-> but gsettings just store configs
[23:28] <penguin42> geoclue-ubuntu-geoip  perhaps?
[23:29] <penguin42> smallfoot-: But I think if you file it people would ask the same question as I did; why use https?
[23:31] <smallfoot-> idk, i just think everything should go over https
[23:31] <smallfoot-> prevents someone from returning a false value, which would mess up my geo data
[23:31] <smallfoot-> if im from germany and they return turkey
[23:32] <penguin42> smallfoot-: true; although the geoip things are only hints, they're quite frequently completely wrong
[23:34] <penguin42> it's about 70miles out for me here, and at work it's normally the wrong country
[23:38] <smallfoot-> console.log(a[b]['c']); // ['c'] is better written in dot notation.
[23:38] <smallfoot-> how would I write that in dot notation?
[23:40] <smallfoot-> oops, ww


[15:00] <rbalint> o/
[15:01] <cyphermox> hello
[15:01]  * vorlon waves
[15:01] <cyphermox> who chairs?
[15:02] <vorlon> I'll let someone else :)
[15:03] <rbalint> vorlon, that sounds like xnox  :-)
[15:03] <cyphermox> #startmeeting Weekly Ubuntu Foundations team
[15:03] <meetingology> Meeting started Thu Apr 11 15:03:16 2019 UTC.  The chair is cyphermox. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[15:03] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[15:03] <cyphermox> #topic Lightning rounds
[15:03] <cyphermox> echo $(shuf -e vorlon bdmurray xnox tdaitx doko sil2100 rbalint infinity cyphermox mwhudson juliank waveform)
[15:03] <cyphermox> tdaitx sil2100 mwhudson xnox waveform infinity doko cyphermox bdmurray vorlon juliank rbalint
[15:04] <cyphermox> tdaitx: ?
[15:04] <tdaitx> gah, incomplete, but here it goes
[15:04] <tdaitx> * openjdk-11 bionic security transition
[15:04] <tdaitx> - u-u fix for maven, netbeans, visualvm, jhove, jetty9, tomcat:
[15:04] <tdaitx>   - review changes, update documentation
[15:04] <tdaitx>   - test changes and upgrade scenarios
[15:04] <tdaitx>   - package, upload, coordinate stuff
[15:04] <tdaitx> (done)
[15:04] <vorlon> no sil2100
[15:04] <vorlon> xnox:
[15:05] <xnox> bug #1822730
[15:05] <xnox> bug #1823132
[15:05] <xnox> unblock sphinx testsuite on ppc64le/s390x
[15:05] <xnox> bug #1823382
[15:05] <xnox> bug #1816812
[15:05] <xnox> unbreak zsh FTBFS / autopkgtest
[15:05] <xnox> bug #1824342
[15:05] <xnox> tiny systemd upload being reviewed by infinity
[15:05] <xnox> subiquity merge proposals review
[15:05] <xnox> done
[15:05] <xnox> done
[15:05] <xnox> waveform,
[15:05] <waveform> * Pi firmware update to support CM3+ boot in disco (LP: #1824338)
[15:05] <waveform> * Pi bluetooth work: licensing fun, binary blobs, "vendor debug" strings ... but it works! (LP: #1824338)
[15:05] <waveform> * Pi First boot spec in review
[15:05] <waveform> * Pi Amazing spec reviewed, responding to comments
[15:05] <waveform> * Pi3 gadget PR for cloud-init seeding
[15:05] <waveform> * Bug for wiringpi packaging (LP: #1824370)
[15:06] <waveform> (done)
[15:06] <bdmurray> infinity: ?
[15:06] <infinity> Uhh, I lost track of time.   Someone take my spot.
[15:06] <bdmurray> doko:
[15:07] <doko> - disco main test rebuild, filing ftbfs bugs
[15:07] <doko> - cosmic main test rebuild, fileing ftbfs bugs
[15:07] <doko> - gcc* cosmic SRU updates
[15:07] <doko> - one android-* SRU update for openjdk-11
[15:07] <doko> - python* SRU updates for cosmic
[15:07] <doko> (done)
[15:07] <bdmurray> cyphermox:
[15:07] <cyphermox> shim review: Matrix42
[15:07] <cyphermox> fix lsof ftbfs in rebuild tests (LP: #1823430)
[15:07] <cyphermox> netplan bionic SRU re-upload to disable broken tunnel tests
[15:07] <cyphermox> netplan specs
[15:07] <cyphermox> ore mucking with c-t-b-m autopkgtest; failure not reproducible locally.
[15:07] <cyphermox> reviewing various pacakges, including MIRs: uwsgi, twitter-bootstrap3
[15:07] <cyphermox> investigating some grub2 bugs: http module; conffile handling
[15:07] <cyphermox> debugging oddness w.r.t golang packages showing up in lubuntu packageset
[15:07] <cyphermox> fwupd/fwupd-signed fix for component mismatches
[15:08] <cyphermox> + some secret stuff too boring to mention anyway
[15:08] <cyphermox> (done)
[15:08] <bdmurray> me
[15:08] <bdmurray> scripted the update of apport test crashes
[15:08] <bdmurray> further reduced the size of apport's content mapping pickle file
[15:08] <bdmurray> tested apport update in the staging Error Tracker
[15:08] <bdmurray> uploaded ubuntu-release-upgrader fix for LP: #1822886
[15:08] <bdmurray> reported update-manager bug re https LP: #1823410
[15:08] <bdmurray> uploaded B and C SRUs for u-r-u and update-manager bugs above
[15:08] <bdmurray> uploaded fix for issue with whoopsie-upload-all LP: #1824152
[15:08] <bdmurray> reviewed outstanding britney hints MPs for stable releases
[15:08] <bdmurray> sponsored an upload of probert to D for the server team
[15:08] <bdmurray> reviewed many an SRU as requested by people
[15:08] <bdmurray> done
[15:08] <bdmurray> vorlon:
[15:09] <vorlon>  * openjdk11 SRU discussions / shepherding
[15:09] <vorlon>  * SRU reviews
[15:09] <vorlon>  * unapproved queue reviews for disco
[15:09] <vorlon>  * mailing list discussions about package removal policies
[15:09] <vorlon>  * proposed-migration kicking of glibc blockers etc
[15:09] <vorlon>  * fixed pyparted's autopkgtests; then saw it was fixed in Debian and synced that; now the package FTBFS on armhf with FPE
[15:09] <vorlon> (done)
[15:09] <rbalint> * wsl-related discussions
[15:09] <bdmurray> juliank is out
[15:09] <rbalint> * tested release upgrade to Disco on wsl, it works! :-)
[15:09] <rbalint> * prepared patch for LP: #1821924
[15:09] <rbalint> * verified all remaining bugs for LP: #1702793
[15:09] <rbalint> * uploaded wireshark 2.6.8 via Debian
[15:09] <rbalint> * verified ubuntu-wsl sru-s
[15:10] <rbalint> * working on generic fix for LP: #1823872
[15:10] <rbalint> (done)
[15:10] <cyphermox> #topic Release incoming bugs (disco)
[15:10] <bdmurray> cyphermox: what about infinity?
[15:10] <infinity>  * glibc upload to disco
[15:10] <infinity>  * attempting to get the above migrated some day
[15:10] <infinity>  * queue reviews, queue reviews, queue reviews
[15:10] <infinity>  * archive gardening (nbs, priority-mismatches, component-mismatches, etc)
[15:10] <infinity>  * NOTE: Final Freeze is TODAY, if you need it in, upload in the next 6 hours.
[15:10] <cyphermox> oh, true, he wasn't ready before
[15:10] <infinity> (done)
[15:10] <infinity> There. :P
[15:10] <cyphermox> bdmurray: see, you can depend on infinity, he doesn't need to have the right topic.
[15:10] <cyphermox> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:10] <cyphermox> bdmurray: boogs?
[15:11] <bdmurray> there are some ftbfs since the last meeting
[15:11] <bdmurray> and then bug 1824342
[15:11] <infinity> I think xnox uploaded for that one.
[15:11] <xnox> bdmurray, infinity is reviewing upload for that.
[15:11] <cyphermox> I wanna look at the strace ftbfs.
[15:12] <bdmurray> I'll add the release task and untag that bug then
[15:12] <xnox> https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1534162
[15:13] <infinity> A pkg-config regression is mildly concerning.
[15:13] <xnox> https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/365739
[15:13] <cyphermox> infinity: check-print-options so maybe something new appeared
[15:13] <cyphermox> oh, it's a -0ubuntu2 though
[15:17] <cyphermox> bdmurray: so we're done with the bugs?
[15:18] <bdmurray> maybe we should have a look at the tracking ones since its getting late
[15:18] <cyphermox> ok, let's
[15:18] <cyphermox> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html#foundations-bugs
[15:18] <bdmurray> bug 1778844 - 3 pairs!
[15:19] <cyphermox> nearly a mahjongg
[15:19] <cyphermox> oh, looks like it needs sponsorage
[15:20] <bdmurray> Who could review the path then?
[15:20] <cyphermox> who wants to review and upload that?
[15:20] <vorlon> I could
[15:22] <vorlon> next one is LP: #1820840, which is fix committed by sil2100
[15:22] <bdmurray> then bug 1820840 - only 2 pairs
[15:25] <bdmurray> tobikoch: What does partially mitigate in your comment in bug 1820840 mean?
[15:26] <vorlon> doko: LP: #1820172?
[15:27] <doko> that should be worked around ...
[15:27] <bdmurray> should be or should have been?
[15:27] <vorlon> I don't understand what's to be worked around
[15:27] <vorlon> is this a build time test or autopkgtest?
[15:27] <tobikoch> bdmurray: it does not address all of vorlon's concerns in comment #3
[15:27] <doko> it's not clear to me if reducing the payload is the correct fix
[15:28] <vorlon> doko: ok; but that seems in any case like we should either close the bug or untarget it
[15:28] <tobikoch> bdmurray: but I guess it fixes that particular bug.
[15:28] <bdmurray> tobikoch: then maybe new bugs for his other concerns?
[15:28] <doko> then untarget. python3.x will get openssl 1.1.1 updates upstream
[15:29] <vorlon> tobikoch: can I remove core18 from the desktop seed?
[15:29] <vorlon> (I'm guessing point #2 is the hard one that's not done yet and we're still seeding core + core18)
[15:30] <bdmurray> doko: does untarget == won't fix for disco?
[15:30] <vorlon> I've untargeted now
[15:30] <doko> bdmurray: no, "python3.x will get openssl 1.1.1 updates upstream"
[15:30] <infinity> vorlon: I'd think the "can I remove core18" question is better posed to kenvandine.
[15:31] <vorlon> infinity: I'm asking whether tobijk's implementation makes the (wrong) seeding of core18 unnecessary
[15:31] <infinity> Oh, that would be me not understanding the bug then. ;)
[15:31] <bdmurray> doko: repeating the same words doesn't help me understand it better
[15:32] <vorlon> it's untargeted now; should we move on?
[15:32] <bdmurray> bug 1805490
[15:32] <doko> bdmurray: these will be backported to disco once available. so why close it as "wontfix"?
[15:33] <bdmurray> doko: got it so we'll fix it in an SRU. I don't think we have a good way of tracking that.
[15:33] <cyphermox> bdmurray: I still have it on my radar just no answer at this point
[15:33] <cyphermox> I can't reproduce the failure and the information I have doesn't really help
[15:35] <bdmurray> then bug 1811695
[15:36] <vorlon> bdmurray: from your comment on there, is this a disco-specific problem according to the error tracker?
[15:37] <bdmurray> vorlon: perhaps the errors bucket isn't loading for me atm
[15:37] <bdmurray> I think so though
[15:39] <bdmurray> Its probably SRU worthy
[15:39] <vorlon> then if update-manager will be broken for (some) users after upgrade, that's important to have fixed sooner rather than later
[15:39] <vorlon> can anyone take that on?
[15:40] <vorlon> ah, if it's just an apt lock and update-manager will try again later, not critical
[15:40] <gaughen> so can wait for julian-k?
[15:41] <vorlon> so should-fix but we don't need to get it assigned right now
[15:41] <vorlon> gaughen: I think so
[15:43] <vorlon> bdmurray: others to discuss?
[15:43] <bdmurray> there are still a coule of highs
[15:43] <bdmurray> bug 1796275
[15:43] <cyphermox> I had a look, discussed this with the desktop team
[15:44] <bdmurray> during this cycle?
[15:44] <cyphermox> they know what needs to happen re. whatever dconf keys need to be poked
[15:44] <cyphermox> yes
[15:44] <cyphermox> it should have been fixed already, but it's a rather large ugly script in casper
[15:45] <cyphermox> ok, it's in disco
[15:46] <bdmurray> version 1.403
[15:46] <bdmurray> I'll close the bug
[15:46] <bdmurray> How much more time do we have?
[15:46] <gaughen> 14 minutes.
[15:46] <cyphermox> next topic?
[15:47] <cyphermox> #topic Team proposed-migration report
[15:48] <cyphermox> #link http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs
[15:50] <vorlon> short list at this point in the cycle
[15:50] <vorlon> fuse, I think we agree that's not critical at this point
[15:50] <vorlon> otoh fuse-zip may wind up being an ignorable regression in release, judging by the glibc results
[15:51] <vorlon> multipath-tools, also not critical so probably ignorable
[15:51] <vorlon> update-notifier, somehow a regression, juliank uploaded but he's not around to follow up
[15:52] <vorlon> (also not critical for disco release, that's more important for trusty)
[15:52] <cyphermox> multipath-tools; yeah, ignorable
[15:52] <vorlon> glibc, discussed and being worked on
[15:52] <cyphermox> trying to debootstrap against debian
[15:52] <vorlon> pyparted, that's the wtf build failure
[15:52] <infinity> update-notifier is just a PEP8 failure, no?
[15:52] <infinity> That should be easy.
[15:53] <vorlon> infinity: are you volunteering to take it? should be easy but also not critical for disco release
[15:53] <cyphermox> weee
[15:53] <infinity> I'm fine with taking it.
[15:53] <vorlon> ok
[15:53] <infinity> But also, screw PEP8.
[15:53] <vorlon> the rest of the newer stuff, I think we can trust will shake out over the next week if it's critical for release
[15:54] <vorlon> cyphermox: next topic, I think?
[15:55] <cyphermox> #topic AOB
[15:55] <infinity> NOB
[15:55] <cyphermox> what other bidness?
[15:56] <vorlon> sounds like nothing
[15:56] <vorlon> :)
[15:57] <cyphermox> good
[15:57] <cyphermox> I'm waiting a couple of minutes to #endmeeting on the hour.
[15:57] <cyphermox> not.
[15:57] <cyphermox> #endmeeeting
[15:57] <rbalint> o/


[21:46] <Pendulum> hiya
[22:09] <AlanBell> hi
[22:09] <nigelb> AlanBell: !
[22:09] <AlanBell> nigelb!
[22:10] <nigelb> had a delayed but awesome trip back?
[22:10] <AlanBell> I got back, which is awesome
[22:10] <nigelb> hehe
[22:10] <nigelb> poor popey
[22:11] <AlanBell> what happened to popey?
[22:11] <nigelb> didn't he lose his ipod on the train?
[22:11] <AlanBell> argh, didn't realise that
[22:11] <Pendulum> yeah, that's what he said on twitter
[22:11] <nigelb> apparently he left it on the eurostar
[22:11]  * AlanBell has a bad feeling it was in the seat back thing
[22:11] <nigelb> I did say 'good riddance' as I did for the guy who lost his iphone at uds :D
[22:12] <AlanBell> it was a nice little green ipod
[22:12] <nigelb> AlanBell: the pouch kinda thingy on the seat in front of you?
[22:13] <AlanBell> well it was in the headrest of the seat in front, just tucked into a flap of fabric
[22:13] <nigelb> ouch :(
[22:13] <nigelb> yaay, more and more photos are getting uploaded :)
[22:14] <AlanBell> where?
[22:14] <nigelb> facebook
[22:14] <nigelb> jontheEchidna just posted a few
[22:14] <nigelb> I reposted them, so should be able to see them
[22:15]  * nigelb should be thinking of sleeping instead of working on cleansweep
[22:16]  * AlanBell is not entirely sure that recolections of last night are all 100% present and accurate
[22:16] <popey> :)
[22:17] <nigelb> I guess you all took Jono's words seriously
[22:17] <nigelb> 'lets get seriously drunk people'
[22:17] <Pendulum> I remember last night
[22:18] <Pendulum> oh, dear, poor pleia2 missed her connection due to a flight delay :(
[22:19] <nigelb> Pendulum: oh no
[22:19] <nigelb> what's she gonna do?
[22:19] <popey> I'm amazed I managed to get out of bed each morning
[22:19] <popey> i dont think I went to bed before 2am on any night
[22:19] <Pendulum> nigelb: they're rebooking her
[22:20] <Pendulum> I went to bed early sunday and monday nights (as in before midnight)
[22:20] <nigelb> popey: OMG! Where were you? out partying in Brussels?
[22:20] <Pendulum> but after that...
[22:20] <nigelb> Pendulum: lol
[22:20] <Pendulum> got 2 hours last night
[22:20] <popey> nigelb: mostly in the hotel
[22:20] <popey> last night i was interviewing people
[22:20] <nigelb> popey: after getting drunk?
[22:20] <Pendulum> popey: I'm excited to hear those interviews!
[22:20] <popey> yeah
[22:20] <popey> one interview has been dropped
[22:20] <popey> because we were both drunk
[22:20] <nigelb> hahaha
[22:20] <popey> but recorded quite a few good ones
[22:21]  * nigelb looks forward to seeing them
[22:21] <popey> they're audio ones
[22:21] <popey> to go in the podcast
[22:21] <nigelb> oh well, I'll miss seing bloshot eyes and poor hand eye coordination
[22:22] <popey> heh
[22:22] <popey> i have no recollection of my mumbuntu talk
[22:22] <Pendulum> aww... the mumbuntu talk was good
[22:22] <popey> which is annoying because they didnt edit the video for it
[22:22] <nigelb> hahaha, that explains the extent of drunk you went into
[22:22] <popey> might be able to get it raw
[22:23] <AlanBell> were all the lightnings recorded then?
[22:23] <nigelb> yes
[22:23] <nigelb> all plenaries will be recorded
[22:24] <nigelb> the blip.tv is up-to-date till thu
[22:24] <popey> yeah
[22:24] <popey> I'm the one maintaining that :)
[22:24] <popey> the video company didnt have time to edit everything
[22:24] <nigelb> Oh, I didnt know that
[22:24] <popey> i think they will make the raw video available
[22:25] <popey> i will ask for it and maybe get people to edit it in a crowd source way
[22:25] <nigelb> where will it be available?
[22:25] <nigelb> I can help out a bit with editing
[22:25] <popey> ok, will try to get hold of it and ask for help online
[22:25] <popey> thanks nigelb
[22:25] <nigelb> hm, why didn't the hilight work there
[22:26] <nigelb> !ping | nigelb
[22:26] <ubot2> nigelb, please see my private message
[22:26] <nigelb> awesome, works now :)
[22:29] <AlanBell> there are interviews with czajkowski pleia2 akgraner up on http://ubuntudevelopers.blip.tv/posts?view=archive&nsfw=dc
[22:29]  * nigelb already saw that
[22:32]  * nigelb heads to bed, 3 am, sigh
[22:33] <popey> nn nigelb
[22:50]  * Kor1sh Discounts!! Our Special Limited Time Offers Up To May,22!!!New BranD!! Notebooks,Plasma and LCD TV's.Buy your electronic needs at our unique prices. Laptop Sony VAIO® VGN-FW590FFD-575,57$!!!Apple MacBook® Air MC234LL/A-695,27$!!! http://www.elplace.com/
[22:51] <maco> argh
[22:52] <AlanBell> lot of that today
[22:52] <maco> (to keep out the spam)
[23:19] <Pendulum> I am a very much fan of the schedule with the "UDS Hangover" week included


[06:10] <AskUbuntu> Can not install juju from "go install" | http://askubuntu.com/q/600133
[08:52] <AskUbuntu> juju no matching tools found for constraint | http://askubuntu.com/q/600168
[12:26] <schkovich> how one can suggest enchantment to juju documentation? open ticket at launchpad?
[12:47] <rick_h_> schkovich: submit an issue or a pull request here: https://github.com/juju/docs thanks!
[12:48] <schkovich> ok
[12:48] <schkovich> will do
[15:28] <apuimedo> gnuoy: are the test_utils of neutron-api in any pip package like charm-helpers?
[15:28] <apuimedo> They are quite handy and I would prefer not having to copy them around ;-)
[15:28] <gnuoy> no, I don't believe they ever made it over there
[15:28] <gnuoy> apuimedo, yes, agreed
[15:29] <apuimedo> ok, so for the moment I'll copy test_utils to my charms
[15:29] <apuimedo> gnuoy: should I file a bug for it to be included in charmhelpers?
[15:30] <gnuoy> apuimedo, good plan
[15:30] <apuimedo> gnuoy: do you have some license header I can put on it?
[15:34] <ctlaugh> Hello, I am curious about the timeline of when changes make it into the release version of charms.  I have a proposed change pending review, and was wondering if I could expect it to be picked up before the next release, or if it's too late.
[15:34] <apuimedo> ctlaugh: for the most official charms the releases are on april and october
[15:35] <apuimedo> so...
[15:35] <apuimedo> tight tight
[15:35] <ctlaugh> apuimedo: This is for nova-compute
[15:35] <apuimedo> yup, this is one of those ;-)
[15:35] <ctlaugh> I submitted it on 3/12
[15:37] <apuimedo> ctlaugh: I'm not on the openstack charmers team, gnuoy is
[15:55] <lukasa> If I deploy multiple of the same charm at once, will Juju run each one's 'event loop' (for want of a better term) individually? Put another way, may multiple charm instances be processing their 'start' hooks at the same time?
[16:12] <jose> hey marcoceppi_, ~nicopace/trusty/mysql/scaling-test is still on revq but not existant
[16:12] <marcoceppi_> jose: ta, removing
[16:15] <jose> marcoceppi_: same with niedbalski/trusty/memcached/replication, paulgear/trusty/nrpe-external-master/fix-duplicate-rsync-entries, matsubara/trusty/mysql/bug-1410847
[16:17] <marcoceppi_> jose: thanks, removed
[16:17] <jose> thanks!
[18:56] <jose> who should I talk to about the ci builds?
[19:35] <lp|sprint> jose: wrt testing?
[20:01] <jrwren> any charmers have examples of charms using charmhelpers Services Framework? I'd like to see an example other than MySQL :)
[21:52] <aisrael> jrwren: yes. https://github.com/juju-solutions/siege
[21:52] <jrwren> aisrael: thank you.
[21:53] <aisrael> jrwren: np. I've been digging into it a lot lately, so feel free to ping me.
[21:53] <jrwren> aisrael: ooh! actions!
[21:53] <jrwren> is that in an official release now?
[21:53] <aisrael> jrwren: it's in 1.23, which just released alpha
[21:53] <jrwren> excellent!
[21:59] <lp|sprint> aisrael: yo
[22:00] <aisrael> lp|sprint: Yoooooooo
[22:00] <lp|sprint> https://code.launchpad.net/~aisrael/charms/trusty/memcached/noipv6/+merge/249707 <- dirty merge. Looks like it changed from underneath you - can you confirm its still applicable?
[22:01] <aisrael> lp|sprint: Yeah, I need to revisit that. I'm not sure that's a valid fix anymore.
[22:01] <lp|sprint> ack. will comment as so - Thanks for taking a look
[22:25] <AskUbuntu> juju Provisioning in parallel or multicasting | http://askubuntu.com/q/600430
[22:34] <jcastro> cory_fu, http://askubuntu.com/questions/595511/where-can-i-find-documentation-about-the-python-charm-helpers
[22:36] <cory_fu> The first link in that question is the correct docs, we just need to make that more obvious in our docs
[22:44] <cory_fu> tvansteenburgh: https://github.com/whitmo/jujubox/blob/master/charmbox.md
[22:44] <cory_fu> The only change I had to make to the docker run command was adding "--net=host"
[23:52] <jose> lp|sprint: yes, wrt testing. one of my tests got aborted on ci directly


[03:18] <\lart> Greetings all.  Planning to build a new server at home.  Trying to decide between an Opteron vs an Athlon 64 X2.  Both dual core, both 2.8 Ghz clock.  Haven't touched an AMD CPU since a K5.  I'm guessing the Opteron's the better choice - true?
[03:25] <_derspankster> a lot of horsepower for a home server
[03:27] <CarlF1> i just installed u-server.  what package do I install so usb drives get mounted when I plug them in, in the say way as u-desktop, which uses the drives disk label or something
[03:30] <rhineheart_m> how to configure mod_security in ubuntu-server?
[03:59] <_derspankster> vlc cannot open avi files from my server, Totem can. I'd rather use vlc but can;t make it work.
[03:59] <_derspankster> vlc on my wife's XP computer works just fine
[04:51] <osmosis> Any ideas why php5 isnt seeing the php5-imagick module even though it is installed ?
[04:53] <osmosis> how do I list the config files a package installed ?
[05:17] <virtualroadside> im pretty sure i've ran out of entropy
[05:22] <osmosis> jeos is giving me this  "WARNING: The following packages cannot authenticate!"
[05:23] <osmosis> does 32 bit constrict the entire system to only 4GB of RAM usage?
[05:37] <osmosis> anyone know how to fix the imagick issue on hardy ?
[05:58] <lucent> I hope I'm in the right crowd tonight - Is install to md RAID1 supported by the installer? I did not see it in the options
[05:59] <lucent> couldn't find an example of anyone doing this on 8.04 LTS
[06:06] <osmosis> lucent: not that ive seen. that would be cool though. I only saw LVM and LVM encrypted now.
[06:06] <lucent> oh :/
[06:06] <lucent> I wonder why md RAID1 was glossed over?
[06:07] <erimar77> what's the install size?
[06:07] <erimar77> of base install
[06:07] <lucent> less than 2G for sure
[06:07] <lucent> erimar77: what do you want to know exactly
[06:08] <lucent> how big to make a partition?
[06:08] <erimar77> i take the ubuntu server disc, install.. do a df -h, what's the Used
[06:08] <lucent> ohh
[06:08] <lucent> I could do an install right now and find out for you
[06:08] <lucent> I'm wondering why you need that info
[06:08] <erimar77> i have an eeepc from asus and was going to use it as the base
[06:09] <erimar77> all i really need are some of the hardware specific drivers, xserver-xorg, fluxbox, and firefox
[06:10] <lucent> ah, okay
[06:10] <lucent> is that x86?
[06:10] <erimar77> yes
[06:10] <lucent> wow, sure I'll run a no-frills install and have a look
[06:10] <lucent> I think, give me 20-40 minutes?
[06:10] <erimar77> i have a virtual environment i can do it, was just hoping someone knew off the top
[06:11] <erimar77> thanks for the offer though
[06:18] <lucent> erimar77: north of 540MB, south of 600MB
[06:18] <lucent> I did an encrypted install of ubuntu server Hardy 8.04 LTS
[06:18] <lucent> no tasks selected
[06:19] <lucent> it's really irritating that swap is not encrypted
[06:19] <erimar77> encrypted install, eh
[06:26] <rhineheart_m> how's hardy in server administration?
[06:26] <rhineheart_m> Is it doing better than gutsy?
[06:27] <lucent> rhineheart_m: IMO gutsy wasn't ready for server deployment anyway
[06:28] <rhineheart_m> lucent, you mean.. gutsy server ed is not that secured than hardy in the same purpose?
[06:28] <lucent> compared to the previous LTS release (Dapper?)
[06:30] <lucent> Hardy tackles a few key things to make it scale better, like integration with libvirt for virtualisation and better awareness in the marketplace
[06:30] <lucent> it's tough to convince vendors to open their engineering man-hours to you if nobody has heard of you
[06:31] <lucent> :)
[06:31] <osmosis> libvirt woot woot!
[06:31] <lucent> it's pretty user-friendly actually
[06:32] <lucent> I mean, libvirt related things and virt-manager
[06:32] <rhineheart_m> hardy is user-friendly you mean?
[06:32] <osmosis> i just formated my server and setup kvm libvirt today.  configing my guest slices now.
[06:32] <erimar77> lucent: thanks
[06:32] <osmosis> i switched off xen. i am much happier with kvm.
[06:32] <lucent> yeah I am about to nuke my xen gutsy install
[06:32] <lucent> it was a fucked up nightmare to deal with
[06:32] <osmosis> lucent: i couldnt even get xen to work on gutsy. i had to run xen on feisty.
[06:33] <rhineheart_m> so, are people here recommend hardy for server than gutsy?
[06:33] <lucent> osmosis: you are the smart one. I stuck with it and sank 6 hours hacking that thing to work
[06:33] <osmosis> yah, cant stand xens custom kernels.  kvm is a simple kernel module..couldnt be easier for that part. im still getting used to virsh though.
[06:33] <osmosis> the only thing that bummed me out was amd64 didnt seem to work to well, so I stuck with 32 bit.
[06:34] <erimar77> kvm is pretty slick, noticed you can boot a separate partition as a vm
[06:34] <rhineheart_m> ows..nobody is listening to me :(
[06:34] <lucent> I liked the hypervisor because I have some gratis 1U servers that were dropped in my lap, they do not have VT but they do have HT and dual SMP Xeon 3.0GHz procs
[06:34] <erimar77> rhineheart_m: i'm new, dont mind me
[06:35]  * rhineheart_m considered erimar77
[06:35] <lucent> rhineheart_m: I won't go near Gutsy again. It is buggy on desktop and server, all effort being put forth is going into Hardy
[06:36] <osmosis> im finding a lot of major bugs in hardy for php5 modules. pretty messed.
[06:36]  * rhineheart_m still waiting for confirmation from other members here...since he is still contemplating to what version of ubuntu he is going to use after he formats his box...
[06:36] <lucent> osmosis: the turn-around on reported bugs has been pretty good, for the areas I'm interested in (virtualisation, usability)
[06:37]  * rhineheart_m has been running gutsy since january but decides to upgrade to hardy to for LTS. Hope to hear some good views here..
[06:37] <lucent> osmosis: of note, I found a lot of bugs "complained and diagnosed" on the forums that were not filed in launchpad
[06:37] <lucent> which is a damn shame
[06:38] <lucent> inappropriate use of /me btw, fwiw
[06:39] <erimar77> maybe they only speak in 3rd person
[06:39] <lucent> hm, I must consider that too, heh
[06:39] <erimar77> could be a rockstar or actor
[06:39]  * osmosis likes to speak about himself in 3rd person.
[06:39] <lucent> I'm thinking rockstar
[06:39] <lucent> an actor would use iChat
[06:39]  * lucent coughs "Bruce Willis is in da housssse"
[06:40]  * rhineheart_m has secretary in the desk to speak for himself
[06:41] <lucent> Is this anything like a Genie in a bottle?
[06:41] <lucent> agh enough being trolled
[06:42] <lucent> RAID1 install from Hardy... possible? or ... unpossible.
[06:43] <rhineheart_m> what version of apache is being used in hardy?
[06:45] <erimar77> 2.2.8
[06:45] <erimar77> -1
[06:45] <lucent> packages.ubuntu.com I think
[06:46] <rhineheart_m> Thanks erimar77. THat helps
[06:47] <lucent> rhineheart_m: http://packages.ubuntu.com/hardy/net/
[06:50] <rhineheart_m> thanks too lucent.
[06:51] <rhineheart_m> webmin should be studied again by cannonical.. I guess it has been maintained by the developers already as it was the reason why it was being removed from the repo
[06:52] <lucent> I don't know the answer, but that is not okay to make an assumption like this
[06:54] <lucent> big packages that are once in the repository, and then moved or removed from the repository, would be discussed on a developer mailing list (sorry, I don't know which mailing list applies, I am always finding these things out by searching mailing list archives and webmin does not interest me)
[06:55] <rhineheart_m> but I've been using webmin since 1.40 and that was on january...and I upgraded it to 1.410 which was released earlier. I was able to use ISPCOnfig in debain machine..and ebox in gutsy... but ebox can't really compete webmin in terms of functionality.. and I would prefer webmin over ISPConfig (that's just an honest feedback actually)
[06:56] <lucent> launchpad.net and mailing lists are good resources to "put your vote in"
[06:58] <rhineheart_m> I don't have more than time to do it.. :) Hope developers are here too...
[07:01] <lucent> punter.
[07:01] <lucent> I tried.
[07:22] <kgoetz> morning all :)
[07:23]  * kgoetz installs 8.04 server on a system and goes o_0 at teh 'ssh-server' task
[07:32]  * kgoetz wonders if hte installer is meant to be this silent or if its a bug
[07:35] <lucent> kgoetz: the ubuntu repositories are swamped
[07:36] <lucent> so... I know at least for contacting the repositiories it is sitting there waiting for a response from the repositories
[07:36] <lucent> kgoetz: which part is quiet for you?
[07:37] <kgoetz> lucent: i know. i'd still like hte message to change from 'finished installing apparmour' to 'wasting your time trying to update from a mirror you dont want to use'
[07:37] <kgoetz> ^^
[07:37] <lucent> heh
[07:37] <kgoetz> hm. 7 minutes to downlaod 1178kb
[07:37] <lucent> it sounds funny, but it is the truth!  what if you were supposed to manage 1,000 copies of Ubuntu to install?
[07:38] <kgoetz> so i'm getting ~3kb/s
[07:38] <lucent> in my experience the past two days, the initial connection takes a while to get a response
[07:38] <kgoetz> you'd probably dns it so the mirrors are local. my problem is i'm installing the gateway, which will be the dns/cache while i updat ethe serverrs/clients ;)
[07:38] <lucent> the actual transfer is much faster
[07:39]  * kgoetz wonders if unplugging it and haxking hte sources.list after install will be better
[07:50] <kgoetz> this is driving me crazy ;|
[07:56] <kgoetz> \o/ movement
[09:08] <NineTeen67Comet> Wh'elp .. I've got an annoying issue with update-module-core. It seems to have an issue with pycentral (re-installed python-central and all dependancies for update-module-core) .. I an error when I run anything, even dpkg --reconfigure -a .. here's the error ..
[09:09] <NineTeen67Comet>  /var/lib/dpkg/info/python-apt.postinst: 6: pycentral: not found
[09:09] <NineTeen67Comet> But I've re-installed python-central several times .. with the same error
[09:13]  * NineTeen67Comet sigh, now python-apt is crying ...
[09:22] <sergevn> Hello, installed apache and logwatch on an new server. everyday im getting log's that bots try to hammer random files on my server, is there some prevention against this?
[09:24] <kgoetz> against what exactly?
[11:58] <kgoetz>  installing over file:/// ftw! bugger mirrors for a joke ;|
[12:16] <HS-L> hello, I've got a VPS that's running 6.06LTS server what's the best way to upgrade it to 8.04?
[12:17] <HS-L> i want to test it on the VPS before i start thinking about upgrading my production server :)
[12:17] <kgoetz> help.ubuntu.com has the upgrade page. iirc /community/HardyUpgrades
[12:18] <HS-L> this is what i found:
[12:18] <HS-L> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes
[12:19] <kgoetz> url looks correct
[12:19] <HS-L> but it doesn't tell me how to upgrade from 6.06 to 8.04 directly.
[12:19] <kgoetz> should do
[12:19] <HS-L> it only tells me how to upgrade From 6.06 to 6.10
[12:20] <kgoetz> hm
[12:20]  * kgoetz is trying to make his browser work so he can look
[12:20] <Deeps> HS-L: look for the hardy upgrade page, it explains how to do the LTS to LTS upgrade
[12:21] <HS-L> Deeps: correct, but only for desktop's
[12:21] <HS-L> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading
[12:21] <HS-L> and i don't have a GUI :)
[12:22] <kgoetz> has anyone had problems with hardy absolutely *sucking* when it comes to network IO? i have a system that is struggling to use its network stack
[12:22] <kgoetz> and its almost a clean install
[12:23] <Deeps> HS-L: first hit on google for "ubuntu server LTS upgrade", and also happens to be the path kgoetz already gave you
[12:23] <kgoetz> 'almost' meaning about 5 hours old.
[12:24] <Deeps> HS-L: only point worth noting is that you dont want to use the -d flag, as you're not upgrading to a release currently in development
[12:24] <Deeps> HS-L: but rather, a stable release
[12:26] <Deeps> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/upgrading also has server upgrade information
[12:26] <Deeps> and you might need the -d flag after all from 6.06
[12:27] <HS-L> ah now i see it, i thought that was for kubuntu..
[12:27] <Deeps> "Network upgrade for Ubuntu servers (recommended)"
[12:27] <HS-L> yeah, thx.
[12:28] <HS-L> now i have to find out what the update repo's are, my sources.list is quite empty :)
[12:28] <HS-L> deb http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ dapper-updates main restricted
[12:28] <HS-L> just that?
[12:28] <kgoetz> if you use update-manager it will handle package sources
[12:29] <HS-L> but that's a GUI app isn't it?
[12:30] <Deeps> HS-L: yep, that should do the job
[12:30] <Deeps> and apt-get update
[12:30] <HS-L> well, no I have to hope my VPS will be up again soon..
[12:30] <HS-L> :)
[12:30] <HS-L> ah there it is, alive again.
[12:31] <kgoetz> there are non-gui instructiosn on that page
[12:31] <Deeps> Of course, your plan to test on a VM before testing on your real machine is a good one
[12:31] <HS-L> kgoetz: yeah, thats where my question was about.
[12:31] <HS-L> Deeps: :)
[12:32] <HS-L> don't want to risc a trip to the datacenter just yet :)
[12:32]  * kgoetz is fairly bamboozled at how badly this network stack is performing
[12:34] <kgoetz> i cant run a gateway on a system which cant even connect to the net ffs.
[12:51] <HS-L> this is my sources.list http://pastie.textmate.org/187551
[12:51] <HS-L> but there's still something missing
[12:52] <HS-L> http://pastie.textmate.org/187553
[12:52] <HS-L> that's the error I get
[12:55] <Deeps> !show lsb-release
[12:55]  * Deeps nudges ubotu
[12:56] <kgoetz> perhaps !info ?
[12:56] <Deeps> hehe
[12:56] <Deeps> !info lsb-release
[12:56] <ubotu> lsb-release (source: lsb): Linux Standard Base version reporting utility. In component main, is important. Version 3.2-4ubuntu1 (hardy), package size 19 kB, installed size 84 kB
[12:56] <Deeps> lol
[12:56] <Deeps> in a pm: 12:55:27 <ubotu> Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :)
[12:56] <kgoetz> hehe
[12:59] <Deeps> ubotu: help
[12:59] <ubotu> I am ubotu, all-knowing infobot. You can browse my brain at http://ubotu.ubuntu-nl.org/factoids.cgi - Usage info: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBots
[13:02] <HS-L> mhm,.. strange can't find anything about this error
[13:02] <Deeps> Have you tried installing the packages it's failing on manually?
[13:02] <DJMirage> mogge
[13:02] <HS-L> jups, also fails
[13:03] <Deeps> as in, download the deb from packages.ubuntu.com, dpkg -i
[13:03] <HS-L> mhmm,.. I always hate doing that manually :)
[13:03] <HS-L> but it's probably the only option
[13:04] <HS-L> mhmm,...
[13:04] <HS-L> lsb-release is only in hardy,.. do i need to add the hardy repo's?
[13:04] <Deeps> no, it's in dapper too
[13:05] <HS-L> you sure? why can't apt-get find the packages? :?
[13:05] <Deeps> you should have it installed already though
[13:05] <Deeps> http://packages.ubuntu.com/dapper/lsb-release
[13:06] <Deeps> apt-get find?
[13:07] <kgoetz> dpkg -l or dpkg --get-selections |grep lsb-release
[13:07] <kgoetz> and unless you've striped your ubuntu it should be there
[13:12] <HS-L> # dpkg --get-selections |grep lsb-release
[13:12] <HS-L> lsb-release                                     deinstall
[13:12] <HS-L> so it's there..
[13:29] <kgoetz> i'd try and help, but i seem to be having http issues
[13:30] <HS-L> kgoetz: i'm not in a hurry :)
[15:38] <spiroo> Does somebody in here, have experience with apache2 configuration for mod_rewrite and .htaccess files?
[15:40] <spiroo> anyone?
[15:41] <Deeps> tried #apache?
[15:44] <spiroo> yes. they do not know how to.
[15:44] <Deeps> lol
[15:45] <spiroo> It seems like nobody has my problem :D
[16:01] <SelfDeletion> hey folks, quick newby IPTABLES question, ive added my rules to my INPUT chain, how do i save them so that they are there after reboot? i tried iptables-save but it don't seem to work
[16:02] <Deeps> iptables-save will output to stdout, you wanna save them into a file, e.g., iptables-save > /etc/network/firewall
[16:02] <Deeps> then you'll want an init script to run iptables-restore < /etc/network/firewall during startup
[16:02] <SelfDeletion> ah ok, so tahts where im going wrong :D
[16:03] <SelfDeletion> im asuming that writing the iptable rule chains myself is as good as using something like shorewall ?
[16:04] <Deeps> i dont know what shorewall is, but if you know what you're doing, then yes, its as good (if not better) than any other tool can do for you
[16:04] <SelfDeletion> ok cool thanks :)
[16:04] <SelfDeletion> and i think shorewall is an alternative to Firestarter but has a cli into it as well as a gui
[16:09] <SelfDeletion> Deeps, just been looking at a tutorial on IPTables, is it safe enough to put the restore entry in the /etc/network/interfaces file? e.g. "pre-up iptables-restore < /etc/iptables.rules" for an interface?
[16:10] <Deeps> sure
[16:10] <SelfDeletion> ok cool thanks :)
[16:10] <Deeps> only problem is if that interface doesn't come up, and instead you start using a different one, then the firewall rules never come up
[16:11] <SelfDeletion> should be ok on this server as its only got the one nic in it (just a home test pc) but i'll bear that in mind for multiple interface systems
[16:53] <kgoetz> sigh. 1.30 am and i'm starting a gateway install
[17:04] <SelfDeletion> Deeps, just a note, seems that if you put that line in the /etc/network/interfaces after the address, netmask etc for a static interface it fails to bring up the interface, if you put it after the interface def but before the address, netmask etc it works fine (i.e. iface eth0 inet static \n pre-up ... \n address... etc)
[17:15] <Deeps> urr
[17:15] <osmosis> for munin, what does this do?  use_node_name yes
[17:31] <Scunizi> What version of FTP server is installed on Hardy if tagged?
[17:50] <osmosis> what is  /dev/mapper/loop0p1  ?  is that a ramdisk?
[18:14] <Lucutious> Good Evening!  Ubuntu newbie here, just curious - What's the process for installing new hardware in Ubuntu?  Like in Windows, you install card, install drivers, you're GTG.  Is it the same in Ubuntu, does it automatically find it, or will I have to find drivers?
[18:25] <Scunizi> lftp is what is installed with server when the option is checked.  How is that configured?  Docs are rather sparse for a noob on server like me.  Using gftp it tries to connect from inside my lan but wants a uname and pass. :(
[18:33] <Sid> hello I am having difficulties installing Apache2
[18:33] <Sid> i try apt-get install Apache2 and I get a tonne of errors
[18:33] <Sid> E: Problem parsing dependency Depends
[18:33] <Sid> E: Error occurred while processing slapd (NewVersion1)
[18:33] <Sid> E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_gutsy-security_main_binary-i386_Packages
[18:33] <Sid> E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
[18:34] <Scunizi> Sid.. not sure but try sudo apt-get update then sudo apt-get upgrade then sudo apt-get install Apache2
[18:34] <Sid> im logged in as root does that matter?
[18:35] <Scunizi> then you shouldn't need sudo
[18:35] <blue-frog> and you shouldn't need to ask either
[18:37] <Sid> it seems to have gotten stuck
[18:38] <Sid> 99% Connecting to ca.archives.ubuntu.com [some ip]
[18:44] <Sid> Fetched 192B in 5m51s (1B/s)
[18:44] <Sid> Failed to fetch http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy/Release.gpg Could not connect to ca.archive.ubuntu.com:80 (<IP_ADDRESS>), connection timed out
[18:44] <Sid> Failed to fetch http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/gutsy/main/i18n/Translation-en_CA.bz2 Could not connect to ca.archive.ubuntu.com:80 (<IP_ADDRESS>), connection timed out
[18:44] <Sid> Reading package lists... Error!
[18:44] <Sid> E: Problem parsing dependency Depends
[18:44] <Sid> E: Error occurred while processing slapd (NewVersion1)
[18:44] <Sid> E: Problem with MergeList /var/lib/apt/lists/security.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_gutsy-security_main_binary-i386_Packages
[18:44] <Sid> E: The package lists or status file could not be parsed or opened.
[19:46] <osmosis> Is awstats the the best apache log file analysis tool?
[19:50] <spiroo> osmosis: Subjective task, but one of the best probably.
[19:52] <spiroo> Does somebody in here have good knowledge with apache 2. I need help with one thing, which they could not help me with in apache channel.
[19:53] <osmosis> spiroo: ask away
[19:53] <spiroo> Well, here it goes. I have problem with access root folder with my .htacess file.
[19:54] <spiroo> http://pastebin.org/32379
[19:54] <osmosis> spiroo: please explain more clearly
[19:54] <spiroo> I do not have any index file and have turned off Indexes.
[19:55] <osmosis> and the problem is ?
[19:55] <spiroo> When I am going to /var/www (http://localhost) I got 403, permission denied. Because it cannot find any index file, and indexing is not possible. I want the request to go forward to my .htaccess file
[19:56] <osmosis> spiroo: sorry, im not following you.
[19:56] <spiroo> I mean forbidden
[19:56] <osmosis> i dont get it
[19:56] <spiroo> osmosis: Well not many does :D I am trying to access an folderm which does not have any index file such index.htm.
[19:56] <spiroo> My .htaccess file is inside that root folder.
[19:56] <osmosis> what exactly are you trying to do ?
[19:57] <spiroo> When I am going to my startpage I want it to let the request go forward even if I have Indexes turned off and no index file is found.
[19:57] <spiroo> My .htacess file points the request towards my own coded framework which handle the uri /.
[19:59] <spiroo> I know it is possible to fix. I have done it before, but I do not remember how to do.
[20:05] <spiroo> osmosis ?
[20:05] <osmosis> spiroo: sounds like you want to do a Redirect?
[20:06] <osmosis> spiroo: well. as long as your .htaccess file is working, and your mod_redirect is working, it should work. You need to check those.
[20:06] <spiroo> No I do not wanna do a redirect
[20:06] <spiroo> Look on this: http://pastebin.org/32399
[20:06] <spiroo> Which is my htaccess file.
[20:07] <spiroo> Everything is working. The problem is the apache server.
[20:08] <osmosis> spiroo: i dont know what you are trying to do
[20:09] <spiroo> osmosis: I am trying to make this work. I do not have any index file in root path, Indexes is turned off. If I do a request for root directory it should read my .htaccess file and not looking for a index file which does not exist. If it does not exists the request should go on, but it does not.
[20:10] <osmosis> spiroo: trying to make 'what' work ?
[20:10] <spiroo> If I am typing this: http://localhost/ I only get 403, denied
[20:11] <spiroo> osmosis: I am trying to make my framework working wih apacheserver?
[20:11] <osmosis> if it was to be working...what would that behavior be.
[20:11] <spiroo> osmosis: It should be possible to send a request for a directory which does not exists and no index file inside it.
[20:11] <osmosis> spiroo: so your .htaccess file isnt doing the rewrite like its suppose to ?
[20:11] <spiroo> If I go to http://localhost/ it should view my startpage for my website.
[20:12] <osmosis> spiroo: where is your startpage located ?
[20:12] <spiroo> http://localhost/ would send a request to my http://localhost/www/default.php file which handles it like a index page and gets the right template.
[20:12] <spiroo> osmosis: From different parts. I do not have time to explain my framework.
[20:13] <osmosis> spiroo: i dont have much time either. got to go. best of luck!
[20:13] <spiroo> Just say it works like this: http://localhost/:module/:pagecontroller/:command/:params
[20:18] <apache-n00b> Awesome, is there anybody in here?
[20:22] <apache-n00b> Need help
[20:52] <apache-n00b> anyone in here?
[20:55] <giovani> apache-n00b: I think it's clear there are many people here, not all are active, but, asking if people are here won't get much of a response typically
[20:55] <apache-n00b> giovani: Hehe, you are right. But I do not want to take the journey again. Could someone read what I have written before. I am the spiroo guy :D
[20:57] <apache-n00b> giovani: ?
[20:58] <giovani> apache-n00b: what?
[20:58] <giovani> I wasn't here when you asked the question
[20:59] <apache-n00b> giovani: Okay, well, how experienced are you with apache2?
[20:59] <Scunizi> neither was I and I logged in at 2.5 hours ago
[20:59] <Scunizi> apache-n00b: you really need to just ask your question again.
[20:59] <apache-n00b> okay I type it all again if I think it is neccessary.
[20:59] <apache-n00b> Yes, well okay. Just a sec
[21:00] <giovani> apache-n00b: well ... unless this question is specific to ubuntu-server ... I think #apache would be FAR more relevant
[21:00] <apache-n00b> Here it goes again: I want to access localhost/ which mean root folder. In root folder I have no index file and Indexes is turned off. Is everybody with me so far?
[21:01] <apache-n00b> giovani: Well, they banned me because they could not answer my question. I got on their nerves :D
[21:01] <Scunizi> you're doing this from terminal?
[21:01] <apache-n00b> Scunizi: No? Webbrowser? Or what do you mean?
[21:01] <giovani> ... if you were banned from #apache over this ... I suggest you re-evaluate your irc etiquette
[21:02] <Scunizi> so you want to access your root from a browser?
[21:02] <apache-n00b> I did not do anything, I just typed and asked a lot of questions. Did not get mean, spamming, overfloading or anything.
[21:02] <giovani> apache-n00b: your etiquette here has already left much to be desired
[21:02] <giovani> so, just ask the question
[21:03] <apache-n00b> Scunizi: Yes and No. I want if I go to root folder. It should pass the request forward to my .htaccess file which is inside root folder even if it cannot find an index file.
[21:03] <giovani> you want to point apache at your root dir ... stupid, but, go ahead ... what's the actual problem?
[21:03] <apache-n00b> giovani: "your etiquette here has already left much to be desired". What do you mean exactly, my english is not too good unfortunatly
[21:04] <Scunizi> and you're trying this from the same machine or are you doing this remotely?
[21:04] <apache-n00b> No I do not want it to point to my root folder.
[21:04] <apache-n00b> From same machine.
[21:04] <apache-n00b> I have access to all config files.
[21:04] <giovani> you do ... you've said "I want to access localhost/ which mean root folder."
[21:05] <Scunizi> maybe you mean you want to see /var/www which would be root for your web server?
[21:05] <apache-n00b> I want to point every single request to /var/www/www/default.php which it does for the moment. The problem is when the request uri is /. It cannot handle root folder for the moment.
[21:06] <apache-n00b> giovani: Yes, sorry. I am not to good with english sentence building :D
[21:06] <giovani> apache-n00b: well, unfortunately, you haven't really asked a question, and you've been talking for minutes ... this is probably why the folks in #apache threw you out
[21:06] <Scunizi> so try http://localhost:<port for server>
[21:06] <apache-n00b> Scunizi: No, I do not wanna view my root folder.
[21:07] <apache-n00b> giovani: I am tryng to explain first what I want to do. Nobody understand exactly what I am tryng to do because my framework is complex.
[21:07] <giovani> apache-n00b: you're being extremely unclear
[21:08] <apache-n00b> giovani: I understand that you getting tired of my talk. But I am tryng the best I can here to make it clear what I really want to do.
[21:09] <Scunizi> are you trying to setup multiple sites?  if /var/www/www/default.php is what your using, typically it should be /var/www/default.php.. and do you just want it to display a list of files since you don't have an index?
[21:10] <apache-n00b> Well lets say this: When I type http://localhost into my browser. The first thing it is doing, is that it search for an index file. Well I do not have nay index file. Then it is trying to make an index, of Indexing is turned on. Which it is not.
[21:10] <Scunizi> and?
[21:10] <apache-n00b> After that it is throwing an 403 error on me. BUT I want to pass the request forward anyway.
[21:11] <Scunizi> forward where?
[21:11] <apache-n00b> It should process to my .htaccess file which point the request forward to my framework.
[21:11] <apache-n00b> Then my framework handles the uri.
[21:12] <apache-n00b> Here is what happens from request: http://pastebin.org/32379
[21:12] <apache-n00b> And here is my htaccess file: http://pastebin.org/32399
[21:12] <Scunizi> sounds like you're just trying to do a "re-direct" from one location to another.  Does that sound right to you giovani ?
[21:12] <giovani> I honestly have stopped listening, he's wasting everyone's time with his explanations
[21:12] <apache-n00b> This only fails when I am tryng to access my startpage. If I am typing for instance http://localhost/about the request is passing forward.
[21:14] <apache-n00b> So the question is: How do I fix my apache server to handles request to my root folder, which not has any index file?
[21:15] <apache-n00b> Scunizi: It sounds very unlogical if you does not understand my framework. I could explain, but I do not think you wanna listen on that too.
[21:16] <apache-n00b> giovani, Scunzi: This was the reason they kicked me out. I was wasting their time. I do not think this is fair, because I have not break any rules. Maybe you could learn something from this too.
[21:16] <Scunizi> I think I understand what you want to do but I don't know how to do it.
[21:18] <apache-n00b> Scunizi: okay, good :) Well that is the problem, nobody know how to do. I have solved this before without any bad hacks. But it was so long time ago that I cannot remember. It has something to do with Indexes and AllowOverride I think.
[21:19] <apache-n00b> I turned off Indexes and AllowOverride is set to All. I need to make it possible to change everything in my .htaccess file. I know it is risky. But I am the only user for this server. I do not wanna put the server online.
[21:21] <apache-n00b> I think it has something to do with this in vhost config file: http://pastebin.org/32412
[21:27] <apache-n00b> Thanks for your help anyway.
[21:34] <apache-n00b> Would this rule match http://localhost/ : "RewriteRule ^.+(/.*)?$  /www/default.php [L]" ?
[21:40]  * rgl waves
[22:49] <cellofellow> I've got a lightly used but important home server running DNSmasq, Apache, MySQL, PostgreSQL, BackupPC, and a few other things. It's running Gutsy, is a dist-upgrade to Hardy a wise move?
[22:50] <timboy2> hey i removed apache and deleted /etc/apache2 and reinstalled apache but /etc/apache2 didn't get recreated...
[22:50] <spiroo> YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS whos tha man. Now it works, untz untz untz
[22:51] <cellofellow> timboy2: sudo aptitude purge apache2, then install again. dpkg still thinks that /etc/apache2 is there.
[22:51] <timboy2> cellofellow, ok thx!
[22:51] <spiroo> Not sure why DirectoryIndex /www/default.php works though xD
[22:52] <timboy2> spiroo, what did you do hack the planet?
[22:52] <spiroo> timboy2: Yes ;)
[22:52] <spiroo> It took me all day to work out that "bad hack"
[22:52] <timboy2> sweet! I have a neighbor that I want replaced with a sink-hole... ;)
[22:52] <spiroo> no problemo.
[22:53] <timboy2> cellofellow, apache2: Could not open configuration file /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: No such file or directory
[22:54] <spiroo> Is it possible to get unbanned from apache, or is it too late? :D
[22:54] <timboy2> spiroo, why do you want back in apache? all they ever tell anyone is to read the manual. :P
[22:55] <spiroo> I want to show them how I solved the problem they could not help me with.
[22:55] <cellofellow> timboy2: not sure exactly which package to purge, but purging removes the conf files.
[22:55] <cellofellow> timboy2: dpkg -S /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
[22:55] <spiroo> timboy2: I get kicked because I was taking to much time and place in the channel. I did not break any rules.
[22:57] <spiroo> timboy2: But the "solution" is really bad, but it does tha job. I just need it to work temperary to get my website done.
[22:59] <timboy2> cellofellow, was apache2.2-common and thank you!
[23:01] <spiroo> In the future I am going to develop apache to be working even if it does not find an index file or Indexing is turned on. Every single request should be possible to control for the user.
[23:15] <Jay> gi guys
[23:15] <Jay> hi* guys


[00:48] <canthus13> dzho: Probably, but $REALLY_OLD_BUT_FAMOUS_COMPUTER is infinitely more productive.
[00:49] <canthus13> and cable boxes are touchy enough without throwing something at them they don't expect. you'd prolly just brick it.
[00:49] <canthus13> hell. Watching TV can brick a cable box.
[00:50] <dzho> it's not the cable box, it's just a DVR-sans-hard-drive
[00:50] <dzho> ostensibly a blue-ray player, but it has an ethernet jack and a USB port
[00:50] <dzho> blu-ray (tm)
[00:50] <canthus13> ah.
[00:51] <dzho> was something like $40 or $50 on sale at Best Buy over the holidays and so I was sort of "meh, why not"
[00:51]  * canthus13 has seen a Pace box brick simply by turning it off and back on.
[00:51] <dzho> yeah, that sounds like A Problem
[00:51] <canthus13> It's not really Pace's fault.. It's TV Guide. their sofware sucks.
[00:52] <Cheri703> \o/ I like xubuntu!
[00:53] <Cheri703> super customizable panels = happy dual monitors!
[00:53] <Cheri703> also 24" 16:10 monitors are HUGE
[00:54] <canthus13> I have a 22" at work. it's quite large enough.
[00:55] <Cheri703> :D I got two
[00:55] <Cheri703> semi-impulsively, but...yes. migraine brought on by flickery screen = OMG MAKE IT STOP
[00:56] <Cheri703> I'd been eyeing these for a while, just hadn't pulled the trigger
[00:56]  * canthus13 nods.
[05:10] <skellat> Blah: http://erielookingproductions.info/2013/01/119-seeking-the-logline
[14:09] <dzho> Cheri703: you have two 24" monitors?
[15:36] <Cheri703> yep :D
[15:36] <Cheri703> as of yesterday evening
[15:37] <Cheri703> I'll fully admit it's a bit of overkill for day to day personal computer use, BUT for work stuff it's pretty great
[15:44] <paultag> overkill?
[15:44] <paultag> is there such a thing?
[15:56] <Cheri703> pretty sure the setup of one of the contractors for my company would qualify, he's got like 6 monitors of varying sizes up to (iirc) 30" all arrayed in front of him
[16:39] <jrgifford> Cheri703: that's not overkill
[16:39] <jrgifford> i met a guy who had like 10 20" monitors
[16:40] <jrgifford> one was a nagios dashboard
[16:40] <paultag> the most I had was 3 :)
[16:40] <jrgifford> he had his server error.log piped through some funky grep thing that returned serious stuff on one
[16:40] <paultag> Once I get my new place, I'm about to try 2x2, or 1x4, longways
[16:40] <Cheri703> I'm at 3 if I'm also running the laptop on my lapdesk
[16:41] <jrgifford> and had ssh terminals to other machines on all the others.
[16:41] <jrgifford> the guy never saw his desktop.
[16:42] <paultag> ← never sees his desktop
[18:29] <skellat> This is part of why living in Ashtabula County can get aggravating at times: http://identi.ca/notice/99213560
[19:11] <paultag> http://fuckyeahohio.com/
[19:11] <paultag> btw, that exists
[19:16] <Cheri703> http://www.imfromohio.com/post/40961158020/trying-to-convince-someone-that-there-are-fun-things-to
[19:17]  * dzho sighs
[19:18] <paultag> ahhahahaha
[19:18] <paultag> hahahaha - http://www.imfromohio.com/post/41162663030/ohioans-when-touchdown-jesus-was-struck-by
[19:18] <paultag> so PERFECT
[19:22] <dzho> http://www.imfromohio.com/post/40815201738/omg <- paultag
[19:22] <paultag> :D
[19:22] <dzho> s/nyc/bos/ of course ;-)
[19:23] <dzho> http://www.imfromohio.com/post/40765885538/everyone-in-ohio-when-forbes-named-dayton-as-the haha, I missed this forbes thing
[19:23] <paultag> aaaahahaha
[19:26] <Cheri703> yeah, someone linked me to that site a few days ago, saw the link from fyo and saw the mansfield one :)
[19:26] <Cheri703> I know no one here is officially a xubuntu person, but anyone have thoughts on this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1921687 ?
[19:26] <Cheri703> at least, afaik no one is
[19:28] <dzho> also, xubuntu+second monitor+ . . . well, ohio
[19:28] <dzho> ;-)
[19:28] <Cheri703> hrm?
[19:29] <dzho> intersection of sets are smaller than the sets themselves, so . . . good luck with that.
[19:29] <Unit193> Well, I don't use dual monitors, so don't know.
[19:29] <Cheri703> ah, yeah
[19:30] <Cheri703> it treats far edges as edges, even though you can make it so windows are draggable through the far edge
[19:30] <Unit193> skellat uses last I knew, as do I.
[19:30] <dzho> I can't remember if we're running lubuntu or xubuntu on the thinkpad the kid uses at home.
[19:30] <Cheri703> so you'd think *something* could be done to make the "seams" treated as edges
[19:30] <dzho> I'll try to pay attention next time I'm on it.
[19:30] <dzho> laptops + external monitor is a "two monitor" situation I often don't think about as such.
[19:31] <Cheri703> yeah
[19:31] <dzho> mostly because I most commonly encounter that with a projector, which is horrible to use as side-by-side, so we usually punt and mirror.
[19:32] <yano> haha, that site is golden
[19:32] <Cheri703> heh
[19:49] <Cheri703> one: I posted to the forums about this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1921687
[19:49] <Cheri703> bah, wrong window
[19:49] <Cheri703> sorry
[21:53] <Unit193> Cheri703: I decided to try OMG!Ponies just for the heck of it, someone just pinged me and I literally said "Oohh!" and jerked back a bit. :D
[21:53] <Cheri703> hehe, that was my reaction too!
[21:53] <Cheri703> it makes sure you don't miss messages
[21:53] <Cheri703> :D
[21:53] <Cheri703> hehehe
[21:53] <Unit193> (Switched back, of course)
[21:54] <Cheri703> I'm leaving it!
[21:54] <Cheri703> I have everything dark so normal notifications disappear
[21:54] <Cheri703> and if my phone is on silent or in another room, I need the visual notification


[01:04] <Arodon> hey all. Any word on a new release date for Alpha1?
[01:05] <baron1984> When it's ready
[01:05] <baron1984> I learned that from Mozilla ;)
[01:05] <baron1984> do you want it broken, and now, or in a useful state, and in a few days?
[01:10] <Arodon> heh yeah. Useful would be great, I was just curious how things were progressing
[01:11] <baron1984> I need to update my blog with the factoid that Ubuntu on the Itanic is officially dead with 8.10
[01:11]  * baron1984 laughs maniacally
[01:13] <baron1984> seriously, how do they expect to have their Server edition succeed when they cut official support for SPARC, PowerPC, and Itanium?
[01:13] <baron1984> are they going after the hobbist webserver market with AMD64?
[02:01] <Amaranth> for crazy people using intrepid with nvidia: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=833633
[02:01] <Amaranth> crazy because you're using intrepid, of course ;)
[02:23] <Beats> How can i install a gdm theme from a tar.gz
[02:30] <baron1984> X Server 1.5 makes me want to tear my Nvidia card out and live with Intel video
[02:32] <baron1984> One Second X is cool as hell though
[02:33] <baron1984> you're not twiddling your thumbs waiting for X to rear it's ugly head
[03:04] <Amaranth> baron1984: that's only with the intel driver right now :P
[03:05] <Amaranth> baron1984: also, how do you have xserver 1.5?
[14:36] <pwang> just wondering here. since the Intrepid alpha 1 release was delayed, have they confirmed the release date for it yet?
[14:52] <tnnc> anyone have any idea when alpha 1 will be out?
[16:54] <lastent> hi, what happened with the alpha1?
[18:19] <_anna> hi there :)
[18:20] <_anna> I have this conflice for a few days now, baring me from upgrade of KDE:
[18:20] <_anna> kdelibs4c2a: Conflicts: kdebase-kio-plugins (<= 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-1) but 4:3.5.9-0ubuntu7.2 is to be installed
[18:21] <_anna> Can you confirm or not, that this is normal like this?
[18:31] <BUGabundo> ya
[18:32] <BUGabundo> I'm having trouble with linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-19-generic
[18:32] <BUGabundo> is tim here some where?
[18:32] <BUGabundo> Tigge: ping ?
[18:32] <BUGabundo> getting this /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24-19-generic.postinst: 7: lrm-manager: not found
[18:44] <_anna> kdelibs4c2a: Conflicts: kdebase-kio-plugins (<= 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-1) but 4:3.5.9-0ubuntu7.2 is to be installed
[18:44] <_anna> can you confirm if that's normal?
[18:44] <_anna> with current archive
[18:46] <_anna> hm, anybody read me, or somthing wrong with my question, please?
[18:48] <BUGabundo> doesn't seem
[18:48] <BUGabundo> I'm still waiting too
[19:02] <BUGabundo> going....
[19:08] <shaya> anyone know how to configure pulse audio correctly?
[19:08] <shaya> I can manually set the sink w/ padevchooser
[19:08] <shaya> but by default I just get static on my t42p
[19:08] <shaya> seems to be using the pcspkr
[19:09] <Pici> I think thats happening for everyone.... but I could be mistaken
[19:09] <shaya> so this is a known issue, just not me?
[19:09] <shaya> ok
[19:09] <shaya> I'm able to work around it
[19:10] <DanaG> hMM, did you just install a new kernel?
[19:10] <Pici> I've heard other people say things about audio issues
[19:11] <DanaG> Sound drivers are now in the linux-ubuntu-modules package...... which hasn't been pushed out yet.
[19:11] <shaya> I have sound
[19:11] <shaya> for example
[19:11] <shaya> if I have audacity use alsa, it works fine
[19:12] <shaya> if I have audacity use pulse audio, by default it gives me static
[19:12] <shaya> I set it to use a specific sink, it works fine
[19:14] <shaya> basically, it says there's hw:1 and front:0
[19:15] <shaya> hw:1 doesnt work
[19:15] <shaya> front:0 does
[19:15] <shaya> shrug
[19:18] <DanaG> Oh, that's an Audacity issue.
[19:18] <DanaG> Audacity doesn't play well with PulseAudio.
[19:19] <shaya> ok
[19:19] <shaya> but
[19:19] <shaya> same for sound applet?
[19:19] <shaya> if I go to sound preferences
[19:20] <shaya> set sound playback to pulse audio sound server
[19:20] <shaya> I get a staticy tone
[19:20] <shaya> set it to alsa, and it works great
[19:20] <shaya> as well as OSS
[20:57] <pwnguin> is there a trick to nvidia on .26-generic?
[21:00] <crdlb> pwnguin: 20:57 < Amaranth> for crazy people using intrepid with nvidia: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=833633
[21:00] <pwnguin> i saw that last night
[21:00] <pwnguin> now that i check it again, theres a new comment about having to comment out the line that broke
[21:00] <crdlb> doesn't work?
[21:01] <pwnguin> theres some /sbin/lrm-video call that no longer exists
[21:13] <LBo> Hi all
[21:13] <LBo> I started a intrepid netboot install and the first option screen is different the feist, hardy, et cetera. Are they going to change the netboot process too?
[21:13] <pwnguin> crdlb: tselliot says its broke in intrepid
[21:13] <LBo> Would be nice
[21:13] <LBo> VNC like stuff just like fedora, opensuse
[22:45] <ghindo> The 8.10 alpha still isn't out yet, right?
[23:02] <tretle> It says its pre alpha in the topic?
[23:18] <ghindo> tretle: True.  But does anybody know when it comes out?  I thought it was supposed to be out last week...
[23:23] <tretle> ur guess is as good as mine
[23:47] <Hirato> lrm-video and lrm-manager seems to have dissapeared. I'm unable to manually install my nvidia GLX drivers due to this
[23:48] <Hirato> is there anything I can do to remedy it?


[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cli-helpers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: litecli [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-absl [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.11.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: iredis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.9.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: org-d20 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.4-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-gitlab-experiment [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.4.9-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dyda [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.41.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-scrnaseq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.4.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spyder-unittest [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pytzdata [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2020.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spyder-line-profiler [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[05:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[05:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: blur-effect [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fcitx5-libthai [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [5.0.2-2] (no packageset)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dyda [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.41.1-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted litecli [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-absl [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.11.0-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-scrnaseq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.4.0+ds-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spyder-line-profiler [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cli-helpers [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.1.0-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted org-d20 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.4-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-gitlab-experiment [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.4.9-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted iredis [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.9.1-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spyder-unittest [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pytzdata [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2020.1+dfsg-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted blur-effect [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fcitx5-libthai [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [5.0.2-2]
[09:00] <tjaalton> any AA up for reviewing diretx-headers from the NEW queue? It's wanted by new mesa to add support for d3d12 gallium driver, as requested by MS
[09:00] <tjaalton> uh, make that directx-headers
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1]
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-43.49~20.04.1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (groovy-proposed) [15.2.8-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.8-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sbuild [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.81.2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: shellingham [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.3.2-1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flask-oidc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flask-oidc [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted shellingham [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3.2-1]
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sbuild [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.81.2ubuntu1]
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gcc-11-cross-ports (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1ubuntu1]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-11-cross-ports [source] (hirsute-proposed) [1ubuntu1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1036.38~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1038.41~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1037.40~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[12:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2] (no packageset)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu38 => 2.04-1ubuntu38] (core)
[12:14] <doko> tseliot, sforshee: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460 is currently blocking the linux migration.
[12:14] <doko> migrating nvidia-kernel-common-460/460.39-0ubuntu1/amd64 to testing makes linux-modules-nvidia-460-aws/5.8.0-1018.20+21.04.1/amd64 uninstallable
[12:14] <doko> migrating nvidia-kernel-common-460/460.39-0ubuntu1/amd64 to testing makes linux-modules-nvidia-460-azure/5.8.0-1017.19+21.04.1/amd64 uninstallable
[12:14] <doko> migrating nvidia-kernel-common-460/460.39-0ubuntu1/amd64 to testing makes linux-modules-nvidia-460-gcp/5.8.0-1016.17+21.04.1/amd64 uninstallable
[12:14] <doko> migrating nvidia-kernel-common-460/460.39-0ubuntu1/amd64 to testing makes linux-modules-nvidia-460-oracle/5.8.0-1015.16+21.04.1/amd64 uninstallable
[12:21] <apw> doko, strictly linux-{aws,azure,gcp,oracle} are blocking n-g-d-460 migration which is blocking linux
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1037.40~18.04.1]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1038.41~18.04.1]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1036.38~18.04.1]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2]
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-66.74~18.04.2]
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1040.42] (core, kernel)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1037.40] (core, kernel)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1010.11] (no packageset)
[12:31] <doko> apw, hmm, but there are no such packages in -proposed?
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1033.34] (no packageset)
[12:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1038.41] (core, kernel)
[12:38] <apw> doko, right ... there are none, and there needs to be respins of those too, to pick up the new -460 before it can migrate
[12:38] <doko> ouch
[12:39] <apw> doko, i'll take it up with the relevant people
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.04-1ubuntu38 => 2.04-1ubuntu38] (core)
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (hirsute-proposed/main) [2.15.1-1ubuntu1 => 2.15.1-1ubuntu1] (core)
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (focal-proposed/main) [1:78.5.0+build3-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:78.7.0+build2-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enigmail (focal-proposed/universe) [2:2.2.4-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 2:2.2.4-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (mozilla) (sync)
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tinyjsd (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2+git1-1 => 1.2+git1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jsunit (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.2-2 => 0.2.2-2ubuntu1] (mozilla) (sync)
[14:52] <rbasak> ^ I'm working on these with oSoMoN
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1040.42]
[15:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1010.11]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1038.41]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1037.40]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1033.34]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu38]
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu38]
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uncalled [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2+ds-1]
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[17:46] <dannf`> Hi - process question: we've split kdump-tools out of makedumpfile into its own source package in sid, but i'm not sure what we need to do to land that in Ubuntu. MIR requires the package be in universe, but we presumably don't want it to import until we've sync'd the makedumpfile side to drop the kdump-tools binaries...
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uncalled [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/none) [2.2+ds-1] (no packageset)
[18:57] <xnox> dannf:  just do what you need in debian; and once it syncs over a lot of handwave will put it in the right places.
[18:58] <xnox> ...
[18:58] <xnox> on an unrelated note our LISP stack seems to be in dire state and segfaulting left and right, on all arches.
[18:58] <dannf> xnox: it's all done in debian, but makedumpfile has a delta, so it'll need a manual sync to drop the binary package
[19:06] <xnox> dannf:  did $ syncpackage kdump-tools to get that one over. i think autosync doesn't take splits like that.
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: kdump-tools (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1:<IP_ADDRESS>]
[19:06] <xnox> dannf:  w.r.t. makedumpfile, can that be synpackage --force too? or does the bump of 384M still needed?
[19:06] <xnox> as in does makedumpfile need a merge, or forcesync is good enough?
[19:06] <dannf> xnox: it needs a merge, I can handle that
[19:08] <xnox> dannf:  upload merge; and then archive admin will have all the pieces to push buttons.
[19:08] <dannf> xnox: ack, thx!
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.2.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:16.2.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (groovy-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0-0ubuntu2 => 2:17.0.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack)
[20:22] <xnox> Laney:  is britney.conf in britney2-ubuntu repository the production config, or not?
[20:23] <xnox> if it is production config => it is missing s390x in ADT_ARCHES? if it's not production config, where is that?
[20:35] <xnox> Laney:  pondering what you think about https://code.launchpad.net/~xnox/britney/+git/britney2-ubuntu/+merge/397690
[20:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: kdump-tools (hirsute-proposed/primary) [1:<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu1]
[21:06] <vorlon> xnox: the production config for britney2-ubuntu is generated by britney1-ubuntu
[21:07] <vorlon> (make_b2_config)
[21:30] <vorlon> rbalint: do you know why the systemd autopkgtest has regressed on amd64 (only)?  Seems the test VM is going into emergency mode...?
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [i386] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmd [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-3] (i386-whitelist)