[06:36] <PaulW2U> pleia2: np, off-work, bored, wanted to do something useful, recent issues suggest you need some help, happy to assist :)
[09:23]  * PaulW2U thinks 50% summaries done, leave rest for others, else finish tomorrow, no bullet pointing this week :)


[00:48] <valorie> I know I said I would upgrade this machine to bionic right about now, but I'm going to wait for some testing first!
[02:15] <tsimonq2> Whoever posted on Google+ isn't accurate.
[02:16] <tsimonq2> https://plus.google.com/107577785796696065138/posts/JKLqVAKC53b
[02:16] <tsimonq2> This is the first beta, not the first RC.
[02:16] <tsimonq2> Please fix it.
[02:18] <mparillo> It is the first RC of Beta 1. Usually there are several spins before the Beta is final.
[02:20] <mparillo> Ahh. but I left of Beta 1 in the G+ post.
[02:29] <tsimonq2> mparillo: Right, but the word "RC" isn't accurate. :)
[02:31] <tsimonq2> Thanks mparillo!
[06:48] <acheronuk> made some changes to make it clear these are candidate images for the beta, and not necessarily the beta
 Kool
[06:51] <acheronuk> 'candidate' could be confused with a RC by some I guess, but could not think of a better word, and think its important to be very clear this is not the beta1 announcement, which will follow.
[06:52] <valorie> "first spin" was a good one
[06:53] <acheronuk> not sure many people would quite get what that means. we do, but....
[06:56] <acheronuk> anyway. sorry to step on toes :/
[06:57] <valorie> we have to supply accurate information
[06:57] <valorie> that's what we all want
[06:57] <valorie> I'm glad for all help and I know mparillo is too
[07:00] <acheronuk> I'll could be busy a lot of the rest of the day, so I'm sorta rushing to do a few things now ;)
[07:07] <valorie> me too
 we really need to be careful in our social communications to not say things like "beta 1 is available", as its NOT
[08:49] <valorie> did I say that?
[08:50] <acheronuk> "Happy to say that #Kubuntu #beta 1 for our next LTS, Bionic is now available for #testing!"
[08:50] <valorie> mmm
[08:51] <valorie> I can edit it.... I got rushed I guess
[08:51] <acheronuk> I know that means not the actual beta, but I think that is not clear to people outside this loop
[08:51] <valorie> yes
[08:53] <acheronuk> did you see the discussion on the -release about dropping milestones and just having monthly iso test days?
[08:53] <acheronuk> that has an appeal
[08:53] <acheronuk> not for 18.04
[08:53] <valorie> yes, I read up after I returned home
[08:54] <valorie> I'm unsure
[08:54] <acheronuk> valorie: https://kubuntu.org/news/plasma-5-12-3-bugfix-updates-available-for-17-10-backports-ppa/
[08:56] <acheronuk> I pushed those. 99% sure they are ok. I may not have too much time later today, but should an issue crop up, I will MAKE time to fix
[08:56] <valorie> I think I have it now but haven't rebooted yet
[08:56] <valorie> I know the freeze for the beta causes some problems
[08:57] <valorie> but still.....
[08:58] <acheronuk> but still what?
[08:59] <valorie> still it's an event
[08:59] <acheronuk> oh. right. yes. I get that
[08:59] <valorie> but I can change my mind and we can make "testing days" an event
[08:59] <acheronuk> yes
[09:00] <valorie> we'll work with the majority opinion
[09:14] <valorie> ok, fixed my original tweet
[09:14] <valorie> and retweeted from kubuntu making it clear that it was a clarification
[09:14] <valorie> thanks, acheronuk
[09:15] <valorie> next time I'll have this prepared ahead of time, hopefully
[09:17] <acheronuk> np. stuff happens and we are busy
[09:21] <valorie> ha, I saved it in a text file for next time
[09:30] <valorie> oh gosh, it's 1:30am
[09:30] <valorie> niters


[04:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-ring-doorbell [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qatzip [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-ring-doorbell [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.8.7-1]
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qatzip [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-0ubuntu2]
[08:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: simplemonitor [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.12.0-1] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: s390-tools (noble-proposed/main) [2.31.0-0ubuntu3 => 2.31.0-0ubuntu4] (core)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted simplemonitor [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.12.0-1]
[09:15] <wgrant> The bulk no-change uploads for the xz-utils-related rebuilds are now done.
[09:18] <ginggs> thanks wgrant!
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: webkit2gtk [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.44.0-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[09:48] <doko> these libfoo1 any -> libfoo-common all dependencies with (= ${source:Version}) are a disease
[09:56] <wgrant> Yeah, !amd64 is in a pretty sad state atm, but getting there.
[09:58] <wgrant> But we're close to having ffmpeg, gnuplot, wxwidgets3.2 built, which are the big remaining ones I've been seeing.
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qatengine [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[10:42] <doko> building amd64 is one thing, but also getting the other archs installable again for builds
[10:47] <wgrant> Yeah, amd64 is in a better state than everything else atm.
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: webkit2gtk [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2.44.0-2] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[11:09] <doko> Package: gnuplot
[11:09] <doko> Architecture: all
[11:09] <doko> Depends: gnuplot-qt | gnuplot-x11 | gnuplot-nox,
[11:09] <doko>  ... and all the depends are of cause Arch: any ... lovely ...
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qatengine [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-0ubuntu3]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webkit2gtk [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.44.0-2]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted webkit2gtk [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.44.0-2]
[11:21] <wgrant> Those ones aren't versioned, though, at least.
[11:22] <wgrant> I thought I got gnuplot built everywhere a few hours ago anyway
[11:22] <wgrant> Ah no still waiting on wxwidgets3.2 to finish
[11:22] <wgrant> At least octave should build now
[11:22] <wgrant> ... I guess you already retried that
[11:25] <wgrant> It feels like apt is being worse than normal at dealing with arch-indep skew, but I guess we are tickling it in the worst possible ways.
[12:26] <ahasenack> hi, the excuses report seems stalled since many hours ago: 2024.03.31 23:05:06 +0000
[12:26] <ahasenack> the last log (https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/noble/2024-03-31/23:59:18.log) shows a backtrace, http 503 error
[12:27] <ahasenack> and today has no useful log yet: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/noble/2024-04-01/
[12:48] <doko> sure, with 15000+ uploads over the weekend ...
[12:55] <ahasenack> doko: usually when it's running, we can see an opened log file that gets appended to
[13:22] <doko> Launchpad is currently down
[13:24] <webchat33> doko: Seems reachable from here as of now.
[13:24] <webchat33> I had issues about an hour ago, though, and then it was also listed at https://status.canonical.com
[13:26] <ahasenack> we may have the beginning of a log, from 30min ago: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/log/noble/2024-04-01/12:52:27.log
[13:27] <ahasenack> it's the first non-notest.log file in today's directory
[13:35] <athos> FWIW, I am still getting 503 errors when trying to fetch sources from LP
[14:40] <wgrant> LP should be healthier now.
[14:40] <wgrant> Badly timed hardware faults.
[14:41] <wgrant> cmake, ffmpeg, wxwidgets3.2 built. Next publisher run is going to be a party.
[15:10] <doko> will be a long party, don't get drunk ;p
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: speech-dispatcher-contrib [i386] (noble-proposed/multiverse) [0.12.0~rc2-3] (i386-whitelist)
[17:11] <bdmurray> ahasenack: looking at the britney log the traceback was when connecting to the autopkgtest rabbitmq server. I just restarted rabbitmq for other reasons but hopefully that will help.
[17:20] <athos> \o/
[17:22] <ahasenack> 	12:52:27.log	2024-04-01 16:56	11M  we haz activity
[17:22] <ahasenack> oh, and ac rash
[17:22] <ahasenack> oh, and a crash
[17:22] <ahasenack> I think that's the rabbit crash bdmurray mentioned
[17:23] <ahasenack> but no new log file since
[17:25] <bdmurray> The latest run started at 17:07 so I expect it'll be abit
[17:26] <tsimonq2> I'm seeing ISO build failures for Lubuntu. It looks like those failures are simply in dependency resolution for livecd-rootfs itself, which could easily be solved by a cowboy to the pristine chroot enabling the updates pocket. Am I reading this right?
[17:27] <tsimonq2> (I have no idea how long we expect this xz "transition" to take, which is why I ask. Installed systems have updates enabled already, sure, just doesn't seem like the tarball for noble used to build the livefs images in Launchpad has it.)
[17:29] <tsimonq2> (per https://launchpadlibrarian.net/722565094/buildlog_ubuntu_noble_amd64_lubuntu_BUILDING.txt.gz RUN: /usr/share/launchpad-buildd/bin/in-target unpack-chroot - looks like update-debian-chroot only shows release pocket.)
[17:33] <ahasenack> bdmurray: what are the "notest.log" files, some sort "I'm alive" messaging?
[17:34] <bdmurray> ahasenack: I guess
[17:36] <bdmurray> ahasenack: "d/t/ssh-gssapi: make the test a bit more rebust"?
[17:38] <bdmurray> Well the 17:07 run didn't produce anything useful...
[17:39] <ahasenack> and launchpad is going to timeout for me
[17:40] <ahasenack> yep, proxy error, just got it
[17:42] <ahasenack> bdmurray: that test, it wasn't failing when it should (set -e inside functions == nono)
[17:42] <bdmurray> ahasenack: my coment was about your busted spelling
[17:42] <ahasenack> oh, see
[17:42] <bdmurray> ;-)
[17:42] <ahasenack> I guess I made the spelling mistake twice then
[17:42] <ahasenack> back then, and now when reading it
[17:43] <bdmurray> we see what we want to see
[17:43] <bdmurray> the 17:07 run of britney also timed out talking to launchpad
[17:45] <ahasenack> yeah, lp is probably still sick
[17:45] <ahasenack> perfect storm
[17:45] <ahasenack> time_t, xz, outage
[17:46] <bdmurray> ☹
[17:54] <bdmurray> I'm in contact with IS
[18:14] <dbungert> tsimonq2: with the librarian 502ing it's hard to read the logs, but was the error you saw essentially https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/nGtVPxFXmR/ ?
[18:22] <bdmurray> It looks like a britney run finished but I don't see a new excuses yet
[18:26] <wxl> dbungert: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/f22XWVYPgN/
[18:27] <ahasenack> likewise, no backtrace at the end of the last log, but no updated excuses yet
[18:27] <ahasenack> log ends 5min ago
[18:32] <ahasenack> update_output.txt is also not updated yet
[19:07] <tsimonq2> dbungert, wxl: My point is, it would be able to resolve those dependencies if updates was enabled
[19:43] <jbicha> ubuntu-archive: please handle bug 2059967 LP is emitting fail to upload errors with the weekend rebuild
[19:43] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2059967 in kylin-display-switch (Ubuntu) "Please remove kylin-display-switch source from Ubuntu" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2059967
[20:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: abseil [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [20230802.1-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: abseil [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [20230802.1-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:05] <dbungert> LocutusOfBorg: abseil pulls in a year of changes.  Are you sure about that sync?
[20:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: abseil [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [20230802.1-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: abseil [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [20230802.1-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:16] <tsimonq2> gnome-online-accounts-gtk is incoming to noble source NEW per the request of fossfreedom_
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-online-accounts-gtk (noble-proposed/primary) [3.50.1-0ubuntu1]
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: abseil [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [20230802.1-3] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[20:43] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: WTW re: Beta Freeze?
[20:45] <tsimonq2> I see a block-all hint in place... if I had to *guess* I'd say we're already in Beta Freeze. No idea what the official plan is on that...
[20:47] <jbicha> Beta Freeze is different than the current migration freeze
[20:48] <tsimonq2> ah you're right
[20:49] <tsimonq2> *shrug* they'll announce it when they announce it, I guess :)
[20:52] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: given the way things are going - I'd plan on the beta being delayed a week
[20:53] <jbicha> +1
[20:55] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: ack :)
[21:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gnome-shell-pomodoro (noble-proposed/primary) [0.25.1-0ubuntu1]
[21:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvirt (focal-proposed/main) [6.0.0-0ubuntu8.17 => 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.18] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: rust-proc-macro-crate-1 (noble-proposed/primary) [1.3.1-1]
[23:52] <Eickmeyer> deathcollege: Kindly fix your connection. :)
[23:58] <deathcollege> Eickmeyer: sorry! was attacked, fixed
[23:58] <deathcollege> <3 have a good day, sorry for that !!
[23:58] <Eickmeyer> :)