[00:33] <batoms_> in intrepid when i use debuild from it pops up a dialog asking me for the password to sign the package...does anyone know how to turn this off
[00:33] <batoms_> so that it asks me for the password at the command line
[00:34] <batoms_> its annoying to be working in a terminal and then have to change focus to a dialog to enter the password
[00:35] <wgrant> batoms_: Try removing 'use-agent' from ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf
[00:41] <batoms_> wgrant: i would like to have the agent when using a GUI but not from the command line...do you know if this is possible?
[00:43] <wgrant> batoms_: Not sure.
[00:43] <wgrant> (heh, my typing of that last line was interrupted by that dialog popping up)
[01:10] <Ampelbein> batoms_: export GPG_AGENT_INFO=
[01:10] <Ampelbein> batoms_: that disables the use of seahorse (the graphical passphrase-thingie) for the current bash-session
[01:22] <jthm_guitarist> #xubuntu
[02:54] <MTecknology> Can I have just a static location to find the 64x64 image of a launchpad team?
[02:55] <MTecknology> +branding is restricted, maybe +images/+medium ?
[03:02] <wgrant> MTecknology: I don't know of any (except by parsing the RDF or XHTML), and others who might know are probably in the air at the moment.
[03:05] <MTecknology> k, thanks
[03:17] <MTecknology> wgrant: where does the medium image even show up?
[03:18] <wgrant> MTecknology: I don't think it does.
[03:18] <wgrant> I didn't think you could still set it.
[03:18] <MTecknology> interesting
[03:18] <wgrant> Oh.
[03:18] <wgrant> In the team maps, maybe?
[03:18] <wgrant> I remember something about them having to bring it back...
[03:19]  * wgrant hunts up bugs.
[03:20] <MTecknology> I was just wondering because it would be PERFECT if I could form a direct link to the medium image
[03:21] <wgrant> MTecknology: Bug #262739, bug #276329
[03:21] <wgrant> But they don't quite say what the current state is.
[03:21] <MTecknology> thanks :)
[04:18] <tansell> anyone here able to help me with https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/69460
[06:01]  * Hobbsee waves
[06:02] <RAOF> Howdie, Hobbsee!
[06:02] <Hobbsee> I'm hitting a few page timeouts.  Not sure if you guys know about them
[06:02] <Hobbsee> RAOF: :)
[06:05] <RAOF> Whoops, me too.
[06:07] <wgrant> Which?
[06:08] <RAOF> Bugpage for xserver-xorg-video-nouveau, here.
[06:09] <mrooney> Hmm, is the "Last Modified" time of branches broken? I see a graph for trunk but nothing for any other branches anymore
[06:10] <wgrant> mrooney: There's a bug about that.
[06:10] <wgrant> So yes, it's known.
[06:11] <mrooney> excellent
[06:11] <mrooney> I assumed it would be hard to miss
[06:12] <wgrant> Hmmm, I just got a 502 ('Please try again') from a page. Hobbsee, RAOF, is that what you got?
[06:15] <RAOF> Yup.
[06:15] <wgrant> Sounds like the appservers are dying again.
[06:19] <wgrant> I don't think this is the usual failure mode - it's very slow.
[06:19] <wgrant> And of course, we are probably going to have a lack of LOSAs for the next couple of days...
[06:50] <Hobbsee> wgrant: yeah
[08:02] <gnomefreak> launchpad is down?
[08:04] <jpds> gnomefreak: http://downforeveryoneorjustme.com/launchpad.net
[08:05] <noodles775> gnomefreak: confirmed... me too
[08:05] <gnomefreak> why werent the bugs or home page working but launchpad.net works :(
[08:06] <jpds> Everything's working here for me.
[08:07] <noodles775> gnomefreak: it seems to be that perhaps just one app server was down...
[08:07] <noodles775> gnomefreak: so just refreshing worked for me...
[08:07] <gnomefreak> ok i look and see if it happens to me again and i will try to refresh
[08:11] <gnomefreak> it seems i can open it again without refreshing but extreamly slow loading. slow >= 3minutes
[08:12] <gnomefreak> yep got the same message as before
[08:12] <gnomefreak> Sorry, there was a problem connecting to the Launchpad server.
[08:12] <gnomefreak> ok that is going to annoy me
[08:15] <noodles775> gnomefreak: what's the url you're trying?
[08:16] <gnomefreak> noodles775: any edge bugs pages after i click save changes
[08:16] <gnomefreak> noodles775: it has happens on 4 out of about 6
[08:17] <noodles775> gnomefreak: hmm... I saw the issue the first time I tried to submit a bug, but the second worked in a timely way... OK, so it seems at least one of the app servers is not healthy...
[08:18]  * noodles775 is trying to find someone who can help...
[08:25] <gnomefreak> let me know what we find out please
[08:28]  * Hobbsee tries https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubunet/+bug/375345 again, as requested
[08:33] <noodles775> gnomefreak: you're accessing edge right? (I'm seeing this on edge, but just want to confirm that you're also using edge?)
[08:33] <gnomefreak> noodles775: yeah i was just thinking abotu disabling it to see if regular works
[08:34] <noodles775> gnomefreak: thanks... yeah, it seems it's just one of the edge servers.
[08:34] <gnomefreak> noodles775: cool thanks
[08:47] <noodles775> gnomefreak: ok, can confirm that you shouldn't (now) see the 'please try again' on production, but may still experience it on edge for the next while
[08:48] <noodles775> it'll be fixed on edge also as soon as possible.
[08:48] <wgrant> Thanks noodles775.
[08:48] <gnomefreak> noodles775: ok thanks ill will check a bit later right now i am fighting with google and google is winning
[08:48] <noodles775> lol
[08:51] <noodles775> wgrant: np... thanks for noticing the icon inconsistencies!
[08:52] <wgrant> noodles775: Replying to that bug now...
[08:52] <noodles775> aha
[08:53] <wgrant> noodles775: Are the other icons being replaced, or are we going to have two new-style and several old-style ones in build listings?
[08:53] <gnomefreak> deepdyve it is now since google hates me today
[08:55] <noodles775> wgrant: I'm not certain... beuno is supplying the new icons...
[08:55] <wgrant> noodles775: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/gmpc-plugins/+builds is going to look pretty strange, even once the icon is unsquished.
[08:55] <noodles775> wgrant: currently we should be seeing:
[08:55] <noodles775> https://edge.launchpad.net/+graphics
[08:55] <wgrant> noodles775: Right, I know that page.
[08:55] <noodles775> except for those you noted in the bug (which I'll fix)
[08:56] <wgrant> I'm a bit confused as to why they weren't all replaced at the same time.
[08:58] <noodles775> wgrant: perhaps beuno was only able to get these new ones initially... not sure.
[08:58] <wgrant> noodles775: Possibly.
[09:01] <noodles775> gnomefreak: IS has bounced the bad edge server, so you should be able to use edge without problems (when you finish fighting google ;) )
[09:02] <gnomefreak> noodles775: thanks
[09:19] <geser> where do I report out-of-date mirrors? de.archive.u.c seems to got last updated in 2009-05-14
[09:20] <jpds> geser: Lemme go and poke the admin.
[09:38] <tansell> anyone able to help with https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/69460 ?
[09:39] <jml> tansell: not right now, I'm afraid.
[09:40] <tansell> dang, I'm up to three PPA archives now :(
[09:43] <jpds> geser: If you find another mirror out of sync please mail mirrors--at--ubuntu.com
[10:26] <zoobab01> hi
[10:26] <zoobab01> can someone help me with a dput.cf?
[10:26] <zoobab01> PPA keeps rejecting my packages
[10:27] <zoobab01> http://www.digitalmajority.org/forum/t-156535/fsfe:fsfe-submission-to-european-patent-office
[10:27] <zoobab01> sorry
[10:27] <zoobab01> Could not find PPA named 'ppa' for 'zoobab'
[10:28] <nicoInattendu> Can you paste your dput ?
[10:29] <nicoInattendu> Dput.cf I i mean
[10:36] <zoobab01> here: http://zoobab.wikidot.com/ubuntu-ppa-dput
[10:38] <wgrant> zoobab01: You don't have any OpenPGP keys associated with your account, nor do you have any PPAs...
[10:39] <zoobab01> https://launchpad.net/~bh-udev
[10:39] <wgrant> Then you want ~bh-udev
[10:39] <zoobab01> ah
[10:40] <zoobab01> now I understand
[10:40] <nicoInattendu> Try in 'incoming line' : incoming = ~zoobab/openamq/ubuntu
[10:40] <wgrant> That too.
[10:40] <nicoInattendu> incoming = ~zoobab/openamq/ubuntu/
[10:41] <nicoInattendu> cf here : https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA?action=show&redirect=PPAQuickStart#Uploading
[10:41] <wgrant> Or just 'dput ppa:~bh-udev/openamq some_version_source.changes'
[10:41] <wgrant> (if you are running Ubuntu 9.04 or later, IIRC)
[10:58] <J-_> Hello, there seems to be spam from either a bot, or person on Launchpad: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+question/70620 Please do something about it.
[11:13] <kaamos> hello. any launchpad devs around?
[11:40] <jml> kaamos: some are.
[11:41] <pcabido> Hi
[11:42] <pcabido> I have a question about the translations, where can I get permissions to upload translations for a project? Does the project owner have to give me permissions to do that?
[11:45] <wgrant> kfogel: Are you still expecting the ML and IRC discussion to go public in a week?
[11:45] <wgrant> I somehow doubt it.
[11:47] <kaamos> jml: I got some issues with managing a project, asked this question https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/71081 and was told to contact a launchpad dev here
[11:48] <wgrant> kaamos: You have two accounts.
[11:49] <wgrant> kaamos: alexey-kopytov and akopytov
[11:49] <wgrant> kaamos: You can merge them at https://launchpad.net/people/+requestmerge
[11:49] <kaamos> aha. wil do, thanks!
[11:50] <wgrant> I presume you were logged in with the wrong one.
[11:51] <kaamos> I don't think so, but let's see if merging will help
[11:51] <wgrant> Well, you asked the question as akopytov, but the project is owned by alexey-kopytov
[11:52] <kaamos> ok, so the person who transferred the ownership just did it for the wrong account
[11:53] <wgrant> Working now?
[11:54] <kaamos> wgrant: merging solved the problem, thanks a lot!
[11:54] <wgrant> kaamos: No problem.
[13:28] <goshawk> how do i detele packages from the launchpad ppa?
[13:29] <goshawk> i deleted with "delete packages" and they are not in the list anymore
[13:29] <goshawk> but they are published in the archive
[13:29] <savvas> you have to wait about 15 minutes :)
[13:30] <goshawk> so in 15 minutes i can upload the same package name with a different orig.tar.gz
[13:30] <goshawk> isn't it?
[13:30] <goshawk> cuz now it gets rejected cuz it's md5 differs
[13:30] <savvas> the same package name yes, the same package version no :)
[13:31] <savvas> for example, if it was ~ppagoshawk1 you have to increase it to ~ppagoshawk2
[13:31] <goshawk> yep, but my orig.tar.gz changes
[13:31] <goshawk> and it gets dropped
[13:31] <savvas> do you use "debuild -S -sa" ?
[13:31] <goshawk> File libqtd_0.1+20090519.orig.tar.gz already exists in PPA for D Programming Language Applications Packagers, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors.
[13:32] <goshawk> it's a package of VCS
[13:32] <goshawk> from a VCS
[13:32] <goshawk> so it sources vary everyday, and the one of yesterday failed due to a problem in the source
[13:32] <savvas> aaaahh... I don't think you can't different orig.tar.gz
[13:32] <savvas> *you can upload
[13:33]  * goshawk has to hack the package and fake the date of one day to get it uploaded
[13:33] <savvas> er..
[13:33] <savvas> why don't you just add the time hour/minute?
[13:34] <goshawk> uhm...
[13:34] <wgrant> I would do something like libqtd_0.1+bzr1234
[13:34] <savvas> libqtd_0.1+200905191434.orig.tar.gz :)
[13:34] <savvas> wgrant's suggestion is even better :P
[13:34] <goshawk> it's not bzr
[13:34] <wgrant> svn, then.
[13:34] <goshawk> but i'll do it
[13:34] <goshawk> adding a !
[13:34] <goshawk> 1
[13:34] <goshawk> to it
[13:34] <wgrant> Anything except CVS will have a revision number.
[14:14] <kfogel> wgrant: No, I'm going to update the schedule.  The open-sourcing date is not moving later, it's just hard to open up discussion without the sources available -- people don't know what they should say in public and what not.
[14:17] <wgrant> kfogel: Right, that's what I thought.
[14:17] <wgrant> I wondered how it was ever going to work.
[14:50] <kfogel> wgrant: schedule tweaked.  Note that the lists may still be opened up before July 21st, as we may do a soft rollout for the code.
[15:38] <savvas> is anyone using firefox? since there's a relative launchpad link, https://launchpad.net/codeofconduct/1.0.1/+download < Use "open" instead of save - does this mean launchpad is badly configured or firefox is badly coded ? bug 239952
[15:43] <gustavonarea> Hello. I'm using Bazaar's "--fixes" switch to mark a bug on launchpad.net as fixed. Shouldn't Launchpad.net mark the status of such a bug as "Fix committed"? For example, I tried "bzr commit --fixes lp:377991" (http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~gnarea/booleano/main/revision/43) but it didn't work: https://bugs.launchpad.net/booleano/+bug/377991
[15:55] <savvas> gustavonarea: I don't think they allowed that for all projects, only for ubuntu bugs and packaging - it probably is used to record it on a special variable that it fixes that bug
[15:56] <savvas> (I mean only recorded in the bzr branch)
[15:57] <gustavonarea> savvas: Thanks for the answer! But why would they do that? :-S
[15:58] <savvas> no idea, I'm not involved in launchpad - better wait for a correct answer or ask at http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad for more info :) also check out "bzr help bugs"
[15:59] <gustavonarea> savvas: ok, thanks once again! :)
[16:00] <savvas> np :)
[16:05] <Laney> I think it just links the bug
[16:05] <Laney> the branch to the bug*