[01:29] <coder543> so I've been looking into this problem off and on for quite awhile and I'm stuck. Why is it so hard to get a bzr branch to automatically build into a ppa? This is the project that I've got ready, but I have no idea how to get the ppa to function: https://launchpad.net/procmon
[01:30] <coder543> it's literally just one .c file and one .h file, which produce one binary file. There are no dependencies on anything beyond the standard c library.
[13:47] <alkisg> Hi, by default, when I build a package in my PPA that build-depends on other packages, does it use the (newer) versions of them that I provide in my PPA?
[13:49] <geser> yes, it uses apt to install the build dependencies
[13:50] <alkisg> Thank you
[14:40] <paultag> Were source recipies removed? I can't figure out how to make a new one
[14:41] <paultag> I see there's a link under `code', but it's not showing a creation link
[14:44] <james_w> paultag, you are looking at a branch page>
[14:44] <james_w> ?
[14:44] <paultag> james_w: https://code.launchpad.net/~fluxbox-maintainers/+recipes
[14:44] <paultag> that's where I ended up
[14:44] <james_w> odd
[14:44] <paultag> but I would rather like a way to roll out a new recipie
[14:45] <james_w> go to the page of the branch that you want to be the base branch
[14:45] <paultag> james_w: https://code.launchpad.net/~fluxbox-maintainers/fluxbox/development ←
[14:45] <james_w> "Create packaging recipe"
[14:45] <paultag> james_w: totally missed that. Thanks! :)
[18:12] <imbrandon> short of filling a bug against launchpad its self, is there a way for logged in "trusted" users to reports/delete/mark replies like https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+source/cloud-init/+bug/596993/comments/14 as SPAM ?
[18:13] <imbrandon> ( i know its sunday , so just *whenever* someone sees this, not urgent etc etc )
[18:18] <geser> during the week it seems to be sufficient to mention it here (as long as the help contact is present), during othertimes file a question
[18:20] <dobey> fwiw, that user had already been suspended. i've hidden that comment as well.
[18:21] <imbrandon> :) ty ty
[18:22] <imbrandon> just stumbled on it. suprisingly of 6 years using LP thats the first time i've come accross spam :)
[18:24] <imbrandon> would be a nice feature for people of certain teams and thus vetted to not be a bot most likely ( like ubuntu members or ubuntu-core-developers ) to flag items tooo , although like i said dosnt seem to be a big issue :)
[18:24] <imbrandon> enjoy the rest of the weekend ! cheers
[18:40] <hggdh> "You have reached your quota for directly contacting other Launchpad users. You can try again in 23 hours." <- I am sending an email on behalf of the membership Board. Can I get a waiver?
[18:43] <lifeless> hggdh: no, we have no facility for that.
[18:43] <hggdh> lifeless: thank you. I will keep on tomorrow, then
[18:43] <lifeless> imbrandon: http://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad - better than a bug for such data hygiene issues
[18:44] <lifeless> hggdh: (sorry; you may want to look and see if there is a bug about this limitation)
[18:45] <hggdh> lifeless: in all this time with UBuntu and LP, this is the very first time I needed it. Frankly, I do not see the need for a bug (once in 6 years does not a need make)


[02:58] <tatatang> 抱歉 \因為急需 請問 有無可以快速播放 比potplayer更好的軟體 先謝過!
[03:13] <freehaha> mplayer?
[03:14] <tatatang> kmplayer
[03:14] <tatatang> mplayer 是否就是kmplayer?
[03:15] <tatatang> 能否快播到32倍呢?
[03:24] <tammy> 請問 發現正體中文站好幾個link都壞掉了 應該要找誰修復?
[03:38] <freehaha> tatatang: you can speedup up to 6x only.. but why not just skip seconds if you are playing on 32x? you can barely see things in that pace
[03:39] <tatatang> OK first I thank u a lot , but I want to hear some mp3 records, just sounds, some sugestions said I can use some music edition software!
[03:40] <tatatang> so which one can speed up to 6 X?
[03:40] <freehaha> 不好意思剛剛輸入法有點問題
[03:40] <freehaha> mplayer 可以加速到 6x
[03:40] <freehaha> 用 [ ]
[03:41] <freehaha> (事實上應該是 mplayer2)
[03:42] <tatatang> 好的 那多謝了 我先試著用 非常感激感激!!!!:)
[03:42] <freehaha> ^^
[05:45] <pap> hihi..  does any one know how to solve empathy proxy problem in ubuntu 13.04 ?


[07:42] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: Wallpaper for 23.04 @ https://github.com/Xubuntu/xubuntu-artwork/commit/1341f1bbdcaba7a7602bd303540160639fc8ab40 (by knomepasi)
[07:45] <Unit193> \o/
[08:46] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: debian/copyright: Update copyright years @ https://github.com/Xubuntu/xubuntu-artwork/commit/16e34c13216031ecb0a56b8474cecf76addba698 (by bluesabre)
[08:53] -SwissBot:#xubuntu-devel- ::xubuntu-artwork:: Release xubuntu-artwork 23.04.1 @ https://github.com/Xubuntu/xubuntu-artwork/commit/66a56caff03a7a096a8b07976beb28b9d771ba0c (by bluesabre)
[09:03] <bluesabre> Thanks knome!
[09:03] <Unit193> bluesabre: So minimal is now an official thing and I should remove my ISOs and put the notice up?
[09:05] <bluesabre> Unit193: It might not hurt to keep your 22.04 ISO up, unless you want the bandwidth back. But yes, minimal is official and will have a published 23.04 iso.
[09:06] <Unit193> Sweet, thanks a ton!
[09:06] <Unit193> "...available on link:https://xubuntu.org/download/[xubuntu.org]." got a better link?
[09:08] <bluesabre> That will work. Probably need to work on the website a bit to make sure all the pieces play nice with the minimal iso.
[09:12] <Unit193> Yeah I meant mine, I'll put *whatever* you want on there though.  I can try to help with the Xubuntu one, but my contributions tend to be limited to fixing links.
[09:14] <bluesabre> Right, yes, I meant the Xubuntu website download page/release plugins will need tweaks. https://dpaste.com/C3FMDGVY4 seemed fine for your site :)
[09:17] <Unit193> Done!
[11:22] <knome_> bluesabre, yw


[19:15] <james_w> http://www.jonobacon.org/2009/03/24/ubuntu-members-get-free-lwn-subs/
[21:04] <Tumie> is their somebody from the UK here ?


[03:18] <fabbione> BenC: thanks
[03:34] <AlmightyCthulhu> bug 251338
[03:34] <AlmightyCthulhu> when can the patch for this be applied to Ubuntu?
[03:34] <AlmightyCthulhu> https://launchpad.net/bugs/251338
[03:58] <BenC> AlmightyCthulhu: I'll see about getting it into hardy and intrepid
[03:58] <AlmightyCthulhu> BenC: Thanks, I put Matthew Garrett's patch on there
[03:58] <AlmightyCthulhu> if that helps
[04:17] <AlmightyCthulhu> BenC: Any idea why the audio wouldn't come back from suspend?
[04:17] <AlmightyCthulhu> it does on kernel 2.6.26, but nothing earlier
[19:05] <bewst1> BenC or anybody else: having this problem building the intrepid kernel from git on hardy: http://dpaste.com/70040/
[19:06] <bewst1> I mention BenC because I see he has had a similar problem (only worse): http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2008/07/07/%23ubuntu-kernel.html
[19:06] <bewst1> Can anyone help?
[19:17] <naxxtor> n/names
[19:17] <naxxtor> oops
[20:23] <superm1> BenC, re http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-intrepid.git;a=commit;h=67c6d0baed34e5a439ddb7003a70abe0c327fc7b i did it that way because that meant upstream sources could just be extracted right into the tree
[20:23] <superm1> without needing to modify things
[20:23] <mkrufky> ...speaking of which.....
[20:24] <mkrufky> that gpio call to ivtv should be changed to happen by default in the ivtv driver, regardless of lirc being present
[20:24] <mkrufky> and the lirc_pvr150 module can work with pvrusb2, hvr1950, hvr1900, and all ivtv boards
[20:24] <mkrufky> also hvr1800 hvr1250 hvr1200 hvr1700 etc
[20:25] <mkrufky> whomever called it lirc_pvr150 -- its a misnomer ....  should have been called lirc_zilog
[20:25] <superm1> the original author of the module i believe was testing it with a pvr150
[20:26] <superm1> but that sounds sensible
[20:26] <mkrufky> it would be better to toggle the gpio regardless inside ivtv, so that you (lirc) wont need to depend on that symbol export
[20:27] <mkrufky> and he probably tested with pvr150 because that (i believe) is the first board to use the zilog recv / blaster
[20:27] <mkrufky> ...many folks dont realize that most hauppauge boards use zilog
[20:28] <superm1> could you get that changed inside ivtv?
[20:29] <mkrufky> id recommend that instead, just forward that ubuntu patch to the ivtv maintainer and let him integrate it
[20:29] <mkrufky> Hans Verkuil
[20:29] <mkrufky> its a single call to a gpio that pulls the zilog out of reset
[20:29] <superm1> alright
[20:29] <mkrufky> 1 line of code
[20:30] <mkrufky> \i would imagine its an UBUNTU SAUCE patch
[20:30]  * mkrufky looks
[20:30] <BenC> superm1: but it was broken because we can't dpkg-source the tree with symlinks in it like that
[20:31] <BenC> superm1: I know it was upstream that was lame...I certainly wasn't pointing at you for that :)
[20:31] <superm1> BenC, oh i suppose I didn't test dpkg-source'ing.  I just built the packages directly from the tree
[20:31] <mkrufky> hmm.. .i just looked thru intrepid history and i dont see that patch in ivtv at all
[20:53] <BenC> mjg59: I did a huge cleanup on toshiba_acpi 0.19a (and called it 0.20) and planned on sending it upstream...care to test it before hand (or make some suggestion why it shouldn't go upstream)?
[21:42] <tormod> can someone please take a look at bug #192772 (tim is on vacation IIRC)
[22:00]  * laga waves
[22:01] <laga> are there known problem with aufs/unionfs and NFS in intrepid? launchpad doesn't seem to list any
[22:02] <laga> my diskless clients OOPS when early userspace uses mkdir
[22:34] <mjg59> BenC: It's kind of dead (based on the original developer0 - there's an effort to rewrite it from scratch. On the other hand, any cleanups to the existing code are probably worth it
[22:35] <pwnguin> BenC: there's a toshiba-linux mailing list that kinda looks officalish
[22:36] <pwnguin> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Flinux.toshiba-dme.co.jp%2Flinux%2F&ei=w2qbSLE-jOq8BcH9wJQG&usg=AFQjCNF1ORipJY8hNVy11IXquVQUxBVtLA&sig2=eVDLkyEixzNjDv_H80fI5A
[22:36] <pwnguin> doh
[22:36] <pwnguin> linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/
[22:41] <laga> okay, i've created a new bug report and attached some logs. bug #255874
[22:42] <BenC> mjg59: since toshib.ko's interface is duplicated in toshiba_acpi, should we just disable the former in our tree?
[23:30] <BenC> laga: unionfs in ubuntu doesn't support NFS...I'de be surprised if aufs did
[23:31] <laga> aufs did, in hardy.
[23:31] <laga> in fact, that was the reason why i was pestering everyone to include aufs in hardy ;)