[01:05] <ubotu> Minataku called the ops in #kubuntu
[01:33] <PriceChild> Hey rajkalyan, can we help? :)
[01:37] <rajkalyan> sure;)
[01:37] <rajkalyan> my laptop cant reboot
[01:38] <PriceChild> Please join #ubuntu for support questions :)
[01:38] <rajkalyan> ok
[01:48] <Tm_T> !away > juss01-bed
[02:01] <PriceChild> *thinks those two need watching in -offtopic* night
[02:08] <gnomefreak> pick 2
[02:45] <ubotu> __mikem called the ops in #ubuntu
[02:47] <nalioth> fallanA/A is not a nice person
[04:30] <ttmrichter> Can I please get access to #ubuntu again?
[04:34] <ttmrichter> Hello?  Any chance I can get back into #ubuntu to ask support questions?
[04:38] <nalioth> ttmrichter: why can't you get in now?
[04:38] <ttmrichter> Some kind of router exploit thing.
[04:38] <ttmrichter> I needed to change the access port, etc.
[04:41] <nalioth> ahh
[04:41] <nalioth> ttmrichter: stand by for testing
[04:42] <nalioth> ttmrichter: thanks for your patience :) you can join #ubuntu now.
[04:42] <Hobbsee> hi all
[04:42] <Vorian> hiya Hobbsee :)
[04:43] <Hobbsee> :)
[04:45] <ttmrichter> Thank you.
[05:29] <ubotu> PurpZeY called the ops in #ubuntu
[05:36] <Hobbsee> hey mneptok!
[05:36] <mneptok> BOING BOING!
[05:37] <Hobbsee> hehe :)
[05:37] <Hobbsee> mneptok: LTNS
[05:37] <mneptok> ohcrap! i owe Cory an e-mail! :-O
[05:37] <Hobbsee> oh dear
[05:37] <Hobbsee> "this is an email.  mneptok."
[05:37] <mneptok> Hobbsee: i have been hiding in a cold, dark room. weeping gently that my deep and abiding love for you shall remain forever unrequited.
[05:37] <mneptok> oh, and getting drunk on antifreeze.
[05:38] <Hobbsee> mneptok: hahaha.  poor you
[05:38] <Hobbsee> is the antifreeze tasty?
[05:38] <mneptok> more so than the bitter taste of your rejection
[05:38] <capiCrimm> can I be tested?
[05:38] <Hobbsee>  __________________
[05:38] <Hobbsee> < BAAAA @ mneptok  >
[05:38] <Hobbsee>  ------------------
[05:38] <Hobbsee>         \   ^__^
[05:38] <Hobbsee>          \  (oo)\_______
[05:38] <Hobbsee>             (__)\       )\/\
[05:38] <Hobbsee>                 ||----w |
[05:38] <Hobbsee>                 ||     ||
[05:39] <TheSheep> I guess that was kind of discouraging >_<
[05:40] <mneptok> grrr. who decided the visor module isn't necessary?
[05:40] <mneptok> *stab*
[05:40] <Hobbsee> me
[05:40] <mneptok> *STAB*
[05:40] <mneptok> capiCrimm: did someone help you out?
[05:40] <capiCrimm> no
[05:40] <mneptok> sec
[05:40] <Hobbsee> mneptok: i'm a core dev remember?  i can do things that effect your system :)
[05:41] <mneptok> capiCrimm: you seem to be OK
[05:42] <capiCrimm> mneptok, cool.
[05:42] <capiCrimm> do I get unbanned now?
[05:42] <mneptok> already been done :)
[05:43] <capiCrimm> cool. gracia
[05:43] <mneptok> thanks for flying Ubuntu Airways
[05:44] <Hobbsee> mneptok: dont drown your sorrows too much!
[05:54] <mneptok> hehehe
[05:59] <ajmitch> scary people
[06:03] <mneptok> afraid that no one around here comprehends my potato. guess i'm only a Spud-Boy looking for the real tomato.
[06:37] <effraie> thanks, jenda
[07:16] <ubotu> bruenig called the ops in #ubuntu
[09:58] <ubotu> wols called the ops in #ubuntu
[10:01] <ubotu> In #ubuntu, Sepero said: ubotu: I think there is a bug in your code. Sometimes it doesn't post anything when given a direct command.
[10:08] <Myrtti> shouldn't wols's discussion about ops be done here
[10:08] <Hobbsee> probably
[10:09] <Hobbsee> but i dont want him bitching in here forever either
[10:15] <crdlb> :/
[10:17] <Hobbsee> the crazies are out.  long live the crazies.
[10:53] <rdominguez> holaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
[11:04] <ompaul> ohhh noes it is mc44
[11:04] <mc44> I didn't touch it!
[11:04] <ompaul> you wanted to, admit it
[11:04] <mc44> always :)
[11:04] <ompaul> see guilty by association :P
[11:19] <GazzaK> can I touch it?
[11:21] <ompaul> GazzaK: did you have to ask?
[11:21] <ompaul> the answer is no
[11:21] <GazzaK> well, I thought it polite
[11:22] <ompaul> :)
[11:22] <GazzaK> :'(
[11:22] <ompaul> GazzaK: stop playing the victim
[11:22] <GazzaK> but I do that so well
[11:22] <ompaul> no you don't
[11:23] <ompaul> in fact, "ohh no you do not!"
[11:23] <GazzaK> lol
[11:23] <GazzaK> ompaul, going to LRL?
[11:23] <ompaul> my answer is no
[11:23] <GazzaK> meh
[11:23] <ompaul> I would like to but there is this thing called a holiday
[11:23] <ompaul> it is booked for two weekends after that event, and I have to do some work before I go
[11:24] <ompaul> so time is running out for all of us involved
[11:29] <ubotu> OmegaCenti called the ops in #ubuntu
[11:56] <ubotu> Flannel called the ops in #ubuntu
[11:59] <Flannel> gnomefreak: what's up?
[11:59] <gnomefreak> lmc_phx > wow, if you type your password..... what else was there?
[12:00] <Flannel> Nothing, just that.  It's a common troll thing in rooms like this.  They get people to type their passwords to try out the *** thing.
[12:00] <Flannel> I guess it's a kneejerk reaction for me, seen it often
[12:01] <gnomefreak> Flannel: ill watch for a while and see where it goes
[12:01] <Myrtti> /quit and /exit were fighting. /Exit got a nosebleed and /quit fainted. Which one
[12:01] <Myrtti> won
[12:02] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: you used to be well normal :(
[12:02] <gnomefreak> what happened
[12:02] <gnomefreak> ;)
[12:02] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: bug 122989 nice title :)
[12:02] <ubotu> Launchpad bug 122989 in firefox "ZOMG THIS UBUNTU KILLED MY DOG" [Undecided,Won't fix]  https://launchpad.net/bugs/122989
[12:03] <Myrtti> wth
[12:05] <Hobbsee> :D
[12:06] <elkbuntu> ...
[12:13] <ajmitch> haha
[12:13] <ajmitch> gnomefreak: sorry, Hobbsee was never normal
[12:14] <gnomefreak> :)
[12:18] <joejaxx> wow this channel is super large now
[12:18] <joejaxx> :P
[12:20] <ajmitch> right
[12:29] <elkbuntu> unfortunately yes
[12:29] <ajmitch> sorry, I shouldn't be here really
[12:30] <joejaxx> hello ajmitch elkbuntu :)
[12:30] <elkbuntu> hi joejaxx
[12:52] <F00BaR> why
[12:52] <F00BaR> am
[12:52] <F00BaR> i
[12:52] <F00BaR> banned
[01:04] <F00BaR`> ??
[01:05] <F00BaR`> what do you want
[01:07] <jrib> F00BaR`: hi, you were affected by a router bug.  Have you read the page about it and fixed it?
[01:07] <jrib> oh wait, I think you were... let me check actually
[01:08] <jrib> ah I see now.
[01:08] <jrib> F00BaR`: away scripts are not ok in #ubuntu, can you please disable that?
[01:08] <jrib> yeah, that
[01:09] <jrib> just make sure it does not print to #ubuntu
[01:39] <Pici> heh
[01:39] <F00BaR`> :P
[01:40] <gnomefreak> i hope that isnt a away message
[01:41] <F00BaR`> im just screwin with ya
[01:46] <Pumpernickel> Being banned must be more fun than I thought.
[01:46] <Hobbsee> heh
[01:46] <gnomefreak> ;) i almost did
[02:14] <Hobbsee> hooray.
[02:15] <jrib> F00BaR`: ?
[02:15] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: can you test a website in konq for me real fast, let me know if it crashes?
[02:15] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: sure
[02:15] <gnomefreak> jrib: he said he wasnt using one but it looks like away message to me
[02:15] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: www.kombirom.nl/online
[02:15] <jrib> it doens't show up in #ubuntu though
[02:16] <Hobbsee> jrib: probably as he couldnt talk there, due to the ban forward.
[02:16] <gnomefreak> jrib: he keeps it up an op will think he is using one and get removed
[02:16] <jrib> Hobbsee: he's there since I only banned his nick
[02:16] <Hobbsee> which i believe will still not let him send ot the channel
[02:17] <jrib> well, he changed his nick
[02:17] <gnomefreak> F00BaR`: type something in #ubuntu please
[02:18] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak:
[02:18] <Hobbsee>
[02:18] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: ?
[02:18] <Hobbsee>
[02:18] <Hobbsee> grrr
[02:18] <gnomefreak> lol
[02:19] <Hobbsee> get.asp ....etc
[02:19] <Hobbsee> ie a crash, yes
[02:19] <gnomefreak> good
[02:19] <gnomefreak> than i was right :)
[02:20] <gnomefreak> ty Hobbsee :)
[02:20] <Hobbsee> :)
[02:21] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: no fear i think its a site crash so konq should be good :)
[02:21] <F00BaR`> gnomefreak why
[02:21] <gnomefreak> F00BaR`: because we want to know if you can type in htere
[02:22] <gnomefreak> ty
[02:22] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: he can send to #ubuntu
[02:22] <F00BaR`> lol why
[02:22] <jrib> because of you're away messages in this channel
[02:22] <jrib> your even
[02:23] <gnomefreak> oh this is bad
[02:23] <F00BaR`> /me is back
[02:23] <F00BaR`> /me is now away
[02:23] <F00BaR`> thats what im doing here :P
[02:23] <Hobbsee> you do know that you're not funny, dont you?
[02:23] <gnomefreak> F00BaR`: please stop doing it or someone will remove you
[02:24] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: he can continue being immature in here if he likes.  even better if he has a +q
[02:24] <gnomefreak> ok works for me
[02:25] <Hobbsee> gnomefreak: but the fact of the matter is, until he starst to behave responsibly, and either add nothing, or something  useful to the channel, he cant stay in #ubuntu
[02:25] <gnomefreak> true
[03:15] <Pici> ...
[03:15] <Pici> F00BaR's thing just went off in #ubuntu
[03:16] <jrib> banned for a while this time
[03:16] <Hobbsee> oh good, you got him
[03:16] <Hobbsee> bf him to here, maybe
[03:16] <Hobbsee> or not
[03:16] <jrib> he knows
[03:17] <Hobbsee> true
[03:17] <Pici> hes already here
[03:18] <Hobbsee> point
[03:35] <F00BaR`> how do i tuurn off auto away
[03:35] <gnomefreak> F00BaR`: the oppisite way you turned it on
[03:36] <F00BaR`> i didnt
[03:37] <F00BaR`> thrtr
[03:37] <F00BaR`> done
[03:37] <F00BaR`> turned off the messages
[03:37] <gnomefreak> F00BaR`: you or a script had to, ther eis no client that i know of that uses it as default
[03:37] <F00BaR`> nnscript does
[03:37] <Hobbsee> then remove the script, or fix it
[03:37] <F00BaR`> i have
[03:40] <Hobbsee> good
[03:40] <jrib> F00BaR`: are you sure this time?  If it goes off again I'm banning you for a month, agreed?
[03:40] <F00BaR`> agreed
[05:03] <elkbuntu> Hobbsee, have you noted osxdude|laptop's 'real name'?
[05:04] <Hobbsee> elkbuntu: have now
[05:04] <Hobbsee> wonderful
[05:04] <elkbuntu> yeah
[05:11] <ubotu> stefg called the ops in #ubuntu
[05:23] <elkbuntu> NUKE HIM!
[05:24] <nixternal> Hobbsee: you cheated! :)
[05:24] <Hobbsee> hehe
[05:24] <Hobbsee> how?
[05:24] <nixternal> I opped first, you punched first :)
[05:24] <Hobbsee> hehe
[05:24] <nixternal> just woke up, so I am still a little slow
[05:25] <nixternal> iirc, that isn't the first time he has done that either
[05:25] <Hobbsee> i thought that was another one
[05:26] <gnomefreak> you have got to be frigging kidding me
[05:26] <gnomefreak> he got himself banned again?
[05:28] <nixternal> gnomefreak: he is quite popular amongst the ban lists I have noticed :)
[05:28] <gnomefreak> it figures
[05:30] <gnomefreak> Hobbsee: can we ban him for even bringing up that word in -devel :(
[05:31] <Hobbsee> haha
[05:31] <Hobbsee> sure!
[05:32] <gnomefreak> in -devel non the less
[05:32] <gnomefreak> none*
[05:51] <nixternal> 10 minutes until GPLv3...yay!
[05:52] <PriceChild> :)
[05:52] <nixternal> http://livestream.fsf.org:8800
[05:55] <PriceChild> who is osxdude btw elkbuntu/Hobbsee ?
[05:55] <Hobbsee> no idea
[05:55] <elkbuntu> PriceChild, some obnoxious idiot
[05:55] <jussi01> hi ops! can someone tell me how to change back from /away?
[05:56] <PriceChild> oh was just going on the real name comment earlier... "watches in #ubuntu"
[05:56] <PriceChild> jussi01, "/away" wish no args
[05:56] <jussi01> PriceChild: ty
[05:56] <jussi01> PriceChild: doesnt work...
[05:57] <PriceChild> /back ?
[05:58] <jussi01> yeps, thanks
[05:58] <jussi01> :)
[06:03] <PriceChild> nixternal, just started ;)
[06:06] <nixternal> OK, quit watching...it keeps buffering for me :)
[06:06] <PriceChild> same
[08:18] <ubotu> In ubotu, recon said: life is a theological debate.
[08:24] <Pici> Theological? I would have said philosophical.
[08:26] <jrib> box of chocolates?
[08:26] <PriceChild> Pici, debate it with him
[08:29] <GazzaK> yes please jrib
[08:31] <jrib> too late, all gone
[08:54] <ubotu> osxdude|palmTX called the ops in #ubuntu-bots
[11:13] <Jordan_U> It looks like RAF<EMAIL_ADDRESS>May have been testing getting ready for a larger flood in #ubuntu


[01:44] <nigelb> bdmurray, I did some edits to the patch subscription script and pushed to my own branch.  can take a look?
[01:44] <nigelb> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-qa-tools/patch-review-script/annotate/head%3A/launchpadlib-scripts/patch-subscriber.py
[01:51] <bdmurray> nigelb: seems fine but I don't see any reason to reduce the list of workflow_teams as they might be subscribed to old bug reports and it doesn't hurt does it?
[01:51] <nigelb> bdmurray, I wanted to talk to the old workflow teams and help extend dholbach's resubscribe script for those teams too
[01:52] <nigelb> like subscribe ubuntu-sru where motu-sru is subscribed etc, persia_ encouraged me to talk to the team owners about that
[01:53] <nigelb> and i've added one more package to jfo's list and one more package to be ignored :)
[01:53] <bdmurray> okay but if an old team is subscribed to a bug with a patch and then the reviewers team gets subscribed to it what will the reviewers team do?
[01:53] <bdmurray> nigelb: yes I saw those other changes too thanks!
[01:54] <nigelb> No, what I meant is, daniel's script subscribes sponsors if u-u-s or u-m-s is subscribed to a bug
[01:55] <nigelb> so if we can give the old teams an extend of that script to be run occasionally, they can take care of it
[01:55] <nigelb> we might not have anything to review on a motu-sru bug, we'll just delay it
[01:55] <bdmurray> right and if a bug with u-u-s subscribed shows up in our search results with your branch the reviewers team will be subscribed to it
[01:56] <bdmurray> because your branch removes u-u-s from workflow teams
[01:56] <nigelb> aah. ok.  common sense.  I should have left them there :D
[01:56] <bdmurray> so if you fix that I'll be happy to merge it
[01:58] <nigelb> ubuntu-ma-sponsors should be ubuntu-main-sponsors?
[01:59] <bdmurray> why yes!
[02:02] <nigelb> ok, so here goes
[02:02] <nigelb> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~nigelbabu/ubuntu-qa-tools/patch-review-script/annotate/head%3A/launchpadlib-scripts/patch-subscriber.py
[02:02] <nigelb> shall I request a merge?
[07:16] <dholbach> good morning
[15:15] <nigelb> I'm slowly working on the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/GettingInvolved to incorporate examples.  If someone would like to give suggestions, correction, please let me know
[15:16] <nigelb> hyperair, poke
[17:11] <nigelb> bdmurray, you want me to request a sync for the script?
[17:12] <bdmurray> nigelb: a merge proposal would help thanks
[17:12] <nigelb> bdmurray, will do.  I wasn't sure how to go about it :)
[17:35] <nigelb> persia, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam/GettingInvolved
[17:35] <nigelb> any more suggestions?
[17:40] <nigelb> bdrung, got a minute?
[17:41] <bdrung> nigelb: at least three seconds ;)
[17:41] <bdrung> *at most
[17:41] <nigelb> can sign up for a few hours at  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatchDay?
[17:43] <nigelb> bdrung, ^
[17:48] <bdrung> nigelb: will have a look at it later
[17:48] <nigelb> bdrung, thank you :) even 1 hour is much appreciated :)
[18:24]  * nigelb notes that there is still 40 slots open
[18:42] <Ciemon> nigelb: I just had a look at PatchDay, I wonder if that's something for someone with minimal experience.. like me?
[18:43] <nigelb> Ciemon, yep it is.  you're welcome to contribute
[18:43] <nigelb> you need to be able to test patches and if working, encourage patch author to forward to upstream bug tracker
[18:44] <nigelb> Ciemon, the reviewers team doesn't have too much requirements, see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReviewersTeam
[18:44] <Ciemon> OK, I'll have had more practice my then; and I see the "bugs with patches added" link.
[18:46] <Ciemon> yeah, I've read ReviewersTeam before.. interesting that you've said that the patch author shold forward upstream. Is that "policy"?
[18:46] <Ciemon> It's something I want to make happen with the batch I'm working through at the moment.
[18:46] <nigelb> Ciemon, the idea is the author should be able to respond to feedback
[18:47] <nigelb> Ciemon, but if patch author shows no response, we'll have to forward
[18:47]  * Ciemon ponders
[18:49] <nigelb> Ciemon, upstream might ask for changes or give comments, its easier if the patch author does it him/her-self
[18:50] <Ciemon> ok
[18:51] <nigelb> I'm off.  ask any questions here, I'll reply in scroll back if noone else does :)
[18:54] <Ciemon> Thanks.. no questions for now, just practise.


[00:11] <ojwb> afternoon
[00:18] <kcj> Afternoon.
[00:27] <hads> ibeardslee: Thanks
[00:49] <ibeardslee> hads: n/p
[00:52] <ajmitch> seems to just about be more nz people in there than others now
[19:39] <chilts> morning
[20:27] <ibeardslee> morning
[20:28] <mwhudson> morning
[20:53] <ajmitch> morning
[20:53] <thumper> morning
[21:20] <kcj> Morning
[22:50] <ojwb> morning
[23:38] <Atamira> morning


[02:17] <shaunh> Just loaded studio on my laptop.
[02:19] <shaunh> Later I'm going to try to get SEQ24 linked to Jack.  Any help/advice welcome.
[03:11] <computer1> hi i am having some problems ... -need help :(
[03:11] <computer1> i have an error report...
[03:11] <computer1> :(
[03:14] <cfhowlett> !details | computer1
[03:21] <computer1> http://pastebin.com/PvTevdRi
[03:23] <computer1> ubuntu studio wont install says partman error
[03:27] <cfhowlett> computer1, put your paste on fpaste.org             (pastebin is blocked in Beijing.   don't ask me why)
[03:29] <computer1> http://fpaste.org/137075/
[03:32] <cfhowlett> !raid | computer1, ah, it's a raid/lvm.   I'm a raid virgin.  ask the #ubuntu-server channel.
[03:33] <computer1> thanx 4 looking ill check it out ;)
[03:38] <holstein> computer1: are you trying to get faster write speed with raid?
[07:02] <jarnos> Has ubuntustudio changed the default font in xfce4-terminal?
[09:47] <shaunh> I'm a total newbie. Please can anyone advise me how to conect SEQ24 Jack?
[09:49] <shaunh> SEQ24 to QJackclt
[10:28] <zequence> shaunh: Check out #opensourcemusicians. More active users there.
[10:29] <shaunh> Thanks - will do.
[11:58] <shaunh> All  sorted :-)
[13:31] <paul_> I have X startup issues. I use xfce4 on Ubuntu Studio
[13:32] <cfhowlett> !details | paul_
[13:32] <paul_> I get what seems to be multiple startups - first the xfce default graphic, then a gradient, but never the graphics I set it to through the background settings. Also, conky, which starts at the beginning of the session, gets clobbered (but stays in the background)
[13:34] <paul_> Conky "disappears" when the gradient background comes up.
[13:35] <paul_> And it stays on the gradient background
[13:37] <paul_> I will search for errors, but is there a pastebin on my xchat app, or do you mean pastebin on a particular website?
[13:46] <paul_> I can't find anything suspicious under dmesg, Xorg.0.log, syslog, or kern.log. I then think something is misconfigured in a file somewhere. Anyone know where xfce configuration files are found?
[13:51] <holstein> paul_: i sleep my startup of conky, but, i suggest removing it from the equation there, and test what is your issue
[13:51] <holstein> paul_: *all* configs are in your user's /home, but i would look at the graphics driver
[13:51] <holstein> i would also go upstream to the #xubuntu channel or #ubuntu
[13:56] <paul_> I think it might go back to my deciding to use gradients some time ago, but then changing my mind and  using graphics. I see this as xfce not "forgetting" my old config and just going through everything. I am not sure how you see this as a driver issue. For the record, I have an Nvidia driver for a zotac GTX/650 card.
[13:56] <holstein> paul_: i dont, friend
[13:57] <holstein> paul_: i see *lots* of simlar issues that end up being nvidia driver related, which is why i volunteer the suggestion
[13:58] <holstein> its quite easy to take a live CD of 14.04 and test with your specific hardware and a "default" config.. if you feel that would be helpful
[13:58] <paul_> should I use a generic driver? if so what do you recommend?
[13:58] <holstein> paul_: the problem is, *i* cant recommend one. the ideal sceario would be, nvidia would recomend on.. but, they dont
[13:58] <holstein> paul_: im not saying its a driver issue, just that, you may want to consider troubleshooting for that
[13:59] <paul_> ok thanks
[14:02] <paul_> I went through the hardware menu and found a dialog for "NVIDIA X Server settings". It has the NVIDIA logo on the top right corner. I suspect this is their proprietary driver.
[14:04] <paul_> Anyway, I have enough to go on to do some snooping. thanks for the input.
[23:08] <OvenWerks> holstein: Do you use electric bass as well as upright? Do you have any opinion on strings? I am looking at upgrading my fretless (an old beat up squire I ripped the frets out of) to a nice bass.
[23:15] <OvenWerks> I have been using half round strings on both my Ric as well as the squire with no obvious wear to the finger board. However, It seems the "flat wound" strings are very common on fretless and seem to still have some brightness on the bass I was looking at.
[23:16] <OvenWerks> The one I was looking at is the Ibanez Portamento which has piezos under the bridges, so that may be more of the brightness than strings.
[23:21] <OvenWerks> I would have the choice between 4 and 5 string, but my experience has been the low D is nice but by the time I hit C it is pretty muddy, so I am not sure on that either.