[02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gsettings-ubuntu-touch-schemas [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.0.7+17.10.20170922-0ubuntu1]
[02:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (artful-proposed) [7.5.0+17.10.20171004-0ubuntu1]
[03:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcre3 (artful-proposed/main) [2:8.39-5 => 2:8.39-5ubuntu1] (core)
[03:18] <elopio> Hello. Is there a way to run autopkgtests when a PPA is updated?
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: diagnostics (artful-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-12 => 0.3.3-12build1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted diagnostics [source] (artful-proposed) [0.3.3-12build1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ivtools (artful-proposed/universe) [1.2.11a1-9 => 1.2.11a1-9build1] (no packageset)
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ivtools [source] (artful-proposed) [1.2.11a1-9build1]
[05:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dput [source] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu4]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dict-ss [source] (artful-proposed) [20070206-4ubuntu3]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dput [source] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu4]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcre3 [source] (artful-proposed) [2:8.39-5ubuntu1]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dict-zu [source] (artful-proposed) [20070207-5ubuntu2]
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.8-race-detector-runtime [source] (artful-proposed) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu2]
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ocaml [source] (artful-proposed) [4.04.0-2ubuntu4]
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libexif [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.6.21-2.1]
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsemanage [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.7-2]
[05:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dict-ss [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [20070206-4ubuntu3] (ubuntu-desktop)
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted graphicsmagick [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.3.26-13]
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nettle [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.3-2]
[05:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libva [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.8.3-2]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-gnome-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [0.81]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [1.403]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntustudio-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [0.173]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [1.205]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [2.218]
[05:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntukylin-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [0.26]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsdl2 [source] (artful-proposed) [2.0.6+dfsg1-2ubuntu2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (artful-proposed) [1:17.10.7]
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dict-ss [amd64] (artful-proposed) [20070206-4ubuntu3]
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-1.9-race-detector-runtime [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.0+svn285455-0ubuntu1]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-defaults (artful-proposed/main) [3.6.3-0ubuntu1 => 3.6.3-0ubuntu2] (core)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openoverlayrouter (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+ds1-1 => 1.1.1+ds1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openoverlayrouter [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.1+ds1-1ubuntu1]
[06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-meta [source] (artful-proposed) [1.358]
[06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dcm2niix (artful-proposed/universe) [1.0.20170818-1.1~build1 => 1.0.20170923-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-defaults [source] (artful-proposed) [3.6.3-0ubuntu2]
[06:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcm2niix [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.0.20170923-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipa (artful-proposed/universe) [4.4.4-1 => 4.4.4-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipa [sync] (artful-proposed) [4.4.4-3]
[06:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sparkleshare [source] (artful-proposed) [1.5.0-2ubuntu1]
[07:04] <doko> I accepted packages which should be uncontroversal. I left the others ...
[07:33] <apw> doko, heh thanks, and ugg :)
[08:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: batik (artful-proposed/universe) [1.9-2 => 1.9-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clojure (artful-proposed/universe) [1.8.0-2 => 1.8.0-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted batik [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.9-3]
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cobertura (artful-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>+dfsg-4 => 2.1.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clojure [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.8.0-3]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cobertura [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.1.1-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freehep-chartableconverter-plugin (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0-9 => 2.0-10] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freehep-chartableconverter-plugin [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.0-10]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lombok-ast (artful-proposed/universe) [0.2+ds-2 => 0.2+ds-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lombok-patcher (artful-proposed/universe) [0.22-1 => 0.22-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lombok-ast [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.2+ds-3]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lombok-patcher [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.22-2]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: maven-dependency-plugin (artful-proposed/universe) [3.0.1-1 => 3.0.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.10.0-37.41~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed/main) [4.10.0-37.41] (core, kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted maven-dependency-plugin [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.0.1-2]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.10.0-37.41~16.04.1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (zesty-proposed) [4.10.0-37.41]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-shell (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu2] (desktop-extra, mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openjdk-8-jre-dcevm (artful-proposed/universe) [8u112-1 => 8u112-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openjdk-8-jre-dcevm [sync] (artful-proposed) [8u112-2]
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xmlgraphics-commons (artful-proposed/universe) [2.1-2 => 2.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xmlgraphics-commons [sync] (artful-proposed) [2.2-1]
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sikulix (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sikulix [source] (artful-proposed) [1.1.1-2ubuntu1]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server (artful-proposed/main) [2:1.19.3-1ubuntu7 => 2:1.19.4-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, xorg)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gce-compute-image-packages (artful-proposed/universe) [20170921+dfsg1-0ubuntu1 => 20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-cloud)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gce-compute-image-packages [source] (artful-proposed) [20171006+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]
[09:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2]
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:06] <apw> tseliot, in your artful nvidia-prime upload you update your debhelper depends version but not the compat version in debian/compat ... is this intended ?
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (artful-proposed) [2.18-0ubuntu4]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poppler [source] (artful-proposed) [0.57.0-2ubuntu3]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-3ubuntu1]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted accountsservice [source] (artful-proposed) [0.6.42-0ubuntu3]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2]
[09:33] <tseliot> apw: err... no, actually, if I update the debian/compat file, I can probably drop the "--with python3" in the debian/rules
[09:33] <tseliot> apw: if you reject that, I'll reupload
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-prime [source] (artful-proposed) [0.8.5]
[09:34] <tseliot> thanks
[09:34] <apw> tseliot, ^
[09:35] <apw> bdmurray, update-manager ... that introduces a new untranslated string, are we sure we want to do that right now ?
[09:39] <sil2100> apw: I saw an e-mail from Brian about that, didn't see any translators replying though
[09:44] <jibel> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-translators/2017-October/007414.html no one replied
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-1.9 (artful-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-2 => 1.9.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-1.9 [source] (artful-proposed) [1.9.1-2ubuntu1]
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-prime (artful-proposed/main) [0.8.4 => 0.8.5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:59] <tseliot> apw: I still had to keep "--with python3". I also opted for compat 9, so that I can backport it to Xenial. You should be able to see the new upload in the queue
[10:00] <apw> tseliot, ok
[10:09] <apw> tseliot, is there any reason that is >= 9.0.0 rather than >= 9
[10:09] <tseliot> apw: it was there before, I simply replaced one digit
[10:10] <tseliot> so, no
[10:10]  * apw looks why that might be
[10:11] <apw> it does seem to be at odds with the norm for sure
[10:11] <apw> but it sorts ok in xenial by luck, so perhaps i don't care
[10:19] <tseliot> apw: it shouldn't really change anything. It's kind of useless in this case, as I'm not depending on, say, >= 9.0.2
[10:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-prime [source] (artful-proposed) [0.8.5]
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-settings [source] (artful-proposed) [384.69-0ubuntu1]
[10:20] <apw> tseliot, indeed ^ ... fix it for the next one
[10:20] <tseliot> apw: I will, thanks
[10:20] <tseliot> apw: while you're at it, are you going to approve nvidia-settings too?
[10:20]  * apw hates on sync some more
[10:21] <apw> tseliot, ^
[10:22] <tseliot> apw: it's just a new upstream release, to go with the new nvidia driver. I only had to refresh one patch with a couple of minimal changes.
[10:23] <apw> tseliot, ^ i accepted them both together
[10:23] <apw> tseliot, at least for me i have queuebot accept announcements for them both about 8 lines back
[10:23] <tseliot> apw: sorry, I'm not sure how I didn't see that
[10:24] <apw> tseliot, it is called confirmation-bias ... we see what we expect to see
[10:25] <tseliot> apw: I call it sleep deprivation. Potato potahto :P
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, your jpeg change broke badly dcm2nixx
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/340332056/buildlog_ubuntu-artful-amd64.dcm2niix_1.0.20170923-1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> dpkg: error processing archive /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-5dOQMo/49-libturbojpeg0-dev_1.5.2-0ubuntu3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg>  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libturbojpeg.a', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo8-dev:amd64 1.5.2-0ubuntu3
[10:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (artful-proposed) [2:1.19.4-1ubuntu1]
[10:37] <ddstreet> xnox you've done some of the last few mdadm changes, can you review/sponsor lp #1617919 if you have time
[10:45] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: of course "badly", whatever ...
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (artful-proposed/main) [0.97ubuntu2 => 0.98ubuntu1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:46] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, how to fix? what is your plan?
[10:53] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: ship that turbojpeg crap in the turbo specifc package
[10:55] <LocutusOfBorg> :( ok
[10:56] <LocutusOfBorg> basically return to the ubuntu2 package?
[10:57] <doko> no
[11:01] <LocutusOfBorg> can you please do it? I'm lost and I don't want to make things go again in main
[11:14] <xnox> ddstreet, sure
[11:14] <xnox> ddstreet, i am preparing a xenial sru as we speak, and i can include that bugfix too
[11:14] <ddstreet> xnox thanks!
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.470 => 2.471] (desktop-core)
[12:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-0ubuntu1 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (xenial-proposed/main) [2.408.18 => 2.408.20] (desktop-core)
[13:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-6 (artful-proposed/main) [6.4.0-7ubuntu1 => 6.4.0-8ubuntu1] (core)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mdadm (xenial-proposed/main) [3.3-2ubuntu7.4 => 3.3-2ubuntu7.5] (core)
[13:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity-settings-daemon [sync] (artful-proposed) [15.04.1+17.10.20171003-0ubuntu1]
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu (artful-proposed/main) [131 => 132] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clutter-gtk (artful-proposed/main) [1.8.4-1 => 1.8.4-2] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu [source] (artful-proposed) [132]
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (artful-proposed) [2.471]
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nodejs [source] (artful-proposed) [6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-photos [sync] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-1]
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vala [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.36.6-1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-gpu-tools [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.20-1]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdrm (xenial-proposed/main) [2.4.76-1~ubuntu16.04.1 => 2.4.83-1~16.04.1] (core, xorg)
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bubblewrap [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[14:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wayland-protocols (xenial-proposed/universe) [1.1-2 => 1.10-1~16.04.1] (no packageset)
[14:38] <tjaalton> so, with powerpc dropped, would it be ok to leave it's mesa/llvm at the zesty versions for 16.04.4 because llvm-5 doesn't build on xenial?
[14:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [source] (artful-proposed) [0.98ubuntu1]
[14:42] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, why llvm-5 doesn't build on xenial?
[14:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-6 [source] (artful-proposed) [6.4.0-8ubuntu1]
[14:44] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/340258360/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-powerpc.llvm-toolchain-5.0_1%3A5.0-2ubuntu1~16.04.0_BUILDING.txt.gz
[14:45] <tjaalton> if you can fix it then great :)
[14:45] <tjaalton> or have ideas
[14:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clutter-gtk [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.8.4-2]
[14:47] <tjaalton> I could try with -3
[14:52] <bdmurray> apw: Yes, I am.
[14:54] <apw> bdmurray, yeah sil2100 pointed me at an email thread you started, are we waiting on that or are you actually
[14:54] <apw> bdmurray, saying the before change message was all shiney and new and not well translated either, so updating
[14:54] <apw> bdmurray, it doesn't reduce its quality
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, debian/libturbojpeg.install:usr/lib/*/libturbojpeg.so.0*
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> debian/libjpeg-turbo8-dev.install:usr/lib/*/libturbojpeg.a
[14:55] <LocutusOfBorg> who should ship that .a file? this is actually the issue, it is ship in turbo8-dev and turbojpeg-dev
[14:55] <bdmurray> apw: I'm not waiting on a response to that and it was not well translated either.
[14:55] <apw> bdmurray, ok so your recommendation would be to let it go, i am leaning there too
[14:56] <bdmurray> apw: Yes, I think helping people free space in /boot is important enough to do this now.
[14:56] <apw> bdmurray, okies, based on that discussion i will accept it
[14:57] <bdmurray> apw: Thanks, maybe you could also look at ubuntu-release-upgrader? Its essentially the same since it came out of update-manager so many years ago.
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/310735908/llvm-toolchain-4.0_1%3A4.0-1_1%3A4.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz enjoy
[14:58] <apw> bdmurray, where is that hiding ...
[14:58] <LocutusOfBorg> we dropped that patch when powerpc has been dropped
[14:58] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: ahh...
[14:58] <tjaalton> good catch
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (artful-proposed) [1:17.10.11]
[14:59] <bdmurray> apw: Ah, sorry it already got accepted. Still catching up.
[14:59] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: bring it back ;) Can drop after BB is released
[14:59] <apw> bdmurray, ahh ok good
[15:00] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: alternatively remind me in 6mo :)
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (artful-proposed) [3.26.1-0ubuntu2]
[15:05] <elopio> bdmurray: do you know if there's a way to run autopkgtest every time a PPA is updated?
[15:06] <bdmurray> elopio: I do not know.
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uvp-monitor [source] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1]
[15:08] <elopio> maybe cjwatson ^ ?
[15:08] <apw> elopio, there is not currently ... it is something we have been thinking about but have no firm plans or scheme for it
[15:08] <apw> elopio, personally i track missing tests for PPAs a care about and fire them off manually, likley that does not
[15:09] <apw> elopio, solve the problem you are trying to solve
[15:10] <elopio> apw: I can fire them manually if they run in the launchpad arm runners, but don't know how.
[15:10] <elopio> Do you have docs for that?
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uvp-monitor [amd64] (artful-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uvp-monitor [armhf] (artful-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uvp-monitor [arm64] (artful-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uvp-monitor [i386] (artful-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:11] <cjwatson> elopio: I don't have much experience with the autopkgtest runners.  They run on scalingstack, so share infrastructure with the Launchpad build farm, but they aren't part of Launchpad.
[15:15] <LocutusOfBorg> elopio, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration/AutopkgtestInfrastructure
[15:16] <LocutusOfBorg> can't you just do the corresponding query?
[15:17] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: looks like most of the patch is there, just not the part about powerpc
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/locutusofborg-ppa/+sourcepub/8351454/+listing-archive-extra copy into your ppa, so it won't get lost
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if it works
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> well, I think somebody fixed the powerpc toolchain in the meanwhile
[15:18] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: I'm almost done with the update, will push it there
[15:20] <elopio> LocutusOfBorg: let me check that. I remember having problems with the trigger field, but maybe I was doing it wrong. If I can do the request with any SSO account that will work nicely, I think.
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uvp-monitor [amd64] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uvp-monitor [armhf] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uvp-monitor [arm64] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted uvp-monitor [i386] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>5-0ubuntu1]
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/request.cgi?release=artful&arch=XXXXX&package=YYYY&ppa=FOO/BAR&trigger=PACKAGE/VERSION
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> elopio, ^^^
[15:22] <LocutusOfBorg> you need to have upload permissions in the archive for YYYY
[15:23] <LocutusOfBorg> tjaalton, just to make you aware, I won't remember you anything in 6mo :) I will forget all this stuff in a matter of seconds, while deleting it from my pppa
[15:24] <tjaalton> LocutusOfBorg: hehe, fair enough
[15:24] <LocutusOfBorg> :)
[15:25] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll probably remember that fuzzer thing
[15:29] <elopio> LocutusOfBorg: oh, upload permissions will probably be a problem. Can I get permissions just for snapcraft easily? Or do I have to follow the process to become an Ubuntu-Dev?
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libjpeg-turbo (artful-proposed/main) [1.5.2-0ubuntu3 => 1.5.2-0ubuntu4] (core)
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> elopio, I can click something for you
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> PPU is what you are searching (per package uploads)
[15:30] <nacc> elopio: that's PPU, iirc (per package upload)
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, ^^ libjpeg-turbo is fixed
[15:30] <LocutusOfBorg> not sure if it makes happy your main VS universe war
[15:31] <elopio> 😃
[15:31] <elopio> Please, click!
[15:31] <LocutusOfBorg> where?
[15:38] <elopio> Nevermind. I thought you meant you could click something to make me a snapcraft ppu. I'm reading the wiki now, I'll apply to the next meeting of the board.
[16:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted calc-stats [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.5-0ubuntu1]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libjpeg-turbo [source] (artful-proposed) [1.5.2-0ubuntu4]
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libseccomp (xenial-proposed/main) [2.2.3-3ubuntu3 => 2.3.1-2.1ubuntu2~16.04.1] (core)
[16:25] <xnox> tyhicks, ^
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (artful-proposed/universe) [1.50 => 1.51] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (artful-proposed) [1.51]
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: poppler (artful-proposed/main) [0.57.0-2ubuntu3 => 0.57.0-2ubuntu4] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[17:31] <LocutusOfBorg> elopio, you can give me an autopkgtest specific failure to trigger, but I can't make you a PPU
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: guzzle-sphinx-theme (artful-proposed/universe) [0.7.11-1 => 0.7.11-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libb2 (artful-proposed/universe) [0.97-3 => 0.97-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted guzzle-sphinx-theme [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.7.11-2]
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libb2 [sync] (artful-proposed) [0.97-4]
[17:36] <elopio> LocutusOfBorg: yes, I got that now. It's not very useful to ask you to run them for me, because this needs to happen daily.
[17:37] <elopio> I can currently trigger the tests, but only if there is an associated github PR. I made a crazy script that makes a PR just to get the daily execution of autopkgtests, but it's now a little too crazy for me, not easy to understand and hard to keep track of the results.
[17:37] <elopio> I'm looking for an alternative.
[17:38] <LocutusOfBorg> PPU
[17:38] <elopio> the PPU sounds ok, but I would have to give my credentials to the bot, or do it manually when I wake up. I will apply anyway, because it will be useful in the future.
[17:39] <elopio> but, I think that the perfect solution is an automatic execution every time the PPA changes. We have the daily recipe there, sync with the github branch, it will just be magic :)
[17:39] <elopio> I could just use the bot to poll the results every day, and notify about problems.
[17:39] <LocutusOfBorg> nope
[17:40] <LocutusOfBorg> you have to do your cookie to the bot
[17:40] <LocutusOfBorg> and once a month it will need a renewal
[17:40] <LocutusOfBorg> (me never checked if the cookie is autopkgtest specific or not)
[17:41] <elopio> ok, I will prepare my application, and when I'm PPU I'll bother you to review my script :) In the mean time, I think I can make the github crazy script less weird.
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gcc-5 (artful-proposed/main) [5.4.1-13ubuntu1 => 5.5.0-1ubuntu1] (core)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gcc-5 [source] (artful-proposed) [5.5.0-1ubuntu1]
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poppler [source] (artful-proposed) [0.57.0-2ubuntu4]
[18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (trusty-proposed/universe) [2.27.6~14.04 => 2.28.2~14.04] (no packageset)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (artful-proposed/main) [2.27.6+17.10 => 2.28.2+17.10] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (zesty-proposed/main) [2.27.6+17.04 => 2.28.2+17.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.27.6 => 2.28.2] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[18:51] <tyhicks> xnox: thanks! lets coordinate on testing when the time comes
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: p4est (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted p4est [sync] (artful-proposed) [1.1-5]
[20:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (artful-proposed/main) [17.1-17-g45d361cb-0ubuntu1 => 17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (xenial-proposed/main) [0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~16.04.2 => 17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~16.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (zesty-proposed/main) [0.7.9-233-ge586fe35-0ubuntu1~17.04.2 => 17.1-18-gd4f70470-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xfce4-weather-plugin (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.9-1 => 0.8.9-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.0-0ubuntu3 => 3.26.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-docs (artful-proposed/main) [17.10.6 => 17.10.7] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mutter (artful-proposed/main) [3.26.1-1 => 3.26.1-2] (desktop-extra, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (artful-proposed/main) [2.471 => 2.472] (desktop-core)
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (artful-proposed) [2.472]


[00:32] <neilv> hello. any idea how long it'll take for an ubuntu-specific DoS exploit in apache to become a security update?
[04:18] <reduz> Hi! Pulseaudio is a bug, can it be fixed (removed) from ubuntu?
[06:33] <Hew> bug 325973 still exists with Karmic, should it be reopened or reported as a new bug?
[06:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 325973 in nautilus "gnome-session keeps respawning nautilus when no desktop is drawed" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/325973
[06:43] <Hew> I'll reopen it.
[07:24] <Hew> The trace for bug 386357 / gnome bug 585595 is complete, isn't it? I don't understand why upstream is asking for glibc symbols, or which package these symbols are contained in.
[07:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 386357 in rhythmbox "rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386357
[07:24] <ubot4> Gnome bug 585595 in general "rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in pthread_mutex_lock()" [Critical,Needinfo] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585595
[07:31] <jmarsden> Hew: The symbols being requested are most likely in the libc6-dbg package.
[07:32] <Hew> Thanks jmarsden. I already have that installed and I assume the apport retracer uses them too, so I'm still not sure what upstream needs.
[07:33] <jmarsden> Hew: OK... sounds like you should ask them, perhaps in a comment on the upstream bug?
[07:33] <Hew> ok, will do
[11:33] <BUGabundo> bom dia ppl
[15:11] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Hi, I have a bug in karmic which is fixed upstream in mesa: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22428 can someone help me understanding if the fix will naturally reach karmic or I should report it?
[15:11] <ubot4> Freedesktop bug 22428 in Drivers/DRI/i915 "[bisected 945GME]mesa xdemo/glxcontexts run aborted with error: Assertion `!obj->Pointer'" [Major,Verified: fixed]
[15:12] <Le-Chuck_ITA> dunque
[15:12] <Le-Chuck_ITA> pomplamoose video song
[15:12] <Le-Chuck_ITA> cerca su youtube
[15:12] <Le-Chuck_ITA> sorry
[15:12] <Le-Chuck_ITA> wrong window...
[15:12] <BUGabundo> ahaahahah
[15:13] <Le-Chuck_ITA> Luckily it was a polite conversation :)
[15:21] <Le-Chuck_ITA> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/395522
[15:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395522 in mesa "mesa xdemo/glxcontexts run aborted with assertion error" [Undecided,New]
[15:33] <BUGabundo> hey kklimonda
[15:33] <BUGabundo> humm on mobile *again* kklimonda|W810
[15:52] <kklimonda|W810> hey
[16:07] <BUGabundo> stupid question: where do I file firefox 3.6 bugs?? lp on ubuntu won't allow me :(
[16:20] <BUGabundo> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395534 I have no idea which package/project set it too
[16:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 395534 in ubuntu "firefox will not come out of full screen" [Undecided,New]
[17:40] <cactaur> Hey guys! I have a question. If a bug is linked upstream, but the upstream bug was found as a duplicate, should I update the launchpad bug to point to the other bug?
[17:42] <BUGabundo> good question!
[17:42] <BUGabundo> doenst LP know about it ?
[17:44] <cactaur> Umm.... according to LP, the bug is marked as invalid, but upstream it was just marked as a duplicate.
[17:44] <cactaur> And I was actually looking at your FF bug <.<
[17:45] <cactaur> It was missing a package.
[17:47] <BUGabundo> mine?
[17:47]  * BUGabundo hides
[17:47] <BUGabundo> lolol
[17:47] <BUGabundo> right upstream marked it as dupe!
[17:47] <BUGabundo> and LP closed it?? bad LP
[17:47] <BUGabundo> let me file a bug on it! LOL
[17:48] <cactaur> Well, LP saw it upstream as invalid.
[17:48] <cactaur> On Ubuntu, there's been nothing done.
[17:48] <BUGabundo> yeah... that..
[17:49] <BUGabundo> I don't know where to file Firefox 3.6
[17:49] <BUGabundo> its not in Ubuntu Archives
[17:49] <BUGabundo> and I don't file a team BTS for it
[17:49] <BUGabundo> fta and asac are away right now
[19:27] <hggdh> cactaur, go ahead an update the LP upstream link
[19:31] <hggdh> hey BUGabundo
[19:31] <BUGabundo> hey hggdh desparecido !
[19:31] <BUGabundo> hggdh: cactaur: I already did
[19:32] <BUGabundo> hggdh: shouldn't be LP doing so?
[19:34] <hggdh> Well, the bug was closed invalid upstream...
[19:34] <hggdh> (as a dup)
[19:35] <bcurtiswx> hey BUGabundo, hggdh
[19:35] <BUGabundo> hggdh: but the nondupe was NEW
[19:35] <BUGabundo> bad BTS ?
[19:35] <hggdh> hi bcurtiswx
[19:36] <hggdh> BUGabundo, I am not sure. All I know is this is how it has always been, AFAICR
[19:36] <BUGabundo> ok ok
[19:38] <bcurtiswx> i recommend to everyone here, the mini and karmic are a bad mix at the moment
[19:41] <BUGabundo> mini?
[19:41] <BUGabundo> hey chrisccoulson
[19:41] <chrisccoulson> hi BUGabundo
[19:41] <bcurtiswx> BUGabundo: dell mini 90
[19:41] <bcurtiswx> 9*
[19:41] <BUGabundo> ahhhh
[19:42] <BUGabundo> what's broken other then the usual bcurtiswx?
[19:42] <bcurtiswx> the intel driver makes the screen go to random colors at random times
[19:42] <bcurtiswx> i try to reproduce it and its not possible
[19:42] <bcurtiswx> lol
[19:42] <bcurtiswx> its that random
[19:43] <BUGabundo> ahah
[19:43] <BUGabundo> tried x-edger driver?
[19:43] <bcurtiswx> yea
[19:43] <bcurtiswx> no help
[19:44] <bcurtiswx> ive got a bug for it.. but bryce knows about it, so for now its out of my hands
[19:49] <elena09> hello
[19:51] <BUGabundo> nixternal: ping
[19:51] <BUGabundo> (07:38:54 PM) bcurtiswx: i recommend to everyone here, the mini and karmic are a bad mix at the moment
[19:52] <nixternal> yo
[19:52] <BUGabundo> (07:42:55 PM) bcurtiswx: the intel driver makes the screen go to random colors at random times
[19:52] <nixternal> oh, I don't even get that far
[19:52] <BUGabundo> hello elena09. welcome back due
[19:52] <nixternal> I can't even get to KDM
[19:52] <BUGabundo> *dude
[19:52] <BUGabundo> nixternal: aaah
[19:52] <bcurtiswx> lol
[19:52] <BUGabundo> back to +1
[19:52] <BUGabundo> bcurtiswx: you should be there too
[19:53] <nixternal> bcurtiswx: did you have to do anything funky to get X at least working somewhat?
[19:53] <bcurtiswx> no, it was so bad i went back to jaunty :-X
[19:54] <elena09> I set acpi=off at boot starting, and the temperature of my hard disk is 52 Celsius degrees
[19:55] <nixternal> heh, I need Karmic so I can work on the Kubuntu Netbook Edition
[19:55]  * BUGabundo pulls bcurtiswx ear and drag him to #ubuntu+1
[19:55] <bcurtiswx> hey now, no ear dragging allowed
[19:55]  * ogra throws little wet sticky paperballs at nixternal
[19:56] <bcurtiswx> this channels turning into a high school.. bugs the principal pulling ears and ogras the bully shooting spitballs
[19:56] <ogra> nixternal, hey, happy 4th
[19:56] <BUGabundo> hey ogra long time no see
[19:56] <BUGabundo> bcurtiswx: ahaahaha
[19:57] <BUGabundo> Approved Seal of ReDent
[19:57] <ogra> BUGabundo, well, i'm always around just not always active in here
[19:57] <BUGabundo> ogra: yeah I know! you been uber busy too
[19:58]  * bcurtiswx waves to ogra,
[19:58] <bcurtiswx> nice to meet you
[19:58] <ogra> yeah, working on ARM enablement keeps me busy
[19:58] <nixternal> ogra: thanks :)
[20:01] <nixternal> nomodeset :)  that is my friend of late
[20:03] <elena09> http://forum.ts.fujitsu.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=94&t=39835 that is a bad BUG!!
[20:04] <elena09> and no one knows how to solve it ; see also: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acpi-support/+bug/374121
[20:04] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 374121 in acpi-support "acpi-support 0.121 causes ~+10c increase in HD temp." [Undecided,Triaged]
[20:07] <ogra> well, slangasek seems to know about it ...he apparently commented
[20:07] <ogra> and gave an accurate explanation
[20:09] <elena09> but he didn't give a solution; I have 53 Celsius degrees Celsius now, and only Pidgin is running and Firefox. And AC adapter is unplugged
[20:09] <ogra> read what he wrote
[20:09] <ogra> there is no solution
[20:10] <elena09> I read it
[20:10] <ogra> yu either have excessive park cycles or the tem raises
[20:10] <ogra> *temp
[20:11] <elena09> yes
[20:11] <ogra> /etc/acpi/start.d/90-hdparm.sh rules that, you could edit that
[20:11] <ogra> and go with the excessive parking all the time instaed
[20:11] <elena09> Now laptp is on batery only, acpi=off, no parkings anymore, but 53 Celsius
[20:12] <ogra> (note that until recently all distros had that excessive parking on by default since its a HW vendor setting, i havent seen dead disks up to today due to it)
[20:12] <elena09> excessive parkings destroy HDD very fast
[20:12] <ogra> it doeesnt
[20:13] <ogra> it lowers the lifecycle
[20:13] <ogra> but you wont use the disk long enough to notice unless you actually use a laptop for more than 10 years
[20:14] <elena09> so, you say that excessive parking is better than excessive heat?
[20:14] <ogra> your choice
[20:14] <elena09> the clicks of parking are annoying...
[20:14] <ogra> users complained a lot that we didnt do anything against the excessive parking due to the FUD that came up
[20:15] <elena09> FUD?
[20:15] <ogra> so now the parking is handled
[20:15] <ogra> yes, FUD
[20:15] <elena09> what'sFUD?
[20:15] <ogra> its true it lowers the lifetime of a disk
[20:15] <ogra> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt
[20:15] <elena09> ok
[20:16] <ogra> but its not as dramatic as it is outlined by many people
[20:16] <elena09> like this one: http://paul.luon.net/journal/hacking/BrokenHDDs.html ?
[20:16] <ogra> you can compare it to waering out a USB key ... theoretically these have a limited amount of write cycles
[20:17] <ogra> i have USB keys to which i do a test install once a day ... including a swap partition which is proven to do horrible amounts of writes to the key ...
[20:18] <ogra> my oldest is a 4 years 2G key old and still doesnt show any corruption
[20:19] <elena09> ok thanks, I must leave now
[20:19] <ogra> you could try experimenting with hdparm a bit
[20:19] <ogra> to find a roper compromise between heat and parking
[20:20] <ogra> *proper
[20:20] <ogra> the prob is that its really specific to certain disks ... which is why the setting wasnt touched for so long ... such problems were predictable ... there is no common setting that works for everyones HW
[20:53] <BUGabundo> ogra: I have a 8GiB kingston with one year and its seems to have lots of trouble being read!
[21:05] <billybigrigger> hey everyone
[21:06] <billybigrigger> is there anything i can do to get vbox 2.24 working with the new kernel 2.6.31?
[21:06] <BUGabundo> hummm
[21:06] <billybigrigger> or how long do i have to wait to see vbox 3.0 in the karmic repos?
[21:06] <BUGabundo> I was going to tell you something
[21:06] <BUGabundo> ahh audio
[21:06] <BUGabundo> open pavucontrol
[21:06] <billybigrigger> yeah
[21:06] <BUGabundo> and UP the levers
[21:06] <billybigrigger> all seemed good in there
[21:06] <billybigrigger> tried maxing everything
[21:06] <billybigrigger> working now after a restart
[21:07] <BUGabundo> one must have got down, due to overbusted sound
[21:07] <BUGabundo> ah ok
[21:07] <BUGabundo> billybigrigger: its not static levers! it's the ones of apps playing
[21:07] <BUGabundo> those only appear when playing
[21:07] <billybigrigger> yeah
[21:07] <billybigrigger> i was trying to play with the vlc one
[21:07] <BUGabundo> which sucks for stuff that only works for half a sec
[21:07] <billybigrigger> i have sound in flash again for some reason
[21:07] <billybigrigger> haha
[21:08] <BUGabundo> oopps wrong #
[21:08] <BUGabundo> vlc as no sound for me :(
[21:08] <BUGabundo> it hasn't all karmic cycle
[21:08] <billybigrigger> well i did have sound today, not now after the restart
[21:08] <billybigrigger> really?
[21:08] <billybigrigger> still
[21:08] <billybigrigger> wow
[21:09] <BUGabundo> yeah


[01:42] <darthvader_> Hello
[01:42] <tonyyarusso> hey
[01:43] <darthvader_> What's up?
[01:44] <tonyyarusso> Not a whole lot at the moment.
[01:45] <darthvader_> What OS are you running currently?
[01:45] <tonyyarusso> Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat, and Windows.
[01:46] <darthvader_> How is Red Hat?
[01:47] <tonyyarusso> Gets the job done.  Kind of a vague question.
[01:48] <darthvader_> Sorry, I've never used it. I'm relatively new to linux in general
[01:49] <tonyyarusso> Different package manager is the primary difference.
[01:53] <darthvader_> What is it you do?
[01:55] <tonyyarusso> I'm a sysadmin for the state
[01:59] <darthvader_> That's similar to what i want to do. I'm in college right now studying computer science. Could you give me any advice?
[02:02] <tonyyarusso> Play around with stuff at home, get your foot in the door somewhere that will actually be useful long-term on the resume.
[02:02] <tonyyarusso> I did a student worker position in college that worked out nicely.
[02:06] <darthvader_> Thanks, I appreciate it. I'd like to end up in infosec eventually