[06:06] <adrian_1908> Hello. I'm still (falsely) banned in #ubuntu. Could someone please look into it.
[06:29] <el> adrian_1908: i'm not seeing what would be keeping you out. what's the actual error you're getting?
[06:30] <adrian_1908> el: On join attempt, I get "Cannot join #ubuntu (You are banned)."
[06:30] <adrian_1908> Since 2 days, happened while I wasn't online it seems.
[06:31] <el> did you try join it again since i spoke?
[06:31] <adrian_1908> yes, just tried.
[06:34] <adrian_1908> If I knew the reason maybe I could do something about it. I recalled saying something about everyone idling except those spammers, but surely that wasn't a banable offense. I've been on the channel for ages.
[06:34] <adrian_1908> So I wonder if it's some mistake, technical or personal.
[06:35] <el> it's possibly by your ip, and you're cloaked
[06:36] <Flannel> adrian_1908: We're not seeing anything.    Do you mind telling us your host-prior-to-cloak so we can look at those to figure out which ban it is?
[06:37] <adrian_1908> el: yeah, thinking it might be ip. Would have happened in light of the recent spam attacks then, same VPN maybe.
[06:37] <el> very likely then
[06:37] <el> can you try a different address? if we've banned the vpn address it is possibly for good reason
[06:37] <adrian_1908> Flannel: pardon, how do I find that host-prior-to-cloak value?
[06:38] <el> adrian_1908: you should see it in your /whois
[06:38] <adrian_1908> yeah, I'll try a different ip. I tend to stick to one for long time usually, but i'll pick another one to test.
[06:38] <el> and which vpn might i ask?
[06:39] <adrian_1908> Mullvad
[06:40] <el> we can check and remove the ban now if you can tell us what ip is in /whois adrian_1908
[06:41] <adrian_1908> seems to be ipv6: 2a02:20c8:4124::7d   the ipv4 range (that I can keep in my head) is <IP_ADDRESS>-17
[06:43] <el> adrian_1908: try join again please?
[06:43] <adrian_1908> btw, not sure if it's problem, but I suspect the last part changes as I reconnect. it might not be ::7d but e.g. ::3d or ::5d at times iirc.
[06:43] <adrian_1908> yup, that works.
[06:44] <el> if it happens again then someone naughty likes your regular exit and you should try again :)
[06:44] <adrian_1908> hehe, yeah. well, thanks for the help!
[06:45] <el> np
[11:13] <leftyfb> Can we please remove bugzbunny20 again? He's begging to be banned again.


[08:02] <lordievader> Good morning.
[12:25] <BluesKaj> Howdy all
[14:46] <fffax> If UID matches, PROC is a direct child and ptrace_scope = 1 (https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/security/Yama.txt), what could be the reason for "Operation not permitted", when I try to attach to PROC?
[19:39] <clevrpwn> anyone else having problems with the repositories being unresponsive or just me?
[19:40] <genii> They are responding fine here (Toronto)
[19:41] <genii> clevrpwn: Are you using a localized archive like zz.archive.ubuntu.com or the main one of archive.ubuntu.com ?
[19:42] <genii> ( where zz is a country code)
[19:42] <clevrpwn> genii I'm in SLC so just archive.ubuntu.com
[19:43] <genii> Hm. Well, works fine from here.
[19:44] <clevrpwn> genii may just be the university but I wanted to check if it was just me or everyone
[19:53] <clevrpwn> seems it was the univerity their automated system flagged it for suspicious trafic last night while I was working on a project. all cleared now though
[19:53] <genii> Cool.


[01:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-gonum-v1-plot [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:07] <cpaelzer> vorlon: you are right "Fix committed" (once it shows up in component-mismatch), but in the past it often seemed promotions needed pings to happen - so I thought it might be helpful to subscribe ubuntu-archive (not for the process, but for the purpose of the bug update being seen by the right people)
[05:08] <cpaelzer> in any case - thank you for picking it up and doing the AA work on this bug.
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: chirp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1:20200227+py3+20200213-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: emacs-websocket [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.12+18.g5aaf9d1-2] (no packageset)
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.2.89-4] (no packageset)
[07:43] <xnox> vorlon:  s390-sysconfig-writer wants to pull s390-tools-udeb back into main.... But i am failing to see why s390-sysconfig-writer is in main!
[08:15] <Laney> vorlon: I'll have a look, might not be today though
[08:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.7]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rsyslog [source] (focal-proposed) [8.2001.0-1ubuntu1.1]
[08:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted probert [source] (focal-proposed) [0.0.18build1]
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/multiverse) [10.2.89-4] (no packageset)
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted irssi [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-1ubuntu1.1]
[09:26] <Laney> vorlon: ah, ok, fixed I think
[09:26] <Laney> We were doing:
[09:26] <Laney>  - read sources from release
[09:26] <Laney>  - read binaries from release
[09:26] <Laney>  - read sources from proposed
[09:26] <Laney>  - read binaries from proposed
[09:26] <Laney>   - merge {release, proposed} sources
[09:26] <Laney>  - merge {release, proposed} binaries
[09:27] <Laney> but that means that binary only migrations had no source to be associated with when they were read in, because the source is in release
[09:28] <Laney> need to read all sources, merge them, then read binaries, then merge those
[09:30] <juliank> ubuntu-archive grub2 in groovy unapproved needs approving :)
[09:32] <juliank> [due to amd64, arm64 signed binary stuff]
[09:33] <juliank> And I guess someone wants to delete the old 26.1 stuff that's in there too
[09:39] <apw> juliank, the changelog delta is rather concerning ... seems to remove the word SECURITY a lot
[09:39] <juliank> apw: it does?
[09:40] <juliank> apw: I took the git branch for the focal security upload and rebased my stuff on top of it, is the tarball different?
[09:40] <juliank> that would suck
[09:40] <juliank> chrisccoulson, xnox ^
[09:40] <apw> juliank, it may be launchpad diff as much as anything
[09:42] <juliank> can confirm
[09:42] <juliank> ugh
[09:42] <juliank> wth
[09:43] <apw> juliank, so the code delta is looking ok, just changelog is a mushfest
[09:43] <juliank> not sure if there's a difference outside changelog
[09:43] <chrisccoulson> juliank, aha, I think this came up last week - the git branch I pushed didn't quite match what I'd uploaded because I didn't commit the last minute changes I made to the changelog
[09:44] <chrisccoulson> (which added all of the CVE references)
[09:44] <juliank> ack
[09:44] <juliank> I confirmed that it's only changelog differences
[09:45] <juliank> Using git-ubuntu's focal-security branch and diffing against the focal branch
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:78.1.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[09:46] <juliank> apw: I think it's a bit pointless waste of resources to re-upload with the changelog fixes, and I'll merge the proper changelog back in git, and do that in the focal SRU
[09:46] <apw> juliank, ack
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpcbind [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.3-0.6ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.30]
[09:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: sane-airscan (groovy-proposed/primary) [0.99.12-1ubuntu1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu27]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu27]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stress-ng [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.05.23-1ubuntu4]
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-cuda-toolkit [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [10.2.89-4]
[10:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-cuda-toolkit [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [10.2.89-4]
[10:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted emacs-websocket [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.12+18.g5aaf9d1-2]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted chirp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1:20200227+py3+20200213-1]
[10:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-gonum-v1-plot [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.7.0-2]
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:78.1.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Bionic 18.04.5] (20101020ubuntu543.17) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Xenial 16.04.7] (20101020ubuntu451.29) has been added
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-gcp-5.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1 => 5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-gcp-5.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1 => 5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-oracle-5.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1 => 5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-signed-oracle-5.4 (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1 => 5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp-5.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-gcp-5.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-oracle-5.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-oracle-5.4 [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1021.21~18.04.1]
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (focal-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2] (core) (sync)
[11:33]  * juliank is preparing SRUs for shim for post point-release and uploading/copy-packaging them to proposed queues
[11:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (bionic-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2] (core) (sync)
[11:35] <juliank> oops, those should be binary copies
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (focal-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2] (core) (sync)
[11:36] <juliank> shims are hard
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (bionic-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2] (core) (sync)
[11:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim (xenial-proposed/main) [15+1533136590.3beb971-0ubuntu1 => 15+1552672080.a4a1fbe-0ubuntu2] (core) (sync)
[11:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.40.3 => 1.40.4] (core)
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: umockdev (focal-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-1 => 0.14.1-1ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (focal-proposed/main) [1.40.3 => 1.40.4] (core)
[11:57] <juliank> (ubuntu-release: please reject old shim-signed/focal, it did not include a LP: bug reference)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: umockdev (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-1 => 0.11.1-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (bionic-proposed/main) [1.37~18.04.6 => 1.37~18.04.7] (core)
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: shim-signed (xenial-proposed/main) [1.33.1~16.04.5 => 1.33.1~16.04.6] (core)
[12:36] <marcustomlinson> tjaalton: hi, could you please have a look at LibreOffice in the Focal queue? It's actually been reviewed and approved before but had an issue with orig mismatches
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.3.0-1033.35] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1035.36] (no packageset)
[13:25] <xnox> bdmurray:  sil2100: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1890797 was just reported to me. I have now pushed
[13:25] <xnox> https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/commit/?id=bbc8d8b92b14cdb9f4dd502d728803e14fb02d9e
[13:25] <xnox> to fix this
[13:26] <xnox> bdmurray:  sil2100: but it means bionic d-i server needs respin
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chromium-browser (focal-proposed/universe) [84.0.4147.89-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 84.0.4147.105-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1035.36]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-5.3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-1033.35]
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:78.1.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:78.1.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:03] <sil2100> xnox: eek
[15:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: telegraf (groovy-proposed/primary) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1]
[15:13] <sergiodj> vorlon: new telegraf has been uploaded (thanks to kanashiro)
[15:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: thunderbird [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [1:78.1.1+build1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[15:47] <marcustomlinson> tjaalton: hey thanks for approving LO for focal today. Any idea why it's stuck though? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=libreoffice
[16:06] <Laney> (taken up in #launchpad)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (focal-proposed) [1:6.4.5-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:10] <Laney> (and accepted, I did it myself based on tjaalton having previously tried to do it)
[16:11] <Laney> (spank me if you feel the need)
[16:57] <ginggs> ubuntu-archive: would someone please RM pyhst2's binaries on ppc64el in release?
[16:57] <ginggs> it no longer builds there since the nvidia ppc64el drivers were dropped https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server/418.152.00-0ubuntu1
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pixelmed-codec [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [20200328-2] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[17:40] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: No clue what's going on with zita-ajbridge being stuck in focal-proposed from SRU bug 1889146. It has been over 7 days (and not a Mon-Thurs thing in this case) and there's nothing in excuses.
[17:50] <Eickmeyer> tjaalton, vorlon, sil2100 ^ (this is rather urgent as it's causing stuff to hang)
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bcache-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.8-2build1 => 1.0.8-2ubuntu0.1] (edubuntu, kubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: flint [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[22:49] <vorlon> cpaelzer: so fwiw I do not read bug mail for ubuntu-archive, and only noticed this was ready to go because I happened to be reading through ubuntu-archive-subscribed bugs for package removals.  The 'fix committed' would've been a smoother workflow for me
[22:49] <vorlon> xnox: s390-sysconfig-writer> well, let's just demote that too and see what happens
[22:52] <vorlon> ginggs: I don't understand the pyhst2 build failure; it clearly succeeds at installing nvidia-cuda-toolkit before failing to find -lcuda at build time
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-solid-rest [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.7-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [i386] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist)
[23:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: spoa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist)
[23:43] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: zita-ajbridge> you know this week was focal .1 release, right?  So promotions from -proposed to -updates were frozen in order to not derail the ISO mastering.  If this was something that you felt should have gone into the .1 media, you would've needed to communicate it directly to the release team in time for inclusion.  But at this point it will need to wait until Monday
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-5]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [i386] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-5]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpc [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.0+dfsg-5]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-solid-rest [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.7-2]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-2]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted flint [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.6.2-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pixelmed-codec [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [20200328-2]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted spoa [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[23:46] <vorlon> xnox: answer: linux-5.7 is building di packages which depend on s390-dasd and friedns
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpc [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.2.0+dfsg-5] (i386-whitelist)


[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed/restricted) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-jpype [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fpylll [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected vim [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:9.0.1000-4ubuntu3.4]
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected flash-kernel [source] (lunar-proposed) [3.106ubuntu15]
[07:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected coreutils [source] (lunar-proposed) [9.1-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected budgie-desktop [source] (lunar-proposed) [10.7.1-1ubuntu3.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.1]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected open-vm-tools [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:12.3.5-3~ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected chromium-browser [source] (lunar-proposed) [2:1snap1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (lunar-proposed) [2.1.14-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[08:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-init [source] (lunar-proposed) [23.4.1-0ubuntu1~23.04.2]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-bitbucket-creachadair-shell [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.8-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cavaliergopher-rpm [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sassoftware-go-rpmutils [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-sigstore-protobuf-specs [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-veraison-go-cose [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-go-webauthn-webauthn [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-transparency-dev-merkle [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.2-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fpylll [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-shibumi-go-pathspec [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-adamkorcz-go-fuzz-headers-1 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20230919.8b5d3ce-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-jpype [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [amd64] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [s390x] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535-server [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [armhf] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-535 [arm64] (noble-proposed) [535.154.05-0ubuntu1]
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qutip [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.7.3-1]
[08:31] <ricotz>  xnox, hi, dropping *-fbc1-* in control in not correct - https://launchpadlibrarian.net/708564226/nvidia-graphics-drivers-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu2_545.29.06-0ubuntu3.diff.gz
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> autopkgtest for diaspora-installer/<IP_ADDRESS>+debian3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Test in progress, armhf: Regression ♻ , i386: Not a regression, ppc64el: Not a regression, s390x: Regression ♻
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, ginggs ^^ they are regressed in release, but since the package doesn't exist in release, the migration-reference/0 fails...
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> can we do something?
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> like hint, forget
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> unknown	migration-reference/0
[10:44] <LocutusOfBorg> this is what happens
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-protonmail-gluon [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, hello, is anybody working on libguestfs rebuild issues?
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> I would say we need a libvirt merge
[11:23] <LocutusOfBorg> Missing build dependencies: libvirt-dev (>= 9.8.0~)
[11:24] <LocutusOfBorg> libvirt-sys-perl is sad
[11:24] <doko> sergiodj: ^^^
[11:40] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/+archive/ubuntu/costamagnagianfranco-ppa/+sourcepub/15700348/+listing-archive-extra
[11:40] <LocutusOfBorg> sergiodj, ^^
[11:41] <LocutusOfBorg> this might even build :D
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:44] <LocutusOfBorg> well some libvirt-daemon-system revert can be now dropped
[12:45] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: yes, it looks like diaspora-installer can do with a hint
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (jammy-proposed/main) [2.765.34 => 2.765.35] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[12:48] <LocutusOfBorg> so this commit needs to be applied again? https://salsa.debian.org/libvirt-team/libvirt/-/commit/c62b8b27161bf69d6a8a47131450de3f81b1fe9d
[12:48] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit c62b8b2 in libvirt-team/libvirt "libvirt-daemon-system: Drop polkit rules in legacy pkla format"
[12:48] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, ^^
[12:49] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, no, we updated polkit in lunar, we are using .js as well now
[12:49] <seb128> sorry, in mantic
[12:51] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry seb128 I was meant to ping sergiodj ^^
[12:51] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, that revert should have been reverted already, but meh, somebody forgot about it...
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-protonmail-gluon [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.17.0-2]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.74.1+dfsg0ubuntu1-0ubuntu1]
[13:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeradius (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0.26~dfsg~git20220223.1.00ed0241fa-0ubuntu3.1 => 3.0.26~dfsg~git20220223.1.00ed0241fa-0ubuntu3.2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qatlib (noble-proposed/primary) [23.11.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iptables (jammy-proposed/main) [1.8.7-1ubuntu5.1 => 1.8.7-1ubuntu5.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[14:40] <xnox> ricotz: huh, indeed it is not, this is buggy ppc64le removal.
[14:41] <xnox> ricotz: will open a bug report about it.
[14:50] <sergiodj> LocutusOfBorg: hi, I talked to doko a few minutes ago but I won't be able to upload the new libvirt today as I was planning to (there's a regression that I still have to investigate). IIRC doko has plans to fix the issue with the perl package meanwhile
[14:51] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[14:54] <ricotz> xnox, please don't forget to push the packaging changes for 545
[14:54] <xnox> ricotz: ?
[14:55] <xnox> ricotz: note 545 is not a recommended driver, and should not be used by default
[14:56] <ricotz> xnox, I am referring to https://github.com/canonical/nvidia-graphics-drivers
[14:56] <xnox> ricotz: sure, but why do you use that repo?
[14:57] <ricotz> xnox, I am aware I am managing https://launchpad.net/~graphics-drivers/+archive/ubuntu/ppa
[14:58] <ricotz> xnox, thanks
[15:08] <xnox> ricotz: i am curious why you do that though. as it duplicates what we have in the archive; doesn't work with secureboot; breaks LRM; and causes multiple upgrade bugs between releases and supported users =/
[15:09] <xnox> ricotz: what benefit does that ppa have over the ubuntu archive?
[15:10] <xnox> ricotz: i also relly disline the attirbution -> binary package copies appear as if they were uploaded and endorsed by Canonical employess in said ppa
[15:10] <ricotz> xnox, the final release *if* they are available in ubuntu are binary copies, otherwise newer release are provided which are not made available in ubuntu yet
[15:12] <xnox> ricotz: you do understand we at ubuntu have pre-release access to all rc builds of drivers months ahead of them being public.
[15:12] <xnox> ricotz: and we don't publish them to the archive, due to known issues, bugs, regressions that make it critical to not make them available on ubuntu =)
[15:13] <xnox> ricotz: or we publishe them ahead of them being available publically....... i hope you can see that 535.154.05 was build days ahead of it being public.
[15:13] <xnox> ricotz: hence it is a disservice most of the time to publish things in that ppa.
[15:13] <ricotz> xnox, I know, there are internal releases made available early to you
[15:14] <ricotz> so I tend to provide NFB releases like 545, so users can decided to try it out or not
[15:14] <xnox> the way things packaged in that ppa, when one enables it, things work when they are inline with public archive and public LRM and then break the machines when they are not inline. And potentially shipping known regressions.
[15:15] <xnox> 545 was packaged in november, regressions found, and we held releasing it until regressions were fixed and verified by nvidia
[15:15] <xnox> hence it is now published.
[15:15] <xnox> ricotz: again, disservice.
[15:16] <xnox> ricotz: also you are using up disk space in the ppa, why do you feel the need to copy in archive builds of the driver into the ppa, instead of simply deleting it? (as that would be the same effect, people upgrading to the archive builds which are served with mirrors and CDN, rather than by launchpad service only)
[15:17] <xnox> (also note archive publications have snapshot service with longer timelines than ppas do)
[15:18] <ricotz> xnox, please take a breath and research the history of that ppa instead of discrediting it right now
[15:19] <ricotz> keeping things in sync feels more clear for users than removing the builds
[15:20] <ricotz> while Alberto was hardly reachable he also didn't made me aware of such concerns
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: php8.3 (noble-proposed/primary) [8.3.0-1]
[16:39] <Eickmeyer> Is cdimage (or something) stuck? I did a rebuild of both Edubuntu and Ubuntu Studio and neither appeared.
[16:53] <vorlon> I saw a build failure email for edubuntu
[16:53] <vorlon> due to an ephemeral failure
[17:01] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ^^
[17:15] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Doesn't explain the lack of Ubuntu Studio. Launchpad's logs show as successful for both, so it happened in the stage between there and publishing and I have completely forgotten where to look. Either way, I can't trigger a rebuild since iso.qa.u.c is stuck at "rebuilding" until a successful publication.
[17:16] <vorlon> yeah that bug is frustrating
[17:16] <vorlon> I'll retrigger them both manually
[17:16] <Eickmeyer> Indeed.
[17:16] <Eickmeyer> Thanks. :)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-qmix [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-6] (no packageset)
[17:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: logbook [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [1.7.0-1.0] (no packageset)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-qmix [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.6-6]
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted logbook [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-1.0]
[17:44] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Now that we have Edubuntu part of ubuntu-images for the Raspberry Pi, how do we go about getting daily images built?
[17:44] <Eickmeyer> I do realize we're in unprecedented territory.
[17:46] <jbicha> I believe Ubuntu Desktop/Server don't even do daily builds for Raspberry Pi
[17:46] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: They do.
[17:51] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: where?
[17:51] <Eickmeyer> jbicha: Desktop: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-preinstalled/ Server: https://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-server/daily-preinstalled/
[17:53] <jbicha> thank you
[17:53] <Eickmeyer> yw
[18:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-henrybear327-go-proton-api [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3] (no packageset)
[18:44] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: ubuntustudio timed out getting the seeds
[18:44] <bdmurray> an email was sent to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>is that the correct destination?
[18:44] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Oh, ok. Well, it's fine upon the retry.
[18:45] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: For some reason, those aren't going through. Not sure why.
[18:46] <tsimonq2> Reminds me that I need to follow up on bug 2039492 so all Kubuntu systems (and derivatives) aren't hammering git.l.n...
[18:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2039492 in plasma-distro-release-notifier (Ubuntu Noble) "[SRU] plasma-distro-release-notifier gets EOL data from git.launchpad.net" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2039492
[18:47] <tsimonq2> I remember asking Colin if there's signs of huge load on that page from his end, and his response (to my recollection) was "meh, pretty negligible, but this is worthwhile to fix."
[18:47] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: It doesn't look like any email has gone to that list
[18:48] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: Been waiting on that.
[18:49] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Been going through my old backlog and cleaning everything up anyway. I can commit to having a response to sitter upstream this week.
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: Yeah, strange. It should be. Originally it to a lists.ubuntu.com address, but we got complaints so we switched it to the launchapad one to try to alleviate that.
[18:49] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: 👍
[19:08] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer: you might check https://launchpad.net/~ubuntustudio-release/+mailinglist-moderate
[19:09] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray: https://i.imgur.com/F3imYb9.png
[19:10] <Eickmeyer>  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-henrybear327-go-proton-api [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-3]
[19:43] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: submit changes against lp:ubuntu-cdimage, and specifically etc/crontab
[19:43] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Ok, I'll get on it.
[19:43] <vorlon> and then that might fail because of some missing pieces in livecd-rootfs which we can work through
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.765.35]
[19:43] <vorlon> and then we also need to make sure we get it on the ISO tracker, with test cases
[19:44] <Eickmeyer> Sure, that makes sense.
[19:45] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: oh you will also need to update etc/default-arches to say which arches edubuntu daily-preinstalled is built for by default (namely, arm64+raspi and not amd64).  This should NOT go as an architecture override in etc/crontab
[19:45] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Noted. I'll be sure to be aware of that.
[19:47] <vorlon> EOL data from git.lp.n> lolwut
[19:48] <Eickmeyer> Seemed like a good idea at the time. Working on getting that changed.
[19:48] <Eickmeyer> With tsimonq2's help.
[19:48] <vorlon> wrt mail delivery, can confirm that mail to ubuntustudio-release@ successfully made it off the cdimage server for delivery
[19:49] <Eickmeyer> Can confirm that it didn't even make it to a spam folder here.
[19:50] <vorlon> that's a launchpad mailing list, so there should be a record on the server of it?
[19:51] <vorlon> by "server" I mean "web ui"
[19:53] <Eickmeyer> Sadly, I have nothing in the moderation queue.
[19:55] <vorlon> nor a log of auto-rejected messages?
[19:56] <Eickmeyer> Nor anything in the archive.
[19:56] <vorlon> ok.  the only escalation path is to Canonical IS then
[19:57] <bdmurray> Well maybe send a test message to the list from somewhere else
[19:57] <vorlon> if you do it from a mail server that you control and can see logs on, and will dispatch to lists.launchpad.net directly, yes
[20:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:07] <Eickmeyer> Yep, just tried a test email and everything is being lost to the ether. I'll ask IS and there will likely be an RT filed.
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:37] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: https://code.launchpad.net/~edubuntu-dev/ubuntu-cdimage/+git/ubuntu-cdimage/+merge/458839 ? Not sure if this looks right, but have fun grilling me.
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: samba [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:41] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: you should not (need to) pass SUBPROJECT
[20:43] <Eickmeyer> Should it run as a separate cron line then?
[20:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: also you shouldn't need to add an etc/default-arches line for the daily-live image since we're not meaning to change anything there
[20:44] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: separate cron line> orthogonal
[20:44] <vorlon> just don't set SUBPROJECT for it
[20:44] <Eickmeyer> Ah, I see.
[20:53] <vorlon> there's a bigger refactor in the back of my mind to consolidate the image dispatching to do it all around the same time of day instead of trying to stagger them around the clock, because the reason for the latter is definitively gone
[20:53] <vorlon> and then dispatch all commands in parallel with no cron entries with multiple commands in sequence
[20:53] <vorlon> but that's not your problem
[20:54] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: ack
[20:54] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Either way, I made the changes, so hopefully that should do the trick.
[20:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (jammy-backports) [4:7.5.9-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>~bpo22.04.1]
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted samba [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2:4.19.4+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (jammy-backports) [304-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.4-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [307-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:19] <tsimonq2> Very Important email sent to technical-board and ubuntu-release. This seems like another reminder for me to fix sending from @ubuntu.com...
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (jammy-backports) [308-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted limnoria [source] (jammy-backports) [2023.11.18-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gallery-dl [source] (jammy-backports) [1.26.5-1~bpo22.04.1]
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (lunar-backports) [304-1~bpo23.04.1]
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (lunar-backports) [307-1~bpo23.04.1]
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (lunar-backports) [82-1~bpo23.04.1]
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (lunar-backports) [308-1~bpo23.04.1]
[21:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cockpit [source] (mantic-backports) [307-1~bpo23.10.1]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-machines [source] (mantic-backports) [304-1~bpo23.10.1]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit [source] (mantic-backports) [308-1~bpo23.10.1]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cockpit-podman [source] (mantic-backports) [82-1~bpo23.10.1]
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [i386] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [i386] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcamera [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcamera [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[22:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-henrybear327-proton-api-bridge [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-2] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-henrybear327-proton-api-bridge [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[22:22] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: I mean "edubuntu", not "edubuntu-preinstalled"
[22:22] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Oh. 😅
[22:23] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: fixed
[22:31] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: oh ah we do also need to set it up as a livefs in launchpad (etc/livefs-launchpad); I'll take care of that bit there's no sense in you raising an MP since the cdimage team has to actually create the launchpad livefs entry
[22:31] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Makes sense.
[22:35] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Also, heads-up: I'm pretty sure it was you and your daughter(?) that inspired us to make an ubuntu-edu-music metapackage that won't be pre-installed, but to be made available. If you have any package suggestions, let me know. :)
[22:38] <vorlon> I have a son; not sure what would have inspired that?
[22:39] <Eickmeyer> Might've been a comment on a bug report, had something to do with rosegarden.
[22:39] <vorlon> not me
[22:39] <Eickmeyer> Ok, fair. Someone inspired it. :)
[22:51] <vorlon> So. do we want the information that edubuntu preinstalled is an 'ubuntu-image' project stored in livecd-rootfs, or in the launchpad livefs metadata
[22:51] <vorlon> for ubuntu desktop it's currently in both
[22:51] <vorlon> I think in principle it should be in launchpad so we continue to make livecd-rootfs increasingly thinner
[22:53] <Eickmeyer> Hmm... is there any major difference with how it's presented? I mean, would one preclude the other from being published on cdimage.u.c?
[22:53] <vorlon> no
[22:54] <Eickmeyer> So, I think if we don't need to use livecd-rootfs, let's not.
[22:54] <vorlon> we *use* livecd-rootfs; it's just a question of where to store this particular piece of information. and I'm convinced launchpad livefs metadata is the right answer
[22:55] <Eickmeyer> I'm inclined to agree so it's not stored a million different places.
[22:55] <vorlon> ok, https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/edubuntu-preinstalled/ now exists
[22:56] <Eickmeyer> Excellent.
[22:56] <vorlon> note that this is PROJECT=edubuntu and SUBPROJECT=preinstalled; changes will be needed to livecd-rootfs that match this
[22:56] <Eickmeyer> Ok. I'll take a look.
[23:01] <vorlon> kicking off a manual build that I know will fail, for funsies
[23:05] <vorlon> I love that launchpad gives an estimated finish time with no priors
[23:07] <sarnold> :D
[23:07] <sarnold> maybe it was a parting gift from colin, a quick little solution to the halting problem on his way out the door
[23:07] <vorlon> lol
[23:07] <vorlon> duration: 7.375µs
[23:07] <sarnold> lol
[23:07] <vorlon> well thank you for the precision, ubuntu-image
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-common-nighthawk-go-figure [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0~git20210622.734e95f-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: igor2 [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.5.3-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puppet-module-rally [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [5.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-zeebo-errs [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.3.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [amd64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [arm64] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-zeebo-errs [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [amd64] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted puppet-module-rally [amd64] (noble-proposed) [5.4.0-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted igor2 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.5.3-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [arm64] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[23:21] <Eickmeyer> 7.375µs> HAHAHAHA
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-common-nighthawk-go-figure [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0~git20210622.734e95f-1]
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nextcloud-spreed-signaling [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [armhf] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libsmacker [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-hickory-proto [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.24.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:27] <athos> Hi :) Could anyone please accept php8.3 from the new queue?
[23:28] <vorlon> do I have to
[23:29] <vorlon> done
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [armhf] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-hickory-proto [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.24.0-1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libsmacker [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php8.3 [sync] (noble-proposed) [8.3.0-1]
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted nextcloud-spreed-signaling [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[23:30] <athos> I suppose there is automation in place to accept packages in new. I wonder what the rules are (from checking the queue in the past few hours, it seems it was not being picked up)
[23:30] <athos> thanks, vorlon
[23:32] <doko> new processing is always manual
[23:33] <vorlon> athos: packages that are auto-synced from Debian are also auto-accepted from NEW but this was not auto-synced, it was manual.  binary packages that come from Debian syncs are batch-processed using the `new-binary-debian-universe` command.  But there is no automation for NEW source packages that are not Debian autosyncs
[23:33] <doko> did you ever see a response time from the server team below 5h? ;p
[23:33] <vorlon> it might be reasonable for us to have such automation IMHO
[23:35] <vorlon> success! (by which I mean fail) https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/noble/edubuntu-preinstalled/+build/565755
[23:35] <Eickmeyer> Task failed successfully
[23:35] <athos> aha! thanks :)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liblouisutdml [s390x] (noble-proposed/main) [2.12.0-3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[23:36] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: ^^ it actually got quite a bit farther than I expected trying to build this with ubuntu-image before failing, uh it even used the correct image definition file without there being TTBOMK any edubuntu-specific code in livecd-rootfs to know to do this? nevertheless it failed *during* ubuntu-image with an error I don't immediately understand
[23:37] <vorlon> "umount: /tmp/ubuntu-image-a610cb9f-2939-4dca-91d5-592ad944f29e/chroot/dev: target is busy." looks approximately like one of mwhudson's theses
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted liblouisutdml [s390x] (noble-proposed) [2.12.0-3]
[23:38] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: to try to reproduce this locally you would want to run ubuntu-image inside a lxd container
[23:39] <Eickmeyer> Yeah, uh... I just shot a MP? https://code.launchpad.net/~edubuntu-dev/livecd-rootfs/+git/livecd-rootfs/+merge/458851
[23:40] <Eickmeyer> Don't know if that will make a difference or not.
[23:41] <vorlon> it won't
[23:42] <Eickmeyer> Ok, so that's what you meant earlier.
[23:43] <vorlon> I am actually very pleasantly surprised that livecd-rootfs required no changes for this, that never happens
[23:44] <vorlon> I mean, in principle that's part of what we're trying to achieve with ubuntu-image. BUT STILL
[23:45] <Eickmeyer> Right. Still doesn't solve the problem with what I can only assume is the tmpfs being unmounted prematurely.
[23:46] <vorlon> that's not it, but there's no point trying to go into details here. it's an ubuntu-image bug, which I'll leave to you to file
[23:47] <Eickmeyer> Yay for me! /s
[23:49] <Eickmeyer> Bug 2049695
[23:49] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2049695 in Ubuntu Image "LXD build of edubuntu raspberry pi images fail" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2049695
[23:49] <Eickmeyer> Might be an inaccurate short description, but it's close.
[23:50] <vorlon> looks good
[23:50] <vorlon> I do encourage you to try to reproduce it on your own with an unadorned lxd container, to verify whether it needs launchpad's various lxd configuration bits to reproduce
[23:52] <Eickmeyer> I do wonder if it's the difference between 3.1 and 3.1+snap7 which has a lot of bug fixes. I'm assuming LP is grabbing 3.1 (stable)?
[23:52] <vorlon> the log should expose that information, does it?
[23:53] <vorlon> ubuntu-image 3.1 from Canonical** installed
[23:53] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: Yep. Just about to paste that.
[23:53] <Eickmeyer> 3.1 is pretty buggy.
[23:54] <vorlon> I don't know what the differences are between the two (or if there are such significant differences, why the new one is merely labeled '3.1+snap7').  But 3.1 is currently latest/stable, so yes
[23:55] <Eickmeyer> upils had me use 3.1+snap7 in the latest testing as it was missing some key fixes. I believe 3.1+snap7 is eventually supposed to turn into 3.2 if it gets more commits, but I'm not entirely sure, that's a Lukasz thing.
[23:56] <Eickmeyer> I do know that 3.1 is where I had the most failures.


[00:17] <pleia2> still need some summaries before we can move stuff to the wiki and send to editors
[01:16] <tsimonq2> pleia2: I'll get some done in about a half an hour if you still need them
[01:33] <pleia2> tsimonq2: yeah, thanks
[02:26] <tsimonq2> pleia2: suggested some edits on the IRC council announcement that I would like you to see. :)
[02:27] <pleia2> tsimonq2: I specifically removed the bullet points ;)
[02:27] <tsimonq2> just curious, why?
[02:27] <pleia2> I liked it better that way
[02:27] <tsimonq2> heh
[02:27] <tsimonq2> alright :)
[03:09] <jose> you guys needed something reviewed?
[03:09] <pleia2> no, still working on summaries
[03:10] <pleia2> othering on Other Community News or In the Press has been written it
[03:11] <pleia2> othering?
[03:11] <pleia2> nothing
[03:17] <jose> wrote a couple
[03:43] <tsimonq2> pleia2: moving the Featured Audio and Video over to the wiki page
[03:46] <tsimonq2> jeez...http://www.wired.com/2016/04/senates-draft-encryption-bill-privacy-nightmare/
[03:46] <tsimonq2> anyways
[03:49] <tsimonq2> pleia2: Dustin Kirkland: Container MacCloud: Can there really only be one? is an extremely peculiar article that I have no idea of how to even begin to write a summary for, could you take a look? I'll get a summary for the other planet article then I'll move it over to the wiki, so you should expect to do the summary there, alright?
[03:49] <tsimonq2> pleia2: (if you actually want to do the summary :) )
[04:02] <tsimonq2> planet moved
[04:03] <tsimonq2> other community news moved over
[04:04] <tsimonq2> general news moved over
[04:08] <tsimonq2> cloud news moved over
[04:13] <pleia2> tsimonq2: wait, I need to do editing
[04:13] <pleia2> tsimonq2: please let me move these things over next time :\
[04:13] <tsimonq2> I'm really sorry
[04:13] <pleia2> editing is MUCH easier for me to do in the google doc
[04:13] <tsimonq2> :| sorry
[04:13] <pleia2> it's ok
[04:14] <tsimonq2> I'll be careful next time :)
[04:14] <pleia2> thanks
[04:14] <tsimonq2> was just about to move phone over, wrote the summary for that
[04:15] <tsimonq2> then except for Canonical news which can be moved over as well (just bullet points), I was gonna call it a night
[04:16] <tsimonq2> I'll work on summaries tomorrow if I get up early enough or tonight on my phone if I can't sleep, but otherwise, have a good night :)
[04:44] <pleia2> I'll finish off the summaries in a bit and get it off to the editors before bed, thanks for your work tonight
[07:15] <pleia2> extending the Other Community News articles a bit
[07:23] <pleia2> Unit193: link check? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuWeeklyNewsletter/Issue461
[07:28] <Unit193> http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/ubuntu-my/3355-ubuntu-16.04-release-party-with-
[16:12] <pleia2> thanks, I'll hunt that one down
[16:13] <pleia2> aha, http://loco.ubuntu.com/events/ubuntu-my/3355-ubuntu-1604-release-party-with-ogstack-man-in-the-packets/
[17:21] <tsimonq2> pleia2: when is the earliest I can start helping with release? :)
[17:22] <pleia2> tsimonq2: as usual for Mondays, I'm at work :) so same as usual, ~5pm PDT for me
[17:23] <tsimonq2> pleia2: oh, alright :)
[17:24] <tsimonq2> 7 p\PM for me :)
[17:24] <tsimonq2> *PM
[17:49] <tsimonq2> pleia2: sent response
[17:49] <tsimonq2> (email)
[17:55] <tsimonq2> pleia2: are you sure Cloud News should be that small?
[17:57] <pleia2> tsimonq2: you can paste in here any links you think we're missing
[17:58] <pleia2> I can have a look, could be I missed them, or had reasons for not including them
[17:58] <pleia2> but I don't remember much from this past week
[20:05] <tsimonq2> pleia2: yeah me neither, it's been a tough week :)