[13:47] <robertm85> CLEAR
[16:17] <lpadilla_> hello
[18:48] <Shadal> I thought Open Days was starting this morning... ??
[18:48] <maco> 23rd, i thought
[18:49] <Shadal> oooo ;) I'm a week early..


[04:24] <guiverc> I'm getting a PDOException: SQLSTATE... error on http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/
[04:45] <guiverc> iso.qa.ubuntu.com is working for me again :)
[04:57] <guiverc> nah I'm still getting "PDOException: SQLSTATE[08006] [7] FATAL: connection limit exceeded for non-superusers in lock_may_be_available() (line 167 of /srv/drupal-qa-tracker/www/includes/lock.inc)."


[12:15] <Ubugtu> New bug: #71156 in xorg-server "Acceleration fails to work with Dual-Head configuration." [Unknown,Unknown]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/71156
[07:21] <Ubugtu> New bug: #71167 in xorg (main) "installer and livecd should detect vmware mouse device and use the right driver" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/71167
[02:05] <Ubugtu> New bug: #71138 in xkeyboard-config (main) "Meta is mapped to Win keys, not respected by certain applications" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/71138
[08:50] <Ubugtu> New bug: #71265 in xserver-xorg-video-ati "Radeon Mobility M6: No DRI" [Undecided,Unconfirmed]  http://launchpad.net/bugs/71265


[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [armhf] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (eoan-proposed) [1.35.0+dfsg0.1+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: hypre [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [2.16.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [s390x] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [amd64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [i386] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [armhf] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pdal [arm64] (eoan-proposed/universe) [1.9.1+ds-1] (no packageset)


[00:55] <smoser> slangasek, if you're sitting there twiddling your thumbs, and you have any ideas on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1611074 i'd like to hear them.
[00:55] <slangasek> hard to type and twiddle at the same time
[00:56] <smoser> i ususally peck with my nose.
[00:56] <smoser> it wastes time that way too
[00:57] <smoser> slangasek, one thing that seems wrong... but i'm not sure its entirely related.
[00:57] <smoser> http://paste.ubuntu.com/23488127/
[00:57] <smoser> when i run that script well after boot, sometimes i hit line 29.. that is to say systemd magically  mounts the partition for me.
[00:59] <slangasek> smoser: but in this context you're repartitioning it from a booted state?  in which case the x-systemd.requires won't protect you
[00:59] <smoser> correct.
[00:59] <smoser> but i'd still find it odd and wrong to umount anad then have something magically mount for me.
[01:01] <smoser> and i'im not convinced that its not related.
[01:01] <smoser> most certainly, systaemd generator writes those files based on the stale fstab
[01:01] <slangasek> it doesn't seem incorrect for systemd to automount for you a device that it discovers via udev, post-boot, whose deps are satisfied
[01:01] <smoser> it seems to me that that should be a 'once' thing.
[01:02] <smoser> no other mount service continually mounts automatically for you.
[01:02] <xnox> unless there is .automount unit; or udev got retriggered for the device; "stop" the .mount unit manually?
[01:02] <smoser> especially wrong when it could be mounting garbage of a filesystem that just happend to be at the place where you put the new partition.
[01:02] <slangasek> xnox: in this context, udev has gotten retriggered for the device yes
[01:03] <xnox> check the generator and the .automount / .mount units in /run/systemd ?!
[01:03] <slangasek> smoser: so don't label your garbage with the exact same name that you were using to mount it by in /etc/fstab?
[01:03] <slangasek> because this is the exact same code used to automount a removable device when you plug it in
[01:04] <slangasek> which you might remove, and want to mount again
[01:04] <xnox> use $ wipefs -a -> to wipe garbage off the partition?
[01:04] <smoser> slangasek, you've not gotten a chance at that point to write a filesystem.
[01:04] <smoser> and xnox your case doesn't even help... its really busted.
[01:04] <smoser> yes, you can be careful and get aroudn this
[01:04] <smoser> but it is nonsense.
[01:04] <smoser> ie, if you want to repartition a disk, you have to:
[01:04] <slangasek> smoser: yes, because your fstab refers to the partition in a way that triggers the mount before you've created a filesystem
[01:04] <smoser>  a.) unmount everythin
[01:05] <smoser>  b.) seek to the new partition table offsets and wipe any filesystem stuff that might possibly be there.
[01:05] <slangasek> so if you're expecting to be able to do this online, post-boot... don't refer to the filesystem by a device name that shows up before the filesystem is created?
[01:05] <smoser>  c.) partition it
[01:05] <smoser>  d.) mkfs the partition
[01:06] <smoser> you have to do 'b' because where you put the new partition might have had a valid filesystem signature.  even from an attack of some sort.
[01:07] <xnox> wipefs does support offset argument -o
[01:07] <smoser> interestingly, udev in all its auto-glory watches rw opens on /dev/devices
[01:07] <xnox> smoser, i had hallarious bug reports in d-i w.r.t. serial re-installers in virtual machines, that use host LVM volumes as backing device stores.
[01:07] <smoser> and rescans partitiontables for you automatically when wipefs closes
[01:07] <smoser> so... lots of fun.
[01:08] <smoser> right. this magic is quite nonhelpful when you dont want it.
[01:08] <xnox> smoser, because create a fresh volume, may just align with old volume, and give you perfectly valid filesystem signatures, to bust the installations in funny ways.
[01:08] <smoser> thats what im' saying
[01:08] <smoser> *and* that data could actually be an attack
[01:08] <slangasek> if you don't want it, that's called 'noauto'
[01:09] <smoser> in your /etc/fstab entry, yes.
[01:09] <smoser> which was stale
[01:09] <smoser> and is still magically present when you remove it
[01:09] <slangasek> how is it stale
[01:09] <smoser> because /etc/fstab isn't the thing that is doing these mounts
[01:09] <slangasek> ?
[01:09] <smoser> its stale because its present from before the stop
[01:09] <xnox> systemd-fstab-generator
[01:09] <smoser> and then the new disk attached.
[01:09] <slangasek> it's stale /with respect to what/?
[01:10] <slangasek> your example script doesn't show any editing of /etc/fstab
[01:10] <xnox> so unmount; remove ftab; systemctl daemon-reload (which should retrigger generators, and remove stale .mount generated units); do things; write new ftab; mount things ?
[01:10] <smoser> sure. but that doesnt matter, slangasek.
[01:10] <slangasek> it shows systemd following the instructions it's been given, faster than you're expecting
[01:10] <smoser> i can do it, it doesnt stop the .mount service
[01:10] <smoser> no one expects to edit /etc/fstab and stop a service to partition a disk.
[01:11] <smoser> (i have specifically taken the line out of /etc/fstab)
[01:11] <smoser> so yes, best case what you're suggesting is that i have to
[01:11] <smoser> a.) edit /etc/fstab
[01:11] <smoser> b.) systemctl daemon-reload
[01:11] <smoser> c.) partition , mkfs
[01:11] <smoser> d.) edit /etc/fstab
[01:11] <smoser> e.) mount
[01:12] <smoser> and 'b'probably doesnt work during boot
[01:12] <smoser> i dont know that, but i suspect as many systemd things do not
[01:13] <slangasek> isn't the *actual* problem you're trying to solve that systemd should not automount the disk at boot time, before cloud-init has run?
[01:15] <slangasek> if so, let's please solve that problem, and not have a proxy battle about how automounting is designed in systemd
[01:15] <slangasek> if not, I don't understand the scope of the bug so please explain it to me
[01:15] <smoser> yes thats the problem. but i think it is related to the magic that i'm seeing.
[01:15] <smoser> its possible its not.
[01:16] <smoser> but essentially, cloud-init is doing the same thing as the script during boot, and then failing to mkfs because something has mounted the device.
[01:16] <smoser> i' not certain its related to this, but it seems similar.
[01:17] <slangasek> /rules.d/80-iio-sensor-proxy.rules
[01:17] <slangasek> haaate
[01:18] <slangasek> smoser: in the case where it has failed at boot, what are the contents of /run/systemd/generator/mnt.mount ?
[01:19] <smoser> i'll recreate. it'll take me a bit.
[01:19] <smoser> anything else you might want from before the failed boot ?
[01:21] <slangasek> smoser: I don't know well enough what all I would want; I would really want to debug it interactively
[01:24] <smoser> slangasek, i can let you in before and after.
[01:25] <smoser> slangasek, my attempts to simplify fail
[01:25] <smoser> ie, i've booted system... then just partitioned the existing disk and put ntfs on partition 1
[01:25] <smoser> and then rebooted
[01:25] <smoser> which is much the same as stop, new ephemeral diska ttached, start
[01:26] <smoser> but i believe the start after resize has slower disks at first
[01:26] <smoser> and so we hit it there but not on the "warm" reboot disks
[01:26] <smoser> at least i've not seen it my way
[01:38] <smoser> slangasek, if you want ssh<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[01:38] <smoser> that is prior to resize
[01:38] <slangasek> smoser: and without an up-to-date /etc/fstab?
[01:38] <slangasek> /dev/disk/cloud/azure_resource-part1	/mnt	auto	defaults,nofail,comment=cloudconfig	0	2
[01:38] <smoser> no modifications to that.
[01:38] <smoser> yeah
[01:39] <smoser> i saved a bunch of stuff in first-boot
[01:39] <slangasek> so you'll be manually changing that before resizing?
[01:39] <smoser> we can reboot ( which will do that)
[01:39] <smoser> or we can manually do it
[01:39] <smoser> i'm apt to reboot, and collect those logs and state and such
[01:39] <smoser> and then resizse
[01:40] <smoser> so far, launch, add proposed && install cloud-init , collect some info
[01:41] <slangasek> smoser: if you rely on fstab being updated via reboot, then indeed you could be fighting with the systemd fstab generator
[01:41] <slangasek> oh
[01:41] <slangasek> you mean reboot once, to regenerate fstab; then reboot again for the resize?
[01:41] <smoser> right.
[01:42] <slangasek> yeah, +1
[01:43] <smoser> ok. rebooted, ran 'save-old-data second-boot'
[01:43] <smoser> and
[01:43] <smoser> /dev/disk/cloud/azure_resource-part1	/mnt	auto	defaults,nofail,x-systemd.requires=cloud-init.service,comment=cloudconfig	0	2
[01:44] <smoser> and now api resize
[01:46] <slangasek> smoser: right - fstab looks good, /run/systemd/generator/mnt.mount still wrong but that's as expected
[01:46] <smoser> wrong ?
[01:47] <slangasek> smoser: /run/systemd/generator/mnt.mount was generated by systemd-fstab-generator before cloud-init updated /etc/fstab, therefore it has the wrong dependencies
[01:47] <smoser> right.
[01:51] <smoser> slangasek, ok. its back up, and it reproduced
[01:51] <smoser> and, slangasek, thank you for your help.
[01:52] <slangasek> smoser: ok. 'systemctl status mnt.mount' told me 'Warning: mnt.mount changed on disk. Run 'systemctl daemon-reload' to reload unit'
[01:53] <slangasek> smoser: but 'systemctl show mnt.mount' does show the correct dependencies for the running unit
[01:54] <smoser> right.
[01:55] <slangasek> smoser: 'systemctl list-dependencies' makes me somewhat suspicious, mnt.mount isn't shown as depending on cloud-init.service
[01:55] <smoser> and nothing actually changed in the /etc/fstab, its just that systemd recognized probably a timestamp cahnge in /etc/fstab and says its out of date.
[01:55] <smoser> slangasek, it does show it
[01:56] <smoser> at least
[01:56] <smoser>  systemctl list-dependencies mnt.mount
[01:56] <smoser> does
[01:56] <slangasek> yes
[01:58] <smoser> thats interesting
[01:58] <slangasek> smoser: and cloud-init.service is where the resize happens.  And cloud-init.service is Type=oneshot.
[01:58] <smoser> right.
[01:58] <slangasek> so After=cloud-init.service is basically "start this as soon as you've exec()ed the other one"
[01:58] <slangasek> systemd.service(5), Type=
[01:59] <slangasek> e
[01:59] <slangasek> er
[01:59] <slangasek> no, sorry
[01:59] <slangasek> that's completely wrong, I should read more carefully teh description of oneshot ;)
[02:00] <smoser> hmm.
[02:00] <smoser> RemainAfterExit is odd though
[02:00] <smoser> wrt oneshot and requires
[02:01] <smoser> "RemainAfterExit= is particularly useful for this type of service"
[02:01] <smoser> s/useful/confusing/
[02:01] <smoser> what would that even mean.. if the thing remains, you could essentially never be After
[02:01] <slangasek> smoser: it means that it's listed as 'active', but no changes to the behavior of After
[02:02] <smoser> that makes more sense.
[02:02] <slangasek> smoser: '/usr/bin/cloud-init init' wouldn't background for any reason, would it?
[02:02] <smoser> well... it could start some processes
[02:02] <smoser> that backgrounded
[02:02] <smoser> but it wont.
[02:03] <slangasek> so the top-level cloud-init process is still running while the partitioning/mkfs is happening
[02:03] <smoser> yeah
[02:03] <smoser> but it might start a daemon of some sort
[02:05] <slangasek> smoser: why does 'systemctl status cloud-init' show the job's last status change at 01:49:06, but the last journal output entries at 01:49:07?
[02:05] <smoser> try monotnoic
[02:05] <smoser> the clock bounces all over the place on those system.s
[02:05] <slangasek> heh
[02:06] <smoser> but i dont know if you can get monotonic on status
[02:06] <smoser> can you ?
[02:06] <slangasek> doesn't appear so
[02:06] <slangasek> but if I compare stamps from mnt.mount and cloud-init.service, mnt.mount is definitely after
[02:07] <slangasek> smoser: and the timestamp shown in /var/log/cloud-init.log for mkfs.ext4 is 2016-11-17 01:49:09, which is definitely later than what was reported in the journal for either job... so seems less likely to be due to a clock bounce
[02:08] <smoser> journalctl -o short-monotonic --no-pager --full
[02:08] <smoser> and you can see
[02:08] <smoser> [  256.905798] reprovm systemd[1]: Time has been changed
[02:09] <smoser> so one really wierd thing that happens on azure...
[02:09] <smoser> we bounce eth0 (ifdown ; ifup)
[02:09] <smoser> because thats how you publish your hostname (if the user modified it) to the platform
[02:10] <smoser> i dont think its related... but it means dhcp hooks and possibly time jumps and lots of general wierdness.
[02:10] <smoser> so i'm just mentioning
[02:10] <slangasek> smoser: well, hard to be sure without monotonic log output for cloud-init.log itself then
[02:11] <smoser> well, you can get it..
[02:11] <smoser> from journalctl
[02:11] <smoser> as cloud-init writes to journal its stdout
[02:11]  * slangasek looks
[02:11] <smoser> so the time obviously differs by when it got seen versus when it got written
[02:11] <smoser> but, kind of no way to avoid that
[02:12] <slangasek> smoser: well, journalctl -u cloud-init.service is only showing me a handful of lines, not all the output in /var/log/cloud-init.log
[02:12] <smoser> hm..
[02:13] <smoser> just journalctl -o short-monotnoic
[02:13] <smoser> i see
[02:13] <smoser> [   23.003468] reprovm systemd[1]: Mounted /mnt.
[02:13] <slangasek> smoser: and the output shown in journalctl -u cloud-init.service also does not appear in /var/log/cloud-init.log
[02:14] <smoser> right.
[02:14] <smoser> because it is set to write debug to log
[02:14] <smoser> but less verbose to stdout
[02:14] <smoser> we can cahnge that and try again
[02:14] <slangasek> smoser: actually, this log did finally show me what I needed
[02:14] <slangasek> with -o short-monotonic
[02:14] <slangasek> [   22.998682] reprovm systemd[1]: Started Initial cloud-init job (metadata service crawler).
[02:15] <slangasek> [   24.812954] reprovm cloud-init[1077]: Failed to exec of '['/sbin/mkfs.ext4', '/dev/sdb1']':
[02:15] <slangasek> the job was marked 'started' 2 seconds before the mkfs was run
[02:15] <slangasek> so cloud-init does somehow seem to be backgrounding this
[02:16] <slangasek> rather, this doesn't look at all like it's running mkfs from the cloud-init.service
[02:16] <slangasek> but from cloud-config.service
[02:16] <slangasek> so... wrong dep?
[02:18] <smoser> well, cloud-init.service is supposed to be running them.
[02:18] <smoser> is there a way to tell journalctl not to rotate
[02:19] <smoser> whenver i give it fire hose, i find later that it can't show me stuff saying its rotated
[02:20] <smoser> you're right, it certainly does seem to be running fromcloud-config, but it should not be.
[02:20] <slangasek> it's configurable, i don't recall how. you can also touch the file to get an on-disk journal, which we don't do by default, then you don't have to rotate to avoid running out of memory
[02:21] <slangasek> ok
[02:21] <smoser> oh.
[02:21] <slangasek> but I'm guessing you can take it from there to figure out why it's being run from the wrong part of cloud-init :)
[02:21] <smoser> yeah. thank you.
[06:42] <cpaelzer> good morning
[07:26] <pitti> Good morning
[07:36] <cpaelzer> pitti: h
[07:36] <cpaelzer> i
[07:36] <cpaelzer> pitti: FYI on the gnutls thing I mentioned hitting libvirt yesterday
[07:36] <cpaelzer> pitti: it seems we need to revert that change in gnutls instead of adapting libvirt
[07:37] <cpaelzer> pitti: I added a gnutls task to the bug I was working on and currently prepping an upload for a ppa to try it out
[07:37] <cpaelzer> pitti: that was bug 1641615
[07:52] <pitti> cpaelzer: that's only gnutls30, right? I thought 28 was still the default (not sure if there's a transition going on)
[07:54] <cpaelzer> pitti: I must admit the gnutls package versioning is hard at first so IÄm not sure I get it completely yet
[07:54] <cpaelzer> pitti: it is libgnutls30 with headers in libgnutls28-dev out of source gnutls28
[07:54] <cpaelzer> pitti: did that make sens to you?
[07:54] <pitti> not off-hand -- I haven't looked into this at all
[07:55] <cpaelzer> pitti: the changelog says you did the merge which is why I was highlighting you :-)
[07:56] <pitti> oh right, this isn't a transition; it's just weird naming
[08:16] <tuxinator> anybody that may help me with my ubumirror problem? hard to offer a mirror server to the community if the actual mirror scripts don't work as expected :D
[08:19] <cpaelzer> hi tuxinator I've seen your request like three times but have no experience around that
[08:19] <cpaelzer> tuxinator: but I really appreciate the support willing to provide a mirror - maybe the right people are not here on the itme you are asking ... ?
[08:20] <cpaelzer> tuxinator: have you tried asking at https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mirrors ?
[08:21] <cpaelzer> tuxinator: there also seems to be a #ubuntu-mirrors IRC channel on freenode - thou I'm not sure on that one
[08:21] <cpaelzer> surely there the request won't be drowned in so many other messages
[08:24] <cpaelzer> tuxinator: there also is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>- not sure which mail is for the offical mirrors and which for mirror clones of any sort
[09:51] <caribou> pitti: has systemd unit masking (i.e. linking the unit to /dev/null) a recent introduction in systemd ?
[09:53] <pitti> caribou: no, that has existed basically forever
[09:54] <pitti> (for sure "forever" in ubuntu)
[09:54] <caribou> pitti: ok thanks just wanted to be sure
[10:13] <infinity> TheMuso: I don't understand why you dropped pulseaudio-equalizer.  Yes, its deps are in universe, but it's perfectly fine for a source in main to produce a binary in universe.
[10:14] <infinity> TheMuso: Seems like an entirely pointless delta from Debian.
[11:42] <cjwatson> LocutusOfBorg: please file a bug against the git-build-recipe project about that
[11:42] <cjwatson> tuxinator: I asked you a question to try to narrow down your problem but you didn't reply
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> cjwatson, probably I was disconnected
[11:44] <LocutusOfBorg> will look to logs
[11:44] <cpaelzer> pitti: on bug 1641615 I created a gnutls fix - since you made the merge could you take a look at reviewing and sponsoring that?
[11:45] <LocutusOfBorg> oh was directed to tuxinator the second sentence
[11:46] <pitti> cpaelzer: ack, queueing
[11:50] <cpaelzer> pitti: thanks and if possible keep me up to date so I can follow with the matching libvirt un-fix which is needed now (or push that along if you e.g. push that via bileto - its debdiff is on the bug as well)
[11:58] <tuxinator> cpaelzer: thanks
[11:58] <tuxinator> cpaelzer: actually there is no hurry :D
[13:50] <mdeslaur> pitti: hi! are we going to get postgresql-9.6 in zesty, or should I revert the pgmemcache package back to supporting 9.5?
[14:01] <mdeslaur> pitti: I'll just revert it for now so I can get my other stuff migrated
[14:07] <pitti> mdeslaur: I haven't thought much about this; TBH, I think we should avoid major version bumps in the non-LTS releases, as that simplifies maintenance
[14:07] <pitti> and noone in their right mind would use a 9-month release for a server/production setup anyway
[14:07] <pitti> mdeslaur: so I was going to leave it at 9.5 until people complain loudly :)
[14:07] <mdeslaur> pitti: sounds good, thanks!
[14:22] <bswartz> if I wanted to fix a bug in an ubuntu package file (the .dsc file) where would I go to submit that change?
[14:22] <pitti> cpaelzer: this is all backported from trunk, right?
[14:23] <cpaelzer> pitti: yes
[14:23] <cpaelzer> pitti: the git ids are from gnutls
[14:23] <pitti> cpaelzer: note, as these symbols are not really from upstream 3.5.6, .symbols must be stricter
[14:23] <pitti> + gnutls_ocsp_resp_get_responder2@GNUTLS_3_4 3.5.6-4ubuntu2~
[14:23] <pitti> cpaelzer: ^ like this
[14:23] <cpaelzer> pitti: true, but there is no 3.5.7 nor a 3.5 release
[14:23] <pitti> cpaelzer: (fixing here, just OOI)
[14:23] <pitti> s/OOI/FYI/
[14:24] <pitti> TLAs are hard!
[14:25] <pitti> cpaelzer: ack, thanks; uploaded
[14:25] <pitti> cpaelzer: either reupload libvirt after it built/published everywhere, or bump the build dep to that version
[14:38] <Odd_Bloke> rbasak: If I want to request a package be added to a packageset, I should send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and then add it to the agenda for an upcoming DMB meeting, right?
[14:40] <rbasak> Odd_Bloke: correct. It shouldn't be a requirement to add it to the agenda, but no harm if you do - if anything it gives us a place to assign it to someone to deal with if it doesn't get looked at before a meeting.
[15:28] <kdub> anyone know a trick to get a foreign build-dep to work within a cross-compile chroot? (eg, apt-get build-dep <pkg>:arm64)
[15:29] <kdub> it always seems to get tangled up trying to install and run foreign packages (eg, python)
[16:54] <nacc> doko: i think i figured out the freeradius issue; will send to debian and z-p
[18:05] <nacc> so freeradius has a /var/log/freeradius/wtmp and /var/log/freeradius/utmp file. One of it's autopkgtests just runs `radlast` which looks at that wtmp file. However, by default, that file doesn't see to exist. Normally, what would be responsible for creating that file? A debian postinst step? The freeradius daemon itself?
[18:06] <nacc> *see -> seem
[18:46] <nacc> ah i think i see what is supposed to happen -- the 'unix' driver creates the wtmp file on the first accounting with freeradius
[18:46] <nacc> not sure how that worked in 16.04 w/ the same tests, will go investigate
[18:56] <nacc> ah ha, in 16.04, postinst created the files
[19:11] <bswartz> if I wanted to fix a bug in an ubuntu package file (the .dsc file) where would I go to submit that change?
[19:15] <nacc> bswartz: which package?
[19:15] <nacc> bswartz: it sort of depends, but the normal way for a user without upload rights to submit, is to open a bug, and put a debdiff in the bug
[19:16] <bswartz> nacc: xfce4-clipman-plugin
[19:17] <bswartz> nacc: I did open a bug but I'm not 100% it was in the right place
[19:17] <nacc> bswartz: bug #?
[19:17] <bswartz> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-clipman-plugin/+bug/1641802
[19:26] <nacc> bswartz: have you worked on debian or ubuntu packages before? (just trying to konw where to start to help you out)
[19:27] <bswartz> nacc: I've hacked on all kinds of things -- modifying .dsc files seems to be particularly easy
[19:27] <bswartz> I'm not sure what the offcial workflow is for testing a change though
[19:27] <nacc> bswartz: right, you generally wouldn't chagne the .dsc file directly
[19:27] <bswartz> In my case I simply couldn't stand my eye's bleeding at how bad the xfce4-clipman plugin in Ubuntu is compared to Fedora, so I decided to fix it for myself
[19:28] <nacc> bswartz: so here's my suggestion just to get you going:
[19:28] <nacc> in an appropriate directory: pull-lp-soure -cd xfce4-clipman-plugin
[19:28] <nacc> bah
[19:28] <nacc> -d (not -cd)
[19:28] <nacc> and pull-lp-source
[19:29] <nacc> and actually, in your case, just pull-lp-source (no -d flag either)
[19:29] <nacc> so let me start over! :)
[19:29] <nacc> pull-lp-source xfce4-clipman-plugin
[19:29] <nacc> cd xfce4-clipman-plugin-<tab>
[19:29] <nacc> make some changes
[19:29] <nacc> dch -i
[19:29] <nacc> describe your changes and put the right version in
[19:30] <nacc> (as well as targeting the correct release)
[19:30] <nacc> dpkg-buildpackage -S -nc -d -uc -us
[19:30] <nacc> cd ..
[19:31] <nacc> debdiff xfce4-clipman-plugin_<old version>.dsc xfce4-clipman-plugin_<new version>.dsc | less
[19:31] <nacc> (review the diff)
[19:31] <nacc> if it looks good, you can do:
[19:31] <bswartz> pull-lp-source: Warning: Distribution data outdated. Please check for an update for distro-info-data. See /usr/share/doc/distro-info-data/README.Debian for details. Or specify a distribution.
[19:31] <bswartz> I'm on xenial
[19:32] <nacc> debdiff xfce4-clipman-plugin_<old version>.dsc xfce4-clipman-plugin_<new version>.dsc | lp-attach <bug #>
[19:32] <nacc> bswartz: hrm, are you up-to-date?
[19:32] <bswartz> I thought I was
[19:32] <nacc> bswartz: i thought they had rolled out hte zesty data to the older distributions
[19:35] <bswartz> turns out some things did need updating, I'm dist-upgrading now
[19:35] <nacc> bswartz: ok, that will probably just make xenial aware that zesty exists (so it can recognize the name, etc)
[19:36] <nacc> doko: jgrimm: freeradius autopkgtests pass now, uploaded and sent the fix to debian
[19:40] <jgrimm> thanks nacc
[19:41] <bswartz> nacc: now I am, and it fixed that problem
[19:41] <nacc> bswartz: cool
[19:48] <bswartz> nacc: where do I express the build dependencies other than in the .dsc file?
[19:49] <nacc> bswartz: debian/control in the source pacakge
[19:49] <bswartz> aha!
[19:49] <nacc> bswartz: sorry :)
[19:50] <nacc> bswartz: right so you'd edit that file, updat the changelog and then rebuild the source pacakge (which will generate a new .dsc in the parent directory)
[19:52] <Unit193> -clipman-plugin is currently in sync with Debian, it'd be faaaaar better to fix it there.
[19:52] <nacc> bswartz: and to be clear, note that you first need to fix anything in zesty and then follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates for getting it into older releases, if applicable
[19:53] <nacc> Unit193: excellent point, i figured that might be the response in the bug
[19:53] <bswartz> nacc: why did lp-attach launch lynx?
[19:53] <bswartz> >_<
[19:53] <nacc> bswartz: hrm, not sure? maybe it tried to open the bug? if you piped to it, it doesn't do that, at least last i used it
[19:54] <nacc> bswartz: you can also manually take the debdiff and attach it to the bug
[19:54] <bswartz> it's trying to do an openid transaction
[19:54] <nacc> bswartz: oh because you need to be auth'd to use it
[19:54] <bswartz> oh well I can sort this out with a real web browser later
[19:54] <nacc> bswartz: sorry, forgot that bit (i'm always auth'd at home)
[19:54] <bswartz> thanks or you help
[19:56] <bswartz> Unit193: what is the process for debian? do they use launchpad too?
[19:56] <Unit193> Generally file a bug and attach a debdiff.
[19:56] <bswartz> Unit193: file a bug in launchpad? what project?
[19:57] <nacc> bswartz: you can use `reportbug -B debian`
[19:57] <nacc> bswartz: no, debian uses bugs.debian.org
[19:58] <bswartz> k
[20:42] <hjd> I'm having a strange issue here. My zesty vm seems to be unable to ping or browser .org domains (for instance http://debian.org). Anyone know if this is a known issue or what the cause might be? My host (16.04) has no problems.
[20:49] <bswartz> hjd: why do you mention .org domains? do .com domains work fine?
[20:51] <hjd> Yes, various .com domains, .no domains and launchpad.net all work. I first thought it was something with debian.org, but I tried some other random .org domains and they all keep failing for some reason
[21:20] <bswartz> hjd: I'd recommend testing whether DNS is resolving okay and if not, use a different resolver
[21:21] <bswartz> hjd: if DNS is resolving for those org domains then you have a routing or firewall problem
[21:34] <sladen> hjd: type   'host foo.org'  on the commandline and see if that resolves
[21:39] <hjd> sladen: http://paste.ubuntu.com/23492450/
[21:40] <hjd> I can ping the ip adresse just fine, but if I try to ping wikipedia.org I only get "Name or service not known"
[21:42] <sladen> hjd: is there a difference depending on if you 'ping 2620:0:862:ed1a::1' or if you 'ping <IP_ADDRESS>' ?
[21:42] <bswartz> sladen: you mean ping6
[21:44] <sladen> bswartz: yes, the aim is to see whether it might be IPv4 vs. IPv6.  The particular choice of tools is optional :)
[21:44] <hjd> IPv4 works, IPv6 Network is unreachable
[21:45] <bswartz> hjd: if it turns out your problems are related to IPv6 being prefered over IPv4 then you can easily change the preference with this one-liner:
[21:45] <bswartz> echo 'precedence ::ffff:0:0/96 100' | sudo tee -a /etc/gai.conf
[21:56] <hjd> bswartz: Hm... didn't seem to make a difference.
[21:57] <hjd> Anyway, it's getting late, but thanks for the help all :)