* Hannart et al. [2016] A. Hannart, J. Pearl, F. E. Otto, P. Naveau, and M. Ghil.  Causal counterfactual theory for the attribution of weather and climate-related events.  _Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc._ , 97(1):99–110, 2016\.
  * Hansen and Sokol [2014] N. Hansen and A. Sokol.  Causal interpretation of stochastic differential equations.  _Electronic Journal of Probability_ , 19:1 – 24, 2014.
  * Hastie et al. [2015] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and M. Wainwright.  Statistical learning with sparsity.  _Monographs on statistics and applied probability_ , 143:143, 2015.
  * Haufe et al. [2014] S. Haufe, F. Meinecke, K. Görgen, S. Dähne, J.-D. Haynes, B. Blankertz, and F. Bießmann.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging.  _NeuroImage_ , 87:96–110, 2014.
  * Heinze-Deml et al. [2018a] C. Heinze-Deml, M. H. Maathuis, and N. Meinshausen.  Causal structure learning.  _Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application_ , 5:371–391, 2018a.
  * Heinze-Deml et al. [2018b] C. Heinze-Deml, J. Peters, and N. Meinshausen.  Invariant causal prediction for nonlinear models.  _Journal of Causal Inference_ , 6(2), 2018b.
  * Heisenberg [1925] W. Heisenberg.  Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen.  _Zeitschrift für Physik_ , 33(3):879–893, 1925\.
  * Hempel [2001] C. G. Hempel.  _The philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in science, explanation, and rationality_.  Oxford University Press, 2001.
  * Hernan and Robins [2020] M. Hernan and J. Robins.  _Causal Inference: What if_.  Chapman & Hill/CRC, 2020.
  * Hernán [2018] M. A. Hernán.  The C-word: Scientific euphemisms do not improve causal inference from observational data.  _American journal of public health_ , 108(5):616–619, 2018.
  * Hicks et al. [1980] J. Hicks et al.  _Causality in Economics_.  Australian National University Press, 1980.
  * Hiemstra and Jones [1994] C. Hiemstra and J. D. Jones.  Testing for linear and nonlinear Granger causality in the stock price-volume relation.  _The Journal of Finance_ , 49(5):1639–1664, 1994\.
  * Hinton and Salakhutdinov [2006] G. E. Hinton and R. Salakhutdinov.  Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks.  _Science_ , 313:504–507, 2006.
  * Hoyer et al. [2008] P. Hoyer, D. Janzing, J. M. Mooij, J. Peters, and B. Schölkopf.  Nonlinear causal discovery with additive noise models.  In D. Koller, D. Schuurmans, Y. Bengio, and L. Bottou, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 21. Curran Associates, Inc., 2008.
  * Huang et al. [2015] B. Huang, K. Zhang, and B. Schölkopf.  Identification of time-dependent causal model: A Gaussian process treatment.  In _Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence_ , Ijcai’15, page 3561–3568. AAAI Press, 2015.  ISBN 9781577357384.
  * Huang et al. [2019] B. Huang, K. Zhang, M. Gong, and C. Glymour.  Causal Discovery and Forecasting in Nonstationary Environments with State-Space Models.  In K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, editors, _Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning_ , volume 97 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 2901–2910. Pmlr, 09–15 Jun 2019.
  * Huang et al. [2020] B. Huang, K. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Ramsey, R. Sanchez-Romero, C. Glymour, and B. Schölkopf.  Causal discovery from heterogeneous/nonstationary data.  _The Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 21(1):3482–3534, 2020.
  * Huang and Valtorta [2006] Y. Huang and M. Valtorta.  Pearl’s calculus of intervention is complete.  In R. Dechter and T. Richardson, editors, _Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’06, page 217–224, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2006. AUAI Press.  ISBN 0974903922.
  * Hunt et al. [1998] J. C. R. Hunt, A. A. Wray, and P. Moin.  Eddies, streams, and convergence zones in turbulent flows.  _Center for Turbulence Research (CTR) Proceedings of Summer Program_ , 1998.
  * Hyman et al. [2012] J. M. Hyman, L. Ma, E. Balaguer-Ballester, D. Durstewitz, and J. K. Seamans.  Contextual encoding by ensembles of medial prefrontal cortex neurons.  _Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A._ , 109(13):5086–5091, Mar. 2012.
  * Hyttinen et al. [2012] A. Hyttinen, F. Eberhardt, and P. O. Hoyer.  Learning linear cyclic causal models with latent variables.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 13(109):3387–3439, 2012.
  * Hyvärinen et al. [2004] A. Hyvärinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja.  _Independent Component Analysis_.  Adaptive and Cognitive Dynamic Systems: Signal Processing, Learning, Communications and Control. Wiley, 2004.  ISBN 9780471464198.
  * Hyvärinen et al. [2008] A. Hyvärinen, S. Shimizu, and P. O. Hoyer.  Causal modelling combining instantaneous and lagged effects: An identifiable model based on non-Gaussianity.  In _Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning_ , pages 424–431, 2008.
  * Hyvärinen et al. [2010] A. Hyvärinen, K. Zhang, S. Shimizu, and P. O. Hoyer.  Estimation of a structural vector autoregression model using non-Gaussianity.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 11(May):1709–1731, 2010.
  * Imbens and Rubin [2015] G. W. Imbens and D. B. Rubin.  _Causal inference in statistics, social, and biomedical sciences_.  Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  * Jansen and Held [2014] M. F. Jansen and I. M. Held.  Parameterizing subgrid-scale eddy effects using energetically consistent backscatter.  _Ocean Modelling_ , 80:36–48, 2014.
  * Janzing [2007] D. Janzing.  On causally asymmetric versions of Occam’s Razor and their relation to thermodynamics.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:0708.3411_ , 2007.
  * Jiménez [2012] J. Jiménez.  Cascades in wall-bounded turbulence.  _Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech._ , 44:27–45, 2012.
  * Jiménez [2016] J. Jiménez.  Optimal fluxes and Reynolds stresses.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 809:585–600, 2016.
  * Jiménez [2018a] J. Jiménez.  Machine-aided turbulence theory.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 854:R1, 2018a.
  * Jiménez [2018b] J. Jiménez.  Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 842:P1, 2018b.
  * Johnson et al. [2007] H. Johnson, G. Harris, and K. Williams.  BRAINSFit: Mutual information registrations of whole-brain 3D images, using the Insight Toolkit.  _The Insight Journal_ , 2007.
  * Johnson et al. [2018] J. E. Johnson, V. Laparra, and G. Camps-Valls.  Disentangling derivatives, uncertainty and error in Gaussian process models.  In _IGARSS 2018 - 2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium_ , pages 4051–4054, July 2018.
  * Johnson-Laird and Byrne [1991] P. N. Johnson-Laird and R. M. Byrne.  _Deduction_.  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1991.
  * Juang and Pappa [1985] J. Juang and R. Pappa.  An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction.  _J. Guid. Control Dyn._ , 8:620, 1985.
  * Jung et al. [2010] M. Jung, M. Reichstein, P. Ciais, S. I. Seneviratne, J. Sheffield, M. L. Goulden, G. Bonan, A. Cescatti, J. Chen, R. De Jeu, et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply.  _Nature_ , 467(7318):951–954, 2010.
  * Kaddour et al. [2022] J. Kaddour, A. Lynch, Q. Liu, M. J. Kusner, and R. Silva.  Causal machine learning: A survey and open problems.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.15475_ , 2022.
  * Kaheman et al. [2022] K. Kaheman, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz.  Automatic differentiation to simultaneously identify nonlinear dynamics and extract noise probability distributions from data.  _Machine Learning: Science and Technology_ , 3(1):015031, Mar. 2022.  Publisher: IOP Publishing.
  * Kaiser et al. [2020] E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton.  Data-driven approximations of dynamical systems operators for control.  In _The Koopman Operator in Systems and Control_ , pages 197–234. Springer, 2020.
  * Kaiser et al. [2021a] E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton.  Data-driven discovery of Koopman eigenfunctions for control.  _Machine Learning: Science and Technology_ , 2(3):035023, June 2021a.
  * Kaiser et al. [2021b] E. Kaiser, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton.  Data-driven discovery of Koopman eigenfunctions for control.  _Machine Learning: Science and Technology_ , 2(3):035023, 2021b.
  * Kalisch and Bühlman [2007] M. Kalisch and P. Bühlman.  Estimating high-dimensional directed acyclic graphs with the PC-algorithm.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 8(3), 2007.
  * Kallenberg [2005] O. Kallenberg.  _Probabilistic symmetries and invariance principles_ , volume 9.  Springer, 2005.
  * Kalnay et al. [1996] E. Kalnay, M. Kanamitsu, R. Kistler, W. Collins, D. Deaven, L. Gandin, M. Iredell, S. Saha, G. White, J. Woollen, et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project.  _Bulletin of the American meteorological Society_ , 77(3):437–472, 1996.
  * Kemeth et al. [2022] F. Kemeth, T. Bertalan, T. Thiem, F. Dietrich, S. Moon, C. Laing, and Y. Kevrekidis.  Learning emergent partial differential equations in a learned emergent space.  _Nature Communications_ , 13, 06 2022.
  * Keynes [2013] J. M. Keynes.  _A treatise on probability_.  Courier Corporation, 2013.
  * Khodkar et al. [2019] M. Khodkar, P. Hassanzadeh, and A. Antoulas.  A Koopman-based framework for forecasting the spatiotemporal evolution of chaotic dynamics with nonlinearities modeled as exogenous forcings.  _Preprint arXiv:1909.00076_ , 2019.
  * Kim et al. [1971] H. T. Kim, S. J. Kline, and W. C. Reynolds.  The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 50:133–160, 1971.
  * Kim et al. [2021] S. Kim, P. Y. Lu, S. Mukherjee, M. Gilbert, L. Jing, V. Čeperić, and M. Soljačić.  Integration of Neural Network-Based Symbolic Regression in Deep Learning for Scientific Discovery.  _IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems_ , 32(9):4166–4177, 2021.
  * King et al. [2004] R. King, P. Langley, and H. Simon.  Automated Discovery in the Biological Sciences.  _AI Magazine_ , 25(3):21–36, 2004.
  * King et al. [2009] R. D. King, J. Rowland, W. Aubrey, M. Liakata, M. Markham, L. N. Soldatova, K. E. Whelan, A. Clare, M. Young, A. Sparkes, et al.  The robot scientist Adam.  _Computer_ , 42(8):46–54, 2009.
  * Klahr and Simon [1999] D. Klahr and H. A. Simon.  Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings.  _Psychological Bulletin_ , 125(5):524, 1999.
  * Kline et al. [1967] S. J. Kline, W. C. Reynolds, F. A. Schraub, and P. W. Runstadler.  The structure of turbulent boundary layers.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 30:741–773, 1967.
  * Klus et al. [2016] S. Klus, P. Koltai, and C. Schütte.  On the numerical approximation of the Perron–Frobenius and Koopman operator.  _Journal of Computational Dynamics_ , 3:51–79, 2016.
  * Klus et al. [2018] S. Klus, F. Nüske, P. Koltai, H. Wu, I. Kevrekidis, C. Schütte, and F. Noé.  Data-driven model reduction and transfer operator approximation.  _Journal of Nonlinear Science_ , 1010:9437–7, 2018.
  * Klus et al. [2020] S. Klus, I. Schuster, and K. Muandet.  Eigendecompositions of transfer operators in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces.  _Journal of Nonlinear Science_ , 30(1):283–315, 2020.
  * Kocabas [1991] A. Kocabas.  A Genetic Programming System for Automated Discovery in the Physical Sciences.  _Machine Learning_ , 7(3-4):295–314, 1991.
  * Koch [2004] C. Koch.  _Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons (Computational Neuroscience Series)_.  Oxford University Press, Inc., Usa, 2004.  ISBN 0195181999.
  * Kokar [1986] M. Kokar.  Knowledge acquisition: A realization of new artificial intelligence.  _Artificial Intelligence_ , 32:251–290, 1986.
  * Kolmogorov [1963] A. N. Kolmogorov.  On tables of random numbers.  _Sankhyā: The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A_ , pages 369–376, 1963.
  * Kommenda et al. [2020] M. Kommenda, B. Burlacu, G. Kronberger, and M. Affenzeller.  Parameter identification for symbolic regression using nonlinear least squares.  _Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines_ , 21(3):471–501, 2020.
  * Koppe et al. [2019] G. Koppe, H. Toutounji, P. Kirsch, S. Lis, and D. Durstewitz.  Identifying nonlinear dynamical systems via generative recurrent neural networks with applications to fMRI.  _PLOS Computational Biology_ , 15(8):1–35, 08 2019.
  * Koster et al. [2004] R. D. Koster, P. A. Dirmeyer, Z. Guo, G. Bonan, E. Chan, P. Cox, C. Gordon, S. Kanae, E. Kowalczyk, D. Lawrence, et al.  Regions of strong coupling between soil moisture and precipitation.  _Science_ , 305(5687):1138–1140, 2004.
  * Koster et al. [2006] R. D. Koster, Y. Sud, Z. Guo, P. A. Dirmeyer, G. Bonan, K. W. Oleson, E. Chan, D. Verseghy, P. Cox, H. Davies, et al.  GLACE: the global land–atmosphere coupling experiment. Part I: overview.  _Journal of Hydrometeorology_ , 7(4):590–610, 2006.
  * Kostic et al. [2022] V. Kostic, P. Novelli, A. Maurer, C. Ciliberto, L. Rosasco, and M. Pontil.  Learning dynamical systems via Koopman operator regression in reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces.  In _NeurIPS 2022_ , pages 1–9, 2022.
  * Kotz and Drouet [2001] S. Kotz and D. Drouet.  _Correlation and dependence_.  World Scientific, 2001.
  * Koza et al. [2001] J. Koza, F. Bennett, D. Andre, and M. Keane.  Nonlinear Genetic Programming: Automatic Discovery of Reusable Programs.  _Machine Learning_ , 42(1):185–223, 2001.
  * Koza [1990] J. R. Koza.  Genetic Programming: A Paradigm for Genetically Breeding Populations of Computer Programs to Solve Problems.  Technical report, Dept. of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 1990.
  * Koza [1992] J. R. Koza.  Genetic programming: On the programming of computers by means of natural selection.  _MIT Press_ , 1992.
  * Koza [1994] J. R. Koza.  Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection.  _Statistics and computing_ , 4(2):87–112, 1994\.
  * Kretschmer et al. [2016] M. Kretschmer, D. Coumou, J. F. Donges, and J. Runge.  Using causal effect networks to analyze different Arctic drivers of midlatitude winter circulation.  _Journal of climate_ , 29(11):4069–4081, 2016\.
  * Kretschmer et al. [2017] M. Kretschmer, J. Runge, and D. Coumou.  Early prediction of extreme stratospheric polar vortex states based on causal precursors.  _Geophysical research letters_ , 44(16):8592–8600, 2017.
  * Krich et al. [2020] C. Krich, J. Runge, D. G. Miralles, M. Migliavacca, O. Perez-Priego, T. El-Madany, A. Carrara, and M. D. Mahecha.  Estimating causal networks in biosphere–atmosphere interaction with the PCMCI approach.  _Biogeosciences_ , 17(4):1033–1061, 2020.
  * Krich et al. [2021] C. Krich, M. Migliavacca, D. G. Miralles, G. Kraemer, T. S. El-Madany, M. Reichstein, J. Runge, and M. D. Mahecha.  Functional convergence of biosphere–atmosphere interactions in response to meteorological conditions.  _Biogeosciences_ , 18(7):2379–2404, 2021.
  * Kronberger et al. [2022] G. Kronberger, F. O. de Franca, B. Burlacu, C. Haider, and M. Kommenda.  Shape-constrained symbolic regression—Improving extrapolation with prior knowledge.  _Evolutionary Computation_ , 30(1):75–98, 03 2022\.
  * Kuhn [1962] T. S. Kuhn.  _The Structure of Scientific Revolutions_.  University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  * Kutz et al. [2016] J. Kutz, S. Brunton, B. Brunton, and J. Proctor.  Dynamic mode decomposition: Data-driven modeling of complex systems.  _Siam_ , 2016.
  * Kwapień and Drożdż [2012] J. Kwapień and S. Drożdż.  Physical approach to complex systems.  _Physics Reports_ , 515(3-4):115–226, 2012.
  * Lachapelle et al. [2020] S. Lachapelle, P. Brouillard, T. Deleu, and S. Lacoste-Julien.  Gradient-Based Neural DAG Learning.  In _International Conference on Learning Representations_ , 2020.
  * Landahl and Landahlt [1975] M. T. Landahl and M. T. Landahlt.  Wave breakdown and turbulence.  _SIAM J. Appl. Maths_ , 28:735–756, 1975.
  * Langley [2019] P. Langley.  Scientific discovery, causal explanation, and process model induction.  _Mind & Society_, 18(1):43–56, 2019.
  * Langley et al. [1987a] P. Langley, H. Simon, and G. Bradshaw.  Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative process.  _AI Magazine_ , 8(3):30–44, 1987a.
  * Langley et al. [1987b] P. Langley, H. A. Simon, G. L. Bradshaw, and J. M. Zytkow.  _Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes_.  MIT press, 1987b.
  * Langley et al. [2002a] P. Langley, H. Simon, and G. Bradshaw.  Automated discovery in the Physical Sciences.  _AI Magazine_ , 23(3):11– 28, 2002a.
  * Langley et al. [2002b] P. Langley, H. Simon, and G. Bradshaw.  Scientific discovery and the future of AI.  _AI Magazine_ , 23(3):29–39, 2002b.
  * Lapish et al. [2015] C. C. Lapish, E. Balaguer-Ballester, J. K. Seamans, A. G. Phillips, and D. Durstewitz.  Amphetamine Exerts Dose-Dependent Changes in Prefrontal Cortex Attractor Dynamics during Working Memory.  _Journal of Neuroscience_ , 35(28):10172–10187. EB–B and CCL contributed equally., 2015.
  * Lazpita et al. [2022] E. Lazpita, A. Martínez-Sánchez, A. Corrochano, S. Hoyas, S. Le Clainche, and R. Vinuesa.  On the generation and destruction mechanisms of arch vortices in urban fluid flows.  _Phys. Fluids_ , 34:051702, 2022.
  * Le Clainche and Vega [2017] S. Le Clainche and J. M. Vega.  Higher Order Dynamic Mode Decomposition.  _SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst._ , 16:882–925, 2017.
  * Lee and Zaki [2018] J. Lee and T. A. Zaki.  Detection algorithm for turbulent interfaces and large-scale structures in intermittent flows.  _Comput. Fluids_ , 175(1):142–158, 2018.
  * Lee and Carlberg [2020] K. Lee and K. T. Carlberg.  Model reduction of dynamical systems on nonlinear manifolds using deep convolutional autoencoders.  _J. Comput. Phys._ , 404:108973, 2020.
  * LeRoy [2004] S. LeRoy.  _Causality in economics_.  London School of Economics, Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, 2004.
  * Lin and Oettel [2019] S.-C. Lin and M. Oettel.  A classical density functional from machine learning and a convolutional neural network.  _SciPost Phys._ , 6:025, 2019.
  * Lin et al. [2020] S.-C. Lin, G. Martius, and M. Oettel.  Analytical classical density functionals from an equation learning network.  _The Journal of Chemical Physics_ , 152(2):021102, 2020.
  * Lindley [2013] D. V. Lindley.  _Understanding uncertainty_.  John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
  * Ljung and Glad [1994] L. Ljung and T. Glad.  On global identifiability for arbitrary model parametrizations.  _Automatica_ , 30(2):265–276, 1994.
  * Lohmann et al. [2012] G. Lohmann, K. Erfurth, K. Müller, and R. Turner.  Critical comments on dynamic causal modelling.  _NeuroImage_ , 59(3):2322–2329, 2012.
  * Loiseau [2020] J.-C. Loiseau.  Data-driven modeling of the chaotic thermal convection in an annular thermosyphon.  _Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn._ , 34(4):339–365, 2020\.
  * Long et al. [2019] Z. Long, Y. Lu, and B. Dong.  PDE-Net 2.0: Learning PDEs from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network.  _Journal of Computational Physics_ , 399:108925, Dec. 2019\.
  * Louizos et al. [2018] C. Louizos, M. Welling, and D. P. Kingma.  Learning Sparse Neural Networks through $L_{0}$ Regularization.  In _International Conference on Learning Representations_ , 2018.
  * Lozano-Durán and Jiménez [2014] A. Lozano-Durán and J. Jiménez.  Time-resolved evolution of coherent structures in turbulent channels: characterization of eddies and cascades.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 759:432–471, 2014.
  * Lozano-Durán et al. [2012] A. Lozano-Durán, O. Flores, and J. Jiménez.  The three-dimensional structure of momentum transfer in turbulent channels.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 694:100–130, 2012.
  * Lozano-Durán et al. [2020] A. Lozano-Durán, H. J. Bae, and M. P. Encinar.  Causality of energy-containing eddies in wall turbulence.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 882:A2, 2020.
  * Lu and Willmarth [1973] S. S. Lu and W. W. Willmarth.  Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 60:481–511, 1973.
  * Ludescher et al. [2021] J. Ludescher, M. Martin, N. Boers, A. Bunde, C. Ciemer, J. Fan, S. Havlin, M. Kretschmer, J. Kurths, J. Runge, et al.  Network-based forecasting of climate phenomena.  _Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences_ , 118(47):e1922872118, 2021.
  * Lueckmann et al. [2017] J.-M. Lueckmann, P. J. Gonçalves, G. Bassetto, K. Öcal, M. Nonnenmacher, and J. H. Macke.  Flexible Statistical Inference for Mechanistic Models of Neural Dynamics.  In _Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems_ , NIPS’17, page 1289–1299, Red Hook, NY, USA, 2017. Curran Associates Inc.  ISBN 9781510860964.
  * Lumley [1967] J. L. Lumley.  The structure of inhomogeneous turbulence.  _Atmospheric turbulence and wave propagation, A. M. Yaglom and V. I. Tatarski (eds). Nauka, Moscow_ , pages 166–178, 1967.
  * Lun-Chau et al. [2022] S. Lun-Chau, R. Hu, J. Gonzalez, and D. Sejdinovic.  RKHS-SHAP: Shapley values for kernel methods.  _Preprint arXiv:2110.09167v2_ , 2022.
  * Lungarella et al. [2007] M. Lungarella, A. Pitti, and Y. Kuniyoshi.  Information transfer at multiple scales.  _Physical Review E_ , 76(5):056117, 2007.
  * Lusch et al. [2018] B. Lusch, J. N. Kutz, and S. L. Brunton.  Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamics.  _Nature Communications_ , 9(1), 2018.
  * M. Mooij and Claassen [2020] J. M. Mooij and T. Claassen.  Constraint-Based Causal Discovery using Partial Ancestral Graphs in the presence of Cycles.  In J. Peters and D. Sontag, editors, _Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI)_ , volume 124 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 1159–1168. Pmlr, 03–06 Aug 2020.
  * Madani et al. [2020] N. Madani, N. C. Parazoo, J. S. Kimball, A. P. Ballantyne, R. H. Reichle, M. Maneta, S. Saatchi, P. I. Palmer, Z. Liu, and T. Tagesson.  Recent amplified global gross primary productivity due to temperature increase is offset by reduced productivity due to water constraints.  _AGU Advances_ , 1(4):e2020AV000180, 2020.
  * Malinsky and Spirtes [2018] D. Malinsky and P. Spirtes.  Causal structure learning from multivariate time series in settings with unmeasured confounding.  In T. D. Le, K. Zhang, E. Kıcıman, A. Hyvärinen, and L. Liu, editors, _Proceedings of 2018 ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Causal Disocvery_ , volume 92 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 23–47, London, UK, 20 Aug 2018. PMLR.
  * Maraun et al. [2017] D. Maraun, T. G. Shepherd, M. Widmann, G. Zappa, D. Walton, J. M. Gutiérrez, S. Hagemann, I. Richter, P. M. Soares, A. Hall, et al.  Towards process-informed bias correction of climate change simulations.  _Nature Climate Change_ , 7(11):764–773, 2017\.
  * Marinazzo et al. [2008a] D. Marinazzo, M. Pellicoro, and S. Stramaglia.  Kernel-Granger causality and the analysis of dynamical networks.  _Physical review E_ , 77(5):056215, 2008a.
  * Marinazzo et al. [2008b] D. Marinazzo, M. Pellicoro, and S. Stramaglia.  Kernel method for nonlinear Granger causality.  _Phys. Rev. Lett._ , 100:144103, Apr. 2008b.
  * Marini and Singer [1988] M. M. Marini and B. Singer.  Causality in the social sciences.  _Sociological methodology_ , 18:347–409, 1988.
  * Marreiros et al. [2010] A. C. Marreiros, K. E. Stephan, and K. J. Friston.  Dynamic causal modeling.  _Scholarpedia_ , 5(7):9568, 2010.
  * Marshall and Adcroft [2010] D. P. Marshall and A. J. Adcroft.  Parameterization of ocean eddies: Potential vorticity mixing, energetics and arnold’s first stability theorem.  _Ocean Modelling_ , 32(3-4):188–204, 2010.
  * Martínez-Sánchez et al. [2022] A. Martínez-Sánchez, E. López, S. Le Clainche, A. Lozano-Durán, A. Srivastava, and R. Vinuesa.  Causality analysis of large-scale structures in the flow around a wall-mounted square cylinder.  _Preprint arXiv:2209.15356_ , 2022.
  * Martínez-Sánchez et al. [2023] A. Martínez-Sánchez, E. Lazpita, A. Corrochano, S. Le Clainche, S. Hoyas, and R. Vinuesa.  Data-driven assessment of arch vortices in urban flows.  _Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, To Appear. Preprint arXiv:2202.01667v1_ , 2023.
  * Martius and Lampert [2016] G. Martius and C. H. Lampert.  Extrapolation and learning equations, 2016.  https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02995.
  * Mattia and Del Giudice [2002] M. Mattia and P. Del Giudice.  Population dynamics of interacting spiking neurons.  _Phys. Rev. E_ , 66:051917, Nov. 2002.
  * Mattia et al. [2019] M. Mattia, M. Biggio, A. Galluzzi, and M. Storace.  Dimensional reduction in networks of non-Markovian spiking neurons: Equivalence of synaptic filtering and heterogeneous propagation delays.  _PLOS Computational Biology_ , 15(10):1–35, Oct. 2019.
  * May [1972] R. M. May.  Will a large complex system be stable?  _Nature_ , 238(5364):413–414, 1972.
  * McConaghy [2011] T. McConaghy.  FFX: Fast, scalable, deterministic symbolic regression technology.  In _Genetic Programming Theory and Practice IX_ , Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, chapter 13, pages 235–260. Springer, Ann Arbor, USA, 2011.
  * McDavid et al. [2019] A. McDavid, R. Gottardo, N. Simon, and M. Drton.  Graphical models for zero-inflated single cell gene expression.  _The annals of applied statistics_ , 13(2):848, 2019.
  * McGibbon and Pande [2015] R. T. McGibbon and V. S. Pande.  Variational cross-validation of slow dynamical modes in molecular kinetics.  _The Journal of Chemical Physics_ , 142, 2015.
  * McKnight et al. [2007] P. E. McKnight, K. M. McKnight, S. Sidani, and A. J. Figueredo.  _Missing data: A gentle introduction_.  Guilford Press, 2007.
  * Medaglia et al. [2015] J. D. Medaglia, M.-E. Lynall, and D. S. Bassett.  Cognitive network neuroscience.  _Journal of cognitive neuroscience_ , 27(8):1471–1491, 2015.
  * Meek [1995] C. Meek.  Causal inference and causal explanation with background knowledge.  In _Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’95, page 403–410, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995\. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.  ISBN 1558603859.
  * Meek [1997] C. Meek.  _Graphical models: Selecting causal and statistical models_.  PhD thesis, Carnegie Mellon University., 1997.
  * Mehler and Kording [2018] D. M. A. Mehler and K. P. Kording.  The lure of causal statements: Rampant mis-inference of causality in estimated connectivity, 2018.
  * Meneveau and Katz [2000] C. Meneveau and J. Katz.  Scale-invariance and turbulence models for large-eddy simulation.  _Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics_ , 32(1):1–32, 2000.
  * Menzly et al. [2004] L. Menzly, T. Santos, and P. Veronesi.  Understanding predictability.  _Journal of Political Economy_ , 112(1):1–47, 2004.
  * Meyer-Lindenberg et al. [2005] A. S. Meyer-Lindenberg, R. K. Olsen, P. D. Kohn, T. Brown, M. F. Egan, D. R. Weinberger, and K. F. Berman.  Regionally Specific Disturbance of Dorsolateral Prefrontal–Hippocampal Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia.  _Archives of General Psychiatry_ , 62(4):379–386, 04 2005.
  * Mezić [2005] I. Mezić.  Spectral properties of dynamical systems, model reduction and decompositions.  _Nonlinear Dynamics_ , 41(1):309–325, 2005.
  * Milano and Koumoutsakos [2002] M. Milano and P. Koumoutsakos.  Neural network modeling for near wall turbulent flow.  _J. Comput. Phys._ , 182:1–26, 2002.
  * Milly [1992] P. Milly.  Potential evaporation and soil moisture in general circulation models.  _Journal of climate_ , 5(3):209–226, 1992.
  * Moehlis et al. [2004] J. Moehlis, H. Faisst, and B. Eckhardt.  A low-dimensional model for turbulent shear flows.  _New J. Phys._ , 6:56, 2004.
  * Mogensen [2022] S. W. Mogensen.  Equality Constraints in Linear Hawkes Processes.  In B. Schölkopf, C. Uhler, and K. Zhang, editors, _Proceedings of the First Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning_ , volume 177 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 576–593. Pmlr, 11–13 Apr 2022.
  * Mogensen and Hansen [2020] S. W. Mogensen and N. R. Hansen.  Markov equivalence of marginalized local independence graphs.  _The Annals of Statistics_ , 48(1):539–559, 2020\.
  * Mogensen et al. [2018] S. W. Mogensen, D. Malinsky, and N. R. Hansen.  Causal Learning for Partially Observed Stochastic Dynamical Systems.  In _Thirty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence_. AUAI Press Corvallis, Oregon, 2018.
  * Monnier et al. [2010] B. Monnier, B. Neiswander, and C. Wark.  Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements in an urban type boundary layer: Insight into flow regimes and incidence angle effect.  _Boundary-Layer Meteorol._ , 135:243––268, 2010.
  * Mønster et al. [2017] D. Mønster, R. Fusaroli, K. Tylén, A. Roepstorff, and J. F. Sherson.  Causal inference from noisy time-series data—Testing the convergent cross-mapping algorithm in the presence of noise and external influence.  _Future Generation Computer Systems_ , 73:52–62, 2017.
  * Montbrió et al. [2015] E. Montbrió, D. Pazó, and A. Roxin.  Macroscopic description for networks of spiking neurons.  _Phys. Rev. X_ , 5:021028, June 2015.
  * Monti et al. [2020] R. P. Monti, l. Khemakhem, and A. Hyvarinen.  Autoregressive flow-based causal discovery and inference.  _arXiv preprint: 2007.09390_ , 07 2020.
  * Mooij et al. [2009] J. Mooij, D. Janzing, J. Peters, and B. Schölkopf.  Regression by dependence minimization and its application to causal inference in additive noise models.  In _Proceedings of the 26th annual international conference on machine learning_ , pages 745–752, 2009.
  * Mooij et al. [2013a] J. M. Mooij, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  From ordinary differential equations to structural causal models: The deterministic case.  In _Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’13, page 440–448, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2013a. AUAI Press.
  * Mooij et al. [2013b] J. M. Mooij, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  From Ordinary Differential Equations to Structural Causal Models: the deterministic case.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7920_ , 2013b.
  * Mooij et al. [2016] J. M. Mooij, J. Peters, D. Janzing, J. Zscheischler, and B. Schölkopf.  Distinguishing cause from effect using observational data: methods and benchmarks.  _The Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 17(1):1103–1204, 2016.
  * Mooij et al. [2020] J. M. Mooij, S. Magliacane, and T. Claassen.  Joint Causal Inference from Multiple Contexts.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 21(99):1–108, 2020.
  * Moraffah et al. [2021] R. Moraffah, P. Sheth, M. Karami, A. Bhattacharya, Q. Wang, A. Tahir, A. Raglin, and H. Liu.  Causal inference for time series analysis: Problems, methods and evaluation.  _Knowledge and Information Systems_ , 63:3041–3085, 2021\.
  * Morgan and Winship [2015] S. L. Morgan and C. Winship.  _Counterfactuals and causal inference_.  Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  * Moulet [1992] P. Moulet.  Learning Rules from Structured Data.  _Machine Learning_ , 8(1):47–75, 1992.
  * Munz [2014] P. Munz.  _Our knowledge of the growth of knowledge: Popper or Wittgenstein?_ Routledge, 2014.
  * Murata and Tanaka [1994] T. Murata and K. Tanaka.  A Constructive Induction Algorithm Incorporating Prior Knowledge.  _Machine Learning_ , 14(1):71–96, 1994.
  * Murata et al. [2020] T. Murata, K. Fukami, and K. Fukagata.  Nonlinear mode decomposition with convolutional neural networks for fluid dynamics.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 882:A13, 2020.
  * Ness et al. [2017] R. O. Ness, K. Sachs, P. Mallick, and O. Vitek.  A Bayesian active learning experimental design for inferring signaling networks.  In _Research in Computational Molecular Biology: 21st Annual International Conference, RECOMB 2017, Hong Kong, China, May 3-7, 2017, Proceedings 21_ , pages 134–156. Springer, 2017.
  * Neumann et al. [2023] W.-J. Neumann, A. Horn, and A. A. Kühn.  Insights and opportunities for deep brain stimulation as a brain circuit intervention, 2023.
  * Newton [1833] I. Newton.  _Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica_ , volume 1.  G. Brookman, 1833.
  * Ng et al. [2020] I. Ng, A. Ghassami, and K. Zhang.  On the Role of Sparsity and DAG Constraints for Learning Linear DAGs.  In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 33, pages 17943–17954. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  * Ng et al. [2022] I. Ng, S. Lachapelle, N. Rosemary Ke, S. Lacoste-Julien, and K. Zhang.  On the Convergence of Continuous Constrained Optimization for Structure Learning.  In G. Camps-Valls, F. J. R. Ruiz, and I. Valera, editors, _Proceedings of The 25th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics_ , volume 151 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 8176–8198. Pmlr, 28–30 Mar 2022.
  * Nieh et al. [2021] E. Nieh, M. Schottdorf, N. Freeman, R. Low, S. Lewallen, S. Koay, L. Pinto, J. Gauthier, C. Brody, and D. Tank.  Geometry of abstract learned knowledge in the hippocampus.  _Nature_ , 595(7865):80–84, July 2021.  doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03652-7.
  * Niemeijer and de Groot [2008] D. Niemeijer and R. S. de Groot.  Framing environmental indicators: moving from causal chains to causal networks.  _Environment, development and sustainability_ , 10(1):89–106, 2008.
  * Noack et al. [2003] B. R. Noack, K. Afanasiev, M. Morzynski, G. Tadmor, and F. Thiele.  A hierarchy of low-dimensional models for the transient and post-transient cylinder wake.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 497:335–363, 2003.
  * Noé and Nüske [2013] F. Noé and F. Nüske.  A variational approach to modeling slow processes in stochastic dynamical systems.  _Multiscale Modeling & Simulation_, 11:635–655, 2013\.
  * Nordhausen and Langley [1990] K. Nordhausen and P. Langley.  Inverse Entailment and Progol.  _Machine Learning_ , 5(1):25–38, 1990.
  * Nowack et al. [2020] P. Nowack, J. Runge, V. Eyring, and J. D. Haigh.  Causal networks for climate model evaluation and constrained projections.  _Nature communications_ , 11(1):1–11, 2020.
  * Nüske et al. [2014] F. Nüske, B. G. Keller, G. Pérez-Hernández, A. S. J. S. Mey, and F. Noé.  Variational approach to molecular kinetics.  _Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation_ , 10:1739–1752, 2014.
  * Observatory [2020] M. L. Observatory.  https://www.climate.gov/teaching/resources/atmospheric-co2-mauna-loa-observatory, 2020\.
  * Olver [1999] P. J. Olver.  _Classical Invariant Theory_.  London Mathematical Society Student Texts. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  * Orr [1907] W. M. Orr.  The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. Part II. A viscous liquid.  _Math. Proc. R. Irish Acad._ , 27:69–138, 1907.
  * Pamfil et al. [2020] R. Pamfil, N. Sriwattanaworachai, S. Desai, P. Pilgerstorfer, K. Georgatzis, P. Beaumont, and B. Aragam.  DYNOTEARS: Structure Learning from Time-Series Data.  In S. Chiappa and R. Calandra, editors, _Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics_ , volume 108 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 1595–1605. Pmlr, 26–28 Aug 2020.
  * Pandarinath et al. [2018] C. Pandarinath, D. O’Shea, J. Collins, R. Jozefowicz, S. Stavisky, J. Kao, E. Trautmann, M. Kaufman, S. Ryu, L. Hochberg, J. Henderson, K. Shenoy, L. Abbott, and D. Sussillo.  Inferring single-trial neural population dynamics using sequential auto-encoders.  _Nature Methods_ , 15, 10 2018.  doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0109-9.
  * Pearl [1988] J. Pearl.  _Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference_.  Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 1988.  ISBN 0934613737.
  * Pearl [1995] J. Pearl.  Causal diagrams for empirical research.  _Biometrika_ , 82(4):669–688, 1995.
  * Pearl [2009a] J. Pearl.  _Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference_.  Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2009a.  ISBN 052189560x, 9780521895606.
  * Pearl [2009b] J. Pearl.  Causal inference in statistics: An overview.  _Stat. Surv._ , 3:96–146, 2009b.
  * Pearl [2009c] J. Pearl.  _Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference_.  Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2nd edition, 2009c.
  * Pearl [2011] J. Pearl.  Statistics and Causality: Separated to Reunite—Commentary on Bryan Dowd’s “Separated at Birth”.  _Health Services Research_ , 46(2):421–429, 2011\.
  * Pearl and Mackenzie [2018] J. Pearl and D. Mackenzie.  _The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect_.  Basic books, New York, 2018.
  * Pearl et al. [2016] J. Pearl, M. Glymour, and N. P. Jewell.  _Causal inference in statistics: A Primer_.  John Wiley & Sons, 2016.  ISBN 1935-7516.
  * Penny et al. [2004] W. D. Penny, K. E. Stephan, A. Mechelli, and K. J. Friston.  Comparing dynamic causal models.  _Neuroimage_ , 22(3):1157–1172, 2004.
  * Penny et al. [2010] W. D. Penny, K. E. Stephan, J. Daunizeau, M. J. Rosa, K. J. Friston, T. M. Schofield, and A. P. Leff.  Comparing families of dynamic causal models.  _PLoS computational biology_ , 6(3):e1000709, 2010\.
  * Pérez-Suay and Camps-Valls [2019] A. Pérez-Suay and G. Camps-Valls.  Causal Inference in Geoscience and Remote Sensing from Observational Data.  _IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing_ , 57(3):1502–1513, 2019.
  * Peters et al. [2011] J. Peters, J. M. Mooij, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  Identifiability of Causal Graphs Using Functional Models.  In _Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’11, page 589–598, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2011. AUAI Press.  ISBN 9780974903972.
  * Peters et al. [2013] J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  Causal Inference on Time Series using Restricted Structural Equation Models.  In C. Burges, L. Bottou, M. Welling, Z. Ghahramani, and K. Weinberger, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 26. Curran Associates, Inc., 2013.
  * Peters et al. [2016] J. Peters, P. Bühlmann, and N. Meinshausen.  Causal inference by using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervals.  _Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)_ , 78(5):947–1012, 2016.
  * Peters et al. [2017a] J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  _Elements of Causal Inference: Foundations and Learning Algorithms_.  MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017a.
  * Peters et al. [2017b] J. Peters, D. Janzing, and B. Schölkopf.  _Elements of causal inference: foundations and learning algorithms_.  The MIT Press, 2017b.
  * Peters et al. [2022] J. Peters, S. Bauer, and N. Pfister.  _Causal Models for Dynamical Systems_ , page 671–690.  Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1 edition, 2022\.  ISBN 9781450395861.
  * Peters [2012] J. M. Peters.  _Restricted structural equation models for causal inference_.  PhD thesis, ETH Zurich and MPI for Intelligent Systems, 2012.
  * Petersen et al. [2021] B. K. Petersen, M. L. Larma, T. N. Mundhenk, C. P. Santiago, S. K. Kim, and J. T. Kim.  Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradients.  In _International Conference on Learning Representations_ , 2021.
  * Petersen and Hansen [2021] L. Petersen and N. R. Hansen.  Testing Conditional Independence via Quantile Regression Based Partial Copulas.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 22(70):1–47, 2021.
  * Pfister et al. [2019] N. Pfister, P. Bühlmann, and J. Peters.  Invariant causal prediction for sequential data.  _Journal of the American Statistical Association_ , 114(527):1264–1276, 2019.
  * Pope [2000] S. B. Pope.  Turbulent Flows.  _Cambridge University Press_ , 2000.
  * Popper [2005] K. Popper.  _The logic of scientific discovery_.  Routledge, 2005.
  * Potthast [2013] R. Potthast.  _Amari Model_ , pages 1–6.  Springer New York, New York, NY, 2013.  ISBN 978-1-4614-7320-6.
  * Praksova [2011] R. Praksova.  Eureqa: Software review.  _Genet. Program. Evol. M._ , 12(1):173–178, 2011\.
  * Press [1967] S. J. Press.  A compound events model for security prices.  _Journal of business_ , pages 317–335, 1967.
  * Pukrittayakamee et al. [2009] A. Pukrittayakamee, M. Malshe, M. Hagan, L. Raff, R. Narulkar, S. Bukkapatnum, and R. Komanduri.  Simultaneous fitting of a potential-energy surface and its corresponding force fields using feedforward neural networks.  _The Journal of chemical physics_ , 130(13):134101, 2009.
  * Quade et al. [2019] M. Quade, J. Gout, and M. Abel.  Glyph: Symbolic regression tools.  _Journal of Open Research Software_ , June 2019.
  * Rabinovich and Varona [2018] M. I. Rabinovich and P. Varona.  Discrete Sequential Information Coding: Heteroclinic Cognitive Dynamics.  _Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience_ , 12, 2018.
  * Rabinovich et al. [2008] M. I. Rabinovich, R. Huerta, P. Varona, and V. S. Afraimovich.  Transient Cognitive Dynamics, Metastability, and Decision Making.  _PLOS Computational Biology_ , 4(5):1–9, 05 2008\.
  * Raia [2008] F. Raia.  Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education.  _Journal of Geoscience Education_ , 56(1):81–94, 2008.
  * Ramsey et al. [2006] J. Ramsey, P. Spirtes, and J. Zhang.  Adjacency-Faithfulness and Conservative Causal Inference.  In _Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’06, page 401–408, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2006. AUAI Press.  ISBN 0974903922.
  * Ramsey et al. [2017] J. Ramsey, M. Glymour, R. Sanchez-Romero, and C. Glymour.  A million variables and more: the fast greedy equivalence search algorithm for learning high-dimensional graphical causal models, with an application to functional magnetic resonance images.  _International journal of data science and analytics_ , 3(2):121–129, 2017.
  * Rasmussen and Williams [2006] C. E. Rasmussen and C. K. I. Williams.  _Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning_.  The MIT Press, 2006.
  * Razi and Friston [2016] A. Razi and K. J. Friston.  The connected brain: causality, models, and intrinsic dynamics.  _IEEE Signal Processing Magazine_ , 33(3):14–35, 2016.
  * Reichenbach [1991] H. Reichenbach.  _The direction of time_ , volume 65.  Univ of California Press, 1991.
  * Reid et al. [2019] A. Reid, D. Headley, R. Mill, R. sanchez romero, L. Uddin, D. Marinazzo, D. Lurie, P. Valdés-Sosa, S. Hanson, B. Biswal, V. Calhoun, R. Poldrack, and M. Cole.  Advancing functional connectivity research from association to causation.  _Nature Neuroscience_ , 22:1–10, Oct. 2019.
  * Reisach et al. [2021] A. G. Reisach, C. Seiler, and S. Weichwald.  Beware of the Simulated DAG! Causal Discovery Benchmarks May Be Easy To Game.  In _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS)_ , 2021.
  * Reitsma [2010] F. Reitsma.  Geoscience explanations: Identifying what is needed for generating scientific narratives from data models.  _Environmental Modelling & Software_, 25(1):93–99, 2010.
  * Reynolds [1895] O. Reynolds.  On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion.  _Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A_ , 186:123–164, 1895.
  * Richardson [1996] T. Richardson.  A Discovery Algorithm for Directed Cyclic Graphs.  In _Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’96, page 454–461, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1996. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.  ISBN 155860412x.
  * Richardson and Spirtes [2002] T. Richardson and P. Spirtes.  Ancestral Graph Markov Models.  _The Annals of Statistics_ , 30(4):962–1030, 2002\.
  * Richiardi et al. [2013] J. Richiardi, S. Achard, H. Bunke, and D. Van De Ville.  Machine learning with brain graphs: predictive modeling approaches for functional imaging in systems neuroscience.  _IEEE Signal processing magazine_ , 30(3):58–70, 2013.
  * Rinaldo et al. [2019] A. Rinaldo, L. Wasserman, and M. G’Sell.  Bootstrapping and sample splitting for high-dimensional, assumption-lean inference.  _The Annals of Statistics_ , 47(6):3438–3469, 2019.
  * Robins et al. [2003] J. M. Robins, R. Scheines, P. Spirtes, and L. Wasserman.  Uniform consistency in causal inference.  _Biometrika_ , 90(3):491–515, 2003.
  * Robins and Hernan [2020] M. Robins and M. Hernan.  Causal inference: what if.  _Found Agnostic Stat_ , pages 235–281, 2020.
  * Rolinek et al. [2019] M. Rolinek, D. Zietlow, and G. Martius.  Variational Autoencoders Pursue PCA Directions (by Accident).  In _Proceedings IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)_ , pages 12406–12415, June 2019.
  * Ross et al. [2023] A. S. Ross, Z. Li, P. Perezhogin, C. Fernandez-Granda, and L. Zanna.  Benchmarking of machine learning ocean subgrid parameterizations in an idealized model.  _Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems_ , 15:e2022MS003258, 2023.
  * Ross [2015] L. N. Ross.  Dynamical Models and Explanation in Neuroscience.  _Philosophy of Science_ , 82(1):32–54, 2015\.
  * Rowley et al. [2009a] C. Rowley, I. Mezic, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. Henningson.  Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 641:115–127, 2009a.
  * Rowley and Dawson [2017] C. W. Rowley and S. T. Dawson.  Model reduction for flow analysis and control.  _Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech._ , 49:387–417, 2017.
  * Rowley et al. [2009b] C. W. Rowley, I. Mezić, S. Bagheri, P. Schlatter, and D. S. Henningson.  Spectral analysis of nonlinear flows.  _Journal of Fluid Mechanics_ , 641:115–127, 2009b.
  * Rubenstein et al. [2018] P. K. Rubenstein, B. Bongers, S. Bernhard, and J. M. Mooij.  From Deterministic ODEs to Dynamic Structural Causal Models.  In _Thirty-Fourth Conference on Uncertainty in Artifical Intelligence_. AUAI Press Corvallis, Oregon, 2018.
  * Runge [2015] J. Runge.  Quantifying information transfer and mediation along causal pathways in complex systems.  _Physical Review E_ , 92(6):062829, 2015.
  * Runge [2018] J. Runge.  Conditional independence testing based on a nearest-neighbor estimator of conditional mutual information.  In A. Storkey and F. Perez-Cruz, editors, _International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics_ , volume 84 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 938–947. Pmlr, 2018.
  * Runge [2020] J. Runge.  Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets.  In J. Peters and D. Sontag, editors, _Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI)_ , volume 124 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 1388–1397. Pmlr, 03–06 Aug 2020.
  * Runge [2021] J. Runge.  Necessary and sufficient graphical conditions for optimal adjustment sets in causal graphical models with hidden variables.  In M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (NeurIPS 2021)_ , 2021.
  * Runge et al. [2012] J. Runge, J. Heitzig, V. Petoukhov, and J. Kurths.  Escaping the Curse of Dimensionality in Estimating Multivariate Transfer Entropy.  _Physical Review Letters_ , 108:258701, June 2012.
  * Runge et al. [2014] J. Runge, V. Petoukhov, and J. Kurths.  Quantifying the strength and delay of climatic interactions: The ambiguities of cross correlation and a novel measure based on graphical models.  _Journal of climate_ , 27(2):720–739, 2014.
  * Runge et al. [2015a] J. Runge, R. V. Donner, and J. Kurths.  Optimal model-free prediction from multivariate time series.  _Physical Review E_ , 91(5):052909, 2015a.
  * Runge et al. [2015b] J. Runge, V. Petoukhov, J. F. Donges, J. Hlinka, N. Jajcay, M. Vejmelka, D. Hartman, N. Marwan, M. Paluš, and J. Kurths.  Identifying causal gateways and mediators in complex spatio-temporal systems.  _Nature communications_ , 6(1):1–10, 2015b.
  * Runge et al. [2019a] J. Runge, S. Bathiany, E. Bollt, G. Camps-Valls, D. Coumou, E. Deyle, C. Glymour, M. Kretschmer, M. D. Mahecha, J. Muñoz-Marí, et al.  Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences.  _Nature communications_ , 10(1):1–13, 2019a.
  * Runge et al. [2019b] J. Runge, P. Nowack, M. Kretschmer, S. Flaxman, and D. Sejdinovic.  Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets.  _Science advances_ , 5(11):eaau4996, 2019b.
  * Runge et al. [2020] J. Runge, X.-A. Tibau, M. Bruhns, J. Muñoz-Marí, and G. Camps-Valls.  The causality for climate competition.  In _NeurIPS 2019 Competition and Demonstration Track_ , pages 110–120. Pmlr, 2020.
  * Runge et al. [2023] J. Runge, A. Gerhardus, G. Varando, V. Eyring, and G. Camps-Valls.  Causal inference for time series.  _Nature Reviews Earth & Environment_, 10:2553, 2023.
  * Russell [2021] S. Russell.  Human-compatible artificial intelligence.  _Human-Like Machine Intelligence_ , pages 3–23, 2021.
  * Russo [2010] F. Russo.  _Causality and causal modelling in the social sciences_.  Springer, 2010.
  * Rutten et al. [2020] V. Rutten, A. Bernacchia, M. Sahani, and G. Hennequin.  Non-reversible Gaussian processes for identifying latent dynamical structure in neural data.  In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 33, pages 9622–9632. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  * Saggioro et al. [2020] E. Saggioro, J. de Wiljes, M. Kretschmer, and J. Runge.  Reconstructing regime-dependent causal relationships from observational time series.  _Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science_ , 30(11):113115, 2020.
  * Sahoo et al. [2018] S. S. Sahoo, C. H. Lampert, and G. Martius.  Learning equations for extrapolation and control.  In J. Dy and A. Krause, editors, _Proc. 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, Stockholm, Sweden_ , volume 80, pages 4442–4450. Pmlr, 2018.
  * Salcedo-Sanz et al. [2022] S. Salcedo-Sanz, D. Casillas-Pérez, J. Del Ser, C. Casanova-Mateo, L. Cuadra, M. Piles, and G. Camps-Valls.  Persistence in complex systems.  _Physics Reports_ , 957:1–73, 2022.
  * Sani et al. [2021] O. Sani, H. Abbaspourazad, Y. Wong, B. Pesaran, and M. Shanechi.  Modeling behaviorally relevant neural dynamics enabled by preferential subspace identification.  _Nature Neuroscience_ , 24:140–149, 2021.  doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00733-0.
  * Schaffer [1990] C. Schaffer.  Constructing Explanations for Propositional Knowledge Bases.  _Machine Learning_ , 4(4):321–353, 1990.
  * Schirner et al. [2022] M. Schirner, L. Domide, D. Perdikis, P. Triebkorn, L. Stefanovski, R. Pai, P. Prodan, B. Valean, J. Palmer, C. Langford, A. Blickensdörfer, M. van der Vlag, S. Diaz-Pier, A. Peyser, W. Klijn, D. Pleiter, A. Nahm, O. Schmid, M. Woodman, L. Zehl, J. Fousek, S. Petkoski, L. Kusch, M. Hashemi, D. Marinazzo, J.-F. Mangin, A. Flöel, S. Akintoye, B. C. Stahl, M. Cepic, E. Johnson, G. Deco, A. R. McIntosh, C. C. Hilgetag, M. Morgan, B. Schuller, A. Upton, C. McMurtrie, T. Dickscheid, J. G. Bjaalie, K. Amunts, J. Mersmann, V. Jirsa, and P. Ritter.  Brain simulation as a cloud service: The Virtual Brain on EBRAINS.  _NeuroImage_ , 251:118973, 2022.
  * Schmekel et al. [2022] D. Schmekel, F. Alcántara-Ávila, S. Hoyas, and R. Vinuesa.  Predicting coherent turbulent structures via deep learning.  _Front. Phys._ , 10:888832, 2022.
  * Schmid [2010] P. J. Schmid.  Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data.  _Journal of Fluid Mechanics_ , 656:5–28, 2010.
  * Schmidt and Lipson [2009a] M. Schmidt and H. Lipson.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data.  _Science_ , 324(5923):81–85, 2009a.
  * Schmidt and Lipson [2009b] M. Schmidt and H. Lipson.  Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data.  _Science_ , 324(5923):81–85, 2009b.
  * Schmidt et al. [2011] M. D. Schmidt, R. R. Vallabhajosyula, J. W. Jenkins, J. E. Hood, A. S. Soni, J. P. Wikswo, and H. Lipson.  Automated refinement and inference of analytical models for metabolic networks.  _Physical biology_ , 8(5):055011, 2011.
  * Schneider et al. [2023] S. Schneider, J. H. Lee, and M. W. Mathis.  Learnable latent embeddings for joint behavioural and neural analysis.  _Nature_ , May 2023.  ISSN 1476-4687.  doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06031-6.  URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06031-6.
  * Schölkopf and Smola [2008] B. Schölkopf and A. Smola.  _Learning with Kernels_.  MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008.
  * Schölkopf et al. [2021] B. Schölkopf, F. Locatello, S. Bauer, N. R. Ke, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Goyal, and Y. Bengio.  Toward causal representation learning.  _Proceedings of the IEEE_ , 109(5):612–634, 2021\.
  * Schreiber [2000] T. Schreiber.  Measuring information transfer.  _Physical review letters_ , 85(2):461, 2000.
  * Schütt et al. [2017] K. T. Schütt, F. Arbabzadah, S. Chmiela, K. R. Müller, and A. Tkatchenko.  Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks.  _Nature communications_ , 8(1):13890, 2017.
  * Schwantes and Pande [2015] C. R. Schwantes and V. S. Pande.  Modeling molecular kinetics with tICA and the kernel trick.  _Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation_ , 11:600–608, 2015.
  * Scott Armstrong and Collopy [1993] J. Scott Armstrong and F. Collopy.  Causal forces: Structuring knowledge for time-series extrapolation.  _Journal of Forecasting_ , 12(2):103–115, 1993\.
  * Sellars et al. [1956] W. Sellars et al.  Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind.  _Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science_ , 1(19):253–329, 1956.
  * Shah and Peters [2020] R. D. Shah and J. Peters.  The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure.  _The Annals of Statistics_ , 48(3):1514 – 1538, 2020.
  * Shannon [1948] C. E. Shannon.  A mathematical theory of communication.  _The Bell system technical journal_ , 27(3):379–423, 1948.
  * Shea et al. [2021] D. Shea, S. Brunton, and J. Kutz.  SINDy-BVP: Sparse identification of nonlinear dynamics for boundary value problems.  _Phys. Rev. Res._ , 3:023255, 2021.
  * Sheikhattar et al. [2018] A. Sheikhattar, S. Miran, J. Liu, J. B. Fritz, S. A. Shamma, P. O. Kanold, and B. Babadi.  Extracting neuronal functional network dynamics via adaptive Granger causality analysis.  _Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences_ , 115(17):E3869–e3878, 2018.
  * Shepherd [2019] T. G. Shepherd.  Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information.  _Proceedings of the Royal Society A_ , 475(2225):20190013, 2019.
  * Shimizu et al. [2006] S. Shimizu, P. O. Hoyer, A. Hyväinen, and A. Kerminen.  A Linear Non-Gaussian Acyclic Model for Causal Discovery.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 7(72):2003–2030, 2006.
  * Shimizu et al. [2011] S. Shimizu, T. Inazumi, Y. Sogawa, A. Hyvärinen, Y. Kawahara, T. Washio, P. O. Hoyer, and K. Bollen.  DirectLiNGAM: A direct method for learning a linear non-Gaussian structural equation model.  _The Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 12:1225–1248, 2011.
  * Shpitser and Pearl [2006] I. Shpitser and J. Pearl.  Identification of Conditional Interventional Distributions.  In R. Dechter and T. Richardson, editors, _Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’06, page 437–444, Arlington, Virginia, USA, 2006. AUAI Press.  ISBN 0974903922.
  * Shpitser and Pearl [2008] I. Shpitser and J. Pearl.  Complete identification methods for the causal hierarchy.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 9:1941–1979, 2008\.
  * Shrager and Langley [1990] J. Shrager and P. Langley.  _Computational Models of Scientific Discovery and Theory Formation_.  Morgan Kaufmann, 1990.
  * Siddiqi et al. [2022] S. H. Siddiqi, K. P. Kording, J. Parvizi, and M. D. Fox.  Causal mapping of human brain function.  _Nature reviews neuroscience_ , 23(6):361–375, 2022.
  * Simidjievski et al. [2020] N. Simidjievski, L. Todorovski, J. Kocijan, and S. Džeroski.  Equation discovery for nonlinear system identification.  _IEEE Access_ , 8:29930–29943, 2020.
  * Simon et al. [1989] H. A. Simon et al.  The scientist as problem solver.  _Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon_ , pages 375–398, 1989.
  * Spalart [2000] P. R. Spalart.  Strategies for turbulence modelling and simulations.  _Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow_ , 21:252–263, 2000.
  * Spirtes and Glymour [1991] P. Spirtes and C. Glymour.  An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs.  _Social science computer review_ , 9(1):62–72, 1991.
  * Spirtes et al. [1995] P. Spirtes, C. Meek, and T. Richardson.  Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Bias.  In P. Besnard and S. Hanks, editors, _Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’95, page 499–506, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1995. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.  ISBN 1558603859.
  * Spirtes et al. [2000] P. Spirtes, C. Glymour, and R. Scheines.  _Causation, Prediction, and Search_.  MIT Press, Boston, 2000.
  * Stegle et al. [2010] O. Stegle, D. Janzing, K. Zhang, J. M. Mooij, and B. Schölkopf.  Probabilistic latent variable models for distinguishing between cause and effect.  In J. Lafferty, C. Williams, J. Shawe-Taylor, R. Zemel, and A. Culotta, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 23. Curran Associates, Inc., 2010.
  * Stephan et al. [2010] K. E. Stephan, W. D. Penny, R. J. Moran, H. E. den Ouden, J. Daunizeau, and K. J. Friston.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling.  _Neuroimage_ , 49(4):3099–3109, 2010.
  * Stephens [2022] T. Stephens.  gplearn: Genetic programming in Python with a scikit-learn inspired API.  https://gplearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable, 2022.
  * Sterman [1994] J. D. Sterman.  Learning in and about complex systems.  _System dynamics review_ , 10(2-3):291–330, 1994\.
  * Stocker et al. [2013] T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. Midgley.  Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5).  _New York_ , 2013.
  * Stokes and Purdon [2017] P. A. Stokes and P. L. Purdon.  A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective.  _Proceedings of the national academy of sciences_ , 114(34):E7063–e7072, 2017.
  * Strobl [2019] E. V. Strobl.  A constraint-based algorithm for causal discovery with cycles, latent variables and selection bias.  _International Journal of Data Science and Analytics_ , 8(1):33–56, 2019.
  * Strobl et al. [2018] E. V. Strobl, S. Visweswaran, and P. L. Spirtes.  Fast causal inference with non-random missingness by test-wise deletion.  _International journal of data science and analytics_ , 6:47–62, 2018.
  * Sugihara et al. [2012] G. Sugihara, R. May, H. Ye, C.-h. Hsieh, E. Deyle, M. Fogarty, and S. Munch.  Detecting causality in complex ecosystems.  _science_ , 338(6106):496–500, 2012.
  * Sugiyama and Kawanabe [2012] M. Sugiyama and M. Kawanabe.  _Machine learning in non-stationary environments: Introduction to covariate shift adaptation_.  MIT press, 2012.
  * Sun et al. [2023] X. Sun, O. Schulte, G. Liu, and P. Poupart.  NTS-NOTEARS: Learning nonparametric DBNs with prior knowledge.  In _The 26th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS)_ , 2023.
  * Suseela et al. [2022] S. S. Suseela, Y. Feng, and K. Mao.  A comparative study on machine learning algorithms for knowledge discovery.  In _2022 17th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV)_ , pages 131–136. Ieee, 2022.
  * Swearingen and Blackwelder [1987] J. D. Swearingen and R. F. Blackwelder.  The growth and breakdown of streamwise vortices in the presence of a wall.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 182:255–290, 1987.
  * Tabas et al. [2019] A. Tabas, M. Andermann, V. Schuberth, H. Riedel, E. Balaguer-Ballester, and A. Rupp.  Modeling and MEG evidence of early consonance processing in auditory cortex.  _PLOS Computational Biology_ , 15(2):1–28, 02 2019.
  * Taira et al. [2017] K. Taira, S. L. Brunton, S. Dawson, C. W. Rowley, T. Colonius, B. J. McKeon, O. T. Schmidt, S. Gordeyev, V. Theofilis, and L. S. Ukeiley.  Modal analysis of fluid flows: An overview.  _Aiaa J._ , 55(12):4013–4041, 2017.
  * Takagi [2020] K. Takagi.  Principles of mutual information maximization and energy minimization affect the activation patterns of large scale networks in the brain.  _Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience_ , 13, 2020.
  * Takeishi et al. [2017] N. Takeishi, Y. Kawahara, and T. Yairi.  Learning koopman invariant subspaces for dynamic mode decomposition.  _Advances in neural information processing systems_ , 30, 2017.
  * Takens [1981] F. Takens.  Detecting strange attractors in turbulence.  In D. A. Rand and L.-S. Young, editors, _Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980_ , volume 898 of _Lecture Notes in Mathematics_ , pages 366–381. Springer, Berlin, 1981.  ISBN 978-3-540-11171-9.
  * Tarski and Tarski [1994] A. Tarski and J. Tarski.  _Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of the Deductive Sciences_.  Number 24. Oxford University Press on Demand, 1994.
  * Tennekes and Lumley [1972] H. Tennekes and J. L. Lumley.  A first course in turbulence.  _MIT press_ , 1972.
  * Thiem et al. [2020] T. N. Thiem, M. Kooshkbaghi, T. Bertalan, C. R. Laing, and I. G. Kevrekidis.  Emergent spaces for coupled oscillators.  _Front. Comput. Neurosci._ , 14:36, May 2020.
  * Tibau et al. [2022] X.-A. Tibau, C. Reimers, A. Gerhardus, J. Denzler, V. Eyring, and J. Runge.  A spatiotemporal stochastic climate model for benchmarking causal discovery methods for teleconnections.  _Environmental Data Science_ , 1:e12, 2022.
  * Tibshirani [1996] R. Tibshirani.  Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso.  _Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Series B)_ , 58:267–288, 1996.
  * Tipping [2001] M. E. Tipping.  Sparse Bayesian learning and the relevance vector machine.  _Journal of machine learning research_ , 1(Jun):211–244, 2001.
  * Todd et al. [2013] M. T. Todd, L. E. Nystrom, and J. D. Cohen.  Confounds in multivariate pattern analysis: Theory and rule representation case study.  _NeuroImage_ , 77:157–165, 2013.
  * Tognoli and Kelso [2014] E. Tognoli and J. S. Kelso.  The metastable brain.  _Neuron_ , 81(1):35–48, 2014.
  * Tu et al. [2014] J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, D. M. Luchtenburg, S. L. Brunton, and J. N. Kutz.  On dynamic mode decomposition: Theory and applications.  _Journal of Computational Dynamics_ , 1, 2014.
  * Tu et al. [2019] R. Tu, C. Zhang, P. Ackermann, K. Mohan, H. Kjellström, and K. Zhang.  Causal discovery in the presence of missing data.  In _The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics_ , pages 1762–1770. Pmlr, 2019.
  * Udrescu and Tegmark [2020] S.-M. Udrescu and M. Tegmark.  AI Feynman: A physics-inspired method for symbolic regression.  _Science Advances_ , 6(16):eaay2631, 2020.
  * Udrescu et al. [2020] S.-M. Udrescu, A. Tan, J. Feng, O. Neto, T. Wu, and M. Tegmark.  AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularity.  In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 33, pages 4860–4871. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  * Uhler et al. [2013] C. Uhler, G. Raskutti, P. Bühlmann, and B. Yu.  Geometry of the faithfulness assumption in causal inference.  _The Annals of Statistics_ , pages 436–463, 2013.
  * Ulam [1960] S. M. Ulam.  _A Collection of Mathematical Problems_.  Interscience Publisher NY, 1960.
  * Van der Maaten and Hinton [2008] L. Van der Maaten and G. Hinton.  Visualizing data using t-SNE.  _Journal of machine learning research_ , 9(11), 2008.
  * VanderWeele [2015] T. VanderWeele.  _Explanation in causal inference: Methods for mediation and interaction_.  Oxford University Press, 2015.
  * Vapnik [1999] V. N. Vapnik.  An overview of statistical learning theory.  _IEEE transactions on neural networks_ , 10(5):988–999, 1999.
  * Varando and Hansen [2020] G. Varando and N. R. Hansen.  Graphical continuous Lyapunov models.  In _Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , pages 989–998. PMLR, 2020.
  * Vaswani et al. [2017] A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin.  Attention is all you need.  In I. Guyon, U. V. Luxburg, S. Bengio, H. Wallach, R. Fergus, S. Vishwanathan, and R. Garnett, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 30. Curran Associates, Inc., 2017\.
  * Verma and Pearl [1990a] T. Verma and J. Pearl.  Causal networks: Semantics and expressiveness.  In R. D. Shachter, T. S. Levitt, L. N. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, editors, _Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , volume 9 of _Machine Intelligence and Pattern Recognition_ , pages 69–76. North-Holland, 1990a.
  * Verma and Pearl [1990b] T. Verma and J. Pearl.  Equivalence and synthesis of causal models.  In P. P. Bonissone, M. Henrion, L. N. Kanal, and J. F. Lemmer, editors, _Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai ’90, page 255–270, New York, NY, USA, 1990b. Elsevier Science Inc.  ISBN 0444892648.
  * Versteeg et al. [2022] P. Versteeg, J. Mooij, and C. Zhang.  Local constraint-based causal discovery under selection bias.  In B. Schölkopf, C. Uhler, and K. Zhang, editors, _Proceedings of the First Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning_ , volume 177 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 840–860. Pmlr, 11–13 Apr 2022.
  * Vinuesa and Sirmacek [2021] R. Vinuesa and B. Sirmacek.  Interpretable deep-learning models to help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.  _Nat. Mach. Intell._ , 3:926, 2021.
  * Vinuesa et al. [2018] R. Vinuesa, P. Schlatter, and H. M. Nagib.  Secondary flow in turbulent ducts with increasing aspect ratio.  _Phys. Rev. Fluids_ , 3:054606, 2018.
  * Von Storch and Zwiers [2002] H. Von Storch and F. W. Zwiers.  _Statistical analysis in climate research_.  Cambridge university press, 2002.
  * Wagner [1999] A. Wagner.  Causality in complex systems.  _Biology and Philosophy_ , 14:83–101, 1999.
  * Waleffe [1995] F. Waleffe.  Hydrodynamic stability and turbulence: Beyond transients to a self-sustaining process.  _Stud. Appl. Maths_ , 95:319–343, 1995.
  * Walker [1923] G. T. Walker.  Correlation in seasonal variations of weather, VIII: A preliminary study of world weather.  _Mem. Indian Meteorol. Dep._ , 24(4):75–131, 1923\.
  * Wallace et al. [1972] J. M. Wallace, H. Eckelman, and R. S. Brodkey.  The wall region in turbulent shear flow.  _J. Fluid Mech._ , 54:39–48, 1972.
  * Waltz and Buchanan [2009] D. Waltz and B. G. Buchanan.  Automating science.  _Science_ , 324(5923):43–44, 2009.
  * Wang et al. [2012] Z. Wang, I. Akhtar, J. Borggaard, and T. Iliescu.  Proper orthogonal decomposition closure models for turbulent flows: A numerical comparison.  _Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng._ , 237:10–26, 2012.
  * Warne [2000] A. Warne.  Causality and regime inference in a Markov switching VAR.  Technical report, Sveriges Riksbank Working Paper Series, 2000.
  * Washio and Motoda [1997] T. Washio and H. Motoda.  Inductive inference of first-order rules with non-linear structures.  _Machine Learning_ , 27(2):153–172, 1997.
  * Watson and Crick [1953] J. D. Watson and F. H. Crick.  Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid.  _Nature_ , 171(4356), 1953.
  * Weatheritt and Sandberg [2016] J. Weatheritt and R. D. Sandberg.  A novel evolutionary algorithm applied to algebraic modifications of the RANS stress-strain relationship.  _J. Comput. Phys._ , 325:22–37, 2016.
  * Weatheritt and Sandberg [2017] J. Weatheritt and R. D. Sandberg.  The development of algebraic stress models using a novel evolutionary algorithm.  _Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow_ , 68:298–318, 2017.
  * Weichwald and Peters [2021] S. Weichwald and J. Peters.  Causality in cognitive neuroscience: concepts, challenges, and distributional robustness.  _Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience_ , 33(2):226–247, 2021.
  * Weichwald et al. [2015] S. Weichwald, T. Meyer, O. Özdenizci, B. Schölkopf, T. Ball, and M. Grosse-Wentrup.  Causal interpretation rules for encoding and decoding models in neuroimaging.  _NeuroImage_ , 110:48–59, 2015.
  * Werner et al. [2021] M. Werner, A. Junginger, P. Hennig, and G. Martius.  Informed equation learning, 2021.
  * Werner et al. [2022] M. Werner, A. Junginger, P. Hennig, and G. Martius.  Uncertainty in equation learning.  In _Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion (GECCO)_ , pages 2298–2305. Association for Computing Machinery, 2022.
  * Williams et al. [2015a] M. O. Williams, I. G. Kevrekidis, and C. W. Rowley.  A data-driven approximation of the Koopman operator: Extending dynamic mode decomposition.  _Journal of Nonlinear Science_ , 25:1307–1346, 2015a.
  * Williams et al. [2015b] M. O. Williams, C. W. Rowley, and I. G. Kevrekidis.  A kernel-based method for data-driven Koopman spectral analysis.  _Journal of Computational Dynamics_ , 2:247–265, 2015b.
  * Wilson and Cowan [1972] H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons.  _Biophysical Journal_ , 12:1–24, 1972.
  * Wilson and Cowan [2021] H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan.  Evolution of the Wilson-Cowan equations.  _Biol. Cybern._ , 115(6):643–653, Dec. 2021.
  * Wimsatt and Wimsatt [2007] W. C. Wimsatt and W. K. Wimsatt.  _Re-engineering philosophy for limited beings: Piecewise approximations to reality_.  Harvard University Press, 2007.
  * Winship and Morgan [1999] C. Winship and S. L. Morgan.  The estimation of causal effects from observational data.  _Annual review of sociology_ , pages 659–706, 1999.
  * Winter [2002] E. Winter.  The shapley value.  _Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications_ , 3:2025–2054, 2002.
  * Woolgar et al. [2014] A. Woolgar, P. Golland, and S. Bode.  Coping with confounds in multivoxel pattern analysis: What should we do about reaction time differences? A comment on Todd, Nystrom & Cohen 2013\.  _NeuroImage_ , 98:506–512, 2014.
  * Wootton [2015] D. Wootton.  _The invention of science: A new history of the scientific revolution_.  Penguin UK, 2015.
  * Wu et al. [2021] Z. Wu, S. L. Brunton, and S. Revzen.  Challenges in dynamic mode decomposition.  _Journal of the Royal Society Interface_ , 18(185):20210686, 2021.
  * Ye et al. [2015] H. Ye, E. R. Deyle, L. J. Gilarranz, and G. Sugihara.  Distinguishing time-delayed causal interactions using convergent cross mapping.  _Scientific reports_ , 5(1):1–9, 2015.
  * Yousif et al. [2022] M. Z. Yousif, M. Zhang, L. Yu, R. Vinuesa, and H. Lim.  A transformer-based synthetic-inflow generator for spatially-developing turbulent boundary layers.  _J. Fluid Mech., To Appear. Preprint arXiv:2206.01618_ , 2022.
  * Yu et al. [2009] B. M. Yu, J. P. Cunningham, G. Santhanam, S. I. Ryu, K. V. Shenoy, and M. Sahani.  Gaussian-process factor analysis for low-dimensional single-trial analysis of neural population activity.  _Journal of Neurophysiology_ , 102(1):614–635, 2009.  Pmid: 19357332.
  * Yu et al. [2020] S. Yu, M. Drton, and A. Shojaie.  Directed graphical models and causal discovery for zero-inflated data.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04150_ , 2020.
  * Yu et al. [2021] Y. Yu, T. Gao, N. Yin, and Q. Ji.  DAGs with No Curl: An Efficient DAG Structure Learning Approach.  In M. Meila and T. Zhang, editors, _Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning_ , volume 139 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 12156–12166. PMLR, 18–24 Jul 2021.
  * Zanna and Bolton [2020] L. Zanna and T. Bolton.  Data-driven equation discovery of ocean mesoscale closures.  _Geophysical Research Letters_ , 47(17):e2020GL088376, 2020.
  * Zhang [2008a] J. Zhang.  Causal reasoning with ancestral graphs.  _Journal of Machine Learning Research_ , 9(47):1437–1474, 2008a.
  * Zhang [2008b] J. Zhang.  On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias.  _Artificial Intelligence_ , 172(16):1873–1896, 2008b.
  * Zhang and Spirtes [2002] J. Zhang and P. Spirtes.  Strong faithfulness and uniform consistency in causal inference.  In _Proceedings of the Nineteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence_ , Uai’03, page 632–639, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2002\. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.  ISBN 0127056645.
  * Zhang and Spirtes [2008] J. Zhang and P. Spirtes.  Detection of unfaithfulness and robust causal inference.  _Minds and Machines_ , 18(2):239–271, 2008.
  * Zheng et al. [2018] X. Zheng, B. Aragam, P. K. Ravikumar, and E. P. Xing.  DAGs with NO TEARS: Continuous optimization for structure learning.  In S. Bengio, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, K. Grauman, N. Cesa-Bianchi, and R. Garnett, editors, _Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems_ , volume 31. Curran Associates, Inc., 2018.
  * Zheng et al. [2020] X. Zheng, C. Dan, B. Aragam, P. Ravikumar, and E. Xing.  Learning sparse nonparametric DAGs.  In S. Chiappa and R. Calandra, editors, _Proceedings of the Twenty Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics_ , volume 108 of _Proceedings of Machine Learning Research_ , pages 3414–3425. Pmlr, 26–28 Aug 2020.
  * Zou et al. [2012] H. Zou, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani.  Sparse principal component analysis.  _J. Comput. Graph. Stat._ , 15(1):265–286, 2012\.
  * Zscheischler et al. [2018] J. Zscheischler, S. Westra, B. J. Van Den Hurk, S. I. Seneviratne, P. J. Ward, A. Pitman, A. AghaKouchak, D. N. Bresch, M. Leonard, T. Wahl, et al.  Future climate risk from compound events.  _Nature Climate Change_ , 8(6):469–477, 2018\.
  * Zscheischler et al. [2020] J. Zscheischler, O. Martius, S. Westra, E. Bevacqua, C. Raymond, R. M. Horton, B. van den Hurk, A. AghaKouchak, A. Jézéquel, M. D. Mahecha, et al.  A typology of compound weather and climate events.  _Nature reviews earth & environment_, 1(7):333–347, 2020.
  * Żytkow et al. [1990] J. Żytkow, R. Michalski, and R. Stepp.  Representation and learning of categorical structures.  _Machine Learning_ , 5(1):7–48, 1990.