Along with the development of manual suturing, mechanical technique was also the subject of much work. In 1892, John Murphy of Chicago developed a two-button cholecysto-jejunal anastomosis technique, which was later extended to other digestive structures [7]. Most of the principles of mechanical stapling were laid down by the Hungarian Hult in 1909: compression of the tissues, form of B-staples, staggered arrangement of staples [8]*.* Von Petz developed in 1921 a device widely used for gastric stapling, later improved by the Japanese Nakayama [9, 10]*.* The former USSR contributed to the development of the mechanical stapling devices by the end of World War II. In a very large and war-torn country, it was necessary to develop easy to teach techniques for poorly trained surgeons. The research institute then created linear and circular staplers, efficient but too heavy in steel [11]. In 1958, returning from a study trip to Ukraine, American Mark Ravitch developed the technique in his laboratory in Baltimore, first on the lungs, then extended to other surgeries. He founded a company in order to establish, with his students, an entire successful range of mechanical anastomosis equipment whose main advances were: lighter and more manageable instruments, staggered staples already pre-installed and sterilized allowing several uses with the same forceps. In 1976, the first single-use mechanical stapler was marketed. Numerous technical developments contributed to the progressive improvement in the devices such as articulated grippers, and replacement

**28**

Several other factors are often neglected; however, they contribute to the quality of healing. These include the nutritional status, the defensive capacity and hemodynamic status of the patient. A digestive anastomosis should be omitted in the events of hemodynamic failure, significant patient undernutrition, significant inflammation, generalized sepsis, advanced cancer, and emergency interventions for generalized peritonitis, intestinal obstruction, or significant fecal contamination. Likewise, the presence of patient-specific immunosuppressive factors such as chronic smoking, diabetes or long-term corticosteroid therapy may prompt surgeons to either giving up performing an anastomosis, or postponing it, and/or protecting it with a temporary diverting enterostomy. These risk factors are potentially responsible for real changes in the operating strategy and must be communicated to the patient before the procedure.

	- The ABSENCE OF ANY TENSION is easily achieved for mobile structures like the small intestine
	- The ANASTOMOTIC EDGES MUST BE WELL VASCULARIZED, both arterially and venously.
	- VALID ENTEROSYNTHESIS PROCESS (MANUAL OR MECHANICAL): the manual anastomosis technique must be of high quality and it is only at this precise point that the surgeon influences the quality of healing. Mechanical stapling pliers must be reliable. Two checks are useful after anastomosis: the quality control of the flanges in case of circular stapling, the airtightness test which seems useful but not essential [15];
	- HEMOSTASE OF ANASTOMOTIC SEGMENTS: Local bleeding can activate proteolytic enzymes and damage local granulation tissue. However, this last point could be in contradiction with the good vascularization of the tissues:

it is therefore necessary to find the right compromise and not to excessively electro-coagulate the digestive walls. Hemostasis with fine threads or bipolar forceps is often very useful for this purpose [15].

#### **4. Types of anastomoses**

Digestive anastomoses are designated after the two types of viscera involved (esophagus, stomach, jejunum, ileum, colon, rectum, bile duct), and, on the way in which the stoma mouths are anastomosed. The term "terminal" (T) is used when the entire mouth of the bowel is involved with the anastomosis, and the term "lateral" (L) when the side of the bowel segment and not its mouths is incorporated into the anastomosis. There are thus four types of anastomosis:

Thus, a "terminal colorectal" anastomosis is the opening of the colonic mouth on the anterior or posterior surface of the rectum, while a "lateroterminal colorectal" anastomosis is the connection from the lateral surface of the colon to the rectal mouth.

#### • Hand-sewn anastomoses

Traditionally, anastomoses were hand-sewn. The two-layer technique generated a certain sense of security in the past but single-layer anastomoses are now preferred because they heal faster.  Interrupted sero-submucosal sutures allow the best tissue apposition and cause minimal damage to the submucosal vascularization.

*Continuous single-layer serosubmucosal suture* is particularly effective if digestive tract's access is good and the anastomosis is technically simple as in the upper gastrointestinal tract (gastro- jejunostomy and bilio-enteric anastomoses). It is preferred to the interrupted single-layer technique in these cases because it is quicker [16].

Monofilament threads (like polydioxanone) are preferred because they usually cause less fibrosis formation than the braided ones (polyglactin). It has been noted that more inflammation is likely to happen in the braided suture lines. Local edema can lead to increased digestive transit difficulty and colicky pain [17].

• Stapled anastomoses

Three types of suturing devices have been developed: non-cutting linear suturing forceps, cutting linear suturing forceps and circular suturing forceps. However, there

**31**

with stapling.

*Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700*

tions for use and contraindications [18].

• Sutureless anastomoses

exists a great diversity of materials currently available in the market that are being constant upgraded. Staplers are appealing because they are easy to use and may be quicker than some sutured anastomoses. In situations where anastomosis is difficult (low colorectal) or if multiple anastomoses are required at the end of a lengthy procedure, mechanical devices can be very useful. The anatomy of the stapled intestinal anastomosis is similar to traditional two-layer hand-sewn anastomosis and they require the same attention as hand-sewn anastomoses. Anastomoses can be made with linear or circular stapling devices, used alone or in combination. The choice of a technique (triangulation with a cutting or non-cutting linear forceps, combined use of cutting and non-cutting forceps, use of a circular forceps) is made by the surgeon during the operation. This choice depends on the dimensions of the tissue, in particular their thickness, the diameter of the viscera to be anastomosed and their site (deep or superficial anastomosis in abdominal surgery). The use of mechanical sutures respects the main principles of classical surgery, with its indications, precau-

They have been in use since Murphy's button in 1892 [19]. Nowadays, sutureless devices include compression magnetic rings, tissue glue, laser-YAG or self-gripping

The choice of anastomotic technique is between hand-sewn sutures and staples, because sutureless anastomoses remain experimental. The selection of technique is often made on the grounds of personal convenience, cost, and personal experience. Objective evidence has failed to show an outstanding benefit that would favor the use of staples over manual sutures. Most randomized trials comparing a variety of suture techniques with staples did not confirm the advantage of stapled anastomoses in terms of leaks, mortality or cancer recurrence. The increased rate of stapled anastomoses stenosis is well documented. Only few strictures require treatment, usually by dilation or endoluminal incision/resection. Surgeons in training should adopt an anastomotic method that is easily reproductible. Hand-sewn single-layer techniques (continuous or interrupted) should be mastered before relying on stapling devices, allowing the surgeon to take action if technical problems occur

Stapled intestinal anastomoses have been widely studied and are preferred over hand-sewn anastomoses because of their safety and efficacy profiles [23–25]. There is evidence suggesting that decreased operative time and anastomotic leak rates may be associated with the use of a stapled technique, in some types of anastomoses such as ileocolic anastomosis [26]. Overall, the evidence that is available has shown no difference between stapled and hand-sewn anastomotic techniques [27–30]. Stapled anastomoses are supposed to take less time, therefore, the operative stress on the patient should be lower leading to faster recovery with lower rate of postoperative ileus and shorter hospital stay as Bragg et al. could show in their study (operating time p = 0,02; anastomotic failures p = 0,03; hospital days p < 0,01) [31]. Jurowich et al., compared stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in 4062 patients with right sided hemicolectomy due to right colon cancer, published similar results even though less operating time did not translate into shorter overall hospital stay in that study [31]. The occurrence of post-operative ileus also depends on the extent of the resection, the intraoperative fluid management, the use of minimally-invasive

mesh. But most of these techniques remain experimental [20–22].

**5. Choice between manual and mechanical anastomoses**

#### *Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

**4. Types of anastomoses**

anastomosis.

anastomosis.

• Hand-sewn anastomoses

than two-layer techniques [16]*.*

• Stapled anastomoses

it is therefore necessary to find the right compromise and not to excessively electro-coagulate the digestive walls. Hemostasis with fine threads or bipolar

Digestive anastomoses are designated after the two types of viscera involved (esophagus, stomach, jejunum, ileum, colon, rectum, bile duct), and, on the way in which the stoma mouths are anastomosed. The term "terminal" (T) is used when the entire mouth of the bowel is involved with the anastomosis, and the term "lateral" (L) when the side of the bowel segment and not its mouths is incorporated

• End-to-end (TT) when the two digestive segments are "mouth-to-mouth"

• Laterolateral (LL) when the two segments are anastomosed side by side, the ends requiring elective closure. This is referred to as a "terminal" LL

Thus, a "terminal colorectal" anastomosis is the opening of the colonic mouth on the anterior or posterior surface of the rectum, while a "lateroterminal colorectal" anastomosis is the connection from the lateral surface of the colon to the rectal mouth.

Traditionally, anastomoses were hand-sewn. The two-layer technique generated

a certain sense of security in the past but single-layer anastomoses are now preferred because they heal faster. In fact, they allow a more accurate musculo-mucosal realignment and cause less reduction in lumen size and less tissue strangulation

*Interrupted single-layer serosubmucosal suture* is the preferred hand-sewn technique. Interrupted sero-submucosal sutures allow the best tissue apposition and

*Continuous single-layer serosubmucosal suture* is particularly effective if digestive tract's access is good and the anastomosis is technically simple as in the upper gastrointestinal tract (gastro- jejunostomy and bilio-enteric anastomoses). It is preferred to the interrupted single-layer technique in these cases because it is quicker [16]. Monofilament threads (like polydioxanone) are preferred because they usually cause less fibrosis formation than the braided ones (polyglactin). It has been noted that more inflammation is likely to happen in the braided suture lines. Local edema

Three types of suturing devices have been developed: non-cutting linear suturing forceps, cutting linear suturing forceps and circular suturing forceps. However, there

• Terminolateral (TL) when the mouth of the first designated segment is anasto-

forceps is often very useful for this purpose [15].

into the anastomosis. There are thus four types of anastomosis:

mosed on the side of the second designated segment.

• Lateroterminal (LT): the reverse of the previous one.

cause minimal damage to the submucosal vascularization.

can lead to increased digestive transit difficulty and colicky pain [17].

**30**

exists a great diversity of materials currently available in the market that are being constant upgraded. Staplers are appealing because they are easy to use and may be quicker than some sutured anastomoses. In situations where anastomosis is difficult (low colorectal) or if multiple anastomoses are required at the end of a lengthy procedure, mechanical devices can be very useful. The anatomy of the stapled intestinal anastomosis is similar to traditional two-layer hand-sewn anastomosis and they require the same attention as hand-sewn anastomoses. Anastomoses can be made with linear or circular stapling devices, used alone or in combination. The choice of a technique (triangulation with a cutting or non-cutting linear forceps, combined use of cutting and non-cutting forceps, use of a circular forceps) is made by the surgeon during the operation. This choice depends on the dimensions of the tissue, in particular their thickness, the diameter of the viscera to be anastomosed and their site (deep or superficial anastomosis in abdominal surgery). The use of mechanical sutures respects the main principles of classical surgery, with its indications, precautions for use and contraindications [18].

• Sutureless anastomoses

They have been in use since Murphy's button in 1892 [19]. Nowadays, sutureless devices include compression magnetic rings, tissue glue, laser-YAG or self-gripping mesh. But most of these techniques remain experimental [20–22].

#### **5. Choice between manual and mechanical anastomoses**

The choice of anastomotic technique is between hand-sewn sutures and staples, because sutureless anastomoses remain experimental. The selection of technique is often made on the grounds of personal convenience, cost, and personal experience. Objective evidence has failed to show an outstanding benefit that would favor the use of staples over manual sutures. Most randomized trials comparing a variety of suture techniques with staples did not confirm the advantage of stapled anastomoses in terms of leaks, mortality or cancer recurrence. The increased rate of stapled anastomoses stenosis is well documented. Only few strictures require treatment, usually by dilation or endoluminal incision/resection. Surgeons in training should adopt an anastomotic method that is easily reproductible. Hand-sewn single-layer techniques (continuous or interrupted) should be mastered before relying on stapling devices, allowing the surgeon to take action if technical problems occur with stapling.

Stapled intestinal anastomoses have been widely studied and are preferred over hand-sewn anastomoses because of their safety and efficacy profiles [23–25]. There is evidence suggesting that decreased operative time and anastomotic leak rates may be associated with the use of a stapled technique, in some types of anastomoses such as ileocolic anastomosis [26]. Overall, the evidence that is available has shown no difference between stapled and hand-sewn anastomotic techniques [27–30]. Stapled anastomoses are supposed to take less time, therefore, the operative stress on the patient should be lower leading to faster recovery with lower rate of postoperative ileus and shorter hospital stay as Bragg et al. could show in their study (operating time p = 0,02; anastomotic failures p = 0,03; hospital days p < 0,01) [31]. Jurowich et al., compared stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in 4062 patients with right sided hemicolectomy due to right colon cancer, published similar results even though less operating time did not translate into shorter overall hospital stay in that study [31]. The occurrence of post-operative ileus also depends on the extent of the resection, the intraoperative fluid management, the use of minimally-invasive

surgery versus open surgery and many more factors. It is the combination of many of those parameters that contribute to the development of postoperative ileus and therefore a consecutive prolonged hospital stay [31–33].

Higher hospital readmission rate after bowel resection is often associated with anastomotic leakage [34]. Some authors showed a 30-day readmission rate around 10% after hand-sewn colo-rectal surgery, slightly higher than those with stapled anastomoses [35]. Determining the type of anastomosis (stapled or hand-sewn) which may lead to a reduced risk of anastomotic leak is still a matter of debate. On one hand, some authors like Farrah et al., showed a 2-times elevated risk of developing anastomotic leakage after stapled anastomoses compared to hand-sewn anastomoses. Nordholm-Carstens et al. in Denmark, conducted a retrospective cohort study that found 5.4% anastomotic leaks in the stapled versus 2.4% leaks in the hand-sewn group, this was statistically significant (p = 0.004) [36]. In contrast, Choy et al., in a Cochrane Database Review, showed a significantly lower anastomotic leakage rate in stapled anastomoses. These conflicting results may be attributed to the different ways of performing the stapled and sutured anastomosis, varying stapling and suture material and varying experience of the surgical team [37–39].

Performing perfect anastomoses is, of course, associated with higher levels of training and experience of the surgeon. It has always been a subject of discussion if and which anastomoses can be safely performed by an intern or surgical trainee. Schineis et al. in Germany provided some evidence that bowel anastomosis can be as safely performed by a surgical trainee as by a more experienced surgeon [40]. Cost is one of the major concerns that may prohibit the use of stapling devices. The impact of the use of stapling devices on hospitals' costs has rarely been explored. Devices cost may differ from hospital to another due to individual contracts negotiated between the individual hospitals and the distributing industries, it also varies between different countries [40].

#### **6. Conclusion**

There is a lot of debate around the choice of hand-sewn versus stapled intestinal anastomosis in view of multiple variables such as surgeon's convenience and experience, results concerning hospital length of stay and occurrence of anastomotic leakage. Stapled anastomoses seem to be favored compared to hand-sewn anastomoses in terms of operation time, cost in the operating rooms and total hospital costs in many studies on adult patients. Finally, it is up to the surgeons, in accordance to their usual practice and their individual patients' needs, to choose one technique over the other.

**33**

**Author details**

Dakar, Senegal

and Ousmane Thiam

Alpha Oumar Toure\*, Mamadou Seck, Mohamadou Lamine Gueye

\*Address all correspondence to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
provided the original work is properly cited.

Surgery and Surgical Specialties Department, Cheikh Anta Diop University,

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

*Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700* *Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

team [37–39].

**6. Conclusion**

over the other.

between different countries [40].

therefore a consecutive prolonged hospital stay [31–33].

surgery versus open surgery and many more factors. It is the combination of many of those parameters that contribute to the development of postoperative ileus and

Higher hospital readmission rate after bowel resection is often associated with anastomotic leakage [34]. Some authors showed a 30-day readmission rate around 10% after hand-sewn colo-rectal surgery, slightly higher than those with stapled anastomoses [35]. Determining the type of anastomosis (stapled or hand-sewn) which may lead to a reduced risk of anastomotic leak is still a matter of debate. On one hand, some authors like Farrah et al., showed a 2-times elevated risk of developing anastomotic leakage after stapled anastomoses compared to hand-sewn anastomoses. Nordholm-Carstens et al. in Denmark, conducted a retrospective cohort study that found 5.4% anastomotic leaks in the stapled versus 2.4% leaks in the hand-sewn group, this was statistically significant (p = 0.004) [36]. In contrast, Choy et al., in a Cochrane Database Review, showed a significantly lower anastomotic leakage rate in stapled anastomoses. These conflicting results may be attributed to the different ways of performing the stapled and sutured anastomosis, varying stapling and suture material and varying experience of the surgical

Performing perfect anastomoses is, of course, associated with higher levels of training and experience of the surgeon. It has always been a subject of discussion if and which anastomoses can be safely performed by an intern or surgical trainee. Schineis et al. in Germany provided some evidence that bowel anastomosis can be as safely performed by a surgical trainee as by a more experienced surgeon [40]. Cost is one of the major concerns that may prohibit the use of stapling devices. The impact of the use of stapling devices on hospitals' costs has rarely been explored. Devices cost may differ from hospital to another due to individual contracts negotiated between the individual hospitals and the distributing industries, it also varies

There is a lot of debate around the choice of hand-sewn versus stapled intestinal anastomosis in view of multiple variables such as surgeon's convenience and experience, results concerning hospital length of stay and occurrence of anastomotic leakage. Stapled anastomoses seem to be favored compared to hand-sewn anastomoses in terms of operation time, cost in the operating rooms and total hospital costs in many studies on adult patients. Finally, it is up to the surgeons, in accordance to their usual practice and their individual patients' needs, to choose one technique

**32**

### **Author details**

Alpha Oumar Toure\*, Mamadou Seck, Mohamadou Lamine Gueye and Ousmane Thiam Surgery and Surgical Specialties Department, Cheikh Anta Diop University, Dakar, Senegal

\*Address all correspondence to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

#### **References**

[1] Lembert A. Mémoire sur l'enterroraphie. Rep Gen Anat Physiol Pathol 1826; 2:101.

[2] Halsted XS. Circular suture of the intestine. An experimental study. J 1887;103:245-7.

[3] Jourdan P. Sutures en un plan des tuniques digestives. Position actuelle. J Chir 1965;90:649-55.

[4] Orr NW. A single-layer intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1969;56:771-4.

[5] Gambee LP, Garnjobst W, Hardwick CE. Ten years' experience of a single-layer anastomosis in colonic surgery. Am J Surg 1956;92:222-7.

[6] Everett WG. A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1975;62:135-40.

[7] Murphy JB. Intestinal approximation, with special reference to the use of the anastomosis button. Lancet 1894;2:621.

[8] Hultl 2nd H. Kongress der Ungarischen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Budapest. Mai 1908. Pester Med Chir 1909;45:108 [10,121-2]

[9] Von Petz A. Aseptic technique of stomach resections. Ann Surg 1927;86:338-43.

[10] Nakayama K. Simplification of the Bilroth I gastric resection. Surgery 1954;35:837-41.

[11] Androssov PI. Experience in the application of the instrumental mechanical suture in surgery of the stomach and rectum. Acta Chir Scand 1970;136:57-63.

[12] F.M. Steichen. Naissance des sutures mécaniques modernes en chirurgie:

petites et grandes histoires, en hommage à Mark Ravitch. Chirurgie 1998, 123(6): 616-623.

[13] Wind GG, Rich NM. Principles of surgical technique. The art of surgery. Munchen: Urban and Scharzenberg; 1987.

[14] Welter R, Patel JC. Chirurgie mécanique digestive. Paris: Masson; 1985.

[15] Kwon S, Morris A, Billingham R, Frankhouse J, Horvath K, Johnson M, et al., for the Surgical Care an Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP) Collaborative. Routine leak testing in colorectal surgery in the surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Arch Surg 2012;147:345-51.

[16] McKinley AJ, Krukowski ZH. Intestinal amastomoses. Surgery 2006, 24(7): 224-8.

[17] Marques dos Santos CH et al. Differences between polydioxanone and polyglactin in intestinal anastomoses – a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses. J Coloproctol 2017, 37(4):263-267.

[18] Nuiry O, Pedroli E, Simoens X, Balique JG. Les sutures mécaniques. Pharm. Hosp 1990;(101):7-15.

[19] M'ardle, J.S. The position of Murphy's button in modern surgery. Trans RAM Ireland 1900*,* 18**:**145.

[20] Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, Pichakron KO, Harrison MR. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2009, 44(1): 222-228.

[21] Yao L, Li C, Zhu X, Shao Y, Meng S, Shi L, Wang H. An Effective New

**35**

*Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700*

Monit. 2016;22:4570-4576.

26(3): 182-189.

2012;4:208-13.

2012;15:CD003144.

Intestinal Anastomosis Method. Med Sci

technique on early postoperative outcome in open right-sided

[32] Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 2015;34:367e76.

[33] Farrah JP, Lauer CW, Bray MS, McCartt JM, Chang MC, Meredith JW, Miller PR, Mowery NT. Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency general surgery: a retrospective review of outcomes in a unique patient population. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.

[34] Midura E, Hanseman D, Davis B, Atkinson S, Abbott D, Shah S, et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis *Colon rectum*

[35] Al-Mazrou AM, Suradkar K,

Characterization of readmission by day of rehospitalization after colorectal surgery. Dis *Colon rectum*

[36] Nordholm-Carstensen A, Schnack Rasmussen M, Krarup P-M. Increased leak rates following stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Dis *Colon*

[37] Resegotti A, Astegiano M, Farina E, Ciccone G, Avagnina G, Giustetto A, et al. "Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery". Dis *Colon*

2013;74(5):1187-92.

2015;58:333e8.

2017;60:202e12.

Mauro CM, Kiran RP.

*rectum* 2019;62:542e50.

*rectum* Mar. 2005;48:464e8.

[38] Morse B et al. Determination of independent predictive factors for anastomotic leak: analysis of 682 intestinal anastomoses The American Journal of Surgery 2013; 206:950-956.

hemicolectomy. BJS Open 2019;3:203e7.

[22] Chao Fan et al. Sutureless Intestinal Anastomosis with a Novel Device of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2011,

[23] Goulder F. Bowel anastomoses: The theory, the practice and the evidence base. World J Gastrointest Surg

[24] Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Da Silva EM, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev

[25] Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, et al. Systematic Review of the

Technique of Colorectal Anastomosis.

[26] Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD004320.

[27] Wrighton L, Curtis JL, Gollin G. Stapled intestinal anastomoses in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:2231-4.

[28] Mitchell IC, Barber R, Fischer AC, et al. Experience performing 64 consecutive stapled intestinal anastomoses in small children and infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:128-30.

[29] Powell RW. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neonates and infants: use of the endoscopic intestinal stapler. J

[30] Simmons JD, Gunter III JW, Manley JD, et al. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neo- nates. Am Surg

[31] Jurowich C, Lichthardt S, Matthes N, Kastner C, Haubitz I, Prock A, et al. Effects of anastomotic

Pediatr Surg 1995;30:195-7.

2010;76:644-6.

JAMA Surg 2013;148:190-201.

*Bowel Anastomoses: Manual or Mechanical DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.96700*

Intestinal Anastomosis Method. Med Sci Monit. 2016;22:4570-4576.

[22] Chao Fan et al. Sutureless Intestinal Anastomosis with a Novel Device of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis. Chinese Medical Sciences Journal 2011, 26(3): 182-189.

[23] Goulder F. Bowel anastomoses: The theory, the practice and the evidence base. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012;4:208-13.

[24] Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Da Silva EM, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;15:CD003144.

[25] Slieker JC, Daams F, Mulder IM, et al. Systematic Review of the Technique of Colorectal Anastomosis. JAMA Surg 2013;148:190-201.

[26] Choy PY, Bissett IP, Docherty JG, et al. Stapled versus handsewn methods for ileocolic anastomoses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;7:CD004320.

[27] Wrighton L, Curtis JL, Gollin G. Stapled intestinal anastomoses in infants. J Pediatr Surg 2008;43:2231-4.

[28] Mitchell IC, Barber R, Fischer AC, et al. Experience performing 64 consecutive stapled intestinal anastomoses in small children and infants. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46:128-30.

[29] Powell RW. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neonates and infants: use of the endoscopic intestinal stapler. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:195-7.

[30] Simmons JD, Gunter III JW, Manley JD, et al. Stapled intestinal anastomosis in neo- nates. Am Surg 2010;76:644-6.

[31] Jurowich C, Lichthardt S, Matthes N, Kastner C, Haubitz I, Prock A, et al. Effects of anastomotic technique on early postoperative outcome in open right-sided hemicolectomy. BJS Open 2019;3:203e7.

[32] Bragg D, El-Sharkawy AM, Psaltis E, Maxwell-Armstrong CA, Lobo DN. Postoperative ileus: recent developments in pathophysiology and management. Clin Nutr 2015;34:367e76.

[33] Farrah JP, Lauer CW, Bray MS, McCartt JM, Chang MC, Meredith JW, Miller PR, Mowery NT. Stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in emergency general surgery: a retrospective review of outcomes in a unique patient population. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(5):1187-92.

[34] Midura E, Hanseman D, Davis B, Atkinson S, Abbott D, Shah S, et al. Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis *Colon rectum* 2015;58:333e8.

[35] Al-Mazrou AM, Suradkar K, Mauro CM, Kiran RP. Characterization of readmission by day of rehospitalization after colorectal surgery. Dis *Colon rectum* 2017;60:202e12.

[36] Nordholm-Carstensen A, Schnack Rasmussen M, Krarup P-M. Increased leak rates following stapled versus handsewn ileocolic anastomosis in patients with right-sided colon cancer: a nationwide cohort study. Dis *Colon rectum* 2019;62:542e50.

[37] Resegotti A, Astegiano M, Farina E, Ciccone G, Avagnina G, Giustetto A, et al. "Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery". Dis *Colon rectum* Mar. 2005;48:464e8.

[38] Morse B et al. Determination of independent predictive factors for anastomotic leak: analysis of 682 intestinal anastomoses The American Journal of Surgery 2013; 206:950-956.

**34**

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

[1] Lembert A. Mémoire sur

l'enterroraphie. Rep Gen Anat Physiol

petites et grandes histoires, en hommage à Mark Ravitch. Chirurgie 1998, 123(6):

[13] Wind GG, Rich NM. Principles of surgical technique. The art of surgery. Munchen: Urban and

[14] Welter R, Patel JC. Chirurgie mécanique digestive. Paris:

[15] Kwon S, Morris A, Billingham R, Frankhouse J, Horvath K, Johnson M, et al., for the Surgical Care an Outcomes

Assessment Program (SCOAP) Collaborative. Routine leak testing in colorectal surgery in the surgical care and outcomes assessment program.

Arch Surg 2012;147:345-51.

[16] McKinley AJ, Krukowski ZH. Intestinal amastomoses. Surgery 2006,

[17] Marques dos Santos CH et al. Differences between polydioxanone and polyglactin in intestinal anastomoses – a comparative study of intestinal anastomoses. J Coloproctol 2017,

[18] Nuiry O, Pedroli E, Simoens X, Balique JG. Les sutures mécaniques. Pharm. Hosp 1990;(101):7-15.

[19] M'ardle, J.S. The position of Murphy's button in modern surgery. Trans RAM Ireland 1900*,* 18**:**145.

[20] Jamshidi R, Stephenson JT, Clay JG, Pichakron KO, Harrison MR. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2009, 44(1):

[21] Yao L, Li C, Zhu X, Shao Y, Meng S, Shi L, Wang H. An Effective New

616-623.

Scharzenberg; 1987.

Masson; 1985.

24(7): 224-8.

37(4):263-267.

222-228.

[2] Halsted XS. Circular suture of the intestine. An experimental study.

[3] Jourdan P. Sutures en un plan des tuniques digestives. Position actuelle.

[4] Orr NW. A single-layer intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1969;56:771-4.

Hardwick CE. Ten years' experience of a single-layer anastomosis in colonic surgery. Am J Surg 1956;92:222-7.

[7] Murphy JB. Intestinal approximation,

Ungarischen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Budapest. Mai 1908. Pester Med Chir

[5] Gambee LP, Garnjobst W,

[6] Everett WG. A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg

with special reference to the use of the anastomosis button. Lancet

[8] Hultl 2nd H. Kongress der

[9] Von Petz A. Aseptic technique of stomach resections. Ann Surg

[10] Nakayama K. Simplification of the Bilroth I gastric resection. Surgery

[11] Androssov PI. Experience in the application of the instrumental mechanical suture in surgery of the stomach and rectum. Acta Chir Scand

[12] F.M. Steichen. Naissance des sutures mécaniques modernes en chirurgie:

1909;45:108 [10,121-2]

1927;86:338-43.

1954;35:837-41.

1970;136:57-63.

**References**

Pathol 1826; 2:101.

J 1887;103:245-7.

1975;62:135-40.

1894;2:621.

J Chir 1965;90:649-55.

[39] Hintz GC, Alshehri A, Bell CM, Butterworth SA. Stapled versus handsewn pediatric intestinal anastomoses: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2018, 53:959-963.

[40] Schineis et al. stapled intestinal anastomoses are more cost effective than hand-sewn anastomoses in a diagnosis related group system. The Surgeon 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. surge.2020.09.002

**37**

**2. Fever**

**Chapter 5**

**Abstract**

**1. Introduction**

Postoperative Follow-Up and

*Stelian Stefanita Mogoanta, Stefan Paitici*

ment, the use of antibiotics and thrombotic event prophylaxis.

*and Carmen Aurelia Mogoanta*

Recovery after Abdominal Surgery

Postoperative patient care has several components: - surveillance, − prevention of complications associated with surgical disease or other preexisting comorbidities, − specific postoperative treatment of the surgical disease and its complications. While these distinctions are purely didactic, the postoperative care merges into an active surveillance with a higher level of standardization than it would seem at first glance. Computing, interpreting and integrating signs and symptoms with active search of proofs by lab tests or other paraclinical explorations highly depends on skills and dedication of the entire healthcare team. Those attributes gained through continuous theoretical preparation but validated by current practice bring added value, always in favor of the patients' best interests. In this chapter, we propose to explore the main clinical and paraclinical means and tools that can improve the outcomes of surgical procedures for a faster and safer recovery. We will also discuss the need for different types of surgical bed drains placement and their manage-

**Keywords:** postoperative, follow-up, surgery, complication, prophylaxis, treatment

The surgical act, defined as the time that a surgeon effectively operates on the patient, remains the center of surgical therapy, however, it is increasingly clear that the preoperative and more importantly the postoperative care can enhance or unfortunately compromise the results of a technically successful surgery. For reducing the mortality and morbidity rates in the postoperative period, it is crucial to identify risk factors, prevent and treat as soon as possible any deviation of the patient state from the normal rehabilitation course. Timely interventions reduce the impact of the negative events in the patient's recovery. Early recognition of signs and symptoms by close surveillance is the key and starting point for active surveillance. This allows targeted lab testing or imaging (if needed) to rapidly identify any

undesired event in patient recovery and allow for specific and proper action.

specific parameter, is one of the most important and easy to monitor.

To monitor the operated patient, we have at our disposal the clinical and paraclinical parameters. The patient's **temperature,** despite being a general and non-

#### **Chapter 5**

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

[39] Hintz GC, Alshehri A, Bell CM, Butterworth SA. Stapled versus handsewn pediatric intestinal anastomoses: a retrospective cohort study. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2018, 53:959-963.

[40] Schineis et al. stapled intestinal anastomoses are more cost effective than hand-sewn anastomoses in a diagnosis related group system. The Surgeon 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.

surge.2020.09.002

**36**

## Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery

*Stelian Stefanita Mogoanta, Stefan Paitici and Carmen Aurelia Mogoanta*

#### **Abstract**

Postoperative patient care has several components: - surveillance, − prevention of complications associated with surgical disease or other preexisting comorbidities, − specific postoperative treatment of the surgical disease and its complications. While these distinctions are purely didactic, the postoperative care merges into an active surveillance with a higher level of standardization than it would seem at first glance. Computing, interpreting and integrating signs and symptoms with active search of proofs by lab tests or other paraclinical explorations highly depends on skills and dedication of the entire healthcare team. Those attributes gained through continuous theoretical preparation but validated by current practice bring added value, always in favor of the patients' best interests. In this chapter, we propose to explore the main clinical and paraclinical means and tools that can improve the outcomes of surgical procedures for a faster and safer recovery. We will also discuss the need for different types of surgical bed drains placement and their management, the use of antibiotics and thrombotic event prophylaxis.

**Keywords:** postoperative, follow-up, surgery, complication, prophylaxis, treatment

#### **1. Introduction**

The surgical act, defined as the time that a surgeon effectively operates on the patient, remains the center of surgical therapy, however, it is increasingly clear that the preoperative and more importantly the postoperative care can enhance or unfortunately compromise the results of a technically successful surgery. For reducing the mortality and morbidity rates in the postoperative period, it is crucial to identify risk factors, prevent and treat as soon as possible any deviation of the patient state from the normal rehabilitation course. Timely interventions reduce the impact of the negative events in the patient's recovery. Early recognition of signs and symptoms by close surveillance is the key and starting point for active surveillance. This allows targeted lab testing or imaging (if needed) to rapidly identify any undesired event in patient recovery and allow for specific and proper action.

#### **2. Fever**

To monitor the operated patient, we have at our disposal the clinical and paraclinical parameters. The patient's **temperature,** despite being a general and nonspecific parameter, is one of the most important and easy to monitor.

During the follow-up period of the surgical patient, the temperature is usually measured at least twice a day, in the morning and in the afternoon, and whenever there is a suspicion of fever. The determinations are included in the observation sheet completing the temperature graph whose oscillations become suggestive in a clinical context. A single febrile rise, below 38 degrees Celsius can often be caused by the resorption of blood degradation products from the operative wound or secondary to the excessive maintenance of a drainage tube, without major pathological significance [1]. However, the persistence of the fever with the configuration of "saw teeth" on the thermal chart suggests the development of a septic process. The first to be checked is the surgical site, then the lung and urinary system, as these are the most frequent sites of infection after surgery. Particular attention should be paid to the occult causes of fever such as endocarditis, phlebitis, lamellar atelectasis that should be systematically searched for in the context of an unjustified febrile syndrome with an apparently good evolution in the operative site. In a large cohort study [2], the most common causes of fever development were stratified a few days after surgery. On the day of surgery, cardiac pathology and specific myocardial infarction seem to be the most common, then pulmonary pathology – pneumonia and atelectasis seem to cause fever in days 1–3 postoperatively. Urinary infections usually occur in 2–3 days postoperatively but can also begin later. From day 4 to 30 postoperatively, superficial or profound surgical site infections become the main cause for fever development, while thrombosis can cause fever at any time between the day of surgery and postoperative day 30. When the febrile ascension appears suddenly on the fifth day after surgery, without signs of wound infection anastomosis dehiscence should be suspected, however, it can also be caused by thrombophlebitis. Therefore, we can conclude that fever is a general sign that should always be interpreted in accordance with other signs and symptoms but it is an alarming sign that should lead to careful and complete physical examination and laboratory tests or imaging studies evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

#### **3. Supervision of the cardiovascular system**

Cardiovascular system stability is crucial in the postoperative evolution of the patient. Complex surveillance is needed in many cases and the rehabilitation measures must be intensive and prompt, conducted in most cases by the intensive care specialist or cardiologist. However, the surgeon must be prepared to recognize cardiac risks and main syndromes and even manage the patient until one of the above mentioned specialists are available.

**Heart rate is** systematically monitored several times a day. Immediately postoperatively, the pulse rate is usually higher than normal with a decreased amplitude, may be justified by intra operative blood loss, which may remain insignificant in the overall economy of the patient's healing, or by anesthetic drugs, the extent of surgical "aggressiveness", pain, etc. As these factors are progressively corrected, the heart rate should return to normal. Additional oxygen administration can help achieve a faster normal rate as it improves tissue oxygenation [3]. It is very important to compare the pulse frequency with the values noted preoperatively taking into account the patient's underlying pathology (thyroid, heart, etc.). The pulse with increasing frequency from one determination to another, with a small amplitude that becomes progressively filiform, associated with hypotension in a sweaty and pale patient, may be caused by a bleeding at the operating site (which is not always in the drain tube or in the container); this may require analysis of reoperation for hemostatic purposes. Tachycardia with low pulse amplitude and a decrease in blood pressure that occurs on days 4–6 postoperatively, may indicate a septic complication or

**39**

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*

anastomosis dehiscence. On the other hand, bradycardia is however associated with increased cardiac, pulmonary, renal and pain-related morbidity at 3 and 5 days after surgery [4]. The discovery of arrhythmias whether extrasystolic or atrial fibrillation as a new event, requires rapid correction of ionic and hydric imbalances and the search for a septic process, the most likely causes in this context. Both bradycardia

**Blood pressure** is determined at least twice a day. The recorded values are interpreted in a dynamic clinical context, always compared with the normal values of the patient determined preoperatively. Low blood pressure levels can be found immediately postoperatively, in conditions of shock, dehydration, bleeding or heart failure, etc. All these causes of low blood pressure require immediate and accurate diagnosis and correction as they bring increased mortality [6]. Elevated blood pressure levels occur especially in patients with a history of hypertension in the context of an exaggerated postoperative catecholamine reaction, fluid overload or inadequate pain control. When they exceed certain values, beyond physiological variations, both increases and decreases in blood pressure values must be promptly corrected to prevent cerebral or cardiac events or ischemia of a recent anastomosis [7, 8]. Due to the high complexity of the measures required, it is recommended that an unstable cardiovascular patient be transferred to the intensive care unit and

The quality of respiratory function has a major impact on the patient's postoperative recovery, especially after major surgery. Immediately postoperatively, the anesthetist cleans the oropharyngeal and orotracheal cavities by suction to evacuate excessive secretions; this should be done easily so as not to increase or trigger local inflammation and spasm. Additional oxygen administration (via facemask or nasal tube) is recommended to reduce the effort of the respiratory muscles. In patients with ventilatory deficit, a high back position of 30–40 degrees can be adopted [9]; this improves respiratory dynamics and promotes the drainage of secretions [10]. For this purpose, back percussion is usually performed several times a day with the patient in sitting position, followed by respiratory toilet. The patient is encouraged to take deep breaths in order to relax and open the alveolar spaces thus reducing the ventilation "dead spaces" [9–11]. Under conditions of tracheobronchial fluid overload with excessive secretions, expectorants and mucolytics may be administered [12]; this improves drainage and reduces the effort of coughing. In such conditions, the patient is encouraged to cough in a controlled and effective manner, with the protection of the abdomen [13] (the most common site of surgery) either by gentle external pressure exerted by patient, doctor or nurse (as appropriate), or by using means of abdominal restraint like girdles. Prolonged, inefficient coughing may result in undue strain and tension on the surgical wounds, increasing the risk of evisceration or eventration. Aerosol solutions can be very useful [14] administered 2–3 times a day by nebulization for 5–10 minutes helps to "dry" or "thin" of the secretions as needed. It should be noted that postoperative pneumonia is one of the most common causes of significant morbidity and mortality after major surgery [9–11]. Prophylactic or therapeutic antibiotic therapy may not protect the patient from such a complication if excessive secretions remain undrained in the tracheobronchial tree [15]. The impact of a deficient oxygenation is systemic [16, 17], manifested at the level of the operative site (with the hypooxygenation of an anastomosis for example), at the cardiac level (decompensation of an ischemic heart disease), cerebral, etc. However supplemental oxygen should not be

and arrythmias always require a postoperative cardiac consult [4, 5].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

evaluated by a cardiologist [8].

**4. Respiratory surveillance and care**

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

tests or imaging studies evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Cardiovascular system stability is crucial in the postoperative evolution of the patient. Complex surveillance is needed in many cases and the rehabilitation measures must be intensive and prompt, conducted in most cases by the intensive care specialist or cardiologist. However, the surgeon must be prepared to recognize cardiac risks and main syndromes and even manage the patient until one of the

**Heart rate is** systematically monitored several times a day. Immediately postoperatively, the pulse rate is usually higher than normal with a decreased amplitude, may be justified by intra operative blood loss, which may remain insignificant in the overall economy of the patient's healing, or by anesthetic drugs, the extent of surgical "aggressiveness", pain, etc. As these factors are progressively corrected, the heart rate should return to normal. Additional oxygen administration can help achieve a faster normal rate as it improves tissue oxygenation [3]. It is very important to compare the pulse frequency with the values noted preoperatively taking into account the patient's underlying pathology (thyroid, heart, etc.). The pulse with increasing frequency from one determination to another, with a small amplitude that becomes progressively filiform, associated with hypotension in a sweaty and pale patient, may be caused by a bleeding at the operating site (which is not always in the drain tube or in the container); this may require analysis of reoperation for hemostatic purposes. Tachycardia with low pulse amplitude and a decrease in blood pressure that occurs on days 4–6 postoperatively, may indicate a septic complication or

**3. Supervision of the cardiovascular system**

above mentioned specialists are available.

During the follow-up period of the surgical patient, the temperature is usually measured at least twice a day, in the morning and in the afternoon, and whenever there is a suspicion of fever. The determinations are included in the observation sheet completing the temperature graph whose oscillations become suggestive in a clinical context. A single febrile rise, below 38 degrees Celsius can often be caused by the resorption of blood degradation products from the operative wound or secondary to the excessive maintenance of a drainage tube, without major pathological significance [1]. However, the persistence of the fever with the configuration of "saw teeth" on the thermal chart suggests the development of a septic process. The first to be checked is the surgical site, then the lung and urinary system, as these are the most frequent sites of infection after surgery. Particular attention should be paid to the occult causes of fever such as endocarditis, phlebitis, lamellar atelectasis that should be systematically searched for in the context of an unjustified febrile syndrome with an apparently good evolution in the operative site. In a large cohort study [2], the most common causes of fever development were stratified a few days after surgery. On the day of surgery, cardiac pathology and specific myocardial infarction seem to be the most common, then pulmonary pathology – pneumonia and atelectasis seem to cause fever in days 1–3 postoperatively. Urinary infections usually occur in 2–3 days postoperatively but can also begin later. From day 4 to 30 postoperatively, superficial or profound surgical site infections become the main cause for fever development, while thrombosis can cause fever at any time between the day of surgery and postoperative day 30. When the febrile ascension appears suddenly on the fifth day after surgery, without signs of wound infection anastomosis dehiscence should be suspected, however, it can also be caused by thrombophlebitis. Therefore, we can conclude that fever is a general sign that should always be interpreted in accordance with other signs and symptoms but it is an alarming sign that should lead to careful and complete physical examination and laboratory

**38**

anastomosis dehiscence. On the other hand, bradycardia is however associated with increased cardiac, pulmonary, renal and pain-related morbidity at 3 and 5 days after surgery [4]. The discovery of arrhythmias whether extrasystolic or atrial fibrillation as a new event, requires rapid correction of ionic and hydric imbalances and the search for a septic process, the most likely causes in this context. Both bradycardia and arrythmias always require a postoperative cardiac consult [4, 5].

**Blood pressure** is determined at least twice a day. The recorded values are interpreted in a dynamic clinical context, always compared with the normal values of the patient determined preoperatively. Low blood pressure levels can be found immediately postoperatively, in conditions of shock, dehydration, bleeding or heart failure, etc. All these causes of low blood pressure require immediate and accurate diagnosis and correction as they bring increased mortality [6]. Elevated blood pressure levels occur especially in patients with a history of hypertension in the context of an exaggerated postoperative catecholamine reaction, fluid overload or inadequate pain control. When they exceed certain values, beyond physiological variations, both increases and decreases in blood pressure values must be promptly corrected to prevent cerebral or cardiac events or ischemia of a recent anastomosis [7, 8]. Due to the high complexity of the measures required, it is recommended that an unstable cardiovascular patient be transferred to the intensive care unit and evaluated by a cardiologist [8].

#### **4. Respiratory surveillance and care**

The quality of respiratory function has a major impact on the patient's postoperative recovery, especially after major surgery. Immediately postoperatively, the anesthetist cleans the oropharyngeal and orotracheal cavities by suction to evacuate excessive secretions; this should be done easily so as not to increase or trigger local inflammation and spasm. Additional oxygen administration (via facemask or nasal tube) is recommended to reduce the effort of the respiratory muscles. In patients with ventilatory deficit, a high back position of 30–40 degrees can be adopted [9]; this improves respiratory dynamics and promotes the drainage of secretions [10]. For this purpose, back percussion is usually performed several times a day with the patient in sitting position, followed by respiratory toilet. The patient is encouraged to take deep breaths in order to relax and open the alveolar spaces thus reducing the ventilation "dead spaces" [9–11]. Under conditions of tracheobronchial fluid overload with excessive secretions, expectorants and mucolytics may be administered [12]; this improves drainage and reduces the effort of coughing. In such conditions, the patient is encouraged to cough in a controlled and effective manner, with the protection of the abdomen [13] (the most common site of surgery) either by gentle external pressure exerted by patient, doctor or nurse (as appropriate), or by using means of abdominal restraint like girdles. Prolonged, inefficient coughing may result in undue strain and tension on the surgical wounds, increasing the risk of evisceration or eventration. Aerosol solutions can be very useful [14] administered 2–3 times a day by nebulization for 5–10 minutes helps to "dry" or "thin" of the secretions as needed. It should be noted that postoperative pneumonia is one of the most common causes of significant morbidity and mortality after major surgery [9–11]. Prophylactic or therapeutic antibiotic therapy may not protect the patient from such a complication if excessive secretions remain undrained in the tracheobronchial tree [15]. The impact of a deficient oxygenation is systemic [16, 17], manifested at the level of the operative site (with the hypooxygenation of an anastomosis for example), at the cardiac level (decompensation of an ischemic heart disease), cerebral, etc. However supplemental oxygen should not be

administered on a regular basis, but only when the oximetry drops under 90–92%, due to secondary risks of hyperoxia [18, 19]. The presence of prolonged, productive cough, especially when associated with fever and altered general condition, becomes an indication for a chest X-ray in order to capture changes responsible for the occurrence of this symptomatology and take appropriate measures [20, 21]. In this context, the findings suggest that pneumonia is a strong indication for antibiotic therapy. Irritant cough associated with sore throat and hoarseness, reported by the patient, are elements that draw attention to a digestive reflux with secondary aspiration in the airways and glottis irritation. The situation is not unusual in conditions of prolonged postoperative intestinal paresis. In such cases, the first goal is to combat gastric stasis and hyper pressure and the most rapid way is by placing a nasogastric decompression tube. If we already have a nasogastric tube in position, we need to ensure its permanent patency because the tube can be obstructed with cloths, fibrin deposits partially digested food or gastric mucosa. Otherwise, the tube becomes a reflux promoting factor by keeping the cardia open and incompetent [22]. Concurrently adopting a semi-sitting position (maintained also during sleep) to prevent or reduce reflux is an extremely useful element in combating Mendelson's syndrome (aspiration of the digestive fluid with acid content in the patient airways).

#### **5. Surveillance of the excretory system**

It is usually done by tracking the quantity and quality of urine output over a given time and more importantly in 24 hours. All patients undergoing medium and major abdominal surgery usually have a urinary catheter placed under anesthesia [23]. Catheter placement should be performed under sterile conditions, usually in preanesthetic room or on-table [24] to avoid infection, bladder injury during surgery, and to accurately monitor renal function during surgery. There are numerous causes of acute kidney injury or otherwise low urine output in the perioperative period, the risk being reported up to 5–10% in surgical patients [25]. In the immediate postoperative setting, low flow and concentrated urine indicate a good renal function but poor hydration of the patient or a state of shock due to blood loss or impaired cardiovascular function. Decreased urinary flow that occurs under conditions of proper hydration and previously normal renal function may be an indicator of fluid retention in the setting of third spacing, abdominal compartment syndrome or blood transfusions adverse reactions [10, 25]. If this event occurs within 4 to 6 days postoperatively, it is usually secondary to the development of fistular or suppurative complications at the site of surgery, alerting the surgeon and allowing a prompt diagnosis of the complication. Failure to recognize the causes and the attempt to obtain adequate diuresis can lead to overloading the patient with fluids; this impairs the function of all the systems up to acute pulmonary edema or cardiac decompensation by increased preload.

Hyperchromic urine also occurs in conditions of mechanical jaundice when the urine turns intensely yellow to brown due to the renal elimination of soluble bile pigments [26]. The presence of large amounts of urobilinogen in urine usually indicates the hemolytic or hepatocellular nature of jaundice. Hematuria is the evacuation of blood into the urine. Bleeding can be located at any level of the urinary tract from the kidneys to the urethra and usually denotes an intraoperative lesion or clotting disorder. Hematuria can be microscopic and constantly appears after pelvic or retroperitoneal surgery [27] or macroscopic - when the red color of the urine is obvious, sometimes with deposits and blood clots to the point of obvious blood (Gross hematuria). Usually, hematuria caused by minor intraoperative

**41**

patient's weight.

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*

irreversible renal failure by blocking glomerular filtration.

urinary catheter should be left in place for at least 10–14 days.

lesions or produced at the placement of the urethro-bladder catheter is self-limiting. Persistent hematuria requires a complete specialist diagnosis. Hemoglobinuria defines hyperchromic urine, purple to dark brown that occurs during major hemolysis after transfusion accidents [28]. Early recognition is extremely important because if undiagnosed and subsequently untreated, it can precipitate acute

The proper timing of catheter removal is debatable, numerous studies and metanalyses have addressed this question as the risk of urinary infections increases with the duration of catheterization. For abdominal surgery that does not involve the genitourinary systems or pelvic surgery it seems that the optimal timing of catheter removal is the first postoperative day [29] which in most cases coincides with the time when the patient becomes ambulatory. However, for major surgery (extensive dissection, usually for cancer) involving the pelvic organs or requiring a longer period of immobilization, the catheterization period can be extended to 3–6 days or even longer, adapted to the clinical needs [29]. For instance, whenever the bladder is sutured (after iatrogenic lesions or deliberated partial resection) the

The digestive system is the most common surgical site in general surgery, hence the special attention paid to its care. Systematic clinical examination can provide valuable information about the patient's progress, adapting postoperative measures

Usually forgotten or neglected, oral cavity inspection provides information about the patient's hydration level; dry oral mucosa, for instance, requires an increase in fluid intake. The presence of whitish deposits on the lingual mucosa may suggest candidiasis infection caused by prolonged antibiotic use, while red depapillated glossy mucosa suggests iron deficiency. Toileting of the oral cavity by brushing and washing with antiseptic solutions is almost as important as postoperative wound care, as germs ingested at this level colonize and contaminate the lower levels of the digestive tract accentuating dysmicrobism and promoting complications. Moreover, pathogens in the oral cavity can colonize the lung and lead to postoperative pneumonia with increased morbidity and mortality [30]. Until the patient is able to exercise basic hygiene, the task must be performed systematically

Pain therapy. Pain is one of the main factors that can delay the recovery of the operated patient. Pain delays the patient's mobilization, limits the range of motion of the diaphragm, delays the resumption of intestinal transit, and psychologically stresses the patient. Postoperative pain therapy begins during surgery, avoiding excessive traction, tension in the sutures or unjustified extensive dissections outside anatomic planes. From this point of view, laparoscopic surgery and generally mini-invasive surgery, whenever possible, brings major advantages. Also, a very important role in combating pain is the positioning of the patient in bed after surgery. The patient should be positioned as comfortably as possible, avoiding tension on the muscles around the incision areas. The movement of the patient in bed after surgery should not be forbidden; on the contrary the patient should be encouraged to adopt the position in which the pain is minimal and to change his/her position periodically. Beds with semi-rigid elastic mattresses are preferable, which can provide the patient with effective support to achieve active movements and which evenly distribute the

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

**6. Digestive system surveillance**

for an eventless and rapid recovery.

by the medical personnel.

#### *Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

airways).

administered on a regular basis, but only when the oximetry drops under 90–92%, due to secondary risks of hyperoxia [18, 19]. The presence of prolonged, productive cough, especially when associated with fever and altered general condition, becomes an indication for a chest X-ray in order to capture changes responsible for the occurrence of this symptomatology and take appropriate measures [20, 21]. In this context, the findings suggest that pneumonia is a strong indication for antibiotic therapy. Irritant cough associated with sore throat and hoarseness, reported by the patient, are elements that draw attention to a digestive reflux with secondary aspiration in the airways and glottis irritation. The situation is not unusual in conditions of prolonged postoperative intestinal paresis. In such cases, the first goal is to combat gastric stasis and hyper pressure and the most rapid way is by placing a nasogastric decompression tube. If we already have a nasogastric tube in position, we need to ensure its permanent patency because the tube can be obstructed with cloths, fibrin deposits partially digested food or gastric mucosa. Otherwise, the tube becomes a reflux promoting factor by keeping the cardia open and incompetent [22]. Concurrently adopting a semi-sitting position (maintained also during sleep) to prevent or reduce reflux is an extremely useful element in combating Mendelson's

syndrome (aspiration of the digestive fluid with acid content in the patient

It is usually done by tracking the quantity and quality of urine output over a given time and more importantly in 24 hours. All patients undergoing medium and major abdominal surgery usually have a urinary catheter placed under anesthesia [23]. Catheter placement should be performed under sterile conditions, usually in preanesthetic room or on-table [24] to avoid infection, bladder injury during surgery, and to accurately monitor renal function during surgery. There are numerous causes of acute kidney injury or otherwise low urine output in the perioperative period, the risk being reported up to 5–10% in surgical patients [25]. In the immediate postoperative setting, low flow and concentrated urine indicate a good renal function but poor hydration of the patient or a state of shock due to blood loss or impaired cardiovascular function. Decreased urinary flow that occurs under conditions of proper hydration and previously normal renal function may be an indicator of fluid retention in the setting of third spacing, abdominal compartment syndrome or blood transfusions adverse reactions [10, 25]. If this event occurs within 4 to 6 days postoperatively, it is usually secondary to the development of fistular or suppurative complications at the site of surgery, alerting the surgeon and allowing a prompt diagnosis of the complication. Failure to recognize the causes and the attempt to obtain adequate diuresis can lead to overloading the patient with fluids; this impairs the function of all the systems up to acute pulmonary edema or

Hyperchromic urine also occurs in conditions of mechanical jaundice when the urine turns intensely yellow to brown due to the renal elimination of soluble bile pigments [26]. The presence of large amounts of urobilinogen in urine usually indicates the hemolytic or hepatocellular nature of jaundice. Hematuria is the evacuation of blood into the urine. Bleeding can be located at any level of the urinary tract from the kidneys to the urethra and usually denotes an intraoperative lesion or clotting disorder. Hematuria can be microscopic and constantly appears after pelvic or retroperitoneal surgery [27] or macroscopic - when the red color of the urine is obvious, sometimes with deposits and blood clots to the point of obvious blood (Gross hematuria). Usually, hematuria caused by minor intraoperative

**5. Surveillance of the excretory system**

cardiac decompensation by increased preload.

**40**

lesions or produced at the placement of the urethro-bladder catheter is self-limiting. Persistent hematuria requires a complete specialist diagnosis. Hemoglobinuria defines hyperchromic urine, purple to dark brown that occurs during major hemolysis after transfusion accidents [28]. Early recognition is extremely important because if undiagnosed and subsequently untreated, it can precipitate acute irreversible renal failure by blocking glomerular filtration.

The proper timing of catheter removal is debatable, numerous studies and metanalyses have addressed this question as the risk of urinary infections increases with the duration of catheterization. For abdominal surgery that does not involve the genitourinary systems or pelvic surgery it seems that the optimal timing of catheter removal is the first postoperative day [29] which in most cases coincides with the time when the patient becomes ambulatory. However, for major surgery (extensive dissection, usually for cancer) involving the pelvic organs or requiring a longer period of immobilization, the catheterization period can be extended to 3–6 days or even longer, adapted to the clinical needs [29]. For instance, whenever the bladder is sutured (after iatrogenic lesions or deliberated partial resection) the urinary catheter should be left in place for at least 10–14 days.

#### **6. Digestive system surveillance**

The digestive system is the most common surgical site in general surgery, hence the special attention paid to its care. Systematic clinical examination can provide valuable information about the patient's progress, adapting postoperative measures for an eventless and rapid recovery.

Usually forgotten or neglected, oral cavity inspection provides information about the patient's hydration level; dry oral mucosa, for instance, requires an increase in fluid intake. The presence of whitish deposits on the lingual mucosa may suggest candidiasis infection caused by prolonged antibiotic use, while red depapillated glossy mucosa suggests iron deficiency. Toileting of the oral cavity by brushing and washing with antiseptic solutions is almost as important as postoperative wound care, as germs ingested at this level colonize and contaminate the lower levels of the digestive tract accentuating dysmicrobism and promoting complications. Moreover, pathogens in the oral cavity can colonize the lung and lead to postoperative pneumonia with increased morbidity and mortality [30]. Until the patient is able to exercise basic hygiene, the task must be performed systematically by the medical personnel.

Pain therapy. Pain is one of the main factors that can delay the recovery of the operated patient. Pain delays the patient's mobilization, limits the range of motion of the diaphragm, delays the resumption of intestinal transit, and psychologically stresses the patient. Postoperative pain therapy begins during surgery, avoiding excessive traction, tension in the sutures or unjustified extensive dissections outside anatomic planes. From this point of view, laparoscopic surgery and generally mini-invasive surgery, whenever possible, brings major advantages. Also, a very important role in combating pain is the positioning of the patient in bed after surgery. The patient should be positioned as comfortably as possible, avoiding tension on the muscles around the incision areas. The movement of the patient in bed after surgery should not be forbidden; on the contrary the patient should be encouraged to adopt the position in which the pain is minimal and to change his/her position periodically. Beds with semi-rigid elastic mattresses are preferable, which can provide the patient with effective support to achieve active movements and which evenly distribute the patient's weight.

The abdomen should be examined at least twice a day. In the first 24 hours after surgery, the patient may complain of low to moderate pain in the abdomen, accentuated by active movements or coughing. The pain must be combated accordingly, in order to avoid the development of the "fear" of mobilization. Pain therapy must be adjusted to the extent of surgery and known mechanisms of pain. Multimodal postoperative analgesia appears to provide better outcomes [31]. Usually, the combination of acetaminophen with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug is sufficient for most patients, but in some cases, local analgesia [32], or even patient-controlled epidural analgesia may be needed. In case of prolonged use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), prophylaxis of gastroduodenal disorders like erosions, hemorrhage or ulcers should be considered, especially if the patient's oral feeding has been temporarily suspended. In those cases, proton pump inhibitors and E-prostaglandin analogs seem to be the most effective, then the histamine receptors antagonists, while barrier agents are mostly useless since they do not interfere with the pathogeny of NSAID-induced ulcer. However, proton pump inhibitors are to be diverted in patients with a current or recent history of antibiotherapy, since the two conditions act synergically favouring severe *Clostridium difficile* colitis [33]. The use of major opioid analgesics is not indicated because it contributes to the accentuation of intestinal paresis and favors the accumulation of tracheobronchial secretions [34]. There are combinations of painkillers (analgesics) that combine a non-steroidal antiinflammatory and an opioid in low concentrations where the side effects are absent or negligible. In the context of intense pain that does not yield to milder painkillers, it is recommended to place an epidural catheter to ensure the effective analgesia administration with minimal effects on the intestinal smooth muscles [35, 36].

The inspection of the abdomen helps in monitoring the degree of distension of the abdomen due to the accumulation of gases and fluids in the digestive tract lumen. This condition is mainly caused by the absence of peristalsis but also by the change of microbiome. Postoperative paresis, present after interventions involving or exposing the intestinal loops, must be actively prevented. Prevention can and should begin in the preoperative period and continue in the operating room and beyond. The very important measures are related to the optimum hydration and correction of the electrolyte imbalances. Because - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery - (ERAS) protocols have been progressively adopted, the patient is usually advised to avoid starving in the preoperative period and to have a light liquid diet in the evening, before scheduled operation. Clear fluid diet is allowed up to 2 hours preoperatively [37]. Specific medications – prokinetics - like anticholinesterases and parasympathomimetics may be prescribed in order to stimulate peristalsis [38]. Neostigmine, a synthetic anticholinesterase alkaloid, stimulates intestinal peristalsis with less extensive side effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems [39]. Local-acting intestinal peristaltic stimulants, such as castor oil may be administered orally or introduced through the nasogastric tube (NGT). Prolonged paresis requires the placement of an NG-tube for decompression of the digestive tract, prevention of vomiting and airway aspiration or Mendelson's syndrome. We do not usually use nasogastric decompression tube, but only in emergency surgery and just in cases associated with high fluid and gas distension or in cases with expected prolonged ileus [40].

Various methods of reducing postoperative ileus have been studied. It seems that something as simple as abdominal massage after colonic surgery can reduce the postoperative pain and help resume intestinal transit [41]. Similarly, numerous studies including a metanalysis advocate for the use of chewing gum in order to reduce the ileus period [42] but the results have been contradicted by other studies [43]. Chewing gum is adopted by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as a measure that could reduce ileus [37]; we recommend its selective use whenever applicable.

**43**

interventions.

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*

Commonly used opioids such as morphine and fentanyl can prolong the postoperative ileus, by acting like agonists on mu receptors; it is recommended to reduce their use at least in the postoperative settings. In contrast, some kappa agonists like fedotozine U-50, 488H, bremazocine or asimadoline appear to reduce ileus in

For the lower digestive tract surgery, the placement of a transanal gas tube may be used, in order to evacuate the increased pressures that may develop at this level [46]. The procedure is safe and very effective especially in low rectal anastomosis [47]. The transanal tube (TAT), usually 28–30 CH (Charrierre), is placed at the end of the procedure foiled in greased gauze and is primarily used for intraoperative leakage test. The tube is usually left in place for 48 hours or more, accordingly to the patient evolution. The TAT seems to reduce anastomotic leakage (AL), the need for re-interventions for AL, and it is proposed by some authors for the reduction of defunctioning stoma [48]. After interventions that do not involve the colon, an evacuation enema may be performed at 2–3 days postoperatively; this reduces stasis and microbial load at this level, and stimulate the resumption

Close patient surveillance with abdominal palpation is required in order to take and adapt the appropriate postoperative measures. Palpation aims to detect possible areas of deep tenderness and infiltration in the abdomen, painful areas in which any discrete signs of peritoneal irritation draw attention to the occurrence of a complication. The jerky palpation may show flapping, a sign with great specificity for postoperative occlusive syndrome, especially when the patient has initially resumed intestinal transit. Percussion highlights diffuse tympanism during intestinal paresis, while persistent localized hypersonority in an area after hesitant resumption of intestinal transit may draw attention to a complication that may have developed at this level. Auscultating the abdomen can reveal a silent abdomen during the paretic period or vice versa- vivid noises, accompanied by whistling and crackling, an expression of the "struggle" of a loop to overcome a distal obstacle/ obstruction. Anastomotic leakage is the most feared complication because it comes with significant morbidity and mortality in short but also in long term [49]. The earlier the recognition of an anastomotic leakage the better and prompter measures can be taken in order to limit or avoid major morbidity [50]. Postoperative peritonitis following an anastomotic leakage usually develops quietly and may remain undetected since the patient is on pain-killers and the peritoneal surface is less reactive after surgical aggression. CT scan can be falsely negative for anastomotic leakage in fairly large number of cases, therefore, in such cases, it is advisable to take action on first clinical signs of peritonism [51]. Measures may include various combinations of relaparotomy, percutaneous drainage, postoperative wound opening, antibiotics and complete parenteral nutrition. Earlier detection of the underlying pathology result in prompt intervention and therefore better outcomes [52]. In cases of diffuse peritonitis, relaparotomy is mandatory to remove the peritoneal contamination and try to gain control of its source. There is no ideal solution for controlling anastomotic leakage. In some cases, re-resection and anastomotic reconstruction can be an option depending on the local and general conditions. In some cases, the anastomosis may be suppressed, followed by closure of the distal end, while the proximal partner is exteriorized in a stoma. This seems to be the safest approach but it is not always feasible. In other cases, perianastomotic drainage might be enough [53], but usually a proximal diverting stoma is advisable in addition to local drainage. The decision is highly dependent on the surgeon's experience who should always thoroughly evaluate the local and general condition of the patient; it also depends on ICU level, and the local feasibility of endoscopic stenting, interventional radiology, and other

animal models studies but have never entered clinical practice [44, 45].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

of normal peristalsis.

#### *Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

The abdomen should be examined at least twice a day. In the first 24 hours after surgery, the patient may complain of low to moderate pain in the abdomen, accentuated by active movements or coughing. The pain must be combated accordingly, in order to avoid the development of the "fear" of mobilization. Pain therapy must be adjusted to the extent of surgery and known mechanisms of pain. Multimodal postoperative analgesia appears to provide better outcomes [31]. Usually, the combination of acetaminophen with a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug is sufficient for most patients, but in some cases, local analgesia [32], or even patient-controlled epidural analgesia may be needed. In case of prolonged use of non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID), prophylaxis of gastroduodenal disorders like erosions, hemorrhage or ulcers should be considered, especially if the patient's oral feeding has been temporarily suspended. In those cases, proton pump inhibitors and E-prostaglandin analogs seem to be the most effective, then the histamine receptors antagonists, while barrier agents are mostly useless since they do not interfere with the pathogeny of NSAID-induced ulcer. However, proton pump inhibitors are to be diverted in patients with a current or recent history of antibiotherapy, since the two conditions act synergically favouring severe *Clostridium difficile* colitis [33]. The use of major opioid analgesics is not indicated because it contributes to the accentuation of intestinal paresis and favors the accumulation of tracheobronchial secretions [34]. There are combinations of painkillers (analgesics) that combine a non-steroidal antiinflammatory and an opioid in low concentrations where the side effects are absent or negligible. In the context of intense pain that does not yield to milder painkillers, it is recommended to place an epidural catheter to ensure the effective analgesia administration with minimal effects on the intestinal smooth muscles [35, 36]. The inspection of the abdomen helps in monitoring the degree of distension of the abdomen due to the accumulation of gases and fluids in the digestive tract lumen. This condition is mainly caused by the absence of peristalsis but also by the change of microbiome. Postoperative paresis, present after interventions involving or exposing the intestinal loops, must be actively prevented. Prevention can and should begin in the preoperative period and continue in the operating room and beyond. The very important measures are related to the optimum hydration and correction of the electrolyte imbalances. Because - Enhanced Recovery After Surgery - (ERAS) protocols have been progressively adopted, the patient is usually advised to avoid starving in the preoperative period and to have a light liquid diet in the evening, before scheduled operation. Clear fluid diet is allowed up to 2 hours preoperatively [37]. Specific medications – prokinetics - like anticholinesterases and parasympathomimetics may be prescribed in order to stimulate peristalsis [38]. Neostigmine, a synthetic anticholinesterase alkaloid, stimulates intestinal peristalsis with less extensive side effects on the cardiovascular and respiratory systems [39]. Local-acting intestinal peristaltic stimulants, such as castor oil may be administered orally or introduced through the nasogastric tube (NGT). Prolonged paresis requires the placement of an NG-tube for decompression of the digestive tract, prevention of vomiting and airway aspiration or Mendelson's syndrome. We do not usually use nasogastric decompression tube, but only in emergency surgery and just in cases associated with high fluid and gas

**42**

whenever applicable.

distension or in cases with expected prolonged ileus [40].

Various methods of reducing postoperative ileus have been studied. It seems that something as simple as abdominal massage after colonic surgery can reduce the postoperative pain and help resume intestinal transit [41]. Similarly, numerous studies including a metanalysis advocate for the use of chewing gum in order to reduce the ileus period [42] but the results have been contradicted by other studies [43]. Chewing gum is adopted by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as a measure that could reduce ileus [37]; we recommend its selective use

Commonly used opioids such as morphine and fentanyl can prolong the postoperative ileus, by acting like agonists on mu receptors; it is recommended to reduce their use at least in the postoperative settings. In contrast, some kappa agonists like fedotozine U-50, 488H, bremazocine or asimadoline appear to reduce ileus in animal models studies but have never entered clinical practice [44, 45].

For the lower digestive tract surgery, the placement of a transanal gas tube may be used, in order to evacuate the increased pressures that may develop at this level [46]. The procedure is safe and very effective especially in low rectal anastomosis [47]. The transanal tube (TAT), usually 28–30 CH (Charrierre), is placed at the end of the procedure foiled in greased gauze and is primarily used for intraoperative leakage test. The tube is usually left in place for 48 hours or more, accordingly to the patient evolution. The TAT seems to reduce anastomotic leakage (AL), the need for re-interventions for AL, and it is proposed by some authors for the reduction of defunctioning stoma [48]. After interventions that do not involve the colon, an evacuation enema may be performed at 2–3 days postoperatively; this reduces stasis and microbial load at this level, and stimulate the resumption of normal peristalsis.

Close patient surveillance with abdominal palpation is required in order to take and adapt the appropriate postoperative measures. Palpation aims to detect possible areas of deep tenderness and infiltration in the abdomen, painful areas in which any discrete signs of peritoneal irritation draw attention to the occurrence of a complication. The jerky palpation may show flapping, a sign with great specificity for postoperative occlusive syndrome, especially when the patient has initially resumed intestinal transit. Percussion highlights diffuse tympanism during intestinal paresis, while persistent localized hypersonority in an area after hesitant resumption of intestinal transit may draw attention to a complication that may have developed at this level. Auscultating the abdomen can reveal a silent abdomen during the paretic period or vice versa- vivid noises, accompanied by whistling and crackling, an expression of the "struggle" of a loop to overcome a distal obstacle/ obstruction. Anastomotic leakage is the most feared complication because it comes with significant morbidity and mortality in short but also in long term [49]. The earlier the recognition of an anastomotic leakage the better and prompter measures can be taken in order to limit or avoid major morbidity [50]. Postoperative peritonitis following an anastomotic leakage usually develops quietly and may remain undetected since the patient is on pain-killers and the peritoneal surface is less reactive after surgical aggression. CT scan can be falsely negative for anastomotic leakage in fairly large number of cases, therefore, in such cases, it is advisable to take action on first clinical signs of peritonism [51]. Measures may include various combinations of relaparotomy, percutaneous drainage, postoperative wound opening, antibiotics and complete parenteral nutrition. Earlier detection of the underlying pathology result in prompt intervention and therefore better outcomes [52]. In cases of diffuse peritonitis, relaparotomy is mandatory to remove the peritoneal contamination and try to gain control of its source. There is no ideal solution for controlling anastomotic leakage. In some cases, re-resection and anastomotic reconstruction can be an option depending on the local and general conditions. In some cases, the anastomosis may be suppressed, followed by closure of the distal end, while the proximal partner is exteriorized in a stoma. This seems to be the safest approach but it is not always feasible. In other cases, perianastomotic drainage might be enough [53], but usually a proximal diverting stoma is advisable in addition to local drainage. The decision is highly dependent on the surgeon's experience who should always thoroughly evaluate the local and general condition of the patient; it also depends on ICU level, and the local feasibility of endoscopic stenting, interventional radiology, and other interventions.

Some cases may be managed conservatively with the main purpose being to transform the leak into an isolated enterocutaneous fistula [53]. Adequate drainage of the leak results in reduction of the general and local signs of sepsis and inflammation with resuming of intestinal transit, tolerance to dietary intake and improvement of the general condition of the patient. The use of a low-pressure drainage system [54] can help organize the fistular tract, avoiding extensive contamination or digestion (by the activated intestinal enzymes) of neighboring tissues. For the success of this method, we need to ensure that the lumen of the tube remains patent and the surrounding tissues are not being sucked into the holes of the draining tube. The normal evolution of the fistula is with progressive reduction of the flow (which must be noted every 24 hours). In 5–7 days after fistular organization (clinically documented and by contrast enhanced imaging) and the reduction of the flow, we can progressively mobilize the drain by 2 cm every 2–3 days. This allows the tissues to collapse and close the fistula. Sudden reduction of a fistula flow or the early and fast suppression (in a single gesture, not progressively mobilized) of a tube that drains the leak, can result in local abscess formation or even peritonitis. Usually, the fistula closes in 2–3 weeks for the colon and 1–3 month for the small bowel but the time is variable depending on the various factors like type of surgery, age, general performance status, nutrition, level of anastomosis and partners of anastomosis quality [55], but most importantly dependent on the functional status of the bowel. If there are no anatomic (adherences or strictures for instance) or functional obstacles (residual abscess, Crohn disease, etc.) distally, the fistula closure will be faster. Insufficient drainage of the fistula or abdominal sepsis will result in persistence of local inflammation with secondary impairment of the peristaltic movements, creating a vicious circle that will delay fistula closure.

#### **7. Postoperative wound surveillance**

The postoperative wound should be closely monitored on daily basis. In the immediate postoperative period, a sterile dressing covers the wound so we may not be able to directly inspect the sutures. In the first postoperative hours soaking of the dressing [56] with blood is the main sign to look for. The presence of the blood prompts the physician to look for a source of bleeding at the superficial or deeper level and perform adequate hemostasis. In most cases, it is a low-flow bleeding from a dermal vessel that can be controlled by as simple as a local pressure dressing, placing a mesh with hydrogen peroxide, fibrin glue, or a supplementary stitch under local analgesia. This may also have psychological consequences on the patient since the psychological impact of the presence of blood in sight of the patient may induce a state of anxiety and agitation. For deeper bleedings that tend to form hematomas between the wound layers or margins, the evacuation of cloths is mandatory otherwise impairing wound healing. We should not forget that digestive surgery is a contaminated one, because of the breach of gut mucosa, and that blood is the ideal culture medium for bacteria. Therefore, leaving a dead space filled with a hematoma between the margins of the postoperative wound is equivalent with initiating a germ culture. Left in place, in the following days, the cloth will become a more or less profound abscess. At this moment, even if we drain it, the damage has happened already, and short-term morbidity as well as long-term (such as incisional hernia) increase. In order to avoid those unfavorable outcomes, the most appropriate action seems to be the immediate opening of the postoperative wound, (more or less extensive, but usually 2–4 stitches in the area of the bleeding), evacuating the hematoma under sterile conditions, lavage of the wound with antiseptic solutions, targeted hemostasis and primary closure. If there is doubt on definitive hemostasis

**45**

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*

then targeted when culture results become available [10, 56].

Drainage is one of the fundamental means of treatment and prophylaxis in general surgery. Intraoperatively, drainage can be established in various areas of the peritoneal or pleural cavity (in the case of interventions involving the opening of the pleura), at the level of segments of the digestive tract (stomach, intestine, bile ducts) or in remaining cavities following the evacuation of pathological processes (abscesses, hydatid cysts, on the soft parts after evacuation of abscesses, hematomas, tumors, etc.).

They are usually placed after medium or major and contaminated abdominal surgical interventions that open the peritoneum. That said, there is no consensus in the literature around the need for drain(s) placement after abdominal surgeries [59–61]. It is advisable to use drains only when and where they are justified. Drains

are then removed in due time after they have served their purposes [62].

**8. Postoperative drainage monitoring**

**8.1 Drainages of the peritoneal cavity**

or sterility conditions the wound can be left open, covered with sterile dressing until granulation is obtained and secondary superficial suture can be accomplished. Sometimes under the blood-soaked dressing, we may find a diffuse bleeding, accompanied by an ecchymotic aspect of the wound edges aspects that usually indicates poor coagulation. In this context, we must not forget that the superficial operative wound is a mirror of what is happening in depth, in the operative site, and the general measures for restoring the coagulation balance must be prompt and vigorous. Of course, an ecchymosis of the postoperative wound may seem a benign and maybe minor to negligible complication requiring no action or simply a bag of ice, but if the same happens at the level of the anastomosis deep in the abdomen, anastomotic leakage becomes plausible. In this context, we immediately adjust the anticoagulation treatment, postponing or even skipping a dose until we further investigate coagulation status of the patient. As long as the anticoagulation therapy is suspended, it is advisable to use alternative methods to prevent DVT in lower limbs such as intermittent compressive therapy [57, 58] or at least compressive stockings. In the following days, the normal surgical wound is usually uncovered, "in plain sight" or "exposed to the air". There is no reason for covering with sterile dressing since the wound is already sealed by the fibrin that is organized between the two edges. Usually, this normal wound sealing process takes 24–48 hr. in clean or cleancontaminated wounds. Even if there is no strong evidence or consensus [54, 56] on how long we should keep a sterile dressing, our current practice is to avoid dressing after 48 hr. The zonal erythema of the wound accompanied by a localized swelling, possibly centered on a slightly ecchymotic area, suggests the development of the suppurative complication. In this context, the wound must be explored with a stylus or a fine forceps inserted relatively easily in the respective area. The evacuation of a seroma or hematoma that has already turned purulent will prompt the removal of several stitches, with wide opening of the wound, followed by mechanical and antiseptic debridement [56]. Insufficient opening of the wound without adequate drainage will perpetuate the infection and allow the infection to spread to new spaces in the vicinity of the wound. In such instances a superficial infection can become profound and healing may be delayed and deficient, with wound granulomas, postoperative incisional hernias or even eviscerations. Of course, in extensive surgical site infections, local measures must be accompanied by systemic antibiotic therapy, initially with large spectrum according to the most plausible germs and

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

#### *Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

Some cases may be managed conservatively with the main purpose being to transform the leak into an isolated enterocutaneous fistula [53]. Adequate drainage of the leak results in reduction of the general and local signs of sepsis and inflammation with resuming of intestinal transit, tolerance to dietary intake and improvement of the general condition of the patient. The use of a low-pressure drainage system [54] can help organize the fistular tract, avoiding extensive contamination or digestion (by the activated intestinal enzymes) of neighboring tissues. For the success of this method, we need to ensure that the lumen of the tube remains patent and the surrounding tissues are not being sucked into the holes of the draining tube. The normal evolution of the fistula is with progressive reduction of the flow (which must be noted every 24 hours). In 5–7 days after fistular organization (clinically documented and by contrast enhanced imaging) and the reduction of the flow, we can progressively mobilize the drain by 2 cm every 2–3 days. This allows the tissues to collapse and close the fistula. Sudden reduction of a fistula flow or the early and fast suppression (in a single gesture, not progressively mobilized) of a tube that drains the leak, can result in local abscess formation or even peritonitis. Usually, the fistula closes in 2–3 weeks for the colon and 1–3 month for the small bowel but the time is variable depending on the various factors like type of surgery, age, general performance status, nutrition, level of anastomosis and partners of anastomosis quality [55], but most importantly dependent on the functional status of the bowel. If there are no anatomic (adherences or strictures for instance) or functional obstacles (residual abscess, Crohn disease, etc.) distally, the fistula closure will be faster. Insufficient drainage of the fistula or abdominal sepsis will result in persistence of local inflammation with secondary impairment of the peristaltic move-

ments, creating a vicious circle that will delay fistula closure.

The postoperative wound should be closely monitored on daily basis. In the immediate postoperative period, a sterile dressing covers the wound so we may not be able to directly inspect the sutures. In the first postoperative hours soaking of the dressing [56] with blood is the main sign to look for. The presence of the blood prompts the physician to look for a source of bleeding at the superficial or deeper level and perform adequate hemostasis. In most cases, it is a low-flow bleeding from a dermal vessel that can be controlled by as simple as a local pressure dressing, placing a mesh with hydrogen peroxide, fibrin glue, or a supplementary stitch under local analgesia. This may also have psychological consequences on the patient since the psychological impact of the presence of blood in sight of the patient may induce a state of anxiety and agitation. For deeper bleedings that tend to form hematomas between the wound layers or margins, the evacuation of cloths is mandatory otherwise impairing wound healing. We should not forget that digestive surgery is a contaminated one, because of the breach of gut mucosa, and that blood is the ideal culture medium for bacteria. Therefore, leaving a dead space filled with a hematoma between the margins of the postoperative wound is equivalent with initiating a germ culture. Left in place, in the following days, the cloth will become a more or less profound abscess. At this moment, even if we drain it, the damage has happened already, and short-term morbidity as well as long-term (such as incisional hernia) increase. In order to avoid those unfavorable outcomes, the most appropriate action seems to be the immediate opening of the postoperative wound, (more or less extensive, but usually 2–4 stitches in the area of the bleeding), evacuating the hematoma under sterile conditions, lavage of the wound with antiseptic solutions, targeted hemostasis and primary closure. If there is doubt on definitive hemostasis

**7. Postoperative wound surveillance**

**44**

or sterility conditions the wound can be left open, covered with sterile dressing until granulation is obtained and secondary superficial suture can be accomplished.

Sometimes under the blood-soaked dressing, we may find a diffuse bleeding, accompanied by an ecchymotic aspect of the wound edges aspects that usually indicates poor coagulation. In this context, we must not forget that the superficial operative wound is a mirror of what is happening in depth, in the operative site, and the general measures for restoring the coagulation balance must be prompt and vigorous. Of course, an ecchymosis of the postoperative wound may seem a benign and maybe minor to negligible complication requiring no action or simply a bag of ice, but if the same happens at the level of the anastomosis deep in the abdomen, anastomotic leakage becomes plausible. In this context, we immediately adjust the anticoagulation treatment, postponing or even skipping a dose until we further investigate coagulation status of the patient. As long as the anticoagulation therapy is suspended, it is advisable to use alternative methods to prevent DVT in lower limbs such as intermittent compressive therapy [57, 58] or at least compressive stockings.

In the following days, the normal surgical wound is usually uncovered, "in plain sight" or "exposed to the air". There is no reason for covering with sterile dressing since the wound is already sealed by the fibrin that is organized between the two edges. Usually, this normal wound sealing process takes 24–48 hr. in clean or cleancontaminated wounds. Even if there is no strong evidence or consensus [54, 56] on how long we should keep a sterile dressing, our current practice is to avoid dressing after 48 hr. The zonal erythema of the wound accompanied by a localized swelling, possibly centered on a slightly ecchymotic area, suggests the development of the suppurative complication. In this context, the wound must be explored with a stylus or a fine forceps inserted relatively easily in the respective area. The evacuation of a seroma or hematoma that has already turned purulent will prompt the removal of several stitches, with wide opening of the wound, followed by mechanical and antiseptic debridement [56]. Insufficient opening of the wound without adequate drainage will perpetuate the infection and allow the infection to spread to new spaces in the vicinity of the wound. In such instances a superficial infection can become profound and healing may be delayed and deficient, with wound granulomas, postoperative incisional hernias or even eviscerations. Of course, in extensive surgical site infections, local measures must be accompanied by systemic antibiotic therapy, initially with large spectrum according to the most plausible germs and then targeted when culture results become available [10, 56].

#### **8. Postoperative drainage monitoring**

Drainage is one of the fundamental means of treatment and prophylaxis in general surgery. Intraoperatively, drainage can be established in various areas of the peritoneal or pleural cavity (in the case of interventions involving the opening of the pleura), at the level of segments of the digestive tract (stomach, intestine, bile ducts) or in remaining cavities following the evacuation of pathological processes (abscesses, hydatid cysts, on the soft parts after evacuation of abscesses, hematomas, tumors, etc.).

#### **8.1 Drainages of the peritoneal cavity**

They are usually placed after medium or major and contaminated abdominal surgical interventions that open the peritoneum. That said, there is no consensus in the literature around the need for drain(s) placement after abdominal surgeries [59–61]. It is advisable to use drains only when and where they are justified. Drains are then removed in due time after they have served their purposes [62].

In the first hours after surgery, peritoneal drains usually produce small amounts of serosanguinous fluid. Pure blood drainage usually indicates a hemostasis defect that can be minor in small vessels, often secondary to clotting disorders, or major by slipping of ligatures placed on relatively large vessels. Under these conditions, it is extremely important that the drainage be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient, the association with a hemodynamic instability raising the problem of an immediate reintervention to complete the hemostasis. It is advisable to check the condition of the drain tube and especially its permeability frequently, as it can be clogged with clotted blood [63]. In this case, the tube remains unproductive, "hidden" under a clean dressing on the surface, thus providing a false sense of surgical reassurance. Unclogging of the drain tube leads to the resumption of blood flow. If the hemorrhage is still active, the drainage will be with reddish coagulable blood, drop by drop, and will be a strong indication for relaparotomy or laparoscopy [64]. In some cases, not uncommonly, the source of bleeding can be identified in the parietal trajectory of the drainage tube that intercepted a more or less important blood vessel. Local anesthesia and targeted hemostasis can save the patient from an unnecessary laparotomy. Sometimes the drainage resumes with blackish, incoagulable blood, mixed with small partially lysed cloths. This aspect of drainage, which usually persists for several days, sometimes up to weeks, indicates the progressive evacuation of a clot or a large hematoma. Particular attention must be paid in these situations to dressing maneuvers as they can lead to germ contamination and the transformation of the hematoma into an abscess.

The normal evolution of the drainage in the following days is towards the diminution and progressive clearing up. This is the optimal moment to remove the drain. When the drainage is supposed to "protect" an anastomosis we remove the tube after 5–7 days, once the anastomosis has passed the critical period and the intestinal transit is resumed [60]. The tube does not prevent anastomotic dehiscence but may avoid relaparotomy to control an anastomotic dehiscence. If the drainage is to be maintained for a longer period, it is recommended to mobilize the tubes after several days, with their dislocation from the fibrin deposits that form around, a condition for the drainage to remain effective and to prevent pressure lesions that the tube can determine on certain structures such veins, nerves, ureters, etc.

Persistence of significant drainage, over 500 mL/24 hr. (sometimes 3 L/24 hr), with serous fluid, denotes ascites production, secondary to an advanced malignancy (ovarian, peritoneal or massive hepatic metastases), liver cirrhosis or associated hypoproteinemia. Most often these conditions are suspected based on preoperative work-up and then well-documented by the intraoperative exploration. Few recent studies advise to avoid drainage in cirrhotic patients after abdominal surgery [65, 66]. If drainage is necessary, the same studies recommend discontinuing them as soon as possible. When suppressing the drain tube in these cases, a parietal restraint suture is often required to control the discharge of ascites that will otherwise persist through the parietal path of the tube. However, surgical suture dehiscence is frequent in such patients accounting between 20 and 45% [66], forced by the pressure exerted by the fluid and favored by hypoproteinemia and dysmetabolism. In those patients, we use a controlled-flow drainage tube or an abdominal decompression catheter left intraperitoneally until the wound is well healed and/or ascites production is therapeutically reduced. This management allow a controlled drainage of the ascites, in a closed system avoiding the infectious risk. Otherwise, if the tube is removed too early, intraabdominal pressure of the ascitic fluid will force the wound dehiscence and will leak uncontrollably.

After interventions involving an extended lymph node dissection, the initial drainage with serosanguinous appearance becomes sero-citrine after 2–3 days, but persistent, sometimes at flows between 50 and 300 ml / 24 h, consisting of lymph

**47**

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*

fluid rich in protein. Since there is not a consensus [67] our practice is to keep the tube in position until a significant decrease in the amount drained, otherwise there is a risk of developing lymphatic collections [68] (lymphocele), which can become

Under the conditions of perianastomotic drainage, the resumption of a bloody drainage, cherry colored with low flow, sometimes gray to frank purulent with specific odor, associated or following a febrile episode is most often the sign of the onset of an anastomotic fistula. This moment usually coincides with the recurrence of the intestinal paresis, the alteration of the general condition of the patient, the increase of the digestive aspirate or vomiting. Muscle guarding may be present but the specific contracture of peritonitis is most often missing. Postoperatively, most signs of peritonism are less pronounced [69], especially in the elderly patients. Abdominal examination usually reveals localized but difficult to delineate tenderness, accompanied by a local dull pain which is accentuated on palpation. Frequently associated is the suppuration of the surgical wound that must be monitored and opened as early and as wide as needed, a unique gesture that has the ability to limit the extensive evolution in depth. Over the next few days, digestive content according to the level at which the anastomosis was performed, will be evacuated on the drain tube or directly through the surgical wound. Under the conditions of a favorable evolution, the drainage tube will be the "splint" on which an entero-cutaneous fistula forms, the inflammation then gradually decreases, the patient becomes afebrile, resumes his intestinal transit, tolerates diet, and the abdominal signs gradually subside. The development of signs of generalized peritonitis with the persistence of fever and the progressive alteration of the general condition means an insufficient drainage of the anastomotic dehiscence defining a grade C leakage [70] and forces to reintervention. Prompt diagnosis is the key for better outcomes and in this respect the CT exam seems to offer the best diagnostic chances [69]. Either conservative or interventional management is applied, in such conditions addition of antibiotherapy in curative course and a non-steroidal anti-

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97739*

inflammatory drug is always necessary.

**8.2 The drainages of some segments of the digestive tract**

stasis, intense paresis or expected impaired temporary deglutition.

The normal evolution of the aspirate is towards "clarification" and progressive decrease in the context of the resumption of the intestinal transit and the reduction of the abdominal distension, aspects that mark the optimal moment of NGT

The drainages of some segments of the digestive tract are generally established

intraoperatively and aim at achieving temporary decompression of the organs they drain (stomach, common bile duct, etc.) As mentioned, their main role is to evacuate the secretions accumulated in the conditions of postoperative paresis and fight against intraluminal hyper pressures. The most common form is represented by the upper digestive aspiration through a nasogastric tube (NGT), in which the probe inserted trans-nasally and is conducted intraoperatively at the level of the drained segment - esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine. In general, the probe is placed in the conditions of performing anastomoses or sutures at the level of these segments having as main role the protection of the suture. (*anastomotic dehiscence prophylaxis role*). The quality and quantity of the digestive aspirate must be systematically monitored and interpreted in the context of the general and local examination of the abdomen (*diagnostic tool role*). Occasionally the tube can be used to administer medications, to perform lavage or even enteral nutrition (*therapeutic role*) [71]. Congruently with literature reviews we do not systematically use the nasogastric tube [72] but only in cases with

secondarily infected.

*Abdominal Surgery - A Brief Overview*

transformation of the hematoma into an abscess.

In the first hours after surgery, peritoneal drains usually produce small amounts of serosanguinous fluid. Pure blood drainage usually indicates a hemostasis defect that can be minor in small vessels, often secondary to clotting disorders, or major by slipping of ligatures placed on relatively large vessels. Under these conditions, it is extremely important that the drainage be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient, the association with a hemodynamic instability raising the problem of an immediate reintervention to complete the hemostasis. It is advisable to check the condition of the drain tube and especially its permeability frequently, as it can be clogged with clotted blood [63]. In this case, the tube remains unproductive, "hidden" under a clean dressing on the surface, thus providing a false sense of surgical reassurance. Unclogging of the drain tube leads to the resumption of blood flow. If the hemorrhage is still active, the drainage will be with reddish coagulable blood, drop by drop, and will be a strong indication for relaparotomy or laparoscopy [64]. In some cases, not uncommonly, the source of bleeding can be identified in the parietal trajectory of the drainage tube that intercepted a more or less important blood vessel. Local anesthesia and targeted hemostasis can save the patient from an unnecessary laparotomy. Sometimes the drainage resumes with blackish, incoagulable blood, mixed with small partially lysed cloths. This aspect of drainage, which usually persists for several days, sometimes up to weeks, indicates the progressive evacuation of a clot or a large hematoma. Particular attention must be paid in these situations to dressing maneuvers as they can lead to germ contamination and the

The normal evolution of the drainage in the following days is towards the diminution and progressive clearing up. This is the optimal moment to remove the drain. When the drainage is supposed to "protect" an anastomosis we remove the tube after 5–7 days, once the anastomosis has passed the critical period and the intestinal transit is resumed [60]. The tube does not prevent anastomotic dehiscence but may avoid relaparotomy to control an anastomotic dehiscence. If the drainage is to be maintained for a longer period, it is recommended to mobilize the tubes after several days, with their dislocation from the fibrin deposits that form around, a condition for the drainage to remain effective and to prevent pressure lesions that the tube can determine on certain structures such veins, nerves, ureters, etc.

Persistence of significant drainage, over 500 mL/24 hr. (sometimes 3 L/24 hr), with serous fluid, denotes ascites production, secondary to an advanced malignancy (ovarian, peritoneal or massive hepatic metastases), liver cirrhosis or associated hypoproteinemia. Most often these conditions are suspected based on preoperative work-up and then well-documented by the intraoperative exploration. Few recent studies advise to avoid drainage in cirrhotic patients after abdominal surgery [65, 66]. If drainage is necessary, the same studies recommend discontinuing them as soon as possible. When suppressing the drain tube in these cases, a parietal restraint suture is often required to control the discharge of ascites that will otherwise persist through the parietal path of the tube. However, surgical suture dehiscence is frequent in such patients accounting between 20 and 45% [66], forced by the pressure exerted by the fluid and favored by hypoproteinemia and dysmetabolism. In those patients, we use a controlled-flow drainage tube or an abdominal decompression catheter left intraperitoneally until the wound is well healed and/or ascites production is therapeutically reduced. This management allow a controlled drainage of the ascites, in a closed system avoiding the infectious risk. Otherwise, if the tube is removed too early, intraabdominal pressure of the ascitic fluid will force the wound dehiscence and will

After interventions involving an extended lymph node dissection, the initial drainage with serosanguinous appearance becomes sero-citrine after 2–3 days, but persistent, sometimes at flows between 50 and 300 ml / 24 h, consisting of lymph

**46**

leak uncontrollably.

fluid rich in protein. Since there is not a consensus [67] our practice is to keep the tube in position until a significant decrease in the amount drained, otherwise there is a risk of developing lymphatic collections [68] (lymphocele), which can become secondarily infected.

Under the conditions of perianastomotic drainage, the resumption of a bloody drainage, cherry colored with low flow, sometimes gray to frank purulent with specific odor, associated or following a febrile episode is most often the sign of the onset of an anastomotic fistula. This moment usually coincides with the recurrence of the intestinal paresis, the alteration of the general condition of the patient, the increase of the digestive aspirate or vomiting. Muscle guarding may be present but the specific contracture of peritonitis is most often missing. Postoperatively, most signs of peritonism are less pronounced [69], especially in the elderly patients. Abdominal examination usually reveals localized but difficult to delineate tenderness, accompanied by a local dull pain which is accentuated on palpation. Frequently associated is the suppuration of the surgical wound that must be monitored and opened as early and as wide as needed, a unique gesture that has the ability to limit the extensive evolution in depth. Over the next few days, digestive content according to the level at which the anastomosis was performed, will be evacuated on the drain tube or directly through the surgical wound. Under the conditions of a favorable evolution, the drainage tube will be the "splint" on which an entero-cutaneous fistula forms, the inflammation then gradually decreases, the patient becomes afebrile, resumes his intestinal transit, tolerates diet, and the abdominal signs gradually subside. The development of signs of generalized peritonitis with the persistence of fever and the progressive alteration of the general condition means an insufficient drainage of the anastomotic dehiscence defining a grade C leakage [70] and forces to reintervention. Prompt diagnosis is the key for better outcomes and in this respect the CT exam seems to offer the best diagnostic chances [69]. Either conservative or interventional management is applied, in such conditions addition of antibiotherapy in curative course and a non-steroidal antiinflammatory drug is always necessary.

#### **8.2 The drainages of some segments of the digestive tract**

The drainages of some segments of the digestive tract are generally established intraoperatively and aim at achieving temporary decompression of the organs they drain (stomach, common bile duct, etc.) As mentioned, their main role is to evacuate the secretions accumulated in the conditions of postoperative paresis and fight against intraluminal hyper pressures. The most common form is represented by the upper digestive aspiration through a nasogastric tube (NGT), in which the probe inserted trans-nasally and is conducted intraoperatively at the level of the drained segment - esophagus, stomach, duodenum, small intestine. In general, the probe is placed in the conditions of performing anastomoses or sutures at the level of these segments having as main role the protection of the suture. (*anastomotic dehiscence prophylaxis role*). The quality and quantity of the digestive aspirate must be systematically monitored and interpreted in the context of the general and local examination of the abdomen (*diagnostic tool role*). Occasionally the tube can be used to administer medications, to perform lavage or even enteral nutrition (*therapeutic role*) [71]. Congruently with literature reviews we do not systematically use the nasogastric tube [72] but only in cases with stasis, intense paresis or expected impaired temporary deglutition.

The normal evolution of the aspirate is towards "clarification" and progressive decrease in the context of the resumption of the intestinal transit and the reduction of the abdominal distension, aspects that mark the optimal moment of NGT

suppression. The sudden decrease of the aspirate with the persistence or the accentuation of the distension denotes the clogging of the tube and the need to re-permeabilize it. It should not be forgotten that a significant amount of electrolytes is lost in the aspirated fluid, a loss that must be compensated by intravenous perfusion, correlated with the serum ionogram and the quality and quantity of the aspirate. Fluid loss through nasogastric tube must also be compensated by parenteral intake.

In some cases, the drainage of specific segments can be realized by tubes that are trans-parietally externalized, such as duodenostomies or jejunostomies. In the first 2–3 days postoperatively the main role of the tube is to decompress the bowel segments that they drain. The "prototype" for this use is lateral duodenostomy after total gastrectomy with "Roux en-Y" esojejunal anastomosis, in which the duodenum is partially excluded from digestive transit. After normal peristalsis resumption announced by the decreasing of the fluid output per tube over 24 hr., the drainage tube placed laterally in the duodenum can be used as a temporary feeding path [73] until the esojejunal anastomosis can support oral feeding. Although considered a "forgotten" method [73–75], the use of lateral duodenostomy gave us satisfaction (yet unpublished data), being the path that we use in order to achieve early enteral feeding, one of the main goals of ERAS protocol, especially in doubtful anastomosis or documented leakage.

External biliary drainage aims at decompressing the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts after CBD exploration in the presence of a distal obstruction, or to obtain a controlled biliary fistula after major hydatid cyst resections or major hepatectomies [76]. The most common use is the "Kehr" drain with a "T" tube placed in the common bile duct (CBD) which will be suppressed in a controlled manner after resolving the distal obstruction or the proximal leakage. The indications for T tube decreased in the era of endoscopic retrograde colangio-pancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic drainage and stenting, etc. However, there are specific situations when the T tube remains a very good option. Usually the T tube is "guarded" by a subhepatic intraperitoneal drainage that in the first days after surgery will take over small amounts of bile that may leak around the T tube. In the following days the quantity and quality of bile drained by the T tube will be attentively monitored. Normal drainage should be clear bile with a flow of 3-400 ml/24 h and progressively decreasing. The persistence of a high flow clear yellow bile that sometimes can reach 1.5 l/day is a clear indication that the liver functions normally but the common bile duct is still obstructed. In those situations, the T tube becomes also a diagnostic tool, since it allows a rapid cholangiography that in most cases will clarify the diagnostic. Bile drainage containing floaters and deposits that persists for a few days raises the suspicions for intrahepatic acute cholangitis. In those cases, the T tube offers the possibility to collect seriated bile samples for bacteriology exam, culture and antibiogram, allowing thus a specific targeted antibiotherapy. In case that the drainage flow is low with a translucid uncolored fluid hepatic insufficiency should be suspected. Without becoming exhaustive in approaching an extremely complex subject, it should be mentioned that in conditions of abundant biliary drainage that persists for long periods, the imbalances induced in the body become major both by the complex loss of electrolytes, salts and bile acids but also by insufficient nutrient absorption from the digestive tract, generated by insufficient digestion. In such conditions, the reintroduction of the drained bile into the digestive tract by oral administration, via the naso-gastric tube or jejunostomy, should be considered especially in critical ill patients that do not support an internal diversion of the bile flow.

#### **8.3 The drainage of residual cavities**

The drainage of residual cavities after the evacuation of some pathological processes is generally a drainage with a long maintenance period (sometimes

**49**

*Postoperative Follow-Up and Recovery after Abdominal Surgery*