The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS in *N. botia* like those of *G. lamta, P. sophore* and *C. carpio* are covered by a mosaic of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 6 c). The surface architecture of the epithelial cells is characterised by the presence of a series of micro-ridges separated by prominent irregular spaces. The micro-ridges in general appear sinuous having roughed surface, short with abrupt ends and irregularly interwoven to form web like patterns (Fig. 7 a, b). The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by a well-defined double row of micro-ridges, which are often connected by transverse strands to give a braided appearance (Fig. 7 a, b).

## **5.1.2 Mucous cells**

154 Scanning Electron Microscopy

In *Noemacheilus botia* the mouth is small, inferior or sub-terminal, transverse and semicircular (Fig. 5 a). The upper jaw is highly protrusive (Fig. 5 b, c) and the lower jaw is only slightly protrusive. The HUJS and HLJS in this fish are prominent and are characteristically modified.

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS are mucogenic. The epithelia of the UL and the LL are thrown in to distinctive protuberances of variable dimensions delineated by narrow furrows (Fig. 6 a, b). Further, the epithelia of the FSUR and the FSLS

> Fig. 5. Fig. 6.

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS in *N. botia* like those of *G. lamta, P. sophore* and *C. carpio* are covered by a mosaic of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 6 c). The surface architecture of the epithelial cells is

Further, the UL and the LL in this fish are thick and plicate (Fig. 5 a, b, c).

**5.** *Noemacheilus botia*

**5.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

**5.1.1 Epithelial cells**

are characteristically pleated (Fig. 6 a, b, c).

Mucous cell openings, seen as wide, rounded apertures or crypts, often containing blobs of mucus, are interspersed between the epithelial cells. Generally, such apertures occur where the boundaries of 3 or more epithelial cells meet (Fig. 7 a, b).

## **5.1.3 Taste buds**

The most conspicuous surface feature of the epithelia of the UL and the LL in *N. botia* is the presence of distinct protuberances each studded with a large number of small, protrusions or elevations (Fig. 6 a, b; Fig. 8 a, b, c). These elevation appear conical and extend beyond the general epithelial surface (Fig. 8 a). The slopes of each elevation or papilla are covered by a mosaic pavement of concentrically arranged epithelial cells. The epithelial cells covering the surface of these papillae and at their vicinity, in general, are arranged concentrically (Fig. 8 b, c). The apex of each elevation is characterised by the presence of numerous closely packed microvilli (Fig. 8 b, c). These microvilli represent the taste hairs originating from taste cells of the buds and are projected through the rounded taste pore at the summit of these elevations.

Fig. 7. Fig. 8. Fig. 9.

## **5.2 Keratinized epithelia**

The epithelia of the HUJS and the HLJS are keratinized and resemble with each other in their surface architecture. The surface epithelial cells of the HUJS and the HLJS, in general,

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 157

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS in *C. fasciata* like those of *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* are covered by a mosaic of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 12 a). The surface architecture of the epithelial cells is characterised by the presence of a series of micro-ridges. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by smooth well-defined uninterrupted double row of closely

The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL and the LL are generally short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of small groups (Fig. 12 c; Fig. 13 b). Several such groups of micro-ridges may be observed on the surface of each cell. Adjacent groups of micro-ridges are delineated from each other by extensive micro-ridges, which are often branched and encircle each group. The micro-ridges within a group are generally arranged parallel to each other either linearly or concentrically. The adjacent micro-ridges are interconnected with each other by fine transverse connections,

The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelium of the RC, in contrast, appear smooth, extensive, uninterrupted, at times branched and are separated by wide furrows. In general these are arranged systematically in a concentric manner, traversing almost parallel to the boundary of the cell forming intricate patterns. In the narrow central region of these cells, the micro-ridges are often either indistinct or fragmented (Fig. 12 a, b). The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the FSUR and the FSLS are relatively few, extensive and are located parallel to

Fig 10. Fig. 11. Fig. 12.

each other at long intervals (Fig. 13 a). Further micro-bridges could not be located.

**6.1 Mucogenic epithelia 6.1.1 Epithelial cells**

the micro-bridges (Fig. 12 b).

approximated micro-ridges (Fig. 12 a, b, c).

towards the proximal regions gradually get transformed in to truncated specialised structures - the unculi. Thus the surface architecture of the horny jaw sheaths at their distal regions i.e. the regions boarding the mouth is strikingly distinct from those at the proximal regions i.e. towards the buccal cavity (Fig. 9 a).

The surface of the epithelia at the distal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS are covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 9 b). The free surface of these cells is characterised by the presence of compactly arranged microridges separated by narrow irregular spaces. The micro-ridges, in general, are short, sinuous, beaded, branched with abrupt ends and are irregularly interwoven to form maze like pattern (Fig. 9 c). The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are very prominent and appear slightly raised from the general surface of the epithelia (Fig. 9 c). These are demarcated by well-defined double rows of micro-ridges, which appear either lying very close to each other or fused. The central regions of these epithelial cells, in general, show rounded bulge at the surface. Each bulge is further demarcated by a narrow depression around them in the form of a ring (Fig. 9 b, c). These bulges could represent the nuclei of these epithelial cells, which appear greatly flattened in cross sections.

The surface of the epithelia at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS are studded with characteristic truncated, polygonal unculi (Fig. 9 d). The unculi, in general, appear uniform in dimensions and remain projected at the free surface. Each unculus represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell*.* The unculi appear irregularly arranged and the central part of each unculus is wide and often irregularly distributed projections. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells bearing the unculi are distinctly demarcated.

## **6.** *Colisa fasciata*

In *C. fasciata* the mouth is oblique or slightly upturned (Fig. 10 a). The upper jaw is highly protrusive and extends forward to a great extent (Fig. 10 b, c). The lower jaw, however, is only slightly protrusive. Further, the UL and the LL, in general, are thin. The UL is, however, relatively less conspicuous than the LL. The lips are relatively thick and appear lobular at the lateral sides of the mouth. The lobes are separated by shallow grooves. The HUJS and the HLJS are very conspicuous and their distal regions are modified into prominent sharp cutting edges. At intervals papilliform teeth like structures are observed protruding on the surface of the jaw sheaths (Fig. 10 d).

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS are mucogenic. In contrast, the epithelia of the HUJS and HLJS are keratinized and the dead keratinized epithelial cells at the surface are commonly visualised to be lifted up from the underlying tissues. They are probably in the process of being exfoliated. Further, the jaw sheaths are characterised by the presence of papilliform teeth like structures, which protrude at intervals from their surfaces facing the mouth opening (Fig. 11 a, b, c). The surface of the UL epithelium shows slight infoldings, which are visible even in stretched conditions. The folds on the surface of the LL, in contrast, are more distinct and are distinguished in to prominent ridges separated by shallow gutter-like depressions. Generally, these ridges run parallel to each other along the surface bordering the mouth. (Fig. 11 a, c).

#### **6.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

#### **6.1.1 Epithelial cells**

156 Scanning Electron Microscopy

towards the proximal regions gradually get transformed in to truncated specialised structures - the unculi. Thus the surface architecture of the horny jaw sheaths at their distal regions i.e. the regions boarding the mouth is strikingly distinct from those at the proximal

The surface of the epithelia at the distal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS are covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 9 b). The free surface of these cells is characterised by the presence of compactly arranged microridges separated by narrow irregular spaces. The micro-ridges, in general, are short, sinuous, beaded, branched with abrupt ends and are irregularly interwoven to form maze like pattern (Fig. 9 c). The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are very prominent and appear slightly raised from the general surface of the epithelia (Fig. 9 c). These are demarcated by well-defined double rows of micro-ridges, which appear either lying very close to each other or fused. The central regions of these epithelial cells, in general, show rounded bulge at the surface. Each bulge is further demarcated by a narrow depression around them in the form of a ring (Fig. 9 b, c). These bulges could represent the nuclei of

The surface of the epithelia at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS are studded with characteristic truncated, polygonal unculi (Fig. 9 d). The unculi, in general, appear uniform in dimensions and remain projected at the free surface. Each unculus represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell*.* The unculi appear irregularly arranged and the central part of each unculus is wide and often irregularly distributed projections. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells bearing the

In *C. fasciata* the mouth is oblique or slightly upturned (Fig. 10 a). The upper jaw is highly protrusive and extends forward to a great extent (Fig. 10 b, c). The lower jaw, however, is only slightly protrusive. Further, the UL and the LL, in general, are thin. The UL is, however, relatively less conspicuous than the LL. The lips are relatively thick and appear lobular at the lateral sides of the mouth. The lobes are separated by shallow grooves. The HUJS and the HLJS are very conspicuous and their distal regions are modified into prominent sharp cutting edges. At intervals papilliform teeth like structures are observed

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS are mucogenic. In contrast, the epithelia of the HUJS and HLJS are keratinized and the dead keratinized epithelial cells at the surface are commonly visualised to be lifted up from the underlying tissues. They are probably in the process of being exfoliated. Further, the jaw sheaths are characterised by the presence of papilliform teeth like structures, which protrude at intervals from their surfaces facing the mouth opening (Fig. 11 a, b, c). The surface of the UL epithelium shows slight infoldings, which are visible even in stretched conditions. The folds on the surface of the LL, in contrast, are more distinct and are distinguished in to prominent ridges separated by shallow gutter-like depressions. Generally, these ridges run parallel to each other along the

these epithelial cells, which appear greatly flattened in cross sections.

regions i.e. towards the buccal cavity (Fig. 9 a).

unculi are distinctly demarcated.

protruding on the surface of the jaw sheaths (Fig. 10 d).

surface bordering the mouth. (Fig. 11 a, c).

**6.** *Colisa fasciata*

The epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS in *C. fasciata* like those of *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* are covered by a mosaic of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions (Fig. 12 a). The surface architecture of the epithelial cells is characterised by the presence of a series of micro-ridges. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by smooth well-defined uninterrupted double row of closely approximated micro-ridges (Fig. 12 a, b, c).

The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL and the LL are generally short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of small groups (Fig. 12 c; Fig. 13 b). Several such groups of micro-ridges may be observed on the surface of each cell. Adjacent groups of micro-ridges are delineated from each other by extensive micro-ridges, which are often branched and encircle each group. The micro-ridges within a group are generally arranged parallel to each other either linearly or concentrically. The adjacent micro-ridges are interconnected with each other by fine transverse connections, the micro-bridges (Fig. 12 b).

The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelium of the RC, in contrast, appear smooth, extensive, uninterrupted, at times branched and are separated by wide furrows. In general these are arranged systematically in a concentric manner, traversing almost parallel to the boundary of the cell forming intricate patterns. In the narrow central region of these cells, the micro-ridges are often either indistinct or fragmented (Fig. 12 a, b). The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the FSUR and the FSLS are relatively few, extensive and are located parallel to each other at long intervals (Fig. 13 a). Further micro-bridges could not be located.

Fig 10. Fig. 11. Fig. 12.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 159

formed by these at the cell surfaces seems indistinctive. The boundary between the adjacent epithelial cells is delineated either by shallow separating clefts or by a double row of micro-

At the distal regions of the jaw sheaths the micro-ridges at the surface of the epithelial cells are frequently punctated (Fig. 14 c) and are separated by wide spaces. In addition short, sinuous, branched micro-ridges interwoven to form characteristic patterns are also observed (Fig. 15 a). The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by double row

At and near the apical margins of the horny jaw sheaths the epithelial cells generally, exhibited a surface relief of fine closely approximated micro-ridges such being often prominent in the central parts of the cells. The micro-ridges at the narrow peripheral portions of the cells were relatively short being more widely spaced and irregularly located. The boundaries of the epithelial cells were demarcated by prominent continuous marginal

The epithelial cells at the distal regions including the apical margins are frequently observed to be lifted up from the underlying tissues. They were probably in the process of being

In *Garra lamta* mouth is sub-terminal and is situated on the ventral side of the head. In this fish the upper jaw and the lower jaw are only slightly protrusive. The UL and the LL are rudimentary and are represented by slight thickening of the epithelia, at narrow regions, covering the upper jaw and the lower jaw respectively. In the regions bordering the lateral margins of the mouth, however, the lips are distinguished as small, stumpy, papillae like

The RC is very prominent and greatly enlarged. Its epithelium may be distinguished in to a keratinized belt towards the mouth opening and a major mucogenic region towards dorsal head skin. At the apical margins of the RC mucogenic islands are observed between the keratinized regions. These non-keratinized and keratinized regions show characteristic

The epithelium of the AP like that of the RC is distinguished in to mucogenic and keratinized regions. The epithelium of the major central region of the AP is mucogenic. The

The surface of the mucogenic epithelium of the RC is covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions. The free surface of each epithelial cell is characterised by the presence of a series of compactly arranged micro-ridges separated by narrow irregular spaces. The micro- ridges, in general, appear sinuous, having smoothed surface, short with abrupt ends and irregularly interwoven to form maze like

narrow peripheral regions of the AP are, however, keratinized.

elevations of adjacent cells, sometimes with an inconspicuous gap between them.

ridges separated by distinct spaces (Fig. 14 a, b).

of closely approximated micro-ridges.

sloughed (Fig. 14 c; Fig. 15 a, b).

structures (Pinky et al., 2002, 2008).

**7.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

alternate arrangements.

**7.1.1 Epithelial cells**

**7.** *Garra lamta*

## **6.1.2 Mucous cells**

Interspersed between the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS mucous cell apertures of varied dimensions are observed similar to those in *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* (Fig. 12 a, b, c).

## **6.1.3 Taste buds**

Taste buds are located on the ridges at the surface of the UL and the LL. Further, the epithelial surface in the regions where taste buds are located is thrown into papillae like projections protruding beyond the general surface of the epithelia. At the summit of each such papilla several microvilli representing the taste hairs of the taste buds are located. The arrangement of the epithelial cells at and around each papilla bearing a taste bud is concentric and the appearance of the taste buds at the summit of these papillae are similar to those in *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* (Fig. 13 a, b)*.*

## **6.2 Keratinized epithelia**

The HUJS and HLJS are covered with a pavement of epithelia of close packed polygonal cells of irregular shape and size. The epithelial cells, however, show regional variations in their surface architecture.

At the proximal regions of the jaw sheaths, the surface of the epithelial cells appears scrawly. The micro-ridges are small, low, irregular and ill defined. Further, the pattern

formed by these at the cell surfaces seems indistinctive. The boundary between the adjacent epithelial cells is delineated either by shallow separating clefts or by a double row of microridges separated by distinct spaces (Fig. 14 a, b).

At the distal regions of the jaw sheaths the micro-ridges at the surface of the epithelial cells are frequently punctated (Fig. 14 c) and are separated by wide spaces. In addition short, sinuous, branched micro-ridges interwoven to form characteristic patterns are also observed (Fig. 15 a). The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by double row of closely approximated micro-ridges.

At and near the apical margins of the horny jaw sheaths the epithelial cells generally, exhibited a surface relief of fine closely approximated micro-ridges such being often prominent in the central parts of the cells. The micro-ridges at the narrow peripheral portions of the cells were relatively short being more widely spaced and irregularly located. The boundaries of the epithelial cells were demarcated by prominent continuous marginal elevations of adjacent cells, sometimes with an inconspicuous gap between them.

The epithelial cells at the distal regions including the apical margins are frequently observed to be lifted up from the underlying tissues. They were probably in the process of being sloughed (Fig. 14 c; Fig. 15 a, b).

## **7.** *Garra lamta*

158 Scanning Electron Microscopy

Interspersed between the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS mucous cell apertures of varied dimensions are observed similar to those in *G.*

Taste buds are located on the ridges at the surface of the UL and the LL. Further, the epithelial surface in the regions where taste buds are located is thrown into papillae like projections protruding beyond the general surface of the epithelia. At the summit of each such papilla several microvilli representing the taste hairs of the taste buds are located. The arrangement of the epithelial cells at and around each papilla bearing a taste bud is concentric and the appearance of the taste buds at the summit of these papillae are similar to

The HUJS and HLJS are covered with a pavement of epithelia of close packed polygonal cells of irregular shape and size. The epithelial cells, however, show regional variations in

Fig. 13. Fig. 14. Fig.15.

At the proximal regions of the jaw sheaths, the surface of the epithelial cells appears scrawly. The micro-ridges are small, low, irregular and ill defined. Further, the pattern

**6.1.2 Mucous cells**

**6.1.3 Taste buds**

**6.2 Keratinized epithelia**

their surface architecture.

*lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* (Fig. 12 a, b, c).

those in *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* (Fig. 13 a, b)*.*

In *Garra lamta* mouth is sub-terminal and is situated on the ventral side of the head. In this fish the upper jaw and the lower jaw are only slightly protrusive. The UL and the LL are rudimentary and are represented by slight thickening of the epithelia, at narrow regions, covering the upper jaw and the lower jaw respectively. In the regions bordering the lateral margins of the mouth, however, the lips are distinguished as small, stumpy, papillae like structures (Pinky et al., 2002, 2008).

## **7.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

The RC is very prominent and greatly enlarged. Its epithelium may be distinguished in to a keratinized belt towards the mouth opening and a major mucogenic region towards dorsal head skin. At the apical margins of the RC mucogenic islands are observed between the keratinized regions. These non-keratinized and keratinized regions show characteristic alternate arrangements.

The epithelium of the AP like that of the RC is distinguished in to mucogenic and keratinized regions. The epithelium of the major central region of the AP is mucogenic. The narrow peripheral regions of the AP are, however, keratinized.

## **7.1.1 Epithelial cells**

The surface of the mucogenic epithelium of the RC is covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions. The free surface of each epithelial cell is characterised by the presence of a series of compactly arranged micro-ridges separated by narrow irregular spaces. The micro- ridges, in general, appear sinuous, having smoothed surface, short with abrupt ends and irregularly interwoven to form maze like

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 161

The keratinized epithelium at the posterior and lateral margins of the AP is characterized by the presence of rounded projections or excrescencies similar to those in the keratinized epithelium of the RC. In the keratinized epithelium at the anterior margin of the AP, in contrast, these excrescencies appear relatively prominent and tall. In general, these appear inverted cone shaped or basket like, each with a narrow proximal base, which gradually becomes relatively wide at the distal region. Like in the keratinized epithelium of the RC, the distal surfaces of these projections are characterised with the presence of a cluster of unculi, which represent modified surface relief of fine projections of superficial layer epithelial cells. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells are often clearly demarcated

The surface sculpture of the epithelia of the HUJS and the HLJS is similar to each other and are characteristically studded with tall, truncated, polygonal unculi. These unculi, in general, appear uniform in dimensions and shape and remain projected at the free surface. The unculi are arranged diagonally in parallel rows in an organised manner to form a characteristic pattern on the surface of the horny jaw sheaths. Each unculus, like that of the RC and the AP, represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell. In contrast, these projections appear more developed smooth and prominent at the margins of the cells and show a gradual decline in their height towards the central part of the cell. This results in the formation of a characteristic sharp edge at the margin and a deep depression at

the central region of each unculus. Each unculus thus appear very much like a tooth.

The rudimentary UL and the LL, and the delicate FSUR, the FSLA, the FSACAP and the FSAV remain concealed and thus the surface architecture could not be visualized because

In *Puntius sophore* the mouth is terminal (Fig. 16 a, b, c). The upper jaw is highly protrusive. In contrast, the lower jaw is only slightly protrusive. Further, the UL and the LL are prominent. The UL is however, thin and the LL, in contrast, is very thick (special permission

Surface architecture of the mucogenic epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS, in general, resembles with each other. The surface of the epithelia is covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions. The free surface of each epithelial cell is characteristically thrown in to a series of micro-ridges having smooth surface. The micro-ridges, in contrast to those of *G. lamta*, are separated by wide furrows and are extensive, at times branched and traverse almost parallel to the boundary of the cell forming intricate patterns (Fig. 17 a, b). Further, the adjacent microridges are interconnected with each other by fine transverse connections, the micro-bridges.

**7.2.2 Adhesive pad**

by well-defined uninterrupted rows of micro-ridges.

these regions are deeper in position.

for figures 16-19 have been taken from Tissue and Cell).

**8.** *Puntius sophore*

**8.1 Mucogenic epithelia 8.1.1 Epithelial cells**

**7.2.3 Horny upper jaw sheath & Horny lower jaw sheath**

patterns. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by well-defined double row of micro- ridges, which are often interwoven to give a braided appearance.

## **7.1.2 Mucous cells**

Interspersed between the epithelial cells rounded or irregular shaped crypts could be observed. These crypts often contain blobs of mucus and represent mucous cell openings. Generally, these apertures are located at the points where the boundaries of three or more epithelial cells meet.

## **7.1.3 Taste buds**

A large number of epithelial protrusion or elevations that extends beyond the epithelial surface are located at irregular intervals. Each epithelial elevation is characteristically associated with a taste bud. The epithelial cells covering the surface of the elevations and at their vicinity, in general, are arranged concentrically. At the apical surface of each epithelial elevation, closely packed microvilli are observed. These microvilli appear to represent the taste hairs originating from the sensory cells of the taste buds.

The mucogenic islands in between the keratinized regions at the apical margin of the RC are characterised by the presence of several stumpy epithelial protrusions lying close to each other. Each epithelial protrusion is associated with a taste bud.

The surface relief of the epithelial cells in the mucogenic region of the AP, in general, is similar to that of the epithelial cells in the mucogenic epithelium of the RC. Further, the mucogenic epithelium of the AP resembles with that of the RC in the distribution of a large number of taste buds and in the presence of mucous cell openings.

## **7.2 Keratinized epithelia**

## **7.2.1 Rostral cap**

The surface of the epithelium of the RC in the keratinized regions, in contrast, to that in mucogenic regions appears shaggy. In general, it is matted with rounded projections or excrescencies in an organised array that are separated by shallow grooves.

The surface of each excrescence is represented by a cluster of several (15-25 or even more) prominent somewhat curved spine like unculi each having a broad base and a narrow apical end. Each unculus is projected at the free surface and represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell.

These projections show a gradual increase in their height from the peripheral margin to the centre of the cell and in general appear compactly arranged or fused. The apical end of an unculus is either blunt or conical and the surface is rough with vertically oriented microvillous projections. Between the unculi, the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells demarcated by distinct rows of micro-ridges may be observed.

The epithelial cells in shallow grooves between the excrescencies also show modified surface relief of fine projections. These are, however, less prominent and are not differentiated in to unculi like structures.

#### **7.2.2 Adhesive pad**

160 Scanning Electron Microscopy

patterns. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by well-defined double row of micro- ridges, which are often interwoven to give a braided appearance.

Interspersed between the epithelial cells rounded or irregular shaped crypts could be observed. These crypts often contain blobs of mucus and represent mucous cell openings. Generally, these apertures are located at the points where the boundaries of three or more

A large number of epithelial protrusion or elevations that extends beyond the epithelial surface are located at irregular intervals. Each epithelial elevation is characteristically associated with a taste bud. The epithelial cells covering the surface of the elevations and at their vicinity, in general, are arranged concentrically. At the apical surface of each epithelial elevation, closely packed microvilli are observed. These microvilli appear to represent the

The mucogenic islands in between the keratinized regions at the apical margin of the RC are characterised by the presence of several stumpy epithelial protrusions lying close to each

The surface relief of the epithelial cells in the mucogenic region of the AP, in general, is similar to that of the epithelial cells in the mucogenic epithelium of the RC. Further, the mucogenic epithelium of the AP resembles with that of the RC in the distribution of a large

The surface of the epithelium of the RC in the keratinized regions, in contrast, to that in mucogenic regions appears shaggy. In general, it is matted with rounded projections or

The surface of each excrescence is represented by a cluster of several (15-25 or even more) prominent somewhat curved spine like unculi each having a broad base and a narrow apical end. Each unculus is projected at the free surface and represents modified surface relief of

These projections show a gradual increase in their height from the peripheral margin to the centre of the cell and in general appear compactly arranged or fused. The apical end of an unculus is either blunt or conical and the surface is rough with vertically oriented microvillous projections. Between the unculi, the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells

The epithelial cells in shallow grooves between the excrescencies also show modified surface relief of fine projections. These are, however, less prominent and are not

taste hairs originating from the sensory cells of the taste buds.

other. Each epithelial protrusion is associated with a taste bud.

number of taste buds and in the presence of mucous cell openings.

excrescencies in an organised array that are separated by shallow grooves.

fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell.

differentiated in to unculi like structures.

demarcated by distinct rows of micro-ridges may be observed.

**7.1.2 Mucous cells**

epithelial cells meet.

**7.2 Keratinized epithelia**

**7.2.1 Rostral cap**

**7.1.3 Taste buds**

The keratinized epithelium at the posterior and lateral margins of the AP is characterized by the presence of rounded projections or excrescencies similar to those in the keratinized epithelium of the RC. In the keratinized epithelium at the anterior margin of the AP, in contrast, these excrescencies appear relatively prominent and tall. In general, these appear inverted cone shaped or basket like, each with a narrow proximal base, which gradually becomes relatively wide at the distal region. Like in the keratinized epithelium of the RC, the distal surfaces of these projections are characterised with the presence of a cluster of unculi, which represent modified surface relief of fine projections of superficial layer epithelial cells. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells are often clearly demarcated by well-defined uninterrupted rows of micro-ridges.

#### **7.2.3 Horny upper jaw sheath & Horny lower jaw sheath**

The surface sculpture of the epithelia of the HUJS and the HLJS is similar to each other and are characteristically studded with tall, truncated, polygonal unculi. These unculi, in general, appear uniform in dimensions and shape and remain projected at the free surface. The unculi are arranged diagonally in parallel rows in an organised manner to form a characteristic pattern on the surface of the horny jaw sheaths. Each unculus, like that of the RC and the AP, represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell. In contrast, these projections appear more developed smooth and prominent at the margins of the cells and show a gradual decline in their height towards the central part of the cell. This results in the formation of a characteristic sharp edge at the margin and a deep depression at the central region of each unculus. Each unculus thus appear very much like a tooth.

The rudimentary UL and the LL, and the delicate FSUR, the FSLA, the FSACAP and the FSAV remain concealed and thus the surface architecture could not be visualized because these regions are deeper in position.

## **8.** *Puntius sophore*

In *Puntius sophore* the mouth is terminal (Fig. 16 a, b, c). The upper jaw is highly protrusive. In contrast, the lower jaw is only slightly protrusive. Further, the UL and the LL are prominent. The UL is however, thin and the LL, in contrast, is very thick (special permission for figures 16-19 have been taken from Tissue and Cell).

## **8.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

#### **8.1.1 Epithelial cells**

Surface architecture of the mucogenic epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS, in general, resembles with each other. The surface of the epithelia is covered by a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells of varied dimensions. The free surface of each epithelial cell is characteristically thrown in to a series of micro-ridges having smooth surface. The micro-ridges, in contrast to those of *G. lamta*, are separated by wide furrows and are extensive, at times branched and traverse almost parallel to the boundary of the cell forming intricate patterns (Fig. 17 a, b). Further, the adjacent microridges are interconnected with each other by fine transverse connections, the micro-bridges.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 163

in dimensions and remain projected at the free surface (Fig. 18 c; Fig. 19 a). Each unculus represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell and resemble in their shape and organisation to those in the epithelia at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS of *N. botia*. The unculi in this fish appear relatively less orderly arranged. Further, the central part of each unculus is much wide and often shows the

> Fig. 18. Fig. 19.

The unculi show a gradual decrease in their height towards the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS. At these regions the surface relief of each unculus in contrast to those at the distal regions appears scraggy (Fig. 19 b, c). The micro-villous projections at the peripheral region on the surface of each cell appear fused to form the outer boundary of each unculus with scrawly surface (Fig. 19 c). The major central part of each unculus is occupied with micro-villous projections, which often appear fused awkwardly to give a

Between the unculi both at the distal and proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells demarcated by distinct rows of micro-ridges are

In *C. carpio* the mouth is terminal (Fig. 20 a, b). The upper jaw is highly protrusive (Fig. 20 c, d) and the lower jaw is slightly protrusive. The UL and the LL covering the upper jaw and

scrambled or frothy appearance to the surface (Fig. 19 c).

observed (Fig. 19 a, c).

**9.** *Cyprinus carpio*

presence of characteristic irregularly distributed projections (Fig. 19 a, b).

The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by smooth well-defined double row of closely approximated micro-ridges (Fig. 17 a, b). In addition, epithelial cells with compactly arranged sinuous, short micro-ridges with abrupt ends to form maze like pattern or with micro-ridges giving a punctated appearance to the surface are frequent in the epithelia on the apical side of the UL and the LL (Fig. 17 c).

#### **8.1.2 Mucous cells**

Crypts representing the mucous cell openings, often containing blobs of mucus, are frequently observed at the borders of 3 or 4 epithelial cells (Fig. 17 a). The crypts are relatively conspicuous, large, rounded and frequent in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, and the RC, than those of the FSUR and the FSLS.

Fig. 16. Fig. 17.

#### **8.1.3 Taste buds**

In the epithelia of the UL and the LL a large number of taste buds are observed (Fig. 18 a, b). Each taste bud is situated on a small epithelial papilla projecting at the surface. The epithelial cells covering the surface of these papillae and at their vicinity, in general, are arranged concentrically (Fig. 17 c; Fig. 18 a, b). At the summit of each papilla closely packed microvilli are observed (Fig. 17 c). These microvilli appear to represent the taste hairs originating from the sensory cells of the taste buds.

#### **8.2 Keratinized epithelia**

The epithelial surface of the HUJS and the HLJS at their distal regions are studded with characteristic truncated, polygonal unculi (Fig. 18 b). The unculi, in general, appear uniform

The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by smooth well-defined double row of closely approximated micro-ridges (Fig. 17 a, b). In addition, epithelial cells with compactly arranged sinuous, short micro-ridges with abrupt ends to form maze like pattern or with micro-ridges giving a punctated appearance to the surface are frequent in

Crypts representing the mucous cell openings, often containing blobs of mucus, are frequently observed at the borders of 3 or 4 epithelial cells (Fig. 17 a). The crypts are relatively conspicuous, large, rounded and frequent in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, and

Fig. 16. Fig. 17.

In the epithelia of the UL and the LL a large number of taste buds are observed (Fig. 18 a, b). Each taste bud is situated on a small epithelial papilla projecting at the surface. The epithelial cells covering the surface of these papillae and at their vicinity, in general, are arranged concentrically (Fig. 17 c; Fig. 18 a, b). At the summit of each papilla closely packed microvilli are observed (Fig. 17 c). These microvilli appear to represent the taste hairs

The epithelial surface of the HUJS and the HLJS at their distal regions are studded with characteristic truncated, polygonal unculi (Fig. 18 b). The unculi, in general, appear uniform

the epithelia on the apical side of the UL and the LL (Fig. 17 c).

RC FSUR UL LL FSLS

the RC, than those of the FSUR and the FSLS.

**8.1.2 Mucous cells**

UL LL FSL S

FSUR RC

\_\_\_\_

UL

FSUR RC

LL

FSLS

originating from the sensory cells of the taste buds.

**8.1.3 Taste buds**

**8.2 Keratinized epithelia**

Mouth HUJS

HLJS

in dimensions and remain projected at the free surface (Fig. 18 c; Fig. 19 a). Each unculus represents modified surface relief of fine projections of a superficial layer epithelial cell and resemble in their shape and organisation to those in the epithelia at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS of *N. botia*. The unculi in this fish appear relatively less orderly arranged. Further, the central part of each unculus is much wide and often shows the presence of characteristic irregularly distributed projections (Fig. 19 a, b).

Fig. 18. Fig. 19.

The unculi show a gradual decrease in their height towards the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS. At these regions the surface relief of each unculus in contrast to those at the distal regions appears scraggy (Fig. 19 b, c). The micro-villous projections at the peripheral region on the surface of each cell appear fused to form the outer boundary of each unculus with scrawly surface (Fig. 19 c). The major central part of each unculus is occupied with micro-villous projections, which often appear fused awkwardly to give a scrambled or frothy appearance to the surface (Fig. 19 c).

Between the unculi both at the distal and proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells demarcated by distinct rows of micro-ridges are observed (Fig. 19 a, c).

## **9.** *Cyprinus carpio*

In *C. carpio* the mouth is terminal (Fig. 20 a, b). The upper jaw is highly protrusive (Fig. 20 c, d) and the lower jaw is slightly protrusive. The UL and the LL covering the upper jaw and

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 165

In the RC epithelium, small taste buds are located individually at long intervals (Fig. 22 a). In the epithelia of the UL and the LL, however, a large number of taste buds are observed, each located on a small epithelial papilla projecting at the surface (Fig. 22 a, b). The taste buds at the major distal potion of the lips are characteristically located in-groups arranged in parallel rows (Fig. 22 b, c). The arrangement of the epithelial cells at and around each papilla bearing a taste bud and the appearance of the taste buds at the summit of these papillae are

> Fig. 22. Fig. 23.

The epithelial cells at the surface of the HUJS and the HLJS are studded with characteristic polygonal unculi (Fig. 23 a, b, c). The surface relief of each unculus appears truncated. Each unculus is raised significantly from the general surface as a narrow bend at the periphery and has a shallow depression at its major central region (Fig. 23 a, b, c). Further, the surface relief appears scraggy similar to those at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS of *P. sophore*. In contrast, the micro-ridges at the surface of each unculus are prominent, separated by wide spaces and do not fuse with each other. These micro-ridges are interwoven forming web-like patterns (Fig. 23 b, c). The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells, modified as unculi, are demarcated by distinct double rows of micro-ridges (Fig. 23 c).

The space between these micro-ridges is relatively prominent and wide.

**9.1.3 Taste buds**

similar to those in *P. sophore* and *G. lamta*.

**9.2 Keratinized epithelia**

the lower jaw respectively, in contrast, are thick and prominent and are associated with relatively inconspicuous HUJS and the HLJS.

Fig. 20. Fig. 21.

## **9.1 Mucogenic epithelia**

## **9.1.1 Epithelial cells**

The surface of the mucogenic epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS, like those of *P. sophore,* is covered by a mosaic pavement of epithelial cells. The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells of these epithelia are separated by wide furrows and are extensive. In contrast, the micro-ridges in this fish often appear beaded, branched and interlocked to form intricate patterns (Fig. 21 a, b, c). Further, the micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent micro-ridges are more prominent and frequent. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by well-defined double row of closely approximated micro-ridges often interconnected by transverse connections (Fig. 21 b, c).

### **9.1.2 Mucous cells**

Interspersed between the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS are observed wide, rounded crypts or pores of varied dimensions, like in *P. sophore.* Generally these crypts or pores occur where the boundaries of three or four epithelial cells meet. These could represent the openings of the mucous cells. This is further confirmed by the presence of blobs of mucus in most of these crypts (Fig. 21 a, b, c).

#### **9.1.3 Taste buds**

164 Scanning Electron Microscopy

the lower jaw respectively, in contrast, are thick and prominent and are associated with

Fig. 20. Fig. 21.

The surface of the mucogenic epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS, like those of *P. sophore,* is covered by a mosaic pavement of epithelial cells. The micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells of these epithelia are separated by wide furrows and are extensive. In contrast, the micro-ridges in this fish often appear beaded, branched and interlocked to form intricate patterns (Fig. 21 a, b, c). Further, the micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent micro-ridges are more prominent and frequent. The boundaries between adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by well-defined double row of closely approximated micro-ridges often interconnected by transverse connections (Fig. 21 b, c).

Interspersed between the epithelial cells in the epithelia of the UL, the LL, the RC, the FSUR and the FSLS are observed wide, rounded crypts or pores of varied dimensions, like in *P. sophore.* Generally these crypts or pores occur where the boundaries of three or four epithelial cells meet. These could represent the openings of the mucous cells. This is further

confirmed by the presence of blobs of mucus in most of these crypts (Fig. 21 a, b, c).

relatively inconspicuous HUJS and the HLJS.

**9.1 Mucogenic epithelia 9.1.1 Epithelial cells**

**9.1.2 Mucous cells**

In the RC epithelium, small taste buds are located individually at long intervals (Fig. 22 a). In the epithelia of the UL and the LL, however, a large number of taste buds are observed, each located on a small epithelial papilla projecting at the surface (Fig. 22 a, b). The taste buds at the major distal potion of the lips are characteristically located in-groups arranged in parallel rows (Fig. 22 b, c). The arrangement of the epithelial cells at and around each papilla bearing a taste bud and the appearance of the taste buds at the summit of these papillae are similar to those in *P. sophore* and *G. lamta*.

#### **9.2 Keratinized epithelia**

The epithelial cells at the surface of the HUJS and the HLJS are studded with characteristic polygonal unculi (Fig. 23 a, b, c). The surface relief of each unculus appears truncated. Each unculus is raised significantly from the general surface as a narrow bend at the periphery and has a shallow depression at its major central region (Fig. 23 a, b, c). Further, the surface relief appears scraggy similar to those at the proximal regions of the HUJS and the HLJS of *P. sophore*. In contrast, the micro-ridges at the surface of each unculus are prominent, separated by wide spaces and do not fuse with each other. These micro-ridges are interwoven forming web-like patterns (Fig. 23 b, c). The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells, modified as unculi, are demarcated by distinct double rows of micro-ridges (Fig. 23 c). The space between these micro-ridges is relatively prominent and wide.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 167

**Figure 7 (a, b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs of the epithelium of the RC (a) and the FSUR (b) of N*. botia*. (Scale bar = 5 µm). Showing intricate patterns of micro-ridges at the

**Figure 8 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs of LL of *N. botia.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)**  Showing distinct protuberances separated by furrows. Each protuberance is studded with a large number of epithelial elevations. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. Showing taste buds at the apex of each epithelial elevation. **(c)** Same as (b) in still higher magnification. Showing the apex of each epithelial elevation characterised by the presence of numerous closely packed microvilli, which represent the taste hairs originating from taste cells of the taste buds. Note the epithelial cells at the epithelial elevations are concentrically arranged. **Figure 9 (a – d).** Scanning electron photomicrographs of HLJS of *N. botia.* (Scale bar = (a) 50 µm, (b, c, d) 5µm). **(a)** Showing the superficial layer epithelial cells at the distal region (arrow) that gradually get transformed into truncated unculi towards the prox imal region on the buccal cavity side of the HLJS (winged arrow). **(b)** Showing a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells at the distal region of the HLJS. Note distinct boundaries between the epithelial cells and characteristic rounded bulge in the central region of the epithelial cells. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing double row of micro-ridges demarcating the boundaries of the adjacent cells. Note the micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells are short, sinuous and compactly arranged. **(d)** Proximal region of the HLJS, towards buccal cavity showing the epithelial cells modified into truncated

**Figure 10 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of *C. fasciata* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b) showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (arrowhead), the UL (arrow) and the LL (winged arrow). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c - d)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of head region of *C. fasciata* in dorso-lateral view (c) and in front view (d), showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the HUJS (barred arrow), the HLJS (white arrow), the LL (winged arrow), the FSLS (cross) and

**Figure 11 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing the surface architecture of the HUJS (a, b) and the HLJS (c) of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 50 µm) **(a)** Note the difference in the surface architecture of the epithelia at the proximal region (arrow) and the distal region (winged arrows) of the HUJS. The epithelial cells in the distal region exfoliate at the surface. Note the presence of papilliform teeth like structures protruding at the surface. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** Note the difference in the surface architecture of the epithelium at the proximal region (arrow) and the distal region (winged arrow) of the HLJS. The epithelial cells in the distal region exfoliate at the surface. Note the presence of

**Figure 12 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing the surface architecture of the RC (a, b), the UL (c) of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells interspersed with mucous cell apertures (arrows). Epithelial cells with a series of micro-ridges and the boundaries demarcated by smooth welldefined un-interrupted double row of micro-ridges. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** The micro-ridges are short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of

surface of the epithelial cells. Note the presence of mucous cell apertures (arrows).

unculi.

small groups.

mouth (white star). (Scale bar = 400 µm).

papilliform teeth like structures protruding at the surface.

## **10. Explanation of figures**

**Figure 1 (a - b)** Photographs of a part of the dorso-lateral side of the head of *G. giuris,* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b) showing the RC (arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the FSUR (white arrowhead) and the LL (winged arrow) (Scale bar = 5 mm) **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the dorso-lateral side of the head of *G. giuris,* showing the RC (arrowhead), the FSUR (white arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the LL (winged arrow) and the mouth (white star). Several papilliform teeth are also observed inside the mouth. (Scale bar = 400 µm)

**Figure 2 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = (a) 30 µm, (b, c) 10 µm). **(a)** Showing the epithelial cells having a variable degree of invagination and small type I taste buds (arrows). **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing the surface of the epithelial cells characterised with smooth, extensive, uninterrupted micro-ridges traversing towards the deeper regions of concave depressions and are separated by wide furrows. Note fine micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent micro ridges (arrows).

**Figure 3 (a - b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC (a), the FSUR (b) of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing the surface of the epithelial cells is characterised with smooth, extensive, uninterrupted sometimes branched micro-ridges separated by wide furrows. Note boundary is demarcated by double row of micro-ridges (arrows) and fine micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent microridges (winged arrows). Note each epithelial cell shows slight concavity, compare with plate 51 (b, c). **(b)** Showing micro-ridges forming characteristic pattern on the epithelial cell surface and small mucous cell apertures (arrows).

**Figure 4 (a - b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = 20 µm) **(a)** Showing big type II taste buds located on the mounds of epithelial cells. Note the epithelial cells at each mound are characteristically arranged concentrically**. (b)** Showing superficial neuromast sunk slightly in the epithelium with characteristic cupula like structure.

**Figure 5 (a)** Photograph of the head region of *N. botia* showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow) and the RC (arrowhead). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(b - c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head of *N. botia* showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (barred arrow), the UL (arrow), the HUJS (white arrow), the HLJS (arrowhead), the LL (winged arrow) and mouth (white star) (Scale bar = 400µm).

**Figure 6 (a)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head of *N. botia* showing the RC, the FSUR, the UL, the HUJS, the HLJS and the LL. On the UL and the LL protuberances of various dimensions separated by furrows are discernible. (Scale bar = 200 µm). **(b)**  Scanning electron photomicrograph of the epithelium of the UL showing protuberances of variable dimensions delineated by narrow furrows. A part of the HUJS (arrow) and the FSUR (winged arrow) is also discernible. (Scale bar = 200 µm). **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of the epithelium of the FSUR showing characteristic pleats and a mosaic pavement of surface epithelial cells. (Scale bar = 20 µm).

**Figure 1 (a - b)** Photographs of a part of the dorso-lateral side of the head of *G. giuris,* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b) showing the RC (arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the FSUR (white arrowhead) and the LL (winged arrow) (Scale bar = 5 mm) **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the dorso-lateral side of the head of *G. giuris,* showing the RC (arrowhead), the FSUR (white arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the LL (winged arrow) and the mouth (white star). Several papilliform teeth are also observed inside the mouth.

**Figure 2 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = (a) 30 µm, (b, c) 10 µm). **(a)** Showing the epithelial cells having a variable degree of invagination and small type I taste buds (arrows). **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing the surface of the epithelial cells characterised with smooth, extensive, uninterrupted micro-ridges traversing towards the deeper regions of concave depressions and are separated by wide furrows. Note fine micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent

**Figure 3 (a - b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC (a), the FSUR (b) of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing the surface of the epithelial cells is characterised with smooth, extensive, uninterrupted sometimes branched micro-ridges separated by wide furrows. Note boundary is demarcated by double row of micro-ridges (arrows) and fine micro-bridges interconnecting the adjacent microridges (winged arrows). Note each epithelial cell shows slight concavity, compare with plate 51 (b, c). **(b)** Showing micro-ridges forming characteristic pattern on the epithelial cell

**Figure 4 (a - b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC of *G. giuris.* (Scale bar = 20 µm) **(a)** Showing big type II taste buds located on the mounds of epithelial cells. Note the epithelial cells at each mound are characteristically arranged concentrically**. (b)** Showing superficial neuromast sunk slightly

**Figure 5 (a)** Photograph of the head region of *N. botia* showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow) and the RC (arrowhead). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(b - c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head of *N. botia* showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (barred arrow), the UL (arrow), the HUJS (white arrow), the HLJS (arrowhead), the LL

**Figure 6 (a)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head of *N. botia* showing the RC, the FSUR, the UL, the HUJS, the HLJS and the LL. On the UL and the LL protuberances of various dimensions separated by furrows are discernible. (Scale bar = 200 µm). **(b)**  Scanning electron photomicrograph of the epithelium of the UL showing protuberances of variable dimensions delineated by narrow furrows. A part of the HUJS (arrow) and the FSUR (winged arrow) is also discernible. (Scale bar = 200 µm). **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of the epithelium of the FSUR showing characteristic pleats and a mosaic

**10. Explanation of figures**

(Scale bar = 400 µm)

micro ridges (arrows).

surface and small mucous cell apertures (arrows).

in the epithelium with characteristic cupula like structure.

(winged arrow) and mouth (white star) (Scale bar = 400µm).

pavement of surface epithelial cells. (Scale bar = 20 µm).

**Figure 7 (a, b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs of the epithelium of the RC (a) and the FSUR (b) of N*. botia*. (Scale bar = 5 µm). Showing intricate patterns of micro-ridges at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note the presence of mucous cell apertures (arrows).

**Figure 8 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs of LL of *N. botia.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)**  Showing distinct protuberances separated by furrows. Each protuberance is studded with a large number of epithelial elevations. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. Showing taste buds at the apex of each epithelial elevation. **(c)** Same as (b) in still higher magnification. Showing the apex of each epithelial elevation characterised by the presence of numerous closely packed microvilli, which represent the taste hairs originating from taste cells of the taste buds. Note the epithelial cells at the epithelial elevations are concentrically arranged.

**Figure 9 (a – d).** Scanning electron photomicrographs of HLJS of *N. botia.* (Scale bar = (a) 50 µm, (b, c, d) 5µm). **(a)** Showing the superficial layer epithelial cells at the distal region (arrow) that gradually get transformed into truncated unculi towards the prox imal region on the buccal cavity side of the HLJS (winged arrow). **(b)** Showing a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells at the distal region of the HLJS. Note distinct boundaries between the epithelial cells and characteristic rounded bulge in the central region of the epithelial cells. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing double row of micro-ridges demarcating the boundaries of the adjacent cells. Note the micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells are short, sinuous and compactly arranged. **(d)** Proximal region of the HLJS, towards buccal cavity showing the epithelial cells modified into truncated unculi.

**Figure 10 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of *C. fasciata* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b) showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (arrowhead), the UL (arrow) and the LL (winged arrow). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c - d)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of head region of *C. fasciata* in dorso-lateral view (c) and in front view (d), showing the RC (white arrowhead), the FSUR (arrowhead), the UL (arrow), the HUJS (barred arrow), the HLJS (white arrow), the LL (winged arrow), the FSLS (cross) and mouth (white star). (Scale bar = 400 µm).

**Figure 11 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing the surface architecture of the HUJS (a, b) and the HLJS (c) of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 50 µm) **(a)** Note the difference in the surface architecture of the epithelia at the proximal region (arrow) and the distal region (winged arrows) of the HUJS. The epithelial cells in the distal region exfoliate at the surface. Note the presence of papilliform teeth like structures protruding at the surface. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** Note the difference in the surface architecture of the epithelium at the proximal region (arrow) and the distal region (winged arrow) of the HLJS. The epithelial cells in the distal region exfoliate at the surface. Note the presence of papilliform teeth like structures protruding at the surface.

**Figure 12 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing the surface architecture of the RC (a, b), the UL (c) of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells interspersed with mucous cell apertures (arrows). Epithelial cells with a series of micro-ridges and the boundaries demarcated by smooth welldefined un-interrupted double row of micro-ridges. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. **(c)** The micro-ridges are short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of small groups.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 169

**Figure 19** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia at the distal region of the HLJS **(a)** and at the proximal region of the HLJS **(b, c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Same as 21 c, in higher magnification, showing the superficial layer epithelial cells modified in to truncated unculi. Note the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by distinct micro-ridges (arrows). **(b)** Showing scraggy surface relief of the unculi. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing the scrawly surface of the unculi. The microvillar projections occupying the central part of each unculus give a frothy appearance to the surface. Note, between the unculi the boundaries of the

**Figure 20 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of C. carpio showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow), the RC (arrowhead). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c – d)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head with open mouth showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow), the RC (arrowhead) and the FSUR (winged arrow) and mouth (white star) of

**Figure 21 (a - c)**. Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL (a, c) and the RC (b) of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells with micro-ridges forming intricate patterns. Note mucous cell apertures (arrows) at the boundary of the epithelial cells. **(b)** Showing micro-ridges forming intricate patterns at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note fine transverse connections in between the micro-ridges (winged arrows) and mucous cell apertures (arrows). **(c)** Showing micro-ridges forming intricate patterns at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note fine transverse connections in between the micro-ridges (winged

**Figure 22 (a - d)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC (a) and the LL (b, c, d) of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = (a, b, c) 50 µm and (d) 10 µm). **(a)** Showing a mosaic pavement of the epithelial cells and a taste bud at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells (arrow). **(b)** Showing major mucogenic region characterised with the presence of a large number of taste buds arranged in parallel rows. Note a narrow keratinized region, the surface of which appears rough and studded with pebble like structures (winged arrows). **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification. **(d)** Showing a taste bud

**Figure 23 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelium of HLJS of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing truncated polygonal unculi with concavity in the central region of each unculus. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. Note prominent micro-ridges at the surface of the unculi, separated by wide spaces. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification. Note the boundaries of the adjacent unculi are

Research on lips and associated structures began about 200 years ago, as described by Anson, 1929 in his manuscript "The comparative anatomy of the lips and labial villi of vertebrates". He made an attempt to define lips and on Danforth's interpretation of homology, homologous lips are found at certain stages of development in some representatives of all classes of vertebrates. The primary lips characteristic of selachians,

adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by distinct micro-ridges (arrows).

*C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 400 μm). **(c)** front view **(d)** lateral view.

arrows) and mucous cell apertures (arrows).

(arrow) at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells.

demarcated by double row of micro-ridges.

**11. Discussion**

**Figure 13 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing surface architecture of the FSUR (a), the LL (b, c) of *C. fasciata*. (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells. **(b)** The micro-ridges are short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of small groups. Note a taste bud at the summit of a papilla like projection (arrow). The epithelial cells are arranged concentrically around the taste bud. **(c)** Showing taste buds at the summit of papilla like projections on the surface of the LL thrown in to papillae like projections protruding beyond the general surface of the epithelia. At the summit of each such papilla several microvilli representing the taste hairs of the taste buds are located.

**Figure 14 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the HLJS of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 20 µm) **(a)** Showing a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells. A part of the lower lip is also visible (arrow). **(b)**  Showing ill-defined micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells at the proximal region of the HLJS. Note the boundaries between the adjacent epithelial cells are delineated either by shallow clefts (arrows) or by double row of micro-ridges (winged arrows). **(c)** Showing the epithelium at the transitional zone between the proximal region and the distal region of the HLJS. Note an epithelial cell separated from the underlying epithelial cell before its exfoliation (arrow). Impressions left on the surface (winged arrows) of the epithelium is due to the exfoliated epithelial cells. The surface of the epithelial cells at the distal region is characterised with punctated micro-ridges.

**Figure 15 (a – b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the distal region of the HUJS of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 5 µm) **(a)** Micro-ridges at the surface are either punctated or are short and sinuous. Note an exfoliated epithelial cell (arrow). **(b)** Showing prominent and raised micro-ridges in the central region of the epithelial cells (arrows).

**Figure 16 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of *P. sophore* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b), showing the upper lip (UL), the lower lip (LL), the rostral cap (RC) ,the fold of skin between UL and RC (FSUR) and the fold of skin between LL and ventral head skin (FSLS). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the lateral side of mouth of *P. sophore* (Scale bar = 400 μm).

**Figure 17** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL **(a),** the FSUR **(b)** and the LL **(c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing micro-ridges arranged characteristically (arrows) at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note wide mucous cell apertures (winged arrows). **(b)** Showing characteristic pattern of microridges at the surface epithelial cells. **(c)** Showing a taste bud at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells. Note the epithelial cells surrounding the taste bud are arranged concentrically.

**Figure 18** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL **(a),** distal region of HLJS and the LL **(b)** and distal region of the HLJS **(c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing a large number of taste buds (arrows). **(b)** Showing truncated unculi at the HLJS (arrows) and taste buds at the LL (winged arrows). **(c)** Showing truncated unculi with central concavity and raised margins.

**Figure 13 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph showing surface architecture of the FSUR (a), the LL (b, c) of *C. fasciata*. (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells. **(b)** The micro-ridges are short, straight or sinuous and smooth often arranged in the form of small groups. Note a taste bud at the summit of a papilla like projection (arrow). The epithelial cells are arranged concentrically around the taste bud. **(c)** Showing taste buds at the summit of papilla like projections on the surface of the LL thrown in to papillae like projections protruding beyond the general surface of the epithelia. At the summit of each such papilla several microvilli representing the taste hairs

**Figure 14 (a - c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the HLJS of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 20 µm) **(a)** Showing a mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells. A part of the lower lip is also visible (arrow). **(b)**  Showing ill-defined micro-ridges on the surface of the epithelial cells at the proximal region of the HLJS. Note the boundaries between the adjacent epithelial cells are delineated either by shallow clefts (arrows) or by double row of micro-ridges (winged arrows). **(c)** Showing the epithelium at the transitional zone between the proximal region and the distal region of the HLJS. Note an epithelial cell separated from the underlying epithelial cell before its exfoliation (arrow). Impressions left on the surface (winged arrows) of the epithelium is due to the exfoliated epithelial cells. The surface of the epithelial cells at the distal region is

**Figure 15 (a – b)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the distal region of the HUJS of *C. fasciata.* (Scale bar = 5 µm) **(a)** Micro-ridges at the surface are either punctated or are short and sinuous. Note an exfoliated epithelial cell (arrow). **(b)** Showing prominent and raised micro-ridges in the central region of the

**Figure 16 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of *P. sophore* with closed mouth (a) and with open mouth (b), showing the upper lip (UL), the lower lip (LL), the rostral cap (RC) ,the fold of skin between UL and RC (FSUR) and the fold of skin between LL and ventral head skin (FSLS). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the

**Figure 17** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL **(a),** the FSUR **(b)** and the LL **(c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing micro-ridges arranged characteristically (arrows) at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note wide mucous cell apertures (winged arrows). **(b)** Showing characteristic pattern of microridges at the surface epithelial cells. **(c)** Showing a taste bud at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells. Note the epithelial cells surrounding the taste bud are arranged

**Figure 18** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL **(a),** distal region of HLJS and the LL **(b)** and distal region of the HLJS **(c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 10 µm). **(a)** Showing a large number of taste buds (arrows). **(b)** Showing truncated unculi at the HLJS (arrows) and taste buds at the LL (winged arrows). **(c)** Showing

of the taste buds are located.

epithelial cells (arrows).

concentrically.

characterised with punctated micro-ridges.

lateral side of mouth of *P. sophore* (Scale bar = 400 μm).

truncated unculi with central concavity and raised margins.

**Figure 19** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia at the distal region of the HLJS **(a)** and at the proximal region of the HLJS **(b, c)** of *P. sophore.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Same as 21 c, in higher magnification, showing the superficial layer epithelial cells modified in to truncated unculi. Note the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by distinct micro-ridges (arrows). **(b)** Showing scraggy surface relief of the unculi. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification, showing the scrawly surface of the unculi. The microvillar projections occupying the central part of each unculus give a frothy appearance to the surface. Note, between the unculi the boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells are demarcated by distinct micro-ridges (arrows).

**Figure 20 (a – b)** Photographs of the head region of C. carpio showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow), the RC (arrowhead). (Scale bar = 5 mm). **(c – d)** Scanning electron photomicrograph of a part of the head with open mouth showing the UL (arrow), the LL (white arrow), the RC (arrowhead) and the FSUR (winged arrow) and mouth (white star) of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 400 μm). **(c)** front view **(d)** lateral view.

**Figure 21 (a - c)**. Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the UL (a, c) and the RC (b) of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing mosaic pavement of irregularly polygonal epithelial cells with micro-ridges forming intricate patterns. Note mucous cell apertures (arrows) at the boundary of the epithelial cells. **(b)** Showing micro-ridges forming intricate patterns at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note fine transverse connections in between the micro-ridges (winged arrows) and mucous cell apertures (arrows). **(c)** Showing micro-ridges forming intricate patterns at the surface of the epithelial cells. Note fine transverse connections in between the micro-ridges (winged arrows) and mucous cell apertures (arrows).

**Figure 22 (a - d)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelia of the RC (a) and the LL (b, c, d) of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = (a, b, c) 50 µm and (d) 10 µm). **(a)** Showing a mosaic pavement of the epithelial cells and a taste bud at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells (arrow). **(b)** Showing major mucogenic region characterised with the presence of a large number of taste buds arranged in parallel rows. Note a narrow keratinized region, the surface of which appears rough and studded with pebble like structures (winged arrows). **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification. **(d)** Showing a taste bud (arrow) at the apex of a mound of epithelial cells.

**Figure 23 (a – c)** Scanning electron photomicrographs showing surface architecture of the epithelium of HLJS of *C. carpio.* (Scale bar = 5 µm). **(a)** Showing truncated polygonal unculi with concavity in the central region of each unculus. **(b)** Same as (a) in higher magnification. Note prominent micro-ridges at the surface of the unculi, separated by wide spaces. **(c)** Same as (b) in higher magnification. Note the boundaries of the adjacent unculi are demarcated by double row of micro-ridges.

## **11. Discussion**

Research on lips and associated structures began about 200 years ago, as described by Anson, 1929 in his manuscript "The comparative anatomy of the lips and labial villi of vertebrates". He made an attempt to define lips and on Danforth's interpretation of homology, homologous lips are found at certain stages of development in some representatives of all classes of vertebrates. The primary lips characteristic of selachians,

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 171

bridges. It should be pointed out that such specific structures connecting micro-ridges have also been reported previously in fish epidermis (Whitear, 1990) and have been variously named as interconnections (Reutter *et al*., 1974), micro-bridges (Karlsson, 1983), crossbridges (Avella & Ehrenfeld, 1997). Previous workers have not commented on the functional significance of these structural peculiarities. It is possible that these structures may provide

Secretions elaborated by the epithelial cells and the mucous cells in the mucogenic epithelia could be regarded as an adaptation to lubricate and protect the epithelia from abrasion (Pinky et al., 2002). The role of mucus was likewise postulated previously to inhibit the invasion and proliferation of pathogenic micro-organisms and to prevent their colonisation in fish epidermis (Nigrelli, 1937; Nigrelli et al., 1955; Hildemann, 1962; Liguori et al., 1963;

In the oral cavity the lining mucous membrane becomes keratinized to varying degrees in different animals and also in different areas of the mouth (Adams, 1976). Some of the most dramatic advances made over the past 2-3 decades in epidermal research have come about through the utilization of newly developed biochemical investigative techniques, examples of which include the use of gene cloning to study the organization of the keratin gene family, and the use of immuno-fluorescence with monoclonal antibodies to discern when various keratin proteins appear during differentiation. In SEM studies, the Keratinized surfaces of the fishes studied are shaggy and are matted with an organised array of horny projections separated by shallow grooves. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells (the surfaces of which are modified into unculi) are demarcated by well-defined and distinct

Horny projections from single cells of lips and associated structures have been reported in a wide variety of fishes by various workers (Leydig, 1895; Rauther, 1911; 1928; Hora, 1922; Minzenmay, 1933; Saxena, 1959; Thys, 1961; Kaiser, 1962; Lal *et al*., 1966; Saxena & Chandy, 1966; Roberts, 1982). Girgis (1952), in a herbivorous bottom feeder *Labeo horie*, observed horny protuberances on lips and two sharp horny cutting edges lying in the upper and lower borders of mouth immediately inside the lips. Mester (1971) made a morphohistological analysis of the buccopharyngeal cavity in *Noemacheilus barbatulus*, and reported horny plates on the inner surface of the lips that are used by the fish for trituration of nutrients. Verighina (1971) while describing the structure of the digestive tract, reported the presence of horny cutting edge on the lower lip of periphyton eater fish *Chondrostoma nasus variabile*. Agrawal & Mittal (1992 a) reported the presence of keratinized unculi on the ventral side of the upper lip and keratinized cone like structure with sharp cutting edge on the horny lower jaw sheath associated with the lower lip of an omnivorous bottom feeder, *Cirrhina mrigala.* Agrawal & Mittal (1992 b) observed keratinized unculi on the ventral side of the upper lip and on the dorsal side of the lower lip facing the mouth opening. In addition, they observed keratinized cone like structure on the horny upper jaw sheath and on the horny lower jaw sheath associated with the lips of a herbivorous column feeder, *Labeo*

The present study shows that in *N. botia*, *C. fasciata, G. lamta, P. sophore* and *C. carpio* the UL and the LL, on the side facing the mouth opening, are associated with the horny upper jaw sheath (HUJS) and the horny lower jaw sheath (HLJS) respectively. The horny jaw sheaths

mechanical strength to the micro-ridges. However, it is open to other interpretations.

Lewis, 1970).

rows of microridges.

*rohita.*

are absent in *G. giuris* having few villiform teeth*.*

after the maxillary and premaxillary bones have developed within the territory of the upper lip (toadfish, cod), may disappear (trout, Spelerpes), accompanied by a forward migration of the lower jaw. The secondary lips of higher forms are first indicated in certain teleosts and amphibians. Lips vary in structure to accord with their physiological functions, whether sensory, prehensile, or adhesive (Anson, 1929). By precise comparative morphology and gene expression analyses, a possibility was inferred that ammocoete lips may not be identical to gnathostome jaws (Kuratani, 2003).

The surface architecture of the superficial layer of epithelial cells in the lips and associated structures is characterised by specialised structures, the micro-ridges forming different patterns in different fish species investigated in this study. These structures in other fishes, have been described as cytoplasmic folds (Merrilees, 1974), microvilli (Harris & Hunt, 1975), microfolds (Hunter & Nayudu, 1978) or ridges (Iger *et al*., 1988). Insofar as these structures appeared as micro-ridges under SEM and microvilli under TEM. The term "microridges" is used in this study following Whitear & Mittal (1986), Whitear (1990), Suzuki (1992) and Whitear & Moate (1998) and seems appropriate.

The micro-ridges on the surfaces of the mucogenic epithelia form characteristic maze like patterns in different fish species. Fishelson, (1984) correlated the variations in micro-ridge pattern with the locomotory activity of the fish. He suggested that in faster swimming fishes, micro-ridges are most developed and serve to trap mucus on the epithelial surface. The present study, however, is not in support of this since micro-ridges are well developed and conspicuous on the free surface of the lips and associated structures in all the six fish species investigated showing significant difference in their habits and habitats.

The retention of secretion has been the most popular hypothesis of micro-ridge function (Hughes & Wright, 1970; Hughes, 1979; Tillman *et al*., 1977; Meyer-Rochow, 1981; Fishelson, 1984). Modifications in the pattern of micro-ridges can also be caused by various intrinsic, e.g. hormonal (Schwerdtfeger, 1979 a, b), or extrinsic factors e.g. temperature (Ferri, 1982), salinity (Ferri, 1983), mercury salts (Pereira, 1988), organic pollutants, (Iger *et al.*, 1988), handling and ectoparasites (Whitear, 1990). Some speculations about the function of microridges have centred on mechanical considerations (Lanzing & Higginbotham, 1974; Hawkes, 1974; Sibbling & Uribe, 1985). The provision of reserve apical membrane to allow for distortion was postulated by Zeiske *et al*., (1976) but Sperry & Wassersug (1976) found no change of pattern after stretching fish oesophageal epithelium and suggested that spread of mucus from goblet (mucous) cells might be guided by the direction of ridges.

Presence of conspicuous micro-ridges on the surfaces of the mucogenic epithelia in the fish species investigated could be considered to reflect high secretory activity of the surface epithelial cells in these regions. Secretion of glycoproteins (GPs), shown histochemically (Pinky et al., 2008, Tripathi & Mittal, 2010), in the surface epithelial cells in the mucogenic regions is in support of this. Further, Whitear (1990) proposed that the form of micro-ridges correlate with the type and rate of secretion at the cell apex. The development of microridges would then be a consequence of arrival of new membranes as vesicles carrying the secretion fuse with the apical plasmalemma and high ridges would indicate a rapid sequence of arrival of secretory vesicles at the surface.

In the epithelia of lips and associated structures of all fish species studied*,* the adjacent micro-ridges are often interconnected with each other by fine cross connections i.e. micro-

after the maxillary and premaxillary bones have developed within the territory of the upper lip (toadfish, cod), may disappear (trout, Spelerpes), accompanied by a forward migration of the lower jaw. The secondary lips of higher forms are first indicated in certain teleosts and amphibians. Lips vary in structure to accord with their physiological functions, whether sensory, prehensile, or adhesive (Anson, 1929). By precise comparative morphology and gene expression analyses, a possibility was inferred that ammocoete lips may not be

The surface architecture of the superficial layer of epithelial cells in the lips and associated structures is characterised by specialised structures, the micro-ridges forming different patterns in different fish species investigated in this study. These structures in other fishes, have been described as cytoplasmic folds (Merrilees, 1974), microvilli (Harris & Hunt, 1975), microfolds (Hunter & Nayudu, 1978) or ridges (Iger *et al*., 1988). Insofar as these structures appeared as micro-ridges under SEM and microvilli under TEM. The term "microridges" is used in this study following Whitear & Mittal (1986), Whitear (1990), Suzuki (1992) and

The micro-ridges on the surfaces of the mucogenic epithelia form characteristic maze like patterns in different fish species. Fishelson, (1984) correlated the variations in micro-ridge pattern with the locomotory activity of the fish. He suggested that in faster swimming fishes, micro-ridges are most developed and serve to trap mucus on the epithelial surface. The present study, however, is not in support of this since micro-ridges are well developed and conspicuous on the free surface of the lips and associated structures in all the six fish

The retention of secretion has been the most popular hypothesis of micro-ridge function (Hughes & Wright, 1970; Hughes, 1979; Tillman *et al*., 1977; Meyer-Rochow, 1981; Fishelson, 1984). Modifications in the pattern of micro-ridges can also be caused by various intrinsic, e.g. hormonal (Schwerdtfeger, 1979 a, b), or extrinsic factors e.g. temperature (Ferri, 1982), salinity (Ferri, 1983), mercury salts (Pereira, 1988), organic pollutants, (Iger *et al.*, 1988), handling and ectoparasites (Whitear, 1990). Some speculations about the function of microridges have centred on mechanical considerations (Lanzing & Higginbotham, 1974; Hawkes, 1974; Sibbling & Uribe, 1985). The provision of reserve apical membrane to allow for distortion was postulated by Zeiske *et al*., (1976) but Sperry & Wassersug (1976) found no change of pattern after stretching fish oesophageal epithelium and suggested that spread of

Presence of conspicuous micro-ridges on the surfaces of the mucogenic epithelia in the fish species investigated could be considered to reflect high secretory activity of the surface epithelial cells in these regions. Secretion of glycoproteins (GPs), shown histochemically (Pinky et al., 2008, Tripathi & Mittal, 2010), in the surface epithelial cells in the mucogenic regions is in support of this. Further, Whitear (1990) proposed that the form of micro-ridges correlate with the type and rate of secretion at the cell apex. The development of microridges would then be a consequence of arrival of new membranes as vesicles carrying the secretion fuse with the apical plasmalemma and high ridges would indicate a rapid

In the epithelia of lips and associated structures of all fish species studied*,* the adjacent micro-ridges are often interconnected with each other by fine cross connections i.e. micro-

species investigated showing significant difference in their habits and habitats.

mucus from goblet (mucous) cells might be guided by the direction of ridges.

sequence of arrival of secretory vesicles at the surface.

identical to gnathostome jaws (Kuratani, 2003).

Whitear & Moate (1998) and seems appropriate.

bridges. It should be pointed out that such specific structures connecting micro-ridges have also been reported previously in fish epidermis (Whitear, 1990) and have been variously named as interconnections (Reutter *et al*., 1974), micro-bridges (Karlsson, 1983), crossbridges (Avella & Ehrenfeld, 1997). Previous workers have not commented on the functional significance of these structural peculiarities. It is possible that these structures may provide mechanical strength to the micro-ridges. However, it is open to other interpretations.

Secretions elaborated by the epithelial cells and the mucous cells in the mucogenic epithelia could be regarded as an adaptation to lubricate and protect the epithelia from abrasion (Pinky et al., 2002). The role of mucus was likewise postulated previously to inhibit the invasion and proliferation of pathogenic micro-organisms and to prevent their colonisation in fish epidermis (Nigrelli, 1937; Nigrelli et al., 1955; Hildemann, 1962; Liguori et al., 1963; Lewis, 1970).

In the oral cavity the lining mucous membrane becomes keratinized to varying degrees in different animals and also in different areas of the mouth (Adams, 1976). Some of the most dramatic advances made over the past 2-3 decades in epidermal research have come about through the utilization of newly developed biochemical investigative techniques, examples of which include the use of gene cloning to study the organization of the keratin gene family, and the use of immuno-fluorescence with monoclonal antibodies to discern when various keratin proteins appear during differentiation. In SEM studies, the Keratinized surfaces of the fishes studied are shaggy and are matted with an organised array of horny projections separated by shallow grooves. The boundaries of the adjacent epithelial cells (the surfaces of which are modified into unculi) are demarcated by well-defined and distinct rows of microridges.

Horny projections from single cells of lips and associated structures have been reported in a wide variety of fishes by various workers (Leydig, 1895; Rauther, 1911; 1928; Hora, 1922; Minzenmay, 1933; Saxena, 1959; Thys, 1961; Kaiser, 1962; Lal *et al*., 1966; Saxena & Chandy, 1966; Roberts, 1982). Girgis (1952), in a herbivorous bottom feeder *Labeo horie*, observed horny protuberances on lips and two sharp horny cutting edges lying in the upper and lower borders of mouth immediately inside the lips. Mester (1971) made a morphohistological analysis of the buccopharyngeal cavity in *Noemacheilus barbatulus*, and reported horny plates on the inner surface of the lips that are used by the fish for trituration of nutrients. Verighina (1971) while describing the structure of the digestive tract, reported the presence of horny cutting edge on the lower lip of periphyton eater fish *Chondrostoma nasus variabile*. Agrawal & Mittal (1992 a) reported the presence of keratinized unculi on the ventral side of the upper lip and keratinized cone like structure with sharp cutting edge on the horny lower jaw sheath associated with the lower lip of an omnivorous bottom feeder, *Cirrhina mrigala.* Agrawal & Mittal (1992 b) observed keratinized unculi on the ventral side of the upper lip and on the dorsal side of the lower lip facing the mouth opening. In addition, they observed keratinized cone like structure on the horny upper jaw sheath and on the horny lower jaw sheath associated with the lips of a herbivorous column feeder, *Labeo rohita.*

The present study shows that in *N. botia*, *C. fasciata, G. lamta, P. sophore* and *C. carpio* the UL and the LL, on the side facing the mouth opening, are associated with the horny upper jaw sheath (HUJS) and the horny lower jaw sheath (HLJS) respectively. The horny jaw sheaths are absent in *G. giuris* having few villiform teeth*.*

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 173

Presence of large number of taste buds in *C. carpio* and *N. botia* could be due to its habit to live at the muddy bottom of water bodies. *C. carpio* browses on the shallow bottom and margins, takes in vegetable debris, insects, worms, crustaceans and also planktonic algae. *N. botia* is a bottom dwelling fish, which accepts any kind of food and feeds on algal films as well. At muddy bottoms the visibility, in general, is poor owing to (i) depth and (ii) increase in turbidity caused by the disturbance of the bottom mud due to the movements of the fish, which is in habit of suddenly burrowing into the mud or sand on the bottom to protect itself from predators. The presence of a large number of taste buds increases the probability of detecting and locating accurately prey concealed by darkness or turbidity and may also permit the accurate location of small food particles, which would be missed otherwise.

The taste buds in the lips and associated structures of all the six fish species investigated remain encircled by characteristic concentric whorls of epidermal cells. Harvey & Batty (1998), suggested that it was sometimes possible to locate and count taste buds by the presence of the characteristic ring of epidermal cells surrounding the sensory apex, even

Earlier SEM studies reported that fish taste buds fall into three categories based on their external surface morphology (Reutter *et al.*, 1974; Ezeasor, 1982). In addition to the three types of taste buds previously described from various teleost fish, a fourth type comprising very small buds, was found in some cardinal fish (Fishelson, 2004)*.* The taste buds in the mouth cavity of *Rita rita* are of three types which are elevated from the epithelium at different levels, which may be useful for ensuring full utilization of the gustatory ability of the fish, detection and analysing of taste substances, as well as for assessing the quality and palatability of food, during its retention in the mouth cavity (Yashpal et al., 2006). In *C. mrigala*, there is only one type of taste buds observed in mouth cavity (Yashpal et al., 2009).In the present study only one type of taste buds are observed in the 5 fish species whereas in *G. giuris* there are two types of

In *G. giuris*, in addition to the taste buds, specialised sensory structures the superficial neuromasts are also observed in the epithelium of the RC and in the epithelia of the FSLS close to the ventral head skin. Neuromasts can be found on the entire body surface including the tail with the cupulae extending into the water (Schellart & Wubbels, 1998;

The fishes studied are characterised by the peculiar trophic niche they occupy: many scrape epilithic or epiphytic algae and other food items from submerged substrates. This specialized feeding type is possible thanks to the remarkably formed, ventrally placed suckermouth of *G. lamta* that allows itself to attach to a surface while scraping and eating the food attached to it. In spite of this highly specialized feeding apparatus, diversity in both thickness of the different regions of lips and in shape of lips exists, and these fishes actually feed on a broad range of food. As such, Cyprinidae are the most specialized and successful fish family within the order Cypriniformes. More basal families within the teleosts like Gobiidae, Cobitidae and Belontiidae mostly display a more general (non-specialized) feeding mode, with a typical feeding apparatus suitable for finding and processing insects and other food items that abound in the water column or in the bottom. Some knowledge exists on the trophic, evolutionary trend in the group, but detailed studies dealing with the morphology of lips and associated structures or the feeding apparatus are few and often

taste buds are observed in different regions of lips and associated epithelia.

Eastman & Lannoo, 2003; Tarby and Webb, 2003; Sane et. al., 2009).

when the apex itself was damaged or missing.

fragmentary.

Keratinization occurs in the structures associated with lips of fish *Garra lamta* by histochemical investigations (Pinky et al., 2004). The unculi also observed in the upper jaw of an herbivorous fish, *Cirrhinus mrigala* by SEM studies. More recently, in *Puntius sophore*, the HUJS and the HLJS are keratinized. The surface epithelial cells in these regions are modified to form single cell modification—the unculi, give positive results for keratin with histochemical reactions. The unculi appear functionally significant on the lips and associated structure in this fish species lacking jaw teeth (Tripathi & Mittal, 2010).

In the epithelia of the RC and the AP in *G. lamta* and those of the HUJS and the HLJS in *C. fasciata*, however, both mucogenic and keratinized regions are observed. In *C. fasciata* the apical regions of the horny jaw sheaths are modified into cone like structures each consisting of several superimposed keratinized epithelial cells. The spine like or conical unculi in the keratinized regions of the RC and AP of *G. lamta* may be considered to facilitate clinging or adherence of the fish to the substratum by engaging irregularities on the surface of rocks or stones. Truncated unculi on the surface of HUJS and HLJS in 4 fish species investigated except *G. giuris* and apical cone like structure of the horny jaw sheaths in *C. fasciata* may have a function to assist the fish in scooping mud from the bottom in search of food or to act as sharp cutting edge assisting the fish to browse upon or scrape the food attached with the substratum for feeding.

The keratinized epithelia are mainly composed of the epithelial cells only. The mucous cells and the taste buds are not observed. The absence of the gland cells in the keratinized epithelia suggests an inverse relationship between the degree of keratinization and slime secretion.

In most vertebrates the sense of taste is used as a close range receptor for food item discrimination. Fish are unique among vertebrates in having taste buds widely distributed over various regions. The present study shows that*,* the taste buds in the epithelia of the lips and structures associated with them are conspicuous in *C. fasciata* and are small and inconspicuous in *G. giuris.* In both these fish species, however, the taste buds are few and could be located at long intervals. This indicates that the cutaneous gustatory function in these fish species is probably of less importance. Low density of taste buds, in *G. giuris* having active predatory habit could be associated with the presence of superficial neuromasts and canal neuromasts in the localisation of its prey. This is supported by reports that the taste buds are absent on the lips of the ox-eye herring *Megalops cyprinoides* (Pasha, 1964 c), are poorly developed on lips of *Channa striata* (Agarwal & Mittal, 1994) and are relatively few on the outer surface of the body than those on the lips and palatal organs and gills in *Pseudorasbora parva* (Kiyohara *et al*., 1980) all these fishes are active predators.

In the lips and associated structures of *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* taste buds, as compared to those in *C. fasciata* and *G. giuris,* are very prominent and are distributed in large numbers. This indicates the development of acute gustatory function, an adaptation to the peculiar mode of life of these fishes. A similar correlation between the distribution of taste buds and gustatory feeding has been shown in two races of the Mexican characin, *Astyanax mexicanus*; one lives in caves and is sightless, and the other lives in river and is visually normal. Schemmel (1967) has shown that the cave-dwelling race has a larger number and a more extensive distribution of external buds than the river-dwelling race, corresponding to acute gustatory feeding behaviour.

Keratinization occurs in the structures associated with lips of fish *Garra lamta* by histochemical investigations (Pinky et al., 2004). The unculi also observed in the upper jaw of an herbivorous fish, *Cirrhinus mrigala* by SEM studies. More recently, in *Puntius sophore*, the HUJS and the HLJS are keratinized. The surface epithelial cells in these regions are modified to form single cell modification—the unculi, give positive results for keratin with histochemical reactions. The unculi appear functionally significant on the lips and

In the epithelia of the RC and the AP in *G. lamta* and those of the HUJS and the HLJS in *C. fasciata*, however, both mucogenic and keratinized regions are observed. In *C. fasciata* the apical regions of the horny jaw sheaths are modified into cone like structures each consisting of several superimposed keratinized epithelial cells. The spine like or conical unculi in the keratinized regions of the RC and AP of *G. lamta* may be considered to facilitate clinging or adherence of the fish to the substratum by engaging irregularities on the surface of rocks or stones. Truncated unculi on the surface of HUJS and HLJS in 4 fish species investigated except *G. giuris* and apical cone like structure of the horny jaw sheaths in *C. fasciata* may have a function to assist the fish in scooping mud from the bottom in search of food or to act as sharp cutting edge assisting the fish to browse upon or scrape the food attached with the

The keratinized epithelia are mainly composed of the epithelial cells only. The mucous cells and the taste buds are not observed. The absence of the gland cells in the keratinized epithelia suggests an inverse relationship between the degree of keratinization and slime

In most vertebrates the sense of taste is used as a close range receptor for food item discrimination. Fish are unique among vertebrates in having taste buds widely distributed over various regions. The present study shows that*,* the taste buds in the epithelia of the lips and structures associated with them are conspicuous in *C. fasciata* and are small and inconspicuous in *G. giuris.* In both these fish species, however, the taste buds are few and could be located at long intervals. This indicates that the cutaneous gustatory function in these fish species is probably of less importance. Low density of taste buds, in *G. giuris* having active predatory habit could be associated with the presence of superficial neuromasts and canal neuromasts in the localisation of its prey. This is supported by reports that the taste buds are absent on the lips of the ox-eye herring *Megalops cyprinoides* (Pasha, 1964 c), are poorly developed on lips of *Channa striata* (Agarwal & Mittal, 1994) and are relatively few on the outer surface of the body than those on the lips and palatal organs and

gills in *Pseudorasbora parva* (Kiyohara *et al*., 1980) all these fishes are active predators.

corresponding to acute gustatory feeding behaviour.

In the lips and associated structures of *G. lamta, P. sophore, C. carpio* and *N. botia* taste buds, as compared to those in *C. fasciata* and *G. giuris,* are very prominent and are distributed in large numbers. This indicates the development of acute gustatory function, an adaptation to the peculiar mode of life of these fishes. A similar correlation between the distribution of taste buds and gustatory feeding has been shown in two races of the Mexican characin, *Astyanax mexicanus*; one lives in caves and is sightless, and the other lives in river and is visually normal. Schemmel (1967) has shown that the cave-dwelling race has a larger number and a more extensive distribution of external buds than the river-dwelling race,

associated structure in this fish species lacking jaw teeth (Tripathi & Mittal, 2010).

substratum for feeding.

secretion.

Presence of large number of taste buds in *C. carpio* and *N. botia* could be due to its habit to live at the muddy bottom of water bodies. *C. carpio* browses on the shallow bottom and margins, takes in vegetable debris, insects, worms, crustaceans and also planktonic algae. *N. botia* is a bottom dwelling fish, which accepts any kind of food and feeds on algal films as well. At muddy bottoms the visibility, in general, is poor owing to (i) depth and (ii) increase in turbidity caused by the disturbance of the bottom mud due to the movements of the fish, which is in habit of suddenly burrowing into the mud or sand on the bottom to protect itself from predators. The presence of a large number of taste buds increases the probability of detecting and locating accurately prey concealed by darkness or turbidity and may also permit the accurate location of small food particles, which would be missed otherwise.

The taste buds in the lips and associated structures of all the six fish species investigated remain encircled by characteristic concentric whorls of epidermal cells. Harvey & Batty (1998), suggested that it was sometimes possible to locate and count taste buds by the presence of the characteristic ring of epidermal cells surrounding the sensory apex, even when the apex itself was damaged or missing.

Earlier SEM studies reported that fish taste buds fall into three categories based on their external surface morphology (Reutter *et al.*, 1974; Ezeasor, 1982). In addition to the three types of taste buds previously described from various teleost fish, a fourth type comprising very small buds, was found in some cardinal fish (Fishelson, 2004)*.* The taste buds in the mouth cavity of *Rita rita* are of three types which are elevated from the epithelium at different levels, which may be useful for ensuring full utilization of the gustatory ability of the fish, detection and analysing of taste substances, as well as for assessing the quality and palatability of food, during its retention in the mouth cavity (Yashpal et al., 2006). In *C. mrigala*, there is only one type of taste buds observed in mouth cavity (Yashpal et al., 2009).In the present study only one type of taste buds are observed in the 5 fish species whereas in *G. giuris* there are two types of taste buds are observed in different regions of lips and associated epithelia.

In *G. giuris*, in addition to the taste buds, specialised sensory structures the superficial neuromasts are also observed in the epithelium of the RC and in the epithelia of the FSLS close to the ventral head skin. Neuromasts can be found on the entire body surface including the tail with the cupulae extending into the water (Schellart & Wubbels, 1998; Eastman & Lannoo, 2003; Tarby and Webb, 2003; Sane et. al., 2009).

The fishes studied are characterised by the peculiar trophic niche they occupy: many scrape epilithic or epiphytic algae and other food items from submerged substrates. This specialized feeding type is possible thanks to the remarkably formed, ventrally placed suckermouth of *G. lamta* that allows itself to attach to a surface while scraping and eating the food attached to it. In spite of this highly specialized feeding apparatus, diversity in both thickness of the different regions of lips and in shape of lips exists, and these fishes actually feed on a broad range of food. As such, Cyprinidae are the most specialized and successful fish family within the order Cypriniformes. More basal families within the teleosts like Gobiidae, Cobitidae and Belontiidae mostly display a more general (non-specialized) feeding mode, with a typical feeding apparatus suitable for finding and processing insects and other food items that abound in the water column or in the bottom. Some knowledge exists on the trophic, evolutionary trend in the group, but detailed studies dealing with the morphology of lips and associated structures or the feeding apparatus are few and often fragmentary.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 175

Hawkes, J. W. (1974). The structure of fish skin. I. General organisation. *Cell Tissue Res.* 149,

Hildemann, W. H. (1962). Immunogenetic studies of poikilothermic animals. *Am. Nat.* 96,

Hora S. L. & Mukerji, D. D. (1953). Table for the identification of Indian fresh water

Hora, S. L. & Pillay, T. V. R. (1962). *Handbook of fish culture in the Indo-Pacific region*. FAO

Hora, S. L. (1922). Structural modifications in the fish of mountain torrents. *Rec. Indian Mus*.

Hughes, G. M. (1979). Scanning electron microscopy of the respiratory surfaces of trout gills.

Hughes, G. M. & Wright, D. E. (1970). A comparative study of the ultrastructure of the

Hunter, C. R. & Nayudu, P. L. (1978). Surface folds in superficial epidermal cells of three

Iger, Y., Abraham, M., Dotan, A., Fattal, B. & Rahamim, E. (1988). Cellular responses in the skin of carp maintained in organically fertilised water. *J. Fish Biol.* 33, 711-720. Kaiser, P. (1962). Hornzahnchen als Lippenbewaffnug bei Jungfischen von Cypriniden. *Zool*

Kapoor, B. G. (1958). The anatomy and histology of the alimentary tract of a planktonfeeder, *Gadusia chapra* (Ham.). *Ann. Mus. Stor. nat.* Geneva. 70, 8-32.

Kapoor, B. G., Smit, H & Verighina, I. A. (1975). The alimentary canal and digestion in

Karlsson, L. (1983). Gill morphology in the zebra fish, Brachydanio *rerio* (Hamilton-

Khanna, S. S. (1961). Alimentary canal in some teleostean fishes. *J. Zool. Soc. India.* 13, 206-219. Khanna, S. S. (1962). A study of bucco-pharyngeal region in some fishes. *Ind. J. Zool*. 3, 21-48.

Kiyohara, S., Yamashita, S. & Kitoh, J. (1980). Distribution of taste buds on the lips and inside the mouth in the minnow, *Pseudorasbora parva*. *Physiol. Behav.* 24, 1143-1147. Kuratani, S. (2003) Evolution of the vertebrate jaw: homology and developmental

Lal, M. B. (1968). Studies on the anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of a carp, *Tor*

Lal, M. B., Bhatnagar, A. N. & Kailc, R. K. (1964). Studies on the morphology and histology

Lal, M. B., Bhatnagar, A. N. & Uniyal, J. P. (1966). Adhesive modifications of a hill stream fish *Glyptothorax pectinopterus* (McClelland). *Proc. natl. Acad. Sci.* India (B) 36, 109-116. Lanzing, W. J. R. & Higginbotham, D. R. (1974). Scanning microscopy of surface structures

Lewis, R. W. (1970). Fish cutaneous mucus: a new source of skin surface lipids. *Lipids* 5, 947-

of the digestive tract and associated structures of *Chagunius chagujnio* (Ham). *Proc.*

Khanna, S. S. (1993). *An introduction to fishes*, Allahabad: Central Book Depot.

constraints. *Paleontological research* 7, 1, 89-102.

*putitora* (Ham). *Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.* India. 38B, 127-136.

of *Tilapia mossambica* (Peters) scales. *J. Fish Biol.* 6, 307-310.

fishes,with description of certain families and observation on the relative utility of the probable larvivorous fishes of India. (Revised by T.J. Job) *Health bulletin* No.12.

Fish. Biol. Tech. Pap. No. 14. Fisheries Division, Biology Branch, Food and

water/blood pathway in the secondary lamellae of teleost and elasmobranch fishes

Harvey, R. & Batty, R. S. (1998). Cutaneous taste buds in cod. *J. Fish Biol.* 53, 138-149.

*Malaria bureau*, No. 4. Simla, Govt of India Press.

Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome.

species of teleost fish. *J. Fish Biol*. 12, 163-166.

147-158.

195-204.

24, 31-61.

*J. Zool. Lond.* 188, 443-453.

*Anz.*, Leipzig 169, 158-161.

teleosts. *Adv. Mar. Biol.* 13, 109-239.

Buchanan). *J. Fish Biol.* 23, 511-524.

*Nat. Acad. Sci. India*. 34B, 160-172.

949.

#### **12. References**

Adams, D. (1976) Keratinization of the oral epithelium. *Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons*

Agrawal, N., Mittal, A. K. (1991) Epithelium of lips and associated structures of the Indian

Agrawal, N., Mittal, A. K. (1992 a) Structural modifications and histochemistry of the

Agrawal, N., Mittal, A. K. (1992 b) Structural organisation and histochemistry of the epithelia of lips and associated structures of a carp – *Cirrhina mrigala. Can. J. Zool.* 70, 71-78. Agrawal, N., Mittal, A. K. (1992 c) Structure and histochemistry of the epithelia of lips and associated structures of a catfish *Rita rita*. *Japan. J. Ichthyol.* 39, 93-102. Alikunhi, K. H. (1957). *Fish culture in India, Farm Bulletin No.* 20. New Delhi: Indian Council

Anson, B. J. (1929) The comparative anatomy of the lips and labial villi of vertebrates. *J*

Avella, M. & Ehrenfeld, J. (1997). Fish gill respiratory cells in culture: A new model for Cl-

Branson, B. A. & Hake, P. (1972). Observation on an accessory breathing mechanism in

Chitray, B. B. (1965). The anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of *Puntius sarana*

Eastman, J. T. and Lannoo, M. J. (2003) Diversification of Brain and Sense Organ

Ezeasor, D. N. (1982). Distribution and ultrastructure of taste buds in the oropharyngeal cavity of the rainbow trout, *Salmo gairdneri* Richardson. *J. Fish Biol.* 20, 53-68. Ferri, S. (1982). Temperature induced transformation of teleost (*Pimelodus maculatus*)

Ferri, S. (1983). Modification of microridge pattern in teleost (*Pimelodus maculatus*) epidermal cells induced by NaCl. *Gegenbaurs Morph. Jahrb.* Leipzig. 129, 325-329. Fishelson, L. (1984). A comparative study of ridge-mazes on surface epithelial cell/membranes of fish scales (Pisces, Teleostei). *Zoomorphologie.* 104, 231-238. Fishelson, L. Delarea, Y. and Zverdling, A. (2004) Taste bud form and distribution on lips

Girgis, S. (1952). On the anatomy and histology of the alimentary tract of an herbivorous bottom-feeding Cyprinoid fish*, Labeo horie* (Cuvier). *J. Morph*. 90, 317-362.

Günther, S. (1989*). Fresh water fishes of the world Vol. I & II* (Translated and revised by Tucker,

Hamilton, F. B. (1822). *An account of fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches*. Edinburg

Harris, J. E. & Hunt, S. (1975). The fine structure of the epidermis of two species of salmonid

fish, the Atlantic salmon (*Salmo salar* L.) and the brown trout (*Salmo trutta* L.). I. General organisation and filament containing cells. *Cell Tissue Res.* 157, -553-565.

(Ham.) with a note on feeding habits. *Ichthyologica* 4, 53-62.

epidermal cells. *Gegenbaurs Morph. Jahrb.* Leipzig. 128, 712-731.

with remarks on their dentition. J. Morph. 259:316–327.

Graham, J. B. (1997). *Air-breathing Fishes*. Academic Press. California, USA.

D. W.), New Delhi: Falcon books, Cosmo Publications.

and London, pp. VIII+405 39 pls.

*Piaractus nigripinnis* (Cope) (Pisces: Teleostomi: Characidae). *Zool. Anz.* Leipzig.

Morphology in Antarctic Dragonfishes (Perciformes: Notothenioidei:

and in the oropharyngeal cavity of cardinal fish species (Apogonidae, Teleostei),

epithelia of lips and associated structures of a carp – *Labeo rohita. Eur. Arch. Biol.*

major carp, *Catla catla. Japan. J. Ichthyol.* 37, 363-373.

**12. References**

*of England* 58, 351-358.

of Agricultural Research.

*Morph. Physiol.* 47, 2, 335-413.

secreting epithelia J. *Membrane Biol.* 156, 8-97. Bloch, M. E. & Schneider, J. G. (1801). *Syst. Ichthyologie*. i-ix, 1-584.

Bathydraconidae). J Morphol 258:130–150.

103, 169-180.

189, 292-297.

Harvey, R. & Batty, R. S. (1998). Cutaneous taste buds in cod. *J. Fish Biol.* 53, 138-149.

Diversity of Lips and Associated Structures in Fishes by SEM 177

Pinky, Mittal S, Yashpal M, Ojha J, Mittal AK. 2004. Occurrence of keratinization in the

Pinky, Mittal S, Mittal AK. 2008. Glycoproteins in the epithelium of lips and associated

Reutter, K., Breipohl, W. & Bijvank, G. J. (1974). Taste bud types in fishes. II Scanning

Roberts, T. R. (1982). Unculi (Horny projections arising from single cells), an adaptive feature of the epidermis of Ostariophysan fishes. *Zoologica Scripta*. 11, 55-76. Sane, S. P. and McHenry, M. J. (2009) The biomechanics of sensory organs. *Integrative and*

Saxena, D. B. & Bakshi, P. L. (1964). Functional anatomy of the alimentary canal of a

Saxena, S. C. & Chandy, M. (1966). Adhesive apparatus in certain Indian hill stream fishes. *J.*

Saxena, S. C. (1959). Adhesive apparatus of a hill stream cyprinid fish *Garra mullya* (Sykes).

Schellart, N. A. M. & Wubbels, R. J. (1998). The auditory and mechanosensory lateral line system. In *The physiology of fishes.* (Evans, D. H. ed.) pp. 283-312. New York: CRC Press. Schemmel, C. (1967). Vergleichende Untersuchungen an den Hautsinnesorganen ober-und unterirdisch lebeder Astyanax-Formen. *Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere* 61, 253-316. Schwerdtfeger, W. K. (1979 a). Morphometrical studies of the ultrastructure of the epidermis

Schwerdtfeger, W. K. (1979 b). Qualitative and quantitative data on the fine structure of the

Sehgal, P. (1966). Anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of *Labeo calbasu* (Ham). *Res.*

Sehgal, P. & Salaria J. (1970). Functional anatomy of histology of the digestive organs a *Cirrhina mrigala* (Cuvie and Val.) *Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. India.* 40B, 212-222. Sibbing, F. A. & Uribe, R. (1985). Regional specialisations in the oropharyngeal wall and food processing in the carp (*Cyprinus carpio* L.). *Neth. J. Zool.* 35, 377-422. Sinha, G. M. (1975). On the origin development and probable function of taste buds in the

Sinha, G. M. & Moitra, S. K. (1975). Functional morpho-histology of the alimentary canal of

Sinha, G. M. & Moitra, S. K. (1976). Studies on the morpho-histology of the alimentary canal

of the guppy, *Poecilia reticulata* Peters, following adaptation to sea-water and

guppy (*Poecilia reticulata* Peters) epidermis following treatment with thyroxine and

lip and bucco-pharyngeal epithelia of an Indian freshwater major carp, *Cirrhinus mrigala* (Hamilton) in relation to food and feeding habits. *Z. mikrosk -anat Forsch*,

an Indian fresh water major carp *Labeo rohita* (Hamilton) during its different life

of fresh water fishes of India. Part I. The alimentary canal of young *Cirrhinus reba* (Ham.) with a comparison with that of the adult in relation to food. *Vest. Cs. Spol.*

torrential stream fish *Botia birdi* (Choudhari). *Kashmir sci.* 1, 76-86.

treatment with prolactin. *Gen.Comp. Endocrinol.* 38, 476-483.

(Cyprinidae. Cypriniformes). *J Fish Biol.* 65, 1165–1172.

histochemical investigation. *Anat Histol Embryol* 37,101–113. Rauther, M. (1911). Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Panzerwelse. *Zool. Jb. Anat.* 31, 497-528.

Rauther, M. (1928). Der Saugmund von *Discognathus. Zool. Jb. Anat.* 45, 45-76.

Cyprinodontiformes, Teleostei). *Cell Tissue Res.* 153, 151-165.

*Comparative Biology* 1–16.

*Proc. Natn. Inst. Sci. India.* 25, 205-214.

testosterone. *Gen. comp. Endocr.* 38, 484-490.

*Bull. Punjab Univ. Sci.* 17, 257-266.

history stages. *Anat. Anz.* 138, 222-239.

Leipzig. 82, 294-304.

*Zool.* 40, 221-231.

*Zool.* 148, 315-340.

structures associated with lips of a hill stream fish *Garra lamta* (Hamilton)

structures of a hill stream fish *Garra lamta* (Cyprinidae. Cypriniformes): A

electron microscopical investigations on *Xiphophorus helleri* Heckel (Poeciliidae,

Leydig, F. (1895). Integument und Hautsinnesorgane der Knochenfishc. *Zool. Jb. Anat.* 8, 1-

Liguori, V. R., Ruggieri, G. D., Baslow, S. J. M. H., Stempien, M. F. & Nigrelli, R. F. (1963).

Linnaeus, C. (1758). *Systema Naturae*. 10th edn. Vol. 1. Regnum Animale. Stockholm: Salvius. (Facsimile reprint (1956). London: British Museum (Natural History).) Merrilees, M. J. (1974). Epidermal fine structure of the teleost *Esox americanus* (Esocidae,

Mester, L. (1971). Studiul cavitatii buco-faringiene, La *Noemacheilus barbatulus* L. (Pisces,

Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (1981). Fish tongues - surface fine structures and ecological

Miller, R. J. & Evans, H. E. (1965). External morphology of the brain and lips in Catostmid

Mittal, A. K. & Agrawal, N. (1994). Modifications in the epithelia of lips and associated structures of the predatory murrel (*Channa striata*). *J. Appl. Ichthyol.* 10, 114-122. Mittal, A. K. & Whitear, M. (1978). A note on cold anaesthesia of poikilotherms. *J. Fish Biol.*

Moitra, S. K. & Bhowmik, M. L. (1967). Functional histology of the alimentary canal of the

Moitra, S. K. & Sinha, G. M. (1971). Studies on the morphohistology of the alimentary canal

Nigrelli, R. F. (1937). Further studies on the susceptibility and acquired immunity of marine fishes to *Epibdella melleni*, a monogenetic trematode. *Zoologica, N.Y.* 22, 185-192. Nigrelli, R. F., Jakowska, S. & Padnos, M. (1955). Pathogenicity of epibionts in fishes. *J.*

Nikolsky, G.V. (1963). *The Ecology of Fishes*. (Translated by L. Birkett). Academic Press,

Ojha, J. & Singh, S. K. (1992). Functional morphology of the anchorage system and food

Ono, D. R. (1980). Fine structure and distribution of epidermal projections associated with

Pasha, S. M. K. (1964 a). The anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of an

Pasha, S. M. K. (1964 b). Anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of a herbivorous

Pasha, S. M. K. (1964 c). The anatomy and histology of the alimentary canal of a carnivorous

Pereira, J. J. (1988). Morphological effects of mercury exposure on windowpane flounder gills as observed by scanning electron microscopy. *J. Fish Biol.* 33, 571-580. Pinky, Mittal, S., Ojha, J. Mittal, A. K., 2002. Scanning electron microscopic study of the

omnivorous fish, *Mystus gulio. Proc. Ind. Acad. sci*. 59B, 211-221.

fish, Tilapia *mosambica*. *Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.* 59B, 340-349.

fish, *Megalops cyprinoides*. *Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci.* 60B, 107-115.

Cyriniformes) *European Journal of Morphology* 40, 161-169.

young *Catla catla* (Ham.), an omnivorous surface-feeding fish of Indian fresh-

of a carp, *Chagunius chagunio* (Ham.) with reference to the nature of taste buds and

scrapers of a hill stream fish, *Garra lamta* (Ham.) (Cyprinidae, Cypriniformes). *J.*

taste buds on the oral papillae in some Loricariid catfishes (Siluroidei:

structures associated with lips of an Indian hill stream fish *Garra lamta* (Cyrinidae,

Cobitidae). *St. si. cerc. Biol. seria Zoologie Bucuresti*. 23, 439-444.

Minzenmay, A. (1933). Die Mundregion der Cypriniden. *Zool. Jb. Anat.* 57, 191-286.

*Grammistes sexlineatus*. *Am. Zool.* 3, 546.

Salmoniformes). *J. Ultrastruct. Res.* 47, 272-283.

considerations*. Zoo. J. Linn. Soc.* 71, 413-426.

waters. *Vestnik Cs. spol. Zool.* 31, 41-50.

mucous cells. *Inland Fish.Soc India.* 3, 44-56.

fishes. *Copeia.* 4, 467-487.

*Protozool.* 2 (suppl.) 7.

*Fish Biol.* 41, 159-161.

Loricariidae). *J. Morph.* 164, 139-159.

London and New York.

13, 519-520.

Antibiotic and toxic activity of the mucus of the pacific golden striped bass

152.

**10**

**SEM Evaluation**

*Ege University, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics,*

Bülent Gökçe

*Turkey*

**Effects of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on**

**Dental Hard Tissues and All-Ceramic Materials:**

A reliable bond to dental hard tissues and materials has always been one of the most significant contributions for restorative dentistry (Leinfelder, 2001). A durable and stable bond between resins and dental hard tissues and restorative materials which has to integrate all parts of the system into one coherent structure is fundamental for the long-term retention and clinical success of the restorations. However, micromechanical attachment is one of the key mechanisms for a reliable adhesion to dental hard tissues and restorative materials (Matinlinna & Vallitu, 2007; Van Noort, 2002b; Fabienelli, et al., 2010). Advances in adhesive dentistry have resulted in the recent introduction of modern surface conditioning methods in order to achieve high bond strengths through increased surface roughness of both dental hard tissues and the restorative materials (Matinlinna & Vallitu, 2007; Van

The use lasers in dentistry has evolved since their development in 1962. Researches have been carried out on effects of lasers on dental hard tissues and materials and applications of different wavelengths as they become available (Roberts-Harry, 1992; Convissar & Goldstein, 2001; White, et al., 1993; Frentzen, et al., 1992; Arima & Matsumoto, 1993; Wilder-Smith, et al., 1997; Cernavin, 1995; Keller & Hibst, 1989; Burkes, et al., 1992; Wigdor, et al., 1993; Visuri, et al., 1996b). According to current literature there is no optimum wavelength for all dental applications. Each wavelength has distinct treatment advantages and offers various treatment options. Understanding the differences between laser wavelengths will help to choose the adequate wavelength for each application in the dental office (Kutsch, 1993).

Laser light has properties such as being coherent, monochromatic and collimated. Laser light travels in specific wavelengths in a predictable pattern (coherent) and parallel (collimated) and it has one color (monochromatic). Lasers and target tissues interact in four ways. When a laser light hits the target it can be reflected, absorbed, scattered throughout the target or transmitted into the target (Kutsch, 1993). During laser application light energy is converted into heat and energy absorption on the target surface causes the vaporization. This process is called ablation or photoablation by vaporization (Cardoso, et al., 2008; Esteves–Oliveira, et al., 2007; Tachibana, et al., 2008; Lee, et al., 2007). Among currently available lasers, the erbium:yttrium-

**1. Introduction**

Noort, 2002b).

## **Effects of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation on Dental Hard Tissues and All-Ceramic Materials: SEM Evaluation**

Bülent Gökçe *Ege University, School of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, Turkey*

## **1. Introduction**

178 Scanning Electron Microscopy

Sinha, G. M. & Moitra, S. K. (1978). Studies on the comparative histology of the taste buds in

Suzuki, N. (1992). Fine structure of the epidermis of the mudskipper, *Periophthalmus*

Suzuki, Y. (1956). A histological study of the granular processes on the lips of scythe fish

Tarby ML, Webb JF. 2003. Development of the supraorbital and mandibular lateral line canals in the cichlid, *Archocentrus nigrofasciatus*. J Morphol 255, 44–57. Thys (van den Audenaerde ), D. F. E. (1961). L' anatomie de phractolaemus ansorgei Blgr et

Tillmann, B., Pietzsch-Rohrschneider, I. & Huenges H. L. (1977). The human vocal cord

Tripathi, P. and Mittal A. K. (2010) Essence of Keratin in Lips and Associated Structures of a

Verighina, I. A. (1971). The structure of the digestive tract of the Volga under mouth

Welcomme, R.L. (1988). *International introductions of inland aquatic species*. FAO fisheries

Whitear, M. (1990). Causative aspects of microridges on the surface of fish epithelia. *J.*