A rabbit model of pneumococcal sepsis was developed in 1970. It encompasses several aspects of clinical sepsis including increased cardiac output and body temperature (40;41). This model involves the use of *Diplococcus pneumoniae* to induce sepsis and an inoculum of 1 ml of medium containing rabbit blood and tryptase soy broth with 108 to109 colony forming units is administered intraperitoneally (40) Several other rabbit models of sepsis were developed to study lung injury. Matute Bello et al. observed that a dose of 109 cfu/clot induced a more persistent infection compared to 108 cfu/clot, while inoculation of 1010 cfu/clot had lethal effects in a rabbit model of peritonitis (42). In this model, polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMNs) function in the peritoneal cavity was perturbed suggesting potential contribution in the development of septic shock (42). Overall, the rabbit model of sepsis has been used to investigate physiological and immunological responses

The canine models of endotoxemia and bacteremia have been used extensively to study cardiovascular function during sepsis. Dogs subjected to septic shock, show responses that parallel human sepsis. For example, there is a severe but reversible decrease in systolic ventricular function (44), a 32-108% increase in cardiac output, decrease in mean arterial pressure, and leukocytosis as well as increase in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine levels during septic shock (45). Cytokine profiles in the canine model of endotoxemia also mirror those reported in human sepsis patients with a 62 fold increase in IL-6 mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and 4.5 fold increase in TNFα within the first

Despite the analogous physiological responses, there are several limitations of this model pertaining to clinical relevance. Canines have an adrenergic sensitive sphincter around the hepatic vein which constricts during sepsis increasing intestinal venous pressure and damaging the mucosal barrier, increasing its relevance to a gut injury model (47;48). Another important limitation is the resistance of canines to endotoxins and the requirement of high LPS dosage to induce sepsis (39;49). This requirement for increased endotoxemia results in a severe hypodynamic response in canines (50) which does not mimic

Pigs are popular animals for since they are readily available and relatively easy to handle. Continuous infusion of live bacteria, endotoxins as well as CLP are some of the methods used to induce sepsis in pigs. Porcine models of sepsis have been used extensively to investigate therapeutic agents focusing on improving renal, hepatic, intestinal and cardiovascular function (51-53). For instance, using a porcine model of LPS induced shock, Cohen et al. observed that increasing levels of nitric oxide (NO) improves renal blood flow

**4.1. Rabbit models of sepsis**

In sheep, infusion of endotoxins (58), live bacteria as well as administration of fecal content into the abdominal cavity are some methods used to induce sepsis. The ovine model of sepsis has distinct similarities to human sepsis and several advantages over other animal models specifically regarding cardiopulmonary responses. One similarity between sheep and human sepsis is the biphasic cardiovascular profile. In endotoxemia models of ovine sepsis, two phases of cardiopulmonary function are observed (59). Within the first hour, the animal is in a hypodynamic state with a low cardiac index, myocardial contractility, high mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance (59). The first phase is followed by a hyperdynamic state with significant increase in cardiac output (59).

The ovine is also a popular specie to study sepsis associated with lung injury. Daniel Traber is a pioneer in developing the ovine model of 'smoke injury' which involves insufflating sheep with smoke from burning cotton cloth (60) and the 'ovine burn model' which involves third degree burns and smoke injury (61). Smoke inhalation is induced using a modified bee smoker filled with 40 g of burning cotton cloth attached to a tracheostomy tube through a modified endotracheal tube (61). Based on similar principles, the ovine model of 'smoke inhalation and septic shock' was developed to study sepsis associated with pneumonia that develops due to acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) after smoke inhalation (62). In this model, the aforementioned technique of 'smoke inhalation' is used to induce lung injury (63), followed by instilling bacteria such as *Pseudomonas aeruginosa* into the lungs (63;64).

#### 44 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

Using the 'ovine smoke inhalation and septic shock' model several therapeutic agents have been investigated for sepsis management. Necrosis and apoptosis in this model were improved by administration of WW-85, a peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst. Other notable changes include improved gas exchange, decreased levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lung 3-nitrotyrosine (65). There was also an overall improvement in pulmonary function suggesting that blocking nitric oxide-peroxynitrite pathway may ameliorate some effects of septic shock (65).The ovine model of sepsis and septic shock has made important contributions in the areas of cardiovascular (66) and pulmonary research as well as in determining the efficacy of fluids (58) and therapeutic agents (67), such as anticoagulants (68) and recombinant human protein C (69) to improve sepsis outcomes.

Experimental Sepsis Models 45

Clinical studies report that individuals with co-morbidities such as diabetes are at a higher risk of mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases (74-77). It has also been estimated that greater than 50% of septic patients have at least one additional co-morbid condition (78). Therefore, incorporating co-morbid conditions into animal models is one method by

Several animal studies and clinical trials have demonstrated that diabetes increases the risk of infections and mortality (74-77). A retrospective cohort study from Ontario, Canada by Shah et al. reported that almost half of the diabetic patients in their study (n=513,749) had a minimum of one case of infectious disease for which they were either hospitalized or received a physician claim (74). It was also found that bacterial infections and infections in general were also more commonly found in diabetics (74). From animal models of type II diabetes it is known that sepsis induced inflammation is more severe in diabetic animals (79). Septic diabetic animals also have increased bacteria load (80;81), altered levels of cytokine expression

(81;82) and dysfunctional immune cells such as PMNs contributing to poor outcomes.

cells to infections such as sepsis and thus have direct impact on sepsis outcomes.

common clinical infections will increase the relevance of these animal studies.

Studies in animal models of obesity parallel the findings in diabetic animals. Strandberg et al. reported that mice fed a high fat diet (HFD) with saturated fats, had higher mortality rates when challenged with *Staphylococcus aureus* compared to mice fed a low fat diet (LFD) (83). The HFD fed group had increased bacterial load, decreased immune cell-mediated clearance of bacteria, and significantly elevated pro and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels compared to mice on a LFD (83). Therefore obesity can influence the response of immune

The urogenital tract is the focus of infection in approximately 25% of all sepsis cases (84). Urinary tract infection (UTI) associated sepsis is predominantly found in elderly individuals, diabetics and immuno-suppressed patients (85). Several animal models have been developed to study different aspects of these co-morbid conditions. Harberg et al. developed a model of *E.coli* induced UTI by infecting urinary bladders of female mice by administrating bacteria via a urethral catheter (86). Pyelonephritis isolates (HU734) and normal fecal (414) *E. coli* were used to induce infection, where the pyelonephritis strains were discovered to remain in the system longer (86). UTI associated sepsis animal models have also been used to test potential therapeutic strategies. Reid et al. investigated whether competitive exclusion of uropathogenic bacteria would occur when animals were treated with indigenous bacteria (87). In female rats with chronic UTI induced by periurethral injections of agar beads with bacteria, rats exposed to indigenous bacteria , *Lactobacillus casei*, 21 days before the uropathogen challenge, had no pathogenic bacteria or immune responses in the bladder and kidney for up to 60 days (87). Given the prevalence of UTi-associated sepsis in the clinical setting, using animal models which involve co-morbidities and

which modeling clinical sepsis in animal models could be improved.

**5.1. Sepsis and diabetes**

**5.2. Urinary tract infection and sepsis**

## **4.5. Non-human primate models of sepsis**

Due to genetic similarities to humans, non-human primates are an ideal model for testing species-specific therapies (70). The method of inducing sepsis and septic shock in baboons utilizes an intravenous infusion of live *E.coli* (70). Using the baboon model of sepsis, several therapeutic discoveries have been made, the most prominent one being Activated Protein C (APC) (71;72). Taylor et al. reported that co-administration of APC with E. coli at lethal doses reduces coagulopathic and hepatotoxic effects induced by E. coli. This blocking of lethal effects of *E.coli* disappeared when protein C activation was blocked *in vivo* (73). More recently Xu et al. also reported that histone levels increase following *E.coli* administration in baboons. Extracellular histones released in response to inflammatory stimuli and during sepsis contributes to endothelial dysfunction, organ failure and death (71). Xu et al. discovered that baboons co-administered with both APC and *E.coli*, were rescued from mortality (71). The success of APC in baboon model of sepsis, allowed for its use in the clinical setting, until its recent withdrawal from the market following a further phase III trial. Despite the advantages associated with baboon models of sepsis, risk of infectious disease transmission, high housing and maintenance costs, as well as the ethical concerns deter many investigators from utilizing these animals for sepsis research (49).

## **4.6. Limitations of large animal models of sepsis**

Large animal models have provided tremendous insight into the pathophysiology of sepsis, however there are certain limitations to the use of these animals. Due to their large size, they are also more difficult to handle, house, and anaesthetize and in the case of primates, pose risks of cross transmissible diseases (47).

## **5. Co-morbidities and sepsis**

There have been several therapeutic agents with positive outcomes in animal models however majority failed to show efficacy in clinical settings. This disconnect is partially due to discrepancies in translating findings from animal models to clinical sepsis. Defined human target populations and established severities of sepsis would allow for more realistic and applicable animal modelling.

Clinical studies report that individuals with co-morbidities such as diabetes are at a higher risk of mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases (74-77). It has also been estimated that greater than 50% of septic patients have at least one additional co-morbid condition (78). Therefore, incorporating co-morbid conditions into animal models is one method by which modeling clinical sepsis in animal models could be improved.

## **5.1. Sepsis and diabetes**

44 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

Using the 'ovine smoke inhalation and septic shock' model several therapeutic agents have been investigated for sepsis management. Necrosis and apoptosis in this model were improved by administration of WW-85, a peroxynitrite decomposition catalyst. Other notable changes include improved gas exchange, decreased levels of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and lung 3-nitrotyrosine (65). There was also an overall improvement in pulmonary function suggesting that blocking nitric oxide-peroxynitrite pathway may ameliorate some effects of septic shock (65).The ovine model of sepsis and septic shock has made important contributions in the areas of cardiovascular (66) and pulmonary research as well as in determining the efficacy of fluids (58) and therapeutic agents (67), such as anticoagulants

Due to genetic similarities to humans, non-human primates are an ideal model for testing species-specific therapies (70). The method of inducing sepsis and septic shock in baboons utilizes an intravenous infusion of live *E.coli* (70). Using the baboon model of sepsis, several therapeutic discoveries have been made, the most prominent one being Activated Protein C (APC) (71;72). Taylor et al. reported that co-administration of APC with E. coli at lethal doses reduces coagulopathic and hepatotoxic effects induced by E. coli. This blocking of lethal effects of *E.coli* disappeared when protein C activation was blocked *in vivo* (73). More recently Xu et al. also reported that histone levels increase following *E.coli* administration in baboons. Extracellular histones released in response to inflammatory stimuli and during sepsis contributes to endothelial dysfunction, organ failure and death (71). Xu et al. discovered that baboons co-administered with both APC and *E.coli*, were rescued from mortality (71). The success of APC in baboon model of sepsis, allowed for its use in the clinical setting, until its recent withdrawal from the market following a further phase III trial. Despite the advantages associated with baboon models of sepsis, risk of infectious disease transmission, high housing and maintenance costs, as well as the ethical concerns

(68) and recombinant human protein C (69) to improve sepsis outcomes.

deter many investigators from utilizing these animals for sepsis research (49).

Large animal models have provided tremendous insight into the pathophysiology of sepsis, however there are certain limitations to the use of these animals. Due to their large size, they are also more difficult to handle, house, and anaesthetize and in the case of primates, pose

There have been several therapeutic agents with positive outcomes in animal models however majority failed to show efficacy in clinical settings. This disconnect is partially due to discrepancies in translating findings from animal models to clinical sepsis. Defined human target populations and established severities of sepsis would allow for more realistic

**4.6. Limitations of large animal models of sepsis**

risks of cross transmissible diseases (47).

**5. Co-morbidities and sepsis**

and applicable animal modelling.

**4.5. Non-human primate models of sepsis**

Several animal studies and clinical trials have demonstrated that diabetes increases the risk of infections and mortality (74-77). A retrospective cohort study from Ontario, Canada by Shah et al. reported that almost half of the diabetic patients in their study (n=513,749) had a minimum of one case of infectious disease for which they were either hospitalized or received a physician claim (74). It was also found that bacterial infections and infections in general were also more commonly found in diabetics (74). From animal models of type II diabetes it is known that sepsis induced inflammation is more severe in diabetic animals (79). Septic diabetic animals also have increased bacteria load (80;81), altered levels of cytokine expression (81;82) and dysfunctional immune cells such as PMNs contributing to poor outcomes.

Studies in animal models of obesity parallel the findings in diabetic animals. Strandberg et al. reported that mice fed a high fat diet (HFD) with saturated fats, had higher mortality rates when challenged with *Staphylococcus aureus* compared to mice fed a low fat diet (LFD) (83). The HFD fed group had increased bacterial load, decreased immune cell-mediated clearance of bacteria, and significantly elevated pro and anti-inflammatory cytokine levels compared to mice on a LFD (83). Therefore obesity can influence the response of immune cells to infections such as sepsis and thus have direct impact on sepsis outcomes.

## **5.2. Urinary tract infection and sepsis**

The urogenital tract is the focus of infection in approximately 25% of all sepsis cases (84). Urinary tract infection (UTI) associated sepsis is predominantly found in elderly individuals, diabetics and immuno-suppressed patients (85). Several animal models have been developed to study different aspects of these co-morbid conditions. Harberg et al. developed a model of *E.coli* induced UTI by infecting urinary bladders of female mice by administrating bacteria via a urethral catheter (86). Pyelonephritis isolates (HU734) and normal fecal (414) *E. coli* were used to induce infection, where the pyelonephritis strains were discovered to remain in the system longer (86). UTI associated sepsis animal models have also been used to test potential therapeutic strategies. Reid et al. investigated whether competitive exclusion of uropathogenic bacteria would occur when animals were treated with indigenous bacteria (87). In female rats with chronic UTI induced by periurethral injections of agar beads with bacteria, rats exposed to indigenous bacteria , *Lactobacillus casei*, 21 days before the uropathogen challenge, had no pathogenic bacteria or immune responses in the bladder and kidney for up to 60 days (87). Given the prevalence of UTi-associated sepsis in the clinical setting, using animal models which involve co-morbidities and common clinical infections will increase the relevance of these animal studies.

## **5.3. Genetics and sepsis**

Several studies have identified the implications of genetic variance, for immune responses to sepsis. Even while comparing across different strains of septic mice, mortality rates, liver MPO activity, metallothione mRNA, leptin as well as IL-10 levels are significantly higher in C57BL/6J compared to A/J mice (88). Thus, genetic differences in mice and possibly humans are associated with differences in the inflammatory processes initiated in response to infection that ultimately affects sepsis outcomes (88).

Experimental Sepsis Models 47

greater organ dysfunction and increased mortality rates during sepsis (99). Leptin signaling appears to improve survival and may be required for immune responses, implicating therapeutic potential for leptin analogues for sepsis. Thus transgenic mice have made important contributions to Improve our understanding of sepsis at physiological,

**6. Emerging preclinical research in sepsis: Neutrophil Extracellular Trap**

An emerging area of sepsis research involves the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. In 2004, Brinkmann et al. characterized a novel mechanism of innate immunity exhibited by neutrophils. Upon stimulation by endotoxins or pro-inflammatory mediators, activated neutrophils released chromatin material composed of a DNA backbone and antimicrobial granular proteins in the form of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (100). NETs ensnare circulating microorganisms, preventing further dissemination of pathogens in the vasculature while providing a scaffold for neutrophil granular proteins. This creates a high, local concentration of proteins with antimicrobial properties (100) and allows for microbicidal synergy, concentrating their ability to disarm and kill microorganisms (101).

The formation of NETs, recently coined NETosis (100;102) is an active process. Cleavage of histones by neutrophil elastase is sufficient to cause decondensation of nuclear material (103) which can be observed before disintegration of nuclear and granule membranes. Chromatin material mixes with nuclear and granular proteins with potent antimicrobial properties and is released extracellularly (102;104) forming stretches of DNA and globular proteins with diameters of 15-17 nm and 25 nm respectively which can aggregate to form thicker threads around 50 nm in diameter (100). The process of NETosis is distinct from that of necrosis (the plasma membrane remains intact while nuclear and cytoplasmic granular components mix) and that of apoptosis (no phosphatidylserine exposure signaling

NETosis can be experimentally induced by exposure to endotoxins (e.g. LPS), gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi, pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. IL-8, phorbol myristate acetate or PMA a protein kinase activator), and activated platelets (103;106-111). NET formation in experimental conditions results in the release of proteins which degrade virulence factors expressed on the pathogen surface and create a toxic environment for invading microorganisms (102;107;112-115). NET-associated azurophilic granule proteins which have antimicrobial or immunomodulating effects include histones with specific posttranslational modifications (and histone cleavage products like buforin), cathepsin G, elastase, MPO, pentraxin, gelatinase (matrix metalloproteinase-9), catalase, lactoferrin, peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), and bactericidal permeability-increasing protein (BPI) (100;107;116).

**(NET) formation**

**6.1. NETosis**

Transgenic animal models have also been utilized extensively in sepsis research (89). Transgenic apolipoprotein (ApoE) polymorphs, ApoE3TR and ApoE4TR, generated by replacing mouse ApoE allele with its human counterpart coding sequences were used to investigate if ApoE genotype affects sepsis outcomes (89). ApoE is a ligand for low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, responsible for clearance of VLDLs and chylomicrons residues. ApoE plays key role in lipid metabolism (90) and mediates removal of inflammatory apoptotic substances (91). Mice with the human APOE4 allele have greater inflammatory response (with two to four fold increase in synthesis of cytokine) as well increased time to mortality (89).

ApoE knockout mice (apoE -/-) generated by gene targeting are more susceptible to endotoxemia and K. *pneumoniae* compared to LDLr-/- mice implicating the role of apoE in modulating LPS induced inflammatory responses (92). Haraguchi et al. have reported using the ApoE-/- strain that administration of pioglitazone suppresses inflammation and improves survival in these mice, providing support for the use of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist as potential treatment option for severe sepsis (93).

Other strains of transgenic mice have also been utilized for sepsis research such as mice with inactivated beta2 integrin CD11b. These transgenic mice are partially protected against micro-vessel permeability and edema formation, suggesting key role of Cd11b in lung PMN sequestration and vascular injury during the early phase of gram-negative sepsis (94). Lectin-like oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor 1 knockout (LOX-1-/-) mice have been used to investigate the role of LOX-1 in sepsis induced mortality. Wu et al. reported that LOX-1-/- mice with CLP-induced sepsis had decreased systemic inflammation, neutrophil migration to sites of infection, levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lung edema as well as increased bacterial clearance implicating the key role of LOX-1 in systemic inflammation (95). Important findings have also been discovered in toll like receptor knockout mice (TLR- /-) . Toll like receptors (TLRs) recognize different components of bacteria cell wall and mediate immune responses to infection. TLR-4 for instance interacts with LPS, activating the expression of target genes. TLR-/- knockout mice have been utilized to study dendrititc cell maturation and cytokine production (96), infections of the urogenital organs (97) and defense against infections such as murine tuberculosis (98) among several others aspects of adaptive and immune responses.

Transgenic mice such as ob/ob have also been used to examine the effects of leptin deficiency on sepsis outcomes (99). Leptin deficiency, in ob/ob mice, is associated with greater organ dysfunction and increased mortality rates during sepsis (99). Leptin signaling appears to improve survival and may be required for immune responses, implicating therapeutic potential for leptin analogues for sepsis. Thus transgenic mice have made important contributions to Improve our understanding of sepsis at physiological, immunological and cellular levels.

## **6. Emerging preclinical research in sepsis: Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation**

An emerging area of sepsis research involves the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. In 2004, Brinkmann et al. characterized a novel mechanism of innate immunity exhibited by neutrophils. Upon stimulation by endotoxins or pro-inflammatory mediators, activated neutrophils released chromatin material composed of a DNA backbone and antimicrobial granular proteins in the form of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) (100). NETs ensnare circulating microorganisms, preventing further dissemination of pathogens in the vasculature while providing a scaffold for neutrophil granular proteins. This creates a high, local concentration of proteins with antimicrobial properties (100) and allows for microbicidal synergy, concentrating their ability to disarm and kill microorganisms (101).

## **6.1. NETosis**

46 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

infection that ultimately affects sepsis outcomes (88).

Several studies have identified the implications of genetic variance, for immune responses to sepsis. Even while comparing across different strains of septic mice, mortality rates, liver MPO activity, metallothione mRNA, leptin as well as IL-10 levels are significantly higher in C57BL/6J compared to A/J mice (88). Thus, genetic differences in mice and possibly humans are associated with differences in the inflammatory processes initiated in response to

Transgenic animal models have also been utilized extensively in sepsis research (89). Transgenic apolipoprotein (ApoE) polymorphs, ApoE3TR and ApoE4TR, generated by replacing mouse ApoE allele with its human counterpart coding sequences were used to investigate if ApoE genotype affects sepsis outcomes (89). ApoE is a ligand for low density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor, responsible for clearance of VLDLs and chylomicrons residues. ApoE plays key role in lipid metabolism (90) and mediates removal of inflammatory apoptotic substances (91). Mice with the human APOE4 allele have greater inflammatory response (with two to four fold increase in synthesis of cytokine) as well increased time to

ApoE knockout mice (apoE -/-) generated by gene targeting are more susceptible to endotoxemia and K. *pneumoniae* compared to LDLr-/- mice implicating the role of apoE in modulating LPS induced inflammatory responses (92). Haraguchi et al. have reported using the ApoE-/- strain that administration of pioglitazone suppresses inflammation and improves survival in these mice, providing support for the use of peroxisome proliferator-activated

Other strains of transgenic mice have also been utilized for sepsis research such as mice with inactivated beta2 integrin CD11b. These transgenic mice are partially protected against micro-vessel permeability and edema formation, suggesting key role of Cd11b in lung PMN sequestration and vascular injury during the early phase of gram-negative sepsis (94). Lectin-like oxidized low density lipoprotein receptor 1 knockout (LOX-1-/-) mice have been used to investigate the role of LOX-1 in sepsis induced mortality. Wu et al. reported that LOX-1-/- mice with CLP-induced sepsis had decreased systemic inflammation, neutrophil migration to sites of infection, levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and lung edema as well as increased bacterial clearance implicating the key role of LOX-1 in systemic inflammation (95). Important findings have also been discovered in toll like receptor knockout mice (TLR- /-) . Toll like receptors (TLRs) recognize different components of bacteria cell wall and mediate immune responses to infection. TLR-4 for instance interacts with LPS, activating the expression of target genes. TLR-/- knockout mice have been utilized to study dendrititc cell maturation and cytokine production (96), infections of the urogenital organs (97) and defense against infections such as murine tuberculosis (98) among several others aspects of

Transgenic mice such as ob/ob have also been used to examine the effects of leptin deficiency on sepsis outcomes (99). Leptin deficiency, in ob/ob mice, is associated with

receptor gamma (PPAR-γ) agonist as potential treatment option for severe sepsis (93).

**5.3. Genetics and sepsis**

mortality (89).

adaptive and immune responses.

The formation of NETs, recently coined NETosis (100;102) is an active process. Cleavage of histones by neutrophil elastase is sufficient to cause decondensation of nuclear material (103) which can be observed before disintegration of nuclear and granule membranes. Chromatin material mixes with nuclear and granular proteins with potent antimicrobial properties and is released extracellularly (102;104) forming stretches of DNA and globular proteins with diameters of 15-17 nm and 25 nm respectively which can aggregate to form thicker threads around 50 nm in diameter (100). The process of NETosis is distinct from that of necrosis (the plasma membrane remains intact while nuclear and cytoplasmic granular components mix) and that of apoptosis (no phosphatidylserine exposure signaling phagocytosis, or nucleosomal cleavage) (102;105).

NETosis can be experimentally induced by exposure to endotoxins (e.g. LPS), gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, fungi, pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g. IL-8, phorbol myristate acetate or PMA a protein kinase activator), and activated platelets (103;106-111). NET formation in experimental conditions results in the release of proteins which degrade virulence factors expressed on the pathogen surface and create a toxic environment for invading microorganisms (102;107;112-115). NET-associated azurophilic granule proteins which have antimicrobial or immunomodulating effects include histones with specific posttranslational modifications (and histone cleavage products like buforin), cathepsin G, elastase, MPO, pentraxin, gelatinase (matrix metalloproteinase-9), catalase, lactoferrin, peptidoglycan recognition proteins (PGRPs), and bactericidal permeability-increasing protein (BPI) (100;107;116).

Experimental Sepsis Models 49

rich thrombus formation and decreased plasma clotting times (125). Antimicrobial

phosphatidylserine exposure, and FV activation (127).

inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-8, and TNFα (132).

whether this is associated with organ dysfunction or mortality.

**7. Translation of preclinical studies to clinical outcomes**

proteins associated with NETs also exert pro-coagulant effects which are pathogenic to the host. Positively-charged histones promote red blood cell accumulation and platelet aggregation by electrostatic interactions with the negatively-charged cells (126). NETassociated histones also impair the natural anticoagulant protein C, activate platelets, and induce thrombin generation via platelet TLR2 and TLR4-mediated mechanisms (124;127- 129). Additionally, histones induce prothrombinase activity, increased P-selectin expression,

NETs and NET-associated proteins have also been found to exert pro-inflammatory effects. MPO released during NET formation binds the negatively-charged, proteoglycan-rich endothelium, inducing endothelial cell damage and vascular permeability (130;131). Incubation of NETs with human platelets and THP-1 cells resulted in the release of pro-

The pathogenic nature of NETs is also supported by studies showing improved outcome associated with NET destruction via DNase administration (133). Furthermore, DNaseIdeficient mice develop lupus-like symptoms induced by NET formation, indicating that NET removal is likely a crucial process in the proper immune response (123). The formation of NETs and release of NET-associated proteins (e.g. histones) potentiate the proinflammatory and pro-coagulant response, both of which contribute to end organ morphology in sepsis. These changes include neutrophil adherence to microvascular endothelium, inflammatory infiltration, vacuolization of epithelial and endothelial cells, fibrin deposition, microvascular ruptures with intra-alveolar hemorrhaging, and the formation of platelet-rich micro- and macrovascular thrombi (118;127;129;134;135). While clinical isolates have been shown to have the ability to generate NETs *in vitro,* there is to date no clear evidence to show whether this phenomena occurs in septic patients, or

Despite the success of many therapeutic agents in improving outcome in preclinical studies of sepsis, many have failed to demonstrate efficacy in the clinical setting. To illustrate, studies investigating the efficacy of anti-TNF therapies (5;5;136;137) and activated protein C (APC) were promising in animal studies, but this success failed to translate to clinical outcomes (35;73;138). Neutralization of TNF was beneficial in some models of endotoxemia challenge with viable gram-negative bacteria (e.g. group B streptococci) (139-145) but in other preclinical studies where microorganisms such as Candida, S. pneumoniae, Listeria, or mycobacteria were used, neutralizing TNF exacerbated outcome in animals subjected to the pathogenic challenge (36;70;136;137;146-149). In complex models of sepsis, no consistent harm or benefit was validated and some clinical studies found an increased mortality associated with anti-TNF therapy (150;151). Similar to anti-TNF therapy, some preclinical studies demonstrated the protective or therapeutic effect of APC (35;73;138) but these results failed to translate in some clinical studies (72). The therapeutic efficacy of anti-TNF therapy

## **6.2. NETosis in infection and sepsis**

In 2007, a landmark paper published by the Kubes group characterized the mechanism by which platelet-neutrophil interactions contribute to pathogenesis of severe sepsis. It was observed that LPS-induced endotoxemia in mice as well as plasma from severe sepsis patients were able to trigger NET formation but at a cost to the host. Upon detection of TLR4 ligands (e.g. LPS), platelets bind to neutrophils adhered to the endothelium (118). Within minutes, TLR4-dependent platelet-neutrophil interactions resulted in the robust release of granules and DNA in the form of NETs the integrity of which was maintained under flow conditions reflective of physiologic shear forces in the microvasculature (0.5 dyne/cm2). NET-mediated bacterial clearance through trapping and ensnaring of bacteria was primarily observed in liver sinusoids and lung capillaries, areas with the greatest capacity for immobilizing bacteria due to the decreased lumen size of vessels (118). However, formation of NETs is not without a cost as it was also found to cause cellular and tissue damage to the host. *In vitro*, NET formation resulted in endothelial cell damage marked by increased staining of propidium iodide, a nucleic acid stain impermeable to viable cells (118). *In vivo,*  NET formation was also found to cause hepatotoxicity in LPS-challenged mice indicated by the decreased perfusion of liver sinusoids and increase in levels of alanine aminotransferase, associated with platelet-mediated neutrophil activation. Given these findings, the authors propose that platelets act as a sensor or barometer (partially via TLR4 receptors) for pathogens in the blood, inducing a last resort immune response mediated by neutrophils to ensnare and kill bacteria at the expense of the host's tissues (118). In the already immunederegulated state of the septic host, NETs can exacerbate sepsis by releasing high concentrations of potent proteases, inducing further endothelial damage, and forming a chromatin meshwork, trapping host cells (erythrocytes, leukocytes, and platelets) which can potentiate inflammation, coagulation, ischemia, and hypoxia in downstream tissues.

## **6.3. NET pathogenicity**

NETs induce pathogenic effects via multiple mechanisms. Platelet-mediated NET formation trapped platelets, leukocytes, and red blood cells causing microvascular plugging and areas of ischemia in downstream tissues (118;119). Ischemic conditions increase the production of IL-8 (120) and reactive oxygen species (121) both of which can induce further NET formation (122). Several lines of evidence also suggest that NETs exert pro-coagulant effects in sepsis and other conditions of deregulated coagulation and inflammation. In studies of thrombosis, NETs were found to interact closely with fibrin and platelets via von Willebrand factor, fibronectin, and fibrinogen, effectively stabilizing platelet-rich clots (119;123). NETs perfused with blood or platelet-rich plasma stimulated platelet aggregation and promoted thrombus formation (124). Another *in vivo* study observed that both DNA and RNA provide a surface template on which activation of the contact pathway via XIIa/XIa promoting fibrinrich thrombus formation and decreased plasma clotting times (125). Antimicrobial proteins associated with NETs also exert pro-coagulant effects which are pathogenic to the host. Positively-charged histones promote red blood cell accumulation and platelet aggregation by electrostatic interactions with the negatively-charged cells (126). NETassociated histones also impair the natural anticoagulant protein C, activate platelets, and induce thrombin generation via platelet TLR2 and TLR4-mediated mechanisms (124;127- 129). Additionally, histones induce prothrombinase activity, increased P-selectin expression, phosphatidylserine exposure, and FV activation (127).

48 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

**6.2. NETosis in infection and sepsis**

**6.3. NET pathogenicity**

impair pathogenic invasion of gram-negative bacteria (e.g. *Shigella flexneri), gram-positive bacteria (e.g. Staphylococcus aureus, Group A streptococcus),* fungi (e.g. *Candida albicans)*, and

In 2007, a landmark paper published by the Kubes group characterized the mechanism by which platelet-neutrophil interactions contribute to pathogenesis of severe sepsis. It was observed that LPS-induced endotoxemia in mice as well as plasma from severe sepsis patients were able to trigger NET formation but at a cost to the host. Upon detection of TLR4 ligands (e.g. LPS), platelets bind to neutrophils adhered to the endothelium (118). Within minutes, TLR4-dependent platelet-neutrophil interactions resulted in the robust release of granules and DNA in the form of NETs the integrity of which was maintained under flow conditions reflective of physiologic shear forces in the microvasculature (0.5 dyne/cm2). NET-mediated bacterial clearance through trapping and ensnaring of bacteria was primarily observed in liver sinusoids and lung capillaries, areas with the greatest capacity for immobilizing bacteria due to the decreased lumen size of vessels (118). However, formation of NETs is not without a cost as it was also found to cause cellular and tissue damage to the host. *In vitro*, NET formation resulted in endothelial cell damage marked by increased staining of propidium iodide, a nucleic acid stain impermeable to viable cells (118). *In vivo,*  NET formation was also found to cause hepatotoxicity in LPS-challenged mice indicated by the decreased perfusion of liver sinusoids and increase in levels of alanine aminotransferase, associated with platelet-mediated neutrophil activation. Given these findings, the authors propose that platelets act as a sensor or barometer (partially via TLR4 receptors) for pathogens in the blood, inducing a last resort immune response mediated by neutrophils to ensnare and kill bacteria at the expense of the host's tissues (118). In the already immunederegulated state of the septic host, NETs can exacerbate sepsis by releasing high concentrations of potent proteases, inducing further endothelial damage, and forming a chromatin meshwork, trapping host cells (erythrocytes, leukocytes, and platelets) which can

potentiate inflammation, coagulation, ischemia, and hypoxia in downstream tissues.

NETs induce pathogenic effects via multiple mechanisms. Platelet-mediated NET formation trapped platelets, leukocytes, and red blood cells causing microvascular plugging and areas of ischemia in downstream tissues (118;119). Ischemic conditions increase the production of IL-8 (120) and reactive oxygen species (121) both of which can induce further NET formation (122). Several lines of evidence also suggest that NETs exert pro-coagulant effects in sepsis and other conditions of deregulated coagulation and inflammation. In studies of thrombosis, NETs were found to interact closely with fibrin and platelets via von Willebrand factor, fibronectin, and fibrinogen, effectively stabilizing platelet-rich clots (119;123). NETs perfused with blood or platelet-rich plasma stimulated platelet aggregation and promoted thrombus formation (124). Another *in vivo* study observed that both DNA and RNA provide a surface template on which activation of the contact pathway via XIIa/XIa promoting fibrin-

even viruses (e.g. influenza A virus) (100;102;106;107;107-110;112;114-117).

NETs and NET-associated proteins have also been found to exert pro-inflammatory effects. MPO released during NET formation binds the negatively-charged, proteoglycan-rich endothelium, inducing endothelial cell damage and vascular permeability (130;131). Incubation of NETs with human platelets and THP-1 cells resulted in the release of proinflammatory cytokines including IL-1β, IL-8, and TNFα (132).

The pathogenic nature of NETs is also supported by studies showing improved outcome associated with NET destruction via DNase administration (133). Furthermore, DNaseIdeficient mice develop lupus-like symptoms induced by NET formation, indicating that NET removal is likely a crucial process in the proper immune response (123). The formation of NETs and release of NET-associated proteins (e.g. histones) potentiate the proinflammatory and pro-coagulant response, both of which contribute to end organ morphology in sepsis. These changes include neutrophil adherence to microvascular endothelium, inflammatory infiltration, vacuolization of epithelial and endothelial cells, fibrin deposition, microvascular ruptures with intra-alveolar hemorrhaging, and the formation of platelet-rich micro- and macrovascular thrombi (118;127;129;134;135). While clinical isolates have been shown to have the ability to generate NETs *in vitro,* there is to date no clear evidence to show whether this phenomena occurs in septic patients, or whether this is associated with organ dysfunction or mortality.

## **7. Translation of preclinical studies to clinical outcomes**

Despite the success of many therapeutic agents in improving outcome in preclinical studies of sepsis, many have failed to demonstrate efficacy in the clinical setting. To illustrate, studies investigating the efficacy of anti-TNF therapies (5;5;136;137) and activated protein C (APC) were promising in animal studies, but this success failed to translate to clinical outcomes (35;73;138). Neutralization of TNF was beneficial in some models of endotoxemia challenge with viable gram-negative bacteria (e.g. group B streptococci) (139-145) but in other preclinical studies where microorganisms such as Candida, S. pneumoniae, Listeria, or mycobacteria were used, neutralizing TNF exacerbated outcome in animals subjected to the pathogenic challenge (36;70;136;137;146-149). In complex models of sepsis, no consistent harm or benefit was validated and some clinical studies found an increased mortality associated with anti-TNF therapy (150;151). Similar to anti-TNF therapy, some preclinical studies demonstrated the protective or therapeutic effect of APC (35;73;138) but these results failed to translate in some clinical studies (72). The therapeutic efficacy of anti-TNF therapy and APC in preclinical studies is largely influenced by the animal model used. Thus the appropriate translation of findings and inferences from preclinical studies to clinical outcomes in sepsis remains a heavily debated area.

Experimental Sepsis Models 51

This may contribute to the increased mortality in aged septic mice, a factor which would not accounted for when using young animals to model sepsis occurring in an aging population. The effect of age in sepsis in a clinical setting can be appreciated in the PROWESS trials. Substantial difference in absolute risk reduction of mortality were found to be associated with age in clinical sepsis (154). Age should be considered in animal studies of sepsis to

In addition to limitations produced by using young animals exclusively, male animals are almost exclusively chosen in intra-abdominal sepsis studies which poorly reflects the incidence of clinical sepsis in both genders around 40% of which is female (155). Male mice are often chosen over females to avoid confounding effects and variables posed by varied expression of biomarkers and circulating cells associated with different phases of the estrous cycle. For instance, steroid hormones are implicated in the expression of adhesion molecules resulting in different peripheral blood leukocyte concentrations and an altered coagulant response (156;157). Neutrophil concentrations and response to stimulation also vary considerably during different phases of the estrous cycle (158). For consistency, male mice are often chosen of sepsis studies, despite the similar occurrence of sepsis in males and females however, an investigator should consider, if feasible, treatments with one group for

The importance of early goal-directed treatment including adequate fluid resuscitation and treatment with antibiotics has been thoroughly demonstrated in severe sepsis and septic shock (159). Correction of hemodynamic abnormalities and hypovolemia associated with sepsis is integral to reducing mortality rates and improving sepsis outcomes. Hypovolemia compromises tissue oxygenation due to inadequate blood flow within the microvasculature and is the prime cause of organ dysfunction and failure (159). In order to differentiate pathology due to sepsis from pathology resulting solely from circulatory decline and lack of hemodynamic support, the administration of balanced fluids is crucial. This is supported by findings showing significant differences between the hemodynamic profiles of underresuscitated animals versus those with adequate supportive fluids, and aggressive fluid resuscitation was required to replicate hemodynamic profiles observed in patients with severe sepsis (47). In canines with septic shock, animals that received combination therapy of antibiotics and cardiovascular support (via fluid resuscitation and dopamine) had a 43% improvement in survival rates compared to septic animals treated with either therapy alone (160;160). Furthermore, experiments elucidating the effects of various fluid regimes on resuscitation in sepsis have demonstrated that lactated Ringer's crystalloid solution but not saline-based solutions reduced sepsis-induced leukocyte recruitment in the liver of mice subjected to CLP (161). Based on these studies, an appropriate fluid regime which would account for surgical losses and provide adequate hemodynamic support to maintain circulatory and cardiovascular function, as would occur in the management of clinical

sepsis, should be considered in preclinical studies of sepsis (12).

increase the clinical relevance to human sepsis.

*7.2.2. Gender*

each gender of animal used.

*7.2.3. Fluid resuscitation*

## **7.1. Critical appraisal of preclinical sepsis studies**

Limitations in both the use of animal models and design of experimental studies contribute to the poor translation of preclinical animal studies to clinical sepsis. Some limitations are inherent to the use of animals to model any clinical condition. It is commonly the case that young animals of a specific gender, species, genetic background, and nutritional status housed in a pathogen-free, sterile facility unexposed to the natural environment are used (5). Many of these elements are tightly controlled to maintain consistency at the expense of clinical relevance. However, an attempt at balancing both consistency and clinical relevance can be made if the investigator designs treatment groups for different animals (e.g. separate treatment groups for females and males, groups for young and aged mice, etc.) given the heterogeneity of the sepsis patient population.

Other limitations may be appropriately addressed by establishing clear research questions and implementing an experimental protocol which would adequately investigate these questions. For instance, if the objective of an animal study is to test the clinical applicability of a therapeutic agent, it would be more clinically relevant if therapies currently used for the management of sepsis including the adequate administration of resuscitation fluids, antibiotics, and supportive therapies (14) were incorporated into the experimental protocol of the animal study. Additionally, the experimental protocol of animal studies can be modified to include clinically relevant management procedures such as constant monitoring and assessment for hemodynamic parameters, tissue perfusion, or dehydration as would occur in clinical sepsis. Other factors which may contribute to the gap between findings in experimental and clinical studies include the time at which therapeutic agents are administered, the lack of staging of sepsis to reflect disease progression at different severities on the sepsis continuum or different patient populations, and the risk of experimenter bias in animal studies (5;12)

## **7.2. Limitations to the clinical relevance of animal studies**

## *7.2.1. Age*

It is commonly the case that murine studies of sepsis utilize 8 week-old mice, the physiological equivalent of a young adulthood in humans. However, the sepsis patient population consists largely of patients over 60 years of age which is not adequately represented in sepsis literature using animal models (152). There are limitations to examining the true pathophysiology and clinical treatment of a condition which occurs most commonly in the aging population when findings are extrapolated from preclinical studies using young, healthy mice exclusively. For example, aging is associated with increased apoptosis of rapidly dividing epithelial cells of the gut and spleen in animal sepsis (153). This may contribute to the increased mortality in aged septic mice, a factor which would not accounted for when using young animals to model sepsis occurring in an aging population. The effect of age in sepsis in a clinical setting can be appreciated in the PROWESS trials. Substantial difference in absolute risk reduction of mortality were found to be associated with age in clinical sepsis (154). Age should be considered in animal studies of sepsis to increase the clinical relevance to human sepsis.

### *7.2.2. Gender*

50 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

outcomes in sepsis remains a heavily debated area.

heterogeneity of the sepsis patient population.

experimenter bias in animal studies (5;12)

*7.2.1. Age*

**7.2. Limitations to the clinical relevance of animal studies**

**7.1. Critical appraisal of preclinical sepsis studies**

and APC in preclinical studies is largely influenced by the animal model used. Thus the appropriate translation of findings and inferences from preclinical studies to clinical

Limitations in both the use of animal models and design of experimental studies contribute to the poor translation of preclinical animal studies to clinical sepsis. Some limitations are inherent to the use of animals to model any clinical condition. It is commonly the case that young animals of a specific gender, species, genetic background, and nutritional status housed in a pathogen-free, sterile facility unexposed to the natural environment are used (5). Many of these elements are tightly controlled to maintain consistency at the expense of clinical relevance. However, an attempt at balancing both consistency and clinical relevance can be made if the investigator designs treatment groups for different animals (e.g. separate treatment groups for females and males, groups for young and aged mice, etc.) given the

Other limitations may be appropriately addressed by establishing clear research questions and implementing an experimental protocol which would adequately investigate these questions. For instance, if the objective of an animal study is to test the clinical applicability of a therapeutic agent, it would be more clinically relevant if therapies currently used for the management of sepsis including the adequate administration of resuscitation fluids, antibiotics, and supportive therapies (14) were incorporated into the experimental protocol of the animal study. Additionally, the experimental protocol of animal studies can be modified to include clinically relevant management procedures such as constant monitoring and assessment for hemodynamic parameters, tissue perfusion, or dehydration as would occur in clinical sepsis. Other factors which may contribute to the gap between findings in experimental and clinical studies include the time at which therapeutic agents are administered, the lack of staging of sepsis to reflect disease progression at different severities on the sepsis continuum or different patient populations, and the risk of

It is commonly the case that murine studies of sepsis utilize 8 week-old mice, the physiological equivalent of a young adulthood in humans. However, the sepsis patient population consists largely of patients over 60 years of age which is not adequately represented in sepsis literature using animal models (152). There are limitations to examining the true pathophysiology and clinical treatment of a condition which occurs most commonly in the aging population when findings are extrapolated from preclinical studies using young, healthy mice exclusively. For example, aging is associated with increased apoptosis of rapidly dividing epithelial cells of the gut and spleen in animal sepsis (153). In addition to limitations produced by using young animals exclusively, male animals are almost exclusively chosen in intra-abdominal sepsis studies which poorly reflects the incidence of clinical sepsis in both genders around 40% of which is female (155). Male mice are often chosen over females to avoid confounding effects and variables posed by varied expression of biomarkers and circulating cells associated with different phases of the estrous cycle. For instance, steroid hormones are implicated in the expression of adhesion molecules resulting in different peripheral blood leukocyte concentrations and an altered coagulant response (156;157). Neutrophil concentrations and response to stimulation also vary considerably during different phases of the estrous cycle (158). For consistency, male mice are often chosen of sepsis studies, despite the similar occurrence of sepsis in males and females however, an investigator should consider, if feasible, treatments with one group for each gender of animal used.

## *7.2.3. Fluid resuscitation*

The importance of early goal-directed treatment including adequate fluid resuscitation and treatment with antibiotics has been thoroughly demonstrated in severe sepsis and septic shock (159). Correction of hemodynamic abnormalities and hypovolemia associated with sepsis is integral to reducing mortality rates and improving sepsis outcomes. Hypovolemia compromises tissue oxygenation due to inadequate blood flow within the microvasculature and is the prime cause of organ dysfunction and failure (159). In order to differentiate pathology due to sepsis from pathology resulting solely from circulatory decline and lack of hemodynamic support, the administration of balanced fluids is crucial. This is supported by findings showing significant differences between the hemodynamic profiles of underresuscitated animals versus those with adequate supportive fluids, and aggressive fluid resuscitation was required to replicate hemodynamic profiles observed in patients with severe sepsis (47). In canines with septic shock, animals that received combination therapy of antibiotics and cardiovascular support (via fluid resuscitation and dopamine) had a 43% improvement in survival rates compared to septic animals treated with either therapy alone (160;160). Furthermore, experiments elucidating the effects of various fluid regimes on resuscitation in sepsis have demonstrated that lactated Ringer's crystalloid solution but not saline-based solutions reduced sepsis-induced leukocyte recruitment in the liver of mice subjected to CLP (161). Based on these studies, an appropriate fluid regime which would account for surgical losses and provide adequate hemodynamic support to maintain circulatory and cardiovascular function, as would occur in the management of clinical sepsis, should be considered in preclinical studies of sepsis (12).

#### 52 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

## *7.2.4. Patient heterogeneity*

The human septic population is diverse and highly heterogeneous. Clinical cases of sepsis are often much more complex than sepsis induced in animal studies. The diversity of infectious agents as well as sites of infection in clinical sepsis are not always reflected in animal studies, factors which should be considered in the translation of preclinical to clinical studies. For instance, clinical sepsis may result from trauma and subsequent fecal spillage into a sterile peritoneum or staphylococcal bacteremia in an elderly patient with congestive heart failure. Evidently, animal models like those inducing sepsis via injections of endotoxic bacterial components or even live bacteria fail to induce the range of conditions observed in a septic patient (5). To decrease this gap, one may choose to consider introducing cormorbidities as previously described or other trauma or infectious injuries to animal sepsis models.

Experimental Sepsis Models 53

physiological response, inflammatory parameters, survival) which can significantly alter response to treatment. These potential limitations are summarized in Table 1 adapted from

**7.4. Considerations to improve the translation of preclinical studies to clinical**

It is evident that experimental design greatly influences the findings of both experimental and clinical studies in sepsis. One method to increase the transparency, reproducibility, consistency, and efficacy of sepsis research is to increase standards for reporting of animal sepsis studies. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT 1996, 2001, and 2010) statement is a rigorous and highly standardized approach to conducting clinical research which addresses variability of results due to the study design and reporting of clinical trials (162-164). In an attempt to limit the variability in both the use of animal studies and reporting of results, Marshall et al. propose that a similar checklist should be required for preclinical studies (5). The checklist includes the following variables which should be explicitly described and recorded in detailed manner to ease pooling of results from various preclinical studies, define a framework from which to understand divergent results, improve the consistency of reporting of results, and enhance the reliability of reported results. The standards for reporting animal research in bioscience were raised further in 2010 with the publication of the ARRIVE guidelines, Animals in Research: Reporting *In Vivo*  Experiments (165). Below is an adaptation of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Checklist for Preclinical Studies proposed by Marshall et al. in 2005 with descriptions of methods by which these reporting standards could be maintained as suggested by Kilkenny

In the design and reporting of a preclinical sepsis study, a basic but crucial aspect that one should consider is the very definition of sepsis, the conditions and presentation of which differ from one animal model to another. Clinical sepsis is defined by meeting specific criteria which involve inflammatory, hemodynamic, organ dysfunction, and tissue perfusion variables. Sepsis is no longer defined solely by changes in physiological parameters (e.g. body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and white blood cell count) which are common to many other conditions. Likewise, defining sepsis based on levels of several biomarkers of inflammation, for instance fails to capture the complexity of cardiovascular, hormonal, metabolic, innate and adaptive immune changes which occur in this heterogeneous condition. Although it would be helpful to document changes in biomarkers and physiological parameters (e.g. heart rate, etc.), current preclinical studies are limited as the criteria which define sepsis (and the severity) in various animals have not been clearly elucidated. There is currently no consensus over the physiological parameters, levels of biomarkers, or variables of end organ health which would indicate sepsis in an animal although these parameters are much more clearly outlined by clinical

Marshall et al, 2005.

**outcomes**

et al. (Table 2).

*7.4.1. Sepsis definition*

**Table 1.** Limitations to the Clinical Relevance of Preclinical Studies

## **7.3. Summary of limitations**

Factors which limit the translation of preclinical studies to clinical outcomes include the following (5): the animal used for experimental studies (species, genetic background, gender, age, nutritional status following insult, comorbidities incorporated in model), the source of infection (organism, local vs. systemic challenge, adjuvants, tissue damage from challenge), dose and timing of intervention (administered before, concurrent with, or following insult), co-interventions (fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, analgesics, source removal), experimental design (risk bias, blinding, randomization, assay methodology), and parameters used as markers of outcome (quantification and choice of biomarker, physiological response, inflammatory parameters, survival) which can significantly alter response to treatment. These potential limitations are summarized in Table 1 adapted from Marshall et al, 2005.

## **7.4. Considerations to improve the translation of preclinical studies to clinical outcomes**

It is evident that experimental design greatly influences the findings of both experimental and clinical studies in sepsis. One method to increase the transparency, reproducibility, consistency, and efficacy of sepsis research is to increase standards for reporting of animal sepsis studies. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT 1996, 2001, and 2010) statement is a rigorous and highly standardized approach to conducting clinical research which addresses variability of results due to the study design and reporting of clinical trials (162-164). In an attempt to limit the variability in both the use of animal studies and reporting of results, Marshall et al. propose that a similar checklist should be required for preclinical studies (5). The checklist includes the following variables which should be explicitly described and recorded in detailed manner to ease pooling of results from various preclinical studies, define a framework from which to understand divergent results, improve the consistency of reporting of results, and enhance the reliability of reported results. The standards for reporting animal research in bioscience were raised further in 2010 with the publication of the ARRIVE guidelines, Animals in Research: Reporting *In Vivo*  Experiments (165). Below is an adaptation of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Checklist for Preclinical Studies proposed by Marshall et al. in 2005 with descriptions of methods by which these reporting standards could be maintained as suggested by Kilkenny et al. (Table 2).

## *7.4.1. Sepsis definition*

52 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

The human septic population is diverse and highly heterogeneous. Clinical cases of sepsis are often much more complex than sepsis induced in animal studies. The diversity of infectious agents as well as sites of infection in clinical sepsis are not always reflected in animal studies, factors which should be considered in the translation of preclinical to clinical studies. For instance, clinical sepsis may result from trauma and subsequent fecal spillage into a sterile peritoneum or staphylococcal bacteremia in an elderly patient with congestive heart failure. Evidently, animal models like those inducing sepsis via injections of endotoxic bacterial components or even live bacteria fail to induce the range of conditions observed in a septic patient (5). To decrease this gap, one may choose to consider introducing cormorbidities as

previously described or other trauma or infectious injuries to animal sepsis models.

Animal Species, genetic background, gender, age,

Source of Infection Single versus multiple organisms, local

Intervention Dose and timing of intervention compared

Co-interventions Fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, analgesics,

Experimental Design Risk bias (blinding or randomization

**Table 1.** Limitations to the Clinical Relevance of Preclinical Studies

**7.3. Summary of limitations**

Markers of Outcome Parameters used as markers of outcome

Factors which limit the translation of preclinical studies to clinical outcomes include the following (5): the animal used for experimental studies (species, genetic background, gender, age, nutritional status following insult, comorbidities incorporated in model), the source of infection (organism, local vs. systemic challenge, adjuvants, tissue damage from challenge), dose and timing of intervention (administered before, concurrent with, or following insult), co-interventions (fluid resuscitation, antibiotics, analgesics, source removal), experimental design (risk bias, blinding, randomization, assay methodology), and parameters used as markers of outcome (quantification and choice of biomarker,

nutritional status following insult, comorbidities incorporated in model

versus systemic challenge, addition of adjuvants, presence and extent of tissue

to septic insult (administered before, concurrent with, or following insult)

methods are used), assay methodology

(choice of biomarker and quantification methods, physiological response, inflammatory parameters, survival)

damage from challenge

source removal

*7.2.4. Patient heterogeneity*

In the design and reporting of a preclinical sepsis study, a basic but crucial aspect that one should consider is the very definition of sepsis, the conditions and presentation of which differ from one animal model to another. Clinical sepsis is defined by meeting specific criteria which involve inflammatory, hemodynamic, organ dysfunction, and tissue perfusion variables. Sepsis is no longer defined solely by changes in physiological parameters (e.g. body temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, and white blood cell count) which are common to many other conditions. Likewise, defining sepsis based on levels of several biomarkers of inflammation, for instance fails to capture the complexity of cardiovascular, hormonal, metabolic, innate and adaptive immune changes which occur in this heterogeneous condition. Although it would be helpful to document changes in biomarkers and physiological parameters (e.g. heart rate, etc.), current preclinical studies are limited as the criteria which define sepsis (and the severity) in various animals have not been clearly elucidated. There is currently no consensus over the physiological parameters, levels of biomarkers, or variables of end organ health which would indicate sepsis in an animal although these parameters are much more clearly outlined by clinical

#### 54 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

sepsis definition guidelines (1). This limitation will need to be addressed in future preclinical sepsis studies. Other parameters which may be informative of the septic condition in animals include appearance (perfusion of mucous membranes), urine production, and bacterial cultures from the blood, peritoneal fluid, and local site of infection, which may be considered in the design of animal studies. Successful animal studies should establish a clear definition of the conditions which would indicate a septic animal, explicitly defining the severity of disease induced as part of the study protocol (167).

Experimental Sepsis Models 55

research despite a significant proportion of the literature extrapolating results from animal studies to clinical sepsis (168). In one review of studies using animal models, more than 80% of research papers surveyed did not report the use of methods to minimize the risk of bias by the investigator (165;169). To improve the translation of inferences and findings from experimental sepsis to clinical sepsis in future studies, one should consider reducing the effects of experimenter bias by randomizing animals in the treatment groups of the study and blinding the experimenter to the intervention provided given that implementation of these elements would not compromise the protocol or results of the

In the absence of randomization, the results of clinical and animal studies may be unintentionally biased by factors which may influence study outcomes. Nonrandomized clinical studies have frequently shown a larger treatment effect than randomized control trials, an effect which should be studied and addressed in animal studies (168;170-173). Randomization involves taking proactive measures in assigning subjects to a treatment or control group in studies testing the efficacy of a potential treatment drug versus a placebo control or potential treatment drug versus a pre-existing treatment (167;173). The systematic randomization of subjects or animals minimizes allocation or selection bias by eliminating influences from unknown or known prognostic variables (like the hemodynamics in septic and nonseptic animals) which may influence the response to treatment, mortality, or outcome, unduly producing biased results in a study (166;170-172). Randomization also ensures that protocols and procedures are conducted consistently and systematically in treatment and control groups. Elements of animal studies where randomization may offer an efficacious benefit include the procedure to induce sepsis (preventing unintentional bias by variations in sepsis severity), treatment (consistent timing, route, and method of administering treatments or controls), monitoring of subjects following sepsis induction and

Although various methods of randomization have been established and recommended for different clinical trials, consensus and literature on randomization in pre-clinical and experimental studies are lacking. Simple randomization methods such as the "repeated fair coin-tossing" have been recommended for large clinical studies (n > 200), but are inadequate for studies with small samples sizes like experimental animal studies (167;173). Restricted randomization methods like permutated-block randomization where allocation ratios are used to specify the number of subjects in each group (or ratio of subjects in one treatment group to another) (170-172) successfully address this issue, but restricted randomization methods have not been validated in animal studies. Given that the risk of allocation and selection bias have been shown to unduly influence the results of clinical studies and that randomization and blinding have successfully minimized these risks, it is crucial that the same level of criticism and caution be applied in the experimental design and conducting of

treatment, and resuscitation procedures of the study groups (169;173).

experimental studies by addressing these risks (167;170-173).

study (5;166;167).

*7.4.3. Randomization*

**Table 2.** Checklist for the Reporting of Animal Studies

## *7.4.2. Experimental design*

In the interests of reproducibility and reliability, the method of sepsis induction, intervention (timing and dose), experimental protocol, inclusion of proper controls, randomization methods, and methods of experimenter blinding should be documented in detail. Although experimental methodologies are commonly recorded, there is a significant lack of attention to reduce experimenter bias by randomization and blinding, despite the confounding effects recently addressed in a systematic review of literature of studies using animal sepsis models. It was observed that only 2% of systematic reviews and meta-analyses appraised the risk of bias or clinical relevance of the underlying animal research despite a significant proportion of the literature extrapolating results from animal studies to clinical sepsis (168). In one review of studies using animal models, more than 80% of research papers surveyed did not report the use of methods to minimize the risk of bias by the investigator (165;169). To improve the translation of inferences and findings from experimental sepsis to clinical sepsis in future studies, one should consider reducing the effects of experimenter bias by randomizing animals in the treatment groups of the study and blinding the experimenter to the intervention provided given that implementation of these elements would not compromise the protocol or results of the study (5;166;167).

#### *7.4.3. Randomization*

54 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

(167).

sepsis definition guidelines (1). This limitation will need to be addressed in future preclinical sepsis studies. Other parameters which may be informative of the septic condition in animals include appearance (perfusion of mucous membranes), urine production, and bacterial cultures from the blood, peritoneal fluid, and local site of infection, which may be considered in the design of animal studies. Successful animal studies should establish a clear definition of the conditions which would indicate a septic animal, explicitly defining the severity of disease induced as part of the study protocol

Sepsis Definition Clear sepsis definition as indicators of

Animal Species, strain, genetic background, gender,

Experimental Design Method of sepsis induction (details which

Analytic Plan Primary and secondary endpoints, power

Co-Interventions Resuscitation fluids, antibiotics, source

In the interests of reproducibility and reliability, the method of sepsis induction, intervention (timing and dose), experimental protocol, inclusion of proper controls, randomization methods, and methods of experimenter blinding should be documented in detail. Although experimental methodologies are commonly recorded, there is a significant lack of attention to reduce experimenter bias by randomization and blinding, despite the confounding effects recently addressed in a systematic review of literature of studies using animal sepsis models. It was observed that only 2% of systematic reviews and meta-analyses appraised the risk of bias or clinical relevance of the underlying animal

Results Flowchart of included and excluded

**Table 2.** Checklist for the Reporting of Animal Studies

*7.4.2. Experimental design*

sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock in the

age, weight, handling, housing, feeding

indicate severity), intervention (timing and dose), experimental methodology, controls included, randomization methods, blinding

calculations for sample size determination, intention-to-treat analysis, criteria for animals excluded from studies (substitute

animals, establish mortality rates in studies

animal used (166)

conditions

of experimenter

endpoints)

conducted

removal, feeding

In the absence of randomization, the results of clinical and animal studies may be unintentionally biased by factors which may influence study outcomes. Nonrandomized clinical studies have frequently shown a larger treatment effect than randomized control trials, an effect which should be studied and addressed in animal studies (168;170-173). Randomization involves taking proactive measures in assigning subjects to a treatment or control group in studies testing the efficacy of a potential treatment drug versus a placebo control or potential treatment drug versus a pre-existing treatment (167;173). The systematic randomization of subjects or animals minimizes allocation or selection bias by eliminating influences from unknown or known prognostic variables (like the hemodynamics in septic and nonseptic animals) which may influence the response to treatment, mortality, or outcome, unduly producing biased results in a study (166;170-172). Randomization also ensures that protocols and procedures are conducted consistently and systematically in treatment and control groups. Elements of animal studies where randomization may offer an efficacious benefit include the procedure to induce sepsis (preventing unintentional bias by variations in sepsis severity), treatment (consistent timing, route, and method of administering treatments or controls), monitoring of subjects following sepsis induction and treatment, and resuscitation procedures of the study groups (169;173).

Although various methods of randomization have been established and recommended for different clinical trials, consensus and literature on randomization in pre-clinical and experimental studies are lacking. Simple randomization methods such as the "repeated fair coin-tossing" have been recommended for large clinical studies (n > 200), but are inadequate for studies with small samples sizes like experimental animal studies (167;173). Restricted randomization methods like permutated-block randomization where allocation ratios are used to specify the number of subjects in each group (or ratio of subjects in one treatment group to another) (170-172) successfully address this issue, but restricted randomization methods have not been validated in animal studies. Given that the risk of allocation and selection bias have been shown to unduly influence the results of clinical studies and that randomization and blinding have successfully minimized these risks, it is crucial that the same level of criticism and caution be applied in the experimental design and conducting of experimental studies by addressing these risks (167;170-173).

## *7.4.4. Blinding*

In addition to randomization, blinding of investigators also minimizes the risk of bias at many levels of the preclinical study. Blinding decreases differential treatment of animals in the study groups (more intensive monitoring or closer supervision of one treatment group over another) to unintentional biases in analyzing data and adjudicating outcomes (5;166). For instance, markers of disease severity or mortality outcome such as organ histology may be interpreted in a biased manner in an untreated control group versus the treated group if the investigator is not blinded to the treatment received (169). Likewise, marginal findings may be analyzed in a biased manner when interpretation of the outcome marker is subjective. In studies where substitute endpoints are used (such is the case when mortality is not used as endpoints for ethical reasons), blinding reduces the chance of experimenters prolonging the time to endpoint (in an attempt to establish a therapeutic effect when one does not exist) or decreasing the time to a substitute endpoint or even excluding animals (if unexpected results are observed in either treatment or control groups) (165;167;170;172). Blinding of the investigator to the treatment or control substance received minimizes the risk of experimenter bias.

Experimental Sepsis Models 57

*7.4.7. Exclusion criteria*

*7.4.8. Animal welfare*

**preclinical studies**

studies.

As in clinical studies, conditions under which subjects will be excluded should be clearly outlined before the animal study (169). The study should account for all animals, including those that do not complete the experimental protocol and observations and reasons for excluded animals should be appropriately documented. This is important to determine whether prognosis independent of the treatment may in actuality be related to the exclusion of certain subjects (5;174). Data should also be recorded and kept for subjects excluded from the study for any post-hoc analyses, standards which are expected of clinical

Many animal ethics and welfare committees are preventing the use of mortality as an endpoint and encouraging the use of surrogate markers of death. However, investigators and funding agencies are critical of such studies which do not use changes in mortality as a measure of therapeutic efficacy. There is currently no consensus nor scientific validation of clinically relevant, reliable substitute markers of death in septic animals (5;174). Moreover, there is concern over the use of analgesics and anaesthetics which have been shown to interfere with components in the natural progression of sepsis and even exert protective, anti-inflammatory effects. For example, *in vivo* and *in vitro* studies have elucidated that pentobarbital significantly reduces the LPS-induced inflammatory response by suppressing TNF α mRNA and protein expression by NF-κB and p38 MAP kinase (176). The concern over analgesics and anaesthetics Interfering with disease progression and treatment response may cause some reluctance towards the appropriate use of analgesics and anaesthetics in preclinical studies. Although scientific concern is warranted, these findings highlight the importance of considering drug effects and incorporating them into the experimental design, as it should be noted that analgesics and anaesthetics are clinically relevant to treatment and management of the septic patient, and from the standpoint of relevance (not to mention from an ethical standpoint), should not be excluded in animal studies. To improve clinical relevance and translation of studies utilizing experimental models, the appropriate use of these drugs with further understanding of their effects

should be integrated rather than avoided in preclinical studies of sepsis (5;165).

**7.5. Recommendations for a thorough validation of therapeutic efficacy in**

Given the potential limitations of preclinical studies when designing preclinical studies with potential clinical applications, one should take a critical approach when validating the therapeutic efficacy of a potential drug in preclinical studies. Recommendations for conducting preclinical studies with clinical applications will be provided with the intent to address the concerns raised previously. Literature by Marshall et al. suggest that early proof

## *7.4.5. Analytic plan*

The analytic plan should be described in detail such that the procedure is reproducible by others and variations in models used by other investigators can be appreciated (e.g. size and number of enterotomies and location of ligature in a CLP model) when comparing various preclinical studies (5). Primary and secondary endpoints of the study should be clearly outlined, whether they are to determine the efficacy of a potential therapy, improve prognosis, or diagnosis of sepsis. If the primary objective is to investigate a potential therapy, endpoints and markers of outcome of the animal study should also be clinically relevant (166;173;174). The measurement of outcome should also appropriately reflect markers relevant to the potential therapy being tested*.* For example, the coagulant state of the animals should be measured if the drug being tested acts via its anticoagulant effects. While mortality is the most informative marker of outcome in clinical sepsis, organ health and dysfunction are useful surrogate markers of outcome due to their relevance to clinical sepsis (173).

### *7.4.6. Power calculations*

In studies elucidating the therapeutic potential of a compound, power calculations can be used to reliably determine the sample size required to show that an effect is associated with treatment as well as exclude an effect when none exists (5). The magnitude of a treatment effect is most commonly expressed as the relative risk reduction (RRR, RRR = [1-(X/Y)] x 100 where Y is the proportion of animals that expired in the treatment group and X is the proportion of animals that expired in the control group (175). Given that mortality (and therefore the power of the study) will be altered should any subjects be excluded, the exclusion of subjects should only occur if subjects meet pre-established criteria.

#### *7.4.7. Exclusion criteria*

56 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

In addition to randomization, blinding of investigators also minimizes the risk of bias at many levels of the preclinical study. Blinding decreases differential treatment of animals in the study groups (more intensive monitoring or closer supervision of one treatment group over another) to unintentional biases in analyzing data and adjudicating outcomes (5;166). For instance, markers of disease severity or mortality outcome such as organ histology may be interpreted in a biased manner in an untreated control group versus the treated group if the investigator is not blinded to the treatment received (169). Likewise, marginal findings may be analyzed in a biased manner when interpretation of the outcome marker is subjective. In studies where substitute endpoints are used (such is the case when mortality is not used as endpoints for ethical reasons), blinding reduces the chance of experimenters prolonging the time to endpoint (in an attempt to establish a therapeutic effect when one does not exist) or decreasing the time to a substitute endpoint or even excluding animals (if unexpected results are observed in either treatment or control groups) (165;167;170;172). Blinding of the investigator to the treatment or control substance received minimizes the

The analytic plan should be described in detail such that the procedure is reproducible by others and variations in models used by other investigators can be appreciated (e.g. size and number of enterotomies and location of ligature in a CLP model) when comparing various preclinical studies (5). Primary and secondary endpoints of the study should be clearly outlined, whether they are to determine the efficacy of a potential therapy, improve prognosis, or diagnosis of sepsis. If the primary objective is to investigate a potential therapy, endpoints and markers of outcome of the animal study should also be clinically relevant (166;173;174). The measurement of outcome should also appropriately reflect markers relevant to the potential therapy being tested*.* For example, the coagulant state of the animals should be measured if the drug being tested acts via its anticoagulant effects. While mortality is the most informative marker of outcome in clinical sepsis, organ health and dysfunction are

useful surrogate markers of outcome due to their relevance to clinical sepsis (173).

exclusion of subjects should only occur if subjects meet pre-established criteria.

In studies elucidating the therapeutic potential of a compound, power calculations can be used to reliably determine the sample size required to show that an effect is associated with treatment as well as exclude an effect when none exists (5). The magnitude of a treatment effect is most commonly expressed as the relative risk reduction (RRR, RRR = [1-(X/Y)] x 100 where Y is the proportion of animals that expired in the treatment group and X is the proportion of animals that expired in the control group (175). Given that mortality (and therefore the power of the study) will be altered should any subjects be excluded, the

*7.4.4. Blinding*

risk of experimenter bias.

*7.4.6. Power calculations*

*7.4.5. Analytic plan*

As in clinical studies, conditions under which subjects will be excluded should be clearly outlined before the animal study (169). The study should account for all animals, including those that do not complete the experimental protocol and observations and reasons for excluded animals should be appropriately documented. This is important to determine whether prognosis independent of the treatment may in actuality be related to the exclusion of certain subjects (5;174). Data should also be recorded and kept for subjects excluded from the study for any post-hoc analyses, standards which are expected of clinical studies.

#### *7.4.8. Animal welfare*

Many animal ethics and welfare committees are preventing the use of mortality as an endpoint and encouraging the use of surrogate markers of death. However, investigators and funding agencies are critical of such studies which do not use changes in mortality as a measure of therapeutic efficacy. There is currently no consensus nor scientific validation of clinically relevant, reliable substitute markers of death in septic animals (5;174). Moreover, there is concern over the use of analgesics and anaesthetics which have been shown to interfere with components in the natural progression of sepsis and even exert protective, anti-inflammatory effects. For example, *in vivo* and *in vitro* studies have elucidated that pentobarbital significantly reduces the LPS-induced inflammatory response by suppressing TNF α mRNA and protein expression by NF-κB and p38 MAP kinase (176). The concern over analgesics and anaesthetics Interfering with disease progression and treatment response may cause some reluctance towards the appropriate use of analgesics and anaesthetics in preclinical studies. Although scientific concern is warranted, these findings highlight the importance of considering drug effects and incorporating them into the experimental design, as it should be noted that analgesics and anaesthetics are clinically relevant to treatment and management of the septic patient, and from the standpoint of relevance (not to mention from an ethical standpoint), should not be excluded in animal studies. To improve clinical relevance and translation of studies utilizing experimental models, the appropriate use of these drugs with further understanding of their effects should be integrated rather than avoided in preclinical studies of sepsis (5;165).

## **7.5. Recommendations for a thorough validation of therapeutic efficacy in preclinical studies**

Given the potential limitations of preclinical studies when designing preclinical studies with potential clinical applications, one should take a critical approach when validating the therapeutic efficacy of a potential drug in preclinical studies. Recommendations for conducting preclinical studies with clinical applications will be provided with the intent to address the concerns raised previously. Literature by Marshall et al. suggest that early proof

#### 58 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

of concept studies should 1) delineate a potential pathological role for the target in question by quantifying its increases in a simple acute model like endotoxemia or bacteremia (LPS or E. coli challenge) and 2) demonstrate that attenuating such target may improve outcome or offer some therapeutic benefit by a measurable decrease in harmful effects of the initial challenge or insult (5;165;174). If a proof of concept can be established, time course studies should be conducted to determine if the potential treatment offers therapeutic effects if administered before, during the progression of, or after the insult in both simple acute and complex models (e.g. LPS challenge and CLP). Experimental methodology and design of further studies should consider the results of studies on targets with similar biological or pathophysiological effects. Any adverse effects of the intervention, like impairment of the host's natural anti-microbial immune function or further dysregulation of the coagulant state should be determined in a high-risk model using live organisms as the challenges. (5;174) Moreover, the systemic physiological and biological responses to the therapeutic intervention (e.g. cardiac output, oxygenation, glomerular filtration) should be determined in a large animal model, given the limitations of small rodent models of sepsis. Interventions used in the management of clinical sepsis such as fluid resuscitation, ventilatory support, and hemodynamic monitoring, can be incorporated into the study design of preclinical trials using large animal models (5).

Experimental Sepsis Models 59

[1] Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care

[2] Namas R, Zamora R, Namas R, An G, Doyle J, Dick TE, et al. Sepsis: Something old,

[3] Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock--a review of laboratory

[6] Clowes GH, Jr., Zuschneid W, Turner M, Blackburn G, Rubin J, Toala P, et al. Observations on the pathogenesis of the pneumonitis associated with severe infections

[7] Sloane DR, Clowes GJ. Traumatic intramural haematoma of the duodenum. Med J Aust

[8] Wright NG, Cornwell HJ, Thompson H. Canine adenovirus nephritis. J Small Anim

[9] Wright NG, Thompson H, Cornwell HJ. Canine adenovirus pneumonia. Res Vet Sci

[10] Ryan CJ, Benjamin IS, Blumgart LH. Portacaval transposition in the rat: a new

[11] Rittirsch D, Huber-Lang MS, Flierl MA, Ward PA. Immunodesign of experimental

[12] Dejager L, Pinheiro I, Dejonckheere E, Libert C. Cecal ligation and puncture: the gold

[16] Riedemann NC, Guo RF, Ward PA. Novel strategies for the treatment of sepsis. Nat

[17] Riedemann NC, Guo RF, Hollmann TJ, Gao Hong, Neff TA, Reuben JS, et al. Regulatory role of C5a in LPS-induced IL-6 production by neutrophils during sepsis. The FASEB

[18] Huber-Lang M, Sarma VJ, Lu KT, McGuire SR, Padgaonkar VA, Guo RF, et al. Role of

C5a in multiorgan failure during sepsis. J Immunol 2001, 166:1193-9.

technique and its effects on liver and body weight. Br J Surg 1974, 61:224-8.

standard model for polymicrobial sepsis? Trends Microbiol 2011, 19:198-208. [13] Bone RC. Sir Isaac Newton, sepsis, SIRS, and CARS. Crit Care Med 1996, 24:1125-8. [14] Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Intensive Care Med 2008, 34:17-60. [15] Remick DG, Newcomb DE, Bolgos GL, Call DR. Comparison of the mortality and inflammatory response of two models of sepsis: lipopolysaccharide vs. cecal ligation

sepsis by cecal ligation and puncture. Nat Protocols 2008, 4:31-6.

[4] Deitch EA. Rodent models of intra-abdominal infection. Shock 2005, 24 Suppl 1:19-23. [5] Marshall JC, Deitch E, Moldawer LL, Opal S, Redl H, Poll Tvd. Preclinical Models of

something new, and a systems view. J Crit Care 2012, 27:314-11.

Shock and Sepsis: What Can They Tell Us? Shock 2005, 24 Suppl 1:1-6.

models and a proposal. J Surg Res 1980, 29:189-201.

in other parts of the body. Ann Surg 1968, 167:630-50.

**9. References**

Med 2003, 31:1250-6.

1968, 2:1184-5.

1971, 12:162-7.

Pract 1971, 12:657-64.

and puncture. Shock 2000, 13:110-6.

Med 2003, 9:517-24.

Journal 2004, 18:370-2.

## **8. Goals for the future of experimental sepsis research**

Goals for the future use of experimental sepsis models ought to focus on improving the relevance, translation, and applicability of results and inferences from animal studies to what is observed clinically. This requires consideration of the limitations of current sepsis models described such as considering age, gender, genetic background, nutritional status, and the environment of the housing facility, incorporating cormorbidities and supportive therapies which may be clinically relevant, and finally addressing the risk of bias by randomization and blinding methods in preclinical studies of sepsis.

## **Author details**

Safiah Mai, Momina Khan and Patricia Liaw\* *McMaster University, Canada David Braley Research Institute, Canada*

Alison Fox-Robichaud\* *McMaster University, Canada David Braley Research Institute, Canada Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada*

<sup>\*</sup> on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group (CCCTBG)

#### **9. References**

58 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

using large animal models (5).

**Author details**

*McMaster University, Canada*

Alison Fox-Robichaud\* *McMaster University, Canada*

 \*

Safiah Mai, Momina Khan and Patricia Liaw\*

*David Braley Research Institute, Canada*

*David Braley Research Institute, Canada Hamilton Health Sciences, Canada*

**8. Goals for the future of experimental sepsis research**

randomization and blinding methods in preclinical studies of sepsis.

on behalf of the Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group (CCCTBG)

Goals for the future use of experimental sepsis models ought to focus on improving the relevance, translation, and applicability of results and inferences from animal studies to what is observed clinically. This requires consideration of the limitations of current sepsis models described such as considering age, gender, genetic background, nutritional status, and the environment of the housing facility, incorporating cormorbidities and supportive therapies which may be clinically relevant, and finally addressing the risk of bias by

of concept studies should 1) delineate a potential pathological role for the target in question by quantifying its increases in a simple acute model like endotoxemia or bacteremia (LPS or E. coli challenge) and 2) demonstrate that attenuating such target may improve outcome or offer some therapeutic benefit by a measurable decrease in harmful effects of the initial challenge or insult (5;165;174). If a proof of concept can be established, time course studies should be conducted to determine if the potential treatment offers therapeutic effects if administered before, during the progression of, or after the insult in both simple acute and complex models (e.g. LPS challenge and CLP). Experimental methodology and design of further studies should consider the results of studies on targets with similar biological or pathophysiological effects. Any adverse effects of the intervention, like impairment of the host's natural anti-microbial immune function or further dysregulation of the coagulant state should be determined in a high-risk model using live organisms as the challenges. (5;174) Moreover, the systemic physiological and biological responses to the therapeutic intervention (e.g. cardiac output, oxygenation, glomerular filtration) should be determined in a large animal model, given the limitations of small rodent models of sepsis. Interventions used in the management of clinical sepsis such as fluid resuscitation, ventilatory support, and hemodynamic monitoring, can be incorporated into the study design of preclinical trials

[19] Huber-Lang MS, Riedeman NC, Sarma JV, Younkin EM, McGuire SR, Laudes IJ, et al. Protection of innate immunity by C5aR antagonist in septic mice. FASEB J 2002, 16:1567-74.

Experimental Sepsis Models 61

[34] Yuan Y, Ren J, Wu X, Cao S, Li J. Exogenous C3 postpones complement exhaustion and

[35] Kerschen EJ, Fernandez JA, Cooley BC, Yang XV, Sood R, Mosnier LO, et al. Endotoxemia and sepsis mortality reduction by non-anticoagulantГÇôactivated protein

[36] Echtenacher B, Falk W, M+ñnnel DN, Krammer PH. Requirement of endogenous tumor necrosis factor/cachectin for recovery from experimental peritonitis. The Journal of

[37] Ebach DR, Riehl TE, Stenson WF. Opposing effects of tumor necrosis factor receptor 1

[38] Moreno SE, Alves-Filho JC, Alfaya TM, da Silva JS, Ferreira SH, Liew FY. IL-12, but not IL-18, is critical to neutrophil activation and resistance to polymicrobial sepsis induced

[39] Michie HR. The value of animal models in the development of new drugs for the treatment of the sepsis syndrome. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1998, 41

[40] Guckian JC, Morrey BF, Kirby HB. Role of Lysosomes and Cathepsin Inhibitor in Plasma during Pneumococcal Infection. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 1970,

[41] Chiavolini D, Pozzi G, Ricci S. Animal Models of Streptococcus pneumoniae Disease.

[42] Matute-Bello G, Frevert C, Kajikawa O, Skerrett S, Goodman R, Park D, et al. Septic Shock and Acute Lung Injury in Rabbits with Peritonitis. American Journal of

[43] Guckian JC. Coagulopathy in Experimental Sepsis with Streptococcus pneumoniae in Rabbits: Effect of Drug Therapy and Splenectomy. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1976,

[44] Natanson C, Fink MP, Ballantyne HK, MacVittie TJ, Conklin JJ, Parrillo JE. Gramnegative bacteremia produces both severe systolic and diastolic cardiac dysfunction in a

[46] Song R, Kim J, Yu D, Park C, Park J. Kinetics of IL-6 and TNF-+¦ changes in a canine model of sepsis induced by endotoxin. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology

[47] Zanotti-Cavazzoni SL, Goldfarb RD. Animal Models of-áSepsis. Crit Care Clin 2009,

[48] Reilly PM, Wilkins KB, Fuh KC, Haglund U, Bulkley GB. The mesenteric hemodynamic

[49] Fink MP, Heard SO. Laboratory models of sepsis and septic shock. Journal of Surgical

response to circulatory shock: an overview. Shock 2001, 15:329-43.

canine model that simulates human septic shock. J Clin Invest 1986, 78:259-70. [45] Nagy S, Tárnoky K TLBMKG. A canine model of hyperdynamic sepsis induced by

confers organ protection in murine sepsis. J Surg Res 2011, 168:e87-e94.

and 2 in sepsis due to cecal ligation and puncture. Shock 2005, 23:311-8.

C. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 2007, 204:2439-48.

by cecal ligation and puncture. J Immunol 2006, 177:3218-24.

Clinical Microbiology Reviews 2008, 21:666-85.

Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2001, 163:234-43.

intestinal ischemia. Acta Physiol Hung 1990, 75:303-20.

Immunology 1990, 145:3762-6.

Suppl 1:47-9.

122:290-302.

134:150-7.

2012, 146:143-9.

Research 1990 Aug, 49:186-96.

25:703-19.

[34] Yuan Y, Ren J, Wu X, Cao S, Li J. Exogenous C3 postpones complement exhaustion and confers organ protection in murine sepsis. J Surg Res 2011, 168:e87-e94.

60 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

Immun 2010, 78:1582-92.

16:1567-74.

[19] Huber-Lang MS, Riedeman NC, Sarma JV, Younkin EM, McGuire SR, Laudes IJ, et al. Protection of innate immunity by C5aR antagonist in septic mice. FASEB J 2002,

[20] Czermak BJ, Sarma V, Pierson CL, Warner RL, Huber-Lang M, Bless NM, et al.

[21] Hotchkiss RS, Coopersmith CM, McDunn JE, Ferguson TA. The sepsis seesaw: tilting

[22] Muenzer JT, Davis CG, Chang K, Schmidt RE, Dunne WM, Coopersmith CM, et al. Characterization and modulation of the immunosuppressive phase of sepsis. Infect

[23] Hotchkiss RS, Nicholson DW. Apoptosis and caspases regulate death and inflammation

[24] Maier S, Traeger T, Entleutner M, Westerholt A, Kleist B, Huser N, et al. Cecal ligation and puncture versus colon ascendens stent peritonitis: two distinct animal models for

[25] Schabbauer G. Polymicrobial sepsis models: CLP versus CASP. Drug Discovery Today:

[26] Zantl N, Uebe A, Neumann B, Wagner H, Siewert JR, Holzmann B, et al. Essential Role of Gamma Interferon in Survival of Colon Ascendens Stent Peritonitis, a Novel Murine

[27] Buras JA, Holzmann B, Sitkovsky M. Animal Models of sepsis: setting the stage. Nat

[28] Traeger T, Mikulcak M, Eipel C, Abshagen K, Diedrich S, Heidecke CD, et al. Kupffer cell depletion reduces hepatic inflammation and apoptosis but decreases survival in

[29] Emmanuilidis K, Weighardt H, Maier S, Gerauer K, Fleischmann T, Zheng XX, et al. Critical role of Kupffer cell-derived IL-10 for host defense in septic peritonitis. J

[30] Hammer M, Echtenachter B, Weighardt H, Jozefowski K, Rose-John S, Mannel DN, et al. Increased inflammation and lethality of Dusp1-/- mice in polymicrobial peritonitis

[31] Daubeuf B, Mathison J, Spiller S, Hugues S, Herren S, Ferlin W, et al. TLR4/MD-2 monoclonal antibody therapy affords protection in experimental models of septic

[32] Weighardt H, Kaiser-Moore S, Vabulas RM, Kirschning CJ, Wagner H, Holzmann B. Cutting edge: myeloid differentiation factor 88 deficiency improves resistance against

[33] Markus E, Traeger T, Westerholt A, Holzmann B, Stier A, Pfeffer K, Maier S, Heidecke CD. Impact of interleukin-12, oxidative burst, and iNOS on the survival of murine fecal

sepsis caused by polymicrobial infection. J Immunol 2002, 169:2823-7.

peritonitis. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 2006, 21:64-70.

Model of Abdominal Sepsis. Infection and Immunity 1998, 66:2300-9.

abdominal sepsis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 Sep, 22:1039-49.

Protective effects of C5a blockade in sepsis. Nat Med 1999, 5:788-92.

toward immunosuppression. Nat Med 2009, 15:496-7.

in sepsis. Nat Rev Immunol 2006, 6:813-22.

polymicrobial sepsis. Shock 2004, 21:505-11.

Disease Models 2012, 9:e17-e21.

Rev Drug Discov 2005, 4:854-65.

Immunol 2001, 167:3919-27.

models. Immunology 2010, 131:395-404.

shock. J Immunol 2007, 179:6107-14.

[50] Spapen H, Zhang H, Wisse E, Baekeland M, Seynaeve C, Eddouks M, et al. The 21- Aminosteroid U74389G Enhances Hepatic Blood Flow and Preserves Sinusoidal Endothelial Cell Function and Structure in Endotoxin-Shocked Dogs. Journal of Surgical Research 1999, 86:183-91.

Experimental Sepsis Models 63

[64] Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Traber LD, Westphal M, Enkhbaatar P, Morita N, et al. Gentamicin Improves Hemodynamics in Ovine Septic Shock After Smoke Inhalation

[65] Maybauer DM, Maybauer MO, Szab+¦ C, Cox RA, Westphal M, Kiss L, et al. The Peroxynitrite Catalyst WW-85 Improves Pulmonary Function in Ovine Septic Shock.

[66] Calzavacca P, Ramchandra R, Booth L, Bellomo R, May CN. Cardiovascular effects of beta-blockade in a sheep model of severe sepsis. Critical Care 2011, 15 Suppl 3:P36. [67] Lange M, Ertmer C, Rehberg S, Morelli A, K+Âhler G, Kampmeier T, et al. Effects of two different dosing regimens of terlipressin on organ functions in ovine endotoxemia.

[68] Su F, Huang H, He X, Simuen D, Xie J, Orbach A, et al. Effects of a Novel Anticoagulant Compound (TV7130) in an Ovine Model of Septic Shock. Shock 2010, 34:622-7. [69] Waerhaug K, Kuklin V, Kirov M, Sovershaev M, Langbakk B, Ingebretsen O, et al. Recombinant human activated protein C attenuates endotoxin-induced lung injury in

[70] Redl H, Bahrami S. Large Animal Models: Baboons for Trauma, Shock, and Sepsis

[71] Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular

[72] Ranieri VM, Thompson BT, Barie PS, Dhainaut JF, Douglas IS, Finfer S, et al. Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock. N Engl J Med 2012, 366:2055-64. [73] Taylor FB, Chang A, Esmon CT, D'Angelo A, Vigano-D'Angelo S, Blick KE. Protein C prevents the coagulopathic and lethal effects of Escherichia coli infusion in the baboon.

[74] Shah BR, Hux JE. Quantifying the Risk of Infectious Diseases for People With Diabetes.

[75] Jacober SJ, Sowers JR. An Update on Perioperative Management of Diabetes. Arch

[76] Browne JA, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Bethel MA, Richardson WJ. Diabetes and Early

[77] Kornum JB, Thomsen RW, Riis A, Lervang HH, Sch+©nheyder HC, S+©rensen HT. Diabetes, Glycemic Control, and Risk of Hospitalization With Pneumonia. Diabetes

[78] Moss M. Epidemiology of Sepsis: Race, Sex, and Chronic Alcohol Abuse. Clinical

[79] Jacob A, Steinberg ML, Yang J, Dong W, Ji Y, Wang P. Sepsis-induced inflammation in

[80] Edwards MS, Fuselier PA. Enhanced susceptibility of mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes to type II group B streptococcal infection. Infection and Immunity 1983, 39:580-

exacerated in an animal model of type II diabetes. Int J Cli Exp Med, 1:22-31.

Postoperative Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion. Spine 2007, 32:2214-9.

histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med 2009, 15:1318-21.

Injury. Shock 2005, 24:226-31

Inflammation Research 2011, 60:429-37.

awake sheep. Critical Care 2008, 12:R104.

Studies. Shock 2005, 24:88-93.

J Clin Invest 1987, 79:918-25.

Diabetes Care 2003, 26:510-3.

Intern Med 1999, 159:2405-11.

Infectious Diseases 2005, 41 Suppl 7:S490-S497.

Care 2008, 31:1541-5.

5.

Shock 2011, 35:148-55.

[64] Maybauer MO, Maybauer DM, Traber LD, Westphal M, Enkhbaatar P, Morita N, et al. Gentamicin Improves Hemodynamics in Ovine Septic Shock After Smoke Inhalation Injury. Shock 2005, 24:226-31

62 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

Research 1999, 86:183-91.

dysfunction. Clinics 2007, 62:491-8.

and Disposition 1996, 24:1028-31.

2001, 164:1890-5.

1999, 189:450-8.

2011, 39:783-92.

in sheep. Shock 1994, 1:291-8.

Burn Mortality. Annals of Surgery 1987, 205:82-7.

63.

[50] Spapen H, Zhang H, Wisse E, Baekeland M, Seynaeve C, Eddouks M, et al. The 21- Aminosteroid U74389G Enhances Hepatic Blood Flow and Preserves Sinusoidal Endothelial Cell Function and Structure in Endotoxin-Shocked Dogs. Journal of Surgical

[51] Cohen R, Hassell A, Marzouk K, Marini C, Liush S, Scharf S. Renal Effects of Nitric Oxide in Endotoxemia. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

[52] Ji MH, Yang JJ, Wu J, Li RQ, Li GM, Fan YX, et al. Experimental sepsis in pigs- effects of vasopressin on renal, hepatic, and intestinal dysfunction. Ups J Med Sci 2012, 117: 257-

[53] Azevedo LCP, Park M, Noritomi DT, Maciel AT, Brunialti MK, Salomúo R. Characterization of an animal model of severe sepsis associated with respiratory

[54] Luiking YC, Poeze M, Ramsay G, Deutz NEP. The Role of Arginine in Infection and

[55] Allen EM, Rowin M, Pappas JB, Vernon DD, Dean JM. Hemodynamic effects of Nacetylamrinone in a porcine model of group B streptococcal sepsis. Drug Metabolism

[56] Greif WM, Forse RA. Interventions to improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics during laparoscopy in a porcine sepsis model. Journal of the American College of Surgeons

[57] Kato T, Hussein MH, Sugiura T, Suzuki S, Fukuda S, Tanaka T, et al. Development and Characterization of A Novel Porcine Model of Neonatal Sepsis. Shock 2004, 21:329-35. [58] Ertmer C, Kampmeier TG, Rehberg S, Morelli A, K+Âhler G, Lange M, et al. Effects of balanced crystalloid vs. 0.9% saline-based vs. balanced 6% tetrastarch infusion on renal function and tubular integrity in ovine endotoxemic shock\*. Critical Care Medicine

[59] Noda H, Noshima S, Nakazawa H, Meyer J, Herndon DN, Redl H, et al. Left ventricular dysfunction and acute lung injury induced by continuous administration of endotoxin

[60] Traber DL, Herndon DN, Stein MD, Traber LD, Flynn JT, Niehaus GD. The pulmonary

[61] Soejima K, Schmalstieg FC, Sakurai H, Traber LD, Traber DL. Pathophysiological analysis of combined burn and smoke inhalation injuries in sheep. American Journal of

[63] Traber DL, Herndon DN, Stein MD, Traber LD, Flynn JT, Niehaus GD. The pulmonary

lesion of smoke inhalation in an ovine model. Circ Shock 1986, 18:311-23.

lesion of smoke inhalation in an ovine model. Circ Shock 2012, 18:311-23.

Physiology - Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology 2001, 280:L1233-L1241. [62] Shirani KZ, Pruitt B, Mason ADJ. The Influence of Inhalation Injury and Pneumonia on

Sepsis. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition 2005, 29:S70-S74.

	- [81] Yamashiro S, Kawakami K, Uezu K, Kinjo T, Miyagi K, Nakamura K, et al. Lower expression of Th1-related cytokines and inducible nitric oxide synthase in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clinical & Experimental Immunology 2005, 139:57-64.

Experimental Sepsis Models 65

[96] Kaisho T, Akira S. Dendritic-cell function in Toll-like receptor- and MyD88-knockout

[97] Zhang D, Zhang G, Hayden MS, Greenblatt MB, Bussey C, Flavell RA, et al. A Toll-like Receptor That Prevents Infection by Uropathogenic Bacteria. Science 2004, 303:1522-6. [98] Sugawara I, Yamada H, Li C, Mizuno S, Takeuchi O, Akira S. Mycobacterial infection in

[99] Tschop J, Nogueiras R, Haas-Lockie S, Kasten KR, Castaneda TR, Huber N, et al. CNS Leptin Action Modulates Immune Response and Survival in Sepsis. The Journal of

[100] Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al.

[101] Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons.

[102] Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, et al. Novel cell death

[103] Papayannopoulos V, Metzler KD, Hakkim A, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol

[104] Remijsen Q, Kuijpers TW, Wirawan E, Lippens S, Vandenabeele P, Vanden Berghe T. Dying for a cause: NETosis, mechanisms behind an antimicrobial cell death modality.

[105] Vandenabeele P, Galluzzi L, Vanden Berghe T, Kroemer G. Molecular mechanisms of necroptosis: an ordered cellular explosion. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2010, 11:700-14. [106] Bruns S, Kniemeyer O, Hasenberg M, Aimanianda V, Nietzsche S, Thywissen A, et al. Production of extracellular traps against Aspergillus fumigatus in vitro and in infected lung tissue is dependent on invading neutrophils and influenced by hydrophobin

[107] Urban CF, Reichard U, Brinkmann V, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil extracellular traps capture and kill Candida albicans yeast and hyphal forms. Cell Microbiol 2006, 8:668-76. [108] Urban CF, Ermert D, Schmid M, Abu-Abed U, Goosmann C, Nacken W, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 2009, 5:e1000639. [109] Bianchi M, Hakkim A, Brinkmann V, Siler U, Seger RA, Zychlinsky A, et al. Restoration of NET formation by gene therapy in CGD controls aspergillosis. Blood

[110] Springer DJ, Ren P, Raina R, Dong Y, Behr MJ, McEwen BF, et al. Extracellular fibrils of pathogenic yeast Cryptococcus gattii are important for ecological niche, murine

[111] Hakkim A, Furnrohr BG, Amann K, Laube B, Abed UA, Brinkmann V, et al. Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus

virulence and human neutrophil interactions. PLoS One 2010, 5:e10978.

nephritis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:9813-8.

program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J Cell Biol 2007, 176:231-41.

TLR2 and TLR6 knockout mice. Microbiol Immunol 2003, 47:327-36.

 Science 2004, 303:1532-5.

mice. Trends in immunology 2001, 22:78-83.

Neuroscience 2010, 30:6036-47.

Trends Immunol 2009, 30:513-21.

Cell Death Differ 2011, 18:581-8.

RodA. PLoS Pathog 2010, 6:e1000873.

2010, 191:677-91.

2009, 114:2619-22.

[96] Kaisho T, Akira S. Dendritic-cell function in Toll-like receptor- and MyD88-knockout mice. Trends in immunology 2001, 22:78-83.

64 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

[81] Yamashiro S, Kawakami K, Uezu K, Kinjo T, Miyagi K, Nakamura K, et al. Lower expression of Th1-related cytokines and inducible nitric oxide synthase in mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes mellitus infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

[82] Graves DT, Naguib G, Lu H, Leone C, Hsue H, Krall E. Inflammation is More Persistent

[83] Strandberg L, Verdrengh M, Enge M, Andersson N, Amu S, +ûnnheim K, et al. Mice Chronically Fed High-Fat Diet Have Increased Mortality and Disturbed Immune

[84] Brun-Buisson C. The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive

[85] Wagenlehner FME, Pilatz A, Weidner W. UrosepsisГÇöfrom the view of the urologist.

[86] Hagberg L, Engberg I, Freter R, Lam J, Olling S, Svanborg Ed+®n C. Ascending, unobstructed urinary tract infection in mice caused by pyelonephritogenic Escherichia

[87] Reid G, Chan RC, Bruce AW, Costerton JW. Prevention of urinary tract infection in rats with an indigenous Lactobacillus casei strain. Infection and Immunity 1985, 49:320-4. [88] Stewart D, Fulton WB, Wilson C, Monitto CL, Paidas CN, Reeves RH, et al. Genetic Contribution to the Septic Response in A Mouse Model. Shock 2002, 18:342-7. [89] Wang H, Laskowitz DT, Sullivan PM, Christensen DJ. APOE genotype affects outcome in a murine model of sepsis: implications for a new treatment strategy. Anaesthesia and

[90] Zhang SH, Reddick RL, Piedrahita JA, Maeda N. Spontaneous hypercholesterolemia and arterial lesions in mice lacking apolipoprotein E. Science 1992, 258:468-71. [91] Grainger DJ, Reckless J, McKilligin E. Apolipoprotein E Modulates Clearance of Apoptotic Bodies In Vitro and In Vivo, Resulting in a Systemic Proinflammatory State in Apolipoprotein E-Deficient Mice. The Journal of Immunology 2004, 173:6366-75. [92] de Bont N, Netea MG, Demacker PNM, Verschueren I, Kullberg BJ, van Dijk KW, et al. Apolipoprotein E knock-out mice are highly susceptible to endotoxemia and Klebsiella

[93] Haraguchi G, Kosuge H, Maejima Y, Suzuki JI, Imai T, Yoshida M, et al. Pioglitazone reduces systematic inflammation and improves mortality in apolipoprotein E knockout

[94] Gao XP, Liu Q, Broman M, Predescu D, Frey RS, Malik AB. Inactivation of CD11b in a mouse transgenic model protects against sepsis-induced lung PMN infiltration and

[95] Wu Z, Sawamura T, Kurdowska AK, Ji HL, Idell S, Fu J. LOX-1 Deletion Improves Neutrophil Responses, Enhances Bacterial Clearance, and Reduces Lung Injury in a

Murine Polymicrobial Sepsis Model. Infection and Immunity 2011, 79:2865-70.

Clinical & Experimental Immunology 2005, 139:57-64.

Response in Sepsis. PLoS ONE 2009, 4:e7605.

Care Medicine 2000, 26 Suppl 1:S64-S74.

Intensive Care 2009, 37:38-45.

in Type 1 Diabetic Mice. Journal of Dental Research 2005, 84:324-8.

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2011, 38 Suppl 0:51-7.

coli of human origin. Infection and Immunity 1983, 40:273-83.

pneumoniae infection. Journal of Lipid Research 1999, 40:680-5.

mice with sepsis. Intensive Care Medicine 2008, 34:1304-12.

vascular injury. Physiological Genomics 2005, 21:230-42.

[112] Buchanan JT, Simpson AJ, Aziz RK, Liu GY, Kristian SA, Kotb M, et al. DNase expression allows the pathogen group A Streptococcus to escape killing in neutrophil extracellular traps. Curr Biol 2006, 16:396-400.

Experimental Sepsis Models 67

[127] Semeraro F, Ammollo CT, Morrissey JH, Dale GL, Friese P, Esmon NL, et al. Extracellular histones promote thrombin generation through platelet-dependent

[129] Xu J, Zhang X, Pelayo R, Monestier M, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, et al. Extracellular

[130] Marshall CJ, Nallaratnam M, Mocatta T, Smyth D, Richards M, Elliott JM, et al. Factors influencing local and systemic levels of plasma myeloperoxidase in ST-segment

[131] Baldus S, Eiserich JP, Mani A, Castro L, Figueroa M, Chumley P, et al. Endothelial transcytosis of myeloperoxidase confers specificity to vascular ECM proteins as targets

[132] Keshari RS, Jyoti A, Kumar S, Dubey M, Verma A, Srinag BS, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain mitochondrial as well as nuclear DNA and exhibit

[133] Wartha F, Beiter K, Normark S, Henriques-Normark B. Neutrophil extracellular traps:

[135] Xu J, Zhang X, Monestier M, Esmon NL, Esmon CT. Extracellular histones are mediators of death through TLR2 and TLR4 in mouse fatal liver injury. J Immunol 2011,

[136] Lorente JA, Marshall JC. Neutralization of tumor necrosis factor in preclinical models

[137] Hinshaw LB, Tekamp-Olson P, Chang AC, Lee PA, Taylor FB, Jr., Murray CK, et al. Survival of primates in LD100 septic shock following therapy with antibody to tumor

[138] Lay AJ, Donahue D, Tsai MJ, Castellino FJ. Acute inflammation is exacerbated in mice genetically predisposed to a severe protein C deficiency. Blood 2007, 109:1984-91. [139] Maderazo EG, Breaux S, Woronick CL, Krause PJ. Efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of pentoxifylline and its analogs in experimental Staphylococcus

[140] Teti G, Mancuso G, Cusumano V, Blandino G, Fera MT, Carbone M. Effects of anticytokine treatments in neonatal sepsis models. J Chemother 1995, 7 Suppl 4:96-8. [141] Mancuso G, Cusumano V, Cook JA, Smith E, Squadrito F, Blandino G, et al. Efficacy of tumor necrosis factor +¦ and eicosanoid inhibitors in experimental models of neonatal

[142] Freudenberg MA, Galanos C. Tumor necrosis factor alpha mediates lethal activity of killed gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria in D-galactosamine-treated mice. Infect

aureus infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1990, 34:1100-6.

sepsis. FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology 1994, 9:49-54.

mechanisms: involvement of platelet TLR2 and TLR4. Blood 2011, 118:1952-61. [128] Semeraro N, Ammollo CT, Semeraro F, Colucci M. Sepsis, thrombosis and organ

histones are major mediators of death in sepsis. Nat Med 2009, 15:1318-21.

elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2010, 106:316-22.

casting the NET over pathogenesis. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007, 10:52-6. [134] Esmon CT. Extracellular histones zap platelets. Blood 2011, 118:3456-7.

dysfunction. Thromb Res 2012, 129:290-5.

of tyrosine nitration. J Clin Invest 2001, 108:1759-70.

inflammatory potential. Cytometry A 2012, 81:238-47.

necrosis factor (TNF alpha). Circ Shock 1990, 30:279-92.

of sepsis. Shock 2005, 24 Suppl 1:107-19.

187:2626-31.

Immun 1991, 59:2110-5.

[127] Semeraro F, Ammollo CT, Morrissey JH, Dale GL, Friese P, Esmon NL, et al. Extracellular histones promote thrombin generation through platelet-dependent mechanisms: involvement of platelet TLR2 and TLR4. Blood 2011, 118:1952-61.

66 Sepsis – An Ongoing and Significant Challenge

traps. Curr Biol 2006, 16:401-7.

Med 2007, 13:463-9.

Rheum Dis 2007, 66:560-1.

107:15880-5.

92.

extracellular traps. Curr Biol 2006, 16:396-400.

fumigatus. Microbes Infect 2010, 12:928-36.

erythematosus. Autoimmun Rev 2008, 7:359-63.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:6388-93.

[112] Buchanan JT, Simpson AJ, Aziz RK, Liu GY, Kristian SA, Kotb M, et al. DNase expression allows the pathogen group A Streptococcus to escape killing in neutrophil

[113] Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al.

[114] Beiter K, Wartha F, Albiger B, Normark S, Zychlinsky A, Henriques-Normark B. An endonuclease allows Streptococcus pneumoniae to escape from neutrophil extracellular

[115] Guimaraes-Costa AB, Nascimento MT, Froment GS, Soares RP, Morgado FN, Conceicao-Silva F, et al. Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes induce and are killed

[117] McCormick A, Heesemann L, Wagener J, Marcos V, Hartl D, Loeffler J, et al. NETs formed by human neutrophils inhibit growth of the pathogenic mold Aspergillus

[118] Clark SR, Ma AC, Tavener SA, McDonald B, Goodarzi Z, Kelly MM, et al. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat

[119] Martinez VF, Balada E, Ordi-Ros J, Vilardell-Tarres M. DNase 1 and systemic lupus

[120] Tew MB, Johnson RW, Reveille JD, Tan FK. A molecular analysis of the low serum deoxyribonuclease activity in lupus patients. Arthritis Rheum 2001, 44:2446-7. [121] Balada E, Ordi-Ros J, Hernanz S, Villarreal J, Cortes F, Vilardell-Tarres M, et al. DNASE I mutation and systemic lupus erythematosus in a Spanish population:

[122] Bodano A, Gonzalez A, Balada E, Ordi J, Carreira P, Gomez-Reino JJ, et al. Study of DNASE I gene polymorphisms in systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility. Ann

[123] Napirei M, Wulf S, Mannherz HG. Chromatin breakdown during necrosis by serum

[124] Fuchs TA, Brill A, Duerschmied D, Schatzberg D, Monestier M, Myers DD, Jr., et al. Extracellular DNA traps promote thrombosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010,

[125] Kannemeier C, Shibamiya A, Nakazawa F, Trusheim H, Ruppert C, Markart P, et al. Extracellular RNA constitutes a natural procoagulant cofactor in blood coagulation.

[126] Shak S, Capon DJ, Hellmiss R, Marsters SA, Baker CL. Recombinant human DNase I reduces the viscosity of cystic fibrosis sputum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1990, 87:9188-

by neutrophil extracellular traps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:6748-53. [116] Ramos-Kichik V, Mondragon-Flores R, Mondragon-Castelan M, Gonzalez-Pozos S, Muniz-Hernandez S, Rojas-Espinosa O, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps are induced

by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb ) 2009, 89:29-37.

comment on the article by Tew et al. Arthritis Rheum 2002, 46:1974-6.

Dnase1 and the plasminogen system. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:1873-83.

 Science 2004, 303:1532-5.

[143] Papasian CJ, Silverstein R, Gao JJ, Bamberger DM, Morrison DC. Anomalous Role of Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha in Experimental Enterococcal Infection. Infection and Immunity 2002, 70:6628-37.

Experimental Sepsis Models 69

[158] Northern AL, Rutter SM, Peterson CM. Cyclic changes in the concentrations of peripheral blood immune cells during the normal menstrual cycle. Proc Soc Exp Biol

[159] Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, Ressler J, Muzzin A, Knoblich B, et al. Early Goal-Directed Therapy in the Treatment of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. N Engl J Med

[160] Natanson C, Danner RL, Reilly JM, Doerfler ML, Hoffman WD, Akin GL, et al. Antibiotics versus cardiovascular support in a canine model of human septic shock. American Journal of Physiology - Heart and Circulatory Physiology 1990, 259:H1440-

[161] Ondiveeran HK, Fox- Robichaud AE. Pentastarch in a Balanced Solution Reduces Hepatic Leukocyte Recruitment in Early Sepsis. Microcirculation 2004, 11:679-87. [162] Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for

[163] Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized

[164] Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA 1996,

[165] Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol

[166] Bebarta V, Luyten D, Heard K. Emergency medicine animal research: does use of randomization and blinding affect the results? Acad Emerg Med 2003, 10:684-7. [167] Piper RD, Cook DJ, Bone RC, Sibbald WJ. Introducing Critical Appraisal to studies of animal models investigating novel therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med 1996, 24:2059-70. [168] Lamontagne F, Briel M, Duffett M, Fox-Robichaud A, Cook DJ, Guyatt G, et al. Systematic review of reviews including animal studies addressing therapeutic

[169] Kilkenny C, Parsons N, Kadyszewski E, Festing MF, Cuthill IC, Fry D, et al. Survey of the quality of experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using

[170] Chalmers TC, Celano P, Sacks HS, Smith H, Jr. Bias in treatment assignment in

[171] Sacks H, Chalmers TC, Smith H, Jr. Randomized versus historical controls for clinical

[172] Colditz GA, Miller JN, Mosteller F. How study design affects outcomes in

reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg 2011, 9:672-7.

trials. Ann Intern Med 2001, 134:657-62.

interventions for sepsis. Crit Care Med 2010, 38:2401-8.

controlled clinical trials. N Engl J Med 1983, 309:1358-61.

comparisons of therapy. I: Medical. Stat Med 1989, 8:441-54.

animals. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7824.

trials. Am J Med 1982, 72:233-40.

Med 1994, 207:81-8.

2001, 345:1368-77.

H1447.

276:637-9.

2010, 8:e1000412.