**5. Conclusions**

In this study, we presented data on the seasonal variations of energy fluxes, climatic variables, GPP, ET and WUE for different tropical biomes in Brazil. Furthermore, correlations between observed carbon exchange data and remotely sensed data were also assessed. Results showed that GPP and ET responses to meteorological variables (solar radiation, air temperature, precipitation and VPD) are in phase, suggesting that this meteorological variability controls photosynthesis and ET in a similar fashion on a monthly scale, despite both direct and inverse relationships having been found depending on the type of environment. Based on our results, our study concludes that inconsistent MODIS GPP estimates for some months and sites indicate that the parametrizations used in the MOD17A2H GPP algorithm (such as FPAR) may need to be enhanced over certain land covers in order to improve estimates. WUE in the studied sites varied annually from 0.95 to 5.79 gC kg−1 H2O, with minimum and maximum values differing from usually found values for other environments worldwide. This study will aid future studies regarding the influence of global warming and water stress on carbon and water fluxes in similar tropical forests.

**Author Contributions:** In the present research article the individual contributions was followed by: Conceptualization, G.B.C., K.R.M., C.M.S.e.S. and B.G.B.; methodology, G.B.C., K.R.M., L.B.V., G.V.A., P.R.M., T.V.M. and R.R.F.; software, G.B.C., K.R.M., L.B.V., G.V.A., T.V.M. and R.R.F.; validation, J.G.M.d.S., T.T.A.T.N., P.R.M., H.G.G.C.N., L.V.P. and R.A.S.S.; formal analysis, G.B.C., K.R.M., C.M.S.e.S., J.G.M.d.S., B.G.B., A.S.S., C.P.O., T.R.R., J.B.S., W.A.G., and S.C.; investigation, G.B.C., K.R.M., T.R.R., H.J.D., C.M.S.e.S. and B.G.B.; resources, G.B.C., B.G.B. and H.J.D.; data curation, G.B.C., K.R.M., T.R.R., J.B.S., L.B.V. and G.V.A.; writing—original draft preparation, G.B.C., K.R.M., J.G.M.d.S., C.M.S.e.S. and B.G.B.; writing—review and editing, T.V.M., T.T.A.T.N., P.R.M., C.P.O., A.S.S.,T.R.R., J.B.S., C.P.O., W.A.G., S.C. and M.U.G.A.; visualization, G.B.C., K.R.M. and C.M.S.e.S.; supervision, G.B.C., K.R.M., C.M.S.e.S. and T.R.R.; project administration, H.J.D., C.M.S.e.S. and B.G.B.; funding acquisition, G.B.C., H.J.D., C.M.S.e.S. and B.G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

**Funding:** The authors are also thankful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) for the postdoctoral funding granted to KRM and to the National Council for Scientifc and Technological Development (CNPq) for the research productivity grant of C.M.S.e.S. (Process n◦ 303802/2017-0), the financial support of CNPq, through undergraduate research project (PIBIC-UFOPA for L.B.V. and G.V.A.) and the project NOWCDCB: National Observatory of Water and Carbon Dynamics in the Caatinga Biome (INCT-MCTI/CNPq/CAPES/FAPs 16/2014, grant: 465764/2014-2) and (MCTI/CNPq N◦ 28/2018, grant 420854/2018-5). The APC was funded by PAPCIQ–UFOPA.

**Data Availability Statement:** Not applicable.

**Acknowledgments:** The authors are thankful to AMERIFLUX and LBA project for provide free access to the EC data used in this study.

**Conflicts of Interest:** The authors declare no conflict of interest and the funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.


Preface

Globally, human papillomavirus (HPV) is one the most sexually transmitted infectious agents. About 5% of all cancers are attributed to HPV with enormous cases of cervical and other sites of cancers. Global epidemiological and virological studies may help to understand the origin, evolution, carcinogenesis, and immunopathogenesis of HPV, which divulge the opportunities to effectively treat and prevent the global disease burden of HPV. The most prevalent HPV types (16 and 18) are responsible for 70% of cervical cancers, including precancerous cervical lesions. Identification of precancerous lesions during the screening of HPV cases allows us to effectively treat disease progression and combats at least 80% of cervical cancer cases in developed countries. However, the limited access of preventive measures in developing countries often results in poor early detection and treatment. In addition, the scarcity of advanced levels of treatment during later stages of infection is limited, which results in a higher morbidity profile.

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus* covers a collection of articles by brilliant researchers who have devoted their time to combat HPV. This book gives a comprehensive overview of recent advances in HPV, as well as general concepts of molecular biology of HPV infections, epidemiology, immunopathology, prevention, and current clinical recommendations in the management of HPV. It examines novel insights into future directions in the prevention and therapeutic strategies that control HPV infection in developed and developing countries. The book also focuses on various aspects and properties of HPV, whose deep understanding is very important for safeguarding the human race from further loss of resources and economies due to pathogens. This book aims to target the interdisciplinary experts of medicines, including researchers, gynecologists, pathologists, microbiologists, oncologists, healthcare physicians, epidemiologists, policy makers, and funding agencies. This book will be a part of the book series "Infectious Diseases," series editor Shailendra K. Saxena.

I anticipate that this work will augment attention in this field of research and prospective readers will irrefutably find it useful for their clinical usage, management, and further exploration. I would like to thank our contributors, colleagues, family, and friends who gave us a lot of encouragement and support during the production of this book.

**II**

**Section 5**

Women in Western Kazakhstan

*Olzhas Urazayev and Elnara Ismagulova*

Prevention of Human Papillomavirus **109**

**Chapter 7 111**

Results of a Survey Concerning Cervical Cancer Risk Factors among

*by Saule Balmagambetova, Arip Koyshybaev, Kanshaiym Sakiyeva,*

**Dr. Shailendra K. Saxena** Vice Dean and Professor, Centre for Advance Research, King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, India

**1**

Section 1

Introduction

Section 1 Introduction

**3**

**1. Introduction**

**Chapter 1**

**Abstract**

Management

*Apjit Kaur and Madan LB Bhatt*

Recent Advances in Human

Papillomavirus Infection and

*Shailendra K. Saxena, Swatantra Kumar, Madhu Mati Goel,*

Human papillomavirus (HPV) accounts for approximately 4.5% of all cancers which differs at the level of economic development and geographical regions. The life cycle of the HPV is completely dependent on the epithelium differentiation without the involvement of cell death and systemic viremia. Carcinogenesis is the consequence of viral gene expression, dysregulated cell proliferation, and genomic instability. Keratinocytes are the target cell for HPV which act as the physical and immunological barrier. In cervical carcinogenesis, the enhanced level of Th17 infiltration has been observed which increases with the disease progression and is coupled with CCL20 expression in the stromal mesenchymal compartment. IL-6 and M-CSF are known as "switch factors" which are imperative for pro-tumorigenic response in monocytes. Screening of cervical cancer includes three major procedures: cytology, nucleic acid test, and co-testing. For evaluating anal lesions, high-resolution anoscopy is performed which is similar to colposcopy. Prophylactic vaccination is the primary preventive measure to control the HrHPV infection and reduce the burden of HPV-related cancer. The precancerous stage of HPV infection includes excision, ablation, and immunotherapy. Radiotherapy is the acceptable primary treatment for the early stage of anogenital cancer, whereas for the

advanced-stage metastatic cancer, palliative therapy is the only option.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) attributes to approximately 4.5% of all cancers which differs at the level of economic development and geographical regions [1]. *Papillomaviridae* family comprises of more than 200 types of HPV which are classified into five genera: *Alphapapillomavirus*, *Betapapillomavirus*, *Gammapapillomavirus*, *Mupapillomavirus*, and *Nupapillomavirus* [2]. All the genera are responsible for the various types of HPV-associated cancers. Furthermore, on the basis of oncogenicity, the mucosal type (alpha) is grouped into two subtypes which are low risk (LR), HPV 6 and HPV 11, which are known to cause benign genital warts and high-risk (HR) cervical cancer [3]. HPV 6 and HPV 11 are also known to cause respiratory papillomatosis predominantly in children [4]. According to IARC classification, high-risk HPV (HrHPV) is of 14 types: HPV 16, HPV 18, HPV 31, HPV 33,

**Keywords:** HPV, infection, management, prevention

### **Chapter 1**

## Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management

*Shailendra K. Saxena, Swatantra Kumar, Madhu Mati Goel, Apjit Kaur and Madan LB Bhatt*

### **Abstract**

Human papillomavirus (HPV) accounts for approximately 4.5% of all cancers which differs at the level of economic development and geographical regions. The life cycle of the HPV is completely dependent on the epithelium differentiation without the involvement of cell death and systemic viremia. Carcinogenesis is the consequence of viral gene expression, dysregulated cell proliferation, and genomic instability. Keratinocytes are the target cell for HPV which act as the physical and immunological barrier. In cervical carcinogenesis, the enhanced level of Th17 infiltration has been observed which increases with the disease progression and is coupled with CCL20 expression in the stromal mesenchymal compartment. IL-6 and M-CSF are known as "switch factors" which are imperative for pro-tumorigenic response in monocytes. Screening of cervical cancer includes three major procedures: cytology, nucleic acid test, and co-testing. For evaluating anal lesions, high-resolution anoscopy is performed which is similar to colposcopy. Prophylactic vaccination is the primary preventive measure to control the HrHPV infection and reduce the burden of HPV-related cancer. The precancerous stage of HPV infection includes excision, ablation, and immunotherapy. Radiotherapy is the acceptable primary treatment for the early stage of anogenital cancer, whereas for the advanced-stage metastatic cancer, palliative therapy is the only option.

**Keywords:** HPV, infection, management, prevention

### **1. Introduction**

Human papillomavirus (HPV) attributes to approximately 4.5% of all cancers which differs at the level of economic development and geographical regions [1]. *Papillomaviridae* family comprises of more than 200 types of HPV which are classified into five genera: *Alphapapillomavirus*, *Betapapillomavirus*, *Gammapapillomavirus*, *Mupapillomavirus*, and *Nupapillomavirus* [2]. All the genera are responsible for the various types of HPV-associated cancers. Furthermore, on the basis of oncogenicity, the mucosal type (alpha) is grouped into two subtypes which are low risk (LR), HPV 6 and HPV 11, which are known to cause benign genital warts and high-risk (HR) cervical cancer [3]. HPV 6 and HPV 11 are also known to cause respiratory papillomatosis predominantly in children [4]. According to IARC classification, high-risk HPV (HrHPV) is of 14 types: HPV 16, HPV 18, HPV 31, HPV 33, HPV 35, HPV 39, HPV 45, HPV 51, HPV 52, HPV 56, HPV 58, HPV 59, HPV 66, and HPV 68 [5]. High-risk papillomavirus is responsible for causing cancer related to the cervix, vulva, vagina, anus, penis, and oropharynx [6]. HPV 16 and HPV 18 represent approximately 60% for adenocarcinoma of the endocervix (ADC-CX), and both are equally associated with 15% of adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the endocervix [7]. Among the HrHPV, HPV 16 is the most efficient in evading the host immune response and responsible for persistent infection in the oropharynx, an imperative step in development of malignant lesion [8]. The mucosal HPV is transmitted by sexual contacts, and the transformation zone in females is characterized as the area adjacent to the border of the ecto- and endocervix which are the preferential sites of primary infection [9]. Approximately 80% of the sexually active women get HPV infection where most of them are asymptomatic with the immune system-mediated clearance of infection within 6–12 months [10]. With the impairment of immune function, the infection becomes symptomatic in a small number of individuals. Persistent infection of HPV and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after the period of latency may lead to the regression or progression toward the development of invasive carcinoma [11]. The prevalence of HPV infection is higher in immunocompromised individuals such as HIV [12] and organ transplant recipients (OTRs) [13] suggesting the role of T cell in the clearance of HPV. Other factors including smoking, parity, sexual habits, genetic factors, oral-contraceptives have shown to increase the risk of progression of HPV-driven diseases [14].

Beta genus of HPV principally accounts for progression of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The association of beta HPV types with skin cancer can be explained as the prevalence of epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV). Patients diagnosed with EV are highly susceptible for HPV beta-type infection which results in flat warts and pityriasis versicolor-like lesions [15]. With the advancement detection methods, beta HPV types have been shown to be abundantly present in the skin of the asymptomatic HPV-infected individuals. So far, 43 HPV of beta genus have been isolated. Furthermore, beta HPV types have been speculated as HPV facilitates the accumulation of ultraviolet-mediated DNA damage [16]. In order to prevent the disease, the neutralizing antibody (nAb) has been shown to provide protection. However, immunization with attenuated or killed pathogen is imperative.

### **2. Global HPV epidemiology**

The global burden of HPV-driven cervical cancer accounts for approximately 630,000 cases annually [1] where five other HPV-associated sites of cancer are responsible for further 113,400 cases [17]. In spite of the availability of several preventive strategies, HPV subtypes cause worldwide morbidity and mortality particularly in the less developed countries (**Figure 1**) [18]. Asia contributes to the immense majority of cervical cancer cases of 285,000 with 144,000 deaths followed by Africa where 99,000 cases with 60,000 deaths and America with 83,000 newer cases with 36,000 deaths. Asia, China, and India contribute to 62,000 and 123,000 cases along with 30,000 and 67,000 deaths, respectively [19]. Data from the meta-analysis and systemic reviews are suggesting that the vast majority of the infection is asymptomatic and transient. The incidence of HPV infection particularly cervical cancer is higher in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [20]. The worldwide distribution of age-specific HPV infection also varies with the predominance in young women of age less than 25 years in Europe and America [21]. However, in Africa and Asia no significant decline with the age has been observed. 3.2% of HPV 16 infected women shows normal cytology [22]. Cervical precancerous lesion is an imperative factor for HPV prevalence where HPV is detected in 52.5%

**5**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

of ascus lesion, 74.8% of low-grade cervical lesions, and 88.9% of high-grade cervical lesions. HPV 16 has been detected in 19.3% of low- and 45.1% of highgrade cervical lesions [23]. Furthermore, anal HPV infection is the most frequent HPV infection of other anogenital areas. The global burden of anogenital cancers caused by HPV is very high where 88% of anal and <50% of cases attribute to the lower genital tract [24]. About 30,000 cases are reported in men with the 56.56% attributed to the anus and 43.33% to penile origin. In the case of women, 38,500 cases are reported with 46.75% cases attributed to the anus, 22% to the vulva, and 31.16% from the vaginal origin [1]. Furthermore, the predominance of anal HPV infection that has been observed in the men sex with men (MSM) is 58.8% or HIVinfected individuals. The oral HPV infection significantly differs by gender and with higher incidence in men [19]. The worldwide prevalence of HPV-associated head and neck cancer is 8.15%, that is, 37,200 cases, where 77.95% of cases belong to the oropharynx, 11.82% of cases correspond to the oral cavity, and 10.21% of

Human papillomavirus is a histone-bound double-stranded DNA virus of ~8 kb with either eight or nine open reading frames (ORFs) on the same DNA strand. HPV genome can be subdivided into three regions: coding region comprises of early genes such as E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7; region encoding major (L1) and minor (L2) capsid proteins; and a noncoding region present between ORFs L1 and E6 known as long control region (LCR), involving in viral DNA replication and transcriptional regulation [25]. HPV genome is highly conserved; however, exclusive features are represented by different genera. As compared with the mucosal HPV types, beta HPV genome is relatively shorter due to reduced size of LCR (400 bp) which ranges from 7.4–7.7 kb, whereas the E2 ORF is relatively larger in beta HPV types (**Figure 2**) [26]. Apart from this, most of the beta HPV types lack E5 gene with the exception of HPV 14 [27]. An additional early protein, E8Ê2C, is expressed exclusively by some of the HrHPV types as HPV 16, HPV 18, and HPV 31 that repress the expression of viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 following proliferation [28].

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

*Worldwide prevalence of HPV (n = 1938) [adapted from ref. 18].*

cases correspond to the larynx [1].

**Figure 1.**

**3. HPV genome and replication**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

HPV 35, HPV 39, HPV 45, HPV 51, HPV 52, HPV 56, HPV 58, HPV 59, HPV 66, and HPV 68 [5]. High-risk papillomavirus is responsible for causing cancer related to the cervix, vulva, vagina, anus, penis, and oropharynx [6]. HPV 16 and HPV 18 represent approximately 60% for adenocarcinoma of the endocervix (ADC-CX), and both are equally associated with 15% of adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) of the endocervix [7]. Among the HrHPV, HPV 16 is the most efficient in evading the host immune response and responsible for persistent infection in the oropharynx, an imperative step in development of malignant lesion [8]. The mucosal HPV is transmitted by sexual contacts, and the transformation zone in females is characterized as the area adjacent to the border of the ecto- and endocervix which are the preferential sites of primary infection [9]. Approximately 80% of the sexually active women get HPV infection where most of them are asymptomatic with the immune system-mediated clearance of infection within 6–12 months [10]. With the impairment of immune function, the infection becomes symptomatic in a small number of individuals. Persistent infection of HPV and the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) after the period of latency may lead to the regression or progression toward the development of invasive carcinoma [11]. The prevalence of HPV infection is higher in immunocompromised individuals such as HIV [12] and organ transplant recipients (OTRs) [13] suggesting the role of T cell in the clearance of HPV. Other factors including smoking, parity, sexual habits, genetic factors, oral-contraceptives

have shown to increase the risk of progression of HPV-driven diseases [14]. Beta genus of HPV principally accounts for progression of nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The association of beta HPV types with skin cancer can be explained as the prevalence of epidermodysplasia verruciformis (EV). Patients diagnosed with EV are highly susceptible for HPV beta-type infection which results in flat warts and pityriasis versicolor-like lesions [15]. With the advancement detection methods, beta HPV types have been shown to be abundantly present in the skin of the asymptomatic HPV-infected individuals. So far, 43 HPV of beta genus have been isolated. Furthermore, beta HPV types have been speculated as HPV facilitates the accumulation of ultraviolet-mediated DNA damage [16]. In order to prevent the disease, the neutralizing antibody (nAb) has been shown to provide protection.

However, immunization with attenuated or killed pathogen is imperative.

The global burden of HPV-driven cervical cancer accounts for approximately 630,000 cases annually [1] where five other HPV-associated sites of cancer are responsible for further 113,400 cases [17]. In spite of the availability of several preventive strategies, HPV subtypes cause worldwide morbidity and mortality particularly in the less developed countries (**Figure 1**) [18]. Asia contributes to the immense majority of cervical cancer cases of 285,000 with 144,000 deaths followed by Africa where 99,000 cases with 60,000 deaths and America with 83,000 newer cases with 36,000 deaths. Asia, China, and India contribute to 62,000 and 123,000 cases along with 30,000 and 67,000 deaths, respectively [19]. Data from the meta-analysis and systemic reviews are suggesting that the vast majority of the infection is asymptomatic and transient. The incidence of HPV infection particularly cervical cancer is higher in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) [20]. The worldwide distribution of age-specific HPV infection also varies with the predominance in young women of age less than 25 years in Europe and America [21]. However, in Africa and Asia no significant decline with the age has been observed. 3.2% of HPV 16 infected women shows normal cytology [22]. Cervical precancerous lesion is an imperative factor for HPV prevalence where HPV is detected in 52.5%

**2. Global HPV epidemiology**

**4**

**Figure 1.** *Worldwide prevalence of HPV (n = 1938) [adapted from ref. 18].*

of ascus lesion, 74.8% of low-grade cervical lesions, and 88.9% of high-grade cervical lesions. HPV 16 has been detected in 19.3% of low- and 45.1% of highgrade cervical lesions [23]. Furthermore, anal HPV infection is the most frequent HPV infection of other anogenital areas. The global burden of anogenital cancers caused by HPV is very high where 88% of anal and <50% of cases attribute to the lower genital tract [24]. About 30,000 cases are reported in men with the 56.56% attributed to the anus and 43.33% to penile origin. In the case of women, 38,500 cases are reported with 46.75% cases attributed to the anus, 22% to the vulva, and 31.16% from the vaginal origin [1]. Furthermore, the predominance of anal HPV infection that has been observed in the men sex with men (MSM) is 58.8% or HIVinfected individuals. The oral HPV infection significantly differs by gender and with higher incidence in men [19]. The worldwide prevalence of HPV-associated head and neck cancer is 8.15%, that is, 37,200 cases, where 77.95% of cases belong to the oropharynx, 11.82% of cases correspond to the oral cavity, and 10.21% of cases correspond to the larynx [1].

### **3. HPV genome and replication**

Human papillomavirus is a histone-bound double-stranded DNA virus of ~8 kb with either eight or nine open reading frames (ORFs) on the same DNA strand. HPV genome can be subdivided into three regions: coding region comprises of early genes such as E1, E2, E4, E5, E6, and E7; region encoding major (L1) and minor (L2) capsid proteins; and a noncoding region present between ORFs L1 and E6 known as long control region (LCR), involving in viral DNA replication and transcriptional regulation [25]. HPV genome is highly conserved; however, exclusive features are represented by different genera. As compared with the mucosal HPV types, beta HPV genome is relatively shorter due to reduced size of LCR (400 bp) which ranges from 7.4–7.7 kb, whereas the E2 ORF is relatively larger in beta HPV types (**Figure 2**) [26]. Apart from this, most of the beta HPV types lack E5 gene with the exception of HPV 14 [27]. An additional early protein, E8Ê2C, is expressed exclusively by some of the HrHPV types as HPV 16, HPV 18, and HPV 31 that repress the expression of viral oncoproteins E6 and E7 following proliferation [28].

Recently, three gamma HPV types (101, 103, and 108) have been isolated from the cervical specimens which lack the E6 ORF [29].

Epithelial abrasion is the typical site of HPV infection where the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix is susceptible to HPV transformation [9]. The life cycle of the HPV is completely dependent on the epithelium differentiation without the involvement of cell death and systemic viremia. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HPSGs) are exposed by the epithelial abrasion which is the binding site for L1 and defined as the extracellular event of HPV replication [30]. Upon binding the conformational changes in the capsid expose the N terminus of L2 which gets cleaved by extracellular furin, a prerequisite for the virus internalization [31]. Virus uptake is mediated by L1 and endosomal vesicles, following transport of endosomal virus to the nucleus along with the retromer. L1 is degraded, whereas L2 forms the complex with viral genome following the escape from endosome to the trans-Golgi networks [32]. L2 entry into the nucleus is dependent on the cell cycle progression and transpired upon transient nuclear membrane breakdown [33]. The L2 genome complex interacts with ND-10, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies following initiation of early viral transcripts [34]. The host DNA replication machinery system is utilized by the viral early proteins E1 and E2 to establish 50–100 episomal copies per cells [35]. Dependence on host DNA replication system is the reason for the slow rate of virus evolution due to proofreading mechanism. The productive phase of HPV life cycle exhibits a unique spatial and temporal regulation and differentiation of keratinocyte in squamous epithelium. Upon leaving the basal membrane, HPV enters into the productive phase of life cycle which can be characterized as high copy number (1000 copies per cell) of HPV genome along with

**7**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

the late viral capsid expression for assembly transpired only in the upper terminally

Several of the host factors also play an imperative role in HPV replication where HPV drives the keratinocytes into S phase of the cell cycle mediated by E5, E6, and E7 viral oncoproteins [37]. E5 increases the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which promotes the progression toward G1 phase [38]. E6 mediates proteasomal degradation upon binding with p53, a PDZ protein to promote de-differentiation of cells and other pro-apoptotic factors to promote the cell survival [39]. Moreover, MYC expression and telomerase get activated by E6 protein [40]. E7 protein is known to bind with multiple targets specifically RB to overcome the restriction points [41]. Primary keratinocytes get immortalized due to ectopic expression of E6 and E7 which also induces the genomic instability [42]. Carcinogenesis is the consequence of viral gene expression, dysregulated cell proliferation, and genomic

instability; however, the progression of cancer is not beneficial to the virus.

The skin and mucosal surfaces act as the first line of defense during infection; however, cutaneous and mucosal HPV are known to diminish the recognition process mediated by TLR9 [43]. Mucosal HPV is known to inhibit the IFN signaling and expression which is mediated by both E6 and E7. HPV E6 protein interacts with IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) [44], whereas E7 interferes with pro-apoptotic factor IRF1 and antiviral [45]. Keratinocytes are the target cell for HPV which act as the physical and immunological barrier. The activation of inflammasome in keratinocytes by other DNA viruses results in acute inflammatory responses; however, diminished inflammatory response has been observed in mucosal HPV infection. Mucosal HPV oncoproteins are responsible for abrogated posttranslational modification and secretion of IL-1β via targeting p300/CBP-associated factors/NF-κB pathway [46]. Upon infection the epithelial cells release chemotactic factors for recruiting, differentiation, and activation of Langerhans cells which are the professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). HPV infection interferes with homeostasis of Langerhans cells in the

**4. Immunopathogenesis during HPV infection**

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

differentiated epithelial layer (**Figure 3**) [36].

**Figure 3.** *HPV life cycle.*

**Figure 2.** *HPV genome.*

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

cervical specimens which lack the E6 ORF [29].

Recently, three gamma HPV types (101, 103, and 108) have been isolated from the

Epithelial abrasion is the typical site of HPV infection where the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix is susceptible to HPV transformation [9]. The life cycle of the HPV is completely dependent on the epithelium differentiation without the involvement of cell death and systemic viremia. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HPSGs) are exposed by the epithelial abrasion which is the binding site for L1 and defined as the extracellular event of HPV replication [30]. Upon binding the conformational changes in the capsid expose the N terminus of L2 which gets cleaved by extracellular furin, a prerequisite for the virus internalization [31]. Virus uptake is mediated by L1 and endosomal vesicles, following transport of endosomal virus to the nucleus along with the retromer. L1 is degraded, whereas L2 forms the complex with viral genome following the escape from endosome to the trans-Golgi networks [32]. L2 entry into the nucleus is dependent on the cell cycle progression and transpired upon transient nuclear membrane breakdown [33]. The L2 genome complex interacts with ND-10, a promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies following initiation of early viral transcripts [34]. The host DNA replication machinery system is utilized by the viral early proteins E1 and E2 to establish 50–100 episomal copies per cells [35]. Dependence on host DNA replication system is the reason for the slow rate of virus evolution due to proofreading mechanism. The productive phase of HPV life cycle exhibits a unique spatial and temporal regulation and differentiation of keratinocyte in squamous epithelium. Upon leaving the basal membrane, HPV enters into the productive phase of life cycle which can be characterized as high copy number (1000 copies per cell) of HPV genome along with

**6**

**Figure 2.** *HPV genome.* the late viral capsid expression for assembly transpired only in the upper terminally differentiated epithelial layer (**Figure 3**) [36].

Several of the host factors also play an imperative role in HPV replication where HPV drives the keratinocytes into S phase of the cell cycle mediated by E5, E6, and E7 viral oncoproteins [37]. E5 increases the expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) which promotes the progression toward G1 phase [38]. E6 mediates proteasomal degradation upon binding with p53, a PDZ protein to promote de-differentiation of cells and other pro-apoptotic factors to promote the cell survival [39]. Moreover, MYC expression and telomerase get activated by E6 protein [40]. E7 protein is known to bind with multiple targets specifically RB to overcome the restriction points [41]. Primary keratinocytes get immortalized due to ectopic expression of E6 and E7 which also induces the genomic instability [42]. Carcinogenesis is the consequence of viral gene expression, dysregulated cell proliferation, and genomic instability; however, the progression of cancer is not beneficial to the virus.

### **4. Immunopathogenesis during HPV infection**

The skin and mucosal surfaces act as the first line of defense during infection; however, cutaneous and mucosal HPV are known to diminish the recognition process mediated by TLR9 [43]. Mucosal HPV is known to inhibit the IFN signaling and expression which is mediated by both E6 and E7. HPV E6 protein interacts with IFN regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) [44], whereas E7 interferes with pro-apoptotic factor IRF1 and antiviral [45]. Keratinocytes are the target cell for HPV which act as the physical and immunological barrier. The activation of inflammasome in keratinocytes by other DNA viruses results in acute inflammatory responses; however, diminished inflammatory response has been observed in mucosal HPV infection. Mucosal HPV oncoproteins are responsible for abrogated posttranslational modification and secretion of IL-1β via targeting p300/CBP-associated factors/NF-κB pathway [46]. Upon infection the epithelial cells release chemotactic factors for recruiting, differentiation, and activation of Langerhans cells which are the professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs). HPV infection interferes with homeostasis of Langerhans cells in the

epidermal compartment. Low levels of chemokines (CCL20 and CCL2) are mediated by HPV oncoproteins which result in the reduced level of APC recruitment toward the epithelium [47]. HPV infection during the progression of an invasive form of cancer results in expansion of epithelial stem cell compartments.

The increased level of stromal infiltration with the immune cells is associated with the increasing dysplasia. Secretion of chemoattractants is upregulated by HPVtransformed cells, specifically the CCL2 production by monocytes which attracts myelomonocytic cells following maintenance of inflammatory microenvironment via CCR-2 dependent pathway. Remarkably, CCL-2 secretion results in higher production of MMP-9 via intracellular Ca2+ signaling by monocytes [48]. MMP-9 has been shown to be involved in the progression toward malignancy where monocytes become infiltrating into high-grade cervical lesions. In cervical carcinogenesis, the enhanced level of Th17 infiltration has been observed which increases with the disease progression and is coupled with CCL20 expression in the stromal mesenchymal compartment [49]. Most importantly, IL-6 and monocyte colony-stimulating factors (M-CSF) are known as "switch factors" which are imperative for pro-tumorigenic response in monocytes and are highly upregulated during the late stage of human cervical cancer which results in activation of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway in monocytes [46]. In cervical cancer, inhibition of NF-κB in CD83+ dendritic cells is the consequence of the diminished CCR7 expression that leads to interrupted dendritic cell migration to the lymph node-homing chemokine. Antigen transport to the secondary lymphoid tissue by stromal dendritic cells gets impaired due to diminished CCR7 expression. Cervical cancer cell-derived IL-6 immobilizes the dendritic cells in the tumor stroma via suppression of CCR7 resulting in local MMP-9 production [50]. Furthermore, the low level of IFN-γ production by M2-polarized macrophages causes a reduced level of T-cell proliferation in cervical cancer stroma [51]. The programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1) is expressed by most of the CD8+ T cells in cervical cancer, and the suppressed cytotoxic cell response is probably due to M2-macrophages [52].

### **5. Diagnosis for HPV**

Screening of cervical cancer includes three major procedures: cytology (microscopic evaluations of sample acquired from cervical regions), nucleic acid test (detection of HrHPV DNA or RNA), and co-testing (combination of microscopy and nucleic acid test) [53]. In the clinical settings, some of the routine tests for HPV detection are biopsy, DNA-based test, Pap smear, colposcopy, and acetic acid test. Colposcopy is the clinical examination of the cervix, vagina, and vulva upon application of acetic acid solution which is known as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and is mostly coupled with biopsy of regions suspected of neoplasia [54]. Colposcopy findings are evaluated and represented on the basis of acetowhite lesion, mosaic pattern, punctuation, and surface contour [55]. Due to the higher chance of false-positive results, colposcopy screening is recommended for various conditions such as HIV-infected individuals, dyskaryosis, borderline nuclear change in endocervical cells, and cervical cytology positive for malignant [56].

For evaluating anal lesions, high-resolution anoscopy is performed which is similar to colposcopy. However, anoscopy is more complex since it requires manipulation to visualize the entire SCJ along with lower accuracy. High-resolution anoscopy is performed as a first-line test for HPV surveillance in MSM population to follow up anal cytological findings [57]. Histopathological evaluations are considered as the reference standards for deciding the treatment in precancerous or cancerous stages of HPV [58]. CIN3 is considered as the precancerous stage of the HPV infection and can be treated, whereas CIN1 is the morphological representation of HPV infection

**9**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

and cannot be treated [59]. The CIN2 lesions are considered as severe appearing HPV infection rather than a precancerous one. Several of the biomarkers have been developed to screen CIN2 form of HPV infection. p16 staining can be used to discriminate among the p16-positive CIN2 with CIN3 and p16-negative with CIN1 [60]. DNA-based test utilizes the principle of direct probe hybridization such as dot blot and Southern blot which are associated with disadvantages as low sensitivity and requirement of large amount of DNA sample. Currently, hybrid capture HPV DNA test 2 (HC2) and PCR-based test have been approved by the FDA [61]. HC2 test can be used to detect as low as 1 pg. of HPV DNA/ml and its sensitivity is comparable with PCR. HC2 can detect both low-risk (6, 11, 42, 43, 44) and high-risk (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68) HPV. PCR-based diagnosis of HPV is more accurate and robust as compared to the Pap smear test which is a screening test for HPV detection.

Prophylactic vaccination is the primary preventive measure to control the HrHPV infection and reduce the burden of HPV-related cancer [62]. Currently available vaccine for HPV comprises viruslike particles (VLPs) which is the major HPV coat protein L1. VLPs are noninfectious in nature which lacks DNA and have similar geometry to the native virus [63]. Currently, three prophylactic VLP vaccines have been licensed, namely, as the bivalent Cervarix, the nonavalent Gardasil, and the quadrivalent Gardasil [64]. Cervarix is based on the HPV 16 and HPV 18 antigens and proprietary adjuvants for enhancement of immunogenicity [65]. While Gardasil provides protection against wide range of HPV such as HPV 6, HPV 11, HPV 18, HPV 31, HPV 33, HPV 45, HPV 52, and HPV 52 [66]. All the vaccines are intended to provide complete protection against HPV if administered before the exposure and have been shown to be highly efficacious without any adverse effects. More than 64 countries have introduced the HPV vaccination program primarily targeting girls of age 9–13 and boys of higher age group [67]. In both males and females, systemic immunization with HPV vaccine results in higher amount of

antibody generation as 1–1000 times higher than the natural infection.

The management of HPV infection depends on the type and severity of the HPV infection. For the precancerous stage of HPV infection, it includes treatment strategies as excision, ablation, and immunotherapy. The gold standard for the management of HPV treatment is various excisional procedures of the transformation zone where the extent of excision depends on the lesion size [68]. Ablation procedures are less invasive and include cold coagulation, laser therapy, and cryotherapy with the disadvantage of procurement of tissue sample for confirmatory diagnosis. The immunotherapy has shown to be effective but is still present in the clinical trial stages [69]. Anogenital cancers are treated by radical local excision and by regional lymphadenectomy during the spread of infection to the lymphatic system [70]. During cervical cancer radical hysterectomy which is the removal of the whole uterus including the upper vagina and supporting ligaments along with excision of paracervical soft tissue is performed. Surgical intervention not only defines the involvement of lymph nodes but also suggests the treatment alternatives as radio-

Radiotherapy is the acceptable primary treatment for the early stage of anogenital cancer, whereas for the advanced-stage metastatic cancer, palliative therapy is the only option. In the recurrent cervical cancer, the antiangiogenic treatment such as bevacizumab along with cisplatin and paclitaxel can prolong the survival [71]. In case of invasive form of cervical cancer, treatment is based on surgery, brachytherapy, external beam radiation, and

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

**6. Prevention and treatment**

therapy and chemoradiotherapy.

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

and cannot be treated [59]. The CIN2 lesions are considered as severe appearing HPV infection rather than a precancerous one. Several of the biomarkers have been developed to screen CIN2 form of HPV infection. p16 staining can be used to discriminate among the p16-positive CIN2 with CIN3 and p16-negative with CIN1 [60]. DNA-based test utilizes the principle of direct probe hybridization such as dot blot and Southern blot which are associated with disadvantages as low sensitivity and requirement of large amount of DNA sample. Currently, hybrid capture HPV DNA test 2 (HC2) and PCR-based test have been approved by the FDA [61]. HC2 test can be used to detect as low as 1 pg. of HPV DNA/ml and its sensitivity is comparable with PCR. HC2 can detect both low-risk (6, 11, 42, 43, 44) and high-risk (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 68) HPV. PCR-based diagnosis of HPV is more accurate and robust as compared to the Pap smear test which is a screening test for HPV detection.

### **6. Prevention and treatment**

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

tion of MMP-9 via intracellular Ca2+

**5. Diagnosis for HPV**

epidermal compartment. Low levels of chemokines (CCL20 and CCL2) are mediated by HPV oncoproteins which result in the reduced level of APC recruitment toward the epithelium [47]. HPV infection during the progression of an invasive form of

The increased level of stromal infiltration with the immune cells is associated with the increasing dysplasia. Secretion of chemoattractants is upregulated by HPVtransformed cells, specifically the CCL2 production by monocytes which attracts myelomonocytic cells following maintenance of inflammatory microenvironment via CCR-2 dependent pathway. Remarkably, CCL-2 secretion results in higher produc-

shown to be involved in the progression toward malignancy where monocytes become infiltrating into high-grade cervical lesions. In cervical carcinogenesis, the enhanced level of Th17 infiltration has been observed which increases with the disease progression and is coupled with CCL20 expression in the stromal mesenchymal compartment [49]. Most importantly, IL-6 and monocyte colony-stimulating factors (M-CSF) are known as "switch factors" which are imperative for pro-tumorigenic response in monocytes and are highly upregulated during the late stage of human cervical cancer which results in activation of JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway in monocytes [46]. In cervical cancer, inhibition of NF-κB in CD83+ dendritic cells is the consequence of the diminished CCR7 expression that leads to interrupted dendritic cell migration to the lymph node-homing chemokine. Antigen transport to the secondary lymphoid tissue by stromal dendritic cells gets impaired due to diminished CCR7 expression. Cervical cancer cell-derived IL-6 immobilizes the dendritic cells in the tumor stroma via suppression of CCR7 resulting in local MMP-9 production [50]. Furthermore, the low level of IFN-γ production by M2-polarized macrophages causes a reduced level of T-cell proliferation in cervical cancer stroma [51]. The programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1) is expressed by most of the CD8+ T cells in cervical cancer, and the

suppressed cytotoxic cell response is probably due to M2-macrophages [52].

in endocervical cells, and cervical cytology positive for malignant [56].

For evaluating anal lesions, high-resolution anoscopy is performed which is similar to colposcopy. However, anoscopy is more complex since it requires manipulation to visualize the entire SCJ along with lower accuracy. High-resolution anoscopy is performed as a first-line test for HPV surveillance in MSM population to follow up anal cytological findings [57]. Histopathological evaluations are considered as the reference standards for deciding the treatment in precancerous or cancerous stages of HPV [58]. CIN3 is considered as the precancerous stage of the HPV infection and can be treated, whereas CIN1 is the morphological representation of HPV infection

Screening of cervical cancer includes three major procedures: cytology (microscopic evaluations of sample acquired from cervical regions), nucleic acid test (detection of HrHPV DNA or RNA), and co-testing (combination of microscopy and nucleic acid test) [53]. In the clinical settings, some of the routine tests for HPV detection are biopsy, DNA-based test, Pap smear, colposcopy, and acetic acid test. Colposcopy is the clinical examination of the cervix, vagina, and vulva upon application of acetic acid solution which is known as visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) and is mostly coupled with biopsy of regions suspected of neoplasia [54]. Colposcopy findings are evaluated and represented on the basis of acetowhite lesion, mosaic pattern, punctuation, and surface contour [55]. Due to the higher chance of false-positive results, colposcopy screening is recommended for various conditions such as HIV-infected individuals, dyskaryosis, borderline nuclear change

signaling by monocytes [48]. MMP-9 has been

cancer results in expansion of epithelial stem cell compartments.

**8**

Prophylactic vaccination is the primary preventive measure to control the HrHPV infection and reduce the burden of HPV-related cancer [62]. Currently available vaccine for HPV comprises viruslike particles (VLPs) which is the major HPV coat protein L1. VLPs are noninfectious in nature which lacks DNA and have similar geometry to the native virus [63]. Currently, three prophylactic VLP vaccines have been licensed, namely, as the bivalent Cervarix, the nonavalent Gardasil, and the quadrivalent Gardasil [64]. Cervarix is based on the HPV 16 and HPV 18 antigens and proprietary adjuvants for enhancement of immunogenicity [65]. While Gardasil provides protection against wide range of HPV such as HPV 6, HPV 11, HPV 18, HPV 31, HPV 33, HPV 45, HPV 52, and HPV 52 [66]. All the vaccines are intended to provide complete protection against HPV if administered before the exposure and have been shown to be highly efficacious without any adverse effects. More than 64 countries have introduced the HPV vaccination program primarily targeting girls of age 9–13 and boys of higher age group [67]. In both males and females, systemic immunization with HPV vaccine results in higher amount of antibody generation as 1–1000 times higher than the natural infection.

The management of HPV infection depends on the type and severity of the HPV infection. For the precancerous stage of HPV infection, it includes treatment strategies as excision, ablation, and immunotherapy. The gold standard for the management of HPV treatment is various excisional procedures of the transformation zone where the extent of excision depends on the lesion size [68]. Ablation procedures are less invasive and include cold coagulation, laser therapy, and cryotherapy with the disadvantage of procurement of tissue sample for confirmatory diagnosis. The immunotherapy has shown to be effective but is still present in the clinical trial stages [69]. Anogenital cancers are treated by radical local excision and by regional lymphadenectomy during the spread of infection to the lymphatic system [70]. During cervical cancer radical hysterectomy which is the removal of the whole uterus including the upper vagina and supporting ligaments along with excision of paracervical soft tissue is performed. Surgical intervention not only defines the involvement of lymph nodes but also suggests the treatment alternatives as radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy.

Radiotherapy is the acceptable primary treatment for the early stage of anogenital cancer, whereas for the advanced-stage metastatic cancer, palliative therapy is the only option. In the recurrent cervical cancer, the antiangiogenic treatment such as bevacizumab along with cisplatin and paclitaxel can prolong the survival [71]. In case of invasive form of cervical cancer, treatment is based on surgery, brachytherapy, external beam radiation, and

cisplatin-based chemotherapy [72]. In case of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer, cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the primary therapeutic approach [73]. Radiotherapy or surgical intervention is the choice of treatment during the primary early stage of oropharyngeal cancer.

### **7. Conclusions**

Globally, over 4.6% of all the cancer cases are attributed to HPV each year where vast majority of the cases are of cervical cancer. HPV 16 and HPV 18 are predominantly responsible for progression toward cancer development. The greatest burden of HPV infection comes in the form of cervical cancer and can be prevented. The burden of cervical cancer in the form of high toll number can be reduced via vaccination, screening programs, and implementation of the early treatment along with palliation. Vaccination is the ultimate preventive strategy for all the forms of HPV-associated cancers, and the evidences are suggesting the safety of the strategy.

### **8. Future perspectives**

From the last 36 years, the research in the area of HPV focuses on the prevention strategies and led to the development of vaccine and screening programs. However, new treatment for HPV infection and HPV-related cancer is still under investigation. Immunotherapy for the systemic treatment of HPV infection is the most promising area research worldwide, but none of them have been FDA approved. In order to reduce the burden of HPV-associated cancer, global implementation of vaccination and risk-based screening programs must be followed. The use of HPV-FASTER should be compelled to exemplify the current need of vaccination and screening among the higher prevalence of HPV in young generation. Currently, preventive vaccines are being developed targeting a wide range of HPV subtypes which might reduce and eventually eliminate the need of cervical cancer screening.

### **Author details**

Shailendra K. Saxena1,2\*, Swatantra Kumar1 , Madhu Mati Goel1 , Apjit Kaur1 and Madan LB Bhatt1

1 Centre for Advance Research (CFAR), King George's Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow, India

2 CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, India

\*Address all correspondence to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

**11**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

during the 6-year follow-up. The Journal of General Virology. 2017;**98**(4):681-689

[9] Mirkovic J, Howitt BE, Roncarati P, Demoulin S, Suarez-Carmona M, Hubert P, et al. Carcinogenic HPV infection in the cervical squamocolumnar junction. The Journal of Pathology. 2015;**236**(3):265-271

[10] Ginindza TG, Dlamini X, Almonte

Gwegweni JM, et al. Prevalence of and associated risk factors for high risk human papillomavirus among sexually active women, Swaziland. PLoS One.

[11] Lee CH, Peng CY, Li RN, Chen YC, Tsai HT, Hung YH, et al. Risk evaluation

intraepithelial neoplasia: Development and validation of risk-scoring schemes. International Journal of Cancer.

[12] Lin C, Franceschi S, Clifford GM. Human papillomavirus types from infection to cancer in the anus, according to sex and HIV status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases.

[13] Chockalingam R, Downing C, Tyring SK. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients. Journal of Clinical Medicine.

[14] Ribeiro AA, Costa MC, Alves RR, Villa LL, Saddi VA, Carneiro MA, et al. HPV infection and cervical neoplasia: Associated risk factors. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2015;**10**:16

[15] McLaughlin-Drubin ME. Human papillomaviruses and non-melanoma skin cancer. Seminars in Oncology.

for the development of cervical

M, Herrero R, Jolly PE, Tsoka-

2017;**12**(1):e0170189

2015;**136**(2):340-349

2018;**18**(2):198-206

2015;**4**(6):1229-1239

2015;**42**(2):284-290

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

[1] de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;**141**(4):664-670

[2] Kocjan BJ, Bzhalava D, Forslund O, Dillner J, Poljak M. Molecular methods for identification and characterization of novel papillomaviruses. Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[3] de Sanjosé S, Brotons M, Pavón MA.

papillomavirus infection. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics &

[4] Carifi M, Napolitano D, Morandi M, Dall'Olio D. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Current and future perspectives. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2015;**11**:731-738

[5] Kelly H, Mayaud P, Segondy M, Pant Pai N, Peeling RW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance of pointof-care tests for human papillomavirus screening. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2017;**93**(S4):S36-S45

[6] Tommasino M. The human papillomavirus family and its role in carcinogenesis. Seminars in Cancer

[7] Molijn A, Jenkins D, Chen W, Zhang X, Pirog E, Enqi W, et al. The complex relationship between human papillomavirus and cervical adenocarcinoma. International Journal

of Cancer. 2016;**138**(2):409-416

[8] Lorenzi A, Rautava J, Kero K,

of HPV16 in oral asymptomatic infections that persisted or cleared

Syrjänen K, Longatto-Filho A, Grenman S, et al. Physical state and copy numbers

Biology. 2014;**26**:13-21

The natural history of human

Gynaecology. 2018;**47**:2-13

2015;**21**(9):808-816

**References**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

### **References**

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

primary early stage of oropharyngeal cancer.

cisplatin-based chemotherapy [72]. In case of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer, cisplatin-based chemotherapy has been the primary therapeutic approach [73]. Radiotherapy or surgical intervention is the choice of treatment during the

Globally, over 4.6% of all the cancer cases are attributed to HPV each year where vast majority of the cases are of cervical cancer. HPV 16 and HPV 18 are predominantly responsible for progression toward cancer development. The greatest burden of HPV infection comes in the form of cervical cancer and can be prevented. The burden of cervical cancer in the form of high toll number can be reduced via vaccination, screening programs, and implementation of the early treatment along with palliation. Vaccination is the ultimate preventive strategy for all the forms of HPV-associated cancers, and the evidences are suggesting the safety of the strategy.

From the last 36 years, the research in the area of HPV focuses on the prevention strategies and led to the development of vaccine and screening programs. However, new treatment for HPV infection and HPV-related cancer is still under investigation. Immunotherapy for the systemic treatment of HPV infection is the most promising area research worldwide, but none of them have been FDA approved. In order to reduce the burden of HPV-associated cancer, global implementation of vaccination and risk-based screening programs must be followed. The use of HPV-FASTER should be compelled to exemplify the current need of vaccination and screening among the higher prevalence of HPV in young generation. Currently, preventive vaccines are being developed targeting a wide range of HPV subtypes which might reduce and eventually eliminate the need of cervical cancer screening.

**10**

**Author details**

**7. Conclusions**

**8. Future perspectives**

Lucknow, India

and Madan LB Bhatt1

provided the original work is properly cited.

Shailendra K. Saxena1,2\*, Swatantra Kumar1

\*Address all correspondence to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
© 2018 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,

1 Centre for Advance Research (CFAR), King George's Medical University (KGMU),

2 CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology (CCMB), Hyderabad, India

, Madhu Mati Goel1

, Apjit Kaur1

[1] de Martel C, Plummer M, Vignat J, Franceschi S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. International Journal of Cancer. 2017;**141**(4):664-670

[2] Kocjan BJ, Bzhalava D, Forslund O, Dillner J, Poljak M. Molecular methods for identification and characterization of novel papillomaviruses. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2015;**21**(9):808-816

[3] de Sanjosé S, Brotons M, Pavón MA. The natural history of human papillomavirus infection. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;**47**:2-13

[4] Carifi M, Napolitano D, Morandi M, Dall'Olio D. Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis: Current and future perspectives. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. 2015;**11**:731-738

[5] Kelly H, Mayaud P, Segondy M, Pant Pai N, Peeling RW. A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the performance of pointof-care tests for human papillomavirus screening. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2017;**93**(S4):S36-S45

[6] Tommasino M. The human papillomavirus family and its role in carcinogenesis. Seminars in Cancer Biology. 2014;**26**:13-21

[7] Molijn A, Jenkins D, Chen W, Zhang X, Pirog E, Enqi W, et al. The complex relationship between human papillomavirus and cervical adenocarcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2016;**138**(2):409-416

[8] Lorenzi A, Rautava J, Kero K, Syrjänen K, Longatto-Filho A, Grenman S, et al. Physical state and copy numbers of HPV16 in oral asymptomatic infections that persisted or cleared

during the 6-year follow-up. The Journal of General Virology. 2017;**98**(4):681-689

[9] Mirkovic J, Howitt BE, Roncarati P, Demoulin S, Suarez-Carmona M, Hubert P, et al. Carcinogenic HPV infection in the cervical squamocolumnar junction. The Journal of Pathology. 2015;**236**(3):265-271

[10] Ginindza TG, Dlamini X, Almonte M, Herrero R, Jolly PE, Tsoka-Gwegweni JM, et al. Prevalence of and associated risk factors for high risk human papillomavirus among sexually active women, Swaziland. PLoS One. 2017;**12**(1):e0170189

[11] Lee CH, Peng CY, Li RN, Chen YC, Tsai HT, Hung YH, et al. Risk evaluation for the development of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Development and validation of risk-scoring schemes. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;**136**(2):340-349

[12] Lin C, Franceschi S, Clifford GM. Human papillomavirus types from infection to cancer in the anus, according to sex and HIV status: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2018;**18**(2):198-206

[13] Chockalingam R, Downing C, Tyring SK. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in organ transplant recipients. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2015;**4**(6):1229-1239

[14] Ribeiro AA, Costa MC, Alves RR, Villa LL, Saddi VA, Carneiro MA, et al. HPV infection and cervical neoplasia: Associated risk factors. Infectious Agents and Cancer. 2015;**10**:16

[15] McLaughlin-Drubin ME. Human papillomaviruses and non-melanoma skin cancer. Seminars in Oncology. 2015;**42**(2):284-290

[16] Hufbauer M, Cooke J, van der Horst GT, Pfister H, Storey A, Akgül B. Human papillomavirus mediated inhibition of DNA damage sensing and repair drives skin carcinogenesis. Molecular Cancer. 2015;**14**:183

[17] Roden RBS, Stern PL. Opportunities and challenges for human papillomavirus vaccination in cancer. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2018;**18**(4):240-254

[18] Clifford GM, Gallus S, Herrero R, Muñoz N, Snijders PJ, Vaccarella S, et al. Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the International Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys: A pooled analysis. Lancet. 2005;**366**(9490):991-998

[19] Serrano B, Brotons M, Bosch FX, Bruni L. Epidemiology and burden of HPV-related disease. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;**47**:14-26

[20] De Vuyst H, Alemany L, Lacey C, Chibwesha CJ, Sahasrabuddhe V, Banura C, et al. The burden of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases in sub-saharan Africa. Vaccine. 2013;**31**(05):F32-F46

[21] Human Papillomavirus and related diseases report Americas. http://www. hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/XMX.pdf

[22] Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferrer E, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: Metaanalysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;**202**(12):1789-1799

[23] Guan P, Howell-Jones R, Li N, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Franceschi S, et al. Human papillomavirus types in 115,789 HPV-positive women: A meta-analysis from cervical infection to cancer. International Journal of Cancer. 2012;**131**(10):2349-2359

[24] Giuliano AR, Nyitray AG, Kreimer AR, Pierce Campbell CM, Goodman MT, Sudenga SL, et al. EUROGIN 2014 roadmap: Differences in human papillomavirus infection natural history, transmission and human papillomavirus-related cancer incidence by gender and anatomic site of infection. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;**136**(12):2752-2760

[25] Doorbar J, Egawa N, Griffin H, Kranjec C, Murakami I. Human papillomavirus molecular biology and disease association. Reviews in Medical Virology. 2015;**25**(Suppl 1):2-23

[26] Bernard HU. Regulatory elements in the viral genome. Virology. 2013;**445**(1-2):197-204

[27] Howley PM, Pfister HJ. Beta genus papillomaviruses and skin cancer. Virology. 2015;**479-480**:290-296

[28] Straub E, Dreer M, Fertey J, Iftner T, Stubenrauch F. The viral E8^E2C repressor limits productive replication of human papillomavirus 16. Journal of Virology. 2014;**88**(2):937-947

[29] Nguyen HP, Ramírez-Fort MK, Rady PL. The biology of human papillomaviruses. Current Problems in Dermatology. 2014;**45**:19-32

[30] Giroglou T, Florin L, Schäfer F, Streeck RE, Sapp M. Human papillomavirus infection requires cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Virology. 2001;**75**(3):1565-1570

[31] Day PM, Schiller JT. The role of furin in papillomavirus infection. Future Microbiology. 2009;**4**(10):1255-1262

[32] Popa A, Zhang W, Harrison MS, Goodner K, Kazakov T, Goodwin EC, et al. Direct binding of retromer to

**13**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

HPV-mediated degradation of p53. Nature. 2016;**529**(7587):541-545

[40] Katzenellenbogen RA. Activation of telomerase by HPVs. Virus Research.

[41] White EA, Münger K, Howley PM. High-risk human papillomavirus E7 proteins target PTPN14 for degradation.

MBio. 2016;**7**(5):e01530-e01516

[42] Choi M, Lee C. Immortalization of primary keratinocytes and its application to skin research. Biomolecules & Therapeutics (Seoul).

[43] Hasan UA, Bates E, Takeshita F, Biliato A, Accardi R, Bouvard V, et al. TLR9 expression and function is abolished by the cervical cancerassociated human papillomavirus type 16. Journal of Immunology.

[44] Shah M, Anwar MA, Park S, Jafri SS, Choi S. In silico mechanistic analysis of IRF3 inactivation and high-risk HPV E6 species-dependent drug response. Scientific Reports.

[45] Park JS, Kim EJ, Kwon HJ, Hwang ES, Namkoong SE, Um SJ. Inactivation of interferon regulatory factor-1 tumor suppressor protein by HPV E7 oncoprotein. Implication for the E7-mediated immune evasion mechanism in cervical carcinogenesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

2000;**275**(10):6764-6769

Research. 2017;**4**:58-65

[46] Smola S. Immunopathogenesis of HPV-associated cancers and prospects for immunotherapy. Viruses. 2017;**9**(9):E254

[47] Bashaw AA, Leggatt GR, Chandra J, Tuong ZK, Frazer IH. Modulation of antigen presenting cell functions during chronic HPV infection. Papillomavirus

2017;**231**:50-55

2015;**23**(5):391-399

2007;**178**(5):3186-3197

2015;**5**:13446

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

human papillomavirus type 16 minor capsid protein L2 mediates endosome exit during viral infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2015;**11**(2):e1004699

[33] Aydin I, Weber S, Snijder B, Samperio Ventayol P, Kühbacher A, Becker M, et al. Large scale RNAi reveals the requirement of nuclear envelope breakdown for nuclear import of human papillomaviruses. PLoS Pathogens.

[34] Wang JW, Roden RB. L2, the minor capsid protein of papillomavirus. Virology. 2013;**445**(1-2):175-186

Christensen ND, Meyers C. Propagation,

[36] Bienkowska-Haba M, Luszczek W, Myers JE, Keiffer TR, DiGiuseppe S, Polk P, et al. A new cell culture model to genetically dissect the complete human papillomavirus life cycle. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;**14**(3):e1006846

[37] Bergner S, Halec G, Schmitt M, Aubin F, Alonso A, Auvinen E.

Individual and complementary effects of human papillomavirus oncogenes on epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Cells, Tissues, Organs.

[38] Wasson CW, Morgan EL, Müller M,

Ross RL, Hartley M, Roberts S, et al. Human papillomavirus type 18 E5 oncogene supports cell cycle progression and impairs epithelial differentiation by modulating growth factor receptor signalling during the virus life cycle. Oncotarget. 2017;**8**(61):103581-103600

[39] Martinez-Zapien D, Ruiz FX, Poirson J, Mitschler A, Ramirez J, Forster A, et al. Structure of the E6/ E6AP/p53 complex required for

[35] McLaughlin-Drubin ME,

infection, and neutralization of authentic HPV16 virus. Virology.

2014;**10**(5):e1004162

2004;**322**(2):213-219

2016;**201**(2):97-108

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

human papillomavirus type 16 minor capsid protein L2 mediates endosome exit during viral infection. PLoS Pathogens. 2015;**11**(2):e1004699

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

cancer. International Journal of Cancer.

2012;**131**(10):2349-2359

[24] Giuliano AR, Nyitray AG, Kreimer AR, Pierce Campbell CM, Goodman MT, Sudenga SL, et al. EUROGIN 2014 roadmap: Differences in human papillomavirus infection natural history, transmission and human papillomavirus-related cancer incidence by gender and anatomic site of infection. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;**136**(12):2752-2760

[25] Doorbar J, Egawa N, Griffin H, Kranjec C, Murakami I. Human papillomavirus molecular biology and disease association. Reviews in Medical

Virology. 2015;**25**(Suppl 1):2-23

in the viral genome. Virology. 2013;**445**(1-2):197-204

Virology. 2014;**88**(2):937-947

Dermatology. 2014;**45**:19-32

[31] Day PM, Schiller JT. The role of furin in papillomavirus infection. Future Microbiology.

2009;**4**(10):1255-1262

[29] Nguyen HP, Ramírez-Fort MK, Rady PL. The biology of human papillomaviruses. Current Problems in

[30] Giroglou T, Florin L, Schäfer F, Streeck RE, Sapp M. Human

papillomavirus infection requires cell surface heparan sulfate. Journal of Virology. 2001;**75**(3):1565-1570

[32] Popa A, Zhang W, Harrison MS, Goodner K, Kazakov T, Goodwin EC, et al. Direct binding of retromer to

[26] Bernard HU. Regulatory elements

[27] Howley PM, Pfister HJ. Beta genus papillomaviruses and skin cancer. Virology. 2015;**479-480**:290-296

[28] Straub E, Dreer M, Fertey J, Iftner T, Stubenrauch F. The viral E8^E2C repressor limits productive replication of human papillomavirus 16. Journal of

[17] Roden RBS, Stern PL. Opportunities

[18] Clifford GM, Gallus S, Herrero R, Muñoz N, Snijders PJ, Vaccarella S, et al. Worldwide distribution of human papillomavirus types in cytologically normal women in the International Agency for Research on Cancer HPV prevalence surveys: A pooled analysis. Lancet. 2005;**366**(9490):991-998

[19] Serrano B, Brotons M, Bosch FX, Bruni L. Epidemiology and burden of HPV-related disease. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;**47**:14-26

[20] De Vuyst H, Alemany L, Lacey C, Chibwesha CJ, Sahasrabuddhe V, Banura C, et al. The burden of human papillomavirus infections and related diseases in sub-saharan Africa. Vaccine.

[21] Human Papillomavirus and related diseases report Americas. http://www. hpvcentre.net/statistics/reports/XMX.pdf

[22] Bruni L, Diaz M, Castellsagué X, Ferrer E, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S. Cervical human papillomavirus prevalence in 5 continents: Metaanalysis of 1 million women with normal cytological findings. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;**202**(12):1789-1799

[23] Guan P, Howell-Jones R, Li N, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Franceschi S, et al. Human papillomavirus types in 115,789 HPV-positive women: A meta-analysis from cervical infection to

2013;**31**(05):F32-F46

[16] Hufbauer M, Cooke J, van der Horst GT, Pfister H, Storey A, Akgül B. Human papillomavirus mediated inhibition of DNA damage sensing and repair drives skin carcinogenesis.

Molecular Cancer. 2015;**14**:183

and challenges for human papillomavirus vaccination in cancer. Nature Reviews. Cancer.

2018;**18**(4):240-254

**12**

[33] Aydin I, Weber S, Snijder B, Samperio Ventayol P, Kühbacher A, Becker M, et al. Large scale RNAi reveals the requirement of nuclear envelope breakdown for nuclear import of human papillomaviruses. PLoS Pathogens. 2014;**10**(5):e1004162

[34] Wang JW, Roden RB. L2, the minor capsid protein of papillomavirus. Virology. 2013;**445**(1-2):175-186

[35] McLaughlin-Drubin ME, Christensen ND, Meyers C. Propagation, infection, and neutralization of authentic HPV16 virus. Virology. 2004;**322**(2):213-219

[36] Bienkowska-Haba M, Luszczek W, Myers JE, Keiffer TR, DiGiuseppe S, Polk P, et al. A new cell culture model to genetically dissect the complete human papillomavirus life cycle. PLoS Pathogens. 2018;**14**(3):e1006846

[37] Bergner S, Halec G, Schmitt M, Aubin F, Alonso A, Auvinen E. Individual and complementary effects of human papillomavirus oncogenes on epithelial cell proliferation and differentiation. Cells, Tissues, Organs. 2016;**201**(2):97-108

[38] Wasson CW, Morgan EL, Müller M, Ross RL, Hartley M, Roberts S, et al. Human papillomavirus type 18 E5 oncogene supports cell cycle progression and impairs epithelial differentiation by modulating growth factor receptor signalling during the virus life cycle. Oncotarget. 2017;**8**(61):103581-103600

[39] Martinez-Zapien D, Ruiz FX, Poirson J, Mitschler A, Ramirez J, Forster A, et al. Structure of the E6/ E6AP/p53 complex required for

HPV-mediated degradation of p53. Nature. 2016;**529**(7587):541-545

[40] Katzenellenbogen RA. Activation of telomerase by HPVs. Virus Research. 2017;**231**:50-55

[41] White EA, Münger K, Howley PM. High-risk human papillomavirus E7 proteins target PTPN14 for degradation. MBio. 2016;**7**(5):e01530-e01516

[42] Choi M, Lee C. Immortalization of primary keratinocytes and its application to skin research. Biomolecules & Therapeutics (Seoul). 2015;**23**(5):391-399

[43] Hasan UA, Bates E, Takeshita F, Biliato A, Accardi R, Bouvard V, et al. TLR9 expression and function is abolished by the cervical cancerassociated human papillomavirus type 16. Journal of Immunology. 2007;**178**(5):3186-3197

[44] Shah M, Anwar MA, Park S, Jafri SS, Choi S. In silico mechanistic analysis of IRF3 inactivation and high-risk HPV E6 species-dependent drug response. Scientific Reports. 2015;**5**:13446

[45] Park JS, Kim EJ, Kwon HJ, Hwang ES, Namkoong SE, Um SJ. Inactivation of interferon regulatory factor-1 tumor suppressor protein by HPV E7 oncoprotein. Implication for the E7-mediated immune evasion mechanism in cervical carcinogenesis. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;**275**(10):6764-6769

[46] Smola S. Immunopathogenesis of HPV-associated cancers and prospects for immunotherapy. Viruses. 2017;**9**(9):E254

[47] Bashaw AA, Leggatt GR, Chandra J, Tuong ZK, Frazer IH. Modulation of antigen presenting cell functions during chronic HPV infection. Papillomavirus Research. 2017;**4**:58-65

[48] Schröer N, Pahne J, Walch B, Wickenhauser C, Smola S. Molecular pathobiology of human cervical high-grade lesions: Paracrine STAT3 activation in tumor-instructed myeloid cells drives local MMP-9 expression. Cancer Research. 2011;**71**(1):87-97

[49] Woodby B, Scott M, Bodily J. The interaction between human papillomaviruses and the stromal microenvironment. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science. 2016;**144**:169-238

[50] Pahne-Zeppenfeld J, Schröer N, Walch-Rückheim B, Oldak M, Gorter A, Hegde S, et al. Cervical cancer cell-derived interleukin-6 impairs CCR7-dependent migration of MMP-9-expressing dendritic cells. International Journal of Cancer. 2014;**134**(9):2061-2073

[51] Allavena P, Sica A, Solinas G, Porta C, Mantovani A. The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: The role of tumorassociated macrophages. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology. 2008;**66**(1):1-9

[52] Zhang Y, Zhu W, Zhang X, Qu Q, Zhang L. Expression and clinical significance of programmed death-1 on lymphocytes and programmed death ligand-1 on monocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with cervical cancer. Oncology Letters. 2017;**14**(6):7225-7231

[53] Burd EM. Human papillomavirus laboratory testing: The changing paradigm. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2016;**29**(2):291-319

[54] Tebeu PM, Fokom-Domgue J, Crofts V, Flahaut E, Catarino R, Untiet S, et al. Effectiveness of a two-stage strategy with HPV testing followed by visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in a low-income setting. International Journal of Cancer. 2015;**136**(6):E743-E750

[55] Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R. Colposcopic Assessment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Colposcopy and Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Beginners' Manual. http://screening.iarc.fr/ colpochap.php?chap=7.php&lang=1 [Accessed on: 15-05-2018]

[56] Dixit R, Bhavsar C, Marfatia YS. Laboratory diagnosis of human papillomavirus virus infection in female genital tract. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2011;**32**(1):50-52

[57] Leeds IL, Fang SH. Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2016;**8**(1):41-51

[58] Jenkins D. Histopathology and cytopathology of cervical cancer. Disease Markers. 2007;**23**(4):199-212

[59] Khan MJ, Smith-McCune KK. Treatment of cervical precancers: Back to basics. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;**123**(6):1339-1343

[60] Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Marandino F, Vocaturo G, Sindico R, Piperno G, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4a) is predictive of HR-HPV infection in cervical low-grade lesions. Modern Pathology. 2006;**19**(3):384-391

[61] Kulmala SM, Syrjänen S, Shabalova I, Petrovichev N, Kozachenko V, Podistov J, et al. Human papillomavirus testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay and PCR as screening tools. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2004;**42**(6):2470-2475

[62] Poljak M. Prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination and primary prevention of cervical cancer: Issues and challenges. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2012;**18**(Suppl 5):64-69

**15**

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management*

cancers. Current Oncology Reports.

[71] Banerjee S. Bevacizumab in cervical cancer: A step forward for survival. Lancet. 2017;**390**(10103):1626-1628

[72] Chuang LT, Temin S, Camacho R, Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Feldman S,

[73] Perez CA, Wu X, Amsbaugh MJ, Gosain R, Claudino WM, Yusuf M, et al. High-dose versus weekly cisplatin definitive chemoradiotherapy for HPVrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral

Gultekin M, et al. Management and care of women with invasive cervical cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology resource-stratified clinical practice guideline. Journal of Global Oncology.

2014;**16**(9):402

2016;**2**(5):311-340

Oncology. 2017;**67**:24-28

*DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

[63] Mohsen MO, Zha L, Cabral-Miranda G, Bachmann MF. Major findings and recent advances in virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines. Seminars in Immunology. 2017;**34**:123-132

Matranga D, Bellavia C, Guarneri MF, Fasciana T, et al. Potential impact of a nonavalent HPV vaccine on HPV related low-and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions: A referral hospital-based study in Sicily. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.

[65] Monie A, Hung CF, Roden R, Wu TC. Cervarix: A vaccine for the prevention of HPV 16, 18-associated

2008;**2**(1):97-105. PubMed PMID: 19707432; PubMed Central PMCID:

[66] Mejilla A, Li E, Sadowski CA. Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination: Questions and answers. Canadian Pharmacicts Journal (Ott).

[67] Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Herrero R, Bray F, Bosch FX, et al. Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: A pooled analysis. The Lancet Global Health.

[68] Srivastava M, Srivastava A. Excisional procedures for treatment of intraepithelial lesions. In: Colposcopy of Female Genital Tract. Singapore:

[69] Lee SJ, Yang A, Wu TC, Hung CF.

[70] Wakeham K, Kavanagh K. The burden of HPV-associated anogenital

Springer; 2017. pp. 183-196

Immunotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated disease and cervical cancer: Review of clinical and translational research. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2016;**27**(5):e51

cervical cancer. Biologics.

[64] Capra G, Giovannelli L,

2017;**13**(8):1839-1843

PMC2727782

2017;**150**(5):306-315

2016;**4**(7):e453-e463

*Recent Advances in Human Papillomavirus Infection and Management DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81970*

[63] Mohsen MO, Zha L, Cabral-Miranda G, Bachmann MF. Major findings and recent advances in virus-like particle (VLP)-based vaccines. Seminars in Immunology. 2017;**34**:123-132

*Current Perspectives in Human Papillomavirus*

[55] Sellors JW, Sankaranarayanan R.

[56] Dixit R, Bhavsar C, Marfatia YS. Laboratory diagnosis of human papillomavirus virus infection in female genital tract. Indian Journal of Sexually Transmitted Diseases.

[57] Leeds IL, Fang SH. Anal cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia screening: A review. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[58] Jenkins D. Histopathology and cytopathology of cervical cancer. Disease Markers. 2007;**23**(4):199-212

[59] Khan MJ, Smith-McCune KK. Treatment of cervical precancers: Back to basics. Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[60] Benevolo M, Mottolese M, Marandino F, Vocaturo G, Sindico R, Piperno G, et al. Immunohistochemical expression of p16(INK4a) is predictive of HR-HPV infection in cervical low-grade lesions. Modern Pathology.

[61] Kulmala SM, Syrjänen S, Shabalova I, Petrovichev N, Kozachenko V, Podistov J, et al. Human papillomavirus testing with the hybrid capture 2 assay and PCR as screening tools. Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[62] Poljak M. Prophylactic human papillomavirus vaccination and primary prevention of cervical cancer: Issues and challenges. Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

2014;**123**(6):1339-1343

2006;**19**(3):384-391

2004;**42**(6):2470-2475

2012;**18**(Suppl 5):64-69

Colposcopic Assessment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Colposcopy and Treatment of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Beginners' Manual. http://screening.iarc.fr/ colpochap.php?chap=7.php&lang=1

[Accessed on: 15-05-2018]

2011;**32**(1):50-52

2016;**8**(1):41-51

[48] Schröer N, Pahne J, Walch B, Wickenhauser C, Smola S. Molecular pathobiology of human cervical high-grade lesions: Paracrine STAT3 activation in tumor-instructed myeloid cells drives local MMP-9 expression. Cancer Research. 2011;**71**(1):87-97

[49] Woodby B, Scott M, Bodily J. The interaction between human papillomaviruses and the stromal microenvironment. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational

[50] Pahne-Zeppenfeld J, Schröer N, Walch-Rückheim B, Oldak M, Gorter A,

[51] Allavena P, Sica A, Solinas G, Porta C, Mantovani A. The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: The role of tumorassociated macrophages. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.

[52] Zhang Y, Zhu W, Zhang X, Qu Q, Zhang L. Expression and clinical significance of programmed death-1 on lymphocytes and programmed death ligand-1 on monocytes in the peripheral blood of patients with cervical cancer. Oncology Letters. 2017;**14**(6):7225-7231

[53] Burd EM. Human papillomavirus laboratory testing: The changing paradigm. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 2016;**29**(2):291-319

[54] Tebeu PM, Fokom-Domgue J, Crofts V, Flahaut E, Catarino R, Untiet S, et al. Effectiveness of a two-stage strategy with HPV testing followed by visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening in a low-income setting. International Journal of Cancer.

Hegde S, et al. Cervical cancer cell-derived interleukin-6 impairs CCR7-dependent migration of MMP-9-expressing dendritic cells. International Journal of Cancer.

2014;**134**(9):2061-2073

2008;**66**(1):1-9

Science. 2016;**144**:169-238

**14**

2015;**136**(6):E743-E750

[64] Capra G, Giovannelli L, Matranga D, Bellavia C, Guarneri MF, Fasciana T, et al. Potential impact of a nonavalent HPV vaccine on HPV related low-and high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions: A referral hospital-based study in Sicily. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2017;**13**(8):1839-1843

[65] Monie A, Hung CF, Roden R, Wu TC. Cervarix: A vaccine for the prevention of HPV 16, 18-associated cervical cancer. Biologics. 2008;**2**(1):97-105. PubMed PMID: 19707432; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2727782

[66] Mejilla A, Li E, Sadowski CA. Human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination: Questions and answers. Canadian Pharmacicts Journal (Ott). 2017;**150**(5):306-315

[67] Bruni L, Diaz M, Barrionuevo-Rosas L, Herrero R, Bray F, Bosch FX, et al. Global estimates of human papillomavirus vaccination coverage by region and income level: A pooled analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2016;**4**(7):e453-e463

[68] Srivastava M, Srivastava A. Excisional procedures for treatment of intraepithelial lesions. In: Colposcopy of Female Genital Tract. Singapore: Springer; 2017. pp. 183-196

[69] Lee SJ, Yang A, Wu TC, Hung CF. Immunotherapy for human papillomavirus-associated disease and cervical cancer: Review of clinical and translational research. Journal of Gynecologic Oncology. 2016;**27**(5):e51

[70] Wakeham K, Kavanagh K. The burden of HPV-associated anogenital cancers. Current Oncology Reports. 2014;**16**(9):402

[71] Banerjee S. Bevacizumab in cervical cancer: A step forward for survival. Lancet. 2017;**390**(10103):1626-1628

[72] Chuang LT, Temin S, Camacho R, Dueñas-Gonzalez A, Feldman S, Gultekin M, et al. Management and care of women with invasive cervical cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology resource-stratified clinical practice guideline. Journal of Global Oncology. 2016;**2**(5):311-340

[73] Perez CA, Wu X, Amsbaugh MJ, Gosain R, Claudino WM, Yusuf M, et al. High-dose versus weekly cisplatin definitive chemoradiotherapy for HPVrelated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Oral Oncology. 2017;**67**:24-28

**17**

Section 2

Epidemiology and

Pathogenesis of Human

Papillomavirus

### Section 2


**7.4 Radiation carcinogenesis**

Radiation is a well-known carcinogen.

Latency: Extremely long latent period is common and It has a cumulative effect. Radiation has also additive or synergistic effects with other potential carcinogenic agents.

Types of radiation: They are divided into two types, namely:

1.Ultraviolet (UV) rays of sunlight, and

2. Ionizing electromagnetic and particulate radiation.

Ultraviolet rays:-. They are derived from the sunlight. Tumors caused: Skin cancer, namely.

1.Squamous cell carcinoma,

2.Basal cell carcinoma, and

3.Malignant melanoma.

They are more common on parts of the body regularly exposed to sunlight and ultraviolet light (UVL).

Risk factors.

The amount of damage incurred depends on:

• Type of UV rays.

◦ Intensity of exposure.


**3. Results**

*3.1. Results of the Experimental Study*

Tensile and rupture tests were carried out. Various factors were analyzed, including the loading rate and geometric dimensions of the specimen. As a result of the experiment, the modulus of elasticity was determined for different specimens (Table 2). The elasticity modulus strongly depends on the diameter and thickness of the shunt: for a thickness over 0.5 mm, its value increases several times, and for a thickness less than 0.35 mm, it decreases strongly. The stress–strain curve for a shunt with a diameter of 4.5 mm, wall thickness of 0.35 mm, and length of 20 mm by a rupture test is shown in the Figure 3. The load rate was 30 mm/min and the preload was 0.5 MPa.

**Table 2.** Parameters of samples used in the study.

**Figure 3.** Stress–strain diagram by specimen rupture test.

**Figure 3.** Stress–strain diagram by specimen rupture test. The tensile ultimate strength σY was also determined (Table 3); its value increases as the specimen diameter increases (Figure 4). The influence of loading rate on tensile strength σY determination was analyzed. The tensile strength value remained practically unchanged when the load rate application changed from 50 to 250 mm/min. The shape of The tensile ultimate strength σY was also determined (Table 3); its value increases as the specimen diameter increases (Figure 4). The influence of loading rate on tensile strength σY determination was analyzed. The tensile strength value remained practically unchanged when the load rate application changed from 50 to 250 mm/min. The shape of the tensile test curve for all specimens was the same. Stress–strain relationships were obtained as a result of tensile tests for two specimens (specimen no. 1, diameter of 5 mm, thickness of

the tensile test curve for all specimens was the same. Stress–strain relationships were obtained as a result of tensile tests for two specimens (specimen no. 1, diameter of 5 mm,

the obtained dependences (Table 4) and stress–strain dependences were plotted (Figure

**Figure 4.** Plot of change in ultimate strength with specimen diameter.

5).

0.5 mm, length of 20 mm; specimen no. 2, diameter of 3 mm, thickness of 0.35 mm, length of 20 mm). The constants for the strain density function were determined from the obtained dependences (Table 4) and stress–strain dependences were plotted (Figure 5). **Figure 3.** Stress–strain diagram by specimen rupture test. The tensile ultimate strength σY was also determined (Table 3); its value increases as

the specimen diameter increases (Figure 4). The influence of loading rate on tensile

*Materials* **2022**, *15*, x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 24

**Figure 4.** Plot of change in ultimate strength with specimen diameter.

**Figure 4.** Plot of change in ultimate strength with specimen diameter.

**Table 4.** Values of hyperelastic models for two samples.