with the said [victim’s] personal liberty____” We have implied that kidnapping is a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(1)(ii) because it involves a “serious potential risk of physical injury to the ... kidnapped person.” United States v. Lonczak, 993 F.2d 180, 182-83 (9th Cir.1993). In an analogous context, we explicitly held that “kidnapping entails a ‘serious potential risk of physical injury’ to the victim, making the offense a ‘violent felony1.... ” United States v. Sherbondy, 865 F.2d 996, 1009 (9th Cir.1988). That holding has been followed by other circuits which have determined that kidnapping is a “crime of violence” because it, by its very nature, involves a substantial risk of physical violence. See United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320, 324-25 (6th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Salemi 26 F.3d 1084, 1086
holding that the potential for violence against the victim is an inherent aspect of the crime of kidnapping under 18 usc  924 holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which involves a serious potential risk of injury under 18 usc  924 holding that bank robbery by force and violence or intimidation under 18 usc  2113a is a crime of violence holding that sexual assault of a child qualified as crime of violence under 18 usc  16 holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which necessarily involves the threatened use of physical force under 18 usc  924