Luzviminida Metzala, a native and ci 0) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Metzala’s contention that the in absentia
holding that a party is not bound by the testimony of a witness it calls holding that a panel of this court is bound by a holding of a prior panel but is not bound by a prior panels dicta holding a party is bound by a concession in his brief holding that agency is bound by its regulations holding that each party is deemed bound by the acts of his lawyeragent