with cocaine. During the court-ordered competency evaluation, Legg made potentially incriminating statements to a social worker, The trial court did not reveal if it relied on this evidence or not, although it apparently was among the voluminous materials before the court. {19 Because we cannot determine from the record what evidence, if any, the trial court relied on in finding that Legg had knowledge of the narcotic character of the substance in his pill bottle, we cannot conclude that Legg willfully violated his probation. We therefore remand to the trial court to identify the evidence it relied on and its reason for moving so quickly from a finding of "whatever it was" to a finding of knowledge that the substance was cocaine. See Black, 471 U.S. at 613-14, 105 S.Ct. 2254 (<HOLDING>). II. Failure To Be Cooperative, Compliant, and
holding we may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even those not relied upon by the district court holding that standard for revocation of probation is preponderance of the evidence holding that the decision of the bia will not be affirmed by this court unless the reasons for such a finding are made clear holding that if a trial court reaches the right result but for the wrong reasons it will be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record holding that without a finding from the trial court detailing the evidence relied on and the reasons for probation revocation there will not be an adequate basis for review to determine if the decision rests on permissible grounds supported by the evidence