prosecutions. See Arms v. State, 2015 Ark. 364, 471 S.W.3d 637 (2015) (Defendant’s unborn child was not a “person,” for purposes of statute governing criminal offense of introduction of a controlled, substance into the body of anoth er person, and thus none of defendant’s actions prior to birth of child violated statute; criminal code expressly limited criminalizing conduct with respect to unborn child to homicide offenses and even then did not allow a mother to be charged or convicted of any homicide offense while her child was in úte-ro); State v. Stegall, supra (pregnant woman cannot be charged for a crime allegedly committed against her unborn child; unborn fetus was not a “child” within meaning of endangerment statute); State v. Martinez, 139 N.M. 741, 137 P.3d 1195 (Ct.App.2006) (<HOLDING>); Kilmon v. State, supra (holding a mother may
holding an unborn viable fetus is not a human being under the new mexico child abuse statute and the mothers use of cocaine during pregnancy was not child abuse holding a mothers ingestion of a controlled substance while pregnant does not constitute child abuse as an unborn child is not a person for purposes of criminal prosecution holding ohios child endangerment statute does not apply to mothers who abuse drugs during pregnancy holding a fetus is not a child person or individual for purposes of criminal prosecution under the reckless injury to a child statute holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child