by the defendant. A supervisor is only liable for constitutional violations of ... subordinates if the supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to act to prevent them.” (citations omitted)). The district court properly dismissed without prejudice Brummett’s claim against defendant Kaur because Brummett failed to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to that claim before filing his third amended complaint. See McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198, 1199 (9th Cir. 2002) (per curiam) (requiring dismissal without prejudice where a prisoner “did not exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit but is in the process of doing so when a motion to dismiss is filed”); cf. Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 F.3d 1002, 1006-07 (9th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. ** This disposition is not
holding there is no statutory requirement that a taxpayer exhaust administrative remedies before filing a complaint in the tax court holding that a prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies even though his grievance was untimely holding that administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to filing a claim in court holding that the prisoner has the burden of demonstrating he has exhausted his administrative remedies in his complaint holding that exhaustion requirement is satisfied so long as prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies with respect to new claims asserted in an amended complaint before filing that complaint