the Gun-Free School Zones Act at issue in Lopez, the felon-in-possession statute has an express jurisdictional element, which would ensure that the firearm possession in question affects interstate commerce. McAllister, 77 F.3d at 389-90 n. 4. On numerous occasions, we have held that McAllister has not been overruled or called into question by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. See United States v. Scott, 263 F.3d 1270, 1271, 1273-74 (11th Cir.2001) (reaffirming our holding that § 922(g) is constitutional under Congress’s Commerce Clause power, and stating that “nothing in Morrison or Jones [v. United States, 529 U.S. 848, 120 S.Ct. 1904, 146 L.Ed.2d 902 (2000) ] alters the reasoning upon which McAllister is moored.”); United States v. Dupree, 258 F.3d 1258, 1259 (11th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Ballinger, 395 F.3d
recognizing that there is an outer limit to congresss power under the commerce clause holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act holding that morrison does not change the holding in mcallister and that  922g is a constitutional exercise of congresss commerce power holding unconstitutional 18 usc  922q as beyond congresss commerce clause power holding in the context of the predecessor statute to  922g that the interstate commerce element is met by demonstrating a minimal nexus