335, 354 (1976) (arguing that NFL draft would be “reasonable” if conducted in two sessions, with players who fail to sign after second session becoming “free agents” thereafter); Note, supra note 19 at 423, 425 (arguing that professional baseball draft, which allows player to be “redrafted” by another club if the first club fails to sign him within given time, “has proven itself to be a workable alternative to the more restrictive drafts used in other sports and thus should be required in all sports”). 66 . 420 F.Supp. at 746-47. See Note, 55 Nebr. L.Rev. 335, 353 (1976) (arguing that NFL draft would be “reasonable” if it lasted for five rounds instead of 17). Cf. Mackey v. NFL, 543 F.2d 606, 622 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. dismissed, 434 U.S. 801, 98 S.Ct. 28, 54 L.Ed.2d 59 (1977) (<HOLDING>); Note, The Legality of the Rozelle Rule and
holding that district court abused its discretion in finding suit unreasonable and groundless where inter alia the court had denied two prior summary judgment motions holding rozelle rule unreasonable inter alia because it applied not just to better players but to every nfl player regardless of his status or ability holding that comment on defendants silence was not reversible error because inter alia it did not have the effect of being probative on guilt or innocence holding that court did not prejudice defendant by limiting his counsel to preestablished limitations on inter alia the scope of crossexamination holding inter alia that common law claims were preempted