Chamberlain’s application, affidavits from Chamberlain and his friends, the State’s response, an affidavit from Chamberlain’s trial attorney, and Chamberlain’s reply, the trial court denied relief without holding a hearing. Chamberlain now appeals. III. STANDARD OF REVIEW In general, a trial court’s ruling in a habeas proceeding should not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion. Ex parte Jessep, 281 S.W.3d 675, 678 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2009, pet. ref'd). We are to evaluate whether the trial court abused its discretion by determining whether the tri al court acted without reference to any guiding rules or principles. Id. In doing so, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling. Ex parte Wheeler, 203 S.W.3d 317, 325-26 (Tex.Crim.App.2006) (<HOLDING>); State v. Wilson, 288 S.W.3d 13, 16
holding that in ruling on a summaryjudgment motion record evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to nonmovant holding that appellate court reviewing trial courts habeas corpus ruling must review record evidence in light most favorable to ruling and uphold ruling absent abuse of discretion holding that an appellate court considers all evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and grants the state all reasonable inferences holding that when reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence all evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government holding court of appeals was to review facts in light most favorable to trial courts ruling even when no witnesses testified and all evidence was submitted in written affidavits