in the Eighth Circuit that probable cause to arrest a drug trafficker establishes an inference that there is evidence at his residence. See United States v. Ross, 487 F.3d 1120, 1123 (8th Cir.2007). The Eighth Circuit has instead found probable cause in cases where an affidavit contains at least some information connecting the drug activity to the home. See United States v. Luloff, 15 F.3d 763, 768 (8th Cir.1994) In Luloff, a suppression motion was denied where the officers not only inferred that evidence of drug trafficking would be at the home of a drug dealer based on their experience, but also included information from reliable witnesses and informants that tended to support the defendant had engaged in repetitive drug trafficking activity with some of the activity ta 8th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Marion, 238 F.3d 965, 969
holding anticipatory warrant for search of defendants home was invalid because contraband was picked up by defendant rather than being delivered to his home and affidavit failed to provide facts establishing a nexus between contraband and defendants home holding that executing officers reasonably relied on judges determination that there was probable cause to search motel room even though search warrant affidavit failed to mention a connection between motel room and criminal activity holding that a party failed to present any evidence to rebut inference that delay was unreasonable and inexcusable holding that an affidavit failed to establish a connection between a residence and contraband but that it was not entirely unreasonable for the executing officer to believe that such an inference was permissible holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence