had been filed and that there did not appear to be any genuine issue of material fact in need of determination. The Morronis argue, and we agree, that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. Household’s complaint filed in June 2001 alleged that the Morronis failed to make payments on their mortgage from March 2001 onward. The twenty-eight affirmative defenses alleged, among other things, that the Morronis made advance payments towards the mortgage for the months of March, April, May, June, July, and August of 2001. Household never factually refuted the affirmative defenses or established that they were legally insufficient. Therefore, Household did not establish its entitlement to summary judgment. See Jones v. City of Winter Haven, 870 So.2d 52 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>); Manassas Inves., Inc. v. O’Hanrahan, 817
recognizing that summary judgment on any and all aspects of a partys claim including damages is proper if there are no genuine issues of material fact holding that in order for the movant to prevail on a summary judgment motion movant must either factually refute the affirmative defenses or establish that they are legally insufficient holding that when there are no genuine issues of material fact summary judgment is appropriate holding that the party seeking summary judgment must not only establish that no genuine issues of material fact exist as to the partys claims but must also either factually refute the affirmative defenses or establish that they are legally insufficient holding that a probable cause determination is appropriate for summary judgment where there are no genuine issues of material fact and no credibility issues