and a paralegal spent 0.70 hours of time in the aggregate preparing the Application, the itemized statement, the notice, the proposed order and the certificate of service. Preparation of the Application appears to have been properly apportioned between the principal and the paralegal to ensure efficiency. Moreover, because the Applicant was required to promptly file the motion to dismiss upon receiving such instruction from the Debtor, it would be unfair to deny the Applicant compensation to which it would otherwise be entitled under section 330(a). The court finds that the Applicant has demonstrated that the time spent preparing the Application was reasonable. The court must stress that the decision in this case may be the exception, not the rule. See In re Williams, 378 B.R. at 823 (<HOLDING>) (citing Collier on Bankruptcy ¶
recognizing that generally services that benefit debtor are services that facilitate completion of a case holding that an attorneys services were personal services rendered or labor done under the predecessor statute to section 38001 holding evidence of apparent authority insufficient where patient sought services of particular doctor rather than services of hospital generally holding that an attorneys cause for services rendered over a period of time accrued when his services had been completely performed holding that a person may regularly render debt collection services even if these services are not a principal purpose of his business