McFadden’s innocence or guilt. Id.; see Calderon v. Thompson, 523 U.S. 538, 558, 118 S.Ct. 1489, 140 L.Ed.2d 728 (1998) (characterizing Section 2244(b)(2)(B) as requiring a “prisoner [to] show[], among other things, that the facts underlying [his] claim establish his innocence by clear and convincing evidence”); Outlaw v. Sternes, 233 F.3d 453, 454-55 (7th Cir. 2000) (concluding that evidence of judicial bias did not satisfy Section 2244(b)(2)(B) in part because it was not relevant to the prisoner’s innocence); In re Bryan, 244 F.3d 803, 805 (11th Cir. 2000) (deeming Section 2244(b)(2)(B) not satisfied because evidence that defense counsel was an active alcoholic did not call into question the jury’s determination of guilt); Villafuerte v. Stewart, 142 F.3d 1124, 1126 (9th Cir. 1998) (<HOLDING>); cf. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200,
holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt holding that the apprendi rule was not implicated because a juvenile transfer proceeding does not involve sentencing or a determination of guilt or innocence holding that evidence of judicial bias does not satisfy section 2244b2b because it does not add to or subtract from the evidence of  guilt holding that thirdparty guilt evidence may also be excluded where it does not sufficiently connect the other person to the crime as for example where the evidence is speculative or remote or does not tend to prove or disprove a material fact in issue at the defendants trial quotation omitted holding improperly admitted evidence was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt