added). Defendant has failed to introduce any evidence to contradict its admission and Plaintiff’s assertion that Defendant learned on February 22, 1990 that Plaintiff had not obtained FDA approval to market the gloves. All of the gloves, with the exception of a shipment of $224.00 worth of gloves (which are not at issue in this matter), were shipped after February 22, 1990. Therefore, Defendant knew when it accepted the gloves that Plaintiff had not obtained FDA approval. Accordingly, even if the parties contracted for Plaintiff to obtain FDA approval, Defendant accepted the gloves despite this supposed non-conformity. Hence, Defendant is deemed to have accepted the gloves pursuant to § 672.606(1)(a). See Euroworld of California, Inc. v. Blakey, 613 F.Supp. 129, 133 (S.D.Fla.1985) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 794 F.2d 686 (11th Cir.1986). The
holding buyer liable for balance of contract price of accepted goods holding that seller was entitled to recover contract price of goods where buyer failed to make effective rejection under the ucc holding that where buyer had opportunity to inspect goods and failed to inform seller in timely manner of defects buyer deemed to have accepted goods pursuant to  672606 holding that title revested in seller under california law when buyer revoked his acceptance of goods holding that a seller could enforce an arbitration provision against a buyer even though only the buyer had signed the provision