entry of the challenged order and as a Rule 60(b) motion if filed thereafter. See Mcmanus v. District of Columbia, 545 F.Supp.2d 129, 133 (D.D.C.2008) (referencing prior version of Rule 59(e), which provided that a motion to alter or amend a judgment must be made within 10 days instead of 28 days). The defendant has not addressed whether Rule 59(e) ought to apply in this case, but the Court need not reach this issue since it concludes that reconsideration would be appropriate under Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b). In addition, the Court notes that it retains jurisdiction to consider this motion for reconsideration of its order to remand to Superior Court because the remand order has not yet been mailed to the Superior Court. See Shapiro v. Logistec USA, Inc., 412 F.3d 307, 312 (2d Cir.2005)
holding that under 28 usc  1447c and d federal jurisdiction terminates once a section 1447c remand order has been mailed to the state court holding remand based on forum selection clause not within  1447c holding remand order reviewable because crowded docket not ground for remand under  1447c holding that a proper eleventh amendment challenge strips the courts of jurisdiction for the purposes of the removal statute 28 usc  1447c holding that failure to allege plaintiffs citizenship in notice of removal amounted to defect in removal procedure under former version of 28 usc  1447c