for records because the SSA may have “inadvertently” included the five miners in the letter, “mistakenly thinking they were a part of [Appellants’] requests].” (Appellee’s Br. 25.) Regardless of whether Appellants had made the request, their claims are barred by the statute of limitations. Because this claim for review is brought under the APA and the Coal Act does not provide a statute of limitations, this action is barred unless filed within six years of the final agency action. 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a); Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Hamilton, 453 F.3d 1331, 1334 (11th Cir.2006) (“[When] the Act prescribes no statute of limitations, [ ] the general six-year statute of limitations for suits against the United States applies.”); USX Corp. v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 161, 166 (3d Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). The statute of limitations period begins to
recognizing a sixyear statute of limitations on claims filed under the coal act holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional holding sixyear statute of limitations applies to adea actions involving federal employees holding that the sixyear statute of limitations on a written contract is applicable to a cause of action based on a um policy holding that the sixyear statute of limitations in section 2501 does not apply to suits under the cda