well-established Michigan precedent, we conclude that the offense of larceny from the person in Michigan does not have as an element force, attempted use of force, or threatened use of physical force. The remaining issue is whether larceny from the person is a crime that “by its nature, presents] a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” See U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2 commentary, applic. note 1. We apply a categorical approach to determine whether a particular offense creates a serious risk of physical injury to a person. See United States v. Arnold, 58 F.3d 1117, 1121 (6th Cir.1995) (interpreting Taylor v. United States, 495 U.S. 575, 110 S.Ct. 2143, 109 L.Ed.2d 607 (1990), to apply to the Sentencing Guidelines); United States v. Kaplansky, 42 F.3d 320 (6th Cir.1994) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). “[T]he eategorical approach avoids the
holding that attempted burglary as defined by florida law is a violent felony under acca holding that kidnaping by deception under ohio law is a violent felony as a matter of law under 18 usc  924e2bii holding that vehicular manslaughter qualifies as a violent felony under section 924e2bii in that it involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another  holding that a felony driving under the influence conviction was not a violent felony under the acca because it differed from other crimes such as burglary explicitly listed in  924e2bii holding for the purposes of 18 usc  924e that being a felon in possession of a firearm is not a violent felony as defined in 18 usc  924e2b