will be denied if the change in financial condition is due to fault or voluntary wastage or dissipation of one’s talents and assets.” Noddin v. Noddin, 123 N.H. 73, 76, 455 A.2d 1051, 1053 (1983) (involving petition to modify alimony and child support where father brought about his own reduced financial condition when he lost job for stealing trade secrets). The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has stated, “[Rjemarriage, change of jobs or increased indebtedness does not necessarily justify reduction of an alimony award, especially when the change of conditions were [sic] voluntarily brought about by the payor or do [sic] not affect his ability to meet his alimony obligation.” Williams v. Williams, 444 A.2d 977, 981 (Me. 1982). See, Kiefer v. Kiefer, 671 So. 2d 710 (Ala. Civ. App. 1995) (<HOLDING>); Kinne v. Kinne, 599 So. 2d 191 (Fla. App.
holding that even if change of circumstances is shown trial court is not required to grant modification of periodic alimony award unless husband had in good faith entered into new occupation at reduced income holding that a permanent change in income constitutes a substantial change in circumstances justifying a reduction of alimony holding that former husband was not entitled to evidentiary hearing on petition to modify alimony where he failed to demonstrate substantial change in circumstances since entry of a prior order denying modification of alimony from which he did not appeal holding that final order for alimony may be modified by trial court on showing of substantial change in circumstances of either party holding that change of circumstances is not prerequisite to additional   3583e2 modification