the cause without which no recovery would have taken place.”); In re Spencer, 35 B.R. 280, 281 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1983) (finding that creditor’s actions in locating assets and opposing discharge qualified for recoupment of expenses under § 503(b)(3)(B)). This reading, however, is inconsistent with the plain language of § 503(b)(3)(B), which provides that it is the “creditor” who must “recover.” When the creditor merely provides investigative assistance or otherwise helps the trustee locate assets, it is the trustee who ultimately recovers rather than the creditor. See Cybergenics, 330 F.3d at 565 (“[I]nvestigative assistance would not implicate § 503(b)(3)(B) because the [creditors’] committee would not itself recover the property.”); In re Beale, 358 B.R. 744, 745-47 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.2006) (<HOLDING>); In re Blount, 276 B.R. 753, 763
holding that trustee may bring assigned creditor claims where estate is the real party in interest holding that a valid judgment hen is enforceable against the property of the estate recovered by the trustee holding that creditor that conducted investigations and assisted trustee in recovering assets for estate could not recoup expenses under  503b3b because it was the trustee who recovered holding that the indenture trustee has a separate contractual claim for its fees and expenses holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee