were filed under seal. 68 . The 2019 statements that were filed under seal detail the trading activity of the members of the MAG ad hoc Committee. The 2019 statements reflect that the members did in fact trade extensively in securities of MAG and securities of the other Debtors. 69 . It appears that the services of Shaked and Ruwe were billed to counsel for Phoenix. While there may be situations where employment of a professional through an attorney will permit payment of that professional as the attorney’s expense (especially if the amount involved is very small) the court is not prepared to so regard the fees of Shaked and Ruwe; rather, their cost must be considered as separate from the cost of legal services. See, e.g., In re ACandS, Inc., 297 B.R. 395, 404-05 (Bankr.D.Del.2003) (<HOLDING>) (citing In re United Companies Financial
holding that a petitioner may not circumvent the requirements of the aedpa by filing a section 2241 petition holding that an agreement was not enforceable as a section 27 compromise because the notice requirements of rule 919a  were not met holding that a subcontract agreement could not circumvent the requirements of section 327a holding that management consultant hired prepetition and retained postpetition was professional requiring appointment nonsalaried employee could not be compensated under section 327a or b holding that voting agreement that did not comply with certain notice requirements of the act was enforceable because all of the shareholders knew of the agreement and participated in the transaction in question