jurisdictional defect or (3)(a) that the procedural defect was caused by something external to the defense—that is, a cause for which the defense is not responsible—and (b) prejudice resulted from the underlying error that worked to his actual and substantial disadvantage. Id. at 731. 6 . Numerous other decisions of this Court, as well as decisions of the United States Supreme Court, similarly recognize that jurisdictional defenses are not waived by entry of a guilty plea. See, e.g., United States v. Broce, 488 U.S. 563, 569, 109 S.Ct. 757, 102 L.Ed.2d 927 (1989) (so stating); State v. Mitchell, 563 S.W.2d 18, 23 (Mo. banc 1978) (stating "that jurisdictional defects and defenses are not waived by entering a guilty plea”); Kansas City v. Stricklin, 428 S.W.2d 721, 724-25 (Mo. banc 1968) (<HOLDING>); State ex rel. Dutton v. Sevier, 336 Mo. 1236,
holding that when defects in a petition raise a question of the trial courts subject matter jurisdiction over the action the issue may properly be raised for the first time on appeal holding that jurisdiction of the subject matter  in either a civil or criminal action may be raised at any stage of the proceedings even after a plea of guilty and for the first time in the appellate court holding that lack of standing cannot be waived and may be raised for the first time by an appellate court on its own motion holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding issues related to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time