are not determined by this code. ¶ 26. This Court has held that a purchaser of land is on notice as to facts which would be disclosed upon diligent investigation, if there is “any recital sufficient to put a reasonably prudent man on inquiry as to the sufficiency of the title.” Simmons v. Mississippi Transp. Comm’n, 717 So.2d 300, 303 (Miss.1998) (quoting Bedford v. Kravis, 622 So.2d 291, 295 (Miss.1993))(quoting Florida Gas Exploration Co. v. Searcy, 385 So.2d 1293, 1296 (Miss.1980)) (quoting Dead River Fishing & Hunting Club v. Stovall, 147 Miss. 385, 395-96, 113 So. 336, 337-38 (1927)). See also Mills v. Damson Oil Corp., 686 F.2d 1096, 1101-02 (5th Cir.1982) (citing Baldwin v. Anderson, 103 Miss. 462, 60 So. 578 (1913); Bowen v. Thornton, 227 Miss. 562, 86 So.2d 505 (1956)) (<HOLDING>); Johnson v. Carter, 193 Miss. 781, 11 So.2d
holding that one who acquires legal title with notice of a prior equitable interest in the property is not a bona fide purchaser holding that under mississippi law a purchaser is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice unless there is actual notice or circumstances which would put a purchaser on inquiry notice holding that under ohio law the filing of a foreclosure complaint put the bankruptcy trustee on notice and thereby thwarted the trustees accession to the status of bona fide purchaser without notice holding that a bona fide purchaser may be considered in privity with its predecessor holding that in idaho a bona fide purchaser is one who acquires title to real property without notice actual or constructive of any outstanding adverse rights of another