WL 6231727, at *2 (6th Cir. Dec. 3, 2013) (en banc) (Nos. 12-5226, 12-5582) (<HOLDING>). We dispense with oral argument because the
holding that  10512a does not provide for individual liability because it does not include any of the phrases that so clearly provide a basis for individual liability under other subparts of lad holding professional rules do not provide basis for civil liability holding that fraudulent oral misrepresentation of the level of benefits does not provide the basis for a nonpreempted claim even though erisa may also provide no remedy holding that it is not holding that 1 the fsajs new mandatory minimums do not apply to defendants sentenced before it took effect 2  3582c2 does not provide a vehicle for circumventing that interpretation and 3 the constitution does not provide a basis for blocking it