Cleveland v. North Am. Van Lines, Inc., 154 F.R.D. 37, 38-39 (N.D.N.Y.1994); Bd. of Dirs., Water’s Edge v. Anden Group, 135 F.R.D. 129, 137 (E.D.Va.1991). Accordingly, Defendant’s requests for photocopying and photograph expenses are taxable as long as they are necessarily obtained for use in the case, and Plaintiffs do not assert that these expenses were not necessary to the case. The Court will therefore allow Defendant’s costs for photocopying and photograph expenses, as reported in its Bill of Costs. C. Travel Reimbursement Plaintiffs also challenge Defendant’s request for $128.68 as reimbursement 17 (7th Cir.1975) (finding that charges for telephone calls and postage are not ordinarily recoverable as costs); Hollenbeck v. Falstaff Brewing Corp., 605 F.Supp. 421, 439 (E.D.Mo.1984) (<HOLDING>); El-Fadl v. Central Bank of Jordan, 163 F.R.D.
holding that the costs of computerized research should be characterized not as taxable costs but as attorneys fees holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs holding that courier and messenger costs are not taxable costs holding that federal express costs telephone expenses and postage expenses did not qualify as taxable costs holding that expenses refers to costs