out its operational policy regarding how to protect students from bullying, for example, is pot barred, While the negligent infliction of emotional distress claim survives the MTCA to that same extent, the plaintiffs must plead that they suffered physical harm resulting from the emotional distress. To recover for the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress, a plaintiff must prove: “(1) negligence; (2) emotional distress; (3) causation; (4) physical harm manifested by objective symptomatology; and (5) that a reasonable person would have suffered emotional distress under the circumstances of the case.” Payton v. Abbott Labs, 386 Mass. 540, 437 N.E.2d 171, 181 (1982); see also Rodriguez v. Cambridge Hous. Auth., 443 Mass. 697, 823 N.E.2d 1249, 12 , 450 N.E.2d 581, 589-90 (1983) (<HOLDING>); Miles v. Edward O. Tabor, M.D., Inc., 387
holding that ownership of vehicle and presence at scene of crash sufficiently corroborated appellants statement holding that a mother who did not see sons injured body until twentyfour hours after an accident at funeral home was not entitled to recover holding that while a mother could consent to a search of her sons room she did not have authority to consent to a search of a locked footlocker within the room holding that mother who did not learn of her sons death in airplane crash until seven hours after the crash could not recover holding that husbands imprudent investments which lost their value in 1987 stock market crash not adequate justification for inequitable distribution of marital assets