person’s duty to the enterprise. Id. (emphasis added). This section also . does not preclude Rian’s claim for indemnity because he has not been “found liable to the enterprise.” Id. Indeed, the jury was not asked whether Rian should, have any liability to the Partnership. Rather, all of the jury questions asking about Rian’s conduct related to alleged liability to Dr. Cravens, not to the Partnership. And in response to the only question asked of the jury about Rian’s conduct toward the Partnership, the jury .found that he acted in good faith. Therefore, Rian has not been found liable to the Partnership, and section 8.102(b)(3)(A) does not preclude his claim for indemnity. See id. The Partnership next argues that there is no evidence that Rian actually incurred attorneys’ fees in the 9) (<HOLDING>). Section 74.351(b)(1) of the civil practice
holding state law malpractice claim against a physician was preempted where the physician acting as the plan administrator denied a thallium stress test as a plan benefit holding that insured may recover attorneys fees from insurer where insurer acts in bad faith recognizing physician assistant as agent of the supervising physician holding physician entitled to recover attorneys fees actually paid by malpractice insurer because physician was personally liable in the first instance holding physician in action based on illegal cavity search to standard of a reasonable physician