in the United States based on the information provided by the RSCAC to duplicate the RSCAC’s experiments. See Solvay, 622 F.3d at 1371-72. In Holmwood v. Sugavanam, 948 F.2d 1236, 1238-39 (Fed.Cir.1991), an inventor who conceived and reduced to practice a fungicide abroad was found to have successfully reduced the invention to practice in the United States for purposes of § 102(g) when his assignee sent the fungicide from Germany to a United States affiliate to verify the positive test results. The Federal Circuit held that the fungicide was reduced to practice in the United States as a result of the tests performed here, which showed that the fungicide worked for its intended purpose. Id.; see also Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co., 560 F.Supp.2d 835, 865 (N.D.Cal.2008) (<HOLDING>). The court concludes that the RSCAC’s
holding that the crime of bringing aliens to the united states is complete when the initial transporter who brings the aliens to the united states ceases to transport them holding that the fourteenth amendment which makes persons bom in the united states and subject to its jurisdiction citizens of the united states and requires that representatives be apportioned among the states based on population excluding indians not taxed did not make an indian a citizen of the united states holding that an initial reduction to practice outside the united states is not fatal to abbotts attempt to meet its burden of production where the invention was later successfully performed in the united states holding that prosecution of defendant in the united states for hostage taking based on acts committed outside the united states did not violate due process holding that the commandant of the united states disciplinary barracks and the united states are identical parties