sought judicial review. After a hearing, the district court entered an order on October 14,2014, affirming the decision .of the commissioner. Evenson appealed and we retained the appeal. II. Standard of Review. The first issue in this case asks us to engage in statutory interpretation to determine whether an employer’s contribution to an employee’s 401k plan is included in the calculation of weekly benefits. We review the commissioner’s interpretation of Iowa Code chapter 85 for errors at law. Iowa Code § 17A.19(10)(c) (2011); see Iowa Ins. Inst v, Core Grp. of Iowa Ass’n for Justice, 867 N.W.2d 58, 65 (Iowa 2015). We have declined to give deference to the commissioner’s interpretation of various provisions included in chapter 86. Waldinger Corp. v. Mettler, 817 N,W.2d 1, 7 (Iowa 2012) (<HOLDING>); Neal v. Annett Holdings, Inc., 814 N.W.2d
holding that arbitrator had authority to choose between suspension and termination where the authority was vested in the company to suspend andor discharge holding that the commissioner of the department of pensions and security had statutory authority to reassign state employees to the county level holding that the commissioner was not vested with interpretive authority for section 85341 holding grant of authority to an agency to adopt rules necessary to carry out this chapter clearly vested in the agency authority to interpret a statute holding that the commissioner did not have the authority to interpret the phrase suitable work under section 85333