§ 844(i). Buildings offered for rent and those from which goods and services are sold fall within § 844(i)’s compass because they serve commercial purposes, whether or not the commercial enterprises that use them have a profit motive. Russell v. United States, 471 U.S. 858, 862, 105 S.Ct. 2455, 85 L.Ed.2d 829 (1985) (rental property); United States v. Rayborn, 312 F.3d 229, 234 (6th Cir.2002) (church building used to record radio messages to be broadcast out of state on commercial radio); United States v. Sherlin, 67 F.3d 1208, 1213 (6th Cir.1995) (private college dormitory); United States v. Terry, 257 F.3d 366, 369-70 (4th Cir.2001) (church building with daycare center); cf. Camps Newfound/Owatonna, Inc. v. Town of Harrison, 520 U.S. 564, 584, 117 S.Ct. 1590, 137 L.Ed.2d 852 (1997) (<HOLDING>). But see United States v. Lamont, 330 F.3d
holding that the statute as applied violates the commerce clause holding that dormant commerce clause complaint by instate resident against municipality failed on merits because challenged rule regulated evenhandedly and did not burden interstate commerce holding that state restrictions on electronic license plates might constitute an undue burden on interstate commerce so the claim fell within the zone of interests protected by the dormant commerce clause holding that the dormant commerce clause applies to the notforprofit sector of the economy holding that state regulations of intrastate wildlife are within dormant commerce clause