movement of passengers or property, or both, by rail, regardless of ownership or an agreement concerning use; and “(B) services related to that movement, including receipt, delivery, elevation, transfer in transit,' refrigeration, icing, ventilation, storage, handling, and interchange of passengers and property....” The definition of transportation as used in the ICCTA is expansive; the language identifying the Surface Transportation Board’s exclusive jurisdiction over transportation by rail carriers is unambiguous and precise. .Congress specifically provided that the Surface Transportation Board has exclusive jurisdiction over railroad operations and unequivocally preempted remedies otherwise provided by federal or state law. Cf. Pace v. CSX Transp., Inc., 613 F.3d 1066 (11th Cir.2010)(<HOLDING>); Friberg v. Kansas City S. Ry., 267 F.3d 439,
holding that the iccta preempted statelaw claims alleging tortious interference and seeking punitive damages holding that the iccta preempted statelaw nuisance claim with respect to operation of side track holding that the iccta preempted statelaw tortiousinterference claim holding that the iccta preempted statelaw nuisance claim with regard to railway traffic holding that the iccta preempted statelaw negligence and nuisance claims intended to interfere with railroads operation of switchyard