Republic about First Financial’s transactions, and not once did the Lomaz brothers argue that First Financial was a distinct company unrelated to Pacific. Indeed, instead of denying any participation in the aborted shipments, the Lomazes requested that Midwest be substituted as the importer of record. The district court did not abuse its discretion in discrediting Lomaz’s defense that Pacific is not the alter ego of First Financial in light of Midwest’s repeated attempts, at the behest of Larry and Douglas Lomaz, to relieve First Financial of its damage obligation to Customs. In light of the contradictory statements and incredible defenses presented by Pacific, we find that the district court also did not abuse its discretion in crediting Buehl’s contemporaneous account of s ir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Motions under Rule 60(b)(6) must be made
holding that notice to counsel may be waived recognizing that immunity may be waived holding that the law in this circuit is that errors of law are cognizable under rule 60b holding attorneys failure to object does not warrant rule 60b relief holding that defenses under rule 60b may be waived