Accordingly, there are no Category 2 licenses currently available, meaning that, at this point in time, there will be no future Category 2 licensing proceedings scheduled. For any such proceeding to be scheduled in the future, the PGCB must revoke the Category 2 license it awarded to either HSP or PEDP. While there is a pending proceeding before the PGCB seeking to revoke PEDP’s license, the outcome of the same is in doubt. Consequently, since the occurrence of any future licensing proceedings is less than certain, to base standing based upon the same would require us to engage in the type of mere conjecture that has been consistently proscribed by the United States Supreme Court. See e.g., MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 137, 127 S.Ct. 764, 166 L.Ed.2d 604 (2007) (<HOLDING>); Vermont Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel.
holding that standing will not lie where matters remain conjectural or hypothetical recognizing the general rule that an appellate court will not address matters that were not raised or decided in the trial court   holding mandamus will lie to prevent trial court from exercising jurisdiction it does not have even if there is adequate remedy by appeal holding that standing existed holding that hypothetical injury was insufficient for standing