365, 383 (3d Cir.2003). 34 . Kurz v. Philadelphia Elec. Co., 96 F.3d 1544, 1553 (3d Cir.1996) (citing Smith v. Hartford Ins. Grp., 6 F.3d 131, 142 (3d Cir. 1993)). 35 . Id. 36 . -U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1866, 179 L.Ed.2d 843(2011). 37 . Amara, 131 S.Ct. at 1881. 38 . Proposed amended complaint, ¶ 49. 39 . Id. ¶ 19-20, 27-59, 153-154, 159; 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a) requires fiduciaries to act "with care, skill, prudence and diligence.” 40 . Id. ¶ 75, 81-2, 85-9, 174. 41 . Id., ¶59. 42 . Amara, 131 S.Ct. at 1881 (citations omitted). 43 . The notice defects caused plaintiffs harm by the diminished value of the beneficiaries’ interest in a pension plan. 44 . Defendants cite Tolson v. Avondale Indus., Inc., 141 F.3d 604, 610 (5th Cir.1998); Moore v. Raytheon Corp., 314 F.Supp.2d 658, 664 (N.D.Tex.2004) (<HOLDING>) Barrack v. UNUM Am. Life Ins. Co., 409
holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea holding that a plaintiff seeking individual relief under erisa  502a3 in contrast to  502a2 which allows relief on behalf of a plan is required to prove an individual loss holding that claims for equitable relief under  502a3 are only available when a plaintiff has no other relief under erisa holding that equitable relief under rico is available only to the government holding that equitable relief under  502a3 does not include compensatory and punitive damages