crops to be planted, grown or produced on [the] property in the future.” Sw. Ga. Prod. Credit Ass’n v. James, 180 Ga.App. 795, 350 S.E.2d 786, 788 (1986). Under Georgia law, a crop disaster payment is the result of a “loss[ ] ... or damage to” crops “to be planted, grown, or produced.” O.C.G.A. § 11-9-102(a)(63)(D); Sw. Ga. Prod. Credit Ass’n, 350 S.E.2d at 788. Bracewell’s crop disaster payment is “proceeds” under the Georgia Uniform Commercial Code. Bracewell received the payment for “the loss of ... or damage to” his crops. O.C.G.A. § ll-9-102(a)(63)(D). Bracewell’s payment is “from property of the estate,” see 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(6), because the expected crop yield was a levia-ble and cognizable property interest under Georgia law. See Sw. Ga. Prod. Credit Ass’n, 350 S.E.2d at 787 (<HOLDING>). Thanks in part to the creditors seeking
holding courts must look to the law of the state in which the security interest was created to determine if creditor retains a purchase money security interest despite refinancing holding that a creditors security interest in all crops now growing or may hereafter be planted grown or produced within seven years from the date hereof and all proceeds therefrom granted the creditor a right to receive money from a reduced yield even though no profit was made internal quotation marks omitted holding that the state has a compelling interest in protecting the citizens of minnesota from those who pose a severe threat to their health and safety citation omitted internal quotation marks omitted holding that a foreign entity without property or presence in this country has no constitutional rights under the due process clause or otherwise internal quotation marks omitted holding that an expert may base his or her opinions and inferences on facts andor data perceived by or made known to the expert at or before the hearing internal quotation marks omitted