to the people of Puerto Rico,’ puts Commonwealth funds at risk when University funds are at risk.”)(internal citations and quotations omitted). Thus, while the First Circuit established a new test for evaluating Eleventh Amendment immunity, the result for the UPR is consistent with the First Circuit’s vast prior precedent also affording Eleventh Amendment protection. Toledo, 454 F.3d at 31; Vizcarrondo, 139 F.Supp.2d at 206; Panzardi-Santiago, 200 F.Supp.2d at 24; Culebras Enterprises Corp., 813 F.2d at 516. Representatives of the UPR are immune from suit in their official capacity under the Eleventh Amendment immunity afforded to the UPR as an “arm” of the state. See Vizcarrondo, 139 F.Supp.2d at 206; see also Montalvo-Padilla v. Univ. of P.R., 492 F.Supp.2d 36, 43 (D.P.R.2007) (<HOLDING>). In the instant matter, the Individual
holding that eleventh amendment does not bar suits for prospective injunctive relief against state officials in their official capacity holding that the eleventh amendment extends beyond the states themselves to state agents and state instrumentalities holding that the protection afforded by the eleventh amendment extends not only to the states themselves but also to their instrumentalities and government officials acting in that capacity holding that the eleventh amendment protects both states and state officials acting in their official capacity from suits brought pursuant to 42 usc  1983 holding that states and state officials acting in their official capacity are not persons under  1983