was $500.00. However, a few months later the Texas Constitution was amended and the jurisdictional minimum was deleted. As amended Article V, section 8 now provides, in pertinent part: District Court jurisdiction consists of exclusive, appellate, and original jurisdic tion of all actions, proceedings, and remedies, except in cases where exclusive, appellate, or original jurisdiction may be conferred by this constitution or other law on some other court, tribunal, or administrative body. Tex. Const, art. V, § 8. After the constitutional amendment, some courts of appeals have determined the jurisdictional limit is $200.01, while others have continued to require a $500.00 minimum amount in controversy. Compare Acreman v. Sharp, 282 S.W.3d 251, 255-56 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2009, no pet.)(<HOLDING>), Ramirez v. Dietz, No. 07-04-0108-CV, 2006 WL
holding that court of claims has jurisdiction over actions for breach of standard contract holding that district court can exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a coplaintiff claim that fails to meet the amount in controversy requirement holding over holding that the court may presume it has jurisdiction over a case once the plaintiffs initial burden of establishing jurisdiction has been satisfied holding express language of government code and constitution provides trial court has jurisdiction over case in which amount in controversy was over 20000