talking about everything that this guy said on the stand, right? Could he have said it in just a couple of minutes? Sorry. Please give me the death penalty. The end. But instead he spends almost four hours— [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Renew the same objection, Your Honor. THE COURT: Overruled. Appellant contends that when the prosecutor accused Appellant of being a con man because of the length of time he was on the stand, she was striking at appellant over the shoulders of defense counsel because the attack was really a criticism of counsel’s decision to have Appellant testify for that length of time. This is an inaccurate characterization of the prosecutor’s argument, which was directed not at defense counsel, but at appellant himself. Mosley v. State, 983 S.W.2d 249, 259 (Tex.Crim.App.1998) (<HOLDING>). Defense counsel failed to object the first
holding that defense counsel opened the door to the prosecutions questioning of the defendant about prior convictions when defense counsel asked a prosecution witness whether he was aware that the defendant was  a convicted felon holding that a prosecutor runs a risk of improperly striking at a defendant over the shoulder of counsel when the argument is made in terms of defense counsel personally and when the argument explicitly impugns defense counsels character holding that defense counsel opened the door to the states rebuttal remarks when defense counsel raised the issue in his closing argument holding that defendant had waived any defense of improper venue when he made the argument only after filing a motion for summary judgment holding that defense counsel opened the door to response by prosecutor when he tried to turn defendants failure to testify to his advantage in closing argument