it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to comply with this rule, the court may order such party to permit the discovery or inspection, grant a continuance, or prohibit the party from introducing evidence not disclosed, or it may enter such other order as it deems just under the circumstances. Utah R.Crim. P. 16(g). Rule 16(g) thus provides several remedies to mitigate prejudice caused by unanticipated testimony, including a continuance. When the prosecution introduces unexpected testimony, a defendant “essentially waive[s] his right to later claim error” if the defendant fails to request a continuance or seek other appropriate relief under Rule 16(g). State v. Larson, 775 P.2d 415, 418 (Utah 1989). See also State v. Griffiths, 752 P.2d 879, 883 (Utah 1988) (<HOLDING>); State v. Christofferson, 793 P.2d 944, 948
holding that the defendant waived any argument on the issue by failing to oppose a motion to dismiss holding that by failing to move for continuance defendant waived relief under rule 16g  by not making timely efforts to mitigate or eliminate the prejudice caused by the prosecutors conduct holding that statutory grounds for recusal can be waived both by failing to object and by failing to assert error on appeal holding that the defendant waived an argument by failing to raise it in his appellants brief holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court