- S.W.3d -, -, 2013 WL 5470089, at *6 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Sept. 30, 2013, orig. proceeding); Connolly v. Gasmire, 257 S.W.3d 831, 839 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2008, no pet.). 6 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. §§ governs remedies and procedural matters). 29 . See Pate, 2003 WL 22682422, at * 1-2. 30 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445-46; Schwartzott, 403 S.W.3d at 498 n. 4; Trojacek, 2009 WL 909591, at *3; Saudi, 176 S.W.3d at 113. 31 . See Tex. Bus. Orgs.Code Ann. § 21.562; Arkoma Basin Exploration Co., 249 S.W.3d at 387; In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., 2013 WL 5470089, at *6; Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839; Pate, 2003 WL 22682422, at *1-2. 32 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus., 852 S.W.2d at 445-46; Trojacek, 2009 WL 909591, at *3; Somers, 295 S.W.3d at 8, 10, 13. 33 (<HOLDING>); Cameron Appraisal Dist. v. Rourk, 194 S.W.3d
holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act holding that where one plaintiff has standing we need not consider whether the other individual and corporate plaintiffs have standing to maintain the suit holding that stepgrandfathers suit should be dismissed because he lacked a justiciable interest and standing due to his failure to satisfy the requirements of the applicable standing statute in the family code holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue holding that troxel opinion did not affect issue of grandparent standing because texas family code standing statute does not overrule parental presumption