owned by one party and the house by another.”)(citing Cullers, 1 S.W. at 315). 11 . See Gann v. Montgomery, 210 S.W.2d 255, 259 (Tex.Civ.App.Fort Worth 1948, writ ref'd n.r.e.)("[T]o be exempt as part of the homestead, [mobile homes] must be part of the exempt realty.”). See also Minnehoma Financial Co. v. D ll.1997); In re Herd, 176 B.R. 312, 313-14 (Bankr.D.Conn.1994); In re McMahon, 60 B.R. 632, 634 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.1986). 14 . In re Scudder, 97 B.R. 617, 618-19 (Bankr.S.D.Ala.1989)(allowing a houseboat to be claimed under Alabama's homestead exemption statute, which provides for exemptions of "mobile home[s] or similar dwelling[s].") 15 . In re McMahon, 60 B.R. at 634. 16 . In re Mead, 255 B.R. 80, 84-85 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2000). 17 . In re Laube, 152 B.R. 260, 262-63 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1993)(<HOLDING>) (citation omitted). 18 . In re Kiedaisch, Bk.
holding that the condominium association was not a thirdparty beneficiary of contracts between the owner and contractor of the condominium building and between the general contractor and the subcontractors holding that where appellants owned and resided upon contiguous 60acre rural farm and used 18 acres as a mobile home park 18acre tract was part of the rural homestead holding as matter of law that mobile home with wheels removed placed on blocks and hooked to lights and water is trailer within scope of covenant proscribing trailers used as temporary or permanent residences holding operable semi truck cab used by professional driver as homestead despite statutes description of dwelling as a building condominium mobile home house trailer or cooperative holding that an assembler of a mobile home is deemed to be a manufacturer of a finished product that is the mobile home for purposes of determining the applicability of the affirmative causalrelation defense under the aemld