28; Weiss, 176 F.Supp.3d at 285; In re Terrorist Attacks, 349 F.Supp.2d at 810-11. There is no question that Facebook has the required contacts with the Unite,d States as a whole. The Force Plaintiffs allege — and Facebook does not dispute— that Facebook is incorporated in Delaware and has its principal place of business in California. (Force FAC ¶ 19.) As a United States resident, Facebook could hardly argue that it lacks the required contacts with the country as a whole. Mariash, 496 F.2d at 1143 (“[W]here, as here, the defendants reside within the territorial boundaries of the United States, the ‘minimal contacts,’ required to justify the federal government’s exercise of power over them, are present.”); cf. Daimler AG v. Bauman, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 746, 760, 187 L.Ed.2d 624 (2014) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the court, finds that exercising
holding that for a domestic corporation the foreign principal place of business does not count holding that the location of a corporations principal place of business for diversity purposes is the state where the corporation has its headquarters or nerve center holding that if a domestic corporations principal place of business is abroad the foreign principal place of business cannot be considered for diversity jurisdiction purposes holding that a corporation is fairly regarded at home and so amenable to personal jurisdiction for suits relating to all of its activities including those outside the forum in its principal place of business and place of incorporation holding that for diversity purposes a national bank is  a citizen of  the state of its principal place of business and the state listed in its organizational certificate