the BIA’s decision as the final failed to take his medical condition into account in denying his request for a continuance. To the contrary, the IJ expressly considered Maldonado-Reyes’s request for an extension based on his medical condition and denied that request because the medical condition did not provide a basis for remaining in the United States. (A.R. 61-62). Maldonado-Reyes further contends that the denial of a continuance amounted to a deprivation of his right to counsel, violating his due process rights. The denial of a continuance is discretionary and therefore cannot form the basis for a due process claim. Abu-Khaliel, 436 F.3d at 635. Regardless, Maldonado-Reyes cannot demonstrate prejudice, as discussed below. See Gishta v. Gonzales, 404 F.3d 972, 979 (6th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Maldonado-Reyes also asserts that the IJ
holding petitioner must show prejudice to prevail on due process claim holding petitioner must demonstrate error and substantial prejudice to prevail on a due process claim holding that an alien must establish that he was prejudiced by the alleged error in order to prevail on a due process claim holding that an alien raising a due process challenge to removal proceedings must show error and substantial prejudice holding that an alien must show error and substantial prejudice in order to prevail on a due process claim