May 2000 coup, poor economic conditions, and his sympathy for Indo-Fijian family members. Kedei never mentioned his mother’s Solomon Islander background or his family’s threats. His testimony that he completed the asylum application without an attorney does not provide an adequate explanation for the failure to mention that his family threatened him repeatedly over the course of thirteen years. This is not a case where discrepancies may be attributed to an unscrupulous preparer, or where the asylum application is lacking only in detail. See Alvarez-Santos v. INS, 332 F.3d 1245, 1254 (9th Cir.2003) (explaining that inconsistencies due to an unscrupulous preparer do not provide an adequate basis for an adverse credibility finding); Aguilera-Cota v. INS, 914 F.2d 1375, 1382 (9th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). Kedei filled out his asylum application
holding that substantial evidence supported an adverse credibility finding where the petitioners two asylum applications differed significantly regarding past persecution holding that omissions in petitioners asylum application which go to the heart of the claim support adverse credibility finding holding that in light of an applicants omission of various relevant facts from his asylum application substantial evidence supported the ijs adverse credibility determination holding that the failure to list two collateral incidents on an asylum application did not provide substantial evidence for an adverse credibility finding holding that an adverse credibility determination is sufficient to deny asylum