offenses pursuant to Indiana Code §§ 9-30-5-1 and 9-80-5-2. Several decisions of the Court of Appeals have likewise applied statutes prohibiting operating a vehicle while intoxicated to driving on private property. See, e.g., Chilcutt v. State, 544 N.E.2d 856, 859 (Ind.Ct.App.1989) (applying statute to driving on private property in a rural area, emphasizing State's strong interest in protecting the health and safety of its citizens, and referring not only to third persons but also "the danger the defendant presented to himself"); Huey v. State, 503 N.E.2d 623, 626 (Ind.Ct.App.1987) (affirming conviction of intoxicated driver of car stopped at a gas station, and holding statute applies to "drunk drivers on private property"); State v. Carter, 424 N.E.2d 158, 160 (Ind.Ct.App.1981) (<HOLDING>). The defendant's brief makes a passing
holding that driving records were nontestimonial holding that driving while intoxicated is not a violent felony pursuant to 18 usc  924e2b holding a felony conviction for driving while intoxicated dwi may be a crime of violence holding that misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated constitutes a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a holding that statute prohibiting driving while intoxicated applied to defendant driving on a private parking lot