[of openness after a governmental actor fails to timely request an AG opinion] can only be overcome by a compelling demonstration that the information should not be released to the public, as might be the case if the information is deemed confidential by some other source of law, or if an exception designed to protect the interest of a third party is applicable.”). 40 . Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 552.352; see also Tex. Att'y Gen. ORD-676 (2002) ("Section [552.101] ... refers to information that a governmental body may not choose to release, and the improper disclosure of which results in criminal penalties under the [Act], Thus, when section 552.101 applies, the [Act] prohibits the governmental body from disclosing the information.”) (footnotes omitted). 41 . Jackson, 243 S.W.3d at 757-58 (<HOLDING>). 42 . Indus. Found. of the S. v. Tex. Indus.
holding that request for information concerning a drivers license ownership of a vehicle insurance information appellants destination and the purpose of a trip are all proper inquiries after a traffic violation stop recognizing relevance of information and that need for this information outweighs the burden to appellants recognizing that there is an important privacy interest in corporate financial documents the court agrees that the information can be protected therefore the court  required that the information be disclosed pursuant to a confidentiality order only to be used in connection with this litigation holding that information required for participation in a voluntary program is information that a party was obliged to furnish holding that transportation code section 521051 prohibits disclosure of information in basic drivers license record file and because tdps demonstrated that statute required tdps to maintain confidentiality of this information tdps satisfied burden to show compelling reason to withhold information