not exclusively. The evidence before the district court supports its conclusion that geographic scoping is an original act of selection. Besides BAP-CO’s evidence, Donnelley presented evidence on the uniqueness of its different scoping choice to cover the greater Miami area in two North and South Miami regions. In addition, Donnelley elicited testimony from Louis Sudholz on Donnelley’s decision to cover the geographic region between Dallas and Fort Worth in a “Mid-City” directory. Based on such evidence' of how classified publishers could easily select geographic regions that do not strictly follow the boundaries of cities, it is clear that the selection-of a geographic region is not “practically inevitable.” See Feist, 499 U.S. at -, 111 S.Ct. at 1297, 113 L.Ed.2d at 380 (<HOLDING>). The evidence before the district court also
recognizing that the determination is an equitable one holding that it is not recognizing that it is inevitable that law enforcement officials will in some cases reasonably but mistakenly conclude that probable cause is present and  that in such cases those officials  should not be held personally liable holding that an envelope found in a bedroom containing blank birth certificates blank identification cards checks for accounts held in different names and bank statements for accounts held in different names supported probable cause justifying a plain view seizure of the documents recognizing that the alphabetizing of names in a white pages is an ageold practice that is unoriginal and practically inevitable