the record. 6 . The Debtor’s accountant sought leave to withdraw on April 20, 2011; leave was granted on July 27, 2011. 7 . Additionally, the record reflects that 58 days elapsed between the September 6, 2011 filing of the Debtor's motion for extension of time to obtain counsel and its November 3, 2011 denial. Another 19 days passed before the court dismissed the case on November 22, 2011. Thus, the Debtor effectively received 77 out of the 90 days he originally sought, and nonetheless failed to hire an attorney. 8 . But cf. In re Moog, 774 F.2d 1073, 1075-76 (11th Cir.1985) (ruling § 1112(b)’s explicit language and legislative history indicate bankruptcy court without power to dismiss sua sponte); Gusam Rest. Corp. v. Speciner (In re Gusam Rest. Coip.), 737 F.2d 274, 276 (2d Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). 9 . Although the bankruptcy court
holding that sua sponte grant of summary judgment without notice to the parties constitutes reversible error holding that rule 60b bars sua sponte relief holding that a court may sua sponte take judicial notice of its docket holding bankruptcy court without power to convert sua sponte due to  1112bs party in interest requirement holding that the court can raise res judicata sua sponte even on appeal