22, 1986); State v. Williams, 88 Ohio St.3d 513, 728 N.E.2d 342, 348 (2000). 7 . See Sheila A. Campbell, Battling Sex Offenders: Is Megan’s Law an Effective Means of Achieving Public Safety?, 19 Seton Hall Legis. J. 519, 535 (1995). 8 .See id. 9 . For a list of enumerated sex offenses in South Carolina, see S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-430(0(1). 10 . S.C.Code Ann. § 23-3-430(D) provides, "Upon conviction, adjudication of delinquency, guilty plea, or plea of nolo contendere of a person of an offense not listed in this article, the presiding judge may order as a condition of sentencing that the person be included in the sex offender registry if good cause is shown by the solicitor.” 11 . Appellant is not part of a suspect class. See e.g., Cutshall v. Siindquist, 193 F.3d 466, 483 (6th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). 12 . The Constitution of South Carolina
holding that it is error to certify class when named class representatives are not members of the class they purport to represent holding that undocumented aliens cannot be treated as a suspect class holding that putative class members are not parties to an action prior to class certification holding that convicted sex offenders are not a suspect class recognizing that strict scrutiny applies to facial discrimination against a suspect class