agreement retains language proposed in section 329 of the Senate bill limiting review of certain elements in the land management plan for the Tongass National Forest.” H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 108-10, at 1032 (2003); 149 Cong. Rec. S340-05, at S588 (daily ed. Jan 15, 2003) (Senate report submitted by Sen. Stevens) ("Limits the review of certain aspects of the Tongass Land Management Plan.”). 19 . Alternatively, even if Congress intended in the 2003 Appropriations Act to preclude judicial review of the entire 1997 Plan, we would retain jurisdiction over NRDC's appeal because appropriations acts are generally only “in force during the fiscal year of the appropriation and do not work a permanent change in the substantive law.” Seattle Audubon Soc’y v. Evans, 952 F.2d 297, 304 (9th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). To rebut this presumption takes a clear
holding that inadequate notice did not trigger plans time bar for administrative review holding that a rider that limited judicial review of national forest management plans expired at the end of the appropriation year holding that in its review of the irs exercise of discretion the court is limited to a review of the administrative record holding that where the statutory scheme is clear the inquiry should end holding that because here the statutes in issue provide for judicial review via citizen suit provisions yet do not set forth a standard for that review judicial review is limited to apa review on the administrative record