of a written disposition subject to a subsequent challenge by motion in the trial court. We therefore approve the outcome of the Fourth District’s decision in N.C., and disapprove the certified conflict decisions: A.L., S.D.W., C.A., T.A.R. and L.M., to the extent that they are inconsistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. PARIENTE, C.J., with WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, C.J., concurs with an opinion, in which ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., concur. 1 . In 2000, Florida's Legislature amended section 985.231 (l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes, and substituted the term "conditional release” for the term "aftercare.” See ch.2000-135, § 31, Laws of Fla. 2 . The Fourth District certified conflict with: A.L. v. State, 790 So.2d 1149, 1150 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (<HOLDING>); S.D.W. v. State, 746 So.2d 1232, 1234 (Fla.
holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement holding that the trial courts oral pronouncement must conform to the written judgment holding that a written provision requiring that al write a letter of apology to the victim be stricken from the written judgment because it was not included in the oral pronouncement