inventory and that the post-fire fair market value of AHC’s smoke-damaged inventory was $0, to the extent these findings include the 3.7% of AHC’s inventory consisting of completed, stage-three hats, the credible evidence supporting the findi gnizing that replacement valuation is proper to compensate an owner for damage to personal property when no market value exists for the personal property damaged); Pringle, 629 S.W.2d at 157 (same). AHC elected application of the replacement-value damage model, and the trial court correctly concluded in conclusion of law number 10 that a replacement valuation applied to AHC’s smoke-damaged inventory. See, e.g., Pasadena State Bank, 149 Tex. at 50, 228 S.W.2d at 128; Int’l-Great N. R.R. Co., 46 S.W.2d at 670; Celanese Ltd., 75 S.W.3d at 598 (<HOLDING>); Pringle, 629 S.W.2d at 157 (same). We
recognizing different factual situations may dictate application of a different valuation ie other than fair market value of the damage to the property holding that fair market value was proper measure of damages for stock brokers breach of margin agreement caused by sale of plaintiffs shares without authorization noting that generally speaking fair market value is proper measure of damages for breach of contract relating to sale of goods which have an ascertamable value on the market holding that a states law is materially different from california law if application of the other states law leads to a different result holding that motor vehicle to be retained by chapter 13 debtor should be valued at the price the debtor could get for it in a free and open market ie its fair market value holding that evidence of contamination is relevant and admissible on the issue of market value in an eminent domain valuation trial