is simply an aggregation of the credit limits of stolen credit card numbers, despite no evidence that Diallo intended to cause that amount of loss; and (2) the District Court incorrectly increased his offense level by four levels based on a finding that there were over fifty victims when only thirty victims had suffered an actual loss. The Government has conceded that the number-of-victims enhancement is improper because the applicable Sentencing Guidelines require that victims must have suffered an actual loss, as compared to subsequent Guidelines which additionally included individuals “whose means of identification [were] used unlawfully or without authority.” U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1 app. n. 4(E) (effective Nov. 1, 2009); see also United States v. Kennedy, 554 F.3d 415, 419 (3d Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Corvado, 53 F.3d 620, 622
holding that measure of restitution is victims loss not defendants gain holding that inmates must demonstrate an actual injury holding that the amount of restitution is limited to the victims actual losses  holding that loss of an arm includes loss of the hand holding that victims must have suffered an actual pecuniary loss