United States v. Allen, 235 F.3d 482, 487-88 (10th Cir.2000). 22 . Id. at 488. 23 . Id. 24 . See Dunn, 653 P.2d at 1079. 25 . AS 11.56.800(a)(1)(B)G). 26 . See, eg., Snider v. State, 958 P.2d 1114, 1118 (Alaska App.1998); State v. Kendall, 794 P.2d 114, 117 (Alaska App.1990) trial court should analyze the objective information which the police had at the time when they made an arrest in determining whether there was probable cause to make that arrest."). 27 . See, eg., United States v. Robinson, 536 F.3d 874, 877-78 (8th Cir.2008); Batemon v. United States, 203 Fed.Appx. 723, 725-26 (7th Cir.2006); People v. Clayton, 18 Cal.App.4th 440, 22 Cal. Rptr.2d 371, 374 (1993); State v. Edwards, 98 Wis.2d 367, 297 N.W.2d 12, 14 (1980). 28 . Cf. Bell v. State, 668 P.2d 829, 837 (Alaska App.1983) (<HOLDING>). 29 . See Fleener v. State, 686 P.2d 730,
holding that untimely notice a warrants execution did not justify the suppression of evidence in the absence of prejudice or bad faith holding that suppression of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process when evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution holding that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution holding that suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused  violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution holding that the suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution