v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe R. Co., 364 F.3d 789, 791 (6th Cir.2004) (thirty-seven day suspension without pay was sufficient to constitute an adverse employment action); Myers v. Mothers Work, Inc., 2009 WL 513916, at *2 (S.D.Tex. Mar.2, 2009) (“Suspensions without pay are adverse employment actions.”); Johnson v. Alice Indep. Sch. Dist., No.CIV.A. C-12-170, 2012 WL 4068678, at *3 (S.D.Tex. Sept. 14, 2012) (“While administrative leave, by itself, may not constitute an adverse employment action, being placed on administrative leave without pay does”). And, the courts have determined that even a short-term suspension without pay is sufficiently adverse to constitute an adverse employment action. See, e.g., Lovejoy-Wilson v. NOCO Motor Fuel, Inc., 263 F.3d 208, 224 (2d Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); Beshir v. Jewell, 961 F.Supp.2d 114, 125 n. 5
holding that investigatory suspension with pay was not adverse employment action holding that denial of overtime pay is an adverse employment action because it relates to  compensation holding that a oneweek suspension without pay is an adverse employment action even if pay is later reimbursed because the plaintiff at least suffered the loss of the use  of her wages for a time recognizing that unequal pay is an adverse action holding that suspension with pay was not adverse employment action