which ‘is remedial in nature and therefore must be construed liberally in order to best serve Congress’ intent.’”). Here, Legg alleges that VMG instructed him to send the message “STOP ALL” to stop receiving text messages. DE 1 ¶ 26. Legg alleges that he sent the message “STOP ALL” to VMG. DE 1 ¶27. In other words, Legg alleges that he took the steps VMG had established for consumers to communicate a desire to stop receiving messages. Taken in a light most favorable to Legg, the Court finds these facts sufficient to plead that Legg revoked his consent to receive text messages from VMG, and accordingly that messages postdating the revocation were sent without his consent. See Munro v. King Broad. Co., No. 13-1308, 2013 WL 6185233, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168308 (W.D.Wash. Nov. 26, 2013) (<HOLDING>). The Court also rejects VMG’s contention that
holding that service is not avoided by service on a partys attorney as service on an attorney is ineffective unless he has been authorized to accept such service holding that the forceable stop at issue was an investigatory stop rather than an arrest holding that where weather alert service instructed user to reply stop to cease receiving text messages users message of stop to service was sufficient to create factual issue with regard to revocation of consent holding that an individuals access to a service or website that requires an indication of assent to contractual terms before access to the service or website will be granted was sufficient evidence that the user clicked i accept  holding public service corporation obligated to furnish service to each patron at same price charged to other patrons for substantially similar service