the Supreme Court has held that the Eleventh Amendment embodies a “broader concept of immunity” that also protects states from suits by its own citizens. Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe, — U.S. -,-, 117 S.Ct. 2028, 2033, 138 L.Ed.2d 438 (1997) (citing Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 10 S.Ct. 504, 33 L.Ed. 842 (1890)). Eleventh Amendment immunity extends to suits against state officials acting in their official capacities. Thomas v. Gunter, 32 F.3d 1258, 1261 (8th Cir.1994). However, in Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S ing violation of federal law where the requested relief is prospective is ordinarily sufficient to invoke the Young fiction.” Coeur dAlene Tribe, — U.S. at -, 117 S.Ct. at 2040; see, e.g., Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 288-90, 97 S.Ct. 2749, 2761-62, 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977) (<HOLDING>); Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians v.
recognizing doctrine holding that  1983 applies to violations of any federal statute not just equal rights legislation recognizing cause of action against federal officials for violation of constitutional rights holding that a federal civil rights claim must be prosecuted under the same procedure applicable to a state civilrights claim holding the young doctrine applicable where plaintiff merely sought an injunction against ongoing violations of federal civil rights