records would show on their face that his sentence was adversely affected by the application of the 1995 guidelines because the sentence imposed could not have been imposed under the 1994 guidelines without a departure. See, e.g., Davis v. State, 765 So.2d 258 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s order
holding that motion raising heggs claim was insufficient because it failed to allege sentence imposed could not have been imposed under 1994 guidelines recognizing that a criminal prosecution is not complete until a sentence has been imposed holding that defendant should be resentenced where district court imposed a sentence under an erroneously calculated guidelines range  even where the sentence imposed fell within the correct range holding statutory booker error was not harmless where district court imposed sentence in middle of guidelines range and there were no statements in the record reflecting that the court would have imposed the same or greater sentence under advisory guidelines holding that defendant entitled to resentencing if the sentence imposed under the unconstitutional 1995 sentencing guidelines would constitute an impermissible departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines