Lucia Gisela Zarazua de Rojas, her husband, Benito Rojas-Galvan, and their four children, Hector Gareth Rojas Zarazua, Sharito Gisela Rojas Zarazua, Lizet Briseiry Rojas Zarazua, and Josué Benito Rojas Zarazua (“Petitioners”), natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of their application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Petitioners’ contention that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate their right to due process is foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). The Clerk is directed to stay the mandate
holding that imposition of more severe sentence following trial de novo does violate defendants due process rights holding that negligent inaction by a jail officer does not violate due process holding that doctrine does not violate due process holding that the defendant bears the burden of proof and that such a disposition does not violate the due process clause holding that the bias streamlining procedure does not violate an aliens due process rights