No. 15-2 at 9; see also Doc. No. 10 at 26.) In Feres v. United States, the Supreme Court of the United States held that the government is “not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.” 340 U.S. 135, 146, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950). The Feres Doctrine applies to state law intentional torts. See John v. Sec’y of Army, 484 Fed.Appx. 661, 663 (3d Cir.2012) (“the rationale for precluding [FTCA] suits [against the federal government] applies equally to suits brought directly under state law” because “[s]uits founded on state law havé the same potential for undermining military discipline as federal tort claims”); Jaffee v. United States, 663 F.2d 1226, 1239 (3d Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). “Feres should be intérpreted to “bar all
holding in an employees action to recover for injury sustained during work against the employer and other defendants did not state an intentional tort claim against contractor holding that plaintiffs failure to allege compliance with these statutes did not bar his claim against members of county board of supervisors as individuals for illegal expenditures of public funds holding thatthe feres doctrine extends to bar a federal service members state law intentional tort claim against army supervisors holding that a ttca claim based on an officers allegedly negligent use of his service weapon was a claim for intentional tort not negligence holding that the feres doctrine bars a military prisoners claims for monetary damages