remains in the dark about the affairs of the corporation and the actions of its directors and officers. The type of information withheld varies with the squeeze techniques being employed, but most commonly concerns the value of the enterprise and of an interest in it, the corporation’s prospects for profitable operations in the future, the controlling shareholders’ plans for the business, and any plans they may have for disposing of their interests in it. Since the public reporting and disclosure requirements of the federal securities law do not apply to close corporations, shareholders in a close corporation do not have access to sources of information available to securities holders in a public-issue corporation.” O’Neal, 35 Clev. St. L. Rev. at 130. See also, Leech, 762 A.2d at 720 (<HOLDING>); Miller, Note, 12 J.L. & Com. at 81 (arguing
holding that in certain situations it is oppressive for majority shareholders to parse out the information or documents that the duly elected and constituted secretarytreasurer has access to recognizing common law right of access to judicial documents holding that the right of access to government information or sources of information within the governments control is not mandated by the first or fourteenth amendments holding actual possession of or access to information by the irs is not an absolute bar to enforcement of a summons for that information holding that the press has standing to intervene where not otherwise a party to petition for access to court documents and records