Plaintiff drove his truck over the interstate, endangering not only himself but many others in the process. Plaintiff admitted “waking up” while proceeding down the freeway, not knowing where he was or where the time went. In his deposition, Plaintiff admitted that it was possible that he could run over someone with his truck and not notice it. Indeed, by his own admission, Plaintiffs driving in such condition created “a possibility of extreme danger.” (Plaintiffs Depo., at 108). Although someone with Plaintiffs condition can likely do a plethora of other tasks, driving a gasoline truck weighing several tons loaded with flammable liquid is certainly not one of them. Plaintiff is not qualified for the position of gas delivery driver as a matter of law. See Daugherty, 56 F.3d at 698 (<HOLDING>); accord Chiari v. City of League City, 920
holding that under the first amendment speech can be pursuant to a public employees official job duties even though it is not required by or included in the employees job description or in response to a request by the employer holding that plaintiff could not show that he was disabled because he conceded that he could do his job despite his impairment holding prison official is deliberately indifferent if he knew that prisoner faced a substantial risk of harm and disregarded that risk holding that because plaintiff did not apply for a job he could not be rejected in a title vii case holding that an individual is not qualified for a job if there is a genuine substantial risk that he could be injured or could injure others and the employer cannot modify the job to eliminate that risk