a party to the divorce action, and no evidence was presented to suggest that he had consented to the transfer of any of the husband’s interest in KRIP. Section 10A-5A-1.09(a), Ala.Code 1975, which became effective on January 1, 2015, provides that “[a] limited liability company is bound by and may enforce the limited liability company agreement.” We note that there is no binding Alabama precedent regarding whether a trial court is bound by such an agreement in making an equitable division of property in a divorce; however, in Equitable Division of Property, Brett R. Turner points out that the general rule appears to be that a court is so bound. 3 Brett R. Turner, Equitable Division of Property § 9:6 (3d ed.2015); see also Schiller v. Schiller, 625 So.2d 856, 858 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1993) (<HOLDING>); Kelsey v. Kelsey, 714 N.E.2d 187, 192
holding that a claim for breach of a partnership agreement because it is based on conduct that occurred after the issuance and sale of the partnership units does not arise from the purchase or sale of those units holding that absent an agreement to the contrary any partner can act as an agent of the partnership when apparently carrying on in the usual way the business of the partnership  holding that a partnership agreement that contained prohibitions against the sale or assignment of a partners interest in the partnership without the others consent would be enforced holding that a partner who is without actual authority has no power to bind the partnership in a transaction that is not within the ordinary and apparent scope of the partnership business any person dealing with a partner can only rely on the partners acts if they are within the ordinary and apparent scope of the partnership business recognizing that in a divorce action one partys limited partnership interest could not be assigned to the other party without the consent of the general partner