date of the model rule, and August 1, 1983, the effective date of the new bankruptcy rules, see White Motor Corp. v. Citibank, N.A., 704 F.2d 254 (6th Cir.1983), we hold today that subsequent to August 1, 1983, any local rule governing procedure, as distinguished from jurisdiction, in bankruptcy cases must yield to the bankruptcy rules duly promulgated under the Supreme Court’s statutory authority. 28 U.S.C. § 2075. Therefore, to the extent that the model rule and the new bankruptcy rules provide for differing standards of appellate review, the latter must prevail. IY. The judgment of the district court will be vacated and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with the foregoing. 1 . But cf. Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd., 709 F.2d 190, 199-200 (3d Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). 2 . Section 636(c)(1) provides: (c)
holding that court of appeals statutory jurisdiction over final orders of removal extends to reinstatement orders holding that orders remanding an action to a federal agency are generally not considered final appealable orders holding that remand orders are also appealable orders under 28 usc  1291 holding that appeals from district court orders entered prior to the effective date of northern pipeline construction co v marathon pipe line co 458 us 50 102 sct 2858 73 led2d 598 1982 reviewing interlocutory orders from bankruptcy courts are appealable inter alia under  1291 rather than  1293 holding that orders overruling claims of privilege and requiring disclosure are immediately appealable as collateral orders