if a voter’s registration is a “mechanical adjunct” then a candidate’s act of registration is also a “mechanical adjunct.” Mr. Campbell relies upon Dillon v. Fiorina, 340 F.Supp. 729 (D.N.M.1972) (per curiam) to counter the State’s argument. In Dillon, the district court struck down a New Mexico statute that prevented any person from becoming a candidate for United States Senator “unless he ha[d] been affiliated with that party for at least one year prior to the filing date for the primary election.” Id. at 730. The court determined that, because the statute in effect required residency for two years within New Mexico, it added an “impermissible requirement” to the qualifications for candidacy. Id. at 731; see also State ex rel. Chavez v. Evans, 79 N.M. 578, 446 P.2d 445, 448 (1968) (<HOLDING>); Hellmann v. Collier, 217 Md. 93, 141 A.2d
holding that provision requiring candidate to be a resident and qualified elector unconstitutionally adds additional qualifications holding that candidate for state medical board voluntarily placed herself in position of public attention given strong public interest in board appointees qualifications holding factor b is not unconstitutionally vague holding that ny elec l  2126 unconstitutionally burdens  first amendment rights as applied to a party supporting a crossendorsed candidate running in another partys primary holding candidate for house of representatives had standing to challenge election regulation exempting opponents of selffinancing candidates from certain campaigncontribution limits where plaintiff candidate had declared his candidacy and was demonstrably a selffinancing candidate whose opponents would imminently receive expanded access to campaign funding