the record indicates that these were projected costs with no indication when or if Vicky had actually incurred these costs. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 . Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51, 128 S.Ct. 586, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). 2 . Id.; United States v. Delgado-Martinez, 564 F.3d 750, 753 (5th Cir.2009). 3 . 18 U.S.C. § 3553(c). 4 . Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 356, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). 5 . United States v. Mondragon-Santiago, 564 F.3d 357, 363-64 (5th Cir.2009). 6 . Rita, 551 U.S. at 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456; see also United States v. Gomez-Herrera, 523 F.3d 554, 565 (5th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Rodriguez, 523 F.3d 519,
holding that explanation that sentencing judge was persuaded by the arguments at the hearing and in the sentencing memos that he should not depart downward from the guidelines range was sufficient holding that a district court must notify the parties that it intends to upwardly depart from the sentencing range established by the sentencing guidelines holding apprendi is not implicated by an application of the sentencing guidelines that increases the sentencing range so long as the sentence imposed does not exceed the statutory maximum holding that despite the advisory nature of the sentencing guidelines they remain the starting point and the initial benchmark of a district courts sentencing analysis the district court should begin all sentencing proceedings by correctly calculating the applicable guidelines range and keep that range in mind throughout the sentencing process and that failing to calculate or improperly calculating the guidelines range  or failing to adequately explain the chosen sentenceemdashincluding an explanation for any deviation from the guidelines range constitutes significant procedural error  holding that a court may depart downward from the applicable guideline range under section 4a13