The plain language of the statute refers only to “Presidential proclamations and Executive orders” of general applicability, “documents or classes of documents that the President may determine ... have general applicability and legal effect,” and “documents or classes of documents that may be required so to be published by Act of Congress.” § 1505(a). Title 21 does not fall into any of these categories. The language Walls emphasizes, “every document or order which prescribes a penalty,” simply modifies the previously outlined categories; it does not itself create a new category of documents subjection to the statute. Thus, a basic criminal statute passed by Congress, such as Title 21, is not covered by 44 U.S.C. § 1505(a). See United States v. Schiefen, 139 F.3d 638, 639 (8th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>) (citing 44 U.S.C. § 1505(a) and 5 U.S.C. §§
holding civil factual sufficiency preservation requirements do not apply in criminal context holding that the notice requirements of section 101101 do not apply to employees because they are not governmental units recognizing that the federal rules of evidence do not apply to sentencing hearings holding that the federal register notice requirements do not apply to federal criminal statutes holding that a transferee federal court should apply its interpretations of federal law not the constructions of federal law of the transferor circuit