Oatts’s conviction for child molesting as a class C felony. Affirmed. ROBB, J. and CRONE, J. concur. 1 . Ind.Code § 35-42-4-3 (2004) (subsequently amended by Pub.L. No. 216-2007, § 42 (eff. July 1, 2007)). 2 . A.S. thought the videotape was a children’s movie and played a "little bit” of the video before A.S.’s mother discovered A.S. watching it and told her to turn it off. Transcript at 20. 3 . The record does not provide a last name for Tony. The record is also unclear as to the circumstances surrounding any encounter between Tony and A.S. 4 . The record does not contain the actual answer given to the jury. 5 . Ind. Evidence Rule 412(a) governs the admissibility of evidence of past sexual conduct and provides: In a prosecution for a sex crime, evidence 822, 826 (Ind.Ct.App.2000) (<HOLDING>); with Sallee v. State, 111 N.E.2d 1204, 1210
holding that the defendants failure to comply with ind evidence rule 412b precluded her from presenting evidence of the victims past sexual history and resulted in waiver of the issue on appeal holding under the prior appellate rule that the defendant waived the issue by failure to comply with ind appellate rule 83a7 which required a verbatim copy of the refused instruction and the verbatim objections thereto if any in the argument section of the brief holding that failure to comply with the hozada requirements is not fatal where the alleged ineffective assistance is plain on the face of the administrative record holding that trial court erred by not allowing the plaintiff to introduce evidence of prior dealings with the defendant holding that the defendants failure to comply with the procedural mandate of ind evidence rule 412b was fatal to his attempt to introduce evidence of prior false rape allegations