see also Shepard, 544 U.S. at 26, 125 S.Ct. 1254 (explaining that among other things, a court may look to a “transcript of colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant”). Nonetheless, Lewis’s statements at sentencing do not establish to a legal certainty under which portion of the Louisiana manslaughter statute Lewis was convicted. These statements do not describe how the offense was committed. Nor do they indicate that the offense was committed intentionally. Accordingly, we agree with Lewis that the statements he made at sentencing are compatible with the scenario that Lewis committed manslaughter during the criminally negligent discharge of a firearm. See State of Louisiana v. Brown, 513 So.2d 425, 428 (La.Ct.App.1987) (<HOLDING>). Because we cannot identify with legal
holding that illegal use of a weapon is one of the predicate offenses for manslaughter where there is no intent to cause death or great bodily harm holding offense of carjacking while armed with a deadly weapon may be committed by holding the open blade of a pocket knife to the victims throat whether an object is a deadly weapon  ie whether it is likely to produce death or great bodily harm  is a factual question to be answered by the jury in each case holding where there was no testimony that the victim required medical treatment for her burns or that she had any lasting ill effects or scars  there was insufficient testimony as a matter of law to support a charge of aggravated battery for causing great bodily harm holding it error to give selfdefense instruction requiring that defendant believe his actions were necessary to avert death or great bodily harm when defendant claimed that the victims death was accidental holding section 107a17bs plain language does not require that the actor actually intend death or serious bodily injury an object is a deadly weapon if the actor intends a use of the object in which it would be capable of causing death or serious bodily injury