orders or expedited and inexpensive adjudication of smaller claims in a number of contexts. In the analogous context of unemployment proceedings, this court in Salida recognized that: If findings entered at an unemployment compensation hearing may be used to establish the employer's liability for unlawful discharge in a subsequent lawsuit, the employer would have a strong incentive to use its superior resources consistently to oppose a discharged employee's claim for unemployment benefits. Issues presented to the Division will be contested strongly, and the hearings will become lengthy and more detailed, and will no longer be suited to the prompt resolution of unemployment compensation claims. Salida, 732 P.2d at 1165; see also Williamsen v. People, 735 P.2d 176, 182 (Colo.1987) (<HOLDING>). These considerations apply equally to the
holding that res judicata and collateral estoppel apply to arbitration award recognizing the doctrine of collateral estoppel in agency proceedings holding that collateral estoppel applies to  1983 claims recognizing that compelling reasons may exist not to apply collateral estoppel where proceedings are tailored to promote prompt inexpensive adjudication of smaller claims holding doctrine of collateral estoppel may apply to unconfirmed arbitration award