290 B.R. at 843. 14 . K.S.A. § 84-9-311(a)(2). 15 . K.S.A. § 58-4204(c)-(d). 16 . In re Hicks, 491 F.3d at 1140. 17 . See K.S.A. § 84-9-311, cmt. 5 (noting that this gap might otherwise "result in turning some objectionable transactions into avoidable preferences under Bankruptcy Code Section 547”); Mid Amer. Credit Union v. Bd. of County Comm'rs, 15 Kan.App.2d 216, 223, 806 P.2d 479 (Kan.Ct.App.1991) (stating that the Kansas legislature created the NOSI procedure "to cover the period between the sale and the purchaser’s obtaining a certificate of title”); Lentz v. Bank of Independence (Matter of Kerr), 598 F.2d 1206, 1208 (10th Cir.1975) (same). 18 . K.S.A. § 58-4204(g). 19 . K.S.A. § 58-4203(a). 20 . Redmond v. MHC Fin. Serv. (In re Barker), 358 B.R. 399, 411-12 (Bankr.D.Kan.2007) (<HOLDING>); Morris v. Intrust Bank (In re Anderson), 351
holding that kansas law provides that perfection of a purchase money lien in a motor vehicle absent the filing of an nosi occurs when the electronic title and notation of the lenders lien thereon issues holding that under minnesota law refinancing and consolidation of purchase money loans did not destroy their purchase money character for bankruptcy lien avoidance purposes recognizing that in 1982 kentucky converted to a new title system for motor vehicles under which the secured creditor must perfect its security interest by noting the lien on the certificate of title to the motor vehicle recognizing kentucky as a state where actual notation of the secured partys lien on the certificate of title is a prerequisite for perfection of a security interest in a motor vehicle holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond