imprisonment and fine. That the minimum possible sentence is .... imprisonment in jail or by a fine in the amount of .... dollars or by both such confinement and fine; (4) That the defendant is aware that any recommendations by a prosecuting attorney or other prosecuting official are not binding on the judge and that any such recommendations may or may not be accepted by judge; (5) That if defendant pleads guilty or is found guilty of the charge, the judge is most likely to impose a sentence of confinement; (6) That, if indigent, and unable to employ an attorney, the defendant has a right to request the judge to appoint counsel to assist the defendant in his defense against the charge. The § 600.051 requirement is strictly enforced. See Peterson v. State, 572 S.W.2d 475 (Mo. banc 1978) (<HOLDING>). Subsequently, there have been several
holding that  172545hs written notice requirement is mandatory holding that the erroneous use of the term burglary in the beginning of the written jury instructions was not fundamental because any error was cured by the correct use of the term theft in the latter portion of the written instructions holding that the use of the written form is mandatory and that failure to use the written form as mandated is reversible error recognizing that deference to an agencys interpretation of the written law is appropriate only when that interpretation is within the written laws language holding that the district courts failure to enter a written statement of reasons as required by  3553c2 is not reversible error