proceeding, the bankruptcy trustee of Teleservices brought an adversary proceeding against Huntington to recover fraudulent transfers it received from Teleservices into Cyber-co’s accounts. Meoli v. Huntington Nat’l Bank (In re Teleservices), 444 B.R. 767 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.2011). The bankruptcy court, following a 12-day trial to decide on Huntington’s asserted “good faith” defense, concluded that Huntington “did not accept in good faith” the checks it received directly from Teleservices. Id. at 830. Based upon this finding, El Camino moved the district court to reconsider its summary judgment for Huntington, but the motion was denied. II. We review a grant of summary judgment de App. 38, 475 N.W.2d 405, 408 (1991), rev’d in part on other grounds by 442 Mich. 136, 500 N.W.2d 115 (1993) (<HOLDING>); Trail Clinic, P.C. v. Bloch, 114 Mich.App.
recognizing aiding and abetting trespass holding there was no error in giving an instruction on aiding and abetting when defendant was not charged with aiding and abetting because ajiders and abettors  are chargeable directly as principals holding it was not a surprise or unfair to the defendant for the state to pursue a theory of aiding and abetting at trial when the charging document did not refer to aiding and abetting recognizing both aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duties and aiding and abetting conversion recognizing aiding and abetting conversion