all of them; more specifically, it precludes the New Children’s claims in the instant action. Notwithstanding Plaintiffs’ implicit proposition to the contrary, the substantive legal relationship inquiry turns on the relationship between the parties and not on the alignment of the types of damages available under the theories of recovery asserted in each proceeding. 32 . As pointed out by the district court, the Mothers’ (and the Original Children’s) inter ests in litigating this issue were perfectly aligned with the New Children’s interests. 33 . Defendants also have requested affirmance of the district court's ruling on the TVPA claims against Drummond Company, Inc. and Drummond Ltd. based on Mohamad v. Palestinian Authority, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1702, 1708-11, 182 L.Ed.2d 720 (2012) (<HOLDING>). Defendants correctly cite Mohamad for this
holding that although the ngpa authorizes certain price ceilings for natural gas it is the gas sales contract not federal law that creates the right to receive any price at all holding that the tvpa authorizes liability solely against natural persons holding issues of fact in dispute are solely for the jury holding that the secretary may only delegate the powers and duties of the office to a natural person not to an administration or entity other than a natural person holding the foster parents responsible for support where the childs natural parents are unknown and noting that an earlier new york case held that an agreement to adopt did not terminate the natural parents duty of support but that in that earlier case the natural parent was alive and capable of providing for the child