375 F.2d 135, 143-44 (5th Cir.1967) (footnotes and citations omitted). 30 . The diagnoses included "chronic paranoid schizophrenic” (Dr. Kenneth Ritter); “atypical psychosis ... delusional disorder” (Dr. Raphael Salcedo); "psychosis not otherwise specified” with "prominent symptoms of paranoia and persecution” (Dr. Jose Pena); "delusional disorder, persecutory type” (Dr. Guillermo Urrutia); "psychotic disorder similar to schizophrenia” (Dr. Sarah Deland); and "delusional disorder, persecutory type, severe” (Dr. Carlos Kronberger). 31 . Dr. Ritter, Dr. Salcedo, and Dr. Deland were all appointed by the court to the sanity commission. Dr. Carrington was employed by the state as a staff member at FFF. Dr. Pena examined Perez at the request of the FFF staff. 32 . See Brock, 387 F.2d at 258 (<HOLDING>). 33 . Perez, 745 So.2d at 184. 34 . Id. 35 .
holding that a witnesss testimony or an exhibit may not explicitly and directly contain an opinion as to a trial witnesss credibility holding that witnesss opinion of a persons reaction to hearing a statement was admissible lay testimony based on personal observation holding that lay opinion testimony is not admissible when the jury can readily draw the necessary inferences and conclusions without the aid of the opinion holding that single lay witnesss testimony was insufficient to rebut the opinion of a skilled and disinterested government psychiatrist which opinion is in no way impugned or discredited holding that lay witness opinion as to guilt of defendant inadmissible