with the other applicable provisions of this title.” § 1325(a)(1). IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW A. Jurisdiction & Venue This Court holds jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1334, which provides “the district courts shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all cases under title 11.” Section 157 allows a district court to “refer” all bankruptcy and related cases to the bankruptcy court, wherein the latter court will appropriately preside over the matter. 28 U.S.C. § 157(a); see also In re: Order of Reference to Bankruptcy Judges, Gen. Order 2012-6 (S.D. Tex. May 24, 2012). In the instant case, the Court is considering whether the Debtors’ Sixth Amended Plan is confirmable under the s a core matter, this Court acknowledges the issues Stem presents. 564 U.S. at 473-74, 131 S.Ct. 2594 (<HOLDING>). An order denying confirmation of a proposed
holding that the bankruptcy court has constitutional and implied statutory authority to conduct jury trials in core proceedings holding that bankruptcy judges may hear and enter final judgments in core proceedings holding bankruptcy courts cannot enter final judgment on fraudulent transfer claims holding that bankruptcy court may issue proposed findings and conclusions in a core proceeding over which the bankruptcy court does not have constitutional authority holding that after stem bankruptcy judges have the authority to enter interlocutory orders in noncore proceedings and in core proceedings as to which the bankruptcy court may not enter final orders or judgment consistent with article iii absent consent