to Defendants and Injunctive Relief Will Serve the Public Interest Plaintiffs’ need to protect their proprietary computer source code under the circumstances of this ease outweighs the burden on Defendants in delaying further development and use of the portions of their system pending a determination of whether the VIMAS source code or its derivative has been incorporated into SAF-YER. “[A] party cannot use another’s trade secrets so long as their product is substantially derived from the trade secrets.” Specialty Chem. & Servs., 1988 WL 618583, at *5. The balance of hardships, thus weighs in Plaintiffs’ favor. Equity demands that Defendants be prevented from using a program derived from the source code taken from Plaintiffs. Id.; see also Amedisys Holding, LLC, 793 F.Supp.2d at 1314 (<HOLDING>). If Defendants were allowed to unfairly
holding that defendant need not establish that he was not engaged in unlawful activity under section 776012 holding that an aggrieved party is not required to prove that his property would in fact suffer the requisite degree of harm before he can seek judicial assistance holding that defendant cannot suffer compensable harm when enjoined from an unlawful activity recognizing that violation of privacy right even without objective harm is still compensable holding that likelihood of irreparable harm must be based on evidence in the record not unsupported and conclusory statements regarding harm the plaintiff might suffer