it very clear that the exclusionary rule should apply (i.e. the good faith exception should not apply) if the exclusion of evidence would alter the behavior of individual law enforcement officers or the policies of their department.” United States v. Vasey, 834 F.2d 782, 789 (9th Cir.1987). This rule was reaffirmed two years later. United States v. Wanless, 882 F.2d 1459, 1466 (9th Cir.1989) (“The mere fact that the officer requesting the warrant is truthful about the evidence he submits in support of the warrant is insufficient. We have recently decided that the good faith exception does not apply where a search warrant is issued on the basis of evidence obtained as the result of an illegal search.”) (citation omitted). See also United States v. Reed, 15 F.3d 928, 933 (9th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>) (citing Vasey). The Eighth Circuit reached a
holding that observations made a during prior illegal search should not have been included in the affidavit for the search warrant holding that a search warrant is invalid if not based on an affidavit holding that because evidence supporting search warrant was illegally obtained evidence recovered by executing warrant was fruit of the illegal search holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant