of the child had been decided, whether by the court in Louisiana or by the Montgomery Circuit Court, the issue of the child’s custody was not “otherwise before the court” pursuant to former § 12-15-30(b)(l), Ala.Code 1975. As a result, the jurisdiction of the juvenile court was never invoked in case no. JU-07-27.01, and the juvenile court lacked the power to adjudicate the issues of custody, child support, and visitation. See M.S. v. D.A.P., 1 So.3d 73, 74 (Ala.Civ.App.2008) (Bryan, J., dissenting). Therefore, all judgments and orders entered by the juvenile court in case no. JU-07-27.01 are void. Because the judgment entered in JU-07-27.01 is void, the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to modify or enforce that judgment. Cf. McCarthy v. McCarthy, 785 So.2d 1138 (Ala.Civ.App.2000) (<HOLDING>)^ In its October 21, 2009, judgment, the
recognizing that only void judgments are subject to collateral attack and that a judgment is void only when court had no jurisdiction of the parties or property no jurisdiction of the subject matter no jurisdiction to enter the particular judgment or no capacity to act holding that judgment of contempt was void because it punished relator for violating order that trial court lacked authority to enter holding that when the district court improperly purported to transfer to the circuit court an action over which the circuit court lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter its judgment which was void and dismissing the appeal from that void judgment holding provision in contempt order void because it punished relator for violating order that trial court lacked authority to enter holding that circuit court that had no jurisdiction to modify georgia custody determination could not enter valid contempt judgment against husband for violating void modification judgment