Law & PRACTICE § 67.4 (2d ed.2002); Matter of Atlas Supply Corp., 857 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir.1988); In re Solomon, 277 B.R. 706, 707 (Bankr.E.D.Tex.2002). In fact, the Bankruptcy Code also speaks as to the scope of the word “including” used in § 707(a). Section 102 of the Bankruptcy Code states that the words “includes” and “including” are not limiting. 11 U.S.C. § 102(3). Bad Faith Filing as Cause for Dismissal Several courts have held that a lack of good faith is cause for dismissal. In re Tamecki 229 F.3d 205 (3rd Cir.2000); In re Zick, 931 F.2d 1124 (6th Cir.1991); In re Miller, 263 B.R. 183 (N.D.N.Y.2001). However, the issue is not settled because numerous courts have held to the contrary. In re Padilla, 222 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir.2000); In re Huckfeldt, 39 F.3d 829 (8th Cir.1994)(<HOLDING>); In re Etcheverry, 242 B.R. 503, 506
holding that although courts have inherent power to dismiss bad faith litigant  707a does not provide basis for dismissal on grounds of bad faith filing holding title company liable for bad faith holding that the list contained in 11usc  707a is not exhaustive such that bad faith may constitute cause for dismissal in a chapter 7 bankruptcy holding that lack of good faith is a valid basis to dismiss a chapter 7 case for cause under section 707a holding that a bad faith claim is a tort