v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 143, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995), the Supreme Court held that the term “use” is to be construed narrowly and its application limited to the “active employment” of a firearm. “Active employment” includes “brandishing, displaying, bartering, striking with, and, most obviously, firing or attempting to fire a firearm.” Id. at 148, 116 S.Ct. 501. The term “carry,” however, as used by the statute is construed broadly and retains its ordinary meaning. Muscarello v. United States, 524 U.S. 125, 131, 118 S.Ct. 1911, 141 L.Ed.2d 111 (1998). A defendant carries a firearm when he conveys or moves the firearm, including via a vehicle, and when there is “personal agency and some degree of possession” over the firearm. Id. at 137, 118 S.Ct. 1911; see id. (<HOLDING>). As the Supreme Court has noted, “a firearm
holding that guns located in trunk of car were carried under statute holding the phrase carries a firearm is not limited to the carrying of firearms on the person but also applies to a person who knowingly possesses firearms in a vehicle including in the locked glove compartment or trunk of a car holding that the term carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding that although search of passenger compartment was legal search of trunk was not holding recovery of stolen guns from trunk of accuseds car was insufficient corroboration of testimony of accomplice who lived with accused and used his car