of review in Kentucky courts in Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Serv. Ctr., Inc., 807 S.W.2d 476, 483 (Ky.1991)). 3 . Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure (CR) Rule 56.03. 4 . Patterson v. Blair, 172 S.W.3d 361, 364 (Ky.2005) (undertaking historical review of rationale for respondeat superior liability, considering economic structure and analysis); Osborne v. Payne, 31 S.W.3d 911, 915 (Ky.2000). 5 . Patterson, 172 S.W.3d at 366. 6 . Id. at 369 (reviewing and synthesizing Wood v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines, 302 Ky. 110, 194 S.W.2d 81, 82 (1946); Frederick v. Collins, 378 S.W.2d 617, 619 (Ky.1964); and Osborne, 31 S.W.3d at 915). 7 . Wood, 194 S.W.2d at 83. 8 . Id. at 83-84. 9 . Frederick, 106, 682 N.W.2d 328, 338 (2004) (formulating a test to determine franchisor vicarious 2d 359 (1935) (<HOLDING>). These cases correctly concluded that an
holding a racetrack vicariously hable when its security guard assaulted the plaintiff with a club holding employer may be hable for sexual harassment of employee by independent contractor holding that employer is not vicariously hable for employees negligence while driving to work where such driving conferred no special benefit upon employer other than to make employees services available holding a store vicariously hable when its assistant manager falsely imprisoned the plaintiff holding school district strictly hable for sexual harassment by its employees