I, Section 1, of the Pennsylvania Constitution, the requirements of which are not distinguishable from the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution, see Pennsylvania Game Comm’n v. Marich, 542 Pa. 226, 229 n. 6, 666 A.2d 253, 255 n. 6 (1995), a local agency employee has a personal or property right in his employment when he can establish a legitimate expectation of continued employment through either contract or statute. See Short v. Borough of Lawrenceville, 548 Pa. 265, 267, 696 A.2d 1158, 1159 (1997) (per curiam). Parenthetically, it is arguable whether a public official's due process interest extends beyond the economic benefits of the position. See generally Harris v. Board of Educ. of the City of Atlanta, 105 F.3d 591, 596-97 (11th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 13 . Indeed, Appellant framed his mandamus
holding right to testify was federal constitutional right holding criminal defendant does not have constitutional right to have guilty plea accepted by court holding that a school superintendent does not have a constitutional right to actually hold his position and execute the duties of the office recognizing the right to trial by jury is a constitutional right to be given the same protections as other constitutional rights holding that constitutional right of privacy does not apply to medical records