(Doc. # 3214), p. 46. I do not agree with the Equity Committee’s position regarding compliance with state law, including the Delaware General Corporation Law. Section 1123(a) unequivocally states that the provisions which a plan shall contain is “[njotwithstanding any otherwise applicable non-bankruptcy law.” The quoted language clearly means, and case law so holds, that the provisions of a plan as articulated in § 1123(a) can be effected without regard to otherwise applicable nonbankruptcy law, including the corporation law of the State of Delaware or any other state corporation laws having bearing on the debtors. 7 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 1123.LH[4], p. 1123-27 (15th ed. rev.2002). See e.g. Universal Cooperatives, Inc. v. FCX, Inc. (In re FCX, Inc.), 853 F.2d 1149, 1154 (4th Cir.1988)(<HOLDING>); In re Pacific Gas & Electric Co., 283 B.R.
holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning holding that in construing statute courts must first look to its plain language holding  1123a5d overrides nonbankruptcy law by its plain language holding that when the contract language is unambiguous we take these words to represent the parties intent and the plain meaning of this language governs its interpretation holding plain language compelled that reading