that our legislature has deemed criminal contempt to be a petty offense, as it is punishable by only ten days in jail and a $50 fine. See Tenn.Code Ann. § 29-9-103 (2000). Moreover, the criminal contempt charges involved in the instant case all relate to the defendant’s violations of an order of protection, whereas in Codispoti, the charges all pertained to direct insults or threats to the court Our reading of Codispoti and Lewis convinces us that the latter conduct in Codispoti is what distinguishes that case from Lewis and the facts of the instant case. Accordingly, following Lewis, we hold that the defendant in the instant case was not entitled to a jury trial. See also Perkerson v. Perkerson, No. 01A01-9602-CV-00059, 1996 WL 426807, at *3 (Tenn.Ct.App. M.S., filed July 31, 1996) (<HOLDING>). D. Finally, the defendant asserts that the
holding that a fiftytwo million dollar fine could not be imposed as a sanction for criminal contempt except through a jury trial holding that the failure to impose a mandatory fine requires that the matter be remanded for imposition of that fine holding that when a fine is paid there is a full satisfaction of one of the alternative penalties of the law and that the fine cannot be reimbursed in order to punish the defendant instead with imprisonment holding that a state cannot imposte a fine as a sentence and then automatically convert it into a jail term solely because the defendant is indigent and cannot forthwith pay the fine in full holding that the violation of a court order punishable by a fifty dollar fine andor ten days in jail under tenncode ann  299103 does not entitle the accused to a jury trial