car in which contraband is found is insufficient to' support a conviction. In Miller, the defendant was arrested based on an informant’s tip at a time when he was walking toward a car with keys in his hand. Id. at 236-37. Here, Wiley was not merely in possession of car keys. He was apprehended in an area known for narcotics activity, on suspicion of tampering with evidence, with a wad of cash and car keys in his pocket, half a block away from his car in which officers found cocaine, crack cocaine, and paperwork bearing Wiley’s name in plain view. The other authorities upon which Wiley relies are similarly distinguishable because in each case the links between the defendant and the contraband were significantly weaker. See, e.g., Waldon v. State, 579 S.W.2d 499, 502 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (<HOLDING>); Roberson v. State, 80 S.W.3d 730, 734-36
holding evidence that marijuana was found in jointly occupied vehicle in open view was insufficient to establish defendants dominion and control by preponderance of evidence holding that the state failed to prove that a hotel visitor had control over marijuana found in plain view in a hotel room because the state did not provide any evidence other than the defendants mere proximity to the marijuana holding evidence insufficient to connect defendant to marijuana found in camper near private airplane hangar when he was found in hangar in possession of key to airplane but no evidence indicated he flew airplane that night or in any other way linked him to marijuana found in other vehicle holding that officers had objective probable cause to search the pocket of a jacket found on the seat of the defendants truck where the discovery of marijuana in two different locations in the truck combined with the defendants possession of marijuana reasonably led officers to believe that other caches would be found elsewhere in the vehicle holding evidence insufficient for conviction of possession of marijuana amphetamines and barbiturates when those drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other people on the premises