Opportunity for the D.C. Office of the Attorney General, to discuss his allegations. Id. ¶ 27. Ms. McDaniel also forwarded a copy of the complaint to Ms. Williams and Mr. Seales, to which Ms. Williams responded by attaching a copy of Mr. Black’s proposed discipline action. Id. ¶¶ 28-29. E. The Comprehensive Merit Protection Act The purpose of the Comprehensive Merit Protection Act (CMPA) is to ensure that the District has “a modern flexible system of public personnel administration, which shall ... [establish impartial and comprehensive administrative or negotiated procedures for resolving employee grievances. Washington v. District of Columbia, 538 F.Supp.2d 269, 275 (D.D.C.2008) (quoting D.C. Code §§ 1-601.2(a)(5)); see also Robinson v. Dist. of Columbia, 748 A.2d 409, 411 (D.C.2000) (<HOLDING>). “It is undisputed that the [CMPA] creates a
holding that with few exceptions the cmpa is the exclusive remedy for a district of columbia public employee who has a workrelated complaint of any kind holding a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy is not available where the employee has an existing statutory remedy recognizing that the cmpa provides the exclusive remedy for a common law action  if the employee claims wrongful treatment or injury cognizable as a personnel issue under the acts performance ratings adverse actions and employee grievance provisions holding that all employee actions against employers for workrelated injuries based on any degree of negligence are within exclusive coverage of workers compensation law and may not be maintained under common law holding that district court may order hearing as remedy for termination of public employee without due process