meeting at which Getch purportedly told those present that his conviction had been reversed. See Affidavit of Anthony Getch, August 15, 1988 [hereinafter Getch Affidavit] ¶ 6. 6 . Sherrer Certification II, supra, ¶ 4; Rafferty Affidavit, supra, ¶ 4. 7 . Defendant’s Memorandum of Law, Exhibit H. 8 . Sherrer Certification II, supra, ¶¶ 4-6. Since the events herein, Rahway prison officials have adopted the practice of contacting the inmate’s own attorney rather than the prosecutor in cases such as this. Id. ¶ 7. 9 . Id. ¶ 7. 10 . Defendant's Memorandum of Law, Exhibit I. 11 . Id. Exhibit J. 12 . Id. Exhibit K. 13 . Id. Exhibit L, 14 . Id. Exhibit M; Rafferty Affidavit, supra, ¶¶8-9. 15 . Getch Affidavit, supra, ¶¶ 9-10. 16 . Cf. Maddox v. Thomas, 671 F.2d 949, 950 (5th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). 17 . See supra note 2. 18 .Nevertheless, the
holding that defendant has due process right to introduce evidence on minimum parole eligibility in sentencing phase holding that a convict awaiting sentencing has no such right arising from the due process clause holding that the due process clause confers a right to direct a childs education holding that the defendant bears the burden of proof and that such a disposition does not violate the due process clause holding that there is no due process right to appellate review