of the estate at a public or private sale to pay the debts and the expenses of administration and to distribute the remaining proceeds to the heirs. Id. at 965. One of the properties was subject to a lease. By its terms, the lease granted the lessees “the first right option and privilege of purchasing said lands, and any sale must be made subject to the terms of the above described lease.” Id. The lease further provided that “the lessees were to have the right of first refusal ‘on such terms as first party (Rigby) shall then demand for the purchase price.’ ” Id. at 968. The administrator conducted a public sale of the property and a third party was the successful bidder. The lessees sought a declaration by the court that the sale triggered their right of f S.W.3d 346 (Tex. App.2004) (<HOLDING>); Pearson v. Schubach, 52 Wash. App. 716, 763
holding in a package deal case that a right of first refusal  empowers the rights holder with a preferential right to repurchase the property subject to the right of first refusal on the same terms offered by a bona fide purchaser holding right of first refusal only applied to a voluntary sale and taking of property by condemnation is involuntary therefore right of first refusal not triggered holding given language in agreement right of first refusal could not be exercised in context of a foreclosure sale holding united states marshals involuntary bankruptcy sale of property did not trigger right of first refusal holding transfer restriction granted right of first refusal in event of voluntary or involuntary transfer of stock