v. American Tobacco, Co., 2001 WL 290603, at *9 (N.D.Ill. March 20, 2001) (assumption of risk); In re Ford Motor Co. Ignition Switch, 194 F.R.D. 484, 490 (D.N.J.2000) (comparative and contributory negligence); Barnes v. American Tobacco Co., 161 F.3d 127, 149 (3d Cir.1998) (statute of limitations). 104 . In re Paxil, 212 F.R.D. at 548. 105 . Broussard, 155 F.3d at 342. 106 . Andrews v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., son v. American Tobacco Co., Inc., 189 F.R.D. 544, 557 (D.Minn.1999); In re St. Jude Medical, Inc. Silzone Heart Valves Products Liability Litigation, 2003 WL 1589527, at *14 (D.Minn. March 27, 2003); In re Baycol Products, 218 F.R.D. at 211. 118 . Barnes v. American Tobacco Co., 176 F.R.D. at 500. See also Santiago v. City of Philadelphia, 72 F.R.D. 619, 628 (D.C.Pa.1976) (<HOLDING>). 119 . In re Baycol, 218 F.R.D. at 211 (citing
holding that more than notice to a defendant is required holding that a court should be more hesitant in accepting ab2 suit which contains significant individual issues than it would under subsection 23b3 holding that the prison litigation reform act requires a prior showing of physical injury that need not be significant but must be more than de minimis  holding that it was plain error for trial court to allow more than one conviction of grossly negligent operation of a vehicle where more than one person was injured holding that to be admissible a prior inconsistent statement must have been uttered under highly reliable circumstances which would render inferences to be drawn from it more probable than not