CURIAM. Affirmed. See Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 456 (Fla.2003) (<HOLDING>). PALMER, ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ.,
holding that for defendants whose initial briefs were filed after the effective date of rule 3800b2 the failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3800b or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses them from raising the error on direct appeal holding in a similar context that filing a postconviction motion is a timely means of raising an alleged error by the circuit court during sentencing holding that to successfully challenge a departure sentence on appeal the state must properly preserve the issue by objection during the sentencing hearing holding that a sentencing error which had been held to be fundamental for defendants falling within the window period identified in maddox could not be raised for the first time on appeal by a defendant who had filed his initial appellate brief outside the window period identified in maddox without having previously raised his sentencing issue in the trial court either by objection or by postsentencing 3800b motion filed before or after the filing of his notice of appeal holding that general objection did not preserve error on appeal