“so egregious that it results in a denial of fundamental fairness.” Bugh v. Mitchell, 329 F.3d 496, 512 (6th Cir.2003). The magistrate judge correctly concluded that the admission of the mug shot was not fundamentally unfair and did not violate the Constitution. B. The petitioner objects to the conclusion that his Batson issue was procedurally defaulted. There is no dispute, however, that there was no objection at trial to the prosecutor’s use of peremptory challenges to remove African-Americans from the jury. Michigan procedural rules require challenges to the use of peremptory challenges under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), to be preserved by a contemporaneous objection. See People v. Williams, 174 Mich.App. 132, 137, 435 N.W.2d 469, 472 (1989) (<HOLDING>). A procedural default is “a critical failure
holding party must make timely and specific objection at trial to preserve issue for appellate review holding timely and sufficiently specific objection is required to preserve error holding a contemporaneous objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review holding that under state procedural law a timely objection is necessary to preserve a batson question for appellate review holding that in order to preserve an issue for review a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial