federal law occurred when the lawyer’s practice had been specifically authorized by a separate federal admissions authority. {¶ 10} For example, in Disciplinary Counsel v. Harris, 137 Ohio St.3d 1, 2013-Ohio-4026, 996 N.E.2d 921, ¶ 14-15, this court found that Harris did not engage in the unauthorized practice of law when he represented a client before the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio, because he had been admitted to practice in that court, even though he had not been admitted to the Ohio bar. In doing so, we acknowledged that “ ‘[a] bankruptcy court has the power to regulate the practice of law in the cases before it.’ ” Id. at ¶ 15, quoting In re Ferguson, 326 B.R. 419, 422 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 2005). See also In re Desilets, 291 F.3d 925 (6th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). Distinguishing Swendiman’s case from Harris
holding that an attorney licensed in texas and admitted to practice before a federal bankruptcy court in michigan was authorized to practice federal bankruptcy law in michigan even though he was not licensed in michigan because the bankruptcy courts rules permitted the attorney not only to appear before the bankruptcy court but also to counsel clients in bankruptcy actions or proceedings holding that the bankruptcy court has the inherent power to award sanctions for badfaith conduct in a bankruptcy court proceeding holding that the district court sitting in review of the decision of the bankruptcy court erred in concluding that plaintiffs failure to pay over taxes was willful because the bankruptcy court had made no findings on willfulness we remanded for bankruptcy court findings holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code