to cell phone technology, to interpret the records in question. More importantly, she performed this type of analysis frequently, often for use by law enforcement and 911 operators. Based on Danko’s education, training, and experience, the trial court admitted her expert testimony under Rule 702. Analysis In addressing the admissibility of scientific and nonseientific evidence, the trial judge determines whether the proffered witness is a qualified expert and whether the proffered testimony is reliable. Rule 702 does not provide a bright line test as to whether expert testimony is admissible. Tex.R. Evid. 702. The Dallas Court of Appeals recently addressed a similar review in Brown v. State, 163 S.W.3d 818, 824 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2005, pet. ref'd). In Brown, the appellan rim.App.1994) (<HOLDING>). In Gammill v. Jack Williams Chevrolet, Inc.,
holding that to state a claim for wage violations under the flsa plaintiffs must provide at least some approximation of the overtime hours that defendants required them to work and a time frame for when those hours were worked holding based on legislative history and statutory construction principles that the statute does not require that expert be in same field of practice only a field involving the same type of care or treatment holding that police officers have a duty to prevent crime and arrest offenders 24 hours a day and that a public duty is triggered any time an officer observes a crime even outside the hours of his official work holding that officers certification in hgn testing based on 40hour course consisting of 24 hours of classroom instruction and 16 additional hours of field evaluations qualified him as an expert holding that a plan administrators decision to deny benefits was arbitrary and capricious even though an attending physician had submitted a form stating the plaintiff could sit for six hours stand for two hours and walk for two hours