opinion that she was unqualified to make. Notably, the lab report in question was introduced by Central Baptist’s expert Cynthia Apple-gate. The trial court limited her testimony on the topic to a statement that the lab report did not show any irregularities because Ms. Applegate was not identified as an expert qualified to interpret the lab report. The lab report was stipulated into evidence as being one of Ms. Miller’s medical records. Ms. Dunn and Ms. Ap-plegate were both permitted to read from the record but not interpret its results. Likewise, counsel for both Central Baptist and Ms. Miller were p o., 796 S.W.2d 868 (Ky.App.1990). 12 . 809 S.W.2d 717, 719 (Ky.App.1991). 13 . Id. at 718-19. 14 . 979 S.W.2d 114, 118 (1998). 15 . O'Bryan v. Hedgespeth, 892 S.W.2d 571, 576 (Ky.1995) (<HOLDING>); 22 AM Jur.2d Damages 409 (2004). 16 . 22 AM
holding that the lower court failed to account for payments made in connection with the marital home including mortgage payments holding social security disability payments and military disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage holding statute allowing evidence of collateral source payments unconstitutional holding that unemployment compensation benefits received by plaintiff are collateral source and that defendant could not reduce personal injury damages because of such benefits holding pennsylvania replevin statute unconstitutional