offenses, it is presumed that sentences for these offenses will be served concurrently. State v. Crocker, 409 N.W.2d 840, 845 (Minn.1987). But under certain circumstances, consecutive sentences may be imposed without departing from the sentencing guidelines. Minn. Sent. Guidelines II.F. For example, when a defendant has “[mjultiple current felony convictions for crimes against persons” and the presumptive disposition for the offenses is commitment to the commissioner of corrections, consecutive sentencing is permissive without departure from the sentencing guidelines. Id. Permissive consecutive sentencing is available under this exception only when the presumptive disposition for the offenses is commitment to the commissioner of corrections. Id.; see also Watkins, 650 N.W.2d at 743 (<HOLDING>). If permissive consecutive sentencing is not
holding that felony conviction for which imposition of sentence was stayed could be counted as prior felony conviction under sentencing guidelines holding that the illinois crime of failure to report for imprisonment is not a violent felony for purposes of the armed career criminal act holding that proof of an agreement to commit a felony is not a necessary element in a conviction for the commission of the felony holding that when prior felony sentence for crime against person has not been discharged and imprisonment is presumptive for current felony sentence permissive consecutive sentencing is available holding that drug felony under state law can constitute an aggravated felony for federal sentencing guidelines purposes even if the same conduct would not constitute a felony under federal law