abusive. The evidence supports the jury’s finding of guilt. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. Conclusion After thoroughly reviewing the record before this Court, we conclude that there is no reversible error and accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed, 1 . Nurse practitioners can prescribe medication as long as they are supervised by a physician. 2 . Within the appellant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence, she asserts that the trial court gave erroneous jury instructions as to the definition of "knowingly.” Because the appellant did not challenge the jury instructions in a motion for new trial, any issue regarding jury instructions has been waived. See Tenn. R.App. P. 3(e); see also State v. Martin, 940 S.W.2d 567, 569 (Tenn. 1997)
holding that a defendant relinquishes the right to argue on appeal any issues that should have been presented in a motion for new trial holding that the failure to obtain a ruling on a motion for new trial waives the issues raised for appellate review holding that issues not properly presented to the bankruptcy court  cannot be raised  for the first time on appeal holding where record fails to establish whether and how appellant presented motion for new trial to the trial court it was not timely presented holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court