second assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by imposing attorney fees in the amount of $1,352 when the record was silent as to her ability to pay them. Defendant acknowledges that she did not object at the time, but argues that the court committed plain error and urges us to exercise our discretion to correct the error. The state concedes that the trial court committed plain error in imposing those fees. See ORS 151.505(3) (“The court may not require a person to pay costs under this section unless the person is or may be able to pay the costs.”); ORS 161.665(4) (“The court may not sentence a defendant to pay costs under this section unless the defendant is or may be able to pay them.”); see also State v. Coverstone, 260 Or App 714, 716, 320 P3d 670 (2014) (<HOLDING>). We accept the state’s concession and, for the
holding that imposition of courtappointed attorney fees is plain error when the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered holding that a trial court commits plain error by imposing courtappointed attorney fees where the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered holding that courts may require one or both parents to pay for a courtappointed attorney for their children holding that it is plain error for a trial court to require a defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees in the absence of legally sufficient evidence that defendant has the ability to pay the amount imposed holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to require a defendant to pay all back taxes