necessary if contract formed under § 2-207(1)). Section 2-207(2) provides: [t]he additional terms are to be construed as proposals for addition to the contract. Between merchants such terms become part of the contract unless: (a) the offer expressly limits acceptance to the terms of the offer; (b) they materially alter it; or (c) notification of objection to them has already been given or is given within a reasonable time after notice of them is received. However, because the parties did not form a contract under § 2-207(1), we need not address Christy's arguments as to the applicability of § 2-207(2). 4 . Courts and commentators have read § 2-207(3)'s reference to “supplementary terms” differently. Compare Dresser Indus., Inc. v. Gradall Co., 965 F.2d 1442, 1451 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); 2 W. Hawkland, Uniform Commercial Code Series
holding that all of the uccs provisions should be used in discerning the terms of a contract under  22073 including those provisions that allow us to examine the parties performance holding that contracts should be interpreted to give effect to all provisions holding that the hearing provisions of the ina supersede the provisions of the apa holding that construction that neutralizes any provision of a contract should not be adopted if the contract can be construed to give effect to all provisions holding that a contract should be read to give reasonable meaning to all provisions of that contract