accrues.” State ex rel. Nixon v. Turpin, 994 S.W.2d 53, 59 (Mo.App.1999). Here, the dispositive issue is when Winchester’s right of distribution accrued. Neither trust explicitly required a beneficiary to survive until the date of distribution in order to receive trust assets. In the absence of language clearly expressing such an intent, the law favors the vesting of legal or equitable estates at the earliest possible time. Lehmann v. Janes, 409 S.W.2d 647, 656 (Mo.1966); Friedman v. Marshall, 876 S.W.2d 745, 748-49 (Mo.App.1994). Therefore, Winchester’s right to receive a distribution of trust assets accrued on the date of Wife’s death. This vested equitable estate passed to Winchester’s estate upon her death. See Mercantile Trust Co., N.A., v. Hardie, 39 S.W.3d 907, 913 (Mo.App.2001) (<HOLDING>). The existence of the spendt d point, they
holding that an invalid charge can be perfected through equitable tolling recognizing that the party can instead file a claim against the estate recognizing that a vested equitable estate can be passed through inheritance holding that the corpus of an inheritance is not included in a parents gross income but that the interest generated by an inheritance is holding inheritance received by debtor more than 180 days after filing but before conversion is property of chapter 7 estate