Gregory M. Burke appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing for lack of jurisdiction his appeal of a bankruptcy court’s order awarding sanctions. We review de novo, Alexander v. Delaney (In re Delaney), 29 F.3d 516, 517 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam), and we dismiss. The district court properly dismissed Burke’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Burke failed to timely file his notice of appeal within 10 days of entry of the bankruptcy court’s order awarding sanctions to the trustee. See Fed. R. Bankr.P. 8002(a) and (c); Anderson v. Mouradick (In re Mouradick), 13 F.3d 326, 327-28 (9th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Burke’s contention that the doctrine of
holding that it is proper to dismiss an appellants appeal for failure to file a brief or request an extension within the time allotted by the bankruptcy rules holding that a bankruptcy rule equivalent to rule 6a ala r civ p should be construed to give the benefit of extending the deadline for submission to the day after the holiday regardless of whether the deadline is expressed as the last day of a period of days or as a date certain holding that a bankruptcy court may not extend the 30day objection period holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal holding that the bankruptcy court could not extend a deadline for filing a notice of appeal beyond the 20 day extension period allowed by the bankruptcy rules