the Court’s attention in the underlying criminal case.” However, the district court further noted that “no motion or request for relief was ever filed on this issue.” Thereafter, McCamey pleaded guilty to • reduced charges and was. sentenced. The district court ruled that McCamey was not eligible for relief under the PCRA on this claim because he failed to pursue it in the district court or on appeal, ¶ 9 The district court did not err in determining that the" statute of limitations claim was barred under section 78B-9-106(l)(c) of the PCRA unless the exception in section 78B-9-106(3) applied. In addition, by pleading guilty to the amended charges, McCamey waived any pre-plea issues, including statutory and constitutional claims. See State v. Rhinehart, 2007 UT 61, ¶ 15, 167 P.3d 1046 (<HOLDING>); James v. Galetka, 965 P.2d 567, 573 (Utah Ct.
recognizing that a voluntary and understanding guilty plea entered without the benefit of a plea bargain waives all nonjurisdictional defects that occurred before the entry of the plea holding entry of a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional issues holding that a voluntary guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings holding defendant by pleading guilty admits all essential elements of offense charged holding that by pleading guiltya defendant is deemed to have admitted the essential elements of the crime charged and thereby waives all nonjurisdictional defects including alleged preplea constitutional violations