determine only the rights of the parties involved in that particular proceeding and not impact the rights of others not involved in the proceeding. 10 City Plan, 121 Nev. at 432, 117 P.3d at 190. 11 Id. at 432, 117 P.3d at 191. 12 General Motors Corp. v. Ruckelshaus, 742 F.2d 1561, 1565 (D.C. Cir. 1984). 13 We similarly reject the argument that the Labor Commissioner’s actions in this case are exempted from the requirements of the APA because the Labor Commissioner was engaging in rate-making, which includes the integral duty to classify those jobs entitled to the prevailing wage. This court has previously noted that decisions involving rate-making are also subject to the requirements of the APA. See State Farm Mut. v. Comm’r of Ins., 114 Nev. 535, 543-44, 958 P.2d 733, 738 (1998) (<HOLDING>); see Public Serv. Comm’n v. Southwest Gas, 99
holding that under georgia law a holder of a master insurance policy is an agent of the insurance company and not the insurer holding that notice and a hearing were required before the commissioner of insurance could require an insurance company to change its definition of at fault in order to secure approval of an increase in insurance rates holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract holding that under minnesota law an insurance policy or provision not filed with the commissioner of insurance is unenforceable holding that even if an insurance broker is the agent of the insurance company for purposes of soliciting and procuring the policy that would not necessarily make the broker the agent of the insurance company for the purpose of receiving notice of suits and claims