The relevant inquiry under this section is whether there is evidence that a parental course of conduct endangered the child’s physical or emotional well-being. Jordan v. Dossey, 325 S.W.3d 700, 723 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. denied) (citing In re R.D., 955 S.W.2d 364, 368 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, pet. denied)); see also In re J.J.S., 272 S.W.3d 74, 78 (Tex.App.-Waco 2008, pet. struck) (observing that termination under subsection E must be based on voluntary, deliberate, and conscious course of conduct, not single act or omission). “[Endangering conduct is not limited to actions directed toward the child”; “endangering conduct may include the parent’s actions before the child’s birth, while the parent had custody of older childrenf.]” J.O.A., 283 S.W.3d at 345 (<HOLDING>); see Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Boyd, 727
holding as relevant in a murder case a history of domestic violence involving defendant and his victim holding that previous domestic violence finding did not have res judicata effect in proceeding to modify visitation because domestic violence and visitation modification proceedings are different causes of action holding that fathers history of domestic violence toward mother admitted marijuana use and previous incarceration on criminal charges that were later dismissed constituted legally sufficient evidence of endangerment holding evidence legally sufficient holding evidence that mother allowed child to remain in home in which there was violent conduct as evidenced by fathers physical abuse of mother during her pregnancy was legally sufficient to support termination