in compliance with judicial order, or pursuant to any lawfully issued subpoena, upon condition that parents and the students are notified of all such orders or subpoenas in advance of the compliance therewith by the educational institution or agency. 20 U.S.C. § 1232g(b)(2). The federal regulations track the statute and allow disclosure without consent if “[t]he disclosure is to comply with a judicial order or lawfully issued subpoena.” 34 C.F.R. § 99.31(a)(9)(i) (July 1, 2006 and October 13, 2006). Thus, there is no statutory bar precluding production of the records, only requirements that must be met before disclosure can occur. ¶ 18 In general, a privilege will protect records from disclosure even by court order. See Ornelas v. Fry, 151 Ariz. 324, 329, 727 P.2d 819, 824 (App.1986) (<HOLDING>); Bain v. Superior Court, 148 Ariz. 331, 333,
holding that a hospitals records of a patients treatment for alcoholism were protected by the physicianpatient privilege emphasis added and were therefore not discoverable in an action attempting to prove that the patient had a problem with alcohol holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physicianpatient privilege in homicide trials recognizing the tort of breach of physicianpatient privilege holding that a patients settlement of a prior action brought against him by doctors for payment of a bill did not bar medical malpractice action against doctors holding that plaintiffs may not compel discovery of a doctors alcoholism treatment records pursuant to ars  122235 2003 physicianpatient privilege in negligence action against doctor