knew the vehicle Appellant was driving had been stolen; Michael Brooks had previously informed Investigator Hilliard that Appellant was currently driving a stolen Dodge truck and that Appellant had taken the VIN plate from a Dodge truck he owned and placed it onto the stolen Dodge truck he was driving. And Investigator Hilliard had previously seen a Dodge truck on Appellant’s property with a missing VIN plate. This reasonably trustworthy information gave the officers probable cause to arrest Appellant without a warrant for committing the offenses of theft, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, or tampering with vehicle identification numbers. See Tex. Penal Code §§ 31.03, .07(a) (Vernon 2003), .11(a) (Vernon Supp. 2009); Brown v. State, 986 S.W.2d 50, 52 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1999, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). . Because the arresting officers witnessed
holding that the officers examination revealed that there was probable cause to believe that the property was stolen holding computer database report indicating vehicle was stolen provided officers with probable cause to make warrantless arrest of driver holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry holding  1983 action lies for warrantless arrest without probable cause