Amundson & Assocs., 988 P.2d at 1216 (“If proposed rates are filed with and approved by the insurance commissioner, the filed rate doctrine applies. . . . The insurance commissioner has the sole power of regulating the rates and that power includes examining any information deemed necessary to determine the excessiveness or adequacy of the rates.”); N.C. Steel Inc. v. National Council on Compensation Insurance, 496 S.E.2d 369 (N.C. 1998) (“The General Assembly has given the insurance commissioner the duty of setting rates.... We do not believe that... the General Assembly intended that duly set rates be challenged in another forum. When the commissioner approved the rates, they became the proper rates.”). Cf. Kentucky v. Anthem Insurance Cos. Inc., 8 S.W.3d 48 (Ky. Ct. App. 1999) (<HOLDING>). But see Allan Kanner, The Filed Rate Doctrine
holding that the respondents statelaw claims are barred by the filed rate doctrine holding that debtors request for reinstatement was not barred by judicial estoppel holding that under the filed rate doctrine a question regarding reasonable rates should be addressed to the department of insurance and that the rate plaintiff was charged is conclusively presumed reasonable under the filed rate doctrine holding that the filed rate doctrine barred request for damages but did not preclude request for injunction and civil penalties holding that the filed rate doctrine barred private right of action for consumer fraud