93 . 136 S.Ct. at 2001, 2002, 2004 (discussing 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1)(A) as relevant provision). 94 . 31 U.S.C. § 3729(b)(4). 95 . U.S. ex rel. Loughren v. Unum Grp., 613 F.3d 300, 307 (1st Cir. 2010) ("We have long held that the FCA is subject to a judicially-imposed requirement that the allegedly false claim or statement be material.”); U.S. ex rel. Berge v. Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Al., 104 F.3d 1453, 1459 (4th Cir. 1997) ("[W]e now make explicit that the current civil False Claims Act imposes a materiality requirement.”); U.S. ex rel. Longhi v. U.S., 575 F.3d 458, 468-70 (5th Cir. 2009) (discussing "proper standard for assessing the materiality of a false statement under the FCA’s civil-liability” provisions); United States v. Bourseau, 531 F.3d 1159, 1170-71 (9th Cir. 2008) (<HOLDING>); A+ Homecare, Inc., 400 F.3d at 442
holding that unlike  1001  1542 does not have a materiality requirement holding that 18 usc  1014 has no materiality requirement because the statute does not so much as mention materiality holding that materiality necessary element of section 1001 holding that the fca includes a materiality requirement holding that presentment is a requirement of the fca