of Appeals held that it is: The policy is not ambiguous. That ‘gasoline’ is referred to by terms other than ‘gasoline’ does not make the term ‘pollutants’ ambiguous. ‘Pollutants’ is clearly defined in the policy as including any liquid or gaseous contaminant. Gasoline is defined as a volatile flammable liquid hydrocarbon mixture blended from natural gas and petroleum. Gasoline which has leaked from its storage container and has contaminated the surrounding environment constitutes a pollutant within the meaning of the policy. Id. at 574 (citing Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, 1991, and upholding the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant based on the pollution exclusion); see also North Ga. Petroleum Co. v. Federated Mutual Ins. Co., 68 F.Supp.2d 1321, 1326-27 (<HOLDING>). Cases from other jurisdictions have also held
holding that an aqueduct entirely underground in places was a structure for purposes of the mechanics lien statute holding that a leakage of an underground petroleum tank was excluded from coverage by a similar definition of pollutants holding similar exclusion excluding coverage for any loss was clear and unambiguous and excluded coverage for um claims even though such claims were not expressly mentioned in the exclusion holding that contracts for an indefinite period are excluded from the statutes coverage holding that if an insurer denies coverage based on an assertion that the underlying claim is excluded from coverage there is a presumption that the insurer did not suffer prejudice because prompt notice would have merely resulted in an earlier denial of coverage