estimates of the robber’s age range from twenty-five to thirty-five years, centering on thirty years. P.Ex. M, Q. The bank photographs clearly show the robber wearing a mustache. P.Ex. S. The information available to the agents at plaintiff’s arrest was sufficient to justify a man of reasonable caution in believing that plaintiff had committed the robbery. That information, as a matter of law, constituted probable cause to believe that plaintiff had committed the robbery. Therefore, no action for malicious prosecution will lie. Zanghi, 752 F.2d at 45; compare Deary, 570 F.Supp. at 196, 200 (finding probable cause and granting summary judgment on malicious prosecution claim where arresting officers identified plaintiff from bank photographs), rev’d, 746 F.2d 185, 190 (3d Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>); Miss Universe, Inc. v. Patricelli, 753 F.2d
holding  1983 action lies for warrantless arrest without probable cause holding that in a  1983 action issue of probable cause is for the jury holding that there is no  1983 cause of action for false arrest unless the arresting officer lacked probable cause holding that the existence of probable cause in a  1983 case is a jury question recognizing the cause of action