The Prosecution intends this fact to support Investigator Fletcher’s objective reasonableness in relying on the warrant. I, on the other hand, view it as an indication that the unreasonable has become too common. In other words, it seem that when improper procedures become common place, they become something a reasonable officer can rely upon. 64 . Leon, 468 U.S. at 922, 104 S.Ct. 3405. 65 . United. States v. Novak, 870 F.2d 1345, 1353 (7th Cir.1989). 66 . Id. 67 . Doc. No. 94-2. 68 . Id. 69 . At the suppression hearing, the Prosecution conceded that this affidavit’s inference would allow the search of Swift's second home (if he had one) in New York City, New York, as well as a third (if he had it) in Memphis, Tennessee. 70 . See United States v. Ross, 487 F.3d 1120, 1 8th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Marion, 238 F.3d 965, 969
holding that executing officers reasonably relied on judges determination that there was probable cause to search motel room even though search warrant affidavit failed to mention a connection between motel room and criminal activity holding that a party failed to present any evidence to rebut inference that delay was unreasonable and inexcusable holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence holding that an affidavit failed to establish a connection between a residence and contraband but that it was not entirely unreasonable for the executing officer to believe that such an inference was permissible holding anticipatory warrant for search of defendants home was invalid because contraband was picked up by defendant rather than being delivered to his home and affidavit failed to provide facts establishing a nexus between contraband and defendants home