taxes if they are unable to demonstrate that their primary purpose is religious in nature. See Mid Vermont Christian Sch. v. Dep't of Emp't & Training, 178 Vt. 448, 885 A.2d 1210, 1212-13 (2005) (school not operated primarily for religious purposes; "although the school's Bible instruction, inculcation of Christian values and glorification of God were integral parts of the educational mission, the primary purpose is to provide a thorough education, combining traditional and modern subjects"); Baltimore Lutheran High Sch. Ass'n v. Emp't Sec. Admin., 302 Md. 649, 490 A.2d 701, 709 (1985) (finding no error in board's determination that school was not operated primarily for religious purposes);; but see Cmty. Lutheran Sch. v. Iowa Dep't of Job Serv., 326 N.W.2d 286, 291-92 (Iowa 1982) (<HOLDING>). T 26 Most analogous to EChO is a charitable
holding that a federallyfunded program in which public school teachers provided remedial education to disadvantaged children in parochial schools as well as public schools did not violate the establishment clause holding high school which allowed student secular noncurricular activities to meet on school property was required to provide equal access to a christian student group holding that separately incorporated parochial school which was created to to rear children in the christian faith in all their schooling  was exempt because it operated primarily for religious purposes holding that the establishment clause does not bar local school district from providing a publiclyemployed interpreter for a deaf student in a parochial school holding exempt under ors 307130 which relates to other charitable institutions a building that was used as an office for a religious official and religious court and a printing press for a religious publication