Co. v. United Transp. Union, 396 U.S. 142, 154-55, 90 S.Ct. 294, 24 L.Ed.2d 325 (1969)). 16 . United Steelworkers of Am. v. Warrior & Gulf Nav. Co., 363 U.S. 574, 578, 80 S.Ct. 1347, 4 L.Ed.2d 1409 (1960). 17 . Id. at 579, 80 S.Ct. 1347. 18 . Norris, 512 U.S. at 264-65, 114 S.Ct. 2239. 19 . Jones v. Roadway Express, Inc., 931 F.2d 1086, 1090 (5th Cir.1991). 20 . Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Labor Executives' Assn, 491 U.S. 299, 305, 109 S.Ct. 2477, 105 L.Ed.2d 250 (1989) (emphasis added). 21 . See Brown v. Ill. Cent. R.R. Co., 254 F.3d 654, 668 (7th Cir.2001) (“A claim brought under an independent federal statute is precluded by the RLA only if it can be disposi-tively resolved through an interpretation of a CBA. This occurs only when a provision of th F.3d 1416, 1419-20 (9th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). 25 .Ralph v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 135 F.3d
holding that a claim for discrimination in private employment is not preempted by title vii holding that physician was an independent contractor and thus could not sue hospital under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 holding that title vii claim is independent of cba and thus minor dispute holding that title vii claim was subject to compulsory arbitration holding that there is no individual liability under title vii