the [piece of furniture] ... wherein the innermost receptacle ... is slippery to prevent bed bugs from climbing out of the innermost receptacle (’511 Patent, ECFNo. 13-1, col. 11,11. 13-21) (alternation is for brevity and do not serve as a binding construction of the patent-in-suit’s claims). 5 . See Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc. v. ASUS Computer Int'l, 70 F.Supp.3d 654, 665 (D. Del. 2014) (discussing that Delaware’s long-arm statute's "arising from” language merely required that the defendant's acts set in motion the events forming the basis for the action, and thus a foreign defendant purposefully availed itself when its third-party retailer sold the accused products in Best Buy stores in Delaware); Robert Bosch LLC v. Alberee Products, Inc., 70 F.Supp.3d 665, 678 (D. Del. 2014) (<HOLDING>); cf. Ingeniador, LLC v. Interwoven, 874
holding that a contract for an exclusive agency to market a product contains an implied promise to use all reasonable efforts to market the product holding that if the reason the victim cannot testify at trial is that the accused murdered her then the accused should be deemed to have forfeited the confrontation right even though the act with which the accused is charged is the same as the one by which he allegedly rendered the witness unavailable holding that waiver by attorney was binding upon the accused when before the state introduced the evidence complained of on appeal counsel for the state in the presence of the accused and his counsel stated the agreement and the evidence of the witness was then read to the jury in the presence of the accused and his counsel without objection holding that a defendant had targeted the delaware market by selling the accused product to the nationwide reseller costco with the expectation that costco will sell the accused product in all parts of the united states including delaware holding that plaintiff could recover only damages sustained as a result of the sale of the accused product by defendant prior to the issuance date