Court’s denial of Rodriguez’s motion for postconviction relief on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its Opinion dated April 14, 2014. 1 . See Rodriguez v. State, 30 A.3d 764 (Del.2011). 2 . State v. Rodriguez, 2014 WL 1724778 (Del.Super.Apr. 14, 2014). 3 . Dawson v. State, 673 A.2d 1186, 1190 (Del.1996). 4 . Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 5 . Id. at 689, 104 S.Ct. 2052. 6 . Id. 7 . Albury v. State, 551 A.2d 53, 58 (Del.1988) (quoting Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052). 8 . Strickland, 466 U.S. at 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052. 9 . Id. at 692, 104 S.Ct. 2052. 10 . See Claudio v. State, 585 A.2d 1278, 1280 (Del.1991). 11 . See Manlove v. State, 527 A.2d 281, 1987 WL 37711, *1 (Del. June 3, 1987) (TABLE) (<HOLDING>); Swan v. State, 28 A.3d 362, 391 (Del.2011)
holding if one ground proves dispositive then this court need not address the remaining grounds relied on by a trial court when it granted summary judgment holding this court need not consider these criteria in any particular order or even address both if the defendant makes an insufficient showing on one holding that this court need not address the merits of an argument raised for the first time on appeal holding that this court will not consider a theory or issue that was not pleaded or raised in the trial court holding death sentence need not be pending in order for this court to engage in review of issues on appeal