As Judge Newman stated four years ago, "[w]e have neither the authority nor the inclination to retreat from that ruling.” Id. 11 . "Extra judicial killing” is defined ás "a deliberated killing” not authorized by the judgment of a court "affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples.” 28 U.S.C. § 1350 App. In this opinion, we J., concurring) (suggesting that, while international law triggers jurisdiction under ATCA, tort laws of forum state might provide substantive causes of action), and In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos, 978 F.2d at 503 (9th Cir.1992) (approving district court procedure that based jurisdiction on international law but applied tort law of slate where underlying events occurred); see also Filarti-ga, 630 F.2d at 889 (<HOLDING>). Because our decision regarding the forum non
holding that atca establishes cause of action for violations of international law but requiring the district court to perform a traditional choiceoflaw analysis to determine whether international law law of forum state or law of state where events occurred should provide substantive law in such an action holding that international law provides substantive law for atca cases holding that in cases of a false conflict of law a court may apply the law of the forum state holding that in a diversity action a federal court must apply the law of the forum state holding that federal courts presiding over causes of action created by state law should apply state substantive law but federal procedural law