a trade name of County Forest. His brief to this Court reiterates that this was his intent. This testimony establishes that he was not operating Porter Cash Fuel as a separate sole proprietorship, which might have permitted County Forest to escape liability. Because Porter operated Porter Cash Fuel as an agent for County Forest without disclosing that County Forest was the principal, he and County Forest are parties to the contract. See Restatement (Third) of Agency § 6.03. This result is consistent with the outcome of our prior cases. Treadwell, 2007 ME 150, ¶¶ 19-23, 938 A.2d 794; Me. Farmers Exch. v. McGillicuddy, 1997 ME 153, ¶¶ 2-4,10-11, 697 A.2d 1266; Estate of Saliba v. Dunning, 682 A.2d 224, 226 (Me.1996); see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. Barr, 2010 ME 124, ¶¶ 26-27, 9 A.3d 816 (<HOLDING>). [¶ 8] Our cases from an earlier era endorsed
holding officer personally liable because he agreed to personally guarantee payment on an account holding that a sole proprietor was personally liable for a contract she made before incorporating her business holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex holding that state officials may be personally liable for actions taken in their official capacity holding that the district court did not err in failing to address the defendant personally to determine whether she understood the rights she was waiving by admitting that she violated the conditions of her probation