activities triggering the forfeiture, not a single minor violation, and the offenses occurred over a period of time”). ¶ 21 The fine is also not grossly disproportional when compared to the monetary value Brent Brown gained by participating in the prohibited activity — i.e., the selling of cars by unlicensed salespeople. See MacLean, 733 N.E.2d at 1062. The Commission argued at the final agency hearing that if the average price of a car sold by an unlicensed salesperson during the relevant period was $20,000, the sale of 306 vehicles would result in sales worth $6,120,000. The $135,000 penalty divided by the 306 cars sold results in a fine of about $441 for each vehicle sold. Viewed this way, the fine is well within the limits of the Eighth Amendment. Compare LippeH, 148 F.3d at 978 (<HOLDING>), and San Huan New Materials High Tech, Inc. v.
holding a violation of the travel act holding that a penalty equal to two times the amount appellant received in violation of the federal antikickback act was not grossly disproportional holding no violation of the travel act holding that the penalty is applicable holding that a road not open to the public at all times was not a highway