4 . It further appears that defendant was ordered removed from the United States a third time, on June 25, 2003, but apparently was not actually deported on this occasion. 5 . It is clear that an alien who presents himself to immigration officials at a border entry point, as occurred here, has not been "found” in the United States as contemplated by the statute. See United States v. Zavala-Mendez, 411 F.3d 1116 (9th Cir.2005) (providing that "[a]n alien who crosses the border at a designated location and proceeds directly in the manner designated by the government to the border station where he then presents himself to the authorities has not been 'found in’ the United States for the purposes of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)”); United States v. Angeles-Mascote, 206 F.3d 529, 531 (5th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Canals-Jimenez, 943 F.2d
holding that the defendant was placed in official detention when two police officers approached him and told him that he was under arrest as the defendant could not reasonably have believed that he was free to leave holding that the defendant was not seized when two officers approached the defendant on a public street and asked him questions holding that no valid arrest had taken place before the search of the defendants person was conducted even though prior to that point a police officer had approached the defendant displayed his badge informed the defendant of his suspicions that the defendants luggage contained drug contraband informed the defendant of his constitutional rights and detained the defendant for twenty minutes after he had accompanied the officers to a police office located in the airport recognizing that any party who voluntarily approaches an ins station cannot be said to have been found or discovered in the united states holding that when a defendant voluntarily approached the immigration officer at the airport it cannot be said that he was discovered in or found in the united states