with A.D., and he admitted that he knew that she was thirteen years old. Even if Thompson wanted to argue that these admissions did not conclusively prove his guilt-either because he ceased his sexual relationship with A.D. as soon as he discovered her true age, or because he discovered A.D.'s true age only after their sexual relationship was over-the State was entitled to ask the jury to view Thompson's statements in a more inculpatory light. Conclusion For the reasons explained here, Judge Cutler did not abuse her discretion when she overruled Thompson's objections and allowed the State to introduce the two recordings and the transcripts derived from them. The judgement of the superior court is AFFIRMED. 1 . AS 11.41.436(a)(1). 2 . See State v. Glass, 583 P.2d 872 (Alaska 1978) (<HOLDING>). 3 . State v. Morris, 668 P.2d 857, 866
holding that the alaska constitution requires police to obtain judicial authorization before secretly recording a persons private conversations2 722 p2d 943 alaska 19863 862 p2d 181 alaska app199344 lewis 862 p2d at 186 quoting malkin 722 p2d at 946  n 6 holding outside context of recording of a minor childs phone conversations that a telephone extension used without authorization or consent to surreptitiously record a private telephone conversation is not used in the ordinary course of business  holding that police must prior to entering the home inform the person from whom consent is sought that he or she may lawfully refuse to consent to the search holding that under the alaska constitution the police must obtain a warrant before electronically monitoring or recording a private conversation even when one or more participants to the conversation consent to the police surveillance holding that the alaska constitution requires police to obtain judicial authorization before electronically monitoring or recording a persons private conversations