“failed to show by the record how the citation [in the advertisement] to page 3 rather than page 2 of the deed hook would chill the sale and cause the property to be bid at less than its fair market value ...”); Oates, 172 Ga. App. at 179 (2) (a) (confirming foreclosure despite error in advertisement listing the incorrect plat book because of evidence that it caused “no difficulty in locating the property using the description in the legal advertisement”). 15 Donalson, 177 Ga. at 91 (1). 16 See OCGA § 44-14-162.2 (a), which, in pertinent part, provides: to the property address or to such other address as the debtor may designate by written notice to the secured creditor. 17 See OCGA § 44-14-162.2 (b). 18 See Wright v. Barnett Mortgage Co., 226 Ga. App. 94, 96 (2) (485 SE2d 583) (1997) (<HOLDING>). 19 To the extent that Molina-Salas asserted a
recognizing cause of action for products liability in the absence of privity of contract in light of the foreseeable risk of harm caused by defective automobiles holding notice of balance due satisfies notice and demand requirements holding that notice of foreclosure that failed to provide a reinstatement balance was not defective in the absence of harm caused by the omission holding that debtors allegation that mortgage holder failed to provide him with the statutorily required notice of foreclosure was sufficient to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure holding that omission was not plain error