of "armed with a deadly weapon" and the requisite murder elements of "knowingly" and "kill." While the jury may have relied on the recovered knife to establish that Watkins was armed with a deadly weapon, it was separate forensic evidence that established Anderson's death as a knowing killing. Specifically, the jury was presented with evidence that Anderson's throat was penetrated five times, cutting through his carotid artery and into the cartilage of his larynx, and that Anderson displayed no defensive wounds. Additionally, cash, keys and marijuana were missing from Anderson's apartment. From this evidence alone it was clear that Anderson was knowingly killed and robbed by a perpetrator armed with a deadly weapon-most likely a knife. See Lewis v. State, 740 N.E.2d 550, 552 (Ind.2000) (<HOLDING>); and, Hampton v. State, 719 N.E.2d 803, 807
holding that there must be sufficient competent evidence from which the trier of fact could estimate the amount of damages with a reasonable degree of certainty holding that on a review of the sufficiency of the evidence the court determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt holding that a petitioner is entitled to habeas relief if no rational trier of fact could have found proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt holding in part that the severity of a victims injuries may be sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact can conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a victim has been knowingly killed holding that evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements  beyond a reasonable doubt