of adversary judicial proceedings, and extends to every critical stage of the proceedings A critical stage is any stage where' a substantial right of an accused may be affected ... and can arise in pre-trial as well as post-trial proceedings.’ Berry v. State, 630 So.2d 127, 129 (Ala.Crim.App.1993) (internal citations omitted).” Humphrey v. State, 110 So.3d 396, 398 (Ala.Crim.App.2012). “‘The King Court held that “the filing of a motion for a new trial is a critical stage of the prosecution and that an indigent defendant is entitled, to the assistance of counsel, absent a waiver, at that stage of the proceedings.” King v. State, 613 So.2d 888, 891 (Ala.Crim.App.1993). (Emphasis added.)’” Ex parte Pritchett, 117 So.3d at 360. See also Menefield v. Borg, 881 F.2d 696 (9th Cir.l989)(<HOLDING>). Thus, because the filing of Graham’s motion
holding postindictment lineup is critical stage of trial at which defendant is entitled to presence of counsel holding that posttrial motion for new trial is critical stage requiring counsel or valid waiver holding that a valid waiver of counsel at an early stage of the proceeding does not continue in effect through a subsequent stage holding that the filing of a motion for a new trial is a critical stage of the prosecution and that an indigent defendant is constitutionally entitled to the assistance of counsel at that stage holding that sentencing is a critical stage of criminal proceedings and the offer of counsel must be renewed at each critical stage where the defendant appears without counsel