did not err in allowing Dr. Newton to testify as an expert witness and in rejecting the Millers’ proposed instruction presuming Phillips’s notes to be complete and accurate. Furthermore, the court did not err, or it committed harmless error, in admitting evidence of Phillips’s knowledge and experience and lack of prior panic. We AFFIRM. EASTAUGH and FABE, JJ., not participating. 1 . Alaska Regional Hospital was known as Huma-na Hospital at the time. 2 . Decisions involving the admissibility of expert testimony are committed to the sound discretion of the trial court and are reviewed only for abuse of discretion. See Sweet v. Sisters of Providence in Washington, 895 P.2d 484, 494 n. 10 (Alaska 1995). 3 . See, e.g., Stigliano v. Connaught Lab., Inc., 140 NJ. 305, 658 A.2d 715, 719 (1995) (<HOLDING>); Thompson v. KFB Ins. Co., 252 Kan. 1010, 850
holding that as fact witnesses treating doctors in medical malpractice cases may testify in opinion form about their diagnoses and treatment of patients disorders including their determinations of disorders causes holding that a patients settlement of a prior action brought against him by doctors for payment of a bill did not bar medical malpractice action against doctors holding that doctors do not have to accept patients holding that doctor who was contacted by patients treating physician to discuss treatment alternatives does not owe duty of care to patient whose case is discussed such as would support medical malpractice claim holding that trial court abused its discretion by excluding expert opinion on causation where the expert relied upon scientific and clinical studies of the connection between collagen and autoimmune disorders as well as an examination of the plaintiff and her medical history