that the act was illegal. Lorenz, 823 P.2d at 109. The trial court granted BCBS’s motion for directed verdict solely on the grounds that Mariani failed to present evidence that the actions directed by her employer would violate a statute or clearly expressed public policy. The trial court made no factual findings regarding the remaining elements under Lorenz. We now conclude that Rule 7.3 is an expression of public policy, thereby overturning the trial court on that basis. We also briefly consider whether Mariani has presented sufficient evidence to establish a pri-ma facie case of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy. BCBS argues that Mariani failed to show that her supervisors directed her to perform an illegal act and that she refused to do 8, 417 A.2d 505, 512 (1980) (<HOLDING>); Payne v. Rozendaal, 147 Vt. 488, 520 A.2d
holding that sources of public policy include legislation administrative rules regulations or decisions and judicial decisions and in certain instances a professional code of ethics holding that rookerfeldman does not apply to state administrative decisions holding that this courts review of board decisions is limited to final orders or final decisions holding that judicial review of decisions of military correction boards is review of the administrative record conducted under the administrative procedure act holding that public policy may be found in letter or purpose of constitutional statutory or regulatory provisions in judicial decisions of state and in certain instances in professional codes of ethics