¶921-23. 9 . Id. ¶ 23. 10 . Id. ¶30 (Thorne, J., dissenting). 11 . Id. ¶31 (Thorne, J., dissenting). 12 . Id. ¶36 (Thorne, J., dissenting). 13 . Id. ¶34 (Thorne, J., dissenting). 14 . Id. ¶ 40 (Thorne, J., dissenting). 15 . Bear River Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wall, 1999 UT 33, ¶4, 978 P.2d 460. 16 . Frito-Lay v. Labor Comm'n, 2008 UT App 314, ¶10, 193 P.3d 665. 17 . Id. ¶¶ 16, 20, 23. 18 . Uiah Const. art. VIII, § 4. 19 . Entre Nous Club v. Toronto, 4 Utah 2d 98, 287 P.2d 670, 672 (1955). 20 . Utah Code Ann. § 63G-4-102(1)(a) (2008) (stating that UAPA governs state agency action). 21 . See, eg., Utah Code Ann. § 34A-2-420 (2005) (setting procedures specific to Labor Commission adjudications); see also Utah Chiropractic Ass'n v. Equitable Life Assurance Soc'y, 579 P.2d 1327, 1328 (UWiah 1978) (<HOLDING>). 22 . See State v. Briggs, 2008 UT 83, ¶ 14,
holding administrative tribunal need not mirror judicial procedures recognizing that we generally apply harmless error rule to administrative adjudications holding exhaustion is required regardless of the relief offered through administrative procedures holding that it would be inconsistent with congress intent to require exhaustion of optional appeals through state procedures after an aggrieved party has exhausted all administrative remedies expressly prescribed by congress in the administrative procedures act apa recognizing that the insurance code governs procedures for administrative adjudications