Amendment in 1998. Id. at 789 n. 38. But we explained that "allowing a discriminatory classification to remain in force is no different than giving it the force of law in the first place." Id. The same analysis applies here. 68 . 3 AAC 135.085(a). 69 . Per AS 34.15.110(b), married couples in Alaska who acquire real property co-own the property as tenants by the entirety unless the conveyance or devise specifies otherwise or unless they create a community trust under AS 35.77.100. Tenancy by the entirety is "[a] common-law estate in which each spouse [owns] the whole of the property. An estate by the entirety is based on the legal fiction that a husband and wife are a single unit." Brack's Law Dicrionary 627 (Oth ed.2009); see Faulk v. Estate of Haskins, 714 P.2d 354, 356 (Alaska 1986) (<HOLDING>); see also Smith v. Kofstad, 206 P.3d 441, 445
holding that marital property was not attachable for the sole debts of the husband because it was held in tenancy by entirety holding that bank accounts in husbands and wifes joint names were property in a tenancy by the entirety holding that husband and wifes failure to recite marital status in the deed did not defeat tenancy by the entirety holding that property held by husband and wife in tenancy by entirety is exempt from attachment or execution for the sole debts of husband holding that property held by husband and wife in tenancy by entirety cannot be reached by husbands creditors absent fraud