19, 1998, almost one year and eight months after the Debtor received his discharge. ANALYSIS The Debtor seeks dismissal of the Trustee’s § 727(d)(1) count because it was not filed within one year of his discharge, as required by § 727(e)(1). The Trustee concedes this fact, but argues that the doctrine of “equitable tolling” applies to toll the statute of limitations in § 727(e)(1) and make the f Y.1984) (not addressing equitable tolling because complaint was filed within one year of discharge, but stating that “while a discharge can be denied if the debtor conceals assets or otherwise deals dishonestly with his creditor, it passes beyond recall, whatever the facts, with the termination of the proceeding or the lapse of time.”); Ford v. Ford (In re Ford), 159 B.R. 590 (Bankr.D.Or.1993) (<HOLDING>). The only decision this court could locate
holding that rule 60b was not applicable to extend the time to file an action to revoke a discharge under grounds of mistake and not addressing equitable tolling holding that equitable tolling of the time to file a notice of appeal is not permitted holding  727d1 complaint was untimely and noting the one year period for filing runs from discharge rather than discovery of the fraud but not addressing expressly equitable tolling holding that the 120day filing period is subject to equitable tolling and addressing circumstances warranting equitable tolling recognizing that bankruptcy rule 9024 provides authority for the court to revoke a discharge