death claim, II. Discussion A party is entitled to summary judgment only when “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). “Ordinarily, we lack jurisdiction to hear an immediate appeal from a district court’s order denying summary judgment, because such an order is not a final decision.” Shannon v. Koehler, 616 F.3d 855, 860 (8th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). “[B]ut an immediate appeal is appropriate where summary judgment is denied on the grounds of sovereign immunity or qualified immunity, because immunity is effectively lost if a case is erroneously permitted to go to trial.” Argonaut Great Cent. Ins. Co. v. Audrain Cnty. Joint Commc’ns, 781 F.3d 925, 929-30 (8th Cir. 2015) (<HOLDING>). The scope of our review is limited to issues
holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable holding that the collateral order doctrine permitted interlocutory review of a denial of a motion for summary judgment under missouris sovereign immunity statute holding that the collateral order doctrine allows for immediate appellate review of the denial of an eleventh amendment immunity claim holding that as a general rule interlocutory trial court orders rejecting defenses of common law sovereign immunity governmental immunity public official immunity statutory immunity or any other type of immunity are not appealable under the maryland collateral order doctrine holding that an interlocutory appeal lies from a denial of summary judgment on a qualified immunity claim