or record”) (citations and punctuation omitted). Although its order contains no analysis of this issue, the trial court’s ruling that no judgment was entered until the DeKinders filed a civil case disposition form was apparently based on the sentence in OCGA § 9-11-58 (b) which provides that “no judgment shall be effective for any purpose until the entry of the same, as provided in this subsection.” We decline, however, to interpret this sentence as amending OCGA § 5-6-31 to require the filing of a civil case disposition form. Although this language existed in the prior version of OCGA § 9-11-58 (b), this Court has never interpreted it as imposing the procedural requirements of that statute on OCGA § 5-6-31. See Zeitman v. McBrayer, 201 Ga. App. 767 (2) (a) (412 SE2d 287) (1991) (<HOLDING>). See also Smith v. Smith, 165 Ga. App. 532,
holding that court had jurisdiction where no separate judgment had been entered even though notice of appeal was not timely filed as measured from the final decision recognizing that a final judgment may exist even where no judgment has been entered in accordance with ocga  91158 b recognizing that nonfinal orders may be revised at any time before a final judgment is entered recognizing that a final judgment may provide for a particular standard upon which to modify a final judgment holding that lack of a separate judgment does not preclude the taking of an appeal from a district courts final decision because the parties may waive the separate judgment requirement where one has accidentally not been entered