her recollection of the interview. The Federal Rules of Evidence permit witnesses to use reports to refresh their recollection. See Fed. R.Evid. 612. The testimony at trial revealed that Agent Denny prepared for trial by meeting with an Assistant U.S. Attorney and reviewing the FBI reports relating to Muhammad’s arrest and subsequent interview. Agent Denny testified that although Agent Gandolfo prepared the FBI 302 covering Muhammad’s interview, she reviewed that report for accuracy, made corrections to it, and signed it. In essence, the report was that of both Agent Gandolfo and Agent Denny. Agent Denny added that although she did not have independent recollection of all the ques 2198, 60 L.Ed.2d 755 (1979); see also United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191, 1221 (7th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Bastanipour, 697 F.2d 170,
holding that the confrontation clause does not apply to the sentencing hearing holding that any confrontation right is found in the fourteenth amendments due process clause not the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment holding that the governments failure to produce original 302s did not violate the confrontation clause holding coconspirator hearsay exception does not violate confrontation clause holding that doctrine does not violate right of confrontation