should be terminated. [T52] This argument fails first and foremost because termination of a trust is not permitted under Wyoming law if the continuance of the trust is necessary to carry out a material purpose of the trust, American Nat'l Bank, 899 P.2d at 1340; Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 4-10-411(a); Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 4-10-413(a). Holding the ranch in the Trust until the year 2100 is a material purpose of the Trust and requires continuation of the Trast. Sale of the ranch and termination of the Trast would obviously defeat that material purpose. Additionally, although the Trust's general provisions do give the trustee discretion to dispose of uneconomic assets, the more specific section 2.2.E applies when the asset to be sold is the ranch. See Douglas v. Newell, 719 P.2d 971, 973 (Wyo.1986) (<HOLDING>). Section 2.2.E limits sale of the ranch to
recognizing the general rule but finding the eo nomine provision in question to be more specific holding that specific statutes create exceptions to general statutes therefore if a provision of a specific statute is inconsistent with one in a general statute on the same subject the specific statute controls holding that where there is a conflict between statutes the more recent statute is controlling and a specific provision prevails over a general provision relating to the same subject matter holding wills more specific provision prevails over general provision holding that a specific statutory provision prevails over a more general one