this State by or on behalf of the defendant[.] These subsections are commonly referred to as jurisdiction based on a “local act” or based on a “local injury.” It is not sufficient for Mr. Stann to demonstrate that at least one of his causes of action falls within the long-arm statute. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-75.5 requires that there be a separate basis for jurisdiction for each cause of action: In any action brought in reliance upon jurisdictional grounds stated in subdivisions (2) to (10) of G.S. 1-75.4 there cannot be joined in the same action any other claim or cause against the defendant unless grounds exist under G.S. 1-75.4 for personal jurisdiction over the defendant as to the claim or cause to be joined. See also Godwin v. Walls, 118 N.C. App. 341, 352, 455 S.E.2d 473, 482 (1995) (<HOLDING>). I first consider N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-75.4(4)
holding that intentional infliction of emotional distress is a personal injury tort holding that although plaintiffs met their burden of establishing personal jurisdiction over their claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress under nc gen stat  17544 the longarm statute did not confer personal jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims for wrongful death and property damage holding that plaintiffs negligence and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are not independent of the breach of contract claim and summary judgment is warranted on these claims holding that the plaintiffs negligent misrepresentation and negligent infliction of emotional distress claims are governed by opla recognizing torts of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress