Anthony Moore, a prisoner convicted in state court but housed in federal prison, appeals from the district court’s judgment dismissing' his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The district court erred in holding that it lacked jurisdiction on the basis that Moore could not properly challenge the conditions of his confinement through a habeas petition. Under Hernandez v. Campbell, 204 F.3d 861, 864 (9th Cir. 2000), the 42 (9th Cir. 2016) (<HOLDING>). VACATED and REMANDED. ** This disposition is
holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001 holding that the relating to parenthetical in 18 usc  1961 was merely to aid identification of 18 usc  2314 rather than to limit its application holding that a district court is not authorized to sentence a defendant below the statutory minimum unless the government filed a substantial assistance motion pursuant to 18 usc  3553e and ussg  5k11 or the defendant falls within the safetyvalve of 18 usc  3553f holding for the purposes of 18 usc  924e that being a felon in possession of a firearm is not a violent felony as defined in 18 usc  924e2b holding that 18 usc  3625 does not preclude claims that the bop acted contrary to established federal law violated the constitution or exceeded its statutory authority when it acted pursuant to 18 usc  3621