barred. The benefit of the Apprendi decision is not available to a § 2255 movant whose conviction became final before June 26, 2000, the date Apprendi was issued. See In re Turner, 267 F.3d 225, 227 (3d Cir.2001) (announcing that the Supreme Court has not made Apprendi retroactive to cases on collateral review) (citing Tyler v. Cain, 533 U.S. 656, 121 S.Ct. 2478, 150 L.Ed.2d 632 (2001)). The Third Circuit affirmed Mangiardi’s conviction on October 27,1999 and the Supreme Court denied his petition for a writ of certiorari on April 3, 2000. Because Mangiardi’s conviction became final before June 26, 2000, he cannot raise an Apprendi claim in a motion under § 2255. Accord United States v. Jones, Nos. CR. 95-124-5, CIV. A. 99-3976, 2001 WL 1173980, at *11 (E.D.Pa. October 3, 2001) (<HOLDING>). CLAIMS FOR INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL
holding apprendi is not retroactive holding that apprendi does not retroactively apply to  2255 motions holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively in florida postconviction proceedings to cases that were final on direct review at the time of the apprendi decision holding that turner precluded an apprendi claim under  2255 because the defendants conviction became final before the issuance of apprendi holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively in florida in postconviction proceedings to cases that were final on direct review at the time of the apprendi decision