B. In recognition of, and to the extent of the common jurisdiction and goals of the two (2) Agencies, and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the FEPA and the EEOC hereby agree to the terms of this Worksharing Agreement, which is designed to provide individuals with an efficient procedure for obtaining redress for their grievances under appropriate State of Virginia and Federal laws. II. Filing of Charges of Discrimination A. In order to facilitate the assertion of employment rights, the EEOC and the FEPA each designate the other as its agent for the purpose of receiving and drafting charges, including those that are not jurisdictional with the agency tha .T., Inc., Civ. Action No. 98-0409-R, 59 F.Supp.2d 572 (W.D.Va., Roanoke Div., July 28, 1999) (<HOLDING>); Flippo v. American Home Prods., 59 F.Supp.2d
holding that denial of remand was proper where plaintiff failed to raise the proper objection holding that jurisdiction in federal court is proper where plaintiff checked box and eeoc transmitted charge but vchr declined to investigate recognizing that pleadings filed in federal court while the federal court has jurisdiction become part of the state court record on remand holding that the trial court should have declined jurisdiction in declaratory action to avoid depriving real plaintiff of traditional right to choose time and place of suit holding venue proper where proper when the action was commenced