Corp., B-414220.2, Mar. 27, 2017, 2017 WL 1316186; Continental Service Group Inc.’s ("Continental”) March 28, 2017 Complaint ("3/28/17 Continental Compl.”); the March 28, 2017 Declaration of J, Christopher Lang, Continental’s Vice President of Contract Administration ("3/28/17 Lang Decl.’’); the April 4, 2017 Declaration of Patty Queen-Harper, Contracting Officer for the United States Department of Education ("ED”) ("4/4/17 Queen-Harper Decl.”); Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc.'s ("Pioneer”) April 10, 2017 Complaint ("4/10/17 Pioneer Compl.”); evidence adduced at an oral argument held on May 2, 2017 ("5/2/17 TR at 1-160”); and the Government’s May 19, 2017 Notice Of Corrective Action ("5/19/17 Gov’t Notice). See Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573, 1583-84 (Fed. Cir. 1993) (<HOLDING>). 2 . On April 10, 2017, the court extended the
holding that the court can look beyond the face of the pleadings in order to find predicate jurisdictional facts when deciding a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction holding that in a motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction a court may resolve disputed factual issues by reference to evidence outside the pleadings including affidavits holding that the standard for a motion for judgment on the pleadings is the same as the standard for a motion to dismiss holding a decision denying a motion to dismiss an action for lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction is not appealable holding that district court has discretion when deciding to convert a defendants motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment