CURIAM. The defendant appeals from the denial of his Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. We affirm on the authority of State v. Del Castillo, 890 So.2d 376 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)(<HOLDING>); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807, 808 (Fla. 2d
holding that where original sentencing judge imposed a guidelines sentence defendant could not be sentenced as a habitual offender upon violation of probation holding that a defendant sentenced as an habitual offender who later successfully challenges one of his predicate offenses may have his habitual offender status and sentencing enhancement vacated through postconviction relief or a motion to correct erroneous sentence holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony holding that defendants habitual traffic violator conviction could also serve as a predicate felony conviction under the general habitual offender statute holding that predicate crimes for which defendant received probation and adjudication could be considered for purposes of habitual offender enhancement