if it would be useful to the court. In light of our disposition, the precise contours of the recommended sanction are irrelevant, and the court denied Bar Counsel’s motion. 4 . Schoeneman contends that his resignation from the Virginia Bar should not be considered discipline because no formal charges had been filed against him. We need not reach that issue, however, because we find that his alleged actions do not constitute misconduct even if his resignation were considered to be a disciplinary action. We thus assume, without deciding, that Schoeneman was disciplined by the Virginia Bar. 5 . Although the summary from Virginia Bar Counsel indicates that Schoeneman "admitted” to not creating a trust account, implying that he waived his due process rights, see In re Day, 717 A.2d at 886 (<HOLDING>), no evidence on the record indicates that
holding that a person has standing to bring suit under the civil rights act if she or he can show that she or he was punished for trying to vindicate the rights of minorities recognizing the right to waive a jury trial holding that unless an officer can prove that he or she has a specific basis or belief that an individual was involved in criminal activity their detention will be deemed unconstitutional holding that a suspect must be warned prior to any questioning that he has the right to remain silent that anything he says can be used against him in a court of law that he has the right to the presence of an attorney and that if he cannot afford an attorney one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning if he so desires holding that an individual can waive any process to which he or she has a right