motion seemed to assert that he was arrested’in the Dade County jail for the violation of community control, if his allegations are correct, he is entitled to the jail credit he seeks. See Saunders v. State, 661 So.2d 134 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (remanding for attachment of record refuting claim or for award of credit on appellant’s claim that he was entitled to credit for time served in another county’s jail after being served there with an arrest warrant but prior to being transferred to Broward County); Price v. State, 598 So.2d 215 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (defendant entitled to time served from date arrest warrant served). We affirm without prejudice to Appellant raising this claim in a rule 3.800(a) motion which complies with Toro v. State, 719 So.2d 947, 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (<HOLDING>). Appellant failed to even reference the
holding that trial strategy will be reviewed by appellate courts only if the record demonstrates that action was without any plausible basis holding that fiduciaries cannot shut their eyes to readily available information when the evidence in the record suggests that the information might confirm the beneficiarys theory of entitlement and when they have little or no evidence in the record to refute that theory holding that with regards to jail credit claims at a minimum the motion will have to allege where in the record the information can be located and explain how the record demonstrates entitlement to the relief requested holding that the burden is on the appellant to bring forth a record that demonstrates error holding that requiring notice and comment is not required where the record demonstrates that the agency in fact has had the benefit of petitioners comments