C. Location of Material Events and Evidence Third, the Court weighs the location of material events and material evidence. Collins, 2014 WL 279865, at *2; Brotherhood Mut. Ins. Co., 2011 WL 1627114, at *2. As already stated, Indiana has a substantial connection to the material events of this case. However, given that Mr. Long lives and primarily conducted his business on the West Coast of the United States, Washington also bears a significant connection to the material events. CAI acknowledges that most of the material evidence in this case is documentary or electronic in nature and notes that it is stored in both forums. In such circumstances, courts frequently consider this factor to be neutral in the decision to transfer. See, e.g., Bruce Lee Enters., LLC, 2010 WL 989909, at *2, *4 (<HOLDING>); Picker Int'l, Inc. v. Travelers Indem. Co.,
holding in a case involving denial of coverage under an insurance contract that the location of documentary evidence related to insurance coverage mattered less than the location of the underlying tort suits holding location of named driver exclusion in endorsement did not make it ambiguous exclusion applied to all coverage afforded by the policy including the um coverage holding that the plaintiffs asserted legal basis for coverage is irrelevant to the determination of whether the insurance policy provides coverage and instead looking to the facts underlying the claim for coverage holding in mcgee limited to suits involving contract of insurance holding that insurers failure to deny existence of insurance coverage under policy at issue was to admit that coverage existed