Agreement, dictate a narrow interpretation of the fifth Dispute Item. The first four specific Dispute Items are clearly of a different character than the fifth, which provides for arbitration of “any disputes regarding a party’s obligations under this Agreement.” Termination Agreement at 18. But the most obvious reading of the arbitration clause as a whole — especially in light of the mandate to construe ambiguities in favor of arbitration — is that it established four specific categories that the parties anticipated would be the subject of disputes, followed by a final “catch-all” category of disputes that could not be anticipated with particularity, but that the parties intended to resolve through arbitration. See Ga. Power Co. v. Cimarron Coal Corp., 526 F.2d 101, 106 (6th Cir.1975) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, just as there is no conflict
holding that a contract provision was arbitrable after concluding that it lacked the specific details of the other portions of the agreement  but that was a result of the fact that it was something of a catchall provision designed to take care of the kinds of changes which cannot be predicted in detail but which experience teaches do occur holding that an insurer lacked standing to raise the issue of the intent of the parties to the settlement agreement to which it was not a party holding that a provision of the constitution is to be construed in the sense in which it was understood by the framers and the people at the time of its adoption but that if new products or circumstances that did not exist at the time the constitutional provision was enacted fall within the meaning of the provision the constitutional provision applies to them holding that defendants testimony that he did not see a provision in the agreement because the plaintiffcounterparty failed to direct him to the provision was insufficient as a matter of law to establish fraud and defendant was therefore bound to the terms of the provision holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur