the government’s motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the district court’s restitution order. AFFIRMED. 1 . With respect to restitution generally, the plea agreement stated that “defendant agrees to the entry of a Restitution Order for the full amount of the victims' losses as determined by the Court," and provided that within thirty days after sentencing Appellant and Aida Zia-deh would deliver a note payable to the government in the full amount of restitution ordered by the district court, and notes that the district court wo ir.1996) (stating issues not addressed in brief or oral argument are waived); 11126 Baltimore Blvd., Inc. v. Prince George’s County, Md., 58 F.3d 988, 993 n. 7 (4th Cir.1995) (same); United States v. Williams, 378 F.2d 665, 666 (4th Cir.1967) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Furthermore, at the sentencing hearing,
holding that claims made but not argued in a brief are waived holding issues argued orally but not addressed in brief were waived holding that an issue mentioned in a brief but not addressed is waived holding that issues not specifically raised and argued in a partys opening brief are waived holding that issues not argued in initial brief are deemed waived