only his or her liability and does not extinguish the liability of the other joint tort-feasors from whom contribution is sought.”); The Doctors Co. v. Vincent, 120 Nev. 644, 98 P.3d 681, 683 (2004) ("[A] joint tortfeasor seeking to perfect a contribution claim in the context of a settlement must first extinguish the liabilities of the other joint tortfeasors against whom contribution recovery is sought.”); Husni v. Meden, 94 Ohio App.3d 465, 640 N.E.2d 1207 (1994) (barring contribution claim where release did not extinguish joint tortfeasor’s liability); Schuman v. Vitale, 144 Pa. Cmwlth. 560, 602 A.2d 390 (1992) (same); G & P Trucking v. Parks Auto Sales Service & Salvage, Inc., 357 S.C. 82, 591 S.E.2d 42 (Ct.App.2003) (same); Kirk v. Moe, 114 Wash.2d 550, 789 P.2d 84 (1990) (<HOLDING>). 10 . In fact, this concept was articulated in
recognizing right of contribution against joint tortfeasor where release is obtained on his behalf recognizing necessity of release of joint tortfeasor against whom contribution is sought recognizing a right to contribution recognizing ability of one or more joint tortfeasors to settle on behalf of themselves and another joint tortfeasor and then pursue that joint tortfeasor for its share of the settlement payment holding that contribution will lie where no statute precludes recovery from the joint tortfeasor against whom contribution is sought