demonstrated sufficient “cause” to obtain relief from the stay. Allowing the Lawsuit to proceed would have a substantial adverse effect on the estate and other Recall Claimants. The Court will therefore deny Swain’s motion. The Court will, however, set a status conference in the near future on the Trustee’s insurance policy buy back efforts. If it appears that the Trustee will not be able, timely, to pool the available insurance funds for the benefit of Swain and the other Recall Claimants, the Court will revisit Swain’s stay relief request. A separate order will be entered consistent with this Memorandum Opinion. 1 . In making these findings, the Court took judicial notice of the docket. See St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp., 605 F.2d 1169, 1172 (10th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>); In re Mailman Steam Carpet Cleaning Corp.,
recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice recognizing a district judge may dismiss a case sua sponte under either rule 41b or its inherent authority to manage its docket recognizing that the court may take judicial notice of its own docket holding that a court may sua sponte take judicial notice of its docket recognizing that a district court may sua sponte dismiss a complaint for failure to serve after notice to the plaintiff