under proper instructions”). Indeed, even the Court in Strassheim v Daily, 221 US 280; 31 S Ct 558; 55 L Ed 735 (1911), recognized that the resolution of disputed facts was for the jury when it noted that if the jury believed that the defendant had committed the acts complained of, Michigan would be justified in punishing the defendant. Similarly, if the jury in this case believes that Blume knew that Hoyt would be returning to Michigan to split the cocaine with another, and armed with that knowledge, supplied the cocaine to be split to Hoyt, then the intent to create a detrimental effect in Michigan, he g five bases: territorial, national, protective, universality, and passive per sonality); George, Extraterritorial application of penal legislation, 64 Mich L R 609, 613-614 (1966) (<HOLDING>); Perkins, The territorial principle in
recognizing six bases territorial floating territory protected interest nationality of the offender nationality of the victim and universality recognizing three bases common law or territorial significant activity and integral relation recognizing five bases territorial national protective universal and passive personality recognizing four bases territorial roman injured forum cosmopolitan recognizing six bases territorial national protective universal passive personality and objective territorial