potentially applicable statute of limitations, and the one applied by the hearing officer, is the two-year period contained in the Oregon Tort Claims Act (“OTCA”), ORS §§ 30.260 to 30.302. Under Oregon law, a claim alleging a public body’s breach of duty imposed by statute is governed by the OTCA. See ORS §§ 30.260(8) (defining “tort”) and 30.265 (discussing the scope of the OTCA). With two exceptions that do not apply to this case, the limitations period for any claim to which the OTCA applies is two years. ORS § 30.275(8). The Oregon Court of Appeals has held specifically that this two-year limitations period applies to a claim against a public body arising from a breach of duties imposed by a federal statute. See Butterfield v. Oregon, 163 Or. App. 227, 987 P.2d 569, 574-75 (1999) (<HOLDING>). As discussed above, S.V. asserts that the
holding that sixmonth duty of fair representation statute of limitations applicable to claim alleging breach of union contract holding that sovereign immunity barred a post alden claim under the fair labor standards act for money damages asserted against the state in state court holding claims based on the fair labor standards act subject to arbitration holding right to liquidated damages under fair labor standards act nonwaivable holding that the otca limitations period applied to a claim alleging a breach of the fair labor standards act by the state