(8), shall direct remission of up to, but not more than, 100 percent of a forfeiture if the surety apprehended and surrendered the defendant or if the apprehension or surrender of the defendant was substantially procured or caused by the surety, or the surety has substantially attempted to procure or cause the apprehension or surrender of the defendant, and the delay has not thwarted the proper prosecution of the defendant. We review the trial court’s order for an abuse of discretion. See Accredited Sur. & Cas. Co., Inc. v. Putnam Cnty., Fla., 528 So.2d 430, 431 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Palmetto contended that it substantially attempted to procure or cause the apprehension or surrender of the defendant. See Conti Heritage Ins. Co. v. Orange Cnty., 798 So.2d 837 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (<HOLDING>); Cnty. Bonding Agency v. State, 724 So.2d 131
holding that doctrine of impossibility of performance did not apply so as to entitle surety to partial remission of forfeited bond holding that taxable costs included only the premium on a surety bond posted on appeal not the fees paid for letters of credit to secure the bond where the state statute and court rule only specifically allowed for premium on any surety bond recognizing that the gjovernment as obligee owes no equitable duty to a surety  unless the surety notifies the government that the principal has defaulted under the bond  notice by the surety is essential before any governmental duty exists holding that substantial attempts by surety may entitle it to remission of bond forfeiture holding that where surety was given until date of forfeiture hearing to produce defendant and defendant was killed by police before that date bond would not be forfeited