a result of wrongful state conduct, especially when the loss is an indirect result of that conduct. Harpole v. Arkansas Dept. of Human Services, supra at 927-28. In our considered view, the Court’s analysis, in Harpole, inclusive of its favorable discussion of Ortiz, reflects that the Eighth Circuit has joined with the Fourth, First, and Sixth Circuits, in requiring a parent, who seeks to maintain a Section 1983 claim, which is based upon the loss of association with a child, to demonstrate that the State action was aimed directly at the parent-child relationship. See, Pittsley v. Warish, 927 F.2d 3, 8 (1st Cir.1991); Shaw v. Stroud, 13 F.3d 791, 794 (4th Cir.1994); Jaco v. Bloechle, 739 F.2d 239 (6th Cir.1984); but see, Kelson v. City of Springfield, 767 F.2d 651, 656 (9th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Given this alignment, the Court’s decision,
recognizing in dictum parents right to care custody management and companionship of their children recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children recognizing that a parents liberty interest in the custody of a child is subject to due process protection holding that parents possessed a constitutionally protected liberty interest in the companionship of their child where they filed a section 1983 claim arising out of the suicide of their son while he was at school recognizing that foster parents do not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in a continued relationship with their foster child