to disturb the peace is that conduct which is inconsistent with the peaceable and orderly conduct of society.” State v. Correa, 147 N.M. 291, 222 P.3d 1, 7 (2009) (internal quotation marks omitted). This includes an act that “disturbs the peace and tranquility of the community.” Id. at 9 (internal quotation marks omitted). Mocek argues that he was calm throughout the ordeal and did not disturb other travelers. But the complaint alleges that when police arrived, the TSA agents told them he had been “causing a disturbance,” refused orders to put down his camera, and was filming the agents. App. 018-19. Officer Dilley, the arresting officer, was entitled to rely in good faith bn these representations of Mocek’s earlier conduct. Albright v. Rodriguez, 51 F.3d 1531, 1536 (10th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Foote v. Spiegel, 118 F.3d 1416,
holding that plaintiffs had standing to challenge stops by the united states border patrol because plaintiffs could be stopped without engaging in illegal conduct holding that a person could not reasonably rely on oral representations that contradict a written document holding that a border patrol agents blocking the stopped vehicle approaching the vehicle with his gun drawn and interrogating the individual about his citizenship and immigration status did not convert the stop into a custodial arrest holding an officers reasonablesuspicion determination could rely on border patrol agents representations of events that occurred before the officer arrived holding that deadly force was reasonable where the plaintiff attacked a border patrol agent with a rock and stick