to establish the charged offense, it is necessary to . examine whether the proof actually presented at trial showed assault. See Jacob, 892 S.W.2d at 908. In making its case, the State relied heavily on appellant’s videotaped statement in which she blamed the murder on a third person named Chop. In the statement, appellant claimed she only wrestled with the complainant, hit him with her hands, and swung at him. These facts are sufficient to show appellant assaulted the complainant. See Bartholomew, 871 S.W.2d at 213 (finding speeding and racing were lesser-included offenses of reckless driving when the State relied on evidence of speeding and racing to establish offense of reckless driving); see also Letson v. State, 805 S.W.2d 801, 806-07 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, under the facts of this case,
holding kicking that caused pain sufficient to establish assault holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction holding that where evidence was sufficient for attempted murder it was necessarily sufficient for aggravated assault which is a lesser included offense holding that consent is not a defense to the charge of second degree assault where the assault occurred in the context of a prison fight between inmates holding that evidence was sufficient to establish aggravated assault where appellant was seen pointing and firing a gun at two women