walked toward the abandoned SUV, not along the gravel trail. (Docket No. 370 at p. 79.) Officer Vega observed no other individual or human activity. Id. Officer Vega knew that the Eduardoño-type vessel had approached the protected cove approximately 500 feet away and had at least three occupants, and that a fourth suspect drove the SUV. (Docket No. 370 a p. 75.), The PRPD helicopter had informed Officer Vega that the three occupants of the vessel fled towards the shore and remained at large. (Docket No. 369 at pp. 84-85.) Officer Vega instructed defendant Mercedes to stop, placed defendant Mercedes on the ground and conducted a security, frisk. (Docket No. 388 at p. 17.) These actions constitute a Terry stop, not an arrest. See United States v. Taylor, 162 F.3d 12 (1st Cir. 1998) (<HOLDING>). The facts known to the arresting officers
holding that although officers observation and stop of the defendants vehicle occurred outside of the officers geographical jurisdiction the officer still had jurisdiction where the officer was requested by a state trooper to stop the suspects vehicle holding that long authorizes protective search of vehicle for weapons during terry stop even when suspect is outside vehicle and effectively under police control holding that a seventyfive minute terry stop was reasonable holding that officers action of putting suspects on the ground and searching for weapons was within the scope of a terry stop holding that threehour stop of terrorism suspects far exceeded the bounds of terry