judgment must do more than simply show there is some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). “In the language of the Rule, the nonmoving party must come forward with ‘specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.’ ” Id. at 587, 106 S.Ct. 1348 (quoting FED. R. CIV. P. 56(e)) (emphasis in Matsushita ). Finally, the court reminds the parties that summary judgment is not a “disfavored procedural shortcut.” Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 327, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). It is an important procedural vehicle “designed to secure the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of every action.” Id. One of S.W.2d 773, 777-78 (Ky.App.1943) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiffs cite one case involving a lessor’s
holding a gas storage and oil lease providing for free gas for domestic use at the principal dwelling house on said lands and for low cost gas for domestic use on said lands in the event of storage limited the lessor to low cost gas at one principal dwelling holding the lessee in providing free gas to the lessor owed the lessor the same duty of care as a regulated public utility would owe its customers despite express lease language placing the risk of using the gas on the lessor holding plaintiffs were properly enjoined from using excessive amounts of gas not contemplated by the free gas clause in the lease holding that injury caused by criminal fleeing after stealing gas from gas station was not foreseeable result of stations policy of not requiring customers to prepay for gas holding provision in oil and gas lease authorizing lessor to use gas for agricultural purposes contained no geographical limitations