rivers in Montana. Mason swore that a true copy of this study was attached to his affidavit. The River Study is clearly admissible under M. R. Evid. 803(8) or 902(4). The Mason affidavit references three other documents as well: (1) an Army Corps report on the navigability of the Clark Fork River prepared in or around 1975; (2) an Army Corps navigation study of the Madison River completed in 1974; and (3) another Army Corps study of the Missouri completed in 1974. Mason avers that true copies of each of these documents are attached to his affidavit. Mason’s affidavit established that these studies and reports were pulled from the records kept by the DNRC used in pursuance of its official duties. These records are undoubtedly admissible under M. R. Evid. 803(8). Mont. Petroleum, ¶ 80 (<HOLDING>). The Mason affidavit and exhibits were
holding that an automobiles title history was admissible under the public records exception holding that municipal court records were admissible under  official records or public documents  exception holding that the portion of the medical records containing the victims statements to the emergency room nurse that she had been raped by her husband were admissible under the records of regularly conducted business activity exception to the hearsay rule holding that gun shop records kept pursuant to government requirements are admissible business records holding that data pulled from records regularly kept by the montana department of environmental quality was admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule