of his probation in another case. Id. at 3. We recognize the general principles of res judicata and law of the case, particularly as they pertain to post-convietion proceedings. As a general rule, when this court decides an issue on direct appeal, the doctrine of res judicata applies, thereby precluding its review in post-conviction proceedings. Ben-Yisrayl v. State, 738 N.E.2d 253, 258 (Ind.2000). The doe-trine of res judicata prevents the repetitious litigation of that which is essentially the same dispute. Id. The "law of the case" doctrine mandates that when an appellate court decides a legal issue, both the trial court and the court on appeal are bound by that determination in any subsequent appeal involving the same case and relevantly similar facts 213 (Ind.Ct.App.1984) (<HOLDING>). Unfortunately, the plea agreement and
holding that counsels failure to advise the defendant of the collateral consequences of a guilty plea cannot rise to the level of constitutionally ineffective assistance holding that defendants guilty plea could not be said to have been entered with full knowledge of the consequences of such a plea when the trial court clearly did not advise him that his prior convictions could influence either the decision to impose the maximum oneyear penalty on each count or the decision to order the terms to be served consecutively holding that a defendant must have knowledge of the likely consequences of entering the guilty plea in order for a plea to be voluntary and knowing holding that an attorney is required to advise a defendant of the direct consequences of a plea and will not be found ineffective for failing to advise of collateral consequences of the plea holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea