is an impermissible intrusion onto tribal rights. Williams, 358 U.S. at 223; see also American Indian Law Deskbook, 118, 138-39 (Nicholas J. Spaeth et al. eds. 1993). Furthermore, it is undisputed that the Washoe Tribe has enacted a broad regulatory scheme in which the Tribe has expressly reserved jurisdiction over civil actions against its members arising on its lands. Washoe Tribe of Nevada and California Law and Order Code. Tribal jurisdiction extends to all tribally held lands as defined in the Tribe’s Constitution. In addition, the Tribal Court has reserved to itself subject matter jurisdiction over all civil causes of action, and personal jurisdiction over any person served within the territorial jurisdiction of the Tribe. Furthermore, it is undisputed th 3 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977) (<HOLDING>)). For the state court to assert its
holding federal government could not prosecute an american indian who on indian territory had murdered another member of his tribe as federal statute excluded such crime from federal criminal jurisdiction in favor of allowing the indians to engage in selfgovernment ie the regulation by themselves of their own domestic affairs the maintenance of order and peace among their own members by the administration of their own laws and customs holding that indian tribes lack tribal jurisdiction over crimes committed by nonmember indians within the tribes reservation holding that arizona could not impose an income tax on reservation indians holding that the admissibility of expert testimony was governed by state law holding that assumption of jurisdiction by the state court would infringe upon the right of reservation indians to make their own laws and be governed by them