Committee to consider formulating a rule governing the length of original writ petitions. Id. at 519 n. 1. In response to the Court’s request, the committee proposes amendments to rule 9.100(g), (j), and (k), which limit the length of petitions and responses to fifty pages and the length of replies to fifteen pages. The proposed amendments were published for comments. Only one comment was received, which supports page limitations but suggests that the rule be amended to specifically provide for longer filings upon a showing of good cause. The rules committee considered the need for a provision specifically allowing the court to permit longer filings, but a majority believed that such authority is inherent and need not be specifically stated in the rule. See Basse, 740 So.2d at 520 (<HOLDING>). After reviewing the proposed amendments and
holding filing of motion for reconsideration does not toll the 30day deadline for filing petition for review holding that claimant must show good cause for failure to submit evidence to alj and appeals council recognizing petitioners must be afforded the opportunity to show good cause for filing a longer petition holding that utility customers mailing of a petition did not constitute the filing of the petition as filing was not effectuated until the petition was received by the clerk holding that pleading captioned petition for rule to show cause implies that proceedings will be civil because a criminal defendant can never be compelled to show cause