summary judgment motion, plaintiff has failed to meet its burden to submit or cite materials in the record showing the existence of a genuine issue of material fact. B. Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing Perhaps sensing the futility of sticking to his original claim, plaintiff devotes most of his opposition brief to setting forth a new claim for a breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. It is unclear what precisely plaintiff is alleging, but in any event this “claim” is not properly before the court. A plaintiff cannot keep his ease alive through bait-and-switch, luring the defendant into moving for summary judgment on one claim, only then to assert an entirely different claim. See Crawford v. United States, 179 Ct.Cl. 128, 376 F.2d 266, 276 (1967) (<HOLDING>); cf. Redland Co., Inc. v. United States, 97
holding that a claim not pleaded in the petition ie the complaint was not properly before the court on a motion for summary judgment holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion holding that claims raised for the first time in an opposition to a motion for summary judgment are not properly before a court holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed