the Court wrote the following concerning the privacy interest persons have in their tax returns: "The protection of privacy is of fundamental-indeed, of constitutional-importance. Subjecting federal income tax returns of our citizens to discovery is sustainable only because the pursuit of justice between litigants outweighs protection of their privacy. But sacrifice of the latter should be kept to the minimum.... ” 362 S.W.2d at 301. 7 . Fla.Stat.Aim. ch. 768.76 (Harrison Supp.1991); Idaho Code § 6-1604 (1990 & Supp.1992); Ill. Ann.Stat. ch. 110, ¶ 2-604.1 (Smith-Hurd Supp. 1992); Iowa Code Ann. § 668A.1(3) (West 1987); Minn.St.Ann. § 549.191 (West 1988 & Supp. 1992); Mont.Code Ann. § 27-1-221 (1993); Ark. R-Civ.P. 26(b)(1); Curtis v. Partain, 272 Ark. 400, 614 S.W.2d 671 (1981) (<HOLDING>); Leidholt v. District Court in and for City
holding a sentence is not limited to period of incarceration holding limited in lupo v lineberger 313 ark 315 317 855 sw2d 293 294 1993 holding limited by hammon v state 347 ark 267 66 sw3d 853 2002 holding that provisions in a subcontract incorporating a prime contract for a limited purpose are limited only to those that are applicable holding a writ was appropriate when the authorization was not limited as to time and not limited to specific healthcare providers