59 . See W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., LLC v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, 549 F.3d 100, 106-07 (2d Cir.2008). 60 . See Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 358 n. 6, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996) (plaintiffs with one type of injuiy lack standing to challenge a different, though perhaps related, injury, because “standing is not dispensed in gross”). 61 . In re Salomon Analyst Level 3 Litig., 350 F.Supp.2d 477, 496 (S.D.N.Y.2004). Accord Griffin v. Dugger, 823 F.2d 1476, 1483 (11th Cir.1987) ("a claim cannot be asserted on behalf of a class unless at least one named plaintiff has suffered the injury that gives rise to that claim”); In re Global Crossing, Ltd. Sec. Litig., 313 F.Supp.2d 189, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) (same). 62 . See, e.g., Hoffman v. UBS-AG, 591 F.Supp.2d 522, 531 (S.D.N.Y.2008) (<HOLDING>) (citing Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Dmg Stores,
holding that plaintiffs lacked standing because the case was not ripe for adjudication holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue holding that the rico bar applies even where the plaintiff does not have standing to bring a securities fraud action holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to bring securities claims relating to funds that plaintiffs did not own holding that plaintiffs did not have standing to bring survival act suit because decedent left heirs at law but plaintiffs were not among them