between defendants. See United States v. Monsanto, 858 F.2d 160, 171-72 (C.A.4 1988). See also Faison v. Nationwide Mortg. Corp., 839 F.2d 680, 686 (C.A.D.C.1988). A bankruptcy trustee “may recover only once from multiple transferees in multilateral fraudulent conveyances,” but cannot recover the full amount from each defendant to receive duplicate recovery. HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank, 48 F.3d 623, 640 (C.A.2 1995) (citing Robert J. White, Leveraged Buyouts & Fraudulent Conveyance Law Under the Bankruptcy Code, 1991 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 357, 410-11 (1992)). Because there are multiple defendants, “any amount paid by anybody ... for and on account of any injury or damage, should be held for a credit on the total recovery in any action for the same injury or damages” to preven (C.A.4 2006) (<HOLDING>). The compensatory damages award sought is
holding that because there was no distinction between the damages caused by actions of defendants in a prior case and actions of the defendant in this case the plaintiff suffered a single indivisible injury allowing for one cause of action holding that the rule of splitting of causes of action as related to res judicata does not permit the owner of a single or entire cause of action or an entire indivisible demand to divide or split that cause of action and that all damages from a single wrongful act must be claimed in one action recognizing this distinction holding that a defendant supervisory official cannot be liable for an underlings actions unless there is proof that the defendant is personally responsible for the alleged unconstitutional actions that caused his injury holding that if state law provides multiple statutes of limitations for personal injury actions the general or residual statute for personal injury actions should be used for 1983 actions