selling alcohol and they were still playing cards in the dining room when the robbery occurred. Thus, there was sufficient evidence that appellants robbed individuals, but in their capacity as customers of a business. There was also evidence in the record from which a rational jury could conclude that the appellants targeted the assets of Jeanette’s business, not solely the customers. The appellants had a meeting the night before the robbery in which they learned about a house with “a lot of money in it.” JA 1430. During the robbery, they asked Jeanette where “the money” was and rummaged through her refrigerator. App. 1167-69. The nexus to interstate commerce in this case was, therefore, more direct than in Wang and the other cases cited by the appellants. See Walker, 657 F.3d at 181 (<HOLDING>). We recognize that this case stands at the
holding that the connection between the robbery and interstate commerce was much more direct than in wang because at the time of the robbery the victim in walker was selling illegal drugs that had traveled through interstate commerce recognizing scarborough holding that commerce nexus satisfied upon showing that possessed firearm had traveled at some time in interstate commerce holding that the feloninpossessionofafirearm statute only requires a showing that the firearm at one time traveled through interstate commerce holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce holding that robbery of proceeds intended for purchase of cocaine affected interstate commerce