does not provide for separate periods of limitations and repose. It extinguishes all causes of action as to which suit is not commenced within four years of the transfer and provides a carve-out for a limited class of claims brought later. Section 726.110(1) is a statute of repose in its entirety. B. Having concluded that section 726.110(1) is a statute of repose, we must consider whether it is nonetheless subject to F/R’s assertion of equitable estoppel based on its allegation that Mr. Levin concealed the fraudulent nature of the transfer, thereby delaying its commencement of suit. Based on the long-standing recognition that statutes of repose create an absolute bar to untimely actions and the specific language of section 726. nk & Trust Co. of Sarasota, 361 So.2d 156, 158 (Fla.1978) (<HOLDING>). Using equitable estoppel in this context
holding that the act provides the exclusive procedures and remedies for common law causes of action based on allegations of deception fraud and misrepresentation holding that equitable estoppel requires proof of fraud misrepresentation or affirmative deception recognizing fraud to be a known misrepresentation or a nondisclosure holding equitable estoppel in disciplinary proceeding requires inducement to change position recognizing equitable tolling of deadlines and numerical limits on motions to reopen or reconsider during periods when a petitioner is prevented from filing because of deception fraud or error as long as the petitioner acts with due diligence in discovering the deception fraud or error