in the absence of a demonstrated, compelling need.... There is no compelling need for an implied warranty when other adequate remedies are available to the consumer.... Rocky Mountain, 987 S.W.2d at 58. The court continued by explaining when remedies are not adequate: Remedies may not be adequate when, for example, privity or reliance requirements or the difficulty of assigning responsibility .prevent a wronged consumer from obtaining redress.... Cf Jacob E. Decker & Sons v. Capps, 139 Tex. 609, 164 S.W.2d 828, 833-34 (Tex.1942) (imposing common-law implied warranty that food products introduced into the chain of commerce are fit for human consumption). Rocky Mountain, 987 S.W.2d at 53. The court noted further that “[n]o such obstacles” were present in the case at bar. See id. (<HOLDING>). We have not located any published case
holding fifra preempts implied warranty claims holding that under virginia law an implied warranty claim was not actionable against the plaintiff because there was no privity holding that texas law does not recognize an implied warranty that services incidental to helicopter maintenance will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner holding that an implied warranty to perform services in a good and workmanlike manner is an action available under the dtpa and is subject to the twoyear limitations provided by the dtpa holding the implied warranty is implied in all residential leases in california