in the Sale Order Claims sold to the Plaintiff; and to allow such tactics would undermine this Court’s jurisdiction over the enforcement of its own order approving the sale of these claims to the Plaintiff. In sum, based on 28 U.S.C. § 2283, its power under § 105(a), and applicable case law applying these statutes, this Court, contrary to the Defendants’ assertion, does indeed have the authority to enjoin the Defendants from continuing to prosecute the State Court Suit as it relates to the Sale Order Claims that the Plaintiff purchased from the Trustee in the main bankruptcy case after this Court held an auction and approved the sale. See, e.g., Cent. W. Va. Energy Co. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., No. 06-3906, 245 Fed.Appx. 415, 2007 WL 1675004, at *11 (6th Cir. Jun. 11, 2007) (<HOLDING>). Not only will this injunction prevent the
holding that  524a may be enforced by the bankruptcy courts contempt power under  105a holding that a motion to enforce bankruptcy sale order is a core proceeding and citing 11 usc  105a as the section which gives the bankruptcy court the power and the jurisdiction to enforce its valid orders  recognizing bankruptcy courts have the jurisdiction and power under case law and 11 usc  105a to issue injunctions as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate or prevent the frustration of orders that they have previously issued holding a bankruptcy court is empowered to reopen a bankruptcy case on its own motion under 11 usc  105a holding that bankruptcy courts have inherent power and authority under 11 usc  105a to sua sponte reconsider modify or vacate orders previously entered