Hall County Jail, which is not a “public place” and, thus, cannot satisfy an essential element of the crime of affray. Decided July 6, 2011. Travis A. Williams, H. Bradford Morris, Jr., for appellant. Lee Darragh, District Attorney, John D. West, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. Accordingly, for all of the foregoing reasons, we reverse Single-tary’s conviction of misdemeanor affray and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing consistent with this opinion. Judgment reversed and case remanded for resentencing. Smith, P. J., and Mikell, J., concur. 1 See OCGA § 16-11-32 (“An affray is the fighting by two or more persons in some public place to the disturbance of the public tranquility.”). 2 See, e.g., English v. State, 301 Ga. App. 842, 842 (689 SE2d 310) (2010) (<HOLDING>). 3 Prior to trial, the State nolle prossed the
holding that when an appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction the relevant question is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt holding that on appeal a defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence and that the relevant question is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt footnote and punctuation omitted holding the standard of review in juvenile adjudication is whether after viewing evidence in light most favorable to the state any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt holding that when reviewing the sufficiency of evidence to support a state criminal conviction the relevant question under the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment is whether after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt holding that evidence is sufficient to support a conviction if viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements  beyond a reasonable doubt