534 U.S. 1129, 122 S.Ct. 1068, 151 L.Ed.2d 971 (Feb. 19, 2002). A constitutional error within the meaning of rule 44.2(a) is an error that directly offends the United States Constitution or the Texas Constitution, without regard to any statute or rule that might also apply. Shelton v. State, 41 S.W.3d 208, 218 (Tex.App.-Austin 2001, pet. ref'd); Alford v. State, 22 S.W.3d 669, 673 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2000, pet. ref'd); Tate v. State, 988 S.W.2d 887, 890 (Tex.App.-Austin 1999, pet. ref'd). That is, an error is constitutional only if the correct ruling was constitutionally required. See Alford, 22 S.W.3d at 673. We conclude that this error does not fit that definition. See Glauser, 66 S.W.3d at 316; cf. Peak v. State, 57 S.W.3d 14, 19 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Lee, 971 S.W.2d at 131-32 (same); cf. also
holding that harmlesserror analysis applies to coerced confessions recognizing that harmlesserror analysis applies to britt violations holding that the admission of evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search and seizure is subject to a harmlesserror analysis holding that harmlesserror analysis is inappropriate in reviewing the appointment of an interested prosecutor holding misstatement of law in closing argument requires 442b harmlesserror analysis