§ 1983 claims are final. However, the instant case is not a § 1983 claim, it is a Title VII case, under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. Congress’s intent was for a claimant to have a trial de novo notwithstanding the administrative determinations. The Elliott Court held that: The legislative history of the 1972 amendments reinforces the plain meaning of the statute, and confirms that Congress intended to accord federal employees the same right to a trial de novo [following administrative proceedings’] as is enjoyed by private-sector employees, and employees of state governments and political subdivisions under the amended Civil Rights Act of 1964. Elliott, 478 U.S. at 795-796, 106 S.Ct. 3220. See also Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U.S. 36, 44, 94 S.Ct. 1011, 39 L.Ed.2d 147 (1974) (<HOLDING>); Raniola v. Bratton, 243 F.3d 610, 623-624
holding that a title vii plaintiff could not hold coworkers liable in their individual capacities under title vii holding that  final responsibility for enforcement of title vii is vested with federal courts holding that there is no individual liability under title vii holding that relief granted under title vii is against the employer not individual employees whose actions constituted a violation of title vii emphasis in original holding that title vii provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment