services for the State. In stark contrast to the Wit-ham test results, the Med-Tox test indicated that Black's sample contained 528 milligrams of cocaine metabolites per milliliter-98 milligrams higher than Wit-ham's initial test conducted on the same sample. Based upon this evidence, the State moved to revoke Black's probation. Prior to the revocation hearing, Black filed a motion for the State to produce evidence it planned to use at his hearing. The State responded by stating that it did not possess the items requested and informed Black that this information could be obtained by contacting the JCPD: The revocation hearing took place on March 7, 2002. During the hearing, Black moved to strike all evidence due to the State's failure to provide t Ind.Ct.App.2002), trams. denied (<HOLDING>). However, judges are not required to admit all
holding that neither rule 11 nor the protections of boykin apply to probation revocation hearings and observing that less process is due in prison disciplinary proceedings than in probation revocation hearings holding uncertified investigation reports of law enforcement personnel inherently unreliable and inadmissible in revocation hearings holding hearsay admissible in revocation hearings holding that certified charging informations and police reports are deemed admissible in revocation hearings holding that the irs has a law enforcement purpose in the context of a criminal tax investigation