341 (Tex.Crim.App.2004). And the complaint made on appeal must comport with the complaint made in the trial court or the error is forfeited. Heidelberg v. State, 144 S.W.3d 535, 537 (Tex.Crim.App.2004); Vafaiyan v. State, 279 S.W.3d 374, 383 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2008, pet. ref'd). Although Lugo objected to the admission of portions of his statement and also objected that his statement was the product of police coercion, none of these objections comport with the complaint he now brings on appeal — that the trial court erred by allowing Reyes to testify about statements Lugo made to Reyes during interrogation. Because the complaint Lugo now makes on appeal does not comport with any complaint made to the trial court, he has forfeited this error, if any. See Heidelberg, 144 S.W.3d at 537 (<HOLDING>). We overrule Lugo’s second issue. IV.
holding that appellant failed to preserve error because it did not present appellate complaint to trial court holding that the complaint on appeal must comport with the trial objection holding that appellant did not preserve his complaint for review because the grounds raised on appeal did not comport with those urged to the trial court as justifying suppression holding objection to expert report made in trial court must comport with complaint asserted on appeal holding that defendant failed to preserve for appellate review complaint that prosecutors use of postarrest silence against defendant violated the texas constitution because complaint did not comport with defendants trial court objection based solely on the federal constitution