of the Church’s arguments and the trial court’s judgment. Discussion Forcible detainer cases are governed by Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 510. The only issue in a forcible detainer action is the right to actual possession. Rule 510.3 provides that the merits of title shall not be adjudicated. Tex. R. Civ. P. 510.3(e). Specifically, Rule 510.3 provides that, in a forcible detainer suit, [t]he court must■ adjudicate the right to actual possession and not title. Counter claims and the joinder of suits against third parties are not permitted in eviction cases. A claim that is not asserted because of this rule can be brought in a separate suit in a court of proper jurisdiction. Id. (emphasis added); U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass’n v. Freeney, 266 S.W.3d 623, 625 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Dormady v. Dinero Land & Cattle Co., 61
holding that a nonstatutory postponement  does not constitute an irregularity in the foreclosure proceeding itself that could justify setting aside a foreclosure sale holding that forcible detainer action is cumulative not exclusive of other remedies party may have so that parties may pursue both forcible detainer action in justice court and suit to quiet title in district court holding that defects in foreclosure process or in title may not be considered in forcible detainer action but may only be pursued in suits for wrongful foreclosure or to set aside substitute trustees deed holding that a failure to comply with the foreclosure statutes invalidates a foreclosure sale holding that debtors allegation that mortgage holder failed to provide him with the statutorily required notice of foreclosure was sufficient to state a claim for wrongful foreclosure