established that baseless random vehicle stops for the mere purpose of checking license and registration information are impermissible under both state and federal law. In summary, we find that under the facts of the present case the stop of the defendant’s automobile was reasonable and was based upon the good faith belief of the officer that the driver was driving without a license. Even though he soon realized upon stopping the vehicle that the driver was not who he had suspected, the officer was justified in making further inquiry. The decision of the trial court is reversed and this matter is remanded for further proceedings. SCOTT, P.J., and TIPTON, J., concur. 1 . Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 2 . See Hughes v. State, 588 S.W.2d 296 (Tenn.1979) (<HOLDING>), and Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 663, 99
holding that the stop of defendants vehicle was unlawful where officers stopped the vehicle to check the license and registration but had observed no suspicious activity holding a stop was effected where officers vehicle blocked defendants vehicle from proceeding holding that vehicle owner not present in the vehicle when it was stopped had not suffered interference with his possessory interest and could not challenge the constitutionality of the stop holding that officer had reasonable suspicion to stop a vehicle when confidential informant personally observed the vehicle provided a description of the vehicle and its direction detailed the basis for her suspicion that the vehicle was engaged in illegal activity and had previously given reliable information that led to the successful apprehension of individuals engaged in various criminal activity holding that officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a vehicle stop where official license and registration records reflected that the vehicle was registered to a driver with a revoked license