involved, see Austin v. Paramount Parks, Inc., 195 F.3d 715, 728-29 (4th Cir. 1999) (citing Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 480, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 1298, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986) (plurality opinion)), the two Airborne employees involved in the Mejias’ arrest and prosecution do not appear to have been final corporate policymakers in the area of cooperation with law enforcement. Bezmen was Airborne’s regional security manager for the greater New York area only, while Gennarelli was the “cartage supervisor” for the particular Airborne office through which the controlled pickup was conducted. Other courts have held that corporate employees in similar positions are not final policymakers for § 1983 purposes. See, e.g., Austin v. Paramount Parks, 195 F.3d 715, 729-30 (4th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. United States, 896 F.Supp. 1183,
holding that a single decision by a final policymaker within the area of his responsibility can impose liability on the responsible governmental entity holding that an individual can be a final policymaker either by operation of state and local positive law or by custom or usage having the force of law holding that theme parks manager of loss prevention was not a final policymaker holding that facility manager of particular halfway house run by private corporation was not final policymaker holding that state medical director of prison medical services corporation was not final policymaker