injury do not violate double jeopardy when both convictions arise out of a single transaction. Lott contends otherwise based on State v. Cooper, 634 So.2d 1074 (Fla.1994), where the Florida Supreme Court held that “[i]t is entirely appropriate to convict a person of both DUI manslaughter and driving while license is suspended, but it is inappropriate to enhance the degree of both crimes by using a single homicide.” Id. at 1074-75 (citing State v. Chapman, 625 So.2d 838 (Fla.1993), and Houser v. State, 474 So.2d 1193 (Fla.1985)). Lott wants to extend the reasoning from Cooper and Chapman, both of which involved a single homicide, to the instant case where a single serious injury occurred. In support of this analysis, he cites Kelly v. State, 987 So.2d 1237, 1239-40 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (<HOLDING>). The logic applied in Cooper, Chapman, and
holding that it was a double jeopardy violation to convict and sentence for both dui with serious bodily injury and driving without a valid license with serious bodily injury based on an injury to a single victim holding that life sentence imposed for kidnapping with bodily injury of 14yearold victim was not cruel and unusual punishment even though bodily injury was slight given circumstances attendant upon offense holding that specific intent is not element of assault resulting in serious bodily injury holding that the fatal injury to a murder victim may be considered as satisfying the bodily injury component of the capital felony of kidnapping with bodily injury holding dui causing serious bodily injury is not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16