Taken in context, with the proper meaning given to section 41-6-80, the omission of the last sentence from the jury instruction did not change the essential meaning of the statute. Therefore, there was no error. CONCLUSION 1 51 We affirm the trial court's refusal to allow Dalinda's mother to testify as to the amounts of the medical bills she incurred for Dalinda's care. In addition, we affirm the trial court's ruling regarding jury instructions. 1 52 Justice DURRANT and Justice WILKINS concur in Associate Chief Justice RUSSONS opinion. 1 . Rule 37 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure outlines sanctions and procedures in the event a party fails to cooperate in discovery. 2 . Rule 56 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure outlines the requirements and proc 526 S.E.2d 80, 82 (1999) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. Syd's, Inc., 598 NE.2d 1065, 1066
holding that statute provides medical bills are admissible as evidence of necessary fair and reasonable charges holding that state did not submit sufficient evidence to establish amount of restitution to victim for medical bills incurred when it did not introduce any medical bills holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that no foundation had established bills were caused by and were reasonable and necessary results of accident holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary holding that plaintiff could not recover medical bills that were discharged in bankruptcy