delivery, pursuant to the Harter Act, has been held simply to require the discharge of the goods “upon a fit and customary wharf.” Morse Electro Products Corp. v. S.S. Great Peace, 437 F.Supp. 474, 486 (D.N.J.1977); Allstate Insurance Co. v. Imparca Lines, 646 F.2d 166, 168 (5th Cir.1981). Therefore, although the terms of both COGSA and the Harter Act mandate that a carrier effectuate a “proper delivery,” oftentimes courts must look to the common law in order to determine what conduct actually consti 252, 1255-57 (5th Cir.1983) (opining that carrier properly delivered cargo when it delivered the goods to the “farthest point it could” within limitations of law, customs, and usage of the Nigerian port); Farrell Lines, Inc. v. Highlands Insurance Co., 532 F.Supp. 77, 79-80 (S.D.N.Y.) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 696 F.2d 28 (2d Cir.1982). This
holding that delivery of citation is proper when delivered to a party capable of receiving it holding that proper delivery occurred under harter act when the carrier relinquished custody and control of the goods to the national port authority of monrovia holding authority to control limits duty to control holding that pursuant to venezuelan port of destination carrier delivered goods from first shipment when it transferred it to authorized customs warehouse holding that a statement of conditional sale of goods can be filed with the state auditor before the delivery of goods where statute says the statement must be filed within ten days of delivery of goods