contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” and that “each allegation must be simple, concise, and direct.” FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(2), 8(d)(1). Rule 8 accentuates “the emphasis placed on clarity and brevity by the federal pleading rules” and a clear and succinct complaint is therefore expressly mandated. Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 669 (D.C.Cir.2004). The plaintiffs Complaints, which contain 592 and 740 enumerated counts, respectively, plainly do not meet this standard. Courts in this jurisdiction have recognized the importance of the Rule 8 standard, and complaints that lack the requisite short and plain statement of the claim have been frequently dismissed. See Karim-Panahi v. U.S. Congress, 105 Fed.Appx. 270, 271 (D.C.Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Ciralsky, 355 F.3d at 669 (finding that the
holding that district court properly dismissed claims in  2241 petition that had been decided in previous habeas action holding that district court properly dismissed a complaint containing a purported one thousand causes of action for failing to meet rule 8s requirements holding that plaintiff need only plead damages in rico cases sufficient to meet rule 8s requirements holding that class claims that fail to meet the requirements of rule 23 may be properly dismissed by granting a rule 12b6 motion recognizing that one of those conditions for a district judge to grant leave to amend the complaint may properly be that claims contained in the original complaint but not included in the amended complaint be considered dismissed with prejudice 