principal purposes of the summary judgment rule is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims or defenses, and the rule should be interpreted in a way that allows it to accomplish this purpose. Id. III. Conclusions of Law: Summary Judgment Motions Neither party disputes that OXY currently provides “free,” useable gas to the 300 or so plaintiffs that currently use house gas. Further, OXY does not dispute that it must continue to provide plaintiffs free gas for the duration of the leases. The dispute in this case is whether, based on the language of the leases, OXY must bear the cost of making the gas useable to the surface owners at the well or whether plaintiffs must bear that cost. Said another way, plaintiffs believe the “free gas clause” in their lease 177, 183 (1979) (<HOLDING>); Casebolt v. Ky. W.Va. Gas Co., 293 Ky. 178,
holding provision in oil and gas lease authorizing lessor to use gas for agricultural purposes contained no geographical limitations holding that injury caused by criminal fleeing after stealing gas from gas station was not foreseeable result of stations policy of not requiring customers to prepay for gas holding free gas clause under a unitized lease entitled lessors on adjoining quarter sections to take gas from the well without charge to heat their principal dwelling houses even though the well was located on another quarter section holding plaintiffs were properly enjoined from using excessive amounts of gas not contemplated by the free gas clause in the lease holding a gas storage and oil lease providing for free gas for domestic use at the principal dwelling house on said lands and for low cost gas for domestic use on said lands in the event of storage limited the lessor to low cost gas at one principal dwelling