Debtor to turnover those powers and rights as property of the estate and provide an accounting of the powers and rights he is bound to turnover. As discussed above, it is clear that a turnover action under § 542 may be used to effectuate the turnover of property of the estate and is a cause of action as a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(E). See In re Dean, 107 F.3d 579 (8th Cir.1997). As these claims are causes of actions unto themselves and nowhere in the Complaint has Plaintiff attempted to plead an avoidance action, the statute of limitations for the claims actually pled is what is at issue. Plaintiff may seek and obtain a declaratory judgment without bringing a separate claim that may exist. See, e.g., Allied Inv. Corp. v. Jasen, 354 Md. 547, 731 A.2d 957 (1999) (<HOLDING>). Debtor and Trustee agree that the declaratory
recognizing possibility that landlord had administrative claim for postpetition conversion of its property holding complaint was not based on a conversion claim but was a declaratory judgment action thus not governed by conversion statute of limitations holding that electronic records may be subject to a claim for conversion holding that a bankruptcy courts approval of sale did not bar a subsequent action for conversion because the matter under consideration was not actually litigated in the bankruptcy proceedings the action for conversion did not constitute an impermissible collateral attack on a federal judgment holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information