Parker Group, Inc., 168 F.3d 468, 476 (11th Cir.1999). “Once a defendant is found liable for the plaintiffs injury, the District Court has a great deal of discretion in deciding the level of damages to be awarded.” Id. (citing Stallworth v. Shuler, 777 F.2d 1431, 1435 (11th Cir.1985)). As a general rule, general compensatory damages, as opposed to special damages, need not be proven with a high degree of specificity. See Ferrill, 168 F.3d at 476. Compensatory 'damages “may be inferred from the circumstances as well as proved by the testimony.” Id. (quoting Gore v. Turner, 563 F.2d 159, 164 (5th Cir.1977)). A plaintiff may be compensated for intangible, psychological injuries as well as financial, property, or physical harms. See Marable v. Walker, 704 F.2d 1219, 1220-21 (11th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). In the case of emotional distress resulting
holding that conduct must be beyond the fraud which supported compensatory damages to award punitive damages holding that a title vii plaintiffs testimony that her employment discharge resulted in sleep loss smoking and weight loss was sufficient to support an award of 100000 in compensatory damages holding that plaintiffs testimony that he was depressed humiliated unable to sleep and suffered from headaches and nightmares was sufficient holding that plaintiffs own testimony that he was embarrassed and humiliated by defendants conduct was sufficient to support compensatory damages award holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees