charts, and diagrams during trial is well-established. See Markey v. State, 996 S.W.2d 226, 231 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (listing numerous cases). To be admissible, objects offered as demonstrative evidence must meet the tests of relevancy and materiality, as well as the limitations imposed by rule 403. See Goode § 401.5 at 128. In contrast to mere demonstrative evidence, which is admitted solely for purposes of illustration, the trial court may, in the exercise of its discretion, admit into evidence for all purposes either “real” evidence, for example, the actual objects involved in a case, or “reproduced real” evidence, for example, photographs, maps, or drawings that approximate the actual objects or places involved in a case. See id.; Markey, 996 S.W.2d at 231 (<HOLDING>). Appellant objected to the chart when it was
holding that trial court erred but harmlessly by admitting into evidence for all purposes chart summarizing officers testimony holding trial court erred in finding violations based only on officers testimony based on review of probation records where states failure to admit records into evidence rendered officers testimony hearsay holding that the trial court had erred by excluding the expert testimony of a doctor holding that the trial court erred by admitting a doctors testimony that a child victims description of a sexual crime was very believable holding that after review the minutes were unambiguous and the trial judge erred in admitting parol evidence