plan fiduciaries are obligated to continue to monitor the financial state of the plan and ensure that the investments are prudent. DiFelice v. U.S. Airways, Inc., 497 F.3d 410, 423 (4th Cir.2007). Though the Fourth Circuit has not yet reached the question of when recordkeeping fees become imprudent, case law from other jurisdictions indicates that recordkeeping fees can rise to a level to be adjudged imprudent. See, e.g., Tussey v. ABB, Inc., 746 F.3d 327, 335-37 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 477, 190 L.Ed.2d 358 (2014) (affirming the lower court’s findings that the plan’s fiduciaries were liable for them failure to monitor recordkeeping costs, despite the presence of revenue sharing offsets); George v. Kraft Foods Glob., Inc., 641 F.3d 786, 798-800 (7th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>); Wsol v. Fiduciary Mgmt. Assocs., Inc., 266
holding in part that the severity of a victims injuries may be sufficient evidence from which a trier of fact can conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that a victim has been knowingly killed holding that a reasonable trier of fact could find that the defendants acted with malice holding that the issue of defendants actual knowledge should not be resolved on summary judgment but should be left to the trier of fact holding that based upon the opinions of experts in the field that recordkeeping costs should have been less a trier of fact could reasonably conclude that defendants did not satisfy them duty to ensure that the recordkeepers fees were reasonable holding that on a review of the sufficiency of the evidence the court determines whether any rational trier of fact could have found all the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt