opinion. 2 . At the time of Chevalier’s and Barnhart’s wedding, the State of Ohio refused to solemnize their union. While this appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court held that state bans on same-sex marriage are unconstitutional. Obergefell v. Hodges, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015). 3 . In Lloyd, the Seventh Circuit noted that federal courts are not competent to handle divorce proceedings for the following reasons: The typical divorce decree provides for alimony payable in installments until the wife remarries, and if there are children it will provide for custody, visitation rights, and child support payments as well. These remedies — alimony, custody, visitation, and child support — often entail continuing judicial supervision of a vola (6th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). Admittedly, this court has not always been
holding that the domesticrelations exception barred federal adjudication of a statelaw fraud action because the plaintiff essentially sought a modification of the process in the divorce decree relating to distribution holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering temporary alimony that exceeded the husbands ability to pay holding that the domesticrelations exception prevented the plaintiff from challenging in federal court the constitutionality of the statecourt judges decision to consider certain assets and property when calculating the plaintiffs husbands income for the purposes of determining alimony payments because the plaintiff ultimately wanted this court to enjoin the state court from using property  to determine the amount of alimony owed holding that a 19day difference between the filings of the state court and federal court actions was immaterial given the absence of progress in the statecourt action and the substantial proceedings that had occurred in the federal court action holding that the family court is required to consider all relevant factors in determining alimony