and pain and dissapointments [sic] behind you. I know it won’t be easy, but in time the old hurts will fade and they will be replaced with new feelings of happiness you’ve always wanted and believed you could never have. This new beginning for you will give you the ability to be happy.... Together we will deal with your depressions — including teaching the kids about what happens to you. Together we will show the kids what a healthy relationship can be like. Together we will finally find the happiness both of us have wan ful act” exception to hold that statements made to a social worker indicating possible fraud were not privileged. New York v. O’Gorman, 91 Misc.2d 539, 398 N.Y.S.2d 336, 338 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1977). See Perry v. Fiumano, 61 A.D.2d 512, 403 N.Y.S.2d 382, 386 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.1978) (<HOLDING>). Following a review of the applicable law, and
holding that statements by a boyfriend to a social worker that he hit an abused mother as well as her child were not privileged holding the record does not show that the statement to the social worker was for medical treatment because the social worker testified that he questioned the child to determine whether he needed to notify child protective services of a case of suspected child abuse holding a social worker treating the child was permitted to testify to statements the child made about the abuse including the victims identification of the perpetrator because the statements were necessary to the treatment of ensuring the continued safety of the child holding that the worker was entitled to full ttd benefits because the employer never made an offer of employment once the worker was released to work holding that statements made to a social worker that may have bearing on a childs health safety and welfare are not privileged and are subject to compulsory disclosure under the harmful acts exception to social worker privilege