such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment or order for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (3) the judgment is irregular; (4) the judgment is void; or (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment remain in force. Unless otherwise stated, all rule references are to Missouri Court Rules (2004) and all statutory references are to RSMo 2000. 2 , Rule 74.05(d), which specifically relates to d 109, 111 (Mo.App.2002) (<HOLDING>); Gentry v. Gentry, 64 S.W.3d 344, 345
holding that a district court judgment is not a final judgment appealable by the defendant unless it includes the final adjudication and the final sentence holding that there is no final judgment where a memorandum is not denominated judgment or decree as required by rule 7401a holding that oral rendition of judgment supported by the courts docket sheet was insufficient express specific written order is required recognizing that a suit for declaratory judgment is neither legal nor equitable but is determined by the nature of underlying issue holding that although denommated a judgment where a docket sheet is neither signed nor initialed by judge there is no final judgment under rule 7401a