removal. We deny the petition for review. 1 . According to the government, Rumierz initially filed his habeas petition in Rhode Island, but the petition was transferred to the U.S. District Court in New Jersey. 2 . In Pickering's actual case, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the BIA's rule about vacated convictions, but reversed the BIA’s order of removal on the grounds that the government had not met its burden under the specific facts of that case. Pickering v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 525, 2006 WL 1976043 (6th Cir. July 17, 2006). The dicta in Pickering that the court would have come to the same result had the burden been on the defendant is immaterial, as the case is factually distinguishable from this case. 3 . The second argument has already been rejected by Herrera-Inirio, 208 F.3d at 307 (<HOLDING>). 4 . Ortiz-Herrera is also plainly
holding that a judgment of another states court is entitled to full faith and credit j when the judgment is considered final under the laws of the rendering state holding that a federal court must enforce a state court judgment under the full faith and credit statute where diversity jurisdiction exists holding this rule does not deny full faith and credit holding that constitutional error was waived even though petitioner repeatedly used the phrase full faith and credit because petitioner did not cite to the federal constitution or to any cases relying on the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution holding that federal definition of conviction under the immigration laws does not infract applicable principles of full faith and credit