its calculation method, which the government had proposed, from 18 U.S.C. § 1593 — the restitution provision in the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (“Trafficking Act”), Pub.L. No. 106-386, 114 Stat. 1464. Section 1593 directs that the district court’s calculation shall include the victim’s actual losses “and shall in addition include the greater of the gross income or value to the defendant of the victim’s services or labor or the value of the victim’s labor as guaranteed under the minimum wage and overtime guarantees of the Fair Labor Standards Act.” 18 U.S.C. § 1593(b)(3) (emphases added). In other words, the Trafficking Act mandates restitution that includes a defendant’s ill-gotten gains. Section 1593 applies, however, only to cases in which a defe 12 (3d Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Royal, 100 F.3d 1019, 1033
holding that where defendant objected in the district court only to the loss calculation and not specifically to the calculation of restitution the issue of restitution was not properly presented  to the district court holding that the victim and witness protection act limits the amount of restitution to the loss caused by the specific conduct forming the basis of the offense of conviction holding that the amount of restitution is limited to the victims actual losses  holding that a district court cannot order restitution in amounts that will result in the payment to the victim of an amount greater than the victims loss holding that measure of restitution is victims loss not defendants gain