Act is an equitable remedy and the award is determined by the court. George Basch Co. v. Blue Coral, Inc., 968 F.2d 1532, 1537 (2d Cir.1992) ("Clearly, the statute’s invocation of equitable principles as guideposts in the assessment of monetary relief vests the district court with some degree of discretion in shaping that relief.”); Id. at 1540 (“The district court’s discretion lies in assessing the relative importance of [listed] factors and determining whether, on the whole, the equities weigh in favor of an accounting.”). 301 . Anson Deposition at 244, 246-247. 302 . Expert Report of Bradford Cornell ("Cornell Report") at 18-23. 303 . Memorandum in Support of Dooney & Bourke, Inc.'s Motion in Limine to Exclude the Report, Testimony and Opinions of Mr. Weston Anson ( Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 312 . See Daniel L. Rubinfeld, Reference
holding age discrimination claim barred holding that witness statements in police report inadmissible holding that expert report is inadmissible because its inference of age discrimination solely on the basis of the raw numbers is impermissible in the absence of any attempt to account for other causes of the  anomaly holding that expert report was inadmissible in part because it assumed any anomalies in the  data must be caused by age discrimination and made no attempt to account for other possible causes holding that a department of defense report was inadmissible