“static status quo” into the municipal employee collective bargaining stat utes. See 26 M.R.S. § 964-A(2). In applying the holding of COLT, the Board has held that, if a collective bargaining agreement requires the employer to pay a certain percentage of the annual cost of a health insurance premium, the employer continues to be responsible for paying that percentage if the costs increase during negotiations following the expiration of the agreement. See Me. State Employees Ass’n v. Lewiston Sch. Dep’t, M.L.R.B. No. 09-05 at 3, 11-12 (Jan. 15, 2009). The static status quo is also maintained, as the Board held before our decision in COLT, when a government employer continues to pay the specific dollar amount for active employees’ health insurance set forth in an expi .2d 937, 942 (1995) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 20] If the parties had negotiated an
holding that any fact that increases a sentence beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to a jury holding that a large amount of drugs increases the likelihood of weapons holding that to maintain the status quo pay increases based on increased education unlike step increases must continue holding that any fact that increases mandatory minimum is element that must be proved beyond reasonable doubt holding any fact that increases the mandatory minimum is an element that must be submitted to the jury