however, to formulate its laws as it sees fit within the bounds of the Constitution. Under Chick Kam Choo, it is Louisiana’s prerogative to choose not to recognize the doctrine of f.n.c. in its own courts. It would be improper for this court to preclude plaintiffs from pursuing their claims in Louisiana state court based solely upon a prior federal court dismissal on f.n.c. grounds. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court, refusing to issue an injunction, is AFFIRMED. 1 . For actions filed on or after December 1, 1990, "ancillary jurisdiction” is included within what is now called "supplemental jurisdiction." See Royal Ins., 3 F.3d at 881 n. 2. 2 . See, e.g., Anthony, 617 F.2d at 1168-69 (dismissal for failure to prosecute); In re Reed, 861 F.2d 1381, 1382-83 (5th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); Dillard v. Security Pac. Brokers, Inc., 835
holding default was the appropriate remedy for failure to comply with numerous court orders and discovery requests holding that dismissal for failure to comply with discovery orders is on the merits holding that dismissal for failure to appear at a deposition is on the merits holding that under new york law a dismissal for failure to comply with discovery obligations is not a judgment on the merits and does not bar a subsequent suit involving the same parties and issues holding that with respect to discovery abuses prejudice from unreasonable delay is presumed  and failure to comply with court orders mandating discovery is sufficient prejudice