reach again into the toilet. Hodnett refilled the cup and threw its contents, hitting White on the side of his head. After the second cup of material hit White, Hodnett said, “Here’s some s— for you to eat, fat boy.” White could see pieces of toilet paper and fecal matter in the brownish liquid. Based on each act of throwing the toilet contents, Hodnett was charged with assault and battery on White. He argued before the trial court, and argues on appeal, that his two acts of throwing toilet contents on White were component parts of a single assault and battery. Noting that “[separate actions, separated by time are separate offenses,” the trial court held that each act constituted a separate offense and found Hodnett lso United States v. Farries, 328 F.Supp. 1034, 1039-40 (M.D.Pa.1971) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 459 F.2d 1057 (3d Cir.1972). Hodnett
holding unanimity requirement not violated when charge stated two separate counts with two separate and distinct offenses in each case holding that under the former rules congress envisioned two separate petitions filed to review two separate final orders holding that congress envisioned two separate petitions filed to review two separate final orders holding that two distinct acts of assault with a deadly weapon taking place within a fifteen minute period were a part of the same incident and they could not reasonably be held to constitute two separate offenses each complete in itself and each of which would require a separate charge holding that separate acts of hitting officer with object and kicking him constituted separate assaults distinguishing ladner v united states 358 us 169 79 sct 209 3 led2d 199 1958 in which the court held that wounding two officers with single act namely shotgun blast was only one offense under 18 usc  111