of the need satisfies the need element, then communication of pertinent information increases, not diminishes, the threat of liability to the officer as well as to the governmental entity. This is not a practice that should be encouraged. C. Recklessness In its brief, the County argues that, even if this Court holds there is insufficient - evidence of official immunity, the Court can still affirm the trial court’s summary judgment against Martinez based on section 101.055 of the Tort Claims Act. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 101.055 (West 2011). Because it affirms based on the element of good faith, the majority does not reach whether the trial court’s judgment could have been affirmed on this ground. See City of San Antonio v. Hartman, 201 S.W.3d 667, 671-72 (Tex. 2006) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. City of Baytown, 467 S.W.3d 566,
holding governmental immunity is no defense to contractual liability recognizing that under texas law governmental immunity embraces two principles immunity from liability and immunity from suit holding section 101065 is exception to waiver of governmental immunity recognizing a discretionary function exception to that waiver holding section 1010215 does not waive governmental immunity merely because a governmental action falls within the listed governmental functions thus further inquiry under the act is necessary