arrest or other detention.” 18 U.S.C. § 3501(c). It is worth noting here that in Dickerson, 530 U.S. 428, 120 S.Ct. 2326, the Supreme Court reversed the Fourth Circuit and held that § 3501 declined to overrule Miranda on the grounds that “Miranda announced a constitutional rule that Congress may not supersede legislatively.” Id. at 444, 86 S.Ct. 1602. 24 . See United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez, 511 U.S. 350, 355-56, 114 S.Ct. 1599, 128 L.Ed.2d 319 (1994) (recognizing the conflict between § 3501 and McNabb-Mallory, but stating that the Ninth Circuit has "concluded that the McNabb-Mallory rule, in either a pure or slightly modified form, applies to confessions made after the expiration of the safe harbor period” set out in § 3501); United States v. Pugh, 25 F.3d 669, 675 (8th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Christopher, 956 F.2d 536,
holding that  3501 overruled mcnabbmallory holding that lynch has been effectively overruled by subsequent cases holding that koon overruled prior circuit law to the contrary holding that schlitz was overruled to that extent holding that almendareztorres was not overruled by apprendi