the court will do the best it can with the guidance that the Seventh Circuit and the Supreme Court have made available. Reviewing that guidance requires a return to first principles. The Due Process Clause prohibits States from “depriving] -any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. Outside the context of certain government actions altogether prohibited by the substantive component of the Due Process Clause, see Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702, 720, 117 S.Ct. 2258, 138 L.Ed.2d 772 (1997) (collecting cases), “the deprivation by state action of a constitutionally protected interest in-‘life, liberty, or property is not in. itself unconstitutional; what is unconstitutional is the. deprivati 1401, 51 L.Ed.2d 711 (1977) (<HOLDING>); Mitchell v. W.T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600,
holding that student has no fundamental right to participate in high school athletics holding that a hearing is not required before a junior high school imposes corporal punishment on a student holding that schooladministered corporal punishment implicates fourteenth amendment due process rights holding high school which allowed student secular noncurricular activities to meet on school property was required to provide equal access to a christian student group holding drug testing high school student athletes was constitutional