Evidence of Contents The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if— (1) Originals Lost or Destroyed. All originals are lost or have been destroyed, unless the proponent lost or destroyed them in bad faith; or (2) Original Not Obtainable. No original can be obtained by any available judicial process or procedure; 7 . Dalton v. F.D.I.C., 987 F.2d 1216, 1223 (5th Cir.1993) (finding the defendant could use either an affidavit of a financial officer or use the bank's documentation to prove the account deficiency because the plaintiff could not "use the best evidence rule to force the [defendant] to produce the particular type of evidence of the loan that he would prefer”); United States v. Jackson, 451 F.2d 259, 261 (<HOLDING>) (citations omitted). See also Jack V.
holding that the trial court committed prejudicial error by failing to give a requested instruction on the probative value of fingerprint evidence where the state relied primarily on that evidence holding that the this rule is limited to cases where the contents of a writing are to be proved  and allowing testimony without fingerprint evidence being produced holding that as a general rule pleadings filed in this court are public records and are not subject to being sealed holding that trial court could take judicial notice of the contents of the court files to the extent it considered previous court orders evidence admissible under an exception to the hearsay rule and testimony and evidence admitted at any previous adjudicatory proceedings such as when the children were determined to be dependent recognizing this rule