Fed. R. Bankr.P. 4004(c)(1) ("on expiration of the time fixed for filing a complaint objecting to discharge and the time fixed for filing a motion to dismiss the case ... the court shall forthwith grant the discharge, unless ... (B) a complaint objecting to the discharge has been filed[.]") (emphasis added). 14 . 11 U.S.C. § 727(a), (c)(1); Fed. R. Bankr.P. 4004(b)-(c). 15 . Id. at 4005 ("At the trial on a complaint objecting to a discharge, the plaintiff has the burden of proving the objection.”); Gullickson v. Brown (In re Brown), 108 F.3d 1290, 1292-93 (10th Cir.1997) (preponderance of the evidence standard applies); The First Nat’l Bank v. Serafini (In re Serafini), 938 F.2d 1156, 1157 (10th Cir.1991) (same); of. Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991) (<HOLDING>). 16 . 11 U.S.C. § 727(b); see id. at § 524. 17
holding that the standard of proof for the dischargeability exceptions in 11 usc  523a is the preponderance of the evidence standard holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability exceptions under section 523a is preponderance of the evidence holding that the party challenging the dischargeability of a debt bears the burden of proving the debt nondischargeable by a preponderance of the evidence holding that a creditor objecting to the dischargeability of a debt under  523a must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence holding all exceptions to discharge under  523a must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence