the capital to continue their growth and profitability. I want to say I had one conversation via telephone with Greg [Lee] and received general assurances from Greg that Nexity was doing well. Verbally at the meeting that I had with David [Long] and Greg on May 30th, I again got verbal updates on Nexity that Nexity was doing fine and things were progressing as per their plans. But I did not receive anything in writing. “Q: Now, when you say Nexity was progressing as per their plans, do you mean the plans as outlined in the offering memorandum? “A: No. As per their general strategic plan that they had within the bank is what I understood them to say. “Q: In what respect, if any, was that different than what was said about the plans in the offering memorandum? 2d 987, 992-93 (Ala.2003)(<HOLDING>); Ex parte Caver, 742 So.2d 168, 173
holding that party could not justifiably rely upon oral representations thatwere directly contradicted by terms of written agreement holding that plaintiff could not have reasonably relied on an oral representation that the atwill provision of his employment contract did not apply to him when he entered into the contract that expressly contradicted the oral representations holding that a person could not reasonably rely on oral representations that contradict a written document holding that it is unreasonable for plaintiffs to rely on oral representations made before a contract when the contract contained a clause which expressed holding that enforcement of alleged oral representations made prior to execution of written contract was barred by the parol evidence rule and the explicit integration clause