only knowing or intentional child abuse, it cannot punish or define felony child neglect within the meaning of the IMCA. “The law used to define an offense under the Major Crimes Act must contain all descriptors Congress used to label the crime,” a standard which is not met here. United States v. Other Medicine, 596 F.3d at 681. It is arguable that 18 U.S.C. § 1111 could define and punish felony child abuse resulting in death, as opposed to felony child neglect, but that issue is not before the Court. Furthermore, 18 U.S.C. § 1111 already serves as one of the enumerated crimes under the IMCA, specifically murder. 18 U.S.C. § 1153(a). One federal offense should not normally serve as two separate enumerated crimes under the IMCA. See United States v. Other Medicine, 596 F.3d at 680-81 (<HOLDING>). A court should strive to give every term in a
recognizing that 18 usc  113a5 could not serve as more than one enumerated crime under the imca specifically both an assault against an individual who has not attained the age of 16 years and felony child abuse or neglect holding that the categorical approach applies to the identical definition of crime of violence in 18 usc  16 holding that a conviction for simple assault under pennsylvania law does not qualify under 18 usc  16b by way of 11 usc  1101a43 as an aggravated felony holding that sexual assault of a child qualified as crime of violence under 18 usc  16 holding dui causing serious bodily injury is not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16