a person has been convicted of possessing controlled dangerous substances and yet we cannot gauge whether he even knew the contraband was in the basement and controlled or exercised dominion over the CDS. We also conclude that based on the evidence in this record, no reasonable inference could be drawn that Moye was participating with others in the mutual enjoyment of the contraband. There is no evidence concerning whether Moye [or the other occupants] were observed using drugs on the night in question. Although the facts may lead a trier of fact to believe that sememe may have been using marijuana in the ... home, the evidence fails to establish who may have been using it, and when such use may have taken place. (Emphasis in original.) See also White, 363 Md. at 166-67, 767 A.2d 855 (<HOLDING>); Taylor, 346 Md. at 459, 697 A.2d 462 (finding
holding the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the lessee driver of a vehicle had knowingly transported a handgun recovered from the trunk of the vehicle in question holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the defendant a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by three individuals was in constructive possession of marijuana found in white bag directly under the defendants seat holding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that the juvenile a front seat passenger of a vehicle occupied by four persons was in possession of marijuana recovered from a crumpled piece of newspaper behind the drivers seat holding the evidence insufficient to support a finding that the defendant a front seat passenger in a car owned by the driver possessed cocaine recovered from inside a box of pots and pans in the trunk of the vehicle holding that the arresting officer lacked probable cause to arrest defendant a rear seat passenger of a car for possession of marijuana based on the discovery of two marijuana seeds in the front of the vehicle