Id. Here, the applicable statute, Ind.Code § 35-42-2-1, is similar to the applicable statute in Francis, and provides, in pertinent part: A person who knowingly or intentionally touches another person in a rude, insolent, or angry manner commits battery ... a Class A felony if it results in the death of a person less than fourteen (14) years of age and is committed by a person at least eighteen (18) years of age. In Francis, the Indiana Supreme Court assigned weight in the low to medium range for the aggravating cireumstance of the young age of the victim but did not require such a weight. We conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by assigning the aggravating factor of Blake's age significant weight. See, e.g., Warlick v. State, 722 N.E.2d 809, 813-814 (Ind.2000) (<HOLDING>). B. In Need of Correctional or Rehabilitative
holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it gave aggravating factors considerable weight holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling based only on affidavits holding that trial court retains wide discretion to apply or reject mitigating and aggravating factors as well as to interpret meaning of individual factors and its determination must be upheld absent abuse of discretion holding that the relative weight or value assignable to aggravating and mitigating factors properly found is not subject to review for abuse of discretion holding that a trial courts weighing of mitigating and aggravating factors will not be disturbed absent a showing that the trial court abused its discretion