this definition of a “judgment.” See id. The use of the phrase, “ORDERED that judgment shall enter as follows,” found in the Order does not imply that a further document will be entered, but that the brief, un-cited list following the phrase constitutes the judgment of the court. The Advisory Committee’s Note to Rule 58 explains the required elements of a “separate document” as one that “recites the terms of the judgment without offering additional explanations or citation of authority” and cites Forms 31 and 32 as examples. Advisory Committee’s Note to Rule 58. The Order entered accomplishes this purpose. It mirrors the Forms cited as sufficient examples. (See R. at 256.) Additionally, it is separate from the Memorandum of Opinion. See id.; Smith Corset Shops, Inc., 696 F.2d at 975 (<HOLDING>). If not entered as the judgment of the court,
holding the separate document rule violated when the alleged judgment was included with the memorandum and order of the court holding that an order dismissing the case did not satisfy rule 58s separate document requirement because the order was never entered as a separate document holding that a threepage memorandum opinion  order containing the district courts reasoning and case citations failed to comply with the separate document requirement holding that in connection with a motion to dismiss the court may consider a document not attached to the pleadings where the plaintiffs claim depends on the contents of a document the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the document even though the plaintiff does not explicitly allege the contents of that document in the complaint holding that a memorandum given to the employees supervisors was protected speech when the memorandum alleged criminal wrongdo ing