in part, from the following: 1) Alford’s recommendation to the NAC concerning Reverend Greer after it was alleged that Reverend Greer was plagiarizing sermons; 2) the meeting of Alford and two others with Reverend Greer to confront Reverend Greer about the accusations of plagiarism; 3) the decision of the executive committee of the NAC (“the Cabinet”) that Reverend Greer should undergo psychological testing; 4) the Cabinet’s approval of a letter of repri mand, contingent on Reverend Greer’s meeting certain requirements set by the Cabinet; and 5) Alford’s response to Reverend Greer’s January 9, 2013, e-mail. Thus, as in Ex parte Bole, the plaintiffs’ claims would require an inquiry into the investigation of Reverend Greer, into the results of that investigation, into the fact pp.1995) (<HOLDING>); Nebraska: Schieffer v. Catholic Archdiocese
holding that illicit sexual pursuits of priest were not related to duties of priest and did not further any interests of the employer church holding that first amendment barred negligent hiring and supervision claim against archdiocese for alleged sexual abuse of minor by priest holding that first amendment barred negligent supervision claim against a church regarding sexual relationship between adult parishioner and priest during the course of a marital counseling holding that first amendment barred child victim of sexual abuse by priest from bringing breach of fiduciary duty claim against priest church official and church holding that first amendment barred child victim of sexual abuse by priest from bringing negligent hiring and supervision claims but that first amendment would not be violated by adjudication of claim of intentional failure to supervise priest