proposition that federal RICO claims are not preempted by the federal labor law duty of fair representation. Landry did not expressly discuss the preemption issue, and this Court, therefore, does not find it as persuasive as other cases that address the preemption issue directly. However, to the extent that Landry may implicitly allow federal RICO claims that are predicated upon misrepre.sentations to exist independently of duty of fair representation claims, this Court disagrees with such dictum. In Dunn, this Court held, consistently with the overwhelming weight of authority, that all claims "based on the Defendants' alleged misrepresentations — whether cast as claims for fraud or otherwise — are precluded by [the federal labor law duty of fair representation].” 836 F.Supp. at 1580 (<HOLDING>); see also Nellis, 15 F.3d 50, 51 (holding that
holding rla duty of fair representation claim preempts identical state law claims of fraud and deceit holding the state law claims were not preempted holding that state law claim regarding breach of settlement agreement was preempted by federal labor law holding that state law fraud claims are preempted by the federal labor law duty of fair representation holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law