her, ya know, to the front.” 10 . We note, however, that the trial court addressed the particularized guarantees of trustworthiness at length and found that there was ample evidence of reliability to support admission of these statements. We agree with this finding. 11 . SDCL 16-13-10.2 provides: "No citizen shall be excluded from service as a grand or petit juror in the courts of this state on account of race, color, religion, sex, national origin or economic status.” 12 . The venue for Aesoph's trial was changed from Hyde County to Lyman County. Therefore, the sheriff that investigated the crime, Volek, was not the same sheriff that contacted the additional jurors. Thus, there is no potential for a claim of conflict of interest. See O'Neal v. Delo, 44 F.3d 655, 662-63 (8thCir.1995) (<HOLDING>). 13 . It is worth noting that tribal members
holding that conspiracy to commit murder is not lesserincluded offense of firstdegree murder holding that trial court abused its discretion in failing to make a proper inquiry of jurors andor failing to strike jurors for cause after jurors explicitly expressed bias holding that murder guideline is appropriate when death results from arson but not reaching issue of whether first or second degree murder guideline is appropriate because the district court although initially applying the guidelines for first degree murder had departed downward pursuant to application note 1 to ussg  2a11 on the ground that the death was not caused intentionally or knowingly holding statute stating that judge could excuse jurors was violated when jury commissioners excused jurors holding when sheriff or staff were not participants in murder investigation contacting additional jurors is appropriate