in Texas. We have held that “willful disobedience [of] a single court order may alone justify disbarment.” In re Daly, 291 Minn. 488, 495, 189 N.W.2d 176, 181 (1971) (disbarring an attorney for, among other things, continuing to file lawsuits after a federal court had issued an order prohibiting him from relitigating a particular issue and willfully defying an order from this court forbidding him from engaging in further proceedings in a case before a justice of the peace); see also In re Grzybek, 567 N.W.2d 259, 265 (Minn.1997) (stating that the attorney’s “behavior provided us with at least three separate grounds upon which he could be disbarred,” including “his repeated failure to comply with court orders” (emphasis added)); In re Joyce, 242 Minn. 427, 431, 65 N.W.2d 581, 583 (1954) (<HOLDING>). We also have considered an attorney’s failure
holding that an attorney was subject to disbarment based on his willful disobedience of a probate court order requiring him to return excess attorney fees paid to the executor of an estate holding because an award of attorney fees is discretionary court may consider attorney fees in relation to the underlying equities in the case holding attorney lacked standing to challenge amount of attorney fees awarded plaintiffs not parties to the appeal recognizing that an appeal filed within 30 days of the entry of an order awarding attorney fees was timely filed as to the issue of attorney fees holding that disbarment was the appropriate sanction where an attorney misappropriated funds from his real estate partners