So.2d 1035 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (<HOLDING>); Blankenship v. Interim Servs., Inc., 700
holding that the actual amount of capital employed in the state by a foreign corporation was to be based on the property of the corporation that was within the state and that was used in business transacted within the state holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation holding that that foreign corporation that acted as agent for retail customers within the united kingdom had insufficient contacts with florida to permit the trial court to exercise personal jurisdiction over the corporation holding that a corporation could be served by delivering a copy of the subpoena to an officer or managing or general agent of the corporation and that the agent could be an individual a partnership or another corporation holding that the plaintiff must demonstrate that defendants contacts with the united states as a whole support the exercise of jurisdiction consistent with the constitution and laws of the united states