This inquiry need not be conducted sequentially. Id. at 239-40, 129 S.Ct. 808. Inmates have no unfettered constitutional right to visitation free of regulation. Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, 612 F.2d 754, 758 (3d Cir.1979) (prison officials may limit the nature of inmate visitation). Moreover, Rieco has not demonstrated that he has any affirmative right to have TG’s caregivers bring TG to Rieco for visitation in prison, nor to have Rieco’s correspondence delivered to TG. Finally, Hebe is also entitled to qualified immunity because as a private attorney who represented state actors in their performance of official duties that grant them .qualified immunity, he is also entitled to such immunity. See Filarsky v. Delia, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1657, 1667, 182 L.Ed.2d 662 (2012) (<HOLDING>). As this appeal presents no substantial
holding that because a city inspector was not entitled to official immunity the city was not entitled to vicarious official immunity holding that attorney who was retained by city to assist in conducting official investigation into firefighters potential wrongdoing was entitled to qualified immunity in firefighters  1983 claim because official investigation of state employee was activity of the type entitled to qualified immunity holding that defendants are not entitled to qualified immunity holding that if official has violated clearly established law he is entitled to qualified immunity only if reasonable official could have believed conduct was lawful holding that qualified immunity is an affirmative defense that must be pled by the official who claims it