that he needed enough forms to get him through his probation period. She looked up his record and gave him what he thought was the correct number of forms to mail in for the remainder of his sentence. He diligently mailed in the forms until he had no more and then assumed that he was finished with probation. He left the state for eight and a half years, only returning when he discovered that there was a warrant out for his arrest. Illness, including mental illness, can render a technical violation of probation “not substantial or willful because a mental or physical illness can be debilitating to the point that a probationer cannot comply with the terms of probation.” Meade v. State, 799 So.2d 430, 432 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). See Williams v. State, 728 So.2d 287, 288 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>); Copeland v. State, 864 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st
holding that expert reports were not required to mention the defendant hospital because reports were based upon the actions of hospital physicians holding that intentional failure to file an information return is not a willful filing recognizing the debtorinpossessions duty to file records and operating reports holding that williams failure to file reports and submit to urinalysis testing were not willful because he was crippled by severe depression holding that court was within its discretion to refuse to consider reports that did not meet the supreme courts standards for admitting reports into evidence