delivery of the parcel. Once the beeper alerted, indicating that the package had been opened, Honolulu police officers executed the search warrant, recovered the parcel, and arrested Hernandez. After Hernandez was advised of her Miranda rights, she signed a statement of rights and waiver form. Prior to signing the waiver form, Hernandez wrote, “I think I want to answer questions at this time with out [sic] a lawyer.” She then provided a statement implicating herself and her co-defendants as being involved in a conspiracy to possess crystal methamphetamine with intent to distribute it. After her statement was typed, Hernandez reviewed it, and initialed the beginning and end of each paragraph. On May 31, 2000, Hernandez filed a motion to suppress the c S.Ct. 2395, 65 L.Ed.2d 410 (1980) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Gill, 280 F.3d 923, 929 (9th
holding that an fbi agents investigation of the written contents of a notebook that was lawfully in the possession of the fbi constituted a search that violated the defendants fourth amendment rights holding that the sca violates the fourth amendment to the extent that it allows government agents to obtain the contents of emails without a warrant holding that insurance investigators were not agents of the government for fourth amendment purposes because they had an independent reason to investigate the scene holding that even though federal agents obtained mailed packages of videos lawfully they nevertheless violated the fourth amendment when they viewed the videos without a warrant recognizing cause of action for damages against federal agents acting under their authority who allegedly violated plaintiffs fourth amendment rights