showing that a defendant knew or had reason to know of specific instances of actual infringement. b. Analysis The evidence adduced at trial demonstrates eBay had general knoivledge of infringement by sellers using its website. Such general knowledge, however, does not require eBay to take action to discontinue supplying its service to all those who might be engaged in counterfeiting. Having concluded that, as a matter of law, general knowledge of infringement is insufficient, the Court proceeds to consider whether the generalized assertions of infringement made by Tiffany are sufficiently specific to impute to eBay k ., 180 F.Supp.2d 678, 690-91 (D.Md.2001) (finding that demand letter notifying defendant of plaintiffs position is insufficient); Lockheed Martin Corp., 985 F.Supp. at 964 (<HOLDING>); Coca-Cola, 64 F.Supp. at 987 (holding general
holding that trademark owners mere assertion that its domain name is infringed is insufficient to impute knowledge of infringement and a demand letter is also insufficient holding that contributory trademark infringement requires some predicate act of infringement holding that although the underlying action is one for trademark infringement the infringement occurred as a result of the underlying defendants use of the trademark in their advertising holding that trademark owners demand letter is insufficient to resolve  uncertainty of infringement holding that the continued use of licensed trademark after termination of franchise agreement constituted trademark infringement and breach of contract