broad concept of determination prior to provision of a map would allow for the system to flexibly select a region or a user to select such a region. Necessarily a region must be determined before a map is provided. This would be true even if the term “predetermined” were ignored. This is not the broad meaning to be given the term “predetermined region” in this context. CI-VIX chose to limit the region to a “predetermined” region and I cannot read this limitation out of the claims. See Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp., 93 F.3d 1572, 1583 (Fed.Cir. 1996) (“[Plaintiff] need not have included this limitation in its claim. Having done so, it. must live with the language it chose.”); Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc. v. Lubrizol Corp., 64 F.3d 1553, 1557 (Fed. Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Further, it is proper for me to refer to the
recognizing that the court must give meaning to all the words in the claims holding that statutory words must be given their ordinary contemporary meaning recognizing we must give insurance policy language its ordinary and generally accepted meaning unless the policy shows that the words used are intended to impart a technical or different meaning holding that a contract should be read to give reasonable meaning to all provisions of that contract holding that we must give the words in statutes their plain and ordinary meaning