to provide this link in the summary judgment evidence. 20 . Guillory, 95 F.3d al 1327. 21 . 397 So.2d 475 (La.1981). 22 . Bazley, 397 So.2d at 481. 23 . Guillory, 95 F.3d at 1327 (citing Kent v. Jomac Products, Inc., 542 So.2d 99, 100 (La.App. 1st Cir.1989)). 24 . 907 F.Supp. 961 (M.D.La.1995). 25 . Charkhian, 907 F.Supp. at 965. 26 . Charkhian, 907 F.Supp. at 965 (citing Keating v. Shell Chem. Co., 610 F.2d 328, 332 (5th Cir.1980)). 27 . 893 F.2d 98 (5th Cir.1990), cert denied, 498 U.S. 817, 111 S.Ct. 60, 112 L.Ed.2d 35 (1990). 28 . Mitc a.1995) (in the same case on summary judgment, the Court held that the employer did not commit an "intentional act” which would lift the bar of suit under the Louisiana Workers Compensation Act); Bankston v. BASF, 827 F.Supp. 1239, (M.D.La.1993) (<HOLDING>). 36 . 872 F.Supp. 1517 (M.D.La.1995). In
holding that a change in employer from one federal contractor to another caused employees no lack of work holding in an employees action to recover for injury sustained during work against the employer and other defendants did not state an intentional tort claim against contractor holding that it is not enough that an employees job provides an opportunity to commit an intentional tort holding that an employer who commits an intentional tort against his employee cannot claim that the act was accidental so that workers compensation is the employees exclusive remedy holding that an employees action against her employer for negligent supervision lies not in tort but with an action for breach of contract