requirement has been met depends on the grounds under which relief is sought. Rule 60(b) stipulates as a general matter that motions for relief from judgment must be made “within a reasonable time,” with the further requirement that motions brought under subsections (1) through (3) of the rule be made not more than one year after judgment is entered. Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). Virginia Lee here seeks relief under subpart (b)(6), which is exclusive of the other subparts of the rule and provides relief for “any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). Therefore, I assess the timeliness of Virginia Lee’s motion on reasonableness grounds. Under Rule 60(b), timeliness must be shown by the movant. See Werner v. Carbo, 73 d 535, 538 (4th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). The Supreme Court issued its ruling in
holding a three and onehalf year delay was unreasonable holding that delay for three and onehalf years was unreasonable under rule 60b6 holding that an eight and onehalf month delay was enough to warrant further inquiry holding that a fivemonth delay in filing a motion to disqualify did not bar the motion where there was a reasonable explanation for the delay holding a plaintiffs rule 60b3 motion untimely where a three and onehalf month delay had occurred with no explanation as to the reason for the delay