(Alaska 1997). 3 . See Newcastle Properties, Inc. v. Shalowitz, 221 Ill.App.3d 716, 164 Ill.Dec. 221, 582 N.E.2d 1165, 1168 (1991). 4 . See id. 164 Ill.Dec. 221, 582 N.E.2d at 1169. 5 . Id. (quoting Village of Glenview v. Northfield Woods Water & Util. Co., 216 Ill.App.3d 40, 159 Ill.Dec. 569, 576 N.E.2d 238 (1991)). 6 . P.A. Bergner & Co. v. Lloyds lewelers, Inc., 112 Ill.2d 196, 97 Ill.Dec. 415, 492 N.E.2d 1288, 1291 (1986). 7 . Newcastle, 164 Ill.Dec. 221, 582 N.E.2d at 1169. 8 . See id. 9 . See Western Pioneer v. Harbor Enter., 818 P.2d 654, 656 n. 3 (Alaska 1991). 10 . See Smith v. State, 921 P.2d 632, 634 (Alaska 1996). 11 . See Martindell v. Lake Shore Nat’l Bank, 15 Ill.2d 272, 154 N.E.2d 683, 690 (1958). 12 . See Echo, Inc. v. Whitson Co., 121 F.3d 10 6, 1290 (N.D.Ill.1983) (<HOLDING>); Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 189
recognizing duty to deal in good faith in workers compensation setting holding that putting implied restrictions on an employmentatwill contract would be inconsistent with the express terms of the contract which allowed for termination at any time recognizing the basic principle of contract law that the obligation of good faith is an implied condition in every contract recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract holding that if the implied obligation to deal in good faith were allowed to create a cause of action in an employmentatwill situation it would eviscerate the at will doctrine altogether