going to have to find a new mommy," and that the foster mother had comforted Older Sister until she fell asleep in her arms. 116 Mother does not assert that this testimony could not evidence the trust relationships found by the juvenile court, but only that the testimony was biased and therefore unreliable. However, "[i]t is the province of the trier of fact to assess the credibility of witnesses, and we will not see-ond-guess the [juvenile] court where there is a reasonable basis to support its findings." Reed v. Reed, 806 P.2d 1182, 1184 (Utah 1991). The testimony supports the juvenile court's determination that a trust relationship existed between the children and the foster mother and between Older Sister and her therapist. Cf. In re L.N., 2004 UT App 120, ¶ 19, 91 P.3d 836 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the juvenile court did not err
holding that the trial court did not err in finding that a trust relationship existed between a foster mother and foster child where it found that the child immediately became attached to the foster mother and was confiding in her when she made statements admitted under the hearsay exception recognizing that foster parents do not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in a continued relationship with their foster child holding the foster parent did not possess a liberty interest in her relationship with the foster child holding that a child has a  1983 action against the state while in foster care where the state is deliberately indifferent to the likelihood that a foster home is unsafe yet places the child there or allows the child to remain there holding foster parents not liable for willful act of their foster child