Donerson learned that Bantum’s friends wanted to rob and potentially kill Donerson. R. 312 at 2741. As a result, Donerson gave the third shipment only to Bantum’s contact for distribution. Id In May of 2013, the government charged Bantum and seven other individuals with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. R. 39 (superseding indictment). Bantum was also charged with two counts of unlawful use of a communications facility to facilitate drug trafficking. Id at 448. After a trial, a jury convicted Bantum of all three counts. R. 216 at 1616-18; R. 218 at 1624-25. The jury also found by special verdict that Bantum was responsible’ for distributing five or more kilograms of cocaine. Id II. Bantum argues that insufficient evidence supported his conviction. Specifically, he contend 6th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>). Thus, that evidence alone would allow us to
holding that the defendants purchase or sale of a large volume of narcoticsin that case one kilogram of cocainecreates an inference that he is a willful member of the conspiracy holding that a claim arises from the purchase or sale of a security only if there is an allegation of fraud in the purchase sale or issuance of the  instrument holding that once a defendant becomes associated with a conspiracy he is responsible for all of the acts of the conspiracy even those which occurred before or after his association with the conspiracy holding that while a simple buy and sell transaction is not sufficient for proof of a conspiracy repeated transactions for large quantities are sufficient to support an inference that the buyer and seller were engaged in a conspiracy holding that a close relationship between alleged conspirators and repeated large volume transactions were sufficient to establish a conspiracy