to calculate loss the district court can consider the cost of replacing the property, U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1, comment, (n. 3(C)(i)). After Sypien received Rossini’s lulling letter in October 1998, but before she filed suit, the cost of replacing the stock at market value had climbed above $70,000, even by Rossini’s calculations. We typically do not permit generalized expectations of profit or appreciation to enter into a guideline loss calculation. See United States v. Schaefer, 384 F.3d 326, 337 (7th Cir.2004). But where the defendant makes specific representations about a property’s value or promises the victim a particular return on an investment, the defendant’s own valuation can be used to calculate loss at sentencing. See United States v. Porter, 145 F.3d 897, 900-01 (7th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Aptt, 354 F.3d
holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order holding that fraud loss includes interest that the defendant promised would accrue holding that rights accrue only when an employee vests holding that interest does not begin to accrue until the date of judgment not the date of verdict holding that a plaintiff cannot avoid the securities fraud exception by pleading mail fraud or wire fraud if the conduct giving rise to those offenses also amounts to securities fraud