action. 4. Request to Amend Complaint In this court, the Behrmann Trust argues for the first time that we should remand the case to the trial court and instruct the court to permit it to amend its complaint. The Behrmann Trust alleges that its complaint put the officers and directors on notice that it was seeking equitable relief. The Behrmann Trust could have amended its complaint in the trial court under C.R.C.P. 15(a). See Davis v. Paolino, 21 P.3d.870, 873 (Colo.App.2001) (“For purposes of this rule, a motion to dismiss does not constitute a responsive pleading.”). Because the Behrmann Trust seeks to amend its complaint for the first time on appeal, we will not grant the leave to amend its corn-plaint. See Fladung v. City of Boulder, 165 Colo. 244, 248, 438 P.2d 688, 690 (1968) (<HOLDING>) III. The complaint seeks compensatory damages
holding that court will not consider issue raised for first time on appeal holding that the plaintiff was precluded from raising the issue for the first time on appeal holding that the court bars a party from raising an issue on remand that  was not raised on appeal holding that defendant was precluded from raising suppres sion issue for the first time on appeal holding that a party may not raise an issue for the first time on appeal