(quoting Beard, 402 F.3d at 605). Here, despite the complete lack of any reasonable belief than any single student possessed any pills, the Academy searched all 134 of its students. Further, the school required all of the girls to perform the “bra lift” even if nothing revealed during the less intrusive part of the search suggested that the student was hiding contraband in her underwear. A search of the entire student body based on vague tips from unidentified students — where no follow-up investigation was made to determine who the actual perpetrators may be, how many students were estimated to be bringing pills into the school, or the nature and level of danger of the pills — was not an appropriate method of discovering the wrongdoers. See Redding, - U.S. at -, 174 L. Ed. 2d at 362 (<HOLDING>). As summarized by one scholar, Application of
holding that search of middle school student violated her fourth amendment rights holding that the excluded evidence required a finding of reasonable suspicion holding that refusal to consent to search cannot support a finding of reasonable suspicion holding the required knowledge under the reasonable suspicion standard is that a school administrators search of each student must forecast a moderate chance of finding evidence of wrongdoing holding that a school district owed the highest degree of care to a student on a school bus such that the district could be liable for the sexual abuse of the student by the school bus driver