§ 8912 provides: "The district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, concurrent with the United States Court of Fed eral Claims, of a civil action or claim against the United States founded on this chapter.” 3 . 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1) provides any "person acting under” the direction of a federal official may remove a state case brought against him "for any act under color of such office.” Because the Court concludes removal is proper on federal question grounds, the Court need not reach the defendant’s assertion that the plaintiffs’ lawsuit is removable under this statute. 4 . The Court acknowledges that this finding is in direct conflict with the case law currently surrounding this issue. See Goepel v. National Postal Mail Handlers Union, 36 F.3d 306 (3d Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Lambert v. Mail Handlers Benefit Plan, 886
holding that fehba does not completely preempt state law holding that fehba does not preempt arizona law barring subrogation of personal injury claims holding section 10 of faa is procedural and does not preempt state common law holding flsa did not preempt state law fraud claim holding that faa does not preempt state law when determining date of perfection