conviction before this Court based on a violation of constitutional rights. See Aguilar Moriega v. Dep’t. of Defense, 520 F.Supp.2d 1, 5 (D.D.C.2007); see also Kendall v. Army Bd. for Corr. of Military Records, 996 F.2d 362, 366 (D.C.Cir.1993). This Court has recognized that because military courts are independent of the federal courts, military courts are analogized to state courts when individuals convicted by court-martial seek redress in federal courts. Aguilar Moriega, 520 F.Supp.2d at 5. Thus, when reviewing a collateral attack on a court-martial, federal courts apply waiver rules identical to those applied to state courts to bar claims raised for the first time in federal court. Kendall, 996 F.2d at 366 (citing Engle v. Isaac, 456 U.S. 107, 102 S.Ct. 1558, 71 L.Ed.2d 783 (1982) (<HOLDING>)). This waiver standard has been applied in
holding that absent extraordinary circumstances a failure to comply with the statute requires a dismissal with prejudice holding that federal court cannot review claim procedurally defaulted in state court absent showing of either cause and prejudice or a fundamental miscarriage of justice holding that a showing of cause and prejudice fails to overcome a defendants initial failure to object holding a contemporaneous objection is required to preserve an issue for appellate review holding that failure to comply with state contemporaneous objection rule bars federal review absent a showing of cause and prejudice