was invalid, St. Paul Travelers was not obligated to indemnify Payne for the $250,000 confession of judgment. Id. In its order on the Pocisks and Payne’s motion to alter or amend, the court clarified that if the judgment entered on the underlying suit was vacated, it would then have jurisdiction to consider the issue of whether St. Paul Travelers’ denial of the claim was appropriate. The Pocisks then filed a motion in the Beaufort County Court of Common Pleas to vacate the $250,000 consent judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), SCRCP, and restore the action to the trial roster. The court initially denied the Pocisks the relief requested. The Pocisks filed a motion to alter or amend asserting the court’s ruling violated the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. .E.2d 244 (2001) (<HOLDING>). We find the order granting the Pocisks’
holding dismissal for failure to comply with rule 8 was dismissal of entire action which was appealable final order holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable holding order granting rule 60b relief from dismissal due to defects with service of process is not immediately appealable holding that an order granting a new trial in a civil action is appealable holding an order allowing a motion under rule 60b is not immediately appealable because it is interlocutory and does not affect a substantial right