the forum selection clause is not the product of meaningfully disparate bargaining power. As to the convenience of the Michigan forum, all individual defendants reside there and Rexair’s principal place of business is in Troy, Michigan. Plaintiff avers persuasively that Minnesota is a slightly more convenient forum. However, in the face of the parties’ expressed preference for the Eastern District of Michigan, and that Michigan appears substantially more convenient to defendants, plaintiff’s argument loses much force. CONCLUSION This action is improperly venued; thus, transfer or dismissal is warranted. The court concludes that transfer of this action to the Eastern District of Michigan is the superior alternative. See Giroir v. MBank Dallas, N.A., 676 F.Supp. 915, 923 (E.D.Ark.1987) (<HOLDING>). Based upon the files and briefs and arguments
recognizing transfer as the better option holding that the nhtsa identified particular policy reasons for its decision to allow manufacturers the option of selecting between the two seat belt designs and included this option as part of a comprehensive regulatory scheme holding that a plaintiff who has not sustained any damage as the result of a transfer of property cannot seek to set that transfer aside as fraudulent holding that the failure to condition a transfer on death or remarriage of the wife was a factor showing that the transfer was not in the nature of alimony holding that transfer was proper remedy for improper venue even though the issue of transfer was not raised until the motion hearing in circuit court