but also provides the proper framework for analyzing the execution of state search warrants.” (quotation omitted)). 2 . The officers’ brief also suggests that police were involved in a shooting incident with one of Gould, Jr.'s brothers at Gould, Sr.’s home in 1991. The evidence in the record to support this assertion is scant. Furthermore, Gould points to evidence in the record to support his contention that the officers had no knowledge of this incident, if indeed it took place. Inasmuch as the qualified immunity question turns on this issue of fact (whether an incident took place at Gould’s home in 1991, and whether the officers in this case were aware of it), we are without jurisdiction to review it. Johnson v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 311, 115 S.Ct. 2151, 132 L.Ed.2d 238 (1995) (<HOLDING>). WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Today
holding that defendant may not pursue interlocutory appeal of the denial of qualified immunity insofar as that order determines whether or not the pretrial record sets forth a genuine issue of fact for trial holding that the existence of genuine issues of material facts render not appealable a pretrial denial of summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity holding that an interlocutory appeal lies from a denial of summary judgment on a qualified immunity claim holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over statelaw tort claims on an interlocutory appeal from a denial of qualified immunity holding in the context of the assertion of a qualified immunity defense that a trial courts summary judgment order that merely determines that the pretrial record sets forth a genuine issue of fact for trial does not meet the requirements of the federal collateral order doctrine