. [Chris] to; OR intentionally aided [Chris] to: r 1(a) Attempt, with unlawful force or violence, to do bodily injury to [Kelly]; or Threaten to do bodily injury to [Kelly], accompanied by a show of immediate foree or Vlolence, and i(b). #. Use a dangerous weapon; and, 2. The [Defendant], a. I on supplemental instruction contradiets, or could reasonably be construed to contradict, the initial instructions arrived at in consultation with counsel and given to the jury before deliberation. See United States v. Mondestin, 535 Fed.Appx. 819, 823-24 (11th (per curiam) (vacating convictions after noting "several problems that arise when a court fundamentally changes [a] jury instruction in response to a question raised during deliberations"); State v. Porter, 705 P.2d 1174, 1177 (Utah 1985) (<HOLDING>). 127 Defendant claims that the district
holding that a supplemental instruction did not amount to reversible error when it merely clarified a point of law on which the jury had already been instructed holding that a final jury instruction containing the cause number 241 instead of 214 was not reversible error because it would not have been reasonable for the jury to conclude that defendant had been charged with an additional conviction holding it was reversible error to give the jury a permissive inference instruction on possession of a controlled substance holding that it was reversible error for the trial judge to engage in ex parte communications with the jury foreman which amounted to supplemental instructions to the jury without opportunity for counsel for the defense to clear up any confusion those supplemental instructions may have caused holding that where jury has been properly instructed counsel is not ineffective for failing to object to an instruction