that, to the best of her knowledge, “the documents filed with the Court and served on counsel of record in this matter constitute a true, correct, and complete copy of the administrative record in this action.” PI. 56(f) motion, Ex. B. The fact that the defendants have supplemented the record with approximately 70 pages of additional information does not raise significant questions as to the completeness of the record, particularly when the supplementary material is accompanied by affidavits stating that searches were completed to ensure that no additional documents were omitted. TOMAC erroneously asserts that all other federal agencies involved in the deci-sionmaking process are required to turn over all relevant information in their own files. Saratoga Dev. Corp., 21 F.3d at 457 (<HOLDING>). Its argument concerning additional
holding that additional records submitted to the appeals council are part of the administrative record for judicial review holding that information compiled by other agencies but never submitted to the decisionmaking agency is not part of the administrative record holding that evidence not submitted to the district court cannot be part of the record on appeal holding appeal of termination is limited to information that is part of the record holding that material submitted by appellant that is cumulative of evidence previously of record is not new