transcripts submitted by the parties, and no declaration from any ParcPlace representative has been submitted by Defendants. Moreover, the mere fact that Delphi materials were accessible to Morgan Stanley employees other than the IT Group, or were stored on a common drive or server without restriction, would not suffice to satisfy Section 102(a) or (b). The availability of such information within Morgan Stanley, after all, indicates nothing about the availability of information concerning Delphi to those outside of Morgan Stanley, or to the “public” at large. Furthermore, to the extent that the Defendants seek to establish the lack of confidentiality accorded to Delphi materials by way of submission of documents post-dating the critical dates for purp 677, 682-84 (7th Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>). But c.f. W.L. Gore & Assocs., Inc. v.
holding a document accessible only through the public reference room at the securities and exchange commission constituted a printed publication under  102b holding that public use of a beach was presumed to have originated by permission and to have continued as a license until some act  of the public or public official asserted the use to be exercised as a matter of right rather than privilege holding that public demonstration of electronic organ at show for national association of music manufacturers constituted public use under section 102b despite fact that instrument was not then available for sale to the public holding that public meeting did not satisfy public participation requirement because public did not receive adequate notice recognizing that public utilities affect the public interest in that they render essential public services to a large number of the general public