obvious scriveners' errors. With Count VII, we see that the file name was changed from "LFSOO07-0103.jpg" to "Ifs-0070103.jpg." Id. at 445, 532 respectively. Other charges were amended in a similar manner. Brown did not object to the amendment in this regard. 12 . Other jurisdictions have adopted a similar analysis. See State v. Rhoades, 690 N.W.2d 135 (Minn.App.2004); State v. Cobb, 143 N.H. 638, 732 A.2d 425 (1999); State v. Martin, 674 N.W.2d 291 (S.D.2003). But see, United States v. Reedy, 304 F.3d 358 (5th Cir.2002); Girard v. State, 883 So.2d 717 (Ala.2003). 13 . Brown cites four cases in support of his argument that multiple punishments for child exploitation and possession of child pornography violate principles of double jeopardy. See Scuro v. State, 849 N.E.2d at 687 (<HOLDING>); Adams v. State, 804 N.E.2d 1169, 1176
holding a defendant may not be convicted of more than one count of dissemination of matter harmful to minors based on one occurrence even if there was more than one victim holding that it was plain error for trial court to allow more than one conviction of grossly negligent operation of a vehicle where more than one person was injured holding that a defendant may not be convicted of multiple offenses under  922g on the basis that he belonged to more than one prohibited class or that he simultaneously possessed more than one firearm holding abusive acts within one month of receipt of deposition notices may be retaliation for initiation of lawsuit more than one year earlier holding that more than notice to a defendant is required