activities of pre-petition creditors. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(5) & (c)(2). Furthermore, to the extent that debtors, trustees, or creditors are concerned about meddling by secured creditors, potential problems of debtors managing property subject to retained liens, or abuse of the bankruptcy system by debtors, they are free to advocate that a plan defer § 1327 revesting until discharge. 9 . The Trustee argues in the alternative that even if the Talbots’ residence was not property of the bankruptcy estate, the sales proceeds representing post-confirmation appreciation in value of the residence constitutes property of the estate pursuant to § 1306(a)(1) of the Code. This is a dubious argument. See Black v. United States Postal Service (In re Heath), 115 F.3d 521, 524 (7th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Because, however, the Trustee did not raise
holding that a bankruptcy court has the authority to order the irs to apply the payments to trust fund liabilities if the bankruptcy court determines that this designation is necessary to the success of a reorganization plan holding that bankruptcy plan of reorganization rather than  1961 controlled the setting of the interest rate holding that postconfirmation income that is not necessary to the fulfillment of the plan of reorganization does not become pari of bankruptcy estate recognizing broad scope of the reorganization estate holding that remedies provided in the bankruptcy code for enforcing a chapter 11 plan of reorganization are not exclusive