although not directly accusatory, was clearly investigatory, indicating that Officer Huntington suspected that Hansen was engaged in some sort of illegal activity. Therefore, investigatory questions such as the one asked here actually cut against the proposition that a reasonable person would feel that the initial seizure has ended and that he or she is now free to terminate the encounter. Cf. Sandoval, 29 F.3d at 542 (stating that the crucial predicate to a voluntary police citizen encounter was missing because "[alt no point did the nature of those inquiries [about defendant's drug involvement] change the climate so that the reasonable listener would view participation in the exchange as freely terminable"); Washington v. Soto-Garcia, 68 Wash.App. 20, 841 P.2d 1271, 1273-74 (1992) (<HOLDING>). 115 In addition to Officer Huntington's
holding that in determining whether a seizure has occurred a court must consider if in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the encounter a reasonable person would have believed that he or she was not free to leave holding that progressive intrusion into defendants privacy was of such a nature that a reasonable person would not believe that he or she was free to end the encounter holding that an encounter is a seizure if in view of all of the circumstances surrounding the incident a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave holding that a person is seized when a reasonable person would have believed that he was not free to leave holding that a police officer who approaches a parked car and questions its occupants has not shown sufficient authority to cause a reasonable person to believe that he or she is not free to leave