and objective basis that would establish reasonable suspicion and, thus, justify their stop of McCray on August 14, 2000. The Government argues that under the totality of the circumstances, the following factors, when considered together, establish that Officers Muniz and Prado had reasonable suspicion to stop McCray on August 14, 2000: 1) the stop occurred l activity cannot, standing alone, justify an investigatory stop, see Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 52, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979); United States v. Burton, 193 F.R.D. 232, 238 (E.D.Pa.2000) le who know each other to stand in their own community and have a conversation late at night on a summer evening. 2. Presence of Gerry Bellflower Perhaps the least credible aspect of the officers’ recounting (E.D.Pa.1990) (<HOLDING>). However, the facts in this case suggest no
holding that a group of men standing with known drug traffickers who fled when officers approached established reasonable suspicion holding that police officers had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity after observing a group of men huddled around a closed store at 2 am holding that reasonable suspicion justified a terry stop of the defendant when she was walking and talking with known drug dealers who were known to be at the scene to buy and sell cocaine holding that an officers observation of a man holding his hand out with a group of other men looking down at his open palm in an high drug trafficking area late at night constituted reasonable suspicion holding that officers observation of a known drug dealer approaching the defendants car gave rise to reasonable suspicion