proceedings would have been different. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-96, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064-69, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). Graves has the burden to prove ineffective assistance of counsel and to rebut the presumption that counsel was acting according to sound trial strategy. Id. at 466 U.S. at 689, 104 S.Ct. at 2065. Guilt/Innocence Phase Following our court’s decision in Rodriguez, we hold that the trial court did not err in fading to give, sua sponte, a reasonable-doubt instruction for extraneous offenses during the guilt-innocence phase. See Rodriguez, 137 S.W.3d at 231. Graves was not entitled to the instruction; therefore, his counsel was not ineffective for failing to request it. See Hardin v. State, 951 S.W.2d 208, 211 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Punishment Phase With regard to the
holding that it was not plain error for the court not to give a self defense jury instruction where the defendant did not request one holding where defendant challenged jury instruction and also claimed ineffective assistance of counsel based upon his counsels failure to object to instruction because we find no error in the instructions defendants claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must also be rejected holding that trial counsels failure to request a limiting instruction did not constitute ineffective assistance where counsel testified he did not want to draw more attention to the incriminating evidence holding that defendant was not entitled to entrapment instruction when there was insufficient evidence to support such an instruction holding that failure to request jury instruction about manner in which evidence was obtained was not error and thus did not constitute ineffective assistance because defendant was not entitled to instruction