quasi-judicial functions which are applicable to land use including comprehensive planning, zoning, and controlling storm-water drainage and flood waters. Therefore, we hold that the proposed initiative is constitutionally deficient because it violates the single-subject requirement. Id. (emphasis supplied) (citation omitted). Unlike the proposed amendment in People’s Property Rights, which applied broadly to any type of land use and thus involved multiple levels and branches of government, the proposed amendment in this 'case calls for only one discrete change in the established scheme of comprehensive land-use plans — the local government legislative process of enactment and amendment. Cf. Coastal Dev. of N. Fla., Inc. v. City of Jacksonville Beach, 788 So.2d 204, 208-09 (Fla.2001) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the proposed amendment would not
holding acts of voting to be quintessentially legislative and the introduction of a budget to be formally legislative holding that provision in comprehensive plan requiring developer to demonstrate that proposed use is consistent with the comprehensive plans general intent and purpose was unreasonably vague subjective and did not furnish ground for denial of specialuse permit recognizing prior decision holding that adoption of and amendments to local comprehensive plans are legislative acts and holding that smallscale development amendments to local comprehensive plans are also legislative acts holding local regulation of hazardous waste disposal facilities preempted by comprehensive and detailed state regulatory scheme holding that the llupa does not provide for judicial review of requests to change zoning or comprehensive zoning plans