found that Dr. Gerber’s referral to Dr. Lusk was reasonable because it was based on his uncontested medical opinion that Dr. Lusk, with whom he practices, was well-suited to treat Endicott. The commission noted that it routinely approves referrals within an attending physician’s medical practice. The commission also found no legal or medical reason to disregard Dr. Gerber’s opinion and found sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the referral was valid. The commission further found that Dr. Gerber’s referral was based solely upon his medical opinion and not upon any agreement or lack of agreement among the parties. A commissioner dissented, stating his belief that the referral was based solely on Endicott’s request and, thus, was not reasonable or necessary E.2d 522, 525 (1985) (<HOLDING>). By statute, the commission’s award is
holding that the alj erred by failing to mention the contrary opinion of a treating physician holding that where a treating physicians opinion is contradicted by a consulting physician the alj must explain on the record the reasons for rejecting the opinion of the treating physician holding that the commissions finding that  dr troup referred the claimant to dr rezba  is supported by evidence holding that credible evidence supported the commissions factual finding that the treating physician referred claimant to the pain clinic holding that the alj must make findings setting forth specific and legitimate reasons that are supported by substantial evidence in order to reject the contradicted opinion of a treating physician