an order directing the Debtor to pay her rent in accordance with the terms of the August Stipulation. See Order Directing Debtor to Pay Certain Post-Petition Rents Owed to Landlord, August 7, 2002. 7 .Although the Stein case did not specifically deal with a rent-stabilized lease governed by the New York State Rent Stabilization Code ("the RSC”), the court noted that it "would reach the same conclusion even if it treated the occupancy right as statutory.” Id. at fn. 2 (citing Finn v. 415 Fifth Ave. Co., 153 F.2d 501, 501 (2d Cir.1946)) (Judge Learned Hand held that the bankrupt’s statutory right to possession under newly-enacted rent control laws passed to trustee), cert. denied, 328 U.S. 838, 66 S.Ct. 1014, 90 L.Ed. 1614 (1946). 8 . See Ernst v. Oberferst, 166 F.2d 519 (2d Cir.1948) (<HOLDING>); Cullen v. Bowles, 148 F.2d 621 (holding that
holding that under the filed rate doctrine a question regarding reasonable rates should be addressed to the department of insurance and that the rate plaintiff was charged is conclusively presumed reasonable under the filed rate doctrine holding that once a rate is filed with the appropriate agency except for review of the agencys orders the courts can assume no right to a different rate on that ground that in its opinion it is the only or the more reasonable rate holding that a trustee could not be compelled to pay rent on behalf of a rentstabilized debtor at a market rate which exceeded the rentstabilized rate holding that the proper rate for prejudgment interest is the rate fixed by the parties in a contract holding that with respect to the eaja the local or national market rate for legal services cannot be a special factor used to increase the rate beyond the statutory rate