the legislature clearly intended that the amendments apply prospectively at sentencing for crimes committed on or after June 13, 2002.” Id. at 190-91. We further stated: These amendments explicitly state that a defendant’s criminal history includes “washed out” convictions. Laws of 2002, ch. 107, § 2(13). Further, the legislature directed sentencing courts to consider these previously “washed out” convictions when calculating offender scores if the current version of the SRA requires consideration of that type of conviction. Laws of 2002, ch. 107, § 3(18). Id. at 191. ¶16 To review, we have applied sentencing statutes prospectively and have thus declined to apply the definition of criminal history to retroactively revive previously washed out convictions. See Smith, 144 Wn.2d at 674-75 (<HOLDING>); see Cruz, 139 Wn.2d at 193 (holding 1990 SRA
holding miranda decision does not apply retroactively holding that because the act lacked an expression of specific intent to apply retroactively the extended limitations period did not revive claims holding 1997 sra amendment does not apply retroactively to revive appellants previously washed out juvenile adjudications holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively holding that juvenile adjudications may not be used for impeachment purposes because the disposition of a juvenile does not constitute a criminal conviction