action against Respondent’s license issued pursuant to Chapter 560.” See §§ 560.114, 560.1285, 560.810, Fla. Stat. (2010); Fla. Admin. Code R. 69V-560.704. The administrative complaint gave clear notice of a point of entry, stating that failure to respond within twenty-one days of receipt would be deemed a waiver of all rights to a hearing “and Final Order will be entered without further notice.” Trisha’s One Stop failed to file a petition for hearing in response to the administrative complaint, which it received by certified mail on December 5, 2012. Accordingly, on January 25, 2013, the final order under review was entered without a hearing. As the basis for administrative action, the final order incorporated the facts alleged in the com n, 21 So.3d 919, 920 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (<HOLDING>); Aleong v. Fla. Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l
holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing quoting florida administrative code rule 281061114 holding that when wojnowski failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting ofrs intended action he waived any further opportunity to do so citing florida administrative code rule 281061114 holding no restitution hearing is mandated when defendant did not object to order of restitution or request a hearing holding reasonable an agency determination that a request for an investigative file did not include the employment file holding that florida administrative code rule 285211 which purported to allow an agency or hearing officer to dismiss a proceeding or enter a default as a sanction for failure to comply with a procedural order was invalid