but Scott Brooks declined to give his consent. Based on the strong odor of marijuana emanating from the car, the narcotics officers conducted a search of the car, and, during the search, narcotics officer Kennedy discovered marijuana in a knapsack inside the car. Upon the discovery of the marijuana, the narcotics officers arrested Scott Brooks and conducted a search of his person dining which they recovered and seized $2,725. According to Scott Brooks, the district court erred in allowing into evidence the evidence seized following the stop of his car because the stop of his car was part of a checkpoint whose primary purpose was drug interdiction, and, therefore, the checkpoint was unconstitutional. City of Indianapolis v. Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 44, 121 S.Ct. 447, 148 L.Ed.2d 333 (2000) (<HOLDING>). In making this argument, Scott Brooks posits
recognizing that the primary purpose of tr  162051 is protection of the public holding that contracts where the primary purpose is to restrain trade are void holding that the determination and assessment of damages are not the primary purpose of a declaratory action recognizing that in interpreting a statute our primary purpose is to ascertain the intent of the legislature holding that a checkpoint whose primary purpose is drug interdiction is unconstitutional