concerning solid waste collection and disposal services at Fairchild AFB initially that was set aside under the HUBZone Small Business Program. See AR 1, 150-77; see also 15 U.S.C. § 657a. Because the Air Force cancelled Solicitation No. F45613-02-Q-A027 and later Solicitation No. F45613-03-Q-A028, and instead issued Sole-Source Solicitation No. F45613-03-Q-A068, to avoid awarding the contract under the HUBZone program, Blue Dot had a “connection” to the procurement, but also lost the economic opportunity of being awarded the contract with a value of approximately $[ ]. Therefore, Blue Dot has established a significant economic interest in Sole-Source Solicitation No. F45613-03-Q-A068 and Contract No. FA4620-04-D-A003 to qualify as an “interested party.” See Impresa, 238 F.3d at 1334 (<HOLDING>); MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. United
holding that unsuccessful bidder is awarded its bid preparation costs because the government violated its implied contract to have the involved bids fairly and honestly considered  holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract holding that if the government is obligated to rebid the contract and the unsuccessful bidder could compete for the contract once again and therefore has an economic interest and standing to challenge the award holding that the losing bidder has standing to challenge the award of a government procurement contract holding that city had implied contract with bidder to treat bidder fairly