Pridgen v. Green Tree Fin. Servicing Corp., 88 F. Supp. 2d 655, 658-59 (S.D. Miss. 2000) (under Mississippi l - scionable under California law arbitration provision that prohibited class actions, required the result of the arbitration provision be confidential, and contained judicial carve-out only for party that drafted contract); E-Z Cash Advance, Inc. v. Harris, 60 S.W.3d 436, 441 (Ark. 2001) (arbitration provision in "payday loan" that retained judicial remedies for lender unconscionable because "[t]here is no mutuality of obligation where one party uses an arbitration agreement to shield itself from litigation, while reserving to itself the ability to pursue relief through the court system"); Flores v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc., 113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 376, 854 (Cal. Ct. App. 2001) (<HOLDING>); Palm Beach Motor Cars Ltd., Inc. v. Jeffries,
holding unconscionable arbitration provision that applied to all claims brought by borrower in reverse mortgage contract but not claims brought by the drafting party the lender holding that tort actions brought against a state actor must be brought in the illinois court of claims and the district courts dismissal of such claims was proper holding that an arbitration agreement between a lender and a borrower that included a bilateral exception for claims less than 10000 was not substantively unconscionable even if one party is substantively more likely to bring small claims actions   holding that congress overstepped its constitutional authority when divesting states of immunity for claims brought under the ada and holding that states are protected by immunity for claims brought under these statutes holding that tort claims that could have been brought outside the bankruptcy environment are noncore without discussing whether claims were brought pre or postpetition