(citations omitted) (quoting Fitzpatrick, 427 U.S. at 456, 96 S.Ct. 2666)). Our sister circuits wrongly equate the result afforded by congressional power under the Fourteenth Amendment and Article I with the constitutional structure under which Congress governs and the federal courts exercise jurisdiction. When the states adopted the Fourteenth Amendment and consented to cede a portion of their authority to the federal government, it was within their contemplation that they limited them Eleventh Amendment immunity. Fitzpatrick teaches so, and we adhere to its reasoning. See 42,1 U.S. at 453-54, 96 S.Ct. 2666. Although there may be some property interests that are not protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, see, e.g., Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693, 712, 96 S.Ct. 1155, 47 L.Ed.2d 405 (1976) (<HOLDING>), and discriminating between property interests
holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel holding that the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the district of columbia holding that the fourteenth amendment does not secure to persons the right to prevent disclosure of their arrest recognizing that corporations are persons within the meaning of the fourteenth amendment holding the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the actions of the federal government