Ana Luisa Reyes-Velasquez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reo evidence regarding her younger daughter’s asthma that Reyes-Velasquez presented with her motion to reopen concerned an entirely new basis for finding hardship. See id. at 601-02. We therefore have jurisdiction to consider whether the BIA abused its discretion in considering whether that evidence justified reopening. See id. (<HOLDING>). The BIA did not abuse its discretion by
holding that the trial courts denial of a motion to set aside the verdict for insufficient evidence is reviewable only for abuse of discretion holding that the bias consideration of evidence directed at an entirely new basis for finding hardship is reviewable for abuse of discretion as the petitioner is presenting a basis for relief that was not previously denied in the exercise of the agencys unreviewable discretion holding that the district courts denial of a downward departure was an exercise of discretion and therefore not reviewable holding that the admission of evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding failure to exercise discretion is abuse of discretion