279 (capitalization omitted). Looking to the contents of those documents rather than their captions, the court reasoned: “Neither document is a judgment or decree, ¡former] ORS 19.010(1), or the kind of order described in ¡former] ORS 19.010(2), which is treated as a judgment or decree for the purpose of being reviewed on appeal. Neither document qualifies as an order embraced within ¡former] ORS 19.010(4) which confers appellate jurisdiction in special statutory proceedings. Cf ORS 28.040 and 28.070. This appeal must be dismissed on our own motion for want of appellate jurisdiction.” Id. at 280. In this case, the document from which appellants seek to appeal is not a final judgment within the meaning of ORS 19.205(1). Widing v. Estate of Glenn A. Widing, 149 Or App 4 8 P2d 196 (1995) (<HOLDING>). The order in this case does not prevent a
recognizing that an order denying a motion to modify a family court order where the motion is based on changed factual or legal circumstances is appealable as a special order after final judgment holding that when the trial court signed an order dismissing the plaintiffs complaint but refused to enter a final judgment on that order the order refusing to enter judgment was appealable under former ors 190102a holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable holding that an order denying an allegedly indigent plaintiffs motion for a fee waiver or deferral was appealable under former ors 190102a because the order closed the courthouse door holding that an order denying a motion to vacate a  1782 order and denying a motion to quash the subpoena was immediately appealable