235, 127 P.3d 138, 141 (2005); Am. Gen. Home Equity, Inc. v. Kestel, 253 S.W.3d 543, 547 n. 2 (Ky.2008); Commonwealth v. Philip Morris Inc., 448 Mass. 836, 864 N.E.2d 505, 511 (2007); Banks v. City Fin. Co., 825 So.2d 642, 647-48 (Miss.2002); State ex rel. Bruning v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 275 Neb. 310, 746 N.W.2d 672, 678 (2008); Edward Family Ltd. v. Brown, 140 N.M. 104, 140 P.3d 525, 529 (Ct.App.2006); Ass'n of Unit Owners of Bridgeview Condos. v. Dunning, 187 Or.App. 595, 69 P.3d 788, 801 (2003); Powell v. Cannon, 179 P.3d 799, 806-7 (Utah 2008); Scherer v. Schuler Custom Homes Constr., Inc., 98 P.3d 159, 162 (Wyo.2004). 14 . Perry Homes v. Cull, 258 S.W.3d 580, 586 n. 13 (Tex.2008). 15 . 193 S.W.3d 897, 898 (Tex.2006); see also Chambers v. O'Quinn, 242 S.W.3d 30, 32 (Tex.2007) (<HOLDING>). 16 . Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191,
holding plaintiff waived right to arbitration by not simultaneously requesting a stay and an order of arbitration at the time of the complaint holding denial of mandamus challenging arbitration order did not bar appeal of that order after arbitration was completed holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award holding that completed arbitration pending appeal mooted district courts order directing arbitration holding that a party who is erroneously deprived of the benefits of an arbitration contract under the federal arbitration act is without adequate remedy by appeal and entitled to mandamus relief