Henderson v. Bluemink, 511 F.2d 399, 402-03 (D.C.Cir.1974); Ex parte Cranman, 792 So.2d 392, 403-06 (Ala.2000); Jinkins v. Lee, 209 Ill.2d 320, 282 Ill.Dec. 787, 807 N.E.2d 411, 420-21 (2004); Gould v. O’Bannon, 770 S.W.2d 220, 221-22 (Ky.1989); Kelley v. Rossi, 395 Mass. 659, 481 N.E.2d 1340, 1344 n.6 (1985); Terwilliger v. Hennepin Cnty., 561 N.W.2d 909, 913-14 (Minn.1997); Kassen v. Hatley, 887 S.W.2d 4, 9-12 (Tex.1994), superseded by statute as recognized in Franka v. Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367, 381-85 (Tex.2011); James v. Jane, 221 Va. 43, 282 S.E.2d 864, 867-70 (1980). We recognize, however, that among the relatively few cases addressing prison physicians, there is a divergence of opinions as to whether immunity applies. See Ross v. Schackel, 920 P.2d 1159, 1165 n.5 (Utah 1996) (<HOLDING>). Those jurisdictions granting immunity to
recognizing split recognizing circuit split recognizing a split of authority on this issue recognizing without resolving the split in authority on the meaning of the word recognizing that there is a split of authority on this question of which cpiu source should control