support his family during this quest, to once again bear the financial consequences of his personal ambition. In short, he has the current ability to pay, and in the near future his income prospects will increase significantly, with - or without the additional fellowship. This, coupled with the circumstances surrounding the bankruptcy filing, and the purpose and use of the debts incurred, justify a conclusion that this case presents a substantial abuse of the provisions of Chapter 7. Wé affirm the decision of the Bankruptcy Court. 1 . The orders appealed from are published at In re Stewart, 201 B.R. 996 (Bankr.N.D.Okla.1996) ("Stewart I”) (dismissing debtor’s case for substantial abuse of provisions of Chapter 7); and In re Stewart, 204 B.R. 780 (Bankr.N.D.Okla.1997) (“Stewart II") (<HOLDING>). 2 . By then, he had married Patricia, who had
holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution holding that the sentencing guidelines disparate treatment of crack cocaine is not racially discriminatory under the fifth amendments equal protection guarantees holding that the fifth amendments protection against selfincrimination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment holding that  707b does not violate the equal protection guarantees of the fourteenth and fifth amendments of the united states constitution and rejecting debtors voidforvagueness argument