Judge. Clarence Jones appeals r section 939.185, Florida Statutes (2004); however, we find no error in the imposition of that cost. See Griffin v. State, 980 So.2d 1035 (Fla.2008) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm Jones’s convictions
holding that the ex post facto clause  has no application to deportation holding that the retroactive application of a statute authorizing the assessment of a cost to a defendant who committed the felony pri or to the statutes enactment did not violate ex post facto laws holding that retroactive application of mvra does not violate the ex post facto clause because restitution is not a criminal punishment holding retroactive application of idra would violate the ex post facto clause holding that retroactive application of ohios residency restriction statute violates the federal ex post facto clause