state habe-as proceedings. Accordingly, we do not construe his petition to be making this claim as a standalone argument but rather as part of the overall picture. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b); Nickleson v. Stephens, 803 F.3d 748, 752-54 (5th Cir. 2015). In any event, the claim fails. We have previously determined the failure to file a motion in limine and the failure to object to the admission of the testimony was ineffective assistance of counsel where defense counsel executed an affidavit that the failure was not strategy and a "review of the record d[id] not provide a basis for failing to object.” See White v. Thaler, 610 F.3d 890, 907-08 (5th Cir. 2010). Although Franklin testified that "the idea that [Cortez’s attorneys] had some big strategy before the [polygr 175-77 (5th Cir. 2015) (<HOLDING>). 3 . Cortez rests his failure-to-object
holding that to prove ineffectiveness where defendant rejected plea offer upon advice of counsel defendant must show he would have accepted the offer had counsel advised correctly the state would not have withdrawn its offer the court would have accepted the offer and the resulting sentence would have been less severe holding that a reasonable officer could not have been expected to anticipate that ten to fifteen minutes of unauthorized detention would amount to a greater than de minimis injury holding claim that counsel failed to convey a plea offer that was more favorable than the sentence imposed after trial together with an assertion that defendant would have pleaded had he or she known of the offer is facially sufficient holding that to demonstrate prejudice resulting from counsels deficient performance that caused a defendant to forgo a favorable plea offer a defendant must show that he would have accepted the offer to plead and that there is a reasonable probability neither the prosecution nor the trial court would have prevented the offer from being accepted or implemented holding that it was reasonable that counsel would not anticipate that the prosecution would attempt to offer inadmissible polygraph evidence