CURIAM: Appellant Jeremy Tyson Govan was convicted of conspiracy to possess and distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. s motion to suppress. The district court noted that, although Riley was not decided until six months after Govan’s phone was searched, Riley applied retroactively to Govan’s case under Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229, 131 S.Ct. 2419, 2430, 180 L.Ed.2d 285 (2011) (<HOLDING>) (citations omitted). Thus, the district court
holding newly announced rules of constitutional criminal procedure must apply retroactively to all cases state or federal pending on direct review or not yet final with no exception holding that batson does apply retroactively to cases pending on direct review holding that a new rule for conducting criminal prosecutions should be applied to all cases pending on direct review or not yet final holding that all newly declared rules must be applied retroactively to all criminal eases pending on direct review holding that the rule announced in ring does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review