Here, defendant objected to the particular sanction that the trial court imposed. Although defendant did not propose lesser sanctions, Wyatt does not require that he do so to preserve the issue. We accordingly turn to the merits of defendant’s second argument. The court has held that, when a witness’s death during a civil trial prevented the opposing party from l defendant’s right to testify is subject to the state’s right to cross-examine him or her. See Mende, 304 Or at 21. ORS 136.643 expressly conditions the defendant’s right to testify on the state’s right of cross-examination, and defendant does not argue that either the state or federal constitution prohibits the legislature from imposing that condition. Such an argument would be difficult to mount. See Rogers, 330 Or at 301-02 (<HOLDING>); Brown v. United States, 356 US 148, 154-56,
holding that subrogation rights are not security interests under ucc article 9 recognizing that rights under article i section 11 are subject to reasonable limitations recognizing that reasonable time limitations may be placed on the exercise of constitutional rights recognizing court discretion in determining reasonable fee under rule 11 holding reimbursement to a religious institution the salvation army for emergency services expenditures permissible under article ii section 12 of arizona constitution an identical provision to article i section 11