government provided testimony indicating that Juarez-Gomez drove to and stopped at the trailer for an extended period of time on two separate days after drug sales. On the second day that Juarez-Gomez drove to the trailer, Detective Marbrey asked the landlord of the trailer to notify him when the yellow truck left the trailer. The landlord called Marbrey the next morning when the truck had departed the trailer, permitting the jury to draw the reasonable inference that Juarez-Gomez stayed at the trailer overnight. 6 . The government presented both argument and evidence at trial sufficient to permit the jury to conclude that A.G. was Juarez-Gomez’ have rejected such an argument in unpublished decisions. See United States v. Gutierrez, 506 Fed.Appx. 714, 722 (10th Cir.2012) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Salguero-Ortiz, 483
holding that departure based on deportable alien status was prohibited holding that the district court could consider increased sentence severity resulting from deportable alien status holding that deportable alien status is not a ground for departing downward holding that restitution is not a proper ground for departing downward from the guidelines range holding that defendants status as a deportable alien could be considered by the district court at sentencing