on the Code of Criminal Procedure, ch. XXXVI, § 370 at 505 (1864), codified in General Laws of Oregon, ch. XXXVI, § 370 (Deady and Lane 1843-1872), which states that "[a] peace officer may, without a warrant, arrest a person ... [wlhen a felony has in fact been committed, and he has reasonable cause for believing the person arrested to have committed it." 14 . State v. Joubert, 20 P.3d 1115, 1118-19 (Alaska 2001). 15 . Id. (citation omitted). 16 . See Merrill v. State, 457 P.2d 231, 234 (Alaska 1969), overruled on other grounds by Donnelly v. State, 516 P.2d 396, 399 n. 6 (Alaska 1973) (finding that there was probable cause to arrest a suspect based on his identification by an accomplice). 17 . Cf. Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797, 802-04, 91 S.Ct. 1106, 1110-11, 28 LEd.2d 484 (1971) (<HOLDING>). 18 . See Carter v. State, 910 P.2d 619, 626
holding that successful party is one who is the ultimate prevailing party in the litigation holding that in a situation where the police have probable cause to arrest one party and reasonably mistake a second party for that first party the arrest of the second party is still a valid arrest holding that a warrantless arrest does not violate the fourth amendment if at the time of the defendants arrest police had probable cause to believe that an offense has been is being or will be committed holding avoiding arrest is not the same as resisting arrest holding that initial illegal detention does not call into question validity of arrest pursuant to valid warrant wjhere the police effectuate an arrest in an illegal manner but nonetheless have probable cause to make the arrest the proper fourth amendment remedy is to exclude only that evidence which is a fruit of the illegality