so dieying (dying) shall revert to and become a part of the corpus of my estate and be divided equally among my surviving child or children and in the proportion and manner as herein stated. Lockett, 84 S.W.2d at 802 (error in original as reported by court). The plain language of the Lockett will provides that the estate property shall “revert.” The term “revert” does not appear in either Will at issue here. As noted in Estate of Florence and Lockett, we construe the instrument from its four corners, and nowhere in either Will does the word “revert” appear. We note that Lockett is from a line of cases which authorize the possibility of estate property reverting, or acting as a determinable fee. See St. Paul’s Sanitarium v. Freeman, 102 Tex. 376, 878, 117 S.W. 425, 426 (Tex.1909) (<HOLDING>); Federal Land Bank of Houston v. Little, 130
holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision holding that death without lawful issue means death at any time while relying on case where the bequest provided the defeasible gift through the occurrence of the event of a dying at any time holding that a person who was a juvenile at the time of the offense cannot be sentenced to death holding that if a trial court has rejected death as a possible sentence double jeopardy bars the state from seeking the death penalty at resentencing even where rejection of the death sentence was based on a legal error holding that where the law is unsettled at the time of trial but settled by the time of appeal the plainness of the error should be judged by the law at the time of appeal