behavior of which they were aware); Gallo v. Wonderly Co., Inc., 2014 WL 36628, *8 (N.D.N.Y.2014) (a person may be liable under § 296 for taking no action to remedy discriminatory behavior); Lewis v. Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Autk, 77 F.Supp.2d 376, 384 (S.D.N.Y.1999) (“the case law establishes beyond cavil that a supervisor’s failure to take adequate remedial measures can rise to the level of ‘actual participation’ under HRL § 296(6)”) accord Cid v. ASA Institute of Business & Computer Technology, Inc., 2013 WL 1193056, *6 (E.D.N.Y.2013) (failure to investigate complaints of discrimination provides sufficient basis for aiding and abetting liability under New York City Human Rights law) (citations omitted); cf. Morgan v. NYS Atty. Gen. ’s Office, 2013 WL 491525, *13 (S.D.N.Y.2013) (<HOLDING>). Defendant also argues that his alleged
recognizing that in this circuit a plaintiff may plead a theory of aiding and abetting liability under the ats holding that plaintiff failed to state a claim for conspiracy pursuant to  1985 for failure to allege a meeting of the minds recognizing aiding and abetting conversion holding the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case that the defendants failure to promote him was discriminatory where the plaintiff failed to that show he was qualified for the relevant position recognizing that the failure to investigate could constitute aid and abetting liability but finding this plaintiff failed to allege that he ever brought the discriminatory conduct to his superiors