false imprisonment accrues on the discharge from imprisonment”). The Supreme Court in Wallace v. Kato recently explained that the statute of limitations for a Fourth-Amendment claim for false arrest or imprisonment “begin[s] to run ... when the alleged false imprisonment ends.” 549 U.S. at 389, 127 S.Ct. 1091 (internal quotation marks omitted). The Supreme Court found that the false imprisonment ends for either tort when the victim is released, or when the victim’s imprisonment becomes “pursuant to [legal] process — when, for example, he is bound over by a magistrate or arraigned on charges.” Id. See Stevenson v. Grace, 356 Fed.Appx. 97, 98 (10th Cir.2009)(“Specifically, a Fourth Amendment claim for false arrest/false imprisonment accrues when the victim is releas 1 (Ind.Ct.App.2008)(<HOLDING>); Dunn v. Felty, 226 S.W.3d 68, 72
holding that there is no  1983 cause of action for false arrest unless the arresting officer lacked probable cause holding that johnsons cause of action for false imprisonmentfalse arrest accrued when he was bound over for trial in march 2003 holding that probable cause is a complete defense to an action for false arrest holding that a cause of action for illegal arrest and false imprisonment accrued at the time plaintiff was released from his alleged illegal restraint and not when the proceedings by which his arrest occurred terminated holding that the cause of action accrued on the date of sale