or justify its action. If the aggrieved party is not then satisfied, the matter shall be submitted to the American Arbitration Association for final and mutually binding resolution by it including the award of damages or other relief. Peoples Security, 867 F.2d at 810 n. 1. The court held that this language was broad enough to encompass a claim of fraud in the inducement of the agreement. Id. at 813-14. In so holding, the court reversed the determination by the district court that the arbitration clause in question was not broad enough to cover the fraudulent inducement claim. The Peoples Security court cited with approval several cases from other jurisdictions construing language similar to that contained in the Alamria/Telcor Contract. See e.g., S.A. Mineracao, 745 F.2d at 192 (<HOLDING>) (second alteration in original); Life of
holding that the language of the arbitration clause   any controversy or claim arising out of     was broad enough to encompass the plaintiffs claim alleging fraud in the inducement of the contract holding that a clause requiring arbitration wjhenever any question or dispute shall arise or occur under this agreementcontract was sufficiently broad to cover a claim of fraudulent inducement holding that a clause covering any controversy or claim  related directly or indirectly to this agreement was a broad arbitration clause holding that the clause any dispute that shall arise between the parties  with reference to the interpretation of this agreement or their rights with respect to any transaction involved was broad holding that a clause requiring arbitration of any controversy or claim that shall arise out of this agreement or the breach thereof was sufficiently broad to cover a 1934 securities act claim involving fraudulent misrepresentation