Oil, executed in 1966, and the contract | gterminating those agreements in the 1972 (collectively, the “Agreements”). Pursuant to the Agreements, Gulf Oil assigned its rights to drill for and produce sulfur to Jefferson Lake, and in return Gulf Oil received a percentage of royalty interest from Jefferson Lake’s operations on the leased premises. Upon termination of the assignment, all of Jefferson Lake’s interest in the leased premises reverted to Gulf Oil, and Jefferson Lake agreed to remove any pipes used in its operations. For the purposes of this appeal, the focus should be on whether or not these facts could cause Jefferson Lake and Gulf Oil to be considered joint or solidary obligors. Layman v. City of New Orleans, et al., 1998-0705, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir.1998), 753 So.2d 254, 256 (<HOLDING>). Whether or not, the mineral lease constituted
holding that a defendant need only plead the facts upon which a finding of solidary liability would be based ie it is sufficient that a defendant plead facts that would if proven cause the named defendant to be considered joint tortfeasors and therefore solidarily liable holding that plaintiff failed to plead facts sufficient to allege affirmative misconduct on the part of the government holding that defendant failed to plead sufficient facts and instructing the trial court to dismiss the plaintiff from the case holding that to rebut presumption plaintiff need only allege specific facts not plead evidence holding a plaintiff must plead sufficient factual allegations to establish that a plausible contract exists but need not plead every detail of the contract