v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985). 40 . Id. at 678, 105 S.Ct. 3375.' 41 . Kyles v. Whitley, 514 U.S. 419, 434, 115 S.Ct. 1555, 131 L.Ed.2d 490 (1995). 42 . R. at 2459-64. 43 . R. at 2459. 44 . R. at 2456 (emphasis in original). 45 . Ind. at 46. 46 . Burton's Form 302 at 4-5. 47 . Burton’s Form 302 at 7. 48 . Burton’s Interview Notes at 2. 49 . Burton’s Interview Notes at 6-7. 50 . Ind. at 46. 51 . Burton's Form 302 at 8. 52 . Burton's Interview Notes at 7. 53 . Ind. at 46. 54 . Burton's Form 302 at 9. 55 . Burton’s Interview Notes at 8. 56 . Ind. at 46. 57 . Burton's Form 302 at 9. 58 . Burton's Form 302 at 10. 59 . Burton's Interview Notes at 9. 60 . Burton’s Interview Notes at 9. 61 . See United States v. Martin, 565 F.2d 362, 364 (5th Cir.1978) (<HOLDING>). 62 . Ind. at 46. 63 . Burton's Form 302 at
holding that an fbi agents notes were not a witness statement within the act because there was no evidence that the witness adopted or approved what was recorded holding that an fbi agents rough notes of an interview of the defendant were not brady material because there was no independent showing that they contained evidence that was material to the defendants guilt or innocence holding that agents rough notes were not statements under the jencks act where notes were scattered and all the information contained in them was available to the defendant in other forms holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the fbi informants file contained no brady material not already provided to the defendant in a summary holding that an appellants due process rights were not violated when he did not receive brady material before his transfer hearing because he will be able to make effective use of any brady material at trial