that this limitation reinforced its earlier conclusion about the way in which the Second Amendment’s operative clause furthered the Amendment’s purpose. See id. at 2815-16. Applying Heller to the facts of this case, we conclude that the pipe bombs at issue were not protected by the Second Amendment. Unlike the handguns in Heller, pipe bombs are not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes. See United States v. Dempsey, 957 F.2d 831, 834 (11th Cir.1992) (adopting the Ninth Circuit’s reasoning that, “unlike firearms which may be used for sports, recreation or for collection, pipe bombs have no legitimate purpose”) (citing United States v. Loveday, 922 F.2d 1411, 1416 (9th Cir. 1991)); see also United States v. Fincher, 538 F.3d 868, 870, 873-74 (8th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1369, 173
holding that possession of a sawedoff shotgun under 26 usc  5861d is a crime of violence and noting that congress found certain firearms  sawedoff shot guns and grenades  to be inherently dangerous and lacking in usefulness other than for violent and criminal purposes holding that evidence obtained following the polices unconstitutional search of the defendants backpack which was not with the defendant at the time of the search and in which the police found a sawedoff shotgun was sufficiently far from the unconstitutional search because the challenged evidence was obtained as a result of the polices decision to pursue the defendant a decision they would have made even absent finding the sawedoff shotgun because the defendant was a person of interest in their underlying investigation holding that possession of sawedoff shotgun is violent felony as defined by armed career criminal act holding that after heller the defendants possession of a machine gun and an unregistered sawedoff shotgun was not protected by the second amendment because those weapons were not in common use by lawabiding citizens for lawful purposes and therefore fell within the category of dangerous and unusual weapons that the government can prohibit for individual use holding that for purposes of  4b12 possession of a sawedoff shotgun in violation of  5861d is a crime of violence because by its very nature a sawedoff shotgun always creates a serious risk of physical injury to another