a label such as alimony, support, or maintenance in the decree or agreement, (2) a direct payment to the former spouse, as opposed to the assumption of a third-party debt, and (3) payments that are contingent upon such events as death, remarriage, or eligibility for Social Security benefits. An award that is designated as support by the state court and that has the above indicia of a support obligation (along with any others that the state support statute considers)' should be conclusively presumed to be a support obligation by the bankruptcy court. A non-debtor spouse who demonstrates that these indicia are present has satisfied his or her burden of proving that the obligation constitutes support within the meaning of § 523, and is thus nondischargeable. See Calhoun, 715 F.2d at 1111 (<HOLDING>). The burden then shifts to the debtor spouse
holding that the defendant bears the burden of proving outside contact with the jury holding that the government must satisfy its burden of proving contract damages holding that the nondebtor spouse has the burden of proving nondischargeability holding that the burden of proving that the employee did not make reasonable efforts is on the defendant holding that the burden of proving lack of negligence is on the owner