'[n]o action may be brought in accordance with Section 46a-100 unless the complainant has received a release from the commission.' ”). 16 . For information on the exhaustion requirements under the ADEA, see O’Neil v. Montgomery County Cmty. College, No. 05-5169, 2006 WL 1648990, at *2 (E.D.Pa. June 12, 2006) (The ADEA "require[s] a plaintiff to file a complaint with the [Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC”)] within 300 days of the alleged unlawful employment activity prior to bringing suit. Under a sharing agreement between the PHRC and the EEOC, a complaint filed with the PHRC can be deemed filed with the EEOC, even if the complainant did not explicitly request a dual filing") (internal citations omitted). 17 . See Mead v. Burns, 199 Conn. 651, 509 A.2d 11, 17-18 (1986) (<HOLDING>); Green v. Gov’t Employees Ins. Co., No.
holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  33ll4la of the act holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  331143 and 5 of the unfair trade practices act holding that a cause of action exists under the connecticut unfair trade practices act for violations of the cuipa holding that the lottery commission was not a person under the unfair practices act holding connecticut statelaw unfair trade practices claim to be subject to noerr immunity because connecticut statute was coextensive with federal statute subject to noerr