investigators. The immediate goal of the FBI was to secure documents relevant to a criminal investigation that could be admissible in subsequent criminal prosecutions. The federal investigators were involved at every step of the search. Federal investigators initiated the search of the HRC offices. The agents directed the search and had HRC employees point out offices and work areas relevant to the subpoena which they then proceeded to search. Additionally, the FBI secured the building over the weekend and did not allow HRC employees access to their offices. The extensive involvement of the federal agents did not make the search of Jones’ office a routine file retrieval case under O’Connor. See Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67, 84, 121 S.Ct. 1281, 149 L.Ed.2d 205 (2001) (<HOLDING>). Ill The government also appeals the district
holding that alleged misconduct by public officials particularly by law enforcement officials is matter of public concern holding that consensual suspicionless searches of government employees personal belongings in the workplace were searches even though refusal to consent carried no criminal penalty and the searches were not for law enforcement purposes recognizing that hawaii law does not allow parnar claims where the public policy at issue is contained in a statute  that provides a remedy for violations of that policy holding that the irs has a law enforcement purpose in the context of a criminal tax investigation holding that the extensive involvement of law enforcement officials at every stage of the drug testing policy administered by the hospital did not allow the policy to fall within the special needs doctrine which has been used to uphold suspicionless searches performed for reasons unrelated to law enforcement