insufficient evidence to support his conviction of possession of methamphetamine. The Utah Code provides, "It is unlawful ... for any person knowingly and intentionally to possess ... a controlled substance." Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8@)(a)G) (LexisNexis 2012); see also id. § 58-37-4(2)(b)G@ii)(B) (categorizing methamphetamine as a controlled substance). Although Gonzalez-Camargo did not have any drugs on his person when he was arrested, "[al person who does not have actual physical possession may still be convicted ... if the State can prove constructive possession." Wo premises where the controlled substance is discovered must be combined with other evidence sufficient to establish the defendant's knowing and intentional control over it, See Workman, 2005 UT 66, ¶¶ 34-35, 122 P.3d 639 (<HOLDING>); State v. Hansen, 732 P.2d 127, 129, 132 (Utah
holding that a defendants sister could consent to a search of only the common areas of their shared house and her own bedroom and explicitly stating that the sister could not consent to search the defendants bedroom because the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her own bedroom holding that a woman can consent to a search of a bedroom shared by herself and the man she lived with including the closet holding that the enhancement applied where the defendant possessed a firearm in connection with possessing methamphetamine holding that the cumulative effect of the evidence was sufficient to establish that defendant constructively possessed the methamphetamine laboratory discovered in a bedroom she shared with a renter holding that the defendants sentence had been improperly enhanced where there was no evidence that the defendant constructively possessed or exercised control over the weapon