In Re: Exhaustion of State Remedies in Criminal and Post-Conviction Relief Cases, No. 218 Judicial Administration Docket No.l (per curiam ) (May 9, 2000) (stating effective immediately, following adverse order from Superior Court or Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, petition for rehearing or allowance of appeal no longer required in post-conviction relief matters to exhaust state court remedies for purposes of federal habeas proceedings). 14 . Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 15 . "Exculpatory evidence is that which extrinsically tends to establish defendant's innocence of the crimes charged, as differentiated from that which, although favorable, is merely collateral or impeaching.” Commonwealth v. Hicks, 270 Pa.Super. 546, 411 A.2d 1220, 1222 (1979) (<HOLDING>). 16 . Ms. Bayan gave her observations to
holding that new evidence must be evidence that is not merely cumulative holding that new evidence is evidence not previously of record and not merely cumulative of other evidence holding district court did not err in admitting reports that were merely cumulative of evidence already in the record holding error in admission of evidence is harmless when it was merely cumulative to other evidence in the record holding statement that was merely cumulative which did not add helpful facts or strengthen claim is not exculpatory