feet leave the ground, drives extended distance (including 32 to 36 hours without an overnight stop from Houston, Texas to Monterrey, California), shops, works out in a gym (including riding a-stationary bicycle), lifts 70 pounds easily and can lift 90 pounds, can study and learn new skills, and regularly works 10 to 12 hours per day for his current employer. In light of case law from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit which establishes that even serious impairments do not necessarily rise to the level of a “disability,” Plaintiffs impairment does not, as a matter of law, rise to the level required to fall within the ADA’s definition of a substantial impairment of a major life activity. See, e.g., Talk v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 165 F.3d 1021, 1025 (5th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); Bridges v. City of Bossier, 92 F.3d 329, 334
recognizing sleeping as major life activity holding that restrictions on bending stooping and squatting do not significantly restrict a major life activity holding that a leg deformity which caused moderate difficulty in walking and a limp resulting in walking at a significantly slower pace than the average person were not substantial limitations in the major life activity of walking holding that a plaintiffs ability to walk was not substantially limited simply because she walked with a limp moved slower than other people and was required to wear special orthopedic shoes holding that reproduction is not a major life activity