by the condemnor to the court or parties, or if it does not pay, the time of trial. E.g., City of Cottleville v. Am. Topsoil, Inc., 998 S.W.2d 114, 118 (Mo.Ct.App.1999). But see State ex rel. Highway Comm’n v. Galloway, 292 S.W.2d 904, 909 (Mo.Ct.App.1956) (finding that trial court could interpret Missouri statutes to say that the taking occurred when the Commissioners’ Report was filed — but only for the purposes of determining for what period plaintiff was entitled to interest, not for determining when the city obtained the land.). It is on this date that the condemnor obtains title and its right to possess the land. City of St. Louis v. Oakley, 354 Mo. 124, 188 S.W.2d 820, 821 (1945) (en banc); St. Louis, Keokuk & Northwestern Ry. Co. v. Clark, 121 Mo. 169, 25 S.W. 906, 907 (1894) (<HOLDING>); City of Cottleville, 998 S.W.2d at 118. For
holding that the assessment is given the force of a judgment and if the amount assessed is not paid when due administrative officials may seize the debtors property to satisfy the debt holding that in a suit on a property damage insurance policy in which liability is not disputed but in which the amount of damage is disputed the amount is unliquidated holding that the appropriation of the land is complete when the amount of damage awarded by the commissioners is paid and possession is taken holding that the amount of water rights appurtenant to the land is the amount that is being used thereon before and at the time of the sale holding that a landowner who lost a strip of property to a highway widening project could not recover losses caused by concurrent placement of a median strip because when less than the entire property is taken compensation for damage to the remainder can be awarded only if such damage is caused by the taking and cjonstruction of the median not the taking caused the alleged damage