was rendered involuntary because his counsel misadvised him regarding the sentence that would be imposed. Specifically, he claims that counsel advised him that he would be sentenced to 3 years in prison followed by 3 years of probation, but the trial court ultimately imposed a 10-year sentence followed by 5 years of probation. The record on appeal contains Beene’s signed plea form, which states that Beene’s counsel would be recommending a sentence of up to 10 years in prison. However, the record does not contain a transcript of Beene’s plea colloquy to establish that he read and understood the plea form. The State concedes, and we agree, that a signed plea form is not alone sufficient to conclusively refute Beene’s claim. Townsend v. State, 927 So.2d 1064, 1066 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (<HOLDING>). We therefore reverse and remand the order
holding that plea colloquy did not refute defendants claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate his competency because defendants competency was never addressed at the plea colloquy holding a plea affidavit is properly incorporated in the record when the trial judge ascertains in the plea colloquy that the defendant has read has understood and acknowledges all the information contained therein holding that a signed plea form without a colloquy to establish that defendant read and understood the contents of the form was insufficient to conclusively refute defendants claim that he was not advised regarding the sentence to be imposed recognizing that plea colloquy demonstrated that the defendant understood his rights and voluntarily relinquished them holding that an enhancement in a future sentence based on the present conviction is a collateral consequence and need not be advised of by the district court in its plea colloquy