over § 1681a(d)’s more restrictive language. In other words, information that is collected and used for business transactions does not fall within the definition of a consumer report. But the mere fact that information is collected for a consumer purpose does not prevent that information from subsequently being furnished to a person who has a legitimate business need for the information. Ippolito, 864 F.2d at 451. The Sixth Circuit also observed that “[o]ur sister circuits have rebuffed efforts, based on expansive interpretations of § 1681b, to extend the Act beyond its original purpose of consumer protection.” Cheatham v. McCormick, 100 F.3d 956 (6th Cir.1996) (citing Mone, 945 F.2d at 308; Ippolito, 864 F.2d at 452; Matthews v. Worthen Bank & Trust Co., 741 F.2d 217 (8th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis in original)). And, while the
holding the real estate sale proceeds holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner holding witness not licensed as real estate appraiser could not testify as expert on real estate valuation where statute made it unlawful to engage in real estate appraisal without license holding that a credit report on a prospective lessee of commercial real estate was not subject to the act holding that a real estate brokers allegations of an oral contract with prospective purchasers stated a cause of action