1205 (8th Cir. 1990); Diversified Mortg. Inv. v. U. S. Life Title Ins. Co. of N.Y., 544 F2d 571, 574 n.2 (2d Cir. 1976). 11 First Am. Bank, 759 F3d at 433 (III) (punctuation omitted); see also Blackhawk Prod. Credit, 423 NW2d at 525. 12 164 Ga. App. 443 (296 SE2d 760) (1982). 13 See id. at 443-44 (noting that owner insisted on a title-insurance policy and sued for breach of same). 14 Blackhawk Prod. Credit, 423 NW2d at 525 (punctuation omitted). 15 Id. (emphasis added). 16 See OCGA § 44-14-60. 17 Nw. Carpets, Inc. v. First Nat. Bank of Chatsworth, 280 Ga. 535, 537 (1) (630 SE2d 407) (2006) (punctuation omitted); accord Trail v. Saunders, 296 Ga. App. 594, 595 (675 SE2d 514) (2009). 18 See Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Investguard, Ltd., 215 Ga. App. 121, 122-23 (1) (449 SE2d 681) (1994) (<HOLDING>). 19 See Aldworth Co., Inc. v. England, 281 Ga.
holding that there is no prejudice if an error had little likelihood of affecting the verdict holding that statutes of limitation although indirectly affecting court procedure primarily concerned a matter of public policy holding that for purposes of titleinsurance policy difference exists between economic lack of marketability which relates to physical conditions affecting use of property and title marketability which relates to defects affecting legally recognized rights and incidents of ownership holding that governments title to substitute property like subsection a property relates back to date of acts giving rise to forfeiture holding that the doctrine of stare decisis is most frequently applied in cases affecting real property