of his responsibility “to report the total amounts and sources of all income and net worth for you and your dependents for whom you have been awarded benefits,” and explained that “[s]ome income is not countable” in determining the rate of pension and that “[b]enefit rates and income limits change frequently; however, you can find out what the current income limitations and rates of benefits are by contacting VA.” Id. Mr. Dent does not assert that he did not receive a copy of VA Form 21-8768. See Reply Br. at 2. Although the enclosed VA Form 21-8768 is not in the record, reference to the form as an attachment to the cover letter from the RO that Mr. Dent received is sufficient indication that Mr. Dent received VA Form 21-8768. See Butler v. Principi, 244 F.3d 1337, 1339 (Fed.Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Upon receiving the Social Security benefits
holding that in connection with a motion to dismiss the court may consider a document not attached to the pleadings where the plaintiffs claim depends on the contents of a document the defendant attaches the document to its motion to dismiss and the parties do not dispute the authenticity of the document even though the plaintiff does not explicitly allege the contents of that document in the complaint holding that a bank customer was not bound to arbitrate where the signature card that was signed referenced a collateral document which contained an arbitration clause but the bank never sent the customer a copy of the collateral document holding that presumption of regularity justified courts conclusion that a document referenced in a packet sent to the veteran was included in the packet even though the document was not in the veterans claims file holding the separate document rule violated when the alleged judgment was included with the memorandum and order of the court holding that a court ruling on a motion to dismiss may consider a document that is referenced in the complaint and is central to the plaintiffs claims