responds that its claim is permitted by section 115B.06 because contamination from. Carney’s Walker site has continued to migrate to the adjacent Soo Line site since 1983. Hence, according to Soo Line,' some of the hazardous substances contaminating the Soo Line site were not placed and did not come to be located there wholly before July 1,1983. Although Soo Line’s argument is creative, it is unavailing. In City of Minneapolis v. Arkla, Inc., 1993 WL 61827, at *2 (D.Minn. February 18, 1993), the Court, in a decision by the Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, held, in eircuinstanees similar to the one presented here, that section 115B.06 bars claims where there are allegations of continuing migration of contaminants from one property to another after 1983. See also Werlein, 746 F.Supp. at 910 (<HOLDING>). This Court agrees with the Ark-la court’s
recognizing that section 1983 claims against a state agency are barred by the eleventh amendment holding claims relating to hazardous substances that were placed at a site prior to 1983 are barred despite the fact that these substances allegedly were being thrown into the air and settling elsewhere after 1983 holding that defendants were not in control and therefore were not supervisors and not subject to liability under  1983 holding that collateral estoppel applies to  1983 claims holding that claims under  1983 1985 and 1986 are barred for the further reason that these statutes create rights solely against persons and a state is not considered a person under these statutes