this nd n. 3 (545 SE2d 179) (2001) (citing numerous cases applying waiver to OCGA § 17-8-57 claims and noting that in State v. Griffin, 240 Ga. 470, 470 (241 SE2d 230) (1978), this Court had granted certiorari to reiterate that “[t]he question of whether [what is now OCGA § 17-8-57] has been violated is not reached [on appeal] unless an objection or motion for mistrial is made [at trial]”). In 2000, however, this Court, after recognizing that “we have repeatedly held that such an error [under OCGA § 17-8-57] is waived in the absence of an objection or a motion for a mistrial,” decreed that “[w]e believe the plain error rule should be applied to cases of this kind.” Paul v. State, 272 Ga. 845, 848 (537 SE2d 58) (2000). See also Ledford v. State, 289 Ga. 70, 85 (709 SE2d 239) (2011) (<HOLDING>); Archie, 248 Ga. App. at 57 (stating that Paul
holding that direct appeal from subsequent conviction is the proper context in which to seek review of trial courts ruling declaring mistrial over defendants objection at previous trial recognizing that a defendant may not raise one ground for objection at trial and argue a different ground on appeal recognizing that paul and subsequent cases had disapproved the prior cases holding that appellate review of an alleged ocga  17857 violation is waived unless an objection or motion for mistrial is made on that ground at trial holding that the plain error review provided for in ocga  17858 is waived where the defendant requested the charge in question and made no objection to the charge at trial holding to preserve an issue for appellate review the issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by trial court and a party may not argue one ground for objection at trial and another ground on appeal