the administrative record in a bid protest “should be supplemented only if the existing record is insufficient to permit meaningful review consistent with the APA.” Axiom Res. Mgmt., Inc. v. United States, 564 F.3d 1374, 1381 (Fed.Cir.2009). One of the basic reasons a record may be insufficient is when it is missing “relevant information that by its very nature would not be found in an agency record — such as evidence of bad faith, information relied upon but omitted from the paper record, or the content of conversations.” Orion Int’l, 60 Fed.Cl. at 343-44 (footnotes omitted). The first of these examples in particular calls for extra-record evidence to support requests for supplementation or discovery. See Beta Analytics Int’l, Inc. v. United States, 61 Fed.Cl. 223, 226 (2004) (<HOLDING>). But because of the presumptions of regularity
holding states may not ban truthful advertisements concerning the availability and terms of routine legal services but also noting that some limited supplementation by way of warning or disclaimer or the like might be required  so as to assure the consumer is not misled recognizing that otherwise record supplementation will be insensibly limited to eases involving officials who are both sinister and stupid recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1 holding when both real property and contract rights are assigned assignee must both record under the real estate laws and file pursuant to article 9 holding appeal of termination is limited to information that is part of the record