result from the plea. We conclude that the United States Supreme Court’s Opinion in Padilla did not recognize a new “constitutional right” as envisioned by our Legislature in enacting Subsection 9545(b)(1)(iii). Rather, Padilla clarified and refined the scope of a criminal defendant’s long-standing constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel during the guilty plea process. See Commonwealth v. Abraham, 996 A.2d 1090, 1092-1093 (Pa.Super.2010), appeal granted in part, 607 Pa. 618, 9 A.3d 1133 (2010) (“Padilla harkens back to the original Strickland concept, adopted by our Supreme Court in Pierce, of examining the totality of the circumstances to determine what advice must be given to have a fully informed guilty plea.”); Commonwealth v. Lynch, 820 A.2d 728 (Pa.Super.2003) (<HOLDING>); Commonwealth v. Hickman, 799 A.2d 136
holding the sixth amendment guarantees the effective assistance of counsel at all stages of a criminal proceeding including during the plea process holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel holding a criminal defendant has the right to effective assistance of counsel during a plea process recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel