a plaintiffs Mo-nell claims on the same basis: [F]ar from asserting that the misconduct in this case was widespread, Young has not alleged any facts — such as statistics, records of complaints filed with the city, or even anecdotal evidence — that would indicate that the misconduct alleged in this case was more than an isolated incident. In fact, Young cannot point to another instance in which a City of Albuquerque employee has deprived another individual of his or her property rights without due process. A single incident is insufficient to establish the existence of a custom or practice. See City of St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. at 127, 108 S.Ct. 915 (explaining that a custom requires that the alleged misconduct is “widespread” — ie., involving a “series of d 1304 (5th Cir.1995)(<HOLDING>). Other .courts require only that the plaintiff
holding that two incidents of alleged excessive force are insufficient to show policy or custom holding that a dozen racial incidents over a two and one half year period were too few to constitute a custom with the force of law holding that inquiry as to whether officers are entitled to qualified immunity for use of excessive force is distinct from inquiry on the merits of the excessive force claim holding that excessive force claims are to be treated under the fourth amendment holding that excessive force claims are not subject to exhaustion requirement