Without Pay (“LWOP”) on May 18. The administrative judge found that Alston had been constructively suspended and, therefore, that the board had jurisdiction over her claims. The full board reversed, fin , 993 F.2d 219, 221 (Fed.Cir. 1993) (explaining that Pittman v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 832 F.2d 598 (Fed.Cir.1987), applies only to employees who are placed on enforced leave without pay pending receipt of medical documentation). Alston’s absence after May 18, when she was placed on LWOP, likewise fails to qualify as a constructive suspension. Alston herself was responsible for failing to provide the necessary medical documentation and, therefore, is considered to have initiated this period of unpaid leave. See Perez v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 931 F.2d 853, 855 (Fed.Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). DYK, Circuit Judge. I concur in the result
holding loss was caused by an employee who ignored bank policies by instructing subordinates to cash corporate checks without proper documentation holding that an employer is not financially responsible for medical and surgical treatment obtained by an employee for conditions unrelated to an accident arising out of and in the course of the employees employment recognizing absolute immunity for attorneys and board members of the texas medical board holding that an appeal to an agency review board would be futile because the board lacked authority to invalidate ordinance as requested holding that an employee who fails to provide medical documentation requested by the board is responsible for initiating a subsequent suspension without pay