that “the claimed solution is necessarily rooted in computer technology in order to overcome a problem specifically arising in the realm of computer networks.” Id. Hence, DDR and Bascom stand for the principle that when claims relating to an abstract idea address a specific Internet-centric problem and do not unduly preempt other solutions to that problem, they likely satisfy the “inventive concept” requirement embodied by step two of the Alice/Mayo test. Id. at 1259. The line between computer-centric problems and commonplace business problems is often blurred in the context of Internet commerce. Nonetheless, courts have definitively stated that an otherwise abstract idea is not rendered patent-eligible by reciting general purpose technological components. Alice, 134 S.Ct. at 2357 (<HOLDING>); see also Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, 772
holding that by its terms the idea does not require exhaustion where the relief sought is unavailable in an administrative proceeding under the idea monetary damages are not available so exhaustion is not required holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea holding that the introduction of a computer into the claims does not render the idea patenteligible recognizing that idea is simply not an antidiscrimination statute so that pure discrimination claim was not barred by parents failure to exhaust remedies under idea holding that wellunderstood routine conventional activities are insufficient to transform an abstract idea into a patenteligible application