stressed, as to a claim involving a private right. Granfinanciera, 492 U.S. at 54-55, 109 S.Ct. at 2797. In the present case, as in Granfinanciera, the action to recover a preference seeks only legal relief, in the form of money damages. Further, Growers Packing has not filed a claim against the bankruptcy estate. In addition, the claim does not appear to involve a public right, but rather stems from an underlying breach of contract dispute involving a private right. Accordingly, the Court concludes that the Seventh Amendment guarantees the right to a jury trial on this claim, even though a proceeding to recover a preference is deemed “core” under the Bankruptcy Code. See also Friedman v. Gold Advice, Inc. (In re Fort Lauderdale Hotel Partners, Ltd.), 103 B.R. 335 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1989) (<HOLDING>). Cf. In re Sunco, Inc., 113 B.R. 764
holding that declaratory judgment requiring party to pay a specific sum of money is properly characterized as a money judgment holding that preferential transfer claim was not entitled to jury trial but without any discussion of nature of relief sought or whether a claim against the bankruptcy estate had been filed holding preference claim legal in nature where relief sought was for a definite sum of money holding that where plaintiff sought only equitable relief up through the end of trial and only added claim for legal relief posttrial defendant was entitled to demand jury once legal claim was asserted holding that the eleventh amendment applies regardless of the nature of the relief sought