L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Harris was notified of his right to file a supplemental brief and responded with a letter reiterating counsel’s arguments. The district court sentenced Harris to a 188 month term of imprisonment to run concurrently on both counts based upon its findings that he distributed a total of 27.6 grams of cocaine base. Harris claims the failure of the district court to treat the drug quantities as an element of the offense to be presented to the jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt violated Apprendi We find Harris’ reliance on Apprendi is misplaced. Harris’ sentence of 188 months does not exceed the 240 month maximum in § 841(b)(1)(C) for an “identifiable but unspecified quantity” of cocaine base. See United States v. Promise, 255 F.3d 150, 156 (4th Cir.2001) (en bane) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Angle, 254 F.3d 514, 518
holding that where the indictment charged drug quantity but drug quantity was not submitted to the jury the district court erred in using drug quantity to increase the penalty beyond the twentyyear maximum of  841b1c holding any fact other than prior conviction that increases statutory mandatory minimum is element of offense that must be submitted to jury and found beyond reasonable doubt holding that statutory maximum is twenty years when drug quantity is not charged as element of offense and found by jury beyond a reasonable doubt holding that apprendi dictates that in order to authorize the imposition of a sentence exceeding the maximum allowable without a jury finding of a specific threshold drug quantity the specific threshold quantity must be treated as an element of an aggregated drug trafficking offense ie charged in the indictment and proved to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt internal footnote omitted holding that postapprendi drug quantity is an element of the offense to be proven to jury