a remand or to respond to any request for a remand that any other party to the appeal may present to the court. In addition, § 4(d) of the act essentially transferred to the commission all complaints pending before the former commission for which it had closed the record in a formal hearing but had not yet rendered a final judgment as of the effective date of the act. Here, the former commission had “completed and formally closed the record in a formal hearing on the said complaint” prior to the act’s effective date. Id. Nonetheless, because of petitioner’s pending Superior Court appeal, the former commission had not yet rendered a final judgment on the complaint against petitioner. See Welsh Manufacturing, Division of Textron, Inc. v. Pinkerton’s Inc., 494 A.2d 897, 898 (R.I.1985) (<HOLDING>). As a result, § 4(d) authorized the commission
holding that a judgment is final only when the parties have exhausted their respective rights to appeal or if no party to the action filed a timely appeal holding that an appeal is perfected when the appeal bond is filed holding that notice of appeal was not effectively taken where appeal was filed simultaneously with timely motion for reconsideration because when timely motion for reconsideration is filed a notice of appeal filed prior to disposition of the motion to reconsider has no effect holding a ruling on a motion for summary judgment adjudicating the rights of a party is a final judgment subject to appeal holding that a notice of appeal is timely when filed before final judgment is entered by the district court