Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors law into conformity with the United States Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532. For more than fifty years, it has been settled law in bankruptcy that only a bankruptcy trustee has standing to bring derivative claims. See, e.g., In re Gen. Dev. Corp., 179 B.R. 335 (S.D.Fla.1995) (finding derivative claims are among the assets of an estate, which only the trustee has standing to prosecute). The same rule applies to preferential and fraudulent transfers. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 547(b), 548(a); In re Curry & Sorensen, Inc., 57 B.R. 824, 828-29 (B.A.P. 9th Cir.1986) ("An action to set aside a fraudulent transfer must be brought in the name of the bankruptcy estate as the real party in interest.”); In re Fritz, 88 B.R. 434, 435 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1988) (<HOLDING>); In re Davidson Lumber, 19 B.R. 871
holding that the bankruptcy code endows the bankruptcy trustee with the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate holding that the question of whether an interest is a claim for bankruptcy purposes is to be resolved by reference to the text history and purpose of the bankruptcy code holding pursuant to 11 usc sections 544b and 548a of the bankruptcy code a fraudulent transfer claim is available only to a bankruptcy trustee not to a creditor holding a bankruptcy court is empowered to reopen a bankruptcy case on its own motion under 11 usc  105a holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added