jury to render a verdict. Tex.R. Civ. P. 278. “A reviewing court may reverse and remand for a new trial based on an alleged error in a jury charge only if such error Vas reasonably calculated and probably did cause rendition of an improper judgment.’ ” Providence Health Center v. Dowell, 262 S.W.3d 324, 331 (Tex.2008)(Wainwright, J., concurring) (quoting Island Recreational Dev. Corp. v. Republic of Tex. Sav. Ass’n, 710 S.W.2d 551, 555 (Tex.1986)); see also Shupe v. Lingafelter, 192 S.W.3d 577, 579 (Tex.2006)(citing Tex.R.App. P. 61.1(a) & 44.1(a)); Sterling Trust Co. v. Adderley, 168 S.W.3d 835, 843 (Tex.2005); Reinhart v. Young, 906 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Tex.1995). As a general rule, a person has no legal duty to control the conduct of another. Providence Health Center, 262 S.W.3d at 331 (<HOLDING>); Walker v. Harris, 924 S.W.2d 375, 377
holding that evidence was sufficient to support trial courts best interest finding where mother allowed child to be in contact with individual who had physically abused her mother was not capable of caring for child on her own mother admitted at trial she had not found stable employment and child was doing well in her current placement holding even though mother was a nurse she had no legal duty to prevent her 21yearold sons suicide holding that claim for sons suicide was not actionable holding that while a mother could consent to a search of her sons room she did not have authority to consent to a search of a locked footlocker within the room holding that a nurse practitioners opinion constituted an acceptable medical source where the nurse worked closely under the supervision of the doctor such that the nurse was acting as an agent of the doctor