State, 168 Md.App. 504, 521-22, 897 A.2d 296 (2006) (applying the factors to possession of child pornography); Samuels v. State, 54 Md.App. 486, 495, 459 A.2d 213 (1983) (applying the analysis to possession of stolen goods). In McDonald v. State, 141 Md.App. 371, 785 A.2d 836 (2001), we addressed the issue of constructive possession of a handgun. Quoting Price v. State, 111 Md.App. 487, 499, 681 A.2d 1206 (1996), we recognized that “ ‘the proximity between the defendant and the contraband and the fact that the contraband was within the view ... of t 90), cert. denied, 321 Md. 502, 583 A.2d 276 (1991), a case concerning the constructive possession of narcotics, is particularly analogous to the case sub judice. On appeal, Martin Coo Archie v. State, 161 Md.App. 226, 247, 867 A.2d 1120 (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 387 Md. 462, 875 A.2d 767
holding that if the site where the contraband is found is in joint rather than exclusive possession a defendants knowledge of the contrabands presence and his ability to control it cannot be inferred merely from the defendants proximity to the contraband holding that officers had probable cause to arrest driver and two passengers where cocaine and contraband were found in glove compartment and backseat armrest of vehicle and none of the men offered any information regarding the ownership of the drugs and contraband on the ground that the drugs and contraband could have been in the possession of any one of the three vehicle occupants or all three of them jointly holding evidence was sufficient to support conviction for pfdcf where defendant was arrested immediately outside his residence and an unloaded handgun was found in the residence under the defendants bed and in the same room as the controlled substances and cash holding that circumstance that contraband was found in a box bearing defendants name was sufficient to support an inference of knowledge and dominion and control holding the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the defendant possessed contraband found in the kitchen of a residence where the defendant was found in the nearby bathroom attempting to dispose of contraband down the toilet