the district court to enter default judgment against the defendants in her case. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1651, this court may only “issue writs necessary or appropriate in aid of [its] jurisdiction[ ].” Power to issue writs of mandamus depends on power to entertain appeals when the case ends. In re BBC Int’l, Ltd., 99 F.3d 811, 813 (7th Cir.1996). Any appeal from a final decision of the district court in this employment discrimination matter under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 will go to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Because the Third Circuit rather than this court will have jurisdiction to entertain any appeal, we also lack jurisdiction over this petition. We therefore transfer the matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. See generally BBC, 99 F.3d at 813 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, It Is Ordered That: The petition
holding that a court of appeals may transfer petitions for writ of mandamus to the court of proper jurisdiction pursuant to  1631 recognizing that the issuance of a writ of mandamus is itself generally a matter of discretion holding that to grant a writ of mandamus a court in the exercise of its discretion must be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances recognizing that laches is a proper ground for refusing to issue a writ of mandamus holding that where a superior court judge was named a defendant in an action for a writ of mandamus the prosecuting attorney is the proper court representative of the superior court judge