at 565 (inquiry notice as a form of constructive notice). Inquiry notice follows from the duty of a purchaser, when he has actual or constructive knowledge of facts which would lead a prudent person to suspect that another person might have an interest in the property, to conduct a further investigation into the facts. The most common type of “inquiry notice” is present when some person other than the grant- or is in actual possession of the property. In that situation, the purchaser is charged with constructive knowledge of this possession; as a result, the purchaser is “on inquiry” to determine whether the possessor has some interest in the property. See 4 American Law of Property § 17.12; 5 Tiffany’s Real Property § 1287. See also McCannon v. Marston, 679 F.2d 13 (3d Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>); In re Probasco, 839 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir.1988)
holding that a bankruptcy appellate panel abuses its discretion by preventing a bankruptcy trustee from reopening a chapter 7 bankruptcy proceeding when reopening the case would potentially benefit creditors holding that the bankruptcy code endows the bankruptcy trustee with the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee holding a bankruptcy trustee to constructiveinquiry notice holding that bankruptcy discharge eliminates only a debtors personal liability and not the debt itself and that a bankruptcy trustee stands in the shoes of the debtor and can bring a legal malpractice claim as trustee