and internal quotations omitted)). Here, at the time the parties entered into the 2012 Agreed Stipulation to resolve the Stepfather contact issue, they also each had a motion to modify parenting time pending before the trial court. The 2012 Agreed Stipulation did not contain any provision regarding attorney fees but noted that all pending matters were scheduled for a future hearing. The trial court entered an order approving the parties' 2012 Agreed Stipulation, but that order was not a final judgment because there were still matters pending before the trial court and because it did not dispose of all issues. Accordingly, claim preclusion does not apply because the 2012 Stipulated Agreement was not a final judgment. See, e.g., Pond v. MceNellis, 845 N.E.2d 1043, 1054 (Ind.Ct.App.2006) (<HOLDING>), trans. denied. Thus, the attorney fee issue
holding that res judicata did not apply where a trial courts order was not a final judgment holding that because trial courts order did not dispose of the defendants counterclaim that order was not a final judgment that would support an appeal holding that a bankruptcy courts sale order is a final order for res judicata purposes holding that an unappealed contempt order by a bankruptcy court is a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes holding that an unappealed order is a final judgment on the merits for res judicata purposes