11. Barnes was properly advised of his rights, the offense charged, and the maximum sentence for the offense. The court also determined that there was an independent factual basis for the plea and that the plea was not coerced or influenced by promises. See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 31, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970); United States v. DeFusco, 949 F.2d 114, 116-20 (4th Cir.1991). We find the district court properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines and considered the relevant factors before imposing the three-year probationary term. 18 U.S.C.A. § 3553(a) (West 2000 & Supp. 2006); see United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir.2005). Additionally, we find that the sentence imposed was reasonable. See United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2309, 164
holding that a sentence within the properly calculated guideline range is presumptively reasonable holding that the defendants sentence was within the guidelines range and therefore presumptively reasonable holding a sentence within the advisory guidelines range is presumptively reasonable holding that sentences within the guideline range are presumptively reasonable holding that when a court miscalculates the guideline range yet imposes a sentence that falls within a properly calculated guideline range the sentence enjoys a presumption of reasonableness