initiation of a prosecution is a decision that is “intimately associated with the judicial phase of the criminal process,” and Luna is absolutely immune from liability arising out of that decision. Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409, 430-31, 96 S.Ct. 984, 47 L.Ed.2d 128 (1976). The Vos’ generalized objections to inspecting the property on October 27 do not raise a genuine issue of material fact in light of specific declarations by Captain Cooper, Lieutenant To, and Inspector Weikel that Nguyen consented to inspection of the property. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)(2) (“[A]n opposing party may not rely merely on allegations or denials ...; rather, its response must ... set out specific facts showing a genuine issue for trial.”); 389 Orange St. Partners v. Arnold, 179 F.3d 656, 664 (9th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). Neither does the fact that Alexandrou did not
holding that the mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for summary judgment the requirement is that there be no genuine issue of material fact recognizing that nonmoving party must present affirmative evidence  to defeat summary judgment holding that the judge cannot consider factual statements of counsel in a motion for summary judgment holding that a nonmoving party cannot defeat a motion for summary judgment by relying on conclusory statements holding that vague claims cannot generate a factual dispute adequate to defeat summary judgment