that phrase and conclude that Congress really intended to include within the definition of 'student' a person who has not been in attendance at an institution." We respectfully disagree. Whether the attendance spoken of in the statute is one that has occurred in the past or is presently occurring when the request for records is made is not unambiguously addressed by the statute. However, it is addressed by the Secretary of the Department of Education, who was designated by Congress to implement the Act. 8 Under 34 C.F.R. § 99.1, an "educational agency" is included within FERPA if it "provides educational services" or "performs service functions for, public elementary, or secondary schools or post secondary institutions." This definition is broad enough to extend to the entiti k. 1991) (<HOLDING>); Lawson v. Edwardsburg Pub. Sch., No.
holding that seventeen missing records does not constitute improper record keeping because the fact that the records are not at the station does not mean that the records are incorrect or inaccurate holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal holding that a person who requests public records is a necessary party and must be joined in any action brought under rcw 4256540 holding that records relating to a student court were not education records holding that requests for records of another must be denied and relying on the dicta in tarka without even mentioning the cfr