characters repay money to those from whom they stole, and at some point, both men get a job. These storylines are driven by the basic plot idea of turning one’s life around. The concept of a bad person spending time in prison, and then trying to clean up their act by making restitution and getting a job are unprotectable scenes-a-faire in a story about redemption. See, e.g., Walker v. Time Life Films, Inc., 784 F.2d 44, 50 (2d Cir.1986) (In two works depicting the experience of policemen in New York’s crime-laden 41st Precinct, scenes of a policeman murdered at close range, cockfights, drunks, stripped cars, prostitute, rats, unsuccessful foot chases of fleeing criminals, and demoralized officers were stock scenes commonly linked to the genre of the works); Berkic, 761 F.2d at 1293 (<HOLDING>). Similarly, Plaintiff points out that in both
holding that the department of transportation may be enjoined from diverting water flow onto a landowners property holding that if a witness appears to know of the charges and would naturally be expected to have come forward with the alibi testimony the witness may be crossexamined about those circumstances of nondisclosure holding that the protection afforded by the eleventh amendment extends not only to the states themselves but also to their instrumentalities and government officials acting in that capacity holding that no protection may be afforded to situations and incidents which flow naturally from a basic plot premise holding no joint employer status despite some isolated incidents of supervision