this Court alluded to the holding in McLean, but did not have occasion to apply it. In Jenkins, the issue was whether the debtor’s Michigan unemployment benefits were property of the state pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). This Court held that the unemployment benefits were includable in the property of the debtor’s Chapter 13 estate but noted that the appellant failed to argue that the unemployment benefits received by the debtor were an excludable interest in a state law spendthrift trust. This Court specifically noted: Paragraph (2) of § 541 provides a limited exception for restrictions ‘on the transfer of a beneficial interest of the debtor in a trust that is enforceable under applicable nonbankruptcy law ...’. 11 U.S.C. § 541(c)(2); see McLean, 762 F.2d at 1206-07 (<HOLDING>). Appellant has not attempted to argue,
holding lost pension benefits recoverable as front pay holding that an antiassignment clause in a pension plan is valid under  541c2 and that the pension benefits thus do not become property of the estate and may not be made subject to a pay order under section 1325c holding that an employees protected interest in a pension vested before he or she became eligible to collect the pension holding that the defendant withheld pension benefits in breach of the plan holding that appropriate remedy was to compute service credit for veterans in accordance with vrra rather than pursuant to employers pension plan and requiring retroactive pension plan payments to be made