of the evidence itself ought to have put an opposing party on notice that an unanticipated claim is being presented to the Court. But where the circumstances fail to provide that notice, Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7015(b) is unavailing. In light of the foregoing, this Court will reinstate its judgment in favor of the Defendants in conformance hereto. JUDGMENT For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Memorandum of Decision of even date, this Court reinstates its judgment in favor of the Defendants. 1 . Mass. Gen. Laws, Ch. 109A, § 6 provides: (a) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation w (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1988)
holding that the trial court properly struck the amended complaint when the plaintiff offered no reason to refute the trial courts finding that the new allegations in the amended complaint were based on facts the plaintiff had known since the beginning of the action holding that a trial court entered judgment on the pleadings where the decision did not depend on any document outside the pleadings holding that pleadings could not be amended where no evidence offered during trial was outside the issues in the original complaint holding that the amended complaint could not relate back to the original complaint in which all claims were barred by the statute of limitations holding that a demand for jury trial should be denied if the issues in the original complaint and the amended complaint turn on the same matrix of facts