in furthering its purpose.” Id. Except for certain enumerated exceptions, the Rules of Arbitration apply to “[a]ll civil actions filed in the Superior Court in which there is a claim or there are claims for monetary relief not exceeding $100,000 total, exclusive of interest, costs and attorneys’ fees.” (Emphasis added.) Super.R.Arb. 1(a). We are of the opinion that neither the Rules of Arbitration nor the policy of moving disputes more efficiently through the judicial system restricts the trial justice’s discretionary powers to permit late filing of a notice of rejection upon a showing of excusable neglect under Rule 6 or Rule 60 of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure. See Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange v. Gavin, 416 Mich. 407, 423, 381 N.W.2d 418, 425-26 (1982) (<HOLDING>). Consequently, we hold that the Rules of
holding that although administrative agency has inherent power to correct decisions this power is curtailed by statutory language providing specified period of time when agency decision becomes final holding that michigans arbitration rule with a twentyday deadline did not mandate that the trial justices discretionary power to permit a party to plead beyond established time limits upon a showing of excusable neglect    is or should be curtailed holding that misplacing the notice of an appealable order was not excusable neglect holding that the misinterpretation of rule 6e did not rise to the level of excusable neglect where the plaintiffappellee believed he had three additional days to file a motion for a new trial because the courts judgment was served by mail holding that any default entered in violation of the due process notice requirement of rule 1500  fla r civ p must be set aside without any regard as to whether a meritorious defense is presented or excusable neglect is established