throughout the entire period of his service” are sufficient, if proven, as defense to employee’s claim to share of profits due); Abramson, 166 N.Y.S. at 773 (allegations that employee persuaded defendant's other employees to leave defendant’s employ, and tried to lure defendant’s customers away are sufficient, if proven, to state defense to action by employee for bonus); Pictorial Films v. Salzburg, 106 N.Y.S.2d 626, 629 (Sup.Ct.N.Y.Co.1951) (forfeiture of profits appropriate where jury found that agents had fraudulently removed from employer’s files employer's contract with another corporation, and had secretly appropriated employer's royalty checks due pursuant to that contract); cf. Bon Temps Agency, Ltd. v. Greenfield, 212 A.D.2d 427, 622 N.Y.S.2d 709, 710 (1st Dep’t 1995) (<HOLDING>). 13 . See Schwartz v. Leonard, 138 A.D.2d 692,
holding commissions review of appellants termination was an action of quasijudicial character holding employee not terminated in bad faith because no evidence suggested that employer discharged employee in order to retain em ployees previously earned sales commissions recognizing a contract action when employee terminated in order not to receive earned bonuses or commissions holding that forfeiture of all commissions earned after first disloyal act would be appropriate if employer could establish that two instances of secretly receiving commissions were not isolated or that employees activities in establishing a competing company went beyond mere preliminary steps and rose to the level of actual competition holding employment security commissions findings of fact that an employee was discharged without cause would not be given preclusive effect on the basis of collateral estoppel in employees subsequent civil action against employer for wrongful termination