employment is for an indefinite term and would otherwise be terminable at will.” 99 N.J. at 285-86, 491 A.2d 1257. In the companion case, Witkowski, supra, 136 N.J. 385, 643 A.2d 546, we revisited the standards for determining whether an employment manual constitutes a contract of employment. We noted: In sum, under Woolley, the basic test for determining whether a contract of employment can be implied turns on the reasonable expectations of employees. A number of factors bear on whether an employee may reasonably understand that an employment manual is intended to provide enforceable employment obligations, including the definiteness and comprehensiveness of the termination policy and the context of the manual’s preparation and distribution. [13 er. 81, 86, 555 A.2d 12 (App.Div.1989) (<HOLDING>). In fact, because approximately 1,500 of
holding social security administration claims manual is not binding agency rule holding employee manual binding based in part on its widespread distribution holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties holding enforceable employee manual that was distributed to all employees holding an employee manual did not create contract restricting the employmentatwill relationship