56 . Although the two foot excess groundwater level condition found by the court is based on only seven points on the construction site (at which March 1984 levels and actually encountered levels were recorded), the court believes, based on the other evidence presented, that these seven points are representative of the high groundwater level conditions across the site. 57 . The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has held that a one to 1.5 foot difference in groundwater levels between the levels encountered and the levels indicated in a document given to bidders was material and constituted a changed condition. Johnson, Drake and Piper, Inc., ASBCA Nos. 9824 and 10199, 65-2 BCA ¶ 4868, at 23,071-72; see also Peter Reiss Constr. Co., ASBCA No. 9801, 66-1 BCA ¶ 5598, at 26, 153 (<HOLDING>); Beacon Constr. Co., ASBCA No. 7675, 1963 BCA
holding that article x  2 of the california constitution dictates the basic principles defining water rights that no one can have a protectible interest in the unreasonable use of water and that holders of water rights must use water reasonably and beneficially holding that village could not condition provision of water services on annexation where prospective customer was within a rural water associations service area and the water association was federally indebted holding that a three foot rise in the water level was a material difference and constituted a changed condition holding a transfer or reassignment may rise to the level of an adverse employment condition if it is a significant change in working conditions holding that transfer involving no reduction in pay and only a minor change in working conditions does not rise to the level of a material adverse employment action