the post-expiration action "infringes a right that accrued or vested under the agreement.” CPR (USA) Inc. v. Spray, 187 F.3d 245, 255 (2d Cir.1999). If it were determined that plaintiffs' claims amounted to allegations that defendants infringed rights contained in the contract, then the arbitration clause would apply beyond the expiration of the contract. 10 . The phrase "arising from” appears on its face to be less broad than other possible arbitration agreement language. For example, the Court of Appeals has stated that the "paradigm of a broad [arbitration] clause” is one that submits to arbitration "any claim or controversy arising out of or relating to the agreement.” Collins & Aikman Prods. Co. v. Building Sys., 58 F.3d 16, 20 (2d Cir.1995). See also ACE Capital, 307 F.3d at 26 (<HOLDING>); Oldroyd v. Elmira Sav. Bank, 134 F.3d 72, 76
holding in light of the presumption in favor of arbitrability that broad language referring to any dispute encompassed any disputes between the parties past or present holding that a clause requiring arbitration of any controversy or claim that shall arise out of this agreement or the breach thereof was sufficiently broad to cover a 1934 securities act claim involving fraudulent misrepresentation holding that the clause any dispute that shall arise between the parties  with reference to the interpretation of this agreement or their rights with respect to any transaction involved was broad holding that a clause covering any controversy or claim  related directly or indirectly to this agreement was a broad arbitration clause holding that a clause requiring arbitration wjhenever any question or dispute shall arise or occur under this agreementcontract was sufficiently broad to cover a claim of fraudulent inducement