City of Los Angeles v. County of Kern, 581 F.3d 841, 847-48 (9th Cir.2009). In County of Kern, a waste-disposal company wanted to ship waste inside its home State but was discouraged from doing so by a statute that made it more expensive. The court held that the company did not have standing even though the increased cost would force it to ship waste out of state. Id. Only the harm (having to ship to out-of-state waste disposal sites), and not the interest (maintaining its in-state shipment), was out of state. In order for the company to have mercial interests that are burdened by the challenged regulations. County of Kern, 581 F.3d at 847-48; Pine Belt, 389 F.3d at 501; see also Boston Stock Exch. v. State Tax Comm’n, 429 U.S. 318, 321 n. 3, 97 S.Ct. 599, 50 L.Ed.2d 514 (1977) (<HOLDING>). This it has done. It pled that it operates in
holding that state restrictions on electronic license plates might constitute an undue burden on interstate commerce so the claim fell within the zone of interests protected by the dormant commerce clause holding that stock exchanges asserting their rights to engage in interstate commerce free of discriminatory taxes are within the zone of interests protected by the commerce clause holding that commerce clause authorizes congress to punish any particular criminal action even without proof of a relation to interstate commerce when the activity is part of a class of activities determined by congress to affect interstate commerce recognizing power of states to engage in some regulation of interstate commerce holding that statute which prohibited gun possession near a school zone exceeded congresss authority under the commerce clause because the statute did not regulate activity that had a substantial effect on interstate commerce