retail installment sales contract for eight vehicles nonexecutory where debtor’s only obligation was payment and creditor’s only obligation concerned limited repair warranty); Riggs Nat. Bank of Wash., D.C. v. Perry (In re Perry), 25 B.R. 817, 819-20 (Bankr.D.Md.1982) (finding installment sales contracts for vehicles not executory within meaning of § 365); Brock v. Am. Sec. Bank (In re Brock), 23 B.R. 998, 1002 n. 8 (Bankr.D.D.C.1982) (noting, without deciding, that installment sales contract for vehicle purchase “would not ordinarily be deemed an executory contract simply because the sole and remaining obligation under the contract is that of the debtor to maintain periodic contractual payments called for in the contract itself’); In re Whatley, 16 B.R. 394, 398 (Bankr.N.D.Ohio 1982) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the nonexe-cutory
holding the beginning of a creditors action to subject an equitable estate to the payment of a judgment gives a specific lien upon the property which it is sought to reach and this lien continues while the cause is pending holding a lien is a claim against property  here a surety bond and breach of contract is a claim against a person thus the lien proceeding did not dispose of the breach of contract action holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond holding creditors obligation to cancel lien not sufficient to make the contract executo ry holding that insurance obligation was primary to indemnity obligation