the Fourth Circuit, a court must (i) determine the primary issue in controversy in the litigation, and (ii) align the parties with respect to this primary issue. See United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. A & S Mfg., 48 F.3d 131, 133 (4th Cir.1995). The next relevant principle is that a claim asserted by a stockholder in a stockholder derivative suit is not her own; instead, the claim be inciple is that corporations are typically aligned as plaintiffs in stockholder derivative actions, since they stand to benefit from a successful suit. See, e.g., Reilly, 568 F.Supp. at 1073 (citations omitted). Yet, a well-settled exception to this general rule applies when a corporation is under a control “antagonistic” to the stockholder plaintiffs rights. See Koster, 330 U.S. at 523, 67 S.Ct. 828 (<HOLDING>) (citing Doctor v. Harrington, 196 U.S. 579, 25
holding that a shareholder who disposes of his shares loses standing to bring a derivative action no longer a shareholder in the corporation the defendant cannot maintain a derivative action on its behalf holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation recognizing that the corporation is always deemed to be an indispensable party in a shareholder derivative action recognizing that in a derivative action the corporation for whose benefit suit is brought is a necessary party to the action recognizing that a corporation is properly aligned as a defendant in a shareholder derivative suit when the corporation is in antagonistic hands