of goods and services, the monopolistic tendency of which had become a matter of public concern. The end sought (by these laws) was the prevention of the restraints to the competition in business and commercial transactions which tended to restrict production, raise prices or otherwise control the market to the detriment of purchasers or consumers of goods and services, all of which had come to be regarded as a special form of public injury. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 310 U.S. 469, 492-93, 60 S.Ct. 982, 992, 84 L.Ed. 1311 (1940). The Court also has noted that “in Apex [it] recognized that the Act is aimed primarily at combinations having commercial objectives and is appli ional Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 1975-1 Trade Cas. (CCH) ¶ 60,117, available in 1974 WL 998, *2, *3 (D.N.J.1974) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 506 F.2d 1050 (3d Cir.1974) (table).
holding that as a general rule the prosecution is entitled to prove its case by evidence of its own choice holding that the failure of the parties to follow the adoption provisions in any material respect deprives the court of the power to decree an adoption recognizing union members vital concern in preserving jobs for union members holding that the ncaas adoption of a rule furthering its noncommercial objectives such as preserving the educational standards of its members is not within the purview of antitrust law holding that the breach occurs when the union acts against the interest of its members