N.E.2d 816 (2011) (“[T]he decisions in Heller and McDonald were limited to interpreting the [Sjecond [Ajmendment’s protection of the right to possess handguns in the home, not the right to possess handguns outside the home.”); People v. Dawson, 403 Ill.App.3d 499, 508, 343 Ill.Dec. 274, 934 N.E.2d 598 (2010) (“[T]he Heller Court ultimately limited its holding to the question presented — that the [Sjecond [Ajmendment right to bear arms protected the right to possess a commonly used firearm, in the home for self-defense purposes.”); Williams v. State, 417 Md. 479, 10 A.3d 1167, 1178 (2011) (“If the Supreme Court ... meant its holding [in Heller and McDonald] to extend beyond home possession, it will need to say so more plainly.”); Little v. United States, 989 A.2d 1096, 1101 (D.C.2010) (<HOLDING>); Mack v. United States, 6 A.3d 1224, 1236
holding that defendant was not in custody during search of his residence recognizing that a protective search of a residence may be justified when the defendant is arrested outside of the home holding that in a prosecution for possession of an unregistered firearm evidence of an armed robbery committed with the firearm was admissible holding that because the appellant was not in his home he was outside of the bounds identified in heller ie the possession of a firearm in ones private residence for selfdefense purposes holding that residence in the cnmi before 2009 was not residence in the united states for naturalization purposes