(six times per day), the disputes regarding the other two factors are sufficient to preclude a holding on this issue at this time. C. Meal/Rest Breaks Equity has moved for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claim that they are entitled to compensation for the two unpaid thirty-minute “meal/rest breaks” required by Equity each shift. Equity argues these periods are properly excluded pursuant to §§ 203(o) and 254(a). However, by their terms these sections do not apply to .activities performed during the continuous work day. See 29 U.S.C. § 203(o) (limiting exclusion to activities performed “at the beginning or end of each workday”), § 254(a) (limiting exclusion to activities prior to the first principal activity or subsequent to the last); see also Alvarez, 546 U.S. at 37, 126 S.Ct. 514 (<HOLDING>). The Secretary of Labor has promulgated two
holding that questioning of a juvenile by a principal in presence of a police officer did not constitute an interrogation because principal was sole questioner and was not acting as an agent for police holding that a principal is bound by a contract entered into by the principals agent on her behalf if the agent had authority to bind the principal holding that agency relationship existed where principal paid plaintiff directly and written agreement stated agent was signing on behalf of principal holding that walking time performed after an employee performs the first principal activity and before the end of the last principal activity is not excluded by  254 holding that where the first amendment does not protect a certain activity there can be no first amendment right of association to engage in that activity