did not abuse its discretion in denying Ellis’s request to admit the whole of his videotaped interview The trial court denied Ellis’s request to admit the whole of his videotaped interview first because Ellis- did not confess during the interview. Though Ellis did not confess to wrongdoing during the interview, he did make admissions, as he placed himself with Y.W. in the shower at the same time (though under different circumstances than those testified to by V.W.), and as he admitted to unintended contact with V.W.’s vaginal area while teaching V.W. how to bathe. See Collier, 892 S.W.2d at 695 (noting that defendant’s statement placing himself at the scene of a murder, though not a confession, was an admission). The rule of completeness applies to both confessions and admissions. Id. (<HOLDING>). The trial court committed legal error when it
holding that the admission of evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding that statement within expert report is not a judicial admission but is instead an admission by party holding that an admission  falls under the rule of completeness holding that admission of rule 404b evidence was proper holding impeachment evidence falls within the brady rule