Debtor ignores the central issues in this appeal. His appellate brief is silent about the statutory provisions which govern the outcome of this case, namely, §§ 1112(b) and 109(g): he neglects his failure to respond to the Order to Show Cause, his failure to file a plan that was either timely or confirmable, the fact that the instant case was his second defective filing within a year, and the issue of the best interests of creditors. Additionally, he has failed to show any special circumstances which would outweigh the bankruptcy court’s inherent authority to manage its own docket. Even if such circumstances existed, the Debtor has waived them on appeal by failing to mention them in his brief. See Furness v. Wright Med. Tech., Inc. (In re Mercurio), 402 F.3d 62, 64 n. 1 (1st Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). CONCLUSION The record amply supports the
holding that the failure to oppose a basis for summary judgment constitutes waiver of that argument on appeal holding failure to brief argument constitutes waiver holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue holding that partys failure to develop issue in argument section constitutes waiver of issue holding that the failure to identify or argue an issue in an opening brief constitutes waiver of that argument on appeal