White “to come back to him” if people liked McLendon’s product. Id. at 204. In a telephone conversation following that transaction, McLendon told Pearson that his “bags” were packed and “ready to go,” which, she testified, meant that he was ready to sell more crack. 1/6/00 Tr. at 91-92. Thereafter, McLendon and White spoke repeatedly to arrange additional transactions. See, e.g., 1/5/00 Tr. at 23-26. On one particular day, McLendon paged White three times. These repeated efforts to initiate additional deals persuasively demonstrated McLendon’s predisposition. In light of this strong evidence of McLendon’s guilt, coupled with the judge’s curative instructions, we conclude that the impact of the investigator’s brief reference to ammunition was, if anything, de m 381 (D.C.Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 5 . Those charges were for carrying a firearm
holding that guns located in trunk of car were carried under statute holding that defendant who was a passenger in a car had joint constructive possession of drugs found next to the defendants luggage in truck of car even where she disclaimed ownership of the drugs holding that evidence of the defendants connection to the guns suggests possession of the drugs found next to the guns holding the district court did not clearly err in applying the enhancement where guns were found on the same premises from which the defendant trafficked drugs and were readily accessible to the defendant holding enhancement applicable where the record supported conclusion that drugs were stored and cut in the same location as the guns even though a search of the location yielded no drugs