Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 53-54, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). The “core class” of testimonial statements includes affidavits or declarations “made under circumstances which would lead an objective witness reasonably to believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial.” Id. at 51-52, 124 S.Ct. 1354. This is because such testimonial evidence is “functionally identical to live, in-court testimony.” Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 S.Ct. 2527, 2532, 174 L.Ed.2d 314 (2009). Business and public records are generally nontestimonial because they were created for the internal administration of the entity rather than for trial evidentiary purposes. Id. at 2539-40; see, e.g., United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1077 (9th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). We agree with the district court’s conclusion
holding that driving records were nontestimonial holding that records of a criminal defendants previous convictions in state court are nontestimonial holding that statements in medical records given for the primary purpose of medical diagnosis and treatment are nontestimonial holding that certified records of maintenance are nontestimonial and are not prepared for any particular defendant holding that to the extent medical records may be properly categorized as business records such records are properly categorized as nontestimonial