may submit a statement of additional facts which the respondent contends are material and present a genuine issue for trial. Local Rule 56.1, NDGa. However, the court “will not consider” any such fact if it is: (a) not supported by a citation to evidence (including' page or paragraph number); (b) supported by a citation to a pleading rather than to evidence; (c) stated as an issue or legal conclusion; or (d) set out only in the brief and not in the movant’s statement of undisputed facts. Local Rule 56.1, NDGa. “[Fjailure to comply with local rule 56.1 is not a mere technicality”; instead, the rule provides “the only permissible way for [the non-movant] to establish a genuine issue of material fact.” Mann, 588 F.3d at 1303; see also Reese v. Herbert, 527 F.3d 1253, 1268 (11th Cir. 2008) (<HOLDING>). Applying this rule, the magistrate judge
holding that a district court should disregard or ignore evidence relied on by the respondent when not properly cited in response to a movants statement of undisputed facts holding that the district court was entitled to deference in its application of  4b12 of the sentencing guidelines in a case where the underlying facts were undisputed holding that the district court properly dismissed an indictment where the parties argued the applicability of a statute based on a set of undisputed facts holding that waiver should be reviewed de novo when decided without trial on undisputed facts holding that summary judgment for state appropriate notwithstanding states failure to annex a statement of undisputed facts to its summaryjudgment motion where petitioner was aware of facts relied upon by state and never disputed them