of speech on public property, the Supreme Court has divided such property into various categories: the traditional public forum, the designated public forum, the limited public forum, and the nonpublic forum. See Christian Legal Society v. Martinez, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2971, 2984 n. 11, 177 L.Ed.2d 838 (2010); Perry Ed. Ass’n v. Perry Local Educators’ Ass’n, 460 U.S. 37, 46, 103 S.Ct. 948, 74 L.Ed.2d 794 (1983). Public streets and parks are the “archetype of a traditional public forum.” Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 480, 108 S.Ct. 2495, 101 L.Ed.2d 420 (1988). Indeed, they occupy a “ ‘special position in terms of First Amendment protection,’ ” because “ ‘[t]ime out of mind’ public streets and 0 L.Ed.2d 511 (1998); ACLU of Nevada v. City of Las Vegas, 333 F.3d 1092, 1100-06 (2003) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1110, 124 S.Ct. 1077,
holding that bostons fish pier is not a traditional public forum holding that a portion of main street sold  to church and converted into pedestrian plaza is a traditional public forum because by retaining easement for public passage city intended to encourage pedestrian traffic and to preserve and enhance the downtown pedestrian grid holding that the fremont street experience a publiclyowned commercial and entertainment pedestrian district in downtown las vegas is a traditional public forum holding that the venice beach boardwalk is a traditional public forum holding that chicagos navy pier is not a traditional public forum