unless a contrary intention appears in the deed or conveyance, or a declaration of trust is recorded. The statute also permits any person to record a declaration of trust before or after the recordation of the deed. Because the deeds used in the initial conveyance of the parcel to Hoffenberg did not identify either trust, name the trust beneficiaries or state the nature or purpose of either trust, and because a declaration of trust was never recorded under section 689.07, the trial court was correct in finding that Hoffenberg owned each parcel in fee simple absolute. See, e.g., Zosman v. Schiffer, 697 So.2d 1018 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (recognizing language referring to the owners as trustees did not change the nature of the transaction); Terry v. Zaffran, 483 So.2d 526 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (<HOLDING>); Glusman v. Warren, 413 So.2d 857 (Fla. 4th
holding that creditors of a trust beneficiary were prohibited from intervening in an action involving a dispute between the trustee and a beneficiary concerning distribution of the trust corpus holding that the deferential standard of review of a plan interpretation is appropriate only when the trust instrument allows the trustee to interpret the instrument and when the trust ee has in fact interpreted the instrument holding that without a declaration of trust being recorded or any beneficiary specifically named the words as trustee in an instrument of conveyance do not encumber or effect a grantees individual ownership of real estate holding that where the grantee a named corporation did not exist at the time of the purported conveyance and was not capable of taking title title to real estate did not pass and no real estate transfer tax was owed holding that the beneficiary of a trust was not the real party in interest regarding rights owned by the trust