not support GMU’s decision and the University has established an “impossible standard to overcome.” Standard of Review Any student who wants to challenge a Virginia state university’s final administrative decision denying her application for in-state tuition has the right to appeal the decision to the circuit court for the jurisdiction in which the institution is located. Va. Code Ann. § 23-7.4:3(A). The institution is required to forward the administrative record to the court, and the court’s only function is “to determine whether the decision reached by the institution could reasonably be said, on the basis of the record, not to be arbitrary, capricious, or otherwise contraiy to law.” Id.; see also Ravindranathan v. Virginia Commonwealth Univ., 258 Va. 269, 274, 519 S.E.2d 618 (1999) (<HOLDING>). Applicable Law Under Virginia law, in order
recognizing that a court may reverse the pelrbs actions where those actions are arbitrary capricious or an abuse of discretion    not supported by substantial evidence on the record taken as a whole or otherwise not in accordance with law holdingthat the circuit court cannot reweigh the evidence and is limited in its review to determine whether the universitys actions were arbitrary capricious or otherwise contrary to law quoting va code ann  23743 holding that when applying an arbitrary and capricious standard of review the courts role is to determine whether the plan administrators decision was completely unreasonable holding that an agencys decision is to be set aside only if it is arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law  holding the court will not disturb the decision of the abcmr unless it was arbitrary capricious contrary to law or unsupported by substantial evidence