SE2d 662) (1982). By contrast, for more than 150 years, the Code has said that “[e]very marriage contract in writing, made in contemplation of marriage, shall be liberally construed to carry into effect the intention of the parties and no want of form or technical expression shall invalidate the same.” OCGA § 19-3-63. However, the statute also requires that “[t]he contract must be attested by at least two witnesses.” Id. The Premarital Agreement at issue in this case was attested by only one witness, so if it is a “marriage contract,” it is invalid and unenforceable. Prenuptial agreements that settle property rights only during the course of a prospective marriage or at death are marriage contracts under OCGA § 19-3-63. See Sullivan v. Sullivan, 286 Ga. 53, 53-54 (684 SE2d 861) (2009) (<HOLDING>); Dove, 285 Ga. at 648 (explaining that
holding that an agreement that defined the parties respective rights in the property of the other and waived each spouses right in the others property either before or after death was a marriage contract holding that scope of property subject to forfeiture is defined by the instrument creating an interest in the property holding that an increase in the value of nonmarital property attributable to the efforts of one or both spouses during marriage is marital property holding that spouse could not claim exemption in property that was only property of other spouses estate holding that an agreement which both addressed alimony and divided the parties property in the event of divorce was not a marriage contract subject to ocga  19363