These portions of the statute affirmatively require the City to make reasonable accommodations for handicapped residences. See City of Edmonds, 18 F.3d at 806; Turning Point, Inc. v. City of Caldwell, 74 F.3d 941, 945 (9th Cir.1996). The statute does not, however, require reasonable accommodation for health care facilities. The record establishes that a significant portion of the building size is devoted to the proposed adult health care facility. It occupies nearly half the square footage of the building and the bottom floor of the two-story building. If the health care facility were necessary to house the physically challenged living in the building, reasonable accommodation might be construed to include the health care complex. See Bronk v. Ineichen, 54 F.3d 425 (7th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Gamble has not alleged, however, that this
holding that rental value was properly included as part of damages on action for breach of building contract where contractor failed to complete building within contracted time holdingextra expense coverage for the construction of a new building when the insured previously rented the building contravened the parties intent holding that if a deaf tenant needed a hearing dog to live in a building section 3604f3b could require the building owner to relax the rule prohibiting animals holding that a new york state law requiring the owner of an apartment building to allow the installation of cable equipment on the building which amounted to a few wires and a small box on the roof constituted a taking holding that the measure of damages for breaching a building construction contract is ordinarily such sum as is required to make the building conform to the contract