to the standard contract’s essential terms, of which the indemnification clause was one. See Novel Iron Works, Inc. v. Wexler Construction Co., 26 Mass.App.Ct. 401, 408 (1988) (essential terms of the contract were all included in a written agreement which was exchanged, but not signed). Plaintiffs additionally point to Sawyer’s liability insurance contract with Monticello Insurance Co., wherein Sawyer had required the insurance carrier to name Hancock and Walsh as additional insureds, and contend that Sawyer’s act of having the plaintiffs named as additional insureds on its insurance policy raises an issue of fact regarding whether or not an implied contractual indemnity exists between the parties, citing Trans America Insurance Group v. Turner Const. Co., 33 Mass.App.Ct. 446 (1992) (<HOLDING>). Id. In arguing that Sawyer’s insurance
holding that an agreement which required the submission of an affidavit of payment to subcontractors or lien waivers before payment was made by the general contractor was for the direct benefit of the subcontractors holding that the condominium association was not a thirdparty beneficiary of contracts between the owner and contractor of the condominium building and between the general contractor and the subcontractors holding that subcontractor was not obligated to indemnify general contractor for general contractors own negligence where indemnification clause did not expressly state that subcontractor would indemnify general contractor for such negligence holding that bankruptcy trustee for contractor could not avoid prepetition payment of funds from contractor to subcontractors holding in part that the liability insurance company of the subcontractor which had named the general contractor as an additional insured on the subcontractors policy was liable to reimburse the general contractor for a settlement payment the general contractor had made to the subcontractors employee