under this scenario, a sailboat tacking twenty times up the East Coast of the United States from Miami to New York, which had aboard illegal substances acquired in Miami, would be subject to being charged with twenty violations of exportation under § 953(a), and twenty violations of importation under § 952(a), one for each time it tacked out to and from international waters. As if the above scenarios were not ludicrous enough, at oral argument, the government also informed us that in the above situations, since international borders were crossed, border crossing rules are applicable, with all of the consequent diminished Fourth Amendment implications such circumstances bring into play. See United States v. Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 616-19, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 1978-80, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1976) (<HOLDING>); Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132,
holding that governments right to search all persons and their belongings who cross its borders is plenary and is reasonable per se within the fourth amendment holding that a canine sniff is a search for purposes of the fourth amendment holding that the warrantless search of knights supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by a condition of probation was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment holding that such any and all language is per se unconstitutional for lack of particularity holding that per se statutory rule is not permissible under fourth amendment