1045 (Fla.2004); Fla. Bar v. McAtee, 674 So.2d 734 (Fla.1996). Further, in Florida Bar v. Brown, 635 So.2d 13, 13 (Fla.1994), this Court stated that a “[cjlear violation of any order or disciplinary status that denies an attorney the license to practice law generally is punishable by disbarment.” In this case, the referee’s report and the record do not sufficiently establish that D’Ambrosio clearly violated this Court’s order of suspension by appearing in court. In addition to the inadequacy of factual findings, the referee’s report also fails to conduct an analysis of the facts in light of the case law. Given these deficiencies in the record and the referee’s report, there is an insufficient basis for this Court to disbar D’Ambrosio. See Fla. Bar v. Rayman, 238 So.2d 594 (Fla.1970) (<HOLDING>); see also Fla. Bar v. Shoureas, 892 So.2d 1002
holding that board erred in requiring admission of guilt and repentance as part of the proof of present good character and rehabilitation holding that erroneous findings of fact not necessary to support the judgment of the court are not grounds for reversal holding that erroneous findings of fact not necessary to support the judgment are not grounds for reversal holding that the evidence did not present the proof necessary to warrant the findings of guilt and disbarment holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence