at 1389. And in Viveros, there was no evidence that the victim had even been “aware of or comprehended the events preceding the shooting” nor was there any evidence that the victim had been in fear. 699 So.2d at 826. Here, the evidence reflected that Bryant was observed shooting at a group of men, which included Freytes-Calderon, causing the men to run and duck down. One of the men who was in the group testified that as a result of the incident, he was “in shock” and “scared.” We hold that these circumstances were such that they would “ ‘ordinarily induce fear in the mind of a reasonable man.’ ” Sullivan v. State, 898 So.2d 105, 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (quoting Gilbert v. State, 347 So.2d 1087, 1088 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)); see also Jefferson v. State, 186 So.2d 842, 843 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966) (<HOLDING>); Johnson v. State, 888 So.2d 691, 692 (Fla.
holding that evidence was sufficient to establish aggravated assault where appellant was seen pointing and firing a gun at two women holdingthat evidence was sufficient to support defendants convictions on rape and aggravated assault charges holding that where evidence was sufficient for attempted murder it was necessarily sufficient for aggravated assault which is a lesser included offense holding that although pointing an unloaded gun would generally not be sufficient to support a conviction for recklessly endangering another person where the commonwealth presented evidence that there was at least one bullet in the gun a conviction could stand holding that evidence was sufficient where there was testimony that appellant was seen threatening the victim and that other people were afraid