and that Anderer could not explain what caused J.R.’s nose to bleed. J.R.’s statement alone is an insufficient basis for probable cause. As the case law in this circuit emphasizes, the statement of one witness or victim is a sufficient basis for probable cause only where that witness is credible or the information is trustworthy. See Driebel, 298 F.3d at 643, quoting Woods, 234 F.3d at 996 (“[A] report from a single, credible victim or eyewitness can provide the basis for probable cause.”) (emphasis added); Pasiewicz v. Lake County Forest Preserve District, 270 F.3d 520, 524-25 (7th Cir. 2001) (finding probable cause where there was no indication that two eyewitnesses were lying or that their information was not credible or accurate); Hebron v. Touhy, 18 F.3d 421, 422-23 (7th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Sheik-Abdi v. McClellan, 37 F.3d 1240, 1247
holding that probable cause is a complete defense to an action for false arrest holding landlord and tenants obligations mutually dependent holding that police officers have probable cause to arrest an individual with a sufficiently similar appearance to the description in a warrant holding that a statement by evicted tenants against their former landlord against whom they might bear a grudge is not sufficiently reliable to support probable cause and that police must accumulate more evidence to support an arrest holding tenants leasing house by oral agreement were coinsureds both landlord and tenants had liability insurance