understood by the public under these circumstances as evidencing that Bresler had committed a crime. ¶ 13 First, the Court noted that the public debates in question were a subject of substantial concern for those living in the community. 398 U.S. at 13, 90 S.Ct. 1537. Further, the newspaper reports were accurate and complete. Id. The reports accurately and fully described Bresler’s proposal, that some people at the meetings had made the “blackmail” reference, and that some other people at the meeting supported Bresler. Id. at 14, 90 S.Ct. 1537. The Court stated: It is simply impossible to believe that a reader who reached the word “blackmail” in either article would not have understood exactly what was meant: it was Bresler’s public and wholly legal negotiat P.2d 999, 1010 (Utah 1994) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 15 The Rushes next contend that the
holding that to charge employee with dishonesty in his dealings with his employer is defamatory per se because it falls within general classification of words that affect person injuriously in his profession or occupation holding that employer controlled the victims will at least in part by using his position as the victims employer holding that the accusation that west manipulated the press by trying to use his political position to influence information disseminated to the public was not defamatory absent assertions of illegal or at least ethically improper conduct it is not defamatory to criticize a politician for using his or her office for personal gain holding that evidence that the petitioner had a political opinion that he expressed it to his persecutors and that they threatened him only after he expressed his opinion compelled the conclusion that the threats were connected to his political opinion and not only to his failure to provide money in response to demands from the persecutors that predated his expression of his political opinion holding that for a legal malpractice claim to accrue a plaintiff need not know the precise extent of his or her damages or even have suffered all of the damages attributable to his or her attorneys negligence