there is nothing in the record showing whether the Debtors are in default under the terms of the Note and Deed of Trust. As such, the findings of the Bankruptcy Court are insufficient to support its order allowing the sale. Therefore, the Order allowing the sale must be reversed and this matter remanded for further proceedings consistent with this decision. B. The IRA The Debtors also appeal the Bankruptcy Court’s Order denying the Debtors’ Motion to Amend because it found that the Debtors acted in bad faith and prejudiced the Trustee. Even if this Court would not have necessarily reached the same findings as the Bankruptcy Court, it cannot hold those findings were clearly erroneous. See Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564, 573-574, 105 S.Ct. 1504, 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985) (<HOLDING>). Debtors may amend their petition, list,
holding that the trial courts factual findings related to alimony will be upheld on appeal if supported by   any evidence   holding that alleged prosecutorial misconduct must be evaluated in light of the prosecutors argument and the entire record and if a review of the record convinces the court that the jury would have convicted defendant even if it were not exposed to the alleged improper prosecutorial comments then no actual prejudice occurred holding that a lower courts findings must be upheld if found to be plausible in light of the entire record even though the reviewing court would have weighed the evidence differently if it sat as the trier of fact holding that a district courts factfindings must be upheld if plausible in light of the entire record holding that if a trial court reaches the right result but for the wrong reasons it will be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record