the fair market value of Yeoman’s property as of January 1, 2011, thereby authorizing the Board to determine if there had been an increase in the fair market value in the eight months after Yeoman purchased the property; that the 2010 Amendment conflicted with the LCA by limiting the fair market value to the April 2010 sale price; and that the LCA controls over a general law when the two conflict. The trial court, however, ruled that there was no conflict between the LCA and the 2010 Amendment and that the 2010 Amendment controlled the determination of the fair market value of Yeoman’s property. The Board appeals. 2. The Board is correct that a local constitutional amendment controls over a statute if the two conflict. See Columbus-Muscogee County Consolidated Govt., 276 Ga. at 333-334 (<HOLDING>); Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Par. V
holding that a conflict of interest on the part of the prosecution violates the due process clause of the virginia constitution holding that the lca is part of the georgia constitution recognizing that oath taken to honor state constitution makes it the justices duty to apply the state constitution when it does not conflict with the federal constitution holding the exclusion did not violate the equal protection clause of the wyoming constitution or the fourteenth amendment to the united states constitution recognizing that provisions of the colorado constitution should be construed in the context of the constitution as a whole