and entry. Officer Bostwick, who was found credible by the district court, testified that the officers waited “approximately a minute” between announcing their presence and forcing entry. (Apx. at 83). Officer Anderson did not specifically state how much time elapsed, but he testified that the officers pounded the door for a “few seconds, maybe ten seconds,” before listening for a response and eventually forcing entry. (Apx. at 100). There is substantial precedent, both in this circuit and others, for the proposition that a wait of no more than fifteen seconds between announcement and entry may be sufficient when a drug search warrant is executed. See United States v. Spikes, 158 F.3d 913, 925-27 (6th Cir.1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1086, 119 S.Ct. 836, 142 L.Ed.2d 692 (1999) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Gatewood, 60 F.3d 248, 250
holding that plaintiff in survival action bears burden of proving that death was not instantaneous although a few seconds survival constitutes sufficient amount of time to vest accrual of cause of action holding statutory violation sufficient cause holding evidence legally sufficient holding fifteen to thirty seconds sufficient holding that there was sufficient evidence of wanton endangerment where a bullet came within fifteen feet of a bystander