character, witnesses and presenting psychiatric evidence of .its own. Id. at 699, 104 S.Ct. 2052. Counsel’s failure to request a presentence report was not deemed ineffective because the report would have, contained information about respondent’s criminal history and .undermined the claim that he had no significant prior cr 358, 360 (2d Cir.2005) (summary order) (finding state court reasonably concluded counsel rendered meaningful assistance, and that there was no evidence that a strategy pursuing an alibi defense would have supported defendant’s claim). A counsel’s performance will be found unreasonable or ineffective only “when it is so deficient that it falls outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance.” Kovacs v. United States, 744 F.3d 44, 50 (2d Cir.2014) (<HOLDING>); Rivas v. Fischer, 780 F.3d 529, 549-51 (2d
holding that a defendant is not entitled to relief where he has been given affirmative misadvice regarding the possible sentenceenhancing consequences of a plea in the event that the defendant commits a new crime in the future holding that for a facially sufficient claim that the plea was involuntary based on misadvice of counsel defendant must allege he would not have accepted the plea agreement but for the misadvice holding no reasonable jurist could find a defense counsels affirmative misadvice as to the immigration consequences of a guilty plea to be objectively reasonable citations omitted holding that right to effective assistance of counsel requires that defendant be advised of immigration consequences of plea holding that the governments position must be justified to a degree that could satisfy a reasonable person and have a reasonable basis in both law and fact citations omitted