embolden, or help others in committing a erime is not enough to qualify as 'encouragement' as that term is commonly used." Id. Thus, "(there must be evidence showing ... some active behavior, or at least speech or other expression, that served to assist or encourage ... in committing the crime." Id. 116. 113 Under the Group Crime Enhancement statute, "it is not enough that others were present when the crime was committed{[; rjather, the quality of their involvement must rise to the level of participation described" in the statute: aiding or encouraging. See State v. Labrum, 959 P.2d 120, 123-24 (Utah Ct.App.1998) ("Mere presence, or even prior knowledge, does not make one an accomplice when he neither ... encourages [nlor assists in perpetration of the crime."); see also id. at 124 (<HOLDING>). Although another person's "mere presence at
holding that because statutory variants of an underlying crime are not elements of an attempt to commit the underlying crime jurors are not required to unanimously find which specific statutory variant the defendant intended to commit it is sufficient that they unanimously conclude that the defendant intended to commit any of the applicable statutory variants recognizing that if the legislature had intended to enhance the sentences of those who commit crimes merely in the presence of two or more other persons the statutory language would read differently holding that the court assumes the legislature acquiesced in our interpretation of the language because the legislature had not amended the language recognizing the doctrine of entrapment and noting that it will always therefore be presumed that the legislature intended exceptions to statutory language which would avoid results of this character recognizing obligation to read the language of the statute in light of previously established common law