its bad faith, can result in a breach of an obligation necessarily implied by the contract. As there is competent evidence in the record to support the finding, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that Sun breached its duty of good faith inspection. ¶ 21 Third, we examine the effect of Sun’s breach on the other provisions of the contract. In general, when a party fails to satisfy an express contractual obligation, the lack of performance is a breach of the provision creating that obligation. On the other hand, when there is no provision creating an obligation, a failure to act in a certain way amounts to no more than exercise of privileges reserved in the contract. See, e.g., Heritage Surveyors & Eng’rs, Inc. v. Nat’l Penn Bank, 801 A.2d 1248, 1253 (Pa.Super.2002) (<HOLDING>); Baker v. Lafayette Coll., 350 Pa.Super. 68,
holding that a lending institution does not violate a separate duty of good faith by adhering to its agreements with a borrower or enforcing its contractual rights as a creditor holding in a case decided under ohio law that a franchisor cannot be found liable for failure to act in good faith where it has done no more than to insist on enforcing its contract rights to the detriment of its franchisee holding that an insurer has a duty to act with the utmost good faith towards its insured holding that franchisors have a duty to act in good faith and with commercial reasonableness when terminating franchise agreements holding that the duty of good faith and fair dealing is a contractual duty