of general conditions in the regulated field”). 19 . The press release includes the additional statement attributed to Director Crum that "[tjhese three companies have failed to operate and maintain their facilities in accordance with state law and we are taking the actions necessary to prevent future violations.” 20 . Director Crum began his employment with DEP one week after the show cause order had been issued to Marfork. He testified that he built a "Chinese wall” around himself with regard to the Marfork proceeding. 21 . An example of the additional type of bias evidence that is required would be evidence that the hearing examiner stood to benefit financially from the result that was reached. See Ward v. Village of Monroeville, 409 U.S. 57, 93 S.Ct. 80, 34 L.Ed.2d 267 (1972) (<HOLDING>); cf. Commonwealth of N. Mariana Islands v.
holding that a defendant could not establish stricklands prejudice prong because any erroneous exclusion of an impartial juror was harmless because we have every reason to believe the replacement was also an impartial juror the defendant does not dispute that he was convicted and sentenced by an impartial jury and he presents no reason to think that a jury composed of a slightly different set of impartial jurors would have reached a different verdict holding that mayor whose village revenues were comprised of between onethird to onehalf of levied traffic fines could not be impartial hearing examiner holding that notice to original attorney not formally withdrawn comprised proper notice holding that three and onehalf months between the filing of an eeoc charge and the adverse employment action was insufficient by itself to establish causation holding a three and onehalf year delay was unreasonable