closing statement ... has never walked a mile in his shoes.... So how dare she pass judgment on who he is or whether or not he is capable of telling the truth.... Id. at 46-47. I venture to say, and I don’t know the heart and mind of the Creator, but I venture to say that when he looks down upon Curtis Cesar, he likes what he sees. Somebody who just gets up and does what he can do. That goes to work and comes in here and tells the truth to the best of his ability, and that’s why I’m standing here today because Curtis Cesar’s just as important to me as anybody else is .... Id. at 48-49. ¶ 19 We note first that Guilford did not object at trial to these remarks, and thus, his issue is waived for purposes of appeal. See Commonwealth v. Sanchez, 416 Pa.Super. 160, 610 A.2d 1020, 1030 (1992) (<HOLDING>). However, even if not waived, the issue is
holding party must make timely and specific objection at trial to preserve issue for appellate review holding that in order to preserve an issue for review a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial holding that appellants failure to raise preemption argument until posttrial motions constitutes waiver of defense holding that failure to raise issue at district court forecloses party from raising same issue on appeal holding that the failure to raise an issue objection or argument in a timely manner during trial forecloses further review of an alleged error in posttrial motions or at the appellate level