because the accident originated on a drilling platform off the coast of Texas, and OCSLA situs, federal maritime law does not apply of its own force because Torres was not a maritime employee and his profession had not significant relation to a traditional maritime activity, and, as will be discussed, the applicable Texas law is not inconsistent with federal law. Smith v. Pan Air Corp., 684 F.2d 1102, 1110 (5th Cir.1982) (“[W]e have applied OCSLA and, consequently, state law, to incidents in which platform works who were the victims of torts originating on these artificial islands were not ac 340, 352 (5th Cir.1999) (work modifying offshore platform bears no significant relation to traditional mari time activity); In re Dearborn Marine Serv., Inc., 499 F.2d 263, 272-76 (5th Cir.1974) (<HOLDING>). Shell cannot be liable for the condition or
holding that wrongful death actions asserted under admiralty jurisdiction lie under general maritime law for death caused by violation of maritime duties and are not limited to standards of liability created by state law holding that platform workers death caused by an explosion on a platform bore no significant relation to maritime law even though the death occurred while the worker was located on a vessel in navigable waters holding offshore platform worker not engaged in maritime employment holding that a jetski injury met the second prong because the activity in question  operating a vessel in navigable waters  has a maritime connection holding that federal maritime law and not state law applies to all actions for wrongful death in navigable state waters