sur-' vive arbitrary and capricious review, it must be made in consideration of all the hearing officer's evidentiary findings. T 44 In other contexts, we have recognized that an inquiry into what is reasonable necessarily requires an examination of the underlying circumstances. See, e.g., Herr v. People, 198 P.3d 108, 114 (Colo. 2008) ("What ° constitutes a reasonable effort [to secure a ruling on a Crim. P. 35(b) motion] by the defendant is dependent on the unique circumstances of the case." (emphasis added)); Farmers Grp., Inc. v. Trimble, 691 P.2d 1138, 1142 (Colo. 1984) ("[The standard applicable to establish the tort of bad faith remains one of reasonableness under the circumstances." (emphasis added)); Spensieri v. Farmers All. Mut. Ins. Co., 804 P.2d 268, 270 (Colo. App. 1990) (<HOLDING>). Consistent with these cases, Black's Law
holding that in deciding whether the jurys award is inadequate the test is whether reasonable people could not conclude that the  award was reasonable compensation holding that an attorneys fees award is not appealable until the amount of the award is set recognizing discretion of district court in determining a fee award holding that attorneys fee award in a common fund case must be  reasonable under the circumstances holding that when an attorney fee award is made under a statute that does not define reasonable the award should be determined in light of all cetreumstances emphasis added