child support arrearage at the rate of $200 monthly without interest. He was also ordered to maintain medical insurance on the children and to reimburse the wife 100 percent of all out-of-pocket medical expenses. The court found the $36,000 buy-out the husband received from his former firm, Warner, Gallas-py and Lobel [WGL], was a marital asset and ordered the husband to pay the wife $18,000 at the rate of $350 p on, 675 So.2d 1370 (Fla.1996); see also Sunday v. Sunday, 610 So.2d 62 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992) (entry of fee award without a determination of reasonable rate and hours expended requires remand). Remand for the requisite findings is not appropriate here because the wife failed to bring forth any evidence to support such findings. See Davis v. Davis, 613 So.2d 147 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993) (<HOLDING>); Wiley v. Wiley, 485 So.2d 2 (Fla. 5th DCA
holding evidence which was similar to the evidence offered here to be factually sufficient to support an award of attorneys fees holding that where there is competent evidence to support the courts findings the admission of incompetent evidence is not prejudicial holding that while remand is appropriate where the record may contain substantial competent evidence to support findings as to the rowe factors reversal is required where the record is devoid of any evidence to support the award of attorneys fees holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees