are prison regulations and not statutes adopted through a legislative process. Therefore, Turner v. Safley sets out the appropriate standard for analyzing Plaintiffs' constitutional challenges. See Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 224, 110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990)(Turner applies whenever "the needs of prison administration implicate constitutional rights”); see also Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 123 S.Ct. 2162, 156 L.Ed.2d 162 (2003)(analyzing facial challenges to sections of Mich. Admin. Code under the Turner factors). 25 . Two recent cases from the Supreme Court rely on the distinct psychological and neurological attributes of juveniles in support of different treatment under the Constitution. See Graham v. Florida, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (<HOLDING>); Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551, 125 S.Ct.
holding that life without parole sentences for nonhomicide offenses violates the eighth amendment holding that mandatory life imprisonment without parole for those under the age of eighteen at the time of their crimes violates eighth amendment holding that the eighth amendment forbids life without the possibility of parole for a juvenile who commits a nonhomicide offense holding that sentences imposing mandatory life imprisonment without the possibility of parole on individuals who committed their crimes when under the age of 18 violates the eighth amendment to the united states constitution holding that consecutive fixedterm sentences for juveniles who committed multiple nonhomicide offenses are not clearly unconstitutional under graham even when they amount to the practical equivalent of life without parole