10. Therefore, any conclusions based upon the interview responses of older children are irrelevant to the conclusion asserted by the plaintiffs. Finally, and perhaps most important, the Court’s concern extends beyond the children who are parties to this case. The constitutional dimensions implicated here affect all of the children at H.M.E.S., not merely the plaintiffs. Even if the proffered expert testimony were valid, it strains credulity to suggest that a ten-year old child, not to mention a five-year old, could possibly have the cognitive function and the Solomonic wisdom to discern questions of the jurisprudential complexity posed here. Although the courts continue to lower the age at which students are capable of participating fully in the marketplace of ideas, see, e.g., Widmar (<HOLDING>) and Gregoire (recognizing a high school as
holding that a permissive forum selection clause containing a waiver of any claims of forum non conveniens amounts to a mandatory forum selection clause at least where the plaintiff chose the designated forum holding that a public high school newspaper was a limited public forum not a traditional or designated public forum because there was no evidence that the school permitted indiscriminate use by the general public quoting hazelwood sch dist v kuhlmeier 484 us 260 267 108 sct 562 98 led2d 592 1988 recognizing a university campus as limited public forum recognizing that government is not required to retain open nature of designated public forum recognizing that where plaintiff is from the forum state and defendant is from an alternate forum each forum can claim a connection to one of the parties