because the act she is charged with committing does not constitute a violation of the statute. “Conviction of a non-existent crime is fundamental error which requires reversal, regardless of whether the error was invited by the defendant.” Harkness, 771 So.2d at 589; see also Mundell; Fredericks, 675 So.2d at 990 (“Conviction of a non-existent crime is fundamental error mandating reversal even when the error was invited by the defendant, as was the case here, by request for a jury instruction on a non-existent offense.”) (citing Achin). Therefore, under the circumstances of the instant case, the fact that Jordan entered a plea to a nonexistent charge without objecting to the contents of the information does not prevent her from challenging her conviction on appeal. See Harkness (<HOLDING>). Exhausting ingenuity in their attempt to
holding that the trial courts written order was not the entry of a sentence sufficient to support a determination that a judgment of conviction was entered recognizing that where a defendant enters a plea to a crime without having been informed of the crimes elements  the plea is invalid  holding that conviction for a crime that required breaking and entering also required the state to prove that defendant had actually entered the premises holding that a defendant must show reasonable probability that but for the error he would not have entered the plea holding that reversal of a conviction of a nonexistent crime pursuant to a plea entered by the defendant was warranted