Chassidie to remain in the courtroom while the Harveys took possession of CAIH at Chassidie's residence. Chassidie was not able to say goodbye to CAIH and did not see her for the next five weeks. 7 . The August 3, 2006 temporary orders recite that “[t]he parties have agreed to the terms of this order as evidenced by their signatures on the Associate Judge's recommendation on file in this cause.” But nowhere in the associate judge's report, which Chassidie and her counsel signed, is section 153.3161 or David’s possible deployment mentioned. Nor does the report contain any explicit "agreement” as to factual allegations that would support standing under the family code. See, e.g., Oryx Energy Co. v. Union Nat’l Bank of Tex., 895 S.W.2d 409, 416-17 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1995, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). 8 . Chassidie refers to this order as the
holding that defamation standing alone is not sufficient to establish a claim for deprivation of a liberty interest citations omitted holding that circumstantial evidence alone may establish discriminatory intent holding that perjured testimony standing alone does not constitute fraud upon the court holding that circumstantial evidence such as shape does not need to be sufficient standing alone to establish a racial gerrymandering claim holding that signature underneath heading approved and agreed standing alone does not establish consent judgment