661 F.3d at 75 (quotation marks and citation omitted). In this case, Plaintiffs claim that the final EIS prepared by BLM is inadequate for a number of reasons. The Court addresses each reason in turn. 1. Ozone Emissions WildEarth Plaintiffs first contend that BLM failed to analyze the impacts of ozone emissions on local air quality. See, e.g., WildEarth Pis.’ [89] Mem. at 9 (“Plaintiffs’ complaint about the lack of ozone analysis ... stems from BLM’s complete failur issions, an ozone precursor, stating that although there are no anticipated point sources for NOx emissions at the mine itself, NOx emissions are associated with tailpipe emissions from mining equipment and from trains used to transport coal from the mine. See J.A. 1047-48; see also WildEarth Pis.’ [89] Mem. at 9 (<HOLDING>). Finally, BLM identified the potential health
holding the precursor statute to  1498 to be nonjurisdictional as to private defendants merely establishing an affirmative defense recognizing that the determination is an equitable one recognizing rule recognizing that campbell county is in attainment with the current ozone naaqs recognizing that nox is an ozone precursor