out in detail the pay structure for Stryker’s commission-based sales representatives. See Piaskoski & Assocs. v. Ricciardi 275 Wis.2d 650, 686 N.W.2d 675, 679 (Wis.Ct.App.2004) (listing the three basic requirements for a contract: offer, acceptance, and consideration); Petersen v. Pilgrim Vill., 256 Wis. 621, 42 N.W.2d 273, 274 (1950) (“An offer must be so definite in its terms, or require such definite terms in the acceptance, that the promises and performances to be rendered by each party are reasonably certain.” (quotation marks omitted)). The parties manifested their consent to be bound by the compensation plan when Carroll continued to work for the company after receiving it, and Stryker paid him in accordance with its terms until he was terminated. Ricciardi 686 N.W.2d at 679 (<HOLDING>). This exchange of services for pay also
holding mutual assent in contract law is elementary and it must be expressed by the parties holding that ojffer and acceptance exist when the parties mutually express assent holding optionees acceptance of option without tender of purchase price created mutually binding contract entitling optionee to specific performance holding that the one thing without which a contract cannot be made  is the assent of the parties to the agreement the meeting of the minds upon a definite proposition recognizing that silence can operate as acceptance where the parties may have been advised and warned by a previous course of dealings that inaction would be taken as assent