to whether the Association's claim was barred by laches. On appeal, the Association argues that the trial court erred by denying its motion for summary judgment based upon laches because McGHothin failed to plead this defense in her affirmative defenses. However, the Association did not present this argument to the trial court. It is well settled that arguments not presented to the trial court on summary judgment are waived on appeal. King v. Ebrens, 804 N.E.2d 821, 826 (Ind.Ct.App.2004). The trial court "cannot be found to have erred as to an issue or argument that it never had an opportunity to consider." GKC Indiana Theatres, Inc. v. Elk Retail Investors, LLC., 764 N.E.2d 647, 651 (Ind.Ct.App.2002). Thus, the Association has waived this argument. See, e.g., King, 804 N.E.2d at 826 (<HOLDING>); Mannon v. Howmet Transp. Serv., Inc., 641
holding that a party may not raise a claim on appeal that was not presented to the trial court holding that failure to make repeated objections is not ineffective when such objections would not have been sustained holding that a party waived its objections on appeal to an affidavit presented in support of a motion for summary judgment by failing to raise its objections to the trial court holding that when defendants only timely filed objections to expert report were that two statements were speculative defendant waived all other objections holding that arguments not presented to the district court in response to a motion for summary judgment are waived