805, 810 (7th Cir.2000). For his unreasonable seizure claim, Cady argues that the district court erred in concluding that the officers had a rea- sonable basis on which to approach him and that his actions, appearance, and calls from residents did not constitute enough suspicion for a permissible Terry-stop. We agree with the district court, however, that permissible encounters between police officers and citizens are not limited to situations involving possible criminal activity, but also include situations in which persons may need help or are in danger of harming themselves or others. See, e.g., Terry, 392 U.S. at 14 n. 9 (noting that police encounters are often initiated for reasons other than prosecuting crime, such as helping an intoxicated person find his way home). h Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Because the possibility that a citizen is
holding that 20minute stop was not unreasonable where the suspects actions contributed to delay about which he complained holding warrant check not unreasonable where detention not extended solely for that purpose holding that 20minute detention was not unreasonable where suspect gave misleading answers holding that the facts that the vehicle described in the tip was parked outside the home that allen gave inconsistent answers to officers questioning and that in addition the defendant fit the physical description of the suspect were sufficient to support the officers reasonable inference that the defendant was actually the suspect and therefore that there was probable cause to arrest him holding seizure unreasonable due to length of detention of property