as a defendant to answer as to any wrongful death claim he may assert. The driver of the vehicle that struck Travis was not sued. 2 . Neither party cites Restatement section 352, cited by the Court of Appeals, which provides for vendor liability for harm occurring "on the land," presumably because Travis was not injured on the property. Nor is there any claim asserted under Restatement sections 372 or 373. These sections discuss vendor liability for harm occurring "outside of the land" from "artificial conditions," which include "trees or plants planted or preserved . irrespective of whether they are harmful in themselves or become so only because of the subsequent operation of natural forces." Restatement § 363 crt. b. 3 . See, eg., Risk v. Schilling, 569 N.E.2d 646, 647-48 (Ind.1991) (<HOLDING>); Olds v. Noel, 857 N.E.2d 1041, 1046
holding that partnership that owned land had no liability for injury occurring in a workshop on the land when only one member of the partner ship had constructed the workshop and used it for a hobby holding that if respondents suit is one for permanent damages to the land the measure of damages is the decreased value of the land holding that a cause of action for damages to property resulting from a permanent nuisance accrues to the owner of the land at the time the injury begins to affect the land and mere transfer of the land by deed does not transfer the claim for damages holding that land sales contracts were not securities because they involved no investment in an enterprise even if land was bought on expectation that development of the area would increase the value of the land holding that animal husbandry operations were included in the definition of farm even if the animals do not touch the ground graze on the land or feed from crops grown on the land and holding that land used to support buildings used in the production of agricultural products is a productive use of the land