federal court, a district court may assume jurisdiction over the suit if it satisfies the ordinary requirements for an- ciliary jurisdiction. In a suit otherwise outside federal jurisdiction brought in state court, a district court may assume jurisdiction over the suit if it satisfies the ordinary requirements for ancillary jurisdiction and exceptional circumstances threatening the integrity of its prior rulings are present. Strictly speaking, the Krislov suit does not involve the sort of extraordinary circumstances described in In re VMS Securities. Any threat it presents to the integrity of the district court’s rulings in the Montgomery case is minimal, involving ordinary collateral estoppel and res judicata issues. Pacheco de Perez v. AT & T Co., 139 F.3d 1368, 1380 (11th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); In re Agent Orange, 996 F.2d at 1431
holding the court should only apply the doctrine narrowly and only under exceptional circumstances recognizing that issues raised for first time on appeal generally are not considered absent exceptional circumstances holding claims raised for first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances holding that such a threat would not supply exceptional circumstances holding in the absence of exceptional circumstances deference should be given to trial court