and 8.4(c) are violated when an attorney acts dishonestly and deceitfully by knowingly making false statements to Bar Counsel.” Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Harris, 403 Md. 142, 164, 939 A.2d 732 (2008). Respondent violated MLRPC 8.1(a) and 8.4(c), in connection with his representation of Mr. Brummell, when he falsely told Petitioner and Mr. Brummell that he would return Mr. Brummell’s case file upon his written request. MLRPC 8.1(b) MLRPC 8.1(b) states, in part, that an attorney shall not “knowingly fail to respond to a lawful demand for information from an admissions or disciplinary authority[.J” Failure to respond to letters from the Attorney Grievance Commission constitutes a violation of MLRPC 8.1(b). See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Gray, 436 Md. 513, 521-22, 83 A.3d 786 (2014) (<HOLDING>). The hearing judge found that Respondent
holding that an attorney violated mlrpc 11 by failing to take the necessary fundamental steps to further the clients case  holding an attorney violated rule 84c when the attorney made misrepresentations about holding two clients money in trust holding that the attorney violated mlrpc 81b when he failed to respond to two letters from the attorney grievance commission holding that an attorney violated mlrpc 84d by faffing to inform his client of the dismissal of his clients complaint holding that the attorney violated mlrpc 13 when he did not prosecute his clients claim after filing a complaint or protect against expiration of the statute of limitation for his clients complaint and caused discovery sanctions to be filed for his failure to respond to discovery requests