is sufficient to convict a defendant for “carrying” a firearm under § 924(c). See United States v. Farris, 77 F.3d 391, 395 & n. 4 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 241, 136 L.Ed.2d 170 (1996). In order to convict a defendant for “carrying” a firearm, it is necessary only to show that the defendant knowingly carried a gun in a car that was being used as a drug-distribution center. United States v. Range, 94 P.3d 614, 617 (11th Cir.l996)(defendant who knowingly carried a gun under the floormat of his car when delivering drug money was properly convicted of carrying a firearm under § 924(c), even though there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for use of a firearm); see also, Muscarello v. United States, — U.S. -, 118 S.Ct. 1911, 141 L.Ed.2d 111 (1998)(<HOLDING>). In Bousley, — U.S. at -, 118 S.Ct. at 1607,
holding that carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding the phrase carries a firearm is not limited to the carrying of firearms on the person but also applies to a person who knowingly possesses firearms in a vehicle including in the locked glove compartment or trunk of a car holding that carries a firearm includes one who knowingly possesses and conveys a firearm in a vehicle holding that a defendant carries a weapon by transporting it in a car within his reach but reserving the question of whether a firearm locked in the trunk would also be carried holding that the term carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk