As our Supreme Court has recently explained, OCGA § 5-6-48 (c)’s requirement that the trial court may not dismiss an appeal until first providing the parties with “notice and an opportunity for hearing” is “satisfied if the [complaining] party is given an opportunity to respond on the record to the motion to dismiss.” And to the extent our decision in McCorvey Development, Inc. v. D. G. Jenkins Development Corp. (upon which Kooby relies) can be read as standing for a contrary proposition, it is no longer of any precedential utility on that particular point of law. Decided July 5, 2011. Bradley W. Bledsoe, Ernest C. Trammell, for appellant. Allen, McCain & OMahony, Hunter S. Allen, Jr., Cara E. Weiner, Simuel F. Dosier, Jr., for appellees. Case No. A11A0237 In view o 2d 791) (1999) (<HOLDING>); Leonard v. Ognio, 201 Ga. App. 260, 261 (410
holding that a party failed to present any evidence to rebut inference that delay was unreasonable and inexcusable holding defendant failed to rebut statutory presumption where evidence was not particular to the facts and circumstances of the case holding that a five month delay was unreasonable holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable holding that evidence that a partys delay in paying costs was caused by a miscommunication was not sufficient to rebut inference