13, 2010) (“Claims for sexual harassment in education under Chapter 151C are actionable in Superior Court pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws. Ch. 214, § 1C.”); Morrison v. Northern Essex Comm. Coll., 56 Mass.App.Ct. 784, 786, 780 N.E.2d 132 (2002) (“Violations of c. 151C are actionable in Superior Court.” (citing Mass. Gen. Laws, ch. 214, § IQ). Plaintiff contends that she may bring a claim under either chapter 214, section 1C or chapter 151C, section 3(a). Plaintiffs interpretation of the statutory scheme, however, would render chapter 214 largely superfluous — at least with regard to sexual harassment as defined by chapter 151C— and is inconsistent with the interpretation advanced by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. See Lowery v. Klemm, 446 Mass. 572, 578, 845 N.E.2d 1124 (2006) (<HOLDING>). Prohibiting Plaintiff from bringing a claim
holding that chapter 214 section 1c extends to employees and students protection that is not otherwise available under gl c 151b and c 151c it does not duplicate the relief provided by those statutes holding that the judicial immunity available to federal officers extends to section 1983 actions for declaratory and injunctive relief holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea holding that equitable relief is not available to an individual under this section of the fdcpa holding that transfer rule denying eligibility to students transferring from public to private schools did not violate the students rights to due process or equal protection of the laws as provided by the fourteenth amendment