of the included articles. 8 . Planet's assertion that CNS seeks to create a "new hearing system” is therefore incorrect. CNS does argue that judges of the Ventura County Superior Court must conduct case-by-case adjudication whenever the court seeks to seal records, and that this adjudication must be consistent with First Amendment standards. But California law already so provides, see Cal. R. Ct. 2.551(a) ("A record must not be filed under seal without a court order.”); Cal. R. Ct. 2.550(d) (setting forth express factual findings required to seal court records), and these California rules must, of course, be applied in a manner consistent with the federal Constitution, cf. NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV) Inc. v. Superior Court, 20 Cal.4th 1178, 86 Cal.Rptr.2d 778, 980 P.2d 337, 361 (1999) (<HOLDING>). 9 . For instance, the right of access may be
holding that the first amendment right of access applies to a summary judgment motion in a civil case recognizing a right of access to civil proceedings holding that a provision of state law governing the closure of court proceedings must be interpreted in a manner compatible with the first amendment right of access holding that the first amendment secures for the public and the press a right of access to civil proceedings holding that although prison inmates have a first amendment right to access to the courts prison officials may regulate law library access including reasonable time place and manner of access taking into account the administrative needs of the institution