history in resolving this case, we do not mean to suggest that such extensive reliance is always appropriate. Legislative history is only one way to gauge legislative intent. The legislative history here is particularly instructive because it speaks to the specific circumstances of this case. In some cases with greater ambiguity in the historical record, the use of legislative history may not be the most analytically sound approach. 5 . Our decision today does not contravene our holding in City of Colorado Springs v. Powell, 48 P.3d 561, 566 (Colo.2002). There, we held that the city had a duty to maintain the natural features a ne if the government waived immunity for failing to secure boulders above road); Belfiore v. Colo. State Dep't of Highways, 847 P.2d 244, 246 (Colo.App.1993) (<HOLDING>); Schlitters v. State, 787 P.2d 656, 658
recognizing that immunity may be waived holding that a defendant waived a sentencing issue by failing to object in district court holding that the government waived immunity for failing to secure boulders above road holding that statutory grounds for recusal can be waived both by failing to object and by failing to assert error on appeal holding that the government waived immunity for failing to repair a damaged fence that allowed a cow to wander onto a roadway