under § 523(c) must be filed no later than 60 days after the original date set for the § 341 meeting of creditors. Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c). This deadline may be extended by the Court if a motion for an extension is filed before the expiration of the 60-day deadline. Id. If the 60-day deadline passes without the filing of either a motion for extension or complaint, then a nondischargeability complaint is time barred unless grounds exist for the Bankruptcy Court to exercise its equitable powers to permit a late filed complaint. See Farouki v. Emirates Bank Int’l Ltd., 14 F.3d 244, 248 (4th Cir. 1994) (time limitations for filing non-dischargeability complaints are not jurisdictional, but are in the nature of a statute of limitations); In re Hayden, 246 B.R. 795, 800 (Bankr. D.S.C. 1999) (<HOLDING>). In this case, Creditors have asked the Court
recognizing difference between tolling and equitable estoppel holding that ina  242bc3as time bar is not jurisdictional and thus subject to equitable tolling holding that  242bc3as time bar is not jurisdictional and thus subject to equitable tolling holding that the timely filing of an eeoc charge is subject to waiver estoppel and equitable tolling holding that the time bar imposed by bankruptcy rule 4007c is an affirmative defense subject to waiver estoppel and equitable tolling