facts absent from the record. Further, it was Westbrook who bore the burden of proof on this issue and who was responsible for making a record to support his position on this issue. As noted above, even though Westbrook testified as to his limited reading skills,' the Commission’s order was based on Westbrook’s failure to seek assistance even though he knew he disagreed with the determination. The record reflects that Westbrook waited more than five weeks after a Deputy with the Division denied Westbrook’s claim before he went to the unemployment office to check his status, which was nine days past the deadline for filing his appeal. The totality of this evidence supports the Commission’s order. The Commission’s order is consistent with a number of decisions. See Todaro, 660 S.W.2d 763 (<HOLDING>); Byers, 402 S.W.3d 605 (holding that claimant
holding that the defendant did not establish good faith as a matter of law holding that claimant did not establish good cause by showing he was unable to comprehend the determination holding that claimant must show good cause for failure to submit evidence to alj and appeals council holding that claimant did not establish good cause because she erroneously thought the determination was not final holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause