the contract. Both the evaluation panel memorandum and the selection criteria memorandum to the selection official ad'dress the conditions in YRTSC’s application, which NPS officials termed unsatisfactory conditions. The evaluation memorandum states: YRT’s ‘assumption’ that plan implementation and contributions be renegotiated for any change in operations occasioned by implementation of each component of the Concession Services Plan or the Housing Plan is not an acceptable condition. [Emphasis added.] We conclude that the present value of the proposer’s contribution to the CIF would be approximately $65.7 million over the life of the contract. This translates to an average percentage of 6.1% of the present value of gross receipts. Considering only the first four years of the contract (<HOLDING>), the proposer’s offer was $7.0 million. This
recognizing that shall will and must are all mandatory terms holding that an action construing a will creating a trust is equitable in nature recognizing exception recognizing that nps will renegotiate the cif percentage recognizing the equitable maxim that once equity has jurisdiction it will grant complete relief