a B-2 visa have “a residence in a foreign country which he has no intention of abandoning and [that he be] visiting the United States tempo Felix, 601 F.2d at 464. Because petitioner entered the United States in October 1978 on a B-2 visa, his lawful domicile did not commence at that time. He has not shown that his legal status changed prior to his becoming a permanent resident in June 1982 so as to render lawful his intent to remain in the United States. We conclude, therefore, that the Board of Immigration Appeals correctly held that petitioner’s lawful domicile began on June 24, 1982. B. The immigration judge held that petitioner’s lawful domicile terminated on May 28, 1987, when the INS issued the Show Cause Order in this case. See Ballbe v. INS, 886 F.2d 306, 309 (11th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>) cert. denied, 495 U.S. 929, 110 S.Ct. 2166,
holding that issuance of an order to show cause satisfied this requirement holding that summons issued nearly seven months after the show cause order was entered was not issued immediately as required by statute holding that lawful domicile terminates when show cause order is issued holding that where the trial court has issued a recent order to show cause on a pending pleading mandamus relief is not warranted holding that a deportation proceeding commenced after an order to show cause issued