operated by the lessee, the company would be considered to “derive revenue from” the business activity conducted by the lessee. Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President, again I agree with the chairman of the Finance Committee. The language of the statute is purposely broad. Certainly, a company would be considered to be in business if it continued to own significant properties and has leased some of those properties so that it may derive revenue from the business operation of the leased properties by the lessee. 138 Cong. Rec. 34,034-35 (1992). ny that had constructive possession over its revenue-generating assets remains “in business” within the meaning of the Act); United Mine Workers of Am.1992 Benefit Plan v. Rushton (In re Sunnyside Coal Co.), 146 F.3d 1273, 1279-80 (10th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. Barnhart,
holding that a case under the declaratory judgments act remains a live controversy even if all requests for substantive declaratory relief become moot during the actions pendency as long as a claim for attorneys fees under the act remains pending holding that a company that entered into liquidation remains in business for purposes of the act holding that denial of class certification is not a judgment for purposes of the antiinjunction act while the underlying litigation remains pending holding that in pennsylvania there is a rule that proof of the ownership of a business vehicle involved in an accident raises a presumption that the operation of the automobile was for the owners business purposes holding that a company that derived revenue from leasing its property was in business for purposes for the coal act