pattern analysis must be extracted by puncturing the skin and withdrawing body fluids. Schmerber clearly requires a warrant for that forced blood extraction, unless probable cause combines with exigent circumstances such as the dissipation of blood alcohol evidence. In addition, DNA genetic pattern analysis is even more intrusive than the blood alcohol test, discussed in Schmerber and Skinner, which revealed only the current blood levels of alcohol and other behavior-altering substances. DNA genetic pattern analysis catalogs uniquely private genetic facts about the individual that should be subject to rigorous confidentiality requirements even broader than the protection of an individual’s medical records. See Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 599, 97 S.Ct. 869, 876, 51 L.Ed.2d 64 (1977) (<HOLDING>). Conversely, individuals have a categorically
holding that an inmate had no liberty interest in avoiding transfer to a more restrictive facility recognizing that the states interest in preventing the premature release of individuals who have already proven their dangerousness to society by committing a criminal act outweighs the acquittees interest in avoiding continued confinement recognizing interest in avoiding exposure to animals killed by hunters recognizing limits on an individuals right to privacy and requiring the government to move a compelling interest only if there will be disclosure of protected information recognizing the individuals interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters