on-the-scene witnesses, and/or other police officers. Because the officer's affidavit, interpreted in a realistic and common-sense fashion, shows that the challenged information was obtained in a way that satisfies the Aguilar-Spinelli test, we uphold Judge Henry's denial of Moberg's suppression motion. Conclusion The judgement of the district court is AFFIRMED. 1 . Anchorage Municipal Code § 09.28.020. 2 . State v. Mouser, 806 P.2d 330, 336 (Alaska App.1991); York v. State, 757 P.2d 68, 70 (Alaska App.1988). 3 . Catlett v. State, 585 P.2d 553, 557-58 (Alaska 1978); Torres v. State, 519 P.2d 788, 795-97 (Alaska 1974). 4 . See Anchorage v. Serrano, 649 P.2d 256, 258 n. 5 (Alaska App.1982). 5 . St. John, 715 P.2d at 1211. See also Russell v. Anchorage, 706 P.2d 687, 693 (Alaska App.1985) (<HOLDING>). 6 . St. John, 715 P.2d at 1212. 7 . Id. 8 .
holding that denial of an independent chemical test after defendant refused to submit to a policeadministered test did not violate due process holding presumption of paternity that applies to intact family prevented an order by the court for a blood test or the use of privately obtained blood test to rebut the presumption of legitimacy holding blood test taken for independent medical purpose is not same as blood test taken pursuant to section 3755a holding that a defendants right to an independent blood alcohol test means the right to a test that is not subject to government manipulation holding that the fourth amendment is implicated by the withdrawal of blood to test its alcohol content