but reverse that part of the probation order that included a special condition of probation that was not orally pronounced at sentencing. Condition twelve of the order of probation provides that the appellant will submit to urinalysis, breathalyzer, or blood tests at any time. The last line of condition twelve states “[y]ou shall be required to pay for the tests unless payment is waived by your officer.” However, the last line was not orally pronounced at sentencing. The appellant filed a rule 3.800(b) motion, wherein he contends that the trial court he pay for alcohol and drug testing, is a special condition of probation that must be pronounced orally in order to be properly imposed on a probationer. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.986 (2003); Cumbie v. State, 597 So.2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)(<HOLDING>). Accordingly, this case must be remanded to
recognizing that condition requiring submission to search by probation officer need not be orally pronounced because warrantless searches are necessary for proper supervision of probationers citing brown 697 so2d at 929 recognizing that before a special condition of probation may be imposed there must be an oral pronouncement of the condition at sentencing holding special conditions of probation must be imposed at sentencing and may not be imposed at resentencing holding that the requirement that a defendant pay for drug testing is a special condition of probation which must be pronounced at sentencing holding that all special conditions of probation must be orally pronounced at sentencing