himself, rather than any credible information given in the past. Both agents also testified that they told Judge Maxey that the residence mentioned in the underlying facts where drugs were brought into was a Lowndes County residence and that they told the judge of the raid on the Northington apartment and the documents discovered there that allegedly linked Logan and Northington in a conspiracy to distribute drugs. Opinion at 739. We, therefore, agree with the district court’s determination that the evidence in question satisfies Leon’s good-faith exception. B. The Alleged Violation of Stanley’s Right to Counsel Once an accused invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel, all interrogation must cease. See Minnick v. Mississippi, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 486, 112 L.Ed.2d 489 (1990) (<HOLDING>); Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444-48, 86
holding that there was a restraint of movement to the degree associated with formal arrest when juvenile went to stationhouse for interview but magistrate read defendant his mircmda warnings defendants grandmother was excluded from interview despite her request and defendant was alone in locked interrogation room with armed officer holding that videotaped interview between child and investigator was admissible holding that since petitioner made specific request for counsel before interview policeinitiated interview was impermissible holding that a videotaped interview between the child and an investigator was admissible holding suspect must unambiguously request counsel before applying rule established in edwards that police questioning must cease once suspect requests counsel during interview