of review and applicable law Section 37.011 of the Declaratory Judgments Act allows for “[fjurther relief based on a declaratory judgment” upon a showing that the relief is “necessary or proper.” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 37.011. Ancillary injunctive relief may be obtained when the evidence establishes that a defendant will not comply with a declaratory judgment. Howell v. Tex. Workers’ Comp. Comm’n, 143 S.W.3d 416, 433 (Tex.App.-Austin 2004, pet. denied). The granting or denial of a request for a permanent injunction is within the trial court’s sound discretion, and a reviewing court’s inquiry is limited to the question whether the trial court abused its discretion. See Lakeside Realty, Inc. v. Life Scape Homeowners Ass’n, 202 S.W.3d 186, 190 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); see also Jim Rutherford Invs., Inc. v.
holding that the standard of review for an award of statutory damages is even more deferential than an abuse of discretion standard holding that the standard of review under rule 60 is abuse of discretion holding that the appropriate standard of review is abuse of discretion holding that abuse of discretion is the proper standard of review for an order denying relief under section 37011 holding that the standard of review is abuse of discretion and an appeal from denial of rule 60b relief does not bring up the underlying judgment for review