other circuit courts of appeal hold that LSC decisions “are subject to the pre-APA requirement that administrative decisions be rationally based_” Id. (citing, among others, Spokane County Legal Services, 614 F.2d at 669 & n. 11). Courts have, often reasoned that this rational basis test is no different than the APA standards for agency review by the courts: that agency decisions be based on substantial evidence and not be arbitrary and capricious. National Clients Council, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp., 617 F.Supp. 480, 485-86 (D.D.C.1985); see also Texas Rural Legal Aid, 940 F.2d at 697 (finding that pre-APA rational basis test is equivalent to the APA’s arbitrary and capricious standard); National Ctr. for Youth Law v. Legal Services Corp., 749 F.Supp. 1013, 1016 (N.D.Cal.1990) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, this court will look to the APA
holding that court may set aside lsc decisions that are arbitrary and capricious or are not based on substantial evidence holding an authority ruling may only be set aside if arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law holding that an agencys decision is to be set aside only if it is arbitrary capricious an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law  recognizing a nonstatutory basis for setting aside an arbitration award if it is arbitrary and capricious holding that bcmr decisions are subject to judicial review by federal courts and can be set aside if they are arbitrary capricious or not based on substantial evidence quoting chappell v wallace 462 us 296 303 103 sct 2362 76 led2d 586 1983 alterations in original