a place not traditionally open to assembly and debate as a public forum,” id. (internal citations omitted); and (2) the nature of the property and its compatibility with expressive activity, Air Line Pilots Ass’n, Intern., 45 F.3d at 1152. “Other government properties are either nonpublic fora or not fora at all.” Arkansas Educ. Television Comm’n v. Forbes, 523 U.S. 666, 677, 118 S.Ct. 1633, 140 L.Ed.2d 875 (1998). “In distinguishing between designated and nonpublic forums .. .the more selective the government is. in restricting access to its property, the more likely that property wül be considered a nonpublic forum,” Id. at 565. Here, the Seventh - Circuit has established that the interior of a Courthouse is a nonpublic forum. See Sefick v. Gardner, 164 F.3d 370, 372 (7th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); see also Braun, 346 F.3d at 762 (“Newspapers
holding that the courthouse lobby was a nonpublic forum holding that an enclosed forecourt to a performing arts center is a nonpublic forum holding that a courthouse was a nonpublic forum but an unenclosed courthouse plaza was a designated public forum holding that the fact that a speech regulation is now being enforced  is not enough to convert the property into a nonpublic forum recognizing that where plaintiff is from the forum state and defendant is from an alternate forum each forum can claim a connection to one of the parties