is not less than the amount such holder would receive in a Chapter 7 liquidation. 8. 11 U.S.C. § 1129(a)(8): Each class of claims and interests has either accepted the Amended Plan or are subject to the cramdown provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b). Section 1129(a)(8) is satisfied with respect to the claims in Classes 1 and 2 because these impaired classes have voted to accept the Amended Plan. [Findings of Fact Nos. 42 & 43.] The Court also concludes that Section 1129(a)(8) is satisfied with respect to the claims in Classes 3 and 4 because, although these classes are impaired, they are deemed to have accepted the Amended Plan because neither Class 3 nor Class 4 has submitted a valid ballot or lodged a valid objection. In re Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc., 836 F.2d 1263, 1266-67 (10th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). The Court acknowledges that some bankruptcy
holding that the failure to object to an instruction constitutes a waiver of error holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver holding that a creditors failure to vote or to object to a chapter 11 plan constitutes acceptance of the plan holding that the good faith analysis for evaluating a chapter 11 petition and that in evaluating a chapter 11 plan are distinct holding that plan language giving plan administrator power to determine which employees are eligible to participate in the plan and providing all parties dealing with the plan an interpretation of plan provisions on request indicates deferential standard of review of trustee eligibility decisions