Community corrections centers are residences in the community with custodial structure and strong emphasis on guidance and counseling. These centers serve those inmates who qualify and who should benefit from a gradual reintegration into society. 6 . Section 21.1a was added by Section 5 of the Act of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1401, as amended, 61 P.S. § 331.21a. 7 . The Court noted that while a convict may be on parole from a particular offense, he might be confined in prison for another offense, in a mental institution or in an enemy prison camp during a war. While not literally “at liberty,” that parolee would not be entitled to credit on his sentence for these types of confinement. 8 . See also Wagner v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 846 A.2d 187 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) (<HOLDING>). 9 . See also McMillian v. Pennsylvania Board
holding that where the plaintiffs evidence supported a finding that the defendants had applied force to restrain him the jury must determine not only whether the officers were justified in using force at all but if so whether the degree of force actually used was reasonable holding that time spent at a facility was not the functional equivalent of incarceration where no force would be used to restrain anyone who left without permission and where staff members were counselors and not law officers holding that there was no actual prejudice where the defendant has the functional equivalent of the notice required holding that pennsylvania national guard members could be used for civilian law enforcement because they were not in federal service at the time holding that defining the class to include anyone who received such a call without prior express consent means that only those potential members who would prevail on this liability issue would be members of the class