8, 2008. “[W]hen an appellate court affirms a trial court’s judgment, that judgment then becomes the judgment of both courts.” Cook v. Cameron, 733 S.W.2d 137, 139 (Tex.1987); see also Dallas County v. Sweitzer, 971 S.W.2d 629, 630 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.) (“The trial court’s only duty is to enforce thé judgment as rendered.... Its only authority is to carry out the mandate of the appellate court.”)(internal citations omitted). An appellate court’s judgment is final not only in reference to the matters actually litigated, but as to all other matters that the parties might have litigated and decided in the case. Martin v. Credit Prot. Ass’n Inc., 824 S.W.2d 254, 257 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 1992, writ dism’d w.o.j.); see also Lake v. Lake, 899 S.W.2d 737 (Tex.App.-Dallas, 1995, no writ) (<HOLDING>). Once our opinion and judgment have issued,
holding that trial court could not go beyond appellate courts mandate and consider appellants claim for attorneys fees on remand holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction to review the merits of the case because only the collateral issue of attorneys fees remained to be decided on remand to the bankruptcy court holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees holding appellate courts must consider the trial courts jury charge as a whole holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees