decision in A.E. v. Christean, 938 P.2d 811 (Utah Ct.App.1997), the juvenile court erred by combining the permanency hearing with the termination hearing. However, Parents' reliance on A.E. is misplaced. In AE., this court held Children "17 Parents claim that the juvenile court erred by giving the State permission to allow psychiatric treatment and medication for the children. There is no indication that Parents properly preserved their objection to the medication order. Again Rule 24 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure requires appellant's brief to contain "citation to the record showing that the issue was preserved in the trial court" Utah R.App. P. 24(a)(5)(A). No such citation was provided in this case. See Hart v. Salt Lake County Comm'n, 945 P.2d 125, 130 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (<HOLDING>). Here, the permanency order is being appealed;
holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review claims that have not been raised before the bia holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review legal arguments not raised before the bia holding appellate court lacks jurisdiction if party does not preserve claim by first raising it before trial court holding a general ruling by the trial court is insufficient to preserve a specific issue for appellate review holding that appellant failed to preserve error because it did not present appellate complaint to trial court