the same crime, under Blockburger there is a presumption that multiple punishments can be assessed. Aguiar-Corona, 508 N.W.2d at 701. The trial court did not violate double jeopardy principles in submitting these two offenses to the jury, nor did it err when it invoked a punishment for each offense. Douglas’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is without merit. Douglas argues Iowa Code section 708.2A(2)(e) (domestic abuse assault) demonstrates a clear legislative intent not to allow multiple punishments for a domestic abuse assault and a more serious offense such as attempted murder. This section limits its application if the sections relating to terrorism (section 708.6) or going armed with intent (section 708.8) apply. This statutory exclusion does not include attempted mu (<HOLDING>). 3 . Moreover, judicial participation in a
holding abuse of discretion is established if district court decision was based on an error of law holding it was not an abuse of discretion to exclude testimony holding that the judges restriction of the class was not an abuse of discretion holding judges statement at bond review hearing that defendant was obviously guilty of something was based on minutes of testimony and although illadvised did not constitute an abuse of discretion holding the immigration judges denial of a continuance request did not constitute an abuse of discretion