far more than the building demolition called for by the project. Despite the completion of the Wal-Mart complex and other edifices, significant projected construction and renovation remain unfinished. Plaintiffs’ requested relief — declaratory judgments invalidating the existing MOA as well as the environmental assessment and FONSI, plus injunctions halting construction and requiring preparation of a proper and legal MOA and environmental assessment — could, if granted, eliminate or alleviate a multitude of their expressed environmental and historical preservation concerns. • Accordingly, we conclude that the case is not moot and proceed to consider the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. Cf. Benavides v. Housing Authority of City of San Antonio, Tex., 238 F.3d 667, 670 (5th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); Bayou Liberty Ass’n v. U.S. Army Corps, 217
holding that the plaintiffs claim was moot because the construction project which was the subject of the dispute had been completed holding that complaint seeking to enjoin highway construction project pending completion of environmental impact statement for larger project no longer presented any live controversy after highway project was completed and thus was moot and provided no basis for federal court jurisdiction holding plaintiffs appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction moot where defendants directive no longer in effect holding a demolition project to be moot where demolition was only 55 complete but had progressed to the point where units were no longer habitable holding that the case was not moot even though claims for injunctive and declaratory relief were no longer alive because the plaintiff had requested pecuniary relief