CURIAM. Alfonso Jenkins petitions this Court for a writ of habeas corpus. This Court ordered Jenkins to show cause why he should not be prohibited from filing successive pro se motions in this Court. See Carter v. State, 1 So.3d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008) (<HOLDING>). After considering Jenkins’ response to this
holding that a defendant proceeding pro se is bound by same rules as party represented by counsel and a court cannot allow pro se litigant lower standard of performance holding that pro se pleadings will be liberally construed holding a court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant notice and an opportunity to respond holding that pro se pleadings are to be liberally construed holding that a pro se litigant who is an attorney is not entitled to fees under  1988