34] Even if the confession was newly discovered, Cookson did not show clearly and convincingly that it would, have changed the outcome of the trial. The motion court found that Vantol’s confession was not credible. This finding is supported by the evidence of the versions of the confession that Vantol made to the defense team and to the police; Vantol’s visits to Cookson in jail and the timing of those visits; Vantol’s recantation; and his mental and psychological characteristics. Furthermore, the version of Vantol’s confession that he gave to the police implicated Cookson in a murder for hire scheme, which, as the trial court noted at Cook-son’s sentencing, would have made Cook-son guilty of murder and supported a life sentence. See State v. Shortsleeves, 580 A.2d 145, 149 (Me.1990) (<HOLDING>). 3. Murder Weapon [¶ 35] Cookson has also
holding the same nevada aggravating circumstance unconstitutionally vague under godfrey holding that a sentencing judge sitting without a jury may not find an aggravating circumstance necessary for imposition of the death penalty holding sentence of life imprisonment resulting from a wrongful killing caused by the use of an automobile is not cruel and unusual punishment holding that an aggravating circumstance that justifies a life sentence is a planned deliberate killing including a killing for hire holding that an aggravating circumstance in the georgia death penalty statute was unconstitutionally vague