was likely. See Underwood, 414 Mass, at 100, 605 N.E.2d 832. The court held that a “suspicion or a likelihood” of a problem “rather than knowledge” could not amount to a violation of chapter 93A. Id. Similarly here, the record shows, at most, that defendants knew that 'chemicals had been dumped into the Valley Mill Landfill, and that there was some “potential” for the chemicals to leach into the surrounding water table. Plaintiff has produced no showing of actual contamination of the wells until the 1997 study, thirteen years after the sale. Thus, the asserted misconduct amounts to a failure to disclose a potential problem, not a present and actual one, and does not rise to the level of a chapter 93A violation. See id.; see also Greenery, 36 Mass.App.Ct. at 78-79, 628 N.E.2d 1291 (<HOLDING>). Additionally, even if the nondisclosure here
holding that sellers failure to disclose known soil conditions was not a scheme to defraud where seller did not affirmatively lie to buyer holding that failure to disclose that the defendant was involved on both the sellers and buyers side of transactions constitutes a concealment of a material fact sufficient to support a charge of fraud holding that sellers failure to disclose possibility that tenant corporation might go into default not actionable because was predictive insight and therefore was nondisclosure of opinion rather than of fact holding that a buyer could not rely on a sellers mere expression of opinion holding that duty to disclose not neutralized because evidence was in the hands of the police rather than the prosecutor