on the large number of contradictions about fairly insignificant facts in the testimony to bolster his allegation of error. But this Court is not in the business of retrying cases; the ultimate fact-finder in a criminal trial must remain the jury. The jury heard all of the evidence, and witnessed the demeanor of the witnesses, as well as the give and take of the trial process. We will not substitute our judgment for that of the jury unless great injustice may result from an absolute misreading of the evidence, a situation which has not arisen here, particularly given the fact that Morris’s own statement inculpated him in the assaults. ¶ 12. It is settled that the jury may freely believe and disbelieve testimony to reach a verdict. See Groseclose v. State, 440 So.2d 297, 300 (Miss.1983) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. State, 512 So.2d 666, 670
holding jurors are the sole arbiters of witness credibility holding that jurors may consider inconsistencies and deficiencies in testimony when assessing witness credibility holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility holding that promises made by the prosecution to a witness in exchange for that witness testimony relate directly to the credibility of the witness holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses