does not expose noncontraband items that otherwise would remain hidden from public view - during a lawful traffic stop, generally does not implicate legitimate privacy interests”) (citation and punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied); Simmons, 283 Ga. App. at 143 (“[t]he use of a drug sniffing dog to conduct a free air search around the exterior of a vehicle during the course of a lawful traffic stop does not implicate the Fourth Amendment under the United States Constitution”) (punctuation omitted). 13 The entire stop, from the moment the officers first spoke to St. Fleur to the moment he was arrested, took approximately eight minutes. See Salmeron v. State, 280 Ga. 735, 737 (1) (632 SE2d 645) (2006); Hayes, 292 Ga. App. at 731 (2) (e) (ten-minute delay); Wilson, 293 Ga. App. at 138 (<HOLDING>); Davidson v. State, 257 Ga. App. 260, 264 (1)
holding that a threeminute delay between the completion of a traffic citation and the retrieval of a drug dog did not impermissibly extend the detention at a traffic stop holding that a traffic stop is valid under the fourth amendment if the stop is based on an observed traffic violation or if the police officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that a traffic or equipment violation has occurred or is occurring holding that a traffic stop is reasonable under the fourth amendment when police have probable cause to believe a traffic infraction has occurred holding that a dog sniff of the outside of a car subsequent to a valid traffic stop did not constitute a search holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop