ample provision for the education of all children residing within the State’s borders, the constitution has created a “duty” that is supreme, preeminent or dominant. Flowing from this constitutionally imposed “duty” is its jural correlative, a correspondent “right” permitting control of another’s conduct. Id. at 511-12 (footnotes omitted). ¶30 The unique stature of the positive right under article IX should cause us to look carefully before repeating general precepts of constitutional interpretation from other contexts. In the typical case in which legislation is challenged on constitutional grounds, the question is whether the legislature has overstepped the bounds of its authority or impermissibly encroached on a recognized individual liberty. See, e.g., Island County, 135 Wn.2d 141 (<HOLDING>). In contrast, protection of a positive or
holding pennsylvania replevin statute unconstitutional holding statute authorizing creation of community councils in certain counties was unconstitutional special law holding that in certain circumstances fraud can be prosecuted under the statute holding the illinois statute unconstitutional as violating a special legislation proscription holding that the minorinpossessionofafirearm statute because it was limited to juveniles in maricopa and pima counties was a special or local law that violated ariz const art 4 pt 2  197