from the trust estate and, in his sole discretion to accumulate such income as a trust asset or to pay such income to the Grantor individually and not in any fiduciary capacity. The Grantor further reserves the power and right during [the] life of the Grantor to mortgage or pledge all or any part of the trust estate as collateral for any loan.” [¶ 26] We agree in part with the district court regarding the trust’s assets at A.G. Edwards. Based upon the plain language of the power of attorney and the trust agreement, Fritz intended for Simon-son and Gifford to each separately have “actual authority” to withdraw trust assets, as Fritz had reserved this power for himself as the grantor. See, e.g., Bank IV, Olathe v. Capitol Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 250 Kan. 541, 828 P.2d 355, 364-65 (1992) (<HOLDING>). The district court therefore did not err in
holding that a healthcare power of attorney conferred by a resident to his wife explicitly limited the powers of the agent to those set out in writing in the document holding that  340c rather than the threeyear statute of limitations in california commercial code  4111 applies to claims by depositors against their bank for payment of forged checks written on the depositors accounts holding that an attorneyinfact acting under a limited power of attorney recorded prior to the mortgage it sought to foreclose did not violate minnstat  58005 holding that even where an attorney exercises broad powers to represent a client in litigation these powers of representation alone do not create a specific authority to receive service holding durable power of attorney conferred broad powers sufficient to authorize savings and loan association to issue checks for depositors funds to an attorneyinfact personally at the attorneyinfacts request