Ga. App. 124, 126 (1) (192 SE2d 513) (1972) (“Where it appears from the evidence that the goods have some value, a plea of total failure of consideration has not been sustained____” (citations omitted)); Anchor Sign Co. of Ga., Inc. v. PS Heating &Air Conditioning Co., 125 Ga. App. 207, 207 (186 SE2d 892) (1971) (“The evidence showed that there had not been a total failure of consideration because the defendant had attained a benefit from the use of the air-conditioning unit. Therefore, the defendant’s only defense would have been a partial failure of consideration.”); Herrman & Henican v. De LaPerriere, 56 Ga. App. 749, 751 (194 SE 42) (1937) (“The defendant would also be entitled to a verdict in his favor if it appeared from competent evidence and to the satisfa 246 SE2d 408) (1978) (<HOLDING>). 11 Pepsico Truck Rental, Inc. v. E. Foods,
holding that the transfer of stock in an insolvent corporation did not constitute fair consideration to support conveyance of property to its stockholder holding when defendant raised affirmative defense of total failure of consideration that even assuming the acquired stock became worthless the worthlessness of the stock did not constitute a failure of consideration when in exchange for note defendant received 2500 shares of stock   as well as all the rights privileges and benefits of a shareholder director and officer emphasis supplied punctuation omitted holding in a class action suit that owning stock in a corporation creates a sufficient nexus between a nonresident shareholder and the jurisdiction of incoiporation to bind him to a judicial determination of rights that attach to that stock eg does this class of stock have a right to vote including the right to hold fiduciaries to account providing that notice and opportunity to be heard are provided holding a shareholders cause of action accrued for statute of limitations purposes when shareholders and directors of a company asserted a right to stock which was hostile to the plaintiffs claim to the stock holding in action for breach of contract caused by wrongful foreclosure and sale of shares of stock plaintiff was entitled to recover the fair market value of the stock at the time of its sale