Overton was murdering the Maclvors. Overton’s counsel clearly did not want to pursue the alleged involvement of Hernandez because it would place Overton at the scene, which was totally inconsistent with the defense theory that Overton was not at the scene and that his DNA had been planted. Overton fails to include names of other suspects allegedly concealed. Due to law enforcement’s investigation of multiple suspects here, the failure to include identification of which suspects were allegedly not disclosed constitutes an insufficient pleading. See Gore, 846 So.2d at 466-67. Even if this sub-issue had been sufficiently pled, it is without merit as the record illustrates that nothing fruitful resulted from law enforcement’s investigation into other suspects. See Wright, 857 So.2d at 870 (<HOLDING>). The Brady claim as to missing pages from
holding that the alleged brady material was merely cumulative to the significant impeachment that already occurred during trial so there was no prejudice for a brady violation holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that the fbi informants file contained no brady material not already provided to the defendant in a summary holding that information of other conduct by the investigating police officer was not material under brady because the information would not have been admissible under fedrevid 608b as it would have been extrinsic evidence impeaching the witness on collateral matters holding that although the defendant was able to impeach the prosecution in certain respects the suppressed information was material under brady because there was a significant difference between the suppressed material and the information to which the defense had access holding that the information contained in the police files with regard to other possible suspects was not brady material