§ 3500(b)). The Jencks Act defines a “statement” as: (1) a written statement made by said witness and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by him; (2) a stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement made by said witness and recorded conte se its discretion in refusing to conduct an in camera inspection of the FBI 302s. The FBI 302s are notes of witness interviews that were transcribed by an FBI agent and not by the witnesses. The mere fact that the witnesses did not prepare the documents, however, is not dispositive of our Jencks Act inquiry; we must also consider whether any of the witnesses adopted or approved the notes. Kane v. United States, 431 F.2d 172, 174 (8th Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>); see also 18 U.S.C. § 3500(b)(1) (defining a
holding that the defendants due process rights were violated when the trial judge singled out the only defense witness and indicated to that witness that he expected the witness to he and would personally ensure that the witness was prosecuted for perjury and thereby effectively drove that witness off the stand holding that an fbi agents rough notes of an interview of the defendant were not brady material because there was no independent showing that they contained evidence that was material to the defendants guilt or innocence holding that an fbi agents notes were not a witness statement within the act because there was no evidence that the witness adopted or approved what was recorded holding that a police officers notes were relevant as prior and possibly inconsistent statements made and recorded by the witness holding that denying admission of police officers typewritten notes of witnesss statement was proper where witness never adopted statements as true and accurate