(11th Cir. 2006)). “The Bankruptcy Code provides that property of the debtor estate includes ‘all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.’ ” Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of PSA, Inc., 437 F.3d at 1149 (quoting 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1)). Ms. Herendeen could pursue the malpractice claim because it belonged to the estate upon filing of the Chapter 7 petition. Mandelbaum asserts that Mr. Hutchins was not damaged by the punitive damages award because the bankruptcy court discharged that debt. However, the discharge of Mr. Hutchins’ personal liability under the wrongful death judgment did not eliminate the debt of the bankruptcy estate. See Camp v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 616 So.2d 12, 15 (Fla. 1993); Stanley, 500 F.3d at 425 (<HOLDING>). But, Mandelbaum asserts, the bankruptcy
holding that effect of bankruptcy discharge under arizona law is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debtor holding that effect of discharge of debt under bankruptcy code is the same as it was under the 1898 bankruptcy act it is not an extinguishment of the debt but only a bar to enforcement of the debt as a personal obligation of the debt or holding that bankruptcy discharge eliminates only a debtors personal liability and not the debt itself and that a bankruptcy trustee stands in the shoes of the debtor and can bring a legal malpractice claim as trustee holding that trustee and personnel liability policy only covered the trustees and not the school itself holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee