as long as the children’s basic needs are met.... After divorce, although a parent may voluntarily terminate his or her employment, he or she may not do so to the detriment of support obligations to the children.”). Rather, as we held in regard to spousal support, any agreement of the parties was relevant insofar as it impacted not on Payne’s duty to support her children but her ability to do so, i.e., her earning capacity and ability to obtain full-time employment following the dissolution of the marriage. The commissioner, by way of his very detailed and lengthy report, clearly considered the relevant evidence pertaining to the necessary factors prior to making his determination concerning the child support award. See Head v. Head, 24 Va.App. 166, 178, 480 S.E.2d 780, 786-87 (1997) (<HOLDING>). Based upon the above, we find no abuse of
holding that although the trial courts failure to determine amount of fees does not render underlying order nonfinal the fee award itself is not reviewable until the amount is determined holding that the amount of water rights appurtenant to the land is the amount that is being used thereon before and at the time of the sale holding prejudgment interest is to be determined on the entire amount of compensatory damages and then reduced by the amount of interest which would have accrued at present value on the settlement amount determined before trial holding that when trial court orders restitution at sentencing pursuant to statute the defendant is entitled to notice of the amount claimed and the opportunity to dispute the amount holding that the presumptive amount is rebuttable and that the court may deviate from the presumptive amount if such amount is determined to be unjust or inappropriate in consideration of any relevant evidence pertaining to the factors set forth in code  201072 and 201081