summary judgment in favor of buyers where the contract to purchase property contained a condition precedent stating the contract was subject to the closing of the sale of the buyers’ current home.) The trial court found as fact that “[t]here is no evidence that Plaintiffs acted in bad faith in not satisfying the contingency.” While defendants assign error to this finding of fact, they do not challenge the accuracy of the finding, but rather argue that the trial court erred in making the finding at all because “there was no requirement in the contract that the Plaintiffs hád to act in ‘bad faith’ before they forfeited their deposit.” This finding of fact is thus binding on this Court on appeal. Static Control Components, Inc. v. Vogler, 152 N.C. App. 599, 603, 568 S.E.2d 305, 308 (2002) (<HOLDING>). Because plaintiffs have not acted in bad
holding the findings of fact required to support an alimony award are sufficient if findings of fact have been made on the ultimate facts at issue in the case and the findings of fact show the trial court properly applied the law in the case holding because defendant does not argue in his brief that these findings of fact are not supported by    evidence in the record this court is bound by the trial courts findings of fact holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence holding that findings of fact are conclusive if supported by clear and convincing competent evidence even where the evidence might support contrary findings recognizing appellate courts must not make fact findings