Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 52, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2641, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) (invalidating a statute requiring persons to produce identification to authorities on demand without reasonable suspicion). When a person is not reasonably suspected of any wrongdoing, the police have no right to detain him or her. See, e.g., Rodriguez, 945 P.2d at 1359. In People v. Thomas, 839 P.2d 1174 (Colo.1992), we set forth the standard for determining whether an encounter is consensual or is an unlawful detention: The test for determining if the encounter is a consensual one is whether a reasonable person under the circumstances would believe he or she was free to leave and/or to disregard the official’s request for information. Id. at 1177-78. See also People v. Padgett, 932 P.2d 810, 813 (Colo.1997) (<HOLDING>). Here, Paynter and his companion had no choice
holding that defendant was not free to leave when officer directed defendant to stay while he conducted a warrants check holding that accused was not in custody when told he was not under arrest and was free to leave and did in fact freely leave the interview holding that the defendant was placed in official detention when two police officers approached him and told him that he was under arrest as the defendant could not reasonably have believed that he was free to leave holding seizure occurred when police officer retained drivers license while making radio warrants check holding that once the officer asked the defendant to exit his vehicle the encounter became a stop because the defendant was no longer free to leave