by-laws was recorded in the Land Records office of Worcester County, Maryland. DISCUSSION I. Appellants contend that the hearing judge did not answer their claim that the council of unit owners had no authority to assign individual parking spaces. “In an action properly brought under the Declaratory Judgments Act, the court ordinarily must declare the rights of the parties in light of the issues raised.” Jennings v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 302 Md. 352, 355, 488 A.2d 166 (1985); see also Md.Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol.), § 3-406 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article. There is no error in dismissing an action when the trial judge declares in some detail in a written opinion the rights of each party. See Downing Dev. Corp. v. Brazelton, 253 Md. 390, 394, 252 A.2d 849 (1969) (<HOLDING>); Pope v. Sun Cab Co., 62 Md.App. 218, 488 A.2d
holding that dismissal of action was not error when written opinion delineated in some detail rights of parties and reasons for courts holding holding that a dismissal in the interest of justice was a favorable termination for the purposes of a malicious prosecution action where the courts reasons for dismissing the criminal charges were not inconsistent with the innocence of the accused holding that dismissal of some but not all claims or parties not immediately appealable absent rule 54b certification holding that plaintiffs dismissal of personal injury action and subsequent dismissal of declaratory judgment action concerning extent of tortfeasors insurance coverage did not trigger double dismissal rule holding dismissal for failure to comply with rule 8 was dismissal of entire action which was appealable final order