the events leading to DFPS’s investigation of A.D.’s ability to parent K.N.D. A.D. was injured in an altercation with her roommate or pimp while she was thirty-seven weeks pregnant, which endangered K.N.D. The violence A.D. was involved with immediately prior to KN.D.’s birth did more than threaten “metaphysical injury or the possible ill effects of a less-than-ideal family environment.” Tex. Dep’t of Human Servs. v. Boyd, 727 S.W.2d 531, 533 (Tex.1987). It exposed K.N.D. to loss or injury. See id.; see also Jordan v. Dossey, 325 S.W.3d 700, 723 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2010, pet. denied) (“ ‘To endanger’ means to expose a child to loss or injury or to jeopardize a child’s emotional or physical health.”); In re J.T.G., 121 S.W.3d 117, 125 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Green also testified that, both at the time
holding that courts may look to parental conduct both before and after childs birth to determine whether termination is appropriate that parents conduct need not be directed at child and that danger to childs wellbeing may be inferred from parental misconduct standing alone holding that abusive or violent conduct by a parent or other resident of the childs home supports conclusion that childs surroundings endanger his physical or emotional wellbeing holding that evidence of continued drug use after pregnancy may be conduct which endangers a childs wellbeing under section 1610011e holding harmless the improper admission of a social workers hearsay testimony concerning a childs report of sexual abuse where the credibility of the childs testimony was supported by other witnesses holding the mere act of relocating or separating a child from familiar surroundings by an otherwise fit and proper custodial parent against the childs wishes does not constitute abuse under the statutory definition and therefore does not render the child dependent