“narrowly tailored” when it does not “burden substantially more speech than is necessary to further the government’s legitimate interests.” Ward v. Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 799, 109 S.Ct. 2746, 105 L.Ed.2d 661 (1989). As a threshold matter, Appellants do not appear to dispute the District’s substantial interest in promoting the tourism industry and economy. The District attracts approximately fifteen million visitors each year and supports more than 66,000 tourism-related, full-time jobs, which generate some $2.6 billion in wages. See Edwards, 765 F.Supp.2d at 18. Undoubtedly, promoting a major industry that contributes to the economic vitality of the District is a substantial government interest. See Smith v. City of Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., 177 F.3d 954, 955-56 (11th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); Ctr. for Bio-Ethical Reform, Inc. v. City &
recognizing that the right of redemption is one of the most important rights provided by the states to owners of real property recognizing floridas substantial interest in promoting tourism  one of floridas most important economic industries recognizing that the third factor permanence is the most important holding that the most important consideration should be the existence of an antagonistic economic interest recognizing an overwhelming public interest in promoting improvement in health care through the mechanism of physician peer review