because of creditor's actual knowledge, despite court's failure to give 30 days notice of deadline for contesting dischargeability as required by Bankruptcy Rule 4007(c)); see also In re Medaglia, 52 F.3d 451, 454 (2d Cir.1995) (formal notice was not required to render claim dis-chargeable under § 523(a)(3)(B)); In re Alton, 837 F.2d 457, 460 (11th Cir.1988) ("mere knowledge of a pending bankruptcy proceeding is sufficient to bar the claim of a creditor who took no action, whether or not that creditor received official notice”). 9 . La. Civ.Code art. 246. 10 . Id. art. 250. 11 . Hall v. Courtney, 184 La. 80, 165 So. 458, 462 (1936). 12 . La.Code Civ. Proc. art. 4061.1(A)(2); id. art. 4262. 13 . Matter of Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific R. Co., 788 F.2d 1280, 1283 (7th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); see also In re Harbaugh, 301 B.R. 317, 321
holding that debtors failure to list minor child as creditor precluded dischargeability of minors claim despite debtors listing of minors parent holding that minors claim was dischargeable because mother received notice of bankruptcy holding that the juvenile received inadequate notice of a hearing modifying his probation because he received no notice of the hearing or the reasons for it holding that property owner was not entitled to relief under cafra because he received notice and failed to properly file a claim recognizing that the applicant received notice from the plea form even though such notice was not required