first time on appeal under Rule 12(b)(2)). Therefore, we hold that Harrod did not waive his objection by failing to object before trial. C. Definition of “Similitude” The relevant paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 474(a) reads: Whoever has in his possession or custody, except under authority from the Secretary of the Treasury or other proper officer, any obligation or other security made or executed, in whole or in part, after the similitude of any obligation or other security issued under the authority of the United States, with intent to sell or otherwise use the same ... [i]s guilty of a class B felony. (Emphasis added). Harrod argues that “similitude” for “similitude” in counterfeiting cases, including § 474 cases. See, e.g., United States v. Cantwell, 806 F.2d 1463, 1470 (10th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Hall, 801 F.2d 356, 360 (8th
holding that only a district judge in the charging district and not a magistrate judge in that district may review the release order of a magistrate judge in the arresting district holding that the disputed issue with respect to the state law bar was properly submitted to the jury holding that court properly admitted bills physician testified were reasonable and reasonably necessarily incurred holding that the district judge properly submitted to the jury the question of whether uncut bills were counterfeit under  471 holding that jury has responsibility to determine whether repair bills represent necessary and reasonable expenses