4th DCA 1992); Wills v. Wills, 399 So.2d 1130, 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (Moore, J. dissenting) (and cases cited therein). Moreover, Florida courts do not recognize a claim for specific performance of a contract for visitation in favor of a non-parent. Nor does Florida recognize a child’s right to petition a Florida court to order his or her parent to permit visitation with third parties, especially where the “next friend” as-sertedly acting for the child is the third party. 649 So.2d at 271-72 (footnote omitted). In Lamaritata, a sperm donor and a recipient biological mother entered into a visitation agreement after the donor filed suit seeking visitation after the birth of the children at issue. The issue continued to b 92); cf. Lonon v. Ferrell, 739 So.2d 650, 652 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(<HOLDING>). Contracts purporting to grant visitation
recognizing right of fit parent to prevent visitation by grandparents which right can only be overridden by court based on evidence that the prevention of the visitation would harm the child holding that biological grandparents were statutory strangers to children following their adoption by stepfather statute authorizing grandparent visitation violated parents constitutional right to privacy holding that postadoption visitation of child who was adopted by grandparents on basis of biological parents unconditional consent was required to promote childs best interests recognizing that postadoption visitation limited to when adoptive parents are grandparents siblings or foster parents recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children