or point to any evidence showing why he might be entitled to avoid liability or offset the damages awarded the Bank entity, who is the current owner and lessor, based on his return of the vehicle to Randall Reed Ford, the former owner and lessor. Consequently, by failing to make any substantive analysis whatsoever, Tello has waived his contention that his return of the vehicle raised a fact issue sufficient to defeat the Bank’s claim for damages or offset its damages. See Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(h); Sunnyside Feedyard, 106 S.W.3d at 173; see also Nguyen v. Kosnoski, 93 S.W.3d 186, 188 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2002, no pet.) (finding appellant waived issue on appeal by failing to support argument with legal authority or references to the record); cf. Mex-Tex, Inc., 150 S.W.3d at 427 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, in response to the motion for
holding issue was waived when appellant identified issue in its opening brief but devoted less than one page of brief to it and provided no other argument and no citations holding that appellant abandoned argument by failing to argue it in body of brief holding that if an appellee raises an argument not addressed by the appellant in its opening brief the appellant may reply  citation omitted holding appellant did not waive argument by citing only one statute in its brief considering it was clear appellant was relying solely on this statute and no other authority was necessary holding that the appellant waived this argument