facts. Emanuel, 412 So.2d at 1189. ¶ 62. The State stresses that the record reflects that a competency hearing was held on April 3, 1998. Dr. Lott testified that he had interviewed Snow on September 12, and September 21, 1997 and was of the opinion that Snow was competent to stand trial. Dr. Lott also stated that, in addition to the ability to confer with his attorneys, Snow had a working knowledge of the legal process and exhibited “street savvy.” He testified that Snow understood that he faced charges of capital murder and escape and also understood how the trial would work. Finally, Snow told Dr. Lott that he trusted and could work with his attorneys. ¶ 63. The State submits that Snow did not in any way refute the finding by Dr. Lott. See generally Evans v. State, 725 So.2d 613, 660 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, the State urges that in finding
recognizing that a defense attorneys opinion on the clients competency or incompetency is an important but not dispositive factor for trial court to consider in its competency determination holding that the state does not have to prove a defendants competency to stand trial holding that competency standard for stand ing trial is same as standard for determining competency to waive right to counsel holding the statutory burden is on the defendant to prove he is incompetent to stand trial holding that failure to appoint a second expert to examine the defendants mental competency to stand trial is not fundamental error