Ashleigh reside with her grandparents on a temporary basis while the mother worked and obtained a college degree. This arrangement demonstrates the mother’s concern for the child’s well-being and not, as appellant contends, an indication that the mother waived her interest in the child. In closing we note that in all custody cases, trial courts have broad continuing jurisdiction to ensure the protection of children within the court’s jurisdiction and over matters related to the well-being of a child. Cf. Cone v. Cone, 62 So.2d 907 (Fla.1953). Further, if circumstances present themselves that question the safety of the minor child, any concerned party may seek the initiation of proceedings to protect the well-being of the child. See Schilling v. Wood, 532 So.2d 12 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988) (<HOLDING>). In addition, and, most importantly, trial
recognizing third partys right to initiate dependency proceedings under chapter 39 recognizing a right of access to civil proceedings recognizing that decision to initiate prosecution is immunized under imbler recognizing that a forum selection clause also applies to a nonsignatory third party where the third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract recognizing that private citizens do not have standing to initiate proceedings to enforce municipal zoning regulations