directly obtain information will weaken the bond between the State of Delaware and its citizens. Put simply, there is no nexus between the State’s purported objective and its practice of prohibiting noncitizens from obtaining public records. Accordingly, we conclude that the citizens-only provision of § 10003 violates the Privileges and Immunities Clause. IV. Pursuant to Article IV, section 2, a state may not discriminate against noncitizens with respe L.Ed. 449 (1871) (striking down Maryland state licensing scheme that imposed higher financial burden on noncitizens who sought to trade in goods manufactured outside of Maryland); but cf. Salem Blue Collar Workers Ass’n v. City of Salem, 33 F.3d 265, 270 (3d Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1152, 115 S.Ct. 1105, 130 L.Ed.2d 1071 (1995) (<HOLDING>). 4 . The State contends that the burden is
holding that privileges and immunities clause protected right of noncitizen to engage in construction work and noting that the pursuit of a common calling is one of the most fundamental of those privileges protected by the clause holding that direct public employment is not a right protected by the privileges and immunities clause holding that new hampshire policy which restricted practice of law by outofstate residents violated privileges and immunities clause holding that slaughter house cases remained good law and prevented a privileges and immunities challenge to a state licensinglaw holding that the right to have a hunting license is not fundamental under the privileges and immunities clause because access to elk hunting is not necessary to promote interstate harmony