with her about five times 'in the cotton-picking time” during the year 1937, that "[m]y father drew a knife on me and forced me to do that with him,” that "I was afraid of him,” and that "[appellant] told her he would kill her if she reported the matter to her folks”); Sanders v. State, 132 Tex.Crim. 25, 102 S.W.2d 208, 208 (1937) (complaining witness was an accomplice as a matter of law’despite her testimony "that she permitted [her father to have sexual' intercourse with her] because he threatened to whip her with a belt; that she did not say anything about it to any one for a long time; [and] that at the time of the alleged incestuous act she was a few months past the age of fifteen years”); Tate v. State, 77 S.W. 793, 795-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 1903) (Henderson, J., dissenting) (<HOLDING>); Marchbanks v. State, 125 Tex.Crim. 436, 68
holding that evidence was insufficient where the victim testified that she was awake and communicated her desire not to have sexual intercourse with the defendant holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination holding that a plaintiff could not proceed on her procedural due process claim brought under  1983 because she did not show that she had exhausted her state law remedies or alleged that those remedies were inadequate holding that complaining witnesss passive submission to her fathers act of carnal intercourse with her without her consent and that she failed to outcry or resist because she was frightened were insufficient to show she was not an accomplice