terms of these statutory provisions, this court and others have held that liability under section 1132(c)(1) is confined to the plan administrator and have rejected the contention that other parties, including claims administrators, can be held liable for the failure to supply participants with the plan documents they seek. Hightshue v. AIG Life Ins. Co., 135 F.3d 1144, 1149 (7th Cir.1998); Jones, 16 F.3d at 144; Gore v. El Paso Energy Corp. Long Term Disability Plan, 477 F.3d 833, 843-44 (6th Cir.2007); Ross v. Rail Car Am. Group Disability Income Plan, 285 F.3d 735, 743-44 (8th Cir.2002); Lee v. Burkhart, 991 F.2d 1004, 1010 (2d Cir.1993); McKinsey v. Sentry Ins., 986 F.2d 401, 403-05 (10th Cir.1993). See also Klosterman v. Western Gen. Mgmt., Inc., 32 F.3d 1119, 1122 (7th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>) (coll, cases dealing with section 1024(b)).
holding that one who is named in documents as plan administrator signs documents as plan administrator and assumes discretionary authority in the administration of the pension plan is a fiduciary holding that liability for failing to comply with requirements of 29 usc  1022b as to contents of spd falls solely on plan administrator holding that plan did not comply holding that because the spd at issue stated that it is made part of the group policy its terms were sufficient to find that the plan conferred discretion on the plan administrator holding that plan administrator of an erisa health plan did not have to anticipate the confusion of a plan participant