not err in granting Old Republic’s motion for directed verdict as to RM Kids’s claim for prejudgment interest. Decided June 29, 2016 Smith, Gambrell & Russell, Edward D. Burch, Jr., Edward H. Wasmuth, Jr., John R. Autry; Hey man & Sizemore, William B. Brown, for appellant. In summary, and for the foregoing reasons, in Case No. A16A0257, we conclude that the date for the purpose of measuring any loss by RM Kids was the date it foreclosed on the subject property, and we reverse the trial court’s ruling that the date of the loss was the date that Peachtree Bank closed on the subject loan. And because that erroneous ruling entirely governed the manner in which the case was tried, we must remand the case for retrial. Based on our ruling, Old Republ Ins. Co., 423 NW2d 521, 525 (Wis. 1988) (<HOLDING>); Green v. Evesham Corp., 430 A2d 944, 946
holding that the loss of trade secrets cannot be measured in money damages holding that an insured mortgagees loss under a title insurance policy cannot be measured until the note has not been repaid and the security for the mortgage is shown to be inadequate holding that a mortgageeinsureds loss cannot be determined unless the note is not repaid and the security for the mortgage proves inadequate holding that a mortgagee could enforce mortgage covenants requiring the mortgagors to keep the property free of encumbrances even after it foreclosed by advertisement and purchased the property for the full amount of the mortgage debt because the mortgage covenants concerned title to the mortgaged property rather than repayment of the debt holding that a mortgagees loss cannot he measured unless the underlying debt is not repaid and the security for the mortgage proves inadequate