stop, up until appellant’s arrest, took approximately twenty-two minutes. Appellant’s continued detention from when Officer Beauchamp gave appellant the warning citations until appellant’s arrest lasted approximately six minutes. Approximately three minutes elapsed between appellant’s refusal to permit a search of the rental car and the canine’s alert on the passenger door. At the time of appellant’s stop, Officer Beauchamp was a narcotics interdiction officer with Denton County, Texas. He had received special training in narcotics interdiction. The videotape of the stop and Officer Beauchamp’s testimony at the suppression hearing establish that he properly obtained additional information in the course of investigating appellant’s traffic violations. See Mohmed, 977 S.W.2d at 628 (<HOLDING>). This additional information caused him to
holding questions about a drivers purpose for traveling were reasonably related to a traffic stop for speeding recognizing relevance of information and that need for this information outweighs the burden to appellants holding that request for information concerning a drivers license ownership of a vehicle insurance information appellants destination and the purpose of a trip are all proper inquiries after a traffic violation stop holding officers mission includes ordinary inquiries incident to the traffic stop holding that request for license destination and purpose of trip within reasonable scope of detention