defenses to the existence or amount of its withdrawal liability, even a defense based solely on statutory interpretation.”); Robbins v. Chipman Trucking Inc., 1987 WL 13571, 1987 U.S.Dist. LEXIS 6208 (N.D.Ill.1987) (failure to initiate arbitration within statutory time periods results in waiver of right to have an arbitrator decide the question of waiver; also stating that under the previous opinion, “[o]nce the federal court finds that the employer has waived his right to contest the withdrawal amount in arbitration, the employer loses. We believe this was the intention of the MPPAA framers. To give the employer one chance to contest withdrawal liability and to give that chance in the arbitral setting.”); Bowers v. Compania Peruana De Vapores, S.A., 689 F.Supp. 215, 219 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (<HOLDING>); In re Metro Transp. Co., 82 B.R. 351 (Bkrtcy
holding that the governments failure to argue harmless error results in a waiver of the argument recognizing rule that failure to initiate arbitration within statutory time limits constitutes a waiver of the opportunity to do so however in that case the alleged employers filing of declaratory action tolled the statutory time frames holding failure to object in timely fashion at trial results in waiver of issue for appeal holding that failure to develop a legal argument supporting a claim results in waiver of the claim recognizing in dicta that failure to initiate arbitration results in waiver of defenses citing clinton engines