receipt of the notice to submit in writing any and all objections to the deductions to the director [of the department of corrections], who shall consider the objections prior to transmitting the deducted amount to the clerk of the district court.” Id. We think the legislature inserted the notice-and-opportunity-to-object language in section 904.702 to give the department of corrections authority to determine how a section 610A.l(l)(a) order for costs and attorney’s fees would be collected. Without such authority, the order might be unfair, or even confiscatory. As with the “reasonably able to pay” standard in criminal restitution, we think this authority is necessary to allow a section 610A.l(l)(a) order to pass constitutional muster. See State v. Love, 589 N.W.2d 49, 52 (Iowa 1998) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, when the district court orders a
holding the contract was not authorized by law holding that state liability only accrues as expressly authorized by law holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that courts may not tax expert witness fees against the losing party beyond the 30 per day authorized in 28 usc  1821b unless otherwise authorized by statute holding that 1 prisoners have protected property interest in prison allowance subject to deductions authorized in iowa code section 904702 and 2 department has discretion in allocating the allowances but may make only those deductions authorized by statute