as are other similar terms such as “bar,” “lounge,” “pub,” “saloon,” or “tavern.” All serve alcohol alone or both food and alcohol. B Although AHM devotes less attention to its trade dress argument, it nevertheless maintains that Raleigh Ale House violated AHM’s rights in its trade dress, both as to the exterior and interior appearance of its facilities. At oral argument, however, when AHM was confronted with the observation that the exterior appearances of its .various facilities differed significantly in shape, size, style, color, and materials, AHM appeared to abandon its claim with respect to the exterior and to press only its claim that it had a proprietary interest in the appearance of the interior of its facilities, including its service. See Ashley Furniture, 187 F.3d at 370 (<HOLDING>); Fuddruckers, Inc. v. Doc’s B.R. Others, Inc.,
holding that because the prohibition on official torture is clear and unambiguous it can serve as a basis for suit under the ats holding that the defendants failure to timely serve a notice of appeal and docketing statement did not prejudice the plaintiff and therefore would not serve as a basis to dismiss the appeal holding that crab house is a generic term referring to a class of restaurants that serve crabs holding that a choice of law provision in a lease did not serve as a basis for jurisdiction recognizing that a restaurants design and decor may serve as the basis for a tradedress suit