The term “lunchtime” is commonly understood to mean the midday meal, associated with noon. Thus, Sergeant Darby’s choice of 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. comports with the “lunchtime” mandate. The “lunchtime” designation provided the field officers with a standard. Additionally, the standard was more restrictive than that in Crouch. We find that Sergeant Darby’s choice of an 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. time frame would not subject an individual to an arbitrary invasion of his reasonable expectation of privacy. See Brown, 443 U.S. at 50, 99 S.Ct. at 2640. Nothing in the record suggests the decision to execute the checkpoint during those hours involved an effort “to target a specific person or a specific group of people.” Sheppard v. Commonwealth, 25 Va.App. 527, 532, 489 S.E.2d 714, 717 (1997) (<HOLDING>). Sergeant Darby was merely following
holding that insured substantially complied with the manner of changing the beneficiary as required by the policy holding that a contractor who had substantially complied with the building specifications substantially performed holding that whether attorney complied with fiduciary duty to disclose all material information was question of fact holding that a checkpoint employed neutral criteria and thus complied with lowe and simmons holding that statements made at a suppression hearing are under simmons admissible at sentencing