to the trustee and are not claims derivative of the debtor’s own rights. Allegaert v. Perot, 548 F.2d 432, 436 (2d Cir.1977); Hagerstown Fiber Ltd. P’ship v. Carl C. Landegger, 277 B.R. 181 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2002) (granting motion to compel arbitration of fraud claims, but not fraudulent transfer claims brought pursuant to section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code). In Allegaert, the district court granted the defendants’ motion to stay the trustee’s action against 20 defendants and required that the claims be arbitrated. The trustee’s complaint included fraudulent transfer claims brought under the Bankruptcy Act and various claims for alleged securities violations. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, specifically conc uth, Inc., 473 U.S. 614, 105 S.Ct. 3346, 87 L.Ed.2d 444 (1985) (<HOLDING>); MBNA Am. Bank, N.A. v. Hill, 436 F.3d 104,
holding that claims under the securities act of 1933 were arbitrable under a predispute arbitration agreement holding that antitrust claims arising out of an international commercial transaction were arbitrable despite the fact that they were not specifically mentioned in the arbitration clause holding that tort claims were arbitrable because they arose out of and were related to contract holding that antitrust claims were arbitrable under a broad arbitration clause even though the claims concerned matters beyond the making of a particular contract between the parties and the performance of its terms holding a challenge of unconscionability to the whole contract as opposed to the arbitration provision specifically is an arbitrable matter not properly considered by the court