which Joseph Lynch seeks damages. In Renslow, a mother who had Rh negative blood was transfused in 1965 with Rh positive blood by defendant, resulting in 1974 in the premature birth and severe damage to her infant child because of the mother’s Rh isoimmunization. Defendant contended that at the time of the transfusion it owed no duty to the infant plaintiff, and that because the mother was transfused at the age of thirteen her subsequent pregnan ognizing causes of action for preconception tort by children of subsequent pregnancies who sustained injuries caused by erythroblastosis fetalis because of laboratory’s and physician’s failures during prior pregnancies to identify mother’s Rh negative blood and to prescribe Rhogam); Monusko v. Postle, 175 Mich.App. 269, 437 N.W.2d 367 (1989) (<HOLDING>); Lough v. Rolla Women’s Clinic, Inc., 866
recognizing cause of action for preconception tort based on allegation that obstetricians mismanagement of mothers prior pregnancy including failure to diagnose and test mothers rh isoimmunization was proximate cause of severe injuries to child of subsequent pregnancy holding evidence that mother allowed child to remain in home in which there was violent conduct as evidenced by fathers physical abuse of mother during her pregnancy was factually sufficient to support termination recognizing preconception tort cause of action for child born with rubella syndrome based on allegations that physicians who treated mother during earlier pregnancy failed to test or immunize mother for rubella holding that fundamental error occurred in the prosecution of a mother for aggravated manslaughter of her child when the prosecutor commented on the fact that the mother had contemplated having an abortion during the course of her pregnancy with the child holding evidence that mother allowed child to remain in home in which there was violent conduct as evidenced by fathers physical abuse of mother during her pregnancy was legally sufficient to support termination