time as the enforcement officer files a report under oath stating that such violator is not a prepaid or guaranteed account holder and does not have a valid agreement for the same with the authority for whom they are attempting to enforce this statute. The County Courts of both Seminole and Brevard are hereby ordered to dismiss any action currently pending where such an affidavit has not been filed. The written opinion was issued on April 22, 2008. DOT filed a motion for rehearing arguing that the circuit court’s appellate opinion incorrectly decided issues and ordered relief not raised at the trial court level or on appeal, and improperly relied upon the terms of a “license and use agreement” between Baird and the Orlando-Orange County Expressway Authority, e 579 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>). With respect to the law governing a circuit
recognizing that an injunction cannot bind parties who are not before this court recognizing that a court is without jurisdiction to issue an injunction which would interfere with the rights of those who are not parties to the action holding that a lower court should not take any action once appeal is filed which would interfere with the appeal process or with the appellate courts jurisdiction holding only that although a party cannot interfere with its own contract a supervisor who is not an officer of a plaintiffs employer is not a party to the plaintiffs employment contract and therefore can interfere with it holding that trial court erred by entering restraining order against former husbands current wife who was not a party or served with process as a court is without jurisdiction to issue an injunction which would interfere with the rights of those who are not parties to the action