and to third parties to allow attorneys to claim a lien on any judgment at any time, no matter how much time has passed since the case concluded. Here, LoBello perfected its lien eight months after the stipulated divorce decree was entered and the property was distributed—well after the time a lien could have attached to any of the property governed by that settlement. Moreover, the custody settlement did not modify the property distribution in the divorce decree or otherwise bring that property back into dispute. Most importantly, LoBello admits that all outstanding issues were resolved before it filed or tried to perfect the lien, and it did not show that any recovery was still pending resolution or other legal action. Cf. Fein v. Schwartz, 404 S.W.2d 210, 227 (Mo. Ct. App. 1966) (<HOLDING>). By the time LoBello filed and tried to
holding that notice was untimely where the attorney waited to establish the lien until approximately two months after the case concluded holding that where property remained to be transferred after the conclusion of a case the lien was timely perfected before the transfer of property even though notice was served after the conclusion of the case holding that property seized by a creditor prior to debtors bankruptcy was property of the estate even though creditor  the irs  held a secured interest  a tax lien  in the property holding that property is not abandoned by operation of law unless the debtor formally scheduled the property before the close of the case holding that the charge was timely when filed within the statute of limitations period even though served after the period