Id. (emphasis added). Like habeas corpus proceedings, except as specified by statute, actions for post-conviction relief are civil proceedings. Schelin v. Maass, 147 Or App 351, 355, 936 P2d 988, rev den 325 Or 446 (1997). Accordingly, the rights to counsel guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, are inapplicable in this proceeding. See McClure, 110 Or App at 125 (any right to counsel in a civil action arises, if at all, under state law by statute). Our decisions in Coffey and the cases on which it relies hinged on an implied “abridgement of the constitutional right to assistance of counsel” under the Sixth Amendment and Article I, section 11. Grcich, 148 Or App at 342. See also Heaps, 87 Or App at 493 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, their reasoning does not govern
holding that the right to a hearing on a request for substitute appointed counsel derives from the sixth amendment and article i section 11 holding that the defendant was deprived of his sixth amendment right to counsel where appointed counsels representation presented a conflict of interest holding that a criminal defendant has a sixth amendment right to counsel at trial recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel