such facts are alleged to appear, and other evidence thereof shall not be received.” § 2513(b). Any damage award to which plaintiff may be entitled is capped at “$50,000 for each 12-month period of incarceration.” § 2513(e). 3. Summary of the parties’ arguments Defendant seeks to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of jurisdiction because plaintiff-has not provided a true certificate of innocence from the trial court as required by § 2513(b). Defendant cites to cases from the United States Court of Claims, the predecessor court to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, for the proposition that presentation of a certificate of innocence is a jurisdictional requirement under § 2513. .See Moore v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 819, 820, 1982 WL 25193 (1982) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); McMurry v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 897,
holding that a governments consent to be sued must be construed strictly in favor of the sovereign holding pcra time limits are jurisdictional in nature and must be strictly construed holding that railroad immunity act should be strictly construed holding  2513 to be jurisdictional and therefore must be strictly construed holding that a statute enacted in derogation of the common law must be strictly construed  