when a trial court grants a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to W.R.C.P. 12(b)(6): According to our standard of review we will sustain a dismissal of a complaint only if it shows on its face that the plaintiff was not entitled to relief under any set of facts. Johnson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. of Hartford, Wyo., 608 P.2d 1299 (1980). In considering such a motion, the “facts alleged in the complaint are admitted and the allegations must be viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs.” Moxley v. Laramie Builders, Inc., Wyo., 600 P.2d 733, 734 (1979). Dismissal is a drastic remedy, and is sparingly granted. Harris v. Grizzle, Wyo., 599 P.2d 5 09, 20 L.Ed.2d 436, reh’g denied 393 U.S. 898, 89 S.Ct. 65, 21 L.Ed.2d 185 (1968) (<HOLDING>). The Act is primarily designed to accord all
holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute recognizing cause of action for wrongful death holding that a failure to include a beneficiary in a wrongful death action is a defect because the wrongful death act restricts plaintiffs to a single action holding both legitimate and illegitimate children to be proper claimants under georgia wrongful death statute holding unconstitutional a state wrongful death statute which denied illegitimate children the right to recover for the wrongful death of their mother