similarly reveals no distinction between lawsuits contesting general conditions of confinement and those premised on abuse or excessive force. See, e.g., 141 Cong.Rec. H1472-06 (1995) (statement of Rep. McCollum) (noting that PLRA “requires that all administrative remedies be exhausted before a prisoner can bring a civil action in Federal court”); id. (statement of Rep. Canady) (indicating that “bill will significantly curtail the ability of prisoners to bring frivolous and malicious lawsuits by forcing prisoners to exhaust all administrative remedies before bringing suit in Federal court”); 141 Cong.Rec. S14408-01 (1995) (statement of Sen. Dole) (noting “astronomical ]” growth in number of “due-process and cruel and unusual punishment complaints”); id. (statement of Sen. Hatch) (<HOLDING>). In fact, opponents of the PLRA apparently
recognizing that federal inmates filed 39000 lawsuits in 1994 excluding only habeas corpus petitions or other cases challenging the inmates conviction or sentence recognizing flood of frivolous lawsuits filed by prison inmates consuming valuable judicial resources holding that even in absence of copy of written decision inmates affidavit and notations on grievance form provided trial court with information necessary to determine whether inmates suit was filed within statutory time period holding that inmates have a property interest in their money holding that inmates must demonstrate an actual injury