(Ala.1985)). Taken in isolation, the term “personal relationship” does not necessarily carry with it any pejorative connotation. However, Nichols stated that she used that term after receiving information from Spain that led her to believe that Little and Jackson had a dating relationship. Davis placed that phrase “in greater context” in the February 19 story by referring to Little as being unmarried, thereby, at least arguably, implying the relationship was romantic in nature. The February 20 editorial furthered that notion by referring to the audit as “Little’s sweetheart” deal, because that term had no other obvious meaning considering no one had alleged Little had gained any pecuniary advantage from the audit. See Hale v. Kroger Ltd. P’ship I, 28 So.3d 772, 776 (Ala.Civ.App.2009) (<HOLDING>). When coupled with the statements that Little
holding that we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party holding that when reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence all evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government holding that in ruling on a summaryjudgment motion record evidence must be viewed in a light most favorable to nonmovant holding that appellate court reviewing trial courts habeas corpus ruling must review record evidence in light most favorable to ruling and uphold ruling absent abuse of discretion holding record is viewed in light most favorable to verdict