does not mean that Garcia is without remedy for the breach of his plea agreement. “It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” In the instant case, the prosecution promised Garcia an 81-month executed sentence, which did not include a conditional release term, in exchange for his plea of guilty to the charge of attempted first-degree criminal sexual conduct. This unqualified promise is unauthorized by law and therefore, Garcia must be allowed to withdraw from the plea agreement if he so chooses. If he does not so choose, Garcia should be permitted to continue to be bound by the original plea agreement, as amended to include the 10-year conditional release term required by law. We affi ) (<HOLDING>). 9 . 577 N.W.2d 481, 493 (Minn.1998). 10 . Id.
holding that defendants may agree to departure from sentencing guidelines in plea bargain holding that only factors specifically prohibited by the sentencing guidelines cannot form the basis for a downward departure holding that trial court acted within its authority in rejecting a plea bargain in a capital case holding that defendants diminished capacity while grounds for departure from the guidelines sentencing range is not grounds for departure below the minimum sentence set by congress holding that the government likely could not agree to a plea bargain which would directly circumvent a mandatory minimum