to confine [the plaintiff], (2) the plaintiff was conscious of the confinement, (3) the plaintiff did not consent to the confinement and (4) the confinement was not otherwise privileged.” See, e.g., Broughton v. State, 37 N.Y.2d 451, 456, 373 N.Y.S.2d 87, 335 N.E.2d 310, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 929, 96 S.Ct. 277, 46 L.Ed.2d 257 (1975). The common law tort of false arrest is recognized under § 1983 only if it also includes a violation of federal statutory or constitutional law. Cook v. Sheldon, 41 F.3d 73, 77 (2d Cir.1994), citing Easton v. Sundram, 947 F.2d 1011, 1016 (2d. Cir.1991). The Court believes that Plaintiffs allege that the officers violated their Fourth Amendment right to be free from “unreasonable ... seizures” by arresting them without probable cause. Cook, 41 F.3d at 77 (<HOLDING>); See also Posr v. Doherty, 944 F.2d 91, 97 (2d
holding that an arrest made outside an officers jurisdiction absent exigent circumstances violates the fourth amendment holding allegation that false affidavit was basis for arrest warrant is sufficient to state  1983 fourth amendment claim against affiant officer holding that false arrest supports a claim against state police under  1983 because it violates the fourth amendment holding that it was clearly established for  1983 purposes that an arrest founded upon a recalled warrant violates the fourth amendment holding that claims for false arrest and imprisonment under  1983 accrue at the time of the arrest