actions against him. Despite the evidence of statements related to Bennett’s military service — such as Avera’s statement to Bennett that “you’ve been gone a long time to both Iraq and Afghanistan and I’m not going to take any chances,” P. App. 13 — Bennett has failed to introduce evidence that would enable a reasonable jury to find that his military service was a motivating factor in DISD’s decisions regarding his reassignments, his termination, and the demand that he relinquish his police commission on being transferred to dispatcher. Although Bennett was injured and developed PTSD during his military service, Bennett points to no evidence that DISD’s decisions regarding his employment related to his protected status as a member of the military. See Sheehan, 240 F.3d at 1014-15 (<HOLDING>). IX Bennett asserts a claim for USERRA
holding that an indictment for capital murder must contain at least one aggravating factor holding that speech must be at least a substantial or motivating factor in the discharge quotations omitted holding there must at least be a distinct possibility that a viable fca action could be filed holding that in userra discrimination actions there must be an initial showing by the employee that military status was at least a motivating or substantial factor holding that even when there is a legitimate government purpose the discrimination must bear at least some rational relationship to that purpose