treatment at a hospital following an automobile accident. At the direction of one of the police officers, a physician withdrew a blood sample from the defendant. A chemical analysis of the sample indicated the defendant had been intoxicated. The defendant sought to exclude the chemical analysis on grounds that the blood sample was the product of an unconstitutional search and seizure. The Supreme Court disagreed holding that the withdrawal of the defendant’s blood was not unjustifiably intrusive as to render its seizure unreasonable. Id. at 771-72, 16 L. Ed. 2d at 920. However, the Court cautioned that its holding “in no way indicates that it permits more substantial intrusions, or intrusions under other conditions.” Id.) see also Winston v. Lee, 470 U.S. 753, 84 L. Ed. 2d 662 (1985) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, the Court put forth certain criteria
holding that gratuitous infliction of pain is unreasonable under the fourth amendment holding that police search of bolands trash constituted an unreasonable intrusion into his private affairs which was prohibited by washington constitution holding the fourth amendment prohibits the police from making a warrantless and nonconsensual entry into a suspects home in order to make a routine felony arrest holding that directing defendant to the secondary inspection area to answer additional questions is permissible under the fourth amendment holding that surgical intrusion into attempted robbery suspects left chest area to recover bullet fired by victim was unreasonable under the fourth amendment