of attorneys’ fees to Becky was an abuse of discretion because the evidence does not establish that she is unable to pay her fees. Under the provisions of the judgment that we affirm today, the chancellor ordered Gene to make cash payments to Becky totaling $27,925, as well as lump sum alimony payments totaling $58,500 over the next four-plus years. In contrast, the evidence showed that Gene had' little in the way of regular income, cash, or other liquid assets. Thus, Gene almost certainly would have to sell land .or cattle in order to pay Becky’s attorneys’ fees. Under these circumstances, we hold that Becky .is able to pay her attorneys’ fees, and therefore it was an abuse of discretion to order Gene to pay them for her. See Jones v. Jones, 917 So.2d 95, 104 (¶80) (Miss.Ct.App.2Q05) (<HOLDING>); see also Seymour v. Seymour, 960 So.2d 513,
recognizing that the pregnant womans ability to assert her own rights is beset with obstacles including her desire to protect her privacy holding that a defendants argument that her psr overstated the seriousness of her past conduct was not a sufficiently specific objection to the fact of her previous conviction holding that a wifes net worth of approximately 62000 demonstrated her ability to pay her own attorneys fees notwithstanding her objection that her assets were illiquid in the form of home equity and a state retirement account holding that relative to the threat that she posed physically separating tina cortez from her telephone taking her by the arm  escorting her from her home taking the keys to her home and locking the door and  placing her in the locked back seat of a patrol car was excessive force as well as an unlawful seizure under the fourth amendment holding that threatening employee to mind her own business investigating her videotaping her without her permission and forcing her to take polygraph could not be considered adverse employment actions because they had no effect on conditions of employment