Frazier of her Miranda rights. Frazier was under police supervision the entire time she was at the DCI office. Each time Frazier was interviewed, she was questioned by the same officer (Jones), at the same location (DCI office), and all but one interview was in the same room at the DCI office. The subject matter of each interview was the same, i.e., the death of Standing Bear. Frazier relies heavily upon the span of time between the. initial warning and her final statement. While Frazier was read her Miranda rights roughly six and a half hours before her final statement, she was reminded of those rights a mere hour before her final interview. Even without the reminder, the six and a half hour time span would not cause the initial warning to become stale. See Davis, 998 P.2d at 1138 (<HOLDING>); State v. Trostle, 191 Ariz. 4, 951 P.2d 869,
holding because an initial order contemplated the subsequent entry of a judgment the initial order was not considered a final adjudication recognizing that the court is not the appropriate forum for initial factfinding holding that a showing of cause and prejudice fails to overcome a defendants initial failure to object holding that a six and a half hour break between the initial warning and defendants confession did not cause the initial warning to become stale holding that a subsequent action was not barred because the initial court did not have jurisdiction over the claim