quotation marks omitted). The remedy that CNS seeks is more akin to the bright-line finding that we approved in Los Angeles County Bar Ass’n than the ongoing monitoring of the substance of state proceedings that we rejected in E.T. To determine whether the Ventura County Superior Court is making complaints available on the day they are filed, a federal court would not need to engage in the sort of intensive, context-specific legal inquiry that would be necessary to determine whether counsel’s performance was constitutionally adequate. See id. There is little risk that the federal courts would need to “examin[e] the administration of a substantial number of individual cases” to provide the requested relief. Id. at 1124; see also Tarter v. Hury, 646 F.2d 1010, 1013 (5th Cir. 1981) (<HOLDING>). The Ventura County Superior Court has
holding that an injunction is an extraordinary remedy holding that trial court erred by entering an injunction sua sponte as an injunction cannot be entered unless a pleading requests one holding federal injunction countermanding a state court injunction did not violate antiinjunction act holding that an injunction against excessive bail was barred by oshea but that an injunction requiring clerks to file and docket all pro se motions was a simple nondiscretionary procedural safeguard that would not be excessively intrusive holding that the injunction did not constitute a claim