prior to the granting of a discharge, the reaffirmation agreement satisfies the requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 524(c)(1). This is true even if the reaffirmation agreement is not memorial ized in a signed writing until after a discharge is granted. See In re Merritt, 366 B.R. 687 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.2007) (finding that a reaffirmation agreement is made “when all parties to the contract have objectively expressed their intention to make the bargain expressed by the contract,” and enforcing a reaffirmation agreement which was signed by the creditor post-discharge where the communications between the debtor and the creditor and the acts and circumstances surrounding those communications establish that a meeting of the minds occurred pre-discharge); In re LeBeau, 247 B.R. 537 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>). In this case, a “meeting of the minds”
holding that agreement had been reached where the plaintiff had proposed terms for providing his services to the defendant and the parties then entered into a business relationship  despite defendants claim it never agreed to the plaintiffs proposed salary terms for that relationship holding that a settlement agreement in which the parties failed to agree upon the terms of a release was unenforceable holding that reopening a closed case to file a reaffirmation agreement is not permitted by the bankruptcy code holding that a reaffirmation agreement is enforceable as having been made predischarge where the parties agree to the terms of the proposed reaffirmation predischarge but the debtors do not sign a writing embodying the terms of their agreement until after entry of the discharge order recognizing an agreement to agree is enforceable if its terms are reasonably definite and certain