"there is evidence to support a finding,” omitted findings would be "deemed as found by the court in such manner as to support the judgment.” When that rule was amended in 1988, there was no indication in the record of the rules proceedings that revised Rule 279 was to meant to change the prerequisite of "evidence,” which was maintained in Rule 299, to "factually sufficient” evidence with respect to deemed findings. But see Kilgarlin, Practicing Law in the “New Age”: The 1988 Amendments to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, 19 Tex. Tech. L.Rev. 881, 916 (1988). 70 . See Tex.RApp. P. 33.1; see also Tex.R. Civ. P. 279. 71 . We express no opinion with regard to the holdings on this issue in the courts of appeals. See In re M.S., 73 S.W.3d 537, 542 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2002, pet. granted) (<HOLDING>); In re G.C., 66 S.W.3d 517, 527 (Tex.App.-Fort
holding that a factual sufficiency complaint in a parental termination case may be reviewed even though it was not preserved in the trial court holding that issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal holding that a sufficiency challenge must be preserved in the trial court in a parental termination case to be reviewed on appeal holding the issue of recusal of the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review must be raised in the trial court