for different errors, see, e.g., State v. Hale, 2005 WI 7, ¶ 60, n.9, ¶¶ 79-85, 277 Wis. 2d 593, 691 N.W.2d 637 (Abrahamson, C.J., concurring); id., ¶¶ 85-90 (Wilcox, J. concurring); id., ¶¶ 100-18 (Butler, J., concurring); State v. Harvey, 2002 WI 93, ¶¶ 50-54, 254 Wis. 2d 442, 647 N.W.2d 189 (Crooks, J., concurring); id., ¶¶ 55-77 (Abrahamson, C.J., dissenting). 3 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 686 (1984) (quoting McMann v. Richardson, 397 U.S. 759, 771 n.14 (1970)). 4 Henderson v. Sargent, 926 F.2d 706, 711 (8th Cir. 1991). 5 Jenny Roberts, Too Little, Too Late: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel, The Duty to Investigate, and Pretrial Discovery in Criminal Cases, 31 Fordham Urb. L. J. 1097, 1110-11, 1114-15 (2004). 6 Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 689-91 (1984) (<HOLDING>). 7 State v. Thiel, 2003 WI 111, ¶ 45, 264 Wis.
holding that state courts factual finding that counsel made a strategic decision not to investigate further a mental illness that if reasonable would make counsels investigation not deficient was reasonable under aedpa review holding that after a reasonable investigation an insurer must promptly settle a claim for the value or within the range assigned to the claim as a result of its investigation holding that counsels strategic decisions should be afforded wide latitude holding that counsel may well have made a reasonable tactical choice to not object to arguably inadmissible testimony recognizing the wide latitude counsel must have in making tactical decisions and that strategic choices made after less than complete investigation may be reasonable if reasonable professional judgments support the limitations on investigation