completely akin to that of Chapman. Given the cireumstantial nature of the evidence relied upon for Watkins' convictions (see infra.), there remains the double jeopardy question of whether it is reasonably possible that the jury relied on Watkins' possession of the knife recovered from his apartment to support the essential elements of the Murder charge and the "armed with a deadly weapon" element that was included in Watkins' Class A Robbery charge, and remained a requisite element of his Class B conviction. Howeyver, given the forensic evidence presented at trial and the language of the trial court's final instructions, we hold that it was not reasonably possible that the same actual evidence, namely the recovered knife, was relied on to arrive at the Class B robbery elemen .1999) (<HOLDING>). The only question that remained was whether
holding more generally that a verdict may be sustained based on circumstantial evidence alone if that cireumstantial evidence supports a reasonable inference of guilt recognizing that circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to demonstrate a defendants guilt holding that the verdict must be sustained if there is any competent evidence to support the verdict holding that a jury verdict will be sustained on any reasonable theory based on the evidence holding that circumstantial evidence alone may establish discriminatory intent