another party’s self-help proposition, no matter how sincere their intentions. The facts of this case necessitate a particular type of proceeding, an abuse and neglect determination, before a guardian who is vested with custody of the children may be appointed. The trial court used language from the abuse and neglect statutes, essentially adjudicating the children abused and neglected. Yet, two children, who lived in the same conditions, remain with Mother. This adjudication should be done in juvenile court, pursuant to the abuse and neglect statutes, so that such an oversight may be avoided. One of the remedies under an abuse and neglect determination is the appointment of a guardian pursuant to SDCL 26-8A-22. There is simply no justification 18, 101 S.Ct. 2153, 68 L.Ed.2d 640 (1981) (<HOLDING>). These safeguards cannot be brushed aside by
recognizing that the due process guaranteed under the alabama constitution is coextensive with the due process guaranteed under the united states constitution recognizing that a parents liberty interest in the custody of a child is subject to due process protection holding parents custodial rights are a fundamental interest guaranteed due process protection holding that statements elicited during custodial interrogation of child are inadmissible unless parents are present holding parental rights are constitutionally protected fundamental interest