its expenses on a prior submission is not normally penalized for its experience when proposing on a later RFP. Despite the court’s finding that HHS acted arbitrarily and capriciously during the solicitation and award proceedings and the award to CNAC of bid preparation and proposal costs in CNAC I, the government chose not to contest the computation or extensive substantiation offered by CNAC for the proposed bid preparation and proposal costs plaintiff claimed. Rather, defendant has chosen to move to strike the entire application. In fact, CNAC submitted hundreds of pages documenting and outlining its bid preparation and proposal costs. This documentation may be sufficient to establish a quantum damage award. See, e.g., Beta Analytics Int'l Inc. v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. at 164 (<HOLDING>). The costs must be reasonable and allocable to
holding that when determining the proper amount for a burdened property that was purchased in a package only two methods suggest themselves as arguably appropriate 1 a determination of the fair market value of the  property burdened by the right of first refusal or 2 a determination of the portion of the  purchase price which based on the percentage of the fair market value of the entire package represented by the  property burdened by the right of first refusal should be allocated to the  property burdened by the right of first refusal holding that the cia complied with the requirements of eo 12958 where a declaration regarding a foia request stated that the declarant had rereviewed each of the documents described in the cias vaughn index during the current litigation process and determined that the relevant documents each contain information  warranting their continued classification despite their age holding that documents describing the work performed by each employee identifying the number of hours worked and outlining the burdened hourly rates of each employee are the types of information used to quantify the bid proposal and submission costs holding that an employer is accountable to a discharged employee for unpaid compensation if the employee was terminated in bad faith and the compensation is clearly connected to work already performed holding that each state has strong interest in applying its own statutes of limitations and describing the policy choices embodied in each states statute