must file a statement that the defendant understands the admonitions and is aware of the consequences of his plea. Tex.Code Ceim.ProcANN. art. 26.13(d). Substantial compliance by the court with the admonishment statute is sufficient. Tex.Code Crim. ProoANN. art. 26.13(c) (Vernon 1989). When the record shows that the defendant received an admonishment on punishment, there is prima facie showing that the plea was know- mg and voluntary. Ex parte Williams, 704 S.W.2d at 775. There is no requirement that the trial court orally inquire about specific issues of voluntariness after the defendant and his counsel have both admitted on the record, without objection by the defendant, that the defendant filed such written documents and that he understood them. See Rodriguez, 850 S.W.2d at 607 (<HOLDING>). In the aggravated robbery cause, the
holding that where a criminal defendant has voluntarily and knowingly entered into a plea agreement in which he or she waives the right to appeal the defendant is not entitled to resentencing in light of booker  holding that the defendants guilty plea was entered into knowingly voluntarily and intelligently holding that at resentencing the district court was entitled to assume that the waiver was still in effect and was not required to again advise defendant of his right to counsel where defendant had waived counsel at the plea stage holding that the trial court was entitled to rely upon contents of written admonishments and statements in which both defendant and his counsel averred that defendants plea was freely and voluntarily made holding employer was entitled to rely and act upon the written advice from the employees physician