Texas, under Clerk’s No. 879845. Said map has been duly authenticated with proper certificates showing dedication of the streets, drives and easements to the use of the present and future residents and to the public, subject to the restrictions and covenants herein contained, to the same extent as though copied at length in said dedication certificate and said map is subject to only .App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. denied) (reversing and remanding for determination of attorney's fees under the Declaratory Judgments Act after rejecting contentions that the declaratory judgment action was duplicative of plaintiffs’ tort claims and brought solely as a vehicle to recover attorney's fees); Guniganti v. Kalvakuntla, 346 S.W.3d 242, 251-53 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); see also CareFlite v. Rural Hill Emergency
holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to deny an award of attorneys fees to the wife holding trial court did not abuse its discretion when it awarded attorneys fees because the declaratory relief action addressed validity of note and was not used as a mere ploy to recover attorneys fees holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees holding that the court of appeals erred in modifying the judgment to include attorneys fees when the trial courts refusal to grant attorneys fees was not the subject of a point of error