notice” and vacates order confirming plan). Similarly, in the case before me, Debt- or’s conversion notice ended the chapter 13 case, effectively vacating the order confirming the chapter 13 plan and depriving it of any res judicata effect. Therefore, by electing to convert his case, Debtor was no longer obligated under the terms of the plan. 3. The funds in the plan “vested” in the creditors upon transfer to the trustee. Some courts have held that upon receipt by the trustee, plan payments are “vested in” creditors holding allowed claims and cannot thereafter be divested. See e.g. In re Pegues, 266 B.R. 328 (Bankr.D.Md.2001) (finding once chapter 13 debtor makes payment under confirmed plan, he relinquishes all rights to that payment); In re Hardin, 200 B.R. 312 (Bankr.E.D.Ky.1996) (<HOLDING>); In re Galloway, 134 B.R. 602
holding that confirmation vests rights in creditors under  1306 and other equitable factors holding that the clear language of section 1306 establishes that confirmation of a chapter 13 plan is not relevant to determining whether property is or is not property of the estate holding that the creditors right to equitable relief constituted a dischargeable claim holding that confirmation vests in the debtor property of the estate not dedicated to the plan holding that a creditors rights in a given case will be totally extinguished upon payment of the sums called for in the order of confirmation