which states that a crime of violence is “any offense ... that ... is burglary of a dwelling, arson, extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” The language in the residual (“otherwise”) clause, targeting conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another, is congruent with Alaska’s prohibition of “plac[ing] another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury by means of a dangerous instrument.” Regardless of a defendant’s mental state, conduct involving a dangerous instrument “create[s] significant risks of bodily injury or confrontation that might result in bodily injury.” James v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1592, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Rendon-Duarte directs our attention to this
holding that failure to stop for a blue light is a violent felony under armed career criminal statute because it involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which involves a serious potential risk of injury under 18 usc  924 holding that attempted burglary under florida law qualified as a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act 18 usc  924e2biihereinafter acca because it involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another holding that a conviction for florida armed robbery is a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act holding that  459 is categorically a crime of violence under guidelines  4b12a2 because the usual or ordinary firstdegree burglary in california involves conduct that presents a serious risk of physical violence and injury to others