the insurance policy. Specifically, Farmers alleged Perrotta never signed and retened the transcription of his EUO as required by the policy. The policy contains a “Conditions” section enumerating the insured’s “Duties After Loss.” One of these enumerated duties is that the insured must “submit to [EUO] and sign and swear to it” in case of a loss to covered property. Additionally, the policy has an “Agreement” provision, which explicitly provides that Farmers “will provide the insurance described in this policy in return for the premium and compliance with all applicable provisions of this policy.” Insurance policy provisions requiring the insured to submit to an EUO are valid. See Philadelphia Underwriters’ Agency of Fire Ins. Ass’n v. Driggers, 111 Tex. 392, 238 S.W. 633, 635 (1922) (<HOLDING>); State Farm, General Ins. Co. v. Lawlis, 773
holding that a refusal to sign an implied consent form is not a refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test for purposes of section 1547 holding that failure or refusal to submit to euo after loss suspends insureds right of recovery holding that the defendants due process rights were violated by refusal to allow him to contact counsel after he was given misleading information on consequences of refusal to take bloodalcohol test holding right of first refusal only applied to a voluntary sale and taking of property by condemnation is involuntary therefore right of first refusal not triggered holding that refusal to submit to breathalyzer test did not result from custodial interrogation