Place, 462 U.S. 696, 709, 103 S.Ct. 2637, 2645, 77 L.Ed.2d 110 (1983); see Cobb, 690 P.2d at 852 (officer may run a computer check for outstanding warrants during an investigatory stop provided that this procedure does not unreasonably extend the detention); see generally 4 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seizure § 9.2(f), at 58-65 (3d ed. 1996). Second, whether the officer diligently pursued the investigation during the detention. See United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 1575, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985) (“[W]e consider it appropriate to examine whether the police diligently pursued a means of investigation that was likely to confirm or dispel their suspicions quickly, during which time it was necessary to detain the defendant.”); Place, 462 U.S. at 709, 103 S.Ct. at 2645 (<HOLDING>). Third, whether the suspect was required to
holding that a detention was not unreasonable where officers though slowed down were diligent in their investigation holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention holding that police may briefly detain individuals for further investigation during a traffic stop as long as they can establish the reasonableness of the detention holding that the forceable stop at issue was an investigatory stop rather than an arrest holding that an officers diligent pursuit of an investigation during the detention is a factor in determining the reasonableness of an investigatory stop