requirement that a defendant be advised of such collateral consequences in order for his guilty plea to be valid. Thus, Hall’s counsel was not required to inform Hall that he could face a sentence without parole if he rejected the initial plea offer. Accordingly, the trial court did not err in finding that Hall failed to show that his plea counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Judgment affirmed. Mikell, P. J., and Boggs, J., concur. C. Paul Bowden, District Attorney, Kevin E. Hutto, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. 1 The truck was registered to Hall, who was subsequently arrested. 2 See OCGA § 16-7-1 (a). 3 Rice v. State, 277 Ga. 649, 649 (594 SE2d 335) (2004). 4 See OCGA § 15-6-3 (39) (A). 5 See Williams v. State, 301 Ga. App. 849, 851 (1) (689 SE2d 124) (2010) (<HOLDING>); Maples v. State, 293 Ga. App. 232, 233 (1)
holding the trial court abused its discretion in denying the defendants motion to withdraw his guilty plea because the defendant did not admit to facts demonstrating the required mental state holding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendants motion to withdraw guilty plea filed beyond term of court in which defendant was sentenced holding that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea was not pending because nothing was left for the court to decide holding that a defendant may withdraw a guilty plea as a matter of right before it is accepted by the court based on ndr crim p 32d3 which states that a defendant may not withdraw his plea of guilty as a matter of right once the plea has been accepted by the court  alteration in original holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty plea filed three weeks after entering the plea