clauses in the trusts does not preclude this result. We find the following comment from the Restatement (Third) of Trusts § 58 cmt. g (2003) instructive: The executor or administrator of a deceased beneficiary of a spendthrift trust is entitled to income or other distributions that have accrued but have not been paid at the time of the beneficiary’s death to the same extent as if the trust were not a spendthrift trust.... Because income or principal received by the personal representative is distributed and no longer subject to the trust, these funds are subject to creditors’ claims and other obligations of the deceased beneficiary’s estate, and to disposition by the beneficiary’s will or by intestate succession. See also In re Campbell’s Estate, 48 Haw. 1, 394 P.2d 784, 789 (1964) (<HOLDING>). Point II is denied. Point III In Trustees’
holding the assets of a discretionary support trust could be considered when determining a mentally handicapped beneficiarys eligibility for living expenses holding that a spendthrift clause in a trust did not preclude accrued income from being paid to a beneficiarys personal representatives holding that a public trust that exercised control over the beneficiarys employment did not change the benefit plan into a government plan because the trust did not establish the plan or control it holding that a trust beneficiarys state law claims concerning investment of trust assets in affiliated mutual funds satisfied the in connection with a purchase or sale of security requirement of slusa holding that attempted conveyance of remainder interest in a trust was invalid because the spendthrift provision prohibited beneficiary from making any binding commitment of principal or income during the life of the trust