of pro hac vice status, they too must be undone. The findings of Rule 11 violations are set aside, the sanction and admonition are vacated, and the pro hac vice status of Scheck and Brustin is restored. No costs. It is so ordered. 1 . A further version, correcting typographical errors, was filed later that day. The differ-enees between the two versions are not material to these appeals. 2 . This provision requires that in every pleading, or motion or other filing counsel’s signature is a representation that "the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentia-ry support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery.” 3 . Compare In re Williams, 156 F.3d 86, 92 (1st Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>), with Precision Specialty Metals, Inc. v.
holding that a jurists derogatory comments about a lawyers conduct without more do not constitute an appealable sanction holding that an isolated derogatory remark did not create an inference of discrimination holding that a postjudgment contempt sanction for refusal to obey orders whether it is characterized as a civil or a criminal sanction is immediately appealable as a final order under  1291 holding that the court had no power to sanction conduct that occurred in an arbitration holding that because a discovery sanction should be no more severe than necessary to satisfy its legitimate purposes the trial court must determine that lesser sanctions constitute an insufficient remedy