of training caused her injury, or that the City’s alleged failure amounted to deliberate indifference. See Chiaro v. Cnty. of Nassau, No. 09-CV-3702 (SJF)(AKT), 2011 WL 3701804, at *6 (E.D.N.Y. July 29, 2011) (report and recommendation) (granting summary judgment where plaintiff failed to identify a deficiency in training or proffer evidence that inadequate training was the actual cause of his injury), adopted, 2011 WL 3702110 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 23, 2011), aff'd, 488 Fed.Appx. 518 (2d Cir.2012) (summary order). Plaintiffs conclusory allegations cannot even survive a motion to dismiss, let alone summary judgment. See King, 2014 WL 4954621, at *34 (dismissing Monell claim because “ ‘the simple recitation that there was a failure to train municipal employees does not suf , 669 (D.Conn.2008) (<HOLDING>). The other allegations in the records — an
holding that municipality could not be liable on failuretosupervise theory where police officer had history of insubordination at prior policing job due to absence of any evidence showing that the officer was incompetently performing his job on such a consistent basis that keeping him on duty represented a deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of its citizens holding that persecution of a woman because of her government job or her husbands position as a police officer was not on account of a particular social group recognizing affirmative duty of a police officer to prevent the violation of constitutional rights by another officer holding that a company policy which forced an employee to choose between losing his job for the exercise of his rights under erisaprotected benefits or keeping his job and forcing him to give up his benefits would be essentially unfair or a quintessential hobsons choice  holding officer liable for deprivation of constitutional rights despite argument that officer although present was not in control of the situation