932 (7th Cir.1993) (“[A] bankruptcy court can enjoin proceedings in other courts when it is satisfied that such proceedings would defeat or impair its jurisdiction over a case before it.”); Harris N.A. v. Gander Partners, LLC, 442 B.R. at 887 (same); In re AS Management Services, Inc., 2007 Bankr.LEXIS 2477, 2007 WL 2100514, at *14 (Bankr. S.D.Fla. July 12, 2007) ("As Collier observes, [t]he basis purpose of the section [§ 105] is to enable the [bankruptcy] court to do whatever is necessary to aid its jurisdiction, i.e. anything arising in or relating to a bankruptcy case.”); In re Chateaugay Corp., 109 B.R. at 621 ("Section 105 permits the issuan 3d 368, 382 (3d Cir.2002); Quigley Co., Inc. v. Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos (In re Quigley Co., Inc.), 676 F.3d 45, 53 (2d Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>)). As explained, the Guarantor Arbitration will
holding that thirdparty nondebtor claims must directly affect the res of the bankruptcy estate holding that if dispute involves funds that are not property of estate it cannot be maintained in the bankruptcy court unless it is related to the bankruptcy proceeding which means it is likely to affect the debtors estate holding that a claimed expense must directly and substantially benefit the bankruptcy estate holding that bankruptcy court could not enjoin third party tort claims that would not affect estate holding that a bankruptcy court does not have exclusive jurisdiction over third party claims against nondebtor parties as such claims are not cases under title 11