The Steins contend that those remedies are not good enough to “obligate” Paradigm to construct the condominium in two years, as required by § 1702(a)(2) of the Disclosure Act. They argue that without the remedies of special, consequential, punitive, speculative, and indirect damages, which they expressly waived in the contract, they cannot inflict enough legal pain on Paradigm to force it to carry out its contractual duty to finish within two years. Specific performance or injunctive relief, if vigorously pursued, ordinarily will be enough to force a seller to fulfill its contractual obligations within the time a contract requires. Florida law provides that a party may sue for specific performance and obtain an injunction that “shall specify the time within which the ac 3d DCA 1979) (<HOLDING>). A court order requiring a party to perform as
holding that a party does not automatically qualify as a real party in interest merely because it has been named as a defendant in a declaratory judgment action holding that a party may be held in contempt for refusing to comply with a specific performance judgment requiring the party to sell a piece of real estate holding that a party may not contract away the protection that a statute is intended to afford him nor may the other party to the contract exempt itself from its duty to comply with such statute holding prospectively that a vendees interest in a real estate contract constitutes real estate within the meaning of the judgment lien statute holding that trustee may bring assigned creditor claims where estate is the real party in interest