Inc. v. Douglas, 194 Neb. 715, 235 N.W.2d 398 (1975) (poker and bridge are games of chance). Thus, the question becomes whether the player bets something of value on the outcome. Something of value shall mean any money or property, any token, object, or article exchangeable for money or property, or any form of credit or promise directly or indirectly contemplating transfer of money or property or of any interest therein, or involving extension of a service or entertainment. § 28-1101(6). The 25 cents used to activate the machines is clearly something of value. The free replay credits awarded by the machines are a credit or promise involving extension of a service or entertainment and are therefore something of value. See, also, Baedaro v. Caldwell, 156 Neb. 489, 56 N.W.2d 706 (1953) (<HOLDING>); Score Family Fun Center v. San Diego Cty.,
holding that where indictment and plea agreement specified value of packages taken entry of guilty plea conclusively established value for purposes of sentencing holding such statutes are not analogous statutes of limitation for erisa purposes holding determination of property value in case to decide if assessed value was excessive is not a liquidated demand where only evidence of property value was the conclusory allegation of value in plaintiffs unsworn petition holding that free games on pinball machines are things of value for purposes of gambling statutes holding that statutes of limitations are considered substantive matters for purposes of the erie doctrine