in markets that were much more heavily populated. Given that the event and attendance range in the 2005 Report was based on objectively verifiable demographic data, a fact-finder could conclude with reasonable certainty that the Event Center would be unable to generate much more than about 105 events and 320,000 attendees in a given year. See Convergent, 948 F.2d at 516 (emphasis added). This is especially the case given the data from the more conservative 2001 Feasibility Study. Nonetheless, despite the fact that several of the Defendants specifically commissioned these studies, or were intimately aware of their contents, the Official Statements, perhaps unreasonably, projected a substantially higher annual number of events (133) and attendees (480,000). See Kaplan, 49 F.3d at 1375 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, as with the executive in
recognizing that a state courts determination is not an unreasonable application of law merely because it is erroneous holding that it is not holding that 20minute detention was not unreasonable where suspect gave misleading answers holding that the knowledge requisite to knowing violation of a statute is factual knowledge as distinguished from knowledge of the law holding that a future projection is misleading when a speaker makes that projection with knowledge that it is unreasonable