Constitution does not apply to local courts and no provision of Virgin Islands law includes a case-or-controversy requirement.” Hodge, 62 V.I. at 687 n.8 (citing Malloy v. Reyes, 61 V.I. 163, 171 n.4 (V.I. 2014)); see also Bryan v. Fawkes, 61 V.I. 201, 222 (V.I. 2014); In re Q.G., 60 V.I. 654, 659 n.5 (V.I. 2014); Tip Top Constr. Corp. v. Gov’t of the V.I., 60 V.I. 724, 730 n.2 (V.I. 2014); V.I. Narcotics Strike Force v. Pub. Emps. Relations Bd., 60 V.I. 204, 213 (V.I. 2013). However, Hamed cites none of this controlling authority in making his standing argument, despite being required to do so under this Court’s rules. V.I.S.Ct.R. 15(b) (“[I]n accordance with ethical standards, any attorney who ... does not present otherwise controlling contrary law, will be subject to such sancti ) (<HOLDING>); Haynes v. Ottley, 61 V.I. 547, 556 n.4 (V.I.
holding that persons not parties to a contract did not have standing to seek declaratory judgment on contracts validity holding that because punitive damages are nonpecuniary a plaintiff has standing to seek them under the general maritime law only if having standing to seek other nonpecuniary losses holding that standing existed holding that party standing in loco parentis has standing to seek custody of child holding that a writein candidate had standing to seek a recount under the election statutes