dangerous to maintain the condition, at least absent reasonable warnings or other remedial measures being taken. [Emphasis added.] Plaintiff contends that the driveway presented an unreasonable risk of harm because it was steep and covered in snow and ice. Plaintiff also notes that eaves directed water onto the driveway. Although the slippery conditions coupled with the nature of the sloped driveway presented unsafe conditions, our Supreme Court has set an extraordinarily high bar for a condition to constitute an unreasonable risk of harm because the condition must present a “substantial risk of death or severe injury.” Id. Based on this heightened standard, courts have repeatedly held that ice and snow generally do not meet this threshold. See, e.g., Perkoviq, 466 Mich at 19-20 (<HOLDING>); Corey v Davenport College of Business (On
holding that the mere presence of ice snow or frost on a sloped rooftop generally does not create an unreasonably dangerous condition holding that mere disagreement over the proper treatment does not create a constitutional claim holding the intentional use of a dangerous instrumentality does not support the allegation of mere criminal negligence holding that an improper traffic control device may create a dangerous condition for which the governments immunity from liability is waived holding that mere possession of a dangerous weapon is insufficient to support a charge of robbery with a dangerous weapon