(“Incentive awards are fairly typical in class action cases. Such awards are discretionary and are intended to compensate class representatives for work done on behalf of the class .... ” (citations omitted)). The district court did not abuse its discretion by including a restriction on the assignment of class members’ rights or by retaining jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Alvarado v. Table Mountain Rancheria, 509 F.3d 1008, 1017 (9th Cir.2007) (“[A] federal court has jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement in a dismissed case when the dismissal order incorporates the settlement terms, or the court has retained jurisdiction over the settlement contract.”); Portland Elec. & Plumbing Co. v. City of Vancouver, 29 Wash.App. 292, 627 P.2d 1350, 1351 (1981) (<HOLDING>). We reject as moot Nigaglioni’s objection to
recognizing that reasonable time limitations may be placed on the exercise of constitutional rights recognizing that assignability of rights may be prohibited by contract recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract holding that employees may not contract away their flsa rights recognizing that defendant may waive miranda rights