of the watercolors are attached as exhibits. See Appendix. 2 . In 1983 and 1984, Price published German and English language editions of a catalog of Hitler's paintings and sketches. The catalog depicts the paintings that are the subject of this case. See Billy F. Price, Adolf Hitler: The Unknown Artist (English ed. 1984). 3 . "Price” refers also to the heirs of Hoffman, who joined the suit as plaintiffs. The district court dismissed their claims as moot in the light of its decision. 4 . The fact that Germany was occupied, or indeed whether the German law was applicable, has no bearing on the effect of § 2680(b). The Supreme Court has defined the term “country” as "a region or tract of land." See Smith v. United States, 507 U.S. 197, -, 113 S.Ct. 1178, 1181-83, 122 L.Ed.2d 548 (1993) (<HOLDING>). 5 . The central collecting point in Munich
holding that designation is neither a sentence nor a punishment holding that there can be no plain error where neither we nor the supreme court has addressed an issue holding that subject matter jurisdiction relates to whether a plaintiffs claim falls within a class of claims which a court is empowered to hear holding if a plaintiffs claim is concerned with rights created within the contractual relationship it falls within the tucker act holding that a claim arising in antarctica which has neither an organized government nor a regime of laws falls within  2680k