by reference, and adopted them as the facts supporting the agency’s action. The Office of Financial Regulation ordered Trisha’s One Stop to pay a $15,000 fine and revoked its license. The cases are clear that “[w]hen a party waives the right to challenge the factual allegations of an administrative complaint, ... the facts of the complaint are deemed to be admitted.” Nicks v. Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l Regulation, 957 So.2d 65, 67 n. 1 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007). Because Trisha’s One Stop failed to file a petition for a hearing in response to the administrative complaint within the time allowed, the facts alleged in the complaint were deemed the facts of the case. See Fla. Admin. Code R. 28-106.111(2) & (4); Wojnowski v. State, Office of Fin. Regulation, 98 So.3d 189, 191 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (<HOLDING>); Diaz v. State, Dep’t of Bus. & Prof’l
holding that appellant by failing to object to commissioners authority before or at the administrative hearing waived any challenge holding that any person who receives written notice of an agency decision that does or may determine substantial interests and who fails to file a written request for a hearing within 21 days waives the right to request a hearing quoting florida administrative code rule 281061114 holding that defendants waived any challenge to the trial courts failure to hold an evidentiary hearing holding that when wojnowski failed to timely seek an administrative hearing to challenge the facts supporting ofrs intended action he waived any further opportunity to do so citing florida administrative code rule 281061114 recognizing that administrative agencies routinely apply equitable estoppel in administrative hearings and that permitting them to do so is consistent with administrative remedy exhaustion requirements and separation of powers