hindsight, uncorrectable events or decisions made by Officer Greff, but rather to evaluate the reasonableness of the immediate decision to enter the intersection, against the traffic light, without bringing his vehicle to a complete stop. As Judge Harrell stated in McGriff, the Court of Appeals “has considered police procedures and guidelines in determining whether police activity was reasonable under given circumstances.” McGriff, 361 Md. at 504, 762 A.2d 48 (Harrell, J., dissenting). See Williams v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 359 Md. 101, 753 A.2d 41 (2000)(Determining, in a simple negligence action, whether the police officer violated Article 27, Section 798 and Baltimore City Police Department General Order 10-93); State v. Albrecht, 336 Md. 475, 502-05, 649 A.2d 336 (1994)(<HOLDING>); see also Boyer v. State, 323 Md. 558, 590-91,
holding officers 60 hours of training at two different police departments that he had read a book on the subject and that the methods used in interpretation of bloodstains were of the type relied upon by experts in the field was sufficient holding the evidence supported the police officers failure to follow the directives in the montgomery county police departments field operations manual holding in virginia county police officers  1983 action against ms department and various county officials that the departments violation of the law enforcement officers procedural guarantees does not necessarily compel a finding of a due process violation holding that fire departments are analogous to police departments in this respect holding a county police civil service board violated officers due process rights by failing to follow its own procedures in their termination proceedings