872, 880 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.1997). 51 . Id. 52 . Id. See also Chase Manhattan Bank. N.A. v. Ford (In re Ford), 186 B.R. 312, 317 n. 6 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1995). 53 . See, e.g., First Nat’l Bank of Mobile v. Roddenberry (In re Roddenberry), 701 F.2d 927, 932-33 (11th Cir.1983). 54 . Chevy Chase Bank, FSB (In re Briese), 196 B.R. 440, 450 (Bankr.W.D.Wis.1996) 55 . Citibank South Dakota N.A. v. Dougherty (In re Dougherty), 84 B.R. 653, 657 (9th Cir. BAP 1988). See. also In re Van Horne, 823 F.2d 1285, 1287 (8th Cir.1987). 56 . Dougherty, at 657; Sears, Roebuck, and Co. v. Faulk (In re Faulk), 69 B.R. 743, 757 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1986); Chase Manhattan Bank v. Carpenter (In re Carpenter), 53 B.R. 724, 730 (Bankr.N.D.Ga.1985). 57 . Field v. Mans, - U.S. -, -, 116 S.Ct. 437, 444, 133 L.Ed.2d 351 (1995) (<HOLDING>). 58 . Deb. Ex. I. 59 . Id. 60 . Id. 61 . Pi.
holding clear and convincing standard to prove fraud or fraudulent intent and preponderance of the evidence to prove other elements under  727 holding that a creditor objecting to the dischargeability of a debt under  523a must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence holding that the creditor must prove the elements of actual fraud holding that creditor did not have actual knowledge of the bankruptcy filing where the debtor informed creditor of the possibility that a bankruptcy case would be filed holding that the government need not prove actual notice to the prisoner