subd. 4(b)(2), to bring his August 13, 2012, petition beyond the limitations period. This argument is waived, however, because Greer failed to address this exception in his arguments before us. See Melina v. Chaplin, 327 N.W.2d 19, 20 (Minn.1982) (stating that issues not briefed on appeal “must be deemed waived”). 4 . Greer argues for the first time that the doctrine of equitable tolling applies with respect to both of the petitions before us. Therefore, Greer urges, the petitions should be considered on their merits even if they are otherwise time-barred. Because Greer did not make an equitable tolling argument before the postcon-viction court, the issue is not properly before us and we decline to address this argument on the merits. Brocks v. State, 753 N.W.2d 672, 676 (Minn.2008) (<HOLDING>); Powers v. State, 731 N.W.2d 499, 502
holding an issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that issue not raised before the postconviction court was forfeited for the purposes of appeal