the process by which leachate is generated and moves through an unlined landfill, such as the Kramer Landfill, demonstrates that the reasoning advanced by the court in Keene Corporation is applicable to the factual context in this appeal. Although the initial exposure to the contaminants caused by the Borough’s depositing of municipal waste was not “an immediate and discrete injury, the fact that it is part of an injurious process is enough for it to constitute ‘injury’ under the policies.” Keene Corp., supra, 667 F.2d at 1046 (“The injury and attendant liability became predictable precisely because it was discovered that past occurrences were likely to have set in motion injurious processes for which Keene could be held liable.”). See also Chemical Leaman, supra, 89 F.3d at 995-96 (<HOLDING>); New Castle County, supra, 725 F.Supp. at 812
holding that the continuous injury trigger of coverage should be applied to third party claims of continuous or progressively deteriorating bodily injury or property damage holding that an accident under a liability insurance policy occurs when the resulting damage was an event that takes place without the insureds foresight or expectation  holding that insureds initial discharge of contaminated rinsewater began continuous indivisible process resulting in damage holding that a similar exclusion denies coverage for property damage to the particular part of the real property that is the subject of the insureds work at the time of the damage if the damage arises out of those operations holding that under maine law the occurrence provision focuses on the property damage after the initial discharge and whether it was expected or intended from the insureds point of view