Act (VUFA), section 6105, and for the duration of [Appellant’s] probation and/or parole period, [Appellant] is subject to random searches of his/her residence. The search will be limited to the space occupied by [Appellant]. The searches will be conducted by the agents of the Gun Violence Task Force. Sentencing Order 3/18/08. ¶ 6 First, we note that the trial court did not sentence Appellant to probation; thus, there can be no probation conditions. Secondly, because the court sentenced Appellant to a maximum term of incarceration of two or more years, Appellant’s parole would be under the exclusive supervision of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (“PBPP”) and not the Court of Common Pleas. 61 P.S. § 331.17, and see Commonwealth v. Camps, 772 A.2d 70, 74 (Pa.Super.2001) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, any condition the sentencing court
holding that parole is not a right in pennsylvania holding that there was no legal right to court review of parole board decision because there is no legal right to release on parole recognizing that it is well established that where a state provides a discretionary parole regime prisoners do not have a liberty or property interest in parole holding that it is well settled that the pennsylvania board of probation and parole has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years holding that a defendant at federal sentencing who is on state parole where no parole revocation has occurred is not subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment thus ussg  5g13 is inapplicable