would have her baby in prison. And if she did have the baby in prison, she would not be able to keep the child with her indefinitely. Nor would she be able to see her other child often, and she might even lose custody of both if she were imprisoned for a sufficiently long time. Sergeant McNicholas’s estimate of fifteen years of incarcera n the absence of excessive force, allegations that a police officer uses ethnic slurs against arrestees suffice to state an IIED claim. See Kelly v. City of Minneapolis, 598 N.W.2d 657, 660-61, 663 (Minn.1999) (upholding jury verdict on IIED claim in favor of arrestees where officers used justifiable force but also used racial epithet and disparaging names). But see Watkins v. City of Southfield, 221 F.3d 883, 890 (6th Cir.2000) (applying Michigan law) (<HOLDING>). An examination of the principles underlying
holding that arrest made with probable cause and without excessive force does not give rise to iied claim holding that because plaintiffs iied claim is based on the facts that support plaintiffs malicious prosecution claim plaintiffs iied claim did not accrue until the charges against them were dismissed holding that plaintiff stated iied claim where officers yelled racial slurs at attacked and filed false charges against him holding that plaintiff stated iied claim where officer allegedly hurled racial epithets at him and struck him without provocation holding that motorists allegation that racial epithet was used against him coupled with officers justifiable use of force did not state iied claim