of action for vicarious liability against Gerelco. We note, however, that the Legislature in 2003 expressly provided that the immunities in the statute extended to "vicarious liability.” Ch. 2003-412, § 14, Laws of Fla. (amending § 440.11(1)). Also, cases suggesting that such vicarious liability is available were either decided under the statute before it was amended in 2003, Wright v. Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co., 823 So.2d 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), or involve the unique context of sovereign immunity where, by statute, a cause of action in negligence against a government employee is barred because an alternative remedy against the employing government is expressly authorized. See § 768.28(9)(a), Fla. Stat. (2014); see also Aravena v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 928 So.2d 1163, 1168 (Fla.2006) (<HOLDING>); Holmes Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Duffell, 651 So.2d
holding that the legislature has in clear and unambiguous language waived sovereign immunity against elected public officials and governmental entities defined by the act to be employers holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added holding that sovereign immunity barred claim for compensatory sanctions against the government holding that as a general rule interlocutory trial court orders rejecting defenses of common law sovereign immunity governmental immunity public official immunity statutory immunity or any other type of immunity are not appealable under the maryland collateral order doctrine holding under the sovereign immunity statute any negligence claim arising under the unrelated works exception against a public coemployee must be brought against the governmental entity employer