“battle of the forms.” Id. at 794. In the present case, McGill’s price quotation provided that its offer was subject to immediate acceptance by Frigidaire. It was sufficiently detailed and indicated that acceptance was all that was needed to ripen the offer into a contract. The open terms that prevented the price quotation from being a valid offer in Litton, 15 F.3d at 795, are not present in this case. Because McGill manifested a “clear, definite and explicit” offer of sale, the price quotation qualifies as a valid offer. See id. (citing A. Belanger & Sons, Inc. v. United States ex rel. National United States Radiator Corp., 275 F.2d 372 (1st Cir.1960)); Lejkowitz, 86 N.W.2d at 691; cf. Brown Machine, Division of John Brown, Inc. v. Hercules, Inc., 170 S.W.2d 416, 419 (Mo.Ct.App.1989) (<HOLDING>). Frigidaire accepted McGill’s offer of sale
holding that an offer to donate cannot be an offer to sell holding that a price quotation can amount to an offer creating the power of acceptance  if it appears from the price quote that assent to the quote is all that is needed to ripen the offer into a contract holding that speaking to potential customers to determine an appropriate price does not constitute an offer for sale holding that the measure of damages for the breach of a contract of sale where no fraud is shown is the difference between the contract price and the market price of the goods on the date of the breach holding that a valid contract requires acceptance of an offer