that Mr. Hrezo’s car was parked in an alternate boat ramp in a wooded area away from the main parking area where there were no other people or vehicles. The deputy testified that he intended to make a citizen contact to find out who was in the vehicle and why they were there, and “probably” to tell them that it was dusk and time to leave the park. There is no suggestion that the officer had a reasonable suspicion of any criminal activity or even a traffic infraction at the time he made this decision. Before approaching Mr. Hrezo’s vehicle on foot, the deputy turned on his patrol car’s emergency lights and takedown lights. He explained that he turned on these lights for his own safety and so he could see inside the vehicle. When he approached the car, the deputy requested identi 95) (<HOLDING>); State v. Gonzalez, 2000 WL 1207186 at *5
holding that the arresting officer did not have probable cause to stop the defendant for obstructing traffic because there was no evidence of intent to impede or hinder traffic where the vehicle was only briefly stopped in the roadway and the officer approaching the vehicle from behind did not have to stop or drive around the defendants vehicle holding police display of blue lights after pulling behind stopped vehicle constituted a stop holding police turning on blue light showed display of authority such that reasonable person would not feel free to leave holding that fourth amendment rights of a passenger of a legally stopped vehicle were not violated by police officers instruction that he remain inside the vehicle during traffic stop after passenger repeatedly tried to exit holding that the stop of defendants vehicle was unlawful where officers stopped the vehicle to check the license and registration but had observed no suspicious activity