AK’s testimony was not the testimony of CK, the person AK was quoting, but that of a third witness, Mr. Mills, who was also recounting other statements by CK through a different exception to the hearsay rule. At least in cases involving the abuse of young children and the residual exception, the reported decisions do not appear to compel the Government to choose between several witnesses to essentially the same or similar out-of-court statements by the child. Most of those decisions, however, have not made a substantive comparison of the evidence offered, even though it is apparent that multiple sources were admitted at trial. In McGrath, the Court of Military Appeals considered two out-of-court statements by the victim even though she testified at trial and did not limit the G ) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Powell, 22 M.J. 141
holding childvictims statement to police investigator admissible under residual exception as well as identical corroborating statement to babysitter holding statement by childvictim to teachers aide admissible under residual exception in addition to statements to school nurse and pediatrician under medical treatment exception holding childvictims statement to babysitter admissible un der residual exception in addition to statement to physician under medical treatment exception holding also that only a childs first statement made is admissible under the exception holding heroin overdose victims statement to police identifying her source admissible under residual exception in addition to admission by accused that he had supplied victim