of acquittal ... at the close of the evidence offered by the State and, in a jury trial, at the close of all the evidence. The defendant shall state with particularity all reasons why the motion should be granted.” (Emphasis added.) Subsection (c) of Rule 4-324 provides: A defendant who moves for judgment of acquittal at the close of evidence offered by the State may offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, without having reserved the right to do so and to the same extent as if the motion had not been made. In so doing, the defendant withdraws the motion. “ ‘[T]he language of [Rule 4-324] is mandatory.’” Bates v. State, 127 Md.App. 678, 691, 736 A.2d 407, cert. denied, 356 Md. 635, 741 A.2d 1095 (1999) (quoting State v. Lyles, 308 Md. 129, 135, 517 A.2d 761 (1986)) (<HOLDING>); accord Graham v. State, 325 Md. 398, 416-17,
holding that arguments not raised below are waived for appeal holding that where counsel failed to articulate below the arguments they urged on appeal regarding sufficiency of the evidence the arguments were waived holding that prisoner waived first amendment claim because he failed to brief arguments on appeal recognizing that arguments not briefed on appeal are waived holding arguments not raised on appeal waived