Appendix B, at 1329. 3 . Id., at 1341. 4 . Id., at 1339. 5 . See id. 6 . See id. 7 . See id. 8 . In the end, the whole de faelo versus de jure debate may turn out to be insignificant. While the Supreme Court lias not yet acted in cases of de fació segregation, there is compelling authority in decisions of lower courts requiring its elimination. See Barksdale v. Springfield School Comm., 237 F.Supp. 543 (D.Mass.1965) ; Offermann v. Nitkowski, 248 F.Supp. 129 (W.D.N.Y.1965), aff’d, 378 F.2d 22 (2d Cir. 1967) ; Jackson v. Pasadena City School Dist., 59 Cal.2d 876, 31 Cal.Rptr. 606, 382 P.2d 878 (1963). 9 . See Appendix B. 10 . In Swann, busing was ordered for a school district of 550 square miles. San Francisco is less than 50 miles square. The rela 84 S.Ct. 1226, 12 L.Ed.2d 256 (1964) (<HOLDING>) ; Goss v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 683, 83
holding that both saline county and grant county had jurisdiction to try the appellant for murder where the actual killing occurred in one county but the acts requisite to the consummation of the murder and the subsequent disposal of the body occurred in the other county holding that defendants successful completion of pretrial intervention program in one county and the entry of a nolle prosequi as to the relevant charges in that county barred subsequent prosecution in a separate county for charges arising out of the same conduct recognizing county officers as  those whose general authority and jurisdiction are confined within the limits of the county in which they are appointed who are appointed in and for a particular county and whose duties apply only to that county and through whom the county performs its usual political functions  holding that where the murder and robbery occurred in one county but the plan was hatched in another county and the body was subsequently returned to that other county both counties had jurisdiction to try the appellant holding unconstitutional the closing of all the schools in one county