its discretion in denying reconsideration of or relief from its October 9, 2013 order. A motion under Rule 59 must typically be filed within 28 days of the entry of judgment. RCFC 59(b)(1). An exception exists when there is satisfactory evidence of fraud, wrong, or injustice, in which case the motion must be filed within two years of the final disposition of the suit. RCFC 59(b)(2). There being no evidence of fraud, wrong, or injustice here, Ms. Wagstaff had at most until November 6, 2013, to seek Rule 59 reconsideration of the October 9, 2013 order. She failed to do so, instead waiting until February 24, 2014. The Court of Federal Claims did not abuse its discretion in refusing to ignore her 110-day tardiness. See, e.g., Woods v. United States, 122 Fed.Appx. 989, 991 (Fed.Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). As to Rule 60, Ms. Wagstaff failed to prove
holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for continuance when not in proper affidavit form holding that the court of federal claims did not abuse its discretion in denying as untimely a 10daylate pro se motion for reconsideration holding under third circuit law that the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing holding that denial of untimely request was not abuse of discretion