any amounts paid for medical treatment or for other compensation payable under this section resulting from the negligence of the third party[.] * ⅜ ⅜ [T]he amount recovered by suit or otherwise as reimbursement for medical expenses or other compensa tion shall be for the benefit of the employer * * * to the extent that the employer * * * has paid or will be required to pay compensation or pay for medical treatment of the injured employee and does not affect the amount of periodic compensation to be paid. Although subdivision 7 creates a separate cause of action in the employer, it does not alter “the allocation of employer and employee rights inherent in the statutory scheme of section 176.061.” Hodder, 426 N.W.2d at 838. The employer’s recovery is still sub 763, 767-68 (Minn.1985) (<HOLDING>); Metro. Milk Co. v. Minneapolis St. Ry., 149
holding prejudgment interest is to be determined on the entire amount of compensatory damages and then reduced by the amount of interest which would have accrued at present value on the settlement amount determined before trial holding despite not finding undue hardship that it would be equitable to reduce the amount of nondischargeable liability by the amount of the accrued interest holding that when trial court orders restitution at sentencing pursuant to statute the defendant is entitled to notice of the amount claimed and the opportunity to dispute the amount holding that a trial court should calculate an employers contribution due for the third partys future payments by using affidavits and other evidence to determine a lump sum amount and reduce the amount to its present value as of the date of the contribution judgment holding that where the trial court awarded the former husband the value of his pension plan but failed to calculate the present value of the plan case must be reversed and remanded for redetermination of equitable distribution