judgment vacated. On November 19, 2009, the mother filed a “Motion To Amend and Close Case” in which she requested that the juvenile court amend the visitation provisions of the August 5, 2009, judgment to permit the former custodians to visit with the children solely at the discretion of the mother. Apparently, because the motion was filed well beyond the period for filing a post-judgment motion, see Rule 1(B), Ala. R. Juv. P. (“All postjudgment motions ... must be filed within 14 days after entry of order or judgment....”), the juvenile court treated the mother’s motion as a petition to modify the visitation provisions of the August 5, 2009, judgment based on changed circumstances. The juvenile court conducted a t anville, 530 U.S. 57, 78-79, 120 S.Ct. 2054, 147 L.Ed.2d 49 (2000) (<HOLDING>). We note, however, that the juvenile court
holding a parent is excused from maintaining contact with his or her children when the failure to maintain contact is caused by the involuntary confinement of the parent and the parent is precluded from contacting the children during such confinement holding that custodial parent has constitutional right to determine with whom children associate recognizing even federal constitutional right of association does not apply to the right of one individual to associate with another holding that parent has custodial right to prevent visitation with nonparent holding that the right to associate with others as a military company is not a privilege of citizens of the united states