Fortner held: [A] score sheet error is not deemed harmless unless the record conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence had it had the benefit of the corrected score sheet. Here, neither the transcript of the re-sentencing hearing nor anything else in the record shows whether the trial court would have imposed the same sentence if it had had an accurate score sheet. Therefore, the error may not be deemed harmless. Id.; see Cruz v. State, 884 So.2d 105, 106 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). As in Fortner, the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings at bar do not indicate whether the trial court would have imposed the same sentences if it had had an accurate score sheet. Accordingly, the error cannot be deemed harmless and Cooper’s sentences on these A 2001)(<HOLDING>); Horn v. State, 775 So.2d 1007, 1007 (Fla. 3d
holding habitual sentence rendered guidelines scoresheet irrelevant holding habitual offender sentence rendered any errors in guidelines score sheet harmless holding that where original sentencing judge imposed a guidelines sentence defendant could not be sentenced as a habitual offender upon violation of probation holding sentencing scoresheet errors harmless where imposition of violent habitual offender sentence was appropriate rendering guidelines inapplicable holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony