Judge. AgroSource, Inc., appeals the order denying access to twenty-two emails that were the subject of a public records request, asserting that the trial court did not conduct a proper inspection of these documents. We affirm because the trial court’s determination that the responsive emails were exempt from disclosure is supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Bryan v. Butterworth, 692 So.2d 878, 881 (Fla.1997) (<HOLDING>). The trial court considered the testimony of
holding that when competent substantial evidence supports the trial courts ruling this court will not secondguess the trial court on this matter holding that where the record shows that competent substantial evidence supports the trial courts findings that the documents were exempt from disclosure said findings will not be second guessed holding that where there is competent evidence to support the courts findings the admission of incompetent evidence is not prejudicial holding that the court should make factual findings from the record evidence as if it were conducting a trial on the record holding that when competent substantial evidence supports a trial courts ruling the appellate court will not secondguess the trial court