U.S.C.C.A.N. 5014, 5019 (emphasis added). Similar concerns were expressed by members of the House of Representatives about employees “volunteering” to serve as a witness as “an easy way to get out of work for a few days,” Hearing Before the Subcomm. on Manpower and Civil Serv. of the Comm, on Post Office and Civil Serv. on H.R. 10217, a Bill to Amend Title 5, United States Code, to Grant Court Leave to Employees of the United States and the District of Columbia When Called as Witnesses in Certain Judicial Proceedings on Behalf of State and Local Governments, 91st Cong. 11 (1969) (statement of Rep. David Henderson, Vice Chair, H. Comm, on Post Office and Civil Serv.), and “as a subterfuge for missing work,” id. at 13 (statement of Rep. Richard White, Member, H. p.Gen. June 25, 1984) (<HOLDING>); In re Sweeney, B-201602, 1981 WL 24203
holding that court leave under  6322 is not available to a federal employee who is summoned to appear as a defendant in the court action concerned holding that court leave under  6322 is not available to a federal employee summoned to appear in juvenile court in her capacity as the juveniles parent as a party to the proceedings holding that court leave under  6322 is not available to a federal employee who appears in court as a plaintiff in her own action holding that the court without violating due process of the law may conduct a hearing to determine whether to waive juvenile jurisdiction even if the juvenile fails to appear if counsel is present and allowed to participate on the juveniles behalf recognizing juveniles right to counsel in certain juvenile proceedings