Second, Sacker was threatened with suit when the transfer occurred. He had been subpoenaed by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 17, 1997, and his attorney was notified of a subpoena on Sacker’s company on May 15, 1997, one day before the lien was executed on May 16, 1997. Furthermore, the lien was recorded on December 16, 1997, during the pendency of the enforcement litigation. Third, Sacker retained control over the property by failing to record it for seven months after it was executed. Fourth, the transfer was concealed and never disclosed before it was recorded. Fifth, as the district court correctly found, Sacker did not receive reasonably equivalent value for the lien. See In re Consolidated Capital Equities Corp., 148 B.R. 80, 87 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1992) (<HOLDING>); Freeman v. Allstate Life Ins. Co., 253 F.3d
holding that what constitutes fair consideration under the 1970 version of  843903 is a question of fact holding question of what constitutes proper care and education of children is area of public concern holding that generally the question of waiver and estoppel is a question of fact holding that what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law holding it is a question of fact