to exercise ordinary care in providing tools, machinery, and appliances that are reasonably safe.’ Id. at 997 (emphasis added); see also Greer v. U.S. Steel Corp., 475 Pa. 448, 380 A.2d 1221, 1222 (1977). The Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, however, “substitutes a quick and inexpensive scheme to provide compensation for work-related injuries in place of the common law process where the employee must sue the appropriate parties for damages. Employers pay benefits at a set rate and they are immune from common-law 163, 401 A.2d 345, 346 (1979) (rejecting the contention that the WCA and the Occupational Disease Act deprive Pennsylvania courts of jurisdiction over claims arising from diseases not covered by these acts); Dooner v. DiDonato, 601 Pa. 209, 971 A.2d 1187, 1202 (2009) (<HOLDING>). Recently, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court
recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983 recognizing a state law tort claim for negligence arising under a duty to provide a safe work environment holding that employer has nondelegable duty to provide safe workplace holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim recognizing tort of negligence by words