relevant evidence will be more probative than prejudicial.” Shuffield v. State, 189 S.W.3d 782, 787 (Tex.Crim.App.2006). When McCallum complained about the admission of evidence concerning his membership in the Aryan Brotherhood, the State advised the trial court that McCal-lum’s membership went to the heart of the case because McCallum’s membership in the Aryan Brotherhood was the motive for the attack on Pribyl. As Alex and Natalie testified, McCallum believed Pribyl was “false-claiming” regarding his prison involvement with other white supremacists. It was only after Pribyl claimed to have been in prison and showed McCallum the swastika tattoo that McCallum hit him. Gang membership is admissible to show motive. See, e.g., Vasquez v. State, 67 S.W.3d 229, 239-10 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. State, 974 S.W.2d 324, 331
holding defendants affiliation to mexican mafia admissible to show motive for killing victim holding evidence of sexual assault relevant to show defendants motive in kidnapping victim holding admissible bad acts of defendant evidencing jealousy as motive for killing another holding other crimes evidence admissible to show motive where motive was put in issue by defense at trial holding evidence of prior drug use admissible to show motive and the nature of the defendants relationship with coconspirators