Tinoco, is instructive. 304 F.3d 1088 (11th Cir.2002). In Tinoco, a U.S. Coastguard cutter approached a vessel that appeared to be smuggling narcotics. Id. at 1091-93. As the Coastguard cutter activated its lights and deployed a smaller boat to board the suspected drug smuggling vessel, the individuals aboard the suspicious vessel began throwing items overboard. Id. The items were later discovered to be bails of cocaine. Id. The Eleventh Circuit held that, regardless of whether reasonable suspicion for the stop was present, the defendants in Tinoco had no standing to contest the seizure of the drugs because they abandoned the property by throwing the contraband overboard while in flight. Id. at 1117 (citing California v. Hodari, 499 U.S. 621, 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547, 113 L.Ed.2d 690 (1991) (<HOLDING>)). The Court in Hodari, stated that a suspect
holding that an officer may use deadly force when a fleeing suspect threatens the officer with a weapon holding officers may seize any contraband that a fleeing suspect discards during flight because the suspect has abandoned the property holding that hot pursuit of a fleeing suspect justified a warrantless entry into the suspects home to protect inhabitants as long as the police did not know the home belonged to the suspect holding that police officers had probable cause to arrest a suspect where the facts suggest a fair probability that the suspect has committed a crime holding that police officers who engaged in a dangerous highspeed chase of a fleeing suspect were immune from suit