v. Lawn, 940 F.2d 406, 409 (9th Cir.1991), it is a reasonable position, advanced by both parties here, that the exhaustion requirement of the PLRA did not apply to suits for money damages at the time that Panaro filed suit. After Panaro filed suit, we confirmed, without the prescience to anticipate the Supreme Court's decision in Booth, that the PLRA did not require administrative exhaustion if a section 1983 suit sought only money damages, and money damages were unavailable through the administrative process. Rumbles v. Hill, 182 F.3d 1064, 1069 (9th Cir.1999). 6 . Because, based on the record before us, Panaro never filed a grievance, this case is distinguishable from Ngo v. Woodford, 403 F.3d 620, 631 (9th Cir.2005), cert, granted, 74 U.S.L.W. 3301 (U.S. Nov. 14, 2005) (No. OS-416) (<HOLDING>). The question presented to the United States
holding that a texas prisoner who had not exhausted his clearly available administrative remedies was properly denied habeas relief in the district court recognizing that officials failure timely to respond to grievance could be basis for prisoner to show he exhausted available administrative remedies holding that the prisoner has the burden of demonstrating he has exhausted his administrative remedies in his complaint holding that a prisoner exhausted his administrative remedies even though his grievance was untimely holding prisoner who successfully appealed grievance had exhausted available administrative remedies even though he did not appeal the nonimplementation of the recommendation to the corc