saw the crime or was a victim of it. There are simply no facts in the affidavit that would have informed the court whether the witness was, in fact, a disinterested citizen, or was someone wit identification order is “issued only upon reliable information.” Myers, 570 N.W.2d at 73 (discussing “statutory test of confidential informant credibility” with respect to search warrants). Because the application and affidavit submitted in the present case lacked the information required by section 810.5(4) with respect to the informant’s credibility and reliability, the facts provided by the informant should not have been considered in assessing the adequacy of the showing made for issuance of the nontestimonial identification order. Cf Iowa Dist. Ct. for Black Hawk County, 472 N.W.2d at 625 (<HOLDING>). Since the informant was the only source of
holding that a totality of circumstances standard was proper for determining probable cause for issuance of a search warrant based on information from an informant holding that even if information in an affidavit was provided in reckless disregard of the truth appropriate course of action is to sever that information from the affidavit and determine whether sufficient information remained in order for the magistrate to find probable cause holding that noncompliance with mandatory requirement of search warrant statute designed to ensure that warrants are issued upon reliable information required that information provided by informants be ignored in determining probable cause holding that informants identity should not be revealed where informant witnessed unrelated crime and reported it to the police who then only used the information to create probable cause for a search warrant holding probable cause exists based upon information received from a reliable eyewitness