intends to direct the particular attention of the appellate court in its brief." However, this Court retains broad discretion over how to treat a violation of this rule. "The failure to comply ... does not affect the validity of the appeal, but is ground only for such action as the appellate court deems appropriate. ..." W.R.A.P. 1.08. [19] Father did not designate a record when he filed his brief on February 21, 2007; however, he did file a designation of record on April 6, 2007, one day after Mother filed her designation of record. Thus, this Court has a record to review when considering Father's claims, making this case distinguishable from those in which an appellant completely neglected to provide a record. See Smith v. Smith, 2008 WY 87 115, 72 P.3d 1158, 1162 (Wyo.2003) (<HOLDING>); Orcutt v. Shober Invs. Inc., 2003 WY 60, ¶10,
recognizing that factual findings were clearly erroneous where the record before the court was simply devoid of any basis for the district courts conclusion holding that the district court must make findings on the record as to the basis for its conclusion about the amount of actual loss holding that the record supported the district courts award of damages holding the absence of any record to refute the district courts findings left the court with no choice but to sustain them holding that the circuit courts have no appellate jurisdiction over a general district courts review of an administrative license suspension in the absence of any statutory authority vesting them with such jurisdiction