App. 3d 1, 4, 520 N.E.2d 922, 924.) Illinois courts are especially disinclined to assert jurisdiction over nonresident defendants for torts occurring outside the State, where the tort did not arise from defendant’s in-forum contacts which began a chain of events leading to plaintiff’s out-of-forum visit and subsequent injury. (Loggans v. Jewish Community Center (1983), 113 Ill. App. 3d 549, 447 N.E.2d 919.) Although our courts have often used the phrase “lies in the wake” of the transaction to help define the term “arising from” as it is used in the long-arm statute (see, e.g., Loggans, 113 Ill. App. 3d at 557, 447 N.E.2d at 925), we do not interpret such language as creating a pure “but for” test of causality. (Cf. Shute v. Carnival Cruise Lines (9th Cir. 1990), 897 F.2d 377, 383-86 (<HOLDING>).) In the present case, plaintiffs’ complaints
holding that a state statute prohibiting expenditures by banks and business corporations for the purpose of influencing the vote on any question other than one materially affecting the business interests of the corporation unconstitutionally infringed on their first amendment rights holding defendants who operated a boat tour in the bahamas for which tickets are sold by floridabased cruise lines on board their vessels did not have the level of business in florida to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 holding that plaintiffs claim of negligence against a florida corporation predicated on her slip and fall on a cruise ship operated by the company off the coast of california arose out of the alien corporations solicitation of business in the state of washington holding that defendants bank account and open line of credit in florida utilized to transfer money in international commerce was insufficient to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 florida statutes where defendant operated its business in honduras had no employees or agents in florida and did not advertise or solicit business in florida holding that the actual amount of capital employed in the state by a foreign corporation was to be based on the property of the corporation that was within the state and that was used in business transacted within the state