it to the Camden Clerk’s Office for filing, in violation of the Rules of Court and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Docket Entry 4 at 2-3). 17 .The attachment to Plaintiff's complaint lists several letters sent via Certified Mail that he claims are evidence of mail tampering because he did not receive a response. (Docket Entry 4 at 9). The United States Post Office’s tracking service, available at https:/! tools.usps.com/go/TrackConfirmActionJinput, indicates all of the letters were delivered. 18 . The Court takes notice of the fact that it previously appointed counsel to represent Plaintiff in Owens v. Volunteers of America Dela. Valley Promise, No. 08-4612 (JBS-AMD), Mem. Op. and Order of 7/30/2012; Docket Entries 74 and 75, pursuant to Powell v. Symons, 680 F.3d 301 (3d Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). The Court finds counsel is appropriate in
holding district court had sua sponte responsibility to duty to inquire into the competency of an unrepresented party in certain circumstances holding in a case considering whether the trial court should have conducted a competency hearing sua sponte that an appellate court may only consider those facts which were before the court when the trial commenced holding that the district court had no right to apply the statute of limitations sua sponte because it had been waived holding that a defendants refusal to wear civilian clothes or sit in the courtroom did not give rise to a sua sponte duty to order a competency hearing holding that even where subjectmatter jurisdiction may go unchallenged on appeal we have an obligation to inquire sua sponte into our jurisdiction over the matter