47 (App.1979), appellant argues that Juvenile Rule 18 is applicable to a transfer hearing. We find that Juvenile Rules 14(b) and 18 do not necessarily conflict and that they can be read in harmony. Rule 18 (effective April 15, 1970) is a general provision and requires a voluntariness hearing prior to the admission of a juvenile’s extrajudicial statement to a peace officer. Rule 14(b) (Amended Dec. 23, 1983, effective March 1, 1984) is a specific rule relating to transfer hearings and clearly provides that objections to evidence on the ground that it was acquired by unlawful means shall be inapplicable in the probable cause phase of the hearing. It is equally clear that the ruling of Division 2 of this court in Appeal in Juvenile Action 26289-3, 122 Ariz. 521, 596 P.2d 47 (App.1979) (<HOLDING>) has been overturned by the subsequent
holding that a juvenile  has no entitlement to brady materials before the transfer hearing proceeding holding that post conviction hearing act is not available to juvenile proceeding since the child is not convicted of a crime holding that statute allowing for transfer of juvenile to adult criminal court does not implicate apprendi because the judges transfer determination does not subject the juvenile to enhanced punishment it subjects the juvenile to the adult criminal justice system holding that the apprendi rule was not implicated because a juvenile transfer proceeding does not involve sentencing or a determination of guilt or innocence holding that a juvenile has a right to a voluntariness hearing in a transfer proceeding