a consumers power district unless he or she shall be a voter of such district or, if such district be subdivided for election purposes as provided in this chapter, of the subdivision of which he or she shall be a voter. No person shall be qualified to be a member of more than one such district board. (Emphasis added.) SDCL 49-36-1 further provides who is a “voter of such district” for purposes of a consumers power district election: After the selection of the original board of directors of a consumers power district as provided for in chapter 49-35, their successors shall be nominated and elected and shall take office as provided in this chapter. Qualifie nal and statutory provisions before disenfranchising a voter. See Bienert v. Yankton Sch. Dist., 63-3, 507 N.W.2d 88, 91 (S.D.1993) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Becker v. Pfeifer, 1999 SD 17, ¶ 22, 588
holding that although the 1972 election had long since passed the case was not moot because the statute under review would apply to other candidates in the future holding that representation by state officials that they have no present plan to enforce a statute does not divest plaintiffs of standing to challenge the statute because the states position could well change holding strict compliance with statutory scheme was properly followed and this court would not disenfranchise voters because election officials chose a specifically prescribed applicable statute over another statute to which they were not directed as urged by the plaintiff in that case holding that election case was not moot after election because there is a reasonable expectation that the same complaining parties would be subject to that same action in the future holding that election officials acted under color of state law when they in the course of their official duties willfully altered and falsely counted the ballots of voters in a primary election