public's understanding and evaluation of the [department's] investigative process, decision-making and overall handling of an important matter involving a fellow police officer.' ” (third alteration in original) (quoting Tompkins, 46 A.2d at 299)); majority at 74, 376 P.3d at 22 ("[T]he Louisiana First Circuit Court of Appeal ... reasoned that '[t]he public should be ensured that both the activity of public employees who investigate the suspects is open to public scrutiny.' " (third alt l personnel records used to evaluate the performance toward continued employment or promotion” of police officers “shall be considered confidential and not subject to inspection or review without the express written consent of the officer"); Harmon v. Ewing, 285 Va. 335, 745 S.E.2d 415, 417 (Va.2013) (<HOLDING>). Many other states exempt personnel records of
holding that personnel records or conduct investigative records regarding police officers are exempt from disclosure under virginias freedom of information act which exempts personnel records from disclosure holding that the public records act does not mandate disclosure of records protected by tennessee rule of criminal procedure 16 holding that draft pleadings are not subject to public records disclosure holding that records relating to a student court were not education records recognizing privacy interest in medical records requested under freedom of information act