body.") (citation omitted). 37 . Hall, 856 N.Y.S.2d 540, 886 N.E.2d at 165. 38 . Safford Unified Sch. Dist. No. 1 v. Redding, — U.S. —, —, 129 S.Ct. 2633, 2641, 174 L.Ed.2d 354 (2009). 39 . Hall, 856 N.Y.S.2d 540, 886 N.E.2d at 165. 40 . To be clear, in this opinion we are not talking about inspections or searches of body cavities such as the mouth or the nose, which do not raise the same unique Fourth Amendment concerns as intrusive examinations of genital or anal cavities. 41 . "The Fourth Amendment prohibits only unreasonable searches.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 558, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) (citing Carroll v. United States, 267 U.S. 132, 147, 45 S.Ct. 280, 69 L.Ed. 543 (1925)). 42 . Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757, 769-70, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966) (<HOLDING>). 43 . 441 U.S. at 559-60, 99 S.Ct. 1861. 44 .
holding that absent an emergency police must obtain a warrant supported by probable cause to conduct a search of an arrestee involving even a minimal intrusion beyond the bodys surface such as the extraction of a blood sample with a needle holding that a warrant to obtain a blood sample was valid despite a reference to a urine sample in the addendum to the affidavit because the minor inconsistency did not seriously undermine the information underlying the probable cause determination holding blood sample does not constitute compelled testimony holding that a physician employed by the government who drew a blood sample from the defendant for medical not investigatory purposes did not conduct a search under the fourth amendment holding defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in blood sample drawn by hospital