entitles appellant to strict construction and strict compliance with chapter 59 of the code of criminal procedure, and that an incorrect burden of proof was applied to the forfeiture proceedings in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and article I, section 19 of the Texas Constitution. The State asserts that appellant waived these constitutional challenges by failing to present them to the trial court. We agree. To preser 2) (stating fundamental error in civil trials survives today in those rare instances in which the record shows the court lacked jurisdiction or that the public interest is directly and adversely affected); Loera v. Interstate Inv. Corp., 93 S.W.3d 224, 228 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist] 2002, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we overrule appellant’s seventh
holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding an appellant who raised an issue for the first time in his reply brief waived the claim holding that an argument raised for the first time in a rule 59e motion is waived on appeal holding that claims raised by appellant for first time in motion for new trial were untimely and therefore waived