not cause delay or otherwise injure the plaintiff. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, 134 Tex. 388, 133 S.W.2d 124, 126 (1939); see Cliff v. Huggins, 724 S.W.2d 778, 779 (Tex.1987). If a defendant meets all three Craddock elements, the trial court abuses its discretion by failing to order a new trial. Evans, 889 S.W.2d at 268. In his sole stated issue, appellant contends the trial court abused it discretion by denying his motion for new trial because he met all three Craddock elements. However, in the body of his argument, appellant presents alternative contentions. First, appellant argues the judgment should be reversed for the sole reason that he was never served with citation and did not waive service or voluntarily appear. See Kao Holdings, L.P. v. Young, 261 S.W.3d 60, 61 (Tex.2008) (<HOLDING>); Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. v. Drewery Constr. Co.,
holding that a default judgment cannot withstand a direct attack by a defendant who was not served in strict compliance with the appropriate service rules recognizing that immunity may be waived recognizing texas procedural rules and due process dictate judgment may not be rendered unless defendant was served waived service or made general appearance holding that party waived special appearance holding that a party loses its right to contest default final judgment on grounds of defective service of process by entering general appearance unless it also contests service of process or raises issue of personal jurisdiction