of 1934, and not just the SRA amendments. See § 201(a) (section 201 amends 21D); § 27(b) (section 21D amends "Title I of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (78a et seq.)"). Thus, Congress was making the distinction between knowing violators under section 21D of the SRA, and, for example, non-knowing control persons under section 78t of the original Act. 5 . Although the Court initially accepted plaintiffs’ submission and authorized the Clerk to file it under seal, the Court has not reviewed its contents. At plaintiffs’ discretion, the submission shall be returned to them or kept under seal for appellate purposes. 6 . The forms also may be admissible under the business and/or government records exceptions to the hearsay rule. See United States v. Bland, 961 F.2d 123, 127 (9th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Central Gulf Lines, Inc.,
holding that municipal court records were admissible under  official records or public documents  exception holding that gun shop records kept pursuant to government requirements are admissible business records holding that records relating to a student court were not education records holding that data pulled from records regularly kept by the montana department of environmental quality was admissible under the public records exception to the hearsay rule holding that to the extent medical records may be properly categorized as business records such records are properly categorized as nontestimonial