is the difference in value before the damage to the property (the usable equipment value reflected on the Rosen Report) and the value (as scrap) after the damage to the property. See, e.g., Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of New Orleans v. La. Gas moval of the tags, Orion stopped doing so and returned all of the tags to Syracuse. (FOF 175.) Syracuse did not dispute that he had all of the original tags (in fact, he introduced copies of them into evidence). (FOF 175.) Orion offered to have the tags reattached by its contractor, but Syracuse never accepted that offer or arranged to have the tags reattached himself. (FOF 176.) Because Syracuse took no steps to reattach the certification plates, the Court finds that he failed to mitigate his damages. Therefore, the Cou App.1983) (<HOLDING>). While this may preclude relief on Syracuse’s
holding party in breach could not maintain suit for breach of contract holding that a party cannot claim damages for breach of contract unless he has shown his full compliance with the contract and is not acting in bad faith holding that party may not recover damages for breach of contract where its own bad faith caused the other partys breach recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract holding that an insurance contract between the parties and a breach thereof by the defendant is an element of a bad faith refusal claim