at 2,1989 WL 62709; Holley v. Gallipolis Dev. Ctr. (Aug. 20, 1984), Gallia App. No. 83CA7, unreported, 1984 WL 5605 (both Fourth District cases holding that neither service by mail on opposing counsel nor delayed filing with the board is an adequate substitute for timely filing notice of appeal with the board); Andar-Brenner v. Ohio State Dental Bd. (Aug. 11, 2000), Portage App. No. 99-P-0064, unreported, at 2, 2000 WL 1231723 (stating that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal where notice of appeal was filed in the court and a copy was served on the Assistant Attorney General, but notice of appeal was not timely served on the board itself). See, also, Patrick Media Group, Inc. v. Cleveland Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1988), 55 Ohio App.3d 124, 125, 562 N.E.2d 921, 922 (<HOLDING>); Guy v. Steubenville (Jan. 15, 1998),
holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal after an untimely filing of a notice of appeal holding that notice to supervisor is notice to city holding that mailing a copy of a notice of appeal that was filed in the trial court to the city law director does not constitute filing the notice of appeal with the city board of zoning appeals holding same as to the filing of a notice of an interlocutory appeal holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal