a hearing prior to the imposition of a trusteeship is the preferred and normal method for imposing a trusteeship, due process is satisfied in emergency situations where a hearing is scheduled for the earliest practicable date thereafter. Local U. 13410, UMW v. United Mine Workers, 475 F.2d 906, 915 (D.C. Cir.1973). Given the level of deference accorded to an international’s enforcement of the provisions of its constitution this court must uphold an international’s finding of an emergency where the acting official who imposed the trusteeship “could reasonably believe that an emergency situation does not allow time for [a prior] hearing.” Local Union 13410, 475 F.2d at 913. See also Retail Clerks Union, Local 770 v. Retail Clerks International Association, 479 F.2d 54, 55 (9th Cir.1973) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). It is undisputed that (1)
holding that trial court has discretion to determine whether probative value of photo outweighs prejudicial effect recognizing emergency exception holding that appellate court could not determine whether trial court abused its discretion in denying relators motion to compel the other party to produce documents because it could only speculate whether there was evidence to support the trial courts denial holding that the relevant inquiry is not whether the court has discretion to facilitate notice but whether this is an appropriate case in which to exercise discretion holding that district court has discretion to determine whether it could reasonably be said that an emergency exists