opinion was conclusory or inconsistent with the doctor’s own medical records.” Id. at 1240-41. Where a treating physician expresses uncertainty as to his own medical findings, the ALJ has no obligation to defer to his opinion. Edwards v. Sullivan, 937 F.2d 580, 584 (11th Cir.1991). Further, a treating physician’s opinion is not entitled to considerable weight if it conflicts with the claimant’s own testimony regarding her daily activities. Id. at 1241. Where the medical record contained a retrospective diagnosis, that is, a physician’s post-insured-date opinion that the claimant suffered a disabling condition prior to the insured date, we affirm only when that opinion was consistent with pre-insureddate medical evidence. See Payne v. Weinberger, 480 F.2d 1006, 1007-08 (5th Cir.1973) (<HOLDING>); Estok v. Apfel, 152 F.3d 636, 640 (7th
holding that retroactive award of benefits proper remedy where district court made finding that claimant was disabled holding that no medical advisor was necessary when the evidence did not indicate that the claimant was disabled before his dli holding in a similar case that alj erred in failing to consider retrospective diagnosis indicating that ptsd existed from time of discharge from army holding that the alj erred in determining that the claimant was disabled when a retrospective diagnosis along with all other medical evidence supported a finding of disability holding that the alj erred in failing to give the findings and assessments of the treating physicians any weight when the medical evidence and claimants testimony supported a diagnosis of cfs