the plaintiff from that danger to make out a constitutional violation. Id. at 530-31. Deliberate indifference requires the following: "[TUhe environment created by the state actors must be dangerous; they must know it is dangerous; and ... they must have used their authority to create an opportunity that would not otherwise have existed for the third party's crime to occur.” Johnson, 38 F.3d at 201. 9 . Because we hold that Piotrowski’s allegations fail on other grounds, however, we do not reach the question of whether her allegations satisfy the Rule 12(b)(6) threshold for alleging a "state-created danger” theory of § 1983 liability. 10 . When a § 1983 cause of action accrues is a question of federal law. Id. 11 . See also Chapman v. Homco, Inc., 886 F.2d 756, 758 (5th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1067, 110 S.Ct. 1784,
holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act holding that limitations period begins to run on date notice was received at claimants residence even if claimant did not receive it until a later date holding that oneyear period commences on date of discovery of the fraudulent nature of the transfer holding that the date of discrimination is the date on which a decision not to hire a plaintiff becomes effective holding that limitations period on employment discrimination claim triggered on date of discharge not on date of discovery of discriminatory intent