15-day period in which appellant would be entitled to move to extend the filing deadline. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex.1997); In the Interest of B.G., 104 S.W.3d 565, 567 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, no pet.). The trial court signed the judgment here on September 15, 2005. Under Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1(b), the deadline for filing the notice of appeal was October 5, 2005. Doe did not file her notice of appeal by the October 5 deadline, but did file it on October 12, 2005, within the 15-day grace period provided by rule 26.3. Thus, pursuant to Verburgt, a motion to extend time is necessarily implied. Appellant must still, however, have provided a reasonable explanation for late filing the notice of appeal. See Jones v. City of Houston, 976 S.W.2d 676, 677 (Tex.1998) (<HOLDING>); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 (reversing
holding that the bankruptcy court could not extend a deadline for filing a notice of appeal beyond the 20 day extension period allowed by the bankruptcy rules holding that motion to extend time period for filing dischargeability complaint must be made before the running of that period and that court lacks discretion to grant late filed motion to extend time to file dischargeability complaint holding that it is proper to dismiss an appellants appeal for failure to file a brief or request an extension within the time allotted by the bankruptcy rules holding that the plaintiffs motion for extension of time to file appeal qualified as a notice of appeal because it met the requirements of rule 4 of the federal rules of appellate procedure holding jones should be entitled to prosecute appeal on reasonably explaining need for extension to file perfecting instrument filed after deadline but within 15day grace period for filing motion to extend time to file perfecting instrument