that Mr. LeKan-der assumed the $60,000 mortgage debt based on the language of the settlement agreement. She also testified that Mr. LeKander remained in the home, that the down-payment for the home came from the sale of a beauty shop she had owned and sold during their marriage, and that the mortgage payments they made during the marriage came from both their earnings. The trial court was not required to believe her testimony. In re Estate of Munday, 887 S.W.2d 734, 735 (Mo.App. E.D.1994) (“The trial judge is free to believe all, none, or part of a witness’ testimony and may reject the rest of it even if uncontra-dicted”). Even if believed, Ms. LeKander’s evidence did nothing to demonstrate Mr. LeKander’s intent as to how any remaining mortgage b .2d 353, 355 (Mo.App. S.D.1991) (<HOLDING>). See also Kennedy v. Fournie, 898 S.W.2d 672,
holding that the government is not required to present exculpatory evidence to the grand jury holding the defendants claim that he was denied the right to testify was appropriate for direct review when the record was adequately developed to permit full consideration of the defendants claim the pertinent facts were undisputed a pcr hearing was not necessary to resolve a factual dispute and would not aid in the application of the law and the defendants claim was presented not as an ineffective assistance of counsel claim but rather as an error committed by the trial court in excluding the defendants testimony which was not an appropriate basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim holding that instruction on use of deadly force was not required where there was no evidence that decedent had attempted to assault appellant appellant could not retreat or that decedent was armed holding a claim for medicaid assistance provided to the decedent was not proven by the state and the estate was not required to present any evidence to defeat the states claim holding that the state courts rejection of the petitioners ineffective assistance of counsel claim was an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence before the state court