The court will grant Williams’ motion to transfer the Cable-La-Williams matter (including Williams’ counterclaim against Cable-La and Nobel) to the Northern District of Oklahoma. The court also will grant Whiting’s motion to transfer the Cable-La-Whiting matter (including Whiting’s counterclaim against Cable-La and Nobel) to the Western District of North Carolina. The court will deny Cable-La’s motion to strike. 1 . No party contends that venue is improper in the Middle District. 2 . Although unpublished dispositions are not binding authority in this circuit, the court notes that the Fourth Circuit has adopted a position consistent with that reflected in the cases cited. See Nizam’s Inst. of Med. Sciences v. Exchange Techs., Inc., No. 93-2196, 1994 WL 319187, at *2-3 (4th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). 3 . Sterling Forest Assocs., Ltd. v.
holding that the party asserting notice error has the burden of demonstrating prejudice holding that the initial interpretation of a contractual forumselection clause must be made by the tribal court holding party opposing forumselection clause must meet heavy burden by demonstrating clearly that enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust holding that a forumselection clause was mandatory because it provided for exclusive jurisdiction and venue in a particular court holding that forumselection clauses are generally enforceable and a party attempting to show that such a clause should not be enforced bears a heavy burden