between the officers and Lyles to an investigative detention. We recognized this in Commonwealth v. Hudson, 995 A.2d 1253 (Pa.Super.2010), when we determined that an officer effectuated an investigative detention when he took and maintained possession of the citizen’s identification. Objectively, no reasonable person would believe he was free to ignore that command or free to leave. Clearly, Officer Dobbins’ command that Lyles produce proof of his identification would indicate to a reasonable person that this was no longer a situation where the officer was simply asking him to identify himself and what he and his companion were doing in the area. No reasonable person would have felt free to terminate the encounter. See Commonwealth v. DeHart, 745 A.2d 633, 639 (Pa.Super.2000) (<HOLDING>). In Au, the arresting officer, while on
holding that determination of whether a detention is too long to be justified as an investigative stop must take into consideration whether the police diligently pursued their investigation during the time it was necessary to detain defendant holding investigative detention occurred when officer after initial inquiry exited vehicle and approached defendant because officer chose to escalate the encounter to afford greater investigation which of course is consistent with the purpose of an investigative detention holding that having the defendant follow an officer to a police station three to four miles away after the officer had asked for and retained the defendants drivers license reg istration and title was not permissible as part of a terry stop and stating that we understand the hayes decision as eliminating the option of forcing the suspect to go to the police station from the alternatives available to the officer during an investigative detention holding that the encounter between an officer and the defendant did not rise to the level of a terry stop until the defendant gave the officer his license and the officer informed the defendant that he was going to be given a patdown holding encounter became improper detention when officer took passengers license back to police car to run warrant check