See judges' brief at 15-16 n.2. We likewise do not read the circuit court's "confidential" characterization of judicial assistants to mean that those staff persons have, for example, access to the employer's strategy in collective bargaining or grievance handling. The circuit court judges are not parties to the collective bargaining agreement. Instead, we read the circuit court's use of the term "confidential" to refer to knowledge of the substantive business of the courts, and not to a knowledge of labor relations strategies. 11 See, e.g., Rupert v. Home Mut. Ins. Co., 138 Wis. 2d 1, 7, 405 N.W.2d 661 (Ct. App. 1987) (concluding circuit court has inherent power to control its docket to achieve economy of time and effort); Neylan v. Vorwald, 124 Wis. 2d 85, 94, 368 N.W.2d 648 (1985) (<HOLDING>). 12 Wis. Const, art. VII provides: Court
recognizing courts inherent power to issue subpoenas recognizing the inherent power of the courts to issue warrants recognizing that court has inherent power to control the judicial business before it recognizing inherent power of federal district court to sanction conduct abusive of judicial process recognizing inherent power of courts of appeals