even if the activities therein are not strictly intimate and even if the door has not completely closed. 1 . In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding prece dent all Fifth Circuit decisions handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981. 2 . Kyllo, 533 U.S. at 30, 121 S.Ct. 2038. The scan showed hot spots only on the roof over the garage and the sidewall of the garage. Kyllo, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S.Ct. 2038, app; Brief for Petitioner at 2, Kyllo, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S.Ct. 2038 (2001) (No. 99-8508), 2000 WL 33127872; Brief for the United States at 4, Kyllo, 533 U.S. 27, 121 S.Ct. 2038 (2001) (No. 99-8508), 2000 WL 1890949. 3 . See, e.g., United States v. Oaxaca, 233 F.3d 1154, 1157 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Cota-Lopez, 358 F.Supp.2d
holding a mechanic working in a garage owned by a partnership is an employee of the partnership not the individual partner holding that a wife validly consented to a search of the garage when she was married to the defendant was part owner of the home and had unlimited access to all areas holding that son of woman who bought garage door opener was a consumer because primary purpose of the purchase and installation into home was to benefit son holding where condemnation of a temporary easement in an airport parking garage was primarily designed for economic benefit to gain control of the garage at a discounted price the taking was not for public use and therefore was an unconstitutional taking holding that an attached garage is part of the home for payton purposes even when the garage door is open