relevant to the issue of endangerment. Evidence of appellant’s conviction and incarceration is also relevant to the best interest prong of the section 15.02 test. In Holley v. Adams, 544 S.W.2d 367 (Tex.1976), the supreme court held that a number of factors may be examined in ascertaining the best interest of a child: (1) the emotional and physical danger to the child now and in the future; (2) the parental abilities of the individuals seeking custody; (3) the stability of the home and the proposed placement; and (4) the acts or omissions of the parent which may indicate that the existing parent-child relationship is not a proper one. Id. at 371-72. We have determined that appellant’s criminal conduct and imprisonment are relevant to these factors. See In re B.J.B., 546 S.W.2d at 677 (<HOLDING>). Appellant contends that even if the evidence
holding that evidence of the fathers conduct in stabbing the childrens mother alleged to endanger the childrens physical and emotional wellbeing is pertinent to and entwined in the issue of the childrens best interest holding the teenage childrens preference to live in fathers home was sufficient evidence to support a change in physical custody in a modification of a split physical custody arrangement even though the party seeking the change failed to demonstrate a change in circumstances holding that the recommendations of the childrens caseworker and guardian ad litem coupled with evidence of the mothers extensive drug history her incompletion of courtordered services and testimony that the children were happy and doing well in their foster homes were sufficient for the trial court to determine that termination of parental rights was in the childrens best interest holding that the finder of fact is given broad discretion in determining what promotes the childrens best interests recognizing mutual duty of each parent to provide children with support and education suitable to the childrens circumstances