the record because it contained medical information. The court granted the motion in a minute order dated January 4, 2006. Nevertheless, the court’s “Order and Opinion,” dated September 5, 2006, 2006 WL 2571878, which is publicly available, discusses Ms. Flanagan's medical records. The parties never objected to the court’s order, nor have they filed a motion to seal the record in this Court. Therefore, we do not deem the appellate record sealed. 2 . No test results of any type, including x-rays or MRIs, were ever submitted to MetLife. 3 . The disability plan pays short-term benefits following the fourteenth consecutive day that a claimant is unable to work due to injury or illness. Aplt. App. at 125. 4 . Ms. Flanagan saw Dr. Baldwin on October 13, 2003, and he wrote 896 (10th Cir.1992)
holding that as a general rule this court will not consider an issue that was not raised below holding that court will not consider issue raised for first time on appeal holding that this court will not consider a theory or issue that was not pleaded or raised in the trial court recognizing the general rule that a court of appeals will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal recognizing general rule that an appellate court cannot address claims that were not raised below