any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community." Connick, 461 U.S. at 146, 147-48, 103 S.Ct. 1684. As we have long recognized, "[disclosing corruption, fraud, and illegality in a government agency is a matter of significant public concern.” Feldman v. Phila. Hous. Auth., 43 F.3d 823, 829 (3d Cir.1994). The District Court and the parties agree that Dougherty’s report to The Philadelphia Inquirer exposing the School District's alleged impropriety in the award of the IBS contract implicates a matter of public concern. We also agree and need not belabor the point here. 6 . On the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis, the Lane Court affirmed the Eleventh Circuit's holding that the law was not clearly established in that circuit. 7 . See Watters, 55 F.3d at 896
holding that it is not holding that the government is no longer bound by its obligations under a plea agreement when a defendant commits a material breach holding that burden is on government to show that error in failure to provide notice is harmless holding that it is no longer essential to show actual disruption if the government shows disruption is likely holding that the government need not prove actual notice to the prisoner