arking and growling, at most, amounted to menacing behavior, which does not establish a vicious propensity). 13 See Kringle, 301 Ga. App. at 2; Durham, 234 Ga. App. at 773 (1); Rowlette, 219 Ga. App. at 599; Sutton, 145 Ga. App. at 25 (1). 14 See supra footnote 10 & accompanying text. 15 333 Ga. App. 631 (773 SE2d 872) (2015) (physical precedent only), cert, granted (S15G1888) (Jan. 11, 2016). The Supreme Court of Georgia granted certiorari in Green to consider whether the Court of Appeals erred “when it reversed the award of summary judgment to the appellant[.]” 16 See Green, 333 Ga. App. at 633. 17 See id. 18 Stennette, 316 Ga. App. at 430 (3) (punctuation omitted); accord Osowski v. Smith, 262 Ga. App. 538, 540 (1) (586 SE2d 71) (2003). 19 See Stennette, 316 Ga. App. at 430-31 (3) (<HOLDING>); Osowski, 262 Ga. App. at 538, 540-41 (1)
recognizing a cause of action by the owner of contaminated property against a previous owner who allegedly caused the contamination holding that the owner could maintain a 93a claim against the subcontractor where there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the owner was the thirdparty beneficiary of the contract between the general contractor and the subcontractor holding that the current property owner may not assert a public nuisance claim against the former owner holding that where both vessels had the same owner it was not an abuse of discretion to give 75 of the salvage award to the owner holding that the evidence created a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the dog owner had undertaken a duty to keep the dogs away from a housekeeper when the housekeeper had asked the dog owner to confine the dog while she cleaned the house and the dog owner complied with her request on previous occasions