Have you added minutes to almost all of the 35 phones? A. Yes, ma’am. Q. Okay. And the purpose of adding minutes is so that they will—these phones will receive more calls? A. Correct. (Id. at 17-19.) Plaintiffs testimony once again establishes that she has not suffered an injury-in-fact. It is well settled that a plaintiff “cannot manufacture standing by choosing to make expenditures based on hypothetical future harm that is not certainly impending.” Clapper v. Amnesty Int’l USA, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 1138, 1143, 1151, 185 L.Ed.2d 264 (2013) (finding that “Respondents’ contention that they have standing because they incurred certain costs as a reasonable reaction to a risk o ig., No. 3:13-CV-7418, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41839, at *18 n. 5, 2015 WL 1472483, at *6 n. 5 (D.N.J. Mar. 31, 2015) (<HOLDING>). Because Plaintiff has admitted that her only
holding that where one plaintiff has standing we need not consider whether the other individual and corporate plaintiffs have standing to maintain the suit holding that the plaintiffs did not have standing because they may not rely on the expense of credit monitoring and other preventative measures for standing holding that standing existed holding that plaintiffs lacked standing because the case was not ripe for adjudication holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because they did not sue the party with the clear ability to act