as opposed to a municipality: Although the district court found that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Roane County had a policy or custom of deliberately ignoring prisoners’ medical needs, that finding is not on appeal. See Meals [v. City of Memphis], 493 F.3d [720], 727 [ (6th Cir.2007) ] (a city is not entitled to appeal the district court’s denial of summary judgment on an interlocutory appeal). The Estate’s general allegations that the correctional officers and paramedics were not properly trained are more appropriately submitted as evidence to support a failure-to-train theory against the municipality itself, and not the supervisors in their individual capacities. See City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 385, 109 S.Ct. 1197, 103 L.Ed.2d 412 (1989) (<HOLDING>). While an individual supervisor may still be
recognizing that a systematic failure to train officers adequately as a custom or policy may lead to city liability holding that a municipality may only be held liable under  1983 for a policy practice or custom holding that a failure to adequately train will only result in  1983 liability where that failure amounts to a deliberate indifference to the rights of persons with whom the police come into contact holding that a city may be held liable on account of the unconstitutional conduct of city officials only if the citys policy or custom played a part in the violation holding city may be liable for the failure to train officers regarding appropriate assistance and treatment of intoxicated persons