such withholding); In re Kuykendall, 957 S.W.2d 907, 911 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1997, no pet.) (concluding that the former ten-year time limitation was on the trial court’s jurisdiction and therefore did not afford the obligor a vest ed right); Wilbanks, 722 S.W.2d at 223-24 (affirming contempt judgment entered within six months after child turned eighteen, when child’s eighteenth birthday had occurred before effective date of statute extending contempt jurisdiction beyond child’s majority); Harrison v. Cox, 524 S.W.2d 387, 391-92 (Tex.Civ.App.-Fort Worth 1975, wilt ref'd n.r.e.) (affirming arrearage judgment including payments due before effective date of statute authorizing cumulative judgments); cf. In re M.J.Z., 874 S.W.2d 724, 726 (Tex.App.Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, no writ) (<HOLDING>); In re C.L.C., 760 S.W.2d 790, 792
holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction personal jurisdiction may be waived holding that a defendant that invokes the jurisdiction of a court as a plaintiff waives its personal jurisdiction defense in all actions related to the claim for which it invoked the courts jurisdiction recognizing that personal jurisdiction of federal courts of course may be grounded in state longarm or other jurisdiction statutes in civil rico cases holding that former section 1441b defined the courts jurisdiction not the personal rights of obligor or obligee holding that section 1406a grants district courts power to transfer cases even where personal jurisdiction is lacking