jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is reviewed de novo. See Luong v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 368 F.3d 1109, 1111 n. 2 (9th Cir.2004). We affirm. On April 3, 2004, Viray submitted an administrative tort claim alleging that as a result of being terminated from employment with the United States Department of the Navy, she suffered stress and became disabled on July 14, 1983. Viray alleged in her complaint that her administrative tort claim was wrongfully denied and sought damages in the amount of $5,000,000. Because the administrative tort claim was not filed within two years of its accrual, the district court properly dismissed Viray’s action. See 28 U.S.C. § 2401(b); see also Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1107 (9th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, appellee’s motion for summary
holding that the alien tort statute itself is not a waiver of sovereign immunity holding that the tucker acts waiver of sovereign immunity for contract claims does not extend to claims for contracts implied in law holding that claims arising under the sixth amendment fall outside the jurisdiction of the court of federal claims holding that waiver of sovereign immunity under federal tort claims act for intentional acts committed by federal law enforcement was not limited to investigative activities holding that claims not pursued within two years of their accrual fall outside of the federal tort claims acts limited waiver of sovereign immunity