for attorney’s fees and costs. 1 . As explained below, the court considers plaintiff's "complaint” as a motion to affirm the arbitration award. See 9 U.S.C. § 6 (explaining that applications to vacate an arbitration award must be considered "in the manner provided by the law for the making and hearing of motions”). 2 . One panel member concluded that plaintiff was allowed to transition work because defendant's poor quality and delivery performance constituted a material breach under the SAA. This panel member, however, agreed with the damage analysis set forth in the award if there had been a breach. 3 . The Tenth Circuit still recognizes manifest disregard of the law as a basis for overturning an award. See Abbott v. Law Office of Patrick J. Mulligan, 440 Fed.Appx. 612 (10th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Plaintiff also argues that the majority
recognizing circuit split but declining to jettison the manifest disregard standard absent firm guidance from the supreme court recognizing circuit split recognizing a split of authority recognizing the circuit split and applying the subjective standard as more stringent without deciding which standard applies recognizing split