in the following order: the note on the Mercedes; Myra’s credit card; Charles’s truck note; and then Charles’s credit cards. Any remaining proceeds of the sale were to be divided equally between the parties. In addition, the circuit court did not award Myra an interest in the heating-and-air business. Charles also received the miniature horses. Standard of Review With respect to the division of properly in a divorce case, we review the circuit court’s findings of fact and affirm them unless they are clearly erroneous or against the preponderance of the evidence. Brown v. Brown, 3730 Ark. 333, 284 S.W.3d 17 (2008). A finding is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court, on the entire evidence, is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed. 9 (1984) (<HOLDING>); Williford v. Williford, 280 Ark. 71, 655
holding that a trial court may find that a nonowning spouse is entitled to some benefit by reason of marital funds having been used to pay off debts on the owning spouses nonmarital property holding that circuit court erred in failing to consider that marital property in the form of marital earnings was used to pay debt against nonmarital property holding that an increase in the value of nonmarital property attributable to the efforts of one or both spouses during marriage is marital property holding that one spouse may be entitled to a portion of the equity in home purchased with nonmarital funds holding that a nonowning spouse is entitled to some benefit when marital funds are used to improve nonmarital property