(10th Cir.2013) (“A district court’s factual finding is clearly erroneous when it is without factual support in the record or if, after reviewing all the evidence, we are left with a definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made.”). Having reviewed the dash-cam video, which is consistent with Trooper Riches’s testimony, we can easily conclude that the district court’s factual finding is not clearly erroneous. Second, McCoy argues that both the district court and Trooper Riches misinterpreted the left-lane statute, thereby rendering the district court’s reasonable-suspicion-finding objectively unreasonable. Importantly, however, McCoy did not specifically raise a mistake-of-law argument before the district court. See United States v. Burke, 633 F.3d 984, 987 (10th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). Although there is a narrow good-cause
holding that an affidavit did not provide probable cause sufficient to validate a warrant where the affidavit stated an incorrect date uncontradicted by any other specific fact in the affidavit holding the government waived its argument on appeal that the defendant did not have standing to challenge a search when it failed to raise the argument to the district court holding that the defendant who filed a timely motion to suppress evidence based on an alleged fourth amendment violation in the district court but failed particularly to argue that the detectives affidavit was inadequate to provide the magistrate judge with probable cause waived his affidavit argument on appeal pursuant to fedrcrimp 12e holding that affidavit is inadequate if it fails to disclose facts which would enable the magistrate to ascertain from the affidavit that the event upon which the probable cause was founded was not so remote as to render it ineffective holding that a defendant who fails to raise a specific issue as the basis for suppression in a motion to suppress to the district court has waived the right to raise that issue on appeal