obligations among holders of separate easements, subsection (4)," further explains in part as follows: The holders of separate easement rights to use the same improvements are obligated to contribute to the reasonable costs of repair and maintenance of the portion of the servient estate or the improvements used el v. Hoffman, 219 Pa.Super. 260, 280 A.2d 608, 610 (1971) (declining to impose a sharing rule among easement users who were both dominant and servient tenants of the same easement in a tort case in which the plaintiff fell on that portion of the easement located on the defendant’s property and the defendant sought to join as additional defendants other dominant tenants sharing that easement). 13 . Cf. Thurston Enters., Inc. v. Baldi, 128 N.H. 760, 519 A.2d 297, 302 (1986) (<HOLDING>). 14 . Obviously, in some cases, a party’s use
holding under basic principles of property law that easement rights are subject to regulation by the forest service as the owner of the servient estate recognizing that the dominant easement owner not the servient estate owner bears responsibility for maintaining an easement holding that the burden on the servient estate cannot be increased without the consent of the owners of the servient estate and that the owner of the dominant estate to which the appurtenant easement is attached has no power to convey or expand use of that easement in connection with a tract of land owned by another holding that the duty to maintain an easement was upon those entitled to its use rather than upon the servient estate recognizing that the owner of an easement cannot materially increase the burden of it upon the servient estate quoting crocker v canaan coll 110 nh 384 268 a2d 844 847 1970