the Fourteenth Amendment.” Id. at 711 n. 5, 96 S.Ct. at 1165 n. 5. 12 .We note that this case is not about Beh-rens' relationship with his already-adopted child. With regard to that child, Behrens, of course, has full parental and custodial rights. Instead, this case considers whether Behrens has any protected right or interest in the prospective adoption of another child. 13 . Although the foster family relationship differs from the situation before us, we note that several circuit courts, including this Court, have held that foster parents do not have a protected liberty interest in adopting or maintaining a relationship with the children who are temporarily in their care. See, e.g., Drummond v. Fulton County Dep't of Family & Children's Servs., 563 F.2d 1200, 1206-08 (5th Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>); Rodriguez v. McLoughlin, 214 F.3d 328, 336-41
recognizing that foster parents do not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in a continued relationship with their foster child holding the foster parent did not possess a liberty interest in her relationship with the foster child holding foster parents not liable for willful act of their foster child holding there is no protected liberty interest in maintaining the foster family relationship holding that there was no liberty interest for the typical foster parents in question