and Bernabe. Some time later, they came out and walked to Renteria, Appellant, and Bernabe’s car. After they talked, the confidential informant walked to his truck. While walking to his truck, the confidential informant gave the signal that he had seen the money. The confidential informant drove away, leading iable because some staged drug buys he had participated in before did not lead to arrests and because he did not meet the informant at the originally planned location. Sergeant Brawner testified that it is common for drug buys not to be completed because the other person never brings the drugs or the money. He explained that this does not mean that the informant was wrong or gave bad information. The trial court was entitled to credit this testimony. See Maxwell, 73 S.W.3d at 281 (<HOLDING>). Similarly, it was the trial court’s province
holding jury is sole judge of witness credibility and may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility holding that it is function of trial court to judge witnesses credibility and to weigh conflicting evidence holding trial court free to evaluate credibility of witnesses holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses