action — particularly in that the burden of initiating the forfeiture proceedings, as well as the burden of proof in those proceedings, is on the Property Clerk. Hyne, 557 N.Y.S.2d at 245. Further, to find that these procedures otherwise violate due process of law would be to overturn Judge Lasker’s seventeen-year-old order — an order which has been scrutinized by the Second Circuit and declared to be “constitutionally valid.” The opinion of the Second Circuit in Butler is binding upon this court; and plaintiff h nctive requirements that a bill of attainder: (1) specify the affected persons; (2) inflict punishment; and (3) fail to provide for a judicial trial. Selective Service v. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group, 468 U.S. 841, 847, 104 S.Ct. 3348, 3352, 82 L.Ed.2d 632 (1984) (<HOLDING>). Section 14-140 of the Administrative Code
holding that denial of federal financial aid to male students who fail to register for draft does not constitute bill of attainder holding that a purely financial exaction does not constitute a taking holding that probation does not constitute a sentence holding that the failure to completely disentangle the parties financial affairs does not constitute an abuse of discretion holding that the defendant school officials did not create the students danger or increase their risk of harm where female students were physically verbally and sexually molested by male students in a unisex bathroom and in a darkroom