The lower court found Mr. Brown’s contention persuasive and dismissed the charge of driv ing while license revoked for DUI. Petitioner seeks a writ of prohibition from this Court in connection with the circuit court’s ruling. II. DISCUSSION This matter of first impression presents the issue of whether a driver whose license has been revoked for DUI remains subject to prosecution for driving while his license is revoked for. DUI after the statutory period of revocation has elapsed but before the driver has complied with the statutorily-prescribed steps for reissuance of his driver’s license. As with all issues of statutory construction, we must first determine whether the language at issue presents any ambiguity. See Syl. Pt. 2, State v. Elder, 152 W.Va. 571, 165 S.E.2d 108 (1968) (<HOLDING>). The statute authorizing license revocation
recognizing that where the statutory language is not ambiguous  the plain and ordinary meaning of the statute must be given effect recognizing that legislative history is not used to create ambiguity where statutory language is clear holding that where the language of a statute is clear and without ambiguity the plain meaning is to be accepted without resorting to the rules of interpretation holding that bias interpretation of immigration law is entitled to deference except where the interpretation is clearly contrary to the plain and sensible meaning of the statute holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning