for money damages, it does not provide for injunctive relief in private actions. See 15 U.S.C. § 1692k. We do not here decide whether the FDCPA permits private plaintiffs to seek injunctive relief because the issue is not squarely presented, but we note that every federal appeals court to have considered the question has held that it does not. See, e.g., Weiss v. Regal Collections, 385 F.3d 337, 342 (3d Cir.2004) ("[Ijnjunctive and declaratory relief are not available to litigants acting in an individual capacity under the FDCPA.’'); Crawford v. Equifax Payment Servs., Inc., 201 F.3d 877, 882 (7th Cir.2000) (noting that "all private actions under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act are for damages"); Sibley v. Fulton DeKalb Collection Serv., 677 F.2d 830, 834 (11th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>); Sparkman v. Zwicker & Assocs., P.C., 374
holding that equitable relief under rico is available only to the government holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea holding that equitable relief is not available to an individual under this section of the fdcpa holding that claims for equitable relief under  502a3 are only available when a plaintiff has no other relief under erisa holding that neither injunctive nor declaratory relief is available to private litigants under the fdcpa