the complaint) ]. The undersigned concludes that it is inappropriate to treat these statements as admitted because they merely recite the statutory language and/or present conclusions of law. Instead, the undersigned, in making findings of fact, cites to only those well-pleaded factual allegations in the complaint and the non-conclusory statements in Plaintiff’s declaration. 3 . In summarizing these facts relating to costs and attorney’s fees, the undersigned uses the affidavits and documents that were submitted with Plaintiffs motion for default judgment. See S.E.C. v. Smyth, 420 F.3d 1225, 1232 n. 13 (11th Cir.2005) (noting that a hearing on damages is unnecessary where essential evidence is in the record); see also Fustok v. ContiCommodity Servs., Inc., 873 F.2d 38, 40 (2d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); cf. Norman v. Housing Authority of City of
holding attorneys must present detailed records to enable the court to determine if the services were necessary holding that the lower court was not required to hold a hearing on a motion to transfer holding that court did not have to hold a hearing to determine attorneys fees where detailed affidavit was provided holding that district court was not required to hold an evidentiary hearing based on  2255 petitioners mere eonclusory allegations in his affidavit holding that no reason existed to create a uniform national rule in admiralty where the case concerned attorneys fees and whether the contractual provision which provided for attorneys fees should allow a party to recover attorneys fees where it succeeded on all but one minor issue