P.G. Hospital argues that there is an implied private cause of action under the Medicaid statute for health care providers against MCOs for nonpayment, citing Mallo v. Public Health Trust of Dade County, Florida, 88 F.Supp.2d 1376 (S.D.Fla.2000), Wilder, 496 U.S. at 498, 110 S.Ct. 2510, and Ohio Hospital Ass’n v. Ohio Dep’t of Human Serv., 62 Ohio St.3d 97, 579 N.E.2d 695 (1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 940, 112 S.Ct. 1483, 117 L.Ed.2d 625 (1992). However, in each of those cases, the question was whether the Medicaid statute created a federal right enforceable against a State or i tient did not have a private right of action under the Medicaid statute against an MCO to enforce Medicaid guidelines and waiver provisions); Stewart v. Bernstein, 769 F.2d 1088, 1093-94 (5th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>); Brogdon v. Nat’l Healthcare Corp., 103
recognizing private right of action holding that the medicaid statute did not create an enforceable cause of action against a private health care facility holding that nursing home patients did not have a property interest in receiving care at a particular facility holding that the medicaid statute as amended by the federal nursing home reform amendments did not create a private cause of action for nursing home residents against nursing homes holding that a medicaid recipient who was involuntarily removed from private nursing did not have a private right of action under the medicaid statute against a nursing home