Id.; see also White v. Napoleon, 897 F.2d 103, 113 (3d Cir.1990) ("A prisoner’s right to refuse treatment is useless without knowledge of the proposed treatment. Prisoners have a right to such information as is reasonably necessary to make an informed decision to accept or reject proposed treatment, as well as a reasonable explanation of the viable alternative treatments that can be made available in a prison setting."); Pabon v. Wright, 459 F.3d 241, 250 (2d Cir.2006) (”[T]here exists a liberty interest in receiving such information as a reasonable patient would require in order to make an informed decision as to whether to accept or reject proposed medical treatment.”); Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 U.S. 261, 278, 110 S.Ct. 2841, 111 L.Ed.2d 224 (1990) (<HOLDING>). 3 . We also note that the district court
holding that a child has a substantial liberty interest in not being confined unnecessarily for medical treatment under the fourth amendment holding that under article i section 9 a person has no constitutionally protected privacy interest in abandoned property holding that a person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment recognizing a competent persons constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing lifesaving medical intervention holding parental rights are constitutionally protected fundamental interest