on its holding that the GTLA governs TPPA claims. Nevertheless, the interplay of the GTLA and the TPPA is simply not before us in this interlocutory appeal. On the other hand, because this matter is not final, nothing precludes the Chancery Court on remand from reconsidering its determination that the GTLA controls Mr. Sneed’s TPPA claim and requires its transfer to Circuit Court. See Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02 C‘[A]ny order or other form of decision, however designated, that adjudicates fewer than all the claims or the rights and liabilities of fewer than all the parties ... is subject to revision at any time before the entry of the judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties.”); see also Discover Bank v. Morgan, 363 S.W.3d 479, 488 (Tenn.2012) (<HOLDING>). 8 . "Every version of our constitution has
holding that the final judgment was entered without jurisdiction while a nonfinal appeal was still pending recognizing that nonfinal orders may be revised at any time before a final judgment is entered recognizing that both final and nonfinal orders may be the subject of motions for reconsideration holding that a notice of appeal is timely when filed before final judgment is entered by the district court holding that when reviewing a final judgment we generally also have jurisdiction to review all prior nonfinal orders and rulings which produced the judgment