Tr. refers to the Transcript of Evidence. 2 . The record does not reveal that a case plan was ever entered with respect to Father. As discussed in further detail below there was apparently an informal adjustment whereby Father was provided a parent aide in conjunction with supervised visits with Child. 3 . On motion of the DCS the trial court dismissed the Petition to Terminate Parental Rights with respect to Mother's oldest child, A.S., who was seventeen years of age at the time of the termination hearing and objected to being adopted. Tr. at 7. 4 . Our determination in this regard applies to Father only. Mother did not contest the trial court's judgment and is not a party to this appeal. 5 . See Tipton v. Marion County Dep't. of Pub. Welfare, 629 N.E.2d 1262, 1266 (Ind.Ct.App.1994) (<HOLDING>). 6 . See, eg., Order on Review Hearing dated
holding that parents are constitutionally entitled to a hearing on parental fitness before children are removed from their custody holding that although parents have a fundamental right to the care and custody of their children they have no fundamental right to allocate support to their children as they see fit recognizing need for custodial stability and permanency planning for children adjudged dependent or neglected and removed from physical custody of their parents without terminating the parentchild relationship holding in termination of fathers rights that evidence was sufficient to support finding children were removed for abuse or neglect when previous decree reflected trial court made findings that children were removed from mother under chapter 262 for abuse or neglect holding that although the father did not have physical custody of his children at the time they were removed the children were nonetheless effectively removed from both their parents when they were removed from the physical custody of the mother and placed in another home pursuant to the dispositional decree