extraneous to the record evidences a financial picture different than that depicted in the bankruptcy record. Such information may be unknown or unavailable without the input of creditors. Although creditors may not enforce § 707(b), they may certainly provide information to the United States Trustee or court for their analysis. See United States Trustee v. Clark (In re Clark), 927 F.2d 793, 797 (4th Cir.1991); In re Morris, 153 B.R. 559, 563 (Bankr.D.Or.1993) (finding that a § 707(b) action is not tainted if based on a creditor’s suggestion because the United States Trustee has the duty to independently investigate any allegations of substantial abuse prior to filing the motion); see also United States Trustee v. Joseph (In re Joseph), 208 B.R. 55, 59-60 (9th Cir. BAP 1997) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the United States Trustee did
recognizing federal constitutional claim against the united states holding that the united states trustee may bring a  707b motion upon referral from panel trustee holding that the commandant of the united states disciplinary barracks and the united states are identical parties holding that the united states may bring suit against a state to enforce compliance with federal law holding that one panel of this court is not bound by dicta in a previously published panel opinion