judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Smith’s application for disability insurance under Title II of the Social Security Act. Smith alleged disability due to pain caused by a fractured back. We review the district court’s order de novo, and may set aside the denial of benefits only if it is not supported by substantial evidence or is based on legal error. Molina v. Astrue, 674 F.3d 1104, 1110 (9th Cir.2012). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) provided specific, clear, and convincing reasons for finding Smith not entirely credible. First, the ALJ properly considered that Smith’s complaints of pain were not proportionate to the medical evidence. See Burch v. Barnhart, 400 F.3d 676, 681 (9th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Second, the ALJ cited Smith’s failure to
holding that an alj may consider a lack of supporting medical evidence but the factor cannot form the only basis for discounting subjective symptom testimony holding that a failure to corroborate ones testimony with supporting evidence cannot form the sole basis for an adverse credibility determination holding that the alj did not err in discounting a claimants reports of pain where they were not supported by the medical record holding that lack of medical evidence cannot form the sole basis for discounting pain testimony but is a factor that an alj may consider holding that an alj cannot discredit lay testimony solely because it is not supported by medical evidence in the record