of proving that, under these facts and circumstances, a qualified “ASAP privilege” is appropriate. The ASAP materials in dispute (unlike the vast majority of the documents prepared by American in the wake of the crash) were prepared voluntarily, in confidence and for use in a discrete, limited context in cooperation with the FAA and the phots’ union. There is a genuine risk of a meaningful and irreparable chill from the compelled disclosure of ASAP materials in connection with the pending litigation. In making this finding, we stress that the privilege recognized here is qualified rather than absolute. Like any evidentiary privilege, an “ASAP privilege” must be harmonized with the notion that “ ‘the public ... has a right to every man’s evidence.’ ” 83 F.2d 1488, 1518-22 (11th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied sub nom., 477 U.S. 904, 106
recognizing qualified privilege for confidential presidential communications recognizing a qualified privilege for confidential sources in a libel suit recognizing privilege holding that communications among judges related to official judicial business are protected by a qualified privilege recognizing qualified privilege protecting confidential communications among judges and their staffs in the performance of their judicial duties