that he never obtained any cords satisfy the requirement that plaintiff have manifested deficits in adaptive functioning “during the developmental period; i.e., the evidence demonstrates or supports onset of the impairment before age 22.” 20 C.F.R. Pt. 404, Subpt. P, App. 1, section 12.05. “The requirement of early onset and the reference to the claimant’s ‘developmental period’ ” in the introductory paragraph of section 12.05 “seem intended to limit coverage to an innate condition, rather that the claimant took special education classes through the ninth grade, dropped out in tenth grade, “struggled” to obtain a GED, and had a limited work history supported a finding that onset of mental retardation occurred before age 22); Maresh v. Barnhart, 438 F.3d 897, 900 (8th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). For the reasons described above, the ALJ
holding that circumstantial evidence existed supporting manifestation of the claimants mental retardation before age 22 including the claimants lowgrade dropout and participation in prior special education classes holding that the record was not inconsistent with mental retardation meeting section 1205 where the claimant dropped out in tenth grade obtained a ged and could read write add and subtract but had problems with multiplication and division holding that the alj erred in finding that the claimants mental retardation did not manifest itself before age 22 where the claimant attended special education classes dropped out of school in ninth grade had trouble with reading writing and math and had frequent fights with other children holding that the record did not belie the claimants iq of 58 where he attended special education classes did not live independently and dropped out of school at a low grade either in the sixth or eighth grade recognizing that texas courts have adopted the aamr definition of mental retardation providing that mental retardation must manifest before age of 18 years