that reimbursement rates for many services are already set below providers' costs. (See, e.g., Yelamanchili Decl. ¶ 10; Coughlin Decl. ¶ 7.) 6 . Plaintiffs seek to vindicate wha er a claim to quality services would be judicially manageable where the issue were other than whether rates have been set in consideration of cost of service. 16 . Whether federal regulations can create rights enforceable under § 1983 is not at all clear. However, there are good reasons to think that they cannot. See Wright v. City of Roanoke Redev. & Hous. Auth., 479 U.S. 418, 437-38, 107 S.Ct. 766, 93 L.Ed.2d 781 (1987) (O'Connor, J., dissenting) (noting concerns with allowing regulations to create enforceable rights); S. Camden Citizens in Action v. N.J. Dep’t of Envtl. Prot., 274 F.3d 771, 790 (3d Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). 17 . For example, the Health Net of
holding that regulations do not create enforceable rights when they are too far removed from congressional intent holding that when regulations are intended to have different purposes and are not dependent on each other they are not intertwined holding federal regulations have the force of law and may create enforceable rights recognizing that these two recent supreme court decisions resolve the issue of whether federal regulations alone can create enforceable rights under  1983 holding that because federal regulations have the force of law they may create enforceable rights under  1983