"Memorandum” and the subject is listed as "Johanson Manufacturing Corporation, Phase II, Remedial Investigation Work Plan, August 1992.” 1/13/11 Privilege Log, Ex. D to Kaufmann Letter. 29 . Travelers Ins. Co. v. Carpenter, 411 F.3d 323, 329 (2d Cir.2005) (quoting National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. v. Stroh Cos., 265 F.3d 97, 106 (2d Cir.2001)). 30 . Id. 31 . 379 N.J.Super. 205, 877 A.2d 330 (App.Div. 2005). 32 . 416 N.J.Super. 354, 4 A.3d 585 (App.Div. 2010). 33 . See id. 34 . 754 A.2d 1177. 35 . Id. at 1181-82. 36 . Education Law Ctr., 966 A.2d at 1067. 37 . Id. (emphasis added). 38 . Id. at 1068. 39 . Education Law Ctr., 966 A.2d at 1067 (quoting Integrity, 754 A.2d at 1177). 40 . See United States v. Hooker Chems. & Plastics Corp., 114 F.R.D. 100, 103 (W.D.N.Y.1987) (<HOLDING>). 41 . See Dairyland Power Coop. v. United
holding that the actions were not actions of public and general applicability but were actions directed principally and primarily at plaintiffs holding that an evaluation of the propriety of the governments actions at a contaminated site could be made using nonprivileged materials holding that the determination of whether the debtor is using real property as his principal residence is made as of the petition date for the purposes of section 1322b2 holding that construction company that carried general work site liability insurance did not control partiallyconstructed home at the time of accident when none of its employees had been at the site for a month holding that it is well established that whether an employees actions were within the scope of employment is a question of fact and even if some of the actions were unauthorized the question of whether the actions were within the scope of employment is for the jury