“when the alien is released” from incarceration on the underlying offense. The text of the INA is clear: “The Attorney General shall take into custody any alien who ... is deportable by reason of having committed any offense covered ... when the alien is released, without regard to whether the alien is released on parole, supervised release, or probation, and without regard to whether the alien may be arrested or imprisoned again for the same offense.” INA § 236(c), 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c). Interpreting this statutory language, this Court has repeatedly held that Congress intended mandatory detention to apply only to those aliens taken into immigration custody immediately after their release from state custody. See, e.g., Quezada-Bucio v. Ridge, 317 F.Supp.2d. 1221, 1228 (W.D.Wash.2004) (<HOLDING>); Pastor-Camarena v. Smith, 977 F.Supp. 1415,
holding that the special relationship exception must be confined to cases in which a person is taken into state custody against his will holding that the lower court should have entered a final order on custody holding that 8 cfr  100323b1 does not preclude motions to reopen filed by aliens who have been deported after the completion of immigration proceedings holding that the mandatory detention statute i na  236c does not apply to aliens who have been taken into immigration custody several months or years after they have been released from state custody holding fact that the parties failed to communicate and had continuing hostility does not constitute a material change in custody to warrant modification of custody