Bishop, 636 F.3d at 765. A. Sufficiency of the facts regarding Killian’s inspections other than on January 7, 2000 This court has already determined that Jacob’s backyard qualifies as protected curtilage and that Killian’s warrantless inspections of that area violated clearly established law. Jacob, 531 F.3d at 391-92. But Killian now challenges whether Jacob has raised a genuine issue of material fact concerning any post-incarceration visits other than Killian’s January 7, 2000 inspection (which Killian challenges on different grounds). We have jurisdiction to address this claim because Killian contends that the district court incorrectly ruled that Jacob raised a genuine issue of material fact as to when and how many times Killian entered Jacob’s yard. See Chappell, 585 F.3d at 906 (<HOLDING>). According to Killian, Jacob does not have
holding that the existence of genuine issues of material facts render not appealable a pretrial denial of summary judgment on the issue of qualified immunity holding that when there are no genuine issues of material fact summary judgment is appropriate holding that a probable cause determination is appropriate for summary judgment where there are no genuine issues of material fact and no credibility issues holding that this court has jurisdiction to review the legal issues concerning whether the factual disputes a are genuine and b concern material facts holding that factual disputes regarding circumstances of traffic stop were pertinent to deciding legal issues in motion to suppress and thus hearing was necessary