Coal, the right to a pension arose under . the collective bargaining agreement, and the language of the Pension Plan reflects that the Machinists Union, the Aluminum Workers Union, and Reynolds granted to the Pension Appeals Board the authority to interpret the meaning of the terms “shutdown” and “layoff.” As such, Reynolds, argues that the Court should defer to the decision of the Pension Appeals Board. Further, Reynolds asserts that there is no basis for overturning the arbitration decision, because courts have held consistently that the sale of a plant with continued employment at substantially similar wages and benefits does not constitute a shutdown or layoff giving rise to special pension rights. See United Steelworkers of America v. Abex Corp., 1991 WL 236177, *2 (N.D.Ala.1991) (<HOLDING>); Blank v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 926 F.2d 1090
holding that an alien is only lawfully admitted for permanent residence for purposes of the ina if his or her adjustment to lawful permanent resident complied with substantive legal requirements and that because the alien failed to show that she had complied with the relevant substantive legal requirements the ij correctly determined that she had not been lawfully admitted for permanent residence and was not entitled to  212c relief holding that an alien who procured permanent resident status byconcealing his ineligibility had not been lawfully admitted for permanent residence holding that application of equitable principles in evaluating requests for permanent injunctions under the patent act should not differ from treatment of permanent injunctions in other fields of law holding that the phrase permanent shutdown is unambiguous and can only mean a permanent cessation of plant operations rather than the uneventful transfer of ownership holding that where a temporary order is later made permanent the permanent order may be challenged