person commits the crime of kidnapping in the second degree if, with intent to interfere substantially with another’s personal liberty, and without consent or legal authority, the person: (a) Takes the person from one place to another____ Or.Rev.Stat. § 163.225(l)(a). The term “without consent” is defined to mean, “the taking or confinement is accomplished by force, threat or deception.” Or.Rev.Stat. § 163.215(1). Because second-degree kidnapping as defined by Oregon Revised Statute section 163.225 may be committed by deception, rather than by force, it does not qualify as a “crime of violence” under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(l)(i). We must therefore determine whether second-degree kidnapping is a crime “that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” U.S.S.G th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Patino, 962 F.2d 263, 267
holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which necessarily involves the threatened use of physical force under 18 usc  924 holding that kidnapping involves a serious potential risk of physical injury to the kidnapped person holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which involves a serious potential risk of injury under 18 usc  924 holding that attempted burglary under florida law qualified as a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act 18 usc  924e2biihereinafter acca because it involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another holding that the potential for violence against the victim is an inherent aspect of the crime of kidnapping under 18 usc  924