allowable following revocation of supervised release for commission of a Class C felony); 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(2) (providing for a ten year maximum term of imprisonment for the violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)); 18 U.S.C. § 3559(a)(3) (identifying as Class C felonies crimes punishable by a term of imprisonment between ten and twenty five years). Based on these uncontested findings by the District Court, Dawson’s 366-day revocation sentence is substantively reasonable. Dawson’s sentence was within the guideline range of 7 to 13 months of imprisonment for a Grade C parole violation and well below the two-year statutory maximum. See Hunt, 526 F.3d at 746 (explaining we expect a sentence imposed within the appropriately calculated guideline range to be reasonable); Gonzalez, 550 F.3d at 1324 (<HOLDING>). The district court also properly considered
holding a sentence 110 the length of the 20year statutory maximum sentence was reasonable holding that a withinguideline sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum holding sentences need only be below the statutory maximum holding statutory maximum for prior conviction is the potential maximum sentence defined by the applicable state criminal statute not the maximum sentence which could have been imposed against the particular defendant  according to the states sentencing guidelines recognizing a claim that the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum