arbitrable issues should be resolved in favor of arbitration, whether the problem at hand is the construction of the contract language itself or an allegation of waiver, delay, or a like defense to arbitra-bility.” Moses H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24-25, 103 S.Ct. 927, 74 L.Ed.2d 765 (1983) (emphasis added). The adversary proceeding sets forth twelve causes of action: 1) constructive fraud; 2) fraud; 3) fraud in the inducement; 4) rescission; 5) breach of fiduciary duty; 6) negligence; 7) negligent misrepresentation; 8) tortious interference with contractual relationships and business opportunities; 9) breach of contract/implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; 10) unfair and deceptive trade practices; 11) alter ego/insider liability; and 1 .2006) (<HOLDING>). Waiver The court turns to the question of
recognizing exception to general rule that disputes arising under contract with valid arbitration clause are referred to arbitrator holding that an arbitration clause encompassing all disputes under a contract covers any dispute between the parties that has a significant relationship to the contract holding that because a valid arbitration clause existed the parties had to arbitrate all disputes when the subject matter of the dispute has a reasonable relationship to the subject matter of the contract holding that a homeowner could not arbitrate a dispute over a home repair contract which did not have an arbitration clause on the grounds that another contract for a home addition with the same contractor contained an arbitration clause holding that consideration for a contract as a whole covers the arbitration clause