950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997). 22 State v. Babayan, 106 Nev. 155, 176, 787 P.2d 805, 819 (1990). 23 See U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1; Nev. Const, art. 4, § 21. 24 Fedorov v. U.S., 600 A.2d 370, 377 (D.C. 1991). 25 State v. Barman, 515 N.W.2d 493, 497 (Wis. Ct. App. 1994); see also U.S. v. Armstrong, 517 U.S. 456, 464 (1996) (“ ‘so long as the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by statute, the decision whether or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury, generally rests entirely in his discretion’ ” (quoting Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357, 364 (1978))). 26 People v. Nelson, 427 N.Y.S.2d 194, 198 (Crim. Ct. 1980). 27 Federov, 600 A.2d at 376. 28 See id. 29 Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356, 373-74 (1886) (<HOLDING>); see also Armstrong, 517 U.S. at 464-65. 30
holding that two statutes that are part of the general assemblys adam walsh act are unconstitutional and are severed and that after severance they may not be enforced holding that laws that are administered with an unequal hand and an evil eye are unconstitutional holding that laws with the purpose of placing an obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion are invalid holding that an attorneys arguments are not evidence holding that arguments that are not raised or that are not accompanied by factual and legal support are deemed waived