Congress never proposed to limit the predicate offense to “some special subclass of burglaries that might be especially dangerous, such as those where ... the building is occupied,” and that Congress’s “choice of language indicate[d] that Congress thought ordinary burglaries ... presented a sufficiently ‘serious potential risk’ to count toward en hancement.” Id. at 588, 597, 110 S.Ct. at 2153, 2158. “The main risk of burglary arises not from the simple physical act of wrongfully entering onto another’s property, but rather from the possibility of a face-to-face confrontation between the burglar and a third party — whether an occupant, a police officer, or a bystander — who comes to investigate.” James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 203, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1594, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Matthews, 466 F.3d
holding that burglary is violent felony holding that thirddegree burglary is a violent felony holding that attempted burglary as defined by florida law is a violent felony under acca holding that escape is categorically a violent felony under the acca holding a burglary must be of a building or structure in order to qualify as a violent felony for acca purposes