P.2d 874, 875 (1977) (applying principle from other jurisdictions that “an administrative board has authority to modify a decision at any time prior to the date an appeal must be perfected”); In re Petition of City of Shawnee, 236 Kan. 1, 687 P.2d 603, 614-15 (1984) (rule that trial court retains broad discretionary power to reexamine its rulings up until appeal is docketed in appellate court also applies to administrative board when acting in a quasi-judicial capacity); SAIF Corp. v. Fisher, 100 Or.App. 288, 785 P.2d 1082, 1083 (1990) (“In the absence of a statutory provision limiting its authority to do so, an agency has plenary authority ... to withdraw an order and to reconsider the decision embod ied in the order.”); Hupp v. Employment Sec. Comm’n, 715 P.2 989, 993 (Ct.App.1989) (<HOLDING>). We thus find that the Board was not without
holding that although administrative agency has inherent power to correct decisions this power is curtailed by statutory language providing specified period of time when agency decision becomes final holding that the power of any administrative agency to reconsider its final decision exists only where the statutory provisions creating the agency indicate a legislative intent to permit the agency to carry into effect such power holding an agency decision is not final during the time the agency considers a petition for review holding the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal where the circuit court had the power to remand the agency decision for further proceedings recognizing in the psc context that a legislative delegation of power to a legislative or executive agency permitting an agency to declare what the law is violates floridas separation of powers doctrine