... administrative forums to decide all claims or disputes arising under or growing out of or in connection with the administration of [government contracts].” 4 Report of the Commission on Government Procurement 22 (1972). In 1992, when Congress amended the Tucker Act to provide jurisdiction over “nonmonetary disputes on which a decision of the contracting officer has been issued under section 6 of [the CDA],” the bill’s sponsor reiterated the broad scope of disputes covered by the CDA. He noted that the bill would “amend the Tucker Act to clarify the power of the Court of Federal Claims to hear appeals of all contracting officers’ final decisions, regardless of whether the dispute involves a claim for money currently due.” 138 Cong 374, 383-84, 112 S.Ct. 2031, 119 L.Ed.2d 157 (1992) (<HOLDING>); Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85,
holding that as title vi is a remedial statute the zone of interests to be protected  must be construed broadly holding that preemption provision of airline deregulation act  preempting laws relating to rates routes or services of any air carrier should be broadly construed holding that the fcra must be construed broadly in favor of remediation holding that the term commerce in the faa is to be broadly construed holding  362h should be construed more broadly than its literal language and should be read in conjunction with all of  362