with voters actually waiting in line to cast their ballots. See Dayton Hudson Dept. Store v. NLRB, 987 F.2d 359, 364 (6th Cir.1993) (“Where the conversation is not prolonged, and where it does not involve party representatives’ conversing with voters waiting in line to vote or in the actual polling area, Mil-chem is inapplicable.”) All of the cases cited by the Employer applying the Mil-chem rule involved conversations between a party agent and voters who were either in the polling area or actually waiting in line to vote. See NLRB v. Carroll Contracting and Ready-Mix, Inc., 636 F.2d 111, 112-13 (5th Cir.1981) (finding the Mil-chem rule violated where electioneering activity outside polling place included speaking "with employees waiting in line to vote); Midwest 5, 1140 (7th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Since the Milchem rule does not apply, the
holding that the measure of damages for breaching a building construction contract is ordinarily such sum as is required to make the building conform to the contract holding that rental value was properly included as part of damages on action for breach of building contract where contractor failed to complete building within contracted time holding that electioneering approximately fifty feet from entrance to building did not violate the milchem rule where those waiting in line to vote were inside the building while the polls were open holding that speaking to employees in a parking lot near the polling place while the polls were open did not violate the milchem rule holdingextra expense coverage for the construction of a new building when the insured previously rented the building contravened the parties intent