CURIAM. Matthew John Wiggins appeals the district court’s order revoking his term of supervised release and sentencing him to twelve months imprisonment, followed by twenty-four months of supervised release, to include home detention. Wiggins contends that his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum provided by 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) (2000). We find that the district court properly sentenced Wiggins within the statutory maximum. See United States v. Hager, 288 F.3d 136 (4th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 391, 154
holding that the district court erred by treating the defendants time spent in home detention as a sentence of imprisonment under  4a11 a of the sentencing guidelines holding time spent on electronic monitoring while on bail release does not constitute custody within meaning of sentencing credit statute holding that due process clause does not require a federal prisoner to receive credit for time spent on supervised release if release is revoked holding that time spent on a highly restricted appellate bond did not entitle a federal prisoner to sentencing credit holding that a defendant does not receive credit against the maximum revocation prison term for time previously spent on home detention