a fixed sentence to be its facial term less the statutory credit available as a matter of right. State v. Miller, 105 Idaho 838, 673 P.2d 438 (Ct.App.1983). The fixed sentence in this case is viewed as requiring confinement for seven years less a potential credit of 672 days, yielding a net period of approximately 62 months. In contrast to a fixed sentence, an indeterminate sentence allows parole. For the purpose of sentence review, but not as a prediction of actual release on parole, we deem the duration of confinement imposed by an indeterminate sentence to be one-third of its facial length, absent a contrary statute or indication in the record. State v. Toohill, supra. There is no contrary statute or indication here. See State v. Jenkins, 105 Idaho 166, 667 P.2d 269 (Ct.App. 1983) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the indeterminate sentence in
holding that epa regulations do not allow the agency to act contrary to federal statute recognizing division of separate property to be contrary to statute and constitution holding ic  20223 not to be a contrary statute holding that absent evidence to the contrary court proceedings are presumed to be procedurally proper holding that state courts failure to discuss or even to be aware of federal precedent does not in itself render the decision contrary to federal law