Plaintiff Michael A. Park appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. We affirm. 1. Plaintiffs state law claim for negligent investigation is preempted by § 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185, because the duty to investigate comes from the collective bargaining agreement. Hawaii Administrative Rule § 12-60-2(b)(l)(B)(viii) does not create an independent, statutory standard of care. See Lee v. Corregedore, 83 Hawaii 154, 925 P.2d 324, 343 (1996) (stating that a statute must prohibit or proscribe conduct in order 0, 827 F.2d 589, 594 (9th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Articles 28 and 30 of the collective
holding that a defamation claim based on statements in a written disciplinary notice was preempted holding that a claim based on statements made during a formal grievance procedure was preempted holding that there is no legitimate claim of entitlement to a grievance procedure holding that claims based on alleged defamatory statements made during course of grievance were preempted by csra because as union representative subordinate was recommending personnel action against supervisor by filing grievance holding that an ineffective grievance procedure bars employers defense based on that procedure