identity of “Rene Flores” and his background in violation of Texas Rule of Evidence 508, and that the State’s failure to disclose the true identity of the “Rene Flores,” his criminal histor had a substantial and injurious effect or influence on the judgment. Sanchez, 98 S.W.3d at 357. The State has an affirmative duty to disclose exculpatory evidence that is material either to guilt or punishment. Brady, 373 U.S. at 86, 83 S.Ct. at 1196. The State’s duty to reveal Brady material attaches when the information comes into its possession, not when it is requested. Thomas v. State, 841 S.W.2d 399, 407 (Tex.Crim.App.1992). To establish a due process violation under Brady, a defendant must show the following: (1) evidence was suppressed; (2) the suppressed evidenc an Antonio 2007, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Young v. State, 183 S.W.3d 699, 706
holding that defendant must request continuance and present brady complaint in motion for new trial to preserve complaint for appellate review holding that appellant failed to preserve error because it did not present appellate complaint to trial court holding defendant waived complaint holding that because defendant never mentioned brady in motion for new trial appellate court would not consider the issue holding that failure to request continuance waives complaint that state withheld exculpatory evidence in violation of brady