the postconviction court for further proceedings on the additional claims of credit that the court failed to address. In its order denying Mr. Gonzales’s motion, the postconviction court failed to determine whether Mr. Gonzales is entitled to credit for fourteen days between January 2003 and February 2003, allegedly spent in the Hillsborough County jail, and for four months and two weeks between February 2003 and July 2003, allegedly spent in a south Florida evaluations and treatment facility. To the extent Mr. Gonzales’s allegations are true, he is certainly entitled to credit for time spent in the Hillsborough County jail between January and February 2003. He may also be entitled to credit for time spent in a treatment facility. See Tal-Mason v. State, 515 So.2d 738, 740 (Fla.1987) (<HOLDING>). Because the postconviction court failed to
holding that a defendant is not entitled to credit for time served as a condition of probation holding defendant who received treatment in a state hospital was not entitled to jail credit for that time holding that credit cannot be awarded for time served on community control holding that a defendant must be granted credit for time served in any institution serving as the functional equivalent of a county jail holding that a youth detention facility was a jail for purposes of statute requiring credit for time served in jail while awaiting trial