a vehicle involved in a crash occurring on public or private property which results in the death of a person shall immediately stop the vehicle at the scene of the crash, or as close thereto as possible, and shall remain at the scene of the crash until he or she has fulfilled the requirements of s. 316.062. § 316.027(2)(c), Fla. Stat. (2012). At trial, the defendant moved for the entry of a judgment of acquittal (JOA), arguing that the State failed to prove that a crash occurred between the defendant’s car and the victim. The State countered, arguing that the crash was between the victim and the pavement. The trial court determined that there was no evidence that the victim was hit by the car, but denied the JOA motion in reliance on State v. Gaulden, 134 So.3d 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (<HOLDING>). While this appeal was pending, the Supreme
holding that it was impermissible for an officer to question a driver about matters unrelated to the traffic stop after the officer had fulfilled the purpose of the stop by issuing a written warning to the driver holding that police officer may order passengers to remain in vehicle with hands up during traffic stop holding that passengers collision with road was a crash and thus driver was subject to prosecution for failing to stop holding that passengers of a vehicle which they did not own had standing to challenge the validity of a traffic stop holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop