from custody or when the victim is bound over on charges, whichever occurs first.”)(citing Mondragon v. Thompson, 519 F.3d 1078, 1082-83 (10th Cir.2008)). Moreover, several states have found that claims for false arrest and false imprisonment accrue when the false imprisonment ends or when imprisonment becomes pursuant to legal process. See Hoffman v. County of Delaware, 41 F.Supp.2d at 216 (“Under New York law, false arrest and false imprisonment claims accrue on the date of the release from confinement.”), aff'd 205 F.3d 1323 (2d Cir.2000); Adler v. Beverly Hills Hosp., 594 S.W.2d at 154 (“We hold that false imprisonment is a continuing tort and that the cause of action for the entire period of imprisonment accrues when the detention ends.”); Belflower v. Blackshere, 281 P.2d at 425 (<HOLDING>). See also Johnson v. Blackwell, 885 N.E.2d 25,
holding that claims for false arrest and imprisonment under  1983 accrue at the time of the arrest holding that a cause of action for illegal arrest and false imprisonment accrued at the time plaintiff was released from his alleged illegal restraint and not when the proceedings by which his arrest occurred terminated holding that a plaintiffs  1983 claim accrued on the date of the alleged illegal search and seizure holding in a false imprisonment action that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover attorneys fees unless the services were to secure his discharge from the illegal restraint holding that false arrest and false imprisonment claim were not duplicative