plan provided that No-vastar’s secured claim “will be paid in accordance with the pre-petition contract held by the holder of the secured claim”. The Padillas’ plan provided that Wells Fargo’s secured claim would be paid “directly to the creditor”, and that payment would be pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1322(b)(2). Section 1322(b)(2) authorizes a mortgage lender to collect post-confirmation professional fees and expenses by incorporating the lender’s pre-petition contract rights within a chapter 13 plan. Section 1322(b)(2) provides that a chapter 13 plan can not: “modify the rights of holders of ... a claim secured only by a security interest in real property that is the debtor’s principal residence ...” (emphasis added). The Supreme Court has specifically held that § 1322(b)(2) x.2007) (<HOLDING>). However, Plaintiffs correctly note that
holding that  1322b2 trumps  506b holding that it is not holding that 1 holding that a courts prior judicial construction of a statute trumps an agency construction otherwise entitled to chevron deference only if the prior court decision holds that its construction follows from the unambiguous terms of the statute and thus leaves no room for agency discretion holding that an earlier specific statute trumps a later more general one