the number and age(s) of the accused’s family members, whether the accused requested waiver, any debts owed by the accused, the ability of the accused’s family members to find employment, and the availability of transitional compensation for abused dependents permitted under 10 U.S.C. 1059. (3) For the purposes of this Rule, a "dependent” means any person qualifying as a "dependent” under 37 U.S.C. 401. R.C.M. 1101(d). The President has not directed that a convening authority’s decision concerning waiver of forfeitures for dependent support be subject to judicial review, nor has he imposed a requirement that the convening authority’s denial of waiver of forfeitures be in writing or that it be served on the accused. See United States v. Quintin, 47 M.J. 798, 801 (N.M.Ct.Crim.App.1998) (<HOLDING>). 5 . See also R.C.M. 1101(c) analysis at
holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity holding that futility is among the reasons for denying leave to amend a complaint holding that there is no requirement for a convening authority to state reasons for denying a request to waive forfeitures holding that trial court acted within its discretion in denying defendants request for firstoffender treatment when there was no indication that trial court refused to consider request or erroneously believed that such was not permitted holding that before denying petition trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing and state specific reasons for denying the petition