the aberration is an established one and one that has been recognized ⅜ ⅜ ⅜ a total of five[ ] consecutive cases in this Court. It is an aberration that has been with us now for half a century, one heretofore deemed fully entitled to the benefit of stare decisis, and one that has survived the Court’s expanding concept of interstate commerce. It rests on a recognition and an acceptance of baseball’s unique characteristics and needs. Id. (internal citation omitted). The majority opinion ends by reciting the holding of Toolson that “the business of baseball” is exempt from antitrust legislation based on stare deci-sis and congressional inaction. See id. at 285, 92 S.Ct. 2099. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger concurred. Flood, 407 U.S. at 285, 92 S.Ct. 2099. Although h , 457 (W.D.Wash.1995) (<HOLDING>). A different interpretation of Flood can be
holding that qualified immunity is not merely immunity from damages but also immunity from suit holding that because the officers decision to pursue the suspect was a discretionary act entitled to immunity the plain language of  65338b ala code 1975 extended that immunity to the municipality that employed thei officer holding that as a general rule interlocutory trial court orders rejecting defenses of common law sovereign immunity governmental immunity public official immunity statutory immunity or any other type of immunity are not appealable under the maryland collateral order doctrine holding that floods reaffirmation of toolson extended immunity to the business of baseball holding that the business of providing public baseball games for profit between clubs pf professional baseball players was not within the scope of federal antitrust laws