Compl. ¶¶ 88-90. Reading these allegations in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the Court finds that they fail to state a predicate act for bribery. In these three paragraphs there is not one single factual allegation of a specific bribe paid to any insurance agent at any time. Rather, paragraphs 88 through 90 constitute nothing more than vague, general and con-elusory allegations insufficient to put a defendant on notice of any alleged wrongdoing. Accordingly, there is alleged no predicate act of bribery sufficient to support the plaintiffs RICO claims. 3. Money laundering The final category of predicate acts alleged by the plaintiff is money laundering. See 18 U.S.C. § 1961(1); Ray v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 1995 WL 151852, CV 92-5043 (DGT) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 28, 1995) (<HOLDING>) Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(1): Whoever,
holding that defendants state conviction for carrying a concealed weapon was not part of the instant federal money laundering offense even though the concealed weapon was found at the time of defendants arrest for attempting to carry out money laundering scheme holding that conspiracies can serve as predicate acts for a rico conspiracy recognizing money laundering as a predicate act under rico holding that venue did not he in virginia for money laundering that occurred in florida de spite the fact that the money was embezzled in virginia holding that judge erred in not explaining to jury that it could consider predicate acts listed in relation to substantive rico count when deciding whether defendants had also conspired to violate rico