such other parts of the record material to the questions presented" (emphasis added)). 52 . We also note that Ploof did not discuss any of these claims during oral argument. 53 . The State argues that the police officers did test fire the Ruger, but the record reflects that the officers only fired it to confirm it was the same weapon that caused Heidi's death, not to determine the range of fire. 54 . Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 697, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). 55 . Id. 56 . Id. (“If it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice, which we expect will often be so, that course should be followed.”); Swan v. State, 28 A.3d 362, 391 (Del.2011) (beginning a Strickland analysis with the test’s prejudic Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). 66 . Gersten, 426 F.3d at 608, 611-12. 67 .
holding that where larzelere claimed that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to call a concrete expert defendant failed to prove prejudice because she failed to show what a concrete expert would have testified to or how testimony would have cast doubt on her guilt holding that where trial counsel was not ineffective appellate counsel was not ineffective for failing to raise claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel holding that for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim to be established a defendant must show that but for counsels error the outcome of his proceedings would have been different holding that the admission of expert testimony was prejudicial where the testimony was pervasive holding that the defendant had established his counsel was ineffective because expert testimony would have revealed that the childs account of the abuse was medically impossible citations omitted