or development.” Id at 489-90. Applying this interpretation of what constitutes “internal tribal matters,” we held that the Penob-scot Nation’s operation of beano games was “fundamentally unlike” the listed internal tribal matters, was “not embraced within the general term” of “internal tribal matters”, and was, therefore, subject to enforcement under state law. Id. [¶ 16] In Great Northern Paper, we did not discuss the ejusdem generis approach taken in Stilphen. Instead, we adopted the non-exclusive, non-dispositive factors described in Akins v. Penobscot Nation, 130 F.3d 482, 486-87 (1st Cir.1997), and we reviewed legislative history, to aid in determining whether the disputed issue related to an internal tribal matter. Great N. Paper, 2001 ME 68, ¶ 48-50, 60, 770 A.2d at 588-89, 591 (<HOLDING>). The factors applied in Great Northern Paper
holding the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the actions of the federal government holding that the maine freedom of access act does not apply pursuant to section 62061 to the tribes internal conduct of their government but does apply when the tribe communicates and interacts with other governments holding that the ada does not contain a waiver of sovereign immunity and thus does not apply to the federal government holding that the ada amendments act does not apply to preamendment conduct holding that section 102 of the civil rights act of 1991 does not apply to preenactment conduct