understand.” (Deposition of Jerry Eller “Eller Dep.” at 58.) Eller likewise expressed confusion as to whether he made charitable contributions from personal funds or from Eller and Sons Trees’ corporate funds. Court have readily found corporate officers and owners liable under the FLSA where, as here, the lines between personal and business finances are blurred. See Reich v. Circle C Investments, 998 F.2d 324, 329 (5th Cir.1993); Donovan v. Grim Hotel, 747 F.2d 966, 972 (5th Cir.1984). There likewise is no dispute that Mr. Eller also has control over all, or at least most, significant decisions at Eller and Sons Trees, although he sometimes delegates certain decisions to be made by others. As President of Eller and Sons Civ.A. 05-1355, 2005 WL 3543722, at *4 (E.D.La. Oct.6, 2005) (<HOLDING>); Reich v. Priba Corp., 890 F.Supp. 586, 589
holding officer liable where he made major policy decisions affecting the profitability of the corporation holding that while a state statute granted a foreign corporation the rights and privileges enjoyed by domestic corporations it did not transform such corporations into domestic or resident corporations holding president of corporation liable as employer where he inter alia maintained control over the corporations employment and pay practices and had the authority to make all major decisions regarding the corporations business affairs holding that a corporations principal place of business for determining diversity jurisdiction under 28 usc  1332c1 is the nerve center meaning the corporations headquarters or the place where a corporations officers direct control and coordinate the corporations activities holding corporations president personally liable where he had ultimate control over businesss daytoday operations and was the corporate officer principally in charge of directing employment practices