is going somewhere. The same is not true of a motor home, in which people can actually live. In the ordinary motor home, the glass is tinted or shades can be drawn so that passers-by cannot peer in. Moreover, many, like the one in this case, have beds and fully equipped baths, making them in some senses more akin to a house than a car. 630 F.2d at 1326. In a subsequent ease, a Ninth Circuit panel decided that under Williams, “we cannot sanction the search at issue here merely on the basis of the ‘automobile exception’ ”, but upheld a search of a motor home as a warrantless “protective sweep” search incident to arrest. United States v. Wiga, 662 F.2d 1325, 1329 (9th Cir.1981). The Ninth Circuit has yet to determine whether the mere configuration of Ct. 507, 511, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967) (<HOLDING>). The decision that the use of a vehicle, not
holding that the fourth amendment protects property as well as privacy holding fourth amendment protects right to be free from arrest without probable cause holding that on march 13 2004 it was clearly established that the fourth amendment protects people from medical procedures induced by lawenforcement officers holding that the fourth amendment protects people not places holding that to decide whether or not a given area viewed in the abstract is constitutionally protected deflects attention from the problem presented because the fourth amendment protects people not places