by government employee, following attempted assassination of President Reagan, expressing employee’s "hope they get him” in any subsequent attempts; reasoned that context of statement — a political discussion — reveáled that statement addressed matter of public concern rather than making an actionable threat); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105, 107- 09, 94 S.Ct. 326, 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973) (antiwar protester’s statement, to no one in particular, that “[w]e’ll take the f-ing street later” was protected by First Amendment); Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444, 446-49, 89 S.Ct. 1827, 23 L.Ed.2d 430 (1969) (Ku Klux Klan leader's referencing "possibility” of “revengeance” fell short of specific threat of violence and was protected by First Amendment); Watts, 394 U.S. at 706, 708, 89 S.Ct. 1399 (<HOLDING>). 240 . 402 U.S. 415, 91 S.Ct. 1575, 29 L.Ed.2d
holding utterance that if they ever make me carry a rifle upon being drafted into the us military the first man i want to get in my sights is lbj was merely a kind of very crude offensive method of stating a political opposition to the president and was thus protected by the first amendment holding that with the commands of the first amendment clearly in mind a comment that the first man i want to get in my sights is lbj was political hyperbole which did not constitute a willful threat against the president holding that 18year old vietnam protestor who stated if they ever make me carry a rifle the first man i want to get in my sights is lbj did not violate  871 because the comment constituted political hyperbole protected by the first amendment holding judges offensive comments made on television show fully protected by first amendment holding that the following statement conditional in nature and made at a political rally was not a true threat if they ever make me carry a rifle the first man i want to get in my sights is lbj