This was ... reduced to a third-degree felony to a level of offense where I might have been willing to consider probation, but based upon [your] conduct thereafter, I just don't believe that you're a candidate for probation, Mr. Harvey. You've been a fugitive for a year and a half which tells me you are not supervise-able. I can't trust you on probation if I can't trust you to even show up to court when you're supposed to be here. Therefore, I will adopt the recommendation of AP & P and impose zero to five in the State prison to commence forthwith. 2 . It is worth noting that many federal courts have also concluded that a defendant's inaccurate sentencing expectations do not render a plea constitutionally defective. See, e.g., United States v. Gunter, 620 F.3d 642, 647 (6th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Bowlin, 534 F.3d 654, 660
holding that an inaccurate sentencing estimate did not render a plea unknowing unintelligent or involuntary because the defendant was informed of the statutory maximum holding an attorneys mistaken prediction about a possible sentence does not render a defendants plea unknowing and involuntary holding that a defense attorneys failure to uncover a defendants prior felony convictions and the attorneys inaccurate sentencing prediction did not render the defendants plea unknowing and involuntary because the defendant knew at the time he pleaded guilty what his sentence might be holding defendant cannot waive claims of an illegal sentence a sentence violating terms of plea agreement an unknowing and involuntary plea and ineffective assistance of counsel holding that since sex offender registration was not a direct consequence of the plea the failure to warn of such a requirement did not render the pleas unknowing or unintelligent