Code in 1994. It conveyed the Congressional intent that a cure in bankruptcy pursuant to a Chapter 13 plan, should put the debtor and the creditor in the same position as was bargained for under the provisions of the parties’ agreement and applicable non-bankruptcy law. The analysis of Section 1322(e) is a two part process. First, as a threshold matter, the amount necessary to cure must be in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Second, the amount sought to be included must not otherwise be forbidden by applicable, non-bankruptcy law. Section 1322(e) does not provide for the inclusion of an item in an arrearage claim that would be permitted under applicable non-bankruptcy law that was not included in the underlying agreement. See In re Hoover, 254 B.R. 492 (Bankr.N.D.Okla.2000), (<HOLDING>). Debtors’ attorney urges the Court to read the
holding that a claim for interest on a money judgment did not accrue until the judgment was rendered which was the date on which the trial court issued its order holding that when an oversecured creditor seeks interest on its claim courts apply the interest rate provided for in the contract holding that creditor held a purchase money security interest in household furniture by virtue of assignment of the retail installment contract from the seller holding that although applicable nonbankruptcy law would allow interest on unpaid installment arrears the parties agreement did not provide for such interest but only provided for a 500 fee for each unpaid installment which could be included in the proof of claim and that because the agreement provided for interest on money advanced for insurance and such interest was not otherwise prohibited by nonbankruptcy law its allowance was not contrary to section 1322e holding that codebtor relief should be granted to collect accruing unpaid interest