conclude that the Fourth Amendment analysis under California v. Greenwood, supra, provides adequate protection against searches of a garbage container left at the curb of one’s residence. Our interpretation is in accord with the'majority of jurisdictions as noted in American Law Reports: . . . The vast majority of courts have ruled that when garbage is located in a place accessible to the public, the individual who placed that garbage for collection either abandoned it or has no reasonable expectation of privacy therein, thus rendering any search and seizure of that trash lawful. Kimberly J. Winbush, Searches and Seizures: Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in Contents of Garbage or Trash Receptacle, 62 A.L.R. 5th 1 (1998). But see State v. Boland, 115 Wash. 2d 571, 800 P.2d 1112 (1990) (<HOLDING>). We turn next to appellants’ claim that the
holding that strip search incident to arrest was not per se unreasonable but holding that search was performed in an unreasonable manner when conducted in view of the public holding that search of backpack constituted a search of defendants person and was not authorized by search warrant for premises holding that vehicular search incident to arrest for traffic offense is unreasonable under state constitution holding that a private figure plaintiff offended by a statement about his private affairs should not be held to convincing clarity standard of proof holding that police search of bolands trash constituted an unreasonable intrusion into his private affairs which was prohibited by washington constitution