constituted a valid advance waiver of his privacy rights because he agreed to permit the search “in order to obtain the government’s business.” Id. at 628, 66 S.Ct. at 1279, 90 L.Ed. at 1482. Second, the search itself was not carried out in an unreasonable manner, but was done during regular business hours and without any threats or force. Id. When consent in any form is used to support a search, the concern of the Search and Seizure Clause is that the consent be real and not a “pretext for the unjustified police .intrusion against which the Fourth Amendment is directed.” Schneckloth, 412 U.S. at 228, 98 S.C 0 (1988) (finding consent-search provision as part of probation was voluntarily obtained during plea negotiations); State v. Gawron, 112 Idaho 841, 736 P.2d 1295, 1297 (1987) (<HOLDING>); State v. Devore, 134 Idaho 344, 2 P.3d 153,
holding conditional release into society of probationer decreases expectation of privacy holding that inclusion of a general release was merely a suggestion of how to terminate the lawsuit and that acceptance was not qualified on use of the specific release and party was willing to discuss the terms of a release recognizing repayment of damages to society as remedial holding that a release of unknown claims has no effect in the absence of evidence apart from the words of the release holding parolee voluntarily agreed to consentsearch provision as a condition of release into society