after the claim accrues: (6)(a) An action may not be instituted on a claim against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions unless the claimant presents the claim in writing to the appropriate agency, and also, except as to any claim against a municipality or the Florida Space Authority, presents such claim in writing to the Department of Financial Services, within 3 years after such claim accrues.... 2 . On April 9, 2009, Andrew Gerson withdrew as counsel for Ms. Cabral. 3 . We question whether the statute of limitations had actually expired. The dates presented and relied upon do not conclusively establish that the notice of claim had not been served "within 3 years” after the claim accrued. See § 768.28(6)(a), Fla. Stat. (2010); McMillen v. Hamilton, 48 So.2d 162 (Fla.1950) (<HOLDING>); Blacks Law Dictionary 1437 (5th ed. 1979)
holding that the charge was timely when filed within the statute of limitations period even though served after the period holding in the context of the 90day period during which a plaintiff must bring suit after receiving a right to sue letter that in the absence of a recognized equitable consideration the court cannot extend the limitations period by even one day holding that a bankruptcy rule equivalent to rule 6a ala r civ p should be construed to give the benefit of extending the deadline for submission to the day after the holiday regardless of whether the deadline is expressed as the last day of a period of days or as a date certain holding that in computing time to determine whether an act was performed within a specified period of time under the statute of limitations the first day is excluded and the last day of the period is included holding that removal under the second paragraph of  1446b did not apply and defendants therefore had removed outside of the thirty day time period triggered at the time of service of the complaint