is, “[ejxcept as provided in paragraph (r) of this subsection, and § 3.501(e) and (g), date of last payment on an erroneous award based solely on administrative error or error in judgment.” Paragraph (r) pertains to service connection and is not applicable to the circumstances here where there is a change in a beneficiary’s income that affects a pension award. Sections 3.501(e) and (g) pertain to a change in employability or evaluation, respectively, and are similarly not relevant here. The plain language of § 3.500(b)(2) provides that, except for what is provided for in those two provisions, when there is an erroneous award based solely on administrative error, the effective date will be the date of the last payment. See Johnson v. McDonald, 762 F.3d 1362, 1365-66 (Fed.Cir.2014) (<HOLDING>). Because paragraph (c), which pertains to
holding that the plain language of 38 cfr  3321b1 provides for referral for extraschedular consideration based on the collective impact of multiple disabilities holding the plain language of the collective bargaining agreement did not manifest an intent to require trustees to arbitrate contribution claims holding when ordinance language is clear courts must give language its plain meaning holding plain language of act provides cause of action only against participating hospitals holding that 38 cfr  201106 as then worded was dispositive of the interpretation of 38 usc  1311 and required de novo determination of the veterans disability upon the entirety of the record including any new evidence presented by the surviving spouse