claims against the TABC were eventually settled and dismissed. The claim against the County based on the strip search of Ms. Jimenez proceeded to trial. The jury entered a verdict finding the County liable for violating Ms. Jimenez’s rights under the Fourth Amendment and imposing actual damages of $55,000, as well as punitive damages of $5,000 against Sheriff Daugherty. The Jimenezes then sought $222,780 in attorney fees and $43,337.83 in expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Upon review of the claimed fees, the district court granted $157,394.60 in fees and $37,153.95 in expenses. The County appeals from both the judgment against it and the fee award. II The County argues that it was not required to base its search of Ms. Jimenez on reasonable suspicion for two reasons. First, it (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1020, 107 S.Ct. 3263,
holding that mandatory visual strip search policy in county jail was unconstitutional holding that mandatory routine visual strip search policy for all arrestees who were to be introduced into general jail population was constitutional holding a visual strip and visual cavity search unreasonable when done beside a police car holding that mandatory visual strip search policy at correctional institution intake center was unconstitutional holding unconstitutional blanket jail policy of subjecting all arrestees to strip and visual body cavity searches