Guidelines, the two incidents of abscondment, and the fact that Redmond was only originally located after being identified as the victim of gun violence, the court found that “[t]wo times is too many” and sentenced Mm to the statutory maximum sentence of 22 months. “These discussions demonstrate the court’s consideration of the relevant statutory factors, and show that the sentence imposed was a carefully considered exercise of discretion.” United States v. Brown, 203 F.3d 557, 558 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam). Furthermore, in response to Redmond’s claims that his sentence is generally excessive, the Eighth Circuit has upheld similar above-Guidelines sentences for violations of supervised release. See, e.g., United States v. Herbeck, 282 Fed.Appx. 490, 491-92 (8th Cir.2008) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); Larison, 432 F.3d at 924 (holding that, where
holding the district courts revocation of defendants term of supervised release did not end the courts jurisdiction over defendants release holding that reasonableness review applies to a sentence imposed upon a revocation of supervised release holding that defendants 36month aboveguidelines but belowstatutorymaximum sentence upon revocation of supervised release was not unreasonable where the district court had discussed both the guidelines and other  3553a factors during sentencing holding that defendants 46month aboveguidelines sentence upon revocation of supervised release was not unreasonable even where the guidelines recommended a sentence of only seven to thirteen months holding that sentence is reasonable when the district court properly addresses sentencing factors of  3553a