by law, the head of an agency may ... grant ... danger pay allowance ... to an employee of his/her agency and require an accounting therefor, subject to the provisions of these regulations and the availability of funds”); DSSR § 031.2. (stating that “danger pay allowance prescribed in Chapter 650 ... may be granted to employees defined in Section 040i”). In fact, the DSSR specifically contemplates that agency heads may decide not to grant danger pay allowances that are authorized by the DSSR, stating that “[wjith-in the scope of these regulations, the head of an agency may issue such further implementing regulations as he/she may deem necessary for the guidance of his/her agency with regard to the granting of and accounting for these payments.” DSSR § 013. See Roberts, 745 F.3d at 1165 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiffs’ claim that pursuant to the DSSR,
holding that dssr provisions concerning living quarters allowances are only moneyauthorizing and are not moneymandating because section 013 contemplates that agencies may promulgate further regulations as he or she deems appropriate with regard to the granting of allowances holding that attorneys are not debt relief agencies recognizing that administrative agencies are not bound by rules of evidence recognizing that state agencies which are independent of the state are citizens of the state holding that unless remand from the bia is qualified or limited to a specific purpose an ij may consider any and all matters he  deems appropriate in the exercise of his administrative discretion or which are brought to his attention in compliance with the appropriate regulations