favor keeping tax returns confidential when possible, and have ordered production only when the relevance of the information is clear and there is a compelling need.”); Camp v. Correctional Medical Services, 2009 WL 424723 at *2 (M.D.Ala. Feb. 17, 2009) (applying a two-prong test: (1) find that the returns are relevant to the subject matter of the action; and (2) there is a compelling need for the returns because the information contained therein is not otherwise readily obtainable); Water Out Drying Corp. v. Allen, 2006 WL 1642215 at *1 (W.D.N.C. June 7, 2006) (“Disclosure of tax returns is disfavored and courts should exercise great caution in ordering disclosure of tax returns.”). 7 . Hard Rock Cafe Licensing Corp. v. Concession Servs., Inc., 955 F.2d 1143, 1152 (7th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); Louis Vuitton S.A. v. Lee, 875 F.2d 584, 590
recognizing the general rule that the landlord is not liable for dangerous conditions existing once the tenant takes possession of the premises holding flea marketer landlord liable for contributory infringement for sales of counterfeit goods on premises but only where landlord knowingly permitted such sales or was willfully blind holding the landlord did not trespass when his agent entered the premises for the purpose of showing them to a potential tenant recognizing that the burden is on the landlord in a lease dispute to establish that the lease contract had been breached and that such breach entitled the landlord to the possession of the property in question holding that a landlord has a duty of reasonable care over common areas or other areas over which the landlord has retained control