Deichman, 2009 Ark. 299, 319 S.W.3d 239. However, we will not reverse a trial court’s refusal to give a proffered instruction unless there was an abuse of Indiscretion. Id. It appears that appellant never attempted to proffer special interrogatories different from the three that were submitted to the jury. Therefore, his argument that the appellees failed to proffer clear, complete interrogatories is waived. Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 51 states that “[n]o party may assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto ..., and no party may assign as error the failure to instruct on any issue unless such party has submitted a proposed instruction on that issue.” See also Peoples Bank & Trust Co. v. Wallace, 290 Ark. 589, 721 S.W.2d 659 (1986) (<HOLDING>). Appellant did proffer two jury instructions
holding party must make timely and specific objection at trial to preserve issue for appellate review holding that a party must submit a proposed instruction to preserve an objection for appeal holding that a party fails to preserve an evidentiary issue for appeal not only by failing to make a specific objection but also by making the wrong specific objection holding that general objection did not preserve error on appeal holding that in order to preserve an issue for review a party must make a timely and specific objection at trial