to law, cause the intoxication of another by providing the other person with alcoholic beverages. Krupp argues that the legislative purpose behind the Dram Shop Act was to punish the owners of bars or taverns who serve alcohol for consumption on their premises to people who are already intoxicated. See McIsaac v. Monte Carlo Club, Inc., 587 So.2d 320 (Ala.1991). Krupp contends that 20-x-6-.15(2) illegally extends potential liability to off-premises licensees, i.e., those who sell alcohol for consumption off their premises. The doctrine of separation of powers does not prohibit the legislature from delegating power to execute and administer laws, so long as the delegation carries reasonably clear standards governing execution and administration. Folsom v. Wynn, 631 So .2d 890 (Ala.1993) (<HOLDING>). The enactment of the Alcoholic Beverage
holding that the governor erred in considering evidence that was not before the board holding that any delegation of legislative authority was permissible without deciding whether there was in fact any delegation holding that the proration statute was not an unconstitutional delegation of authority but that the governor had acted unconstitutionally when he imposed five percent proration on the judiciary without considering whether the remaining ap propriations were adequate for the judiciary to perform its constitutionally mandated duties holding that the governor had no power to make the appointment of officer of the school commissioner for cecil county without the consent of the senate when the office was not vacant because the legislature which had created and therefore controlled the office had not delegated that power to the governor holding that a states governor and attorney general were not proper defendants when they had no power to enforce the challenged statute