ifp has been denied, a defendant could be served with a complaint well after the limitations period has expired simply because the plaint that specifies the time in which a plaintiff must pay the filing fee after an ifp motion has been denied. See, e.g., Williams-Guice, 45 F.3d at 163 (“Local Rule 11D in the Northern District of Illinois gives a plaintiff 15 days to pay the docket fee following denial of an application for leave to proceed IFP.”). The Local Rules of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania do not address this issue, and for that reason, the Court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to a “reasonable” time. If these principles are ap 103-day delay is unreasonable, where the local rules provided for a 15-day grace period after an ifp motion denial); Rodgers, 790 F.2d at 1553 (<HOLDING>). The Court now considers whether there was
holding that a five month delay is unreasonable holding that a five month delay was unreasonable holding that a six month delay was unreasonable holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable holding that a one month delay is acceptable