purpose of having a state law claim adjudicated in the federal system.” Davis, 856 F.2d at 651 (emphasis added). Thus, a dismissal for insubstantiality is “appropriate in only the rarest of circumstances where ... the complaint is deemed totally implausible.” Apple v. Glenn, 183 F.3d 477, 480 (6th Cir.1999); see Ricketts v. Midwest Nat. Bank, 874 F.2d 1177, 1182 (7th Cir.1989) (“insubstantiality dismissals should be ap plied only in extraordinary circumstances”). If the “complaint raises an arguable question of law which the court may ultimately resolve against the plaintiff,” the more appropriate mechanism for dismissal is Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Ricketts, 874 F.2d at 1182 n. 6; see Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 326 & n. 6, 109 S.Ct. 1827, 104 L.Ed.2d 338 (1989) (<HOLDING>). Applying these principles, it seems to me
holding that rule 12b1 insubstantiality dismissal is appropriate if based on the judges disbelief of a complaints factual allegations whereas a rule 12b6 dismissal is appropriate where while operating under the assumption that all or a set of facts in the complaint are true without regard to whether it is based on an outlandish legal theory or on a close but ultimately unavailing one it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations holding that rule 12b6 dismissal is proper where it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations holding that dismissal pursuant to rule 12b6 is appropriate if the plaintiff is unable to articulate enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face holding that dismissal is inappropriate unless it is clear that no relief could be granted under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with the allegations holding that a court may dismiss a claim under 12b6 only if it appears to a certainty that no relief can be granted under any set of facts provable in support of its allegations or if the allegations accepted as true do not present a claim upon which relief legally can be obtained