marriage could not bring a subsequent divorce action based upon that conduct; under Kentucky law, res judicata includes every matter that is offered and received or might have been submitted to sustain or defeat a claim or demand); 1 Norman J. Singer, Sutherland Statutory Construction, § 2.07 (5th ed.1993) (the principle of estoppel by judgment has been applied to bar the reopening of a judicial decision that has become final, even where the decision was based on a statute that was later declared unconstitutional in other proceedings). Ab initio consideration of the issue of grandparent visitation in this case also would contravene the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. See U.S. Const., art. IV, § 1; Ashwood v. Ashwood, 371 So.2d 924, 928 (Ala.Civ.App.1979) (<HOLDING>). The Houston Circuit Court had jurisdiction in
holding that a federal court must enforce a state court judgment under the full faith and credit statute where diversity jurisdiction exists holding that the trial court had continuing jurisdiction over all subsequent custody orders once the trial court acquired jurisdiction holding that constitutional error was waived even though petitioner repeatedly used the phrase full faith and credit because petitioner did not cite to the federal constitution or to any cases relying on the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution holding that personal jurisdiction is not required to make an outofstate parent a party to custody action where the state court has subject matter jurisdiction under the uniform child custody jurisdiction act holding that even though alabama court had jurisdiction over the parties and the issue of custody previous custody order issued by a pennsylvania court was entitled to full faith and credit under us constitution art iv  1