Lucas CR., Docket 18; see also 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). On April 30, 2007, the court sentenced Mr. Lucas to fifteen years in prison followed by five years of supervised release. (Lucas CR., Docket 26 at p. 1). On March 25, 2013, Mr. Lucas filed his first motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. Jerome Lucas v. United States, CIV. 13-5021, Docket l. The court adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, dismissed Mr. Lucas’ § 2255 petition with prejudice and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. (Lucas CIV. 1, Docket 8). Mr. Lucas did not appeal. On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court determined the residual clause of the ACCA was unconstitutionally vague. Johnson v. United States, - U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 2551, 2563, 192 L.Ed.2d 569 (2015) (<HOLDING>). On October 30, 2015, the United States Court
holding that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the acca violates the constitutions guarantee of due process holding residual clause of acca void for vagueness holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca holding that a conflict of interest on the part of the prosecution violates the due process clause of the virginia constitution holding that lack of notice of charges in disciplinary proceedings violates the due process clause