salary “when used to determine the amount of contributions to be made by the employee, means regular, basic pay,” and that regular pay meant the same thing. Id. at 522, 330 N.W.2d at 474. The statutes that apply to the case at bar use the words “base rate of pay.” There can be no material difference in meaning between “regular, basic pay” and “base rate of pay.” Longevity pay is regular pay, as it would increase only when the fireman receives an increase in pay or every 5 years when the percentage increases. In Hill, the court held that for purposes of retirement contribution and retirement payments, salary does not include such items as overtime pay or holiday pay, because neither contributions toward retirement nor retirement pay itself should depend upon th 362 N.W.2d 848 (1984) (<HOLDING>); Policeman’s Ben. Ass’n v. Fairmont, 437
holding that upon dissolution of partnership of attorneys fees collected for work on cases prior to dissolution should be divided among former partners but fees for work done after dissolution went to individual partner who performed the work holding that a paywhenpaid clause does not preclude a subcontractors recovery under the miller act payment bond because the federal legislation conditions payment of the subcontractor not on payment by the government to the contractor but rather on the passage of time from completion of the work or provision of materials holding that longevity pay was part of salary because it was not a true fringe benefit but rather a normal payment made regularly in the course of the plaintiffs work for regular work done holding that allegations of work reassignment schedule changes increased scrutiny of plaintiffs work and a supervisors stray remarks were insufficient to establish hostile work environment holding that the unambiguous terms of the your work exclusion do not eliminate coverage for harm done to a subcontractors work