by Daubert, 509 U.S. at 590, 113 S.Ct. at 2795, and is ultimately unreliable. In the final analysis, the opinions of Drs. Monroe and Bellanti are based largely on hypothesis and speculation. This is not to say that the doctors are insincere in their opinions, or that their opinions may not some day be validated through scientific research and experiment. It may well be that the AvJet spill forever “sensitized” Ms. Cavallo to petroleum vapors and various other household chemicals. But the published scientific literature and test results simply do not support that conclusion at this time. And the price paid for this seemingly stringent standard of reliability is that, unavoidably, some legitimate injuries will be left unredressed. See Daubert, 509 U.S. at 597, 113 S.Ct. at 2798-99 (<HOLDING>). X. THE BIDANSET STUDIES Dr. Bidanset has a
recognizing the range of discretion of the trial judge holding that the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility given to witness testimony holding that the judge can never direct a verdict of guilty no matter how conclusive the evidence recognizing that in practice a gatekeeping role for the judge no matter how flexible inevitably on occasion will prevent the jury from learning of authentic insights and innovations holding no error was committed when trial court held defense counsel in contempt in front of the jury though it would have been the better practice to reprimand counsel and impose the fine in the absence of the jury