proof on an insanity acquittee at a release hearing did not violate due process. Id. at 1491-92. 30 . See 18 U.S.C. § 4243(b) (providing that prior to the § 4243 hearing, a court-ordered psychiatric or psychological examination of the insanity acquittee shall be completed and a report shall be filed with the court). 31 . See State v. Platt, 143 Wash.2d 242, 19 P.3d 412, 417 (2001) (en banc) ("If the State had the burden of proof, an insanity acquittee could refuse to participate in testing, prevent the State from obtaining critical information about his mental health, and then seek release because the State cannot prove that he is mentally ill.") (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 161, 151 L.Ed.2d 110 (2001). 32 . See, e.g., Williams, 734 F.2d at 1440 (<HOLDING>). 33 . Despite Wattleton's argument to the
recognizing that the states interest in preventing the premature release of individuals who have already proven their dangerousness to society by committing a criminal act outweighs the acquittees interest in avoiding continued confinement recognizing the continued interest of a criminal defendant in frozen property prior to forfeiture holding that the government interest in preventing crime is compelling recognizing the states interest in preventing deception of consumers recognizing the individuals interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters