cert. denied, - U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 687, 126 L.Ed.2d 655 (1994). 2 . The statute, in pertinent part, reads as follows: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State ..., subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 3 . For purposes of the motion, the Court will treat the plaintiff as having a constitutionally protected property interest in his position. See Sanguigni v. Pittsburgh Bd. of Pub. Educ., 968 F.2d 393, 401 (3d Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Most courts in the district, in fact,
holding that a mississippi statute providing that employees could be terminated only for cause establishes a property interest under the fourteenth amendment holding that a public employee who may only be terminated for cause has a property interest in his position that is protected by the 14th amendment holding that any constitutionally protected property interest an employee has as a result of his employment contract is satisfied by payment of the full compensation due under the contract holding driving licenses to be property protected by the 14th amendment holding that contract of employment providing that professor could be terminated only for cause constituted property right protected by fourteenth amendment