(concluding that “[Utah Rule of Civil Procedure] 54(d)(2) does not apply to expenses or attorney fees” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 843 P.2d 1042 (Utah 1992). The majority reasons that if attorney fees are not included, the available award of expenses would be limited to costs of a mere ten dollars and that would be inconsistent with the legislative history. However, either now or in the future, other recoverable expenses may be incurred in bringing an action under the act. Rather than strain the meaning of “expenses” to include attorney fees, it seems better policy to award attorney fees only when so specified by the legislature, court rule, or private agreement. Lastly, to rule that courts can award attorney fees when not specifically authorized by statute, rule, or contra 1977) (<HOLDING>). Because the statute uses the permissive term
holding that federal express costs telephone expenses and postage expenses did not qualify as taxable costs holding that waiver and default are synonymous holding that expenses refers to costs holding that costs and expenses are to considerable degree synonymous holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence