a resident still may be required to designate a homestead, upon request of a creditor, if the person owns more than one property interest to which a homestead exemption might reasonably apply. Id. 3 . A.R.S. § 33-1101(A). 4 . See, e.g., A.R.S. § 32-2101(54)(defining a "subdivision” as "land or lands divided or proposed to be divided for the purpose of sale or lease, whether immediate or future, into six or more lots, parcels or fractional interests”). 5 ."[T]he fundamental purpose of the homestead law is to protect the family against the forced sale of home property from certain creditors, and, to further this purpose, the homestead laws should be interpreted liberally to advance the objectives of the statutes.” Matchav. Winn, 131 Ariz. 115, 117, 638 P.2d 1361, 1363 (App.Div. 1 1981)(<HOLDING>). 6 . "Those entitled to a homestead are named,
holding that the ninth circuit is bound by the california supreme courts interpretation of california law holding that homestead exemption was unavailable even though claimants were  living on the land and claiming it as homestead with the permission or acquiescence of the owner for they could have no homestead right or interest in land to which they had no title holding that the general rule is that temporary absence from the premises will not itself cause an abandonment of the homestead but to retain the homestead exemption one leaving the homestead must in good faith intend to return albeit the intent to return need not be at any particular time in the future holding that a declaration of homestead that omits a recitation that the declarant is an arizona resident is invalid following the reasoning of california case law holding that california law permitted the application of a homestead exemption to property located outside the state