294 N.W.2d at 294. A right is vested when: It has arisen upon a contract, or transaction in the nature of a contract, authorized by statute and liabilities under that right have been so far determined that nothing remains to be done by the party asserting it. Stotts v. Wright County, 478 N.W.2d 802, 805 (Minn.App.1991), quoting.. Jasaka Co., v. City of St. Paul, 309 N.W.2d 40, 44 (Minn.1981) (review denied (Minn. Feb. 11, 1992)). “In zoning cases, the ‘contract’ is the issuance of a building permit, issued in error or later revoked for some reason.” Id. But the doctrine of vested rights exists to protect developers from changes in zoning laws aimed at frustrating development. See Naegele Outdoor Adver. Co. of Minneapolis v. City of Lakeville, 532 N.W.2d 249, 254 (Minn.App.1995) (<HOLDING>), review denied (Minn. July 20, 1995). And “[a]
holding that appellant had waived any objection to an instruction that he had himself introduced and which was amended by the state without objection from appellant holding trial court reversibly erred in not permitting appellant to withdraw his plea where court erroneously stated appellant could appeal motion was in fact not dispositive and appellant was entitled to rely on the courts statement holding that where appellant did not submit permit application until four years after the ordinance in question was amended appellant had no vested rights holding that application of section 9711h as amended did not deprive appellant of any constitutional right holding no jurisdiction where appellant argued report was no report because it failed to mention appellant in any substantive way but trial court found report was merely deficient on element of causation as to appellant and granted extension