the reason for being in custody must be “related to” only the offense. See id. “The statute’s use of the very broad term ‘related to’ instead of, for example, ‘caused by’ or ‘the result of compels the conclusion that his custody can be ‘related to’ both offenses and the statutory credit will nevertheless apply.” Id. The reasons for revocation must be viewed as a whole. If one basis for revocation is the crime for which a defendant is convicted and sentenced, then the time in custody is “related to” that convicted offense. Had Mr. Gater’s parole been revoked solely for the marijuana use, then he would not be entitled to jail-time credit because his time in custody would not be “related to” the current offense. Priester v. Mo. Dep’t of Govr., 119 S.W.3d 140, 141-42 (Mo.App. W.D.2003) (<HOLDING>). Mr. Gater’s parole was revoked for three
holding that counsel was not ineffective in failing to request a charge on the lesserincluded offense when the evidence showed either the commission of the completed offense as charged or the commission of no offense such that the defendant was not entitled to a charge on the lesser offense holding that a defendant is not entitled to credit for time served as a condition of probation holding that where there were two possible grounds to revoke defendants probation and only one ground was relied on to revoke his probation defendant was not entitled to jailtime credit when he was later convicted on the offense that constituted the other ground it did not matter that the authorities learned about the ground for revocation while investigating the offense for which he was convicted sjection 558031 requires only that custody be related to the offense on which credit is sought because his custody was not related to the convicted offense he did not get any credit holding that where jury was instructed on both a greater offense and lesserincluded offense and the jury convicted on the lesserincluded offense the double jeopardy provision prohibited retrial on the greater offense holding that it is sufficient grounds to revoke a probation if only one condition of the probation is broken