or correct an arbitration award upon the application of any party to the arbitration: (a) where there was an evident material miscalculation of figures or an evident material mistake in the description of any person, thing, or property referred to in the award. (b) where the arbitrators have awarded upon a matter not submitted to them, unless it is a matter not affecting the merits of the decision upon the matter submitted. (c) where the award is imperfect in matter of form not affecting the merits of the controversy. 9 U.S.C. § ll(a)-(c). The statutory grounds allowing a trial court to modify an award are limited to those expressly identified above. White, 369 S.W.3d at 916; see also Hall St. Assocs., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576, 586-87, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254 (2008) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, when a trial court modifies an
holding trial court erred in modifying arbitration award to subtract credits holding that the role of the courts is limited to ascertaining whether there exists one of the specific grounds for the vacation of an award as provided in  10 of the arbitration act and that the court should not review the arbitration proceeding for errors of law or fact holding statutory grounds provided in sections 10 and 11 of the faa for vacating modifying or correefing arbitration award are exclusive and cannot be supplemented by contract holding section 10 of faa is procedural and does not preempt state common law holding that the statutory grounds for vacatur and modification of arbitration awards may not be supplemented by contract