in an organization has a legally recognized, distinct identity from that of the organization, putting the lawyer in an agency relationship “sufficiently independent to ensure effective prosecution of claims, thus justifying fees.” Baker, 473 F.3d at 325 (citing Kay, 499 U.S. at 436 n. 7, 111 S.Ct. 1435). The distinction between organizations and individuals is all the more pronounced in the context of a corporation: indeed, it is well settled that “a corporation may appear in the federal courts only through licensed counsel.” Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 201-02, 113 S.Ct. 716, 121 L.Ed.2d 656 (1993) (em its associated with the separation between a company’s rights and their own. See, e.g., United States v. White, 322 U.S. 694, 699, 64 S.Ct. 1248, 88 L.Ed. 1542 (1944) (<HOLDING>); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Issued June 18,
holding that juveniles request to call parent is assertion of fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination holding that fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination is not waived by entry of guilty plea but is relinquished after sentencing is complete holding that defendants exercise of right to testify in own behalf waives his fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination holding that fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination is a purely personal one that cannot be utilized by or on behalf of any organization such as a corporation holding that waiver of privilege against selfincrimination is proceeding specific