at 377; Haight v. Savoy Apartments, 814 S.W.2d 849, 851 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, writ denied). Also, under the “no evidence” motion, after an adequate time for discovery, the party without the burden of proof may, without presenting evidence, move for summary judgment on the ground that there is no evidence to support an essential element of the nonmovant’s claim or defense. Tex.R. Civ. P. 166a(i). The trial court must grant the motion unless the respondent produces summary judgment evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact. The response need only “point out evidence” that raises a fact issue on the challenged elements. Tex.R. Civ. P. 166a cmt (i) to 1997 change; see also Macias v. Fiesta Mart, Inc., 988 S.W.2d 316, 317 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). More than a scintilla of evidence exists when
holding that the nonmoving party must produce more than a scintilla of evidence to survive summary judgment holding that summary judgment was appropriate when no reasonable factfinder could have found for the nonmovant recognizing that a noevidence summary judgment is improper if the nonmovant brings forth more than a scintilla of evidence holding courts review motion for summary judgment in light most favorable to nonmovant holding that on a motion for summary judgment the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the plaintiffs position will be insufficient and there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff