between- the lessee and the contractor voidable at the option of the contractor. The interest of the lessor shall not he subject to liens for improvements made by the lessee when: (1) The lease or a short form thereof is recorded in the clerk’s office and the terms of the lease expressly prohibit such liability; or (2) All of the leases entered into by a lessor for the rental of premises on a parcel of land prohibit such liability and a notice which sets forth the following is recorded by the lessor in the public records of the county in which the parcel of land is located: (a) The name of the lessor. (b) The legal description of the parcel of land to which the notice applies. (c) The specific language contained in the various leases p ncy, Inc., 309 So.2d 219, 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975) (<HOLDING>); Tom Joyce Realty Corp. v. Popkin, 111 So.2d
holding that the lease pro vision granting the lessee the option of constructing improvements did not make the construction the pith of the lease holding that the appellant contractor failed to prove the existence of a lease provision requiring the lessee to make the improvements at issue which could have the effect of subjecting the lessors property to a lien holding that a lessors interest can only be subject to liens arising from improvements performed on the leased property if the lease required the improvements or if under judicial interpretation the improvements were the pith of the lease holding that the lessors interest in the leased property was subject to liens because it was perfectly obvious that the parties knew that the improvements at issue were the pith of the lease and that except for them the lease would not have been executed and because the improvements were essential to the purpose of the lease holding that the lease at issue which set forth that the tenant may at its own expense make alterations and improvements did not require the lessee to make the improvements and that the alterations and improvements did not constitute the pith of the lease