the appropriate law to be Utilized to evaluate whether the attorney:client privilege is waived. CONCLUSION [¶ 42.] We reverse and remand for findings as to whether Twin City injected, by an affirmative act, its reliance upon the advice of counsel into the bad faith litigation thereby making the disputed communications relevant to the case such that would constitute an implied waiver of the attorney-client privilege. See Bertelsen, 2011 S.D. 13, ¶ 53, 796 N.W.2d at 703. If the circuit court finds that Twin City im pliedly waived the attorney-client privilege by injecting the advice of counsel into the bad faith litigation, then the court must conduct an in camera review to determine and make findings as to the extent that the attorney-client communications should be revealed. See id. (<HOLDING>). Regarding the claim of complete delegation,
holding that juveniles may waive right to counsel only upon advice of counsel recognizing implicit waiver of the attorney client privilege where the plaintiff has placed in issue a communication which goes to the heart of the claim in controversy holding that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel waives attorneyclient privilege holding that a client only waives the privilege to the extent necessary to reveal the advice of counsel he placed at issue holding that an invocation of the advice of counsel defense waives the attorneyclient privilege