a passenger has a heart attack can be an accident if it “contravenes the airline’s established customs,, rules or procedures”); Husain v. Olympic Airways, 116 F.Supp.2d 1121, 1134-35 (N.D.Cal. 2000) (failing to allow an asthmatic passenger to move away from cigarette smoke, in contravention of industry standards and airline policies, is an accident). Thus, the Blansetts argue that even if merely sitting does not constitute an accident, failing to warn of the dangers of merely sitting can constitute an accident if the failure violates “accepted procedures and rules.” See Husain, 116 F.Supp.2d at 1134. In response, Continental argues that it did not have a duty to warn passengers of the risk of developing DVT. See Sprayregen v. American Airlines, Inc., 570 F.Supp. 16, 17 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (<HOLDING>). Similarly, Continental argues that its
holding that the airline had no duty to warn passengers of the potential hazards of flying with a head cold holding that an organization had no duty to warn of potential danger from sexual abuse of one of its volunteers where injured child was not associated with organizations programs holding a duty to warn arises only when the potential victim is known and foreseeable holding that no duty to warn exists when hazards are known through general knowledge holding that the court had no duty to warn defendants about the possibility of deportation as a collateral consequence of conviction