represents a constitutional policy of finality for the defendant’s benefit in criminal proceedings.” (Stevens, J., concurring)). ¶7 The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees, “[n]o person shall be . . . subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb.” Article I, section 9 of the Washington Constitution states, “[n]o person shall... be twice put in jeopardy for the same offense.” Both clauses have consistent analytical interpretations. State v. Gocken, 127 Wn.2d 95, 102-03, 896 P.2d 1267 (1995). ¶8 The double jeopardy clause bars retrial where jeopardy has previously attached, and has terminated, and the defendant is in jeopardy a second time for the same offense in fact and law. State v. Ervin, 158 Wn.2d 746, 752, 147 P.3d 567 (2006) (<HOLDING>). Jeopardy may be terminated by acquittal,
holding that where a conviction is reversed after trial the double jeopardy clause does not bar a government appeal that if successful would only reinstate the conviction and would not subject defendant to a second trial holding that the entire sentencing plan must be reevaluated in instances in which a defendant successfully challenges one of several interdependent sentences holding that the government may appeal a postverdict ruling without violating double jeopardy where the appeal does not result in a new trial holding that the obligation does not terminate upon death holding where a defendant successfully challenges a conviction on appeal jeopardy does not terminate