marks omitted); see also, e.g., Immigration & Naturalization Serv. v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210, 217, 104 S.Ct. 1758, 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984) (investigative detention - requires “some minimal level of pbjective justification”); Robinson v. United States, 76 A.3d 329, 336 (D.C. 2013) (“The reasonable, articulable suspicion standard requires substantially less than probable cause and considerably less than proof of wrongdoing by a preponderance of the. evidence. It is not onerous, but it is not toothless either .... Unparticu-larized suspicion and inarticulate hunches are not sufficient ....”) (citations and internal quotation-marks omitted). Courts consider a number of factors in determining whether officers had reasonable articu-lable suspicion to stop a suspect, including a report o 14) (<HOLDING>). B. Mr. Wade also argues that even if the
holding that police officers had probable cause to arrest a suspect where the facts suggest a fair probability that the suspect has committed a crime recognizing that police officer may stop a suspect if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot holding that no seizure occurred where officer approached the suspect at the bus stop mentioned that he was investigating a bank robbery asked the suspect what he was doing in the area and for his identification and otherwise gave no indication that the suspect was not free to leave or to refuse to respond to questioning holding that stop of suspect was supported by reasonable articulable suspicion where anonymous 911 caller described man with a gun officers saw suspect walking with man who matched description provided by 911 caller suspect made nervous and evasive motions incident occurred in highcrime area and suspect attempted to flee holding that stop of appellant was supported by reasonable articulable suspicion where anonymous 911 caller said that she had seen suspect pull gun out of his pocket 911 caller described suspect and suspects location responding officer located appellant near stated location appellant matched description and no one else in vicinity matched description