CURIAM. Russell Chambers appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for contempt by Ronald Rosenberg. Chambers contends that Rosenberg’s actions violated an agreed temporary injunction and an agreed final judgment and permanent injunction. The trial court held that the temporary injunction was void ab initio because no bond was executed. The court found that the final judgment was vague, ambiguous, overly broad, and unenforceable, but did not find it void; the court simply denied the motion for contempt. We will affirm the order of the trial court. We cannot review the denial of the motion for contempt of the agreed final d 303, 308 (1956) (<HOLDING>); see also Ex parte Jordan, 787 S.W.2d 367, 368
recognizing that no bond or a nominal bond may be appropriate in cases involving the public interest holding that even though a bond contained provisions not required by statute it must be considered statutory and not common law because the bond did not expand the payment provisions beyond those stated in statute holding that taxable costs included only the premium on a surety bond posted on appeal not the fees paid for letters of credit to secure the bond where the state statute and court rule only specifically allowed for premium on any surety bond holding that the bond was intended to and did substantially comply with sjection 71323 therefore because its conditions were not broader and more protective than the statute required the contention that the bond was a common law bond failed holding that bond provisions of rule 684 are manda tory and that an injunction issued without a bond is void