641 P.2d 501, 502 (1982) (interpreting word “any” in named driver exclusion to mean “without limit”). The word “claim” means “a demand for compensation, benefits or payment.” Webster’s Third New International Dictionary 414 (unabr. ed.2002). See generally Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Farmland Mut. Ins. Co., 568 N.W.2d 815, 818 (Iowa 1997) (stating that in searching for the ordinary meaning of a policy term, “we often look to dictionaries”). Giving the words in the contract their ordinary meaning, we think the first sentence of the named driver exclusion clearly encompasses the UIM claim asserted by Scott, unless other provisions in the policy give rise to an ambiguity. See Progressive N. Ins. Co. v. Schneck, 572 Pa. 216, 813 A.2d 828, 831 (2002) (<HOLDING>); cf. Nelson v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 162
holding nearly identical named driver exclusion was plain and unambiguous and excluded claim brought under um coverage holding nearly identical exclusion did not violate public policy noting there is no clear legislative pronouncement of public policy requiring umuim coverage for a named driver exclusion holding that recovery from the tortfeasors insurer is a condition precedent to a claim for uim benefits holding nearly identical exclusion of  any claim  unambiguously operates to bar recovery of uim benefits under policy when driver is excluded holding second sentence of a nearly identical exclusion did not limit the scope of the exclusion