unilateral contract and the JCC’s ruling was correct. We agree with Appellant and reverse. As stipulated by the parties, the relevant facts are that Appellant’s representative interviewed Hawley in Missouri. Hawley never came to Florida. He responded to an ad in a Missouri newspaper designed to recruit Admissions Representatives to recruit Missouri residents to attend Appellant’s college in Florida. Haw promises. Thus, the agreement is a bilateral contract, and Chapte awley was executed in Florida. A contract is created where the last act necessary to make a binding agreement takes place. See Peters v. E.O. Painter Fertilizer Co., 73 Fla. 1001, 75 So. 749, 750 (1917); see also Ray-Hof Agencies, Inc. v. Petersen, 123 So.2d 251, 253 (Fla.1960); Goodman v. Olsen, 305 So.2d 753 (Fla.1974) (<HOLDING>). Where one contracting party signs the
holding that for purposes of longarm jurisdiction because plaintiff was employed in new york the original event causing his injury occurred in new york holding jurisdiction over nonresident defendant existed where note was payable in new york contained new york choice of law clause and proceeds were used to finance new york limited partnership holding that new york law applies to this matter holding that contract signed in new york by promisor from florida and partially performed in florida was governed by new york law because it was executed in new york holding that outofstate defendants transmittal into new york of ceaseanddesist letter to new york plaintiff for purported trademark infringement was insufficient to create jurisdiction over defendant in a new york declaratory judgment action