than the figure of $593,584.50 listed as a transfer of property to Rubicon made within two years prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. These charts reflect this de minimus error. 8 . This Court also finds that Crestview is a controlling shareholder. However, for reasons discussed later in this Memorandum Opinion, the Court concludes that it may designate only one of these corporations to be the Debtor's representative under Bankruptcy Rule 9001(5). This Court has decided to designate Rubicon for the reasons discussed infra, Part V. 9 . Hereafter, the use of the word "person” or "persons” (when expressly in quotations) means that this Court is using this word as it is defined in 11 U.S.C. § 101(41). 10 . See, e.g., Leibert v. Grinnell Corp., 194 A.2d 846, 850 (Del.Ch.1963) (<HOLDING>). 11 . The District Court also noted that,
recognizing a cause of action against a corporations directors brought by a creditor for the fraudulent misrepresentation of the corporations financial condition holding that while a state statute granted a foreign corporation the rights and privileges enjoyed by domestic corporations it did not transform such corporations into domestic or resident corporations holding that the situs of an acquired missouri corporation was not determinative of choiceoflaw question as to finders fee contract between a finder and a purchaser both nonmissouri corporations holding that securities of other corporations may of course be acquired by a delaware corporation holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation