Saucy Sisters’ implied covenant claim to the jury, we reverse the judgment against United. Our disposition makes it unnecessary to consider any other arguments raised on appeal or cross-appeal. III. CONCLUSION We AFFIRM the trial court’s order granting United summary judgment on Saucy Sisters’ breach of contract claim, but REVERSE its order denying United summary judgment on the implied covenant claim. Accordingly, we VACATE the judgment and REMAND for entry of judgment in favor of United. 1 . Section 22 of the Agreement provided that "any dispute arising under or in connection with this Agreement, including any action in tort, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Illinois.” 2 . See West v. City of St. Paul, 936 P.2d 136, d 980, 137 Ill.Dec. 494, 546 N.E.2d 248, 256 (1989) (<HOLDING>). 17 . Harrison, 137 Ill.Dec. 494, 546 N.E.2d
holding that if the implied obligation to deal in good faith were allowed to create a cause of action in an employmentatwill situation it would eviscerate the at will doctrine altogether holding damages for emotional distress are not recoverable in an action for breach of contract whether express or implied in the absence of a showing that the parties contemplated such damages at the time the contract was made holding that the plaintiffs express atwill agreement precluded the existence of an implied contract requiring good cause for termination holding that plaintiffs express contract with the surety company precludes an implied contract with defendant holding that putting implied restrictions on an employmentatwill contract would be inconsistent with the express terms of the contract which allowed for termination at any time