is a substantial probability that he will attain that capacity in the foreseeable future,” Jackson, 406 U.S. at 738, 92 S.Ct. 1845. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: (1) A guardian ad litem will be appointed for defendant Kevin L. King. (2) The Bureau of Prisons’ request to commit defendant King for an additional period of time (doc. no. 62) will be set for an additional hearing where the court will hear from defendant King’s guardian ad litem as to whether defendant King waives the statutory four-month limit under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d). * The court draws no conclusion, however, as to the waivability of the constitutional reasonableness limit under the due process clause that § 4241(d) aims to protect. See Jackson v. Indiana, 406 U.S. 715, 738, 92 S.Ct. 1845, 32 L.Ed.2d 435 (1972) (<HOLDING>); Do-nofrio, 896 F.2d at 1303 ("The due process
holding that the time to disposition is more important than time to trial holding that a criminal defendant committed solely on account of his incapacity to proceed to trial cannot be held more than the reasonable amount of time necessary to determine whether there is a substantial probability that he will attain that capacity in the foreseeable future holding that an alien may be held in confinement until it has been determined that there is no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future holding that the ins lacks authority under  1231a6 to detain a resident alien for more than a reasonable time beyond the removal period if there is no reasonable likelihood that the alien will be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future holding that the purpose of a preliminary examination is to determine whether there is probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and whether there is probable cause to believe that the defendant committed it