ruling, the juvenile court again inquired i#f Trial Counsel had anything to. add. Trial Counsel responded that he did not. Once the juvenile court turned to the scheduling of a review hearing, Trial Counsel inquired, "Your honor, am I released?" In response, the State indicated that Trial Counsel would likely need to continue to represent Mother through the possible initiation of an appeal, but the juvenile court released Trial Counsel from attending the review hearing. Mother now appeals the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights to A.S. and 8.84. ISSUE AND STANDARD OF REVIEW 120 Mother argues fhat Trial Counsel failed to provide her .with the effective assistance of counsel to which she was enti tled. See State in Interest of E.H., 880 P.2d 11, 13 (Utah Ct.App.1994) (<HOLDING>). "An ineffective assistance of counsel claim
recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel holding that a parents statutory right to counsel in termination proceedings guarantees the right to effective counsel holding that the due process clause of the alaska constitution guarantees the right to effective counsel in proceedings for the termination of parental rights recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees the right to effective assistance of counsel