that any sentence that reasonably reflected the gravity of the petitioner’s offense would have serious consequences for the petitioner. The Court specifically recommended to the Bureau of Prisons that the petitioner be designated to the Federal Medical Center at Fort Devens, Massachusetts, although the petitioner appears to be incarcerated at another facility and has received treatment at a local hospital. The petitioner argues that this strengthens his claim that the incarceration at the MCC was unusually burdensome on him and that his attorney should have made that argument. For the reasons explained above, that is not a viable basis to grant the petition. The motion can also be read as a request to the Court to reduce his sentence because of his current medical condit h Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). On the other hand, the Bureau of Prisons does
holding the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal where the circuit court had the power to remand the agency decision for further proceedings holding that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because it was filed without proper authority holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to hear defendants motion for reduction under section 3582c1a because the director of the bureau of prisons had not brought motion holding court lacked jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity by defendants who were not public officials holding in pertinent part that this court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal