And these arrests aren’t distant arrests. These arrests occur while out on bond in this case. [T]he Sidney Norvil that is committing crimes is the Sidney Norvil that’s running around with his friends breaking into people’s cars — breaking into people’s houses. The trial court declined to sentence the defendant as a youthful offender, and instead sentenced him to twelve years in prison. The defendant argues that the trial court violated his due process rights during sentencing by improperly considering new charges pending against him. He seeks a reversal of his sentence and remand for resentencing before a different judge. “Generally, the trial court’s imposition of a sentence that is within the minimum and m DCA 1986) (same); Nawaz v. State, 28 So.3d 122, 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (<HOLDING>). A de novo standard of review applies to a
holding resentencing is not always required holding that the trial courts apparent consideration of the defendants national origin during sentencing amounted to a due process violation and required resentencing by a different judge holding that consideration of pending or dismissed charges during sentencing results in a denial of the defendants due process rights holding that the sentencing judge could consider the defendants subsequent arrest even though the charges were dismissed during sentencing holding that resentencing is required