often simply shipped replacement modules from its open inventory to Google. This was possible because rather than being manufactured specifically for Google, the modules were mass-produced standardized product that the Debtor sold to many customers. California law, the language of the Terms and Conditions, and the parties’ course of dealings are all consistent with the Debtor’s contention that title to the modules passed back to it when Google returned them and are inconsistent with Google’s assertion that it , 443 F.2d 611, 613 (5th Cir.1971) (concluding that installation by the buyer of heavy equipment supplied by the seller is an act inconsistent with the seller’s ownership precluding rejection); Marbelite Co. v. City of Philadelphia, 208 Pa.Super. 256, 222 A.2d 443, 444 (1966) (<HOLDING>); Park Cty. Implement Co. v. Craig, 397 P.2d
holding that use of traffic signal equipment was inconsistent with sellers ownership and constituted acceptance holding that allowing moderate use of the resources on the property was not inconsistent with exclusive use holding that complete performance of contract constituted acceptance holding that buyers retention and use of boiler was an act inconsistent with sellers ownership and constituted acceptance precluding rejection holding that although sellers acknowledgment was not valid acceptance of buyers offer under  22071 buyers subsequent acceptance of and payment for goods along with buyers objection to a particular term within counteroffer constituted assent to remaining terms of counteroffer