the instant case, it is undisputed -that the statement State Farm received for Mariners Hospital’s medical services did not comply with - section 627.736(5)(d).-Specifically, the statement was not submitted on one of the required forms and did not identify each medical procedure by the Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology. Section 627.736(5)(d) specifically provides that “[a]ll statements and bills for medical services rendered by any ... hospital ... shall be submitted to the insurer on a Health Care Finance Administration 1500 form, UB 92 forms, or any other standard form approved by the department for purposes of this billing. All billings, for such services shall, to the extent applicable, follow the Physicians’ Current Procedural Terminology_” See Pressley, 28 So.3d at 108 (<HOLDING>). Although section 627.786(4)(b) provides that
holding that when the trial court proceeded to consider affidavits submitted with motion to reconsider summary judgment the affidavits were properly before the appellate court for purposes of reviewing the propriety of the trial courts grant of summary judgment holding that trial court erred in denying motion for judgment of acquittal when state failed to prove venue holding that the trial court erred in denying state farms motion for summary judgment because the medical providers bills were not submitted on the forms required by section 6277365d and therefore no pip benefits were overdue holding that in ruling on a motion for summary judgment the trial court is limited to the grounds raised in the motion holding trial court erred in denying defendants motion for arrest of judgment where indictment was insufficient