vetoed. We take no position on this matter, but note only that Petitioners’ challenge to Section 1506 as originally enacted will be addressed for this reason. 17 . Respondents have asserted that Section 1506 reflects the Legislature's intent to preempt local zoning regulations. We agree that Section 1506 clearly reflects the legislative intent to override local zoning and land use provisions to the extent that a licensed facility has been approved by the Board. See Olon v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Dep’t of Corrections, 534 Pa. 90, 626 A.2d 533 (1993) (finding that the General Assembly overrode local zoning ordinances that prohibited use of property for correctional facility); Commonwealth, Dep’t of General Services v. Ogontz Area Neighbors Ass’n., 505 Pa. 614, 483 A.2d 448 (1984) (<HOLDING>). Such inquiry is separate, however, from the
holding that in the limited circumstances when local zoning authorities actions prohibit personal wireless service the act preempts local zoning law holding that zoning restrictions on private airfield operations are not preempted recognizing that zoning and rezoning are legislative matters holding that the state police is a state agency holding a state agency is subject to local zoning restrictions absent legislative direction to the contrary