Tentative map and supporting documents [was] preempted" by the Copyright Act. Id. 28 . Wedgwood, 601 F.Supp. at 1535. In Wedg wood an artist alleged that a pottery company wrongfully misappropriated "her time, talent,] and effort" by copying her design. Id. at 1526, 1535. The district court determined that the artist's claim sounded in misappropriation because she sought to protect against the company's "competing use of a valuable product or idea [she had] created ... through investment of time, effort, money{,] and expertise." Id. at 1534 (citation omitted). Concluding under the preemption analysis's first prong that the design fell "within the subject matter of the copyright laws," id. at 1532, the court then analyzed whether the artist's misapprop d 688, 691-92, 712-14 (D.Md.2001) (<HOLDING>); Deo v. Gilbert, No. 260847, 2005 WL 2323808,
holding copyright act preempted photographers misappropriation claim when claim did not have extra element such as breach of fiduciary duty holding in suit between sellers of historic photographs copyright act preempted state law claim based on right to exclusive reproduction of photographs holding that even if utah law recognized tort of misappropriation such a claim would be preempted by copyright act holding misappropriation claim by real estate information service provider against website using services photographs was preempted by copyright act because claim had no extra element holding that conversion and unjust enrichment claims were preempted by the copyright act since they were not qualitatively different from a copyright claim because they contained no extra element beyond those necessary to show copyright infringement