support this interpretation. Nevada attorneys must notify their clients in writing of any interest the attorney has that is adverse to a client. RPC 1.8(a); In re Singer, 109 Nev. 1117, 1118, 865 P.2d 315, 315 (1993). Other courts have found that charging liens constitute adverse interests and applied a similar written notice rule. See Fletc rm waived its right to assert its charging lien when it waited several months after the property was distributed to assert its charging lien). See also Anderson v. Farmers Coop. Elevator Ass’n, Inc., 874 F. Supp. 989, 992 (D. Neb. 1995) (quashing the attorney charging lien because notice of the lien was untimely, made after the property had been transferred to the opposing party); Libner v. Maine Cnty. Comm’rs Ass’n, 845 A.2d 570, 573 (Me. 2004) (<HOLDING>). It would be unreasonable and unfair to
holding that the attorneys charging lien may be asserted and enforced in the civil action which gave rise to the lien claim or in an independent action holding the beginning of a creditors action to subject an equitable estate to the payment of a judgment gives a specific lien upon the property which it is sought to reach and this lien continues while the cause is pending holding state courts authority under iowa code section 59821 not the lien created there under prevented debtor from claiming the iowa homestead exemption and therefore the debtor could not avoid the lien because the lien did not impair an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled but for the lien holding that the lien bond releases the property from the lien but the lien is then secured by the bond holding that no lien may be imposed without direct and specific notice to the fund of an opposing party or its carriers that a lien is asserted before the proceeds are disbursed