of our federal and state constitutions. The Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution prohibits states from “de-priv[ing] any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” U.S. Const, amend. XIV, § 1. The Iowa Constitution contains similar language stating “no person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” Iowa Const, art. I, § 9. In many instances we have deemed the federal and state due process and equal protection clauses to be identical in scope, import, and purpose. In re C.P., 569 N.W.2d 810, 811 (Iowa 1997). However, it is the exclusive prerogative of our court to determine the constitutionality of Iowa statutes challenged under our own constitution. Putensen v. Hawkeye Bank, 564 N.W.2d 404, 408 (Iowa 1997) (<HOLDING>). Although we may look upon the United States
holding nonjudicial foreclosure did not involve sufficient state action to trigger iowa constitutions due process clause holding that foreclosure on mortgage not state action and thus could not trigger due process clause scrutiny recognizing that plaintiff can bring action under due process clause of state constitution holding that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the acca violates the constitutions guarantee of due process holding statute denying putative father standing to bring legitimation action under statute in effect at the time did not violate due process or equal protection of state or federal constitutions