institution for an aggregate period of one hundred eighty days or more.” 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f)(7). The Attorney General may also decide that, “for other reasons,” the alien has failed to establish good moral character. 8 U.S.C. § 1101(f). Section 1255(i)(l)(B)(i) permits aliens who are beneficiaries (or spouses or children of beneficiaries) of approved immigrant visa petitions that were filed before April 30, 2001, to apply for adjustment of status to that of a lawfully admitted alien. The Government contends that under § 1252(a)(2)(B), we may not review any order granting or denying §§ 1229b and 1255 relief, regardless of whether relief was denied as a matter of discretion or because a nondiscretionary factor was found to preclude eligibility for relief. We disagree. Mindful of ir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Other circuits have also found that the same
holding that a determination regarding whether an alien met the continual physical presence requirement of  1229b was nondiscretionary and thus reviewable holding that the decision whether an alien meets the hardship requirement in 8 usc  1229b is  a discretionary judgment holding that a determination that precluded an alien from even applying for relief under section 1255 is a purely legal question that is reviewable holding that an aliens continuous physical presence is broken if the alien was offered and accepted the opportunity to withdraw an application for admission holding that whether an alien satisfies the continuous presence requirement of 8 usc  1229b is a nondiscretionary determination because it involves straightforward statutory interpretation and application of law to fact and is therefore reviewable