provided therein. Oil, Inc., 197 W.Va. 55, 62, 475 S.E.2d 55, 62 (1996) (observing that “Appellant’s failure to appeal the final judgment order entered by the circuit court brought finality to that judgment, thereby ending any controversy or adverseness between the parties”); Ward v. Ward’s Heirs, 50 W.Va. 517, 519, 40 S.E. 472, 473 (1901) (“ ‘Where a party by his acts or express agreement releases appealable error, he waives all right of appeal’”) (quoting 2 Ency. Pl. & Prac. 174, note; 7 Ency. Pl. & Prac. 870). Given the clear failure of the State to challenge the underlying payment orders through means of an appeal, we cannot entertain any non-jurisdictional based challenges to those orders at this time. See Whitlow v. Board of Educ., 190 W.Va. 223, 226, 438 S.E.2d 15, 18 (1993) (<HOLDING>). While we find no impediment to enforcement of
recognizing general rule that failure to raise nonjurisdietional issues below precludes appellate consideration of such issues holding failure to preserve issues below results in waiver even of constitutional issues recognizing general rule recognizing general rule that an appellate court cannot address claims that were not raised below holding that   1252d1 bars the consideration of bases for relief that were not raised below and of general issues that were not raised below but not of specific subsidiary legal arguments or arguments by extension that were not made below