Husband argues that:. (1) the trial court violated Former Husband’s due process rights by involuntarily dismissing the petition before he had finished presenting his ease; and (2) the trial court erred in dismissing the entire petition based on Former Husband’s inability to establish only one of the listed grounds for modification. We agree with both arguments. Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(b) governs the involuntary dismissal of actions and provides in pertinent part: After a party seeking affirmative relief in an action tried by the court without a jury has completed the presentation of evidence, any other pa DCA 2001) (“[A]n involuntary dismissal may not be entered before the plaintiff has completed the pres Title Ins. Co. of Pa., 668 So.2d 658, 658 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>). Here, before his case was dismissed, Former
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it dismissed the case without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to properly serve the defendant within 120 days after filing the complaint holding that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation because there was no evidence that the decisionmaker knew of the plaintiffs protected conduct holding that the trial court properly dismissed the entire multicount complaint because the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case as to any of the counts holding that plaintiff could not establish prima facie case of discrimination where plaintiff failed to meet minimum qualifications for job holding to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination a plaintiff must show he 1