of any trade or commerce); see also, Galstaldi v. Sunvest Cmtys. USA, LLC, 637 F.Supp.2d 1045, 1057 (S.D.Fla.2009) (§ 501.211(1) “is broadly worded to authorize declaratory and injunction relief even if those remedies might not benefit the individual consumers who filed the suit. The FDUTPA is ‘designed to protect not only the rights of litigants, but also the rights of the consuming public at large.’” (internal citations omitted)). C. Florida’s Litigation Privilege The Palmer Law Firm contends that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred in blanket fashion by the litigation privilege. In Florida, the litigation privilege “essentially provides] legal immunity for actions that occur in judicial proceedings.” Echevarria, McCalla, Raymer, Barrett & Frappier v. Cole, 950 So.2d 380, 383 (Fla.2007) (<HOLDING>). The Florida Supreme Court explained the
holding that the codification of the attorneyclient privilege embodies the commonlaw rule holding that the litigation privilege was not reserved for common law tort actions but applied across the board  to commonlaw causes of action those initiated pursuant to a statute or of some other origin recognizing the tort of breach of physicianpatient privilege holding that the owner of a patent or common law easement across national forest lands had to apply for a special use permit recognizing commonlaw privilege against selfincrimination