See id. “[W]here a party’s constitutional rights may be abridged by the continuance of ... proceedings” relating to grandparent visitation, certiorari review should be granted. Belair v. Drew, 770 So.2d 1164, 1166 (Fla.2000). B. Grandparent Visitation Although the trial court’s orders did not expressly mandate visitation, the predicate for the orders is that the grandparents are entitled to visitation. The order appointing the parental coordinator states that the purpose for the coordinator is to “make recommendations relative to visitation of the children with the maternal grandparents” and to “[ajssist the holding facially unconstitutional provision of section 752.01(1) relating to visitation where child was born out of wedlock); Von Eiff v. Azicri, 720 So.2d 510, 517 (Fla.1998) (<HOLDING>); Beagle v. Beagle, 678 So.2d 1271, 1276
holding visitation statute unconstitutional because it disregards presumption favoring parental decisionmaking forcing parents to prove visitation not in childs best interest holding facially unconstitutional provision in 1993 version of section 75201 which provided for visitation where one or both parents of a child were deceased holding unconstitutional a prior version of rc 231521 which provided that the court not the jury would determine the amount of punitive or exemplary damages holding conclusory statements in visitation dispute were not adequate to support awarding visitation rights holding section 61132b2c facially unconstitutional