firearm that has the ability to fire many rounds without reloading,” because “a magazine or similar device that could accept more than 15 rounds of ammunition” was attached or in close proximity to the firearm at the time of the offense. USSG § 2K2.1, comment, (n.2). Barron does not dispute that the district court properly applied the guideline to his conduct, and the guideline itself is a proper exercise of the Sentencing Commission’s authority. Although Congress repealed its ban on possession of semiautomatic assault weapons, the Commission’s decision to recommend enhanced punishment for prohibited persons who possess such weapons does not conflict with any statute, and the guideline is therefore valid. Cf. United States v. Whitehead, 425 F.3d 870, 871-72 (10th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Barron argues, however, that the district
holding that a defective acknowledgment does not affect the validity of a mortgage as to the parties holding that constitutional provision which prohibited local and special laws did not limit legislatures inherent power to repeal the corporate privileges of a particular community and therefore act which repealed the charter of the city of memphis was not unconstitutional holding that shepard did not affect the continuing validity of almendareztorres holding that the repeal of  921a30 did not affect the validity of the prior version of  2k21a4b which continued to reference the repealed  921a30 recognizing that in 1998 the legislature repealed a previous version of the statute and enacted two statutes in replacement