seeking another award in 1996 for a scheduled loss under Code § 65.2-503(B). In 1992, Dr. Worland had opined that Childress would not further improve in her ability to use her left and right legs. The commission noted that Gunst joined in a memorandum of agreement establishing Childress’ ratable permanency. In accordance with that agreement, the commission entered an award in 1993 granting Childress permanent partial loss of use benefits based upon “50% loss of use of [her] legs.” The commission’s award was a tacit finding and acknowledgement of Gunst’s agreément that Childress had reached maximum medical improvement. See Code § 65.2-706 (“The award, of the Commission ... shall be conclusive and binding as to all questions of fact.”); see also Hart, 218 Va. at 568, 238 S.E.2d at 815 (<HOLDING>). The commission’s finding that Childress had
holding that the injury was not inflicted by the defendant when it may have resulted from the actions ie the headbutt of the victim himself holding that a notice of claim period did not begin to run until discovery of the injury holding that the benefit provided by code  652503 is not awardable until the injury has reached a state of permanency ie maximum improvement  holding that an injury is not within the scope of employment after the employee has left work unless the injury was caused by the employers negligence holding in a legal malpractice case the statute of limitations is not triggered by a potential injury until the underlying lawsuit is resolved