the prison law library did not have the AEDPA materials available until 1998. At the time the district court denied Queen’s federal petition, the court did not have the benefit of our decision in Laws. Id. at 923-24 (reversing and remanding for further development of the record where petitioner alleged that his delay in filing a timely federal habeas petition was caused by his diminished mental capacity). Accordingly, we vacate the district court’s determination that Queen is not entitled to equitable tolling based on both his mental health and his allegation of a lack of materials at the prison library, and remand so the district court may make a determination after further development of the record. See Whalem/Hunt v. Early, 233 F.3d 1146, 1148 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). VACATED AND REMANDED. ** This disposition is
recognizing that determinations of whether there are grounds for equitable tolling are highly fact dependent holding that credibility determinations are for the jury holding that the 120day filing period is subject to equitable tolling and addressing circumstances warranting equitable tolling holding that when regulations are intended to have different purposes and are not dependent on each other they are not intertwined holding that the determination of equitable tolling is  highly fact dependent  and may involve the confluence of numerous factors beyond the prisoners control