App. 898, 901 (3) (b), 904 (6) (611 SE2d 129) (2005) (affirming the trial court’s finding that there was insufficient probable cause for a DUI arrest even when the defendant admitted that she had been drinking alcohol, and reiterating that “evidence which shows only that the defendant had alcohol in her body while driving provides insufficient probable cause to arrest for DUI” (emphasis in original)). 14 Bostic, 332 Ga. App. at 607; accord Handley, 294 Ga. App. at 237-38; Ellison, 271 Ga. App. at 902 (3) (b). 15 Ellison, 271 Ga. App. at 901 (3) (a); accord Sanders, 274 Ga. App. at 397; see also State v. Young, 334 Ga. App. 161, 163 (778 SE2d 402) (2015) (“[A] trial court is not obligated to believe a witness even if that witness’s testimony is uncontradic ostic, 332 Ga. App. at 607-08 (<HOLDING>); State v. Damato, 302 Ga. App. 181, 183 (1)
recognizing that the necessary inquiry  is not whether there was a warrant or whether there was time to get one but whether there was probable cause for the arrest holding that there was probable cause to arrest defendant for dui where among other factors the officer observed defendant driving erratically and defendants eyes were glassy holding that there was sufficient probable cause for the defendants dui arrest when the evidence showed that the officer smelled the odor of alcohol on the defendants breath the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery and his breath test was positive for alcohol holding that the trial court was authorized to conclude that probable cause supported an arrest for dui when evidence showed that the officer detected the odor of alcohol coming from the defendants vehicle the defendant admitted to having consumed alcohol her breath tested positive for the presence of alcohol her speech was slurred and her eyes were red and watery and she failed the oneleg stand field sobriety test holding that there was insufficient probable cause for a dui arrest when inter alia there was testimony that the defendants eyes were bloodshot and watery