he is subject to any and all searches that the arresting officer may wish to conduct.” Mills, 472 F.2d at 1284. Different circumstances will give rise to different searches and seizures, some searches and seizures being reasonable in one circumstance and not in others; but reasonableness under the circumstances is the cornerstone. Thus, a search may be supported by probable cause, but may be conducted in a manner making it so unreasonable as to require a finding of unconstitutionality. See Schmerber, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826 (where the United States Supreme Court first analyzed whether the search was supported by probable cause and then determined whether the search (a blood test) was conducted in a reasonable manner); see also Campbell v. Miller, 499 F.3d 711, 718 (7th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). In any event, we recognize that “[s]trip
recognizing that notion exercise of any discretion renders search unreasonable per se has been rejected holding that vehicular search incident to arrest for traffic offense is unreasonable under state constitution holding that while search incident to arrest could not justify search in that case probable cause plus exigency justified search holding that strip search incident to arrest was not per se unreasonable but holding that search was performed in an unreasonable manner when conducted in view of the public holding search unreasonable when conducted on the highway in broad day light