law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 1 . In his opening brief, the defendant disputes that the video shows a clear image of the individual in the patch on November 3, 1999, and claims the video tape only shows the individual looking at a plant and pulling something up and tossing it away, not examining the plants or using clippers. We do not address these claims, however, because the defendant neither disputed the video tape evidence in his motion to suppress before the district court, nor included the video tape in the record on appeal. See United States v. Vasquez, 985 F.2d 491, 494 (10th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Walker v. Mather (In re Walker), 959 F.2d
holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it   holding that when an appellant fails to offer an argument on an issue that issue is abandoned holding issue not properly before the appellate court where appellant fails to demonstrate where in the record an issue was raised in the district court holding court unable to rule on issue when the record fails to include copies of the evidence needed to decide issue on appeal holding that if the record discloses evidence needed to decide the issue of iac and that issue was raised by assignment of error on appeal it can be decided on appeal in the interest of judicial economy