387 (1985). In the instant case, the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his appellate attorney was disbarred during the course of his representation. The petitioner was deprived of a full and fair review of his appeal due to this, and the same appellate counsel failed to brief several crucial issues to the petitioner. Mor 32 petition one ‘crucial issue’ his appellate counsel failed to raise on direct appeal and fails to proffer what his appellate counsel could have added to the record that would have caused a different result on direct appeal. Finally, Madison fails to identify ... one example of ineffective assistance from his trial counsel his appellate counsel should have raised on direct appeal. See Coral v. State, [900 So.2d 1274] (Ala. Crim.App.2004) (<HOLDING>). The Court finds the allegation of ineffective
holding that an ineffective assistance of counsel claim alleged to be cause for the procedural default of other claims is itself an independent claim subject to the procedural requirements of exhaustion holding that each subcategory of ineffective assistance of counsel is an independent claim that must be sufficiently plead holding that to the extent defendants claim is one of ineffective assistance of counsel it is not cognizable on direct appeal and rule 2915 is the exclusive procedure by which a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can be advanced holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel