If reasonable cause exists, the court should make such a finding on the record and appoint a substitute attorney, who should be allowed adequate time to prepare a defense. Weaver v. State, 894 So.2d 178 (Fla.2004). Orta’s counsel stated repeatedly that she was unprepared to proceed to trial. While counsel’s admissions of incompetence are not binding on the trial court, the record is clear that trial counsel had failed to take any of the steps reasonably necessary to prepare for this hearing. On these facts, Orta had a legitimate complaint about his attorney and reasonable cause existed that his attorney was not competent to try the case. Accordingly, the trial court abused its discretion by failing to appoint new counsel for Orta. See Guardado v. State, 965 So.2d 108 (Fla.2007)(<HOLDING>). REVERSED and REMANDED. PLEUS and LAWSON, JJ.,
holding that decision to sentence juvenile as an adult subject to abuse of discretion review holding a trial courts decision involving withdrawal or discharge of counsel is subject to review for abuse of discretion holding that the district courts decision whether to remand for further proceedings or payment of benefits is discretionary and is subject to review for abuse of discretion holding that the distinct courts decision whether to remand for further proceedings or payment of benefits is discretionary and is subject to review for abuse of discretion holding that court reviews trial courts decision to release a defendant for abuse of discretion