claim cannot be based on “the legal rights or claims of third parties.” Id. at 499, 95 S.Ct. 2197. Second, the injury complained of must be “ ‘fairly ... trace[able] to the challenged action of the defendant, and not ... th[e] result [of] the independent action of some third party not before the court.’ ” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 559, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (citations omitted). Additionally, the alleged injury must not have been the result of the party’s own actions or inactions. See Jackson-Bey v. Hanslmaier, 115 F.3d 1091, 1095 (2d Cir.1997) (finding that plaintiff had no standing to bring a § 1983 action because any injury that he suffered was the result of his failure to properly register his religion with the Bureau of Prisons); Petro-Chem Processing, Inc. v. EPA, 866 F.2d 433 (D.C.Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). Third, “it must be ‘likely,’ as opposed to
holding an organization had standing because some of its individual members did holding that a nonprofit organization lacked standing under unruh because its civil rights had not been personally violated and it failed to show that any of its members would suffer injury holding that an organization lacked standing to challenge allegedly lax epa regulations of hazardous waste because its members did not have to follow the lax procedures holding that an organization whose members are injured may represent those members even where the organization itself cannot show injury holding that an environmental group established constitutional standing where its members lived near a landfill into which an epa regulation allegedly would permit certain hazardous wastes to be deposited