in which the statements were made to officers in a police station. Like in Davis, Randy too is frantic. Although several minutes into the call, Randy learns Brenda is at the police station, he is still afraid she will come into the trailer at any moment. Randy’s belief Brenda might still enter to trailer to hurt him despite the 911 operator’s reassurance she is not on the property underscores that Randy is not calm and rational and is still operating as though the attack is still in progress. Further, Randy’s statements after the operator assured him Brenda was at the police station and would not be coming back are the same statements he made earlier in the call before he was told Brenda was not outside the trailer. See State v. Wyatt, 317 S.C. 370, 373, 453 S.E.2d 890, 891 (1995) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, the trial court did not abuse
recognizing that no prejudice results where the evidence erroneously admitted was merely cumulative and an appellate court will not reverse for harmless error in the admission of evidence holding that new evidence is evidence not previously of record and not merely cumulative of other evidence holding that admission of hearsay constituted harmless error when there was more than sufficient other evidence in the record to support the verdict holding that new evidence must be evidence that is not merely cumulative holding error in admission of evidence is harmless when it was merely cumulative to other evidence in the record