on the ultimate value of viral YouTube clips, as the main characters discover that while society is willing to watch absurd video clips on the internet, our society simultaneous assigns little monetary value to such works. The South Park “take” on the WWITB video is truly transformative, in that it takes the original work and uses parts of the video to not only poke fun at the original, but also to comment on a bizarre social trend, solidifying the work as a classic parody. See Campbell, 510 U.S. at 580, 114 S.Ct. 1164 (noting that a “parody” comments “on the original or eritieiz[es] it to some degree.”) Such use of a copyrighted work, which uses the work and transforms it for another purpose, lends this court to conclude that the defendants’ use is fair. Id. at 579, 114 S.Ct. 1164 (<HOLDING>); see generally Keller and Cunard, Copyright
recognizing that  the work to be completed in accordance with the time limits of section 6 is the work for which lien enforcement is sought holding that the more transformative the new work the more likely the use of the old work is a fair one holding that 101 mets is more than enough for the performance of light work holding that where the plaintiffs allegations concerning a hostile work environment consist of facts that occurred more than one year before the filing of the complaint such a claim is timebarred holding that your work exclusion is triggered only where the damage at issue is to work performed by you and is caused by work performed by you  and does not apply to damage caused to original construction of a house during later repair work