motion for a new trial must be filed within ten days of the entry of the judgment or order from which appeal is taken.”) (citations omitted). Conwill’s judgment of conviction of burglary was entered on April 8, 2008. So to be timely — and to toll the time limit to appeal— Conwill’s motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict would have to have been filed within ten days of that date. Instead it was not filed until more than forty days later, on May 22, 2008. So it did not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal. ¶ 20. While it appears that the judge told Conwill he had an additional thirty days to file a notice of appeal out of an abundance of caution, we find the judge lacked the authority to extend the expired time limit to file an appeal. Ross, 16 So.3d at 53 (¶ 7) (<HOLDING>). So when Conwill announced for the second time
holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal after an untimely filing of a notice of appeal holding that the circuit judge did not have the authority to extend the thirtyday time limit for filing a notice of appeal holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal holding that time limit for filing petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional holding that a second motion to reconsider served within ten days of the denial of the first motion does not extend the time period for filing a notice of appeal from the underlying judgment