manner. They also attempted to abduct her two-year-old son by trying to wrest him from her arms on a street near their home. The immigration judge (IJ) denied asylum, holding in part that ValienteHerrera did not show past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) summarily affirmed. We grant the petition for review and reverse. The long history of anti-government guerrillas terrorizing innocent eitizens in Guatemala on account of actual or imputed political opinion is well-established. See, e.g., Garcia-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 1066, 1074-75 (9th Cir.2004) (“The human rights abuses that took place during Guatemala’s decades-long civil war have been well-documented.”); Rios v. Ashcroft, 287 F.3d 895, 898-901 (9th Cir. 2002) (<HOLDING>); Ruano v. Ashcroft, 301 F.3d 1155, 1158 (9th
holding that fathers military service alone was neither political opinion nor sufficient to establish imputed political opinion holding there was sufficient evidence of persecution on account of imputed political opinion where guerillas abducted petitioner because her husband and broth er were members of the guatemalan army holding that attempted conscription by a guatemalan guerrilla group did not constitute persecution on account of a political opinion where petitioner failed to show that the group was motivated by his political opinion holding that imputed political opinion is a protected ground holding that guatemalan guerrillas abducted petitioner on account of imputed political opinion because of her relatives military service