12446, at *2 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Oct. 7, 2013, no pet. h.). Now Appellant wants to raise new issues pertaining to the assessment of a $10 subpoena fee and $90 in sheriffs fees. Although Appellant asserts a newly issued Bill of Costs presents a new “twist” because it contains a breakdown of the sheriffs fee that did not appear in the original Bill of Costs, the fact of the matter is both disputed fees appeared on the original Bill of Costs, which was attached to and incorporated in the trial court’s judgment on appeal. As such, Appellant could have contested those fees in her merits brief. A party to an appeal is not entitled to raise new issues for the first time in a motion for rehearing. See E.F. Hutton & Co. v. Youngblood, 741 S.W.2d 363, 364 (Tex.1987) (per curiam) (op. on reh’g) (<HOLDING>). “[T]he sole purpose of a motion for rehearing
holding that an argument raised for the first time in a rule 59e motion is waived on appeal holding that an argument made for the first time in a motion for reconsideration comes too late and is ordinarily deemed waived holding that where party made argument for first time in motion for rehearing in court of appeals error if any was waived holding that under the circumstances of that case an argument made for the first time in a motion for rehearing was waived holding that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is waived