the Eleventh Circuit, it is well-settled that the Bankruptcy Court can impose contempt sanctions on a violator of the automatic stay as it could for the violation of any of its orders. Jove Eng’g, Inc. v. I.R.S., 92 F.3d 1539, 1546 (11th Cir.1996) ("We have characterized the automatic stay of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) as ‘essentially a court-ordered injunction, [and] any person or entity who violates the stay may be found in contempt of court.’ ” (quoting Carver v. Carver, 954 F.2d 1573, 1578 (11th Cir.1992))). Although, as Jove later states, the stay has some aspects that are dissimilar from other court orders, these differences do not implicate the fundamental aspect of similarity in view here — the protection of the dignity and jurisdiction of the court. See In re Rushing, 443 B.R. at 85 (<HOLDING>). 27 . H.R.Rep. No. 95-595, at 10, reprinted in
recognizing a heightened interest in ensuring discipline in police departments recognizing each individual bankruptcy courts unique interest in interpreting and enforcing stay in pending cases recognizing that congress has a legitimate interest in ensuring that a child who becomes an american citizen has a real relationship with a family unit and with the united states recognizing statutory nature of stay but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance recognizing statutory credit