that he “didn’t want a woman riding on his [fire truck]”; Plaintiff was denied requests for leave because other male medics had already requested the time off (although sometimes her leave requests were granted); Plaintiff filed several formal complaints and grievances which were never addressed by the County; and Plaintiff was told by Chief O’Brien that she had the option to revoke one of her complaints and that if she did not, she might be suspended for 30 days. Other than Captain Mitchel’s comments, there is no evidence that any of these behaviors were “based on” Plaintiffs female status. Trask, 822 F.3d at 1196 (“[T]he plaintiffs 1, 578-79 (11th Cir. 2000), overruled on other grounds by Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 126 S.Ct. 2405, 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (2006) (<HOLDING>) with Hulsey v. Pride Restaurants, LLC, 367
holding that conduct was sufficiently severe or pervasive where the female plaintiffs supervisor frequently tried to get plaintiff to date him using many direct as well as indirect propositions for sex including following her into the restroom repeated attempts to touch her breasts place his hands down her pants and pull off her pants and enlisting the assistance of others to hold her while he attempted to grope her holding that a plaintiff could not make out an aetionable hostile work environment claim where supervisor told vulgar jokes placed his vibrating pager against her upper thigh on two occasions as he walked by her in the hall and asked if it felt good and pulled at her overalls after she told him she was wearing a thong holding that conduct was not sufficiently severe or pervasive where a supervisor allegedly touched plaintiffs hand and thigh lifted her dress hem repeatedly asked her to lunch told her that she was beautiful stared at her and called her home on numerous occasions at night and asked about personal matters holding that the plaintiffs evidence of pretext which included but was not limited to her supervisors statement that she had enough of the plaintiff going to her supervisor about her was not sufficient to preclude summary judgment holding that where male teacher asked female teacher out for a drink asked her to perform tasks she perceived as secretarial and struck her in a fight purported harassment was not genderbased and was not sufficiently severe or pervasive