that they are to be paid overtime in accordance with the FLSA. Def.’s Supplemental Br. at 1-2 (stating that the term “officer” applies to Plaintiffs and noting that the term when used in conjunction with the term canine handler “refer to officers assigned to specially trained canines for the performance of their duties”); see Pis.’ Supplemental Br. at 1-2. As such, even if the CBA did satisfy the waiver standard, which it does not-this subsequent agreement that the parties executed five months after they entered into the - CBA evinces an “explicitly stated” contrary intent as the term “[o]vertime” is actually used, weighing against finding a “clear and unmistakable” waiver. See Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., 450 U.S. 728, 740-41, 101 S.Ct. 1437, 67 L.Ed.2d 641 (1981) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). Accordingly, the court finds
holding in the private sector context that flsa rights cannot be abridged by contract or otherwise waived  and stating that in any event congressionally granted flsa rights take precedence over conflicting provisions in a collectively bargained compensation arrangement holding that individual rights under the flsa may not be waived through agreement holding that employees may not contract away their flsa rights holding same in the flsa retaliation context holding under flsa