send flyers home with students, and advertise their activities in the Eagle Eye, then Praying Parents are entitled to similar consideration, otherwise Lakeview may demonstrate hostility to religion and violate the First Amendment through unreasonable viewpoint discrimination. See Good News Club, 533 U.S. at 106-107, 114, 121 S.Ct. 2093 (“The Good News Club seeks nothing more than to be treated neutrally and given access to speak about the same topics as are other groups.”); Rosenberger v. University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 828, 115 S.Ct. 2510, 132 L.Ed.2d 700 (1995) (“Discrimination against speech because of its message is presumed to be unconstitutional.”); Lamb’s Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free Sch. Dist., 508 U.S. 384, 394-395, 113 S.Ct. 2141, 124 L.Ed.2d 352 (1993) (<HOLDING>); Rusk, 379 F.3d at 424; Daugherty, 116
holding school board could not deny church right to show film on school property where permission was denied solely because film dealt with an otherwise permissible subject from a religious standpoint holding that a school district was not liable for sexual molestation of plaintiffs daughter by a teacher even though the acts occurred on school property and during school hours holding that petitioners status as school board members does not permit them to step into the shoes of the school board and invoke its right to appeal holding school district violated first amendment when it denied church use of public school facilities to show film series solely because it presented a religious view of family values holding that mandamus was proper where the school board was seeking removal for grounds not enumerated in section 1080 of the school code