Ford told him that the driver had handed the contraband to him when the officers stopped the car and told Mr. Ford to hide it in the back seat armrest compartment. When Officer Freed-Vest spoke to Mr. Ford in the squad car, he denied that the marijuana was his. He told her that he thought both ziplock bags had been in the white trash bag and that one had fallen out onto the floor board when the driver threw them into the back seat. The officers arrested Mr. Ford for possession of 1104 grams of marijuana and possession of marijuana with intent to sell or deliver. The trial court found that Mr. Ford committed two violations of community control condition (5), as charged, by failing to live and remain at liberty without violating any law and one violation of condition (7) by po CA 1987) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, Mr. Ford did not have actual
holding that jurys failure to find the defendant guilty of possession of marijuana could not be reconciled with a verdict of guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to purchase holding evidence that marijuana was found in jointly occupied vehicle in open view was insufficient to establish defendants dominion and control by preponderance of evidence holding that the defendants dominion control and knowledge may be inferred if he had exclusive possession of the premises on which the object was found emphasis added holding defendants transitory touching of bale of marijuana when he weighed it to be purchased by third party did not establish dominion and control for possession charge holding that a defendants conviction for two possession of marijuana counts could not be supported by his possession of two marijuana cigarettes dropped from his hand and again for his possession of several packets of marijuana found in a nearby jacket during the same search