and such provisions “cannot make out the requisite congressional intent to confer individual rights enforceable by § 1983.” Gonzaga, 536 U.S. at 289, 122 S.Ct. at 2278. Further, Congress has required the Secretary of Health and Human Services to promulgate regulations for the review of the child welfare and adoption assistance programs set out in Parts B and E in order “to determine whether such programs are in substantial conformity with — State plan requirements under such parts B and E.” 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-2a(a)(l) (emphasis added). The substantial conformity requirement is similar to FERPA’s, which the Court in Gonzaga concluded showed an aggregate instead of an individual focus. 536 U.S. at 288, 122 S.Ct. at 2278; see also Blessing, 520 U.S. at 335, 343, 117 S.Ct. at 1357, 1361 (<HOLDING>). As for enforcement of §§ 675(5)(D) and (E),
holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation holding the provisions of a new york welfare program that conflicted with federal regulations under the social security act invalid under the supremacy clause holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient holding that title ivd of the social security act did not support a right enforceable pursuant to  1983 in part because the statute mandated substantial compliance with federal regulations holding a social security number is not private