v. Cafe Erotica, Inc., 270 Ga. 97, 507 S.E.2d 732, 734 (1998). The parties do not dispute that plaintiffs have met this test. Under the second prong of the Central Hudson test, the court must consider whether Missouri’s governmental interest is substantial. As set forth in § 226.531.5, RSMo 2000, the stated purpose of this legislation is to address the adverse secondary effects of sexually-oriented businesses, to improve traffic safety, to limit harm to minors, and to reduce prostitution, crime, juvenile delinquency, deterioration in property values, and lethargy in neighborhood improvement efforts. A governmental entity is entitled to rely on the experience of other jurisdictions in determining the needs to'be addressed in relation to adu inneapolis, 116 F.3d 1216 (8th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Id. at 1218, 1221; City of Los Angeles v.
holding that state has interest in regulating businesses that distribute defective products in that state holding that the agency cannot use insufficient evidence as a basis for finding no adverse impact holding that as a matter of settled law regulations aimed at minimizing the secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses serve a significant and substantial governmental interest and finding that studies considered and information gathered by the city of minneapolis support the citys regulation of signs of such businesses in its effort to minimize secondary adverse impact holding on summary judgment that a regulation is narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest holding that regulating the location of adult films does not violate the first amendment and citing as support the proposition that reasonable regulations of the time place and manner of protected speech where those regulations are necessary to further significant governmental interests are permitted by the first amendment