injury to the debtor's estate which ultimately affect all creditors belong to trustee); Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F.3d 1085, 1094 (2d Cir.1995) (claims predicated upon the distribution of misleading documents to investors are the property of those investors, and may be asserted only by them because cause of action required proof that each individual investor relied on the misleading statement); E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc. v. Hadley, 901 F.2d 979, 985-87 (11th Cir.1990) (trustee had no standing to assert against third party claims of certain individual creditors who purchased securities through the debtor on its margin account with the third party, which subsequently sold the securities); St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. PepsiCo, Inc., 884 F.2d 688, 701-02 (2d Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); Steyr-Daimler-Puch of Am. Corp. v. Pappas,
holding that third party creditor had no standing to pursue alter ego claim against bankrupt subsidiarys parent company alter ego claim could be pursued by bankrupt organization under ohio law and thus alter ego claim belonged to trustee holding that delaware law requires fraud injustice or inequity to be shown before the alter ego doctrine can be used to find personal jurisdiction over a parent corporation holding that the trustee could not bring a claim against sole shareholders of bankrupt corporation where shareholders had not looted or otherwise injured the corporation holding that a lawsuit against a corporation that purchased assets from a bankrupt is not a claim against the debtor holding that a litigant may not claim standing to assert the rights of a third party