for failing to file a motion for an in camera hearing, pursuant to Arkansas’s rape-shield statute, and for failing to investigate other sources of the victim’s prior sexual knowledge. Appellant further contends that his trial counsel’s deficiency prejudiced him because it left the jury with no alternate explanation of the minor victim’s prior knowledge of sexual matters. Pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Criminal Procedure 37.3(a) (2011), the circuit court has the discretion to deny relief without a hearing. We have previously interpreted Rule 37.3 to provide that an evidentiary hearing should be held in a postconviction proceeding unless the files and record of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief. Sanders v. State, 352 Ark. 16, 98 S.W.3d 35 (2003) (<HOLDING>). Pursuant to Rule 37.1, a petitioner has the
holding that it is undisputed that the trial court has discretion pursuant to rule 373a to decide whether the files or records are  insufficient to sustain the courts findings without a hearing holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence holding that a trial court cannot decide the issue of attorneys fees without findings as to one spouses ability to pay and the others need holding that trial courts limited findings were insufficient to allow determination of whether trial court abused its discretion in denying defendants motion to dismiss his indictment on constitutional speedy trial grounds holding that it is not the courts role to decide whether an experts opinion is correct