“violent crime” followed by the parenthetical phrase “including a crime involving assault with a deadly weapon[.]” First, we must determine whether the legislature intended the words “violent crime” to mean an element based offense or a factually based offense. Black’s Law Dictionary defines “violent crime” as “[a] crime that has as an element the use, attempted use, threatened use, or substantial risk of use of physical force against the person or property of another.” Black’s Law Dictionary 378 (7th ed. 1999) (citation omitted) (emphasis added). Thus, the definition of violent crime suggests that the legislature intended for courts to apply an elements-based analysis under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1003(a). See also State v. Davison, 201 N.C. App. 354, 364, 689 S.E.2d 510, 517 (2009) (<HOLDING>), disc. review denied, 364 N.C. 599, 703 S.E.2d
holding that even though the offense was not of a sexual nature requiring the defendant to register as a sex offender following his conviction for false imprisonment of a minor was rationally related to the government interest in protecting the public and did not violate the defendants right to due process or equal protection under the law holding that the general assemblys repeated use of the term conviction compels us to conclude that when making a determination pursuant to ncgs  1420840a of whether the defendant committed an aggravated offense for purposes of sex offender monitoring the trial court is only to consider the elements of the offense of which a defendant was convicted and is not to consider the underlying factual scenario giving rise to the conviction holding that an award of restitution is only for the loss caused by the specific conduct that is the basis of the offense of conviction holding that an indictment like that returned against defendant in this case did not suffice to permit a court to determine for purposes of the modified categorical approach that the defendant was convicted of the offense made punishable by ncgs  142021a2 holding that once the statute is found to be divisible the court must look to the charging papers and judgment of conviction to determine if the actual crime of which defendant was convicted was a crime of violence but emphasizing that the court is not to examine the particular facts underlying the conviction