of Colorado belong to the people, but so does the land. There must be a balancing effect, and the elements of water and land must be used in harmony to the maximum feasible use of both. Id. at 191, 529 P.2d at 1327 (emphasis in original); accord R.J.A., Inc. v. Water Users Ass’n of Dist. 6, 690 P.2d 823, 828-29 (Colo. 1984) (effects on other resources and preservation of the natural environment are proper considerations for the water court in implementing the beneficial use of water); In re Rules & Regulations Governing the Use, Control, and Protection of Wader Rights, 674 P.2d 914, 935 (Colo.1983) (“Optimum use [of water] can only be achieved with proper regard for all significant factors, including environmental and economic concerns.”); §§ 37-92-102(3), -103(4), 15 C.R.S. (1990) (<HOLDING>). These provisions and precedents leave little
recognizing the need for natural gas supply as a substantial public interest recognizing the need for reasonable preservation of the natural environment and allowing minimum stream flow and natural lake surface level and volume appropriations on behalf of the people of the state of colorado for that purpose holding that the county was immune from suit for injuries incurred in a collision on a manmade lake under the california tort claims act which provides governmental immunity for an injury caused by a natural condition of any unimproved public property including but not limited to any natural condition of ary lake stream bay river or beach quoting cal govcode  8312 holding the foster parents responsible for support where the childs natural parents are unknown and noting that an earlier new york case held that an agreement to adopt did not terminate the natural parents duty of support but that in that earlier case the natural parent was alive and capable of providing for the child recognizing the position of the ose that the rio grandes surface waters are fully appropriated and that new surface water appropriations are not allowed