For convenience, references to the Missis-sippi Rules of Professional Conduct are short-ened to "Mississippi Rule-”, 6 . "The ‘reasonable hourly rate’ for the lode-star calculation is ‘calculated according to the prevailing market rates in the relevant com-munity’ and must be ‘in line with those pre-vailing in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience and reputation.' ” Idom v. Natchez-Adams Sch. Dist., No. 5:14cv38, 2016 WL 320954, at *3 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 25, 2016) (quoting McClain v. Lufkin Indus., Inc., 649 F.3d 374, 381 (5th Cir. 2011)). 7 . Cases awarding fees in excess of the recov-ery pursuant to federal civil rights fee-shifting statutes carry no weight here. See Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Qore, Inc., 647 F.3d 237, 248 (5th Cir. 2011) (<HOLDING>). Those fee awards are predicated on
holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding that a law clerks time is recoverable as part of attorneys fees under  1988 holding defendant may receive only the portion of his fees under 42 usc  1988 that he would not have paid but for the frivolous claim holding that 42 usc  1988 authorizes the grant of attorneys fees for services on appeal though statute does not specifically so provide holding that a case awarding fees under 42 usc  1988 has no application in a private claim for attorneys fees sounding in mississippi contract law