at 1186. In United States v. Reeves, 524 F.3d 1161 (10th Cir.2008), the Tenth Circuit established that “[o]pening the door to one’s home is not voluntary if ordered to. do so under color of authority.” 524 F.3d at 1167. The Tenth Circuit has repeatedly held that, absent exigent circumstances, officials acting under the color of authority and without a warrant may not seize a person inside their home, or effect a seizure by ordering a person inside a home to come to the door. See United States v. Maez, 872 F.2d 1444, 1446 (10th Cir.1989) (recognizing a seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment when police surrounded an .individual’s house for three hours and ordered the individual out of his home under drawn firearms); United States v. Flowers, 336 F.3d 1222, 1225-27 (10th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). In United States v. Reeves, police-officers
holding that police orders to openthe door which led to an arrest inside the home represented an unconstitutional seizure holding that arrest took place inside home even though officers did not physically enter residence to place suspect in custody holding that an unconstitutional seizure occurred when police officers discovered that a suspect illegally sold alcohol from his home and ordered him to open the door involuntarily to be arrested inside his home holding that arrest by the back door of defendants house was unlawful holding that if a residents decision to open his door to police is made involuntarily a seizure within his home has occurred