home—across the street from victim’s home—was in Fulton County). We note that although the case has not been overruled, the logic in Jones has been called into question. See O’Donnell, 294 Ga. at 313-14 (Nahmias, J., concurring) (opining that, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, jurors can very reasonably infer that a location within 100 yards of a location in a particular county is in the same county and that Jones should be overruled if its erroneous logic would result in a conviction being reversed due to pur ing that “[a]ny enumeration of error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument may be deemed abandoned”). 29 Brittain v. State, 329 Ga. App. 689, 704 (4) (a) (766 SE2d 106) (2014) (punctuation omitted). 30 See Brewer, 280 Ga. at 20-21 (3) (<HOLDING>); Brittain, 329 Ga. App. at 704 (4) (a)
recognizing that in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel a movant must show that he was prejudiced by his counsels performance holding that similar allegations were insufficient to state a due process claim holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel holding that defendants mere allegations of ineffective assistance were insufficient to prevail on such a claim