535 So.2d 642 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Because the appellant did not file a direct appeal, his July 31, 2007, conviction and sentence became final and the two-year time limitation began to run on August 30, 2007. Two years from that date was Saturday, August 30, 2009. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.040 specifically provides that the last date of the period so computed shall be counted, unless it is Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday or a legal holiday. The record shows that Saavedra placed his 3.850 petition into the correctional facility’s hands for mailing on Monday, August 31, 2009, and thus Saavedra’s motion was timely filed. See Thompson v. State, 761 So.2d 324 (Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>). We reverse for consideration of Saavedra’s
holding that under the mailbox rule the date that a motion is placed into the hands of prison officials for filing is the date that the motion is considered filed holding that because the finality of judgment is effectively postponed by the timely filing of a motion under rule 59 the deadline for filing a motion for attorneys fees is tolled until the postjudgment motion is resolved holding that the relevant time of inquiry is the date of the filing of the complaint holding that the date of filing is the time at which a pro se prisoner entrusts the document to prison officials for delivery holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act