species of professional negligence where the parties involved have been in a professional relationship. See Cubito v. Kreisberg, 69 A.D.2d 738, 419 N.Y.S.2d 578 (1979); See abo Architectural Malpractice: Toward an Equitable Rule for Determining When the Statute of Limitations Begins to Run, 16 Fordham Urb.LJ. 509 (1988). Also, we note that some jurisdictions explicitly require direct privity for the malpractice statute of limitations to apply. See Fla.Stat. § 95.-ll(4)(a) (1991); Baskerville-Donovan v. Pensacola Exec., 581 So.2d 1301 (Fla.Í991). 5 . Other jurisdictions have similarly concluded that engineers and architects are professionals for purposes of statutes of limitations for malpractice actions. See e.g. Board of Regents v. Wibcam Mullins Birge, Inc., 433 N.W.2d 478 (Neb.1988) (<HOLDING>); Vandevelde v. Falb City Builders, Inc., 744
holding that architects and engineers were professionals for purposes of twoyear statute of limitations for professional negligence actions holding that a twoyear statute of limitations applies to negligence claims under texas law holding that a compulsory counterclaim was barred by pennsylvanias twoyear statute of limitations notwithstanding that the plaintiff filed his complaint late in the twoyear limitations period holding that a twoyear statute of limitations period applies to all  1983 actions brought in pennsylvania holding kansas law provides twoyear statute of limitations for  1983 actions measured from date cause of action arose