the elements of the crime was that the defendant had been required to appear at the time in question, and holding that it was proper to infer the defendant’s willfulness from the fact that he had notice of the hearing date); Abdul-Musawwir v. State, 483 N.E.2d 464, 466 (Ind.Ct.App.1985) (affirming conviction where the defendant failed to appear for trial date and stating that an element of the crime is that the defendant be required to appear at a specific time and place)). {18} One court held that, although it might seem appropriate to utilize a bail jumping statute for failure to pay fines, a defendant is not generally required to appear to pay a fine or penalty. See Ellmore, supra, § 25[b], at 1132 (citing People v. Sanchez, 119 Misc.2d 525, 464 N.Y.S.2d 674, 676 (N.Y.Crim.Ct.1983) (<HOLDING>)). Another court reversed a bail jumping
recognizing willful failure to appear as an essential element of the bailjumping offense holding that one essential element of the crime of failing to notify the appropriate sheriff of a sex offenders change of address is that the defendant is a person required  to register  holding that the defendant could not be charged with bail jumping for failing to pay a fine and emphasizing that an essential element of the crime of failure to appear was that the defendants personal appearance was actually required in a criminal proceeding holding that the defendants oral promise to appear was insufficient to amount to a required appearance within the meaning of the failure to appear statute holding that failure to instruct on an essential element was harmless error because the element was so clearly established