all of the complaint’s allegations and any reasonable inferences they support in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Al-Saffy v. Vilsack, 827 F.3d 85, 89, 92 (D.C. Cir. 2016). We can affirm only if the district court committed no material error of law and there are no genuinely disputéd issues of material fact. Id. at 92. A The district court’s starting premise—that information contained in attachments to a formal EEO complaint cannot support exhaustion—was incorrect. See Crawford, 166 F.Supp.3d at 9. Attachments to a formal EEO complaint are an integral part of the complaint and can independently identify claims for resolution regardless of whether the attachment is also referenced in the body of the complaint itself. Indeed, the official EEO complaint , 876 (4th Cir. 2013) (<HOLDING>); Fantini v. Salem State Coll., 557 F.3d 22, 27
holding plaintiff exhausted administrative remedies based on additional sheets attached to eeo complaint holding that if adequate administrative remedies are available it is improper to seek relief in court before those remedies are exhausted holding plaintiff had exhausted claim because his attachment to his eeo complaint set forth sufficient factual details holding that administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to filing a claim in court holding that the prisoner has the burden of demonstrating he has exhausted his administrative remedies in his complaint