once again, the ALJ failed to explain how the agency physicians’ opinions were consistent with the medical evidence or Ulloa’s activities. Indeed, it is unclear how the ALJ came to the conclusion that Ulloa’s activities, which include occasional cooking and cleaning, going to church, walking five minutes to a nearby store and doing exercises prescribed to alleviate pain, are consistent with the ability to lift twenty pounds or sit, stand or walk for up to six hours in an eight-hour day. Based on the foregoing, this Court finds that the ALJ’s RFC determination is not supported by substantial evidence because he failed to sufficiently articulate his assessment of the evidence to enable us to trace the path of his reasoning. Consequently, remand is warranted. Clifford, 227 F.3d at 870 (<HOLDING>). C. The ALJ Failed to Explain the Weight Given
holding that the alj gave inadequate reasons for rejecting wifes lay opinion testimony holding the record must demonstrate that the alj considered all of the evidence and the alj must discuss  the evidence supporting his decision  the uncontroverted evidence he chooses not to rely upon and significantly probative evidence he rejects holding the alj is not required to address every piece of evidence but he must articulate some legitimate reason for his decision recognizing that an alj must minimally articulate his reasons for crediting or rejecting evidence of disability recognizing that an alj has a duty to ensure that an adequate record is developed during the disability hearing consistent with the issues raised 