purpose of tattooing is to produce the tattoo, and the tattoo cannot be created without the tattooing process any more than the Declaration of Independence could have been created without a goose quill, foolscap, and ink. Thus, as with writing or painting, the tattooing process is inextricably intertwined with the purely expressive product (the tattoo), and is itself entitled to full First Amendment protection. We are further persuaded by the fact that the process of tattooing is more akin to traditional modes of expression (like writing) than the process involved in producing a parade, which the Supreme Court has held cannot be meaningfully separated from the parade’s expressive product in terms of the constitutional protection afforded. See Hurley, 515 U.S. at 568, 115 S.Ct. 2338 (<HOLDING>). Thus, we have no difficulty holding that the
recognizing the inherent power of the courts to issue warrants holding that employees vacation benefits are form of compensation for services rendered and are not gratuity holding the court has the inherent authority to enter an order of confidentiality recognizing inherent power of courts of appeals holding that parades are  a form of expression not just motion and noting the inherent expressiveness of marching