for examination of her related complaints, and noting that Plaintiff had a ganglion cyst in her left wrist. (Tr. 428). There are no records diagnosing Plaintiff with carpal tunnel or restless leg syndrome, and Plaintiffs assertions of such impairments are insufficient to establish that they existed. See Poupore v. Astrue, 566 F.3d 303, 307 (2d Cir.2009) (finding plaintiffs subjective complaints were insufficient to establish a disability where they were unsupported by objective medical evidence). Further, there is no evidence in the record to suggest that Plaintiff followed up with a neurologist to receive evaluation or treatment for carpal tunnel or restless leg syndrome. See Stroud v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 13 Civ. 3251(AT)(JCF), 2014 WL 4652581, at *11 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 8, 2014) (<HOLDING>); see also Arnone v. Bowen, 882 F.2d 34, 39 (2d
holding the alj was permitted to consider fact claimant had not sought treatment for her alleged back pain holding that an alj may consider a claimants household activities in evaluating complaints of disabling pain holding that lack of medical evidence cannot form the sole basis for discounting pain testimony but is a factor that an alj may consider holding that exaggeration of pain versus treatment sought was substantial evidence for the aljs credibility determination holding it is error for an alj to fail to consider factors relevant to the pain analysis which are supported by the record