that time. I think — I thought that a reasonable and just and sufficient sentence was the 41 months, and I think that now with credit for time served. The sentence is within the guideline range. That range does not exceed 24 months. The Court finds no reason to depart from the sentenced called for by the application of the guidelines. The Court finds the sentence to be reasonable and sufficient. And even though you did make a request for it, under 3553(a)(1) through (7) of 18 U.S.C., the Court specifically finds that the sentence is reasonable, sufficient, and adequate. We find it plain that the court treated the Guidelines range as advisory on resentencing, and therefore, Booker did not preclude the court from making and relying on the challenged fact findings. Chau, 426 F.3d at 1323 (<HOLDING>). It is now well-settled that a district court
holding a sentence within the advisory guidelines range is presumptively reasonable holding that the pennsylvania sentencing guidelines are purely advisory in nature holding guidelines to be only advisory holding that the use of extraverdict enhancements in an advisory guidelines system is not unconstitutional quotation omitted holding that the cocaine guidelines  are advisory only