(or reexamination) of all available public records when initial mailings have been promptly returned as undeliverable.” Plemons, 396 F.3d at 577. Because Ms. Plemons’ Quarry Pointe address was not “ascertainable” from the public records I FIND that she is not entitled to set aside the tax sale deed now held by Advantage’s successor in interest, Douglas Q. Gale. For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS the defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket 67] and DENIES the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment [Docket 70], Because the court’s order does not rely on the discovery and evidence relating to Jerry Lipscomb, the defendants’ Motion to Exclude [Docket 72] is DENIED as MOOT. The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order A.2d 1364, 1365-66 (R.I.1996) (<HOLDING>); But see Elizondo v. Read, 588 N.E.2d 501, 504
holding that as part of showing that a warrantless entry was imperative the government must demonstrate that a warrant could not have been obtained in time even by telephone under the procedure authorized by fedrcrimp 41c2 holding that the constitutional level of punitive damages is not a finding of fact that must be determined by the jury it may be determined de novo by the court holding that a correct address could have been determined by checking telephone directory holding that witness whose life had been threatened forcing him to relocate was not required to disclose true name address or telephone number holding that adts failure to dispatch ems to correct address was not actionable in tort