in the Mathews inquiry is “the private interest affected by the official action.” Mathews, 424 U.S. at 335, 96 S.Ct. 893. The deprivation of real or personal property involves substantial due process interests. See James Daniel Good Real Prop., 510 U.S. at 53-54, 114 S.Ct. 492 (recognizing that “Good’s right to maintain control over his home, and to be free from governmental interference, is a private interest of historic and continuing importance”); id. at 81, 114 S.Ct. 492 (Thomas, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (agreeing with the majority that “[i]ndividual freedom finds tangible expression in property rights”); Doehr, 501 U.S. at 11, 111 S.Ct. 2105 (“[T]he property interests that attachment affects are significant.”); Fuentes, 407 U.S. at 70-71, 92 S.Ct. 1983 (<HOLDING>). The particular importance of motor vehicles
holding that loss of household furniture and appliances warrants a predeprivation hearing holding that loss of an arm includes loss of the hand holding that purchasing and supplying gasconsuming appliances was incidental to gas companys corporate purpose of manufacturing and supplying illuminating and heating gas holding that proof of loss is not evidence of extent of loss and insured is not precluded from showing his damages were greater than shown in proof of loss holding that the loss of a contract failed to constitute ascertainable loss under cutpa