that plaintiff seeks declaratory relief with respect to the IRS summonses, the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, bars his claim. Section 2201(a) authorizes a court of the United States to “declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party,” but expressly excludes cases “with respect to Federal taxes,” subject to one exception not applicable here. See Bob Jones Univ. v. Simon, 416 U.S. 725, 732-33 n. 7, 94 S.Ct. 2038, 40 L.Ed.2d 496 (1974) (“The congressional antipathy for premature interference with the assessment or collection of any federal tax also extends to declaratory judgments.... [T]he federal tax exception to the Declaratory Judgment Act is at least as broad as the Anti-Injunction Act.”); Murphy v. United States, 493 F.3d 170, 174 (D.C.Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); Taylor, 292 Fed.Appx. at 388 (holding that
holding in the context of a plaintiffs suit to recover income taxes that congress has preserved the immunity of the united states from declaratory  relief with respect to all tax controversies except those pertaining to the classification of organizations under  501c of the internal revenue code holding that the segregation of funds was not a prerequisite to the establishment of a statutory trust under the internal revenue code holding that interest received by a foreign corporation on a tax refund from the united states was interest on an interestbearing obligation of a resident of the united states within income tax statute holding language sufficient to override antialienation provisions of internal revenue code with respect to pension fund holding that in a proceeding to recover taxes from a nonbankrupt taxpayer the taxpayer has the burden of proving that his taxes complied with the internal revenue code