mental state is not involved in establishing whether they abused the younger child, G.D., or failed to prevent abuse in such a way that would require termination of their parental rights as to G.D. There are no allegations that either parent has a mental disability or condition that would cause them to either shake the baby or prevent such conduct. However, the parents’ mental state may be at issue in establishing whether to terminate the parental righ parent has a mental or emotional condition that will continue, such as mental illness, drug addiction, or pedophilia, and which will make it highly probable that in the future the parent will abuse or neglect another child.” C.M., 844 So.2d at 766; see also Gaines v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 711 So.2d 190, 193 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (<HOLDING>). Thus, when the Department seeks to terminate
holding that plaintiffs must present evidence that the state actor knows or suspects that the  foster parents with whom a child is placed are likely to abuse the child to show deliberate indifference recognizing that at common law a parents liability to support his child terminated at the parents death the terms of the support order could not be enforced against his estate unless provisions allowing for such enforcement were included in the order holding that foster parents have standing to intervene to seek termination of parental rights holding that in order to support a termination of parental rights based on prospective abuse it is necessary to show that the behavior of the parent was beyond the parents control likely to continue and placed the child at risk and citing as an example the parents mental illness recognizing that the department is required to present clear and convincing evidence to support termination of a parents parental rights