character in order to show that on a particular occasion the- person -acted in accordance with the character.” This Court reviews a ruling that evidence was admitted consistent with Federal Rules of Evidence 404(b) and 403 for abuse of discretion. United States v. Moon, 802 F.3d 135, 144 (1st Cir.2015). “Only rarely — and in extraordinarily compelling circumstances — will we, from the vista of a cold appellate record, reverse a district court’s on-the-spot judgment concerning the relative weighing of probative value and unfair effect.” United States v. Bayard, 642 F.3d 59, 63 (1st Cir.2011). tinder Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b), evidence of previous crimes or acts may be admitted for the purpose of “proving motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, p 0 (5th Cir.2011) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>). ; At trial, the district court permitted A.L.
holding that evidence the victim tried to keep defendant from fleeing the scene of a crime and defendant killed victim in order to escape supported the finding that murder was committed to avoid arrest holding on a criminal appeal that prior bad acts evidence is admissible to prove intent to commit the charged crime holding evidence that defendant prostituted another female a year prior to crime admissible because defendant contested his intent to prostitute the victim holding that corroborative evidence of prior specific acts of violence by victim may be admissible in selfdefense case where the defendant knew of the act holding that evidence of uncharged incest with the same victim is admissible to illustrate the relationship existing between the defendant and the victim