no economic persecution where petitioner did not present any testimony or other evidence of his income in China, his net worth at the time of the fines, or any other facts that would make it possible to evaluate his personal financial circumstances in relation to the fines imposed by the government). In the absence of such evidence we cannot conclude that the agency erred in finding that Wang failed to establish past persecution. Wang also argues that he established a well-founded fear of future persecution based on his statement that Chinese officials threatened him with “some charges.” Wang, however, failed to detail how the vague threat of “some charges” establishes that he reasonably fears persecution upon return to China. See Jian Xing Huang v. INS, 421 F.3d 125, 129 (2d Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we find no clear error in the
holding that absent solid support in the record that a fear is objectively reasonable a claim of future persecution is speculative at best holding that in the absence of solid support in the record for an appli cants assertion that she would be persecuted the bia did not err in denying asylum because her fear was speculative at best holding that in the absence of solid support in the record for an applicants assertion that she would be persecuted the bia did not err in denying asylum because her fear was speculative at best holding that absent solid support in the record for the petitioners assertion that he would be subjected to persecution in china because of his desire to have more children his fear was speculative at best holding that absent solid support in the record for the petitioners assertion that he would be persecuted his fear was speculative at best