The Hoik court’s reasoning is further strengthened by the fact that since Teco filed the underlying suit in 1996, the Texas Legislature has corrected the error by renumbering the TGAA. Section 171.022 is now designated § 173.002 of the Texas Civil Practice <& Remedies Code. See Act of June 14, 1995, 74 th Leg., R.S., ch. 588, § 1, 1995 Tex. Gen. Laws 3409, added by Act of May 21, 1997, 75th Leg., R.S., ch. 165, § 5.03, 1997 Tex. Gen. Laws 349. Chapter 173 of the Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code specifically and expressly applies to controversies between certain nonprofit entities. See Tex. Crv. PRAC. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 173.001-173.003 (Vernon Supp.1999). Accordingly, we hold the TGAA, Chapter 171 of the Civil Practice & Remedies Code, i (Tex.App.-Amarillo 1996, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). Addressing the question of whether a
holding that in general an agencys conclusion of law that presents mixed questions of fact and law is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard but questions concerning whether an agency has followed proper procedures or considered the appropriate factors in making its determination are questions of law which are reviewed de novo holding that under the tgaa procedural questions such as compliance with conditions precedent are left to arbitrators determination holding that assuming compliance with a standard form and the absence of conflict with statute the parties to a contract of insurance are free to incorporate such provisions and conditions as they desire holding that the state as well as the defendant has a right to rely on compliance with rule 16 holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient