the M & P Silver Family Partners case, in which all of plaintiffs wells are currently contaminated; the Village of Island Lake case, in which threatened well claims are to be dismissed without prejudice, to be reinstated against non-settling defendants only if the Treatment Protocol’s triggering conditions are met (see infra fn. 78); or to the plaintiffs in the People of California case (Citrus Heights Water District, Del Paso Manor Water District, Fair Oaks Water District, Florin Resource Conserva e Village of Island Lake will not pursue recovery for wells that are not contaminated now but become contaminated in the future below the level required for payment under the Treatment Protocol. See infra n. 78. 60 . But see In re MTBE Prods. Liab. Litig., 458 F.Supp.2d 149 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (<HOLDING>). 61 . Hearing Tr. at 65:20-21 (Mr. Sher). The
holding that argument offered in defense of decision below had been waived when not raised below holding that arguments not raised below are waived for appeal holding that   1252d1 bars the consideration of bases for relief that were not raised below and of general issues that were not raised below but not of specific subsidiary legal arguments or arguments by extension that were not made below holding that the sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum holding that contamination below the mcl was an injury in fact for the purposes of standing and that summary judgment on claims for wells contaminated below the mcl was premature