we reject Chavez’s contrary interpretations of the record even though they might also be reasonable. See Broomfield, 201 F.3d at 1273. A. Retention of Chavez’s Bus Ticket If, as the Government urges, Agent Basset returned Chavez’s bus ticket immediately after questioning Chavez about his luggage and checking the ticket for luggage receipts, then Agent Basset’s brief retention of Chavez’s ticket, without more, did not transform the consensual encounter into a seizure. See United States v. Boone, 67 F.3d 76, 79 (5th Cir.1995) (hold ing that the defendant was not seized where officers at a bus station held the defendant’s ticket while asking him a series of questions, many of which concerned information from the ticket); United States v. Soto-Lopez, 995 F.2d 694, 698 (7th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); cf. United States v. Lambert, 46 F.3d 1064,
holding that the defendant had been subjected to an illegal arrest when after detectives requested and did not return his airline ticket and drivers license he was asked to come with the officers from the concourse into an interrogation room approximately 40 feet away where his suitcases were searched holding no seizure occurred when law enforcement officers returned the plane ticket and identification immediately after looking at them holding that the defendant was not seized where one officer read information from the defendants airline ticket and another officer took notes observing that the officers immediately returned the ticket after examination and did not retain the ticket for an unusual length of time holding fourth amendment not implicated when police officers asked defendant to see his airline ticket asked for identification and requested consent to search him holding fourth amendment not implicated when police officers approached defendant who was standing outside of an airport terminal and asked to see his airline ticket and identification