refusal to pay a significant portion of what it owed to ThoughtWorks. JX 66; Tr. 64. 15 . The $10 million line of credit was secured by ThoughtWorks's accounts receivable. 16 . ThoughtWorks did not seek or obtain approval from the holders of the preferred stock for the expansion of the line of credit to $5 million. 17 . SVIP thought the $10 million line of credit was excessive and well beyond what it thought was appropriate for the purposes of running the company. 18 . Tr. 54, 100-103. Goodwin testified that “the ultimate goal was to become an employee-owned and employee-controlled company.” The put right had the potential to threaten the company’s independence. 19 . JX 14 (emphasis added). 20 . Id. 21 .Id. 22 . Eagle Indus. v. DeVilbiss Health Care, 702 A.2d 1228, 1232 (Del.1997) (<HOLDING>). 23 . Id. at 1232; see also Capital Mgmt. v.
holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract holding that parties can stipulate that they were both parties to a contract and thus the real parties in interest even when one party did not sign the contract holding that when a contract is unambiguous the court will enforce the plain meaning of the contract as the intention of the parties holding for purposes of contract clause analysis a statute can be said to impair a contract when it alters the reasonable expectations of the contracting parties holding that contract terms themselves will be controlling when they establish the parties common meaning so that a reasonable person in the position of either party would have no expectations inconsistent with the contract language