motion to reduce his sentence, pursuant to Amendment 706 of the Sentencing Guidelines. After careful review, we affirm. We review jurisdictional issues de novo. United States v. Lopez, 562 F.3d 1309, 1311 (11th Cir.2009). In § 3582(c)(2) proceedings, we review a district court’s conclusions about the scope of its legal authority de novo. United States v. James, 548 F.3d 983, 984 (11th Cir.2008). As an initial matter, we reject the government’s claim that because Carter’s notice of appeal was untimely, we do not have jurisdiction over this appeal. A defendant’s notice of appeal in a criminal case must be filed in the district court no later than 14 days after the challenged order is entered. Fed.R.App.P. 4(b)(1)(A); see United States v. Fair, 326 F.3d 1317, 1318 (11th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). Unlike civil appeal rules, the deadline in
holding that proceedings under  3582c2 do not constitute a full resentencing of the defendant holding that  3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to  3582c2 proceedings holding that booker and kimbrough do not apply at resentencing proceedings under  3582c2 holding that the rules governing criminal cases apply to  3582c2 proceedings holding discovery rules apply to civil forfeiture proceedings