to engage in some rescue and recovery effort, and if such an effort were to occur immediately downstream from a lock, then some not-insignificant interruption of commercial activity might result. This potential inter ruption is sufficient to satisfy the first part of the “connection test.” The second enquiry in the “connection test” requires examination of whether the tortfeasor’s activity was substantially related to traditional maritime activity. See Grubart, 513 U.S. at 539, 115 S.Ct. 1043. There can be no reasonable dispute that the operation of a lock is a traditional maritime activity. See, e.g., Marine Transit Corp. v. Dreyfus, 284 U.S. 263, 52 S.Ct. 166, 76 L.Ed. 282 (1932) (vessel sank while approaching a lock); The Montello, 20 Wall. 430, 87 U.S. 430, 22 L.Ed. 391 (1874) (<HOLDING>). Both the location and connection requirements
holding that wetlands adjacent to navigable waters are included in the term territorial waters holding that waters in utah are of two classes private and public and title to public waters is in the public all are equal owners that is have coequal rights therein holding that private property in beds and shores of navigable streams is subject to the exercise of the public right of navigation recognizing the importance of public welfare and conservation of water in administering its public waters recognizing that locks dams and canals allow navigation of otherwise unnavigable waters