both times, stepped off the line twice during the first test and once during the second test, used his arms for balance during both tests, missed the heel-to-toe connection three times during the first test, turned incorrectly during both tests, and took twelve incorrect steps during the first test and sixteen incorrect steps during the second test. According to Silman’s report, Bullock “started urinating on himself’ at the completion of the standardized tests, after which Silman arrested him and transported him to “central intox.” We conclude that thirty-five minutes was not an unreasonable amount of time to spend on questioning Bullock and administrating six field sobriety tests, as described in Officer Silman’s report. See Balentine v. State, 71 S.W.3d 763, 771 (Tex.Crim.App.2002) (<HOLDING>); Josey v. State, 981 S.W.2d 831, 845
holding investigative detention occurred when officer after initial inquiry exited vehicle and approached defendant because officer chose to escalate the encounter to afford greater investigation which of course is consistent with the purpose of an investigative detention holding investigative detention of thirty to sixty minutes reasonable for questioning holding police violated edwards when they continued questioning a defendant after his initial invocation of the right to counsel even though he responded to the subsequent questioning holding thirty day detention beyond the expiration of a sentence constitutes a deprivation of due process holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention