it. However, nothing in the record indicates that the order was filed with the clerk of court. The order is devoid of any stamp-file or other marking necessary to indicate a filing date, and therefore it was not entered. See Huebner v. Triangle Research Collaborative, 193 N.C. App. 420, 422, 667 S.E.2d 309, 310 (2008) (asserting that a filing date is to be determined by the date indicated on the file-stamp); see also Watson, 211 N.C. App. at 373, 712 S.E.2d at 157 (standing for the proposition that a signed and dated order is insufficient to be considered filed). Because the order was not filed, it was not entered. Accordingly, the time period to file notice of appeal of clerk Hinshaw’s order has not yet commenced. See Darcy v. Osborne, 101 N.C. App. 546, 549, 400 S.E.2d 95, 96 (1991) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, because clerk Hinshaw’s
holding that designation is neither a sentence nor a punishment holding that the court neither weighs the evidence nor substitutes its own judgment for that of the agency holding that trial court erroneously entered judgment pursuant to a theory which was neither pleaded nor tried by acquiescence or otherwise holding that where judgment was not entered the appeals period neither triggered nor expired holding that findings of fact and legal conclusions are neither necessary nor proper in summary judgment proceeding