conduct constitutes sexual harassment only if it is unwelcome. We therefore do not need to decide whether Jurgens's assertion is correct; we assume for the purposes of this appeal that the code requires a finding of unwel-comeness, regardless of the type of conduct in which Jurgens engaged. 23 . Jurgens denied making such a statement, although he admitted that because of his drinking that night he could not remember exactly what he had said to Streeter. 24 . Lindhag; 123 P.3d at 952 (quoting Robinson v. Municipality of Anchorage, 69 P.3d 489, 493 (Alaska 2003)). 25 . Lindhag v. State, Dep't of Natural Res., 123 P.3d 948, 952 (Alaska 2005) (quoting Bradbury v. Chugach Elec. Ass'n, 71 P.3d 901, 905 (Alaska 2003)). 26 . Cf. Wagner v. Stuckagain Heights, 926 P.2d 456, 459 (Alaska 1996) (<HOLDING>). 27 . See Romulus v. Anchorage Sch. Dist., 910
holding that appellant waived issue by failing to raise it in opening brief holding that the defendant waived argument on appeal by failing to develop a cogent argument holding that party waived argument by failing to brief it on appeal holding that the defendant waived an argument by failing to raise it in his appellants brief holding that appellant waived argument by failing to raise argument before workers compensation board and failing to list or brief issue in administrative appeal to superior court