above all other interests the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home,’ ” id. at 25 n. 17 (quoting Heller, 554 U.S. at 635, 128 S.Ct. 2783). Further, “[w]e think it sufficient to conclude, as did the Seventh Circuit, that a categorical ban on gun ownership by a class of individuals must be supported by some form of ‘strong showing,’ necessitating a substantial relationship between the restriction and an important governmental objective.” Id. at 25 (quoting Skoien, 614 F.3d at 641). In 2010, the Supreme Court made clear that the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms applies to the states as well as to the federal government. McDonald v. City of Chicago, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3020, 3050, 177 L.Ed.2d 894 (2010) (Alito, J., plurality opinion) (<HOLDING>). “In so doing, however, the McDonald Court
holding the sixth amendment applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment holding that the fourteenth amendment incorporated the sixth amendment right to counsel holding second amendment right is incorporated against the states through fourteenth amendment holding the sixth amendment right to a jury trial applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment holding that the second amendment fully applies to state and local regulation through the fourteenth amendment