Tax Foreclosure Act to provide that under certain circumstances the owner of a single-family residence, title to which derives from a defective tax foreclosure, could obtain the outstanding interest of a previously-unknown owner. N.J.S.A. 54:5-104.100 to -104.103. Three years later, in response to an unreported Appellate Division decision that sought to limit Bron to its facts, the Legislature further amended the tax-sale law by amending N.J.S.A. 54:5-89.1. Thus, the statute prohibits anyone from becoming a party to a tax-foreclosure proceeding or from exercising the right to redeem if that person has acquired for a nominal consideration an interest in the property after the filing of a tax-foreclosure complaint. See Walter v. Sand, 191 N.J.Super. 362, 369, 466 A.2d 986 (App.Div.1983) (<HOLDING>). In an unusually emphatic statement
holding that magistrate judge had jurisdiction to enter default judgment in an in rem forfeiture action even though property owner had not consented to it because 28 usc  636c1 only requires the consent of the parties and the property owner having failed to comply with the applicable filing requirements was not a party holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that adjacent property owner had bona fide interest in becoming owner of subject property and that she could redeem taxsale certificate on it because she had acquired her interest albeit for a nominal consideration before filing of taxforeclosure complaint holding that the owner of an equitable interest in property in the form of a land contract can grant a mortgage on that interest under ohio law holding that one who acquires legal title with notice of a prior equitable interest in the property is not a bona fide purchaser