was denied. Colo. RPC 8.4(h) provides that "[it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to engage in any other conduct that adversely reflects on the lawyer's fitness to practice law." A violation of Colo. RPC 8A(h) requires proof of conduct, the totality of which establishes that the lawyer engaged in conduct which reflects that he or she lacks the personal or professional moral and/or ethical qualifications required of those authorized to practice law. Conduct involving violence, lack of honesty, violation of trust, serious interference with the administration of justice, criminal endeavors, or comparable misconduct is required to establish a violation of Colo. RPC 84(h). See People v. Egbune, No. GC98A13, slip op. at 10 (PDJ Colo.1999), 28 Colo. Law. 132, 134 (September, 1999)(<HOLDING>); People v. Theodore, 926 P.2d 1237, 1242-43
holding that court must examine totality of circumstances to determine whether substantial evidence supports issuance of search warrant holding that parties intent to create or extend agency relationship may be inferred from their conduct viewed in light of all circumstances surrounding transaction holding that the attorneys conduct must be viewed in light of the totality of the cireumstances to determine whether that conduct constitutes a violation of colo rpc 8ah holding that the jury must determine whether the partys conduct was reasonable under the cireumstances holding that a totality of the circumstances review applies to determining whether police conduct constitutes a seizure