OR MISPLACEMENTS IN YOUR ADVERTISING SHALL NOT EXCEED THE AMOUNT OF THE CHARGES FOR THE ADVERTISING IN WHICH THE ERROR, OMISSION OR MISPLACEMENT OCCURRED. OUR LIABILITY SHALL BE DISCHARGED BY ABATEMENT OF ALL ADVERTISING CHARGES FOR ANY COMPLETE OMISSION, OR BY REDUCTION OF YOUR CHARGES FOR ANY ERROR OR MISPLACEMENT IN PROPORTION TO ANY REDUCTION OF VALUE OF THE ADVERTISING DUE TO THE ERROR OR MISPLACEMENT. (Capitalization in original). Limitations of liability clauses such as the one contained in Paragraph 10 of the Advertising Orders are enforceable under Georgia law unless the defendants’ conduct gives rise to a tort claim for gross negligence or wanton or willful conduct. See Elliott Irrigation v. L.M. Berry & Co., No. 1:03-CV-2776, 2005 WL 628128 at * 2 (N.D.Ga. March 14, 2005) (<HOLDING>); cf. Swyters v. Motorola Employees Credit
holding that an identical or nearly identical limitation of liability clause was valid and enforceable under georgia law holding that an order was final for these identical reasons holding identical symptoms justified search holding that limitation of liability clause was unambiguous holding same under virtually identical circumstances