562; In re Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., -S.W.3d at-, 2013 WL 5470089, at *6; Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839. 7 . See Del.Code Ann. tit. 8, § 141(a) (West 2014); Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839; Spiegel v. Buntrock, 571 A.2d 767, 773 (Del.1990). 8 . See Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 840; Spiegel v. Buntrock, 571 A.2d 767, 773 (Del.1990). 9 . See Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 840; Spiegel, 571 A.2d at 773. 10 . See Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 840; Spiegel, 571 A.2d at 773. 11 . See Spiegel, 571 A.2d at 773. 12 . See id. 13 . See id. 14 . See Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 840; Spiegel, 571 A.2d at 773. 15 . See Spiegel, 571 A.2d at 773. 16 . Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. Fox, 464 U.S. 523, 530, 104 S.Ct. 831, 835, 78 L.Ed.2d 645 (1984). 17 . Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. denied) (stating WL 5470089, at *6 (<HOLDING>); Connolly, 257 S.W.3d at 839 (holding Texas
holding that under alabama law the law of the forum applies to procedural matters and that in most instances the statute of limitations is considered to be a procedural rule holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied recognizing rule that state law governs the substance of claims in bankruptcy proceedings holding texas law governs procedural matters holding texas law governs the procedural matter of preservationoferror requirements even if another jurisdictions law governs substantive issues