not actu al commission of, an underlying crime; it does not stand for the proposition that the specific underlying crime is not among the essential elements of any offense that generically refers to the commission of a “crime” or “felony.” Accordingly, because HRS § 134-6(a) requires the actual commission of an underlying felony, the Robins holding is inapposite. In People v. Miles, supra, on the other hand, the Appellate Court of Illinois dealt with a statute that required the actual commission of an underlying felony and that is strikingly similar to HRS § 134-6(a). The offense at issue in Miles was armed violence, which was defined as follows: Armed violence—Elements of the offense. A person commits armed violence when, while armed with a dangerous weapon, he commit Crim.App.1979) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 453 U.S. 913, 101 S.Ct. 3146,
holding that an indictment charging one offense during the commission of another crime need not allege the elements of the latter offense holding that a found in indictment need not allege all of the elements of entry holding that an offense is factually lesser included if the charging instrument alleges that the means used to commit the crime charged include all of the elements of the alleged lesser included offense holding that counsel was not ineffective in failing to request a charge on the lesserincluded offense when the evidence showed either the commission of the completed offense as charged or the commission of no offense such that the defendant was not entitled to a charge on the lesser offense holding that an indictment gave sufficient notice when the indictment charged the elements of the offense