tried to recreate what work had been done and when it had been done. The Court reduced the fees by $4,000.00. It also became apparent at the hearing that the funds available from the sale of the lake lot will not be adequate to pay the Chapter 7 administrative expenses, the fees due which have been awarded to Dr. Meyer’s dissolution counsel, the fees which have been awarded to Dr. Meyer’s accountant, and the reduced interim fees awarded to Mr. Desselle. The Court, therefore, ordered Mr. Desselle to pay over to the Chapter 7 trustee the $9,656 585-87 (D.Mass.1992) (after finding that the failure to provide detailed records warrants reduction or disallowance of fees, the court reduced a deficient interim fee application by forty-two percent); In re Land, 138 B.R. 66, 71 (D.Neb.1992) (<HOLDING>); In re Cascade Oil Co., Inc., 126 B.R. 99, 105
holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in striking fact statements that did not comply with the local rules holding it was not an abuse of discretion to deny funds holding the court has discretion to deny compensation to an attorney who does not comply with the code and bankruptcy rules and submits a fee application without sufficient specificity recognizing that the district court has discretion to admit or deny motive evidence holding not an abuse of discretion to deny funds