and critically, neither the IJ nor the BIA took into account with regard to the credibility finding testimony by Dr. Kuck that Cordova showed signs of cognitive compromise that had affected his memory and his ability to understand and answer questions without prompting and redirection. Here, Dr. Kuck’s testimony indicates that Cordova’s single confusion about one date could have resulted from either a momentary loss of memory or a misunderstanding of the question. Neither explanation suggested by the expert testimony concerning Cordova’s cognitive impairment was considered by the IJ or BIA in making the adverse credibility finding. The agency thus failed to take Cordova’s individual circumstances into account in making its credibility finding, and thereby erred. See id. at 1041 (<HOLDING>). 2. The agency also erred by failing to take
holding that the real id act does not restore jurisdiction over discretionary determinations holding that an adverse credibility determination under the real id act must take into account the totality of the circumstances and all relevant factors holding that credibility determinations are for the jury holding that adverse credibility determinations under the real id act must take into consideration the individual circumstances of the applicant holding that the real id act leaves this court deprived of jurisdiction to review discretionary and factual determinations