part and deferred in part. Discussion I. The Court Has Jurisdiction Over Plaintiffs Claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(3) provides that this Court “shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for—... (3) embargoes or other quantitative restrictions on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the protection of the public health or safety[.]” The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and this Court have repeatedly held that challenges to CITA’s actions may properly trigger § 1581(i) jurisdiction in certain circumstances. See Am. Ass’n of Exps. & Imps.-Textile & Apparel Group v. United States, 751 F.2d 1239, 1244-46 (Fed.Cir.1985) (“AAEI-TAG II”) (<HOLDING>); Fieldston Clothes, Inc. v. United States, 19
holding that district court had jurisdiction to consider claims under the all writs act holding that juvenile court has no jurisdiction to consider constitutional claims holding that this court has jurisdiction pursuant to  1581 i to consider claims involving citas administration of quotas holding that this court has jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals in cases involving a sentence of life imprisonment or death holding that this court can consider claims not specifically excluded by a coa