is still stringently and coercively implementing the one-child policy. Jiang claims that he and his wife will be the targets of sterilization and that one of them will definitely be forcibly taken for a sterilization procedure if they are returned to China. Jiang also asserts in his brief that individuals who are repatriated back to China by a foreign country are severely tortured by detention officers. As the government correctly notes in its brief, Jiang never raised his fear of forced sterilization or persecution for illegal departure before the IJ or the BIA. As a result, Jiang is precluded from bringing these issues for the first time before this Court. See Foster v. INS, 376 F.3d 75, 78 (2d Cir.2004); cf. Lin Zhong v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 461 F.3d 101, 116 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Jiang has not meaningfully challenged the I
holding that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional holding that issue exhaustion is mandatory even if not a statutory jurisdictional requirement holding that exhaustion of issues is waived if not raised by the government holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived holding that issue exhaustion is not jurisdictional and thus waived if not raised by the government