a motion for oral hearing concerning the motion to transfer venue. Despite being requested by Relators to do so, to date, the trial court has failed to issue a ruling on either motion. Relators now seek from this Court the issuance of a writ of mandamus ordering the trial court to set an oral hearing on Relators’ pending motion to transfer venue and to allow the Relator, James Craig Guetersloh, Trustee of the 1984 Guetersloh Trust, to appear in the underlying proceeding on a pro se basis. I. Trustee’s Right to Self-Representation The general rule in Texas (and elsewhere) has long been that “the term ‘trust’ refers not to a separate legal entity but rather to the fiduciary relationship governing the trustee with respect to the trust property.” Huie v. DeShazo, .App.-Waco 2006, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Although we have not been cited to, nor have
holding that a nonattorney may not appear pro se on behalf of a corporation holding a person who is not a member of the bar of any court  may appear pro se but is not qualified to appear in the district court or in this court as counsel for others holding that a nonattorney may not appear pro se in his capacity as independent executor of an estate holding that class representatives cannot appear pro se holding a court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant notice and an opportunity to respond