party may object to a magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report addressing a motion or matter described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) or making a recommendation for the disposition of a prisoner case or a habeas corpus petition within ten (10) days after being served with a copy thereof. Such party shall file with the clerk of court, and serve on the magistrate judge and all parties, written objections which shall specifically identify the portions of the proposed findings, recommendations or report to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. The briefing requirements set forth in Local Rule 72.2 shall apply. A judge shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to whi .1998) (<HOLDING>). The court has reviewed the magistrate judge’s
holding that district court error was not clear error in denying petition for mandamus holding that a partys failure to raise objections to the report and recommendation waives the partys right to review in the district court holding that district courts adoption of the magistrate judges report and recommendation one day after issuance did not constitute reversible error where district court conducted a meaningful review of the report and recommendation holding that the court will review the report and recommendation for clear error holding that we review for clear error the bankruptcy courts factual findings