that "[a] conspiracy and its target crimes are separate offenses” for the purposes of § 924(c) and thus "could each support a separate § 924(c) conviction and sentence”). 9 .Although Perry’s statement of the case states that "Perry appeals his conviction and sentence on all counts of the indictment,” his issue statement and arguments relate only to his conviction on the conspiracy count. While some of.the other counts are predicated on the conspiracy count, Perry does not identify which counts should fail if the conspiracy count were to fail. Because Perry has not addressed these other counts on appeal, he has waived any argument as to the sufficiency of the evidence on them. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(a)(8)(A); see also United States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251, 254-55 (5th Cir. 2010) (<HOLDING>). 10 . Boyer also separately appeals the
holding argument waived for failure to raise it in opening brief holding it is a wellestablished rule that grounds of error not asserted by points of error or argument in the court of appeals are waived holding that the appellant waived an argument listed only in his summary of the argument holding that appellant who merely listed  points of error without further argument or explanation had waived those issues for failure to brief holding that the appellant waived this argument