assistance resources within the SMC’s [area of responsibility] ... and shall direct those resources that the SMC believes are needed to the scene of a vessel in distress.” Coast Guard Addendum § 4.2.7.1. Commercial providers are an assistance resource. Id. at § 4.2.3.3. However, the National SAR manual and the Addendum do not define a standard of care owing to the public. See, e.g., In re American Oil Co., 417 F.2d 164, 170 (5th Cir.1969); Daley, 499 F.Supp. at 1010. TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge (Concurring in part, Dissenting in part). I agree with the remand of the plaintiffs claim against the Coast Guard for interference with communications between the commercial salvor and NORTHERN VOYAGER. I respectfully disagree, however, with the majority’s r tes, 800 F.2d 1187, 1196 (D.C.Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); Bimbaum v. United States, 588 F.2d 319, 329
holding that the discretionary function does not apply where the decisionmaker lacks authority holding immunity from liability is not jurisdictional holding that authority with which the  1983 defendant is clothed may be actual or apparent holding that even if partys decision to settle was improvident in hindsight the decision is made and cannot be revisited holding that a decision cannot be shielded from liability if the decisionmaker is acting without actual authority