under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, section 2a(15) (former 11 U.S.C. § 11a(15)), which provided that only the District Court, not the bankruptcy court, could enjoin a court. Section 105(a), through the elimination of the restriction contained in the prior law, strongly suggests that Congress intended that a bankruptcy court could enjoin another tribunal when appropriate. Indeed, if the Commission has not previously been enjoined by a bankruptcy court, numerous other administrative agencies have been. See, e.g., NLRB v. Superior Forwarding, Inc., 762 F.2d 695, 699 (8th Cir.1985) (affirming bankruptcy court’s injunction against NLRB); In re Hunt, 93 B.R. 484, 491-98 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1988) (enjoining Commodities Futures Trading Commission); In re Bulldog Trucking, In ankr.N.D.Cal.1987) (<HOLDING>). The court thus concludes that it may enjoin
holding that bankruptcy court could not enjoin third party tort claims that would not affect estate holding that creditor lacked appellate standing to appeal order of bankruptcy court absent permission of bankruptcy court holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin federal administrative proceedings when they threaten the debtors estate holding that bankruptcy court may enjoin state environmental reclamation order holding that the state court may adjudicate the applicability of a bankruptcy injunction to state court litigation