to professional compensation would make the language of Sections 503(b)(2) superfluous. Congress enacted Sections 327, 330(a), and 503(b)(2) to provide the exclusive method for a debtor’s retention of professionals, subject to numerous safeguards, including the requirement of disinterestedness. A court should not circumvent the limitations placed on retention of professionals by compensating a disqualified professional under Section 503(b)(1)(A). Instead, Section (b)(1)(A) is properly applicable only to authorize priority treatment of non-professional employee claims, including wages, salaries and commissions. The remaining issue is whether the services rendered by Harold Zell were professional in nature, in which case his administrative claim cannot be allowed, or w E.D.N.C.1985) (<HOLDING>); Matter of Seatrain Lines, Inc., 13 B.R. 980
holding that a lottery ticket purchased prepetition that won postpetition was included in the debtor estate holding that management consultant hired prepetition and retained postpetition was professional requiring appointment nonsalaried employee could not be compensated under section 327a or b holding that a subcontract agreement could not circumvent the requirements of section 327a holding that a postpetition claim under section 1305 is a liability that arises postpetition and relates only to postpetition activity holding that creditors cannot allow postpetition funds to be automatically applied to a prepetition indebtedness absent some positive indication that debtors indeed intend to voluntarily assume their prepetition debts