jury, are so closely related to the ultimate fact to be presumed that no rational jury could find those facts without also finding that ultimate fact, making those findings is functionally equivalent to finding the element required to be presumed. Carella, 491 U.S. at 271,109 S.Ct. at 2423-24 0quoted in Sullivan, 508 U.S. at 281, 113 S.Ct. at 2082); see United States v. Maloney, 71 F.3d 645, 658 (7th Cir.1995) (noting that, although instruction permitted the jury to infer the existence of a judicial proceeding, under the facts of the case, such a finding was so closely related to the finding of obstruction of justice as to render the error harmless), petition for cert, filed, 65 U.S.L.W. 3085 (U.S. July 12, 1996) (No. 96-73); United States v. Parmelee, 42 F.3d 387, 394-95 (7th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 63, 133
holding that the ins must adhere to the requirements of 8 cfr  24210 which governs the manner in which an alien must be informed of right to counsel at a deportation hearing holding that instruction that defendant must have knowingly transported illegal alien sufficiently informed jury that the transportation must also be willful holding that the jury instructions taken as a whole sufficiently informed the jury of the states burden of proving that the defendant specifically intended to kill the victim holding where defendant challenged jury instruction and also claimed ineffective assistance of counsel based upon his counsels failure to object to instruction because we find no error in the instructions defendants claim for ineffective assistance of counsel must also be rejected holding that there was no error where one instruction did not inform the jury that in order to convict defendant of attempted murder the evidence must show that defendant had a specific intent to commit murder but where subsequent instruction did inform jury of this requirement and concluding that the instructions when read as a whole adequately informed the jury of the requirement of specific intent to kill