was based rather than the sufficiency of the charging instrument. In direct appeals, an indictment passes muster if it includes the elements of the offense, provides adequate notice as to the charge, and provides protection against double jeopardy. Hamling v. United States, 418 U.S. 87, 94 S.Ct. 2887, 2907, 41 L.Ed.2d 590, reh’g denied, 419 U.S. 885, 95 S.Ct. 157, 42 L.Ed.2d 129 (1974). When an indictment is challenged for the first time on appeal, only failure to charge an offense may be asserted because all nonjurisdictional defects are waived. United States v. Campos-Asencio, 822 F.2d 506, 508 (5th Cir.1987); cf. United States v. Taylor, 814 F.2d 172, 174 (5th Cir.), reh’g denied, 818 F.2d 865, cert. denied, Taylor v. United States, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 186, 98 L.Ed.2d 138 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Generally in such cases, appellate courts
recognizing that a voluntary and understanding guilty plea entered without the benefit of a plea bargain waives all nonjurisdictional defects that occurred before the entry of the plea holding that a voluntary guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional defects in the proceedings holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense holding entry of a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional issues holding right to speedy trial is nonjurisdictional and therefore waived by voluntary and unconditional guilty plea