or (B) right to an equitable remedy for breach of performance if such breach gives rise to a right to payment, whether or not such right to an equitable remedy is reduced to judgment, fixed, contingent, matured, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, secured, or unseeured[.] The Supreme Court has indicated that in relation to bankruptcy proceedings, Congress intended “to adopt the broadest available definition of [the term] ‘claim.’ ” See Johnson v. Home State Bank, 501 U.S. 78, 83, 111 S.Ct. 2150, 115 L.Ed.2d 66 (1991). Here, then, the issue is whether Big Sky had any kind of right to payment from Mr. Ogden on account of the unauthorized disbursement of funds; if so, then Big Sky was a creditor of Mr. Ogden. While federal law determines when claim arises for bankruptcy purposes, see id. (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks omitted),
holding that the eleventh amendment does not bar a bankruptcy court from issuing a money judgment against a state under the bankruptcy code holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added holding that the bankruptcy code endows the bankruptcy trustee with the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code holding that the question of whether an interest is a claim for bankruptcy purposes is to be resolved by reference to the text history and purpose of the bankruptcy code