employed by American at Logan, seven skycaps were employed by G2 at Logan, one skycap had formerly been employed by G2 at Logan, and one skycap was employed by American in St. Louis, Missouri. 2 . The district court permitted only seven of the nine Logan skycaps to pursue both theo fies at trial. During discovery, two skycaps asserted their privilege against self-incrimination to withhold their tax records; those two skycaps were precluded from presenting evidence of damages that would have been required to make out a claim for tortious interference. The district court also made clear to the jury that no duplicative recovery would be permitted for skycaps who prevailed on both theories. 3 . See Brown v. United Air Lines, Inc., 656 F.Supp.2d 244, 249-51 (D.Mass.2009) (Gertner, J.) (<HOLDING>); Travers v. JetBlue Airways Corp., No.
holding tips law preempted holding that the plaintiffs state law claims are preempted by federal law holding the state law claims were not preempted holding that state law claim regarding breach of settlement agreement was preempted by federal labor law holding misrepresentation claim to be preempted