decisions or actions of any state administrative agency or officer, and ... the validity of any rule promulgated by such agency or officer.” R. 2:2-3(a)(2); see also Prado v. State, 186 N.J. 413, 422-23, 895 A.2d 1154 (2006). Our “jurisdiction extends not only to State agency action but also agency inaction.” Pressler and Verniero, Current N.J. Court Rules, comment 3.1 on R. 2:2-3(a)(2) (2011) (emphasis added); see also N.J. Civil Serv. Ass’n v. State, 88 N.J. 605, 612, 443 A.2d 1070 (1982). The traditional meaning of an administrative agency is “[a] governmental body with the authority to implement and administer particular legislation.” Black’s Law Dictionary 63 09); Hartz Mountain Indus., Inc. v. N.J. Sports & Exposition Auth, 369 N.J.Super. 175, 187-88, 848 A.2d 793 (App.Div.) (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 182 N.J. 147, 862 A.2d 56
holding that a determination of a new jersey spill compensation fund arbitrator is reviewable by the appellate division holding that the new jersey statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions is njsa 2a142 holding that the attorney generals decision not to provide representation to an employee is reviewable by the appellate division not by the law division where the actions against the employee are pending holding that decisions of the new jersey meadowlands commission established in but not of the department of community affairs njsa 13175a are appealable to the appellate division as of right holding that the new jersey sports and exposition authority constituted as a body corporate and politic within the department of community affairs njsa 5104a is a state agency whose decisions are initially reviewable in the appellate division