insufficient proof of venue). 23 466 U. S. 668, 687 (III) (104 SCt 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984). 24 Chapman v. State, 273 Ga. 348, 349-50 (2) (541 SE2d 634) (2001); see Strickland, 466 U. S. at 687 (III); Ashmid v. State, 316 Ga. App. 550, 556 (3) (730 SE2d 37) (2012). 25 Chapman, 273 Ga. at 350 (2); see Cammer v. Walker, 290 Ga. 251, 255 (1) (719 SE2d 437) (2011) (“A claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is judged by whether counsel rendered reasonably effective assistance, not by a standard of errorless counsel or by hindsight.” (punctuation omitted)). 26 Sowell v. State, 327 Ga. App. 532, 539 (4) (759 SE2d 602) (2014). 27 Tyner v. State, 313 Ga. App. 557, 565 (6) (b) (722 SE2d 177) (2012) (punctuationomitted); see Brewer v. State, 280 Ga. 18, 20-21 (3) (622 SE2d 348) (2005) (<HOLDING>). 28 See Court of Appeals Rule 25 (c) (2)
holding that similar allegations were insufficient to state a due process claim holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record recognizing that in order to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel a movant must show that he was prejudiced by his counsels performance holding that defendants mere allegations of ineffective assistance were insufficient to prevail on such a claim recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel