in the system, such as the danger alleged by Scott of placing the VCR and monitor in the public’s view and the danger posed by any alleged lack of panic buttons in various locations in the branch even though some of those locations had been wired for panic devices with USB’s knowledge. A trial court commits reversible error when it refuses to give a requested jury instruction which accurately states the law, if: a) there is evidence supporting the instruction; and b) the instruction was necessary to allow the jury to properly resolve all issues in the case. E.g., Cornette v. Spalding & Evenflo Cos., 608 So.2d 144, 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992); Orange County v. Piper, 523 So.2d 196, 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). Litigants have a “right to o., 231 Mich.App. 473, 586 N.W.2d 760, 762-63 (1998) (<HOLDING>); Qualitex, Inc. v. Coventry Realty Corp., 557
holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that a fire alarm system constituted an improvement to real property holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner holding that forfeiture of real property may be adjudicated before the seizure occurs because real property cannot abscond holding that the legal title holders to real property held it in constructive trust for the equitable title holder who was entitled to the real property based on an earlier contract