Inc., and therefore, had standing. Accordingly, the trial court properly denied Appellants’ motion for a directed verdict on this ground. VII. Directed Verdict on Negligence Appellants contend the trial court erred in failing to grant a directed verdict on negligence. Specifically, they maintain the existence and scope of a duty are legal questions, and no evidence was presented pertaining to duties owed by Appellants to the Association. We find this issue is not preserved for our review. Although Appellants moved for a directed verdict at the close of all testimony, they did not move for a directed verdict on the specific basis that no evidence indicated they owed a duty to the Association. Creech v. S.C. Wildlife & Marine Res. Dep’t. 328 S.C. 24, 34, 491 S.E.2d 571, 576 (1997) (<HOLDING>); see also Rule 50(a), SCRCP (“A motion for a
holding that the failure to raise an issue in the opening brief waives the issue holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review holding the appellants failure to raise a particular issue in its directed verdict motion precludes appellate review of that issue holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus waived appellate review of that issue