CURIAM. Afirmed. See State v. Luders, 768 So.2d 440, 441 (Fla.2000)
holding that an attorney is required to advise a defendant of the direct consequences of a plea and will not be found ineffective for failing to advise of collateral consequences of the plea holding that the movants assertion that he failed to advise the plea court of counsels alleged deficiencies because he blamed himself for his lack of funds was undermined by the fact that the plea court advised the movant that he had the right to appointed counsel if he could not afford to pay for counsel holding that right to effective assistance of counsel requires that defendant be advised of immigration consequences of plea holding that luders was not prejudiced by the trial courts failure to advise him of the immigration consequences of entering his plea because luders defense counsel advised him thereof and he decided to accept the risk holding that neither the trial court nor defense counsel has any duty to advise a defendant entering a plea that the plea may have sentencing enhancing consequences on a sentence imposed for a crime committed in the future