activity would be found at his home. Knights, 534 U.S. at 122, 122 S.Ct. 587. Third, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) does not violate Kyle’s Second Amendment right to bear arms. United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1114 (9th Cir.2010). Fourth, the district court properly granted an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1., which provides for a two-point increase if “the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice with respect to the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense of conviction.” U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. Kyle missed two sentencing hearings, absconded from San Diego to Los Angeles, and had a bench warrant issued that took 15 months to execute. See United States v. Petersen, 98 F.3d 502, 508 (9th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Kyle argues that his obstruction was not
holding that dismissal for failure to appear at a deposition is on the merits holding that failure to appear is also a continuing offense recognizing willful failure to appear as an essential element of the bailjumping offense holding a failure to appear for sentencing constitutes an escape under the rule holding that willful failure to appear at sentencing supported obstruction of justice enhancement