to believe that the child engaged in delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision; (3) bring the child to a detention facility designated by the juvenile court; (4) bring the child to a secure detention facility as provided by Section 51.12(j); (5) bring the child to a medical facility if the child is believed to suffer from a serious physical condition or illness that requires prompt treatment; or (6) dispose of the case under Section 52.03. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 52.02(a) (Vernon Supp.2004-05). Because Adams was a juvenile at the time of her arrest, the provisions of the family code control issues involving the appellant’s substantive rights. Roquemore v. State, 60 S.W.3d 862, 866 (Tex.Crim.App.2001) (citing Comer v. State, 776 S.W.2d 191, 196 (Tex.Crim.App.1989)(<HOLDING>)). Section 52.02(a) of the family code reads in
holding that with respect to civil forfeiture actions property issues concerning ownership are governed by the laws of the state in which the property is located holding that pleading rules are substantive holding that the rights and duties of the united states on commercial paper which it issues are governed by federal law and that in the absence of an applicable act of congress it is for the federal courts to fashion the governing rule of law according to their own standards holding that issues involving the substantive rights of pretransfer juveniles are governed by the family code holding that the admissibility of expert testimony was governed by state law