by the Act. Despite the majority’s assertion, neither has this court held that Congress overruled Sieracki for employees not covered by the Act. In fact, in Whittington, supra, we acknowledged that Sieracki still provides the warranty of seaworthiness. 541 F.2d at 433. See also Stephenson, supra, 863 F.2d at 340. Our decision in United States Lines, Inc. v. United States, 593 F.2d 570 (4th Cir.1979) says nothing more than that the 1972 Amendments overruled Sieracki — with respect to employees covered by the Act. 593 F.2d at 572; accord Drake v. Raymark Industries, Inc., 772 F.2d 1007, 1013 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom. Ray-mark Industries v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 476 U.S. 1126, 106 S.Ct. 1994, 90 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986); Aparicio v. Swan Lake, 643 F.2d 1109 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981) (<HOLDING>). The fact that Harwood is a compulsory pilot
holding that proceedings under the illinois sexually dangerous persons act were not criminal for purposes of fifth amendments prohibition of compulsory selfincrimination holding municipalities  are not persons within the meaning of the due process clause of the fifth or fourteenth amendments holding that an unconstitutional act of congress has no legal effect holding that 1972 amendments had no effect on persons not covered by the act holding that the protect act amendments to the standard of review apply retroactively