taking any medication at the time, where he had been immediately before the traffic stop, and where he was headed at the time of the stop. It shows that during this time Officer Silman observed that Bullock had a “strong” scent of alcohol on his breath, slurred speech, red and glossy eyes, an unsteady gate, and swaying balance. The report further shows that Officer Silman conducted an HGN field sobriety test on Bullock two times and that Bullock “wouldn’t follow with eyes” the first time but completed the test the second time. During these tests, Silman observed all six signs of intoxication. Silman also performed the “one leg stand” field sobriety test on Bullock twice. During these test Bullock swayed, used his arms, and dropped his foot sev See also Wilson, 2009 WL 4756562, at *2 (<HOLDING>); Dickson, 2006 WL 3523789, at *1, 3-4 (holding
holding delay of thirty to thirtyfive minutes waiting for state police to conduct dwi investigation during which time some investigation by local officer occurred did not violate fourth amendment holding twentyseven minute delay while waiting for dwi officer did not violate fourth amendment holding that delay while awaiting arrival of dwi enforcement officer even though officer who initiated the stop was qualified to perform dwi investigation was for legitimate law enforcement purposes because dwi officer brought greater expertise to scene and could complete dwi investigation more rapidly holding that legitimate law enforcement interests were served by local police officers delay while waiting for state police officer to arrive to conduct dwi investigation because state officers had more dwi experience and local officers needed to be available to respond to emergencies holding that delay while awaiting arrival of dwi enforcement officer was for legitimate law enforcement purposes because dwi officer was more experienced and could complete dwi investigation faster