fact and law for a sentence below the Guidelines range. Among other reasons, Rhodes stressed his extraordinary restitution efforts and ability to repay restitution fully if he were not incarcerated, the aber-rance of his behavior and his emotional disorders, his low risk to reoffend, as indicated by the opinion of the social worker as well as his self-employment, his bond with his daughter and the need to provide her financial support. These factors have all been recognized at one time or another as providing appropriate grounds for a below-Guidelines sentence. United States v. DeMonte, 25 F.3d 343, 346-47 (6th Cir.1994) (defendant’s voluntary restitution payments before an adjudication of guilt may justify downward departure); United States v. Madden, 515 F.3d 601, 611 (6th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Borho, 485 F.3d 904, 913
holding that the district court may consider evidence of a defendants postsentence rehabilitation and that such evidence may support a downward variance from the federal sentencing guidelines recognizing the ninth circuits aberrant behavior spectrum holding that substantial downward variance was substantively unreasonable recognizing that aberrant criminal behavior may justify downward variance holding there was no jurisdiction to review district courts discretionary refusal to depart downward on the grounds that defendants conduct constituted a single act of aberrant behavior