decision of the hearing officer. Though the Complaint requests compensatory education for the period of 2004 to 2011, this goes beyond the scope of the due process hearing, and thus the limited review that this Court is required to do. G. Weight of the Evidence In the Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges that the hearing officer failed to consider testimony offered on behalf of the Parent and improperly drew conclusions that misconstrued the testimony. Generalized complaints about the weight afforded to the evidence by the IHO is an area that the Court is reluctant to enter into. The Court was not present at the hearings, and should not reassess the credibility of witnesses that testified before the IHO. See Cabouli v. Chappaqua Cent. School Dist., 202 Fed.Appx. 519, 522 (2d Cir. 2006) (<HOLDING>). The Court declines to find that the IHO did
holding district courts should defer to hearing officers finding on the credibility and reliability of evidence of witnesses who testified before her holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility holding that circuit court should defer to supreme courts interpretation of the act holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses holding trial court free to evaluate credibility of witnesses