“They indicated to the patrol officers that responded that they were robbed at gunpoint by two subjects,” one of whom “they identified as ... Sherman Fields.” Tichenor testified to the details of the alleged crime based on what the victims said: “They indicated that they were in a car driving along with ... Fields” and an accomplice. “While driving down the street, [Fields’s accomplice] pulled out a gun, demanded money from both and the jewelry that both the two victims had with them. [He] fired a shot inside the car. Both subjects ended up giving their jewelry and money to M 40-42 (2006) (Crawford does not apply to penalty phase of capital trial); State v. Stephenson, 195 S.W.3d 574, 590-91 (Tenn.2006) (same); United States v. Johnson, 378 F.Supp.2d 1051, 1062 (N.D.Iowa 2005) (<HOLDING>); and People v. Simms, 168 Ill.2d 176, 213
holding that the right applies at capital sentencing in particular holding that crawford does not apply to sentenceselection phase of capital sentencing holding that the hearsay rule is not suspended in the sentencing phase holding that apprendi does not apply to capital sentencing schemes holding crawford does not apply to parole revocations