on an observed traffic violation and, further, that the officers had a reasonable suspicion that defendant committed a public offense. The court also ruled that the toxicology report was properly admitted at the preliminary hearing because the 1994 amendment to the Utah Constitution allows consideration of reliable hearsay at preliminary examinations. See id. The court also denied the motions.to suppress evidence. Finally, the court granted the motion to suppress defendant’s statement because defendant made the statement after the officer placed him in custody and before being informed of his right to remain silent. After the court ruled, defendant entered a conditional plea of guilty for possession of a controlled substance. See State v. Sery, 758 P.2d 935, 939 (Utah Ct.App.1988) (<HOLDING>). Defendant appeals on two grounds: (1) the
holding that a defendants guilty plea was unconditional where the guilty plea was not in writing and the government did not consent to it being conditional holding that a district court may accept a defendants guilty plea despite an absence of admission to criminal wrongdoing holding conditional plea valid when court and prosecutor accept agreedupon condition holding that conditional guilty pleas are valid when entered into in accordance with certain standards holding that a counsels oral statements at a plea hearing  that the plea being entered was conditional  did not satisfy the rule 11 writing requirement