CURIAM. We address the enforceability of an arbitration agreement in this dispute between the nursing home owner/operators and the estate of a deceased resident of the nursing home. Because the agreement contains an unenforceable' cap oh damages that goes to the “financial heart” of the agreement, we conclude that the entire agreement "is unenforceable and reverse. See Gessa v. Manor Care of Fla., 86 So.3d 484, 490-91 (Fla.2011) (<HOLDING>). The arbitration contract in this case
holding that the federal arbitration act requires piecemeal resolution when necessary to give effect to an arbitration agreement and mandates enforcement of an arbitration agreement notwithstanding the presence of other persons who are parties to the underlying dispute but not to the arbitration agreement emphasis added holding that trial court properly denied motion to compel arbitration of claims for fraud and unfair and deceptive trade practices because arbitration clause in agreement only applied to indemnification claims and there were no other arbitration clauses in agreement holding that costsplitting provision in pep boys arbitration agreement is severable from the rest of the agreement holding that limitation of liability provisions in arbitration agreement included in nursing homes admissions documents violated public policy and were not severable because they constituted financial heart of arbitration agreement holding that arbitration agreement was not unconscionable where agree ment did not limit punitive damages and limitation of liability provision was severable if unenforceable