could also be awarded as an element of actual damages if proven. The Grisham court reviewed jurisprudence and explained that attorney's fees are not awarded in cases absent a finding of wrong doing because, historically, our jurisprudence refused to consider filing or defending a case as “wrong doing,” and hence some intentional misconduct was required to support such an award. The Grisham court explained that our judicial system sought to ensure access to the courts and justice without financial barriers. 8 . Duggins v. Guardianship of Washington Through Huntley, 632 So.2d 420, 431 (Miss.1993) (The Mississippi Supreme Court cited and embraced its early comment in Andrew Jackson Life Ins. Co., 566 So.2d at 1186 n. 13.); Cont’l Cas. Co. v. Garrett, 173 Miss. 676, 161 So. 753, 755 (1935) (<HOLDING>). 9 . I note that the record on appeal fails to
recognizing recovery under common law for tort damages that are proven to be reasonably foreseeable damages of ones tortious acts holding that pecuniary damages are not property damages under insureds policy holding that tort law and the law of punitive damages are not controlled by the contract choice of law provision holding that punitive damages may be imposed against employer for tortious conduct of employee holding that no recovery exists for speculative damages