in the guidelines ...; (5) any pertinent policy statement issued by the Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 994(a)(2) that is in effect on the date the defendant is sentenced; (6) the need to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities among defendants with similar records who have been found guilty of similar conduct; and (7) the need to provide restitution to any victims of the offense. In Booker/Fanfan, the Supreme Court directed district courts to consider the Guidelines after making the findings of fact necessary to rule on any adjustments or enhancements. Further, district courts are instructed to give consideration to the Guidelines in conjunction with the factors listed in § 3553(a). See Booker/Fanfan, 125 S.Ct. at 767 (Breyer, J., joined by Rehnquist, C. (D.Utah 2005) (<HOLDING>), and United States v. Peach, 356 F.Supp.2d
holding that guidelines should be given substantial weight because they provide a presumptively reasonable sentence holding that the guidelines should be given heavy weight and that nonguideline sentences should be imposed only in unusual cases for clearly identified and persuasive reasons holding that guidelines should be accorded the same weight as each other factor listed in  3553a holding that only the two statutorily required warnings should be given holding that equal weight should be given to each factor listed in  3553a and courts must resolve conflicts between  3553 factors and guidelines