addition to any judgment awarded to a plaintiff. Id.; 43 P.S. § 260.9a(f). ¶ 17 Presently, Appellee brought suit against Crown for breach of contract and for violating the WPCL. After the trial court found a mutual mistake existed regarding Appellee’s entitlement to severance pay, it reformed the contract to include the severance payment. Thus, Crown was obligated to pay Appellee one-year’s salary as severance. Because Ap-pellee was forced to bring a breach of contract claim to collect that payment, he was entitled to recover attorneys’ fees under the WPCL. The award clearly supports the purpose of the WPCL; namely, permitting Appellee to collect the severance payment which he was owed without causing him to incur the costs associated with the collection. See Oberneder, 674 A.2d at 722 (<HOLDING>). ¶ 18 Judgment
holding that each plaintiff is liable for fees if he would have been entitled to his fees if he had prevailed holding that a plaintiff who prevailed on a 42 usc  1983 claim was entitled to an award of attorneys fees incurred on appeal holding that under the wpcl an employee who has prevailed on a claim for past wages due is entitled to attorneys fees as a matter of entitlement holding that the plaintiff who prevailed in an ipra enforcement action was entitled to an award of damages fees and costs holding that the husbands failure to argue his entitlement to attorneys fees under a prenuptial agreement at a hearing held on the issue of entitlement to attorneys fees constituted an abandonment of that claim