AND JUDGMENT JEROME A. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-Appellant Patrick Portley-El, a Colorado state prisoner appearing pro se, seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) to challenge the district court’s denial of his application for a writ of habe-as corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (the “petition”). He also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(c)(1)(A). See Montez v. McKinna, 208 F.3d 862, 868-69 (10th Cir. 2000) (<HOLDING>). For the reasons set forth below, we conclude
holding that  2253c1a applies when a state habeas petitioner proceeds under  2241 holding that order denying relief under fedrcivp 60b in a habeas setting is the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding subject to the certificate of appealability requirement of 28 usc  2253c1a 2000 holding that a  2241 petitioners claim was not cognizable under  2241 and therefore the district court lacked jurisdiction holding that district court properly dismissed claims in  2241 petition that had been decided in previous habeas action holding that  2253clas requirements apply when a state habeas petitioner is proceeding under  2241