Div. of Family & Youth Servs., 79 P.3d 50, 54 n. 14 (Alaska 2003). 18 . Tessa M. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 182 P.3d 1110, 1114 (Alaska 2008) (citing In re Adoption of A.F.M., 15 P.3d 258, 262 (Alaska 2001)). 19 . See Ben M. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 204 P.3d 1013, 1020 (Alaska 2009) (observing that an expert need not conduct an in-person interview before offering an expert opinion so long as the testimony is based on the facts of the case). 20 . See KN. v. State, 856 P.2d 468, 475 (Alaska 1993) (stating that mental illness alone may not support a CINA finding, but still finding the CINA statute satisfied because the record linked the father's "continuing mental illness with his past in .3d at 54 (<HOLDING>). 35 . AS 47.10.011(10) (emphasis added); see
holding that only one statutory basis is required to find a child in need of aid holding that a superior court can adjudicate a child as a child in need of aid based on the acts of just one parent holding an unborn child is a child for purposes of prosecuting chemical endangerment of a child holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child holding that ocs is not required to wait to intervene until a child has suffered actual harm before requesting a finding that a child is in need of aid