of a statutory right. See Spokeo, Inc. v. Robbins, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 1540, 1549, 194 L.Ed.2d 635 (2016) (“Article III standing requires a concrete injury even in the context of a statutory violation.”). 5 . Facebook’s argument against personal jurisdiction is also directed at the Cohen Complaint and raises a number of valid but vexing questions as to the interaction between New York’s statutory scheme, for extending jurisdiction over corporations and recent Supreme Court decisions concerning due process limitations on personal jurisdiction. (See MTD Mem. at 27-30.) Because the court has determined that the Cohen Plaintiffs fail to establish standing, it need not address the question of personal jurisdiction as to their Complaint. Cf. Ruhrgas AG, 526 U.S. at 583-84, 119 S.Ct. 1563 (<HOLDING>). 6 . Immediately before its service provision,
holding that subject matter questions may be but are not necessarily decided before questions of personal jurisdiction holding that constitutional questions will not be decided if case can be decided on other grounds holding that it may be decided as a matter of law holding that questions of procedure are for the arbitrator not the courts holding that unlike subject matter jurisdiction personal jurisdiction may be waived