have long recognized a countervailing and competing set of concerns with regard to handgun ownership and use in public.”). Regulations restricting public carrying are all the more compelling in a geographically small -but heavily populated urban area like the District.. See Joseph Blocher, Firearm Localism, 123 Yale L.J. 82, 108 (2013) (“American cities have traditionally had much more stringent gun control than rural areas.”). Because the District’s good reason regulation does not affect firearm possession within the home and therefore does' -not “impose! ] a substantial burden upon the core right of self-defense protected by the Second Amendment,” I believe the correct standard of review is, at most, intermediate scrutiny, Heller II, 670 F.3d at 1257; accord Woollard, 712 F.3d at 878 (<HOLDING>); Kachalsky, 701 F.3d at 96 (“Because our
recognizing longstanding outofthehomeinthehome distinction bearing directly on the level of scrutiny applicable recognizing scrutiny on statutory grounds stated in  10a and scrutiny for whether the award evinces a manifest disregard of applicable law recognizing distinction made by majority recognizing this distinction recognizing the boggs distinction