bring this action, but also lacks standing to seek voluntary dismissal. See Response. The Court notes that the cases upon which both Plaintiffs and Defendants rely involved Chapter 7 debtors, who without question lose their standing to pursue prepetition causes of action upon filing petitions for bankruptcy. See Wieburg v. GTE Southwest Inc., 272 F.3d 302, 306 (5th Cir.2001); In re MortgageAmerica Corp., 714 F.2d 1266 (6th Cir.1983); In re Raymond Const. Co. of Florida, Inc., 6 B.R. 793 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1980). The rule is different for Chapter 13 debtors, however. A Chapter 13 debtor does not lose his right to sue upon filing his petition for bankruptcy. See Olick v. Parker & Parsley Petroleum Co., 145 F.3d 513, 515-16 (2d Cir.1998); In re James, 210 B.R. 276, 278 (Bankr.S.D.Miss.1997) (<HOLDING>). Rather, a Chapter 13 debtor “retains
holding that there is no statutory authority in chapter 13 which grants a chapter 13 debtor independent standing to sue under the trustees  avoidance power holding that notwithstanding a debtors inability to obtain a chapter 13 discharge a debtor is nonetheless eligible to file a chapter 13 case holding that a chapter 13 debtor lacked standing to avoid a mortgage under  544a3 holding that a chapter 13 debtor may sue and be sued and controls whether and on what terms to settle his lawsuit holding that a chapter 13 debtor should be able to obtain a copy of his transcript in light of the broader discharge provision of chapter 13