(8th Cir.2001). And the Ninth Circuit has concluded that an individual who was released from prison into civil detention under California’s Sexually Violent Predators Act was not a “prisoner.” See Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1139-40 (9th Cir.2000). The Page court held that the PLRA applied only to individuals who “are detained as a result of being accused of, convicted of, or sentenced for criminal offenses.” Id. at 1140. The court reasoned that the detainee in that case “ceased being a ‘prisoner’ when he was released from the custody of the Department of Corrections” and that “[h]is current detention [was] not part of the punishment for his criminal conviction but rather a civil commitment for non-punitive purposes.” Id.; accord Troville v. Venz, 303 F.3d 1256, 1260 (11th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). To the extent that Jackson’s confinement must
holding that individual civilly detained as a sexually violent predator is not a  1915h prisoner because the plra applies only to persons incarcerated as punishment for a criminal conviction holding that an offender who violates section 7940115 must have a prior enumerated conviction to qualify as a sexual predator holding that when a criminal court still has jurisdiction over a defendant whose criminal record mandates the court to classify him as a sexual predator the criminal court may designate the defendant as a sexual predator even though the designation was overlooked at sentencing many years earlier holding that a conviction and sentence for a predicate offense that is entered after the commission of the current offense does not qualify as a prior felony within the meaning of the sexual predator statute recognizing criminal forfeiture as an aspect of punishment