(2010 Amendments). However, the "standard for granting summary judgment remains unchanged.” Id. 9 . Effective January 1, 2009, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a) was amended by replacing the phrase "with a disability because of the disability of such individual” with the phrase "on the basis of disability.” See Pub.L. No. 110-325, § 5(a), 122 Stat. 3557 (Sept. 25, 2008). This statutory amendment does not affect our analysis of the issues presented on appeal. 10 . The parties acknowledge that in order to prevail on his ADA discrimination claim, Mr. Watson must demonstrate some sort of "adverse” action or "adverse” effect on his employment. See EEOC Opening Br., No. 09-4207, at 49 (stating that C.R. England’s actions "adversely affected [Mr. Watson’s] status”); Watson Opening Br., No. 09-4217, at 31 (<HOLDING>); C.R. England Br., No. 09-4217, at 29 (arguing
recognizing that employment actions can be adverse even if such actions are subsequently withdrawn holding that termination is an adverse employment action holding that adverse employment actions include poor evaluations recognizing that his claim is one for discrimination based on adverse employment actions and arguing that mr watson has provided evidence that shows that defendant england discriminated against him by taking adverse job actions against him recognizing that a set of actions may constitute an adverse employment action when considered collectively even though some actions do not rise to the level of an adverse employment action individually