Division is affirmed. For affirmance — Chief Justice ZAZZALI and Justices LONG, LaVECCHIA, ALBIN, WALLACE, RIVERA-SOTO and HOENS — 7. Opposed — None. 1 The respective fathers’ parental rights were terminated previously, and the fathers are not involved in the appeal. 2 Some states have held that the proper remedy is a post-trial proceeding before the trial judge. See, e.g., In re E.D. v. State Dep't of Human Res., 777 So.2d 113, 116 (Ala.2000) (finding motion to set aside judgment "appropriate” method for raising ineffectiveness claim); L.W., supra, 812 So.2d at 557 (opting for habeas action and rejecting direct appeal on grounds appellate attorney is often trial attorney and that record is usually insufficient); In re B.P., No. 02-0422, 2002 WL 1842966 *2 (Iowa App. Aug.14, 2002)
holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that issues not properly presented to the bankruptcy court  cannot be raised  for the first time on appeal holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal holding ineffectiveness cannot be raised for first time on appeal holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal