Id. The applicant must also show a nexus between a statutorily protected ground and the feared persecution, and he can do so by presenting specific facts showing a good reason to fear that he will be “singled out” on account of the statutorily protected factor. Forgue, 401 F.3d at 1286. As an initial matter, we lack jurisdiction to consider Zambrano Diaz’s claims regarding the likelihood of future persecution due to (1) the presence of the names of he and his wife on the “Tascón List,” (2) the recent closure by President Hugo Chavez of the Venezuelan consulate, and (3) the birth of his U.S. citizen child. Zabrano Diaz failed to raise these arguments before the BIA, and, thus, they are unexhausted. See Amayar-Artunduaga v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 463 F.3d 1247, 1250 (11th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, contrary to Zambrano Diaz’s
holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider claims that have not been raised before the bia holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider claims not raised below by the alien even when the bia reviews the claim sua sponte holding that we generally may not consider issues not raised before the bia holding that we will not review an issue or claim that was not presented to the bia in the petitioners notice of appeal or brief to the bia even if the bia considered the issue or claim sua sponte holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider a claim not raised before the bia even when the bia sua sponte considers the claim