directly across from the entrance to Silkwood Estates. This will result in traffic congestion in that area. Beyond this testimony, Plaintiffs did not present any expert evidence that the level of traffic on Todd George Road would be increased to unacceptable levels. On the other hand, the JBM Traffic Study and the study performed by the City’s traffic engineer indicated that, with the improvements recommended by the studies and which were required by the zoning ordinance as a precondition to building, the level of service on Todd George Road would remain acceptable. In light of this evidence, the decision that the increase in traffic could be accommodated and should not preclude rezoning was at least fairly debatable. See Treme v. St. Louis County, 609 S.W.2d 706, 714 (Mo.App.1980) (<HOLDING>). Plaintiffs also contend that the rezoning
holding innocent purchaser contention was without merit where appellant argued it should not be subject to rezoning classification holding rezoning is at least fairly debatable where the evidence on traffic was conflicting holding that even where it is impossible to separate the causes of increases in traffic the influence of the challenged activity on increased traffic is still an important causal effect holding that on plain error review the defendants must  demonstrate that the jury would not have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendants conspired to traffic in at least  50 grams of crack holding that a traffic stop is valid under the fourth amendment if the stop is based on an observed traffic violation or if the police officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that a traffic or equipment violation has occurred or is occurring