Rivera and Guzmán asseverate that we should decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims. Docket Document No. 36. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiffs’ First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment claims are not dismissed. Accordingly, we deny Defendants’ motion to dismiss the state law claims. IV. Conclusion In accordance with the foregoing, we DENY Defendant Alejandro’s motion for summary judgment. Docket Document No. 28. We GRANT Defendants Rivera and Guzmán’s motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff Vélez’ due process claims, and otherwise DENY the motion for summary judgment. Docket Document No. 36. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . We disregard the parties' Spanish-language exhibits. Estades-Negroni v. Assoc. Corp. of N. Am., 359 F.3d 1, 2 (1st Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). 2 . A supervisor is "defined loosely to
holding that nonenglish materials submitted for review may not be considered during the pretrial process or become part of the record holding that only materials which were included in the pretrial record and that would have been admissible evidence may be considered holding the materials submitted were sufficient because the record should include all that is necessary in order for the reviewing court to accurately assess the challenged agency action holding that evidence not submitted to the district court cannot be part of the record on appeal holding that additional records submitted to the appeals council are part of the administrative record for judicial review