Commissioners must “make findings of fact in each specific case” involving an application for re-zoning approval to a PUD. § 27.3. Section 27.3 requires that the County Commissioners make findings of fact involving, inter alia, “the following matters”: (a) The report and recommendations of the [Planning Commission]. (b) Population change in the area of the proposed change. (c) Availability of public facilities in the area. (d) Present and future transportation patterns in the area. (e) Compatibility with existing and proposed development of the area including indication of neighboring sites identified by the Washington County Historic Sites Survey and subsequent revisions or updates. (f) The relationship of the proposed change to the Adopted Plan For , 535-36, 881 A.2d 1161 (2005), (<HOLDING>). We have previously addressed the question of
holding that the appellees argument was waived because they had expressly abandoned the argument before the administrative agency holding that the appellant waived this argument holding that because the appellant did not present to the administrative agency the argument it raised before this court the issue was not preserved and holding that even if preserved the argument failed holding that the appellant waived an argument listed only in his summary of the argument holding that district of columbia waived its argument that appellees were not entitled to an income tax credit by failing to assert the argument in the trial court