from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Jack B. Wein-stein, Judge), denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus which principally alleged the ineffective assistance of trial counsel. He was incarcerated following his 1994 conviction for murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. Prior to filing his federal habeas petition, Pratt moved in state court pursuant to New York Criminal Procedure Law (“CPL”) § 440.10 to vacate his conviction on the ground that the prosecution improperly withheld an investigative report constituting Rosario material but withdrew the motion shortly before the state court issued a decision. See People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286, 213 N.Y.S.2d 448, 178 N.E.2d 881 (1961) (<HOLDING>). If “properly filed” under 28 U.S.C. §
holding plaintiffs waived their right to appellate review of the admission of an experts testimony by failing to object to it at trial holding that the trial court erred in failing to address holiday visitation holding that the trial court had erred by excluding the expert testimony of a doctor holding that the trial court in a sexual assault case erred by refusing to allow evidence of prior testimony by the complainant in an unrelated rape prosecution holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses prior statements relating to their trial testimony