cannot be defeated on the basis of forum non conve-niens” when “the special venue act under which those cases are brought [is] believed to require it.” Gulf Oil, 330 U.S. at 505, 67 S.Ct. 839. Special venue acts “specifically provide[ ] where venue may be had in any suit on a cause of action arising under that statute.” Id. at 506, 67 S.Ct. 839. The Supreme Court has found that at least two special venue acts prohibited courts from dismissing cases for forum non conveniens. In the first case, Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Kepner, the Court held that Congress gave “[a] privilege of venue” to sue pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act and that “this right of action cannot be frustrated for reasons of convenience or expense.” 314 U.S. 44, 54, 62 S.Ct. 6, 86 L.Ed L.Ed. 1207 (1949) (<HOLDING>). Trotter does not recognize Piper Aircraft
recognizing that  1404a allows for the transfer of federal employers liability act suits holding that eleventh amendment bars federal suits against state courts holding that  105 allows sua sponte transfer under rule 1014a2 holding that since limitations section in internal revenue code allows for suits against a sovereign its requirements are jurisdictional holding venue provision of federal employers liability act nonwaivable