first, Susie must have a “disability”; second, Susie must be “qualified” for the job ; and third, Apple Tree’s termination of Susie must constitute an unlawful “discrimination” based on her disability. Tyndall v. National Educ. Ctrs., 31 F.3d 209, 212 (4th Cir.1994). The court shall consider each of these factors seriatim. 2. A Disability Under the ADA. The ADA defines disability as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more of an individual’s major life activities, a record of such an impairment or being regarded as having such an impairment. 42 U.S.C. § 12102(2). The court assumes for purposes of Susie’s summary judgment motion that her epilepsy constitutes a disability as defined by the ADA. See Mantelete v. Bolger, 767 F.2d 1416, 1424 (9th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>); see also Rothman v. Emory Univ., 828 F.Supp.
holding rehabilitation act applicable holding under rehabilitation act that epileptics are handicapped individuals holding that epileptic would be considered handicapped individual under rehabilitation act of 1973 even though she averaged only one daytime grand mal seizure per year and partial seizures lasting a few moments only once every two or three weeks holding that damages may be recovered under  504 of the rehabilitation act of 1973 which was considered to be closely analogous to title vi holding that standards used in section 1988 cases are applicable to determine prevailing party under section 505b of the rehabilitation act of 1973