State, the Austin Court of Appeals held that evidence that the vehicle in question was registered to a person with whom the defendant lived was sufficient to corroborate his admission that he was driving the vehicle that night. 797 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App.-Austin 1990, pet. refd). In Zavala, the Corpus Christi Court of Appeals held that evidence that the appellant was purchasing the vehicle and had taken possession of it, together with the condition of the vehicle at the time officers arrived on the scene, was sufficient to corroborate his statement. 89 S.W.3d at 137 & n. 5. Thus, we conclude that there is evidence outside of appellant’s extrajudicial confession showing that the crime of DWI was committed. Therefore, the corpus delicti rule was satisfied. See Salazar, 86 S.W.3d at 645 (<HOLDING>); Gonzales, 190 S.W.3d at 131 (holding that
holding introduction of actually coerced confession constitutes reversible error even where confession was cumulative in nature holding that the state failed to prove the corpus delicti of arson in that there was no evidence to corroborate the appellants confession establishing that the fire was caused by a criminal act holding that corpus delicti rule is satisfied if some evidence exists outside of extrajudicial confession which considered alone or in connection with confession shows that crime actually occurred holding that under elstad the first question that must be answered when determining whether a subsequent confession is tainted by an earlier confession is whether the initial confession was obtained in violation of the defendants fifth amendment rights  ie whether it was involuntary  or whether the confession was voluntary but obtained in technical violation of miranda  holding that trial judges determination of the admissibility of a confession is based on whether the confession was voluntarily given