already received some rehabilitation; he successfully completed Phase I of the SOTP. Further, in denying Sullivan’s grievance request for “immediate” enrollment in Phase II of the SOTP, the SCDC simply stated that there was no space in the program, but indicated that there was a waiting list. If room becomes available, it may even become possible for Sullivan to enroll in Phase II. In our opinion, the South Carolina Constitution does not require that the SCDC grant Sullivan enrollment in SOTP II. To interpret the constitutional mandate in Article XII, § 2, as requiring the SCDC to provide this specific program, would make the ALJD and then the judicial branch micro-managers of the prison system. See Abbeville County Sch. Dist. v. State, 335 S.C. 58, 68-69, 515 S.E.2d 535, 541 (1999) (<HOLDING>). In addition, such a holding would conflict
recognizing that under the act states are granted federal funds to provide disabled children with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment holding that a federallyfunded program in which public school teachers provided remedial education to disadvantaged children in parochial schools as well as public schools did not violate the establishment clause holding legislature was required to provide a system of free education to the public including programs for the handicapped holding that sc const art xi  3 which requires the general assembly to provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free public education guarantees only a minimally adequate education and does not call for this court to dictate what programs are to be used in this states public schools holding question of what constitutes proper care and education of children is area of public concern