claim is one way a complaint can establish the necessary indicia of reliability that a false claim was actually submitted. See, e.g., Hopper, 588 F.3d at 1326; Atkins, 470 F.3d at 1358. However, there is no per se rule that an FCA complaint must provide exact billing data or attach a representative sample claim. See Clausen, 290 F.3d at 1312 & n. 21 (listing some of the types of information that might help a plaintiff plead the submission of a claim with particularity but cautioning that Rule 9(b) “does not mandate all of this information for any of the alleged claims”); see also Durham v. Bus. Mgmt. Assocs., 847 F.2d 1505, 1512 (11th Cir.1 hand knowledge of the defendants’ billing practices is unlikely to have a sufficient basis for such an allegation. See Atkins, 470 F.3d at 1359 (<HOLDING>). Additionally, a corporate outsider likely
holding that rule 9b applies to fca holding that rule 9b was satisfied where the relator was a nurse practitioner in the defendants employ whose conversations about the defendants billing practices  with the defendants office manager formed the basis for the relators belief that claims were actually submitted to the government holding that rule 9b was not satisfied where the relator was a doctor who did not allege firsthand knowledge of the hospitals submission of false claims holding that apparel cleaners submission of false statements of their receipts a percentage of which were to be paid to the united states did not constitute false claims within the meaning of the federal false claims act holding that relators failure to meet the particularity requirements of rule 9b did not bar his claim where the relator was a former employee of the defendants and lacked access to records and documents in the possession of the defendants that contained information necessary to plead with particularity