See October 23, 2001 Magistrate Gorence Recommendation at 12. Nicholson argues that the magistrate’s reliance upon Hayward is misplaced in light of Lopez and Morrison and that Hayward should be reconsidered in light of those opinions. The court does not find such a reconsideration necessary. Section 3631’s incorporation into the Fair Housing Act as well as the legislative history in support of the legislation lends particular credence to the Thirteenth Amendment’s application. “Like the 1866 Civil Rights Act, the Fair Housing Title is an exercise of congressional power under the thirteenth amendment to eliminate the badges and incidents of slavery.” Williams v. Matthews Co., 499 F.2d 819, 825 (8th Cir.1974); see also United States v. Bledsoe, 728 F.2d 1094, 1097 (8th Cir.1984)(<HOLDING>). Slightly different wording between
holding that 18 usc  241 and 42 usc  3631 fall within a separate exception to rav holding that 18 usc  241 and 42 usc  3631 fall within separate exception to rav holding that 18 usc  245 a statute passed on the same day as 42 usc  3631 and for similar purposes constituted a valid enactment under congress thirteenth amendment authority as applied to racially motivated interference with federallyprotected rights holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983 holding that 42 usc  1982 a provision of the civil rights act of 1866 which allows victims of racial discrimination to sue private defendants was a valid exercise of congress thirteenth amendment authority