questions or issue advisory opinions." (quoting Law Project for Psychiatric Rights, Inc. v. State, 239 P.3d 1252, 1255 (Alaska 2010))); see also Larson v. State, 254 P.3d 1073, 1078 (Alaska 2011) (noting that petitioner sought "declaratory judgment without an active controversy to place it in context," which supported dismissal because "[clourts do not lightly issue advisory opinions"). 29 . Gold Country Estates Pres. Grp., Inc. v. Fairbanks N. Star Borough, 270 P.3d 787, 794-95 (Alaska 2012) (quoting Smallwood v. Cent. Peninsula Gen. Hosp., Inc., 227 P.3d 457, 461 (Alaska 2010). 30 . Ulmer, 33 P.3d at 777; Hickel v. Se. Conference, 868 P.2d 919, 928 n. 11 (Alaska 1994); Lamoureaux v. Totem Ocean Trailer Exp., Inc., 651 P.2d 839, 840 n. 1 (Alaska 1982). 31 . See Ulmer, 33 P.3d at 777 (<HOLDING>). 32 . See Hickel, 868 P.2d at 928 n. 11
holding an issue not raised to the family court is not preserved for appellate review holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees holding that consideration of a moot case was not required when there was no award of attorneys fees that would be affected by appellate review and the issue has not been preserved for appeal holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award