CURIAM. Following the March 6, 1997 stabbing death of his roommate, appellant, James Cox, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. Cox challenges both his conviction, alleging improper prosecutorial comments during closing arguments, and his 1995 guidelines sentence. We affirm Cox’s conviction without further comment, writing only to address the sentencing issue. Appellant argues that he should have been sentenced under the 1994 guidelines as the 1995 guidelines have been found unconstitutional. See Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). As correctly conceded by the State, the sentence requires reversal. See Trapp v. State, 760 So.2d 924, 928 (Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we reverse Cox’s sentence and
holding that defendant entitled to resentencing if the sentence imposed under the unconstitutional 1995 sentencing guidelines would constitute an impermissible departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines holding that only those persons whose offenses were committed on or after october 1 1995 and before may 24 1997 have standing to challenge their sentences under heggs holding that only those defendants whose offenses occurred between october 1 1995 and may 27 1997 have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the sentencing guidelines addressed by heggs holding that persons challenging a sentence imposed under the 1995 sentencing guidelines have standing to do so if the relevant criminal offense occurred on or after october 1 1995 and before may 25 1997 holding that those persons with standing to challenge their sentences under heggs were those whose offenses were committed on or after october 1 1995 and before may 24 1997