We do not agree with our colleague that the right of minors to be free from sexual attack is a newly declared one, or that it should bow to the economic concerns of charitable or educational institutions. Moreover, we note that we specifically invited the parties to address the implications of Frugis in post-argument briefs. Thus an opportunity was afforded for the delineation of those policy consequences that our colleague claims we have neglected to consider. The parties' responses did not identify or address any such consequences. 9 Other cases holding the Charitable Immunity Act constitutional do not discuss the interaction between the Charitable Immunity Act and the Child Sexual Abuse Act. Johnson v. Mountainside Hospital, 239 N.J.Super. 312, 320, 571 A.2d 318 (App.Div.1990) (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 122 N.J. 188, 584 A.2d 248
holding in a medical malpractice action without significant discussion that charitable immunity as applied to a hospital is constitutional under due process and equal protection analysis holding that discovery rule applied to wrongful death action predicated on medical malpractice holding that nurse who is familiar with the standard of care at another similar hospital can qualify by experience to testify as a medical expert in a medical malpractice action recognizing that even when a prisoner files suit under section 1983 alleging medical malpractice against prison medical officials medical malpractice does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a prisoner holding that despite a jury verdict against the insured hospital for medical malpractice liability was not beyond dispute