that additional criminal activity is afoot. Ballard, 2000 SD 134, ¶¶ 11-12, 617 N.W.2d at 841 (quoting Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 500, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1325-26, 75 L.Ed.2d 229, 238 (1983)). Accordingly, we must determine whether the totality of the circumstances gave rise to an objectively reasonable suspicion that Kenyon was guilty of an offense other than the traffic violation. [¶ 17.] Here, we are faced with a defendant who was legitimately pulled over for a traffic violation. Upon request, Kenyon was unable to produce proof of insurance. He claimed he had only recently, bought the car, yet it was filthy and full of trash. His account of his (and his passenger’s) destination changed three different times. See, e.g., United States v. Foley, 206 F.3d 802, 806 (8thCir.2000) (<HOLDING>). Kenyon’s passenger was wearing a long-sleeved
holding that nervous behavior and failure to make eye contact did not give rise to reasonable individualized suspicion holding that nervous evasive behavior is a pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion recognizing presence in a high crime area unprovoked flight and nervous evasive behavior as factors supporting a reasonable suspicion holding that nervous evasive behavior such as flight is a relevant factor in an examination of reasonable suspicion holding nervous behavior and inconsistent story justified reasonable suspicion and subsequent search