various sexual or assaultive offenses). 5 . The following is an example of an article-38.37 jury charge instruction: You are instructed that if there is any testimony before you in this case regarding the Defendant’s having committed offenses against the alleged victim other than the offense alleged against him in the Indictment in this case, you cannot consider said testimony for any purpose unless you find and believe beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant committed such other offenses, if any were committed, and even then you may only consider the same in determining the state of mind of the Defe 7.07, section 3(a) instruction: The State has introduced evidence of extraneous crimes or bad 6642 at *3 (Tex.App.-Amarillo Feb.21, 2002, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication) (<HOLDING>). In contrast, the San Antonio and Dallas
holding that trial court did not err holding that trial court did not err in failing to sua sponte provide instruction regarding extraneous offenses during guiltinnocence holding that trial courts failure to give reasonabledoubt instruction sua sponte during punishment phase for extraneous offenses offered during punishment was harmless error in part because the jury assessed punishment far below maximum available despite states plea for maximum holding trial court did not err in failing to define manufacture holding that in admitting evidence the failure of the trial court to give a limiting instruction sua sponte is not reversible error