Mr. Mulder asserts that the VA violated its Duty to Notify and Assist by failing to adequately investigate Mr. Mulder’s assertions that his sentence has been vacated. Although Mr. Mulder did inform the VA that his sentence was repeatedly vacated during his post-conviction proceedings, he never claimed — nor could he have — that his conviction had been overturned or that he had been released from custody. In fact, each of his letters to the VA originated from a correctional facility. In any event, changes in sentence do not warrant resumption of benefits under § 5313(a)(1). A veteran’s compensation reduction does not end until the incarceration ends. The VA therefore had no obligation to conduct any further investigation. See Robinson v. Shinseki 557 F.3d 1355, 1361 (Fed.Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). Conclusion We have considered the remaining
holding that a federal court may adjudicate claims for which there is no independent basis for subject matter jurisdiction if the nonjurisdictional claims are related to other claims for which the does have jurisdiction holding that the tucker acts waiver of sovereign immunity for contract claims does not extend to claims for contracts implied in law recognizing that the right does not extend to committing perjury holding that the tucker acts waiver does not extend to statutory claims holding that the vas obligation to assist and read filings in a liberal manner does not extend to claims which have no support in the record