a telephone pole that had been hit and broken approximately eight blocks away. Id. Upon returning to the veh f the road and striking something. He then accompanied Officer Garcia on a search for his car, acknowledged that the crashed vehicle belonged to him when it was found, and did not make any other statements or present any evidence challenging that acknowledgment. He was found within 300 to 400 yards from the site of his crash with an inanimate object, and the hood of his vehicle was still warm. Appellant also failed all three field sobriety tests administered to him and complained of injuries consistent with his having been struck by a deployed air bag, as he had described. In Folk v borating evidence need not prove underlying offense conclusively); Layland, 144 S.W.3d at 651 (<HOLDING>). C. Evidence That Appellant Drove While
holding that corpus delicti of dwi is that someone drove or operated motor vehicle in public place while intoxicated holding that indianas operating while intoxicated statute which states that a person who operates a vehicle while intoxicated commits a class a misdemeanor is not limited to operation of motor vehicles on public highways holding dwi intoxicated operation of a motor vehicle in a public place is clearly not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16b holding state can obtain dui conviction by proving circumstantially that defendant drove while intoxicated to place where he relinquished actual physical control of vehicle holding a felony conviction for driving while intoxicated dwi may be a crime of violence