(plaintiff failed to state a Fourteenth Amendment claim based on right to privacy in medical condition); but see Poe, 282 F.3d at 189 (defendant police officer’s conduct in secretly videotaping unclothed female volunteer for a police training video “shocks the conscience” and was “unjustifiable by any governmental interest”). Furthermore, a prisoner’s interest in keeping a particular medical condition private varies with the condition. Powell v. Schriver, 175 F.3d 107, 111 (2d Cir.1999) (citing Doe v. City of New York, 15 F.3d 264, 267 (2d Cir.1994)). This is not a case in which plaintiff has an unusual medical problem which, if disclosed unnecessarily to other inmates, would likely expose plaintiff to discrimination, intolerance, or potential violence. See id., 175 F.3d at 111-13 (<HOLDING>); see also Webb, 117 F.Supp.2d at 298
holding that prisoners do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells holding prisoners had no clearly established right to privacy in medical records in 1995 recognizing a constitutional right of privacy in mental health records holding that prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their prison cells recognizing prisoners right to privacy in transsexuality and hivseropositive status