§ 61, Comment g (Tent.Draft No. 1, 1973).' There is no allegation that the Court of Claims was not a court of competent jurisdiction to decide the issues before it. As a court established under Article III of the Constitution (28 U.S.C. § 171), its judgments are entitled to full judicial weight. 2 . In its recent opinion in Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet, 414 U.S. 573, 94 S.Ct. 806, 39 L.Ed.2d 9 (1974), the Court held that a wrongful death action by the widow of a seaman injured as a result of the unseaworthiness of the defendant’s vessel was not merged into a judgment obtained by her husband for personal injuries that he suffered as a result of the unseaworthiness. The Court concluded: “Moragne [v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 90 S.Ct. 1772, 26 L.Ed.2d 339 (1970) (<HOLDING>)] created a true wrongful-death remedy —
recognizing cause of action for wrongful death holding that a failure to include a beneficiary in a wrongful death action is a defect because the wrongful death act restricts plaintiffs to a single action recognizing action for wrongful death based on unseaworthiness holding that passengers claims could not be based on unseaworthiness holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute