M.D., and Montgomery Hospital Medical Center. The ensuing complaint was based on alleged negligence associated with surgical procedures performed by Dr. El-Daief on Appellant’s wrist and hand in May and August 2000. The central allegation was that Dr. El-Daief negligently lacerated the radial nerve in Appellant’s wrist during one of the surgeries. Appellees sought summary judgment, invoking the governing two-year statute of limitations, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 5524(2). In response, Appellant relied on the discovery rule, which operates to toll the running of the statute of limitations for latent injuries, or injuries of unknown etiology, until the plaintiff knew or should have known she was injured by the conduct of another. See Fine, 582 Pa. at 267-68, 272-74, 870 A.2d at 858-59, 862 (<HOLDING>). The common pleas court awarded summary
holding that defendant dentists were not entitled to summary judgment in malpractice actions commenced more than two years after the relevant dental procedures where factual questions remained as to the plaintiffs diligence holding twoyear medical malpractice statute of limitations unconstitutional as applied to plaintiffs who are unable to discover their claims within two years holding under continuing wrong doctrine that plaintiffs were allowed  to pursue claims for underpayments for three years before they commenced actions holding that more than notice to a defendant is required recognizing that the plaintiffs mere assertions that the defendant had a discriminatory intent were inadequate without substantial factual evidence to raise an issue to preclude summary judgment