¶ 54. The transfer of rights to property of debtor Think3 (like the alleged transfer of Think3’s rights in the Toyota receivable through the Mandatory Prepayment Agreement) and granting of security interests may plausibly constitute “transfers” of Think3’s property that are avoidable preferences. See 11 U.S.C. § 101(54) (defining “transfer” broadly as creating a lien, or directly or indirectly disposing or parting with the debtor’s property or an interest in the debtor’s property); Cullen Center Bank & Trust v. Hensley (In re Criswell), 102 F.3d 1411, 1415 (5th Cir.1997) (definition of “transfer” for purposes of § 547 is comprehensive, broad, and includes every conceivable mode of alienating property); Cadle Co. v. Sumrall (In re Sumrall), 9 F.3d 1547 (5th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); Braunstein v. Karger (In re Melon Produce,
holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that the trustee could not avoid a security interest under section 549 when that security interest was authorized by the bankruptcy court recognizing that water rights constitute a real property interest recognizing that granting of a security interest in real property is a preference under  547 of the bankruptcy code holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code