the referee believed it was irrelevant, the referee made no inquiries about the son’s special needs or how the presence of Claimant’s domestic partner in Florida would alleviate them. 6 .For example, the majority relies on a portion of Claimant’s testimony to find that the domestic partner's main reason for leaving her job was stress. (Majority op. at 266.) While giving credence and weight to that testimony, the majority gives no credence or weight to Claimant's testimony that job stress had an adverse effect on her domestic partner’s health. (N.T. at 10.) Of course, only the UCBR can determine the credibility and weight of evidence. 7 . This court recognizes unmarried, heterosexual, single-parent families for other purposes in determining necessitous and compelling cause. See Beachem (<HOLDING>). 8 . I note that an individual may legally
holding that police chiefs son who alleged that he was denied an interview for a position because his father had criticized the local officials did not have standing to assert the first amendment rights of his father holding that son had no homestead interest in property even though he resided upon it with his fathers consent because son had neither title nor a present right to possess land nor right to demand partition from father who was his cotenant holding that a plenary hearing was necessary based upon mothers certification and school social workers report of childs behavioral problems holding that a single father who relocated to care for an elevenyearold son with emotional and behavioral problems had a necessitous and compelling reason for leaving his employment holding that transfer of insurance agency by father to his son was not a gift because sons agreement to continue fathers employment with agency was consideration for transfer