to as “the City’s customers” for retail water delivery and wastewater services. In fact, the Agreement expressly declares that it is “for the benefit of the City, the District, and NPC, its successors and assigns, and shall not be construed to confer any benefit on any other party except as expressly provided herein.” We conclude that there is nothing in the Agreement that would confer donee- or creditor-beneficiary standing upon the individual plaintiffs to seek a declaration of them rights under this Agreement. Therefore, the district court correctly determined that the individual plaintiffs lack standing to assert that section 7.2 of the Agreement violates the water code. See El Paso Cmty. Partners v. B & G/Sunrise Joint Venture, 24 S.W.3d 620, 626 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). The District’s fourth issue is overruled.
holding that nonsignatories to a contract have no rights under the contract and thus no standing to assert claims under the contract holding that for the purposes of standing to bring an action to recover on a contract privity is established by proving the defendant was a party to an enforceable contract with either the plaintiff or a party who assigned its cause of action to the plaintiff holding that parol evidence is admissible to show that an individual who signed a contract but is not named in the body is a party to the contract holding that an incidental beneficiary does not have standing to sue for breach of a contract holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract