the return of child to her parent. “Juvenile courts administering [dependency] statutes ‘act in parens patriae, focusing on family unity and the best interests of the child.’ ” State ex rel Dept. of Human Services v. W. P., 345 Or 657, 662, 202 P3d 167 (2009) (quoting State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Geist, 310 Or 176, 189, 796 P2d 1193 (1990)); see also ORS 419B.090(2)(c) (dependency statutes are to be liberally construed to protect the welfare of children within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court); ORS 419B.090(3) (“It is the policy of the State of Oregon to safeguard and promote each child’s right to safety, stability and well-being. The State of Oregon recognizes the importance of a child’s relationships with parents, siblings, grandparents and other relatives.”); ORS 419B.090(5) (<HOLDING>). In light of its role in the context of
recognizing a strong policy preference in favor of arbitration holding that the governments interest in the welfare of children embraces not only protecting children from physical abuse but also protecting childrens interest in the privacy and dignity of their homes and in the lawfully exercised authority of their parents recognizing strong preference that children live in their own homes with their own families holding that states may enforce their own laws for disabled children and are not limited to the minimum standards of the federal law recognizing that states may establish procedural rules governing litigation in their own courts