of homes is a “clear logical extension of our holding in Carty.” Post at 320, 907 A.2d at 415. 9 By measuring "respiration, pulse rate and blood pressure, and galvanic skin response," polygraph examinations are used to determine whether a person is telling the truth as that person is asked and answers questions. 31 Leonard N. Arnold, New Jersey Practice Series: Criminal Practice and Procedure § 1.41, at 59 (2005). 10 Defendant also showed "no reactions indicative of deception" when answering the following questions affirmatively: "Did the police announce 'State police — we have a search warr izing possessory interest in property sufficient to confer standing under State Constitution to challenge validity of vehicle search); State v. Johnson, 68 N.J. 349, 353-54, 346 A.2d 66 (1975) (<HOLDING>). Specifically, our consent-search
holding that defendants consent to search his person while on board an interstate bus was voluntary even though the police did not tell the defendant of his right to refuse consent holding that the mere assertion of constitutional right to refuse consent to search does not supply probable cause to search holding that police must prior to entering the home inform the person from whom consent is sought that he or she may lawfully refuse to consent to the search holding under state constitution that validity of consent search requires knowledge of right to refuse consent holding that persons knowledge of his right to refuse a consent to search is a factor but not a necessary prerequisite to demonstrating a voluntary consent