buys, and I didn’t have a source at that point that was willing to do that. So that was not an option for me. Therefore, the way I handled it was what I felt to be the only option at that point. [MUCHNICKI]: Which is the stop—stopping the van? [MYERS]: Yes. 6 . At some point during the traffic stop, Agent Myers recognized Marroquin from an earlier investigation and prosecution for passport fraud and identity theft. (Id. at 164). 7 . The Court exercises its discretion in considering Pacheco’s affidavit, but assigns it less weight than live testimony given that he did not testify at the suppression hearing, thereby denying the Government the ability to cross-examine him. See United States v. Ramos, 591 F.Supp.2d 93, 113 (D. Mass. 2008). 8 . At one point, Marroquin , 1147 (8th Cir. 2007) (<HOLDING>). 11 . Pacheco also argued that his arrest was
holding that routine booking questions do not violate the constitutional protection against self incrimination as they do not constitute interrogation holding miranda inapplicable because defendant not in custody holding that even if defendant were in custody a miranda violation would not require suppression of his fingerprints because the fifth amendments self incrimination clause offers no protection against compulsion to submit to fingerprinting quotation omitted holding that miranda violation did not require suppression of immigrants fingerprints holding that the fifth amendment did not require the suppression of the physical fruits of a miranda violation where the statement was voluntary