clearly does not support plaintiffs' proposition that one who does not use a product may succeed on a products liability claim for emotional disturbance alone. 7 . Section 436(2) reads: (2) If the actor’s conduct is negligent as creating an unreasonable risk of causing bodily harm to another otherwise than by subjecting him to fright, shock, or other similar and immediate emotional disturbance, the fact that such harm results solely from the internal operation of fright or other emotional disturbance does not protect the actor from liability. Restatement (Second) of Torts § 436(2) (1965). 8 . Restatement (Second) of Torts § 436 cmt. f (1965). 9 . Restatement (Second) of Torts § 436A cmt. a (1965). 10 . See Boyd v. Atlas Motor Inn, Inc., 16 V.I. 367, 369-71 (D.V.I.1979) (<HOLDING>). Also, under the statutory scheme, attorney's
holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against municipalities under  1988 holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under subsection 216b holding that punitive damages are recoverable in a claim for retaliation under the flsa holding punitive damages not recoverable under 2715 holding that punitive damages are not recoverable under viwda