2002. Arguelles requested a delay in the hearing date based upon the upcoming deposition, but the trial court denied that request, held the hearing on June 11, 2002, and entered a final summary judgment in favor of the City. In so ruling, the court set forth no finding of facts or conclusions of law in its summary judgment order. This appeal followed. Entry of summary judgment in this case was premature because discovery had not been completed. In UFF DAA, Inc. v. Towne Realty, Inc., 666 So.2d 199 (Fla. 5th DC A 1995), this court held that it was reversible error to enter summary judgment when relevant discovery was in progress and a deposition of a party was pending. See also Villages at Mango Key Homeowners Assoc., Inc. v. Hunter Development, Inc., 699 So.2d 337 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997)(<HOLDING>). Because Arguelles were entitled to complete
holding that summary judgment should not be granted when depositions are pending unless protective order is sought or entered holding that where parties did not respond to an issue in summary judgment motion parties relinquished any claim on the issue and conceded that summary judgment should be entered against them holding that if the evidence is merely colorable or is not significantly probative summary judgment may be granted holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that a motion for summary judgment was not opposed