asserting his rights). 45 . Sutherland v. Dardanelle Timber Co., 2006 WL 1451531, at *8 (Del.Ch.) (finding that the plaintiffs demonstrated a "credible basis” to support allegations of management entrenchment and waste); Haywood v. Ambase Corp., 2005 WL 2130614, at *5-6 (Del.Ch.) (finding "by a preponderance of the evidence, a credible basis” to support allegations of excessive executive compensati , 2004 WL 1728604, at *9 (Del.Ch.) (shareholders presented sufficient evidence to support a claim of corporate wrongdoing); Marmon v. Arbinet-Thexchange, Inc., 2004 WL 936512, at *4 (Del.Ch.) (finding a "credible basis” where there was credible testimony presented in support of the various claims of corporate wrongdoing); Khanna v. Covad Commc'ns Group, Inc., 2004 WL 187274, at *6 (Del.Ch.) (<HOLDING>); Freund v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., 2003 WL
holding that standard for revocation of probation is preponderance of the evidence holding that the proper standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence holding that trademark infringement must be demonstrated by a preponderance of the credible evidence holding that the shareholder has shown a credible basis by a preponderance of the evidence for his allegations of selfdealing with respect to a number of corporate transactions holding at trial a criminal defendant has the burden to prove his insanity by a preponderance of the evidence