133 Idaho 265, 269, 985 P.2d 1127 (1999); Lindgren v. Martin, 130 Idaho 854, 857, 949 P.2d 1061, 1064 (1997). Review of the trial judge’s decision is limited to ascertaining whether the evidence supports the findings of fact and whether the findings of fact support the conclusions of law. Conley at id. If the findings of fact are based on substantial evidence, even if the evidence is conflicting, they will not be overturned on appeal. Id. However, this Court exercises free review over questions of law. Id. III. DISCUSSION 1. We decline to review the denial of summary judgment. This Court has adopted the general rule that an order denying a motion for summary judgment is not reviewable on appeal from a final judgment. Leavitt v. Swain, 133 Idaho 624, 631, 991 P.2d 349, 356 (1999) (<HOLDING>); Watson v. Idaho Falls Consol. Hosps., Inc.,
holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable  holding that if there is any issue of fact which remains upon a motion for summary judgment the motion must be denied holding that the boards denial of a motion to reopen is reviewable by the federal courts of appeals holding that pure issue of law is preserved by motion for summary judgment and is reviewable after final judgment holding the denial of a motion for summary judgment on an issue which is later submitted to the jury is not reviewable