arts-related presentations, the City has evidenced an intent to conserve the Plaza’s function as an extension of the performing arts complex. Worth n L.Ed.2d 145 (1999). Thus, it is apparent that the Plaza’s primary function and purpose is to serve as a pleasing forecourt at the center of a prominent performing arts complex, to facilitate patrons’ passage into the events taking place in the arts buildings, and symbolically to promote the cultural arts for the benefit of the community. Although the Plaza’s design clearly invites passers-by to stroll through or linger, the Plaza was not created primarily to operate as a public artery, nor to provide an open forum for all forms of public expression. Cf. First Unitarian Church v. Salt Lake City Corp., 308 F.3d 1114, 1125-27 (10th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). Put another way, the Plaza has not
holding that a courthouse was a nonpublic forum but an unenclosed courthouse plaza was a designated public forum holding that a portion of main street sold  to church and converted into pedestrian plaza is a traditional public forum because by retaining easement for public passage city intended to encourage pedestrian traffic and to preserve and enhance the downtown pedestrian grid holding that a municipal transit vehicle is not a public forum for first amendment purposes because the city is engaged in commerce and the advertising space in question although incidental to the provision of public transportation is part of a commercial venture holding that chicagos navy pier is not a traditional public forum holding that the fremont street experience a publiclyowned commercial and entertainment pedestrian district in downtown las vegas is a traditional public forum