of defendant Stokes {id. at 132-44); and the prior trial testimony of Raymond Goldberg, owner or partial owner of 2701 Red Lion Associates and Refrigerated Foods Distribution Inc. and its predecessors. {Id. at 145-81.) Interlake had dropped all claims against co-defendants Warehouse Technology and Curti Service. At the conclusion of defendant’s case and upon motion by the plaintiff, and after argument by counsel, I found that Interlake had failed to present sufficient evidence to support a prima facie case of negligence against any of the three co-defendants, namely Stokes, Schmidt and Red Lion, and I nonsuited Interlake on its cross-claims then. Id. at 182,193. Accordingly, the matter went to the jury solely on the question of damages. 545 Pa. 209, 216, 680 A.2d 1145, 1149 (1996) (<HOLDING>); Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa.
holding that superior courts erred in granting judgment nov on a wrongful death claim and remanding for new trial on that claim and on damages holding that the superior courts erred to the extent that it allowed a new trial on a lung cancer claim and affirming the grant of a new trial limited to noncancer injury claims holding that superior court erred in reversing trial courts order granting new trial and remanding for a new trial limited to apportionment of damages holding that the trial court can and should grant a new trial if the manifest weight of the evidence is contrary to the verdict holding that to grant a new trial the error must be more than harmless