CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Wright v. State, 636 So.2d 534 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (<HOLDING>). MONACO, LAWSON, and COHEN, JJ.,
holding that although the trial courts failure to determine amount of fees does not render underlying order nonfinal the fee award itself is not reviewable until the amount is determined holding that a defendant who does not receive concurrent sentences on multiple charges  is not entitled to have his jail time credit pyramided by being given credit on each sentence for the full time he spends in jail awaiting disposition he is only entitled to jail credit on the first of the consecutive sentences quoting daniels v state 491 so2d 543 545 fla1986 holding that state courts failure to discuss or even to be aware of federal precedent does not in itself render the decision contrary to federal law recognizing failure to award equitable credit pursuant to fraser v state 602 so2d 1299 fla1992 does not render a sentence illegal recognizing statutory credit