debtor’s situation, the Court is without authority, either statutory or equitable, to grant the debtor’s request to revoke the discharge under the facts presented. The Bankruptcy Code contains no provision that would allow the Court to revoke the debt- or’s discharge at his behest. Section 727(d) of the Code, 11 U.S.C. section 727(d), provides for revocation of discharge, upon proof of specified conditions, but only at the request of the trustee, a creditor or the United States trustee. “[T]he provisions of § 727(d) are exclusive,” In re Calabretta, 68 B.R. 861, 863 (Bankr.D.Conn.1987), and provide “no basis ... for inferring a statutory right by the debtor to seek a revocation of a discharge once granted by the court.” Id. See also In re Leiter, 109 B.R. 922, 925 (Bankr.N.D.Ind.1990) (<HOLDING>). Nor do the Court’s equitable powers permit
holding that chapter 13 debtor lacked standing under 11 usc  548 but finding limited authority for the debtor to avoid a transfer under 11 usc  522h holding that the definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113aa does not operate to extend the antimodification provision of 11 usc  1322b to structures that are not real property holding that a confirmed chapter 13 plan is binding on all parties under 11 usc  1327a however the plan may be modified pursuant to 11 usc  1329 holding that the language of 11 usc section 727d is unequivocal holding that a state is immune by virtue of 11 usc  106c from money damages for violating the automatic stay provision of 11 usc  362a