also United, States v. Gama-Bastidas, 142 F.3d 1233, 1239 (10th Cir.1998); United States v. Shareef, 100 F.3d 1491, 1500 (10th Cir. 1996). Our inquiry here is thus focused on whether Wilson’s detention during the course of the traffic stop was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. “A traffic stop is a ‘seizure’ within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Holt, 264 F.3d 1215, 1220 (10th Cir. on and the manner in which it is carried out,” id., keeping in mind that an officer may extend the duration and scope of the initial detention based on “an objectively reasonable and articulable suspicion that illegal activity has occurred or is occurring.” United States v. Caro, 248 F.3d 1240, 1244 (10th Cir.2001); see United States v. Jones, 44 F.3d 860, 872 (10th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). When the stop is extended based on reasonable
holding that questions on transportation of contraband must be justified by reasonable suspicion even when they do not extend the duration of the stop holding that the delay of approximately two minutes that occurred prior to the police officer developing reasonable suspicion to further investigate the defendants identity was de minimis and did not unreasonably extend the duration of the traffic stop holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop holding that reasonable suspicion that there is contraband in the vehicle justifies greater intrusion unrelated to the traffic stop holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law