truck’s engine compartment. Based on his training and experience, he knew lighter fluid and plastic bottles like the one he saw in the truck are commonly used in the making of methamphetamine. In addition, Smith became visibly nervous when asked about the truck, and, after opening the hood, he kept positioning himself as to obscure the bottle from the officer’s sight. These facts and circumstances gave Lt. Brannin probable cause to believe Smith was in the process of making methamphetamine. Cf. State v. Kennedy, 953 So.2d 655, 656-57 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (finding officer had probable cause to arrest defendant when, as he approached front door of home, officer smelled odors consistent with the manufacture of methamphetamine); State v. Casey, 528 So.2d 1264, 1265-66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (<HOLDING>). As to exigent circumstances, Lt. Bran-nin
holding that a car passenger had a legitimate expectation of privacy in his closed plastic shopping bag found on the floor of the car holding that there was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of plastic garbage bags left on or at the side of a public street holding there was insufficient evidence to prove intent to distribute where the defendant dropped a plastic bag containing loose white rocks of cocaine and there was no other indicia of the defendants intent such as the drugs being packaged in smaller baggies holding that cocaine packaged in two individually wrapped blocks in a single plastic bag supported a finding of distribution holding officers observation of plastic bag protruding from defendants pocket coupled with defendants behavior and officers knowledge that the area was commonly used for narcotic transactions and narcotics are commonly packaged in plastic bags provided sufficient probable cause to seize the plastic bag and arrest the defendant