requires probable cause under the circumstances before us, we address Bousman’s argument that chapter 810 itself requires that the order be based on probable cause. Section 810.6(2) requires a showing of “reasonable grounds to suspect that the person named or described in the application committed the felony.” Iowa Code § 810.6(2). It is well established in the area of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence that “reasonable grounds to suspect” is something less than probable cause. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883, 20 L.Ed.2d 889, 909 (1968); State v. Cline, 617 N.W.2d 277, 282 (Iowa 2000). Probable cause requires “reasonable ground[s] for belief” that the person to be arrested has committed a crime. State v. Harris, 490 N.W.2d 561, 563 (Iowa 1992) (emphasis added) (<HOLDING>); accord State v. Ceron, 573 N.W.2d 587, 592
holding that it is unreasonable to search individuals who are in the same general area as someone being searched under a valid warrant without something more to establish probable cause holding that probable cause is something more than mere suspicion holding that something more than a mere error of law is required to constitute misconduct holding something more than denial of receipt is required holding that a factual finding must be supported by more than mere surmise or suspicion