(same); Ellis v. United States, 780 F.Supp. 783, 787 (D.Utah 1991) (“It is also well established that the decision to assign safety responsibility to a contractor cannot form the basis for tort liability against the government.”). This is so even when there is an applicable non-delegable duty under state law. See Andrews, 121 F.3d at 1438-40, 1442 (finding, in spite of the government’s non-delegable duty to monitor the activities of independent contractors hired to dispose of hazardous waste under Florida law, that the Navy was free to delegate its safety responsibilities in the absence of federal legislation dictating otherwise); but see Dickerson, Inc. v. United States, 875 F.2d 1577, 1582-84 (11th Cir.1989). See also Berrien v. United States, 711 F.3d 654, 659 (6th Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>); accord Alinsky v. United States, 415 F.3d
holding that article 2 of the ucc preempts common law claims holding that the flsa preempts certain state law claims holding the ftca exemption of liability for independent contractors preempts state law where it imposes nondelegable duties holding that fifra preempts state law failure to warn claims holding that general maritime law preempts state law