application for permit” prior to receiving FERC approval. 5 .The petition for judicial review was filed in Washington County in Idaho’s Third Judicial District on April 27, 2009. On December 9, 2009, this Court entered an Administrative Order, to become effective on July 1, 2010, establishing venue for water rights disputes in the Snake River Basin Adjudication District Court of the Fifth Judicial District. Neither party thereafter sought a change of venue to that court but it should be noted that any future dispute of this nature is appropriately venued with that court. 6 . The judge also noted authority from other jurisdictions supporting the proposition that a water right does not vest until a license is issued. See, e.g., Little v. Greene & Weed Inv., 839 P.2d 791, 794 (Utah 1992) (<HOLDING>); Green v. Wheeler, 254 Or. 424, 458 P.2d 938,
holding that permits only give the applicant an inchoate or contingent right to put the water to a beneficial use recognizing the right to use water to generate power holding that the legislative assembly intended the water right certificate not the permit even when followed by a beneficial use to mark the point at which a water right becomes vested holding that article x  2 of the california constitution dictates the basic principles defining water rights that no one can have a protectible interest in the unreasonable use of water and that holders of water rights must use water reasonably and beneficially holding that until the state issues a certificate of appropriation any right to use the water remains inchoate