or other mental impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function.” Id. The ALJ found that Roth-feldt had several severe physical impairments, including probable osteoarthritis. This in and of itself is sufficient to meet the requirement that he have a physical impairment imposing an additional and significant work-related limitation of function. See Edwards v. Heckler, 755 F.2d 1513, 1515 (11th Cir. 1985) (concluding that the term “ ‘significant’ requires something less than ‘severe’” when considering whether an impairment is disabling). It is of no import whether Rothfeldt’s additional impairment is mental; an IQ score between 60 and 70 with an unrelated significant physical impairment satisfies the criteria for Listing 12.05(C). Id. at 1516 (<HOLDING>). We cannot know if Rothfeldt meets the
holding that the alj erred in rejecting the iq of a claimant whose work history was limited primarily to working for his father holding that a claimant was entitled to benefits under listing 1205c because he had an iq score of 67 in addition to asthma and lung disease holding petitioners claim was factual in nature where he alleged the bia had failed to accord sufficient weight to the seriousness of his sons asthma holding that completing sixth grade and a limited ability to read were not inconsistent with a valid iq score of 68 holding that the alj is not obliged to accept an iq if there is a substantial basis in the record for believing that the claimant was feigning the results