§ 1450 (“All injunctions, orders, and other proceedings had in such action prior to its removal shall remain in full force and effect until dissolved or modified by the district court.”); Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Teamsters, 415 U.S. 423, 435-38, 94 S.Ct. 1113, 39 L.Ed.2d 435 (1974). Several other circuits have discussed and decided that a state court’s orders prior to removal are reviewable by the federal appellate court even when the district court did not actually rule on the claim. See Maez v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph, Inc., 54 F.3d 1488, 1495 (10th Cir.1995); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Nernberg, 3 F.3d 62, 67-68 (3d Cir.1993); Reilly v. Waukesha County., 993 F.2d 1284, 1287 (7th Cir.1993); but see Jackson v. Am. Savings Mortgage Corp., 924 F.2d 195 (11th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). We apply the same rule here and review the
holding that law of the case acts as a bar only when the issue in question was actually considered and decided by the first court holding the order is only reviewable if actually considered by the district court holding that appellate court may only review issues actually presented to and considered by the trial court holding that a transfer order issued by a district court in another circuit is reviewable only in the circuit of the transferor district court holding that a district courts order is final and immediately reviewable under mitchell if the appellants properly raised a claim of qualified immunity in the district court