P.2d 250, 267 (Alaska 1971)). 10 . Marsingill v. O'Malley, 128 P.3d 151, 159 (Alaska 2006). 11 . Marron v. Stromstad, 123 P.3d 992, 1007 (Alaska 2005) (citing Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 119 S.Ct. 1167, 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999)). 12 . Id. at 1005. 13 . Id. at 1007. 14 . Alaska R. Evid. 702(a). 15 . Alaska R. Evid. 703. 16 . Alaska R. Evid. 401: "Relevant evidence means evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence." 17 . Alaska R. Evid. 402 (providing that "[elvi-dence which is not relevant is not admissible"). 18 . Alaska R. Evid. 403. 19 . See, eg., Ayuluk v. Red Oaks Assisted Living, Inc., 201 P.3d 1183, 1192-94 (Alaska 2009) (<HOLDING>); Getchell v. Lodge, 65 P.3d 50, 56 (Alaska
holding that a trial court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of an expert witness where the testimony would have been relevant to show that the defendant breached a duty of care holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding the testimony of a witness that was not highly probative holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting testimony to only one witness where additional witnesses would have provided the same testimony holding that the trial court had erred by excluding the expert testimony of a doctor holding trial court acted within its discretion in excluding expert testimony