detainee, the inquiry is whether the denial was “imposed for the purpose of punishment or whether it [was] but an incident of some other legitimate governmental purpose.” Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 538, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979). That inquiry involves an indirect application of the Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference standard: “the Supreme Court has concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment affords pretrial detainees protections ‘at least as great as the Eighth Amendment protections available to a convicted prisoner,’ without deciding whether the Fourteenth Amendment provides greater protections.” Natale, 318 F.3d at 581 (quoting City of Revere, 463 U.S. at 244, 103 S.Ct. 2979); see also Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Pierce, 612 F.2d 754, 762 (3d Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>). Appellants do not argue that the Fourteenth
holding that a difference of medical opinion was insufficient as a matter of law to establish deliberate indifference holding that a sentence of incarceration would constitute deliberate indifference to defendants medical needs holding that disagreement with a doctors judgment does not support a claim of deliberate indifference holding that deliberate indifference to a serious medical need establishes an eighth amendment violation holding that at a minimum the deliberate indifference standard of estelle v gamble must be met