that members of the Marine Corps "promise[d] that Sgt. Eugene was no longer a threat to our family ... [and] [h]e was supposed to be detained and monitored at Henderson Hall/ Fort Myers and would not be able to leave to Barracks unaccompanied.” (ECF No. 1, at 2). Pro se complaints must be construed liberally, and it is no leap of logic to conclude that such allegations support a claim for failure to protect. 11 . The Fourth Circuit has called this exception "[t]he most important” exception to the FTCA. McMellon v. United States, 387 F.3d 329, 335 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc). 12 . Courts have found other situations beyond those noted in Berkovitz wherein an agent has "no rightful option but to adhere.” See, e.g., Downs v. U.S. Army Corps of Eng’rs, 333 Fed. Appx. 403, 409 (11th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); Irving v. United States, 162 F.3d 154, 172
holding that courtapproved stipulation satisfied notice requirement for assumption of contract holding conflict of interest on the part of a government official who participated in contract negotiations in violation of federal law rendered contract unenforceable holding that arbitration award is binding on the parties holding that a contract must entitle the plaintiff to money damages in the event of the governments breach of that contract holding that governments assumption of obligations in binding contract rendered discretionary function exception inapplicable