rear tires went co saw the marked cruiser and was attempting to comply with traffic laws, I find it highly unlikely that the rear wheels went substantially onto the shoulder three times in half a mile. While Sugar did not deny the possibility that a rear tire went over the line because it was á large van, he did not notice a problem. Regardless, such one-time movement was not a violation of the Missouri statute. Accordingly, the initial stop was not reasonable or justified by probable cause under Missouri law. Because “the stop of the car is held unlawful, the drugs should be suppressed as the fruit of the poisonous tree.” United States v. Rowell, 2004 WL 555261 at *6 (D.Mass. March 18, 2004); see also Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 487-88, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963) (<HOLDING>). C. The Continued Seizure Even if the initial
holding that evidence that would not have been obtained but for an unlawful search must be excluded as fruit of the poisonous tree holding incriminating statements defendant made after a detective questioned defendant about serial numbers the detective had obtained during an unlawful search of a stolen car were fruit of the poisonous tree holding that if police conduct  unconstitutional searches that acquire information used to obtain a search warrant then evidence seized during the later search conducted pursuant to warrant would be inadmissible as fruit of the poisonous tree holding evidence found pursuant to warrant based on probable cause provided by prior illegal entry was inadmissible as fruit of the poisonous tree holding incriminating statements defendant made when police officers questioned him regarding heroin the officers found during an unlawful search of defendants house were fruit of the poisonous tree