ll-46-9(l)(a), DeSoto County enjoys immunity for the clerk’s negligence in this case. CONCLUSION ¶ 13. Because the Mississippi Tort Claims act provides’ immunity for the clerk’s failure to issue notice of the can-celled warrant, we reverse the circuit judge’s denial of DeSoto County’s motion for summary judgment and render judgment in the county’s favor. ¶ 14. REVERSED AND RENDERED. WALLER, C.J., LAMAR, PIERCE AND COLEMAN, JJ., CONCUR. CHANDLER, J., DISSENTS WITH SEPARATE WRITTEN OPINION JOINED BY RANDOLPH, P. J., KITCHENS AND KING, JJ. 1 . Black’s Law Dictionary 818 (9th ed.2009). 2 . See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 767, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 2710, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982) (citing Larson v. Domestic & Foreign Commerce Corp., 337 U.S. 682, 687, 69 S.Ct. 1457, 1460, 93 L.Ed. 1628 (1949) (<HOLDING>)). 3 .See Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1, 13, 10
recognizing that while the lack of an express statute granting sovereign immunity precludes such immunity as a matter of law the entity in question could still be determined to be acting as an agency of the state under the facts and circumstances of a particular relationship holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added recognizing that the old notion that the king can do no wrong still applies in the realm of sovereign immunity recognizing application of sovereign immunity to school districts holding that a state may waive its sovereign immunity