and tutor of a group of school children might well conduct a search of the student’s book bag to address such a substantial threat to the children assembled at school. Affirmed. SHEPHERD, C.J., concurs. 1 . See, e.g., United States v. Holloway, 290 F.3d 1331, 1339 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1161, 123 S.Ct. 966, 154 L.Ed.2d 897 (2003) (upholding the fruits of an investigative detention and search of individuals on a front porch based upon anonymous tip that shots had been fired: "when an emergency is reported by an anonymous caller, the need for immediate action may outweigh the need to verify the reliability of the caller”); People v. Wells, 38 Cal.4th 1078, 45 Cal.Rptr.3d 8, 136 P.3d 810, 815 (2006), cert. denied, 550 U.S. 937, 127 S.Ct. 2246, 167 L.Ed.2d 1096 (2007) (<HOLDING>). 2 . Under the rubric of "special needs”
holding that the uncorroborated testimony of an informant may be sufficient to sustain a conviction holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention holding that an officers diligent pursuit of an investigation during the detention is a factor in determining the reasonableness of an investigatory stop holding that an uncorroborated anonymous report of a possibly intoxicated driver weav ing all over the roadway justified an investigatory detention holding that the uncorroborated testimony of the insured can establish that he is legally entitled to recover from the driver of a phantom vehicle