of the alleged [tort].” Id. at 448-49, 550 A.2d 1155 (Citation omitted). Further, the Pennwalt Court commented, 314 Md. at 441, 550 A.2d 1155, that “an action accrues when the ‘nature and cause of the injury,’ and not merely when the nature of the injury, are known or should have been known.” (Emphasis added). The Court added that the “application of the discovery rule in a product liability action requires that the statute of limitations should not begin to run until the plaintiff knows or through the exercise of due diligence should know of injury, its probable cause, and either manufacturer wrongdoing or product defect.” Id. at 452, 550 A.2d 1155 (emphasis added); see id. at 453, 550 A.2d 1155 (“[Ljimitations do not begin until a plaintiff knows or reasonably .2d 446 (1985) (<HOLDING>) when he ascertains, or through the exercise of
recognizing cause of action recognizing in a latent disease case that an injured persons cause of action accrues either 1 holding that cause of action for asbestosis accrues upon discovery of disease not at time of exposure to asbestos recognizing the cause of action recognizing that breach of contract cause of action accrues at time of the breach