states that if a plaintiff cannot obtain the required affidavit and report because a party has failed to produce necessary records as required by statute, the plaintiff may submit with the complaint only an affidavit explaining the situation, and the required affidavit and report confirming the claim's merit may be filed within ninety days. If the legislature wanted litigants in the plaintiffs' situation to proceed without filing an amended complaint, it could have included a specific subsection authorizing such a course of action. 40 . Appellants’ Br. 27. 41 . R.165 at 39-40. The additional reasons raised to the district court by the plaintiffs are unrelated to the specific policy they allege on appeal is lacking. 42 . Cf. Egebergh v. Nicholson, 272 F.3d 925, 927-28 (7th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); Estate of Gee ex rel. Beeman v. Johnson, 365
holding that type ii non insulin dependent diabetic plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact by presenting evidence regarding how they could readily monitor their blood sugar levels and maintain them at proper levels during work so as to reduce or eliminate the risk of a hypoglycemic reaction while driving holding that an adverse party must state specific facts showing there is a genuine issue of fact for trial holding that there was a genuine issue for trial regarding whether individual officers who withheld insulin from a diabetic detainee were deliberately indifferent holding that the nonmoving party must go beyond the pleadings to show that there is a genuine issue for trial holding that there was a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment