be used verbatim as a jury instruction. This statute in its entirety reads: The operator of a vehicle shall exercise care to avoid colliding with any pedestrian and shall give an audible signal when nee-essary and exercise appropriate precaution upon observing any child or any obviously confused, incapacitated, or intoxicated person. This section supersedes any conflicting provision of this chapter or of a local ordinance. Utah Code Ann. § 41-6-80 (1998). The court delivered this statute as a jury instruction, omitting the last sentence, "This section supersedes any conflicting provision of this chapter or of a local ordinance." The Go-rostietas argue that by omitting the last sentence, the court misled the jury as to the legal duties of Parkinson and Dalinda Gorost-ieta. .App.1990) (<HOLDING>); Chamberlain v. Thames, 131 N.C.App. 705, 509
holding proper the dismissal of an action by the surviving mother for medical and funeral expenses incurred on behalf of her unemancipated minor children who died as a result of an automobile accident holding that recovery for medical expenses incurred as result of accident depends on proof of necessity and reasonableness holding that statute does not eliminate plaintiffs burden to prove reasonableness and necessity of past medical expenses holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid holding that statute allows admissibility of evidence by affidavit to prove reasonableness and necessity of medical expenses