and to protect their money and narcotics. Officer Merrill testified that assault rifles, like the AK-47, are capable of firing rounds that can pierce body armor worn by police officers. Sufficiency of the Deadly Weapon Finding In his sole issue, appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s finding that he used or exhibited a deadly weapon during the commission of the offense. When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict to determine whether any rational fact finder could have found the essential elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 2789, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); Brooks v. State, 323 S.W.3d 893, 912 (Tex.Crim.App.2010) (<HOLDING>). The jurors are the exclusive judges of the
holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability actions is the preponderance of the evidence standard holding that jackson standard is only standard to use when determining sufficiency of evidence holding that the standard of review for the sufficiency of the evidence is the same as the standard for denying a motion for a directed verdict holding the applicable standard of review in addressing the sufficiency of the evidence is manifest error holding that appellate court could not review the sufficiency of the evidence  based on a particular legal standard because that standard was not submitted to the jury and no party objected to the charge on this ground or requested that the jury be charged using this standard