because, under the circumstances discussed above, a reasonable attorney would have done more investigation at the initial stage and later on in the course of the litiga tion, there has been an insufficient showing of complete bad faith in bringing this action. CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, the court hereby concludes that a Rule 11(c)(1)(B) sanction is to be imposed on Mr. Lee Nuwestra in the amount of $25,000.00 payable to defendants in payment of their counsel fees. 1 . Plaintiff also brought a complaint under the New York State Executive law which was dismissed on the ground that a prior proceeding before the New York City Human Rights Commission collaterally estopped him from pursuing this claim. See Forbes v. Merrill Lynch et al., 957 F.Supp. 450 (S.D.N.Y.1997) (<HOLDING>). 2 . Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that
holding that probable cause determination presents a mixed question of law and fact holding that the commissions no probable cause determination was decisive holding that a probable cause determination is appropriate for summary judgment where there are no genuine issues of material fact and no credibility issues holding fabrication not protected because no probable cause holding that a determination of probable cause does not bar a state law malicious prosecution claim where the claim is based on the police officers supplying false information to establish probable cause