973 F.2d 1065, 1075 (3d Cir.1992) (citing Bildisco, 465 U.S. at 532, 104 S.Ct. 1188); accord, e.g. United States v. Dewey Freight Sys., Inc., 31 F.3d 620, 624 (8th Cir.1994); McLean Indus., Inc. v. Med. Lab. Automation, Inc., (In re McLean Indus.), 96 B.R. 440, 449 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1989). A debtor-in-possession which “elects to receive benefits from the other party to an executory contract pending a decision to reject or assume the contract” must, nevertheless, pay for the reasonable value of those services. Bildisco, 465 U.S. at 531, 104 S.Ct. 1188 (noting that those services, “depending on the circumstances of a particular contract, may be what is specified in the contract”); see also Goldin v. Putnam Lovell, Inc. (In re Monarch Capital Corp.), 163 B.R. 899, 907-910 (Bankr.D.Mass.1994) (<HOLDING>). Debtor’s resistance to the instant Motion to
holding that interest on postpetition taxes incurred by the debtor during chapter 11 reorganization is an administrative expense holding in a chapter 7 consumer debt case the nondebtor spouses income is not  rendered liable for the debts of the debtor but rather is simply  considered in determining whether the debtor himself has available discretionary income by virtue of the fact that he and the nondebtor spouse share a joint household holding that a postpetition claim under section 1305 is a liability that arises postpetition and relates only to postpetition activity holding that nondebtor party was entitled to reasonable value of services actually conferred on debtor during postpetition preassumptionrejection period holding that licensor was entitled to administrative expense priority claim where debtor remained in possession postpetition of real property under a license agreement