for a different result. Coffey, 796 F.2d at 220; Kendall U.S.A., Inc., 666 F.Supp. at 1268. Factors considered in this analysis include, the likely speed to trial in each forum; each forum’s familiarity with the relevant law; and the relationship of each forum to the controversy, particularly concerning whether jurors have a financial interest in the case, and whether jurors in one forum are better equipped to apply community standards. Coffey, 796 F.2d at 221 n. 4; RCA Trademark Mgmt. S.A.S., 2014 WL 3818289, at *5. Neither party asserts that one district would result in a faster resolution of this case. This Court also concludes that there is little meaningful difference in the adjudicatory speed betwee Co., No. 1:14-cv-00823-TWP-DML, 2015 WL 5552660, at *8 (S.D.Ind. Sept. 16, 2015) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, the Defendants do not contest
holding that three sexually suggestive comments over a three month period were not frequent enough nor severe enough to be unreasonable interference with the plaintiffs work environment holding that a one month delay is acceptable holding that a two month difference in median time to disposition was not statistically significant enough to favor one forum over another holding that an eight and onehalf month delay was enough to warrant further inquiry holding that a two month period might be enough  to prove the causation prong