section 7104(e). Fluker, 5 Vet.App. at 298. In Fluker, the envelope in which VA mailed the BVA decision was addressed to “244 Allen St., East Montevallo, AL 35115”, whereas the appellant’s correct address was “244 Island St. East, Montevallo, AL 35115.” Fluker, 5 Vet.App. at 298 (emphasis added). In the instant case, the RO’s use of an incorrect ZIP Code for the appellant rendered incorrect the address used to mail the SOC. As to the incorrect ZIP Code, the Court takes judicial notice that the ZIP Code for Tulsa, Oklahoma, is 74134, whereas the ZIP Code used by the RO, 73134, is for Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and that, according to http:// www.mapquest.com, the driving distance between these two cities is approximately 112 miles. See Smith (Brady) v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 235, 238 (1991) (<HOLDING>) (citing Fed.R.Evid. 201(b)). Moreover, the RO
holding that the appellate court may take judicial notice of its own records in related proceedings holding that cjourts may take judicial notice of facts not subject to reasonable dispute recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice recognizing that the court may take judicial notice of its own docket holding district court could not properly take judicial notice of findings of another court establishing nature of salary dispute in question