the Borough of Berwick “to impose non-monetary penalties, including the loss or suspension of a license, for the conduct of third-party tenants.” (Appellants’ Br. at 61.) First, as previously explained, the Ordinance does not provide that landlords may be disciplined for the conduct of tenants. Rather, landlords may be disciplined, with a formal warning or the suspension, non-renewal, or revocation of a license, for their own acts or failures to act. Appellants are not expected to prevent illegal tenant conduct. However, landlords are expected to participate with the Borough and take affirmative steps toward curtailing that conduct. Second, the Ordinance and its penalties are authorized under the Borough Code. Commonwealth v. Creighton, 168 Pa. Cmwlth. 68, 639 A.2d 1296, 1300 (1994) (<HOLDING>). The Code grants the specific authority to
holding that subject to its enabling legislation and pursuant to its police power a borough has the authority to enact laws that it perceives necessary to protect the public health safety and general welfare so long as the goal sought to be achieved is legitimate and the means used to achieve that goal are reasonably necessary and not unduly oppressive recognizing that an exercise of the police power necessary to safeguard the public safety and welfare can justify impairment of contractual rights and obligations holding that validity of regulations will be sustained as long as  reasonably related to the purposes of the enabling legislation  holding a circuit courts authority to grant a new trial is so necessary to the judicial process and so essential to fair trials that its existence is a necessary incident to the exercise of judicial power by the circuit court holding that congress had exceeded its authority by using its section five power under the fourteenth amendment to enact the statute