the marketplace value of the skills of a particular individual when determining his or her salary. Unequal wages that reflect market conditions of supply and demand are not prohibited by the EPA.” Stanley I, 13 F.3d at 1322 (citing Horner v. Mary Institute, 613 F.2d 706, 714, (8th Cir.1980)) (emphasis added). Similarly, in Homer, the Eighth Circuit held that “it is our view that an employer may consider the market place value of the skills of a particular individual when determining his or her salary.” Horner, 613 F.2d at 714. In other words, merely relying on the pri- or salary of an employee, without analyzing the market value of the employer’s skills, is insufficient to establish an equal pay defense. See also Glenn v. General Motors Corp., 841 F.2d 1567, 1571 (11th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); Price v. Lockheed Space Operations Co., 856
holding that parole status alone is insufficient to justify search of a parolee holding that prior salary alone without consideration of skill or experience cannot justify pay disparities holding that the facts that defendant had outofstate license plates and was traveling on a highway that was a known drug trafficking corridor alone cannot justify the stop holding that tradition cannot alone justify the infringement on individual liberties recognizing that the stated purposes of a contempt sanction alone cannot be determinative