the case may require payment of just costs and any actual expenses, including attorney fees, incurred as a result of the removal. A certified copy of the order of remand shall be mailed by the clerk to the clerk of the State court. The state court may thereupon proceed with such case. A court is “without jurisdiction to review a remand order grounded in Section 1447(c) even if based on erroneous principles or analysis.” Van Meter v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 1 F.3d 445, 448 (6th Cir.1993) (citation omitted). To determine whether a district court is precluded from reviewing a magistrate-issued remand order, we must first determine whether that order constitutes a § 1447(c) remand order. We agree with the Third Circuit’s determination that a magistrate-issued r 413, 414 (9th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). “[After certification to the state court[,] a
holding that mere entry of a remand order divests a federal court of jurisdiction even where no certified copy of the order was mailed to a state court holding that certification of a remand order divests federal court jurisdiction holding that the mailing of a certified copy of a remand order to a state court divests federal jurisdiction holding that filing of appeal to federal circuit divests this court of jurisdiction to consider motion to stay court order pending appeal holding that the fourth circuit has jurisdiction to review a district courts sua sponte remand order even when that remand order is styled as a remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction if the order was in fact based on the procedural insufficiency of the notice of removal