award of a contract or any alleged violation of statute or regulation in connection with a procurement or a proposed, procurement. ... [T]he United States Court of Federal Claims ... shall have jurisdiction to entertain such an action without regard to whether suit is instituted before or after the contract is awarded. 28 U.S.C. § 1491(b)(1) (2012) (emphasis added). The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has held that the United States Court of Federal Claims has jurisdiction to adjudicate bid protests at “all stages of the process of acquiring property or services, beginning with the process for determining a need for property or services and ending with contract completion and closeout.” Res. Conservation Grp. v. United States, 597 F.3d 1238, 1244 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (<HOLDING>). Count One of the March 3, 2017 Amended
holding that for the government to be sued on a contract pursuant to the tucker act there must be privity of contract between the plaintiff and the united states holding that the tucker act grants the united states court of federal claims jurisdiction to grant nonmonetary relief in connection with contractor claims including claims requesting an interpretation of contract terms recognizing that generally services that benefit debtor are services that facilitate completion of a case recognizing that section 1498 rather than the tucker act 28 usc  1491a grants this court jurisdiction over patent infringement claims against the united states holding that the tucker act grants the united states court of federal claims jurisdiction to adjudicate bid protests at all stages of the process of acquiring property or services beginning with the process for determining a need for property or services and ending with contract completion and closeout