that: the record of the proceedings before the Board was closed on September 30, 2003; the October 22, 2003, meeting was for the designated and limited purpose of deliberating and rendering a decision; at no time did Appellant’s counsel agree on the record to an extension of the forty-five-day period for written decision under Section 908(9); and the Board did not issue its written decision until November 28, 2003, fifty-nine days after the September 30, 2003, hearing. In these circumstances, Appellant asserted that her application for a special exception and variance were deemed approved on November 14, 2003, forty-five days after the September 30 hearing, the last date on which evidence was taken and the date on which t e, 124 Pa.Cmwlth. 595, 601, 556 A.2d 947, 949-50 (1989) (<HOLDING>). The court observed that the Hogan court
holding that the statutory right to counsel at a civil commitment hearing implicitly includes the right to the effective assistance of that counsel holding that the term hearing includes specially scheduled sessions for argument by counsel holding that probable cause hearing under wis stat  980092 was not intended to be an evidentiary hearing but rather a review of the paper record with argument allowed by counsel holding that appearance at the scheduled hearing demonstrates actual notice of the hearing holding that when defendant failed to appear at scheduled suppression hearing the court could have decided the motion in defendants absence but it did not have the authority to refuse to consider it