objected to this argument as improper and moved for a mistrial, which the court denied. On appeal, Mason contends this improper argument violated her motion in limine because it informed the jury of the effect of its answers, it added to the burden already imposed on her by the jury charge’s improper comment on the weight of the evidence, and it required counsel to spend additional time rebutting the improper argument. Therefore, she contends, the trial court erred in denying her motion for mistrial. Again, however, because we do not have a complete reporter’s record, we are unable to review the evidence to determine if the verdict was based on the evidence or on the improper argument. See Wooten v. S. Pac. Transp. Co., 928 S.W.2d 76, 80 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1995, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). And, because we must presume that the omitted
holding that appellants failure to have trial proceedings transcribed precluded appellate review of whether trial court gave jury improper instruction holding that appellate review is precluded when the error is invited holding where challenge was waived that appellate review is precluded holding that lack of complete record precluded appellate review of alleged incurable jury argument holding that lack of appellate jurisdiction is fundamental error