some media attention, see, e.g., Philip K. Ireland, VUSD board to discipline employees, North County Times, June 7,1997, at Al, Leventhal refrained from discussing it in a June 7, 1997 Board meeting lest she violate the Bylaw and risk being silenced or ejected from the meeting. (Leventhal 3 Deck, ¶ 2.) DISCUSSION I. Eleventh Amendment immunity Defendants argue that because school districts are state agencies for purposes of the Eleventh Amendment, see Belanger v. Madera Unified School Dist., 963 F.2d 248, 251 (9th Cir.1992), the District and the individual Defendants are immune from suit. As to the District itself, the Court agrees that the Eleventh Amendment bars the Plaintiffs’ claims. See, e.g., Cervato v. San Francisco Community College Dist., 26 F.3d 968, 972 (9th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). This holding has little practical effect,
holding california school district a state agency for purposes of the eleventh amendment holding that uc hastings was immune under the eleventh amendment from suit on plaintiffs  1983 claims and granting motion to dismiss holding college school district immune from suit in federal court under eleventh amendment holding state immune from suit involving a federal question holding state immune from suit brought in state court