CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)
holding that appellate courts determine the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction based on a review of all of the evidence admitted at trial holding that without transcript of trial proceedings appellate court cannot review underlying evidence so as to conclude that trial courts judgment is not supported by evidence holding that courts cannot review the sufficiency of the evidence underlying an indictment unless there is some clear statutory authority to do so holding that the appellants failure to provide a transcript of the proceedings was fatal to its claims because without a record of the trial proceedings the appellate court can not sic properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial courts judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory holding that in appellate proceedings where no transcript is provided a trial courts decision has the presumption of correctness and the burden is on the appellant to demonstrate error