Oehlmann. Currently we are holding the Total Control Account checkbooks to allow Attorney Gaughan time to review the beneficiary designation. Your patience is appreciated.” (Doc. 32-4 at 1.) 5 . Upon defense counsel's request, Plaintiff's former counsel discontinued the Pike County litigation without prejudice on August 28, 2006. 6 .According to the court’s case-action memorandum of October 12, 2006, we recommended that counsel work to dismiss third-party defendant Smirman from this action. (Doc. 9). According to Plaintiff’s counsel's letter of November 14, 2006, Plaintiff’s counsel was to file a notice dismissing Smirman from the action. (Doc. 32-19 at 1). No such notice is reflected in the docket. Accordingly, to reflect the understanding of the parties, we shall dismiss D.Pa.1991) (<HOLDING>). We note, however, that all of these cases
holding that private misuse of a state statute does not describe conduct that can be attributed to the state holding that provisions of the uipa can be utilized to describe conduct constituting bad faith holding that a bad faith claim is a tort holding that the alleged conduct constituting violations of the uipa and the regulations can be considered in determining whether the insurer acted in bad faith under section 8371 holding that the insured may make reference to a section in the uipa to illustrate its insurers bad faith behavior for refusing to pay a loss