rule, a trial court loses jurisdiction over a criminal case ten days after entry of a final judgment. CR 59.05; see Commonwealth v. Gross, 936 S.W.2d 85, 87 (Ky.1996). However, the trial court is provided an exception to that rule by KRS 439.265, jurisdiction “granted for the limited purpose of considering shock' probation.” Gross,' 936 S.W.2d at 87. ‘ Although KRS 439.265 provides the trial court with jurisdiction outside the usual ten days following entry of a final judgment, “the authority granted.by the shock probation, statute is limited by the time constraints outlined in the statute[.]” Prater v. Commonwealth, 82 S.W.3d 898, 906 (Ky.2002). Strict compliance with the time limits established in KRS 439.265 is required. See Terhune v. Commonwealth, 907 S.W.2d 779, 782 (Ky.App.l995) (<HOLDING>). Since this court has required strict
holding that notice not required because cercla is a strict liability statute recognizing that strict compliance with  1557 is required holding that strict compliance with the 30180day time limit set forth in krs 4392651 is required recognizing that the government generally has the right to insist on performance in strict compliance with the contract specifications holding that strict compliance is not required