all of Ram’s claims except its breach of contract claim per Rule 12(b)(6). However, the court held that the Agreement’s liquidated damages clause would limit Ram’s damages to $1,000. Additionally, although Ram brought claims for the breach of two distinct contracts — first, the sales agreement between Ram and ADT, and second, the UL Certificate certifying that Ram’s security system complied with UL standards— the district court held that the parties had entered into only one contract, as the subsequent document did not impose any new obligations on the parties. Ram did not appeal this particular finding. The parties entered into a final stipulation to dismiss on July 12, 2012, pursuant to Raceway Properties, Inc. v. Emprise Corp., 613 F.2d 656, 657 (6th Cir.1980) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal on
holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment holding that a disqualification order in a criminal case is not appealable holding sanctions order pursuant to district courts inherent powers not immediately appealable holding appealable a case dismissed in effect by the district courts order holding that trial court did not have jurisdiction to order reinstatement of previously dismissed action and thus reinstatement order was void and of no effect and previous order of dismissal was still in effect