product rules that would not so dilute the power of the population statistics. By last year, the NRC had abandoned advocating for the ceiling principles. Id. at 35. The NRC, however, has continued to reject an unmodified product rule and has instead provided several alternative formulas all of which provide conservative estimates of profile frequencies. The recommended adjustment to the product rule that is relevant to the DNA analysis conducted here is the faetor-of-ten adjustment. Id. at 34 (‘We conclude that, when several loci are used, the pr ified product rule, using the factor of ten calculations, to be admissible); State v. Johnson, 186 Ariz. 329, 922 P.2d 294 (1996) (finding modified ceiling principle to be admissible); State v. Bible, 175 Ariz. 549, 858 P.2d 1152, 1181 (1993) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1046, 114 S.Ct. 1578,
holding product rule in admissible because prosecution failed to establish independence of alleles holding that in a prosecution for lurking evidence of a prior act of lewdness by defendant was admissible to establish motive holding alford plea admissible in prosecution for felon in possession of firearm holding alford plea admissible in burglary prosecution holding inconsistent out of court statements otherwise admissible not admissible against government in criminal prosecution