suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop here. We disagree. We first note that the lower standard of reasonable suspicion, as opposed to probable cause, only applies to cases involving a brief encounter between a citizen and a law enforcement officer on a public street. State v. Atkins, 834 N.E.2d 1028, 1033 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied. Here, Gaddie was at his own residence and not on a public street. However, we will address the parties’ arguments regarding whether this was an, investigatory stop. The State contends that .the encounter, was an investigatory stop, because Officer Newlin was responding, to a report of a disturbance. However, a report of a disturbance without more is not a sufficient, basis upon which to conduct an investigatory stop. See, e.g., id. at 1034 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, Gaddie was not standing with the
holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop holding that reasonable suspicion is required to prolong a traffic stop after the purpose for which the investigatory stop was instituted has been accomplished holding there was no reasonable suspicion which would justify an investigatory stop despite report of a domestic disturbance holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop holding that flight from police can help establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop