2003. According to the Board’s executive secretary, he advised Dr. Hsu the Board would consider that recommended decision during a teleconference on December 29, 2003, and Dr. Hsu instead asked to personally appear before the Board at its scheduled March 19, 2004, meeting. Meanwhile, Investigative Panel B of the Board thereafter issued a March 19, 2004, complaint against Dr. Hsu, real-leging the claims in the 2003 complaint and three additional claims of inappropriate care. At the Board’s March 19, 2004, meeting and before considering the ALJ’s recommendation on the allegations in the 2003 complaint, the Board summarily suspended Dr. Hsu’s license. See N.D.C.C. § 43-17-32.1. Dr. Hsu did not appeal that decision. See Bland v. Commission on Med. Competency, 557 N.W.2d 379, 383 (N.D.1996) (<HOLDING>).- The Board then considered the ALJ’s
holding that a temporary order granting emergency relief and temporary child custody under the domestic violence act is not immediately appealable holding that orders that deny some rule 3850 claims but dismiss others with leave to amend under spera are not final appealable orders holding that remand orders are also appealable orders under 28 usc  1291 holding temporary suspensions were not final orders under ndcc ch 2832 but were appealable under ndcc  4317321 holding that orders remanding an action to a federal agency are generally not considered final appealable orders