to confirm his seed purchase from Palen was printed with the name “Tri State Seed Grain, Inc.” When Palen breached that contract, Olson notified Seed-link that he would not be able to perform under the Toulousaine contract. Olson has been clearly identified as the “ ‘one against whom the judgment was rendered.’ ” Aman Collection Service, Inc. v. Burgess, 612 S.W.2d at 408. The law from other jurisdictions also indicates that doing business under another name or several names does not create an entity separate and distinct from the person operating the business, and the person remains personally liable for all his or her obligations. Duval v. Midwest Auto City, Inc., 425 F. Supp. 1381 (D. Neb. 1977). See, also, Patterson v. V & M Auto Body, 63 Ohio St. 3d 573, 589 N.E.2d 1306 (1992) (<HOLDING>); Victor Auto Parts, Inc. v. Cuva, 148 Misc. 2d
holding that an action naming a state entity as a defendant did not constitute an action against the state because the state entity was sued in its capacity as receiver holding that a sole proprietorship was not a separate legal entity capable of being sued under ohio law holding sba is an integral part of federal government and is not a separate legal entity holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver recognizing that the montgomery county department of correction and rehabilitation is not a legal entity capable of being sued