v. Ford, 56 F.3d 265, 269 n. 10 (D.C.Cir.1995) (stating that a “visibly upset mother” had nothing to do with determining whether some other individual posed a threat from inside the house). If the police officers believed that Ms. Lewis posed a threat, it appears to us that, at the very least, they would have conducted a pat down search of Ms. Lewis to ensure that she had no weapons on her person. Finally, Officer Hawes testified that he “didn’t have any information at all” when asked whether he had information that any one was inside the Lewis apartment prior to his decision to conduct the protective sweep. Lack of information cannot provide an articu-lable basis upon which to justify a protective sweep. See United States v. Delgadillo-Velasquez, 856 F.2d 1292, 1298 (9th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Akrawi, 920 F.2d 418, 420-21
holding a protective sweep unconstitutional where officers had no information that any other persons were in the apartment holding that protective sweep was permitted of adjacent room of apartment where apartment consisted of two small rooms holding that protective sweep was justified incident to arrest outside residence where officers had reasonable suspicion that dangerous individuals were in apartment holding that the officers were entitled to conduct a protective sweep because they located the defendant in the house there were other people present and the defendant was actively trying to conceal drags holding that the officers were justified in conducting a protective sweep incident to the defendants arrest on outstanding warrants because the officers had information that the defendant was suspected of running a methamphetamine operation on the premises other people were living there and assisting the defendant and at the time the sweep began the defendant had not yet been located