(11th Cir. 2012). In reviewing for substantive reasonableness, we examine the totality of the circumstances and ask whether the statutory factors set forth in § 3553(a) support the sentence in question. United States v. Gonzalez, 550 F.3d 1319, 1324 (11th Cir. 2008). The weight accorded any particular § 3553(a) factor is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the district court. United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007). Although we do not presume that a sentence falling within the guideline range is reasonable, we ordinarily expect such a sentence to be reasonable. United States v. Hunt, 526 F.3d 739, 746 (11th Cir. 2008). A sentence imposed well below the statutory maximum penalty also indicates that the sentence is reasonable. See Gonzales, 550 F.3d at 1324 (<HOLDING>). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e), a court may revoke
recognizing a claim that the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum holding that a withinguideline sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the allowable statutory maximum holding sentences need only be below the statutory maximum holding that a defendants sentence was reasonable in part because it was well below the statutory maximum holding a sentence 110 the length of the 20year statutory maximum sentence was reasonable