Allstate and the Trustee have adequately pled their state-law claims, except as otherwise noted below. A. The Trustee Has Authority to Bring Tort-Based Claims on Behalf of Bondholders. The Court rejects Defendants’ contention that the Trustee has standing to bring only contract claims, as opposed to tort-based claims, on behalf of Bondholders. Generally, an indenture trustee, such as Wells Fargo, has standing to bring claims on behalf of bondholders only if the agreement creating the indenture trust grants the trustee the power to do so. Accordingly, the issue of an indenture trustee’s standing to bring claims on behalf of bond or debenture holders turns on the specific indenture language of each case. See, e.g., Class Plaintiffs v. City of Seattle, 955 F.2d 1268, 1280 (9th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); In re Was. Pub. Power Supply Sys. Sec.
holding that a trustee in a proceeding under chapter x of the bankruptcy act did not have standing to assert on behalf of the holders of debentures issued by the bankrupt in reorganization various negligence claims against an indenture trustee holding that the indenture trustee has a separate contractual claim for its fees and expenses holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee holding that a fiduciary corporation was a purchaser within the meaning of  12a2 and was entitled to bring suit on its own behalf or on behalf of its clients holding that the relevant indenture agreement allowed the trustee to bring tort and fraud claims on behalf of the bondholders