contains only a brief general description of the property upon which taxes are due. Appellant presented no evidence that it was misled or placed at a disadvantage by the citation and pleadings. In fact, appellant concedes it properly received service. Although the description of the property did not explicitly state what specific items of personal property were at issue, such a description is unnecessary under rule 117a. The citation gave appellant sufficient notice that it was being sued by the Irving ISD for delinquent ad valo-rem taxes on personal property located at a specific address. The citation also informed appellant that failing to answer could result in a default judgment. Instead of appearing and contesting either the ownership of the persona t Worth 1999, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Sheshunoff & Co. v. Scholl, 560 S.W.2d 113,
holding that language in a merrill lynch customer account agreement that the plaintiff signed upon opening the first account  providing for arbitration of any controversy  arising out of its business  applied to the disputed second account even though the plaintiff did not sign a separate customer account agreement for the second account holding that in a suit on a sworn account the petition with an attached sworn account and verified affidavit of the sworn account was a liquidated claim proved by written instruments holding that a written statement could not be regarded as an affidavit sufficient in law for any purpose because it was not sworn to by any one or before any officer holding that subsequent affidavit contradicting prior sworn testimony does not create genuine issue of fact holding that in the absence of a prior indictment probable cause for arrest is determined by the facts in the sworn complaint