supervisors frequently made sexually inappropriate remarks, commented about her breasts, referred to male employees as plaintiffs lovers, stood over her and peered down her shirt, forbade her from dating other employees, repeatedly indicated desire to date her, and once came toward her in menacing fashion as if to touch her sexually), Garcia v. Schwab, 967 S.W.2d 883, 885, 887 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.) (affirming summary judgment for employer despite evidence that supervisor stared and commented on plaintiffs breasts, touched his genitals in her presence, discussed sexual matters with her, remarked on her and other women’s appearances, insulted and yelled at her, and made repeated sexual references with alleged intent to arouse her), with Gonzales, 72 S.W.3d at 407-08 (<HOLDING>). We overrule Gardner’s fourth appellate issue.
recognizing that a constructive discharge claim and a hostile work environment claim are not equivalent because a constructive discharge claim imposes a higher standard holding that allegations that plaintiffs supervisor brushed up against her on some occasions  were not actionable holding insufficient to sustain hostile work environment claim the fact that plaintiff was called black boy on a few occasions by coworker and that a coworker made the comment that africans had big penises holding evidence sufficient to sustain jurys verdict of hostile work environment and constructive discharge where supervisor hugged plaintiff in a manner that pressed supervisors penis against him on several occasions poked employee in buttocks with shoe box and stroked rubbed and patted employee in sensual way on several occasions holding that a hostile work environment was sufficient to constitute constructive discharge because the harassment was expressed by the plaintiffs supervisor and the offending language was not only used in the plaintiffs presence but was directed at him