finding of contempt when a father pleaded with the mother "to assist him by talking to the child or helping him get her to the car [for visitation], but [the mother] said nothing and looked at the ceiling”); Rideout v. Rideout, 110 Wash.App. 370, 40 P.3d 1192, 1197 (2002) (noting "[m]ost importantly” in its finding of contempt against a mother that the mother improperly maintained any dispute about the child’s visitation with the father was between the child and the father), aff'd, In re Marriage of Rideout, 150 Wash.2d 337, 77 P.3d 1174 (2003); id. ("[The mother] wants to cast herself in the role of a bystander without the power or right to require that [the child] follow the parenting plan. But the law imposes a greater responsibility on [the mot 214, 216, 439 S.E.2d 838, 840 (1994) (<HOLDING>), 11 . See Miller v. Miller, 375 S.C, 443, 463,
holding to warrant reversal the appellant must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice holding that prosecutorial error does not warrant reversal unless substantial prejudice results holding that a plain error that is fatal to a conviction is sufficient to warrant reversal holding that even if evidence admitted in error admission must result in material prejudice to warrant reversal holding that even when the trial court commits error in allowing the admission of hearsay statements one must show that such error was prejudicial in order to warrant reversal