real conflict, it must be disclosed. See McVoy v. Bd. of Adj. of Twp. of Montclair, 213 N.J.Super. 109, 113, 516 A.2d 634 (App.Div.1986) (stating that, “disclosure is necessary to be able to judge “whether a particular interest is sufficient to disqualify' or is too ‘remote and speculative’ ”); Marlboro Manor, Inc. v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Twp. of Montclair, 187 N.J.Super. 359, 362-63, 454 A.2d 905 (App.Div. 1982) (nullifying proceedings where two council members failed to disclose that they belonged to the church whose pastor appeared at a hearing to speak against the application for a liquor license). Thus, conflicts-of-interest issues are fact sensitive and depend upon the circumstances of the particular case. See Paruszewski v. Twp. of Elsinboro, 154 N.J. 45, 58-60, 711 A.2d 273 (1998) (<HOLDING>); Wyzykowski, supra, 132 N.J. at 526, 626 A.2d
holding that if an attorney is discharged without cause he is entitled to a charging lien for the reasonable value of his services rendered prior to the date of the substitution of counsel where 1 his representation was entirely competent and successful up until his discharge 2 any potential conflict of interest was disclosed and the plaintiff chose to continue to be represented by the attorney and 3 the discharge of the attorney occurred solely because of a fee dispute holding that to demonstrate that a conflict of interest violated his sixth amendment rights a defendant must establish that an actual conflict of interest adversely affected his lawyers performance holding that a conflict of interest independent of a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel  constitute cause where the conflict caused the attorney to interfere with the petitioners right to pursue his  1 claim holding appearance of township attorney before zoning board did not create potential conflict where he advocated position not for his own private interest but for the publics interest holding that right to appeal claim of inef fective assistance of counsel alleging that counsel had disqualifying conflict of interest waived because record did not show that jordan would have pleaded not guilty but for alleged conflict of interest