destroy the anti-modification provision of section 1322(b)(2). Thus, the Debtor may not modify the rights of Byline. The Debtor’s proposed plan is not confirmable. 2. Modification of the Stay Section 362 states that the automatic stay may be modified for property when the debtor does not have any equity in the property and the property is not necessary for reorganization. 11 U.S.C. Section 362(d). Both parties acknowledge that Debtor holds no equity in the property. The only question remains is whether the property is necessary for reorganization. In order to successfully demonstrate that a successful reorganization is possible, the Debtor must cure the arrearage owed to Byline and the Debtor has not done so in his proposed plan. See In re Stincic, 559 B.R. 890 (Bankr. W.D. Wis. 2016)(<HOLDING>) In this case, Debtor has not satisfied his
holding that the debtor has the burden of showing that collateral estoppel applies holding debtor could include property because the bank accepted payments directly from the debtor and had previously allowed the debtor to cure default holding that debtor failed to satisfy burden of showing that property was necessary to any reorganization reasonably in prospect where debtor did not have the ability based on his earnings to cure his more than 56000 arrearage on mortgage debt even over the full term of 60month plan holding that for purpose of the means test debtor can deduct mortgage payment even though debtor will abandon property holding debtor could cure after the debtor had previously made payments to the bank