Award No. 24869 (NRAB 3rd Div.1984) (upholding separation and release of claims against challenge that union had not been consulted); Award No. 1 (Sec. 11 Arb.Comm.1983) (individual release upheld); Award No. 6 (Pub.L.Bd. No. 2603 1980) (individual severance agreement upheld over later claim for reinstatement and back pay); Award No. 1881 (Spec.Bd. of Adj. No. 235 1974) (individual resignation upheld over claim of coercion); Award No. 5162 (NRAB 2d Div.1967) (individual release upheld against claim for reinstatement and back pay). 9 . TCU argues that the unilateral lump-sum separation offers will diminish RF & P's obligations under the collective bargaining agreement. These effects, TCU contends, are sufficient to invalidate the offers. J.I. Case, 321 U.S. at 339, 64 S.Ct. at 581 (<HOLDING>). This is unpersuasive. Unilateral lump-sum
holding that the disappearance by merger of a corporate employer which has entered into a collective bargaining agreement with a union does not automatically terminate all rights of the employees covered by the agreement and that in appropriate circumstances present here the successor employer may be required to arbitrate with the union under the agreement holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union holding that a city cannot be required to enter into collective bargaining sessions with an association of its employees holding that an employer cannot enter into an individual contract if it would result in a diminution of the employers obligations in matters covered by the collective bargaining agreement holding that employer overstepped its role when it refused to enter into written collective bargaining agreement because it believed unions entering the deal would violate union constitution