2003) (same quoting Mimms); Mendez v. State, 678 So.2d 388, 390 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (<HOLDING>); State v. Bernard, 650 So.2d 100, 102 (Fla. 2d
holding that a police officer may as a matter of course order the driver of a lawfully stopped car to exit his vehicle holding that once the officer asked the defendant to exit his vehicle the encounter became a stop because the defendant was no longer free to leave holding that an officer stopped the defendant when he ordered the defendant to take his hand out of his pocket holding that for general safety purposes an officer may routinely order the driver of a lawfully stopped vehicle to exit the vehicle because when the vehicle is already stopped the slight additional intrusion associated with being directed to exit the car can only be described as de minimis holding that the officer acted within the scope of his authority in requiring the defendant stopped in middle lane of traffic to exit his vehicle