years. Labrum’s maximum term is accordingly 20 years, rather than 26 years as stated by the Board of Pardons. 5 . The record indicates that the court reporter did record objections interposed during the course of the trial court’s instructions to the jury. Specifically, counsel objected to one of the jury instructions because the trial judge apparently failed to instruct the jury on one of the factors the jury should consider in weighing the credibility of eye-witness identification. The judge corrected the error. 6 . Rule 11(g) of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure provides a means to include the substance of the missing comments in the record. The procedure has not been employed in this case. See also Mark Vil Fin. Consultants Corp. v. Smedley, 792 P.2d 130, 134 (Utah App.1990) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Franklin Fin. v. New Empire Dew. Co.,
holding that parties have burden of compiling record  that will adequately preserve their arguments for review in the event of an appeal  holding parties are to confine their arguments and factual recitations to matters contained in the record holding defendant failed to preserve burden of proof issue for appeal holding arguments not raised on appeal waived holding court will generally not consider arguments presented for the first time on appeal