secular” for a reasonable observer. McCreary County, 354 F.3d at 460. The Bill of Rights is not only a cherished secular document — it is a legal document securing the rights of parties appearing in DeWeese’s courtroom and binding DeW-eese as a jurist. “The Ten Commandments are several thousands of years old, [are] not a product of ... American culture and, many believe, are the word of God.” Id. They bind no jurist and are not “law” in any courtroom, notwithstanding any similarities or historical associations between the Decalogue and our Constitution, the Bill of Rights, statutes, and common law. Thus, even though the Ten'Commandments poster is posted opposite the Bill of Rights, a “reasonable person will think religion, not history.” Indiana Civil Liberties Union, 259 F.3d at 773 (<HOLDING>), cited in McCreary County, 354 F.3d at 460. By
holding that expert testimony usually is necessary to establish a causal connection between an injury and its source unless the connection is a kind that would be obvious to laymen such as a broken leg from being struck by an automobile  holding the connection is an element holding that defending party may establish a right to summary judgment by showing that the plaintiff after an adequate period of discovery has not been able to produce and will not be able to produce evidence sufficient to allow the trier of fact to find the existence of any one of the claimants elements holding discharge less than two months after plaintiff filed a sexual harassment complaint with management and ten days after filing a complaint with state human rights office provided prima facie evidence of a causal connection between protected activity and retaliation holding that reasonable observer would not be able to make an analytical connection between ten commandments bill of rights and preamble to indiana constitution