306 n.2, 313 (applying Delaware law to a fraudulent inducement claim where the contract stated that the contract “shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware”). Under the Restatement and Mazzioni Farms, Delaware law would apply to Textile Biocides’ and Saniclean’s fraud claims. 9 . In an apparent attempt to hedge their bets in case they do not like the outcome of this motion under Delaware law, the plaintiffs agreed that Delaware law applies “[f]or purposes of this response to Avecia’s motion” only. But the plaintiffs cited no Pennsylvania cases on any issue of substantive law case in their responses to Avecia’s motion, and they did not show how the outcome of any issue would differ under Pennsylvania law. 10 . There s 1001, 1005 (3d Cir. 1980) (<HOLDING>); Uniroyal Inc. v. Home Ins. Co., 707 F. Supp.
holding that speculation objection as to expert testimony was waived where a different ground for objection was offered below holding that under texas choice of law principles contractual choice of law provisions are generally upheld holding that party waived an objection to choice of law holding that parties waived any choice of law objection by not raising an objection holding that party waived complaint regarding instruction where it did not raise specific objection