testimony even if the testimony is not controverted. Id. at 855; Castro v. State, 914 S.W.2d 159, 162 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1995, pet. ref d). B. The Right Against Compelled Self-Incrimination To protect against compelled self-incrimination, the Fifth Amendment entitles a defendant to the assistance of counsel if invoked. Holloway v. State, 780 S.W.2d 787, 792 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). Once an accused asserts the Fifth Amendment right to counsel, all interrogation must cease and may begin again only if counsel has been made available or if the accused initiates further communication. Id. at 789; Meeks v. State, 897 S.W.2d 950, 953 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1995, no pet.) (citing Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 484-85, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981)); see Castro, 914 S.W.2d at 162 (<HOLDING>). The trial court found Flores had initiated
holding that the trial court did not err in admitting the suspects statements to police where the suspect himself initiated his statement after previously expressing a different desire thereby clearly evincing his intent not to remain silent  holding that trial court did not err holding trial court did not err in admitting victims statement that she was afraid of man with same first name as defendant because statement admissible under rule 8033 holding district court did not violate sixth amendment by admitting defendants outofcourt statement holding that because defendant initiated conversation leading to statement trial court did not err in admitting statement