of a fact in issue.” Ark. R. Evid. 701 (2002). The n the facts underlying her observation, forcing Dr. Doland to concede the possibility that, under certain circumstances, the burns could have been localized. As for Dr. Doland’s conclusion that the red marks were “friction burns,” we note that appellant asked Dr. Doland if she had any specialized training in treatment or diagnosis of burns, and Dr. Doland replied that this was part of her medical training in medical school and part of her residency and that at the time of the hearing she was on rotation in the burn unit. The Arkansas Supreme Court has held that persons with particularized knowledge may give opinions without requiring that the persons be qualified as expert witnesses. See Moore, 323 Ark. at 548-50, 915 S.W.2d at 295 (<HOLDING>); Russell v. State, 306 Ark. 436, 440-41, 815
holding limited investigative detention of defendant was justified where officer investigated a report that a panhandler at a drugstore had been creating a disturbance potentially implicating a violation of the disorderly conduct statute and defendant matched the description of the suspect holding that a police investigators lay opinion that the sole of the defendants athletic shoe matched a shoe print found on the center of the victims bedroom floor was permissible where the investigator had some experience in that area and was clearly testifying that the patterns matched which was not inconsistent with a crime lab report holding that the fact the defendant matched an anonymous tips description was seen in a high crime area and walked away when police approached was insufficient to provide reasonable suspicion holding defendants confession was voluntary and admissible when police misrepresented to defendant that he had been seen with the victim the night she was murdered that his tires and shoe matched impressions found at the murder scene and that the police had dna evidence establishing defendants guilt holding that police had probable cause to arrest defendant before defendant was identified by victims where victims informed police that two cars had been taken at gunpoint and one of perpetrators was heavyset and wearing striped shirt officers located defendant in vicinity of cars defendant matched description and was disheveled and sweaty and gun was found nearby