Chief Judge. The plaintiff, a former state prisoner, seeks damages from the state prison administration under the part of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., that governs the provision of public services. Title II, Subtitle A, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131-12134. He also seeks damages under section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, but this claim need not be discussed separately. The Rehabilitation Act is materially identical to and the model for the ADA, Bryant v. Madigan, 84 F.3d 246, 248 4th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>), with Duffy v. Riveland, supra, 98 F.3d at
holding that it is not holding that retaliatory discharge is a clearly established first amendment violation holding that the adas applicability to prisons is not clearly established but strongly hinting that it is inapplicable holding coleman injunction is not clearly established law holding that clearly established law is construed as supreme court or tenth circuit decisions on point or the clearly established weight of authority from other courts