Defs.' Mot. Dismiss 7-8. This is a correct proposition of law, see supra Part IV.A.l -(discussing CSRA preclusion of APA claims), but it has no bearing on this case. Dr. Coulibaly need not invoke the APA’s sovereign immunity waiver-and indeed does not do so-because he relies on Title I of the FMLA, which, as explained above, already contains an express waiver of sovereign immunity. And to the extent that Dr. Coulibaly seeks reinstatement or any relief other than money damages, see Compl, ¶¶ 77, 79; he would still not need the APA’s sovereign Immunity waiver for actions for "relief other than money damages," 5 U.S.C. § 702, because Title I of the FMLA authorizes plaintiffs to seek from the federal government "su 1999) (same), -with Modica v. Taylor, 465 F.3d 174, 187 (5th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); Darby v. Bratch, 287 F.3d 673, 681 (8th Cir.
holding that a civil rights plaintiff failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under fmla against individual individual is not employer subject to liability under the act holding that fmla permits individual liability for public officials holding that alleged misconduct by public officials particularly by law enforcement officials is matter of public concern holding no individual liability under the adea holding that fmla does not impose individual liability