defendants could have called her at the listed telephone numbers and the call would have either forwarded to her cell phone or reached her at her residence. In her most recent motion for summary judgment, Ms. Plemons disputes the Fourth Circuit's determination that calling these numbers would have been an "exercise in futility.” Id. at 577. In fact, in her reply brief, Ms. Plemons specifically argues that the "Fourth Circuit's opinion incorrectly recited that the published phone numbers were not valid.” 2 . In fact, other courts have held that reasonable diligence requires the tax lien purchaser to contact the mortgagee bank, tenants of the subject property, or telephone numbers listed in local directories. See Scott v. Seek Lane Venture, Inc., 91 Md.App. 668, 605 A.2d 942, 951 (1992) (<HOLDING>); Nichol v. Howard, 112 Md.App. 163, 684 A.2d
holding that there is a duty to check articles of incorporation of defunct corporation for identity and address of directors holding that courts should not substitute their judgment for that of the directors of a corporation  holding that legality of employers withdrawal does not turn on provision of association bylaws or articles of incorporation holding that directors of an insolvent corporation are trustees for the creditors holding that independent directors can be entrusted with the decision to sue other directors on behalf of the corporation