of Dan’s obligation to provide medical support for his adult child, and the assessment of attorney’s fees. Teresa concedes error for each of these points, and we agree. “In a suit for divorce, the petition may not be taken as confessed if the respondent does not file an answer.” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 6.701 (Vernon 1998). Teresa was obligated to present evidence at trial of the material allegations in her petition. Agraz v. Carnley, 143 S.W.3d 547, 552 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2004, no pet.). As to the division of property, the testimony at trial only showed that she requested the division of property as it was given, without testifying as to how this was a just and right division. This was insufficient. Wilson v. Wilson, 132 S.W.3d 533, 538 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist] 2004, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). The same is true for the establishment of
holding that although there was evidence of discrimination by the employer based on race there was insufficient evidence to support a finding that the employer had constructively discharged the plaintiff holding that although there was evidence of discrimination based on race there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of constructive discharge holding that on a motion for summary judgment the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the plaintiffs position will be insufficient and there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff holding evidence insufficient to support finding of implied contract holding that given the dearth of evidence identifying describing and valuing the community estate  there is insufficient evidence to support the division of assets