CURIAM: Death row inmate, Manuel Valle, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He complains that he was denied clemency proceedings or alternatively was denied clemency itself without the benefit of a clemency investigation and clemency counsel. Petitions under § 2254 cannot be brought to challenge the process by which clemency decisions are made when issuance of a writ would not actually or impliedly invalidate a sentence. See Wilkinson v. Dotson, 544 U.S. 74, 81, 125 S.Ct. 1242, 1247-48, 161 L.Ed.2d 253 (2005) (“§ 1983 remains available for procedural challenges where success in the action would not necessarily spell immediate or speedier release for the prisoner”); Hutcherson v. Riley, 468 F.3d 750, 754 (11th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Federal habeas corpus law exists to provide a
holding claims not raised in  2254 application are forfeited holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal recognizing that  1983 and  2254 proceedings are mutually exclusive so that if a claim can be properly raised in one of those proceedings it cannot be raised in the other type of proceeding holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal