— I would follow the approach cogently described by Judge Conford in his separate opinion in that case, id. at 457-58, 390 A.2d 1177. In examining the Aviation Act, N.J.S.A. 6:1-20 to -44, Judge Conford found no evidence the Commissioner was given the authority to permit a helistop in a place lawfully rejected by a municipality. Garden State, supra, 77 N.J. at 457, 390 A.2d 1177. The majority, however, determined the Act provides the Commissioner with superseding authority over the municipality, although the Commissioner may not completely disregard local concerns, 77 N.J. at 451, 390 A.2d 1177, and must “pay due attention,” id. at 455, 390 A.2d 1177, to the lawful zoning expressions of local governments. See also Rutgers, State Univ. v. Piluso, 60 N.J. 142, 154, 286 A.2d 697 (1972) (<HOLDING>). Here, the Commissioner asserts the
holding the commissioner must sympathetically listen to local concerns holding inter alia that appellant must use local cpiu where available holding local commissioner not liable to licensee for official act in revoking license holding various actions of state insurance commissioner insufficient evidence of agreement to bribe a public official holding a local government sued under  1983 has no immunity even if its employee is entitled to qualified immunity and the court of appeals does not have jurisdiction over the local governments interlocutory appeal