potential surrogates were too minor to reasonably support a conclusion that data superiority outweighed any potential benefits from using data from a surrogate with a GNI that was closer to that of the NME in question. See China Shrimp AR5, — CIT -, 882 F.Supp.2d at 1375-76. 22 . Zhejiang DunAn Hetian Metal Co. v. United States, - CIT -, 707 F.Supp.2d 1355, 1366 (2010) (footnote omitted), vacated, on other grounds, 652 F.3d 1333 (Fed.Cir.2011); see also Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363, 1371 (Fed.Cir.2010) (“Commerce determines a linear trend that best fits the data, providing a way to predict the labor rate for a country with any given gross national income.”); Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, 61 Fed.Reg. 7308, 7345 (D es, - CIT -, 774 F.Supp.2d 1307, 1316 (2011) (<HOLDING>). 25 . Antidumping Methodologies in Proceedings
holding that letters from insureds attorney to accounting firm not privileged under the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the communication and compelling production holding that  21919 unambiguously requires collection of population data holding that constitution requires  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and a meaningful manner  for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case holding that because the statute requires commerce to use to the extent possible data from countries that are significant producers of comparable merchandise commerce may not employ a methodology that requires using data from countries which almost certainly have no domestic production  at least not any meaningful production capable of having influence or effect holding that due process requires at a minimum an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner