review of death sentences in a manner that anticipates the likely effect of Ring and its progeny. First, the special verdict would serve to facilitate our determination of harmless error during appellate review. Second, the additional procedure would assist in the jury override situation because this Court would know whether the jury’s life recommendation was based on a finding of no aggravators or on a determination that the mitigators outweighed the aggravators. Finally, a special verdict form would help to ensure that this Court does not run afoul of the Eighth Amendment by affirming a death sentence based on an invalid aggravator- — i.e. in this context, an aggravator not properly found by the jury. See Sochor v. Florida, 504 U.S. 527, 112 S.Ct. 2114, 119 L.Ed.2d 326 (1992) (<HOLDING>). By acting prospectively, we can act to ensure
holding that the death of a victim may not be considered an aggravating factor in a homicide sentencing holding evidence sufficient to support aggravating factor of old age holding that under monge double jeopardy does not prevent retrial of an aggravating factor for sentencing purposes recognizing attorneys substantial experience in the practice of law as an aggravating factor holding that an eighth amendment violation occurred when under floridas sentencing scheme a trial judge weighed an invalid aggravating factor