(stating that “[i]f the defendant used or transferred one of such firearms in connection with another felony offense (i.e., an offense other than a firearms possession or trafficking offense) an enhancement under subsection (b)(6) also would apply” in addition to the enhancement under subsection (b)(1) based on the number of firearms involved and the enhancement under subsection (b)(5) for trafficking). Moreover, assuming that § 2K2.1(b)(6) could apply to Freeman’s planned robbery of the undercover agent, the four-level enhancement that § 2K2.1(b)(6) would add to Freeman’s Guidelines offense level would bring the lower end of Freeman’s adjusted Guidelines range above the total of 43 months’ imprisonment that the court imposed pursuant to § 5K2.0(a)(2)(B). See Jeross, 521 F.3d at 573-76 (<HOLDING>). We are thus confident that if §
holding that sentencing error is harmless if the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed holding that the district courts error in calculating the amount of drugs at issue was harmless because the error had no impact on the defendants sentence holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error holding that the district courts error was however harmless in light of other considerations holding exclusion was harmless error