definition of incarceration but explaining that residence in non-secure community treatment center or- halfway house is not imprisonment for guideline purposes); United States v. Phipps, 68 F.3d 159, 162 (7th Cir. 1995) (home detention not imprisonment for guideline purposes); United States v. Gordon, 346 F.3d 135, 138-39 (5th Cir. 2003) (same); United States v. Pielago, 135 F.3d 703, 711-14 (11th Cir. 1998) (community treatment center not imprisonment for guideline purposes); United States v. Jones, 107 F.3d 1147, 1161-65 (6th Cir. 1997) (home detention not imprisonment for guideline purposes); United States v. Latimer, 991 F.2d 1509, 1514 (9th Cir. 1993) (community treatment center not imprisonment for guideline purposes); but see United States v. Rasco, 963 F.2d 132 (6th Cir. 1992) (<HOLDING>). .The IDOC record for the 1996 conviction also
holding that confinement in community treatment center after parole revocation was part of original term of imprisonment holding that a right to confrontation exists in parole revocation proceedings holding that an important part of due process in the context of parole revocation is a written statement by the factfinders as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking parole holding that a defendant at federal sentencing who is on state parole where no parole revocation has occurred is not subject to an undischarged term of imprisonment thus ussg  5g13 is inapplicable holding that prison term following revocation of probation is a modification and part of the actual sentence imposed for the original offense