eross-appeals, arguing that it is entitled to attorney fees under the statute for its successful defense against All Clean's mechanics lien claim. We do not address this issue, however, because it was not raised in the trial court and, therefore, is not preserved for appeal. See generally 488 Main St. v. Easy Heat, Ine, 2004 UT 72, 51, 99 P.3d 801 ("[In order to preserve an issue for appeall,] the issue must be presented to the trial court in such a way that the trial court has an opportunity to rule on that issue. This requirement puts the trial judge on notice of the asserted error and allows for correction at that time in the course of the proceeding." (alterations in original) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); In re E.D., 876 P.2d 397, 401 (Utah Ct.App.1994) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, Timberline never made a request to
recognizing that appellate courts consistently refuse  to address issues  that are raised for the first time on appeal holding that generally appellate courts will not review an issue raised for the first time on appeal holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered holding that appellate court will not normally address issue raised for the first time on appeal holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal are reviewed for plain error