In its brief, the Attorney General refers to evidence of A.J.’s 2002 and 2003 income contained in the transcript of the prior trial. We also note that the trial transcript is included in the record on appeal because A.J. requested its inclusion. A.J.'s brief also cites to evidence from the trial transcript to support his arguments. We further note drat none of the parties filed any objections to our consideration of the testimony from that trial in this appeal. However, the testimony from the pri- or jury trial did not address A.J.’s annual wages in 2004 or 2005. The trial court’s error, if any, in relying on the testimony from the hearing of a related proceeding is not argued by either party as constituting error. See Pat Baker Co., Inc. v. Wilson, 971 S.W.2d 447, 450 (Tex.1998) (<HOLDING>). Thus, whether the trial court erred in
holding that the court of appeals may not reverse a trial courts judgment in the absence of properly assigned error recognizing that appellate court may reverse trial courts judgment when it is based on an erroneous conclusion of law holding it is axiomatic that an appellate court cannot reverse a trial courts judgment absent properly assigned error holding appellate courts cannot reverse judgment  on grounds not raised on appeal holding that a claim is not properly before the appellate court because it is axiomatic that arguments not raised below are waived on appeal