is granted, then within thirty days after the decision on such rehearing, the applicant may appeal by petition to the supreme court. 5 . New Hampshire’s preference for thirty day statutes of limitation in appeals from administrative bodies is underscored in the planning and zoning context. RSA §§ 677:4 and 677:6 create a thirty day period for appealing zoning decisions of boards of adjustment or local legislative bodies. Similarly, RSA 677:15 mandates that appeals from land use planning board decisions be brought within thirty days. Like actions brought under EHA § 1415(e)(2), such appeals permit the introduction of additional evidence while giving deference to administrative findings. 6 . This view has been embraced explicitly in New York. Compare Adler v. Education Department, supra, (<HOLDING>) to Michael M. v. Board of Education, 686
holding that an action for consequential damages to property whether the action is brought in contract or in tort is an action for injury to property within the threeyear statute of limitations holding that the statute of limitations for an attorneys fees action under  1415e4b is three years holding that the statute of limitations on employees claim under 29 usc  411a is tolled by pursuit of internal union remedies despite fact that employee pursued such remedies for more than the four months required by statute holding that the running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense holding that the statute of limitations for an action under  1415e2 is four months