alleged that he again raped the victim on or about the Wednesday before Thanksgiving of 1989. Count four alleged that the defendant committed incest with the victim on or about the same date as count three, the Wednesday before Thanksgiving, 1989. Count five alleged that he committed incest with the victim on or about January 3, 1992. On the first day of the trial, October 12, 1993, the trial court conducted a jury-out hearing on the defendant’s motion to prohibit the State from introducing evidence of uncharged sexual misconduct. The defendant’s trial counsel argued that evidence of prior “bad acts” should be excluded under Tennessee Rule of Evidence 404(b), which generally prohibits the introduction of character evide Tenn.1994); Martin v. State, 584 S.W.2d 830 (Tenn.Crim.App.1979) (<HOLDING>), overruled by State v. Rickman, 876 S.W.2d 824
holding that evidence of uncharged incest with the same victim is admissible to illustrate the relationship existing between the defendant and the victim holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony holding that evidence of incest with the same victim prior to or after the offense charged is admissible to corroborate proof of the incident relied upon for conviction holding evidence of past uncharged sexual encounters admissible in child sexual abuse case to show relationship between defendant and alleged victim holding that uncharged sexual acts committed upon the same victim are admissible to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim and to corroborate the evidence of the offense charged in the indictment