reviewed on appeal from the final judgment. Id. at 451. Even the former client’s acquittal would not render the revocation order unreviewable at the conclusion of the underlying case. Id. Thus, the order was not appeal-able under the collateral order exception to the final judgment rule. Id. These cases establish that settlement of an underlying case does not preclude appellate review of an order disqualifying an attorney from further representation insofar as that order rests on grounds that could harm his or her professional reputation. We therefore conclude the appeal is not moot insofar as the district court’s order found that Attorney Greer had violated the Colorado Rules of Professional Conduct. See Kirkland v. National Mortgage Network, Inc., 884 F.2d 1367, 1370 (11th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). That the underlying cases were dismissed
holding challenge to order disqualifying attorney was not moot despite dismissal of underlying case where orders brand of disqualification on grounds of dishonesty and bad faith could hang over attorneys name and career for years holding that disqualification orders do not fall in the collateral order exception holding that a bad faith claim arises out of contract for attorney fee statute holding that a disqualification order in a criminal case is not appealable holding that although courts have inherent power to dismiss bad faith litigant  707a does not provide basis for dismissal on grounds of bad faith filing