garnishment Answer against the garnishee defendant that (a) awards those attorney fees and/or costs against the judgment debtor in favor of the judgment plaintiffs, or (b) awarding funds held by writ to the judgment plaintiffs (iv) in connection with attempts to collect debts incurred for personal, family, or household purposes (v) for the period prior to July 13, 1999, the date this action was filed, corresponding to the statute of limitations of the violated statute (one year for the FDCPA; four years for the WCPA and WCAA). A. Inclusion of the Affidavit Class in the Complaint Defendants assert that the Affidavit Class cannot be certified because it is beyond the scope and allegations of Plaintiffs’ complaint. Plaintiffs essentially reply that the Affidavit Class is included 1976) (<HOLDING>). The prerequisites of a class action are
holding that the filing of a class action by a class representative without standing tolls the period of limitations with regard to all asserted members of the class and that the amendment of the complaint by the addition of a class member with standing relates back to the original complaint holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory holding that it is elementary that in order to maintain a class action the class sought to be represented must be adequately defined and clearly ascertainable holding that to maintain a class action the existence of the class must be pleaded and the limits of the class must be defined with some specificity recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members