account noted on the attached statements); cf. Rutledge v. Gemini Capital Group, LLC, 327 Ga. App. 454, 456 (757 SE2d 893) (2014) (“[Appellee] provided an affidavit from its CEO, based on personal knowledge and properly authenticated business records attached to the affidavit, showing that [appellant] established a credit card account issued by Chase. The affidavit and supporting documents further show that Chase’s interest in the account was ultimately transferred to [appellee] and that [appellant] failed to pay the amounts listed on the statements issued to him and attached to the affidavit. This was sufficient to make a prima facie case supporting [appellee’s] suit on the account.”); Ware v. Multibank 2009-1 RES-ADC Venture, LLC, 327 Ga. App. 245, 248-49 (2) (758 SE2d 145) (2014) (<HOLDING>). 7 See Taquechel v. Chattahoochee Bank, 260
holding that affiant sufficiently authenticated records under georgias new evidence code when she after setting out her role and personal access to and knowledge of the records created and maintained by the appellee in the ordinary course of business and the appellees acquisition of the documents through a transfer referenced and authenticated the various documents attached to her affidavit as exhibits holding that documents that are created in the ordinary course of business or would have been created irrespective of litigation are not protected by the work product doctrine holding that documents that were not created by but that were received maintained and relied upon by a business are business records under  8036 recognizing a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents including judicial records and documents holding that foreign bank documents found inside a persons home were properly authenticated