in Counts II and III and arising under 15 U.S.C. § 1125 is “whether the defendant is passing off his goods or services as those of the plaintiff by virtue of substantial similarity between the two, leading to confusion on the part of potential customers.” See Sun-Fun Products, Inc. v. Suntan Research & Development, Inc., 656 F.2d 186, 191 (5th Cir.1981) (quoting Boston Professional Hockey Association v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc., 510 F.2d 1004, 1010 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 868, 96 S.Ct. 132, 46 L.Ed.2d 98 (1975)). “The touchstone under § 1125 is not similarity of the registered mark but similarity in the overall trade dress of the products.” See id. (citations omitted). See also Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Toy Loft, Inc., 684 F.2d 821, 831-32 (11th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). Trade dress involves the “total image of a
holding that same likelihood of confusion test applied in the context of trademarks also applies to certification marks holding that section 43a of the lanham act protects trade dress holding that the likelihood of confusion resulting from the defendants adoption of a trade dress similar to the plaintiffs the touchstone test for a violation of  1125 holding that even several isolated incidents of actual confusion are insufficient to support a finding of likelihood of confusion holding that concurrent use of same mark on similar product was sufficient to demonstrate a likelihood of confusion