to impute income to the wife for purposes of calculating child support. Huebscher v. Huebscher, 206 A.D.2d 295, 614 N.Y.S.2d 524 (N.Y.App.Div.1994). The New York court noted that, since there was no legal obligation to continue with the gifts, there was no guarantee they would be made in the future. Our legislature has not specifically defined “gift” as a source of income in calculating child support obligations. Instead, in Wyo. Stat. § 20-6-302 (1994), our legislature specifically has authorized the court to deviate from the presumptive child support calculations. We conclude the intent of the legislature was to afford a trial court flexibility in considering any and all sources of income before it calculates support obligations. See Pauling v. Pauling, 837 P.2d 1073 (Wyo.1972) (<HOLDING>). We conclude that, in Wyoming, the trial court
holding prior to adoption of child support guidelines that a credit was discretionary holding trial courts deviation from support guidelines in modifying an existing order refuted proposition the legislature enacted guidelines to curb the courts discretionary authority holding district courts are entitled to vary from the guidelines based on a policy disagreement with those guidelines recognizing impact of child support guidelines holding that the mere mandatory application of the guidelines  the district courts belief that it was required to impose a guidelines sentence  constitutes error