to investigate the possibility of other potential suspects that might have started the fire); and in State Farm Lloyds v. Johns, 1998 WL 548887, No. 05-96-01039-CV, at *3-4, (Tex. App—Dallas Aug. 31, 1998, no pet. h.), the insured submitted to her insurance company a conflicting expert opinion on the cause of her foundation damage and without further investigating the conflicting opinions rendered by the plaintiff s’ expert and the company’s expert, the company decided to nevertheless deny her claim. No such evidence of bad faith is present in this case. 53 . Nicolau, 951 S.W.2d at 448; Moriel, 879 S.W.2d at 17; National Union Fire Insurance Co., v. Dominguez, 873 S.W.2d 373, 376-77 (Tex.1994); Connolly v. Service Lloyds Ins. Co., 910 S.W.2d 557, 563 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1995, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Ramirez v. Transcontinental Ins. Co., 881
holding that organizations arranging charter flights operate very much like a carrier and should be treated as a carrier regardless of the label it applies to its business holding that the defendant did not establish good faith as a matter of law holding that the carrier established its good faith as a matter of law when summary judgment evidence demonstrated a bona fide controversy regarding the need for back surgery and the carrier relied on a report that surgery was not necessary holding that the trial court correctly entered summary judgment in favor of defendant and denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment where plaintiff failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that defendant breached its duty to act in good faith holding that carrier was entitled to summary judgment on claim regarding false statements that claimants were not entitled to coverage because the claim was limited to complaints about delays claim handling and disputes regarding entitlement to benefits