“the evidence or to determine a fact in issue.” Iowa R. Evid. 5.702. Second, the court must determine whether the witness is qualified to testify as an expert “by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education” on the subject matter in question. Id. “All expert witnesses must be qualified in the area of their testimony based on one of the five areas of qualification.” Ranes, 778 N.W.2d at 687. However, the witness need not ha cialist in the area of the testimony so long as the testimony is within the witness’s general area of expertise. Ranes, 778 N.W.2d at 687. Finally, a court can only determine whether an expert is qualified by considering the expert’s qualifications in the context of the issues to be determined by the trier of fact. Id.; see also Hutchison, 514 N.W.2d at 889 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we must determine whether Bolt
holding that class claims that fail to meet the requirements of rule 23 may be properly dismissed by granting a rule 12b6 motion holding that a defendant who files a legally insufficient rule 3850 motion for failing to meet pleading requirements should be allowed at least one opportunity to amend recognizing that those who fail to meet the standards of rule 5702 should not be allowed to testify even if they profess expertise on a subject holding that a plaintiff should be allowed to amend the complaint to add a claim recognizing rule