a major deficiency noted by the district court in its January 4, 1994, Order. Hughes’ supplemental affidavit supporting her 59(e) motion presented evidence that the same male sergeant who, was not disciplined for one unlocked door incident was also not disciplined when a second incident occurred while he was the sergeant on duty. In RGI, Inc. v. Unified Industries, Inc., 963 F.2d 658, 662 (4th Cir.1992), this Court held that a district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to consider a supplemental affidavit in .support of a 59(e) motion after the district court reasoned that the litigant had offered “no justified reason” why the additional material was not presented earlier. Accord Cray Communications, Inc. v. Novatel Computer Sys., Inc., 33 F.3d 390, 395-96 (4th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 1254, 131
holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to strike when movant failed to show prejudice holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for continuance when not in proper affidavit form holding that district court did not abuse discretion in denying 59e motion when litigants only justification for not presenting supplemental evidence earlier was that its lawyer thought it was unnecessary holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence where the evidence would serve only to impeach  testimony