and that his $2,397.20 per month in long-term disability income, his future earnings, and the personal property he was awarded in the divorce decree would enable him to keep Wife on his health insurance for two years and make her car payments for one year. In addition, the parties were in their ninth year of marriage when they divorced, and the evidence authorized the court to conclude that Wife’s misconduct, as alleged by Husband, was unintentional or did not warrant denial of the limited alimony she was awarded. Because there is some evidence in the record to support the award and it was not made pursuant to an erroneous legal analysis, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding Wife alimony. See Bloomfield v. Bloomfield, 282 Ga. 108, 108, 112 (646 SE2d 207) (2007) (<HOLDING>); Farrish v. Farrish, 279 Ga. 551, 552 (615
holding that family courts conclusions will not be set aside if supported by findings holding that a factfinders rulings will be upheld if supported by reasonable substantial and probative evidence on the record considered as a whole holding that a trial courts ruling on a motion for new trial will be upheld if it is correct on any applicable legal theory even if the court articulated an invalid basis holding that the trial courts factual findings related to alimony will be upheld on appeal if supported by   any evidence   holding that a district courts ruling may be upheld on an alternative ground supported by the record