See Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039, 1046, 77 L. Ed. 2d 405, 103 S. Ct. 2830 (1982); Matson, 260 Kan. at 374. An accused may waive Miranda rights by his or her own acts and words in initiating conversation with police. See State v. Strayer, 242 Kan. 618, 625, 750 P.2d 390 (1988). In Strayer, the defendant was arrested and read his Miranda rights. Strayer stated he understood his rights and would not discuss the specifics of the case with police. Strayer then began questioning the officers regarding his apprehension, and, during a lengthy conversation, made incriminating statements. The Strayer court held that Strayer waived his Miranda rights by his “own acts, words, and surrounding circumstances.” 242 Kan. at 625. See also State v. William, 248 Kan. 389, Syl. ¶ 15, 807 P.2d 1292 (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 837 (1991). The
recognizing that the sixth amendment guarantees a defendant the right to counsel and the right to waive counsel holding that a criminal defendant has a sixth amendment right to counsel at trial holding that the sixth amendment right to counsel embodies the right to effective assistance of counsel holding that there is a threepart analysis for determining whether a defendant who has initiated further conversation with police after invoking his right to remain silent has waived that right the three requirements are 1 that the defendant initiates further conversation 2 that the defendant is reminded of his or her rights and 3 that the defendant knowingly and voluntarily waives those rights a second time holding that when a defendant initiates contact with the police after an assertion of a sixth amendment right to counsel defendant waives that right and his or her statements are admissible