that shortcoming to defeat the plaintiffs claim. Morsani, 790 So.2d at 1077. As previously discussed, statutes of repose involve something more significant than a legal defect in a party’s case. While a statute of limitations precludes a remedy for the cause of action the plaintiff asserts, see Hess, 175 So.3d at 695, a statute of repose extinguishes that cause' of action altogether, see Bogorff, 583 So.2d at 1003. Such statutes thus erect an absolute bar to the assertion of the extinguished cause of action that is analogous to a jurisdictional statute of nonclaim. . See May, 771 So.2d at 1155 (quoting Comerica Bank & Trust, F.S.B. v. SDI Operating Partners, L.P., 673 So.2d 163, 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996)); Musculoskeletal Inst. Chartered v. Parham, 745 So.2d 946, 953 (Fla. 1999) (<HOLDING>). ' It would be incongruous with the conception
holding wrongful death action barred by 10year construction statute of repose holding that statute of repose was not subject to toiling provision applicable to statute of limitations because among other reasons it would ignore fundamental distinctions between ordinary statutes of limitations and statutes of repose holding that a statute of repose sets absolute parameters of any action holding that provision has the characteristics of a statute of repose holding that statute was one of repose because it embodies the most distinctive characteristic of a statute of repose the barring of the right to bring an action rather than the remedy prescribed