24 . Id. 25 . Utah Code Ann. § 77-32-305.5 (2003) (emphasis added). 26 . Id. 27 . Id. § 77-32-304.5(f) (2003). 28 . State v. Carreno, 2005 UT App 208, ¶¶ 9-10, 113 P.3d 1004 (citing State v. Hancock, 874 P.2d 132, 135-36 & n. 3 (Utah Ct.App.1994)). 29 . Hancock, 874 P.2d at 135 n. 3. 30 . Supra ¶¶ 13-15. 31 . Utah Code Ann. § 77-32-301(3) (2003). 32 . See Carreno, 2005 UT App 208, ¶ 10, 113 P.3d 1004 (emphasis added). 33 . See id. 34 . State v. Robbins, 709 P.2d 771, 773 (Utah 1985); accord State v. Cramer, 2002 UT 9, ¶ 28, 44 P.3d 690 ("[I]f an appellant fails to provide an adequate record on appeal, this court must assume the regularity of the proceedings below.”). 35 . Carreno, 2005 UT App 208, ¶ 10, 113 P.3d 1004. 36 . See Barney v. State, 698 S.W.2d 114, 126 (Tex.Crim.App.1985) (<HOLDING>). 37 . See Roberts v. State, 252 Ga. 227, 314
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendants motion for additional funds where defendant had not shown exhaustion of the 500 granted holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing holding that district court had not abused its discretion in denying plaintiffs motion to amend complaint holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying motion for continuance when not in proper affidavit form holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to strike when movant failed to show prejudice