541 A.2d 1029 (1988); Kolitch v. Lindedahl, 100 N.J. 485, 492, 497 A.2d 183 (1985). Although the majority acknowledges that liability provisions cannot take precedence over specifically-granted immunities, ante at 57-60, 648 A 2d at 708-09, it departs from that well-established principle by ignoring the immunity granted public entities under N.J.SA 59:4-5. II The plain language of N.J.SA 59:4-5 discloses that the immunity set forth in that statute clearly and unambiguously applies to a public entity’s failure to replace a missing stop sign. That statute provides: “Neither a public entity nor a public employee is liable under this chapter for an injury caused by the failure to provide ordinary traffic signals ; Johnson v. Township of Southampton, 157 N.J.Super. 518, 525, 385 A.2d 260 (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 77 N.J. 485, 391 A.2d 499
holding that a municipality is immune from punitive damages under 42 usc  1983 holding that a railroad operated and owned by the federal government was immune from antitrust liability recognizing that a judge is not absolutely immune from criminal liability holding municipality immune from liability under njsa 5945 for failure to mark intersection partially obstructed by trees and other vegetation holding that department of transportation was immune from liability under njsa 5945 for failing to replace missing sign warning motorists of low overpass