738 F.3d 1253, 1257 (11th Cir.2013). Those five requirements are: (1) throughout the petitioner’s sentencing, direct appeal, and first § 2255 proceeding, this Court’s precedent had specifically and squarely foreclosed the claim raised in the § 2241 petition; (2) after the petitioner’s first § 2255 proceeding, the Supreme Court overturned that binding precedent; (3) that Supreme Court decision applies retroactively on collateral review; (4) as a result of that Supreme Court decision applying retroactively, the petitioner’s current sentence exceeds the statutory maximum; and (5) the savings clause of § 2255(e) reaches his claim. See id. at 1274. We do not address all five requirements because doing so is not necessary to decide this case. Jeanty fails to satisfy the third th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). If Apprendi’s rule is not retroactive on
holding that booker does not apply retroactively to collateral proceedings under  2255 holding the apprendi rule does not apply retroactively in the context of a  2241 petition holding that because apprendi does not apply retroactively neither does blakely holding that apprendi does not retroactively apply to  2255 motions holding that apprendi does not retroactively apply to  2241 petitions