of Torts § 159. See also In re MTBE Prods. Liab. Litig., 379 F.Supp.2d at 348. 128 . See Blaen Avon Coal Co. v. McCulloh, 59 Md. 403, 419 (1883). 129 . See Rockland Bleach & Dye Works Co. v. H.I. Williams Corp., 242 Md. 375, 219 A.2d 48, 55 (1966) (noting that where surface water that invades plaintiff's property is "accompanied by large quantities of mud and other debris” an action in trespass would lie) (citing Cahill v. Baltimore City, 48 A. 705 (Md.1901); Guest v. Commissioners of Church Hill, 90 Md. 689, 45 A. 882 (1900)). 130 . See id. 131 . See Maryland Heights Leasing, Inc., 706 S.W.2d at 225. 132 . Yarema, 516 A.2d at 1004. 133 . Rosenblatt, 642 A.2d at 188. 134 . Id. at 189. 135 . Id. at 185 (quoting Restatement (Second) of Torts § 519). Accord Yommer, 257 A.2d at 141 (<HOLDING>). 136 . Rosenblatt, 642 A.2d at 186. 137 .
holding that the doctrine of strict liability applies where an owner of residential property brought a claim against the owners of a gasoline station immediately adjacent to a private residence after gasoline leaked into the property owners well holding that all property owners affected by a residential use permit are necessary parties holding that the property owners testimony alone placed the value of the stolen property above the amount necessary to constitute grand larceny holding that the state is obligated to pay property owners when it regulates private property under its police power in such a manner that the regulation effectively deprives the owner of the economically viable use of that property holding that the property owners duty of reasonable care included maintaining the automatic doors into the building and concluding that disputes of material fact remained as to the property owners constructive notice that the automatic doors were closing too quickly