. Plaintiff indicated that she required her husband's help only in lifting heavy grocery items. 145 . Dr. Yarosh’s report contains the following statement: "Dr. Confer does not see [plaintiff] as permanently and totally disabled and does not know what to make of her symptoms of selective cognitive dysfunction." CNA2-140. Plaintiff "strenuously objects" to this statement as inadmissible hearsay. The court need not address plaintiff's objection, however, because even without considering the alleged hearsay, there is no evidence in the record to show that Dr. Confer considered plaintiff to be disabled. Dr. Confer never directly gave an opinion about plaintiff's disability status, one way or another. See Horton v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co., 141 F.3d 1038, 1040 (11th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). 146 . For example, her "immediate memory”
holding that the board properly placed the burden of proving entitlement to benefits on the applicant holding that a plaintiff in an erisa denial of benefits case bears the burden of proving her entitlement to contractual benefits holding that erisa benefits are not property of the estate recognizing that the party seeking attorney fees bears the burden of proving entitlement to those fees holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa