the language of § 523(a)(4) does not track precisely that of its predecessor, 11 U.S.C. § 35(a)(4) (§ 17(a)(4) of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898), repealed and reenacted as amended (by Pub.L. No. 95-598, 92 Stat. 2590 (1978)) at 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(4), decisions construing the previous section are equally applicable to § 523(a)(4). Boyle, 819 F.2d at 587. 7 . Boyle, 819 F.2d at 587-88. 8 . See Angelle v. Reed (In re Angelle), 610 F.2d 1335, 1339 (5th Cir.1980). 9 . Id. at 1338. 10 . Chapman v. Forsyth, 43 U.S. (2 How.) 202, 11 L.Ed. 236, 238 (1844). 11 . id. 12 . Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co., 293 U.S. 328, 333, 55 S.Ct. 151, 154, 79 L.Ed. 393, 391-98 (1934). 13 . Id. 14 . Angelle, 610 F.2d at 1341. 15 . Id. 16 . See Southwest Airlines Co. v. Bullock, 784 S.W.2d 563, 568 (Tex.App.1990) (<HOLDING>). 17 . Angelle, 610 F.2d at 1341. 18 . Tex.
holding valid administrative rules promulgated by agency acting within its statutory authority have force and effect of legislation holding that administrative implementation of a particular statutory provision qualifies for chevron deference when it appears that congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force of law and that the agency interpretation claiming deference was promulgated in the exercise of that authority holding that an unpublished bia decision that does not rely on precedent for its definition of a contested term does not receive chevron deference because it is not promulgated under the agencys authority to make rules carrying the force of law holding board cannot ignore the rules it adopts under the delegation of authority to prescribe rules for its governance and the governance of the university because such rules have the force and effect of statute holding that the power of any administrative agency to reconsider its final decision exists only where the statutory provisions creating the agency indicate a legislative intent to permit the agency to carry into effect such power