Oct. 29, 1998). Critical impact exists where the district court dismisses a complaint for lack of probable cause. Id. at 6. Respondent has conceded that the district court’s dismissal of count one for lack of probable cause will have a critical impact on the outcome of trial. The issue of first impression before this court is whether the felony murder rule permits felon in possession or possession of a stolen firearm to be used as predicate offenses to felony murder. Because this issue is a question of law, ap-pealable under Minn. R.Crim. P. 28.04, subd. 1(1), this court must review it de novo. See State v. Linville, 598 N.W.2d 1, 2 (Minn.App.1999) (reviewing statutory interpretation underlying dismissal for lack of probable cause); State v. Murphy, 545 N.W.2d 909, 914 (Minn.1996) (<HOLDING>). The Minnesota felony murder statute provides:
holding statutory interpretation is subject to de novo review recognizing that the constitutionality of a statute is a question of law subject to de novo review holding that whether a statute has been properly construed is a question of law subject to de novo review holding that the question whether a party has agreed to submit an issue to arbitration is a question of law requiring de novo review holding that whether a statute affects sentencing is a question of law subject to de novo review