court ordered Father to pay a percentage of the remainder of his irregular income on a periodic basis. We cannot say that the trial court's finding regarding Mother and Father's weekly gross income is clearly erroneous. To the extent that Mother is challenging the inclusion of her irregular income in the calculation of her weekly gross income, she has waived that argument on appeal. When Mother submitted her child support worksheet to the trial court, she expressly recommended to the trial court that her overtime pay be included in her weekly gross income. Thus, any error Mother alleges to exist in the trial court's inclusion of irregular income in her weekly gross income is invited error and not reviewable on appeal. In re Adoption of B.C.S., 793 N.E.2d 1054, 1061 (Ind.Ct.App.2003) (<HOLDING>). In calculating Father's weekly gross income,
holding that where counsel failed to articulate below the arguments they urged on appeal regarding sufficiency of the evidence the arguments were waived holding that arguments not raised before the trial court are waived holding appellants waived arguments regarding trial courts consideration of hearsay documents when they offered two of them for admission themselves holding that we would not review a claim of error regarding the admission of evidence when the defendant stipulated to its admission at trial holding that defendant waived error of admission of hearsay testimony when he elicited it himself