or irregularity and he may not raise the objection on appeal or in any other post-conviction proceeding. See Proctor, 967 S.W.2d at 844 (stating that "[bjefore trial, a defen 9 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (quoting House Study Group Special Legislative Report # 120, dated August 23, 1985). 30 . Id. at 271. 31 . See State v. Turner, 898 S.W.2d 303, 306-OS (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (article 1.14(b) waiver rule applies to complaints concerning limitations defect in indictment). 32 . See id.; see also State v. Yount, 853 S.W.2d 6, 8 (Tex.Crim.App.1993) (concluding that an indictment which charges the commission of an offense barred by limitations still confers jurisdiction on trial court; thus, defendant must bring defects to trial court’s attention to preserve error). Cf. Proctor, 967 S.W.2d at 844 (<HOLDING>). 33 . It is arguable that, after Proctor, the
holding that a defendant who fails to raise statute of limitations defense in a pretrial motion to dismiss or by requesting a jury instruction on limitations if there is some evidence that the prosecution is limitationsbarred waives that defense holding that a statute of limitations defense first raised in a motion to dismiss at the close of the plaintiffs evidence was untimely holding that the running of the statute of limitations is an affirmative defense holding that defendants failure to assert the defense in any pretrial motions did not waive defendants limitations defense because the assertion of a limitations defense in the answer preserved defendants right to raise the defense both during the first trial and before the second holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense