by a motion to accomplish this result filed by an adverse party....’ ” Med. Waste Assocs., 327 Md. at 612, 612 A.2d 241 (quoting Morris, 278 Md. at 423, 365 A.2d 34). A party can abandon his or her status as a party by failing to file a responsive pleading to a petition for judicial review. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Ins. Comm’r, 283 Md. 663, 668-69, 392 A.2d 1114 (1978); Morris, 278 Md. at 423, 365 A.2d 34. In our view, the same is true of a would-be petitioner. If there are multiple parties on one side at the administrative level, and one of the parties files a petition for judicial review, another party could abandon her status as a party by failing to file a petition. See Egloff v. County Council of Prince George’s County, 130 Md.App. 113, 128-34, 744 A.2d 1083 (2000) (<HOLDING>). J.T.W.’s petition for judicial review names
holding that even where postconviction petitioner reserved the option to file an amended petition in his opening petition simply filing an amended petition is insufficient to request leave to file an amended petition a motion for leave to file an amended petition was required before it was necessary for the district judge to consider the amended petition holding that a party to an administrative proceeding failed to effectively obtain judicial review where the party filed a response to another partys petition rather than a separate petition holding that a petitioner may amend a habeas petition rather than filing a second or successive petition when the first petition has not yet reached a final decision holding that where defendant erroneously filed a request for declaratory relief in criminal action rather than filing an independent action for judicial review we would evaluate sufficiency of pleading as a petition for judicial review holding that a habeas petition filed more than 30 days after the effective date of the real id act cannot be transferred to the court of appeals as a petition for review for lack of jurisdiction