the top of the trailer, where there was a danger that the employee would fall into the trailer. In fact, it appears that the only person to ever see a Cagles employee on the trailer, Hankinson, was assured that an employee should not be on the trailer; he never saw another employee on the trailer. Warren argues that the OSHA citations indicate that the coemployees should have known that, to a substantial certainty, injury or death would result from the top-loading procedure. The citation concerning the failure to guard the openings on the trailer was not a repeat citation, so the coemployees could not have had any advance notice of the likelihood of injury before the issuance of that citation. See Ex parte Martin, 733 So.2d 392, 396 (Ala. 1999). Although some of the citations ari 1991) (<HOLDING>). We therefore conclude that Warren’s evidence
holding that injury in a parking lot did not occur on a covered situs holding that immunity is not waived for injury or death caused by negligent supervision holding postaccident citation not sufficient to support finding that coemployee was substantially certain that injury or death would occur holding that order finding that injury arose out of and in the course of the employment and awarding medical benefits was interlocutory order that would not support appeal holding that preaccident citation would not support a finding that coemployees were substantially certain that injury or death would occur