... student’s home as possible, except when a student elects to attend a school elsewhere....” Id. § 32.4(p). Whether the federal government’s responsibility for Indian education is based on a legal obligation arising out of its trust relationship with Indian peoples, or a moral obligation that it has voluntarily assumed, compare, e.g., 25 U.S.C.A. §§ 450(a) & 2501 (concluding from its “careful review of the Federal government’s historical and special legal relationship with” American Indians that the United States has “resulting responsibilities to” Indians, particularly in the area of education), and 25 C.F.R. § 32.3 (“the Federal Government has a direct interest, as trustee, in protecting Indian ... children, including their education”) (emphasis added), with 25 U.S.C.A. § 1901 (<HOLDING>), the United States clearly has an obligation
holding that congress which regulated the introduction of alcoholic beverages in indian country could validly delegate to indian tribes its authority to regulate that subject matter because indian tribes themselves possessed independent authority over the subject matter recognizing the federal responsibility to indian people and finding that congress has assumed the responsibility for the protection and preservation of indian tribes and their resources none of which is more vital  than their children recognizing the inherent power of indian tribes  to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all indians holding that federal legislation with respect to indian tribes  is not based upon impermissible racial classifications and noting that article i  8 of the constitution gives congress the power to regulate commerce  with the indian tribes recognizing that many though not all indian tribes make tribal court remedies available for claims against their governments