subsidiary of Astoria Federal. See 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(7)(D) ("[I]f a savings association, a subsidiary thereof, or any savings and loan affiliate or entity ... that is regularly examined or subject to examination by the Director, causes to be performed for itself, by contract or otherwise, any service authorized by this chapter ... whether on or off its premises — (i) such performance shall be subject to regulation and examination by the Director to the same extent as if such services were being performed by the savings association on its own premises ...”); see also 12 C.F.R. 559.3(n)(1) ("State law applies to operating subsidiaries only to the extent it applies to [a federal savings and loan association]."); cf. State Farm Bank v. Reardon, 539 F.3d 336, 345-46 (6th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); accord State Farm Bank, F.S.B. v. Burke, 445
holding in non  17200 case that the exclusive remedy for violations of the state and federal wage and hour laws is flsa holding that hola preemption does not apply to wells fargo because it is not a federal savings association holding that congress use of requirement evinced an intent for broad preemption of state tort laws holding that removal is proper based on complete preemption only when congress intended the federal cause of action to be exclusive holding that hola preemption applies to state laws targeting the activities of exclusive agents of federal savings associations