Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to “nudge [its RICO continuity] claim[] across the line from conceivable to plausible.” As did Twombly, this case involves a federal statute under which there is significant risk, absent careful review at the motion-to-dismiss stage of proceedings, of plaintiffs transforming garden-variety commercial disputes into something significantly more burdensome to the opposing party simply by invoking certain labels in a complaint. Despite Plaintiffs general allegations that there was a continuous and ongoing pattern of rack raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of the “ ‘long-term criminal conduct’ that RICO is intended to redress.” Disandro-Smith & Assocs., P.C. v. Edron Copier Serv., Inc., 722 F.Supp. 912, 916 (D.R.I.1989) (<HOLDING>). The allegations in the complaint do not
holding that the fact that defendants sales in forum were less than 5 percent of its total sales volume was irrelevant so long as its sales were part of a regular course of dealing and were not isolated or exceptional events holding in addition that offense of obstructing a law enforcement officer did not meet therein element of burglary holding that exercising general jurisdiction over defendant was improper where its actual sales in florida were a small percentage of the total sales and therefore these sales were de minimis  holding that three sales of used copy machines as new within approximately two years did not meet the continuity element holding that failure to deliver a copy of search warrant and itemized copy of the warrant return to defendant in absence of showing of injury reveals no error