with the authority to delegate the task of soliciting and marketing its mortgage products to exclusive agents. It is undisputed that State Farm Bank’s exclusive agents are subject to regulation and oversight by the OTS. According to 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(7)(D), “if a savings association ... causes to be performed for itself, by contract or otherwise, any service authorized under this chapter ... (i) such performance shall be subject to regulation and examination by the [OTS] to the same extent as if such services were being performed by the savings association on its own premises.” Additionally, 12 U.S.C. § 1464(d)(l)(B)(ii) requires that a federal savings association provide the OTS with “prompt and complete access” to its agents for regulatory purposes. See also Ayotte, 488 F.3d at 535 (<HOLDING>). Having concluded that State Farm Bank
holding that states may exercise their supervisory power to take custody of bank savings deposits recognizing that the hola and the ots permit federal savings associations to delegate their banking power to thirdparty agents recognizing that state constitution imposes more stringent limitations on power of state to inquire into lawful associations and speech than those imposed by federal constitution recognizing a distinction between the power of a federal court to hear statelaw claims and the discretionary exercise of that power holding that the federal power act did not evince an intent to permit states to prohibit export of hydroelectric power out of state