lacked jurisdiction to sua sponte amend its February 6 sentencing order after Moran had filed a notice of appeal. A court may modify a final, appealable order within 30 days after its entry if no appeal from the order has been taken. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5505. Once a notice of appeal has been filed, the trial court generally lacks jurisdiction to modify its sentence. See id.; Pa.R.A.P. 1701(a). Under limited circumstances, however, a court may modify an order after an appeal has been filed to correct a patent or obvious mistake or to supply defects or omissions in the record. See Pa.R.A.P. 1701(b)(1); Commonwealth v. Klein, 566 Pa. 396, 781 A.2d 1133, 1135 (2001); Manack v. Sandlin, 812 A.2d 676, 681 (Pa.Super.2002). But see Commonwealth v. Haughwout, 816 A.2d 247, 249-50 (Pa.Super.2003) (<HOLDING>). ¶7 Here, the trial court amended its original
holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal because it was filed before the final order awarding attorneys fees holding trial court lacked jurisdiction to reduce defendants sentences and order his release from incarceration after notice of appeal was filed holding that this court lacked jurisdiction to review a fed rcrimp 35 motion to reduce sentence because the notice of appealmotion for reconsideration was not timely filed holding that court lacked jurisdiction on appeal from injunction because the order was simply an interpretation of an earlier order holding that trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendants motion to withdraw guilty plea filed beyond term of court in which defendant was sentenced