that the statute of limitations for class action members’ claims was tolled during the pendency of the class action); Munsterman v. Ill. Agric. Auditing Ass’n, 106 Ill.App.3d 237, 62 Ill.Dec. 125, 435 N.E.2d 923, 925-26 (1982) (citing American Pipe and agreeing that the plaintiffs action was tolled during the pendency of a class action; the statute of limitations clock restarted when the class action was dismissed); Arnold v. Dirrim, 398 N.E.2d 426, 439-40 (Ind.Ct.App.1979) (citing American Pipe and determining that filing of amended complaint, which sought to bring class action, constituted filing by all persons subsequently found to be class members, so that certain class members were not barred by statute of limitations); Lucas v. Pioneer, Inc., 256 N.W.2d 167, 180 (Iowa 1977) (<HOLDING>); Waltrip v. Sidwell Corp., 234 Kan. 1059, 678
holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members holding that putative class members are not parties to an action prior to class certification holding that the filing of a class action by a class representative without standing tolls the period of limitations with regard to all asserted members of the class and that the amendment of the complaint by the addition of a class member with standing relates back to the original complaint holding that claims of parties properly members of the class who timely intervene in the proceedings below  shall be deemed brought for limitation purposes when the appropriate defendant was legally served in the original litigation