wages in an employer’s hands are exempt from garnishment under Section 8127 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa. C.S. § 8127, there is a specific exception “[f]or restitution to crime victims, costs, [or] fines ... pursuant to an order entered by a court in a criminal proceeding.” 42 Pa.C.S. § 8127(a)(5). Further, this Court has recognized that [i]t has long been settled that an inmate at a correctional facility is not an employee of the correctional facility because there is no employer/employee relationship as an inmate’s labor belongs to the prison, and the remuneration paid to the inmate is a gratuitous payment authorized by the state as a rehabilita-five tool rather than wages. Heffran v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 863 A.2d 1260, 1263 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) aff'd, 584 Pa. 540, 886 A.2d 222 (2005) (<HOLDING>); see also Mays v. Fulcomer, 122 Pa.Cmwlth.
recognizing that the ford standard requires only that an inmate know the fact of his impending execution and the reason for it holding that an inmate was not an employee with standing to file a complaint for violations of the worker and community rightto know act holding employers thirdparty complaint seeking indemnity from employee for alleged flsa violations was preempted recognizing that the survivor of a deceased federal employee has no standing to file an eeo complaint on behalf of that former employee but personal representative of deceased employee can be substituted as plaintiff if deceased employee initiated complaint prior to death holding reasonable an agency determination that a request for an investigative file did not include the employment file