Court simply lacks jurisdiction to review the VA’s handling and processing of [Plaintiffs] benefits claims. Whether the VA’s procedures caused unlawful or unconstitutional delays in the administration of veterans benefits are questions within the exclusive jurisdiction of’ the VA, as established by the VJRA. Id. Because this court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiffs benefits claims, those claims are due to be dismissed. B. Plaintiff Has Not Exhausted the Necessary Administrative Remedies for His Medical Negligence and Any Employment Claims Plaintiff also advances claims for what appear to be medical negligence and employment discrimination by thé VA. These claims are separate and distinct from his claims for benefits and are not governed by the VJRÁ. See Shinseki, 678 F.3d at 1023 (<HOLDING>); see also generally Slater, 175 Fed.Appx. 300
holding that va lenders handbook and va circulars do not have the force and effect of the law holding that district courts could consider ftca claims alleging negligence against va doctors because it would not have any effect on benefits holding that it could not disregard the express pleadings alleging negligence by specific parties holding petition alleging negligence was a personal action holding that expert report that sufficiently addressed certain claims against doctor employed by professional association was sufficient as to claims against professional association based on doctors negligence because the doctors negligence is imputed to the association under the professional association act