Mergens, 496 U.S. 226, 235, 110 S.Ct. 2356, 2864, 110 L.Ed.2d 191 (1990); Widmar, 454 U.S. at 274-75, 102 S.Ct. at 277. This court also has regularly noted that maintaining a neutral policy avoids establishment of religion difficulties. See Hedges, 9 F.3d at 1299 (finding no neutrality in school district’s suppression of private speech); Sherman v. Community Consol. Sch. Dist. 21, 8 F.3d 1160, 1165 (7th Cir.1993) (finding evenhanded treatment of religious and nonreligious youth groups), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 114 S.Ct. 2109, 128 L.Ed.2d 669 (1994); American Jewish Congress v. City of Chicago, 827 F.2d 120, 124 (7th Cir.1987) (stating principle that government should not favor one religion over another religion or over non-religion); see also Good News/Good Sports Club, 28 F.3d at 1510 (<HOLDING>). In Rosenberger, the Supreme Court, through
holding that a university creates a public forum when it makes its facilities generally available to registered student groups holding that a school district owed the highest degree of care to a student on a school bus such that the district could be liable for the sexual abuse of the student by the school bus driver holding that school policy did not advance religion but established a neutral forum for community and student groups to engage in exchange of ideas holding that exclusion of religious groups from universitys open forum policy violated the first amendment holding that where a high school student and the students mother received adequate notice of the charges had sufficient opportunity to prepare for the meeting with school personnel were accorded an orderly hearing and were given a fair and impartial decision no due process violation occurred even though the school failed to provide advance notice that the potential disciplinary actions included a transfer to another school