banks and the like, including five plaintiffs (see Pls.' Resp. to FDIC Joint Stmt. ¶ 17; Pls.' Mot. for Summ. J. against FDIC-R at 29 n.27), are exempt from this requirement; their funds need only be held overnight. 12 C.F.R. § 204.8(a)(2)(i)(A).) This purported regulatory noncompliance leads, in FDIC-R’s estimation, to the conclusion that the non-bank plaintiffs’ funds must be categorized as IBFs. (See FDIC-R's Mot. for Summ. J. at 10). Whether CBC violated federal regulations by failing to hold certain plaintiffs’ funds for less than the required period is of no significance, however, for any failure by the bank to com ply with regulations governing IBFs is the responsibility of CBC and the FDIC as its receiver; it cannot be attributed to plaintiffs. See, e.g., 12 C.F.R. 204.8(e) (<HOLDING>); cf. Dir., Office of Thrift Supervision v.
holding that  9613f1 is the exclusive vehicle for responsible parties to obtain contribution from other responsible parties holding that a plaintiff who alleged that bank of america was responsible and liable for the actions of countrywide and who pled no facts beyond the purchase of countrywide by bank of america had failed to plead sufficient facts to support a claim against the bank holding as responsible for mismanagement of an ibf only the bank itself holding the defendant properly convicted of multiple counts of armed robbery against bank employees even though the defendant robbed only the bank holding plaintiff responsible for attorney error