form, but the declarations page does unambiguously incorporate the proposal form. The declarations page provides, “These Declarations, along with the endorsements (if any) and the completed and signed Proposal Form shall constitute the contract between the Insured and Insurer.” Great American Declarations, p. 2. The declarations thus specifically incorporate the proposal form, which in turn specifically incorporates the financial statements. And to take one step back, the excess policy expressly refers to the declarations in defining coverage. See Great American Excess Policy, §§ II.A, VI.A, VI.D. Moreover, Ohio courts follow the well-accepted rule that the declarations to an insurance contract are considered part of the policy. See Davidson, 87 Ohio App.3d at 104, 621 N.E.2d at 889 (<HOLDING>); Hannenmann v. State Farm Ins. Companies, No.
holding that the first prong of the boggs test is satisfied when as here the policy includes an application that contains unambiguous language linking back to the policy holding that where claimant complained of a problem and showed defendant a rusty part the requirement of notice was satisfied for a claim of breach of the warranty of fitness holding that even though some of employees duties appeared to satisfy the directly related element the element was not satisfied where those duties were not part of his primary duty holding that first part of boggs test was satisfied where purported warranty language appeared in the declarations to the policy holding that warranty claim accrued at tender where 180 day warranty on computer not a warranty for future performance as it involved a remedy only