Inc. v. Dickinson, 598 S.W.2d 714, 717 (Tex.Civ.App.-Corpus Christi 1980, writ refd n.r.e.)). 66 . Tex.R. Civ. P. 279. 67 . Id. 68 . Tex.R. Civ. P. 299; see also Wisdom v. Smith, 146 Tex. 420, 209 S.W.2 1, pet. granted) (same). 72 .The jury was instructed only that "[t]he same ten or more of you must agree upon all of the answers made and to the entire verdict.” As can be seen from the S.W.2d 729, 734-35 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1986, writ ref'd n.r.e.). 78 . In re J.M.S., 43 S.W.3d 60, 62-63 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.). 79 . Tex Fam.Code § 107.103. 80 . In re B.L.D., 56 S.W.3d 203, 211-12 (Tex.App.-Waco 2001, pet. granted). 81 . In re Oghenekevebe, 123 N.C.App. 434, 473 S.E.2d 393, 396 (Ct.App.1996) (basing right on a statute); In re A.R.S., 480 N.W.2d 888, 891 (Iowa 1992) (<HOLDING>); In re Adoption of T.M.F., 392 Pa.Super. 598,
holding that pennsylvanias test for ineffective assistance of counsel is not contrary to strickland holding that in parental termination proceedings the parent is entitled to effective assistance of counsel holding that the test for ineffective assistance of counsel in termination cases is generally the same as in criminal proceedings holding that ineffective assistance of counsel claims should be brought in collateral proceedings not on direct appeal recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel