L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), the United States Supreme Court stated that not every encounter between a policeman and a citizen is a seizure. 392 U.S. at 19 n. 16, 88 S.Ct. at 1878 n. 16. “Only when the officer, by means of physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen may we conclude that a ‘seizure’ has occurred.” Id. Further, the Supreme Court stated in INS v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210, 104 S.Ct. 1758, 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984): What is apparent from [Florida v.] Royer, [460 U.S. 491, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) ] and Brown [v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 99 S.Ct. 2637, 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) ] is that police questioning, by itself, is unlikely to result in a Fourth Amendment violation. While most citizens will respond to a police request, (10th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Rather than concluding that Appellee was
holding that a traffic stop is reasonable under the fourth amendment when police have probable cause to believe a traffic infraction has occurred holding that traffic stop ceases to become a detention and becomes a consensual encounter when police officer returns license and registration unless driver has objectively reasonable cause to believe that he or she is not free to leave holding that a police officer may stop a driver where the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion regarding the commission of a civil traffic violation holding that detention ended when police officer returned drivers license and registration and driver voluntarily consented to additional questioning holding that a police officer who approaches a parked car and questions its occupants has not shown sufficient authority to cause a reasonable person to believe that he or she is not free to leave