or defect, the court will conduct a hearing. If the court determines that Billy Terrell Adams is no longer affected by mental disease or defect, the court will immediately discharge Billy Terrell Adams.” This instruction is required pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-2-312(a)(2), which provides that, when the affirmative defense of mental disease or defect is presented to a jury, “the jury shall be instructed regarding the disposition of a defendant acquitted on a ground of mental disease or defect[.]” Because the prosecutor’s remark is consistent with the law, any objection raised by trial counsel would have been meritless. Therefore, counsel were not deficient for not objecting to the prosecutor’s comments. Lambert v. State, 2012 Ark. 150, 2012 WL 1130590 (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). Our review of the circuit court’s decision
holding that in order to carry his burden to demonstrate prejudice a petitioner must show when making a claim of ineffective assistance for failing to raise an objection or  poinake an argument that the objection or argument would have been successful if made holding an argument waived on appeal for failure to raise the issue in objection to the magistrates recommendation holding that an attorney is not ineffective for failing to make a meritless objection holding that to show prejudice in a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel the petitioner must show a reasonable probability that but for counsels errors the result of the proceeding would have been different holding that an appellant must not only specifically identify the deficiencies in counsels performance but also identify the specific objection that should have been made and provide authority in support of his argument that the objection would have been meritorious