requested are. reasonable in light of the complexity of the litigation and the number of counsel involved, and are therefore approved by the Court. Linney v. Cellular Alaska P’ship, No. C-96-3008 DLJ, 1997 WL 450064, at *7 (N.D. Cal. July 18, 1997). The Court does not find this case persuasive in light of its cursory discussion and the more recent and ERISA-specific authority cited above. The other three cases cited by Plaintiffs, ECF No. 153 at 19-20, support an award of non-taxable costs as part of a reasonable attorneys’ fee, but expert fees were not awarded—or addressed—in any of those cases. Redland Ins. Co., 460 F.3d at 1258-59 (allowing recovery in ERISA case of “reasonable charges for computerized research”); Grove v. Wells Fargo Fin. Cal., Inc., 606 F.3d 577 (9th Cir. 2010) (<HOLDING>); Langston v. N. Am. Asset Dev. Corp. Grp.
holding that postage charges and telecopy charges are not taxable costs holding that federal express costs telephone expenses and postage expenses did not qualify as taxable costs holding that  1920 does not authorize taxing mediation fees as costs holding that mediation costs are not compensable holding that fair credit reporting act allows nontaxable costs and remanding to district court to consider whether to award claimed nontaxable costs which included the cost of postage facsimiles travel mediation  services and video conferencing services used in depositions