and Mubarak-Assad averred that DENSO Japan “is a Japanese corporation.” Dweib also averred that DENSO Japan manufactured ECUs in “many of the subject vehicles” as follows: In another [Field Technical Report] from one of the technicians in Hong Kong, dated September 28, 2007, a similar [unintended acceleration] event was reported with a targeted investigation of the [ECU]. There were no DTCs [DTC is not defined] recorded and the root cause was unknown. The resulting report by [DENSO Japan], the manufacturer of the accelerator pedals in many of [the ECUs], confirmed that they could not find any abnormalities on any accelerator components. In the corresponding reply from [Toyota Motor Corporation], dated Apr Holding, LLC, 824 S.W.3d 840, 847 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2010, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, Hall pleaded allegations
holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute recognizing strong interest in protecting texas citizens where tort was committed in whole or in part in texas holding plaintiff was required to allege defendants committed fraudulent acts in texas to satisfy his initial burden of pleading jurisdictional facts holding plaintiffs allegation that defendants committed torts in houston texas was sufficient to bring defendants under the longarm statute for plaintiffs claims of various forms of fraud and negligent misrepresentation holding misrepresentation made by outofstate defendant to texas plaintiff who relied on it in texas satisfied requirement for jurisdiction under longarm statute based on commission of a tort in part in texas