is a tool often associated with drug distribution, see id. at 14; small, clear, plastic baggies are the standard vehicle of marijuana retail, see id. at 15; and the presence of hundreds of those baggies, and dozens missing, further indicates drug distribution, see id. “Intent to distribute can be proven circumstantially from, among other things, the quantity of [drugs] and the existence of implements such as scales commonly used in connection with the distribution of [drugs].” United States v. Poole, 878 F.2d 1389, 1392 (11th Cir. 1989). We have repeatedly held, consistent with Officer James’ testimony, that the items found on Mr. Swan circumstantially support a finding of possession with intent to distribute. Cf, e.g., United States v. Mercer, 541 F.3d 1070, 1076 (11th Cir. 2008) (<HOLDING>). .Accordingly, we hold that the district court
holding that a reputation for sobriety from drugs and alcohol is pertinent to the charge of possession of drug paraphernalia because intent to use is an element of the offense holding evidence of plastic jeweler bags together with drug ledger amount of drugs and lack of paraphernalia to consume drugs was sufficient to support jurys finding of intent to distribute and absence of money and digital scales was not outcome determinative in light of other evidence recognizing the absence of drug paraphernalia suggestive of personal use as evidence of an intent to distribute holding that defendants collective possession of plastic baggies beepers and scales  in conjunction with other evasive action  was sufficient evidence for jury to find conspiracy to distribute and possess cocaine beyond reasonable doubt holding the large quantity of drugs sufficient evidence of intent to distribute