is a lesser included offense of another). Furthermore, we note that the age requirements contained in each offense prevents recognition of assault on a female as a lesser included offense. For example, an indecent liberties conviction requires that the victim be under sixteen years old, and that the offender be at least sixteen years old and at least five years older than the victim. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202.1 (1993). In comparison, assault on a female requires that the offender be at least eighteen years old. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-33(b)(2) (1993). It follows that assault on a female is not a lesser included offense of taking indecent liberties with a child because assault on a female contains elements not present in the greater offense. See Weaver, 306 N.C. at 636, 295 S.E.2d at 379 (<HOLDING>). Based on the foregoing, we hold that the
holding that the defendant did not need to have physically touched the victim in order to be convicted of taking indecent liberties with a child in violation of ncgs  142021a2 holding that an offense is factually lesser included if the charging instrument alleges that the means used to commit the crime charged include all of the elements of the alleged lesser included offense holding that the crime of rape is a lesser included offense of the crime of felony murder in the perpetration of rape and that since the latter crime included all of the elements of the former consecutive sentences were therefore improper holding that taking indecent liberties with a child is not a lesser included offense of statutory rape given the differing age elements holding that the state felony offense of taking indecent liberties with a child categorically constituted a crime of violence for purposes of the career offender sentencing guidelines