persuasive, not binding. [D.E. 73]; see 11 Cir. R. 36-2, Unpublished Opinions (“unpublished opinions are not considered binding precedent, but they may be cited as persuasive authority”). In sum, the Bell court, relying solely on Turner Murphy, 659 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 1 DCA 1995), ignored a myriad of well thought out Florida court opinions that interpret these very issues, and to which this Court must defer. Mainly, Turner Murphy predates the Nadd v. Le Credit Lyonnais, S.A., 804 So.2d 1226 (Fla.2001) and Burshan v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA., 805 So.2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) line of cases, and ignores detailed Florida Supreme Court opinions that hold that the twenty (20) year statute of limitations applies. See B.A. Lott v. Padgett, 153 Fla. 304, 14 So.2d 667 (1943) (<HOLDING>); Young v. McKenzie, 46 So.2d 184 (Fla. 1950)
holding that the lien of a united states district court judgment was effective for twenty years holding that a chapter 13 debtor had standing to avoid a judgment lien to the extent of her exemption amount but not the entire judgment lien holding that sovereign immunity bars an attorneys lien against the united states holding that the fcia does not apply to a september 1981 judgment against the united states for interest accruing after the acts effective date holding that sovereign immunity does not bar extinguishment of united states junior lien in proceeding in which united states was not a party