against her, and to not incriminate herself. The trial court asked Nero if she was satisfied with her attorney, if she understood that she was pleading guilty and the sentence recommendation, and if everything put in front of her was explained to her. Nero testified that she has ADHD, but a mental evaluation found she did not suffer from any disability that would prevent her from knowing right from wrong and that she was competent to stand trial. Nero cites to Henderson v. Morgan, 426 U. S. 637 (96 SCt 2253, 49 LE2d 108) (1976), for the assertion that her guilty plea should be withdrawn because it was not explained to her during the plea hearing that she was being charged as a party to the crime or that she was responsible for what the others did during the robbery. Id. at 644-647 (II) (<HOLDING>). However, this Court has previously found that
holding that first and seconddegree intentional murder verdicts are consistent with a felony murder verdict because lack of intent is not an element of seconddegree felony murder holding that a statement implying that the defendant was guilty of the crime for which he was on trial was inadmissible hearsay holding a guilty plea involuntary where the record established that neither judge nor defense counsel explained to the accused an essential element of the offense and where the accused did not sufficiently admit to such element holding that where the record showed neither that the trial court explained to the defendant his right to a jury trial nor an effective waiver of the right structural error occurred holding where neither defense counsel nor the trial court explained to the defendant that intent to cause death was an element of seconddegree murder and there was no factual statement or admission implying intent the plea was involuntary