or name, author, recipient, subject matter of the record, case number, file designation, or reference number.” Id. If the DOJ component “determines that [such request] does not reasonably describe the records sought, the component shall inform the requester what additional information is needed or why the request is otherwise insufficient.” Id. As the D.C. Circuit recently held, such upfront procedures are permissible so long as they are “reasonable.” Clemente v. FBI, 867 F.3d 111, 119 (D.C. Cir. 2017). They clearly are in this case. Here, Justice concluded that the language “relate in any way to” certain Comey memos was too vague. Courts in this district have agreed with such an appraisals including in cases involving this same Plaintiff. See, e.g., Freedom Watch, 925 F.Supp.2d at 61 (<HOLDING>) (citation omitted); Shapiro v. CIA, 170
recognizing that intent of public records act is to provide all citizens with access to the records of all public governmental bodies holding request for  all records that relate to each subject area overbroad since life like law is a seamless web and all documents relate to all others in some remote fashion holding that subpoenas seeking any and all documents files and records reflecting or relating to the employment of each plaintiff were overly broad on their face holding the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances holding that a foia request should be read to seek all documents covered by a catchall