possible consequences of confessing the Department’s motion to terminate her parental relationship with N.A., I.S., and D.S. She explains that because the hearing affected her fundamental rights as a parent, she was entitled to a full advisement concerning the effect of her decision. While we have already affirmed that a natural parent has a “fundamental liberty interest in the care, custody and management of his or her child,” we have also held that the General Assembly has safeguarded this fundamental intex-est by enacting the Termination Act. B.B. v. People, 785 P.2d 132, 136 (Colo.1990). In B.B., we determined that the Termination Act fux1-thered “the legislative purposes of preserving and strengthening family ties whenever possible while still protecting the child’s welfare.” Id. (<HOLDING>). There, we also concluded that the detailed
recognizing that the integrity of the family unit has found protection in the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment recognizing that the duty has been applied to accountants holding that a claim under the equal protection section of section 19853 requires proof of classbased animus holding to the effect that a court must consider section 24 fifth in conjunction with the antidiscrimination provisions of the bankruptcy reform act of 1978 as amended which are codified at title 11 of the united states code recognizing that the pertinent protection has been codified under section 193604 6 crs 2003