opportunity to observe the demeanor during the witness’ testimony.” Good v. State, 723 S.W.2d 734, 736 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (en banc). 10 . While we discourage trial judges from waiting to rule as the thirteenth juror until the hearing on a motion for new trial, we acknowledge that a trial judge who tried the case may change his or her mind about the weight of the evidence upon further reflection and hearing argument at the motion for new trial hearing. Under those particular circumstances, the initial trial judge is not precluded from reversing his or her initial ruling. 11 . We reiterate that the defense has no obligation to present proof. 12 . We do not review the successor judge’s decision that the weight of the evidence supported the jury's verdicts. See Dankworth, 919 S.W.2d at 59
holding the appellate standard of review in fourth amendment search and seizure cases is limited to determining whether any evidence supports the trial courts finding and the appellate court may only reverse where there is clear error holding that a reviewing court has an obligation to satisfy itself of the jurisdiction of the court below holding that reviewing court may consider trial evidence in reviewing denial of motion to suppress holding that rule 33s thirteenth juror provision is mandatory and requires a trial judge to act as the thirteenth juror recognizing that the duty of an appellate court is limited to reviewing whether a trial court performed its obligation as the thirteenth juror and does not include reweighing or reassessing the evidence