affidavit that he is the vice president of the company formerly known as John Deere, and is the custodian of the records pertaining to this case. He further avers that the payment bond and contract offered as summary judgment evidence are true and correct copies of the bond and contract in issue in this case. Fondren offered no argument or summary judgment evidence to suggest this testimony is not clear, positive, direct, free from contradictions, and readily controvertible. See Casso v. Brand, 776 S.W.2d 551, 558 (Tex.1989) (“could have been readily controverted” means “testimony at issue can by its nature be effectively countered by opposing evidence”); Larson v. Family Violence & Sexual Assault Prevention Ctr. of S. Tex., 64 S.W.3d 506, 513 (Tex.App.Corpus Christi 2001, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). If Fondren had evidence to contradict
holding that an unsworn letter is not proper summary judgment proof holding affidavit attesting to authenticity of letter was proper summary judgment evidence holding that affidavit attesting to stipulated agreement between parties was sufficient to raise genuine issue of fact concerning affirmative defense holding that unsworn pleadings do not constitute proper summary judgment evidence holding that the time of discovery of fraud is not a proper matter for summary judgment