restrictions and limitations. Moreover, Dr. Lap-ing agreed that cardiologists, like Dr. Kurkjian, have more insight into the nature of Reagan’s chest pain and heart condition than he does. As for Reagan’s assertion that UNUM’s settlement offer lends credence to his claim, the Court need look no further than to Federal Rule of Evidence 408. Rule 408 provides: Evidence of (1) furnishing or offering or promising to furnish, or (2) accepting or offering or promising to accept, a valuable consideration in compromising or attempting to compromise a claim which was disputed as to either validity or amount, is not admissible to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim or its amount. Id.; see also New Burnham Prairie Homes, Inc. v. Village of Burnham, 910 F.2d 1474, 1482 (7th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); see also Kritikos v. Palmer, Johnson, Inc.,
holding it was not an abuse of discretion to exclude testimony recognizing district court application of the same rule holding that settlement documents were admissible under both section 90408 and federal rule of evidence 408 because the documents were offered not to establish liability but to establish violation of consumer credit laws holding rule 403 does not exclude all prejudicial evidence the rule focuses only on the danger of unfair prejudice holding that federal rule of evidence 408 authorizes the district court to exclude settlement letters