as a broker or as an employer of brokers during the time of the contractual relationship.” Aspero, 768 F.2d at 109; Fleck, 891 F.2d at 1053 (citing Aspero). On this basis, non-contractual tort claims for wrongful termination and post-termination defamation respecting an employee’s job performance have been held arbitrable under Rule 347 because they necessarily involve an evaluation of the employer’s or the employee’s performance during their employment relationship. See Fleck, supra; Zolezzi, supra, Aspero, supra; Morgan, supra. On the other hand, post-termination disputes whose resolution will require no such evaluation of the former employer-employee relationship have been found not arbitrable under Rule 347. See Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Ness, 677 F.Supp. 866, 870 (D.S.C.1988) (<HOLDING>); see also Morgan, 729 F.2d at 1168 (holding
holding that a cause of action for illegal arrest and false imprisonment accrued at the time plaintiff was released from his alleged illegal restraint and not when the proceedings by which his arrest occurred terminated holding that claims for false arrest and imprisonment under  1983 accrue at the time of the arrest holding that false arrest and false imprisonment claim were not duplicative holding disputes arising from former employees claims of false arrest and imprisonment following his arrest for unauthorized entry into former employers office not arbitrable under rule 347 holding that false arrest is one means of committing false imprisonment