occurring variances in dot intensities that cannot be predicted prior to the analysis, dot-intensity analysis disintegrates as a reliable and useful test.” Post at 169, 699 A.2d at 620-21. According to Dr. Shaler, the PM test of the box spring supported a calculation only of “all the second donor types which would be possible” to fill out the necessary alleles. Defendant also asserts that c t defendant’s challenge to techniques of RFLP analysis, including interpretation of autorads, concerns weight and not admissibility of DNA typing evidence under Frye); State v. Schweitzer, 533 N.W.2d 156, 160 (S.D.1995) (reasoning that DNA-expert’s conclusions regarding results of DNA test were issue of weight for jury to consider); State v. Kalakosky, 121 Wash.2d 525, 852 P.2d 1064, 1072 (1993) (<HOLDING>). As such, the ultimate determination of these
holding as to the admissibility of prior bad acts that allegedly took place fourteen and twelve years before the acts alleged in that case that the lapse of time between the defendants sexual acts    goes to the weight of the evidence not to its admissibility holding statistical conclusions admissible and questions regarding the size of a tests database goes to the weight not admissibility of the evidence recognizing if a person is qualified by learning and experience the lack of board certification or licensure goes to the weight of the experts testimony not its admissibility holding that allegations of tampering went to the weight of the evidence rather than to its admissibility holding that defendants assertions that specific laboratory procedures utilized to analyze dna sam pie were flawed goes to weight of evidence not admissibility