I question the majority’s assertion that article of incorporation X, giving the Board power to amend the bylaws, and bylaw article XVI, giving similar power to WEB members, conflict. The same principles which govern the construction of contracts govern the construction and interpretation of corporate bylaws. St. John’s, 90 S.D. at 679, 245 N.W.2d at 475. One such principle is that, whenever possible, contractual provisions will be construed harmoniously and effect given to all provisions. GMS, Inc. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc., 333 N.W.2d 442, 444 (S.D.1983). Therefore, the two provisions should be read as providing separate means by which either the membership or the Board may amend the WEB bylaws. See Phillips v. National Trappers Ass’n, 407 N.W.2d 609, 612 (Iowa App.1987) (<HOLDING>). * It appears from the record that a previous
holding that two minor references to a document protected by the deliberative process privilege were insufficient to establish adoption or incorporation holding that shareholder was liable under the law and contract because by the purchase of his stock he agreed and assented to liability as provided in the state constitution which was included in the articles of incorporation and thus created a contract on the part of the shareholders which followed them wherever they might go holding that the county board of commissioners does not have the power to intervene in the incorporation of a village if the citizens wishing to incorporate have complied with all the laws related to the incorporation holding that the law of the state of incorporation applies holding valid an amendment to articles of incorporation which created two methods by which members could amend bylaws