that it could also mean that Randle used cocaine about five days before being tested. (Hr’g Tr. 73-74.) 2 . Cue testified that his encounter with Randle occurred differently. According to him, Cue asked Randle at the metal detector where his keys were, Randle responded that he had walked, Cue cajoled him by saying “this is me you're talking to,” and then Randle confessed to lying. (Hr’g Tr. 32.) 3 .Cue testified that possessing a slapjack was a parole violation for Randle (Hr'g Tr. 34), but the parole conditions do not prohibit Randle from possessing weapons other than ammunition, bullet casings, cartridges, gunpowder, and explosive devices (Gov.'s Ex. 2). 4 . The government also cites the slapjack Cue found, but making this discovery a bas ne, 451 F.3d 643, 669 (10th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Regardless, I allowed the testimony because
holding that lay witness opinion as to guilt of defendant inadmissible holding grandparent visitation statute serves compelling state interest in maintaining grandparentgrandchild relationship where grandparents had raised child for period of time but agreeing with trial court that something more than childs best interest must be established to serve compelling state interest holding that a lay witness could not opine about whether something constituted a compelling state interest because it required legal expertise holding that a forensic accountant is an expert witness not a lay witness recognizing the compelling interest in highway safety