in this Court. Or they may move the United States District Court to withdraw the reference pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(d) and try some or all of their claims in the District Court. See Patterson, 150 B.R. at 368 (district court withdrew the reference of personal injury tort claim but declined to withdraw reference of dischargeability claim); Erickson, 330 B.R. at 350 (“With regard to the debtor’s stated preference for transferring the state-court litigation to the district court which may try both the issue of the discrimination claim and the issue of its dischargeability together, nothing in this ruling precludes the debtor from moving in the district court to transfer the litigation and to revoke the reference to the bankruptcy court of the nondis-chargeability issue pur .2005) (<HOLDING>); In re Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc., 281 B.R.
holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort holding that employment discrimination on the basis of race creed disability or sex is a personal injury tort holding that allegations of discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation necessarily state a claim of discrimination on the basis of sex holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort