by the guardrail. When Trooper O’Connor sensed that Leach was not cooperating with him, he yelled, ‘You will answer any questions.” Leach’s request for an attorney was followed by Trooper O’Connor stating that he had a bad attitude. The motion judge addressed all of the evidence that the State argued supported a finding of reasonable and articulable suspicion: defendants’ nervous behavior, their conflicting statements, and the fallen-off gas tank. In the motion judge’s view, there were “many reasons” that could explain the “nervousness” of some of the defendants and the “conflicting statements” at 3 a.m. on the shoulder of the Turnpike. Indeed, it is a sad fact that not all persons feel comfortable in the presence of the police. State v. Tucker, 136 N.J. 158, 169, 642 A.2d 401 (1994) (<HOLDING>); State v. Kuhn, 213 N.J.Super. 275, 282, 517
holding that dismissal of some but not all claims or parties not immediately appealable absent rule 54b certification holding that some federal connection to the misconduct is required holding that dismissal of some but not all of the defendants who had been served with complaint is not a final order recognizing that some city residents may not feel entirely comfortable in the presence of some if not all police is regrettable but true holding that proof of some or even all of the badges may not show intent