defendant be advised of the nature of the charge as well as the mandatory minimum penalty, if any, provided by law and the maximum possible penalty. Garcia, 121 N.M. at 548, 915 P.2d at 304 (relying on Rule 5-303(E) NMRA). Another formulation requires that a defendant be advised of the permissible range of sentences. Id. at 549, 915 P.2d at 305. While the maximum possible penalty and any mandatory minimum are generally set forth in the statutes proscribing the offenses, Supreme Court approved forms contain various formulations for non-mandatory minimum penalties, ranging from “a suspended sentence,” Form 9-406 NMRA (paragraph 2), to no statement of a minimum penalty, Form 9-406A NMRA (paragraph 2); Form 9-408A NMRA, to “probation,” Form 9-408 NMRA (paragraph 2 und .E.2d 559, 564 (1974) (<HOLDING>), overruled on other grounds by People v.
holding that a defendants prior juvenile dispositions are valid as prior criminal convictions because floridas juvenile procedures are constitutionally sound holding that substantial compliance with rule on admonishments to defendants entering pleas does not include being informed by the court concerning the possible dispositions by way of periodic imprisonment probation conditional discharges in cases of juvenile offenders and fines holding that excessive fines clause does not apply to civiljury award of punitive fines holding that although the juvenile restitution statute does not expressly require the juvenile court to determine whether the juvenile has the ability to pay the restitution ordered as a condition of probation the policies underlying the adult restitutions command that a trial court make such an inquiry applies with equal force to juvenile courts holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient