J., concurring), rev’d on other grounds, 305 S.C. 406, 409 S.E.2d 368 (1991). We hold that Lennon does not have standing to challenge the decision of the South Carolina Coastal Council; therefore, we dismiss the appeal. DISMISSED. HEARN and STILWELL, JJ., concur. 1 . Zanetti was listed as a plaintiff in the appeal to the circuit court. The circuit court, however, determined Zanetti was not a proper party because she was not granted intervenor status during the administrative hearing. See 23A S.C.Code Ann.Regs. 30-6(0) (Supp.1997) (requiring one who wishes to intervene to file a motion with the council for leave to intervene). Neither Lennon nor Zanetti appealed this finding. Any attempt now to do so comes too late. See Bochette v. Bochette, 300 S.C. 109, 386 S.E.2d 475 (Ct.App.1989)
holding that issues not argued in initial brief are deemed waived holding that an issue first argued in a reply brief is not properly before a court of appeals holding that an appellant forfeits all issues not raised and argued in initial brief on appeal holding an appellant may not use the reply brief to argue issues not argued in the initial brief holding an argument made in plaintiffs reply brief but not in their opening brief waived