will impose an undue hardship....” 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8). The term “debt” here is unitary, and not susceptible to “partial” debt readings. When Congress wanted to permit partial discharge, it made that obvious through such language as “to the extent,” which Congress used elsewhere to modify the term debt. See 11 U.S.C. §§ 523(a)(2), 523(a)(5), and 523(a)(7). Here, the term “debt” is used in the general, § 101(5) sense: as a liability based on a claim, rather than some portion thereof. Because the plain language of § 523(a)(8) governs the dischargeability of student loan indebtedness and does not permit partial discharge, the plain language of § 105 makes clear that the court’s equitable powers cannot include the ability to partially discharge student loan debt. See 11 U.S.C. § 105 (<HOLDING>). Where, as here, the' equitable remedy stands
holding grant of authority to an agency to adopt rules necessary to carry out this chapter clearly vested in the agency authority to interpret a statute recognizing constructive trust as appropriate equitable remedy holding that 1 usc  1 does not apply except where it is necessary to carry out the evident intent of the statute recognizing equitable powers necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of this title holding that section 105 grants statutory contempt powers in the bankruptcy context that may be used to award monetary and other forms of relief for automatic stay violations to the extent such awards are necessary and appropriate to carry out the provisions of the bankruptcy code