offense giving rise to the arrest, overruling a number of cases we have decided under Wolfish. In Wolfish, the Supreme Court held that strip searches in a prison setting could be performed based on “less than probable cause.” 441 U.S. at 560, 99 S.Ct. 1861. We have repeatedly concluded that, under Wolfish, a strip search of an individual arrested for a minor offense must be premised on reasonable suspicion that the detainee is carrying weapons or contraband. See, e.g., Kelly v. Foti, 77 F.3d 819, 821 (5th Cir.1996) (“Jail officials may strip search a person arrested for a minor offense and detained pending the posting of bond only if they possess a reasonable suspicion that he is hiding weapons or contraband.”); Watt v. City of Richardson Police Dep’t, 849 F.2d 195, 198 (5th Cir. 1988) (<HOLDING>); Stewart v. Lubbock County, Tex., 767 F.2d
holding that a dog sniff of a federal express package was a search holding statute permitting increased sentence based on prior conviction is penalty provision not element of offense holding that the defendants prior drug conviction for simple possession did not constitute a controlled substance offense because the plain language of  4b12b requires that the prior conviction involve possession with intent to distribute holding that a conviction under the registration clause is not properly distinguishable from a conviction for failure to register for purposes of fifth amendment analysis holding that visual strip search of arrestee for failure to register a dog based solely on the arrestees prior drug offense conviction was unconstitutional