are any number of reasons that could create a dangerous condition in regard to a manhole cover. For instance, was the cover simply not placed properly over the opening? Was it instead the wrong type of cover, perhaps too small, for the opening? Was there some sort of device, such as a bolt, that was not properly fastened to secure the cover? Was the cover damaged? Roulston testified in his deposition that the cover was "loose”. Depo. of Joey ther the proofs justify with reason the conclusion that employer negligence played any part, even the slightest, in producing the injury ... for which damages are sought.” Rogers v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 506, 77 S.Ct. 443, 1 L.Ed.2d 493 (1957). 9 . See, e.g., Martin v. Walk, Haydel & Associates, Inc., 742 F.2d 246 (5th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). 10 . The plaintiff’s primary contention in
holding that an employer cannot be held liable under the ada if it had no knowledge of the employees alleged disability holding that hearsay in affidavit which would be inadmissible in evidence at trial could not be considered on motion for summary judgment holding that passengers claims could not be based on unseaworthiness recognizing action for wrongful death based on unseaworthiness holding that if a defendant held a demise charter on a vessel under which the party would assume near complete dominion and control over the ship it could be considered as an owner for an unseaworthiness claim