(Vernon 1989). Most of Article 27.14 deals with misdemeanors for which the maximum possible punishment is a fíne. The statute itself does not specifically require an admonishment, nor does it provide that no admonishment be given. Some earlier cases citing the statute have concluded that an admonishment is not required for misdemeanors. But Perkins does not seek relief under this statute, but rather under the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Due process requires that a defendant’s guilty plea not only be voluntary but “be knowing, intelligent acts done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and likely consequences.” Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) (emphasis ad 92 S.Ct. 410, 30 L.Ed.2d 372 (1971) (<HOLDING>). In McMillan v. State, the Court of Appeals
holding that there is no substantive due process right under the fourteenth amendment to be free from malicious prosecution holding that due process requires a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case holding that there is no due process right to appellate review holding that as a matter of due process an indigent defendant in a criminal proceeding is entitled to psychiatric assistance when his mental capacity is at issue holding that its right of due process requires that an indigent be furnished a record of the trial to satisfy whether it is a felony or nonfelony prosecution