a party must be an “aggrieved person.” Title 1, section 42 of the Virgin Islands Code states that, “words and phrases shall be read with their context and shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the English language.” Under its normal and customary meaning, an “aggrieved” person is defined as “a person with a legally recognized interest that is injuriously affected by an act of a judicial or q r. 1996)). We note that it is unclear whether Dr. Williams was aggrieved by V.I.B.M.E.’s January 26, 2006 Order beginning on February 17, 2006, the date V.I.B.M.E. issued its order, or from March 7, 2006 when he was notified of Vi.B.M.E.’s decision to permanently revoke his license. Compare Worldwide Flight Services v. Gov’t of the V.I., 51 V.I. 105, 109 (V.I. 2009) (<HOLDING>) with Tip Top Constr. Inc. v. Gov’t of the V.I.
holding that party is aggrieved from the date of issuance but construing a statute rather than rule 15a holding that in construing statute courts must first look to its plain language holding the correct date to use when determining the controlling statute is date upon which the claim arose holding that the phrase party aggrieved should be given a practical rather than hypertechnical meaning holding that the 90 day period set out in rule 591 begins to run from the date of filing rather than the date set for hearing of the posttrial motion