The statute further requires that the diagnosis of psychological injury “must be made by a psychologist, or psychiatrist duly licensed to practice in the jurisdiction in which treatment is rendered____” I.C. § 72-451(5). Idaho Code § 72-714 governs hearings in the Industrial Commission. Sub-seetion (3) provides that “[t]he commission, or member thereof, or a hearing officer, referee or examiner, to whom the matter has been assigned, shall make such inquiries and investigations as may be deemed necessary.” I.C. § 72-714(3). This Court has interpreted this statute as permitting the Commission to demand additional evidence if it finds that satisfactory evidence on a question of material fact is lacking. See, e.g., Hartman v. Double L Mfg., 141 Idaho 456, 458, 111 P.3d 141, 143 (2005) (<HOLDING>); Lay v. Idaho State Seh. & Colony, 64 Idaho
holding that the authority to determine the appropriate penalty is with the supervisor of liquor control and not the administrative hearing commission or the reviewing court holding that suppression of evidence by the prosecution of evidence favorable to the defendant upon request violates the defendants right to due process where the evidence is material holding that plaintiff must present such evidence holding that even when there is a conflict of evidence before the commission and the evidence was such that the commission could have reasonably reached a contrary decision the commissions decision was not arbitrary and capricious holding that statute grants the commission the authority to request that the parties present adequate evidence  