proof of self-defense as applied to the facts of her case.” Flenoy claims this was prejudicial to her because “but for her mistaken understanding of the law of self-defense as applied to her case, she would not have chosen to plead guilty.” Before addressing the merits of Flenoy’s single issue on appeal, we must determine whether we have the power to do so. Rule 24.035 requires a movant to “include every claim known to the movant for vacating, setting aside, or correcting the judgment or sentence,” and requires the movant to acknowledge “the movant’s understanding that the movant waives any claim for relief known to the movant that is not listed in the motion.” Rule 24.035(d) (emphasis added). Rule 24.035 also sets forth express timeframes within which claims for relief must be fil 6) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, a claim for relief not raised in a
holding that a ground for relief not pled in a motion for postconviction relief is waived and cannot be raised on appeal holding that claims raised in a postconviction motion cannot be relitigated in a habeas petition holding that arguments not raised in district court are waived holding that claims not raised in a timely postconviction motion are waived holding that arguments not raised in opposition to a motion for summary judgment are waived