church purchased gas, insurance, and supplies from out of state and several church attendees came from out of state); United States v. Rea, 300 F.3d 952, 962 (8th Cir.2002) (concluding that § 844(i) did not cover a church annex that only housed Sunday school classes and after-school tutoring because the purchase of supplies for the annex by itself had only "fleeting effects on interstate commerce”); United States v. Odom, 252 F.3d 1289, 1296-97 (11th Cir.2001) (dismissing church’s receipt of donations from out-of-state donors, utilization of Bibles purchased from out-of-state vendors, and contributions to various out-of-state nonprofit organizations as “too passive, too minimal and too indirect” to affect interstate commerce); United States v. Johnson, 246 F.3d 749, 752 (5th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). 13 . The town of Henning is the site of the
holding that apprendi v new jersey 530 us 466 120 sct 2348 147 led2d 435 2000 does not apply to a judges exercise of discretion within a statutory range so long as a defendants sentence is not set beyond the maximum term specified in the substantive statute holding that apprendi v new jersey 530 us 466 120 sct 2348 147 led2d 435 2000 did not overrule almendareztorres v united states 523 us 224 118 sct 1219 140 led2d 350 1998 holding that apprendi v new jersey 530 us 466 120 sct 2348 147 led2d 435 2000 was not violated where the sentence did not exceed the applicable statutory maximum holding that almendareztorres remains binding despite apprendi v new jersey 530 us 466 120 sct 2348 147 led2d 435 2000 holding that earlier decision united states v johnson 194 f3d 657 662 5th cir1999 which was vacated and remanded by the supreme court 530 us 1201 120 sct 2193 147 led2d 230 2000 correctly concluded that contribution of funds by church members to a national organization and payment of an insurance claim by an outofstate insurer did not suffice to show that the jurisdictional element of  844i had been met