Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9, 103 S.Ct. 2841, 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). 27 . See Beneficial Nat’l Bank v. Anderson, 539 U.S. 1, 6, 123 S.Ct. 2058, 156 L.Ed.2d 1 (2003). Two exceptions to the well-pleaded complaint rule permit removal of state law actions: when the claims are completed preempted by federal law and when Congress “expressly so provides" for removal of those claims. Id. at 8, 123 S.Ct. 2058. Neither of these exceptions is relevant here. 28 . Id. 29 . Marcus v. AT & T Corp., 138 F.3d 46, 53 (2d Cir.1998) (quoting Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 393, 107 S.Ct. 2425, 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987)). Accord City of Rome v. Verizon Communications, Inc., 362 F.3d 168, 174 (2d Cir.2004). 30 . Whitaker v. American Telecasting, Inc., 261 F.3d 196, 206 (2d Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>) (quotation marks omitted). 31 . Id. 32 .
holding that pleading which provided incomplete address information did not allow the defendant to intelligently ascertain removability the defendant was not required to research the missing address of another named defendant to discover removability holding that this court must remand to the bia to allow it to address in the first instance an issue that it has not yet considered holding that to preserve an issue a party must object with sufficient specificity to allow the trial court to address it holding that the defendant knowingly and intelligently waived his right to counsel even though the exchange between the magistrate and the defendant was inadequate standing alone to inform the defendant of the dangers and disadvantages of selfrepresentation holding the trial court erred when it instructed the jury that it may find the defendant guilty of conspiracy if the jury found the defendant agreed with at least one other person where the indictment charged the defendant with conspiring with a single named individual and the evidence tended to show the defendant may have conspired with a number of persons not just the named coconspirator to commit an unlawful act