RFDI’s behalf) and Schmidt (subcontractor to Stokes for installation of the racking system). Interlake also introduced no expert testimony of its own; it did not introduce the testimony of the previously precluded experts, Kath leen Murphy R.N., or Gary Barach. Instead, Interlake elected to rely on: its cross-examination of Rice and a reading from the transcript of Rice’s deposition taken before the first trial. N.T., 02/23/10 at 7-25. In addition, Interlake read to the jury selections from: the transcript of the prior trial testimony of Dr. Jeffrey Ketchman, plaintiff’s design expert {id. at 27-125); the deposition of Brian Tumulty, formerly RFDI’s chief financial officer {id. at 128-131); the prior trial testimony of Charles Daniel Willis, a former em 598, 493 A.2d 669, 672-74 (1985) (<HOLDING>); Berkeihiser v. DeBartolomeo, 413 Pa. 158,
holding that superior court erred in granting judgment nov and remanding for a new trial generally holding that superior courts erred in granting judgment nov on a wrongful death claim and remanding for new trial on that claim and on damages holding that superior court erred in reversing trial courts order granting new trial and remanding for a new trial limited to apportionment of damages holding that the superior courts erred to the extent that it allowed a new trial on a lung cancer claim and affirming the grant of a new trial limited to noncancer injury claims holding that trial court erred by granting a directed verdict on statute of limitations defense and remanding for a new trial on the statute of limitations only