from the Pomp Room, across the street, deposited him in the bushes, and threatened to break every bone in Sutter’s body. We cannot say that Fields’ self-defense claim was “patently frivolous.” See Bass, 909 F.2d at 305. Finally, although the government’s evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we cannot say that it was overwhelming on the only disputed issue: whether Fields acted in self-defense. Many of the government’s witnesses acknowledged that they had focused on the altercation between Ertz and Padovani. No witness saw Fields stab Fodness; and there was conflicting testimony on whether or how many times Fodness struck Fields. In short, we cannot say that the government’s evidence was overwhelming. Cf. United States v. Turner, 966 F.2d 440, 442-43 (8th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). Thus, all four Bass factors support the
holding that prosecutorial misconduct was harmless in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt holding doyle violations harmless where evidence of guilt overwhelming holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt holding improperly admitted evidence was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt