for municipal securities business by the issuer,” MSRB Rule Book Rule G-37(g)(vi), at 272 (July 1, 2016) (emphasis added); see also MSRB Rule Book Rule G-37(g)(xvi), at 271-72 (Apr. 1, 2017). Compare MSRB Rule Book Rule G-37(b)(i), at 269 (July 1, 2016), ivith MSRB Rule G-37(b)(i)(A), at 266 (Apr. 1, 2017). Therefore, Leather-wood’s affidavit sheds no light upon whether the 2016 Amendments in particular affect McManus. We are thus left with a record that does not identify a single individual whom the 2016 Amendments have prevented from donating to Petitioners or contributing to the Petitioners’ candidates. Without any further basis upon which we could assume that such an individual exists, we decline to hold that Petitioners’ injuries egan, 676 F.2d 715, 723 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (en banc) (<HOLDING>), rev’d on other grounds, 461 U.S. 540, 103
recognizing the standing of an organization whose fundraising efforts would be impaired by an irs taxdeductiblecontribution rule because the organization would be harmed if its contributors ceased giving it money holding that an organization whose members are injured may represent those members even where the organization itself cannot show injury holding that a nonprofit organization lacked standing under unruh because its civil rights had not been personally violated and it failed to show that any of its members would suffer injury holding an organization had standing because some of its individual members did holding that an organization whose members were potential targets of future prosecutions had standing to seek injunctive relief