a loaded firearm and a bottle of whiskey. According to the government, defendant admitted that the gun was his, that he had it for protection, and that he had intended to tell Geffre about it but was afraid he would get in trouble. The government states that, in a separate interview, defendant’s mother acknowledged that defendant had asked for the pistol, saying that he was going to clean it. The federal grand jury subsequently indicted defendant on one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). Defendant now .1990) (reversing conviction where deputy sheriff executed state search warrant on property rented by enrolled Indian and located within exterior boundaries of tribal lands); and State v. Spotted Horse, 462 N.W.2d 463 (S.D.1990) (<HOLDING>). The government argues that Baker and Ross are
holding that oklahoma police officer was without jurisdiction to arrest indian inside indian reservation when the state has neither received by express grant nor acted pursuant to congressional authorization to assume criminal jurisdiction over indian country recognizing the inherent power of indian tribes  to exercise criminal jurisdiction over all indians holding that indian tribes could only exercise criminal jurisdiction over tribal members and not other indians holding that pursuant to amended public law 280 a tribe must consent to state court civil jurisdiction over actions arising against member indians in indian country holding that state of south dakota does not have criminal jurisdiction over indians in indian country