The question posed by appellant’s counsel sought to determine bias or prejudice against the appellant b ns seeking to determine bias or prejudice are proper, it goes on to find that the appellant’s question sought to commit the jurors to a specific set of facts. I disagree. The only facts specific to the case that were part of the question were the facts that the appellant was mentally ill, he had no prior convictions, and he was eligible for probation. The facts injected in the question the appellant sought to ask are distinguishable from the facts of the improper questions in the cases upon which the majority relies. In those cases, the facts were a description of the offense with which the defendant was charged. See, e.g., Penry v. State, 903 S.W.2d 715, 739-40 (Tex.Crim.App.1995) (<HOLDING>); Allridge v. State, 762 S.W.2d 146, 163-64
holding whether a juror could assess life imprisonment in a specific fact scenario constituting capital murder was an improper commitment to facts holding that where both firstdegree and felony murder were possible bases for a murder conviction a jury instruction that suggested the jury could rely on felony murder as the predicate offense for a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was improper because under arizona law a conviction for conspiracy to commit firstdegree murder requires a specific intent to kill holding double jeopardy did not prohibit capital prosecution of defendant who pled guilty to seconddegree murder and agreed to testify against codefendants but violated plea agreement by refusing to testify at retrial and state properly sought new indictment for capital murder resulting in death sentence imposed at trial for firstdegree murder holding that sentence was erroneous but not void where sentence of life imprisonment without parole was imposed for first degree murder under unconstitutional penalty statute holding that whether amendment to capital felonymurder information to add the charge of premeditated and deliberate murder was improper turned on whether there was prejudice or surprise