Cpl Cervantes pinned the envelope on the duty hut’s bulletin board. Record at 99-100. Cpl Cervantes was later relieved of the duty by the appellant. The following day, Cpl Cervantes was approached by LCpl Woods, who inquired concerning the whereabouts of the envelope his wife had dropped off for him. Cpl Cervantes went to the duty hut bulletin board and saw that the envelope he had pinned there was now gone. He searched the trash can in the duty hut to see if it had inadvertently fallen from the wall. He then tendered $10.00 of his personal funds to LCpl Woods, and went to see the appellant in his barracks room in order to determine if he had perhaps taken the envelope to give to LCpl Woods. Cpl Cervantes testified that, at this time, he did not suspect the appellant of h .1986)(<HOLDING>). This assignment of error is without merit.
holding that mere insertion of key was not a search or at least not an unreasonable search protected by the fourth amendment holding that when acting pursuant to a valid warrant the police did not violate the fourth amendment by acting outside their jurisdiction in violation of state law holding that the fourth amendment exclusionary rule should not bar the use of evidence obtained by police officers acting in good faith and with reasonable reliance on a facially valid search warrant holding that search by military policeman acting in nonlaw enforcement role is not covered by the fourth amendment holding that the fourth amendment and the exclusionary rules are not implicated by a private search