7. RM Kids further contends that the trial court erred in granting Old Republic’s motion for directed verdict as to RM Kids’s claim for prejudgment interest under OCGA § 7-4-15, arguing that whether or not damages were liquidated was an issue for the jury. Again, we disagree. OCGA § 7-4-15 provides, in relevant part: “All liquidated demands, where by agreement or otherwise the sum to be paid is fixed or certain, bear interest from the time the party shall become liable and bound to pay them; if payable on demand, they shall bear interest from the time of the demand.” Under this Code section, “prejudgment interest — which flows automatically from a liquidated demand — is to be awarded upon a judgment for a liquidated amount.” But importantly, a demand is liquid (184 SE 858) (1936) (<HOLDING>). Cf. DTI Logistics, Inc., 300 Ga. App. at
holding despite a reservation of rights that when the insurer provides a defense to its insured the insured has no right to interfere with the insurers control of the defense and a stipulated judgment between the insured and the injured claimant without the consent of the insurer is ineffective to impose liability upon the insurer holding that insureds demand to insurer was liquidated when insurer did not point to any evidence at trial in support of its contention that damages were disputed holding that in a dispute between insurer and insured in which the insurer admitted liability hut disputed the amount of damages it was only after entry of a judgment upon that verdict that the claim became liquidated holding that if the insured is only partially compensated by the insurer both the insurer and the insured are real partiesininterest holding that court of appeals was without jurisdiction to modify judgment against insurer because judgment against insurer became final when it failed to appeal