B to the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, p. 6, ¶ 31. 38 . First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand attached as Exhibit B to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, p. 6, ¶ 32. 39 . First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand attached as Exhibit B to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, p. 6, ¶ 33. 40 . First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand attached as Exhibit B to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, p. 6, ¶ 34. 41 . First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand attached as Exhibit B to the Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, p. 7, ¶¶ 40-42. 42 . Klemens v. Wallace (In re Wallace), 840 F.2d 762, 765 (10th Cir.1988). 43 . 4 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶523.10[2], at 523-76-523-77 (Alan N. Resnick & Henry J. Sommer, eds., 16th ed. rev. 2009). 44 . Colo.Rev.Stat. § 987) (<HOLDING>). 59 . Meyer v. Rigdon, 36 F.3d 1375, 1379 (7th
holding that a district court judgment is not a final judgment appealable by the defendant unless it includes the final adjudication and the final sentence holding that implied consent is inferred from circumstances indicating that party knowingly agreed to surveillance holding intent to preclude can be found by language contained with the stipulated judgment indicating the debt is nondischargeable in bankruptcy holding the court cannot find intent where the consent judgment fails to mention the cause of action holding the intent of parties can be inferred from sufficient details contained within the consent judgment indicating the parties understood the consent judgment operated as a final adjudication of the factual issues