time he was recruited. Id. 4 . Stencil had become an Amtrak employee in 1986, Salemme joined Amtrak in 1987, and Mauck had been employed by Amtrak since 1973. Compl. ¶¶ 24-26. 5 . Although Rule 12(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) be considered as a motion for summary judgment if "matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court,” the Court's consideration of the exhibits attached to the plaintiff's memorandum in opposition to the defendants' motion does not require such a conversion since the plaintiff has extensively referenced and extracted quotes from the exhibits, not only in his opposition papers but also in its complaint in support of his claims. Vanover v. Hantman, 77 F.Supp.2d 91, 98 (D.D.C.1999) (<HOLDING>); see Langer v. George Washington Univ., 498
holding that the materials attached to the motion for summary judgment must be admissible and usable at trial holding in wrongful termination suit that various letters and materials produced in the course of plaintiffs discharge proceeding all of which have been attached to plaintiffs opposition papers fall under this exception and may be considered without converting the motion to one for summary judgment holding that plan documents could be considered without converting the motion to one for summary judgment even though the complaint referred only to the plan and not its associated documents holding that although a district court may not consider matters extraneous to the pleadings a document integral to or explicitly relied upon in the complaint may be considered without converting the motion to dismiss in one for summary judgment holding that where a complaint makes express reference to attachments that are central to the plaintiffs claims those documents may be considered on a motion to dismiss without converting it into a motion for summary judgment