plan in a workmen’s compensation award. Flowers v. Flowers, 118 Ariz. 577, 580, 578 P.2d 1006, 1009 (App.1978) (special concurring opinion). Consequently, the workmen’s compensation award received after dissolution of marriage for injuries received during marriage is the separate property of the worker. California and Texas treat workmen’s compensation benefits received during the marriage as community property and as separate property after the dissolution of the marriage. In re Marriage of McDonald, 52 Cal.App.3d 509, 125 Cal.Rptr. 160 (1975); Hicks v. Hicks, 546 S.W.2d 71 (Tex.Civ.App. 1976). We are aware that there are a number of recent court of appeals decisions regarding the nature of disability benefits received during marriage and after dissolution of marriage. P.2d 909 (1980) (<HOLDING>); Luna v. Luna, 125 Ariz. 120, 608 P.2d 57
holding social security disability payments and military disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage holding veterans administration disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage holding military service disability payments are community property holding that money invested in voluntary investment plan during marriage was marital property because it was property acquired during marriage holding that post dissolution costofliving increases are marital property as they stemmed from employment during the marriage