1190, 155 L.Ed.2d 108 (2003) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, it was not an unreasonable
holding cruel and unusual punishment complaint not preserved holding that petitioners 25yearstolife sentence under the california three strikes law did not violate the eighth amendments prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment holding that the eighth amendments prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment is implicated when handcuffs or restraints are used to subject a prisoner to great pain either deliberately as punishment or mindlessly with indifference to the prisoners humanity holding that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment incorporates the eighth amendments guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment holding that what constitutes cruel and unusual punishment is a question of law