with insufficient notice. This is because die properly-noticed shareholder or director might be deprived of the views and arguments of the insufficientiy noticed or absent shareholder or director. 14 . Appellants have made, no claim that, on December 13, 2012, the LEI shareholders were not fully informed of the resolution they were voting to ratify. 15 . Within Appellants’ Rule 2116 "statement of questions involved,” Appellants did not raise any claim that the trial court erred when it held that the December 13, 2012 ratification was retroactively effective, making it so that Scott Linde’s removal as a director was effective December 3, 2012. As such, Appellants waived any such claim on appeal. Southcentral Employment Corp. v. Birmingham Fire Ins. Co., 926 A.2d 977, 983 n. 5 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, we note that Appellants did not
holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal holding that issues not raised in a partys opening brief are waived holding issues not raised in appellate brief are waived holding issues not raised before local agency are waived holding that issues   not explicitly raised in the statement of questions involved are  waived