grievance appeal form, “courts have ‘ample’ discretion’ to forego exhaustion of a (state grievance procedure) if you miss grievance deadlines.” Plaintiff’s appeal was denied; he filed a complaint in federal district court under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the district court concluded that Plaintiff failed to show good cause necessary to excuse his untimely filing. We agree. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) requires that a prisoner exhaust all available administrative remedies before a suit challenging prison conditions may be brought. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). As the Supreme Court has observed, an invigorated exhaustion requirement is a centerpiece of the PLRA’s effort to reign in the quantity of prisoner suits. Woodford v. Ngo, — U.S. -, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 2382, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (<HOLDING>). Exhaustion is left to the discretion of
holding that  1997ea requires proper exhaustion holding that exhaustion under  1997ea must occur prior to commencement of the action holding that proper exhaustion of administrative remedies is necessary under section 1997ea holding that proper exhaustion under  1997ea is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules holding that proper exhaustion under 42 usc  1997ea is mandatory and requires adherence to administrative procedural rules