abusive estranged husband. Moore said that, when he was stopped, he removed the gun from the glove compartment and put it on the dashboard of the car because he thought the firearm “would likely be discovered when he reached into the glove compartment to retrieve the vehicle registration, and believed that he would face greater legal difficulty if he were charged with carrying a concealed weapon, than if he admitted to being in possession of a firearm after being convicted of a felony.” (JA-II at 302-OS). Moore argued that the enhancement for possessing the firearm in connection with another felony did not apply because his possession of the gun while he was also in possession of drugs was merely fortuitous and accidental. See United States v. Blount, 337 F.3d 404, 411 (4th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). At the first sentencing hearing in June 2005,
holding that to apply the firearm enhancement the firearm need only reflect the context of the defendants possession and the defendants ability to use the firearm to promote the controlled substance offense recognizing that sentencing guidelines may provide enhancements for mere possession of firearm during other offense holding that an enhancement for an express threat of death may not be applied to the sentence for robbery when the threat is related to the use of the firearm and the defendant has a  924c sentence for the same firearm holding that  2k21b5 enhancement applies if firearm facilitates other offense its presence may not be mere accident or coincidence holding that the application of the enhancement for using a firearm in connection with another felony offense is proper only if there is a clear connection between the firearm that was used in the other offense and the one that was used in the offense of conviction