Barbour County, 885 So.2d 783, 788 (Ala.2004).’ ” Ex parte Murphy, 72 So.3d 1202, 1205-06 (Ala.2011) (quoting Alabama Dep’t of Transp. v. Harbert Int’l, Inc., 990 So.2d 831, 839 (Ala.2008)). “A complaint seeking money damages against a State employee in his or her official capacity is considered a complaint against the State, and such a complaint is barred by Art. I, § 14, Alabama Constitution of 1901.” Ex parte Butts, 775 So.2d at 177 (citing Ex parte Alabama Dep’t of Forensic Scis., 709 So.2d 455, 457 (Ala.1997)). Both Buckner, as Commissioner of DHR, and Mashégo, as Director of the Shelby County DHR, are entitled to immunity from claims for money damages asserted against them in their official capacities. See Ex parte Mobile Cnty. Dep’t of Human Res., 815 So.2d 527, 530 (Ala.2001) (<HOLDING>); Ex parte Trawick, 959 So.2d 51, 55 (Ala.2006)
holding county clerk sued in official capacity was entitled to the immunity the county enjoyed holding that employees of dhr and the mobile county dhr were entitled to immunity in their official capacities holding that states and state officials acting in their official capacities are not persons subject to liability under  1983 holding that state employees acting in their official capacities are insulated from liability for money damages holding that defendants were entitled to official immunity and not addressing the merits