regarding the officers going upstairs to retrieve the guns without a warrant. (See id., Ex. G at vol. 2, pp. 139^40.) Further, Florence Ostroski testified that, after the defendant officers had subdued and handcuffed plaintiff, they kicked her, kneed her in the back, punched her in the back of the head and twisted her neck. (See id., Ex. G at vol. 2, pp. 141^43.) Plaintiff also testified that the officers lunged at her first, and kicked her and twisted her neck after she had been handcuffed. (See id., Ex. G. at vol. 3, pp. 92-94.) If the accounts of plaintiff and Florence Ostroski are credited, the Court cannot hold that the conduct of the defendant officers constituted an objectively reasonable use of force as a matter of law. See, e.g., Pierre-Antoine, 2006 WL 1292076, at *4 (<HOLDING>); Graham v. Springer, No. 03-CV-6190 (CJS),
holding that an officers use of force against a plaintiff was objectively reasonable considering the force the plaintiff herself exercised in resisting police custody holding that repeatedly striking a subdued individual would constitute an objectively unreasonable use of force under the fourth amendment holding that whether an officers force was reasonable must be analyzed under the reasonableness standard of the fourth amendment holding that an officer cannot use further nondeadly force against a restrained and subdued suspect holding that excessive force claims are to be treated under the fourth amendment