Third Circuit, however, never cited or discussed section 488 or these Superior Court decisions in either Ubiles or Lewis. Significantly, section 488 contains virtually identical language to the former article 27, section 36D of the Maryland Code, and Maryland appellate courts have held that this statute permits a search of any individual suspected of possessing a concealed gun, without also requiring reasonable suspicion that the gun is not licensed. See Allen v. State, 85 Md. App. 657, 584 A.2d 1279, 1284-85 (Md. Ct. App. 1991) (permitting search under article 27, section 36D despite officer’s lack of knowledge, and failure to ask questions calculated to determine, whether defendant was licensed to carry a gun); see also Quince v. State, 319 Md. 430, 572 A.2d 1086, 1087-88 (Md. 1990) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, section 488 may provide authority
holding that the juvenile defendants who voluntarily left their homes in the middle of night to ride to the police department in patrol cars and who were told they were not under arrest were not in custody holding that an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun  without any corroborating evidence  did not provide reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing justifying the officers stop and frisk of that person holding stop and frisk of individual who police were told was carrying a firearm was permissible even though police were not told that gun was unlicensed and individual cooperated and made no unusual movements holding that previous firearm possessions were relevant to show defendants knowledge and intent to possess a firearm where police saw defendant holding and discarding a gun holding that an anonymous tip lacking indicia of reliability that an individual is carrying a gun is not enough to justify a terry stop