Schiller v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd, 449 F.3d 286, 293 n. 7 (2d Cir.2006) (quoting Polanco v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Admin., 158 F.3d 647, 652 (2d Cir.1998)); Harris v. FAA, 353 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C.Cir.2004); see also 28 U.S.C. § 2401(a) (“[E]very civil action commenced against the United States shall be barred unless the complaint is filed within six years after the right of action first accrues.”). Under the APA, the statute of limitations begins to run at the time the challenged agency action becomes final. See 5 U.S.C. § 704; Harris v. FAA 353 F.3d at 1010. In the case of claimed procedural error in the promulgation of a regulation, final agency action occurs upon issuance of the regulation. See, e.g., Preminger v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 517 F.3d 1299, 1307-08 (Fed.Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr. v. Shalala, 177 F.3d
holding that the date on which the plaintiff learned of the defendants denial of tenure not the date on which the plaintiff became unemployed was when the statute of limitations began to run holding that  2401a statute of limitations on procedural challenge began to run at the latest on the date the challenged regulation was amended holding that when the representations and warranties were made on the date of closing the statute of limitations began to run on that date even though the contract imposed cure and repurchase obligations on the defendant recognizing that the statute of limitations for a survival action began to run on the date of the decedents injury as though he was bringing his own lawsuit holding that the statute of limitations begins to run on the date the alleged malpractice is discovered