addition to the items we discuss below, Rollins also moved to compel Cone's written progressive discipline policy; the descriptions of the Transporter and Merchandiser positions; EEOC and Florida Commission on Human Relations charge forms served on Cone since 2010; files that Cone human resources employees possessed discussing complaints of harassment, retaliation, or discrimination since 2010; and documents created by Null regarding employee discipline. Although Rollins mentions these items in passing on appeal, she fails to provide any specific arguments about why the district court erred in refusing to compel their production. We therefore decline to review the district court’s rulings on these items. See Sapuppo v. Allstate Floridian Ins. Co., 739 F.3d 678, 680-81 (11th Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>). 2 . The FCRA also makes it unlawful for
holding issues not adequately briefed on appeal are abandoned holding that issues not briefed on appeal even by a pro se litigant are deemed abandoned holding that generally arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned or waived holding that issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal holding that arguments not briefed are abandoned