Texas for private passenger automobiles must use this form. See id. 2 . The trial court granted summary judgment before reaching the class certification issue. 3 . All of Carlton’s claims below are premised on the notion that Texas automobile insurance contracts require coverage of inherent diminished value. 4 .Carlton actually asserts only four issues; the first issue merely states that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and sets out the summary judgment law without stating how the trial court erred. 5 . Trinity filed another motion to strike portions of Carlton’s post-submission briefing. Although Trinity characterized this filing as its third motion to strike, there are only two such motions on file. We denied this second motion, resolv , 143 S.E.2d 903, 906 (1965) (<HOLDING>). 18 . See Milby Auto Co. v. Kendrick, 8 S.W.2d
holding that when the insurer elects to repair or replace the damaged  part with other of like kind and quality less depreciation the insurer is obligated to put the automobile in substantially the same condition it was prior to the collision so as to render it as valuable and serviceable as before with the insured being compensated for any deficiency in loss of actual value holding that if repairs to a firedamaged vehicle with parts of like kind and quality would not restore the vehicle to its former market value the proper measure of damages was the difference in market value before and after the loss holding that unless the collision resulted in a total loss the measure of recovery is the difference between the fair market value of the vehicle in the condition in which it was immediately prior to the collision and its value thereafter holding that to find the measure of damages as the difference in market value immediately before and after the collision would be arbitrarily reading out of the policy the right of defendant to make repairs or replace the damaged part with materials of like kind and quality holding that if repairs to a firedamaged vehicle with parts of like kind and quality would not restore the vehicle to its former market value the proper measure of damages was the difference in market value before and after the loss where the policy limited liability to the cost to repair or replace the property  with other of like kind and quality less depreciation