over the bankruptcy estate extends to the Aetna D & O Policy and its proceeds”); see also In re marchFIRST, Inc., 288 B.R. 526, 532 (N.D.Ill.2002) (enjoining shareholders from prosecuting class action against directors and officers on basis that it might diminish asset of estate: proceeds of D & O policy); In re Adelphia Communications Corp., 302 B.R. 439, 450-52 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2003) (using § 105 equitable power to enjoin D & O insurer from obtaining declaratory ruling that policy void due to D & O’s fraud as impairing debtor’s ability to reorganize). Other cases focus less on the effect on the estate and more on the terms of the policy to determine if the proceeds are indeed property of the bankrupt. See, e.g., In re Louisiana World Exposition, 832 F.2d 1391, 1394 (5th Cir.1987)(<HOLDING>); In re Daisy Systems Securities Litigation,
holding directors and officers liability policy was property of the estate because the estate was worth more with indemnification coverage than without the coverage holding that because proceeds of a letter of credit were not secured by estate collateral the proceeds were not property of the estate holding that the proceeds of a liability insurance policy were not property of the estate holding directors and officers liability policy was not property of the estate because it did not increase or decrease the worth of the bankruptcy estate holding that where the policy names only the directors or officers as insured the proceeds are not property of the estate