the victim’s testimony must be corroborated with billing records. Id. at 750 (where the only evidence of medical expenses is the testimony of the victim that he or she incurred expenses and would incur expenses in the future, and the victim does not submit copies of his or her bills, the evidence is insufficient proof to support an award of restitution; but if the victim submits copies of such bills, the testimony of the victim is sufficient); State v. Schuette, 782 So.2d 935, 937 at n. 3 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (noting that victim’s testimony regarding the amount of medical bills incurred without any documentation of the bills would be insufficient to support a restitution order), quashed on other grounds, 822 So.2d 1275 (Fla.2002); M.J.T. v. State, 927 So.2d 1077, 1078 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the only evidence of the
holding that statute provides medical bills are admissible as evidence of necessary fair and reasonable charges holding that plaintiff could not recover medical bills that were discharged in bankruptcy holding that court properly admitted bills physician testified were reasonable and reasonably necessarily incurred holding that state did not submit sufficient evidence to establish amount of restitution to victim for medical bills incurred when it did not introduce any medical bills holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary