at trial, so as to provide the trial court an opportunity to make a final ruling on the matter in the context in which the evidence is introduced, results in waiver of the error on appeal. Brown, 783 N.E.2d at 1125. Consequently, Leo also waived this argument. Waiver notwithstanding, Indiana courts have not addressed the admissibility of a guardian ad litem's opinion. In actions for child custody or modification, the trial court is permitted by statute to order an investigation by a guardian ad litem, and the guardian ad litem's report: "(1) may be received in evidence at the hearing; and (2) may not be excluded on the grounds that the report is hearsay or otherwise incompetent." Ind.Code § 31-17 2-12 (1998). Further, the statute provides that the guardian ad litem may be cal 2) (<HOLDING>). We need not decide this issue today because,
holding that guardian ad litem and psychologist fees incurred in child custody proceedings and ordered to be paid directly to the guardian ad litem and psychologist were nondischargeable under  523a5 holding the district court properly allowed guardian ad litem fees to be taxed as costs holding that guardian ad litems extensive advice to plaintiffs attorney and daily involvement in case exceeded formal role of guardian ad litem holding that the trial court did not err by permitting the guardian ad litem to give his recommendation or by relying on the guardian ad litems recommendation as the recommendation was supported by evidence received at trial holding the trial court had jurisdiction where summons was served on the attorney advocate for the juveniles guardian ad litem