states that “[t]his Agreement, the Prime Contract (when available and only to the extent applicable), the Statements of Work, Change Orders (if any), and the documents incorporated by reference in this writing constitute the entire agreement and understanding between the parties and supersede all prior agreements, whether oral of written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.” Pl.’s Opp’n, Ex. 1 ¶21 (emphasis added). Therefore, as the prime contract was incorporated into the subcontract only to the extent that it was applicable, and as the subcontract contains its own forum selection clause, the forum selection clause in the prime contract cannot be applicable to the subcontract. Johnson v. Basic Constr. Co., 429 F.2d 764, 772 (D.C.Cir.1970) (<HOLDING>). The plaintiffs reliance on Manganaro Corp. v.
holding that damaged in a fraudulent misrepresentation action are limited to those that are pecuniary holding that provisions in a subcontract incorporating a prime contract for a limited purpose are limited only to those that are applicable recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1 recognizing district courts power to admit evidence for a limited purpose holding that such provisions are valid