therefore, more friendly toward defendants. Defendant offers no support for his position other than conclusory statements, and we can locate no case law to support the notion that those who drive, but do not vote, are considered a “distinct group.” Our sister circuits have adopted a three-part test for determining whether a group is “distinctive.” Factors considered include whether: 1) the group is defined by a limiting quality (i.e. the group has a definite composition such as race or sex); 2) a common thread or basic similarity in attitude, idea, or experience runs through the group; and 3) a community of interests exists among members of the group such that the group’s interest Blacks, and Hispanics as distinct groups); United States v. Yazzie, 660 F.2d 422, 426 (10th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). Like college students and certain age groups,
recognizing native americans as a distinct group recognizing as a distinct social group gay men with female sexual identities in mexico holding that unjustified segregation constitutes discrimination prohibited by the americans with disabilities act recognizing women as a distinct group holding that residents of a geograph ic area are not a distinct cognizable group and citing united states v test which made clear that a geographic area is not a distinct group for support