is akin to a home invasion or constitutes a search. Bank records expose much more about a person’s private life and activities within the home than utility records. Bank records may reveal all types of household items purchased and possessed by a person, such as furniture, artwork, and electronic equipment. Through check and debit card payments, those records may disclose what a person eats and drinks, what newspapers and magazines he reads, and even where he vacations. Bank records also may indicate the amount of a person’s utility and telephone bills. In compar Rptr.2d 89, 94 (1999) (finding that defendant did not have “a reasonable expectation of privacy in the quantity of electricity delivered by the utility to [his] house”); People v. Dunkin, 888 P.2d 305, 307 (Colo.Ct.App.1994) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, Smith v. Colorado, 515 U.S.
holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physicianpatient privilege in homicide trials holding that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in utility records under either state or federal constitution holding that no reasonable expectation of privacy in utility records exists under alaska constitution holding that prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their prison cells holding that a bank customer did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in records maintained by the bank