the FBI acted in bad faith because the destruction occurred after the murders “when it was obvious the map had evidentiary value.” The record, however, demonstrates only that the FBI acted negligently. Upon receiving the drawing from R.C., Agent Anderson put it “into a chain of custody” in the FBI’s Denver division. After the Pima County Sheriff’s Department assumed responsibility for the investigation, the FBI transferred the drawing and other evidence to its Phoenix division. The FBI later mistakenly closed the case and destroyed the evidence. Nothing indicates that the FBI sought to deprive Forde of the drawing, and the trial court therefore did not err by refusing to preclude all evidence of the Colorado meeting. Cf. State v. Vickers, 180 Ariz. 521, 528, 885 P.2d 1086, 1093 (1994) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 49 Forde also argues that the trial court
holding that doctrine does not violate due process holding that states inadvertent or negligent destruction of evidence did not violate defendants due process rights holding that negligent inaction by a jail officer does not violate due process holding that the ij did not violate petitioners due process rights by not discussing each piece of evidence holding courts have inherent power to compel discovery of the states evidence to protect a defendants due process rights