function, unless there are peculiar facts which give rise to other equities than loss or injury to the individual who has relied upon the act of the officer or agent. Deutsch, 126 Tex. at 536 (text differs from text in Southwestern Reporter), 91 S.W.2d at 310 (punctuation as in 126 Tex. 532, 536, 91 S.W.2d 308). Deutsch also stated that a city may be estopped even when it is acting in its public capacity if it has received or accepted benefit from the transaction. Deutsch, 91 S.W.2d at 311-12. D. The Current Controversy An independent school district is an agency of the state which carries out only governmental functions, and, consequently, is entitled to governmental immunity. Braun v. Trustees of Victoria Indep. School Dist., 114 S.W.2d 947, 949-50 (Tex. Civ.App.1938, writ ref’d) (<HOLDING>). AISD is not immune from suit, however, as the
holding that conflicting expert evidence regarding function establishes material issue of fact holding section 1010215 does not waive governmental immunity merely because a governmental action falls within the listed governmental functions thus further inquiry under the act is necessary holding that records in the possession of a party with whom an agency has contracted to perform a governmental function on behalf of the agency are presumptively public records subject to public access so long as the record a directly relates to the governmental function and b is not exempt under the rtkl recognizing that intent of public records act is to provide all citizens with access to the records of all public governmental bodies holding that tex constann art vii  1 1955 establishes the matter of public education as a governmental function for all purposes