on this motion for the “additional six months to two years” that it will take them to complete the land transfer. Section 8121, which was passed on September 30, 2003, expressly requires the Secretary of the Interior to undertake the land transfer. There is no doubt that the land transfer will go forward and, according to the government, it is already in progress. The court has examined Section 8121 and concludes that it provides sufficient information from which to determine whether the land transfer is a bona fide attempt to cure Defendants’ violation of the Establishment Clause by maintaining the Latin cross on Preserve land or an improper attempt to evade the permanent injunction. As a consequence, the court does not need to delay its decisi 395 F.3d 693, 702-04 (7th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Since “adherence to a formalistic standard
holding that the sale of 440 square feet of a city park containing a ten commandments monument to a private organization was valid because there were no unusual circumstances holding that plaintiffs have standing to challenge the constitutionality of monument inscribed with the ten commandments placed on government land by private organization even though government did not maintain the structure holding that a municipal corporation was forbidden to construct an auditorium in a park as such construction would practically destroy the lot as a park and convert its use into a public square holding that the sale of 015 acres of city park land containing a statute of jesus christ to a private organization validly extinguished any government endorsement of religion because there were not unusual circumstances holding that a civic center building or recreational building on property dedicated to the city as park property was inconsistent with its use as a park