for use, application, and disposal. See 52 Fed.Reg. 37,-518 (1987), J.A. 120. 9 . Twelve other firms hold FIFRA registrations to formulate TBT into end-use products, however, they may be exempt from the TBT monitoring requirements under FIFRA's "formulator exception.” 7 U.S.C. § 136a(c)(2)(D). See Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (hereafter EPA SJ) at 3 n. 2. 10 . M & T Chemicals was merged into plaintiff Atochem North America Inc. in December of 1989. 11 . EPA accepted plaintiffs’ proposed methodology for sampling and quality assurance, but refused to accept many of plaintiffs’ cost-saving modifications. J.A. 752-70. 12 . Additionally, plaintiffs contend that the magnitude and duration , 538 F.2d 349, 365 (D.C. Cir.1976) (<HOLDING>). 29 . 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A) (1988). 30 . See
holding that the burden is on the appellant to bring forth a record that demonstrates error holding that the postal service was not required to follow notice and comment rulemaking procedures holding that requiring notice and comment is not required where the record demonstrates that the agency in fact has had the benefit of petitioners comments holding that substantive changes made by administrative agencies in regulations are required to comply with certain notice and comment requirements which include publication of a notice of proposed rulemaking in the federal register an opportunity for interested persons to comment on that notice and after consideration of these comments publication of the final rule with a general statement of its basis and purpose citing 5 usc  553b c holding that where the appellant has failed to demonstrate error the court is not required to search the record for an error