1983); aff'd 764 F.2d 1285 (9th Cir. 1985), and adopted the District Court’s reasoning with respect to federal action immunity. For this reason, this Court relies upon the analysis and reasoning of both the Ninth Circuit and the District Court in Sakamoto. 5 . Sea Air correctly notes that antitrust immunity is not lightly imputed. United States v. Philadelphia National Bank, 374 U.S. 321, 350-51, 83 S.Ct. 1715, 1734-35, 10 L.Ed.2d 915 (1963). This principle, however, does nothing to change the governmental immunity doctrine created by the courts to protect the federal government from scrutiny intended for more purely commercial transactions. See Sea Land Service, Inc. v. The Alaska Railroad, 659 F.2d 243 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 919, 102 S.Ct. 1274, 71 L.Ed.2d 459 (1982) (<HOLDING>). 6 . The Third Circuit in Norman’s on the
holding state immune from suit involving a federal question holding that a railroad operated and owned by the federal government was immune from antitrust liability holding that an individual is immune from antitrust liability for exercising first amendment right to petition the government holding that a railroad owned and operated by the federal government was immune from antitrust action under the governmental immunity doctrine which protects the federal government its agencies and instrumentalities from the reaches of antitrust law holding that the government is immune from liability for its choice of traffic protection devices