received cash awards and please state the total amounts réceived by the informant from you in relation to the events at issue in this Complaint[ ]” may allow Plaintiff to piece together the person who made a purchase of black tar heroin from him, which could put the informant’s life and/or well-being in jeopardy. You cited to criminal defense cases as the basis for your argument that you are entitled to this information, however, this case does not involve an “individual’s right to prepare his defense.” This case involves a civil complaint filed against Defendant Ficke, inter alia. You have not set forth a basis for the need to disclose the identity or even the identifying information of the informant. See McGee v. Hayes, 43 Fed.Appx. 214, 217 (10’h [10th] Cir.2002) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>) Although you argue in your letter that
holding that the court is in no position to decide  whether there is a genuine dispute  because the district court did not permit  any discovery before issuing its ruling holding that a plaintiff is required to identify specific acts of individual defendants  for his claim to survive holding that a district court is not required to permit plaintiff to engage in a fishing expedition in the hope of supporting his claim holding that a plaintiff is not required to state the statutory or constitutional basis for his claim only the facts underlying it holding that failure to develop a legal argument supporting a claim results in waiver of the claim