“automatically satisfied] the more than slight or minimal effect standard.” Fanning, 827 F.2d at 633 n. 3 (citing Nieves, 775 F.2d at 14). After Fanning was decided, the Commissioner revised the regulations pertaining to the evaluation of mental disorders to clarify that for purposes of applying section 12.05C, we will assess the degree of functional limitation the additional impairment(s) imposes to determine if it significantly limits your physical or mental ability to do basic work activities, i.e., is a “severe” impairment(s), as defined in §§ 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c). If the additional impairment(s) does not cause limitations that are “severe” as defined in §§ 404.1520(c) and 416.920(c), we will not find that the additional impairments) imposes “an additional and significan 985) (<HOLDING>). For all of the foregoing reasons, the ALJ’s
holding that a claimant who watered a garden occasionally visited friends and was able to get on and off an examination table was disabled because he could not perform sedentary work holding that the alj erred in rejecting the iq of a claimant whose work history was limited primarily to working for his father holding that the record was not inconsistent with mental retardation meeting section 1205 where the claimant dropped out in tenth grade obtained a ged and could read write add and subtract but had problems with multiplication and division holding claimant suffered permanent total disability where functional disability was only twentyfive or thirty percent claimant was fiftynine years of age claimant had little or no education and the injury kept the claimant from performing physical work holding that the second prong of the c criteria in section 1205 was satisfied where the claimant was limited to light or sedentary work