thus, LRB had no responsi bility under the statute to give notice to Bank One-Indianapolis. The trial court erred in determining that the statute gave notice rights to Chase Bank as the merging entity that exceed those owed to Bank One-Merrillville, the original mortgagee and/or lender. Thus, the trial court erred in setting aside the tax deeds on the basis that LRB failed to comply with the notice provisions of the pertinent statutes. 2. Due Process LRB contends that the trial court erred in concluding that its notices did not comply with due process requirements. Initially, we must determine whether the due process clause applies to a non-governmental entity like LRB. See Tulsa Professional Collection Servs., Inc. v. Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 485, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988) (<HOLDING>). However, “when private parties make use of
holding that the fourteenth amendment protects property interests however only from a deprivation by state action holding that the eleventh amendment protects a state from suit by its own citizens holding that fourteenth amendment only applies to state action holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action