accordingly. 7 . We emphasize, the fact that a vehicle does not display a Nader Label is not determinative of the issue of reasonable suspicion because these labels are not required on all vehicles. While the alteration or removal of a Nader Label may be an indication that the vehicle is stolen, the absence of a Nader Label is one factor among others to consider. 8 .We recognize that the trooper in this case opened the door to the van and examined the doorjamb without Rodriguez's permission and that the two troopers also opened and looked under the hood of the van. Because we resolve this case on other grounds, we do not reach the question of whether these intrusions violated the Fourth Amendment. See, e.g., New York v. Class, 475 U.S. 106, 106 S.Ct. 960, 89 L.Ed.2d 81 (1986) (<HOLDING>); see generally 1 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and
holding that a search of a students purse that was not based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment holding that an arrest made by an officer outside his jurisdiction does not violate the fourth amendment holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest does not violate the fourth amendment holding that an officer did not violate the fourth amendment by moving papers on the dashboard covering the vin holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment