caused both by guerrillas and the military); Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 991-92 (9th Cir.2000) (detailing abduction and threats from guerrillas on account of political opinion imputed solely on the basis that petitioner was a teacher). Valiente-Herrera credibly testified that she believes it was the guerrillas who kidnaped her husband and threatened her with abduction. Although she could not provide direct evidence that the abductions were on account of political opinion, there is no evidence that the guerrillas attacked Valiente-Herrera and her family for any other reason. “[W]e ‘ha[ve] held persecution to be on account of political opinion where there appears to be no other logical reason for the persecution at issue.’ ” Rios v. Ashcroft, 287 F.3d 895, 900 (9th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Navas v. INS, 217 F.3d 646, 657 (9th
holding that guatemalan guerrillas abducted petitioner on account of imputed political opinion because of her relatives military service holding that attempted conscription by a guatemalan guerrilla group did not constitute persecution on account of a political opinion where petitioner failed to show that the group was motivated by his political opinion holding that a guatemalan who was persecuted because of his refusal to serve in a guerilla army was not persecuted on account of his political opinion holding there was sufficient evidence of persecution on account of imputed political opinion where guerillas abducted petitioner because her husband and broth er were members of the guatemalan army holding that persecutors statements indicating that they had chosen her because of her fathers relationship to the philippine government constituted persecution on account of an imputed political opinion