there is nothing in the current rules requiring the record on appeal to contain findings and conclusions when a magistrate court revokes a probationer’s probation. See Rule 6-703(F) (setting forth the contents of the record in an appeal from magistrate court). Any development or change in this area should be directed to our Supreme Court, our state’s rule-making authority. See Pub. Serv. Co. of N.M. v. Lyons, 2000-NMCA-077, ¶ 23, 129 N.M. 487, 10 P.3d 166 (discussing the law of privilege). Nor do we perceive any need to adopt such procedures or to require the magistrate court to make findings and conclusions because the availability of de novo review obviates the need for such new procedures, findings, and conclusions. See Gallegos, 2007-NMCA-112, ¶ 3, 142 N.M. 447, 166 P.3d 1101 (<HOLDING>). {27} Finally, we note that the State is
recognizing that because the magistrate court is not a court of record any record on appeal would only consist of papers filed in that court holding that appellate court may presume trial court took judicial no tice of its own record and that trial court record in that case supported prejudice element holding that the appeals court may affirm the ruling of the district court on any basis which the record supports holding that the court should make factual findings from the record evidence as if it were conducting a trial on the record holding that evidence not submitted to the district court cannot be part of the record on appeal