of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000d. In sum, Title VI prohibits exclusion from participation, or discrimination, in federally assisted programs. The proper defendant in such a case is the entity that receives federal financial assistance, not an individual. See e.g. Jackson v. University of New Haven, 228 F.Supp.2d 156, 158 (D.Conn.2002) (citing Bayon v. State Univ. of New York at Buffalo, No. 98 Civ. 0578E (SR), 2001 WL 135817, at *2 (W.D.N.Y.Feb.15, 2001)(“plaintiffs Title VI claims against the individual defendants in their individual capacities fail because this act does not provide for individual liability”), Jackson v. Katy Independent School District, 951 F.Supp. 1293, 1298 (S.D.Tex.1996) (<HOLDING>); Powers v. CSX Transp., Inc., 105 F.Supp.2d
holding that as title vi is a remedial statute the zone of interests to be protected  must be construed broadly holding plaintiff stated claim in his individual capacity holding title ix does not support an action against official in an individual capacity holding that a plaintiff can sue for retaliation under title vi holding that because the proper defendant in a title vi case is an entity rather than an individual plaintiff could not be sued in his individual capacity under title vi