as undeliverable. Yet Johnson did not file an opposition to the Motion. Johnson was reincarcerated on April 24, 2012 and, thereafter, filed several Requests for Counsel. (D.I. 63, 70, 72, 74, 76) On May 9, 2012, the clerk’s office sent Johnson a copy of the court docket, free of charge. (D.I. 79) Nonetheless, Johnson did not file an opposition to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Prior to his April 2012 reincarceration, Johnson had taken no action in the case since August 19, 2011. (D.I. 57, 63) The Court is mindful that Johnson did not file an opposition to Crocker’s motion for summary judgment. The Court will not grant the entry of summary judgment without considering the merits of Crock-er’s motion, although unopposed. See Stackhouse v. Mazurkiewicz, 951 F.2d 29, 30 (3d Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). V. DISCUSSION Crocker moves for summary
holding that a district court may not grant summary judgment without giving plaintiff an opportunity to submit materials admissible in a summary judgment proceeding or allowing a hearing on defendants motion holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment holding that district court should not have granted summary judgment solely on basis that motion for summary judgment was not opposed holding that the trial court did not err by granting defendants motion for summary judgment holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion