the door. When the door opened, Klein, who was in uniform, observed Richardson pointing a shotgun toward his chest. In this regard, the connection between illegal drugs and firearms is well established, United States v. Santos, 541 F.3d 63, 72 (2d Cir.2008), United States v. Gaskin, 364 F.3d 438, 457 (2d Cir.2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 990, 125 S.Ct. 1878, 161 L.Ed.2d 751 (2005), and “is undoubtedly at least as well known to police officers as to anyone.” United States v. Singleton, 608 F.Supp.2d at 404. It was therefore objectively reasonable for Klein to believe that the individuals inside 1955 E. Main Street Apartment A were involved in drug trafficking and possessed a weapon in fur therance their drug trafficking activities. United States v. Reyes, 353 F.3d 148, 154 (2d Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 1260, 127 S.Ct. 1391,
recognizing that firearms are regularly found on narcotics traffickers holding that evidence supported finding of constructive possession of concealed narcotics in part because narcotics paraphernalia was found in residence holding admissible police officers testimony that firearms are commonly used in drug trafficking recognizing firearms as common tools of the drug trade holding that juries may infer an intent to distribute narcotics from the presence of firearms