explicit images of minor females); Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v. Golden, 984 F.Supp.2d 1162 (M.D.Ala. 2013) (adult male allegedly molested minor female spending the night in his house); A.S. ex rel. J.S. v. Horace Mann Ins. Co., 2013 WL 3381378 (N.D.Ala. July 8, 2013) (teacher allegedly molested one of his minor students); Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Daniel, 2008 WL 4999097 (M.D.Ala. Nov. 20, 2008) (adult male pastor and school administrator allegedly molested minor female); Horace Mann Ins. Co. v. McGee, 840 F.Supp. 875 (M.D.Ala.1994) (adult male allegedly molested minor female students). 10 . See note 8, supra. 11 . See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Steele, 74 F.3d 878 (8th Cir.1996) (under Minnesota law, 16 year old’s intent inferred); B.B. v. Continental Ins. Co., 8 F.3d 1288 (8th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Allstate Ins. Co. v. Bailey, 723 F.Supp. 665,
holding that employers intent may be inferred through circumstantial evidence holding that inferred intent rule applies regardless of the age of the actor holding that missouri would adopt inferred intent rule in case of perpetrators who were 13 to 16 years old at the time of the offense holding intent may be inferred from large amount of marijuana holding intent may be inferred from all facts and circumstances