extensive latitude in questioning Rocchio’s wife about the contents of the records. Thus, he did not preclude Feole from using these records to establish part of the defense theory. Hearsay Feole also contends that certain portions of the testimony of Sergeant Doherty and John Rocchio constituted hearsay and should not have been admitted. Under Rule 801(c) of the Rhode Island Rules of Evidence, hearsay is defined as “a statement, other than one made by the declar-ant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.” To preserve this evidentiary issue on appeal, however, Feole was required to show us that he objected specifically to this evidence at trial and that he stated the grounds for his objection. See Brown, 709 A.2d at 477 (<HOLDING>). In the case at bar, Feole specifically raised
holding that claims based on grounds not objected to at trial cannot be considered on appeal holding party may not argue one ground at trial and another on appeal where appellant did not object to testimony at trial on the grounds raised on appeal that it was improper character evidence but objected only on the basis of relevancy issue was not preserved for review holding issues not raised before the district court are not preserved for appeal holding that a claimed violation of the right to a public trial must be preserved for review by a timely objection at trial holding that a trial justices claimed errors that are not specifically objected to at trial    are not preserved for consideration by this court on appeal