is to cause the specific result proscribed by the statute defining the offense.” Section 18-1-501(5), C.R.S.2006. Bodily injury means physical pain, illness, or any impairment of physical or mental condition. Section 18-l-901(3)(c), C.R.S. 2006. Intent can be proved by means other than direct evidence. A fact finder may infer intent to cause the natural and probable consequences of unlawful voluntary acts, and pertinent to the inquiry is the defendant’s conduct and the circumstances surrounding any act or omission. See People v. Juvenile Court, 813 P.2d 326, 330 (Colo.1991); People v. Howard, 89 P.3d 441, 444 (Colo.App.2003) (jurors could infer defendant’s specific intent from conduct and the overall circumstances); see also People v. Thompson, 121 P.3d 273, 278-79 (Colo.App.2005)(<HOLDING>). Here, construing the evidence previously
holding proof of possession of stolen goods is sufficient evidence to sustain conviction for theft holding that uncorroborated testimony of one witness is sufficient by itself to sustain a conviction recognizing that if there is evidence upon which one may reasonably infer an element of the crime the evidence is sufficient to sustain that element and where reasonable minds could differ the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction holding that the uncorroborated testimony of an informant may be sufficient to sustain a conviction holding that evidence tending to show knowing participation in the conspiracy is sufficient to sustain conspiracy conviction