ordered a temporary parenting plan pending a full hearing of Boling’s modification petition. But after denying the modification petition following a full evidentiary hearing, the court erred when it ordered an amended temporary parenting plan that imposed even more severe restrictions on Watson’s visitation with M.R. ¶43 We do not hold that a trial court lacks equitable discretion to order the gradual reunification of a parent and child following denial of a modification petition when the best interests of the child require it. A trial court retains its common law equitable powers over matters relating to the welfare of minor children to the extent consistent with the Parenting Act of 1987, chapter 26.09 RCW. In re Marriage of Possinger, 105 Wn. App. 326, 333-34, 19 P.3d 1109 (<HOLDING>), review denied, 145 Wn.2d 1008 (2001). Under
recognizing a trial courts common law authority to enter an interim rather than permanent parenting plan at the time of entry of a dissolution decree even in the absence of express statutory authority holding the court has the inherent authority to enter an order of confidentiality holding that appellate courts analyze plain error by reference to the law as of the time the appeal is decided rather than the extant law at the time of the disputed trial court ruling holding that while a purported agent must possess actual authority to accept service of process such authority may be implied rather than express recognizing the inherent common law authority of courts to promulgate rules of practice and procedure