involved use of explosives (including any explosive material or destructive device) or, by its nature, presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. Id. § 4B1.2(a), cmt. n. 1. We hold that felony driving under the influence is a crime of violence under USSG § 4B1.2. This follows from the plain language of the guideline, which encompasses offenses “involving] conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Id. § 4B1.2(a)(2) (emphasis added). Driving while intoxicated clearly presents a “serious potential risk of physical injury to another” and therefore is a crime of violence under § 4B1.2(a)(2). Other circuits have reached this conclusion in analogous cases. E.g., United States v. Rutherford, 54 F.3d 370, 371-72, 376-77 (7th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); United States v. DeSantiago-Gonzalez, 207
holding that assault conviction for driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and causing serious bodily injury to the person of another with the motor vehicle qualified as a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a holding that the evidence was insufficient to support a deadlyweapon finding because a motor vehicle is not a deadly weapon per se and there was no testimony in the record that defendant operated his vehicle in a manner that was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury holding that misdemeanor offense of driving while intoxicated constitutes a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a holding police officer had probable cause to believe defendant was operating a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol holding that the sensible and popular understanding of what a motor vehicle accident entails necessarily involves the motor vehicle being operated as a motor vehicle 