General and the state District Attorneys). The State of Iowa prohibits all private consumer fraud actions and limits the Iowa statute’s remedies to actions commenced by the state’s attorney general who may institute the action on behalf of either the state or the injured party. IOWA Code Ann. § 714.16(7). New Jersey permits actions under its consumer fraud statute where defendant’s fraud concerns the sale of goods or services purchased either for personal, family or household uses or for commercial or business uses. For cases allowing recovery of remedies under the NJCFA for fraudulent practices in the sale of goods or services purchased for personal, family or household uses, see e.g., Lemelledo v. Beneficial Management Corp. of America, 150 N.J. 255, 265, 696 A.2d 546, (1997) (<HOLDING>); Strawn v. Canuso, 140 N.J. 43, 59-61, 657
holding that the maximum statutory damages available to plaintiffs under the fdcpa is limited to 100000 per plaintiff per proceeding holding that a provision of the constitution is to be construed in the sense in which it was understood by the framers and the people at the time of its adoption but that if new products or circumstances that did not exist at the time the constitutional provision was enacted fall within the meaning of the provision the constitutional provision applies to them holding that the njcfa applies to the offering sale or provision of consumer credit  here 100000 loan for the education of plaintiffs daughter holding that the fcras provision that a lender may only use and obtain consumer credit information for the purpose of making a firm offer of credit requires that the lender offer something of value as an extension of credit alone holding that the commercial use requirement of section 1125c is virtually synonymous with the in connection with the sale offering for sale distribution or advertising of goods and services requirement of the lanham act