be actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, sufficient evidence must be presented showing that the action complained of was committed under color of state law and that said conduct worked a denial of rights secured by the United States Constitution. Romero-Barceló v. Hernández-Agosto, 75 F.3d 23, 32 (1st Cir.1996). There are two aspects to the second prong: (1) there must be an actual deprivation of a federally protected right; and (2) there must be a causal connection between defendants’ conduct and the deprivation of such right. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez v. Cartagena, 882 F.2d 553, 559 (1st Cir.1989). Additionally, the causal connection element requires that plaintiffs establish for each defendant, that the defendant’s own actions deprived the plaintiff of his or her protected rights. Id. at 562 (<HOLDING>). In addition, it is also set in stone that
holding that municipality may not be held liable under  1983 upon theory of respondeat superior holding that a municipality cannot be liable on a respondeat superior theory holding that liability may not be predicated upon a theory of respondeat superior because a supervisor can be liable only for his own acts or omissions holding that a party can be held liable for securities fraud on an agency or a respondeat superior theory recognizing respondeat superior liability