I see it. Q: And it doesn’t really matter whether you were Hispanic or Asian, it really had to do with how he treated some women who liked to play games with him, right ? A: Mm-hmm. Defendant’s Brief at pg. 34-35 (Deposition Testimony of Plaintiff Soto) (emphasis added). Further, the allegations in the record, though abhorrent, are not severe or pervasive enough to sustain a racially hostile work environment claim. “The plaintiff cannot simply rely on these few isolated incidents and a general, unsupported allegation of a constant barrage of racial comments and ethnic slurs by [Tanner] to support [her] hostile work environment claim.” Gonzales v. Western Resources, Inc., 36 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1295 (D.Kan.1999); see Elmahdi v. Marriott Hotel Serv., Inc., 339 F.3d 645, 653 (8th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Burkett v. Glickman, 327 F.3d 658, 661-62
holding insufficient to sustain hostile work environment claim the fact that plaintiff was called black boy on a few occasions by coworker and that a coworker made the comment that africans had big penises recognizing a hostile work environment claim under section 1983 holding that ajlthough a continuing pattern of hostile or abusive behavior is ordinarily required to establish a hostile environment a single instance can suffice when it is sufficiently egregious and holding that the plaintiff established that she suffered a sexually hostile working environment where she alleged she was raped by a male coworker holding that a viable hostile work environment claim requires an environment that a reasonable person would find hostile or abusive holding that a work environment did not contain pervasive harassment when the plaintiff made general allegations of frequent sexual slurs and the only specific incident cited involved a coworker grabbing the plaintiff