by Kaigler is whether the illegality of a stop during which a suspect allegedly commits resisting with violence and battery of a law enforcement officer causes a failure of the statutory elements just noted. Our own precedent answers the question in the negative and requires us to affirm Kaigler’s convictions. See Nesmith v. State, 616 So.2d 170, 171-72 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993) (“The use of force in resisting arrest by a person reasonably known to be a law enforcement officer is unlawful notwithstanding the technical illegality of the arrest.”); see also Lang v. State, 826 So.2d 433, 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (in dicta, extending the Nesmith principle to illegal stops). Other district courts of appeal have ruled similarly. See, e.g., Perry v. State, 846 So.2d 684, 589 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>), review granted, 894 So.2d 971 (Fla.2005);
holding that resisting arrest is lesser offense of assault on an officer holding that an officers noncompliance with the strip search statute was not a defense to resisting an officer with violence holding that juveniles flight from the scene of an automobile theft when ordered by police officers to stop was insufficient to support resisting arrest without violence holding that strip search incident to arrest was not per se unreasonable but holding that search was performed in an unreasonable manner when conducted in view of the public holding that an officer could be held liable for failing to intervene in preventing an unlawful strip search