nothing about an agency’s own conduct. In this case-and presumably in the typical case in which one private citizen is seeking information about another-the requester does not intend to discover anything about the conduct of the agency that has possession of the requested records. Indeed, response to this request would not shed any light on the conduct of any Government agency or official. Reporters Comm., 489 U.S. at 773, 109 S.Ct. 1468. “Information that reveals ‘little or nothing about an agency’s own conduct’ does not further the statutory purpose; thus the public has no cognizable interest in the release of such information.” Beck v. Dep’t of Justice, 997 F.2d 1489, 1493 (D.C. Cir. 1993) (quoting Reporters Comm., 489 U.S. at 773, 109 S.Ct. 1468); see also Davis, 968 F.2d at 1282 (<HOLDING>). Nonetheless, while the public interest cannot
holding that agency could not claim national security disclosure exemption where documents already released to the press holding that a draft of a proposed letter from an area director of a government agency to a municipal administrative agency was properly excluded because it did not represent an agency finding holding that the only relevant public interest in disclosure is the extent to which disclosure would serve the core purpose of the foia which is contributing significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities of the government  recognizing the individuals interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters holding that public interest in individuals alleged involvement in criminal activity insignificant because disclosure would reveal little to nothing about agency conduct let alone conduct of the agency possessing the documents