in the entireties into a tenancy in common, so a 50/50 split from a subsequent sale is the natural result. Similarly, when a consensual sale occurs, both parties consent to the sale, effectively surrendering their survivor interests and their right to prevent sale. Only then is the sale effectuated, and a 50/50 split is, again, the natural result. With a sale pursuant to § 7403, however, the value of the non-delinquent spouse’s interests must be determined prior to the § 7403 order, by which the court will extinguish those rights. Valuation of property interests under § 7403 cannot occur as if the non-delinquent spouse had already surrendered her interests. To do so would raise the unsightly specter of a taking without just compensation. See Rodgers, 461 U.S. at 697, 103 S.Ct. 2132 (<HOLDING>). Mrs. Barr has legitimate property interests
holding that the defendants property interest requires a preseizure hearing holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property recognizing that eontract rights are a form of property and as such may be taken for a public purpose provided that just compensation is paid holding that  7403 requires compensation for every property interest that is taken in the process holding that a sublessee had no property interest taken by the city