agreement, complications will arise. But as long as courts attend t Class Members" to include the members of all three subclasses. 25 . See In re Cendant Corp. Prides Litig., 233 F.3d 188, 194 (3d Cir.2000) ("In a class action settlement, a court retains special responsibility to see' to the administration of justice.”). 26 . Mirfasihi v. Fleet Mortg. Corp., 356 F.3d 781, 784 (7th Cir.2004). 27 . The members of Subclass C suffered economic injury: damage to and loss of the value of property. These liquidated claims were fully compensated under the terms of settlement. Accordingly, none contends that the claimants in Subclass C have a persuasive equitable claim to the unused medical-moni toning funds. See supra note 16 and accompanying text. 28 . E.g., Masters, 473 F.3d at 436 (<HOLDING>). 29 . Thus, this is not a case where it was
holding that it is an abuse of discretion for a district court to order a cy pres distribution when any party to or participant in a class action  including the defendant and class counsel  has a valid equitable interest in the unclaimed settlement funds holding that the district court abused its discretion by ordering a cy pres distribution where neither side contended that each class members recovery would be so small as to make an individual distribution economically impracticable holding that joinder is impracticable where the class consisted of at least fifty members holding that the district court abused its discretion by decertifying the class without permitting class counsel reasonable time to determine whether a new class representative could be substituted holding that class action was superior to individual suits where class members had relatively small interests and might not have the wherewithal to bring suit to protect their individual rights