alleged that the County willfully violated the FLSA. In United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co., 896 F.2d 200, 203 (6th Cir.1990), the court interpreted a similar errors or omissions policy to not cover intentional acts. The Fireman’s Fund policy did not specifically exclude intentional acts of the insured. The exclusions in that policy, like the exclusions here, were for dishonest, fraudulent, criminal or malicious acts. The court concluded that the only reasonable construction was that the insurance company “contracted to provide coverage for negligent — not intentional acts ****’’ Id. A willful violation of the FLSA does not constitute a “negligent act or omission.” Cf. City of Fort Pierre v. United Fire & Casualty Co., 463 N.W.2d 845, 848 (S.D. 1990) (<HOLDING>). Also, the FLSA is a federal statute that
holding negligent act error or omissions policy did not cover citys intentional decision to ignore federal government permit requirements recognizing torts of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress holding that intentional acts exclusion applies to intentional act of child molestation holding insureds general assertion that it expected a liability policy to cover such negligent acts as insured was alleged to have committed would not support application of reasonable expectations doctrine holding that the conditional grant of federal funds to ohio for highway projects did not make the federal government liable for ohios acts or omissions