2 P.3d 66, 69-72 (Alaska 2000); Beaulieu v. Elliott, 434 P.2d 665, 670 (Alaska 1967)). 72 . Sarah D. v. John D., 352 P.3d 419, 429 (Alaska 2015) (quoting Merrill v. Merrill, 368 P.2d 546, 548 (Alaska 1962)) (citing Alaska R. Civ. P. 52(a); John N. v. Desiree N., No. 14578, 2013 WL 1933133, at *5 (Alaska May 8, 2013)). 73 . AS 25.24.150(g); see AS 25.24.150(j). 74 . AS 25.24.150(h). 75 . See AS 25.90.010 (referring to definition in AS 18.66.990(3)). 76 . See AS 18.66.990(3). 77 . AS 25.24.150(g). 78 . See AS 25.24.150; AS 25.90.010. 79 . See Lisa Bolotin, Note, When Parents Fight; Alaska’s Presumption Against Awarding Custody to Perpetrators of Domestic Violence, 25 Alaska L. Rev. 263, 281-84(2008). 80 . See discussion infra Section IV.D.2.C. 81 . 177 P.3d 830, 836-38 (Alaska 2008) (<HOLDING>), 82 . See Bolotin, supra note 79, at 283-84.
holding as relevant in a murder case a history of domestic violence involving defendant and his victim holding in custody dispute that fathers alleged domestic violence in an earlier marriage must be considered for purposes of as 2524150gi holding that children are often physically assaulted or witness violence against one of their parents and may suffer deep and lasting emotional harm from victimization and from exposure to family violence consequently a family law judge should take domestic violence into account when making an award of temporary eustodyt based upon a recognition that it is clear that where domestic violence is present it should be considered when determining parental fitness holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred holding that previous domestic violence finding did not have res judicata effect in proceeding to modify visitation because domestic violence and visitation modification proceedings are different causes of action