wherein she informed him of the need for documentary evidence, and that she had several phone conversations with Lin. It does not adopt these as findings, nor does it find that the content of any conversations with Lin were about the substance of the case as opposed to prodding Zhong to finalize arrangements to retain her. The BIA makes no finding that counsel’s preparation for the hearing e Cir.2000). Tf counsel was unprepared to present Lin’s claim, she should have sought to withdraw as counsel, even as late as the date of the hearing. Lin’s right to a full and fair presentation of his claim included the right to have an attorney who would present a viable legal argument on his behalf supported by relevant evidence, if he could find one willing and able to do so. See 8 U.S.C. § 1362 (<HOLDING>); Rios-Berrios v. INS, 776 F.2d 859, 863 (9th
recognizing right to privately retained counsel recognizing a defendants right to dismiss retained counsel in favor of appointed counsel recognizing constitutional right to effective counsel recognizing that a criminal defendants right to counsel is the right to the effective assistance of counsel recognizing the right to counsel on appeal