in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility, the court shall, if the court believes that such a requirement would be appropriate and in the interests of justice, continue such a case for a period of not to exceed 180 days in order to require exhaustion of such plain, speedy, and eff edy is unavailable if it does not provide the form of relief sought by an inmate plaintiff because a remedy is available only if it can be availed for the "accomplishment of a purpose”) (citations omitted). 18 . Congress' intent to conserve judicial resources would be undermined were courts required to examine grievance procedures in each case to determine whether those procedures provided every remedy sought by a prisoner plaintiff. Alexander, 159 F.3d at 1326. See also Spence, 993 F.Supp. at 788 (<HOLDING>). 19 . This was intended and contemplated by
recognizing that exhaustion of state administrative remedies is not a prerequisite to bringing a  1983 action holding that congress in enacting the plra was not inviting federal courts to formulate some fifty different rules of federal exhaustion based on the existence of state administrative remedies capable of achieving certain ends holding that courts have consistently required exhaustion of administrative remedies under foia recognizing that issue exhaustion requirement and requirement exhaustion of remedies are different holding that exhaustion is not required because the structure of the federal statute shows that congress did not intend to incorporate varying state exhaustion requirements into federal law as a prerequisite to federal district court review