ready to reintegrate into society. Its purpose is to help individuals reintegrate into society as constructive individuals as soon as they are able, without being confined for the full term of the sentence imposed. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 477-78, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). When this definition is considered, it is clear that MSR fits within the framework of parole systems, as prisoners in MSR are “required to serve the balance of [their] sentenee[s] outside of confinement on the condition that [they] abide by certain rules.” Huschak, 642 F.Supp.2d at 1276. “It does not matter whether the conditions [are] voluntary or involuntary,” since, “[a]s the Supreme Court stated, under some parole systems release is automatic.” Id.; see also Moultrie, 723 F.Supp.2d at 1236 (<HOLDING>); Miller, 2011 WL 4402497 (same). Further,
holding defendant does not waive fourth amendment protection by signing parole agreement but the search condition does confirm right of parole officer to conduct reasonable searches within scope of parole mission holding that the parole regulations numerical system is not a rigid formula  because the board is not required to either grant or deny parole based upon the score attained holding that msr is a system of parole holding that parole is not a right in pennsylvania holding that the state courts decision to uphold the parole boards denial of parole was an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence