on a highway, or while an occupant was inside the vehicle or near it and the vehicle was readily capable of being driven away by the occupant. See Dyson, 527 U.S. at 466-67, 119 S.Ct. 2013; Labron, 518 U.S. at 939-40, 116 S.Ct. 2485; Carney, 471 U.S. at 388-93, 105 S.Ct. 2066; Thomas, 458 U.S. at 261, 102 S.Ct. 3079 ("[WJlhen police officers have probable cause to believe there is contraband inside an automobile that has been stopped on the road, the officers may conduct a warrant, less search of the vehicle ...." (emphasis added)); Texas v. White, 423 U.S. 67, 67-68, 96 S.Ct. 304, 46 L.Ed.2d 209 (1975) (per curiam); Chambers, 399 U.S. at 51-52, 90 S.Ct. 1975; Carroll, 267 U.S. at 162, 45 S.Ct. 280. Cf. Coolidge v. New Hampshire, 403 U.S. 443, 478, 91 S.Ct. 2022, 29 L.Ed.2d 564 (1971) (<HOLDING>). The Supreme Court has never removed the ready
holding warrantless search of vehicle was improper where car was not stopped on a highway but was parked at a residence with no occupants inside or near the vehicle and capable of being driven away by the turn of an ignition key holding automobile exeeption did not apply to warrantless search of vehicle where vehicle was not readily mobile because the vehicle was legally parked in parking lot occupants of vehicle were seated on a bench in the playground near the parking lot police officers surrounded the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle was handcuffed for safety purposes holding belton did not extend to search of vehicle incident to arrest of individual who has parked locked and walked fifteen to twenty feet away from an automobile before being stopped and arrested holding that the stop of defendants vehicle was unlawful where officers stopped the vehicle to check the license and registration but had observed no suspicious activity holding warrantless entry of residence was justified by need to search for intruders or injured occupants