otherwise have little incentive to do so. See H.R.Rep. No. 99-660, at 22 (1986) (“The purpose of the qui ta/m provisions of the False Claims Act is to encourage private individuals who are aware of fraud being perpetrated against the Government to bring such information forward.”); S.Rep. No. 99-345, at 14 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266, 5279 (stating that the False Claims Act “reward[s] those private individuals who take significant personal risks to bring such wrongdoing to light”); id. at 6, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5266, 5271 (“The Committee believes changes are necessary to halt the so-called ‘conspiracy of silence’ that has allowed fraud against the Government to flourish.”); United States ex rel. Dick v. Long Island Lighting Co., 912 F.2d 13, 18 (2d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). These purposes are accomplished by giving the
holding that the public disclosure limitation discourages persons with relevant information from remaining silent and encourages them to report such information at the earliest possible time holding that the acts duty of good faith includes the disclosure of information relevant to the employers bargaining position holding that lists of persons who visited with inmates are exempt from disclosure because information is confidential by constitutional law holding that the disclosure is a public disclosure within the meaning of the fca if the the prior public disclosure  contained enough information to enable the government to pursue an investigation against the defendant recognizing that information disclosed in private is not a public disclosure under the fca