Rule 12(e) motion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(g) (“A party who makes a motion under this rule may join with it any other motions herein provided for and then available to the party.”). When presented with an appropriate Rule 12(e) motion for a more definite statement, the district court shall grant the motion and demand more specific factual allegations from the plaintiff concerning the conduct underlying the claims for relief. Even when a defendant has not formally expressed the need for a definite statement, the district court has the discretion to order a more definite statement, in observance of the Supreme Court’s mandate to facilitate an early resolution of the qualified immunity issue and in order to avoid a waste of judicial resources. See Craivford-El, 523 U.S. at 600-01, 118 S.Ct. 1584 (<HOLDING>); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 1 (“The[] [rules] shall
recognizing the district courts broad discretion to utilize civil procedures in a manner that is useful and equitable to the parties holding that district courts discretion is extremely broad holding that the apportionment of cercla liability under  113f among various responsible parties is an equitable undertaking within the broad discretion of the district court holding that courts of appeals should review all aspects of the district courts rule 11 determination for abuse of discretion and noting that the district court has broad discretion to impose rule 11 sanctions recognizing that the district court is afforded broad discretion in ruling on motions for relief from judgment