“inured directly and materially to the benefit of the Notehold-ers.” The Court concludes that the services performed by WTC and its attorneys in this category that provided a benefit only for the Noteholders are not compensable as an administrative claim. To the extent WTC performed services at the request of the Committee, however, WTC did make a substantial contribution to the case. Fees in the amount of $57,593 for this category will be allowed as an administrative claim under section 503(b)(3)(D) and 503(b)(4). c. Committee/'General WTC incurred the bulk of its fees in the Committee/General category. Routine activities of a Committee member do not rise to the level of .a substantial contribution. See, e.g., In re Columbia Gas Sys., Inc., 224 B.R. 540, 548 (Bankr. D.Del.1998) (<HOLDING>); Granite Partners, 213 B.R. at 445 (holding
holding that a bankruptcy courts decision to convert or dismiss a chapter 11 case is a matter within its discretion holding that the good faith analysis for evaluating a chapter 11 petition and that in evaluating a chapter 11 plan are distinct holding in a case where a chapter 11 trustee was appointed after a period during which the debt or had operated as debtor in possession that a chapter 11 trustee has two years from the date of his appointment not from the commencement of the chapter 11 case to bring avoidance actions holding denial of motion to convert from chapter 11 to chapter 7 is interlocutory holding that expected or routine activities in a chapter 11 case do not constitute substantial contribution