Petitioner Runkui Wang, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order from the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming without opinion the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a), and we deny the petition for review. “When the BIA summarily affirms the IJ’s decision, we review the IJ’s decision as the final agency action.” Pagayon v. Holder, 675 F.3d 1182, 1188 (9th Cir.2011) (internal quotation marks omitted). Legal questions are review r.2001) (<HOLDING>); Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336, 339 (9th
holding that minor abuse during brief detention did not compel finding of past persecution holding that a finding of persecution was not compelled where an alien was arrested detained at a police station for three days interrogated for two hours and hit ten times with a rod in a manner that caused temporary red marks but required no medieal treatment holding that the record did not compel a finding of persecution where an alien was detained for five or six days holding that detention of five or six days on account of imputed political opinion without beatings tortures or threats did not rise to the level of persecution holding that a four to six hour detention during which the alien was hit in the stomach and kicked from behind did not compel a finding of persecution