1008-09 (D.C.2002) (same); Am. Online, Inc. v. Booker, 781 So.2d 423, 425 (Fla.App.2001) (same). Whether the forum selection clause also binds Julie is a closer call. Julie’s only role in the transaction was to provide Mary with her credit card number after Adsit informed Mary that company policy required that a customer’s shipping and billing addresses be the same. Mary then placed the order, using Julie’s credit card number and address to complete the transaction. Thus, Julie did not personally accept Adsit’s policy, including the forum selection clause. If Mary was acting as Julie’s agent, however, then Julie is bound to the terms of the contract, including the forum selection clause. See Heritage Dev. of Ind., Inc. v. Opportunity Options, Inc., 773 N.E.2d 881, 888 (Ind.Ct.App.2002) (<HOLDING>). In determining whether a person is acting as
holding that a principal is bound by a contract entered into by the principals agent on her behalf if the agent had authority to bind the principal holding that agency relationship existed where principal paid plaintiff directly and written agreement stated agent was signing on behalf of principal recognizing that statements made by agent on behalf of principal to principals attorney may be protected by principals attorneyclient privilege holding that when an agent has limited authority and informs the third party of this limitation the principal is not bound by the agents actions that exceed that authority holding a power of attorney allows a principal to convey to an agent the authority to act on its behalf in identified matters