e.g., Int’l Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, 312 N.L.R.B. at 127 (finding that a union violated the Act where its stated reasons for permanently expelling an employee from the hiring hall were not genuine); Int’l Ass’n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Ironworkers, Local 118, 309 N.L.R.B. 808, 811, 1992 WL 389435 (1992) (concluding that a union violated its duty of fair representation in departing from its own contractual standards in administering its referral system); Plumbers & Steamfitters Local No. 40, 242 N.L.R.B. 1157, 1161, 1979 WL 9190 (1979) (finding that a union's resort to self-help in disregard of contractual procedures for resolving hiring hall dispute established a violation of the Act). See also Local 357, Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 365 U.S. at 676, 81 S.Ct. 835 (<HOLDING>). In light of our determination that the
holding that the board may not dictate specific procedures and rules that a union must adopt not that the board errs when it determines that a union engaged in unfair labor practices by failing to operate in accordance with objective criteria holding that questioning of employees about number of union cards signed placing employees in a position of having to admit or deny union support and participating in antiunion petition were all unfair labor practices holding that a rico action by union members was properly dismissed where any financial improprieties occurred with union funds and directly injured solely the union recognizing that union members interests are adequately represented by the union holding that a union officials comments may be used to infer the object of union activity