Because § 3377(a) renders legal under the Lacey Act all fishing practices explicitly allowed by the Magnuson Act, the Magnuson Act effectiv rom December 30, 1992, through March 30, 1993, but was subsequently extended. See, e.g., Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, 58 Fed.Reg. 13,-560 (1993). 3 . A decision of a “Unit B" panel of the former Fifth Circuit is binding on the Eleventh Circuit, even if the decision was issued after September 30, 1981. See Matter of Int'l Horizons, Inc., 689 F.2d 996, 1004 n. 17 (11th Cir.1982). 4 . Because the Magnuson Act has no general repeal provision, we need not decide whether such a provision would have indicated Congress’s intent that 16 U.S.C. § 1857(1)(I) preempt 18 . U.S.C. § 1001. Cf. United States v. Richardson, 8 F.3d 15, 17 (9th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). 5 .See also In re Coastal Group, Inc., 13
holding that the defendant could be prosecuted for making false claims against the government under either the false claims statute 18 usc  287 or the mail and wire fraud statutes 18 usc  1341 1343 holding that where defendant lied to a federal magistrate performing an administrative function there was a violation of 18 usc  1001 holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001 holding that good faith is a defense to the willful filing of false statements under 18 usc  1001 holding that 18 usc  1920 the misdemeanor false statement provision of the federal employees compensation act feca preempted 18 usc  1001 because  41 of feca expressly repealed all inconsistent statutes