added), while § 2702(a)(4) states, "[a] person is guilty of aggravated assault if he: (4) attempts to cause or intentionally or knowingly causes bodily injury to another with a deadly weapon.” IcL., (emphasis added). 8 . A review of the certified record before us reveals appellant failed to file a pretrial motion to quash the information wherein he avers he was charged improperly with § 2702(a)(1) of the Crimes Code. Accordingly, this issue is arguably waived due to appellant's failure to raise the challenge at his first opportunity in a pretrial motion to quash. Compare Pa.R.Crim.P. 578, Omnibus Pretrial Motion for Relief, with Commonwealth v. Parmar, 448 Pa.Super. 470, 672 A.2d 314 (1996), appeal granted, 546 Pa. 640, 683 A.2d 879 (1996), affirmed, 551 Pa. 318, 710 A.2d 1083 (1998) (<HOLDING>). We have elected to address the merit of
recognizing that the appellants claim on appeal had been abandoned because although his motion for a coa  briefly asserted the claim he did not brief the issue holding that an appellant has no standing to raise a due process issue where he has not shown that the alleged deficiency in the notice had any connection in fact with his own failure to seek review of the denial of his claim holding that the defendant waived an argument by failing to raise it in his appellants brief holding that while an appellants claim he was charged with the wrong crime may be waived due to his failure to properly preserve the issue by filing a pretrial motion to quash the waiver doctrine will not be applied where the statutes in question do not irreconcilably conflict on their face holding that a challenge to the weight of the evidence is waived for failure to present the issue first to the trial court