and turn over the proceeds in service of the restitution judgment. Doc. 163 at ¶ 3. The Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (“MVRA”) authorizes the United States to enforce restitution awards “in accordance -with the practices and procedures for the enforcement of a civil judgment under Federal law or State law.” 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a). The MVRA provides, however, that the Government may not enforce an award in a way that violates “section 303 of the Consumer Credit Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 1673),” 18 U.S.C. § 3613(a)(3), which provides in turn that “the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek which is subjected to garnishment may not exceed ... 25 per centum of his disposable earnings 6 F.2d 107, 110-11 (9th Cir.1978) (Kennedy, J.) (<HOLDING>). And by specifying that “earnings” include
recognizing that district court may take into account adverse impact on incarceration caused by status as deportable alien holding that filing an answer  does not invoke the status as a defendant in plaintiffs lawsuit holding that pro se petitioners need not raise issues in ins terms but may raise them as they may have understood them holding that plaintiffs status as thirdparty beneficiaries cannot be used as both a sword to reap the benefits    and a shield to protect them holding that wages lose them status as earnings when deposited in a savings account