owner giving the invitation within thirty days of-the participating party’s receipt of the invitation.” [¶ 12] The source notes for N.D. Admin. Code § 43-02-03-16.3 and historical documents at the legislative council reflect the version of the rule cited by the parties was adopted effective April 1, 2010, and no language indicates the 2010 version was intended to be retroactive. See Gerhardt v. C.K., 2008 ND 136, ¶¶ 7-8, 751 N.W.2d 702 (involving 2005 provision of Uniform Parentage Act, which explicitly stated it did not apply retroactively, and applying 1993 statute). The same source notes and historical documents reflect the regulation governing Slawson’s July 8, 2009 invitation to participate was adopted effective January 1, 2008. See State v. Dimmler, 456 N.W.2d 297, 298 (N.D.1990) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 13] In other contexts, we have said issues
holding correct date to use when determining controlling statute is date upon which claim arose holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act holding that plaintiff could amend its process to correct return date even though return date already passed holding that the statute does not begin to run until at least a demand has been made upon the government but determining that the facts of that case made it unnecessary to choose between the date of demand and the date of actual payment as the triggering date for the running of the statute of limitations holding that the date of discrimination is the date on which a decision not to hire a plaintiff becomes effective