So.2d 756 (Ala.Crim.App.1984)] and Webb’s case now before us is that in Bragg II, in the appellate review of the transfer order (Bragg I [416 So.2d 715 (Ala.1982)]), this Court affirmed the affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals of the transfer order, while in Webb’s case, in the appellate review of the transfer order, we reversed the affirmance by the Court of Criminal Appeals of the transfer order because it did not comply with § 12-15 — 34(d), Ex parte Anonymous, [466 So.2d 81 (Ala.1984)]. A more precisely pertinent distinction is that, during the pendency of an appeal of a transfer order, merely receiving but not adjudicating an indictment (Bragg IT) is vastly different from actually adjudicating the indictment (Webb).” Cf. Tuck v. State, 686 So.2d 487, 488 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (<HOLDING>). Rule 32.3, Ala. R.Crim. P., states that “The
holding the appellate court lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal where the circuit court had the power to remand the agency decision for further proceedings holding in an appeal from the denial of a rule 32 petition that the appellants claim that the circuit court erred in not ruling on his motion to subpoena a transcript of his guilty plea proceedings was not preserved for review because the circuit court never ruled on the motion and the appellant never objected to the circuit courts failure to rule on the motion holding that rule 32 petition should have been granted where defendant was convicted in circuit court on indictment entered while case was on appeal from transfer order because circuit court lacked jurisdiction where we remanded the case to the juvenile court for further proceedings holding that when the district court dismissed rather than transferred a case not within its jurisdiction and a party appealed that dismissal the circuit court could consider only the propriety of the dismissal on appeal and determining that the circuit court lacked jurisdiction on appeal to consider the merits of the action holding that when the district court improperly purported to transfer to the circuit court an action over which the circuit court lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter its judgment which was void and dismissing the appeal from that void judgment