may assert the rights contained in section 503(b)(9).” Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-8, § 1227, 119 Stat. 23, 199-200. Neither party has suggested that section 503(b)(9) has any relevance to this appeal, and we do not specifically address its interaction with section 502(d). 3 . The district court also ruled in the alternative that, if the court of appeals decided the finality issue differently, it would grant ASM leave to file an interlocutory appeal. 4 . For instance, the official form for filing a proof of claim pursuant to section 501 explicitly states “This form should not be used 'to make’ a claim for an administrative expense arising after the commencement of the case. A request for payment of an administrative expense m r.2008) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, it generally will be more
holding that the bankruptcy code endows the bankruptcy trustee with the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate holding that it was within the bankruptcy courts equitable powers to award damages in an action for fraud on the court holding that if dispute involves funds that are not property of estate it cannot be maintained in the bankruptcy court unless it is related to the bankruptcy proceeding which means it is likely to affect the debtors estate holding claimant waived right to jury trial on claims brought against it on behalf of bankruptcy estate when it submitted its proof of claim against the estate and subjected itself to the equitable powers of the bankruptcy court holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added