1770, 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993). However, we have “applied a more relaxed standard for finding a waiver of venue rights than for finding waiver of other constitutional rights in criminal trials.” Miller, 111 F.3d at 750. Indeed, a defendant may “waive venue rights by his inaction.” Id.-, 2 Wright, supra, § 306, at 343 (“The courts [] have also found a waiver of venue from the inaction of defendant. The absence of an objection to venue, or a motion specifically raising the defect, has been held to constitute a waiver.”). “[A] party that has waived a right is not entitled to appellate relief.” United States v. Teague, 443 F.3d 1310, 1314 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 247, 166 L.Ed.2d 194 (2006); see also United States v. Carrasco-Solazar, 494 F.3d 1270, 1273 (10th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). A defendant can waive improper venue when it
holding that lack of complete record precluded appellate review of alleged incurable jury argument holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review holding that appellate review is precluded when the error is invited holding where challenge was waived that appellate review is precluded holding that there is no due process right to appellate review