CURIAM. Affirmed. See Stanley v. State, 947 So.2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (<HOLDING>); Parrish v. State, 780 So.2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA
holding that where original sentencing judge imposed a guidelines sentence defendant could not be sentenced as a habitual offender upon violation of probation holding for crimes committed on or after october 1 1988 the sentencing guidelines do not apply to habitual offender sentences holding that predicate crimes for which defendant received probation and adjudication could be considered for purposes of habitual offender enhancement holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony holding that a defendant sentenced as an habitual offender who later successfully challenges one of his predicate offenses may have his habitual offender status and sentencing enhancement vacated through postconviction relief or a motion to correct erroneous sentence