by the trier of fact. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s decision granting the defendants’ motion for summary disposition of plaintiffs’ claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings. We do not retain jurisdiction. 1 Summary disposition previously had been granted for the Felician Sisters of O.S.F. of Livonia. That ruling has not been appealed. 2 See also Winstead, supra, wherein this Court concluded that a cause of action for public disclosure of embarrassing private facts may exist where a newspaper published intimate details about the plaintiff’s private life, including the fact that she had several abortions. 3 See California v Greenwood, 486 US 35, 40; 108 S Ct 1625; 100 L Ed 2d 30 (1988) (<HOLDING>). See also People v Whotte, 113 Mich App 12,
holding that the constitutional protection of an individuals reasonable expectation of privacy in his or her home does not extend to a place of business holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage placed in trash cans holding that defendant lacked reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage located outside curtilage of home holding a person who is present at anothers home with permission simply for the purpose of consummating a business transaction does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy there holding that for purposes of federal constitutional law a person does not possess a reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to trash discarded outside the home