injury to: (B) a person less than fourteen (14) years of age and is committed by a person at least eighteen (18) years of age. Johnson argues that the evidence is insufficient to support her conviction for battery. First, Johnson argues that the evidence is insufficient to prove that A.J. sustained a bodily injury. Specifically, Johnson contends that the evidence was insufficient because the State relied on McKenzie's uncorroborated testimony to prove the bodily injury element of the battery charge and did not introduce any physical evidence. Second, Johnson ar gues that her conviction for battery should be reversed because she had legal authority to discipline A.J. First, the evidence at the bench trial was sufficient to show that Johnson caused bodily injury to A.J. Bodily App.2003) (<HOLDING>), trans. denied; Tucker, 725 N.E.2d at 898
holding that witnesss testimony was sufficient to support the trial courts finding that defendant committed battery that resulted in bodily injury holding evidence sufficient to support trial courts finding in aggravation that the offense was planned holding that the fatal injury to a murder victim may be considered as satisfying the bodily injury component of the capital felony of kidnapping with bodily injury holding that the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for aggravated battery when the bodily member that is lost or rendered useless in the battery is a tooth holding witnesss testimony identifying appellant is sufficient standing alone to support conviction