upon the registered instrument the time of filing and a reference to the volume and page where it is registered.” Minn.Stat. § 508.55. The statute does not require the registrar to note upon the certificate or elsewhere the date or time of memorialization, and the registrar does not do so. The “Date of Registration,” set forth under the above-referenced column heading, reflects the month, day, year and time that the instrument is filed with the registrar. I would conclude therefore that the priority of competing interests in registered land is determined by the date of filing with the registrar, not the date on which an instrument is memorialized on a certificate of title. This position is supported by case law. See In re Ocwen Fin. Servs., Inc., 649 N.W.2d 854, 857 (Minn.App.2002) (<HOLDING>). I would hold that respondents’ mortgages were
holding that the automatic stay applies to the debt ors appeal of an order entered in action brought against the debtor in the lower court holding that the lower court lacked jurisdiction to hear the case because it was filed without proper authority holding on appeal the judgment of the lower court is presumed to be correct and the burden is on the appellant to present to us a sufficient record from which we can determine whether the lower court has erred in the respect complained of holding that the registration numbers are conclusive evidence of the order in which the mortgages were filed and granting priority to the interest with the lower registration number holding that a lower court should not take any action once appeal is filed which would interfere with the appeal process or with the appellate courts jurisdiction