in any way defective. The motorcycle operated well; it was driver error that caused the accident. ¶ 11. Furthermore, we conclude that in undertaking to retail motorcycles by providing test drives, defendant is neither “performing a service of great importance to the public, which is often a matter of practical necessity for some members of the public,” nor holding itself “out as willing to perform this service for any member of the public who seeks it.” Tunkl, 383 P.2d at 445. Motorcycle dealerships do not provide a public service, which is a necessity for some members of the public. See Jones v. Dressel, 623 P.2d 370, 377 (Colo. 1981) (concluding that flight service for parachute jumping was not a matter of public interest); Mann v. Wetter, 785 P.2d 1064, 1066-67 (Or. Ct. App. 1989) (<HOLDING>); Blide v. Rainier Mountaineering, Inc., 636
holding that public meeting did not satisfy public participation requirement because public did not receive adequate notice holding that there were no public policy considerations to prevent a diving school from limiting liability for its own negligence holding that service is not avoided by service on a partys attorney as service on an attorney is ineffective unless he has been authorized to accept such service holding that diving school did not provide an essential public service recognizing that public utilities affect the public interest in that they render essential public services to a large number of the general public