in accordance with then-agreement. 1 . 35.30 of the hours expended by Ms. Adams was travel time charged at a rate of $95.00 per hour, which this Court finds reasonable. The remaining 777.50 hours was non-travel time which, as discussed above, the Court will reduce from $190.00 per hour to $125.00 per hour. 2 . The Court reduced for all attorneys certain hours that it deemed unnecessary, redundant, inadequately documented, wasteful, or too time consuming. In particular the Court reduced for all attorneys time spent on media relations and McGuire Woods Boothe & Battle, LLP's (“McGuire Woods) potential conflict of interest issue because that issue was not significant, nor a benefit Plaintiff-Intervenors sought in bringing the action. See Leffler v. Meer, 60 F.3d 369, 373 (7th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). 3 . Wherever there are two dates listed in
holding that plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys fees for time spent litigating the fees issue on appeal under title viis attorneys fee provision holding that the court had appellate jurisdiction to review the merits of the case because only the collateral issue of attorneys fees remained to be decided on remand to the bankruptcy court holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award holding that the plaintiffs were not prevailing parties entitled to attorneys fees for successfully securing a remand of the attorneys fees issue because the ruling was unrelated to the merits of the plaintiffs claim and the issue was not significant nor a benefit the plaintiffs sought in bringing their action holding that the party prevailing on the significant issues in the litigation is the party that should be considered the prevailing party for attorneys fees