Officer Sparks, Warden Everett also subjected him to cruel and unusual punishment. We agree with the district court that Mr. Tennyson’s Eighth Amendment claims are indisputably and legally meritless. “Prison officials are required to insure that inmates receive adequate food, clothing, shelter and medical care.” Shannon v. Graves, 257 F.3d 1164, 1168 (10th Cir.2001). To state an Eighth Amendment claim, an inmate must allege prison conditions that are, objectively, “sufficiently serious so as to deprive inmates of the minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities” or conditions that “constitute a substantial risk of serious harm.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). In Shannon, for example, we held that a prisoner’s allegations of exposure to fecal-contaminated blankets and 93) (<HOLDING>). Infringement of a prisoner’s right to
holding that denial of outofcell exercise for an extended period violates the eighth amendment holding 612 week denial sufficient to satisfy the objective component of an eighth amendment violation holding the eighth amendment inapplicable to an award of exemplary damages holding that plaintiff failed to state a  1983 claim based on the eighth amendment when he refused to be treated medically in the presence of corrections officers on the grounds that he was not entitled to receive medical treatment in complete privacy holding eighth amendment claim based on denial of right to eat a kosher meal in a particular location was legally frivolous