While this legal principle may not apply to the state-controlled electoral process in precisely the same way that it applies to the citizen-led initiative process, it retains its essential character even in areas in which broad state authority exists. League of Women Voters v. Cobb, 447 F.Supp.2d 1314, 1334-1339 (S.D.Fla.2006) (relying on Meyer to invalidate a Florida statute imposing burdens on third parties participating in the voter-registration process without imposing similar burdens on political parties participating in the same process). Pennsylvania’s extensive authority to regulate the voter-registration process does not remove the Plaintiffs’ canvassing activities from the ambit of First Amendment protection. Project Vote v. Blackwell, 455 F.Supp.2d 694, 700 (N.D.Ohio 2006) (<HOLDING>). The regulatory authority of Pennsylvania “is
holding that the video games at issue are expressive and qualify as speech for purposes of the first amendment holding that owners of bar with nude dancers did not state a  1983 claim based on first amendment rights where they failed to allege interruption of business or expressive activities despite monetary losses holding that raising chickens is not an expressive act for the purposes of the first amendment holding that the first amendment protects the right to criticize a grand jury investigation recognizing that the first amendment protects the expressive activities associated with the voterregistration process