officers served a search warrant at the East Clay residence. They seized marijuana plants, an Uzi submachine gun, and a loaded shotgun. The police also discovered fertilizer, irrigation equipment, heat lamps, and gardening tools. The search warrant was based upon the sworn affidavit of a Fresno Police Department detective, who in turn relied upon the observations of an animal control officer with no documented expertise in marijuana identification. Long filed a motion to suppress, arguing that (1) the search warrant failed to establish probable cause; (2) he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in East Clay; and (3) the government is estopped from arguing that he did not because it stated during a bail hearing that Long resided at East Clay. The government responded t 9th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Photographs and clothing alone are
holding that the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in a telephone booth holding that defendants personal items and sworn declaration and police officers testimony that the defendant had stayed in a house the night before are insufficient to establish defendants expectation of privacy holding that defendant staying in abandoned house had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the house despite having a key to the house and the ability to let people in and out of it holding that defendants had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the common areas of an apartment building recognizing record supported determination that defendant lacked expectation of privacy in house