must consider: (1) whether the government “intended to design d the streets outside are open to scathing criticism of what happens within the courthouse. But the halls of justice may be kept hushed.”). This is because: the function of a courthouse and its courtrooms is principally to facilitate the smooth operation of a government’s judicial functions....[T]he presiding judge is charged with the responsibility of maintaining proper,order and decorum. In carrying out this responsibility, the judge must ensure that the courthouse is a place in which rational reflection and disinterested judgment will not be disrupted.... Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53, 91 (2d Cir.2005) (internal citations omitted); see also Sammartano v. First Judicial Dist. Court, 303 F.3d 959, 966 (9th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Berner v. Delahanty, 129 F.3d 20, 26 (1st
holding that judicial and municipal complexes are nonpublic forums holding that the interiors of polling places are nonpublic forums holding that notice statute applies to both municipal entities and employees of municipal entities acting within the scope of their employment holding that although municipalities are persons within the meaning of 42 usc  1983 no municipal liability lies under that statute unless action pursuant to official municipal policy of some nature caused a constitutional tort holding that discrimination against a municipal employee could trigger municipal liability under  1983 through official policy or custom