and regulations and establish such service as will insure the objects of such reservations, namely to regulate their occupancy and use and to preserve the forests ... and any violation of ... such rules and regulations shall be punished by a fine ... or imprisonment. Courts have held that § 551 confers broad federal jurisdiction over activities that affect the national forests. See, e.g., United States v. Arbo, 691 F.2d 862 (9th Cir.1982) (Section 551 confers federal jurisdiction over interference with the federal inspection of a mining claim adjacent to a national forest); United States v. Lindsey, 595 F.2d 5 (9th Cir.1979) (Section 551 confers federal jurisdiction over campers on river bed adjacent to a national forest); see also United States v. Craner, 652 F.2d 23 (9th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>). Raffield seeks to escape the language of §
recognizing that a suit by the national government against a state does no violence to the inherent nature of sovereignty recognizing that the federal government may prosecute drunk drivers in national parks pursuant to a statute similar to  55116 usc  3 recognizing that stateimposed restrictions upon property may be attributed to the federal government for purposes of a takings analysis where the state officials acted as agents of the federal government or pursuant to federal authority recognizing similar duties holding that a party may prosecute a claim which arose prior to the appointment of the receiver but may not then execute upon the judgment