at Buffalo Sch. of Med. & Biomedical Scis., 804 F.3d 178, 189 (2d Cir. 2015). Specifically, a reasonable “acco ural impediments and nontrivial temporal delays that limit access to programs, services, and activities. See Celeste v. E. Meadow Union Free Sch. Dist., 373 Fed.Appx. 85, 88 (2d Cir. 2010) (finding sufficient evidence for a jury to conclude that a mobility-impaired student was denied meaningful access because he was “forced [ ] to take a ten minute detour” in order to participate as the manager of his school’s football team). An accommodation is not plainly reasonable if it is so inadequate that it deters the plaintiff from attempting to access the services otherwise available to him. See Disabled in Action v. Bd of Elections in City of N.Y., 752 F.3d 189, 200 (2d Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>). In short, providing meaningful access
holding that potential loss of a contract constitutes irreparable injury holding that under the ada discovery of the original act of discrimination not future confirmation of the injury or determination that the injury is unlawful is when the statute of limitations begins to run holding that the virginia disabilities act constitutes the most analogous state statute of limitations for claims brought under the ada recognizing that deterrence constitutes an injury under the ada quoting kreisler v second ave diner corp 731 f3d 184 188 2d cir 2013 holding that constructive possession may be established by a showing that the firearm was seized at the defendants residence emphasis added quoting united states v walls 225 f3d 858 867 7th cir 2000