to the supreme court, which transferred the case to this court pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 12-2-7(6). A motion for summary judgment is to be granted when no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c)(3), Ala. R. Civ. P. See West v. Founders Life Assurance Co. of Florida, 547 So.2d 870 (Ala.1989), and Bass v. SouthTrust Bank of Baldwin County, 538 So.2d 794 (Ala.1989), for a discussion of the application of the “substantial evidence rule” in the summary-judgment context. Elaty and Guiee contend that the mortgage company’s foreclosure extinguished the second mortgage and the bond for title. Cameron argues that that foreclosure did not extinguish his remedies for breach provided in t 84, 253 So.2d 511 (1971) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, in this case, once the mortgage
holding that foreclosure of a prior mortgage extinguished a declaration of condominium and interests in a parking lot that were subject to the mortgage holding that foreclosure of prior mortgage extinguished second mortgage holding that the note and the mortgage must coexist to give the mortgage validity holding that a mortgage or modification of a mortgage is not a good or a service under the dtpa holding that despite foreclosure judgment providing that the holder of a junior mortgage had no interest in or lien on or claim to said premises the lack of foreclosure sale meant that the junior mortgage was not extinguished