could not have been meant to refer to Risk Management, which was not created until 1981. However, when Risk Management was created, the Legislature gave it powers and responsibilities that suggest it can readily fit within the term "agency concerned" for purposes of section 63-30-12. See Utah Code Ann. §§ 63A-4-101 to -206 (1993) (defining powers and duties of Risk Management). See also Utah Ádmin.Code R37-1-1 to -5 (1994) (administrative rules establishing policies and procedures of Risk Management). We should assume that when the Legislature created Risk Management it did so advisedly, fully aware of the impact this would have on existing law. See Greenhalgh v. Payson City, 530 P.2d 799, 801 (Utah 1975). See also Adkins v. Division of State Lands, 719 P.2d 524, 525-26 (Utah 1986) (<HOLDING>). 4 . See, e.g., Utah Code Ann. § 63-30-11(1)
holding that the damages and jury trial provisions of the 1991 act apply to conduct occurring prior to the date of enactment holding that federal land policy and management act mandate to preserve wilderness and manage public lands in accordance with land use plans was not tantamount to a specific statutory command requiring agency action and thus not actionable under  7061 recognizing that in the absence of a statutory definition statutory terms are construed in accordance with their ordinary or natural meaning holding plaintiff need not file notice in accordance with section 633012 because division of state lands had statutory authority to decide dispute prior to the creation and enactment of the governmental immunity act holding that as a general rule interlocutory trial court orders rejecting defenses of common law sovereign immunity governmental immunity public official immunity statutory immunity or any other type of immunity are not appealable under the maryland collateral order doctrine