is a handicap. Am. Motors Corp. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 119 Wis.2d 706, 710, 350 N.W.2d 120 (Wis. 1984). This fact is a question of law that may be met by establishing that he has a real or perceived impairment. Id. Wisconsin law defines an impairment as “a real or perceived lessening or deterioration or damage to a normal bodily function or bodily condition, or the absence of such bodily function or such bodily condition.” La Crosse Police & Fire Comm’n v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 139 Wis.2d 740, 761, 407 N.W.2d 510 (Wis.1987). Again, even when viewed in the most favorable light, Anders’s few experiences with his panic disorder do not indicate such a condition. See, e.g., Doepke-Kline v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm’n, 287 Wis.2d 337, 704 N.W.2d 605, 610-11 (2005) (<HOLDING>). C. Family and Medical Leave Act Having
holding that a change in employer from one federal contractor to another caused employees no lack of work holding that your work exclusion is triggered only where the damage at issue is to work performed by you and is caused by work performed by you  and does not apply to damage caused to original construction of a house during later repair work holding that claimant failed to show that he was terminated solely because of handicap holding on rehearing that exclusion for disabilities caused by a preexisting medical condition would not support denial of benefits caused by staph infection resulting from surgery for a preexisting condition holding ongoing asthma condition that caused repeated absences from work was not a handicap