inability of these males to give the full name of the owner of the home, and probability that the initial person in blue who fled was a lookout, clearly gave rise to probable cause in the eyes of trained police officers and exigent circumstances. The inability to contact anyone in the home heightened the concern. In addition, there is case law that deals with similar situations to the case at bar, which we believe buttresses our holding that the entry by the officers into the premises is supported by probable cause and exigent circumstances as a matter of law. Because the officers reasonably believed under the circumstances that a burglary was in progress, we find that probable cause and exigent circumstances existed. See, e.g., Reardon v. Wroan, 811 F.2d 1025, 1029 (7th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Singer, 687 F.2d 1135, 1144
holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where it seemed apparent that a burglary was in progress holding that 911 call reporting domestic dispute and child telling officer that a man with a gun was inside fighting with her mom constituted exigent circumstances that justified warrantless entry into home holding that officers warrantless entry to locate and abate loud music late at night was justified by exigent circumstances holding that exigent circumstances justified warrantless entry where officers were faced with a call reporting burglary in progress