Aff. ¶¶ 23, 24. See also PL’s Depo. at 178 (Ex. F to Document No. 39).) To be sure, Plaintiff cites no law stating that sleeping, writing, using a truck driver’s license, or sex are “major life activities,” but Defendants raise no argument to the contrary. Accordingly, the court will assume that at least some of these activities are “major life activities” under the ADA and chapter 151B. See Arrieta-Colon v. Wal-Mart P.R., Inc., 434 F.3d 75, 88 (1st Cir.2006) (“Under Bragdon v. Abbott, 524 U.S. 624, [638-39], 118 S.Ct. 2196, 141 L.Ed.2d 540 (1998), ‘reproduction is a major life activity for the purposes of the ADA’ and ‘reproduction and the sexual dynamics surrounding it are central to the life process itself.’ ”); Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 355 F.3d 6, 21 (1st Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Farrington v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 2003 WL
recognizing that to establish a disability a plaintiff must prove a substantial limit with specific evidence that his particular impairment substantially limits his particular major life activity recognizing sleeping as major life activity holding that a lifting restriction of ten pounds did not constitute a physical impairment that substantially limited a major life activity holding that breathing is a major life activity within the contemplation of the ada holding that reproduction is not a major life activity