may be left at the scene if they are legally parked. If the vehicle is to be left on private property, permission should be obtained from the property’s owner or manager. c. Prisoner-Requested Tow. The vehicle may be towed at the prisoner’s expense. Houston Police DepaRtment, General Order no. 600-10, § 7 (Nov. 19, 1999). The first two alternatives are also required by common law. See, e.g., Stephen v. State, 677 S.W.2d 42, 44 n. 1 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (stating the police should respect a prisoner’s wish to leave his car with a companion who had a valid driver’s license); Josey v. State, 981 S.W.2d 831, 842-13 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, pet. ref'd) (examining the availability of both options); Smith v. State, 759 S.W.2d 163, 167 (Tex.App-Houston [14th Dist.] 1988, pet. refd) (<HOLDING>). Appellant was thus entitled to either of them
holding that the prisoner should have been allowed to choose whether to leave his car parked in a public parking lot holding that defendant was seized where defendant was intent on getting into waiting car to leave bus terminal parking lot and thus retention of his drivers license prevented him from going about his business holding that an injury occurring in a parking lot which was leased but not controlled by an employer was compensable because the employer instructed its employees to park in that lot holding that injury in a parking lot did not occur on a covered situs holding that the presence requirement of the carjacking statute was satisfied when keys were taken from a bank employee whose car was parked in a parking lot outside the bank