Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the plead ings is granted.” This docket entry is incorrect as stated. The court’s opinion and order actually denied Plaintiff (Appellant’s) motion and granted Defendant (Appellee's) cross-motion for judgment on the pleadings. The docket entiy should be amended to reflect the court's decision. 2 . Not every transfer of property will trigger a valid right of first refusal. See Lehn’s Court Management LLC, supra (adopting four-part test for purposes of determining whether right of first refusal is triggered in a property transfer; holding transfer of property from landlord to corporation of which landlord was sole shareholder did not constitute “sale” that triggered tenant’s right of first refusal); Mericle v. Wolf, 386 Pa.Super. 82, 562 A.2d 364 (1989) (<HOLDING>). 3 . Pennsylvania law states that appellate
holding sale of property by county taxing authority to pay delinquent taxes did not trigger right of first refusal provision contained in deed holding gratuitous transfer of real property to hospital did not trigger right of first refusal holding transfer restriction granted right of first refusal in event of voluntary or involuntary transfer of stock holding right of first refusal only applied to a voluntary sale and taking of property by condemnation is involuntary therefore right of first refusal not triggered holding united states marshals involuntary bankruptcy sale of property did not trigger right of first refusal