CURIAM. Appellant challenges the lower court’s order removing a court-ordered lien on his inmate trust account but denying his request for reimbursement of funds used from the account to pay court costs and fines. The State properly concedes error. See Wilcox v. State, 79 So.3d 878, 878-79 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012) (<HOLDING>); Araujo-Espichan v. State, 62 So.3d 683, 684
holding that no private right of action exists holding that an attorneys right to payment from a fund created through his efforts has priority over the states rights to statutory setoffs for inmate costs holding that trustees fiduciary duty exists independent of any clause in trust agreement holding that no statutory basis exists to impose lien on inmate trust account for court costs and fines holding that no distinction exists between investigatory costs and onsite cleanup costs for purposes of recovery