his credibility. See Biao Yang v. Gonzales, 496 F.3d 268, 273 (2d Cir. 2007) (“An applicant’s failure to corroborate his or her testimony may bear on credibility, because the absence of corroboration in general makes an applicant unable to rehabilitate testimony that has already been called into question.”). Kola failed to provide evidence that his car was bombed despite asserting that he had reported the bombing to authorities and had evidence of it. Also, Kola failed to provide a statement from his brother, who allegedly suffered the same persecution Kola did. And, the IJ reasonably gave limited weight to a letter from Kola’s father because it was from an interested witness not subject to cross-examination. See Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 471 F.3d 315, 342 (2d Cir. 2006) (<HOLDING>); Y.C. v. Holder, 741 F.3d 324, 334 (2d Cir.
holding that the weight afforded to the applicants evidence in immigration proceedings lies largely within the discretion of the agency holding that the weight afforded to documentary evidence  lies largely within the discretion of the ij holding that weight afforded to applicants evidence in immigration proceedings lies largely within agency discretion holding that the weight afforded to the evidence lies largely within the agencys discretion holding that the weight accorded to evidence lies largely within the discretion of the agency