ADA, Section 504, or the Constitution, they must first be exhausted in state administrative proceedings.” M.T.V., 446 F.3d at 1158. This is so because IDEA’S philosophy “ ‘is that plaintiffs are required to utilize the elaborate administrative scheme established by the IDEA before resorting to the courts to challenge the actions of the local school authorities.’ ” Id. (quoting N.B. ex rel. D.G. v. Alachua County Sch. Bd., 84 F.3d 1376, 1378 (11th Cir.1996) (per curiam)). Therefore, Plaintiffs must “exhaust the IDEA’S administrative procedures to obtain relief that is available under the IDEA before bringing suit under Section 504 and/or the ADA.” Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Babicz v. Sch. Bd. of Broward County, 135 F.3d 1420, 1421-22 (11th Cir.1998) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). They may not “avoid the exhaustion
holding plaintiffs had stated a claim for intentional discrimination under the ada and  504 holding that exhaustion is not required for plaintiffs seeking money damages because damages are unavailable through the administrative process and because all other relief available to the plaintiffs under the idea had already been provided through a settlement agreement holding that bivens plaintiff was not required to exhaust administrative remedies where administrative remedy program provided only for injunctive relief holding that where plaintiffs asserted claims under section 504 and the ada seeking compensatory damages and injunctive relief due to schools alleged failure to accommodate plaintiffs chronic asthma plaintiffs were required to exhaust ideas administrative procedures to obtain relief available under idea holding that damages are not relief that is available under the idea