to the Superior Court’s decision as a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, because that is how the Superior Court characterized the dismissal, this Court’s restatement of the Superior Court’s characterization should not be construed as an agreement with the Superior Court that the thirty-day deadline for filing a Petition for Writ of Review under Superior Court Rule 15(a) is a jurisdictional requirement. See Gov’t of the V.I. v. Crooke, Civ. No. 2007-0109, 2010 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 28, at *42 (V.I. Aug. 24, 2010) (explaining that jurisdictional status of the thirty-day requirement is unclear because, although Rule 15(a) is a claims processing rule, it is incorporated by reference in the general writ of review statute passed by the legislature); Bryan v. Ponce, 51 V.I. 239, 250 (V.I. 2009) (<HOLDING>). 3 Wilbert Williams, MD v. Government of the
holding that section 890041 is not a jurisdictional requirement rather a requirement to maintain suit holding that certificate of merit is a mandatory but nonjurisdictional filing requirement holding that this time requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional holding rule 15as attorneys certificate requirement is not jurisdictional recognizing that issue exhaustion is a mandatory although not jurisdictional requirement