value to each parcel); United Nat’l Corp. v. Cty. of Hennepin, No. 1482, 1983 WL 1026 (Minn.-T.C. Apr. 21, 1983) (valuing three parcels comprising a shopping center as a single unit). These cases stand for the unremarkable proposition that tax parcels may be combined for property tax purposes. None of these cases address whether the unit-rule method is properly applied to value a collection of contiguous and non-contiguous parcels that stretches across multiple taxing districts in four counties. 15 . We acknowledge that such a parcel-by-parcel determination in the case of 4,680 parcels may be tedious, but that is a determination required by the Legislature, not by this court. See, e.g., Under the Rainbow Child Care Ctr., Inc. v. Cty. of Goodhue, 741 N.W.2d 880, 890 (Minn.2007) (<HOLDING>). We also observe that Blandin had the right to
recognizing that tax policy choices are appropriately left to the political branches recognizing that when other branches of government are remiss in their constitutional duties the judiciary must act holding that claim premised on the organizing arming and disciplining of members of the national guard involved issue committed expressly to the political branches of government recognizing that standing doctrine is fundamentally rooted in respect for the separation of powers of the independent branches of government holding that persecution was on account of political opinion because petitioners prosecutorial investigation into acts of political corruption was by its very nature political