that the challenged action is essentially legislative in nature rather than quasi-judicial, such that it should not be subject to administrative review. As the preceding analysis suggests, we reject this characterization. Although the approval of a settlement agreement is superficially at issue, Petitioner’s challenge is directed at the underlying decision to permit the proposed development to proceed. Both the minutes of the February 27, 2002, City Council meeting and the settlement agreement clearly reflect that a development decision pertaining to the Sam’s Club property was made. Such site-specific development determinations are properly classified as quasi-judicial in nature. See W. Old Town Neighborhood Ass’n v. City of Albuquerque, 1996-NMCA-107, ¶ 11, 122 N.M. 495, 927 P.2d 529 (<HOLDING>). The fact that the City’s quasi-judicial
recognizing that the zoning code of a homerule city is a legislative enactment recognizing legislative or quasilegislative nature of design decision holding that a zoning decision pertaining to a specific property is not a legislative act but is rather quasijudicial in nature holding that to the extent that the securing of information is necessary to a prosecutors decision to initiate a criminal prosecution it is encompassed within the protected quasijudicial immunity afforded to the decision itself recognizing that zoning and rezoning are legislative matters