representation benefits the child, our community, and the courts, and exemplifies the ideals of service in our profession. By advocating the child's point of view, Ms. Vigil not only contributed an important viewpoint to aid the court’s deliberation, but also enabled the child to feel that her voice was heard, considered, and respected as part of the judicial process. The child's perception that she was treated with good faith is important, our Supreme Court has noted, because "a child who feels that he or she has been treated fairly in the course of the commitment proceedings will likely be more willing to accept hospitalization and treatment.” Amendment to the Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.350, 804 So.2d 1206, 1211 (Fla.2001). 2 . See, e.g., Polites, 904 So.2d at 532 (<HOLDING>); Hairison, 896 So.2d at 870 (holding the trial
holding that hiring of only two mental health experts was not deficient holding the trial court correctly ordered appellant to pay restitution for the full value of the vehicle holding that it is plain error for a trial court to require a defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees in the absence of legally sufficient evidence that defendant has the ability to pay the amount imposed holding the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the office of the state attorney to pay for the costs of mental health experts evaluating the defendant holding the trial court violated the separation of powers doctrine when it ordered the department of corrections to pay for a convicted sex offenders treatment program