his neighbors to show that the officers’ surveillance was unfocused and inexact is unpersuasive. Korber testified at the suppression hearing that he could not get too close to the trailer, and he only saw the vehicle that he initially stopped as it left the trailer park. But after the erroneous stop, he asked for additional officers to assist. Both Hood .and Garrison actually saw defendant and Pelón leave the trailer, and Hood saw them drive away in the Ranger. Under the totality of the circumstances, there was sufficient justification for Garrison, acting under Korber’s instructions, to stop the Ranger. See id. at 965-66 (upholding stop of vehicle where officers reasonably suspected person of criminal activity and believed he was in the vehicle); see also Chavez, 534 F.3d at 1344-48 (<HOLDING>). In short, the district court did not err in
holding that officer was objectively justified in making traffic stop where he acted on the strength of other officers information of drugtrafficking by passenger holding an officer may order a passenger to get out of a car during a traffic stop and may frisk a passenger for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects the passenger is armed and dangerous holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop holding that an officer may order a passenger out of a vehicle during a stop for a traffic infraction holding that an officers mistaken belief that the defendant was speeding was not an objectively reasonable purpose for a traffic stop