fact as to whether Haim and Alexandra lived together on the date of the hurricane, and the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. b. Post-Loss Obligations The Citizens policy at issue requires the named insured and 9, 332 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (citing with approval Marlin Diagnostics and holding that “the assignment of a contract right does not entail the transfer of any duty to the as-signee, unless the assignee assents to assume the duty”). Citizens was entitled to an EUO from Alexandra, its named insured, regardless of the Assignment. Alexandra’s refusal to submit to a requested EUO precludes recovery under the policy, because the EUO stands as a condition precedent to coverage. De Ferrari v. Gov’t Emps. Ins. Co., 613 So.2d 101 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Goldman, 660 So.2d at 304 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, it was error for the trial court
holding policy provision requiring an insured to submit to an examination under oath is a condition precedent to suit rather than a cooperation clause holding the failure of the insureds to submit to an euo a condition precedent to sustaining a suit on the insurance policy required abatement of the suit holding that clean water acts notice provision is a condition precedent to all claims holding that when fulfillment of contractual condition precedent is a precondition to access to the arbitral forum it is error to submit claims to arbitrator holding that rcras notice provision is a condition precedent to all claims