Cir.1997) (“Just as the Court in Wilson found ordering a passenger out of the car to be a minimal intrusion on personal liberty, we find the imposition of having to remain in the car with raised hands equally minimal.”)- And although, as a general matter, an occupant is seized within the meaning of the seizure, when officers apprehended him after his flight, he had already abandoned the revolver and marijuana. United States v. Harrison, 689 F.3d 301, 307 (3d Cir.2012) (“In most eases, disclaiming ownership or physically relinquishing the property is sufficient to establish abandonment.”). And because Richardson abandoned the revolver and marijuana before the officers seized him, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in those items. See Hodari D., 499 U.S. at 629, 111 S.Ct. 1547 (<HOLDING>); cf. United States v. Fulani, 368 F.3d 351,
holding that the defendants motion for discharge was premature and thus properly denied by the trial court holding that cocaine abandoned by defendant whilst fleeing from police was not fruit of seizure and motion to exclude evidence of it was properly denied holding that where defendant denied knowledge of the cocaine in his bag it was not error to allow testimony of its street and wholesale value holding that defendant abandoned his motion by failing to pursue it within a reasonable time after it was filed holding rule 80bd motion was properly denied because petitioner was not entitled to relief as a matter of law