that if a defendant was previously deported after conviction for a simple felony, his base offense level should be increased by 4 points. 4 . When our Kennedy-Jordan line of cases was decided, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 provided only for conditions under which the district court could correct a sentence it imposed in an illegal manner. The successor to that provision appears today in Rule 35(c), which provides for correction of sentences by the sentencing court. Rule 35(a), on the other hand, governs correction of sentences determined on appeal to have been imposed unlawfully. As our discussion will illustrate, the Kennedy-Jordan line of cases is currently relevant only to resen-tencing pursuant to Rule 35(c). See United States v. Portin, 20 F.3d 1028, 1030 (9th Cir. 1994) (<HOLDING>). All references to Rule 35 in this opinion
holding that modification of original sentence occurred outside the sevenday window and the district court lacked jurisdiction to act pursuant to rule 35c holding that outside of rule 35 there exists no inherent authority for a district court to modify a sentence holding that even if the district court lacked jurisdiction to correct a defendants sentence under fedrcrimp 35c  3583e2 authorized the court to modify the conditions of a defendants supervised release holding that timely filing of rule 35c predecessor to rule 35a  motion renders otherwise final order of district court nonfinal until disposition of that motion holding that rule 35c like the preguidelines versions of rule 35 interpreted by our kennedyjordan line of cases authorizes the district court only to correct its sentencing errors