the circuit court ordered Presidio to reinstate Mr. Taylor’s health insurance policy retroactively without giving Presidio notice or an opportunity to be heard. This complete denial of due process to Presidio in connection with the underlying proceedings constitutes the type of irreparable harm that is subject to certiorari review. See K.G. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 66 So.3d 366, 368 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (observing that if a mother’s allegation that she was denied an opportunity to be heard on a shelter peti tion was true, the resulting harm would be irreparable unless immediately addressed; otherwise “the entire proceeding [would be] based on a denial of her due process rights”); see also A.G. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Families, 65 So.3d 1180, 1182 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, because Presidio is not a party to
holding that to declare a denial of due process we must find a denial of fundamental fairness holding that review by common law certiorari in district courts of appeal is limited to circuit court decisions constituting denial of procedural due process application of incorrect law or miscarriage of justice holding that the denial of due process in a particular case is subject to harmless error analysis holding that the denial of counsel to a father at a shelter hearing constituted a denial of due process renewable by certiorari holding that a denial of due process warrants mandamus relief