judge.” Germain v. State, 363 Md. 511, 522-23, 769 A.2d 931 (2001) (citing Black's Law Dictionary 1184 (6th ed.1990)). 2 . A ruling on a motion to enforce a plea agreement is a collateral order, and therefore, immediately appealable. See Rios v. State, 186 Md.App. 354, 364-66, 974 A.2d 366 (2009). 3 . Falero’s question is: Did the Circuit Court err when it ordered the binding plea agreement vacated? 4 . See Maryland State Commission on Criminal Sentencing Policy, Maryland Sentencing Guidelines Manual, ch. 12.1, at 42 (April 2005), http://www.msccsp.org/Files/Guidelines/manual_05.pdf. 5 . Indeed, some courts have held that appearance at sentencing is an implicit term whether or not it is communicated to the defendant. See United States v. David, 58 F.3d 113, 115 (4th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Berg v. State, 131 Idaho 517, 960
holding that where a furlough and an enhanced sentence for failure to appear in court at a later time are part of the plea agreement a court is justified in imposing the enhanced sentence after the defendant fails to appear in court without giving him an opportunity to withdrawhis plea holding that objecting to guidelines calculations as specifically reserved in the plea agreement is not a breach of the plea agreement even if the objection is overruled and thus government is not released from obligation under the agreement to move for acceptance of responsibility holding that no constitutional violation occurred where state prosecutor did not allow defendant to withdraw guilty plea and reinstated additional charges after defendant violated plea agreement by failing to testify truthfully at codefendants trial holding that by jumping bail and failing to appear the defendant violated the plea agreement and the governments obligation to move for a downward departure based on substantial assistance ended holding that the governments representations to the court that it was not seeking an upward departure suggested it had not breached the plea agreement