informed Austin-Spearman that it allows third parties to collect member PII ... she either (i) would not have paid for an AARP membership in the first place or (ii) would not have used the AARP website at all[.]”).) But conclusory statements regarding a plaintiffs own beliefs and expectations are not sufficient to support an alleged “overpayment” injury; rather, a plaintiff must allege facts that demonstrate that the breached term was objectively essential to the contract at issue, such that the violation effectively robbed the plaintiff of her payment because what she received was not what the parties agreed she had purchased. In other words, a plaintiff is not entitled to demand perfect realization of every hope and dream with respect to contract performance 319-21 (5th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). The analysis and holding of In re Science
holding that the plaintiff did not establish a waiver where the defendants answer had put the plaintiff on notice of an arbitration defense holding so where the plaintiff alleged that the defendant had colluded to claim falsely that the plaintiffs physician had informed the claims adjuster that the plaintiff had been released to work and where the plaintiff was later discharged from employment and denied workers compensation benefits holding that plaintiff was entitled to sue under rule 10b5 for the difference between the price and the value received from the sale of the security where as here the evil is not the price at which plaintiff bought but the fact of being induced to buy holding that the plaintiff was not denied the benefit of the bargain and therefore lacked standing where plaintiff had bought a prescription painkiller that was later withdrawn from the market but plaintiff found the painkiller to be effective and did notsuffer harmful side effects holding that the plaintiff was denied the benefit of the bargain and therefore had standing where plaintiff did not receive the full number of agreedupon minutes he purchased in a wireless cellular phone service agreement