suit are Riverside Healthcare System, LLC ("RHCS”), a limited partnership doing business as Riverside under California law, and Columbia/HCA Western Group, Inc., a Tennessee corporation with an ownership interest in RHCS. Hereinafter, all three entities will be referred to collectively as “Riverside.” 2 . In Strother, we acknowledged that California courts have allowed parties who were “not 'clients, patrons, or customers,' in the traditional sense” to bring claims under § 51. Id. at 873. Nevertheless, we determined that the plaintiffs in each of these cases stood in a position with the defendant similar to that of a customer in the “customer-proprietor relationship” the Unruh Act was designed to protect. Id. at 873-74 (citing O’Connor, 33 Cal.3d at 796, 191 Cal.Rptr. 320, 662 P.2d 427 (<HOLDING>); Isbister v. Boys’ Club of Santa Cruz, Inc.,
holding that debtor whose plan of reorganization had been confirmed by bankruptcy court could not later bring lender liability claims against creditors where those claims could have been raised in bankruptcy proceeding holding unconscionable under california law employment contract compelling arbitration of claims employee most likely to bring against employer but not claims employer most likely to bring against employee and requiring first 125 of arbitration fees to be paid by employee holding that debtors have no right to jury trial on malpractice claims against their attorneys holding that condominium owners could bring  51 claims against their condominium owners association holding that female children excluded from membership in the boys club could bring claims against the organization