determine whether the relevant policy provisions ar 06 F.2d 196, 199 (5th Cir.1990) (same, applying Texas law). Therefore, we interpret them according to their plain and ordinary meaning. 2. East Central’s claim is excluded by the amendatory endorsement. Under Part 1(A) of the CGL Policy, the injuries and death of the Creek County Well Service employees constitute “bodily injuries.” East Central’s claim against Creek County Well Service is based on Creek County Well Service’s obligation under the Six-Foot Rule to indemnify East Central for over $4,000,000 for East Central’s liability to Creek County Well Service’s employees and their families as a result of the employees’ bodily injuries. See East Central Elec. Coop. v. Robert Gordon Equip., Inc., 772 F.2d 662, 663-64 (10th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the amendato-ry endorsement excluding
holding that the immunity afforded an employer under the workers compensation act ohastat tit 85  12 does not shield it from liability to a power company for a loss paid by the employer because of a violation of the sixfoot rule okla stat tit 63  981 holding that when an employee is injured by his employers tortious conduct his employer owes him damages and compensation under the act holding that unless that power is restricted by the principal an agent under a california statutory healthcare power of attorney has the power to execute applicable admission forms including arbitration agreements holding that an officers observations of a vehicle weaving between the center line and the shoulder line four to five times over a distance of approximately five miles created reasonable suspicion that the driver was under the influence holding that under oklastat tit 63  984 the power line company can recover from the employer of an employee injured by the power line the percentage of the employers negligence as determined by a jury