and control over the property to the detriment of the rights of its actual owner.” Envases Venezolanos, S.A. v. Collazo, 559 So.2d 651, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)(quoting Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1986)) (citations omitted). In the instant case, Humana alleged that it mistakenly wired funds into Heritage Southeast’s California bank account and that Heritage Southeast and Merkin improperly retained it. Therefore, although the funds were wired from Florida, the exercise of wrongful dominion and control over the property to the detriment of its actual owner occurred in California where the funds were received and improperly retained. E.J. Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Southeast First Nat’l Bank of Miami, 415 So.2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)(<HOLDING>); Envases Venezolanos, 559 So.2d at 652-53
holding a bank officer who informed a third party that it would be safe to extend 8000 credit to bank customer although customer did not have an open account at the bank could be held liable for the material misrepresentation holding that bank had right to set off funds in a customers account against debt that the bank customer had incurred as a surety or guarantor holding that causes of action for money had and received and conversion arose in orlando when miami bank mistakenly wired funds to companys bank account in orlando holding successor national bank liable for punitive damages judgment against bank that merged into successor national bank holding that a bank customer did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in records maintained by the bank