(reversing conviction of tax crimes and remanding for new trial). 16 . The Court is not finding that the program operates as asserted, but only that such a program is presented to members. 17 . Presumably, its membership or a class of members. 18 . Kotmair’s role in the nuptials is not specified. 19 . For decisions holding that an unincorporated association cannot own property, see Krumbine v. Lebanon County Tax Claim Bureau, 541 Pa. 384, 663 A.2d 158, 160 (1995) (real property); Rock Creek Gardens Tenants Assoc. v. A.M. & L.A. Ferguson, 404 A.2d 972 (D.C.App.1979) (per curium) (real property); United States v. Thevis, 474 F.Supp. 134, 138 (N.D.Ga.1979); Libby v. Perry, 311 A.2d 527, 531-32 (Me.1973). But See Loving Saviour Church v. United States, 556 F.Supp. 688, 690 (D.S.D.1983) (<HOLDING>). 20 . Compare, Motta v. Samuel Weiser, Inc.,
holding sba is an integral part of federal government and is not a separate legal entity holding that an unincorporated association is a legal entity and therefore can own property holding that an evicted plaintiff has no legal interest in property and therefore has no standing to bring a cercla claim holding that property of a public entity includes having exclusive control and possession of  property holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver