at one time and place. Vance, Green, and Canion involved only one illegal act. Section 775.021(4), Florida Statutes, permits conviction and sentence for separate criminal offenses committed within one criminal transaction: (4)(a) Whoever, in the course of one criminal transaction or episode, commits an act or acts which constitute one or more separate criminal offenses, upon conviction and adjudication of guilt, shall be sentenced separately for each criminal offense.... (b) The intent of the Legislature is to convict and sentence for each criminal offense committed in the course of one criminal episode or transaction and not to allow the principle of lenity as set forth in subsection (1) to determine legislative intent. See also Nicholson v. State, 757 So.2d 1227 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (<HOLDING>). Here, the multiple convictions were based on
holding that the defendants acquiescence to a mistrial constituted implicit consent precluding a later claim of double jeopardy recognizing the specific need for an appropriate double jeopardy review when an appeal is taken by the state from a lower courts dismissal of the criminal charges holding that defendant waived double jeopardy claim by obtaining severance of charges at first trial holding the double jeopardy clause applicable to the states through the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment recognizing that there is no double jeopardy bar precluding separate charges where the defendant threw a brick through the rear sliding door of a house followed immediately by his throwing a brick through a front window