“or other ... materials” must refer to something other than an inanimate object, at least in the context of the obscenity chapter. Third, the uniformity provision in section 728.11 is a strong indication of the general assembly’s desire to establish statewide regulation of obscenity. The placement of section 728.5, which pertains to live performances in the obscenity chapter, is indicative of the general assembly’s intent to include its regulation of live performances in this statewide scheme. See In re Det. of Garren, 620 N.W.2d 275, 280 (Iowa 2000) (“The legislature’s intent to enact a civil statute is also implied from the placement of the [Sexually Violent Predator Act] among code chapters dealing with the mentally ill....”); State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 616 N.W.2d 575, 579 (Iowa 2000) (<HOLDING>); see also NLRB v. Federbush Co., 121 F.2d 954,
holding where the statutory minimum sentence exceeds the guidelines sentence a substantialassistance downward departure begins at the mandatory minimum sentence holding that a sentence below a statutory minimum based on the filing of a substantial assistance motion did not eliminate the otherwise applicable mandatory minimum for purposes of sentence modification under  3582c2 holding that even where the evidence is uncontroverted to sentence a defendant to a minimum mandatory sentence for trafficking the jury must make express findings of the amount of cocaine involved holding that a sentence was based on a mandatory statutory minimum sentence even though it was lowered under another statute holding the placement of a statute mandating a minimum sentence for certain felonies in the chapter governing felonies rather than the chapter governing sentence reduction indicated a legislative intent to operate as a minimum sentence for felons and not a restriction on the power of a parole board