City of Thornton, 817 P.2d 514, 518 (Colo.1991) (in providing that a "dangerous condition shall not exist solely because the design of any facility is inadequate," § 24-10-108(1), the General Assembly did not intend to distinguish between designs that are "inadequate" initially and designs that become "inadequate" over a period of time); Lyons v. City of Aurora, 987 P.2d 900, 902 (Colo.App.1999) (by amending definition of dangerous condition in 1992 to provide that "maintenance does not include any duty to upgrade, modernize, modify, or improve the design or construction of a facility" General Assembly intended "to preclude liability when a governmental entity fails to modify a facility because of changing safety standards or use") (citing Swieckowski); see also Karr, 677 P.2d at 1386 (<HOLDING>); Jaffe v. City & County of Denver, 15 P.3d
holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver holding that land dedicated for a public street may not be leased to a private entity for private use holding that the public entity was not required to modify or improve intersection based on changing use holding that the crucial distinction that rendered the public entity liable for a private actors inaccessibility was that the public entity had contracted with the private actor for it to provide aid benefits or services to beneficiaries of the public entitys redevelopment program holding that the use of a corset spring device was public although the use was by its nature not visible to the general public