652, (Tex.App.Waco 1993, writ denied); see also Ex parte Threet, 160 Tex. 482, 333 S.W.2d 361, 364 (1960) (evidence that couple was introduced as husband and wife to a few friends was no evidence that they held themselves out as married). Whether the evidence is sufficient to establish that a couple held themselves out as husband and wife turns on whether the couple had a reputation in the community for being married. Eris, 39 S.W.3d at 715; see also Danna v. Danna, No. 05-05-00472-CV, 2006 WL 785621, at ⅜1 (Tex.App.-Dallas Mar. 29, 2006, no pet.) (mem. op.) (a “couple’s reputation in the community as being married is a significant factor in determining the holding[-]out element”), quoted in Smith v. Deneve, 285 S.W.3d 904, 910 (Tex.App.Dallas 2009, no pet.); Giessel, 734 S.W.2d at 31 (<HOLDING>). Proving a reputation for being married
holding that police did not enjoy qualified immunity for a period where they acknowledged that plaintiff had to be released but nevertheless kept him handcuffed holding that couple held themselves out as married when they had reputation in community for being married even though they had kept marriage secret from a few family members holding that the defendants statement in an application for citizenship that he had only been married once was false even if the second marriage had been a nullity because it was bigamous holding victims statements to coworkers admissible to rebut defendants claim that they had a good marriage holding that samesex partners who would  have chosen to marry before a childs birth had they been permitted to are entitled to a statutory presumption of parentage that otherwise conferred benefits only upon a married spouse