2-401); McCarthy v. Imported Cars of Md., Inc. (In re Johnson), 230 B.R. 466, 468 (Bankr.D.D.C.1999) (“The passage of title cannot ... be delayed until after shipment or delivery of the goods to the buyer. After shipment or delivery, any retention of title by the seller results only in the reservation of a security interest.”); Associated Indus. v. Keystone Gen., Inc., 135 B.R. 275, 279 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1991) (“While the Uniform Commercial Code does permit the parties some power by allowing the parties to agree as to when title will transfer, the Code and the case-law place a limitation on this power. In short, if the seller attempts to retain title after delivery or until paid in full, all the seller gets is a security interest.”); In re Phillips, 77 B.R. 648, 650 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1987) (<HOLDING>); Seitz v. Stecklein, 111 Idaho 364, 723 P.2d
holding that the retention of title pursuant to a repurchase agreement limits the seller to the reservation of a security interest under ucc  2401 holding that after delivery under a sale agreement even if the parties intended that title would not pass until the other documents were completed and signed   retention of title would only have given the creditor a security interest holding that delivery of possession of vehicle without delivery of certificate of title did not transfer ownership even though full payment had been received holding that even if an agreement that title would pass once financing was obtained the most a creditor could claim was a security interest once the good was delivered holding that the junior mortgagee had no right title or interest in the real estate after the sale was confirmed in the purchaser who became title owner