objections. Finally, Howard argues—again only very generally—that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to object when the State’s prosecutor employed leading questions during the direct examination of the State’s witnesses, including the victims. Putting aside the fact that Howard fails to specifically identify the objectionable leading questions on appeal, he never questioned his trial counsel during the hearing on his motion for new trial about the alleged failure to object to these nondescript questions. And in the absence of evidence to the contrary, “counsel’s decisions are presumed to be strategic and thus insufficient to support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.” Indeed, the decision not to object to leading questions is “ (669 SE2d 400) (2008) (<HOLDING>). 14 Jones v. State, 272 Ga. 900, 901 (2) (537
holding that against her will in the rape statute means without her consent and that the fact that the victim was under the age of consent was sufficient to establish that element holding that evidence was insufficient where the victim testified that she was awake and communicated her desire not to have sexual intercourse with the defendant holding evidence insufficient to support kidnapping in four rapes in which 1 attacker held knife to victim and forced her into car where he raped her 2 assailants forced their way into victims home walked victim through dining room into kitchen put dish towel over her face and raped her 3 attackers forced way into victims apartment one pulled out gun took victim to couch for oral sex then took her into adjoining bathroom raped her and threatened to rip out phone and 4 assailants forced their way into victims apartment at gunpoint put hand over victims mouth walked her toward kitchen and then to bedroom checking first to see if anyone was present and then raped her holding that the applicant was entitled to asylum based on her fear that her daughter will be forced to undergo female genital mutilation because her fear of  being forced to witness the pain and suffering of her daughter is wellfounded holding that evidence the defendant brandished a knife moved victim under a desk in her office forced her to have sexual intercourse there and scratched her hip while doing so supported defendants aggravatedassault kidnappingwithbodilyinjury and rape convictions