Riccobene, 709 F.2d at 223-24). Thus, the court held in the case before it that this requirement had been met where the associates “coordinated the commission of multiple predicate offense, ... and continued to provide legitimate services during the period in which they were engaged in racketeering activities.” Id. at 652. In Atlas Pile Driving, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held that an association in fact may include corporations, citing prior decisions from other circuits. Atlas Pile Driving, 886 F.2d at 995 n. 7 (citing United States v. Perholtz, 842 F.2d 343, 353 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 821, 109 S.Ct. 65, 102 L.Ed.2d 42 (1988)); see also United States v. Feldman, 853 F.2d 648, 655 (9th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1030, 109 S.Ct. 1164, 103 L.Ed.2d 222 (1989) (<HOLDING>); Console, 13 F.3d at 652 (association in fact
holding that while a state statute granted a foreign corporation the rights and privileges enjoyed by domestic corporations it did not transform such corporations into domestic or resident corporations recognizing a cause of action against a corporations directors brought by a creditor for the fraudulent misrepresentation of the corporations financial condition holding that a corporations principal place of business for determining diversity jurisdiction under 28 usc  1332c1 is the nerve center meaning the corporations headquarters or the place where a corporations officers direct control and coordinate the corporations activities recognizing a similar exception to its rule with respect to corporations holding that a rico enterprise may consist of individuals associated in fact with corporations