herein by reference in accordance with Pa.R.C.P. 1019(g); which Rule relieves [plaintiff] from its obligations to attach documents to pleadings if those documents are of public record.” (Comp, para. 3.) The complaint thus supplied its own unassailable interpretation of the rule it invoked, which provides, in pertinent part, A party may incorporate by reference [in a pleading] any matter of record in any State or Federal court of record whose records are within the county in which the action is pending, or any matter which is recorded or transcribed verbatim in the office of the prothonotary, clerk of any court of record, recorder of deeds [,] or register of wills of such county. Pa.R.C.P. 1019(g); cf. US Bank v. Mallory, 982 A.2d 986, 992-94 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2009) (Stevens, J.) (<HOLDING>). In response to the specific pleading in
holding plaintiff did not have standing to challenge the validity of an assignment from mers to bac because she was not a party to the assignment and the assignment did not affect her underlying obligation to make timely payments holding court could consider a mortgage agreement not attached to the complaint in ruling on motion to dismiss because the complaint refers to the mortgage numerous times the mortgage is attached to this motion and is central to plaintiffs claims holding assignment of a mortgage was not subject to article 9 holding parcp 1019 and parcp 1147 did not require that a preformalized assignment of a mortgage be recorded or attached to the complaint and assignee did not have to have recorded assignment to have standing to seek enforcement of mortgage in foreclosure action holding article 9 inapplicable to an assignment of a mortgage on real estate