the SFIC policy, in the present case, provided separate contracts of insurance since it spoke in terms of separately scheduled buildings. The schedule of property values, which was included in the SFIC insurance policy, made the coverage specific, not blanket. Since each building was separately listed on the declarations page, with a separate covered amount and separate premiums listed for each building, each of these seven separate claims should have its own statutory cap of $300,000. The majority of the cases relied on by FIGA are distinguishable because these cases address insurance policy liability coverage for wrongful death and derivative tort claims, rather than first party property damage claims. See Allstate Ins. Co. v. Clohessy, 32 F.Supp.2d 1333, 1337 (M.D.Fla.1998) (<HOLDING>); Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass’n, Inc. v. Cole, 573
holding that florida courts have uniformly held that loss of consortium and wrongful death survivor actions are subject to the perperson limit of liability holding that widow had individual action for loss of her husbands consortium between onset of his illness and death separate from that available under wrongful death statute recognizing loss of consortium claims recognizing cause of action for loss of consortium recognizing that loss of consortium is a right of action separate from that of the spouse