truck with large tires coming from the direction of the bank and occupied by two white males. These facts provided Officer Mueller with a reasonable and articulable suspicion that the occupants of the truck were engaged in criminal activity, and justified his decision to stop the truck, remove Bourque and Crissman from the truck, and inspect the truck for other suspects or weapons. See Maryland v. Wilson, 519 U.S. 408, 415, 117 S.Ct. 882, 137 L.Ed.2d 41 (1997) (no Fourth Amendment violation in requiring defendant to exit car to be frisked); Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032, 1049, 103 S.Ct. 3469, 77 L.Ed.2d 1201 (1983) (no Fourth Amendment violation for searching car’s passenger compartment where a gun may have been secreted); United States v. Holmes, 376 F.3d 270, 280 (4th Cir.2004), (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 633, 160
holding a stop was effected where officers vehicle blocked defendants vehicle from proceeding holding that the search of purses could not be justified as a protective search for weapons when police had control of the purses holding automobile exeeption did not apply to warrantless search of vehicle where vehicle was not readily mobile because the vehicle was legally parked in parking lot occupants of vehicle were seated on a bench in the playground near the parking lot police officers surrounded the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle was handcuffed for safety purposes holding that after making an arrest of the driver of a vehicle the police may search the passenger compartment of the vehicle holding that long authorizes protective search of vehicle for weapons during terry stop even when suspect is outside vehicle and effectively under police control