prior convictions not fatal to warrant if affidavit read with that information deleted "nonetheless demonstrates that 'the issuing magistrate had a substantial basis for concluding that there were enough facts within the affidavit to find that probable cause existed' " (citation omitted)). T8 The issue before this court is whether, reading the affidavit with the information about Vest's arrest and Defendant's prior criminal history deleted, there were enough facts to find that probable cause existed. See State v. Dable, 2003 UT App 389,¶ 8, 81 P.3d 783 (concluding that arrest of the defendant in Wyoming for possession of methamphetamine, without more, failed to establish probable cause that drugs were located in her home in Utah); State v. Brooks, 849 P.2d 640, 644 (Utah Ct.App.1993) (<HOLDING>). T9 Application of the Jackson holding to the
holding that the arrest of the defendant two years prior to the warrant did nothing to establish that he was now dealing in controlled substances from his home holding that defendants ability to pay may be considered in assessing penalty under controlled substances act holding that an arrest warrant  without a search warrant  does not permit law enforcement authorities to enter a third partys home to legally search for the subject of the arrest warrant holding  1227a2bi limits the meaning of controlled substance for removal purposes to the substances controlled under  802 holding there was enough evidence to find the defendant abandoned his child when he claimed to have knowledge of cpss involvement he admitted that for periods of two years and six months he did not attempt any contact with his child and from the date he canceled a home study until the petition was filed he did not attempt to contact the child or cps or provide support even when he was out of jail