docket sheets, which provide an index to the records of judicial proceedings. In Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980), and its progeny, the Supreme Court recognized that the First Amendment grants both the public and the pr 1070 (3d Cir.1984) (determining that “the First Amendment embraces a right of access to [civil] trials”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Numerous federal and state courts have also extended the First Amendment protection provided by Richmond Newspapers to particular types of judicial documents, determining that the First Amendment itself, as well as the common law, secures the public’s capacity to inspect such records. See, e.g., In re Providence Journal Co., 293 F.3d 1, 10-13 (1st Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. United States
holding that the district of rhode islands blanket policy of refusing to file memoranda of law that counsel were required to submit in connection with motions violated the first amendment holding that some federal connection to the misconduct is required holding that it was not clearly established in 2002 that forcing a prisoner to sleep without a mattress but with a bed and a blanket violated the eighth amendment holding that the countys permit fee violated the first amendment holding no first amendment right to file frivolous grievances