also Newman v. Boehm, Pearlstein & Bright, Ltd., 119 F.3d 477, 481 (7th Cir.1997) (“By paying the purchase price and accepting title to their home, the Riters became bound by the Declaration of-Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions of their homeowners association, which'required the-payment of regular and special assessments imposed by the association.”); Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. Anderson, 12 Cal.4th 345, 363, 47 Cal.Rptr.2d 898, 906 P.2d 1314, 1325 (1995) (explaining that “if the restrictions, are recorded before the sale, the later purchaser is deemed to agree to them. The purchase of property knowing of the restrictions evinces the buyer’s intent to accept them burdens and benefits,”); Johnston v. Michigan Consol. Gas Co., 337 Mich. 572, 579, 60 N.W.2d 464, 468 (1953) (<HOLDING>); Warrender v. Gull Harbor Yacht Club, Inc.,
holding that promissory estoppel existed when the grantor agreed to use the property for only residential purposes took title with knowledge of that promise and the grantee relied upon that agreement recognizing that the acceptance by the grantee of a deed poll signed and sealed by the grantor containing covenants to be performed by the grantee binds the latter to the performance of these covenants as effectually as if he had executed the instrument quotations and citation omitted holding that deed was valid when the deed was conveyed to grantee corporation which formally incorporated after the conveyance holding when a deed provides grantee would take subject to the state of facts which a personal inspection or accurate survey would disclose grantee has no claim against grantor for power line easement holding that where grantee was named as trustee without identification of the beneficiaries or the nature and purposes of the trust and no trust agreement of record was identified the grantee received fee simple title