array of fact patterns”). 4 . Although the actual statistics are not in the record as to the voter or total population of Coosa County during the relevant time period, this court notes that the U.S. Bureau of Census provides that in 1980 the total population of Coosa County was 11,377. See Fed. R.Evid. 201; Knox v. Butler, 884 F.2d 849, 852 n. 7 (5th Cir.1989) (observing that court may take judicial notice of census statistics on federal habeas review). 5 . The state court clerk's index recites that the trial court's order is on page 1142. The pages in the court's file, however, are not numbered. 6 . The Supreme Court of the United States has found presumed prejudice based on pretrial publicity in the following three cases: Sheppard, above; Rideau, 373 U.S. at 724, 83 S.Ct. 1417 (<HOLDING>); Estes v. Texas, 381 U.S. 532, 535-36, 85
holding that in determining whether a substantial change of circumstances has occurred trial court must consider income available to parents new marital community holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to continue trial three months where although trial was complex and records were voluminous court had already granted two prior continuances and continuance of three weeks was sufficient to prepare for trial holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by refusing to accept the defendants guilty pleas to two counts of the indictment and stating that even if the trial court erred the error had not prejudiced the defendant because he was found guilty by the jury of the charges to which he intended to plead and the evidence of the other crimes would have been admissible in the trial for the first degree murder charge holding that although the court disapproved of the prosecutors appeal to tell the defendant that this crime wont be tolerated in this community the remark was not so objectionable as to conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to grant a mistrial holding that the defendants uncounselled 20minute custodial confession which was televised three times prior to the trial in the community where the crime and trial occurred was so pervasive and inflammatory as to saturate the community such that any subsequent court proceeding would be but a hollow formality