Stat. § 7B-llll(a)(2) and A.C.F. are satisfied. This assignment of error is overruled. IV: Hearsay In his next argument, respondent contends that the trial court erred by overruling his objections to the admission of the DSS file, testimony with respect to the contents of the file, and other tes timony that constituted inadmissible hearsay. We disagree. Even assuming arguendo that the records contain inadmissible hearsay, respondent has failed to demonstrate that the trial court’s order must be reversed. Respondent does not demonstrate prejudice in his argument on appeal, which is necessary for this Court to reverse the trial court’s order. See In re T.M., 180 N.C. App. 539, 548, 638 S.E.2d 236, 241-42 (2006) (citing In re M.G.T.-B., 177 N.C. App. 771, 775, 629 S.E.2d 916, 919 (2006) (<HOLDING>). Here, respondent makes a general claim that
holding that even when the trial court commits error in allowing the admission of hearsay statements one must show that such error was prejudicial in order to warrant reversal holding improper admission of hearsay evidence is reversible error only when the admission causes prejudice holding that even if evidence admitted in error admission must result in material prejudice to warrant reversal holding that even if there is error in failing to award nominal damages to a plaintiff such error is not a basis for reversal holding to warrant reversal the appellant must show both the error of the ruling and resulting prejudice