may invite speculation as to whether the undisclosed evidence would have affected the outcome of the case, such speculation does not affect the ultimate question, that of the materiality of such evidence, and it certainly does not affect the duty that the State has to discharge the obligation imposed upon it by Brady. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS. 1 . Maryland Rule 4-263(g) provides: "(g) Obligations of State's Attorney. The obligations of the State’s Attorney under this Rule extend to material and information in the possession or control of the State’s Attorney and staff members and any others who have participated in the investigation or evaluation of the action and who either regularly report, or with reference to the particular action h 635 (2002) (<HOLDING>). 5 . We note that the original quote from Daye
holding regarding sixth amendment prejudice if there is no reasonable possibility that the appellate court would have ruled in his favor there can be no strickland prejudice holding that there was no prejudice when evidence complained of would have been admissible against defendant in separate trial holding that there is no sixth amendment right to jury sentencing holding that in defining the reasonable probability language in strickland with more precision substantial possibility describes the prejudice standard in strickland holding that an error is harmless if there is no reasonable possibility that it contributed to the conviction