created reports to document the examinations given. She said, “Any interaction that we have with a patient in the course of our daily, daily part of seeing patients, we .have to make a record of that communication and contact and what we did with that patient.” Because of the nature of the examination, the reports.are stored in a separate file, but the reports are nonetheless part of Erlan-ger’s medical records. The report is not automatically disseminated to law enforcement or the district attorney’s office; those entities must request a release to obtain the reports. Dr. Garcia’s testimony clearly reflects that the statements made by the victims were intended for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment. This is consistent with Tennessee jurisprudence. Cannon, 254 S.W.3d at 303 (<HOLDING>); State v. Stinnett, 958 S.W.2d 329, 332-33
holding that statements in medical records given for the primary purpose of medical diagnosis and treatment are nontestimonial holding a victims statements to emergency room doctor not testimonial where the purpose of the examination was for medical diagnosis and treatment holding that the term medical as used in the hearsay exception regarding statements made for the purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment includes emotional and mental health as well as physical health holding that there was insufficient evidence that alleged victim made statements to forensic nurseexaminer for purpose of medical diagnosis or treatment in part because there was no evidence regarding alleged victims past experience with medical facilities or medical providers holding that federal rule of evidence 8034 the hearsay exception for statements made for medical diagnosis or treatment does not apply to statements made by doctors