person against whom an order of denial has been entered is entitled to operate a motor vehicle, he must reapply for a new license at the end of the period of denial, pay the restoration fee required ..., file proof of financial responsibility ... and must be in receipt and possession of the new license. Unless and until these conditions are satisfied, his driving status as “denied” continues and he is subject to prosecution ... for driving under denial. Since the defendant did not take these steps after the termination of the three month period of denial had expired, he was properly convicted by the county court of driving under denial. 629 P.2d at 580 (emphasis supplied and citations omitted); accord Colorado Dep’t of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Div’n v. Brakhage, 735 P.2d 195 (Colo.1987) (<HOLDING>). Like the court in Lessar, we cannot conclude
recognizing that production of a written insurance policy was unnecessary to prove the existence of the policy because the proof required was proof of the fact of insurance and not of the contents of a writing holding statement of points in notice of appeal sufficient holding that police chiefs suspension letter omitting statutorily required information about process for appeal of suspension did not deprive hearing examiner of jurisdiction over suspended officers appeal and require reinstatement of officer holding that threemonth suspension for exceeding the statutorily permissible number of points would continue until individual complied with statutory requirements of paying restoration fee and providing proof of insurance holding that plaintiff complied with plain language of the notice requirement when notice was mailed within statutory period although it was not received until after