351 F.Supp.2d 213, 217 (S.D.N.Y. 2005). As Defendants point out, and Plaintiffs do not dispute, Plaintiffs are still able to obtain a gun license to own a shotgun or a rifle as a good guy letter is not necessary for the purchase and possession of those firearms. Without the good guy letter, Plaintiffs are simply prevented from possessing and carrying a pistol, not all firearms. Since “there is no allegation that Defendants’ actions have affected Plaintiffs’] ability to retain or acquire other firearms ... the conduct alleged in the [First] Amended Complaint does not amount to a Second Amendment violation.” Vaher v. Town of Orangetown, 916 F.Supp.2d 404, 430 (S.D.N.Y. 2013); see also McGuire v. Village of Tarrytown, No. 08 Civ. 2049, 2011WL 2623466, at *7 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2011) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to dismiss
holding that plaintiff state employees contract right to be discharged only for cause was not protected by due process clause because it did not rise to level of fundamental right holding that because defendants did not prevent plaintiff from acquiring another weapon they did not impede plaintiffs right to bear arms holding that individual defendants were not liable under the elcra because they did not have the authority to rehire the plaintiff holding that plaintiffs did not have standing because they did not sue the party with the clear ability to act holding that neglect was not excusable where the defendants did not do all that they were required to do after they received the summons and complaint in that they did not contact a lawyer or make any other arrangements with respect to their defense