a plausible claim for relief, the claim survives the motion to dismiss. Id. at 1950. B. Whether Dismissal is Appropriate as to Kennedy’s Second Claim For Wrongful Discharge ■ Riverstone asserts that no wrongful discharge claim may lie where the statute on which the claim is premised provides a remedy for wrongful discharge. River-stone argues that because the ADA and the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (“CADA”) provide a full measure of remedies, Kennedy may not bring a wrongful discrimination claim based on either statute. Riverstone directs me to a line of cases holding that under Colorado law no wrongful discharge claim may lie where the statute on which the claim is premised provides a remedy. Gamble v. Levitz Furniture Co. of the Midwest, Inc., 759 P.2d 761, 766 (Colo.App.1988) (<HOLDING>); Caspar v. Lucent Techs., Inc., 280 F.Supp.2d
recognizing tort of wrongful discharge in violation of public policy holding a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy is not available where the employee has an existing statutory remedy holding that public policy claims are unavailable where the statute in question provides the employee with a wrongful discharge remedy recognizing that hawaii law does not allow parnar claims where the public policy at issue is contained in a statute  that provides a remedy for violations of that policy holding that where statutory or regulatory provisions which evidence the public policy themselves provide a remedy for the wrongful discharge provision of a further remedy under the public policy exception is unnecessary