including designing the duct work layout and specifications as to the number, location, type and tonnage of the chiller units and coil sizes. Id. at 515. ONG then hired a company to supply and install the units. Id. The system did not work properly from the start, and major modifications failed to correct the problem. Id. at 516. The plaintiffs sued ONG, seeking recovery on theories of negligence, fraud and misrepresentation, breach of contract, and the Oklahoma Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The court allowed negligence claims to be pursued against ONG; however, the court specifically found that ONG “did undertake to design an air-conditioning system for plaintiffs’,” and in so doing, “incurred legal responsibility for ‘injury occasioned ... by [its] want of ordina 102715 (D.N.J.1992) (<HOLDING>); Accusystems, Inc. v. Honeywell Information
recognizing that pennsylvania had no interest in denying its residents the greater damages available under new jersey consumer fraud statutes for claims against a new jersey seller recognizing israel had no interest in denying its citizens the substantive advantages of new jersey defamation law in new jersey residents claims for defamation published in new jersey holding purposeful and deliberate omission on enactment of new jersey sales and use tax of exemption found in new york counterpart act which served as the model for new jersey act holding that new jersey courts would bar tort suits for negligent misrepresentations inducing the formation of contracts between commercial parties recognizing new jerseys interest in deterrence of tortious misconduct as a relevant factor in choice of law decisions applicable where two of defendants were new jersey residents from whom damages were sought for their negligent acts in new jersey