than that they be given such a trial. Its impairment, ipso facto, brings the court, and administrative bodies as well, into public disrepute, and destroys the esteem and confidence which they have enjoyed so generally. Time and experience have demonstrated that the public, as well as litigants, will tolerate the honest mistakes of those who pass judgment, but not the biased acts of those who would deprive litigants of a fair and impartial trial. Foremost among the responsibilities imposed upon a reviewing court, is to make sure that this foundation of our Judicial system be not undermined. Fallon, 441 P.2d 822, 329 (citing Inland Steel Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 109 F.2d 9, 20 (7th Cir.1940)). Devous, 845 P.2d at 417. See also, Painter v. Abels, 998 P.2d 931, 938 (Wyo.2000) (<HOLDING>). [142] In Ririe we discussed the statutory and
holding djue process requires that an agency provide a fair trial without the appearance of bias or prejudice holding that prejudice requires that the difference in sentencing be significant holding that an assertion of prejudice is not a showing of prejudice holding that a petitioner must show prejudice in order to prevail on a claim that he or she was denied a full and fair hearing in violation of due process holding that an indigent defendant cannot have a fair trial without being provided counsel