13-7-4(a) and (b). We base this conclusion on the plain language of the statute. Section 13-7-4 first defines “public nuisance” and then delineates the means by which such a public nuisance may be enjoined. Specifically, an individual may seek attorney general intervention under subsections 13-7-4(a) or (b) or initiate a civil suit under subsection 13-7-4(c). A court may award expenses under subsection 13-7-4(d) only when a covered entity “is determined or found not to be in violation of this act.” Utah Code Ann. § 13 — 7—4(d). Because a covered entity may be found innocent of an alleged violation in any of the enumerated types of claims, subsection 13-7-4(d) logically applies to all three of the remedial measures. See Clover v. Snowbird Ski Resort, 808 P.2d 1037, 1045 (Utah 1991) (<HOLDING>). In addition, the terms of subsection
holding that a contract will be read as a whole and the intent of each part will be gathered from a consideration of the whole recognizing that a statute should be read as comprehensive whole holding that limitations from the specification should not be read into the claims holding that when interpreting a statute or regulation courts must read the provisions of the law as a whole and in context holding that related provisions should be read together