the parties ten days to finalize their agreement and reduce it to writing and sign it to express their mutual consent.” Id. As evidence, the plaintiff introduces the following statement made by the Administrative Judge during the hearing: At the end of the reading the parties will verbally give their agreement and the actual agreement will be typed and signed and forwarded to the parties and to this administrative judge by Mr. Campagna [defense attorney] within ten days. Id. (emphasis supplied by plaintiff). The plaintiff argues that the words “actual agreement ... will be forwarded ... within ten days” implies that the parties had not reached a final settlement agreement on the day of the hearing. The plaintiff’s inference, however, is not reasonable. See Brown, 848 F.2d at 1540 n. 12 (<HOLDING>). The plaintiff quotes the sentence out of
holding that effect must be given if possible to every clause and word of a statute holding that the nonmovant need not be given the benefit of every inference but only of every reasonable inference recognizing that to uphold the government contentions would require the court to pile inference upon inference holding that a reasonable inference need not be the sole possible inference recognizing that a vital fact may not be established by piling inference upon inference