[sic] TDC — motion to stack.” Later that same day, appellant changed his mind and decided that he wished to accept the State’s plea-bargain offer. Appellant contacted his attorney, who visited him in jail. When appellant’s attorney told appellant that the 15-year plea-bargain offer was no longer available, appellant said that he would plead guilty to 20 years in prison. The State, however, refused to offer 20 years in prison, offering instead only a plea bargain of 40 years in prison, to run concurrently. Appellant pleaded guilty to both offenses on December 2, 2002, without an agreed recommendation from the State, and received conc l may or may not have a direct nexus with a defendant’s plea of guilty. Martinez v. State, 109 S.W.3d 800, 803 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2003, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>). A judgment of guilt is rendered independently
holding that plea did not waive claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to seek suppression recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel holding that right to appeal claim of ineffective assistance of counsel alleging that counsel failed to convey plea negotiations timely and adequately inform of consequences of pleading guilty to jury for sentencing waived because plea of guilty to jury was independent of and not supported by alleged ineffective assistance of counsel claims holding that the appropriate vehicle for claims alleging that defense counsel violated a defendants right to testify is a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate