appellant as one of the individuals shooting at the victims and he admitted he fired at the surviving victims. When we consider the legal sufficiency of the evidence, we leave to the jury questions regarding witness credibility. See Young v. State, 297 Ga. 737, 738 (1) (778 SE2d 162) (2015). 2. Appellant contends his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance on multiple grounds, none of which were asserted by him in his amended motion for new trial filed after he obtained new counsel. Nor were the grounds he now seeks to assert raised at the hearing on his amended motion for new trial. Accordingly, these enumerations of error have not been preserved for appeal because they were not raised at the earliest practicable moment. See Jones v. State, 294 Ga. 501, 503 (755 SE2d 131) (2014) (<HOLDING>). 3. Appellant also asserts that appellate
holding that defendant waived ineffective assistance claim based on trial counsels failure to emphasize certain evidence where amended motion for new trial did not assert claim of ineffectiveness on that ground and no argument related to the asserted ground was made at the motion for new trial hearing holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal recognizing that the defendant whose trial counsel represented him on motion for new trial had no opportunity to raise an ineffective assistance of counsel claim prior to appeal and remanding the case for a hearing solely on this issue holding that the trial court may not grant summary judgment on a ground not raised in the motion holding that a defendant whose new trial motion is based on the alleged ineffectiveness of trial counsel may bypass rule 33s sevenday time limit only if his claim that his counsel  was ineffective was based on information unavailable to the defendant at the time of trial