by the water judge on the question of injury to the vested rights of others for such period after entry of such decision as is necessary or desirable to preclude or remedy such injury. Such condition setting forth the period allowed for reconsideration shall be determined by the water judge after making specific findings and conclusions including, when applicable, the historic use to which water rights involved were put, if any, and the proposed future use of the water rights involved. The water judge shall specify his determination as to such period in his decision, but the period may be extended upon further decision by the water judge that the nonoceur-rence of injury shall not have been conclusively established. § 37-92-304(6); see Farmers Res. & Irr. Co., 33 P.3d at 805 (<HOLDING>); Clear Creek Water Users Alliance, 859 P.2d at
holding that fort collinss nature dam which diverted water from the poudre river into its historic channel past a nature center removes  water from its natural course and puts that water to a beneficial use holding that the water courts factual determinations other than its injury findings become final and appealable upon entry of the decree and may not be reconsidered under retained jurisdiction holding that a water courts historic use determinations may not be reviewed under the retained jurisdiction provision holding that credibility determinations are reviewed only for substantial evidence holding that article x  2 of the california constitution dictates the basic principles defining water rights that no one can have a protectible interest in the unreasonable use of water and that holders of water rights must use water reasonably and beneficially