Other cases involving material breach before the Court of Claims also turned upon whether a material breach excused performance. See e.g., Southeastern Airways Corp. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 47, 673 F.2d 368 (1982) (explaining Government rightfully terminated contract for contractor’s material breach because contractor failed to show Government caused breach); Arlington Alliance, Ltd. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 347, 685 F.2d 1353 (1982) (finding contract applying the material breach doctrine. See, e.g., Christopher Vill., L.P. v. United States, 360 F.3d 1319, 1337 (Fed.Cir.2004) (finding contractor’s fraudulent conduct, as a prior material breach, rightfully was used as defense to Government’s subsequent breach ); Dow Chem. Co. v. United States, 226 F.3d 1334, 1346 (Fed.Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Alliant Techsystems, Inc. v. United States,
recognizing validity of retroactive license that memorialized grant of oral license holding that the verification of mishlers medical license was part of the protected property interest in the license and reversing the district courts dismissal of his complaint holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license holding motorist entitled to hearing before taking his license under statute that required loss of license if uninsured driver involved in an accident