from National Penn Bank. Appellee claims that Appellants are not entitled to the proceeds from the avoidance but are only entitled to the equity in the residence, which Appellee claims is zero because the two mortgages totaled more than the estimated value of the property. Appellee contends that Appellants are attempting to recover from the avoidance he obtained from National Penn Bank. We have previously held that a debtor is not entitled to benefit from any avoidance. In re Cybergenics Corp., 226 F.3d 237, 244-47 (3d Cir.2000) (noting that courts have limited a debtor’s exercise of avoidance powers to circumstances in which such actions would in fact benefit the creditors, not the debtors themselves); see, e.g., Wellman v. Wellman (In re Wellman), 933 F.2d 215, 218 (4th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). However, a debtor may benefit from an
holding that an employer is only allowed to be reimbursed from a tort recovery to the extent that the recovery duplicates the elements of damage covered by compensation benefits holding that recovery is limited to the portion of the medicaid recipients thirdparty recovery representing compensation for past medical expenses holding that the avoidance powers provide for recovery only if the recovery is for the benefit of the estate holding that the irs has notice of plaintiffs alternate ground of recovery because it had considered and evaluated the applicability of the code provision under which the plaintiff sought recovery holding that it is wellsettled that although a plaintiff is entitled to full recovery for its damages it is not entitled to a double recovery for the same loss or injury