Orion Logistics to submit to a supplemental examination. ¶ 81. For the reasons stated above, I dissent. ¶ 82. I am authorized to state that Justices ANN WALSH BRADLEY and N. PATRICK CROOKS join this opinion. 1 Wis. Stat. § 816.03(l)(a) ("When an execution against property has . . . been returned unsatisfied ... the court. . . shall, upon motion of the judgment creditor, order such judgment debtor, whether an individual, firm, corporation or other association, to appear before the court or judge and answer concerning the judgment debtor's property ...."). 2 Courtyard Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Draper, 2001 WI App 115, ¶ 9, 244 Wis. 2d 153, 629 N.W.2d 38. 3 See ¶ 54, supra. 4 See ¶ 77, infra. 5 Cf. Heritage Farms, Inc. v. Market Ins. Co., 2012 WI 26, ¶ 37, 339 Wis. 2d 125, 810 N.W.2d 465 (<HOLDING>). regarding assets which ought to be subjected
holding that ijnjuries caused by the condition of a public entitys property  clearly refers to ownership of a property interest which allows a public entity to control the property holding that although allegations were not specific as to what property was damaged they could be fairly read to include property covered by the insurance policy recognizing that the word may in wis stat  26211 allows but does not require property owners whose property is damaged by forest fires to bring a civil action to recover double damages holding that an action for consequential damages to property whether the action is brought in contract or in tort is an action for injury to property within the threeyear statute of limitations holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property