F.3d 562, 569 (5th Cir. 1995) (quotation marks and citations omitted). 109 . In re Bass, 171 E.3d 1016, 1022 (5th Cir. 1999); Firefighters' Ret. Sys., 541 B.R. at 351. 110 . Celotex Corp., 514 U.S. at 308, 115 S.Ct. 1493. 111 . Manguno v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co., 276 F.3d 720, 723 (5th Cir. 2002). 112 . Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc., 200 F.3d 335, 339 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Willy v. Coastal Corp., 855 F.2d 1160, 1164 (5th Cir. 1988)). 113 . See 28 U.S.C. § 1452 (providing that an order remanding a claim or cause of action related to bankruptcy cases "is not reviewable by appeal”); 28 U.S.C. § 1447 ("An order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise”). See also Browning v. Navarro, 743 F.2d 1069, 1078 (5th Cir. 1984) (<HOLDING>). 114 . Rec. Doc. 16-1 at 1-2. 115 . Rec. Doc.
holding that federal district courts lack jurisdiction to review a final state court decision in a particular case holding that the district court did not have jurisdiction and remanding the matter to state court holding that bankruptcy court has discretion to retain jurisdiction over related case after dismissal of the underlying bankruptcy case holding that rule 11 sanctions imposed by district court remained in effect after case was remanded to state court upon a finding that district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case holding that it is axiomatic that remanding a case to state court terminates the jurisdiction of a federal bankruptcy or district court over that case