to recovery up to the full amount of their unreimbursed losses prior to Geico being reimbursed for any amounts previously paid to said insureds.” See Third Amended Complaint at p. 7. She is also requesting damages in conjunction with the declaratory judgment in the form of unreimbursed losses owed to insureds plus prejudgment interest. Id. It is clear that the declaratory relief sought by Powers is equivalent to a request for a declaration of liability. The declaratory judgment count serves the ultimate goal of monetary restitution and is designed primarily to facilitate and ensure the satisfaction of monetary relief. Therefore, class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) is inappropriate. See In re Jackson National Life Insurance Company Premium Litigation, 183 F.R.D. 217 (W.D.Mich.1998) (<HOLDING>); Goldberg v. Winston & Morrone, 1997 WL 139526
holding prayer for general relief does not support award of commonlaw prejudgment interest as element of damages holding because the district court refused to grant plaintiff reinstatement or any other injunctive relief the damage award was neither incidental to nor intertwined with any other relief holding that a court may award injunctive relief against a state officer holding prayer for general relief does not support award of attorneys fees holding that a request for injunctive relief was merely incidental to a prayer for damages where it was designed to facilitate and ensure the satisfaction of any monetary relief the court might award