So.2d at 1244; see also § 856.021(2). M.R. attempted to hide behind a dumpster when Officer Quintero first approached in his marked K-9 vehicle. When Officer Quintero approached on foot, M.R. then attempted to flee the scene and started to quickly walk away from the complex. Although “alarm is presumed when a person flees, conceals himself, or refuses to identify himself,” the officers’ testimony at the adjudicatory hearing articulated specific facts that warranted the finding that there was an imminent concern to the public and surrounding property. B.J., 951 So.2d at 102. Officer Quintero testified that after approaching M.R. in his marked K-9 vehicle, he got out and loudly yelled verbal instructions to M.R. to return to the immediate area. M.R.’s delayed compliance la. Bd DCA 2002) (<HOLDING>); Grant, 854 So.2d at 242 (holding that
holding that opening the door in response to a police demand and then failing to object when officers entered was not voluntary consent holding that the second element was not satisfied where the defendant shined a flashlight into a glass door for five to ten seconds then left the area and was stopped by police officer thirteen blocks away recognizing that trial court properly left the door open for defendant to prove its defenses to the fed complaint holding that no seizure occurred where the defendant initially stopped in compliance with a police officers order but then drove off quickly before the police officer could reach the suspects car holding that the defendant committed assault under section 70813 where he came into the apartment for about two seconds with a gun in his right hand held the gun straight down at his side said wrong door then closed the door and started knocking on the other apartments door