Plan, thus satisfying subsection (a)(10), provided the other requirements of § 1129(b) are met. SASCO has stated it will not vote in favor of the Plan. II. Separate Classification of Claims Classification of claims or interests, as relevant to this case, is covered in § 1122(a), which states: Except as provided in subsection (b) of this section, a plan may place a claim or an interest in a particular class only if such claim or interest is substantially similar to the other claims or interests of such class. Thus, all claims in a single class are required to be substantially similar. By its terms at least it does not preclude a claim which is substantially similar to claims in one class from being separately classified in or as another, . Park Assoc., 987 F.2d 154, 159-60 (3d Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Travelers Ins. Co. v. Bryson Properties,
recognizing district courts power to admit evidence for a limited purpose holding that a debtors power to classify claims is limited recognizing a distinction between the power of a federal court to hear statelaw claims and the discretionary exercise of that power holding that a commission is a body with special and limited power and it can only exercise the power expressly or impliedly granted to it and any reasonable doubt of existence of any power must be resolved against the exercise thereof holding that the recognition power is not limited to a determination of the government to be recognized but rather includes the power to take actions without which the power of recognition might be thwarted