of $1,926 and $2,100 for electricity and natural gas bills. See In re Estate of Miller, 18 A.3d at 1169; In re Wade’s Estate, 28 A.2d at 495. Second, Appellant alleges the trial court erred in its calculation of fair market rent and maintenance for Mother while she lived at the Oakdale Property. Appellant argues that the trial court improperly based its determination on Appellee’s unsubstantiated and uncorroborated research. Appellant, however, did not object to the admission of this evidence at trial. See N.T. Trial, 5/4/10, at 252-53; R. 892a-93a. Accordingly, she waived the issue. See Pa.R.A.P. 302(a) (“Issues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., 457 Pa. 255, 322 A.2d 114, 116-17 (1974) (<HOLDING>). Third, Appellant contends she is entitled to
holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver holding that failure to object to trial courts refusal of further instruction to jury during deliberation results in waiver of issue on appeal holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue holding failure to object in timely fashion at trial results in waiver of issue for appeal holding that failure to object in a timely fashion to a magistrate judges report and recommendation generally constitutes a waiver of the defaulting partys right to appeal provided that the parties received clear notice of the consequences of their failure to object