the amendment to rule 9.146 requiring the clerk, in dependency and termination of parental rights appeals, to issue mandate as soon as practicable. PARIENTE, J., concurring. I wholeheartedly concur with the Court’s adoption of the recommendations of the Commission on District Court Performance and Accountability to address ongoing issues of unnecessary delay in dependency and termination of parental rights appeals. The Commission’s recommendations and this Court’s adoption of these amendments are based on the recognition that for every day of delay on appeal, which is added to the length of the prior ongoing court proceedings, the future of the child is in limbo to his or her potential detriment. See, e.g., N.S.H. v. Fla. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 843 So.2d 898, 903 (Fla.2003) (<HOLDING>). As the Commission stated: While courts,
holding in a termination of parental rights case that as a question of law the trial courts ruling that the facts of this case sufficiently support the termination ground of willful abandonment are reviewed de novo with no presumption of correctness holding in termination of parental rights case that trial court erred in taking judicial notice of evidence before him in guardianship hearing in same case recognizing that termination of parental rights can be accomplished only by resort to chapters 63 adoption and 39 termination of parental rights and any attempt by a parent to contract away the childs right to support is void and unenforceable as contrary to public policy recognizing that any delay in the disposition of a case concerning the termination of parental rights could result in potential detriment to the child recognizing this substantial interest in context of termination of parental rights