an incorrect factual predicate. The movie theater patron who reported the appellant to the officers was not an anonymous tipster; he was the victim of an assault who personally reported the incident to the officers and supplied his name, Carlos Feliz-Arias. Although Arias did not appear in court at the suppression hearing, he was subpoenaed as a witness and was repeatedly referred to by name at the hearing (including by defense counsel). His failure to appear, and the fact that the officers did not record his name in a report or take a written statement from him, did not render him “anonymous.” Thus, we shall not apply the law governing anonymous tips to the report given to the officers in this case. See, e.g., Florida, v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 274, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, the Supreme Court in J.L.
holding that an anonymous tip must have sufficient indicia of reliability to justify a stop and frisk holding that an anonymous tip lacking indicia of reliability that an individual is carrying a gun is not enough to justify a terry stop holding an anonymous tip had the requisite indicia of reliability to justify a stop when the caller told the police of the alleged erratic driving automobile location and vehicle description holding that anonymous call that gave police no predictive information to corroborate tip lacked sufficient indicia of reliability to justify stop and frisk holding an anonymous tip had the requisite indicia of reliability when the caller described his or her observations as reckless driving