support first-degree murder. Commonwealth v. Davido, 582 Pa. 52, 868 A.2d 431, 435 (2005). This case presents a slightly different procedural posture. Although the jury imposed a death sentence in this case, the trial court vacated that penalty and the Commonwealth has appealed the court’s decision. Thus, we have before us a case in which the death penalty was imposed and then vacated, with the Commonwealth requesting that we re-impose the death sentence. In prior cases that involved collateral review, we have characterized matters in which a lower court vacated the death sentence as ones “in which the death penalty has been imposed,” thus triggering our review of all issues properly preserved on appeal. Commonwealth v. Bryant, 566 Pa. 307, 780 A.2d 646, 648 (2001) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>). See also Commonwealth v. Collins, 585 Pa. 45,
holding that the court does not have jurisdiction to review per curiam decisions of the district courts of appeal that merely affirm with citations to cases not pending review in this court holding that the point on appeal and the objection in the trial court must be the same in order for it to be preserved for appeal holding that filing of appeal to federal circuit divests this court of jurisdiction to consider motion to stay court order pending appeal holding that issues not briefed to this court generally will not be considered on appeal holding death sentence need not be pending in order for this court to engage in review of issues on appeal