confirming that that characterization was colorable,” id., are equally applicable to remands relying on a non-jurisdictional defect. Neither the plain language of § 1447(d) nor Thermtron’s gloss on that section distinguishes between orders based on jurisdictional and non-jurisdictional grounds. See Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 343, 96 S.Ct. 584; see also Briscoe, 432 U.S. at 413 n. 13, 97 S.Ct. 2428. Moreover, appellate review of a district court’s characterization of a remand based on a non-jurisdictional defect would frustrate Congress’s intent to avoid “interruption of the litigation of the merits of a removed case by prolonged litigation” of procedural questions. Powerex, 551 U.S. at 238, 127 S.Ct. 2411; see also Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. 225, 243, 127 S.Ct. 881, 166 L.Ed.2d 819 (2007) (<HOLDING>). And as with jurisdictional defects considered
holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider petitioners argument that the evidence in the record clearly establishes that he is more likely than not to face torture if removed citation quotation marks and brackets omitted holding that bankruptcy is no exception to the due process principle that one is not bound by a judgment in personam in a litigation in which he is not designated as a party to or to which he has not been made a party by service of process internal quotation marks omitted holding that compliance with rule 3 is both a mandatory and jurisdictional prerequisite to appeal internal quotation marks omitted holding that independent review is not de novo review of the constitutional issue but only a means to determine whether the state court decision is objectively unreasonable internal quotation marks omitted holding that  1447d is an antishuttling provision aimed at preventing prolonged litigation of questions of jurisdiction of the district court to which the cause is removed internal quotation marks omitted