345 F.3d at 317 (emphasis added). See also Houston & G.N.R. Co. v. Winter, 44 Tex. 597, 611 (Tex.1876)(stating that the rural homestead exemption aims to protect the farm, mill, gin, tanyard, or whatever else had been used in connection with the residence to provide a living and support the family). 9 . 66 Tex. 494, 1 S.W. 314 (1886). 10 . 1 S.W. at 315. See also Kelly v. Nowlin, 227 S.W. 373, 375 (Tex.Civ.App.1921)("[T]he Supreme Court held that a homestead right may attach to the building alone when occupied as a residence. But that rule applies when the building is mere personalty, and not a fixture forming a part of the realty, as when the land is ow . 95-11726-MWV, 1996 LEXIS 1977 at *8-9 (Bankr.D.N.H. Apr. 22, 1996). See also In re Hacker, 260 B.R. 542, 547-48 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.2000)(<HOLDING>). 19 . Laster v. First Huntsville Props. Co.,
holding even though debtor would have been entitled to iowa homestead exemption but for former spouses iowa code section 59821 lien debtor could not avoid the lien because it attached to the homestead prior to or simultaneously with debtors acquisition of the interest in the homestead holding that a debtors boat was a movable chattel not a permanent residence entitled to homestead exemption holding that even if divorced wife only owned a beneficial interest and not title interest in the residence constituting her homestead she was nonetheless entitled to claim a homestead exemption from the forced sale of the property holding that sale of debtors boat was not made in commercially reasonable manner holding that a debtors technically incorrect exemption in a wrongful death claim based on west virginias homestead exemption stands as claimed because the trustee did not object to the exemption in time