future. Bullinger v. Wehr (In re Wehr), 292 B.R. 390, 401 (Bankr.D.N.D.2003). The primary test for measuring a debtor’s ability to pay is the “disposable income” test. Jodoin, 209 B.R. at 142 (stating that the “disposable income” test “provides an excellent starting point for measuring a debtor’s ability to pay” under § 523(a)(15)); Morris, 193 B.R. at 953 (stating that “the ‘ability to pay’ language in § 523(a)(15)(A) mirrors language used in § 1325(b)(2) which is the ‘disposable income’ standard used for considering objections to Chapter 13 plans”). In applying the “disposable income” test in the context of § 523(a)(15)(A), however, the court is not bound by the three-year limitation set forth in § 1325(b)(1)(B). Graves v. Myrvang (In re Myrvang), 232 F.3d 1116, 1122 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Samayoa v. Jodoin (In re Jodoin), 196 B.R.
holding that a bankruptcy court did not err in ordering repayment over five years holding that the district court did not err in determining that inadvertent disclosure did not result in waiver holding trial court did not err by permitting evidence that defendant molested another child three years before the victim holding that trial court did not err holding that bankruptcy court may issue proposed findings and conclusions in a core proceeding over which the bankruptcy court does not have constitutional authority