and to convert Indiana Code Section 31 — 39—1—1(a)(1) into a fishing license for prosecutors and the public alike. 895 N.E.2d at 340-41 (footnote omitted; alteration omitted). In a footnote, we clarified what a fishing expedition under the statutory exception may look like: “For example, we believe that the legislature could not have intended for Indiana Code [Section] 31 — 39—1—1(a)(1) to apply to a dis-positional order in a CHINS proceeding in which an adult charged with embezzlement is mentioned only in passing.” Id. at 341 n. 27. Here, we begin our analysis with the presumption that the November 2008 transcript is confidential, either because it is a legal record subject to Indiana Code Chapter 31-39-1 or because it is the transcript of a closed proceeding. See id. at 345-46 (<HOLDING>). And with that presumption in mind, we hold
recognizing that incidents in which inmates have obtained drugs weapons and other contraband are welldocumented in case law and regularly receive the attention of the news media holding under indiana code section 313262 that the juvenile court erred in releasing the transcript of a confidential proceeding to news media holding that access rights of the news media and of the general public are identical in scope holding that section 5601c does not authorize appeals from juvenile courts transferring a child to district court for criminal proceedings under section 5402 of the family code holding that representatives of the news media have the standing to contest a court order restricting public access to legal proceedings