in the marriage ceremony is evidence of an election to forgo support, courts should examine each case to determine if there are extraordinary circumstances to warrant the continuation of alimony. Cargill, 843 P.2d at 1342; Keller v. O’Brien, 425 Mass. 774, 683 N.E.2d 1026, 1028 (1997); Boren v. Windham, 425 So.2d 1353, 1355-56 (Miss.1983). Under this analysis, a marriage ceremony will initially terminate a former spouse’s alimony obligation. Boren, 425 So.2d at 1355. However, the alimony obligation may be revived depending on the facts of the case. Id. An annulment of the subsequent marriage does not automatically restore alimony because alimony should only be reinstated where the interests of justice are served thereby. See, e.g. Williams, 677 P.2d at 587; Peters, 214 N.W.2d at 156 (<HOLDING>); Heistand v. Heistand, 384 Mass. 20, 423
recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage holding that first husband had no knowledge of his exwifes second marriage until four days before the second marriage was annulled so he was not inconvenienced and alimony was reinstated holding husband could not have marriage annulled because wife was pregnant by him at time of marriage holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred holding that the defendants statement in an application for citizenship that he had only been married once was false even if the second marriage had been a nullity because it was bigamous