nonmoving party must present specific facts that would enable a reasonable jury to find in its favor. See Greene, 164 F.3d at 675. If the evidence “is merely colorable, or is not significantly probative, summary judgment may be granted.” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 (internal citations omitted). 2. Legal Standard for Standing Article III of the Constitution limits United S t must accept a speculative inference or assumption to link the alleged injury to the challenged action. See id.; Andrx Pharm., Inc. v. Biovail Corp. Int’l, 256 F.3d 799, 815 (D.C.Cir.2001) (declaring that the potential manufacturer’s damages were not too speculative assuming it could claim its intent and preparedness to enter the market); Advanced Mgmt. Tech. v. FAA, 211 F.3d 633, 637 (D.C.Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). Third, the plaintiff must prove that the
holding that a contractor lacked standing because it failed to show a substantial chance it would have received the contract award but for agency error holding that a contractor lacked standing on the theory of reputational injury holding that one class of plaintiffs lacked standing where damage theory was speculative abstract and impractical holding that beneficiaries of an estate lacked standing under rico to sue for an injury derivative of the estates injury holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue