(5th Cir. 2001) (“[PJrobable cause is not destroyed by a suspect’s denial.”). Having concluded that Detective Israel could rely on Officer Hammock’s report (as well as his conversation with Officer Crawford), it is obvious that he had probable cause to believe that Smith made a threat against Jordan. But Smith protests that, even if that is true, Detective Israel had no probable cause to believe that she had any intent to communicate that threat to Jordan. She argues that telling Officer Hammock he could put her threat in his report was not enough to suggest any intent to communicate her threat to Jordan. It is not clear from Georgia law whether she is correct on that point. There are several cases that suggest she is not. Cobble v. State, 268 Ga.App. 792, 603 S.E.2d 86, 87-88 (2004) (<HOLDING>); Nassau v. State, 311 Ga.App. 438, 715 S.E.2d
holding that a defendant had no intent to communicate his threats to a victim where he made them for the purpose of obtaining a diagnosis and treatment from mental health professionals holding that a defendant has the right to an order permitting him to inspect his own written or recorded statements absent a basis for a protective order holding that an enhancement under  3a12 cannot apply absent evidence that defendant knew or had reasonable cause to believe victim was a law enforcement officer holding that evidence the victim tried to keep defendant from fleeing the scene of a crime and defendant killed victim in order to escape supported the finding that murder was committed to avoid arrest holding that threats made in the presence of a law enforcement officer were sufficient evidence to indicate an intent to communicate because the victim had a protective order against the defendant and the defendant had just violated that order