appointed expert” in § 1920(6) as an enumerated cost with the government's broad waiver of sovereign immunity in mind. 16 . Dickerson, 280 F.3d at 478; Lebron, 279 F.3d at 332; Gibbs, 210 F.3d at 506-08. 17 . Hull v. United States, 53 F.3d 1125, 1128-29 (10th Cir.1995) (upholding taxation of guardian ad litem fees as costs against non-prevailing government in an FTCA case under Rule 54(d)) (post-Crawford Fitting)', Kollsman v. Cohen, 996 F.2d 702, 706 (4th Cir.1993) (remanding for the district court to determine which costs were attributable to role of guardian ad litem versus attorney ad litem and to charge them against nonprevail-ing party pursuant to court’s authority under Rule 54(d)) (post-Crawford Fitting); Schneider v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 658 F.2d 835, 854 (D.C.Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>) (pre-Crawford Fitting), abrogated on other
holding the trial court had jurisdiction where summons was served on the attorney advocate for the juveniles guardian ad litem holding the district court properly allowed guardian ad litem fees to be taxed as costs holding that guardian ad litems extensive advice to plaintiffs attorney and daily involvement in case exceeded formal role of guardian ad litem holding that guardian ad litem and psychologist fees incurred in child custody proceedings and ordered to be paid directly to the guardian ad litem and psychologist were nondischargeable under  523a5 holding that a statute that provided that the court may appoint a guardian ad litem left the court with discretion to make an appointment