continuously engaged as choir director during the two years immediately preceding the filing of the visa petition, because the work schedule indicated that Park served at most thirteen hours per week in music-related activities. Park and the Church filed an action for declaratory relief in the district court, claiming that the revocation of the third I-360 petition was not supported by “sufficient and good cause.” The district court granted summary judgment for the government. This appeal followed. DISCUSSION The district court’s jurisdiction to review CIS’ revocation of the Church’s visa petition is predicated on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and reinforced by the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(2). ANA Int'l, Inc. v. Way, 393 F.3d 886, 890 (9th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Our appellate jurisdiction arises under 28
holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001 holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983 holding that 18 usc  241 and 42 usc  3631 fall within a separate exception to rav holding that 28 usc  2636c did not modify the filing requirement in 19 usc  1516aa2a holding that visa revocations pursuant to 8 usc  1155 are not made unreviewable by either 8 usc  1252a2bii or 5 usc  701a2