if that appears necessary in order to ensure that the punishment still fits both crime and criminal.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 130, quoting State v. Raucci, supra, 21 Conn. App. 563-64. Accordingly, we concluded that, under the aggregate package theory, the trial court “may reconstruct the sentence in any way necessary to ensure that the punishment fits both the crime and the defendant, as long as the final sentence does not exceed [the original sentence of] forty years.” State v. Miranda, supra, 130; see also State v. Miranda, 274 Conn. 727, 735 n.5, 878 A.2d 1118 (2005) (noting that under aggregate package theory, “we must vacate a sentence in its entirety when we invalidate any part of the total sentence”); State v. Arceniega, 84 Conn. App. 326, 329, 853 A.2d 586 (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 926, 859 A.2d 581
holding that erroneous admission of evidence was harmless where it had no substantial and injurious effect or influence on the jury verdict judged in relation to the total evidence on the issue in question internal quotation marks omitted holding that an appeal is not moot so long as the appellate court can fashion relief that is both effective and equitable internal quotation marks omitted alteration in original recognizing that procedural sentencing error is harmless if the resulting sentence is not longer thanthat to which the defendant would otherwise be subject alterations and internal quotation marks omitted holding that the maximum possible sentence provided by law for conviction of the offense charged is the most important consequence of the plea internal quotation marks omitted recognizing that the total effective sentence as originally imposed is the backdrop that must be kept in mind not the individual sentences comprising the total term internal quotation marks omitted