CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Augsberger v. State, 655 So.2d 1202, 1205 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Ball v. State, 758 So.2d 1239, 1240
holding waiver of right to counsel at sentencing not voluntary when trial court tried to dissuade discharge of counsel defendant believed incompetent for the waiver to be voluntary the trial court must inquire into the reasons for the defendants dissatisfaction with his counsel to ensure that the defendant is not exercising a choice between incompetent or unprepared counsel and appearing pro se holding that denial of request for continuance to allow retained counsel to prepare for trial did not deny defendant effective assistance of counsel when defendant had waited more than two months to retain an attorney courtappointed counsel appeared competent and defendants motion failed to state when retained counsel would be ready holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to continue trial three months where although trial was complex and records were voluminous court had already granted two prior continuances and continuance of three weeks was sufficient to prepare for trial holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to substitute counsel when reasons for defendants dissatisfaction with his attorney were made known to court through a letter and orally at sentencing holding that trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion to continue for purposes of hiring private counsel on eve of trial where defendant had several months to do so and failed to articulate sufficient reasons for his dissatisfaction with appointed counsel