978 (2008), rev den, 346 Or 364 (2009). Under ORS 144.103(1), a defendant sentenced to a term of imprisonment for committing certain sexual offenses, including first-degree sexual abuse, “shall serve a term of post-prison supervision that continues until the term of the post-prison supervision, when added to the term of imprisonment served, equals the maximum statutory indeterminate sentence for the violation.” The maximum statutory indeterminate sentence for first-degree sexual abuse, a Class B felony, is 10 years. ORS 163.427(2); ORS 161.605(2). Thus, it follows that the court erred in imposing a 10-year period of post-prison supervision. We have previously treated similar errors as apparent on the face of the record. See, e.g., State v. Johnson, 212 Or App 135, 157 P3d 295 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, for the reasons we articulated in
holding that omission was not plain error holding that imposition of excessive term of postprison supervision under ors 144103 was plain error recognizing plain or fundamental error holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error holding that plain error exists when 1 an error was committed 2 that was plain 3 that affected the defendants substantial rights and 4 the error seriously affects the fairness integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings