decks and the stairwell are not one contiguous space with identical uses. The city may not limit the stairwell’s intended uses with reference to the parking lot’s intended uses. Here, decedent was using the stairwell for its intended purpose: ascending or descending the stairs on foot. Although Haywood’s and Huerta’s deposition testimonies differ substantially regarding their specific movements, both youths testified they were moving around the garage and told decedent to follow them. Rather than using the ramps, decedent used the stairwell. The city built the stairwell to provide pedestrian access to the garage. No evidence shows decedent was, for example, bicycling, roller skating, skateboarding, or driving down the stairwell. See, e.g., Curtis, 98 Ill. 2d at 165, 456 N.E.2d at 120 (<HOLDING>). The city argues decedent was not an intended
holding the passenger in a drag racing car was not within the class of persons the government intended to use the highways holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search holding an officer may order a passenger to get out of a car during a traffic stop and may frisk a passenger for weapons if the officer reasonably suspects the passenger is armed and dangerous holding that a third party who received allegedly defective products as gifts from a consumer was not within the class of persons that cutpa was intended to protect holding that a passenger has standing to challenge a stops constitutionality because the passenger is seized from the moment a car is stopped