have probable cause to search an entire vehicle, they may conduct a warrantless search of every part of the vehicle and its contents, including all containers and packages in the vehicle. United States v. Ross, 456 U.S. 798, 821 & n. 28, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 2171 & n. 28, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982). A warrantless search of Cruz’s truck was therefore proper because the officers had probable cause to believe that it contained contraband in light of the construction that they had observed the suspects perform on the trailer. The almost two hour delay before making the search was not unreasonable and does not change the result. “There is no re quirement that the warrantless search of a vehicle occur contemporaneously with its lawful seizure.” United States v. Johns, 469 U.S. at 484, 105 S.Ct. 885 (<HOLDING>). In light of our conclusion that the law
holding warrantless search of packages seized three days earlier from trucks which were suspected of being involved in drug smuggling operation was not unreasonable holding that when officers had probable cause to search vehicles for contraband a warrantless search three days after the trucks had been seized of packages unloaded from the vehicles was reasonable holding that the question of whether the police had reasonable suspicion and probable cause to make a warrantless search should be reviewed de novo holding warrantless search of defendants automobile four days after impoundment was permissible under requirements of fourth amendment and state constitution where officers had probable cause to search vehicle when it was impounded and that probable cause continued between the time of the impoundment and the search holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry