likewise shown to be identified with Venice, Italy. Relying on a gazetteer, an encyclopedia, published books, and web sites, the examiner established that the lion in the applicant’s mark specifically reproduces the winged Lion of St. Mark with its paw embracing a stone tablet. The examiner further observed that this figure appears on the official Venetian flag, on the regional flag of Veneto, and in statuary found throughout the city of Venice. Moreover, the examiner noted that the Venetian flag with the Lion of St. Mark has symbolized the city of Venice since, some believe, the ninth century. Therefore, the , 6-7 (Fed.Cir.1985). A registered mark on goods other than those previously registered carries no presumption of distinctiveness. In re Loew’s, 769 F.2d at 769, 226 USPQ at 869 (<HOLDING>). Here, the proposed composite mark is an
holding that notice of judgment was insufficient holding a certification of service and presentment was insufficient to establish the trial court received actual notice of the defendants motion for new trial holding that generalized notice of copyright infringements was insufficient to establish knowledge for the purpose of contributory liability holding applicants incontestable registration of a service mark for cash management account did not automatically entitle applicant to registration of that mark for broader financial services holding incontestable mark durango for cigars insufficient to establish distinctiveness of durango for chewing tobacco