was a potential market for the materials, as a practical commercial matter that market no longer exists. Basic economics and market dynamics have thus closed the window on any potential of a continuing, ongoing, open-ended scheme intended to fraudulently induce the shipment of paper materials from generators or collectors such as Meserole. The alleged conduct, which was targeted to affect at most four victims over the relatively short and closed period of between six and fourteen months, is insufficient to establish a RICO pattern. C.f. Vild v. Visconsi, 956 F.2d 560, 569-70 (6th Cir.1992) (affirming the district court’s holding that plaintiff did not prove continuity because the activities lasted only six or seven months); Griffin v. NBD Bank, 43 F.Supp.2d 780, 788-89 (W.D.Mich.1999) (<HOLDING>); Gotham Print, Inc. v. American Speedy
holding that there was no indication of a continuing scheme because the undisputed facts showed that the alleged scheme was of a relatively short duration  between three and eleven months holding that there was no employment contract where personnel manual provided that after three months an employee became a permanent employee where there was no additional expression as to duration holding that delay of eleven months did not justify denial of leave to amend holding that there was no question that the full and fair opportunity element was met where there was no indication that such an opportunity was unavailable recognizing that enhancement requires control over a participant in the scheme not only control over the scheme itself