criminalize all the possible methods by which a debtor or any other person may attempt to defeat the intent and effect of the Bankruptcy Code and that the expansive scope of the statute “reaches beyond the wrongful sequestration of a debtor’s property and also encompasses the knowing and fraudulent making of false oaths or declarations in the context of a bankruptcy proceeding.” Id. at 423 (citing Key, 859 F.2d at 1259-60). In addition, Ellis commented that the omission of material information in a bankruptcy filing “impedes a bankruptcy court’s fulfilling of its responsibilities just as much as an explicitly false statement.” Id. (affirming § 152 conviction of debtor for omission of prior bankruptcies from petition); see also United States v. Cherek, 734 F.2d 1248, 1254 (7th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014, 105 S.Ct. 2016,
holding president of corporation liable as employer where he inter alia maintained control over the corporations employment and pay practices and had the authority to make all major decisions regarding the corporations business affairs holding that while a state statute granted a foreign corporation the rights and privileges enjoyed by domestic corporations it did not transform such corporations into domestic or resident corporations holding that failure by corporation president to list asset on corporations bankruptcy petition was omission of material information supporting a  152 conviction holding that securities of other corporations may of course be acquired by a delaware corporation holding that omission of information about shares held in corporations was material even if the securities were worthless at the time