(1986). See also 1-2 Weinstein’s Evidence § 103 at [7][a] (2005). Plain error is an error that affects the defendant's substantial rights and would seriously affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial pro 1) (ruling that the practice of chiropractic is the practice of medicine in a restricted form); McKissick v. Frye, 255 Kan. 566, 876 P.2d 1371, 1390 (1994) (stating that the practice of chiropractic is recognized as a healing art so that a chiropractor is qualified to testify regarding future medical care the plaintiff would need); Rodgers v. Sparks, 228 Neb. 191, 421 N.W.2d 785, 790 (1988) (ruling that chiropractic testimony was "competent medical testimony” on the issues of causation and permanent impairment); and Knapp v. Wilkins, 786 So.2d 457, 462 (Ala.2000)
recognizing that a licensed chiropractor is a health care provider competent to testify as a medical expert holding that an assisted living facility licensed to provide personal care was not licensed to engage primarily in providing nursing care holding that standard of care need not be listed separately in report when same standard applies to each health care provider holding that nurse who is familiar with the standard of care at another similar hospital can qualify by experience to testify as a medical expert in a medical malpractice action holding that an expert is not competent to testify as to statutory interpretation