had failed to show “a patent violation of law, or such a palpable abuse of authority as to be commensurate with illegality”). However, there is an exception to this general rule for cases in which an administrative agency commits a public wrong or violates substantive rights without giving an equal benefit in return. Newhall, 54 So.2d at 50. In Newhall, the Newhall Drainage District and a landowner filed a complaint requesting that the court enjoin the Board of Commissioners of Everglades Drainage District from (1) placing two culverts under a state road to allow flood waters- to enter canals in the Newhall District and (2) cleaning, widening, and deepening the main diversion canal in the Newhall District so that it could receive floodwaters. 54 So.2d at 48. The c a. 1st DCA 1980) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the trial court recognized the
holding that simply dumping a hazardous substance onto land or into water is an abnormally dangerous activity holding that the department of transportation may be enjoined from diverting water flow onto a landowners property holding that article x  2 of the california constitution dictates the basic principles defining water rights that no one can have a protectible interest in the unreasonable use of water and that holders of water rights must use water reasonably and beneficially holding that a board of county commissioners may be enjoined from flooding private property recognizing that water rights constitute a real property interest