("Evidence of a proposal or acceptance thereof is admissible only in proceedings to enforce an accepted proposal or to determine the imposition of sanctions.”). Although neither party objects to making the offer of judgment part of the record, as in all cases, we do not supplement the record with facts not in either the trial or appellate record. 12 . Appellate courts have upheld decisions where the trial court found no prevailing party under the “significant issues” test in breach of contract litigation. See Brevard County Fair Ass’n v. Cocoa Expo, Inc., 832 So.2d 147, 151 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002) (where both parties prevail on significant issues, the trial judge has the discretion to determine neither party prevailed); Hutchinson v. Hutchinson, 687 So.2d 912, 913 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997) (<HOLDING>); KCIN, Inc. v. Canpro Investments, Ltd., 675
holding that a party can be liable in tort for actions authorized by the contract holding that in an action for breach of contract only nominal damages can be recovered if there is no evidence produced from which the facts necessary to determine damages under the proper rule can be determined holding in landlordtenant case that the court has discretion to characterize neither party as prevailing where each party prevailed on a main issue recognizing the trial courts discretion to consider the equities and determine which party has in fact prevailed on the significant issues recognizing that there can be compelling circumstances in which a trial court can determine that neither party prevailed in a contract case