113, 115 (N.D.N.Y.1998) (“[A]n attorney has a continuing duty of loyalty to a client which constrains the attorney from representing another party whose interests are adverse to the interests of the former client.”); In re Jaeger, 213 B.R. 578, 587 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1997) (“[T]he attorney has a duty of loyalty to the former client which prohibits the attorney from undertaking a representation adverse to a former client in a matter substantially related to the prior representation of that client.”); New York v. McLaughlin, 174 Misc.2d 181, 662 N.Y.S.2d 1019, 1022 (Sup.Ct.1997) (“A conflict of interest exists when an attorney’s current representation is impaired by the loyalty he owes a former client.”). Contrary to defendants’ assertion, numerous courts have hel 2d 577, 582 (N.D.Tex.1997) (<HOLDING>); PGH Int’l, Inc. v. Gabor Shoes AG (In re PGH
holding that the substantial relationship test also concerns the duty of loyalty to a former client holding that an attorney may only undertake to represent a new client against a former client  where there is no confidential information received from the former client that is in any way relevant to representation of the current client holding that attorneys should be disqualified where the substantial relationship test is met in order to assure that the confidentiality of the attorneyclient relationship and the loyalty between attorney and client are preserved recognizing that an attorney has a duty of loyalty to his client holding that the substantial relationship test embodies a broader concept than the rule of confidentiality  that of continuing fidelity to a former client  a duty of loyalty