with victim’s murder). ¶ 99 The record also reveals substantial evidence that Forde acted with reckless indifference to human life. Tison, 481 U.S. at 157-58, 107 S.Ct. 1676. She planned the home invasion with Gaxiola and Oakstar knowing they wanted to kill Flores because they believed that he competed with their drag operation. She led a late-night home invasion with armed men, including Gaxiola, and barged into the victims’ home, threatening violence. Even if Forde intended only to rob the victims, doing so by invading their home at night with armed men — at least one of whom was motivated to kill Flores — demonstrated Forde’s awareness that her criminal activities carried a grave risk of death to others. See id,.; cf. State v. Robinson, 165 Ariz. 51, 62, 796 P.2d 853, 864 (1990) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 100 Additionally, after Bush killed Flores
holding that there was sufficient evidence of premeditation and deliberation when the defendant previously planned to commit the robbery armed himself with a shotgun and shot the victim during the robbery holding that a fleeing suspect in a car was seized only when an officer actually shot him not when several officers previously shot his vehicles tires in an effort to stop him holding an indictment alleging that the defendant did unlawfully kill the victim during the perpetration of aggravated robbery in violation of tca 3913202 sufficient because it contained a specific reference to the statute which was sufficient to place the accused on notice of the charged offense holding that defendants presence when victims were tied during home robbery terrorized with firearms and then shot was sufficient to demonstrate reckless indifference even though defendant did not actually kill holding that reference to the appropriate statute was sufficient in felony murder indictments alleging that the defendant did unlawfully kill the victims during the perpetration of aggravated robbery in violation of tca 3913202