their new policy to the Court, within a time frame acceptable to the district court, for review. B. Establishment of Religion Plaintiff has claimed the Defendants created an impermissible establishment of religion by allowing only the “Holy Bible” when he was on his morning lockout from approximately 5:00 a.m. until 7:00 a.m. The Defendants stated that during this time, the inmates were allowed one religious text. Plaintiff and other inmates testified at hearing that only the “Holy Bible” was allowed. Many cases have found that prohibiting “most other” reading materials, while establishing an exception for “Bibles” or the like, constitutes a governmental encouragement or establishment of a particular religious doctrine. See, e.g., Parnell v. Waldrep, 511 F.Supp. 764 (D.C.N.C.1981) (<HOLDING>). The establishment clause clearly applies to
holding no violation of federal establishment clause holding that the endorsing requirement does not violate the establishment clause holding that establishment of christmas day as legal public holiday did not violate establishment clause holding the refusal to allow inmates paperback books magazines and newspapers is unconstitutional and the jail can not prohibit the receipt of these reading materials while allowing an exception for bi bles and little christian tracts  without violating the establishment clause recognizing that the court had to first consider whether the object in question can be defined as religious for establishment clause purposes