it for providing medical services to New Jersey Medicaid patients. In accordance with N.J.A.C. 10:52— 1.17(b), the rate at which it is compensated for providing those services is the pertinent Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) rate established by the appropriate Pennsylvania administrative agency. Children’s Hospital was a party to federal court litigation in which Pennsylvania’s system for establishing DRG rates for its hospitals was held to violate federal law because the system resulted in compensating hospitals at rates that were not “reasonable and adequate to meet costs incurred by efficiently and economically operated facilities,” particularly those serving disproportionate numbers of low-income patients with special needs. Temple University v. White, 729 F.Supp. 1093 (E.D.Pa.1990) (<HOLDING>), 732 F.Supp. 1327 (ordering interim relief),
holding that an employers requirement that an employee comply with a performance improvement plan or face disciplinary action did not constitute adverse employment action holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in striking fact statements that did not comply with the local rules holding that plan did not comply holding that plan administrator of an erisa health plan did not have to anticipate the confusion of a plan participant holding that a public trust that exercised control over the beneficiarys employment did not change the benefit plan into a government plan because the trust did not establish the plan or control it