opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Furman Benjamin Quattlebaum appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782. The district court denied Quattlebaum’s motion because, after recognizing that Quattlebaum was already denied relief under Amendment 782, the district court sua sponte determined that it lacked jurisdiction to entertain Quattlebaum’s motion under United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010) (<HOLDING>), and United States v. Mann, 435 Fed.Appx. 254,
holding that rule 59e applies to a motion to reconsider holding that court is not required to state findings of fact and conclusions of law when denying  3582 motion holding the finality of a bia order is not affected by a subsequent motion to reconsider holding that dhss motion to reconsider was a collateral attack on a bia order holding that no provision authorizes a district court to reconsider its order on a  3582 motion