CURIAM. See Dickerson v. Feldman, 426 F.Supp.2d 130 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. ORFINGER, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ.,
holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to certify class action when claims were so individualized that certification was improper holding that because no class was certified at the time the individual claims were dismissed the class action was properly dismissed holding where plaintiffs stake in controversy disappears before there has been effort to certify class action the action must be dismissed holding that a class action is not mooted by the intervening resolution of the controversy as to the named plaintiffs holding that to maintain a class action the existence of the class must be pleaded and the limits of the class must be defined with some specificity