period under the first Mendozar-Martinez factor weighed in favor of finding SORNA to be punitive in effect, the Court determined that the remaining six factors weighed against finding SORNA to be punitive in effect, or that they were of little weight. As such, the Perez Court -concluded that Perez had not “shown by the ‘clearest proof that the effects of SORNA are sufficiently punitive to overcome the General Assembly’s preferred categorization.” Perez, 97 A.3d at 759. This Court has also rejected claims that SORNA’s 15-year registration requirement was ■ effectively punitive. See Commonwealth v. Giannantonio, 114 A.3d 429, 437 (Pa.Super.2015) (applying Perez); see also Commonwealth v. McDonough, 96 A.3d 1067, 1069 (Pa.Super.2014), appeal denied, — Pa. -, 108 A.3d 34 (2015) (<HOLDING>). However, no Pennsylvania court has yet
holding that sex offender registration statute is civil and nonpunitive and recognizing that ejnsuring public safety is  a fundamental regulatory goal holding sornas 15year registration requirement to be nonpunitive for purposes of whether it constitutes unconstitutionally excessive punishment holding that the requirement of sex offender registration for the defendants conviction of false imprisonment of a minor was not cruel and unusual punishment and did not violate substantive or procedural due process holding the death penalty excessive punishment for the crime of rape holding that sex offender registration and notification do not constitute punishment