(1982) (remanding for entry of judgment on misdemeanor breaking or entering where evidence was sufficient to support that offense, but not felonious intent). IV. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Defendant next argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because his trial counsel failed to move in limine to exclude evidence that he had been arrested on an unrelated breaking or entering charge and initially failed to object to introduction of that evidence at trial. When his trial counsel did object to the State’s attempt to call a witness in rebuttal to testify regarding the other charge, the trial court sustained the objection under Rule 403. To prevail in a claim for [ineffective assistance o 359 (1987), State v. Lamson, 75 N.C. App. 132, 133, 135, 330 S.E.2d 68, 68, 70 (<HOLDING>), disc. rev. denied, 314 N.C. 545, 335 S.E.2d
holding that squatter in home did not have standing to challenge search of house where he was staying holding that the evidence was sufficient to preclude inference where defendant believed house to be that of his girlfriend and nothing in the dwelling had been disturbed holding that the evidence was sufficient to preclude inference where he tried to enter the house drunk and was staying at the neighboring house holding that squatter had no standing to challenge search of abandoned house where he was staying holding that defendant staying in abandoned house had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the house despite having a key to the house and the ability to let people in and out of it