enhancement” and committed him to Western State Hospital for the maximum sentence for first degree assault without adding an enhanced sentence. CP at 49 (emphasis added). The duration of possible confinement on a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity of a first degree assault, with or without an enhancement, is always life. RCW 10.77.025(1); RCW 9A.20.021(l)(a). Thus, the deadly weapon or firearm enhancement has no effect on the confinement’s length and this error did not prejudice Schwab. 6 The State argues that we should not review whether Schwab’s counsel was ineffective because he had no constitutional right to counsel for the petition now on appeal, but rather was appointed counsel by the trial court’s discretion. See State v. Robinson, 153 Wn.2d 689, 696, 107 P.3d 90 (2005) (<HOLDING>). Underlying this argument is the question of
holding that there is no constitutional right to counsel for crr 78 motions unless provided elsewhere in the rules or constitution holding that there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation holding that there is no constitutional right to appeal a criminal conviction holding that there is no right to counsel beyond the initial direct appeal and thus no right to counsel on discretionary review holding that there is no federal or colorado constitutional right to postconviction counsel but there is a limited statutory right