that Roberson had prior drug-related convictions. Officer Fang-man learned from a neighbor that high-volume traffic occurred around the house in a manner consistent with drug trafficking. An analysis of the trash from the residence revealed a box of baking soda, which is often used in cocaine trafficking, as well as plastic baggies, one of which was clipped at the corner in a manner consistent with cocaine packaging. Significantly, the baggies field-tested positive for cocaine residue. The totality of these circumstances provided the magistrate with a substantial basis to conclude that there was probable cause to issue the warrant. Indeed, under analogous circumstances, we have affirmed the existence of probable cause. See United States v. Laurrence, 308 F.3d 623, 627 (6th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Hill, 142 F.3d at 310-11 (affirming decision
holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant holding that informants identity should not be revealed where informant witnessed unrelated crime and reported it to the police who then only used the information to create probable cause for a search warrant holding that the district court acted within its discretion in not allowing a confidential informant to testify in support of the defendants suppression motion because even if the informants statements regarding drug activity were excised from the search warrant affidavit the remaining information obtained through a trash pull which revealed plastic bags containing wrappers with cocaine residue supplied sufficient probable cause for the search warrant holding that a totality of circumstances standard was proper for determining probable cause for issuance of a search warrant based on information from an informant holding that where information obtained from illegal warrantless search of a briefcase was used to establish probable cause for the warrant to search briefcase evidence obtained pursuant to the warrant was properly suppressed