See State v. Gibbs, 82 Vt. 526, 528, 74 A. 229, 230 (1909); Commonwealth v. Blackington, 24 Pick. 352, 358 (Mass. 1837) (“[T]he exclusive authority and power to sell spirit by retail, is not conferred on the licensed person, as a benefit or privilege to him, or with a view to give him an exclusive right; but solely because the peace and security, the morals and good order of the community, will be promoted by it, and the exclusive power therefore is collateral and incidental, and not one of the objects and purposes of the law.”). Instead, a license to sell intoxicating liquors is a permit to sell, subject to restrictions, and the licensee accepts this privilege, subject to such conditions as the Board sees fit to impose. Cf. Green Mountain Post No. 1, 117 Vt. at 409, 94 A.2d at 233 (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, the granting and conditioning of
holding that license may be subject to conditions that the general assembly chooses to enact holding that because the general assembly did not expressly include conspiracy among those offenses defined as crimes of violence we conclude that one convicted of conspiracy may not be sentenced pursuant to  1611309la holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license holding that a conviction for an offense involving dishonesty or false statement may be used to impeach the credibility of a defendant who chooses to testify holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer