at least one aggravating factor that flows directly from the jury's verdict, or is admitted by the defendant, or is based on the defendant's prior convictions." 148 P.3d at 984-85. Accordingly, even though the superior court gave Twogood an enhanced sentence for first-degree sexual assault (.e, a sentence that exceeded the applicable 8-year presumptive term) without submitting any of the State's proposed aggravating factors to a jury, the superior court did not commit plain error under Blakely. Conclusion The judgement of the superior court is AFFIRMED. 1 . Former AS 12.55.125(i)(1)(A) (pre-March 2005 version}. 2 . Former AS 12.55.125(b) (pre-March 2005 version). 3 . Former AS 12.55.155(a)(2) (pre-March 2005 version); Cleveland v. State, 143 P.3d 977, 984-85 (Alaska App.2006) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Criminal Rule 36 provides, in pertinent
holding that an indictment for capital murder must contain at least one aggravating factor holding that in cases governed by alaskas premarch 2005 presumptive sentencing law a defendants right to jury trial under blakely v washington is satisfied if the superior court found at least one blakelycompliant aggravating factor holding that under the sixth amendment right to trial by jury aggravating factors that operate as the functional equivalent of an element of a charged offense must be found by a jury holding an increase in the sentence above the presumptive term in indianas sentencing scheme unconstitutional under blakely holding that blakely does not apply to the federal sentencing guidelines