standard of review on the ultimate reasonable suspicion inquiry is de novo, the district court is at an institutional advantage, having observed the testimony of the witnesses and understanding local conditions, in making this determination. Accordingly, ‘due weight’ should be given to the inferences drawn from the facts by ‘resident judges.’ ” United States v. Caruthers, 458 F.3d 459, 464 (6th Cir.2006) (internal quotation marks, citations, and alterations omitted). Ill A Before explaining our reasons for affirming the district court, we must briefly dispose of one of the arguments that the government has brought before this Court. The government contends that we need not analyze the broadcasted tip under Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 270-72, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000) (<HOLDING>). In support of its argument, the government
holding that an anonymous tip lacking indicia of reliability that an individual is carrying a gun is not enough to justify a terry stop holding that an anonymous tip must have sufficient indicia of reliability to justify a stop and frisk holding that an anonymous callers barebones tip that a young black male wearing a plaid shirt and standing at a particular bus stop was carrying a gun without more was insufficient to justify an officers stop and frisk of the man holding that an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun  without any corroborating evidence  did not provide reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing justifying the officers stop and frisk of that person holding that a mere anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun  without any corroborating evidence  does not provide a reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing justifying the officers stop and frisk of that person