the frisk. See Johnson, 555 U.S. at 331-32. Here, the district court failed to apply this dual requirement when it found Dean’s pat-down was justified by officer safety concerns but did not determine whether Dean’s initial detention was justified by reasonable suspicion that Dean was engaged in criminal activity. It appears the district court may have mistakenly applied the line of cases giving law enforcement officers authority to detain occupants of a home during the execution of a search warrant authorizing a search of the home, without any particularized suspicion of criminal activity by the individuals detained. See, e.g., Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 98, 161 L. Ed. 2d 299, 125 S. Ct. 1465 (2005); Michigan v. Summers, 452 U.S. 692, 705, 69 L. Ed. 2d 340, 101 S. Ct. 2587 (1981) (<HOLDING>); see also Ybarra v. Illinois, 444 U.S. 85,
holding that officers may detain the occupants of a house while executing a search warrant holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence holding that a warrant to search for contraband founded on probable cause implicitly carries with it the limited authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted holding that officers may detain the occupants of a vehicle while executing a search warrant holding that officers executing a search warrant for contraband have the authority to detain the occupants of the premises while a proper search is conducted