without the coverage, the insurer is obligated to defend if there is potentially a case under the complaint within the policy coverage. See National Union Fire Ins. Co., 939 S.W.2d at 141. Because the factual allegations contained within paragraph 5.4 indicate the plaintiffs may have a complaint within the coverage of the policy, we cannot say the underlying suit falls outside the scope of the policy. See id. SLIC also argues the plaintiffs’ underly- . ing petition does not include any allegations that fall within the scope of the terms “error” and “omission” as those terms are used in the policy. These terms, however, are not defined in the policy. We therefore give these terms their ordinary and generally accepted meaning. Sec. Mut. Cas. Co. v. Johnson, 584 S.W.2d 708, 704 (Tex.1979) (<HOLDING>). An error is “an act or condition of ignorant
recognizing that the court must give meaning to all the words in the claims holding that we must give the words in statutes their plain and ordinary meaning recognizing we must give insurance policy language its ordinary and generally accepted meaning unless the policy shows that the words used are intended to impart a technical or different meaning recognizing that we must give meaning to all the words in the claims holding that we must give effect to the plain and ordinary meaning of a statutes language