petition, grant the motion for rehearing, and issue this opinion. Within the sixty-day time limit, counsel filed a rule 3.800(c) motion to mitigate petitioner’s sentence seeking a youthful offender sentence to avoid a mandatory ten-year term under the 10-20-Life statute. At the same time, counsel asked the court to grant an extension of time for a hearing on the motion to mitigate. The State did not object to granting the extension. Because the 3.800(c) motion was not delivered to the judge until after the time had expired, the motion was struck as untimely, and the judge did not rule on the request for an extension of time. We vacate the trial court’s order and remand for the court to rule on petitioner’s request for an extension of time. See Abreu v. State, 660 So.2d 703 (Fla.1995) (<HOLDING>). FARMER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ.,
holding that a motion to continue a hearing on a postjudgment motion was ineffective to extend the period for the trial court to rule on the motion absent the express consent of the parties holding that a second motion to reconsider served within ten days of the denial of the first motion does not extend the time period for filing a notice of appeal from the underlying judgment holding that orders denying motions to mitigate sentence under florida rule of criminal procedure 3800c are not appealable holding that pursuant to florida rule of criminal procedure 3050 the court may extend the sixtyday time limit for a motion to mitigate sentence as long as the motion to mitigate is resolved within a reasonable time holding that a defendant claiming immunity pursuant to section 7760321 florida statutes must file a motion to dismiss pursuant to florida rule of criminal procedure 3190b and requiring trial court to address the motion at a pretrial evidentiary hearing