the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. E.g., Tedder, 677 So.2d at 1263.” (Emphasis added.) See also Hill v. State, 594 So.2d 246 (Ala.Crim.App.1992). In Henley v. State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles, 849 So.2d 255, 260 (Ala.Crim.App.2002), we noted: “This rationale is also found in § 41-22-3(3), which provides that the Board is not subject to provisions relating to due process at an administrative hearing when it ‘considers the granting or denial of pardons, paroles or restoration of civil and political rights or remission of fines and forfeitures.’ ” Thus, the opportunity to be released on parole is a privilege, or a matter of grace, rather than a right in Alabama. Compare Coslett v. State, 697 So.2d 61, 64 (Ala.Crim.App.1997) (<HOLDING>). Alabama courts have previously held that
holding that production of documents without a claim of privilege waives the right to later claim that privilege holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision recognizing privilege holding that the opportunity to earn good time is a privilege not a right in alabama