and gave conflicting story to that of driver before being asked for identification); Tardiff v. State, 548 S.W.2d 380, 381-82 (Tex.Crim.App.1977) (question by one passenger about person wanted by police, weaving back and forth, and smell of marijuana on both passengers); Borner v. State, 521 S.W.2d 852, 854-55 (Tex.Crim.App.1975) (passenger observed attempting to stuff something between seats); Wood v. State, 515 S.W.2d 300, 305 (Tex.Crim.App.1974) (passenger appeared intoxicated); Leonard v. State, 496 S.W.2d 576, 577 (Tex.Crim.App.1973) (officer smelled odor of marijuana coming from vehicle as he bent down to look at passenger); see also Rhodes v. State, 945 S.W.2d 115, 116-17 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 894, 118 S.Ct. 236, 139 L.Ed.2d . 360, 789 N.E.2d 260, 270 (2003) (<HOLDING>); State v. Riley, 501 N.W.2d 487, 489 (Iowa
holding that an officers request of a passenger who was present solely by virtue of the coincidence he was a passenger for the passengers identification just because the officer wanted to know who he was dealing with for safety purposes constituted an unlawful detention holding officers request for passengers identification during stop constituted lawful consensual encounter holding officers request for passengers identification not unreasonable although unrelated to reason for stop where it did not prolong detention and passenger was under no obligation to answer holding that an officers request for a citizens identification by itself did not amount to a seizure holding asking passenger for identification not improper