and citation omitted); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 704 (quoting Hawkins); see also Archie, 340 S.W.3d at 739 (noting mistrial appropriate when the objectionable events "are so emotionally inflammatory that curative instructions are not likely to prevent the jury from being unfairly prejudiced against the defendant” (internal quotation marks and ■citation omitted)). 7 .Hawkins, 135 S.W.3d at 77; Mosley, 983 S.W.2d at 259. 8 . Wesbrook v. State, 29 S.W.3d 103, 115 (Tex. Crim.App.2000), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 944, 121 S.Ct. 1407, 149 L.Ed.2d 349 (2001); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 704. 9 . Archie, 340 S.W.3d at 741; Thrift v. State, 176 S.W.3d 221, 224 (Tex.Crim.App.2005); Whitney, 396 S.W.3d at 706. 10 .Thrift, 176 S.W.3d at 224. 11 . See Waldo v. State, 746 S.W.2d 750, 756 (Tex.Crim.App.1988)
recognizing that upon request the trial court may provide a limiting instruction to the jury holding good faith jury instruction unnecessary when court gave adequate specific intent instruction holding good faith jury instruction is not necessary when the court has given an adequate specific intent instruction holding trial courts instruction adequate when defendant failed to request a sharper rebuke before moving for a mistrial holding defendant implicitly consented to trial courts declaration of a mistrial