Cir.1992) (“Our circuit does not believe that under Wong Sun or Brown, the Government is required to show attenuation beyond a finding of voluntary, valid consent under Fourth Amendment standards.” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Following Oguns, we consider whether the initial entry into Bean’s apartment was unlawful so as to require a separate inquiry into taint. b. The Claimed Illegal Entry Snype asserts that the initial entry into Bean’s apartment was unlawful under the Fourth Amendment because it was not supported by a search warrant. The government responds that Snype cannot raise this complaint because the entry, at least as it pertained to him, was supported by a warrant for his arrest. See Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 602-03, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980) (<HOLDING>). Further, the government submits that the
holding that an arrest warrant  without a search warrant  does not permit law enforcement authorities to enter a third partys home to legally search for the subject of the arrest warrant holding that under payton a lesser reasonable belief standard and not probable cause is sufficient to allow officers to enter a residence to enforce an arrest warrant holding that the government was to be treated as a private person and a genuine issue of material fact existed as to whether the agents exceeded their ability to arrest because while a law enforcement officer may arrest a person without a warrant  given probable cause  a private person may only arrest someone for a crime  committed  in his presence holding that in the absence of exigent circumstances the police may not enter a private residence to make a routine arrest holding that arrest warrant permits police to enter residence of person named therein to make arrest