waived under the Act on actions for personal injury caused by a condition or use of real property if the governmental unit would be liable to the claimant according to Texas law. See id. § 101.021(2). To properly state a claim involving the “condition” of property, it is sufficient to allege that defective or inadequate property contributed to the injury. See Salcedo v. El Paso Hosp. Dist., 659 S.W.2d 30, 31-32 (Tex.1983). Gay alleged such a claim by questioning the City’s negligence in maintaining the street and sewer system, which proximately caused her fall. Accordingly, the City was not entitled to sovereign immunity. We overrule its first issue. IV. Improper Designation Of Fact Witness During Discovery In its third issue, th 31-32 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist .] 1993, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). However, we liken the circumstances in this
holding that the extension phone exemption applied to situations where a parent records his childs phone conversations from a phone extension within the parents home without any analysis of the recording partys purpose holding that a witnesss prior inconsistent statements are admissible even in the event of that witnesss actual or feigned memory loss holding sufficient location information given even in the absence of witnesss phone number holding witnesss business address even though witnesss middle name omitted enough information because party could locate witness holding in the absence of exceptional circumstances deference should be given to trial court