they could do because she was living in a community “where Jehovah’s Witnesses are treated like this.” She also stated that her family, all Jehovah’s Witnesses, remain in Poland and continue to be the recipients of “shouting and howling,” but she did not offer any specific examples of persecution of members of her family who remain in Poland. Maruska testified that when knocking on doors as a Jehovah’s Witness in the Slovak Republic, he was often chased away in a harassing and insulting manner. With respect to their withholding of removal claims, we agree that the evidence presented by petitioners, which the IJ determined was credible, nonetheless does not rise to the level of past persecution nor does it demonstrate a clear probability of future persecution. See Fatin, 12 F.3d at 1240 (<HOLDING>). As the IJ noted, while there may be hostility
holding that persecution based on being a current member of the military national police force or us embassy guard does not qualify as persecution on a protected ground holding that persecution is an extreme concept requiring more than mere harassment holding that the concept of persecution does not encompass all treatment that our society regards as unfair unjust or even unlawful or unconstitutional holding that a cause of action based on unjust enrichment does not require fault or illegality on the part of the defendant holding that to show an objectively reasonable fear of future persecution an applicant must establish that he would be singled out for persecution or that there was a pattern or practice of persecution of similarlysituated individuals