the autonomy of a competent client, but also with prevailing preferences for judicial restraint.” (internal footnote omitted) (emphasis added)). 39 . 139 S.W.3d 827 (Ky.2004). 40 . Id. at 857. 41 . Id. at 856. 42 . 550 U.S. 233, 127 S.Ct. 1654, 167 L.Ed 7 . See SCR 3.130(4.2) (“In representing a client, a lawyer shall not communicate about the subject of the representation with a party the lawyer knows to be represented by another lawyer in the matter, unless the lawyer has the consent of the other lawyer or is authorized by law to do so.”). 48 . KRS 504.090; see also Godinez, 509 U.S. at 396, 113 S.Ct. at 2685 ("A criminal defendant may not be tried unless he is competent.”). 49 . KRS 504.060(4); see also Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S. 402, 80 S.Ct. 788, 789, 4 L.Ed.2d 824 (1960) (<HOLDING>). 50 . Godinez, 509 U.S. at 398, 113 S.Ct. at
holding that to be competent under ford a prisoner must have a rational understanding of what it means to be executed holding preservation of objection at sentencing requires defendant to object with that reasonable degree of specificity which would have adequately apprised the trial court of the true basis for his objection internal quotation marks omitted holding that a criminal defendant is entitled to know the charges against him and to be tried solely upon the charges against him internal quotation marks and citation omitted holding that the test of competency is whether he the defendant has sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding  and whether he has a rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him internal quotation marks omitted holding that bankruptcy is no exception to the due process principle that one is not bound by a judgment in personam in a litigation in which he is not designated as a party to or to which he has not been made a party by service of process internal quotation marks omitted