of dismissal with prejudice based on Baker’s Table’s failure to file a motion requesting a trial of the facts pursuant to Rule 80B(d). M.R. Civ. P. 80B(d) provides in pertinent part: Motion for Trial; Waiver. If the court finds on motion that a party to a review of governmental action is entitled to a trial of the facts, the court shall order a trial to permit the introduction of evidence that does not appear in the record of governmental action and that is not stipulated. Such motion shall be filed within 30 days after the complaint is filed. The failure of a party to file said motion shall constitute a waiver of any right to a trial of the facts. [¶ 9] The purpose of Rule 80B(d) is to allow the parties to an appeal of a governmental action to augment the record presented to the 990) (<HOLDING>); Carl L. Cutler Co. v. State Purchasing Agent,
holding vague and conclusory allegations of nefarious intent and motivation are insufficient to state a claim holding that similar allegations were insufficient to state a due process claim holding vague allegations of bias insufficient holding that vague conclusory statements are insufficient holding insufficient the plaintiffs generic allegations