residences envisions one person (landlord) exchanging for periodic payments (rent) a bundle of goods and services, rights and obligations. The now classic description of this economic reality appears in Javins v. First National Realty Corp., 138 U.S.App.D.C. 369, 428 F.2d 1071, 1074, cert. denied, 400 U.S. 925, 91 S.Ct. 186, 27 L.Ed.2d 185 (1970) (footnote omitted). When American city dwellers both rich and poor, seek ‘shelter today, they seek a well known package of goods and services — a package which includes not merely walls and ceilings, but also adequate heat, light and ventilation, serviceable plumbing facilities, secure windows and doors, proper sanitation, and proper maintenance.’ ” Commonwealth v. Monumental Properties, Inc., 459 Pa. 450, 467-68, 329 A.2d 812, 820-21 (1974) (<HOLDING>) Moreover, prospective tenants today can have
holding that the delayed discovery doctrine is not applicable to actions for tortious interference with business relationships defamation or unfair and deceptive trade practices holding consumer claims under the texas deceptive trade practices act nonassignable holding that the bankruptcy court lacked jurisdiction under the rookerfeldman doctrine to hear a rescission claim brought under the pennsylvania unfair trade practices and consumer protection law after entry of a judgment in a state court mortgage foreclosure action because rescinding the loan would negate the state court judgment holding unfair trade practices and consumer protection law applicable to residential leases holding that in pennsylvania only malfeasance the improper performance of a contractual obligation raises a cause of action under the unfair trade practices and consumer protection law citation omitted and an insurers mere refusal to pay a claim which constitutes nonfeasance the failure to perform a contractual duty is not actionable