leases. Consequently, Sasil’s attorneys, Feinstein, Raiss, Kelin & Booker, L.L.C. (Feinstein), a law firm that represents property owners and management companies in summary dispossess proceedings, filed actions seeking plaintiffs’ eviction or, alternatively, payment of “rent.” Those complaints enumerated all rent, late charges, attorneys’ fees, and miscellaneous fees as “rent” owed by plaintiffs. However, in summary dispossess litigation, a landlord may not recover late charges, attorneys’ fees, and miscellaneous fees against Section 8 tenants, such as plaintiffs, and, as Feinstein acknowledges, the failure to pay those charges and fees cannot serve as a basis for eviction. See Hous. Auth. & Urban Redevelopment Agency of Atl. City v. Taylor, 171 N.J. 580, 594, 796 A.2d 193 (2002) (<HOLDING>). The complaints itemized all amounts due and
holding that a workers compensation proceeding is a legal proceeding holding that appellate deadlines are not extended by request for findings of fact and conclusions of law following summary judgment because they have no place in a summary judgment proceeding recognizing provisions of the fair housing act that forbid false statements that housing is unavailable to a person because of his race holding that federal law prohibits collection of additional rent in summary dispossess proceeding from defaulting public housing tenant holding that treble damages under the housing and rent act are remedial in nature