tried to flee, when the court inquired about the initial detention of Wiley, Robles testified, “He — he tried to walk away and I stopped him.” And though the cocaine was not within Wiley’s immediate reach, it was half a block away, in his car, and he was carrying the car’s keys. Wiley contends that the evidence was not sufficient because two defense witnesses testified that three other people had driven his car that day and because there was no evidence as to when he was last in contact with the car or how many sets of keys existed. Wiley argues that it was impossible to determine whether he had custody and control over his car, and his possession of the keys was insufficient because there was no direct evidence as to when he was last in the car. But d pp.-Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Kyte v. State, 944 S.W.2d 29, 33
holding evidence did not connect defendant to narcotics found in individual bags inside a larger bag in a car following the defendants car when the only connection was his fingerprints on outer bag and when the driver and passenger of the car in which the drugs were found exhibited nervousness and other factors indicating consciousness of guilt holding however that a followup question concerning defendants ownership of the car along with statement that the bag was found inside the car did constitute interrogation because this was likely to elicit an incriminating response holding that defendant who was a passenger in a car had joint constructive possession of drugs found next to the defendants luggage in truck of car even where she disclaimed ownership of the drugs holding that a car passenger had a legitimate expectation of privacy in his closed plastic shopping bag found on the floor of the car holding that a car passenger had a reasonable expectation of privacy in his closed brown paper bag found on the floorboard of his companions car