of recovery: unjust enrichment, breach of implied contract, conversion, and constructive fraud. She also requested that punitive damages be awarded. Bailey also sought to have the litigation certified as a class action. Following a hearing, the trial court granted her motion and ordered that the class be defined as "(alll current and former hourly employees of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (including its operating divisions Sam's Club and Wal-Mart Supercenters) in the State of Indiana during the period August 1, 1998 to present." Appendix at 61. Wal-Mart subsequently sought certification of the order for interlocutory appeal. That motion was granted; consequently, the issue of class certification is properly before this court. See Martin v. Amoco Oil Co., 696 N.E.2d 383, 385-86 (Ind.1998) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied 525 U.S. 1049, 119 S.Ct. 608,
holding that unless trial court certifies trial rule 28 determination as final under trial rule 54b it remains interlocutory holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment holding the trial court is required to make a determination on impairment of access prior to trial holding that entry of final judgment on a claim in a multiparty action pursuant to rule 54b should clearly articulate the reasons and factors underlying the decision to grant 54b certification holding that a district court order dismissing one of several claims without making an explicit determination under rule 54b is not a final decision subject to appellate review