part of the record originally filed on appeal, but Mrs. Wagner’s counsel agreed to supplementing the record with it upon proffer by appellees’ counsel. 9 . In contrast, when an attorney negligently drafts a document, such as a contract or settlement agreement, that fails to protect the client’s interests, that negligence typically is completed — the financial loss is certain — before ensuing litigation confirms the inevitable. The legal right or remedy is not in flux as it is when discovery is not complete and an issue is resolvable only by jurors who reasonably could differ on the evidence. In these legal document situations, therefore, the injury is realized at the time of the attorney's error. See, e.g., Arizona Mgmt. Corp. v. Kallof, 142 Ariz. 64, 688 P.2d 710, 713 (Ct.App.1984) (<HOLDING>); Magnuson v. Lake, 78 Or.App. 620, 717 P.2d
holding client suffered ascertainable damages when settlement agreement was entered into not when court confirmed the rights were lost holding that the plaintiffs lawsuit which was filed despite a general release in the parties settlement agreement constituted a material breach of the settlement agreement holding that a settlement agreement is not a court order and therefore a violation of the settlement agreement would not subject a party to contempt holding that a debt that was the result of debtors fraud could be exempted from discharge under  523a4 when the parties had later entered into a settlement agreement holding that a proposed settlement agreement between the debtor and its claimants would modify the confirmed plan and was prohibited by  1127b