Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616, 623-24 (6th Cir.) (government’s proffer at plea hearing sufficient to establish that firearm was “carried” when placed by the defendant in the driver’s side console of his vehicle), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 136, 136 L.Ed.2d 84 (1996). Damico nonetheless argues that because the record does not reveal precisely where the weapon was “carried,” we should vacate his conviction to enable the district court to inquire further. Damico suggests that for all we know, the weapon was merely stashed in the trunk of Abbinanti’s automobile, rather than within his reach inside the vehicle or under his clothing. According to Damico, the weapon would not have been “carried” under the firearm statute unless it was within Abbinanti’s reach. See Baker, 78 F.3d at 1247 (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Smith, 80 F.3d 215,
holding that the term carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding that carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding the phrase carries a firearm is not limited to the carrying of firearms on the person but also applies to a person who knowingly possesses firearms in a vehicle including in the locked glove compartment or trunk of a car holding that guns located in trunk of car were carried under statute holding that a defendant carries a weapon by transporting it in a car within his reach but reserving the question of whether a firearm locked in the trunk would also be carried