the jury. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that defendant has waived this contention. 1. Waiver and Forfeiture Waiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right, whereas forfeiture is the failure to make a timely assertion of a known right. People v. Phipps, 238 Ill. 2d 54, 62, 933 N.E.2d 1186, 1191 (2010); Gallagher v. Lenart, 226 Ill. 2d 208, 229, 874 N.E.2d 43, 56 (2007). In the course of representing their clients, trial attorneys may (1) make a tactical decision not to object to otherwise objectionable matters, which thereby waives appeal of such matters, or (2) fail to recognize the objectionable nature of the matter at issue, which results in procedural forfeiture. Lovell v. Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center, 397 Ill. App. 3d 890, 898, 931 N.E.2d 246, 253 (2010) (<HOLDING>). 2. Challenges for Cause and Peremptory
holding that the failure to object at trial customarily means that a party has not preserved the claim on appeal holding that because the appellant did not present to the administrative agency the argument it raised before this court the issue was not preserved and holding that even if preserved the argument failed holding that although the defendant had preserved his objection to the constitutionality of a mental state requirement he had not preserved another constitutional objection holding that a challenge to the opponents opening statement had not been preserved with justice appleton noting in a special concurrence that defense counsel made a tactical decision not to object which did not excuse the requirement to do so if the error was to be preserved for review lovell 397 ill app 3d at 902 931 ne2d at 256 appleton j specially concurring holding that a claim was not preserved for review where the defense failed to object on the specific grounds advanced on appeal