breaking into the laundry room of a hotel was not burglary of a residential structure. Id. at 1002. The court distinguished between buildings that are used exclusively as residences and those that also have commercial purposes. Id. If the location is a residence, then the statute applies so long as “the particular area entered is one that makes the building more suitable, comfortable or enjoyable for human occupancy.” Id. “If, however, ... the character of the building is commercial, then further inquiry must be made to determine the character of the use of the structure actually entered.” Id. Under this analysis, a guest room in a hotel is a residential structure, but the gift shop in that same hotel is not. Id.; see also State v. Hussain, 189 Ariz. 336, 942 P.2d 1168, 1170 (1997) (<HOLDING>); State v. Bass, 184 Ariz. 543, 911 P.2d 549,
holding that a motel room qualifies as a residential structure holding that the statute qualifies as an exemption 3 statute holding that  6103 qualifies as an exemption statute holding that rule 6e qualifies as a statute for purposes of exemption 3 holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3