the result of reasonable trial strategy.” And given that Howard has not made a contrary showing in this regard, he has failed to demonstrate that his trial counsel performed deficiently. Decided February 1, 2017. Jonathan P Waters, for appellant. K. David Cooke, Jr., District Attorney, Jason M. Wilbanks, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee. For all of the foregoing reasons, we affirm Howard’s convictions and the denial of his motion for new trial. Judgment affirmed. Reese and Bethel, JJ., concur. 1 See, e.g., Powell v. State, 310 Ga. App. 144, 144 (712 SE2d 139) (2011). 2 See former OCGA § 16-5-21 (a) (2) (1991). 3 See former OCGA § 16-5-40 (a), (b) (1994). 4 See former OCGA § 16-6-1 (a) (1994). 5 See former OCGA § 16-6-2 (a) (1994). 6 See English v. State, 30 E2d 390) (2013) (<HOLDING>); Wallace v. State, 294 Ga. App. 159, 159-60
holding that a victims outofcourt identification was sufficient to support adjudication holdingthat evidence was sufficient to support defendants convictions on rape and aggravated assault charges holdingthat defendants moving victims from their own vehicle before shooting them was sufficient to support kidnappingwithbodilyinjury charge holding that where a defendant abandoned a vehicle in a subdivision near where the victims body was found there was sufficient evidence of intent to permanently deprive the owner of the vehicle holding evidence that defendant confined five victims with intent to terrorize them was sufficient to support kidnapping conviction