court granted the wife’s motion finding that the wife had a need for attorney’s fees and costs and that the husband had the ability to pay the wife’s fees and costs. In doing so, the lower court relied, in part, on loans that the husband’s parents had made to the husband. The evidence showed that prior to the marriage, the husband borrowed $24,500 from his parents. During the marriage, the husband borrowed from his parents $12,000 in October 2000, and $22,000 in March 2001. After the parties separated, the husband borrowed a total of $72,000 from his parents within a five month period. These loans are secured by promissory notes. The husband contends that the trial court erred by relying on the loans when assessing his ability to pay the temporary attorney’s fees and costs. We DCA 1997)(<HOLDING>); Cooper v. Kahn, 696 So.2d 1186, 1188 (Fla. 3d
holding that child support arrearages may not be included in a chapter 13 plan holding that it was error for the trial court to determine the issue of child support without a child support guidelines worksheet holding that a tuition waiver is not the same as income for child support purposes holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child holding that provisions of chapter 61 are broad enough to include regular gifts in determining income for purposes of child support