8 . Under Civil Rule 13(a) the answer must include any compulsory counterclaims. A counterclaim is compulsory "if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing claim.” Alaska R. Civ. P. 13(a). Since both Goodman’s claim and Dickerson's counterclaim concern the same accident,. Dickerson's counterclaim was compulsory. 9 . Alaska R. Civ. P. 13(f). 10 . Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C., 950 P.2d 574, 576 (Alaska 1997). 11 . Andrews v. Wade & De Young, Inc., P.C., 875 P.2d 89, 91 (Alaska 1994). 12 . The record indicates that shortly after the accident Dickerson had an MRI examination that showed a herniated disk. The MRI report was made some two weeks before Dickerson's answer. 13 . Cf. Wettanen v. Cowper, 749 P.2d 362, 365 (Alaska 1988) (<HOLDING>). 14 . See 6 Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R.
holding that the statute of limitations for an attorney malpractice suit did not begin to run until the client had suffered some actual damage holding at least under the facts of the case that the statute of limitations in a medical malpractice action did not begin to run until the plaintiff secured a specific medical diagnosis holding that one need not know full extent of ones damages before limitation period begins to run as statute of limitations can be triggered at some time before full extent of damages is sustained holding that the statute of limitations for attorney malpractice may begin to run before the plaintiff knows the full extent of his damages holding that statute of limitations for malpractice begins to run when plaintiff knows or has reason to know of the alleged malpractice