financial condition, which would except the representations from section 523(a)(2)(A). Section 523(a)(2) of the Code excepts from discharge any debt “for money, property, services, or an extension, renewal, or refinancing of credit, to the extent obtained by — (A) false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s ... financial condition [.]” 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) (emphasis added). In analyzing this provision and the implications of 523(a)(2)(B), one court observed that “false oral statements made by a debtor regarding his ‘financial condition’ lead to a debt that is dischargeable, while false written statements of financial condition do not.” In re Bogdanovich, 292 F.3d 104, 107 (2nd Cir.2002). 55. The Bogdanovich court no 92) (<HOLDING>); Volk of Phila., Inc. v. Gelfand (In re
holding that representation as to financial solvency of partnership was statement of financial condition because it reflected overall economic condition of partnership holding that the phrase statement respecting the debtors  financial condition should be narrowly interpreted holding a mechanic working in a garage owned by a partnership is an employee of the partnership not the individual partner holding that absent an agreement to the contrary any partner can act as an agent of the partnership when apparently carrying on in the usual way the business of the partnership  holding that evidence of a defendants financial condition is a prerequisite to an award of punitive damages