garnishee should not be ordered to pay such amounts as are just, including the value of the property or the balance of the judgment, whichever is less, and reasonable costs and attorney fees incurred by parties as a result of the garnishee's failure. If the garnishee shows that the steps taken to secure the property were reasonable, the court may excuse the garnishee's liability in whole or in part. Id. R. 64D()(@2). $13 While "such amounts as are just" are not explicitly limited to amounts reflecting the garnishee's Hability, it is clear from the context of this provision that actual liability for damages rather than punitive sanctions is provided for in this rule. See generally Estate of Berkemeir ex rel. Nielsen v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 2004 UT 104, ¶ 13, 106 P.3d 700 (<HOLDING>); Calhoun v. State Form Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,
holding that the possibility of a mistaken understanding of the phrase preponderance of the evidence on the part of the jury is too remote to constitute plain error when counsel gave the jury an accurate explanation of the legal meaning of the phrase in his closing argument and that meaning is consistent with the common understanding of the words in the phrase recognizing that the sentence imposed should be consistent with the protection of the public holding that a phrase should be interpreted consistent with the context of the statute in which it is contained holding that the phrase statement respecting the debtors  financial condition should be narrowly interpreted holding that the phrase relates to should be interpreted to limit the breadth of erisa