to the sum of the amount described in clause (i) and the interest described in clause (ii), except that if an employer who has violated section 2615 of this title proves to the satisfaction of the court that the act or omission which violated section 2615 of this title was in good faith and that the employer had reasonable grounds for believing that the act or omission was not a violation of section 2615 of this title, such court may, in the discretion of the court, reduce the amount of the liability to the amount and interest determined under clauses (i) and (ii), respectively; and (B) for such equitable relief as may be appropriate, including employment, reinstatement, and promotion. 29 U.S.C. § 2617(a)(1). 9 . See also Cianci v. Pettibone Corp., 152 F.3d 723, 728-29 (7th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); see also Cavin v. Honda of America Mfg.,
holding that although the plaintiff has suffered no adverse employment action she may still raise a claim of discrimination based on the alleged failure reasonably to accommodate her disability holding that plaintiff had no claim under fmla because she had suffered no diminution in income and incurred no costs as a result of alleged violation holding that plaintiff had no standing because he had no intention of seeking further medical advice or treatment from defendant holding that a plaintiff had no injury in fact and consequently no standing when it had no enforceable contract right against the defendant holding that because a violation of a statute had no practical effect there was no concrete injury