show prejudice, the defendant must establish that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, the defendant would not have pled guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Kramer, 168 F.3d at 1201. B. The record supports the district court’s finding that Defendant entered her guilty plea voluntarily. Defendant was aware of the possible outcomes if she pled guilty or if she went to trial. The petition to enter the plea described the statutory minimum penalty and warned Defendant that she may receive the same sentence after a guilty plea that she would have received after a trial. Pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 11, the district court conducted a thorough inquiry at the plea hearing to insure that Defendant pled freely and voluntarily. See Jones, 168 F.3d at 1220 (<HOLDING>). At the plea hearing, Defendant agreed that
holding that defendant was responsible for the delay from the withdrawal of his guilty plea holding that a defendant must have knowledge of the likely consequences of entering the guilty plea in order for a plea to be voluntary and knowing holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea holding that a defendants guilty plea was unconditional where the guilty plea was not in writing and the government did not consent to it being conditional