In mitigation, the trial judge found no statutory mitigating circumstances had been established. The trial judge considered the following nonstatutory mitigating factors: (1) Reynolds was gainfully employed at the time the crimes were committed (little weight); (2) Reynolds exhibited appropriate courtroom behavior (little weight); (3) Reynolds had a difficult childhood (little weight). The trial court found that the evidence did not establish that Reynolds had the ability to adjust easily to prison life. Additionally, the trial court refused to consider residual or lingering doubt as a nonstatutory mitigating circumstance. The circumstances of this case are similar to other cases in which this Court has upheld the death penalty. See Butler v. State, 842 So.2d 817, 833 (Fla.2003) (<HOLDING>); Singleton v. State, 783 So.2d 970, 979
holding in asapplied challenge that death is the statutory maximum sentence for firstdegree murder holding death sentence proportional in a case where the aggravators were murder committed during the course of enumerated felony prior violent felony and hac and the following nonstatutory mitigating factors were found remorse unstable childhood positive personality traits and acceptable conduct at trial holding the death sentence proportional for the firstdegree murder conviction where only the hac aggravator was found holding that where both firstdegree and felony murder were possible bases for a murder conviction a jury instruction that suggested the jury could rely on felony murder as the predicate offense for a conviction for conspiracy to commit murder was improper because under arizona law a conviction for conspiracy to commit firstdegree murder requires a specific intent to kill holding the death sentence proportional for the firstdegree murder conviction where the aggravators included prior violent felony conviction and hac