778 (defining “liabilities” and “liable”). The Committee appears to agree with the Trustee that the term “disbursements” should not be limited to a debtor’s legal obligations; however, the Committee contends that defining “disbursements” with reference to expenses impermissibly introduces the accrual method of accounting into the calculation of quarterly fees, without regard to actual payments. On the other hand, as the Trustee points out, quarterly fees are not based on non-cash items like depreciation and are not based on the mere incurrence of an expense. Rather, it is the ultimate payment of the expense by any entity on behalf of a debt- or that is the subject of quarterly fees. See e.g. In re Charter Behavioral Health Systems, LLC, 292 B.R. 36, 47 (Bankr. D.Del.2003) (Walrath, J.) (<HOLDING>). As the court in Charter Behavioral explained,
recognizing that the term expense may be used to define disbursements even though the term is used in accrual accounting holding a technical term used in a patent document is interpreted as having the meaning that it would be given by persons experienced in the field of the invention unless it is apparent from the patent and the prosecution history that the inventor used the term with a different meaning holding that the term standing as used in fourth amendment jurisprudence  does not present a jurisdictional question holding that there can be no implied contractual term at variance with an express term of a contract holding that when a term is not defined in a contract the presumption is that the term is to be given its ordinary meaning and significance