include a legally enforceable property description. I.C. § 54-2050(1)(b). Violations of the statute are considered professional misconduct and may result in discipline and civil penalties. See I.C. §§ 54-2059 & 54-2060(10). By its own terms, the statute does not purport to govern the validity of commission agreements. Rather, it establishes a professional standard that brokers must comply with to avoid discipline. As such, CBI’s argument is unpersuasive. 8 . The district court also erred in concluding that the legal descriptions were required to be physically attached to the listing agreements at the time they were signed. This Court has not imposed such a rigid requirement in the past and finds no need to do so here. See Garfield v. Tindall, 98 Idaho 841, 844, 573 P.2d 966, 969 (1978) (<HOLDING>); Russell v. Russell, 99 Idaho 151, 154, 578
holding unenforceable a real estate contract that provided for the payment of brokerage fees to an unlicensed corporation holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur holding that the map a seller supplied to a broker at the time the brokerage contract was signed was intended by the parties to constitute the legal description in the brokerage contract holding that although the language of the contract was permissive when it said the buyer could purchase such quantities of the items listed herein as it might order or schedule and that the buyer shall have the right at any time and from time to time to cancel in whole or in part the deliveries specified and the authorizations contained in any shipping schedule given to the seller we must conclude that the contract taken as a whole is ambiguous and that further investigation as to whether the parties intended a requirements contract is required holding that it was up to the jury to decide whether the broker and seller understood the property to be sold where the listing agreement erroneously indicated a property description was attached but the seller testified the broker knew what property was to be sold