Mr. Johnson on the other hand claims that he never filed the false or misleading claim which Colonial has accused him of doing, but rather that this is a mere pretext for the actual reason he was fired. Mr. Johnson instead presented evidence showing Colonial’s dissatisfaction with his practice of helping policyholders fill out claim forms as the reason for termination and evidence of threats made by Colonial representatives to fire him if he did not discontinue this practice. Where there was a genuine issue as to a material fact, whether or not there was a breach, the claim for breach of contract was properly submitted to the jury to weigh the evidence and judge- the credibility of the witnesses. Draughon v. Harnett Cty. Bd. of Educ., 158 N.C. App. 705, 708, 582 S.E.2d 343, 345 (2003), (<HOLDING>), aff’d per curiam, 358 N.C. 137, 591 S.E.2d
holding that in determining the propriety of summary judgment credibility determinations may not be made  holding that the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility given to witness testimony holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses holding that summary judgment is not appropriate where matters of credibility and determining the weight of the evidence exist holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if the resolution of material issues depends upon credibility determinations