injuries. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of Tupelo, Inc. v. Long, 362 So.2d 182, 184 (Miss.1978) (citing Struthers Wells-Gulfport, Inc. v. Bradford, 304 So.2d 645 (Miss.1974); Tabor Motor Co. v. Garrard, 233 So.2d 811 (Miss.1970)). The court explained that, in most cases, the time of a work-related injury will be found to coincide with the accident; however, there may be instances where the extent of the injury could not reasonably have been ascertained by medical evidence at the time of the accident. Id. at 185. Accordingly, “the two-year limitation statute does not begin to run until by reasonable care and diligence it is discoverable and apparent that a compensable injury has been sustained.” Id. at 184 (citations omitted); see also Quaker Oats v. Miller, 370 So.2d 1363, 1366 (Miss.1979) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 8. Here, the ALJ determined that based on
holding the discovery rule does not require an expert opinion of causation but instead limitations begin to run when the employee discovers the nature seriousness and probable compensable character of the injury or disease holding that a notice of claim period did not begin to run until discovery of the injury holding the statute of limitations does not begin to run until the owning spouse reaches a pay status holding the time period for filling a claim does not begin to run until the claimant judged by the standard of a reasonable person recognizes the nature seriousness and probable compensable character of his injury holding the twoyear statute of limitations under iowa code section 8526 does not begin to run until the employee discovers or should discover in the exercise of diligence the nature seriousness and probable compensable character of the injury or disease