of manufacturing, distributing, or using any controlled substance.” Our cases interpreting § 856(a)(1) demonstrate that prescribing controlled substances qualifies as distribution under that statute. See United States v. Huffman, 529 Fed.Appx. 426, 430-31 (6th Cir. 2013) (concluding that the pills prescribed by a doctor in a pill mill were “attributable to Huffman’s crime of maintaining premises for the purpose of unlawfully distributing controlled substances”). This is also in line with the meaning of “distribute” under 18 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), which makes it a crime to knowingly and intentionally “manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, a controlled substance.” See United States v. Flowers, 818 F.2d 464, 468 (6th Cir. 1987) (<HOLDING>). Here, it is undisputed that Superior One and
holding  1227a2bi limits the meaning of controlled substance for removal purposes to the substances controlled under  802 holding that the legislature intended for multiple punishments when a defendant makes a single act of possessing different types of controlled substances holding that congress intended that a person could violate section 841a1 without actually distributing the controlled substances but only by writing a prescription for their distribution holding that conduct designated as a felony under state law but as only a misdemeanor under the controlled substances act does not qualify as an aggravated felony holding that defendants ability to pay may be considered in assessing penalty under controlled substances act