in an attempt to establish diversity jurisdiction in connection wit WL 3535, at *2 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 11, 1991) ("The district courts have inherent authority to enforce professional rules of conduct.... The rules of professional responsibility are applicable in arbitration proceedings. Courts in Pennsylvania and New York have applied such rules in compulsory court-annexed arbitration hearings and in private contractual commercial arbitration hearings.”) (citing Gwertzman v. Gwertzman, Pfeffer, Tokar & Lefkowitz, No. 87 Civ. 6824, 1988 WL 138149 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 1988) (disqualifying counsel from representing a party in arbitration based on New York Code of Professional Responsibility)). Cf. Bidermann Indus. Licensing v. Avmar N.V., 173 A.D.2d 401, 570 N.Y.S.2d 33, 33 (1st Dep't 1991) (<HOLDING>). 43 . See, e.g., Hempstead Video, Inc. v.
holding that an arbitration in accordance with aaa rules is a binding arbitration holding that completed arbitration pending appeal mooted district courts order directing arbitration recognizing that an action at common law can be maintained on an arbitration award rendered under the parties submission that does not comply with the arbitration statute holding that where an arbitration agreement between an employer and employee does not specifically provide for the handling of arbitration costs california courts should interpret the arbitration agreement  as providing  that the employer must bear the arbitration forum costs holding that state courts can disqualify counsel in an arbitration