entity must hold fee simple title in the property in order for this exception to apply. Even though strict construction of statutory provisions waiving sovereign immunity is required, it is also true that words in statutes are to be considered in their plain and ordinary meaning in order to ascertain the intent of the lawmakers. The statute refers to “a public entity’s property” and the definition of property suggests more than a fee simple ownership. Webster’s New Collegiate Dictionary defines, property as “something owned or possessed.” Under the facts of the present case, a definition of the term “public entity’s property” includes the exclusive control and possession of a polling place. Id. (citations omitted); see also Tillison v. Boyer, 939 S.W.2d 471, 473 (Mo.App. E.D.1996) (<HOLDING>). ' Following Farrington, our courts have
holding where the commonwealth is not in possession of property in question petition for return of property is moot holding that ijnjuries caused by the condition of a public entitys property  clearly refers to ownership of a property interest which allows a public entity to control the property holding that if property is not property1 of the public entity then the public entity cannot be subject to suit under the dangerous condition waiver holding that property of a public entity includes having exclusive control and possession of  property holding that a public entitys property refers to the public entity that owns the property where a dangerous condition exists