departure from the guidelines. 31 . Hersh also argues that (1) the evidence regarding the receipt and possession of child pornography counts was insufficient, (2) the district court abused its discretion by admitting pedophilia-propensity evidence in violation of Fed.R.Evid. 404(b), and (3) the district court erred by applying the "promoting prostitution” guideline to several of the counts. We can find no merit in any of these arguments and dispose of them briefly. First, the evidence introduced at trial plainly established that Hersh knowingly received and possessed the images, that the images were received and possessed through interstate commerce, that the images portrayed real minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and that Hersh was aware of such. See Kent, 175 F.3d at 873 (<HOLDING>). Appellant recently filed supplemental
holding that the courts role is to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing summary judgment to draw all reasonable inferences in favor of that party and to eschew credibili ty assessments holding that in reviewing sufficiency of the evidence claims we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the government and draw all reasonable inferences and credibility choices in favor of the jurys verdict holding that we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party holding that when reviewing a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence all evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the government holding that an appellate court considers all evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict and grants the state all reasonable inferences