of White’s statement did not contribute to the verdict obtained. Accordingly, the decision of the trial court is AFFIRMED. SHORT, J., concurs. 1 . Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). 2 . The State also cites both White's and the investigators’ testimony stating the initial questioning did not begin until "around midnight,” which coincides with the timing listed on the signed Miranda rights waiver form (11:55 P.M.). 3 . 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908 (1964) (outlining the procedure for a pre-trial hearing to determine the voluntariness and admissibility of a defendant's contested statement). 4 . 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). 5 . Cf. Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 310, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991) (<HOLDING>). 6 . The KFC was closed for the night. 7 .
holding that admission of evidence is harmless if it is cumulative to other legitimately admitted evidence that establishes a defendants guilt beyond a reasonable doubt holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt recognizing that where the error involved defies analysis by harmless error standards or the data is insufficient to conduct a meaningful harmless error analysis then the error will not be proven harmless beyond a reasonable doubt holding the erroneous admission of an involuntary confession is subject to a harmless error analysis when the defendants guilt is established beyond a reasonable doubt holding that harmless beyond a reasonable doubt analysis not applicable in habeas cases