(internal quotation and citation omitted). In this case, Mr. Charles was convicted under 18 U.S.C. § 751(a), which prohibits the generic crime of “escaping] or attempting] to escape from the custody of the Attorney General,” and includes failing to return to custody. 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). The district court apparently considered the plea agreement, which specified that Mr. Charles had escaped the custody of a halfway house, but the court was without the benefit of the Supreme Court’s decision in Chambers. Before Chambers, the categorization of an escape conviction was well-settled in this Circuit, because we held that all escape convictions were “crimes of violence” under § 4B1.2. See United States v. Gosling, 39 F.3d 1140, 1142 (10th Cir.1994) (“Every escape scenario is a powder keg.”) (<HOLDING>); see also United States v. Springfield, 196
holding felony escape in north carolina to be crime of violence under acca because escape presents risk of injury to others holding walkaway escape under north dakota statute a crime of violence holding prior to chambers that a walkaway escape is categorically a violent felony holding that walkaway from community treatment center conviction was a crime of violence consistent with chambers holding that an escape from custody under minnesota law is a crime of violence