the independence .and vigor of Americans who grow up and live in this relatively permissive, often disputatious, society. Tinker, 393 U.S. at 508-09, 89 S.Ct. 733. The Court then further explained that: In our system, state-operated schools may not be enclaves of totalitarianism. School officials do not possess absolute authority over their students. Students in school as well as out of school are ‘persons’ under our Constitution. They are possessed of fundamental rights which the State must respect, just as they themselves must respect their obligations to the State. In our system, students may not be regarded as closed-circuit recipients of only that which the State chooses to communicate. They may not be confined to the expression of those sentiments that a 1252, 1258 (N.D.Ga.1980) (<HOLDING>); Banks v. Bd. of Public Instr., 314 F.Supp.
holding that a principal did not impinge students first amendment rights by censoring articles in a high school newspaper holding that a teacher was unjustified in censoring an article in the school newspaper because it was inconceivable that the use of the word damn one time in the article would have caused material and substantial interference with school activities holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials holding that a school may not prohibit expressive activity unless there are facts which might reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities holding that a school district was not liable for sexual molestation of plaintiffs daughter by a teacher even though the acts occurred on school property and during school hours