Inc., 220 Ga. App. at 360 (2) (“If a foreclosure advertisement is not defective as a matter of law, defects in it will prevent confirmation only if the factfinder determines those defects ‘chilled’ bidding and caused an inadequate selling price.”). 9 OCGA § 15-6-67 (b) (2) (A); see also Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 180-7-.02 (2) (“Any description written for conveyance or other purpose... shall include the general location of the tract or lot with sufficient accuracy such that the tract can be readily located on the ground. The land lot, district, section, militia district number (in Headright Grant areas), city (if known to be within the city limits) and county shall be called out in said description.”). 10 See Deljoo v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc., 284 Ga. 438, 440 (668 SE2d 245) (2008) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. Wilkinson, 208 Ga. 489, 493-94 (2)
holding that words which expressly refer to adequate legal description provide nucleus of description that is legally sufficient for statute of frauds holding that description was sufficiently detailed holding in the context of a conveyance that it is only when a description is manifestly too meager imperfect or uncertain to serve as adequate means of identification that the court can adjudge the description insufficient as a matter of law punctuation omitted holding that witness had an independent basis to support incourt identification where the description made prior to any pretrial identification was substantially an accurate description of the defendant holding that under the statute of frauds a description will be insufficient as a matter of law if it is indefinite to the degree that no particular tract of land is identified nevertheless a description which is vague will be sufficient if its precise location may be determined upon competent parol evidence