be accepted as substitutes for such record; and docket entries, affidavits, and other like evidence can neither change nor enlarge judgments or orders as entered in the minutes of the court. Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co., 134 Tex. 377, 110 S.W.2d 561, 566 (1937). “|T]he judge’s notes are for his own convenience and that of the clerk making the entries, and form no part of the record.” Stark v. Miller, 63 Tex. 164, 165 (1885); see also, e.g., Emerald Oaks Hotel/Conference Center, Inc. v. Zardenetta, 776 S.W.2d 577, 578 (Tex.1989, orig. proceeding) (“A trial court’s oral pronouncement and docket entry reinstating a cause is not an acceptable substitute for the written order required by [Tex.R.Civ.P. 165a(3) ].”); Clark & Co. v. Giles, 639 S.W.2d 449, 450 (Tex.1982, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>); McCormack v. Guillot, 597 S.W.2d 345, 346
holding that oral pronouncement and docket entry granting motion for new trial could not substitute for the written order required by texrcivp 329b since amended holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement holding that the trial courts oral pronouncement must conform to the written judgment holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls holding that oral pronouncement prevailed over the written order