CURIAM. Appellant, Larry Williams, challenges the trial court’s denial of his motions for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the trial court’s denial of Appellant’s motions with the exception of Appellant’s claim that his convictions for burglary of a structure and for burglary of a structure with an assault violate double jeopardy. This Court has held that double jeopardy was violated when the defendant was convicted of two counts of burglary of the same structure. See Henry v. State, 707 So.2d 370, 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998) (<HOLDING>). However, under some circumstances multiple
holding that consecutive sentences imposed on multiplieitous counts  two counts of conspiracy for one drug smuggling enterprise  violated double jeopardy clause holding larceny conviction was a violation of bar against double jeopardy where defendant was acquitted of larceny at first trial but at retrial was convicted of larceny and burglary holding that the double jeopardy clause was not violated by two convictions arising from the same criminal episode because the crimes of attempted burglary and possession of burglary tools each had an element the other did not and were thus separate crimes holding that the prohibition against double jeopardy was violated when the defendant was convicted of two counts of burglary of a structure for entering a trailer and for entering the curtilage of surrounding trailers holding that convictions for two counts of possession of one quantity of cocaine constituted double jeopardy and fundamental error reversing one possession conviction and remanding for resentencing