1981). 14 . See Ahtna, Inc. v. Ebasco Constructors, Inc., 894 P.2d 657, 663 (Alaska 1995). 15 . See id. 16 . Id. 17 . The trial court did not make a finding of fact regarding the date of accrual of the Exxon claim, therefore, it is impossible to determine from the record presented on appeal whether a fiduciary duty of disclosure arose during the term of the venture-as was the case in Ahtna. 18 . See In re S & D Foods, Inc., 144 B.R. 121, 160 (D.Colo.1992) ("fiduciary obligations continue after dissolution of a partnership or joint venture and until all partnership or joint venture affairs are completely wound-up"); Leff v. Gunter, 33 Cal.3d 508, 189 Cal.Rptr. 377, 658 P.2d 740, 744 (1983); Larry Karchmar, Ltd. v. Nevoral, 302 Ill.App.3d 951, 236 Ill.Dec. 378, 707 N.E.2d 223, 227 (1999) (<HOLDING>); Greenberg v. Alter Co., 255 Towa 899, 124
holding joint venturer owes fiduciary duty to former joint venturer until profits distributed holding that minority partners claim against the majority partner for breach of fiduciary duty was not barred under the gist of the action doctrine because pennsylvania law imposes a fiduciary duty that is separate and distinct from the particular contractual obligations contained in the joint venture agreement holding that an attorney owes a fiduciary duty to persons though not strictly clients who he knows or should know rely on him in his professional capacity holding that an attorney for a debtor owes a general fiduciary duty to preserve the bankruptcy estate holding that an agent owes a fiduciary duty to his principal