if any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Dent, 149 F.3d 180, 187 (3d Cir. 1998) (internal citations and quotations omitted). Given the police officer’s testimony, the jury clearly had a reasonable basis for finding that Steplight possessed the firearm, the only non-stipulated element of the charged crime. Accordingly, we agree that there is no non-frivolous basis for claiming that the evidence was insufficient. Second, the District Court did not err in refusing to grant the motion to suppress, which argued that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Step-light’s car and had no right to order him to step out of his car. See United States v. Delfin-Colina, 464 F.3d 392, 397 (3d Cir. 2006) (<HOLDING>). Steplight acknowledged during his testimony
holding that reasonable suspicion standard applies to routine traffic stops holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law holding detection of alcohol on a drivers breath during a routine traffic stop gave rise to reasonable suspicion holding random traffic stops for license and registration checks are contrary to fourth amendment holding this framework applies whether the traffic stop is based on probable cause or reasonable suspicion