the child can, if necessary, be protected”)- Instead, to determine if a child’s statements were taken in preparation for a legal proceeding, we look to the “totality of the circumstances to determine whether the interviews were primarily to investigate the allegations or primarily to prepare a legal action against the accused.” Id. The “factual circumstances as interpreted by the trial court must govern,” and we will not disturb the court’s findings unless they are clearly erroneous. State v. Blackburn, 162 Vt. 21, 24, 643 A.2d 224, 226 (1993). ¶ 23. The interview here was plainly investigatory. Z.S. had not disclosed any abuse before he was interviewed for the first time, nor did the investigators possess any knowledge that he had been abused. See Fisher, 167 Vt. at 42, 702 A.2d at 45 (<HOLDING>); Blackburn, 162 Vt. at 25, 643 A.2d at 226
holding that where an action is brought by the debtors at the initial proceeding the appeal of that action is not a continuing proceeding against the debtors holding that when no appeal was taken from an initial application for postconviction relief the claims were fully and finally determined in that previous proceeding holding a party to be an initial transferee because she was given legal title to the funds holding that statements gathered during a childs initial interview with dcf and police which was held within a week of the initial disclosure to dcf were not taken in preparation for a legal proceeding holding because an initial order contemplated the subsequent entry of a judgment the initial order was not considered a final adjudication