the hourly rates applied by the district court for the AC & B attorneys were as follows: Joaquin Arriola — $200.00; Mark Co-wan — $195.00; Anita Arriola — $175.00. The hourly rate applied for the local ACLU lawyer, Carl Varady, was $150.00. 2 . Those hourly rates were as follows: Lynn Pal-trow — $241.00; Rachel Pine — $241.00; Simon Heller — $25.00 (for services which could have been performed by someone of less skill and knowledge) and $135.00; Louise Melling— $135.00; Ellen Goetj — $100.00; and Andrew Dwyer — $80.00. 3 . As our colleague has so aptly stated in the past: Appellate judges should be aware of their limitations. They can guide and review, but they cánnot run the show. United Sta L.Ed.2d 132 (1993); Shipes v. Trinity Industries, 987 F.2d 311, 323 (5th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 991, 114 S.Ct. 548,
holding that dna test results warranted a new trial of a postconviction petitioner who was convicted of rape and kidnaping holding that sentence enhancement for crimes committed against law enforcement officers may be applied when information charges qualifying offense information does not need to recite enhancement statute holding that in a statutory fee case the results obtained factor was already subsumed in the lodestar and that results multipliers should be awarded only in some cases of exceptional success recognizing that enhancement for results obtained may be warranted holding that under  1988 consideration of the results obtained relative to the relief requested is required