ability to offer both under the residual exception. 39 M.J. 158. In Farley, which involved theories of admissibility identical to the present case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit would have admitted a child/victim’s out-of-court statements to a psychologist under the medical diagnosis and treatment exception, albeit on alternate grounds, in addition to the child’s statements to her mother under the residual exception. 992 F.2d at 1125. In Spotted War Bonnet, the Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit held that extra-judicial statements made by both ehildren/victims to a state social worker and to a clinical psychologist at different times were admissible under the residual exception even though both victims testified at trial. 882 F.2d at 1363-64. See also Clark (<HOLDING>); United States v. Dunlap, 25 M.J. 89
holding heroin overdose victims statement to police identifying her source admissible under residual exception in addition to admission by accused that he had supplied victim holding childvictims statement to police investigator admissible under residual exception as well as identical corroborating statement to babysitter holding ehildvictims testimony at pretrial investigation admissible under residual exception in addition to doctors testimony under medical treatment exception holding statement by childvictim to teachers aide admissible under residual exception in addition to statements to school nurse and pediatrician under medical treatment exception holding childvictims statement to babysitter admissible un der residual exception in addition to statement to physician under medical treatment exception