dealing, and because State Farm was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, the judgment entered pursuant to a directed verdict in the district court is AFFIRMED. IT IS SO ORDERED. SOSA, Senior J„ and STOWERS, J., concur. 1 . See Archuleta v. Pina, 86 N.M. 94, 95, 519 P.2d 1175, 1176 (1974); Sanchez v. Gomez, 57 N.M. 383, 387, 259 P.2d 346, 348 (1953); Morris v. Cartwright, 57 N.M. 328, 332, 258 P.2d 719, 722 (1953); Cavazos v. Geronimo Bus Lines, 56 N.M. 624, 627, 247 P.2d 865, 866 (1952); Sandoval v. Cortez, 88 N.M. 170, 173-74, 538 P.2d 1192, 1195 (Ct.App.1975); Brown v. Hall, 80 N.M. 556, 557, 458 P.2d 808, 809 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 80 N.M. 607, 458 P.2d 859 (1969). 2 . See, e.g., Petersen v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n of Puerto Rico, Inc., 617 F.Supp. 1039, 1042 (D.V.I.1985) (<HOLDING>); Mitford v. De Lasala, 666 P.2d 1000, 1007
recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract recognizing an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by all parties in the performance of a contract for the sale of real estate recognizing that evidence of breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing may support punitive damages holding implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing found in some commercial contracts does not extend to atwill employment contracts holding that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is limited to performance under a contract