of the [arresting] officers in taking steps to assure themselves that the house in which a suspect is being, or has just been, arrested is not harboring other persons who are dangerous and who could unexpectedly launch an attack” and described two types of searches that might immediately follow an arrest and for which a warrant was not required. 494 U.S. at 333-34, 110 S.Ct. 1093. First, the officers’ interest in their own safety justifies a search “incident to the arrest ... as a precautionary matter and without probable cause or reasonable suspicion, ... [of] closets and other spaces immediately adjoining the place of arrest from which an attack could be immediately launched.” Id. at 334, 110 S.Ct. 1093. Second, the officers can perform a further protective sweep beyond Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Lauter, 57 F.3d 212, 216-17
holding that a defendants sister could consent to a search of only the common areas of their shared house and her own bedroom and explicitly stating that the sister could not consent to search the defendants bedroom because the defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in her own bedroom holding that a mother had apparent authority to consent to a search of her adult sons bedroom including a closed vinyl bag found in the bedroom holding that buie permitted a search of a small bedroom a few feet down the hallway from the bedroom in which the suspect was arrested holding that child cannot consent to search of parents bedroom holding that buie permitted a search of an open storage unit when the suspect was arrested immediately outside