find the slip and fall cases to be controlling with respect to medical malpractice actions. We do find persuasive the cited medical malpractice cases where the physician was not held to be negligent as a matter of law. For example, it was not negligence as a matter of law when a dentist slipped while drilling on a patient’s tooth, Neal v. Wilmoth, 342 S.W.2d 701 (Ky.1961), or when a dentist left a broken fragment of a tooth embedded in a patient’s jaw, which could have been easily discovered, Butts v. Watts, 290 S.W.2d 777 (Ky.1956). On the other hand, Appellee contends that the present case is analogous to medical malpractice actions where a foreign object is left in a patient’s body during surgery. With respect to retained foreign bodies, this Court held 60, 34 S.W.2d 929 (Ky.1931)
holding the employee was clearly within the zone of her employment even though not at her work station because she was on the universitys premises the campus holding that notice provided by plaintiff that alleged she  was injured  as result of fall was insufficient as matter of law and precluded invocation of savings clause holding that a customer was not guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law even though she knew the oil was on the floor before her slip and fall holding that a patron was not guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law for slipping while leaving a parking lot via the wrong aisle holding that defendants bear the burden of proving contributory negligence by a preponderance of the evidence