the record is expunged ...” Hammon v. Ward, 466 F.3d 919, 923 n. 4 (10th Cir.2006). As explained by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Ap peals, in such a matter, “the [trial] court retains jurisdiction and only a conditional order, not a judgment and sentence, is entered.” Nguyen v. State, 772 P.2d 401, 403 (Okla.Crim.App.1989), overruled on other grounds by Gonseth v. State, 871 P.2d 51, 54 (Okla.Crim.App.1994). Thus under Oklahoma law, a deferred sentence generally “is not a conviction until such time as the trial court pronounces judgment and sentence.” Belle v. State, 516 P.2d 551, 552 (Okla.Crim.App.1973). See Crews v. Shelter General Ins. Co., 393 F.Supp.2d 1170, 1176 (W.D.Okla.2005); U.S. v. Turner, 497 F.2d 406, 407 (10th Cir.1974); U.S. v. Stober, 604 F.2d 1274 (10th Cir.1979) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Parker, 604 F.2d 1327, 1329
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony of a law enforcement agent who had no knowledge or opinion about the firearm identified in the indictment but stated that there are not and have never been any manufacturers of revolvers in oklahoma  and any revolver used during a carjacking in oklahoma necessarily travelled in interstate commerce holding that defendant who had pled guilty in oklahoma state court pursuant to the oklahoma deferred judgment act had not been convicted in the oklahoma proceedings for purposes of usc  922h prohibiting the receipt of a firearm by one who has been convicted of a felony holding that the right to counsel in probation revocation proceedings is not absolute where the defendant has been convicted of or has admitted to committing a crime holding that where a witness had been convicted seventeen years earlier but had been given probation and had not been confined the date of the conviction controlled holding that a statute imposing a one dollar court cost for law enforcement on every person convicted of a crime was not a violation of the separation of powers doctrine because it is reasonable that one convicted of a crime should be made to share in the improvement of agencies that society has had to employ in defense against the very acts for which he has been convicted