exception). Based on the idea that detention prior to trial is an exception, the Bail Reform Act, title 18, section 3145(b) of the United States Code (“Section 3145(b)”) provides that a person who has been ordered to be detained pending trial by a magistrate judge may move for revocation or amendment of the detention order in the court with original jurisdiction over the matter. 18 U.S.C. § 3145(b). A. Standard of review “When the district court acts on a motion to revoke or amend a magistrate’s pretrial detention order, the district court acts de novo and must make an independent determination of the proper pretrial detention or conditions for release.” United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 580, 585-86 (5th Cir. 1992); cf. United States v. Delker, 757 F.2d 1390, 1394 (3d Cir. 1985) (<HOLDING>). Under this standard, “a district court should
holding 28 usc  636 did not require a hearing for de novo review of a magistrates findings holding that the proper review for the trial courts application of the law is de novo recognizing de novo standard of review holding that the error caused by the magistrate judges unauthorized postjudgment order was cured by the district courts later de novo review of the magistrates findings and conclusions holding that section 3145b contemplates de novo review by the district court of a magistrates order for bail pending trial