(1995). 14 . The district court properly modified the specific finding of the AU on this point. The district court agreed with the ALJ that Leggett could be a cashier, but that there was only substantial evidence to support a finding that Leggett can be a cashier in a sedentary position, and not in a "light work" position as the ALJ held. 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g) (West Supp.1995) ("The court shall have the power to enter ... a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the [Commissioner]”.). 15 . Scott v. Heckler, 770 F.2d 482, 487 (5th Cir.1985). 16 . Paul, 29 F.3d at 211. 17 . Id.; see also Greenspan, 38 F.3d at 237. 18 . Greenspan, 38 F.3d at 237. 19 . Pierre v. Sullivan, 884 F.2d 799, 802 (5th Cir.1989) (per curiam). 20 . Id. at 802-03. 21 . See Jones, 829 F.2d at 526 (<HOLDING>). 22 . Latham v. Shalala, 36 F.3d 482, 484 (5th
holding that the alj did not err by not ordering psychological tests when the claimant was merely emotionally upset about his condition holding that trial court did not err holding that the alj did not err in discounting a claimants reports of pain where they were not supported by the medical record holding that the plaintiff had not placed his mental condition in controversy because he was not complaining of any definable psychological symptoms holding that a bankruptcy court did not err in ordering repayment over five years