affirmed, 905 P.2d 289, 295 (Utah 1995). In this case, once the officer discovered the driver was not the registered owner of the vehicle, but that a woman was, the officer had a legitimate purpose in ascertaining whether or not defendant was the owner. See State v. Johnson, 805 P.2d 761, 764 (Utah 1991) (finding officer, after discovering neither driver nor passenger were registered owner of vehicle, should have exercised right to inquire about registered owner). 2 . Défendant relies on unreasonable detention cases that are factually distinguishable from the case before us. In each of those cases, the detention was unreasonable because the officer did not have an articulable suspicion of criminal activity as to the defendant. See State v. Johnson, 805 P.2d 761, 764 (Utah 1991) (<HOLDING>); State v. Schlosser, 774 P.2d 1132, 1135 (Utah
holding warrants check on passenger before officer inquired as to registered owner of suspected stolen car was unreasonable because officer had not formed reasonable articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in any criminal activity holding officer had reasonable suspicion of criminal activity necessary to support traffic stop where officer received dispatch that defendant committed disorderly conduct and record check showed parked truck was registered to defendant recognizing that police officer may stop a suspect if the officer has a reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that criminal activity may be afoot holding defendants nervousness in part presented officer with reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity holding that an officer can stop an individual if the officer has reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is underfoot