Worth 1992, pet. ref'd); Petty v. State, 696 S.W.2d 635, 639 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1985, no pet.). 15 . See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 27, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1883, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). 16 . See d 376 (2006). 20 . United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 510-11 (5th Cir.2004); Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 245; McQuarters v. State, 58 S.W.3d 250, 256 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). 21 . Terry, 392 U.S. at 21, 88 S.Ct. at 1880; Garcia v. State, 43 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex.Crim.App.2001); McQuarters, 58 S.W.3d at 255. 22 . Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124, 120 S.Ct. 673, 676, 145 L.Ed.2d 570 (2000). 23 . Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 242; Crockett v. State, 803 S.W.2d 308, 311 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 24 . Garcia, 43 S.W.3d at 530; McQuarters, 58 S.W.3d at 255. 25 . See Mohmed, 977 S.W.2d at 628 (<HOLDING>); Smith, 840 S.W.2d at 692; Petty, 696 S.W.2d
holding that reasonable suspicion existed based on defendants nervousness expired drivers license and suspicious story regarding travel plans holding it was reasonable for a trooper to issue a written warning verify the defendant license and registration information and ask preliminary questions about travel plans because the trooper saw the defendants registration tag displayed in an unlawful manner even after he approached the vehicle holding that department of transportation did not have control over an uninsured motorists vehicle as intended by the personal property exception to sovereign immunity where it failed to physically obtain custody of motorists drivers license and allowed him to possess a license plate holding that officers may question motorists about their license registration and travel plans holding that department of transportation did not have control of motorists drivers license because although the department of transportation may have had a duty to recall the motorists license this authority to revoke does not involve physical possession or actual control sufficient to bring the license within the ambit of the personal property exception to sovereign immunity