fees incurred by a party in previous litigation are not recoverable against the present adversary in new, current litigation, but holding that necessary and reasonable attorney's fees and costs, even though expended and incurred in previous litigation, can be recovered as proper damages in a later suit based on tortious interference of contract, where the natural and proximate results and consequences of prior wrongful acts had involved a plaintiff in litigation with and against third parties and other parties); Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. Holmes, 842 S.W.2d 335, 341 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1992, writ denied) (recognizing that a recoveiy of attorney's fees based upon equitable principles can exist); Baja Energy, Inc. v. Ball, 669 S.W.2d 836, 839 (Tex.App. — Eastland 1984, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Powell v. Narried, 463 S.W.2d 43, 46
holding that on the basis of usages and principles of equity plaintiff was entitled to recover his attorneys fees to defend prior lawsuit because the expenses were caused by the defendants wrongful act holding in a false imprisonment action that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover attorneys fees unless the services were to secure his discharge from the illegal restraint holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award holding that plaintiffs equal protection conspiracy claim which was the basis of the lawsuit was groundless and thus defendants were entitled to an award of attorneys fees recognizing that where a plaintiff failed to perform because of the defendants breach the plaintiff could recover damages caused by the defendants breach