Gulf Coast Fans, Inc. v. Midwest Elecs. Imps., Inc., 740 F.2d 1499, 1512 (11th Cir.1984). Plaintiff alleges that Wong and W & B are jointly liable. Therefore, an inconsistent judgment might result if Wong successfully defended on the merits while default judgment was entered against W & B. Furthermore, Plaintiffs Complaint includes counts against Wong individually, and other counts against both Wong and W & B, but no counts against W & B alone on which the Court would be able to grant default judgment without consideration of Wong’s defense. Because consideration of Wong’s defenses is intertwined with the liability of W & B, and because of the potentially inconsistent results described above, Plaintiffs motion for entry of default judgment against W & B is stayed. Frow, 82 U.S. at 554 (<HOLDING>). As noted above, the joint liability
holding that when a contract is signed by one party but not the other the manifestation of consent by the nonsigning party is sufficient to bind that party holding that in a situation where the police have probable cause to arrest one party and reasonably mistake a second party for that first party the arrest of the second party is still a valid arrest recognizing default judgment not appropriate when joint liability alleged and one party still defending holding that a trial court may enter summary judgment for a nonmoving party under appropriate circumstances holding that successful party is one who is the ultimate prevailing party in the litigation