incident occur on, in, or over navigable waters, Victory Carriers, Inc. v. Law, 404 U.S. 202, 205, 92 S.Ct. 418, 30 L.Ed.2d 383 (1971), and 2) a significant relationship between the incident and traditional maritime activity. Executive Jet Aviation, Inc. v. City of Cleveland, 409 U.S. 249, 268, 93 S.Ct. 493, 34 L.Ed.2d 454 (1972). With admiralty jurisdiction comes the application of substantive maritime law. E. River S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc., 476 U.S. 858, 864, 106 S.Ct. 2295, 90 L.Ed.2d 865 (1986). Furthermore, courts have found admiralty law applies in personal injury and contract disputes between passengers injured on cruise ships and the cruise ship companies. See e.g., Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 589, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991) (<HOLDING>); Keefe v. Bahama Cruise Line, 867 F.2d 1318,
holding that forumselection clauses are generally enforceable and a party attempting to show that such a clause should not be enforced bears a heavy burden holding that remand to state court was appropriate where mandatory forumselection clause placed venue in a specified county of the state holding that a forumselection clause was enforceable in a suit between injured passengers and the cruise line holding that a forumselection clause was mandatory because it provided for exclusive jurisdiction and venue in a particular court holding that the initial interpretation of a contractual forumselection clause must be made by the tribal court