company’s affairs."); Murdock, supra note 4, at 470 ("The most common form of alternative remedy is the buy-out of the minority shareholder.”). 31 .The remedy of receivership is harsh or drastic when compared to other remedies such as compelling dividends or a buyout because it replaces the shareholders' chosen managers with court-chosen managers. 443 S.W.3d at 903; Balias, 748 S.W.2d at 257. But this does not mean that even a receivership for dissolution will cause the corporation to cease to be a going concern. The majority shareholders may well purchase the corporation from the receiver, essentially buying out the minority shareholder. 32 . Murdock, supra note 4, at 426. 33 . See Texarkana Coll. Bowl, Inc. v. Phillips, 408 S.W.2d 537, 539-40 (Tex.Civ.App.-Texar-kana 1966, no writ) (<HOLDING>). 34 . The Court believes the Model Act compels
holding that majority shareholders had legitimate business reasons for terminating a shareholder which included the reason that the shareholder was not working well with other employees holding failure to exercise discretion is abuse of discretion holding that unless a shareholder can show personal cause of action and personal injury claims for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty belong to the corporation and not the shareholder holding that a shareholder was not entitled to a remedy for oppression because the directors decisions were not inconsistent with the honest exercise of business judgment and discretion holding that shareholder could not prevail on breachoffiduciaryduty claim against other shareholder because alleged mishandling of funds did not result in any injury to the corporation