S.Ct. 2727, 41 L.Ed.2d 842 (1974), which involved the conduct of sewing a peace symbol onto an American flag, the Court devised a two-part test 'for determining whether conduct has risen to the level of protected expression under the First Amendment. The test asks (1) whether the actor intended to convey a particularized message; and (2) whether the conduct was likely to be understood as communication by the observers, given the surrounding circumstances. See id. at 410-11, 94 S.Ct. 2727. Applying the Spence test here, the plaintiffs’ free speech claim fails. The plaintiffs have not presented evidence to indicate that by attending and cheering at the game, they intended to communicate a particularized message that o y School District, 393 U.S. 503, 89 S.Ct. 733, 21 L.Ed.2d 731 (1969) (<HOLDING>); Aubrey v. Cincinnati, 815 F.Supp. 1100
holding that students action wearing black armbands was expressive conduct entitled to first amendment protection holding that a school may not prohibit expressive activity unless there are facts which might reasonably have led school authorities to forecast substantial disruption of or material interference with school activities holding that wearing black armband to school to protest vietnam war was expressive conduct holding that participating in community service is not expressive conduct holding that a public school may not without evidence  of substantial disruption punish students for wearing armbands protesting the vietnam war