contravention of the provisions thereof, may apply to said Commission by petition which shall briefly state the facts, whereupon a statement of the complaint thus made shall be forwarded by the Commission to such common carrier, who shall be called upon to satisfy the complaint or to answer the same in writing within a reasonable time to be specified by the Commission.” 47 U.S.C. § 208. Boomer could have filed a complaint with the FCC under Section 207 or Section 208, arguing that the arbitration clause violates Section 201(b) because it is unjust or unreasonable. Cf. In re Long Distance, 831 F.2d at 631 (concluding that FCC has primary jurisdiction to determine if a term and condition of a long-distance service contract constitute an unreasonable practice); Metro East, 294 F.3d at 927 (<HOLDING>). However, Boomer did not pursue this course of
holding that the trial court was without authority to set aside entry of default on motion to set aside default judgment holding an entire arbitration clause is void and arbitration cannot be compelled where contract contained unconscionable clause and has a nonseverability clause recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict holding that judicial enforcement of a promise or contract to provide service on terms not contained in filed tariff is precluded by the filedrate doctrine holding that fcc possesses exclusive authority to set aside an arbitration clause contained in a filed tariff