and sport hunters somewhere, maybe everywhere, are tuning in. And for purposes of causation, these hunters must be tuning in for the first time because there is no dispute that, as a matter of federal law, it has long been legal to hunt captive-bred members of the three antelope species in the United States. Next, at least some hunters who receive the signal will journey to North Africa to search for one of the small number of scimitar-horned oryx, ad-dax and dama gazelle that live in the wild— all because these hunters picked up the signal. This is just so much speculation. 2006 WL 6198320, at *6. 9 . Even if the plaintiff maintained standing to bring suit, Section 127 is valid under the Constitution. The plaintiff argues that under United States v. Kl .3d 1170 (9th Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, where there is ambiguity regarding
holding that ejxcept in matters governed by the federal constitution or by acts of congress the law to be applied in any case is the law of the state holding that an unconstitutional act of congress has no legal effect holding that where congress has directed the agency to issue a rule without regard to any other provision of statute or regulation that applies to issuance of such rule  congress has amended the law and does not offend the constitution holding that the other source of law might be a moneymandating constitutional provision statute or regulation that has been violated or an express or implied contract with the united states holding that congress has power to subject the states to wage and hour regulation