the south driveway a sáfety hazard thereby, forcing its closure. The closing of the south driveway left the property with only one means of access. Furthermore, Northbor- ough presented evidence that its only access was rendered more hazardous to use by the reduction in the visibility of frontage road from the driveway, the reduction in turning radius, and the reduction of the throat length of the driveway. The State’s pleadings alleged 70% of Northborough’s access would be taken. See State v. Munday, 868 S.W.2d 319, 320 (Tex.1993) (taking 28.5% of property owner’s access). Moreover, unsafe access may constitute the basis for material and substantial impairment of access. See Precast Structures, Inc. v. City of Houston, 942 S.W.2d 632, 637 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no writ) (<HOLDING>). Here, the placement of the exit ramp forcing
holding the taking of an exit making access difficult and dangerous for trucks carrying 125foot beams materially and substantially impaired access holding that although prison inmates have a first amendment right to access to the courts prison officials may regulate law library access including reasonable time place and manner of access taking into account the administrative needs of the institution holding that damages for diminished access are not compensable as long as suitable access remains holding that denial of access to carbon paper and reproduction equipment and denial of facetoface access to other inmates did not deprive an inmate of his right of access to the courts holding that reasonable access includes general facility access without notice and patient access with twentyfour hour notice