and involves an amount that cannot be calculated with specificity, it is equitable. Id. Here, the District Court’s order is clearly forward-looking and indeterminate, as it requires Goldman to pay Aleynikov’s attorney’s fees as he incurs them. We hold that the District Court’s order requiring the advancement of legal fees is injunctive and therefore immediately ap-pealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We join our sister circuits who have concluded the same under similar conditions. See Westar Energy, Inc. v. Lake, 552 F.3d 1215, 1222-23 (10th Cir.2009) (concluding that an order granting an executive advancement was an immediately appealable injunction because it required specific performance of a contract); Pac. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Dev. Corp., 28 F.3d 1093, 1096 (11th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Goldman also urges us to exercise our pendent
holding sanctions order pursuant to district courts inherent powers not immediately appealable holding that an order directing an insurer to advance legal fees pursuant to an insurance policy was an immediately appealable injunction holding an insurer has a right to rely on statements made in an insurance application holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order