of equitable conversion, retains a signifi cant interest in the enforcement of a land sales contract prior to obtaining legal title. Knight, 393 Md. at 49, 899 A.2d 156. Consonant with that end, equitable title is deemed to be superior to a subsequent judgment against the seller: One result of the doctrine [of equitable conversion] is that a judgment entered against the vendor after the contract has been made does not become a lien on the realty. A vendor’s judgment creditor may not execute on the realty because the vendor, sometimes described as trustee for the purchaser, has a right to the balance of the purchase money but has no beneficial interest in the property. Equitable title is superior to a later judgment lien. See, e.g., Kingsley v. Makay, 253 Md. 24, 251 A.2d 585 (1969) (<HOLDING>); Caltrider v. Caples, 160 Md. 392, 153 A. 445
holding that under mississippi law a purchaser is a bona fide purchaser for value without notice unless there is actual notice or circumstances which would put a purchaser on inquiry notice holding that where a purchaser of realty from the united states under a contract for deed giving the purchaser a contractual interest in and equitable title had taken possession of the realty and was using it as a commercial enterprise the purchasers interest was subject to taxation holding that the district court should not have entered a default judgment against an intervenor based on the original partys failure to appear holding that purchaser could rescind contract where seller failed to disclose a fact  the flooding of the subject real estate  that seller knew purchaser would regard as material recognizing rule and holding that judgment against original purchaser entered after original purchaser had assigned contract to buy did not establish lien on property