forth in paragraph (2). (2) Except as otherwise prescribed by general rules, or by order of the United States court, such transfer may be effected by filing a certified transcript of the final judgment of the United States court and the related pleadings in a court ... of this Commonwealth. The pleadings shall have the same effect as under the practice in the United States court, but the transferee court ... may require that they be amended to conform to the practice in this Commonwealth. 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 5103(a), (b)(1) — (2) (emphasis added). 9 .We also reject any assertion that Appellant’s effort to have the transcripts from the federal proceedings admitted wholesale by the PCRA court constitutes proper transfer under the statute. Appellant’s request was made to avoid the App.1999) (<HOLDING>); Martinez v. State, 130 Idaho 530, 944 P.2d
holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the date of filing the petition for dissolution as the valuation date for equitable distribution holding statute of limitations for filing petition for postconviction relief not tolled by general savings statute tolling limited to reasons enumerated in state postconviction relief act holding that the limitations period in section 1640e runs from the date of consummation of the transaction holding limitations period for filing petition for postconviction relief runs from date of final judgment not from date of subsequent order revoking appeal bond holding fiveyear limitation period in 28 usc  2462 runs from date of predicate violation not from date of administrative assessment of sanction