Keeling; Vine St. Exhibit 104 (J. Keeling 07/12/05 Dep. at 61). 86 . Mar. 20, 2006 Trial Test, of James Keeling. 87 . See Vine St. Exhibit 40 at 001947; Vine St. Exhibit 41 at 001954; Fedders Exhibit 14, Attachment G at M001686 (form Norge Village License and Franchise Agreement). 88 . Fedders Exhibit 14, Attachment G at M001645. 89 . See Mar. 21, 2006 Trial Test, of Peter Kras-noff; Vine St. Exhibit 80 at M002370 (figure 7), M002462; Vine St. Exhibit 100 (Warren Dep. at 111). 90 . See Payless Cleaners, 368 F.Supp.2d a nership or possession of the hazardous substance must be demonstrated, but ... alone will not suffice to establish [arranger] liability”); BP Amoco Chem. Co. v. Sun Oil Co., 316 F.Supp.2d 166, 172 (D.Del.2004) (applying Morton Int’l); Shell Oil Co., 294 F.3d at 1058 (<HOLDING>); Sea Lion, Inc. v. Wall Chem. Corp., 974
holding that ownership or possession or actual control is needed holding that cerclas statutory scheme makes authority to control handling and disposal critical but not squarely addressing the ownership or possession requirement issue holding that k no wing possession can be demonstrated by proof of either actual or constructive possession holding that the phrase possession or custody in  5225b requires actual and not merely constructive possession holding that a defendant is entitled to credit only for periods in which defendant is in actual or constructive control of jail or prison officials