794 (1983). In essence, the provision gives the Board stan-dardless discretion to approve the design of newsracks. The City claims that Section 1325.03 of the Lakewood Codified Ordinances provides the Board with adequate standards. Section 1325.03 allows the Board to regulate the construction or alteration of buildings according to “accepted and recognized architectural principles”. A newsrack, however, is not a building. The Chairman of the Architectural Board admitted at trial that the Board had no standards for approving or disapproving the design of newsracks. Since the ordinance contains no standards to guide the Board in approving or rejecting newsrack designs, we hold that provision unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. C. Provi 451 N.E.2d 1193 (1983) (<HOLDING>); and Associated Press v. National Labor
recognizing as a matter of federal law that an action to redress injuries to a corporation cannot be maintained by a shareholder in his own name but must be brought in the name of the corporation holding that a right of action for personal injuries resulting from negligence cannot be assigned absent statutory law holding that a municipal corporation may be liable for injuries resulting from its failure to keep the shoulder of a highway in repair holding that homeowners policy precluded coverage for injuries resulting from intentional acts holding that injuries to the neck and shoulder are unscheduled