Phillips, 52 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1106. This seems to place the onus on the number of copyrights registered to determine the number of statutory damage awards. The court in Stokes Seeds Ltd. v. Geo. W. Park Seed Co., 783 F.Supp. 104, 107 (W.D.N.Y.1991), seems to take the same approach in holding that the plaintiff could get only a single statutory damage award for a book of photographs. The photographs constitute only one work, even though the photographs were separately copyrightable, because they were assembled into a collective whole and registered as a compilation. As in Phillips, the Stokes Seeds court seems to look only to the number of registrations and eschews the “independent copyright life” test. Id.; see also XOOM, Inc. v. Imageline, Inc., 93 F.Supp.2d 688, 693 (E.D.Va.1999) (<HOLDING>) However, other courts have just as clearly
holding that for a compilation or derivative work there should be only one award of statutory damages per registration holding that the maximum statutory damages available to plaintiffs under the fdcpa is limited to 100000 per plaintiff per proceeding holding that there can be only one final appealable order holding that the record supported the district courts award of damages holding a court may not award punitive damages