specifically informed, by Leske, that she had been served with papers intended for them. See, R. House Dep., at 41; Leske Dep., at 50. We conclude, given the fullness of the Record before us, that substitute service on Leske, who was an adult woman, and who was a daily visitor, and periodic overnight guest at the Defendants’ household during the Summer of 1996, is sufficient for purposes of Rule 4.03(a). Such service of process was intended to give notice to the Defendants, and was reasonably calculated to reach them. See, Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., supra; Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. v. Kirke-vold, supra at 324. Our conclusion is supported by decisions from the Minnesota Courts, as well as from those of 'foreign jurisdictions. See, O’Sell v. Peterson, supra at 873-874 (<HOLDING>); citing, M. Lowenstein & Sons, Inc. v. Austin,
holding that service was proper where a copy of the summons and complaint was left with the defendants wife at the defendants maryland house in which the defendant had lived before moving ahead of his family to arizona where he had purchased a house intending never to return to maryland and to move his family to arizona noting that the service was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of service at the defendants dwelling house or usual place of abode where the service succeeded in actually apprising him of the lawsuit holding that service of a statecourt summons and complaint after removal to federal court is valid service holding that actual notice of lawsuit is no substitute for substantial compliance with frcp 4d1 requiring service on person of defendant on suitable resident at defendants dwelling or on defendants agent a  judgment entered by a court which lacks jurisdiction over the person of the defendant is void and may be set aside at any time pursuant to fedrcivp 60b4 personal jurisdiction is established either by proper service of process or by the defendants waiver of any defect in the service of process holding that leaving summons and complaint with the defendants 14yearold stepson who was staying at defendants home for a sixday noncustodial visitation constituted substitute service of process on defendant holding that service of summons was insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over defendant city where a copy of the summons and complaint was delivered to a person other than an official named in rule 4j5