of the sensing device but the fact of the intrusion into a closed area otherwise hidden from human view, which is the hallmark of any search.")(quoting United States v. Bronstein, 521 F.2d 459, 464 (2d Cir.1975)(Mansfield, J., concurring)). 6 . See People v. Daverin, 967 P.2d 629, 632 (Colo.1998)(""Another well-recognized exception to the warrant requirement is a search undertaken incident to a lawful arrest."). 7 . See People v. Hauseman, 900 P.2d 74, 77 (Colo.1995)(stating that "warrantless search of a vehicle lawfully impounded by law enforcement officials designed to produce an inventory of the contents of that vehicle and conducted pursuant to routine administrative procedures" is an exception to the warrant requirement). 8 . See People v. Kluhsman, 980 P.2d 529, 534 (Colo.1999)(<HOLDING>). 9 . See People v. Clements, 661 P.2d 267, 271
holding that the doorway of the home is a public place for purposes of the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment holding seizure of evidence in plain view reasonable under fourth amendment holding that the observation of evidence in plain view is not a search for purposes of the fourth amendment and does not require a warrant holding that plain view requirement that there be a prior justification for the officers presence was met by search warrant and that even assuming that warrant was invalid good faith exception was applicable to permit admission of the evidence holding that a canine sniff is a search for purposes of the fourth amendment