11. Moore v. Idealease of Wilmington, 358 B.R. 248, 250 (E.D.N.C.2006); In re igence claim is not a personal injury tort claim). B. The Limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(5) are Jurisdictional Having determined that the Plaintiffs’ defamation claims are personal injury tort claims, the Court must decide whether the general proscription in Section 157(b)(5) that personal injury tort claims “shall be tried in the district court” is jurisdictional or procedural. If Section 157(b)(5) is jurisdictional, then this Court cannot determine the part of the case for which jurisdiction is lacking. Smith, 389 B.R. at 910 (citing Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 94, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998)). If Section 157(b)(5) td.), 198 B.R. 616, 620 (Bankr. S.D.Cal.1996) (<HOLDING>); Boyer v. Balanoff (In re Boyer), 93 B.R. 313,
holding that a negligence claim is not a personal injury tort claim holding that a civil rights deprivation is a personal injury tort holding that age discrimination is not a personal injury tort holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort holding that sexual harassment is a personal injury tort