Huether is no stranger to being interviewed by law enforcement and that he voluntarily chose to be cooperative. Further, this court’s recent decision in United States v. Perrin, 659 F.3d 718 (8th Cir.2011), indicates that more than what is in the record here reviewed is required for a determination that Huether was in custody for Miranda purposes.' A federal officer, one of at least six in tactical gear who entered the house with a search warrant for child pornography, interviewed Perrin in his bedroom. Id. at 720. Before taking Perrin to the bedroom, the officer told Perrin he was free to leave and that he did not have to answer any questions, to which Perrin indicated he understood. Id. The officer nearly closed the bedroom door, leaving it slightly open, enabling anothe h Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). We affirm the district court’s judgment. The
holding that the court did not err in concluding that a defendant was not in custody where he made statements to law enforcement officers in his own home was not physically restrained during the conversation never manifested an intent to terminate the interaction and the officers never indicated to the defendant that they had probable cause to arrest him holding defendant was not in custody when he gave inculpatory statements in a windowless room with enlarged photographs on the wall as a deceptive interview tactic and where the officers falsely trumped up the evidence they said they possessed holding that an order granting the media the right to interview a defendant in a capital murder case was unreviewable upon appeal in the criminal trial and therefore immediately appealable as a collateral order because the review on appeal would have been too late to cure any damage to the defendant from what was said in the interview holding that deadly force was unreasonable where the suspect possessed a gun but was not pointing it at the officers and was not facing the officers when they shot holding that deadly force was unreasonable where according to the plaintiffs version of facts the decedent possessed a gun but was not pointing it at the officers and was not facing the officers when they shot him