that international law is and agree that we are bound by it.” Id.See also Saravia, 348 F.Supp.2d at 1154 (“Congress’ enactment of the TVPA, singling out torture and extrajudicial killing, confirms that extrajudicial killing provides a cause of action under federal law.”). Cf. Moragne v. States Marine Lines, Inc., 398 U.S. 375, 392, 90 S.Ct. 1772, 26 L.Ed.2d 339 (1970) (observing that it is “the duty of the common-law court to perceive the impact of major legislative innovations and to interweave the new legislative policies with the inherited body of common-law principles”). Thus, the Court holds that there is a binding customary international law norm against extrajudicial killing. See Saravia, 348 F.Supp.2d at 1153-54. See also Doe I v. Unocal Corp., 395 F.3d 932, 945 (9th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); In re Estate of Marcos Human Rights
holding that a violation of a rightofway statute is negligence as a matter of law holding that section 1983 actions based on violation of the fourth amendment may not rest on violation of state law holding that agents violation of irs regulations did not mandate exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of violation recognizing murder as a jus cogens violation and thus as a violation of the law of nations holding that violation of state law was not a per se constitutional violation