6 . A "judicial question" is a questi 9 N.E.2d 675 (1965) (reversing dismissal on the basis of allegations that defendant city conspired with other defendants to sell to defendant department store an existing parking lot for private use and thereafter take plaintiff's property to replace such parking facility for purported public use); City of Austin v. Whittington, 55 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 1245, 384 S.W.3d 766 (2012) (concluding that parking garage was a "public building" where it was open to the public and the primary purpose of the garage was to support an expanded convention center legislatively considered a public use supportive of the city's condemnation of privately owned land necessary for such use); Rhode Island Economic Development Corp. v. The Parking Co., L.P., 892 A.2d 87 (<HOLDING>). 8 . Muskogee attempts to distinguish Lowery
holding that the county government not the federal government was liable for the taking of an air easement over plaintiffs property even though the airport was funded in part by a federal grant based on compliance with federal regulations holding that a cause of action for an unconstitutional taking accrues at the time the taking occurs holding that a prohibition on mining activities that was withdrawn after six years was a temporary taking and rejecting the governments argument that because the taking was allegedly intended at the outset to be irreversible and for all time it was permanent holding that an attached garage is part of the home for payton purposes even when the garage door is open holding where condemnation of a temporary easement in an airport parking garage was primarily designed for economic benefit to gain control of the garage at a discounted price the taking was not for public use and therefore was an unconstitutional taking