and not exceeding life imprisonment, followed by probation for life .. . ” As previously noted, Pepe-Frazier contends that the trial court’s imposition of a life sentence for his commission of one instance of oral sex with the 14-year-old victim constituted “cruel and unusual punishment.” As our Supreme Court has held, [o]utside the context of the death penalty, of extreme cases such as life imprisonment as punishment for overtime parking, and ... of life without parole for a juvenile convicted of non-homicide crimes, successful challenges to the proportionality of legislatively mandated terms of imprisonment should be “exceedingly rare.” And when, as here, no categorical Eighth Amendment restriction applies, we must “determine whether a sentence for a term of years is SE2d 358) (1989) (<HOLDING>); cf. Bradshaw v. State, 284 Ga. 675, 683 (4)
holding that life sentence imposed for kidnapping with bodily injury of 14yearold victim was not cruel and unusual punishment even though bodily injury was slight given circumstances attendant upon offense holding that life sentence imposed for kidnapping with bodily injury was not cruel and unusual even if victims injuries were minor holding that it was a double jeopardy violation to convict and sentence for both dui with serious bodily injury and driving without a valid license with serious bodily injury based on an injury to a single victim recognizing that when a defendants negligence causes bodily injury the plaintiff can recover damages for past present and future medical expenses bodily injury and emotional distress holding that the fatal injury to a murder victim may be considered as satisfying the bodily injury component of the capital felony of kidnapping with bodily injury