1193 (N.D.Iowa 2000) (Iowa State Tort Claims Act does not constitute express waiver of Iowa’s Eleventh Amendment immunity to suits in federal court). Rasmussen and Renken in their professional capacities also possess Eleventh Amendment immunity. See Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 1010 (8th Cir.1999) (Section 1983 suit could not be brought against state commissioners in their official capacities, because such suit was no different than a suit against the state itself). Nor did the district court err in granting summary judgment to Rasmussen in her individual capacity. Teska failed to connect Rasmussen to the investigation or adjudication resulting in the termination of Teska’s parental rights. See Thomason v. SCAN Volunteer Serv., Inc., 85 F.3d 1365, 1370 (8th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). The record does not contain any facts
holding that child cannot consent to search of parents bedroom holding that parents who filed a civil rights action following the removal of child by child welfare authorities failed to connect program directors actions to alleged violation of parents constitutional rights recognizing emotional bond between foster parents and child although ultimately determining foster parents did not have rights of parents in dependency action under chapter 2644 rcw holding that in the case of a tenmonthold child it is practically impossible for a child so young who is entirely dependent on its parents to acclimatize independent of the immediate home environment of the parents holding that parents may not voluntarily terminate their rights in a child to avoid child support payments or contract away a child support obligation