this incident, the Flying Salsa had stayed open until 3:00 a.m. When considered together, this evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s inference that defendant had reasonable grounds to believe the Flying Salsa might have been occupied when he fired two shots into the building while Herring was inside. Accordingly, the Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for insufficient evidence. For the same reasons, the Court of Appeals correctly held that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the basis of insufficient evidence. See State v. Fleming, 350 N.C. 109, 146, 512 S.E.2d 720, 745 (citing State v. Wilson, 313 N.C. 516, 538, 330 S.E.2d 450, 465 (1985)) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 941 (1999). The
holding that denial of joinder motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable  holding that the trial courts denial of a motion to set aside the verdict for insufficient evidence is reviewable only for abuse of discretion holding that the boards denial of a motion to reopen is reviewable by the federal courts of appeals