1,1.27-28. 51 . Supplemental Brief From Dennis Winters Re Accounting Motion for Disgorgement, p. 3, 1.27-28. 52 . Id. at p. 4,1.7-9. 53 . Id. at p. 5, 1.6-8. 54 . The fiduciary duties of a debtor in possession’s counsel to the estate do not extend to any particular creditor in a chapter 11 case. See, e.g., ICM Notes, Ltd. v. Andrews & Kurth L.L.P., 278 B.R. 117, 126 (S.D.Tex.2002) (while debtor in possession's counsel may have a duty to estate and creditors in general, there is no fiduciary duty to particular creditors), aff'd, 324 F.3d 768 (5th Cir.2003); In re Texasoil Enters., 296 B.R. 431, 435 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.2003) (opining that "counsel to a debtor in possession may not owe a duty directly to creditors”); Scheftner v. Foster (In re Dieringer), 132 B.R. 34, 37 (Bankr.N.D.Cal.1991) (<HOLDING>). 55 .In Sidco, a district court in the Eastern
holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code holding that a debtors attorney is not liable to creditors for mishandling a bankruptcy except to the extent that his conduct was fraudulent or otherwise intentionally wrongful holding that to the extent simple assault under pennsylvania law is committed intentionally or knowingly it is by definition purposeful holding pursuant to bankruptcy rule 7004b9 that because the creditor mailed the complaint and summons to the debtors attorney and to the address listed in the debtors bankruptcy petition service of process was sufficient even if the debtors were out of the country and did not actually receive notice of the complaint and summons holding that a fraudulent transfer claim against a corporate debtors control person belongs to the corporate debtor not to specific creditors