v. City of Schenectady, 97 N.Y.2d 78, 735 N.Y.S.2d 868, 761 N.E.2d 560, 564 (2001) (invalid warrant). 3 . See, e.g., Rhodes v. Mabus, 676 F.Supp. 755, 758-59 (S.D.Miss.1987) (prosecutor improp- - erly communicated with grand jurors); - Bearden v. BellSouth Telecomms., Inc., 29 So.3d 761, 766 (Miss.2010) (lack of jurisdiction); Parrish v. Marquis, 172 S.W.3d 526, 533 (Tenn.2005) (charges outside statute of limitations); Palmer Dev. Corp. v. Gordon, 723 A.2d 881, 884 (Me.1999) (charges outside statute of limitations); Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1246 (D.C.1986) (failure to state a claim). 4 .See, e.g., Schlueter v. S. Energy Homes, Inc., 252 Fed.Appx. 7, 10-11 (6th. Cir.2007) (speedy trial dismissal not a favorable termination); Donahue v. Gavin, 280 F.3d 371, 384 (3d Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Brayshaw v. Garrett, No. 4:10CV272, 2011 WL
holding that a nolle prosequi does not indicate innocencewhere the prosecutor simply reasoned that the plaintiff was  not likely to receive any additional jail time if convicted in a retrial holding that trial judge was not authorized to impose jail time as condition of probation and deleting the 90 day jail penalty holding that the evidence was insufficient to prove the offense of supplying contraband to a jail because the defendant was not in possession of the drugs when he was taken to jail where the arresting officer entered the jail with the drugs holding that the defendants possession of contraband in a jail was not the result of a voluntary act on his part because officers brought him into the jail under arrest holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient