the appellant from properly presenting the case to the court of appeals. TexR.App. P. 44.1(a). 11 . Family Code section 56.01 directs that the requirements governing a juvenile’s appeal are those in civil rules generally. The standard for reversible error in a criminal case is different from that in a civil case. If the error in a criminal case is a constitutional one, reversal is required "unless the court determines beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not contribute to the conviction or punishment.” TexR.App. P. 44.2(a). If the error is not constitutional, "[a]ny ... error, defect, irregularity, or variance that does not affect substantial rights must be disregarded.” TexR.App. P. 44.2(b). The United States Supreme Court has held that a juven .App.San Antonio 1996, no writ) (<HOLDING>); In re A.L.S., 915 S.W.2d at 116 (holding that
holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by not conducting multiple polls of jury where none of the jurors expressed uncertainty or disagreement about the verdict holding that explanations of arbitration awards are not required holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it gave aggravating factors considerable weight holding that harm analysis should not be conducted when none of the explanations required by section 5403b are given holding that former texrapp p 81b1 now texrapp p 441 did not apply when a trial court gave none of the required explanations