ground for the decision can be inferred from the facts.” Brown, 211 F.3d at 1223. An arbitrator manifestly disregards the law if he was conscious of the law and deliberately ignored it; merely misinterpreting, misstating, or misapplying the law does not suffice. B.L. Harbert Int’l, LLC, 441 F.3d at 910. Even if an arbitration award clearly contradicts an express term of the contract at issue and the arbitrator clearly erred, the award will not be set aside unless the “arbitration loser” establishes that the arbitrator recognized a clear rale of law and deliberately ignored it. Id. at 911-12. “Neither this Court nor the Supreme Court has decided whether collective bargaining agreements are subject to the FAA.” Brisentine v. Stone & Webster Eng’g Corp., 117 F.3d 519, 525 (11th Cm. 1997) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, federal courts have
holding that arbitration provisions that preclude class actions are not unconscionable holding an entire arbitration clause is void and arbitration cannot be compelled where contract contained unconscionable clause and has a nonseverability clause holding that a mandatory arbitration clause does not preclude litigating a federal statutory claim holding that the statute is mandatory holding that claim was not subject to mandatory arbi tration because the parties specifically excluded it from the general arbitration clause