This contact is not enough to preserve his parental rights. J.M.M. has been in placement for over twenty-seven months. Given Father’s failure to perform parental duties and given that he has been unable to remain out of jail for any period of time, we agree with the trial court in terminating his parental rights. The termination was supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record. ¶ 14 Father’s third and fifth allegations assert that the trial court erred in terminating his parental rights when he did not have assistance of counsel. How ever, after reviewing Father’s brief, we find that he has not made a colorable argument on appeal. Therefore, we find that this argument is waived, and we will not address this issue. Cf. Commonwealth v. Irby, 700 A.2d 463, 464 (Pa.Super.1997) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 15 In conclusion, we find that the trial
holding that arguments which are not sufficiently developed are waived holding that arguments not raised in district court are waived holding arguments not appropriately developed in brief are waived holding that arguments not raised before the trial court are waived holding that arguments not fully developed until a reply brief are waived