segregation from the general prison population."). 36 . Sandin, 515 U.S. at 483-84, 115 S.Ct. 2293 ("States may under certain circumstances create liberty interests which are protected by the Due Process Clause."). 37 . Id. at 484, 115 S.Ct. 2293; accord Larson, 90 P.3d at 135. 38 . State of Alaska Department of Corrections Policies and Procedures (P & P) Definition 818.14(B). 39 . P & P Purpose 818.14. 40 . P & P Procedure 818.14(8A)(4). 41 . P & P Procedure 818.14(G). We also note that A 3, 306-09 (Alaska 2007) (deeming color-able an inmate's claim that he was entitled to due process before he could be placed in punitive segregation for 30 days because of his state-constitutional interest in rehabilitation}. 43 . See, e.g., Dominique v. Weld, 73 F.3d 1156, 1159-61 (1st Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). 44 . Sandin, 515 U.S. at 484, 486, 115 S.Ct.
holding removal of convicted prisoner from community work release program did not implicate a statecreated liberty interest because his transfer to a more secure facility subjected him to conditions no different from those ordinarily experienced by large numbers of other inmates serving their sentences in customary fashion holding that an inmate had no liberty interest in avoiding transfer to a more restrictive facility holding that prisoner had no liberty interest in remaining in voluntary boot camp program despite fact that completion of program qualifies inmate for early release holding that 117 days in administrative segregation due to lack of bed space did not implicate a statecreated liberty interest holding that 12 days of prehearing confinement in the shu did not implicate a statecreated liberty interest