property until converted to real property, pursuant to § 700.111.”); In the Estate of Parker, 25 S.W.3d 611, 615-16 (Mo.App.2000) (“A person converts his mobile home from personal to real property by causing the mobile home to become a fixture.”). See also In re Thornton, 269 B.R. 682, 685 (Bankr.W.D.Mo.2001) (finding that a manufactured home had been converted to real property, where the manufactured home’s wheels and tires had been removed, skirting had been installed, the structure had been placed on blocks, and the structure had been attached to its own well and septic system). Green Tree does not contend that the Colemans’ manufactured home has been legally converted from personal to real property and presented no evidence at the confirmation hearing on Ju nkr.M.D.Pa.2007) (<HOLDING>); In re Davis, 373 B.R. 46 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio
holding that the addition of a definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113aa did not change the scope of the 11 usc  1322b antimodification provision and  1322b remains applicable only to real property holding that because the definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113a includes incidental property a secured interest in incidental property cannot be modified under 11 usc  1322b holding that the definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113aa does not operate to extend the antimodification provision of 11 usc  1322b to structures that are not real property holding that a lien on the debtors mobile home which was the debt ors principal residence as defined by 11 usc  10113aa was not subject to modi fication under 11 usc  1322b holding that the definition of debtors principal residence in 11 usc  10113aa protects holder of secured claim in a mobile home that is debtors principal residence from modification under 11 usc  1322b