using the formula as outlined in part I, supra, it must next determine if the protest petitions on file constitute the necessary twenty percent minimum of that total acreage. Thus, for pur poses of Unruh, the “percentage of the protest petitions” will then be determined, which in turn allows for a calculation as to whether that percentage is quantitatively sufficient to warrant a three-fourths vote in order to enact the zoning change. Moreover, the process of imposing the formula as described in part I, supra, simultaneously forces the City to assess “the accuracy of the petitions” — thereby fulfilling the Unruh requirement that all protest petitions prove qualitatively sufficient — by weeding out any petitions from persons who do not qualify under the protester criteria. See id. (<HOLDING>); see also N.C.G.S. § 160A-385 (providing that
holding insurers duty to defend is determined by allegations in the petition holding that it is not holding that it is the zoning authoritys statutory duty to conduct such petition evaluations holding that before denying petition trial court must conduct an evidentiary hearing and state specific reasons for denying the petition holding that such a duty exists