may allow_ (b) Effect of Admission. Any matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission. Subject to rule 1.200 governing amendment of a pretrial order, the court may permit withdrawal or amendment when the presentation of the merits of the action will be sub-served by it and the party who obtained the admission fails to satisfy the court that withdrawal or amendment will prejudice that party in maintaining an action or defense on the merits. The liberal standard for relief under this rule reflects the strong preference that genuinely disputed claims be decided upon their merits rather than technical rules of default. See Sterling v. City of West Palm Beach, 595 So.2d 284, 285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (<HOLDING>); Melody Tours, Inc. v. Granville Market
recognizing judicial admissions doctrine in the virgin islands holding that the government may not introduce evidence obtained through violations of the fourth amendment holding that evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures is inadmissible in state court recognizing that the use of admissions obtained through a technicality should not form a basis to preclude adjudication of a legitimate claim holding that because suppression of illegally obtained evidence is a form of injunctive relief suppression of defendants bank records obtained in violation of rsa chapter 359c is an appropriate remedy