announced 78 years later that juveniles have a constitutional right to counsel; we merely note that it remains the duty of a parent in the first instance to pay for such necessaries.” H.V., 252 S.W.3d at 327 n. 55 (citations omitted). 4 . The majority correctly observes that the Hardin Court did cite to Section 154.001, but this citation followed the familiar maxim that "parents have a legal duty to support their children." For its ultimate holding — the rule that is the focus of today's en banc decision— the only direct citation from the Hardin Court is to Roosth v. Roosth, a decision that never reached the merits of how a judgment for attorney’s fees may be enforced. See Hardin, 161 S.W.3d at 25; Roosth v. Roosth, 889 S.W.2d 445, 456 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1994, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). 5 . In Wagner, we denied the relator's writ
holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees holding attorneys testimony on all work performed sufficient to support attorneys fees award even though no time records presented holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees holding that a public administrator was not entitled to attorneys fees in a claim against the estate of a former guardian where the case was not one where attorneys fees were authorized and there was no evidence to support the award holding evidence which was similar to the evidence offered here to be factually sufficient to support an award of attorneys fees