presumed to be constitutional.” State v. Rio Vista Oil, Ltd., 786 P.2d 1343, 1349 (Utah 1990). As this court stated in In re Estate of Baer: The decisions of this court unanimously support a presumption of constitutionality of legislative enactments. In determining constitutionality, statutes are presumed to be constitutional until the contrary is clearly shown. It is only when statutes manifestly infringe upon some constitutional provision that they can be declared void. Every reasonable presumption must be indulged in and every reasonable doubt resolved in favor of constitutionality. In re Estate of Baer, 562 P.2d 614, 616 (Utah), appeal dismissed sub nom. Baer v. Baer, 434 U.S. 805, 98 S.Ct. 35, 54 L.Ed.2d 63 (1977); see also Murray City v. Hall, 663 P.2d 1314, 1317-18 (Utah 1983) (<HOLDING>). Nonetheless, when a proper challenge to the
holding in the context of a motion for preliminary injunction that once federal funds are distributed to the states and obligated they cannot be recouped and that it would be impossible  to award the plaintiffs the relief they request if they should eventually prevail on the merits holding that only the legislature can authorize such payments when sovereign immunity exits if and when they are found and declared by it to be moral obligations of the state and specific appropriations made for payment thereof holding that statutory provisions cannot be read standing alone instead they must be construed in light of the entire act of which they are a part holding that two statutes that are part of the general assemblys adam walsh act are unconstitutional and are severed and that after severance they may not be enforced holding that statutes are endowed with a strong presumption of validity and that they should not be declared unconstitutional if there is any reasonable basis upon which they can be found to come within the constitutional frame work sic quoting greaves v state 528 p2d 805 807 utah 1974