problem specifically arising in the realm of computer [technology],” DDR, 773 F.3d at 1257. Thus, it fails to recite an inventive concept. Accordingly, claim 15 fails to recite patent-eligible subject matter under § 101. 4. Alice Step Two for Remaining Asserted Claims of the ’217 Patent— Evaluation of Abstract Claims for an Inventive Concept Plaintiff has not separately identified an inventive concept for any of the remaining asserted claims of the ’217 patent apart from those already discussed above. Thus, the Court need not address whether any of the additional limitations in the remaining claims provide an inventive concept. Shakur, 514 F.3d at 892 (litigants waive arguments by failing to raise them in an opposition to a motion to dismiss); accord John-Charles, 646 F.3d at 1247 n.4 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, for the same reasons discussed
holding that the defendant waived argument on appeal by failing to develop a cogent argument holding that an issue is waived where the defendant failed to develop an argument in his appellate brief and cited no authority holding an argument waived in part because the party failed to develop it in the district court holding that the appellant waived this argument holding party failed to develop any argument on this front and thus has waived it