Motion, seeks an award pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1927 of all fees and costs expended in connection with the Recusal Motion. Section 1927, entitled Counsel’s liability for excessive costs, provides: Any attorney or other person admitted to conduct cases in any court of the United States or any Territory thereof who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the excess costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such conduct. 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (2006). Section 451 of Title 28 Ltd., Inc.), 40 F.3d 1084, 1086 (10th Cir.1994) (concluding “... we must hold that bankruptcy courts are not within the contemplation of § 1927.”); Perroton v. Gray (In re Perroton), 958 F.2d 889 (9th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); 1 CollieR on BaNKruptcy ¶ 2.02[4], at 2-13
holding bankruptcy courts are not listed in section 451 and it is indisputable that as presently constituted they are not article iii courts and therefore lack jurisdiction to award fees pursuant to 28 usc section 2412d1a holding a bankruptcy court is not a court of the united states entitled to waive filing fees pursuant to 28 usc section 1915a holding that 28 usc  1961a applies to bankruptcy court judgments because a bankruptcy court is a unit of the district court holding based upon the reasoning of in re davis infra since a bankruptcy court is not an article iii court it cannot be considered a court of the united states for purposes of awarding fees under 28 usc  7430 holding that the customs court lacked jurisdiction when plaintiff failed to comply with all terms of consent by the united states mandated by 28 usc  1582 1976 the predecessor to 28 usc  1581a 2000