is a written plea seeking the prosecutor's sympathies for a man it claims is wrongfully accused. Even if Cunefare's letter had in fact been written by the defendant's wife, it would represent the wife's recantation of her earlier allegations against the defendant. While it is not uncommon for victims of domestic abuse to recant their initial accusations before trial, it is likewise not uncommon for the People to continue with prosecution under such cireum-stances because ultimately the district attorney, and no one else, makes the decision whether to prosecute. The prosecutor, of course, retains significant discretion in determining who to prosecute, what erimes to charge, and whether to request the dismissal of pending charges. People v. Dist. Ct., 632 P.2d 1022, 1024 (Colo.1981) (<HOLDING>); see also People v. Sepulveda, 65 P.3d 1002,
holding that given the broad discretion afforded federal prosecutors to enforce the united states criminal laws in the absence of clear evidence to the contrary courts presume that federal prosecutors have properly discharged them official duties recognizing broad district court discretion to stay proceedings as an incident to its power to control its docket recognizing the broad discretion of prosecutors in making decisions about whom to prosecute and what charges to bring holding that district courts discretion is extremely broad holding that the broad nature of the prosecutors discretion generally bars the judiciary from intervening to limit or otherwise control it