370, 376 (Ind.Ct.App.2011), trans. denied. Waiver notwithstanding, Booth argues that the failure of one defendant to object to preferred venue constitutes waiv er of the issue by all defendants. In support of this proposition, Booth cites State ex rel. Kenamond v. Warmuth, 179 W.Va. 230, 366 S.E.2d 738 (1988). We believe the greater weight of authority in federal and state courts tilts to the contrary; and, Booth directs us to no Indiana case law that supports her contention. See, e.g., Ware v. United Rentals (N. Am.), Inc., 2010 WL 1374583, *2 (E.D.Tex.2010) (concluding that a defendant that objected to venue had not waived that challenge where a codefendant failed to file a motion or answer objecting to venue); Schultz v. MMI Products, Inc., 30 A.3d 1224, 1229 (Pa.Super.Ct.2011) (<HOLDING>). We decline Booth's invitation to con-elude
holding that where a defendant if given the opportunity to renew a motion for a change of venue immediately prior to trial but fails to do so the right to challenge venue is waived holding that the failure of three defendants to object to venue did not waive a fourth defendants objection and therefore affirming the trial courts decision to transfer venue holding that the defendant waived the issue of change of venue where the trial court denied the motion for a change of venue without prejudice stating that it was willing to reconsider the motion at any time during the jury selection process but the defendant never renewed the motion for a change of venue holding that under the second circuits longstanding doctrine a defendants failure to specifically object to venue at the close of evidence constitutes a waiver of objection to venue holding that if a modification petition is filed in a county where venue is appropriate it is improper to transfer the venue to another county merely because venue also would have been proper in the other county however once an enforcement proceeding is undertaken in an appropriate venue venue is improper in a different county over a subsequently filed petition to modify the decree which was the subject of the enforcement proceedings