a significant role in the daily lives of [lawful permanent resident aliens].” Etuk v. Slattery, 936 F.2d 1433, 1437 (2nd. Cir.1991). Failure to carry one’s green card on his or her person can subject a legal resident alien to criminal sanctions, 8 U.S.C. § 1304(e), and green cards are an essential means by which resident aliens can establish eligibility for employment and participation in federally funded programs. See Etuk, 936 F.2d at 1437 (discussing relevant statutory provisions). Given the importance of these documents, the challenged seizure undoubtedly subjected the plaintiffs to disruption of their travel plans in order to remain with the documents or arrange for their return. Accord Place, 462 U.S. at 708, 103 S.Ct. 2637; United States v. Baro, 15 F.3d 563, 567 n. 1 (6th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 912, 115 S.Ct. 285,
holding that a company policy which forced an employee to choose between losing his job for the exercise of his rights under erisaprotected benefits or keeping his job and forcing him to give up his benefits would be essentially unfair or a quintessential hobsons choice  holding that an initially reasonable seizure can become an unreasonable seizure that violates the fourth amendment when officers refuse to return seized property holding no seizure occurred when law enforcement officers returned the plane ticket and identification immediately after looking at them holding that if a residents decision to open his door to police is made involuntarily a seizure within his home has occurred holding that seizure of travelers cash was tantamount to a seizure of his person where officer presented traveler with a hobsons choice abandon more than 14000 to a plainclothed stranger without obtaining a receipt in return or miss his flight forfeit his plane ticket and remain stranded in foreign environs