ability of the Secured Creditor to do so should not be in question since we know of at least $180,000.00 in cash in her possession which she will have in addition to the Property. Alternatively, if she chooses, she can sell Fitzhugh Place, Phase II as a whole thereby passing the investment opportunity on to someone else. Although this second alternative may result in the Secured Creditor realizing less today than she would receive in the future if the property was held for investment and ultimate development, that decision is hers. It does not affect the proper manner of valuation of the collateral for this Court to use in determining the proper credit on the Secured Creditor’s claim in this proceeding. Valuation of Fitzhugh Place, Phase II in accordance with its highest and best use (<HOLDING>) is appropriate as it will yield the most net
holding that there is no duty to override a plans mandate that company stock be offered as an investment option holding as an investment for future development holding that in texas future predictions and opinions especially those regarding the future profitability of a business cannot as a matter of law form a basis for fraud holding that an investment contract with a fixed return can still be security holding that future predictions and opinions especially those regarding future profitability of business cannot form basis for fraud as matter of law