officer may also frisk an individual for weapons if the officer reasonably believes that person to be armed and dangerous.” Id. In this case, the conclusion that the officers had reasonable suspicion is a straightforward one. In light of both (i) the specific, detailed and contemporaneous tip that the officers received from their reliable confidential informant regarding Vargas’s armed presence at 13 Putnam Heights (and the past tips regarding Vargas’s criminal conduct), and (ii) Vargas’s evasive flight when Detective Laureano and Trooper Diaz approached him (in a “high crime area” known for having “a lot of drugs [and] a lot of guns”), the officers clearly had reasonable suspicion to detain Vargas. See Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 146-47, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972)(<HOLDING>); Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 124-25,
holding that reasonable suspicion justified a terry stop of the defendant when she was walking and talking with known drug dealers who were known to be at the scene to buy and sell cocaine holding that information of criminal activity given by a known reliable informant is enough to sustain a terry stop holding that tip from known reliable informant that was immediately verifiable at the scene could form basis for reasonable suspicion and forcible terry stop holding that an unverified tip from a known informant was sufficiently reliable to justify a terry stop and frisk holding that an anonymous tip supported a terry stop where the informant provided several details but refused to give his name