to another person. When considering a motion for a directed verdict, the trial court is required to “draw all fair and reasonable inferences from the evidence in favor of the Commonwealth.” Commonwealth v. Benham, 816 S.W.2d 186, 187 (Ky.1991). Only when the evidence is insufficient to induce reasonable jurors to believe beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant is guilty, should a directed verdict be given. Id. “For the purpose of ruling on the motion, the trial court must assume that the evidence for the Commonwealth is true, but reserving to the jury questions as to the credibility and weight to be given to such testimony.” Id. “On appellate review, the test of directed verd 9) (“It is self-evident that bullets may ricochet.”). Cf. Swan v. Commonwealth, 384 S.W.3d 77, 104 (Ky.2012) (<HOLDING>). As such, we conclude that there was no error.
holding that a mother could consent to a search of her adult sons bedroom including a closed duffle bag stored in between the mattresses on the bed holding that appellants mother had the authority to consent to search of defendants bedroom defendant lived with parents rentfree for four years mother owned the house appellants bedroom door was open mother knocked whenever appellants door was locked and there were no restrictions placed on mothers right to enter bedroom holding that there was sufficient evidence of wanton endangerment where a bullet came within fifteen feet of a bystander holding that there was sufficient evidence of wanton endangerment where defendant pointed a gun and fired two shots while in a crowded restaurant thereby creating dangerous atmosphere for other diners holding that there was insufficient evidence of wanton endangerment where evidence established that the victim was in a back bedroom behind a closed door and hiding under a bed when three shots were fired in the front living room