Walton’s alleged violations of the Fort Worth Police Department’s sexual harassment policy to Appellant. The Texas Supreme Court has held that a party who wants protection under the Act must report a violation to the proper agency. Tex. Dep’t of Transp. v. Needham, 82 S.W.3d 314, 319 (Tex. 2002). The proper agency, in this case, is one that has the authority to regulate under, enforce, investigate, or prosecute a violation of Texas’s sexual harassment and employment retaliation statutes. Id. This court has held that a city’s general authority to regulate under, enforce, and investigate claims of sexual harassment is not enough to make it an appropriate law enforcement authority under the Act. See City of Weatherford v. Catron, 88 S.W.3d 261, 268-69 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). We hold that Appellee’s sexual harassment and
holding that a violation of a rightofway statute is negligence as a matter of law holding that citys enforcement of the entire state penal code would not constitute a city policy because the city was required to follow state law holding that employee who reports violation of law to an agency that is not an appropriate law enforcement authority may nonetheless be entitled to whistleblower protection if he in good faith believed agency was the appropriate authority holding monell claim fails as a matter of law unless a city employees conduct violates one of the plaintiffs federal rights holding as a matter of law that the city is not an appropriate law enforcement authority under section 554002b for the reporting of another employees violation of federal or state sexual harassment laws