we conclude that the denial of a new trial was an abuse of discretion, we REVERSE and REMAND for a new trial. CARPENETI, Justice, not participating. 1 . Conam Alaska v. Bell Lavalin, Inc., 842 P.2d 148, 154 (Alaska 1992). 2 . See Langdonv. Champion, 745 P.2d 1371, 1372 n. 2 (Alaska 1987). 3 . Based on two mentions by Perdue’s counsel of Pugliese's claim for $540 in past lost wages, Pugliese also argues that the parties stipulated to Pugliese’s entitlement to compensation for that amount. But the record does not disclose any stipulation as to the $540 lost wage claim. Per-due’s counsel simply mentioned that Pugliese claimed only $540 in past lost wages. The statements accurately described Pugliese's claim. 4 . 718 P.2d 929 (Alaska 1986). 5 . Id. at 931. 6 .Id. at 933. 7 . See id. at 932 (<HOLDING>) (internal quotations omitted). 8 . Id. at 933.
holding that prosecutors phrasing argument in terms of i think or i think the evidence shows to which trial counsel did not object is not prosecutorial misconduct if the arguments are based on evidence or reasonable inferences holding statements i just dont think that i should say anything and i need somebody that i can talk to to be ambiguous rather than assertion of right to remain silent holding a suspects request for some time to think alone was not an invocation of the right to silence holding do you think i need a lawyer to be ambiguous holding that defense counsels estimate that compensable damages were 6900070000 and concession that i think hes been significantly injured i think he has injury now i think it may need treatment we dont know for sure were not judicial admissions