during the course of representation). 8 . See Bellino v. Simon, 1999 WL 1277535 (E.D.La.1999) (disqualifying counsel and his firm because counsel was a necessary witness, his testimony would contradict his client's assertions, and his actions were in question). See also Lange v. Orleans Levee Dist., 1997 WL 668216 at *5 (E.D.La.1997) (disqualifying plaintiff's lawyers and the rest of their firm because the lawyers were likely to be called as witnesses to testify adversely to the client). 9 .The old § 23:1006 did not have a prescriptive period, but the courts drew on tort analogies to assign a one-year prescriptive period. See Winbush v. Normal Life of Louisiana, Inc., 599 So.2d 489, 491 (La.App. 3d Cir.1992). 10 . See Roth v. N.J. Malin & Assocs., 1998 WL 898367 at *2 (E.D.La.1998) (<HOLDING>). The statute similarly does not provide a
recognizing the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress holding that act did not bar intentional infliction of emotional distress claim holding that intentional infliction of emotional distress is a personal injury tort holding that the prescriptive period of  23333c now codified at  23303d applies only to causes of action arising under chapter 3a of title 23 which does not include intentional infliction of emotional distress or retaliatory discharge recognizing validity of cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress