pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) Cli-nesmith alleged that the court and jail records show on their face that he was incarcerated from October 13, 1998, until his sentencing on May 25, 1999, yet he only received jail credit for seventy-eight days. The trial court denied the motion, finding the court records showed that Cli-nesmith was only incarcerated from April 14, 1999, until May 25, 1999. The records attached by the trial court do not, however, support this conclusion. We, therefore, reverse and remand. See McPherson v. State, 750 So.2d 125 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). On remand, the trial court shall consider the relevant court and jail records in order to determine whether Clinesmith is entitled to relief. See Hidalgo v. State, 729 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>). If the trial court again finds that
holding that the evidence was insufficient to prove the offense of supplying contraband to a jail because the defendant was not in possession of the drugs when he was taken to jail where the arresting officer entered the jail with the drugs holding that the defendants possession of contraband in a jail was not the result of a voluntary act on his part because officers brought him into the jail under arrest holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient holding that a youth detention facility was a jail for purposes of statute requiring credit for time served in jail while awaiting trial holding that jail records can properly be considered in determining jail credit issues raised pursuant to rule 3800a