find that because of the need for officer and public safety and the need to preserve evidence, there existed ample justification to conduct this search. d. The Place in Which it is Conducted Finally, we turn to the last Bell factor and consider the location in which the police conducted the search. Of all the factors considered thus far, we find this factor most troubling, yet ultimately conclude that it was reasonable under the circumstances. See Polk v. Montgomery Co., 782 F.2d 1196, 1201-62 (4th Cir.1986) (whether the strip search was conducted in private is especially relevant in determining whether a strip s 4) (finding unconstitutional “routine strip searches in a public area of persons detained for minor traffic offenses”); United States v. Ford, 232 F.Supp.2d 625 (E.D.Va.2002) (<HOLDING>). We do not have that here. Here, while it is
holding that strip search incident to arrest was not per se unreasonable but holding that search was performed in an unreasonable manner when conducted in view of the public holding that contraband would have been inevitably discovered where agents conducted a warrantless search while obtaining a search warrant and later conducted a second legal search in which agents discovered contraband holding search unreasonable when conducted on the highway in broad day light holding searches conducted without a warrant based on probable cause are presumptively unreasonable holding unconstitutional the administrative search of personal belongings conducted in that case