at 7.) Plaintiff asserted that case law supported judgment in favor of plaintiff “because the minor error on AAL’s Financing Statements’ coversheets is at the end of the debtor’s name and a diligent examiner would have to look at all related entries such as the EAI entries and could not merely rely on a search of the exact corporate name.” (Id. at 8.) {¶ 17} In Southern Supply, cited by plaintiff in support of its contention, the court held not to be seriously misleading the identification of the debtor on the financing statement as “Southern Supply Co.,” as opposed to the correct name of “Southern Supply Company of Greenville, N.C., Inc.”; see, also, In re Nara Non Food Distributing, Inc. (1970), 66 Misc.2d 779, 322 N.Y.S.2d 194, affirmed (1971), 36 A.D.2d 796, 320 N.Y.S.2d 1014 (<HOLDING>); In re Mines Tire Co., Inc.
holding the basic purpose of a financing statement is to provide notice to outside creditors that a secured claim has been perfected holding that where an outright buyer of accounts receivable failed to perfect her interest in debtors account by filing a financing statement the buyer could not prevail over the bankruptcy trustee as lien creditor holding that although a store had been doing business under the same trade name in the same location for two years prior to bankruptcy a financing statement which was filed only under the debtors trade name rendered the creditors claim unenforceable against the trustee holding a financing statement filed as nara dist inc sufficient to perfect creditors interest even though the correct name of the debtor was nara non food distributing inc holding that although a financing statement may be used to assist in the interpretation of the security agreement the financing statement does not create a security interest and cannot extend a security interest beyond what has been unambiguously described in a security agreement