unlawfully, intentionally or knowingly in the course of committing theft and with intent to obtain and maintain control of the property, cause bodily injury to Jason Jenson [sic] by striking Jason Jenson [sic] on the back and face, then you will find the defendant guilty of Robbery as charged in the indictment. The evidence showed that appellant grabbed Jason’s bike and tried to take it from him. During the incident, Jason received bruises to his back. Appellant also hit Jason in the mouth. Jason testified that his mother bought him the bicycle. Even though appellant did not gain possession of the bicycle from Jason, this is not necessary in order to be convicted of robbery. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 29.-02(a)(1) (Vernon 1989). See White v. State, 671 S.W.2d 40, 41 (Tex.Crim.App.1984) (<HOLDING>). Viewing the evidence in the light most
holding that no federal nexus is required holding that where no factual dispute is raised no hearing is required holding that no completed theft is required in order to constitute robbery holding denial of mandamus challenging arbitration order did not bar appeal of that order after arbitration was completed holding that the oral rendition of an order in open court does not constitute entry of that order