and regulation of the following classifications of “sexually-oriented businesses”: (1) Adult bookstores or adult video store; (2) Adult cabarets; (3) Adult motels; (4) Adult motion picture theaters; (5) Semi-nude model studios; (6) Sexual device shops; and (7) Sexual encounter centers. Plaintiffs’ challenge on U.S. and Tennessee constitutional grounds multiple provisions of the Ordinance. In the fall of 2004, the Knox County Commission undertook to update its ordinances regulating the operation of sexually-oriented businesses. The County contends that it relied upon relevant U.S. Supreme Court decisions such as City of Littleton v. ZJ Gifts, 541 U.S. 774, 124 S.Ct. 2219, 159 L.Ed.2d 84 (2004), and Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41, 106 S.Ct. 925, 89 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986) (<HOLDING>). 0.n February 22, 2005, in a joint meeting of
holding that a court may rely on otherwise inadmissible evidence including hearsay evidence at the preliminary injunction stage holding that it was not wrong for the administrator to rely on the findings of an independent reviewing physician recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice holding that a district court can rely on the probation report and is not required to make independent findings regarding the defendants financial resources holding that eities can rely on secondary effects from other jurisdictions including findings in previous judicial opinions