We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to recognize a foreign judgment, and we review de novo any underlying questions of law. Bird v. Glacier Elec. Coop., Inc., 255 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir.2001). We affirm. A federal court’s recognition of tribal court judgments is a matter of comity; such judgments are not entitled to full faith and credit. See Wilson v. Marchington, 127 F.3d 805, 807-09 (9th Cir.1997). Even if the Pembina court had jurisdiction to issue a judgment in favor of Reed, the district court properly rescinded the registration of that judgment because it conflicted with the Montana state court judgment, which was entitled to full faith and credit. See 28 U.S.C. § 1738; Wilson, 127 F.3d at 810 (<HOLDING>). Reed’s remaining contentions lack merit.
holding that a district court judgment is not a final judgment appealable by the defendant unless it includes the final adjudication and the final sentence holding that a federal court may decline to recognize a tribal judgment if it conflicts with another final judgment that is entitled to recognition recognizing that a final judgment may provide for a particular standard upon which to modify a final judgment holding if a judgment determines the applicable law while leaving open questions of fact it is not a final judgment holding that a judgment of another states court is entitled to full faith and credit j when the judgment is considered final under the laws of the rendering state