prior to the effective date of the new Georgia Evidence Code, former OCGA § 24-3-5 applies. 5 Appellant has filed a separate Motion to Remand in this case in which he makes the same argument as that contained in this enumeration of error. This motion hereby is denied. 6 We note that appellant only seeks permission on remand to supplement the record with trial counsel’s testimony in support of his claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel raised on motion for new trial and he has not raised on appeal an ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim against his first appellate counsel. Compare Lewis, 291 Ga. at 282 (remanding case for a hearing on the issue of ineffective assistance of first appellate counsel); Wilson v. State, 286 Ga. 141, 144-145 (686 SE2d 104) (2009)
recognizing that strickland applies to ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims holding that generally appellate courts will not review an issue raised for the first time on appeal holding that the defendants ineffective assistance of counsel claims which were raised in a motion for a new trial and challenged on direct appeal were not barred in postconviction by the doctrine of res judicata because the defendants conviction and sentence were affirmed without a written opinion expressly addressing the claims of ineffective assistance of counsel holding that defendants are entitled to effective assistance of appellate counsel on their first appeal as of right recognizing that ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claims not premised on procedurally barred claims can be raised for the first time on appeal by new appellate counsel and are not limited to habeas review