the court stated, id. at 772: “[I]t is inherent in the nature of wrongful death remedies that not every surviv- or is entitled to recover monetary damages. A line must be drawn; without the express terms of a statute to guide the Court, it must draw a boundary that is most in line with the purposes underlying creation of the remedy. This Court is in agreement with Truehart in concluding that a limit based upon dependence is in line with the philosophy of Moragne and subsequent cases.” Accordingly, the state claims asserted here by the parents of Scott Wahlstrom must be dismissed. In light of the decision to grant judgment against plaintiffs’ state wrongful death claim as a matter of law, any claim for punitive damages must also be dismissed. Cf. Neal v. Barisich, Inc., supra at 873 (<HOLDING>); cf. also Alcorn County, Miss. v. U.S.
holding punitive damages not recoverable for retaliatory discharge claim under general maritime law holding punitive damages unavailable for survival claims under general maritime law holding that nonpecuniary damages created under florida law were available in an admiralty action holding that because punitive damages are nonpecuniary a plaintiff has standing to seek them under the general maritime law only if having standing to seek other nonpecuniary losses holding that party standing in loco parentis has standing to seek custody of child