of the statute. Therefore, we hold that 42 Pa.C.S. § 9718.4 is unconstitutional in its entirety. Consequently, Appellant’s mandatory minimum sentence imposed in case 2393 is vacated, and we remand for resentencing in that case, without consideration of the mandatory minimum sentence set forth in 42 Pa.C.S. § 9718.4. Because Appellant raises no issue(s) concerning his judgments of sentence imposed in cases CP-02-CR-0002252-2014 and CP-02-CR-0003234-2014, we affirm those judgments of sentence. Judgment of sentence in CP-02-CR-0002393-2014 vacated. Case remanded for resentencing. Judgments of sentence in CP-02-CR-0002252-2014 and CP-02-CR-0003234-2014 affirmed. Jurisdiction relinquished. 1 . 18 Pa.C.S. § 4915.1(a)(1). 2 . See also Commonwealth v. Bizzel, 107 A.3d 102 (Pa. Super. 2014) (<HOLDING>); Commonwealth v. Valentine, 101 A.3d 801 (Pa.
holding that the proof at sentencing1 provision contained in 42 pacs  97121 is unconstitutional in light of alleyne and is not severable from the remainder of the statute holding unconstitutional 18 usc  922q as beyond congresss commerce clause power holding that 18 pacs  6317b is unconstitutional holding that 42 pacs  9712 and 9713 are unconstitutional holding that 18 usc  1919 did not implicitly repeal 18 usc  1001