or the method of providing police or fire protection.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex.1995) (“ ‘Thus, if the negligence causing an injury lies in the formulating of policy — ie., the determining of the method of police protection to provide — the government remains immune from liability.’ ”) (quoting State v. Terrell, 588 S.W.2d 784, 787-88 (Tex.1979)). Accordingly, we sustain the City’s issue with respect to Ballard’s claims based on negligent training and supervision of officers, for a ratified pattern of negligent handling and detainment of juvenile offenders by the City’s police force, and for the City’s “customs and policies.” C. Negligent Failure to Secure Mark in the Second Police Car Ballard asserted below, as he reass .W.3d 575, 580-81 (Tex.2001) (<HOLDING>); Norrell v. Gardendale Volunteer Fire Dep’t,
holding that claim for failure to monitor patient did not fall under ttcas property waiver holding that failure to furnish proper training instruction training manuals and documents to officer who injured plaintiff failure to provide adequate tests for that officer and failure to discipline that officer fell outside ttcas property waiver holding that the failure to object to an instruction constitutes a waiver of error holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver holding that ems training lieutenants position met criteria because the lieutenants developed coordinated implemented and conducted ems training programs  prepared lesson plans and training aids supervised delivery of training and tests and evaluated new equipment