rise to an inheritance. See Dillman v. Dillman, 409 Ill. 494, 502, 100 N.E.2d 567 (1951) (‘Heirs’ “designates all those persons, whether many or few, upon whom the law would cast the inheritance in case of intestacy”) (citations omitted); Black’s Law Dictionary 903 (10th ed. 2014) (An inheritance is generally “[property received from an ancestor under the laws of intestacy[,]” or by bequest or devise”). No one disputes that Cronin was survived only by his sister’s descendants, the Debtor and her siblings. He also died without a valid will. As a result, any funds that the Debt- or received from Cronin’s estate is an inheritance. As the Debtor became entitled to acquire the Inheritance on December 17, 2011 when Cronin passed away, see In re Chenoweth, 3 F.3d 1111, 1112 (7th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>), the Debtor was entitled to the Inheritance
holding that the relevant time of inquiry is the date of the filing of the complaint holding that the date of sale for an installment contract was the date of contract formation not the date of the last payment due holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act holding that section 10b violation occurs on date of alleged misrepresentation not the date of the sale or purchase of securities holding that the date of death is relevant date of inquiry for the applicability of section 541a5a