a hearing, the trial court denied the media defendants’ motion to dismiss without stating a basis and was not asked to make findings of fact or conclusions of law. The media defendants timely filed this accelerated appeal. See Combined Law Enforcement Ass’ns of Tex. v. Sheffield, No. 03-13-00105-CV, 2014 WL 411672, at *4 (Tex.App.-Austin Jan. 31, 2014, no pet. h.) (mem. op.) (determining that the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, as amended in 2013, confers jurisdiction over appeals filed pursuant to section 27.008 that are perfected before and active on the effective date of the amendment); Better Bus. Bureau of Metro. Houston, Inc. v. John Moore Servs., Inc., No. 01-12-00990-CV, — S.W.3d —, —, 2013 WL 3716693, at *2 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] July 16, 2013, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). ANALYSIS A. Procedure for Dismissal Under the
holding court had jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal in which trial court had denied an untimely motion to dismiss expert report holding an interlocutory appeal is allowed from the trial courts written order denying a motion to dismiss under the tcpa holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable holding an appeal may be taken from an order denying a motion to compel arbitration holding that a motion to certify a district court order for interlocutory appeal is dispositive