court that a settlement was made in good faith shall bar any other joint tortfeasor or co-obligor from any further claims against the settling tortfea-sor or co-obligor for equitable comparative contribution, or partial or comparative indemnity, based on comparative negligence' or comparative fault. Haw.Rev.Stat. § 663-11: "Joint tortfeasors” are "two or more persons jointly and severally liable in tort for the same injury to person or property, whether or not judgment has been- recovered against all or some of them.” 3 . See, e.g., Espaniola v. Cawdrey Mars Joint Venture, 68 Haw. 171, 707 P.2d 365 (1985) (finding that a contract allowing for indemnification between contractor and sub-contractor was not barred); AIG Haw. Ins. Co. v. Estate of Caraang, 74 Haw. 620, 851 P.2d 321 (1993) (<HOLDING>); see also, Kamali v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., 54
holding that the mcca was not obligated to indemnify a claim under a california automobile insurance policy that was reformed into a michigan nofault automobile insurance policy five years after the subject accident and stating that the mcca can refuse to indemnify claims paid under mcl 5003163 holding that a closing protection letter offering to indemnify a mortgage company was not an insurance contract where although issued by an insurance company there was no distribution of the risk holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract holding that there may be an obligation to defend under an insurance policy even though there is no obligation to indemnify holding that an insurance company had to indemnify defendant driver pursuant to policy because shooting that caused accident was determined to be accidental