in favor of the Federal Maritime Board in the context of federal claims); Western Pac. R.R. Co., 352 U.S. at 63-64, 77 S.Ct. 161 (applying the doctrine in favor of the Interstate Commerce Commission in the context of federal claims); In re Long Distance Telecommunications Litigation, 831 F.2d 627, 631-32, 634 (6th Cir.1987) (applying the doctrine in favor of the Federal Communications Commission in the context of federal claims). In County of Suffolk v. Long Island Lighting Co., the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals held that, subject to a narrow exception, the primary-jurisdiction doctrine does hot apply in favor of a state administrative agency where there is a federal claim at issue and where there are no competing federal forums. 907 F.2d 1295, 1310 (2d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). The Second Circuit chiefly reasoned that the
holding that courts have consistently treated a license or permit denial pursuant to a state or federal administrative scheme as an article iii injury holding that the exception applies where a state administrative agency operates pursuant to a federal legislative scheme holding that the power of any administrative agency to reconsider its final decision exists only where the statutory provisions creating the agency indicate a legislative intent to permit the agency to carry into effect such power holding that the state police is a state agency holding  2254 applies to administrative proceedings