source of funds used to purchase the Casino Property- The Court finds, however, that the Secretary’s decision to take the Casino Property into trust is reasonable and supported by ample evidence. After reviewing all relevant documents submitted by the Band, the OIGM analyst concluded that a preponderance of the evidence supported a finding that WELSA funds were exclusively used to purchase the Casino Property, and that there was a lack of evidence that other funds were used to purchase the Casino Property. When reviewing agency actions, the question is not whether the Court would have come to the same conclusion, but whether the agency conclusion is supported by a rational basis. Voyageurs Nat’l Park, 381 F.3d at 763; Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Dole, 828 F.2d 799, 804-05 (D.C.Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>). Based on the above, the Court finds that the
holding that the court should make factual findings from the record evidence as if it were conducting a trial on the record holding that the district court determines the amount of loss under the preponderance of the evidence standard holding that the district court is limited to considering the administrative record in reviewing the denial of benefits under an erisa plan holding that the apa does not permit a reviewing court to decide which side of the factual dispute it thinks the preponderance of the evidence in the administrative record falls on holding that under the substantial evidence standard the reviewing court must decide whether on this record it would have been possible for a reasonable jury to reach the agencys conclusion