giving rise to a 4-level enhancement under either version of the Guidelines Manual, U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(a). Alternatively, each was charged with the lesser included enhancements for their aggravated roles in the conspiracy giving rise to the 3-point enhancement of § 3B 1.1(b) or the 2-point enhancement under § 3Bl.l(c). 11 . A finding that a defendant willfully attempted to obstruct or impede the administration of justice during the course of the investigation, prosecution or sentencing of the offense of conviction and that the obstructive conduct related to the defendant's offense of conviction or a closely related offense, increases that defendant's offense level by 2 levels under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1. 12 . See Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 400 U.S. 455, 464, 91 S.Ct. 499, 27 L.Ed.2d 532 (1971) (<HOLDING>); see also Little v. Kern County Superior
holding that the judges recusal order effectively deprived that judge of authority to preside over the contempt proceedings holding that where criminal contempt charged has in it the element of personal criticism or attack upon the judge and where delay would not be impracticable a different judge should preside over the criminal contempt trial holding that an individual charged with criminal contempt is entitled to the full procedural protections afforded the defendant in any other criminal proceeding holding corporation and its president in criminal contempt because previous order of civil contempt had not been purged holding that an attorney charged with contempt for failing to attend a scheduled hearing could be charged only with indirect not direct contempt because the contempt did not occur in open court and the judge did not have personal knowledge of the reasons for the attorneys nonappearance