allegations often fail even to touch upon the elements necessary to prove breach of contract and unjust enrichment. For example, a breach of contract under Alabama law requires: “(1) the existence of a valid contract binding the parties in the action, (2) [the plaintiffs] own performance under the contract, (3) the defendant’s nonperformance, and (4) damages.” Southern Med. Health Sys., Inc. v. Vaughn, 669 So.2d 98, 99 (Ala.1995). Yet there is no reference to any contract in the complaint. Morrow’s allegation of unjust enrichment is likewise vague. Consequently, the court grants Morrow the opportunity to amend her complaint in order to plead her claims properly. The defendants alternatively argue that, even if Morrow’s claims for breach of contract and unjust 1348 (11th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>), with, e.g., Herman v. RSR Sec. Servs. Ltd.,
holding that the flsa does not preempt state law contract provisions that are more generous than the flsa demands holding that the flsa does not preempt a state law contractual claim that seeks to recover wages for time that is compensable under the contract but not under the flsa holding flsa did not preempt state law fraud claim holding under flsa holding that punitive damages are not allowed under the flsa