tending to cast suspicion thereon. Ragsdale, 801 S.W.2d at 882. In such a situation, the testimony is taken as true, as a matter of law. Id. This exception applies with special force when the interested witness’s testimony is capable of being readily controverted if untrue, yet is left uncontro-verted. Schwartz v. Pinnacle Communications, 944 S.W.2d 427, 434 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997, no writ). However, the Texas Supreme Court has cautioned that not every ease in which uncontradicted testimony is offered mandates an award of the amount claimed. Ragsdale, 801 S.W.2d at 882. A jury may still find uncontroverted testimony unreasonable if the attendant circumstances contradict the requested fees. See Stewart Title Guar. Co. v. Aiello, 911 S.W.2d 463, 477 (Tex.App.—El Paso 1995) (<HOLDING>), rev’d on other grounds, 941 S.W.2d 68
holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding that oncors request for the trial judge rather than the jury to determine the reasonableness of its attorneys fees and the failure to submit the question of attorneys fees to the jury resulted in a waiver of oncors claim for the recovery of attorneys fees holding that the court of appeals erred in modifying the judgment to include attorneys fees when the trial courts refusal to grant attorneys fees was not the subject of a point of error holding that no reason existed to create a uniform national rule in admiralty where the case concerned attorneys fees and whether the contractual provision which provided for attorneys fees should allow a party to recover attorneys fees where it succeeded on all but one minor issue holding it is not error for jury to reduce uncontested attorneys fees