to recover the monies owed under the Consulting Agreement.” R.65 ¶ 7. Although Segal did not file the C gument that disability payments under an insurance policy in which the debtor had a pre-petition interest were property of the estate under § 541(a)(6); although such payments were intended to be a substitute for earned wages, they were available only when a policyholder was incapable of performing services). 18 . This issue is arguably waived as Segal made a single reference to "personal services" in his 82-paragraph Answer in the underlying adversary proceeding, but did not raise this argument in his summary judgment opposition or at oral argument on the motion. See Buncher Co. v. Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of GenFarm Ltd. P’ship IV, 229 F.3d 245, 253 (3d Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). the Consulting Agreement payments as wages
holding that issues not raised before a district court are waived on appeal holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding arguments not raised on appeal waived holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal holding that where an issue is raised in the district court but raised late and the district court declines to deem the issue waived the issue may be raised on appeal