public concern include matters of political, social, and other concern to the community. See id. at 147-48, 103 S.Ct. 1684. In evaluating speech under the Connick framework, we examine the content, form, and context of the speech as revealed by the entire record. See id.; Shands, 993 F.2d at 1343. The defendants argue that Belk’s statements to Dolby did not address matters of public concern because (1) Belk’s statements were not made in a public setting, (2) Belk herself was motivated by a desire to spread gossip and animosity toward Link, and (3) her statements were “purely job-related.” 1. Content “We generally have e, while not dispositive, may also indicate that the issue is one of public concern. See Bowman v. Pulaski County Special School Dist., 723 F.2d 640, 644 (8th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). Not every statement made by a public employee
holding that regardless of insurers good faith denial of coverage plaintiff is entitled to recover interest to put it in position it would have been in if coverage had not been denied holding that the privacy interests of the employee police officers did not exceed the publics right to know holding that media coverage and citizen activism  are a good indication of the publics interest holding that the plaintiffs asserted legal basis for coverage is irrelevant to the determination of whether the insurance policy provides coverage and instead looking to the facts underlying the claim for coverage holding that access rights of the news media and of the general public are identical in scope