on the record. Section 508.120, RSMo 1986, also addresses the timeliness of a motion to disqualify a judge. It says: [N]o application by a defendant to disqualify a judge shall be granted unless the application therefor is made before the filing of his answer to the merits, except when the cause for the change of venue or disqualification arises, or information or knowledge of the existence thereof first comes to him, after the filing of his answer in which case the application shall state the time when the cause arose or when applicant acquired information and knowledge thereof, and the application must be made within five days thereafter. We must first determine if the motion for disqualification was timely under Rule 51.05. Hough v. Hough, 819 S.W.2d 751, 752 (Mo.App.1991) (<HOLDING>). The contempt hearing was to enforce Judge
holding that plea in bar may be based only on grounds set forth in statute holding that rule 5105 supersedes  508090 during the time period set forth in rule 5105 holding that oneyear limitations period set forth in  2255 is not a jurisdictional bar and is thus subject to equitable tolling holding that an agency filing deadline set forth in a regulation as a rule of administrative convenience is not jurisdictional recognizing rule