or the admissibility of evidence shall be determined by the court.... In making its determination it is not bound by the rules of evidence except those with respect to privileges."); also A.R.E. 104(a) (stating the identical Alaska rule). 23 . Daubert, 509 U.S. at 592, 113 S.Ct. at 2796 (footnotes omitted). 24 . Id. at 593-94, 113 S.Ct. at 2796-97. 25 . Id. 26 . Id. at 589, 113 S.Ct. at 2795. 27 . Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 141, 119 S.Ct. 1167, 1171, 143 L.Ed.2d 238 (1999). 28 . Id. at 150, 119 S.Ct. at 1175. 29 . Edward J. Imwinkelried, The Next Step After Daubert: Developing a Similarly Epistemological Approach to Ensuring the Reliability of Nonscientific Expert Testimony, 15 Cardozo L.Rev. 2271, 2285 (1994). 30 . See Kumho Tire, 526 U.S. at 14 1, 5 (1997) (<HOLDING>). 37 . See, eg., United States v. Griffin, 50
holding that a trial court abused its discretion by excluding the testimony of an expert witness where the testimony would have been relevant to show that the defendant breached a duty of care holding trial court acted within its discretion in excluding expert testimony holding that trial court erred in excluding material testimony when court misapprehended partys awareness of witness holding that the trial court had erred by excluding the expert testimony of a doctor holding that the trial court erred in excluding expert witness testimony that police interrogation tac tics made defendant susceptible to giving a false confession