stop because they.were based on an objectively reasonable concern for officer safety under the circumstances. At the time of the search, the officers were aware that they were in a neighborhood known for a high crime rate and drug activity. They were in a building at which they had just observed significant foot traffic suggesting ongoing drug sales; the officers observed at least one known drug user entering the building. They had noticed plastic bags on the floor of the entryway that we e officers believed that Moore was carrying a weapon and stated that “it is more likely that Joyce thought the defendant was concealing contraband.” Weapons such as knives and razors can, however, be concealed inside a closed fist. Cf. State v. Williams, 249 Neb. 582, 544 N.W.2d 350, 351-54 (1996) (<HOLDING>). In any event, as the district court
holding that even though the declarant was not in danger she was experiencing an ongoing emergency because she did not know where her children were and she feared for their safety holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination holding that a party has mental capacity if she appreciated the effect of what she was doing and understood the nature and consequences of her acts and the business she was transacting holding that the district court did not err in failing to address the defendant personally to determine whether she understood the rights she was waiving by admitting that she violated the conditions of her probation holding that forcing a suspect to open her closed fist was part of a terry frisk for weapons was justified because the officers could not determine what she was holding and were concerned that she might be holding a razor blade or knife