situation in the Houston Division is particularly acute. Due to an increase in both the number and complexity of criminal filings, the extremely crowded dockets, and several other factors, the trial track in the Houston Division is two to three years. By contrast, Defendant is well aware that the trial track in this Court is much shorter. Thus, in the instant case, the net effect of a transfer to the Houston Division would be to delay resolution. In the Court’s view it cannot seriously be contended that the interest of justice requires a transfer of venue under such circumstances. G. Plaintiffs Choice of Forum Numerous Courts in this Circuit have held that, subject to certain exceptions, the Plaintiffs choice of forum is entitled to great deference. United Sonics, 661 F.Supp., at 683 (<HOLDING>); McRae v. Sawyer, 660 F.Supp. 62, 65
holding that a domestic plaintiffs choice of forum is entitled to more deference than a foreign plaintiffs holding that trial courts determination of whether defendant accepted responsibility should not be disturbed unless it is without foundation holding that the court has personal jurisdiction over siemens germany and that defendants failed to overcome the presumption in favor of plaintiffs choice of forum holding that florida courts should always consider this third step of the forum non conveniens inquiry even if the private factors weigh more heavily in favor of the alternative forum and should require that the balance of public interests also be tipped in favor of the alternative forum in order to defeat the presumption favoring the plaintiffs forum choice holding that a plaintiffs choice of forum is most influential and should rarely be disturbed unless the balance is strongly in defendants favor