Debtor attended Penn between 1997 and 2001. 4 . There are seven (7) such notes dated between May 22, 1997 and September 27, 2000 written under the PENN Guaranteed Loan Program in principal amounts that aggregate $32,092. In addition, attached to Penn's proof of claim is a promissory note in favor of Penn dated August 31, 2000 in the amount of $1,500.00. 5 . As of the date of confirmation, two (2) separate claims secured by the Debtor’s residence were filed. These two (2) claims totaled $263,606.93. The Debtor’s confirmed plan provides for those claims through the surrender of the secured property. See 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(C). On August 14, 2007, presumably because a sale of the property had occurred resulting in no payment to the junior lienholder, one of the two claimants (TRF 86) (<HOLDING>). See generally In re Parker, 334 B.R. 529,
holding that university violated automatic stay by withholding chapter 13 debtors student transcript but that such action at bar did not rise to the level of contempt holding that a chapter 13 debtor should be able to obtain a copy of his transcript in light of the broader discharge provision of chapter 13 holding that state university violated 11 usc  362 and 525 by withholding debtors transcript where debt was dischargeable holding that refusal to provide chapter 7 debtor transcript because of default on student loan was a violation of the automatic stay based on the plain language of 11 usc  362 holding that university violated the automatic stay by withholding chapter 7 debtors transcripts because the debts were not yet determined nondischargeable