of permanent custody where the obligated parent is clearly able to prove substantial compliance with the award and satisfy the other Aeree factors, no principled basis exists to deny an award of credits for the payments. Such circumstances may be contrasted with and distinguished from those arising in cases where the change in custody is not permanent, the alternative payments are sporadic, inconsistent, and insufficient, the non-, obligated parent does not agree to the permanent change in the form of payment, and the non-conforming payments adversely affect the. children. Cf. Henderlite v. Henderlite, 3 Va.App. 539, 542, 351 S.E.2d 913, 914 (1987) (credit not allowed where mother did not agree to the alternate payments and there was no finding that the c 6 S.E.2d 666, 668 (1991) (<HOLDING>). Extending the Aeree exception to cases where
holding that only relevant factors must be considered holding that the trial judge erred in not considering factors other than the number of black venirepersons excluded in ruling on the defendants prima facie case holding that after determining presumptive amount under guidelines court must determine whether parties agreement would better serve childs interest holding that trial court must determine presumptive amount under guidelines before considering other factors holding that federal courts must ensure that they have jurisdiction before considering the merits of a case