He, thereafter, failed to return the fee to Ms. Nelson. We agree with Judge Greenberg that Respondent’s actions violate Rule 8.4(c). An attorney violates Subsection (d) of Rule 8.4 when he or she “engage[s] in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.” We have previously held that an attorney violates Rule 8.4(d) when he or she willfully fails to attend a hearing on behalf of his or her client. See Shakir, 427 Md. at 206, 46 A.3d at 1168; Attorney Grievance v. Dominguez, 427 Md. 308, 325-26, 47 A.3d 975, 985 (2011). An attorney can also violate 8.4(d) by failing to pursue his or her client’s objectives, failing to communicate with his or her client, or withholding unearned fees. See McCulloch, 404 Md. at 401, 946 A.2d at 1017; Tinsky, 377 Md. at 651, 835 A.2d at 545 (<HOLDING>). Here, Respondent did not appear on behalf of
holding that an attorney violated rule 84d when he attempted to charge his client whom he had agreed to represent for free because defendants view of the judicial process would be tainted holding that an attorneys filing a notice of appearance on behalf of his or her client constitute a waiver of service of process by the client holding that an attorney violated rule 84d when he failed to perform any effective action on behalf of his client holding that an attorney violated mlrpc 84d by faffing to inform his client of the dismissal of his clients complaint holding trial court erred when it sanctioned client where the evidence showed that the attorney filed frivolous pleadings on behalf of the client but the client did nothing more than rely on her attorneys advice