Sylvie at the time he purportedly married Geraldine. Dubie was still married to Sylvie becaus p.1966) (re fusing to uphold validity of Mexican divorce decree where parties, residents and domicili-aries of Louisiana, went to Mexico for sole purpose of obtaining divorce); Sohnlein v. Winchell, 230 Cal.App.2d 508, 41 Cal.Rptr. 145, 146-47 (1964) (refusing to recognize Mexican divorce decree where party stayed in Mexico for only two or three days, after which decree was issued, and holding that “where the foreign jurisdiction has no legitimate interest in the status of the parties, or where the sole purpose of seeking the divorce in the foreign jurisdiction is to evade the policy of this state, the judgment should not be recognized”); Cross v. Cross, 94 Ariz. 28, 381 P.2d 573, 574 (1963) (<HOLDING>). Neither Dubie nor Sylvie was domiciled in the
holding parties to an exculpatory clause where the parties intent is clear holding that the judgment was entered without jurisdiction and was therefore a nullity holding that mexican divorce was a nullity and totally void where parties were not residents of mexico because mexican court  did not have the slightest semblance of jurisdiction to adjudicate the marital status of the parties holding that a district courts order of dismissal with prejudice was a nullity because the court lacked jurisdiction holding that parties can stipulate that they were both parties to a contract and thus the real parties in interest even when one party did not sign the contract