be committed and to support the investigatory stop or detention of a suspect: The time; the day of the week; the location; the physical appearance of the suspect; the behavior of the suspect; the appearance and manner of operation of any vehicle involved; anything incongruous or unusual in the situation as interpreted in the light of the officer’s knowledge. To this list may be added, the factor of flight. Hernandez, 784 So.2d at 1126 (citations omitted). In the instant case, although the initial consensual contact between Officer Sanchez and the defendant did not require Officer Sanchez to have a reasonable suspicion, once Officer Sanchez stopped the defendant and asked whether he had any weapons in his possession, the encounter became an investigative stop. Popple, 626 So.2d at 186 (<HOLDING>); State v. Wilson, 566 So.2d 585, 586 (Fla. 2d
holding that an officer making a traffic stop may order passengers to exit the car pending completion of the stop holding that once the officer asked the defendant to exit his vehicle the encounter became a stop because the defendant was no longer free to leave holding that the officer acted within the scope of his authority in requiring the defendant stopped in middle lane of traffic to exit his vehicle holding that by the time the officer asked the defendant if he could frisk him the encounter had evolved into a stop holding that the encounter between an officer and the defendant did not rise to the level of a terry stop until the defendant gave the officer his license and the officer informed the defendant that he was going to be given a patdown