(Shiff, J.) (Chapter 13 plan not barred from modifying claim secured by debtor’s principal residence and two rental units in which debtors do not reside.). The debtor, in her memorandum, requests this court not to follow Moreland and Spano and to accept the construction adopted by Third Circuit rulings — that if a mortgagee takes a security interest in any of the above-identified items, the mortgage, under the express terms of § 1322(b)(2), takes security interests in property other than the real property. Sapos v. Provident Inst. of Sav., 967 F.2d 918, 925 (3d Cir.1992) (Security interest in wall-to-wall carpeting and rents and profits placed claim outside the anti-modification provision of § 1322(b)(2).); Wilson v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corp., 895 F.2d 123, 128-29 (3d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); In re Hammond, 27 F.3d 52, 57-58 (3d
holding alternatively that rights of undersecured claimant could be modified notwithstanding  1322b2 because mortgagees security interest which attached to appliances machinery furniture and equipment whether fixtures or not was not secured only by a security interest in real property holding security interest in insurance premiums perfected by creation of security interest holding that the trustee could not avoid a security interest under section 549 when that security interest was authorized by the bankruptcy court holding that although a financing statement may be used to assist in the interpretation of the security agreement the financing statement does not create a security interest and cannot extend a security interest beyond what has been unambiguously described in a security agreement holding that under virginia law a banks security interest which secured a loan made to refinance preexisting debt was a nonpossessory nonpurchasemoney security interest