at trial. This case arose following the murder of Kiniun’s mother, Gloria Strickland, and the subsequent refusal of several insurance companies to pay out her death benefits to Kiniun. Kiniun filed complaints against these insurance companies because they refused to pay out the insurance proceeds while Kiniun was a suspect in his mother’s murder. Kiniun brings three issues on appeal, which we address in turn. After review, we affirm the district court. Summary judgment Kiniun first contends the district court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment. However, because the case proceeded to a full trial and judgment on the merits, we will not review the denial of Kiniun’s motion for summary judgment. See Lind v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 254 F.3d 1281, 1286 (11th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Evidentiary rulings Second, Kiniun asserts
holding that denial of motion for summary judgment is interlocutory even though trial judge had stated that there was no just reason for delay because denial of motion for summary judgment was not a final determination of defendants rights and the appeal did not affect defendants substantial rights recognizing that we can consider trial evidence in reviewing the denial of a pretrial suppression motion holding that the courts denial of either a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment and is not reviewable  holding we will not review a pretrial denial of a motion for summary judgment after a full trial and judgment on the merits holding that a grant of summary judgment in favor of one party creates a final judgment allowing appellate review of denial of opposing partys summary judgment motion