Title VII’s charge-filing requirement when he filed an unverified Intake Questionnaire within the statutory time period for filing a charge and then filed a verified formal charge outside that time period. (Unlike the ADEA, Title VII requires a charge to be filed under oath or affirmation. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(b).) Relying on the EEOC regulations that allow a charge to be amended to cure technical defects including the lack of verification, the court reached the "inescapable conclusion that the completed Intake Questionnaire, in the context of both the amendment procedures and the liberality to be ascribed to procedural requirements, is sufficient to constitute a charge." Id. at 1443. Contra Profit v. Keycom Electronic Publishing, 625 F.Supp. 400, 403-04 (N.D.Ill.1985) (Shadur, J.) (<HOLDING>), overruled on other grounds, Gilardi v.
holding that such a theory is viable under title vii holding that there is no individual liability under title vii holding that until a document is submitted under oath or affirmation there is no title vii charge to be amended holding individual employees may be liable under title vii holding that relief granted under title vii is against the employer not individual employees whose actions constituted a violation of title vii emphasis in original