efforts. The testimony also revealed that HHI ramped up its due diligence efforts in the period leading up to the July 20 hearing. 6 .Ciara Donohoe, a managing director with RHJI, testified that RHJI determined that it would be preferable to wait until closer to the July 23 hearing to deliver the satisfaction notice. While the Court does not doubt RHJI's good faith in refusing to send the satisfaction notice earlier, it is undisputed that RHJI did not send the satisfaction notice until 2:11 p.m. on July 23, after RHJI was notified about HHI's bid that had no due diligence out. 7 . As is further explained below, while the Court does not substitute its business judgment for the Debtors', based on the evidence presented, the Court agrees that H , 994 F.2d 744, 746 (10th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). 14 .Macakanja's calculations assumed a 10-20%
holding that bankruptcy court may issue proposed findings and conclusions in a core proceeding over which the bankruptcy court does not have constitutional authority holding that the bankruptcy court has the inherent power to award sanctions for badfaith conduct in a bankruptcy court proceeding holding that a claim arises from the purchase or sale of a security only if there is an allegation of fraud in the purchase sale or issuance of the  instrument holding that a bankruptcy court does have the power to disapprove a proposed sale recommended by a debtor if it has an awareness there is another proposal in hand which from the estates point of view is better or more acceptable holding that it is prejudicial to indicate to the jury that the plaintiff has or may have another remedy  