to be several agreements and hence several conspiracies because it envisages the violation of several statutes rather than one.”). Likewise, Rodriguez cannot be convicted for both felony-murder and first-degree murder after deliberation for the murder of a single victim. See People v. Glover, 893 P.2d 1311, 1314 (Colo.1995); People v. Lowe, 660 P.2d 1261, 1269-71 (Colo.1983); see also infra part XV. Throughout his brief, and particularly in Issue 13, Rodriguez argues that the vacation of the duplicative convictions mandates vacation of his death sentence because “[t]he death verdict is tainted by the consideration of illegal convictions and is itself illegal and unreliable.” Rodriguez’ Opening Brief at 96; see Johnson v. Mississippi, 486 U.S. 578, 108 S.Ct. 1981, 100 L.Ed.2d 575 (1988) (<HOLDING>). As stated in part I of this opinion, the
holding that denial of outofcell exercise for an extended period violates the eighth amendment holding that execution of a defendant who commits a capital crime while under the age of eighteen is prohibited by the eighth amendment holding that a capital sentencer violates the eighth amendment by considering a conviction which is later reversed as unconstitutional holding that a conviction even when later reversed creates a rebuttable presumption of probable cause holding that the execution of mentally retarded criminals violates the eighth amendment