in the absence of a specific venue provision in the Act, the general venue statute controls, allowing non-resident minors to petition any circuit court for a waiver. See Lane v. Hemophilia of the Sunshine State, Inc., 793 So.2d 992, 994 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (explaining that “[t]he general venue statute controls all actions brought ... pursuant to a statute not containing specific provisions concerning- venue”) (citing Gaboury v. Flagler Hosp., Inc., 316 So.2d 642 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)). The Act does not expressly prohibit nonresidents from seeking an abortion in the State of Florida; nor does it expressly prohibit non-residents wanting to obtain an abortion in Florida from seeking a judicial bypass in Florida. See Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179, 200, 93 S.Ct. 739, 751, 35 L.Ed.2d 201 (1973) (<HOLDING>); Indiana Planned Parenthood Affiliates Ass’n,
holding that when mississippi adopted a statute modeled after a georgia enactment decisions of the georgia courts did not bind mississippi courts in interpretation of the statute holding that the georgia criminal abortion statute does not criminalize a pregnant womans actions in securing an abortion regardless of the means used recognizing courts duty to reconcile opinions from the georgia supreme court holding unconstitutional the provision in a georgia abortion statute limiting abortions to georgia residents recognizing twoyear statute of limitations for section 1981 claims filed in federal court in georgia