v. McDaniels, 512 F.3d 193, 197-98 (5th Cir.2007) (per curiam). However, May-field has not alleged any physical injury and his complaint seeks only compensatory damages. As such, Mayfield’s claims for damages are barred by § 1997e(e). See Geiger 404 F.3d at 375 (applying § 1997e(e) to bar prisoner’s claim for damages brought under § 1983 alleging a First Amendment violation); RLUIPA, 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2(e) (“Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to amend or repeal the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (including provisions of law amended by that Act).”); Cutter v. Wilkinson, 544 U.S. 709, 723, 125 S.Ct. 2113, 161 L.Ed.2d 1020 (2005) (noting that RLUIPA claims are subject to the exhaustion requirement of § 1997e(a)); see also Smith v. Allen, 502 F.3d 1255, 1271 (11th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). Neither sovereign nor qualified immunity
holding that provisions in a subcontract incorporating a prime contract for a limited purpose are limited only to those that are applicable recognizing a state agencys powers are limited to 1 recognizing that claims arising under the ihra are analyzed under the same standards as title vii claims recognizing that claims against a state under  1981 are barred by the eleventh amendment recognizing that damage claims under rluipa are limited by  1997ee