resign, Mr. Moreno created a fictitious debt that petitioner owed. Petitioner was forced to remain at the agency until the false claim was resolved. Even after petitioner left the agency, the state police kidnaped him at gunpoint, tortured him, and told him to lie to investigators about products in the fire-stricken warehouse owned by the state. Petitioner’s exposure of the government corruption to his supervisor, Ms. Martinez, and his refusal to accede to Mr. Moreno’s corrupt demands, are acts which constitute political activity and qualify petitioner as a whistleblower of government corruption. Repeatedly exposing the corruption to his supervisor was adequate; he did not need to report it to an outside agency to qualify as a whistleblower of government corruption. See id. at 1129-30 (<HOLDING>); Njuguna, 374 F.3d at 768-71 (holding that an
holding that summary judgment for defendant officials on the basis of qualified immunity was improper given officials indefinite refusal to treat plaintiffs cavity holding that opposition to government corruption may constitute political opinion holding that an aliens refusal to comply with extortion demands by officials and his reporting the corruption to higher officials was political and was whistleblowing activity holding that persecution was on account of political opinion because petitioners prosecutorial investigation into acts of political corruption was by its very nature political holding that alleged misconduct by public officials particularly by law enforcement officials is matter of public concern