relies upon original information provided directly by the terrorists organizations themselves. As it relates to Azzam Publications, Mr. Kolhm-ann has tracked the organization since nearly its founding and has expert knowledge concerning its internet activities and support for jihad. In commenting on an expert’s reliance on hearsay in Locascio, the Second Circuit explained that the issue is whether the evidence on which the expert relies is “[o]f a type reasonably relied upon by experts in the particular field. Fed.R.Evid. 703.... An expert who meets the test of Rule 702 ... is assumed to have the skill to properly evaluate the hearsay, giving it probative force appropriate to the circumstances.” Locascio, 6 F.3d at 938 (quotation marks and emphasis omitted); see Damrah, 412 F.3d at 625 (<HOLDING>). In Paracha, Judge Stein rejected a similar
holding that the district court properly admitted expert testimony under daubert that was based on inter alia the doctors clinical experience and review of the medical records holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony based on inter alia books press releases and newspaper articles and quoting the district courts opinion that given the secretive nature of terrorists the court can think of few other materials that experts in the field of terrorism would rely upon holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing expert testimony from the director of a center specializing in serving victims of sexual exploitation holding district court did not abuse its discretion in ruling on summary judgment motion where inter alia plaintiff had been given repeated notices court intended to rule on motion and it was plaintiffs burden to rebut defendants evidence holding that trial court didnot abuse its discretion in admitting experts opinion which was based primarily on his own experience in the field