coinsureds under landlord’s fire insurance policy). 4 . When the lease is silent on liability for negligence, other courts have found, because of additional facts, that a tenant is a coinsured and thus not liable. See Alaska Ins. Co. v. RCA Alaska Communications, 623 P.2d 1216 (Alaska 1981) (employing reasonable expectations analysis, court found tenant coinsured of landlord looking to other lease provisions); Parsons Mfg. Corp., Inc. v. Superior Court, 156 Cal.App.3d 1151, 203 Cal.Rptr. 419 (Ct.App.1984) (placing burden to insure on landlord because lease adverted to possibility of fire and had no contrary language); Safeco Ins. Co. v. Weisgerber, 115 Idaho 428, 767 P.2d 271 (1989) (denying subrogation action against tenant because looking to other lease provision, landlo 142 (1976) (<HOLDING>); Rizzuto v. Morris, 22 Wash.App. 951, 592 P.2d
holding that public policy must be evidenced by constitutional or statutory provisions holding that the damage for tenancy at sufferance during the holdover period was the monthly rent under the lease versus the apartments fair market value because the lease contained a provision requiring lease payments beyond the lease term holding that after township acquired property entered into lease with tenant that was renewable absent notice of termination and terminated lease tenant was not displaced person because tenant will be moving not as a result of the acquisition  of such real property but rather because township having already acquired the property has merely declined to renew the lease quotation omitted holding landlord may recover from tenant for fire damage caused by tenants negligence regardless of existence of insurance holding other lease provisions evidenced intent to relieve tenant from fire damage liability