of another at night.” Id. § 221.1(2). This grading scheme suggests that burglary of a dwelling is a species of burglary and that any limitations on “generic burglary” should also apply to “generic burglary of a dwelling.” On the other hand, the MPC defines “structure” more broadly than Taylor does. According to the MPC, “ ‘occupied structure’ means any structure, vehicle or place adapted for overnight accommodation of persons, or for carrying on business therein, whether or not a person is actually present.” Id. § 221.0(1). Therefore, under the MPC, burglary of a vehicle could be a felony in the second degree if the vehicle, such as a house boat or a mobile home, was adapted for overnight accommodations. See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Nixon, 2002 PA Super 191, 801 A.2d 1241, 1244-46 (2002) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, the MPC recognizes that burglary
recognizing that under pennsylvanias burglary statute which is nearly identical to the mpc camp structures and house trailers may be considered adapted for overnight accommodation holding that a claim under pennsylvanias consumer protection law among other claims could not be brought against the retailer for alleged overpayment of tax because the administrative remedy was exclusive recognizing that test for counsel ineffectiveness under strickland and pierce is identical recognizing that the governments failure to prevail is a factor that may be considered holding that pennsylvanias test for ineffective assistance of counsel is not contrary to strickland