and Exploited Children, in connection with a report submitted thereto under section 227 of the Victims of Child Abuse Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13032); or (6) to any person other than a governmental entity. 18 U.S.C. § 2702(c). 40 . If this analysis is correct, then phone companies disclosing customer information based on dual orders may be acting in violation of the SCA. A person or entity knowingly violating the SCA may be liable in a civil action for actual damages (a minimum of $1000 per violation), punitive damages, reasonable attorney fees, and costs. 18 U.S.C. § 2707(c). Immunity is provided if the phone company acts in good faith reliance upon a court order. 18 U.S.C. §§ 2703(e), 2707(e)(1). See McCready v. EBay, Inc., No. 05-2450, 05-3043, 2006 WL 1881142 (7th Cir. July 10, 2006) (<HOLDING>). 41 . See Police Access to Advanced
holding that taxpayer who is the target but not the recipient of an administrative subpoena pursuant to 26 usc  7602 may challenge the subpoena holding that a denial of an order to quash a subpoena not directed to a movant was a final order if the movant had no further opportunity to challenge the subpoena holding motion to enforce subpoena filed in district court where plaintiff served subpoena was nondispositive because resolution thereof would not dispose of complaint pending in other district court holding that the good faith defense protected ebay from liability for releasing information pursuant to a subpoena issued by a federal district court where there was no indication of irregularity sufficient to put ebay on notice that the subpoena was phony  holding that the term timely should be read in conjunction with 45c2b that requires a party subject to a subpoena to object to a subpoena duces tecum within 14 days of service of the subpoena