CURIAM. Joseph Bryan Flynn appeals the trial court’s final order adopting the general magistrate’s Report and Recommendation dismissing Flynn’s petition seeking to establish paternity,- time-sharing, and other related relief. Because the minor child was born to the intact marriage of Amber and Christopher McCraney, we affirm the final order in all respects. See Slowinski v. Sweeney, 64 So.3d 128, 128-29 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (<HOLDING>); see also Sirdevan v. Strand, 120 So.3d 1280
holding that a child born to an intact marriage cannot be the subject of a paternity proceeding brought by a biological father and determining it was fundamental error for the trial court to grant relief pursuant to a nonexistent cause of action recognizing the concept of dual paternity in which a child born into a marriage with a nonbiological father retains a legal parentchild relationship based on presumptive fatherhood for purposes of legitimacy and inheritance while becoming the child of a newlyestablished biological father for purposes of child support holding that the biological father was not entitled to notice of adoption proceeding where he failed to properly legitimate his child holding that a child was not barred by a former statute of limitations applicable to actions to establish the existence of a father and child relationship when the current action was to establish the nonexistence of a father and child relationship and the presumed father no longer persisted in maintaining paternity holding that alleged biological father who sought to establish paternity waived constitutional error though it was undisputed that father had received no notice or hearing on prior paternity adjudication that created bar