protections afforded under the [New Jersey Protection of Domestic Violence Act] are intended for the benefit of victims of domestic violence and are not meant to serve as a pretext for obtaining information to advance a criminal investigation against an alleged abuser”). Instead, we believe the Legislature intended for the findings, which result from an emergency hearing pursuant to section 20-4-50(a), to be temporary and confined to the Order of Protection. Implicit in this conclusion is that these findings cannot be used in future litigation unless they are confirmed in a subsequent hearing on the merits. In reaching this conclusion, we need look no further than the terms of the Act. See Beattie v. Aiken County Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 319 S.C. 449, 452, 462 S.E.2d 276, 278 (1995) (<HOLDING>); Id. (“ ‘A statute as a whole must receive a
holding that the primary goal when interpreting an insurance contract is to ascertain the intent of the parties as manifested by the language of the specific insurance policy recognizing that in interpreting a statute our primary purpose is to ascertain the intent of the legislature holding courts must adhere to legislative intent when interpreting a statute recognizing the legal concept that when interpreting a statute it is presumed that the legislature did not intend an absurd or unreasonable result holding that in interpreting a contract the actual purpose and intent of the parties must be derived