that prohibited the recognition of contracts entered into by unlawful aliens. United States v. Alabama, 691 F.3d 1269, 1292-95 (11th Cir.2012), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 133 S.Ct. 2022, 185 L.Ed.2d 905 (2013). Because the law essentially prevented aliens “from enforcing contracts for basic necessities” in derogation of the ability to live and conduct daily affairs, the court concluded that the measure’s effect of forcing undocumented aliens out of the state interfered with the exclusive federal power to expel aliens, as well as with the INA’s comprehensive scheme governing the removal of aliens. Id. at 1293-94. The Farmers Branch ordinance is just as invidious because its adverse effect on housing also precludes aliens from obtaining an essential human requirement. Cf. id. at 1299 n. 25 (<HOLDING>). Farmers Branch, like Alabama, “has
recognizing such an exception holding that the failure to notify aliens counsel of an order to appear for deportation violated the aliens statutory right to counsel holding a municipality liable for negligently maintaining a sewer where despite extraordinary rainfall the unclogged sewer may have prevented damage to the plaintiffs property holding that an aliens express waiver of his right to appeal to the bia deprives this court of jurisdiction to consider the aliens subsequent petition for review recognizing that depriving aliens of basic needs such as water garbage and sewer services  amounted to an impermissible policy of expulsion