specifications ... [Portland] reserves the right to set forth additional requirements if deemed necessary, (emphasis added). The Requirements potentially affect use of the land beyond the pipeline easement itself. Section 5.1.1 requires notification of any blasting proposed within “300 feet of [Portland’s] facilities.” Portland paints itself as the picture of flexibility in applying the Requirements and insists that it would permit certain uses, such as parking lots or access roads, on or near the pipeline easement. Nonetheless, as it concedes, it would have to do a project-by-project review to ensure safe and effective operation of the pipeline. Thus, from the viewpoint of the prospective purchaser, the Requirements introduce a hassle f an County, 197 F.3d 1368, 1374 (11th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). B. Partial Takings As the parties agree,
holding that federal law governs remedies available under title ix holding that federal common law governs equitable remedies available under erisa holding that under fedrcivp 71a federal procedure governs condemnation actions brought under the natural gas act holding that fedrcivp 4d1 governs the method of service of process in a diversity action holding that the natural gas act authorizes acquisition of gas storage easements by eminent domain