of introducing a plane into the stream of Georgia’s commerce. Judgments in 51911, 51912 and 51915 reversed; judgment in 51914 affirmed. Quillian, J., concurs. Webb, J., concurs in the judgments only. 1 McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 355 U. S. 220, 222 (78 SC 199, 2 LE2d 223). 2 See e.g., Lafayette Ins. Co. v. French, 59 U. S. (18 How. 404) (15 LE 451); St. Clair v. Cox, 106 U. S. 350 (1 SC 354, 27 LE 222). 3 See e.g., Green v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., 205 U.S. 530 (27 SC 595, 51 LE 916); Philadelphia &c. R. Co. v. McKibbin, 243 U. S. 264 (37 SC 280, 61 LE 70). 4 See e.g., Henrietta Min. & Mill. Co. v. Johnson, 173 U. S. 221 (19 SC 402, 43 LE 675); St. Louis S. W. R. Co. v. Alexander, 227 U. S. 218 (33 SC 245, 57 LE 486). 5 See Agrashell, Inc. v. Bernard Lirota Co., 344 F2d 583 (<HOLDING>); Webb v. Stanker & Galetto, Inc., 84 N. J.
holding in mcgee limited to suits involving contract of insurance holding that even if an insurance broker is the agent of the insurance company for purposes of soliciting and procuring the policy that would not necessarily make the broker the agent of the insurance company for the purpose of receiving notice of suits and claims holding that plaintiff could recover medical fees not actually paid by the insurance company pursuant to an insurance contract holding that suits which seek no recovery from state funds but rather allege that recovery is sought under and up to the limits of the states liability insurance coverage fall outside the traditional constitutional bar to suits against the state holding in a case involving denial of coverage under an insurance contract that the location of documentary evidence related to insurance coverage mattered less than the location of the underlying tort suits