and climbing short distances due to the back and knee pain, no impairment in fine or gross motor activities of the upper extremities, and a slight degenerative arthritis in the right knee. (R. 465). Collectively, these physicians’ notes, while acknowledging Corson’s chronic neck and back pain, do not indicate that Corson has become totally disabled as a result. Instead, the opinions suggest a sedentary work capacity, as the ALJ concluded. Therefore, the ALJ correctly concluded that Corson’s testimony regarding her vocational capacity in light of the neck and back pain was not credible. Corson also argues that the ALJ failed to consider Corson’s work record in evaluating her credibility. Plaintiffs Memorandum at 30. See generally Janas v. Barnhart, 451 F.Supp.2d 483, 501 (W.D.N.Y. 2006) (<HOLDING>); Rivera v. Schweiker, 717 F.2d 719, 725 (2d
holding that a good work history may be deemed probative of credibility holding that in determining the propriety of summary judgment credibility determinations may not be made  holding that a number of errors may be deemed harmful in their cumulative effect recognizing that history of domestic violence provides good cause for declarants absence holding that history of dishonesty can support an adverse credibility finding