a Somalian interpreter and mental health resources during the encounter. Hassan also argues official immunity does not apply because the officers were disorganized and their tasers did not function properly. However, as previously stated, nothing in the record suggests the officers engaged in any willful or malicious acts. Rather, the undisputed evidence in this case shows the officers were only trying to protect themselves and others from a dangerous man brandishing a machete and tire iron on a public street and then in the parking lot of a strip mall. Furthermore, Hassan does not indicate how the individual defendants’ handling of the situation or their conduct was so different from expected conduct that discrimination was the probable explanation. Beaulieu, 518 N.W.2d at 572 (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks and alterations
holding official immunity is available in claims of discrimination if plaintiff fails to establish his treatment by defendants was so at variance with what would reasonably be anticipated absent racial discrimination that racial discrimination is the probable explanation holding that title vii proscribes racial discrimination against whites upon the same standards as racial discrimination against nonwhites holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort holding to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination a plaintiff must show he 1