so at those times and places is not so clear. The log books kept as a record of those Masses contain virtually no entries other than the weekly “Mass celebrated by Fr.__Two in attendance.” They confirm the testimony that Masses were conducted. The defendant municipality argues that the court must examine the quantu es broad protections of religious freedom. N.J. Const, art. I, ¶¶3 and 4. Such protections extend to exemptions from taxation on real and personal property used exclusively for religious purposes. Id. at art. VIII, § 1, H 2. The exemption from taxation provided for religious organizations by the New Jersey Constitution is not absolute. See, e.g., New Life Gospel Church v. State, 257 N.J.Super. 241, 608 A.2d 397 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 133 N.J. 429, 627 A.2d 1136 (1992) (<HOLDING>); Bethany Baptist Church v. Deptford Tp., 225
holding where exempt organization was in possession of real property under land contract obligating organization to pay the purchase price and use land for exempt purpose the association was the owner of the land within the meaning of the statute holding exempt under ors 307130 which relates to other charitable institutions a building that was used as an office for a religious official and religious court and a printing press for a religious publication holding that the imposition of a life sentence on a juvenile does not violate the holding of roper holding that imposition of government fees did not violate exempt status of religious organization holding that imposition of social security taxes on persons who object to the receipt or payment of public insurance benefits on religious grounds does not violate the first amendment