of a complaint presumes all of plaintiffs factual allegations are true and construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Hall v. Bellmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1109 (10th Cir.1991). “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim for relief that is plausible on its face.’” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007)). Plausibility, in the context of a motion to dismiss, means that the plaintiff pled facts which allow “the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.” Id. If the allegations st 46, 1249 (D.Colo.2003) (<HOLDING>); Krauss v. Catholic Health Initiatives
holding that a wrongful discharge claim is not available given the availability of title yii remedies holding that to assert a claim for wrongful discharge from employment that is cognizable under the phra an aggrieved party must utilize administrative remedies available through the phrc before asserting a cause of action in court recognizing cause of action for wrongful discharge recognizing tort of wrongful discharge holding that federal law governs remedies available under title ix