and Bank of Thailand do not belong to the same consortium, but each has an account at New York Bank. To begin the transfer, ABC instructs India National Bank to transfer $100 to XYZ’s account at Bank of Thailand. India National Bank then debits ABC's account and forwards the instruction to New York Bank. New York Bank then debits India National’s account and credits Bank of Thailand’s account. Bank of Thailand then credits XYZ’s account, thereby completing the transfer. Id. at 60 n. 1. 2 . This lack of definition is apparent in the myriad approaches taken by district courts tasked with interpreting TRIA’s and FSIA § 1610(g)'s provisions allowing execution upon the assets "of" a terrorist state. See, e.g., Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 885 F.Supp.2d 429, 443 (D.D.C.2012) (<HOLDING>); see also, e.g., Bennett v. Islamic Republic
holding that both tria  201 and fsia  1610g require plaintiffs to prove some terrorist state ownership in order to attach and execute on property and finding that ownership interest through federal interstitial rule making holding despite contrary authority that husband debtor with a mere possessoiy interest was not entitled to claim a homestead exemption and stating it is a fundamental tenet of the law of exemptions that the debtor must have an ownership interest in the property before an exemption may be claimed a long line of illinois cases has required that a debtor have title or some ownership interest in property in order to claim a homestead exemption other courts deciding the issue under the federal exemption scheme have held that the key word is interest and that an interest in real property up to a specified amount implies a monetary interest more than just one spouses right to reside with the other holding that the term sold  requires both a transfer of ownership to an unrelated party and consideration recognizing that partnership property is a type of ownership holding that term sold requires both a transfer of ownership to an unrelated party and consideration