jurisdiction for more than ten days ” and convicted sex offenders are “required to ... notify the attorney general in writing of any change in name, employment, or residence address within three working days of the change ” (emphases added)). Moreover, sex offender registration requirements generally involve “actions taken by agencies the court does not control.” Nguyen, 81 Hawai'i at 288, 916 P.2d at 698. See also Sanchez v. United States, 572 F.2d 210, 211 (9th Cir.1977) (explaining that revocation of parole is collateral and not a direct consequence of guilty plea because “parole board has authority separate and distinct from that of the sentencing judge”); In re Resendiz, 105 Cal.Rptr.2d 431, 19 P.3d at 1179 (explaining that the deportation consequences do not “ine , 210 (2000) (<HOLDING>); see Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Leidig,
holding that the alaska sex offender registration act did not violate the ex post facto clause holding that since sex offender registration was not a direct consequence of the plea the failure to warn of such a requirement did not render the pleas unknowing or unintelligent holding that an inaccurate sentencing estimate did not render a plea unknowing unintelligent or involuntary because the defendant was informed of the statutory maximum holding that the sanction of deportation is a collateral not direct consequence of a guilty plea holding that the public disclosure provision of connecticuts sex offender registration law did not violate the due process clause