eight-hour seminar on chemonucleolysis was insufficient to satisfy the statute’s knowledge requirement. Id. at 511. The active clinical practice requirement was addressed by the Virginia Supreme Court in Hinkley v. Koehler, supra. The Supreme Court explained that whether a proffered witness meets this requirement is “determined by reference to the relevant medical procedure”; specifically, the court must “examin[e] the context of the actions by which the defendants [are] alleged to have deviated from the standard of care.” Hinkley, 606 S.E.2d at 806-807. In Hinkley, the alleged negligence formi o establish these essential elements, the medical defendants are entitled to summary judgment with respect to the plaintiffs claims for malpractice and wrongful death. 2. The Sh 4 (E.D.Va.1991) (<HOLDING>). While the doctrine of sovereign immunity does
holding that even if the plaintiff had asserted a cause of action under the virginia wrongful death act against the city police officers the police officers would be entitled to sovereign immunity holding that sovereign immunity barred a wrongful death claim against the board and stating that the only question is whether the boards sovereign immunity protection was waived emphasis added recognizing cause of action for wrongful death holding that the police officers had probable cause to make a warrantless entry holding that a city police officers negligent actions involved in the pursuit of a speeding automobile were entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity