games satisfying the lottery definition does not end there. Under this Court’s precedent, see Narragansett Indian Tribe of Rhode Island v. State, 667 A.2d 280 (R.I.1995), the definition of “lottery” encompasses all the games sanctioned under § 41-9.1-3(17) of the Casino Act. Unquestionably, the Casino Act refers to games in which one can exercise some level of skill to increase his or her likelihood of winning. At the poker table for example, an experienced gambler may “know when to hold ‘em, know when to fold ’em, know when to walk away, and know when to run.” A seasoned blackjack player may know the appropriate situation to hit or stand based on the cards dealt around the table. But even in these games, the outcome depends heavily oh the luck of the draw. See Marder, 48 F.3d at 569 (<HOLDING>); People v. Turner, 165 Misc.2d 222, 629
recognizing that although skill may play a part in video poker games it did not dominate holding that it is not recognizing that an indictment may be dismissed in part holding that a challenge to part b determinations in an order involving both part a and part b must begin in district court holding that it may not