United States v. Wetmore, 766 F.Supp.2d 319, 321-22 (D.Mass.2011); United States v. Blake, 2010 WL 702958, 2, 6, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23014, 4-5, 16 (E.D.Cal. February 24) (not designated for publication) (characterizing allegations that provided probable cause for a search warrant as "grooming”); United States v. Hansel, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 54725, 2 (N.D.Iowa August 4) (not designated for publication); United States v. Gleich, 2005 WL 741921, 1-2, 3-4, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5149, 4-6, 9-10 (D.N.D. March 30) (not designated for publication). 59 . State v. Sorabella, 277 Conn. 155, 213-14, 891 A.2d 897, 932-33 (2006) (rejecting complaints about Kenneth Lanning’s testimony); Haycraft v. State, 760 N.E.2d 203, 210-11 (Ind.App. 1st Dist.2001), transfer denied, 774 N.E.2d 514 (Ind.2002) (<HOLDING>); People v. Petri, 279 Mich.App. 407, 415-16,
recognizing that a common illustration of an admissible opinion under rule 701 is an expression of opinion by a lay observer of a cars speed holding that witness grand jury testimony was admissible when defendant waived his constitutional right of confrontation by making witness unavailable by threats to his life holding that testimony regarding witness credibility is prohibited unless it is admissible as character evidence holding the testimony admissible as that of a skilled witness under indianas r 701 holding that promises made by the prosecution to a witness in exchange for that witness testimony relate directly to the credibility of the witness