As we think that the State’s objection was
holding that a defendants substance abuse or addiction does not justify a downward departure holding that distinguished service record including two purple hearts did not justify downward departure holding that despite the defendants status as the sole supporter of his wife and three children the district court erred when it gave a downward departure for familial obligations because departure downward in sentencing is not justified for family reasons except in unusual circumstances holding that military service although exemplary 25 years prior to offense did not justify downward departure holding that the district courts denial of a downward departure was an exercise of discretion and therefore not reviewable