or an agent or employee of the employer for the death of or a work-related injury sustained by the employee.” Tex. Lab. Code Ann. § 408.001(a) (West 2015). The entity with the "right to control” the employee at the time of an accident is the "employer” for workers’ compensation purposes. See Archem v. Austin Indus., Inc., 804 S,W.2d 268, 269 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, no writ). The concept of joint control shared by dual or co-employers has been found applicable in workers’ compensation insurance cases. See Port Elevator-Brownsville v. Casados, 358 S.W.3d 238, 242 (Tex.2012) (concluding employee of staffing company was covered by both temporary employer's and staffing company's workers’ compensation insurance); Wingfoot Enters. v. Alvarado, 111 S.W.3d 134, 143 (Tex.2003) (<HOLDING>); Brown v. Aztec Rig Equip., Inc., 921 S.W.2d
holding that exclusiveremedy provision applied to both temporary staffing company and client company holding owner of company qualified as an employer due to inter alia his authority to hire and fire employees and overall financial control of company holding that trial court erred in granting ex parte temporary injunction prohibiting marketing activities of defendant company because there had been no showing that plaintiff company would likely suffer irreparable harm or lacked an adequate remedy at law holding that plaintiffs failure to mention vice president of thirdparty company in initial disclosures was harmless because plaintiffs mentioned president of company and defendants conducted no discovery of company holding that a limited liability company is a citizen of any state of which a member of the company is a citizen