were suspended by the district court. In 2008, after about five years in prison, Defendant was released on probation. Within months of his release, however, the State began to allege what became a series of ensuing violations that culminated in the revocation of Defendant’s probation. Ultimately, the district court ordered Defendant to serve the balance of his sentence in prison, including a previously imposed one year habitual offender enhancement. Defendant appeals both the revocation of his probation, as well as the conditions of probation. We affirm. BACKGROUND In 2001 Defendant was indicted for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of Kathryn Dockweiller, an Albuquerque attorney, in 1988. Defendant was allowed to plead guilty, pursuant to North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970) (<HOLDING>), to second-degree murder, contrary to NMSA
holding that entering a guilty plea is an admission of guilt and a waiver of the right to jury trial holding that a voluntary and intelligent plea of guilty is an admission of all the elements of a formal criminal charge holding that for a trial judge to accept a defendants guilty plea without an affirmative showing that it was intelligent and voluntary violates the defendants constitutional rights holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea holding that a district court may accept a defendants guilty plea despite an absence of admission to criminal wrongdoing