affirmed the district court’s judgment in all other respects. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 76 F.3d 1155 (11th Cir.1996). That panel opinion was vacated and rehearing en banc was granted. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 83 F.3d 1346 (11th Cir.1996). III.Issues on Appeal We address two issues in this opinion: First, whether the City may be liable under Title VII for Terry’s and Silverman’s hostile environment sexual harassment of Faragher, regardless of its actual or constructive knowledge of that harassment; and second, whether the City knew or should have known le environment case, a supervisor’s harassing conduct is typically outside the scope of his employment. See Steele, 867 F.2d at 1311 (11th Cir.1989); accord Andrade v. Mayfair Management, Inc., 88 F.3d 258, 261 (4th Cir.1996)(<HOLDING>). We noted that: Strict liability is illogical
holding that the plaintiff must establish that a supervisors harassment was within the scope of his employment and that the employer failed to respond adequately and effectively when it learned of the harassment holding that restatement  2191 is inapplicable to alleged sexual harassment by a supervisor was sexual harassment within the scope of antonis employment of course not holding plaintiffs claim of sexual harassment was beyond the scope of the administrative charge where plaintiff had charged only discriminatory failure to promote holding that illegal sexual harassment is an illegitimate corporate activity beyond the scope of the supervisors employment holding that supervisors questions made two and three times a week about plaintiffs sexual activities constituted actionable sexual harassment