Montes was not the addressee, therefore, the service of process was defective. Under Rule 107, when a citation is served by registered or certified mail as authorized under Rule 106, the return by the officer or authorized person must contain the return receipt with the addressee’s signature. Tex.R. Civ. P. 107. In Pharmakinetics Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz, the court held that a domestic return receipt signed by Charlotte Young, while the name of the appointee designated to receive service for defendant was listed as Steve Woodman, was invalid. Pharmaki-netics Laboratories, Inc., 717 S.W.2d at 706. The discrepancy rendered service of process invalid since the record on its face showed that the return was not signed by the person appointed. Id.; see also Keeton, 53 S.W.3d at 19 (<HOLDING>); Bronze & Beautiful, Inc. v. Mahone, 750
holding service of process defective when the return receipt is not signed by the addressee holding that trial rule 415f will not cure defective service of process where no person authorized by the rules was actually served holding that a party loses its right to contest default final judgment on grounds of defective service of process by entering general appearance unless it also contests service of process or raises issue of personal jurisdiction holding that service of notice of lien statements on homeowners was sufficient even though endorsement stated return receipt requested instead of return receipt requested showing address where delivered where service was handled in same manner and where homeowners received and signed for address shown on return receipt moreover actual notice was sufficient under statute holding service of process defective when the receipt card was signed by someone who was not the registered agent