that Jones took the money for her own use and intended to deprive the government of it. The jurors may also have inferred that after hours Jones used her keys to destroy the receipts evidencing the cash collection. Upon execution of the search warrant, the investigator found at Jones’s home a twenty-eight-foot extension ladder, identical to the one purchased by Jones with the government credit card. Jones explained that she had used her own funds to purchase the ladder found in her home and that she had later purchased an identical ladder for the library because she was so pleased with the model. The jury was free to reject that explanation and infer from the evidence that Jones rented the large van to move the ladder home and use it to paint her house. See Strickland, 509 F.2d at 276 (<HOLDING>). Additionally, the jury may have doubted that
holding intent may be inferred from large amount of marijuana holding specific intent to harm may be inferred from the circumstances and that finding is a matter for the jury recognizing that defendants intent to return stolen items to their rightful owner is a valid defense to charge of receiving stolen property holding that criminal intent may be inferred from the defendants false explanation of the possession of stolen items holding intent may be inferred from all facts and circumstances