64 . Id. 65 . See Hendricks Decl. Ex. PP (Standard Release) ("I understand and acknowledge that the filmmakers may use my Contribution in connection with the creation of a nonfiction production, which may be released theatrically, non-theatrically, [or] on television.... I acknowledge that the Producer and/or Licensed Parties may edit or alter my Contribution to the Production as they wish.”). 66 . See von Billow, 811 F.2d at 145-46. 67 . Supra n. 65. 68 . See, e.g., Gonzales, 194 F.3d at 33 ("United States v. Cutler, 6 F.3d 67 (2d Cir.1993), ... did not involve confidential materials, as the attorney's pronouncements were made publicly in front of television cameras.”); see also Saperstein v. Palestinian Auth., No. 09-mc-00619 (SLTXALC), 2010 WL 1371384, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 6, 2010) (<HOLDING>). The cases upon which respondents rely are
holding that apprendi was not triggered because the defendants were sentenced to terms of imprisonment that were within the maximum penalties for the rico offenses that they were found guilty of committing holding that outtakes of a bbc documentary were nonconfidential holding that tort claims were arbitrable because they arose out of and were related to contract holding that the plaintiffs causes of action were preempted because their claims were premised on the existence of an erisa plan holding that the litigation privilege did not preclude a malicious prosecution claim where the accusatorial statements that led to the plaintiffs arrest were made before the charges against him were filed and were not made during and were unrelated to the judicial proceeding