inequitable. Additionally, the discharge of a portion of the debts constitutes “extraordinary circumstances” justifying Rule 60(b)(6) relief from the judgment.. Pollard, supra, at 228. Thus, the trial court did not err or abuse its discretion by not enforcing the default judgment. The wife next argues that the trial court erred in only requiring the husband to pay arrearage for the unpaid periodic alimony from February 1992 until February 1994. The trial court’s judgment expressly stated that the husband owed the wife “$9,100 ar-rearage in periodic alimony from February 1994 to March 30, 1996.” The evidence is undisputed that the husband has not paid alimony since January 1992. The testimony indicated that the wife lived with the husband’s parents from February 1992 until possib 1984) (<HOLDING>). An alimony obligation may also be waived by
holding social security disability payments and military disability payments are separate property after dissolution of marriage holding that wife was entitled to prejudgment interest on alimony and child support arrearages from the date those payments were due holding that alimony obligation was discharged by social security payments received by the wife holding parent has right to credit for social security retirement payments made for child holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation