of the debtor on the date of the filing of the petition, and that the debtor acquires or becomes entitled to acquire within 180 days after such date- — • (A) by bequest, devise, or inheritance. .. There is no dispute among the parties that the Debtor’s interest in the trust was acquired within 180 days after the filing of the petition. The issue the parties have brought before the Court is whether the Debtor acquired the property by way of “bequest, devise, or inheritance.” As noted above, in the absence of controlling federal law, “property” and “interests in property” are questions of state law. In re Doughman, 263 B.R. 905, 907 (Bankr.D.Kan.1999). As recognized by the parties, the Bankruptcy Code provides no definition of the terms “bequest,” “devise” or “inheritance,” thus re (<HOLDING>); In re Crandall, 173 B.R. 836
holding that distributions from an inter vivos trust do not qualify as bequests and  541a5a does not operate to bring such distributions into the bankruptcy estate holding appeal not moot when court could order debtor to return to the estate postconfirmation distributions of pension plan assets holding that defendants met the test for individual liability under  3713 and were personally liable for distributions made from decedents estate and trust holding that ijnter vivos trust distributions are not considered interest obtained by bequest devise or inheritance  holding that income distributions derived from an intervivos trust do not fit within the definition of  541a5a and therefore escape the pale of the 180 day dragnet