the edict that every administrative proclamation, fiat, or decree constitutes a rule mandating the rigors that appellant would apply to this case. Words such as “rule,” “impact,” “procedure,” et cetera, must contain within their syllables an alphabetical concatenation: the application of practicality and reasonableness, and the actual on-the-site effect upon the agency as well as upon the employer of whatever has been promulgated. Were East correct, any system within an agency that determines who should proceed against whom would be an APA matter of intrusion, domination, or substantive regulation. We would foresee aeons of rulemaking proceedings when all the agency seeks to do is operate in a rational manner. Cf. Donovan v. Union Packing Co. of Omaha, 714 F.2d 838, 840 (8th Cir. 1983) (<HOLDING>). It has been almost three years since OSHA
holding that implicit in the arbitrators power to subpoena relevant documents at hearing is the power to order prehearing discovery holding constriction of secretarys independent subpoena power to be inconsistent with enforcement of osh act holding that an attorneys failure to sign a subpoena can be cured holding that the subpoena power of a court cannot be more extensive than its jurisdiction recognizing the subpoena power of the judiciary