improper segmentation where initial shipments only preserved the future option of additional shipments). Accordingly, the Court determines that this segmentation argument fails as a matter of fact and law. Plaintiffs’ second improper segmentation argument, however, is persuasive. Plaintiffs argue that the Parallex Project involves a joint United States-Russian-Canadian experiment, in which plutonium will be shipped from Russia and the United States to Canada. While the EA considered' the American shipment of MOX to Canada, and the experiment itself, it failed to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Russian shipment. Plaintiffs argue that NEPA applies to the Russian shipment, and that the EA should have considered this part of the project. Defendants respond t C.Cir.1972) (<HOLDING>); Greenpeace USA v. Stone, 748 F.Supp. 749
holding that canadian citizens have standing to intervene in nepa based suit against agency on the basis of citizenss claims that possible oil spill from transalaskan oil pipeline might cause damage to canada holding a suit against an agency of the state is a suit against the state holding that a partys responsibility for damage from any cause included damage cause by the indemnitee holding state immune from suit brought by its own citizens holding that  exposure and manifestation occurred at the time of the damage causing oil spill