whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Parenti v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (1990), 66 Ohio App.3d 826, 829, 586 N.E.2d 1121. {¶ 14} The Johnsons asserted a number of claims in their complaint, including violations of the Ohio Securities Act, negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, invasion of privacy, respondeat superior, promissory estoppel, and fraudulent misrepresentation. In their brief, the Johnsons have addressed only their negligent-misrepresentation, fraudulent-misrepresentation, Ohio Securities Act, and respondeat superior claims. This court will limit its discussion to those claims. See State ex rel. Moore v. Malone, 96 Ohio St.3d 417, 2002-Ohio-4821, 775 N.E.2d 812, at ¶ 39 (<HOLDING>). Moreover, before this court can determine
holding that claims made but not argued in a brief are waived holding that a party waived the claims she failed to pursue in her merit brief holding the petitioner abandoned her cat claim when she failed to raise it in her initial appellate brief holding that a party may pursue an issue not raised in its initial brief where a substantial change in law occurs after the brief was filed holding that party waived argument by failing to brief it on appeal