case when Ferrell’s father pur chased the Buick and had it titled in Scarborough’s name. Thus, Scarborough’s failure to complete the assignment of title by entering the name of the transferee on the certificate of title does not, per se, defeat the transfer of her ownership of the Buick. Accordingly, we must look to the specific circumstances in this case to determine if, and to whom, Scarborough’s ownership of the Buick was transferred. In order to effect a transfer of the ownership of a motor vehicle, two things are required: (1) the owner must actually deliver the endorsed certificate of title to the transferee, and (2) the owner must deliver possession of the vehicle to the transferee. See Nationwide Insurance Company v. Storm, 200 Va. 526, 528-29, 106 S.E.2d 588, 589-90 (1959) (<HOLDING>). Although Scarborough testified that the Buick
holding that a purchaser of a vehicle was a buyer in the ordinary course of business even though the car dealer did not provide the certificate of title at the time of the sale holding that delivery of citation is proper when delivered to a party capable of receiving it holding that delivery of possession of vehicle without delivery of certificate of title did not transfer ownership even though full payment had been received holding that ownership of vehicle later involved in accident passed to buyer even though assignment of title not completed holding that normal presumption of ownership in favor of holder of motor vehicle certificate of title may be rebutted despite language of minnstat  168a10 subd 5 providing that the transfer of a motor vehicle is not effective until titling requirements are complied with