examined in the polymarker and DQ Alpha tests satisfied that requirement. Each derives from a gene located on a different part of the chromosome. Defendant never challenged the independence of the loci. At the pretrial hearing, Dr. Shaler used the same version of the product rule as the State to compute his statistical figures. Furthermore, he testified that those loci were “independently inherited.” See also FBI Report, supra, at 53 (“The distribution of the genotype frequencies for the various PM loci (as well as HLA-DQa) meet HWE [Hardy-Weinberg expectations], and there is little evidence for association of alleles across loci (for the PM loci, HLA-DQa, and D1S80) for our African American, Ca e product rule as scientifically reliable. See, e.g., Fishback, supra, 851 P.2d at 893-94 (<HOLDING>); Clark v. State, 679 So.2d 321, 321
holding that calculations done by applying product rule were generally accepted in relevant scientific community holding that product rule method of dna statistical evidence is now generally accepted in the relevant scientific community holding under the restrictive frye test that pcrstr testing is generally accepted in the relevant scientific community holding that expert opinion based on scientific technique is inadmissible unless technique is generally accepted as reliable in relevant scientific community holding that expert testimony may be admissible even if not generally accepted in the relevant scientific community provided that it qualifies in some other way as reliable under federal rule of evidence 702