a private landowner’s property and demand access, given that (1) they were told the person they were investigating was not present, (2) the reported criminal activity they were investigating had been completed and therefore required no immediate action, and (3) they did not have a search warrant to search for any parts of the deer that reportedly had been shot out of season. In light of these facts, construed in a light most favorable to Johnson, the Defendants did not possess probable cause to arrest him, and his right to be free from such an arrest was clearly established. b. excessive force An excessive force claim triggers the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee of the right to be secure in one’s person. See Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 394-95, 109 S.Ct. 1865, 104 L.Ed.2d 443 (1989) (<HOLDING>). “[S]ome degree of physical coercion or threat
holding that claims that law enforcement officials used excessive force in making an arrest are properly analyzed under the fourth amendments objective reasonableness standard holding that excessive force by a school official should be analyzed under the fourth amendment holding that all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force  deadly or not  in the course of an arrest investigatory stop or other seizure of a free citizen should be analyzed under the fourth amendment and its reasonableness standard holding that all claims that law enforcement officers have used excessive force deadly or not  in the course of an arrest investigatory stop or other seizure of a free citizen should be analyzed under the fourth amendment and its reasonableness standard holding that whether an officers force was reasonable must be analyzed under the reasonableness standard of the fourth amendment