On February 18, 1993, the Review Board filed a motion to dismiss because of deficiencies in the record and brief filed by Claimant. In that motion, the Review Board pointed out that Claimant's failure to file an assignment of errors necessitated dismissal for lack of jurisdiction. On March 16, 1993, Claimant filed a request for an extension of time to supplement her brief and the record. On June 29, 1993, this court denied the Review Board's motion to dismiss and granted Claimant's motion for extension. Claimant subsequently filed an assignment of errors. Our June 29, 1993, ruling was in error. An erroneous ruling is not binding upon this court when it is corrected in the process of considering a current appeal. See CNA Insurance Co. v. Vellucci (1992), Ind.App., 596 N.E.2d 926, 927 (<HOLDING>). 3 . In Lugar, the appellant's attorney did
recognizing that a reviewing court should not reconsider credibility determinations made by the alj as long as they find some support in the record holding that the effect of a remand is to return this proceeding to the lower court as though the erroneous ruling never had been made holding that a resentencing court may reconsider a defendants criminal history category as long as the appellate court did not expressly or implicitly limit  the remand to only a portion of the sentence holding that this court may reconsider an erroneous ruling as long as the appeal is current holding trial court has jurisdiction to reconsider new trial order as long as case is pending