father’s failure to file a petition for review of the adjudicatory and dispositional orders in the district court precludes appellate review. The filing of a petition for review in the district court is required for appellate review of a magistrate’s order. See C.S. v. People, 83 P.3d 627 (Colo.2004). Here, while the magistrate entered a written adjudicatory order as to mother, the record on appeal does not include such an order as to father. It thus appears that the magistrate’s adjudicatory and dispositional orders as to father were not reduced to writing as required by § 19—1—108(4)(e), C.R.S.2005. Therefore, there was no final adjudicatory or dispositional order from which father could seek review in the district court. See People in Interest of M.C.L., 671 P.2d 1339 (Colo.App.1983)(<HOLDING>). The record, however, contains documentation,
holding that the time limit for filing a petition for review of a final order of deportation is jurisdictional holding that when a courts statements from the bench conflict with its written order the order controls holding that the time in which to file a petition for review of a commissioners order commences upon the signing of the written order holding that we do not have jurisdiction to consider the underlying final order upon petition for review of a motion to reopen where the petitioner did not earlier seek review of that underlying final order holding that if defendant could establish ineffective assistance of counsel in failure to file petition for review in his direct appeal then appropriate remedy would be to allow filing of petition for review out of time