See, e.g., In re Banco Nacional, 91 B.R. 661, 664 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1988) (recognizing that the injunctive relief under section 304 "is not unlike the injunction which is automatic in a chapter 7 or 11 case pursuant to section 362 of the Code”). Later in the opinion, however, we will discuss the more appropriate analysis under section 304 of the Code. 10 . S.I. Acquisition, 817 F.2d at 1143-45. 11 . 714 F.2d 1266 (5th Cir.1983). The corporate trust fund and the denuding the corporation doctrines impose personal liability on those who use their power of control for their personal benefit rather than that of the corporation. Id. at 1272. 12 . S.I. Acquisition, 817 F.2d at 1150. 13 . Id. at 1153 (emphasis added). 14 . Id. at 1152; see also In re MortgageAmerica Corp., 714 F.2d at 1270-72 (<HOLDING>). 15 . S.I. Acquisition, 817 F.2d at 1152. 16 .
holding that individuals assumption of the role of president of the corporation and her authority to sign documents on behalf of the corporation demonstrate that she had the requisite control over the corporation for purposes of finding individual liability under section 5a holding that the trust fund and denuding theories of recovery were considered to belong to the debtor corporation because each action was created for the benefit of the corporation ie to vindicate injury to the corporation caused by improper actions by control persons holding texas law permits a corporate debtor to bring a trust fund denuding action holding that corporation and sole owner of corporation were separate legal entities and corporation was not party to contract signed by owner in individual capacity holding that claims of corporation vest in corporation