a likelihood of substantial and immediate irreparable injury and the inadequacy of remedies at law. “[P]rinciples of equity, comity, and federalism ... should inform the judgment of fe isconduct supported by a fully defined record can support broad in-junctive relief.” Thomas, 978 F.2d at 509. While we are dealing with a relatively small number of citations of only fourteen individual plaintiffs in this case, the citations have been the result of a clear CHP- citation policy in violation of the Fourth Amendment, which has continued despite the Bianco court’s limiting interpretation of the helmet law. CHP argues that none of the motorcyclists is threatened with irreparable injury because the Fourth Amendment lack-of-probable-cause defense would be available at their 74 (3d Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, this circuit has upheld injunctions
holding that injunctive relief may be warranted where there is a particularly strong likelihood of success on the merits even if there is a relatively slight showing of irreparable injury holding that potential loss of a contract constitutes irreparable injury holding that evidence of specific competitive injury establishes irreparable injury warranting injunctive relief holding that even when likelihood of success has been established the absence of irreparable injury standing alone makes preliminary injunctive relief improper holding that an osha inspection violating the fourth amendment would constitute irreparable injury for which injunctive relief would be appropriate