to the charged offenses. Because Defendant did not object to this evidence at trial, however, he bears the burden of showing that its admission constituted plain error - meaning that the error was such that it “had a probable impact on the jury’s finding that the defendant was guilty.” State v. Lawrence, 365 N.C. 506, 518, 723 S.E.2d 326, 334 (2012) (citations and quotation marks omitted). We conclude that in light of the overwhelming evidence of Defendant’s guilt — specifically, the voluminous testimony concerning the images found on his computers and the explicit file names of those images, which typically described the age of the subjects and the sexual nature of the content — Defendant cannot establish plain error. See State v. Standi, 355 N.C. 266, 267, 559 S.E.2d 788, 789 (2002) (<HOLDING>). Conclusion For the reasons stated above, we
holding that inadmissible testimony did not rise to level of plain error because the overwhelming evidence against defendant leads us to conclude that the error committed did not cause the jury to reach a different verdict than it otherwise would have reached holding there was not plain error because a different result probably would not have been reached absent the trial courts alleged error holding that it was not plain error for the court not to give a self defense jury instruction where the defendant did not request one holding that the district court committed plain error by admitting evidence obtained in violation of the fourth amendment where the error did affect a substantial right of the defendants and the admission of evidence which should have been excluded did have a prejudicial impact on the jury holding any improper delegation did not rise to level of plain error