to possess a controlled substance. Jacobs’ advice to petitioner was a constitutionally deficient performance. ’ (4) To establish prejudice, petitioner must “show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052; see also Mask v. McGinnis, 233 F.3d 132, 140 (2d Cir.2000) (petitioner need only show that but for counsel’s errors there was a reasonable probability that the result of the plea bargaining process would have been different). Once such a showing is made, the claim is not defeated by a showing that counsel provided competent representation in a more general sense. See Henry v. Poole, 409 F.3d 48, 2005 WL 1220468 (2d Cir. May 24, 2005) (<HOLDING>). As applied here, the question is whether
holding that ineffective assistance of counsel occurs when there is deficient performance and prejudice which is a reasonable probability that but for counsels unprofessional errors the result of the proceeding would have been different holding that to establish prejudice there must be a reasonable probability that but for counsels unprofessional errors the result of the proceeding would have been different holding that a state court unreasonably applied strickland when it avoided addressing the probable impact of counsels unprofessional errors based on of a finding that counsel provided meaningful representation overall holding that to establish prejudice sufficient to warrant finding of ineffective assistance the defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsels unprofessional errors the result of the proceeding would have been different holding that in order to show prejudice defendant must demonstrate that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsels unprofessional errors the result of the proceeding would have been different