nerve cells. This induced an immune cascade resulting in inflammation, demyelination, and nerve damage characteristic of multiple sclerosis. The government’s expert, Dr. Venkate-san, agreed that molecular mimicry is accepted as playing a role in the autoimmune disease Sydenham’s chorea. Id. Medical science generally accepts that Sydenham’s chorea develops as a result of immune response cross-reactivity following infection with streptococcus bacteria. Id. The special master found that “[m]olecular mimicry is a well-regarded theory in some contexts,” Special Masters Decision, 2011 WL 4537877, at *11, but correctly required additional evidence showing that molecular mimicry can cause the influenza vaccine to significantly aggravate multiple sclerosis, see Broekelschen, 618 F.3d at 1345 (<HOLDING>). In support of his theory that molecular
holding that the medical review panel is authorized to review the medical records and other submitted material pertaining to each defendants treatment of a patient and that while a medical malpractice plaintiff must as a prerequisite to filing suit present the  proposed complaint for review and expert opinion by a medical review panel there is no requirement for such plaintiff to fully explicate and provide the particulars or legal contentions regarding the claim holding a petitioner must provide a reputable medical or scientific explanation that pertains specifically to the petitioners case holding that scientific hydrographic judgment and purely scientific considerations do not involve policy considerations and are not protected by the discretionary function exception holding that scientific evidence must satisfy the pertinent delaware rules of evidence concerning admission of scientific testimony or evidence ie dre 401 402 403 702 and 703 and be relevant and reliable holding that a state is required to provide medical care to incarcerated individuals