which creates the requirement that the. government provide a “full and exact equivalent” in the form of interest. See Olson v. United States, 292 U.S. 246, 254-55 (1934). If the compensation clause of Article III of the Constitution requires payment of interest, it is because that particular clause contains an affirmative requirement for undiminished and timely paid compensation. The Export Clause merely contains a prohibition against government action. The remedy for the prohibition may take various forms; it is not an absolute and affirmative requirement to restore Plaintiffs to their prior position. It is this affirmative requirement that fully waives sovereign immunity under the Just Compensation Clause of the Fifth Amendment and perhaps under Article III. Because t 86) (<HOLDING>); Atlas Corp. v. United States, 895 F.2d 745,
holding that taxes are not takings unless the government tries to achieve through special taxes what the takings clause of the fifth amendment forbids if done directly holding that rights in a government benefits program were not vested property for purposes of the takings clause of the fifth amendment holding that temporary deprivations of use are compensable under the takings clause holding that no takings claim can arise unless a permit is denied holding the takings clause inapplicable to the states of its own force