CURIAM. Melvin Antonio Burl, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) as untimely. We previously remanded this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining when Burl delivered the motion to prison officials for mailing. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988) (<HOLDING>). On remand, the district court found that Burl
holding that prisoners legal materials are deemed filed on the date they are deposited with prison officials for mailing holding that an noa filed by a pro se prisoner is deemed filed on the date that the prisoner delivers it to prison authorities for mailing holding that prisoners notice of appeal deemed filed on date he delivered it to prison officials for mailing to court holding that pro se prisoners 28 usc  2254 application deemed filed for limitation purposes when deposited with prison officials for mailing holding that prisoners notice of appeal is deemed filed on date he delivered it to prison officials for mailing to court