Bing v. City of Whitehall, 456 F.3d 555, 565 (6th Cir.2006) (“Exigent circumstances terminate when the factors creating the exigency are negated.”). Moreover, the exigent circumstances that precipitated the initial seizure did not materially change from the beginning of the standoff to the end. This armed standoff was a single Fourth Amendment event, a continuous process of formalizing Fisher’s arrest that began in the early morning hours of October 24. The police maintained a secure perimeter around Fisher’s apartment, and Fisher refused to surrender. Fisher threatened the officers shortly after they arrived, and retained full control of his eighteen guns and ammunition until the end. The entire standoff was an uninterrupted, fluid engagement between Fisher and the police. See id. (<HOLDING>). The mere fact that Fisher was not seen with a
holding that the passage of time was a relevant factor when determining custody issues holding the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances holding that in an armed standoff the exigency did not terminate due to the passage of time because bing was at all times dangerous citing tyler 436 us at 510 98 sct 1942 holding that a defendant need not be advised of the right to terminate questioning at any time holding that a road not open to the public at all times was not a highway