and the vehicle owner does not admit responsibility or pay the fine). Equally important, a six-year statute of limitations governs the filing of citations for civil infractions such as parking violations. Mich. Comp. Laws § 257.741(1) (providing that a “civil infraction action” is a “civil action”); id. § 600.5813 (establishing a six-year statute of limitations for personal ac tanding created by the threatened consequences of failing to respond relates solely to the penalties for taking no action. This distinction rebuts Herrada’s effort to draw support from Social Security Act cases where statements in the agency’s denial notices raised uncertainty about the effect of failing to request a hearing to challenge the determination. See Day v. Shalala, 23 F.3d 1052, 1065-66 (6th Cir. 1994) (<HOLDING>); Gonzalez v. Sullivan, 914 F.2d 1197, 1203
holding that the granting of an application to file an appeal out of time is considered part of the direct appeal process under oklahoma law holding the court lacked jurisdiction where the defendant failed to file a notice of appeal on the attorneys fee issue because a supplemental notice of appeal is required for us to have jurisdiction over an attorneys fees issue that becomes final subsequent to the initial notice of appeal holding that due process rights were not violated when alien claimed a lack of actual notice but his attorney received notice holding that a notice that misled claimants by equating a new application with an appeal of the initial determination violated due process recognizing that service of process irrelevant in the initial determination of diversity