an action with prejudice based upon the parties’ stipulation, unlike a judgment imposed at the end of an adversarial proceeding, receives its legitimizing force from the fact that the parties consented to it.” Id. 2 . In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all decisions of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the close of business on September 30, 1981. 3 . The court notes that the plaintiff participated in the arbitration proceeding through its conclusion, while represented by counsel, without ever challenging the manner in which the arbitrator was selected and thus waived his right to do so in subsequent proceedings. See, e.g., Brook v. Peak Int’l, Ltd., 294 F.3d 668, 673-74 (2002) (<HOLDING>); Own Capital, L.L.C. v. Johnny's Enters.,
holding that the failure to object to an instruction constitutes a waiver of error holding that the failure to object to a defect in the arbitrator selection process constituted a waiver holding that even though statute did not provide for attorneys fees against county its failure to object constituted waiver holding that where defendant failed to object to facts in psi relating to prior conviction the failure to object constituted an admission holding that the failure to object to a trial courts instruction constitutes waiver