831, 838 (Alaska 2015) (quoting Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric Inst., 208 P.3d 168, 187 (Alaska 2009)). 15 . Cowan, 255 P.3d at 974. 16 . Penn v. Ivey, 615 P.2d 1, 4 n.4 (Alaska 1980) (quoting Albert v. Declue, 526 S.W.2d 39, 40 (Mo.App.1975)) (first citing Knapp v. Wise, 122 Ariz. 327, 594 P.2d 1023 (App.1979); then citing Gospel Echos Chapel Inc. v. Wadsworth, 19 Ariz.App. 382, 507 P.2d 994 (1973); then citing Cole v. Burleson, 375 So.2d 1046 (Miss.1979); and then citing Swecker v. Dorn, 181 Mont. 436, 593 P.2d 1055 (1979)). 17 . Peters v. Juneau-Douglas Girl Scout Council, 519 P.2d 826, 830 (Alaska 1974). 18 . See Penn, 615 P.2d at 4. 19 . Vezey v. Green, 35 P.3d 14, 22 (Alaska 2001) (quoting Nome 2000 v. Fagerstrom, 799 P.2d 304, 309 (Alaska 1990)) (citing Peters, 519 P.2d at 831) (<HOLDING>); see also Nome 2000, .799 P.2d at 310 (holding
holding that use of traffic signal equipment was inconsistent with sellers ownership and constituted acceptance recognizing that a temporary use of property does not automatically create an expectation of privacy in that property holding evidence which established that use of property was permissive showed use of property was not adverse holding that allowing moderate use of the resources on the property was not inconsistent with exclusive use holding that the amendment was a use regulation which was in effect a condition on the use of property in the affected zone