after the criminal investigation was completed was a denial. Id. at 457. The court of appeals stated, "The words 'will not be made available to you at this time' and 'you cannot review' are not words associated with [an] acceptance of WTMJ's demand for records." Id. The court of appeals further stated, "We do not believe that the DOC's qualification that some of the records would be released when an investigation was completed [was] sufficient to change the December 1 letter from a denial to an agreement to produce. The letter did not indicate when the investigation would terminate." Id. The court of appeals held that there were two statutory choices, which were "comply or deny." Id. (citing State ex rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrange, 200 Wis. 2d 585, 597, 547 N.W.2d 587 (1996) (<HOLDING>)). ¶ 55. We are satisfied that, under the
holding that time limits in wis stat  980071 are mandatory holding inter alia that wis stat  980071 allows a ch 980 committee to retain an independent examiner holding that documents generated by the cia at the specific request of congress were exempt from disclosure as congressional records holding that personnel records or conduct investigative records regarding police officers are exempt from disclosure under virginias freedom of information act which exempts personnel records from disclosure holding that a requesting party may immediately bring an enforcement action if an open records law request is denied and that such actions are exempt from the notice provisions of wis stat  893801