commensurate with his ability to accrue debt,” and the potential that the former husband’s lack of financial responsibility would encumber the title of the marital home. The trial court ordered the former husband to pay $681.38 in monthly child support; ordered the former husband to pay retroactive child support dating back to the date the petition for dissolution of marriage was filed; and set the child support arrearages at $10,902.08. Although the former husband claimed that he should receive credit for the money he deposited in the former wife’s checking acc CA 2007) (explaining that 61.075 requires that the trial court set apart each party’s nonmari- tal assets prior to equitably distributing the parties’ marital assets); Dyer v. Dyer; 658 So.2d 148, 149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995) (<HOLDING>). Once the nonmarital assets are set aside to
holding that the trial court erred in finding that marital property was the former wifes separate property based on a nonseparation agreement in which the former husband purported to relinquish any interest in the marital property holding that the fact that the former wife lost on an issue which is not spurious does not mean that she could not be a candidate to receive attorneys fees from the former husband holding that the former husbands property from a noninterspousal gift may not be distributed under section 610751 although use of the former husbands separate property may be awarded to the former wife to satisfy the former husbands child support obligation holding former wifes cause of action accrued at the time of former husbands failure to pay her the portion of his retirement benefits to which she was entitled which was no earlier than the date of his actual retirement holding that the former wife did not waive her attorneyclient privilege simply because the credibility of her claim that she relied on her husbands representations could be impeached by deposing her former attorney