to include polygraph and computerized voice-stress examinations. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and procedural history, which we reference only as necessary to explain our decision to affirm. In general, a district court may impose a special condition of supervised release so long as the condition (1) is “reasonably related” to the nature of the offense and to the goals of deterrence, rehabilitation, and public safety described in 18 U.S.C. § 3558(a); (2) “involves no greater deprivation of liberty than is reasonably necessary” to achieve these purposes of sentencing; and (3) “is consistent with any pertinent policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission.” 18 U.S.C. § 3583(d)(l)-(3); see also United States v. MacMillen, 544 F.3d 71, 74-75 (2d Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). Ayers does not dispute that the ordered
recognizing district courts wide latitude in imposing supervised release conditions recognizing that probation officers are mandated to enforce a sentencing courts terms and conditions of supervised release recognizing defense counsel must have wide latitude in making tactical decisions recognizing the wide latitude district courts enjoy in interpreting and administering their own rules holding that further supervised release may be ordered as a sentence for violation of supervised release