say that the trial court abused its discretion in making the attorney’s fees and costs awards it did. First, in the modification order, not subject to this appeal but made part of our record, the parties are ordered to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. Second, Albert’s counsel was awarded only a fraction of the attorney’s fees and costs for which he provided competent evidentiary support. See Arthur Andersen & Co. v. Perry Equip. Corp, 945 S.W.2d 812, 818 (Tex.1997) (setting forth non-exclusive list of factors courts should consider when determining reasonableness of attorney’s fees); AM, 2005 WL 3005636, at *4. Finally, Patrice’s counsel provided no evidence that his fees and costs were reasonable. See Arthur Andersen & Co., 945 S.W.2d at 818; cf. A.L.S., 338 S.W.3d at 69-70 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we overrule Patrice’s fourth and
holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees holding trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to award attorneys fees after finding respondent failed to make child support payments because movant presented no evidence of any reasonable fees incurred holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding that it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to deny an award of attorneys fees to the wife