Worth Sept. 24, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication). When termination of parental rights is based on section D, the endangerment analysis focuses on the evidence of the child’s physical environment, although the environment produced by the conduct of the parents bears on the determination of whether the child’s surroundings threaten his well-being. In re S.M.L., 171 S.W.3d 472, 477 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Section D permits termination if the petitioner proves parental conduct caused a child to be placed or remain in an endangering environment. In re R.D., 955 S.W.2d 364, 367 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, pet. denied). It is not necessary that the parent’s conduct be ervs., 969 S.W.2d 77, 82-83 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1998, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Third, Jordan knew Akin was not interested in
holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother placed children with physically abusive father holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother placed children with father who lived transient lifestyle with children holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother endangered childs physical and emotional wellbeing by leaving child alone overnight with known cocaine abusers holding evidence legally sufficient under sections d and e holding evidence legally and factually sufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section e for endangering physical wellbeing of child based in part on evidence that mother remained with physically abusive person while she was pregnant