the finding as to whether counsel was adequately prepared does not revolve solely around the amount of time counsel spends on the case or the number of days which he or she spends preparing for mitigation. Instead, this must be a case-by-case analysis. For example, in Rose, although counsel had seventy-nine days in which to prepare for a re-sentencing, this was not sufficient time, in part because counsel never had a capital case before. Rose, 675 So.2d at 573. 10 . See, e.g., Mitchell v. State, 595 So.2d 938, 942 (Fla.1992) (finding that counsel was deficient and defendant suffered prejudice when counsel failed to present mitigating evidence that defendant had brain damage, a history of child abuse, and a history of substance abuse); State v. Lara, 581 So.2d 1288, 1289 (Fla.1991) (<HOLDING>); see also Harris v. Dugger, 874 F.2d 756, 763
holding that there was ineffective assistance because counsel did not take even the first step of requesting a mental examination when the defendants rape and robbery of a sixtysevenyearold woman for no reason was of such a bizarre nature as to call into question the petitioners mental condition holding that attorneys mental illness may justify equitable tolling holding that a mental illness limitation limiting the maximum payment for care of mental illness or care of nervous conditions of any type or cause is ambiguous because the plan contains no definition or explanation of the term mental illness  and thus construed against the insurance company does not include physically based illnesses holding that counsel did not sufficiently prepare for the penalty phase and defendant suffered prejudice because counsel failed to adequately present evidence of child abuse the defendants bizarre behavior signaling serious mental disorientation and pri or hospitalization for mental illness holding that defendant failed to show that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to adequately investigate the case because record demonstrated that counsel did in fact prepare for trial and interview witnesses