of th ty waiver to apply, a condition or use of tangible personal or real property must be involved. Tex. Civ. PRac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.021(2). Within section 101.021(2), “use” means “to put or [to] bring into action or service; to employ for or [to] apply to a given purpose.” Miller, 51 S.W.3d at 588. Claims involving the failure to use, or the non-use of property, do not fall within the TTCA’s property waiver. Id. at 587; White, 46 S.W.3d at 869-70; Kerrville State Hosp. v. Clark, 923 S.W.2d 582, 584 (Tex.1996). Additionally, the personal injury or death must be “caused by” the condition or use of the property. Tex. Civ. PRac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 101.021(2). Accordingly, the plaintiff must allege, among other things, Campus, 115 S.W.3d 154, 160 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Austin Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Gutierrez, 54
holding that claim for failure to monitor patient did not fall under ttcas property waiver recognizing that failure to develop claim on appeal constitutes waiver holding that a failure to file an appeal is within the scope of the waiver because the failure does not undermine the validity of the plea or waiver holding that failure to furnish proper training instruction training manuals and documents to officer who injured plaintiff failure to provide adequate tests for that officer and failure to discipline that officer fell outside ttcas property waiver holding that failure to administer an injectable drug is a nonuse of tangible property and does not fall under the waiver provisions of the texas tort claims act