and because he started having problems with his eyes. [AR 413-414]. The DOT classifies the jobs of “laborer, landscape” and “assembler, electrical accessories I” as requiring a “Specific Vocational Preparation” (“SVP”) of “Level 2,” defined as “[a]nything beyond short demonstration up to and including 1 month.” Those jobs also require “Level 2” reasoning development, which is defined as the abilit nt’s ability to log mileage, hours worked, and the places he drove in his job as a truck driver were not inconsistent with a valid IQ of 68); see generally Fanning, 827 F.2d at 634 (recognizing that if plaintiff otherwise meets section 12.05C, he “must be found disabled” without consideration of his work history as a laundry loader, janitor, and dishwasher); cf. Williams, 970 F.2d at 1185 (<HOLDING>). Defendant also argues that plaintiffs
holding that circumstantial evidence existed supporting manifestation of the claimants mental retardation before age 22 including the claimants lowgrade dropout and participation in prior special education classes holding that where the claimant had worked for 22 years in a steel drum factory and as a security guard for about a year the claimants ability to maintain a job for most of his adult life called his mental retardation into doubt holding that the alj erred in finding that the claimants mental retardation did not manifest itself before age 22 where the claimant attended special education classes dropped out of school in ninth grade had trouble with reading writing and math and had frequent fights with other children recognizing that texas courts have adopted the aamr definition of mental retardation providing that mental retardation must manifest before age of 18 years holding that the alj properly discounted a claimants testimony about the extent of his pain and limitations based on his ability to travel