police cars nearly simultaneously arrived at Ms. Witherspoon’s residence at 4 o’clock in the morning. Four uniformed police officers immediately got out of their patrol cars and approached Lowe and Witherspoon, commanding them to show their hands. Although the District Court did not make explicit findings about the speed with which the officers approached Lowe, the record indicates that they arrived in a hurried manner and at least one drew his firearm at some point during the encounter. A reasonable person in Lowe’s position would not have felt free to decline this interaction, turn, and leave. Indeed, the Government candidly conceded that the officers made a show of authority from the moment they first approached Lowe. See United States v. Waterman, 569 F.3d 144, 144-46 (3d Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); cf. United States v. Smith, 575 F.3d 308, 314
holding that a show of authority occurred when two uniformed police officers approached a house and commanded that people on the porch show their hands holding that defendant staying in abandoned house had no legitimate expectation of privacy in the house despite having a key to the house and the ability to let people in and out of it holding that there was no show of authority when two officers repeatedly asked an individual where is your girls house but where the two officers were still in their car neither officer displayed his weapon there was no physical touching and no indication as to the language or tone of the officers voice that might have signaled a clear show of authority holding that the defendant was not seized when two officers approached the defendant on a public street and asked him questions holding officers legally entitled to be on front porch of defendants house for purpose of conducting general inquiry or interview