those premises. This is not the act of an adult capable of free will and/or normal judgment. 8. Based on the above highly abnormal and continuously abusive state of affairs, Ms. Each was bereft of her cognitive faculties and associated capacity for normal adult judgment such that she was unable to fully appreciate the nature of Mr. Hose’s abuse oi/control over her and to take steps to actively interdict that control and associated abuse. (App. 223-24.) We do not necessarily reject the possibility that Each’s psychological development was retarded or even arrested during her time with Hose. We cannot, however, agree with Each’s contention that, “as a matter of law, [she] was incompetent from the outset as she was a minor at the time of her initial captivity and 977, 980 (8th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>); Zeidler v. United States, 601 F.2d 527,
holding that the statute of limitations accrued when the minors father was appointed his guardian and not when the minor became comatose holding that a child was not barred by a former statute of limitations applicable to actions to establish the existence of a father and child relationship when the current action was to establish the nonexistence of a father and child relationship and the presumed father no longer persisted in maintaining paternity holding that a claim accrued when a comatose patient died not when she fell into a yearslong coma because the plaintiff was never aware of her injury or its cause holding that the plaintiff was required to arbitrate his claim which accrued before he became bound by the arbitration rules of the new york stock exchange because he was fully aware of the existing claim at the time he became a member of the exchange and became bound by its arbitration rules holding that the payments accrued