decisions.” 73A C.J.S., Public Administrative Law and Procedure § 342 (2004). For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that our rules do authorize those who are parties to administrative rule-making proceedings to participate as parties to an appeal under the circumstances set forth in this case. {32} Respondents argue, without authority, that the term “parties” in Rule 12-601(B) applies only to an agency’s adjudicatory proceedings, not to rule making. We disagree. Rule 12-601(B) is not specific to adjudications; it includes “decisions” and “actions” of administrative agencies, each of which adequately describe administrative rule making. See Wylie Bros. Contracting Co. v. Albuquerque-Bernalillo Cnty. Air Quality Control Bd., 80 N.M. 633, 639, 459 P.2d 159, 165 (Ct. App. 1969) (<HOLDING>). This Court has never crafted a separate rule
recognizing that the declaratory judgment act is only procedural and does not create substantive rights internal quotation marks and citations omitted holding that such reports fell within the core class of testimonial statements described in this courts leading confrontation clause decisions internal quotation marks and citation omitted holding that the decisions of administrative agencies of the state described by article vi section 29 of the constitution of new mexico include regulations adopted by a board emphasis added internal quotation marks and citations omitted holding that competency is appropriately defined as the mental capacity to understand the nature of the death penalty and why it was imposed upon the convict emphasis added internal quotation marks omitted holding that our standard of review for decisions of the health care authority board  predecessor to the division  is very narrow and that we will not disturb the boards statutory interpretations absent a compelling indication of error internal quotation marks and citations omitted