did not err in failing to consider the applicability of listing 12.05(C). 2. Claimant also alleges the ALJ failed in his duty to develop the administrative record in regard to her cognitive and other psychological disorders. “In a social security disability case, the claimant bears the burden to prove her disability.” Flaherty, 515 F.3d at 1071. To be sure, administrative disability hearings are “nonadversarial ... and the ALJ has a duty to ensure that an adequate record is developed during the disability hearing consistent with the issues raised.” Id. Further, this duty “pertains even if the claimant is represented by counsel.” Id. But an ALJ’s duty to develop the record is not unqualified. See, e.g., Henrie v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 13 F.3d 359, 360-61 (10th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). a. Several preconditions
holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal holding that where issues are not properly raised and developed in briefs a court will not consider the merits thereof holding exception to the waiver rule exists when the issue presented is purely one of law and either does not depend on the factual record developed below or the pertinent record has been fully developed recognizing that an alj has a duty to ensure that an adequate record is developed during the disability hearing consistent with the issues raised  holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal