on July 1, 2003. Not only would the applicable six-year statute of limitations apply to bar any action relating to the collection of at least the first four installment payments, this Court recognizes that the Proposed Debtor’s failure to make the installment payments may constitute an unequivocal repudiation of the Proposed Debtor’s obligations under the Promissory Note. If the doctrine of unequivocal repudiation is applicable, the statute of limitations may have begun to run earlier than December 22, 2005. Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 735 F.2d 645, 648 (2d Cir.1984) (recognizing that an unequivocal repudiation would cause statute of limitations to run from date of repudiation); Quiroga v. Fall River Music, Inc., Civ. No. 93-3914, 1999 WL 102754 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 1999) (<HOLDING>); Hutton v. Smith, 175 N.Y. 375, 67 N.E. 633
holding sixyear statute of limitations applies to adea actions involving federal employees holding that the sixyear statute of limitations on a written contract is applicable to a cause of action based on a um policy holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional holding that sixyear statute of limitations ran from moment of unequivocal repudiation recognizing a sixyear statute of limitations on claims filed under the coal act