Trpko Taseski, Bosko Taseski, and TRBO Corporation; It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the franchise agreement between the parties dated July 5, 1993 is terminated; It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendants/counter-plaintiffs Trpko Taseski, Bosko Taseski, and TRBO Corporation shall comply with the terms of the lease option agreement dated October 10, 1993 within SO days; It is further ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that defendants/counter-plaintiffs shall be liable for plaintiff/counter-defendant’s reasonable costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses in the amount to be determined by the Court; 1 . Plaintiff argues that defendants have attempted to use the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to prevent disco ir.1990) (<HOLDING>); Pedrina v. Han Kuk Chun, 906 F.Supp. 1377,
holding that district court had ample authority to strike claimants affidavit offered in opposition to governments motion for summary judgment in forfeiture action after claimant invoked fifth amendment and refused to answer governments deposition questions holding that because claimant had asserted fifth amendment during discovery he may not submit affidavits in opposition to governments motion for summary judgment holding that interested partys affidavit opposed to motion for summary judgment and governments deposition to explore facts asserted in affidavit do not constitute distinct proceedings holding that district court need not consider evidence claimant presented to show that property subject to forfeiture proceedings was not acquired with proceeds of claimants husbands drug trafficking activity where claimant refused on fifth amendment grounds to answer governments deposition questions concerning same topics holding that deposition testimony offered in opposition to a motion for summary judgment in a medical malpractice case must reveal that the witness is competent to testify as to the matters at issue