proceeding. Debtor makes much ado in his memorandum and reply that a turnover action can only be brought if the property rights are not in dispute and cannot be used to demand assets whose title is in dispute. Once again, Debtor is mischaracterizing Plaintiffs claims. Plaintiff is not seeking to have the Trust assets turned over to the estate; rather, Plaintiff is seeking to have Debtor’s powers and rights in the Trusts turned over to the estate. The Trustee would then be able to utilize those rights and powers to the extent that Debtor would have been able to utilize them. The fact that Debtor has an interest in his rights and powers in the Trusts is not in dispute and a § 542 turnover action is properly brought by the Trustee and entertained by this Court. See Dean, 107 F.3d at 582 (<HOLDING>). Further, while it is true that a turnover
holding that a proceeding that by its nature could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case is a core matter subject to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code holding that  determining the nature and extent of property of the estate is also a fundamental function of a bankruptcy court and therefore the turnover action is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 usc  157b2a holding that a lawsuit by a third party creditor against the estate is a core proceeding holding that because property was no longer property of the estate the court could not order turnover