cause provided in subsection (a) or as established by case law. The only Florida Supreme Court decisions relevant to our consideration recognize the opposite principle of the majority’s conclusion: that probable cause can be found on the basis of hearsay and can support pretrial detention. Parker v. State, 843 So.2d 871, 880 (Fla.2003) (explaining that probable cause is the appropriate standard to apply to revocation of pretrial release based on a new arrest). Probable cause “traditionally has been decided by a magistrate in a nonadversary proceeding on hearsay and written testimony.” Id. (citing Gerstein v. Pugh, 420 U.S. 103, 120-22, 95 S.Ct. 854, 43 L.Ed.2d 54 (1975)) (emphasis added); Chavez v. State, 832 So.2d 730 (Fla.2002); Johnson v. State, 660 So.2d 648, 654 (Fla.1995) (<HOLDING>). I believe we should decline to follow the
holding that a known informants statement can support probable cause even though the affidavit fails to provide any additional basis for the known informants credibility holding that probable cause may be gleaned from the hearsay statements of informants holding probable cause exists based upon information received from a reliable eyewitness holding that probable cause can be established on the basis of unverified hearsay fleeting observations or by tips received by unnamed reliable informants holding that eyewitness accounts and an officers observations established probable cause