the execution of his duties.” Crawley, supra, 187 N.J. at 460-61, 901 A.2d 924. In Crawley, we stated A police officer who reasonably relies on information from headquarters in responding to an emergency or public safety threat may be said to be acting in good faith under the statute. However, a police officer who without any basis arbitrarily detains a person on the street would not be acting in good faith. [Id. at 461 n. 8, 901 A.2d 924.] A suspect is required to cooperate with the investigating officer even when the legal underpinning of the police-citizen encounter is questionable. See Williams, supra, 192 N.J. at 10, 926 A.2d 340 (“[Defendant was obliged to submit to the investiga tory stop, regardless of its constitutionality.”); Crawley, supra, 187 N.J. at 459-60, 901 A.2d 924 (<HOLDING>). When Delagarza announced his intention to
holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law holding that an officers reasonable mistake of law can give rise to the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the fourth amendment holding defendant committed obstruction by impeding stop despite officers lack of reasonable suspicion holding the location of an investigative stop is a factor that contributes to an officers reasonable suspicion holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop