and numbers set down by electronic recording. Notably, other state and federal courts, applying similar rules of evidence, have also determined that text messages constitute writings for the purposes of the best evidence rule. See United States v. Harry, 927 F.Supp.2d 1185, 1227 (D.N.M.2013) (applying the best evidence rule to text messages); Lorraine v. Market Am. Ins. Co., 241 F.R.D. 534, 577 (D.Md.2007); State v. Espiritu, 117 Hawai'i 127, 176 P.3d 885, 893 (2008) (noting that the best evidence rule is “particularly suited” to electronic evidence and admitting testimony about text messages under the best evidence rule when original messages and cell phone were unavailable and there was no evidence of proponent’s bad faith); Laughner v. State, 769 N.E.2d 1147, 1159 (Ind.Ct.App.2002) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 538 U.S. 1013, 123 S.Ct. 1929,
holding the sale valid as between the original parties despite noncompliance with the act holding that text messages sent between computers through an internet chat room were subject to the original writing rule and a printout of the messages was an original for purposes of that rule holding that public library was immune from suit under section 230 because it provided an interactive computer service by enabling multiple users to access the internet through its public computers holding that amendment of condemnors original complaint to substitute a new and different easement route was tantamount to abandonment of the original proceeding recognizing rule and holding that judgment against original purchaser entered after original purchaser had assigned contract to buy did not establish lien on property