Thus, even if there was a violation of rule 11 during the plea hearing, appellate courts must continue to inquire into whether there is evidence that the plea was nonetheless knowingly and voluntarily made. Id. 125. Accordingly, if a defendant's guilty plea was not knowing and voluntary and the district court refuses to allow a defendant to withdraw that plea, the federal Due Process Clause and our Plea Withdrawal Statute-not rule 11-would mandate that we reverse the district court's decision. We therefore proceed under the framework provided in Utah's Plea Withdrawal Statute. 19 Judges have discretion to grant a defendant's motion to withdraw a guilty plea only when "a defendant's plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered." State v. Ruiz, 2012 UT 29, ¶ 32, 282 P.3d 998 (<HOLDING>); see also Utax Cope § T77-13-6(2)(a) (2007). A
recognizing that military judges enjoy broad discretion on matters of continuance holding that defendant was responsible for the delay from the withdrawal of his guilty plea holding that the government was not responsible for delay from withdrawal of guilty plea holding that prosecution is generally entitled to specific performance or withdrawal of plea following defendants breach but because the government waived its right to withdrawal of plea only the possibility of specific performance remained recognizing that the revised plea withdrawal statute did away with the broad discretion previ ously given to judges on this matter