to demand class arbitration even when it was prohibited by their arbitration agreements. The Court held that this violated the central tenant of its arbitration precedent: to “ensur[e] that private arbitration agreements are enforced according to their terns.” We do not need to decide whether the arbitration agreement in this appeal prohibits statewide injunctive relief. The interpretation of an arbitration agreement is a question for arbitration. For example, in Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, the Ninth Circuit concluded that the question whether public injunctive relief could be granted in a student loan controversy was initially a question for the arbitrator. It was error for the superior court to decide that the arbitrator could order statewide injun 1251, 1254 (Alaska 2003) (<HOLDING>), 5 . See, e.g., La. Stadium & Exposition Dist.
holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue holding that the validity of a collateral waiver is a threshold issue holding that partys failure to develop issue in argument section constitutes waiver of issue holding without elaborating that waiver is an issue of fact holding that the waiver in two previous contracts was insufficient to support waiver of the contract at issue in that appeal