v. Davis, 70 F.Supp.2d 448, 454 (D.Del.1999) ("[sjexual conduct between prison guards and inmates destabilizes the prison environment by compromising the control and authority of the guard over the inmate, compromising the inmate's health, security .and well-being and creating tensions and conflicts among the inmates themselves”). 8 . Sufficiently harmful is defined as departing from "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society." Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958). 9 .The Court notes that in an abnormal case, other courts' decisional law may clearly establish a principle of law, but these "decisions must both point unmistakably to the unconstitutionality of the conduct complained of and be so clearly fore 0th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). 14 .See also Doe v. Rains County Indep. Sch.
holding that the initial inquiry for a court called upon to rule upon the qualified immunity issue is whether the facts alleged show the violation of a constitutional right holding that the court evaluating a claim of qualified immunity must first determine whether the plaintiff states a claim of a constitutional violation at all and then must determine whether the claimed right was clearly established before proceeding to the qualified immunity question holding that plaintiffs complaint stated a claim for a constitutional deprivation but that the contours of the right at issue were not clearly established and that official was therefore entitled to qualified immunity holding that the question of qualified immunity dovetails with the substantial inquiry in a  1983 action in that both depend on the specific contours of the constitutional right at issue holding that in determining whether a state officer is entitled to qualified immunity for  1983 purposes courts may not consider whether the constitutional right was clearly established before determining first that a constitutional right was violated