Several prospective jurors discussed their feelings about the different types of people who enter the country illegally, whether to "make a better life” or to "sell drugs and things like that.” Thus, appellant was aware from the outset of trial that his immigration status was at issue. 16 . She had been dating appellant approximately six months at the time of the collision. 17 . She further testified that they discussed getting married so appellant could get out on bond, which indicates that appellant was considering getting married for both purposes— to "stay” in the country and get out on bond. 18 .This case is distinguishable from one in which the record is completely silent regarding an appellant's knowledge of the consequences of his plea. See, e.g., Hwang, 130 S.W.3d at 500-01 (<HOLDING>). 19 . Appellant includes a section at the end
holding record insufficient to support inference appellant knew consequences of his plea when record is silent about whether appellant was actually informed that a guilty plea could result in his deportation holding statements during voir dire and oral motion in limine were merely opaque references to deportation but  silent about whether appellant was actually informed that a guilty plea could result in his deportation and insufficient to support inference appellant knew consequences of his plea holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea holding that appellant was harmed by trial courts failure to admonish him of deportation consequences of his guilty plea where the record was silent about whether he was ever specifically informed that his guilty plea could result in deportation and record showed that appellant moved to the united states from korea holding trial judges statement during voir dire that appellant likely would be automatically deported if released on probation along with references to deportation by defense counsel and prospective jurors supported inference that appellant knew consequences of plea