Court for the District of New Jersey. The Funds sought to have Satnick produce the records at issue so that the Funds could verify whether Satnick was delinquent in its contributions. In February of 1996, Satnick and the plaintiffs entered into a Stipulation allowing the plaintiffs to audit Satnick’s books and records. According to the plaintiffs, both parties reserved the right to argue later whether Satniek’s refusal to produce its records affected the statute of limitations in a subsequent delinquency action. The audit was conducted between April 22, 1996 and May 3, 1996. At the conclusion, plaintiffs advised Satnick that it was delinquent in the amount of $242,011.93 — $157,-669.89, plus interest of $84,342.04. On June 3, 1996, the plaintiffs then brought this a 7 (3d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>) The plaintiffs filed this action to recover
holding that the value of a car for which the employer supplied the fuel and paid for the insurance was part of the husbands income holding that the employer was not the insurers agent holding an employee is an agent of his employer where the employer assumes the right to control time manner and method of work holding that the identity of a police agent had to be revealed where the defendant whose sole defense was entrapment sought to establish that the police agent had conceived planned and urged the perpetration of the crime holding tolling inappropriate where employer supplied plaintiff with figures which would have revealed deficiency to reasonably diligent agent for trustees