conclusion, the court summarized the policy underlying the IDEA: The statutory framework of the IDEA and the statute’s purpose show that a five-year statute of limitations would frustrate the federal policy of quick resolution of IDEA claims. The IDEA provides for substantial parental involvement in the IEP [individualized educational program] process, annual reviews, and annual notice to parents of procedural rights. See 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)[ (1) ](B)(i) (parents must be part of IEP team); 20 U.S.C. § 1414(d)(4)(A)© (annual review); 20 U.S.C. § 1415(b)-(d) (notice of procedural rights). This statutory scheme mandating parental participation in an annual decision-making process demonstrates that Congress intended for parents to be actively implicated in the expeditiou 56 (8th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); Manning, 176 F.3d at 239 (holding that, in
holding that the threeyear statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions in arkansas governed idea claims holding that the new jersey statute of limitations applicable to  1983 actions is njsa 2a142 holding that new york statute of limitations for  1983 actions was three years holding that the applicable statute of limitations in fraudulent conveyance action brought by fdic was a sixyear term for contract actions rather than a threeyear term applicable to actions for money damages founded upon a tort holding that new yorks threeyear residual statute of limitations for personal injury claims not embraced by specific statutes rather than oneyear statute of limitations for intentional torts governed  1983 action