Hallett should not have entered the intersection until it was apparent that all drivers were clear of his intentions and had yielded the right of way for safe passage.” 3. Alan Baxter Baxter gave deposition testimony that in his opinion, Hallett “did not proceed safely” through the intersection. He also stated that when Hallett entered the intersection against the light, he exhibited “reckless disregard” and “conscious indifference” for the safety of others. C. Analysis Sparks contends that the evidence establishes, or at least raises a fact issue, regarding whether Hallett acted recklessly or in conscious disregard of a high degree of risk of harm to others. We disagree. DPS’s undisputed evidence establishes that Trooper Hallett was res W.3d 695, 701-02 (Tex.App.-Austin 2005, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Smith, 126 S.W.3d at 545-46 (holding evidence
holding prison official must have acted with reckless disregard for the inmates safety holding no evidence of reckless disregard for safety of others when officer entered intersection without stopping and witness did not hear brakes being applied holding witnesss statement that firefighter entered intersection without stopping and witness did not hear brakes being applied was not evidence of recklessness or conscious indifference holding that cjulpable negligence is negligence of a gross and flagrant character which evinces a reckless disregard for the safety of others holding officers failure to adhere to policy requiring emergency vehicles to come to complete stop and failure to remember looking both ways before entering intersection did not raise fact issue as to whether officer acted in conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for safety of others