Plaintiff has not made any such showing here, Plaintiff also seeks to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Compl. 3. However, this Court lacks jurisdiction over claims brought under § 1983, as jurisdiction over these claims is vested exclusively in the district courts. 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (2012); see also Clemmons v. United States, 283 Fed.Appx, 786, 787 (Fed. Cir. 2008); Buck v. United States, No. 11-209C, 2011 WL 2633624, at *3 (Fed. Cl. July 6, 2011). Plaintiff also alleges a violation of section 4 of the Fourteenth • Amendment, which addresses the validity of the public debt. Compl. 6. This Court does not have jurisdiction to hear claims under the Fourteenth Amendment, as it is not money-mandating. LeBlanc v. United States, 50 F.8d 1025, 1028 (Fed. Cir. 1995) (<HOLDING>); see also Schirripa v. United States, No.
holding that the court of federal claims had jurisdiction to decide an alleged due process violation related to his claim for damages under a moneymandating statute holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action holding that violations of the fourteenth amendment are insufficient bases for jurisdiction in this court as it is not moneymandating holding that the court lacks jurisdiction over sixth amendment claims because the sixth amendment is not moneymandating holding that bankruptcy jurisdiction is not within section 5 of the fourteenth amendment