“walked by the monument”); McCreary County v. ACLU, 545 U.S. 844, 852, 125 S.Ct. 2722, 162 L.Ed.2d 729 (2005) (county citizens saw Ten Commandments display that was “readily visible” to them when they used courthouse to conduct civic business); County of Allegheny v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573, 587-88, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989) (local residents saw creche in county courthouse and menorah on town property); Lynch v. Donnelly, 465 U.S. 668, 671, 104 S.Ct. 1355, 79 L.Ed.2d 604 (1984) (local residents saw creche on town property); Marsh v. Chambers, 463 U.S. 783, 784-86, 103 S.Ct. 3330, 77 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1983) (member of legislature heard prayer at opening of each legislative session); cf Salazar v. Buono, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1803, 1812, 176 L.Ed.2d 634 (2010) (opinion of Kennedy, J.) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, the fact that a large number of
holding that the display of a creche as a part of a public christmas display depicts the historical origins of this traditional event long recognized as a national holiday holding that plaintiffs have standing to assert establishment clause violation because in part a cross led plaintiffs to alter their behavior holding impermissible the prominent display of a cross on a public building holding that plaintiffs have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the presence of a cross in a city park even though the cross was neither erected nor financially maintained by the government recognizing that plaintiffs standing to challenge public display of a cross was accepted in prior lowercourt decision