trial, Mr. Eastom’s written statement was read to the jury. It stated: On 2/8/07, police officers came to my house and found several guns and some weed and meth. I acknowledge that it’s mine and not LaDonna Wynn’s. A chick brought over some stuff that was hers, guns and some black bags and a white box. I wrote this on my own free will. The only weapon that the officer recovered that was mine was the [Sig Sauer]. From this statement a reasonable jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Mr. Eastom both possessed the methamphetamine and knew that he possessed it. In addition, Officer Henderson testified that he discovered a black duffle bag in the central bedroom of Mr. Eastom’s house that contained two firearms, two digital scales, and a pill bottle. See Allen, 235 F.3d at 492 (<HOLDING>). A Tulsa forensic scientist testified that the
holding the large quantity of drugs sufficient evidence of intent to distribute holding that uncharged amounts of drugs may be included as relevant conduct even if the defendant never actually possessed or distributed the drugs holding that something more than mere presence in the car in which drugs are found is required to sustain a conviction for the substantive offense of possession with intent to distribute holding that the presence of firearms may go toward proving that a defendant possessed drugs with the intent to distribute holding that juries may infer an intent to distribute narcotics from the presence of firearms