nursing and case management. Unlike Jan Klosterman, she is not a Certified Nurse Life Care Planner, and thus she did not follow the same methodology. Ms. Vinett-Mitchell collaborated with the Government’s expert nephrologist, Dr. Atta, in developing her life care plan. In formulating her opinions regarding the cost of Mr. Clanton’s future medical care, Ms. Vinett-Mitchell assumed that Mr. Clanton would live to roughly age 65, his donor kidneys would last twelve years, and he would need one additional transplant, three years of dialysis prior to second transplant, and three years of dialysis at the end of his life. As detailed in her written report, Ms. Vinett-Mitchell ultimately opined that Mr. Clanton’s future medical costs would be a 2013 WL 1149247, at *3 (M.D. Pa. Mar. 19, 2013) (<HOLDING>); Orenstein v. United States, Case No.
holding that statement about deceased veteran made by va intake clerk during an interview with va legal counsel was admissible under rule 801d2d when offered against the government in ftca medical malpractice case holding that exculpatory statement made by defendant to a nurse and recorded in the nurses notes was not admissible under rule 8034 because it was not reasonably pertinent to diagnosis and treatment holding that anonymous statement was admissible as a statement by a partys agent under rule 801d2d and noting that a district court should be presented with sufficient evidence to conclude that the person who is alleged to have made the damaging statement is in fact a party or an agent of that party holding that appellants own statement when offered by appellant was selfserving and not admissible under the declarationagainstpenalinterest exception to the hearsay rule holding that nurses statement made during the course of treating the plaintiff was admissible under rule 801d2d when offered against the government in ftca case