provided. However, it appears from the partial tran-seripts that she was to be asked to provide testimony as to the reasonableness of the charges by reading the contents of the medical bills that had not been admitted into evidence. T 41 The Utah Rules of Evidence and Utah case law require that the medical bills themselves be used to prove their contents. The exceptions to the best evidence rule are not applicable in this case. Furthermore, where a party has been properly sanctioned by the trial court, and thereby precluded from admitting any exhibits, we cannot allow the sanctioned party to then cireumvent the law by reading into evidence the contents of the exhibits that have been precluded. This would reward the sanctioned party by putting it into a st 9, 264 A.2d 796, 801 (1970) (<HOLDING>); McMunn v. Tatum, 237 Va. 558, 379 S.E.2d 908,
holding that court properly admitted bills physician testified were reasonable and reasonably necessarily incurred holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion when it found that no foundation had established bills were caused by and were reasonable and necessary results of accident holding that state did not submit sufficient evidence to establish amount of restitution to victim for medical bills incurred when it did not introduce any medical bills holding that plaintiff could not recover medical bills that were discharged in bankruptcy holding that statute does not alleviate plaintiffs burden to provide additional evidence that medical bills were reasonable and necessary