he has failed to provide any evidence of good faith efforts towards repayment of his student loans. And, as noted by the District Court in Brunner, it is the Debt- or’s burden to establish that “the forces preventing repayment are truly beyond his ... reasonable control. ” Brunner, 46 B.R. 752, 756 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (emphasis added). The Debtor’s employment history, replete with examples of attitude and behavior undermining opportunities to maximize income, even to the extent of preventing him from working additional hours at his present employment, is relevant in assessing the third prong as well. Good faith is measured by a debtor’s “efforts to obtain employment, maximize income, and minimize expenses ... and to undertake all other reasonable efforts , 515 F.3d 319, 325 (4th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); O’Hearn, supra, 339 F.3d at 566 (“[i]t is not
holding that al though the material sought was work product the party seeking discovery showed that it would not be able to obtain the materials without undue hardship holding that the bankruptcy court lacked the power under  105a to grant the partial discharge of student loan debt when the debtor did not show undue hardship as required by statute holding that it is not holding that it is not an undue hardship for a teacher to work a full calendar year recognizing that although the fourth circuit has not yet addressed the issue partial discharge may be granted to the extent that it would be an undue hardship for the debtor to have to pay that portion of the loan that is to be discharged