1285 (1992) (same); People v. Knox, 186 Ill.App.3d 808, 134 Ill.Dec. 564, 542 N.E.2d 910 (1989) (same). The California Supreme Court, in People v. Burton, 6 Cal.3d 375, 99 Cal.Rptr. 1, 491 P.2d 793 (1971), held that the denial by police of a juvenile defendant’s request to see his parent rendered his subsequent confession inadmissible. The court found that the defendant’s “request to see his parents at or near the commencement of interrogation was an invocation of his Fifth Amendment privilege” against self-incrimination. Id. 99 Cal.Rptr. 1, 491 P.2d at 796. Likewise, Florida and Montana have held that a juvenile’s request to telephone or otherwise speak to a parent is tantamount to the invocation of his right to remain silent. Sublette v. State, 365 So.2d 775 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1978) (<HOLDING>); State v. Johnson, 221 Mont. 503, 719 P.2d
holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege holding that juveniles request for parent is invocation of fifth amendment rights holding that defendants exercise of right to testify in own behalf waives his fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination holding that the constitutional privilege against selfincrimination is applicable in the case of juveniles as it is with respect to adults holding that juveniles request to call parent is assertion of fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination