{¶ 49} No right to a jury trial exists in juvenile proceedings under the United States or Ohio Constitutions. McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 403 U.S. 528, 545, 91 S.Ct. 1976, 29 L.Ed.2d 647 (1971); In re Agler, 19 Ohio St.2d 70, 249 N.E.2d 808 (1969), paragraph two of the syllabus. However, as this court stated in State v. Walls, 96 Ohio St.3d 437, 2002-Ohio-5059, 775 N.E.2d 829, ¶ 26, Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Andrew T. French, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. numerous constitutional safeguards normally reserved for criminal prosecutions are equally applicable to juvenile delinquency proceedings. [In re Anderson, 92 Ohio St.3d 63] 66, 748 N.E.2d 67 [2001], citing In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 31-57, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 [1967] (<HOLDING>), and In re Winship (1970), 397 U.S. 358,
holding that aliens in deportation hearings enjoy due process protections under the fifth amendment holding that both fourth amendment warrant and probable cause and fifth amendment due process requirements apply to civil forfeiture proceedings holding that eighth amendment protections against cruel and unusual punish ment do not apply to deportation proceedings holding that various fifth and sixth amendment protections apply to juvenile proceedings holding that the fifth amendment did not apply to tribal government