any person or persons charged with or alleged to be interfering with the marital relationship between a husband and wife, in violation of the law or of the rights of either party to the marriage, or whose presence to the proceedings may be found necessary to a complete determination of the issues therein, or the relief to which the parties thereto, or any of them, may be entitled; and shall have the power to enjoin and restrain such interference and to punish for contempt of court violations of such injunctions or restraining orders. S.C.Code Ann. § 20-7-420(19) (1985). In the past, subsection (19) has been construed to grant authority over third parties when property claimed to be marital was titled in a third party’s name. See Sexton v. Sexton, 298 S.C. 359, 380 S.E.2d 832 (1989) (<HOLDING>). The legislature has granted the family court
holding the family court has jurisdiction to join third parties when property is alleged to be marital but is owned by a third party holding there is no duty to third parties on the part of a premises owner who could not have foreseen the criminal acts of third parties recognizing that either party to a divorce action may bring in third parties who claim an interest in the property alleged to be community or third parties themselves may intervene and have their rights therein determined holding that trial court cannot divide real property owned solely by third party witness holding that a third party has authority to consent to a search if the third party is a coinhabitant