exercised its independent and disinterested business judgment in responding to a demand.” Ishimaru v. Fung, 2005 WL 2899680, at *12 (Del.Ch. Oct. 26, 2005); see also 6 Del. C. § 18-1001 (providing LLC members and assignees the right "to bring an action in the Court of Chancery in the right of a limited liability company to recover a judgment in its favor” when managers or members with authority to do so have refused, or an effort to cause them to do so “is not likely to succeed”); id. § 18-1003 ("In a derivative action, the complaint shall set forth with particularity the effort, if any, of the plaintiff to secure initiation of the action by a manager or member or the reasons for not making the effort.”); Eureka VIII LLC v. Niagara Falls Hldgs. LLC, 899 A.2d 95, 96 (Del.Ch.20Q6) (<HOLDING>). D. Parties’ Contentions Zimmerman brings this
recognizing claim for wrongful dissociation based on members ceasing participation in the llcs management and ceasing honoring its duties and obligations under the llc agreement holding that a fiduciary corporation was a purchaser within the meaning of  12a2 and was entitled to bring suit on its own behalf or on behalf of its clients holding that broker owed no fiduciary duty to client as a matter of law holding that a shareholder who disposes of his shares loses standing to bring a derivative action no longer a shareholder in the corporation the defendant cannot maintain a derivative action on its behalf recognizing the right of an llc member or assignee to bring a derivative action on behalf of the llc when another member breaches a contractual or fiduciary duty owed to the llc