produced a total offense level of 12. The District Court also concluded, based on Mr. Crepeau’s criminal history, that he was in criminal history category II. Based on the foregoing, the advisory sentencing range is 12 to 18 months’ imprisonment. The District Court sentenced him to the lowest level of the applicable Guidelines range — 12 months and one day. The only possible error in calculating the advisory sentencing range would be in the District Court’s application of the two-level enhancement because the offense involved more than two threats. But in his plea agreement and at his change-of-plea hearing, Mr. Crepeau admitted that he sent three separate threatening emails to Ms. Lane and one to another bank employee. See United States v. Scott, 441 F.3d 1322, 1327 (11th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Stokes, 347 F.3d 103, 106
holding that when three distinct threats were made  2a61b2 was properly applied even though there were only two mailings holding that instructions for terroristic threats were proper even though the court failed to instruct on transitory anger holding that even though attorneys fees were not properly awardable under rule 68 costs excluding fees were mandatory holding that three denied promotions over the course of three years where the decisions were made by three different selection officials and involved different qualifications were not sufficiently related to constitute a continuing violation holding that even though the complaint was dismissed without prejudice as a sanction for misconduct and even though the order of dismissal was therefore not an adjudication on the merits the defendants were nevertheless properly considered the prevailing party for purposes of attorneys fees