compel the testimony of a non-judgment debtor third party at a supplemental proceeding. No language in Wis. Stat. § 816.06 grants this right to the judgment creditor. Therefore, to accept Crown Castle's argument, we would have to conclude that even though the statute is silent, it nonetheless confers a right on the judgment creditor to compel testimony from non-judgment debtor third parties. ¶ 25. We cannot interpret the silence of the statute to create a statutory right. Instead, we conclude that § 816.06 does not grant judgment creditors the right to compel the testimony of a non-judgment debtor third party at a supplemental proceeding. This is so because courts are not entitled to grant or expand statutory rights based solely on a statute's silence. See Harvot, 320 Wis. 2d 1, ¶ 50 (<HOLDING>); Relyea, 102 Wis. at 303-04 (holding that
recognizing that courts routinely take judicial notice of documents filed in other courts holding that the courts should not undertake ad hoc judicial discovery of implied statutory rights holding order of contempt sentence without statutory opportunity for appeal was in error but nevertheless involved a judicial act subject to judicial immunity recognizing that courts should exercise judicial restraint in a facial challenge holding that another courts decision is a proper subject of judicial notice