The trial court also imposed the maximum fine authorized by the jury, forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000). In this appeal as of right, the defendant raises the following four issues for this Court to consider: 1. the trial court erred in allowing the prosecution to present evidence of uncharged sexual misconduct unrelated to the counts in the indictment in its case-in-ehief; 2. the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on lesser included offenses; 3. the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences; and, 4. the trial court erred in imposing fines totalling forty-five thousand dollars ($45,000). We find that the defendant’s first issue has merit, and his convictions are t 1989 WL 100223 Washington County (Tenn.Crim.App. filed August 31, 1989, at Knoxville) (<HOLDING>). After hearing argument from both the State
holding that evidence of uncharged incest with the same victim is admissible to illustrate the relationship existing between the defendant and the victim holding that evidence of prior uncharged sexual conduct with the victim is admissible to corroborate the victims testimony holding evidence of past uncharged sexual encounters admissible in child sexual abuse case to show relationship between defendant and alleged victim holding that uncharged sexual acts committed upon the same victim are admissible to show the conduct of the defendant toward the victim and to corroborate the evidence of the offense charged in the indictment holding that prior uncharged sexual conduct between the defendant and the victim is admissible to show their state of intimacy as well as to explain the circumstances surrounding the offense