CURIAM. The government appeals from a decision of the district court dismissing its civil forfeiture claim as violative of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment. United States v. 154 Manley Rd., 908 F.Supp. 1070, 1083 (D.R.I.1995). The parties agree, and we are likewise persuaded, that the judgment below must be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Ursery, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 2135, 135 L.Ed.2d 549 (1996) (<HOLDING>), and the case remanded for further
holding that in rem civil forfeitures under 21 usc  881a7 are neither punishment nor criminal for purposes of the double jeopardy clause holding double jeopardy clause applicable to civil penalties under the false claims act holding that forfeiture is not barred by the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment because it involves neither two criminal trials nor two criminal punishments holding that unlike under the federal constitution a civil forfeiture is punishment under the new mexico double jeopardy clause holding that a delinquency proceeding places a juvenile in jeopardy for purposes of the double jeopardy clause