there are competing public interests. On the one hand, there is a public interest in protecting the integrity of the patent system and therefore, granting an injunction to ensure that a patentee has an exclusive right to its patent. On the other hand, in cases where the infringing product is valuable to the public-at-large, there may be a public interest in denying the injunction. The Federal Circuit has said: Typically, in a patent infringement case, although there exists a public interest in protecting rights secured by valid patents, the focus of the district court’s public interest analysis should be whether there exists some critical public interr est that would be injured by the grant of preliminary relief. Hybritech Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 849 F.2d 1446, 1458 (Fed.Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); Wesley-Jessen Division of Schering Corp. v.
holding that it was not an abuse of discretion to enjoin some products but not others holding it was not an abuse of discretion to exclude testimony holding that lower courts application of a some effort standard was an abuse of discretion holding not an abuse of discretion to deny funds holding it was not an abuse of discretion to deny funds