the probable cause finding, the search warrant must be voided and the fruits of the search excluded. See Franks, 438 U.S. at 156, 98 S.Ct. 2674. Here, there was an ex parte prewarrant hearing during which Officer McGrew testified that Flake was convicted of child molestation in 1991. That was an untrue statement. McGrew misrepresented the age of the victim by stating that she was a minor when she was actually over the age of majority. McGrew misrepresented the circumstances of the offense by stating that Flake had forced the victim into his vehicle when, in reality, she had been hitchhiking and entered the vehicle voluntarily. McGrew ultimately misrepre sented the type of conviction by stating that it was child molestation whe d States v. Chesher, 678 F.2d 1353, 1360-62 (9th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). We also hold that McGrew’s misrepresentations
holding that the findings of reviewing physicians constituted substantial evidence in support of the secretarys decision to deny benefits holding that an agents omission of evidence that was readily available to him constituted a substantial preliminary showing of recklessness holding that recklessness not merely the violation of a city ordinance must be shown for assault with a firearm conviction holding that it was an abuse of discretion to admit the record when an admission was available holding that misdemeanor violation of carrying an unlicensed firearm was sufficient without a showing of recklessness or negligence for an involuntary manslaughter conviction