the Court to look to state law for a definition of those terms. The Debtor relies on K.S.A. 59-604 to support his position that the terms “bequest” and “devise” are limited to the transfer of property by way of will. Although K.S.A. 59-604 does not provide a definition of these terms, their use in this statute is certainly consistent with the Debtor’s position and does indicate that, under Kansas law, the terms “devise” and “bequest” involve transfers of property by way of will. Although Kansas has not directly defined the terms “bequest,” “devise” or “inheritance,” the Court believes it only reasonable that Kansas would follow the traditional meaning of these terms, as set forth in Black’s Law Dictionary. Black’s Law Dictionary provides the following definitions of “beques 1990) (<HOLDING>); In re Schauer, 246 B.R. 384
holding that payments made to a debtor from inter vivos trusts within 180 days of filing the petition are not interests by way of bequest devise or inheritance and are not part of the bankruptcy estate holding that the court is constrained to give a narrow construction to the words bequest devise and inheritance and to conclude such words do not encompass revocable inter vivos trusts holding that income payment debtor received from spendthrift trusts or was entitled to receive by terms of the trusts within 180 days of filing of debtors bankruptcy petition constituted bequests and became property of debt ors estate under  541a5a holding that ijnter vivos trust distributions are not considered interest obtained by bequest devise or inheritance  holding that inter vivos trusts are not considered interest obtained by bequest devise or inheritance