equal pay could amount tó a materially adverse ac tion in some circumstances); Kessler v. Westchester County Dept. of Soc. Services, 461 F.3d 199, 202, 210 (2d Cir.2006) (finding. a fact issue where a transfer stripped employee of many of his earlier management responsibilities, even though the employee was never disciplined, suspended, or written up and his salary, benefits, and hours were not decreased). Moreover, she no longer reported directly to the Vice President for Finance; instead, she reported to the new Senior Associate Vice President, an individual with no previous finance experience. Such an action is some evidence that she lost job prestige. See Gray. v. City of Galveston, No. 14-12-00183-CV, 2013 WL 2247386, at *9 (Tex. App. — Houston [14th Dist.] May 21, 2013, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, Ward testified that she lost her
recognizing that the government agreed not to take a position holding governments position unreasonable where government advanced no legal authority for its position and applicable principle of law was long settled holding that attendance can be an essential function of a position and that excessive absenteeism rendered an employee unqualified for such a position holding appellants reassignment from a command position to an investigative position where he reported to an officer with a lower rank and no longer served as a direct report to the chief of police supported a conclusion that appellant was transferred to a less prestigious position recognizing that an employers decision to eliminate a position is a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for terminating a position or employee