Stephens. As we stated above, Orix’s security agreement granted Orix a security interest in three specific pieces of equipment and: goods, chattels, machinery, equipment, inventory, accounts, chattel paper, notes receivable, accounts receivable, furniture, fixtures and property of every kind and nature, wherever located, now or hereafter belonging to the Mortgagor. Orix argues that this description is broad enough to cover the monies payable under the BFI agreement. Orix contends that the description covers all of W.T. Stephens’ personal property and extends to after acquired property, which the BFI agreement amounts would be since the agreement was not executed until several months after the security agreement was filed. In this argume inneapolis, 292 Minn. 277, 194 N.W.2d 775 (1972) (<HOLDING>). Orix also cites Unicut, a Texas case decided
holding description all tangible personal property now owned by the debtor or which may hereafter be acquired sufficient to cover equipment holding that insurance policys exclusion of vehicles owned by furnished for or made available for the regular use of the named insured from the definition of an underinsured motor vehicle is valid holding description all personal property sufficient to cover equipment holding description all of the goods then owned or to be owned in the future sufficient to cover equipment and vehicles holding the purpose of a checkpoint was valid when officers stopped vehicles to look for any violations on the vehicles such as drivers license equipment or inspection