against aliens within the United States pursuant to administrative proceedings under section 1252(b) of this title or comparable provisions of any prior Act, except that— (6) Consolidation Whenever a petitioner seeks review of an order under this section, any review sought with respect to a motion to reopen or reconsider such an order shall be consolidated with the review of the order.... This language provides for consolidation of reviews, apparently Recognizing the possibility that two different orders could be under consideration: If a deportation order were automatically rendered nonfinal by virtue of the filing of a motion to reconsider, multiple reviewable orders would not exist to consolidate. See Akrap v. INS, 966 F.2d 267, 271 (7th Cir.1992); but see Ogio, 2 F.3d at 960-61 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we join those circuits which
holding issue raised for first time in motion for reconsideration constituted waiver holding that the filing of a motion for reconsideration does not toll the period for seeking judicial review of the underlying order holding that timely filing of rule 35c predecessor to rule 35a  motion renders otherwise final order of district court nonfinal until disposition of that motion recognizing that both final and nonfinal orders may be the subject of motions for reconsideration holding that motion for reconsideration renders deportation order nonfinal despite language of the 1990 amendments