had reached the merits of the case under the public interest exception, but decided that the lower court erred in reaching the mer its and dismissed the case as moot. Id. at 766. The supreme court, in briefly commenting upon the public interest exception, stated: This Court has not previously decided the viability of the public interest exception, and we find it unnecessary to reach that issue here. As articulated by the court of appeals, the public interest exception permits judicial review of questions of considerable publ el, No. 05-0600990-CV, 1998 WL 122409 *1 n. 3 (Tex.App.-Dallas March 20,1998, no pet.) (not designated for publication) (refusing to recognize public interest exception); Univ. Interscholastic League v. Buchanan, 848 S.W.2d 298, 304 (Tex.App.-Austin 1993, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, there is a case from this court,
recognizing exception recognizing public policy exception to atwill doctrine recognizing the public interest exception recognizing such an exception recognizing the rule and the exception but holding facts did not support claim to exception