Acosta argues that the counterclaim fails to sufficiently plead the second and third elements. “If a plaintiff does not allege private facts, the other three elements of the tort need not be reached.” Busse v. Motorola, Inc., 351 Ill.App.3d 67, 72, 286 Ill.Dec. 320, 813 N.E.2d 1013 (3rd Dist.2004). Examples of inherently “private facts” include “a person’s financial, medical, or sexual life, or a peculiarly private fact of an intimate[,] personal nature.” Green v. Chicago Tribune Co., 286 Ill.App.3d 1, 18, 221 Ill.Dec. 342, 675 N.E.2d 249 (1st Dist.1996)(Cahill J., dissenting). In contrast, matters of public record, such as a name, address, date of birth and fact of marriage have been held not to be private facts. See e.g. Busse, 351 Ill.App.3d at 72, 286 Ill.Dec. 320, 813 N.E.2d 1013 (<HOLDING>). A plaintiff must also ■ allege that he
holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits holding a social security number is not private holding that basic identification data such as name age current address and social security number is not generally subject to miranda holding that a social security disability determination is a legal proceeding holding social security administration claims manual is not binding agency rule