funds analogous to that suggested by Rowand. See In re Initiative Petition No. 363, State Question No. 672, 927 P.2d 558, 566 (Okla.1996) (rejecting a challenge under a single-subject provision of the Oklahoma Constitution to an initiative proposing a constitutional amendment to legalize casino gambling which also earmarked revenues for specific computer-related educational purposes, local governments, and correctional institutions, reasoning that the "the elements of taxability, distribution of gaming revenue and of civil liability for debts incurred in gaming to be authorized are germane to the general subject of legalization and regulation of authorized casino gambling” (emphasis in original)); Floridians Against Casino Takeover v. Let’s Help Florida, 363 So.2d 337 (Fla.1978) (<HOLDING>); Kennedy Wholesale, Inc. v. State Bd. of
holding that an initiative permitting the operation of casinos in a portion of florida which allocated resultant income from gambling taxation to general purposes of public education and law enforcement did not violate the singlesubject provision of the florida constitution recognizing that although the initiative would supersede a statutory provision revoke the discretion of the board of medicine and limit the legislatures power to enact any other law in conflict with the proposed amendment these effects were not sufficiently substantial to constitute the type of multiple precipitous and cataclysmic changes that the singlesubject requirement is designed to prevent holding that a provision of the constitution is to be construed in the sense in which it was understood by the framers and the people at the time of its adoption but that if new products or circumstances that did not exist at the time the constitutional provision was enacted fall within the meaning of the provision the constitutional provision applies to them holding that central assessment by the unit method of valuation did not violate the equal protection clause of the united states constitution or the uniform operation of laws provision in the utah constitution holding the doctrine of great public importance allows a citizen to challenge a bill under the singlesubject clause of the south carolina constitution