Texas. Transportation within a state can be interstate in nature and subject to the Secretary of Transportation’s jurisdiction if the transportation is part of a “practical continuity of movement” of goods bound for destinations beyond the state. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 317 U.S. 564, 568, 63 S.Ct. 332, 87 L.Ed. 460 (1943); Merchants Fast Motor Lines, 528 F.2d at 1044; Galbreath v. Gulf Oil Corp., 413 F.2d 941, 944 (5th Cir.1969); Shew v. Southland Corp. (Cabell’s Dairy Division), 370 F.2d 376, 380 (5th Cir.1966) (stating that the transport of goods originating out of state remains interstate if the interstate and intrastate legs of the journey form a continuous movement). Once goods enter into “the channels of interstate commerce,” a stop in the movem 1, 917 (5th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); Galbreath, 413 F.2d at 942, 947 (holding that
holding nonresident partnership not subject to personal jurisdiction of texas court although it sold and shipped to texas plaintiff goods that were subject of breach of contract claim holding that jurisdiction existed over nonresident printing customer despite the fact that texas printer solicited the business in alabama and nonresident sent no personnel to texas because nonresident placed additional orders from which it expected to profit sent payments to texas sent and received printing materials to and from texas paid for shipping of printed goods from texas and sent payments to texas the transactions were governed by texas law and substantial part of performance occurred in texas holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied holding that local delivery drivers operate in interstate commerce when they drive vehicles loaded with goods that were shipped to texas from another state temporarily stored at a warehouse in texas then delivered to a texas customer via local delivery drivers holding that dairy products that originated outside of texas and shipped to texas then stopped in dallas were part of a continuous movement in interstate commerce the truck drivers who delivered the products locally in texas were engaged in interstate commerce for purpose of the motor carrier act exemption