designed to cut down the debtors rights and free the secured party of his duties____ The default situation offers great scope for overreaching; the suspicious attitude of the courts has been grounded in common sense. 13 Pa.Cons.Stat. § 9504 comment 4. The plain language of the statute seems to dic tate the construction that a debtor cannot waive the requirement that a disposition of collateral be in all respects commercially reasonable. The only state or federal case addressing waiver of the right to a commercially reasonable sale of collateral stated, “A creditor’s duty ... upon default to dispose of the collateral in a commercially reasonable manner is not subject to waiver or modification by agreement.” Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Lototsky, 549 F.Supp. 996, 1001-02 (E.D.Pa.1982) (<HOLDING>). Despite the apparently clear language of the
holding that the validity of a collateral waiver is a threshold issue holding that a guarantor is unable to make a predefault waiver of the right to a commercially reasonable disposition of collateral holding that the word waiver is not required to waive a right even when a statute requires clear and unmistakable evidence of waiver holding that a plea agreement with a waiver of direct appeal rights does not include a waiver of collateral remedies because the government could have included a waiver of collateral rights in the plea agreement and chose not to do so holding that the right to support is not subject to waiver by either parent