this opinion. 1 . Malone v. Malone, 587 P.2d 1167, 1167 (Alaska 1978) (noting "the court has broad discretion [to divide property] which will be interfered with on appeal only in cases of clear injustice"). 2 . Sampson v. Sampson, 14 P.3d 272, 275 (Alaska 2000). 3 . Hansen v. Hansen, 119 P.3d 1005, 1009 (Alaska 2005) (quoting Lewis v. Lewis, 785 P.2d 550, 558 (Alaska 1990)). 4 . Id. (citing Moffitt v. Moffitt, 749 P.2d 343, 346 (Alaska 1988)). 5 . Id. 6 . Id. at 1013. 7 . "Usufructory" is derived from the noun, "usu-fruct," which is "[the right of using and enjoying and receiving the profits of property that belongs to another." Brack's Law Dictionary 1544 (6th ed.1990). 8 . Schmitz v. Schmitz, 88 P.3d 1116, 1125 (Alaska 2004). 9 . Harrower v. Harrower, 71 P.3d 854, 858 (Alaska 2003) (<HOLDING>) (citing Green v. Green, 29 P.3d 854, 858
holding that shares of stock in husbands name had not been transmuted holding void shares issued in excess of the amount of common shares authorized in the articles of incorporation holding in action for breach of contract caused by wrongful foreclosure and sale of shares of stock plaintiff was entitled to recover the fair market value of the stock at the time of its sale holding that rule 11 agreement stating that one party would return shares of stock for a specific amount of money contained essential terms holding in forfeiture case that circumstances surrounding mothers conveyance of stock to her soninlaw were sufficient under wisconsin law to create constructive trust in stock in daughters favor where testimony showed such was intent of conveyance despite facts that stock registered in husbands name and that no documentation supported testimony