of premium paid by you. If you have correctly stated your age on the application for insurance, coverage will remain in effect and benefits will be paid for any valid claim. This language is similar to that in the Loan Two form and once again contains contradictory language which suggests coverage once a policy has been issued and then also suggests that premiums could be returned at any time. Therefore, the court finds that there is a material factual dispute over whether the Credit Life coverage in Loan Three would be effective. The Defendants counter this conclusion by citing Georgia decisions which es-top an insurer who accepts insurance premiums from later denying claims upon that policy. American Home Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Harvey, 99 Ga.App. 582, 109 S.E.2d 822, 324 (1959) (<HOLDING>). However, other decisions have denied an
holding 65 year age condition was legally waived when insurer accepted premiums holding that warrantless search as probation condition was a valid limitation to the defendants fourth amendment rights when defendant asserted the condition was not reasonably related to rehabilitation holding that court of appeals was without jurisdiction to modify judgment against insurer because judgment against insurer became final when it failed to appeal holding that recovery from the tortfeasors insurer is a condition precedent to a claim for uim benefits holding defendant waived complaint