the County filed a petition with the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“Bureau”) in which’ it sought reimbursement from the Section 443 Fund of the workers’ compensation benefits and the unreasonable contest attorney’s fees it paid as a result of the WCAB’s erroneous collateral estoppel determination. See Section 443 of the Workers’ Compensation Act, 77 P.S. § 999 (providing for reimbursement of compensation paid following a' denial of supersedeas where it is ultimately determined that compensation was not, in fact, payable). . As the County accurately observed in its supersedeas request before the Commonwealth Court, however, the Section 443 Fund provides for reimbursement of compensation benefits only. See Universal AM-CAN, Ltd. v. WCAB (Minteer), 870 A.2d. 961 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, while the Bureau granted the .
holding that appellate court should reverse and remand issue of attorneys fees where damages are reduced on appeal in a manner that could affect the determination of reasonable and necessary attorneys fees holding that attorneys fees could not be reimbursed from the section 443 fund holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding liability could not be transferred to the fund where the certificate of insurance was not signed holding that attorneys fee award in a common fund case must be  reasonable under the circumstances