to favor veterans over nonveterans in the hiring process. These CMS procedures require that the employing agency interview and consider veterans of a given category before nonveterans of the same category; that the employing agency request CMS approval before selecting a nonveteran over available veterans; and that veterans, upon request, receive a written explanation of the reasons why another candidate was selected. The Commission argues that these procedures satisfy section 8b.7(f) in that they reflect a reasonable interpretation of the veteran’s preference provision. The appellate court held that CMS’s failure to record these procedures in the administrative code renders them invalid. See 5 ILCS 100/1 — 70 (West 1992); Senn Park Nursing Center v. Miller, 104 Ill. 2d 169,181 (1984) (<HOLDING>). Our interpretation of section 8b.7(f),
holding that pro se litigants must follow the kentucky rules of civil procedure holding that an ineffective grievance procedure bars employers defense based on that procedure holding that judicial review of final agency action under the administrative procedure act  provides the proper procedure to challenge the sufficiency of an eis holding that when the administrative procedure is not empowered to achieve the end sought in the legal action the procedure is unavailable because it cannot accomplish the purpose of the legal action holding that when an agency fails to follow the proper procedure under the illinois administrative procedure act for the adoption of rules the rule is invalid