Commentary to the Guidelines for that section. This provision’s Application Note states that § 2K2.1(b)(5) applies to a defendant who (1) “disposed of two or more firearms to another individual,” and (2) “knew or had reason to believe that such conduct would result in the ... disposal of a firearm to an individual — (I) whose possession or receipt of the firearm would be unlawful; or (II) who intended to use or dispose of the firearm unlawfully.” U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1 cmt. n. 13. The district court is required to find the facts supporting this provision by a preponderance of the evidence. United States v. Goodman, 519 F.3d 310, 321 (6th Cir.2008) (explaining that for a prior version of § 2K2.1(b)(5) to apply to the use or possession of a firearm in connection with a 407-08 (4th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>), cited favorably by United States v. Cobb, 250
holding that the defendant was entitled to a new trial where the only witnesses to a drug transaction other than the defendant were an fbi agent and a cl recognizing firearms as common tools of the drug trade holding that the government had established that the presence of weapons was reasonably foreseeable to the defendant during his drug dealing where officers discovered handguns in residence where defendant kept cocaine base and drug paraphernalia holding that  2k21b5 applied where the defendant had reason to believe that the firearms were sold to drug abusers and to violent drug dealers whom the defendant feared holding that a city which brought an action for forfeiture of firearms recovered from a drug suspects residence was collaterally estopped from introducing evidence of drug possession thus it could not prove the firearms were used in drug transactions and could not forfeit them