on potential traffic citations. Because the Fourth Amendment establishes “[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons ... against unreasonable searches and seizures,” however, the wrong that the Fourth Amendment is designed to prevent is completed when a motorcyclist is cited without probable cause. See United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 354, 94 S.Ct. 613, 623, 38 L.Ed.2d 561 (1974) (“The purpose of the Fourth Amendment is to prevent unreasonable governmental intrusions into the privacy of one’s person, house, papers, or effects. The wrong condemned is the unjustified governmental invasion of these areas of an individual’s life. That wrong ... is fully accomplished by the original search without probable cause.”); Covino v. Patrissi, 967 F.2d 73, 77 (2d Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>); Cerro Metal Prods. v. Marshall, 620 F.2d 964,
recognizing that irreparable harm is the single most important prerequisite for the issuance of a preliminary injunction holding that the movant had to establish both of the first two factors ie likelihood of success and irreparable harm to receive a preliminary injunction holding right to be fundamental holding that even though irreparable harm is not required it had been shown and weighed in favor of issuance of the preliminary injunction holding that given the fundamental right involved namely the right to be free from unreasonable searches the plaintiff had sufficiently shown likelihood of irreparable harm for preliminary injunction purposes