Thus, New Jersey not only permits, but also encourages the bringing of private class actions . 464, 541 A.2d 1063, (1988) (involving the sale of a power boat with a defective engine, but in which the court held that plaintiff had failed to prove an unconscionable commercial practice had been utilized by defendant in making the sale); Varacallo v. Mass. Mut. Life Ins. Co., supra., 332 N.J.Super. at 40-45, 752 A.2d 807, (involving class action certification on behalf, of purchasers of “vanishing premium” whole life insurance policies which plaintiffs contended defendant sold by withholding material information as to its dividend rates which plaintiffs contended defendant had knowingly and intentionally inflated). Sheer v. EMK Motors Inc., 187 N.J.Super. 465, 455 A.2d 508 (App.Div.1982) (<HOLDING>). For cases allowing recovery of statutory
recognizing that the njcfa is directed primarily at deception misrepresentation and unconscionable practices engaged in by professional sellers seeking mass distribution of many types of consumer goods holding that defendant had engaged in deceptive practices in violation of the njcfa by violating the new jersey administrative code holding that statutory damages were appropriate for each discrete violation of that states deceptive trade practices act recognizing that pennsylvania had no interest in denying its residents the greater damages available under new jersey consumer fraud statutes for claims against a new jersey seller recognizing israel had no interest in denying its citizens the substantive advantages of new jersey defamation law in new jersey residents claims for defamation published in new jersey