does not compel a court to find that the persecution threshold has been met.” Altangerel v. Holder, 366 Fed.Appx. 574, 579 (6th Cir.2010) (citation omitted). See also Traore v. Holder, 358 Fed.Appx. 677, 679-80 (6th Cir.2009) (“[W]e have consistently recognized that while even a single beating offends one’s sense of civilized governmen tal conduct, a single beating does not compel a finding of persecution”) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s conclusion that Lian failed to show that it is more likely than not that he would suffer future persecution should he return to China. His single encounter with the police that occurred more than ten years ago certainly does not compel such a finding. See Traore, 358 Fed.Appx. at 680 (<HOLDING>). Lian produced no evidence that the Chinese
holding that harassment threats and one beating did not constitute persecution holding that evidence of kidnapping at gunpoint interrogation and beating did not compel finding of persecution holding that single beating at the hands of the government occurring seven years before did not establish probability of future persecution holding that a minor beating even in conjunction with threats did not compel a finding of persecution holding that the asylum standard for past persecution or wellfounded fear of future persecution is lower than the clear probability standard to show eligibility for withholding of removal