can file another Motion to Modify. The trial court has broad discretion in finding what is in the best interest of the child and has the authority to monitor the situation and modify the visitation order if necessary. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion, and we overrule issue two. ⅛. The Constitutional Right of a Mother to Raise her Son In issue three, Mother suggests the trial court’s order violates the constitutional right of a mother to raise her son. Mother relies on the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution to argue that a mother has the right to raise her child. But, Mother was not denied due process of law or the equal protection of the laws. See In re H.D.O., 580 S.W.2d 421, 424 (Tex.Civ.App.—Eastland 1979, no writ) (<HOLDING>). Mother also relies on Troxel v. Granville,
holding the best interest of the child standard does not violate federal constitutional principles holding that when information which potentially undermines the best interest of the child as well as the interest sought to be protected by the legitimation statutes and the policy of this state it must first be tested in light of the best interest of the child standard holding that  best interest of the child standard should be used in deciding whether to grant a paternity petition holding that the best interest of the child standard should be used in deciding whether to grant a paternity petition holding that the best interest of the child was the proper standard to apply in determining whether blood tests should be conducted