at 394, 109 S.Ct. 1865; Post v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 7 F.3d 1552, 1559 (11th Cir.1993). Another key factor in the Eleventh Circuit is the ext nable for Defendant Inabinett to keep her on the ground for ten minutes. Plaintiff admits that several of her neighbors and relatives approached the accident scene. 368 (M.D.Ala.1996) (finding no excessive force because Plaintiff did not claim that any physical injury resulted and did not present any other evidence to indicate the severity of the force used against him). The only injury that she claims is difficulty in breathing. However, the court finds that shortness of breath, standing alone, is not enough to establish a genuine issue of material fact concerning excessive force. See Cottrell v. Caldwell, 85 F.3d 1480, 1492 (11th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Based on the circumstances and lack of
holding that ordering police officers to use excessive force in bringing a lawyer into court was a judicial act recognizing the necessity of analyzing officer coys use of force against phelps in segments where coy arrested phelps placed him in handcuffs took him to the police station for booking and then beat him after he raised his leg in a manner that coy perceived to be a threat to another police officer holding that the plaintiff who was undisputedly not resisting arrest was dragged to the front of the police car slammed against the hood of the vehicle and forcibly handcuffed  and placed in very tight handcuffs even though they were quickly adjusted raised an issue of fact for the jury whether the force used against him was excessive holding that an officer intentionally hitting the plaintiffs head into the top of the police car as the plaintiff was being placed in the police car could be excessive force holding that officers who put decedent in handcuffs and leg restraints and placed him in a police car with his head between the front and rear seats in such a manner that decedent was unable to adequately breath did not use excessive force under the circumstances