the agreement without analysis. There seems to be no question that AHCA cannot recoup its Medicaid lien from settlement proceeds allocable to non-medical expense damages. We struggle to determine whether AHCA may satisfy its lien from funds allocated to future medical expenses. We noted earlier that AHCA and Mr. Willoughby stipulated that his future medical expenses will likely exceed $5 million. If Mr. Willoughby’s forty percent recovery versus total case value is applied to the total stipulated for all medical expenses, $5,148,000, the result yields over $2 million, more than enough to satisfy the entire lien. Yet, previous decisions from our sister districts suggested that the lien could be satisfied only from funds allocable to past medical expenses. Cf. Davis, 130 So.3d at 270 (<HOLDING>). Recently, however, in Giraldo, the First
holding that an employer is only allowed to be reimbursed from a tort recovery to the extent that the recovery duplicates the elements of damage covered by compensation benefits holding that recovery is limited to the portion of the medicaid recipients thirdparty recovery representing compensation for past medical expenses holding that the avoidance powers provide for recovery only if the recovery is for the benefit of the estate holding that recovery for medical expenses incurred as result of accident depends on proof of necessity and reasonableness holding that recovery is limited to actual compensatory damages