with customers responding to its Yellow Pages ads. Indeed, given the importance of customer referrals in the moving business, the harm would be ongoing — that is, customers that Mayflower loses today will be unable to refer customers to Mayflower in the future. See Duct-O-Wire Co. v. U.S. Crane, Inc., 31 F.3d 506, 509 (7th Cir.1994) (loss of present and future sales and customers constitutes irreparable harm); Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. Salvano, 999 F.2d 211, 215 (7th Cir.1993) (evidence of possible loss of customers if injunction is not issued sufficiently supports district court’s finding of irreparable harm and the inadequacy of the movant’s legal remedy); see also Gateway Eastern Railway Co. v. Terminal Railroad Assoc. of St. Louis, 35 F.3d 1134, 1140 (7th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). Thus, because such losses are difficult to
holding that the loss of money from a bank account does not constitute irreparable harm because that loss can be compensat ed by money damages holding that loss of customers and resulting injury to goodwill can constitute irreparable harm that is not compensable by an award of money damages holding that the potential loss of valuable business may constitute irreparable harm holding that monetary damages do not generally constitute irreparable harm holding that evidence of threatened loss of prospective customers or goodwill supports a finding of irreparable harm