which has a four year statute of limitations. See 810 ILCS 5/2-725(1) (Smith-Hurd 1992). To determine if the UCC applies, I must ask whether the contract “was predominantly one for the sale of goods with services incidentally involved, or was one for the rendition of services with the sale of goods incidentally involved.” Republic Steel Corp. v. Penn. Engineering Corp., 785 F.2d 174, 181 (7th Cir.1986) (applying Illinois law). Tyr-Ree entered the contract to obtain tire pyrolysis and shredding equipment which Shred Pax was to manufacture. The services Shred Pax agreed to perform, including installation, testing, and storage, were all important elements of the contract, but the Purchase Order was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods. See Republic Steel Corp., 785 F.2d 174 (<HOLDING>); Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. v. Brookhaven
holding that a contract for the design construction and installation of a water tank was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods under the ucc holding that a contract for the design manufacture and installation of two furnaces was predominantly a contract for the sale of goods and therefore subject to the uccs fouryear statute of limitations holding that the validity of a contract for a commission for the sale of real estate is determined by the law of the state where the contract is made holding that the measure of damages for the breach of a contract of sale where no fraud is shown is the difference between the contract price and the market price of the goods on the date of the breach holding that an attorney approval clause in a contract for the sale of real estate was a part of that contract and would have to be satisfied for the underlying contract to be enforceable