the only entity with the authority to invoke the Act and has not challenged the assignment in this case. See Delmarva Power & Light Co. v. United States, 79 Fed.Cl. 205 (2007). Furthermore, the only claim for which this Court has awarded damages is Meritor’s derivative breach of contract claim, a claim which is currently owned by the FDIC. Consequently, the Government asserts that the Plaintiff-Intervenor’s claims have not been assigned, and the Court agrees that the Act does not bar the current shareholders from lawfully receiving the distribution of the award. Alternatively, the Plaintiff-Intervenor asserts that § 1821(d)(ll) allows only the owner at the time of the seizure to assert a takings claim. See United States v. Dow, 357 U.S. 17, 20-21, 78 S.Ct. 1039, 2 L.Ed.2d 1109 (1958) (<HOLDING>); Maniere v. United States, 31 Fed.Cl. 410,
holding that a cause of action for damages to property resulting from a permanent nuisance accrues to the owner of the land at the time the injury begins to affect the land and mere transfer of the land by deed does not transfer the claim for damages holding that evidence was insufficient to prove constructive possession where the defendant was in jail at the time the drugs were seized from his residence holding that subsequent property owners were bound by prior owners agreement to restrict building density and preserve certain portions of land as a condition of the original zoning approval holding that the owners at the time the land was seized are owed compensation rather than the subsequent purchasers holding that appellate courts analyze plain error by reference to the law as of the time the appeal is decided rather than the extant law at the time of the disputed trial court ruling