acts void ab initio, and the cases lend support to the Bankruptcy Court’s holding. Having considered the available authority, the Court concludes that the Mississippi legislature intended to protect LLCs from the unauthorized acts of their members. It did so by passing section 79-29-303(2)(a) and then reemphasizing the point in 79-29-303(4). Earwood had no authority to bind Kinwood, and the conveyance was void ab initio. The Court therefore affirms the Bankruptcy Court’s holding. BankPlus alternatively urges the Court to impose an equitable lien on the property in the amount of the unpaid Northlake promissory notes. BankPlus failed to raise this issue before the Bankruptcy Court and therefore waived the argument. See In re OCA, Inc., 552 F.3d 413, 424 (5th Cir.2008) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>); Matter of Fairchild Aircraft Corp., 6 F.3d
holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be asserted for the first time on appeal holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that issues not properly presented to the bankruptcy court  cannot be raised  for the first time on appeal holding that claims which were not presented to the motion court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal