omitted); see also Ryan v. Gold Cross Servs., Inc., 903 P.2d 423, 426 (Utah 1995) ("The test we apply in determining compliance with the uniform operation of laws provision is whether the classification is reasonable, whether the objectives of the legislative action are legitimate, and whether there is a reasonable relationship between the classification and the legislative purposes." (internal quotation marks omitted)). 46 . Vance v. Bradley, 440 U.S. 93, 108, 99 S.Ct. 939, 59 L.Ed.2d 171 (1979) (internal quotation marks omitted). 47 . Even if the rule did create a classification based upon disability, it is not clear that such a classification would require heightened scrutiny. See City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 446, 105 S.Ct. 3249, 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985) (<HOLDING>). 48 . See supra ¶ 13; see also In re Stormont,
recognizing that strict scrutiny applies to facial discrimination against a suspect class holding that some form of heightened constitutional scrutiny applies holding that strict scrutiny applies holding that disability is not a suspect or quasisuspect classification that requires heightened scrutiny holding the eighth amendment requires that sentencing procedures in capital cases be evaluated under a heightened standard of reliability