CURIAM: We VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254 (2008) (<HOLDING>). * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has
holding that the intent to discriminate under batson is a pure issue of fact subject to review under a deferential standard holding that a trial courts judgment must comply with the statutory requirement that the judgment contain written findings of fact and conclusions of law holding that the standard of review for an award of statutory damages is even more deferential than an abuse of discretion standard holding that regardless of the parties agreement to the contrary district courts must review an arbitrators findings of fact and conclusions of law under the highly deferential standard set forth in 9 usc  10a holding that judicial scrutiny of attorney performance must be highly deferential