a picture of a rogue witness, completely out of control, acting alone, throwing away tapes and manipulating evidence with callous indifference. Many conversations between Whitacre and one or more conspirators that should have been recorded were not, and the FBI frequently did not file the necessary reports or provide explanations for these missed conversations. Many of the tapes Whitacre made were not collected as promptly as they should have been, and the catalogue of tapes given to and collected from Whitacre was not meticulously maintained. The FBI did not seem to follow its own internal guidelines on supervising taping activities, but this does not provide a basis for constitutional challenge. See United States v. Caceres, 440 U.S. 741, 752, 99 S.Ct. 1465, 59 L.Ed.2d 733 (1979) (<HOLDING>). Still, these technical deficiencies do not
holding that a breach of administrative guidelines does not establish a constitutional violation automatically holding immaterial breach did not constitute breach of contract holding party in breach could not maintain suit for breach of contract holding that violation of state law was not a per se constitutional violation holding that denial of a grievance by itself without any connection to the violation of constitutional rights alleged by plaintiff does not establish personal participation under  1983