1076-77. A procedural defect does not involve subject matter jurisdiction and may be waived if a party fails to object within 30 days after removal. Id. at 1077. There are two competing viewpoints on whether a failure to attach process to a notice of removal requires remand. Yellow Transp., Inc. v. Apex Digital, Inc., 406 F.Supp.2d 1213, 1215 (D.Kan.2005). “The predominant view is that the removing party’s failure to file the required state court papers is ‘curable in the federal courts if there is a motion to remand.’ ” Id. (quoting 14C Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3733 (3d ed. 1998)). The Fifth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits have generally followed this approach. See, e.g., Cook v. Randolph County, Ga., 573 F.3d 1143, 1150 (11th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); Riehl v. Nat’l Mut. Ins. Co., 374 F.2d 739,
holding that a violation of the forum defendant rule is a jurisdictional defect holding that any defect in removal procedure must be cured within the 30day removal period or it is fatal to the removal and defendants failure to attach exhibits to the notice of removal within that time required remand holding that failure to include all state court pleadings and process with the notice of removal is procedurally incorrect but is not a jurisdictional defect holding that the failure to join all the defendants in a removal petition is not a jurisdictional defect holding jurisdictional defect voids judgment when defect exposes such personal jurisdictional deficiencies as to violate due process