to a breach of her duties and obligations to the employer and demonstrat a single incident of absenteeism can constitute willful misconduct justifying denial of unemployment benefits. Tuff, 520 N.W.2d at 486 (“[e]ven a single unexcused absence may constitute misconduct ” (citing Del Dee Foods, Inc. v. Miller, 390 N.W.2d 415, 418 (Minn.Ct.App.1986)); Blau v. Masters Restaurant Assocs., Inc., 345 N.W.2d 791, 794 (Minn.Ct.App.1984)); Gunderson v. Libbey Glass, 412 So.2d 656, 658-59 (La.Ct.App.1982) (“Absence from work without sufficient reason, particularly in the face of warnings by the employer, may amount to willful misconduct so as to preclude an employee discharged therefor from obtaining unemployment benefits.”); DiGeronimo v. Ross, 53 A.D.2d 797, 385 N.Y.S.2d 172, 173 (1976) (<HOLDING>). We agree with the UID that Hardin, after
holding that employer did not have duty to protect allegedly intoxicated employee from risk that employee would have automobile accident after leaving work holding that leaving work early without permission after having been previously warned constitutes misconduct holding that single incident of leaving work early without receiving permission from supervisor to address problem of impending termination of electrical service to his home by employee on probation due to poor attendance record constituted willful misconduct related to work justifying denial of unemployment insurance benefits holding that sjection 241a5  bars aliens who have illegally reentered the united states after having previously been deported from applying for relief holding that single incident of failing to return to work after doctors visit without permission due to employees professed anxiety after being informed she may have skin cancer constituted willful misconduct related to work justifying denial of unemployment insurance benefits