they are usually related to the purpose of the stop and further valid governmental law enforcement interests. See id., 264 F.3d at 1221. The answer may give context to the motorist’s behavior that necessitated the stop in the first place. A motorist’s long trip may be the reason why he or she is tired and explain why he or she swerved across the center-line, or a particular urgency may explain speeding. See id. {29} Second, questions about travel plans are usually reasonable under the Fourth Amendment because the intrusion to the public is normally minimal. Id. Because these questions are asked while the officer is completing the tasks related to the traffic violation, they should result in a minimal delay to the motorist. See United States v. Wood, 106 F.3d 942, 945 (10th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). {30} The Tenth Circuit’s case-by-case
holding that questions about travel plans were permissible because they were completed within the time necessary to run the warrants check holding that defendant was not free to leave when officer directed defendant to stay while he conducted a warrants check holding that apprendi was not triggered because the defendants were sentenced to terms of imprisonment that were within the maximum penalties for the rico offenses that they were found guilty of committing holding seizure occurred when police officer retained drivers license while making radio warrants check holding that officers may question motorists about their license registration and travel plans