Fourth Amendment. Brown v. Lyford, 243 F.3d 185, 189 (5th Cir.2001) (citations omitted). In a suit brought against a municipal official in his official capacity, the plaintiff must show that the municipality has a policy or custom that caused his injury. Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-66, 105 S.Ct. 3099, 87 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985); Monell v. N.Y. City Dept. of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 689, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1979). If a municipal officer who has authority to establish final municipal policy makes a decision or orders a course of action, the municipality may be held liable for the officer’s decision or order. Pembaur v. City of Cincinnati, 475 U.S. 469, 480-82, 106 S.Ct. 1292, 89 L.Ed.2d 452 (1986); see also Tuner v. Upton County, Texas, 915 F.2d 133, 136 (5th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). In this case, Sheriff Shumate does not argue
holding that a municipality may be held liable as a person under  1983 holding that a municipality may only be held liable under  1983 for a policy practice or custom holding that the municipality may be held liable for the illegal or unconstitutional actions of its final policymakers as they engage in the setting of goals and the determination of how those goals will be achieved holding that municipality may not be held liable under  1983 upon theory of respondeat superior recognizing that a municipality may be liable under  1983 if the final policymaker takes the unconstitutional action or when a widespread practice exists