or “injured” to bring suit. See id. at 121 (citing Connecticut v. Physicians Health Services of Connecticut, Inc., 103 F.Supp.2d 495, 509-10 (D.Conn.2000) (citing federal statutes with broad enforcement provisions)). At issue here is whether Title VII’s standing provision evinces an intention on the part of Congress to allow states to sue in their parens patriae capacity. The standing provision, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, authorizes civil suits by a “person claiming to be aggrieved.” A related provision defines the word “person” to include “governments,” “government agencies,” and “political subdivisions.” 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(a). When read together, these provisions clearly authorize the State of New York, as a “government,” to bring suit under Title VII. W 5 (D.C.Cir.1976) (<HOLDING>); Hackett v. McGuire Bros., Inc., 445 F.2d 442,
holding that a prima facie case of discrimination is not established merely by the number of peremptory strikes against blacks in cases where the percentage of blacks on the empaneled jury is higher than the percentage of the venire pool holding that white female had standing under title vii to challenge her employees alleged racial discrimination against blacks holding that blacks who were not subjected to racial discrimination had standing under title vii to sue over discrimination against other blacks holding that title vii proscribes racial discrimination against whites upon the same standards as racial discrimination against nonwhites holding that title vii precludes a claim under section 1981 for racial discrimination against a federal employee