to the instant case, the limitations period would be tolled during the pendency of the motion for ifp, but would recommence ticking — at the earliest — on July 28,1998, the date of expiration of the 10-day leave granted in Judge Poliak’s order. Given that 53 days had already passed when the plaintiff filed the complaint and motion for ifp on March 24, 1998, this means that 37 of the 90 days would remain on July 28, 1998. Thus, the plaintiff would be required to pay the filing fee and commence the action by September 4, 1998. However, the fee was not paid until February 9, 2000, approximately 17 months after the expiration of the 90-day period. Without determining what is the outer limit of a “reasonable time,” the Court finds that ■ 17 months exceeds it. Cf. Jarrett, 22 F.3d at 259 (<HOLDING>); Williams-Guice, 45 F.3d at 165 (holding that
holding that a six month delay was unreasonable holding that a 14 month delay was unreasonable holding that a one month delay is acceptable holding that a five month delay is unreasonable holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable