events concerns Gerry Bellflower. The Government contends that because McCray was huddled with Bellflower, an alleged loiterer and suspected narcotics dealer, it was reasonable to conclude that he was engaged in a drug transaction. As an initial matter, the Government has failed to establish that McCray and Wallace were actually conversing with Bellflower at all that evening. The officers claim they saw Bellflower, a suspicious character, crossing the street, so they went around the block and then saw him talking to Wallace and McCray. As the officers’ testimony indicated, the lighting was very dim that evening. In addition, there is a discrepancy in Officers Prado’s and Muniz’s testimony as to what was going on between Bellflower, Wallace, and McCray. The officers weren’t s Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Anderson, 754 F.Supp. 442,
holding that information of criminal activity given by a known reliable informant is enough to sustain a terry stop holding that reasonable suspicion justified a terry stop of the defendant when she was walking and talking with known drug dealers who were known to be at the scene to buy and sell cocaine holding that an unverified tip from a known informant was sufficiently reliable to justify a terry stop and frisk holding that a group of men standing with known drug traffickers who fled when officers approached established reasonable suspicion holding that tip from known reliable informant that was immediately verifiable at the scene could form basis for reasonable suspicion and forcible terry stop