10-11 and accompanying text, with Gant, 129 S.Ct. at 1723 (“Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant’s arrest only if the arrestee is within reaching distance of the passenger compartment at the time of the search or it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest.” (emphasis added)). 30 . See, e.g., United States v. Wilson, 355 F.3d 358, 362 (5th Cir.2003) (citing Fed.R.Crim.P. 52(b)). 31 . Fed.R.Crim.P. 43(a)(2). 32 . United States v. Gagnon, 470 U.S. 522, 526, 105 S.Ct. 1482, 84 L.Ed.2d 486 (1985) (quoting Snyder v. Massachusetts, 291 U.S. 97, 108, 54 S.Ct. 330, 78 L.Ed. 674 (1934)). 33 . United States v. Washington, 705 F.2d 489, 497 (D.C.Cir.1983) (per curiam). 34 . See United States v. Alikpo, 944 F.2d 206, 207 (5th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); see also Washington, 705 F.2d at 497 ("[T]he
holding no error was committed when trial court held defense counsel in contempt in front of the jury though it would have been the better practice to reprimand counsel and impose the fine in the absence of the jury holding that it is error to conduct most of the jury selection process in the absence of the defendant holding that the failure to object to a defect in the arbitrator selection process constituted a waiver holding a material departure from statute governing jury selection is one that affects the substantial rights of a defendant in securing an impartial jury holding that sentencing error is harmless if the error did not affect the district courts selection of the sentence imposed