hospitals the arbitrary power to veto the performance of abortions for any reason or no reason at all. The state cannot grant hospitals power it does not have itself.” Id. at 1158-59. In Birth Control Centers, Inc. v. Reizen, 508 F.Supp. 1366 (E.D.Mich.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part on other grounds, 743 F.2d 352 (6th Cir.1984), a district court in Michigan invalidated a regulation similar to the North Carolina licensing scheme at issue in Hallmark Clinic. There, Michigan had promulgated a regulation requiring abortion providers to obtain transfer agreements with local hospitals before they could obtain a license. Id. at 1369. Relying on the Hallmark Clinic decision, the court struck down the Michigan regulation as an impermissible delegation of state power. See id. at 1374 (<HOLDING>); see also GE Co. v. N.Y. State Dep’t of Labor,
holding that a prisoner is entitled to due process prior to being transferred to a mental hospital holding that plaintiffs due process rights were violated when state licensing officials misapplied state licensing law in order to keep plaintiffs from competing in business against one official holding that hospital privilege requirements violate due process concepts because they delegate a licensing function to private entities without standards to guide their discretion holding informal process is sufficient because medicaid providers are not entitled  under constitutional due process standards to a full administrative hearing prior to termination of their provider agreement holding that doctrine does not violate due process