830 P.2d 216, 218 (Utah 1991)). 119 A sufficient affidavit may be used to promote efficiency during a plea colloquy. See Gibbons, 740 P.2d at 1313. However, "an affidavit should be only the starting point, not an end point, in the pleading process." Id. "It is critical ... that strict [rJule 11 compliance be demonstrated on the record at the time the guilty or no contest plea is entered." State v. Smith, 812 P.2d 470, 477 (Utah Ct.App.1991). "Therefore, if an affidavit is used to aid [rlule 11 compliance, it must be addressed during the plea hearing." Id. "The trial court must conduct an inquiry to establish that the defendant understands the affidavit and voluntarily signed it." Id.; see also State v. Maguire, 830 P.2d 216, 217, 1992 Utah LEXIS 29, No. 900555, *2-3 (Utah 1992) (<HOLDING>). Then, "[aloy omissions or ambiguities in the
holding that in determining whether the defendant has a prior conviction for burglary under the armed career criminal act the federal court may look only to the terms of the charging document the terms of a plea agreement or transcript of colloquy between judge and defendant in which the factual basis for the plea was confirmed by the defendant or to some comparable judicial record of this information holding that a signed plea form without a colloquy to establish that defendant read and understood the contents of the form was insufficient to conclusively refute defendants claim that he was not advised regarding the sentence to be imposed recognizing that plea colloquy demonstrated that the defendant understood his rights and voluntarily relinquished them holding that a courts inquiry as to disputed facts in connection with a prior conviction is limited to the terms of the charging document a plea agreement a transcript of the plea colloquy or a comparable judicial record holding a plea affidavit is properly incorporated in the record when the trial judge ascertains in the plea colloquy that the defendant has read has understood and acknowledges all the information contained therein