the need to ensure that “every man’s vote should equal another’s,” and the problems created by the use of large, demographically unequal counties as building blocks. Ibid. Against that backdrop, and in recognition of that concern, we hypothesized that the municipality provision in the Constitution “may” have to be breached at some later date. Ibid. But the one-man one-vote question is not implicated here, for there is no allegation that the division of Newark and Jersey City into only two districts each would result in impermissible population 330 (1993) (observing that “unnecessary fragmentation of [municipalities] limits the ability of local constituencies to organize effectively and increases voter confusion and isolation”); Carstens v. Lamm, 543 F.Supp. 68, 82 (D.Colo.1982) (<HOLDING>); J. Gerald Herbert, Redistricting in the
recognizing that a redistricting plan can be driven at least to some extent by partisan interests recognizing culpability as important criteria for eighth amendment excessive fines claim holding that redistricting plan violated state constitutional mandate and thus affirming trial courts findings that 1 recognizing frequent use of respect for municipal boundaries as criteria in evaluating redistricting plan holding that a statutory mandate to set criteria for waste plan certification says nothing to suggest that the criteria must be detailed or quantitative