justice court and county court at law lacked jurisdiction over the dispute. Id. at 734-35. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction and dissolved the writ of possession. Id. at 735. Here, Grantham conceded that she did not have a landlord-tenant relationship with Goodman-Delaney. Goodman-Delaney entered the property legally when she moved in with her husband who undisput-edly had legal possession of the property. Grantham alleges she obtained title to the property in part through inheritance and in part by deed from her siblings. Accordingly, the justice court had to determine whether Grantham had title to the property before it could determine whether Grantham had a superior right to possess the property over Goodman-Delaney. See Geldard, 214 S.W.3d at 209 (<HOLDING>). The justice court, and the county court at
holding that trial court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate action for malicious prosecution when matter before it was limited to motion for sanctions holding justice court did not have jurisdiction to adjudicate merits of title because it was required to analyze conveyance of property against claim of homestead right holding that the general homestead exemption may not be invoked to defeat claims against the holder for taxes and assessments against the homestead property holding that homestead exemption was unavailable even though claimants were  living on the land and claiming it as homestead with the permission or acquiescence of the owner for they could have no homestead right or interest in land to which they had no title holding that a spouse was bound by a conveyance of community property to which she was not a party because of her knowledge and acquiescence to the conveyance