that he attached to his January 2014 application to correct his military records, which states that: During my EifS physical the physician diagnosed me with depression. He also noted that I was never referred for further evaluations for my epilepsy and shoulder as I should have been. He documented that I “could not” do push ups (but I was never given a profile (P3)) and I cannot do overhead work. AR at 210 (emphasis existing); see also AR at 462 (same document included with plaintiffs January 27, 2014, application for correction of military record). But, neither of these documents demonstrates that plaintiff raised his shoulder injury as a ground for unfitness. And so, plaintiff has waived any claim related to his shoulder injury. See Parks v. United States, 127 Fed.Cl. 677, 680 (2016) (<HOLDING>). The aforementioned documents similarly fail
holding that plaintiff waived claims that he failed to raise in petition before the relevant military correction board holding that plaintiffs failure to raise his constitutional claims in the military court system bars him from raising them in federal court holding that by fading to timely raise the issue before the trial court the defendant had waived the right to raise the issue on appeal that the trial court failed to consider less severe sanctions holding that plaintiff waived his argument of ineffective counsel in front of the united states court of federal claims because he failed to raise the issue in the first instance with the air force board for the correction of military records holding the plaintiff failed to make a prima facie case that the defendants failure to promote him was discriminatory where the plaintiff failed to that show he was qualified for the relevant position