in § 7B-2203(b). These alleged errors were not, however, set out in the superior court’s order as its basis for the superior court’s determination that the district court abused its discretion. Because the juvenile did not cross-assign error to the superior court’s failure to address those concerns, these arguments cannot be a basis for upholding the superior court’s decision. See N.C.R. App. P. 10(d) (“Without taking an appeal an appellee may cross-assign as error any action or omission of the trial court which was properly preserved for appellate review and which deprived the appellee of an alternative basis in law for supporting the judgment, order, or other determination from which appeal has been taken.”); Harllee v. Harllee, 151 N.C. App. 40, 51, 565 S.E.2d 678, 685 (2002) (<HOLDING>). In sum, we hold that the trial court applied
holding an issue not raised to the family court is not preserved for appellate review holding that alternative basis for upholding decision below is not properly preserved for appellate review in absence of crossassignment of error holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review holding that a constitutional challenge to a statute is not properly preserved for appellate review if as here it is not presented to the trial court and is raised for the first time on appeal holding that an issue not properly preserved below in the district court is generally waived