determined the amount it would allow such a creditor to reach are besides the point. 6 .Both the trustee and the bankruptcy court proceeded on the assumption that the Trust interest was acquired "by bequest, devise or inheritance” and therefore embraced by section 541(a)(5)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code. Under that provision, income payments from a trust (including a spendthrift trust) which the beneficiary is entitled to receive within 180 days after the filing of the bankruptcy are brought into the bankruptcy estate. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(5)(A); Matter of Moody, 837 F.2d 719, 723 (5th Cir.1988). However, as Neuton correctly points out, and as the BAP agreed, the Fannie Borun Trust was an intervivos trust, unaffected by § 541(a)(5)(A). See Newman v. Magill, 99 B.R. 881, 884-85 (C.D.Ill.1989) (<HOLDING>). 7 . For analogous, prospective constructions
holding that income payment debtor received from spendthrift trusts or was entitled to receive by terms of the trusts within 180 days of filing of debtors bankruptcy petition constituted bequests and became property of debt ors estate under  541a5a holding county does not fit statutory definition of victim under restitution statutes holding that distributions from an inter vivos trust do not qualify as bequests and  541a5a does not operate to bring such distributions into the bankruptcy estate holding that defendants met the test for individual liability under  3713 and were personally liable for distributions made from decedents estate and trust holding that income distributions derived from an intervivos trust do not fit within the definition of  541a5a and therefore escape the pale of the 180 day dragnet