one of the Firm’s clients, the Judgment Creditor discovered that the client transferred money to the Firm. The Judgment Creditor subpoenaed the Firm requesting documents reflecting any payment of sums into and out of the Firm’s trust account for the benefit of its client. Following a hearing and in camera review of the subject wire receipts, the trial court granted the discovery request but redacted some banking information from the documents, such as the trust account number. The issue presented is whether the trust account wire receipts are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Because this financial information is not privileged in the hands of the client, it is not privileged in the hands of the attorney. Greenberg Traurig v. Bolton, 706 So.2d 97, 98-99 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (<HOLDING>); Goldberg v. Ross, 421 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA
holding that the debtors false statements about the location of assets of the estate were material to the proceedings holding that a public accountant was not liable to creditors and investors who relied upon a negligently prepared balance sheet reflecting the assets of a company holding the attorneyclient privilege does not extend to information reflecting a judgment debtors assets which is held by a law firm holding contingency fee cases commenced prior to dissolution are assets of the firm recognizing that the right does not extend to committing perjury