at 639, 107 S.Ct. at 3038. We begin our analysis with the first prong of the Harlow test and ask whether there was a clearly established right to familial integrity when HSD obtained temporary custody of the Oldfield children via an ex parte order. The right to familial integrity embodied in the Fourteenth Amendment, see Griffin v. Strong, 983 F.2d 1544, 1547 (10th Cir.1993), is a substantial right and one that has been clearly established by the Supreme Court in several cases. See Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U.S. 645, 652, 92 S.Ct. 1208, 1212, 31 L.Ed.2d 551 (1972) (unwed father has substantial interest in retaining custody of children born out of wedlock with whom he maintained strong parental relationship); May v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528, 533, 73 S.Ct. 840, 843, 97 L.Ed. 1221 (1953) (<HOLDING>); Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166,
holding that a parents right to the care custody companionship and management of his or her child is a fundamental right protected by the federal and state constitutions recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children recognizing in dictum parents right to care custody management and companionship of their children recognizing parents fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children