Globe Ins. Co., 30 Wash.App. 78, 631 P.2d 1021, 1022 (1981) ("It is recognized that the control which is the equivalent of use, so as to bring the person exercising control within the scope of the omnibus clause, may be exercised by giving signals to the actual operator of the vehicle.”); Blue Bird Body Co. Inc. v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 583 F.2d 717, 724 & n. 4 (5th Cir.1978); Western Casualty and Surety Co. v. Crawford, 635 F.2d 667, 670 (8th Cir.1980). 9 . See Va.Code § 38.2-2206. 10 . See, e.g., Slagle v. Hartford Ins. Co. of the Midwest, 267 Va. 629, 638, 594 S.E.2d 582, 587 (2004) (man directing a tractor-trailer backing out of a driveway was "using” the tractor-trailer for purposes of the UIM); Randall v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 255 Va. 62, 67-68, 496 S.E.2d 54, 57 (1998) (<HOLDING>); Edwards v. Government Employees Ins. Co., 256
holding warrantless search of vehicle was improper where car was not stopped on a highway but was parked at a residence with no occupants inside or near the vehicle and capable of being driven away by the turn of an ignition key holding that the officer acted within the scope of his authority in requiring the defendant stopped in middle lane of traffic to exit his vehicle holding that a hotel built adjacent to a highway owed a duty to exercise reasonable care for the safety of its invitees in passing over the highway to and from appellees hotel facilities holding that a highway worker was using his employers vehicle while placing lane closure signs along the side of a highway holding the department liable for the fall of a tree that stood on private property abutting a highway