failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We affirm the conviction and clarify that the outcome of this case is controlled by United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir.2010). I. In 1992 Mattix was convicted of first degree sodomy, first degree attempted rape, first degree sexual abuse, and first degree attempted sexual abuse. Because of these convictions, Mattix was required to register as a sex offender. In 2010, Mattix moved from Oregon to Nevada but failed to either update his Oregon registration or register in Nevada. He was arrested in September 2010 and charged with failing to register as a sex offender under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Section 2250(a) is part of the Sex ir.2009) (same), with United States v. Utesch, 596 F.3d 302 (6th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). . • In December -2010, we joined the Sixth
holding that claim that plea was involuntary because the court failed to comply with rule 3172c was cognizable in a rule 3850 motion holding that florida administrative code rule 285211 which purported to allow an agency or hearing officer to dismiss a proceeding or enter a default as a sanction for failure to comply with a procedural order was invalid holding that the february 28 2007 interim rule was invalid because it failed to comply with the administrative procedure act holding that a plan under chapter 13 although confirmed was invalid because it failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of 11 usc  1322a2 requiring full payment of all claims entitled to priority holding that such a general question regarding the prospective jurors willingness to follow the law did not comply with the 2007 amended version of rule 431b