a Terry stop and the attendant interruption of liberty required to accomplish it. Based on the totality of the circumstances of Washington's stop, including the absence of any officer-observed activity which would provide an independent basis for a traffic stop or otherwise generate reasonable suspicion and the absence of detailed predictions of Washington's future behavior or other indicia of reliability that would reflect the knowledge of the anonymous caller, we must reverse. Reversed. ROBB and MATHIAS, JJ., concur. 1 . Ind.Code § 35-48-4-1(2). 2 . Ind.Code § 35-48-4-10(a)(1). 3 . Oral argument was held at Delphi High School on October 3, 2000. We wish to thank the {faculty and students for their hospitality. 4 . See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 28, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 LEd.2d 889 (1968) (<HOLDING>). 5 . We note that some of our recent decisions
holding that certain police stops of limited duration that are reasonably related in scope to the justification for their initiation are legal holding that arguments that are not raised or that are not accompanied by factual and legal support are deemed waived holding that claims are related if they involve a common core of facts or they are based on related legal theories holding that provisions in a subcontract incorporating a prime contract for a limited purpose are limited only to those that are applicable holding that comparatively nonthreatening character of detentions associated with ordinary traffic stops explains the absence of any suggestion in our opinions that terry stops are subject to the dictates of miranda 