standing and was not a real party in interest because it temporarily transferred title to its servicing agent Alliance Mortgage. Fannie Mae has standing because it reserved “at all times” its ownership interest in the note. See Nat. Security Fire & Cas. Co. v. Eureka Fed. S & L Assn., 188 Ga. App. 693, 694 (1) (373 SE2d 811) (1988) (mortgagee, not its servicing agent, was real party in interest entitled to fire insurance proceeds); In re O’Dell, 268 B.R. 607, 617 (N.D. Ala. 2001) (noting “that it is possible for more than one party to be a real party in interest” based upon “an understanding of modern day financing by which creditors frequently carve up the bundle of rights associated with [a] claim”); Bankers Trust v. 236 Beltway Investment, 865 FSupp. 1186, 1191 (E.D. Va. 1994) (<HOLDING>). 2. Reginald McCray also contends that the
holding that employers have standing to sue holding that both owner of money due under mortgage and its loan servicer may have standing to sue for deficiencies holding plaintiff may sue federal agents for money damages for violation of his constitutional rights holding that an incidental beneficiary does not have standing to sue for breach of a contract holding that plaintiffs lacked standing to sue