exclusive jurisdiction to initially process such charges for a period of 60 days, for the purpose of allowing the EEOC to proceed immediately with the processing of such charges before the 61st day. In addition, the EEOC will initially process the following charges: &emdash; All Title VII charges received by the [ERD] 240 days or more after the date of violation. Hunt acknowledges that pursuant to this agreement, the ERD acted as an agent of the EEOC in accepting Johnson’s charge as jointly filed on April 3, 1996, and that his charge was thereby properly filed with the EEOC on that date. Hunt further admits that the ERD, through the works-haring agreement, could properly waive its 60-day exclusivity period set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e). That is pre F.3d 304, 308-311 (2d Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Under Commercial Office Products, that
holding that an agreement to submit age discrimination claims to arbitration does not constitute a waiver holding that a plea agreement with a waiver of direct appeal rights does not include a waiver of collateral remedies because the government could have included a waiver of collateral rights in the plea agreement and chose not to do so holding that waiver provision of illinois worksharing agreement was selfexecuting and worked instantaneous constructive termination of the states jurisdiction over the charge holding that a waiver of right to appeal contained in a plea agreement is enforceable holding that new yorks worksharing agreement contained a selfexecuting waiver of the states right to exclusively handle discrimination claims for 60 days and that the waiver constituted a termination under  2000e5c