Cong. & Admin.News 405, 407. Congress declared this practice to be a burden on interstate commerce, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c)(l) (1988), and decreed that sellers of perishable agricultural commodities were protected by a trust “until full payment of the sums owing in connection with such transactions has been received by such unpaid suppliers [or] sellers.... ” Id. § 499e(c)(2). The trust extends only to the “receivables or proceeds from the sale of such commodities and food or products,” and establishes “a Nonsegregated ‘floating Trust’ and, “commingling of trust assets is contemplated.” id.; 7 C.F.R. § 46.46(c) (describing trust assets), and proceeds from other sources are not within the trust’s rubric. See Six L’s Packing Co. v. West Des Moines State Bank, 967 F.2d 256, 258 (8th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>). PACA’s trust provision has the precise effect
holding that a third party who receives trust property on inquiry notice that a trustee has misappropriated trust funds is also liable for breach of trust holding that where a paca claimant did not create a common trust the attorney fee award was inappropriate holding that a constructive trust had arisen on a third partys house due to her use of trust assets which had been diverted by the paca trustee to pay the mortgage and finding that the trust beneficiary plaintiffs are entitled to a lien on the property in the amount of the diverted funds holding that paca debtor may prove that certain funds are not proceeds from produce sales and hence not part of trust assets holding that failure to pay sales taxes is a breach of trust