that Su is unable to show a continuing loss to the estate. Since January 1, 2015, the Debtors have incurred only $28,716.00 in operational losses, all of which are due to a single Debtor. (ECF Nos. 2331 and 2356). All of the vessels have been sold and there are no current operations, meaning there is little risk of negative cash flow going forward. As discussed above, however, the Debtors have incurred $592,646.76 in professional fees from November 2014 to March 2015, although not all fees have been approved by the Court. (ECF No. 2458-1). Su has cited several cases holding that yet-to-be-approved fee applications may constitute a continuing loss for the purposes of § 1112(b)(4)(A). See, e.g., Morreóle V.2011-SIP-1 CRE/CADC Venture, LLC (In re Morreale), 533 B.R. 320, 324 (D.Colo.2015) (<HOLDING>); Gateway, 374 B.R. at 564 (finding that
holding that the court of appeals erred in modifying the judgment to include attorneys fees when the trial courts refusal to grant attorneys fees was not the subject of a point of error holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees holding that the accrual of attorneys fees alone is sufficient to establish cause holding the failure to establish identity alone is sufficient grounds to deny asylumrelated relief holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees