The term consisted of 136 months on the cocaine base convictions and 120 months on the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon conviction, to run concurrently with each other. The court also sentenced Edna Oliver to a consecutive 60 months term in prison on the § 924(c)(1) conviction, and an 8 year term of supervised release upon release from imprisonment. . On March 15,1996, Defendant Edna Oliver filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. She argues that her conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) for using and carrying firearms during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime should be vacated in light of the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Bailey v. United States, — U.S.-, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995) (<HOLDING>). In its response to Edna Oliver’s motion, the
holding that to enhance a sentence because of the defendants use of a firearm the jury must find the defendant guilty of a crime involving a firearm or otherwise specifically find that a firearm was used holding that the use prong of  924c1 requires the active employment of a firearm holding that no active facilitation of the principals use of the firearm is necessary for an aiding and abetting conviction under  924c holding that the evidence was insufficient to support the defendants convictions for using a firearm in violation of 18 usc  924c1 only because the word use properly construed did not embrace mere possession of a firearm but rather required active employment of a weapon holding that to apply the firearm enhancement the firearm need only reflect the context of the defendants possession and the defendants ability to use the firearm to promote the controlled substance offense