Thus, if the non-moving party fails to make a sufficient showing on an essential element of his or her case to which he or she has the burden of proof, the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). B. Whether Saul Ewing Has Standing To Enforce The Settlement Agreement Against Rottlund As a general matter, only a party to a contract has standing to enforce a contract and sue for breach of that contract. Verosol B.V. v. Hunter Douglas, Inc., 806 F.Supp. 582, 586 (E.D.Va.1992) (applying New Jersey law) (citing 2 Samuel Williston A Treatise on the Law of Contracts (“Williston on Contracts ”) § 347 (3d ed.1959)); Insituform of North America, Inc. v. Chandler, 534 A.2d 257, 270 (Del.Ch.1987) (<HOLDING>); Madison Realty Partners 7, LLc v. Ag ISA,
holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur holding that an attorney approval clause in a contract for the sale of real estate was a part of that contract and would have to be satisfied for the underlying contract to be enforceable holding that nonsignatories to a contract may be compelled to arbitrate when there is an obvious and close nexus between the nonsignatories and the contract or the con tracting parties holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract holding that nonsignatories to a contract have no rights under the contract and thus no standing to assert claims under the contract