Can take “the bulk of the factual material from a preexisting compilation without infringement.” Id. at 1445. The protection available for a compilation is “thin.” Feist, 499 U.S. at 349, 111 S.Ct. at 1289; see also BellSouth, 999 F.2d at 1439 (applying Feist and concluding that defendant did not appropriate “original elements” of BellSouth directory “as a whole” by preparing data base and sales leads based upon listing information and units of advertising appearing in preexisting directory). The focus is on “the selection, coordination, or arrangement of listings in the directory [which must be] sufficiently original or creative [that] the directory will be entitled to a copyright.” Key Publications, Inc. v. Chinatown Today Publ’g Enters., Inc., 945 F.2d 509, 513, 516 (2d Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). See also Feist, 499 U.S. at 345-47, 111 S.Ct.
holding that contributory trademark infringement requires some predicate act of infringement holding that a publishers selection of 260 different categories even if including particular categories that have been used in other directories involved sufficient creativity to contribute to the overall originality of a classified directory recognizing statutory nature of stay but concluding that court still has interest in ensuring compliance recognizing copyrightability of specialty directory but concluding no infringement by smaller competing publication that utilized significantly different principles of listing selection recognizing possible adverse action where reassignment left plaintiff with significantly different  and diminished  supervisory and programmatic responsibilities