offending the First Amendment. Id. at-, 113 S.Ct. at 2200-01. The statutes under which the defendants were prosecuted also target unprotected conduct — willful interference with housing rights, conspiracy, and the use of fire. So although § 3631 specifically prohibits intimidation based on race, because such intimidation itself is unprotected conduct, under Mitchell the statute is not facially invalid. 2. The Overbreadth and Vagueness Issue The three statutory provisions also survive First Amendment scrutiny under the vagueness and overbreadth doctrines. For the reasons stated in their opinions, we agree with the Eighth and Ninth Circuits which have already rejected vagueness and over-breadth challenges to §§ 241 and 3631. See United States v. McDermott, 29 F.3d 404, 410 (8th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); United States v. J.H.H., 22 F.3d 821, 828
holding the ordinance as applied to entertainers performing at a sexuallyoriented business is not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad holding that the prohibition against fighting in fla admin code r 33601314  24 was not unconstitutionally vague or overbroad holding  241 and 3631 not vague holding  241 not vague or overbroad holding  3631 not vague or overbroad