197 (Tex.1999) (orig. proceeding); Rosales v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co., 905 S.W.2d 745, 750 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1995, writ denied). Lighthouse asserts venue is proper under both Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code Section 15.002(a)(1) and Section 15.035(a). A. Standard of Review An appellate court reviews a trial court’s denial of a motion to transfer venue de novo. Wilson v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Dept., 886 S.W.2d 259, 260-62 (Tex.1994). We, therefore, conduct an independent review of the entire record. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 15.064(b) (Vernon 2002); Wilson, 886 S.W.2d at 260-62. If there is any probative evidence in the record demonstrating venue was proper in the county where judgment was rendered, we must uphold the trial court’s ruling. Rosales, 905 S.W.2d at 748 (<HOLDING>). B. Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code
holding that review of a partial and truncated record by the district court was error and case remanded for review on the entire administrative record holding that review consists of entire record including the trial on the merits to determine whether there is any probative evidence that venue was proper holding that in reviewing a jury instruction this court must review the entire instruction and look at all the evidence on the record to determine whether there was error and whether that error prejudiced the complaining party holding that the district courts review of a partial and truncated record was error and remanding the case for review on the entire administrative record holding that an appellate court may review the entire record to determine whether hearsay statements are sufficiently reliable