(1) whether agreement was reached on valuing the parties' personal property and, if not, the correct valuation and division of the property; (2) the classification of the debt on the Discover account (related to the date on which it was incurred); and (8) the value of the repairs necessary to bring the Caskill home up to code. MATTHEWS and EASTAUGH, Justices, not participating. 1 . Odom v. Odom, 141 P.3d 324, 330 (Alaska 2006). 2 . Id. 3 . Hatten v. Hatten, 917 P.2d 667, 672 n. 11 (Alaska 1996). 4 . Brandal v. Shangin, 36 P.3d 1188, 1191 (Alaska 2001). 5 . Id. at 1192. 6 . Hatten, 917 P.2d at 672. 7 . 794 P.2d 1346 (Alaska 1990). 8 . Id. at 1348. 9 . Id. 10 . Id. at 1349. 11 . Sampson v. Sampson, 14 P.3d 272, 276 (Alaska 2000). 12 . Abood v. Abood, 119 P.3d 980, 984 (Alaska 2005) (<HOLDING>). 13 . 794 P.2d 1346, 1349 (Alaska 1990)
holding that the law to be applied in determining the validity of  an outofstate marriage is the law of the state in which the marriage occurred recognizing that basis for deportation was aliens misrepresentation about his marriage not the validity of his marriage holding that presumption overcome where wife introduced evidence that intent in placing proceeds in joint account was for administrative convenience rather than to make donation to marriage holding husband could not have marriage annulled because wife was pregnant by him at time of marriage holding that because the wife failed to present any evidence as to the legal services performed in the trial court the wife was not entitled to a second hearing to establish attorneys fees