with the state court judgment. Feldman, 460 U.S. at 483 n. 16, 103 S.Ct. 1303. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies as long as the party had a reasonable opportunity to raise his federal claims in the state court proceedings. Wood v. Orange County, 715 F.2d 1543, 1547 (11th Cir.1983). Dale, 121 F.3d at 626. A federal suit is so intertwined with the earlier state court judgment “if the federal claim succeeds only to the extent that the state court wrongly decided the issues before it.” Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco, Inc., 481 U.S. 1, 25, 107 S.Ct. 1519, 95 L.Ed.2d 1 (1987) (Marshall, J., concurring). Datz v. Kilgore, 51 F.3d 252 (11th Cir.1995). The Rooker-Feldman doctrine also applies to bar federal review of state court convictions. See Jones v. Crosby, 137 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); Datz v. Kilgore, 51 F.3d 252 (11th Cir.1995).
holding that the state law of collateral estoppel applies in civil rights actions brought under 42 usc  1983 holding that person in 42 usc  1983 does not include states holding that a defendant cannot utilize 42 usc  1983 to recast his claim and thereby obtain collateral review in federal court of the state court decision denying his application for a stay holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983 holding that a state prisoner may not challenge the constitutionality of his conviction in a suit for damages under 42 usc  1983