[JNOV] issues that were pre-termitted by the new-trial order.” We disagree. It is not unusual for this Court to instruct a trial court or an intermediate appellate court to address unresolved or-pretermitted issues on remand, provided that the issues have not been waived. Compare Lake v. Memphis Landsmen, LLC, 405 S.W.3d 47, 54 & n.5, 69 (Tenn. 2013) (remanding for the Court of Appeals to decide several issues that had been raised but not determined in the initial appeal), and Tenn. Farmers Life Reassurance Co. v. Rose, 239 S.W.3d 743, 751-52 (Tenn.2007) (remanding for further trial court proceedings to resolve defenses raised in the pleadings which had been pretermitted by an erroneous grant of summary judgment), with In re Estate of Smallman, 398 S.W.3d 134, 162 n.10 (Tenn. 2013) (<HOLDING>). In this in stance, however, the Defendant’s
holding an issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal holding that an issue not raised on appeal is waived holding that a waived issue was not available and should not be reconsidered upon remand holding individual standing issue waived holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal