of the ACCA in light of our decision in United States v. Simmons, 649 F.3d 237 (4th Cir.2011) (en banc). The Government responded that, while Taste may be entitled to resentenc-ing, he had numerous other violent felonies and/or serious drug offenses that would still render him an armed career criminal subject to a mandatory minimum 180- month sentence. Although the Government posited that the e designating him an armed career criminal based in part on his Massachusetts convictions for larceny from the person. We review de novo a district court’s determination of whether prior offenses qualify as violent felonies fo Cir.1993) (larceny from the person as defined under Massachusetts law constitutes a crime of violence); see also United States v. Jarmon, 596 F.3d 228, 230-33 (4th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
holding that north carolina crime of larceny from the person was a crime of violence under the residual clause of the career offender guideline holding that virginia conviction for unlawful wounding qualified as a crime of violence under the career offender guidelines residual clause holding that theft from the person is not a crime of violence holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca holding that the texas offense of possession of a prohibited weapon could only qualify as a crime of violence under the residual clause of  4b12a2