The “phrases ‘substantially limits’ and ‘major life activities’ must be strictly interpreted ‘to create a demanding standard for qualifying as disabled.’ ” Rolland, 492 F.3d at 47 (quoting Toyota Motor Mfg. Ky., Inc. v. Williams, 534 U.S. 184, 197, 122 S.Ct. 681, 151 L.Ed.2d 615 (2002)) (emphasis in original). In order to qualify, “an individual must have a permanent or long term impairment that prevents or severely restricts the individual from doing activities that are of central importance to most people’s daily lives.” Id. at 47-48 (internal quotation marks omitted). The determination of disability is made on a case-by-case basis. Id. at 48. McDonough argues that she actually has an impairment — back an th Cir.2002) (“The nu . of Lafayette Inc., 242 F.3d 610, 614 (5th Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>). Likewise, though McDonough claims that she
holding that plaintiffs hernia condition was not sufficient to render her disabled under the ada holding that plaintiffs inability to stand for more than one hour did not render her disabled holding that it was plain error for trial court to allow more than one conviction of grossly negligent operation of a vehicle where more than one person was injured holding that plaintiffs inability to stand more than two hours was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that she was disabled holding that state may charge separately for the same offense but the convictions for more than one of the offenses cannot stand