the documentary evidence that Likollari submitted during his original asylum proceedings demonstrates that an unstable political climate, political violence, and excessive force by police officers is not a new development in Albania. See Likollari, 178 Fed.Appx. at 907. Moreover, Camaj’s affidavit was in direct conflict with the 2007 Country Report’s assessment that there were no political prisoners or politically motivated disappearances. Thus, it was not an abuse of discretion for the BIA to find Camaj’s statements about the current country conditions unpersuasive to the extent that the statements conflicted with the Country Reports because this Court has held that the BIA may “rely heavily” on Country Reports. Reyes-Sanchez v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 369 F.3d 1239, 1243 (11th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). The BIA, therefore, did not abuse its
holding that an alj is entitled to rely on vocational experts testimony that is based on assumptions that are supported by evidence in the record holding that the ij may not rely on a factually unsupported assertion in a state department report to deem an applicant not credible holding that because the court could not consider police reports it could not rely on an attorneys argument based on the police report as the basis for determining the statutory basis for a conviction holding that the bia is entitled to rely heavily on state department reports holding that a bank is entitled to rely on its deposit agreement when responding to a writ of garnishment