Id. at 3. He testified that he had been taught to keep his arms and legs covered while working with wood to protect against splinters. Id. at 18. He further testified that when he worked for Indiana University, he had not only been admonished not to wear short pants, but he had also been specifically forbidden to wear shorts on the job. Id. Finally, there is no dispute that Mark did not wear long pants the day splinters from the CCA-treated wood punctured his skin. The Restatement (Second) Torts § 466 (1965) sets forth two types of contributory negligence: The plaintiffs contributory negligence may be either (a) an intentional and unreasonable exposure of himself to danger created by the defendant’s negligence, of which danger the plaintiff knows or has reason to know, or (b) ir.1994) (<HOLDING>). 7 . The record before us includes a trial
holding that even though lawyer stated that it was a mistake district court did not err in admitting lawyers statement in memorandum of law that purgess was involved in one incident of asystole one incident where a patient received a black eye and a cut eyelid and one incident where purgess applied a regional block to the wrong shoulder holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest does not violate the fourth amendment holding that blindness in one eye did not automatically constitute a disability holding evidence of one possible burglary before incident at issue insufficient to demonstrate prior criminal activity holding that because defendant initiated conversation leading to statement trial court did not err in admitting statement