of the Board issued a decision affirming the ALJ’s rulings, findings, and conclusions, and incorporating by reference the modifications set forth in the July 13, 2009 decision. See Legacy Health System, 355 NLRB No. 76, 2010 WL 3159238. The panel also adopted the order issued by the prior two-member panel, for the reasons set forth in the July 13, 2009 decision. Id. Two days later, on August 11, 2010, the Board’s General Counsel applied to this court for enforcement of the order. Discussion On appeal, Legacy Health does not challenge the Board’s conclusion that it violated sections 8(a)(1) and (3) of the Act. The Board is, therefore, entitled to summary enforcement of its order with respect to that ruling. NLRB v. Advanced Stretchforming Int’l, Inc., 233 F.3d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). For its part, Legacy Health takes issue only
holding that the board as constituted on the date that the original complaint was filed is the board for purposes of evaluating whether demand is required or excused holding that the board is entitled to summary enforcement of unchallenged rulings recognizing absolute immunity for attorneys and board members of the texas medical board holding that the district court was authorized to remand the proceedings to the board where the board failed to make required findings holding that the denial of enforcement on the basis that the board lacked a proper quorum did not deprive the board of jurisdiction to consider the case anew