of NY., 984 F.2d 35, 39 (2d Cir.1993) (noting public interest in plaintiff’s name appearing on the ballot in a public election). 59 . Def. Mem. at 15. Of note, however, my holding was simply that parties may not "obtain panel deliberations before the close of the arbitration.” Northwestern Nat’l Ins. Co., 2011 WL 4552997, at *8. The FAA is the appropriate avenue by which a party may challenge an arbitration award through allegations of bias after the proceeding. See id. Arbitrators may also seek out ways to report gross misconduct during an arbitration proceeding that does not involve disclosing panel e-mails to the arbitrating parties. 60 . See Def. Mem. at 14-15. 61 . See Jock, 738 F.Supp.2d at 449. 62 . Cf In re Genesis Health Ventures, Inc., 367 B.R. 516, 522 (Bankr.D.Del.2007)
holding appeal moot on this basis holding same as to the filing of a notice of an interlocutory appeal holding that it is not in the public interest to compel parties to go through the expense of preparing a case for trial when all of that preparation could be rendered moot by a reversal on an interlocutory appeal holding that a case is moot when the parties lack a legally cognizable interest in the outcome holding that because the standard of review for factual determinations on direct appeal is higher than the standard applied during an interlocutory appeal of a preliminary injunction the interlocutory appeal normally will not establish law of the case on factual matters