an analog radio communication system, an add-on radio, or service for analog radios. However, prior to making these purchases, Nextel did not inform them that it would be discontinuing analog service in the area in the immediate future, thereby rendering their equipment useless and obsolete. The plaintiffs also alleged that they were adequate class representatives. In Count I, H & J alleged a cause of action pursuant to the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practice Act, § 501.201, et seq., Fla. Stat. (1995) [FDUTPA], In Count II, Asphalt alleged a claim for breach of contract. Based on H & J invoking its Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the trial court struck H & J as class representative and dismissed its class claims with prejudice, but allo (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)(<HOLDING>). Next, H & J and Asphalt contend that the
holding that the filing of a class action by a class representative without standing tolls the period of limitations with regard to all asserted members of the class and that the amendment of the complaint by the addition of a class member with standing relates back to the original complaint recognizing a narrow class of cases in which the termination of the class representatives claim for relief does not moot the claims of the class members holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory holding that in class action the claim or defense of the representative party must be typical of the claim or defense of each member of the class holding that to maintain a class action the existence of the class must be pleaded and the limits of the class must be defined with some specificity