a pending criminal investigation, we conclude that a remand to the trial court is appropriate to allow the City an opportunity to review the field interview cards and to submit to the trial court for in camera review those cards or portions of cards which the City maintains are involved in an ongoing criminal investigation and exempt from disclosure. Petitioners shall be granted immediate access to all field interview cards not submitted to the trial court for in camera review. The trial court shall determine which of the field interview cards or portions of them are exempt from disclosure. An entire field interview card should not be deemed exempt simply because it contains some exempt information. Rather, redaction of the exempt information is appropriate. Eldridge, 86 S.W.3d at 574 (<HOLDING>). The trial court has discretion to prescribe
recognizing that refinement of rule governing confidential court records was a necessary step in providing the public electronic access to court records recognizing medical records contain the same protected confidential information as a physicians direct testimony about the communications holding records did not qualify as exempt confidential commercial information under exemption 4 because the information was not actually confidential holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information holding that county could redact from public records any information made confidential by statute with any redaction  subject to review by the chancellor