depart China without difficulty, and, according to her final version of events, using her own passport. Weng argues that her ability to depart from Hong Kong with her own passport does not undermine her credibility. Again, however, her explanation would not be compelling to a reasonable factfinder. See id. Lastly, the agency reasonably noted that Weng’s failure to provide a document she claimed Chinese police had served on her parents further undermined her credibility. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(l)(B)(ii). Although Weng argues that it would have been difficult for her illiterate parents to deliver this document from China, the agency did not err finding that her failure to produce this document further undermined her credibility. See Biao Yang v. Gonzales, 496 F.3d 268, 273 (2d Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>); Majidi, 430 F.3d at 80-81. Ultimately,
holding that the agency may rely on a lack of corroborative evidence where an applicants testimony is not otherwise credible holding that a court may rely on otherwise inadmissible evidence including hearsay evidence at the preliminary injunction stage holding that the ij may not rely on a factually unsupported assertion in a state department report to deem an applicant not credible holding that party may not rely on conclusory statements or an argument that the affidavits in support of the motion for summary judgment are not credible holding that an ij need not first identify the particular pieces of missing relevant evidence and show that this evidence was reasonably available to the applicant when he or she is not otherwise credible