62 Fed.Reg. 61,794, 61,796 (Nov. 19,1997). Thus, Commerce, if the proportion of the market economy purchases are “meaningful” or “significant,” values the entire FOP using the price paid in the market economy. The record supports Commerce’s conclusion that Shanghai General’s market purchases were “meaningful” and “significant.” See Final Results 62 Fed. Reg. at 6191. Similarly, the statute does not require Commerce to resort to a weighted average methodology when valuing FOPs where: (1) only a portion of the FOP to be valued is sourced by the NME producer domestically; and (2) another portion is purchased by the NME producer in an arm’s-length transaction from market economy sources and paid for in market economy currency. See Nation Ford Chem., 21 CIT at 1376, 985 F.Supp. at 137 (<HOLDING>). While the Court agrees with Timken’s
holding that the statute as applied violates the commerce clause holding that nothing in the statute prohibits commerce from valuing the fop as it did because commerce does not have to duplicate the exact production experience of an nme manufacturer at the expense of choosing a surrogate that most accurately represents the fmv of the surrogate in the hypothetically created marketeconomy version of the nme holding the limitations to congresss commerce clause authority recognized in lopez have no effect on the establishment of the interstate commerce element of the hobbs act holding that a religious foundation is an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the fair labor standards act holding that commerce has no obligation to notify the parties beforehand that commerce had chosen a surrogate country different from that designated in the initial determination