1996 WL 374186 at ⅜1 (July 2, 1996), for the proposition that "[a]n individual’s statements about the intensity and persistence of pain or other symptoms or about the effect the symptoms have on his or her ability to work may not be disregarded solely because they are not substantiated by medical evi dence,” Id. at *1 (emphasis added). But here, as discussed, the ALJ articulated other grounds for not crediting Ybarra’s testimony supported by evidence in the record, as required by SSR96-7p. See id. at *2, 2 . Plaintiff is correct that the ALJ relied on Ybarra’s deferral of steroid injections without considering whether Ybarra might have deferred the injections because he could not afford them. This was inappropriate. See Henry v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 802 F.3d 1264, 1269 (11th Cir. 2015) (<HOLDING>); SSR 96-7p, 1996 WL 374186 at *7-8 (”[T]he
holding that alj committed reversible error in failing to consider whether a claimants failure to seek treatment was due to his financial circumstances holding that failure to consider guidelines note in applying sentencing enhancement was reversible error holding that a claimants failure to lose weight does not constitute a refusal to follow the treatment holding that failure to review the evidence presented to the magistrate and failure even to have a transcript filed with the district court  was reversible error holding that it was reversible error for the trial court to consider cumulative error in assessing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel