years after the fatal accident. Nevertheless, the State urges that Kifer's "positive acts" of, among other things, altering and selling his car, "tolled the statute of limitations] because they concealed the fact of Kifer's crime[.]" Brief of Appellee at 5. Contrary to the State's contention, however, Kifer's alteration and disposal of his car did not amount to concealment of the fact that a crime had been committed but was only concealment of his guilt. It is well settled that concealment of guilt is not concealment of the fact that an offense has been committed. See Robinson v. State, 57 Ind. 113, 114 (1877) (interpreting predecessor statute); State v. Holmes, 181 Ind.App. 634, 637, 398 N.E.2d 242, 244 (1979) (interpreting predecessor statute); see also Umfleet, 556 N.E.2d at 342 (<HOLDING>). To constitute concealment of evidence of the
holding that defendants denial of involvement in alleged child abuse not positive act to conceal fact that offense had been committed holding that a defendants sentence is controlled by the law in effect at the time he committed the offense holding that denial of untimely request was not abuse of discretion holding denial of continuance to be an abuse of discretion holding that duress is unavailable to defendants charged with the strict liability offense of child abuse