“divide the estate in a manner that the court deemed just and right, as provided by law.” Id. at *3. The court considered the finding of economic contribution to be part of the property division. Id. at *4. Here, Timothy does not raise a sufficiency argument. His sole issue on appeal is that Kelly’s pleadings do not support the award of spousal maintenance. The scope of our review is therefore limited to the pleadings, which consist solely of Kelly’s original petition. See Stoner, 578 S.W.2d at 683-85 (reviewing plaintiffs pleadings and holding pleadings did not support default judgment for monetary damages). Like the petition in Reimert, Kelly’s petition requested a division of community property. But unlike Reimert, which held that an award of economic cont -Dallas 2008, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). We therefore consider whether Kelly’s
holding that award and rate of prejudgment interest are within trial courts discretion holding prayer for general relief does not support award of commonlaw prejudgment interest as element of damages holding that loss of earnings was sufficiently encompassed by general prayer for relief recognizing that prejudgment interest was an element of damages in a civil theft ease holding prayer for general relief does not support award of attorneys fees