asserts the order has the effect of granting a new trial and thus falls under section 14-3-330(2) (b). However, in holding an order granting Rule 60(b) relief to set aside a default judgment is not immediately appealable, this court explained such orders “a elief was not immediately appealable, the North Carolina Court of Appeals explained: “The right to avoid one trial on the disputed issues is not normally a substantial right that would allow an interlocutory appeal.” Metcalf v. Palmer, 46 N.C.App. 622, 265 S.E.2d 484, 485 (1980). In applying their statute similar to our section 14-3-830(b), the North Carolina courts have consistently held an order granting Rule 60(b) relief is not immediately appealable. See Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc., 294 N.C. 200, 240 S.E.2d 338 (1978) (<HOLDING>); Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 270 S.E.2d
holding that a summary judgment order determining only a question of evidence sufficiency ie which facts a party may or may not be able to prove at trial is not immediately appealable holding order setting aside summary judgment for procedural irregularity was not immediately appealable holding that an order of consolidation is interlocutory and not immediately appealable holding an order denying a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable holding such denial to be an immediately appealable collateral final order