a search warrant, (d) Officers are not authorized to break and enter at an offender’s residence ... to 'conduct a warrantless search. Id. The Manual also provided that “[s]earches [shall] not invade the privacy of a third party.” Id. In State ex rel. Corgan v. King, 868 P.2d 743 (Okla.Crim.App.1994), the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals considered for the first time what constitutes a “reasonable” warrantless search of a parolee’s residence and concluded that a search which complies with the Manual is reasonable for Fourth Amendment purposes. See id. at 746. We agree that the prerequisites to a warrantless search of a parolee’s residence in Oklahoma comply with the reasonableness requirement of the Fourth Amendment. See Griffin, 483 U.S. at 870-71, 880, 107 S.Ct. at 3166-67, 3172 (<HOLDING>); Lewis, 71 F.3d at 362 (concluding Utah
holding warrantless search of probationers home by law enforcement officer for investigatory purposes was reasonable when conditions of probation included a search term and search was supported by reasonable suspicion holding wisconsin supreme courts interpretation of regulation requiring reasonable grounds for warrantless search of probationers residence satisfies fourth amendment reasonableness requirement holding a search of a probationers home pursuant to a wisconsin probation regulation was permissible under a special needs theory but not addressing whether the probationer had consented to the search under the regulation holding unanimously that a warrantless search of a probationers apartment that was supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized as a condition of his probation was reasonable within the meaning of the fourth amendment holding a warrantless probation search condition that is reasonably related to a probationers rehabilitation is a valid limitation to a defendants fourth amendment rights