Sch. Dist. Bd. of Ed., 4 F.3d 1103, 1128 (3d Cir.1993) ("As a general matter, we believe that elections involving white candidates only are much less probative of racially polarized voting than elections involving both black and white candidates.”); Black Political Task Force, 300 F.Supp.2d at 304 ("After having conducted an exhaustive review of the case law and the circumstances of this litigation, we conclude that the most probative elections for our purposes are likely to be multi-race endogenous elections.”); Bone Shirt, 461 F.3d at 1020-21 (8th Cir.2006) (“Endogenous and interracial elections are the best indicators of whether the white majority usually defeats the minority candidate.”) (footnote omitted); see also Gingles, 478 U.S. at 83, 106 S.Ct. 2752 (White, J. concurring) (<HOLDING>); id. at 101, 106 S.Ct. 2752 (O’Connor, J.,
holding that title vii proscribes racial discrimination against whites upon the same standards as racial discrimination against nonwhites holding that title vii proscribe racial discrimination in private employment against whites on the same terms as racial discrimination against nonwhites holding that racial discrimination is a personal injury tort holding that disregarding race of victors is interestgroup politics rather than a rule hedging against racial discrimination holding that racial discrimination is not a personal injury tort