an activity that affects interstate commerce. D. The Application of Jones to Laton’s Indictment We now turn to the application of Jones’s two-part analysis to the destruction of the HFS. The first step is to identify the function of the HFS and the equipment that the building housed. A building and the personal property within that building can have multiple functions. See Jones, 529 U.S. at 856, 120 S.Ct. 1904 (distinguishing the private home at issue from a residence that was also used as a home office or for a commercial enterprise). Accordingly, a “building’s function is not limited to its primary use.” Rayborn, 312 F.3d at 233. Churches, for example, primarily serve a religious function, but churches can also have secondary and important economic purposes. Terry, 257 F.3d at 369 (<HOLDING>); United States v. Grassie, 237 F.3d 1199,
holding that finding of implied trust in the general church was correct under both neutral principles of law and compulsory deference approaches holding that one partys economic status may cause it to forego certain rights it would otherwise have against the other party holding that economic loss rule precludes recovery of economic damages only in the absence of personal injury or property  damage claims holding that an action for tortious interference with prospective economic advantage may not be directed against an individual who is an officer and the sole stockholder of a corporation which is a party to the economic relationship at issue holding that a church can have both a religious aspect and an economic one when the church operated a daycare center