was precluded from pursuing any remaining claims against the Lemonses because a stay was issued in the Lemonses’ separate bankruptcy proceeding; that the conversion claim, the “meritorious issue on appeal,” had been fully litigated and was ripe for review; and that the Lemonses’ dismissal was merely a “housekeeping matter” that did not affect finality. In the alternative, Ballard asks that her appeal be dismissed without prejudice, if it is going to be dismissed. We must dismiss this appeal because the default judgment, which Ballard sought to appeal, was not a final order because Ally’s claims against the Lemonses had not been [ sadjudicated or dismissed when the default judgment was entered. Vimy Ridge Mun. Water Improvement Dist. No. 139 v. Ryles, 369 Ark. 217, 253 S.W.3d 436 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Given the course of events, we dismiss the
holding that an order remanding an arbitration award is not a final appealable order when the order does not also vacate the arbitration award holding that summary judgment order that does not dispose of all claims between parties does not confer appellate jurisdiction because it is not a final decision under 28 usc  1291 holding that an order is not a final appealable order when it does not dispose of the complaints against all of the defendants holding that because trial courts order did not dispose of the defendants counterclaim that order was not a final judgment that would support an appeal holding summary judgment order was not a final judgment because it did not dispose of the defendants claim for attorneys fees