to Guatemala to hold meetings with job applicants. Defendants also do not dispute that Eller has the authority to fire any individual employed by Eller and Sons Trees, although he normally delegates this duty to others. It is further e and hour matters at Eller and Sons Trees. In this regard, it is undisputed that Eller set up the pay structure for tree planters at Eller and Sons Trees. Eller has attended AWPA and FLSA compliance seminars on behalf of Eller and Sons Trees and has been the officer in charge of certifying the company’s compliance with the provisions of those laws. Such facts have been considered significant by other courts in examining the issue of employer status. See Stout v. Smolar, Civil Action No. 1:05-CV- 1202-JOF, 2007 WL 2765519, at *5 (N.D.Ga. Sept.18, 2007) (<HOLDING>); Donohue v. Francis Servs., No. Civ.A. 04-170,
holding among other things that the officers observations that the defendant was under the influence of a controlled substance without more did not establish probable cause to believe that the defendant had committed a crime holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to among other things set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements holding individual defendant liable where he among other things made inquiries into the business obligations under the flsa holding it error to admit testimony where among other things there was no evidence that defendants appearance had changed since the time of the robbery holding that defendant did not breach oral agreement because among other things the plaintiff had not established that the term in question was part of the oral contract