of jurisdiction. Vacated and remanded. 1 . WMATA also filed a third-party complaint against Blocker and Rudd, which the district court dismissed. WMATA appeals that dism Cir. 107, 1994 WL 1031399, at *2 (Va. Cir. Ct.1994) (attorney’s equitable claim against settlement fund); Slaughter v. Winston, 347 F.Supp. 1221, 1222-23 (E.D.Va.1972) (garnishment); Phillips v. Rector of Univ. of Va., 97 Va. 472, 34 S.E. 66 (1899) (mechanic’s lien); see also Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc., 525 U.S. 255, 264, 119 S.Ct. 687, 142 L.Ed.2d 718 (1999) (noting that "sovereign immunity bars creditors from attaching or garnishing funds in the Treasury, or enforcing liens against property owned by the United States” (citations omitted)); Knight v. United States, 982 F.2d 1573, 1578-79 (Fed. Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). 7 . We look to District of Columbia law to
holding that the ats does not waive the united states sovereign immunity holding that sovereign immunity does not bar extinguishment of united states junior lien in proceeding in which united states was not a party holding that sovereign immunity bars an attorneys lien against the united states holding that state sovereign immunity bars state constitutional claims holding that sovereign immunity bars dchra claim against the department of commerce