in a divorce proceeding "is not necessarily binding on the trial court. It is only a recommendation to be adhered to if the trial court believes it to be fair and reasonable." Colman v. Colman, 743 P.2d 782, 789 (Utah Ct.App.1987). In other words, "even if the trial court['s divorce decree] does not exactly follow the parties' agreement, such a decree is still within the court's reasonable discretion." Id. This is so because, in accordance with the equitable power of trial courts in divorcee actions, trial courts should not be prevented "from doing that which justice and equity require for the interest and welfare of the parties involved." Reese v. Reese, 1999 UT 75, ¶ 25, 984 P.2d 987 (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Land v. Land, 605 P.2d 1248, 1251 n. 5 (Utah 1980) (<HOLDING>). 124 In this case, Husband filed a motion to
holding that the mclendon standard applied where an agreement between the parties granted the parties joint legal custody of the child with physical custody to the mother and the agreement had been adopted by the trial court holding that a bankruptcy court cannot rewrite an agreement and by doing so approve terms that differ from those to which the parties agreed in evaluating a proposed settlement or compromise under rule 9019 the court must accept or reject the agreement as presented holding the sale valid as between the original parties despite noncompliance with the act recognizing that a trial court has discretion to adopt or reject an agreement between the parties as part of the original divorcee decree  as equity might dictate holding that nolostprofits clause in parties agreement was not unconscionable as a matter of law in part because similar clause had been in the agreement between the parties for years