that overpayment be recovered by deductions from claimant's continuing benefit payments). Given these safeguards, Abbott puts employers at no risk of suffering any kind of permanent wrongful deprivation. 17 . Specifically, General Construction argues that it "had a direct financial stake in whether the vocational plan concocted by the consultant hired by the Department of Labor went forward because, under Abbott, it was going to be liable for total disability compensation under that program.” As noted, any liability for compensation on General Construction's part under Abbott did not arise until Castro had (1) filed a claim for benefits and (2) at a hearing, carried his burden of showing that his rehabilitation program precluded his employment. See Kee, 333 Ben. Rev. Bd. Serv. at 223
holding that the plaintiff bears the burden of showing that he has standing for each type of relief sought holding that claimant moving for summary judgment on its claim must conclusively prove all the essential elements of the claim and that claimant has the burden to show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that claimant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law holding that claimant has burden of showing that suitable alternative jobs were realistically unavailable while he was in the rehabilitation program holding that the burden of proof is on the claimant holding that the debtor has the burden of showing that collateral estoppel applies