from China, 68 Fed.Reg. 27787 (May 21, 2003). In U.S. Ass’n of Importers of Textiles & Apparel v. United States, 350 F.Supp.2d 1342, 28 CIT - (CIT 2004), appeal docketed, No. 05-1209 (Fed.Cir. Feb. 2, 2005), familiarity with which is presumed, the Court granted a preliminary injunction in this case and reserved judgment on defendant’s Motion to Dismiss until full briefing on the issues raised therein was completed. On January 19, 2005, plaintiff timely filed its Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and, on February 7, 2005, defendant timely filed its Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. The motion is now appropriately before the Court. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is denied i T 1181, 1185, 903 F.Supp. 72, 76-77 (1995) (<HOLDING>); Mast Indus., Inc. v. Regan, 8 CIT 214,
holding that this court has jurisdiction pursuant to  1581i to consider claims involving citas administration of quotas holding that this court has jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeals in cases involving a sentence of life imprisonment or death holding that this court can consider claims not specifically excluded by a coa holding that juvenile court has no jurisdiction to consider constitutional claims holding that district court had jurisdiction to consider claims under the all writs act