about the key occurred before or after he was advised of his Miranda rights that an objection was lodged as to Officer McCain’s testimony. It has long been held that a specific objection is required when the evidence is offered at trial to preserve the issue for appellate review. Boydston, 198 S.W.3d at 674. “‘Failure to object at the earliest opportunity to the admission of evidence constitutes a waiver of the claim.’ ” State v. Turner, 242 S.W.3d 770, 777 (Mo.App.2008) (quoting State v. Campbell, 147 S.W.3d 195, 205 (Mo.App.2004)). Appellant has not requested we review this issue under the plain error rule found in Rule 30.20, Missouri Court Rules (2007), and we decline to do so sua sponte based on the record before this Court. See State v. Dismang, 151 S.W.3d 155, 162 (Mo.App.2004) (<HOLDING>). Point denied. The judgment and sentence of
holding that issues raised for first time on appeal generally will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice holding that unless the claim of plain error clearly establishes substantial grounds for believing a miscarriage of justice has resulted the court will decline to exercise its discretion to review for plain error holding that a trial court does not commit plain error unless the error is clear under current law holding that any error was harmless and thus not plain error