a highway in this state without a license, driver permit or out-of-state license in the person’s possession; or “(b) Does not present and deliver such license or permit to a police officer when requested by the police officer under any of the following circumstances: “(A) Upon being lawfully stopped or detained when driving a vehicle. * * * * “(4) A police officer may detain a person arrested or cited for the offense described in this section only for such time as reasonably necessary to investigate and verify the person’s identity.” (Emphasis added.) Here, the question is not whether the officers had probable cause. Defendant committed the crime when he failed to present a driver’s license when requested to do so by Watts. See State v. Scheer, 99 Or App 80, 84-85, 781 P2d 859 (1989) (<HOLDING>). The question is whether the officers detained
holding that department of transportation did not have control of motorists drivers license because although the department of transportation may have had a duty to recall the motorists license this authority to revoke does not involve physical possession or actual control sufficient to bring the license within the ambit of the personal property exception to sovereign immunity holding governments repudiation of license gave patentee right to terminate license recognizing validity of retroactive license that memorialized grant of oral license holding that age disclosed on a drivers license constituted an admission where the party swore to the truth of the statements made in the license application holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer