the Tribe, the expenses covered in § 548.077 necessarily include litigation expenses and monetary judgments. However, responsibility for any judgment rendered against the Commission in this case may be assumed by the state through the Florida Risk Management Trust Fund. See Fla. Stat. § 284.30; see also Tuveson, 734 F.2d at 734 (“Responsibility for any judgment in this case against the Council will be assumed by the state through the Florida Risk Management Trust Fund.”). This state self-insurance fund judgments rendered against the Florida Commission. Since all four factors support the conclusion that the Florida Commission is an arm of the state, the Florida Commission is entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit. See Schopler v. Bliss, 903 F.2d 1373, 1378-79 (11th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). 111. Conclusion We agree with the district
holding that pennsylvanias judicial districts are entitled to immunity from suit under the eleventh amendment holding that  1983 does not override states eleventh amendment immunity holding that local school boards were not entitled to eleventh amendment immunity even though entitled to sovereign immunity in the same degree as the state itself from tort suits holding that the dpr and a board within the dpr were entitled to eleventh amendment immunity holding that the department of corrections was entitled to eleventh amendment immunity from suit under section 1981