development of all persons to the limits of their capacities. The State shall provide for an efficient system of high quality public educational institutions and services. Education in public schools through the secondary level shall be free. There may be such other free education as the General Assembly provides by law.” (Ill. Const. 1970, art. X, § 1.) There is no question that this article mandates that the legislature provide an efficient, high quality educational system which is free to the public. Allen v. Maurer (1972), 6 Ill. App. 3d 633, 640, 286 N.E.2d 135, 140 ("the State has a constitutional duty to provide and the public has a right to receive an efficient, high quality educational system”); see Elliot v. Board of Education (1978), 64 Ill. App. 3d 229, 380 N.E.2d 1137 (<HOLDING>). See also 2 Record of Proceedings, Sixth
holding that sc const art xi  3 which requires the general assembly to provide for the maintenance and support of a system of free public education guarantees only a minimally adequate education and does not call for this court to dictate what programs are to be used in this states public schools holding legislature was required to provide a system of free education to the public including programs for the handicapped holding that whenever the local agency refuses or wrongfully neglects to provide a handicapped child with a free appropriate education that child can be best served on the regional or state level holding that wisconsin violated equal protection rights of handicapped children by denying them an education at public expense recognizing that under the act states are granted federal funds to provide disabled children with a free appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment