though a plaintiff may pursue any number of common law claims in conjunction with the statutory cause of action, the plaintiff will be required to select either treble damages or punitive damages, in the event each are awarded. 9 . See generally Lisa K. Gregory, Annotation, Plaintiff s Rights to Punitive or Multiple Damages When Cause of Action Renders Both Available, 2 A.L.R. 5th 449, 459 (1992). 10 . See Grogan v. Garner, 806 F.2d 829, 839 (8th Cir.1986) (recognizing that when a statutory federal securities claim overlaps with a pendent state law claim, once a determination of liability and damages is made under each claim, the plaintiff is "entitled to the greatest amount recoverable under any single theory pled... SuperTurf, Inc. v. Monsanto Co., 660 F.2d 1275, 1284 (8th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>); Bill Terry's, Inc. v. Atlantic Motor Sales,
holding that the sixth amendments guarantee of a trial by jury requires the jury to base its verdict only on the evidence presented at trial holding that trial court erred by requiring plaintiff to select which remedy to submit to the jury because plaintiff was allowed to elect its remedy between punitive damages and statutory treble after the jurys verdict on all claims was rendered holding that plaintiffs request that inquiry be made of the jury about its intent behind the verdict was not a request to poll the jury holding that where a plaintiff is entitled to treble damages under its state unfair trade practices act and to punitive damages under common law claims of fraud trial court should have submitted each theory of recovery to the jury and then allowed plaintiff to elect between the awards with duplicative elements holding that the trial court erred by denying plaintiffs request to instruct the jury on all its claims and to submit a special verdict form and by instead requiring the plaintiff to elect between its statutory antitrust claim and its common law tort claims to be submitted to the jury