evidence for the trial court to find that Dr. Meacher was at fault and that Colleton was not at fault. In making this argument, Colleton cites the following stipulations: (1) “At the Grant trial, Dr. Mazo testified that Dr. Meacher’s failure to order an ultrasound was a departure from [the] standard of care.”; (2) “The only evidence introduced at the Grant trial by Plaintiff as to negligence or departure from [the] standard of care by either Defendant was limited to alleged departures by Dr. Meacher.”; and (3) “At the Grant trial, Dr. Mazo testified that in his opinion, to a reasonable degree of medical certainty, the cause of the loss of a testicle by Grant was the misdiagnosis of testicular torsion by Meacher.” All of the above stipulations, however, me S.E.2d 331, 336 (Ct.App.1992) (<HOLDING>). We recognize that settlement alone does not
holding that stipulations involving questions of law are not binding on the court holding that subject matter questions may be but are not necessarily decided before questions of personal jurisdiction recognizing stipulations the one at issue in particular are treated as contracts holding that parties are generally bound by the stipulations they agree to holding that disputes involving questions of interpretation of a tribal constitution and tribal law is not within the jurisdiction of the district court