85 . See PL 56.1 ¶¶ 1-8; Treatment Documents from Dr. Elizabeth A. Greenberg, D.C., Ex. 7 to Meyerson Deck, at 2. Pinter's deposition only mentions cold and numbness in his hands, but a subsequent submission to the Court mentions "pain and serious discomfort.” PL 56.1 ¶ 5. In any case, a reasonable jury could infer that Pinter experienced pain in his wrists from Pinter’s description of the tightening handcuffs and from the fact that he later sought treatment for pain in his hands and wrists. See id. ¶¶ 5, 8 & n. 8. 86 . The Supreme Court has held that the need to detain multiple individuals in an enclosed space "ma[kes] the use of handcuffs all the more reasonable.” Muehler v. Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 100, 125 S.Ct. 1465, 161 L.Ed.2d 299 (2005). 87 . See Amnesty Am., 361 F.3d at 124 (<HOLDING>). 88 . I held in Pinter I that "defendants have
holding that gratuitous infliction of pain is unreasonable under the fourth amendment holding sbm is not a violation of the defendants fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures holding that the fourth amendment remedy sought is suppression holding that repeatedly striking a subdued individual would constitute an objectively unreasonable use of force under the fourth amendment holding that the fourth amendment right implicated in a malicious prosecution action is the right to be free of unreasonable seizure of the person