that request is not waived by continuing to make payments. 14 . See also Woods v. Greenpoint Mortg. Funding, Inc., No. 2:09-1810, 2010 WL 1729711, at *4, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41492, at *10 (E.D.Ca. Apr. 27, 2010) ("[T]he failure to hon- or plaintiff's rescission request or request for information is a separate actionable violation of TILA.”); Stewart v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, No. 10-CV-2033, 2011 WL 862938, at *6, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24715, at *17 (N.D.Ill. Mar. 10, 2011) ("A claim for damages for failure to honor rescission is based on § 1635(b) of TILA, which requires a creditor to respond to a notice of rescission within twenty days of receipt.”); Sall v. Bounassissi, No. 10-CV-2245, 2011 WL 2791254, at *8, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75363, at *22-23 (D.Md. July 13, 2011) (<HOLDING>); Abel v. Knickerbocker Realty Co., 846 F.Supp.
holding that the separate and distinct claims of two or more plaintiffs cannot be aggregated to establish jurisdiction holding that a claim for damages based on creditors failure to honor a rescission notice is separate and distinct from any claims associated with disclosures at the time of closing holding that plaintiffs claim for loss of consortium is separate and distinct from spouses malpractice claim for purposes of applying insurance policy limitations holding that settlement with one defendant could not be setoff from verdict against second defendant where the claims were separate and distinct ie involving different elements of damages holding that a refusal to separate out time spent on distinct claims is within the trial courts discretion if the claims are so factually imbricated  as to make separate treatment of the constituent attorney time inappropriate