use herein, which allows for the fact that, just because something is quantifiable in principle, the quantity need not be ascertainable in precise terms in a given case to maintain its character as pecuniary. 21 . See United States v. Blagojevich, 794 F.3d 729, 734-39 (7th Cir. 2015) (discussing, in the context of a Hobbs Act bribery prosecution of the then-Governor of Illinois, the distinction between accepting something of value for an official act and "logrolling,” the solicitation of political favors in exchange for same; observing that, for example, under an expansive interpretation, it would be criminal for a sitting governor to solicit federal funds for public works projects in exchange for appointing a particular individual to a vacant Senate seat); cf. Moran, 104 A.3d at 1147 (<HOLDING>). 22 . For reasons set forth at greater length
holding that defense of fraud was waived where no special issue was submitted and there was disputed evidence holding that a tortfeasor is required to pay the expenses of over treatment or unnecessary medical treatment unless such treatment was incurred by the victim in bad faith  holding that imposition occurs at time of oral pronouncement holding that imposition occurs at time of entry of judgment holding that bribery only occurs where there is some offer of special treatment in exchange for something of value