annual fee. “The Maintenance Plan shall be renewable annually after the initial 90 day Warranty period, and Customer shall pay therefor in advance according to the then current Maintenance Fee ...” (Appendix to Plaintiffs Response, Exhibit 2 ¶ 8). The Court finds that the 90 day warranty covers defects which appear within the 90 day period following installation. Since no defects appeared in the software prior to that date, NMP’s breach of warranty claim is time barred. See, Office Supply Co., Inc. v. Basic/Four Corp., 538 F.Supp. 776 (.D.Wis. 1982) (upholding 90-day warranty limitation and granting summary judgment on breach of contract claim where defects in computer system arose outside of warranty period); Dreier Co., Inc. v. Unitronix Corp., 218 N.J.Super. 260, 527 A.2d 875 (1986) (<HOLDING>); Liecar Liquors, Ltd. v. CBS Business
holding plaintiff was barred from seeking remedy because express warranty expired in accordance with time limits elucidated in the limited repair and replace warranty holding inter alia defendant breached implied warranty of merchantability where an express warranty regarding safety of goods was printed on package and where goods failed to conform to the express warranty holding that warranty claim accrued at tender where 180 day warranty on computer not a warranty for future performance as it involved a remedy only holding that one year warranty was not an exclusive remedy for defective construction where the contract did not so state holding plaintiffs were not foreclosed from pursuing ucc remedies outside of written warranty because warranty notice provision did not specify that the remedies provided were exclusive of any other remedy