as to what it legitimately may do with the evidence.”). Therefore, the error in this ease was not harmless and requires reversal. IV. For the foregoing reasons, we reverse the judgment below and remand for a new trial. REVERSED AND REMANDED 1 . Citations to the "S.J.A.” refer to the Supplemental Joint Appendix filed by the parties in this appeal. 2 . Citations to the “J.A.” refer to the Joint Appendix filed by the parties in this appeal. 3 . Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs,, 436 U.S. 658, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 56 L.Ed.2d 611 (1978). 4 . The motion also mentioned a fourth arrest, which was not presented to the jury. 5 . The district court later entered judgment in favor of BCPD and Batts pursuant to City of Los Angeles v. Heller, 475 U.S. 796, 799, 106 S.Ct. 1571, 89 L.Ed.2d 806 (1986) (<HOLDING>). See Order, Smith v. Baltimore City Police
holding that no monell claim can lie where a court finds no constitutional violation holding that a city may not be held liable under  1983 where there was no underlying constitutional violation by any of its officers holding a sheriff could not be liable for implementing county policies where no underlying violation of decedents rights had occurred holding that where no underlying constitutional violation occurred the city cannot be liable under monell holding that city may properly be held liable where policy is moving force behind constitutional violation