Request Form. The response from Shuckrow was that this was not a medical issue and that he sh .La. June 9, 2006) (dismissing claim of failure to provide adequate medical care against supervisory officials who “acted consistent with their roles in the prison administration by addressing plaintiffs grievance or referring him to an avenue by which he might obtain relief’); Mosley v. Thornton, 2005 WL 1645781, at *5 (E.D.La. June 20, 2005) (“Plaintiff merely alleges that the Warden was responsible for Thornton and the medical department and that he responded to plaintiffs appeal ... However, the fact that the Sheriff responded to plaintiffs appeal is insufficient to support a constitutional claim against the Sheriff.”); Jones v. Livingston, 2005 WL 3618316, at *3 (S.D.Tex. Jan. 6, 2005) (<HOLDING>); Anderson v. Pratt, 2002 WL 1159980, at *3
holding that a state is required to provide medical care to incarcerated individuals holding that failure to provide adequate medical care claim asserted against supervisory prison official should be dismissed because the fact that he did not respond to or denied plaintiffs grievances does not alone state a claim   holding that an inmate has a first amendment right to file grievances against prison officials holding that private doctor under contract with a state prison to provide medical care to prisoners acted under color of state law when he treated inmate holding that administrative remedies are unavailable if prison officials fail to respond to prisoners grievances