foreign tribunal, the character of the proceedings underway abroad, and the receptivity of the foreign government or the court or agency abroad to U.S. federal-court judicial assistance”; (3) “whether the § 1782(a) request conceals an attempt to circumvent foreign proof-gathering restrictions or other policies of a foreign country or the United States”; and (4) whether the request is otherwise “unduly intrusive or burdensome.” In re Clerici, 481 F.3d at 1334 (quoting Intel, 542 U.S. at 264-65, 124 S.Ct. 2466). Section 1782(a) further “directs judges to provide discovery assistance pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” Weber v. Finker, 554 F.3d 1379, 1383 (11th Cir.2009), so long as the order does not prescribe the practice a Ltd., 2010 WL 1796579, at *6-7 (S.D.Fla.2010) (<HOLDING>); see also Comision Ejecutiva, Hidroelectrica
holding issues within scope of administrative hearing are within the reviewing courts purview holding that the flsa is not within the purview of section 5 of the fourteenth amendment holding that bad faith handling of an insureds claim fell within the act holding an arbitration tribunal fell within the purview of section 1782 holding in a title vii case that it was within the purview of the courts discretion to determine whether or not the actual time expended by an additional attorney was reasonable