plaintiffs have not provided the Court with any Tennessee law that contradicts this directive from Columbia Gulf, the Court finds it unnecessary to certify the question presented by plaintiffs. Accordingly, for these reasons, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ Motion to Certify Question of State Law to the Tennessee Supreme Court [Doc. 81]. 3. Analysis “An easement is a right to some lawful use of the real property of another.” Columbia Gulf, 2006 WL 2449909, at *3 (citations omitted). It confers upon the easement holder “an enforceable right to use that real property for a specified use.” Id. (citations omitted). Although an easement can be created several ways, it may be created by express grant, as was the case with the 1937 Easement and the 1963 Easement. See Burlison, 533 F.3d at 426 (<HOLDING>). Pursuant to the 1937 Easement, TVA acquired
recognizing that an easement may entitle the easement owner to do acts which were not for the easement would constitute a nuisance recognizing ways in which an easement may be created recognizing that where a grantee has an easement which he shares with others his duty to repair and maintain it must be apportioned with all other easement holders based upon the extent of the individuals use of the easement holding that an easement agreement and an unrecorded easement plan created an easement recognizing that one cannot have an easement in his own land