constitute prima facie evidence of the validity of the Foundation’s copyright, and all facts stated in the certificates.” (Pl.’s Br. at 3 n. 1.) The plaintiff claims such action would be proper because “17 U.S.C. § 410(c) ... provides that the weight given to any certificate issued more than 5 years after publication of the work is left to the Court’s discretion.” (Pl.’s Br. at 2 n. 1.) I decline the plaintiffs invitation. See Picture Music, Inc. v. Bourne, Inc., 457 F.2d 1213, 1214-15 n. 3 (2d Cir.) (explaining Register of Copyrights typically allows conflicting claimants to register for renewal without determining validity of claim), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 997, 93 S.Ct. 320, 34 L.Ed.2d 262 (1972); Epoch Producing Corp. v. Killiam Shows, Inc., 522 F.2d 737, 746 (2d Cir.1975) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 424 U.S. 955, 96 S.Ct. 1429, 47
holding no presumption of validity attaches to certificate of renewal holding that although the presumption of correctness applies to the ultimate classification decision  the presumption carries no force as to questions of law recognizing a presumption of reasonableness recognizing this presumption recognizing presumption