is no evidence that, prior to the issuance of the Miranda warnings, while seated in the back seat, Davis was told that he had to remain in the patrol car and could not leave. Davis also was not informed that he was a suspect or that he was under arrest. Moreover, there is no evidence that Davis was physically restrained in any manner while seated in the unmarked patrol car. Davis was not handcuffed. Davis was not ensnared in a locked back seat with no way out of the patrol car. The door handle would have provided an escape, and there was no screen barrier between the front and back seats. The patrol vehicle was parked, not moving, and it was parked “right in front of the store,” not in an isolated, inaccessible area. (P4-724, 707); Cf. U.S. v. Bordeaux, 400 F.3d 548, 558 (8th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>); Burket v. Angelone, 208 F.3d 172, 195 (4th
holding that parked police vehicle could not constitute other traffic holding on habeas review that defendant was not in custody for miranda purposes and reciting among other facts that defendant was transported to a police station for questioning in an unmarked police car which was not equipped with a shield inside the car holding on direct review that defendant was not in custody when he was interviewed by law enforcement officers in a parked police vehicle which was unmarked and unlocked holding that the leaving of the keys in the ignition of an unlocked and unattended vehicle parked on an outdoor lot at night is negligence as a matter of law holding that a defendant who voluntarily rode to the station with officers in a police car waited in a lobby with unlocked external doors and was told more than once he was not under arrest was not in custody