the assent of the offeree. See Power Service Corp. v. Joslin, 175 F.2d 698 (9th Cir. 1949). This assent may be sufficiently expressed by the conduct of the soliciting offeree so as to bring into being a binding contract. Dunkel Oil Corp. v. Independent Oil & Gas Co., 70 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1934); 1 Corbin\ Contracts § 88 (1963). The conduct on the part of the offeree which will constitute assent under these circumstances must be directed towards fulfilling the contractual obligation (that is, beginning performance) and that conduct must be conveyed by the offeree to the offeror. Albright v. Stegeman Motorcar Co., supra. Moreover, the conduct must be by persons who have at least apparent authority to bind the offeree. See O’Daniel Motors, Inc. v. Handy, 390 S.W.2d 453 (Ky. Ct.App.1965) (<HOLDING>) With these principles in mind, the resolution
holding that sales contract for used car which required approval of dealer was not made binding on dealer by delivery of car by salesman who had no authority to bind dealer holding that officers observation of a known drug dealer approaching the defendants car gave rise to reasonable suspicion holding drug addiction admissible to show motive to rob and kill when defendant had the victims car check book and credit cards told his wife and a friend that he had killed the victim in selfdefense sold the car to a drug dealer and used all the money from forged checks credit card cash advances and car sale to purchase and use drugs holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search holding that there was probable cause for arrest where officers knew defendants had recently been with suspected drug dealer officers saw defendants car being maneuvered so as to indicate that surveillance had been detected and when officers approached car defendant attempted to place package under car and then pulled the package back inside the car and closed and locked the car door