after a debtor is granted a discharge. This argument is without merit. Rule 4004 specifies when complaints objecting to discharge may be filed and when the court may grant a discharge; it does not limit the trustee’s ability to administer the estate after discharge or otherwise modify a trustee's duty to collect estate property in a Chapter 7 bankruptcy. See 11 U.S.C. § 704(a)(1) (requiring trustee to “collect and reduce to money the property of the estate”); see also id. § 542(a) (requiring turnover of estate property to trustee); id. § 554(d) (stating that property that is not abandoned or administered remains estate property). 3 . In addition to revoking the debtors’ discharge, the court can impose sanctions for civil contempt. See In re Skinner, 917 F.2d 444, 447 (10th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). In this case, the trustee filed a motion for
holding that civil contempt is designed to coerce the defendant into compliance with the courts order or  compensate the complainant for losses sustained recognizing power of bankruptcy court under  105 of the code and bankruptcy rule 9020 to impose contempt sanctions for violations of automatic stay holding that  105 authorizes bankruptcy courts to impose sanctions for civil contempt to compel compliance with a court order or compensate parties for losses caused by noncompliance holding that section 105a facilitates compliance with the bankruptcy code and the bankruptcy courts orders and compliance is one of the central goals of civil contempt sanctions recognizing power of bankruptcy court to impose sanctions on parties and counsel who willfully abuse the judicial process but not finding sanctions appropriate against debtor and his attorney for their repeated bankruptcy filings