assets was exacerbated by his subsequent efforts to cover up his diversion of these assets and his failure to disclose his receipt, via payments made by other entities on his behalf, of the remainder of his share of the proceeds that were not used to purchase the WSFS claim. The Debtor’s inability or, as this Court determined, his unwillingness to account for estate assets including, inter alia, whether estate assets were used to fund the purchase of the WSFS Claim, also constituted evidence of mismanagement of estate assets. In re PRS Insurance Group, Inc., 274 B.R. 381, 387 (Bankr.D.Del.2001) (appointing trustee where debtor failed to provide an explanation of diversion of funds from entities in which the debtor held an interest); Intercat, Inc., 247 B.R. 911, 923 (Bankr.S.D.Ga.2000) (<HOLDING>); In re Humphreys Pest Control Franchises,
holding corporate officers and board members liable where they were actively engaged in the management supervision and oversight of the corporations affairs holding that a plaintiff must allege more than incompetence or corporate mismanagement before a claim of negligence rises to the level of securities fraud holding that a plaintiff must allege more than incompetence or corporate mismanagement  before a claim of negligence rises to the level of securities fraud recognizing that diversion of substantial corporate assets to the debtors management or to other corporations owned by management constituted mismanagement at best and fraud or dishonesty at worse recognizing that when the corporations management or its shareholders are deadlocked with respect to a particular issue courts have realigned such corporations as party plaintiffs