the amount of $55,196.70, and punitive damages in the amount of $110,393.40. Plaintiffs are further entitled to forfeiture damages against Defendant Fell in the amount of $40,177.00, and punitive damages in the amount of $40,177.00. Defendant Lee is jointly and severally liable for Belliard’s and Fell’s forfeiture damages. All of the remaining claims and counterclaims are dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk shall enter Judgment in accordance with this Opinion. 1 . "STRE” is intended to stand for "Strength” and "UTY” is intended to stand for "Unity.” 2 . This action was originally referred to this Court for general pretrial supervision and Reports and Recommendations on dispositive motions, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A)-(C). 3 , 395 U.S. 653, 89 S.Ct. 1902, 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969) (<HOLDING>)). Likewise, courts that have applied the
holding that the contract doctrine of licensee estoppel was trumped by the federal policy embodied in the patent laws holding that an exclusive license granting the licensor a reversionary interest in the patent in the event of the licensees bankruptcy was a grant of all substantial rights such that the licensee could sue for patent infringement holding that  1338a jurisdiction inures when a complaint establishes that federal patent law creates the cause of action or that the plaintiffs right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substantial question of federal patent law in that patent law is a necessary element of one of the wellpleaded claims holding patent policy incorporated by reference into patent agreement holding action did not arise under the patent laws