alcohol or a drug or while having an alcohol concentration of .08 or more (OWI).” See Iowa Code § 321J.4B(2). Because there was no § 321J.2 violation in connection with this case, § 321J.4B(5)(a) does not apply. We conclude that the district court did not err in denying Betterton’s motion to suppress the evidence obtained from the inventory search. B. Evidence of Prior Convictions The district court denied Better-ton’s motion to exclude evidence of his two prior convictions for possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. We review the district court’s admission of evidence of past crimes under Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) for abuse of discretion, and we will not reverse unless the evidence “clearly had no bearing on the case and was introduced solely to prove the defend h Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). Betterton’s prior convictions, one from 1998
holding two prior convictions for distribution of crack relevant to show intent to distribute the crack found in defendants possession holding that a prior conviction for possession with intent to distribute cocaine is admissible under rule 609 holding prior conviction for possession of methamphetamine relevant to show knowledge and intent for conspiracy to distribute where the defendant claimed he was unaware that another person in the vehicle was distributing methamphetamine holding evidence sufficient to support conviction of intent to distribute based on inter alia 047 grams of methamphetamine divided into five individual packages holding that evidence of a 10yearold drug conviction was properly admitted to show intent in a prosecution for possession with intent to distribute