First Options, 514 U.S. at 946, 115 S.Ct. 1920. Further, the Seventh Circuit has found that party may argue arbitrability to the arbitration panel without losing her right to independent court review. Edward D. Jones & Co. v. Sorrells, 957 F.2d 509, 514 n. 7 (7th Cir.1992); Local 458-3M v. Carqueville Printing Co., No. 91 C 5267, 1992 WL 132854, at *3 (N.D.Ill. May 29, 1992). In this case, Young objected to the arbitrator’s jurisdiction in a motion to dismiss the arbitration. Although that motion was denied, it preserved Young’s objections to the arbitrability of the dispute. Further, even though the arbitration panel in this case attempted to resolve this question, it is the responsibility of the court to make this determination. See First Options, 514 U.S. at 944-45, 115 S.Ct. 1920 (<HOLDING>). In this case there is no express provision in
holding that this court may address an issue not ruled on by the trial court if it presents a question of law and all the facts necessary for its resolution have been presented holding that when the trial court overlooks or fails to rule on an issue the party seeking the courts ruling must remind the court that it has not ruled and obtain a definitiveruling on the issue holding that because the parties agreed to arbitrate and both placed the issue before the arbitrator the issue of consolidation was for the arbitrator holding that even though the arbitrator ruled on the issue of arbitrability it was the responsibility of the court to address that issue de novo holding that an appellate court cannot address on appeal an issue never ruled upon by the trial court