total of seven permits held by Coteau. Coteau is almost constantly in the process of renewal, revision or review of its permits. Delay, denial or suspension of these revisions would clearly cause Coteau serious difficulties in meeting its contractual obligations, if not make it impossible to meet them. Coteau has no power to cause Basin, or entities linked to Basin, to remedy a violation, should one occur. Thus, if Basin or its linkages commit a violation and refuse to remedy it, Coteau could lose its permits indefinitely. The consequences to Coteau of, through no fault of its own, breaching a contract will be irreparable once they have occurred, and a preliminary injunction will ensure that Co-teau suffers no loss during the pendency of this case. See Glenwood Bridge, 940 F.2d at 372 (<HOLDING>). We find that the district court erred in
holding that loss of the opportunity to fairly compete for a contract constitutes irreparable harm holding that the potential loss of valuable business may constitute irreparable harm holding that the lack of control over ones mark creates the potential for damage to  reputation which constitutes irreparable injury for the purpose of granting a preliminary injunction in a trademark case holding that potential loss of a contract constitutes irreparable injury holding potential damage to reputation to constitute irreparable harm