previously sought and allowed; original retainer and balance; that parties have 20 days to object; and that if no objections are filed the Court may enter an order, and if objections are filed the Court may set a hearing. Local Rule 2.016(D). At the time Mr. D D.Mo.1991) (finding the failure to identify services by specific dates is grounds to deny compensation). This Court found that Mr. Desselle’s fee application failed to provide sufficient detail to make an adequate finding that the services were reasonable and necessary. Additionally, Mr. Desselle has already had two bites of the apple because he was provided an opportunity to submit an amended fee application to rectify the objections expressed by the UST. In re Busy Beaver Bldg. Centers, Inc., 19 F.3d 833, 847-48 (3rd Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>). However, Mr. Desselle was unable to
holding that the court should allow an attorney a reasonable time to comply with the specificity requirement of section 330a before denying fees holding that feecap provision in the individuals with disabilities education act applies to both merits time before administrative agency and fees for fees time in court holding that the decision to allow attorney fees rests with the trial judge and that decision may only be reversed for an abuse of discretion holding that a district court may not authorize an attorney to charge fees for representation in court when the commissioner has already authorized that attorney to charge fees for representation in administrative proceedings and declining to reach the secretarys contention that  406b does not allow a court to authorize attorneys fees unless it renders a judgment on the merits favorable to the claimant holding because an award of attorney fees is discretionary court may consider attorney fees in relation to the underlying equities in the case