speedy trial motions that were finally decided by Judge Sheppard. While the nature of this particular case rendered it difficult for the parties and the district court to settle upon a district court judge who was in a position to preside over the matter, we believe that the court, in dealing with the administrative issues that arose, failed to act efficiently and expeditiously in view of the speedy trial-related consequences sure to arise. The State did not go far enough in providing evidence or explanation showing that this case was properly and efficiently managed or showing that the case could not have been managed considerably better for societal purposes and to protect Defendant’s right to a speedy trial. See Spearman, 2012-NMSC-023, ¶ 47 (Daniels, J., specially concurring) (<HOLDING>). Under the circumstances of this case, we
recognizing that societys interest in admitting all relevant evidence militates strongly in favor of permitting reconsideration recognizing that in parental termination proceedings the fundamental liberty interest of parents must be balanced with societys interest in protecting the welfare of children holding that the constitutional right to a speedy trial includes the right to a reasonably prompt sentencing recognizing the need to protect the accuseds right to a speedy trial without sacrificing societys interest in enforcement of its criminal laws recognizing that the accuseds right to be represented by counsel is a fundamental component of our criminal justice system