3 . Some of the statements were made minutes after the shooting while others were made within thirty to forty-five minutes of it. 4 . We seriously question whether the statements Maria made to the investigating officers can be classified as "testimonial” statements under Crawford. It appears that testimonial statements under Crawford have an official and formal quality about them. Here, Maria’s statements were not given in a formal setting; given during any type of pretrial hearing or deposition; contained within a formalized document of any kind; or made under circumstances which would lead an objective person to reasonably believe that the statement would be available for use at a later trial. See Samarron v. State, 150 S.W.3d 701, 705-07 (Tex.App.San Antonio 2004, no pet. h.) (<HOLDING>). Admittedly, Maria gave her statement in
holding neither a phone call by the police requesting an arrestee to come to the station for questioning nor the questioning of an arrestee at the station was a seizure within the meaning of the fourth amendment holding that postmmmda statement knowingly given in response to structured police questioning was testimonial holding statement inadmissible when instead of following section 5202 officers took juvenile first to police station where they obtained signed written statement from him before taking him to appropriate juvenile detention center holding victims statement testimonial where it was elicited in response to structured police questioning pursuant to a police investigation holding witnesss formal signed written statement given at the police station one hour after the crime following structured police questioning was testimonial