the behavior or driving pattern of someone who is intoxicated. Indeed, we agree with Defendant that the act of smoking legal to-baceo and the act of smoking illegal drugs may appear very similar to the uninitiated and that the two acts would not likely be distinguishable by an untrained or inexperienced observer. While the informant indicated that she could smell the odor of the substance the individuals were smoking, we have no indication in the record as to why she believed that the odor she detected was burning drugs as opposed to incense or any other substance. It may well be that Stacy did have experience with identifying the odor of burning narcotics, as she indicated that she had previously worked with the Weber-Morgan Narcotics Strike Force. Nevertheless, we s 0.App.1992) (<HOLDING>). ¶19 Whether an officer's detection of an odor
holding that the smell of burning opium was sufficient to establish probable cause holding that a smell associated with pcp was enough to establish probable cause holding that the smell of alcohol emanating from the defendants vehicle was enough to generate reasonable suspicion holding that although pcp has no odor because streetlevel pcp is mixed with other substances that have a distinct odor an officers recognition of that odor was sufficient to establish probable cause holding that the smell of marijuana gave the police probable cause to search the vehicle