of summary judgment in favor of defendant who allegedly used plaintiff's mark to trigger pop-up advertisements); Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Netscape Commc’ns Corp., 354 F.3d 1020, 1030 (9th Cir.2004) (same); J.G. Wentworth, S.S.C. Ltd. P’ship v. Settlement Funding LLC, No. 06-0597, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 288, at *14-17, 2007 WL 30115, at *5-6 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 4, 2007) (finding that use of trademark in sponsored links is use under the Lanham Act); Buying for the Home, LLC v. Humble Abode, LLC, 459 F.Supp.2d 310, 323 (D.N.J.2006) (denying defendant's motion for summary judgment on plaintiff's trademark infringement claim based on sponsored links); Edina Realty, Inc. v. TheMLSonline.com, No. 04-CV-4371 (JRT), 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13775, at *9-10, 2006 WL 737064, at *3 (D.Minn. Mar. 20, 2006) (<HOLDING>); Gov't Employees Ins. Co. v. Google, Inc., 330
holding that a religious foundation is an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of the fair labor standards act holding that purchase of search terms is a use in commerce holding limited use of a mark did not constitute prior use in commerce sufficient to establish rights in the mark holding that robbery of proceeds intended for purchase of cocaine affected interstate commerce holding that commerce clause authorizes congress to punish any particular criminal action even without proof of a relation to interstate commerce when the activity is part of a class of activities determined by congress to affect interstate commerce