merits of its misappropriation or breach of duty of loyalty claims. The determination that JSG is likely to succeed on its breach of contract claim is sufficient to support a preliminary injunction. 5 . After considering the relevant factors, the court concludes that a bond in the amount of $25,000 is proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. This bond is lower than might otherwise be required because the duration of the preliminary injunction is limited in several respects. If France can show, however, that the bond should be increased, she may move separately for appropriate relief. See, e.g., Gryphon Master Fund, L.P. v. Path 1 Network Techs., Inc., 2007 WL 1723703, at *8 (N.D.Tex. June 14, 2007) (Fitzwater, J.) (<HOLDING>); Olan Mills, Inc. v. Eckerd Drug of Tex.,
holding that by jumping bail and failing to appear the defendant violated the plea agreement and the governments obligation to move for a downward departure based on substantial assistance ended holding that defendant could move separately to have bond increased holding that the state failed to rebut the defendants testimony that he was forced to leave his approved residence and could not reach the probation officer to inform him of his move holding that counsels failure to move to suppress the defendants confession constituted ineffective assistance because it was obvious that the confession would have been suppressed holding that it was improper when prosecutor posed questions to defense counsel that could have been read as posed only to the defendant and whose answers could only have been provided by the defendant