make possible the identification of what is described. Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 9.110 cmt. (Tex. UCC) (Vernon 1991); see Unicut, Inc. v. Texas Commerce Bank-Chemical, 704 S.W.2d 442, 444 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, writ ref’d n.r.e.). While the so-called “serial number” test is no longer in effect, we still must be able to identify the collateral from the description contained in the security agreement. See Tex.Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 9.110 cmt. (Tex. UCC) (Vernon 1991). According to the terms of the agreement between Stephens, Birdwell, and BFI, BFI would pay Stephens and Birdwell a percentage of its revenues from asbestos abatement operations for five years if the two men did not- compete with BFI during that time. This is clea 1970 WL 12552 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.1970) (<HOLDING>); FDIC v. Hill, 13 Mass.App. 514, 434 N.E.2d
holding that the internal revenue service could be required to turn over to bankrupt estate tangible property to which debtor retained ownership holding description all tangible personal property now owned by the debtor or which may hereafter be acquired sufficient to cover equipment holding description all of the goods then owned or to be owned in the future sufficient to cover equipment and vehicles holding that a taxable event has occurred when a manufacturer of tangible personal property uses or consumes items of tangible personal property manufactured by it which product it also sells or installs for a price in the ordinary course of its business at retail holding description all personal property sufficient to cover equipment