debtor’s discharge order was granted and after the deadline had passed for objecting to exemptions (and no party objected to his homestead exemption); chapter 7 case was filed March 20, 2012; the debtor received his discharge on April 25, 2013; then on June 21, 2013, the debtor sold his homestead, netting proceeds of $813,935.77 and the debtor did not reinvest the proceeds within 6 months; trustee filed an adversary proceeding seeking turnover of homestead sale proceeds on April 11, 2014; court held (in the context of debtor motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim) that only closing of the Chapter 7 case, rather than discharge of a debtor, would immunize homestead proceeds from the six-month rule). But see In re D’Avila, 498 B.R. 150, 159-160 (Bankr.W.D.Tex.2013) (J. Davis) (<HOLDING>). 42 . DE # 71 in the Bankruptcy Case. 43 . See
holding that the 1994 amendment to  348 of the bankruptcy code should control in preamendment ongoing cases and that the debtors tort causes of action that accrued while the case was proceeding under chapter 13 did not become property of the estate or subject to the bankruptcy proceedings upon conversion of the case to chapter 7 proceedings holding that facts as they existed on the date of the original bankruptcy petition not on the date of conversion from chapter 13 to chapter 7 bankruptcy applied holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code holding that the texas proceeds rule is only applicable in a chapter 13 bankruptcy case and would not apply where the debtor sells homestead property postpetition in a chapter 7 bankruptcy case holding that notwithstanding a debtors inability to obtain a chapter 13 discharge a debtor is nonetheless eligible to file a chapter 13 case