at 3801 Chestnut. Also found at the residence at the time of Jones’s arrest were three firearms: a semi-automatic .22 pistol loaded with a clip (seized from the dining-room floor), a loaded .357 revolver (seized from a bedroom), and a loaded .38 revolver (seized from the top of a china cabinet in the dining room). All these weapons were found near parts of the residence where drug distributions had occurred. Jones and his cohorts had ready access to these weapons, and even as the police were conducting their search of the residence various individuals seeking to purchase crack cocaine came to the front door with money in their hands. We find that the evidence is not insufficient to support Jones’s § 924(c) conviction. See United States v. Townley, 929 F.2d 365, 368 (8th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Jones also challenges the sufficiency of the
holding that evidence is sufficient for  924c conviction where it shows weapons proximity to drugs and its accessibility holding that trading drugs for a gun violates the in furtherance of prong of  924c holding sufficient to support conviction under  924c evidence of loaded firearm recovered from defendants room during execution of search warrant for drugs holding that a large amount of drugs increases the likelihood of weapons holding that where the record shows defendant was represented by counsel and the conviction is valid on its face the defendant is precluded from attempting to undermine the validity of that conviction by collateral attack