finished article” and the government does not adequately address the application of GRI 2(a) in the context of this matter. The Explanatory Notes (which are not binding) to GRI 2(a) state that GRI 2(a) does not “normally” apply to products of Section VI of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, which includes Chapter 32. 1 Explanatory Notes 2. Ms. Walsh, the Customs officer responsible for classification under heading 3215, conceded that this does not mean “not ever.” Walsh Dep. Tr. 140:3-141:13. Her recollection was of a “shampoo before it [ ] had a color and the fragrance from the manufacturer” added, which was considered “an unfinished shampoo, but it had all the characteristics of a shampoo.” Id. at 140:13-18. Cf. Aceto Chemical Co., Inc. v. United States, 59 CCPA 212, C.A.D. 1069 (1972) (<HOLDING>). Other courts have also apparently determined
holding that the principal is liable for an agents acts committed within the scope of the agents employment holding that coming to work regularly is an essential function holding that even though the complaint was dismissed without prejudice as a sanction for misconduct and even though the order of dismissal was therefore not an adjudication on the merits the defendants were nevertheless properly considered the prevailing party for purposes of attorneys fees holding that an fbi agents rough notes of an interview of the defendant were not brady material because there was no independent showing that they contained evidence that was material to the defendants guilt or innocence holding that an imported unfinished shampoo mixture contained the essential elements that impart the function of shampoo even though water perfume and coloring agents were added after importation