residue on them. Over McDaniel’s objection based on the best evidence rule, the trial court allowed Detective Shea to testify that the envelope was addressed to Michael McDaniel at 318 Catherine Drive. As McDaniel acknowledges in his point on appeal, the State was using the contents of the envelope to show that McDaniel’s belongings were near drug paraphernalia in the home in an effort to strengthen its argument that McDaniel possessed the cocaine found in the bedroom. McDaniel never disputed that the mail was addressed to him at 318 Catherine Drive. Therefore, although the content of the envelope bore on the fundamental issue of whether McDaniel possessed the cocaine in the bedroom, the writing on the envelope was not directly in issue and the best evidence rule did not apply. See id. (<HOLDING>). The trial court did not abuse its discretion
holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in excluding hearsay evidence and evidence that violated the best evidence rule in deciding a summary judgment motion holding that the workproduct doctrine was inapplicable where there was no indication a memorandum was prepared in anticipation of litigation holding that the best evidence rule did not apply to a photograph of a police lineup holding that where the actual content of a 911 tape was never in dispute the best evidence rule was inapplicable holding a compromise to settle the dispute meant there was therefore no actual litigation