Reform Act (PLRA), prisoners are required to exhaust their administrative remedies before initiating an action to vindicate federally protected rights. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) (“No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”). The.exhaustion requirement applies to all claims, including those alleging excessive force. Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 532, 122 S.Ct. 983, 152 L.Ed.2d 12 (2002). Brosh contends he should be excused from the exhaustion requirement because his administrative remedies were unavailable. See Tuckel v. Grover, 660 F.3d 1249, 1252 (10th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). He says he was intimidated from filing a
holding that the electronic submission of information across state lines qualifies as in or affecting interstate commerce internal quotation marks and brackets omitted holding that involuntary transport to a police station for questioning is sufficiently like arrest to invoke the traditional rule that arrests may constitutionally be made only on probable cause internal quotation marks and brackets omitted holding that if and when abuse does occur  it is well within the supervisory powers of the courts of appeals to establish summary procedures and calendars to weed out frivolous claims brackets and internal quotation marks omitted recognizing probable cause as complete defense to a claim of malicious prosecution in new york internal quotation marks and brackets omitted holding that exhaustion requirement may be excused and remedies deemed unavailable when prison officials prevent thwart or hinder a prisoners efforts to avail himself of the administrative remedy brackets and internal quotation  marks omitted