him. Id. (emphasis added). The legislative history indicates that § 426.30 is applicable to the case at bar. It states: Paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) permits a party to default without waiving any cause of action. If the party does not desire to defend the action and a default judgment is taken, it would be unfair if an additional consequence of such default were that all related causes of action the party had would be waived and extinguished. Leg. Comm. Comment-Senate 1971 Addition. Based on the plain language of the statute and the clarity of the legislative history, the Court has no difficulty concluding that the Defendant is not barred by the Californ ourt holds that the contract is unenforceable, and this comports with numerous other courts. See In re Price, 313 B.R. 805 (<HOLDING>); Bowden v. Structured Investments Co., L.L.C.
holding that a debtors  522d1 exemption was invalid when the debtor exempted proceeds from the prepetition sale of the debtors marital home which were paid to a judgment creditor with an attachment on the debtors interest in the home holding that a tax sale conducted after filing of petition in bankruptcy is void holding that sale of debtors pension was void as prohibited by  701c holding that sale of debtors boat was not made in commercially reasonable manner holding that the delivery of the deed following a foreclosure sale was a ministerial act that was not prohibited by the automatic stay