held: It is undoubtedly true that an attorney, by virtue of his employment, has implied authority to incur such expenses as may be reasonable, proper, and necessary to the conduct of his client’s business; and if the attorney advances money for such costs, he is entitled to be reimbursed therefor, separately and apart from his fee for services. Skeen n Peterson, 113 Utah 483, 494, 196 P.2d 708, 713 (1948) (emphasis added); see also Cabrera v. Cottrell, 694 P.2d 622, 624 (Utah 1985) (refusing to allow an award of attorney fees or expenses); Howe v. Professional Manivest, Inc., 829 P.2d 160, 165 (Utah Ct.App ay,” the trial court has considerable discretion is determining which expenses are “actual and necessary.” Cf. Canyon Country Store v. Bracey, 781 P.2d 414, 420 (Utah 1989) (<HOLDING>); Nelson v. Trujillo, 657 P.2d 730, 731 (Utah
holding the word individuals is not the equivalent of the dictionary acts use of the word persons holding that use of word may in utah rule of civil procedure 49 indicates grant of discretion to trial court holding that california rule modeled almost word for word on rule 11 of the federal rules of civil procedure does not allow a pro se attorney litigant to recover sanctions in the form of an award of attorneys fees holding that the use of the word or in a statute indicates that any of the listed alternative methods will suffice holding use of word may generally indicates permissive rather than mandatory intent