L.J. 920, 938 n. 468 (1997); Paul C. Giannelli & Francis A. Gilligan, Prison Searches and Seizures: “Locking” the Fourth Amendment Out of Correctional Facilities, 62 U. Va. L.Rev. 1045, 1089 (1979). 11 .11 Del. C. § 1336(a)(11). 12 . 389 U.S. 347, 360, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967). 13 . Id. at 361, 88 S.Ct. 507 (Harlan, J., concurring). See also U.S. v. McKinnon, 11th Cir., 985 F.2d 525 (1993), cert. denied, 510 U.S. 843, 114 S.Ct. 130, 126 L.Ed.2d 94 (1993) (applying same "reasonable expectation of privacy” test for purposes of Title III of Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act, after which 11 Del. C. § 1336 is patterned). 14 . Id. 15 . See United States v. Clark, 8th Cir., 22 F.3d 799, 801 (1994). 16 . Cf. Ex parte Graves, Tex.App. 1st Dist., 853 S.W.2d 701, 705 (1993) (<HOLDING>). 17 .That Howard was stipulated by the parties
holding that police officer had no reasonable expectation of privacy while in his official capacity he interrogated suspect in jailhouse holding that no reasonable expectation of privacy existed in a prison visitor room where conversations took place between brothers and were surreptitiously recorded by state officials holding that no reasonable expectation of privacy existed in jailhouse conversations held between defendant and alleged accomplice when defendant was or should have been aware of monitoring system since speaker was visible on cell room wall holding that defendant had reasonable expectation of privacy in a hotel room rented by relatives when he had a key to the room and permission to use the room at will holding the defendant lacked any expectation of privacy in his cell so the jailer had the right to inspect anything in his cell