at 1545 (determining that deputy sheriff who used his office and patrol car to prevent police interception of his drug sales to an undercover agent correctly received ah enhancement for abuse of a position of public trust); United States v. Pedersen, 3 F.3d 1468, 1469-72 (11th Cir.1993) (upholding a section 3B1.3 enhancement for police officer who unlawfully used his access to confidential information stored in various government data bases, including the National Crime Information Center, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and the Social Security Administration, to assist a corporation that sold personal background information to employers, investigators, and others and which was a customer of his investigation business); United States v. Claymore, 978 F.2d 421, 423 (8th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>) with Mullens, 65 F.3d at 1566-67 (determining
holding that against her will in the rape statute means without her consent and that the fact that the victim was under the age of consent was sufficient to establish that element holding that excited utterance was proven when evidence showed that a patrol officer saw the victim screaming and waiving her hands when he approached she was crying her dress was ripped and she asked the officer to keep the defendant away from her holding evidence insufficient to support kidnapping in four rapes in which 1 attacker held knife to victim and forced her into car where he raped her 2 assailants forced their way into victims home walked victim through dining room into kitchen put dish towel over her face and raped her 3 attackers forced way into victims apartment one pulled out gun took victim to couch for oral sex then took her into adjoining bathroom raped her and threatened to rip out phone and 4 assailants forced their way into victims apartment at gunpoint put hand over victims mouth walked her toward kitchen and then to bedroom checking first to see if anyone was present and then raped her holding that police officer who raped a thirteenyearold girl whom he had apprehended for curfew violation and fathered her child properly received a section 3b13 enhancement for using his position of trust to detain the victim and his patrol ear in which to rape her holding that a letter written by a thirteenyearold victim two years after her alleged rape was admissible reasoning that the issue of the twoyear delay was one of credibility not admissibility