was a violent felony for purposes of the ACCA. In United States v. Harrimon, our court held that Texas offense was a violent felony under the ACCA because “fleeing by vehicle poses a serious risk of injury to others”. 568 F.3d 531, 536 (5th Cir.2009). The Supreme Court, in Sykes v. United States, subsequently held an Indiana conviction for resisting law enforcement through felonious vehicle flight was a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause, § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2267, 2272, 2277, 180 L.Ed.2d 60 (2011) (noting the Court’s decision is consistent with Harrimon). And, our court has held Sykes did not overrule Harrimon, either explicitly or implicitly. E.g., United States v. Standberry, 546 Fed.Appx. 381, 382, 2013 WL 5976454, at *1 (5th Cir. April 23, 2013) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we are bound by Harrimon. United
holding that the sensible and popular understanding of what a motor vehicle accident entails necessarily involves the motor vehicle being operated as a motor vehicle  holding that negligent supervision is inseparable from the use of the motor vehicle holding a motor vehicle can be a deadly weapon by the manner of its use holding that the statutory definition of motor vehicle is not controlling holding sykes focus on use of motor vehicle did not overrule harrimon