that the trial court may grant a grandparent leave to intervene in a pending suit filed by a party authorized under section 102 of the Family Code to bring an original suit affecting the parent-child relationship. Section 102.004(b), as it existed at the time that Carol and Douglas filed their divorce, provided that: An original suit requesting possessory conservatorship may not be filed by a grandparent or other person. However, the court may grant a grandparent or other person deemed by the court to have had substantial past contact with the child leave to intervene in a pending suit filed by a person authorized to do so under this subchapter. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 102.004(b) (Vernon Supp.2006) (emphasis added); see In re MAM, 35 S.W.3d 788, 790 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2001, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); McCord, 111 S.W.2d at 812 (“It has been held
holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the state to introduce direct evidence of the controlling nature of defendants relationship with the victim holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by allowing the intervention of biological grandparent under section 102004b holding that the trial court did not exceed its discretion under rule 403 by allowing evidence that provided background for the crime charged holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling based only on affidavits holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting such a temporary injunction