reasonable suspicion on its own. Utah courts have repeatedly addressed nervousness as a factor supporting reasonable suspicion and have long downplayed its significance. See, eg., State v. Mendoza, 748 P.2d 181, 184 (Utah 1987); State v. Lafond, 2003 UT App 101, ¶ 15 n. 8, 68 P.3d 1043; State v. Robinson, 797 P.2d 481, 436 (Utah Ct.App.1990) ("In the absence of other, objective facts, we decline to give much weight to an officer's assessment of 'nervousness' due to the subjectivity of that determination."). Similarly, the late hour is not particularly suspicious given the location of the stop on a public highway. See Mendoza, 748 P.2d at 183-84 ("[TJravelers use the interstate highway at all times of the day and night. ..."); State v. Steward, 806 P.2d 213, 216 (Utah Ct.App.1991) (<HOLDING>). Criminal history alone is also "insufficient
holding that officers had reasonable suspicion to stop suspect seen driving late at night only a short distance from the area in which a crime had been committed holding that a car that moved from side to side left the paved portion of the road and weaved over the center of the road created reasonable suspicion of driving while intoxicated holding no reasonable suspicion where only indicia of criminal activity was truck driving on public road late at night holding that defendant was in custody when police questioned him in his bedroom late at night holding road was still a public highway although fifty years had passed since the road was used by the public