organizations. See 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. §§ 2751-2756b; 34 C.F.R. §§ 673.1 and 675.1; 20 U.S.C. §§ 1070a-11 et seq.; 20 U.S.C. § 1070e; and 66 Fed. Reg. 20,440, 20,441 (Apr. 23, 2001). Additionally, the College Board's annual report shows funds received from the Department of Education. See http://www.coIlegeboard.org/pubaff/annrep0Q/annrep00.pfd. 5 We cannot analyze the access and notice rights available to parents and students under the Act without facts in addition to those presented in this record. 6 An older version of 34 C.F.R. § 99.3 provided the definition on which the circuit court relied: The term does not include an individual who has not been in attendance at an educational agency or institution. A person who has applied for admi 80 N.E.2d 374 (Ill. 1997) (<HOLDING>); and Carl v. Board of Regents of Univ. of
holding that there is no statutory deliberative process privilege in arizona and declining to create such a privilege under the common law recognizing privilege holding individuals who had been granted the privilege to enroll were not students between the time such privilege was granted and classes began without any reference to the cfr and the secretarys implementation of the act holding that documents reflecting the department of educations review of a universitys compliance with title iv were covered by the privilege and rejecting the argument that a specific policy judgment is necessary for the privilege to apply because the privilege servesto protect the processes by which governmental decisions as well as policies are formulated holding that production of documents without a claim of privilege waives the right to later claim that privilege