65 . Id. at 956. 66 . Id. at 954. 67 . Hampel v. State, 911 P.2d 517, 521 (Alaska App.1996) (emphasis added) (quoting AS 33.20.010(a)). 68 . State v. McCallion, 875 P.2d 93, 95, 98-99 (Alaska App.1994). 69 . AS 33.20.030; see Smith v. State, Dep’t of Corrections, 872 P.2d 1218, 1226-27 (Alaska 1994); Hill v. State, 22 P.3d 24, 27 (Alaska App.2001). 70 . AS 33.20.050; Briggs v. Donnelly, 828 P.2d 1207, 1208-09 (Alaska App.1992). 71 . See AS 12.55.125(a)(l)-(5) (mandatory 99-year sentence) & AS 33.20.010(a)(2)-(3) (making certain prisoners with multiple felony convictions ineligible for good time). 72 . Malloy I, 46 P.3d at 956. 73 . 785 A.2d 672 (D.C.2001). 74 . Id. at 680. [75] 75. See McMillan v. Pennsylvania, 477 U.S. 79, 81-82, 93, 106 S.Ct. 2411, 2413-14, 2420, 91 L.Ed.2d 67 (1986) (<HOLDING>). [76] 76. Keels, 785 A.2d at 684 (citation
holding that a sentence based on a mandatory minimum was unaffected by amendment 706 to the sentencing guidelines holding that facts that increase mandatory minimum sentences must be submitted to the jury but emphasizing that ruling does not mean that any fact that influences judicial discretion when imposing a sentence within the range prescribed by statute must be found by a jury holding that a sentence below a statutory minimum based on the filing of a substantial assistance motion did not eliminate the otherwise applicable mandatory minimum for purposes of sentence modification under  3582c2 holding that a sentence was based on a mandatory statutory minimum sentence even though it was lowered under another statute holding it permissible to increase a mandatory minimum sentence based solely on facts found by the sentencing judge