whether the employer’s conduct involves a “significant aspect of the employment relationship” or constitutes a “reckless character assassination.” However, a piece-meal interpretation that heavily relies on a judicial determination of each allegation would defeat the purposes underlying an agreement to arbitrate. See Great W. Mortgage Corp. v. Peacock, 110 F.3d 222, 228 (3d Cir.1997) (concluding court will conduct narrow inquiry under FAA in which it decides only if there is agreement to arbitrate and whether that agreement is valid), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 118 S.Ct. 299, 139 L.Ed.2d 230 (Oct. 14, 1997); Prudential Sec. Inc. v. LaPlant, 829 F.Supp. 1239, 1242 (D.Kan.1993) (concluding central purpose of Federal Arbitration Act is to ensure judicial enforc 1447, 1448-50 (9th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); Kauffman v. Chicago Corp., 187 Mich.App. 284,
holding that the fair market value of a lost license fee may be actual damages within the meaning of  504 holding that erisa trustee could rely on pricing through major stock market for the best estimate of the current value of a stock at any given time and citing work of dr malkiel neither fiduciary was required to act on the assumption that the market was overvaluing united holding that a drug manufacturer failed to establish irreparable harm because its claim that it would lose between fifty and seventy percent of its market share upon the introduction of the competing drug on the market was based on mere speculation holding as arbitrable posttermination defamation claim based on statement that stockbroker would probably be out of the stock market business within a year that die might end up in jail    was immoral and unethical   ⅜ and would eventually lose his brokers license holding that a defendants confession did not arise from improper inducement where officers told him that if he provided a truthful statement everything would probably have a little less consequence to it and things would probably go easier internal quotation marks omitted