“[t]o the extent that the parties are asking the court to, in advance of trial, advise them as to what it considers to be the controlling law in the state of Iowa, the court will enter this advisory ruling.” The district court determined Iowa Code section 657.1(2) authorizes Access Energy to assert a comparative fault defense only against Dalar-na’s claim for future damages, if any, awarded in lieu of injunctive relief. We granted Access Energy’s application for interlocutory appeal. II. Standard of Review. Whether Access Energy’s motion is characterized as a motion for summary judgment or, under the former rule, as a motion for adjudication of law points, our review is for correction of errors at law. Iowa R.App. P. 6.907; see also Weber v. Warnke, 658 N.W.2d 90, 92 (Iowa 2003) (<HOLDING>); Fin. Mktg. Servs., Inc. v. Hawkeye Bank &
holding that the law in this circuit is that errors of law are cognizable under rule 60b holding that the misapplication of case law may not be reviewed holding that it is an abuse of discretion to make errors of law or clear errors of factual determination holding under third circuit law that the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion recognizing motions for adjudication of law points were reviewed for errors at law