are not limited to "pecuniary emoluments." Preda v. Nissho Iwai Am. Corp., 128 F.3d 789, 791 (2d Cir.1997) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). The plaintiff was suspended for a week without pay. Thus, she lost wages. While a NOCO official testified that the plaintiff was reimbursed for her lost wages, the official admitted that 11 ceimbursement occurred "some time later." The plaintiff thus may have at least suffered the loss of the use of her wages for a time. This would be sufficient to support a jury's finding that she suffered an adverse employment action. The plaintiff has also presented sufficient facts to show a causal connection between her protected activity and the adverse employment action. "The causal connection needed for proof of a retaliat 769 (2d Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). NOCO asserts that the plaintiff was removed
holding that the passage of only twentyone days between the plaintiffs filing of an eeoc charge and his termination gave rise to an inference of a causal connection between the two events sufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliation holding that a prima facie case of retaliation requires a causal link between the employees protected activity and the employers adverse employment action holding discharge less than two months after plaintiff filed a sexual harassment complaint with management and ten days after filing a complaint with state human rights office provided prima facie evidence of a causal connection between protected activity and retaliation holding that sufficient evidence of causation existed where adverse employment action occurred less than two months after protected activity holding that the employers discharge of the plaintiff four months after the plaintiff filed a discrimination claim is insufficient to establish a prima facie case of retaliatory discharge