and with gross negligence ... describes conduct that ‘by its nature, presents a serious potential risk of injury to another.’ ” Farnsworth, 92 F.3d at 1009 (quoting USSG § 4B1.2, cmt. n. 2.); see also United States v. Lucio-Lucio, 347 F.3d 1202, 1207 (10th Cir.2003) (summarizing Farnsworth as holding “[gjrossly negligent driving while intoxicated self-evidently posed ‘a serious potential risk of physical injury to another’ ”) (quoting USSG § 4B1.2(a)(2)). We see no reason to depart from this interpretation. Finally, Moore does point out that several recent cases have held that DUI offenses are not crimes of violence; however, these cases address very different “crime of violence” definitions. E.g., Leocal v. Ashcroft, — U.S. -, -, -, 125 S.Ct. 377, 379, 382, 160 L.Ed.2d 271 (2004) (<HOLDING>); Lucio-Lucio, 347 F.3d at 1204, 1205-06 (10th
holding dui causing serious bodily injury is not a crime of violence under 18 usc  16 holding that sexual assault of a child qualified as crime of violence under 18 usc  16 holding that kidnapping is a crime of violence which involves a serious potential risk of injury under 18 usc  924 holding that it was a double jeopardy violation to convict and sentence for both dui with serious bodily injury and driving without a valid license with serious bodily injury based on an injury to a single victim holding that the categorical approach applies to the identical definition of crime of violence in 18 usc  16