F.3d 1225, 1231 (7th Cir.1996); GASH Assoc. v. Village of Rosemont, 995 F.2d 726, 728 (7th Cir.1993). The district court’s Rooker-Feldman analysis was erroneous. Madsen is not challenging a state-court judgment, and nothing in his complaint asks the district court to review the final decisions of the state circuit or appellate courts. See Long, 182 F.3d at 555-56; Centres v. Town of Brookfield, 148 F.3d 699, 703 (7th Cir.1998). Instead, Madsen alleges an injury resulting from a conspiracy between DPR officials and private defendants leading to an administrative decision to suspend his license, an allegation that is not barred. See Centres, 148 F.3d at 703; Nesses v. Shepard, 68 F.3d 1003, 1004 (7th Cir.1995); see also Van Harken v. City of Chicago, 103 F.3d 1346, 1348-49 (7th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). Still, the district court did correctly
holding that judicial review of decisions of military correction boards is review of the administrative record conducted under the administrative procedure act holding that where state rules of civil procedure apply to courts of the state they do not apply to adjudicatory proceedings before state agencies holding that although the state regulated and subsidized the nursing homes private parties not state officials made the administrative decisions therefore the decisions could not be treated as state action holding that the federal constitutional right to a jury trial does not apply to decisions to impose consecutive sentences holding that rookerfeldman does not apply to state administrative decisions