after an injury. Section 214(1)(E) establishes the level of benefits for employees whose post-injury employment lasts less than 100 weeks due to no fault of their own. That section provides: § 214. Determination of partial incapacity 1. Benefit Determination. While the incapacity is partial, the employer shall pay the injured employee benefits as follows. E. If the employee, after having been employed at any job following the injury for less than 100 weeks, loses the job through no fault of the employee, the employee is entitled to receive compensation based upon the employee’s wage at the original date of injury. 39-A M.R.S. § 214(1)(E) (emphasis added). [¶ 6] Tyson’s asserts that this provision should be read to prohibit an award of partial incapacity benefits when an em 74 (Me.1991) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 10] We have not had occasion since the
holding that the employers failure to interact with the employee does not preclude the employee from losing on summary judgment because the employee must still prove that a reasonable accommodation could have been made holding that employee was entitled to restoration of partial incapacity benefits despite having been fired for dishonesty citing cases in which the reason for termination is irrelevant if the employee sustained continued incapacity from a compensable injury holding that an atwill employee can be discharged for any reason or no reason unless employee is discharged for reasons that contravene a clear mandate of public policy holding that an employee who claims to have been terminated by her employer for having exercised her right to disability benefits raised a cognizable claim under  510 of erisa notwithstanding the fact that she received the benefits from her employer prior to termination holding that although the plaintiff was a problem employee and eventually may have been terminated for that reason the immediate cause of his termination was the osha report