Deed of Trust and therefore whose rights under these instruments are affected by the filing of the Debtor’s Chapter 13 petition. 6 . In fact, Schedule D identifies an entity called “Homeq Servicing.” As already noted in Finding of Fact No. 6, this is the same entity as Barclays. 7 . The Court concurs that the Debtor’s obligation is to the Morgans under the Second Lien Note because the Debtor never signed the First Lien Note and therefore is not liable to Wells Fargo. Although the Court agrees with the Debtor on this particular point, the Court nevertheless rejects the Debtor’s arguments as to why the stay should be kept in place so that foreclosure on the Property continues to be enjoined. 8 . See also Howell v. Murray Mortg. Co., 890 S.W.2d 78, 87 (Tex.App.—Amarillo 1994, writ denied)(<HOLDING>); Home Sav. of America, F.A. v. South Green
recognizing the test set forth in strickland as clearly established law for aedpa purposes holding that plea in bar may be based only on grounds set forth in statute holding that the 1996 personal restraint petition of an individual committed in 1980 pursuant to an insanity plea was procedurally barred because it was filed after the oneyear time bar set forth in rcw 1073090 and because the grounds for relief did not fall within the exceptions to the limitation period holding that it is generally sufficient that an indictment set forth the offense in the words of the statute itself holding clause was not an undue restraint on alienation for the reasons set forth in sonny arnold