discriminated against by state law including groups identifiable by ethnic, national origin, or linguistic characteristics”); Garcia v. Gloor, 618 F.2d 264, 270 (5th Cir.1980) (“To a person who speaks only one tongue or to a person who has difficulty using another language than the one spoken in his home, language might well be an immutable characteristic like skin color, sex or place of birth”); Manzanares v. Safeway Stores, Inc., 593 F.2d 968, 970 (10th Cir.1979) (recognizing “Spanish speaking or Spanish-surnamed Americans as a minority for purposes of sections 1981, 1983 and 1985(3)”); Smothers v. Benitez, 806 F.Supp. 299 (D.P.R.1992) (discussing equal protection analysis of language based discrimination); Asian Am. Business Group v. City of Pomona, 716 F.Supp. 1328 (C.D.Cal.1989) (<HOLDING>); Saucedo v. Brothers Well Service, Inc., 464
holding ordinance restricting availability of abortion unconstitutional holding that a debtor cannot appeal a confirmation order on the basis that it unfairly discriminates against a class of claims holding unconstitutional a state law which restricted the teaching of foreign languages holding unconstitutional ordinance enacted in reliance on foreign studies which focused only on efficacy of land use and zoning schemes in reducing crime holding that ordinance restricting use of foreign languages on business signs overtly discriminates on the basis of national origin