devoted to the service of mankind at the time and the place in which it is kept. A domestic animal is an animal that is by custom devoted to the service of mankind at the time and in the place in which it is kept. As a matter of law, litigants are entitled to a jury instruction when it is a correct statement of the law and there is some basis in the evidence to support it. Barnes v. Everett, 351 Ark. 479, 95 S.W.3d 740 (2003). However, a trial court’s refusal to give a proffered instruction will not be reversed unless there was an abuse of discretion. Barker v. Clark, 343 Ark. 8, 33 S.W.3d 476 (2000). Here, the restatement-based instruction given by the court is supported in the law and the evidence presented at trial. See Cavaliere v. Skelton, 73 Ark. App. 188, 40 S.W.3d 844 (2001) (<HOLDING>). The Association’s expert, Dr. Gwen Reeder (a
holding that property owner who violated restrictive covenant multiple times over several years waived enforcement of same restriction against third parties as matter of law holding that keeping narcotics openly on display in a private residence was indicative that the residences owner considered a visitor sufficiently complicit to allow him a full view holding that a restrictive covenant with worldwide restrictions on competition is not reasonable holding that a restrictive covenant with a tenyear term was unenforceable holding that a couple keeping bengal tigers at their residence violated a restrictive covenant that only allowed the keeping of household pets