35-50-2-6(a) (Burns Code Ed. Repl.2004) provides that a person who is convicted of a Class C felony shall be imprisoned for a fixed term of four years, with not more than four years added for aggravating circumstances or not more than two years . subtracted for mitigating circumstances. 8 . Welch makes no claim that two of the prior felony convictions relied upon by the trial court to enhance his sentence also supported his habitual offender enhancement. The felonies which supported the habitual offender finding could not standing alone be relied upon as the aggravating factor of a prior criminal record to enhance the sentence. See . McVey v. State, 531 N.E.2d 458, 461 (Ind. 1988); Darnell v. State, 435 N.E.2d 250, 256 (Ind. 1982). But see Jones v. State, 600 N.E.2d 544, 548 (Ind.1992) (<HOLDING>). Regardless, aside from the two felony
holding that a defendant sentenced as an habitual offender who later successfully challenges one of his predicate offenses may have his habitual offender status and sentencing enhancement vacated through postconviction relief or a motion to correct erroneous sentence holding that it is permissible for a trial court to consider the same prior offenses for both enhancement of the instant offense and to establish habitual offender status holding our habitual offender act does not limit enhancement to prior felony convictions within a certain time holding that under the 1991 version of the habitual offender statute defendant could not receive habitual offender sentence for life felony holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in not allowing defendant to present evidence of his subjective belief regarding his status as habitual offender because his belief was irrelevant to offense of driving as habitual offender