that Diaz had been subjected to adverse changes in work conditions as well, upon return from active duty with the Army Reserves. First, he lost substantial privileges of rank, in that he was assigned a work station, with no desk or chair, in a cubicle filled with boxes and office supplies. On four occasions in 1991 alone, either before or dur ing military leaves, his desk and belongings were relocated apart from all his co-workers. In early 1992, Diaz, alone among his coworkers, was provided with no telephone whatsoever. Second, Diaz’ job responsibilities had been reduced to the point that by early 1992 all his work duties had been assigned to others. Thus, for five consecutive weeks during this period, Diaz was given no work duties at all. Cf. Agosto-de-Feliciano, 889 F.2d at 1219 (<HOLDING>); compare Township of Falls, 890 F.2d at 618
holding that reduction in work duties must extend beyond a week or two before it will be considered sufficiently severe to be actionable in first amendment political discrimination context holding that in the first amendment employment context harassing speech must constitute constructive adverse employment action to be actionable holding that an argument not raised before the bankruptcy court will not be considered for the first time on appeal holding that a claim not raised before the trial court will not be considered for the first time on appeal holding that homosexual advances by male coworker were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to be actionable