District Court ... or have the claim determination reviewed by ... administrative process ... Any suit (or motion to renew a suit filed prior to the appointment of the receiver) must be brought by the claimant within 60 days after the denial of the claim. H.R.Rep. No. 101-54(1), 101st Cong., 1st Sess., reprinted in 1989 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 86, 214 (emphasis added), quoted in In re Federal Deposit Ins. Corp., 762 F.Supp. 1002, 1005 (D.Mass.1991). It is important to note that the court’s interpretation of §§ 1821(d)(6)(A) and (B) as requiring a motion to renew or reactivate within the 60-day period is consistent with the practice of staying or suspending cases pending completion of administrative review. See, e.g., Guidry, et al v. RTC, 790 F.Supp. 651, 653, 654 (E.D.La.1992) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, the court believes that §§
holding refusal to turn over property seized prepetition constituted violation of stay once notice of the stay had been given recognizing implied 180day stay holding judgment in violation of automatic stay void holding dismissal is not precluded by bankruptcy stay holding that insurance guarantee association stay statute did not suspend limitation period because action was not pending when stay was entered