inmate is eligible for 12 months in a RRC. See Krueger v. Martinez, 665 F.Supp.2d at 480. In relevant part, the statute provides generally for prerelease custody: 18 U.S.C. § 3624(c)(1). The authority to provide for prerelease custody includes the authority to “place a prisoner in home confinement for the shorter of 10 percent of the term of imprisonment of that prisoner or 6 months.” See id. at § 3624(c)(2). The 6 months of home confinement is not additional to the 12 months of prerelease custody. Accordingly, the BOP’s determination, at 17 to 19 months before Stanko’s projected release, cannot be considered to be after his period of prerelease custody could begin. His claim was without merit, so it was properly dismissed. See Erie Telecomm. v. Erie, 853 F.2d 1084, 1089 (3d Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). The Director of the Bureau of Prisons shall,
holding we may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even those not relied upon by the district court holding that we may affirm on an alternative basis supported by the record holding that a district courts ruling may be upheld on an alternative ground supported by the record holding that an appellate court may affirm the result reached by a district court on alternative grounds recognizing this court may affirm for any reason supported by the record