bank and whether they were armed. When the officers encountered Ward and Roller, the suspects were not wearing uniforms and, at first blush, did not appear to have legitimate business within the bank. It was a reasonable assessment from the officers’ perspective to point their weapons at the individuals and to handcuff them in order to lead them out of the bank so that the officers could sweep the bank. Although neither Ward nor Roller attempted to flee the scene or resist the officers’ orders, the offic rule on how long a detention may be before it is transformed into an arrest, instead holding that courts should determine whether, given the totality of the circumstances, the detention was unreasonable. United States v. Sharpe, 470 U.S. 675, 686, 105 S.Ct. 1568, 84 L.Ed.2d 605 (1985) (<HOLDING>). Reasonableness depends on whether “the police
holding that a seventyfive minute terry stop was reasonable holding in the alternative that even if handcuffing a suspect did convert the detention into an arrest the arrest was justified by probable cause holding a fourth amendment terry detention is not a custodial arrest and the use of handcuffs does not automatically convert a temporary detention into a fourth amendment arrest holding ninety minute detention of luggage awaiting arrival of trained narcotics dog unconstitutional holding that 20 minute detention under the circumstances of the ease was not arrest