money entrusted to him, knowing that it is the client's money and knowing that the client has not authorized the taking." In re Noonan, 102 N.J. 157, 160, 506 A2d 722 (1986). Misappropriation includes "not only stealing, but also unauthorized temporary use for the lawyer's own purpose, whether or not he derives any personal gain or benefit therefrom." In re Wilson, 81 N.J. 451, 455 n. 1, 409 A.2d 1153 (1979). The PDJ and Hearing Board found that Jaramillo's retention of some portion of the Hernandez funds and the $2,000 of Hill-man's funds was knowing conversion. See Varallo, 913 P.2d at 11; People v. Silvola, 915 P.2d 1281, 1284 (Colo.1996){finding that misconduct that occurred over an extended period of time must be deemed to be willful); People v. Singer, 897 P2d 798, 801 (Colo.1995)(<HOLDING>). Disbarment is the presumed sanction for
holding that attorneys reliance on district court rules of procedure in filing an appeal constitutes inexcusable neglect holding that the states failure to object to a late petition for appeal of a termination order granted by the trial court on the basis of excusable neglect constituted a waiver of the states right to contest excusable neglect on appeal to the court of appeals holding state constitutional guarantee against cruel and unusual punishment is more extensive than federal constitutional standard holding that failure to accurately calculate the thirtyday appeal period is not excusable neglect holding that extensive and prolonged neglect is considered willful misconduct