are provided for as "lamps,” a provision which does not include a requirement as to material, one need not examine the tariff provisions for each of the components of which they are constructed, any more than one would examine such provisions with the motor vehicle.... Pl.’s Reply Brief at 6-7. 21 . As discussed in section III.A above, however, Explanatory Note 70.13 expressly excludes from classification under heading 7013 "[l]amps and lighting fittings and parts thereof of heading 94.05.” See Explanatory Note 70.13. Thus, because the four pieces of merchandise in dispute are prima facie classifiable under heading 9405, they cannot be classified under heading 7013. See also n. 15, supra (discussing effect of Note 1(e) to Chapter 70). 22 . Cf. Bauer Nike Hockey, 393 F.3d at 1252-53 (<HOLDING>); Midwest of Canon Falls Inc. v. United States,
holding that pursuant to gri 3a relative specificity analysis htsus provision which covered merchandise when viewed as a unit is more specific than provision covering glassware of a kind used for  indoor decoration which only describes a portion of the item holding eo nomine tariff provision covering vanity cases to be more specific than tariff provision covering articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag holding that a specific statutory provision prevails over a more general one holding wills more specific provision prevails over general provision holding htsus provision covering ice hockey  articles and equipment to be much more specific than htsus provision which refers quite broadly to other garments of manmade fibers