the young.” Darryl H. v. Coler, 801 F.2d 893, 902 (7th Cir.1986). In addition, the fiscal and administrative burdens entailed with any additional procedures would be excessive. To force IPS to provide actual notice of the opportunity for a hearing to those employees faced with discharge would, in essence, be asking a government entity to sacrifice the efficiency of its operations to factors as trivial as the holiday and travel plans of those with whom it has a duty to correspond. It was incumbent upon Atkins to keep IPS apprised of his current mailing address, and he cannot now be heard to complain because his employer ) (finding that judge waived right to a hearing after he declined the opportunity for one); Suckle v. Madison General Hospital, 499 F.2d 1364, 1367 (7th Cir.1974) (<HOLDING>). Count II is dismissed. 3. Counts III, IV, V
holding that physician discharged from staff of hospital was not entitled to a hearing because he could not secure a right which he declined when it was voluntarily offered to him holding the defendant was not under arrest when police asked him to go to the station and then offered him a ride because he did not have transportation holding that the defendant was placed in official detention when two police officers approached him and told him that he was under arrest as the defendant could not reasonably have believed that he was free to leave holding petitioner cannot claim he was denied right to assistance of counsel when he knowingly and voluntarily decided to represent himself holding that plaintiff could not show that he was disabled because he conceded that he could do his job despite his impairment