extend coverage. 324 Md. at 60, 595 A.2d 469. The court also made clear that while the policy definition of “bodily injury” includes sickness and disease, “bodily injury” also includes damage to the body which may be detectable only on a subelinical or microscopic level. See id. at 60-61, 595 A.2d 469 (citing cases for the proposition that “nothing in the policy language expressly requires that the injury be diagnosed or identified within [the policy] period, or that the injur J. 437, 478-79, 650 A.2d 974 (N.J.1994) (adopting the continuous-trig ger theory for activating insurers’ obligation to respond in the context of progressive indivisible injury resulting from exposure to asbestos products); J.H. France Refractories Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., PMA 534 Pa. 29, 626 A.2d 502 (Pa.1993) (<HOLDING>); Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood, 209
holding that all stages of asbestosis disease process were bodily injury triggering insurers obligation to indemnify holding that rule 43aentitles a defendant to be present at all stages of his trial and that cjommunication between the judge and the jury or a single juror is one of those stages holding that the fatal injury to a murder victim may be considered as satisfying the bodily injury component of the capital felony of kidnapping with bodily injury holding that the defendant is entitled to be present at all stages of his trial  and a judges response to a note from the jury is one of those stages holding that the policys exclusion of coverage for any obligation of the insured to indemnify another because of damages arising out of such bodily injury operates where the genesis of the action is an employees workrelated bodily injury quoting national union fire ins co 906 f2d at 200