followup’ ” in which the officers visited the defendant's apartment and “told him they were following up on a burglary he had reported two years earlier” when the officers in fact were targeting the defendant in an investigation into child pornography); Krause v. Commonwealth, 206 S.W.3d 922, 924-28 (Ky. 2006) (stating that, in a case involving an officer who intended to search for drugs but invented a story that "a young girl had just reported being raped by [defendant’s roommate] in the residence” and “asked if he could look around in order to determine whether her description of the residence and its furnishings was accurate,” "[t]he use of this particular ruse simply crossed the line of civilized notions of justice”); Butler v. Compton, 158 Fed.Appx. 108, 109, 111 (10th Cir. 2005) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Soto, 124 Fed.Appx. 956, 961
holding that the trial court did not err in charging the jury that the defendant was in the custody of the victim officer when he shot and killed the officer due to the undisputed evidence presented at trial including the defendants pretrial statement to police admitting that fact holding that since the officer was entitled to order defendant out of the car he was equally entitled to open the door to accomplish that object holding entry was justified where police knew of prior history of domestic violence between the defendant and his livein girlfriend a neighbor reported hearing an argument a woman scream and then silence no one responded when the officer knocked at the door and when the defendant finally appeared he was unresponsive to questions and refused to say where his girlfriend was holding that the encounter between an officer and the defendant did not rise to the level of a terry stop until the defendant gave the officer his license and the officer informed the defendant that he was going to be given a patdown holding that the plaintiff has set forth a cognizable claim that the officer violated his fourth amendment right when the officer knocked on the plaintiffs motel door and replied that he was maintenance and that he was there to fix the sink