primary duties consist of teaching, spreading the faith, church governance, supervision of a religious order, or supervision or participation in religious ritual and worship,” the First Amendment precludes judicial resolution of the dispute. Rayburn, supra, 772 F.2d at 1168-69 (citing Bagni, supra, 79 Colum.L.Rev. at 1545). Cases in both the federal system and our own courts indicate that when an employee engages in “ministerial functions” for the employer, courts may not exercise jurisdiction over a suit to enforce the employment agreement. Minker, supra, 894 F.2d at 1356-58; Natal, supra, 873 F.2d at 1578; Rayburn, supra, 772 F.2d at 1168, 1171-72; Southwestern Baptist, supra, 651 F.2d at 283-85; see Little, supra, 929 F.2d at 947-48; cf. Chavis, supra, 93 N.J. at 112, 459 A.2d 674 (<HOLDING>). Those cases rely on the sound proposition
holding that removal proceedings are in the nature of process and defects in the removal procedures are waivable holding that the court of claims did not have jurisdiction over plaintiffs first amendment claim of improper removal recognizing congress clear intention to restrict removal and to resolve all doubts about the propriety of removal in favor of retained state court jurisdiction recognizing that first amendment provides qualified right of access to judicial documents holding that first amendment precludes judicial inquiry into propriety of removal procedures followed in defrocking of deacon