profit from that mark.” 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1). Thus, registering a domain name that incorporates a trademark for which only the mark owner could have a legitimate use could be sufficient under Calder to support the assertion of personal jurisdiction in the mark owner’s place of residence. 3 . The Internet searches were conducted on the "Google” search engine located at http://www.google.com. 4 . It is unclear whether "Stang” is a registered Ford trademark. Ford asserts, however, that it has used the term as a mark for many years and that, even if not registered, the mark is entitled to protection. 5 . Analogous permissible uses of trademark names are well established in intellectual property law. See, e.g., Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Church, 411 F.2d 350, 352 (9th Cir.1969) (<HOLDING>); Hypertherm Inc. v. Precision Prods., Inc.,
holding that 350 million dollars expended in advertising the mark three billion units bearing the mark having been sold and the units bearing the mark having been sold in all fifty states and throughout the work supported a finding that hot wheels was famous holding limited use of a mark did not constitute prior use in commerce sufficient to establish rights in the mark holding that independent mechanic who specializes in repairing volkswagens may us volkswagen mark in advertising just not in a manner that suggests he is a part of volkswagens organization holding that putative employers control over result but not manner in which work was performed is factor that weighs in favor of independent contractor status holding that the essential wrong of trademark infringement the appropriation of the good will of anothers established mark may be effectively accomplished by advertising matter associating that others distinguishing mark with the product of defendant