the description, knew the exact location of the residence and led the officers to the residence to serve the search warrant. In addition, the exact address of the residence was contained in the affidavit, and the affiant, Detective Judy, participated in the execution of the search warrant by, among other things, serving the warrant on Dost. See eg., United States v. Gitcho, 601 F.2d 369 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 871, 100 S.Ct. 148, 62 L.Ed.2d 96 (finding warrant sufficient although only description of location to be searched was incorrect street address, it was unlikely wrong premises would be searched because incorrect address did not exist and agents executing warrant personally knew location to be searched); see also, State v. Dye, 250 Kan. 287, 826 P.2d 500 (1992) (<HOLDING>). We additionally note a related matter
holding that a search warrant is invalid if not based on an affidavit holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant holding that search warrant which was lacking sufficient description of premises and did not have affidavit attached was not fatally defective when read together with affidavit and when one of officers executing warrant was affiant holding allegation that false affidavit was basis for arrest warrant is sufficient to state  1983 fourth amendment claim against affiant officer holding that search warrant was constitutionally defective because it did not require notice