implied warranty claims, while Nelda argues the limitations period for her common law implied warranty claim is four years because it is a construction claim. In Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. Barnes, 741 S.W.2d 349 (Tex.1987), the Texas Supreme Court recognized that “consumers of services do not have the protection of a statutory or common law implied warranty scheme.” Id. at 353. Thus, the Court considered for the first time “whether the protection of Texas consumers requires the utilization of an implied warranty that repair services of existing tangible goods or property will be performed in a good and workmanlike manner as a matter of public policy.” Id. After discussing the public policies favoring such a warranty, the Court 2d 716, 719 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Foreman v. Pettit Unlimited, Inc., 886 S.W.2d
holding statute of limitations for dtpa action including claim for breach of express or implied warranty under the dtpa is two years holding plaintiff had to commence his breach of implied warranty action under the dtpa within two years because tjhis special statute of limitations denies plaintiffs alternative proposal of entitlement to recover for breach of the common law implied warranty holding that passenger cannot maintain action for breach of implied warranty to provide safe passage holding that an implied warranty to perform services in a good and workmanlike manner is an action available under the dtpa and is subject to the twoyear limitations provided by the dtpa holding that because the dtpa is the only way of pursuing an implied warranty claim for repairs to existing tangible goods such a claim must necessarily be brought within the twoyear dtpa limitations period