inter alia., insurance to cover the state or its agencies from liability in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action and from court-awarded attorney’s fees in other proceedings against the state. See Fla. Stat. § 284.30; see also Gamble v. Florida Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Serv., 779 F.2d 1509, 1516 (11th Cir.1986). As to the Tribe’s claims that may fall outside of § 284.30, Florida law provides that neither the state nor its state agencies shall pay any monetary damages under the judgment of any court except pursuant to an appropriation made by law. See Fla. Stat. § 11.066. Moreover, because the Florida Commission submits its budget to the Florida legislature for approval, the state would be responsible for the Commission’s debts, such as court judgments. See Fouche, 713 F.2d at 1521 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, Florida would be responsible for
holding plaintiff responsible for attorney error holding that the state would presumably be responsible for any debts incurred because the park authority submits its budget to the georgia legislature holding that since the building authority act does not authorize the creation of any debts by the state the debt limitations clause  does not apply to the authoritys debts or any obligations of the state on its lease agreements with the authority holding that the legislature did not intend the state to be bound by local zoning regulations when constructing a communications tower because the legislature neither named the state nor manifested an intention that it be bound by the provisions of the enabling act which granted zoning authority to the city holding that in order for there to be state debt in the constitutional sense one legislature in effect must obligate a future legislature to appropriate funds to discharge the debt created by the first legislature