jurisdiction after the county court certified the following questions to be of great public importance pursuant to rule 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure: Is a defendant entitled to inspect and copy and potentially use at trial or hearing the operator’s manuals, maintenance manuals and schematics of the intoxilyzer? Assuming the answer to the above question is yes, is the appropriate remedy exclusion of the breath test for the state’s failure to provide such documentation? Under rules 9.030(b)(4)(A) and 9.160, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, this court has discretionary review of non-final orders of a county court containing a question certified to be of great public importance. Such is the case here. See also State v. Slaney, 653 So.2d 422, 424 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (<HOLDING>). Under rule 9.160(f)(1), once this court
holding that filing of appeal to federal circuit divests this court of jurisdiction to consider motion to stay court order pending appeal holding that when a court of appeals has jurisdiction on interlocutory appeal the scope of appellate review is not limited to the precise question certified by the district court because the district courts order not the certified question is brought before the court holding district court of appeal has jurisdiction to entertain states appeal from a nonfinal order of the county court certified to be of great public importance holding that there was appellate jurisdiction under principle that a premature notice of appeal from a nonfinal order may ripen into a valid notice of appeal if a final judgment has been entered by the time the appeal is heard and the appellee suffers no prejudice holding that since district court of appeal properly found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a 3850 motion during the pendency of a direct appeal the district court of appeal should have vacated the order rather than affirming on the merits