may actually be an unknown creditor, it is undisputed that'Capstone received actual notice of the pendency of Power’s bankruptcy petition. This satisfies even the more onerous due process notice requirements to known creditors. Capstone does not dispute that it received actual notice, but rather argues that because Capstone was not aware of any possible defect in Power’s work at the time Capstone received notice, Capstone was unable to protect its rights. Therefore, discharge of Capstone’s claims would deprive Capstone of its due process rights. Nevertheless, the Fifth Circuit recently held that claimants are not deprived of due process even where, at the time they receive notice of the bankruptcy proceeding, they are unaware of any injury. See generally Placid Oil, 753 F.3d 151 (<HOLDING>). In Placid Oil, the harmful conduct and
recognizing cause of action for wrongful death holding that cause of action for asbestosis accrues upon discovery of disease not at time of exposure to asbestos holding that a debtors publication in a newspaper of national circulation satisfied due process requirements for discharge where decedent and claimants in a wrongful death action were unaware of asbestos exposure and resulting mesothelioma at the time notice was published recognizing cause of action for wrongful discharge holding that new statute which required proof that asbestos exposure was substantial contributing factor to claimants medical condition could be applied to pending cases and did not abrogate claimants vested right because she was still able to pursue her cause of action and recover for injury caused by her husbands exposure to asbestos statute merely affected methods and procedure by which that action was recognized protected and enforced not the cause of action itself