he has not shown that he was prejudiced. Accordingly, for all of the foregoing reasons, we affirm PepeFrazier’s convictions. Judgment affirmed. Doyle, P. J., and Miller, J., concur. 1 See, e.g., Muse v. State, 323 Ga. App. 779, 780 (748 SE2d 136) (2013). 2 Id. We note that the evidence was sufficient to sustain Pepe-Frazier’s convictions, though he makes no argument as to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal. See id.; see also OCGA § 16-5-46 (c) (“Aperson commits the offense of trafficking a person for sexual servitude when that person knowingly subjects another person to or maintains another person in sexual servitude or knowingly recruits, entices, harbors, transports, provides, or obtains by any means another person for the purpose of sexual servitude. (674 SE2d 280) (2009) (<HOLDING>); Johnson, 328 Ga. App. at 707 (2) (holding
holding that admission of prior statement constituted error but was harmless when other admissible evidence established the same fact holding error in admission of evidence is harmless when it was merely cumulative to other evidence in the record holding that admission of hearsay was harmless where strong circumstantial evidence established the same facts holding that admission of hearsay constituted harmless error when there was more than sufficient other evidence in the record to support the verdict holding that admission of hearsay testimony was harmless where the jury heard admissible testimony from three other sources to the same effect