(9) as including “actual or simulated -” (A) sexual intercourse, including sexual contact in the manner of genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal contact ...; sexual contact means the intentional touching, either directly or through clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of any person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, degrade, or arouse or gratify sexual desire of any person; ... 18 U.S.C. § 3509(a)(9). 30 . Petitioner asserts that In re Rodriguez-Rodriguez has been overruled by In re Crammond, 23 I. & N. Dec. 9 (BIA 2001). The BIA's decision in Crammond, however, was subsequently vacated, In re Crammond, 23 I. & N. Dec. 179 (BIA 2001)(en banc), and then overruled by IN RE SMALL, 23 I. & N. Dec. 448 (BIA 2002)(en banc)(<HOLDING>). 31 . In Rodriguez-Rodriguez, .22 I. & N. Dec.
holding that taking indecent liberties with a child under 16 for sexual gratification constitutes sexual abuse of a minor even without physical contact recognizing that estradaespinoza and medinavilla set out two different generic federal definitions of sexual abuse of a minor  and looking to both definitions to determine whether conviction under calpenal code  2615d qualifies as generic federal crime of sexual abuse of a minor under categorical approach holding defendants prior conviction for assault related to sexual abuse of a minor even though it did not require an act of sexual abuse because it required intent to commit sexual abuse  and such a mens rea demonstrate the offense was one relating to sexual abuse holding that the new york misdemeanor offense of sexual abuse of a minor constitutes an aggravated felony under ina  101a43asexual abuse of a minor recognizing the two distinct generic definitions of sexual abuse of a minor and holding that a statute contains the element of abuse under the medinavilla definition if it applies to sexual conduct with children younger than fourteen years