to him because his relationship with the plaintiff was a tenancy at sufferance. Id. at 574. We disagreed, holding that when the tenancy at sufferance follows “the termination of a conventional leasehold relationship,” RSA chapter 540-A applies. Id. at 575, 576. We explained that when the legislature enacted RSA chapter 540-A, it intended to “remove[ ] the landlord’s common law right to self-help in evicting a residential tenant whose tenancy at sufferance was preceded by a different leasehold tenancy.” Id. at 575. We observed that RSA 540-A:2 generally prohibits a residential landlord from attempting to “circumvent lawful procedures for eviction pursuant to RSA 540,” and that RSA chapter 540 applies to tenancies at sufferance. Id.; see AIMCO Props. v. Dziewisz, 152 N.H. 587, 589 (2005) (<HOLDING>). “Therefore, when RSA 540-A:2 . . . forbids a
holding that current version of rsa chapter 540 applies to tenancies at sufferance recognizing that belanger applies to debtors who are current on a loan holding that a landlords acceptance of rent turned a trespasser to a tenant at sufferance holding that alabamas version of the uccja applies to temporary custody orders holding that a statute of limitations defense raised for the first time during trial was waived construing a previous version of federal rule of criminal procedure 12 that was not substantively different from the current version