between scope of review and standard of review is the following: "Scope of review” and "standard of review” are often — albeit erroneously — used interchangeably. The two terms carry distinct meanings and should not be substituted for one another. "Scope of review” refers to "the confines within which an appellate court must conduct its examination.” In other words, it refers to the matters (or "what”) the appellate court is permitted to examine. In contrast, "standard of review” refers to the manner in which (or "how") that examination is conducted. In Coker [,] we also referred to the standard of review as the "degree of scrutiny” that is to be applied. Morrison, 646 A.2d at 570 (citations omitted). 6 . Compare DiMonte v. Neumann Medical Center, 751 A.2d 205 (Pa.Super.2000) (<HOLDING>) with Commonwealth v. DeBooth,, 379 Pa.Super.
holding that the record must reflect both that the district judge considered the defendants argument and that the judge explained the basis for rejecting it holding that when determining the adequacy of a jury charge an appellate court should look to the record and the closing arguments to place the words of the judge in context holding that a defendant was not entitled to a relief under section 2255 when he asserted that the sentencing judge who was not the trial judge was influenced by the sentence imposed by the trial judge on a codefendant holding that despite untimely objections the plaintiff was entitled to an evidentiary hearing to present record evidence that during proceedings the trial court judge allegedly talked on a telephone on numerous occasions stood on a table to adjust the air conditioning left the courtroom during video testimony by the plaintiffs expert and the plaintiffs closing argument and acted in other ways that demonstrated to the jury that the judge was indifferent to the plaintiffs case holding that the judge must allow the attorneys the opportunity to be heard on an initial 3850 motion in a capital case for the purpose of determining whether an evidentiary hearing is required and to hear legal argument relating to the motion