action to proceed. Finally, finding no reason for delay, the trial court ordered entry of final judgment with respect to the order dismissing the challenge to the election result. See V.R.C.E 54(b). II. Whether the trial court properly applied the fifteen-day limitations period of 17 V.S.A. § 2603(c) to the federal claims presents an interesting question, but not one that the Court must decide in this matter. The United States Supreme Court has held, to be sure, that a single state statute of limitations applies to “all § 1983 claims,” and that the most appropriate limitations period is that applicable to personal injury actions. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 275, 280 (1985). The high court has reaffirmed this rule on several occasions. See Felder v. Casey, 487 U.S. 131, 143 (1988) (<HOLDING>); Burnett v. Grattan, 468 U.S. 42, 54-55 (1984)
recognizing district court application of the same rule holding that application of 120day noticeofclaim rule to  1983 actions was incompatible with the compensatory goals of the federal legislation holding the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the actions of the federal government holding that in actions brought under 42 usc  1983 federal courts apply the states statute of limitation for personal injury holding that preclusion rules apply in 1983 actions