See State v. Sigler, 967 So.2d 835, 844 (Fla. 2007). However, aggravated assault with a firearm requires a finding that the defendant actually used the firearm while robbery with a firearm requires only that the defendant carried a firearm. State v. Baker, 452 So.2d 927, 928-29 (Fla.1984), reaffirmed, Taylor v. State, 608 So.2d 804 (Fla.1992). While the evidence may have established that Williams used the firearm by turning it on Ghent, the charging document did not allege that Williams used the firearm. And while the jury’s verdict for attempted robbery with a firearm satisfies the element of carrying a firearm, this does not establish that the jury found the essential element of aggravated assault that Williams used a firearm. See Coicou v. State, 39 So.3d 237, 243-44 (Fla.2010) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we reverse the conviction for
holding that where jury was instructed on both a greater offense and lesserincluded offense and the jury convicted on the lesserincluded offense the double jeopardy provision prohibited retrial on the greater offense holding that counsel was not ineffective in failing to request a charge on the lesserincluded offense when the evidence showed either the commission of the completed offense as charged or the commission of no offense such that the defendant was not entitled to a charge on the lesser offense holding that it was error to direct entry of a conviction for a permissive lesserincluded offense based on the fact that it was supported by the evidence because the greater crime was not charged in a manner that encompassed the intent element of the permissive lesserincluded offense and the jury did not make a finding regarding that intent element holding that guilty verdict in first trial on what was submitted as second lesserincluded offense despite its not having been lesserincluded offense as matter of law precluded subsequent prosecution for what had been charged as greater offenses in first trial holding that indecency with a child by contact is lesserincluded offense of aggravated sexual assault of a child because even though the latter offense did not include intent as an express element lascivious intent was implicitly included