benefits. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment below and remand this case to the Board for a decision consistent with this opinion. Judgment reversed. Andrews, P. J., and McMillian, J., concur. Decided August 23, 2013. Margaret L. Kinnear, for appellant. Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, Nelson, Mullins, Riley & Scarborough, Neeru Gupta, for appellees. 1 See OCGA § 34-8-194 (2) (A). 2 Teal v. Thurmond, 310 Ga. App. 312, 313 (713 SE2d 436) (2011) (citation omitted); see OCGA § 34-8-223 (b). 3 Solinet v. Johnson, 280 Ga. App. 227, 228 (633 SE2d 626) (2006) (punctuation omitted). 4 Id. 5 See OCGA § 34-8-194 (2) (A). 6 See OCGA § 34-8-194 (2) (B) (i), (ii). 7 Millen v. Caldwell, 253 Ga. 112, 113 (317 SE2d 818) (1984); see also Williams v. Butler, 322 Ga. App. 220, 7 SE2d 875) (1989) (<HOLDING>). In its brief, the District argues that our
holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired holding that plaintiff could not establish a prima facie case of discrimination because she was unable to present evidence that she was qualified for the position holding that a teacher was qualified for unemploymentcompensation benefits after she failed a certification test three times in one year when there was no evidence suggesting she did not engage in her best efforts holding that a teacher was qualified for unemploymentcompensation benefits when she made bona fide efforts to pass a certification exam and the evidence showed that she took the exam several times and used study aids holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex