of India. Varghese could prove his eligibility for asylum by demonstrating that he has a well-founded fear of future persecution in India. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(b)(1)(B)©; 1101(a)(42)(A). To establish a well-founded fear of persecution, an alien must demonstrate that he genuinely fears persecution on account of his religion and that this fear is objectively reasonable. See Prela, 394 F.3d at 519. The IJ did not doubt the sincerity of Varghese’s fear, but found it objectively unreasonable. To demonstrate that his fear is objectively reasonable, Varghese had to show “ ‘specific, detailed facts supporting the reasonableness of [his] fear that [he] will be singled out for persecution.’ ” Bhatt v. Reno, 172 F.3d 978, 982 (7th Cir.1999) (quoting Bevc v. INS, 47 F.3d 907, 910 (7th Cir.1995)) (<HOLDING>). What’s more, an applicant “does not have a
holding that a showing of past persecution creates a rebuttable presumption of future persecution holding that two arrests and repeated beatings constituted persecution holding that threats standing alone generally do not constitute past persecution holding that beatings vandalism threats and humiliation in the aggregate  rise to the level of persecution as contemplated by the act holding that indian applicants testimony of beatings and threats by hindu radicals is too vague speculative and insubstantial to establish either past or future persecution