legal definition of ‘property’ most often refers not to a particular physical object, but rather to the legal bundle of rights recognized in that object.” Brotherton v. Cleveland, 923 F.2d 477, 481 (6th Cir.1991). See also U.S. v. Frost, 125 F.3d 346, 367 (6th Cir.1997). Included in this bundle of rights are the rights to “possess, use and dispose” of a particular article. Brotherton, 923 F.2d at 481. Under Michigan law, a liquor license is property which includes the right to serve alcohol until 2:00 a.m. Accordingly, just as a licensee’s license could not be revoked without due process, neither can a licensee’s right to serve alcohol until 2:00 a.m. be revoked without due process. Cf. Sea Girt Restaurant & Tavern Owners Ass’n v. Borough of Sea Girt, 625 F.Supp. 1482, 1487-89 (D.N.J.)(<HOLDING>), aff'd, 802 F.2d 448 (3rd Cir.1986). If Keego
holding that because process is not an end in itself once a court has found that the petitioner does not have a valid liberty interest a challenge to both procedural and substantive due process must fail holding that privileges licenses certificates and franchises qualify as property interests for purposes of procedural due process but that due process only becomes relevant where such property is deprived holding that a new jersey liquor license is a property interest for purposes of due process analysis and that the statutory process by which municipalities set the hours during which alcoholic beverages may be sold must afford procedural due process to licensees holding that the denial of due process in a particular case is subject to harmless error analysis holding that doctrine does not violate due process