property of another, personal. injury, forcible entry and detainer, and forcible detainer.” Id. Under the residual statute of limitations, a four-year period applies to “[e]very action for which there is no express limitations period.” Id. § 16.051 (West 2015). A statutory claim to avoid and. rescind an agreement for barratry does not fall into any of the categories of claims governed by the two-year statute of limitations found in § 16.003(a). Nor is such a claim-identified in another statute of limitations.- We-thus conclude that a claim under original Government Code § 82.065(b) is a claim not covered by another, express limitations, period, and thus the four-year residual statute of limitations applies to the Clients’ claims under original § 82.065(b). Cf. Lowrey, 837 S.W.2d at 174 (<HOLDING>). Because the applicable limitations period is
holding that the uccs fouryear statute of limitations provision which barred an action by the plaintiff did not bar a thirdparty contribution and indemnity claim holding that fouryear residual statute of limitations applied to claim for commonlaw rescission recognizing a fouryear statute of limitation for fraud claims holding that new yorks threeyear residual statute of limitations for personal injury claims not embraced by specific statutes rather than oneyear statute of limitations for intentional torts governed  1983 action holding statute that extended statute of limitations for certain criminal sexual conduct could not be applied retroactively to a prosecution commenced after the limitations statute in effect at the time of the alleged offense had expired