is engaged in the performance of any one of the acts which such intent requires for its full execution, and, while so engaged, and within the res gestae of the intended crime, and in consequence thereof, the killing results. It must appear that there was such actual legal relation between the killing and the crime committed or attempted, that the killing can be said to have occurred as a part of the perpetration of the crime, or in furtherance of an attempt or purpose to commit it. In the usual terse legal phraseology, death must have been the probable consequence of the unlawful actX] ” Id. at 131 (emphasis added) (quoting State v. Diebold, 152 Wash. 68, 72, 277 P. 394 (1929) (quoting 13 Ruling Case Law 845)); see also State v. Dudrey, 30 Wn. App. 447, 450, 635 P.2d 750 (1981) (<HOLDING>). The Golladay court reasoned that for a
holding that proof of an agreement to commit a felony is not a necessary element in a conviction for the commission of the felony holding in the context of the criminal false claims act that to prove falsity the government only had to prove that the statement was known to be untrue at the time the defendant made it holding the state must prove that at the time of the homicide the defendant was engaged in the commission of the felony holding that a defendant may be convicted of felony murder when the death of his accomplice was a reasonably foreseeable result of their commission of a felony holding that for facilitation of a felony the state must prove the commission of a specified felony and the assistance the accused gave to the person committing the specified felony