FCC v. Beach Communications, Inc., - U.S. -, -, 113 S.Ct. 2096, 2101-02, 124 L.Ed.2d 211 (1993); Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York, 336 U.S. 106, 69 S.Ct. 463, 93 L.Ed. 533 (1949), but a legislative choice burdening the exercise of a fundamental right must pass strict scrutiny. Plyler v. Doe, 457 U.S. 202, 216-17 & n. 15, 102 S.Ct. 2382, 2395 & n. 15, 72 L.Ed.2d 786 (1982). While the freedom of speech is, of course, a fundamental right, e.g., Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233, 244, 56 S.Ct. 444, 446, 80 L.Ed. 660 (1936), courts have developed different standards for its restriction depending on the particulars of the speech or the type of regulation at issue. Compare, e.g., Regan v. Taxation With Representation, 461 U.S. 540, 103 S.Ct. 1997, 76 L.Ed.2d 129 (1983) (<HOLDING>), with Minneapolis Star & Tribune Co. v.
holding that imposition of government fees did not violate exempt status of religious organization holding that evidence that defense witnesses were members of the same organization of tax protesters as defendant was properly admitted to show bias holding where contributions to lobbying organization were generally not tax exempt exception for veterans organization was speakerbased discrimination not aimed at the suppression of ideas and satisfied rational scrutiny holding that an organization whose members are injured may represent those members even where the organization itself cannot show injury holding where exempt organization was in possession of real property under land contract obligating organization to pay the purchase price and use land for exempt purpose the association was the owner of the land within the meaning of the statute