detention would not be temporary.” (punctuation omitted)). 18 Crider, 319 Ga. App. at 569 (punctuation omitted). 19 State v. Mosley, 321 Ga. App. 236, 238-39 (739 SE2d 106) (2013) (punctuation omitted). 20 Id. at 239. 21 Id. (punctuation and emphasis omitted). 22 We note that, similar to a police officer who witnesses a traffic violation, under OCGA § 52-7-25 (b) (4), a DNR officer “shall have the power... [t]o board vessels in use, for purposes of examining any documents and safety equipment, and to search without warrant any vessel which is not at its regular mooring or berth when he believes that any law of this state or any rule or regulation of the Board of Natural Resources relating to boating has been violated])]” See Peruzzi v. State, 275 Ga. 333, 334-35 (567 SE2d 15) (2002) (<HOLDING>). 23 Tolliver, 273 Ga. at 787 (punctuation
holding that a dog sniff of a vehicle during a traffic stop conducted absent reasonable suspicion of illegal drug activity did not violate the fourth amendment because it did not implicate any legitimate privacy interest holding that an officers reasonable mistake of law can give rise to the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the fourth amendment holding strip searches conducted in the station house without reasonable suspicion that minor offenders had possession of contraband are unreasonable and violate the fourth amendment holding that a stop based on reasonable suspicion and serving a community earetaking function did not violate the fourth amendment holding that statute permitting dnr rangers to stop boats without any suspicion in order to examine documents and safety equipment was reasonable and did not violate the fourth amendment