a grand jury investigation. I A federal grand jury in the District of Nevada is busy investigating the financial transactions of a certain company. Attorney Christopher Kiernan represented several witnesses who were called before the grand jury. The government, seeing the potential for a conflict of interest among his clients, moved to disqualify Kiernan from his multiple representation. The district court held a hearing pursuant to Wheat v. United States, 486 U.S. 153, 108 S.Ct. 1692, 100 L.Ed.2d 140 (1988). Upon determining that the witnesses had waived their right to conflict-free counsel and that the government had not made a showing sufficient to overcome these waivers, the district court denied the motion without prejudice. Shortly . 368, 375, 101 S.Ct. 669, 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981) (<HOLDING>). The later cases obviously cast doubt on the
holding that the denial of a motion to remand is interlocutory and not immediately appealable holding that the denial of a motion to disqualify counsel in a civil case is not appealable holding that denial of counsel in section 1983 action is not immediately appealable holding that an order granting a new trial in a civil action is appealable holding that denial of motion for summary judgment not appealable because did not determine any rights and liabilities