are subject to liquidation by the trustee. (Id. Ex. 7 at 116) The court agrees with Judge Derby’s determination that the parties intended to include all named and unnamed assets as part of the bankruptcy estate. The Order approving the Plan confirms the court’s understanding based on the representations of counsel at the hearing. The Order states that “the rights, duties, and obligations of the Liquidating Agent, as defined in the Plan, shall be applicable to all of the assets of the estate, whether known or unknown.” (Id. Ex. 5 at 3) Therefore, the Debtor’s interest in the instant litigation, which was mentioned in the Disclosure, but not the Plan, is included as an asset; the Bankruptcy Court has jurisdiction over the claim under § 1334(b). See A.H. Robins Co., 788 F.2d at 1001 n. 11 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the Bankruptcy Court’s March 15,
holding that if dispute involves funds that are not property of estate it cannot be maintained in the bankruptcy court unless it is related to the bankruptcy proceeding which means it is likely to affect the debtors estate holding that the district court had bankruptcy jurisdiction over a professional malpractice action filed by a title 11 debtor against the law firm that represented him in his bankruptcy case under section 1334b because the malpractice claim arose in the bankruptcy case holding that a claim which impacts the ultimate disposition of the bankruptcy estate is included in related to jurisdiction under  1334b holding that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor where the claim is a state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditors proof of claim in the bankruptcy emphasis added holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code