(Tex.1995) (citing Cosgrove v. Grimes, 774 S.W.2d 662, 665 (Tex.1989)). 61 . See Santosky, 455 U.S. at 759, 102 S.Ct. at 1398 (noting that juvenile delinquency adjudications, civil commitment, deportation, and denaturalization, at least to a degree, are all reversible official actions, but that, once affirmed on appeal, a New York decision terminating parental rights is final and irrevocable, and stating that "few forms of state action are both so severe and so irreversible”); In re A.K.V., 747 A.2d 570, 576-79 (D.C.Ct.App. 2000) (concluding that malpractice suit is not an apt remedy in termination cases and that monetary damages are wholly inadequate in such cases). 62 . In re A.K.V., 141 A.2d at 576-79. 63 . See In re T.R.R., 986 S.W.2d 31, 37 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); Odoms v. Batts, 791 S.W.2d 677, 680
holding that trial courts failure to appoint parent an attorney ad litem in termination proceeding was reversible error constituting official mistake for purposes of bill of review holding that a statute that provided that the court may appoint a guardian ad litem left the court with discretion to make an appointment holding denial of a petition to vacate a termination order was reversible error holding the trial court had jurisdiction where summons was served on the attorney advocate for the juveniles guardian ad litem holding the denial of a bill of particulars was not reversible error because it failed to cause the defendant any prejudice