The Court is alarmed by such a reading of the confirmed plan. Such a loose reading ignores the entirety of sentence 1 of paragraph 1, which conditions the Trustee’s supervision and control of funds on what “is necessary for the execution of the plan.” The terms of the plan are subsequently set forth in paragraph 1 by amount, frequency, and duration of payments as well as by the grand total of payments. Such terms are not for “mere convenience,” as the Trustee states, but rather, are binding on creditors. “The provisions of a confirmed plan bind the debtor and each creditor, whether or not the claim of such creditor is provided for by the plan, and whether or not such creditor has objected to, has accepted, or has rejected the plan.” 11 U.S.C. § 1327(a). See e.g., Meza, 467 F.3d at 877 (<HOLDING>). The Trustee is bound to administer the assets
holding that confirmation of a chapter 11 plan creates a binding contract which may be enforced in state courts holding that chapter 13 debtor lacked standing under 11 usc  548 but finding limited authority for the debtor to avoid a transfer under 11 usc  522h holding that a confirmed chapter 13 plan is binding on all parties under 11 usc  1327a however the plan may be modified pursuant to 11 usc  1329 holding that dismissal of a chapter 13 case vacates a confirmed plan holding that a plan under chapter 13 although confirmed was invalid because it failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of 11 usc  1322a2 requiring full payment of all claims entitled to priority