Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd., 709 F.2d 190 (3d Cir.1983). Coastal Steel involved a contract between two parties for the manufacture of a product for plaintiff. The court held that plaintiff was a third party beneficiary to that contract, and bound plaintiff, who was not a party to the contract, to the choice of law clause therein. In distinguishing Coastal Steel, the Third Circuit in E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. Rhone Poulenc Fiber & Resin Intermediates, S.A.S. stated, “if it was not the promisee’s intention to confer direct benefits upon a third party, but rather such third party happens to benefit from the performance of the promise either coincidentally or indirectly, then the third party will have no enforceable rights under the contract.” 269 F.3d 187, 196 (3d Cir.2001)(<HOLDING>). Furthermore, the Restatement of Contracts
holding that where a third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract the forum selection clause applies to the third party holding that the party did not waive its right to enforce the arbitration clause holding that the parent of a company that entered a contract with a third party could not enforce the contractual arbitration clause because there was no evidence that the parent was anything more than an incidental beneficiary recognizing that a forum selection clause also applies to a nonsignatory third party where the third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract holding that an incidental beneficiary does not have standing to sue for breach of a contract