an additional test by a physician of the person’s own choosing. In case the officer refuses to permit such additional testing, the testing administered pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1001. . . shall not be competent in evidence.” If a test is not competent evidence, it cannot be used to determine whether die person “had an alcohol concentration of .08 or greater” under K.S.A. 2009 Supp. 8-1020(h)(2)(G). Accordingly, we hold that the denial of a driver’s statutory right to consult wi& an attorney after alcohol testing is an appropriate issue to be addressed at a driver’s license suspension administrative hearing. Because the issue is within the scope of the administrative hearing, it is likewise within our scope of review. Sloop v. Kansas Dept. of Revenue, 296 Kan. 13, 17, 290 P.3d 555 (2012) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we will proceed to the merits of
holding that the flsa is not within the purview of section 5 of the fourteenth amendment holding issues within scope of administrative hearing are within the reviewing courts purview holding an arbitration tribunal fell within the purview of section 1782 holding in a title vii case that it was within the purview of the courts discretion to determine whether or not the actual time expended by an additional attorney was reasonable holding all issues within the scope of the appealed judgment are deemed incorporated within the mandate and thus are precluded from further adjudication