for extension of time within the 60 day statute of limitations. In the present case, the bar date was set for February 5, 1993. Herndon did not file her complaint to determine dischargeability of debt until March 15,1993. Since there was no motion for extension of time filed before the bar date, Herndon’s complaint must be dismissed as untimely unless Hern-don did not receive proper notice under the Bankruptcy Code and Rules. A. Receipt of Mail Presumption The Supreme Court has held that upon proof that mail is properly addressed, stamped a ce Manual, § 301.8 (1994-95 ed.). Herndon argues that Herndon’s attorney did not receive written notice of the Chapter 7 case. Herndon alleges that the address listed on Cruz’s schedule was incomplete. The address listed was: Judith Herndon, 0) (<HOLDING>); In re Alton, 837 F.2d 457, 460 (11th
holding that creditor lacked appellate standing to appeal order of bankruptcy court absent permission of bankruptcy court holding that an anticipated tax refund was property of the bankruptcy estate as of the date the bankruptcy case was filed holding that creditor did not have actual knowledge of the bankruptcy filing where the debtor informed creditor of the possibility that a bankruptcy case would be filed holding creditor possessed notice of the bankruptcy case at a date early enough for them to act upon their knowledge holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act