title and Ubaldo-Viezca’s and Garcia’s licenses. After hearing from BLOC, Barnes asked Garcia for consent to search her vehicle, which Garcia granted. At this point, the stop transformed into a consensual encounter. See id. Accordingly, the district court did not err in finding that the duration of the stop was constitutionally permissible. iv. District Court’s Failure to Hold a Hearing Ubaldo-Viezca asserts in his appellate brief that the district court erred by “failing to conduct an independent hearing” in connection with his motion to suppress. However, he cites no case law and makes no arguments in support of this claim. Accordingly, we do not address this issue, because Ubaldo-Viezca has abandoned it on appeal. See United States v. Cunningham, 161 F.3d 1343, 1344 (11th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). B. Admission of Firearms We review a district
holding that a habeas petitioner abandons the claims he does not address on appeal holding that a party abandons claims that he does not argue in his brief holding that the court properly refused to instruct on an issue for which no evidence was offered holding that an appellant abandons an issue for purposes of appeal where he fails to argue it in his briefs holding that a defendant abandons an issue for which no argument is offered on appeal