automatically require dismissal of Plaintiffs complaint with prejudice. The complaint alleges that Sellers and Defendant signed the Contract, and a copy of the Contract is attached. The answer in turn admits that Sellers and Defendant signed the Com tract, and that an accurate copy of the Contract is attached to the complaint. The complaint also alleges that the Assignment, a copy of which is attached, was signed by Rumaldo Borrego, assigning the Contract to himself, Nick Sanchez, and the Plaintiff as joint tenants, and the Answer admits these allegations, while denying the validity and effectiveness of the Assignment. Therefore, Plaintiff needs no witnesses to admit these documents into evidence in her case in chief. See Chavez v. Gribble, 83 N.M. 688, 689, 496 P.2d 1084, 1085 (1972) (<HOLDING>); Slemmons v. Massie, 102 N.M. 33, 35, 690 P.2d
holding that if evidence is improperly admitted but other evidence establishes essentially the same facts there is no prejudice to the accused and no reversible error holding improperly admitted testimony was cumulative to the other properly admitted evidence and was therefore harmless holding that the defendants confession was erroneously admitted into evidence over objection and the court erred in not sustaining the defendants motion for judgment of acquittal where there was no evidence which tended to establish that the fire was incendiary or which corroborated the defendants statements holding there was no rule 404b violation where the evidence was admitted to show knowledge and knowledge was an element of the crime charged holding contract itself having been pleaded attached to pleading and admitted was before the court and there was no occasion to offer or receive it into evidence