that under Florida law, the principles of equitable subrogation apply to both real and personal property, but concluded that under Boley, Horizon was precluded from utilizing the doctrine due to its negligence in failing to review the results of the records search and because Horizon h the U.S. District Court in Picker noted that: “regardless of the Picker decision, the trial court was required to follow Sun-trust, as it was a controlling decision of a district court in Florida. Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665, 666 (Fla.1992) (finding that in the absence of inter-district conflict or contrary precedent for the supreme court, the decision of a district court of appeal is binding throughout Florida); see also Roland v. Fla. East Coast Ry., LLC, 873 So.2d 1271, 1275 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (<HOLDING>) (citations omitted). As such, for these
recognizing federal authority on standing to be persuasive recognizing that decisions of lower federal courts interpreting federal law are not binding on state courts holding official comments to the code are persuasive but not controlling authority holding the florida appellate courts are not bound by federal precedent which is persuasive not binding authority recognizing that although federal precedent was not binding it was persuasive authority