we are unable to determine how the trial court arrived at its conclusion that the father should pay $32 per month in child support. The father argues in his appellate brief before this court that the trial court deviated from the child-support guidelines set forth in the Appendix to Rule 32 in arriving at its conclusion that the father should pay $32 per month in child support. However, in order for a trial court to deviate from the child-support guidelines set forth in the Appendix to Rule 32, it is required to make an express determination that application of the guidelines would be manifestly unjust or inequitable and to state its reasons for deviating from the guidelines. See Rule 32(A)(ii), Ala. R. Jud. Admin.; see also Sexton v. Sexton, 42 So.3d 1280, 1283 n. 4 (Ala.Civ.App.2010) (<HOLDING>). The trial court in the present case made no
holding that a trial court may deviate from the childsupport guidelines if it determines that a deviation is appropriate and it states its reasons for the deviation in accordance with rule 32aii ala r jud admin holding that if a trial court reaches the right result but for the wrong reasons it will be upheld if there is any basis which would support the judgment in the record holding that it is not holding that it may not holding that the trial court is required to provide reasons for its decision prior to appeal