was threatened with discharge, asked to resign, overworked, required to attend counselling sessions dealing with his performance, told he was not doing a good job, given warning notices, and closely monitored). 12 . In its Reply Brief, defendants also argue that the two-year New Jersey statute of limitations for injuries to person, N.J.S.A. § 2A:14-2, precludes much of Bishop' intentional infliction of emotional distress claim. (Defendants' Reply Brief at 13). New Jersey courts have not decided the appropriate statute of limitations for intentional infliction of emotional distress claims, however, and a recent New Jersey Supreme Court opinion casts doubt on the appropriate limitations period for employment-related claims. See Montells v. Haynes, 133 N.J. 282, 295, 627 A.2d 654 (1993) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, this tort may be governed by the
holding that a sixyear statute of limitations applies in cases where the operative facts arose both before and after july 27 1993 holding that while the two year personal injury statute of limitations is proper for claims under the new jersey law against discrimination hjsa  10513 the decision would be applied prospectively only and thus claims arising before july 27 1993 are governed by the sixyear general statute of limitations hjsa 2a141 holding that the statute of limitations for  1983 claims is the most closely analogous state limitations period for general personal injury claims holding that this courts sixyear statute of limitations is jurisdictional recognizing a sixyear statute of limitations on claims filed under the coal act