“written document ... of a type which is in ordinary course of business transferred by delivery”). In the context of insurance litigation, this policy is particularly appropriate as the insurer generally controls the structure and wording of both the original instrument and its amended form. Cf. Styer, 38 Pa. D. & C.2d at 335 (“A given policy, as- delivered to the insured, contains a vast torrent of words not a part of the company’s agreement because nonapplicable provisions are not physically removed.”). To the extent that there remains any ambiguity that costs of defense include delay damages or interest running to the time of the verdict, these ambiguities are construed against the drafter-insurer. See Riccio, 705 A.2d at 426; cf. Incollingo v. Ewing, 474 Pa. 527, 379 A.2d 79 (1977) (<HOLDING>). In his April 11, 2003 order, the District
holding that a broadly worded forum selection clause extending to any dispute arising  in relation to  the contract easily encompasses a dispute in which the contract is raised as a defense holding that the cost of capital equipment is not recoverable under the terms of the miller act holding that prevailing party was entitled to attorneys fees under an option contract which had expired prior to litigation because the parties were litigating their performance under the terms of the contract holding that postverdict interest is a cost of defense under the terms of an insurance contract similarly worded to the contracts in the instant litigation holding that party was an agent under the plain terms of his contracts