one computer source at a time. 4 . Sandra is Brown's mother. Brown was living in a basement bedroom in his mother's home. 5 . During questioning, Brown admitted that the computer was his. 6 . The thirty-nine additional counts stem from separate images of child pornography found as a result of the February 21 search of Brown's bedroom during which police seized Brown's computer and numerous CDs and DVDs. 7 . As noted above, the State filed this request on September 12, 2008, three days prior to trial. 8 . We note that Brown objected to the State's September 12, 2008 motion to amend the charging information. Brown did not argue in either his responsive motion or in open court that the law as set forth in Fajardo v. State, 859 N.E.2d 1201 (Ind.2007), was the basis for his objection. Br 2) (<HOLDING>). The key difference between this case and the
holding that a single transaction involving multiple obscene materials constitutes but one offense recognizing step transaction doctrine whereby courts must consider all steps of transaction in light of entire transaction so that substance of transaction will control over form of each step holding that to establish a pattern of unlawful activity in a ease involving currency transaction report violations the government must prove that the currency transaction report violations were both repeated and related to one another holding that the state may charge a defendant with only one count of disseminating obscenity for each separate transaction even though several obscene magazines were disseminated during each transaction holding that sale of two obscene magazines to one detective in one transaction and sale of two obscene films to another detective in another transaction could result in only one conviction for each separate transaction