or the application by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims of law to factual situations. 38 U.S.C. §§ 7261(c), 7292(d)(2) (1994); Bustos v. West, 179 F.3d 1378, 1380 (Fed.Cir.1999). Title 38 imposes specific requirements for preservation of a veteran’s right of appeal to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims: (1) In order to obtain review by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims of a final decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, a person adversely affected by such decision shall file a notice of appeal with the Court within 120 days after the date on which n nue, 691 S.W.2d 216 (Ky.Ct.App.1985) (finding that an incorrect zip code used in a notice of tax lien did not preclude the address from being proper); Kahl v. SAIF Corp., 86 Or.App. 203, 738 P.2d 999 (Or.Ct.App.1987) (<HOLDING>); Judkins v. Davenport, 59 S.W.3d 689
holding that although an address in which the zip code is incorrect may be properly addressed an address in which both the zip code and the street address is incorrect is not properly addressed holding that service was not defeated by an address with an incorrect zip code holding that an inaccurate zip code does not render an address improper for purposes of texas rule of civil procedure 5 holding that an incorrect zip code does not render an otherwise proper address improper holding that whether an incorrect zip code on a notice of sale is properly addressed is a question of fact