Practice Agreement after beginning to work for Geisinger. See Gray v. York Newspapers, Inc., 957 F.2d 1070, 1078 (3d Cir.1992) (we view the facts "in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party” on a motion for summary judgment). 2 . In Edwards’s opening brief, he also contends that he provided additional consideration to Geisinger, primarily by moving from the United Kingdom to Pennsylvania to accept Geisinger's offer. However, Edwards claims elsewhere in his brief that he relies only on an express contract theory and not on an implied contract theory, even though additional consideration may support a finding of an implied contract to retain the employee for a reasonable period of time. See, e.g., Cashdollar v. Mercy Hosp. of Pittsburgh, 406 Pa.Super. 606, 595 A.2d 70, 74 (1991) (<HOLDING>); Scullion v. EMECO Indus., Inc., 398 Pa.Super.
holding that in determining whether an accident arose out of employment the issue is whether the employees employment brought him in contact with the risk that in fact caused his injuries holding that louisiana had jurisdiction over a modified contract of employment where the original employment contract was formed in texas but additional consideration for employment was negotiated in louisiana holding requirement of additional consideration and presumption of atwill employment are both rules of construction rather than substance and implied contract needs no additional consideration where intention of parties is clear holding that duration of limitation is a factor in determining whether limitation is significant holding that additional consideration is a factor in determining whether there is an implied contract of employment