is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to plant, propagate, cultivate, grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, convert, produce, process, prepare, test, analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into the human body a controlled substance in violation of this chapter. (ii) A violation of this subdivision (c)(l)(A)(i) is a Class A misdemeanor. (B) Any person who violates this section in the course of and in furtherance of a felony violation of this chapter is guilty of a Class C felony. (5) It is unlawful for any person to use, or to possess with intent to use, drug paraphernalia to manufacture methamphetamine in violation of this chapter. Any person who pleads guilty nolo cont 884 (1992) (<HOLDING>). We disagree that appellant lacks standing to
holding that where a statute uses the disjunctive term or the provisions of the statute plainly encompass two distinct situations holding that even though a bond contained provisions not required by statute it must be considered statutory and not common law because the bond did not expand the payment provisions beyond those stated in statute holding that an insured has substantially complied with the change of beneficiary provisions of a life insurance policy when he has done all that he could to comply with the provisions holding that the hearing provisions of the ina supersede the provisions of the apa holding the defendant lacked standing to challenge as unconstitutionally vague two provisions of the dui statute creating presumptions based on bloodalcohol content where the defendant asserted that those provisions conflicted with the subsection in the same statute setting the minimum bloodalcohol content but where he was not convicted under the provisions concerning the presumptions