of the district court is AFFIRMED. * This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 1 . The Listings describe “impairments which are considered severe enough to prevent a person from doing any gainful activity.” 20 C.F.R. § 404.1525(a). 2 . In one conclusory sentence, Mr. Candelario argues that he "would assert that the numbers of jobs set forth by the VE were insufficient.” Appellant’s Substitute Opening Brief (Aplt.Br.) at 26. This argument is waived. See Ambus v. Granite Bd. of Educ., 975 F.2d 1555, 1558 n. 1 (10th Cir.1992) (<HOLDING>), modified on other grounds on reh’g, 995 F.2d
holding issue waived where matter not addressed beyond reference in heading in brief holding issues argued orally but not addressed in brief were waived holding an issue listed in statement of issues on appeal but not addressed in brief is abandoned holding issue waived because it was not mentioned in brief but was only raised in notice of appeal holding that an issue mentioned in a brief but not addressed is waived