State.” Id. A valid search warrant must sufficiently identify “as near as may be” the person, place or thing to the warrant is not a violation of the search warrant statutes because article 18.06(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure only requires that the warrant and a written inventory be served upon the owner of the premises to be searched. Tex.Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 18.06(b) (Vernon Supp.1996); Turner, 886 S.W.2d at 864; Gonzales, 743 S.W.2d at 720 (article 18.06(b) does not require a copy of the affidavit for the warrant to be provided). Absent some showing of prejudice or harm, the failure to provide a copy of the affidavit does not render the search invalid. Gonzales, 743 S.W.2d at 720; see also Robles v. State, 711 S.W.2d 752, 753 (Tex.App. — San Antonio 1986, pet. refd) (<HOLDING>). Appellant is correct that the search warrant
holding that failure to deliver a copy of search warrant and itemized copy of the warrant return to defendant in absence of showing of injury reveals no error holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant holding that the government made a prima facie showing of authenticity of a warrant of removal where the immigration agent who maintained the defendants immigration file testified at trial as to his recordkeeping practices and that the warrant admitted was a true and correct copy of the warrant in the defendants file holding that under former rcw 6933430 1959 although preferable if defendant is served personally with a copy of the search warrant it was not reversible error when defendant received the warrant the next day holding that search not invalidated by defendant receiving unsigned and undated copy of warrant