authority under IAC rule 201-10.11. II. We review the district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the same standard as the district court. Roth v. U.S.S. Great Lakes Fleet, Inc., 25 F.3d 707, 708 (8th Cir.1994). Summary judgment is ap from outside source donations to satisfy those obligations without first providing an individualized hearing, ostensibly to determine whether the money is for an important purpose that should render it exempt from deductions. They contend that an across-the-board deduction- of twenty percent from all money entering prison accounts violates the Due Process Clause. We agree with the district court that inmates have a property interest in money received from outside sources. See Jensen v. Klecker, 648 F.2d 1179, 1183 (8th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>); Sell v. Parratt, 548 F.2d 753, 757 (8th Cir.)
holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding inmates possess a constitutionally cognizable property interest in the interest earned on money held in their prison accounts holding that inmates have a property interest in their money holding that inmates do not have the right to the medication of their choice holding that inmates have no constitutionally protected interest in the wages earned while in prison