at 108, 85 S.Ct. 741; State v. Malkin, 722 P.2d 943, 947 n. 10 (Alaska 1986); State v. Davenport, 510 P.2d 78, 82 n. 8 (Alaska 1973). 8 . Massachusetts v. Upton, 466 U.S. 727, 732, 104 S.Ct. 2085, 80 L.Ed.2d 721 (1984). 9 . Koen, 113 P.3d at 680. 10 . Id. 11 . Id. at 678. 12 . Id. at 677. 13 . The strength of the inference can be confirmed by considering the flip side of the proposition: assuming that a search conducted under the warrant had led the troopers to search a location that was not Koen's residence, it seems hard to imagine that the search would not have been challenged on the theory that Trooper Browning had misrepresented material facts by misleading the magistrate to believe that the warrant was aimed at Koen's residence. Cf. State v. Malkin, 722 P.2d 943 (Alaska 1986) (<HOLDING>). 14 . Davenport, 510 P.2d at 82 n. 8. In this
holding warrant valid where search warrant application affidavit was signed and probable cause existed for issuance of warrant holding that a warrant may be vitiated when supporting affidavit intentionally or recklessly misrepresents material facts holding that the fourth amendment requires that a defendant be allowed an opportunity to challenge the veracity of an affidavit supporting a search warrant holding that officers reliance on accountant negated a finding that he acted consciously voluntarily intentionally knowingly or recklessly in his failure to pay tax holding that a search warrant is invalid if not based on an affidavit