the BIA’s August 24, 1999 decision. The BIA denied the motion to reopen on July 31, 2000 because it was filed more than 90 days after its August 24, 1999 decision. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(c)(2). The BIA also held that the exception to the 90-day rule for asylum cases set forth in 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(c)(3)(ii) was inapplicable because Moutafov failed to demonstrate the existence of a change of circumstances in Bulgaria. II Moutafov seeks judicial review of the dismissal of his appeal by the BIA from the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation. He contends that he was denied a full and fair hearing by the immigration judge. Under the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 § 309(c)(4)(C), a petition for judicial review must be filed no 1955) (<HOLDING>). Ill Moutafov also contends that the denial of
holding that an alien is not deprived of due process if he or she receives actual notice of a denial of an application to withhold deportation holding that alien demonstrated deportation proceedings were fundamentally unfair when alien was deprived effective assistance of counsel holding that alien need not receive actual notice for due process requirements to be satisfied holding that due process rights were not violated when alien claimed a lack of actual notice but his attorney received notice holding that the ijs failure to inform alien that he was eligible for relief from deportation constitutes a due process violation if alien establishes prejudice