were free from its control and direction. Id. at 1 30. 110 We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' determination that Diligent failed to prove that the 220 drivers were actually independent contractors under seetion 8-70-115. II. Standard of Review 111 The employer has the burden of proving that the putative employee is an independent contractor under section 8-70-115. Long View Sys. Corp. USA v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 197 P.3d 295, 298 (Colo.App.2008). Whether the employer has met this burden is a question of fact. Id. We will not disturb the ICAO panel's determination as long as the ICAO panel properly applied the law and the findings of fact support its conclusion. § 8-74-107(6)(c) to (d), C.R.S. (2018); Allen Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 762 P.2d 677, 680 (Colo.1988) (<HOLDING>). However, whether the ICAO panel applied the
recognizing that the district courts decision to termi nate parental rights will be upheld by this court if it is supported by substantial evidence holding that the icaos decision should not be disturbed if it is supported by substantial evidence holding that if a decision below is correct it will not be disturbed on appeal even though the lower court relied upon wrong reasons holding that substantial evidence supports an adverse credibility finding if it is supported by specific cogent reasons holding that trial courts determination of whether defendant accepted responsibility should not be disturbed unless it is without foundation