supra at 485-486. 9 See Pfeiffer v. Ga. Dept. of Transp., 275 Ga. 827, 829 (2) (573 SE2d 389) (2002). 10 See Coldmatic, supra at 756 (summary judgment for defendant on plaintiffs breach of contract claim appropriate where key terms of contract were incomplete and subject to future negotiation, rendering contract unenforceable). 11 See OCGA § 15-10-43 (c); Uniform Magistrate Court Rule 34. 12 122 Ga. App. 681 (178 SE2d 543) (1970). 13 See OCGA § 15-10-42; UMCR 38; but see Howe v. Roberts, 259 Ga. 617, 619 (1) (385 SE2d 276) (1989) (magistrate courts may “follow the provisions of the Civil Practice Act, or any other appropriate rules and regulations relating to pleading, practice, and procedure, where to do so would ‘administer justice’ ”). 14 See Stuckey’s, supra at 690 (4). 15 See id. (<HOLDING>). 16 See also Universal Underwriters Ins. Co.
holding that there was no good cause to raise an untimely suppression issue where the defendant could have with due diligence discovered the information necessary to timely raise the issue holding that the failure to raise an issue in the opening brief waives the issue recognizing that the cpapermits a general denial but explaining that a general denial does not raise an issue as to a purported corporate defendants legal existence the defendant must raise such issue by direct negative averment to avoid waiver holding that a defendant who fails to raise a specific issue as the basis for suppression in a motion to suppress to the district court has waived the right to raise that issue on appeal holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue