torts committed by government employees “under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). However, section 2680(h) of the FTCA expressly excludes from the waiver of sovereign immunity: Any claim arising out of assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution, abuse of process, libel, slander, misrepresentation, deceit, or interference with contract rights. 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h) (emphasis added). Bateman’s proposed tort claims fall within section 2680(h). The claims for misrepresentation and deceit are expressly excepted from the waiver of sovereign immunity. See Gertner v. FDIC, 814 F.Supp. 177, 179 (D.Mass.1992) (<HOLDING>); FDIC v. diStefano, 839 F.Supp. 110, 121
holding that sovereign immunity bars an attorneys lien against the united states holding that ajlthough the  action is nominally one against individual defendants the acts complained of consist of actions taken by defendants in their official capacity as agents of the united states and that under such circumstances the action is in fact one against the united states holding that section 2680h specifically bars an action against the united states for misrepresentation recognizing federal constitutional claim against the united states holding that 28 usc  2680h bars suits against the government in all eases where the intentional tort was committed by a government employee