records in the course of law enforcement investigations.” Def.’s Reply Mem. at 12. The DEA has offered no evidence or explanation for its claim that Hemisphere is a “single” technique and procedure. See e.g. Blackwell v. F.B.I., 646 F.3d 37 (D.C.Cir.2011) (protecting disclosure of procedures used during the forensic examination of a computer and methods of collection, organization and presentation of data); Petrucelli v. Dept. of Justice, 106 F.Supp.3d 129, 139 (D.D.C. 2015) (protecting disclosure of a ratings column on a form used to record investigation accomplishments as a technique and procedure). Moreover, 7(E) is intended to protect information that is not generally known to the public. O’Reilly at 446; see also Rosenfeld v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 57 F.3d 803, 815 (9th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>) (citing National Sec. Archive v. F.B.I., 759
holding that purely reputational damage does not qualify for dueprocess protection holding that evidence of pretext may include the use of subjective criteria holding that use of a pretext phone call did not qualify for protection because the technique is generally known to the public holding that a set of photographs taken to be used as studies for a painting did not qualify for vara protection holding that public meeting did not satisfy public participation requirement because public did not receive adequate notice