that loss. Only the completion of foreclosure signifies that a lender will not collect on its note.” (citation omitted)). 9 Doss & Assoc. v. First Am. Title Ins. Co., Inc., 325 Ga. App. 448, 463 (4) n.15 (754 SE2d 85) (2013). 10 First Am. Bank, 759 F3d at 433 (III) (punctuation omitted); see also Gibraltar Sav. v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 905 F2d 1 97, 198 (2) (637 SE2d 198) (2006) (noting that under OCGA § 9-11-50, a party is barred from contending on appeal that it was entitled to a directed verdict based on the sufficiency of the evidence to support a claim if the party failed to move for a directed verdict as to that claim at trial). 20 Id. at 1 a. App. 9, 11 (1) (761 SE2d 437) (2014) (punctuation omitted). 33 Id. (punctuation omitted). 34 See id. 35 See id. at 11-12 (1) (<HOLDING>); Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s of London u.
holding that the trial court erred in granting the school boards posttrial motion for directed verdict because although the school board timely moved for a directed verdict during trial it did not serve its motion for directed verdict until the eleventh day after the verdict holding that a motion denying summary judgment will not be reviewed on appeal from a jury verdict where sufficient evidence supports the jurys verdict holding defendants failure to file motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict did not prevent district court from granting motion for directed verdict for which court reserved decision holding that some evidence was presented to support the jurys verdict that defendant breached contract and therefore trial court did not err in denying defendants motion for directed verdict or jnov holding that a party must have made a directed verdict motion at trial on the specific issue which is the basis of the jnov