in her file, the CRA must “conduct a reasonable reinvestigation to determine whether the disputed information is inaccurate and record the current status of the disputed information, or delete the item from the file.” 15 U.S.C. § 1681i(a). Experian has provided a de tailed account of the procedures that it used in reinvestigating TOLIVER’s dispute regarding the L nreasonable for a CRA to contact only the creditor for verification of a consumer’s dispute when the CRA knew of a personal dispute between the creditor and the consumer). Because Toliver has failed to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to the accuracy of several of the entries in her Experian credit report, the § 1681i(a) claims related to those entries must fail as a matter of law. See DeAndrade, 523 F.3d at 67 (<HOLDING>). Because Toliver has not established a genuine
holding that an ineffectiveassistanceofcounsel claim may be brought in a collateral proceeding under  2255 whether or not the petitioner could have raised the claim on direct appeal holding that tort actions brought against a state actor must be brought in the illinois court of claims and the district courts dismissal of such claims was proper holding that congress overstepped its constitutional authority when divesting states of immunity for claims brought under the ada and holding that states are protected by immunity for claims brought under these statutes holding that a claim brought under  1681ia must fail absent a genuine issue of material fact as to accuracy and noting that the weight of authority in other circuits indicates that without a showing that the reported information was in fact inaccurate a claim brought under  1681i must fail holding that to demonstrate a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel petition must establish that the alleged error was prejudicial in fact