of the factual and legal details of the judge's proposed analysis, and the judge should then allow the parties to brief or argue the issue before making a final ruling. 1 . See AS 33.20.010; AS 33.20.030. 2 . AS 33.20.040(a) provides that when a prisoner serving two or more years of active imprisonment is released because of good-time credit, the prisoner must be released on mandatory parole for a term equal to their good time. 3 . Id. 4 . AS 33.20.040(c). 5 . See AS 33.05.040(5) (when a probation officer performs duties with respect to persons on parole, the probation officer is deemed a parole officer); AS 33.16.190 (a person appointed as a probation officer or as a parole officer may discharge the duties of either office). 6 . See State v. Shetters, 246 P.3d 332 (Alaska App.2010) (<HOLDING>). 7 . A defendant's eligibility for credit
holding that it is well settled that the pennsylvania board of probation and parole has exclusive authority to determine parole when the offender is sentenced to a maximum term of imprisonment of two or more years holding that there was no legal right to court review of parole board decision because there is no legal right to release on parole holding that a paralee who is released on mandatory parole is still technically a prisoner and thus entitled to goodtime credit if placed in a halfway house or other correctional facility under the authority of the parole board holding that parole is not a right in pennsylvania holding that no due process or other constitutional violation occurred when a virginia parolee was required to pay for room board and other costs incurred while serving out his sentence at a halfway house and noting that what little law there is on the subject supports the proposition that a state may require a prisoner to pay the costs of supervision as a condition of parole and that there is no supreme court case holding or even hinting to the contrary