01-26153 and 337 days for time served in case number 01-25640. Borroto, however, also claims that the time he served in each of these cases also should be applied to a 1982 conviction, which appears to be the basis for his current incarceration due to a parole violation. As Borroto claims that the Department of Corrections has failed to award him a credit for time served in this case, he is required to seek redress administratively with the Department of Corrections. After exhausting his administrative remedies, if Borroto is unsatisfied with the outcome, he may seek judicial relief by filing a petition for writ of mandamus under the 1982 case number, with the Second Judicial Circuit Court in and for Leon County, Florida. See Cordova v. State, 855 So.2d 216, 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(<HOLDING>); Barber v. State, 661 So.2d 355, 356 (Fla. 3d
holding that defendant seeking credit for time served must exhaust administrative remedies within the department of corrections prior to seeking judicial relief recognizing the general rule that parties must exhaust prescribed administrative remedies before seeking relief from federal courts  holding that persons seeking restoration of federal firearms privileges need not exhaust administrative remedies to invoke the judicial review provision of section 925c holding that state prisoner seeking only monetary damages in  1983 suit need not exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to  1997e if such remedies do not provide for the award of monetary relief holding that an alien must exhaust administrative remedies before seeking habeas relief from detention