within the F.M. 407 right-of-way, required the property owner’s consent, and that without that consent, the annexation is void. A general law municipality with a population of 1,000 or less cannot unilaterally annex land; it must either obtain the consent of the property owner, if the land is occupied by less than three qualified voters, or the consent of a majority of qualified voters inhabiting an occupied annexed area. TexLoc.Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 43.024, 43.025, 43.028 (Vernon 1988) (formally Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 974 & 974g); Tex.Loc.Gov’t Code Ann. § 43.033 (Vernon Supp.1994) (permitting general law municipalities having population of over 1,000 to unilaterally annex land provided certain conditions are met); Sitton v. City of Lindale, 455 S.W.2d 939, 940 n. 2, 941 (Tex.1970) (<HOLDING>); City of Kyle v. Price, 547 S.W.2d 376, 377-78
holding that municipal ordinance was preempted by frsa and void under supremacy clause holding annexation ordinance void holding annexation ordinance only voidable due to procedural irregularities holding annexation ordinance void where municipality attempted to annex unoccupied territory without owner consent holding that citys proceedings to annex an entire tract were void ab initio for lack of jurisdiction because it included annexation of unplatted tracts in violation of statute