and (4) Nabors had been previously convicted of possessing firearms. The Sixth Circuit has recognized that a forced entry into a residence approximately ten seconds after announcement may be reasonable. See United States v. Gatewood, 60 F.3d 248 (6th Cir.1995) (upholding a drug search involving an entry into a residence approximately ten seconds after announcement); United States v. Johnson, 2000 WL 712385, No. 98-3183 (6th Cir. May 24, 2000) (unpublished opinion) (upholding a five second wait between knocking and entering when officers knew drugs were present in the house as a result of a controlled delivery). Other courts have found a wait of ten to fifteen seconds before forcibly entering a residence to be reasonable. See United States v. Jones, 133 F.3d 358, 361 (5th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Spriggs, 996 F.2d 320,
holding that search of shoulder bag was not authorized by search warrant for apartment holding police officers show of authority by announcing he was a police officer and ordering defendant to stop was an investigative seizure implicating fourth amendment protections holding 15 to 20 seconds was reasonable amount of time for state police officers to wait before entering an apartment to execute a search warrant for drugs after knocking and announcing their presence holding that suppression is not an appropriate remedy for officers failure to serve a warrant to the defendant before during or immediately after the search holding under  3901 that because officers entered without knocking and announcing the subsequent arrest was invalid and the evidence seized inadmissible