and wove between lanes on several occasions. Morales’s testimony was more than a scintilla of evidence to support the ALJ’s finding that Bell failed to maintain a single lane of traffic and was sufficient to give rise to a reasonable suspicion that Bell was driving while intoxicated or that some activity out of the ordinary was occurring, so as to justify the temporary stop of Bell’s vehicle. See id; see also Texas Dept, of Public Safety v. Seidule, 991 S.W.2d 290, 293 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (finding substantial evidence to support finding of reasonable suspicion based on officer’s statement that driver of vehicle failed to maintain a single marked lane); Texas Dept, of Public Safety v. Nordin, 971 S.W.2d 90, 94 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1998, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Bell asserts that the decision in Hernandez
holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law holding alj correctly held that officer had reasonable suspicion to make stop based on observation that driver crossed over shoulder stripe and was weaving within his traveling lane holding an officer could ask for consent to search the trunk of a car where he had reasonable suspicion that the driver had crossed the border illegally and could be transporting illegal aliens holding that a police officer may stop a driver where the officer has a reasonable and articulable suspicion regarding the commission of a civil traffic violation holding that an officers observations of a vehicle weaving between the center line and the shoulder line four to five times over a distance of approximately five miles created reasonable suspicion that the driver was under the influence