675 N.E.2d at 486 (same); Intergy, Inc. v. Carrigan, No. 62210, 1993 WL 127089, at *2 (Ohio App. 8 Dist. Apr. 22, 1993) (same). Based on the evidence that Keeton used Keeton Corp. and the other Great Events, Inc. d/b/a entities as a convenient forum for her various personal business ventures, we find that she so completely dominated Keeton Corp. that it had no mind or will of its own and was nothing but Keeton’s alter ego. With regard to the other claims of commingling of funds and failure to maintain corporate formalities, we do not find that Taylor Steel has met its burden on these points; the record contains hints, but nothing resembling proof of these claims. Univ. Circle Research Ctr. Corp. v. Galbreath Co., 106 Ohio App.3d 835, 667 N.E.2d 445, 449 (Ohio App. 8 Dist.1995) (<HOLDING>). However, arguably the reason the record is so
holding that the moving party bears a heavy burden of proving the facts required for disqualification recognizing that the party seeking attorney fees bears the burden of proving entitlement to those fees holding that the defendant bears the burden of proving outside contact with the jury holding that the party seeking to pierce the corporate veil bears the burden of proving that grounds for this action exist holding that a party seeking a writ bears the burden of proving that it has no other means of attaining the relief such as by appeal