in a survival action stems from the rights possessed by the decedent. Further, the limitations period in a wrongful death action begins to run “when a pecuniary loss is .sustained by the beneficiaries of the person whose death has been caused by the tort of another.” Moyer, 651 A.2d at 1142. The cases cited by Defendants provide little guidance where, as here, Child sustained his injury, and Plaintiffs incurred their pecuniary loss re- suiting from Child’s death, years after the allegedly negligent act. In this case, Plaintiffs’ recovery for damages in their survival action stems from the rights of action possessed by the decedent, i.e., Child, at the time of his death. See id. at 1141. Child did not possess any rights to proceed against Defendants until he suffered an injury. See id. (<HOLDING>). The evidence, viewed in a light most
holding that the statute of limitations begins to run on the date the alleged malpractice is discovered holding that when the representations and warranties were made on the date of closing the statute of limitations began to run on that date even though the contract imposed cure and repurchase obligations on the defendant holding that the date on which the plaintiff learned of the defendants denial of tenure not the date on which the plaintiff became unemployed was when the statute of limitations began to run holding that  2401a statute of limitations on procedural challenge began to run at the latest on the date the challenged regulation was amended recognizing that the statute of limitations for a survival action began to run on the date of the decedents injury as though he was bringing his own lawsuit