makes payment on a submitted false claim, the FCA statute of limitations starts running on the date payment was made, rather than on the (earlier) date the claim was submitted. See, e.g., United States v. Incorporated Village of Island Park, 888 F.Supp. 419, 441 (E.D.N.Y. 1995) (six-year statute of limitations period of § 3731(b)(1) begins to run on date of submission of claim for payment, or, if the claim is paid, from the date of payment); United States ex rel. Kreindler & Kreindler v. United Technologies Corp., 985 F.2d 1148, 1157 (2d Cir.1993) (noting the same in dicta); United States ex rel. Duvall v. Scott Aviation, 733 F.Supp. 159, 161 (W.D.N.Y.1990) (“DOt is the payment not the request which triggers the statute”); United States v. Klein, 230 F.Supp. 426, 441 (W.D.Pa.1964) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 356 F.2d 983 (3d Cir.1966). Cf. United
holding that 31 usc  235 the predecessor to  3729 did not become operative until final payment had been made on the false claims holding that counsels claim against the government pursuant to a contingencyfee agreement was invalid because it was in violation of the antiassignment act 31 usc  203 predecessor to the assignment of claims act holding implied false certifications must be material to the governments payment decision in order to be actionable under the false claims act holding no liability under false claims act unless certification prerequisite to payment holding that because an indemnitor is not liable until the indemnitee actually makes payment interest does not accrue until the payment is made