but the Court lacks the ability to do so. Although a sentence may not typically be modified once imposed, “the [C]ourt, upon motion of the Director of the Bureau of Prisons, may reduce the term of imprisonment ... if it finds that ... extraordinary and compelling reasons warrant such a reduction.” 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(l)(A)(i). A prisoner’s serious medical condition may amount to an “extraordinary and compelling reason” however, “[w]here the Bureau of Prisons has not moved to reduce the terms of a defendant’s sentence, the Court may not modify a term of imprisonment [on grounds of a medical condition].” United States v. DeFeo, No. 90 Cr. 250, 2008 WL 2557425, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 26, 2008) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Olachea-Merida, 242 F.3d 385, 385 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Smartt, 129 F.3d 539, 541
holding that no sentence is imposed in the case of a sis holding that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to modify the sentence originally imposed by imposing an additional term of fifteen years suspended sentence holding the court had no jurisdiction to modify a validly imposed sentence on prisoners own motion holding untimeliness of motion to modify medical insurance payment did not preclude motion to modify maintenance holding that outside of rule 35 there exists no inherent authority for a district court to modify a sentence