the particular intrusion, the manner in which it is conducted, the justification for initiating it, and the place in which it is conducted. Bell, 441 U.S. at 559, 99 S.Ct. at 1884. The Bell balancing test for reasonableness requires “at a minimum, that the facts upon which an intrusion is based be capable of measurement against ‘an objective standard,’ whether this be probable cause or a less stringent test.” Mary Beth G. v. City of Chicago, 723 F.2d 1263, 1273 (7th Cir.1983) (quoting Delaware v. Prouse, 440 U.S. 648, 654, 99 S.Ct. 1391, 1396, 59 L.Ed.2d 660 (1979) (footnotes omitted)). Courts which have considered the strip search issue have applied “objective standards” ranging from “reasonable suspicion” to “probable cause.” See, e.g., Giles v. Ackerman, 746 F.2d 614 (9th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1053, 105 S.Ct. 2114,
holding strip searches conducted in the station house without reasonable suspicion that minor offenders had possession of contraband are unreasonable and violate the fourth amendment holding that arrestees for minor offenses may be subjected to a strip search only if jail officials have reasonable suspicion to believe that arrestees are concealing weapons or contraband holding that mandatory routine visual strip search policy for all arrestees who were to be introduced into general jail population was constitutional holding that police may search containers whether open or closed located within arrestees reach holding unconstitutional blanket jail policy of subjecting all arrestees to strip and visual body cavity searches