and Plaintiff does not allege that those two inmates wanted to harm Plaintiff specifically. Finally, Plaintiff does not allege that either dangerous inmate was housed in Plaintiffs cell or that either dangerous. inmate threatened Plaintiff. Although Plaintiffs allegations show a “possibility” of injury, Plaintiffs allegations fail to show “extreme” conditions that create a “strong likelihood” of injury. As to the subjective component, Plaintiffs limited allegations establish, at most, that prison officials acted negligently. Plaintiffs allegations span more than three years, yet Plaintiff identifies only a few incidents of general population inmates (only two of which are described as dangerous) in protective management. See Zatler v. Wainwright, 802 F.2d 397, 403 (11th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, Plaintiff fails to allege facts
holding that no deliberate indifference existed even though  on at least one occasion while in protective custody the plaintiffprisoner was housed with another inmate who physically attacked him holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal holding no liability existed under the circumstances holding that suspect was not in custody when officer handcuffed him for officer safety while transporting him to police station holding that no deliberate prosecutorial misconduct existed after the first trial ended in a hung jury