battled depression and mental anguish. I was unable to disclose my arrest and the reason for the arrest to my children. It was only when the trial was close that I told my children when they observed serious changes in my attitudes toward them. My social life diminished considerably while the criminal case against me was pending. I suffered in silence for nearly two (2) years until my acquittal on March 9, 2010.... When the case was given to the jury we waited outside the court for a verdict. Waiting for that verdict was suffocating. I felt like dying. Appellant’s App. at 105-06. [39] At the very least, Bah’s affidavit raises a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Appellees’ conduct caused her severe emotional distress. See Hughley v. State, 15 N.E.3d 1000, 1004 (Ind.2014) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we reverse and remand for further
holding that by fading to timely raise the issue before the trial court the defendant had waived the right to raise the issue on appeal that the trial court failed to consider less severe sanctions holding that defendants selfserving affidavit was sufficient to raise a factual issue to be resolved at trial holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review holding that trial counsel did not act unreasonably in failing to raise the issue of the defendants mental health at trial holding that defendant failed to raise a constitutional issue at trial and thus waived appellate review of that issue