(2). 21 Old Republic filed its motion to exclude RM Kids’s expert’s testimony in July 2013; thus Georgia’s new Evidence Code applies. See Ga. L. 2011, pp. 99, 214, § 101. Regardless, because OCGA § 24-7-702 is “substantively identical” to “its predecessor stat ion omitted); accord Moore, 334 Ga. App. at 793 (1). 26 HNTB Ga., Inc., 287 Ga. at 643 (1) (punctuation omitted); accord Toler v. Ga. Dep’t of Transp., 328 Ga. App. 144, 152 (4) (761 SE2d 550) (2014). 27 Brady v. Elevator Specialists, Inc., 287 Ga. App. 304, 306 (1) (653 SE2d 59) (2007) (punctuation omitted). 28 Id. at 307 (punctuation omitted). 29 Id. (punctuation omitted). 30 Levine v. SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, 321 Ga. App. 268, 278 (4) (b) (740 SE2d 672) (2013) (punctuation omitted). 31 See Brady, 287 Ga. App. at 306-07 (1) (<HOLDING>). 32 Atlanta Emergency Serv., LLC v. Clark, 328
holding that trial court didnot abuse its discretion in admitting experts opinion which was based primarily on his own experience in the field holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in qualifying an expert witness in the area of gang identity and investigation based on his training and experience holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting gangrelated evidence holding that an experts opinion must be based on facts in evidence or within his or her knowledge and that the admission of an experts opinion is reviewed for an abuse of discretion holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony