to a term of imprisonment of not less than five years. There was ample testimony that Hoffman “actively employed” a firearm during the commission of a drug trafficking crime and a crime of violence. Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 144, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Oliver, Vasquez, and Rosado testified that Hoffman carried three firearms to the site of the robbery, that he handed two of these guns to Casbah and Oliver to assist him in the robbery, that he pointed a handgun at Vasquez and shot him in the leg, that he pointed a gun at Rosado and shot him in the b hallenging his convictions on the basis of sufficiency of evidence are persuasive. III. Hoffman argues that the government failed to prove that his activities affected interstate commerce and that, as a r r.1994) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we will affirm the conviction for
holding that purchase of search terms is a use in commerce holding that robbery of proceeds intended for purchase of cocaine affected interstate commerce holding that the connection between the robbery and interstate commerce was much more direct than in wang because at the time of the robbery the victim in walker was selling illegal drugs that had traveled through interstate commerce holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce holding that robbery of nationwide checkcashing company affected interstate commerce in violation of hobbs act