is timely. Next, the Court finds that Sunrise and Dignity have a real and substantial interest in the lawsuit. Sunrise and its subsidiary Dignity have already been awarded a special use permit by the Zoning Board, and the Petitioners in the instant action seek to have that permit annulled. Villager Pond, Inc. v. Town of Darien, 56 F.3d 375, 379 (2d Cir. 1995) (special use permit, once issued, unquestionably becomes protectible property of the person it is issued to). However, the Court finds that John Does 1-76, who are merely identified as the .future residents of the facility, do not have an interest in the litigation, and thus, are not entitled to intervene. See Rector, Wardens, and Members of Vestry of St. Bartholomew’s Church v. City of N.Y., 914 F.2d 348, 360 (2d Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). The third element of the test examines
holding that first amendment barred child victim of sexual abuse by priest from bringing breach of fiduciary duty claim against priest church official and church holding that a church was entitled to employ only members of its faith holding the federal unemployment tax act section exempting service performed in employ of church after which florida molded its unemployment law was meant to apply to schools that have no separate legal existence from the church and therefore employees working within such schools are in employ of the church holding that members of a church congregation lacked sufficient interest to support intervention in an action by the church itself challenging the designation of the church as a landmark holding that disaffiliated church had de facto dissolved when last vote of its full membership was to dissolve and to transfer assets to mother church