322 Ga. App. 190, 192 (2) (a) (744 SE2d 413) (2013). 16 Walton v. State, 293 Ga. 607, 609 (2) (748 SE2d 866) (2013); accord Stockard v. State, 327 Ga. App. 184, 185 (761 SE2d 351) (2014). 17 Thompson v. State, 277 Ga. 102, 103 (1) (586 SE2d 231) (2003). 18 Davis v. State, 328 Ga. App. 796, 797-98 (1) (760 SE2d 728) (2014) (punctuationomitted); see Graham v. State, 275 Ga. 290, 292 (2) (565 SE2d 467) (2002) (noting that whether venue has been properly proved is a question of fact for the jury). 19 Walton, 293 Ga. at 609 (2). 20 See O’Donnell v. Smith, 294 Ga. 307, 311-12 (2) (a) (751 SE2d 324) (2013) (finding proof of venue sufficient when the “jury heard testimony that the victim was found lying down and injured in Fulton County”). 21 Id. at 312 (2) (a). 22 See id. at 311-12 (2) (a) (<HOLDING>). Compare Jones, 272 Ga. at 903-04 (3) (finding
holding that state proved venue for murder when victims body was found in fulton county and scene of stabbing appeared to be within 100 yards from where body was found holding that evidence that victims body was found naked that victim had been seen pushing the defendant away before she was shot and that there were possible finger marks on one of the victims thighs was insufficient evidence to support attemptedrape conviction holding that where the murder and robbery occurred in one county but the plan was hatched in another county and the body was subsequently returned to that other county both counties had jurisdiction to try the appellant holding that both saline county and grant county had jurisdiction to try the appellant for murder where the actual killing occurred in one county but the acts requisite to the consummation of the murder and the subsequent disposal of the body occurred in the other county holding that where a defendant abandoned a vehicle in a subdivision near where the victims body was found there was sufficient evidence of intent to permanently deprive the owner of the vehicle