is his allegation that UNC failed to follow its own procedures, as outlined in the Instrument, by prematurely reporting his violations of NCAA regulations. Because Plaintiff has not alleged an injury in fact, we conclude his claims are non-justiciable since he does not have standing to raise a claim under the Instrument. See Neuse River Foundation, Inc., 155 N.C. App. at 114, 574 S.E.2d at 51-52. In North Carolina, individuals have full due process protection against the actions of state actors, such as public universities. See State v. Strickland, 169 N.C. App. 193, 195-96, 609 S.E.2d 253, 254-55 (2005). A state actor violates due process when it fails to follow its own rules and procedures. See McLean v. Mecklenburg County, 116 N.C. App. 431, 434-35, 448 S.E.2d 137, 139 (1994) (<HOLDING>). Here, UNC is a state actor because it is a
holding that the postal service was not required to follow notice and comment rulemaking procedures holding a county police civil service board violated officers due process rights by failing to follow its own procedures in their termination proceedings holding that va must follow its own regulations holding that due process rights were not violated by the district court failing to expressly articulate that it was imposing sanctions pursuant to its inherent power holding that the searching officers failed to follow the departments own procedures by failing to make a record of all property within the inventoried vehicle