deciding) that this constitutes an ameliorative factor, it is outweighed by the other factors already discussed. 5 . This rules authorizes courts to "conduct hearings or make referrals—preserving any federal statutory right to a jury trial—when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to: (A) conduct an accounting; (B) determine the amount of damages; (C) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or (D) investigate any other matter.” 6 . Specifically, the complaint alleges that Aer-omed owes (1) $50,611.11 to Hawke Aerospace; (2) $31,950.00 to Hawke Aircraft; (3) $426, 093.60 to Keystone; and (4) 40,000 to Uniflight. Docket # 1 ¶ 3.5; see also id. (“This outstanding balance owed by the defendant is liquid, due and payable.”). 7 . But cf. KPS & Associates, 318 F.3d at 20-21
holding that district court abused its discretion in denying rule 60b1 motion without conducting equitable analysis holding district court abused its discretion by entering default judgment where attorney caused delay and sanctions short of default such as costs attorneys fees or contempt of court would have likely cured the attorneys failure to respond holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by entering default judgment without first holding evidentiary hearing where there was no uncertainty about the amounts at issue the pleadings contained specific dollar figures and the court requested and received affidavits in support of the default judgment holding that district court abused discretion by entering default judgment in amount stated in complaint without conducting an evidentiary hearing or making further inquiry where the requested amount contained inconsistencies and mathematical errors and was internally inconsistent with supporting documents holding that district courts order granting motion for default judgment was erroneous  because a default judgment cannot be entered until the amount of damages has been ascertained 