restitution. Restitution, like fines, is a form of punishment. State v. Hart, 299 Or 128, 138-39, 699 P2d 1113 (1985). In Southern Union Co., the potential amount of the fine ranged from $50,000 to $38.1 million and depended upon the trial court determining the predicate fact (number of days of violation) in order to arrive at the amount to award. Similarly, in defendant’s view, the statutory maximum for restitution can range from zero to an “indeterminate, potentially vast amount” and depends upon the trial court determining predicate facts (the amount of the victim’s damages) in order to arrive at the amount to award. So viewed, the statutory maximum allows for a range of restitution awards, as did the statutorily uncertain fine in 564 (2012), aff'd, 354 Or 222, 311 P3d 510 (2013) (<HOLDING>); State v. Hval, 174 Or App 164, 181, 25 P3d
holding that criminal defendant was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under ors 137106 holding juvenile court under statutes then in effect could not acquire jurisdiction in delinquency proceeding in the absence of a delinquency petition filed by the probation officer under an order of the court authorizing the same holding that youth in juvenile delinquency proceeding was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under ors 419c450 holding that a delinquency proceeding places a juvenile in jeopardy for purposes of the double jeopardy clause holding that criminal defendant was not entitled to a jury trial on the issue of restitution under the oregon vehicle code