it comes to enforcing a child support order. Perhaps attorney fees were left out of section 600B.37 by legislative oversight — a ease of “casus omissus.” But even if this is a case of casus omissus, “we- have no right to supply the defect. The right to legislate is in the legislature and not in us.” Ctr. Twp. Sch. Dist. by Rollins v. Oakland Indep. Sch. Dist., 25S Iowa 391, 112 N.W.2d 665, 671 (Iowa 1962). For these reasons, the district court correctly denied Myers’s request for attorney fees, AFFIRMED. 1 . Myers filed a notice of appeal to challenge the attorney fee ruling following the contempt action. If Cosby had opted to challenge the contempt finding and jail sentence, his remedy would have been certiorari. See generally In re Marriage of Welsher, 274 N.W.2d 369, 371 (Iowa 1979) (<HOLDING>). If the court had not found Cosby in contempt,
holding no appeal lies for order to punish for contempt recognizing inherent power of supreme court independent of statutory authority to punish for contempt of court holding that mothers failure to appeal prior contempt order precluded her challenge to prior order in appeal from later order entered based upon prior contempt order holding that it is a well established rule that the power to judge a contempt rests exclusively with the court contemned and that no court is authorized to punish a contempt against another court holding that this court has inherent as well as express statutory authority to punish for contempt