exculpatory information prior to the transfer hearing. He contends that this information could have been used to defeat the Family Division’s finding of probable cause. “[Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused upon request violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution.” Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87, 83 S. Ct. 1194, 10 L. Ed. 2d 215 (1963). Brady material must be presented to a defendant, including a minor, prior to trial. N.G., 119 F. Supp. 2d at 528-29. There is no right, however, to receive Brady material prior to a probable cause or transfer hearing. Id.; see also Gov’t of the V.I. ex rel. A.I.E., 120 F. Supp. 2d 537, 545 (D.V.I. App. Div. 2000) (<HOLDING>). So long as such information is provided to
holding that a juvenile  has no entitlement to brady materials before the transfer hearing proceeding holding that a juvenile has a right to a voluntariness hearing in a transfer proceeding holding that juvenile court has no jurisdiction to consider constitutional claims holding that statute allowing for transfer of juvenile to adult criminal court does not implicate apprendi because the judges transfer determination does not subject the juvenile to enhanced punishment it subjects the juvenile to the adult criminal justice system holding that post conviction hearing act is not available to juvenile proceeding since the child is not convicted of a crime