petition for review challenging the IJ’s decision to deny cancellation of removal. PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED i that "[njotwithstanding any other provision of law ... no court shall have jurisdiction to review (i) any judgment regarding the grant of relief under section ... 1229b [cancellation of removal]”); see also Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003) (citing Montero-Martinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir.2002)) (interpreting 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) to "encompass all discretionary decisions involved in the cancellation of removal context, including the ultimate discretionary decision to deny relief”). 5 . See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.2005). 6 . See Sanchez-Cruz v. INS, 255 F.3d 775, 779-80 (9th Cir.2001)
holding that we could not review an aliens colorable due process claim that an ij was not impartial because the alien raised the claim for the first time on appeal holding that a claim not raised before the trial court will not be considered for the first time on appeal holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that generally appellate courts will not review an issue raised for the first time on appeal holding that because a claim was never raised in the district court this court would not consider it for the first time on appeal