of the area in which appellant committed the crime. The prosecutor stated: If you’re not seeing that (the selling of cocaine on the street) every day, the danger is to pretend that it doesn’t happen or it’s not affecting you, it’s not my problem, I don’t five on Cherrydale, that’s not my house, that is not my neighborhood. As a prerequisite to presenting a complaint for appellate review, the record must show that the complaint was made to the trial court by a timely request, objection, or motion. Tex.R.App. P. 38.1(a)(1). A defendant’s failure to object to a jury argument forfeits his right to complain about the argument on appeal. Cockrell v. State, 933 S.W.2d 73, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1996); see also Bias v. State, 937 S.W.2d 141, 144 (Tex.App. — Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Appellant did not object to this part of the
holding that to preserve an issue for appellate review the specific legal argument or ground upon which it is based must be presented to the trial court holding that there was no prejudice when evidence complained of would have been admissible against defendant in separate trial recognizing that the specific argument regarding an issue must be made in the trial court to preserve that issue for appellate review holding that there is no due process right to appellate review holding there is no issue presented for review when no objection is made even though the complained of argument might be incurably harmful