is defined as, "any impairment of physical condition, including physical pain." Ind. Code § 35-41-1-4 (1998). The State does not have to prove that the victim suffered physical pain in order to prove that there was bodily injury. Tucker v. State, 725 N.E.2d 894, 897-898 (Ind.Ct.App.2000), trans. denied. McKenzie testified that Johnson jumped on thirteen-year-old A.J., repeatedly hit A.J. with her fists, knocked her down, dragged her down three concrete steps, and continued to hit her when she was on the sidewalk. McKenzie also testified that A.J. had a "busted lip," was bleeding from her mouth, and had a bruise on her head, which caused it to hurt. McKenzie's - uncorroborated - testimony alone is sufficient to prove the element of bodily injury. See, e.g., Toney, 715 N.E.2d at 369 (<HOLDING>); C.T.S. v. State, 781 N.E.2d 1193, 1202
holding that uncorroborated accomplice testimony may provide the exclusive basis for a criminal conviction holding that uncorroborated testimony of one witness is sufficient by itself to sustain a conviction holding proof of possession of stolen goods is sufficient evidence to sustain conviction for theft holding that the uncorroborated testimony of an informant may be sufficient to sustain a conviction recognizing that if there is evidence upon which one may reasonably infer an element of the crime the evidence is sufficient to sustain that element and where reasonable minds could differ the evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction