license, and any permit, firearms identification card, license, certification, certificate, form of register, of registration statement [ ]• maintained by any State or municipal-governmental agency. Pursuant to Executive Order No. 9 (Sept. 30, 1963), the Attorney General is one of the State-government officials specifically authorized to adopt regulations exempting records from disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law. As a consequence -of 0the Attorney General’s readoption of N.J.A.C. 13:54-1.15, the investigative-file documents clearly are exempted from public disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law, which renders moot plaintiffs claim of access to the documents pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law. See In re Application of Madin/Lord Land Dev. Int’l, 103 N.J. 689, 695, 512 A.2d 490 (1986) (<HOLDING>); In re “Plan For Orderly Withdrawal From New
holding court precluded from reviewing denial of motion for reconsideration where petitioner did not separately seek review of that decision holding that wjhere the right to compensation depends upon which of two conflicting medical theories should be accepted the issue is peculiarly for commissions determination holding that deference to the guidelines depends on the thoroughness of the commissions analysis and the validity of its reasoning holding that pinelands commissions new rules rendered moot the issue whether localplanning agency of uncertified municipality had right to seek commissions reconsideration in developmentapplication review process holding that a corporations payment of commissions to one of its owners was constructively fraudulent under dcl  273 and justified piercing the corporate veil because the commissions were inappropriately transferred for the owners personal use without compensation to the corporation apparently as part of a kickback scheme devised by the owner