approach and applied it in numerous cases,” they point to only one example: Certain Automotive Replacement Glass Windshields from the People’s Republic of China, 67 Fed.Reg. 6482, 6485 (Dep’t Commerce Feb. 12, 2002)(final determination). Id. This determination is not on point. Although, in that investigation, Commerce indicated that "consistent with its practice,” it would continue not to use market economy inputs "if they are insignificant or purchased outside of the period of investigation” the matter itself did not involve pre- or post-POI inputs. 67 Fed.Reg. at 6485. Instead, the issue there was whether the purchase of market economy inputs was "meaningful.” See e.g., Shakeproof Assembly Components Div. of Ill. Tool Works Inc. v. United States, 268 F.3d 1376, 1382 (Fed.Cir.2001)
holding merely that to the extent a breaching party claims that the appropriate measure of damages is the difference between the contract price and the market price it holds the burden of proving that there is in fact an available market for the goods in issue holding that when determining the proper amount for a burdened property that was purchased in a package only two methods suggest themselves as arguably appropriate 1 a determination of the fair market value of the  property burdened by the right of first refusal or 2 a determination of the portion of the  purchase price which based on the percentage of the fair market value of the entire package represented by the  property burdened by the right of first refusal should be allocated to the  property burdened by the right of first refusal recognizing that the factors of production for domestically purchased merchandise may be obtained by extrapolating the market economy import price only when a meaningful amount of merchandise is imported holding that the market price is understood to mean the current market price being paid for gas at the well where it is produced holding that the measure of damages for the breach of a contract of sale where no fraud is shown is the difference between the contract price and the market price of the goods on the date of the breach