the parties that the instruction, taken from the State’s complaint, was in error because it left out “or presence” and included the children’s names. The court, without objection, modified the instruction, stating also that the complaint was being modified to conform to the evidence by inserting tire phrase “or presence” and taking out the children’s names. K.S.A. 22-3201(e) allows a court to permit a complaint or information to be amended at any time before a verdict or finding if no additional or different crime is charged and if the substantial rights of the defendant are not prejudiced. Because the defendant did not object to the amendment by the court, he may not now complain of the effect of the amendment on appeal. See State v. Gardner, 264 Kan. 95, 106, 955 P.2d 1199 (1998) (<HOLDING>). Further, the defendant’s failure to object
holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal holding that a claim not raised before the trial court will not be considered for the first time on appeal holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal holding that errors not raised before the trial court will not generally be considered on appeal holding that an issue raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered by this court