recover damages or funds from the State treasury. Ex parte Alabama Dep’t of Mental Health & Mental Retardation, 937 So.2d 1018, 1023 (Ala.2006) (“Sovereign immunity bars claims against State agencies on the rationale that a damages award against a State agency would result in a monetary loss to the State treasury.”); Lyons, 858 So.2d at 262 (noting that a party could not bring an action against a State official, because “[s]uch an action impermissibly seeks funds from the State treasury”); Armory Comm’n of Alabama v. Staudt, 388 So.2d 991, 993-94 (Ala.1980) (stating that an action against the Armory Commission of Alabama was barred by § 14 because a judgment against it “would adversely affect the state treasury”); Southall v. Stricos Corp., 275 Ala. 156, 158, 153 So.2d 234, 235 (1963) (<HOLDING>); and Moody v. University of Alabama, 405 So.2d
holding that a declaratoryjudgment action against the state that would affect property in which the state had an interest was barred by  14 holding that an action against an officer was not an action against the state because the relief sought would not take away any property of the state or fasten a lien on it or interfere with the disposition of funds in the treasury holding that  14 prevents the state from being sued and a suit against the state  cannot be indirectly accomplished by suing its officers or agents in their official capacity when a result favorable to plaintiff would be directly to affect the financial status of the state treasury quoting state docks commn v barnes 225 ala 403 405 143 so 581 582 1932 holding that  14 prohibits the awarding of costs against the state as a defendant holding that  14 prevents an action against the state when a result favorable to the plaintiff would directly affect a contract or property right of the state