prior to the date of this Agreement in the District of South Carolina which are based on the same- act or transaction or constitute a part of a common scheme or plan as those cited herein. Rule 8(a), F.R.Crim.P. (J.A. at 49 (emphasis added).) Stone unsuccessfully moved to dismiss the Skylyn Hall indictment on the ground that paragraph 8 of the plea agreement barred prosecuting him for activities in connection with the Skylyn Hall bond issue. Stone argues that the indictment should have been dismissed because he intended for the plea agreement to absolve him from all of his fraudulent activities in relation to his development, construction, and operation of health care facilities in South Carolina. See Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 262, 92 S.Ct. 495, 498, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Jureidini, 846 F.2d 964,
holding that a defendants guilty plea was unconditional where the guilty plea was not in writing and the government did not consent to it being conditional holding that a defendant must have knowledge of the likely consequences of entering the guilty plea in order for a plea to be voluntary and knowing recognizing a presumption that a plea of guilty is final and binding if the plea was made during a properly conducted hearing pursuant to rule 11 of the federal rules of criminal procedure holding that the defendant is not entitled to be sentenced by the judge who took his plea when the judge made no promise to sentence him holding that the government must be held to a promise made to a defendant during plea negotiations if that promise induced the defendants guilty plea