words, a point on appeal based on a trial court’s ruling on a motion, request, or objection must be supported by a showing in the record that the motion, request, or objection was presented to and acted upon by the trial court. See, e.g., Ballard v. King, 652 S.W.2d 767, 769 (Tex.1983); Temple EasTex, Inc. v. Old Orchard Creek Partners, Ltd., 848 S.W.2d 724, 736 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1992, writ denied) (interpreting Tex.R.App. P. 52(a) (Vernon Pamph. 1997, revised 1997)); Anderson v. Higdon, 695 S.W.2d 320, 326 (Tex.App.—Waco 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.). In general, a docket entry forms no part of the record which may be considered; it is a memorandum made for the clerk’s and trial court’s convenience. See Jauregui Partners, Ltd. v. Grubb & Ellis Commercial Real Estate Servs., 960 S at 190 (<HOLDING>). Some courts, however, have also denied review
holding that appellant failed to preserve error for appeal where only indication that trial court ruled on a motion to transfer venue was a docket sheet notation holding trial court did not abuse discretion in denying motion for new trial by operation of law because motion was not properly presented even though a notice of presentment was filed and the docket sheet contained an entry for the motion having been filed holding that voidness of summary judgment in defamation case could be asserted for first time on appeal only if trial court lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction to render judgment and concluding court had jurisdiction holding that court lacked jurisdiction for appeal where only evidence of application for turnover relief was in the trial courts docket sheet holding in pertinent part that this court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal