briefing, the court construes her papers to contend that the officers’ disciplinary history should have put the City on notice of a “potentiálly serious problem of unconstitutional conduct.” Amnesty Am., 361 F.3d at 128. However, the information contained therein does not sustain a Monell claim. The only allegation that appears to involve an arrest potentially made without probable cause is a single disputed arrest allegation brought against Defendant P.O. Lestrade in July 2006. (Discip. Records at 13.) This isolated incident does not amount to the “repeated complaints of civil rights violations” that have been held sufficient to establish an “obvious” need for increased supervision. Vann, 72 F.3d at 1049. Compare Ricciuti v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth., 941 F.2d 119, 121, 124 (2d Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>), and Fiasco v. City of Rensselaer, N.Y., 783
holding that a motion to dismiss based on a forumselection clause should be treated as a rule 12b3 motion to dismiss for improper venue holding that the finding of less than a half pound of marijuana alone was not sufficient to withstand a motion to dismiss holding a dozen or more instances of alleged conceded or adjudicated improper arrests over fourteenyearperiod including nine instances in the five years leading up to plaintiffs contested arrest sufficient to withstand motion to dismiss holding that evidence was sufficient to withstand a motion for acquittal where the threateninglanguage was not ambiguous recognizing that a court may deny a motion to amend as futile if the proposed amendment would not withstand a motion to dismiss quotations and citation omitted