it because I want you to know.' When he was little, his family was very poor and they moved around a lot.... He had no control over that. That was something that happened and here after we bury him, he is still moved out of his control [sic]. And that’s been very difficult. We had to go make a decision to exhume, to find dad if he was there [sic] and that was hard. We didn’t want to go through that again. Esthe 002) (reasoning that the evidence of mental anguish was sufficient where the plaintiffs family was disrupted and he lost sleep and was depressed). The evidence shows Mrs. Guerra was suffering from insomnia and stomach pains. She was also on medication for depression and anxiety. Her injuries were further confirmed by the testimony of her daughter. See Parkway, 901 S.W.2d at 444 (<HOLDING>). And although the testimony of the Guerra
holding that mental anguish can be established by the testimony of third parties holding the family court has jurisdiction to join third parties when property is alleged to be marital but is owned by a third party holding that unconstitutional government action can only be challenged by a person directly affected it cannot be challenged by one invoicing the rights of third parties holding there is no duty to third parties on the part of a premises owner who could not have foreseen the criminal acts of third parties recognizing that either party to a divorce action may bring in third parties who claim an interest in the property alleged to be community or third parties themselves may intervene and have their rights therein determined