since it is not a judgment of “not guilty” on that charge. Rule 7-701 NMRA (“If the defendant has been acquitted, a judgment of not guilty shall be rendered.”). {19} New Mexico cases address similar circumstances in the context of sentencing. Where a defendant is on notice that the trial court’s oral sentence was not final, he has no reasonable expectation of finality. State v. Rushing, 103 N.M. 333, 706 P.2d 875 (1985). Double jeopardy considerations “exist to protect a defendant’s expectations of finality without providing ... [him] with the right to know at any specific moment in time what the exact limit of his punishment will turn out to be.” Id. at 335, 706 P.2d at 877 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Angel, 2002-NMSC-025, ¶ 15, 132 N.M. 501, 51 P.3d 1155 (<HOLDING>). Here, where Defendant specifically asked the
holding that a defendant must have knowledge of the likely consequences of entering the guilty plea in order for a plea to be voluntary and knowing holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to withdraw guilty plea filed three weeks after entering the plea holding that a defendants expectations of finality after entering a nocontest plea were outweighed by states right to a full and fair opportunity to convict criminals holding that entering a guilty plea is an admission of guilt and a waiver of the right to jury trial holding that a motion to withdraw a guilty or nocontest plea is a presenlence motion if the sentence was void for lack of postreleasecontrol notification