(federal collateral review of habeas-corpus petitioner’s Fourth Amendment claim was foreclosed by Stone v. Powell because the petitioner failed to “clearly present[ ] his Fourth Amendment claim” on direct appeal; thus, petitioner could not complain that the court of appeals, on direct review, failed to discuss the constitutional require ments of Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 583-87,100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639 (1980)); Brunson v. Higgins, 708 F.2d 1353, 1361 (8th Cir.1983) (although petitioner raised Fourth Amendment issue in the trial court, he did not do so on direct appeal; his “failure to raise the Fourth Amendment issue on appeal cannot prevent the application of the Stone v. Powell doctrine”); United States ex rel. Barksdale v. Sielaff, 585 F.2d 288, 292-93 (7th Cir.1978) (<HOLDING>); Dabbs v. Crosby, No. 303CV953J12MCR, 2005 WL
holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that where the fourth amendment question was raised at trial but not preserved on direct appeal in the state court the defendants failure to raise the issue on appeal in the state courts did not suffice to avoid stone holding party may not argue one ground at trial and another on appeal where appellant did not object to testimony at trial on the grounds raised on appeal that it was improper character evidence but objected only on the basis of relevancy issue was not preserved for review holding issue not raised in the bankruptcy court was waived on appeal holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it  