dispute over the northern part of Tract 2 with Daner Cheshire, one of Mary’s two heirs, acquired a deed conveying his interest in the property, and dismissed him from this suit; and Lyndon Cheshire, Mary’s other heir, who remains in the suit, claims that title to the Disputed Property still lies in Cecil’s estate. Under the Texas Probate Code, “if a person dies leaving a lawful will [... ] all of the person’s estate that is devised by the will vests immediately in the devisees” and “all of the person’s estate that is not devised by the will vests immediately in the person’s heirs at law.” Tex. Estates Code Ann. § 101.001(a)(1), (a)(3) (Vernon 2014) (formerly Tex. Probate Code § 37); see Jones v. Gilliam, 199 S.W. 694, 696 (Tex.Civ.App.1917), aff'd, 109 Tex. 552, 212 S.W. 930 (1919) (<HOLDING>). The Code further provides that, upon
holding that title to land vests in decedents heirs not in his administrator holding that even if a thirdparty administrator is not a fiduciary under erisa such an administrator still has standing  pursuant to   1331 recognizing general proposition that if land is artificially submerged for the statutory period necessary to change ownership of the land title to the submerged land is passed to the state in trust for the public recognizing general rule but holding it did not apply where an administrator was named as a nominal defendant in a suit litigating conflicting claims among heirs recognizing that one cannot have an easement in his own land