schools with the proportions of the races in the district as a whole.” Id. at 474, 112 S.Ct. 1430. In historically segregated school systems, the Supreme Court has held, “where it is possible to identify a ‘white school’ or a ‘Negro school’ simply by reference to the racial composition of teachers and staff, the quality of school buildings and equipment, or the organization of sports activities, a prima facie case of violation of substantive constitutional rights under the Equal Protection Clause is shown.” Swann, 402 U.S. at 18, 91 S.Ct. 1267. The burden then shifts to the school district to demonstrate that the racial imbalances are “not the result of present or past discriminatory action on their part.” Id. at 26, 91 S.Ct. 1267; accord Freeman, 503 U.S. at 494, 112 S.Ct. 1430 (<HOLDING>); Jacksonville NAACP, 273 F.3d at 966; Manning,
holding that a school district was not liable for sexual molestation of plaintiffs daughter by a teacher even though the acts occurred on school property and during school hours holding school districts had standing to bring claims against the state asserting that school financing system had become unconstitutional holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials holding that in a formerly de jure segregated school system the school district bears the burden of showing that any current imbalance is not traceable in a proximate way to the prior violation holding that a school district owed the highest degree of care to a student on a school bus such that the district could be liable for the sexual abuse of the student by the school bus driver