as a preferential transfer during the claim-allowance process. Furthermore, failing to raise that objection does not preclude Plaintiff from raising it at this time. Section 502(d) is a shield — “if the trustee fails to raise the § 502(d) shield, he does not thereby drop the sword sheathed in § 547.” In re Cambridge Industries Holdings, Inc., 2006 WL 516764 at *2. 1 . It is noted that, while Trustee’s original objection to Morris’s claim was brought informally, a Consent Order was ultimately entered by this Court, and so for all intents and purposes, this Court’s reasoning would apply equally were the matter originally objected through a motion brought by the Trustee. 2 .See Caliolo v. Azdel, Inc. (In re Cambridge Indus. Holdings, Inc.), 2003 WL 21697190 (Bankr.D.Del. July 18, 2003) (<HOLDING>); Caliolo v. TKA Fabco Corp. (In re Cambridge
holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee holding defendant to a preference action has a right to a jury trial pursuant to the seventh amendment of the united states constitution but that right can be waived by filing a claim in the bankruptcy proceedings holding that parties waived any choice of law objection by not raising an objection holding that party waived an objection to choice of law holding trustee has waived the right to bring a preference objection