CURIAM. Larry Marshall appeals the order denying his motion seeking to vacate his sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(b)(2), which provides an exception to the two-year time limit for filing a postconviction motion on the ground that a newly-established constitutional right has been held to apply retroactively. We reverse and remand for re-sentencing. In his motion, Marshall argued that his concurrent sentences of ninety-nine years’ imprisonment for breaking and entering and robbery, which were imposed in 1976, are de facto life sentences that are unconstitutional under Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), as interpreted by our supreme court in Henry v. State, 175 So.3d 675, 680 (Fla. 2015) (<HOLDING>), and Gridine v. State, 175 So.3d 672, 673
holding that due process requires at a minimum an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner holding that graham prohibits sentencing juvenile nonhomicide offenders to sentences that ensure their imprisonment without a meaningful opportunity for release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation holding plaintiff must prove that he or she was deprived of  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case holding that constitution requires  an opportunity  granted at a meaningful time and a meaningful manner  for a hearing appropriate to the nature of the case holding that procedural due process requires adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard