(<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
holding an attorney is an agent of the client and therefore cannot conspire with the client holding trial court erred when it sanctioned client where the evidence showed that the attorney filed frivolous pleadings on behalf of the client but the client did nothing more than rely on her attorneys advice holding that an attorney may only undertake to represent a new client against a former client  where there is no confidential information received from the former client that is in any way relevant to representation of the current client holding client is not liable for actions of attorney who misled client as to the status of case holding that when an attorney represents multiple clients and a dispute between the attorney and one client later occurs there is a waiver of the privilege but only by the client asserting the liability