the residential program. The remain der of the terms and conditions of the disposition order are affirmed. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED. GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, R. B, JJ., concur. 1 . We affirm the remaining issues advanced by I.B. on appeal without discussion. 2 . Fearing that this legislative change left juveniles without a procedure to correct unpre-served disposition errors that did not constitute fundamental error, the Florida Supreme Court adopted ) (concluding that juvenile could not be sentenced to commitment not to exceed 364 days followed by post-commitment community control not to exceed 364 days for battery, where maximum term that juvenile could have received for offense as an adult was one year); see also J.G. v. State, 783 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Some Florida courts have held that
holding that state may not subject indigent defendants to period of imprisonment beyond statutory maximum holding pursuant to section 985231 ld florida statutes 1999 that duration of commitment which includes any period in an aftercare program may not exceed the statutory maximum for the offense holding apprendi is not implicated where sentence does not exceed statutory maximum sentence authorized for the offense in its simplest form holding that a defendant could not assert an error under apprendi v new jersey because his sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum holding that restitution in the full amount of each victims losses does not exceed the statutory maximum