nature of the large metal object had anything to do with her injuries. She has alleged the bus owner, COLT, [and Lebanon Coach] should not have left her or any other children get off the bus at the accident site. The “motor vehicle” exception to immunity does not apply to these facts.... (Trial Court Opinion at 7) (citing Lehman v. County of Lebanon Transportation Authority, No. 89-01796, November 9, 1990, Opinion by Eby, J. at 9-10). The trial court concluded that the Lehmans’ claims arose from administrative decisions by the defendants COLT and Lebanon Coach and that the accident involving Paula Jo Lehman was not the result of the “ownership, maintenance or use of a covered bus.” Relying on Metzel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 38 per. 462, 640 A.2d 1352 (1994) (<HOLDING>); Fisher v. Harleysville Insurance Company, 423
holding mrs frain was occupying her friends parked car when she stumbled over flowerbed and sustained injuries to avoid being run over by oncoming tractor trailer before entering friends car holding um policy provider was the proper source of loss benefits for injuries sustained when claimants car was struck while he was seated in his car with his left foot still on the ground holding that there was probable cause for arrest where officers knew defendants had recently been with suspected drug dealer officers saw defendants car being maneuvered so as to indicate that surveillance had been detected and when officers approached car defendant attempted to place package under car and then pulled the package back inside the car and closed and locked the car door holding mr contrisciane was occupying his insured vehicle when he was struck and killed by an uninsured vehicle after leaving his car to walk over to patrol car with his drivers information as directed by police officer holding that liability insurance covered the injuries sustained when claimant exited car and was struck by a live wire since the claimant was still occupying the vehicle