proven that the child has the capacity to form criminal intent, and that felony murder based on this statute should not apply to children under fourteen tried as an adult because children of this age cannot reasonably be held criminally responsible as an adult for aggravated child abuse. The amicus briefs filed in this appeal address several sociological and scientific principles and argue that there is no proof that a' child of Tate’s age possesses an adult capacity to form a criminal intent. The legislature, however,'has supplanted the common law defense of’“infancy” with a statutory scheme, which includes section 985.225, specifying when a juvenile is capable of committing a crime under which he or she should be treated as an adult. See State v. D.H., 340 So.2d 1163, 1165 (Fla.1976)(<HOLDING>). The state also notes that not only is there
holding that the common law presumption of incapacity of a minor between the ages of seven and fourteen years to commit a crime no longer applies recognizing presumption holding that although the presumption of correctness applies to the ultimate classification decision  the presumption carries no force as to questions of law holding that a common law presumption of death is triggered after an absence of seven years holding that the crime of attempted felony murder no longer existed in florida