adversary proceedings do not appear to be material. Objections to fee applications are contested matters that, unless the Court orders otherwise, are governed by many of the disclosure and discovery rules applicable in adversary proceedings. Fed. R. Bankr.P. 9014. If Costa’s objections become adversary proceedings pursuant to Rule 3007, then all of the disclosure, discovery, and procedural provisions of Part VII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (“Part VII”) will apply. Since the Court can order that all of the Part VII procedural rules apply in contested matters and the burden of proof will be the same, no party should be prejudiced by the objections being decided as contested matters. See Fleet Nat’l Bank v. Valente (In re Valente), 360 F.3d 256, 265 (1st Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). Rule 7015 regarding amendment of pleadings is
holding that standard of review is a matter of procedural rather than substantive law holding that as a matter of law claim stated in amended complaint did not relate back to original complaint holding that judgment as a matter of law was proper when the plaintiff did not present any evidence that the defendant was motivated by the eeoc complaint knowledge is necessary to establish causation but it is not sufficient holding that although the matter should have been initiated by a complaint rather than a motion the debtor was not prejudiced by proceeding as a contested matter holding that the district court has broad authority to take jurisdiction over a matter even when that matter is not brought by a real party in interest