generally that he “challenges” numerous findings of fact, including these two, but does not individually address them or cite to any contrary evidence in the record. 10 . We find Mr. Waite's affidavit to be in stark contrast to that in Gonzalez, v. Gonzalez, in which the court found that the former wife supported her claim of financial duress with an affidavit in which she stated that she was destitute and had no income, had lost her job, had to sell her car for a specified amount, used her property as collateral to borrow money, and provided a detailed list of the amounts of her debts and expenses. See Gonzalez, 614 S.W.2d at 204 n. 1. 11 .The other divorce cases he cited were similarly distinguishable. See Hands v. Holland, 867 S.W.2d 86, 87 n. 1 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1993, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Gonzalez, 614 S.W.2d at 204 (holding
holding however that venue was proper under the third statutory basis because it was likely that had plaintiff received one of the positions he sought he would have been assigned to work in the district of columbia at some point holding that an asylum applicant must show at least a deliberate imposition of a substantial economic disadvantage in order for the harm to constitute economic persecution holding appellant not estopped when at least some of cash was accepted because of economic necessity and a redivision of the property would not affect her right to the cash received holding that economic loss rule precludes recovery of economic damages only in the absence of personal injury or property  damage claims holding wife was not prejudiced by the trial courts refusal to consider the tax consequences of assets awarded to her in part because it did not affect the overall property distribution