II claims based on accessibility to public education. In Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Florida International University, 405 F.3d 954 (11th Cir.2005), the Eleventh Circuit expanded the holding of Lane to find that Title II of the ADA is valid legislation enacted pursuant to § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment as applied to public higher education, and that the Eleventh Amendment does not pose a bar to claims against the states under Title II of the ADA for such claims. Id. at 959. Association for Disabled Americans is not controlling in this case, however, as it did not address employment discrimination claims under Title II. 11 . Predictably, courts outside this circuit have split on this issue as well. Compare Alsbrook v. City of Maumelle, 184 F.3d 999, 1010 (8th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>) with Coolbaugh v. Louisiana, 136 F.3d 430 (5th
holding that title ii does not apply to the states holding that title ii of the ada is not applicable to the federal government recognizing that most other courts apply title vii principles to title ix cases but refusing to apply title viis knew or should have known standard to a title ix claim holding that title ii of the ada was a valid use of congress power under section 5 of the fourteenth amendment holding that prudential limitations on standing do not apply to title ii ada claims