Aug. 2, 1995) (unpublished opinion) (finding that the court lacked jurisdiction to refund defendant’s restitution payments because the money had been disbursed to another party not before the court). The district court lacks jurisdiction over the Industrial Commission even though it is a state agency and this is a criminal proceeding brought by the State. While county attorneys may perform executive functions, they are officers of the judicial branch. State v. Wharfield, 41 Idaho 14, 17, 236 P. 862, 862-63 (1925) (discussing Idaho Const, art. V, § 18 (1896)). When a county prosecutor charges a defendant in a criminal proceeding, he or she is exercising the State’s inherent sovereign power to prosecute crime. Cf. United States v. Singleton, 165 F.3d 1297, 1300 (10th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); La. State Bd. of Nursing v. Gautreaux, 39
recognizing the delegation of authority to the united states attorneys holding an alter ego action could be brought by the debtor corporation under texas law holding that sovereign immunity bars an attorneys lien against the united states holding that the us attorneys office is the alter ego of the united states exercising its sovereign power of prosecution holding that alter ego is shown from the total dealings of the corporation