that the defendant heard them. More importantly, there is absolutely no evidence in the record that the event provoked any feelings on the part of the defendant. And absent that evidence, the Court finds a lack of a serious evidentiary dispute. Tr. at 575-76. Aguilar contends that his arguments and altercations with Michael, several hours before the murder, were sufficient provocation to engender passion. However, the record indicates that Aguilar returned to Michael's apartment after their altercation in the bar, retrieved a knife from her kitchen, donned latex gloves, hid in her bathroom, waited several hours for her return, and stabbed her to death. This evidence does not support an inference that Aguilar acted under sudden heat. See Horan v. State, 682 N.E.2d 502, 507 (Ind.1997) (<HOLDING>); see also Culver, 727 N.E.2d at 1071 (noting
holding that the relevant time is the time of the employment decision holding that evidence was insufficient to support determination that defendant acted in sudden heat where sufficient time elapsed affording defendant time for cool reflection holding that evidence was insufficient to prove constructive possession where the defendant was in jail at the time the drugs were seized from his residence holding that the time to disposition is more important than time to trial holding evidence insufficient to support finding of implied contract