supervised, and boasted about her involvement in the May 11 robbery; (2) video surveillance of the robbery showed a woman who physically resembled Thomas brandishing a firearm during the robbery; (3) Levatte identified the woman brandishing a firearm in the video as Thomas; and (4) the victim of the May 11 robbery gave eyewitness testimony that the woman Levatte identified as Thomas appeared to be leading and orchestrating the robbery. This is not a case in which the evidence of Thomas’s guilt was merely “circumstantial without [her] statements.” Cf. United States v. Ramsey, 992 F.2d 301, 306 (11th Cir.1993), abrogated on other grounds by, Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452, 114 S.Ct. 2350, 129 L.Ed.2d 362 (1994); cf. also United States v. Lall, 607 F.3d 1277, 1293 (11th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>); Hart, 323 F.3d at 895 (finding Miranda error
holding erroneous admission of evidence not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where the only other evidence against defendant was the uncorroborated testimony of a cooperating witness of questionable credibility holding any error in admitting testimony of expert witness was harmless because it was cumulative of same testimony given by six other expert witnesses who testified at trial holding error in admission of evidence is harmless when it was merely cumulative to other evidence in the record holding a miranda violation was not harmless error when the only other inculpatory evidence was the testimony of a single cooperating witness who claimed to have conspired with the defendant holding any error in admitting eye witness testimony was harmless because it was cumulative to other overwhelming evidence that established defendants guilt