Corp. v. United States Chemical Co., 43 F.3d 244, 250 (6th Cir.1994). Summary judgment is appropriate “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); Pierce v. Commonwealth Life Ins. Co., 40 F.3d 796, 800 (6th Cir.1994). III. Under the Supremacy Clause, “the Laws of the United States ... shall be the supreme Law of the Land ... any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” U.S. Const, art. VI, cl. 2. The Supreme Court summarized ways in which federal law preempts other legislation under thi Supp. 823, 826 (W.D.Mich. 1987) (<HOLDING>). The challenged ordinance was promulgated
holding that municipal ordinance was preempted by frsa and void under supremacy clause recognizing that the supremacy clause does not of its own force create rights recognizing that the supremacy clause is not a source of any federal rights holding annexation ordinance void holding the frsa preemption exception did not cover regulation by municipal ordinance