reason, title to the goods reverts to the seller. Cal. Com.Code § 2401(4) (providing that “[a] rejection or other refusal by the buyer to receive or retain the goods, whether or not justified, or a justified revocation of acceptance revests title to the goods in the seller ... by operation of law.”). See also In re Pac. Express, Inc., 780 F.2d 1482, 1489 (9th Cir.1986) (applying California law and concluding that title revested in the seller when the buyer refused to retain the goods after delivery); Aztec Energy Partners, Inc. v. Sensor Switch, Inc., 531 F.Supp.2d 226, 230 (D.Conn.2007) (concluding that under UCC § 2-401(4) if the buyer returned the goods for any reason to the seller, title revested in the seller); Shelby Int’l, Inc. v. Wiener, 563 S.W.2d 324, 328 (Tex.Civ.App.1978) (<HOLDING>). Because the Debtor had title to the returned
holding that breach occurred when seller told buyer that seller would do no more to rectify alleged warranty violation holding that where buyer had opportunity to inspect goods and failed to inform seller in timely manner of defects buyer deemed to have accepted goods pursuant to  672606 holding that seller was entitled to recover contract price of goods where buyer failed to make effective rejection under the ucc holding that title revested in seller under california law when buyer revoked his acceptance of goods holding that seller carried insurance for benefit of buyer and held proceeds in trust for buyer when seller agreed to maintain insurance until possession date but bam burned before buyer took possession