court made a factual finding that the delay of 15 days between the time the second indictment should have been filed (May 19, 2002) and the date it was actually filed (June 4, 2002) was due to “negligence” and not to any “bad faith on the part of the Government.” The district court focused on the bad faith issue because it was the only issue argued by counsel. While the better practice would have been for counsel and the court below to specifically address all three factors of § 3162(a)(1), there is no need to remand this case because the record here is complete and allows us to make the necessary findings. United States v. Pena-Carrillo, 46 F.3d 879 (9th Cir.1995). Possession of a firearm by a felon is a serious offense. See United States v. Carnes, 309 F.3d 950, 957 (6th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>), cert, denied, 537 U.S. 1240, 123 S.Ct. 1371,
holding that armed robbery and being a felon in possession are serious offenses for section 91 purposes holding alford plea admissible in prosecution for felon in possession of firearm holding that double jeopardy precludes dual convictions for felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of separate ammunition because section 790231 florida statutes prohibits possession of  any firearm ammunition or electric weapon or device emphasis in original holding that possession of a firearm by a felon is a serious offense for  3162a2 purposes holding that dual convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon violated double jeopardy