relief exact relief sought here. Armstrong I, 924 F.2d at 295. Although Armstrong I did not directly discuss the redressability element of standing, one cannot read Armstrong I and conclude that court did not believe that a private litigant who otherwise had standing would be unable to pursue such relief for lack of redressability. Hi. Visitor Records Are “Federal Records” Under the FRA Defendants’ final argument, made in several different forms, claims that the sought records are presidential records, not agency records, and therefore are covered by the PRA (which allows no private right of action against the Archivist), not the FRA. This Court has already reached the opposite conclusion in this case in relation to plaintiffs FOIA claims. CREW v. DHS, 527 F.Supp.2d 76, 98 (D.D.C.2007) (<HOLDING>). “For purposes of the PRA, presidential
holding that the visitor records at issue here continue to be agency records for purposes of foia even after they are transferred to the white house or ovp and internally destroyed holding that municipal court records were admissible under  official records or public documents  exception holding that records relating to a student court were not education records holding that copies of court records only had to be made available in an agency reading room the agency is not required by statute to mail copies of the records  nor even to provide a requesterconvenient location for access holding that seventeen missing records does not constitute improper record keeping because the fact that the records are not at the station does not mean that the records are incorrect or inaccurate