rate established by the association not exceeding 15% per year. 68 Pa.C.S. § 3314(b). Section 3302(a)(ll) permits condo associations to “[i]mpose charges for late payment of assessments and, after notice and opportunity to be heard, levy reasonable fines for violations of the declaration, bylaws and rules and regulations of the association.” 68 Pa.C.S. § 3302(a)(ll). The Association’s Rules and Regulations permit it to charge .a 10% late fee on any outstanding balance, which Robinson acknowledges. (Hr’g Tr. at 27-28, R.R. at 27a-28a; Robinson’s Br. at 27-28.) However, this Court has expressed some disapproval of charging a compounded rate as a monthly late-fee. Latch’s Lam Owners Association v. Bazargani (Pa.Cmwlth., 2408 C.D. 2009, filed April 13, 2010), slip op. at 6, 2010 WL 9516204 (<HOLDING>). Robinson contends that the charging of a
holding that it may not holding that a plaintiff who pled in her complaint that her law firm actively misled her in support of her request for application of the discovery rule had sufficiently pled the application of the doctrine holding that it did not violate the defendants right to remain silent when the prosecutor questioned her about inconsistencies between her pretrial statements to authorities and her defense at trial holding that plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint to add her husband as a defendant did not relate back because her failure to sue her husband was not due to misnomer or mistake involving the identity of the proper party but because the law at the time of the complaint did not allow one spouse to sue another in tort holding that although the calculations may appear to result in the association charging her 74 per year if it had levied a compounded charge of 7 per month on the overdue installment the condo association did not violate section 3314b because it only charged the owner a onetime penalty of 7 of her outstanding payment