for earnings that otherwise would be paid to and earned by the injured worker during the disability period after the marriage. There are no Arizona cases regarding the nature of workmen’s compensation received after the dissolution of marriage. No issue was raised in Jurek regarding the nature of workmen’s compensation, 124 Ariz. at 596 n. 1, 606 P.2d at 812 n. 1, nor the nature of future loss of earnings after dissolution. It is our opinion that such benefits paid to the injured worker after the dissolution of marriage for injuries received during the marriage are the separate property of the worker after the dissolution. According to general community property law principles, when a marriage is dissolved, the earnings of each individual after the dissol S.Ct. 802, 59 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979)
holding that military retirement benefits are current pay and thus significantly different than other retirement benefits holding disability benefits from us civil service are community property holding railroad retirement benefits are not community property by congressional action holding that employee spouses accrued but unvested retirement benefits are a contingent property interest and a community asset holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa