brought with respect to prison conditions under ... Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any ... correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”). The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires dismissal of civil actions regarding prison conditions if brought prior to the exhaustion of administrative remedies. Oladukun v. Winn, No. 04-40198-RWZ, 2005 WL 1972560, at *1, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17046, at *4 (D.Mass. Aug. 16, 2005) (Zobel, J.) (unpublished opinion). The Reform Act, however, does not apply to habeas proceedings. Kane, 319 F.Supp.2d at 213 n. 84. Even if the habe-as claim is the type of federal prisoner claim that requires exhaustion of administrative remedies, cf. Oladukun, 2005 WL 1972560, at *1-2, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17046, at *4-5 (<HOLDING>), because that exhaustion is not statutorily
holding that a claimants claim is barred when administrative remedies that are clearly required under an erisa plan are not exhausted holding that administrative remedies must be exhausted prior to filing a claim in court holding that if adequate administrative remedies are available it is improper to seek relief in court before those remedies are exhausted holding that judicial review of any jail time credit determination by the bureau occurs after administrative remedies are exhausted holding that we lack jurisdiction to consider claims raised in a petition for review unless the petitioner has exhausted his administrative remedies