this passage refers was as follows: Q. In fact, wouldn’t you agree with me, Doctor, that actions speak louder than words? A. Now, that’s a common saying, but I don’t think it’s always accurate. Q. You wouldn’t agree with that? A. Actions are important. The facts of what happens are critical, but that, in and of itself, does not define the state of mind. When viewed in context, this argument is not grossly improper. The essence of the prosecutor’s argument was that Dr. Corvin’s assessment of defendant’s mental state did not necessarily take into account all of defendant’s actions surrounding the murder. Moreover, the jury was instructed by the trial court “to rely solely upon your recollection of the evidence in your deliberations.” See Gregory, 340 N.C. at 408, 459 S.E.2d at 662-63 (<HOLDING>). Thus, even if the comments were improper, the
holding that a jury is presumed to follow a judges instructions holding that a jury is presumed to follow the trial courts instructions holding that jurors were presumed to follow instructions similar to those in the instant case holding that it is presumed that the jury obeyed the trial courts instructions recognizing that jurors are presumed to follow instructions