manage the process of joining multiple parties in a manner that is orderly, sensible, and not otherwise contrary to statutory commands or the provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed.Rule Civ.Proc. 83. It follows that, once an [FLSA] action is filed, the court has a managerial responsibility to oversee the joinder of additional parties to assure that the task is accomplished in an efficient and proper way. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. Sperling, 493 U.S. at 170-171, 110 S.Ct. at 486. Although a district court has discretion to authorize notice to similarly situated employees of the opportunity to opt-in to a class, the giving of such notice is not mandatory. Id., 493 U.S. at 169, 110 S.Ct. 482; see also Camper v. Home Quality Mgmt., Inc., 200 F.R.D. 516, 519 (D.Md.2000)(<HOLDING>); Hall v. Burk, 2002 WL 413901, *2
holding the selection of the person to be appointed guardian is a matter which is committed largely to the discretion of the appointing court and an appellate court will interfere with the exercise of this discretion only in case of a clear abuse holding that the faas action in this case was  analogous to an exercise of prosecutorial discretion  and noting that when prosecutorial discretion is at issue the matter is presumptively committed to agency discretion by law holding that in considering dismissal of an appeal the court should exercise discretion to determine whether dismissal is appropriate in the circumstances presented by the case holding failure to exercise discretion is abuse of discretion holding that the relevant inquiry is not whether the court has discretion to facilitate notice but whether this is an appropriate case in which to exercise discretion