corporation that is organized exclusively for religious purposes, nor does the City assert that the Archdiocese operates the subject properties in a for profit manner. There is no dispute with respect to the statute’s requirement limiting the amount of land (five acres) that may enjoy exemption with respect to a given improvement. Thus, the only issue for this court to resolve is whether the properties were actually and exclusively used for religious worship or religious purposes. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution generally provides for protections of religious freedom. U.S. Const, amend I. However, such protections are not absolute, and burdens, including tax burdens are permitted. See, e.g., United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. 252, 102 S.Ct. 1051, 71 L.Ed.2d 127 (1982) (<HOLDING>); South Ridge Baptist Church v. Indus. Comm’n
holding that the imposition of a life sentence on a juvenile does not violate the holding of roper holding that imposition of government fees did not violate exempt status of religious organization holding that imposition of social security taxes on persons who object to the receipt or payment of public insurance benefits on religious grounds does not violate the first amendment holding that offset for social security retirement benefits does not include federal disability benefits and stating that there was no legislative intent to embody the entire subchapter of the social security act dealing with both disability benefits and old age benefits holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation