to the requested costs of copying patent-related documents and grant the $457 requested. 3. Deposition Expenses E + H requests $2,128.91 for expenses incurred in transcribing deposition testimony and obtaining copies of deposition transcripts of Robert E. Kiser, Clarence Mason and Gordon Beazley. Hawk objects, arguing that neither the Kiser nor the Beazley deposition transcripts were introduced into evidence at trial, and for that reason they cannot be taxed as costs. The cases cited by Hawk in support of this objection do hold that costs for depositions not introduced at trial are “generally not recompensable under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920,” Wolfe v. Wolfe, 570 F.Supp. 826, 829 (D.S.C.1983); see also, Sperry Rand Corporation v. A-T-O, Inc., 58 F.R.D. 132, 138 (Va.1973) (<HOLDING>). However, Hawk fails to mention that “[t]he
holding that a cause of action for an unconstitutional taking accrues at the time the taking occurs holding that the expenses of depositions taken merely for discovery purposes should be borne by the party taking them holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence holding sanctions were appropriate where party filed motions merely for purposes of delay