a firearms examiner with the Arkansas State Crime Laboratory. Andrejack testified that neither the .22 caliber rifle nor the .22 caliber pistol found at the home fired the bullet found in Yogi’s body. While it is true that investigators were unable to locate the .22 caliber revolver that appellant used to shoot Yogi, the .22 caliber rifle formed no link in the chain of evidence necessary to support the State’s cover-up theory. See Grigsby v. State, supra. Accordingly, the circuit court erred in admitting the .22 caliber rifle. Even when a trial court errs in admitting evidence, we have held that when the evidence of guilt is overwhelming and the error is slight, we can declare that the error was harmless and affirm the conviction. See Cobb v. State, 340 Ark. 240, 12 S.W.3d 395 (2000) (<HOLDING>). To determine if the error is slight, we can
holding that a hearsay error was harmless where the essential elements of the testimony were elsewhere properly admitted in evidence holding although admission of victim impact testimony was error it was harmless in light of strong evidence against defendant holding any error in admitting allegedly irrelevant testimony that the defendant loved music was harmless in capital murder prosecution where the defendant admitted killing the victim and evidence supported the conviction holding in all cases that where the evidence of guilt was sufficient any error in the exclusion of lastminute evidence and testimony was harmless error holding that evidence the defendant knew the victim supported a finding that the murder was committed to avoid arrest