weight. In light of the foregoing, the Court determines that the “relative means of the parties” factor is neutral in this case. C. Summary In sum, although the Court recognizes that the plaintiffs choice of forum should not be disturbed unless the other factors weigh strongly in favor of transfer, the Court finds that defendant has met its burden in this case. Despite the fact that plaintiffs attorney may need to travel to New Jersey, the other factors — particularly that the locus of operative facts occurred entirely in New Jersey and that the only connection plaintiff has with this District is that his counsel resides here— overwhelmingly support transfer. See, e.g., Scott v. Life Investors Ins. Co. of Am., No. 2:07 CV 29, 2007 WL 3390012, at *3, *6 (N.D. W. Va. Nov. 13, 2007) (<HOLDING>); Black v. JCPenny Life Ins. Co., No. C 01-4070
holding that plaintiffs failure to prove decedents death was caused by the wrongful acts of the defendant precludes any recovery of wrongful death damages under mississippis wrongful death statute holding in case where plaintiff sought damages resulting from the defendants failure to pay the accidental death benefit claims she filed following death of her husband transfer to south carolina was warranted because with the exception of plaintiffs relocation to the state of west virginia following the death of the decedent the cause of action bears virtually no relation to the forum chosen by the plaintiff recognizing cause of action for wrongful death holding that personal representative may amend personal injury suit to state wrongful death claim following plaintiffs death holding that intent to cause death could be inferred from the nature and extent of the wounds and the fact that the defendant left decedent to bleed to death while he went home to bed