to violate Section 1341. 2 . Lane’s convictions under Counts 12, 34 and 35 were based on services he was charged with performing as a “banker”. His Count 17 conviction was based on a fraudulent claim for theft of personal property from his home. By oversight Count 24 was not listed on the verdict form and there was no verdict on that count. 3 . These included motions for extensions of time within which to move to dismiss the indictment, motion for inspection of grand jury minutes and for inspection of the transcript of grand jury proceedings, to dismiss the indictment, both on the merits and because of delay in trial, motions for bills of particulars and motions against prejudicial joinder. 4 . United Sta 48, at page 852, cert. denied 1962, 369 U.S. 803, 82 S.Ct. 641, 7 L.Ed.2d 550 (<HOLDING>); Sawyer v. Barczak, 7 Cir., 1956, 229 F.2d
holding that delay caused by or consented to by a defendant is not unreasonable holding that a five month delay was unreasonable holding that a five month delay is unreasonable holding that a 13 month delay was unreasonable holding that a six month delay was unreasonable