be considered “if the alien demonstrates to the satisfaction of the Attorney General either the existence of changed circumstances which materially affect the applicant’s eligibility for asylum or extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay in filing an application within the period specified ....” § 1158(a)(2)(D). Section 1158(a)(3) provides: “[n]o court shall have jurisdiction to review any determination of the Attorney General under paragraph (2).” § 1158(a)(3). Under our current precedent, § 1158(a)(3) divests us of jurisdiction to review the determination that an asylum applicant filed an untimely application or failed to establish changed or extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely filing. Fahim v. U.S. Att’y Gen., 278 F.3d 1216, 1217 (11th Cir.2002) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); Ruiz v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 762, 765 (11th
holding that section 1158a3 divests our court of jurisdiction to review a decision regarding whether an alien complied with the oneyear time limit or established extraordinary circumstances that would excuse his untimely filing holding that attorney generals authority to deport creates no private right of action for a criminal alien because attorney general must act in best interest of united states not the criminal alien holding that  1158a3 divests the court of jurisdiction to review decisions of whether an alien complied with the oneyear time limit or whether extraordinary circumstances were present to justify untimely filing of the asylum application citing mendoza v us atty gen 327 f3d 1283 1287 11th cir2003 holding attorney general could not contract on behalf of the state to employ an assistant attorney beyond the attorney generals own term holding that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the attorney generals decision as to timeliness of an asylum request pursuant to 8 usc  1158a3 the attorney generals decision regarding whether an alien complied with the oneyear time limit or established extraordinary circumstances such that the time limit should be waived is not reviewable by any court