attorney’s fees (R. at 106), ond brief (bearing "15” as a handwritten page number) begins mid-sentence, even though the previous page (bearing “14” as a handwritten page number) concluded with the end of its last paragraph. Given this, it appears that Jones may have omitted one or more pages from his brief when he filed it. Jones has not taken any action to correct his brief or otherwise inform the Court of a problem with this filing. 8 . By not challenging the bankruptcy court’s decision to construe the Application as seek-tag to be appointed as special counsel on behalf of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate, and by not addressing § 327(e) in his briefs, Jones has waived any argument on these issues. Landstrom v. Ill. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 892 F.2d 670, 678 (7th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). 9 . Because Land was a Chapter 11 bankruptcy,
holding that a single sentence in an opening brief asserting a district courts alleged error is insufficient to raise on appeal any meritsbased challenge to the district courts ruling holding that a courts failure to provide a defendant with any portion of a habeas transcript was error holding that appellants waived any claim of error as to the portion of the lower courts ruling that they did not expressly challenge on appeal holding that the defendant waived the right to challenge a suppression ruling on appeal holding challenge to suppression ruling not waived under young even though record did not affirmatively indicate that the ruling was part or all of reason for plea