questions and proceedings and may enter judgment or order thereon in the court in which the case is pending without having the case transferred to the court of the judge acting.... Any judgment rendered or action taken by any judge in any of said courts in the county shall be valid and binding.” Tex.R. Civ. P. 330(h). Although the Texas Family Code contains a unique provision giving a court continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over matters involving the welfare of a child upon the rendition of a final order in an original suit affecting a parent-child relationship, see Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 155.001 (Vernon 2008), this does not preclude the application of the exchange-of-benches doctrine in such cases. See In re Garza, 981 S.W.2d 438, 441 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). It is undisputed that the 313th Judicial
holding the circuit court has exclusive jurisdiction over condemnation proceedings holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility holding that the district court did not have jurisdiction and remanding the matter to state court holding that the district court has broad authority to take jurisdiction over a matter even when that matter is not brought by a real party in interest holding that when district court has continuing and exclusive jurisdiction over sapcr matter judge of another district court in same county may rule in matter so long as record is clear that judge is acting on behalf of court with continuing and exclusive jurisdiction