bond given to obtain the discharge of the lien, interest on any money deposited for the purpose of discharging the lien,- and punitive damages in ■an amount not exceeding the difference between the amount claimed by the lienor to be due or to become due and the amount actually due or to become due. 5 . Moreover, Hollub involved a determination of prevailing party status to be made in the first instance by the trial court. In the present case, the parties agreed that such a determination would be made by the arbitrator, thereby severely restricting — if not altogether eliminating — the parties' ability to seek, and the trial court’s authority to grant, a modification of the arbitrator’s determination. See § 682.14(1), Fla. Stat. See also Cassara v. Wofford, 55 So.2d 102, 105 (Fla.1951) (<HOLDING>) 6 . Prosperi v. Code, Inc., 626 So.2d 1360
holding that errors of law without accompanying fraud or misconduct not enough to set aside arbitration award holding that manifest disregard of the law is one of the very unusual circumstances in which a federal court can set aside an arbitration award holding that an award of arbitration cannot be set aside for mere errors of judgment either as to the law or the facts if the award is within the scope of the submission and the arbitrators are not guilty  of the acts of misconduct set forth in the statute the award operates as a final and conclusive judgment and  however disappointing it may be  the parties must abide by it holding that the role of the courts is limited to ascertaining whether there exists one of the specific grounds for the vacation of an award as provided in  10 of the arbitration act and that the court should not review the arbitration proceeding for errors of law or fact holding that an attorneys fees award is not appealable until the amount of the award is set