for Burke’s overreaching. Of course the bankruptcy judge did state that the fee only covered professional services and he did apply a fifteen percent reduction factor. Unfortunately, the record does not provide any solid support for that figure and does not reveal whether the proscription found in Bankruptcy Rule 219(c)(3) has been violated. When the attorney for the operating receiver has clearly claimed compensation for time spent performing professional and non-professional services the bankruptcy court is required to cull the non-professional time to insure that the attorney is compensated only for professional services. The bankruptcy judge can, in turn, place this burden on the attorney claiming the fee. Cf. In Re Orbit Liquor Store, 439 F.2d 1351, 1354 (5th Cir. 1971) (<HOLDING>). In the instant case Burke admitted that he
holding there is no constitutional right to an attorney much less an effective attorney in state postconviction proceedings holding attorney lacked standing to challenge amount of attorney fees awarded plaintiffs not parties to the appeal holding attorney general could not contract on behalf of the state to employ an assistant attorney beyond the attorney generals own term holding that an order imposing sanctions against an attorney for one of the parties in a pending case is final and therefore immediately appealable by the attorney holding that where an attorney serves as trustee and attorney for the trustee in a bankruptcy proceeding the attorney must distinguish time spent in each role