of the Mother’s parental rights under section 39.806(l)(f). The trial court additionally found that it was in the Children’s manifest best interest to terminate the Mother’s parental rights. § 39.810, Fla. Stat. (2015). The Mother’s appeal followed. IV. ISSUE AND ANALYSIS .The issue we must decide is whether the record contains competent substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding that the Department established by clear and convincing evidence that the Mother . (1) engaged in egregious conduct, or (2) had the opportunity and capability to prevent and knowingly failed to prevent egregious conduct that threatens the life, safety, or physical, mental,.or emotional health of the Children. See R.P. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 975 So.2d 435, 436 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (<HOLDING>); T.V. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs.,
holding that due process allows parental rights to be terminated only upon clear and convincing evidence of unfitness holding that a trial courts findings of fact based on evidence that was essentially documentary in nature will not be overturned if there is reasonable and logical support for them in the record holding that the clear and convincing standard provides appropriate due process in cases involving parental rights holding that a trial courts determination that clear and convincing evidence supports the termination of parental rights will not be overturned unless found to be clearly erroneous or lacking in evidentiary support recognizing that the department is required to present clear and convincing evidence to support termination of a parents parental rights