putting air into his tire at a gas station. The motorist pulled into the gas station and parked his truck in a manner that blocked the insured’s vehicle. The motorist then began yelling and threatening the insured, attempting to pick a fight. The motorist moved his truck so that it was no longer blocking the insured’s vehicle, and parked it parallel to the insured’s vehicle. The motorist then pointed a gun at the insured. An exchange of gunfire ensued culminating in the motorist shooting the insured while the insured was attempting to escape in his vehicle. Ulrich, 839 P.2d at 944-45. ¶51 In holding that the insured’s injuries did not arise out of the use of the motorist’s truck, the Wyoming Supreme Court applied the “natural consequences” test to U . 1995), 878 F.Supp. 862, 864-65 (<HOLDING>). ¶53 In advocating their respective tests,
holding that injuries must be connected to the use of the car as a car ie as a means of transportation rather than a situs for the commission of criminal acts holding that the defendant failed to demonstrate legitimate expectation of privacy where he could not show that he had the owners permission to use the car or demonstrate prior use or control of the car holding that there was probable cause for arrest where officers knew defendants had recently been with suspected drug dealer officers saw defendants car being maneuvered so as to indicate that surveillance had been detected and when officers approached car defendant attempted to place package under car and then pulled the package back inside the car and closed and locked the car door holding that the driver of a car who had permission to use the car had standing to challenge its search holding that an officer intentionally hitting the plaintiffs head into the top of the police car as the plaintiff was being placed in the police car could be excessive force