meeting of creditors held under § 341(a) is concluded or within 30 days after any amendment to the list or supplemental schedules is filed, whichever is later.” If an objection is not filed in time, an interested party “cannot contest the exemption ... whether or not [the debtor] had a colorable statutory basis for claiming it.” Taylor v. Freeland & Kronz, 503 U.S. 638, 644, 112 S.Ct. 1644, 118 L.Ed.2d 280 (1992); see also Schwab, 560 U.S. at 775-76, 130 S.Ct. 2652 (“If an interested party fails to object within the time allowed, a claimed exemption will exclude the subject property from the estate even if the exemption’s value exceeds what the Code permits.”); In re Soares, 471 B.R. 20, 27 (Bankr.D.Ma WL 3808133, at *6, 2013 Bankr.LEXIS 2979, at *23-25 (Bankr.N.D.W.Va. July 21, 2013) (<HOLDING>). But cf. In re Dougan, 484 B.R. 529, 531
holding act qualifies as exemption statute under exemption 3 holding that debtors cannot claim an exemption in a homestead after trustee avoided the transfer of the property as a fraudulent conveyance because the transfer by the debtors was voluntary holding that a debtors technically incorrect exemption in a wrongful death claim based on west virginias homestead exemption stands as claimed because the trustee did not object to the exemption in time holding one who claims tax exemption has burden of showing entitlement to exemption holding a debtors claim for loss of consortium to be entitled to an exemption under the oklahoma exemption statute and collecting other bankruptcy decisions recognizing a debtor spouses loss of consortium as the basis for allowing an exemption under federal and various state exemption statutes