police testified that Diana Buchanan made statements indicating that she knew how to use these weapons, and that she had contemplated firing them at police. Police testimony also indicated that Diana Buchanan had used firearms in the past, and reasonably knew that her co-conspirators were carrying weapons in Austin. Judging from the record, the district court’s § 2Dl.l(b)(l) two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm was not clearly erroneous. In sentencing, “a district court has wide discretion in determining which evidence to consider and which testimony to credit.” Edwards, 65 F.3d at 432. Accordingly, we hold that the record in this case provides ample evidence to support a § 2Dl.l(b)(l) enhancement of Diana Buchanan’s offense level. See, e.g., Rodriguez, 62 F.3d at 724-25 (<HOLDING>). Ill A John Buchanan argues that the district
holding that an unloaded gun was a dangerous weapon within the meaning of the federal bank robbery statute partly due to potential harm when used as a bludgeon holding that possession of a weapon is not in an of itself a crime holding that an unloaded gun used in the commission of an aggravated assault is a deadly weapon holding that so long as weapon was accessible to defendant fact that it was never brandished and was unloaded does not negate a finding of possession under  2dllbl holding that a defendant possessed a dangerous weapon for purposes of ussg  2dllbl when law enforcement discovered a shotgun in the defendants home after the completion of the crimes