Trustee,” states “a proceeding to contest any act or failure to act by the United States trustee is [a contested matter] governed by Rule 9014.” Implicit in these rules is the conclusion that all acts of the U.S. Trustee are subject to review by the Court. See In re Barney’s, Inc., 197 B.R. 431, 437-38 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1996)(noting that the Advisory Committee Notes to the Bankruptcy Rules further support this inherent power of review). In the opinion of this Court, 11 U.S.C. Sec. 1102 does not restrict or limit this authority in any way. Numerous decisions have held that the court may modify or alter the composition of a committee when it does not adequately represent the parties-in-interest and that the court is not limited to ordering appointme .R. 209, 210-211 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1990)(<HOLDING>); In re Hills Stores Co., 137 B.R. 4, 8
holding that when a representation was that the insured had what coverage it needed  such a statement does not rise to the level of specificity required to be a representation of liquor liability coverage recognizing that a defendant may not insist on representation by an attorney he cannot afford recognizing that the constitutions guarantee of assistance of counsel cannot be satisfied by mere formal appointment of an attorney holding that representation issues are matters relegated to the board representation issues may not be decided by contract and thus may not be decided by an arbitrator holding that inadequate representation may only be remedied by appointment of another committee