(<HOLDING>); Ex parte Lesher, 651 S.W.2d 734, 735-36
holding injunction was proper after state court entered a temporary restraining order against defendants many of whom were also defendants in a federal multidistrict action because the restraining order would interfere with the multidistrict courts ability to dispose of the action before it holding temporary restraining order void for lack of requirement of separate bond holding that the failure of the applicant to file a bond before the issuance of the temporary injunction renders the injunction void ab initio holding that violations of a courts temporary restraining order can be redressed as an unlawful act claim under the ucl holding that failure to include right to appeal in statute indicated legislature did not intend to permit appeal from denial of temporary restraining order