v. Jones, 117 Fla. 622, 158 So. 170 (1934) (“An act which is required to be accomplished by ordinance may not be accomplished by resolution.”)). It is clear that the action by the Town is an ordinance as defined under section 166.041(1)(a). In R14-05, the Town regulates the use of property in a manner that is both general and permanent. Further, it is neither a matter of administration for the Town nor an expression of a temporary character. Because the Town enacted R14-05 without following the requirements of section 166.041(3)(a) (notice in newspaper at least 10 days prior to adoption), the ordinance is void. Ellison v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 183 So.2d 193 (Fla.1966); Healthsouth Doctors’ Hosp. v. Hartnett, 622 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); see also Carlton v. Jones, 158 So. at 171 (<HOLDING>); Webb v. Town Council of Town of Hilliard, 766
holding that directive not promulgated according to apa procedure lacks force and effect of law recognizing that a state courts determination is not an unreasonable application of law merely because it is erroneous recognizing a district courts discretion to dismiss a counterclaim alleging that a patent is invalid where it finds no infringement recognizing that when an ordinance is not published according to law it is invalid and of no effect holding that it is not