revoked the defendant’s, suspended sentence. Gilbert, 765 P.2d at 1209-10. The Vermont Supreme Court also affirmed a conviction for violating an abuse prevention order against the defendant’s First Amendment challenge to the underlying order when he had threatened violence and had violated a previous protection order. State v. Mott, 166 Vt. 188, 692 A.2d 360, 362, 365 (1997). [¶22] To disallow the imposition of an order 'restraining contact when abuse and harassment have already occurred, and a person has a demonstrable need for protection from further abusive and harassing conduct, “would establish a precedent that would leave persons powerless to protect themselves against unwanted, annoying, or harassing intrusions on their privacy.” People in Interest of C.S.M., 570 P.2d at 230-31 (<HOLDING>). The First Amendment does not support such a
holding that a twoyear suspension of visitation privileges did not violate either the first amendments right to freedom of association holding that resigntorun provision of maine judicial code of conduct does not violate the guarantees of equal protection freedom of speech or freedom of association in either the maine or united states constitutions recognizing even federal constitutional right of association does not apply to the right of one individual to associate with another holding federal restrictions of firearms rights not triggered by general nocontact order holding that a nocontact order did not violate the right to freedom of association