Daniel Manriquez, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against prison officials. He contends that the district court erred in dismissing seven claims regarding his continued confinement in a “Security Housing Unit” and in concluding that his Eighth Amendment claim was barred by the statute of limitations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. We s finished exhausting administrative remedies, in May 2003. See Brown v. Valoff, 422 F.3d 926, 943 (9th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Manriquez is not entitled to additional,
holding that the limitations period is not tolled while a federal habeas petition is pending holding that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional holding that statute of limitations is tolled while prisoner completes mandatory exhaustion process recognizing that exhaustion is mandatory and jurisdictional holding that the statute is mandatory