at 516-23, 127 S.Ct. 1438. The court concludes that West Virginia has failed to do so here. Its claimed injury of “political accountability” is not an “invasion of a legal ly protected interest” that is “concrete and particularized” and “not conjectural or hypothetical.” Lujan, 504 U.S. at 560, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted). For starters, the State’s interest in avoiding greater political accountability relative to the, federal government is not the kind of sovereign state intere app, 458 U.S. at 601, 102 S.Ct. 3260 (observing that “a State is bound to have a variety of proprietary interests ... [such as] ownfing] land or participating] in a business venture”). It also does not involve resolution of public nuisances, id. at 603, 102 S.Ct. 3260 (<HOLDING>); preservation of its citizens’ economic or
recognizing strong interest in protecting texas citizens where tort was committed in whole or in part in texas recognizing minnesotas interest in protecting the interests of the child holding constitutional a tax on a private citizens interest in housing on government property received as part of the private citizens compensation recognizing a states interest in representing the interests of their citizens in enjoining public nuisances recognizing the public interest exception