turn to the issue of the $7,500 bond. 1. Bias, Conspiracy, and Fraud Claims. On the bias, conspiracy, and fraud issues, Appellant argues that he will not have an adequate remedy by appeal and that he will suffer irreparable injury because of the time it takes for the appeals to be decided and the effect of the delay on his relationship with his children. He believes that he and his children are injured because his visitation with them is more limited than it should be, and this error cannot be corrected until the Court of Appeals considers the appeals, which could take many months. This Court has repeatedly held that the delay and expense of appeals does not constitute irreparable injury or render remedy by appeal inadequate. See, e.g., Buckley v. Wilson, 177 S.W.3d 778, 781 (Ky.2005) (<HOLDING>); Ison v. Bradley, 338 S.W.2d 784, 786
holding that identification of appellant in notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement and that the failure to name a party in a notice to appeal constitutes a failure of that party to appeal holding that the appellant had an adequate remedy by appeal for his discovery violation allegations holding that there was no right to appeal an order denying a motion for correction of judgment which was filed after delays for applying for new trial and appeal expired holding that the delays inherent in every lawsuit and appeal do not constitute inadequate remedy by appeal holding that an issue not raised on direct appeal of sentence is barred by the law of the case from presentation in a subsequent appeal