Third• New International Dictionary 1392 (unabr. ed.1993) (defining “material” as “being of real importance or great consequence: substantial”). We think a departure from statutory requirements is of real importance or of great consequence only when the defendant’s rights have been prejudiced. See Langdon, 126 Cal.Rptr. at 579 (requiring a showing of prejudice resulting from improper jury-selection procedures in order to obtain reversal of criminal conviction); Coble, 301 N.W.2d at 236 (stating that in assessing jury challenges, “irregularities in the process are immaterial unless it appears probable that there has been prejudice”). Common sense dictates that any prejudice must relate to the interests which the statutory requirement seeks to protect. See Martel, 689 A.2d at 1329-30 (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we now turn to (1) an examination
holding that the term shall is mandatory for purposes of statutory construction when the statute is unambiguous holding neither a lack of prejudice to the defendant nor the running of the statute of limitations constitutes good cause holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause holding statutory noncompliance generally rises to a substantial level and prejudice to the defendant occurs when the purposes of the statute  are contravened holding that any reduction in sentence constitutes substantial prejudice for purposes of strickland analysis