the investigation and trial, IIED claim accrued at the same time as malicious prosecution claim); Walden, 755 F.Supp.2d at 962 (finding IIED claim accrued at the same time as malicious prosecution claim where plaintiff alleged inter alia that defendant officers tortured a false confession from plaintiff, fabricated, coerced and suppressed evidence and continued his false imprisonment after procuring his wrongful conviction); see also Parish v. City of Elkhart, 614 F.3d 677, 684 (7th Cir.2010) (applying Indiana law, concluding that IIED claim did not accrue until criminal conviction was favorably disposed where the “heart” of plaintiffs complaint was “that the defendant officers fabricated an entire case against him that led to his wrongful conviction”); but see Brooks, 578 F.3d at 579 (<HOLDING>); Evans v. City of Chicago, 434 F.3d 916, 935
holding that for a legal malpractice claim to accrue a plaintiff need not know the precise extent of his or her damages or even have suffered all of the damages attributable to his or her attorneys negligence holding that iied claim accrued at the time of plaintiffs indictment not upon the dismissal of his criminal case even if the damages that plaintiff suffered  continued throughout his trial holding that the right of action accrued upon failure to perform contract holding that the payments accrued holding that under the rule against splitting a cause of action a new claim for damages is not barred if the underlying cause of action had not accrued at the time of filing the previous lawsuit