any source whatsoever during their marriage, shall be their respective separate property, except if unless specifically otherwise designated at the time of acquisition thereof, or other individual separate agreement of the parties. Nevertheless, Mary Hamilton argues that we should modify the trial court’s findings to indicate that she is entitled to a life estate in the furnishings of the marital home, other than the four bronzes. However, because we lack the advantage of seeing and hearing witnesses testify, we are not in a position to make our own findings of fact. Gillmor v. Gillmor, 745 P.2d 461, 462 (Utah App.1987), cert. denied, 765 P.2d 1278 (Utah 1988). Moreover, to do so would be to invade the province of the trial court. See Rucker v. Dalton, 598 P.2d 1336, 1338 (Utah 1979) (<HOLDING>). • Accordingly, we hold that the trial court’s
recognizing appellate courts must not make fact findings holding remand proper on circuit courts own motion in a workers compensation case where the commission failed to make essential findings of fact because to hold otherwise would in such cases make the determination of the rights of the parties turn upon the neglect of the commission to make essential findings of fact or require the appellate court to make the omitted findings of fact which our statute forbids holding that it is not an appellate courts function to make findings of fact holding section 768201 is exception to general rule that appellate courts uphold  the trial court even if it failed to make findings on the record whenever it would be reasonable to assume that the court actually made such findings holding failure to make explicit findings of fact and conclusions of law did not preclude meaningful appellate review