warrantless search violates the fourth amendment unless it falls within one of the recognized exceptions to the warrant requirement.") Suppression of the illegally obtained evidence was the sufficient and required remedy for the unconstitutional police search and seizure. Additional sanctions might be appropriate in an instance of governmental loss or destruction of exculpatory and material evidence, discovery violation, or other egregious governmental misconduct. See People v. Braunthal, 31 P.3d 167, 172-73 (Colo.2001). However, an illegal seizure of previous identification samples from the defendant by the police does not foreclose the prosecution from obtaining identity evidence through proper means after filing of the case. See People v. Madsen, 743 P.2d 437, 439 (Colo.App.1987)(<HOLDING>). Crim. P. 41.1 and Crim. P. 16(II)(a) do not
holding that the right to a set off in bankruptcy is discretionary and reviewing the denial of a set off for clear abuse holding that the trial court was without authority to set aside entry of default on motion to set aside default judgment holding that second set of defendants palm prints were not tainted by prosecutions violation of crim p 16ida in obtaining the first set of defendants palm prints recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict holding that when a defendants sentence has been set aside on appeal a trial court at resentencing may consider evidence of the defendants postsentencing rehabilitation