resistance, temperature, barorqetric pressure, engine age, associated cylinder compres sion ratio, ambient air conditions, and the like. ’258 Patent 11:6-25. Column 11 is simply a list of input factors with no disclosure on the relationship of any of these factors to glow plug energization. Merely stating that the inputs could be “interactively adapted” fails to inform how any of these inputs relate to one another. Although the listed variables may affect temperature and voltage variables depicted in Chart 1 and Figure 2, the listed variables Plaintiffs cite in Column 11 are not themselves algorithms. The Federal Circuit, has rejected the notion that a list of variables alone without a disclosed relationship could constitute a disclosed algorithm. See Ibor-meith, 732 F.3d at 1381 (<HOLDING>). Although Plaintiffs note that the description
recognizing same factors recognizing that among other factors the location and level of the precedent as well as its age are important factors in a qualified immunity analysis holding that judgment calls on the weight to be given various relevant factors are for the sentencing court not for this court holding that a list of identified factors related to detecting driver drowsiness in a sleep monitoring program does not amount to an algorithm when there is no disclosure of even a single concrete relationship between the various factors that are used to compute an outcome to warn of driver drowsiness holding that the district court is not required to state on the record that it has explicitly considered each of the  3553a factors or to discuss each of the  3553a factors