the purchaser assume that responsibility. ECRA further provides that the DEP or transferees can void the sale if the trans-feror fails to comply with any provision of the Act, and that penalties of up to $25,000 per day may be imposed on those who fail to comply. The Act also provides that obligations imposed by the Act are intended to “constitute continuing regulatory obligations imposed by the state” and are not to be considered as liens or claims dis-chargeable in bankruptcy. In re Borne Chemical Co., 54 B.R. at 128. Obviously, the interests could not be satisfied with a money judgment. See Torwico Elecs., Inc., v. New Jersey Dep’t of Envtl. Protection (In re Torwico Elecs., Inc.), 8 F.3d 146, 150-51 (3d Cir.1993), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1576, 128 L.Ed.2d 219 (1994) (<HOLDING>). In the case at issue, DMAS can be compelled
recognizing inherent power of bankruptcy courts to equitably surcharge a debtors exemption to protect integrity of the bankruptcy process and to ensure that debtor does not exempt amount greater than allowed under bankruptcy code holding that the bankruptcy code endows the bankruptcy trustee with the exclusive right to sue on behalf of the estate holding debtors obligation to clean up hazardous waste on property was not claim under bankruptcy code state didnt have right to payment but instead had right to force debtor to comply with existing environmental laws holding that bankruptcy court is without jurisdiction to control disposition of chapter 13 debtors property that is not property of the bankruptcy estate unless the property is related to the bankruptcy proceedings of the code holding that the bankruptcy code should not be understood to force bankruptcy courts to use statelaw procedures and statelaw actors to determine what portion of a debtors real property is an exempt homestead