creditor's proof of claim.”). Cf. In re Quigley Co., Inc., 676 F.3d 45, 52 (2d Cir.2012) (noting that the holding of Stern was narrow, and that "[ejnjoining litigation to protect bankruptcy estates during the pendency of bankruptcy proceedings, unlike the entry of the final tort judgment at issue in Stern, has historically been the province of the bankruptcy courts.”) (citation omitted). 92 . See In re Prudential Lines, Inc., 170 B.R. 222, 243 (S.D.N.Y.1994). Cf. Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58, 103 S.Ct. 400, 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982) ("The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control ove 16 U.S. 367, 385, 116 S.Ct. 873, 134 L.Ed.2d 6 (1996) (<HOLDING>); Migra v. Warren City School Dist. Bd. of
holding that for federal court to grant full faith and credit to state court judgment state proceedings must satisfy the minimum procedural requirements of the fourteenth amendments due process clause holding that a state court settlement may be given full faith and credit in federal courts even if it concerns an exclusively federal area of law holding that constitutional error was waived even though petitioner repeatedly used the phrase full faith and credit because petitioner did not cite to the federal constitution or to any cases relying on the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution holding that a federal court must enforce a state court judgment under the full faith and credit statute where diversity jurisdiction exists recognizing the uncertain state of federal law in this area