plainly erred by imposing a condition of supervised release that required him to report to his probation officer within 72 hours of re-entering the United States because such a condition violates his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. This contention is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 441 F.3d 767, 772-73 (9th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. ** This disposition is not
holding that a condition of supervised release that requires a defendant to report to his probation officer upon reentry to the united states does not violate the defendants fifth amendment right against selfincrimination holding that imposing supervised release condition that defendant report to his probation officer upon reentry into the united states is not plain error holding that the fifth amendments protection against selfincrimination is applicable to the states through the fourteenth amendment holding that term of supervised release was not automatically terminated when defendant was deported from united states and thus defendants subsequent commission of another offense illegal reentry after deportation prior to expiration of term of supervised release violated condition of supervised release that defendant commit no new offenses holding that defendants exercise of right to testify in own behalf waives his fifth amendment privilege against selfincrimination