court’s equity jurisdiction in the case sub judice is necessarily superimposed on P.S. § 3-105. When the circuit court finds that an officer is denied a right under the LEOBR pursuant to a show cause order, the court’s authority includes those equitable powers necessary to grant or vindicate the right denied. It is inconsistent with the concept of equity jurisdiction to limit the circuit court’s authority in ruling on a show cause order such that the relief awarded will not make the officer whole. Consequently, we hold that the circuit court, upon invocation of its equity jurisdiction, may grant such equitable remedies as are necessary to provide full relief to the officer as a result of the procedural violation. See Beard v. S/E Joint Venture, 321 Md. 126, 143, 581 A.2d 1275 (1990) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Williams, 305 Md. 1, 8, 501 A.2d
holding  he who seeks equity must do equity  holding that a grant of equitable relief requires diligence by the claimant recognizing the equitable maxim that once equity has jurisdiction it will grant complete relief holding that under the doctrine of equitable subrogation equity will grant relief where a mortgage is satisfied by mistake and no rights of third parties have intervened if the mistaken action was reasonable holding that the court may presume it has jurisdiction over a case once the plaintiffs initial burden of establishing jurisdiction has been satisfied