Constitution to hold that the textbook loan program unconstitutionally furnished aid to private sectarian schools. Gaffney, 220 N.W.2d at 557. The Nebraska Supreme Court concluded that the fact that the loan of textbooks was to the parents and students was not determinative because the program “lends strength and support to the school and, although indirectly, lends strength and support to the sponsoring sectarian institution.” Id. {35} The Supreme Courts of Oregon, Massachusetts, and Missouri interpreted similar Blaine-like state constitutional provisions and determined that even indirect aid to the sectarian, denominational, or private schools violates the constitutional provision. See Dickman v. Sch. Dist. No. 62C, Or. City, of Clackamas Cty., 366 P.2d 533, 543 (Or. 1961) (en banc) (<HOLDING>); see also Bloom v. Sch. Comm. of Springfield,
holding that a school district owed the highest degree of care to a student on a school bus such that the district could be liable for the sexual abuse of the student by the school bus driver holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials holding that the regulation prohibits the provision of an interpreter to a student in a sectarian school holding that the aid is extended to the pupil only as a member of the school the pupil attends and although the pupil may share in the indirect benefit such aid is an asset to the sectarian or private school holding that a students private school tuition should be reimbursed where parent did not unilaterally place student in private school because the school district tacitly consented to the private school attendance before proposing a different placement