States, 22 Cl.Ct. 178, 179 n.2 (1990), aff'd, 937 F.2d 623 (Fed.Cir.1991) (unpublished table decision). Third, the Court of Federal Claims lacks jurisdiction to entertain criminal matters, such as claims arising under the federal criminal code or claims regarding the conduct of criminal proceedings. See Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 379-80 (Fed.Cir.1994) (affirming that the Court of Federal Claims had “‘no jurisdiction to adjudicate any. claims whatsoever under the federal criminal code’”); Kania v. United States, 650 F.2d 264, 268 (Ct.Cl.1981) (noting that “the role of the judiciary in the high function of enforcing and policing the criminal law is assigned to the courts of general jurisdiction and not to this court”); Schweitzer v. United States, 82 Fed.Cl. 592, 596 (2008) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, plaintiff cannot collaterally
holding that the united states court of federal claims lacks jurisdiction over claims sounding in tort including fraud holding that the court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction over claims arising from the violation of a criminal statute holding that the court of federal claims lacks jurisdiction over challenges to indictments arrests prosecutions convictions imprisonment or parole holding that the court of federal claims had pendant jurisdiction over a state law contract claim that was part of the same case as a claim over which the court of federal claims had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 usc  1498b holding that state law claims cannot pend from a federal one over which the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction