responsive materials within this period, he has provided good cause for the delay and his filings are deemed timely. After Blagman responded, defendants filed a pleading construed as a motion to amend their summary judgment motion to include the defense of qualified immunity. So construed, the motion will be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a). 6 . See Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210, 223, 110 S.Ct. 1028, 108 L.Ed.2d 178 (1990) (reasonableness standard applies whenever the needs of prison administration implicate constitutional rights); Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89-91, 10 erties Union, 492 U.S. 573, 579 & n. 3, 109 S.Ct. 3086, 106 L.Ed.2d 472 (1989) ("Cultural aspect of Christmas in this country exceeds the theological significance.”); Lynch, 465 U.S. at 680, 104 S.Ct. 1355 (<HOLDING>). See also Elewski v. City of Syracuse, 123
holding that establishment of christmas day as legal public holiday did not violate establishment clause holding that the display of a privately sponsored creche on the staircase of the courthouse violated the establishment clause because the display actually favored sectarian religious expression holding that the display of a creche as a part of a public christmas display depicts the historical origins of this traditional event long recognized as a national holiday holding that display of unattended menorah in city hall park quite close to seat of government violated establishment clause because its combination alongside a secular holiday display did not cause a viewer to see the exhibit as a whole or as a unitary symbol holding inter alia that the display of a creche at a country courthouse violated the establishment clause but noting that there is an obvious distinction between a creche display and references to god in the motto and the pledge