spouse in a meeting with Owens, the district court found that counsel for the sheriff's department subsequently made clear in two letters that not "having contact with each other” was not a condition for employment, and that the sole condition necessary for Coker and Golden to return to work was to cease cohabitation with a married woman not his wife. See Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 68 238, 242 (6th Cir. 1996) (police department investigation of an officer “because of claims that he had committed acts of sexual misconduct while on duty, an accusation which certainly related to whether [the officer] was conducting himself appropriately as a police officer,” was not unreasonable); Fugate v. Phoenix Civil Serv. Bd., 791 F.2d 736, 741 (9th Cir. 1986) (<HOLDING>); Seegmiller v. LaVerkin City, 528 F.3d 762,
holding that fire departments are analogous to police departments in this respect holding that the right of privacy does not extend to sexual behavior that is not purely private that compromises a police officers performance and that threatens to undermine a police departments internal morale and community reputation holding that the privacy interests of the employee police officers did not exceed the publics right to know holding the evidence supported the police officers failure to follow the directives in the montgomery county police departments field operations manual holding that police officers sued in their official capacity are not liable for a violation of a privacy interest where the police department did not have a policy of deliberately failing to train its officers with respect to the confidentiality of records