of a warrantless search of a garbage bag located next to the appellant’s garage adjacent to public alley because the bag was readily accessible to the public), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 845, 113 S.Ct. 135, 121 L.Ed.2d 89 (1992); United States v. Wilkinson, 926 F.2d 22, 27 (1st Cir.1991) (approving a War-rantless search of a garbage left for collection on the appellant’s lawn next to the curb based on its ready accessibility and without mentioning curti-lage) (Breyer, C.J.), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1211, 111 S.Ct. 2813, 115 L.Ed.2d 985 (1991), and overruled on other grounds, Bailey v. United States, 516 U.S. 137, 149-51, 116 S.Ct. 501, 508-09, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). But see United States v. Certain Real Property Located at 987 Fisher Road, 719 F.Supp. 1396, 1404, 1405-06 (E.D.Mich.1989) (<HOLDING>). 3 . When determining whether trash is readily
holding that defendant lacked reasonable expectation of privacy in garbage located outside curtilage of home holding that a warrantless search of garbage located within the curtilage of the defendants home violated his fourth amendment rights holding that police officers warrantless search of rented home with consent of landlord but not tenant violated tenants fourth amendment rights holding canine sniff of an unattended vehicle parked outside the curtilage of defendants home was not a search within the meaning of the fourth amendment holding that a warrantless search of a garage that was part of the same building as the defendants living quarters violated the fourth amendment