insure repayment.” Stein, supra, 218 B.R. at 288 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); O’Hearn, supra, 339 F.3d at 564. The Debtor’s employment record reveals a complete failure to pursue a career commensurate with his college education and a striking indifference toward maintaining steady employment. He has made no effort to find additional employment to supplement his current income. He works only on weekends and he has not requested additional hours from his present employer in the past year. Meanwhile, he has nothing to do throughout most of the week and even complains of boredom. It is not an undue hardship to require an able debtor to work a full time job. See Brightful v. Pennsylvania Higher Educ. Assistance Agency (In re Brightful), 267 F.3d 324, 329 (3rd Cir.2001) (<HOLDING>); Educ. Credit Mgmt. Corp. v. Mosko (In re
holding that a party waived the claims she failed to pursue in her merit brief holding that insurance obligation was primary to indemnity obligation recognizing that a divorce decree obligation to hold an exspouse harmless from a debt creates an obligation between the debtor and the exspouse separate from any obligation the debtor may owe to the creditor holding that the state has no obligation to fund abortions or other medical services holding that a debtor has an obligation to pursue other opportunities if unable to earn enough in his or her current job