no report of any property crime, personal crime, or any weapons. The officer agreed that there was “nothing in Dispatch ... to imply that this may be a dangerous situation.” Id. Here, as in Hughes, there was no disturbance call or suspicious activity reported. The similarities end there, however. Before being ordered to stop, Mr. Charles raced up a flight of stairs. He then ran into an officer, and attempted to break the officer’s hold, pulling him down several steps at the same time. It is also a relevant consideration, though not necessarily dispositive, that the officers, upon arrival, encountered Mr. Charles along with several others at the apartment building, late at night, and in' a high-crime area. See Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143, 147-48, 92 S.Ct. 1921, 32 L.Ed.2d 612 (1972) (<HOLDING>). Although Mr. Charles’s response to his
holding that ones presence in a high crime area late at night without more will not justify an investigatory stop holding that the fact that an investigatory stop took place in a high crime area is pertinent to a terry analysis holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop holding that the forceable stop at issue was an investigatory stop rather than an arrest holding that in a high crime area unprovoked headlong flight from police can form the basis for reasonable suspicion under terry