Cir.2004)). While it is clearly established that “a party seeking to raise a claim on appeal must plainly and prominently so indicate,” Access Now, 385 F.3d at 1330, and, similarly, that failing to raise an argument in response to a motion for summary judgment results in its abandonment, Fischer v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, 349 Fed.Appx. 372, 375 n. 2 (11th Cir.2009) (citing Transamerica Leasing, Inc. v. Inst. of London Underwriters, 267 F.3d 1303, 1308 n. 1 (11th Cir.2001)), the defendants have presented the court with no authority that dictates a similar result with regard to briefs filed in a g that the First Amendment did not guarantee a student's right to deliver a sexually explicit speech at an assembly); New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 342, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985) (<HOLDING>). The court notes that these cases involve
holding that where other evidence established probable cause to believe that the defendant possessed controlled substances investigating officers had probable cause to search the defendants purse for similar evidence holding that a search of a students purse that was not based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same holding that a search incident to a lawful arrest does not violate the fourth amendment holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment