for reasonable counsel fees. Trial Court Memorandum Order, 11/13/01, at 7. Thus, the trial court assessed its award of $152,179.90 by summing $59,918.48 for contractual claims, $80,261.42 for penalties and interest, and $12,000.00 for counsel fees. Id. 4 . For convenience, the first two paragraphs will be termed the "termination” and "cancellation” provisions, respectively, of the contract. The third paragraph, or the "suspension” provision, does not come into play. 5 . The covenant of good faith and the doctrine of necessary implication appear to have a related conceptual genesis. See, e.g., Murphy, 777 A.2d at 434 n. 11 (observing that the obligation of good faith "is akin to the contract doctrine of necessary implication”); Shetter v. Welzel, 242 Pa. 355, 89 A. 455, 457 (1913) (<HOLDING>); Zell v. Dunkle, 156 Pa. 353, 27 A. 38 (1893)
holding that while the creditor has the initial burden to produce some evidence of lack of good faith the ultimate burden is on the debtor to prove his good faith holding that a party is estopped from doing what would be inconsistent with good faith in the way of obstructing the enjoyment of that which he had granted holding that bad faith includes lack of good faith in investigating the facts of a complaint holding that the defendant did not establish good faith as a matter of law holding that good faith exception does not apply because it is inconsistent with text of article 3823