Supreme Court has not ruled on this issue, then this Court must make an Erie guess’ and 'determine as best it can’ what the Louisiana Supreme Court would decide.” (quoting Krieser v. Hobbs, 166 F.3d 736, 738 (5th Cir.1999))). 20 . Gibraltar Sav. v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., 905 F.2d 1203, 1205 (8th Cir.1990) (alteration in original) (quoting Diversified Mortg. Inv. v. U.S. Life Title Ins. Co. of N.Y., 544 F.2d 571, 574 n. 2 (2d Cir.1976)). 21 . Blackhawk Prod. Credit Ass’n v. Chi. Title Ins. Co., 144 Wis.2d 68, 423 N.W.2d 521, 525 (1988). 22 . Amzak Capital Mgmt. v. Stewart Title of La. (In re West Feliciana Acquisition, L.L.C.), 744 F.3d 352, 358 (5th Cir.2014). 23 . See id.; see also First Am. Bank v. First Am. Transp. Title Ins. Co., 585 F.3d 833, 838-39 (5th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>). 24 . First Am. Bank, 585 F.3d at 838. 25 .
holding that a similar exclusion denies coverage for property damage to the particular part of the real property that is the subject of the insureds work at the time of the damage if the damage arises out of those operations holding that a partys responsibility for damage from any cause included damage cause by the indemnitee holding that termite damage does not fall within the meaning of property damage in the policy because the alleged misrepresentations did not cause the damage the termites did holding that first american may not recover consequential damages including losses arising from the results of damage rather than from the damage itself quoting blacks law dictionary 964 8th ed2004 holding that damage to realty was not excluded from coverage if such damage resulted from subsidence caused by something other than soil condition despite homeowners experts description of the damage as settling