(6th Cir.2009) (“[Chambers ] requires us to modify our prior decisions suggesting that all manner of escape ... including failures to report, constitute crimes of violence. Chambers ... undermines the notion that a ‘walkaway1 conviction is a crime of violence.”). While Chambers did not speak directly to “walkaway” escapes, as the Sixth Circuit recognized in Ford, Chambers undermines our prior case law. In Chambers, the Court did not discuss whether escape from custody crimes are sometimes or always violent felonies under the ACCA, except to note that “failure to report would seem less likely to involve a risk of physical harm than the less passive, more aggressive behavior underlying an escape from custody.” Id. at 691; but see United States v. Delgado, 320 Fed.Appx. 286 (5th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>) (unpublished). As our Sixth Circuit colleagues
holding that walkaway from community treatment center conviction was a crime of violence consistent with chambers holding prior to chambers that a walkaway escape is categorically a violent felony holding that a conviction for a lascivious act with a child in violation of iowa code  7098 was a crime of violence holding walkaway escape under north dakota statute a crime of violence holding that theft from the person is not a crime of violence