are enforceable. See White v. Village of Homewood, 256 Ill. App.3d 354, 195 Ill.Dec. 152, 628 N.E.2d 616, 619 (1993). Thus, exculpatory clauses that are against public policy include those between (1) an employer and employee; (2) the public and those charged with a duty of public service; and (3) parties where there is a such a disparity of bargaining power that the agreement does not represent a free choice on the part of the plaintiff, such as a monopoly. Id. Courts will not interfere with contracts containing exculpatory clauses, unless there is a defect in the negotiation process such that a disparity in bargaining power denied one party a meaningful choice. See Reuben H. Donnelley Corp. v. Krasny Supply Co., 227 Ill.App.3d 414, 169 Ill.Dec. 521, 592 N.E.2d 8, 11-12 (1991) (<HOLDING>). A party seeking to void an exculpatory clause
holding that the trial court was without authority to set aside entry of default on motion to set aside default judgment recognizing default judgment must generally be set aside without further showing if defendant never received service of process holding that without a defect in the negotiation process contract will not be set aside merely because agreement results in bad bargain for one of contracting parties recognizing that a trial court can set aside verdict holding that family courts conclusions will not be set aside if supported by findings