v. Univ. of Evansville, 755 N.E.2d 589, 600 (Ind.2001) (finding appropriation when defendant used plaintiffs’ names in e-mail addresses and web sites and holding that defendant misappropriated plaintiffs’ names to his “advantage in that [the misappropriation] enabled him to pursue a personal vendetta”). The Court has previously found Purdy in contempt for using the domain name feliciaboyd.info. In this case, Purdy has published a web page at the domain name hindrocket.com, which bears the title “Official John Hinderaker Site.” According to the evidence before the Court, Hinderaker is well-known by his blog pseudonym, Hindrocket, and an associated rocket graphic. An internet user might search for the pseudonym in a search engine or 1, at *18-19 (Cal.Ct.App. Nov. 12, 2002) (unpublished) (<HOLDING>); Hirsch v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc., 90 Wis.2d
holding that requirement of disclosing names and addresses of campaign contributors cannot constitutionally be applied to the party holding that names and address of private individuals appearing in files within the ambit of exemption 7c  are exempt from disclosure holding that where the policy names only the directors or officers as insured the proceeds are not property of the estate holding that californias appropriation statute covered appropriation of pseudonyms because nicknames and pen names are names holding that records regarding complaints against state police officers which would be exempt from disclosure when unredacted where no longer exempt after the names of state police troopers the names of complainants and all identifying information were redacted