matter jurisdiction is granted, and plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to RCFC 12(b)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. No costs. 1 . All of the Federal Circuit cases discussed in this section are unpublished decisions. As such, they do not constitute binding precedent. See Hamilton v. Brown, 39 F.3d 1574, 1581 (Fed.Cir.1994); Fed. Cir. R. 32.1(d). Although pursuant to Fed. Cir. R. 32.1(c) unpublished decisions issued prior to January 1, 2007, may not be cited by parties to the Federal Circuit, they are listed infra notes 2 and 3 to give a chronological record of what has been issued. 2 . See also Humphrey v. United. States, 60 Fed.Appx. 292, 295 (Fed.Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Caudle v. United States, 36 F.3d 1116, 1994
holding that  1495 failed to provide court of federal claims with jurisdiction to hear claim for unjust conviction where requirements of  2513 have not been met holding the court lacked jurisdiction under  1495 and 2513 without a certificate of innocence from the district court holding that the court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction over claims arising from the violation of a criminal statute holding that court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction under  2513 when trial courts order dismissing plaintiffs indictment and vacating his sentence failed to satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of  2513 holding the court lacked jurisdiction over claim under  2513 without certificate from district court