317 N.J.Super. at 560, 722 A.2d 626 (quoting Clohesy, supra, 149 N.J. at 514, 694 A.2d 1017); see also Sanchez, supra, 817 N.J.Super. at 81, 817 A.2d 318. “Factors used to determine the scope of a duty include the risk of harm and practicality of preventing it, and where the relevant behavior is easy to correct and the consequential harm serious, it is fair to impose a duty.” Thorne, supra, 317 N.J.Super. at 560-61, 722 A.2d 626 (citing J.S., supra, 155 N.J. at 339-40, 714 A.2d 924). We acknowledge that delivery persons will track in snow or water when the weather conditions are “icy, snowy, [and] rainy.” We recognize as well that slips and falls may occur on even the smallest amount of water or other debris, see Nisivoccia v. Glass Gardens, Inc., 175 N.J. 559, 818 A.2d 314 (2003) (<HOLDING>), but when the accumulation of water
holding that defendant was not entitled to entrapment instruction when there was insufficient evidence to support such an instruction holding plaintiff who slipped on a grape that was among six grapes scattered within a threefoot diameter was entitled to a modeofoperation jury instruction holding that issue of inadequate jury instruction was waived because the instruction given was the one expressly requested by defense counsel holding that when no objection was made to jury instruction evidence to support finding based on instruction should be assessed in light of the instruction given holding that failure to request jury instruction about manner in which evidence was obtained was not error and thus did not constitute ineffective assistance because defendant was not entitled to instruction