1108, 1114 (8th Cir.1995) ("The ADA does not require that [the employer] take action inconsistent with the contractual rights of other workers under a collective bargaining agreement.”); cf. Shea v. Tisch, 870 F.2d 786, 790 (1st Cir.1989) (employer "not required [under Rehabilitation Act] to accommodate plaintiff further by placing him in a different position since to do so would violate the rights of other employees under the collective bargaining agreement"); Carter v. Tisch, 822 F.2d 465, 469 (4th Cir.1987) (duty to reassign under Rehabilitation Act "would not defeat the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement unless it could be shown that the agreement had the effect or the intent of discrimination”). But see Aka v. Washington Hosp. Ctr., 116 F.3d 876, 894-897 (D.C.Cir.) (<HOLDING>), reh'g en banc granted and judgment vacated,
holding terms of collective bargaining agreement only a factor in weighing reasonableness of accommodation holding that the union owes its representatives a duty to enforce the terms of the negotiated collective bargaining agreement holding that oral agreement made in connection with reinstatement should be treated as part of collective bargaining agreement holding that an employee may sue for breach of a collective bargaining agreement without the union holding that a debtorinpossession could reject a collective bargaining agreement