interlocutory orders and decrees issued under Title 11 section 1121(d), and (3) with leave of court, other interlocutory orders and decrees. See 28 U.S.C. § 158(a). The orders about which Edwards complains are not final judgments, orders, or decrees and neither this Court nor the bankruptcy court has given her leave to appeal those orders. The Court also does not have jurisdiction to strike the alleged “excess verbiage” in the order of remand which petitioner contends may confuse another court. Nor does it have jurisdiction to determine in advance whether the bankruptcy court’s orders will be the “law of the case” in the state court action; that is an issue for the state court to determine. Cf. Commercial Space Management Co., Inc. v. The Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1076 (9th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the
holding that issue in motion for rehearing is waived if original brief is not sufficient to acquaint the court with the issue and does not present an argument that would allow the court to decide the issue holding the issue of use can be necessary to the adjudication by the board of adjustment of the underlying request for a variance when the issue is raised in the context of an issue the board of adjustment is required to decide holding that where an issue is raised in the district court but raised late and the district court declines to deem the issue waived the issue may be raised on appeal holding that issue of whether dismissal was with or without prejudice becomes ripe only when new action is filed and issue is raised the court in the new action should decide the issue holding that an issue is preserved for appeal where the issue was sufficiently raised for the court to rule on it  