words with McKissick and then pulled a pistol; and that McLeod shot McKissick three times in the head at point-blank range. 3 . In Arizona v. Fulminante, 499 U.S. 279, 286 n. 2, 111 S.Ct. 1246, 1252 n. 2, 113 L.Ed.2d 302 (1991), the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the test of voluntariness is whether "a defendant’s will has been overborne” (citing Culombe v. Connecticut, 367 U.S. 568, 81 S.Ct. 1860, 6 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1961)). 4 . Moreover, we note that the mere promise to make cooperation known to law enforcement authorities, as opposed to a direct promise of a reduced sentence, generally is not considered an illegal inducement. In United States v. Nash, 910 F.2d 749, 752-53 (11th Cir.1990), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held: "We find (8th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Guerrero, 847 F.2d 1363 (9th
holding that an officers promise to bring defendants cooperation to the attention of the prosecutor did not make confession involuntary holding that confession was voluntary although agents had promised to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation holding that cooperation was insufficient where the defendants cooperation was based on his confession to the charged crimes holding that federal agents indication to defendant that his cooperation would be reported to the united states attorney did not make defendants confession involuntary holding that agents promise to inform prosecutor of defendants cooperation does not render a subsequent confession involuntary