counterfeit currency exceeds $2,000. We review de novo the court’s implementation of the Sentencing Guidelines. United States v. Reyes-Alvarado, 963 F.2d 1184, 1189 (9th Cir.1992). We hold that the uncut $20 bills were “counterfeit” and properly counted for sentence enhancement. The language of § 2B5.1(b)(l) does not require counterfeit bills be of “passable” quality. They must “purport” to be genuine but need not be mistakable as such. Webster intended to pass the uncut bills eventually as genuine. To do so, he had only to cut them. See United States v. Moran, 470 F.2d 742, 743 (1st Cir.1972)(pre-Guidelines case finding that “a snip with a pair of shears was too inconsequential” for distinguishing counterfeit); accord United States v. Moreno-Pulido, 695 F.2d 1141, 1145 (9th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>). Other circuits have held that incomplete or
holding that a confrontation clause violation constituted harmless error holding that several rigged card games which occurred over a 19 month period constituted a pattern holding that immigration forms must be authenticated holding in a battle of the forms inquiry that a term reserving all rights and remedies for one party did not conflict with an arbitration provision holding that uncut blank green card forms constituted counterfeit instruments