Fund, Inc.) filed an amended proof of claim to change its claim from a secured claim to an unsecured claim. No objection to the amended claim has been filed. Consequently, the allowed unsecured claims now total $169,092.51 (as opposed to the $66.783.15 in allowed unsecured claims as of the date of confirmation). 6 . Joint Exhibit # 2 is a letter from the Debt- or's counsel to counsel for Penn dated December 4, 2006. However, it makes reference to a prior letter from Debtor’s counsel dated October 16, 2006. 7 . It is not obvious to me that an “application deadline” necessarily is a deadline for the delivery of all information supporting a graduate school application — material such as recommendations and transcripts. In 1990), rev’d on other grounds, 934 F.2d 216 (9th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); In re Parham, 56 B.R. 531, 534
holding that a college withholding delivery of transcripts due to an outstanding prepetition debt is an act to collect in violation of the automatic stay holding that university violated the automatic stay by withholding chapter 7 debtors transcripts because the debts were not yet determined nondischargeable holding that college violated stay by not delivering transcript to chapter 7 debtor when debt had not yet been determined dischargeable holding that university violated automatic stay by withholding chapter 13 debtors student transcript but that such action at bar did not rise to the level of contempt holding that student debt declared nondischargeable remains subject to the automatic stay