8, 2005, which was undisputedly after his causes of action accrued. Therefore, at the moment of his Chapter 7 filing, the lawsuit became an asset of his bankruptcy estate to be administered by the trustee. 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1) (2007). Mason contends, however, that, because he scheduled the lawsuit as an asset in his Chapter 7 bankruptcy, and the bankruptcy was later closed without the suit having been administered, the suit was “abandoned” to him. See 11 U.S.C. § 554(c) (2007) (providing that, when a Chapter 7 estate is closed and scheduled property has not been administered, the property is abandoned to the debtor). We decline to consider this argument. First, Mason makes the argument for the first time in his reply brief. See Abdin v. Abdin, 94 Ark. App. 12, 223 S.W.3d 60 (2006) (<HOLDING>). Secondly, Mason did not raise his section
holding that arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are forfeited holding arguments first raised in reply brief are forfeited holding that courts of appeals will generally not consider arguments raised on appeal for first time in reply brief holding that we do not consider arguments raised for the first time in a reply brief holding that we do not address an argument raised for the first time in a litigants reply brief