the Mercedes and gave Charles the two trucks. The circuit court also ruled that the parties were to equally divide the cash values of the insurance policies. The court found that the land on Chinn Springs Road was marital properly and ordered the sale of the |4land, as well as the inventory of the antique shop. The court also accepted the parties’ joint exhibit listing items of personal property, which identified some as marital and others as separate property. The court ordered the items designated as marital property to be sold. The circuit court then directed that the proceeds from the sale of the marital prpperly be used to retire the parties’ debts. The proceeds were to be applied first to the debt on the Kyler Road property, with the remainder used to pay the other 398 (1983) (<HOLDING>). Although a non-owing spouse may be entitled
holding that a trial court may find that a nonowning spouse is entitled to some benefit by reason of marital funds having been used to pay off debts on the owning spouses nonmarital property holding that one spouse may be entitled to a portion of the equity in home purchased with nonmarital funds holding that assets acquired subsequent to separation are not considered marital property absent evidence that spouse used marital property to obtain them holding that a nonowning spouse is entitled to some benefit when marital funds are used to improve nonmarital property holding that circuit court erred in failing to consider that marital property in the form of marital earnings was used to pay debt against nonmarital property