16 . Behagen, 744 F.2d at 733. 17 . OMI Holdings, 149 F.3d at 1091 (quoting Burger King Corp. v. Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 477, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 L.Ed.2d 528 (1985)). 18 . Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 590, 111 S.Ct. 1522, 113 L.Ed.2d 622 (1991). 19 . M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 10, 15, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972); Riley v. Kingsley Underwriting Agencies, Ltd., 969 F.2d 953, 957 (10th Cir.1992). 20 . Riley, 969 F.2d at 958. 21 . Carnival Cruise Lines, 499 U.S. at 588, 111 S.Ct. 1522. 22 . See Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd., 709 F.2d 190, 203 (3d Cir.1983), overruled on other grounds, Lauro Lines v. Chasser, 490 U.S. 495, 109 S.Ct. 1976, 104 L.Ed.2d 548 (1989)); Lambert v. Kysar, 983 F.2d 1110, 1121-22 (1st Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>). 23 . See Mann v. Auto. Prot. Corp., 777
holding that there must be a tort distinguishable from or independent of the breach of contract in order for a party to bring a valid claim in tort based on a breach in a contractual relationship holding that contractrelated tort claims involving the same operative facts as a parallel claim for breach of contract should be heard in the forum selected by the contracting parties holding that a breach of contract claim against one defendant related back to interference with contract claim against that defendant and breach of contract claim against second defendant because it was based on same set of operative facts holding that a claim is barred by res judicata if it arises out of the same nucleus of operative facts as the prior claim holding that breach of contract claim related back to misrepresentation claim because operative facts upon which the breach of contract claim was based were contained in the misrepresentation counts of the original complaint