Twitter Archive, http://radar.oreilly.com/ 2011/06/library-of-congress-twitter-archive.html [accessed June 11, 2012].) 9 . See http://untweetable.com; http://tweleted.com/; http://mashable.com/ 2012/05/30/politwoops/. 10 . See Kaufman v Nest Seekers, LLC, 2006 WL 2807177, *5, 2006 US Dist LEXIS 71104, *15-16 (SD NY 2006) (only electronic bulletin boards which are not readily accessible to the public are protected under the SCA); Konop v Hawaiian Airlines, Inc., 302 F3d 868, 875 (9th Cir 2002) (“The legislative history of the [Electronic Communications Protection Act] suggests that Congress wanted to protect electronic communications that are configured to be private, such as email and private electronic bulletin boards”); Snow v DirecTV, Inc., 450 F3d 1314, 1320-1321 (11th Cir 2006) (<HOLDING>). 11 . Orin Kerr, A User’s Guide to the Stored
holding that title ii does not apply to the states holding the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the actions of the federal government holding that the sca does not apply to material that is readily available to the public holding that the confrontation clause does not apply to the sentencing hearing holding that  1447c does not apply to counsel