Court, extensively reviewed decisions of this Court and the Court of Special Appeals dealing with the sufficiency of evidence to support a conviction for possession. In Garrison, police officers executed a search warrant at the home of Shirley Garrison and her husband Ernest Garrison based on probable cause that heroin was being sold from the Garrison home. Upon entering a rear bedroom, the officers saw Mr. Garrison flushing a plastic bag down the toilet. Mrs. Garrison was found in the front bedroom, where no contraband was discovered. Garrison, 272 Md. at 126-27, 321 A.2d at 769. The Court held that there was insufficient evidence to support Mrs. Garrison’s conviction for possession with intent to distribute heroin because there was no evidence that she was engaged 2d 495, 498 (1972) (<HOLDING>); Puckett v. State, 13 Md.App. 584, 587-88, 284
holding evidence insufficient to support conviction for possession when defendant merely present in an apartment in which a womans purse and a cigarette case containing heroin were found holding that evidence that the utilities at a residence where heroin was sold were listed in defendants name that an army identification card bearing the defendants name and other papers belonging to the defendant were located in the same bedroom where heroin was found and that a sixteenyear old obtained heroin from the house and sold it at defendants direction was sufficient to have the jury consider whether the defendant possessed the heroin under a theory of constructive possession holding evidence insufficient for conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances when the drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other persons on the premises holding evidence sufficient to prove possession of heroin with intent to distribute where defendant secreted heroin for another knowing of others intent to sell the heroin holding that statements by defendant and apartment manager that defendant lived in the apartment where drugs were found demonstrated his control over the apartment even though no documents personal effects or keys were found