11 Agreement lacks a description or itemized list of the “ballroom furniture” or the “equipment, telephone systems, and security system.” Appellants also argue that the phrase “take over control” as it pertains to the common areas and collecting assessments and expenditures is undefined and overbroad. The essential or material terms of a contract, whether oral or written, must be definite, certain, and clear and, if they are not, the contract is unenforceable. T.O. Stanley Boot Co. v. Bank of El Paso, 847 S.W.2d 218, 221 (Tex.1992); Southern v. Goetting, 353 S.W.3d 295, 299-301 (Tex.App.-El Paso 2011, pet. denied); Meru v. Huerta, 136 S.W.3d 383, 390 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 2004, no pet.); see, e.g., Loeffler v. Lytle ISD, 211 S.W.3d 331, 346 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). The issue of whether a Rule 11 settlement
holding that an attorney approval clause in a contract for the sale of real estate was a part of that contract and would have to be satisfied for the underlying contract to be enforceable holding that a contract to sell real property was unenforceable because it did not contain a sufficient description of land subject to contract holding contract for sale of water which did not specify price was unenforceable because price of water was essence of contract holding unenforceable a contract for real estate commissions formed by an unlicensed corporation holding unenforceable a real estate contract that provided for the payment of brokerage fees to an unlicensed corporation