see also id. at 11-12. An offer' is “the manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it.” Restatement (Second) Contracts (“Restatement”) § 24 (1981). Thus, as the court recognized, the acceptance of an offer may be manifested by “assent to the terms thereof made by the offeree in a manner invited or required by the offer.” American Capital I, 58 Fed.Cl. at 407 (citing Restatement § 50(1)). Since the August 29, 1986 Assistance Agreement incorporated “a resolution or action of the [FHLBB] approving, or adopted concurrently with, this Agreement,” it manifested acceptance of the offer contained in FHLBB Resolution 86-864. See Winstar, 518 U.S. at 890, 116 S.Ct. 2432 (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the Government’s November 17,
holding the court has the inherent authority to enter an order of confidentiality recognizing that the fhlbb and fslic had authority to enter into a contract allowing capital credits and supervisory goodwill to be recognized as an asset in determining a partyinstitutions regulatory compliance holding that while town counsel had final supervisory authority over the hiring and firing of employees in plaintiffs position it did not have supervisory authority over the mayors constructive discharge of plaintiff holding that the defendant had minimum contacts with kansas because it chose to enter into a contract with the plaintiff that was to be performed at least in part in kansas and then the defendant continued to be in contact with the plaintiff regarding the contract recognizing the supervisory power of appellate courts