father did so here'. No putative father had standing here.' Under section 63:089, “[a]n unmarried biological father does not have standing to seek relief from a judgment terminating parental rights if the mother did not identify him to the adoption entity before the date she signed a consent for adoption 'or if he was not located because the mother failed or refused to provide sufficient information to locate him.” § 63.089, Fla. Stat. (2015); see also id. § 63.022 (providing that unmarried biological father’s interests “acquire[ ] constitutional protection only when he detoon-strates a timely and full commitment to the responsibilities - of parenthood, both during the pregnancy and after the child’s birth”); Lehr v. Robertson, 463 U.S. 248, 261, 103 S.Ct. 2985, 77 L.Ed.2d 614 (1983) (<HOLDING>). Even assuming, without deciding, that the
recognizing the existence of the special relationship holding that plaintiff cannot be the only link between the defendant and the forum holding that mere reference to a collective bargaining agreement does not confer federal question jurisdiction under section 301a recognizing that the mere existence of a biological link does not confer legal rights without the fathers full commitment to the responsibilities of parenthood holding that the mere delivery of documents  does not confer jurisdiction