could only be for gain from the sale of those assets which were “not administered” by the trustee before the bankruptcy case was closed. To determine whether each asset sale — the livestock sale, the grain sale and the machinery sale — was conducted as part of the administration of the estate or occurred after the assets were abandoned to the debtor requires an examination of the interests that the trustee retained in each of the assets sold. The livestock sale was conducted before the trustee conducted the first meeting of creditors and before the trustee filed the Report. Abandonment did not occur under Section 554(c) until the case was closed on March 24, 1992. Exhibit G. Even though the property was not abandoned pursuant to Section 554, the trustee and the United (9th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); First Nat’l Bank of Maryland v. United States
holding that the automatic stay terminates as to the debtor personally and as to his nonestate property but that the stay persists as to property of the bankruptcy estate holding that the bankruptcy court relinquishes jurisdiction over estate property when it grants relief from the automatic stay holding that bankruptcy court order that a stay applied to a particular party was a final order and noting that bankruptcy court orders lifting or denying relief from an automatic stay are final for purposes of appeal holding that if property is not part of the individuals estate at the time he files a bankruptcy petition no automatic stay provision applies to the property holding secured creditors refusal to turn over property of debtors estate to debtor upon demand constituted an exercise of control over such property in violation of automatic stay