that Cam-bareri possessed a firearm but that he did not use it. This does not appear to be a jury pardon but rather a compromise verdict. Although we do not know the jury position law was clear and not subject to argument or discussion. It should have advised the jury that if it had any disagreement about the law, the court would clear the law for the jury. Third, the court advised the jury that the judge would wait in the courtroom for its decision. This again gave immediacy to the jury’s deliberation. Finally, the court pointed out the amount of time already spent by the court on the matter and stated “we need to make sure that there is no way to reconcile the differences and reach a unanimous decision, which is required.” See Bell v. State, 311 So.2d 179, 180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) (<HOLDING>). Because of the strong possibility that the
holding that court must construe statute as whole giving meaning to all parts so that no part is superfluous holding when a juror asks do all six have to agree and the court replies yes maam the jury may construe this as meaning a verdict must be reached holding that after court dismissed case at plaintiffs request notwithstanding the fact that jury had deliberated upon the case and indicated that it had reached a verdict there was no case pending in court on which a verdict could be predicated and the information which the judge got from an inspection of the petition handed to him by the foreman of the jury was information which he received as an individual and not as a judge of the court and further holding that despite violation of defendants right to receive the verdict that was purportedly reached the writing incorporated in the bill of exceptions as a verdict of the jury was in law no verdict because it was not received in court and published as required by law and was instead entirely extraneous and extrajudicial holding that the jury need agree only that the defendant committed firstdegree murder not on the theory by which it reached the verdict recognizing that the court must give meaning to all the words in the claims