or intentionally caused, or permitted her child to be exposed to, to ingest or inhale, or to have contact with a controlled substance, chemical substance, or drug paraphernalia following A.S.’s birth.” B [¶ 5] In April 2012, the State charged Hettieh with two counts of endangerment of a child, after Hettieh gave birth to twins who had methamphetamine present in their systems. [¶ 6] At a preliminary hearing, Officer Ryan Zimmerman testified that a urinalysis first revealed that Hettieh and the twin children had methamphetamine in their systems. A subsequent meconium, an infant’s first stool, test was performed. John Doe I tested positive for methamphetamine, and John Doe II tested negative. Officer Zimmerman al 997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1145, 118 S.Ct. 1857, 140 L.Ed.2d 1104 (1998) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 23] The facts of some of the
holding that the defendant mother could not be charged with endangering the welfare of a child based upon prenatal acts endangering an unborn child holding that mother could not be charged with criminal endangering the welfare of her child based upon prenatal acts of smoking cocaine holding that mother could not be prosecuted under child abuse statute for prenatal use of heroin holding that mother may not be prosecuted criminally for child endangerment for prenatal substance abuse holding a woman may be prosecuted for child neglect and endangering a child for prenatal substance abuse