hypothetical scenario in which the taxpayer’s liability increases while its in-state activities diminish, with no causal connection between the two, is an insufficient basis for a finding of facial unconstitutionality. 22 . This maimer of presentation, as well as the absence of additional descriptive data such as the net average income/profits of subsidiary corporations, see infra, substantially constrains a reviewing tribunal in terms of its ability to assess fairness in application of the taxing statute other than strictly on the terms dictated by the taxpayer. 23 . Although Pennsylvania thus hybridizes consolidated and unconsolidated factors in determining the franchise tax base, such approach is not wholly aberrant. See Container Corp., 463 U.S. at 168 n. 5, 103 S.Ct. at 2942 n. 5 (<HOLDING>). 24 . See 14A Fletcher Cyclopedia of Private
recognizing that some states it should be noted have adopted a hybrid approach holding that a knew or should have known standard applies to triggering of statute of limitations for action against union in hybrid  301 action holding that while some courts have adopted the intent to silence requirement we see no reason why the forfeiture doctrine should be limited to such cases recognizing that texas courts have adopted section 324a holding that wills should be construed by the law as it existed when the testator died thereby excluding adopted children as beneficiaries unless the will indicates an intent to include adopted children