the SOTP materials to his own expert, Dr. Warren. In the report, Dr. Warren acknowledged that he received and reviewed the materials Bolander claims are privileged. Bolander did not assert the psychotherapist-patient privilege prior to his disclosure to Dr. Warren. Rather, he waited until approximately one month pri- or to the evidentiary hearing to do so, even though the case had been pending in the district court for quite some time. By failing to timely assert the psychotherapist — patient privilege, Bolander waived whatever privilege he may have had. Put another way, it was incumbent upon Bolander to assert the psychotherapist — patient privilege in a timely fashion, rather than waiting until the eleventh hour to do so. See United States v. Ary, 518 F.3d 775, 784-85 (10th Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>); United States v. White, 970 F.2d 328, 334-35
holding that failure to brief an argument constitutes waiver holding that governmental entities may assert attorneyclient privilege to prevent disclosure of information otherwise required by statute holding that failure to timely assert attorneyclient privilege constitutes waiver holding that the information is not protected by attorneyclient privilege holding failure to brief argument constitutes waiver