use provision of § 16-8-107(1), C.R.S. (1990 Cum.Supp.) is raised for the first time on appeal. His objection to the witness’ testimony in the trial court was based on relevancy under CRE 401 and 403 and, alternatively, the witness’ inability to recall clearly the defendant’s statements. Having failed to r, that permits an appellate court to address issues not raised below where plain error requires consideration of the issues. Larkin, 177 Colo. at 161, 493 P.2d at 3 (requiring serious prejudicial error); see also People v. Hampton, 746 P.2d 947, 953 n. 11 (Colo.1987) (noting that failure to object in district court on grounds asserted on appeal is deemed to waive the objection unless the alleged error rises to plain error); Dorador v. Cronin, 199 Colo. 85, 86, 605 P.2d 53, 54 (1980) (<HOLDING>); Cox v. Pearl Inv. Co., 168 Colo. 67, 71, 450
holding that issues raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice holding that appellate court will not pass on issues that have not been presented for determination in district court except in case of plain or fundamental error recognizing plain or fundamental error holding that issues raised for first time on appeal generally will not be considered absent exceptional circumstances of plain error or fundamental miscarriage of justice holding that subject to limited exceptions this court will not consider issues not presented to the district court but raised for the first time on appeal