Fifth, grants a federal reserve bank the power to “dismiss” any of its officers, among others, “at pleasure” by its board of directors: holding to the effect that section 341, Fifth, has been impliedly amended by Title VII); Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 835 F.Supp. 751, 752-753 (consistent with such a holding); Moodie v. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (S.D.N.Y. 1993) 831 F.Supp. 333, 337 (same); ly amended by Title VII and the ADEA, effectively establishes a maximum level of protection for officers of a national bank that FEHA may not exceed, we assume for present purposes that the provision has not been impliedly amended or repealed by other federal law. See post, footnote 8 on page 176. 6 See Booth v. Old Nat. Bank, supra, 900 F.Supp. at pages 842-843 (<HOLDING>); Sargent v. Central Nat. Bank & Trust Co.,
holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea that section 24 fifth preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts holding outside of the context of title vii or the adea to the effect that section 341 fifth preempts conflicting state law holding that a state election law is preempted only to the extent that it conflicts with federal law holding to the effect that section 341 fifth as impliedly amended by title vii preempts state law to the extent but only to the extent that it conflicts holding to the effect that section 24 fifth has been impliedly amended by title vii