months of imprisonment as an upward departure. The court explicitly stated that § 5K2.0(a)(2)(B) permits the departure, explaining that “I think that the upward departure is warranted in this case.” Our review will therefore focus on whether this adjustment was a proper departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(a)(2)(B). 1. Evaluation of whether U.S.S.G. § 5K2.0(a)(2)(B) or § 2K2J(b 2.0(a)(2)(B) departure was appropriate here because the evidence does not show that Freeman’s planned robbery of the undercover agent was necessarily subject to the § 2K2.1(b)(6) enhancement. An enhancement pursuant to § 2K2.1(b)(6) requires that the firearm possessed in connection with another felony be connected to the firearm that is the subject of the underlying firearm-possession charge. Hoiuse, 478 F.3d at 733 (<HOLDING>). The record here does not show that the
holding that to enhance a sentence because of the defendants use of a firearm the jury must find the defendant guilty of a crime involving a firearm or otherwise specifically find that a firearm was used holding that a defendant possessed a firearm in connection with a crime when the firearm was kept in a car across the street from where the defendant was selling drugs holding that to apply the firearm enhancement the firearm need only reflect the context of the defendants possession and the defendants ability to use the firearm to promote the controlled substance offense holding that the application of the enhancement for using a firearm in connection with another felony offense is proper only if there is a clear connection between the firearm that was used in the other offense and the one that was used in the offense of conviction holding that the enhancement applied where the defendant possessed a firearm in connection with possessing methamphetamine