his unencrypted personal information to be stolen); In re iPhone Application Litig., 2011 WL 4403963 at *14 (finding no loss of money or property where plaintiffs, users of mobile devices, alleged that defendants violated their privacy rights by allowing third-party application developers to collect and make use of their personal information for commercial purposes, without user consent or knowledge); Thompson v. Home Depot, Inc., No. 07-cv-1058-IEG, 2007 WL 2746603, at *3 (S.D.Cal. Sept. 18, 2007) (finding no loss of money or property where plaintiff alleged that defendant required customers to provide their personal information as a condition to performing a credit card transaction and used such information for marketing purposes); cf. In re Jetblue Airways, 379 F.Supp.2d at 327 (<HOLDING>); In re Double-Click, 154 F.Supp.2d at 525
holding that economic loss rule precludes recovery of economic damages only in the absence of personal injury or property  damage claims holding that airlines disclosure of passengers personal information to thirdparty data mining company in violation of airlines privacy policy did not amount to a compensable economic loss holding that economic loss rule barred negligence claim because plaintiff could not show drug testing company had duty to protect against loss of his job as result of allegedly faulty test recognizing as a privacy right the individual interest in avoiding disclosure of personal matters recognizing a right to privacy in avoiding disclosure of personal matters