is not necessary for the Court to deny a motion to amend on the basis of undue delay, which is inherently prejudicial to the opposing party. See Fire & Police Pension, 778 F.3d at 247. In any event,- the harm here to Cyberonics from the lengthy delays and repeated efforts to amend the complaint are sufficient to establish the requisite degree of prejudice. - Under the circumstances, Hagerty’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint will be denied because of undue delay. III. Cyberonics’ Motion Compel Arbitration and Dismiss the Remaining Two Counts A. Legal Standard The Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-301, governs the enforcement of written arbitration agreements. See Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams, 532 U.S. 105, 119, 121, S.Ct. 1302, 149 L.Ed.2d 234 (2001) (<HOLDING>). It was enacted in order to reverse
holding the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment extends the right to jury trial to defendants in serious criminal cases in state courts holding that the district court lacked the authority to compel arbitration  because the faa is inapplicable to employees who are engaged in interstate commerce holding that in the employment context only transportation workers employment contracts are exempted from the faas coverage holding that mandatory arbitration agreements in the employment context fall under the faa holding that the faa extends to employment cases for employees other than those engaged in transportation