statutory authority when it adjudicated a dispute not within the Alaska Public Utilities Commission Act. In so holding, it approvingly quoted a Washington Supreme Court opinion containing the following passage: It is well settled ... that a public service commission is an administrative agency created by statute and as such has no inherent powers, but only such as have been expressly granted to it by the legislature or have, by implication, been conferred upon it as necessarily incident to the exercise of those powers expressly granted. Id. at 1033 n. 19. Even though the legislature did not expressly give the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board authority to set aside a C & R for fraud, we conclude that the power to do so has “by implication, b N.J.Super. 510, 385 A.2d 257 (A.D. 1978) (<HOLDING>). In addition, the Florida Court of Appeal,
holding that the workmens compensation division has that power inherent in all tribunals to reopen judgments in instances of fraud holding that this court has inherent as well as express statutory authority to punish for contempt recognizing use of ancillary jurisdiction in subsequent proceedings for the exercise of the courts inherent power to enforce its judgments holding dqrrespective of the absence of express statutory authority and a one year limitation imposed upon such a reopening in certain circumstances  it is abundantly clear that the division has the inherent power comparable to that possessed by the courts  to reopen judgments for fraud mistake inadvertence or other equitable ground  citation omitted emphasis omitted holding that the district court possessed the inherent judicial authority to empanel a resentencing jury on remand from  reversal of the respondents enhanced sentence and because the district court erred by failing to recognize that it possessed this inherent judicial authority boehl reversed and remanded for the district courts discretionary determination of whether to exercise that authority