and her poor motivation, undermined her credibility — also is supported by the record. See Thomas v. Barnhart, 278 F.3d 947, 959 (9th Cir.2 easons for giving less weight to the contradicted opinion of treating physician Dr. Nelson where: the opinion was conclusory, see Meanel v. Apfel, 172 F.3d 1111, 1113-14 (9th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>); the opinion relied in part on Smith’s
holding that a conclusory opinion may be rejected holding that the weight given to a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements holding that the weight given a treating physicians opinion is limited if the opinion consists only of conclusory statements holding that a treating physicians opinion may be rejected if it is brief conclusory and unsupported by medical evidence holding that allegations against nondiverse defendants must be factual not conclusory because conclusory allegations do not state a claim