statute. The question which inquires of the jury how much to award by way of exemplary damages does not break down the amounts to be awarded per cause of action. Victoria did not object to the form of the issue as submitted. We cannot, from the record, determine how much of the punitives awarded are attributable to which causes of action. Point fourteen is overruled. Point fifteen also complains of several matters related to the award of punitive damages. Victoria argues that the Excessive Fines Clause of Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution constitutes a check on the power of juries to award punitive damages in civil cases. This court has held that such is not the case. Underwriters Life Insurance Co. v. Cobb, 746 S.W.2d 810, 817 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1988, no writ) (<HOLDING>). This Court’s interpretation of that clause
holding the eighth amendment inapplicable to an award of exemplary damages holding a court may not award punitive damages holding that provision in wrongful death act that allowed parents to recover exemplary damages was invalid under art 16  26 since legislature could not enlarge on exemplary damages holding that the record supported the district courts award of damages holding that regardless of dischargeability of exemplary damages under section 523a6 punitive damages flowing from the same course of fraudulent conduct necessitating an award of compensatory damages are not dischargeable in bankruptcy under section 523a2a