Prop.Code Ann. § 202.003(a). Notice A purchaser is bound only by those restrictive covenants of which he has actual or constructive notice. Davis v. Huey, 620 S.W.2d 561, 565-66 (Tex.1981). Jennings concedes that he had notice of the deed restriction prohibiting mobile homes, but argues that because of his independent research and the information he received from government agencies, he was acting on a good-faith belief that his home did not violate the restriction. Jennings’s good-faith belief, however, is irrelevant. A purchaser is bound by restrictive covenants of which he has notice, regardless of whether he believed that his actions violated the restriction. See Pheasant Run Homeowners Assoc., Inc. v. Kastor, 47 S.W.3d 747, 758-54 (TexApp.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2001, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Tien Tao Assoc., Inc. v. Kingsbridge Park
holding that property owners who are aware of deed restrictions and accompanying guidelines are considered to be on notice of such restrictions despite believing that guidelines are unclear and inapplicable holding that commentary accompanying guidelines is binding holding district courts are entitled to vary from the guidelines based on a policy disagreement with those guidelines holding that property owner could not argue it had no notice of deed restrictions simply because guidelines were unclear when owner acknowledged having copy of such restrictions holding that the cocaine guidelines  are advisory only