of erroneous deprivation of provider status is also quite manageable.” Northlake Community Hosp., 654 F.2d at 1242. A termination decision is well-documented and typically is based on survey reports from unbiased health professionals who apply well-defined criteria developed, through the administrative process; the provider has the opportunity to submit written material in response to the survey findings so that a hearing likely is not necessary for the provider to present its position. See id. (relying 98 L.Ed.2d 968 (1988); Ritter v. Cohen, 797 F.2d 119, 123 (3d Cir.1986) (concluding that a physician faced with termination of participation in the Medicaid program is not entitled to a pre-termination hearing under Eldridge); Geriatrics, Inc. v. Harris, 640 F.2d 262, 265 (10th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 832, 102 S.Ct. 129, 70
holding that a nursing home participating in the medicaid program is not entitled to a pretermination hearing holding that a physician is not entitled to a formal hearing before being suspended from the medicare program under eldridge holding that due process does not require the state to provide an impartial decisionmaker at the pretermination hearing where posttermination remedies are available holding physician not entitled to hearing prior to termination in a medicare program under eldridge holding that a limited pretermination hearing was sufficient where it was followed by a more comprehensive posttermination hearing