a violation of its protections. We are not persuaded. Mikeska allegedly suffers from a stomach ulcer. There is no suggestion, however, that prison officials knowingly assigned him to a work detail which they knew would aggravate his ailment. Jackson v. Cain, 864 F.2d at 1246 (When the type or work to which the convict is assigned admittedly worsens a pathological condition, the work must be deemed cruel and unusual punishment if it was assigned with knowledge of the medical condition and that the condition would be worsened thereby, or if the work was continued with the same knowledge.). Moreover, a review of the TDCJ medical records shows that Mikeska received adequate medical attention for his stomach problem. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (<HOLDING>). Finally, Diez contends that forcing inmates
holding that deliberate indifference to a serious medical need establishes an eighth amendment violation holding that the eighth amendment protects prisoners only from deliberate indifference to their serious medical needs holding that in order to state a violation of the eighth amendment an inmate must demonstrate that prison officials showed deliberate indifference to serious medical needs holding that a sentence of incarceration would constitute deliberate indifference to defendants medical needs holding that deliberate indifference to prisoners medical needs is cruel and unusual punishment