the FDA’s statutory duty to take appropriate action to ensure drug safety.” Id. at 1083. This is markedly distinguishable from the instant case because the Reports at issue here contained more than just statistics insofar as they “rel[ied] on information supplied by outside [non-government] sources,” and “contained] evaluations or statements of opinion by a public official.” Lee, 698 So.2d at 1201. In line with our decision in Benjamin, other cases have also established that the first category of the exception, known as the “activities” category, is intended to encompass only those public records of a factual nature involving the core functions of a government agency, not advocacy reports or compilations and reviews of outside research or contributions. Compare Darragh, 95 So.3d at 900 (<HOLDING>), with Gatlin v. State, 618 So.2d 765, 766
holding that amtrak is an agency of the government  for purposes of the constitutional obligations of government holding that printouts of government website allowing users to estimate potential military benefits based upon users assumptions about the future were inadmissible under section 908038 as they did not simply set forth the activities of a government agency holding that government entities are subject to suit under section 1983 when the alleged unconstitutional conduct results from an official government policy or from practices of government officials that are so wellsettled as to constitute a custom or usage with the force of law holding that despite district courts restriction on crossexamination of government witness concerning the sentencing benefits he would earn through testifying for the government it did not violate defendants confrontation rights because of defense counsels effective impeachment of the government witnesses credibility and sentence reduction holding that the defendant engaged in content development outside the scope of the cdas immunity provision by creating a system that required users to disclose whether they were members of certain protected classes and allowed other users to screen housing applicants based on that information