Worldwide Express, 294 F.3d 1179, 1183-84 (9th Cir. 2002) 15 . Grable & Sons Metal Prods., Inc. v. Darue Eng’g & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308, 314, 125 S.Ct. 2363, 162 L.Ed.2d 257 (2005). 16 . Rivet v. Regions Bank of Louisiana, 522 U.S. 470, 475, 118 S.Ct. 921, 139 L.Ed.2d 912 (1998). 17 . Retail Property Trust v. United Broth. of Carpenters and Joiners of America, 768 F.3d 938, 947 (9th Cir. 2014). 18 . Caterpillar Inc., 482 U.S. at 392, 107 S.Ct. 2425. 19 . Wayne, 294 F.3d at 1183-84. 20 . The three are: (1) § 301 of the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185; (2) § 502(a) of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a); and (3) §§ 85 and 86 of t id not preempt passenger's state-law claim alleging that airplane stairs were defectively designed because FAA does not pervasively regulate airstairs); Ventress, 747 F.3d at 722-23 (<HOLDING>). My narrow reading of Montalvo and Martin is
holding that plaintiffs claim that medical providers did not comply with baker act was not subject to medical malpractice statutes ajlthough a medical diagnosis is necessary in order to involuntarily commit a patient the process of complying with the statute does not require medical skill or judgment holding that an aljs own medical analysis which is contrary to medical evidence is invalid recognizing that prison officials should defer to medical professionals on medical matters holding that state medical director of prison medical services corporation was not final policymaker holding that faas pervasive pilot medical standards preempted wrongfuldischarge claims that required determination of a pilots medical fitness to fly