Robert and Elaine sought a disproportionate share of the martial estate. Elaine argued that she was entitled to a disproportionate share of the parties’ estate because of the alleged cruelty include findings that characterized and valued each asset or liability on which disputed evidence was presented at the bench trial. See Tex. Family Code Ann. § 6.711 (Vernon 2006) (requiring, on request of party, findings of fact and conclusions of law concerning "the characterization of each party’s assets, liabilities, claims, and offsets on which disputed evidence has been presented” and "the value or amount of the community estate’s assets, liabilities, claims, and offsets on which disputed evidence has been presented”); Limbaugh v. Limbaugh, 71 S.W.3d 1, 7 & n. 2 (Tex.App.-Waco 2002, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). However, Elaine does not complain about the
holding that balancing must be based on factual findings holding remand proper on circuit courts own motion in a workers compensation case where the commission failed to make essential findings of fact because to hold otherwise would in such cases make the determination of the rights of the parties turn upon the neglect of the commission to make essential findings of fact or require the appellate court to make the omitted findings of fact which our statute forbids holding the trial court must make findings adequate to support a closure holding that trial court must make findings of fact on all material factual issues that involve ultimate issues in divorce and must make findings that characterize and value each asset or liability on which disputed evidence was presented recognizing appellate courts must not make fact findings