this court, the grass and lack of improvements to the platted location of Foote Street demonstrated by the photographs provided to this court by plaintiffs are, at best, evidence of mere disuse and, thus, insufficient to establish an intention to abandon Foote Street by Farragut. See Stecklein v. City of Cascade, 693 N.W.2d at 337, 341 (finding no evidence of an intent to abandon platted street by city where the city had failed to open street for 120 years after it was platted, the platted street was enclosed, along with an adjacent private property, in a thirty to forty-year-old fence, additional fences crossed the platted street itself, and there was “no visible use of any of the platted streets” other than a gravel road leading to a house); Sioux City v. Johnson, 165 N.W.2d at 767 (<HOLDING>); see also Town of Marne v. Goeken, 259 Iowa
holding that evidence that vehicular and pedestrian traffic had never existed on platted street that the city had never at tempted to grade improve or open the street and that the trees grass and shrubs which were growing on the street were mere evidence of nonuse insufficient to demonstrate abandonment holding evidence insufficient for conviction for possession of controlled dangerous substances when the drugs were not found on the person of or in the same room as the defendant but were only found on other persons on the premises holding evidence insufficient to establish defendant had physical or constructive possession of heroin when no drugs were found on his person and the only drugs discovered on the premises which he shared with the codefendant were secreted out of plain view holding that government may search for mere evidence of a crime and that in the case of mere evidence probable cause must be examined in terms of cause to believe that the evidence sought will aid in a particular apprehension or conviction holding that on a motion for summary judgment the mere existence of a scintilla of evidence in support of the plaintiffs position will be insufficient and there must be evidence on which the jury could reasonably find for the plaintiff