(<HOLDING>); but see Ludewig v. Houston Pipeline Co., 737
holding that because the order lacked an independent basis it was an abuse of discretion to issue the mutual restraining order holding that failure to include right to appeal in statute indicated legislature did not intend to permit appeal from denial of temporary restraining order holding that violations of a courts temporary restraining order can be redressed as an unlawful act claim under the ucl holding injunction was proper after state court entered a temporary restraining order against defendants many of whom were also defendants in a federal multidistrict action because the restraining order would interfere with the multidistrict courts ability to dispose of the action before it holding temporary restraining order void because court waived bond