however, does not limit the Trustee’s rights to curing default. For example in United Bank of Ariz. v. Sun Mesa Corp., 119 F.R.D. 430, 431 (D.Ariz.1988), another Division of this Court held that the Trustee lacked standing to bring securities fraud claims on behalf of bondholders because the indenture at issue limited the trustee to curing default. In so holding, the court noted that “[s]tanding was absent because the relevant agreements only provided the Bank with standing to cure default on the underlying loan. Since the fraud claims could have been asserted regardless of breach, the claims were not a remedy for default.” Id. Other cases, relied on by Defendants, apply the same approach. See e.g., Regions Bank v. Blount Parrish & Co., 2001 WL 726989, at *5 (N.D.Ill. June 27, 2001) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added). The Indenture of Trust in
holding that the plain language of the act appears to permit private actions by corporations both in permitting any persondefined to include corporations  to bring an action and in its broad definition of the unlawful acts and practices including any unfair or deceptive act in the conduct of any trade or commerce within new hampshire holding that though pjlaintiff was given the power under the ijndenture to pursue any available remedy  that language refers only to actions designed to collect the principal of premium if any or interest on the bonds or to enforce the performance of any provision of the bonds or the indenture holding that any property in which the taxpayer has any right title or interest is subject to foreclosure proceeding including property in which others claim an interest so long as all persons having liens or claiming any interest in the property are joined as parties to the suit holding that rule 10b5 does not impose any duty on an indenture trustee which is not in the indenture itself holding that an officer or employee of the tennessee valley authority was not an officer or employee acting under the authority of the united states or any department or any officer of the government thereof within the meaning of a criminal statute first enacted in 1884