discrimination against the disabled.” Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509, 124 S.Ct. 1978, 158 L.Ed.2d 820 (2004). Therefore, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and consequently the UPR, are immune to all monetary claims filed under Title I. Torres-Alamo v. Puerto Rico, 502 F.3d 20 (1st Cir.2007). In the instant matter, Plaintiff only sued under Title V, not Title I. The UPR claims that it is immune from suit under the ADA, but the First Circuit has yet to rule on whether the Eleventh Amendment immunity applies to Title V as it does to Title I. However, this Court recently held that the sovereign immunity analysis in a Title V retaliation claim is governed by the applicability of sovereign immunity of the underlying Title I, II, or III claim. See Collazo-Rosado, 775 F.Supp.2d at 387-88 (<HOLDING>). The Collazo-Rosado court held that: “The
holding that the feres doctrine bars a military prisoners claims for monetary damages holding that the eleventh amendment immunity bars title i employment discrimination claims against a state for monetary damages holding that state sovereign immunity bars state constitutional claims holding that eleventh amendment bars federal suits against state courts holding that the eleventh amendment bars retrospective declaratory relief against state officials