in the record on appeal. 5 . For the valuation proceedings alone, OOC-EA incurred 2,888 attorney hours and 1,005 paralegal hours, for which it compensated its attorneys a total of $672,000. It was also paid $150,000 for the cost phase of the trial. 6 . OOCEA does not challenge the fees awarded for the supplemental proceedings. 7 . The Third District has also determined that fees in inverse condemnation cases, which obviously do not involve a written offer, are governed by section 73.092(2). City of N. Miami Beach v. Reed, 863 So.2d 351, 355 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). 8 . There seems to be no real complaint in this case regarding the failure to separate Minis try’s interests from Doerr's. 9 . See Pensacola Scrap Processors, Inc. v. State Rd. Dep’t, 188 So.2d 38, 41 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966) (<HOLDING>); but see Fibreglas Fabricators, Inc. v.
holding that in determining the value of a partys nonmarital contribution to hybrid property under code  201073a3 the important factor is the value that improvements add to the property not their cost holding that the debtor could retain exempt property because it was not property of the estate holding that because property was no longer property of the estate the court could not order turnover holding lessee of property who holds monthtomonth tenancyatwill is entitled to compensation for value of leasehold estate including the cost of removal of personal property from the lands condemned recognizing that exempt property ceases to be property of the estate