attempted to cover up the murder. The State’s theory was that appellant disposed of the .22 caliber murder weapon in an attempt to cover up his crime. We disagree. The admission of the .22 caliber rifle found at appellant’s home does not provide a basis to rationally infer that he disposed of the actual murder weapon. The State suggests that in order to prove a cover up it is relevant to focus on what was not found at the murder location. We agree that the State properly introduced evidence that the police searched the house and were unable to find the murder weapon. To prove that their investigation was thorough, the State introduced without objection the testimony of Ronald Andreja k to see if the defendant was prejudiced. Scherrer v. State, 294 Ark. 227, 742 S.W.2d 877 (1988) (<HOLDING>). We have already concluded that there was
holding that prosecutorial misconduct was harmless in the face of overwhelming evidence of guilt holding that error from the erroneous admission of evidence was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendants guilt holding improperly admitted evidence was harmless error given the overwhelming evidence of guilt holding the fact that defendant passed the time watching sex and horror movies was irrelevant but the error was harmless as the prejudicial effect was minimal and the evidence of guilt so overwhelming holding the error harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt