failure to file those two complaints. By order entered June 8, 2011, 2011 WL 2294193, the District Court granted the IFP motion but dismissed the complaint under § 1915(e)(2)(B), concluding that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This appeal followed. II. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Our review of a District Court’s sua sponte dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim is plenary, requiring us to draw all reasonable inferences therefrom in the plaintiffs favor. Allah v. Seiverling, 229 F.3d 220, 223 (3d Cir.2000). On review, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment because no substantial issue is presented on appeal. See L.A.R. 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6; see also Erie Telecomms. v. Erie, 853 F.2d 1084, 1089, n. 10 (3d Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>). Like prisoners, individuals who are
holding that an appellate court may affirm the result reached by a district court on alternative grounds holding we may affirm on any grounds supported by the record even those not relied upon by the district court holding that a district courts ruling may be upheld on an alternative ground supported by the record recognizing this court may affirm for any reason supported by the record holding that we may affirm on an alternative basis supported by the record