with a state's control over public utility rates. The Act provides in pertinent part: The district courts shall not enjoin, suspend or restrain the operation of, or compliance with, any order affecting rates chargeable by a public utility and made by a State administrative agency or a rate-making body of a State political subdivision, where: (1) Jurisdiction is based solely on diversity of citizenship or repugnance of the order to the Federal Constitution; and, (2) The order does not interfere with interstate commerce; and, (3) The order has been made after reasonable notice and hearing; and, (4) A plain, speedy and efficient remedy may be had in the courts of such State. The Johnson Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1342 (1988). See also Tennyson v. Gas Service Co., 506 F.2d 1135 (10th Cir.1974) (<HOLDING>) By the Johnson Act’s “broad wording it is
holding that 42 usc  1396aa13a is enforceable in a suit under  1983 holding that a state is not a person under 42 usc  1983 holding the johnson act forbade federal court jurisdiction in a class action suit brought under 42 usc  1983 holding no pendent party jurisdiction over nondiverse defendants when underlying suit brought under 42 usc  1983 holding that in actions brought under 42 usc  1983 federal courts apply the states statute of limitation for personal injury