the assailant as Frankie. Reyes was aware of Whipp’s statements and of the calls identifying Frankie, and he also knew that on November 8, an anonymous tipster called the Stockton crime-stoppers, stating that “the guy who killed the kid at Shaker’s is a JUS BROTHER and his name is Frankie.” We agree with the district court that the officers are entitled to qualified immunity in connection with their decision not to release Mark and Heather. Whether or not the officers knew Frankie’s last name, which is disputed, anonymous tips, standing alone, are entitled to little weight. See, e.g., United States v. Luong, 470 F.3d 898, 903 (9th Cir.2006); United States v. Clark, 31 F.3d 831, 834 (9th Cir.1994); see also Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266, 268-69, 120 S.Ct. 1375, 146 L.Ed.2d 254 (2000) (<HOLDING>). No witness who was willing to identify
holding that an anonymous tip that a person is carrying a gun  without any corroborating evidence  did not provide reasonable suspicion of criminal wrongdoing justifying the officers stop and frisk of that person holding that an anonymous tip lacking indicia of reliability that an individual is carrying a gun is not enough to justify a terry stop holding that an anonymous callers barebones tip that a young black male wearing a plaid shirt and standing at a particular bus stop was carrying a gun without more was insufficient to justify an officers stop and frisk of the man holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop holding that an anonymous tip must have sufficient indicia of reliability to justify a stop and frisk