of a judgment reflecting the proper amount of treble damages. On remand, the trial court shall conduct an evidentiary hearing regarding the amount of attorney’s fees to be awarded Rogers. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. GRIFFIN and COHEN, JJ., concur. 1 . Appellants raise the issue that the trial court abused its discretion in striking their pleadings and that there was insufficient evidence to support the award of treble damages under section 772.11. We disagree and affirm as to these issues without further discussion. 2 . The final judgment does not award damages pursuant to count II, apparently because counts I and II are essentially the same, except for the treble damage request under the former. 3 . Compare Snyder v. Bell, 746 So.2d 1096, 1098-99 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>), review granted, 760 So.2d 945 (Fla.2000),
holding that plaintiff could recover both treble damages under state racketeering statute and punitive damages under fraud and breach of fiduciary duty claims because the statute provided that actions brought under it are remedial and not punitive and that civil remedies provided under it are supplemental and not mutually exclusive holding tcpa is remedial statute and that statutory damages are not punitive damages holding that the tcpas treble damages provision is remedial holding that treble damages under the housing and rent act are remedial in nature holding that treble damages awarded under the civil theft statute are remedial not punitive