Chandar Kaur Narang and her son Shantanu Narang, natives and citizens of India, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order affirming pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) without opinion an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Petitioners’ contentions that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate their rights to due process and are void for vagueness are foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. ** This
holding that doctrine does not violate due process holding that the bias streamlining procedure does not violate an aliens due process rights holding that imposition of more severe sentence following trial de novo does violate defendants due process rights holding that the defendant bears the burden of proof and that such a disposition does not violate the due process clause holding that negligent inaction by a jail officer does not violate due process