agency may adopt, reject or modify the ALJ’s findings, the decision of the ALJ will be deemed adopted as the final decision of the agency unless the agency modifies or rejects the report within forty-five days of its receipt. N.J.S.A. 52:14B-10(c). In this proceeding the Merit System Board issued an Order that affirmatively adopted the findings of fact and conclusions of law made by the AL J. Once the agency has issued its final decision, “the Appellate Division’s initial review of that decision is a limited one.” Clowes, supra, 109 N.J. at 587, 538 A.2d 794; see also Brady v. Board of Review, 152 N.J. 197, 210, 704 A.2d 547 (1997) (“The judicial capacity to review administrative agency decisions is limited.”); Goodman v. London Metals Exch., Inc., 86 N.J. 19, 28, 429 A.2d 341 (1981) (<HOLDING>). The scope of review of an administrative
holding that judicial review of an administrative agencys decision is limited solely to whether given the relevant standard and facts the agencys decision was arbitrary illegal capricious or unreasonable holding that ultimate determinations of reasonable suspicion are subject to independent appellate review holding 5 usc  8347c bars review of agencys factual determinations but not questions of law and procedure holding that there is no right to habeas review of administrative evidentiary determinations before a district court where direct review of the administrative proceedings is available in the appellate courts holding that appellate review of an administrative agencys factual determinations is circumscribed