Eleventh Circuit case law provides that controlling weight must be given to the opinion, diagnosis and medical evidence of a treating physician unless there is good cause to do otherwise. Crawford v. Commissioner of Social Security, 363 F.3d 1155, 1159-1160 (11th Cir.2004); Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240-1241 (11th Cir.2004); Lewis v. Callahan, 125 F.3d 1436, 1439-1441 (11th Cir.1997); 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(d)(2). “[G]ood cause exists when the (1) treating physician’s opinion was not bolstered by the evidence; (2) evidence supported a contrary finding; or (3) treating physician’s opinion was eonclusory or inconsistent with the doctor’s own medical records.” Phillips, 357 F.3d at 1240-1241 (citing to Lewis, 125 F.3d at 1440); Edwards v. Sullivan, 937 F.2d 580 (11th Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). When a treating physician’s opinion does not
holding that an alj may discount a treating physicians opinion where the physician has offered inconsistent opinions holding that where the alj had already  obtained and considered reports from treating physicians the alj had before him a complete medical history and the evidence received from the treating physicians was adequate for him to make a determination as to disability holding that the alj properly discounted a treating physicians report where the physician was unsure of the accuracy of his findings and statements holding that remand was not required and that the aljs failure to mention treating physicians opinion was harmless error because the alj adopted the treating physicians recommendations holding that where a treating physicians opinion is contradicted by a consulting physician the alj must explain on the record the reasons for rejecting the opinion of the treating physician