the cause of her symptoms before March, 1995. The only doctor visit of which she has made this Court aware is a February, 1994 visit to a family doctor and Murphy does not claim that she inquired about or discussed her symptoms or possible causes with him, only that she requested a prescription for powder-free latex gloves. This is not a case where the plaintiff repeatedly sought medical advice and multiple doctors were unable to diagnose the problem. See Lindsay v. Romano, 427 Mass. 771, 696 N.E.2d 520 (1998). Instead, Murphy “essentially did nothing to investigate the cause of [her] injury.” Id. at 775, 696 N.E.2d 520 n. 4. Murphy claims that she was not aware of the existence of latex allergies until shortly before Dr. DuBuske gave her the 542 (Mass.Super.Ct. Oct. 23, 2001) (<HOLDING>). In Gray v. Johnson & Johnson, the court
holding that cause of action accrued no later than date plaintiffs physician advised her to switch from vinyl to latex gloves even though physician did not then discuss latex allergy with her holding letter from plaintiffs father a physician to plaintiffs psychiatrist describing her emotional problems was properly admitted as a business record holding victim waived physicianpatient privilege by authorizing her doctor to release her medical records to the department of criminal investigation because the information contained in her medical records was no longer confidential between herself and her physician recognizing physician assistant as agent of the supervising physician holding physician in action based on illegal cavity search to standard of a reasonable physician