1286 (9th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. ** This disposition is not
recognizing the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress holding that act did not bar intentional infliction of emotional distress claim holding that a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was preempted where it was based on the same conduct as a preempted claim for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing holding that a tort claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress is distinct from a claim for emotional distress damages under the employment discrimination statute holding that a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was preempted where it arose out of the same conduct as a preempted contract claim