839, 184 L.Ed.2d 652 (2013) ("Conspiracy actually has two intent elements — intent to further the unlawful purpose and the level of intent required for proving the underlying substantive offense."). 61 . United States v. Gadison, 8 F.3d 186, 192 (5th Cir.1993); United States v. Prati, 861 F.2d 82, 86 (5th Cir.1988). 62 . See United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 912-13 (5th Cir.1978) (“[A]s a predicate to a determination that the extrinsic offense is relevant, the Government must offer proof demonstrating that the defendant committed the offense.”). 63 . Fed.R.Evid. 403. 64 . Beechum, 582 F.2d at 914. 65 . Fed.R.Evid. 404 advisory committee’s note, 1991 amendments; United States v. Blount, 502 F.3d 674, 678 (7th Cir.2007); United States v. Gorman, 312 F.3d 1159, 1163 (10th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>). 66 . Fed.R.Evid. 404 advisory committee’s
holding that verbal notice was sufficient holding that substantial compliance with notice is sufficient holding statement of points in notice of appeal sufficient holding 57 days notice before deadline to file a complaint under  523 was sufficient notice when creditor had actual notice of filing holding that notice of judgment was insufficient