Discrimination Claim under Title VII and TCHRA Ketera contends that it is entitled to summary judgment on Hobbs’s discrimination claim because Hobbs cannot establish a prima facie case of discrimination and she has not come forward with evidence to rebut Ketera’s evidence regarding pretext. Ketera acknowledges in its motion that Hobbs has asserted a discrimi nation claim under Title VII and the TCHRA but does not differentiate between them in its analysis. Because the court determines the same standard applies to discrimination claims under Title VII and the TCHRA, it considers Hobbs’s discrimination claims under Title VII and the TCHRA together based on the standard applicable to Title VII claims. See Shackelford v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 190 F.3d 398, 404 n. 2 (5th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). 1. Legal Standard for Title VII
holding that there is no individual liability under title vii holding claims based on title vii subject to arbitration holding that law governing claims under the tchra texas labor code  21001 et seq and title vii is identical holding that a title vii plaintiff could not hold coworkers liable in their individual capacities under title vii holding that such a theory is viable under title vii