contract or lease, not under other, substantially unrelated agreements. This principle applies where distinct agreements are set out in the same document. And, of particular relevance here, it applies where distinct agreements are linked by a cross-default clause, providing for a loss of rights under one agreement if another agreement is breached. Thus, as noted in In re Convenience USA, Inc., No. 01-81478, 2002 WL 230772, at *2 (Bankr.M.D.N.C. Feb.12, 2002), assumption under § 365 is subject to a “well-established” cross-default rule: “[C]ross-default provisions do not integrate executory contracts or unexpired leases that otherwise are separate or severable.” United Air Lines, Inc. v. U.S. Bank Trust Nat’l Ass’n ng-Pittsburgh Steel Corp., 54 B.R. 772, 779 (Bankr.W.D.Pa.1985) (<HOLDING>), aff'd 67 B.R. 620 (W.D.Pa.1986); In re
recognizing that the employers principal production activity was the creation of insurance policies holding that crossdefault provisions in insurance policies were unenforceable because they would impermissibly restrict the debtors ability to assume some of the policies and reject others holding claims for negligent procurement of insurance accrued on date the insured purchased the insurance policies recognizing comity as a golden rule among nations  that each must give the respect to the laws policies and interests of others that it would have others give to its own in the same or similar circumstances holding that subcontractors primary and excess insurance policies must pay first and before contractors own insurance