offense. Additionally, while Boner points out that he originally had been placed on work release, he tested positive for cannabis and methamphetamine during that period. Appellant's App. p. 29. Specifically, Boner admitted at the sentencing hearing that he purchased marijuana and methamphetamine from Hardiman two days before the trial commenced. Appellant's App. p. 178-79. In light of these circumstances, it was reasonable for the trial court to conclude that Boner should not be permitted to continue with work release and, instead, face a stricter penalty. Tr. p. 166, 185-86. Finally, while the trial court considered the effect of Boner's incarceration on his children, it was not required to find this a significant mitigator. See Dowdell v. State, 720 NE.2d 1146, 1154 (Ind.1999) (<HOLDING>). Turning to the aggravating factors found by
recognizing that absent special cireumstances trial courts are not required to find that imprisonment will result in an undue hardship where the defendant has one or more children holding that more than notice to a defendant is required holding that a trial courts weighing of mitigating and aggravating factors will not be disturbed absent a showing that the trial court abused its discretion holding that a trial courts order in a probationrevocation proceeding will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of discretion holding that when plaintiffs argue an inconsistent jury verdict this court will not disturb the trial courts denial of a motion for a new trial absent a showing of abuse of discretion