and franchises are licenses to use such property. Thus, under [state] law, these franchises are interest in property, and as such are property of the estate under section 541. They are also covered by section 363, although the procedure for their transfer is delineated by section 365. Therefore, section 363(m) governs the sale of the franchises here, notwithstanding that section 365 applies to the particular mechanics of the conveyance. 141 F.3d at 498. Regal Ware acknowledges that Krebs and a line of cases following it have applied Section 363(m) to transactions labeled as “sales” of executo-ry contracts even though those contracts have been assumed and assigned under Section 365. See e.g., L.R.S.C. Co. v. Rickel Home Ctrs., Inc. (In re Rickel Home Ctrs.), 209 F.3d 291 (3d Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). Regal Ware also acknowledges that Krebs
holding that funds held in escrow are property of the estate only to the extent of the debtors independent right to that property holding that the payment of a settlement from estate funds is not within the ordinary course under  363b holding that the debtors interest in a broadcasting license constitutes property of the estate holding that like executory contracts leases constituted property of the debtors estate and could be sold pursuant to sections 363b and 363m holding that payments to debtors counsel from a whollyowned subsidiary constituted property of the estate