the general rule that repeal of a statute moots a case, and that Aladdin’s Castle and Northeastern Florida created an exception to this rale that only applied "when there is a reasonable expectation that the challenged conduct will be repeated following dismissal of the case”); Nat'l Black Police Assoc. v. Dist. of Columbia, 108 F.3d 346, 349 (D.C.Cir.1997) ("Although voluntary cessation analysis applies where a challenge to government action is mooted by passage of legislation, the mere power to reenact a challenged law is not a sufficient basis on which a court can conclude that a reasonable expectation of recurrence exists. Rather, there must be evidence indicating that the challenged law likely will be reenacted.”); Ky. Right to Life, Inc. v. Terry, 108 F.3d 637, 645 (6th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Native Village of Noatak v. Blatchford, 38
holding that a states governor and attorney general were not proper defendants when they had no power to enforce the challenged statute holding that a statutes expiration mooted any challenge to the statute holding that amendment to the challenged statute mooted the claim when the state had expressed no intention to reenact the prior law holding that the burden is on the defendant when the validity of the warrant is challenged holding state of the law must be determined at time of challenged action