for a motion for summary judgment. 3 . We have been provided with only a partial transcript in the record, and therefore, it is not clear how the matter became apparent to Parkinson's counsel. 4 . The jury returned a verdict for $18,300. However, the judgment was entered for $18,200. There is no explanation in the record for the discrepancy. 5 . This issue is presented for review l.Rptr. 702, 706 (1977) (ruling that to recover damages for tort, plaintiff raust prove dental charges were reasonable and required as result of tort); Lawson v. Safeway, Inc., 878 P.2d 127, 131 (Colo.Ct.App.1994) (noting that correct measure of compensable damages for medical expenses is necessary and reasonable value of services rendered); Garreff v. Morris Kirschman & Co., 336 So.2d 566, 571 (Fla.1976) (<HOLDING>); Zack's Props., Inc. v. Gafford, 241 Ga.App.
holding that medical expenses must be proven to be both reasonable and necessary holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence holding that jury should decide whether plaintiffs testimony proved reasonable and necessary medical expenses holding that jury has responsibility to determine whether repair bills represent necessary and reasonable expenses holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid