as such without a toner cartridge. Hence, the cartridges function as an integral part under Willoughby Camera. It is also undisputed that the toner cartridges were dedicated solely for use with Mita photocopiers. Thus, the toner cartridges also meet the Pompeo standard. Therefore, the Court concludes that under the standards set forth in Bauerhin Tech., the toner cartridges are properly considered parts under the HTSUS. See also Mattel, Inc. v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 75, 82 n. 5, 287 F.Supp. 999, 1004 n. 5 (1968) (“[I]t is of course obvious that if an item is dedicated solely for use on a particular article and is essential to the functioning of that article, it is a fortiori a ‘part’ of that article.”); Bruce Duncan Co. v. United States, 63 Cust. Ct. 412, 1969 WL 13830 (1969) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, lexicographic and scientific
holding that engine parts later used to make engines were properly classified as parts holding that apprendi was not triggered because the defendants were sentenced to terms of imprisonment that were within the maximum penalties for the rico offenses that they were found guilty of committing holding that a variable annuity is properly classified as a security holding that for purposes of gri 2a essential character analysis incomplete merchandise as imported does not have the essential character of the complete or finished article  the ability to strain salt from water and thus cannot be classified as straining cloth holding that imported butane cartridges were properly classified as parts of cigarette lighters because these speciallydesigned cartridges were necessary for the operation of the lighter