may not avoid under this section a transfer— (2) to the extent that such transfer was in payment of a debt incurred by the debtor in the ordinary course of business or financial affairs of the debtor and the transferee, and such transfer was— (A) made in the ordinary course of business or financial affairs of the debtor and the transferee; or (B) made according to ordinary business terms; 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(2). 31 . 11 U.S.C. LC (In re Radnor Holdings Corp.), Case No. 06-10894, 2009 WL 2004226, *5, 2009 Bankr.LEXIS 1815, *14 (Bankr.D.Del. July 9, 2009) 47 . Id., 2009 WL 2004226, *5-6, 2009 Bankr.LEXIS 1815 at *14-15; Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc. v. Fabricon Products, Inc. (In re Ice Cream Liquidation, Inc.), Adv. Pro. No. 03-3175, 2005 WL 976935, 2005 Bankr.LEXIS 704 (Bankr.D.Conn.2005) (<HOLDING>); Huffman v. New Jersey Steel Corp. (In re
holding that a five day discrepancy between average days outstanding during the prepreference period versus during the preference period did not make the payments out of the ordinary course of business holding that payments made 25 days after the average were within the ordinary course of dealings but payments made 50 days after the average were not holding that a difference between 384 days prepreference average number of days to payment and 547 days preference average number of days to payment did not make the payments out of the ordinary course of business holding that the average number of days to payment nearly doubled between the historical period and the preference period which based on the facts of that particular case made the payments outside the ordinary course of dealings between the plaintiff and defendant holding that a difference between approximately 54 days prepreference average days to payment and approximately 67 days preference average days to payment did not make the payments out of the ordinary course of business