juvenile system prior to trial pursuant to Section 6322(a). These factors are listed in Section 6355(a)(4)(iii)(A) and address the issue of when a defendant is amenable to the juvenile system. The Juvenile Act also provides that in determining whether a juvenile’s case should be transferred from juvenile court for a criminal proceeding, the factors set forth in Section 6355(a)(4)(iii)(A) are to be applied. Applying the rules of statutory construction found in the Statutory Construction Act, we find that it was the legislature’s intent that the trial court would also utilize the factors set forth in Section 6355(a)(4)(iii)(A) in determining whether a juvenile is amenable to the juvenile system prior to sentencing. See In re Pittsburgh Beer Corp., 216 Pa.Super. 71, 260 A.2d 493 (1969) (<HOLDING>). To hold otherwise would render tiie Juvenile
holding that when a statutes terms are clear and unambiguous on their face there is no room for statutory construction and a court must apply the statute according to its literal meaning holding that the term shall is mandatory for purposes of statutory construction when the statute is unambiguous holding that a courts prior judicial construction of a statute trumps an agency construction otherwise entitled to chevron deference only if the prior court decision holds that its construction follows from the unambiguous terms of the statute and thus leaves no room for agency discretion recognizing that in the absence of a statutory definition statutory terms are construed in accordance with their ordinary or natural meaning holding that statutory construction act applies when statute does not define meaning of key terms