within North Carolina. Plaintiff offers nothing more than conclusory allegations that Dr. Trojanowski purposely directed any of the factual information he posted on the web sites toward North Carolina. In any event, the purely informative informational web site and forums in which Dr. Trojanowski posts information cannot alone serve as the basis for asserting personal jurisdiction over him. See Carefirst of Md., Inc. v. Carefirst Pregnancy Ctrs., Inc., 334 F.3d 390, 399 (4th Cir.2003) (noting that “a person’s action of placing information on the Internet is not sufficient by itself to subject that person to personal jurisdiction in each State in which the information is accessed”) (internal quotations omitted); Panavision Int'l, L.P. v. Toeppen, 141 F.3d 1316, 1321 (9th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>); Accu-Sport Int’l, Inc. v. Swing Dynamics,
holding that a defendants agreement that a substantial performance of contractual duties take place in the forum state is dispositive on whether defendant purposefully availed itself of that forum holding that the defendant must have created a substantial connection to the forum state by action purposefully directed toward the forum state or otherwise invoking the benefits and protections of the laws of the state holding that something more than posting and accessibility is needed to indicate that the defendant purposefully albeit electronically directed his activity in a substantial way to the forum state holding that probable cause is something more than mere suspicion holding something more than denial of receipt is required