in announcing its decision explicitly discussed accomplice liability and specifically referenced Utah Code section 76-2-202 entitled, "Criminal responsibility for direct commission of offense or for conduct of another," see Utah Code Ann. § 76-2-202 (2008). 10 . Although a party is not required to file a postjudgment motion before the trial court as a prerequisite to filing an appeal, see Sittner v. Schriever, 2000 UT 45, ¶¶ 15-16, 2 P.3d 442, nor does reference to the issue in such a filing necessarily preserve the point for appeal, see LeBaron & Assocs., Inc. v. Rebel Enters., Inc., 823 P.2d 479, 484 (Utah Ct.App.1991), raising the issue after disposition would have afforded the juvenile court an opportunity to address the issue. Cf. State v. Belgard, 830 P.2d 264, 265-66 (Utah 1992) (<HOLDING>). 11 . I agree with the concurring opinion that
holding that issues raised and dealt with in posttrial evidentiary hearings may be preserved for appeal holding that issues must be raised and ruled upon in the trial court to be preserved for appellate review holding issues not raised before the district court are not preserved for appeal holding that issues not raised in the trial court may not be raised later on appeal holding that issues must be briefed to be preserved on appeal