specific factual allegations sufficient to save the Plaintiffs’ Complaint from dismissal.”); see also Zbitnoff v. NationStar Mortg. LLC, No. C 13-05221(WHA), 2014 WL 2119875, at *4 (N.D.Cal. May 21, 2014). The Court further notes that, in their opposition to the motion to dismiss, the Plaintiffs fail to address the Defendants’ arguments in support of those parts of their motions to dismiss the claims for fraud in the inducement; fraudulent concealment; intentional infliction of emotional distress; violations of TILA, HOEPA, and RESPA; and rescission. “[A]rgu-ments not made in opposition to a motion for summary judgment are deemed abandoned.” Plahutnik v. Daikin Am., Inc., 912 F.Supp.2d 96, 104 (S.D.N.Y.2012); see Jain v. McGraw-Hill Cos., Inc., 827 F.Supp.2d 272, 280 (S.D.N.Y.2011) (<HOLDING>); Senno v. Elmsford, Union Free Sch. Dist., 812
holding that petitioners had abandoned arguments not raised below holding that the plaintiff abandoned six claims when her opposition papers failed to respond to defendants arguments on those claims holding that arguments not briefed are abandoned holding that the appellant had waived claims raised on appeal because his opening brief contained no substantive arguments pertaining to those claims and the court would not permit him to incorporate the arguments set forth in his filings with the district court holding the petitioner abandoned her cat claim when she failed to raise it in her initial appellate brief