the bag. He separated appellants and advised each of them of the reason for the stop and of their “Miranda rights.” He did not then handcuff appellants or advise them that they were under arrest. As Herderich completed his search for weapons, Sergeant Puls arrived and took charge of the investigation. Herderich advised him of the bank bag located under the front seat. Puls then obtained consent from Pogliano to search the automobile. Puls searched the front passenger compartment of the automobile and found and seized a tubular lockpick from the center of the front seat. Both appellants were then advised that they were under arrest, and they were handcuffed. Puls continued the search of the automobile and seized a blue notebook (containing some type of numeri cal code), a paper cup (<HOLDING>), and the bank bag with contents from under the
holding that a prior state judgment of conviction for burglary was ambiguous because it encompassed some conduct which constituted a crime of violence and some which did not holding several rolls of coins and some loose coins holding that several coercive statements made in combination required reversal holding that delay of several hours after the vehicle was seized was reasonable holding that one agreement cannot be taken to be several agreements and therefore several conspiracies because the agreement envisages the violation of several statutes rather than one