provider.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1). The statute further provides, “No cause of action may be brought and no liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section.” § 230(e)(3). An “interactive computer service” is defined as “any information service, system, or access software provider that provides or enables computer access by multiple users to a computer server, including specifically a service or system that provides access to the Internet and such systems operated or services offered by libraries or educational institutions.” § 230(f)(2). Defendants, like Purdy, who run web sites on which internet users can post comments, are providers of interactive computer services. See, e.g., Donato v. Moldow, 374 N.J.Super. 475, 865 A.2d 711, 713 (2005) (<HOLDING>); Schneider v. Amazon.com, Inc., 108 Wash.App.
recognizing that a judge is not absolutely immune from criminal liability holding that a city could not be held vicariously liable for the act of a magistrate who was immune from liability holding that a railroad operated and owned by the federal government was immune from antitrust liability holding that under the communications decency act operator of an electronic community bulletin board website was immune from liability for allegedly actionable messages posted anonymously by others holding that the government is immune from liability for its choice of traffic protection devices