of nicotine addiction was common knowledge when Grinnell began smoking. Addiction is a danger apart from the direct physical dangers of smoking because the addictive nature of cigarettes multiplies the likelihood of and contributes to the smoker’s ultimate injury, in Grinnell’s ease, lung cancer. See Gamer, Cigarette Dependency and Civil Liability: A Modest Proposal, 53 S. Cal. L.Rev. 1423, 1430 (1980) (“[Dependency adds a new dimension to smoking, for it greatly increases the likelihood of high volume, long term use which leads to disease, disability, and early death.”). This Court has also recognized the seriousness of addiction and the need for manufacturers to warn of this danger in the context of prescription drugs. Crocker v. Winthrop Labs., 514 S.W.2d 429, 432-33 (Tex.1974) (<HOLDING>); see also Carlisle v. Philip Morris, Inc., 805
holding prior drug deals admissible to prove knowledge of the drug trade holding drug manufacturer liable under restatement second of torts  402b for misrepresenting that drug was free and safe from all dangers of addiction recognizing under alabama law that drugs manufacturer owed duty to warn about potential dangers of using prescription drug for an offlabel to patients prescribing physician by drugs manufacturer holding 12year statute of limitations violated state guarantee of open courts when it would have barred right of actions against manufacturer of drug before they ever existed as it was not discovered until 20 years after drug was administered that the drug caused cancer holding joinder of a hospital medical malpractice claim and a drug manufacturer products liability theory was proper in claim alleging injury from administering a drug