and severally liable for the entire arbitration award in contravention of the arbitrator’s finding that Broemer was not personally liable for $15,637 of the award. We agree. An arbitration award has the same effect as the judgment of a court of last resort, and a court reviewing the award may not substitute its judgment for that of the arbitrator merely because it would have reached a different result. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc. v. Hennig Prod. Co., 164 S.W.3d 438, 442 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2005, no pet.). Under the terms of the FAA, an arbitration award must be confirmed unless it is vacated, modified, or corrected under one of the limited grounds set forth in sections 10 and 11 of the FAA. 9 U.S.C. §§ 9- 3d 459, 465 (TexApp.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>); Monday v. Cox, 881 S.W.2d 381, 384-85
holding merely that the evidence was sufficient to support the award of attorneys fees holding trial court had no authority to award attorneys fees when arbitrator had stated he would not award attorneys fees holding that an award of attorneys fees under supreme court rule 38 precursor to rule 222 did not preempt an award of attorneys fees to which one is otherwise entitled and thus appellant could seek an award of attorneys fees pursuant to section 1577300 which permits an award of fees for a party prevailing in an action against a state agency holding that an attorneys fees award is not appealable until the amount of the award is set holding that a district court may award attorneys fees while the merits are on appeal