the surveillance camera at issue on appeal was aimed only at the Currys’ front yard, the Currys’ driveway, and the corner of the Currys’ garage — all exterior areas. These outside areas can be observed by anyone passing by or living near the Cur-rys’ house. The cameras were neither aimed at nor did they capture the inside of the Currys’ home. A defendant may be liable for intrusion into private affairs if he or she has engaged in conduct that resembles watching, spying, prying, besetting, or overhearing, and the intrusion has invaded an area which one normally expects will be free from exposure to the defendant. 62A Am.Jur.2d, supra § 44. An example of an actionable intrusion upon seclusion includes peering into the windows of a private home. Id.; see also Creel, 771 N.E.2d at 1281 (<HOLDING>); Cullison, 570 N.E.2d at 31 (concluding that
holding that the public use exception was not applicable because the injury to the tenants employee occurred in an area of the leased premises that was not open to the public but was used only by employees holding that members of a church congregation lacked sufficient interest to support intervention in an action by the church itself challenging the designation of the church as a landmark holding that investigator who covertly videotaped plaintiff playing the piano during a church service attended by over 140 people which was open to the general public and at which no signs were posted indicating that videotaping was prohibited did not violate plaintiffs physical solitude and seclusion because it simply captured activity that was open to the public observed by many and which the investigator or any other of the church attendees could have testified to witnessing at trial moreover it is undisputed that the investigator confined his videotaped surveillance to areas of the church that were open to the public holding that a road not open to the public at all times was not a highway holding the federal unemployment tax act section exempting service performed in employ of church after which florida molded its unemployment law was meant to apply to schools that have no separate legal existence from the church and therefore employees working within such schools are in employ of the church