in the years noted, and that this practice was reasonably foreseeable as to each Defendant: Allure -1991; ESPN The Magazine — 1998; GQ-Gentlemen’s Quarterly — 1957; Maxim — 1997. Id. Accordingly, Defendants caused the Racketeering Acts by publishing press releases and advertisements in the listed newspapers or magazines. Moreover, when a Defendant sends press releases and advertisements to newspapers and magazines for dissemination, it is obviously reasonably f th Cir.1978); United States v. Buchanan, 544 F.2d 1322, 1324-25 (5th Cir.1977); Pritchard v. United States, 386 F.2d 760, 764 (8th Cir.1967) (same for advertisements in magazines as well as newspapers); Atkinson v. United States, 344 F.2d 97, 98-99 (8th Cir.1965) (same for advertisements in newspapers); Weisman, 83 F.2d at 473 (<HOLDING>). For the foregoing reasons, it is clear beyond
holding that the board of education violated a school teachers first amendment rights by dismissing him because he had criticized the board in a letter to the local newspaper holding that injunction of scandalous newspaper was unconstitutional holding that it was reasonably foreseeable that newspapers would be mailed to some subscribers containing the advertisements the defendant placed in the newspaper holding that it was reasonably foreseeable to the defendant that the letter he handdelivered to a newspaper in response to an advertisement would be sent by the newspaper to its customer via the us mails holding that murder committed by customer was not foreseeable result of excessive sale of alcohol to customer