bond for title, and, therefore, that he can sue Elaty and Guiee for breach of contract. We agree with Elaty and Guiee. It is undisputed that the mortgage company had priority over the Whatleys’ mortgage and the bond of title. It is also undisputed that Cameron never exercised his right to redeem the property pursuant to Ala.Code 1975, § 6-5-248. “If foreclosure of a valid mortgage is properly conducted, all interests arising after the time the senior mortgage was created and all subordinate interests will be cut off unless the junior lienors redeem during the specified time period provided by statute.” Bailey Mortgage Co. v. Gobble-Fite Lumber Co., 565 So.2d 138, 144 (Ala.1990). See Dewitt Apparel, Inc. v. Four Seasons of Romar Beach Condominium Owners’ Ass’n, 678 So.2d 740 (Ala.1996) (<HOLDING>); and Mid-State Homes, Inc. v. Butler, 287 Ala.
holding that a mortgage or modification of a mortgage is not a good or a service under the dtpa holding that the note and the mortgage must coexist to give the mortgage validity holding that foreclosure of a prior mortgage extinguished a declaration of condominium and interests in a parking lot that were subject to the mortgage holding that foreclosure of prior mortgage extinguished second mortgage holding that despite foreclosure judgment providing that the holder of a junior mortgage had no interest in or lien on or claim to said premises the lack of foreclosure sale meant that the junior mortgage was not extinguished