or related to the management of the environment or which have an impact on the quality of the environment.” Id. at 8. Section 102(1) of NEPA commands that “the policies, regulations, and public laws of the United States shall be interpreted and administered in accordance with the policies set forth in [this Act].” 42 U.S.C. § 4332(1). NEPA includes a range of “action forcing procedures that require that agencies take a hard look at [the] environmental consequences” of a proposed project. Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council, 490 U.S. 332, 350, 109 S.Ct. 1835, 104 L.Ed.2d 351 (1989) (internal quotation marks omitted). NEPA does not mandate a particular outcome, but rather describes the process necessary to reach an informed decision. Robertson, 490 U.S. at 351, 109 S.Ct. 1835 (<HOLDING>). However, proper compliance with procedures
holding that prior convictions are merely sentencing enhancements rather than elements of the offense recognizing that nepa merely prohibits uninformed  rather than unwise agency action holding that nsf must comply with procedural requirements of nepa when considering incineration of food waste in antarctica because 1 the presumption against extraterritoriality does not apply because nepa is designed to regulate conduct occurring within the territory of the united states 2 the united states exercises legislative control over antarctica 3 any concerns about nepa interference with foreign policy were overstated because when foreign policy interests outweighed benefits of nepa compliance nepas requirements must yield and 4 broad language of the statute supports broad application of nepa requirements holding that an agency may only tier to documents subject to nepa review and citing cases holding that birdwatchers interest in preventing adverse environmental effects from agency action fell squarely within the zone of interests of nepa