under the Pledge, the actions of Majestic, and the handling and administration of the Plan, would be affected. We have often said that a debtor corporation has no property interest in the shares of its stock owned by shareholders. Paso Del Norte, 755 F.2d at 424. However, at the point the shares were issued but undelivered to Templeton, Majestic had possession of the stock, and delivery was necessary to administer the estate pursuant to the Plan (the partial satisfaction of Templeton’s unsecured claim). Whether the undelivered stock was property of the estate is not a critical inquiry, since the Bankruptcy Act of 1978 eliminated § 711 of the Bankruptcy Act of 1898, which had limited bankruptcy jurisdiction solely to the debtor and his property. Compare Paso Del Norte, 755 F.2d at 424 (<HOLDING>) with Pacor, 743 F.2d at 994 (stating, under
holding that designation is neither a sentence nor a punishment holding that dna act violates neither substantive nor procedural due process under the fifth amendment holding under the 1898 act that neither the debtor nor its property was involved in stock ownership dispute holding that neither the ada nor the rehabilitation act applies to prison employment holding there was no assumption where neither the bankruptcy court nor the debtor exhibited any intention of assuming the contract