Nat’l Bank of El Paso v. Farah Mfg. Co., Inc., 678 S.W.2d 661, 681 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1984, writ dism’d by agr.), called into question on other grounds, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sturges, 52 S.W.3d 711, 724 (Tex.2001). 17 . In Paragraph 57 of the Counterclaims, Tenant-Base also made allegations regarding a dispute between Hillwood and entities referred to as Radical Cuban and Radical Arena regarding profit distributions made by Landlord-Center to Radical Arena and a subsequent lawsuit filed by Hillwood against Radical Cuban and others and that "Center had knowledge of the Radical Cuban-Hillwood feud.” Moreover, in Paragraph 58, Tenant-Base alleges that “Center knew that the feud between Hillwood and Radical Cuban would ., No. CIV H-02-0098, 2005 WL 3371875, at *6 (S.D.Tex. Dec. 12, 2005) (<HOLDING>); McCarthy v. Wani Venture, A.S., 251 S.W.3d
holding no jurisdiction over nonresident customer where contract was solicited negotiated and consummated in oklahoma for billboards to be built in texas and erected in oklahoma payments were made to texas and defendant would not earn a profit from texas and had no other contact with texas holding that appellant failed to establish abuse of discretion in dismissal of texas suit in which appellant failed to show georgia would refuse to apply texas law recognizing validity under texas law of stringalong fraud where defendant failed to disclose defective condition of software to induce plaintiff to install and use the newest software version and thus to remain defendants customer holding under pre1990 version of  4406f that it precluded the customer from asserting that certain checks were forged because the customer failed to discover the forgeries and notify the bank timely holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied