of, a case under this title; (D) whether the services were performed within a reasonable amount of time commensurate with the complexity, importance, and nature of the problem, issue, or task addressed; (E) with respect to a professional person, whether the person is board certified or otherwise has demonstrated skill and experience in the bankruptcy field; and (F) whether the compensation is reasonable based on the customary compensation charged by comparably skilled practitioners in cases other than cases under this title. 27 . See United States Trustee Guidelines for Reviewing Applications for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed Under 11 U.S.C. § 330. 28 . See In re Cahill, 428 F.3d 536, 539-40 (5th Cir.2005) (citing In re Fender, 12 F.3d 480, 487 (5th Cir.1994)) (<HOLDING>); First Colonial Corp. of Am., 544 F.2d 1291
holding that all fifth circuit cases decided before the close of business on september 30 1981 are binding on the eleventh circuit holding that the lodestar method of calculating fees builds on the johnson factors and is traditionally used by the fifth circuit holding that both the lodestar and the percentage of the fund methods are permitted holding that the bureau of prisonss method for calculating good time credits was a reasonable interpretation of the statute in part because the plaintiffs contrary method would result in a windfall to prisoners that congress did not intend holding that because counsels lumping of fees was not considered in  calculating the revised lodestar amount it could serve as a basis for adjusting the fee award