officers in criminal matters is limited by certain factors, including the boundaries of the reservation and whether the offender is a non-Indian. Because it is settled law that the Indian tribes may not assert criminal jurisdiction over a non-Indian for a misdemeanor crime committed on the reservation, a fortiori, the Indian tribes may not do so outside the reservation. We therefore conclude that given the facts that Young was a non-Indian purportedly arrested for driving under the influence on a roadway outside the reservation and Goldsberry was a tribal officer outside the territorial boundaries of his jurisdiction when he “arrested” Young for misdemeanor drunk driving, Goldsberry did not have the authority to make such arrest. See State v. Cuny, 257 Neb. 168, 595 N.W.2d 899 (1999) (<HOLDING>). In the instant case, Young was not “validly
holding that tribal officers from pine ridge indian reservation located in south dakota had no common law or statutory authority in nebraska to arrest misdemeanant drunk driver in nebraska holding that state of south dakota does not have criminal jurisdiction over indians in indian country holding that county law enforcement officers lacked jurisdiction to arrest indian at ballpark located on indian trust land holding that the state has no jurisdiction to pursue an indian onto an indian reservation for criminal offenses committed off the reservation holding that the arrest of an indian on indian land was illegal because the state had no jurisdiction over the reservation to enforce its laws  including the execution of a search warrant  unless congress consented to the states jurisdiction