like their situation helped.” 12 . The requirement of subsection (d) of section 574.034 that there be evidence of a confirming recent overt act or continuing pattern of behavior does not conflict with the provision in subsection (f) in that same section that provides that a court may make its findings solely from medical certificates if the proposed patient and his attorney file waivers of the right to cross-examine witnesses. See Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 574.034(d), (f) (Vernon 2003). Subsection (d) deals with the substance of the evidence that must be provided to the court in order to make the evidence clear and convincing, while subsect V, 2008 WL 1839031 at *3, *7, *8 (Tex.App.-Texarkana April 25, 2008, no pet.) (memo op.) (noting Tex.App.-Fort Worth 1990, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). 15 . Dr. Stone testified that K.E.W. was
holding trial court could have considered mothers desire to hurt herself and her history of noncompliance with her medication schedule as factors endangering child holding that complaining witness was an accomplice as a matter of law despite her testimony that i didnt consent to it  when i had intercourse with my father i tried to get away but i couldnt do it i tried to get loose from him  i tried to get up and hit him but that didnt do no good he was so much stouter than i was was insufficient to establish that she was not an accomplice holding that evidence that patient who had a history of not taking medication and who murdered husband during a period when she was off of her medication and delusional tends to confirm the likelihood of serious harm to patient or others holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex holding evidence insufficient when record contained expert testimony but no real evidence that proposed patient ever tried to hurt herself or others or that her condition was deteriorating to point where she might do so