. See, e.g., Bacon, 411 S.W.3d at 173 (quoting IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d at 854 (quoting Tex. Gov’t Code § 311.034; University of Tex. Med. Branch v. York, 871 S.W.2d 175, 177 (Tex. 1994))). 51 . See Mission Consol., Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Garcia, 253 S.W.3d 653, 655 (Tex. 2008); see also Taylor, 106 S.W.3d at 697 ("[W]hen construing a statute that purportedly waives sovereign immunity, we generally resolve ambi- guides by retaining immunity.” (citations omitted)). 52 . See, e.g., State v. Shumake, 199 S.W.3d 279, 284 (Tex. 2006) (citing In re Forlenza, 140 S.W.3d 373, 376 (Tex. 2004)). 53 . See Texas Educ. Agency v. Leeper, 893 S.W.2d 432, 446 (Tex. 1994) (citing Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 37.009). 54 . See Tex. Loc. Gov’t Code § 252.061; see also Carowest Land, Ltd., 432 S.W.3d at 532-33 (<HOLDING>). In their live petition, Plaintiffs also
holding city waives immunity by entering into contract recognizing that immunity may be waived holding that a party waives an argument that it raises in the background section of its brief but not in the argument section recognizing that udja waives sovereign immunity in suit challenging validity of statute recognizing that section 252061 waives immunity