to 35-215 (Cum. Supp. 1982), the firefighter pension statutes as they existed prior to January 1, 1984. Those statutes provided for firefighters’ retirement before the current law. Neb. Rev. Stat. § 35-201(5) (Cum. Supp. 1982) stated: “[S]alary shall mean the base rate of pay, excluding overtime, callback pay, clothing allowances, and other such benefits,” and thus, salary was defined the same under the old law as it is under the new. In Hill v. City of Lincoln, 213 Neb. 517, 330 N.W.2d 471 (1983), the Nebraska Supreme Court found that the words “salary” and “regular pay” are not ambiguous words. It found 757 (Minn. App. 1989); Smerek v. Christiansen, 111 Misc. 2d 580, 444 N.Y.S.2d 860 (1981); York Paid Firemens Pension Fund Bd. v. Orendorff, 53 Pa. Commw. 629, 419 A.2d 232 (1980) (<HOLDING>). In none of the cases reviewed has a court
holding that salary is unconstitutionally withheld if on the basis of protected activities holding that pslra barred rico claims based on pension fund scheme involving failure to disclose conflicts of interest and commission arrangements recognizing that payments to secured creditors are only required in equal monthly amounts if property to be distributed  is in the form of periodic payments holding that if a fireman contributed to a pension fund on the basis of his salary plus longevity payments he would be entitled to pension payments computed on the same basis holding that the lower court failed to account for payments made in connection with the marital home including mortgage payments