and belief, that Waste Material that contained a hazardous substance and that was owned or possessed by [Columbia], which was the owner of a Plant that GACCC later owned, was disposed of or treated at the Landfill.... ” Rule 36(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that “[a]ny matter admitted under this rule is conclusively established unless the court on motion permits withdrawal or amendment of the admission.” GACCC has not sought such relief here. Accordingly, regardless of GACCC’s current effort to qualify its response to the Notice to Admit as somehow less than binding, the Court gives weight to GACCC’s prior admission, despite the fact that it was made on information and belief. See Lipton Indus., Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 670 F.2d 1024, 1030 (C.C.P.A.1982) (<HOLDING>). Further, the EPA Record of Decision for OU-I
holding that defendants statement in defendants brief that a case upon which it was relying was pending on appeal was a judicial admission of that fact holding that the test for good faith is the actual belief of the party and not the reasonableness of that belief holding that it was an abuse of discretion to admit the record when an admission was available holding that admission contained in an answer was binding despite the fact that it was made on information and belief holding that payment made in reasonable belief that it was required by an insurance contract was involuntary