show that “a reasonable person in the alien’s circumstances would fear persecution if returned to [China].” Zubeda v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 463, 469 (3d Cir.2003). “ ‘A person who has a well founded fear that he or she will be forced to abort a pregnancy or undergo involuntary sterili zation or is subject to persecution for failure, refusal, or resistance to undergo such a procedure shall be deemed to have a well founded fear of persecution on account of political opinion.’” Zheng v. Att’y Gen., 549 F.3d 260, 266 (3d Cir.2008) (alterations omitted) (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(42)(B)). The BIA agreed with the IJ’s analysis and found that the birth of petitioners’ two children does not warrant asylum, citing both this Court’s decision in Yu v. Att’y Gen., 513 F.3d 346, 349 (3d Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>), and its own decision in Matter of J-W-S- 24
holding that an applicants fear was not objectively reasonable because it lacked solid support in the record and was merely speculative at best holding substantial evidence supported jury finding of abuse of process holding that a plaintiff must show his belief was objectively reasonable in light of the facts and record presented holding that no wellfounded fear was established where the attacks on family members failed to show a pattern of persecution tied to the petitioners holding that substantial evidence supported determination that petitioners failed to show that fear of sterilization was objectively reasonable