cases. If the Debtors cannot do so, the Court will grant the Movants relief from the stay as to the Bowdon and Ocala Premises following a further hearing to be held in these cases on the basis that the Bowdon and Ocala Premises are not necessary for an effective reorganization. The Court will also exercise its discretion to condition the continuation of the automatic stay with regard to the Bowdon and Ocala Premises on the Debtors’ setting aside an amount sufficient to account for the likelihood that, regardless of what the State Court decides, the Debtors will owe to some entity administrative rent for the post-petition use of the Bowdon and Ocala Premises. See 11 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1)(A); see also In re Greenfield Dry Cleaning & Laundry, Inc., 249 B.R. 634, 644-45 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.2000) (<HOLDING>); In re Hawker Beechcraft, Inc., 483 B.R. 424,
holding that a debt is not entitled to priority simply because the right to payment arises after the debtor in possession has begun managing the estate holding that interest on postpetition taxes incurred by the debtor during chapter 11 reorganization is an administrative expense holding an action for postpetition breach of an agreement to purchase property to be a core proceeding holding that licensor was entitled to administrative expense priority claim where debtor remained in possession postpetition of real property under a license agreement holding that a postpetition claim under section 1305 is a liability that arises postpetition and relates only to postpetition activity