Following a hearing on June 23,1997, the children’s court issued an order granting the motion to suppress. The order stated, in part, that “the affidavit for search warrant is defective [because] it fails to set forth both a substantial basis for believing the informantfs] and a substantial basis for concluding the informants gathered the information of alleged illegal activities in a reliable fashion.” DISCUSSION {6} Did the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant, which was based primarily on information provided by undisclosed informants, set forth sufficient information from which the issuing magistrate judge could reasonably find the existence of probable cause for its issuance? More specifically, did the affidavit set forth sufficient f .2d 1052, 1067-68 (1993) (<HOLDING>); Cordova, 109 N.M. at 217, 784 P.2d at 36
holding federal good faith exception incompatible with provisions of state constitution holding that good faith exception does not apply because it is inconsistent with text of article 3823 recognizing that oath taken to honor state constitution makes it the justices duty to apply the state constitution when it does not conflict with the federal constitution recognizing exception under state constitution recognizing good faith exception to fourth amendment exclusionary rule