219-20 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (“Many courts have held that stray remarks in the workplace, by themselves, and without a demonstrated nexus to the co “if you were 20 years younger and blonde, and beautiful, you’d get [a bracelet]” was a stray remark); Pasha v. William M. Mercer Consulting, No. 00 Civ. 8362, 2004 WL 188077, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Feb.2, 2004) (no finding of age discrimination where supervisors talk about recruiting younger people and supervisor told plaintiff that they should be thinking of retirement at their age). Stating that someone within the employee’s protected group will better understand that employee, as Stadmeyer did when he said that Tomassi relates well to senior residents, is also a stray remark, de la Cruz v. New York City Human Res. Admin., 82 F.3d 16, 22 (2d Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, Stadmeyer’s alleged
holding that the district courts question do you also understand that under some circumstances you or the government may have the right to appeal any sentence that i impose did not comply with rule llbln and failed to properly notify the defendant about the waiver of his appellate rights holding superiors statement a stray remark because another employee was the plaintiffs immediate supervisor and had the authority to hire and fire  subordinates holding hispanic supervisor will understand you better to be stray remark holding that verbal threats such as we going to get you you better drop the suit do not rise to the level of adverse action holding that a comment made by a person who played no role in the employment decision was a stray remark that lacked any probative value as a matter of law