for many years. The principles of the Eñe doctrine often come into play in nondischarge-ability cases. In actions under § 523, there is, of course, a claim requesting a determination of nondischargeability. Oftentimes there is also a separate claim or request to establish and liquidate the debt. The claim for a nondischargeability determination is a matter of federal law governed by the terms of the Bankruptcy Code. Grogan v. Garner, 498 U.S. 279, 284, 111 S.Ct. 654, 112 L.Ed.2d 755 (1991). However, in determining the existence and the amount of the underlying debt, state law or other relevant nonbankruptcy law controls. Id. at 283, 284 n. 9, 111 S.Ct. 654; Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S. 443, 450-51, 127 S.Ct. 1199, 167 L.Ed.2d 178 (2007) (<HOLDING>). When a creditor asserts that attorney’s fees
recognizing rule that state law governs the substance of claims in bankruptcy proceedings holding state law governs property interests in bankruptcy proceedings unless some federal interest requires a different result   holding texas law governs the procedural matter of preservationoferror requirements even if another jurisdictions law governs substantive issues holding state law governs disputed ownership of lands holding that in a bankruptcy proceeding state law governs the rights of the parties with regard to interests in property