better than others. Thus, although the Supreme Court held in State v. Adams, 339 Or 104, 116 P3d 898 (2005), that a total delay of 23 months in a misdemeanor DUII prosecution was unreasonable even if it was attributable to a lack of judicial resources, longer delays have been held reasonable in other circumstances. For example, in State v. Ayers, 207 Or App 668, 692-93, 143 P3d 251, rev den, 342 Or 253 (2006), we held that a delay of more than four years was reasonable, given that the defendant had been incarcerated in Washington and, under the circumstances, the state could reasonably have assumed that she had waived the right to a speedy trial on the charges against her in Oregon. See also State v. Johnson, 342 Or 596, 616-17, 157 P3d 198 (2007), cert den, _ US _, 128 S Ct 906 (2008) (<HOLDING>); State v. Fleetwood, 186 Or App 305, 323, 63
holding that a delay of more than four years caused largely by the state making pretrial appeals was reasonable under the circumstances holding a four month delay to be reasonable under  3161h7 holding that a claim not alleged in the complaint was pretried by implied consent of the parties  during four years of discovery and other pretrial maneuverings holding delay of two years and four months lengthy enough to warrant review of other factors holding that a delay of more than eight years attributable to the normal workings of the appellate process in addressing a pretrial appeal is reasonable