a list of factors that may demonstrate that "a reasonable, innocent person would not feel free to decline the officers' requests or otherwise terminate the encounter." Jackson, 39 P.3d at 1184. +These factors include but are not limited to: (1) whether there is a display of authority or control over the defendant by activating the siren or any patrol car overhead lights; (2) the number of officers preéent; (3) whether the officer approaches in a nonthreatening manner; (4) whether the officer displays a weapon; (5) whether the officer requests or demands information; , - (6) whether the officer's tone of voice is c ce officer stopped the defendant when the officer told the defendant he could "be on [his] way if [he] didn't have any warrants"); of Paynter, 955 P.2d at 75 (Colo.1998) (<HOLDING>). We have emphasized that a stop occurs where
holding that the filed rate doctrine barred request for damages but did not preclude request for injunction and civil penalties holding officers request for passengers identification not unreasonable although unrelated to reason for stop where it did not prolong detention and passenger was under no obligation to answer holding that an officers request for a citizens identification by itself did not amount to a seizure holding officers request for passengers identification during stop constituted lawful consensual encounter holding that where the opportunity for positive identification is good and not weakened by prior failure to identify and the witness is positive in his identification even after crossexamination identification need not be received with caution