County argues that we should hold that there is no requirement of reasonable suspicion for strip searches of newly arrested detainees regardless of th 156-57 (5th Cir.1985) (“Because Lubbock County’s strip search policy was applied to minor offenders awaiting bond when no reasonable suspicion existed that they as a category of offenders or individually might possess weapons or contraband, under the balancing test of Wolfish we find such searches unreasonable and the policy to be in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”). The County argues that we should overrule those cases to bring our precedents into line with “the growing trend” among courts. As the County concedes, interpretations of Wolfish vary greatly between circuits. See, e.g., Bull, 595 F.3d at 980-81 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc) (<HOLDING>); Powell, 541 F.3d at 1314 (en banc) (holding
holding that mandatory routine visual strip search policy for all arrestees who were to be introduced into general jail population was constitutional holding that arrestees for minor offenses may be subjected to a strip search only if jail officials have probable cause to believe that arrestees are concealing weapons or contraband holding that mandatory visual strip search policy in county jail was unconstitutional holding that arrestees for minor offenses may be subjected to a strip search only if jail officials have reasonable suspicion to believe that arrestees are concealing weapons or contraband holding unconstitutional blanket jail policy of subjecting all arrestees to strip and visual body cavity searches