characteristics as a group characterization identifying a group of said subscribers, searching said subscriber electronic information with respect to said group characterization, and providing said map at said user location displaying the locations of members of said selected group identified by said group characterization relative to the location of said user station. Defendants contend that the emphasized elements of this claim, beginning with the terms providing, providing, selecting, searching, providing, constitute steps-plus-function limitations. 35 U.S.C. § 115 ¶ 6.1 disagree. Although not determinative, the term “step for” does not appear in this method claim. See Seal-Flex, Inc. v. Athletic Track and Court Construction, 172 F.3d 836, 849 (Fed.Cir.1999) (Rader, J., concurring) (<HOLDING>). Further, this method claim is not composed of
holding a claim invalid under preaia 35 usc  112  4 for claiming subject matter that was nonoverlapping with the claim from which it depended holding that only the words step for raise the presumption that 35 usc  112  6 applies recognizing presumption holding that although the presumption of correctness applies to the ultimate classification decision  the presumption carries no force as to questions of law holding that an original claim sufficiently described itself and that njothing more is necessary for compliance with the description requirement of the first paragraph of 35 usc  112