quantity of marijuana was present to permit testing defeats appellant’s suggestion that the amount involved was immeasurable.”)); One (1) 1983, Fifty-Seven Foot (57’) Gulfstream Vessel, 640 F.Supp. at 673 (same). In dismissing Brevard’s forfeiture complaint, the trial court determined: [T]he misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia is insufficient to establish that the Corvette was used in either committing or aiding and abetting the commission of a felony. The substance in the paraphernalia field tested positive for either methamphetamine or cocaine. Possession of either cocaine or methamphetamine is a third degree felony. However, Petitioner has failed to establish that a possessory offense has occurred. This was error. See Jones v. State, 589 So.2d 1001, 1002 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991) (<HOLDING>); see also Peterson v. State, 841 So.2d 661
holding that quantity of the controlled substance does not have to be measurable to support a conviction for possession of such controlled substance particularly when the immeasurable amount of the substance is found on an implement used to consume the substance holding that possession of listed chemical with intent to manufacture controlled substance is controlled substance offense holding that possession of a controlled substance is a crime only if the defendant knowingly possesses the substance and has knowledge of the nature of that substance holding that knowledge that a substance is a controlled substance is an element of  952 holding that mens rea required for possession of a controlled substance is knowledge that defendant possessed a controlled substance