testing results in evidence means that any such test results only may be used prior to a finding of paternity. We note first that subsection (b) of F.L. § 5-1029 provides that upon motion by a party to the case, the court “shall order” the mother, child, and the alleged father to submit to blood or genetic tests, as further provided in the section. Ordinarily, unless the context otherwise indicates, the word “shall,” except as used in its future sense, itself demonstrates a mandatory intent. In re James S., 286 Md. 702, 708, 410 A.2d 586 (1980); Maryland Medical Service, Inc. v. Carver, 238 Md. 466, 479, 209 A.2d 582 (1964); Barnes v. Pinkney, 236 Md. 564, 574, 204 A.2d 787 (1964); Dypski v. Bethlehem Steel Corp., 74 Md.App. 692, 698, 539 A.2d 1165 (1988). The connotation of the 935 (<HOLDING>). Those cases have not involved the application
holding that in domestic law custody case blood tests to determine paternity of child born out of wedlock may only be ordered upon a showing of good cause under the best interest of the child standard holding that the trial court must specifically consider whether it would be in the best interest of the child for the case to proceed before a putative father may be permitted to seek blood tests in an attempt to rebut the presumption of paternity holding that motion for blood tests filed in action premised on mdcode 1974 1991 replvol  1208 of the estates and trusts article by male claiming to be biological father of child born to married couple is best analyzed as a request for a physical examination under rule 2423 holding that the best interest of the child was the proper standard to apply in determining whether blood tests should be conducted holding that a child born to an intact marriage cannot be the subject of a paternity proceeding brought by a biological father and determining it was fundamental error for the trial court to grant relief pursuant to a nonexistent cause of action