to being “in shock” during the first robbery, was unduly influenced by Nieto when she examined the photo arrays, and is a “convicted drug felon.” Additionally, appellant argues that there was “no physical evidence” linking him to either robbery and that he has strong alibi testimony regarding both offenses. Because the jury is the exclusive judge of the credibility of the witnesses and of the weight to be given their testimony, we cannot, on appeal, weigh the credibility of the witnesses. See Barnes v. State, 876 S.W.2d 316, 321 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). Here, the jury chose to believe the testimony of Blackmon and Christian and disbelieve that of appellant’s alibi witnesses, and we cannot disturb the jury’s determination. See Losada v. State, 721 S.W.2d 305, 309 (Tex.Crim.App.1986) (<HOLDING>). Appellant argues that Blackmon admitted her
holding trial court is sole and exclusive judge of witnesses credibility holding jury as judge of credibility may believe all some or none of the testimony holding that trier of fact may believe one witness disbelieve others and resolve inconsistencies in the testimony of any witness holding that the postconviction court is the sole judge of the weight of the evidence and the credibility of witnesses holding jury is sole judge of witness credibility and may believe some witnesses and refuse to believe others