its employees, and Angela D. Self, M.D. ... is clearly below the accepted standards of medical care. The medical records are such that one cannot be certain what was going on other than that he was receiving mail order prescriptions. [Emphasis added.] This same standard of care was repeated, specifically mentioning only Dr. Self, in a later section of the report. According to the Clinic, Rushing fails to specifically describe the standard of care applicable to Dr. Self, Dr. Mercau, and the ... Clinic, i.e. what steps should have been taken and when. Rushing fails to state when [James] allegedly should have been examined and what assessments, testing, or evaluation allegedly should have been done and what such testing and evaluation allegedly would have sho x.App.-Dallas 2007, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the conduct of Dr. Self that the report
recognizing that a defendant physicians own practice was at least some evidence of the standard of care and concluding that the case was properly submitted to the jury notwithstanding the plaintiffs failure to call an independent expert on the standard of care holding that a manufacturers insert in and of itself may not establish the relevant standard of care in a medical negligence action but may be considered by the fact finder along with expert testimony to define the standard of care holding that standard of care need not be listed separately in report when same standard applies to each health care provider holding employers to an ordinary prudence standard of care holding whistleblower protections available under the washington health care act rcw 4370075 adequately promoted workplace safety ensured compliance with the accepted standard of care and prevented fraudulent billing in the health care industry