as defined under Virgin Islands law, albeit toward the end of convicting defendant for a completely separate offense, the court is free to go beyond the mere fact of conviction. Such is not the case here. The Court declines to revoke defendant's probation under V.I. Code § 3711(b). The government's motion is denied. An appropriate order is attached. ORDER This matter comes before the Court on the government's motion to revoke defendant's probation pursuant to V.I. Code Arm. tit. 5, § 3711(b). Having carefully considered its premises, it is hereby ORDERED that the government's motion is DENIED. 2 Larceny under Virgin Islands law can be similarly distinguished from Florida's crime of robbery with a weapon. SeeGovernment of the Virgin Islands v. Williams, 424 F.2d 526, 527 (3d Cir. 1970) (<HOLDING>). 3 Assault in the third degree also includes
holding that specific intent is an element of attempted illegal reentry holding that if defendants developed the intent to deprive the victim of his money only after they beat him unconscious theft would constitute larceny from the person but not robbery holding that damage to the property of another is an essential element of the offense of criminal mischief holding that petitioner could not challenge his conviction on the grounds that the indictment failed to charge an essential element of the crime through a writ of habeas corpus holding that the specific intent to deprive the owner permanently of his property is an essential element of the crime of larceny