School, Inc. v. Department of Education, 108 A.3d 192, 199 (Pa.Cmwlth.2015); and “where the legislature includes specific language in one section.of a statute and excludes it from another, it should not be implied where excluded,” Pennsylvania State Police, Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement v. Prekop, 156 Pa.Cmwlth. 250, 627 A.2d 223, 226 (1993). It is presumed “[t]hat the General Assembly does not intend a result that is absurd, impossible of execution or unreasonable.” Section 1922(1) of the Statutory Construction Act, 1 Pa. C.S. § 1922(1). Lastly, where a statute imposes punishment, such as the suspension or revocation of a professional license, for specified acts, such statutes are penal in nature. See Pa. State Real Estate Comm’n v. Keller, 401 Pa. 454,165 A.2d 79, 80 (1960) (<HOLDING>). Section 1928(b)(1) of the Statutory
holding that the real estate brokers law which provided for the investigation of the acts of real estate brokers and the suspension or revocation of their licenses for specified acts is penal and must be strictly construed holding that a real estate brokers allegations of an oral contract with prospective purchasers stated a cause of action recognizing implied private action for violation of the real estate brokers and salesmen license act holding the real estate sale proceeds holding brokers were not entitled to commission where agreement provided commission was payable at closing of real estate transaction because brokers did not produce clients that closed