reason to believe the detained individual may be armed and dangerous may conduct a pat-down search for weapons to ensure officer safety.’ ” (quoting United States v. Davis, 457 F.3d 817, 822 (8th Cir.2006))). The officers were executing a warrant at a place of suspected drug trafficking where weapons may have been present, and the officers were outnum bered by the suspects. Detective Canas could detain Cowan, temporarily handcuff Cowan, and pat Cowan down. A police officer “lawfully pat[ting] down a suspect’s outer clothing” may seize any “object whose contour or mass makes its identity immediately apparent” as incriminating evidence. See Minnesota v. Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 375, 113 S.Ct. 2130, 124 L.Ed.2d 334 (1993); United States v. Bustos-Torres, 396 F.3d 935, 944 (8th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). The Supreme Court noted in Texas v. Brown
holding the buie prong 1 exception is not available where the arrest took place just outside the home  recognizing the rule and the exception but holding facts did not support claim to exception holding the plain legal prejudice test applies to voluntary dismissal under the code holding the plain feel exception of dickerson applies to any incriminating evidence not just contraband recognizing exception