quite common vision of the university as more than the sum of classes in its course catalog — as a sort of sanctuary where young adults grow in a myriad of ways. See Widmar v. Vincent, 454 U.S. 263, 279 n. 2, 102 S.Ct. 269, 279 n. 2, 70 L.Ed.2d 440 (1981) (Stevens, J., concurring) (university “atmosphere” includes extracurricular activities, “critical aspect[s] of campus life”). As was said of the use of a similar activity fee at the University of Nebraska, “[w]ithin wide limitations a state is free to adopt such educational philosophy as it chooses. The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska obviously has embraced an educational philosophy that the education of students extends beyond that which takes place in the classroom.” Veed v. Schwartzkopf 353 F.Supp. 149, 152 (D.Neb.) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 478 F.2d 1407 (8th Cir.1973), cert.
holding proper remedy when a christian student newspaper was denied student activities funds was to make funds available to the religious paper not to deny funds to nonreligious student groups holding that university violated first amendment by expelling student for printing indecent newspaper despite student code prohibiting indecent conduct or speech holding student activity fees not to be state funds when they were segregated from university funds and the state treasury holding constitutional the granting of student activity funds to the campus newspaper holding that student activity fees collected under authority of state law and disbursed at direction of board of trustees are university funds