preferred embodiment of the invention, ... neither do the claims enlarge what is patented beyond what the inventor has described as the invention”). The remainder of Defendants’ construction, “that provides the specified power for the data node and that the low level current delivered to the access device,” is superfluous, as the information is contained in the claim itself, which specifies that power is supplied by the main power source to the data node and the low level current is delivered from the main power source. See, e.g., '930 Patent, col. 4:17-18, 4:22-23. Accordingly, the Court construes the term “main power source” to mean “a DC power source.” Secondary power source Claims 1, 2, 6, and 9 of the '930 Patent contain the term “secondary power source.” Network-1 c d.Cir.2008) (<HOLDING>). Network-1 also asserts that the claim
holding that two offenses are separate for the purposes of  4a12a1 where all the elements of the first offense occurred before any activity forming the basis of the second offense holding that congress envisioned two separate petitions filed to review two separate final orders holding unanimity requirement not violated when charge stated two separate counts with two separate and distinct offenses in each case holding that the evidence supported two separate convictions and punishments for two attempted robberies of two different victims who suffered separate and distinct harms holding that the term first and second juxtaposed drain ports does not require two separate identifiable physical elements