a jury found Mr. Perri guilty of the other offenses, he entered an open plea to the possession charges, and the trial court sentenced him as a habitual felony offender to concurrent terms of thirty years’ imprisonment with a three-year mandatory minimum for the possession of a firearm. Appellate counsel raised one issue on appeal concerning the trial court’s failure to dismiss three of the other counts with which Mr. Perri was charged. In ground three of his petition, Mr. Per-ri argues that appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to argue on appeal that his convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of the ammunition in the firearm by a convicted felon violated his double jeopardy rights. See Boyd v. State, 17 So.3d 812, 818 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009) (<HOLDING>) (citing Hill v. State, 711 So.2d 1221, 1224-25
holding that convictions for two counts of possession of one quantity of cocaine constituted double jeopardy and fundamental error reversing one possession conviction and remanding for resentencing holding that double jeopardy precludes dual convictions for felon in possession of a firearm and felon in possession of separate ammunition because section 790231 florida statutes prohibits possession of  any firearm ammunition or electric weapon or device emphasis in original holding evidence insufficient to support conviction of attempted possession of a prohibited weapon holding that because any precedes the list of items a felon is prohibited from possessing double jeopardy precludes more than one conviction for possession of any of the items listed holding that dual convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon violated double jeopardy