probable cause to conduct second search of automobile at station house); Rabadi v. State, 541 N.E.2d 271, 275 (Ind.1989) (“Where there is probable cause to believe that a vehicle was used in the commission of a crime and contains evidence, a search of the impounded vehicle may be conducted after the arrest at the police station.”). Turning to the facts of the instant case, the State offered evidence that the Jeep was linked to the crime scene and contained evidence when it was impounded. Thus, there was sufficient evidence to support a finding that the officers had probable cause to conduct a warrantless search of the vehicle less than a day after it was impounded. See Ex parte Boyd, 542 So.2d 1276, 1284-86 (Ala.1989), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 883, 110 S.Ct. 219, 107 L.Ed.2d 172 (1989) (<HOLDING>); Robinson v. State, 18 Md.App. 678, 308 A.2d
holding a month delay in search of a computer constitutional because probable cause continued to exist at the time of the search and no prejudice occurred holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same holding the search of a computer after the warrant had expired constitutional because despite the delay probable cause for the search continued to exist holding warrantless search of defendants automobile four days after impoundment was permissible under requirements of fourth amendment and state constitution where officers had probable cause to search vehicle when it was impounded and that probable cause continued between the time of the impoundment and the search holding that impoundment of a vehicle can be a seizure under the fourth amendment