as “involuntary” roommates, this term is a misnomer. The only students who are assigned roommates are those who have requested a double room but not specified a particular individual with whom they would like to live — in essence asking that the university assign them a roommate. As such, all assigned roommates have voluntarily agreed to be assigned to whomever the university chooses for them. Despite defendants' word choice, there would be nothing "involuntary” about being assigned to room with plaintiff, or anyone else. 28 . Of course, she should be assigned a roommate only in the event she requests a double room and does not specify a particular individual with whom she would like to room. 29 . See also Smith v. Robinson, 468 U.S. 992, 104 S.Ct. 3457, 82 L.Ed.2d 746, n. 24 (1584) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, in this instance, the state is
recognizing there is some confusion among the circuit courts as to the availability of damages under  504 of the rehabilitation act and without expressing an opinion on the matter noting that courts generally agree damages are available for violations of  504 holding that emotional distress damages are not recoverable under section 504 recognizing conflicting eleventh circuit authority on whether  504 of the rehabilitation act could serve as the basis for a  1983 laws action holding that punitive damages may not be awarded  in suits brought under  202 of the ada and  504 of the rehabilitation act holding  504 of the rehabilitation act does not require equivalent benefits for different disabilities