language clearly provides that any “person aggrieved” may file a complaint and that a “person” includes an “individual” as well as a “legal representative.” §§ 760.11(1), 760.02(6), (10), Fla. Stat. The use of the word “includes” in a definitional section “is usually taken to mean that it may include other things as well.” Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner, Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal Texts 226 (2012). For example, the statute’s reference to a “legal representative,” as well as a joint-stock company, labor uni air import of its terms and shall be liberally construed to further the general purposes stated [in chapter 760] and the special purposes of the particular provision involved.” § 760.01(3), Fla. Stat.; see Joshua v. City of Gainesville, 768 So.2d 432, 436 (Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>). Giving the FCRA its plain and obvious
holding that a governments consent to be sued must be construed strictly in favor of the sovereign holding that criminal statutes of limitation should be construed in favor of the accused holding that the term commerce in the faa is to be broadly construed holding that as title vi is a remedial statute the zone of interests to be protected  must be construed broadly holding that the fcra must be construed broadly in favor of remediation