with Hotel Eden, and the hotel declined to stipulate to the mechanism by which Travel Bound books rooms in Hotel Eden. Furthermore, Hotel Eden has declined to turn over documents that might demonstrate the lack of an agency relationship. Based on the record before the Court, it appears that plaintiffs have averred sufficient facts that, if proven, demonstrate that Travel Bound was acting as an agent for Hotel Eden in New York. Hotel Eden’s argument to the contrary must, on this record, be rejected. Hotel Eden’s presence on the Summit Hotels website, which also permits reservations to be confirmed automatically supports our finding that Hotel Eden is “doing business” in the State of New York. See Hsin Ten Enterprise USA v. Clark Enterprises, 138 F.Supp.2d 449, 455-56 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (<HOLDING>). Given the ways described above in which Hotel
holding that a public employee who can be discharged only for cause is entitled to at least some informal due process before he can be terminated holding that in an action for breach of contract only nominal damages can be recovered if there is no evidence produced from which the facts necessary to determine damages under the proper rule can be determined holding that in certain circumstances fraud can be prosecuted under the statute recognizing that there can be compelling circumstances in which a trial court can determine that neither party prevailed in a contract case holding that interactive websites in which customers can place and confirm orders can be sufficient for a finding that a company has transacted business in new  york under cplr  302a1