only if the trial court makes an express written finding of no just reason to delay either enforcement, appeal, or both. 155 Ill. 2d R. 304(a). Without a Rule 304(a) finding, a final order disposing of fewer than all the claims is not an appealable order and does not become appealable until all of the claims are resolved. Marsh v. Evangelical Covenant Church of Hinsdale, 138 Ill. 2d 458, 464, 563 N.E.2d 459, 463 (1990). A petition for dissolution advances a single claim — dissolution of the parties’ marriage. In re Marriage of Leopando, 96 Ill. 2d 114, 119, 449 N.E.2d 137, 140 (1983). Therefore, issues raised in a dissolution-of-marriage case are ancillary to the cause of action, not separate claims and not appealable under Rule 304(a). Leopando, 96 Ill. 2d at 119, 449 N.E.2d at 140 (<HOLDING>). This case does not involve a petition for
holding order awarding father temporary partial custody prior to custody hearing was not final and appealable under rule 341 holding that a courts custody order was not a final order and not appealable with a rule 304a finding because a petition for dissolution advances a single claim holding that an order was interlocutory in nature despite the trial courts certification of the order as a final appealable judgment holding that a rehearing order was not final or appealable holding that a bankruptcy court order denying a trustees claim to immunity was final and appealable under the collateral order doctrine