although Defendant was possibly liable at one point for AMSA’s contractual liabilities, all such claims have now expired. Based on the foregoing, the Court finds that Plaintiffs breach of contract claims accruing prior to June 8, 2005 are barred by New York State’s six-year statute of limitations, both as to Plaintiffs claims against Defendant as AMSA’s successor, and as to its claims brought directly against Defendant. 2. Negligence causes of action Under New York law, a negligence claim is governed by a three-year statute of limitations. See N.Y. C.P.L.R. § 214. This limitations period begins to run from the date of the alleged negligent act, regardless of when it was allegedly discovered or should have been discovered. See Ruso v. Morrison, 695 F.Supp.2d 33, 44-45 (S.D.N.Y.2010) (<HOLDING>); see also Bond v. Progressive Ins. Co., 82
holding that although the form of relief alone does not govern the categorization of a claim as a tort or other type of action a trial court must consider the nature of the relief sought to determine whether a particular claim lies in tort or could lie in tort holding that a claim is waived on appeal when not supported by citation to relevant authority holding alleged disclosure of personal medical information to other employees sufficiently met elements of private facts tort holding that  stated another way accrual occurs when the claim becomes enforceable ie when all elements of the tort can be truthfully alleged in a complaint  quotation and other citation omitted holding prior publication must not only disclose all elements of the claim within the four corners of the document but must also disclose those elements arranged as in the claim internal citations omitted