exception and recover economic damages in negligence, (1) the economic damages must result from “a sudden, dangerous, or calamitous event,” and (2) the event must also cause “personal injury or property damage.” In re Chicago Flood Litigation, 176 Ill. 2d at 200-01; see also Trans State Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc., 177 Ill. 2d 21, 26-27 (1997). The trial court held that the September 2008 storms were not a sudden or dangerous occurrence and that the exception consequently does not apply, barring plaintiffs negligence claim under the Moor-man doctrine. Plaintiff argues on appeal that the trial court should have accepted the precedent of Mars for the proposition that the September 2008 storms were a sudden and dangerous occurrence. See Mars, 327 Ill. App. 3d at 353 (<HOLDING>). Plaintiff further argues that the second
holding that insurer who after being told of occurrence contacted insureds attorney for information should have issued reservation of rights letter within a reasonable time after  it was informed of the occurrence holding that there was no coverage because there was no occurrence within the meaning of the policy because defective workmanship does not constitute an accident or an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy holding the payment of benefits at the occurrence of a single event an indicium of lack of an administrative scheme holding that the phrase sudden and accidental is not a synonym for unexpected and unintended and that the discharge of coal dust over an eight year period was not sudden holding that a single thunderstorm was a sudden and dangerous occurrence