disabled child would be inconsistent with the IDEA’S burden that the parents prove the IEP’s inadequacy as a prerequisite for “obtaining a judgment mandating that the [child’s] school district provide their child with an education program demonstrated to be an appropriate one.” Winkelman, 550 U.S. at 532, 127 S.Ct. 1994 (bracketed material and underlining added). That the Court did not perceive the relief sought to be properly available in an IDEA action by the disabled child’s parent, to be available against state educational agencies involved in the review process based upon the Act’s impartial review scheme, is instructive. See also Sch. Comm. of the Town of Burlington, Mass. v. Dep’t. of Educ. of the Commonwealth of Mass., 471 U.S. 359, 370, 105 S.Ct. 1996, 85 L.Ed.2d 385 (1985) (<HOLDING>) (underlining added). Nor does the fact that
holding that court may order reimbursement of private school expenses incurred by parents of handicapped child in successful challenge to iep brought under eha predecessor to idea stating that it is beyond cavil that appropriate relief would include a prospective injunction directing the school official to develop and implement at public expense an iep placing the child in a private school and affirming reimbursement award against petitioner local school district  holding that a students private school tuition should be reimbursed where parent did not unilaterally place student in private school because the school district tacitly consented to the private school attendance before proposing a different placement holding that because the challenged iep was adequate the defendant school board could not be ordered to reimburse the parents for expenses incurred as a result of their decision to remove their child from the  program holding that a school district was not liable for sexual molestation of plaintiffs daughter by a teacher even though the acts occurred on school property and during school hours holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials