for the raising of an issue by a party in interest shall be construed to preclude the court from, sua sponte, taking any action or making any determination necessary or appropriate to enforce or implement court orders or rules, or to prevent an abuse of process. 11 U.S.C. § 105(a). See, e.g., ZiLOG, Inc. v. Corning (In re ZiLOG, Inc.), 450 F.3d 996, 1007 (9th Cir.2006) (“A party who knowingly violates the discharge injunction can be held in contempt under section 105(a) of the bankruptcy code.”); Dyer, 322 F.3d at 1189-90 (“Although the availability of civil contempt sanctions under § 105(a) has a checkered past in our circuit, the recent precedent makes clear that this remedy is available.” (footnote omitted)); Walls v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 276 F.3d 502, 507 (9th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); State of Cal. Employment Dev. Dep’t. v. Taxel
holding a bankruptcy court is empowered to reopen a bankruptcy case on its own motion under 11 usc  105a holding that  524a may be enforced by the bankruptcy courts contempt power under  105a holding that in addition to statutory contempt powers city courts have inherent contempt power recognizing civil contempt power under  105a holding that section 105a facilitates compliance with the bankruptcy code and the bankruptcy courts orders and compliance is one of the central goals of civil contempt sanctions