(2) engaged in the “sale of counterfeit and infringing Louis Vuitton branded products within this Judicial District through multiple fully interactive commercial websites”; (3) purposefully directed illegal activities “towards consumers in ... Florida through the ... sale of counterfeit Louis Vuitton branded goods into the State”; (4) was “selling and/or offering for sale counterfeit products, including at least handbags and wallets, using trademarks which are exact copies of the Louis Vuitton Marks”; and (5) was “actively ... advertising, distributing, selling ... substantial quantities” of these infringing goods in Florida and elsewhere. These allegations established a prima facie case of jurisdiction over Mosseri. See Posner v. Essex Ins. Co., 178 F.3d 1209, 1216 (11th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). To shift the burden back to the plaintiff, a
holding the plaintiff satisfies the burden of a prima facie case by a preponderance of the evidence holding that a prima facie case is subject to independent review holding that a nonfrivolous allegation of board jurisdiction is one which if true would establish a prima facie case that the board has jurisdiction over the matter at issue holding to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination a plaintiff must show he 1 holding that the plaintiff alleged facts unrebutted by salem that established a prima facie case of jurisdiction over salem