of 29-A MRSA Section 2482(1). Morris D. Murphy’s right to operate was under suspension on October 15, 2008 because the statutory conditions for restoration had not been satisfied. I further certify that the attached copy is a tr 1224 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2009) (stating that the certificate was: (1) accusatory; (2) "introduced to establish an element of the crime”; (3) "prepared at the request of law enforcement as part of its investigation”; and (4) "evaluative in the sense that it represent[ed] not simply the production of an existing record, but an assertion regarding the results of an individual’s search of a database or databases”). Another court has held that a defendant's right to confrontation was not violated at the punishment stage of trial when an exhibit 4, 917-18 (2008) (<HOLDING>); Jasper v. Virginia, 49 Va.App. 749, 644
holding that admission in evidence of certified copies of docket sheets of defendants prior convictions did not violate defendants sixth amendment right to confrontation because such records are not testimonial holding that doctrine does not violate right of confrontation holding that admission of business records does not violate the confrontation clause under roberts holding that driving records were nontestimonial holding that the introduction of driving records without a witness did not violate a defendants right to confrontation