in which the declarant is young, particularly where the statement was made during the child’s first opportunity alone with a trusted adult. See id. (acknowledging that children may stay excited longer than adults); Arnold, 25 M.J. at 132 (statement of 16-year-old rape victim held admissible despite at least a 12-hour lapse between the rape and the statement); United States v. Farley, 992 F.2d 1122, 1126 (10th Cir.1993)(admitting statements of five-year old though one statement was made two hours after the assault and the other at least 12 hours after the assault); Morgan, 846 F.2d at 947 (finding that a four-year old’s three-hour lapse in reporting an assault was “well within the bounds of reasonableness” for an excited utterance); Gross v. Greer, 773 F.2d 116,119-20 (7th Cir.1985)(<HOLDING>); Iron Shell, 633 F.2d at 86 (admitting
holding that statement must be product of a startling event holding that a hearsay statement can itself be considered in first determining if a conspiracy existed when the statement was made holding that a defendant waives right to object to a hearsay statement on confrontation grounds when he or she offers the statement holding that a lower court properly admitted a fouryear olds hearsay statement although she made it 1215 hours after the startling event holding trial court could have found startling event or condition was declarants sustaining an injury or the pain she later experienced