of M.T.’s conduct with Student provides a meaningful basis for a determination that immediate discipline is necessary in order to prevent a recurrence of M.T.’s conduct with another student. E. Remaining Challenges M.T. raises several other arguments: (1) that the Commission erred and violated M.T.’s rights by failing to include in the certified record a transcript of oral argument before the Commission; (2) that laches bars the Commission’s action; (3) that the Commission failed to issue a decision within the time requirements of the Act; and (4) that the proceedings violated his due process and equal protection rights. We reject these arguments because M.T. has failed to adequately brief them. Pa. R.A.P. 2119; see City of Philadelphia v. Berman, 863 A.2d 156, 161 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004) (<HOLDING>). But even if he had preserved those issues for
holding that failure to raise issue in brief constitutes waiver of appeal of the issue recognizing that failure to develop claim on appeal constitutes waiver holding that failure to brief an argument constitutes waiver holding that partys failure to develop issue in argument section constitutes waiver of issue holding failure to brief argument constitutes waiver