civil action for their recovery. A. Equitable Relief Under ERISA Section 502(a)(3)(B) creates a civil action for equitable relief “(i) to redress ... violations [of any provision of this subchapter or the terms of the plan] or (ii) to enforce any provisions of this subchapter or the terms of the plan.” 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(3)(B). Therefore, by its terms, ERISA allows equitable relief in two situations: when a plaintiff seeks to remedy a plan breach, or when a plaintiff seeks to enforce rights granted under a plan or the statute. It provides no relief in the absence of a breach, e 208 (8th Cir.1981) (awarding prejudgment interest after a violation of ERISA). As the Depen-dahl court noted, the breach need not result from bad faith, but there must be a breach. Dependahl, 653 F.2d at 1219 (<HOLDING>). In the present case, plaintiff asks this
holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest on attorneys fees paid prior to the entry of judgment holding in an erisa case decided after greatwest that monetary relief in the form of prejudgment interest may be equitable in nature holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest at the colorado statutory rate of 8 percent holding the erisa plan administrators good faith to be only one of a number of factors considered in awarding prejudgment interest holding that only relevant factors must be considered