U.S. at 671, 64 S.Ct. 1240. While independent review in Bose pertains to the constitutional issue of whether actual malice has been established, in citizenship cases independent review is necessarily broader because the constitutional issue is whether the burden of revoking citizenship has been met — the primary and only issue in this case. 10 . In 1952 someone claiming to be Salvador Mondaca-Vega applied for a social security card, but the government did not present any evidence tying that application to Petitioner. Unlike Reynaldo Mondaca’s application, Salvador Mondaca-Vega’s application does not contain a signature. 11 . The government contends that the “ultimate issue in this case is whether Petitioner is Salvador Mondaca-Vega ... or Reynaldo Mondaca Carlon.” See also Maj. at 1086 (<HOLDING>). 12 . The majority relies on Societe Generate
holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record holding that pretext is subject to the clearly erroneous standard holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination under title vii was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record holding that the district courts key finding that petitioner is salvador mondacavega is not clearly erroneous holding bankruptcy courts finding of proximate causation not to be clearly erroneous