the Court in this case but none has been received in any other ease on the effect of Pub.L. No. 105-111, although the Court was in the process of ordering such briefing in Donovan when the appellant there filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit), thus divesting this Court of jurisdiction over that appeal, see Cerullo v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 195, 196 (1991); Donovan v. Gober, 11 Vet.App. 2 (1997) (per curiam order) (Steinberg and Kramer, JJ., concurring). The Court’s opinion in Dittrich holds that a CUE claim as to an unappealed and therefore final 1960 Veterans’ Administration (now Department of Veterans Affairs) (VA) regional office (RO) decision was not able to be raised under Smith (William) v. Brown, 35 F.3d 1516, 1527 (Fed.Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>), because that final VARO decision was
holding that traditional allocation of burden of proof to the party challenging the decisions applies to decisions under the tca holding that the supreme court has final appellate review of agency decisions holding that the courts jurisdiction is limited to the appeal of final board decisions that are adverse to the claimant holding that this courts review of board decisions is limited to final orders or final decisions holding that cue review applies only to prior final decisions of agencies of original jurisdiction ros and not to prior decisions of the board