for a separate transaction. An examination of the various jurisdictions that have spoken on this matter reveals that no clear consensus has been reached. See generally John F. Wagner, Jr., Annotation, Applicability of Article 9 of Uniform Commercial Code to Assignment of Rights Under Real-Estate Sales Contract, Lease Agreement, or Mortgage of the Anthony’s interest in the subject real estate contract, which is deemed a personalty in New Mexico, is within the scope of Article 9 of the Code and thus subject to its perfection requirements. While the Alsups do not dispute the characterization of their interest as personalty, they argue the transaction is nevertheless excluded from Article 9 under Section 55-9 — 104(j) which states: eborn), 94 Wash.2d 336, 617 P.2d 424 (1980) (En Banc) (<HOLDING>). The essence of the trustee’s position is that
holding when both real property and contract rights are assigned assignee must both record under the real estate laws and file pursuant to article 9 holding that trustee may bring assigned creditor claims where estate is the real party in interest holding witness not licensed as real estate appraiser could not testify as expert on real estate valuation where statute made it unlawful to engage in real estate appraisal without license holding prospectively that a vendees interest in a real estate contract constitutes real estate within the meaning of the judgment lien statute holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner