Utah R.App. P. 11(a) (detailing the composition of the record on appeal). Mother then motioned to supplement the record or remand to the juvenile court for further findings regarding ineffective assistance of counsel. We denied that motion on July 12, 2006, because a rule 23B remand is limited to criminal cases. See Utah R.App. P. 28B(a). After allegedly discovering what transpired at the November 2, 2005 adjudication hearing, Mother unsuccessfully exhausted all of her alternatives for providing this court with record evidence supporting her ineffective assistance of counsel claim. T16 Still, the procedural rules for child welfare appeals clearly contemplate claims for ineffective assistance of counsel. See Utah R.App. P. 55(b); see also In re E.H., 880 P.2d 11, 13 (Utah Ct.App.1994) (<HOLDING>). By not allowing Mother to submit record
holding that the due process clause of the alaska constitution guarantees the right to effective counsel in proceedings for the termination of parental rights holding that the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel does not extend to parental termination proceedings without identifying any specific constitutional provision holding that in parental termination proceedings the parent is entitled to effective assistance of counsel holding because right to counsel is constitutionally guaranteed in parental termination proceeding effective assistance of counsel is also constitutionally required recognizing that the statutory right to counsel in parental termination cases requires that the appointed counsel provide effective assistance