(2012). Mem. Op. at 10 n.2. But the Court explained that records required to be disclosed under FOIA are exempt from the Privacy Act. Id., citing 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b)(2). 2 . FOIA Exemption 7(C) exempts documents compiled for law enforcement that "could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C). 3 . F0IA Exemption 6 allows withholding of "personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which "would constitute a clearty unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(6). 4 . Since plaintiff has not challenged defendant's withholdings of the remaining documents in the OPF, the Court will treat the validity of those withholdings as conceded. See Fischer v. DOJ, 723 F.Supp.2d 104, 110 (D.D.C.2010) (<HOLDING>). 5 . 5 C.F.R. § 293.311 provides: (a) The
holding district court has complete discretion whether to treat facts as conceded where local rule is violated holding that ajbsent a meaningful opposition  the court treats defendants motion as conceded holding that the court may properly treat as conceded any exemptions and categories that plaintiff does not address in its opposition holding that plaintiff conceded the merits of an issue when he did not respond in any way to defendants argument on that issue in his opposition before the district court holding that claims raised for the first time in an opposition to a motion for summary judgment are not properly before a court