one-half interest in the property owned by the couple. See La. Civ. Code Ann. § 2336 (“Each spouse owns a present undivided one-half interest in the community property. . . .”); Wallack v. Wallack, 211 Ga. 745, 748 (88 SE2d 154) (1955) (stating, in an equity case based on an accounting, that “where community property is not disposed of in a divorce between the parties, or is not referred to in the decree, or put in issue by the pleadings, the former husband and wife become as to such property tenants in common”). Appellee later moved to Georgia, and in 2008, Appellant filed a complaint against him in Liberty County Superior Court seeking the imposition of a constructive trust on her interest in his military retirement benefits. See Warner v. Warner, 651 So.2d 1339, 1340 (La. 1995) (<HOLDING>). Appellant subsequently amended the complaint
holding that military retirement benefits are to be considered deferred pay for past services holding that a spouses military retirement benefits were community property even though the employee spouse enlisted in the united states air force six years prior to the marriage holding that a former spouse is a proportionate owner of the other spouses future military retirement pay and is thus entitled to onehalf of the percentage of such pay representing the number of military marriage years relative to the total length of military service holding that  disposable retirement pay  from military pension was equal to gross retirement pay less federal income taxes holding that military retirement benefits are current pay and thus significantly different than other retirement benefits