Isiain Johnsonmarin appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and the district court’s non-mandatory condition of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 and 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm in part and reverse and remand in part. Johnsonmarin argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence from a searched vehicle because Johnsonmarin was not a recent occupant of the vehicle. We disagree. The circumstantial evidence reasonably supports the conclusion that Johnsonmarin was a recent occupant of the vehicle, and therefore the search-incident-to-arrest exception to the warrant requirement applies. See Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332, 351, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009) (<HOLDING>). Johnsonmarin argued that the police officers
holding that an officer may search a suspects vehicle incident to a lawful arrest holding new jersey constitution prohibits search of auto incident to arrest where occupant removed from vehicle and secured elsewhere holding police incident to arrest of occupant of automobile may search entire passenger compartment of vehicle holding that after making an arrest of the driver of a vehicle the police may search the passenger compartment of the vehicle holding that the vehicle of a recent occupant may be searched incident to arrest as an exception to the warrant requirement where it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest