both frivolous and malicious and worthy of sanction. V. Filing, Fee Alternatively, in the event that an appellate c 1996), (recognizing that the PLRA became effective April 26, 1996). 10 . See Ayo v. Bathey, 106 F.3d at 100, and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). In addition, the PLRA, i.e., § 1915(b), also requires a prisoner who proceeds In Forma Pauperis to pay the full amount of the filing fee, which may be collected in installments withdrawn from the prisoner’s inmate trust fund account. Ayo v. Bathey, 106 F.3d at 100. "The fee provisions of the PLRA were designed to deter frivolous prisoner litigation in the courts ■by making all prisoners seeking to bring lawsuits or appeals feel the deterrent effect ., 847 F.2d at 194; Lodge Hall Music, Inc. v. Waco Wrangler Club, Inc., 831 F.2d at 80; (<HOLDING>); Barker v. Norman, 651 F.2d at 1123; and
holding that a statement that the affiant is president of the company asserting a claim on an account is sufficient to affirmatively show how the affiant has personal knowledge of the affidavit statements regarding the account holding that the affiants statement  based upon his belief  did not demonstrate the personal knowledge required by fedrcivp 56e holding that a verified complaint can be considered as summary judgment evidence only to the extent that it comports with the requirements of rule 56e holding that rule 56e requires that summary judgment affidavits be based upon personal knowledge contain admissible evidence and affirmatively demonstrate the competency of the affiant to testify as to the matters contained therein holding that a statement that the affiant is senior vicepresident and secretary of a corporation asserting a special appearance is sufficient to affirmatively show how the affiant has personal knowledge of the affidavit statements regarding the corporations contacts with texas