discretion when it makes an error of law.” In re Superior Crewboats, Inc., 374 F.3d at 334 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). “Accordingly, the abuse of discretion standard includes review to determine that the discretion was not guided by erroneous legal conclusions.” In re Coastal Plains, Inc., 179 F.3d at 205 (internal quotation marks omitted). We also review for abuse of discretion a district court’s denial of a motion to substitute the trustee for the debtor as the party plaintiff. Wieburg v. GTE Sw. Inc., 272 F.3d 302, 308 (5th Cir.2001) (addressing a motion to substitute as the proper party in interest under Rule 17(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure) (citing Collateral Control Corp. v. Deal (In re Covington Grain Co.), 638 F.2d 1357, 1360 (5th Cir.1981) (<HOLDING>)). Questions of law, including interpretation
holding that the admission of evidence under an exception to the hearsay rule is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding that denial of joinder motion is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding that the imposition of sanctions is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding under third circuit law that the denial of a motion for reconsideration is reviewed for abuse of discretion holding that a rule 25 motion to substitute the real party in interest following a transfer of interest while the litigation is pending is reviewed for abuse of discretion