In interpreting Perdue, this Court stated that, “because Congress expressly limited the applicability of § 3582(c)(2) to ‘defendants] whose sentence was based on a subsequently-lowered sentencing range’ and Amendment 706 did not change the base offense level for career offenders under § 4B1.1, defendants sentenced as career offenders are not eligible for sentence modification under § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 706.” United States v. Williams, 367 Fed.Appx. 578, 578 (6th Cir.2010) (per curiam) (quoting Perdue, 572 F.3d at 292) (internal quotation marks omitted by Williams court) (affirming district court’s denial of a sentence reduction pursuant to Amendment 706 because of the defendant’s status as a career offender); see also United States v. Gillis, 592 F.3d 696, 700 (6th Cir.2009) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Bridgewater, 606 F.3d 258,
holding that reduced career offender status was nonetheless based the career offender guidelines holding that amendment 706 would not affect the guideline ranges for career offenders sentenced under  4b11 holding a reduction in defendants sentence as a career offender was not authorized under  3582c2 because amendment 706 did not lower his applicable guideline range under the careeroffender guidelines holding that a defendant determined to be a career offender is ineligible to receive the benefits of amendment 706 holding that a defendant whose sentence is based on his status as a career offender under  4b11 is not entitled to  3582c2 relief because amendments 706 and 713 do not lower the applicable guideline range for a career offender