him or her to deportation pursuant to the laws and regulations governing the United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. It shall not be necessary for the trial judge to inquire as to whether the defendant is a United States citizen, as this admonition shall be given to all defendants in all cases. In the instant case, the trial court asked the defendant if he was aware that his plea could have “adverse consequences” to his immigration status. We find that advising a defendant that the plea may have “adverse consequences” to her or his immigration status does not necessarily imply deportation, and therefore does not comply with the mandate of the Rule. See Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059, 1064 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (en banc), reversed on other grounds, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000) (<HOLDING>) “Adverse consequences” to an individual’s
holding that the trial judge must comply with rule 3172c8 and advise all defendants in all cases that the plea may subject him or her to deportation  holding that presumption that respondent exercised undue influence by preparing will that left all of the decedents property to him was amply rebutted by evidence that decedent had made an earlier will ineffective because not witnessed leaving all her property to him and had written him a letter stating that she was leaving all her property to him holding that the petition must be signed by all defendants or the signer mustallege consent of all defendants holding that the defendant is not entitled to be sentenced by the judge who took his plea when the judge made no promise to sentence him holding a plea affidavit is properly incorporated in the record when the trial judge ascertains in the plea colloquy that the defendant has read has understood and acknowledges all the information contained therein