the latest, on the date of the filing of the complaint, January 24, 2013, the 'statute of limitations would have expired three years later in January 2016. Further, the three unlitigated claims were nonsuited on February 20, 2015, and had to be refiled within one year. The claims were not refiled. Thus, on March 3, 2016, when appellants filed their motion to dismiss with prejudice the three unlitigated claims, those claims no longer could be litigated by appellees. Accordingly, those three unlitigated claims were no longer a bar to finality, and the court’s May 2, 2016 order denying the motion to dismiss with prejudice the three unlitigated claims constituted a final order from which appellants timely appealed. See Deer/Mt. Judea Sch. Dist., 2013 Ark. 393, at 7-8, 430 S.W.3d at 36-37 (<HOLDING>); Mountain Pure LLC, 366 Ark. 62, 233 S.W.3d
holding that the circuit courts order concluding that it was without jurisdiction to entertain a complaint because the case had been dismissed without prejudice constituted a final order because all other claims either had been refiled or dismissed with prejudice holding that a bankruptcy court order denying a trustees claim to immunity was final and appealable under the collateral order doctrine recognizing that an order denying a motion to modify a family court order where the motion is based on changed factual or legal circumstances is appealable as a special order after final judgment holding that an order denying a motion to vacate a  1782 order and denying a motion to quash the subpoena was immediately appealable holding that an order denying a motion for reconsideration constituted a final order because at the time the order was entered all nonsuited claims had been adjudicated and were no longer a bar to finality