CURIAM. Although this case reflects a tragic workplace accident that cost Olegario Rin-con his life, there was insufficient evidence that his supervisors acted with culpable negligence within the meaning of section 440.11(l)(b), Florida Statutes (2009), as is required to remove this case from the ambit of the laws of Worker’s Compensation. See Fla. Dep’t of Transp. v. Juliano, 864 So.2d 11, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (<HOLDING>); Mekamy Oaks, Inc. v. Snyder, 659 So.2d 1290,
holding there is no right to a specific dollar remedy holding that defendants were not in control and therefore were not supervisors and not subject to liability under  1983 holding that if appellate court determines segregation was required but not done proper remedy is not that party recover no fees but that judgment be reversed and the case remanded for more evidence holding there was no evidence of culpable negligence where supervisors were merely aware of poor condition and could have done more to remedy it holding that erroneous manslaughter instruction that defendant intentionally caused the death of the victim did not constitute fundamental error certifying question  if a jury returns a verdict finding a defendant guilty of seconddegree murder in a case where the evidence does not support a theory of culpable negligence does a trial court commit fundamental error by giving a flawed manslaughter by act instruction when it also gives an instruction on manslaughter by culpable negligence