to their interests. As it is clear that the administrator in selling the land for the purposes stated in the order of sale was not acting as the agent or with the consent of Rigby or his heirs, we must hold that the sale was not the voluntary sale at which Rigby intended to give the lessees the right of first refusal. It follows that the lessees had at the sale no preference over other bidders. Id. at 968, 969 (citations omitted). There are other cases which also analyze the voluntary or involuntary nature of the sale, together with the language of the agreement or other document creating the right, in determining whether an existing right of first refusal is triggered. See, e.g., Royal Oldsmobile Co. v. Heisler Props. L.L.C., Case No. 10-CA-152, 58 So.3d 483 (La.App. 5th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>); Central Exec. Comm. of ODWU, Inc., v. Carbon
holding gratuitous transfer of real property to hospital did not trigger right of first refusal holding right of first refusal only applied to a voluntary sale and taking of property by condemnation is involuntary therefore right of first refusal not triggered holding courtordered sale of property to satisfy judgment against lessor was involuntary sale and did not trigger lessees right of first refusal since agreement required that lessor be a willing seller of the property holding united states marshals involuntary bankruptcy sale of property did not trigger right of first refusal holding sale of property by county taxing authority to pay delinquent taxes did not trigger right of first refusal provision contained in deed