a sentencing court to enhance a defendant’s offense level two levels if he was “an organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor in any criminal activity....” U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c). “To qualify for an adjustment under this section, the defendant must have been the organizer, leader, manager, or supervisor of one or more other participants.” Id. comment, (n.2) (emphasis added). The probation officer recommended that the court enhance Harness’s offense level two levels because he “exercised management responsibility over the property and assets of the victim organization as contemplated by U.S.S.G. § 3Bl.l(c), Application Note 2.” PSR at 6, ¶ 25. This was an incorrect application of section 3B1.1(c) because the enhancement requires that the defendant organize, lead, man 21 (6th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Jobe, 101 F.3d 1046, 1068
recognizing that a specific statute controls over a general one recognizing that enhancement requires control over a participant in the scheme not only control over the scheme itself holding a downward departure  may be appropriate for a relatively young defendant with a brief criminal career holding appeal of enhancement under ussg  3allb waived because it was an adjustment rather than an upward departure  recognizing that enhancement required only when defendant exerts control over another participant whereas upward departure may be appropriate if defendant controls only assets or activities of the criminal enterprise