. See Sheets v. Yamaha Motors Corp., USA, 891 F.2d 533, 538 (5th Cir.1990) (stating that "[a]lthough the filing of a paper for an improper purpose is not immunized from Rule 11 sanctions simply because it is well grounded in fact and law, only under unusual circumstances-such as the filing of excess not so ruled. Moreover, several bankruptcy courts, including those within the district, have imposed 1927 sanctions where a bankruptcy case was filed in 'bad faith’ ” In re Argus Group 1700, Inc. v. Steinman, 1997 WL 87623 at *3 n. 2 (E.D.Pa.). 27 . Before a court can order the imposition of attorneys’ fees under 1927, it must find willful bad faith on the part of the offending attorney. Baker Indus., Inc., 764 F.2d at 208. See also Hackman v. Valley Fair, 932 F.2d 239, 242 (3d Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). A finding of bad faith is required in order
holding that a finding of bad faith on the part of the offending lawyer is a prerequisite for imposing sanctions under 1927 holding that disbarment is the presumptively appropriate sanction under both the florida standards for imposing lawyer sanctions and case law when a lawyer misappropriates trust funds holding that a finding of plaintiffs bad faith is not a prerequisite to the trial courts exercise of discretion to award fees holding that without a demonstration of bad faith on the part of the attorney in question sanctions pursuant to this statute are inappropriate holding that a bad faith claim is a tort