[of a contract] as a whole, and not specifically to the arbitration clause, e if it is “such as no man in his senses and not under delusion would make on the one hand, and as no honest or fair man would accept, on the other.” Tulowitzki v. Atl. Richfield Co., 396 A.2d 956, 960 (Del.1978) (internal quotation marks omitted). “[M]ere disparity between the bargaining power of parties to a contract will not support a finding of unconscionability.” Graham v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 565 A.2d 908, 912 (Del.1989). Rather, “[a] court must find that the party with superior bargaining power used it to take advantage of his weaker counterpart. For a contract clause to be unconscionable, its terms must be so one-sided as to be oppressive.” Id. (inte 473, 186 Cal.Rptr. 114, 126 (1982)
holding unconscionable a disclaimer of warranties under the uniform commercial code where there was allocation of commercial risks in a socially or economically unreasonable manner holding lease of property was a commercial transaction where the property was for commercial ranching but a residence was maintained on the property holding that a memorandum referring to the allocation of stock ownership did not satisfy  8319 of the uniform commercial code holding that the hospital was fraudulently joined because it did not meet the definition of seller as defined by mississippis product liability statute or under the uniform commercial code holding that the uniform commercial code specifically encompassed a software licensing agreement