of no moment. See id. (“[T]he fact that White’s drug charges were tried together is irrelevant to the determination of whether his actions constituted two criminal transactions.”). What matters is that Moody’s crimes were “committed sequentially, against different victims, at different times, and at different locations.” Ressler, 54 F.3d at 260; see also id. (describing criminal transactions as sequential where defendant had the choice to “cease and desist from further criminal activity” but instead chose to “initiate a new course of action and commit a separate offense”). Compare United States v. Godinez, 998 F.2d 471, 472 (7th Cir.1993) (“Ordering six poker players at the same game to empty their pockets is one criminal episode.”); United States v. Petty, 828 F.2d 2, 3 (8th Cir.1987) (<HOLDING>); Hudspeth, 42 F.3d at 1023 (7th Cir.1994) (en
holding that a conviction for florida armed robbery is a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act holding that defendants conviction for six counts of armed robbery based on his simultaneous robbery of six individuals at a restaurant should be counted as a single conviction holding that the defendants sentence for robbery was not inappropriate holding that violence is synonymous with force in affirming armed robbery conviction holding that a juvenile adjudication should not be counted as a prior conviction for apprendi purposes