litigation in court—costs which the School District and its amici take pains to emphasize are quite' substantial. See Appellees’ Supplemental Brief Regarding the Applicability of Mount Airy # 1, LLC v. Pennsylvania Department of Revenue, at 8-9; Brief of Amici Crestwood Area School District, et al., at 29 (enumerating appeal costs such as appraiser fees, expert witness fees, filing fees, and attorney fees). Further, the alleged political motivation, being an assertion of fact, contra Brief for Appellees at 37 n.20, must be accepted as true for present purposes. It should 'go without saying that the Uniformity Clause prohibits disparate treatment of sub-classifications of property in order to avoid political accountability. See generally Downingtown, 590 Pa. at 470, 913 A.2d at 201 (<HOLDING>). It bears emphasis that there is no
recognizing that individuals are generally not similarly situated when different decision makers are involved in the respective disciplinary action recognizing that tenured troopers are not similarly situated to probationary troopers recognizing that act and wetlands regulations are generally applicable to all similarly situated property owners and cannot be viewed as being directed solely at the plaintiffs recognizing the potential for discrimination by local officials among similarly situated property owners who are underrepresented in the general population recognizing general rule