chapter 7 petition are inconsistent with the established purpose of the Bankruptcy Code. After reviewing the three lines of cases, this Court concluded that if a debt- or, by way of the filing of a chapter 7 proceeding, was willing to surrender his or her non-exempt assets, regardless of the motive for the filing, the debtor nonetheless would be entitled to Chapter 7 protection. In re RIS Inv. Group, Inc., 298 B.R. 848, 852 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.2003), citing In re Padilla, at 1193. The Court is aware that there are numerous cases that have since been published on this issue in almost every Circuit. It appears that the Circuits continue to be split on the issue of bad faith and whether it constitutes cause to dismiss a chapter 7 bankruptcy. Compare U.S. v. Pedigo, 329 B.R. 47 (S.D.Ind.2005) (<HOLDING>) and In re Linehan, 326 B.R. 474
holding that a bad faith claim is a tort holding that lack of good faith is a valid basis to dismiss a chapter 7 case for cause under section 707a holding that although courts have inherent power to dismiss bad faith litigant  707a does not provide basis for dismissal on grounds of bad faith filing holding title company liable for bad faith holding that the list contained in 11usc  707a is not exhaustive such that bad faith may constitute cause for dismissal in a chapter 7 bankruptcy