R. vol. 13 at 914. The second call came at 1:13 p.m., and the caller said, “Hey, you guys still too scared to answer the phone? Don’t touch anything of mine. Trust me. You don’t want to.” Id. Further, beyond safety concerns, Agent Love had an objectively reasonable basis to deploy the numerous agents at the Redds’ house. The search required locating, sorting, and cataloging more than 800 Native American artifacts — a job requiring many personnel. And allowing other agents to help at the Redds’ house after completing their searches elsewhere was also objectively reasonable. Otherwise, it appears that agents could not have finished the search by day’s end, leaving the Redds unable to return to their house that day. Cf. Mountain Pure, LLC v. Roberts, 814 F.3d 928, 931, 933 (8th Cir. 2016) (<HOLDING>). Nor has the Estate offered any cases holding
holding that it was reasonable for thirtyfive law enforcement agents to search a 100000squarefoot bottling facility holding warrantless search of probationers home by law enforcement officer for investigatory purposes was reasonable when conditions of probation included a search term and search was supported by reasonable suspicion holding that the principal is liable for an agents acts committed within the scope of the agents employment holding monthsold information supported a warrant to search residence for child pornography noting law enforcement agents opinion that pedophiles rarely dispose of such material holding that law enforcement commission was a benefit of employment