Civil Procedure 23. Id. Second, class members who disagree with the course of a class action have available adequate procedures through which their individual interests can be protected, such as intervening pursuant to Rule 24, pursuing relief in a collateral proceeding in cases where the class representation has been inadequate, and opting out of the class where Rule 23(c)(2) is applicable. Id. Third, class actions could become judicially unmanageable if each member of the class could appeal separately orders in the litigation. Id. at 629. We think these reasons are just as applicable in this case, where the appellants seek to enforce a consent decree through the district court’s contempt power. See also In re Southeast Banking Corp., Secs. Litig., 51 F.3d 1003, 1004 (11th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). For the foregoing reasons, this appeal is
holding that an unnamed plaintiff that did not intervene nonetheless had standing to appeal a class action settlement holding that district court erred in awarding attorneys fees in civil rights action where plaintiff only recovered 1 in nominal damages holding that the court lacked jurisdiction to consider the appeal because it was filed before the final order awarding attorneys fees holding an unnamed class member who did not intervene in the action lacked standing to appeal district courts order awarding attorneys fees holding trial court erred in awarding attorneys fees to physicians in absence of any evidence of attorneys fees