amended ordinance contained the identical provision defining “sewage works” as “all facilities for collecting, transporting, pumping, treating, and disposing of sewage.” (emphasis added). Yet, the landowners complain the system that was actually constructed by the Southgate Board does not treat sewage, but merely drains liquids from septic tanks after the waste is treated within the septic tank. ¶ 11. In response, the Lowndes County Board of Supervisors argues the circuit court correctly held the Board of Supervisors has the power and authority to enact the ordinance at issue and to impose misdemeanor penalties for failure to comply with the ordinance. In support of this argument, the Board of Supervisors cites Lepre v. D’Iberville Water & Sewer Dist., 376 So.2d 191, 195 (Miss.1979) (<HOLDING>); Hutchinson v. City of Valdosta, 227 U.S. 303,
holding that the court has no independent authority to compel arbitration of a class claim holding that simply because claimants had diverted the entire run of the water at issue did not give them the ability to claim a right to all the water when they could not and had not put it to beneficial use holding the court had the authority to compel the property owner to connect to the water districts system and pay all back service charges which had accrued holding substantial completion had occurred because water district took possession of all the lines filled them with water and began using them to serve the customers of the water district holding the fact that an exempt owner who acquired legal title after date when liability for current taxes had accrued was the equitable owner did not make the exemption applicable