and establishes uniform procedural standards regarding reporting, disclosure, and fiduciary responsibility. Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. Mass., 471 U.S. 724, 732, 105 S.Ct. 2380, 85 L.Ed.2d 728 (1985) (citing 29 U.S.C. §§ 102131, 1051-86, 1101-14), overruled in part on other grounds by Kentucky Ass’n of Health Plans, Inc. v. Miller, 538 U.S. 329, 123 S.Ct. 1471, 155 L.Ed.2d 468 (2003). ERISA does not “regulate the substantive content of welfare-benefits plans.” Metro. Life, 471 U.S. at 732, 105 S.Ct. 2380. In particular, ERISA requires that every employee benefit plan provide notice to a beneficiary that a claim for benefits under the plan has been denied. 29 U.S.C. § 1133(1). The employee benefit plan must also set forth the specific reas 36, 2014 WL 3860049, at *11 (E.D.Wis. Aug. 6, 2014) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, “[a]dministrators may not
holding the alj is not required to address every piece of evidence but he must articulate some legitimate reason for his decision holding that this court need not address the merits of an argument raised for the first time on appeal holding that a plan administrator must address any reliable contrary evidence holding that where the bia has given reasoned consideration to the petition and made adequate findings it need not expressly parse or refute on the record each individual argument or piece of evidence holding that an administrator need not address each piece of evidence