v. Jackson, 209 F.3d 998, 1004 (7th Cir. 2000). Anchondo counters with a district court case, which held that net worth includes capital stock and goodwill. See Wisneski v. Nationwide Collections, 227 F.R.D. 259, 261 (E.D.Pa.2004). Neither party has cited a case on this issue from the Tenth Circuit, and I have not found one. The presiding judge will ultimately decide how to calculate net worth and whether any documents produced in response to this request are admissible. For now, it is sufficient that the documents may lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Importantly, request 22 does not require ACA to obtain a valuation of goodwill if none exists; it only requires ACA to produce any documents already in existence that include the valuation. Cf Sanders, 209 F.3d at 1003 (<HOLDING>). With this understanding, ACA must produce any
holding that a reason cannot be proved to be a pretext for discrimination  unless it is shown both that the reason was false and that discrimination was the real reason holding that a plaintiff is entitled to either statutory treble damages or punitive damages whichever is the greater holding that one reason for excluding goodwill is to avoid a mini trial on statutory damages because goodwill is difficult to quantify holding the statutory burden is on the defendant to prove he is incompetent to stand trial holding tcpa is remedial statute and that statutory damages are not punitive damages