court’s October 22, 2006, judgment did not dispose of the issue of child support. Specifically, the trial court stated: “The Court reserves the issue of child support pending the mother having surgery and being able to return to work. Upon the mother returning to work or after a reasonable period of time once she has regained the ability to work she shall be ordered to pay child support according to the guidelines set forth in Rule 32 [Ala. R. Jud. Admin.]” Because the judgment did not determine all the rights or liabilities of the parties but, instead, reserved the issue of child support pending the occurrence of a specific event, i.e., the mother’s having surgery and being able to return to work, the judgment is not final. See Reid v. Reid, 844 So.2d 1212, 1213-15 (Ala.Civ.App.2002) (<HOLDING>); and Tomlinson v. Tomlinson, 816 So.2d 57, 58
holding a judgment that stated that child support would be determined upon submission of cs41 forms by the parties to be nonfinal holding a judgment that reserved the issue of child support pending the mothers taking an examination  to obtain her nursing license to be nonfinal holding order was nonfinal where order reserved jurisdiction to determine integrallyrelated visitation and child support issues holding a judgment that reserved the issue of child support indefinitely and not pending the occurrence of a specific event to be final holding that the final judgment was entered without jurisdiction while a nonfinal appeal was still pending