or similar papers shall be served directly on the defendants by delivering or mailing the materials to them or their attorneys, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(b). SO ORDERED. 1 .The court recognizes that, although plaintiff is biologically male, it is painful to her to be referred to with a male pronoun. Therefore, because it does not appear that referring to Barrett as "she” will impair the clarity of this Order, I will refer to Barrett as "she.” See Farmer v. Perrill, 275 F.3d 958, 959 n. 1 (10th Cir.2001); Schwenk v. Hartford, 204 F.3d 1187, 1192 n. 1 (9th Cir.2000); Brown v. Zavaras, 63 F.3d 967, 968 n. 1 (10th Cir.1995) (stating practice of referring to litigants as the record suggests they prefer to be addressed); but see Kosilek v. Maloney, 221 F.Supp.2d 156, 158 n. 1 (D.Mass.2002) (<HOLDING>). 2 . Barrett indicates that her complaint is
holding plaintiffs burden was to show that the misconduct for which she was discharged was nearly identical to that engaged in by a male employee whom her employer retained internal quotation omitted holding that because the plaintiffs skills had deteriorated during the period she claims she was paid less than a male employee who performed equal work the plaintiff was not entitled to proceed further under the epa holding that allegations fell short of title vii liability where male plaintiff claimed that male coworker stood behind him and bumped into him while he mopped peeped at him in restroom and asked him to dance at christmas party recognizing that courts have referred to biologically male transsexuals as she but finding that clarity of the memorandum required use of male pronoun holding that there was substantial similarity between plaintiff and her male predecessors job