and adjectives asserted by counsel to ascertain the gravamen of a claim is similar to what courts already do in related contexts. See, e.g., Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc., 604 F.2d 737, 747 (2d Cir.1979) (rejecting the argument that the plaintiff had wrongfully pleaded a simple breach of contract claim as a fraud claim in order to take advantage of the latter’s longer statute of limitations, and explaining that the case “does not involve an[ ] attempt to dress up a contract claim in a fraud suit of clothes .... [the plaintiff] clearly alleges fraud that was extraneous to the contract, rather than a fraudulent nonperformance of the contract itself’); Ruling and Order [doc. # 62], GJN Advisors, Inc. v. Woolrich, Inc., No. 3:09CV338(MRK) (D.Conn. Jan. 20, 2010) at 2-4 (<HOLDING>). Another exception to the economic loss
holding that plaintiff stated a claim for breach of contract when it alleged the government failed to purchase insurance for plaintiff as agreed by contract recognizing that the elements of a claim for breach of contract are 1 existence of a valid contract and 2 breach of the terms of that contract holding that the plaintiff had not stated a claim for inducement to breach a contract where she had not alleged facts sufficient to show the existence of an enforceable underlying contract holding that although the plaintiff had successfully pleaded a breach of contract claim it had not adequately pleaded a violation of the connecticut unfair trade practices actwhich requires substantial aggravating circumstances attending the breachbecause when one puts the plaintiffs adjectives to the side and assesses the facts alleged  this is a case in which the plaintiff alleges only that the defendant committed an intentional breach of contract holding that jurys verdict for the defendant in a breach of contract action did not establish the absence of breach because the jury was instructed that it could find for the defendant if it concluded that the defendant had not breached the contract or if the defendant proved an affirmative defense