court erred, Salem takes the extreme position that a debtor has an absolute right to convert a Chapter 7 petition to a Chapter 13 petition at any time, even after the Chapter 7 proceeding is closed, and even though it is not just in another district, but is in another state and another circuit. Before we can reach the merits of this issue, we must decide whether it is properly before this court; that in turn depends on whether it was properly before the district court. “A court of appeals’ jurisdiction over a district court’s review of a bankruptcy court order can only be based on a proper exercise of the district court’s jurisdiction. Whether the district court had jurisdiction over any particular matter is a question of law, reviewable de novo.” In re Vlasek, 325 F.3d 9 ir.1981) (<HOLDING>). Normally, a party does not have an absolute
holding that there is no statutory authority in chapter 13 which grants a chapter 13 debtor independent standing to sue under the trustees  avoidance power holding that an order striking a standing trustees motion to convert a chapter 13 petition to a chapter 7 is interlocutory not final recognizing that a debt ors sequential filing of a chapter 7 petition and then a chapter 13 petition is the socalled chapter 20  holding that the conversion of a chapter 7 petition to a chapter 13 petition was not final until the plan itself was approved holding denial of motion to convert from chapter 11 to chapter 7 is interlocutory