with a disability to be hired or to remain in the position for which he was hired.’ 77 W. Va. C.S.R. 1, § 4.4, in part.” Skaggs v. Elk Run Coal Co., Inc., 198 W.Va. 51, 65, 479 S.E.2d 561, 575 (1996). 12 . The terms "handicap” and "disability” are interchangeable in our and most jurisdictions’ discrimination jurispruden 1, 383 S.E.2d 305 (1989) (rejecting the employer’s contention that a coal miner who could do his assigned work with continuous and substantial pain due to degenerative joint disease could not bring a claim, and holding that the protection of our disability discrimination law would not be denied to an employee simply because he had stoically endured the difficulties caused by his medical condition); Coffman v. W.Va. Bd. of Regents, 182 W.Va. 73, 386 S.E.2d 1 (1988) (<HOLDING>); Teets v. Eastern Associated Coal Corp.,
holding that it was error to dismiss complaint against individual defendants who had acted as agents of corporate trustee who could be held personally liable holding that plaintiff had not stated an equal protection claim where plaintiff had not alleged that the defendant treated him differently from anyone else who both had problems with alcohol and had been arrested holding that a woman who suffered back pain who was medically limited to light lifting and who had problems bending could make a claim holding that a plaintiff who did not have a direct contractual relationship with the defendant and who suffered injuries derivative of those realized by intermediate parties lacked standing to sue under rico holding that plaintiff who consulted an experienced attorney who failed to timely file the claim was nevertheless entitled to relief under  10