Code, See Tex.Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(6) (Vernon Supp.1997). Section 51.014(6) states that a person may appeal from an interlocutory order of a district court, county court at law, or county court that “denies a motion for summary judgment that is based in whole or in part upon a claim against or defense by a member of the electronic or print media ... arising under the free speech or free press clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, or Article 1, Section 8, of the Texas Constitution, or Chapter 73.” Id. Therefore, the only defendant entitled to bring an interlocutory appeal is HBO, a division of Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. See Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. v. Hebert, 916 S.W.2d 47, 48 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist .] 1996, no writ) (<HOLDING>); see also Act of May 25, 1993, 73rd Leg.,
holding that the act applies prospectively to complaints filed after its effective date holding that the commission on remand can set the effective date of a rate to be the effective date of the original commission activity holding that the date of discrimination is the date on which a decision not to hire a plaintiff becomes effective holding that under section 510146 only a defendant sued after effective date of statute could seek interlocutory review holding oneyear statute of limitations applies only to children born after the statutes effective date of september 1 1975