58, 83 S.Ct. 1052, 1053, 10 L.Ed.2d 191 (1963) (per curiam). This connection usually confers the immunity of the sovereign onto its officers when they act in their official capacities. 4 . Young is also intended for those cases in which the relief against the state official directly ends the violation of federal law, as opposed to cases in which that relief is intended indirectly to encourage compliance with federal law through deterrence or directly to meet third-party interests such as compensation. See Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64, 68, 106 S.Ct. 423, 426, 88 L.Ed.2d 371 (1985). 5 . The Court is satisfied that the Tax Injunction Act applies to actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See, e.g., Hawaiian Telephone Co. v. State Dep't of Labor, 691 F.2d 905, 909-910 (9th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Fair Assessment, 454 U.S. at 110-11, 102
holding that the tax injunction act barred review of a  1983 action to challenge an assessment to pay for sewer improvements holding federal injunction countermanding a state court injunction did not violate antiinjunction act holding that  1988 attorneys fees should not be awarded when the tax injunction act 28 usc  1341 bars the plaintiff from obtaining  1983 relief holding state is not a proper defendant under  1983 holding that  1983 is not an exception to the state tax injunction act