disqualification of [the] entire law firm simply because one member of [the] firm previously represented [a] client who is now an adversary of [a] client currently represented by [the] firm." 7 Am.Jur.2d Attorneys at Law § 198 (2005) (citing Kala v. Aluminum Smelting & Refining Co., Inc., 81 Ohio St.3d 1, 688 N.E.2d 258 (1998)). 9 . Plaintiffs might disagree with the phrase "heavily involved,” to the extent that Plaintiffs state that Wilson's involvement in Defendants' cases was limited to a "secretarial role.” Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Disqualify, p. 6, ¶ 11. However, even assuming her role as a paralegal would be more aptly termed secretarial, that would not make her any less "heavily involved” under the law. See e.g., Zimmerman, 270 Kan. at 822, 19 P.3d 784 (<HOLDING>). If the matters are substantially related, as
holding that plaintiff could state a claim for conversion of confidential information holding that a person violates  10b and rule 10b5 when he misappropriates confidential information  in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information holding that access to confidential information didnt transform janitorial staff into confidential employees under branti holding records did not qualify as exempt confidential commercial information under exemption 4 because the information was not actually confidential holding that the use of a chinese wall could not be used to screen a secretary when she possessed confidential information