additional useful information. She further argues that her statements to the officers investigating Bryan’s death were sufficient to waive her Fifth Amendment privilege, and that Keith could have filed a motion to compel her to answer deposition questions regarding the issue of her involvement, or lack of involvement, in Bryan’s death. Angelina’s arguments are not persuasive. Many of the interviews with investigating officers occurred shortly after Bryan’s death in December 2001, approximately four years prior to the deposition. During those years, a number of significant events occurred that might have altered Angelina’s testimony and certainly would have been proper subjects for inquiry during the deposition. Most significantly, Torre was 57 — 59, 43 S.Ct. 562, 67 L.Ed. 1023 (1923) (<HOLDING>). Notably, the district court precluded
holding that when a witnesss previous disclosure is not an actual admission of guilt or incriminating facts the witness subsequently may assert the privilege and decline to testify as to matters that might incriminate him holding that sixth amendment only requires that witness be brought to court not that he be required to take witness stand after refusing to testify and observing that it is irrelevant whether the witnesss refusal is grounded in a valid fifth amendment privilege an invalid privilege or something else entirely holding that article i section 19 of the missouri constitution requires that once a witness claims the privilege against selfinerimination afforded by that provision a rebuttable presumption arises that the witness answer might tend to incriminate him holding that in order to state a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel based on the failure to call a witness to testify the claimant must allege 1 the identity of the potential witness 2 that the witness was available to testify at trial 3 the substance of the witnesss testimony and 4 an explanation of how the omission of the testimony prejudiced the case holding that if testimony could incriminate the witness for other crimes he may properly assert the privilege