9 (3d Cir. 1992). 29 . Riley v. Kennedy, 553 U.S. 406, 419, 128 S.Ct. 1970, 170 L.Ed.2d 837 (2008). 30 . Michelson v. Citicorp Nat'l Servs., Inc., 138 F.3d 508, 513 (3d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). 31 . This Court and others have also recognized that a voluntary dismissal with prejudice constitutes a final order, thereby making interlocutory orders appealable. See, e.g., Blue v. D.C. Pub. Schs., 764 F.3d 11, 17 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (stating that ''[e]very- circuit permits a plaintiff, in at least some circumstances, voluntarily to dismiss remaining claims or remaining parties from an action as a way to conclude the whole case in the district court and ready it for appeal” and collecting cases); M&K Welding, Inc. v. Leasing Partners, LLC, 386 F.3d 361, 364 (1st Cir. 2004) (<HOLDING>); O’Boyle v. Jiffy Lube Int'l, Inc., 866 F.2d
holding that a plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of his claims with prejudice constituted a final order that was appealable holding dismissal for failure to comply with rule 8 was dismissal of entire action which was appealable final order holding that the parties stipulation of dismissal with prejudice was a final judgment holding that because the claims were dismissed with prejudice there was a final judgment for purposes of appellate review holding in res judicata context that  final judgment on the merits is synonymous with dismissal with prejudice 