taken no action to terminate the employee prior to the effective date of resignation, and it makes sense to consider the separation to be voluntary. By contrast, employer here fired claimant prior to the end of the notice period and did not pay her wages after the date that she left. The majority of courts in other states have ruled that an employee who is discharged before the effective date of her resignation has not left work voluntarily and is not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits on that basis. See Porter v. Fla. Unemp’t Appeals Comm’n, 1 So. 3d 1101, 1103-04 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2009) (listing cases). ¶ 14. Employer asserts that it did pay claimant wages to the end of the notice period, rendering her separation voluntary. See Gannett, 317 A.2d at 187 (<HOLDING>). Employer apparently is referring to the
holding injured employee who asked his employer for medical assistance and employer refused and employee then went to physician of his own choice employee could recover medical benefits holding that employee who resigned left voluntarily where employer accepted resignation told employee not to come to work anymore and paid employee through end of notice period holding employee resigned and was not constructively discharged because there was no evidence that employer deliberately created working conditions that led to her resignation holding that where employee gave notice to employer of injury and employer told employee that nothing could be done for him through workmans compensation employer had breached statute and was liable for medical treatment which was reasonable and necessary to restore employee to maximum usefulness holding that employee may claim contract created based on employer promise of severance pay to employee