That is a matter intimately connected with the efficacy of the bankruptcy proceeding. We add, moreover, that in the case of a liquidating plan of reorganization, there exists a substantial policy interest in favor of adhering to the general rule governing related to jurisdiction: the strong federal policy in favor of the expeditious liquidation of debtor corporations and the prompt distribution of available assets to creditors. See In re Holiday Mart, Inc., 715 F.2d 430, 435 (9th Cir.1983); In re Cartridge Television, Inc., 535 F.2d 1388, 1390 (2d Cir.1976). This policy is furthered by concentrating in a single forum any litigation that will impede or advance that goal. The existence vel non of related to jurisdiction must be determined case-by-case. See Pegasus Gold, 394 F.3d at 1194 (<HOLDING>). The language of the jurisdictional statute,
recognizing that federal removal jurisdiction is determined by the amount of damages a plaintiff seeks holding that related provisions should be read together recognizing that in certain circumstances inquiry notice may be determined as a matter of law holding issues related to subject matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time recognizing that postconfirmation related to jurisdiction should be determined with a certain flexibility