PER CURIAM. AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, the order of the Superior Court is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration in light of Lance v. Wyeth, 624 Pa. 231, 85 A.3d 434 (2014) (<HOLDING>). Jurisdiction
holding that where a defendant controlled the board of directors it is manifest then that there can be no expectation that the corporation would sue him and if it did it can hardly be said that the prosecution of the suit would be entrusted to proper hands holding that it is not holding a company which is responsible for tendering into the market a drug which it knows or should know is so dangerous that it should not be taken by anyone can be said to have violated its duty of care either in design or marketing holding that the extent of  control is a matter which should be explored in discovery and is not an issue which is amenable to a motion to dismiss holding that it is the use not marketing of firearms that is dangerous