In considering whether to terminate parental rights, the court may look at parental conduct both before and after the birth of the child. Avery v. State, 963 S.W.2d 550, 553 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1997, no pet.). Section D permits termination based upon only a single act or omission. In re R.D., 955 S.W.2d at 367. 2. Analysis Deferring to the trial court’s credibility determinations, Jordan caused several circumstances that physically and emotionally endangered R.A. by placing him and allowing him to remain in the sole care of Akin. First, she knew that Akin was violent, abusive, had endangered R.A. as a fetus when Akin physically abused her, and was often incarcerated for violent conduct. See In re J.M.M., 80 S.W.3d 232, 241-42 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). Second, Jordan knew Akin was a convicted sex
holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother placed children with physically abusive father holding evidence legally sufficient under sections d and e holding evidence legally and factually sufficient under sections d and e to terminate mothers parental rights based in part on evidence that mother endangered childs physical and emotional wellbeing by leaving child alone overnight with known cocaine abusers holding evidence insufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section c because mother made arrangements for adequate support of children evidence showed mother left children with father who maintained steady employment and adequately supported children mother knew that father would provide adequate support and mother left children pursuant to agreed divorce decree holding evidence legally and factually sufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section e for endangering physical wellbeing of child based in part on evidence that mother remained with physically abusive person while she was pregnant