(5th Cir.2000). 5 . Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir.1994) (en banc) (citing Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986)). 6 . See id. 7 . Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586, 106 S.Ct. 1348, 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986). 8 . Lujan v. Nat’l Wildlife Fed'n, 497 U.S. 871, 888, 110 S.Ct. 3177, 111 L.Ed.2d 695 (1990). 9 . Little, 37 F.3d at 1075 (quoting Davis v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc., 14 F.3d 1082, 1086 (5th Cir.1994)). 10 . McDonnell Douglas v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973). 11 . McCoy v. City of Shreveport, 492 F.3d 551, 556 (5th Cir.2007) (per curiam). 12 . Id. at 557. 13 . Id. 14 . Id. 15 . Tex. Dep’t of Cmty. Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253, 101 S.C 992) (<HOLDING>). 23 . Alvarado, 492 F.3d at 614. 24 . Id. 25 .
holding that reconsideration of the correctness of property division was barred on appeal from the judgment enforcing that division holding that the attorney generals decision not to provide representation to an employee is reviewable by the appellate division not by the law division where the actions against the employee are pending holding that there is no constitutional or statutory requirement that a defendants trial take place in a specific courtroom or division within a federal district and that the jury pool need not include anyone from the division in which the crime occurred holding res judicata applied to improper property division before holding parties were bound by their division agreement holding that a transfer was a demotion where there was testimony that few people transferred voluntarily from jobs in the plaintiffs prior division to jobs in the plaintiffs new division  everybody viewed a transfer from the plaintiffs new division to the prior division as a promotion and the two departments had different seniority systems