order is not a § 1447(c) remand order: [i]t seems evident that if an order of a district judge remanding a case is not insulated from review unless issued for a reason set forth in section 1447(c), i.e., a defect in removal procedure or a lack of subject matter jurisdiction, then an order of a magistrate judge that could not be issued pursuant to section 1447(c) because of the magistrate judge’s lack of authority to issue it is not insulated from review by section 1447(d). U.S. Healthcare, 159 F.3d at 146. The April 1999 remand order in CV-29 was not a § 1447(c) remand because the magistrate judge was not authorized to issue that dispositive order. Because § 1447(d) precludes review of only § 1477(c) remand orders, the district court was not precluded from revie , 225 (3d Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); Seedman v. United States Dist. Court, 837
holding that certification of a remand order divests federal court jurisdiction holding that filing of appeal to federal circuit divests this court of jurisdiction to consider motion to stay court order pending appeal holding that mere entry of a remand order divests a federal court of jurisdiction even where no certified copy of the order was mailed to a state court holding that the mailing of a certified copy of a remand order to a state court divests federal jurisdiction holding that the state court is revested with jurisdiction when a federal district court executes the remand order and mails a certified copy of the order to the state court