the statute of limitations begins to run on judgments for spousal support payments). We have long cautioned that having the statute of limitations begin running when the divorce judgment is entered may produce the absurd situation of “a right of action which may be barred before the cause of action has accrued.” Richter, 126 N.W.2d at 638 (quoting Simmons v. Simmons, 67 S.D. 145, 290 N.W. 319, 320 (1940)); see also 4, 698 (2004) (stating the statute of limitations does not begin to run until payment is due and holding former wife could not commence an action to enforce a divorce judgment awarding her a portion of former husband’s retirement benefits before he actually retired and the benefits became due); Patricia A.M. v. Eugene W.M., 24 Misc.3d 1012, 1015-16, 885 N.Y.S.2d 178 (2009) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 22] In In re Weber, the Montana Supreme
holding that retirement benefits are accrued benefits under erisa holding that the cause of action accrued on the date of sale holding that the plaintiffs claim that he was wrongfully denied a promotion prior to his retirement accrued on the date that he was finally denied that promotion  the date of his retirement at the lower rank holding former wifes cause of action accrued at the time of former husbands failure to pay her the portion of his retirement benefits to which she was entitled which was no earlier than the date of his actual retirement holding that military retirement benefits are current pay and thus significantly different than other retirement benefits