law, would themselves be fraudulent transfers.” Blackwell, 234 B.R. at 731 n. 7. We disagree. We look to Missouri law to define the scope and meaning of the disclaimer. Under Missouri law, a disclaimer has “the same effect with respect to the disclaimed transfer as though the disclaimant died immediately prior to the effective date of the transfer.” Mo. Rev. Stat. § 474.490.4. When a disclaimer is made, then, by act of law it relates back to the granting of the gift and treats the disclaimant as if he predeceased the donor. Accordingly, anything that devolves as a result of the disclaimer devolves as a matter of law from the donor to the beneficiary, not by a transfer from the disclaimant to the beneficiary. Accord Simpson v. Penner (In re Simpson), 36 F.3d 450, 452 (5th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Jones v. Atchison (In re Atchison), 925 F.2d
holding lis pendens analogous to injunction under florida law recognizing the ceiling present in the analogous texas statute holding under analogous texas law that under the relation back doctrine a beneficiary never possessed renounced property recognizing a cause of action under texas law for misappropriation holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied