is a security for UCC purposes); Haught v. Lante Corp., 1991 WL 148198, at *2-3; Medesco, Inc. v. LNS Int’l, Inc., 762 F.Supp. at 923; In re Domestic Fuel Corp., 70 B.R. at 462; In re Sandefer, 47 B.R. 133, 138 (Bankr.N.D.Ala.1985); Data Consultants, Inc. v. Traywick, 593 F.Supp. 447, 457 (D.Md.1983); Katz v. Abrams, 549 F.Supp. at 671; Dionisi v. DeCampli, 1991 WL 118185, at *3, amended by Dionisi v. DeCamp 1037, 1040-41 (La.Ct.App.1991) (finding that Chapter 8 of Louisiana’s UCC applies to an option contract between former bank president and majority stockholder of bank to repurchase a “maximum number of shares” of stock in connection with a contract of employment and that such stock is a security within the meaning of Chapter 8); Thomas v. Prewitt, 355 So.2d 657, 659-60 (Miss.1978) (<HOLDING>); Young v. Young, 240 Va. 57, 393 S.E.2d 398,
holding that the statute of frauds of chapter 8 of kansass ucc applies to the sale of 50 of banks stock holding that after the sale of stock former shareholders have no standing to file a claim against the corporation holding that chapter 8 of colorados ucc applied to the sale of shares in a corporation whose entire stock was held by one individual holding in action for breach of contract caused by wrongful foreclosure and sale of shares of stock plaintiff was entitled to recover the fair market value of the stock at the time of its sale holding that the statute of frauds found in chapter 8 of mississippis ucc applies to the sale of shares of stock in a corporation comprised of only twelve shareholders