party on a separate document following a decision by the court, and it serves to inform the parties that the court has reached a final decision. See Ellender v. Schweiker, 781 F.2d 314, 317 (2d Cir.1986). Bankruptcy Rule 9021 incorporates Rule 58 and likewise directs that “[e]very judgment entered in an adversary proceeding on a contested matter shall be set forth on a separate document.” As the bankruptcy court had determined the validity and amount of Gruntal’s claims following the trial of the adversary proceeding, and as the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction over the adversary proceeding survived the dismissal of Porges’ bankruptcy case, entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 58 and Bankruptcy Rule 9021 was appropriate. See Reid v. White Motor Corp., 886 F.2d 1462, 1468 (6th Cir.1989) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1080, 110 S.Ct. 1809,
holding rule 58 and bankruptcy rule 9021 applied in decision denying proofs of claim following adversary proceeding holding that state waived its immunity by filing proofs of claim holding that a notice of appeal filed in an adversary proceeding could not appeal the main proceeding holding that while an original bankruptcy proceeding where the state is not named as a defendant is not a suit an adversary proceeding directly against the state would be holding that state waived its eleventh amendment immunity by filing proofs of claim in bankruptcy proceedings