Rule 1-060(B) applies only to “final judgments.” Should the “default judgment” entered by the trial court be deemed a final judgment for purposes of Rule 1-060(B)? We hold that it should not for the simple reason that it did not include — and properly could not include — any provision for damages when it was entered. {19} Rule 1-055(B), as well as established case law, clearly states that the trial court must hold a hearing to determine the amount of any unliquidated damages before it may enter a default judgment. Armijo, 98 N.M. at 520, 650 P.2d at 42. Our Rule 1-055 is identical in this regard to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the federal cases agree with New Mexico on this proposition. Hagen v. Sisseton-Wahpeton Cmty. Coll., 205 F.3d 1040, 1042 (8th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>) (quoting Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d
holding that trial court must make entry of default prior to entry of default judgment and court may not make entry of default when there is no default in law or in fact holding that a default judgment was not void because the bankruptcy court that entered the judgment had proper jurisdiction over the party seeking relief holding that district courts order granting motion for default judgment was erroneous  because a default judgment cannot be entered until the amount of damages has been ascertained  holding that a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment precluded default judgment holding that the trial court was without authority to set aside entry of default on motion to set aside default judgment