by complaining he was eligible to go on a trip, but not specifically informing management that he believed his race was the reason why he was not included); Martinez v. Wilson County, No. 04-09-00233-CV, 2010 WL 114407, at *3 (Tex.App.-San Antonio Jan. 13, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (complaint of unfair treatment and harassment does not put the employer on notice that the complaint was based on sexual discrimination); see also Brown v. United Parcel Serv., Inc., 406 Fed.Appx. 837, 840 (5th Cir.2010) (“Magic words are not required, but protected opposition must at least alert an employer to the employee’s reasonable belief that unlawful discrimination is at issue.”); Harris-Childs v. Medco Health Solutions, Inc., 169 Fed.Appx. 913, 916 (5th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). Espar-za’s pleadings do not allege, and the
holding appellant produced no evidence that when she made her complaints to management she ever mentioned that she felt she was being treated unfairly due to her race or sex holding that defendant adequately indicated to officers that she sought assistance of counsel when she stated that she wanted to call her lawyer and officer testified that request was unambiguous holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired holding that a plaintiff could not show that she engaged in protected activity because she did not present evidence that she informed her employer that her complaints were based on race or age discrimination holding that trial court was not required to conclude that wife was disabled for alimony purposes where she testified about her disability and offered documentation of her social security disability benefits but where she produced no medical testimony and where other evidence indicated that she was otherwise active and did not stay in bed all day as she claimed