defendant’ ” were among the “several factors” relevant to the analysis. McDonald, 141 Md.App. at 380, 785 A.2d 836. In McDonald, the weapon was found on the floor of the car in which the defendant was riding, and the defendant was “the only person in the back seat of the car.” Id. He was also “the person closest to the weapon.” Id. Moreover, the police officer saw the defendant “reaching down to place something on the floorboard,” and observed “the butt of a handgun sticking out between appellant’s feet.” Id. We regarded the evidence as sufficient to support a finding that the defendant constructively possessed the handgun, and that he “put it on the floor in an attempt to hide it from the police.” Id. at 380, 785 A.2d 836. See also State v. Smith, 374 Md. 527, 550, 823 A.2d 664 (2003)(<HOLDING>). Cook v. State, 84 Md.App. 122, 578 A.2d 283
holding that once a vehicle has been lawfully stopped an officer may order the driver out of the vehicle without violating the fourth amendment holding that after making an arrest of the driver of a vehicle the police may search the passenger compartment of the vehicle holding the evidence insufficient to support a finding that the defendant a front seat passenger in a car owned by the driver possessed cocaine recovered from inside a box of pots and pans in the trunk of the vehicle holding the evidence was sufficient to support a finding that the lessee driver of a vehicle had knowingly transported a handgun recovered from the trunk of the vehicle in question holding automobile exeeption did not apply to warrantless search of vehicle where vehicle was not readily mobile because the vehicle was legally parked in parking lot occupants of vehicle were seated on a bench in the playground near the parking lot police officers surrounded the vehicle and the driver of the vehicle was handcuffed for safety purposes