... report, record or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness ... unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. We have made clear that “[f]or the purposes of Rule 803(6), ‘it is immaterial that the business record is maintained in a computer rather than in company books.’ ” Sea-Land Serv., Inc. v. Lozen Int’l, LLC, 285 F.3d 808, 819 (9th Cir.2002), quoting United States v. Catabran, 836 F.2d 453, 457 (9th Cir.1988). A logical extension on that principle is that evidence that has been compiled from a computer database is also admissible as a business record, provided it meets the criteria of Rule 803(6). Accord United States v. Fujii, 301 F.3d 535, 539 (7th Cir.2002) (<HOLDING>); Potamkin Cadillac Corp. v. B.R.I. Coverage
holding that documents that were not created by but that were received maintained and relied upon by a business are business records under  8036 holding that the debtors deposit of funds was not in the ordinary course of business and was for the purpose of creating a setoff right for the bank holding that computer data compiled in the ordinary course of business and presented in computer printouts prepared for trial is admissible under rule 8036 holding that once requirements of texrevid rule 806b were satisfied mechanical accuracy of computer and skill of operator went to weight and not admissibility of computer summary of business records holding that letters addressing dispute that was subject of litigation and that were written in anticipation of litigation did not fall under business record exception under rule 8036 of the federal rules of evidence and noting that it is wellestablished that one who prepares a document in anticipation of litigation is not acting in the regular course of business