actions imposed an impermissible “prior restraint” on her speech by denying the application for vanity plates before providing her notice and a hearing and by placing the burden on Perry to prove that the denial was improper. A prior restraint is a governmental order or action “forbidding certain communications when issued in advance of the time that such communications are to occur.” Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993) (quoting Melville B. NimmeR, NlMMER ON FREEDOM of Speech § 4.03, at 4-14 (1984)). In addition, a system of licensing that requires parties to obtain permits from the state before engaging in expression can be an unconstitutional prior restraint when state officials are allowed to exercise “unfette 30, 1540 (7th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). A nonpublic forum by definition is
holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials holding that a students private school tuition should be reimbursed where parent did not unilaterally place student in private school because the school district tacitly consented to the private school attendance before proposing a different placement holding that a school district owed the highest degree of care to a student on a school bus such that the district could be liable for the sexual abuse of the student by the school bus driver holding that school district policy requiring that students obtain the review and approval of school officials prior to distributing any written material violated free speech rights of students holding that school officials could prevent a student from distributing invitations in a public elementary school a nonpublic forum because the restraint was reasonable