needs of an unemancipated child to the extent of the parent’s financial ability!.]” Ibid, (alteration in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). “[I]t is also firmly established that child support is for the benefit of the children; therefore, the right to receive support belongs to the children, not the custodial parent.” Ibid, (citations omitted). A child’s right to support is, therefore, enforceable not only at the insistence of a custodial parent against a non-custodial parent, but at the child’s insistence as well. See Uniform Parentage Act, N.J.S.A. 9:17-45(a) and (b); and -53(c) (permitting an adult child to bring an action for paternity and support up to the age of twenty-three); and Sakovits v. Sakovits, 178 N.J.Super. 623, 631, 429 A.2d 1091 (Ch.Div.1981) (<HOLDING>). Enforcement by the child is not necessarily
recognizing a right to contribution recognizing that because parents have a constitutional right to direct their childrens education organization has standing to bring claim on behalf of parents recognizing that at common law a parents liability to support his child terminated at the parents death the terms of the support order could not be enforced against his estate unless provisions allowing for such enforcement were included in the order holding that a previously emancipated child should not forever  be estopped from seeking  contribution from his parents towards beginning or resuming his education holding that although a parents general duty to support his or her child ends when the child reaches twentyone years of age parents are free to enter into binding agreements to do so