So.2d 29, 48 (Fla.2000) (citation omitted) (citing Stein v. State, 632 So.2d 1361 (Fla.1994)). “The ‘cold’ element generally has been found wanting only for ‘heated’ murders of passion, in which the loss of emotional control is evident from the facts.... ” Walls, 641 So.2d at 387-88. Here the calm and deliberate nature of the defendants’ actions against the victims establish this element beyond any reasonable doubt. In this instance, the victims were bound and gagged for two hours and, thus, were unable to offer any resistance or provocation. More importantly, during this time the defendants had ample opportunity to calmly reflect upon their actions, following which they mutually decided to shoot the victims execution-style in the backs of the their heads. See Walls, 641 So.2d at 388 (<HOLDING>). With respect to the “calculated” prong,
holding executionstyle slaying  by its very nature is a cold crime holding that if a crime is broadly defined the court can look beyond the elements of the crime holding that the trial court erred by admitting a doctors testimony that a child victims description of a sexual crime was very believable holding that a court must only look to the statutory definition not the underlying circumstances of the crime to determine whether a given offense is by its nature a crime of violence for purposes of 18 usc  16 holding the crime of conspiracy is committed or not before the substantive crime begins