prohibits, or at least discourages, transfers among districts within a single state. As a preliminary matter, defendant is correct that the analysis prescribed for section 1404(a) transfers governs in spite of the fact that a case includes Title VII allegations. Title VII codifies a special venue provision “for purposes of sections 1404 and 1406 of title 28,” thus confirming the sections’ general applicability to Title VII cases. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3). While the special venue provision of Title VII broadens the range of appropriate venues available to a plaintiff, ample case law supports the basic proposition that the statute does not prohibit transfers away from a plaintiffs chosen forum. See, e.g., Ross v. Buckeye Cellulose Corp., 980 F.2d 648, 654, n. 13 (11th Cir.1993) (<HOLDING>); In re Horseshoe Entertainment, 337 F.3d 429,
holding tiaacref subject to title vii holding that title vii claim was subject to compulsory arbitration holding title vii subject to equitable tolling holding claims based on title vii subject to arbitration holding that title vii is subject to the transfer provisions of section 1404a