the district court’s docket sheet shows the application for turnover relief was denied on February 22, 1991. This docket sheet was omitted from the transcript. The bank also has filed a motion to supplement the record, requesting this Court to direct the district clerk to certify and transmit a supplemental transcript to the Clerk of the Court. The bank has attached a certified copy of the docket sheet to its motion to supplement the record. We will overrule both the motion to supplement the record and the motion for rehearing. It is well established that docket entries may not take the place of a separate order or judgment: Judgments and orders of courts of record to be effectual must be entered of record. Neither entries in the judge’s docket nor affidavits c 1980, orig. proceeding) (<HOLDING>). The supreme court has apparently relaxed the
holding that the oral rendition of an order in open court does not constitute entry of that order holding that oral rendition of judgment supported by the courts docket sheet was insufficient express specific written order is required holding that the rendition of a judgment is the act of the court in pronouncing the judgment accompanied by a notation on the trial docket and any later document setting out in greater detail the judgment merely confirms the docket entry holding that oral pronouncement and docket entry granting motion for new trial could not substitute for the written order required by texrcivp 329b since amended holding that the trial courts oral pronouncement must conform to the written judgment