an aggrieved party with standing to appeal. And insofar as the notice of appeal designates the August 2000 order granting Steinert's motion to dismiss the case, denying Winn's motion to condition dismissal on discovery and an attorney fee award, and stating that Winn "will have ample opportunity to establish entitlement to attorney fees,” Aplt.App. at 414, Gage states that he only challenges the order’s fee component. Interlocutory fee rulings that culminate in the final and appealable fee award are reviewable on appeal from that award. See Am. Soda, LLP v. U.S. Filter Wastewater Group, Inc., 428 F.3d 921, 924 (10th Cir.2005) (observing that an award of attorney fees is final and appealable when reduced to a sum certain); Montgomery v. City of Ardmore, 365 F.3d 926, 934 (10th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). 11 . In Miera v. Dairyland Ins. Co., 143 F.3d
holding that a notice of appeal that specifies the final judgment brings up for review all of the previous rulings and orders that led up to that final judgment holding that the final judgment was entered without jurisdiction while a nonfinal appeal was still pending recognizing that nonfinal orders may be revised at any time before a final judgment is entered holding that even an order that establishes entitlement to a judgment is not final unless it  actually enters or renders a judgment  or includes specific language of finality necessary for a judgment  to be considered final for purposes of an appeal recognizing that an appeal from a final judgment permits an attack against any nonfinal order or ruling leading up to it