most favorable to the nonmoving party, demonstrates that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Id. at 1195; Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). In a denaturalization proceeding, the government has a heavy burden of proof and must provide “clear, unequivocal, and convincing” evidence to justify the revocation. Schneiderman v. United States, 320 U.S. 118, 125, 63 S.Ct. 1333, 87 L.Ed. 1796 (1943) (internal quotations omitted). A revocation is justified if naturalization was illegally procured. Fedorenko v. United States, 449 U.S. 490, 506, 101 S.Ct. 737, 66 L.Ed.2d 686 (1981). Naturalization was illegally procured if an individual entered the country and obtained residence without a valid immigration visa. Id. at 518, 101 S.Ct. 737 (<HOLDING>). After World War II, the United States
holding that alien on student visa could not lawfully possess intent to be domiciled in the united states holding moot appeal from revocation of visa petition where immigrant subsequently obtained lpr status recognizing that an alien is ineligible for relief under  212c if he was not actually admissible at the time he received an adjustment of status holding that where an alien was ineligible for a visa as a matter of law his citizenship was illegally procured and subject to revocation holding ineligible for adjustment of status alien who was inadmissible due to reentry after prior removal