form warranty deed Mr. Clemons executed described the homestead property and named himself and “Ruth Clemons his wife” as grantees. But the deed contained a typewritten provision immediately following the property description, entitled “Addition to This Instrument,” which stated: The parties of the second part, W.C. Clemons Jr. and Ruth Clemons Witness that the death of the last surviving party of the second part [sic] shall be cause to convey and confirm and assign forever all that certain parcel of land described above to Joyce M. Thornton. Mr. Clemons died intestate some seven years later, survived by his widow and lineal descendants, including Joyce M. Thornton. By deed dated January 6, 2004, Mrs. Clemons purported to convey the property to herself and L 1121 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993) (<HOLDING>). We perceive no basis on which to disturb the
holding that all parts of the same statute dealing with the same subject are to be construed together as a whole    and individual expressions be accorded only that meaning which other modifying provisions and the clear intent and purpose of the act will permit internal citations omitted recognizing rule of statutory construction that statutes must be read as a whole and sections which are part of the same general statutory scheme must be construed together and each given effect if it can be done by any reasonable construction holding that if there is only one construction that will permit all parts of the deed to be given effect it should be followed holding that construction that neutralizes any provision of a contract should not be adopted if the contract can be construed to give effect to all provisions holding that if it is easier to dispose of an ineffectiveness claim on the ground of lack of sufficient prejudice which we expect will often be so that course should be followed