participated in a number of demonstrations against the authorities, and at one demonstration the police broke his arm. Ceraj argues that the IJ erred by failing to consider the cumulative impact of the mistreatment that Mr. Ceraj and his immediate family members suffered. Even assuming that all of the evidence Ceraj presented is true and credible, however, he cannot meet the burden of demonstrating that he was subjected to past persecution. Ceraj admitted in his testimony that he was specifically targeted by the authorities for mistreatment on only one occasion, when he listened to prohibited radio programs. His alleged mistreatment as part of a mass roundup of demonstrators in 1991 and 1997 does not amount to past persecution. See Pilica v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 941, 954 (6th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>). In Pilica, the court noted that “all of the
holding that a plaintiff who did not have a direct contractual relationship with the defendant and who suffered injuries derivative of those realized by intermediate parties lacked standing to sue under rico holding that the remedy in a prison conditions case must remedy actual injuries that have been identified by the court and suffered by the plaintiffs holding that an applicant who had been detained for 36 hours and suffered a beating by the police but without serious injury had not been persecuted holding that an asylum applicant had not suffered past persecution where she claimed to have been beaten and to have suffered some bodily injuries but she was not detained imprisoned tortured or sexually assaulted in any way holding that an albanian citizen who was jailed after participating in two demonstrations and suffered head injuries following a third demonstration did not demonstrate that he had been persecuted