the trial court." Utah R.App. P. M(a)(5)(A). No such citation was provided in this case. This failure is particularly significant because Parents are appealing two rulings that were not part of the permanency order. Our review of the record reveals that Parents never objected to discovery defects or denial of access to evidence before trial. "Under ordinary cireumstances, appellate courts will not consider an issue, including a constitutional argument, raised for the first time on appeal unless the trial court committed plain error." State v. Helmick, 2000 UT 70, ¶ 8, 9 P.3d 164; see also State v. Gibbons, 740 P.2d 1309, 1811 (Utah 1987). Here, Parents complained to the trial court about discovery issues during the trial; however, these complaints were voiced w 130 (Utah Ct.App.1997) (<HOLDING>). 3) Parents' Compliance with the Service Plan
holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review legal arguments not raised before the bia holding a general ruling by the trial court is insufficient to preserve a specific issue for appellate review holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review claims that have not been raised before the bia holding that appellant failed to preserve error because it did not present appellate complaint to trial court holding appellate court lacks jurisdiction if party does not preserve claim by first raising it before trial court