F.Supp.2d 800, 803 (N.D.Ill.2002) (finding § 502(a)(3) prohibited the plan from seeking to impose a trust on potential proceeds the injured party might recover in his action against the tortfea-sor stating that "[ajllowing suits of this nature would allow parties to circumvent the statute based simply on when they file the lawsuit, rather than the relief they desire”), and Primax Recoveries Inc. v. Carey, No. 00-cv-8337, 2002 WL 1968339, at *3 n. 5 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.23, 2002) (finding the request for an equitable lien against future settlement is barred by Great-West "because they are the entirely hypothetical fruit of a potential future settlement that does not yet exist and may never come into being at all”), with Primax Recoveries Inc. v. Duffy, 204 F.Supp.2d 1111, 1113 (N.D.Ill.2002)
holding that kentucky high school athletic associa tion qualified as agent of the state and as recipient of federal funds so as to be subject to title ix when association received dues from member schools which received federal funds holding that a bank which does no more than hold plan funds and generate reports is not a fiduciary holding that ncaa was not an indirect recipient of federal funds even though it received dues from schools that received federal funds holding that a college received federal funds where the funds were granted to its students as financial aid rather than directly to the college because the language of the section does not distinguish between direct and indirect receipt of federal funds holding greatwest bars a plan fiduciary seeking enforcement of a subrogation clause from settlement funds already received but does not bar a lien on specific funds yet to be received