contains a copy of an undated letter from him to the plan administrator making this designation. The issues presented here do not concern refund benefits. 2 . In 1999, the legislature increased the amount of the benefit from two-thirds to three-fourths. See Laws 1999 Ch.'50, § 5. 3 . The legislature amended this statute in 1998 to exclude from community property that which is "acquired after service of a petition for dissolution of marriage ... if the petition results in a decree of dissolution of marriage----” A.R.S. § 25-211. 4 . One might nevertheless argue that the non-employee spouse should receive a greater share of the retirement benefits in order to compensate for community contributions toward the death benefits. See Toth v. Toth, 190 Ariz. 218, 221, 946 P.2d 900, 903 (1997) (<HOLDING>). It is difficult to see how a value can be
holding that  2401b of the ftca can be equitably tolled holding that such a dismissal may provide grounds to equitably toll the statute of limitations for a second habeas petition holding that statute requires community properly to be divided equitably but not necessarily equally recognizing that rcw 1073090 can be equitably tolled but declining to toll it in the particular case holding statute of limitations should not be equitably tolled for taxpayer who filed a refund claim after the applicable statute of limitations