to exhaust his administrative remedies with respect to his claim, we are without jurisdiction to review it. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d); Claudio v. Holder, 601 F.3d 316, 318 (5th Cir.2010); Omari v. Holder, 562 F.3d 314, 318-23 (5th Cir.2009). Alternatively, we conclude that Vincente-Mas has abandoned his claim by failing to sufficiently brief it. Pursuant to Rule 28(a)(9)(A) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, an appellant’s argument must contain the reasons for the requested relief with citation to the authorities, statutes, and parts of the record upon which he relies. Vincente-Mas’s brief fails to meet this standard as it contains self-serving, conclusional assertions unsupported by legal authority or record citations. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). Vincente-Mas has also abandoned his claim
holding that arguments not briefed are abandoned holding that issues not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned holding that issues not briefed are deemed abandoned recognizing that arguments not briefed on appeal are waived holding issues not adequately briefed on appeal are abandoned