conduct falls within the discretionary function exception is a question of law, which we review de novo, applying the undisputed facts of the ease. See Buchanan v. United States, 915 F.2d 969, 970 (5th Cir.1990); Aragon v. United States, 146 F.3d 819, 823 (10th Cir.1998). The Suits in Admiralty Act (“SAA”), 46 U.S.C.A.App. §§ 741-752 (1975), serves as a waiver of sovereign immunity and authorizes suits against the government in admiralty cases where such claims could be brought against a private party. But, the SAA does not waive immunity for discretionary - acts of government agencies that fall within the discretionary function exception set forth in the Federal Tort Claims Act. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 2680(a) (1994); Baldassaro v. United States, 64 F.3d 206, 208 (5th Cir.1995). (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1207, 116 S.Ct. 1823,
holding that discretionary function exceptions applies to the saa holding all exceptions to discharge under  523a must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability exceptions under section 523a is preponderance of the evidence holding that the fourteenth amendment only applies to state action holding due regard must be given to the exceptions to the ftca