to go beyond the bounds of proper impeachment (see below) and questioned him about a position that appeared on prior versions of his CV, but was not listed in the most recent version. Specifically, Dr. Lloyd’s CV from October 2012 stated that he was a professor of medicine at the University of South Florida (USF). By January 2013, this CV entry now stated that his status as professor was “in process.” By March, any reference to being a professor at USF was removed entirely. Neither of the prior versions of the CV were offered into evidence or discussed during direct examination of Dr. Lloyd. While Dr. Lloyd had a reasonable explanation for the changes in his CV, the questions were nonetheless improper. Under section 90.608, Florida Statutes (2013), parties can impeach a w DCA 2010). (<HOLDING>). “The proper purposes of cross-examination
holding that counsel was ineffective for inter alia failing to impeach a witness with prior inconsistent statements holding that summary convictions of crimes involving dishonesty could be used to impeach the credibility of a witness holding that the state could not impeach an expert witness with evidence concerning past issues with the payment of taxes holding that government could not impeach witness with prior statement because he refused to answer any questions and thus gave no testimony in court with which the prior statement could be judged to be inconsistent holding that a lawyer forgoes workproduct protection for communications with an expert witness concerning the subject of the experts testimony even if the expert also plays a consulting role