However, the Commission’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. Oxendine v. TWL, Inc., 184 N.C. App. 162, 164, 645 S.E.2d 864, 865 (2007) (citation and quotations omitted). In this case, the Full Commission found that “[a]s a result of her chronic pain and physical restrictions resulting from her compensable January 10, 2000 injury and the aggravation and acceleration of her pre-existing non-disabling psychological condition due to her compensable injury. . .', Plaintiff has been incapable of working in any employment since June 28, 2000.” This finding is supported by the testimony of Dr. Denton and Mr. Mullen. As such, we may not substitute our own judgment for that of the Full Commission. See, e.g., Deese v. Champion Int’l Corp., 352 N.C. 109, 115, 530 S.E.2d 549, 552 (2000) (<HOLDING>) (citation, quotations, and alterations
holding that a challenge to the weight of the evidence is waived for failure to present the issue first to the trial court holding that appellate courts determine the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction based on a review of all of the evidence admitted at trial holding that the final determination of witness credibility and the weight to be accorded evidence is reserved to the appellate panel and it is not the task of an appellate court to weigh the evidence as found by the appellate panel holding that on appeal an appellate court does not have the right to weigh the evidence and decide the issue on the basis of its weight the courts duty goes no further than to determine whether the record contains any evidence tending to support the finding holding court unable to rule on issue when the record fails to include copies of the evidence needed to decide issue on appeal