to memorialize the terms of the lease assumption. Neither judicial review nor approval of the lease assumption agreement is required by the Bankruptcy Code or Rules. See In re Farley, No. 10-76019, 2011 WL 1304458 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y. April 6, 2011); see also In re Thompson, 440 B.R. 130, 132 (Bankr.W.D.Mich.2010). Section 365(p)(2)(B) also provides that a lease assumed by the chapter 7 debtor is a liability of the debtor and not of the estate. Under Section 362(h), also added by BAPCPA, if the lease is not timely assumed under Section 365(p)(2), the stay will be automatically terminated and the personal property at issue of either the estate, or of the debtor, sha of a personal property lease assumption agreement, In re Farley, No. 10-76019, 2011 WL 1304458 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y. April 6, 2011) (<HOLDING>). These decisions afforded the Court the
holding that the damage for tenancy at sufferance during the holdover period was the monthly rent under the lease versus the apartments fair market value because the lease contained a provision requiring lease payments beyond the lease term holding lease agreement that explicitly stated it was finance lease as defined in article 2a of ucc was finance lease even though lessee did not direct lessor to acquire goods or right to possession and use of goods from supplier holding that a closed case can be reopened to file a lease assumption agreement holding contract to be a mineral lease recognizing a latent ambiguity in a lease agreement