courts, in turn, exercise the powers delegated to them by the district courts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157. Under § 157, a bankruptcy court’s authority to enter a final order or judgment depends on whether a case is categorized as a core proceeding or non-core proceeding. See § 157(b)-(c). Bankruptcy courts have authority to enter final orders and judgments in “core proceedings arising under [Tjitle 11, or arising in a case under [Tjitle 11.” § 157(b)(1). Bankruptcy courts may also hear non-core proceedings that are “otherwise related to a case under [Tjitle 11,” but they may not enter final orders in these related non-core cases unless all parties consent. See § 157(c)(1). See also Wellness Int’l Network, Ltd. v. Sharif, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1932, 1941-42, 191 L.Ed.2d 911 (2015) (<HOLDING>) (citation and internal quotation marks
holding that in a noncore proceeding a bankruptcy court may enter final orders with the consent of all the parties to the proceeding holding that under article iii litigants may validly consent to adjudication by bankruptcy courts over claims governed by stern v marshall 564 us 462 503 131 sct 2594 180 led2d 475 2011ie claimsj designated for final adjudication in the bankruptcy court as a statutory matter but prohibited from proceeding in that way as a constitutional matter holding that a proceeding that by its nature could arise only in the context of a bankruptcy case is a core matter subject to the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court holding that the bankruptcy courts jurisdiction to adjudicate common law claims violated article iii without deciding the claims holding that bankruptcy court may issue proposed findings and conclusions in a core proceeding over which the bankruptcy court does not have constitutional authority