Club, Inc., 831 F.2d at 80. If these requirements are met, verified pleadings can be considered as summary judgment evidence. See RTC v. Starkey, 41 F.3d 1018, 1024 (5th Cir.1995). 64 . Melton v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, 114 F.3d 557, 559 (5th Cir.1997); Hibernia National Bank v. Carner, 997 F.2d 94, 98 (5th Cir.1993). The non-moving party must-set forth specific facts to establish that there is a genuine issue for trial, but where the evidential submissions lack probative value as to a genuine issue, summary judgment is appropriate. See Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. at 249, 106 S.Ct. at 2511; Melton v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Association, 114 F.3d at 559; and Hibernia National Bank v. Carner, 997 F.2d at 97-98. 65 . See King v. Dogan, 31 F.3d at 346, (<HOLDING>); Johnston v. City of Houston, 14 F.3d 1056,
holding that unsworn pleadings do not constitute proper summary judgment evidence holding that unverified pleadings and unauthenticated documents did not constitute proper summary judgment evidence holding that unverified complaints cannot be considered as evidence at the summary judgment stage holding that unauthenticated documents cannot be considered at summary judgment holding that unverified pleadings do not constitute competent summary judgment evidence