the conduct complained of and [are] so clearly foreshadowed by applicable direct authority as to leave no doubt in the mind of a reasonable officer that his conduct, if challenged on constitutional grounds, would be found wanting.” Id. A few admittedly novel opinions from other circuit or district courts are not enough to form the basis for a clearly established constitutional right in the Sixth Circuit. Id. Here, the district court correctly determined that the right to direct the education of one’s child was clearly established. Both the Supreme Court and this court have repeatedly recognized that parents have a fundamental right to raise their children, including directing their children’s education. See, e.g., Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 400, 43 S.Ct. 625, 67 L.Ed. 1042 (1923) (<HOLDING>); Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510,
recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children recognizing mutual duty of each parent to provide children with support and education suitable to the childrens circumstances holding that liberty includes the right of parents to establish a home and bring up children and to control the education of their own recognizing the right of the parent to give his children education suitable to their station in life holding that a school board policy prohibiting employees from sending their children to private schools interfered with employees constitutional right to control the education of their children