the Plaintiffs, Fidelity and/or Sov-ryn” and "[a]ll correspondence, memoranda, notes or other documents reflecting, concerning or evidencing any communication between ... [Comdata] and NTS regarding the negotiation, performance, nonperformance, breach and/or any aspect of the Agreements.” 5 . In the meantime, the Boyd parties had requested the United States District Court to abstain in deference to this proceeding or, in the alternative, to dismiss IPS’s complaint because the forum was not convenient. On May 12, 2000, the United States District Court filed an opinion and order granting the motion to abstain based on the reason 6 (1858). 8 . Tenn.Code Ann. § 23-3-105 (1994). 9 . Jackson v. State, 155 Tenn. 371, 376, 293 S.W. 539, 540 (1927); Johnson v. Patterson, 81 Tenn. at 649 (<HOLDING>). 10 . Hazlett v. Bryant, 192 Tenn. 251, 258,
holding client is not liable for actions of attorney who misled client as to the status of case holding that when an attorney represents multiple clients and a dispute between the attorney and one client later occurs there is a waiver of the privilege but only by the client asserting the liability recognizing special trust and confidence that must exist between attorney and client citations omitted holding that there are many transactions between attorney and client that have no element of confidence in them of which  the attorney is competent to testify holding that an attorney may only undertake to represent a new client against a former client  where there is no confidential information received from the former client that is in any way relevant to representation of the current client