indicated that Fakeye went to high school in Nigeria, where he lived as late as 2001, and (3) testimony from Fakeye where he stated that he came to the United States from another country. Based on the entire record before us, we are left with grave doubt as to whether the conviction was free from the substantial influence of the error. It is obvious that Fakeye’s ability to enter a guilty plea freely and voluntarily is called into question by his apparent ignorance of the deportation consequences of that plea. And because the evidence suggests that Fakeye is an immigrant, those consequences were particularly material. Thus, we hold that Fa-keye was harmed by the trial court’s failure to admonish him on the deportation consequences of his guilty plea. Compare Hwang, 130 S.W.3d at 501 (<HOLDING>) with Denton v. State, No. 2-02-467-CR, 2004 WL
holding record insufficient to support inference appellant knew consequences of his plea when record is silent about whether appellant was actually informed that a guilty plea could result in his deportation holding that the sanction of deportation is a collateral not direct consequence of a guilty plea holding that appellant was harmed by trial courts failure to admonish him of deportation consequences of his guilty plea where the record was silent about whether he was ever specifically informed that his guilty plea could result in deportation and record showed that appellant moved to the united states from korea holding statements during voir dire and oral motion in limine were merely opaque references to deportation but  silent about whether appellant was actually informed that a guilty plea could result in his deportation and insufficient to support inference appellant knew consequences of his plea holding that the defendants guilty plea was valid where the district court carefully questioned the defendant about whether he understood the consequences of his guilty plea