program. I sat in on group sessions and, in my opinion, it is exactly what Mr. White needs. Now, in terms of whether Mr. White is going to participate, that is up to Mr. White. But the option is there for him. It’s a great program and it would give him insight. It would minimize the risk to the community when he is released. And I think it would be a win/win for the community and for Mr. White. 3 . In briefly setting out the list of factors warranting an upward variance, the district court listed each of the statutory factors from § 3553(a), including the "need to provide the defendant with medical care or other corrective treatment in the most efficient and effective manner pursuant to 3553(a)(2)(D).” But see Tapia v. United States, -U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2382, 2391, 180 L.Ed.2d 357 (2011) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Tapia likewise made clear a sentencing
holding that 18 usc  3582a prevents a sentencing court from imposing or lengthening a prison term because the court thinks an offender will benefit from a prison treatment program holding that prison conditions are those aspects of prison life affecting the entire prison population holding that neither the ada nor the rehabilitation act applies to prison employment holding rehabilitation act applicable holding that sentencing court is prohibited from imposing or lengthening a prison term to promote an offenders rehabilitation