and feed herself. (Id.). Since leaving her position with Defendant, she has performed in jobs requiring her to move files and has assisted in moving a corporate division to another location. (Id. at 25, 28-29). The Eleventh Circuit has not squarely addressed whether an individual with a lifting restriction is disabled. See Reed v. Heil Co., 206 F.3d 1055, 1061 (11th Cir.2000). Most recently, the Court has stated that it “doubt[s] that a lifting limitation states a per se ADA disability.” Carr v. Publix Super Markets, Inc., 170 Fed.Appx. 57, 60 n. 3 (11 th Cir.2006). A number of the Circuit courts have held that lifting restrictions on the same scale as Plaintiffs restriction do not constitute an ADA disability. See Thompson v. Holy Family Hosp., 121 F.3d 537, 539-40 (9th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Williams v. Channel Master Satellite Sys.,
holding that restriction limiting continuous lifting of containers weighing fortyfour to fiftysix pounds does not substantially limit any major life activity holding that a lifting restriction of ten pounds did not constitute a physical impairment that substantially limited a major life activity holding as a matter of law that a permanent twentyfive pound lifting restriction does not constitute a significant restriction on ones ability to lift work or perform any other major life activity holding that a twentyfive pounds lifting restriction did not substantially limit any major life activities holding that a permanent lifting restriction of no more than twentyfive pounds on a continuous basis is not substantially limiting