Tae Woong Venture, Inc. v. Westward Seafoods, Inc., 963 P.2d 1055, 1065 n. 4 (Alaska 1998). 5 . Neal & Co., Inc. v. Association of Village Council Presidents Reg. Hous. Auth., 895 P.2d 497, 502 (Alaska 1995). 6 . Alaska Diversified Contractors, Inc. v. Lower Kuskokwim Sch. Dist., 778 P.2d 581, 584 (Alaska 1989). 7 . Hayes v. Charney, 693 P.2d 831, 834 (Alaska 1985) (quoting Doe v. State, 487 P.2d 47, 53 (Alaska 1971)). 8 . Maynard v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 902 P.2d 1328, 1329 n. 2 (Alaska 1995). 9 . Ostrow v. Higgins, 722 P.2d 936, 939 (Alaska 1986). 10 . - Municipality of Anchorage v. Anchorage Daily News, 794 P.2d 584, 588 (Alaska 1990). 11 . See Honig v. Students of the California Sch. for the Blind, 471 U.S. 148, 149, 105 S.Ct. 1820, 85 L.Ed.2d 114 (1985) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); University of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S.
holding that it was not fatal when the notice of appeal did not state that the transcript had been ordered when in actuality it had been ordered holding that where a district courts preliminary injunction preventing the appellant from terminating its agreement with the defendant had expired the appellants appeal of the district courts decision to grant that injunction was moot recognizing the inappropriateness of a preliminary injunction where credibility determinations must be made but granting a preliminary injunction because the legal and factual issues have been sufficiently illuminated holding appeal moot where tests that had been ordered under the preliminary injunction had already been car ried out holding plaintiffs appeal of the denial of a preliminary injunction moot where defendants directive no longer in effect