referrals to GEICO's underwriting department so that an insured’s rates may be adjusted when his policy comes up for review. GEICO also notes that Investigators sometimes process claim withdrawals when claimants decide to withdraw their claims. And they speak with law enforcement officials to discuss particular investigations and share information with other insurers. Even assuming that the administrative exemption would apply to an employee whose duties were primarily these, GEICO has pointed to nothing in the record that would support a conclusion that these responsibilities were any more than a minor part of the Investigators’ jobs, either in their importance or in the amount of the Investigators' time that they occupy. See Clark v. J.M. Benson Co., 789 F.2d 282, 286 (4th Cir.1986) (<HOLDING>); see also Schaefer v. Indiana Mich. Power Co.,
holding that plaintiff bears burden of production as well as persuasion holding that employer bears the full burden of persuasion for the facts requisite to an exemption holding that even if a state employees termination is properly appealed the employee bears the burden of persuasion that the alleged conduct did not occur recognizing that the burden of persuasion for a showing of prejudice was on the defendant holding that a debtor bears the burden of persuasion under  1325a