Melissa also regarded Susan as Madelyn’s parent as evidenced by, among other things, giving Susan a greeting card commemorating the “Birth of Our Baby,” and including her as “Momma,” and her parents as Madelyn’s grandparents, on Madelyn’s family tree. The allegations also indicate that Susan appeared “to the world” to be Madelyn’s parent. Madelyn shares Susan’s last name. Susan was named as a parent, along with Melissa, in birth announcements and in a church ceremony. Susan was named as a parent in Madelyn’s school and medical records, and was treated as a parent at Madelyn’s preschool. Taking Susan’s allegations as true and drawing all reasonable inferences in her favor, we hold that she has stated a claim for presumed parentage under RSA 168-B:3, 1(d). Cf. Elisa B., 117 R3d at 670 (<HOLDING>); Chatterjee, 280 P.3d at 296 (holding same-sex
holding that a samesex partner could not recover loss of consortium damages under a massachusetts statute for injuries  suffered by her partner even though samesex marriage was unlawful at the time the underlying tort occurred holding evidence insufficient to terminate mothers parental rights under section c because mother made arrangements for adequate support of children evidence showed mother left children with father who maintained steady employment and adequately supported children mother knew that father would provide adequate support and mother left children pursuant to agreed divorce decree holding that the bia correctly imputed a parents knowledge that she and her children were not eligible for entry to the united states to her children holding birth mothers samesex partner was a presumed mother    because she received the children into her home and openly held them out as her natural children holding wife unreasonably exposed neighbors children to danger because she invited the children over in spite of knowing her husband had molested children in the past