as we have noted, the crime charged in Mr. Burkholder’s indictment alleged a violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(E)(i). The Supreme Court has stated that this crime "has two principal elements: (i) knowing or intentional distribution [of a controlled substance], § 841(a)(1), and (ii) death caused by (‘resulting from’) the use of that drug, [§ 841(b)].” Burrage v. United States, — U.S. —, 134 S.Ct. 881, 887, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014). It is beyond peradventure that " ‘[r]esults from’ imposes ... a requirement of actual causality." Id. (emphasis added). Significantly, the Supreme Court did not indicate that a separate mens rea requirement attaches to the second element of this crime. Cf. Flores-Figueroa v. United States, 556 U.S. 646, 647, 129 S.Ct. 1886, 173 L.Ed.2d 853 (2009) (<HOLDING>). This reinforces the point that the question
holding that a texas assault statute requiring that the defendant intentionally knowingly or recklessly causes bodily injury to another  may be violated by the defendant so causing such injury by means other than the actual attempted or threatened use of physical force against the person of another and hence does not have such use of force as an element alteration in original holding that a defendants use of a persons name and social security number without permission constituted the use of a means of identification without lawful authority holding that trial court erred when it admitted outofcourt identification of defendant when the witness who made the identification was never asked about defendants identity at trial holding that 18 usc  1028aal which makes it an aggravated crime to knowingly transfer  without lawful authority a means of identification of another person requires proof that the defendant not only knowingly transferred something but that he knew it was a means of identification and that it belonged to another person holding that a federal criminal statute forbidding aggravated identity theft that enhances the criminal penalty when the offender knowingly transfers possesses or uses without lawful authority a means of identification of another person requires the government to show that the defendant knew that the means of identification he or she unlawfully transferred possessed or used in fact belonged to another person quoting 18 usc  1028aa1 internal quotation marks omitted