in the console of a vehicle was “carried” as to the driver of the vehicle. Id. at 677. In United States v. Fike, 82 F.3d 1315 (5th Cir.1996), the Fifth Circuit determined that a firearm located within reach under the driver’s seat was carried. Id. at 1328. In United States v. Riascos-Suarez, 73 F.3d 616 (6th Cir.1996) the court held that a firearm which is immediately available for use, meaning on the person or within reach is carried under the statute. The court considered a handgun protruding from the driver’s side console a “carry” under that standard. Id. at 623. Additionally, the First, Fourth, Seventh, and Tenth Circuits do not even require that the firearm be accessible in order to be “carried” in a vehicle. See United States v. Cleveland, 106 F.3d 1056, 1066 (1st Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Mitchell, 104 F.3d 649,
holding that a defendant carries a weapon by transporting it in a car within his reach but reserving the question of whether a firearm locked in the trunk would also be carried holding that guns located in trunk of car were carried under statute holding that the term carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding that carry includes driving a car with guns locked in the glove compartment or the trunk holding recovery of stolen guns from trunk of accuseds car was insufficient corroboration of testimony of accomplice who lived with accused and used his car