doubt the essential elements of the charged crime.” Id. III. DISCUSSION Jones argues that the quantity of crack he allegedly possessed, 7.07 grams, in combination with the other evidence presented at trial, is insufficient to support a conviction for possession with intent to distribute. “The essential elements of possession with the intent to distribute controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 are 1) knowledge, 2) possession, and 3) intent to distribute the controlled substances.” United States v. Delgado, 256 F.3d 264, 274 (5th Cir.2001). Possession of a small quantity of drugs consistent with personal use does not, without other evidence, raise an inference of intent to distribute. Turner v. United States, 396 U.S. 398, 423, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610 (1970) (<HOLDING>). However, “[t]he form and amount of crack
holding that a life sentence without parole for possession of 650 grams of cocaine base did not violate the eighth amendment holding possession of 1468 grams of a cocainesugar mixture not sufficient to infer that the possessor was distributing it holding that life sentence without parole for defendant convicted of possession with intent to distribute 1519 grams of cocaine does not violate the eighth amendment holding that evidence that the accused possessed 37 grams of crack was sufficient to prove he had the intent to distribute it holding defendants possession of fake ids was sufficient to infer his intent to defraud or deceive