officer or the insurer’s claims manager or superintendent.” See Fla. Stat. § 627.4137. Rather, Plaintiff relies on the “unique structure of surplus line insurers” and argues that Florida insurance law gives special consideration to this fact. (Dkt. 132, p. 11). Surplus line insurers may be exempt from certain statutory provisions. See Essex Ins. Co. v. Zota, 466 F.3d 981, 990 (11th Cir.2006) (certifying to the Florida Supreme Court, inter alia, “whether Fla. Stat. § 627.428 applies to surplus line insurers”); Chacin v. Generali Assicurazioni Generali Spa, 655 So.2d 1162, 1162 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (relying on the 4th DCA’s decision in English to hold that Fla. Stat. § 627.428 applies to surplus line insurers); English & Am. Ins. Co. v. Swain Groves, 218 So.2d 453, 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969) (<HOLDING>). Prior to this Motion, however, Plaintiffs
holding if a party does not follow the requirements of fla stat chapter 319 the party cannot later assert any ownership or lien interest in the car holding that fla stat  6270127 now  627428 ap plies to surplus line insurers holding because fla stat  48161 required sending of notice and process directly to the defendant under schlunk hague convention applies holding hague convention applies to service of foreign defendant pursuant to fla stat  48181 and 48161 holding that communication was initiated by the question well what is going to happen to me now