the same time he joined the murder conspiracy. Based on his evaluation of Downs, interviews, and his review of testimony in this case, Dr. Krop concluded that Downs had strong potential for rehabilitation. However, Dr. Krop also concluded that Downs was not suffering from extreme mental or emotional disturbance at the time of the murder, and that he did have the capacity to appreciate the criminality of his conduct. Downs, 572 So.2d at 898. We agree with the trial court that to the extent Downs offers additional facts not previously presented at the resentencing hearing, such facts are cumulative to the evidence presented by Downs during the resentencing proceeding and, therefore, are insufficient to warrant relief under Strickland. See Card v. State, 497 So.2d 1169, 1176-77 (Fla.1986) (<HOLDING>). The additional facts merely lend further
holding counsel ineffective for failing to investigate and present mitigating evidence holding that counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failure to present cumulative evidence holding that the failure to call certain witnesses was not ineffective assistance because witnesses already presented similar evidence and counsel is not required to present cumulative evidence holding that counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to pursue a meritless claim holding that counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise a meritless claim