security. For example, an unclassified summary, by definition, does not implicate national security because it is unclassified. Similarly, a lawyer for the designated entity who has the appropriate security clearance also does not implicate national security when viewing the classified material because, by definition, he or she has the appropriate security clearance. We recognize that disclosure may not always be possible. For example, an unclassified summary may not be possible because, in some cases, the subject matter itself may be classified and cannot be revealed without implicating national security. Depending on the circumstances, OFAC might have a legitimate interest in shielding the materials even from someone with the appropriate security clearance. See Ott, 827 F.2d at 477 (<HOLDING>); see also Gen. Dynamics, 181 S.Ct. at 1904
holding security interest in insurance premiums perfected by creation of security interest holding that the trustee could not avoid a security interest under section 549 when that security interest was authorized by the bankruptcy court holding that although a financing statement may be used to assist in the interpretation of the security agreement the financing statement does not create a security interest and cannot extend a security interest beyond what has been unambiguously described in a security agreement holding courts must look to the law of the state in which the security interest was created to determine if creditor retains a purchase money security interest despite refinancing holding in a different context that congress has a legitimate interest in authorizing the attorney general to invoke procedures designed to ensure that sensitive security information is not unnecessarily disseminated to anyone not involved in the surveillance operation in question whether or not she happens for unrelated reasons to enjoy security clearance