in contrast, is an inherent value not established by market forces, but based upon sentimental or personal value. Ford Motor Co., 125 S.W.3d at 799. The only evidence as to the fair market value of the house as received with the 625 square foot shortage was the appraisal that reflected a value greater than the value represented. Matheus offered no expert testimony that the fair market value of the house with the shortage was less than the value as represented to him. Matheus, himself, testified only as to the amount he pr r’s opinion that vehicle’s value was “worthless” as “unsafe for what I want it for” affirmatively showed opinion based on personal value to him and constituted no evidence); Pontiac v. Elliott, 775 S.W.2d 395, 398-99 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1989, writ denied) (<HOLDING>). Additionally, we note that the supreme court
holding that there was no evidence of market value where owners testimony affirmatively showed that it was based on personal value holding determination of property value in case to decide if assessed value was excessive is not a liquidated demand where only evidence of property value was the conclusory allegation of value in plaintiffs unsworn petition holding parties negotiated price of vehicle was evidence of market value as represented holding that testimony by the owners expert to the value of trees on appropriated property was properly admitted to rebut or impeach testimony by the appropriating agencys expert that the trees had no value in terms of their effect on the propertys market value holding owners testimony as to autos value as nothing as she could not depend on it or sell it referred to intrinsic value of vehicle to her and constituted no evidence