is reasonable only if the notice includes the date on which and the county in which the alleged crime or bad act occurred and the name of the alleged victim of the crime or bad act.” See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 37.07 § 3(g). The record reflects that the State provided notice to appellant of its intention to use evidence of prior convictions and extraneous offenses, and it supplemented its notice. The notices included the information required by Article 37.07, Section 3(g). Additionally, appellan im.App.1998) (analyzing former appellate rule and holding review not preserved unless defendant brings matters to trial court’s attention in a motion for new trial and trial court rules on the motion); Longoria v. State, 154 S.W.3d 747, 762 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.2004, pet. refd) (<HOLDING>). Thus, appellant has waived his contention
holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal holding that a party may not raise a claim on appeal that was not presented to the trial court holding appellants issue was rendered moot because appellant was given the opportunity to make a record in support of his motion for new trial and appellate court considered that record in disposing of only issue raised in the motion for new trial holding where record fails to establish whether and how appellant presented motion for new trial to the trial court it was not timely presented