to show fundamental differences between juvenile and adult minds,” and children “are more capable of change than are adults.” Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 68, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010); see also J.D.B. v. N. Carolina, — U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2394, 2403 n. 5, 180 L.Ed.2d 310 (2011). Studies show that children who commit sex offenses have relatively low recidivism rates and are more susceptible to treatment and rehabilitation than adult sex offenders. See Human Rights Watch, supra, at 69-70 (collecting sources); Nat’l Center on Sexual Behavior of Youth, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, What Research Shows About Adolescent Sex Offenders 1 (2003) (same); see also United States v. Juvenile, 347 F.3d 778, 789 n. 9 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>) (brackets in original)(internal quotation
holding that a private school specializing in treatment and education of juvenile sex offenders was not providing a function that is traditionally the exclusive province of the state holding experts twenty years of experience investigating and supervising sex offenders and her extensive and continuous training qualified her to testify as an expert on the issue of whether a convicted sex offender posed a continuing threat to society recognizing that virtually all of the studies show  that relatively few juvenile sex offenders are charged with a subsequent sex crime and sexual recidivism of juvenile sexual offenders posttreatment was very rare recognizing that a plaintiff can demonstrate that samesex harassment is because of sex by showing that the conduct was motivated by the coworkers sexual desire for persons of the same sex holding that the death penalty was categorically prohibited for juvenile offenders