to her about the size of his penis, and told others in his office that he was talking to Costilla. Costilla met with Sloan, told her of the telephone conversation, and told her that Acosta’s harassment had continued nearly unabated. Sloan called Acosta’s new supervisor and informed him of Acosta’s behavior. In addition to a full investigation, Sloan recommended that Acosta not be allowed to work with Costilla. The supervisor told Sloan that Acosta would be suspended. It is unclear if Acosta was suspended at that time. The harassment finally stopped in June 1995 when a high-ranking DES commissioner sent a letter to the federal regional administrator in Chicago insisting that Acosta have no further contact with Costilla and that the federal office condu 252, 675 A.2d 684, 692 (1996) (<HOLDING>); 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(e). These eases are
holding employer could be hable for sexual harassment of employees by nonemployees including employers customers holding that an employer must remedy situation of sexual harassment holding school district strictly hable for sexual harassment by its employees holding school district hable for teachers sexual harassment of student only upon knowing failure to act holding employer may be hable for sexual harassment of employee by independent contractor