Gdn. of Miranda Herndon c/o David Griffin, Esq. 1800 30th Street Bakersfield, CA 93301 Herndon alleges that the correct address for Herndon’s attorney should have been: Judith Gail Herndon, as Guardian ad Li-tem for Miranda Leann Herndon, a Minor c/o David Griffin, Esq. Byrum, Holland & Griffin 1800 30th Street, Fourth Floor Bakersfield, CA 93301-1920 In the present ease, the address was only missing the floor number, law firm name and the last four digits of the zip code. The bankruptcy court correctly concluded that any defect in the address was harmless; Herndon’s attorney did receive notice of De la Cruz’s discharge on March 5, 1993, which was sent to the same address as the notice of the meeting of creditors. The bankruptcy court held that the presumption was not rebutt Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>); In re Compton, 891 F.2d 1180, 1184 (5th
holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability actions is the preponderance of the evidence standard holding that the standard of proof for dischargeability exceptions under section 523a is preponderance of the evidence holding that the party challenging the dischargeability of a debt bears the burden of proving the debt nondischargeable by a preponderance of the evidence holding that motion to extend time period for filing dischargeability complaint must be made before the running of that period and that court lacks discretion to grant late filed motion to extend time to file dischargeability complaint holding creditors actual notice of chapter 7 case in ample time to prepare and timely file the necessary request for determination of dischargeability bars them from challenging the dischargeability of their claim 15 months after bar date