actions, it is equally if not more likely that problems were not recognized or not reported to Chrysler’s secretary. The statute, after all, is a remedial consumer protection act designed to protect those who do not or cannot complain. The mere fact a mistake occurs does not automatically render the creditor’s procedures not reasonably adapted to avoid the error. That the legislature saw fit to create the defense means it must cover some mistakes. Chrysler’s procedures, however, are not “reasonably adapted” because far too many lawsuits will fall through the cracks; to mix metaphors, Chrysler left the floodgates open when its attorney handed his secretary a USPS directory that was too rudimentary to account for two-county cities or rural residents. Cfi Martinez, 867 F.Supp. at 1503 (<HOLDING>). It is not the purpose of the bona fide error
holding bona fide error defense barred claim for fdpca violation which arose from mistake of law holding defendants bona fide error defense conclusively failed defendant could not have maintained procedures reasonably adapted to avoid the venue violation which occurred because it routinely applied the wrong standard in determining where to file suit recognizing that if the plaintiff files suit in a county where venue does not lie the plaintiff waives the right to choose and the defendant may have the suit transferred to a proper venue holding that notice of appeal filed under the wrong docket number is a bona fide attempt to invoke appellate jurisdiction and that the court of appeals dismissal was improper recognizing that if a creditors claim is subject to a bona fide dispute that creditor lacks standing to file an involuntary petition