opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Benito Sanchez-Garcia, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for cancellation of removal and voluntary departure. We have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no error in the Board’s conclusion that Sanchez-Garcia is statutorily ineligible for both forms of relief. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(c) (2012) (providing that an alien shall not be permitted to “depart voluntarily ... if the alien was previously permitted to so depart after having been found inadmissible under [8 U.S.C. § ]• 1182(a)(6)(A) [2012])”; Garcia v. Holder, 732 F.3d 308 (4th Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>). We therefore deny the petition for review for
holding that boards ruling that aliens continuous physical presence terminated when he voluntarily departed country was a reasonable interpretation of 8 usc  1229b 2012 holding that under a due weight deference standard a more reasonable interpretation overcomes an agency interpretation holding petitioner cannot claim he was denied right to assistance of counsel when he knowingly and voluntarily decided to represent himself holding that a person must request a reasonable accommodation before he has been terminated he cannot wait until he is terminated and then months later  request reinstatement and demand a reasonable accommodation holding erisa plan interpretation is simply one of contract interpretation