v. Howard, 311 Ga. App. 217, 221 (1) (715 SE2d 704) (2011) (punctuation andemphasis omitted); accord Carrier Corp. v. Rollins, Inc., 316 Ga.App. 630, 635 (2) (730 SE2d 103) (2012). 5 Evans v. Dep’t of Transp., 331 Ga. App. 313, 321 (3) (771 SE2d 20) (2015) (punctuation omitted). 6 Boston Men’s Health Ctr., 311 Ga. App. at 221 (1) (punctuation omitted). 7 (Emphasis supplied.) 8 247 Ga. App. 763 (544 SE2d 747) (2001). 9 See id. at 763. 10 See id. 11 See id. 12 Id. at 764-65. 13 253 Ga. 150 (317 SE2d 542) (1984). 14 See McDonald, 247 Ga. App. at 765 (1) (a). 15 Id. at 765-66 (1) (a) (punctuation omitted) (quoting Whitehead, 253 Ga. at 151-52 (1)). 16 Id. at 766 (1) (a). 17 Id. 18 See Whitehead, 253 Ga. at 151-52 (1). 19 See Lewis v. Van Anda, 282 Ga. 763, 767-68 (5) (653 SE2d 708) (2007) (<HOLDING>); Second Cont’l, Inc. v. Atlanta E-Z Builders,
holding appellate courts must consider the trial courts jury charge as a whole holding that trial courts jury charge did not amount to reversible error given that plaintiff failed to show she was prejudiced by inapplicable portion of trial courts charge holding that although appellant filed a proposed jury charge appellant did not preserve error because trial court did not endorse proposed charge and appellant did not call trial courts attention to the portions of the proposed charge that were complained about on appeal holding that although portion of trial courts jury charge was inapplicable any error in providing it was harmless in light of the fact that charge considered as a whole was not likely to confuse or mislead the jury holding that because trial court actually gave part of a jury charge that appellant claimed was improperly omitted and because remainder of courts charge adequately defined one of the legal terms at issue the courts jury charge taken as a whole was not misleading and did not constitute reversible error