and providing notification and information to the petitioner. Section 40-6A-307(b)(l)-(6). It does not include the additional advocacy functions contemplated in establishing and enforcing paternity and child support obligations under Section 27-2-27(A)(4). {18} We are also guided by the definitional language of UIFSA. See Henderson v. City of Tucumcari, 2005-NMCA-077, ¶ 9, 137 N.M. 709, 114 P.3d 389 (“Our starting point is the plain language of the statute.”). Section 40-6A-102(22) defines a “support enforcement agency” as an agency authorized to take certain actions. An agency is included in the definition if it has the power to perform any, not all, of the acts associated with child support enforcement. See Wilson v. Denver, 1998-NMSC-016, ¶ 17, 125 N.M. 308, 961 P.2d 153 (<HOLDING>). We glean from the definition that UIFSA
holding the word individuals is not the equivalent of the dictionary acts use of the word persons holding that use of word may in utah rule of civil procedure 49 indicates grant of discretion to trial court holding that the use of the word or in a statute indicates that any of the listed alternative methods will suffice holding that a states use of the word shall is mandatory language holding use of word may generally indicates permissive rather than mandatory intent