inclusive of costs.” At the time of the offer, plaintiff had incurred $762 in costs and $5,790 in attorney fees. Plaintiff did not accept the offer of judgment. Defendant then moved for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiffs failure to file a police report of his injury within the time required by the statute precluded his claim. The trial court granted the motion, and we affirmed the ensuing judgment of the trial court without opinion. Wilson v. Tri-County Metro. Trans. Dist., 200 Or App 291, 114 P3d 1157 (2005). On review, the Supreme Court ultimately determined that plaintiffs failure to provide notice to the police of his accident did not bar his claim and remanded the case for further proceedings. Wilson v. Tri-County Metro. Trans. Dist., 343 Or 1, 16, 161 P3d 933 (2007) (<HOLDING>). On remand, plaintiff prevailed after a jury
recognizing that a parental consent requirement is more intrusive than a parental notification requirement holding that the legislature imposed a requirement implicitly rather than by means of statutory language expressly stating the requirement holding exhaustion requirement void and unenforceable because not included in a statutory list of permissible exclusions holding the statutory notification requirement unenforceable holding that notice was not constitutionally adequate where the clearcut statutory procedures for notification were not followed