612-617, aqd repealing article 593.1. These articles more closely track the language of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. 6 . Another prerequisite to class certification is that "[o]ne or more members of a class, who will fairly insure the adequate representation of all members, may sue or be sued in a class action on behalf of all members.” La. C.C.P. art. 592. We do not reach the issue of whether this requirement has been met. 7 . The comments also note that "[t]he only similarity between the joint obligation of AngloAmeri-can law and the joint obligation of Louisiana (the conjoint obligation of the civil law) is the name. See Preliminary Statement to Book I, Title III, Chapter 1.” La. C.C.P. art. 591, Comment (b). 8 . See Vizier v. Howard, 165 So.2d 655 (La.App. 1st Cir.1964) (<HOLDING>); Verdin v. Thomas, 191 So.2d 646 (La.App. 1st
holding that the claims of the class representative and class members must be based on the same legal or remedial theory holding that the right of all putative members of a proposed class in an action filed pursuant to kansass class action rule of civil procedure to file a separate action is preserved pending the determination of whether the initial case shall be maintained as a class action holding that to maintain a class action the existence of the class must be pleaded and the limits of the class must be defined with some specificity holding that putative class members are not parties to an action prior to class certification holding that for a class action to be maintained all class members must have a common and undivided interest in the property or matter involved