the Eleventh Amendment analysis. See, e.g., Barde v. Board of Trustees of Regional Comm. Colleges, 207 Conn. 59, 64, 539 A.2d 1000 (1988) (“Although the named defendant here is the board of trustees of regional community colleges, these colleges are state public institutions and the real party in interest is the state.”); Rogan v. Board of Trustees, 178 Conn. 579, 582-84, 424 A.2d 274 (1979) (board of trustees of state colleges is entitled to sovereign immunity); Hynes v. Southern Conn. State Univ., 2001 WL 822330, * 1 (Conn.Super. June 15, 2001) (SCSU is entitled to sovereign immunity); Dery v. Southern Conn. State Univ., 1998 WL 738060 (Conn.Super. Oct. 8, 1998) (same); see also Narumanchi v. Board of Trustees of the Conn. State Univ., 1986 WL 15753, * 5-6 (D.Conn. Oct. 6, 1986) (<HOLDING>). Significant control is retained by the
holding that the csu board of trustees and individual trustees sued in their official capacity are a political arm of the state and as such are immune from suit holding state of north carolina and state official sued in their official capacity are immune from  1983 and  1985 actions in federal court holding that punitive damages are not recoverable against a state official sued in his or her official capacity holding that members of the city council in their official capacity are not immune from a section 1983 suit against the municipality for deprivation of liberty interest in reputation without due process holding that state and its officers sued in their official capacity for damages are not persons suable under  1983