also Myers, 2011 UT 65, 1 24, 266 P.3d 806 ("[A] marriage-like cohabitation relationship is difficult to define with a hard-and-fast list of prerequisites."). As a result, the burden of establishing that cohabitation has occurred is on the payor spouse. See Utah Code Ann. § 30-8-5(10) (stating that "alimony to a former spouse terminates upon establishment by the party paying alimony that the former spouse is cohabitating with another person") (emphasis added). Here, the trial court concluded that Husband had met his burden. We agree. I. We Accept the Trial Court's Factual Findings. { 11 There is some debate among the parties about whether Wife properly marshaled the evidence supporting the factual findings that she resists. See generally Chen v. Stew-ort, 2004 UT 82, 177, 100 P.8d 1177 (<HOLDING>). However, Wife concedes that her challenge is
holding that the trial courts putting its findings on the record at the conclusion of the states case was sufficient to satisfy  152538 because that section does not specifically limit the time within which the court must state the findings holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence holding that findings of fact are conclusive if supported by clear and convincing competent evidence even where the evidence might support contrary findings holding that appellants must provide a precisely focused summary of all the evidence supporting the findings they challenge  and then convince us that the trial court erred in the assessment of that evidence to its findings holding the findings of fact required to support an alimony award are sufficient if findings of fact have been made on the ultimate facts at issue in the case and the findings of fact show the trial court properly applied the law in the case