fall within the scope of ERISA, but then be excluded from ERISA coverage because it is a governmental plan.”). Likewise, in Lovelace, this Court held that a health insurance plan established by the Wilmington City Public School System qualified as an employee welfare benefit plan under ERISA but nevertheless fell within ERISA’s governmental plan exclusion. Lovelace, 775 F.Supp. at 229-30 (“ERISA regulates employee benefit plans, such as the plan at issue — [bu cv-519, 2013 WL 4832066, at *3 (S.D.Ohio Sept. 10, 2013) (“Since [plaintiff] is an employee of the State of Ohio and her insurance plan was established and maintained by the State of Ohio, ERISA is not applicable.”); Robert v. Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Brown Cnty., Kan., No. 08-2150-EFM, 2011 WL 836729, at *9 (D.Kan. Mar. 3, 2011) (<HOLDING>); Kirkpatrick v. Merit Behavioral Care Corp.,
holding that healthcare plan established by the state of vermont for eligible employees qualified for governmental plan exclusion holding that disability plan established by state university for benefit of employees qualified for governmental plan exclusion holding that a payment is under the plan when the debt is provided for in the plan holding that county governments healthcare plan qualified for governmental plan exclusion holding that employee benefit plan sponsored by two participating employers  cook county and the cook county forest preserve district  qualified for governmental plan exclusion