927 (“In applying the categorical approach, we have not yet had occasion to determine the elements of the generic federal offense of manslaughter; however, we have said that the generic federal offense of manslaughter requires at least a- mens rea of recklessness.”) ; Roblero-Ramirez, 716 F.3d at 1126 (“We need not decide at this time whether generic manslaughter requires purposeful or intentional behavior ... or mere recklessness.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)). Other circuits, however, have decided the requisite mens rea for generic federal manslaughter. United States v. Armijo, 651 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir.2011) (finding generic federal manslaughter requires “purposeful or intentional” conduct); United States v. Hernandez-Rojas, 426 Fed.Appx. 67, 70 (3d Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Peterson, 629 F.3d 432,
holding insufficient the plaintiffs generic allegations holding generic federal manslaughter requires a recklessness mental state holding that emotional distress requires a showing of either physical symptoms or mental illness recognizing that the longstanding public policy against federal court interference with state court proceedings generally requires federal courts to abstain from involvement in state criminal proceedings holding that a conviction under a texas robbery statute qualifies as generic robbery be cause its elements substantially correspond to the basic elements of the generic offense in that they both involve theft and immediate danger to a person