for an award of compensation to Petitioner, together with reasonable attorney fees, and other costs. The Clerk of the United States Court of Federal Claims will enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . This Memorandum Opinion and Final Judgment are issued on an expedited basis to facilitate any appellate review that respondent ("the Government”) may wish to pursue. See House Report 99-908, 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 6344 ("House Report”) (awards are to be "made to vaccine-injured persons quickly, easily and with certainty and generosity"). 2 . Unfortunately, the court previously has had to correct arbitrary and capricious actions of the Special Master that have prejudiced other Vaccine Act petitioners. See Campbell v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 69 Fed.Cl. 775 (2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Cook v. Sec’y of Health and Human
holding that the special masters refusal to hold an evidentiary hearing rejection of affidavits and medical reports proffered by peti tioner but sua sponte introducing her own independent research into the record was fundamentally unfair and the special masters rulings were either inadequately explained or arbitrary and capricious holding no evidentiary hearing was required where the affidavits of the defendant and his wife were directly contradicted by the defendants sworn testimony during the plea hearing holding that this court has unambiguously explained that special masters are expected to consider the credibility of expert witnesses in evaluating petitions for compensation under the vaccine act holding that reviewing court should accord deference to special masters decision and may not substitute its own judgment for that of the special master holding that the magistrates recommended order terminating temporary supervision and placing the child in permanent guardianship was not supported by competent substantial evidence because the magistrate failed to hold an evidentiary hearing and that the failure to hold an evidentiary hearing violated the fathers due process rights