Island, “he was ‘treated,’ for constitutional purposes, ‘as if stopped at the border.’ And that made all the difference.” Id. at 693, 121 S.Ct. 2491. Mezei involved an alien who, after living in the United States for twenty-five years, went abroad for nineteen months. 345 U.S. at 208, 73 S.Ct. 625. Upon his return he was temporarily excluded from the United States by an immigration inspector. Id. On the basis of confidential information and without a hearing, the Attorney General made the exclusion permanent. Id. Because no other country would accept him and the exclusion order barred him from entering the United States, Mezei faced the prospect of indefinite detention at Ellis Island. Id. at 208-09, 73 S.Ct. 625. Like Mezei, Borrero has not effected an entry in Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>); Barrera-Echavarria v. Rison, 44 F.3d 1441,
holding that almendareztorres remains the law after apprendi holding that mezei remains good law after zadvydas thus annual parole review pursuant to the cuban review plan satisfies due process holding that when the state offers collateral review due process does not dictate the exact form of such review holding that almendareztorres remains good law after apprendi holding that there is no due process right to appellate review