accurate up to the date that the contractor and the Government contracting officer (“GCO”) agree on the price of the contract. See 10 U.S.C. § 2306a(d)(l)(B) (under TINA “defective cost or pricing data are cost or pricing data which as of the date of agreement on the price of the contract ... were inaccurate, incomplete, or noncurrent.”) (emphasis added); Conrac Corp., 74-1 BCA If 10,605 at 50,292 (1974) (specifically recognizing that under TINA a Government contractor has “no duty to disclose data that first came into its possession after the date [the contractor certifies the correctness of the contract price] and prior to the date of contract execution.”) ; Paceco, Inc., 73-2 BCA II 10,119 at 47,560 (1973) (same); see also Aydin Monitor Systems, 83-1 BCA ¶ 16,500 at 81,997 (1983) (<HOLDING>). Thus, by analogy , GD was only obligated to
holding that the cost of capital equipment is not recoverable under the terms of the miller act holding that one method of computing damages for a breach of contract is the contract price less the reasonable cost of completion holding that government was not entitled to recover for defective pricing because contractors erroneous inclusion of 209825 in its proposed overhead did not have a significant impact on price holding that the government could not charge contractor excess cost of relet contract where government caused a delay in contract performance in which contractor was to use his own equipment original contractors costs increased and government refused to allow original contractor to perform at cost but allowed new contractor to use government equipment and paid new contractor a different rate holding that under tina the requirement for submission of cost or pricing data is met when all accurate cost or pricing data reasonably available to the contractor at the time of the agreement on price is submitted