court of benefit of counsel's advocacy); Knarr v. Erie Insurance Exchange, 555 Pa. 211, 723 A.2d 664 (1999) (if appellant fails to present an issue on appeal, Superior Court is not permitted to address it, even if trial court’s disposition was fundamentally wrong); Department of Transportation v. Boros, 533 Pa. 214, 620 A.2d 1139 (1993) (Commonwealth Court erred in reversing based on issue not raised by appellant); Phillips Home Furnishings, Inc. v. Continental Bank [467 Pa. 43], 354 A.2d 542 (Pa.1976) (Superior Court was not permitted to reverse case based on claim not raised by appellant). The York Group, Inc. v. Yorktowne Caskets, Inc., 924 A.2d 1234, 1246-47 (Pa.Super.2007). See Ragnar Benson, Inc. v. Hempfield Township Municipal Authority, 916 A.2d 1183, 1192 (Pa.Super.2007) (<HOLDING>). 4 . Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as
holding that an appellate court cannot address on appeal an issue never ruled upon by the trial court holding that an appellate court cannot sua sponte address an issue that it perceives in the record where that issue is not presented at the appeal level holding issue not properly before the appellate court where appellant fails to demonstrate where in the record an issue was raised in the district court holding that an appellate court cannot consider an issue that was not preserved for appellate review holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal