immediately sealed,-not to be reopened until the current litigation arose. Viewing the totality of the circumstances, the Court thus concludes that a jury question exists as to whether the doctrine of laches should bar the Holt plaintiffs’ claims based on the 1985-1986 stock transactions. 4. Father’s Estate a. Cold Spring Property Under Kentucky law, an express trust in realty may be expressed by conduct or implied from the conduct of the parties subsequent to the transaction, by which the trust is allegedly created and from circumstances surrounding that transaction, even though there is no direct testimony to the effect that a trust was intended to be created at the time. Wilson v. St. Clair, 286 S.W.2d 554, 557 (Ky.1955); see also Evans v. Payne, 258 S.W.2d 919, 921, 923 (Ky.1953) (<HOLDING>). Such a trust in land, if parol, must be
holding that express trust was created for benefit of investors even though other person took legal title in his name as trustee holding that a trustee properly withheld trust payments owed to a prior trustee who had misappropriated trust funds holding that the trustee of a nominee trust functions more as an agent than as a true trustee holding in addition that where constructive trust imposed trustee holds legal title only under section 541a holding that by operation of law a trust results where a person holds naked title for the benefit of another