form signed by Luckner. The trial court denied the motion for reconsideration, and entered judgment against St. Paul in the amount of its UM policy limits of $25,000. St. Paul contends that the trial court erred in entering judgment against it, because the “other insurance” language in the policy should have been applied to preclude recovery of any UM benefits. We disagree, and hold that St. Paul waived any application of the “other insurance” clause by failing to timely raise the issue in the trial court. Generally, a defense which is not pled in the answer or affirmative defenses is waived, and may not be raised for the first time in a post-trial motion. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.110 and 1.140(h); see also Republic Nat’l Bank v. Araujo, 697 So.2d 164, 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (<HOLDING>). An affirmative defense is a defense which
holding argument is waived when raised for first time in reply brief holding that an argument raised for the first time in a rule 59e motion is waived on appeal holding argument based on economic loss rule waived when raised for first time in posttrial motions holding that an argument raised for the first time in a reply brief is waived holding that issues are not waived for failing to file posttrial motions from a remand proceeding where no evidence was presented because no posttrial motions were required under those circumstances