178 (Wyo.1996) (employee’s work-related and non-work-related activities caused aggravation of compensable injury and precluded further benefits). [¶ 10] In Detling v. Tessier, 60 S.D. 405, 244 N.W. 538 (1932), aff'd. on reh’g, 61 S.D. 403, 249 N.W. 686, this Court addressed the situation involving a workers’ compensation claimant with a compensable back injury who failed to follow medical advice concerning the injury and who later attempted to obtain additional compensation for aggravation to that injury. We reversed the judgment of the circuit court granting additional compensation. The evidence showed the claimant had willfully disregarded his physician’s advice by continuing to perform he (Del.Super. 1974); Johnnie’s Produce Co. v. Benedict & Jordan, 120 So.2d 12, 13, (Fla. 1960) (<HOLDING>); Giacoletto v. Silver Bow Pizza Parlor, 231
holding that the intervening act breaks the chain of causation set in operation by a defendants negligence thereby insulating his negligence as a direct cause of the injury holding that if a claimant knowing of certain weaknesses rashly undertakes activities likely to produce harmful results the chain of causation is broken by the claimants own negligence recognizing that a bailee who undertakes the care of goods without reward is liable for damage caused only by his or her gross negligence holding that in negligence actions florida courts follow the more likely than not standard of causation ie they require proof that the negligence probably caused the plaintiffs injury holding that the burden of proof is on the claimant