SE2d 227) (2008). 2 Roberson v. Leone, 315 Ga. App. 459, 462 (726 SE2d 565) (2012) (punctuation omitted); accord Turner v. Gateway Ins. Co., 290 Ga. App. 737, 739 (660 SE2d 484) (2008). 3 Roberson, 315 Ga. App. at 462 (punctuation omitted); accord Infinity Gen. Ins. Co. v. Litton, 308 Ga. App. 497, 500 (2) (707 SE2d 885) (2011). 4 Roberson, 315 Ga. App. at 462 (punctuation omitted); accord Litton, 308 Ga. App. at 500 (2). 5 Roberson, 315 Ga. App. at 462 (punctuation omitted); accord Clayton v. S. Gen. Ins. Co., 306 Ga. App. 394, 396 (702 SE2d 446) (2010). 6 Couch on Insurance, § 185:87 (3d ed. 2012). 7 First Am. Bank v. First Am. Transp. Title Ins. Co., 759 F3d 427, 432 (III) (5th Cir. 2014); see also Falmouth Nat. Bank v. Ticor Title Ins. Co., 920 F2d 1058, 1063 (II) (1st Cir. 1990) (<HOLDING>); Associated Bank, N.A. v. Stewart Title Guar.
holding that an insured mortgagees loss under a title insurance policy cannot be measured until the note has not been repaid and the security for the mortgage is shown to be inadequate holding that because a mortgage provides the security for the repayment of the note the person having standing to foreclose a note secured by a mortgage may be either the holder of the note or a nonholder in possession of the note who has the rights of a holder holding that a mortgageeinsureds loss cannot be determined unless the note is not repaid and the security for the mortgage proves inadequate holding that a mortgagees loss cannot he measured unless the underlying debt is not repaid and the security for the mortgage proves inadequate holding that the note and the mortgage must coexist to give the mortgage validity