by the confidentiality and obvious temporal features of such proceedings. ¶ 7 Secondly, our panel discussed the possibility of remanding the matter to the trial court for an explication of her findings and reasons, but we were told by the child’s attorney at the hearing on 2/13/03, that the final day for an order permitting the achievement of an abortion in this case was 2/14/03. Under the circumstances, obviously a remand to the trial court was not feasible. ¶ 8 Thirdly, there is nothing in the statute or the rule of court, Pa.R.A.P. 3801-3807, which provides for a standard of review. No one has suggested that the function of the appeals court in this setting is to provide a de novo hearing and determination. Cf. In re Petition of Anonymous 2, 253 Neb. 485, 570 N.W.2d 836 (1997) (<HOLDING>). Since the matter is reviewed under
holding that the appellate standard of review of ineffectiveness claim is de novo holding that we review a district courts interpretation of a statute de novo holding that under nebraska statute appellate review is de novo recognizing de novo standard of review holding that review of the construction of a sentencing statute is de novo