here, the statutory standing objection in Derzapf was raised in the trial court. 5 . See Tex. Ass’n of Bus. v. Tex. Air Control Bd., 852 S.W.2d 440, 445-46 (Tex.1993) (address ing challenge raised for first time on appeal to business association’s standing to seek declaration that statutes authorizing agencies to assess fines were unconstitutional); Schwartzott v. Etheridge Prop. Mgmt., 403 S.W.3d 488, 498-99 & n. 4 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.) (addressing challenge raised for first time on appeal to condominium owners’ standing to sue owners’ association, and concluding that dispute went to merits of claims rather than standing); Trojacek v. Estate of Kveton, No. 14-07-00911-CV, 2009 WL 909591, at *3 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] April 7, 2009, no pet.) (mem. op.) (<HOLDING>); Saudi v. Brieven, 176 S.W.3d 108, 113, 117
holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that even though the declarant was not in danger she was experiencing an ongoing emergency because she did not know where her children were and she feared for their safety holding that the court can raise res judicata sua sponte even on appeal holding sua sponte that appellant even though she was a party in the trial court did not have standing to appeal probate courts judgment rescinding deeds concerning real property in which she had no interest holding that the district court had no right to apply the statute of limitations sua sponte because it had been waived