discretion of the trial judge, whose decision will not be overturned absent an abuse of discretion. Fields v. J. Haynes Waters Builders, Inc., 376 S.C. 545, 567, 658 S.E.2d 80, 92 (2008). Generally, all relevant evidence is admissible. Rule 402, SCRE. Evidence is relevant if it has any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. Rule 401, SCRE. Here, McCall’s sole objection raised to admission of the e-mail at the damages hearing was that it was not relevant because it was an “offer” from another party and not from IKON. Thus, this is the only argument on this issue preserved for review. See Durham v. Vinson, 360 S.C. 639, 653-54, 602 S.E.2d 760, 767 (2004) (<HOLDING>). McCall admitted at the hearing that he was
recognizing that a defendant may not raise one ground for objection at trial and argue a different ground on appeal holding an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review holding an issue not preserved when one ground is raised to the trial court and another ground is raised on appeal holding to preserve an issue for appellate review the issue must have been raised to and ruled upon by trial court and a party may not argue one ground for objection at trial and another ground on appeal holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal