are agreements “attendant upon the dissolution of [the] marriage,” are postnuptial agreements, not premarital agreements. Since 1977, section 503 of the Dissolution Act has allowed premarital agreements that deal with questions of marital property. 750 ILCS 5/503(d)(7) (West 1998) (court shall consider “any antenuptial agreement of the parties”); In re Marriage of Jelinek, 244 Ill. App. 3d 496, 501-02, 613 N.E.2d 1284, 1289 (1993). There was a question, however, whether the Dissolution Act changed the previous rule that a premarital agreement could not deal with questions of maintenance. 750 ILCS 5/504(a)(ll) (West 1998) (factors to consider when awarding maintenance include “any valid agreement of the parties”); see Eule v. Eule, 24 Ill. App. 3d 83, 87, 320 N.E.2d 506, 510 (1974) (<HOLDING>); Warren v. Warren, 169 Ill. App. 3d 226, 231,
holding that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering temporary alimony that exceeded the husbands ability to pay holding such a provision waiving alimony valid holding that first husband had no knowledge of his exwifes second marriage until four days before the second marriage was annulled so he was not inconvenienced and alimony was reinstated holding that an agreement which both addressed alimony and divided the parties property in the event of divorce was not a marriage contract subject to ocga  19363 holding invalid a premarital agreement waiving temporary alimony if marriage did not last seven years