United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) & (2) (emphasis added); see also 10th Cir. Criminal Pattern Jury Instructions § 2.05 (2011). Additionally, nothing indicates Agent Knoll’s testimony that Mr. Valenzuela-Carrillo ultimately "was removed to Mexico,” ROA, Vol. IV at 358, was not based on his own personal observations. Regardless, because Mr. Valenzuela-Carrillo’s successful prosecution for illegal reentry was enough to establish his unlawful presence in the country, it was not necessary for Agent Knoll to attest to Mr. Valenzuela-Carrillo’s physical removal from the United States or any formal proceedings following the successful illegal reentry prosecution. 15 . See also United States v. Acosta-Acevedo, 979 F.2d 858, 1992 WL 332242, at *2 (10th Cir.1992) (unpublished table decision) (<HOLDING>). Although unpublished, Acosta-Acevedo’s rea-
holding that testimony of ins official who had personal exposure to countys recordkeeping practices was sufficient to support a finding of personal knowledge especially given the defenses failure to further explore the nexus between the witnesss experience and purported personal knowledge on crossexamination citing davis 792 f2d at 130405 holding that a jurors personal knowledge or experience constitutes extrinsic evidence where the juror interjects his or her past personal experiences into deliberations in the absence of any record evidence on a given fact holding that the affidavit in question did not satisfy the burden of the party moving for summary judgment where affiants eonclusory statement failed to indicate personal knowledge of the circumstances in question and personal knowledge could not be reasonably inferred from the contents of the affidavit holding that the failure of an affidavit to be made on personal knowledge or specify how the affiant had personal knowledge of the facts asserted is a defect in substance and need not be objected to at trial to be a ground for reversal holding that lay testimony is competent if it is limited to matters that the witness has actually observed and is within the realm of the witnesss personal knowledge