of New York and Dolloff of New Mexico.” This issue may have ramifications beyond this suit. Pursuant to NMRA 1-019A, joinder of Dolloff of New Mexico is needed for a just adjudication of the coverage dispute. II. THE COURT WILL NOT REALIGN DOLLOFF OF NEW MEXICO AS A PARTY PLAINTIFF. There is no dispute that Nance already has a judgment against Dolloff of New Mexico. The question is whether Nance may seek to collect that judgment under a policy of insurance that Underwriters issued to Dolloff of New York. Underwriters contends that, because Nance already has a judgment against Dolloff of New Mexico, his interests are no longer adverse to Dolloff of New Mexico. Underwriters argues that his interests are now aligned with Dolloff of New Mexico. See Davis v. Carey, 149 F.Supp.2d at 596 (<HOLDING>). Underwriters urges that Davis v. Carey is
recognizing that the party against whom a default judgment is entered admits all wellpleaded factual allegations as true holding that district courts order granting motion for default judgment was erroneous  because a default judgment cannot be entered until the amount of damages has been ascertained  holding that the insurers declaratory relief action presented a justiciable controversy for the injured parties even though the insured tortfeasor had suffered a default judgment holding that the district court erred in dismissing the injured party from the insureds declaratory relief action based on a default judgment entered against the insured and the insureds tortfeasor son holding that no actual substantial controversy exists between plaintiff and tortfeasor against whom default judgment has been entered in a subsequent coverage action