discussed by the supreme court in both Heggs and Maddox. As a result of appellant’s failure to utilize the procedural mechanisms available to him for preserving his single subject challenge for appellate review, this court, in keeping with the limitations on the impact of the decision in Maddox, will not consider the merits of the single subject challenge raised by appellant for the first time in his amended initial brief. See Capre v. State, 773 So.2d 92 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (declining to reach merits of alleged sentencing error where defendant’s trial had taken place after most recent amendments to rule 3.800(b) and defendant had failed to raise the issue in the trial court or in postsenteneing proceedings pursuant to rule 3.800(b)); Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(<HOLDING>). DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur. 1 . See
holding that a sentencing error which had been held to be fundamental for defendants falling within the window period identified in maddox could not be raised for the first time on appeal by a defendant who had filed his initial appellate brief outside the window period identified in maddox without having previously raised his sentencing issue in the trial court either by objection or by postsentencing 3800b motion filed before or after the filing of his notice of appeal holding issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial judge to be preserved for appellate review holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that for defendants whose initial briefs were filed after the effective date of rule 3800b2 the failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3800b or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses them from raising the error on direct appeal holding that failure to preserve a fundamental sentencing error by motion under rule 3800b or by objection during the sentencing hearing forecloses a defendant from raising the error on direct appeal