speak with his Unit Manager. See Exh. B to Plaintiffs Response. On August 1, 2007, Plaintiff submitted another Sick Call Request Form, again complaining of chest pains, headaches, nausea, dizziness, breathing problems, coughing and vomiting and requesting that he see a doctor and be moved to a nonsmoking zone. The form indicates that Plaintiff did not show up for his appointment on August 14, 2007. See ecf. doc. no. 179-5. On October 23, 2007, Plaintiff submitted another Sick Call Request Form. See Exh. CB to Plaintiffs Response. It is unclear from laim against Defendants Banks and Jackson appears to be that they denied plaintiff relief through the ARP. This is not a sufficient basis for imposing liability under Section 1983. See Johnson v. Johnson, 385 F.3d 503, 526 (5th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>); Poullard v. Blanco, 2006 WL 1675218, at *5
holding that during an investigatory detention officers are authorized to take such steps as are reasonably necessary to protect their personal safety and to maintain the status quo recognizing drug traffickers will commonly possess firearms to protect their product to protect their drugs to protect their cash to protect their life and even to protect their turf alteration in original internal quotation marks omit ted holding that inmates have a property interest in their money holding that shu confinement that manifests an administrative strategy designed to preserve order in the prison and protect the safety of all inmates need only be supported by some evidence and noting that the assignment of inmates within the california prisons is essentially a matter of administrative discretion citations and internal quotation marks omitted holding that prison supervisory officials reasonably discharge  their duty to protect the inmates in their care where they responded to plaintiffs complaints by referring the matter for further investigation or taking similar administrative steps