Land O' Lakes will agree to extend the scheduling order "only ... on the condition that the Insurers stipulate that no additional request for a continuance will be made in the future 'based upon, arising out of, connected to, or in any way involving’ the additional groundwater monitoring or anything else contained in the ESD.”). 13 . See also Morrone v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 283 N.J.Super. 411, 662 A.2d 562, 565 (N.J.Super.Ct.App.Div.1995) ("[The insured] cannot claim that the damage was triggered during the terms of the policies and yet avoid the corresponding [owned-property] exclusion simply because a claim for damages arising therefrom was not made until after she was able to sell the property.”); cf. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 563 N.W.2d 724, 734 (Minn. 1997) (<HOLDING>). 14 . A representative insuring clause
holding that an ownedproperty exclusion did not apply with respect to property that the insured bought only after the policy periods for which the insured sought coverage holding a personal profit exclusion applicable to an insured corporation where the purpose of the exclusion was to exclude coverage when the insured received profits to which the insured was not legally entitled holding that an insurance company which chose not to defend its insured could not later deny coverage by asserting the legally obligated to pay provision in the policy after the insured reached a settlement where the injured party agreed to collect only against insurance proceeds holding that the use of the phrase any insured rather than the insured the same language used in the employers liability exclusion here meant that the exclusion was not limited to injuries sustained by the employees or contractors of one insured party holding that the policy insured property but failure to occupy premises negated coverage