Ark. 151, 628 S.W.2d 17, 19 (1982) (adopting the rule and affirming the trial court’s refusal to allow plaintiff’s claims of both respondeat superior and negligent en-trustment to go to the jury)); Idaho (Wise v. Fiberglass Sys., Inc., 110 Idaho 740, 718 P.2d 1178, 1181-82 (1986) (affirming the trial court’s dismissal of direct negligence claims after defendant-employer admitted responsibility for employee’s negligence and agreeing with the rationale for the rule as articulated by the Georgia Court of Appeals in Willis, 159 S.E.2d at 158)); and Wyoming (Beavis v. Campbell Cty. Mem'l Hosp., 20 P.3d 508, 516 (Wyo. 2001) (affirming dismissal of claims for negligent hiring and negligent training/supervision)). 8 . E.g., Clooney v. Geeting, 352 So.2d 1216, 1220 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977) (<HOLDING>); Bartja v. Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co., 218
holding that a constructive discharge would constitute a tangible employment action and prevent the employer from utilizing the affirmative defense to vicarious employer liability for sexual harassment holding that under louisiana law dishonest act exclusion in employers commercial liability policy excluded negligence and vicarious liability claims against employer for losses based upon the excluded conduct of its employee holding that trial court did not err holding that trial court did not err in striking plaintiffs negligent hiring employment and entrustment claims against employer where employer acknowledged vicarious liability for employees negligence holding that trial court did not err in separating negligent entrustment and negligence claims for trial