of “creating, abolishing, or recreating” municipal agencies, as the charter suggests. It simply discharged one group of employees with which it had a contractual obligation in favor of another group that was willing to do the very same work for less money. This contract may have been too rich for the city’s blood, but it is beyond dispute that the city agreed to it, the city requested that it be amended, the city’s chief executive officer signed it, and the city’s legislative body ratified it. Municipalities cannot simply shed contractual obligations because a better deal can be found elsewhere, terminating a legally binding agreement in the process. See Exeter-West Greenwich Regional School District v. Exeter-West Greenwich Teachers’ Association, 489 A.2d 1010, 1020 (R.I.1985) (<HOLDING>). Finally, the arbitrator’s award is entitled
holding that when a court accepts a fixed plea agreement it is bound by the agreements terms holding that agency is bound by its regulations holding that the unauthorized transfer of estate assets was in blatant disregard of the integrity of the court as well as the constraints mandated by congress in the bankruptcy code holding that the government is no longer bound by its obligations under a plea agreement when a defendant commits a material breach holding that a city or town is bound by and must fund the valid collectivebargaining agreements entered into by its school committee as well as other obligations incurred in the providing of services mandated by law