agreement. The court accepted the plea agreement, placed Alex on standard probation, ordered him to serve five days of detention and perform 32 hours of community service, and ordered him to pay restitution of $107.07 to the victim. ¶ 3 Some months later, Alex’s probation officer filed a petition with the juvenile court, alleging that Alex had violated several terms of his probation. When Alex admitted having violated one of the terms, the remaining violation allegations were dismissed and Alex was detained pending a disposition hearing. ¶ 4 By the time of the disposition hearing, the State had discovered that the statute underlying Alex’s one-count adjudication of delinquency had been declared unconstitutional by this court. See In re Cesar R., 197 Ariz. 437, 4 P.3d 980 (App.1999) (<HOLDING>). Alex, informed of this development, moved to
holding that utah const art vi  1 limits legislatures ability to delegate legislative powers or functions to others holding statute authorizing creation of community councils in certain counties was unconstitutional special law holding that a patentee was entitled to jmol where the thrust of the defendants noninfringement argument was that it did not infringe the patents at issue because it was practicing the prior art holding that the minorinpossessionofafirearm statute because it was limited to juveniles in maricopa and pima counties was a special or local law that violated ariz const art 4 pt 2  197 holding that a claim was not indefinite for using the term selector because it was a standard component and its structure was well known in the art