and judgment is withdrawn, and a revised order and judgment is attached to this order. The suggestion for rehearing en banc was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service as required by Fed. R.App. P. 35. As no member of the panel and no judge in regular active service on the court requested that the court be polled, the suggestion is denied. ORDER AND JUDGMENT Lindsey K. Springer, proceeding pro se, brought a Bivens action against eleven special agents of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), asserting that they violated his Fourth Amendment rights by stealing $2,000 during or following the execution of a search warrant at his home. See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (<HOLDING>). The district court denied the agent’s motion
holding that a federal cause of action for damages arises upon a federal agents unconstitutional conduct recognizing an action for damages against unknown federal agents for the violation of constitutional rights recognizing a cause of action for damages against officials who violate constitutional or statutory rights under color of federal law recognizing cause of action for damages against federal agents acting under their authority who allegedly violated plaintiffs fourth amendment rights recognizing an implied fourth amendment action for damages