Eduardo Cruz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming, without opinion, an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Cruz’s contentions that the BIA’s streamlining regulations violate his right to due process are foreclosed by Falcon Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 849-51 (9th Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>). The Clerk is directed to stay the mandate
holding that imposition of more severe sentence following trial de novo does violate defendants due process rights holding that doctrine does not violate due process holding that the bias streamlining procedure does not violate an aliens due process rights holding that the defendant bears the burden of proof and that such a disposition does not violate the due process clause holding that negligent inaction by a jail officer does not violate due process