“fair hearing” and was a violation of the fundamental due process right to be heard. “[D]ue process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.” Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 481, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Of course, on remand, the court may place reasonable restrictions on the length and manner of counsel’s argument, and in its discretion, may even require counsel to submit its argument in writing. Because of our disposition on this issue, we have not reached the other arguments raised by Bleiweiss. On remand, we direct that the proceedings be heard by a different judge. Petition Granted. HAZOURI, J., concurs. WARNER, J., dissents in part and concurs in part with opinion. 1 . State v. Arthur, 390 So.2d 717, 719 (Fla.1980) (<HOLDING>). See also Art. I, § 14, Fla. Const. The degree
holding that before pretrial detention may be ordered in a life felony case state must show that proof is evident or the presumption great holding   2241 is the proper avenue by which to challenge pretrial detention holding that motion challenging pretrial detention was excludable under act holding that proof of an agreement to commit a felony is not a necessary element in a conviction for the commission of the felony holding that juvenile pretrial detention implicates due process rights