2 . The third and fourth claims for relief concern the School Board election districts. The court granted summary judgment to Navajo Nation on its fourth claim for relief. (Dkt. 280.) 3 . Dkt. 75, p. 7. 4 . Dkts. 207, 248. 5 . Dkt. 207. 6 . Dkt. 248. 7 . Yanito v. Barber, 348 F.Supp. 587, 589 (D.Utah 1972). 8 . Dkt. 166, p. 6; see Dkt. 80, p. 8. 9 . Samuel Isaacharoff et al„ The Law of Democracy: Legal Structure of the Political Process, 758 (4th ed. 2012) (noting that ''[a]s late as 1982, a sizeable majority of municipal elections were conducted at large” and that many states "elected at least some legislators from multimember districts”). 10 . See Dkt. 272-1. 11 . Id. ¶ 31. 12 . Id. 13 . Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630, 652, 113 S.Ct. 2816, 125 L.Ed.2d 511 (1993) [hereinafter Shaw 7] (<HOLDING>). 14 . In 1982, Congress made § 2 claims easier
holding out admission to practice law when not admitted to practice recognizing that the essence of a  2 claim is that a certain electoral law practice or structure interacts with social and historical conditions to cause an inequality in the opportunities enjoyed by minority and white voters to elect their preferred representatives recognizing that the court has the power to grant leave upon certain conditions holding that historical practice is important when courts interpret the constitution even when the nature or longevity of that practice is subject to dispute and even when that practice began after the founding era holding the insurer liable for failing to settle the claim when time was of the essence