to "REDDEL" because the Federal Bureau of Investigation was otherwise "clear that they were searching" for the former); see also State v. Rosario, 238 Conn. 380, 680 A.2d 237, 240-41 (1996) (concluding that an affidavit's misstatement of the year did not undermine probable cause where other information in the affidavit indicated the correct year); State v. White, 368 So.2d 1000, 1002 (La.1979) (same); State v. Marquardt, 48 Or.App. 515, 603 P.2d 1198, 1199 (1979) (same); 2 Wayne R. LaFave, Search and Seisure § 8.7), at 496 (5th ed. 2012) ("[Rleference to a year other than the current year will not invalidate the warrant if the circumstances fairly indicate that the intended reference was to the current year."). But see Stroud v. Commonwealth, 295 Ky. 694, 175 S.W.2d 368, 369 (1948) (<HOLDING>); Greenstreet v. State, 392 Md. 652, 898 A.2d
holding that if sufficient untainted evidence was presented in the warrant affidavit to establish probable cause the warrant was nevertheless valid holding that a search warrant is invalid if not based on an affidavit holding that an affidavit did not provide probable cause sufficient to validate a warrant where the affidavit stated an incorrect date uncontradicted by any other specific fact in the affidavit holding that affidavit supported probable cause determination when the affidavit stated only that an occupant of defendants home subscribed to child pornography egroup holding that an incorporated affidavit did not provide particularity because the government offered no evidence that the affidavit or any copies were ever attached to the warrant or were present at the time of the search