at the officers for what they believed to be an unusually long time”); see also United States v. Pratt, 355 F.3d 1119, 1120 (8th Cir.2004) (noting that because suspect "looked at officers ... twice” and jogged to an empty lot, dle officers concluded he was trying to avoid them and a Terry stop ensued); Price v. Kramer, 200 F.3d 1237, 1247 n.12 (9th Cir.2000); United States v. Griffin, 150 F.3d 778, 784 (7th Cir.1998); United States v. Madison, 936 F.2d 90, 91 (2d Cir.1991). 2 . Before this case, I was not familiar with the notion that compliance with the letter of textbook driver's education instructions would trigger police suspicion, i.e., both hands on the wheel, no rubbernecking. See, e.g., Va. Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, Va. Driver Manual § 2 (Dangerous Driving Behaviors) (2004) (<HOLDING>) (emphasis added), at
holding that a car that moved from side to side left the paved portion of the road and weaved over the center of the road created reasonable suspicion of driving while intoxicated holding no reasonable suspicion where only indicia of criminal activity was truck driving on public road late at night holding that a road not open to the public at all times was not a highway recognizing the danger of distracted driving and stating keep your eyes on the road and your hands on the wheel at all times holding the right of free speech is not absolute at all times and under all circumstances