losses to contracting parties as well as losses to third-parties. Id. The Supreme Court of Ohio has defined indemnity as arising “from contract, express or implied, and is a right of a person who has been compelled to pay what another should pay in full to require complete reimbursement.” Travelers Indem. Co. v. Trowbridge, 41 Ohio St.2d 11, 13-14, 321 N.E.2d 787 (Ohio 1975), overruled on other grounds by Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. v. Huron Rd. Hosp., 73 Ohio St.3d 391, 653 N.E.2d 235 (Ohio 1995). Defendants cite to no case that expressly limits the principle of indemnification to third-party damages. Further, there is no other contractual provision in the License Agreement referring to third-party claims that could be used to narrow the scope of section 24(a). See Mead, 319 F.3d at 798 (<HOLDING>). Absent an express limitation on the
holding that thirdparty indemnity claims are not premature holding that a contracts indemnification clause which did not contain an express limitation to thirdparty claims should be read in conjunction with a separate contract clause that stated that a partys liability for thirdparty claims should be limited to indemnification holding that a contract should be read to give reasonable meaning to all provisions of that contract holding that limitations from the specification should not be read into the claims holding that the governments cooperation with a thirdparty is not sufficient to establish a thirdparty beneficiary relationship