that lottery winnings are marital property and should be divided equally in a divorce action when both spouses made equal contributions to the marriage even though the winning ticket was acquired solely by husbands' effort); Ullah v. Ullah, 55 N.Y.S. 2d 834, 835 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990), (held that a lottery jackpot won during marriage is marital property and that equal division is appropriate since the jackpot was won as a result of fortuitous circumstances and not the result of either spouse's toil or labor); Giedinghagen v. Giedinghagen, 712 S. W. 2d 711 (Mo. Ct. App. 1986) (held that marital property encompasses any property including lottery winnings, acquired up to the date of a decree of legal separation or dissolution); See also Dyer v. Dyer, 536 A.2d 453 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1988) (<HOLDING>) In the case at bar, the defendant bought the
holding that the trial court had not abused its discretion in determining that a husbands lottery winnings obtained after a fourteen year separation but before divorce were his sole property because the winnings were not acquired during marriage and had no impact on the standard of living of the marital union holding that assets acquired subsequent to separation are not considered marital property absent evidence that spouse used marital property to obtain them holding that trial court had jurisdiction to consider custody dispute before a divorce or separation action had commenced holding that money invested in voluntary investment plan during marriage was marital property because it was property acquired during marriage holding that the trial court had authority to enforce a marital property settlement agreement that had not been incorporated into the parties final divorce decree