49, United States Code.” Id. § 5(d)(2), 120 Stat. at 2013. The only contract described in section 5(d)(1)(A) is, as noted above, the Contract executed by Dallas, Fort Worth, the DFW Board, American, and Southwest on July 11, 2006. Accordingly, the court determines that the explicit references to the Contract in the language of the statute demonstrate Congress’s intent to incorporate the Contract into the WARA. c. Section 5 of the WARA Codifies Under Federal Law Specific Obligations Set Forth in the Contract Congress, by incorporating the Contract into the WARA, rendered the obligations set forth in the Contract matters of federal law. See Love Terminal Partners, L.P., 256 S.W.3d at 897 (referencing section 5 of the statute); see also Love Terminal Partners, L.P., 527 F.Supp.2d at 558 (<HOLDING>). Indeed, during the state court litigation,
holding that an application is  pending from the time it is first filed  emphasis added holding that the law in effect at the time a contract is made is as much a part of the contract as if incorporated therein holding breachofcontract claim preempted because the plaintiff tried to enlarge the federal rights that were incorporated into the contract holding that the statute incorporated all the rights and obligations of the contract emphasis added holding that federal statutes and regulations can form the basis of a breach of contract claim if expressly incorporated into the contract