that "even if the jur[ors] understood the instruction as directing them to 'nullify' their answers to the special issues, they still would have faced the ethical dilemma of violating their oath to render a ‘true verdict’ by providing false answers to the special issues in order to give effect to Bigby’s mitigating evidence and comply with the supplemental instruction"). 5 . Garcia also argues that his pedophilia may be considered mitigating of his moral culpability. We reject this argument. In contrast to the abuse Garcia himself suffered as a child, pedophilia is not a mitigating personal characteristic and does not meet even the low threshold of relevance set by Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274, 284-85, 124 S.Ct. 2562, 159 L.Ed.2d 384 (2004). 6 . See Abdul-Kabir, 127 S.Ct. at 1667-73
recognizing the same rule in texas courts recognizing this texas rule recognizing limitations as stated in franklin v lynaugh 487 us 164 108 sct 2320 101 led2d 155 1988 graham v collins 506 us 461 113 sct 892 122 led2d 260 1993 johnson v texas 509 us 350 113 sct 2658 125 led2d 290 1993 holding that general jurisdiction did not exist where the defendant occasionally sold products to entities in texas that used the defendants products for projects in texas and the defendants employees made field visits to texas between december 1992 and december 1993 holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied