An elementary school is housed nearby, and a creek flows through the apartment complex and empties into the Tennessee River. Id. at 471. Regarding the substantiality of the risk created by Whited’s methamphetamine-production operation, the risk here is far greater than in Davidson and arguably even greater than in Layne. Whited, his methamphetamine laboratory, and a 17-year-old girl were all in the same room when and where the arrest took place at the Country Inns and Suites motel. According to travel web sites, the motel is an 81-unit complex. To be sure, nothing in the record indicates the manner of disposal (the second Guidelines’ factor) of the hazardous materials in Whited’s motel room, so we must therefore treat that factor as “indeterminate.” See Davidson, 409 F.3d at 314 (<HOLDING>). The other relevant factors, however, militate
holding that an arranger must have owned or possessed or had the authority to control or duty to dispose of  the hazardous materials at issue holding that in the absence of a government crossappeal an appellate court may not sua sponte correct a district court error if the correction would be to the defendants detriment holding the order is only reviewable if actually considered by the district court holding that in the absence of any evidence suggesting that hazardous materials were actually disposed of in an improper manner it is not appropriate for the district court to speculate that they would be holding that it is not