stated above, we affirm orders of detention entered by the children’s court for Steven B., Gabriel C., Gerald L., and Matthew S. • {50} IT IS SO ORDERED. WECHSLER, Chief Judge, concurs. KENNEDY, Judge (specially concurring). KENNEDY, Judge (specially concurring). {51} This ease speaks more to the consequences of failing to preserve issues at the trial level, than to the propriety of forming specialty courts. We should be mindful that children’s court itself is a creature of statute, being created under the umbrella of Article VI, Sections 1 and 13, of the New Mexico Constitution, conferring jurisdiction on the district courts over “special cases and proceedings as may be conferred by law.” NMSA 1978, § 32A-1-5 (1993); see, e.g., In re Santillanes, 47 N.M. 140, 138 P.2d 503 (1943) (<HOLDING>). The power to prescribe rules and procedures
holding that in order for there to be state debt in the constitutional sense one legislature in effect must obligate a future legislature to appropriate funds to discharge the debt created by the first legislature holding that when the legislature enacts a statute it is presumed that the legislature is aware of existing statutes holding that juvenile court is created by the legislature pursuant to art vi  13 holding entities created by statute can only exercise the powers granted to them by the legislature holding that although the juvenile restitution statute does not expressly require the juvenile court to determine whether the juvenile has the ability to pay the restitution ordered as a condition of probation the policies underlying the adult restitutions command that a trial court make such an inquiry applies with equal force to juvenile courts