him the Passenger Sales Representative or Account Manager positions because he suffered no adverse employment action. “An adverse employment action is one which is more disruptive than a mere inconvenience or an alteration of job responsibilities.” Id. at 138 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). An adverse employment action works a materially adverse change in the terms and conditions of employment. Galabya v. New York City Bd. of Educ., 202 F.3d 636, 640 (2d Cir.2000). “Because there are no bright-line rules, courts must pore over each case to determine whether the challenged employment action reaches the level of ‘adverse.’ ” Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co., 108 F.3d 462, 466 (2d Cir.1997). “Ex-ampies of materially adverse changes include termi 21, 132 (S.D.N.Y.2001) (<HOLDING>). There are some circumstances under which a
holding that a denial of transfer was not an adverse employment action where the plaintiff asserted only that the transfer would allow him to work closer to home holding that a transfer to a worksite 180 miles away from plaintiffs home did not necessarily constitute an adverse employment action while noting that such a transfer could under some circumstances constitute an adverse employment action holding that denial of a lateral transfer which would have allowed plaintiff to be near his wife was not an adverse employment action holding that denial of a bonus was not an adverse employment action holding that a transfer of job duties can constitute an adverse employment action