outweighed by their safety and security needs. Moreover, the court concluded that because Maternal Aunt is Mother’s sister, “a completef ] loss of contact seems unlikely.” Id. at 8. The court’s discussion, quoted above, reveals that the court concluded that Mother failed to provide the Children with a safe environment, and that the termination of Mother’s parental rights is in the Children’s best interests. Id. at 6. The court found that although the Children have a bond with Mother, the bond is not necessarily meaningful or healthy. Id. at 7. See In re T.S.M., 620 Pa. 602, 71 A.3d 251, 268 (2018) (stating that the strong parent-child bond was an unhealthy one that could not by itself serve as grounds to prolong foster care drift); see also In re L.M., 923 A.2d 505, 512 (Pa.Super.2007) (<HOLDING>). The court also noted that the Children are no
holding that a parents love of her child alone does not preclude a termination holding that parents may not voluntarily terminate their rights in a child to avoid child support payments or contract away a child support obligation holding that child cannot consent to search of parents bedroom holding that although a parents general duty to support his or her child ends when the child reaches twentyone years of age parents are free to enter into binding agreements to do so holding that custodial parents death does not terminate noncustodial parents child support obligations set forth in dissolution decree