Subpoenas), 144 F.3d 653, 658-59 (10th Cir.1998). To do so the Debtor must meet the following test: (1) the Debtor must show that he approached Kennedy & Graven for the purpose of seeking legal advice; (2) he must demonstrate that when he approached Kennedy & Graven, he made it clear he was seeking legal advice in his individual rather than representative capacity; (3) he must demonstrate that Kennedy & Graven saw fit to communicate with him in his individual capacity, knowing that a possible conflict could arise; (4) he must prove that his conversations with Kennedy & Graven were confidential; and (5) he must show that the substance of his conversations with Kennedy & Graven did not concern matters involving administration of the estate. Id. 6 Inc., 27 B.R. 28, 28 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1982) (<HOLDING>). However, the And-ros decision does not on its
holding that the information is not protected by attorneyclient privilege holding that an invocation of the advice of counsel defense waives the attorneyclient privilege holding that failure to timely assert attorneyclient privilege constitutes waiver holding that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel waives attorneyclient privilege holding that an individuals attorneyclient privilege never transfers to the trastee