he wrote to defendant Marinelli asking if he was being medicated, but defendant Marinelli did not respond. Compl. at 29, 36. This is insufficient to implicate defendant Marinelli in the alleged forced medication of plaintiff. 14 . Whether all five Colon factors for supervisor liability remain available in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 129 S.Ct. 1937, has been debated by the district courts in this circuit. See, e.g., Pearce v. Estate of Longo, 766 F.Supp.2d 367, 376 (N.D.N.Y.2011), rev’d in part on other grounds sub nom., Pearce v. Labella, 473 Fed.Appx. 16 (2d Cir.2012) (recognizing that several district courts in the Second Circuit have debated Iqbal's impact on the five Colon factors); Kleehammer v. Monroe Cnty., 743 F.Supp.2d 175, 185 (W.D.N.Y.2010) (<HOLDING>); D’Olimpio v. Crisafi, 718 F.Supp.2d 340, 347
holding there is no duty to third parties on the part of a premises owner who could not have foreseen the criminal acts of third parties holding that where a third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract the forum selection clause applies to the third party recognizing that a forum selection clause also applies to a nonsignatory third party where the third partys conduct is closely related to the contractual relationship or the contractual dispute and where the third party enjoys financial benefit from the contract holding under minnesota law that third party was not intended beneficiary merely because contract for sale of fixtures required title to pass from seller through third party to buyer holding that only the first and part of the third colon categories pass iqbals muster