person has engaged, or is or soon will be engaging, in criminal activity. Garcia v. State, 43 S.W.3d 527, 530 (Tex.Crim.App.2001). Thus, the totality of the circumstances must be perused. Next, when the circumstances implicate an anonymous tip, caution must be taken. This is so because the tip, standing alone, seldom provides the reasonable suspicion necessary to authorize an investigative stop and detention. Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325, 329, 110 S.Ct. 2412, 110 L.Ed.2d 301 (1990). In other words, “a police officer generally cannot rely alone on a police broadcast of an anonymous phone call to establish reasonable suspicion.” Garcia v. State, 3 S.W.3d 227, 234-35 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th] 1999, no pet.); see Stewart v. State, 22 S.W.3d 646, 648-50 (Tex.App.-Austin 2000, pet. ref'd) (<HOLDING>); Davis v. State, 989 S.W.2d 859, 862-65
holding an informants tip can establish reasonable suspicion without investigative confirmation if the tip is credible holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop holding that a tip to look out for a black person without more does not give rise to reasonable suspicion to stop anyone holding a tip by informant who claimed to witness wrongdoing sufficient to establish reasonable suspicion holding that an uncorroborated callers tip did not create reasonable suspicion