drug offenses of possession with intent to sell. § 775.084(1)(a)(3), Fla. Stat. (2003); Burgess v. State, 854 So.2d 754 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCray v. State, 769 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We therefore strike the habitual felony offender designation on the sentence for count four (possession of cannabis with intent to sell). Second, we agree with Jones’s argument that the judgment contains a scrivener’s error showing that he was convicted sly imposed certain costs and fines at sentencing. The $150 assessed for prosecution costs and the $130 assessed for investigative costs under section 938.27, Florida Statutes (2003), must be stricken because there was no request for the costs or documentation in the record to support them. See James v. State, 898 So.2d 1161 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (<HOLDING>). The $50 fine imposed under section 775.083,
holding that a sentence imposed within statutory limits will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion by the trial court holding that costs including attorneys fees imposed by a mexican court did not constitute a penalty holding that absent evidence to the contrary court proceedings are presumed to be procedurally proper holding that the trial court erroneously imposed costs of prosecution and investigation absent proper requests and supporting documentation holding that moving costs are a proper element of damages