here we are dealing with parents who were minors at the time of the child’s birth. On that basis alone they logically and legally were unable to assert their rights until they reached their majority and without the financial aid of their parents. Mother, despite her minority, entered a contract with her parents relinquishing custody of child to them, thereby establishing them as custodial guardians of the child. By doing so, she bargained away child’s right to any possible financial or emotional support by his birth father. A parent cannot bargain away his or child’s rights. See e.g. McMichael v. McMichael, 700 A.2d 1337 (Pa.Super.1997); see also C.T.D., supra, citing Mastromatteo v. Harkins, 419 Pa.Super. 329, 615 A.2d 390, 394 (1992), appeal denied, 535 Pa. 648, 633 A.2d 152 (1993) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 12 Appellee, moreover, readily admits that
holding that the biological father was not entitled to notice of adoption proceeding where he failed to properly legitimate his child holding child is entitled to know and be supported financially and emotionally by his or her biological father holding that a child was not barred by a former statute of limitations applicable to actions to establish the existence of a father and child relationship when the current action was to establish the nonexistence of a father and child relationship and the presumed father no longer persisted in maintaining paternity holding biological father responsible under uniform parentage act for back child support notwithstanding stepparents support of child holding that unmarried father is entitled to show that he could not have reasonably expected his biological child to be born in utah after biological mother left california immediately prior to childs birth without informing father where birth would occur