for rehearing, but withdraw our decision of May 5, 2004, and substitute the following opinion. We affirm an order terminating the parental rights of D.H., the mother. D.H. argues that the minor nature of her failure to fully cooperate is insufficient to support termination based on a lack of compliance with a case plan. She relies upon cases where this court reversed orders terminating parental rights where, despite evidence of improvement, the terminations were based solely on the parents’ past conduct. See F.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 849 So.2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)(re-versing termination of parental rights as to seventh child where parental rights to previous six children had been terminated). See also J.F. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 866 So.2d 81 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)(<HOLDING>). We have considered these and similar cases
holding evidence supported terminating mothers parental rights under section d based in part on evidence that mother could not adequately protect or provide financially for children holding evidence supported termination of mothers parental rights where among other factors mother knowingly allowed abusive and sexually deviant father to have access to children recognizing this substantial interest in context of termination of parental rights recognizing that the department is required to present clear and convincing evidence to support termination of a parents parental rights holding that evidence did not support termination of parental rights to two children despite mothers prior conviction for killing her stepchild