of appeal on August 19, 2010, outside of the prescribed time. * * * The order denying the extension of time to file a notice of appeal is AFFIRMED; the motion to dismiss the appeal of the summary judgment is GRANTED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 . See Fed. R.App. P. 3(c)(1)(B). 2 . See Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5)(A)(ii). 3 . See Allied Steel, Gen. Contractor v. City of Abilene, 909 F.2d 139, 142 (5th Cir.1990) ("We review extensions of time under FRAP 4(a) for abuse of discretion.”) (citing Chipser v. Kohlmeyer & Co., 600 F.2d 1061, 1063 (5th Cir.1979)). 4 . Anderson v. Pasadena Ind. Sch. Dist., 184 F.3d 439, 447 (5th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). 5 . Fed. R.App. P.
holding that the filing of an opening brief within the time period for filing a notice of appeal could constitute notice of appeal holding that an untimely postjudgment motion does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal and that this court has no jurisdiction over an untimely filed appeal holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal after an untimely filing of a notice of appeal holding that an effective notice of appeal must be filed for this court to have jurisdiction to hear the case holding same as to the filing of a notice of an interlocutory appeal