conversations with third parties — which would undoubtedly constitute hearsay. The same is the case for the quoted portions of Ma’s declaration. Yet another example is the declaration of Avesta employee and former Morgan Stanley employee Johnson Lu, who asserts the following: I know that Morgan Stanley employee Kevin Long, my predecessor as manager of the Delphi group, demonstrated Delphi to consultant John McConnell in 1994. Lu Decl. ¶ 2. Defendants’ best intentions notwithstanding, this statement fails to disclose the basis for Lu’s knowledge and goes no distance towards establishing any prior art claims. Other submissions share similar infirmities, but in the interests of judicial economy these shall not be exhaustively detailed. Other evidence submitted by th 4-97 (W.D.N.Y.1998) (<HOLDING>) No evidence of any confidentiality provision
holding that in its review of the irs exercise of discretion the court is limited to a review of the administrative record holding that at this stage of the proceedings review is limited to a determination of whether the circuit court afforded due process and whether the court observed the essential requirements of law holding that a court may review a decision of the secretary of the army to determine whether he acted in excess of his statutory authority holding where tape corroborated by independent testimony of two police officers and where defendant did not challenge accuracy of recording court did not err in admitting tape despite prosecutions failure to authenticate it holding that inventors disclosure of video tape portraying his demonstration of his invention to the cochair of an industry conference with an understanding and expectation of confidentiality  with the limited purpose of review to determine whether it is accepted for presentation at a future scientific conference did not constitute public use under section 102b