with our sister circuits' treatment of this argument. See, e.g., United States v. Garcia-Lopez, 375 F.3d 586, 588 (7th Cir.2004) ("[T]he appropriate inquiry is whether the defendant had been convicted of a crime of violence at the time of deportation. Nothing in the guideline suggests that the analysis should consider whether the conviction has been vacated subsequent to the deportation but prior to the sentencing for the reentry offense.”); United States v. Luna-Diaz, 222 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2000) ("[T]he relevant time is the time of deportation ... and not the time of sentencing .... The guideline ... is in the past tense, which suggests that the present status of the aggravated felony conviction is irrelevant.”); United States v. Cisneros-Cabrera, 110 F.3d 746, 748 (10th Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 2 . The district court did not indicate which
holding that in determining whether a prior conviction is a violent felony a court generally must look only to the fact of conviction and the statutory definition of the prior offense holding that being deported after a conviction for an aggravated felony is all that is required and it is irrelevant whether the conviction is valid at the time of sentencing holding that felony conviction for which imposition of sentence was stayed could be counted as prior felony conviction under sentencing guidelines holding that proof of an agreement to commit a felony is not a necessary element in a conviction for the commission of the felony holding that conviction under  2702a3 or 4 is an aggravated felony under  101a43f