CURIAM. Stacy Scott appeals from the summary denial of her rule 3.800(a) motion, in which she seeks additional jail credit in two Putnam County cases. We affirm the trial court’s denial without prejudice to Scott’s right to seek additional jail credit in a sworn motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Petscher v. State, 936 So.2d 639, 639 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006) (Orfinger, J., concurring) (<HOLDING>). AFFIRMED. GRIFFIN, ORFINGER and LAWSON, JJ.,
holding that defendants 3850 motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as successive where the defendants current rule 3850 motion is one that could have or should have been raised in his first rule 3850 motion holding that claims raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred from consideration in a rule 3850 motion recognizing a claim for additional jail credit that cannot be resolved from the face of the record without resorting to factfinding may only be raised in a timely and legally sufficient rule 3850 motion holding that rule 3850 motion was not time barred where the order did not place any time limitation on when the defendant would refile his rule 3850 motion holding defendant was not barred from raising sentencing issue in rule 3850 motion by virtue of prior rule 3850 motion which did not raise any sentencing issues