the Legislature intended the statute to apply to unborn children. Hearing on H.B. 1351 Before the House Judiciary Comm., 58th N.D. Legis. Sess. (Jan. 22, 2003). This Court has held: ‘When the plain language of a statute is not ‘transparent,’ our codified rules of statutory interpretation direct us to look to the Code itself in determining the meaning of statutory terms.” N. X-Ray Co., Inc. v. State ex rel. Hanson, 542 N.W.2d 733, 735 (N.D.1996) (citing N.D.C.C. § 1-02-02). We review other provisions of the code to assist in the interpretation of N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-22.2(1)(b). Section 14-10-01, N.D.C.C., states: “Minors are persons under eighteen years of age. In this code, unless otherwise specified, the term ‘child’ means ‘minor’. Age must be calculated from the first minute 50 (1991) (<HOLDING>); Sheriff, Washoe Cnty. v. Encoe, 110 Nev.
holding that a reasonable jury could have concluded based on repeated references to the substance as cocaine and testimony from witnesses who had used the substances which they believed to be cocaine that substance was cocaine holding that possession of listed chemical with intent to manufacture controlled substance is controlled substance offense holding that mens rea required for possession of a controlled substance is knowledge that defendant possessed a controlled substance holding that quantity of the controlled substance does not have to be measurable to support a conviction for possession of such controlled substance particularly when the immeasurable amount of the substance is found on an implement used to consume the substance holding a pregnant woman who uses cocaine is not criminally liable for delivery of a controlled substance despite the possibility the drug may transfer to her infant postpartum via the umbilical cord