convictions that qualified as “violent felonies” under the ACCA and was therefore subject to a fifteen-year mandatory minimum sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). The district court sentenced Woods to 235 months. One of Woods’s three ACCA predicate offenses was a conviction for attempted burglary, which at the time qualified as a violent felony under the ACCA’s residual clause because it created a “serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). In Johnson, however, the Supreme Court held the ACCA’s residual clause was unconstitutionally vague. 135 S.Ct. at 2557. The government concedes that under Johnson, Woods’s conviction for attempted burglary is no longer a predicate offense under the ACCA. We may authorize a second or successive petition unde r.2015) (<HOLDING>); In re Rivero, 797 F.3d 986, 989 (11th
holding that cage has been made retroactive to cases on collateral review holding johnson announced a new substantive rule and prior supreme court holdings make it retroactive holding that until the supreme court rules otherwise apprendi is not a new rule of constitutional law made retroactive to cases on collateral review  that was previously unavailable holding that johnson is retroactive to the sentencing guidelines as the government has cited no case to support the proposition that a rule can be substantive in one context but procedural in another holding the supreme court has not held in a case or a combination of cases that the rule in johnson is retroactive to cases on collateral review and therefore it has not made johnson retroactive