power, but that is different from a hybrid regulation that delegates regulatory power. That the Department leaves open the number of procedures that an incumbent licensee may perform does not mean it delegates regulatory power to licensees. The restraint of trade is the licensing requirement — a barrier to entry — and it is complete upon enactment. The state imposes the licensing requirements. The state decides what the licensing requirements will be and whether they are met. The state does not delegate any aspect of need calculation to private parties. Admittedly, the state takes notice of whether incumbent providers are meeting the needs of the planning area, but that responsiveness to private activity does not amount to a hybrid restraint. See Fisher, 475 U.S. at 269, 106 S.Ct. 1045 (<HOLDING>). Rather, the Department has decided that
holding that the power to appoint and delete members of the committee now resides exclusively with the us trustee holding that the power of a constitutionally established court to punish for contempt may be regulated within reasonable bounds by the legislature but not to the extent that the courts power is substantially impaired or destroyed holding that the inherent power of the district court includes the power  to santion attorneys for  violations of court orders or other conduct which interferes with the courts power to manage its calendar and the courtroom   holding that despite the power of tenants to trigger enforcement of a regulated rent ceiling the rent levels were set exclusively by the state and the ceiling thus was a unilateral restraint recognizing power of appointment does not rest exclusively in any one branch