suspicion and because school officials had seen the student smoking out of a pipe. Kennedy I, 2000-NMSC-025, ¶ 17, 129 N.M. 436, 10 P.3d 115. Kennedy I’s predecessor, Kennedy v. Dexter Consol. Sch., 1998-NMCA-051, ¶ 13, 124 N.M. 764, 955 P.2d 693 (Kennedy II, rev’d in part on other grounds by Kennedy, 2000-NMSC-025, ¶¶ 20-22, 129 N.M. 436, 10 P.3d 115, similarly refers to out-of-state case law that do not involve a strip search to support this Court’s conclusion that individualized suspicion is ordinarily necessary for a search by school officials. See, e.g., DesRoches v. Caprio, 974 F.Supp. 542 (E.D.Va.1997) (backpack search for missing shoes); Burnham v. West, 681 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Va.1987) (search of pockets, purses, and bags); In re Doe, 11 Hawai'i 435, 887 P.2d 645, 655 (1994) (<HOLDING>). {17} In addition to the discussion of cases
holding that search of defendants purse which he carried was authorized by a warrant to search his person holding that bjecause a search of a students wallet purse or other bag carried on his or her person is undoubtedly a severe violation of subjective expectations of privacy  individualized suspicion is a necessary element in determining reasonableness where  the principal emptied the contents of the mjinors purse internal quotation marks and citation omitted holding that car passenger who left her purse in her boyfriends car had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the contents of her purse indeed a purse is a type of container in which a person possesses the highest expectations of privacy holding that a shoulder purse carried by a person at the time he is stopped lies within the scope of a warrant authorizing the search of his person holding that car passenger whose purse was found on floor behind drivers seat and searched had standing because a purse is clearly a container in which a person has a legitimate expectation of privacy