F.2d 106, 109 (5th Cir.1992); Fyfe v. Curlee, 902 F.2d 401 (5th Cir.1990). 6 . Superintendent Brezina reprimanded Janice Plowman, another faulty member on the ICC, because she attended a meeting of VHS teachers at a mall concerning Principal Porche. 7 . This case does not involve a mere administrative change in teaching assignments, but a midterm transfer to an entirely different school, and in Martin’s case, unfamiliar subjects and grade levels. 8 . Brezina testified in his deposition that the Plaintiffs turned their chairs facing away from the Principle Porche at this meeting in an act of defiance and disrespect to both the Principal and himself, but the Plaintiffs specifically denied these actions. 9 . Accord Green v. Philadelphia Housing Authority, 105 F.3d 882, 886 (3rd Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 10 . The outcome of this fact specific
holding public employees conduct and expression in internal investigation of employees at county prosecutors office to expose potential wrongdoing constituted matter of public concern recognizing a public employees first amendment right to address matters of legitimate public concern holding that a public employees deposition testimony involves a matter of public concern if arguably a statement about misconduct or corruption in city government and regardless of whether testimony is given in employees official capacity holding that the absence of a motivating desire to address a matter of public concern was not dispositive as to whether the speech addressed a matter of public concern holding that employees voluntary testimony is also inherently a matter of public concern