civil cases may not be inferred; rather it “must be provided for by the express terms of the statute in question.” Id. (citing First City Bank—Farmers Branch v. Guex, 677 S.W.2d 25, 30 (Tex.1984)). Next, the “Workers’ Compensation Act vests the power to award compensation benefits solely in the Workers’ Compensation Commission[ ], subject to judicial review.” American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Fodge, 63 S.W.3d 801, 803 (Tex.2001) (citing Saenz v. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, 925 S.W.2d 607, 612 (Tex.1996)). Furthermore, judicial review is “limited to issues decided by the commission’s appeals panel and on which judicial review is sought.” Tex. Labor Code Ann. § 410.302 (Vernon 2006); see Krueger v. Atascosa County, 155 S.W.3d 614, 619-20 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2004, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). And, the issues decided by the appeals panel
holding that issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal holding that issues not raised before the district court cannot be raised for the first time before this court holding that an issue not raised in the trial court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal holding that claimant could not assert the downs waiver contention in trial court having not raised issue before appeals panel holding a new constitutional challenge not raised in district court was not properly before court of appeals