the claim asserted nor the relief requested requires participation of individual members in the lawsuit.” Id. at 489 (internal citations omitted). In suits bought under the Establishment Clause, “direct and unwelcome” contact with the contested object demonstrates psychological injury in fact sufficient to confer standing. Id. at 489-90 (finding that plaintiff had sufficiently demonstrated standing to challenge Ten Commandments poster in defendant’s courtroom when “ACLU-Ohio ... identified member Bernard Davis, a lawyer who travels to and must practice law within DeWeese’s courtroom from time to time. There, Davis has and would continue to come into direct, unwelcome contact with the Ten Commandments display.”); Washegesic v. Bloomingdale Pub. Schs., 33 F.3d 679, 681-82 (6th Cir.1994) (<HOLDING>); Adland v. Russ, 307 F.3d 471, 478 (6th
holding that plaintiff had standing to challenge a portrait of jesus in the hallway of his high school even after graduation as plaintiff still visited the school and will confront the portrait whenever he is in the hall  plaintiff claimed that  he continued to suffer actual injury holding that even though the plaintiff failed to prove that he suffered a meaningful injury he was nevertheless entitled to nominal damages for the defendants violation of his first amendment rights holding that the burden is on the plaintiff holding that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged injuryinfact based on impact to sites that the plaintiff had visited in the past and planned to revisit each year in the future holding that the defendant did not deprive the plaintiff of a property interest in his continued employment because the plaintiff voluntarily resigned when he refused to report to work after being transferred to a new position