and other deferred compensation rights, and vested and nonvested military pensions eligible under the federal Uniformed Services Former Spouses’ Protection Act.” N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-20(b)(l) (2003). A trial court must value all marital and divisible property — collectively termed distributable property — in order to reasonably determine whether the distribution ordered is equitable. Turner v. Turner, 64 N.C. App. 342, 346, 307 S.E.2d 407, 409 (1983). Therefore, when no finding is made regarding the value of an item of distributable property, a trial court’s findings are insufficient even if a determination is made with respect to the percentage of a distributable property’s value to which each party is entitled. Byrd v. Owens, 86 N.C. App. 418, 421-22, 358 S.E.2d 102, 105 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50-20.1(b)
holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses prior statements relating to their trial testimony holding the trial court erred by failing to assign a promissory note value using traditional methods of tracing funds and simply distributing it by giving an 80 interest to defendant and 20 to plaintiff holding that the trial court erred by giving a misleading instruction holding that trial court erred by not allowing the plaintiff to introduce evidence of prior dealings with the defendant holding that the district court erred by failing to determine and deduct the actual value of securities received by fraud victims