urging that a bond-authorization measure be added to the ballot. • The Authority, however, determined to walk away from its contractual obligations, advising the Developers that it “already had satisfied” its obligation to seek voter approval to issue bonds for purchase of the Facilities. The Authority underscored its repudiation of its obligations under the Agreements in a written stipulation in another case in which it stated that it considered any obligation to include a bond-authorization measure to have been satisfied before September 2004. • Although it has disclaimed any further obligation to seek voter approval of bonds to purchase the Facilities, the Authority continues to use the Facilities, with no payment to the Developers. • As a re (Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1939, "writ refd) (<HOLDING>). Under the applicable standard of review, the
holding that appellant failed to establish abuse of discretion in dismissal of texas suit in which appellant failed to show georgia would refuse to apply texas law holding that where the entity was incorporated in texas and the shareholders reside in texas and the bankruptcy case is pending in texas texas law  not arizona law  should be applied holding that claim construction is a matter of law for the court to determine holding by texas supreme court that takings claim failed because as a matter of law developers consented to the city of tyler using the water and sewer facilities installed by developers holding by texas supreme court that takings claim failed as a matter of law because the state took possession of the property in question under a contract with the plaintiff and therefore with the plaintiffs permission and consent