. Section 90.401, Florida Statutes (1997), states: Relevant evidence is evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact. 4 . Section 90.403, Florida Statutes (1997), states, in pertinent part: Relevant evidence is inadmissible if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, misleading the jury, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence. 5 . The four criteria are applicable if the purpose of admitting the similar accident is to show notice or knowledge of a dangerous condition. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 411.2 (2007); Warn Indus. v. Geist, 343 So.2d 44, 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). 6 . Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 411.2 (2007); Jackson v. H.L. Bouton Co., 630 So.2d 1173, 1176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (<HOLDING>). 7 .Jackson, 630 So.2d at 1176; Lasar Mfg. Co.
holding that evidence of prior complaints raised fact question regarding defendants actual knowledge holding that no abuse of discretion occurred in admitting evidence regarding a lack of pri or complaints to establish defendants knowledge or lack thereof of a defect in the safety glasses that it produced or sold holding that lack of justiciable interest resulted in lack of standing to pursue claim and that lack of standing deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to act holding that this lack of any reasonable expectation of continued employment suffices to establish the lack of property in the constitutional sense and hence the lack of a viable due process claim holding that the governments lack of direct evidence as to defendants knowledge does not demonstrate that its case was baseless