houses east of Grandview instead of three houses west. Id. at 465. The warrant also contained accurate information describing the house — describing it as a “single family red brick ranch home” with a metal storage shed adjoining it — and incorporated an affidavit specifically identifying the owner of the home and the resident whose room the officers wished to search. Id. at 464-65. The court concluded that the warrant satisfied the Fourth Amendment’s purposes because circumstances made it “clear that the inaccuracies in the warrant here would not lead to a mistaken search of other premises.” Id. at 466. Here, the warrant adequately described Jerry Biles’s house, its location relative to other identifiable landmarks, and its owner, i.e., Jerry Biles. The officers e -02 (9th Cir.l985)(<HOLDING>). The warrant does not describe the shop; it
holding that since all of the buildings at 8670 jennings drive were within the curtilage of the property there was no need to demonstrate probable cause to search each building on the property holding common areas of a storage facility not entitled to reasonable expectation of privacy because any tenant could invite anyone in holding that for purposes of aerial surveillance using sophisticated equipment the open areas of an industrial or business complex are not analogous to the curtilage of a dwelling but falls somewhere between open fields and curtilage holding that a warrant commanding search of all buildings outbuildings garages yard areas trash containers storage areas and containers used in connection with or within the curtilage of said premises and buildings could include every structure on a 40acre ranch holding that a landlord has a duty of reasonable care over common areas or other areas over which the landlord has retained control