appropriate on the ground that the pornographic images Dean sent depicted “the commission of a sexual act or sexual contact.” Dean’s argument, however — that this enhancement does not apply to images depicting a person touching himself or herself — is unsupported by the text of the provision. Section 2G2.1(b)(2)(A) incorporates the definitions of “sexual act” and “sexual contact” in 18 U.S.C. § 2246. While “sexual act” requires that an image depict the touching “of another person,” 18 U.S.C. § 2246(b)(2), “sexual contact” requires only that the image depict the touching “of any person,” id. § 2246(b)(3) (emphasis added). Accordingly, the conduct depicted in Dean’s pictures unambiguously qualifies as “sexual contact.” See United States v. Pawlowski, 682 F.3d 205, 212-13 (3d Cir.2012) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Shafer, 573 F.3d 267, 273
holding that touching anus and touching genitals are separate offenses under penal code section 2211a1 holding that statute which defined sexual contact as any touching of the anus breast or any part of the genitals of another person with intent to arouse or gratify the sexual desire of any person was not vague holding that sexual contact unambiguously encompasses the touching of oneself holding that an abuse or molestation exclusion unambiguously covered claim of sexual touching even though terms abuse and molestation were not defined holding that taking indecent liberties with a child under 16 for sexual gratification constitutes sexual abuse of a minor even without physical contact