and the public interest. Accordingly, we hold that Congress acted within its power under the Copyright Clause when it imposed the carry one, carry all rule. The satellite carriers also argue that the carry one, carry all rule violates the Takings Clause. They claim that the rule works a per se taking under Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419, 102 S.Ct. 3164, 73 L.Ed.2d 868 (1982), because it limits their right to exclude the unwanted signals of local television stations from their property. The argument fails because the Supreme Court has made clear that a per se taking under Loretto must involve “required acquiescence” in a permanent physical occupation of property. See FCC v. Florida Power Corp., 480 U.S. 245, 251-53, 107 S.Ct. 1107, 94 L.Ed.2d 282 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Here, the statute does not require the
holding that retention of some access rights  does not preclude a per se taking holding that pole attachments act does not effect a per se taking because it does not require utility companies to provide space on their utility poles to cable companies holding that new york law granting cable television companies right to place wires across private property worked a taking of private property holding that a new york law requiring building owners to permit cable companies to install cable facilities on their premises constituted a taking holding that mccarranferguson act does not apply to arizona laws regulating relationship between insurance companies and their shareholders