extends interlocutory review to denials of Parker immunity, does not do so in cases involving private parties. See Acoustic Sys., Inc. v. Wenger Corp., 207 F.3d 287, 292 (5th Cir.2000). Stressing the Supreme Court’s repeated admonitions that the collateral order doctrine applies only to a narrow class of cases, the court in Acoustic Systems concluded the justifications for affording immediate review of the denial of Parker immunity to governmental entities are inapplicable to private parties. Id. at 291-93. The court also noted that in the context of qualified immunity, immediate appeal is available to governmental defendants but not private parties. Id. at 294 (citing authority from the First, Seventh, and Eighth Circuits); see also Weise v. Casper, 507 F.3d 1260, 1264 (10th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). The Fifth Circuit indicated it was unaware of
recognizing that this court considers only legal questions when considering interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity holding in pertinent part that this court lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal holding that an interlocutory appeal lies from a denial of summary judgment on a qualified immunity claim holding court lacked jurisdiction to hear interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to dismiss based on qualified immunity by defendants who were not public officials holding that the court lacked jurisdiction over statelaw tort claims on an interlocutory appeal from a denial of qualified immunity