is, against the manifest weight of the evidence. Id. at paragraph four of the syllabus. Consequently, the trial court’s judgment will not be reversed if it is supported by some competent and credible evidence. Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. Selz (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 169, 6 OBR 227, 451 N.E.2d 1203. In his first assignment of error, appellant argues that the trial court’s determination that he failed to provide for the maintenance and support of his child was against the manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant asserts that the evidence showed that he made $329.40 in support payments during the year preceding the adoption petition in addition to $53 per week he paid to provide health care coverage for his children. This case presents us with an opportunity to 670, 647 N.E.2d 251 (<HOLDING>); In re Adoption of Carletti (1992), 78 Ohio
holding that natural parents consent for an adoption is required so long as the parent complies with the duty to support for any period during the oneyear preceding the filing of the adoption petition holding that parties not related to the child could not file an adoption petition and later prove the unfitness of the natural parents because the child was not available for adoption as defined in the adoption act parents had to be found unfit before petition could be filed holding that a single partial payment of 36 within the oneyear period prior to the filing of the adoption petition qualified as support and maintenance requiring natural parents consent as prerequisite to adoption holding prior to adoption of child support guidelines that a credit was discretionary holding that single partial payment of 20 within the oneyear period prior to the filing of the adoption petition was de minimis and did not make natural parents consent necessary for the adoption