Duchesneau v. Cornell Univ., No. 08^1856, 2009 WL 533064 (E.D.Pa. Mar.3, 2009); Kendall v. Trs. of Amherst Coll., No. 06-4983, 2007 WL 172396, *5 (E.D.Pa. Jan.18, 2007); Fox v. Bd. of Supervisors of La. State Univ. and Agrie. & Mech Coll., 576 So.2d 978, 985 (La.1991). Second, Ocean World argues that the distance learning program, the Columbia Video Network, is sufficient to confer general jurisdiction over Columbia, because the school is doing business on the internet and soliciting students from Florida. However, Columbia is correct that its internet program does not satisfy the requirements of section 48.193(2) because it does not amount to “substantial and not isolated activity within this state.” (Emphasis added). Only two students wit 4 So.2d 111, 723 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>); Hobbs v. Don Mealey Chevrolet, Inc., 642
holding defendant had requisite contacts under section 481932 florida statutes where it solicited consulting and other services from a florida corporation in which a substantial amount of the services sought by defendant were performed in florida holding that nonresident individual defendants business contacts with florida as a distributor for two corporations with offices in florida forover a threeyear period brought her within the ambit of section 481932 holding that defendants bank account and open line of credit in florida utilized to transfer money in international commerce was insufficient to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 florida statutes where defendant operated its business in honduras had no employees or agents in florida and did not advertise or solicit business in florida holding defendants who operated a boat tour in the bahamas for which tickets are sold by floridabased cruise lines on board their vessels did not have the level of business in florida to confer jurisdiction under section 481932 holding that a claim based on a cruise lines negligent mode of operation under florida law is not cognizable under federal admiralty law