of a defendant’s residence when the arrest is made just outside the suspect[’]s residence. ¶91 The footnote in Hopkins states, in pertinent part: Buie specifically addressed an arrest inside a person’s home, but other courts have expanded its rationale to areas just outside a residence. See United States v. Henry, 48 F.3d 1282, 1284 (D.C. Cir. 1995). Hopkins, 113 Wn. App. at 959 n.3. ¶92 The court erred in concluding the police had the authority to conduct a protective sweep of the house incident to arrest for two reasons. First, a warrantless search of “spaces immediately adjoining the place of arrest” without probable cause or reasonable suspicion does not apply when the police arrest an individual outside his home. See United States v. White, 748 F.3d 507, 511-12 (3d Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Archibald, 589 F.3d 289,
holding that buie permitted a search of an open storage unit when the suspect was arrested immediately outside holding the buie prong 1 exception is not available where the arrest took place just outside the home  holding the search of defendants home took place within the time designated in the warrant and later examination of computer disks seized did not make the search unconstitutional holding that arrest took place inside home even though officers did not physically enter residence to place suspect in custody holding that the doorway of the home is a public place for purposes of the warrant requirement of the fourth amendment