in the closet, but she was unsure whether there was any women’s clothing. As to this contraband, the trial court found that Mr. Ford violated community control condition (7) by possessing drugs not prescribed by a physician. The State failed to prove constructive possession of the marijuana-filled jar and scale. The bedroom in which they were found was jointly occupied. The contraband was concealed from view in the bedroom closet. The State did not present any independent proof of Mr. Ford’s knowledge of the presence of or his ability to exercise control over the marijuana and scale discovered in the apartment, and thus the circuit court erred in finding a violation of community control condition (7) based upon Mr. Ford’s possession of this contraband. See Wagner, 950 So.2d at 513 (<HOLDING>); Diaz, 884 So.2d at 389; Loyd, 677 So.2d at
holding that the twolevel enhancement was appropriate where the gun cash and a drug ledger were found in one apartment and the drugs were found in a different apartment in the same building holding that evidence supported finding of constructive possession of concealed narcotics in part because narcotics paraphernalia was found in residence holding evidence insufficient to establish defendant had physical or constructive possession of heroin when no drugs were found on his person and the only drugs discovered on the premises which he shared with the codefendant were secreted out of plain view holding no constructive possession where drugs found in shared apartment concealed under dresser in mens pockets of mens clothing in closet and in cigar box and no independent evidence showed items belonged to defendant holding that statements by defendant and apartment manager that defendant lived in the apartment where drugs were found demonstrated his control over the apartment even though no documents personal effects or keys were found