responsible for the purchase of goods and services, but the decisions of its director are subject to review by the Director of GSA and the County Manager. See Administrative Order 3-2. In view of this hierarchy, the undersigned concludes that the individual defendants in their capacities as department directors are not final policymakers because their decisions are subject to review by the County Manager and the Board. This conclusion is supported by the Eleventh Circuit and other courts within this district which have addressed similar issues. See Manor Healthcare Corp. v. Lomelo, 929 F.2d 633 (11th Cir.1991) (City not held liable for the acts of its mayor because his decisions were subject to review by the City Council); Lawrence v. Metro Dade County, 872 F.Supp. 957 (S.D.Fla.1994) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, the undersigned finds no basis
holding that the courts jurisdiction is limited to the appeal of final board decisions that are adverse to the claimant holding that county and district attorneys are officers within the judicial department holding that this courts review of board decisions is limited to final orders or final decisions holding that director of the police department is not a final policymaking official because his decisions are constrained by the county manager the board and administrative order and polices holding that director of police department does not have final policymaking authority in miamidade county despite having some discretionary authority