recognized that the application of § 1988 "is limited to cases arising under our civil rights laws, a category of cases in which attorneys’ fees have traditionally been regarded as appropriate.” Id., at 5912. The federal courts have consistently held that in order to recover fees under § 1988 a party must bring an action to enforce one of the civil rights enumerated therein. In the recent case of Lauritzen v. Secretary of the Navy, 546 F. Supp. 1221, 1224 (C.D. Cal. 1982) it was held: Plaintiff did not bring this action to enforce any of the specific provisions (i.e., § 1981, etc.) enumerated in § 1988. Instead, she claimed a right to relief directly under the United States Constitution and under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (<HOLDING>). See also Davis v. Passman, 422 U.S. 228, 99
holding that the government may not introduce evidence obtained through violations of the fourth amendment recognizing private damage action for fourth amendment violations by federal officers recognizing an implied fourth amendment action for damages recognizing private right of action recognizing that no private right of action exists for subsection a violations