and tingling in both arms. Id. at 76-77. She had used special arm rests at her past jobs. Id. at 92-93. She maintains that the permanent restrictions on using her hands and arms Dr. Fry identified in 1993, id. at 232, triggered the ALJ’s duty to develop the record. However, Ms. Williams continued to work as a legal secretary and paralegal for over six years after the permanent restrictions were imposed. Therefore, Dr. Fry’s 1993 report was. insufficient “to suggest a reasonable possibility that a severe impairment exist[ed].” Hawkins, 113 F.3d at 1167. The objective medical evidence in the record is insufficient to indicate the presence of a severe neurological or upper-extremity impairment. Consequently, the ALJ was not required to develop the record. Cf. Carter, 73 F.3d at 1021-22 (<HOLDING>). Failure to Explain Evidence Omitted from
holding that remand was not required and that the aljs failure to mention treating physicians opinion was harmless error because the alj adopted the treating physicians recommendations holding that the testimony of a nonexamining medical advisor does not constitute evidence sufficient to override the treating physicians diagnosis holding that a treating physicians diagnosis could be rejected for specific and legitimate reasons that are supported by substantial evidence in the record holding physicians diagnosis of depression required further development even though claimants application did not mention depression holding that the alj erred in failing to give the findings and assessments of the treating physicians any weight when the medical evidence and claimants testimony supported a diagnosis of cfs