accommodation claims because she had failed to create a genuine issue of fact as to whether she is disabled under the ADA and the PWDCRA. The court correctly held that, because Plaintiff failed to show that she was a qualified individual with a disability, MGM had no duty to accommodate Plaintiff under those statutes. On appeal, Plaintiff has not challenged the district court’s dismissal of her wrongful discharge claim, nor has she raised it in her statement of issues, perhaps because her notice of appeal challenged only the court’s denial of her motion for reconsideration, which challenged only the finding that she was not disabled. Thus, she has waived the wrongful discharge issue on appeal. See, e.g., Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Sys., Inc., 176 F.3d 369, 376 (6th Cir.1999) (<HOLDING>). In any event, we are satisfied that the
holding that generally arguments not briefed on appeal are deemed abandoned or waived holding issues raised in notice of appeal but not briefed are deemed waived holding issues not adequately briefed on appeal are abandoned holding that issues not briefed are deemed abandoned recognizing that arguments not briefed on appeal are waived