the most stringent and complete requirements of the state where the mother previously resided or was located, in order to protect and preserve his parental interest and right in the child in cases of adoption. Utah Code Ann. § 78-30-4.15(4). C.F. directs our attention to subpart (d) and points out that Washington State does not require an unmarried father to commence a paternity action to fully establish his constitutional parental rights. However, even if this is true, C.F. has still failed to strictly meet all the other requirements as required by the statute. ¶ 31 For example, section 78-30-4.15(4)(b) requires that the mother leave her resident state without informing the father where she is going or how she can be located. See Ellis v. L.D.S. Soc. Servs., 615 P.2d 1250 (Utah 1980) (<HOLDING>). Despite the fact that C.F.’s brief states
holding that although husband and wife were both fit and proper persons to have custody of the child custody in a dissolution action should have been awarded to wife the biological parent in light of blood test showing that husband was not the childs biological father holding that unmarried father is entitled to show that he could not have reasonably expected his biological child to be born in utah after biological mother left california immediately prior to childs birth without informing father where birth would occur recognizing dual paternity where biological father has actual relationship with child or has been prevented from forming relationship by mother and acts to establish paternity within a reasonable time of childs birth he may use compulsory blood test in avowal action holding child is entitled to know and be supported financially and emotionally by his or her biological father holding that the biological father was not entitled to notice of adoption proceeding where he failed to properly legitimate his child