(4th Cir.1995); EEOC v. Hansa Products, Inc., 844 F.2d 191, 192 n. 1 (4th Cir.1988). The Virginia Council on Human Rights is charged with administering the provisions of the Virginia Human Rights Act (“VHRA”), Va.Code § 2.1-714 et seq. Virginia is a “deferral state” and the Virginia Council on Human Rights is a “deferral agency.” Tinsley v. First Union Nat’l Bank, 155 F.3d 435 (4th Cir.1998); Capps v. City of Lynchburg, 67 F.Supp.2d 589, 590 (W.D.Va.1999). Although Virginia law does not create a specific cause of action for disability discrimination, the VHRA broadly prohibits discriminatory employment practices and allows the VCHR to investigate claims of discrimination, bringing it within the parameters of § 2000e-5(c). Tinsley, 155 F.3d at 440. Thus, for this C d 501 (W.D.Va.1999) (<HOLDING>). This case presents a slightly-different
holding that the pleading standard set forth in twombly applies to all civil actions holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to among other things set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements holding that plaintiff had no jurisdiction in federal court because she failed to allege a state law claim but declining to discuss pleading requirement to set forth charge of discrimination holding that because the plaintiff did not allege facts indicating what specific medical information she provided to dps she failed to state a constitutional claim holding that a plaintiff had not established a prima facie case of race discrimination because she failed to show valid comparators and presented no other circumstantial evidence of discrimination