Miller, 622 F.3d at 538., While expressing its view that HCEA should inform principals and assistant principals of their altered status under PECCA, the Board did not dictate whether HCEA could accept principals and assistant principals as members. In fact,, the letter explicitly recognized that “if an administrator wants to continue to pay dues to [an employee] organization, including HCEA, they certainly may.” Similarly, the letter’s request that HCEA refrain from making comments the Board rightly or wrongly believed to be improper did not constitute a “a general prohibition against certain forms of advocacy,” nor did it “imposte] sanctions for the expression of particular views.” Ark. State Highway Emps., 441 U.S. at 464, 99 S.Ct. 1826. Rather ., 623 F.2d 1155, 1159 (6th Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>). HCEA suggests that the Board’s letter
holding that a collective bargaining agreement between school board and teachers union established a teachers legitimate claim of entitlement to their positions at elementary school holding that a students right to bodily integrity under the fourteenth amendment encompasses a students right to be free from sexual assaults by his or her teachers holding that a reprimand letter sent in response to a teachers union representation of a fellow employees grievance infringed on the teachers right of free association holding board did not fail to disclose exculpatory information in violation of teachers due process rights holding that the district was not liable under respondeat superior for a teachers sexual assault of a student even though it occurred on school grounds and during school hours because the criminal misconduct was not within the scope of the teachers employment