property by will is a devise.” (Emphasis added.) Black’s Law Dictionary 517 (9th ed. 2009). Notably, section 20 — 19(a) of the Probate Act, which clearly only applies to real property, does not rely on traditional terminology and does not specifically reference property that is “devised”; rather, it refers to real estate that is “specifically bequeathed” even though the traditional use of the term “bequeath” refers to personal, rather than real, property. 755 ILCS 5/20—19(a) (West 2006). Indeed, if one were to strictly adhere to the historical definition of “bequest,” its usage in the statute would be illogical because that section clearly refers to the payment of real estate taxes. See Antioch Community High School District 17 v. Board of Education, 373 Ill. App. 3d 544, 552 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Although this provision was perhaps
holding that when interpreting statute court must avoid a conclusion that  is not supported when construing every part or section of the statute and would yield an absurd result holding that the dominant rule to be observed in construction of statute is to give effect to intention of legislature recognizing that the cardinal rule in statutory construction is to give effect to the intent of the legislature and to avoid construing a statute in a manner that produces an absurd unjust or unreasonable result recognizing the legal concept that when interpreting a statute it is presumed that the legislature did not intend an absurd or unreasonable result holding that a statute cannot be construed in a manner that would lead to an absurd or unreasonable result