32 (1995) (internal quotations omitted). This court further recognized the type of inherent authority that allows a circuit court to grant a new trial in the interest of justice, stating "[t]he inherent power of the court is ... the power to administer justice whether any previous form of remedy has been granted or not... and the power to provide process where none exists." Cannon, 196 Wis. at 536 (quoting In re Bruen, 172 P. 1152 (Wash. 1918)). We have established that, even on its own motion, a circuit court has the inherent authority to grant a new trial when an injustice has occurred. Fontaine, 205 Wis. at 577 ("It has long been settled in this state that the court has power to grant a new trial in the interests of justice upon its own motion."); In re Noe's Estate, 241 Wis. at 177 (<HOLDING>); Behning, 57 Wis. 2d at 188 (recognizing a
holding that when the district court improperly purported to transfer to the circuit court an action over which the circuit court lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction the circuit court was without jurisdiction to enter its judgment which was void and dismissing the appeal from that void judgment holding a circuit courts authority to grant a new trial is so necessary to the judicial process and so essential to fair trials that its existence is a necessary incident to the exercise of judicial power by the circuit court holding that trial courts have the power to sanction parties for bad faith abuse of the judicial process not covered by rule or statute holding that a transfer order issued by a district court in another circuit is reviewable only in the circuit of the transferor district court holding that at this stage of the proceedings review is limited to a determination of whether the circuit court afforded due process and whether the court observed the essential requirements of law