A few days after Villavicencio started work ing at P.S. 191, Capolongo told Villavieen-cio to come to her office with a United Federation of Teachers (“UFT”) representative because the meeting could lead to disciplinary action. Id. ¶ 40. The UFT chapter leader advised Villavicencio to leave the school because “[Capolongo and her friends] are after you.” Id. ¶ 41. Claimed is that, in May 2009, the experiences with Gure-Perez and Capolango led Villavicencio to take medical lea 167, 179-81, 125 S.Ct. 1497, 161 L.Ed.2d 361 (2005) (finding that a school coach could assert a retaliation claim even though he was not a victim of the discrimination that was the subject of his original complaints); • Sullivan v. Little Hunting Park, Inc., 396 U.S. 229, 237, 90 S.Ct. 400, 24 L.Ed.2d 386 (1969) (<HOLDING>); • Albert v. Carovano, 851 F.2d 561, 572-73
holding that an individual can waive any process to which he or she has a right holding that the district court did not err in failing to address the defendant personally to determine whether she understood the rights she was waiving by admitting that she violated the conditions of her probation holding that an accused should not have to fear even the possibility that he or she will suffer a penalty for exercising his or her rights holding that a person has standing to bring suit under the civil rights act if she or he can show that she or he was punished for trying to vindicate the rights of minorities holding that a plaintiff can show that she is qualified by presenting credible evidence that she continued to possess the objective qualifications she held when she was hired