the non-moving party and indulge all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor. See O’Connor v. Steeves, 994 F.2d 905, 907 (1st Cir.1993). “If, after viewing the record in the non-moving party’s favor, the Court determines that no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, summary judgment is appropriate.” Walsh v. Town of Lakeville, 431 F.Supp.2d 134, 143 (D.Mass.2006). B. WCT’s Claim Against Ms. Pino “The financial obligations of a unit owner,” including the obligation to pay common expenses assessed by a condominium association are established by Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 183A, §§ 6, 7 and “are covenants running with the land.” Trustees of the Prince Condominium Trust v. Prosser, 412 Mass. 723, 725, 592 N.E.2d 1301, 1302 (1992) (<HOLDING>). “[A] condominium unit owner may not decline
holding that there is no right to a setoff against a lawfully imposed condominium charge holding that there is no right of recovery against individual defendants under the ada holding that there is no constitutional right to appeal a criminal conviction holding that there is no federal or colorado constitutional right to postconviction counsel but there is a limited statutory right holding that there is no due process right to appellate review