limitations enumerated by state agency consultant Frank Lahman, including that Bain was moderately limited in her ability to accept instructions and respond appropriately to criticism from supervisors and moderately limited in her ability to respond appropriately to changes in the work setting. Accordingly, on remand the ALJ must also address these limitations. c. Nurse Stout The ALJ did not err in discrediting the opinion of treating nurse practitioner Deborah Stout. Although Stout consults with a psychiatrist every two weeks and participates in a peer supervision group with a psychologist, this is not the type of physician supervision that our case law requires in order to consider a nurse practitioner an acceptable medical source. See Gomez v. Chater, 74 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). Because Stout is not an acceptable medical
holding that a nurse practitioners opinion constituted an acceptable medical source where the nurse worked closely under the supervision of the doctor such that the nurse was acting as an agent of the doctor holding that nurse who is familiar with the standard of care at another similar hospital can qualify by experience to testify as a medical expert in a medical malpractice action holding jury was warranted in finding hospital negligent in its selection and retention of a nurse after the nurse violated hospital rules and had been repeatedly reprimanded but not fired holding expert report requirement fulfilled in claim against nurse by providing expert report of nurse as to standard of care and expert report of medical doctor as to causation holding that a question of fact existed regarding whether the hospital held the doctor out as its agent if the hospital provided the doctor without explicitly informing the patient that the doctor was not its employee