in discovery and preparation for trial, and would delay the resolution of the matter. An unfair competition claim would introduce new issues about PBS Inc.’s Magic Blind and the public’s perception of the product. PBS Inc.’s motion for leave to add an unfair competition claim is therefore denied. CONCLUSION For ch a rigid approach, "a focus on standing may lead a court to refuse application of the ameliorating rules that enables substitution of the real party in interest when the wrong plaintiff filed the action.” 13A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure § 3531 (3d ed.2011). 4 . The cases cited by CHF to argue that PBS Inc.’s complaint should be dismissed with prejudice are inapplicable. See Hernandez v. Conriv Realty Assocs., 116 F.3d 35, 41 (2d Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>); Burnette v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co.,
holding that a district court has discretion to dismiss claims with prejudice because of a plaintiffs various procedural violations recognizing a trial courts inherent authority to dismiss a cause of action with prejudice for violations of court orders recognizing district courts inherent authority to dismiss with prejudice for abuse of judicial process holding that district court has discretion when deciding to convert a defendants motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment holding that wjithout jurisdiction the claims court cannot presume to dismiss the complaint with prejudice