the BOP accepts that there are a number of legitimate penological interests for restricting inmates[’] access to R-rated movies.”).) Among the other governmental interests that are allegedly furthered by the R-rated movie prohibition are institutional security and order as well as inmate rehabilitation. . It is well recognized that maintaining prison security and order and furthering the rehabilitation of inmates are legitimate governmental interests. See Fraise, 283 F.3d at 516 (“It is ... beyond dispute that New Jersey has a legitimate penological interest in maintaining order and security within the prison system.”)(citing O’Lone v. Estate of Shabazz, 482 U.S. 342, 350-51, 107 S.Ct. 2400, 96 L.Ed.2d 282 (1987), and Turner, 482 U.S. at 91-92, 107 S.Ct. 2254); Ramirez, 379 F.3d at 128 (<HOLDING>) (quoting O’Lone, 482 U.S. at 348, 107 S.Ct.
recognizing a core first amendment interest in the dissemination of information relating to alleged governmental misconduct holding prisoners have protected liberty interest in continued participation in rehabilitation programs based on the reformation clause recognizing governmental interest in rehabilitation holding section 1010215 does not waive governmental immunity merely because a governmental action falls within the listed governmental functions thus further inquiry under the act is necessary recognizing the protection of preliminary governmental materials