in the Brownlee murder; and (10) Deputy U.S. Marshal Moran’s testimony about Williams’ appearance on Crimestoppers and America’s Most Wanted. Two of these items of evidence were independently corroborated by admissible evidence. First, Johnny Hankins corrobo rated Capote’s testimony concerning the Palmetto Expressway murders, recounting a conversation in which Williams confided that he and Casado killed several individuals on an expressway. Second, Lewis’s testimony concerning Stit’s role as “an enforcer” for Williams was corroborated by Becton, who testified that both he and Stit worked for Williams in Virginia. This independent testimony mitigates the prejudicial effect of the inadmissible Lewis and Capote testimony. Cf. United States v. DeLoach, 654 F.2d 763, 771 (D.C.Cir.1980) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, the cumulative effect of the
holding that the admission of expert testimony was prejudicial where the testimony was pervasive holding that admission of hearsay was harmless where strong circumstantial evidence established the same facts holding that admission of hearsay testimony was harmless where the jury heard admissible testimony from three other sources to the same effect holding harmless the improper admission of a social workers hearsay testimony concerning a childs report of sexual abuse where the credibility of the childs testimony was supported by other witnesses holding that admission of prior statement constituted error but was harmless when other admissible evidence established the same fact