Nevada Board of Medical Examiners are entitled to absolute immunity for their quasi-judicial acts. ' C. Scope of Absolute Immunity for the Nevada Board of Medical Examiners Even if the Board Members generally function in capacities comparable to those of judges and prosecutors, the protections of absolute immunity reach only those actions that are judicial or closely associated with the judicial process. See Buckley v. Fitzsimmons, 509 U.S. 259, 273, 113 S.Ct. 2606, 125 L.Ed.2d 209 (1993) (“A prosecutor’s administrative duties and those investigatory functions that do not relate to an advocate’s preparation for the initiation of a prosecution or for judicial proceedings are not entitled to absolute immunity.”); Forrester v. White, 484 U.S. 219, 229, 108 S.Ct. 538, 98 L.Ed.2d 555 (1988) (<HOLDING>). There is no question that acts occurring
holding selsky entitled to absolute immunity holding that an officer applying for a warrant without probable cause may be entitled to qualified immunity but is not entitled to absolute immunity holding that a judge was not entitled to absolute immunity for firing an employee holding selsky not entitled to absolute immunity holding by a 21 vote that an ohio probate judge was entitled to absolute immunity for filing a criminal complaint