Best v. State, 118 S.W.3d 857, 861 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.). 3 . State v. Ross, 32 S.W.3d 853, 855 (Tex.Crim.App.2000); State v. Ballard, 987 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). 4 . Carmouche, 10 S.W.3d at 327; Guzman v. State, 955 S.W.2d 85, 89 (Tex.Crim.App.1997). 5 . Ford, 158 S.W.3d at 493; Carmouche, 10 S.W.3d at 327-28. 6 . Kothe v. State, 152 S.W.3d 54, 61 (Tex.Crim.App.2004); Carmouche, 10 S.W.3d at 327-28; Guzman, 955 S.W.2d at 87. 7 . Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 9, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1873, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968) (citing Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 222, 80 S.Ct. 1437, 1446, 4 L.Ed.2d 1669 (1960)). 8 . Id. a 59 Cal.Rptr. 191, 601 P.2d 207, 212 (1979) (noting warrant check permissible if stop not extended solely for that purpose); Jackson, 39 P.3d at 1190 (<HOLDING>). 60 . But see Tucker, 183 S.W.3d at 509
holding that passenger conduct can be a factor supporting reasonable suspicion holding warrant check not unreasonable where detention not extended solely for that purpose holding that requests for identification of all occupants explanation of presence in area and warrant check was within reasonable scope of detention holding detention of passenger for warrant check violated fourth amendment absent reasonable suspicion holding arrest of individual for refusal to identify violated fourth amendment absent particularized and objective suspicion of criminal activity on his part