v. Nicolau, 951 S.W.2d 444, 451 (Tex.1997). For an instruction to be proper, it must (1) assist the jury, (2) accurately state the law, and (3) find support in the pleadings and the evidence. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, 942 S.W.2d 712, 721 (Tex.App. —Dallas 1997, no writ). As discussed in section H.B., TDPRS provided adequate evidence that it developed numerous service plans to help Kristin get K.M.B. returned. The trial court properly determined that TDPRS presented sufficient evidence to instruct the jury on constructive abandonment under section 161.001 of the family code. Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 161.001(1)(N). The instruction assisted the jury in reaching its verdict and accurately tracked the language of the statute. See Tex. Dept. of Human Servs., 802 S.W.2d at 649 (<HOLDING>). Given the broad latitude that trial courts
holding that the court did not abuse its discretion by tracking the statutory language in the instruction holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by granting such a temporary injunction holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in its ruling whether to proceed with a declaratory judgment action holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to give a mere inspection instruction in a firearm possession case holding trial court did not abuse its discretion by ruling based only on affidavits