review the grant or denial of summary judgment de novo. See Union Pacific R.R. v. Greentree Trans. Trucking Co., 293 F.3d 120 (3d Cir.2002). In considering a motion for summary judgment, the court must draw all reasonable inferences in the manner most favorable to the non-moving party. See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). II. Discussion There is no affirmative right to governmental aid or protection under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. DeShaney, 489 U.S. at 196, 109 S.Ct. 998. The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment provides that “[n]o State shall ... deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” U.S. Const. Amend. XIV. Nothing in the language of t 2, 31 L.Ed.2d 36 (1972) (<HOLDING>). The Constitution protects people from the
recognizing provisions of the fair housing act that forbid false statements that housing is unavailable to a person because of his race holding that the state has no obligation to provide adequate housing holding that adequate alternative state remedy must provide the possibility of relief under the circumstances holding that government has obligation to provide for health needs of incarcerated prisoners holding that the state has no obligation to fund abortions or other medical services