of the fraud which gives rise to the predicate offense.” Blount Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Walter E. Heller & Co., 819 F.2d 151, 152 (6th Cir.1987). Under Rule 9(b), “[i]n alleging fraud or mistake a party must state with particularity the circumstances constituting fraud or mistake.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). To satisfy the rule, a party must “ ‘allege the time, place, and content of the alleged misrepresentation on which he or she relied; the fraudulent scheme; the fraudulent intent of [the other party]; and the injury resulting from the fraud.’ ” Coffey v. Foamex L.P., 2 F.3d 157, 161-62 (6th Cir.1993) (quoting Ballan v. Upjohn Co., 814 F.Supp. 1375, 1385 (W.D.Mich.1992)); see also Vild v. Visconsi, 956 F.2d 560, 567 (6th Cir.1992); Bender v. Southland Corp., 749 F.2d 1205, 1216 (6th Cir.1984) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, RICO defines an “enterprise” as
holding that pleading fraud with particularity in this circuit requires time place and contents of the false representations as well as the identity of the person making the misrepresentation and what that person obtained thereby  holding that if the alleged misrepresentations are material a plaintiff is entitled to recovery whether or not the misrepresentations caused the alleged damage holding that a rico plaintiff must allege at a minimum the time place and content of the alleged misrepresentations on which he or she relied the fraudulent scheme the fraudulent intent of the defendants and the injury resulting from the fraud holding that each element required under the act must be included in the written notice and each element must be sufficiently clear and accurate  holding that as to each predicate act the plaintiff must allege the time place and contents of the misrepresentations