omitted); see also DeYoung v. State, 268 Ga. 780, 787 (7) (493 SE2d 157) (1997). 8 Manzione v. State, 312 Ga. App. 638, 640 (719 SE2d 533) (2011); see also Whitten v. State, 174 Ga. App. 867, 868 (1) (331 SE2d 912) (1985); Illinois v. Gates, 462 U. S. 213, 238 (III) (103 SCt 2317, 76 LE2d 527) (1983). 9 Palmer, 285 Ga. at 79 (punctuation omitted); see also Sullivan v. State, 284 Ga. 358, 361 (667 SE2d 32) (2008) (same). 10 Macias v. State, 292 Ga. App. 225, 229 (2) (a) (664 SE2d 265) (2008) (punctuation omitted); accord State v. Brantley, 264 Ga. App. 152, 154 (589 SE2d 716) (2003). 11 Marlow v. State, 288 Ga. 769, 770 (2) (707 SE2d 95) (2011) (punctuationomitted); accord State v. Staley, 249 Ga. App. 207, 209 (548 SE2d 26) (2001). 12 See Macias, 292 Ga. App. at 229-30 (2) (a) (<HOLDING>); Ibekilo v. State, 277 Ga. App. 384, 384-85
holding that there was sufficient probable cause to search a defendants residence after evidence of drug dealing was found in his car during a traffic stop that was conducted when the defendant was coming from his residence and noting that under such circumstances a practical commonsense conclusion could be made that the drugs and money had been at the defendants residence a short time before the stop holding that evidence was insufficient to prove constructive possession where the defendant was in jail at the time the drugs were seized from his residence holding that defendant was not in custody during search of his residence holding evidence was sufficient to support conviction for pfdcf where defendant was arrested immediately outside his residence and an unloaded handgun was found in the residence under the defendants bed and in the same room as the controlled substances and cash holding that a warrant authorizing the search of a residence vehicles at the residence and all persons found in the residence was not overly broad given that search was limited to places were drugs or weapons might be found