our Court held that the officer in Fleming had only a “generalized suspicion that the defendant was engaged in criminal activity, based upon the time, place, and the officer’s knowledge that defendant was unfamiliar in the area.” Id. The defendant’s actions “were not sufficient to create a reasonable suspicion that [the] defendant was involved in criminal conduct, it being neither unusual nor suspicious that [the defendant] chose to walk in á direction which led away from [a] group of officers.” Fleming, 106 N.C. App. at 170-71, 415 S.E.2d at 785. In the present case, the dispatch did not allege that the “suspicious person” was engaged in any criminal activity. Cf. In re Whitley, 122 N.C. App. 290, 292, 468 S.E.2d 610, 612, disc. review denied, 344 N.C. 437, 476 S.E.2d 132 (1996) (<HOLDING>); State v. Wilson, 112 N.C. App. 777, 779, 437
holding enhancement applicable where the record supported conclusion that drugs were stored and cut in the same location as the guns even though a search of the location yielded no drugs holding that articulable facts sufficient to support a stop included a telephone call that two black males were selling drugs at a particular location discovery of the juvenile at that location with another black male and the juveniles nervous body reflexes holding that the white defendants association with a black defendant was not sufficient to give them standing to join in the black defendants batson challenge holding that unequivocal examples of racial animus included instances when plaintiff was instructed to keep his black ass off the phone and was called a black son of a bitch and a black motherfucker holding specific articulable facts sufficient to justify a stop included a description of the defendants clothing