and Mayor and Council with respect to the issues involved which will be useful to the 2009 taxpayers and can be used against the Assessor and Mayor and Council in 2009 is so great that the lawyers must be barred from switching sides in these eases. To rule otherwise would do violence to the confidence and loyalty that the City and Assessor had a right to expect when they hired Miller & Gallagher to represent them in the defense of challenges to 2006 and 2007 tax assessments. Accordingly, Miller, Gallagher & Grimley may not represent taxpayers who challenge their tax assessments by Atlantic City for the tax year 2009. An order implementing this opinion accompanies the opinion. N.J.S.A. 2B:13-2d. 2 See G.F. Inds. v. American Brands Inc., 245 N.J.Super. 8, 583 A.2d 765 (App.Div. 1990) (<HOLDING>); see also Home Care Inds. v. Murray, 154
holding that a warranty claim survived alongside a contract claim where a service was promised in addition to the sale of a good holding plaintiff had to commence his breach of implied warranty action under the dtpa within two years because tjhis special statute of limitations denies plaintiffs alternative proposal of entitlement to recover for breach of the common law implied warranty holding that a breach of warranty claim arising out of a corporate acquisition was substantially related to a firms longterm service as the acquired companys general counsel who had advised the acquired company regarding inspection holding that warranty claim accrued at tender where 180 day warranty on computer not a warranty for future performance as it involved a remedy only holding that breach of contract claim related back to misrepresentation claim because operative facts upon which the breach of contract claim was based were contained in the misrepresentation counts of the original complaint