that is not conducted as part of a countywide revised reassessment and which creates, sustains or increases disproportionality among properties’ assessed values.” Assessment boards are prohibited from engaging in spot reassessment. Section 7.1 of the Assessment Law, added by Section 2 of the Act of July 19, 1991, P.L. 91, 72 P.S. § 5348.1; Radecke v. York County Board of Assessment Appeals, 798 A.2d 265 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). The county assessors and the board “cannot reassess less than an entire county except as correction of errors or as otherwise specifically provided by statute.” Vees v. Carbon County Board of Assessment Appeals, 867 A.2d 742, 747 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005) (emphasis added). Compare Shenandoah Mobile Co. v. Dauphin County Board of Assessment Appeals, 869 A.2d 562 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005) (<HOLDING>). The Clean and Green Act requires the county
holding that cause of action for malpractice did not arise until the tax deficiency was assessed because prior to assessment the plaintiff had not been injured holding that an order redistricting a county was merely prospective as to qualifications of county commissioners and did not affect the right to office of those previously elected recognizing county officers as  those whose general authority and jurisdiction are confined within the limits of the county in which they are appointed who are appointed in and for a particular county and whose duties apply only to that county and through whom the county performs its usual political functions  holding that the assessment is given the force of a judgment and if the amount assessed is not paid when due administrative officials may seize the debtors property to satisfy the debt holding that the addition of all cellular towers within the county not previously assessed during countywide reassessment was an initial assessment and not an impermissible spot reassessment