"should not sua sponte excuse a potential juror except on grounds of absolute disqualification”). An unqualified juror is one who is subject to disqualification by a challenge for cause under any of the non-absolute reasons. See id. at 130 n.9. These jurors are “presumptively qualified.” Id. A trial court may not sua sponte excuse a juror on the basis that the juror is unqualified. See id. at 130; see also Goodman v. State, 701 S.W.2d 850, 856 (Tex. Crim. App. 1985) ("It is well settled that a trial judge should not on its own motion excuse a prospective juror for cause unless the juror is absolutely disqualified from serving on a jury.”), A juror is unqualified if he or she does not reside in the county of the district court. See Mayo v. State, 4 S.W.3d 9, 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999) (<HOLDING>); see also Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art.
holding that person who is not party to contract does not have standing to challenge contract holding that there was a raceneutral reason the states use of a peremptory challenge against a venireperson who had a very individualistic hairstyle holding that a challenge for cause based on county residence is waived if not made the legislature did not intend for a defendant to waive the countyresidence requirement only by knowingly accepting a disqualified juror holding that mandamus is appropriate to challenge temporary orders because they are not subject to interlocutory appeal holding that a venireperson who does not live in the county is subject to challenge