document in order to obtain a firearm. On March 11, 1994, Neff pleaded guilty to count one of the indictment which charged that on April 23, 1992, he knowingly and willfully made a false written statement in connection with the acquisition of a firearm from a licensed dealer. Under United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or the “Guidelines”) § 2K2.1(a)(4), the base offense level for a defendant convicted of a firearms violation, who also had prior felony conviction for a “crime of violence,” is 20. The Court determined that Neff’s 1989 attempted burglary conviction, for entering the home of his estranged wife was sufficient to constitute a “crime of violence.” Neff was then granted a three point reducti st Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 979, 110 S.Ct. 508, 107 L.Ed.2d 510 (1989) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Di-Pasquale, 859 F.2d 9, 10,
recognizing a constitutional claim for ineffective assistance of counsel holding no ineffective assistance of appellate counsel claim for failure to raise as basis for appeal of conviction ineffective assistance of trial counsel where basis for the latter claim was inadequate holding that to the extent defendants claim is one of ineffective assistance of counsel it is not cognizable on direct appeal and rule 2915 is the exclusive procedure by which a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can be advanced holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record holding that a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel waives attorneyclient privilege