on the threatening actions of a person posing as a deputy sheriff: [he] came to the plaintiffs house and represented that he was a deputy sheriff, and, after producing papers purporting to be of an official nature, threatened to put the plaintiff out of possession. [He] was not a deputy sheriff, and in fact no action had been instituted to recover possession. The plaintiff yielded possession under the direction of the supposed officer, and under circumstances from which the jury might properly find that the plaintiff had reason to believe that he would be put out by the application of physical force if he did not obey the commands of the supposed officer. Wegner, 12 N.D. at 105, 95 N.W. at 446 (emphasis added); but see Woodring v. Winner Nat’l Bank, 56 S.D. 43, 227 N.W. 438 (1929) (<HOLDING>). [¶ 11] Adhering to the Wegner standard, in
holding utpa does not apply to real property sales holding that  10113aa does not alter the requirement that the property in question be real property in order for the antimodification provision to apply holding the collateral order exception does not apply to a pretrial order denying class certification because the order is subject to revision prior to a decision on the merits holding that in a bankruptcy proceeding state law governs the rights of the parties with regard to interests in property holding that forcible ejectment does not apply when a law enforcement officer acting under a court order threatens to arrest a person accused of hindering a bankruptcy proceeding in order to remove him from the real property atissue in that case