a deed Mr. Clemons executed on February 23, 1993, after his marriage to Ruth, succeeded in conveying a remainder interest in the homestead he occupied with Ruth at the time. We reverse the summary judgment insofar as it declares the purported grant of the remainder interest effective, and remand for further proceedings. The prepr arned trial judge’s construction of the deed as reflecting that “Mr. Clemons ... intended to convey to himself and Mrs. Clemons a life estate in the property, and intended to convey to [Ms. Thornton] the vested remainder upon the death of the survivor of Mr. and Mrs. Clemons.” Mr. Clemons’s grant of a life estate to himself and Mrs. Clemons as tenants by the entireties was a valid conveyance. See Matthews v. McCain, 125 Fla. 840, 170 So. 323, 325 (1936) (<HOLDING>). Like the provision on the books today,
holding husband and wife may hold life estates as tenants by the entireties holding that a reservation clause gave a life estate to a spouse pursuant to a deed reserving use of the property to both husband and wife for life even though the husband had no interest in the property holding that regardless of whether the property was held as tenants in common or by the entirety the husband was entitled to hold property as a homestead holding that when a husband first acquired property and then conveyed it to his wife they could not hold the property as tenants by the entirety or joint tenants because the four unities did not coincide so the deed created a tenancy in common with a right of survivorship holding a wife liable for necessary medical expenses incurred by her husband under the doctrine even though the wife did not sign as a guarantor and did not request that her husband be admitted nor anticipate that her husband would be admitted