verdict is returned, the court will presume that the verdict was returned on a valid count.” 405 So.2d at 138 (opinion on application for rehearing). This Court has also held: "It follows from [the holding in Aspinwall ] that, if the defendant files a motion for directed verdict as to a count which is not supported by the evidence and the court denies such a motion, a general jury verdict will not be presumed to have been returned on a count which is supported by the evidence. ... We cannot presume that the general jury verdict relates to one of the counts which the evidence did support, where it is equally possible that it is based on the count which is unsupported by the evidence.” John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Keller, 431 So.2d 1155, 1157 (Ala.1983); accord d 953 (Ala.2000) (<HOLDING>). As indicated above, the Dykeses did not
holding that the determination of whether the debtor is using real property as his principal residence is made as of the petition date for the purposes of section 1322b2 holding that the legal title holders to real property held it in constructive trust for the equitable title holder who was entitled to the real property based on an earlier contract holding that plaintiffs may have a property interest in real property holding that a tax appeal on real property is a lien on the real estate and not a personal obligation of the landowner holding that a telephone pole although installed in the ground and affixed to real property is a product for purposes of the aemld