for a particular purpose.” Koelsch v. Indus. Gas Supply Corp. 132 S.W.3d 494, 497 (Tex.App.-Houston [1 Dist.] 2004, pet. denied) (citing Marcus Cable Assocs. v. Krohn, 90 S.W.3d 697, 700 (Tex.2002)). A trespasser has neither express nor implied permission to enter the property of another, but enters it nonetheless. Mellon Mortgage Co. v. Holder, 5 S.W.3d 654, 671 (Tex.1999); Koelsch, 132 S.W.3d at 497. An easement holder who exceeds the rights granted by the owner of the servient estate thus commits a trespass. Marcus Cable, 90 S.W.3d at 703 (quoting McDaniel Bros. v. Wilson, 70 S.W.2d 618, 621 (Tex.Civ.App.-Beaumont 1934, writ ref'd) (“[E]very unauthorized entry upon land of another is a trespass even if no damage is done or the injury is slight.”)); see Koelsch, 132 S.W.3d at 499 (<HOLDING>). A party claiming trespass must establish that
holding no prejudice occurred because no new information was presented on the material matter in dispute holding that no trespass occurred because easement permitted construction and relocation of aboveground block valve assembly holding plaintiff with inherently defective heart valve failed to state a claim unless the valve malfunctioned holding that no intentional police misrepresentation occurred recognizing that this courts construction of a statute becomes as much apart of the statute as the words of the statute itself and that change is a matter that addresses itself to the general assembly not this court