it has jurisdiction pursuant to Minn.Stat. §§ 518A.01-518A.25); Minn.Stat. § 518A.03, subd. 1(c)(2) (1992) (granting state courts authority to make custody decisions where the child is physically present in the state and an emergency situation exists because the child is subject to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse); Red Lake Tribal Code § 100.01 (extending sovereignty and jurisdiction to all places within the boundaries of the reservation); Red Lake Tribal Code § 801.13 (granting tribal courts authority to make custody decisions). To hold that the state court has exclusive jurisdiction because Stenseng and K.K.S. have a transient presence off the reservation would sanction unilateral movement of children to gain advantage in custody disputes. Accord 28 U.S.C. § 1738A(c) (1988) (<HOLDING>); Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act,
recognizing a childs contact with a jurisdiction and not mere presence confers jurisdiction holding that the basis of in rem jurisdiction is the presence of the subject property within the territorial jurisdiction of the forum state holding that the mere delivery of documents  does not confer jurisdiction holding that personal jurisdiction was lacking when the only contact by defendant with forum state was initiated by plaintiffs counsels paralegal for the sole purpose of establishing personal jurisdiction holding that the clause at issue granted jurisdiction but not exclusive jurisdiction