undertaken sua sponte, and outside the context of any pending case, thus lending itself to controversy similar to that which attends Freed. 15 . See generally Commonwealth v. Morris, 573 Pa. 157, 187, 822 A.2d 684, 702 (2003) (Saylor, J., concurring) ("It would seem, at least to me, to be more rational to deem the maintenance of the status quo to be procedural and an affirmative award of relief substantive; indeed, given the Morris and Laudenberger holdings in these regards, it is quite difficult for me to predict how the substantive/procedural dichotomy will be applied to various decisions made by the legislative and judicial branches in future contexts as they may arise.” (citations omitted)). 16 . See generally Naylor v. Twp. of Hellam, 565 Pa. 397, 408, 773 A.2d 770, 777 (2001) (<HOLDING>); Program Admin. Servs., Inc. v. Dauphin County
recognizing this as the general rule recognizing the general assemblys superior ability to examine social policy issues and to establish appropriate substantive legal standards recognizing the general assemblys superior ability to examine social policy issues and determine legal standards so as to balance competing concerns recognizing standards to determine discrimination are the same under the ra and the ada recognizing general rule