of the child is appropriate. If deemed appropriate, the local law enforcement agency, or the child welfare department, shall cause the child to un dergo a physical examination performed by a medical practitioner who has specialized training in detecting and treating child abuse injuries and neglect, and, whenever possible, shall ensure that this examination take place within 72 hours of the time the child was taken into protective custody. Whether § 324.5 authorizes the County’s medical examinations has not been squarely addressed by previous courts. In Wallis, the Ninth Circuit suggested that “there is no apparent conflict between the requirements of this opinion and the statute in question.” 202 F.3d at 1141 fn. 12 (citing Tenenbaum v. Williams, 907 F.Supp. 606 (E.D.N.Y.1995) (<HOLDING>), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 193 F.3d
recognizing that the essential requisites of procedural due process are notice and meaningful opportunity to be heard holding that procedural due process requires adequate notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard holding that a predeprivation opportunity to be heard satisfies the due process clause holding basic elements of due process are notice and a right to be heard holding that a new york statute authorizing local officials to give consent for medical services for a child in protective custody did not affect the courts conclusion that nonetheless due process required those officials to obtain judicial authorization for a purely investigatory examination issued after notice and an opportunity to be heard had been furnished to the parents 202 f3d at 1141 fn 12