460 U.S. 491, 506, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 1329, 75 L.Ed.2d 229, 242 (1983) (plurality opinion)). “[C]ommon sense and ordinary human experience must govern over rigid criteria.” Id. at 477, 706 A.2d 180. In addition, police conduct during a traffic stop must be evaluated “within the context of unfolding events.” Diloreto, supra, 180 N.J. at 277, 850 A.2d 1226. Many jurisdictions have found that running an NCIC cheek, in addition to a driver’s license check, is within the scope of a traffic stop and is permissible so long as it does not unreasonably extend the time of the stop. See McRae, supra, 81 F.3d at 1535-36 n. 6 (explaining that during traffic stop, officer may access NCIC records to determine quickly existence of outstanding warrants); State v. Lopez, 873 P.2d 1127, 1133 (Utah 1994) (<HOLDING>); see also People v. McGaughran, 25 Cal.3d 577,
holding that prolonged detention beyond time necessary to write citation was unreasonable absent reasonable suspicion of criminal activity holding warrant check lawful if detention not extended beyond time necessary to request license and registration and issue citation holding detention of passenger for warrant check violated fourth amendment absent reasonable suspicion holding warrant check not unreasonable where detention not extended solely for that purpose holding encounter became improper detention when officer took passengers license back to police car to run warrant check