For the reasons stated in the Court’s Order of even date, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed with prejudice. 1 . Plaintiff has also stated that between 1996 and 1999 he filed 14 lawsuits in Alaska relating to his imprisonment. Although Plaintiff has provided specific case numbers, he did not provide any information regarding the disposition of the cases. This Court was able to locate only one of the cases on the U.S. Party Case Index, Civil Action No. 98-CV-0119, but there was not sufficient information to determine whether the dismissal of the case or the appeal (USCA No. 98-35873) would count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Patton v. Jefferson Correctional Center, 136 F.3d 458, 464 (5th Cir.1998)
holding that the aedpas tolling provision is inapplicable under peterson v demskie where petitioners conviction became final prior to the effective date of the aedpa holding that the plras three strikes provision applied to an appeal pending prior to the effective date of the plra and authorized denial of in forma pauperis status based on lawsuits and appeals dismissed as frivolous prior to the effective date of the plra holding that for purposes of counting strikes under  1915g it is irrelevant whether the strikes occurred prior to or after the effective date of the aedpa holding that  1915g does not operate retroactively simply because dismissals entered before the enactment of the plra are considered in applying  1915g holding aedpa applicable to petition filed on or after aedpas effective date