reiterate that "[a]llowing only interlocutory appeals of orders denying arbitration ... allow[s] arbitration to proceed [ ] without unnecessary delay.” (Citing Gepaya v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 94 Ha-wai'i 362, 365, 14 P.3d 1043, 1046 (2000).) 24 . The ICA reached the same conclusion in Pi-cardy, holding that “HRS § 641-1 provides additional authority for appeals, authorizing appeals to the [ICA] from final judgments, orders, or decrees." 2009 WL 4988294 at *1. 25 . The UAA appeals section is virtually identical to the RUAA appeals section. The UAA section governing appeals provides as follows: § 19 Appeals. (a) An appeal may be taken from: (1) An order denying a motion to compel arbitration made under Section 2; (2) An order granting a [motion] to st S.W.2d 713 (Ky.App.1988) (<HOLDING>); Maleski v. Mutual Fire, Marine, and Inland
holding that an order compelling arbitration in an independent proceeding is appealable as a final order because in that context the order compelling arbitration resolves the sole issue before the court holding that it is not holding that an order compelling arbitration is not appealable because it is not listed in the uaa statute and because it is not final holding that orders compelling arbitration are not appealable not because of the uaa appeals provision but because it has been definitely settled by the supreme court of this state that an order compelling arbitration is not final and therefore is not appealable holding that an order granting a motion or application to compel arbitration is nonappealable because it is not listed in the uaa arbitration provision and because it is not a final order