from a collateral source should be deducted from an award to a plaintiff in an employment discrimination action based on both federal and state law. However, the Second Circuit has noted, in the context of an employment discrimination case, that “while collateral source payments do represent an additional benefit to the plaintiff, we note a sister circuit’s view that ‘[a]s between the employer, whose action caused the discharge, and the employee, who may have experienced other noncompensable losses, it is fitting that the burden be placed on the employer.’ ” Promisel v. First American Artificial Flowers, Inc., 943 F.2d 251, 258 (2d Cir.1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060, 112 S.Ct. 939, 117 L.Ed.2d 110 (1992) (quoting Maxfield v. Sinclair International, 766 F.2d 788, 795 (3d Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1057, 106 S.Ct. 796,
holding that an evidentiary hearing is not required prior to the termination of social security disability benefits holding a social security number is not private holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation holding that social security benefits should not be set off from adea lost wages award holding that offset for social security retirement benefits does not include federal disability benefits and stating that there was no legislative intent to embody the entire subchapter of the social security act dealing with both disability benefits and old age benefits