original rate of .043775 for 2013. 4 . On or about January 20, 2016, HMC and the Office entered into a payment plan. R.R. at 62a. 5 .Our review is limited to determining whether constitutional rights were violated, whether the adjudication is in accordance with the law or whether necessary findings of fact are supported by substantial evidence. Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S. § 704; Resource Staffing, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 995 A.2d 887, 890 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010). As to questions of law, our scope of review is plenary and our standard of review is de novo. Slippe 68 A.2d 190, 203 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995), aff'd, 544 Pa. 512, 677 A.2d 1206 (1996) (same); Department of Health v. Crown Nursing Home, 26 Pa.Cmwlth. 7, 362 A.2d 491, 493 (1976) (<HOLDING>); see also Smiley v. Heyburn, 389 Pa. 594, 133
holding in considering a writ of prohibition that the court of common pleas lacked authority to dictate to the county public defenders office criteria for representation of applicants seeking its services recognizing the court of common pleas of dauphin county as the predecessor to the commonwealth court recognizing that the question of whether the interest of justice is served by the transfer of a juvenile for adult prosecution is a decision within the broad discretion of the district court recognizing the transfer of jurisdiction to the commonwealth court of those classes of cases previously heard by the court of common pleas of dauphin county as the court wherein the seat of state government is located holding that district courts of appeal have jurisdiction to review by common law certiorari decision of circuit court upholding county court conviction obtained in violation of constitution