States v. Carter, 564 F.3d 325, 328 (4th Cir.2009). We presume that a sentence within the Guidelines range is reasonable. See United States v. Allen, 491 F.3d 178, 193 (4th Cir.2007). McLaurin’s presentence investigation report (“PSR”) properly calculated his total offense level at thirty-one and appropriately placed him in criminal history category VI, yielding a Guidelines range of 262 to 327 months. The district court adopted the PSR’s factual findings and calculations at sentencing, afforded counsel an opportunity to argue regarding an appropriate sentence, afforded McLaurin an opportunity to allocute, considered the § 3553(a) factors before imposing McLaurin’s sentence, and thoroughly explained its rationale for imposing McLaurin’s particular sentence. See Carter, 564 F.3d at 330 (<HOLDING>) (internal quotation marks and citations
holding that district court must conduct individualized assessment based on particular facts of each case recognizing that the district court must place on the record an individualized assessment based on the particular facts of the case before it and that the individualized assessment  must provide a rationale tailored to the particular case at hand and be adequate to permit meaningful appellate review holding that while the gsr is a valuable starting point the sentencing judge must make an individualized assessment based on the facts presented holding that suspicion must be individualized holding that the decision of the appellate court establishes the law of the case and it must be followed by the trial court on remand