by splitting the primary residential custody of the two minor children between the parents, by failing to make a child support determination, by failing to award her alimony or explain why she was not entitled to any, and by failing to award her attorney’s fees and costs. We affirm 001) (same). This is especially necessary in the current case to overcome the presumption in favor of alimony that arose from the long term of the marriage. Because the final judgment contains no mention of the alimony issue, we remand for further proceedings. Staton v. Staton, 710 So.2d 744, 745-46 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). The final judgment also did not address Mrs. Schomburg’s claim for attorney’s fees. We therefore remand with instructions that the trial court resolve this issue. Perrin, 795 So.2d at 1024 (<HOLDING>). The final judgment reserved jurisdiction to
recognizing that an award of temporary attorneys fees and costs is based on an assessment of need and ability to pay as well as the reasonableness of the fees and costs holding that a trial court cannot decide the issue of attorneys fees without findings as to one spouses ability to pay and the others need holding that it is plain error for a trial court to require a defendant to pay courtappointed attorney fees in the absence of legally sufficient evidence that defendant has the ability to pay the amount imposed holding that a trial court commits plain error by imposing courtappointed attorney fees where the record is silent as to the defendants ability to pay the fees ordered holding that the trial court abused its discretion in establishing an arrearages repayment plan without making any factual findings concerning the paying spouses ability to pay