the legality of this general warrant before them . . . the 29th chapter of Magna Charta . . . which is pointed against arbitrary power, was violated’ ”). 25 The statute in question provided in relevant part: “an act fob believing AND OEDEEING OF IDIOTS, IMPOTENT, DISTEACTED, AND IDLE PEE-SONS. . . . [Par.] 8. . . . [T]he Select-men for the Time being, in the several Towns in this State, shall from Time to Time, diligently inspect into the Affairs and Management of all Persons in their Town, whether Housholders or others; and if they shall find any Person or Persons that are reduced, or are likely to be reduced to Want by Idleness, Mismanagement, or bad Husbandry, that then such Select-men may appoint an Overseer to advise, direct, and order such Person in the Manage 93 A.2d 292 (1952) (<HOLDING>); see generally Bivens v. Six Unknown Named
holding that intentional infliction of emotional distress is a personal injury tort recognizing validity of cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress holding that act did not bar intentional infliction of emotional distress claim holding that under south dakota law compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress requires manifestation of physical symptoms and intentional infliction of emotional distress requires an extreme disabling emotional response recognizing torts of intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress