[ (LLDPE) ], very low density polyethylene [ (VLDPE) ], ultra low density polyethylene [ (ULDPE) ], metallocene-catalyzed linear low density polyethylene resin [ (mLLDPE) ], or blends thereof.” Multilayer v. Inteplast, 2013 WL 5972195, at *26 (emphasis added). That is, Multilayer argued the very claim construction that we now adopt. Multilayer cannot now allege that the layers of element (b) of claims 1 and 28 do not have to be “made from” the listed resins. See Key Pharm. v. Hercon Labs. Corp., 161 F.3d 709, 715 (Fed. Cir. 1998); Transclean Corp. v. Jiffy Lube Int’l, Inc., 474 F.3d 1298, 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2007). The consequence of our construction of element (b) is that claim 10 is invalid. Claim 10 recites, in relevant part, “[t]he multi-layer, thermoplastic 336, 1349 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (<HOLDING>). “[Wjhere ... claims are susceptible to only
holding that in order to understand patent claims a court can take instruction from the other claims the specification and the prosecution history holding claims to a broad genus of genetic material invalid because the specification disclosed only one particular species holding that claims that contradicted the specification were invalid as indefinite holding that limitations from the specification should not be read into the claims holding that claims that were internally contradictory were invalid as indefinite