White arrived on the scene to when he arrived with the appellant at the Travis County Jail.” However; in light of M'cNeely, we conclude that this case is distinguishable from Schmerber. Here, although Roop was involved in á traffic accident, nothing in‘the record suggests that this fact significantly ■ delayed the collection of Roop’s blood. Officer White testified that he came into contact with Roop at about- 4:00 a.m., placed Roop under arrest at 4:25, and ordered her blood to be drawn at 5:09. The stop for Roop to use the restroom took just a few minutes, and the drive to the jail took only seven to eight minutes. We are not persuaded that'the mere existence of-a traffic accident constitutes a per se exigency justifying a warrantless blood draw. - See Evans, 2015 WL 545702, at *6 (<HOLDING>). In addition, “[ajlthough the findings of fact
holding that officers cannot base a warrantless search on an exigent circumstance of their own creation holding that the threat of imminent destruction of evidence of criminal activity created an exigent circumstance recognizing exigent circumstance exception to warrant requirement holding that accident investigation by itself is not exigent circumstance holding that blood alcohol dissipation was not sufficient by itself to create an exigent circumstances exception to virginia statutory requirement that the driver be arrested within three hours of the offense