there is a change in the Customer’s operation or construction which, in the judgment of the Company, makes the relocation of Company’s facilities necessary, or if such relocation is requested by the Customer, the Company will move such facilities at the Customer’s expense to a location which is acceptable to the Company. “It is well established that a limitation of liability contained in a tariff is an essential part of the rate, and that the consumer is bound by the tariff regardless of his knowledge or assent thereto. Tariffs are even recognized as having the force and effect of law.” Landrum v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 505 So.2d 552, 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (internal citations omitted); see also Fla. Power Corp. v. Cont’l Testing Labs., Inc., 243 So.2d 195, 197 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971) (<HOLDING>). The trial court had initially set the bond on
holding that an agencys interpretation of its own regulations is controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation citation and quotation marks excluded holding that a secretarys interpretation of a departments regulation is controlling unless plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation holding that a power companys tariff regulation having been approved by the public service commission when enforced without discrimination is binding upon the consumer unless it is plainly unreasonable or outrageous in its general operation recognizing that when an agency promulgates a regulation that is intended to preempt state law the regulation should not be disturbed unless there is evidence that it is contrary to congressional intent holding commission created and given full power to investigate hear and determine disputes between utility and general public primarily for the interest of the consumer