is no basis for appellate review.”); Hundley v. Rite Aid of S.C, Inc., 339 S.C. 285, 306, 529 S.E.2d 45, 56 (Ct.App.2000) (finding arguments must be conducted on the record to be preserved for appellate review). Further, the appellant has the burden of providing an adequate record on appeal. Harkins v. Greenville Cnty., 340 S.C. 606, 616, 533 S.E.2d 886, 891 (2000); see also Rule 210(h), SCACR (“Except as provided by Rule 212 and Rule 208(b)(1)(C) and (2), the appellate court will not consider any fact which does not appear in the Record on Appeal.”). When an appellant acquiesces to the trial court’s ruling, that issue cannot be raised on appeal. State v. Mitchell, 330 S.C. 189, 195, 498 S.E.2d 642, 645 (1998); see also State v. Bryant, 372 S.C. 305, 315-16, 642 S.E.2d 582, 588 (2007) (<HOLDING>); Ex parte McMillan, 319 S.C. 331, 335, 461
holding that because appellant did not object to trial courts ruling excluding summary judgment proof the issue is waived recognizing that ruling of one trial judge does not preclude another trial judge reconsidering interlocutory ruling holding if an appellant conceded trial courts ruling was not prejudicial he could not assert on appeal the ruling denied him a fair trial holding that appellate court reviewing trial courts habeas corpus ruling must review record evidence in light most favorable to ruling and uphold ruling absent abuse of discretion holding that on appeal a summary judgment ruling will be upheld if it can be sustained on any grounds even if the trial court gave an incorrect reason for its ruling