computer entry to determine that the plaintiff voluntarily quit instead of the administrative and judicial determinations of the State of Michigan that the plaintiff left work due to a work-related injury. GM’s argument that the plaintiff walked away from his job was rejected by the workers’ compensation appeal board. Common law doctrines of collateral estoppel and res judicata apply to final determinations by administrative agencies acting in judicial capacity, see Astoria Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Solimino, 501 U.S. 104, 107-08, 111 S.Ct. 2166, 115 L.Ed.2d 96 (1991). The failure of the Pension Board to recognize the force of those decisions would be irrational in light of the plan’s provisions even if they were not binding. See Glenn v. MetLife, 461 F.3d 660, 669 (6th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); Bennett v. Kemper Nat’l Servs., Inc., 514
holding that evidence contrary to an administrators decision does not make the decision arbitrary and capricious so long as a reasonable basis appears for the decision holding that a failure of an erisa plan administrator to address the social security administrations determination that claimant is totally disabled is yet another factor that can render the denial of further longterm disability benefits arbitrary and capricious holding that the plan administrators failure to address the social security administrations finding of the claimants disability rendered the decision arbitrary and capricious holding that when applying an arbitrary and capricious standard of review the courts role is to determine whether the plan administrators decision was completely unreasonable holding that a reversal of the plan administrators decision is in order under the most deferential arbitrary and capricious standard when no reasonable grounds exist to support the decision