(1965)). "Section 413 is premised on direct liability for a principal employer's negligence in failing to insure that special precautions are taken in the contractor's work." Thompson, 1999 UT 22, ¶ 28, 979 P.2d 322. 131 Albertsons correctly notes that no Utah court has expressly adopted the peeu-liar risk doctrine. At least three times Utah courts have been presented with the peculiar risk doctrine or its variant, the "inherently dangerous work" doctrine, see Restatement (Second) of Torts §§ 416, 427, 427A (1965). Each time the appeal was resolved on other grounds. See Poteet v. White, 2006 UT 63, ¶ 8, 147 P.3d 439 (declining to consider adopting the inherently dangerous work doe-trine "because it is unnecessary to our resolution of the case"); Thompson, 1999 UT 22, ¶ 33, 979 P.2d 322 (<HOLDING>); Johnson v. Department of Transp., 2004 UT App
holding that provisions of section 40115102 are applicable to the determination of the status of truck drivers as employees or independent contractors under the workers compensation act and discussing legislative history indicating intent to apply these provisions both to workers compensation and unemployment compensation matters holding that under the doctrine the district court should have stayed the diversityjurisdiction case pending the state workers compensation commissions final decision on whether the defendant properly paid certain workers compensation claims holding  616d030 barred employees actions where employees sued the state industrial insurance system alleging bad faith administration of their workers compensation claims holding that the peculiar risk doctrine has no application to employees of independent contractors whose claims fall within the workers compensation system holding that the adas bar on claims by independent contractors applied to rehabilitation act claims