Roberts v. Carter, 350 So.2d 78 (Fla. 1977); Sunbeam Enterprises, Inc. v. Upthegrove, 316 So.2d 34 (Fla. 1975). In Roberts v. Carter, supra, the Florida Supreme Court held that under Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (1975), a part of Florida’s Insurance Code, only persons named in the statute as authorized to recover attorneys’ fees could, in fact, do so. Section 627.428(1) provides: “Upon .. . judgment ... against an insurer and in favor of an insured or the named beneficiary under a policy ... the . .. court . .. shall [award] . . . attorneys’ fees.” (emphasis supplied).' The court held that only “the contracting insured, the insured’s estate, specifically named beneficiaries and third parties who have coverage through assignment” may recover attorneys’ fees. See al 76) (<HOLDING>). See also Ellis v. Flink, 374 So.2d 4 (Fla.
holding that a law clerks time is recoverable as part of attorneys fees under  1988 holding that attorneys fees and court costs are recoverable under general hold harmless indemnity agreement holding in a slander of title action that attorneys fees are recoverable as part of the costs of removing the cloud from the title holding that lexis fees are not taxable as costs but reserving ruling on whether such fees are recoverable as attorneys fees holding attorneys fees not generally recoverable unless party prevails under cause of action for which attorneys fees are recoverable and damages are recovered