determine the issue and after entry of the court’s order directing production of the documents). 40 . McCoo v. Denny’s, Inc., 192 F.R.D. 675, 680 (D.Kan.2000) (citing Boyer v. Bd. of County Comm’rs, 162 F.R.D. 687, 688 (D.Kan.1995)). 41 . Ali v. Douglas Cable Commc'ns, Ltd. P’ship, 890 F.Supp. 993, 994 (D.Kan.1995). 42 . McCoo, 192 F.R.D. at 680 (citing Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Midland Bancor, Inc., 159 F.R.D. 562, 567 (D.Kan.1994)). 43 . Id. (citing Jones v. Boeing Co., 163 F.R.D. 15, 17 (D.Kan.1995)). 44 . Id. (citing Kelling v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc., 157 F.R.D. 496, 497 (D.Kan.1994)). 45 . Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. West, 748 F.2d 540, 542 (10th Cir.1984). 46 . See Williams v. Sprint/United Mgmt. Co., No. 03-2200-JWL-DJW, 2006 WL 266599, at *3 (D.Kan. Feb. 1, 2006) (<HOLDING>). 47 . Id. 48 . In re Grand Jury Subpoena To
holding that an invocation of the advice of counsel defense waives the attorneyclient privilege holding communications between corporate counsel and corporations employees made for the purpose of rendering legal advice protected by attorneyclient privilege holding that attorneyclient privilege could apply to communications of legal advice between nonlawyer members of management and human resources department if the communication was made in confidence for the primary purpose of obtaining legal advice holding that discussions between management personnel concerning legal advice given by attorney is privileged even when attorney is not physically present holding that if documents are privileged in the hands of the client they retain that privilege when given to an attorney for the purpose of seeking legal advice