and has the discretion to deviate from the child support guidelines under the appropriate circumstances. See Graby v. Graby, 87 N.Y.2d 605, 611, 641 N.Y.S.2d 577, 580, 664 N.E.2d 488, 491 (1996) (“Social Security benefits paid to petitioner’s dependents on the basis of his disability are ‘financial resources’ of the children that should be considered by the court after the basic support obligation is calculated and only then pursuant to a[n] ... ‘unjust or inappropriate’ determination.”); Stultz v. Stultz, 659 N.E.2d 125 (Ind.1995) (noting trial court has discretion to determine whether to credit social security disability dependency payments received by the child toward a noncustodial parent’s child support obligation); In re Marriage of Lawhorn, 119 Or.App. 225, 850 P.2d 1126 (1993) (<HOLDING>). See also Griffin v. Avery, 120 N.H. 783, 424
recognizing impact of child support guidelines holding that it was error for the trial court to determine the issue of child support without a child support guidelines worksheet holding that use of social security benefits satisfied child support obligation holding noncustodial parent not entitled to an automatic credit and court could order child support in addition to social security disability dependency benefits holding trial court may consider social security disability dependency benefits received by the child and may deviate from the application of the child support guidelines if application of the guidelines is unjust or inappropriate