several instruments, executed contemporaneously or at different times, pertain to the same transaction, they will be read together although they do not expressly refer to each other.” See Fort Worth Indep. Sch. Dist. v. City of Fort Worth, 22 S.W.3d 831, 840 (Tex.2000). Here, the Purchase Agreement and the RIC reflect separate aspects of the same transaction; therefore, the arbitration clause is applicable to Leroy’s complaints about the RIC on this ground as well as on the on the ground of the broad scope of the arbitration clause. See Neal v. Hardee's Food Sys., Inc., 918 F.2d 34, 37 (5th Cir.1990); Personal Sec. & Safety Sys., Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 297 F.3d 388, 394-95 (5th Cir.2002); see also Quality Truck and Auto Sales, Inc. v. Yassine, 730 So.2d 1164, 1169-70 (Ala.1999) (<HOLDING>), 3 . By way of a footnote in her response to
holding that purchaser could rescind contract where seller failed to disclose a fact  the flooding of the subject real estate  that seller knew purchaser would regard as material holding that creditor held a purchase money security interest in household furniture by virtue of assignment of the retail installment contract from the seller holding that a person who obtains drugs from a seller is not an accomplice of the seller holding that purchaser of vehicle was required to arbitrate her claims even though seller did not sign bill of sale containing arbitration clause when seller accepted and acted upon bill of sale by contemporaneously executing retail installment contract holding unenforceable certain financing arrangements under a contract for the sale of property upon which the seller is liable for taxes if the sale was consummated with intent to avoid such tax or in fraud of the internal revenue laws