v. Walkley, 143 A.D.2d 415, 416, 532 N.Y.S.2d 426, 427 (N.Y.App.Div.1988) 11 . 280 A.D.2d 892, 721 N.Y.S.2d 184 (N.Y.App.Div.2001) 12 . Id. 13 . Oaktree's Ex. A, § 7.1(e) and (£). 14 . Oaktree Ex. # A, § 7.1 atpg. 63. 15 . Id. 16 . 268 F.3d 743, 749 (9th Cir.2001) (citing What is Essential to Exercise of Option to Accelerate Maturity of Bill or Note, 5 A.L.R.2d 968, 971, 1949 WL 6858 (1949) [for the premise that the addition of words such as "without demand or notice” does not alter the requirement of an affirmative act of the holder of the note for the valid exercise of the option]). 17 . 452 F.Supp. 542, 547 (D.Vt.1978). 18 . 9 B.R. 99 (Bankr.D.Hawai‘i.1981). 19 Hotel Owner Limited Partnership (In re Schaumburg Hotel Owner Limited Partnership), 97 B.R. 943, 951 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1989) (<HOLDING>); In re Skyler Ridge, 80 B.R. 500, 509-511
holding that nonresident rates are matter of contract that will not be reviewed for reasonableness holding that a court should allow the contractuallybargained for default rate under section 506b without examining the reasonableness of these rates provided they fall within the range of acceptable rates holding that the district court should have looked to prevailing rates in the area holding that under the filed rate doctrine a question regarding reasonable rates should be addressed to the department of insurance and that the rate plaintiff was charged is conclusively presumed reasonable under the filed rate doctrine holding that absent other evidence of prevailing market rates the district judge may establish a reasonable rate based on his familiarity with the prevailing rates in the area