was decided, Ohio had state-issued temporary tags, but had no law that governed how the tags had to be displayed. The officer who stopped Chatton justified his stop based on two grounds: the tag was not visibly displayed, and cars with temporary tags are often used in criminal activity. 15 . Id. at 1239-40. 16 . 242 Neb. 426, 495 N.W.2d 475 (1993). At the time Childs was decided, Nebraska issued "In Transit” stickers to newly acquired cars. The expiration date was not visible, however, without pulling the car over to examine the sticker. 17 . See State v. LaBarge, 275 S.C. 168, 268 S.E.2d 278 (1980) (noting that all presumptions of law are in favor of innocence until proven otherwise). 18 . S.C.Code Ann. § 56-3-2420 (1991). 19 . See United States v. Wilson, 205 F.3d 720 (4th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>). 20 . See State v. Copeland, 321 S.C. 318,
holding detention of passenger for warrant check violated fourth amendment absent reasonable suspicion holding that officers may consistent with the fourth amendment conduct a brief investigatory stop when they have a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot holding that an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct traffic stop even when his suspicion that a law has been violated is based on a reasonable mistake of law holding that absent probable cause to arrest a police officer may approach an individual to conduct a brief investigatory stop when the officer has a reasonable articulable suspicion that criminal conduct is afoot holding that absent an articulable reasonable suspicion of unlawful conduct the fourth amendment forbids stopping a car simply because it has a temporary tag