was not filed within the requisite period. See INA § 245(i) (allowing aliens who entered without inspection to adjust if the visa petition was filed on or before April 20, 2001). Mamo does not challenge this determination in these proceedings. 3 . The Government agrees that Mamo’s release constituted a conditional parole pursuant to INA § 236. Motion for Summary Disposition, 6 n. 4. We are not convinced, however, that Mamo was conditionally paroled, see § 236(a)(2)(B), as opposed to simply being released on a “bond ... containing conditions prescribed by ... the Attorney General,” see § 236(a)(2)(A). Indeed, none of the documents associated with Mamo’s December 2004 release suggest that he was conditionally paroled. Cf. Ortega-Cervantes v. Gonzales, 501 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2007) (<HOLDING>). Even assuming, however, that Mamo was
holding that alien was conditional paroled where inter alia he was issued a form entitled order of release on recognizance which  declared that in accordance with section 236 of the ina  you are being released on your own recognizance provided you comply with certain conditions  holding that if you do not qualify under the hup test you never get to the statute holding that the district courts question do you also understand that under some circumstances you or the government may have the right to appeal any sentence that i impose did not comply with rule llbln and failed to properly notify the defendant about the waiver of his appellate rights holding that conditional guilty pleas are valid when entered into in accordance with certain standards holding the unsolicited giving of the following definition to be harmless error proof of such a convincing character that you would be willing to rely upon it without hesitation in your most important affairs of your own sic