CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Purdy v. Gulf Breeze Enters., 403 So.2d 1325, 1331 (Fla.1981) (<HOLDING>). THOMPSON, SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ.,
holding that defendants have a right to be present at voir dire holding that the jurors failure to remember particular facts inquired about on voir dire and the jurors misunderstanding of voir dire questions do not constitute probable prejudice holding that absence of defendants from part of voir dire discussing trial publicity with prospective jurors was error under rule 43 holding trial judges statement during voir dire that appellant likely would be automatically deported if released on probation along with references to deportation by defense counsel and prospective jurors supported inference that appellant knew consequences of plea holding that the extent to which parties may examine prospective jurors on voir dire lies within the trial judges discretion