Alfonso v. District of Columbia, 464 F.Supp.2d 1, 5-6 (D.D.C.2006) (declining to “conduct a minute evaluation” of the plaintiffs’ fee petition to determine reasonableness of every individual charge). Accordingly, rather than deny reimbursement for all charges that the defendants claim are clerical, the court has factored any purely clerical activities into its overall reduction of the total fee award. c. Charges for Activities Too Remote in Time From the Administrative Proceeding The defendants ask the court to disallow certain charges which, they argue, are too remote in time from the administrative hearing. Defs.’ Opp’n at 16-17. The plaintiff submitted for reimbursement for activities between August 18, 2008 and October 29, 2008. PL’s Reply at 10. The t *4 (D.D.C. July 11, 2006) (<HOLDING>). The disputed charges were incurred less than
holding that  1744a requires filings be submitted each calendar year holding that policy coverage is triggered in each year that the plaintiff inhaled asbestos recognizing that questions of changed conditions and the amount of child support must be resolved on the particular facts of each case holding that time spent over the course of a year for a particular client is reasonable because the plaintiffs tied each charge to a subsequent hearing and it often takes up to a year for an administrative idea case to be resolved recognizing that an alj is in a much better position than the appellate court to determine the reasonableness of time spent by a lawyer on a particular task in the course of litigation