the reckless or negligent exertion of force [in this prong would make] the 'otherwise' clause ... redundant.” Id. at 373-374 (footnote omitted). In other words, according to the court, the structure of the statute supports the conclusion: "The first prong discusses intentional acts, while the second prong discusses acts with a mental state of less than intent.” Id. at 373. 9 . As noted above, the phrase "crime of violence” is used frequently with varying definitions. See note 6 supra. The § 4B 1.2(a) definition is, however, worded the same as the ACCA definition of "violent felony” and therefore provides a useful comparison. Compare 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1)(B) with Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 4B1.2(a)(2002); see also United States v. Arnold, 58 F.3d 1117, 1121 (6th Cir.1995)(<HOLDING>); United States v. Johnson, 246 F.3d 330, 334
holding that the categorical approach applies to the identical definition of crime of violence in 18 usc  16 holding that the definition of a violent felony  is nearly identical to the definitions of a crime of violence used in the guidelines holding that our reasoning regarding the meaning of violent felony is relevant to determining the meaning of crime of violence  because the definitions are almost identical holding that for purposes of 18 usc  924e involuntary manslaughter in ohio is a violent felony the definition of which is identical for all relevant purposes to the definition of crime of violence in  4b12a holding that courts should look to the statutory definition of the crime charged rather than the actual facts of the individuals prior conviction to determine whether the crime qualifies as a violent felony under the acca