rule that counsel must always consult with the defendant regarding an appeal. 528 U.S. at 479-80, 120 S.Ct. 1029 (internal quotations and citations omitted). 10 . Interestingly, South Carolina does not contend that we are barred from considering Frazer’s claim in light of Flores-Ortega. Indeed, South Carolina asserts that Carey is consistent with Flores-Ortega. For the reasons stated, we disagree. Carey presumes that counsel need not inform or consult with his defendant regarding the right to appeal. Flores-Ortega, however, states the opposite: that "in the vast majority of cases, counsel [will] ha[ve] a duty to consult with a defendant about an appeal." 528 U.S. at 481, 120 S.Ct. 1029. 11 . See also Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973) (<HOLDING>). 12 . The fact that there was little
holding entry of guilty plea waives challenges to the deprivation of constitutional rights that occurred prior to the entry of the guilty plea  emphasis added recognizing that a voluntary and understanding guilty plea entered without the benefit of a plea bargain waives all nonjurisdictional defects that occurred before the entry of the plea holding entry of a guilty plea waives all nonjurisdictional issues holding that the defendant remains the master of his case particularly with respect to the entry of a guilty plea holding that a valid guilty plea waives a statute of limitations defense