or child; or (ii) by its terms explicitly prohibits the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against such intimate partner or child that would reasonably be expected to cause bodily injury; to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce, or possess in or affecting commerce, any firearm or ammunition; or to receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce. 18 U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(8) (2000 & Supp.2007). 4 . See Tom Lininger, A Better Way to Disarm Batterers, 54 Hastings L.J. 525, 535-48 (2003) (discussing legislative history and constitutional challenges to ban of guns while restraining order is in effect pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8)); United States v. Miles, 238 F.Supp.2d 297, 300-05 (D.Me.2002) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Calor, 172 F.Supp.2d 900,
holding on summary judgment that a regulation is narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest holding sentencing enhancement scheme in armed career criminal amendment to 18 usca  1202a constitutional holding 18 usca  922g8 passes constitutional muster because it is a reasonable restriction on the right to bear arms and is narrowly tailored to support a compelling government interest holding that such classifications are permissible only when suitably tailored to serve a compelling state interest holding that the government interest in preventing crime is compelling