532, 539-40 (5th Cir.1998). 3 . See, e.g., Jones v. Flagship Int’l, 793 F.2d 714, 719-21 (5th Cir.1986). 4 . See also Wathen v. General Elect. Co., 115 F.3d 400, 404 (6th Cir.1997) (noting that a majority of the circuits considering suits against the agent of an employer "have held that an employee/supervisor, who does not otherwise qualify as an 'employer,' cannot be held individually liable under Title VII and similar statutory schemes’’); Grant v. Lone Star Co., 21 F.3d 649, 651 (5th Cir.1994). ("We have refused to impose liability for backpay on individual public employees. [The plaintiff] offers no persuasive argument why Congress would not have intended to protect private employees, as well, from individual title VII liability.”); Harvey v. Blake, 913 F.2d 226, 227 (5th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>). 5 . Aside from the instant case and Allen,
holding that the qualified immunity of a public official does not necessarily protect a government employer sued on a theory of respondeat superior  holding that the doctrine of qualified immunity does not protect a government official who is sued in an official capacity under title vii because title vii does not impose personal liability holding that there is no individual liability under title vii holding that title vii does not include a continuing violation doctrine holding title ix does not support an action against official in an individual capacity