at 456); see Afognak Logging, 31 P.3d at 786 ("Discretionary function immunity precludes liability for harm caused by the type of planning decisions that involve policy formulation. In contrast, operational decisions-those made while executing or implementing existing policies-are not immune." (internal citations omitted)). 14 . Angnabooguk v. State, 26 P.3d 447, 456 (Alaska 2001) (emphasis added). 15 . Sanders, 944 P.2d at 456 (quoting Johnson v. State, 636 P.2d 47, 64 (Alaska 1981)). 16 . 26 P.3d at 454-59. 17 . Id. at 456. 18 . - Id. at 458 (quoting Harry Stoller & Co., Inc. v. City of Lowell, 412 Mass. 139, 587 N.E.2d 780, 785 (1992)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 19 . - Id. at 458-59 (citations omitted); see Adams v. City of Tenakee Springs, 963 P.2d 1047, 1051 (Alaska 1998) (<HOLDING>). 20 . Angnabooguk, 26 P.3d at 459 (citation
holding that the citys decision was arbitrary and capricious when it was contrary to the evidence and based solely on speculation arising from prior unrelated acts holding that a board affirmance of an ro decision subsumes that decision recognizing that the existence of a copy of a decision in a bill file along with numerous references to a decision of the court of appeals in the legislative history indicated that an amendment was made in response to that decision holding that citys decision whether to allocate funds to hire firefighters was an immune planning decision holding that evidence contrary to an administrators decision does not make the decision arbitrary and capricious so long as a reasonable basis appears for the decision