copies made. Moreover, evidence at the hearing revealed that Zell seeks recovery of 20 cents per copy, not the actual cost, and it was stipulated that commercial copying rates would have been 3]é cents per page. Accordingly, because no exact count was kept, because Zell seeks to overcharge the Debtor by a substantial amount, and because of the rigorous scrutiny to be giver insider claims, this item is also disallowed. V. Mr. Zell’s 503(b)(1)(A) claim is barred due to his failure to disclose it. As an alternative holding, Mr. Zell contended at the hearing, contrary to his initial application, that he need not be appointed by the Court to serve. I have ruled that as a professional, his employment required co Inc., Case No. CV493-120, slip op. at 6-8 (S.D.Ga., Sept. 1, 1993) (Alaimo, J.) (<HOLDING>). ORDER Pursuant to the foregoing Findings of
holding that judicial estoppel was inapplicable where debtor omitted potential claim against defendant from chapter 7 schedules but orally disclosed it to the trustee during the meeting of creditors holding that section 1303 does not authorize the chapter 13 debtor to exercise the avoiding powers of a trustee holding in a case where a chapter 11 trustee was appointed after a period during which the debt or had operated as debtor in possession that a chapter 11 trustee has two years from the date of his appointment not from the commencement of the chapter 11 case to bring avoidance actions holding that a chapter 7 trustee was the only person with authority to bring  a cause of action after the appointment of a trustee holding that judicial estoppel does not preclude a chapter 7 trustee from bringing a suit which the debtor failed to list on her schedules