CURIAM. Appellant, John Mark Vaughan, Jr., filed a Rule 3.800(a) motion, claiming that his sentence was illegal under Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The trial court denied the motion, finding that the sentence imposed under the unconstitutional 1995 sentencing guidelines could have been imposed under the valid 1994 guidelines. Unfortunately, the trial court failed to attach the relevant portions of the record to support this finding, which ordinarily would require reversal. See, e.g., Moore v. State, 741 So.2d 577 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (<HOLDING>). However, appellant failed to allege that the
holding that when a movant successfully challenges an illegal prr sentence in a rule 3800a motion at resentencing the movant is entitled to be present at sentencing represented by counsel with an opportunity to present mitigating evidence holding that burden is on trial court denying a facially sufficient rule 3800a motion to attach record establishing movant is not entitled to relief holding motion for substitution of judge properly denied where movant failed to attach affidavit holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to strike when movant failed to show prejudice holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient