article or order of court to enforce it, or holding of a hearing, shall in any manner relieve or absolve any person affected by such order or hearing from any other liability, penalty or forfeiture under law.” Based in part on this subsection, this Court has held that “[a]n implied private cause of action may exist for a violation by an insurance company of the unfair settlement practice provisions of W.Va.Code, 33-ll-4(9)[.]” Syllabus Point 2, in part, Jenkins v. J.C. Penney Cas. Ins. Co., 167 W.Va. 597, 280 S.E.2d 252 (1981), overruled on other grounds by State ex rel. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Madden, 192 W.Va. 155, 451 S.E.2d 721 (1994) (footnote added). In Jenkins, this Court explained that its “past acceptance of an implied cause of action for a. 691, 466 S.E.2d 542 (1995) (<HOLDING>). Because this Court has already determined
holding that a private right of action exists holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  33ll4la of the act recognizing that no private right of action exists for subsection a violations holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  331143 and 5 of the unfair trade practices act holding that no private right of action exists