a new clock for filing charges alleging that act.” Id. at 102, 122 S.Ct. 2061. See also Rivera v. P.R.A.S.A., 331 F.3d 183, 188-89 (1st Cir.2003); Figueroa-Garay v. Municipality of Rio Grande, 364 F.Supp.2d 117, 125 (D.P.R.2005). Therefore, “[discrete discriminatory acts are not actionable if time barred, even when they are related to acts alleged in timely filed charges.” Arroyo-Audifred v. Verizon Wireless, Inc., 431 F.Supp.2d 215, 219 (D.P.R.2006). Examples of “discrete acts” include: failure to renew contract, failure to hire for new position, suspensions from employment, deprivation of duties, failure to select plaintiff for unannounced employment positions, written counseling, and proposed admonishments and reprimands. See Ruiz-Sulsona v. U.P.R., 334 F.3d 157, 160 (1st Cir.2003) (<HOLDING>); Rivera-Torres v. Ortiz Velez, 306 F.Supp.2d
holding that failure to promote claim requires that plaintiff apply for  the position sought and granting summary judgment on title vii failure to promote claim where plaintiff did not apply for higher position quotation marks and citations omitted holding that failure to pay obligations under a contract is a material breach as a matter of law when parties explicitly state in the contract that failure to pay warrants termination holding that failure to renew a contract and failure to hire for a new position were discrete acts of discrimination pursuant to morgan holding that failure to renew contract was adverse employment action recognizing failure to renew contract as adverse action