demonstrations, the government nonetheless had probable cause to believe that she committed an offense relating to the April 12 Four Seasons incident. While Sennett’s status as a photojournalist may provide an innocent explanation for her presence at the April 12 Four Seasons vandalism, “[t]he fact that an innocent explanation may be consistent with the facts alleged ... does not negate probable cause.” United States v. Fama, 758 F.2d 834, 838 (2d Cir.1985). In short, given all the facts and circumstances summarized above pointing to probable cause, the added information that Sennett is a photojournalist provides only “[t]he possibility of an innocent explanation [that] does not vitiate properly established probable cause.” United States v. Booker, 612 F.3d 596, 601 (7th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). To conclude otherwise — that is, to accept
holding that officers had probable cause to arrest driver and two passengers where cocaine and contraband were found in glove compartment and backseat armrest of vehicle and none of the men offered any information regarding the ownership of the drugs and contraband on the ground that the drugs and contraband could have been in the possession of any one of the three vehicle occupants or all three of them jointly holding that contraband would have been inevitably discovered where agents conducted a warrantless search while obtaining a search warrant and later conducted a second legal search in which agents discovered contraband holding that federal agents had probable cause to search defendants truck for drugs and contraband even though defendants conduct was consistent with innocent behavior holding that under fourth amendment standards for determining probable cause for arrest and probable cause for search and seizure are same holding that officer who smelled burning marijuana while approaching defendants vehicle stopped for tail light violation had probable cause to search for contraband