An individual Chapter 7 bankruptey case usually results in the discharge of the debtor's debts, meaning that a ereditor may no longer initiate or continue any action against the debtor to collect a discharged debt. However, some types of debts are not discharged through bankruptey. See 11 U.S.C. § 528(a). The debtor continues to be liable for these types of debts to the extent that they are not paid in the Chapter 7 case. In particular, and relevant to Pearson and Fahy's claims, any debt "for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity" is not discharged by bankruptcy proceedings. 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). As a result, Pearson and Fahy argue that their claims survived the bankruptey proceedings and can be satisfied by garnishing Ka ) (<HOLDING>). Under the plain language of section 522(c),
holding nondischargeable postpetition interest on debt that was determined to be nondischargeable under section 523a2 as obtained by fraud holding that in a chapter 7 case postpetition interest on a nondischargeable tax claim is also nondischargeable holding that only the enumerated four types of nondischargeable debt are singled out for special elevated treatment and that nlo other nondischargeable claims are so elevated holding punitive damages nondischargeable under  523a6 when such damages are based on the same conduct as the underlying nondischargeable judgment holding that because nondischargeable debt based on fraud was not one of the four enumerated exceptions to exempt property the exempt property was not liable for the creditors surviving claim