Circuit Judge: The defendants were indicted on charges of holding individuals in peonage and involuntary servitude. The district court dismissed most of the counts. It concluded that those counts failed to sufficiently charge the defendants with a “holding” in involuntary servitude under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1581,1583, and 1584 (1982) because they failed to allege that the defendants used or threatened to use law or force. We hold that a violation of the peonage and involuntary servitude statutes may occur through conduct other than the use or threatened use of law or force and that all of the counts are sufficient to charge the defendants with the crimes enumerated. Accordingly, we reverse. The defendants are charged with violating 18 U.S.C. §§ 1581 (<HOLDING>), 1583 (enticement into involuntary servitude),
holding that in order to be compensable consequential damages must affect some right or interest that is different in kind not merely in degree from that suffered by the public in general holding that the same hearing officer as in this case erred in substituting his judgment for that of the pertinent school board in that case holding in peonage holding in an erisa case decided after greatwest that monetary relief in the form of prejudgment interest may be equitable in nature holding in termination of parental rights case that trial court erred in taking judicial notice of evidence before him in guardianship hearing in same case