of this section of the Sentencing Guidelines as follows: “Section 3A1.1 ... ‘will apply to increase the offense level where (1) a victim was either (a) unusually vulnerable due to age, physical, or mental condition, or (b) otherwise particularly susceptible to the criminal conduct, and (2) the defendant knew or should have known of such vulnerability or susceptibility.’” United States v. Scrivener, 189 F.3d 944, 950 (9th Cir.1999) (quoting U.S. v. Castellanos, 81 F.3d at 110). The vulnerable victim enhancement, therefore, may be predicated on a trait or condition that makes a victim “particularly susceptible to criminal conduct.” This Court has held that a wide range of victim characteristics can satisfy this requirement. See United States v. Wetchie, 207 F.3d 632, 636 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Weischedel, 201 F.3d 1250,
holding persons known to have fallen for telemarketing scams previously were particularly susceptible to criminal conduct holding a sleeping victim of sexual abuse was particularly susceptible to criminal conduct holding testimony of a 19yearold victim of criminal sexual conduct was sufficient for the jury to believe her story over that of the defendant holding a car salesman who was obligated to go on a drive with assailants was particularly susceptible to criminal conduct holding defendants prior conviction for assault related to sexual abuse of a minor even though it did not require an act of sexual abuse because it required intent to commit sexual abuse  and such a mens rea demonstrate the offense was one relating to sexual abuse