traumatic. See Li, 356 F.3d at 1158 n. 4. She actually testified that she did not know how her examination would have been conducted. The evidence also does not compel a reasonable fact-finder to conclude that Lin has a well-founded fear of sterilization upon her return to China. Lin does not provide any evidence that women (to say nothing of women who are not and have never been pregnant) who simply fail to take required pregnancy tests, have actually been sterilized. She also does not present evidence that the family planning committee in her town fined her for failing to appear for her first appointment, that they have issued a warrant for her arrest, or that they actually would sterilize her if she returned home. See Zhang v. Attorney General, 128 Fed.Appx. 287, 289 (3d Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). She also does not refer to any law or
recognizing that the governments inability to control the source of persecution may support a finding of a wellfounded fear holding that general crime conditions are not a stated ground for a wellfounded fear of future persecution holding that absent a pattern of persecution linked to the applicant persecution of family members is insufficient to demonstrate a wellfounded fear of persecution holding that an alien had no wellfounded fear of persecution for resisting chinas coercive population control program in part because he was not charged with a crime and there was no warrant issued for his arrest holding that absent past persecution an alien can demonstrate eligibility for asylum based on a wellfounded fear of future persecution by demonstrating that he or she subjectively fears persecution and that this fear is objectively reasonable