(same). 2. Plaintiffs appeal was properly before the Civil Service Commission and the City Council, which upheld his termination. Plaintiff made a general appearance in the administrative proceedings, notwithstanding his insistence to the contrary. See §66-368 Geary St., L.P. v. Superior Court, 219 Cal.App.3d 1186, 268 Cal.Rptr. 678, 681 (1990) (<HOLDING>). 3. The district court, at our instruction,
holding that one of the effects of submitting to the courts jurisdiction by making a general appearance is that a party waives any objection to service of process holding that defendant did not waive his special appearance by filing a motion for new trial subject to the special appearance holding that party waived special appearance holding that defendant did not waive special appearance holding that partys label of appearance as general or special does not control and that a request for continuance is a form of relief that a party may seek only by submitting to the courts jurisdiction