death.”); Steele v. Kootenai Med. Ctr., 142 Idaho 919, 920, 136 P.3d 905, 906 (2006) (recognizing the Idaho Legislature has adopted the common law of England providing a personal injury action abates with the death of the victim); Hayward v. Valley Vista Care Corp., 136 Idaho 342, 351 n. 2, 33 P.3d 816, 825 n. 2 (2001) (“[A]n action for personal injuries does not survive the death of the victim of the tort.”); Evans v. Twin Falls Cnty., 118 Idaho 210, 217, 796 P.2d 87, 94 (1990) (“[T]he common law has not been modified or changed in Idaho either by statute or the Constitution, and therefore the general common law rule that personal causes of action do not survive the death of the injured party is the rule in Idaho.”); Vulk v. Haley, 112 Idaho 855, 858-59, 736 P.2d 1309, 1312-13 (1987) (<HOLDING>); Craig v. Gellings, 148 Idaho 192, 219 P.3d
holding that pain and suffering does not survive the death of the injured recognizing as an element of pain and suffering holding that a jury cannot award damages for medical expenses and lost wages without also awarding damages for pain and suffering where the plaintiff was injured due to the defendants negligence recognizing as separate from pain and suffering holding that claims for pain and suffering are the separate property of a spouse