right of all persons within its jurisdiction to be free from criminal attack, to be secure in their possessions and to live in peace.” Ibid, (emphasis added). The enumerated “goals .of the department,” one of which Anderson highlights, similarly confine the Department’s . ambitions to “[protection of life, limb, and property in the City of Chicago” Id. at II.A (Doc. 53-1 at 7) (emphasis added). This is common sense. The Chicago Police Department’s law enforcement responsibilities within the city limits are daunting enough as it is, and Wheaton has its own police force to handle matters in Wheaton. Only conduct that advances an officer’s employer’s particular objectives, not those of other entities that may have related goals, satisfies the third criterion. See Copeland, 408 F.3d at 934 (<HOLDING>). Anderson’s contrary position—that when the
holding there was enough evidence to find the defendant abandoned his child when he claimed to have knowledge of cpss involvement he admitted that for periods of two years and six months he did not attempt any contact with his child and from the date he canceled a home study until the petition was filed he did not attempt to contact the child or cps or provide support even when he was out of jail holding a mothers ingestion of a controlled substance while pregnant does not constitute child abuse as an unborn child is not a person for purposes of criminal prosecution holding that a correctional officer was not motivated to serve his employer the county jail when he purposefully allowed inmates to attack a pretrial detainee suspected of child abuse reasoning that cjourts and courts alone are charged with imposing punishments for criminal child abuse while jails merely provide the vehicle for doing so holding the record does not show that the statement to the social worker was for medical treatment because the social worker testified that he questioned the child to determine whether he needed to notify child protective services of a case of suspected child abuse holding an unborn child is not a child for purposes of criminal prosecution of mistreatment of a child