maritime law), vacated on this ground on petition for reh’g, 513 F.2d 911 (5th Cir.) (per curiam) (following Gaudet), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 840, 96 S.Ct. 71, 46 L.Ed.2d 60 (1975)). Ten days later, the Supreme Court overruled Canal Barge in Gaudet, where it permitted a widow to recover loss-of-society damages for the maritime wrongful death of her husband. See, e.g., Landry, 511 F.2d at 143 (citing McDonald v. Federal Barge Lines, Inc., 496 F.2d 1376, 1377 95 (5th Cir.1973) (affirming a summary judgment dismissal of a father’s wrongful death case for lack of standing, where the decedent’s widow, who was also the decedent’s personal representative and the administratrix of his estate, had previously settled with the defendants). 33 . 395 F.Supp. 978, 983-85 (E.D.La.1975) (Rubin, J.) (<HOLDING>). 34 . This reading of Hamilton follows the
holding that the evidence did not support a finding that the parents intentionally abandoned their child holding that parents who had shown a modest loss of support were entitled to recover for loss of their sons society as well even though their son had left a posthumous child holding that parent of adult son who became deranged could not recover for loss of consortium because the damages were too remote holding that loss of an arm includes loss of the hand holding that proof of loss is not evidence of extent of loss and insured is not precluded from showing his damages were greater than shown in proof of loss