mental anguish does not constitute prejudice in this case. The original state-court petition put Defendant on notice that Plaintiff Reyna alleged mental anguish. Moreover, since a party may amend its complaint to add new claims or theories of liability, e.g., Bamm, Inc. v. GAF Corp., 651 F.2d 389, 391 (5th Cir.1981); Ward Electronics Serv., Inc. v. First Commercial Bank, 819 F.2d 496, 497 (4th Cir.1987), it seems incongruous to deny Plaintiff an opportunity to correct the defect in his complaint merely because it might entitle him to greater damages. See Yorden v. Fiaste, 374 F.Supp. 516, 521 (D.Del.1974) (stating that defendant is not prejudiced even though change of plaintiff would increase measure of damages); WXON-TV, Inc. v. AC. Nielsen Co., 742 F.Supp. 418, 420-21 (E.D.Mich.1990) (<HOLDING>). Indeed, Rule 15(a) also requires the Court to
holding that liquidated damages provision did not provide adequate remedy at law or prevent injunctive relief holding that language of contract did not limit plaintiffs recovery to liquidated damages holding that television stations failure to claim liquidated damages under its contract with television ratings service did not preclude it from later amending its complaint to claim such relief holding that  1 narrowly construed did not exclude employment contract of television news reporter holding that claim for damages based on repair estimate is not a liquidated damage