And the Commission fails to explain how access to these complaints will, vis-a-vis other information already in its possession or under request, further its investigation or civil prosecution against the energy company. To abrogate the privilege under these circumstances, the court would have “to pile inference upon inference,” United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 567, 115 S.Ct. 1624, 131 L.Ed.2d 626 (1995) — in effect, not merely overriding the privilege but burying it. On Request No. 6, therefore, the court vindicates McGraw-Hill’s objection. B. The Commission Made Reasonable Efforts to Exhaust Alternative Sources Even when a party demonstrates need, the privilege will not be abridged absent an attempt to obtain the information from other reasonable sources. Zerilli, 656 F.2d at 713 (<HOLDING>). This requirement reflects the principle that
holding that a person violates  10b and rule 10b5 when he misappropriates confidential information  in breach of a duty owed to the source of the information holding that even when the information is crucial to a litigants case reporters should be compelled to disclose their sources only after the litigant has shown that he has exhausted every reasonable alternative source of information holding that the right of access to government information or sources of information within the governments control is not mandated by the first or fourteenth amendments holding that a partys need for grand jury materials varies in proportion to the degree of access he has to other sources of the information he seeks holding that the prisoner has the burden of demonstrating he has exhausted his administrative remedies in his complaint