217 B.R. 540, 542 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1997); In re Price, 97 B.R. 264, 266 (Bankr.E.D.N.C.1989); In re Mosley, 55 B.R. 341, 343 (Bankr.W.D.Ky.1985); Stewart v. Tenn. Wholesale Drug Co. (In re Haynes), 41 B.R. 423, 425 (M.D.Tenn.1984). See also Midlantic Nat’l Bank v. Bridge (In re Bridge), 18 F.3d 195, 204 (3rd Cir.1994) (chapter 7 trustee’s rights as hypothetical bona fide purchaser prevailed over mortgagee’s rights as holder of unrecorded equitable lien); Simon v. Chase Manhattan Bank (In re Zaptocky), 232 B.R. 76, 83-84 (6th Cir. BAP 1999) (chapter 7 trustee, in exercise of his strong-arm rights as bona fide purchaser, can avoid equitable interest that mortgagee possessed pursuant to defectively executed mortgage); Wolf v. Mahrdt (In re Chenich), 100 B.R. 512, 515 (9th Cir. BAP 1987) (<HOLDING>). As stated by the court in Godwin: [T]he
holding that one who acquires legal title with notice of a prior equitable interest in the property is not a bona fide purchaser recognizing that chapter 7 trustee as hypothetical bona fide purchaser takes title to the real property free from all equitable liens holding that a bona fide purchaser may be considered in privity with its predecessor holding that generally a bona fide purchaser without notice of easements takes the property free of such easements holding that in idaho a bona fide purchaser is one who acquires title to real property without notice actual or constructive of any outstanding adverse rights of another