so ordered on August 13, 2002 extended the time to November 31, 2002; the Eighth Stipulation so ordered on November 24, 2002 extended the time to January 3, 2003; the Ninth Stipulation so ordered on December 13, 2002 extended the time until April 4, 2003; the Tenth Stipulation so ordered on March 17, 2003 extended the time until June 30, 2003 and the Eleventh Stipulation so ordered on June 10, 2003 extended the time until September 30, 2003. 19 . The Debtor incorrectly asserts, in bold print in its Objection, that Burger Boys stands for the proposition that extensions require notice and a motion. See Objection at ¶ 115. 20 . See also, Edward J. Debartolo Corp. v. Child World, Inc.; Net Realty Holding Trust v. Child World, Inc. (In re Child World), 146 B.R. 89, 92 (S.D.N.Y.1992) (<HOLDING>). 21 .The failure to pay post-petition rent and
holding that extension of exclusive liability to project owners did not violate due process or equal protection rights of injured workers holding that courts will dismiss an appeal as moot unless an actual case or controversy exists at all stages of the judicial or administrative process holding that the bias streamlining procedure does not violate an aliens due process rights holding that ex parte extensions of time to assume or reject leases had for all practical purposes only an administrative rather than a substantive effect and do not violate due process unless the party asserting improper procedure can demonstrate that they were substantially or irreparably injured holding that doctrine does not violate due process