CURIAM. REVERSED. See Mitchell v. Moore, 786 So.2d 521 (Fla.2001) (<HOLDING>); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.540(b)(5). MINER, DAVIS and
holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively holding that the statute does not apply retroactively to claims accruing prior to the effective date holding that the copy requirement of the prisoner indigency statute is unconstitutional retroactively holding that prisoner sentenced on basis of two prior unconstitutional convictions had to be resentenced holding that the language of the statute and the courts duty to apply the statute as written requires the court to interpret the statute to apply when the prisoner is sentenced without regard to the institution where the prisoner is incarcerated after the sentencing