contained only conclusory assertions by a third-party informant about a future event without supporting facts to constitute probable cause. See People v. Young, 987 P.2d 889, 893 (Colo.Ct.App.1999) (stating that “[a] bare bones affidavit is one that contains only conclusory statements devoid of facts from which a magistrate can independently determine probable cause”); State v. Rodriguez, 64 Ohio App.3d 183, 580 N.E.2d 1127, 1130-31 (1989) (finding that affidavit which simply stated a conclusory allegation of criminal activity without stating the basis for the informant’s knowledge is “bare bones”). An executing officer, making an objective assessment of the warrant, would find no facts in the warrant to support a reasonable, 1996); see also Atkins, 9 Va.App. at 464, 389 S.E.2d at 180 (<HOLDING>). Only by blindly accepting the informant’s
holding that the vehicle of a recent occupant may be searched incident to arrest as an exception to the warrant requirement where it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest holding that a warrant lacking a description of items to be seized was not facially invalid and finding in the alternative that even if the warrant were found to be deficient the seized evidence was admissible under the good faith exception recognizing that the nexus between the place to be searched and the items to be seized may be established by the nature of the item and the normal inferences of where one would likely keep such evidence internal quotation marks omitted holding that evidence was admissible under the good faith exception where the affidavit contained a detailed description of the nature of the offense the premises to be searched the items for which they were searching and the transaction which led the informant to believe that the drugs would be in this apartment holding that officers possession of affidavit at searched premises without leaving a copy with the occupant was insufficient to allow for consideration of the affidavit in evaluating the constitutionality of the warrant