the integrity and order of its territory and the welfare of its members ...” Felix S. Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law ("Federal Indian Law ”), Ch. 4, § C5 at 252 (1982). 2 . The Bill of Rights is not applicable to Indian tribes. "Indian tribes are not states of the union within the meaning of the Constitution, and the constitutional limitations on states do not apply to tribes.” Federal Indian Law, Ch. 12, § E2 at 664-65; Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. at 56, 98 S.Ct. at 1675-76 ("As separate sovereigns pre-existing the Constitution, tribes have historically been regarded as unconstrained by those constitutional provisions framed specifically as limitations on federal or state authority.”); Talton v. Mayes, 163 U.S. 376, 384, 16 S.Ct. 986, 989, 41 L.Ed. 196 (1896) (<HOLDING>). 3 . The ICRA has been held to apply for the
holding that the fifth amendment did not apply to tribal government holding that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to interpret a tribal constitution or tribal laws holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege holding the fourteenth amendment does not apply to the actions of the federal government holding that tribal courts are not subject to the fifth amendments requirement of indictment by grand jury