by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bobby Smith appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Black, 737 F.3d 280, 287 (4th Cir.2013) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Blewett, 746 F.3d 647, 650,
holding that  3582c2 does not authorize a resentencing but merely provides for a sentence reduction within the bounds established by the sentencing commission and that booker does not apply to  3582c2 proceedings holding that although probation statute was repealed by sentencing reform act old provision continued to apply to offenses which occurred before effective date of act nov 1 1987 holding that the statute does not apply retroactively to claims accruing prior to the effective date holding that the fsas more lenient penalties apply to defendants who committed their crimes before the acts effective date but were sentenced after that date holding that  3582c2 does not provide means to apply fair sentencing act fsa minimums to defendants sentenced before fsas effective date