such person[ ]... [d]oes any ) (a) (697 SE2d 310) (2010) (“[When] conjunctive pleadings set forth more than one act by which the accused committed the crime, the evidence is sufficient so long as it shows at least one of the acts alleged. If a crime may be committed in more than one way, it is sufficient for the State to show that it was committed in any one of the separate ways listed in the indictment, even if the indictment uses the conjunctive rather than disjunctive form.” (punctuation omitted)). 12 Brown v. State, 295 Ga. App. 542, 544 (672 SE2d 514) (2009). 13 Id. 14 See Obeginski v. State, 313 Ga. App. 567, 569 (1) (722 SE2d 162) (2012) (“The child victim’s testimony alone authorized [the defendant’s] convictions on the crimes c SE2d 582) (2004) (punctuation omitted). 28 Id. (<HOLDING>); see also Arrington, 286 Ga. at 346 (16) (c)
holding that comment by prosecutor in closing argument that defense counsel did not produce evidence of the defendants innocence was not a comment on the defendants failure to testify holding the prosecutors statements were not an inappropriate comment on the defendants failure to testify but rather a comment on the defendants failure to present convincing evidence to support his defense recognizing the right of a defendant to comment upon the failure of the state to produce evidence holding that the prosecutors reference to the nonexistence of mitigating evidence was not a comment on the defendants failure to testify holding that state did not comment upon defendants failure to testify when it questioned during closing arguments why defendant never gave police the murder weapon because the comment was a valid attack on the credibility of the defendants claim that the homicide was justified