50 Id. at 111-12. 51 Id. at 118-19 (quoting Henry Campbell Black, Handbook of American Constitutional Law 519 (2d ed. 1897)). 52 530 U.S. 466, 120 S. Ct. 2348, 147 L. Ed. 2d 435 (2000). 53 Id. at 490 (alteration in original) (quoting Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227, 252, 119 S. Ct. 1215, 143 L. Ed. 2d 311 (1999) (Stevens, J., concurring)). 54 67 Wn. App. 339, 835 P.2d 251 (1992). 55 Id. at 345. 56 State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 333, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 57 Id. 58 127 Wn.2d 322, 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). 59 Id. at 333-34. 60 Id. (footnote omitted) 61 State v. Hutchinson, 111 Wn.2d 872, 881-83, 766 P.2d 447 (1989). 62 State v. Hutchinson, 135 Wn.2d 863, 882-83, 959 P.2d 1061 (1998). 63 Reply Br. of Appellant at 24. 64 See State v. Carneh, 153 Wn.2d 274, 282, 103 P.3d 743 (2004) (<HOLDING>). 65 149 Wn. App. 266, 202 P.3d 383 (2009). 66
holding that the statement ill take the fifth was an assertion of the fifth amendment privilege holding that application of statutory mandatory minimum in  841b1a does not violate defendants fifth and fourteenth amendment rights holding state had violated the defendants fifth amendment rights and consequently was prohibited from using any of the information revealed during courtordered treatment program in later separate criminal prosecution holding that courtordered examinations of those defendants who plead insanity and the admission of this examination is not an infringement of the defendants fifth amendment rights holding that a defendants fifth amendment rights were violated when an interpreter was withdrawn by the court