excluded from article. This article does not apply * * * to the creation or transfer of an interest in or lien on real estate, including a lease or rents thereunder. Essentially, the Alsups maintain that while the interest is personalty, it also represents an interest in real estate and should be considered a “transfer” within the meaning of Section 55 — 9—104(j). According to the Alsups’ argument, this Section should be interpreted broadly to exclude any transfer of an int table Dev. Corp.), 617 F.2d 1152 (5th Cir.1980) (applying Florida law, held Article 9 applied to a security interest in contract rights and contract proceeds regardless of the fact that real property was also assigned); Southwest Nat’l Bank v. Southworth (In re Southworth), 22 B.R. 376 (Bankr.D.Kan.1982) (<HOLDING>); Erikson v. Seattle Trust & Sav. Bank (In re
holding that a broadcasting license was property of the estate but not subject to a security interest holding vendors right to receive payment under a land sale contract was personal property and a security interest representing that personal property right constituted realty paper and was subject to article 9 holding that a judgment lien attaches to a vendors interest in an executory land contract recognizing that the government may seek a personal judgment specific property or substitute property holding that the land contract vendors were entitled to insurance benefits when before the fire that damaged the subject property the vendors obtained a judgment of forfeiture based on the vendees default on the land contract