to consider only those documents that are part of the appellate record. 6 . Texas Farmers Insurance Company, Mid Century Insurance Company of Texas & Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm”) and United Services Automobile Association ("USAA”). 7 . In that bulletin, the Texas Department of Insurance states that its intent in promulgating the standard personal auto policy form was not to require payment for inherent diminished value. 8 . The Texas Insurance Commission was the 197 N.Y.S. 460, 461 (N.Y.App.Div.1922) (“We think diminution in value is damage embraced within the clause of the policy insuring plaintiff ‘against direct loss or damage' by the perils of ‘theft, robbery or pilferage.’ 246 Cal.Rptr. 593 (1988) (<HOLDING>); Bickel v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 206 Va.
holding that if the insurer cannot return the vehicle to substantially the same condition then the actual cash value is the appropriate measure where insured sued for damages caused by insurers inappropriate election to repair and the value after repairs was almost sixty percent less than its preloss value holding that when the insurer elects to repair or replace the damaged  part with other of like kind and quality less depreciation the insurer is obligated to put the automobile in substantially the same condition it was prior to the collision so as to render it as valuable and serviceable as before with the insured being compensated for any deficiency in loss of actual value holding that an insurer has no obligation to pay diminished value in addition to repairs holding that depreciation could not be deducted from cost to repair building to its condition prior to fire under actual cash value policy holding insurer was not obligated to repair the damaged automobile to both its preaccident condition and market value concluding that permitting coverage of diminished value would render meaningless the insurers clear policy right to repair rather than pay actual cash value