resolution authorizing such representation. Where a Member of Congress is not appointed to sue, he must demonstrate personal injury, Harrington, 553 F.2d at 199-200 n. 41. However, he can do so indirectly by showing (1) injury in fact to Congress and (2) injury to himself, as an individual legislator, because of the harm done to the institution. Id. Here, Congress' exclusion from the withdrawal revocation process constitutes injury to Congress. Because of this exclusion, Congressman Seiberling lost a concrete opportunity to exercise his voting authority as a Member of Congress. The fact that he was also Chairman of the Subcommittee on Public Lands does not diminish his standing as an individual legislator. See National Wildlife Federation v. Watt, 571 F.Supp. 1145, 1147 (D.D.C.1983) (<HOLDING>). 6 . Defendants claim that only 845 acres are
holding that there was no standing where the prospective future candidacy of a former congressman was involved holding that failure to obtain information subject to disclosure under federal advisory committee act constitutes a sufficiently distinct injury to provide standing to sue recognizing standing of congressman udall as a congressman and as a committee chairman holding that standing existed recognizing associational standing when members would have standing in own right