of rights under the New Mexico Constitution unless the NMTCA contains a waiver of immunity. “In the absence of affirmative legislation, the courts of this state have consistently declined to permit individuals to bring private lawsuits for damages to enforce rights guaranteed by the New Mexico Constitution, based on the absence of an express waiver of immunity under the Tort Claims Act.” Barreras v. N.M. Corr. Dep’t, 133 N.M. 313, 319, 62 P.3d 770, 776 (Ct.App.2002). See Chavez v. City of Albuquerque, 124 N.M. 479, 482, 952 P.2d 474, 477 (Ct.App.1997) (noting that a plaintiff cannot seek damages for violations of rights under the New Mexico Constitution unless immunity is waived under the NMTCA); Rubio v. Carlsbad Mun. Sch. Dist, 106 N.M. 446, 449, 744 P.2d 919, 922 (Ct.App.1987) (<HOLDING>); Begay v. State, 104 N.M. at 488, 723 P.2d at
holding that nature of alleged bias must be personal and not arising out of litigation holding that no waiver of immunity exists for damages arising out of alleged educational malpractice claim against a school board holding that no recovery exists for speculative damages holding that a  1983 claim for damages was not prohibited by claim preclusion because the plaintiff could not have sought damages in his prior article 78 proceeding arising out of the same facts recognizing absolute immunity for attorneys and board members of the texas medical board