that Dr. Haberer’s qualifications to assess causation may be established by the facts that Reglan’s manufacturer disclosed tardive dyskinesia as a known complication and that the report details that three physicians diagnosed her with dyskinesia related to her Reglan use. Courts have held that in addressing causation, a reporting physician may rely on the opinions of other individuals who have rendered reports or diagnoses. See Kelly v. Rendon, 255 S.W.3d 665, 676 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, no pet.) (noting that “nothing in the health care liability statute prohibits an otherwise qualified physician from relying on [another opinion] in the formation of the physician’s own opinion”); Cresthaven Nursing Residence v. Freeman, 134 S.W.3d 214, 234 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2003, no pet.) (<HOLDING>); see also Tex.R. Evid. 703 (stating that an
holding physician in action based on illegal cavity search to standard of a reasonable physician holding that a testifying physician properly relied in part on the opinions of other doctors in establishing causation recognizing it is common and reasonable for doctors to examine medical records and arrive at professional opinions holding that the evidence relied on by the insurer need not include the opinion of an examining physician holding that the alj properly relied on the assessments of a nonexamining physician and not claimants treating physicians in determining the rfc at step four