See Hudson, 577 F.3d at 883 (“Resisting arrest by fleeing inevitably invites confrontation, as it calls the officer to give chase .... ” (quotation omitted)). It is this potential for violence that the Court has identified as the risk associated with burglary, one of § 4B1.2(a)(2)’s example crimes. See James v. United States, 550 U.S. 192, 203, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007). Far from being passive, a highspeed chase “involves violent force” and “is similar to the behavior underlying an escape from custody, which, as the Supreme Court noted in Chambers, is ‘less passive’ and ‘more aggressive’ than that likely underlying failure to report.” Harrimon, 568 F.3d at 535 (quoting Chambers, 129 S.Ct. at 691); see also United States v. Furqueron, 605 F.3d 612, 614-16 (8th Cir.2010) (<HOLDING>). For these reasons, we hold that eluding under
holding walkaway escape under north dakota statute a crime of violence holding that escape from secure custody is a violent felony holding that an escape from custody under minnesota law is a crime of violence holding that theft from the person is not a crime of violence holding felony escape in north carolina to be crime of violence under acca because escape presents risk of injury to others