again in this regard is that neighboring Damroseh and Dante Parks are open to other expressive uses, further indicating that the Plaza, by contrast, is intended to serve a more limited function. See Int'l Soc’y for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. v. Lee, 505 U.S. 672, 680, 112 S.Ct. 2701, 120 L.Ed.2d 541 (1992) (“[Separation from acknowledged public areas may serve to indicate that the separated property is a special enclave, subject to greater restriction.”). Finally, plazas that serve as forecourts in performing arts complexes are not the types of public spaces that have traditionally been dedicated to expressive uses, or in which the government’s ability to restrict speech has historically been circumscribed. See Hawkins v. City & County of Denver, 170 F.3d 1281, 1287-88 (10th Cir.) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 871, 120 S.Ct. 172,
holding that the center island mall in front of the fairfax county government center complex is a traditional public forum holding that a courthouse was a nonpublic forum but an unenclosed courthouse plaza was a designated public forum holding that the courthouse lobby was a nonpublic forum holding that the fact that a speech regulation is now being enforced  is not enough to convert the property into a nonpublic forum holding that an enclosed forecourt to a performing arts center is a nonpublic forum