CURIAM. Edward King appeals the granting of the State’s motion, filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), which sought to vacate the portion of his sentence which “allowed a total of 334 days as credit for time incarcerated prior to imposition of this sentence.” However, rule 3.800(a) prohibits the filing of such a motion during the pendency of a direct appeal. See Day v. State, 770 So.2d 1262 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (<HOLDING>). Because the State filed this motion during
holding that a rule 3800a motion that does not allege that the court records show the defendants entitlement to additional jail credit is facially insufficient holding that effective january 13 2000 a party may not file a rule 3800a motion during the pendency of a direct appeal holding that the public defender was not authorized to file a motion collaterally attacking the defendants sentence and affirming the trial courts dismissal of perrys rule 3800a motion filed by the public defender without prejudice to perrys right to file such a motion pro se holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the courts oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3800a motion holding that since district court of appeal properly found that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on a 3850 motion during the pendency of a direct appeal the district court of appeal should have vacated the order rather than affirming on the merits