the offense of conviction, the conviction cannot qualify as an ACCA predicate. Holloway, 630 F.3d at 257. An offense qualifies under ACCA’s residual clause if the offense poses a risk “comparable to that posed by its closest analog among the enumerated offenses.” Sykes v. United States, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 2267, 2273, 180 L.Ed.2d 60 (2011). In this case, Defendant has pleaded guilty to three violent felonies under Massachusetts law, two of which have been held by the First Circuit to qualify categorically as violent felonies, and a third which clearly would qualify based on the holdings of the Commonwealth’s courts. Defendant pleaded guilty to larceny from the person in 1989, which qualifies as a violent felony under ACCA. See United States v. Rodriguez, 659 F.3d 117, 119 (1st Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). In 1990, Defendant pleaded guilty to assault
holding south carolina conviction for failure to stop for a blue light to be violent felony under acca because prohibited conduct creates potential for confrontation and violence holding massachusetts conviction for larceny from the person constitutes violent felony under the residual clause of the acca holding that a massachusetts conviction of larceny from the person qualifies as a violent felony because the potential for confrontation and physical injury invariably exists holding that vehicular manslaughter qualifies as a violent felony under section 924e2bii in that it involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another  holding categorical approach to determine whether a prior conviction qualifies as a violent felony for acca purposes raises no sixth amendment issue