noted by the Tenth Circuit in Friedman v. Board of County Commissioners of Bernalillo, a case involving the incorporation of the Latin cross on a city seal. In Friedman, the court expressed concern lest [a] person approached by officers leaving a patrol car emblazoned with this seal could reasonably assume that the officers were Christian police, and that the organization they represented identified itself with the Christian God. A follower of any non-Christian religion might well question the officers’ ability to provide even handed treatment. A citizen with no strong religious conviction might conclude that secular benefit could be obtained by becoming a Christian. Friedman, 781 F.2d 777 (10th Cir.1985) (en banc), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1169, 106 S.Ct. 2890, 90 L.Ed.2d 978 (1986) (<HOLDING>). As the Friedman court further concluded, the
holding that district courts decision regarding defendants minor role status was not clearly erroneous holding that this court will only set aside district courts factual findings when they are clearly erroneous holding that the district courts finding of no discrimination was not clearly erroneous because the finding was supported by the record holding district courts order upholding county seal clearly erroneous holding bankruptcy courts finding of proximate causation not to be clearly erroneous