been traditionally referred to as “procedural” due process. Id. 2. The Rights of Aliens to Due Process Examination of Hall’s due process claim begins with a review of the scope of the due process rights to which he is entitled. As an alien, Hall does not receive the full panoply of Constitutional protections and rights afforded to American citizens. Reno v. Flores, 507 U.S. 292, 305-06, 113 S.Ct. 1439, 123 L.Ed.2d 1 (1993). The degree to which an alien is entitled to protections and afforded rights by the Constitution is dependent on the particular classification of the alien. Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763, 770, 70 S.Ct. 936, 94 L.Ed. 1255 (“The alien, to whom the United States has been traditionally hospitable, has been accorded a generous and ascending sca 30 L.Ed. 220 (1886) (<HOLDING>). On this ascending scale, deportable aliens
holding that lprs are entitled to the protection of the equal protection clause holding that the state law violated equal protection principles holding that the cap does not violate equal protection holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection holding that since congress created separate classifications for lawful permanent residents lprs and nonlawful permanent residents nlprs and treated each class differently throughout the immigration statutes lprs and nonlprs are not similarly situated and different treatment of them does not violate the equal protection component of the due process clause