disclose the identity of a human source, interfere with a human source’s cooperation, or reveal legally privileged information. If full disclosure is not made for the reasons indicated, then, whenever feasible, the FBI field office shall make at least limited disclosure to a law enforcement agency or agencies having jurisdiction, and full disclosure shall be made as soon as the need for restricting disclosure is no longer present. Guidelines § VI(C)(2). The district court concluded that in spite of mandatory-sounding language — “the field office shall promptly transmit” — the Guidelines “as a whole, ... as well as the factors set forth for consideration, clearly refute[ ] the conclusion that Guideline § VI(C)(2) mandated disclosure.” Gonzalez, 2013 WL 308762, 61 (1st Cir.1991) (<HOLDING>). Even if an agent receives information that is
holding that where a dea manual provided that any bureau chief receiving an allegation or complaint indicating a possible leak of confidential dea information will ijmmediately notify internal security personnel bureau chiefs had discretion to determine what comprised an allegation or complaint  holding that whether a personnel policy manual modifies an employment contract is a question of fact holding that similar language provided a sufficient general jurisdiction allegation holding that conclusory allegation of leak of confidential information without more failed to create inference of fraudulent intent holding that conclusory allegation in complaint was insufficient to demonstrate that defendant offered to sell goods within new york