from this line of cases is that if large shopping malls are not public fora for First Amendment purposes, than neither is a single retail store such as Super Target of Grand Forks. If the Super Target is not a public forum, then Defendant did not violate Plaintiffs First Amendment rights when it denied him access to its store for the purpose of collecting signatures for a petition. PruneYard Shopping Center, 447 U.S. at 81, 100 S.Ct. 2035 (citing Hudgens, 424 U.S. at 517-21, 96 S.Ct. 1029). Plaintiff has conceded this poi 918) (finding that the legislature did not violate the North Dakota Constitution by allowing an exemption of a benefit provided by a fraternal beneficiary society from attachment or garnishment); State ex rel. Linde v. Taylor, 33 N.D. 76, 156 N.W. 561, 564 (1916) (<HOLDING>). The actual purpose of Section 2 is to fulfill
holding that under separation of powers the legislative department makes the laws the executive department carries the laws into effect and the judicial department interprets and declares the laws holding that executive branch prosecution of disciplinary charges against a judge violated the separation of powers provision in the nevada constitution a provision identical to article v section 1 of the utah constitution recognizing in the psc context that a legislative delegation of power to a legislative or executive agency permitting an agency to declare what the law is violates floridas separation of powers doctrine holding executive branch prosecution of disciplinary charges against judge before commission violated separation of powers clause in nevada constitution holding that the executive legislative and judicial departments are public servants which must exercise their powers in the manner provided by the constitution