and interstate commerce. Additionally, it was undisputed in McGuire that the catering business did not lose money or customers due to the defendant’s conduct. Id. at 211. Here, to the contrary, there was certainly adequate evidence from which a jury could infer that the robbery was an attempt to — and did in fact — affect a business operating in interstate commerce. The appellants invite us to follow the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and impose a heightened interstate commerce requirement when the victim of the alleged crime is an individual rather than a business. In United States v. Wang, the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that the Hobbs Act interstate commerce nexus was too attenuated where the defendant robbed the owners of a business in their ho 8th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Collins, 40 F.3d 95, 99-100
recognizing that  the interstate nexus requirement is satisfied by proof of a probable or potential impact on interstate commerce holding that the government can satisfy the hobbs act interstate commerce requirement by showing that the robbery resulted in the closure of a business engaged in interstate commerce holding two elements are essential for a hobbs act prosecution robbery and an effect on commerce holding that the robbery of two individuals en route to a liquor store did not have a potential effect on interstate commerce holding that housing discrimination has a substantial effect on interstate commerce