performance of a professional 890 P.2d 214, 222 (Colo.Ct.App. 1994) (reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs and holding that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury that the cleric could not be held liable if his massage of the minor plaintiff “was engaged in solely in a sincere effort to facilitate the minor’s communication with God”). We are also persuaded that the distinction suggested in Dausch v. Rykse, supra, between pastoral counseling and secular psychological counseling, is unworkable because it is difficult to apply. A cleric’s ling culminating in a sexual relationship with a counselee and other types of harms allegedly resulting from a failed counseling relationship. Cf. Nally v. Grace Community Church of the Valley, supra, 253 Cal.Rptr. 97, 763 P.2d at 948 (<HOLDING>). Thus, we do not share the concern expressed
holding statement that plaintiff was antisemitic not actionable holding that the plaintiffs stated a claim for conspiracy because they alleged an actionable tort holding that claim for sons suicide was not actionable holding even though mother was a nurse she had no legal duty to prevent her 21yearold sons suicide holding that an actionable  20a claim must be preceded by an actionable primary violation under  10b