at issue but made no attempt to pump gas. He later went to the second station and again made no attempt to pump gas. Taken as a whole, the facts are not as consistent with innocent activity as criminal conduct, and they support a finding that Minassian was arrested in a suspicious place under circumstances that raised a reasonable belief that he had committed a crime. See Dyar, 125 S.W.3d at 464-85 (a place may become suspicious when circumstances raise a reasonable belief that a person has committed a crime there); Hall, 795 S.W.2d at 197 (the proper inquiry is not limited to whether the actual activity observed is innocent or criminal but instead concerns the degree of suspicion reasonably aroused by the observed activity); Lunde v. State, 736 S.W.2d 665, 667 (Tex.Crim.App.1987) (<HOLDING>). Thus, the trial court did not abuse its
holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment recognizing that a search incident to a lawful arrest permits a law enforcement officer to conduct a warrantless search of a container located in the area of the arrestees immediate control holding a warrantless arrest by a law officer is reasonable under the fourth amendment where there is probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being committed holding  1983 action lies for warrantless arrest without probable cause holding that another statutory provision authorizing warrantless arrest was satisfied despite that fact that law enforcement did not observe overtly criminal conduct