to watch television, exercise in a gymnasium, and work in the kitchen. Then the prosecutor listed all the things the four-year-old victim would never be able to do, such as go to school, get in fights with her sister, and worry her mother. In addition, the prosecutor argued that because of defendant’s conduct, Alecia never knew her sister or mother. At the very end of his argument, the prosecutor turned his attention to the murder of Mr. Worley: James Worley I’m sure had dreams. He had aspirations. And he had things he wanted to do in his life. Elton McLaughlin took that away from James Worley. He took that away from James Worley for three thousand dollars. Although defendant concedes that the United States Supreme Court overruled Booth v. Maryland, 482 U.S. 496, 96 L. Ed. 2d 440 (<HOLDING>), reh’g denied, 483 U.S. 1056, 97 L. Ed. 2d 820
holding that eighth amendment prohibited consideration at sentencing of personal characteristics of the victim and the emotional im pact of the crimes on the victims family holding that malicious or sadistic use of force with intent to harm violates the eighth amendment holding that use of a victim impact statement during sentencing violated the eighth amendment holding that the victim impact and victim vulnerability aggravators were not overbroad and explaining that though the concepts of victim impact and victim vulnerability may well be relevant in every case evidence of victim vulnerability and victim impact in a particular case is inherently individualized holding eighth amendment does not barper se prosecutorial comments on victim impact