to pass muster under the Fourth Amendment. See Gutierrez v. State, 221 S.W.3d 680, 685-86 (Tex.Crim.App.2007). “Probable cause to search exists when reasonably trustworthy facts and circumstances within the knowledge of the officer on the scene would lead a man of reasonable prudence to believe that the instrumentality of a crime or evidence of a crime will be found.” Estrada v. State, 154 S.W.3d 604, 609 (Tex.Crim.App.2005). In reviewing the evidence, we consider the “totality of the circumstances” known to the police at the time of the search. Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983). The circumstances supporting a finding of probable cause may include flight or similar evasive conduct. See United States v. Macias, 546 F.2d 58, 61 (5th Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>); Pyles v. State, 755 S.W.2d 98, 109
holding that where a qualified drug dog alerts to the presence of contraband in a vehicle officers have probable cause to search the vehicle holding warrantless search of defendants automobile four days after impoundment was permissible under requirements of fourth amendment and state constitution where officers had probable cause to search vehicle when it was impounded and that probable cause continued between the time of the impoundment and the search holding that the smell of marijuana gave the police probable cause to search the vehicle holding officers had probable cause to search vehicle that made uturn to avoid checkpoint and appeared to be loaded down holding that where other evidence established probable cause to believe that the defendant possessed controlled substances investigating officers had probable cause to search the defendants purse for similar evidence