you are hereby advised that pleading guilty or nolo contendere to a crime may affect your immigration status now or in the future. Admitting guilt may result in immigration consequences even if the charges are later dismissed. Your plea or any admission of guilt that you make in this court may result in your deportation or removal from the United States, could prevent you from ever being able to obtain legal status in the United States, or could prevent you from becoming a U.S. citizen.’ ”); cf. State v. Francis, 2004-Ohio-6894, ¶ 20, 820 N.E.2d 355 (when immigration warning was enclosed within quotations, holding trial court was required to recite language verbatim). ¶ 9. We discern no substantive difference between the phrase “may have the consequences of’ as us 2003) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 11. Defendant also contends that the court
holding defendant must have a full understanding of what the plea connotes and its consequences holding that right to effective assistance of counsel requires that defendant be advised of immigration consequences of plea holding that an attorney is required to advise a defendant of the direct consequences of a plea and will not be found ineffective for failing to advise of collateral consequences of the plea holding that warning that this plea may have a bearing on whatever relationship you have with the immigration and naturalization service completely failed to specify consequences of plea as required by statute holding that warning that plea might have some effect upon what happens with the immigration service was inadequate because court did not identify specific consequences required by statute