3108, 41 L.Ed.2d 1039 (1974).”). 4 . In EEOC, which involved a claim by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against a university that the school had denied tenure for invalidly discriminatory reasons, the court stated its holding as one which recognized the privilege "in the context of challenges to college or university tenure decisions.” 715 F.2d at 337. The present proceeding does not challenge the University of Miami’s decision to deny tenure but rather seeks damages against named individuals for defaming him in the course of that process. 5 . EEOC recognizes that the privilege it established gives way to a showing of a " 'particularized need’ for relevant information,” 715 F.2d at 338; see Gray v. Board of Higher Education, City of New York, 692 F.2d 901 (2d Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>); see generally, Herbert v. Lando, 441 U.S.
recognizing a corporations legal rights to confidentiality and privilege recognizing academic privilege but holding plaintiffs need for information outweighed colleges interest in confidentiality recognizing privilege recognizing records material to selfdefense claim outweigh victims interest in confidentiality holding accuseds right to fair trial outweighed newsmans interest in protecting sources and privilege must yield