Kendrick — Montgomery to Houston County, 104 miles; and (6) Gary Turner — Escambia County to Butler County, 62 miles. Significantly, fifteen of the plaintiffs will continue to work in the same city in which they are presently employed, while twelve of the plaintiffs will be required to travel less than fifty miles. The court notes that the reassignments directed by Commissioner Nachman are not unique and that state agencies frequently reassign their employees from one city or county to another when the need arises. See Sullivan v. Teague, 424 So.2d 574 (Ala.1982) (upholding the reassignment of a. Department of Education employee from the position of vocational rehabilitation counselor II to position as a disability examiner in another city); Williams v. James, 420 So.2d 773 (Ala.1982) (<HOLDING>). In sum, the court finds that the evidence
holding that county and district attorneys are officers within the judicial department holding that the commissioner of the department of pensions and security had statutory authority to reassign state employees to the county level holding that probation department employees are not county employees holding in absence of formal procedure a county employees phone call to the county commissioner sufficed  to fulfill whistleblower acts requirement to initiate a grievance procedure before filing suit holding that the county attorney had de facto authority and noting that the objection to the county attorneys authority was first made on appeal