his treatment of his patients suffered. Id. Emphasizing the confidential nature of these documents, the Court denied plaintiffs request. The Court also noted, however, that plaintiff could easily have learned about the doctor’s workload by simply examining his appointment book. Id. at 470. In the case at bar, while plaintiff does seek back pay, as she notes in her opposition, what she really seeks is the reinstatement of two WIGIs that she contends were unfairly denied her. Plains. Opp. at 2. In other words, her earnings for the period from 2005 to the present are irrelevant to the amount she would have earned had she received the WIGIs to which she claims she was entitled. Cf. Butler v. Exxon Mobil Refining and Supply Co., No. 07-CV-386, 2008 WL 4059867, at *2 (M.D.La. Aug. 28, 2008) (<HOLDING>). While the cost to plaintiff of producing the
holding that social security benefits should not be set off from adea lost wages award holding that prejudgment interest may properly be added to damage awards for past lost wages medical expenses that have been incurred and past pain and suffering but not future loss of earnings future medical expenses andor future pain and suffering holding that plaintiffs can obtain reimbursement for past or future educational expenses under the idea but not general damages such as compensation for lost earning power holding that carriers consent required if past and future benefits might exceed settlement holding that plaintiff placed his income and earning capae ity at issue by seeking inter alia past and future lost wages and benefits