the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider it. The criminal rules do not explicitly provide for rehearing or reconsideration of a criminal judgment; however, the Supreme Court has allowed such motions. See United States v. Cook, 670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir.1982) citing United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 225, 80 S.Ct. 282, 286, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960) and Browder v. Director, Department of Corrections of Illinois, 434 U.S. 257, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). These motions are within the district court’s jurisdiction to consider, but only if timely filed. As we stated in Russo, the “motion for reconsideration ... filed over ten days after entry of the order was therefore untimely.” Russo, 760 F.2d at 1230, citing United States v. Cook, 670 F.2d 46, 48 (5th Cir. 1982) (<HOLDING>). In Cook, the Fifth Circuit persuasively held
holding no court has jurisdiction to hear an untimely pcra petition holding that untimely petition for postconviction petition divests trial court of jurisdiction holding that the untimely petition in that case tolled the aedpa statute of limitations holding that an untimely postjudgment motion does not toll the time for filing a notice of appeal and that this court has no jurisdiction over an untimely filed appeal holding that an untimely petition for a rehearingreconsideration of a motion in a criminal case was beyond the district courts jurisdiction