on a negative answer to Question One. 2 . In her request for a supplemental record, Mason stated, "This request for the above parts of the Reporter’s Record in the above case are made pursuant to Rule 34.6(c)(1) T.R.A.P., as the points of error on appeal deal with the alleged erroneous charge submitted to the Court and harmful error which occurred during jury argument.” Even if this statement was timely filed, we find that it does not satisfy the requirements of Rule 34.6(c)(1) because it does not identify the portions of the charge or the jury argument Mason intended to appeal, leaving appellees to guess what additional evidence they should include in the reporter’s record. See Gardner v. Baker & Botts, L.L.P., 6 S.W.3d 295, 297 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). 3 . In B.L.D., Justice Wainwright describes
holding that statement of issues requires appellant to designate with reasonable particularity the complaints to be pursued on appeal holding that appellant complied with rule 3as requirement to designate the judgment or order appealed where it was clear from the face of the notice of appeal which judgment appellant sought to appeal holding trial court reversibly erred in not permitting appellant to withdraw his plea where court erroneously stated appellant could appeal motion was in fact not dispositive and appellant was entitled to rely on the courts statement holding that appellant did not limit his issues on appeal by gratuitously listing only some of those issues in his notice of appeal holding that a rule 10b5 claim must be stated with particularity