which the electorate reasonably could have believed that the classification would further the purpose of environmental safety. Clover Leaf Creamery, Co., 449 U.S. at 464, 101 S.Ct. at 724; MSM Farms, Inc., 927 F.2d at 333. Under this standard, the Court concludes that there was evidence before the electorate in the form of the public administrative hearings as well as other sources of information about Lonetree from which the electorate could reasonably have believed that the Referendum would further the protection of South Dakota’s environment. The fact that the electorate chose not to subject the legislative approval granted to the Big Stone Power Plant to the referendum process does not invalidate the Referendum against Lonetree. See Dukes, 427 U.S. at 303-05, 96 S.Ct. at 2517-18 (<HOLDING>). Finally, SDDS argues that defendants have
holding that a legislature need not strike out all evils at one the same time holding that the defendants burden at this stage is one of production not one of persuasion holding that a state may only partly ameliorate a perceived evil at one time and that the failure of a regulation to eliminate all of an evil at one step does not make the regulatory classification irrational holding that the defendant may not state one ground at trial and another on appeal holding that the distinction between a preparatory step and a substantial step constituting a direct movement toward commission of the intended offense is one of fact not law