offense, and the date of adjudication. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7B-2411. In J. V.J., the court made the following findings in its written order of adjudication: Based on the evidence presented, the following facts have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt: The court finds that Joseph is responsible. J.V.J., 209 N.C. App. at 740, 707 S.E.2d at 638 (brackets omitted). Because section 7B-2411 requires the court to state in a written order that the allegations of the petition are proved beyond a reasonable doubt and because the adjudication order in J. V.J. did “not even summarily aver that ‘the allegations in the petition have been proved[,] ’ ” we held that the adjudication order in that case was deficient for failing to include appropriate findings of fact. Id. at 740-41, 707 S.E.2d at 638. (<HOLDING>). This case is distinct from J. V.J. Here,
holding that the court failfed to include the requisite findings in its adjudication order and noting that rather than addressing the allegations in the petition in the adjudication order the court merely  indicated through a fragmentary collection of words and numbers that an offense occurred and stated that joseph was responsible  holding adjudication order based upon a determination on the merits in juvenile court is a final and appealable order holding that the petition was not properly denied where the trial courts stated reason for denying the petition was that the defendant was afforded a break in the criminal justice system because he received a withhold of adjudication and early termination of probation holding that an adjudication on summary judgment is an adjudication on the merits holding that an order to show cause was deficient when it merely stated that the defendant had violated a prior court order and did not include the facts that purportedly constituted the criminal contempt