Stinger’s claims, and that agreement was not unconscionable. Therefore, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. AFFIRMED. * Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. 1 . Shordy after Stinger’s account became active, Bank One Corporation merged with JPMC, which led to a transfer of ownership of Stinger’s account to Chase. 2 . Stinger asserted claims for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing; tortious interference with his contract with Bank of America; violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Tex. Bus. & Com.Code Ann. § 17.46; breach of contract; conversion; fraud and neglig l.Rptr.2d 273, 288-89 (1998) (<HOLDING>); Carboni v. Arrospide, 2 Cal.App.4th 76, 2
holding that judicial is review available in the absence of an agreement for arbitration or some other form of final resolution of a dispute holding that a credit card company could not introduce an alternative dispute resolution provision through a bill stuffer where nothing in the original agreement mentioned dispute resolution holding that a party that engages in discovery and files pretrial motions waives a contracts alternative dispute resolution provision holding that the defendant companys action in sending a representative to ohio to negotiate a resolution of a prior dispute did not confer personal jurisdiction holding that the federal arbitration act requires piecemeal resolution when necessary to give effect to an arbitration agreement and mandates enforcement of an arbitration agreement notwithstanding the presence of other persons who are parties to the underlying dispute but not to the arbitration agreement emphasis added