to conduct further review. In re Emmanuel Nursing Home, 411 N.W.2d 511, 516 (Minn.App.1987), review denied (Minn. Oct. 13, 1987); Johnson v. Metro. Med. Ctr., 395 N.W.2d 380, 382 (Minn.App.1986). Here, unlike in Pfalzgrajf and Steams-Hotzfield, the ULJ did not amend the June 11, 2004 decision within the 30-day appeal period. Rather, the ULJ corrected the error 68 days after it issued its original decision — 38 days after the decision became final. Once the ULJ’s decision became final, the entire department— including the ULJ and the SURJ — lacked jurisdiction to consider the matter further. Nieszner, 499 N.W.2d at 838. Without jurisdiction, the ULJ lacked the legal authority to correct an erroneous decision. See Mackler v. Bd. of Educ., 16 N. J. 362, 108 A.2d 854, 857-58 (1954) (<HOLDING>); Boydston v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 166
holding that a statutory basis is necessary for an administrative body to initiate reconsideration of its prior final quasijudicial decisions holding that an administrative agency is not subject to a contempt proceeding for failure to comply with an order holding that while trial courts are encouraged to state all findings in their written orders they are not required to do so as long as the basis for their decisions is clear from the record and thus susceptible to review holding that administrative decisions are subject to reconsideration as long as the agency still retains control of the proceeding holding that the court may not overturn the administrative law judges factual findings as long as they are supported by competent substantial evidence