fleeing truck — they engaged in a high speed pursuit of the truck, they set up rolling and stationary roadblocks and they fired shots that struck the truck’s tires, radiator and window. Id. at 1330-31. All these efforts were unsuccessful. The truck finally came to a stop after a police officer, attempting to disable the truck’s engine, fired a shot that struck David Cole in the forehead. Id. at 1331. The court held that the driver was seized only when he was struck by the bullet, concluding that the officers’ pursuit of the truck, the shots fired by the officers that struck the truck and the rolling and stationary roadblocks did not constitute a seizure because these assertions of authority failed to produce a stop. Id. at 1332-33; see also Brower, 489 U.S. at 597, 109 S.Ct. at 1381 (<HOLDING>) (first emphasis added); United States v.
holding a fourth amendment seizure oceurs when an officer fatally shoots a fleeing suspect holding that a fourth amendment seizure of a fleeing suspect occurs only when there is a governmental termination of freedom of movement through means intentionally applied  holding that fifth amendment custody is a restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest holding that a fourth amendment violation entails governmental termination of freedom of movement through means intentionally applied  holding that in the fourth amendment context a seizure of property occurs when there is some meaningful interference with an individuals possessory interests in that property