of nationality are either aware of his activities or likely to become aware of his activities.”); see also Jian Xing Huang, 421 F.3d 125 at 128-29. The agency also reasonably determined that Lin had not established a pattern or practice of persecution against Christians in China because the country conditions evidence in the record indicated that enforcement against underground churches varied throughout China and the Chinese government’s treatment of members of underground churches constituted harassment rather than persecution. See Siewe v. Gonzales, 480 F.3d 160, 167 (2d Cir.2007) (“[wjhere there are two permissible views of the evidence, the fact finder’s choice between them cannot be clearly erroneous.”); Ivan-ishvili v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 483 F.3d 332, 341 (2d Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233, 1240 (3d
holding that harm must be sufficiently severe and rise above mere harassment holding that to constitute persecution the harm must be sufficiently severe rising above mere harassment holding that to constitute persecution the harm must rise above mere harassment holding that harm must be sufficiently severe rising above mere harassment to constitute persecution holding that persecution must rise above unpleasantness harassment and even basic suffering