LGE’s claims against DTK-NJ, as a reseller, are peripheral to the main patent infringement claims against Advance and DTK, as the manufacturers of the infringing products. b. Outcome of Adjudication of Manufacturer’s Claim Adjudication of LGE’s patent infringement claim against Advance or DTK will dispose of any claims against DTK-NJ. As a reseller of the infringing products, DTK-NJ is liable only if a court were to find Advance or DTK liable. See generally Corry, 16 F.Supp.2d at 665; Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, 370 F.Supp. at 972. If the Court finds Advance or DTK liable, and LGE collects royalties from Advance or DTK, then LGE cannot in turn collect royalties from the entities to whom Advance and DTK sold the products. See Intel Corp., 995 F.2d 1566, 27 U.S.P.Q.2d at 1138-39 (<HOLDING>). On the other hand, if the Court holds that
holding a nonparty to a patent infringement suit who funded an unsuccessful challenge to a patent could not file a subsequent lawsuit again challenging the patent holding in a patent infringement case that plaintiff lacked standing where it held a conditional right to license a patent and enforce license agreements but did not have the right to transfer the patent holding that after reading the patent a person of skill in the art would not understand the patentee to have invented a generic method where the patent only disclosed one embodiment of it holding that a patentee can collect only one royalty from a patent infringement holding that knowledge of the patent is required for willful infringement