Jones, 363 Mo. 998, 255 S.W.2d 801, 806 (1953) (finding juror misconduct, the court then considered whether the prosecution had met its burden of proof); State v. Bayless, 362 Mo. 109, 240 S.W.2d 114, 123 (1951) (declining to decide whether juror misconduct occurred and addressing the issue of burden of proof only after assuming juror misconduct for the purpose of disposing of the issue); State v. Choate, 600 S.W.2d 37, 42 (Mo.App.1980) (stating that an unsupported allegation of juror misconduct in motion for new trial does not shift the burden of proof to the prosecution to affirmatively show absence of improper influence). 5 . Chambers, 891 S.W.2d at 101. 6 . Shirrell v. Missouri Edison Co., 535 S.W.2d 446, 448 (Mo. banc 1976). 7 . See State v. Gaitan, 442 S.W.2d 530, 533 (Mo.1969) (<HOLDING>); State v. Jackson, 412 S.W.2d 428, 432
holding law enforcement request for identification not tantamount to seizure finding no constitutional violation when law enforcement conduct consisted simply of questioning employees and arresting those they had probable cause to believe were unlawfully present holding that a question about present employment in field of law enforcement did not trigger disclosure of past employment in field of law enforcement holding that law enforcement commission was a benefit of employment holding that state law enforcement agencies fall under prosecutors control for purposes of rule 151 disclosure holding that nigcs individual background files are law enforcement records subject to exemption 7c and that in the absence of a waiver disclosure is not required by foia because individuals mentioned in law enforcement investigatory reports  have a presumptive privacy interest in keeping their names undisclosed