course of reasoning and, therefore, the trial court did not err. We agree with the State. The right to be represented by counsel, guaranteed by Article 1, Section 10, of the Texas Constitution, includes the right of counsel to question the members of the jury panel to intelligently exercise peremptory challenges. Shipley v. State, 790 S.W.2d 604, 608 (Tex.Crim.App.1990). A trial judge is given wide discretion to control voir dire; however, permissible areas of questioning the panel to exercise peremptory challenges are broad and cannot be unnecessarily limited. Id. The trial court’s decision to restrict voir dire may only be reviewed to determine whether the restriction constitutes an abuse of discretion. Allridge v. State, 762 S.W.2d 146, 163 (Tex.Crim.App.1988 5 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (<HOLDING>). Improper questions include asking a venire
holding the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow a question seeking to determine bias or prejudice in favor of the victim because she was a nun holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the withdrawal of the juiy trial waiver holding the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow a question to prospective jurors on their feelings against recommending probation as punishment in a murder case holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to conduct hearing and render decision on motion holding trial court abused its discretion by refusing to allow questions regarding victims status as a child