statutory violation is deeply ingrained. We are virtually the only jurisdiction that permits a private cause of action for violations of statutes requiring sidewalks to be in good repair.” Jenkins, 167 W.Va. at 600, 280 S.E.2d at 255 (footnote and citations omitted). We also based our decision on the fact that “the administrative remedy provides no direct relief for an injured-person, but only provides sanctions against the company or fines in favor of the State.” Jenkins, 167 W.Va. at 605, 280 S.E.2d at 257(footnote omitted). Finally, this Court noted that “the strong policy declaration in our statute against unfair insurance practices initially suggests the appropriateness of a private cause of action.” Id. See also Mutafis v. Erie Ins. Exchange, 174 W.Va. 660, 328 S.E.2d 675 (1985) (<HOLDING>) and Morton v. Amos-Lee Securities, Inc., 195
recognizing that no private right of action exists for subsection a violations holding that a private right of action exists holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  33ll4la of the act holding that a private cause of action exists for violations of wva code  331143 and 5 of the unfair trade practices act holding that a cause of action exists under the connecticut unfair trade practices act for violations of the cuipa