firearms and unsworn falsification to authorities. 3 . Sanders claims that he never received the June letter, and that he instead found out about the problems with his background check in a conversation with a Human Resources official early in July. 4 . Sanders received a probationary sentence on the marijuana and firearms charges, and the rape and reckless endangerment charges were dismissed. 5 . Any claim relating to the September job openings is not properly before us, as Sanders failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with regard to that hiring decision. This does not mean, however, that the VA's failure to hire him for these positions cannot be relevant to Sanders’ other claims. Cf. National R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 113, 122 S.Ct. 2061, 153 L.Ed.2d 106 (<HOLDING>). 6 . Specifically, Sanders submitted
holding that title vii statute of limitations does not bar an employee from using  prior acts as background evidence in support of a timely claim holding that the doctrine of qualified immunity does not protect a government official who is sued in an official capacity under title vii because title vii does not impose personal liability holding that a title vii plaintiff could not hold coworkers liable in their individual capacities under title vii recognizing title vii does not provide the exclusive remedy for all employment discrimination claims even if the title vii and section 1983 claim factually overlap holding that plaintiffs failure to exhaust available grievance procedures does not bar her title vii claims