had “intended to decide [the] case in accordance with applicable law” and then had made a mistake of law. 121 N.J.Super. at 55, 296 A.2d 72. There was no showing that the mistake of law was so gross as to infect the award and make it unrepresentative of the arbitrator’s real judgment; nor was the mistake even shown to be obvious or apparent “on the face of the award.” In fact, the Brooks court ignored the second prong of Held altogether, and held that mere mistakes of law, without more, are a valid basis for reversing arbitration awards. Ibid. Subsequent cases, relying on Brooks, have compounded the error, and have opened the floodgates for judicial review of arbitration awards. E.g., Selected Risks Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 179 N.J.Super. 444, 451, 432 A.2d 544 (App.Div.) (<HOLDING>), certif. denied, 88 N.J. 489, 443 A.2d 705
recognizing that prevailing party has remedies available at common law to enforce arbitrators award holding that arbitrators award will be vacated if    mistaken as to applicable law holding that an award may be in excess of the arbitrators powers if it requires the public employer to perform an act that is prohibited by law or if it does not involve legitimate terms and conditions of employment holding that arbitrators award of temporary interim equitable relief can be confirmed holding that an arbitrators award should have been vacated