to sell explosives stolen from the United States. The sale occurred on December 29, 1976, and the indictment was filed on December 29, 1981. Id. at 899. The “[defendants moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the prosecution was barred by the five-year period of limitations provided in 18 U.S.C. § 3282.” Id. at 900. “On the premise that the day of the last overt act is counted as the first day of the limitations period,” the defendants in Guerro, lik nciple was equally applicable to criminal prosecutions for substantive offenses as well as conspiracy charges. See Guerro, 694 F.2d at 903. In United States v. Butler, 792 F.2d 1528 (11th Cir.1986), the defendants challenged their convictions for conspiracy to import and possess marijuana, 1534 (9th Cir.1993) (per curiam) (<HOLDING>) Admittedly, this Court has noted in conspiracy
holding that for purposes of oneyear statute of limitations where accident occurred on february 1 1988 a leap year the determination of whether this action is time barred shall be made on the basis of considering a year having 366 days and concluding action filed on february 1 1989 was timely holding that a fiveyear limitation period for a crime completed on february 15 1986 expired on february 151991 holding that where conversion occurred on september 4 1935 twoyear limitation period expired on and with september 4 1937 holding fiveyear limitation period in 28 usc  2462 runs from date of predicate violation not from date of administrative assessment of sanction holding that  851es fiveyear limitation is not unconstitutional because it is reasonably tailored to impose enhanced sentences on recidivists