Judge. The defendant, Eddie Franklin, appeals the denial o A 2006)(<HOLDING>); Eloisaint v. State, 868 So.2d 680 (Fla. 3d
holding that rule 3850 motion was not time barred where the order did not place any time limitation on when the defendant would refile his rule 3850 motion holding that defendants 3850 motion for postconviction relief was procedurally barred as successive where the defendants current rule 3850 motion is one that could have or should have been raised in his first rule 3850 motion holding that postconviction court could not deny a refilled rule 3850 motion as untimely when postconviction court did not set a filing deadline in dismissing defendants first rule 3850 motion without prejudice to refiling holding that claims raised on direct appeal are procedurally barred from consideration in a rule 3850 motion holding defendant was not barred from raising sentencing issue in rule 3850 motion by virtue of prior rule 3850 motion which did not raise any sentencing issues