he must prove that it caused actual, compensable injury beyond the injury of being convicted and imprisoned. Harper’s sufferings from loss of “recreational activities,” “confidence,” and “sleep” (Complaint at 6) are injuries stemming entirely from his incarceration. By contrast, his First Amendment and Due Process claims, although they would not have arisen were Harper not in custody, do go beyond an injury inherent in conviction and imprisonment. A review of the record shows that Harper’s allegations are conclusory and fail to set forth a factual basis for his claims. While Harper’s complaint contains claims cognizable under Bivens, it does not state facts sufficient to support his allegations of violations of the First, Fourth, and Fourteenth Amendments. See Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110 (<HOLDING>). This deficiency remains even after Harper
holding conclusory assertions of intent to cause insufficient without supporting facts holding that allegations against nondiverse defendants must be factual not conclusory because conclusory allegations do not state a claim holding that conclusory allegations without supporting factual averments are insufficient to state a claim on which relief can be based citations omitted holding affidavits based on conclusory allegations insufficient at summary judgment holding that conclusory allegation of conspiracy without supporting factual averments insufficient to state claim