Agency for Health Care Admin., Case No. 153764MTR (Fla. DOAH Jan. 28, 2016); Gibbons v. Agency for Health Care Admin., Case No. 13-4720MTR (Fla. DOAH May 7, 2014); cf. Silnicki v. Agency for Health Care Admin., Case No. 13-3862MTR (Fla. DOAH July 15, 2014). Two more features of this case make clear that limiting the scope of the lien to past medical expenses makes sense. First, AHCA agreed to the allocation of damages. The parties’ stipulation poses no risk of collusion. AHCA, the agency tasked with administering Florida’s Medicaid program, acknowledged that Mr. Willoughby was not made whole as to his past medical expenses. AHCA had no incentive to skew the allocations of the 21st Century settlement in a way that reduces its lien for paid medical expenses. Cfi Giraldo, 208 So.3d at 247 (<HOLDING>). Second, Mr. Willoughby is no longer eligible
holding that fraud on the court must be supported by clear unequivocal and convincing evidence holding that despite the lack of a statutory requirement that severe child abuse be shown by clear and convincing evidence due to the consequences of such a finding the clear and convincing standard must be applied holding that a bad faith claim must be met through the clear and convincing evidence standard holding that in reviewing a defendants motion for judgment of acquittal based on insanity which the defendant must prove by clear and convincing evidence the court must determine whether no reasonable jury could have failed to find that the defendants criminal insanity at the time of the offense was established by clear and convincing evidence holding that alj properly concluded that allocation agreed to in settlement agreement between victim and tortfeasor was not clear and convincing evidence and could not be credited as reasonable products of armslength adversarial negotiation