purposes is to be determined by relevant surrounding circumstances, such as “the number and type of firearms, the amount and type of ammunition, the location and circumstances of possession and actual use, the nature of the defendant’s criminal history ..., and the extent to which possession was restricted by local law.” USSG § 2K2.1 cmt. n.6 (2008). The defendant has presented no evidence that the firearms found in the gun safe, gun cabinet, or hobby workroom are of the type normally included in a gun collection. Nor has any evidence been offered to demonstrate that they were used for sporting purposes. That they were kept for “sentimental” reasons does not merit a reduction. For these reasons, I will overrule the objection to the guideline calculation. It is so ORD h Cir.1996) (<HOLDING>). 3 . In addition, of course, Mrs. Skeens kept
holding that a defendant who had maintained his fathers gun collection at his home deserved a reduction under ussg  2k21b2 holding that adult child who maintained his own residence separate from his fathers household but regularly vacationed and kept gear at his fathers vacation home was not a resident of his fathers household and therefore not an insured under his fathers insurance policy covering the vacation home holding defendant who was employee of and had key to his fathers business  premises searched  lacked standing to challenge search of building his father owned holding a consent voluntary when a defendant who had been warned of his rights and knew police were investigating murders turned his gun over to a policeman who suggested that he could sell the gun for the defendant holding that a defendant who had constructively possessed a shotgun that was owned by his brother and used solely for lawful sporting purposes was entitled to a reduction under ussg  2k21b2