and knowing full well of whatever you do, you’re going to get reversed on one of them. And that’s not a very good position to put this Court in and [appellant] because they should have made an election at some point in time of whether they wanted to go with involuntary or the aggravated [involuntary] manslaughter. And I would ask you to reconsider striking the aggravated [involuntary] manslaughter and just go on the involuntary manslaughter. Appellant’s objection was specific enough to alert the trial court to the basis for his objection, and he was not required to use the words, “double jeopardy,” or to cite any particular provision of Code § 18.2-36.1 in order to preserve this issue for appeal. See Lash v. County of Henrico, 14 Va.App. 926, 929, 421 S.E.2d 851, 853 (1992) (en banc) (<HOLDING>); cf. Martin v. Commonwealth, 13 Va.App. 524,
holding that a deposition that was not presented to the trial court could not be considered on appeal holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal holding rule 5a18 does not prohibit reliance on statutes or cases not presented to the trial court to support on appeal a position otherwise adequately presented at trial holding that complaint on appeal must be the same as that presented in the trial court holding that a party may not raise a claim on appeal that was not presented to the trial court