to her supervisors about the offensiveness of the racial comments. See Herrera, 474 F.3d at 680-81 (noting plaintiffs unheeded complaints of harassment to employer’s human resources attorney as evidence that she was subjectively offended). Ms. Hernandez marshaled sufficient evidence of both objective and subjective offensiveness to withstand summary judgment. See Herrera, 474 F.3d at 680-81. A reasonable jury could find that Ms. Hernandez was offended by the work environment and that a reasonable person likewise would be offended. a. District Court’s Analysis The district court relied on Bolden, 43 F.3d at 551, in holding that Ms. Hernandez failed to demonstrate a “steady barrage of opprobrious racial comments.” “In Bolden, we held that only two overtly 3d 767, 777 (10th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>), said that Ms. Hernandez provided “few
recognizing that conclusory statements do not preserve an issue for appeal holding that vague conclusory statements are insufficient holding vague allegations of bias insufficient holding affidavits based on conclusory allegations insufficient at summary judgment holding vague and conclusory allegations of nefarious intent and motivation are insufficient to state a claim