had been obtained, even though they had obtained Jackson’s written consent to search. These precautions taken by the officers demonstrate their good faith in conducting the search of Taylor’s apartment in compliance with the law. There is no evidence to suggest that any of the other three exceptions to the Leon good faith exception would apply to the search of Taylor’s apartment. Therefore, even if a Fourth Amendment violation occurred, the Leon good faith exception applies to prevent the exclusion of evidence obtained from the search of Taylor’s apartment pursuant to the corrected search warrant. Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine Taylor argues that the good faith exception was negated in this case because the officers’ successful attempt to use Jackson’s key in the lock o st Cir.)(<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 920, 111 S.Ct. 295,
holding in credibility context that explanations for inconsistent statements must be compelling rather than merely plausible holding that the legislature imposed a requirement implicitly rather than by means of statutory language expressly stating the requirement holding that the insertion of a key into a padlock was merely a means of identifying ownership rather than a search holding that prior convictions are merely sentencing enhancements rather than elements of the offense holding that standard of review is a matter of procedural rather than substantive law