73 (citation omitted). In determining “what the[ ] government is up to,” the relevant public interest is not to find out what was the substance of an agency investigation, but rather the focus is on the conduct of the agency that performed the investigation: Official information that sheds light on an agency’s performance of its statutory duties falls squarely within that statutory purpose. That purpose, however, is not fostered by disclosure of information about private citizens that is accumulated in various governmental files but that reveals little e based purely on gathering information about an individual, there is a cognizable public interest in knowing how a government agency goes about investigating high-ranking officials. See Citizens for Responsibility, 746 F.3d at 1093-94 (<HOLDING>). The plaintiff, in this case, has not
recognizing the significance of public interest in knowing how the fbi investigates highranking officials recognizing the significance of control in strict products liability recognizing significance of employers history of  8 violations recognizing the public interest exception holding that alleged misconduct by public officials particularly by law enforcement officials is matter of public concern