to personal jurisdiction. Thiele v. Stich, 425 N.W.2d 580, 584 (Minn.1988); see Amdahl v. Stonewall Ins. Co., 484 N.W.2d 811, 814 (Minn.App.1992) (applying this rule to service on a corporation), review denied (Minn. July 16, 1992). We are asked to determine whether leaving a summons and complaint with a 14-year-old child staying at a home for a six-day, non-custodial visitation is sufficient for substitute service of process on an individual. Peterson argues his stepson is a resident of Iowa and his brief visit to Minnesota does not qualify as “then residing therein” under Rule 4.03(a). See Firemen’s Ins. Co. v. Viktora, 318 N.W.2d 704, 706-07 (Minn.1982) (analyzing “residency in a household” in no-fault context); Grier v. Estate of Grier, 252 Minn. 143, 147, 89 N.W.2d 398, 402 (1958) (<HOLDING>). But for service of process, “residence” means
holding that a warrant authorizing the search of a residence vehicles at the residence and all persons found in the residence was not overly broad given that search was limited to places were drugs or weapons might be found holding that a realestate appraisal was not a guarantee of the condition of the residence but a valuation of the residence and thus not a misrepresentation holding residence means legal residence for will probate holding that residence in the cnmi before 2009 was not residence in the united states for naturalization purposes holding that it is permissible under the fourth amendment to detain occupants of a residence while executing a search warrant of the residence