Porter v. Epps, 659 F.3d 440, 445 (5th Cir. 2011). According to Thorn, the dismissal of his ticket as part of a plea deal and the district attorney’s rejection of his drug charge demonstrate that Officer McGary’s initial stop and Officers McGary and Bryant’s subsequent arrest lacked foundation and, thus, demonstrate that his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. We disagree. According to the facts deemed admitted, Thorn’s vehicle was parked in the roadway of a winding two-lane street, which an officer would reasonably view as posing a danger to both the vehicle’s occupants and other motorists and as constituting a traffic violation. Therefore, Officer McGary’s initial stop did not violate the' Fourth Amendment. See United States v. Rideau, 969 F.2d 1572, 1574 (5th Cir. 1992) (en banc) (<HOLDING>). Neither did Officers McGary and Bryant’s
holding that an officers reasonable mistake of law can give rise to the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the fourth amendment holding that a dog sniff of a vehicle during a traffic stop conducted absent reasonable suspicion of illegal drug activity did not violate the fourth amendment because it did not implicate any legitimate privacy interest holding that warrantless arrest based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment holding that a search of a students purse that was not based on probable cause did not violate the fourth amendment holding that a stop based on reasonable suspicion and serving a community earetaking function did not violate the fourth amendment