being where a statute indicates otherwise, as is the case here with 42 Pa.C.S. § 3561 when read in conjunction with Allegheny County Local Rule of Court 255. 5 . Interest is to cease running with its filing. The insurer’s failure to act sooner to mitigate the accrual of interest, under principles of equity — one who sits on his rights cannot complain thereafter of wrongs incurred, justifies the time set for the cessation of interest-accumulation. Cf. Booker Bros. Co., supra at 358. As an aside, we note that the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s payment of monies into court was unaccompanied by any reason for the denial. We would ask that any future refusal or grant be accompanied by reasons. See McCanna & Fraser Co. v. Continental Hotel Co., 252 Pa. 482, 484, 97 A. 700 (1916) (<HOLDING>). 6 . While the order for deposit is more
holding that an insurer is not liable for punitive damages by its refusal to pay a claim unless such refusal is accompanied by a malicious intent to injure or defraud holding that the best interest of the child standard should be used in deciding whether to grant a paternity petition holding that we may not review a district courts refusal to grant a downward departure unless the court mistakenly believed that it lacked the authority to grant such a departure holding that a refusal to grant such a petition should nevertheless be accompanied by reasons therefore holding that  best interest of the child standard should be used in deciding whether to grant a paternity petition