insured that the coverage provided by this policy applies only when the vessel is operated by: George Zaglool.” Notably, the provision does not state that it supersedes and replaces the “Covered Persons” provisions. Cf. Steadfast Ins., 283 A.D.2d at 50-51, 727 N.Y.S.2d at 398. While it could be argued that to the extent there is a conflict between the terms of the endorsement and the terms of the preprinted form, the terms of the endorsement should control, the rule is, as noted earlier, that “where two seemingly conflicting provisions reasonably can be reconciled, a court is required to do so to give both effect.” Steadfast Ins., 283 A.D.2d at 51, 727 N.Y.S.2d at 399. Accord County of Columbia v. Continental Ins. Co., 83 N.Y.2d 618, 628, 612 N.Y.S.2d 345, 349, 634 N.E.2d 946 (1994) (<HOLDING>). In order to give effect to both provisions,
holding that a standard wcel policy with a maritime endorsement is an ocean marine policy holding an endorsement to an existing insurance policy which added a new vehicle did not create a new contract of insurance but was merged with and became a part of the original policy recognizing that endorsement would prevail if inconsistent with policy provisions holding that an insured was not entitled to recover through their endorsement coverage where the policy actually required the insureds to repair rebuild or replace their  covered property before the endorsement would be triggered holding it is settled that in construing an endorsement to an insurance policy the endorsement and the policy must be read together and the words of the policy remain in full force and effect except as altered by the words of the endorsement