912 F.2d 337, 342 (9th Cir.1990). Here, Diana’s description of the third male passenger was slightly more detailed than the description in Ricardo D. but, at the same time, did not match Torres insofar as Diana described the third male passenger as having some hair. Moreover, the fact that Diana did not mention a chain or cross around the passenger’s neck casts further doubt on whether Torres matched Diana’s general description. Accordingly, Diana’s description alone was clearly insufficient to create probable cause as a matter of law. Second, a reasonable jury could have found that Diana’s “identification” of Torres in the six-pack did not create probable cause because the six-pack was suggestive and the “identification” was not sufficiently reliable. See Grant, 315 F.3d at 1086-88 (<HOLDING>). The Supreme Court has cautioned that “[a]
holding invalid warrant did not create probable cause for arrest holding that two identifications did not create probable cause as a matter of law because sixpack was arguably suggestive and identifications lacked sufficient indicia of reliability holding that merely traveling with drug dealers did not create probable cause at time of defendants arrest holding under new york law that a grand jury indictment does not create a presumption of probable cause for false arrest claims holding that there is no  1983 cause of action for false arrest unless the arresting officer lacked probable cause