2004) (quoting Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp., 991 P.2d 757, 761 (Alaska 1999)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 21 . In re Hutchinson's Estate, 577 P.2d 1074, 1075 (Alaska 1978). 22 . Id. 23 . Allen v. Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Comm'n, 147 P.3d 664, 668 (Alaska 2006). 24 . AS 23.30.045(f)(2). 25 . AS 23.30.045(f)(1). 26 . Nelson does not appear to contest that the Municipality engaged the services of a contractor in the course of its business and enjoyed the beneficial use of the contractor's work. 27 . In the trial court, Nelson focused his arguments on a facial challenge to the constitutionality of the 2004 project owner amendments. Our opinion in Schiel v. Union Oil Co. of Cal. foreclosed those arguments in Nelson's case. See 219 P.3d 1025, 1029-37 (Alaska 2009) (<HOLDING>). 28 . See State v. Am. Civil Liberties Union
holding that doctrine does not violate equal protection holding transfer rule did not violate federal equal protection holding that the admission of his juvenile conviction did not violate equal protection holding that the cap does not violate equal protection holding that extension of exclusive liability to project owners did not violate due process or equal protection rights of injured workers