abused by father). 26 . In re Ana C., 204 Cal.App.Ath 1317, 139 Cal. Rptr.3d 686, 698 (2012) (quoting In re Karen R., 95 Cal.App.4th 84, 115 Cal.Rptr.2d 18, 22 (2001)). 27 . AS 47.10.011(7). 28 . Because we are remanding the case for further proceedings and retaining jurisdiction, we do not now address Risa's challenge to the trial court's findings about the children being in need of aid due to her mental illness. We likewise do not now evaluate Rowan's arguments about the adequacy of the evidence to support findings under other statutory subsections. See Martha S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 268 P.3d 1066, 1080 (Alaska 2012) (citing Jon S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 212 P.3d 756, 762 (Alaska 2009))
holding that to find negligence jury need not find violation of federal motorcarrier regulation holding that ocs is not required to wait to intervene until a child has suffered actual harm before requesting a finding that a child is in need of aid holding that a superior court can adjudicate a child as a child in need of aid based on the acts of just one parent holding that a plaintiff is not required to state the statutory or constitutional basis for his claim only the facts underlying it holding that only one statutory basis is required to find a child in need of aid