338, 361 (6th Cir.2015) (concluding that, based on letter from the child’s doctor, a reasonable fact-finder could find an accommodation of a miniature horse necessary to alleviate a child’s disabilities); Bhogaita v. Altamonte Heights Condo. Ass’n, Inc., 765 F.3d 1277, 1289 (11th Cir.2014) (concluding based on a letter from- complainant’s doctor that a reasonable factfinder could conclude that the complainant’s dog alleviates the symptoms of his post-traumatic stress disorder); Castellano v. Access Premier Realty, Inc., No. 1:15-CV-0407-MCE-KJS, 2016 WL 1588430, at *6 (E.D.Cal. Apr. 20, 2016) (concluding that the complainant’s cat was necessary to alleviate the complainant’s mental and physical ailments, based on a letter from the complainant’s physician); Smith, 2013 WL 5786586, at *6 (<HOLDING>); The Sec’y, United States Dep’t of Hous. &
holding that evidence of impaired mental functioning is inherently mitigating and that a defendant is not required to demonstrate a nexus between his mental capacity and the crime committed holding that a letter from the complainants psychiatrist established a nexus between the complainants mental disability and a comfort dog holding that the plaintiff carries the burden of showing that after he was rejected for a promotion the position remained open and the employer continued to seek applicants from persons of complainants qualifications  emphasis added holding that the puc may not allocate the amount of a disputed water bill between the utility and the customer where the complainants had not met their burden of proof holding that no federal nexus is required