parties, only the trier of fact can determine whether plaintiff was indeed a shareholder of KPC. However, KPC argues that even if plaintiff is a shareholder, plaintiff, as a matter of law, is not entitled to a judgment in her favor because her claim is barred by the statute of limitations or waived by laches. Because the trial court’s grant of summary judgment will be affirmed if it is sustainable on any theory, and the trial court did not make findings of fact or conclusions of law, we must address whether plaintiffs claim was barred as a matter of law. See Chase Resorts, Inc. v. Safety Mut. Cas. Corp., 869 S.W.2d 145, 148 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). Section 516.120 provides that the statute of limitations for actions for liabilities created by statute is five (5) years. .W. 94, 98-99 (1924)(<HOLDING>). Specifically, KPC argues plaintiffs cause of
holding minority shareholders to be forced sellers for the purpose of 10b because corporation forced shareholders to sell their shares for cash or else realize no value from the stock holding that after the sale of stock former shareholders have no standing to file a claim against the corporation holding that derivative actions do not require the support of a majority of shareholders or even all of the minority shareholders recognizing privilege for corporate officers directors and shareholders to influence the actions of their corporation holding a shareholders cause of action accrued for statute of limitations purposes when shareholders and directors of a company asserted a right to stock which was hostile to the plaintiffs claim to the stock