rather than from the date of the insured’s injury. See Traveler’s Indem. Co. v. Ingebretsen, 38 Cal.App.3d 858, 862-63 & n. 4, 870, 113 Cal.Rptr. 679 (Cal.Ct.App.1974); Neitlich v. Amica Mut. Ins. Co., 7 Mass.App.Ct. 661, 389 N.E.2d 1017, 1019 (1979); Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co., 17 Tex.Civ.App. 498, 44 S.W. 533, 533-35 (1897); see also John Alan Appleman & Jean Appleman, Insurance Law & Practice § 4103, at 389 (1972) (“An insurer recovering from a third party wrongdoer has been held to be entitled to interest upon the amount of the loss paid from the time of'payment.” (emphasis added)). National Insurance paid for the property damage to the cigars caused by Yellow Freight. It does not appear that it paid for Tabacalera’s loss of its use of 55 (Fed.Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Nevertheless, noting that “ ‘[p]rejudgment
holding that prejudgment interest may inelude compound interest holding that district court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest at the colorado statutory rate of 8 percent holding that prejudgment interest may include compound interest holding in patent litigation that district court did not abuse its discretion by awarding simple rather than compound prejudgment interest holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in awarding prejudgment interest on attorneys fees paid prior to the entry of judgment