order terminating her parental rights. In two po 10-06-00037CV, 2006 WL 1642105, at *2 & n. 2 (Tex.App.-Waco June 16, 2006, no pet. h.) (Vance, J., concurring) (referring to and quoting the House Comm. On Juvenile Justice and Family Issues, Bill Analysis, Tex. H.B. 409, 79th Leg., R.S. (2005)). 3 . Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 263.405(f) (Vernon Supp.2005). 4 . D.S., 176 S.W.3d at 876 (examining the enacting legislation of section 263.405(f)). 5 . Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 107.013 (Vernon Supp. 2005). 6 . In re M.S., 115 S.W.3d 534, 544 (Tex.2003). 7 . In re K.L., 91 S.W.3d 1, 13 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2002, no pet.). 8 . M.S., 115 S.W.3d at 546 (footnote omitted). 9 . See Tex Code Crim. Proc. Ann. arts. 11.07, 11.071 (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469, 475 (Tex.Crim.App.1997) (<HOLDING>). 10 . See Tex. Fam.Code Ann § 161.211 (Vernon
holding on appeal from a habeas corpus denial that counsel was not ineffective for failure to file a notice of appeal because of defendants escape holding that defendant may raise claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal only if ineffective assistance is conclusive from the record holding that defendants claim for ineffective assistance of counsel due to a conflict of interest was not cognizable on direct appeal recognizing that there is a preference for habeas corpus proceedings over remand when the record on appeal does not establish a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel holding that rejection of ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal does not bar relitigation of it on habeas corpus to the ex tent that applicant seeks to gather and introduce additional evidence