to the revised section 1441 unequivocally states: Congress kept the diversity jurisdiction and kept § 1441(c) as well, but made it inapplicable in diversity cases. Under the amendment, a removal under § 1441(e) is henceforth permitted only. in a federal question case, i.e., a case in which jurisdiction of the claim that furnishes the removal basis is one that arises under federal law. ‡ ¡K ‡ ‡ Whatever the reason for the 1990 amendment, the diversity case may no longer invoke removal under subdivision (c); only the federal question claim — a claim arising under federal law — will henceforth support a subdivision (c) removal. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441, Commentary on 1990 Revision (West Supp.1993). See 14A Charles A. Wright, et al, Federal Practice and Procedure § 3724 (Supp.1993) at 99-100 (<HOLDING>). Further, there is an alternative basis to
recognizing that  1441c limits removal to situations in which a federal question is joined with a separate and independent claim of a nonfederal nature holding that a party fraudulently joined to defeat removal need not join in removal petition holding that removal under section 1441c may only be done by the original defendant holding that  1441c does not allow the remand of claims that are not separate and independent holding that joinder of a nonremovable jones act claim with a removable claim under general maritime law that is not separate and independent is not grounds for removal