plan approval within 180 days, which the Debtor did. There is no ambiguity in the Plan about this, and the confirmed Plan must be applied and enforced as written. What the City really is seeking, in effect, is a modification of the confirmed Plan, to put in some unspecified deadlines, time limits, or milestones that are not there. But under Bankruptcy Code § 1127(b), only the Debtor may propose a post-confirmation plan modification. See 11 U.S.C. § 1127(b) (“The proponent of a plan or the reorganized debtor may modify such plan at any time after confirmation of such plan and before substantial consummation of such plan, ....); In re Longardner & Assocs., Inc., 855 F.2d 455, 462 n.8 (7th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1015, 109 S.Ct. 1130, 103 L.Ed.2d 191 (1989) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>) For these reasons, the Court concludes that
holding that claims raised in later litigation were barred because they could have been fully litigated in chapter 11 reorganization process holding that remedies provided in the bankruptcy code for enforcing a chapter 11 plan of reorganization are not exclusive holding that interest on postpetition taxes incurred by the debtor during chapter 11 reorganization is an administrative expense holding based on  1127b that only the proponent  of a chapter 11 reorganization plan can seek to have it modified holding that a confirmed chapter 13 plan is binding on all parties under 11 usc  1327a however the plan may be modified pursuant to 11 usc  1329