S.W.2d 681 (Ark.1980). Under this record and based upon the jury findings, I would affirm and reform the judgment to $410,830 being the damages occasioned by the failure to pay. Since the majority holds otherwise, I respectfully dissent. 1 . The majority also says: “We defer all changes in this common law rule to our Texas Supreme Court.” (citing Hancock v. Express One International, Inc., 800 S.W.2d 634 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990, writ requested)). This court has not relied upon that maxim to avoid its responsibility in the past. See e.g. Hauck v. Sabine Pilots Service, Inc., 672 S.W.2d 322 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1984), aff'd, 687 S.W.2d 733 (Tex.1985) (creating an exception to at will termination); Tidelands Automobile Club v. Walters, 699 S.W.2d 939 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1985, writ refd n.r.e.) (<HOLDING>); Garrard v. St. Elizabeth Hosp., 708 S.W.2d
holding that under south dakota law compensation for negligent infliction of emotional distress requires manifestation of physical symptoms and intentional infliction of emotional distress requires an extreme disabling emotional response recognizing that the indiana tort claims act grants broad immunity to governmental employees from suit for malicious prosecution and intentional infliction of emotional distress recognizing the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress recognizing the tort of intentional infliction of emotion distress for the first time in indiana holding parental child abduction compensable under intentional infliction of emotional distress