CURIAM. In this appeal from a final judgment of dissolution, we affirm without comment as to all issues except the requirement that the former husband maintain life insurance to secure his support obligations. The trial court orally pronounced this requirement, but it was not included in the written judgment as the law requires. See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 151 So.3d 27, 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (<HOLDING>). Therefore, we reverse and remand for the
holding that in cases of direct conflict between a courts oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment the oral pronouncement controls holding that written judgment controlled over oral pronouncement holding that a trial courts changing of the written sentence to conform with the oral pronouncement of sentence is ministerial holding that the failure of a written sentence to conform to the courts oral pronouncement cannot be raised in a rule 3800a motion holding written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement