seeking a preliminary injunction must show the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be adequately compensated by damages. Shoe Show. Consultants argue there is no threat of immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be compensated by money damages because OPFM is defunct, no Wrap Mortgages are being sold, and the pecuniary damages Consumers sustained are already fixed. See W. Penn Specialty MSO, Inc. v. Nolan, 737 A.2d 295 (Pa.Super.1999) (an injury is regarded as “irreparable” if it will cause damages that can be estimated only by conjecture and not by an accurate pecuniary standard). As noted, the Commonwealth asserts a violation of statutory law constitutes irreparable injury. See Pub. Util. Comm'n v. Israel, 356 Pa. 400, 52 A.2d 317 (1947) (<HOLDING>). In particular, where the Commonwealth cred
holding that a determination of irreparable harm is unnecessary where the legislature prohibited certain conduct holding that the district court erred when it failed to consider the presumption of irreparable harm holding the time trouble and expense of an unnecessary trial is not irreparable harm when determining whether the threshold elements of certiorari jurisdiction have been met holding that a party who can show a significant risk of irreparable harm has demonstrated that the harm is not speculative holding that the threat of irreparable harm must be immediate