with the Nissan related to criminal conduct was not supported by any articulable facts. The Nissan’s attempt to leave the bank when the officers arrived does not tip the scale in favor of finding reasonable suspicion because the testimony indicates that the Nissan simply began to back out of a parking space. Cf. Hill, 51 So.3d at 651 (declining to find reasonable suspicion of criminal activity based on a vehicle’s driving away from the scene in an “unremarkable fashion”). When all of the circumstances are considered, any suspicion that the people in the Nissan were improperly influencing the bank customer to withdraw money or were otherwise involved in a crime is highly speculative and properly characterized as a hunch. Cf. Cooks v. State, 28 So.3d 147, 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) (<HOLDING>); Hall v. State, 366 So.2d 865, 865 (Fla. 4th
holding that reasonable suspicion existed where suspect described location of his vehicle over phone to undercover officer holding that officers lacked reasonable suspicion to detain a vehicle described in a 911 call where a hotel clerk reported that she felt unsafe as a result of an attempt by one of the vehicles occupants to open the door to the establishment after being asked to leave holding that police officers lacked reasonable suspicion to support the investigatory stop of the defendants vehicle which was based only on a 911 hangup call from a residence in a culdesac and the fact that an officer saw the defendants vehicle turn off the culdesac four minutes later holding that officers may detain the occupants of a house while executing a search warrant holding that officers may detain the occupants of a vehicle while executing a search warrant