that need replacement and two bad knees. [She] also suffers from congestive heart failure. [She] also lives alone.” The trial court stated in its decision that its “job is to determine under the appropriate statute whether or not it is more likely than not that abuse or exploitation of an elderly person has occurred.” (Emphasis added.) It then concluded that abuse could be defined in numerous ways, that the plaintiff was injured by defendant, and that an order would issue ¶ 3. Although we do not require extensive findings for relief from abuse proceedings, the trial court erred when it made no factual findings on the evidentiary issues and no findings on the jurisdictional issue of whether plaintiff was a vulnerable adult. Begins v. Begins, 168 Vt. 298, 301, 721 A.2d 469, 471 (1998) (<HOLDING>). The trial court appears to have looked at the
holding that the trial courts factual findings related to alimony will be upheld on appeal if supported by   any evidence   holding that a reviewing court has the power to reject the findings and conclusions of the trial court where the findings are not supported by the evidence holding that family courts conclusions will not be set aside if supported by findings holding it is proper to defer to the family court even if conflicting evidence is presented on appeal as long as ample evidence in the record supports the family courts findings and conclusions holding that this court will only set aside district courts factual findings when they are clearly erroneous