immediately after the shooting, Marrero made a telephone call from his cellular telephone. He then refused to assist the police in gathering information about the perpetrators. This testimony corroborated other evidence that the Santiago organization was engaged in a "drug war" with a rival gang. 3 . The rule provides in pertinent part: [T]he defendant may, in order to afford an opportunity to move to suppress evidence request notice of the government's intention to use (in its evidence in chief at trial) any evidence which the defendant may be entitled to discover under Rule 16.... 4 . Indeed, the district court noted specially that a variety of factors, such as the unavailability of witnesses and sloppy prosecutorial work at the local level, may well have contributed to t Cir.1963) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, since none of the alternates
holding that rule 24c violations not brought to the district courts attention are forfeited holding that district courts do not have appellate jurisdiction over state courts holding that federal district courts have jurisdiction over violations of collective bargaining contracts even if such violations are also unfair labor practices subject to nlrb jurisdiction holding that a district courts findings under rule 52a are to be liberally construed in support of the district courts judgment recognizing that in the interest of judicial economy res judicata may properly be raised by a district court sua sponte particularly where both actions are brought in the courts of the same district