there are rental properties located within the land enclosed by the fence and gate. Myrick and his brother actually rented a space behind the convenience store. 5 . A person does not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in something he voluntarily exposes" to the public. Martinez v. State, 880 S.W.2d 72, 76 (Tex.App.-Texarkana 1994, no pet.). "What a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection.” Id. (citing Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347, 351, 88 S.Ct. 507, 19 L.Ed.2d 576 (1967)). 6 . See Wade v. State, No. 02-02-241-CR, 2004 WL 1416111, at *4 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth, Jun. 24, 2004, pet. ref'd) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing United States v. Silva, 247 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir.2000) (<HOLDING>); United States v. Baron-Mantilla, 743 F.2d
holding defendant who was employee of and had key to his fathers business  premises searched  lacked standing to challenge search of building his father owned holding that passengers lacked any reasonable expectation of privacy and therefore had no standing to challenge the search of the vehicle holding that federal agents had probable cause to search defendants truck for drugs and contraband even though defendants conduct was consistent with innocent behavior holding based on totality of circumstances defendants had no standing to challenge search of shed in which methamphetamine was being produced even though defendants claimed to have stayed in shed during previous night and possessed key to shed holding that a search warrant authorizing the search of premises located at a certain address authorized the search of the entire curtilage including a shed located about 20 feet behind the defendants house even though the shed was not specifically described