liable for the conduct of another person if the person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of an offense. He references Arkansas Code Annotated section 5-2-403(a) (Repl.2006), which defines “accomplice” as follows: (a) A person is an accomplice of another person in the commission of an offense if, with the purpose of promoting or facilitating the commission of an offense, the person: |fi(l) Solicits, advises, encourages, or coerces the other person to commit the offense; (2) Aids, agrees to aid, or attempts to aid the other person in planning or committing the offense; or (3) Having a legal duty to prevent the commission of the offense, fails to make a proper effort to prevent the commission of the offense. See also Navarro v. State, 371 Ark. 179, 264 S.W.3d 530 (2007) (<HOLDING>). Appellant submits that in order for him to be
holding that counsel did not admit the defendant was guilty of a crime when counsel noted that if the evidence established the commission of any crime that crime was voluntary manslaughter not murder holding that when two people assist one another in the commission of a crime each is an accomplice and criminally liable for the conduct of both holding communication to two people not actionable holding that an indictment charging one offense during the commission of another crime need not allege the elements of the latter offense holding that sale of two obscene magazines to one detective in one transaction and sale of two obscene films to another detective in another transaction could result in only one conviction for each separate transaction