conclusion, the Court posited: Regardless of knowledge, a tenant who ‘cannot control drug crime, or other criminal activities by a household member which threaten [the] health or safety of other residents, is a threat to other residents and the project.’ With drugs leading to ‘murders, muggings, and other forms of violence against tenants,’ and to the ‘deterioration of the physical environment that requires substantial government expenditures,’ it was reasonable for Congress to permit no-fault evictions in order to ‘provide public and other federally assisted low-income housing that is decent, safe, and free from illegal drugs[.]’ Id. at 134, 122 S.Ct. 1230 (internal citations omitted); see also Powell v. Housing Authority of the City of Pittsburgh, 571 Pa. 552, 812 A.2d 1201 (2002) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 15 Congress, in enacting section 1437d,
holding that it was appropriate for the trial court to find that lack of a prior criminal record was not a mitigating factor in light of the violent nature of the crime committed holding that for recovery under the mississippi tort claims act to be barred because of a victims criminal activity at the time of the injury it must beshown that the criminal activity has some causal nexus to the wrongdoing of the tortfeasor holding that a public housing authority may terminate benefits conferred by section 8 of the united states housing act of 1937 42 usc  1437f for the violent criminal activity of a family member without having to prove that the violent criminal activity threatens the health safety or right to peaceful enjoyment of the premises by other residents holding that the illinois crime of failure to report for imprisonment is not a violent felony for purposes of the armed career criminal act holding that g l c 127  133 established two classifications of criminal activity  violent and nonviolent  with respect to parole eligibility