circumstantial evidence to raise a reasonable inference of intentional discrimination. See Hamilton, 680 F.3d at 1320; see also Smith, 644 F.3d at 1328 (“[T]he plaintiffs failure to produce a comparator does not necessarily doom [her] case.”). Here, the record contains enough non-comparator evidence for a jury to reasonably infer that Defendant discriminated against Plaintiff because she was pregnant. See Chapter 7 Trustee v. Gate Gourmet, Inc., 683 F.3d 1249, 1256 (11th Cir.2012). á) Discriminatory Comments The discriminatory comments of Ms. Thistlethwaite are strong circumstantial evidence of a discriminatory intent. A plaintiff can demonstrate a dis criminatory animus of a decisionmaker by showing that the decisionmaker made discriminatory remarks. See Damon, 196 F.3d at 1362 (<HOLDING>). A discriminatory statement can be probative
holding that a plaintiff would have to show that he was not promoted because of his race not that he was a member of a protected group and was not promoted holding that supervisors statement that he wanted aggressive young men like himself to be promoted was highly suggestive circumstantial evidence of discriminatory animus holding that evidence which suggests but does not prove a discriminatory motive is circumstantial evidence by definition holding that circumstantial evidence alone may establish discriminatory intent holding that employers statement was not direct evidence where accepting statement as evidence of age animus depended on an inference