the showing of prohibitive expense must be before the party seeking arbitration must come forward with contrary evidence.” Randolph, 531 U.S. at 92, 121 S.Ct. 513. But, the Court has made it clear that the party “seeking] to invalidate an arbitration agreement on the ground that arbitration would be prohibitively expensive ... bears the burden of showing the likelihood of incurring such costs.” Id. And, the mere risk that a plaintiff “will be saddled with prohibitive costs is too speculative to justify invalidating an arbitration clause.” Id. at 91, 121 S.Ct. 513. Here, plaintiffs have failed to provide the requisite information to support a determination that the fees and costs associated with arbitrati , No. 15 Civ. 8410 (ER), 2016 WL 5339552, at *8-9 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 22, 2016) (<HOLDING>); Leonard v. Del. N. Cos. Sport Serv., Inc.,
holding that plaintiffs failed to meet their burden to show that the arbitration agreement prevented them from vindicating their statutory rights because they did not file affidavits or assert in their briefs that the costs were prohibitively expensive instead plaintiffs provided only the barest assertions that the fees and costs clause  makes the arbitration provision unconscionable holding that plaintiff failed to carry his burden to show that arbitration was cost prohibitive because he has provided no evidence of the specific costs or arbitration fees or his financial inability to afford  them holding that plaintiffs had not satisfied their burden to show that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because plaintiffs claims of prohibitive costs were too speculative holding that where the arbitration agreement was silent on feesplitting and the costs imposed upon the plaintiff by the aaa were not prohibitive the plaintiff had presented little evidence to indicate that arbitration would be prohibitively expensive and the fees and costs of arbitration did not render the arbitration scheme unconscionable holding the party seeking to invalidate an arbitration agreement because of prohibitive arbitration fees bears the burden of proof and the possibility of such party incurring prohibitive costs is too speculative to invalidate an arbitration agreement where the record reveals only that the agreement is silent on the subject of arbitration costs