A careful review of the record indicates that all of the features that led the Supreme Court to uphold the investigative detention at issue in Butler are present in this case as well. At bottom, Defendant voluntarily entered a drug-ridden area, comparable to the one in which Officer Hedges found the defendant in Butler. While in the area, two individuals approached Defendant’s car and inserted their hands into the interior of the vehicle. After Officer Pritchard became suspicious and approached Defendant and the two pedestrians, the two pedestrians fled and Defendant began to drive off. In the same manner, the defendant in Butler attempted to walk away after making eye contact with Officer Hedges. Under the analysis adopted by the Supreme Court in Butler, t 2 S.E.2d 538, 540-41 (1995) (<HOLDING>). Thus, since the Supreme Court’s decision in
holding that an officers reasonable belief that he had witnessed a handtohand drug transaction helped provide a reasonable suspicion to make an investigatory stop of defendants vehicle holding that a tip may provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify an investigatory stop holding that flight from police can help establish reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention