Named Agents of Fed. Narcotics Bureau, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 20 . Id. at 396-99, 91 S.Ct. at 2004-06. 21 . 103 S.Ct. at 2411-12. 22 . Id. at 2416-17. 23 . Stephens v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Serv., 901 F.2d 1571 (11th Cir.), cert denied, -U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 555, 112 L.Ed.2d 562 (1990); Feit v. Ward, 886 F.2d 848, 854-56 (7th Cir.1989); Hill v. Department of Air Force, 884 F.2d 1318, 1320-21 (10th Cir.1989); Kotarski v. Cooper, 866 F.2d 311 (9th Cir.1989); McIntosh v. Turner, 861 F.2d 524 (8th Cir.1988); Spagnola v. Mathis, 859 F.2d 223, 228 (D.C.Cir.1988); Braun v. United States, 707 F.2d 922, 926 (6th Cir.1983). 24 . Cf. Palmero v. Rorex, 806 F.2d 1266, 1270-71 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 819, 108 S.Ct. 77, 98 L.Ed.2d 40 (1987) (<HOLDING>). See generally Gleason v. Malcom, 718 F.2d
holding that a federal employee cannot bring a civil action placing only the allegedly insufficient administrative remedy at issuethe employee must also place the finding of discrimination at issue holding that federal employee cannot file for damages against supervisor for an unconstitutional adverse personnel action when congress has provided adequate administrative remedy holding that due to the csra a federal employee has no independent right of action for damages against a supervisor who improperly disciplined the employee for exercising his first amendment rights recognizing that the cmpa provides the exclusive remedy for a common law action  if the employee claims wrongful treatment or injury cognizable as a personnel issue under the acts performance ratings adverse actions and employee grievance provisions holding that a federal cause of action for damages arises upon a federal agents unconstitutional conduct