Red Sox” while the Bon Jovi song is about a town and “without the video, there would be no connection to baseball.” In an effort to show lyrical similarity, plaintiff relies on “reports” from Jonathan Yasuda (“the Yasuda Report”), a law student with an undergraduate degree in music, and Mark Ferraguto (“the Ferraguto Report”), a musicology Ph.D. candidate. Both reports identify purported similari ties between the structure and rhyme scheme of the Steele Song and the Bon Jovi Song. Even assuming those individuals are qualified to render opinions on the subject, their conclusions do not create a genuine issue of material fact concerning substantial similarity. A common rhyme scheme or structure does not qualify as original expression protectable under federal copyright law. See id. at 23 (<HOLDING>). Furthermore, considered as a whole,
holding that pennsylvanias full judicial review of a denied building permit is adequate process holding that a particular harmonic progression is a stereotypical building block of musical composition which lacks originality holding that agreement to buy property as is in which buyer included voluntary freely negotiated affirmation that he was depending on his own assessment of the building precluded claim for damages when building was found to contain asbestos holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to review claims that have not been raised before the bia holding that state law claims cannot pend from a federal one over which the district court lacks subject matter jurisdiction