and without authorization fraudulently uses, or possesses with intent to fraudulently use, personal identification information concerning an individual without first obtaining that individual’s consent, commits the offense of fraudulent use of personal identification information .... (Emphasis added.) Accordingly, fraudulent use of personal identification information includes the following elements: (1) willfully and fraudulently using or possessing with intent to fraudulently use; (2) another person’s personal identification information; ... (3) without that person’s authorization or prior consent. Sibley v. State, 955 So.2d 1222, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) (emphasis added) (citing § 817.568(2)(a), Fla. Stat (2003)); accord Williams v. State, 57 So.3d 904, 905 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) (<HOLDING>); Townshend v. State, 965 So.2d 236, 237 (Fla.
holding that defense that victim consented to defendants use of personal identification information if proven would render state unable to establish every element of the crime holding that reliance is not an element to be proven under securities fraud in indiana holding that postapprendi drug quantity is an element of the offense to be proven to jury holding that conviction of a crime requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt of every fact necessary to constitute the crime holding that reasonable reliance is not an element of the defense