Regulation B to provide: Applicant means any person who requests or who has received an extension of credit from a creditor, and includes any person who is or may become contractually liable regarding an extension of credit. For purposes of § 202.7(d), the term includes guarantors, sureties, endorsers, and similar parties. 12 C.F.R. § 202.2(e) (emphasis added). Originally, Regul rantor expressly falls within the meaning of “applicant” and therefore can assert an ECOA violation. 12 C.F.R. § 202.2(e); see also F.D.I.C. v. Medmark, Inc., 897 F.Supp. 511, 514 (D.Kan.1995) (stating “[t]he term ‘applicant’ encompasses any person who is or may become contractually liable regarding an extension of credit, including guarantors”); Pfeiff, 809 P.2d at 1102-03 (same); Lincoln, 433 N.W.2d at 712-13 (<HOLDING>). In this case, Christine’s and Phyllis’s
holding because legislature knew how to include terms within statutory definition and did not do so statutory definition did not include terms in light of the terms contemporaneous inclusion of the same terms in a separate provision recognizing regulation bs definition of applicant was amended so as to include guarantors recognizing that the copyright act was amended in 1976 to include computer programs in the definition of protectable literary works recognizing that whitehead was decided before section 775084 was amended so that once the defendant meets the definition of a habitual felony offender the trial court is no longer required to provide written reasons for imposing a sentence in excess of the guidelines holding that the challenge to a university regulation was moot because the regulation had been substantially amended