and her ability to engage in it without detection, were facilitated by her ability to engage in the necessary transactions without supervisory approval. Her position provided her with the freedom to commit her difficult-to-detect embezzlement activities. Accordingly, the district court properly increased Me-drano’s sentence two offense levels pursuant to § 3B1.3 of the Sentencing Guidelines. AFFIRMED. 1 . The first federal victims’ rights legislation was the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA). Congress amended and expanded the VWPA with the passage of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984, the Victims Rights and Restitution Act of 1990, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, the Antiterrorism, and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 and (2nd Cir.1998)
holding a single vulnerable victim is sufficient to support application of the vulnerable victim enhancement holding vulnerable victim factor sufficiently supported by evidence that victim was 82 and physically unable to resist attackers holding that the defendants substantial rights were not affected by a sentencing guidelines enhancement even in the absence of a specific finding by the district court because the evidence amply supported the enhancement holding that the district court lacked authority to revisit the application of the career offender enhancement in a  3582 motion because that enhancement was not affected by a retroactive amendment holding bank customers affected by embezzlement could be victims for purposes of vulnerable victim enhancement