is properly attached to the truck’s bumper.” Id. The Second District held that “[mjatters external to the tag, such as trailer hitches, bicycle racks, handicap chairs, u-hauls, and the like are not covered by the statute.” Id. at 463-64. The majority opinion concluded by looking to decisions in other states, noting that it was adopting the minority view: Although there are no cases on point in Florida, in State v. Ronau, 2002 WL 31743012 (Ohio Ct.App.2002), the court held that the trial court did not err in finding that the stop of a truck was improperly based on the fact that the trailer hitch was blocking a portion of the license plate. We recognize that Ronau appears to be the minority position. See People v. White, 93 Cal. App.4th 1022, 1026, 113 Cal.Rptr.2d 584 (Cal.Ct.App.2001) (<HOLDING>); State v. Hill, 131 N.M. 195, 34 P.3d 139, 147
holding that officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct a vehicle stop where official license and registration records reflected that the vehicle was registered to a driver with a revoked license holding that possession of a drivers license is irrelevant to the offense of failing to present a license which is completed by failing to present the license when requested to do so by an officer holding that it is permissible for an officer to order the occupants out of a vehicle during a lawful stop holding that taillight and license plate violations justify investigatory stop of automobile holding that license plate that is partially obstructed from view by a trailer hitch violates law which provides that plates must be maintained in a condition so as to be clearly legible and such violation provided officer with a lawful basis to stop vehicle