work is primardy focused on different audiences and sometimes requires speciadzed knowledge, these employees perform the same type of community outreach and planning functions that Plaintiff does. Plaintiff also provided evidence that she and some of her alleged comparators often work together on outreach projects to reach both educational and general community audiences. Plaintiff Aff. 1f1f 20-27. Whde Defendants offered the testimony of the adeged comparators and their supervisor that Plaintiff does not perform duties simdar to theirs, Plaintiff has provided sufficient evidence to support a finding that she and the other ADO Advisors “shared the same type of tasks.” Miranda, 975 F.2d at 1529 (emphasis added); see also Moye v. Fleming Co., Inc., 924 F.Supp. 1119, 1130 (M.D.Ala. 1996) (<HOLDING>). However, Defendants have provided a
recognizing the constitutionality of at least some amount of political gerrymandering holding that convictions under  111 require at least some form of assault holding illinois wage law only applied where at least some work was performed within the state holding that plaintiff established proper comparator where the description of plaintiffs tasks and other supervisors tasks showed that although no other supervisor did exactly the same job as plaintiff she performed at least some of the same tasks and had a simdar degree of responsibility as at least some of adeged comparators holding that a hypothetical question which limited the plaintiff to simple routine tasks adequately captured the aljs conclusion that plaintiff was moderately limited in concentration persistence and pace