National Standards Institute (ANSI) in their Standard on Accessible and Useable Buildings and Facilities. The Wilkinses assert that'the trial court erred in not considering Frenzel’s affidavit as evidence that NPC was negligent in not providing on the restaurant’s premises a handicap ramp, as required by those regulations.' ¶ 10. Relying on Ball v. Dominion Ins. Co., 794 So.2d 271 (Miss.Ct.App.2001), the. trial court'granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff in Ball, a legally blind élderly woman, injured herself while attempting to step down from the curb onto the parking lot. Id. at (¶ 2). She maintained that the defendant was negligent in not providing “safety rails, cáution signs and a ramp for customers.” Id. at (¶ 3). This Cour (¶ 14) (Miss.1998) (<HOLDING>). ¶ 12. Also, Frenzel’s affidavit established
holding that safety standards regarding the safe design and use of trampolines including astm standards were admissible on the issue of the defendants negligence even though the defendants were unaware of the standards holding that the government is immune from liability for its choice of traffic protection devices holding that occupational health and safety administration osha standards were admissible holding adoption by secretary of transportation of manual on uniform traffic control devices issued under federal railroad safety act preempted state common law standards of care for grade crossings holding that manual on uniform traffic control devices mutcd standards were admissible