relative to his legitimate expectations. Failure to raise pay or grant a bonus does not ground a claim of employment discrimination without more. See, e.g., Workneh v. Pall Corp., 897 F.Supp.2d 121, 134 (E.D.N.Y.2012) (failure to extend a further spontaneous raise to employee who had received 20 raises over the course of his employment cannot ground discrimination claim on its own.) But when the expectation of a raise is legitimate because a raise is automatic in the absence of employer action, a baseless or arbitrary move to deny such a raise is a material change in the terms or conditions of employment that may give rise to an inference of discrimination. See, e.g., Fullwood v. Ass’n for the Help of Retarded, Children, Inc., 08-CV-6739 (DAB), 2010 WL 3910429 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2010) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Martires v. Connecticut Dep’t of Transp.,
recognizing that a set of actions may constitute an adverse employment action when considered collectively even though some actions do not rise to the level of an adverse employment action individually holding that denial of a bonus was not an adverse employment action holding that termination is an adverse employment action holding that although the plaintiff has suffered no adverse employment action she may still raise a claim of discrimination based on the alleged failure reasonably to accommodate her disability recognizing that denial of a raise may be adverse employment action when the raise is customary expected or warranted