of the 1999 removal order on Herrera-Castanola, and detained him. • On May 5, 2004 Herrera-Castanola filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in district court. His petition requests an order restraining removal while the petition is pending and release from custody during pendency of this lawsuit. • On June 16, 2004, the district court ruled that BICE is collaterally es-topped from claiming that HerreraCastanola is an alien. Herrera-Castanola filed a motion for summary judgment based on this ruling. • The REAL ID Act of 2005 was enacted on May 11, 2005, stripping district courts of jurisdiction to review orders of removal. • The order of reinstatement was rescinded on August 22, 2005, in light of the panel opinion in Morales-Izquierdo v. Ashcroft, 388 F.3d 1299, 1303 (9th Cir.2004) (<HOLDING>) reh’g en banc granted, 423 F.3d 1118. A notice
holding that the plaintiffs could not recover fees for postlitigation administrative proceedings before the immigration and naturalization service because the pjroceedings under the immigration and nationality act lacked the specific features of the ssa proceedings that in hudson demonstrated the intimate tie between administrative and judicial proceedings holding that all convictions remain valid for immigration purposes holding that the exclusionary rule generally does not apply to immigration proceedings holding that regulations that permitted an immigration official to reinstate removal orders violated the immigration and nationality act holding that the pendency of postconviction motion does not negate the finality of convictions for immigration removal purposes