her work environment. Also, Employee stated she “loved” her job and “enjoyed” working there and among the people for whom she worked. On these facts, no reasonably prudent person would be justified in seeking unemployment for the reasons stated above. Employee made further complaints in order to demonstrate good cause. For instance, she alleged a carrier asked her to sign a leave slip and when she refused, she received a call from a supervisor who “chewed on [her] for about ten or 15 minutes.” Apparently, the carrier used an office phone which was not allowed. At best, this can be described as a “petty irritation” which is a part of any job. See, e.g., Citizens Bank, 428 S.W.2d at 900; Backer’s Potato Chip Co. v. Labor and Indus. Relations Comm’n., 679 S.W.2d 909, 911-13 (Mo.App.1984) (<HOLDING>). Other complaints voiced by Employee were the
recognizing petitioners must be afforded the opportunity to show good cause for filing a longer petition holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause holding that claimant must show good cause for failure to submit evidence to alj and appeals council holding that the hospital failed to show how it was harmed by failure to verify the rule to show cause holding abusive and profane language by supervisor insufficient to show good cause