had obtained sufficient financing. As such, we find that the financing contingency was not illusory. IV ¶ 34. Under the terms of the contract, GEA was required, among other things, to use its best efforts 1) to ensure GEA did not dispose of its assets to a third party; and 2) to obtain the assignments of GEA's limited partners. Metropolitan alleges that GEA breached its fiduciary duty, duty of good faith, and contractual obligations. Metropolitan also asserts that GEA intentionally interfered with the contractual relationship and intentionally, or at least negligently, made material misrepresentations to Metropolitan. A ¶ 35. Parties to a contract have a duty of good faith to each other. Crown Life Ins. Co. v. LaBonte, 111 Wis. 2d 26, 44, 330 N.W.2d 201 (1983) (citation omitted) (<HOLDING>); Ekstrom v. State, 45 Wis. 2d 218, 222, 172
holding that the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing is limited to performance under a contract recognizing the basic principle of contract law that the obligation of good faith is an implied condition in every contract recognizing an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by all parties in the performance of a contract for the sale of real estate recognizing cause of action for implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in atwill employment contract holding that parties to contract have an implied obligation to put forth a good faith effort to fulfill the conditions of the contract