1189, 1195-98 (Okla.1993) (<HOLDING>); Giampa v. Ill. Civil Serv. Comm’n, 89
holding a continuance of lawyer disciplinary proceedings pending resolution of related criminal proceedings is not constitutionally required recognizing that a defendants right to be heard in criminal proceedings prior to sentencing is constitutionally protected holding that probation revocation proceedings are clearly not criminal proceedings holding that the district court lacked jurisdiction to review state disciplinary proceedings against attorney holding that defendants have a right to counsel in criminal proceedings