to Bar grievance committee proceedings. In State v. Sewell, 487 S.W.2d 716, 717 (Tex.1972), the members of a local grievance committee sought mandamus to command a district judge to vacate an order that temporarily enjoined the grievance committee from concluding a hearing on matters before the committee which had been previously considered by the committee at two earlier hearings. The Supreme Court of Texas vacated the circuit court’s injunction and held that the committee’s prior decisions did not rise to the level of a final determination on the merits of the complaints before them. See id. at 718. Therefore, the matters before the grievance committee were not barred by the doctrine of res judicata. See id.; see also State v. Russell, 227 Kan. 897, 610 P.2d 1122, 1130 (1980) (<HOLDING>); Mississippi State Bar v. Young, 509 So.2d
holding that proper remedy for failure to exhaust is dismissal of the claim without prejudice holding that a review committee of the kansas board for discipline of attorneys had the authority to dismiss a complaint against an attorney with or without prejudice and when dismissal was ordered without specifying the nature of the dismissal the dismissal was without prejudice to the filing of later proceedings on the same matter holding that dismissal of a pro se complaint for failure to state a claim should generally be without prejudice but if the plaintiff has been given an opportunity amend his complaint and fails to do so the dismissal may be with prejudice holding borough could not appeal dismissal of complaint without prejudice because  dismissal without prejudice is comparable to a nonsuit under the former practice of lavf  holding that dismissal of a complaint for insufficient jurisdictional allegations should be without prejudice to amend