Word of Faith Christian Center Church. Plaintiff asks that should the court conclude that defendant has not waived the exemption defense, the court should allow additional time for discovery related to the question whether defendant in fact qualifies for the exemption, pointing out that the question whether a school qualifies for the religious exemption is a “mixed question of law and fact.” See Doe v. Abington Friends School, 480 F.3d 252 (3d Cir.2007). However, plaintiff has suggested nothing that discovery could possibly reveal which might undermine defendant’s claim that the exemption applies. Plaintiff herself has sued the Word of Faith Christian Center Church, which she alleges operates the subject daycare/preschool. See Woods v. Wills, 400 F.Supp.2d 1145, 1161-1162 (E.D.Mo.2005) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, plaintiff’s ADA claim will be
recognizing the districts duty of care for the protection of school children in its schools holding that a school district was not liable for sexual molestation of plaintiffs daughter by a teacher even though the acts occurred on school property and during school hours holding the tlo standard governs school searches when school resource officers  who although employed by the local police department are primarily responsible to the school district  are acting in conjunction with school officials holding that if a church itself operates a day care center a nursing home a private school or a diocesan school system the operations of the center home school or schools would not be subject to the requirements of the ada or this part holding that a students private school tuition should be reimbursed where parent did not unilaterally place student in private school because the school district tacitly consented to the private school attendance before proposing a different placement