consistent with this opinion. 1 . Blevins originally contracted with Morton & Furbish to rent a different cottage in Range-ley. However, after Morton & Furbish realized that they had inadvertently rented the same cottage to another individual for the same period, Morton & Furbish made a unilateral decision to substitute either the Caron cottage or another identified cottage. Blevins chose the Caron cottage. 2 . At oral argument, the parties also addressed several public policy concerns including whether, if the vacationing family overstayed the rental period, the Carons and Morton & Furbish could resort to self-help or would instead have to go through the process of forcible entry and detainer. See Sawyer v. Congress Square Hotel Co., 157 Me. 111, 115, 170 A.2d 645, 647 (1961) (<HOLDING>); 14 M.R.S. §§ 6001-6016 (2006). The parties
holding that a defendant is not entitled to relief from default judgment because notice to an attorney of filing of motions and orders is constructive notice to the client even when the client did not have actual notice holding that guest of hotel not entitled to notice of eviction holding that notice to supervisor is notice to city holding mere notice to quit followed by peaceful vacation of the premises is not sufficient to constitute a claim of constructive eviction holding that sublessee who vacated upon notice could not recover for constructive eviction in absence of showing that lessor acted in bad faith