that there are substantial contacts with Georgia on the place of performance factor. On the other hand, under the Wal- Mart/AIG COLI policies, all premium payments were not “received” and thus counted unless the payments reached the AIG headquarters in Delaware. Also, the “Renewable Level Term Insurance Rider,” Form 49827 (3/90), an integral part of the COLI policies, as evidenced by the Sims Policy, recites that it was “[s]igned for the Company at Wilmington, Delaware.” If an insurance contract specifies that premium payments are to be made at the insurance company’s home office, the general Texas rule is that the place of performance of the contract is the state in which the insurer’s home office is located. Seiders v. Merchants Life Ass’n, 93 Tex. 194, 54 S.W. 753, 754 (1900) (<HOLDING>). Accord, New York Life Ins. Co. v. Baum, 700
holding that place of performance of a life insurance contract was the state where premiums were made payable even if the contract was made in another state holding that payment made in reasonable belief that it was required by an insurance contract was involuntary holding that the place of performance governs the legality of the contract and because the contract was to be performed in mexico texas public policy against gambling was not implicated holding that for a suit to be brought in the venue in which the contract was to be performed the contract must expressly state where the performance of the contract was to occur holding that the validity of a contract for a commission for the sale of real estate is determined by the law of the state where the contract is made