Congress found L 375417, at *12 (S.D.Tex. Feb.8, 2008) ("Based on the purportedly negligent treatment of RM [who eventually died], the Court has little trouble finding Dr. Johnson’s summary suspension was appropriately based on the reasonable belief he failed to care for a patient and thus may have represented an imminent danger to the health of an individual.”); Schindler v. Marshfield Clinic, No. 05-C-705-C, 2006 WL 2944703, at *13 (W.D.Wisc. Oct. 12, 2006) (explaining that, where a surgeon "was performing surgery, a surgical instrument slipped and plaintiff's patient was rendered quadriplegic for an unspecified period of time,” and the surgeon was temporarily suspended during an investigation, the emergency provision was "satisfied”); Bakare, 469 F.Supp.2d at 282, 289 & n. 31 (<HOLDING>); Pfenninger v. Exempla, Inc., 116 F.Supp.2d
holding that the transfer restrictions of 42 usc  1395ddc apply only when an individual comes to the emergency room and after an appropriate medical screening examination the hospital determines that the individual has an emergency medical condition  holding that plaintiffs claim that medical providers did not comply with baker act was not subject to medical malpractice statutes ajlthough a medical diagnosis is necessary in order to involuntarily commit a patient the process of complying with the statute does not require medical skill or judgment holding that metlife abused its discretion by requiring the plaintiff meet an additional requirement for eligibility beyond those imposed by the plan the administrator cannot exclude a claim for lack of objective medical evidence unless the objective medical evidence standard was made clear plain and conspicuous enough in the policy to negate plaintiffs objectively reasonable expectations of coverage  holding that the emergency provision applied to a precautionary suspension that was imposed after an outside reviewer reviewed ten of the plaintiffs cases and concluded that beyond a reasonable degree of medical certainty dr bakares medical management falls below the established standards holding that there must be sufficient competent evidence from which the trier of fact could estimate the amount of damages with a reasonable degree of certainty