a separate opinion dissenting in part. 1 . A phlebotomist is a person trained in phlebotomy, which is defined as follows: "Incision into or needle puncture of a vein for the purpose of drawing blood.” This process is also known as venipuncture: "The puncture of a vein, usually to withdraw blood or inject a solution.” Stedman's Medical Dictionary (27th ed.2000). 2 . "To produce hemolysis or liberation of the hemoglobin from red blood cells.” Hemoly-sis is defined as "[a]lterati pp.3d 69, 256 Ill.Dec. 38, 751 N.E.2d 91, 96 (2001) (noting that it is essential that plaintiff present expert testimony establishing that person conducting the blood draw was negligent and the negligence caused the injury); Arbogast v. Mid-Ohio Valley Med. Corp., 214 W.Va. 356, 589 S.E.2d 498, 502-03 (2003) (<HOLDING>). 8 . Keene, 516 S.W.2d at 855. 9 . Kentucky
holding that warrantless blood draw did not violate the defendants constitutional rights and citing as only exigency the fact that alcohol in blood is quickly consumed and the evidence would be lost forever holding that permitting jury to find malpractice from blood draw without expert testimony by applying the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur instead of eliciting expert testimony as to the standard of care to be reversible error holding that sufficiency of the evidence is measured against a hypothetically correct jury charge holding expert necessary in case of negligent blood draw causing a hematoma because a jury cannot consider whether defendant acted negligently until standard against which the defendants conduct is to be measured holding that the dissipation of alcohol from a persons blood stream constitutes a sufficient exigency to justify a warrantless blood draw