and n. 19, 517 (making clear that some opportunity to raise constitutional objections is the most important consideration); S. Rep. No. 1035, supra, at 2 (under the Tax Injunction Act, a “full hearing and judicial determination of the controversy is assured. An appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States is available as in other cases”). 27 The plaintiff in Rosewell had claimed that requiring payment of the county property tax violated her equal protection and due process rights. 28 See S. Rep. 1035, supra, at 1 (state “statutes generally provide that taxpayers may contest their taxes only in refund actions after payment under protest”); H. R. Rep. No. 1503, 75th Cong., 1st Sess., 2 (1937). 29 See also Boise Artesian Hot and Cold Water Co. v. Boise City, 213 U. S. 276, 282 (1909) (<HOLDING>); Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Benedict, 229 U.
holding that the remedy in a prison conditions case must remedy actual injuries that have been identified by the court and suffered by the plaintiffs holding that the appealing party had sur rendered his claim to the equitable remedy of vacatur by settling the case and thus voluntarily forfeiting his legal remedy by the ordinary processes of appeal holding that monetary damages may be awarded in a  1132a3 claim because when sought as a remedy for breach of fiduciary duty restitution is properly regarded as an equitable remedy because the fiduciary concept is equitable holding that the illegality or unconstitutionality of a state or municipal tax or imposition is not of itself a ground for equitable relief in the courts of the united states in such a case the aggrieved party is left to his remedy at law when that remedy is as complete practicable and efficient as the remedy in equity holding that varity corp did not eliminate a private cause of action for breach of fiduciary duty when another potential remedy is available instead the district courts remedy is limited to such equitable relief as is considered appropriate