Health & Soc. Servs., 7 P.3d 946, 950 (Alaska 2000)). 6 . Id. (quoting A.B., 7 P.3d at 950). 7 . Carl N. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 102 P.3d 932, 935 (Alaska 2004) (citing Sherry R. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 74 P.3d 896, 901 (Alaska 2003)). 8 . Compare Wendell C. II v. State, OCS, 118 P.3d 1, 4 (Alaska 2005) (referring to the parents' failure to remedy their conduct in a reasonable time as a "legal conclusion") and Dennis B. v. State, Dep't of Health and Soc. Servs., DFYS, Mem. Op & J. No. 1202, 2005 WL 435173, at "7 (Alaska, Feb. 23, 2005) (stating that we review de novo "'the legal conclusion that the parents failed to remedy their conduct") with Jon S. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Office of Children's Servs., 212 P.3d 756, 763 (Alaska 2009) (<HOLDING>) and Sherry R., 74 P.3d at 903 (same). 9 . AS
holding that the district court to not clearly err in finding that a distance of 100 feet is within the curtilage holding that superior court did not clearly err in finding that the parent had not remedied the problematic conduct holding that district court did not clearly err in giving twolevel enhancement for similar conduct holding that a trial court did not clearly err in finding that an attorney fees clause materially altered a contract holding that trial court did not err