630, and are essential to preserve that right. New Jersey law in some circumstances affords greater protection of the right against self-incrimination than does federal law. For example, the Court has expanded ancillary rights in requiring readministration of Miranda warnings as a condition to continued interrogation after invocation of the right to remain silent. Hartley, supra, 103 N.J. 252, 511 A.2d 80. The right to counsel has also been the object of special judicial solicitude. See Reed, supra, 133 N.J. at 251, 627 A.2d 630 (finding under state privilege against self-incrimination that suspects undergoing custodial interrogation have additional ancillary right to be informed that counsel is attempting to reach the suspect); State v. Sanchez, 129 N.J. 261, 277, 609 A.2d 400 (1992) (<HOLDING>). Under Miranda, prior to any custodial
holding that affidavit of appellate counsel summarizing conversations with trial counsel in which trial counsel admitted making errors is hearsay and cannot establish ineffective assistance claim holding that defense counsel may decide whether to consent to voir dire proceedings before a federal magistrate holding that after indictment and before arraignment state may not institute conversations with defendants without consent of counsel holding that court may imply consent for purposes of  636c1 where  the litigant or counsel was made aware of the need for consent and the right to refuse it and still voluntarily appeared to try the case before the magistrate judge holding under state constitution that validity of consent search requires knowledge of right to refuse consent