v. State, 257 Ala. 502, 60 So.2d 202 (1952).” ’ ” Cockrell v. State, 890 So.2d 174, 180-81 (Ala.2004)(quoting Ex parte Bertram, 884 So.2d 889, 891 (Ala.2003), superseded by statute as stated in Hankins v. State, 989 So.2d 610 (Ala.Crim.App.2007)). The record shows that Holloway had more than three prior convictions in the State of Ohio for trafficking. As Judge Baschab wrote in her special writing in Williams v. State, 941 So.2d 342, 343 (Ala.Crim.App.2006) (Baschab, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part): “[T]he plain language of § 13A-12-281(a), Ala.Code 1975, indicates that the $2,000 penalty applies only if the previous conviction or convictions were for violations of the sections specifically enumerated in that statute. Compare Ex parte Bertram, 884 So.2d 889 (Ala.2003)(<HOLDING>).” Holloway’s Ohio convictions are not
holding that assault conviction for driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol and causing serious bodily injury to the person of another with the motor vehicle qualified as a crime of violence under ussg  4b12a holding that based on the plain language of  325a191 alacode 1975 a prior outofstate conviction for driving under the influence cannot be used to enhance a defendants sentence  for driving under the influence pursuant to  325a191 alacode 1975 holding that equally consistent circumstances of influence cannot be considered as evidence of undue influence holding that a felony driving under the influence conviction was not a violent felony under the acca because it differed from other crimes such as burglary explicitly listed in  924e2bii holding that driving while under the influence of intoxicants presents at the very least a serious potential risk that the driver will cause physical injury to another person