bodily injury that formed the basis of his murder conviction, our supreme court remanded the case to the trial court with instructions to reduce the robbery conviction to a Class B felony. In doing so, our supreme court ruled in part as follows: Chapman is incorrect that the robbery count should be reduced to a Class C felony. The robbery charge included the allegation that he was armed with a handgun. Because the use of a deadly weapon is not an element of the murder charge, elevation to a Class B felony is proper,. Id. at 1234 n. 3. In cases where the charges are murder and robbery, but it has not been alleged that the defendant was armed with a deadly weapon, our supreme court has reduced the robbery conviction to a Class C felony. See Logan v. State 729 N.E.2d 125, 137 (Ind.2000) (<HOLDING>). See also Kingery v. State, 659 N.E.2d 490,
holding that where a burglary conviction is elevated to a class a felony based on the same bodily injury that forms the basis of a class b robbery conviction the two cannot stand recognizing that attempted robbery with a deadly weapon is a second degree felony holding that reversal of conviction for felony murder was required where jury failed to find the defendant guilty of the underlying felony as essential element of the felony murder offense holding in part that robbery as a class b felony is not necessarily a lesserincluded offense of robbery as a class a felony holding that a defendant is guilty of the class a felony of kidnapping only if the jury finds that the evidence establishes both the class b felony of kidnapping as defined in rsa 63311 and the elements of a class a felony set forth in rsa 6331 ii