in its order ruling on appellants’ second motion for summary judgment, noted that it considered “all of the issues raised in [appellants’] Notice of Appeal [from the associate judge’s ruling]” and listed them specifically. The district court then ruled on those specific grounds, denying appellant’s second motion for summary judgment “on the issues raised on appeal,” namely, substantial truth, material falsity, and actual malice. The district court, whose ruling we are reviewing on appeal, never considered “non-actionable opinion” as a basis for summary judgment in its ruling at issue in this appeal. We therefore may not review appellant’s complaint that the district court failed to grant summary judgment on a ground not presented to it or considered by it. See Travis, 830 S.W.2d at 100 (<HOLDING>). We overrule appellants’ seventh issue. D.
holding that appellate court may only review issues actually presented to and considered by the trial court holding that issues not fairly presented to the trial court are waived holding issues not raised to and ruled upon by the trial court are not preserved for appellate review holding that an issue not presented to the trial court will not be considered on appeal holding the order is only reviewable if actually considered by the district court