would provide a windfall to them at the expense of the members of the putative class, in that Von Glasenapp is the only named Plaintiff with standing to pursue certain claims. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES the motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 337). IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 . Both parties request that the Court take judicial notice of certain documents filed in the bankruptcy action. Because these filings are "not subject to reasonable dispute” and "capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot be readily questioned,” the Court grants their requests and takes judicial notice of all filings in the docket of the bankruptcy case. See Reyn’s Pasta Bella, LLC v. Visa USA, Inc., 442 F.3d 741, 746 (9th Cir.2006) (<HOLDING>). 2 . While Movants suggest that, in Hamilton,
recognizing that a court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court  to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings recognizing that the court may take judicial notice of its own docket recognizing that a court is permitted to rely on documents incorporated into the complaint by reference and matters of which a court may take judicial notice recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice recognizing that a court may take judicial notice of court filings and other matters of public record