basis. This being so, the state could not refuse to accept religious reasons for unemployment on equal footing with secular reasons for unemployment. Or, as the Smith Court explained the holding in Sherberb and the Court’s other unemployment compensation cases, “where the State has in place a system of individual exemptions, it may not refuse to extend that system to cases of ‘religious hardship’ without compelling reason.” Smith, 494 U.S. at 884, 110 S.Ct. 1595. Smith’s “individualized exemption” exception is limited, then, to systems that are designed to make ease-by-case determinations. The exception does not apply to statutes that, although otherwise generally applicable, contain express exceptions for objectively defined categories of persons. See Swanson, 135 F.3d at 698, 701 (<HOLDING>); Hicks v. Halifax County Bd. of Educ., 93
holding that records of students evaluation by school psychologist were not subject to the psychologistpatient privilege because the student and his mother did not expect the communications to remain confidential and because the purpose of the interview was to  assess  the students need for special education services not for the purpose of treatment or counseling holding that the defendant school officials did not create the students danger or increase their risk of harm where female students were physically verbally and sexually molested by male students in a unisex bathroom and in a darkroom holding that school district policy requiring that students obtain the review and approval of school officials prior to distributing any written material violated free speech rights of students holding that a school districts policy requiring fulltime attendance by all students did not establish a system of individualized exceptions that give rise to the application of a subjective test when the exceptions to the policy were confined to strict categories of students such as fifthyear seniors and special education students holding schoolfinance system did not violate article viii by allowing taxpayers to choose whether to pay for education of nonresident students purchase average daily attendance credits or contract for the education of nonresident students