Id. Cf. United States v. Montoya de Hernandez, 473 U.S. at 535-36, 105 S.Ct. at 3307-08 (28-hour detention by border police to permit passing of some cocaine-filled balloons from person’s alimentary canal). Accordingly, we again hold that the challenged gate search initiated by Corporal Lee at Gate 1, Camp Casey, Korea, was reasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Ramsey, supra. IV Our final concern is whether appellant’s seizure was unlawful under Mil. R.Evid. 314(c) because the command policy provided too much discretion to gate guards to determine whom to stop and question. We find no express prohibition against exercising discretion in this rule. See United States v. Alleyne, supra; cf. United States v. Flowers, 26 MJ 463, 465 (CMA 1988) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, we hold that the limitation on
holding such agreements to be per se illegal recognizing that notion exercise of any discretion renders search unreasonable per se has been rejected holding that strip search incident to arrest was not per se unreasonable but holding that search was performed in an unreasonable manner when conducted in view of the public holding that such any and all language is per se unconstitutional for lack of particularity holding sixmonth delay in rendering final decision not per se unreasonable