74.351(5)(A) (Vernon Supp.2008), § 74.401(a)(4) (Vernon 2005) (defining “expert” to mean someone qualified on the basis of training or experience to offer an expert opinion). 3 . See id. § 74.351(a), (r)(6) (requiring plaintiff alleging medical malpractice claim to provide an expert report and defining "expert report” to mean a report by an expert that provides, among other things, the expert’s opinion regarding causation). 4 . See id. § 74.35l(r)(5)(C) ("'expert' means ... a physician who is otherwise qualified to render opinions on [causation] under the Texas Rules of Evidence”); Tex.R. Evid. 702 (stating that a witness may be qualified as an expert "by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education”). 5 . See Leland v. Brandal, 217 S.W.3d 60, 62-63 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006) (<HOLDING>), aff'd, 257 S.W.3d 204 (Tex.2008). 6 . See,
holding that the plaintiffs experts were not qualified to offer a medical opinion as to the cause of death because they are not physicians nor otherwise properly qualified to offer a medical opinion holding that anesthesiologists report showed he was qualified to render opinion that cessation of medicines taken by plaintiff may cause stroke but did not show his qualification to give opinion that cessation of medication did cause plaintiffs stroke holding even though experts are permitted to give an opinion they may not offer an opinion regarding the credibility of others holding that a directed verdict in defendants favor was appropriate where plaintiff s expert was able to state his opinion regarding the cause of plaintiffs injuries only in terms of possibility but not of probability recognizing that the expert was particularly qualified to give his opinion