in the next month or succeeding month, depending upon the date of the limitations period. Fisher v. Westmont Hospitality, 935 S.W.2d 222, 225 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, no pet.). The same rule applies to computing periods of limitation based on years. Id.; Pitcock, 326 S.W.2d at 566. The term “year” is defined as a calendar year. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 312.011(18) (West 1998). Thus, using the measure of a calendar year, we look to the date upon which the event occurred and then look at the calendar to find the same date, two years later, to determine the expiration of the statute of limitations. Fisher, 935 S.W.2d at 225-26. This method of calculation has been recognized by numerous courts. See, e.g., Cortinas v. Wilson, 851 S.W.2d 324, 326 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1993, no writ) (<HOLDING>); Seibert v. General Motors Corp., 853 S.W.2d
holding that a twoyear statute of limitations period applies to all  1983 actions brought in pennsylvania holding that where plaintiffs cause of action for personal injuries accrued on june 17 1989 twoyear limitations period expired on june 17 1991 holding that a compulsory counterclaim was barred by pennsylvanias twoyear statute of limitations notwithstanding that the plaintiff filed his complaint late in the twoyear limitations period holding that where conversion occurred on september 4 1935 twoyear limitation period expired on and with september 4 1937 holding that the cause of action accrued on the date of sale