F.2d 525, 528 (11th Cir.1983)). Finally, Sheppard denies responsibility for one of her accidents, the May 16, 2001 accident for which she plead nolo contendere, and does not recall any facts surrounding the fleet safe complaint incident. However, the proper inquiry is not whether the employer’s reason for an adverse employment action is correct, but rather, whether the employer reasonably believed the employee committed the infraction which led to the adverse employment action. EEOC v. Total Sys. Servs., Inc., 221 F.3d 1171 (11th Cir.2000) (affirming summary judgment when employer had a “good faith belief’ that the plaintiff employee lied in an investigation which resulted in her termination, even when the employee denied lying); Chaney v. So. Ry. Co., 847 F.2d 718, 723 (11th Cir.1988) (<HOLDING>); Allocco v. City of Coral Gables, 221
holding that because the employee had engaged in similar religious conduct on prior occasions employer had notice of the conflict holding that when an employer intentionally engages in misconduct knowing it is substantially certain to cause serious injury or death to employees and an employee is injured or killed by that misconduct the employee may pursue a civil action against his employer and also pursue benefits under the workers compensation act holding that whether an employee decides to assist the charging party or refuses to assist the  employer the employer may not retaliate against the employee because this decision of the employee constitutes participation in an investigation or proceeding under title vii holding that an employee could not establish pretext when the employer in good faith believed that the employee engaged in misconduct regardless whether the employee in fact engaged in the misconduct holding plaintiffs burden was to show that the misconduct for which she was discharged was nearly identical to that engaged in by a male employee whom her employer retained internal quotation omitted