during probation, his refusal to go through a turnaround program, and his lack of remorse. Under these circumstances, we find no error in the district court’s submission of each of these nonstatutory aggravating factors to the jury. 3. Jury Voir Dire The Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial includes the right to trial by an impartial jury. See Pruett v. Norris, 153 F.3d 579, 584 (8th Cir.1998). “Our review of whether [a] district judge conducted voir dire in a way that protected [a defendant’s] Sixth Amendment right to a fair and impartial jury is limited to an abuse of discretion.” United States v. Granados, 117 F.3d 1089, 1092 (8th Cir.1997) (citing United States v. Spaar, 748 F.2d 1249, 1253 (8th Cir.1984)). See also United States v. Blum, 65 F.3d 1436, 1442 (8th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1097, 116 S.Ct. 824,
holding that prejudice is only presumed if there is proof of an actual conflict of interest holding petitioner demonstrates actual and substantial prejudice by proving a claim under strickland holding that miscitation or omission of a statutory provision is not a basis for reversal unless the defendant demonstrates prejudice holding lack of prejudice to the defendant is not good cause holding that a district courts refusal to strike jurors for cause should only be reversed if the defendant demonstrates actual prejudice