Assembly” and “by law”. For example, section 8 of 122article 2 provides limits on criminal charges “as the General Assembly shall make cognizable.” Ark. Const. art. 2, § 8. Similarly, section 11 discusses how habeas corpus privileges may be suspended only “by the General Assembly.” Ark. Const. art. 2, § 11. As in article 2, section 7, article 2 section 10 includes the phrase “prescribed by law” in addressing the rights of defendants. Ark. Const, art. 2, § 10. The writers’ use of “prescribed by law” in some instances and “by the General Assembly” in others strongly suggests that “prescribed by law” is broader than statutory law. The variation in terms throughout article 2 cannot be considered superfluous. See Parsons v. Associated Banc-Corp., 374 Wis. 2d 513, 531, 893 N.W.2d 212 (2017) (<HOLDING>). Finally, once established that article 2,
holding that a prelitigation jury waiver was constitutional because the phrase prescribed by law in the wisconsin constitution includes judicial precedent holding that the constitutional guarantee of a right to trial by jury includes the right to a complete and correct charge of the law so that each issue of fact raised by the evidence will be submitted to the jury on proper instructions holding prelitigation waiver of jury trial must be made knowingly and voluntarily and courts will indulge in every reasonable presumption against a waiver of that right holding that with respect to the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule article 1 section 11 of the wisconsin constitution affords additional protection than that which is afforded by the fourth amendment recognizing that courts will indulge in every reasonable presumption against waiver of the constitutional right to trial by a jury