Count IV prayed for declaratory relief as to Dominion’s entitlement to reimbursement from State Farm and Johnson. Both Johnson and State Farm moved to dismiss, asserting that the statute of limitations barred Dominion’s claims. In particular, the defendants argued that Dominion was required to sue them within four years of March 1, 1993, the date of the accident. The circuit court entered judgment dismissing the action with prejudice, holding that the complaint on its face established that the statute of limitations on a subro-gation claim expired before the filing of the complaint. As an initial matter, we note that the statute of limitations did not bar the indemnification count. See Scott & Jobalia Const. Co., Inc. v. Halifax Paving, Inc., 538 So.2d 76, 79 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989) (<HOLDING>), approved, 565 So.2d 1346 (Fla. 1990); Mims
holding that fouryear limitation period on indemnification claim does not commence until the party seeking indemnification has paid a judgment or has made a voluntary payment of its legal liability to an injured party holding that indemnification  without regard to  the negligence of any party clearly and unequivocally provided bay drilling with indemnification for its own negligence holding that indemnification provision did not expressly state the party was seeking indemnity for its own negligence so as to satisfy express negligence test holding original tortfeasor had no right to indemnification because it was not an innocent party holding that where there has been no settlement or judgment of liability regarding the underlying claim any imposition of liability is not so immediate as to warrant declaratory relief on the issue of indemnification