"the circumstances in which a strip search oC an arrestee may or may not be appropriate”). 51 . Redding, 129 S.Ct. at 2649 (Thomas, J., concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part). 52 . Id., 129 S.Ct. at 2641 (requiring reasonable suspicion to justify the strip search of an adolescent student by school personnel looking for drugs). 53 . Wolfish, 441 U.S. at 559, 99 S.Ct. 1861. Although Wolfish involved the question of strip searches of inmates at detention facilities, courts have, understood the balancing test articulated by the Supreme Court to apply across the board and have utilized it to evaluate strip searches in other contexts as well, including searches incident to arrest. 54 . Id. 55 . Swain v. Spinney, 117 F.3d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1997). 56 . 2d 669, 673 (1999) (<HOLDING>). 60 . Illinois v. Wardlow, 528 U.S. 119, 123,
holding unconstitutional blanket jail policy of subjecting all arrestees to strip and visual body cavity searches holding that prison officials may conduct visual body cavity searches in a reasonable manner holding that a visual body cavity search requires probable cause and a search warrant holding probable cause to be required for strip and visual body cavity searches holding unconstitutional city policy of subjecting all females arrested and detained to strip and visual body cavity searches