Andranik Chilingaryan, a native of Azerbaijan and a citizen of Armenia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“U”) order denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). To the extent we have jurisdiction it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review adverse credibility determinations for substantial evidence, Chebchoub v. INS, 257 F.3d 1038, 1042 (9th Cir.2001), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s decision denying Chilingaryan’s asylum application as untimely. See Ramadan v. Gonzales, 427 F.8d 1218, 1222 (9th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). We also lack jurisdiction to consider
holding that because it fell within the exclusive jurisdiction of the united states court of international trade the united states court of federal claims lacked jurisdiction over a matter that was protested or protestable holding that jurisdiction was lacking to review an ijs determination that an asylum application was untimely when that determination was based on the fact that the petitioner offered no evidence other than his own testimony regarding his date of entry holding that the court lacks jurisdiction where a complaint was filed more than 30 days after the filing of the summons holding that because the ij denied an asylum application as untimely we lacked subjectmatter jurisdiction to review the final order of removal as it pertained to the asylum claim holding that the court lacks jurisdiction to review the agencys determination that an asylum application was not filed within one year after the last entry into the united states