company, Hill Country Management Service. In his affidavit, Wilson states that one of his duties is to “track[ ] assessments owed by various commercial entities within the Son-terra and Stone Oak subdivisions”; and, in the course of his duties, he calculated the amounts due and owing by each of the Owners “after all just and lawful offsets, credits and payments have been allowed.” As support, Wilson attached Exhibit SW-1, which he authenticates as one of the Association’s business records and which is a “payment history reflecting amounts owed by each of [the Owners].” Exhibit SW-1 consists of three schedules, one for each of the Owners, each entitled “Financial Transactions,” and each containing columns for “date,” “payments ip, 985 S.W.2d 477, 479 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1998, no pet.) (<HOLDING>). The Owners also argue the Association’s proof
holding that unsupported affidavits setting forth ultimate or conclusory facts and conclusions of law are insufficient to either support or defeat a motion for summary judgment holding affidavit by bank president was sufficient to support summary judgment where it established plaintiff bank owned the note and the amount due on the note and defendant failed to offer controverting evidence holding that affidavit setting forth total balance due on note is generally sufficient to sustain summary judgment and detailed proof of balance not required holding that bank employees affidavit setting forth total balance due sufficient to support summary judgment holding that unsupported affidavits setting forth ultimate or conclusoiy facts and conclusions of law are insufficient to either support or defeat a motion for summary judgment