granted: (A) for any reason for which a new trial has heretofore been granted in an action at law in federal court; (B) for any reason for which a rehearing has heretofore been granted in a suit in equity in federal court; or (C) upon the showing of satisfactory evidence, cumulative or otherwise, that any fraud, wrong, or injustice has been done to the United States. To prevail under this rule, the moving party must show that an intervening change in controlling law has occurred or that evidence not previously available has becom (2006) (denying reconsideration “[bjecause plaintiff uses the same facts on which to base his new legal theories, he could have argued these new legal theories at the summary judgment stage”); Seldovia Native Ass’n v. United States, 36 Fed.Cl. 593, 594 (1996) (<HOLDING>). Summary Judgment Standard Summary judgment is
holding that reconsideration may not be based on evidence and legal arguments that could have been presented at the time of the challenged decision holding issue raised for first time in motion for reconsideration constituted waiver holding that the district court did not err by concluding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion for continuance motion to withdraw and motion for reconsideration and rehearing holding that a motion for reconsideration should not be based on evidence that was readily available at the time the motion was heaid holding that notice of appeal did not divest the district court of jurisdiction at the time it was filed because a motion for reconsideration was pending