Corp., 514 U.S. at 308, 115 S.Ct. 1493 (quoting Pacor, Inc. v. Higgins, 743 F.2d 984, 994 (3d Cir. 1984)). 138 . Id. 139 . In re Bass, 171 F.3d at 1022. 140 . Id. at 1022-23. 141 . See Rec. Doc. 24 at 4-6. 142 . Id. 143 . See In re Enron Corp. Sec., 535 F.3d 325, 336 (5th Cir. 2008) (noting that when “related to” jurisdiction under Section 1334 “actually existed at the time of ... removal,” then subsequent events cannot divest a district court of its jurisdiction) (quotingCelotex, 124 F.3d at 626); In re Canion, 196 F.3d 579, 587 n.29 (5th Cir. 1999) ("Federal subject matter jurisdiction is tested when the jurisdiction of the federal court is invoked.”). See also Nuveen Mun. Trust ex rel. Nuveen High Yield Mun. Bond Fund v. WithumSmith Brown, P.C., 692 F.3d 283, 294 (3d Cir. 2012) (<HOLDING>) (citing Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Grp.,
holding that whether error is apparent is determined by reference to the law as of the time the appeal is decided holding that whether an action would have a conceivable effect on the bankrupt estate is determined at the time a lawsuit is filed holding that statutory good time credits must be calculated under the law in effect at the time of resentencing after an appeal of the sentence is determined holding that risk must be measured at the time the lawsuit is filed holding state of the law must be determined at time of challenged action