issued under a standard of reasonable grounds to suspect rather than probable cause. As noted earlier, the United States Supreme Court has suggested that probable cause is not required when the detention is temporary and brief, is a relatively slight intrusion into the person’s privacy, does not involve the exploration of an individual’s private life or thoughts, need not be employed repeatedly, is a reliable and effective investigative tool so as not to be subject to abuse, and need not be done unexpectedly or at an inconvenient time. See Davis, 394 U.S. at 727-28, 89 S.Ct. at 1397-98, 22 L.Ed.2d at 681. We think the compulsory presence of a citizen at the police station for swabbing of that person’s saliva is such a detention. The identification procedure is A.2d at 1244, 1246-47 (<HOLDING>); see also State v. Hall, 93 N.J. 552, 563, 461
holding detention of passenger for warrant check violated fourth amendment absent reasonable suspicion holding reasonable suspicion is based on totality of circumstances holding that prosecution of defendant in the united states for hostage taking based on acts committed outside the united states did not violate due process holding that issuance of detention order for purpose of saliva sampling based on reasonable suspicion comports with vermont and united states constitutions holding that reasonable suspicion justifies an investigatory detention