order, and such cannot Md. 12, 590 A.2d 165 (1991), the Maryland court explained as follows: [The] legislative requirement of consideration of the factors itemized in [the statute] demonstrates the intent that the utmost caution should be exercised in any decision to terminate parental rights. In cases where parental rights are terminated, it is important that each factor be addressed specifically not only to demonstrate that all factors were considered but also to provide a record for review of this drastic measure. Id. at 168. “Clear and complete findings by the trial judge are essential to enable us properly to exercise and not exceed our powers of review.” Nicpon v. Nicpon, 9 Mich. App. 373, 157 N.W.2d 464, 467 (1968); see In re Denzel A., 53 Conn.App. 827, 733 A.2d 298 (1999) (<HOLDING>). C. The Process for Disposition of Abuse and
recognizing this substantial interest in context of termination of parental rights holding that trial court mandated to consider and make written findings of fact regarding statutory factors in dispositional phase of termination of parental rights hearing holding that an issue was not properly before the court on appeal because the trial court did not have the opportunity to make any findings of fact regarding it holding remand proper on circuit courts own motion in a workers compensation case where the commission failed to make essential findings of fact because to hold otherwise would in such cases make the determination of the rights of the parties turn upon the neglect of the commission to make essential findings of fact or require the appellate court to make the omitted findings of fact which our statute forbids holding in termination of parental rights case that trial court erred in taking judicial notice of evidence before him in guardianship hearing in same case