that fact, ... [a tariff classification analysis would give no consideration] to the specific tariff provisions for articles of plastics, articles of iron and steel, articles of glass, textiles, internal combustion engines, or the other possible classifications, whether based upon materials or otherwise, in the face of a tariff provision for "motor cars and motor vehicles” in Headings 8702 and 8703, which do not include restrictions by material designation. The only question to be answered would be whether the item to be classified was a motor vehicle. Similarly, the articles before the court are "candle holders” which are articles conceded by the defendant to be a type of lamp. If 0 CIT 123, 135 (1996), aff'd in relevant part and rev’d in part, 122 F.3d 1423, 1426 n. 1 (Fed.Cir.1997) (<HOLDING>). 23 . As discussed in greater detail below,
holding wills more specific provision prevails over general provision holding eo nomine tariff provision covering vanity cases to be more specific than tariff provision covering articles of a kind normally carried in the pocket or in the handbag holding that pursuant to gri 3a relative specificity analysis htsus provision which covered merchandise when viewed as a unit is more specific than provision covering glassware of a kind used for  indoor decoration which only describes a portion of the item holding that the grant of exclusive use to one unit owner of a common area is sufficient to change the relative interest of the unit owners in that common area holding htsus provision covering ice hockey  articles and equipment to be much more specific than htsus provision which refers quite broadly to other garments of manmade fibers