that is based upon a cause of action that accrued in any other state, territory, district, or foreign jurisdiction may be commenced and maintained in this state if the period of limitation that applies to that action under the laws of that other state, territory, district, or foreign jurisdiction has expired or the period of limitation that applies to that action under the laws of this state has expired. Ohio Rev.Code § 2305.03(B). Upon review, the Court concludes that the borrowing statute does not apply to this case. The borrowing statute became effective on April 7, 2005. Sonic Auto., Inc. v. Chrysler Ins. Co., No. 1:10-cv-717, 2011 WL 4063020, at *4 (S.D.Ohio Sept. 13, 2011). This Court has consistently held that the borrowing statute does not apply retroactively. See, e.g., id. (<HOLDING>); Arandell Corp. v. Am. Elec. Power Co., Inc.,
holding that the fcia does not apply to a september 1981 judgment against the united states for interest accruing after the acts effective date holding that the fcia does not apply to a june 1981 judgment against a private party for interest accruing either after the judgment or after the effective date holding miranda decision does not apply retroactively holding that the statute does not apply retroactively to claims accruing prior to the effective date holding that apprendi does not apply retroactively