Appellant Cameron Shawayne Smith challenges his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and affirm the district court. ' The disti’ict court did not commit clear error in concluding that Smith possessed a firearm during the commission of his drug trafficking offense and applying an enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2D 1.1(b)(1), where the firearm was in his apartment where drugs were found. See United States v. Restrepo, 884 F.2d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1989); see also United States v. Lopez-Sandoval, 146 F.3d 712, 716 (9th Cir.1998) (<HOLDING>). The district court did not abuse its
holding that unloaded firearms qualify for this enhancement holding enhancement not appropriate because firearms were seized from defendants home thirtyseven days after last known drug sale occurred holding that after roper juvenile convictions can qualify as predicate offenses for sentence enhancement purposes holding negligence on the part of the attorney does not qualify for such relief holding that an attorneys negligence alone does not qualify for such relief