appeal that the residual provision of the ACCA is void for vagueness and that his previous convictions for third-degree burglary and fourth-degree aggravated assault are not violent felonies. “We review de novo a challenge to the constitutionality of a statute.” United States v. Bowers, 594 F.3d 522, 527 (6th Cir.2010). The residual clause of the ACCA, referring to a previous offense that “otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another,” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), has been held by the Supreme Court to not be unconstitutionally vague. Rather, the clause provides guidance that allows a person to conform his conduct to the law. See Sykes v. United States, — U.S. -, -, 131 S.Ct. 2267, 2277, 180 L.Ed.2d 60 -39 & n. 2 (6th Cir.2011) (<HOLDING>). The district court’s judgment is
holding that fourthdegree aggravated assault is a violent felony holding that coerced sex is violent felony holding that thirddegree burglary is a violent felony holding that burglary is violent felony holding reclassification impermissible where underlying felony of attempted thirddegree murder with a firearm was aggravated assault and aggravated assault includes the use of a deadly weapon as a necessary element