v. Dep’t of Health, Bel. of Podiatric Med., 853 So.2d 481, 483 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003). 2 . Tomlinson was out of town at the time of the incident, and it is unclear from the record whether Tomlinson asked Saunders to wait for her to arrive or to wait until another employee arrived. 3 . We note that the issues of "negligent supervision and lack of diligence are essentially ultimate findings of fact clearly within the realm of [an ALJ’s] fact-finding discretion" and which are "determinable by ordinary methods of proof, weighing the evidenced] and judging the credibility of witnesses.” See Heifetz v. Dep't of Bus. Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475, So.2d 1277, 1282 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); see also Dunham v. Highlands Cnty. Sch. Bd., 652 So.2d 894, 896 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (<HOLDING>). 4 . See also § 120.57(1)(Z), Fla. Stat.
holding that the issue of whether a party willfully neglected a duty was a simple question of fact determinable by ordinary methods of proof and it was not a question infused with policy considerations holding the question of whether insurance companys requests were reasonable under policy language was a fact question holding that generally the question of waiver and estoppel is a question of fact holding it is a question of fact holding that estoppel was a question of fact