discretionary duties at the time of the collision or that he was acting within the scope of his authority as a deputy. The sonableness of a pursuit “reqüire[s] a continuing assessment of need and risk.” Id. at 582-83. Accordingly, proof, that pursuit was reasonable at one point of chase does not establish that the entire pursuit was reasonable. See id. A police officer acts in good faith during a high-speed pursuit if “a reasonably prudent officer, under the same or similar circumstances, could have believed that the need to immediatel y judgment reflected by the doctrine of official immunity, if it is to mean anything, protects officers from suit even if they acted negligently.”); But see Junemann v. Harris Cty., 84 S.W.3d 689, 694 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, pet. denied) (<HOLDING>). If the County carries its burden of
holding failure to take action may have some bearing on good faith holding that while the creditor has the initial burden to produce some evidence of lack of good faith the ultimate burden is on the debtor to prove his good faith holding that use of plaintiffs mark is in good faith even though other aspects of defendants behavior may have evidenced bad faith holding that bad faith includes lack of good faith in investigating the facts of a complaint holding that the defendant did not establish good faith as a matter of law