to identify the caliber and manufacturer of the handgun that caused injury to a particular plaintiff.... ”). 40 . Sindell v. Abbott Labs., 26 Cal.3d 588, 163 Cal.Rptr. 132, 607 P.2d 924, 936-37 (1980) (noting that where a "plaintiff joins in the action the manufacturers of a substantial share of the [product] the injustice of shifting the burden of proof to defendants to demonstrate that they could not have made the substance which injured plaintiff is significantly diminished”). The Restatement (Third) of Torts sta .S.2d 941, 539 N.E.2d 1069 ("liability of DES producers is several only and should not be inflated when all participants in the market are not before the Court in a particular case”); Brown v. Superior Court, 44 Cal.3d 1049, 245 Cal.Rptr. 412, 751 P.2d 470, 487 (1988) (<HOLDING>); Smith v. Cutter Biological, Inc., 72 Haw.
holding that a state common law claim seeking to require automobile manufacturers to install airbags would frustrate the purposes of the federal safety standard regulations adopted under the federal motor vehicle safety act which did not require manufacturers to do so and therefore was preempted by conflict holding that evidence of admitted drug use before the birth of the children missed drug tests after removal of children and a failed drug test between removal and the final hearing established legal sufficiency of evidence to show endangerment under section 1610011e holding a fiveyear old drug conviction is probative of a defendants state of mind in a drug conspiracy case holding defendants severally liable because joint liability would frustrate sindells goal of achieving a balance between the interest of des plaintiffs and manufacturers of the drug holding that the plaintiffs liability to the defendant was absolved as a result of the bankruptcy order and the defendants were barred from collecting debts from property of the plaintiffs