quoted in several print media regarding their allegations of VSC’s w nded in 1993 to permit the Court to order “payment to the movant of some or all of the reasonable attorney’s fees” only “if imposed on motion and warranted for effective deterrence.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. Since the purpose of Rule 11 sanctions is to deter rather than compensate, the [amended] rules provides that, if a monetary sanction is imposed, it should ordinarily be paid into the court as a penalty. However, under unusual circumstances, particularly for b(l) violations, deterrence may be ineffective unless the sanction not only requires the person violating the rule to make a monetary payment, but also directs that some or all of this payment be made to those injured by the violation. McLaughlin, 1995 WL 640770 at *3 (<HOLDING>). Under the amended Rule 11, Courts in this
holding that improper motive is element of bad faith holding title company liable for bad faith holding that the district court should consider the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the patentee acted in subjective bad faith and should consider whether circumstantial evidence would support an inference of bad faith holding that evidence of counsels bad faith constituted unusual circumstances holding that a bad faith claim is a tort