the admitted fact.” Id. In- the underlying cause, the Department sought to terminate the “parent-child relationship” between F.M., Jr, and F.M., and the trial court’s order terminated that “parent-child relationship.” The term “parent-child relationship” is statutorily defined to include “the father and child relationship.” Tex. Fam. Code Ann. § 101.025 (West 2014). One of-the pleadings F.M., Jr. filed in the underlying cause was an “Affidavit of Respondents Testimony” in which F.M., Jr. refers to himself as F.M.’s father, stating he “does not deny that he is the father of son [F.M.].” This statement constitutes a judicial admission that F.M., Jr. is F.M.’s father. See In re K.P., No. 09-13-00404-CV, 2014 WL 4105067, at *13 (Tex. App.—Beaumont Aug. 21, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op.) (<HOLDING>); In re K.W., 138 S.W.3d 420, 429-30 (Tex.
holding zerodamages award inadequate because substantial undisputed and unrebutted testimony showed that deceased father had a close relationship with his children and that the children suffered a great loss as a result of their fathers death holding that the fathers statements denying responsibility for abuse on his stepdaughter were further evidence to support the trial courts conclusion that the father posed a risk of potential harm to his natural children holding fathers testimony at trial constituted an admission of paternity holding the prospective adoptive father of surrogate children did not comply with the interstate compact on the placement of children holding fathers pleadings representing himself to be the father of the children constituted a judicial admission