is taken for lawful investigative purposes: [A] deceased’s next of kin had no protected right in autopsy specimens pursuant to Ohio statutes. The Ohio Revised Code authorizes coroners to perform an autopsy when the coroner believes an autopsy is necessary. A coroner’s forensic examination is a classic function of the police power of the state. Many times, autopsy specimens and the results of the forensic examination are essential evidence in the prosecution of a crime. Sometimes, autopsy specimens must be preserved for long periods of time. Albrecht II, 889 N.E.2d at 126-27 (citation omitted) (emphasis added). Furthermore, the Ohio Supreme Court noted that its conclusion did not depend on the existence of the 2006 statute that designated autopsy specimens as medical waste. Id. at 126 (<HOLDING>). Albrecht II clearly raises a question as to
holding that parents of adult child may recover for loss of comfort and companionship of adult child where they were next of kin under wda holding that defendants contacts with ohio were deliberate and repeated even though they yielded little revenue from ohio holding no violation of ohio state voyeurism statute when the privacy interest to be protected had been waived by the females who probably expected to be observed holding that the owner of an equitable interest in property in the form of a land contract can grant a mortgage on that interest under ohio law holding that even before ohio revcode  313123b was enacted a deceaseds next of kin had no protected right in autopsy specimens pursuant to ohio statutes