OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge arguments which were previously made and were carefully considered by the court.” Id.; see also Bishop v. United States, 26 Cl.Ct. 281, 286 (1992) (<HOLDING>). To prevail on a motion for reconsideration, a
holding that the court did not have jurisdiction to consider an argument not presented to the board in a motion for reconsideration holding that a litigant must support an argument with legal authority holding that a pro se litigant who is an attorney is not entitled to fees under  1988 holding that a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant holding that reconsideration is not intended to give an unhappy litigant an additional chance to sway the court