period of absence will be terminated. Intermittent returns to work for periods of less than sixty days will not be considered a 'return to work’ and will not interrupt the running of the 1-year period." 3 . Collins failed to brief his race discrimination claim to the district court. Although that district court discussed the claim “in the interest of completeness" in its order granting summary judgment, we decline to consider it here, because we do not consider evidence or arguments that were not presented to the district court. See Nissho-Iwai Am. Corp held that an employer did not regard a plaintiff as disabled for a broad class of jobs where the employer attempted to return the plaintiff to his prior position or other positions within the same company. See Gowesky, 321 F.3d at 508 (<HOLDING>); see also Sherrod, 132 F.3d at 1121 (holding
holding that an employer did not regard the employee as disabled because it called the employee back from disability leave to work on a special project holding that an employer did not regard an employee with an impaired ankle as disabled where it encouraged her to work in a position that required walking holding that an employer did not regard the plaintiff as disabled holding that plaintiffs complaint of back pains and request for simple stands to assist with lifting made to his employer were insuffi cient to establish that the employer regarded him as disabled because he at no point indicated to the employer that he was disabled within the meaning of the ada holding that employer did not regard plaintiff as disabled where it repeatedly attempted to return him to work