801:326 (1986). When conflicts-of-interest arise between an insurance carrier and its insured, the lawyer representing the insured must act exclusively on behalf of, and in the best interests of the insured. See Connecticut Bar Ass’n Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Informal op. 83-5 (1982), reprinted in P. Allen, L. Occhino, R. Robins & R. Wells, supra, at 801:2059. “Lawyers retained by an insurance company to represent insureds must be zealous advocates for the appointed clients, even though such representation would work to the detriment of the insurance company.” New Hampshire Bar Ass’n Ethics Comm., Informal op. 1982-3/2 (1982), reprinted in P. Allen, L. Occhino, R. Robins & R. Wells, supra, at 801:5703. See also Model Code of Professional Responsibility, EC 5-23 (<HOLDING>). Intervenors have pointed to nothing that
recognizing that a lawyer hired by a third person to represent a client should exercise judgment on behalf of the client independent from the interests of the third person holding that an attorneys filing a notice of appearance on behalf of his or her client constitute a waiver of service of process by the client holding that even where a client was more sophisticated in business matters than the lawyer himself the lawyer should have assumed the client was relying on the lawyer for the legal aspects of the loan from the client to the lawyer to the same extent that the client would rely on the lawyer for advice were the client making the loan to a third person holding trial court erred when it sanctioned client where the evidence showed that the attorney filed frivolous pleadings on behalf of the client but the client did nothing more than rely on her attorneys advice holding that an attorney may only undertake to represent a new client against a former client  where there is no confidential information received from the former client that is in any way relevant to representation of the current client