filed by Hatchie Coon against Mike Campbell and Robert Hendrix,Jr., in which Hatchie Coon had also alleged that the defendants were trespassing by maintaining a duck blind on the island. 5 Hancock, Campbell, and Hendrix all filed notices of appeal but never filed appellate briefs. 6 The State abandoned several of its arguments on appeal at oral argument, including its laches argument, its argument regarding the effect of a 1919 quiet-title action, and its argument regarding tide by accretion and avulsion, and, therefore, this court need not address them. 7 The Thompson case has been cited with approval in State ex rel. O'Connor v. Sorenson, 271 N.W.234 (Iowa 1937) and 3 Am. Jur. 2d Adverse Possession § 265 (2002). See also Diana Shooting Club v. Lamoreaux, 89 N.W.880 (Wis. 1902) (<HOLDING>). 8 The circuit court found only that “the
holding that in action by property owner to recover land taken by eminent domain current titleholder to land might be necessary party if district court were to restore land to plaintiff holding that a cause of action for damages to property resulting from a permanent nuisance accrues to the owner of the land at the time the injury begins to affect the land and mere transfer of the land by deed does not transfer the claim for damages holding that land sales contracts were not securities because they involved no investment in an enterprise even if land was bought on expectation that development of the area would increase the value of the land recognizing general proposition that if land is artificially submerged for the statutory period necessary to change ownership of the land title to the submerged land is passed to the state in trust for the public holding that if respondents suit is one for permanent damages to the land the measure of damages is the decreased value of the land