Hector V. Luna appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his third amended 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint alleging false arrest, equal protection and due process violations, and several state law c -90 (9th Cir.1977) (<HOLDING>). Because Luna failed to allege facts to
holding that family courts conclusions will not be set aside if supported by findings holding a pleading will not be sufficient to state a claim under the civil rights act if the allegations are mere conclusions holding that under title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 a charge alleging a hostile work environment will not be time barred if all acts constituting the claim are part of the same unlawful practice and at least one act falls within the filing period holding that a court may not apply a heightened pleading standard more stringent than the usual pleading requirements of rule 8 in civil rights cases alleging municipal liability under  1983 holding that a court is not required to accept legal conclusions cast in the form of factual allegations if those conclusions cannot reasonably be drawn from the facts alleged