suspicious person? A No, I do not, other than Hispanic male. Officer Henderson continued his testimony during a voir dire: Q Officer, at the time you got the call about suspicious activity [sic], was any criminal activity alleged? A Not from what our dispatcher gave us, no. Q Okay. And did you, up to the point where you stopped [the juvenile], did you ever see him committing any illegal act? A No, sir. Q Okay. And you, he was walking away from you, and you asked him to stop and patted him down? A He looked in my direction and then turned and walked away. juvenile committing any criminal acts, nor had there been other reports of any criminal activity in the area that day. Cf. State v. Thompson, 296 N.C. 703, 707, 252 S.E.2d 776, 779, cert. denied, 444 U.S. 907, 62 L. Ed. 2d 143 (1979) (<HOLDING>). Although the trial court found that police
holding that where an officer threw an arrestee against a van kneed him in the back pushed his head into the side of a van and searched his groin area in an uncomfortable manner such force was de minimis force holding that officers had probable cause to search the defendants van for drugs where among other facts the defendant had voluntarily retrieved half a gram of methamphetamine from the vehicle and had acted surreptitiously in doing so holding that circumstances created reasonable suspicion for investigatory stop holding that the protective sweep of a van was lawful where officers stopped the van on reasonable suspicion that the driver had just committed an armed bank robbery and officers could not see inside the van to determine whether other occupants posed a danger to them holding circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop of occupants of a van included that the van was located near the vicinity where officers had reports earlier that evening of breakins involving a van