against me may be entered as a judgment in any court of competent jurisdiction.” (Emphasis added.) One of the organizations listed in Item 10 was the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”). The NASD “Code of Arbitration” requires brokers to arbitrate: “Any dispute, claim, or controversy ... between or among members and/or associated persons and/or certain others, arising in connection with the business of such member(s) or in connection with the activities of such associated person(s), or arising out of the employment or termination of employment of such associated person^) with such members....” (Emphasis added.) SouthTrust contends that the fraud claimed by McClellan “arises” out of his employment by SouthTrust. McClellan U.S. 220, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (<HOLDING>). Broadly construed, the term “employment”
holding that claims under the securities act of 1934 and the rico statutes are arbitrable holding wilko inapplicable to the securities exchange act of 1934 and stating in wilko the court held that a predispute agreement could not be enforced to compel arbitration of a claim arising under  122 of the securities act 15 u s c  772 emphasis supplied holding that claims under the securities act of 1933 were arbitrable under a predispute arbitration agreement holding that claims brought under section 10b of the securities exchange act and rico claims were arbitrable holding that claims under  10b of the securities exchange act of 1934 were arbitrable under a predispute arbitration agreement