there was “an unlooked for and untoward event which is not expected or designed by the [injured employee],” Gladson v. Piedmont Stores, 57 N.C. App. 579, 579, 292 S.E.2d 18, 18, disc. review denied, 306 N.C. 556, 294 S.E.2d 370 (1982), or “the interruption of the routine work and the introduction thereby of unusual conditions,” Sanderson v. Northeast Construction Co., 77 N.C. App. 117, 121, 334 S.E.2d 392, 394 (1985). The lifting of an object by an employee that is heavier than expected or heavier than the usual nature of the object may constitute an unlooked for and untoward event not expected or designed by the injured employee. Gladson, 57 N.C. App. at 580-81, 292 S.E.2d at 19; see also Calderwood v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hosp. Auth., 135 N.C. App. 112, 116, 519 S.E.2d 61, 63 (1999) (<HOLDING>), disc. review denied, 351 N.C. 351, 543 S.E.2d
holding that appellant who properly filed an objection in accordance with the notice he received from the trial court had standing to appeal holding that a woman who suffered back pain who was medically limited to light lifting and who had problems bending could make a claim holding that while the plaintiffs job responsibilities included assisting patients who received epidurals her regular work routine did not require lifting the legs of women weighing 263 pounds who had received epidurals holding that requiring plaintiff to learn new skills or the possibility she could have received training did not create an adverse change in her job responsibilities holding that the statute of limitations began to run when the plaintiff first received notice of an alleged deficiency from the irs not when he received a final determination of tax liability