damaged by a series of events, one occurrence was involved insofar as each property owner was concerned. Notwithstanding, therefore, that the same causes may have operated upon several properties at the same time resulting in varying degrees of damage, it cannot be regarded as one occurrence, but the damage to each plaintiff is a separate occurrence. Id. at 915-16. Following Lombard, “the damage to each [child] is a separate occurrence.” See also Interstate, 747 F.Supp. at 624 (“Each time this negligent supervision presented Father Laughlin with the opportunity to molest a different child, the Archdiocese was exposed to new liability,” which constitutes an “occurrence” under the policy language); Maurice Pincoffs Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 447 F.2d 204, 206 (5th Cir.1971) (<HOLDING>). b. The Parents’ Claims Interstate argues that
holding that each separate pull of a trigger during the same shooting spree is an event sufficiently in time and space to constitute an independent occurrence holding a judgment that reserved the issue of child support indefinitely and not pending the occurrence of a specific event to be final holding the payment of benefits at the occurrence of a single event an indicium of lack of an administrative scheme holding that the liability creating event constitutes an occurrence holding that there was no coverage because there was no occurrence within the meaning of the policy because defective workmanship does not constitute an accident or an occurrence under a commercial general liability policy