residence and had Smith’s photograph on them. Reginald Currie, Smith’s coconspirator, testified that he and Smith took firearms to New York where a friend, Flowers, sold them. Smith, Currie, and Flowers were arrested together in New York in a car eo-owned by Smith and his girlfriend, two days after Smith purchased the firearms in North Carolina. At the time of his arrest, Smith had $1,800 and a small amount of cocaine on his person. The possession of the drugs and money was consistent with Currie’s testimony that Smith sold the guns at an approximate value of $700 each in cash and drugs. We therefore conclude that viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the Government, the district court did not err in denying the motion for acquittal. IV Last, Smith contends th Cir.2005) (<HOLDING>). Moreover, on appeal, Smith does not challenge
holding that the armed career criminal designation based on prior convictions does not violate the sixth amendment under booker holding that defendants sixth amendment right to trial by a jury was not violated by district courts reliance on his prior convictions for purposes of sentencing under the acca even though convictions were neither charged in indictment nor admitted holding that a conviction for florida armed robbery is a crime of violence under the armed career criminal act holding that defendants sixth amendment right to trial by a jury was not violated by district courts reliance on his prior convictions for purposes of sentencing under the armed career criminal act holding that there is no sixth amendment right to jury sentencing