performance of a land sale contract permits the. landowner to freely dispose of the land prior to appellate review, thereby potentially leaving the plaintiff with no adequate remedy on appeal because, due to the uniqueness of all land, monetary damages are an inadequate remedy). We, therefore, grant the petition and quash the order on review. , Florida law has long recognized the use of specific performance' to enforce contracts for the sale of homestead property. See Koplon v. Smith, 271 So.2d 762, 763 (Fla.1972) (explaining that while two witnesses are required to obtain specific performance of a contract to sell a homestead, there is no similar requirement to specifically perform a contract to sell non-homestead property); Scott v. Hotel Martinique, 48 So.2d 160, 161 (Fla.1950) (<HOLDING>); Westerberg v. Nininger, 149 Fla. 528, 6 So.2d
holding that property held by husband and wife in tenancy by entirety is exempt from attachment or execution for the sole debts of husband holding that regardless of whether the property was held as tenants in common or by the entirety the husband was entitled to hold property as a homestead holding that a contract for the sale of homestead property may be specifically enforcedif thecontract has been jointly executed by the husband and wife in the presence of two subscribing witnesses holding that the general homestead exemption may not be invoked to defeat claims against the holder for taxes and assessments against the homestead property holding that even if divorced wife only owned a beneficial interest and not title interest in the residence constituting her homestead she was nonetheless entitled to claim a homestead exemption from the forced sale of the property