and out of deference to the JPML, the Court finds it prudent to temporarily stay this case pending a decision by the JPML.” Order, November 25, 2013, 2013 WL 6212149 (Dkt. 22). On January 8, 2014, this Court lifted the stay following a decision by the JPML to decline consolidation of this case with others pending in other states. Order, January 8, 2014 (Dkt. 24). The Court now considers the pending Motion to Dismiss. II. LEGAL STANDARD Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), a complaint must be dismissed when a plaintiffs allegations fail to set forth facts which, if true, would entitle the complainant to relief. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 173 L.Ed.2d 868 (2009) (<HOLDING>). The pleadings must raise the right to relief
recognizing that to survive dismissal a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter accepted as true to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face internal quotation marks omitted holding that a mere allegation of fraud is insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss pursuant to the pslra holding that to survive a motion to dismiss a complaint must contain more than an unadorned thedefendantunlawfullyharmedme accusation it must set forth sufficient factual matter accepted as true to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face quoting twombly 550 us at 570127 sct 1955 holding that making a nonfrivolous allegation is insufficient to survive a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction holding that a claim must be facially plausible in order to survive a motion to dismiss