court and not the Court of Claims.” Welch v. Ill. Supreme Court, 751 N.E.2d 1187, 1195, 322 Ill.App.3d 345, 256 Ill.Dec. 350 (Ill. App.Ct.2001); Mgmt. Ass’n of Ill., Inc. v. Bd. of Regents of N. Ill. Univ., 618 N.E.2d 694, 705, 248 Ill.App.3d 599, 188 Ill.Dec. 124 (Ill.App.Ct.1993). In Patterson v. Burge, the plaintiff alleged that prosecutors acted intentionally and maliciously by physically abusing him, coercing his confession and fabricating oral admissions and reports that were later used against him at trial. 328 F.Supp.2d 878, 884 (N.D.Ill. 2004) (Patterson I). The court found these allegations sufficient to demonstrate that prosecutors had acted outside the scope of their authority. Id. at 887; see Cannon v. Burge, No. 05 C 2192, 2006 WL 273544, at *17 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 2, 2006) (<HOLDING>); see also Orange, 2005 WL 742641, at *18
holding that the defendant prosecutor acted outside his authority where he made false public statements discrediting evidence of torture refused to investigate and suppressed evidence of torture and used his position to maintain the plaintiffs wrongful conviction holding that appellant was not lawfully detained for investigation of public intoxication when he gave false identification therefore trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress his false identification statements holding that the failure to investigate and present the confession of a third party deprived defendant of the most critical evidence supporting his best defense holding that petitioner had exhausted his claim by explicitly mentioning in his brief to the bia that he was requesting reversal of the ijs denial of relief under the convention against torture holding that various law enforcement personnel and judges were victims of the crime of making false statements to a government agency for purposes of  3a12a where the defendant made false statements about the officials to the irs causing the irs to investigate the officials certainly had the effect of making these individuals the defendants victims