Tort Claims Act). Here, the booking room was employed for the purpose of booking persons taken into custody; the booking room was “used” for booking purposes. “Use” of the room may include arranging furniture to facilitate the booking process. It is foreseeable that an individual in the booking room may be injured if the booking room is not properly nor safely arranged. This would be true particularly if the individual had some known medical condition or impairment, such as epilepsy. Conceivably, negligent or improper “use” of a room may very well cause personal injury. We find that the booking officer’s “use” of the booking room was equivalent to the “use” of personal property as contemplated in § 101.021(2). Compare Robinson v. Central Texas MHMR Ctr., 780 S.W.2d 169, 171 (Tex.1989) (<HOLDING>) and Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297,
holding that psychiatrist had duty to protect individuals endangered by his epileptic patient holding that upon admission to a hospital the hospitals lien attached to the proceeds of all insurance claims accruing to the patient or his legal representative as a result of the patients hospitalization holding that hospitals failure to provide epileptic and mentally retarded patient with a life preserver to be used as part of his swimming attire brought the case under  1010212 holding that universitys failure to provide football player with proper protective gear to be used as part of his football uniform brought the case under  1010212 holding that the hospitals failure to provide patient with a hospital bed with side rails brought the case under  1010212