App. 293. As to Miller’s health, the District Court accounted for the fact that Miller’s medical condition would make his incarceration more difficult. Indeed, the District Court stated that it would have varied upward more but for Miller’s health. Thus, the sentence was not substantively unreasonable. V The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. 1 . State and federal authorities have since revoked Miller’s registration as an investment adviser representative and have barred him from association with the securities industry. In re Miller, Investment Advisers Act Release No. IA-3840, 108 SEC Docket 4484 (May 30, 2014); In re Cap. Mkts. Advisory, LLC, Summary Order, 2010 WL 6363111, ¶ 3 (N.J. Bureau Sec. Dec. 20, 2010); see also Schmidt v. Skolas, 770 F.3d 241, 249 (3d Cir. 2014) (<HOLDING>). 2 . We cite to Appellee's brief, which is not
holding that undisputed matters of public record are proper subjects for judicial notice recognizing that a court may take judicial notice of a document filed in another court  to establish the fact of such litigation and related filings recognizing that a court may rely on matters of which a court may take judicial notice holding that the existence of prior convictions are typically matters of public record of which the trial court can take judicial notice without violating the defendants right to due process holding that courts may take judicial notice of sec filings that are matters of public record