Zhang (son of Jun Yun Zhang) and a proffer interview with Jun Yun Zhang. The court did not clearly err in relying on the PSR and finding that the included statements were reliable. In calculating a defendant’s sentencing range, a court may consider all relevant information that has “sufficient indicia of reliability to support its probable accuracy,” U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3 (2011); United States v. Morales, 655 F.3d 608, 646 (7th Cir.2011), and may adopt the factual findings of the PSR if it has indicia of reliability, Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(b)(6)(D); United States v. Berkey, 161 F.3d 1099, 1101-02 (7th Cir.1998). In this case, the grand jury statements and proffer interview provided detailed, corroborated testimony by co-conspirators. See United States v. Ewers, 54 F.3d 419, 421-22 (7th Cir.1995) (<HOLDING>). Both Lili Liu and Tao Zhang admitted to
holding a failure to object to a witnesses testimony while the witness was on the stand justified overruling a motion for a mistrial made several witnesses later holding that material for witnesses need not be produced to defendant where the witnesses were not called as government witnesses at trial holding that a district court was entitled to accept or reject testimony on the basis of the witnesses demeanor and candor or lack thereof and contradictions in the witnesses testimony holding that criminal defendants are entitled to obtain for impeachment purposes statements made by government witnesses to government agents that relate to the subject matter of the witnesses direct testimony holding that selfinterested witnesses can be reliable when they provide detailed testimony that is corroborated by other witnesses or facts