Crim’s right of survivorship which is not voidable by a judicial lien creditor or bona fide purchaser without notice. Conclusion In response to the first certified question, we conclude that the deed of trust was improperly acknowledged under Tennessee law. In response to the second certified question, we conclude that the defective acknowledgment renders the deed of trust with respect to the transfer of Edward James Crim, Sr.’s interest in the property null and void as to subsequent judicial hen creditors or a bona fide purchaser. The only interest encumbered by the June 6, 1997, deed of trust in this case is Jayne Crim’s survivorship interest in the property. Having answered the certified questions, the Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this opinion in accorda . E.D.Tenn.1996)
holding that the date of the federal indictment not the date of the state arrest was the triggering date for the speedytrial act holdingin an adversary proceeding in which the issue was whether the certificate of acknowledgment must include the date of signingthat the date was not required and that the statutory short form of acknowledgment was not dispositive because while the date is indeed a part of the short form of acknowledgment authorized under ohio revcode  14755 that section does not preclude the use of other forms holding that the deferential standard of review of a plan interpretation is appropriate only when the trust instrument allows the trustee to interpret the instrument and when the trust ee has in fact interpreted the instrument holding that a release of such claims or other matters arising from the beginning of time to the date of execution of this agreement did not protect the defendant from liability arising from unconstitutional conduct that occurred after the agreements execution holding that the omission of the date of execution on the acknowledgment did not render it invalid when read in conjunction with the instrument