been shown to have had the requisite value at any time during the period of possession or concealment. Luckey, 655 F.2d at 205. In determining whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict, all conflicts are resolved in favor of the verdict. United States v. Ramos, 558 F.2d 545, 546-47 (9th Cir.1977). In this case, we find that evidence, properly admitted at trial, indicating the ease with which blank airline tickets can be filled in to make the tickets appear valid, provided a reasonable basis for the jury to find that the tickets in Wallace’s possession had a value equal to the losses that the airlines usually sustain on stolen tickets. See United States v. Drebin, 557 F.2d 1316, 1331 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 904, 98 S.Ct. 2232, 56 L.Ed.2d 401 (1978) (<HOLDING>). Because the lowest estimated average loss on
holding that the single transaction rule protects a purchaser of stolen goods who by definition must know the goods to be stolen from being made party to the original theft via conspiracy holding that when stolen goods have no readily ascertainable value the factfinder may consider any reasonable method by which to ascribe a monetary worth to the goods holding that a buyer who purchases goods subject to an express warranty that the goods are free from all liens takes free of any unperfected security interest holding that a creditors pmsi in goods sold to debtors did not survive consolidation of the original installment contract with a later contract for the purchase of additional goods holding that a statement of conditional sale of goods can be filed with the state auditor before the delivery of goods where statute says the statement must be filed within ten days of delivery of goods