do not urge as grounds for relief 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 1985 and 1986, or 28 U.S.C.A. § 2680, those issues have been abandoned. 4 . 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). 5 . 462 U.S. 367, 103 S.Ct. 2404, 76 L.Ed.2d 648 (1983). 6 . Gleason v. Malcom, 718 F.2d 1044 (11th Cir.1983). 7 . 487 U.S. 412, 108 S.Ct. 2460, 101 L.Ed.2d 370 (1988). 8 . Pub.L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111 et seq. (codified as amended at 5 U.S.C.A.). 9 . S.Rep. No. 95-969, 2nd Sess. 3 (1978), 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 2723, 2725. 10 s claims have been adjudicated. The summary judgment record, however, gives no indication that Aletha Rollins pursued her administrative remedies. 18 . 5 U.S.C.A. § 2302(a)(2)(A) (listing personnel actions covered by statute). 19 . Bivens v. Six U 1048 (11th Cir.1983) (<HOLDING>), quoted approvingly in Gremillion v.
holding the same with respect to violations of the fifth amendment holding that various fifth and sixth amendment protections apply to juvenile proceedings holding that bush analysis applies to claims under first fourth fifth and sixth amendment violations holding that the court lacks jurisdiction over sixth amendment claims because the sixth amendment is not moneymandating holding the sixth amendment right to a jury trial applies to the states through the fourteenth amendment