rights ... to park on the Property pursuant to terms and conditions of the Easements. That language clearly demonstrates the parties’ intent that the Easement was to continue upon reconveyance. Furthermore, the language in the deed reconveying the Ocean Avenue Property to the City, which specified that the property was being conveyed “[s]ubject to” the Easement at issue, is sufficient as a matter of law to reserve the Easement for Boston/Logan. See Barnside v. Coughlin, 422 Mass. 233, 661 N.E.2d 929, 930 (1996) (affirming Land Court’s summary judgment decision that mortgage purporting to be “[s]ubject to proposed right of way” was sufficient to reserve to grantor the right to create an easement); Texon, Inc. v. Holyoke Machine Co., 8 Mass.App.Ct. 363, 394 N.E.2d 976, 978 (1979) (<HOLDING>). Surf Site argues that the parties could not
recognizing that where a grantee has an easement which he shares with others his duty to repair and maintain it must be apportioned with all other easement holders based upon the extent of the individuals use of the easement holding that an easement agreement and an unrecorded easement plan created an easement holding that one who possesses deeded easement need not use the easement to maintain his title and easement cannot be extinguished from nonuser alone holding that deed purporting to be subject to rights of the grantor holyoke to maintain steam and electrical conduits was sufficient to create an easement holding a quitclaim deed yields only such interest in land as the grantor had at the time of the making of such deed