{17} We are skeptical about the validity of Zamora’s theory that only a junior mortgagee or other lienholder who does not foreclose its own mortgage may redeem. Once a foreclosure decree is entered in favor of a senior mortgagee and the property is sold at foreclosure sale, a junior mortgagee or other lienholder who was a party to the action would not seem to retain an enforceable mortgage lien against the property even if it had not foreclosed its own hen. A purchaser at foreclosure sale would presumably receive a deed free and clear of the hens of junior hen claimants who were parties to the mortgage foreclosure action. See 59 C.J.S. Mortgages § 557 (1998); 59A C.J.S. Mortgages §§ 829(b), 881(a), 900, 901(b) (1998); see also Hadley v. Schow, 146 Neb. 163, 18 N.W.2d 923, 927 (1945) (<HOLDING>); Atl. City Nat’l Bank v. Wilson, 108 N.J. Eq.
holding that in a case in which an omitted junior mortgagee foreclosed its mortgage the junior mortgagee had the absolute right to redeem from the senior mortgagee who had purchased the property at a sale following foreclosure of the senior mortgage holding the real estate sale proceeds holding that the junior mortgagee had no right title or interest in the real estate after the sale was confirmed in the purchaser who became title owner holding that the legal title holders to real property held it in constructive trust for the equitable title holder who was entitled to the real property based on an earlier contract holding that where the grantee a named corporation did not exist at the time of the purported conveyance and was not capable of taking title title to real estate did not pass and no real estate transfer tax was owed