of the case to chapter 7. Having found that the funds held by the Trustee are property of the Debtor, the motion to compel will be granted. An appropriate order will be entered. 1 . The filing of this case pre-dated the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005, Pub.L. No. 109-8, 119 Stat. 37 ("BAPCPA”), which became effective on October 17, 2005. 2 . I have jurisdiction to hear this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157 and 1334. This matter is core pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(A) and (O). This Opinion constitutes findings of fact and conclusions of law required to be made by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure ("FRBP”) 7052, which is applicable to contested matters pursuant to FRBP 9014. 3 . See, e.g., Resendez v. Lindquist, 691 F.2d 397, 399 (8th Cir.1982) (<HOLDING>); Matter of Lybrook, 951 F.2d 136 (7th
holding that the conversion of a chapter 7 petition to a chapter 13 petition was not final until the plan itself was approved holding that funds held by chapter 13 trustee become property of the chapter 7 estate upon conversion not subject to exemption holding tort action accruing after original chapter 7 petition not part of estate when case converted to chapter 13 and then back to chapter 7 holding that the 1994 amendment to  348 of the bankruptcy code should control in preamendment ongoing cases and that the debtors tort causes of action that accrued while the case was proceeding under chapter 13 did not become property of the estate or subject to the bankruptcy proceedings upon conversion of the case to chapter 7 proceedings holding that since property of the chapter 7 estate relates back to what was property of the bankruptcy estate when the chapter 13 was commenced and since the debtor still has the vehicle in his possession the present equity in the vehicle does not belong to the chapter 7 trustee or to unsecured creditors of this estate