the family will continue towards reunification or whether an alternative plan must be adopted.” N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. G.M., 198 N.J. 382, 400, 968 A.2d 698 (2009) (citing N.J.S.A. 30:4C-61.2). 12 That day, the court issued a compliance review order continuing to require Troy and Fernanda to participate in various forms of counseling as well as parenting-skills training as referred by DYFS. 13 The same day, in light of the Title 30 guardianship complaint, the family court issued an order terminating DYFS's Title 9 abuse-or-neglect action. The court also issued a case management order, requiring that Quinn and Troy, Jr. “remain in the care, custody and supervision of the Division.” See N.J. Div. of Youth & Family Servs. v. M.M., 189 N.J. 261, 292, 914 A.2d 1265 (2007) (<HOLDING>). 14 On March 27, Fernanda gave birth to the
recognizing home state jurisdiction under  61514la florida statutes if florida was the childs home state at any time during the six months preceding the filing of the custody proceeding recognizing that irrespective of the outcome of the title 9 hearing the court had the authority under njsa 304012 to retain custody of the child because the childs health and welfare would be at risk if returned to the home holding that the outcome of the case could have been different if the trial court had imposed the appropriate burden holding that trial court improperly awarded custody of child to the childs stepmother and grandparents where no pleading in the case was directed at such relief and the childs mother had no notice that the issue would be considered holding that the primary concern in deciding child custody cases is promoting the childs highest welfare