31 . Id. 32 . Id. at 696. 33 . Id. at 697 (citation omitted). 34 .In contrast, the statute upheld in Village of Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc., 455 U.S. 489, 496-97, 102 S.Ct. 1186, 71 L.Ed.2d 362 (1982), only targeted the marketing of products "designed or marketed for use with illegal cannabis or drugs.” By its very terms, that speech would only propose an illegal transaction, id. at 496, 102 S.Ct. 1186, as the same products marketed for legal uses would not fall within the scope of the regulation. 35 . See Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 23-24, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973); Smith v. California, 361 U.S. 147, 150, 80 S.Ct. 215, 4 L.Ed.2d 205 (1959). 36 . See K.S.A. § 21 — 4301(c)(3); see also State v. Hughes, 246 Kan. 607, 792 P.2d 1023, 1032 (1990) (<HOLDING>). 37 . See, e.g., Reliable Consultants, Inc. v.
holding floridas stalking statute which contained the language constitutionally protected activity is not included in the course of conduct definition and constitutional protected activity includes picketing or other organized protests was not impermissibly vague holding that a person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment holding that false statements are constitutionally protected holding that a sixmonth gap between the protected activity and the employees termination was insufficient to infer that the protected activity was a contributing factor holding that the dissemination and promotion of such devices for purposes of medical and psychological therapy is a constitutionally protected activity