to manage a jury's access to evidence presented at trial. See Settle v. People, 180 Colo. 262, 264, 504 P.2d 680, 680 (1972); Crim. P. 57(b) (trial courts may proceed in any lawful manner when a procedure is not otherwise specified). However, trial courts are limited in the exercise of that discretion and charged with ensuring that when evidence is given to the jury for use during deliberations, it is "not so selected, nor used in such a manner, that there is a likelihood of it being given undue weight or emphasis by the jury." Settle, 180 Colo. at 264, 504 P.2d at 681. The court of appeals has followed our holding in Settle when reviewing trial court decisions to allow jurors' access to videotaped evidence or testimony. See People v. Montoya, 773 P.2d 623, 626 (Colo.App.1989) (<HOLDING>) (citing Settle, 180 Colo. at 264, 504 P.2d at
holding that witness statements in police report inadmissible holding that defendant could not claim error in part because he did not request the district court to review the witness reports in question which would allow the district court to review the statements and excise incriminating information holding that statements in proof of loss are not conclusive claimant could explain statements holding that a trial court may allow jurors to review a videotape of a witness previous statements under circumstances that will assure that such statements are not given undue weight or emphasis holding that the jury is the judge of the weight and credibility given to witness testimony