containing elements of chance can qualify as games of skill as long as skill is the “designating element of the outcome.” Taken together, the provisions of the Phoenix City Code create an “articulable standard” sufficient to give rise to a legitimate claim of entitlement. Parks v. Watson, 716 F.2d 646, 657 (9th Cir.1983) (finding that criteria for vacating plotted city streets created a property interest notwithstanding the fact that one of the criteria broadly directed the decision-maker to consider “the public interest,” and noting that “a determination as to whether the public interest will be prejudiced, while obviously giving a certain amount of play in the decisional process, defines an articulable standard.”); cf. Allen v. City of Beverly Hills, 911 F.2d 367, 371 (9th Cir.1990) (<HOLDING>); Kraft, 872 F.2d at 867 (holding that a Nevada
holding that the existence of the general indiangovernment trust relationship does not create a property interest where one does not otherwise exist holding that property interest in continued expectation of public employment does not include right to actually occupy position holding that the city had standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute allowing certain communities within the same county as the city to incorporate as towns without the citys consent holding that a provision allowing the beverly hills city council to abolish any position in the classified service when necessary in the interests of economy or because the necessity for the position no longer exists does not significantly constrain the citys discretion and thus does not create a property interest holding that because property was no longer property of the estate the court could not order turnover