$1,316, the obligation under the Consent Order, equals $454 per month. 10 . But for the noting of an appeal prior to the entry of the final judgment of divorce, the interlocutory orders would have become final on October 12, 2001. Md. Rule 2-602. 11 . From our review of the record, it is not clear that the court fully appreciated that it had the discretion to modify this agreement without the mutual consent of both parties. 12 . If the issue before the court had been revision of an enrolled final order because of fraud, mistake or irregularity, then Rule 2-535(b) would have been relevant to the discussion. Tandra S. v. Tyrone W., 336 Md. 303, 315, 648 A.2d 439 (1994)(stating that Rule 2-535(b) generally applies to all final judgments); Platt v. Platt, 302 Md. 9, 485 A.2d 250
holding a motion to revise an enrolled divorce decree because of a discrepancy between the separation agreement and the decree filed more than 5 years after entry of the enrolled decree was properly denied holding that the trial judge had the power to incorporate a settlement agreement in a decree following the entry of a decree of divorce holding that a motion to terminate a consent decree was moot because there was no  consent decree left to be terminated holding that where the action was filed as a class action and a consent decree was entered into entry of the consent decree was sufficient certification of the action as a class action under rule 23 holding that a motion to terminate a consent decree was moot because the challenged provisions of the decree had expired