or hypothetical), which is fairly traceable to the challenged action of the defendant, and that is likely to be redressed by a favorable decision (instead of merely speculative). (Doc. 18 at 1) (citing White’s Place, Inc. v. Glover, 222 F.3d 1327, 1329 (11th Cir.2000)). The JIC Defendants claim that "Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that each of these standing requirements are in fact satisfied.” Id. 30 .The JIC Defendants argue that "[h]ere, Plaintiffs are challenging the constitutionality of a non-binding advisory opinion, not the validity of the Canon which were interpreted in the advisory opinion and not the authority of the JIC to render the opinion[,]” and that "[bjecause the opinion does not represent 'a rule or regulation of an admin S.Ct. 956, 22 L.Ed.2d 113 (1969) (<HOLDING>); and, Renne v. Geary, 501 U.S. 312, 321-22,
recognizing standing of congressman udall as a congressman and as a committee chairman holding that there was no standing where the prospective future candidacy of a former congressman was involved holding that citizen did not have standing where there was no showing of a procedural irregularity holding that there was no question that the full and fair opportunity element was met where there was no indication that such an opportunity was unavailable holding there was no claim and no basis for a claim of surprise concerning allegation of a former conviction