witness affidavits, Tatum’s guilty pleas, and the security footage. The district court denied qualified immunity on Tatum’s claims that Robinson used excessive force by pepper spraying and choking him. Robinson appeals. II. This court reviews de novo a district court’s denial of summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, viewing the evidence most favorably to the plaintiff. Tolan v. Cotton, - U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 1861, 1866, 188 L.Ed.2d 895 (2014) (per curiam); Shannon v. Koehler, 616 F.3d 855, 861-62 (8th Cir. 2010). See also Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 378, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) (ex-f plaining court should not adopt a party’s version of events if a video “clearly contradicts” its version of the story); Mann v. Yarnell, 497 F.3d 822, 826-27 (8th Cir. 2007) (<HOLDING>). To overcome an assertion of qualified
holding a plaintiff does not create a genuine issue of material fact by offering a dark and often unintelligible video coupled with an entirely speculative and wishful recitation of events that is neither substantiated by anything displayed in the video nor by the memory of any observer or participant present at the altercation holding that the video games at issue are expressive and qualify as speech for purposes of the first amendment holding that a speculative affidavit which contained mere conjecture was insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact for trial holding that plaintiff failed to show genuine issue of material fact on equitable estoppel claim holding that the original pto declarations create a genuine issue of material fact