by private developers, and the efforts of myriad event planners and guests who helped transform the Park into a social, cultural and recreational focal point for the City. ¶ 25. Another set of changes supporting consideration of the City’s application to amend Condition #19 involves the regulation and measurement of sound levels. The limitations in the 1994 permit are ambiguous; although they restrict sound to eighty-five decibels at the perimeter of the Park nearest the source of the sound and seventy-five decibels at the eastern edge of Lake Street adjacent to any residential or commercial property, they do not specify whether the restrictions limit the instantaneous decibel readings, or the average. See In re Lathrop Ltd. P’ship I, 2015 VT 49, ¶ 77, 199 Vt. 19, 121 A.3d 630 (<HOLDING>). At a minimum, the ambiguity in the prior
recognizing distinction between two types of waiver recognizing distinction between tolling and estoppel recognizing this distinction recognizing distinction between smith and mcdonnell recognizing distinction between lmax measurement which measures instantaneous noise and leqn which measures maximum noise level averaged over a period of time n