overrule a previous panel’s decision, a prior panel’s decision controls over a subsequent panel’s contrary decision. See Morrison v. Amway Corp., 323 F.3d 920, 929 (11th Cir.2003). Stated more plainly, when two cases conflict, the earliest case governs. This raises the question of which panel opinion constitutes the earliest case. The Court finds that National Advertising Co. v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 934 F.2d 283, 285 (11th Cir.1991), the earliest case cited to the Court by the parties, is binding as against all subsequent contrary decisions under the Eleventh Circuit’s “earliest case” rule. National Advertising Co. establishes a plaintiffs standing under the overbreadth doctrine to challenge ordinance provisions that were not applied against the plaintiff. See 934 F.2d at 285-86 (<HOLDING>). When the licensing scheme is content-neutral,
holding that court may not sever clause from initial ordinance and submit remainder of ordinance to voters holding that a plaintiff had standing to attack an entire ordinance including portions of the ordinance not applied to the plaintiff holding that the plaintiffs due process challenge to a city ordinance was barred because it was inextricably intertwined with a statecourt ruling that plaintiff lacked standing to challenge the ordinance holding that plaintiff could not request damages for a facial challenge to a zoning ordinance under the first amendment because the provision had not yet harmed the plaintiff holding certain plaintiffs did not have standing to attack ordinance governing sexually oriented businesses where the record did not reveal that any one of these plaintiffs was subject to the ordinance even though the city attorney conceded at oral argument before the supreme court that one or two of them had had their licenses denied under the ordinance