statutorily defined as “a blood or swab specimen from a person, as prescribed by administrative regulation, that is required to provide a DNA sample pursuant to KRS 17.170 or 17.510, that shall be submitted to the Department of Kentucky State Police forensic laboratory for law enforcement identification purposes and inclusion in law enforcement identification databases.... ” KRS 17.169(1) (emphasis added). In other words, a DNA sample refers to a "blood or swab specimen" from a person statutorily required to provide such a DNA sample and would not refer to a DNA profile obtained from a "crime scene specimen" such as the straw recovered from the crime scene here. 25 . KRS 17.510 deals with sex offender registration. 26 . See, e.g., Saylor v. Commonwealth, 144 S.W.3d 812, 817 (Ky.2004) (<HOLDING>). 27 . See generally Schmerber v. California,
holding a statutory violation insufficient to justify imposition of the exclusionary rule absent an underlying constitutional violation or right holding a statutory violation insufficient to justify imposition of the exclusionary rule absent an underlying constitutional violation or right or evidence that congress intended exclusion as a remedy holding that exclusionary rule only requires exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of constitutional rights and that exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of statutory rights is not necessarily required holding that agents violation of irs regulations did not mandate exclusion of evidence obtained as a result of violation recognizing that exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of statute serves as only effective deterrent of such violations