at 802-803 (2). In accordance with our holding, we remand this case for the conduct of a trial under the principle of quantum meruit. 3. Lewis’ attorney’s lien further sought reimbursement of $883.44 in expenses that he advanced on Smith’s behalf for the maintenance of the lawsuit. These expenses of litigation are separate from the attorney fees that Lewis claimed. Although the parties’ contract provided for a contingent attorney fee, they expressly agreed, pursuant to paragraph 2 of the contract, that Smith would reimburse Lewis for any and all costs or expenses advanced by him in handling the case. Accordingly, the evidence clearly established that Lewis was entitled to recover the litigation expenses that he advanced. Compare Donohue v. Green, 209 Ga. App. 381 (433 SE2d 431) (1993) (<HOLDING>). Cf. Brown & Huseby, Inc. v. Chrietzberg, 242
holding that there was no meeting of the minds as to expenses in the parties contingency fee contract and therefore the attorneys claim for reimbursement of litigation expenses was rejected holding that debtors have the burden of proving that other necessary expenses on form b22c are actual reasonable and necessary expenses and that these expenses should be considered in light of schedule j and other relevant evidence holding that damage claim for reimbursement of expenses incurred in performance of oral agreement was more accurately a request for restitution to return them to their former position and therefore it is  an equitable remedy holding that an award for medical expenses is proper when the expenses have been incurred but not paid holding that contingency fee contract did not cap award of attorneys fees where johnson had so held