guidance we can discern. Williams v. Lee, 358 U.S. 217, 79 S.Ct. 269, 3 L.Ed.2d 251 (1959), is the seminal case in establishing the standard by which non-Public Law 280 states may assert jurisdiction over Indians on reservation land. There the Court held that a state could not exercise jurisdiction in a way that would infringe upon tribal self-government, and set forth the generalized test known as the infringement test. In Williams, a non-Indian was a federally licensed trader residing on the Navaho reservation who sought to collect a debt against an In holding non-Indian logging operations conducted under contract with the tribe and solely on the reservation cannot be taxed by the state); Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes, 425 U.S. 463, 96 S.Ct. 1634, 48 L.Ed.2d 96 (1976) (<HOLDING>); Bryan v. Itasca County, supra (holding a
holding that the arrest of an indian on indian land was illegal because the state had no jurisdiction over the reservation to enforce its laws  including the execution of a search warrant  unless congress consented to the states jurisdiction holding that the state has no jurisdiction to pursue an indian onto an indian reservation for criminal offenses committed off the reservation holding state may not impose tax on nonindian trader operating on the reservation holding that state cannot impose vendor taxes on indian sellers who operate on the reservation holding that state has no jurisdiction over civil suit by nonindian against indian where cause of action arises on indian reservation