by the juvenile court. We leave it to the district court on remand to determine whether any City policy could be held to have caused any violation of the Wallises’ rights after the date of the juvenile court hearing. With respect to the four-day period between the removal and the court hearing, only one alleged violation of the Wallises’ rights merits separate consideration—the subjecting of Lauren and Jessie to invasive vaginal and anal medical examinations at the behest of the Escondido police department. The right to family association includes the right of parents to make important medical decisions for their children, and of children to have those decisions made by their parents rather than the state. See Parham v. J.R., 442 U.S. 584, 602, 99 S.Ct. 2493, 61 L.Ed.2d 101 (1979) (<HOLDING>); see also Calabretta v. Floyd, 189 F.3d 808
recognizing fundamental right of parents to care for their children holding that natural parents have a fundamental liberty interest in the care custody and management of their children holding that it is in the interest of both parents and children that parents have ultimate authority to make medical decisions for their children unless neutral fact finder determines through due process hearing that parent is not acting in childs best interests recognizing that the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment protects the fundamental right of parents to make decisions concerning the care custody and control of their children recognizing that because the state has cognizable interests in the safety of children in its jurisdiction neglectful parents may be separated from their children