enumerated in the statute. Also, the stan dards that govern subdivisions should incorporate the requirements set out in the local zoning ordinances, N.J.S.A 40:55D-38(b)(1), which, in turn, should be drawn with consideration for the “character of each district” and “to encourage the most appropriate use of land.” N.J.S.A 40:55D-62. Further, as stressed by the Appellate Division, “total suitability” is still a legitimate goal of municipal land-use ordinances. 261 N.J.Super. at 670, 619 A.2d 676. Subdivision ordinances may be flexible enough to allow broad discretion in the protection of the public interest, even though they must be reasonably specific to provide guidance and to foster consistency and fairness in their application. See Levin, supra, 35 N.J. at 511, 173 A.2d 391 (<HOLDING>). In sum, the general purposes of the land-use
recognizing that power to act in public welfare must be exercised in manner consistent with established standards holding that a courts power to allocate tax exemptions between parents must be exercised in accord with the internal revenue code holding that statute authorizing customs officials to board vessels must be interpreted in a manner consistent with limitations imposed by the fourth amendment holding that the meaning of a term in a claim must be consistent with its appearance in other claims in the same patent recognizing that the sentence imposed should be consistent with the protection of the public