excluded from participation in, be. denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity for which the applicanVrecipient receives Federal financial assistance. The specific requirements of the United States Department of Transportation standard Civil Rights assurances with regard to the States’ highway safety program (required by 49 CFR 21.7 and on file with the U.S. DOT) are incorporated into this grant agreement. (See Pis.’ Opp’n, Ex. 27 at 2, ¶ 11; see also Pis.’ Tr. Ex. 27 at 4, ¶ 4.) Consequently, as intended third-party beneficiaries to contractual provisions like the one cited above, Plaintiffs have standing to enforce the Department’s promise to comply with Title VI and applicable regulatory requirements. See Lemon, 370 F.2d at 851 (<HOLDING>); see. also United States v. Frazer, 297
holding in class action educational desegregation case that when defendants received and accepted federal funds  they became bound bysection 601  2000d  consequently plaintiffs are entitled to bring this class action suit either under section 601 of the civil rights act of 1964  2000d or under the contractual assurances by which defendants are estopped to deny them the  rights to attend desegregated schools holding that anesthesiologist whose staff privileges were terminated was not a hospital employee and thus could not bring suit under either the age discrimination in employment act or title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 holding that surgeon with surgical privileges was not an employee of hospital and thus could not bring suit under either the age discrimination in employment act or title vii of the civil rights act of 1964 holding that the right of all putative members of a proposed class in an action filed pursuant to kansass class action rule of civil procedure to file a separate action is preserved pending the determination of whether the initial case shall be maintained as a class action recognizing that title vi of the civil rights act of 1964 and title ix of the educational amendments of 1972 created individual federal rights because those statutes were phrased with an unmistakable focus on the benefitted class