(App.Div.1981). 21 .Under this statute and N.J.S.A. 30:4-6, persons convicted and sentenced to terms of one year or more are required to be confined in a state prison. N.J.S.A. 2C:43-10(e); see Cryan v. Klein, 148 N.J.Super. 27, 31-32, 371 A.2d 812, 814 (App.Div.1977) (construing N.J.S.A. 2A:164-18, the forerunner of N.J.S.A. 2C:43-10), certif'n granted, 75 N.J. 606, 384 A.2d 836, appeal dismissed, 87 N.J. 304, 434 A.2d 61 (1978). 22 . Worthington, 88 N.J. at 205, 440 A.2d at 1139. 23 . Cf. Worthington, 88 N.J. at 205, 440 A.2d at 1139 ("Until permanent quarters can be found for [certain] state inmates, it makes sense to confine them in the county jails where they are already incarcerated.”). 24 . See also State v. Rosenberg, 78 N.J.Super. 400, 402, 188 A.2d 635, 636 (App.Div.1963) (<HOLDING>). 25 . Defendant’s Memorandum of Law, Exhibit
holding that njsa 2aj6418 the forerunner of njsa 2c4310 did not create a liberty interest in an inmate holding that a prisoner has no constitutionallybased liberty interest in a particular prison classification  because an inmate is not entitled to a particular degree of liberty in prison holding that an inmate had no liberty interest in avoiding transfer to a more restrictive facility holding that inmate has a liberty interest under the due process clause to refuse the involuntary administration of psychotropic drugs holding that texas parole statutes do not create a protected liberty interest under an older statutory scheme