Florida’s sales and use tax to the majority of services marketed in the state, courts cannot realistically require the legislature to dictate every conceivable application of the law down to the most minute detail. As we noted in Microtel, Inc. v. Florida Public Service Commi lacking in guidelines that neither the agency nor the courts can determine whether the agency is carrying out the intent of the legislature.” Id. at 918-19. As in AT & T, there is “no indication that the legislative policy-making function has been usurped by or improperly transferred to the PSC,” or any indication that' its disputed order is “aimed at anything more than fostering [the legislative policy] to the fullest extent now possible.” 515 So.2d at 743; see also S.E. Volusia Hosp. Dist., 438 So.2d at 820 (<HOLDING>). We accordingly find no separation of powers
recognizing that when an interpretation upholding the constitutionality of a statute is available to this court it must adopt that construction holding that this court may independently review the administrative construction of a statute holding an administrative interpretation cannot change the meaning of a statute or control the courts interpretation of it holding that courts adopt statutes interpretation that is supported by statutes plain language if statute is unambiguous unless such interpretation would lead to absurd results recognizing that the standard of review for issues of statutory interpretation and construction is de novo