and financially secure. Although he does not have an advantage because he was awarded custody at the temporary hearing, he did a good job caring for the boys and Lillian for two years after the temporary order was entered. He is actively involved with the lives of the boys, participating in their activities, monitoring the time they spend watching television, and reading books with them. He properly feeds, clothes, and bathes the children. He cares for them when they are sick. With Randy as the primary physical care giver, the boys will continue to live in the family home and attend the school where Ryan was enrolled. They will continue a daily relationship with their half-sister, Lillian, another factor in our decision. See In re Marriage of Pundt, 547 N.W.2d 243, 247 (Iowa App.1996)(<HOLDING>). There is a span of five years between Lillian
recognizing a strong public policy of keeping siblings together following divorce so as not to deprive children the important benefit of growing up together holding that a judges infringement of an important public policy is grounds for aggravation holding it is settled that in construing an endorsement to an insurance policy the endorsement and the policy must be read together and the words of the policy remain in full force and effect except as altered by the words of the endorsement recognizing a strong policy preference in favor of arbitration holding an exception to confrontation clause must further important public policy