537 A.2d at 339). On cross-examination,. a fact-witness may be questioned with respect to any publication in the field that he considers generally reliable and the evidence is admissible to challenge the witness’s credibility, but the writing cannot be admitted for the truth of the matter asserted. Majdic, mi A.2d at 339. Excerpts from a publication which are read into evidence for the purpose of proving the truth of the statements contained therein are still hearsay and, therefore, inadmissible. This fact is not changed merely because the document is read into evidence by the witness instead of being received as an exhibit for inspection by the jury. It is the purpose for which the information is offered, not the manner in which is introduced, which makes it objectionable.. Id. at 340 (<HOLDING>). Upon a party’s request, the trial court shall
holding that trial court did not err holding that trial court erred in prohibiting discovery or testimony from a witness it deemed an expert when appellant merely sought to discover facts that were observed by the witness holding juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in admitting expert testimony holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting gangrelated evidence holding trial court did not err by prohibiting expert witness from reading contents of treatises into evidence and by not admitting treatises into evidence