834 A.2d 505, 512 (Pa. 2003). 95 . Armbruster v. Horowitz, 813 A.2d 698, 702 (Pa. 2002). 96 . Harman ex rel. Harman v. Borah, 756 A.2d 1116, 1122 (Pa. 2000). 97 . Renna v. Schadt, 64 A.3d 658,670 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2013) (internal citations omitted). 98 . Harman, 756 A.2d at 1122. 99 . Id. 100 . 11 A.3d 456 (Pa. 2011). 101 . Calender v. Allegheney County Sanitary Auth., 222 A.2d 461, 463 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1966). 102 . Restatement (Second) of Torts §414 (1965). 103 . Restatement (Second) of Torts §414 com. (a). 104 . Id. 105 . Restatement (Second) of Torts §414 com. (c). 106 . 317 A.2d 280 (Pa. 1974). 107 . id at 282. 108 . Farabaugh v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Com’n, 911 A.2d 1264, 1271 (Pa. 2006). 109 . Id. at 1275. See also LaChance v. Michael Baker Corp., 869 A.2d 1054 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2005) (<HOLDING>). 110 . Id. at 1282. 111 . 11 A.3d456 (Pa.
holding that retained control exception did not apply where landowner contractually retained and exercised right to safety inspections but did not exercise any other control over the manner or operational details of the project because contract language was standard and it was against public policy to impose liability on landowner for addressing safety in the contract holding that the principal must have control and supervision over the details of the agents work holding that to establish a prima facie case of control person liability a plaintiff must establish that the alleged control person actually participated in ie exercised control over the operations of the primary violator in general internal quotations omitted holding that a public trust that exercised control over the beneficiarys employment did not change the benefit plan into a government plan because the trust did not establish the plan or control it holding that any attempt by way of contract to deprive a city of  control over exercise of it police powers is void