CURIAM. Iowa inmate Beau T. Berge appeals from the final judgment ent 991) (§ 1983 suit; holding officer who was aware affidavit was untruthful “should have known [it] would violate the accused’s constitutional rights”). As to Shatto, Milburn, and Lamack, however, Berge failed to specify in his complaint how any of them violated a protected right. See Martin v. Sargent, 780 F.2d 1334, 1338 (8th Cir.1985) (<HOLDING>). Accordingly, we reverse the dismissal of
holding that plaintiff had failed to state a claim for relief under section 1983 holding that a plaintiff in a bivens action must allege that the individual defendant was personally involved in the constitutional violation holding that to prevail on a  1983 claim a plaintiff must allege that the defendant acted under color of state law in other words that there was state action holding a plaintiff must allege the violation of a right secured by the constitution and laws of the united states to state a claim under  1983 holding that to state  1983 claim against defendant plaintiff must allege that defendant was personally involved in or had direct responsibility for incidents that resulted in injury