human
TASK: Your task is to answer biomedical questions using the given abstract. Only output yes, no, or maybe as answer.
INPUT: ['Differentiation of enhancing malignant lesions on conventional MR imaging can be difficult and various newer imaging techniques have been suggested. Our aim was to evaluate the role of PSR obtained from DSC perfusion measurements in differentiating lymphoma, GBM, and metastases. The effectiveness of PSR was compared with that of rCBV. We hypothesized that the newly defined parameter of PSR is more sensitive and specific in differentiating these lesions.', 'This retrospective study included 66 patients (39 men and 27 women; age range: 27-82 years) with a pathologically proved diagnosis of primary CNS lymphoma, GBM, or metastases (22 patients in each group). Mean PSR, min PSR, max PSR, and rCBV were calculated. The classification accuracy of these parameters was investigated by using ROC.', 'Mean PSR was high (113.15 ± 41.59) in lymphoma, intermediate in GBM (78.22 ± 14.27), and low in metastases (53.46 ± 12.87) with a P value < .000. F values obtained from 1-way ANOVA analysis for mean, min, and max PSR ratios were 29.9, 39.4, and 23.4, respectively, which were better than those of rCBV (11.1) in differentiating the 3 groups. Max PSR yielded the best ROC characteristics with an A(z) of 0.934 (95% CI, 0.877-0.99) in differentiating lymphoma from metastases and GBM. The A(z) for mean and min PSR of 0.938 (95% CI, 0.0.884-0.990) and 0.938 (95% CI, 0.884-0.991), respectively, was better than rCBV (A(z), 0.534; 95% CI, 0.391-0.676) in the differentiation of metastases from GBM and lymphoma (P ≤ .0001).'] Is percentage signal recovery derived from MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging useful to differentiate common enhancing malignant lesions of the brain?
OUTPUT:

agent
yes
TASK: Your task is to answer biomedical questions using the given abstract. Only output yes, no, or maybe as answer.
INPUT: ['Differentiation of enhancing malignant lesions on conventional MR imaging can be difficult and various newer imaging techniques have been suggested. Our aim was to evaluate the role of PSR obtained from DSC perfusion measurements in differentiating lymphoma, GBM, and metastases. The effectiveness of PSR was compared with that of rCBV. We hypothesized that the newly defined parameter of PSR is more sensitive and specific in differentiating these lesions.', 'This retrospective study included 66 patients (39 men and 27 women; age range: 27-82 years) with a pathologically proved diagnosis of primary CNS lymphoma, GBM, or metastases (22 patients in each group). Mean PSR, min PSR, max PSR, and rCBV were calculated. The classification accuracy of these parameters was investigated by using ROC.', 'Mean PSR was high (113.15 ± 41.59) in lymphoma, intermediate in GBM (78.22 ± 14.27), and low in metastases (53.46 ± 12.87) with a P value < .000. F values obtained from 1-way ANOVA analysis for mean, min, and max PSR ratios were 29.9, 39.4, and 23.4, respectively, which were better than those of rCBV (11.1) in differentiating the 3 groups. Max PSR yielded the best ROC characteristics with an A(z) of 0.934 (95% CI, 0.877-0.99) in differentiating lymphoma from metastases and GBM. The A(z) for mean and min PSR of 0.938 (95% CI, 0.0.884-0.990) and 0.938 (95% CI, 0.884-0.991), respectively, was better than rCBV (A(z), 0.534; 95% CI, 0.391-0.676) in the differentiation of metastases from GBM and lymphoma (P ≤ .0001).'] Is percentage signal recovery derived from MR dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging useful to differentiate common enhancing malignant lesions of the brain?
OUTPUT:
