human
TASK: Your task is to answer biomedical questions using the given abstract. Only output yes, no, or maybe as answer.
INPUT: ['Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major determinant of long-term survival after heart transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PET as a noninvasive way to assess the early stages of CAV.', 'Twenty-seven consecutive patients (20 men and 7 women; mean age +/- SD, 46 +/- 12 y) who had normal results on coronary angiography and normal left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction >or= 60%) were enrolled at 2.5 +/- 2.1 y after transplantation. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed using dynamic (13)N-ammonia PET at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic MBF to resting MBF. Regional (13)N-ammonia PET was assessed using a 5-point scoring system. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements for the extent of intimal hyperplasia, including plaque volume index (calculated as [total plaque volume/total vessel volume] x 100%) and maximum area of stenosis, were compared with MPR by linear regression analysis.', 'In 27 angiographically normal cardiac transplant recipients, MBF at rest and during adenosine stress and MPR of the left anterior descending artery distribution correlated strongly with the other 2 coronary artery distribution territories (r >or= 0.97, P < 0.0001). Summed stress score and summed difference score showed a moderate inverse correlation with MPR (r = -0.41 and -0.49, respectively; P < 0.05) but not with IVUS measurements. MPR correlated inversely with plaque volume index (r = -0.40, P < 0.05) but not with maximal luminal stenosis as assessed by IVUS. In addition, MPR and IVUS measurements gradually inversely changed after heart transplantation (all P < 0.05).'] Does pET assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve inversely correlate with intravascular ultrasound findings in angiographically normal cardiac transplant recipients?
OUTPUT:

agent
yes
TASK: Your task is to answer biomedical questions using the given abstract. Only output yes, no, or maybe as answer.
INPUT: ['Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major determinant of long-term survival after heart transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PET as a noninvasive way to assess the early stages of CAV.', 'Twenty-seven consecutive patients (20 men and 7 women; mean age +/- SD, 46 +/- 12 y) who had normal results on coronary angiography and normal left ventricular systolic function (ejection fraction >or= 60%) were enrolled at 2.5 +/- 2.1 y after transplantation. Myocardial blood flow (MBF) was assessed using dynamic (13)N-ammonia PET at rest and during adenosine-induced hyperemia, and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) was calculated as the ratio of hyperemic MBF to resting MBF. Regional (13)N-ammonia PET was assessed using a 5-point scoring system. The intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) measurements for the extent of intimal hyperplasia, including plaque volume index (calculated as [total plaque volume/total vessel volume] x 100%) and maximum area of stenosis, were compared with MPR by linear regression analysis.', 'In 27 angiographically normal cardiac transplant recipients, MBF at rest and during adenosine stress and MPR of the left anterior descending artery distribution correlated strongly with the other 2 coronary artery distribution territories (r >or= 0.97, P < 0.0001). Summed stress score and summed difference score showed a moderate inverse correlation with MPR (r = -0.41 and -0.49, respectively; P < 0.05) but not with IVUS measurements. MPR correlated inversely with plaque volume index (r = -0.40, P < 0.05) but not with maximal luminal stenosis as assessed by IVUS. In addition, MPR and IVUS measurements gradually inversely changed after heart transplantation (all P < 0.05).'] Does pET assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve inversely correlate with intravascular ultrasound findings in angiographically normal cardiac transplant recipients?
OUTPUT:
