5.3%, with acknowledgement from the Court of the decreasing error rate in Rural Development over time, notes also the Court´s remark that Member States did not sufficiently take EU priorities into account1a, and considers that the difference is accounted for by the fact that the two CAP pillars differ in structure, design, scale and objectives;
je seznanjen z njegovo pripombo, da države članice niso dovolj upoštevale prednostnih nalog EU1a, in meni, da je mogoče razliko pojasniti z drugačno strukturo, obliko, obsegom in cilji stebrov skupne kmetijske politike;