the present invention addresses the problem of sharing the receive side antenna assembly among multiple base stations that use different cellular technologies . the figures and discussion herein illustrate a scenario involving a master base station and a single slave base station . this was done for ease of illustration and explanation only . co - siting multiple slave base stations can readily be done by imitating the concept used for a single slave base station . all that need be done is to determine the ip3 and nf curves for each particular slave base station and provide for means of attenuation to achieve optimal rf performance . [ 0017 ] fig1 is a generic block diagram illustrating the connections among base stations and mobile switching centers . shown here are three areas of coverage or cells 10 . within each cell 10 is an antenna assembly 12 that is shared by a pair of base stations , one a gsm base station 14 a and the other a tdma base station 14 b . each base station 14 a , 14 b is coupled with a mobile switching center ( msc ) 16 a , 16 b depending on the cellular technology employed , e . g . gsm or tdma . the mscs 16 a , 16 b are also coupled with the wireless or wireline telephony infrastructure such that calls involving portable wireless communications devices within one of the cells 10 serviced by an msc 16 a , 16 b are connected with another end user , be it wireless or wireline . the determination on which base station is the master and which is the slave depends on which base station is being added to the antenna assembly . logically , the second base station would become the master since it will be equipped with the requisite antenna sharing components . the original base station likely contained no such antenna sharing components since it did not contemplate sharing its antenna assembly . in the case where a new antenna assembly is being deployed with co - sited base stations , then it becomes a design choice as to which base station should be the master and which should be the slave since either can be equipped with antenna sharing components at the outset . in fig1 base station 14 a is shown as the master base station since it is directly coupled to the antenna 12 . slave base station 14 b receives its antenna feed via master base station 14 a . [ 0021 ] fig2 illustrates a more detailed block diagram of the antenna assembly , master base station , and slave base station . an antenna assembly 20 is connected to an optional dual duplex tower mounted amplifier ( ddtma ) unit 22 . the antenna assembly 20 assists in both reception ( rx ) and transmission ( tx ) of rf signals . it should be noted that the use of additional antenna assemblies for the purpose of providing rf diversity can be implemented without affecting the concept of the present invention . for ease of illustration only , the description is limited to a single antenna assembly 20 . if implemented , the ddtma 22 amplifies received signals coming from portable wireless communications devices within the area of coverage . the received signals often require amplification in order to be processed effectively downstream . the antenna assembly 20 and ddtma 22 combination is directly coupled to a master base station 24 . master base station 24 feeds the received from the ddtma 22 and applies the signal to a gain stage 26 . following the gain stage 26 the signal is forwarded to an antenna sharing unit ( asu ) 28 that is responsible for splitting the signal so that it can be fed to a slave base station 40 . the signal that is presented to the slave base station 40 includes an upfront gain that is the result of the processing applied in the master base station 24 . the idea is to make sure the upfront gain resulting from processing in the master base station 24 matches the upfront gain expected by the slave base station 40 had the slave base station 40 been directly coupled with the ddtma 22 . current solutions to antenna sharing focus solely on the upfront gain to ensure that the gain level supplied by the master base station 24 is the same as that expected by the slave base station 40 . the problem is that any signal manipulation by master base station 24 with respect to the upfront gain supplied to slave base station 40 will degrade the third order intercept ( ip3 ) of the signal presented to slave base station 40 and affect the system noise figure ( nf ). ip3 degradation affects the integrity of the signal being processed by slave base station 40 . it is important to note that standalone ( i . e ., non co - sited ) basestation specifications could have an upfront gain when a ddtma or tma is used . the gain stage 26 in the master base station 24 could be set to provide the expected upfront gain of the slave base station 40 . even if this is the case , the overall nf and ip3 values were changed with the addition of the master base station 24 such that the upfront gain still needs to be fine tuned by the present invention in order to optimize the rf performance of the slave base station 40 . thus , the goal is to provide the proper amount of upfront gain to slave base station 40 in order to provide optimal rf performance . this requires considering the inter - modulation ( im )/ ip3 and nf characteristics associated with a particular upfront gain value . in order to determine the optimal upfront gain , both ip3 and nf characteristics of slave base station 40 must be known . these values are readily obtainable for a range of upfront gain values and can be plotted . moreover , the cellular technology itself has promulgated standards that must be met to ensure adequate system quality . also , individual vendors also have their own , stricter , standards to meet . all of these values ( ip3 , nf , industry standards , and vendor standards ) can be plotted against upfront gain . as stated previously , simply adjusting the upfront gain to a desired expected level has the effect of degrading ip3 performance for the slave base station 40 . typically , the degradation does not fall below industry standards but often unnecessarily degrades overall system performance . by studying the plots of these values versus upfront gain , the optimal upfront gain value can be determined . moreover , this process can be tailored to suit the needs of a particular base station . ip3 / im relates to the interference a signal might be subjected to thereby affecting the capacity of the base station . nf , by contrast , relates to the power of the signal thereby affecting the coverage of the base station . ip3 and nf also define the dynamic range ( dr ) of the base station receiver . as was earlier noted , the present invention is a fine tuning system that makes adjustments on the order of ± 1 db as is evident in fig3 . thus , the dynamic range ( dr ) of the slave base station is negligibly affected . the method for adjusting the upfront gain involves the use of attenuator ( s ) coupled to the cable ( s ) connecting the master base station 24 to the slave base station 40 . one embodiment of an attenuator ( s ) can be physical device coupled to cable . this attenuator 44 would be manually controllable by an operator at the base station . typically , this attenuator 44 would be set for an optimal gain value based on characteristics as they exist at the time of installation of the attenuator 44 . a second attenuator 46 can be situated within the slave base station 40 prior to the gain stage and filtering component 48 of slave base station 40 . this could be a software controllable attenuator that is coupled to an interface controller 50 or the like . the interface controller 50 is coupled to the base station &# 39 ; s servicing msc 60 . the msc 60 provides for a convenient remote access point for controlling attenuator 46 . other means of remotely controlling attenuator 46 can be implemented without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention . the elements and components shown in fig2 that are not enumerated or described are typical to base stations in general and do not play a role with respect to the present invention . plots of ip3 and nf versus upfront gain provide a spectrum of choices . if coverage is a primary factor for a particular base station ( e . g ., one that is rurally situated ), then an upfront gain that maximizes nf performance can be chosen . or , if base station capacity is important ( e . g ., one that is situated amongst a dense population ), then an upfront gain that minimizes ip3 degradation can be chosen . since the plots are over a range of upfront gain values , the upfront gain that best suits the needs of a particular base station can be selected using a tradeoff between ip3 and nf . in addition , if the status of a base station changes over time , or changes temporarily , the upfront gain can be adjusted to reflect the new operating characteristics of the base station . this could occur , for instance , in an area that is undergoing rapid development where capacity is becoming more of a factor . another scenario could be a rural area that is home to a sports stadium or convention center that temporarily experiences high population densities . [ 0032 ] fig3 illustrates several plots of ip3 values and nf values versus upfront gain for a typical state of the art receiver system . the x - axis represents the upfront gain ranging from 0 to 10 db left to right . the left side y - axis represents the change in the noise figure ( nf ) while the right side y - axis represents the change in ip3 . there are eight ( 8 ) plots illustrated . plot 80 represents the vendor specification for the noise function ( nf ). it is a horizontal line having a y - value of 2 . any operating value of nf above plot 80 yields an nf that is worse than the vendor specifications while any value below plot 80 yields an nf that is better than the vendor specifications . plot 82 represents the vendor specification for the third order intercept ( ip3 ). it is a horizontal line having a y - value of one . any operating value of ip3 above plot 82 yields an ip3 that is worse than the vendor specifications while any value below plot 82 yields an ip3 that is better than the vendor specifications . plot 84 represents the change in the noise function ( nf ) as a function of the upfront gain . it is a downward sloping line from left to right . as the upfront gain increases the change in ( delta ) the noise figure decreases which is beneficial . since nf affects power it makes sense that the greater the upfront gain the greater the coverage area that can be served by the base station . increased power comes at a cost , however , as can be seen by the plot 86 of ip3 . plot 86 represents the change in the third order intercept ( ip3 ) as a function of the upfront gain . it is an upward sloping line from left to right . as the upfront gain increases the change in ( delta ) ip3 increases which is deleterious . since ip3 represents interference which affects capacity , it makes sense that the greater the upfront gain the greater the inter - modulation interference and thus , the worse the capacity that can be served by the base station . the dynamic range ( dr ) of the base station receiver is a function of the receiver &# 39 ; s noise floor and high level signal . noise floor depends on the noise figure ( nf ) while the high level signal is dependent on the third order intercept ( ip3 ). reducing ip3 results in a shortening of dynamic range . an increase in nf also results in a shortening of dynamic range . mathematically , a 1 db increase in nf corresponds to a ⅔ db decrease in ip3 meaning that a change in nf has a greater affect on dynamic range than a change in ip3 . however , since the present invention typically does not change either nf or ip3 by more than 1 db in either direction , the dynamic range ( dr ) is negligibly affected with respect to overall system performance . by studying all of the plots together it can be determined that any upfront gain greater than approximately ½ db will provide for an improved noise figure ( nf ) with respect to the vendor specifications . similarly , any gain value less than approximately 6 . 25 db will provide for an improved third order intercept ( ip3 ) with respect to the vendor specifications . now consider plots 88 and 90 which represent the standalone nf and standalone ip3 characteristics respectively . standalone characteristics refer to the nf and ip3 of a base station if it were not co - sited with another base station . naturally these values may be better than the vendor specifications since the design did not consider a signal that would be shared with another base station . the standalone nf plot 88 is a horizontal line with a y - axis value of approximately 0 . 75 . thus , co - siting base stations and providing an upfront gain values above approximately 4 db will start to reduce nf with respect to a standalone base station . the standalone ip3 plot 90 is a horizontal line with a y - axis value of approximately zero . thus , co - siting base stations and providing any upfront gain values will start to degrade ip3 performance with respect to a standalone base station . for the sake of completeness , we can plot the industry accepted standards of nf 92 and ip3 94 . as one might expect , these plots are the least restrictive to performance since the vendors generally build their products to tolerances that exceed industry standards . nevertheless , the plots do serve to provide a complete picture of overall system performance . plots 92 and 94 have been arbitrarily given y - axis values that reflect less restrictive standards than the vendor specification plots of nf 80 and ip3 82 . plots 84 and 86 provide a sliding scale of performance characteristics . it is clear that adding gain degrades ip3 performance but improves nf performance . each base station may have its own specific operating criteria with respect to coverage and capacity that will not be met by arbitrarily adding gain to match an expected value . the expected gain value could actually cause too much ip3 degradation for a coverage sensitive base station . while the extra gain may not degrade performance below industry specifications , it may degrade performance below vendor specifications . the plots of fig3 show that an upfront gain range between approximately 4 to 6 . 25 db will provide nf performance better than that of standalone while still maintaining ip3 performance within vendor specifications . higher gains will degrade ip3 performance beyond vendor specifications while lower gains will not meet standalone nf performance . the present invention is described herein in the context of a portable wireless communications device . as used herein , the term “ portable wireless communications device ” may include a cellular radiotelephone with or without a multi - line display ; a personal communications system ( pcs ) terminal that may combine a cellular radiotelephone with data processing , facsimile and data communications capabilities ; a pda that can include a radiotelephone , pager , internet / intranet access , web browser , organizer , calendar and / or a global positioning system ( gps ) receiver ; and a conventional laptop and / or palmtop receiver or other appliance that includes a radiotelephone transceiver . portable wireless communications devices may also be referred to as “ pervasive computing ” devices . the present invention may be embodied as cellular communication systems , methods , and / or computer program products . accordingly , the present invention may be embodied in hardware and / or in software ( including firmware , resident software , micro - code , etc .). furthermore , the present invention may take the form of a computer program product on a computer - usable or computer - readable storage medium having computer - usable or computer - readable program code embodied in the medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system . in the context of this document , a computer - usable or computer - readable medium may be any medium that can contain , store , communicate , propagate , or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system , apparatus , or device . the computer - usable or computer - readable medium may be , for example but not limited to , an electronic , magnetic , optical , electromagnetic , infrared , or semiconductor system , apparatus , device , or propagation medium . more specific examples ( a nonexhaustive list ) of the computer - readable medium would include the following : an electrical connection having one or more wires , a portable computer diskette , a random access memory ( ram ), a read - only memory ( rom ), an erasable programmable read - only memory ( eprom or flash memory ), an optical fiber , and a portable compact disc read - only memory ( cd - rom ). note that the computer - usable or computer - readable medium could even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed , as the program can be electronically captured , via , for instance , optical scanning of the paper or other medium , then compiled , interpreted , or otherwise processed in a suitable manner , if necessary , and then stored in a computer memory . in the following claims , any means - plus - function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures . therefore , it is to be understood that the foregoing is illustrative of the present invention and is not to be construed as limited to the specific embodiments disclosed , and that modifications to the disclosed embodiments , as well as other embodiments , are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims . the invention is defined by the following claims , with equivalents of the claims to be included therein .