with reference to fig1 a first embodiment of a system for communicating information on the internet will now be described . in fig1 a set of end user terminals or stations usr 1 to usrn are connected to a multiplexing unit 10 , which may be a modem pool or a lan router depending on the type of user system . the multiplexing unit 10 is connected to an interceptor 20 which , in turn , is connected to an internet first switching point 30 providing access to the internet 50 , said first switching point 30 generally being located at the premises of an internet service provider . the multiplexing unit 10 multiplexes the communications to and from the user terminals usr 1 to usrn . according to this system , a user usr 1 wishing to access information provided for example as a world wide web homepage or site by an internet information content provider 60 , located at a original site of publication somewhere on the internet 50 , generally sends an information request , specifically a http request to the www - port , via the multiplexing unit 10 to the internet first switching point 30 , where the request is routed out on the internet 50 to finally reach the content provider 60 . the content provider 60 then answers the request , sending the requested information via the internet 50 back to the user usr 1 . however , according to the first embodiment of the invention shown in fig1 the information request from a user usr 1 to usrn is intercepted by the interceptor 20 before it reaches the first switching point 30 . the information request is then examined by the interceptor , which decides whether or not the requested information , for example the information provided by the content provider 60 , exist in a copy or similar form on a local server 40 , often called a “ mirror server ”, arranged in direct communication with the interceptor 20 . if a copy or the like of the requested information provided by the content provider 60 is stored at the local server 40 , the request from the user is re - routed to the server 40 , which will then return the requested information to the user . however , if the interceptor determines that no copy or the like of the information of interest exists on the local server 40 , then the information request from the user usr 1 to usrn is sent on to the internet first switching point as in the conventional form of internet communication . note that the interceptor 20 only intercepts communication packages of certain specific types . for example , in fig1 only world wide web information requests from the users usr 1 to usrn is intercepted . other types of communication services , such as e - mail or the like , is left undisturbed by the interceptor 20 . if a request is re - routed to the server 40 , but the server 40 however is unable , perhaps temporarily , to answer the request due to some kind of failure or the like , or for example if the server only provides a copy of part of the information stored at the original content provider adress , said request refering to the “ uncopied ” part , the server is then arranged to pass on the request to the original content provider via the internet 50 unaffected , thereby making sure that the user will get the information requested also in these types of situations . also , the interceptor 20 is arranged so that the communication between the users usr 1 to usrn and the first switching point 30 bypasses the interceptor 20 in cases when the interceptor suffers from a failure , in order for the general communication to be left undisturbed in such cases . the system is arranged to update the information provided by the mirror server 40 . this can be performed in many ways , as is understood by those skilled in the art . in one example , the interceptor 20 or the mirror server 40 is arranged to update the server 40 at specific time intervals , for example once a day . as is clear , different bases stored on the mirror server 40 may need to be updated at different time intervals , depending on the rate that the information provided at the original content providers 60 is altered . according to another example , the content provider 60 may be provided with a specific updating service unit ( not shown ) which is arranged to send an updating signal to the mirror server 40 when the information provided by the original content provider 60 has been changed significantly , said change causing the service unit to decide that the mirror server need to be updated and hence send the updating signal , in respond to which the mirror server 40 is updated or performs an updating procedure . an exemplifying embodiment of the interceptor 20 shown in fig1 will now be described with reference to fig2 . in fig2 the interceptor 20 comprises a central processing or control unit 25 which generally receives information packages from the user or users and sends on information packages to the first switching point in fig1 . the interceptor 20 further comprises a memory 27 which stores a look up table comprising three lists a , b and c . the central processing unit 25 is hence also connected to the memory 27 and to the mirror server 40 in fig2 . the look up table in the form of the three lists a , b and c stored in the memory 27 provides information regarding which information that is to be found at which locations on the mirror server 40 . more specifically , list a provides information as to which internet content providers ( for example content provider 60 in fig1 ) are to be found in a copied or similar “ mirrored ” alternative form on the mirror server 40 , for example a set of the most frequented ip - addresses . further , list b provides information as to at which specific locations or addresses the respective mirrored sites is to be found on the mirror server 40 . finally , list c provides information as to which part or parts of the full content of the information provided by the different original content providers 60 that are , or are not , provided at the mirrored sites on the mirror server 40 , for example a list of url - patterns of files on these sites that for one reason or other is not mirrored . as is indicated by the arrows in fig2 each field in the respective lists is associated with a specific field in the other lists . for example , each ip - address in list a , referring to an original content provider 60 , is associated to an associated specific mirror or alternative address on the mirror server 40 in list b and to a specific field of url - patterns in list c that are not mirrored at the mirror site . an example of the operation of the interceptor 20 in fig1 and 2 will now be described . when the central processing unit 25 in the interceptor 20 receives or intercepts a message from a user , say usr 1 , it firstly checks if the message is of a type of interest , i . e . if the message relates to the kind of information type stored on the mirror server 40 , for example if the message is a ip world wide web request . if the message is not of the relevant type , for example if its a e - mail message , it is sent on directly to the first switching point 30 without being affected by the interceptor 20 . however , if the message is of a relevant type , i . e an ip www request , the central processing unit 25 accesses list a to determine whether or not the requested ip - address exist in list a , i . e . whether or not the requested ip - address exists in a mirrored form on the mirror server 40 . if the answer is no , i . e . if the request ip - address does not exist in list a , the request is sent on to the internet first switching point 30 . in such a case , the request is consequently left unaffected by the interceptor . however , if the answer is yes , i . e . if the request ip - address exists in list a , the central processing unit 25 accesses the associated field in list c to determine whether or not the entire content provider site is mirrored on the mirror server or , if not , whether or not the requested information relates to the part or parts of the content provider information which do exist in a mirrored form on the mirror server 40 . then , if the requested information relates to a part of the original content provider information which is determined not to exist on the mirror server 40 , the central processing unit sends the request to the internet first switching point 30 unaffected by the interceptor 20 . however , if the relevant information is determined to exist on the local mirror server 40 , the central processing unit 25 accesses the associated field in list b in the memory 27 to derive information as to the specific location address of said information on the mirror server 40 . the central processing unit 25 then sends the information request directly to this location address on the mirror server 40 , which in respond to said request provides the requested information back to the user usr 1 via the central processing unit 25 . as is understood by those skilled in the art , the structure and operation of the central processing unit 25 and the look up table in the memory 27 may be realized in many different ways , the invention not being limited to the one described herein . for example , parts of said list c may be provided at the mirror server ( not shown ), whereby a request relating to an address included in the list a is re - routed to the server independent of whether or not the requested part of the mirrored information actually exists on the server . if , in fact , it doesn &# 39 ; t , the server then simply sends the request along to the original content provider . in fig3 and 4 , for ease of description , elements corresponding to those already described with reference to fig1 and 2 will be designated with the same numerals , and description thereof is therefore omitted in the following . in fig3 another embodiment of a system according to the invention is shown , wherein the storing means 40 is comprised of a set of mirror servers 41 - 45 arranged in a hierarchic structure , instead of using a single server as shown in fig1 . if so desired , the separate mirror servers 41 - 45 may be arranged at different geographical or logical locations , thereby providing scaling and configuration flexibility . according to this embodiment , said list b of the interception memory 27 in fig2 is arranged to provide address information as to which server and which location thereon that is associated with the respective mirrored ip - addresses . in fig4 there is shown an embodiment of a system according to the invention , wherein two seperate user groups , usr 1 , usr 2 , . . . , usrn and usr 1 ′, usr 2 ′, . . . , usrn ′, are serviced by seperate interceptors 20 and 20 ′, respectively , via multiplexing devices 10 and 10 ′, respectively . the intercepting means is hence comprised of two ( or more ) identical interceptors 20 , 20 ′, each serving different user groups but making use of the same set of mirror servers 41 - 43 . the respective interceptors 20 , 20 ′ communicates with the different mirror servers 41 - 43 via a high speed switch 70 . in this embodiment , the interceptors 20 and 20 ′ are both connected to the same internet first switching point 30 . however , the interceptors 20 , 20 ′ could just as well be connected to different internet first switching points but still be using the same set of memory servers 41 - 43 . according to this embodiment , an incoming request from a user is directed to the respective interceptor 20 , 20 ′ which re - routes , if so decided , the request to the relevant mirror server 41 - 43 via the high speed switch 70 or sends the request unaffected to the first switching point 30 . the possibility to use several interceptors in the described manner further enhances the scaleability of a system according to the invention . it is understood that the construction and function of the separate elements described with reference to the drawings will become apparent for those skilled in the art . even though the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplifying embodiments , many different alterations , modifications and the like will become apparent for those skilled in the art . the described embodiments are therefore not intended to limit the scope of the invention , as defined by the appended claims .