the prior art system illustrated in fig1 includes power supply 10 and load 30 represented by resistor rl . power supply 10 outputs to path 11 a voltage level derived as a function of an externally supplied preset voltage level , v set , which may be established via one of a number of different conventional ways , e . g ., programming , zener diode , precision bridge , etc . path 11 may include distributed resistance ( represented in the fig . by resistor 20 also designated rd ) which decrease the level of the voltage that supply 10 provides to load 30 . the actual level of the voltage that is supplied to load 30 is sensed in a conventional way and fed via path 12 to one input of instrumentation amplifier 40 , whose gain is set by the value of resistor rg . amplifier 40 compares the sensed voltage level with the preset voltage level , v set , that is supplied to another input of amplifier 40 . amplifier 40 then outputs to voltage generator 50 an error signal that is indicative of the difference between the level of the sensed voltage and preset voltage . voltage generator 50 , in a conventional manner , changes the level of the voltage signal that it is supplying to path 11 with respect to ground . for example , if the sensed voltage is lower ( higher ) than the preset voltage , then generator 50 increases ( decreases ) the level of the voltage signal that it is outputting to path 11 . an equilibrium is reached when the level of the sensed voltage equals the level of the preset voltage , v set . this voltage regulation scheme may be applied in a conventional manner to a system having redundant power supplies , as shown in fig2 in which each of the power supplies 100 and 200 are similar to power supply 10 of fig1 . also , voltage supply paths 211 and 212 extending to load 130 ( represented by rl 2 ) may similarly include some distributed resistance respectively represented by resistors rd 21 and rd 22 . diodes d 21 and d 22 provide an or function as well as isolating power supplies 100 and 200 from one another . the level of voltage supplied to load 130 via path 121 with respect to ground is sensed by sense paths 213 and 214 respectively connected to supplies 100 and 200 in the manner shown in fig1 . as discussed above , power supply 100 adjusts the level of the voltage that it is outputting across path 211 and ground as a function of the difference between the levels of the sensed voltage level supplied via path 21 ( sense 21 ) and preset voltage vset 21 . power supply 200 operates similarly with respect to the sensed voltage level supplied via path 214 ( sense 22 ) and preset voltage vset 22 . we have recognized that a problem arises when the values of the preset voltages , vset 21 and vset 22 have approximately the same nominal value , but do not actually equal one another . specifically , the power supply connected to the higher preset voltage level continues to increase the level of the voltage signal that it is supplying to load 130 until the level of the voltage at path 121 equals the higher preset voltage level . the power supply that is connected to the lower preset voltage level , on the other hand , continues to decrease the level of the voltage signal that it is supplying to load 130 as a way of attempting to match its preset voltage level with the voltage level supplied via sense path 214 . for example , assume that preset voltage vset 21 equals + 5 . 3 volts and preset voltage vset 22 equals + 5 . 2 volts . although the preset voltage levels nominally equal one another and are within a specified limit , power supply 100 will , nevertheless , increase its output to a point where the voltage supplied to load 130 equals + 5 . 3 . power supply 200 “ seeing ” that the sensed voltage of + 5 . 3 volts is greater than its preset voltage of + 5 . 2 volts decreases the level of its output voltage to drive the voltage that is being supplied to load 130 toward a value of + 5 . 2 volts . each time power supply 200 decreases the level of its output voltage the difference between the sensed voltage level and vset 22 increases . disadvantageously , power supply 200 continues to operate in this manner until the level of the voltage signal that it is outputting effectively reaches zero . at that point , monitor 400 may conclude that power supply 200 is not operating properly and may output an alarm message indicating that the power supply failed . a craftsperson responding to the message may then replace the supposedly failed power supply 200 . we have further recognized that the foregoing problem may be dealt with by forcing both power supplies to operate as expected . we do this , in accordance with an aspect of the invention , by “ tailoring ” the sensed voltage level that is supplied to a power supply to the preset voltage level that is connected to that power supply . such tailoring may be achieved , in accordance with another aspect of the invention , by sensing the voltage level at the load and at the output of a power supply using , for example , a voltage divider across a respective “ oring ” diode as is shown in fig3 . in this way , a voltage level with respect to ground will appear at the junction of resistors r 102 and r 103 ( r 202 and r 203 ) between the voltage level at 311 ( 312 ) and the voltage level at 321 . in effect , the difference between the voltage level at 311 ( 312 ) and voltage level at 321 will be the voltage drop across diode d 31 ( d 32 ). in an illustrative embodiment of the invention , diodes d 31 and d 32 are shottky diodes having a voltage drop in the range of , for example , 0 . 2 volts . thus , the sensed voltage is a value that is weighted in accordance with the values of the resistors forming the voltage divider , which , in accordance with an illustrative embodiment of the invention , equal one another and each may have a value of , e . g ., 100 , 000 ohms . with reference to fig3 the sensed voltage , vs 1 , supplied to supply 3100 may be expressed as follows : vs1 = ( r103 * v100 + r102 * vout ) r102 + r103 ( 1 ) where v 100 is the output voltage at power supply 3100 and vout is the voltage level at 321 . the sensed voltage supplied to power supply 3200 may be similarly expressed as follows : vs2 = ( r203 * v200 + r202 * vout ) r202 + r203 ( 2 ) where v 200 is the output voltage at power supply 3200 and , as mentioned above , vout is the voltage level at 321 . based on the foregoing , power supplies 3100 and 3200 may now independently adjust their respective output voltages , v 100 and v 200 , such that the sensed voltages supplied to those power may be adjusted to equal the respective preset voltage level , as will be shown below . thus , assume that the level of vset 100 is greater than the level of vset 200 . for that case we may express vset 31 as follows : vset 100 = ( r103 * v100 + r102 * vout ) r102 + r103   solving   for   vout   yields   the   following   expression  : ( 3 ) vout = ( r103  ( vset 100 - v100 ) r102 + vset 100 ( 4 ) in general , vout and v 100 differ by an amount related to the voltage drop through oring diode d 31 , which may be , for example , a shottky diode . as is well known , the voltage drop , δ ( i ) across a shottky diode is approximately 200 mv . if we letting v 100 = δ ( i )+ vout , then the equation for vout may be re - written as follows : vout = vset 100 - δ  ( i ) * r103 r102 + r103 ( 5 ) it is noted that v out will be somewhat less than the setpoint v set100 . for the case where r 102 = r 103 , the difference should be approximately 100 mv . increasing the resistance of r 102 will minimize this difference . the output voltage v 200 in terms of v 100 may be determined starting with the following expression : ( r102 + r103 ) * vset 100 - r102 * v100 r102 = ( r202 + r203 ) * vset 200 - r202 * v200 r202 ( 6 ) if the values of all of the resistors are equal , then ( 6 ) may be expressed as follows : if vset 100 = vset 200 + δ , then v 200 in ( 7 ) may be expressed as follows : thus , as shown by equation ( 8 ), when the monitor of fig2 observes the outputs of power supplies 3100 and 3200 it will find that the voltage level v 200 will be slightly less than voltage level v 100 — differing by merely the twice the difference between the setpoints —, thereby confirming that power supply 3200 is operating properly , all in accordance with an aspect of the invention . it will thus be appreciated that , although the invention illustrated herein is described in the context of a specific illustrative embodiment , those skilled in the art will be able to devise numerous alternative arrangement which , although , not explicitly shown or described herein , nevertheless , embody the principles of the invention and are within its spirit and scope .