with reference to fig1 and 2 , the reference numeral 10 refers , in general , to a human vertebral column 10 . the lower portion of the vertebral column 10 is shown and includes the lumbar region 12 , the sacrum 14 , and the coccyx 16 . the flexible , soft portion of the vertebral column 10 , which includes the thoracic region and the cervical region , is not shown . the lumbar region 12 of the vertebral column 10 includes five vertebrae v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , v 4 and v 5 separated by intervertebral discs d 1 , d 2 , d 3 , and d 4 , with the disc d 1 extending between the vertebrae v 1 and v 2 , the disc d 2 extending between the vertebrae v 2 and v 3 , the disc d 3 extending between the vertebrae v 3 and v 4 , and the disc d 4 extending between the vertebrae v 4 and v 5 . the sacrum 14 includes five fused vertebrae , one of which is a superior vertebrae v 6 separated from the vertebrae v 5 by a disc d 5 . the other four fused vertebrae of the sacrum 14 are referred to collectively as v 7 . a disc d 6 separates the sacrum 14 from the coccyx 16 , which includes four fused vertebrae ( not referenced ). with reference to fig3 , the vertebrae v 5 includes two laminae 20 a and 20 b extending to either side ( as viewed in fig2 ) of a spinous process 22 that extends posteriorly from the juncture of the two laminae . two transverse processes 24 a and 24 b extend laterally from the laminae 20 a and 20 b , respectively . two articular processes 26 a and 26 b extend superiorly from the laminae 20 a and 20 b respectively , and two articular processes 28 a and 28 b extend inferiorly from the laminae 20 a and 20 b , respectively . the inferior articular processes 28 a and 28 b rest in the superior articular process of the vertebra v 2 to form a facet joint . since the vertebrae v 1 - v 4 are similar to the vertebrae v 5 , and since the vertebrae v 6 and v 7 are not involved in the present invention , they will not be described in detail . it will be assumed that , for one or more of the reasons set forth above , the vertebrae v 4 and v 5 are not being adequately supported by the disc d 4 , and that it is therefore necessary to provide supplemental support and stabilization of these vertebrae . to this end , and referring to fig4 a and 4b , a device according to an embodiment of the invention is shown , in general , by the reference numeral 40 and , for the purposes of example , is shown inserted between the spinous processes 22 of the vertebrae v 4 and v 5 . the device 40 consists of an enclosed frame 42 formed by four rod - like members 42 a - 42 d . the members 42 a and 42 b are generally v - shaped and extend opposite one another and the members 42 c and 42 d are generally v - shaped and extend opposite one another . the member 42 a extends between the corresponding ends of the members 42 c and 42 d , and the member 42 b extends between the other ends of the members 42 c and 42 d . preferably , the corresponding ends of the members 42 a - 42 d are formed integrally and a notch is formed between their respective ends to permit slight pivotal movement between the members . each member 42 a - 42 d is generally v - shaped , with a notch being formed at the apex of the v to permit pivotal movement . as a result of their v - shaped configuration , each member 42 a and 42 b defines a saddle for receiving a process 22 . a retaining member , in the form of a cable tie , or an adjustable strap , 44 extends around the frame 42 and is oriented in the above - mentioned horizontal plane , i . e ., in a direction transverse to the axis of the vertebral column 10 ( fig1 and 2 ). in fig8 a , the tie 74 is relatively loose around the members 42 c and 42 d , and , when tightened , linear forces are applied to the members in the directions shown by the arrows in fig4 a as will be described in detail . it is understood that the linear forces exerted by the tie 74 can be adjusted in small increments in the same manner as a conventional cable tie , or by any other appropriate retaining device ( not shown ). the device 40 is initially inserted between the processes 22 with the tie 74 loosely fitting around the frame 42 as shown in fig4 a and 5a . in this position the device 40 easily fits between the processes 22 , and the processes generally extend in the above - mentioned saddles in a relatively loose arrangement , i . e ., they are not pressed against the device with any appreciable force . the surgeon then tightens the tie 44 around the members 42 c and 42 d as needed to apply an inwardly - directed linear , compressive force to the frame 42 in a plane transverse to the axis of the frame 42 , i . e ., in the directions shown by the arrows in fig4 a . this causes an articulation , or pivotal movement , of the members 42 a - 42 d about the notches discussed above , and the frame 42 is deformed to the position of fig4 b . this selective deformation causes the dimension of the frame 42 in a plane transverse to the axis of the vertebral column 10 , i . e ., a horizontal plane as viewed in the drawings , to be decreased , while its dimension in the plane of the latter column , i . e ., a vertical plane , is increased . thus , the surfaces of the members 42 a and 42 b defining the saddles press against the process 22 with sufficient force to lock , or retain , the device 40 in the inserted position which is similar to the inserted position of the device 40 shown in fig5 b . the presence of the device 40 prevents the collapse of the intervertebral space between the adjacent vertebrae and thus stabilizes the vertebral column 10 . the flexible nature of the device 40 does not cause any damage to the processes 22 and absorbs shock that contributes to the dynamic stabilization of the vertebral column 10 . it can be appreciated that the tie 44 is strong enough to apply the force in the manner described above and to overcome the resistance of the frame 42 to cause the above movement . therefore , after the device 40 has been implanted in accordance with the above , it will stretch in response to movement of the anatomical structures , such as the processes in the above example , towards each other in response to certain movements of the patient , such as when he or she bends over . in this case , the device 40 can move back from its position shown in fig4 b and 5b towards the position of fig4 a and 5a . then , after the above movement on part of the patient , the tie 44 , and therefore the frame 42 , would move back to their normal position of fig4 b and 5b . alternately , the tie 44 can be relatively rigid ( as opposed to stretchable ) and the frame members 42 a - 42 d can be stretchable so as to move in response to the above movement of the anatomical structures . is also understood the device 40 does not necessarily have to function as an implant as described in the example above , but rather can be used in other different procedures . for example , it can be inserted between the structures , and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts , or moves , the structures in a direction away from each other , to permit another device , such as a prosthesis , to be implanted between the structures or in an area near the structures . according to another example , the device 40 can be inserted between the structures and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts the structures to permit another surgical procedure to be performed in the space formed by the distraction . in each of these examples the device 40 would be released and removed after the procedure is completed . the embodiment of fig6 a and 6b is identical to that of fig5 a and 5b and includes components of the latter embodiment , which components are given the same reference numerals . according to the embodiment of fig6 a and 6b , a device 50 is provided that is identical to the device 40 of the embodiment of fig4 a and 4b , with the exception that the tie 74 of the latter embodiment is replaced by a cable 54 that extends over and around the members 42 c and 42 d of the frame 42 . the end portions of the cable 54 extend through a retaining device 56 to enable the cable to be tightened as necessary to apply linear compressive forces to the frame as shown by the arrows in fig6 a , and held in this tightened position . the device 50 is initially inserted between the processes 22 with the cable 54 loosely fitting around the member 42 as shown in fig6 a . in this position , the device 50 easily fits between the processes 22 , and the processes generally extend in the saddles defined by the members 42 a and 42 b in a relatively loose arrangement , i . e ., they are not pressed against the device with any appreciable force . the surgeon then tightens the cable 54 to cause an articulation , or pivotal movement , of the members 42 a - 42 d about the notches discussed above in the directions shown by the arrows in fig7 a , and the frame 42 is deformed to the position of fig7 b . this selective deformation causes the dimension of the frame 42 in a plane transverse to the axis of the vertebral column 10 to be decreased , while its dimension in the plane of the latter column is increased . thus , the surfaces of the members 42 a and 42 b defining the saddles press against the processes 22 with sufficient force to lock or retain the device 50 in the inserted position which is similar to the inserted position of the device 40 shown in fig5 b . the presence of the device 50 prevents the collapse of the intervertebral space between the adjacent vertebrae and thus stabilizes the vertebral column 10 . the flexible nature of the device 50 does not cause any damage to the processes 22 and absorbs shock that contributes to the dynamic stabilization of the vertebral column 10 . it can be appreciated that the cable 54 is strong enough to apply the force in the manner described above and to overcome the resistance of the frame 42 to cause the above movement . however , the cable 54 can also have some stretchability , not unlike that of a strong rubber band . therefore , after the device 50 has been implanted in accordance with the above , it will stretch in response to movement of the anatomical structures , such as the processes in the above example , towards each other in response to certain movements of the patient , such as when he or she bends over . in this case , the device 50 can move back from its position shown in fig6 b towards the position of fig6 a . then , after the above movement on part of the patient , the cable 54 , and therefore the frame 42 , would move back to their normal position of fig6 b . alternately , the cable 54 can be relatively rigid ( as opposed to stretchable ) and the frame members 42 a - 42 d can be stretchable so as to move in response to the above movement of the anatomical structures . it is also understood the device 50 does not necessarily have to function as an implant as described in the example above , but rather can be used in other different procedures . for example , it can be inserted between the structures , and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts , or moves the structures in a direction away from each other , to permit another device , such as a prosthesis , to be implanted between the structures or in an area near the structures . according to another example , the device 50 can be inserted between the structures and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts the structures to permit another surgical procedure to be performed in the space formed by the distraction . in each of these examples the device 40 would be released and removed after the procedure is completed . the embodiment of fig7 a and 7b is identical to that of fig4 a and 4b and includes components of the latter embodiment , which components are given the same reference numerals . according to the embodiment of fig7 a and 7b , a device 60 is provided that is identical to the device 50 of the embodiment of fig6 a and 6b , with the exception that the tie 54 of the latter embodiment is replaced by a bolt 64 and a nut 66 . the bolt 64 extends from the member 42 d and through the member 42 c , and the nut 66 extends outside the frame 42 and is threaded on the threaded end portion of the bolt . thus , when torque is applied to the nut 66 to tighten it over the bolt 64 , an inwardly - directed linear force is applied to the frame 42 in the directions shown by the arrows in fig7 a , i . e ., in a plane transverse to the axis of the frame 42 . the device 60 is initially inserted between the processes 22 in the position shown in fig8 a , with the bolt 64 and the nut 66 exerting little , or no force on the frame 42 . in this position the device 60 easily fits between the processes 22 and the processes generally extend in the saddles formed by the frame members 42 a and 42 b in a relatively loose arrangement , i . e ., they are not pressed against the member with any appreciable force . the surgeon then tightens the nut 66 on the bolt 64 , creating a linear compressive force in the directions shown by the arrows in fig7 a , sufficient to cause an articulation , or pivotal movement , of the members 42 a - 42 d about the notches discussed above . this selective movement causes the dimension of the frame 42 in a plane transverse to the axis of the vertebral column 10 to be decreased , while its dimension in the plane of the latter column is increased . thus , the surfaces of the members 42 a and 42 b defining the above - mentioned saddles press against the processes 22 with sufficient force to lock or retain the device 60 in the position of fig7 b which is similar to the inserted position of the device 50 shown in fig5 b . the presence of the device 60 prevents the collapse of the intervertebral space between the adjacent vertebrae and thus stabilizes the vertebral column 10 . the flexible nature of the device 60 does not cause any damage to the processes 22 and absorbs shock that contributes to the dynamic stabilization of the vertebral column 10 . it is understood that the frame members 42 a - 42 d can also have some stretchability , as discussed above , so as to permit movement of the anatomical structures , such as the processes in the above example , towards each other in response to certain movements of the patient , such as when he or she bends over . therefore , after the device 60 has been implanted in accordance with the above , the frame 42 will stretch in response to the load caused by the above movement of the anatomical structures , so that the device can move somewhat from its position shown in fig7 b . after the above movement , the frame 42 , would move back to its normal position of fig7 b . it is also understood the device 60 does not necessarily have to function as an implant as described in the example above , but rather can be used in other different procedures . for example , it can be inserted between the structures , and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts , or moves the structures in a direction away from each other , to permit another device , such as a prosthesis , to be implanted between the structures or in an area near the structures . according to another example , the device 60 can be inserted between the structures and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts the structures to permit another surgical procedure to be performed in the space formed by the distraction . in each of these examples the device 40 would be released and removed after the procedure is completed . referring to fig8 a and 8b , an intervertebral disc prosthetic device according to an embodiment of the invention is shown , in general , by the reference numeral 70 and is also designed to be inserted between two anatomical structures , such as the spinous processes 22 of the vertebrae v 4 and v 5 . the device 70 consists of a member 72 having a generally rectangular shape with two end walls 72 a and 72 b , two side walls 72 c and 72 d , an upper wall 72 e and a lower wall ( not shown ). the member is fabricated from a material that is characterized by the following . the side walls 72 c and 72 d are relatively stiff so as to resist any deformation when a load is applied to the walls , as will be described . the two end walls 72 a and 72 b are relatively flexible so that they can expand in a manner to be described . the upper wall 72 e and the opposite lower wall ( not shown ) are adapted to contract in a horizontal plane , as viewed in the drawings in the direction indicated by the arrows in fig8 a , but are adapted to resist any expansion and contraction in a vertical plane extending perpendicular to the latter horizontal plane . this can be achieved in many ways , such as by adding relatively strong fibers in the material of the member 72 and orienting the fibers in a manner to permit the above contraction and resistance , or by forming the upper wall 72 e and the lower wall with vertically extending bellows . a retaining member , in the form of a cable tie , or an adjustable strap , 74 extends around the member 72 and is oriented in the above - mentioned horizontal plane , i . e ., in a direction transverse to the axis of the vertebral column 10 ( fig1 and 2 ). in fig8 a , the tie 74 is relatively loose around the frame 42 , and , when tightened , a radial force is applied to the member in the direction shown by the arrows in fig4 a to move the member 72 to a vertically expanded position , such as the one shown in fig8 b . it is understood that the radial force exerted by the tie 74 can be adjusted in small increments in the same manner as a conventional cable tie , or by any other appropriate retaining device ( not shown ). thus , when the tie 74 is tightened around the member 72 , the relatively stiff walls 74 c and 74 d , the relatively flexible walls 72 a and 72 b , the wall 72 e and the lower wall ( not shown ) opposite the wall 72 c causes the member to expand in a vertical plane and contract in a horizontal place , as viewed in the drawings , as it moves from its position of fig8 a to the position of fig8 b . thus , the member 72 responds in a manner similar to that of the frame 42 in the previous embodiments as it moves to the position of fig8 b , in which it prevents the collapse of the intervertebral space between the adjacent vertebrae and thus stabilizes the vertebral column 10 . the flexible nature of the device 70 absorbs shock which contributes to the dynamic stabilization of the vertebral column 10 . it can be appreciated that the tie 74 is strong enough to apply the force in the manner described above and to overcome the resistance of the member 42 to cause the above movement . however , the tie 74 can also have some stretchability , not unlike that of a strong rubber band . therefore , after the device 70 has been implanted in accordance with the above , it will stretch in response to movement of the anatomical structures , such as the processes in the above example , towards each other in response to certain movements of the patient , such as when he or she bends over . in this case , the device 70 can move back from its position shown in fig8 b towards the position of fig8 a . then , after the above movement on part of the patient , the tie 74 , and therefore the member 72 , would move back to their normal position of fig8 b . alternately , the tie 74 can be relatively rigid ( as opposed to stretchable ) and the members 72 can be stretchable so as to move in response to the above movement of the anatomical structures . is also understood the device 70 does not necessarily have to function as an implant as described in the example above , but rather can be used in other different procedures . for example , it can be inserted between the structures , and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts , or moves the structures in a direction away from each other , to permit another device , such as a prosthesis , to be implanted between the structures or in an area near the structures . according to another example , the device 70 can be inserted between the structures and vertically expanded to an extent that it engages and distracts the structures to permit another surgical procedure to be performed in the space formed by the distraction . in each of these examples the device 40 would be released and removed after the procedure is completed . it is understood that variations may be made in the foregoing without departing from the invention and examples of some variations are as follows : ( 1 ) the insertions of the devices 40 , 50 , 60 and 70 between the spinous processes , as disclosed above , was disclosed above only for the purpose of example , and it is understood that the devices can be used in connection with other anatomical structures . ( 2 ) the frame in one or more of the above embodiments can be rigid and standard hinges can be provided in place of the notches described above to permit the articulating movement . ( 3 ) the devices 40 , 50 , 60 and 70 can be inserted between two vertebrae following a corpectomy in which at least one vertebrae is removed . ( 4 ) other techniques , such as a ratchet arrangement or a rack and pinion arrangement can be used for applying the forces to the frame 42 and the member 72 . ( 5 ) the frame 42 and the member 72 can be oriented perpendicular to the spinous process rather than parallel as shown in the drawings . ( 6 ) another member of a different shape can replace the frame 42 or the member 72 . ( 7 ) the particular location of the devices 40 , 50 , 60 and 70 in the human anatomy can be varied . ( 8 ) any spatial references made above , such as “ under ”, “ over ”, “ between ”, “ upper ”, “ lower ”, “ top ”, “ bottom ”, etc . are for the purpose of illustration only and do not limit the specific orientation or location of the structure described above . the preceding specific embodiments are illustrative of the practice of the invention . it is to be understood , therefore , that other expedients known to those skilled in the art or disclosed herein , may be employed without departing from the invention or the scope of the appended claims , as detailed above . in the claims , means - plus - function clauses are intended to cover the structures described herein as performing the recited function and not only structural equivalents but also equivalent structures . thus , although a nail and a screw may not be structural equivalents in that a nail employs a cylindrical surface to secure wooden parts together , whereas a screw employs a helical surface , in the environment of fastening wooden parts , a nail and a screw are equivalent structures .