fig1 depicts a schematic representation of a check weigher 10 . the check weigher 10 includes a weighing device 12 with a weight - sensitive zone 14 and a connected evaluation unit 16 . in particular , the evaluation unit 16 can be configured on the basis of a microprocessor . other standard components of the check weigher 10 , e . g ., a display and input device , are omitted from fig1 for the sake of clarity . objects 18 a - c of different sizes , which are to be subjected to the check weighing , are conveyed to the weighing device 12 by a conveyor belt 20 which has a plurality of sections 20 a - 20 c and are led away . the center conveyor - belt section 20 b in fig1 is supported on the weight - sensitive zone 14 of the weighing device 12 . from this , it follows that the weighing device 12 can weigh an object ( 18 b in fig1 ) that is located in conveyor - belt section 20 b . a light barrier arrangement 21 , which is provided in section 20 a of the conveyor belt , can help determine the sizes of the objects 18 a - c before their weighing . in the depicted embodiment , the light barrier arrangement 21 is designed so that both the object height and a length in the conveying direction can be determined . also possible are other variants in which fewer or more size parameters are detected . rather than making a true size measurement , it is also possible to read and evaluate a marking , e . g ., a bar code or a transponder , that is attached to the objects and contains size information , possibly through a connected database , using a suitable reader . as indicated by the arrow 22 , object 18 b moves in the conveying direction at the conveying speed during the weighing . during this period in which object 18 b is located on conveyor - belt section 20 b , the weight - sensitive zone 14 of the weighing device 12 , which in particular can comprise an a / d converter , supplies a sequence of n individual measured weight values e 1 , e 2 , . . . e n at regular intervals , i . e ., specifically at the converter frequency . this sequence of individual measured weight values represents a time - varying measuring signal in which the measured value caused by the weight of object 18 b is superimposed by signals that must be ascribed to the aforementioned interference quantities . to cleanse the signal of these interfering signals , it is sent through a cascade of mean value filters , as illustrated schematically in the top part of fig2 . in the illustrated embodiment , the filter cascade contains a sequence of five mean - value generators of different filter lengths connected in series . each mean - value generator comprises a shift register , which is capable of storing one of the number of input values corresponding to the filter length . as soon as the register is filled , a mean value is generated out of the stored individual values and outputted as a first output value . each new input value into the shift register replaces the oldest stored value and triggers the calculation of a new mean value of the single values currently contained in the memory and outputs this as the next output value . the resulting sequence of output mean values of the first mean - value generator is read into the second mean - value generator , which works according to the same principle but can have a different filter length . the values pass through the entire cascade in this manner , so that a filtered sequence of resulting weight values , indicated with g in fig2 , is produced . as an alternative to this , it is also possible to arrange the filter cascade so that a single resulting weight value results . this can be achieved , for example , ( i ) by suitably combining , e . g ., averaging , a value sequence leaving the last filter , ( ii ) by selecting a single value from the output sequence of the last filter , or ( iii ) by having the filter cascade work batch - by - batch , rather than by the principle of the “ rolling window ” described above , thereby reducing the number of forwarded values in each filter stage . the individual filter stages , which are designated with the reference characters 24 a - e in fig2 , are schematically illustrated as blocks of different lengths , symbolizing their respectively different filter lengths . in the example of fig2 , it is assumed in particular that the individual filter stages 24 a - e stand in a ratio of 3 : 2 : 4 : 5 : 1 to one another , a ratio that in fig2 is indicated by way of the symbols σ3 , σ2 , σ4 , σ5 , σ1 . expressed in absolute numbers , a filter - length ratio of 12 : 8 : 16 : 20 : 4 to the values to be averaged is a favorable choice in practice . the concrete further use of the resulting weight value or values g is adapted as required to the particulars of the individual case . for example , a target weight of object 18 b can be considered as achieved if a sequence of resulting weight values g overshoots and undershoots a predefined weight threshold a particular number of times . in cases in which a single resulting weight value g is calculated , this value can be compared with one or a plurality of predefined weight threshold values , for thereby controlling a subsequent sorting system ( not illustrated in the figures ). the special use of the resulting weight value or values g is not the subject matter of the present invention . the lower portion of fig2 schematically illustrates a mechanism that adapts to changes in the object length . in the depicted example , it is assumed that , due to a batch change between object 18 b and object 18 a , the object length l shortens from an initial object length l 0 by a factor of 0 . 8 to l = 0 . 8 * l 0 . the light barrier arrangement 21 detects this change and transmits it to the evaluation unit 16 . this unit , in turn , changes the filter lengths of filter stages 24 a - e . this change is made for all filter stages 24 a - e to the same extent , i . e ., with the same , preferably linear , dependence , although it is also possible to implement nonlinear dependencies . in the depicted example of fig2 , a particularly advantageous dependence of the scaling value on the factor describing the change in length is realized , namely a directly proportional dependence . as illustrated in the lower portion of fig2 , the filter lengths of the individual filter stages 24 a - e are each lengthened absolutely in the result , but their relative ratio to one another is retained . this means that the filter lengths still stand in the ratio 3 : 2 : 4 : 5 : 1 to one another . this leads to essentially the same weighing result for identical objects 18 a - c , as symbolized by the resulting weight value g . this is a consequence of the fact that a linear scaling of the filter lengths of a cascade does not essentially change the basic shape of the transmission function of the filter cascade , but rather influences only its position and width . fig3 schematically represents a preferred method for setting a starting set - up of filter lengths of the cascade . to this end , the individual measured weight values e 1 , e 2 , . . . e n of an object 18 b are generated in the manner described above and stored in a ring buffer with n memory locations . then the stored value sequence is repeatedly fed into the filter cascade with the filter lengths of the individual filter stages 24 a - e being varied in each repetition step , which leads to different resulting weight values or value sequences g , g ′, g ″, g ′″ . . . . in other words , the actual weighing of a plurality of objects 18 a , 18 b , 18 c , . . . is replaced by the repeated filtering of the value sequence for object 18 b that has been measured once . as soon as the resulting weight value or values have the expected and desired characteristics for the ( known ) object 18 b , the setting process can be concluded and the filter set - up that has been found for the succeeding operation can be taken over in the manner explained . the embodiments discussed in the special description and depicted in the figures represent only illustrative embodiments of the present invention . in light of the local disclosure , a wide spectrum of variation possibilities is available to the person skilled in the art . in particular , the number and arrangement of the filter stages of the cascade can be adapted to the particular case presented . it is also possible to use cascades with different sections , of which only one or a few sections follow the variation principle explained above , and one or a plurality of other sections remain constant , independently of the conveying speed or object size . the latter is particularly meaningful if it is known that interferences superimpose the measurement independently of object speed and size . the above description of the preferred embodiments has been given by way of example . from the disclosure given , those skilled in the art will not only understand the present invention and its attendant advantages , but will also find apparent various changes and modifications to the structures and methods disclosed . the applicant seeks , therefore , to cover all such changes and modifications as fall within the spirit and scope of the invention , as defined by the appended claims , and equivalents thereof .