the invention is explained below based on a preferred embodiment . however , for a better understanding , a standard configuration of a network containing a tandem connection trail with possible switching is depicted in fig1 . a unidirectional tandem connection trail is established between network element a ( ne a ) and network element f ( ne f ), with ne a holding the tandem connection source function and ne f holding the tandem connection sink function . the sub - network connection between ne a and ne f is protected . the worker sub - network connection is via ne b - ne c - ne d ( signal a ), the protection one via ne e ( signal b ). the protection mechanism is “ sublayer monitored sub - network connection protection ” ( snc / s ) which is based on the result of tandem connection non - intrusive monitoring trail termination sink functions for each of the two sub - network connections ( sncs ). in case of a protection switch operation the tandem connection sink function will receive signal b instead of signal a as before . data signals which are routed through the network using different routes will experience different run times caused by the transfer delay on the optical fibre or the cable on the one hand and by the processing time in the different network elements on the other . therefore the two signals will arrive with different phases at a common point ( here : input of the protection switch selector at ne f ). it should be noted that 1 km of cable or optical fibre gives about 5 us of transfer delay . in a protected ring architecture , the short route can be between two adjacent nodes , whereas the long route may include all other nodes in the ring . in typical applications the phase difference may be in the range of several sdh / sonet frame lengths . in the following text , only the sdh notation ( vc ) is used . fig2 shows the signals a and b with a phase difference t of more than one frame length between the two signals . the signals contain the vc frames (. . . , x − 2 , x − 1 , x , x + 1 , x + 2 , . . . ). switching from a short route to a longer route very likely results in the reception of a number of frames for a 2nd time , whereas switching from a long to a shorter route often causes a loss of a number of frames . this has certain consequences at the tandem connection sink function . the operation of a tandem connection trail at the tandem connection sink is based on a standardized protocol . this protocol requires to check a frame alignment signal ( fas ) contained in the n 1 / n 2 bytes . the frame alignment signal ( fas ) is defined as a “ 1111 1111 1111 1110 ” bit pattern in frame 1 to 8 of the 76 frames tandem connection multiframe as shown in fig5 and 6 . the process of checking a multiframe alignment is shown in fig3 . the multiframe alignment is found based on searching for the frame alignment signal ( fas ) pattern within the bits 7 to 8 of the byte n 1 / n 2 . in the in multiframe ( im ) state , i . e . the state of a correct signal transmission , the signal is checked continuously at the presumed multiframe start position for the alignment . however , the frame alignment is deemed to have been lost ( entering out of multiframe ( oom ) state ) when two consecutive frame alignment signal ( fas ) are detected in error . frame alignment is deemed to be recovered , i . e . entering the in multiframe ( im ) state , when one non - errored frame alignment signal ( fas ) is found at any position . a protection switch operation in front of the tandem connection sink function will likely cause a loss or duplication of n 1 / n 2 bytes at the tandem connection sink due to the different signal delays explained above . this causes the alignment process to leave the in multiframe state , i . e . to enter an out of multiframe oom state , as the correct length of the tandem connection multiframe structure is disturbed and the frame alignment signal ( fas ) will no longer be found at the presumed multiframe start position . the out of multiframe ( oom ) state then is interpreted as loss of tandem connection defect ( dltc ), which causes consequent actions like an all - ones insertion . as a consequence the egressing signal is overwritten with all - ones until the im state is entered again . fig4 shows the dependencies and time sequences of the generated defect caused by the protection switch . the sequence im ( t im = max . 19 ms / 76 ms )→ oom ( t oom = max . 9 . 5 ms / 38 ms )→ im needs about t all = max . 28 . 5 ms for tandem connection signals based on a 125 microsecond vc frame ( vc - 4 , vc - 4 - xc and vc - 3 ) and about t all = max . 114 ms for tandem connection signals based on a 500 microseconds vc frame ( vc - 2 , vc - 12 and vc - 11 ). this means that the outgoing signal is disturbed again about t im ( max . 19 / 76 ms ) after a protection switch activity that restored traffic for about t oom ( max . 9 . 5 / 38 ms ). this disturbance would not exist if there would be no tandem connection trail established . to avoid extended signal disturbances e . g . as the above described ones , it is necessary according to the invention to change the tandem connection sink processes such that data delay differences caused by protection switches will no longer result in a traffic interruption due to a loss of tandem connection defect ( dltc ). with this approach , the inventive improvement is effective mainly in cases of manual or forced protection switches . in those cases the signal interruption caused by the switching action is very short ( less than 10 ms ) and the multiframe itself was not disturbed before the switching process . in cases in which the multiframe is lost before the switching action is initiated ( e . g . ssf , tc - uneq ) the advantage of the described solution is smaller . in the invention , the multiframe alignment process is changed such that data delay differences caused by switching actions do not longer result in detection of the dltc defect with accompanied all ones insertion . to achieve this , the out of multiframe ( oom ) state is detected as currently defined ( see fig3 ), but the dltc defect is no longer directly coupled with the detection of the oom state as it is state of the art . therefore the implementation described by the invention does not increase the possibility of an erroneously detected frame alignment signal . in the method of the invention the dltc defect will not be declared before a configurable timer has expired . this timer is started as soon as the oom state is entered and will be stopped as soon as the oom state is left due to the detection of a new multiframe alignment signal . only if the timer expires the dltc defect is declared and the all ones insertion becomes active . the interval length is configurable from 0 to 3 tandem connection multiframes . if a period of zero multiframes is chosen , the whole algorithm will behave as the current implementations . any other value bigger than zero will suppress the all ones insertion until the out of multiframe ( oom ) state was active for the selected interval length . in case of protection switches there will be transitions like im → oom → im , but the out of multiframe ( oom ) state is shorter than 2 tcm multiframes and the consequent action ‘ all - ones insertion ’ will therefore be suppressed , because a loss of tandem connection ( dltc ) signal won &# 39 ; t be set if the timer is set appropriately . a block diagram for this solution is shown in fig7 . a further inventive improvement is the suspension of the dtim defect in case of an oom state . the dtim defect is declared if the received trail trace identifier ( tti ) does not match an expected value for three consecutive multiframes . this will most likely be the case after a switching action because the time needed to regain frame alignment is two to three multiframes . if a dltc defect is declared , it takes three more undisturbed multiframes with matching trail trace identifier before the defect is cleared . as the consequence of the dtim defect is an all - ones insertion , three multiframes are overwritten during the realignment process . if the dtim detection is suspended during the oom state , no dtim defect is detected due to the protection switch action . therefore there is no extension of the signal interruption caused by the all - ones insertion , which is a consequent action to a detected dtim defect .