referring first to fig1 a , as mentioned above , prior to the present invention it was believed that for near vision the eye makes use of light entering the cornea through a central zone b having a diameter of about 3 mm . accordingly , most prior art techniques consist of ablating tissue at various depths in the cornea in a central zone b extending between 1 mm and about 3 mm . a small spot of about 1 mm is not ablated . more importantly , the annular zone c extending from about 5 mm to 10 + mm is not substantially ablated during this treatment . fig1 b shows a typical prior art profile resulting from central ablation . as can be seen in this profile , the central ablation is concentrated in the vicinity of the outer edge of zone b , i . e ., at about 3 mm . according to the present invention , the treatment should not be applied to the central zone of the cornea but to its outer peripheral zone . fig2 a shows a schematic view of the cornea with a central zone a of about 5 . 5 mm and an annular or peripheral zone b extending from 5 . 5 mm to 10 + mm . a typical profile 100 resulting from peripheral ablation in this peripheral zone b is shown diagrammatically in fig2 b . this ablation profile 100 is selected to steepen at least a portion of this peripheral zone b and correct the near vision of the patient for presbyopia and other near vision deficiencies . the size and shape of this ablation profile 100 is determined using standard techniques well known in the art and will not be discussed in detail , however in making the ablation the following patient characteristics are relevant : a . the pupillary size . an important advantage of the present invention is that a high refractive power peripheral cornea is obtained that allows more light to enter through the pupil . therefore the pupillary size of the patient is considered when deciding the depth of the peripheral ablation . b . the preoperative corneal curvature . the flatter the cornea is the deeper the treatment is required in order to achieve the desired level in which the peripheral power of the cornea corrects the presbyopia . c . the anterior chamber depth . this amount of light entering through the pupil is also dependent on the distance between the pupil and the peripheral cornea , where the ablation is performed . therefore this distance is also be considered . during peripheral ablation , the central zone a of the cornea is not subjected to any substantial treatment . however , during peripheral ablation , the optical characteristics of the central zone a may also change . therefore , during , or preferably after the peripheral ablation resulting in profile 100 , central ablation is applied to the central zone a to restore the vision of the patient through this central zone to what it was prior to the ablation profile 100 . fig2 c shows the profile 102 of the ablation applied to the central zone a . as discussed above , the inventors believe that this central zone a is responsible for distant vision which may be normal in a patient with presbyopia . alternatively , if the patient suffers from poor distant vision as well , and / or has other visual problems the ablation profile 102 may be shaped to correct these problems . it should be understood that in fig2 b and 2c the profiles 100 and 102 are shown schematically only to illustrate the approximate positions of these ablations and not necessarily their actual shape or size . [ 0035 ] fig3 shows a block diagram for an apparatus 10 arranged and constructed to perform the near vision treatment . the apparatus 10 may be adapted to perform either lasik or prk type of surgery . the apparatus 10 includes a laser beam generator 12 which generates a laser beam l . the laser beam generator 12 may be an excimer or a solid state laser generator . the laser beam l can be a broad beam , a scanning beam or a flying spot type beam and is directed by an optical network toward the eye e of a patient . the network may be manually adjusted using a manual control 14 to insure that the beam l is focused and directed properly on the cornea f . the apparatus further includes a keyboard 16 , an automated control 18 ( which is preferably is a microprocessor - based control ) and a profile memory 20 . the keyboard 16 is used to enter various information about the patient and the surgical operation that is to be performed . based on this information and other parameters programmed into it , the automated control selects an appropriate profile for the ablation to be performed . in other word , the automated control 18 relies on software to direct the laser beam precisely and determine the movements required to obtain the correct ablation depth , the number of zones for ablation and the diameter of ablation . a set of profiles for various vision problems may be stored in the profile memory 20 and the automated control 18 can access and retrieve these profiles as required . the automated control also operates the laser beam . the apparatus shown in fig3 may be implemented using laser equipment from autonomous technology , visx ( star 2 and star 3 ), laser sight , weavelight , alegretto , schwind , bausch and lomb , keracor and meditech aesculap . the procedure for performing ablation on a specific patient using the apparatus of fig3 is now described in conjunction with the flow chart of fig4 . in step 40 , the patient is examined to determine his current eye condition . for example a 55 - year old male was found to have plano distant vision and presbyopia . next , in step 42 it was determined that the treatment for patient &# 39 ; s presbyopia required a + 2 . 50 spherical diopter correction . as part of this determination , a complete optometric and ophthalmological examination is performed on the eye , including measurement of the corneal curvature , pupillary size , anterior chamber depth , topography map and ultrasound pachymetry . this information was fed to the automated control 18 which then determined the corresponding ablation profile required to generate the + 2 . 5 spherical diopter correction . in step 44 the ablation process was initiated and the automated control performed the necessary peripheral ablation on the cornea of the patient . since the + 2 . 5 diopter correction is rather drastic , in step 44 the peripheral ablation profile was performed in two phases . a peripheral ablation of + 1 . 5 spherical diopters was performed in the optical zone b from 6 . 0 to 9 . 0 mm . then a second peripheral ablation of + 1 . 50 diopters was performed in the optical zone b from 5 . 5 to 9 . 0 mm . the peripheral ablations are performed on the stromal tissues of the cornea . as discussed above , a peripheral ablation of the cornea may adversely affect the central zone of the cornea . therefore , in step 46 the optical characteristics of the eye are checked again . in step 48 a determination is made as to whether a correction is necessary for the central zone . for the subject patient , such a correction was necessary . therefore , the apparatus of fig3 was used to perform a central ablation to restore the optical characteristics of the central zone a . more specifically , in step 50 a central ablation of 42 microns centered on the pupil was performed . if the patient suffers from other visual impairments , such as hyperopia , additional or other treatment may be applied during this step 50 . [ 0040 ] fig5 shows a cross sectional view of the eye with peripheral ablation 100 positioned in a peripheral zone of the cornea in accordance with the present invention . in summary , using the method and apparatus described , a high refractive power peripheral cornea is produced by ablating a peripheral zone of the cornea extending from about 5 . 5 up to 10 mm or more without substantially changing the refractive power of a central zone of the cornea . the ablation steepens this peripheral zone to augment its dioptic power , thereby allowing the eye to focus on close objects without the use of a lens . during this process , the central zone of the cornea is not treated to insure that the distant vision remains unchanged . since the central zone is not touched during the peripheral ablation required to treat presbyopia , it need not be covered or otherwise protected . after the peripheral ablation is completed , the central zone may be ablated in order to revert it to its characteristics prior to the peripheral ablation . numerous modifications may be made to this invention without departing from its scope as defined in the appended claims .