in a radio system that can have multiple radar detectors , such as a point - to - multipoint and other configurations in the array of backhaul networks , the radar detectors become a shared network resource . embodiments of the invention make use of the shared resource by operating these detectors cooperatively , or in a coordinated manner , to perform the radar detection function efficiently and provide expanded capability such as channel look ahead , extended detection bandwidth , and more reliable detectability through location , angle , and antenna diversity . embodiments of the invention perform radar detection at the receiver side for the transmitter that occupies the channel at the same time the transmitter is sending . in some embodiments of the invention , the detector relays the results over a separate communications channel . this separate communications channel may be the part of an fdd link that operates in the other direction . the communication may also be indirect . for example , in some embodiments , communications may be attempted on a channel , and by virtue of not receiving a signal , it may be deduced that the channel is blocked due to radar detection . in another example , in some embodiments , a radar detector may transmit messages that a channel is clear on the channel , and , if radar is detected on the channel , the radar detector stops sending the messages from which it can be determined by transmitters that the channel is blocked due to radar detection . embodiments of the invention are also directed to operation of a radar detector in a full duplex system that transmits on the same channel at high duty factor so the detection is preferably performed remotely . this high - duty - factor system is able to determine the actual operating bandwidth required to be vacated in order to protect the detected radar . additionally , one or more radar detectors can be task - shared or time - shared so the detector or part of the detector can be reused while monitoring a high - duty - factor transmission system . an exemplary requirement for task sharing is to be able to use the same radar detector to perform monitoring of one channel while time - sharing the detector by performing an alternate channel cac on another channel at a low duty factor . a background cac may be performed for an alternate channel that can be used immediately in the event of a radar detection . this alternate channel detection is not disrupted by the adjacent or alternate channel operation of the occupied channel which may be operating at high duty factor . fig1 illustrates deployment of exemplary intelligent backhaul radio transceivers ( ibrs ) in accordance with an embodiment of the invention . as shown in fig1 , the ibrs 100 are deployable at street level with obstructions such as trees 104 , hills 108 , buildings 112 , etc . between them . the ibrs 100 are also deployable in configurations that include point to multipoint ( pmp ), as shown in fig1 , as well as point to point ( ptp ). in other words , each ibr 100 may communicate with more than one other ibr 100 . for 3g and especially for 4 th generation ( 4g ), cellular network infrastructure is more commonly deployed using “ microcells ” or “ picocells .” in this cellular network infrastructure , compact base stations ( enodebs ) 116 are situated outdoors at street level . when such enodebs 116 are unable to connect locally to optical fiber or a copper wireline of sufficient data bandwidth , then a wireless connection to a fiber “ point of presence ” ( pop ) requires obstructed los capabilities , as described herein . for example , as shown in fig1 , the ibrs 100 include an aggregation end ibr ( ae - ibr ) and remote end ibrs ( re - ibrs ). the enodeb 116 of the ae - ibr is typically connected locally to the core network via a fiber pop 120 . the re - ibrs and their associated enodebs 116 are typically not connected to the core network via a wireline connection ; instead , the re - ibrs are wirelessly connected to the core network via the ae - ibr . as shown in fig1 , the wireless connection between the ibrs include obstructions ( i . e ., there may be an obstructed los connection between the re - ibrs and the ae - ibr ). fig2 illustrates an exemplary embodiment of the ibr 100 shown in fig1 . in fig2 , the ibr 100 includes interfaces 104 , interface bridge 108 , mac 112 , modem 124 , channel mux 128 , rf 132 , which includes t × 1 . . . t × m 136 and r × 1 . . . r × n 140 , antenna array 148 ( includes multiple antennas 152 ), a radio link controller ( rlc ) 156 and a radio resource controller ( rrc ) 160 . it will be appreciated that the components and elements of the ibrs may vary from that illustrated in fig2 . additional details regarding the intelligent radio transceiver ( ibr ) are provided in commonly assigned u . s . patent application ser . no . 13 / 645 , 472 , u . s . pat . no . 8 , 311 , 023 and u . s . pat . no . 8 , 238 , 318 , the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety . the intelligent backhaul radio transceiver ( ibr ) 100 is used in a point - to - point or point - to - multipoint connection that can be used for any radio interface that requires high throughput , including backhaul of cellular sites , connectivity among entities within an enterprise , internet to enterprise , or internet to customer premises equipment , campus networks , connectivity among stations in metropolitan area networks , and connection between local area networks and internet service . embodiments of the invention perform detection of radar signal sources that would be interfered by , or interfere with , the ibr . an exemplary embodiment of the required dynamic frequency selection ( radar ) requirement in regulatory environments , such as the u . s . and europe that is used for detecting radars by the ibr equipment while operating radio links at a high duty factor , is used to describe embodiments of the invention . there are significant advantages to effectively performing the radar detection for each transmitter at the receiver side for the array of wireless networked backhaul applications , such as the exemplary point - to - point and point - to - multipoint systems . in fact , for high duty factor fdd point - to - point systems , the radar detection results obtained when at least one radar detector is also co - located at the fdd receivers and when the radar detector has a less directional radar detection antenna than the transmit signal antenna are better for both operation of the radio link and for minimizing any potential interference with the radars due to the instant radio link than when the radar detection is performed only at the transmitter as known in other types of systems . because of the range difference , a radar positioned behind the receiver is closer to the detector than to the interfering radar transmitter . because the radar detector antenna is omnidirectional or less directional than the radio link directional antennas , a radar located to the side of the pair or behind the transmitter is detected at the receiver before it is interfered with by the transmitter . the transmitter signal is reduced in level at the radar due to the directionality of the antenna , while the radar signal arrives full force at the radar detector . also , in an fdd radio using a radar detector co - located with the receiver , the detector can listen for the radar for 100 % duty factor . this creates a peak - detection capability that insures the detector finds the largest radar signal of the time varying channel , overcoming the loss of multipath fading and a rotating radar detection antenna . for these reasons , embodiments of the invention are advantageous because the detectability of the radar is better both in the sense that actual radars are more reliably detected and in the sense that accidental false detections of non - existent radars are greatly reduced . in an exemplary embodiment , the radio uses a separate radar detection circuit which is made from a commercial wifi chip and which has its own antenna . the radar detection circuit inside the wifi chip is used for the radar detection . it may or may not share a common rf signal path with the main operating antennas . there is a benefit in radar detectability if the radar detector antenna field is less directional than that of the actual signal antennas . in one extreme example , the radar detector antenna is omnidirectional or omnidirectional in azimuth , and the transmit signal antenna is a moderate or high gain antenna . the gain difference creates a bias for detection of radar signals versus interference from the transmit signal for radar angles that are behind or on the side of the radar mainlobe . in an exemplary embodiment with a different band used for each transmit direction in a point - to - point or multi - point - to - point link , and which requires radar detection on each band or sub - band , the radar detection performs both initial cac and in - service monitoring , but in different ways and at different times . upon initial bootstrapping of the link , the cac for each radio is performed at its local transmit frequency so the local transmitter can be informed of the result , since there is no link in the other direction yet . then , after the radios establish a connection and are operating at high duty factor , the radar detector in each transceiver switches listening frequency and in - service monitoring is performed at the local receive frequency to listen for radars and so perform in - service monitoring for the transmitter sending from the other radio . more specifically , the in - service monitoring for the downlink transmitter happens at the downlink receiver in point - to - point or at the downlink receivers in multi - point - to - point , and the in - service monitoring for the uplink transmitter ( or transmitters ) happens at the uplink receiver . this is to satisfy the requirement for near 100 % duty factor transmission while detecting at a level that is much lower than the transmit level . the results of the in - service monitoring are communicated along the opposite link direction to the transmit side which the monitoring was being performed for ( i . e . the downlink communicates the uplink radar detection information and the uplink communicates the downlink radar detection information ). if , for example , the uplink radar detector senses a radar signal , it notifies the uplink transmitter through the downlink radio set . in an exemplary embodiment , a controller , such as a radio resource controller , within the transceiver having the uplink transmitter can use this exemplary radar detection result along with other link quality inputs such as estimates of other uncoordinated interference levels observed over frequency , time , space or cancellation capability as described in u . s . provisional patent application ser . no . 61 / 910 , 194 , the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference , to optimally adjust parameters such as the uplink transmit channel center frequency , transmit channel bandwidth and / or transmit power . the invention may be best understood in the context of a design example . it will be appreciated that other designs can be used , and the exemplary design example is not meant to be limiting in any way . the exemplary radio link includes two full duplex transceivers , typically mounted on poles and separated by a large distance , such as five hundred meters . it will be appreciated that the distance may be less than or more than five hundred meters . one transmission direction operates in the upper part of the allocated rf band , called the upper band or sub - band , and other in the lower part of the allocated rf band , called the lower band or sub - band . the point - to - point or multi - point - to - point link in the example uses one radio designated as the downlink transmitter ( using the lower part of the band ) and the other as the uplink transmitter ( using the upper part of the band ). each radio transceiver has a separate radar detection sensor co - located with it . even though the exemplary fdd operation divides this frequency band into a lower and upper band or sub - band , other implementations also can work , including , for example , overlapping bands or sub - bands , also known as zero division duplexing ( or zdd ) such as described in u . s . application ser . no . 13 / 609 , 156 ( now u . s . pat . no . 8 , 422 , 540 ), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference . within each band or sub - band the exemplary radios negotiate an operating frequency in each direction , one direction per band or sub - band . the exemplary radios use multiple transmit and receive antennas ( mimo ) in each direction , and split the available transmit power among the transmit antennas or can operate with miso , siso , or simo operation . in such fdd or zdd wireless communication systems , the transmitters in either of the uplink or downlink directions of point - to - point or multi - point - to - point systems transmit for some or all of each frame coincident in time meaning that both an uplink transmitter and a downlink transmitter are both transmitting at the same time possibly within different bands or sub - bands , possibly within the same band or sub - band or possibly even within the same channel . the remainder of this discussion will refer to these exemplary embodiment radios for purpose of explanation only , recognizing that there are many wireless communication system embodiments that can benefit from the invention . the radio , based on an exemplary controller implemented with software and / or hardware , determines the operating frequency , within the constraints of satisfying any uniform channel usage requirement , performs medium access control using energy detection , and performs the channel availability check ( cac ). the cac is a pre - scan of the channel to detect the presence of radars prior to allowing the equipment to transmit . the radio then monitors its channels using in - service monitoring . in an exemplary embodiment , there is a brief period of time after the radar detector in the radio housing containing the downlink radio unit performs the cac where it remains on the transmitter channel for in - service monitoring , while the transmitter channel operates at low duty factor to facilitate the detection synchronization and acquisition of the transmit signal by the other radio ( s ), and communicating to the other radio ( s ) what channel it would like to operate on . this is a bootstrap mode of operation . once the communication link is established , the radar detector frequency channel is switched as described above so that it is listening on the receive channel to perform in - service monitoring for the transmitter in the other radio . in a radar detection listening process , the radar detector attempts to receive signals transmitted from radars . in some embodiments , a radar detection message , control frame or status is transmitted by the radar detector if a signal received at the radar detector sufficiently matches one of a set of designated radar waveforms . in some embodiments , the effective interference bandwidth of the radar receiver is determined . the effective interference bandwidth may be different than the occupied bandwidth of the radar transmit signal by some margin . in that case , only the effective interference bandwidth is vacated — instead of vacating a larger percentage of the overall frequency band for the required period of time ( typically , 30 minutes ). it will be appreciated that the period of time need not be limited to the minimum required by regulations . in some embodiments , the transceivers may remain off the channel for an extended period of time . the communication from the radar detector to the transmitter carries information related to the bandwidth that must be vacated . in an exemplary embodiment , the effective interference bandwidth is determined by measuring the characteristics of the pulses that comprise the radar waveform to estimate what the radar receiver signal bandwidth is . a function is applied to the measured characteristics that adjusts for the ratio of radar receiver interference bandwidth at an anticipated excess interference power to radar receiver signal bandwidth required to process the radar pulse . the radar receiver interference bandwidth that is calculated is the bandwidth that needs to be vacated around the radar center frequency . in an exemplary embodiment , the function is a simple scaling by a constant . in some embodiments , the function depends on the type of radar signal that is detected and / or the excess power level of the detected radar signal over a minimum radar detection threshold . in an exemplary embodiment , the radar signal bandwidth is the inverse of the radar pulse period measured between the half - way points of the rising and falling edge . these are exemplary embodiments and other embodiments can use other methods for estimating the radar receiver bandwidth and applying various functions to the result are also anticipated . in an exemplary embodiment , radar detection is performed on an alternate channel on a continued basis such that if a radar detection occurs on the operating channel , the alternate channel is available for more immediate occupancy because all or part of the cac period is already accomplished . in another exemplary embodiment , after a sufficient cac period has passed for the alternate channel to be useable , it is continually monitored for radars in order to keep the cac information fresh . this alternate channel may be near the occupied channel and may encounter a similar , albeit reduced , level of interference from the transmitter . therefore , in a high duty factor transmission radio link , the alternate channel monitoring can be done , at least for small channel separation , at a remote location so the transmission signal is attenuated . the communication between the alternate channel radar detection and the transmitter is kept fresh such that at least the regulatory impact for timeliness of the information is maintained . in an exemplary embodiment , a point - to - point radio link places both the in - channel radar detector and the alternate - channel radar detector in the receiver or remote detector that can communicate back to the transmitter . in another exemplary embodiment , a point - to - multipoint ( or multi - point - to - point ) radio link uses the radar detector in one receiver for in - channel detection and the radar detector in another receiver for alternate channel detection . in an exemplary embodiment , one or more radar detectors that can operate while a high - duty - factor transmitter is transmitting perform time multiplexing between radar detection on the operating channel and radar detection on an alternate channel . in a further exemplary embodiment , the cac operation is performed while listening for a partial duty factor for a total cac time longer than the full duty factor cac time , and at for least a period of time related to the partial duty factor fraction . in an exemplary embodiment , the length of the partial duty factor check time is at least the cac time divided by the fractional duty factor . in an exemplary embodiment , a point - to - multipoint radio link uses the radar detector in one receiver for in - channel detection and the radar detector in another receiver for alternate channel detection and time - multiplexes one or both for additional alternate channel coverage to provide multiple alternate channel options . fig3 shows a schematic representation of a one way radio link according to some embodiments of the invention . in fig3 , the radio link includes a transmitter 301 with a directional antenna 302 , a receiver 303 with a directional antenna 304 , and a radar detector 306 with an omnidirectional antenna 305 . in one embodiment , one or both of the transmitter 301 and receiver 303 are within an ibr transceiver as shown in fig2 . a communication link 307 between the radar detector 306 and the transmitter 301 is used to communicate the results of any radar detection or non - detection from the radar detector 306 to the transmitter 301 . one problem with existing networks is that when the transmitter is transmitting , the high signal level swamps out the receive signals for typical receivers that are located in close proximity to the transmitter , thereby limiting the ability for a radar detector co - located with the transmitter to detect a radar signal . a co - located radar detector is one that is in close enough proximity to the transmitter that when antenna configurations are accounted for , the radar detector cannot detect a radar signal at the required level , as typically set by the appropriate regulatory authority , while the transmitter is transmitting . a radar detector is transmit - impaired if the signal from the transmitter prevents the radar detector from detecting radar signals at or above the regulatory limit while the impairing transmitter is emitting its transmit signal . a radar detector is not transmit - impaired if it can still detect radar signals at or above the regulatory limit while the transmitter is emitting its transmit signal . the transmitter may emit its transmit signal in the same channel as the radar detector to impair the radar detection , or the transmit signal may be emitted in a nearby channel , even if such nearby channel is in a different frequency band , and still impair the radar . the impairment can be prevented by separating the radar detector in distance from the transmitter , or by using a directional transmit antenna or directional radar - detector - receive antennas to reduce the impinging signal on the radar detector , or any other means to reduce the transmit signal level , including a cancellation circuit for cancelling the transmit signal at the input of or within the radar detector using , for example , techniques described in u . s . application ser . no . 13 / 609 , 156 ( now u . s . pat . no . 8 , 422 , 540 ), the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference . in fig3 , a radar 308 with a directional antenna 309 is also shown . the radar 308 is shown relative to the range scales 310 - 312 . the range scales include a maximum interference range to the radar 310 , which is a range showing the maximum distance from the transmitter 301 to avoid interference with the radar 308 . the range scales also include a max radio range 311 which is the maximum distance from the transmitter 301 to the receiver 303 . the range scales also include a max detector range to radar 312 , which is the maximum distance that the detector 306 can detect radar . the radar detector 306 detects radar from the radar 308 in a range that is longer than the range at which the radio transmitter 301 interferes with the radar 308 . in operation , when the transmitter 301 operates at a high duty factor at the max radio range 311 , the radar detector 306 can detect the radar 308 at a range less than the max detector range to the radar 312 . the max detector range to the radar 312 is the range at which the transmitter 301 would not interfere with the radar 308 receiver operation over the max interference range to radar 310 . fig4 shows a schematic representation of a radio link in accordance with some embodiments of the invention . in fig4 , the radio link includes a first transceiver 401 having an antenna 402 and a second transceiver 403 having an antenna 404 . the second transceiver 403 includes a radar sensor / detector 406 . the radar detector 406 is co - located with the transmitter of the second transceiver 403 . in the embodiment of fig4 , the radar detector 406 communicates back to the transmitter 401 using the radio transmission link between the first transceiver 401 and the second transceiver 403 . in particular , in fig4 , the radar results are communicated over the operational channel in the transmitter in transceiver 403 to the receiver in transceiver 401 . the radar detector 406 is shown as located in the same unit as transmitter / receiver 403 and controls the communication link 407 . it will be appreciated that a full duplex radio link with radar detection occurring on each side ( the transmit side and the receive side ), may be constructed from two or more links of this nature . fig5 is a schematic representation of a radio link according to other embodiments of the invention . in fig5 , a radar detector 506 a , 506 b is provided in each transceiver 501 , 503 . the arrangement of fig5 allows the use of the radar detectors 506 to operate as an in - service monitor on each link 507 a , 507 b and perform cac and bootstrap in - service monitoring for its own link 507 a , 507 b . in fig5 , first transceiver 501 includes a first radar detector 506 a , and the second transceiver 503 includes a second radar detector 506 b . a first communication link 507 a is provided between the transmitter of the first transceiver 501 and the receiver of the second transceiver 503 , and a second communication link 507 b is provided between the transmitter of the second transceiver 503 and the receiver of the first transceiver 501 . the communications links 507 a and 507 b are the transmission channels between the transceivers 501 , 503 . in operation , the radar detector 506 a communicates the results of its radar detection operations to the transceiver 503 using communications link 507 a , and the radar detector 506 b communicates the results of its radar detection to the transceiver 501 using the communications link 507 b . the radar detection status results may be communicated on the transmission channel , for example , in the main data stream , the control block , or any method of signaling the information . fig6 a and 6b are time lines showing the radar detection operations for an exemplary link according to embodiments of the invention . in fig6 a , the timing operations of the transmitter are shown , and , in fig6 b , radar detection timing of a co - located radar detector is shown . at a high - level , as shown in fig6 a , a cac period 616 is followed by the low duty factor transmit periods for bootstrap , the low duty factor transmit periods for bootstrap 614 are followed by a time break 615 , and the full duty factor transmission 616 follows the time break 615 . the operations will now be described in further detail . as shown in fig6 a , the first event is the cac period 613 , which is performed by the radar detector on the radio &# 39 ; s transmit channel . once the cac period 613 finishes , the links lock up . until there is a reverse communication link , there is no information that can be communicated between them . so until that point in time , any cac 613 or in - service monitoring 614 is performed locally because there would be no way to relay that information from the other side if it were performed remotely . to accomplish the local in - service monitoring the radar detector listens at the transmit frequency . therefore , the transmitter cannot transmit all the time or the radar detection receiver is swamped . the transmitter is operated at a low duty factor during this bootstrap period to facilitate the radar detection during this period . once the round trip connection is made , the radar detector is switched to the receive frequency and used as a remote radar detector for the opposite side . the reverse of this happens on the other side , so that radar detection is performed at the respective receivers of both devices . fig6 a shows the operation of the transmitter where the high level of the pulses 14 and 16 indicate the on - time of the transmission . the break in timing shown by the double lines 15 indicates there is no specific time duration of these steps because that depends on the implementation . as shown in fig6 b , during the cac period 613 , the radar detector listens for radars . during the off cycles of the low duty factor transmission , the radar detector listens on the transmit channel for radars . when the transmitter operates at full duty factor , it is no longer listening on the same channel and switches to the receive channel for the transceiver it is co - located with . the high level of the pulses 617 , 618 and 616 b , indicate the active listening time of the radar detector that is co - located in the same radio as the transmitter shown in fig6 a . during the cac period 613 , the transmitter is off , and the radar detector is listening for radars 617 on the transmitter channel . after the cac period 613 passes , the transmitter begins transmitting at a low duty factor 614 while the radar detector still listens on the transmitter frequency channel during the off period of the transmitter duty cycle 618 . after there is a round trip connection , the transmitter operates at a high duty factor 616 , which can be as high as 100 %, and the radar detector operates at a high duty factor but at the channel of the receiver in the radio housing . fig7 shows a one - sided radar detection setup which has a transmitter and receiver on one side , and a transmitter , receiver and radar detector on the other side . the radar detector relays its results through the communication means through its local transmitter to the receiver on the other side , as a notification that the transmitter on the other side must stop transmitting . the exemplary block diagram in fig7 indicates an exemplary implementation corresponding to the embodiment shown in fig4 . fig7 shows a radio link between a first transceiver 720 and a second transceiver 721 . the second transceiver 721 includes a band b receiver 722 and a band a transmitter 723 in communication with one another over communications link 724 . the band a transmitter includes 723 includes a directional antenna 725 , and the band b receiver includes a directional antenna 726 . the first transceiver 720 includes a band a receiver 732 having a directional antenna 727 and a band b transmitter 731 having a directional antenna 728 . the first transceiver 720 further includes a bands a and b radar detector 730 having an omni - directional antenna 735 . the bands a and b radar detector 730 is in communication with the band b transmitter over link 729 . the normal payload transmission traffic between transceivers 720 and 721 occurs over communications link 734 in the reverse direction on band a and is transmitted by the band a transmitter 723 and received by the band a receiver 732 . in fig7 , the interaction between the bands a and b radar detector 730 and the transmitter 723 is shown as a communication to the local transmitter 729 and the communication 733 through the local transmitter 729 to the remote receiver 726 is the combination of the radar information and the radio payload on transmission band b . in this case , the bands a and b radar detector 730 first listens through the omnidirectional antenna 735 on band b for the cac and low duty factor transmission from the band b transmitter 731 through the directional antenna 728 . the bands a and b radar detector 730 signals through communication link 729 if the channel is clear or blocked . after bootstrap , the bands a and b radar detector 730 switches its listening frequency to band a and performs in - service monitoring for band a transmitter 723 . if the bands a and b radar detector 730 detects a radar , it signals through communication link 729 to the band b transmitter 731 , and then over the air on radar detection results communication and payload transmission 733 to radio 721 . the radar detection results are received by the band b receiver 722 through antenna 726 . the band b receiver 722 sends control information over link 724 to indicate to the band a transmitter 723 that transmission needs to stop . the radio 721 then selects an alternate operating frequency if one is available . fig8 shows a two - way link which has a transceiver and radar detector on both sides of the link . the radar detector on each side of the link uses its local communication links to either enable / disable its local transmitter after cac and during bootstrap , or to communicate to the other side of the link to indicate to the other side that the transmitter has a clear channel or must stop transmitting due to a radar on its channel . in particular , as shown in fig8 , the two - way link includes a first transceiver 820 and a second transceiver 821 . the second transceiver 821 includes a band b receiver 822 and a band a transmitter 823 in communication with one another over communications link 824 . the band a transmitter includes 823 includes a directional antenna 825 , and the band b receiver includes a directional antenna 826 . the second transceiver 821 further includes a bands a and b radar detector 837 and an omni - directional antenna 838 . a communications link 835 is provided between the bands a and b radar detector 837 and the band a transmitter 823 . the first transceiver 820 includes a band a receiver 832 having a directional antenna 827 and a band b transmitter 831 having a directional antenna 828 . a communications link 829 is provided between the band a receiver 832 and the band b transmitter 831 . the first transceiver 820 further includes a bands a and b radar detector 830 and an omni - directional antenna 839 . the bands a and b radar detector 830 is in communication with the band b transmitter over link 836 . the normal payload transmission traffic between transceivers 820 and 821 occurs over link 834 in the reverse direction on band a and is transmitted by the band a transmitter 823 and received by the band a receiver 832 . an exemplary sequence can be that each side listens in its respective transmit band , band a for radio 821 b and band b for radio 820 , during the respective cac periods 17 . after each radio passes cac , the transmitter on one side , for example band a transmitter 823 , starts transmitting at low duty factor , and the band a and b radar detector 837 performs in - service monitoring . after the band a receiver 832 locks to the band a transmitter 823 , there is a reverse link transmission that locks the band b transmitter 831 to the band b receiver 822 . then , the band a and b radar detectors 837 and 830 switch from their respective transmit bands to their respective receive bands , the bands a and b radar detector 830 listens on band a to monitor for radars in the channel of the band a transmitter 823 and the bands a and b radar detector 837 listens on band b to monitor for radars in the channel of the band b transmitter 831 . fig9 shows that the same approach is scalable to a point - to - multipoint network . it will be appreciated that the approach is also scalable to multiple point - to - point , ad hoc , ring , self - organizing , relay , mesh and other network architectures . it will be appreciated that the approach may be used with any connectivity architecture . in fig9 , a third transceiver 939 is part of the network ( or system ). the third transceiver 940 is shown in fig9 directly connected to transceiver 921 . it will be appreciated that the third transceiver 940 could alternatively be directly connected to transceiver 920 . in one exemplary embodiment , the transceiver 921 is a multipoint aggregator and transceivers 920 and 940 are multipoint remote units . in this case , each of the remote transceivers 920 , 940 performs its own cac on its respective transmit bands . after locking to the multipoint aggregator 921 , the transceivers 920 , 940 switch their band a and b radar detectors to their receive bands to do in - service monitoring in the band a transmitter transmit band . if a radar is detected in one of the remote radios 920 , 940 , the aggregation radio 921 is informed through the communications link and it stops transmitting on that channel . a new channel is determined for both remote transceivers 920 , 940 . it will be appreciated that the results of individual radar detectors may be communicated to the other radios ( not shown ) in a sub - net or area wide network . in the point - to - multipoint configuration of fig9 , the radar detection task is distributed among the remote transceivers 920 , 940 such that they perform detection on different parts of the radar detection band or the useable bandwidth , each detecting on a portion of the bandwidth of interest , and including but not limited to one detecting on the operating channel while the other detects on an alternate channel that can be used as a hot spare to jump to in the event the operating channel must be vacated . the radar detectors in the radio system become a shared resource or network of radar detectors tied together through a communications systems , where the detectors are used cooperatively , or in a coordinated manor , to perform in - service monitoring , channel look ahead , extended detection bandwidth , and more reliable detectability through location , angle , and antenna diversity . in an exemplary embodiment , one remote radio detects on part of the channel bandwidth and the other remote radio detects on the remaining part . with more radar detectors , the load can be divided appropriately . in another exemplary embodiment , one remote radio performs radar detection on an assigned portion of the band or sub - band where the operating channel is , and at least one other radar detector in a different location performs radar detection in another portion of the band or sub - band , which is then available immediately if the operating channel has to be vacated . in one exemplary embodiment the distribution of detection bandwidth , operating bands , or sub - bands is determined early in the bootstrap period , and , in another exemplary embodiment , it is dynamically determined once the radio locks up and enters in - service monitoring . these radar detectors communicate their results back to the multipoint aggregator 921 , or to each other in other configurations of the intercommunication . in a further exemplary embodiment , the aggregator 921 also has a radar detector co - located with the transmitter that can operate in the band or sub - band but sufficiently spaced from the operating channel that it is protected from the transmission and can perform radar detection on these well - separated channels to provide alternate channel availability for the transmitter . one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein may be embodied in a computer - readable medium on which is stored one or more sets of instructions ( e . g ., software ). the software may reside , completely or at least partially , within memory and / or within a processor during execution thereof . the software may further be transmitted or received over a network . the term “ computer - readable medium ” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media that store the one or more sets of instructions . the term “ computer - readable medium ” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing , encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by a machine and that cause a machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present invention . the term “ computer - readable medium ” shall accordingly be taken to include , but not be limited to , solid - state memories , and optical and magnetic media . embodiments of the invention have been described through functional modules at times , which are defined by executable instructions recorded on computer readable media which cause a computer , microprocessors or chipsets to perform method steps when executed . the modules have been segregated by function for the sake of clarity . however , it should be understood that the modules need not correspond to discreet blocks of code and the described functions can be carried out by the execution of various code portions stored on various media and executed at various times . it should be understood that processes and techniques described herein are not inherently related to any particular apparatus and may be implemented by any suitable combination of components . further , various types of general purpose devices may be used in accordance with the teachings described herein . it may also prove advantageous to construct specialized apparatus to perform the method steps described herein . the invention has been described in relation to particular examples , which are intended in all respects to be illustrative rather than restrictive . those skilled in the art will appreciate that many different combinations of hardware , software , and firmware will be suitable for practicing the present invention . various aspects and / or components of the described embodiments may be used singly or in any combination . it is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only , with a true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the claims .