cargo hook device 20 &# 39 ; has been improved over device 20 , fig6 u . s . pat . no . 5 , 074 , 608 , by the addition of an electromagnet 65 , fig6 . the purposeof magnet 65 is to enable hook 20 &# 39 ; to be better able to snatch cable 11 on the first try when lowering hoist cable 7 , attached to a winch in helicopter 71 . the jaws 1 and 2 of device 20 &# 39 ; separate upon the instant cable 7 becomes slackened . the hook would be guided to the location of load cable 11 by pole 68 with a u - shaped tubing 69 at its end , having the appearance of a two - pronged fork . once the hook is over the cable to be snatched and the hook is lowered on top of it , jaws 1 and 2 separate , and magnet 65 picks up magnetically attractable load cable . now when cable 7 is pulled upward , cable 11 keeps adhered to magnet 65 as shown in fig7 . cable 11 remains adhered to magnet 65 until the hook begins to lift load 3 . then cable 11 separates from magnet 65 , while magnet 65 moves sideways , as shown in fig6 . the separation of cable 11 from magnet 65 occurs because weight 3 has greater force than the attraction of cable 11 to magnet 65 . the above improvement would minimize the amount of manipulation that otherwise would be required to place the hook directly above load cable 11and keep the hook there under high velocity down - wash conditions , with the hook at the end of a 50 to 100 ft . cable . as the hook is being lowered from the helicopter and comes within about 6 ft . of the load cable , a ground person with a long pole 68 with attached two - prong fork 69 , moves the fork over to hoist cable 7 and places the cable inside the fork between the two prongs , guiding it so it hovers directly over the load cable . upon further lowering of cable 7 , the hook touches cable 11 , and assoon as cable 7 becomes a little slackened , jaws 1 and 2 of hook 20 &# 39 ; separate , allowing magnet 65 to grab cable 11 as shown in fig7 . strengths of magnets 6 and 6 &# 39 ; can be such that the instant that cable 11 is touched by either jaw 1 or 2 or both , the jaws separate . instantly , cable 11 is grabbed by magnet 65 , which could be either a permanent magnetor an electromagnet . consequently , when hook 20 &# 39 ; is pulled up by cable 7 , cable 11 is drawn upward , too . to produce instant separation of jaws 1 and 2 , device 20 &# 39 ;, three techniquesare applied . 3 . poles of permanent magnets 6 and 6 &# 39 ; facing each other to be of like polarity to produce a repelling force . the least expensive technique is utilizing the tension spring approach to force separation of jaws 1 and 2 , when the instant device 20 &# 39 ; makes contact with a surface below . no harm would occur if spring 21 should become ineffective , should it be the only technique used to separate jaws 1 and 2 , upon touchdown , the result being that jaws 1 and 2 would not separate to allow cable 11 to be released . if weights 8 and 8 &# 39 ; were used , too , then separation of jaws 1 and 2 could be assured , even if spring 21 were damaged or broken . to ensure that minimum manipulation would be required to successfully and quickly engage a load cable , in the environment of a hovering helicopter , where high velocity down - wash exists , with hook 20 &# 39 ; at the end of a 50 ft . or longer cable , in addition to a long pole with attached fork , device 20 &# 39 ; itself could be made more visible to the operator of the aircraft &# 39 ; s hoist mechanism , as well as to the person handling long pole 68 , fig1 . the hook could be painted with luminescent paint and also be provided with reflectors 70 . leds 14 on both sides of device 20 &# 39 ; illuminate and provide visibility at night and on cloudy days . then , the winch &# 39 ; s operator may be concerned about the possibility of device20 &# 39 ; being caught in branches of trees . to reduce this possibility , the hook &# 39 ; s surface could be coated with slippery , stable teflon , to enable it to slip out of tree limbs , etc ., if accidentally caught . fig8 device 93 shows a front view of device 20 &# 39 ; with an elongated permanent magnet 72 attached to the pivot pin &# 39 ; s hub , as shown . the magnet is shown protruding vertically downward with jaws 1 and 2 completely separated . coil 29 and jaw 2 are desirable when positive load retention isrequired when lifting a load and jaws 1 and 2 are engaged , as shown in fig . if a permanent magnet is used , its strength should be tested to be sure that it has not been demagnetized . if demagnetized , the magnet should be re - magnetized using the proper procedure for doing so . a single bar magnet with its end magnetized has been shown in the previous assembly drawings , that single magnet being attached to one of the two rotating hubs . to be more certain that the load cable will be attracted bythe magnet , another magnet is attached to the second rotating hub , as shownin fig9 device 20 . now , as the two magnets align , when jaws 1 and 2 are separated as shown in fig5 the magnetic force of attraction for cable 11 is doubled , and it is more certain that cable 11 will be picked up by the hook 20 , when its jaws are placed over cable 11 . even without the back - up positive load retention of an electromagnet , the presence of permanent magnets 72 and 73 , mounted as shown in fig9 couldprovide that capability . thus , should hoist cables 7 and 7 &# 39 ; slacken , because of making contact with tree limbs , the load cable might loosen andjump up . in so doing , load cable 11 could be caught by the permanent magnets , and held there until tension is restored in hoist cables 7 and 7 &# 39 ;. reflectors 70 , 70 &# 39 ;, shown in fig6 and 9 , would assist in locating the hook &# 39 ; s presence at dusk or at night - time loading operations . the advantage of using an electromagnet 65 over a permanent magnet 72 is that remote and automatic release of load cable 11 is more likely . the procedure for releasing cable 11 from the hook is described in u . s . pat . no . 5 , 074 , 608 . with permanent magnets 72 and 73 in place , load cable 11 could be pulled away from device 20 &# 39 ; manually . a pound or two of force could be all that is necessary to remove cable 11 from permanent magnets 72 and 73 , were cable 11 adhered by an attraction force to the magnets . if electromagnet 65 , fig6 is used , coil 29 may not be necessary for positive load retention of cable 11 . electromagnet 65 may perform that capability , if designed with sufficient magnetic strength , particularly iftwo bar electromagnets were used , one attached to each of two pivot pin hubs . previously , a means for guiding cable 7 over the load cable was described using a very long pole with a two - pronged fork attached at its end , as shown in fig1 . a fork can push cable 7 in three directions . the fork &# 39 ; s fourth direction is open . hence , a second pole would be necessary , as shown in fig3 to provide movement of cable 7 in the fourth direction . fig4 a and 4b show alternate shapes of tubing attached to the end of poles 74 and 76 to enable a person to move a hoist cable in all four directions . fig4 a shows a hook 75 for engaging cable 7 , which may take alittle more effort to engage than fork 69 because of the smaller opening . fig4 b , shows rectangular configured tubing 77 with an opening 77 &# 39 ; on itsside for engaging cable 7 . this rectangular configuration , too , will take alittle more effort to engage cable 7 than fork 69 , the amount of effort depending on the size of opening 77 &# 39 ;. a technique similar to that shown in fig4 a and 4b but providing a largeropening on its side 77 &# 39 ;, fig4 b is shown in fig1 to 14 . here two spring - loaded gates or gates which swing both inwardly and outwardly , 83 and 83 &# 39 ; are shown . referring to fig1 and 3 , poles 68 and 68 &# 39 ; with 2 pronged forks are usedto guide the hoist cable to the load cable &# 39 ; s location . there is always the possibility that the hoist cables could escape from the open end of the fork . to reduce this possibility , the rectangular configuration of fig1 is presented . fig1 shows light - weight channel 78 , as the long pole of fig1 rectangular metal or reinforced plastic enclosure 79 , with solenoid 81 , collar 82 and swinging doors or gates 83 and 83 &# 39 ;. in the side view , fig1 , hinge 84 is shown . shown by itself in plan view , fig1 , is one of the spring - loaded , light - weight hinges capable of swinging both inwardly and outwardly . coil springs inside barrel 84 provide the hinge &# 39 ; s ability to return to the position shown in fig1 , after being deflected by the doors or gates 83 and 83 &# 39 ;, fig1 , moving inward or outward . the gap between metal swinging doors 83 and 83 &# 39 ;, fig1 should be extremely small . either door or gate 83 and 83 &# 39 ; accommodates a push - type solenoid 81having a rectangular plunger 85 and a rectangular hole or a circular plunger 92 , fig1 , and a circular hole to accept the plunger when extended , by the application of voltage to its coil . channel - sectioned pole 78 is preferred because of its resistance to bending compared to a tubular pole . collar 82 connects channel 78 to rectangular enclosure 79 fig1 . a rechargeable battery 86 is enclosed within handle 80 to supply the voltage and current to activate solenoid plunger 85 when a switch 87 on handle 80 is closed , fig2 . enclosure 79 provides positive cable - retention means . by plunger 85 extending into a properly - shaped hole in the opposite door , doors 83 and 83 &# 39 ; are maintained closed to trap hoist cable 7 within enclosure 79 fig1 . thus , the person holding channel 78 , fig1 , by handle 80 , can guide hoist cable 7 over to the load cable &# 39 ; s location , while standing away from helicopter 71 &# 39 ; s down - wash . pole 78 should be madeof lightweight metal , such as aluminum . when switch 87 , fig2 , open - circuited , solenoid &# 39 ; s plunger 85 retracts to its normal position by a coil spring within the solenoid &# 39 ; s enclosure . whenswitch 87 is close - circuited , plunger 85 or 92 extends out to engage the hole in the opposite door or gate . an alternate solenoid design would makean extended plunger 85 or 92 its normal , switch - off position , and a retracted plunger 85 , its position with switch 87 turned &# 34 ; on &# 34 ;. the amount of swaying hook 20 dangling from a 100 ft . hovering helicopter could be great , particularly under windy conditions . the fork &# 39 ; s purpose is to keep the hook from swaying while providing cable - retention . fig1 and 18 show a solenoid 91 with a circular - shaped plunger 92 , as a substitute for solenoid 81 . in the previous techniques for snatching the load cable , bar magnets were used . if the cable is not magnetically attractable , then the magnet cannotdraw the cable to itself . another technique is needed to pick up a nonferrous cable . the proposed technique is using a forceps - like approach to prepare the cable pick - up using two inside smaller jaws , 88 and 89 , shown in fig1 and 21 . jaw 88 is attached to the hub of lower portion 1 , while jaw 89 is attached to the hub of lower portion 2 . when lower portions 1 and 2 separate , jaws 88 and 89 come together to grab cable 11 , fig2 . when lower portions 1 and 2 come together , jaws 88 and 89 separate as in fig1 . this approach may require more pin - point positioning of the device shown in these figures than using one or more bar magnets . in the case of magnets , the cable would jump up to become attached to the magnet . here , the jaw ends of jaws 88 and 89 must be able to scoop up cable 11 and thus prepare device 94 to be better able to snatch cable 11 upon closing as in fig2 . widths of jaws 88 and 89 are equal to the widths of lower portions 1 and 2 . however , only half of widtht , fig2 , would be holding jaws 88 and 89 in place , because the hubs of pin 10 to which jaws 88 and 89 are attached are half the width of distancet , fig2 . jaws 88 and 89 could be fabricated of either metal or plastics , because the only weight jaws 88 and 89 would be picking up is the weight ofcable 11 , not including the load or cargo . the ends of jaws 88 and 89 couldhave a coating of sticky substance to enable cable 11 to adhere to the jawsuntil lower portions 1 and 2 come together . once lower portions come together or in the process thereof , cable 11 could slip off of the ends ofjaws 88 and 89 and still be captured by jaw ends of lower portions 1 and 2 . legs 15 of the device shown in fig1 to 21 help keep the device upright until the hoist cable is pulled upward by a winch in a hovering helicopter . to release cable 11 from the device , the device is lowered onto a platform . upon making contact or touchdown , lower portions separate . while these portions are partially separated , one need only pull up the device quicklyand the cable 11 will be released from jaws 88 and 89 . it should be pointed out that the space inside the lower portions 1 and 2 has been enlarged to allow the addition of jaws 88 and 89 . fig2 is an electrical schematic of the circuitry for electromagnetic components 29 and 65 , shown in fig6 and 7 , in which dc voltage source 38 is the sole energy source for energizing the components . however , it should be mentioned that electromagnet 29 may be unnecessary for back - up load retention with the presence of magnet 65 , particularly if two bar magnets 72 and 73 fig9 were used . bars 72 and 73 , fig9 could be provided with coils , assuming they were soft iron or steel . now should device 20 &# 39 ; hit a tree limb , causing cable 11 to loosen or become slack , cable 11 would be grabbed by magnet 65 , thus preventing cable 11 from slipping out of any gap that may occur between jaws of lower portions 1 and 2 . when using soft iron and coils , magnets 72 , 73 could become electromagnets . switch 37 , for energizing the electromagnets , could be located in the winch operator &# 39 ; s cabin while switch 36 could be located where convenient for ground personnel to operate . light - emitting diodes ( leds ) 14 , which illuminate the front and rear of device 20 &# 39 ; when coil 66 is energized , are shown connected in series with resistors 35 across wires32 and 32 &# 39 ;. to reduce the amount of weight a person may have to lift , long pole 68 could have lightweight plastic supports 90 , 90 &# 39 ;, 90 &# 34 ; that could collapse if heavier weight were imposed on them than the pole . the supports would enable the pole to be made of lighter weight material and be made less sturdy than a pole &# 39 ; s construction would need to have been if no supports were provided . the lightweight supports would be swivelly attached to the pole and still stay in position horizontally . hence , there would be less lifting of pole 68 by the person guiding the pole at handle 86 , fig1 and fig2 . supports 90 , 90 &# 39 ;, 90 &# 34 ;, could be fitted with lightweight plastic wheels 91 to enable movement of pole 68 with ease by an individual . the support 90 closest to fork 69 would be the longest in height while the one closest to handle 86 would be the shortest in height . thus , less lifting would be required , if any , by the individual holding handle 86 . plastic wheels are available from baby carriage manufacturers . plastic molding firms could supply the supports . in fig2 and 21 , device 20 is shown attached to hoist cables 7 and 7 &# 39 ;. hand - spliced eyes and thimbles 23 are shown . an off - the - shelf shackle could have been mounted in hole 24 , fig2 , instead of eyes and thimbles . hole 24 &# 39 ;, fig1 , has been provided for tubular member 15 , so member 15 would not interfere with cable 7 . the strength of the tubular member or inverted u - shaped standard 15 need be only such as to support device 2 & amp ; and any dynamic force encountered upon impact on a rigid surface in preventing device from toppling over on its side . member 15 is capable of swiveling inside of hole 24 &# 39 ; and is restrained from moving beyond stops 28 . extension spring 21 , with one end attached to upper portion 2 &# 39 ; and its other end attached to the outer surface of portion 1 , assists in separating lower portions 1 and 2 upon touchdown of load 3 , fig3 . spring21 , fig1 and 21 , can be protected from dirt , moisture and debris by having fabric sleeve 33 fastened tightly to the underside of weight 8 at one end and to the exterior of portion 1 at its other end . flexible , light - weight sleeve 33 , treated to be impervious to water , could be fastened air tight at its ends to the device &# 39 ; s structure , so as to have the spring &# 39 ; s coils protected from mud , small rocks , dirt and chemicals . the advantage of the spring over the weights on top is the spring &# 39 ; s independence of the force of gravity . even when the hook may be lying flaton its side on a rigid surface , spring 21 could be keeping lower portions 1and 2 apart , so either bar magnet 72 or electromagnet 65 could be attracting load cable 11 to itself . if cable 11 is attracted to magnet 65 , then the hook would retain the cable within its lower portions while the hoist cable is being pulled up and hold it while lower portions 1 and 2 close together . when the force of load 3 comes into play , then cable 11 would detach itself from the magnet and be supported by jaws 12 and 13 of hook 20 &# 39 ;, fig1 and 21 . the magnet has a further role to play as a positive - load - retention device should lower portions 1 and 2 accidentally separate such as by the device being caught in tree limbs . even as the jaws disengage , because of the hoist cable &# 39 ; s slackening , cable 11 would beattracted to the magnet and be prevented from being released , along with retaining load 3 . fig2 a and 24b are the front and side views of one of the smaller jaws , while fig2 a and 25b are front and side views of the other smaller jaw . in side view , fig2 b , the portion of width w would be firmly fastened to the underside of one of the pivot pin &# 39 ; s hub , while side view , fig2 b , the portion of width w &# 39 ; would be firmly fastened to the pivot pin &# 39 ; s other hub . fig2 a , 26b and 26c are front , side and end views of permanent magnet 72 . note from fig2 c , that magnet 72 is rectangular in cross section . the other magnets , including the permanent and electromagnets , also have rectangular cross sections . inner jaws 88 and 89 may have a sticky substance added to their lower inside surfaces 92 and 93 , fig2 a , 25a , to assist in their picking up acable and holding onto it , while outer jaws , the main jaws , 1 and 2 , are coming together upon lift - off of the device and load 3 , fig2 , from platform 4 . it would be desirable to apply a gooey , sticky substance to inside surfaces 92 and 93 of jaws 88 and 89 , which would stay on permanently , while temporarily sticking to cable 11 . a gooey substance that cures soft , sticky and resilient could be obtained from several chemical producers , such as dupont and minnesota mining / manufacturing .