Traditional Abacus and Bead Arithmetic/Division/Guide to traditional division (帰除法)

Introduction.
Traditional division method (TD), "kijohou", "guī chúfǎ" (帰除法), is one of the two main methods of division used with the abacus. This method makes use of both the multiplication table and a specific division table and has been the standard method studied with the abacus for at least 4 centuries, losing popularity in the 1930s. As a digit-by-digit or slow division algorithm, has been introduced in the previous chapter, where its special characteristic is revealed: it does not require "thinking" but only following some rules. This document is an introduction to its use on the abacus and it is assumed that the reader is already proficient in the modern division (MD) method.
The division table.
In the previous chapter ../Modern and traditional division; close relatives/, the following division table has been introduced
where in each cell the result of the Euclidean division formula_1 (formula_2: quotient, formula_3: remainder, formula_4 digits from 1 to 9) is expressed in the form formula_5 for reasons that we will see below. This means that the following hold:
formula_6
The table has three zones corresponding to the following: If the divisor has figures and we compare it with the first n digits (from the left) of the dividend, with added trailing  zeros if necessary, three cases can occur:
The blank cells below the diagonal of the division table above correspond to case 1. They could be filled in the style of the tables that can be seen elsewhere, but we leave them empty for simplicity. If during the division we fall into this zone, we will proceed, for now, simply by revising up the previous quotient digit as we will see in the examples that follow.
The diagonal elements (in gray) correspond to the case 2 and can only occur if the divisor has at least two digits.
Finally, the other non-diagonal elements correspond to the case 3, which can be considered the most important to study.
There is no doubt that memorizing the division table takes time and effort and that you want to know if the traditional method of division is right for you before investing so much time and effort. Fortunately, the division by nine, five, and two tables are remarkably simple and can be memorized almost instantly (see below), as well as diagonal elements for multi digit divisors. This means that we can learn this traditional technique using divisors that start with only 9, 5 or 2 without much effort and thus be able to decide whether it is worth spending time learning the whole table or not. In what follows we will use examples based on such divisors.
Why do the division rules include remainders?
Suppose we are going to divide 35 by 9, the 3/9&gt;3+3 rule tells us that we must use 3 as an interim quotient and the next step will be to subtract the chunk 3✕9=27 from 35, leaving a remainder of 8. If we also memorize the remainders, we can save this multiplication step as follows: we cancel, clear or erase the first digit of the dividend, in this case 3, then we add the remainder (3) to the next figure (5) of the dividend. In this way, we obtain the same result but without using the multiplication table. With one-digit divisors we will never have to resort to the multiplication table, and in the case of divisors with several figures, proceeding in the same way, we will save one of the necessary multiplications. We will see it on the abacus below, but first we need a few words about how we are going to arrange the division on the abacus.
Modern Division Arrangement (MDA).
It is am assumed throughout this textbook that the reader has already studied the modern abacus method, as typified in the work of Takashi Kojima. In the following examples we will illustrate traditional division using the same division layout that you are already familiar with so that you can more easily follow them and use your usual 4+1 type abacus if you want. We will call this layout Modern Division Arrangement (MDA), but this is not the way division was traditionally organized on the abacus. Later, I will introduce the Traditional Division Arrangement (TDA) which, as we will see, it has some advantages and some disadvantages, including the need (or at least the convenience) of using a specialized abacus with additional upper beads.
While using MDA you can use the same rules you already know about the unit rod if you need them.
Let us see the 35÷9 case  from the above section, first without using the (rule) remainders
And now using the remainders
That is:
One digit divisors.
The number 123456789 has traditionally been used to demonstrate the use of multiplication and division tables in ancient Chinese and Japanese works. Here we will use it with the “easy divisors” 9, 5 and 2.
Multi Digit divisors.
Consider, for example, formula_10, in this case it is convenient to think of the divisor as made up of a divider, the first digit, followed by a multiplier, the rest of the digits of the divisor, that is, formula_11, where formula_12 is the divider (9) and formula_13 is the multiplier (728). The Chinese and Japanese names for this division method (帰除 "Guīchú" in Chinese, 帰除法 "Kijohou" in Japanese) refer to this: 帰, "Guī", "Ki" is the header and 除, "chú", "jo" is the multiplier.
In this case, the way to act is as follows:
These rules are for two-digit divisors, for divisors with more digits things may be more complicated, as in MD (see example formula_19 below). Let us see the above case
Example 359936÷9728=37.
Note: This is an abbreviated notation meaning that 3✕7, 3✕2 and 3✕8 have to be subtracted from IJ, JK, and KL respectively.
Traditional Division Arrangement (TDA).
As commented above, there are two basic ways of arranging general division problems. Let us see them side by side:
So far we have used MDA with the traditional division without any problem. TDA, however, is problematic with any division method, the traditional one included. This troublesome nature is due to a "collision" between the divisor and the dividend/remainder that occurs frequently (that is, both require the simultaneous use of the same column), and special techniques or abaci are needed to deal with this collision. Despite this, the TDA has been used for centuries in conjunction with the traditional method of division, at least since the 13th century, while the MDA has been shelved until modern times. It is clear that certain advantages can be recognized to TDA, but it is not so clear that they are enough to justify its historical use:
The way to avoid the mentioned collision is to accept that the first column of the dividend/remainder, after the application of Chinese division rules, can overflow and temporarily accept a value greater than 9 (up to 18), while providing some mechanism to deal with such an overflow. Interestingly enough, it seems that no ancient text explains how to do the latter, but we will do it in chapter: Dealing with overflow!. 
In the case of a 5+2 or 5+3 abacus we can use the additional upper bead(s) to represent values from 10 to 20, using the "suspended bead" (懸珠 "xuán zhū" in Chinese, "kenshu" in Japanese) in the 5+2 case .
The third or suspended bead is expected to be used only in about 1% of cases, which justifies the adoption of the 5+2 model as standard instead of the 5+3. (If you are interested in using TDA on any abacus, head over to the Dealing with overflow chapter to see how)
For examples of TD using TDA, refer to the Traditional division examples chapter.
About the efficiency of TD.
As you can see in the examples with single digit divisors, TD efficiency deteriorates as the divisor starts with lower figures in the sense that we have to revise up more frequently. We can say that the efficiency is zero when the divisor starts with 1; in fact, we don't even have division rules except 1/1&gt;9+1 (which is "statistically" excessive, see chapter: Learning the division table). For this last case, the trick is to divide by 2 "in situ" (chapter: Division by powers of two) both divisor and dividend, which is very fast, and proceed to divide both results normally; now the divisor begins with a digit between 5 and 9. for example: formula_20
formula_21
In other cases, our intuition and experience with MD could help us.
This lower efficiency of TD compared to MD is the price to pay to save us the mental work of deducting the interim quotient figure that we have to try.