ALGOL 68-R

ALGOL 68-R was the first implementation of the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 68.
In December 1968, the report on the Algorithmic Language ALGOL 68 was published. On 20–24 July 1970 a working conference was arranged by the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) to discuss the problems of implementing the language, a small team from the Royal Radar Establishment (RRE) attended to present their compiler, written by I. F. Currie, Susan G. Bond,
and J. D. Morrison. In the face of estimates of up to 100 man-years to implement the language, using multi-pass compilers with up to seven passes, they described how they had already implemented a one-pass compiler which was in production for engineering and scientific uses.
The compiler.
The ALGOL 68-R compiler was initially written in a local dialect of ALGOL 60 with extensions for address manipulation and list processing. The parser was written using J. M. Foster's "Syntax Improving Device" (SID) parser generator.
The first version of the compiler occupied 34 K words. It was later rewritten in ALGOL 68-R, taking around 36 K words to compile most programs.
ALGOL 68-R was implemented under the George 3 operating system on an ICL 1907F. The compiler was distributed at no charge by International Computers Limited (ICL) on behalf of the Royal Radar Establishment (RRE).
Restrictions in the language compiled.
To allow one pass compiling, ALGOL 68-R implemented a subset of the language defined in the original report:
Many of these restrictions were adopted by the revised report on ALGOL 68.
Specification before use.
To allow compiling in one pass ALGOL 68-R insisted that all identifiers were "specified" (declared) before use.
The standard program:
 PROC even = (INT number) BOOL: ( number = 0 | TRUE | odd (ABS (number - 1)));
 PROC odd = (INT number) BOOL: ( number = 0 | FALSE | even (ABS (number - 1)));
would have to be rewritten as:
 PROC (INT) BOOL odd;
 PROC even = (INT number) BOOL : ( number = 0 | TRUE | odd (ABS (number - 1)));
 odd := (INT number) BOOL : ( number = 0 | FALSE | even (ABS (number - 1)));
To allow recursive declarations of "modes" (types) a special "stub" mode declaration was used to inform the compiler that an up-coming symbol was a mode rather than an operator:
 MODE B;
 MODE A = STRUCT (REF B b);
 MODE B = [1:10] REF A;
No "proceduring".
In the standard language the "proceduring" coercion could, in a "strong" context, convert an expression of some type into a procedure returning that type. This could be used to implement call by name.
Another case where proceduring was used was the declaration of procedures, in the declaration:
 PROC x plus 1 = INT : x + 1;
the right hand side was a "cast" of x + 1 to integer, which was then converted to "procedure returning integer".
The ALGOL 68-R team found this too difficult to handle and made two changes to the language. The proceduring coercion was dropped, and the form "mode : expression" was redefined as a "procedure denotation", casts being indicated by an explicit VAL symbol:
 REAL : x CO a cast to REAL in ALGOL 68 CO
 REAL VAL x CO a cast to REAL in ALGOL 68-R CO
Code that had a valid use for call by name (for example, Jensen's device) could simply pass a procedure denotation:
 PROC sum = (INT lo, hi, PROC (INT) REAL term) REAL :
 BEGIN
 REAL temp := 0;
 FOR i FROM lo TO hi DO
 temp +:= term (i);
 temp
 END;
 print (sum (1, 100, (INT i) REAL: 1/i))
In the version of the language defined in the revised report these changes were accepted, although the form of the cast was slightly changed to "mode (expression)".
 REAL (x) CO a cast to REAL in revised ALGOL 68 CO
Explicit void mode.
In the original language the VOID mode was represented by an empty mode:
 : x := 3.14; CO cast (x := 3.14) to void CO
 PROC endit = GOTO end; CO a procedure returning void CO
The ALGOL 68-R team decided to use an explicit VOID symbol in order to simplify parsing (and increase readability):
 VOID VAL x := 3.14; CO cast (x := 3.14) to void CO
 PROC endit = VOID : GOTO end; CO a procedure returning void CO
This modification to the language was adopted by the ALGOL 68 revised report.
No formal declarers.
"Formal declarers" are the modes on the left hand side of an identity declaration, or the modes specified in a procedure declaration. In the original language, they could include array bounds and specified whether the matching "actual" declarer was fixed, FLEX or EITHER:
 [ 15 ] INT a; CO an actual declarer, bounds 1:15 CO
 REF [ 3 : ] INT b = a; CO This is an error CO
 PROC x = (REF [ 1 : EITHER] INT a) : ...
The ALGOL 68-R team redefined formal declarers to be the same as "virtual declarers" which include no bound information. They found that this reduced the ambiguities in parsing the language and felt that it was not a feature that would be used in working programs.
If a procedure needed certain bounds for its arguments it could check them itself with the UPB (upper bound) and LWB (lower bound) operators.
In ALGOL 68-R the example above could be recoded like this: (the bounds of "a" in the procedure would depend on the caller).
 [ 15 ] INT a; CO an actual declarer, bounds 1:15 CO
 REF [] INT b = a [ AT 3]; CO use "slice" so b has bounds 3:17 CO
 PROC x = (REF [] INT a) VOID: ... CO bounds given by caller CO
In the revised report on ALGOL 68 formal bounds were also removed, but the FLEX indication was moved in position so it could be include in formal declarers:
 [ 1: FLEX ] INT a; CO original ALGOL 68, or ALGOL 68-R CO
 FLEX [ 1: ] INT a; CO revised ALGOL 68, CO
 PROC x = (REF [ 1: FLEX ] INT a) : ... CO Original ALGOL 68 CO
 PROC x = (REF [ ] INT a) VOID: ... CO ALGOL 68-R CO
 PROC x = (REF FLEX [ ] INT a) VOID: ... CO Revised ALGOL 68 CO
No parallel processing.
In ALGOL 68 code can be run in parallel by writing PAR followed by a "collateral clause", for example in:
 PAR BEGIN
 producer,
 consumer
 END
the procedures "producer" and "consumer" will be run in parallel. A semaphore type (SEMA) with the traditional "P" (DOWN) and "V" (UP) operators is provided for sysynchronizing between the parts of the parallel clause,
This feature was not implemented in ALGOL 68-R.
An extension named ALGOL 68-RT was written which used the "subprogramming" feature of the ICL 1900 to provide multithreading facilities to ALGOL 68-R programs with semantics similar to modern thread libraries. No changes were made to the compiler, only the runtime library and the linker.
goto may not be omitted.
In ALGOL 68 the GOTO symbol could be omitted from a jump:
 PROC stop = : ...;
 ...
 BEGIN
 IF x &gt; 3 THEN stop FI; CO a jump, not a call CO
 stop:
 SKIP
 END
As ALGOL 68-R was a one pass compiler this was too difficult, so the GOTO symbol was made obligatory.
The same restriction was made in the official sublanguage, ALGOL 68S.
Uniting is only allowed in "strong" positions.
In ALGOL 68 "uniting" is the coercion that produces a UNION from a constituent mode, for example:
 MODE IBOOL = UNION (INT, BOOL); CO an IBOOL is an INT or a BOOL CO
 IBOOL a = TRUE; CO the BOOL value TRUE is "united" to an IBOOL CO
In standard ALGOL 68 uniting was possible in "firm" or "strong" contexts, so for example could be applied to the operands of "formulas":
 OP ISTRUE = (IBOOL a) BOOL: ...;
 IF ISTRUE 1 CO legal because 1 (INT) can be united to IBOOL CO
 THEN ...
The ALGOL 68-R implementers found this gave too many ambiguous situations so restricted the uniting coercion to "strong" contexts.
The effects of this restriction were rarely important and, if necessary, could be worked around by using a "cast" to provide a strong context at the required point in the program.
F00L.
The ALGOL 68-R compiler initialised unused memory to the value -6815700.
This value was chosen because:
The same value was used to represent NIL.
Stropping.
In ALGOL family languages, it is necessary to distinguish between identifiers and basic symbols of the language. In printed texts this was usually accomplished by printing basic symbols in boldface or underlined (BEGIN or begin for example).
In source code programs, some stropping technique had to be used. In many ALGOL like languages, before ALGOL 68-R, this was accomplished by enclosing basic symbols in single quote characters ('begin' for example). In 68-R, basic symbols could be distinguished by writing them in upper case, lower case being used for identifiers.
As ALGOL 68-R was implemented on a machine with 6-bit bytes (and hence a 64 character set) this was quite complex and, at least initially, programs had to be composed on paper punched tape using a Friden Flexowriter.
Partly based on the experience of ALGOL 68-R, the revised report on ALGOL 68 specified hardware representations for the language, including UPPER stropping.
Extensions to ALGOL 68.
ALGOL 68-R included extensions for separate compiling and low-level access to the machine.
Separate compiling.
Since ALGOL 68 is a strongly typed language, the simple library facilities used by other languages on the ICL 1900 system were insufficient. ALGOL 68-R was delivered with its own library format and utilities which allowed sharing of modes, functions, variables, and operators between separately compiled "segments" of code which could be stored in "albums".
A segment to be made available to other segments would end with a list of declarations to be made available:
 graphlib CO the segment name CO
 BEGIN
 MODE GRAPHDATA = STRUCT ( ... );
 MODE GRAPH = REF GRAPHDATA;
 PROC new graph = ( ... ) GRAPH : ...;
 PROC draw graph = (GRAPH g) VOID : ...;
 END
 KEEP GRAPH, new graph, draw graph
 FINISH
And then the graph functions could be used by another segment:
 myprog WITH graphlib FROM graphalbum
 BEGIN
 GRAPH g = new graph (...);
 draw graph (g);
 END
 FINISH
Low level system access.
As a strongly typed high level language, ALGOL 68 prevents programs from directly accessing the low level hardware. No operators exist for address arithmetic, for example.
Since ALGOL 68-R didn't compile to standard ICL "semicompiled" (link-ready) format, it was necessary to extend the language to provide features in ALGOL 68-R to write code that would normally be written in assembly language. Machine instructions could be written inline, inside CODE ... EDOC sections and the address manipulation operators INC, DEC, DIF, AS were added.
An example, using a George "peri" operation to issue a command:
 [1 : 120] CHAR buff;
 INT unitnumber;
 STRUCT (BITS typemode, reply, INT count, REF CHAR address)
 control area := (8r47400014,0,120,buff[1]);
 CODE 0,6/unitnumber; 157,6/typemode OF control area EDOC
Availability.
A copy of the ALGOL 68-R compiler, runnable under the George 3 operating system emulator, by David Holdsworth (University of Leeds), is available, with source code, under a GNU General Public License (GPL).