We get it you’re excited for Kamala but please stop brigading this leftist sub. Liberals are not leftists because of capitalism and as far as we know she hasn’t changed her policies so she could still be pro-Israel for all we know. Biggest issue that people had with Biden was the genocide and just because she got endorsed doesn’t mean we should suddenly forget about the Palestinians. The lesser evil argument is a just a way of proving that you have no democracy if you have to choose between two Hitlers. It just proves that your two party system is ruled by the bourgeoisie.
user
I don’t think anybody other than maybe Hasan himself is coping that she’s pro Palestine.

And even Hasan acknowledges that he’s probably wish casting.

 Most people around here think the Republican party does significantly more harm to issues they care about including the Palestinians, than Biden or Harris.

And I think most people were convinced that Biden was a guaranteed loss due to his mental deficiencies at this point.

Harris just by being able to speak complete sentences is a much stronger candidate. People are happy that they have some belief that Trump might lose.
assistant
She is absolutely not pro Palestine.  She falls in line with every other zionist scum and will continue to let them genocide.
user
I agree with you. 

I think Hasan misinterpreted her being sidelined and not allowed to speak on any issue as her wanting to distance herself from Biden.

Basically for whatever reason Biden didn't give her much to do.
assistant
It's because he saw a post on Twitter about how she voted against a bill to send more weapons/ funds to Israel awhile back. While he noted that this was when she was gearing up to run against Bernie in the primaries and she was also running as a "Progressive". So while the Dem's were out of power she voted for/ initiated a lot of Progressive bills, knowing they would be killed and that it wouldn't hurt her career, so she could look more Progressive than Bernie on paper. So he was saying that there's a chance that she could've been doing exactly that, but it would still REALLY surprising and bold of her to be one of the only people to vote against it. But he was also saying that it for sure didn't mean she is pro-Palestine. Then also there were reports/ "leaks" that behind closed doors she was really frustrated with how Biden was handling the situation with Israel and that she sympathized with Palestinians. That she wanted to be able to speak out on the issue and do something about it but that she couldn't because she had to fall in line with Biden when it came to Israel. But he said that could also just be lip service/ posturing in case things changed and she ended up being the one running for President, to make it easier for her to get the support of the pro-Palestine voters.
user
Does it matter whether she has true empathy in her heart or just enough political canny to not support a genocide? The result is functionally the same, if she wins she either stops the genocide because she believes it's the right thing to do, or she stops it because she doesn't want to be a 1-term president.
assistant