Been going thru all the coverage on Mamala, and that shit makes me feel like a delusional lib again. The system aint working, Kamala is a pig, but goddamn she has been hitting some high notes on some recent speeches/moments along the campaign trail (for biden and herself)

The narratives are writing themselves now, and the hogs are imploding—trying to use the courts to keep her off the ballot is so juicy (given he attempted to use courts to win a lost election and, not to mention, loaded SCOTUS, further showing how conservatives go around the ppl with the judicial); they can use this in a hundred diff ways. He literally complained ab dems using courts to keep him off the ballot. But, regardless, these dynamics in the new race are excellent. 

DA vs convict. Strong pro-choice woman vs weak anti-choice man. True unity (no open con. Chaos) vs “just saying the word unity.” Young(ish!) former VP vs oldest-ever &amp; disgraced nominee. 

Dont get me wrong, they have to play this very well bc a week ago i would have said i was unsure of kamalas chances but hesitant to box her out. However, for the first time in months i am excited ab the prospect of another four years without a nazi going bananas in the oval office. 

She has to own him in the debate (if he pussies out they gotta air millions of ads calling him a pussy for only debating gramps). She has to pick a good VP-i like Kentucky gov too, but there are several options. But she is 19 yrs younger than Trump and his campaign’s done all the leg work in expressing how important a cogent and younger executive is. He’s fucked himself and this is the single best decision from the biden admin in months if not ever. 

Srry for rant. Just not a doomer for the first time in ages and no longer have to cringe at every utterance of Bidens demented brain. Plus she did air out desires for a ceasefire before biden. But time will tell if shes any different. I hope so at the very least. And that hope is different. The US could end up like those EU nations if we keep some momentum. 
user
My decision on whether to vote for her is entirely tied to her support of the IDF and Bibi.  If she denounces them and the genocide and plans to put a stop to it then I'll vote for her.  If she can't even do that, then my vote is going to Claudia De la Cruz and the PSL.  I cannot morally vote for someone who supports genocide.
assistant
This makes me so curious. Genuinely asking, why would her voting record on local issues not also matter to you? Or even the many international 'wars' the US finds its dirty fingers in?
user
Doesn't matter what she has done or will do, if she support the IDF, she supports genocide.  Anyone that votes for genocide is morally fuckin bankrupt, and history will not look fondly on them, that simple.
assistant
Oh I agree with you I guess I'm just interested in folks with this single issue focus on Palestine right now. Every modern US president has played an active role in the occupation of Palestine, and the genocides of many different peoples.
user
IMO its because of how online the world is, it was far easier to hide all of it and control the narrative back even 8 years ago.  Another thing is that most reactionaries who see innocent Palestinian babies blown apart on their timeline don't have an extensive understanding of American history with imperialism and presidential warcrimes like us because our education system is designed intentionally to ignore it, as well as ignoring critical thinking.  Idk about you but almost all of my knowledge about the US was gained after high school from history books at my college and wikipedia articles as well as many other works lol
assistant