Weakness - Not completely sure about the meaning of the results of certain experiments and the paper refuses to hypothesize any explanations. Other results show very little difference between the alternatives and unclear whether they are significant. - Lot of result description is needlessly convoluted e.g. "less likely to produce less easier to teach and less structured languages when no listener gets reset". ** Suggestions - A related idea of speaker-listener communication from a teachability perspective was studied in [1] - In light of [2], it's pertinent that we check that useful communication is actually happening. The differences in figures seem too small. Although the topography plots do seem to indicate something reasonable going on. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06464 [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05168
- Lot of result description is needlessly convoluted e.g. "less likely to produce less easier to teach and less structured languages when no listener gets reset". ** Suggestions - A related idea of speaker-listener communication from a teachability perspective was studied in [1] - In light of [2], it's pertinent that we check that useful communication is actually happening. The differences in figures seem too small. Although the topography plots do seem to indicate something reasonable going on. [1]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.06464 [2]: https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.05168