-	This paper is a bit difficult to follow. There are some unclear statements, such as motivation.
-	In the introduction, the summarized highlights need to be adequately elaborated, and the relevant research content of this paper needs to be detailed.
-	No new evaluation metrics are proposed. Only existing evaluation metrics are linearly combined. In the experimental analysis section, there needed to be an in-depth exploration of the reasons for these experimental results.
-	A case study should be added.
-	What are the advantages of your method compared to other evaluation metrics? Which needs to be emphasized in the motivation.
-	How do you evaluate the significance of model structure or metrics on the gender bias encoding of the model? Because you only conduct experiments in the FIBER model. Furthermore, you should conduct generalization experiments on the CLIP model or other models.
-	The citation format is chaotic in the paper.
-	There are some grammar mistakes in this paper, which could be found in “Typos, Grammar, Style, and Presentation Improvements”.
- No new evaluation metrics are proposed. Only existing evaluation metrics are linearly combined. In the experimental analysis section, there needed to be an in-depth exploration of the reasons for these experimental results.