1. The scope of the paper seems a bit narrow. The dataset focuses only on company relations, but makes strong claims about generalization of RC models. Perhaps that claim needs to be supported with datasets on a few other domains.
2. The dataset is limited to company relations from Wikipedia pages. This may limit the diversity of the dataset. It may also not be representative of real-world data.
3. The dataset contains only a limited number of relations and examples, which may limit its usability in different scenarios.
4. The few-shot RC models considered in the paper are not state-of-the-art models (e.g. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.205.pdf, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10032649/). How does the performance compare to relation extraction/generation models in few-shot settings.
4. The few-shot RC models considered in the paper are not state-of-the-art models (e.g. https://aclanthology.org/2022.coling-1.205.pdf, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10032649/). How does the performance compare to relation extraction/generation models in few-shot settings.