1. The idea is a bit incremental and simply the extension of previous monolingual LUKE.
2.For the language-agnostic characters of entity representations, the paper has weak analysis on the alignment of entity representations.
The authors could add more analysis about the multilingual alignment of entity representations and it would be better to have visualizations or case studies for different types of languages such as language family. We are also interested in whether entities from low-resourced languages are well aligned with the high-resourced ones.
2.For the language-agnostic characters of entity representations, the paper has weak analysis on the alignment of entity representations. The authors could add more analysis about the multilingual alignment of entity representations and it would be better to have visualizations or case studies for different types of languages such as language family. We are also interested in whether entities from low-resourced languages are well aligned with the high-resourced ones.