1. Compared with DyTox, the proposed method obtains a little performance improvement with more parameters and variance. 2. The experiments based on ImageNet-1000 are missed, which is a large dataset and suitable for real-world situations. 3. The evaluation of FGT is only leveraged to evaluate the method performance in the ablation study, which should be used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and the comparative methods. 4. I want to know why the mode parameters in Table 1 and Figure 5 are different. 5. The article structure of this paper is a mess, whose Appendix should appear in the supplementary material.
3. The evaluation of FGT is only leveraged to evaluate the method performance in the ablation study, which should be used to evaluate the performance of the proposed method and the comparative methods.