If a person's behavior has a harmful impact on others and society, others or society can certainly blame and interfere with him  But what if this is not the case  For example, if a person smokes in the house where he lives alone, a person yells in the wilderness, and a person surfs the Internet in the middle of the night, should we care
In my opinion, whether or not to interfere with an act depends on whether such interference is conducive to the improvement of the public interest, whether it infringes upon the legitimate rights of the parties, and so on
Acts that do not harm the interests of others should not be criticized and interfered by society.