Dilemma reasoning is an inference consisting of two hypothetical judgments and a disjunctive judgment. Hypothetical judgment is the judgment that the existence of one thing (called antecedent) is the condition of the existence of another thing (called antecedent). A disjunctive judgment is a judgment that at least one of several possible scenarios exists. Dilemma reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the existence or non-existence of the antecedent or antecedent of the hypothetical judgment is confirmed or denied by the use of a disjunctive judgment.
According to the above definition, which of the following is not belong to dilemma reasoning?
If the beating is against the law, it will be punished by the law; If the beating does not violate the law, it should be condemned by public opinion. The act of beating people either violates the law, or does not violate the law, so either to be punished by the law, or to be condemned by public opinion.