The true scientific significance of a group of unusual fossils discovered by the paleontologist Charles Walcott is more likely to be reflected in a recent classification than it was in Walcott' s own classification  Walcott was, after all, a prominent member of the scientific establishment
His classifications are thus unlikely to have done anything but confirm what established science had already taken to be true
It cites two pieces of evidence, each of which is both questionable and unverifiable, and uses this evidence to support its conclusions.