Using cultural prose to name a prose style and a subsequent prose creation phenomenon at the end of 1980s is in fact lack of theoretical support, because this naming can not explain the relationship between culture and prose, prose and great prose. However, it does more or less reveal the main features of a prose style, and obviously contains the planning behavior to adapt to the reader market. therefore, the naming of cultural prose has successfully seduced and guided quite a lot of prose writers. readers and researchers. Now, when I understand and respect the naming of cultural prose in my writing, I can't help but point out that the success of a simple naming brings convenience to the production and dissemination of knowledge, but also connives at the laziness of thought.
tent with the original text?
Changed people's perception of prose