If you think that what is true for the part must be true for the whole, then you are guilty of the composition fallacy. The composition fallacy theory explains how individual rationality is deduced into group irrationality, and the argument goes from less to more, The theory of the transformation process of behavior. The decomposition fallacy is the opposite of the composition fallacy. It argues that if the whole or set has a certain property, then every part or element of it must also have this property. It fails to realize that the whole and the part There is no such conversion relationship between.
According to the above definition, which of the followings is not a composition fallacy?
If a farmer has a bumper harvest, his income will increase, then all farmers will have a bumper harvest and everyone will be rich together