In fact, there is no absolutely correct standard answer to the interpretation of life, morality, aesthetics and society. Every era, every nation, has the impulse to ask questions and the ability to solve problems. What meets this historical need is the so-called appropriate scholarship. You can laugh at Hu Shi's shallowness, saying that his experimentalism is rather shallow, even less elaborate than Babbitt's new humanism promoted by the Xueheng School, but useless, the latter is not as good as the former to suit the taste of the Chinese people of that era.
t of the statement above?
The relationship between reality and theory