If logic comes from a priori, that is, logic transcends experience and exists before experience, then whether there is abstract logic that transcends concrete things if there is, how can we infer that many logicians often prove the transcendental nature of logic with propositions such as the sum of interior angles of triangles equal to 180 degrees-nature, especially as a symbolic system of mathematical logic.It seems that logical forms can have the self-consistency and eternal correctness of reasoning without relying on people's experience, and things in the objective world must be arranged through logical arrangement in order to make people have a clear and systematic understanding. If this is the case, we cannot help but ask how human beings, as empirical beings, know that there is no doubt that there is a logic that transcends experience, and that acknowledging the existence of transcendental logic is bound to fall into the quagmire of dogmatism or the rut of mysticism.
text?
Questioning the existence of transcendental logic