I have always been in favor of non-resistance, but because I am a little bit negative, I dare not implement it. Now when I think about it, this view is really absurd. Why? Because non-resistance is negative in face and the most economically positive in the bottom. We want to be effective in doing things. If we do not implement this doctrine, we will inevitably consume the spirit in useless places. We must preserve the spirit and use it in the right place. You have to save some where you don't have to. This is negative and positive: there is no negative, there is no positive.
the above text mainly tells us?
Non resistance seems to be negative, but in fact it is positive