As the environmental public interest litigation is aimed at many individuals, the polluter and the same player have higher transaction costs, in the case of the previous lack of environmental public interest litigation channels, it is very difficult for the polluted party to obtain compensation under the condition of high transaction cost, that is, it is impossible to form a cooperative game between the two parties. In the new legal environment, the possible changes are. Taking into account the possibility of public interest litigation, the polluters take a more cooperative stand. In this regard, around environmental issues, the two sides are more likely to reach a cooperative game, that is, the polluters distribute part of the pollution benefits to the polluted parties. From the welfare results, when the transaction costs are fixed, the total benefits of cooperation are greater than those of non-cooperation.
text?
The new legal measures make it possible to distribute the income from pollution reasonably