
Passage: Pascal, a modern French thinker, once argued that either there was a Christian God or there was no Christian God. If you believe that God exists and live in a Christian way, then if God does exist, you will have endless blessings: if God does not exist, you will have very little to lose. But suppose you don't believe that God exists and don't live in a Christian way. If God doesn't exist, you have nothing to lose: if God does exist, you will be punished endlessly. So don't hesitate, choose to believe in God and live in a Christian way.
Question: Which of the following options best illustrates the loophole in the logic of this argument?
A. A.This argument mistakenly presupposes that one can choose whether to believe or not to believe in God at will.
B. B.Pascal changed the quality of faith and turned it into a matter of calculation of the self-interest.
C. C.If God does not exist, we choose to believe in God, which will lead to our wrong understanding of the world and muddle through our lives.
D. D.There are many religions in this world, each of which has powerful gods (gods) and they all impose unlimited punishments on those who do not believe in themselves.
Answer: