
Passage: From the late 1980s to the early 1990s, a total of 134 working staff died in seven research institutes of cas and Peking University within five years. After collecting this data, some people concluded that the average age of death of intellectuals in Zhongguancun was 53.34 years old, lower than the average life expectancy of 73 years in Beijing in 1990, and 5.18 years lower than the 58.52 years surveyed 10 years ago.
Question: Which of the following most accurately points out the fallacy of this statistical reasoning?
A. A.The actual situation was 143 in-service deaths, and the sample data were unreliable.
B. B.If the sample size is too small, the data on the deaths of staff in other research institutions and universities in Zhongguancun should be added.
C. C.This is equivalent to finding out that the average age of death for college students is 22, and the shocking conclusion is that those with college education live 50 years less than others.
D. D.This statistical reasoning did not make a type distinction among zhongguancun intellectuals.
Answer: