Question: What would be the change in pension obligation between 2018 and 2019 if the pension obligation in 2019 was $15,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 11698

Context:
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – (continued) (in thousands, except per share amounts) Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to be reversed. Significant deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following: Of the $32.7 million and $40.2 million net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, $42.7 million and $47.1 million is reflected as a net non-current deferred tax asset and $10.0 million and $7.0 million is reflected as a long-term liability at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has recorded a valuation allowance on $16.0 million of its U.S. domestic deferred tax assets, largely attributable to acquired federal capital loss carryforwards for which the Company does not have sufficient income in the character to realize that attribute, and state carryforward attributes that are expected to expire before sufficient income can be realized in those jurisdictions. The remaining valuation allowance on deferred tax assets approximates $60.2 million and is associated primarily with operations in Austria, Germany, Hong Kong and Switzerland. As of December 31, 2019, there is not sufficient positive evidence to conclude that such deferred tax assets, presently reduced by a valuation allowance, will be recognized. The December 31, 2019 valuation allowance balance reflects an increase of $45.3 million during the year. The change in the valuation allowance is primarily due to increases from acquired Artesyn positions and current year activity, partially offset by decreases due to foreign exchange movements

	Years Ended December 31,

	2019	2018

Deferred tax assets

Stock based compensation	$1,757	$1,337

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards	86,879	38,622

Interest expense limitation	7,620	—

Pension obligation	13,473	3,302

Excess and obsolete inventory	3,217	2,161

Deferred revenue	3,305	6,903

Employee bonuses and commissions	2,537	1,874

Depreciation and amortization	29,015	29,525

Operating lease liabilities	23,451	—

Other	9,685	9,961

Deferred tax assets	180,939	93,685

Less: Valuation allowance	(76,206)	(30,924)

Net deferred tax assets	104,733	62,761

Deferred tax liabilities

Depreciation and amortization	41,549	17,723

Unremitted earnings	4,740	3,529

Operating lease right-of-use assets	22,774	—

Other	2,966	1,267

Deferred tax liabilities	72,029	22,519

Net deferred tax assets	$32,704	$40,242


Question: What would be the change in Excess and obsolete inventory between 2018 and 2019 if the excess and obsolete inventory in 2019 was $5,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 2839


Question: What would be the percentage change in Net deferred tax assets between 2018 and 2019 if the net deferred tax assets in 2019 was $40,000 thousand instead?

Answer: -0.6


Question: If Net cash provided by investing activities in 2019 was 7,000 thousands, in which year would it be less than 10,000 thousands?

Answer: 2019

Answer: 2018

Context:
Liquidity and Capital Resources Our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments consist primarily of money market funds and U.S. treasury bills. All of our short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale. The securities are stated at market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, within stockholders’ equity. As of December 31, 2019, our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments totaled $89.5 million, a decrease of $35.4 million from $124.9 million on December 31, 2018. A summary of select cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 (in thousands): 2019 Compared to 2018 Cash provided by (used in) operating activities - Net cash used in operating activities was $34.1 million during 2019 compared to $69.9 million cash provided by operating activities during 2018, primarily due to a $74.4 million decrease in net income, a $25.6 million decrease in deferred revenue, a $4.2 million increase in other assets, a $2.1 million increase in accounts and other receivables and a $0.9 million decrease in accrued compensation partially offset by a $3.8 million increase in other long-term liabilities. The decrease in deferred revenue primarily reflects the effect of the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018. Cash used in operating activities was also affected by a $0.5 million decrease in non-cash charges primarily related to a $3.2 million decrease in stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by a $0.9 million impairment charge related to the SJ Facility right-of-use lease asset and a $1.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is due primarily to amortization of right-of-use lease assets and the shortened useful life of the SJ Facility leasehold improvements and a $0.3 million increase in deferred income taxes. Cash provided by investing activities - Net cash provided by investing activities during 2019 was $10.9 million, a decrease of $2.7 million compared to $8.2 million cash provided by investing activities during 2018. Net cash provided by investing activities during 2019 consisted of maturities of short-term investments of $20.0 million. This was partially offset by purchases of short-term investments of $8.9 million and purchases of property, plant and equipment of $0.2 million. Net cash provided by investing activities during 2018 consisted of maturities of short-term investments of $26.0 million. This was partially offset by purchases of short-term investments of $17.7 million and purchases of property, plant, and equipment of $0.1 million. Cash provided by financing activities — Net cash provided by financing activities during 2019 was $1.3 million, a decrease of $9.5 million compared to $8.2 million cash provided by financing activities during 2018. Net cash used in financing activities during 2019 consisted of $2.7 million used to purchase of treasury stock partially offset by $1.4 million in cash proceeds from stock option exercises and stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2018 consisted primarily of $8.2 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. 2018 Compared to 2017 Cash provided by (used in) operating activities - Net cash provided by operating activities was $69.9 million during 2018 compared to $43.8 million cash used in operating activities during 2017. The $113.8 million change was primarily driven by $99.6 million increase in net income (loss), from $45.3 million net loss for 2017 to $54.3 million net income for 2018 and $27.0 million increase in deferred revenue, partially offset by $7.0 million increase in other assets, $4.2 million increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and $3.7 million decrease in accounts payable. The increases in deferred revenue and other non-current assets primarily reflected the effect of the adoption of ASC 606 on January 1, 2018. Cash provided by operating activities was also affected by an increase in non-cash charges of $2.6 million primarily related to higher stock-based compensation expense incurred for 2018 compared to 2017. Cash provided by (used in) investing activities - Net cash provided by investing activities during 2018 was $8.2 million, a decrease of $2.8 million compared to $11.1 million cash provided by investing activities during 2017. Net cash provided by investing activities during 2018 consisted of maturities of short-term investments of $26.0 million partially offset by purchases of short-term investments of $17.7 million and purchases of property, plant and equipment of $0.1 million. Net cash provided by investing activities during 2017 consisted of maturities of short-term investments of $35.0 million partially offset by purchases of short-term investments of $23.8 million and purchases of property, plant, and equipment of $0.1 million. Cash provided by (used in) financing activities - Net cash provided by financing activities during 2018 was $8.2 million an increase of $7.7 million compared to $0.5 million net cash provided by financing activities during 2017. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2018 consisted primarily of $8.2 million in proceeds from stock option exercises and stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan. Net cash provided by financing activities during 2017 consisted primarily of $0.8 million proceeds from stock option exercises and stock purchases under our employee stock purchase plan partially offset by repurchases of treasury stock of $0.3 million. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. Of our total cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments of $89.5 million as of December 31, 2019, 5% was held by our foreign subsidiaries and subject to repatriation tax effects. Our intent is to permanently reinvest all of our earnings from foreign operations, and current plans do not anticipate that we will need funds generated from foreign operations to fund our domestic operations. We will continue to invest in, protect, and defend our extensive IP portfolio, which is expected to result in the continued use of cash. At December 31, 2019 there was $30.6 million remaining under our previously-approved share repurchase program. We anticipate that capital expenditures for property and equipment for the year ending December 31, 2020 will be less than $1.0 million. Cash from operations could also be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to the risks detailed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

		Years Ended December 31,

	2019	2018	2017

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$(34,099)	$69,924	$(43,829)

Net cash provided by investing activities	$10,920	$8,237	$11,068

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	$(1,331)	$8,205	$518


Question: If Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities in 2019 was 75,000 thousands, what would be the change from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 5076


Question: If Net cash provided by investing activities in 2019 was 5,000 thousands, what would be the average from 2017-2019?

Answer: 8101.67


Question: If the Interest before impact of interest rate caps in Years Ended December 31, 2019 increased to 28,971, what would be the revised change from Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?

Answer: -1738

Context:
INTEREST EXPENSE The components of interest expense are as follows: Interest expense, including administrative and other fees, was $25,633 for 2019 compared with $30,890 in 2018. The decrease in interest expense was primarily associated with the impact of the refinancing of our term loan at the end of 2018 and interest capitalized during 2019 due to vessels under construction.

	Years Ended December 31,

	2019	2018

Interest before impact of interest rate caps	$25,633	$30,709

Impact of interest rate caps	—	181

Interest expense	$25,633	$30,890


Question: If the Interest expense in Years Ended December 31, 2019 increased to 26,009, what would be the revised change from Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?

Answer: -4881


Question: If the Interest before impact of interest rate caps in Years Ended December 31, 2019 increased to 28,971, what would be the revised average for Years Ended December 31, 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 29840


Question: What would be the average value of buildings and building improvements in 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2019 decreased by $100 thousand?

Answer: 2691

Context:
7. Property, Plant and Equipment and Leases Property, plant and equipment at April 30, 2019 and 2018, consisted of the following (in thousands): Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was $2,802,000 and $2,484,000, respectively. Maintenance and repairs charged to operations for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $309,000 and $466,000, respectively. The Company leases its Long Island, New York headquarters building. On July 25, 2018, the Company signed an amendment to the lease which extends the current lease terms ten years and eight months through September 30, 2029. Pursuant to the amendment to the lease agreement, the annual rent will increase from $1,046,810 in 2019 to $1,276,056 in 2029. Under the terms of the lease, the Company is required to pay its proportionate share of real estate taxes, insurance and other charges. In addition, the Company’s subsidiaries in New Jersey and California lease their office and manufacturing facilities. On February 1, 2018, FEI-Elcom entered into a new lease agreement in New Jersey for office and manufacturing space encompassing approximately 9,000 square feet. The monthly rent is $9,673 through the end of the lease which expires in January 31, 2021. FEI-Zyfer has signed a second amendment to its lease in California, which extends the lease an additional 88 months, beginning October 1, 2017 and expiring January 31, 2025. The average annual rent over the period of the amendment is approximately $312,000. FEI-Zyfer leases office and manufacturing space encompassing 27,850 square feet. Rent expense under operating leases for the years ended April 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The Company records rent expense on its New York building and FEI-Zyfer facility on the straight-line method over the lives of the respective leases. As a result, as of April 30, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet included deferred rent payable of approximately $236,000 and $110,000, respectively, which will be recognized over the respective rental periods.

	2019	2018

Buildings and building improvements	$2,692	$2,790

Machinery, equipment and furniture	57,157	57,503

	59,849	60,293

Less, accumulated depreciation	(46,811 )	(46,166)

	$13,038	$ 14,127


Question: What would be the change between the value of machinery, equipment and furniture between 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2018 increased by $10,000 thousand?

Answer: -10346


Question: What would be the total maintenance and repairs charged to operations for 2018 and 2019 if the value in 2018 decreased by $100,000?

Answer: 675000


Question: What would be the amortized cost that was due in one year or less as a ratio of the fair value for the same period if the fair value was $900 million instead?

Answer: 0.66

Context:
The following table presents the contractual maturities of our debt investments as of April 26, 2019 (in millions): Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay certain obligations.

	Amortized Cost	Fair Value

Due in one year or less	$ 591	$ 589

Due after one year through five years	644	642

Due after five years through ten years	455	452

	$ 1,690	$ 1,683


Question: What would be the difference between the amortized cost and fair value that was due after five years through ten years if the fair value was $300 million instead?

Answer: 155


Question: What would be the difference in the total  amortized cost and fair value if the total amortized cost was $2,000 million instead?

Answer: 317


Question: If the total selling, general and administrative expense increases to 200,000, what would the specialty egg be as a percentage of total?

Answer: 26.63

Context:
SELLING, GENERAL, AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES Payroll and overhead increased $1.2 million, or 3.1%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to annual salary increases. As a percentage of net sales, payroll and overhead is 2.8% and 2.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, delivery expense is 3.9% and 3.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other expenses decreased $5.2 million, or 16.7%, primarily due to reduced legal expense as a result of the Company's settlement of several antitrust claims in the prior year. The fiscal 2018 amount also included costs associated with preparation for the Company's special shareholders meeting held in July 2018. Insurance expense, which is also a part of other expenses, was flat year over year due to decreases in the Company's liability for incurred but not reported claims being offset by overall increases in premiums for fiscal 2019 compared with fiscal 2018. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A"), which include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting and corporate overhead, were $174.8 million in fiscal 2019, a decrease of $4.5 million, or 2.5%, compared to fiscal 2018. As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 11.9% in fiscal 2018 to 12.8% in fiscal 2019, due to the decrease in net sales in fiscal 2019. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A"), which include costs of marketing, distribution, accounting and corporate overhead, were $174.8 million in fiscal 2019, a decrease of $4.5 million, or 2.5%, compared to fiscal 2018. As a percent of net sales, selling, general and administrative expense increased from 11.9% in fiscal 2018 to 12.8% in fiscal 2019, due to the decrease in net sales in fiscal 2019. Payroll and overhead increased $1.2 million, or 3.1%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to annual salary increases. As a percentage of net sales, payroll and overhead is 2.8% and 2.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, delivery expense is 3.9% and 3.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other expenses decreased $5.2 million, or 16.7%, primarily due to reduced legal expense as a result of the Company's settlement of several antitrust claims in the prior year. The fiscal 2018 amount also included costs associated with preparation for the Company's special shareholders meeting held in July 2018. Insurance expense, which is also a part of other expenses, was flat year over year due to decreases in the Company's liability for incurred but not reported claims being offset by overall increases in premiums for fiscal 2019 compared with fiscal 2018. Payroll and overhead increased $1.2 million, or 3.1%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to annual salary increases. As a percentage of net sales, payroll and overhead is 2.8% and 2.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, delivery expense is 3.9% and 3.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other expenses decreased $5.2 million, or 16.7%, primarily due to reduced legal expense as a result of the Company's settlement of several antitrust claims in the prior year. The fiscal 2018 amount also included costs associated with preparation for the Company's special shareholders meeting held in July 2018. Insurance expense, which is also a part of other expenses, was flat year over year due to decreases in the Company's liability for incurred but not reported claims being offset by overall increases in premiums for fiscal 2019 compared with fiscal 2018. Payroll and overhead increased $1.2 million, or 3.1%, compared to the same period of last year primarily due to annual salary increases. As a percentage of net sales, payroll and overhead is 2.8% and 2.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. As a percentage of net sales, delivery expense is 3.9% and 3.5% for fiscal 2019 and 2018, respectively. Other expenses decreased $5.2 million, or 16.7%, primarily due to reduced legal expense as a result of the Company's settlement of several antitrust claims in the prior year. The fiscal 2018 amount also included costs associated with preparation for the Company's special shareholders meeting held in July 2018. Insurance expense, which is also a part of other expenses, was flat year over year due to decreases in the Company's liability for incurred but not reported claims being offset by overall increases in premiums for fiscal 2019 compared with fiscal 2018. SG&A expense was $42.3 million for the thirteen weeks ended June 1, 2019, a decrease of $7.4 million, or 14.8%, compared to $49.7 million for the thirteen weeks ended June 2, 2018. The decrease in specialty egg expense for the fiscal 2019 fourth quarter is attributable to the timing of advertising and promotions as well as a decrease in specialty egg dozens sold resulting in decreased franchise expense. Payroll and overhead decreased $526,000, or 5.2%, compared to the same period of last year due to timing of bonus accruals. Stock compensation expense relates to the amortization of compensation expense for grants of restricted stock and is dependent on the closing prices of the Company's stock on the grant dates. The weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards at June 1, 2019, was $43.20, a 2.1% increase over the value of $42.30 at June 2, 2018. Other expenses decreased 27.6% from $8.4 million for the thirteen weeks ended June 2, 2018 to $6.1 million for the same period of fiscal 2019 primarily due to a reduction in the liability for incurred but not reported insurance claims at June 1, 2019 as well as a reduction in legal expenses.

	Fiscal Years Ended

(Amounts in thousands)	June 1, 2019	June 2, 2018	Change	Percent Change

Specialty egg	$53,263	$54,300	$(1,037)	(1.9)%

Delivery expense	53,595	53,177	418	0.8%

Payroll and overhead	38,343	37,191	1,152	3.1%

Stock compensation	3,619	3,467	152	4.4%

Other expenses	25,975	31,181	(5,206)	(16.7)%

Total	$174,795	$179,316	$(4,521)	(2.5)%


Question: If the other expenses increases by 15% and the total cost unchanges, what will be the percentage as a part of total cost?

Answer: 17.09


Question: If the stock compensation increases by 10%, what will be the revised total cost?

Answer: 175156.9


Question: What would be the difference in Goodwill between Duo and Luxtera if the Goodwill for Luxtera was $1,000 million instead?

Answer: 740

Context:
4. Acquisitions and Divestitures (a) Acquisition Summary We completed five acquisitions during fiscal 2019. A summary of the allocation of the total purchase consideration is presented as follows (in millions): On September 28, 2018, we completed our acquisition of privately held Duo Security, Inc. (“Duo”), a leading provider of unified access security and multi-factor authentication delivered through the cloud. Revenue from the Duo acquisition has been included in our Security product category. On February 6, 2019, we completed our acquisition of Luxtera, Inc. (“Luxtera”), a privately held semiconductor company. Revenue from the Luxtera acquisition has been included in our Infrastructure Platforms product category. The total purchase consideration related to our acquisitions completed during fiscal 2019 consisted of cash consideration and vested share-based awards assumed. The total cash and cash equivalents acquired from these acquisitions was approximately $100 million.

Fiscal 2019	Purchase Consideration	Net Tangible Assets Acquired (Liabilities Assumed)	Purchased Intangible Assets	Goodwill

Duo	$2,025	$(57)	$342	$1,740

Luxtera	596	(19)	319	296

Others (three in total)	65	2	11	52

Total	$2,686	$(74)	$672	$2,088


Question: What would be the difference in Purchased intangible assets between Luxtera and Others if the purchased intangible assets for Others was $300 million instead?

Answer: 19


Question: What would be the acquisition with the highest Purchase Consideration if purchase consideration for Luxtera was 3,000 million?

Answer: Luxtera


Question: What would be the percentage change in ingredients between 2018 and 2019 if the value of ingredients in 2019 increased by 100?

Answer: 29.24

Context:
Note 3 – Inventories, net Inventories consisted of the following:

		December 31,

	2019	2018

Ingredients	$ 1,942	$ 1,580

Packaging	2,230	2,072

Finished goods	2,220	2,165

Total inventories, net	$ 6,392	$ 5,817


Question: What would be the change in finished goods between 2018 and 2019 if the value of finished goods in 2019 increased by 1,000?

Answer: 1055


Question: What would be the average value of packaging for years 2018 and 2019 if the value of packaging in 2019 decreased by 100?

Answer: 2101


Question: What is the difference in short-term employee benefits between 2018 and 2019 if the short-term employee benefits in 2019 is 12,000,000?

Answer: 2217931

Context:
This section highlights the Group’s transactions with its related parties, such as its subsidiaries and Key Management Personnel. During the reporting period and previous reporting periods, Woolworths Group Limited advanced loans to, received and repaid loans from, and provided treasury, accounting, legal, taxation, and administrative services to other entities within the Group. Entities within the Group also exchanged goods and services in sale and purchase transactions. All transactions occurred on the basis of normal commercial terms and conditions. Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this note. All transactions with directors and Key Management Personnel (including their related parties) were conducted on an arm’s length basis in the ordinary course of business and under normal terms and conditions for customers and employees. Related parties of Key Management Personnel who are employees received normal employee benefits on standard terms and conditions. The total remuneration for Key Management Personnel of the Group is as follows: Details of equity instruments provided as compensation to Key Management Personnel and shares issued on exercise of these instruments, together with the terms and conditions of the instruments, are disclosed in the Remuneration Report.

	2019	2018

	$	$

Short-term employee benefits	12,175,184	14,217,931

Post employment benefits	322,733	297,319

Other long-term benefits	161,569	139,776

Share-based payments	9,177,425	6,594,300

	21,836,911	21,249,326


Question: What is the average post employment benefits for 2018 and 2019 if the post employment benefits in 2019 is 300,000?

Answer: 298659.5


Question: What is the difference in the total remuneration for Key Management Personnel of the Group between 2018 and 2019 if the total remuneration in 2019 is 22,000,000?

Answer: 750674


Question: If Cost of revenue in 2017 was -600 thousands, in which years would it be negative?

Answer: 2018

Answer: 2017

Context:
Discontinued Operations On October 27, 2017, we entered into a purchase agreement to sell the Compute business. In consideration for the transfer and sale of the Compute business, we received an equity interest in the buyer valued at approximately $36.5 million, representing the carrying value of the assets divested and representing less than 20.0% of the buyer's total outstanding equity. The operations of the Compute business were accounted for as discontinued operations through the date of divestiture. We also entered into a transition services agreement (the "Compute TSA"), pursuant to which we agreed to perform certain primarily general and administrative functions on the buyer's behalf during a migration period and for which we are reimbursed for costs incurred. During the fiscal year 2019, we received $0.1 million of reimbursements under the Compute TSA, which was recorded as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses. During the fiscal year 2018, we received $3.6 million of reimbursements under the Compute TSA, which was recorded as a reduction of our general and administrative expenses. In August of fiscal year 2015, we sold our Automotive business, as the Automotive business was not consistent with our long-term strategic vision from both a growth and profitability perspective. Additionally, we entered into a Consulting Agreement with the buyer pursuant to which we were to provide the buyer with certain non-design advisory services for a period of two years following the closing of the transaction for up to $15.0 million, from which we have recorded $7.5 million as other income during both fiscal years 2017 and 2016. No income was recognized during fiscal years 2019 or 2018. During fiscal year 2017, we received $18.0 million, the full amount of the indemnification escrow. The accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations includes the following operating results related to these discontinued operations (in thousands): (1) Amounts are associated with the Compute business. (2) Amounts are associated with the Automotive business.

	Fiscal Years

	2018	2017

Revenue (1)	$—	$660

Cost of revenue (1)	(596)	2,252

Gross profit (loss)	596	(1,592)

Operating expenses:

Research and development (1)	5,251	29,167

Selling, general and administrative (1)	1,560	13,840

Total operating expenses	6,811	43,007

Loss from discontinued operations (1)	(6,215)	(44,599)

Other income (2)	—	7,500

Gain on sale (2)	—	18,022

Loss income before income taxes	(6,215)	(19,077)

Income tax provision (benefit)	—	—

Loss income from discontinued operations	(6,215)	(19,077)

Cash flow used in Operating Activities (1)	(10,734)	(42,776)

Cash flow from Investing Activities (2)	—	25,522


Question: If Research and development in 2018 was 30,000 thousands, what would be the average for 2017 and 2018?

Answer: 29583.5


Question: If Selling, general and administrative expense in 2018 was 15,000 thousands, what would be the change from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 1160


Question: What would the total base salary of all Named Executive Officers in 2018 be if Gary Staley's base salary was $400,000 instead?

Answer: 2382000

Context:
Base Salary. The base salary for each NEO is determined on the basis of the following factors: scope of responsibilities, experience, skills, performance, expected future contribution, base salary levels in effect for comparable positions at the companies in the Peer Group (as described on page 42 below under “Use of Peer Group Compensation Data”) and other competitive market factors. Generally, the Committee reviews the base salary levels of our NEOs annually as part of the Company’s performance review process as well as upon a promotion or other change of position or level of responsibility. Merit-based increases to the base salaries of our NEOs (other than our CEO) are recommended by our CEO to the Committee, and all increases are based on the Committee’s (and in the case of our CEO, the Board’s) review and assessment of the factors described above. The Compensation Committee reviews compensation levels at the beginning of each fiscal year and adjusts as needed based upon market data and executive achievement. The Committee reviewed the base salaries of our executive officers, including our NEOs, for fiscal year 2019 and increased the salaries of our CEO and CFO in light of their contributions in fiscal year 2018, including, among other considerations, the successful execution and integration of the AvComm and Wireless acquisition and to reflect the Committee’s review of current peer and market compensation data. Mr. Staley’s salary was also increased to reflect the Committee’s review of current peer and market compensation data as well as his contributions in fiscal year 2019, including the integration of AvComm and Wireless sales into our global sales organization. The Committee did not increase the salaries of any of our other NEOs because the Committee determined that the existing base salaries were appropriate for each of these NEOs. Actual base salaries paid to our NEOs in fiscal year 2019 are set forth in the “Salary” column of the Fiscal 2019 Summary Compensation Table on page 44.

	Fiscal Year 2018	Fiscal Year 2019

Named Executive Officer	Base Salary	Base Salary	Percentage Increase

Oleg Khaykin	$750,000	$800,000	6.7%

Amar Maletira	$425,000	$500,000	17.7%

Paul McNab	$435,000	$435,000	—

Luke Scrivanich	$372,000	$372,000	—

Gary Staley	$360,000	$375,000	4.2%


Question: How much would the top 3 base salaries in 2019 add up to be if Luke Scrivanich's base salary was $600,000 instead?

Answer: 1900000


Question: What would the difference in base salary between Paul McNab and Luke Scrivanch in 2018 be if Luke Scrivanch's base salary was $400,000 instead?

Answer: 35000


Question: If the net revenues from OEM in 2019 is increased to 86%, what is the revised average for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?

Answer: 77.5

Context:
Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEM”) are the end-customers to which we provide direct marketing application engineering support, while Distribution customers refers to the distributors and representatives that we engage to distribute our products around the world. By market channel, our fourth quarter revenues in Distribution amounted to 28% of our total revenues, flat compared to the previous quarter and decreasing on a year-over-year basis.

		Three Months Ended

	December 31, 2019	September 29, 2019	December 31, 2018

		(Unaudited, in %)

OEM	72%	72%	69%

Distribution	28	28	31

Total	100%	100%	100%


Question: If the net revenues from Distribution in 2019 is increased to 34% million, what is the revised average for the period December 31, 2019 and 2018?

Answer: 32.5


Question: What would be the increase/ (decrease) if OEM in 2019 is increased to 86%?

Answer: 17


Question: If external gross profit changed to 6,000 million in 2018, what is the increase / (decrease) from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 1967

Context:
* Recast to reflect segment changes. The year-to-year improvements in margins and pre-tax income in GBS were the result of the shift to higher-value offerings, realignment of resources to key skill areas, increased productivity and utilization as well as a benefit from currency, due to the company’s global delivery model.

($ in millions)

For the year ended December 31:	2018*	2017*	Yr.-to-Yr. Percent/ Margin Change

Global Business Services

External gross profit	$4,448	$4,033	10.3%

External gross profit margin	26.8%	25.1%	1.7pts

Pre-tax income	$1,629	$1,303	25.0%

Pre-tax margin	9.6%	7.9%	1.7pts


Question: If the Pre-tax income in 2018 changed to 2,000 million, what is the average?

Answer: 1651.5


Question: If Pre-tax margin in 2018 changed to 10.0%, what is the increase / (decrease) from 2017 to 2018?

Answer: 2.1


Question: In which year would the amount of Other be larger if the amount in 2018 was 1.7 million instead?

Answer: 2018

Context:
The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables at the reporting date by type of customer was: The Group’s most significant customer accounts for £0.5m (2018: £0.6m) of net trade receivables as at 31 March 2019.

	2019	2018

	£m	£m

Retailers	20.4	21.7

Manufacturer and Agency	3.2	3.0

Other	1.3	0.7

Total	24.9	25.4


Question: What would the change in Other in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 1.4 million instead?

Answer: 0.7


Question: What would the percentage change in Other in 2019 from 2018 be if the amount in 2019 was 1.4 million instead?

Answer: 100


Question: What would the percentage change in the income before income taxes from United States from 2017 to 2018 be if the amount in 2018 was 130,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 1621.17

Context:
Note 7: Income Taxes On December 22, 2017, the “Tax Cuts & Jobs Act” was signed into law and was effective for the Company starting in the quarter ended December 24, 2017. U.S. tax reform reduced the U.S. federal statutory tax rate from 35% to 21%, assessed a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, and created new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. The impact on income taxes due to a change in legislation is required under the authoritative guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 740, Income Taxes, to be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. In conjunction, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 118, which allowed for the recording of provisional amounts related to U.S. tax reform and subsequent adjustments related to U.S. tax reform during an up to one-year measurement period that is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. The Company recorded what it believed to be reasonable estimates during the SAB 118 measurement period. During the December 2018 quarter, the Company finalized the accounting of the income tax effects of U.S. tax reform. Although the SAB 118 measurement period has ended, there may be some aspects of U.S. tax reform that remain subject to future regulations and/or notices which may further clarify certain provisions of U.S. tax reform. The Company may need to adjust its previously recorded amounts to reflect the recognition and measurement of its tax accounting positions in accordance with ASC 740; such adjustments could be material. The computation of the one-time transition tax on accumulated unrepatriated foreign earnings was recorded on a provisional basis in the amount of $883.0 million in the fiscal year ended June 24, 2018, as permitted under SAB 118. The Company recorded a subsequent provisional adjustment of $36.6 million, as a result of incorporating new information into the estimate, in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the three months ended September 23, 2018. The Company finalized the computation of the transition tax liability during the December 2018 quarter. The final adjustment resulted in a tax benefit of $51.2 million, which was recorded in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the three months ended December 23, 2018. The final balance of total transition tax is $868.4 million. The one-time transition tax is based on the Company’s total post-1986 earnings and profits (“E&P”) that was previously deferred from U.S. income taxes. The Company had previously accrued deferred taxes on a portion of this E&P. The Company has completed the calculation of total post-1986 E&P and related income tax pools for its foreign subsidiaries. The Company elected to pay the one-time transition tax over a period of eight years. Beginning in fiscal year 2019, the Company is subject to the impact of the GILTI provision of U.S. tax reform. The GILTI provision imposes taxes on foreign earnings in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets. The Company has calculated the impact of the GILTI provision on current year earnings and has included the impact in the effective tax rate. The Company made an accounting policy election in the September 2018 quarter to record deferred taxes in relation to the GILTI provision, and recorded a provisional tax benefit of $48.0 million in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the three months ended September 23, 2018, under SAB 118. The Company finalized the computation of the accounting policy election during the December 2018 quarter. The final adjustment resulted in a tax expense of $0.4 million, which was recorded in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in the three months ended December 23, 2018. The final tax benefit of the election is $47.6 million. The components of income (loss) before income taxes were as follows:

		YearEnded

	June 30, 2019	June 24, 2018	June 25, 2017

		(in thousands)

United States	$(59,876)	$128,190	$7,553

Foreign	2,506,447	3,023,599	1,804,120

	$2,446,571	$3,151,789	$1,811,673


Question: What would the percentage change in the income before income taxes from Foreign countries from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 3,000,000 thousand instead?

Answer: -0.78


Question: In which year would the income before income taxes from Foreign countries be the highest if the amount in 2017 was 3,100,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 2017


Question: What would be the difference between the company's federal and state net operating losses if the state losses is doubled and then increased by $5,000,000?

Answer: 109048

Context:
At December 31, 2019, the Company’s net operating losses and credit carryforwards are: (1) Excludes federal and state net operating losses of $60.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively, from prior acquisitions that the Company expects will expire unutilized (2) Excludes federal and state tax credits of $0.1 million and $8.3 million, respectively, that the Company expects will expire unutilized Carryforward losses and credits expire between 2020 and 2038, except for the 2019 federal net operating loss of $43.9 million and $1 million of state credits, which both have unlimited carryforward periods. The Company’s India subsidiary is primarily located in Special Economic Zones (“SEZs”) and is entitled to a tax holiday in India. The tax holiday reduces or eliminates income tax in India. The tax holiday in the Hyderabad SEZ is scheduled to expire in 2024. The tax holiday in the Bangalore SEZ is scheduled to expire in 2022. For 2019, 2018 and 2017, the income tax holiday reduced the Company’s provision for income taxes by $1.9 million, $1.3 million, and $1 million, respectively.

(in thousands)	Federal	State

Net operating losses (1)	$120,722	$3,337

Net operating losses due to acquisitions (1)	$76,827	$778

Credit carryforwards (2)	$8,202	$1,958

Credit carryforwards due to acquisitions	$640	$227


Question: What would be the total federal and state credit carryforwards if the value of the state carryforwards is halved and then decreased by $50,000?

Answer: 9131


Question: What would be the average federal and state credit carryforwards due to acquisitions if the state credit carryforwards is decreased by $7,000?

Answer: 430


Question: If the total purchase obligations increased by 50000 thousand, what will be the new percentage of the of total purchase obligations in total contractual obligations?

Answer: 58.5

Context:
Contractual Obligations The following table presents the payments due by fiscal year for our outstanding contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands): (1) Includes estimated cash interest to be paid over the remaining terms of the underlying debt. Interest payments are based on fixed and floating rates as of December 31, 2019. (2) Purchase obligations represent agreements to purchase goods or services, including open purchase orders and contracts with fixed volume commitments, that are noncancelable or cancelable with a significant penalty. Purchase obligations for our long-term supply agreements for the purchase of substrate glass and cover glass represent specified termination penalties, which are up to $430 million in the aggregate under the agreements. Our actual purchases under these supply agreements are expected to be approximately $2.4 billion of substrate glass and $500 million of cover glass. (3) In connection with business or project acquisitions, we may agree to pay additional amounts to the selling parties upon achievement of certain milestones. See Note 14. “Commitments and Contingencies” to our consolidated financial statements for further information. (4) Transition tax obligations represent estimated payments for U.S. federal taxes associated with accumulated earnings and profits of our foreign corporate subsidiaries. See Note 18. “Income Taxes” to our consolidated financial statements for further information. (5) Includes expected letter of credit fees and unused revolver fees. We have excluded $72.2 million of unrecognized tax benefits from the amounts presented above as the timing of such obligations is uncertain.

			Payments Due by Year

		Less Than	1 - 3	3 - 5	More Than

	Total	1 Year	Years	Years	5 Years

Long-term debt obligations	$482,892	$17,684	$98,571	$37,496	$329,141

Interest payments (1) .	168,040	17,276	29,533	27,409	93,822

Operating lease obligations	162,913	15,153	28,771	26,708	92,281

Purchase obligations (2) .	1,424,267	900,200	221,888	187,277	114,902

Recycling obligations .	137,761	—	—	—	137,761

Contingent consideration (3) .	6,895	2,395	4,500	—	—

Transition tax obligations (4) .	76,667	6,620	14,747	32,259	23,041

Other obligations (5) .	10,527	2,933	5,164	2,430	—

Total .	$2,469,962	$962,261	$403,174	$313,579	$790,948


Question: If the total long-term debt obligations decreased by 50000 thousand, what will be the new percentage of total long-term debt obligations in total contractual obligations?

Answer: 17.89


Question: Suppose that total interest payments increased by 5000 thousand and total operating lease obligations decreased by 10000 thousand, what will be the difference between total interest payments and total operating lease obligations?

Answer: 20127


Question: What is the total Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems and Software & Subscription Services in 2019 if adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems was $30,000 thousand?

Answer: 43093

Context:
Profitability Measures Net Income: Our net income in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019 was $18.4 million as compared to net income of $16.6 million in the same period last year. The increase is due to a $11.7 million increase in operating income, $3.0 million increase in investment income and $12.0 million decrease in income tax provision. The increase in operating income was primarily attributable to $21.0 million decrease in general and administrative expense due to reduced legal provision and related costs as further discussed in Note 19 and partially offset by $8.0 million of restructuring expense. Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems in the fiscal year ended February 28, 2019 decreased $8.1 million compared to the same period last year due to lower revenues as described above and the impact of high margin revenue earned on a strategic technology partnership arrangement in fiscal 2018. These factors were coupled with higher operating expenses in Telematics Systems as a result of increased headcount and outsourced professional service fees. Adjusted EBITDA for Software and Subscription Services increased $4.9 million compared to the same period last year due primarily to continued growth in revenues and gross profit from our Italia market and higher gross profit from our fleet management services. See Note 20 for reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA by reportable segments and a reconciliation to GAAP-basis net income (loss).

	Fiscal years ended

	February 28,

(In thousands)	2019	2018	$ Change	% Change

	Segment

Telematics Systems	$40,821	$48,943	$(8,122)	(17.0%)

Software & Subscription Services	13,093	8,233	4,860	59.0%

Corporate Expense	(5,699)	(4,794)	(905)	19.0%

Total Adjusted EBITDA	$48,215	$52,382	$(4,167)	(8.0%)


Question: What is the total Adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems and Software & Subscription Services in 2018 if adjusted EBITDA for Telematics Systems was $30,000 thousand?

Answer: 38233


Question: What was the average Corporate Expense for both years, 2018 and 2019 if Corporate Expense for 2018 was $5,000 thousand?

Answer: -5349.5


Question: What would be the change in the Deferred expense for State between 2018 and 2019 if the Deferred expense  in 2019 was $1.0 million instead?

Answer: 0.9

Context:
Note 11. Income Taxes The income tax provision consists of the following (amounts in millions): On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Act") was enacted into law. The Act provides for numerous significant tax law changes and modifications including the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35.0% to 21.0%, the requirement for companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and the creation of new taxes on certain foreign-sourced earnings. Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740, Income Taxes, requires companies to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment. However, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118, which allowed companies to record provisional amounts during a measurement period that is similar to the measurement period used when accounting for business combinations. The Company recorded a reasonable estimate when measurable and with the understanding that the provisional amount was subject to further adjustments under SAB 118. In addition, for significant items for which the Company could not make a reasonable estimate, no provisional amounts were recorded. As of December 31, 2018, the Company completed its review of the previously recorded provisional amounts related to the Act, recorded necessary adjustments, and the amounts are now final under SAB 118. As of March 31, 2018, the Company remeasured certain deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they were expected to reverse in the future (which was generally 21%), by recording a provisional income tax benefit of $136.7 million. Upon further analysis of certain aspects of the Act and refinement of its calculations during the period ended December 31, 2018, the Company did not make adjustments to the provisional amount The one-time transition tax is based on the Company's total post-1986 earnings and profits (E&P), the tax on which the Company previously deferred from U.S. income taxes under U.S. law. The Company recorded a provisional amount for its one-time transition tax expense for each of its foreign subsidiaries, resulting in a transition tax expense of $644.7 million at March 31, 2018. Upon further analyses of the Act and notices and regulations issued and proposed by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service, the Company finalized its calculations of the transition tax expense during the period ended December 31, 2018. The Company increased its March 31, 2018 provisional amount by $13.1 million to $657.8 million, which is included as a component of income tax expense from continuing operations. The measurement period adjustment of $13.1 million decreased basic and diluted net income per common share by $0.06 and $0.05, respectively, for the year ended March 31, 2019. The Company intends to invest substantially all of its foreign subsidiary earnings, as well as its capital in its foreign subsidiaries, indefinitely outside of the U.S. in those jurisdictions in which the Company would incur significant, additional costs upon repatriation of such amounts. It is not practical to estimate the additional tax that would be incurred, if any, if the permanently reinvested earnings were repatriated.

		Year Ended March 31,

	2019	2018	2017

Pretax (loss) income:

U.S.	$(593.4)	$(127.3)	$(279.3)

Foreign	797.9	864.6	369.1

	$204.5	$737.3	$89.8

Current (benefit) expense:

U.S. Federal	$(98.0)	$369.4	$21.3

State	(5.3)	0.5	1.0

Foreign	14.1	60.8	23.8

Total current (benefit) expense	$(89.2)	$430.7	$46.1

Deferred expense (benefit):

U.S. Federal	$11.9	$82.5	$(114.7)

State	0.6	0.1	(5.4)

Foreign	(74.7)	(31.4)	(6.8)

Total deferred (benefit) expense	(62.2)	51.2	(126.9)

Total Income tax (benefit) provision	$(151.4)	$481.9	$(80.8)


Question: What would be the change in the Foreign Pretax  income between 2018 and 2019 if the foreign Pretax income in 2018 was $700 million instead?

Answer: 97.9


Question: What would be the percentage change in the Total current expense between 2017 and 2018 if the Total current expense in 2017 was $400 million instead?

Answer: 7.67


Question: If Beginning balance in 2019 was 320,000 thousands, what would be the change from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 9355

Context:
The following table sets forth activity during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 related to finite-lived intangible assets: The Company regularly reviews the carrying amounts of its long-lived assets subject to depreciation and amortization, as well as the related useful lives, to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist which warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. An impairment loss is recognized when the sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Should impairment exist, the impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over the asset’s fair value. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2017, no impairment losses related to finite-lived intangible assets were recognized. Impairment loss related to finite-lived intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2.2 million and related to acquired developed technology.

	Years Ended December 31,

	2019	2018

	(in thousands)

Beginning balance	$240,500	$310,645

Other additions	86	—

Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D	4,400	—

Amortization	(57,015)	(67,947)

Impairment losses	—	(2,198)

Ending balance	$187,971	240,500


Question: If other additions in 2018 was 90 thousands, what would be the average for 2018 and 2019?

Answer: 88


Question: If Transfers to developed technology from IPR&D in 2018 was 5,000 thousands, in which year would it be greater than 4,000 thousands?

Answer: 2019

Answer: 2018


Question: In which year would Construction in progress be larger if the amount in 2019 was $6,537 thousand instead?

Answer: 2019

Context:
G. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018: Depreciation of property, plant and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $70.8 million, $67.4 million, and $66.1 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the gross book value included in machinery and equipment for internally manufactured test systems being leased by customers was $5.4 million and $5.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the accumulated depreciation on these test systems was $5.1 million and $5.2 million, respectively.

	2019	2018

	(in thousands)

Land	$16,561	$16,561

Buildings	107,282	105,935

Machinery, equipment and software	834,970	752,722

Furniture and fixtures	29,157	27,432

Leasehold improvements	59,378	52,536

Construction in progress	2,537	6,276

	1,049,885	961,462

Less: accumulated depreciation	729,669	681,641

	$320,216	$279,821


Question: What would the change in the amount of Land from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was $17,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 439


Question: What would the percentage change in the amount of Land from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was $17,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 2.65


Question: What would be the total fair value of money market funds and long-term investments at December 31, 2019 if the fair value of money market funds is decreased by 10%?

Answer: 399767.9

Context:
Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company measures and reports certain cash equivalents, including money market funds and certificates of deposit, in addition to its long-term investments at fair value in accordance with the provisions of the authoritative accounting guidance that addresses fair value measurements. This guidance establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of the inputs as follows: Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities Level 2: Other inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are based on management’s assumptions, including fair value measurements determined by using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques The financial assets carried at fair value were determined using the following inputs (in thousands): The Company’s other financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other current liabilities, are carried at cost, which approximates fair-value due to the relatively short maturity of those instruments.

	Fair value at December 31, 2019	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Cash equivalents:

Money market funds	$297,311	$297,311	$ -	$ -

Noncurrent assets:

Long-term investments	132,188	-	-	132,188

	Fair value at December 31, 2018	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3

Cash equivalents:

Money market funds	$485,872	$485,872	$ -	$ -

Noncurrent assets:

Long-term investments	-	-	-	-


Question: What would be the total value of money market funds in 2018 and 2019 if the value of money market funds in 2018 is halved and then decreased by $5,000?

Answer: 540242


Question: What would be the percentage change in the company's money market funds between 2018 and 2019 if the 2019 value is increased by $500,000?

Answer: -38.71


Question: What would be the change in Total debt between 2018 and 2019 if total debt in 2018 was $200,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 94471

Context:
Note 3: Debt A summary of debt is as follows (amounts in thousands): (1) Amount shown is net of discount, bank issuance costs and other indirect issuance costs of $13.3 million as of March 31, 2018. (2) Amount shown is net of discount, bank issuance costs and other indirect issuance costs of $8.7 million as of March 31, 2019. (3) Amount shown is net of discount of $2.1 million as of March 31, 2019. (4) Amounts shown are net of discounts of $0.6 million and $0.5 million as of March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

	March 31,

	2019	2018

Term Loan Credit Agreement (1)	$—	$318,782

TOKIN Term Loan Facility (2)	276,808	—

Customer Advances (3)	11,270	—

Other, net (4)	6,393	5,841

Total debt	294,471	324,623

Current maturities	(28,430)	(20,540)

Total long-term debt	$266,041	$304,083


Question: What would be the change in current maturities between 2018 and 2019 if current maturities in 2019 were -$30,000 thousand instead?

Answer: -9460


Question: What would be the percentage change in total long-term debt between 2018 and 2019 if total long-term debt in 2019 was $400,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 31.54


Question: If Aa2/AA and above in 2019 was 3,000 million, what would be the change in the Aa2/AA and above from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 425

Context:
The credit quality and credit concentration of cash equivalents, current asset investments and derivative financial assets are detailed in the tables below. Where the opinion of Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) differ, the lower rating is used. a We hold cash collateral of £638m (2017/18: £492m, 2016/17: £702m) in respect of derivative financial assets with certain counterparties. The concentration of credit risk for our trading balances is provided in note 17, which analyses outstanding balances by customerfacing unit. Where multiple transactions are undertaken with a single financial counterparty or group of related counterparties, we enter into netting arrangements to reduce our exposure to credit risk by making use of standard International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) documentation. We have also entered into credit support agreements with certain swap counterparties whereby, on a daily, weekly and monthly basis, the fair value position on notional £3,289m of long dated cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps is collateralised. The related net cash inflow during the year was £129m (2017/18: outflow £220m, 2016/17: inflow £100m). The collateral paid and received is recognised within current asset investments and loans and other borrowings, respectively.

	2019	2018	2017

Moody’s / S&P credit rating of counterparty	£m	£m	£m

Aa2/AA and above	2,522	2,575	1,444

Aa3/AA–	1,376	313	208

A1/A+a	1,145	651	952

A2/Aa	649	628	370

A3/A–a	50	180	204

Baa1/BBB+a	75	59	561

Baa2/BBB and below a	160	207	86

	5,977	4,613	3,825


Question: If Aa3/AA– in 2019 was 1,000 million, what would be the average Aa3/AA– for 2017-2019?

Answer: 507


Question: If A1/A+a in 2019 was 600 million, in which year(s) would A1/A+a be under 1,000 million?

Answer: 2019

Answer: 2018

Answer: 2017


Question: If the customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists, at cost is now $650million, what is the difference in customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists, at cost from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 116.9

Context:
Other Intangible Assets, Net Other intangible assets include developed technologies, customer relationships, trade names, patents, user lists and the related accumulated amortization. These assets are shown as “Developed technologies, net” and as part of “Other assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The majority of Autodesk’s other intangible assets are amortized to expense over the estimated economic life of the product, which ranges from two to ten years. Amortization expense for developed technologies, customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists was $33.5 million in fiscal 2019, $36.6 million in fiscal 2018 and $72.2 million in fiscal 2017. Other intangible assets and related accumulated amortization at January 31 were as follows: (1) Included in “Other assets” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. (2) Includes the effects of foreign currency translation.

	2019	2018

Developed technologies, at cost	$670.2	$578.5

Customer relationships, trade names, patents, and user lists, at cost (1)	533.1	372.5

Other intangible assets, at cost (2)	1,203.3	951.0

Less: accumulated amortization	(922.5)	(895.8)

Other intangible assets, net	$280.8	$55.2


Question: How much did developed technologies, at cost gain in 2019 over 2018 if it was 600 million in 2019?

Answer: 3.72


Question: If the net other tangible assets for 2019 is now $160 million, what is the increase in net other tangible assets from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 104.8


Question: In which year would the carrying value for trade, other receivables and contract assets be larger if the amount in 2019 was 265.4 million instead?

Answer: 2019

Context:
Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities Fair values of financial assets and liabilities at 31st December 2019 are not materially different from book values due to their size or the fact that they were at short-term rates of interest. Fair values have been assessed as follows: • Derivatives Forward exchange contracts are marked to market by discounting the future contracted cash flows using readily available market data • Interest-bearing loans and borrowings Fair value is calculated based on discounted expected future principal and interest cash flows. • Lease liabilities The fair value is estimated as the present value of future cash flows, discounted at the incremental borrowing rate for the related geographical location unless the rate implicit in the lease is readily determinable. • Trade and other receivables/payables For receivables/payables with a remaining life of less than one year, the notional amount is deemed to reflect the fair value. The following table compares amounts and fair values of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities: There are no other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis for which fair value is disclosed. Derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value. Fair value of derivative financial instruments are calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis using appropriate market information for the duration of the instruments.

	2019 Fair value	2019 Carrying value	2018 Carrying value	2018 Fair value

	£m	£m	£m	£m

Financial assets:

Cash and cash equivalents	168.5	168.5	187.1	187.1

Trade, other receivables and contract assets	263.4	263.4	264.9	264.9

Total financial assets	431.9	431.9	452.0	452.0


Question: What would the change in the carrying value in total financial assets from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 430.0 million instead?

Answer: -22


Question: What would the percentage change in the carrying value in total financial assets from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 430.0 million instead?

Answer: -4.87


Question: What would be the difference in the EBITDA between Software Solutions and Data and Analytics if EBITDA for Data and Analytics were $500 million instead?

Answer: 67.2

Context:
Summarized financial information concerning our segments is shown in the tables below (in millions): (1) Revenues for Corporate and Other represent deferred revenue purchase accounting adjustments recorded in accordance with GAAP. (2) Operating expenses for Corporate and Other includes equity-based compensation, including certain related payroll taxes, of $51.7 million, $51.4 million and $19.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. (4) Depreciation and amortization for Corporate and Other primarily represents net incremental depreciation and amortization adjustments associated with the application of purchase accounting recorded in accordance with GAAP. (5) Transition and integration costs primarily consists of costs associated with executive transition, transition-related costs as we transferred certain corporate functions from FNF and acquisitions. (6) Receivables from related parties are included in Corporate and Other.

			Year ended December 31, 2018

	Software Solutions	Data and Analytics	Corporate and Other		Total

Revenues	$962.0	$154.5	$(2.5)	(1)	$1,114.0

Expenses:

Operating expenses	394.8	115.0	115.6	(2)	625.4

Transition and integration costs	—	—	6.6	(5)	6.6

EBITDA	567.2	39.5	(124.7)		482.0

Depreciation and amortization	112.9	14.1	90.0	(4)	217.0

Operating income (loss)	454.3	25.4	(214.7)		265.0

Interest expense, net					(51.7)

Other expense, net					(7.1)

Earnings before income taxes					206.2

Income tax expense					37.7

Net earnings					$168.5

Balance sheet data:

Total assets	$3,227.8	$310.2	$115.4	(6)	$3,653.4

Goodwill	$2,157.6	$172.1	$—		$2,329.7


Question: What would be the difference between Total Assets and Total Goodwill if Total Goodwill was $3,000 million instead?

Answer: 653.4


Question: What would be the difference in Depreciation and amortization between Software Solutions and Corporate and Other if the amount for Corporate and Other was $100 million instead?

Answer: 12.9


Question: In which year would the pension costs be the largest if the amount in 2018 was $3.6 million instead?

Answer: 2018

Context:
NOTE 3 – STAFF COSTS Employee information The majority of the staff on vessels are not employed by TORM. Staff costs included in operating expenses relate to the 108 seafarers (2018: 112, 2017: 131). The average number of employees is calculated as a full-time equivalent (FTE). The Executive Director is, in the event of termination by the Company, entitled to a severance payment of up to 12 months' salary.

USDm	2019	2018	2017

Total staff costs

Staff costs included in operating expenses	8.1	9.3	9.2

Staff costs included in administrative expenses	37.7	36.9	34.6

Total	45.8	46.2	43.8

Staff costs comprise the following

Wages and salaries	37.2	38.1	36.4

Share-based compensation	1.9	2.1	1.9

Pension costs	3.5	3.3	3.1

Other social security costs	0.9	0.6	0.3

Other staff costs	2.3	2.1	2.1

Total	45.8	46.2	43.8

Average number of permanent employees

Seafarers	107.6	111.7	130.6

Land-based	313.5	302.2	286.6

Total	421.1	413.9	417.2


Question: What would the change in the total average number of permanent employees from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 420.0 instead?

Answer: 6.1


Question: What would the percentage change in the total average number of permanent employees from 2018 to 2019 be if the amount in 2019 was 420.0 instead?

Answer: 1.47


Question: How many years would the amount of general and administrative exceed $5,000 thousand if the amount of general and administrative in 2018 was $6,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 2

Context:
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future. The selected financial data should be read together with Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The following tables set forth our selected consolidated financial and other data for the years ended and as of December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands, except share and per share data). Information about prior period acquisitions that may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below is included in Item 1. Business. Information about the $28.0 million expense recorded in general and administrative expense in 2018, which relates to the agreement reached to settle the legal matter alleging violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 3. “Legal Proceedings.” Information about the $1.7 million of interest recorded within interest income and the $6.9 million of gain recorded within other income, net, in 2019, which relates to promissory note proceeds received from one of our hardware suppliers and proceeds from an acquired promissory note, and may affect the comparability of the selected financial information presented below, is disclosed in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." Certain previously reported amounts in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been reclassified to conform to our current presentation to reflect interest income as a separate line item, which was previously included in other income, net.

			Year Ended December 31,

	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015

Stock-based compensation expense data:

Sales and marketing	$2,075	$1,196	$561	$536	$372

General and administrative	6,474	4,901	2,638	1,430	2,486

Research and development	12,054	7,332	4,214	2,035	1,266

Total stock-based compensation expense	$20,603	$13,429	$7,413	$4,001	$4,124


Question: What would be the change in the amount of research and development between 2018 and 2019 if the amount of research and development in 2018 was $10,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 2054


Question: What would be the percentage change in the Total stock-based compensation expense between 2018 and 2019 if the Total stock-based compensation expense in 2019 was $15,000 thousand instead?

Answer: 11.7


Question: As of March 31, 2017, what would be the difference between the value of foreign currency translation adjustments and the unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities if the value of the former increased by $3 million?

Answer: 5

Context:
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) Components and activities of AOCI, net of tax, were as follows: During fiscal 2018, a net foreign currency translation loss of $8 million related to foreign entities sold in the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions was reclassified to Gain on divestiture, and a net gain of $3 million related to liquidated foreign entities was reclassified to Other income (expense), net. A realized gain of $7 million on securities sold in connection with the divestiture of our WSS and PKI solutions was reclassified to Gain on divestiture. The tax effect of $3 million was reclassified to Income tax expense (benefit).

(In millions)	Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments	Unrealized Gain (Loss) On Available- For-Sale Securities	Equity Method Investee	Total AOCI

Balance as of March 31, 2017	$7	$5	$—	$12

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(4)	(5)	—	(9)

Reclassification to net income (loss)	5	(4)	—	1

Balance as of March 30, 2018	8	(4)	—	4

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(13)	3	(1)	(11)

Balance as of March 29, 2019	$(5)	$(1)	$(1)	$(7)


Question: If balance as of end of fiscal year 2019 was $(10) million for Total AOCI instead, What would be the average balance as of the end of fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 for Total AOCI?

Answer: 2


Question: If  Balance as of March 29, 2019 for total AOCI was $(13) million, What would be the Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications expressed as a percentage of  Balance as of March 29, 2019 for total AOCI?

Answer: 84.62


Question: In which year would the revenues from fixed rate time charters be the highest if the revenue in 2017 was 578,320 thousand?

Answer: 2017

Context:
GasLog Ltd. and its Subsidiaries Notes to the consolidated financial statements (Continued) For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019 (All amounts expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except share and per share data) 18. Revenues from Contracts with Customers The Group has recognized the following amounts relating to revenues: Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited relate only to the pool revenues received from GasLog’s vessels operating in the Cool Pool and do not include the Net pool allocation to GasLog of ($4,264) for the year ended December 31, 2019 ($17,818 for the year ended December 31, 2018 and $7,254 for the year ended December 31, 2017), which is recorded as a separate line item in the Profit or Loss Statement. Following the exit from the Cool Pool, management allocates revenues from time charters to two categories: (a) variable rate charters and (b) fixed rate charters. The variable rate charter category contains vessels operating in the LNG carrier spot and short-term market or those which have a variable rate of hire across the charter period.

		For the year ended December 31,

	2017	2018	2019

Revenues from fixed rate time charters	485,961	515,324	558,266

Revenues from variable rate time charters	—	—	64,334

Revenues from The Cool Pool Limited (GasLog vessels)	38,046	102,253	45,253

Revenues from vessel management services	1,222	767	784

Total	525,229	618,344	668,637


Question: What would be the change in revenues from The Cool Pool Limited  from 2017 to 2018 if the revenue in 2017 was 90,652 thousand?

Answer: 11601


Question: What would be the percentage change in total revenue from 2018 to 2019 if the revenue was 624,741 thousand in 2019?

Answer: 1.03


Question: If outstanding in 2018 was 300 thousands, what would be the change from 2018 to 2019?

Answer: 145

Context:
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units Performance-based restricted stock units are eligible to vest at the end of each fiscal year in a three-year performance period based on the Company’s annual growth rate in net sales and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share (subject to certain adjustments) over a multiple of four times the related results for the fourth quarter of 2018 relative to the growth rates for a peer group of companies for the same metrics and periods. For the performance-based restricted stock units granted in 2019, 60% of each performance-based award is subject to the net sales metric for the performance period and 40% is subject to the non-GAAP diluted earnings per share metric for the performance period. The maximum percentage for a particular metric is2 50% of the target number of units subject to the award related to that metric, however, vesting of the performance stock units is capped at 30% and 100%, respectively, of the target number of units subject to the award in years one and two, respectively, of the three-year performance period. As of December 31, 2019, the Company believes that it is probable that the Company will achieve performance metrics specified in the award agreement based on its expected revenue and non-GAAP diluted EPS results over the performance period and calculated growth rates relative to its peers’ expected results based on data available, as defined in the award agreement. A summary of the Company’s performance-based restricted stock unit activity is as follows: (1) Number of shares granted is based on the maximum percentage achievable in the performance-based restricted stock unit award.

	Number of Shares	Weighted-Average Grant-Date

	(in thousands)	Fair Value per Share

Outstanding at December 31, 2018	—	$—

Granted(1)	445	22.21

Outstanding at December 31, 2019	445	22.21


Question: If granted was 250 thousands, what percentage of outstanding in 2019 was granted shares if the outstanding in 2019 still remains the same?

Answer: 56.18


Question: If outstanding shares in 2019 was 150 thousands, in which year would it be less than 200 thousands?

Answer: 2018

Answer: 2019


Question: What would the percentage change in carrying values for CRTC deferral account obligation in 2019 be if the carrying value for 2019 is 88?

Answer: -18.52

Context:
FAIR VALUE Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Certain fair value estimates are affected by assumptions we make about the amount and timing of future cash flows and discount rates, all of which reflect varying degrees of risk. Income taxes and other expenses that would be incurred on disposition of financial instruments are not reflected in the fair values. As a result, the fair values are not the net amounts that would be realized if these instruments were settled. The carrying values of our cash and cash equivalents, trade and other receivables, dividends payable, trade payables and accruals, compensation payable, severance and other costs payable, interest payable, notes payable and loans secured by trade receivables approximate fair value as they are short-term. The following table provides the fair value details of financial instruments measured at amortized cost in the statements of financial position. (1) Upon adoption of IFRS 16 on January 1, 2019, fair value disclosures are no longer required for leases

			DECEMBER 31, 2019		DECEMBER 31, 2018

	CLASSIFICATION	FAIR VALUE METHODOLOGY	CARRYING VALUE	FAIR VALUE	CARRYING VALUE	FAIR VALUE

CRTC tangible benefits obligation	Trade payables and other liabilities and other non-current liabilities	Present value of estimated future cash flows discounted using observable market interest rates	29	29	61	61

CRTC deferral account obligation	Trade payables and other liabilities and other non-current liabilities	Present value of estimated future cash flows discounted using observable market interest rates	82	85	108	112

Debt securities and other debt	Debt due within one year and long-term debt	Quoted market price of debt	18,653	20,905	18,188	19,178

Finance leases (1)	Debt due within one year and long-term debt	Present value of future cash flows discounted using observable market interest rates	-	-	2,097	2,304


Question: What would the percentage change in fair values for CRTC tangible benefits obligation in 2019 be if the fair value in 2019 is 31?

Answer: -49.18


Question: What would the sum of carrying values in 2019 be if the value for CRTC tangible benefits obligation is 35 ?

Answer: 18770


Question: What would be the average difference between number of rights in opening and closing balance for both years if closing balance for FY18 was 2,500,000?

Answer: 719897.5

Context:
21 Share-based payments (a) Performance rights The performance rights plan was established by the Board of Directors to provide long-term incentives to the Group’s Senior Executives based on total shareholder returns (TSR) taking into account the Group’s financial and operational performance. Under the Plan, eligible participants may be granted performance rights on terms and conditions determined by the Board from time to time. Performance rights were granted during the course of FY17, FY18 and FY19. The vesting conditions for grants relate to TSR exceeding the ASX 200 Accumulation Index over the measurement period. Vesting of the rights will be tested on or around the day following the release of each of the annual results for the years ended 30 June 2019, 2020 and 2021 respectively. Performance rights are granted by the Company for nil consideration. The Board has discretion to determine if the value will be provided in shares, cash or a combination of shares and cash. Rights granted under the plan carry no dividend or voting rights. The fair value of the rights at the date of valuation was determined using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model to be equal to the volume weighted-average price (VWAP) ending on the day before the grant date, less the dividends expected over the period from the expected grant date to the completion of the measurement period, adjusted for the expected probability of achieving the vesting conditions.

	30 June 2019	30 June 2019	30 June 2018	30 June 2018

	Number of Rights	Average Fair Value	Number of Rights	Average Fair Value

Opening balance	2,948,960	$1.87	3,460,195	$1.26

Granted during the year	828,285	$3.07	762,577	$3.32

Vested during the year	(1,307,885)	$1.19	(1,273,812)	$1.09

Forfeited during the year	-	$0.00	-	$0.00

Closing balance	2,469,360	$2.64	2,948,960	$1.87


Question: Which year had more rights vested if number of rights vested during 2018 was 1,500,000?

Answer: 2018


Question: What would be the percentage change in average fair value at closing balance between 2018 and 2019 if average fair price in 2018 was $1.50?

Answer: 76


Question: If revenue in 2019 was 3,000 million, what was the increase / (decrease)?

Answer: 853

Context:
2.4 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS AND PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS The following key performance indicators are closely monitored to ensure that business strategies and objectives are closely aligned with shareholder value creation. The key performance indicators are not measurements in accordance with IFRS and should not be considered an alternative to other measures of performance in accordance with IFRS. The Corporation's method of calculating key performance indicators may differ from other companies and, accordingly, these key performance indicators may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. The Corporation measures its performance, with regard to these objectives by monitoring revenue, adjusted EBITDA(1), free cash flow(1) and capital intensity(1) on a constant currency basis(1). (1) Fiscal 2018 was restated to comply with IFRS 15 and to reflect a change in accounting policy as well as to reclassify results from Cogeco Peer 1 as discontinued operations. For further details, please consult the "Accounting policies" and "Discontinued operations" sections. (2) Following the announcement of the agreement on February 27, 2019 to sell Cogeco Peer 1, fiscal 2019 financial guidelines were revised. (3) Actual results are presented in constant currency based on fiscal 2018 average foreign exchange rates of 1.2773 USD/CDN. For further details on the Corporation's operating results, please refer to the "Operating and financial results", the "Segmented operating and financial results" and the "Cash flow analysis" sections.

(in millions of dollars, except percentages)	Actual Fiscal 2018 (1) $	Revised projections (2) Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3)	Actual Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3) $	Actual Fiscal 2019 (constant currency) (3) %	Achievement of the projections Fiscal 2019

Financial guidelines

Revenue	2,147	Increase of 6% to 8%	2,294	6.8	Achieved

Adjusted EBITDA	1,007	Increase of 8% to 10%	1,092	8.5	Achieved

Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment	458	$450 to $470	425	(7.1)	Surpassed

Capital intensity	21.3%	20% to 21%	18.5%	-	Surpassed

Free cash flow	302	Increase of 38% to 45%	453	50.0	Surpassed


Question: If Adjusted EBITDA in 2019 was 1,500 million, what was the average?

Answer: 1253.5


Question: If free cash flow in 2019 was 600 million, what was the increase / (decrease)?

Answer: 298


Question: What was the change in Purchases of common stock between 2018 and 2019 if Purchases of common stock in 2019 was -$300 million instead?

Answer: -67.2

Context:
Cash Flows from Financing Activities Our significant financing activities were as follows (in millions): (1) 2017 contributions primarily relate to the funding of the FPS Acquisition. (2) In the fourth quarter of 2018, two of our minority holders in India delivered notice of exercise of their put options with respect to certain shares in our Indian subsidiary, ATC TIPL. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we completed the redemption of the put shares for total consideration of INR 29.4 billion ($425.7 million at the date of redemption). Senior Notes Repayments of Senior Notes Repayment of 3.40% Senior Notes—On the February 15, 2019 maturity date, we repaid $1.0 billion aggregate principal amount of the 3.40% Notes. The 3.40% Notes were repaid with borrowings from the 2019 Multicurrency Credit Facility and the 2019 Credit Facility. Upon completion of the repayment, none of the 3.40% Notes remained outstanding. Repayment of 5.050% Senior Notes—On April 22, 2019, we redeemed all of the $700.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 5.050% Notes at a price equal to 103.0050% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding April 22, 2019, for an aggregate redemption price of $726.0 million, including $5.0 million in accrued and unpaid interest. We recorded a loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $22.1 million, which includes prepayment consideration of $21.0 million and the associated unamortized discount and deferred financing costs. The redemption was funded with borrowings from the 2019 Credit Facility and cash on hand. Upon completion of the repayment, none of the 5.050% Notes remained outstanding. Repayment of 5.900% Senior Notes—On January 15, 2020, we redeemed all of the $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.900% senior unsecured notes due 2021 (the “5.900% Notes”) at a price equal to 106.7090% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to, but excluding January 15, 2020, for an aggregate redemption price of $539.6 million, including $6.1 million in accrued and unpaid interest. We recorded a loss on retirement of long-term obligations of $34.6 million, which includes prepayment consideration of $33.5 million and the associated unamortized discount and deferred financing costs. The redemption was funded with borrowings from the 2019 Credit Facility and cash on hand. Upon completion of the repayment, none of the 5.900% Notes remained outstanding.

		Year Ended December 31,

	2019	2018	2017

Proceeds from issuance of senior notes, net	$4,876.7	$584.9	$2,674.0

Proceeds from (repayments of) credit facilities, net	425.0	(695.9)	628.6

Distributions paid on common and preferred stock	(1,603.0)	(1,342.4)	(1,164.4)

Purchases of common stock	(19.6)	(232.8)	(766.3)

Repayments of securitized debt	—	(500.0)	(302.5)

(Distributions to) contributions from noncontrolling interest holders, net (1)	(11.8)	(14.4)	264.3

Repayments of senior notes	(1,700.0)	—	(1,300.0)

(Repayments of) proceeds from term loan, net	(500.0)	1,500.0	—

Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interest (2)	(425.7)	—	—

Proceeds from issuance of securities in securitization transaction	—	500.0


Question: What was the change in net (Distributions to) contributions from noncontrolling interest holders between 2017 and 2018 if net (Distributions to) contributions from noncontrolling interest holders in 2018 was $100 million instead?

Answer: -164.3


Question: What was the percentage change in the net Proceeds from issuance of senior notes between 2018 and 2019 if net Proceeds from issuance of senior notes in 2019 was $1,000 million instead?

Answer: 70.97


Question: What would be the change in the Vesting of restricted stock between 2018 and 2019 if the vesting of restricted stock in 2019 was 3,000,000 instead?

Answer: 272771

Context:
Common Stock Outstanding The following represents the common stock outstanding for the fiscal year ended: (1) During fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of $350.0 million, $450.0 million and $400.0 million, respectively, of the Company’s common stock under share repurchase programs, which were repurchased during fiscal years 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

		Fiscal Year Ended August 31,

	2019	2018	2017

Common stock outstanding:

Beginning balances	164,588,172	177,727,653	186,998,472

Shares issued upon exercise of stock options	11,348	30,832	172,620

Shares issued under employee stock purchase plan	1,282,042	1,105,400	1,228,316

Vesting of restricted stock	1,983,261	2,727,229	2,102,049

Purchases of treasury stock under employee stock plans	(489,836)	(793,052)	(550,096)

Treasury shares purchased(1)	(13,854,607)	(16,209,890)	(12,223,708)

Ending balances	153,520,380	164,588,172	177,727,653


Question: How many years would the Shares issued upon exercise of stock options exceed 100,000 if the shares issued upon exercise of stock options in 2018 was 110,000 instead?

Answer: 2


Question: What would be the percentage change in the ending balance between 2018 and 2019 if the ending balance in 2019 was 200,000,000 instead?

Answer: 21.52


Question: What was the change in the net cash provided by (used for) by operating activities between 2018 and 2019 if net cash provided by (used for) operating activities in 2019 was $5,000 million instead?

Answer: 1251.7

Context:
Summary cash flow information is set forth below for the years ended December 31, (in millions): We use our cash flows to fund our operations and investments in our business, including tower maintenance and improvements, communications site construction and managed network installations and tower and land acquisitions. Additionally, we use our cash flows to make distributions, including distributions of our REIT taxable income to maintain our qualification for taxation as a REIT under the Code. We may also repay or repurchase our existing indebtedness or equity from time to time. We typically fund our international expansion efforts primarily through a combination of cash on hand, intercompany debt and equity contributions. In April 2019, Tata Teleservices and Tata Sons Limited, two of our minority holders in India, delivered notice of exercise of their put options with respect to their remaining combined holdings in our Indian subsidiary, ATC TIPL (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report). Accordingly, we expect to pay an amount equivalent to INR 24.8 billion (approximately $347.6 million at the December 31, 2019 exchange rate) to redeem the put shares in the first half of 2020, subject to regulatory approval. In connection with the closing of the Eaton Towers Acquisition, In April 2019, Tata Teleservices and Tata Sons Limited, two of our minority holders in India, delivered notice of exercise of their put options with respect to their remaining combined holdings in our Indian subsidiary, ATC TIPL (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report). Accordingly, we expect to pay an amount equivalent to INR 24.8 billion (approximately $347.6 million at the December 31, 2019 exchange rate) to redeem the put shares in the first half of 2020, subject to regulatory approval. In connection with the closing of the Eaton Towers Acquisition, In April 2019, Tata Teleservices and Tata Sons Limited, two of our minority holders in India, delivered notice of exercise of their put options with respect to their remaining combined holdings in our Indian subsidiary, ATC TIPL (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report). Accordingly, we expect to pay an amount equivalent to INR 24.8 billion (approximately $347.6 million at the December 31, 2019 exchange rate) to redeem the put shares in the first half of 2020, subject to regulatory approval. In connection with the closing of the Eaton Towers Acquisition, we entered into an agreement with MTN to acquire MTN’s noncontrolling interests in each of our joint ventures in Ghana and Uganda for total consideration of approximately $523.0 million. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2020, subject to regulatory approval and other closing conditions. In April 2019, Tata Teleservices and Tata Sons Limited, two of our minority holders in India, delivered notice of exercise of their put options with respect to their remaining combined holdings in our Indian subsidiary, ATC TIPL (see note 15 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report). Accordingly, we expect to pay an amount equivalent to INR 24.8 billion (approximately $347.6 million at the December 31, 2019 exchange rate) to redeem the put shares in the first half of 2020, subject to regulatory approval. In connection with the closing of the Eaton Towers Acquisition As of December 31, 2019, we had total outstanding indebtedness of $24.2 billion, with a current portion of $2.9 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we generated sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our capital expenditures and debt service obligations, as well as our required distributions. We believe the cash generated by operating activities during the year ending December 31, 2020, together with our borrowing capacity under our credit facilities and cash on hand, will be sufficient to fund our required distributions, capital expenditures, debt service obligations (interest and principal repayments) and signed acquisitions. As of December 31, 2019, we had $1.3 billion of cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries, of which $583.0 million was held by our joint ventures. While certain subsidiaries may pay us interest or principal on intercompany debt, it has not been our practice to repatriate earnings from our foreign subsidiaries primarily due to our ongoing expansion efforts and related capital needs. However, in the event that we do repatriate any funds, we may be required to accrue and pay certain taxes.

	2019	2018	2017

Net cash provided by (used for):

Operating activities	$3,752.6	$3,748.3	$2,925.6

Investing activities	(3,987.5)	(2,749.5)	(2,800.9)

Financing activities	521.7	(607.7)	(113.0)

Net effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash	(13.7)	(41.1)	6.7

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash	$273.1	$350.0	$18.4


Question: What was the change in the net cash provided by (used for) by investing activities between 2017 and 2018 if the net cash provided by (used for) investing activities in 2018 was -$3,000 million instead?

Answer: -199.1


Question: What is the percentage change in the net cash provided by (used for) financing activities between 2017 and 2018 if the net cash provided by (used for) financing activities in 2018 was -$900 million instead?

Answer: 696.46


Question: What would the average net cash provided by operating activities from 2017-2019 be if net cash provided by operating activities was $200,000 in 2019 instead?

Answer: 119254.33

Context:
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities and Free Cash Flow The following table presents a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow (in thousands, except for percentages): Net cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was $115.5 million as compared to $90.3 million during the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to improved profitability, improved collections, and other working capital changes in 2019 when compared to the same period in 2018. Free cash flow for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 was $72.8 million, resulting in a free cash flow margin of 12.6%, as compared to free cash flow of $49.8 million and a free cash flow margin of 9.3% for the same period in 2018. The increase was primarily due to both improved profitability and collections, and is partially offset by cash paid for interest on our convertible notes of $17.4 million in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019. Refer to the section titled “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for additional information on the convertible notes.

		Year Ended December 31,

	2019	2018	2017

Reconciliation of free cash flow:

Net cash provided by operating activities	$115,549	$90,253	$67,510

Capital expenditures	(18,034)	(14,895)	(7,100)

Capitalized software costs	(24,668)	(25,515)	(20,571)

Free cash flow	$72,847	$49,843	$39,839

Free cash flow margin	12.6%	9.3%	8.3%


Question: What would the change in free flow cash margin between 2017 and 2018 be if free flow cash margin was 10.0% in 2018 instead?

Answer: 1.7


Question: What would the change in free cash flow between 2018 and 2019 be if free cash flow was $60,000 in 2018 instead?

Answer: 12847