AbstractTranscatheter mitral valve repair (TMVR) using MitraClip (MC) is now an established technique in the interventional treatment of mitral regurgitation. Common complications after MC procedure are bleeding and ischemic events. However, 2017 ESC/EACTS and 2020 ACC/AHA did not give a clear antithrombotic protocol, the policy has been based on clinical experience. Here, we performed a meta‐analysis comparing outcomes with and without the addition of anticoagulants after TMVR. We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to October 6, 2022 to identify studies with or without the use of anticoagulants after TMVR. From each study, we extracted the number of people with bleeding, stroke, combined endpoints, and all‐cause death. Five observational cohort studies were included, enrolling a total of 1892 patients undergoing TMVR who were assigned to either the anticoagulation group (n= 1209) or the no‐anticoagulation group (n= 683). Pooled analysis showed a significantly lower stroke rate in the anticoagulated group (at least 4 weeks duration) compared with the non‐anticoagulated group (RR [95% CI] = 0.14 [0.0−0.77],p= 0.02), and similar rates of bleeding, combined endpoints, and all‐cause death in both groups (RR [95% CI] = 0.76 [0.48−1.22],p= 0.26), (RR [95% CI] = 0.52 [0.10−2.63],p= 0.43), and (RR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.58−1.35],p= 0.58). We observed a reduced risk of stroke without elevated risk of bleeding, combined endpoints, or all‐cause death in patients using anticoagulants (at least 4 weeks duration) after TMVR compared to no anticoagulants.