AbstractBackgroundAltitude sojourns increasingly attract individuals of all ages and different health statuses due to the appeal of high-altitude destinations worldwide and easy access to air travel. The risk of acute mountain sickness (AMS) when flying to high-altitude destinations remains underemphasized. Thus, this review aims to evaluate the altitude-dependent AMS incidence depending on the mode of ascending, e.g. by air vs terrestrial travel.MethodsA literature search was performed to identify the observational studies assessing AMS incidence after acute ascent of primarily healthy adults to real high altitude. In addition, placebo arms of interventional trials evaluating the prophylactic efficacy of various drugs have been separately analysed to confirm or refute the findings from the observational studies. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the altitude-dependent AMS incidence.ResultsFindings of 12 observational studies, in which the AMS incidence in 11 021 individuals ascending to 19 different altitudes (2200–4559 m) was evaluated, revealed an impressive 4.5-fold steeper increase in the AMS incidence for air travel as compared with slower ascent modes, i.e. hiking or combined car and/or air travel and hiking. The higher AMS incidence following transportation by flight vs slower means was also confirmed in placebo-treated participants in 10 studies of drug prophylaxis against AMS.ConclusionsDue to the short time span in going from low to high altitude, reduced acclimatization likely is the main reason for a higher AMS risk when travelling to high-altitude destinations by flight. To avoid frustrating travel experiences and health risks, appropriate and timely medical advice on how to prepare for air travel to high altitude is of vital importance. Effective preparation options include the use of modern pre-acclimatization strategies and pharmacological prophylaxis by acetazolamide or dexamethasone, or even considering alternate itineraries with more gradual ascent.