BackgroundTranstendon repair and repair after completion of the tear have been widely used to treat partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PT-RCTs). The present study was aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and tendon integrity following arthroscopic repair of articular PT-RCTs using transtendon repair or repair after completion of the tear.MethodsWe performed a systematic electronic database search on Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed and Embase to identify articles equating articular-sided PT-RCTs repair. The randomized controlled clinical trials that met our criteria were evaluated for quality of methodology. The results obtained were further analyzed and correlated to present the benefits and drawbacks comparing the two surgical procedures.ResultAccording to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, six articles were included in the present study. A total of 501 patients were analyzed as part of this study. The results indicated that both the surgical treatments provided excellent functional improvements and tendon integrity. However, no significant differences for the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, constant score, range of motion, postoperative adhesive capsulitis, tendon integrity and patient satisfaction were found between the two cohorts (p> 0.05).ConclusionsBoth transtendon technique and repair after completion of the tear for articular-sided partial rotator cuff tear provide improvements in clinical outcome with a low complication rate and a high rate of healing.