BackgroundsA significant contributor to newborn morbidity and mortality is preterm birth. Several techniques have been employed to identify patients at risk of premature labour. However, these predictors are not always effective because of their multifactorial aetiology. Preterm labour can be suppressed largely through tocolysis. This study compared the effectiveness and safety of transdermal nitroglycerine and oral nifedipine in preventing premature labour.MethodsThis study was done at Acharya Vinoba Bhave Rural Hospital, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, from December 2020 to November 2022, on 130 women presenting with preterm labour pains between 28 and 37 weeks of gestational age. All the women selected were randomized into two equal groups by using the envelope method. Sixty-five women were given a nitroglycerine patch (Group A), and the rest (65 women) were given an oral nifedipine tablet (group B). The variables studied were mean days of prolongation of pregnancy, treatment outcome, steroid coverage, along with feto-maternal outcomes among both groups.ResultsThe percentage of women whose pregnancy was prolonged for at least 48 hours in the nitroglycerine group was 75.3%, and in the nifedipine group it was 93.8%. Failure to achieve tocolysis, defined as delivery within 48 hours, was seen significantly more in the nitroglycerine group (24.6%) than in the nifedipine group (6.1%). The overall foetal outcomes were comparable in both groups.ConclusionOral nifedipine was found to be superior to transdermal nifedipine patches in terms of efficacy and safety in the management of preterm labour, with a better side effect profile.