Background and PurposeProton therapy is sensitive to range uncertainties, which typically are accounted for by margins or robust optimization, based on tissue-independent uncertainties. However, range uncertainties have been shown to depend on the specific tissues traversed. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences between range margins based on stopping power ratio (SPR) uncertainties which were tissue-specific (applied voxel-wise) or fixed (tissue-independent or composite).Materials and MethodsUncertainties originating from imaging, computed tomography (CT) number estimation, and SPR estimation were calculated for low-, medium-, and high-density tissues to quantify the tissue-specific SPR uncertainties. Four clinical treatment plans (four different tumor sites) were created and recomputed after applying either tissue-specific or fixed SPR uncertainties. Plans with tissue-specific and fixed uncertainties were compared, based on dose-volume-histogram parameters for both targets and organs-at-risk.ResultsThe total SPR uncertainties were 7.0% for low-, 1.0% for medium-, and 1.3% for high-density tissues. Differences between the proton plans with tissue-specific and fixed uncertainties were mainly found in the vicinity of the target. Composite uncertainties were found to capture the tissue-specific uncertainties more accurately than the tissue-independent uncertainties.ConclusionDifferent SPR uncertainties were found for low-, medium-, and high-density tissues indicating that range margins based on tissue-specific uncertainties may be more exact than the standard approach of using tissue-independent uncertainties. Differences between applying tissue-specific and fixed uncertainties were found, however, a fixed uncertainty might still be sufficient, but with a magnitude that depends on the body region.