BackgroundIn this study, we aimed to determine if there is a difference in the rates of wound dehiscence, delayed union, nonunion, and unanticipated surgery after the use of bioabsorbable local antibiotic-delivery systems (LADS), specifically comparing antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate pellets (Osteoset-T, Wright Medical Technology Inc., Arlington, TN, USA, hereafter referred to as beads) and chitosan sponge (Sentrex BioSponge, Bionova Medical, Germantown, TN, USA, hereafter referred to as sponges) in the management of acute and chronic extremity wounds.MethodologyWe conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study in the setting of a level 1 trauma center. All patients who received either beads or sponges as an adjunct to surgical debridement from January 2010 to December 2017 were included, and 136 patients met the inclusion criteria. The intervention studied was extremity wounds that were treated with bioabsorbable LADS, either beads or sponges. The main outcome measurement was wound dehiscence and the need for unanticipated surgery.ResultsOf the 136 patients in the study cohort, 78% (106/136) were treated with beads, and 22% (30/136) were treated with sponges. Of the 136 patients, 50 (37%) experienced wound dehiscence, and 49 patients required unanticipated surgery. Overall, 62% (31/50) of patients with wound dehiscence and 67.4% (33/49) of patients requiring unanticipated surgery were seen in the bead cohort (p = 0.0001 and 0.025, respectively). However, in multivariable analyses, we found that the odds of having wound dehiscence and undergoing unanticipated surgery were, respectively, 4.9 (p = 0.001) and 2.8 (p = 0.021) times more likely to occur in the sponge than in the bead group.ConclusionsSentrex sponges appear to be associated with higher rates of wound dehiscence and the need for unanticipated surgery compared to Osteoset beads.