AbstractWhole-genome sequencing is the most comprehensive form of next-generation sequencing method. We aimed to assess the additional diagnostic yield of whole-genome sequencing in patients with clinically diagnosed Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease when compared with whole-exome sequencing, which has not been reported in the literature. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on 72 families whose genetic cause of clinically diagnosed Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease was not revealed after the whole-exome sequencing and 17p12 duplication screening. Among the included families, 14 (19.4%) acquired genetic diagnoses that were compatible with their phenotypes. The most common factor that led to the additional diagnosis in the whole-genome sequencing was genotype-driven analysis (four families, 4/14), in which a wider range of genes, not limited to peripheral neuropathy-related genes, were analysed. Another four families acquired diagnosis due to the inherent advantage of whole-genome sequencing such as better coverage than the whole-exome sequencing (two families, 2/14), structural variants (one family, 1/14) and non-coding variants (one family, 1/14). In conclusion, an evident gain in diagnostic yield was obtained from whole-genome sequencing of the whole-exome sequencing-negative cases. A wide range of genes, not limited to inherited peripheral neuropathy-related genes, should be targeted during whole-genome sequencing.