Simple SummaryBrachiation is a form of suspensory (i.e., meaning the animal hangs below branches) locomotion in which only the forelimbs are used for weight support and propulsion. Brachiation has only ever evolved in Primates, and the living hominoids (i.e., apes) are considered specialized brachiating species. Odd among the apes are humans who have all but abandoned brachiation in favor of striding bipedalism. However, humans still retain the ability to adopt brachiation as a form of locomotion. As such, we explored the center of mass mechanics of human brachiation to explore how similar these movements matched the expectations of a simple pendulum. These findings were compared to data collected from non-human primates. Generally, humans demonstrated shorter than expected pendulum periods and remarkably low energy recovery compared to specialized brachiating species. We demonstrate that relatively long forelimb length and high grip forces, a proxy for global forelimb force-generating potential, act as the main driving factors to reduce energetic mechanical costs through effective pendular recovery.AbstractBrachiation is a form of suspensory locomotion observed only in Primates. The non-human hominoids (e.g., gibbons, orangutans, chimpanzees, and gorillas) are considered specialized brachiators, yet peculiar among the living apes are anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens), who have forgone this locomotor mode in favor of bipedal striding. Humans can, however, brachiate and seem to have retained the locomotor capabilities of their arboreal ancestors. However, the mechanics of human brachiation have not been quantified. In this study, we evaluate how closely human brachiation conforms to the expectations of simple pendular motion using triaxial accelerometry and high-speed videography. These data are compared to specialized brachiating non-human primates. We found that humans have lower energy recovery than siamangs (Symphalangus syndactylus) during brachiation and have shorter observed pendular periods than expected compared to other primates. We demonstrate that relatively long forelimb length and high grip forces, a proxy for global forelimb force-generating potential, act as the main driving factors to reduce energetic costs through effective pendular recovery. These data are the first to assess the strategies humans adopt to perform a behavior they are not anatomically specialized to execute and places them within a comparative framework amongst other brachiating primates. We show that although humans demonstrate behavioral flexibility during brachiation (e.g., differing mediolateral and vertical center of mass positional movement patterns), anatomical features are the primary driver of variation in brachiation performance.