PurposeTo investigate the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin-TACE in treating primary hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsThe data of 536 patients who underwent TACE in the interventional department from January 2016 to January 2020 were collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to the chemotherapeutic drugs used in TACE.: the epirubicin-TACE group (N = 260) and the lobaplatin-TACE group (N = 276). Primary study endpoint: (1) The tumor response after TACE; (2) The survival rates; Secondary study endpoints:(1) Changes in liver function and blood routine before and after TACE; (2) Occurrence of the post-embolization syndrome and infection after TACE.ResultsThe ORR was 35.0% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 51.1% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.001). The DCR was 73.1% in the epirubicin-TACE group and 82.2% in the lobaplatin-TACE group (p=0.011). The 6-month, 9-month, 12-month, and 15-month survival rates were higher in the lobaplatin-TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.029,p=0.001,p=0.005,p=0.002). mOS: Epirubicin-TACE group,14.8 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,18.6 months (p=0.007). mPFS: Epirubicin-TACE group,9.5 months; Lobaplatin-TACE group,12.8 months (P =0.000). There was no statistical difference in ALT, AST, total bilirubin and Leucocyte after TACE between the two groups (p=0.343,p=0.368,p=0.288,p=0.359). The platelet decrease after TACE was more significant in the lobaplatin-TACE group than in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.046). There was no statistical difference in the incidence rate of abdominal pain, fever and infection after TACE between the two groups (p=0.502,p=0.602,p=0.726). The incidence of vomiting after TACE in the lobaplatin-TACE group was higher than that in the epirubicin-TACE group (p=0.003).ConclusionLobaplatin-TACE has a higher tumor response rate and survival rate. Lobaplatin-TACE is a safe and effective treatment strategy; it is worthy of clinical application.