BackgroundIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic condition characterized by persistent abdominal pain or discomfort and impaired bowel function. Symptoms often vary in onset and severity, are worse during flare-ups, and affect the patient's quality of life. A positive diagnosis of IBS based on clinical symptoms may lead to a better outcome. There are different diagnostic criteria like Kruis score, Manning criteria, Rome I, II, III, and IV criteria, and each new one addresses the deficiencies of the previous ones. We analyze the effectiveness of the most commonly used diagnostic criteria associated with clinical examinations and laboratory tests in treating IBS in these studies.MethodologyThis is a retrospective study in which data from IBS subjects were collected by simple random sampling and compared using Manning criteria, Kruis score, and Rome IV criteria. Laboratory tests included complete blood count (CBC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP).ResultsOf the 130 patients, IBS is more prevalent in adults aged 30-50 years, with a male predominance. The Kruis score outperformed the Manning criterion in distinguishing between organic bowel disease and IBS. This, together with the Rome IV criteria, increases the likelihood of identifying IBS.ConclusionsDifferentiating IBS from functional and organic gastrointestinal problems is critical. Irritable bowel syndrome can be diagnosed using symptom-based diagnostic criteria. Clinical observation and physical examination should be supplemented with laboratory indicators.