AbstractBackgroundThis cross‐sectional study aimed to identify latent sensitization profiles of asthma patients in mainland China, unveiling the association between regional differences and sensitization patterns.Methods1056 asthma participants from 10 medical centers divided into eastern and western cohorts were clustered into four individual sensitization patterns, respectively, by using an unsupervised statistical modeling method, latent class analysis (LCA), based on the levels of 12 aeroallergens specific IgE reactivities. Moreover, differences in clinical characteristics and environmental exposures were compared in different sensitization patterns.ResultsFour distinct sensitization patterns in the two cohorts were defined as follows, respectively. Eastern cohort: Class 1: “High weed pollen and house dust mites (HDMs) sensitization” (8.87%), Class 2: “HDMs dominated sensitization” (38.38%), Class 3: “High HDMs and animal dander sensitization” (6.95%), Class 4: “Low/no aeroallergen sensitization” (45.80%). Western cohort: Class 1: “High weed pollen sensitization” (26.14%), Class 2: “High multi‐pollen sensitization” (15.02%), Class 3: “HDMs‐dominated sensitization” (10.33%), Class 4: “Low/no aeroallergen sensitization” (48.51%). Of note, the significant statistical difference in age, asthma control test score (ACT) and comorbidities were observed within or between different sensitization patterns. Exposure factors in different sensitization patterns were pointed out.ConclusionsAsthmatic patients with distinct sensitization patterns were clustered and identified through the LCA method, disclosing the relationship between sensitization profiles of multiple aeroallergens and geographical differences, providing novel insights and potential strategies for atopic disease monitoring, management and prevention in clinical practice.