Background and Objective: This meta-analysis was performed to compare the effectiveness of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures.Methods: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane-Library databases were searched to retrieve prospective randomized-controlled studies that compared the efficacy of surgical treatment and conservative treatment in adult ankle fractures. The meta package in R language was used to organize and analyze the obtained data.Results: A total of eight studies involving 2081 patients was considered eligible, including 1029 patients receiving surgical treatment and 1052 receiving conservative treatment. This systematic review and meta-analysis was prospectively registered on PROSPERO, and the registration number is CRD42018520164. Olerud and Molander ankle-fracture scores (OMAS) and the health survey 12-item Short-Form (SF-12) were used as main outcome indicators, and the follow-up outcomes were grouped according to the follow-up time. Meta-analysis results showed significantly higher OMAS scores in patients receiving surgical treatment than those with conservative treatment at six months (MD = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.07; 1.93) and over 24 months (MD = 3.10, 95% CI: 2.46; 3.74), while this statistical significance was absent at 12–24 months (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: −5.80; 5.96). At six months and 12 months after treatment, patients receiving surgical treatment exhibited significantly higher SF12-physical results than those receiving conservative treatment (MD = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.89; 2.91). The MD of SF12-mental data at six months after meta-analysis was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39), and the MD of SF12-mental data at 12+ months was −0.81 (95% CI: −1.22; 0.39). There was no significant difference in SF12-mental results between the two treatment methods after six months, but after 12 months, the SF12-mental results of patients receiving surgical treatment were significantly lower than those of conservative treatment.Conclusions: In the treatment of adult ankle fractures, surgical treatment is more efficacious than conservative treatment in improving early and long-term joint function and physical health of patients, but it is associated with long-term adverse mental health.