IntroductionFractures of the acetabulum are inherently complex due to the anatomy of the innominate bones and also the presence of several vital neurovascular structures in the vicinity. Thus, the treatment of pelvic ring and acetabulum fractures is riddled with complexities and is considered among the most challenging surgeries for an orthopedic surgeon.When anterior access is necessary, such as in the anterior column, both columns, anterior column posterior hemitransverse, transverse, and T-type fractures, both the ilioinguinal and the anterior intrapelvic (AIP) or modified Rives-Stoppa methods are employed. The aim of this study is to compare the results from acetabular fractures treated with a modified Stoppa and ilioinguinal technique.Materials and methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study to compare the outcomes of anterior acetabular fracture fixation using the modified Stoppa approach and the ilioinguinal approach. The outcomes measured were the amount of intraoperative bleeding, surgery duration, postoperative quality of fracture reduction, postoperative drain collection, and postoperative neurovascular status.The functional outcome was measured at three, six, and 12 months using the Merle d'Aubigné score. The radiological outcome was measured using the Matta scoring system.ResultsA significant difference was noticed in the two groups in the average blood loss and surgical duration, where the mean blood loss was 911.67 ± 143.05 ml in the ilioinguinal approach and 748.33 ± 165.30 ml in the modified Stoppa approach. While the ilioinguinal approach had a mean surgical duration of 190.33 ± 29.42 minutes, the modified Stoppa approach had 151.33 ± 23 minutes. The difference in postoperative fracture reduction in both groups was insignificant. The lateral femoral cutaneous nerve was compromised in 8.33% of cases in group A. The obturator nerve was compromised in 6.67% of cases in group B. The postoperative functional outcome was assessed by the modified Merle d’Aubigné score, and the radiological outcome was evaluated by the Matta score. The results obtained in both our study arms were comparable.ConclusionBased on our results, we can safely advocate the superiority of the Stoppa approach over a more extensive ilioinguinal approach. By virtue of being shorter in surgical duration and causing lesser blood loss, the Stoppa approach seems to be a better alternative, especially in elderly or polytrauma patients.As no difference was noted in the postoperative outcomes both clinically and radiologically, no approach showed superiority over the other in terms of patients’ eventual functional outcomes.