ABSTRACTIdentification of plasmids in bacterial genomes is critical for many factors, including horizontal gene transfer, antibiotic resistance genes, host-microbe interactions, cloning vectors, and industrial production. There are severalin silicomethods to predict plasmid sequences in assembled genomes. However, existing methods have evident shortcomings, such as unbalance in sensitivity and specificity, dependency on species-specific models, and performance reduction in sequences shorter than 10 kb, which has limited their scope of applicability. In this work, we proposed Plasmer, a novel plasmid predictor based on machine-learning of shared k-mers and genomic features. Unlike existing k-mer or genomic-feature based methods, Plasmer employs the random forest algorithm to make predictions using the percent of shared k-mers with plasmid and chromosome databases combined with other genomic features, including alignment E value and replicon distribution scores (RDS). Plasmer can predict on multiple species and has achieved an average the area under the curve (AUC) of 0.996 with accuracy of 98.4%. Compared to existing methods, tests of both sliding sequences and simulated andde novoassemblies have consistently shown that Plasmer has outperforming accuracy and stable performance across long and short contigs above 500 bp, demonstrating its applicability for fragmented assemblies. Plasmer also has excellent and balanced performance on both sensitivity and specificity (both >0.95 above 500 bp) with the highest F1-score, which has eliminated the bias on sensitivity or specificity that was common in existing methods. Plasmer also provides taxonomy classification to help identify the origin of plasmids.IMPORTANCEIn this study, we proposed a novel plasmid prediction tool named Plasmer. Technically, unlike existing k-mer or genomic features-based methods, Plasmer is the first tool to combine the advantages of the percent of shared k-mers and the alignment score of genomic features. This has given Plasmer (i) evident improvement in performance compared to other methods, with the best F1-score and accuracy on sliding sequences, simulated contigs, andde novoassemblies; (ii) applicability for contigs above 500 bp with highest accuracy, enabling plasmid prediction in fragmented short-read assemblies; (iii) excellent and balanced performance between sensitivity and specificity (both >0.95 above 500 bp) with the highest F1-score, which eliminated the bias on sensitivity or specificity that commonly existed in other methods; and (iv) no dependency of species-specific training models. We believe that Plasmer provides a more reliable alternative for plasmid prediction in bacterial genome assemblies.