BackgroundLiver-to-spleen signal intensity ratio (LSR) is evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the hepatobiliary phase and has been reported as a useful radiological assessment of regional liver function. However, LSR is a passive (non-time-associated) assessment of liver function, not a dynamic (time-associated) assessment. Moreover, LSR shows limitations such as a dose bias of contrast medium and a timing bias of imaging. Previous studies have reported the advantages of time-associated liver functional assessment as a precise assessment of liver function. For instance, the indocyanine green (ICG) disappearance rate, which is calculated from serum ICG concentrations at multiple time points, reflects a precise preoperative liver function for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure without the dose bias of ICG or the timing bias of blood sampling. The aim of this study was to develop a novel time-associated radiological liver functional assessment and verify its correlation with traditional liver functional parameters.MethodsA total of 279 pancreatic cancer patients were evaluated to clarify fundamental time-associated changes to LSR in normal liver. We defined the time-associated radiological assessment of liver function, calculated using information on LSR from four time points, as the “LSR increasing rate” (LSRi). We then investigated correlations between LSRi and previous liver functional parameters. Furthermore, we evaluated how timing bias and protocol bias affect LSRi.ResultsSignificant correlations were observed between LSRi and previous liver functional parameters such as total bilirubin, Child-Pugh grade, and albumin-bilirubin grade (P< 0.001 each). Moreover, considerably high correlations were observed between LSRi calculated using four time points and that calculated using three time points (r> 0.973 each), indicating that the timing bias of imaging was minimal.ConclusionsThis study propose a novel time-associated radiological assessment, and revealed that the LSRi correlated significantly with traditional liver functional parameters. Changes in LSR over time may provide a superior preoperative assessment of regional liver function that is better for predicting post-hepatectomy liver failure than LSR using the hepatobiliary phase alone.