Simple SummaryPain in animals is an important problem as a lack of verbal communication might underestimate their perception and thus lead to undertreatment. Abdominal surgery is frequently performed in dogs, be it elective or for curative reasons. Recommendations to administer a local anaesthetic agent (i.e., a drug that inhibits pain at the site where it is administered) into the abdomen are existing without knowing how good they really work to prevent pain after surgery. In this study, pain, sedation level, the heart rate and opioid requirements were assessed in dogs that underwent abdominal surgery for an underlying disease. Half of the dogs received the investigated drug ropivacaine, while the other half received saline. Pain and sedation level were assessed using scientifically established scores. Rescue analgesia was provided if necessary. Sedation, pain on one score, and sensitivity to pressure next to the surgical wound were not different between both groups. Another pain score achieved slightly higher scores in dogs treated with ropivacaine, and the heart rate was lower in this group. These findings lead to the conclusion that the dosage and concentration used in this study should not be investigated further and cannot be promoted for clinical use.AbstractRecommendations for intraperitoneal (IP) and incisional (INC) administration of local anaesthetics after visceral surgery exist, but evidence is scarce. This prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled, clinical trial compared postoperative pain in dogs undergoing major abdominal surgery. Sixteen client-owned dogs were anaesthetized with a standardized balanced protocol including opioids and received either 2 mg/kg ropivacaine IP (0.27 mL/kg) and a 1 mg/kg INC splash (0.13 mL/kg) or equal volumes of saline. Influence of the treatment on heart rate (HR) and postoperative pain was assessed using the Short Form of the Glasgow Composite Pain Scale (GCPS-SF), a dynamic interactive visual analogue scale (DIVAS) and mechanical nociceptive threshold testing (MNT). Data was tested with mixed ordinal regression and log linear mixed models for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after extubation. Rescue analgesia was given to 3/8 dogs after ropivacaine and 0/8 dogs after saline. GCPS-SF and MNT were not different between groups. DIVAS was slightly higher after ropivacaine (odds increased by 5.44 (confidence interval (CI) 1.17–9.96,p= 0.012)), and HR after ropivacaine was 0.76 * that after saline (CI 0.61–0.96,p= 0.02) with no effect of time (p= 0.1). Undiluted ropivacaine IP and INC was not beneficial for postoperative analgesia.