AbstractBackgroundWhile computed tomography (CT)-guided liver biopsies are commonly performed using unenhanced images, contrast-enhanced images are beneficial for challenging puncture pathways and lesion locations. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of CT-guided biopsies for intrahepatic lesions using unenhanced, intravenous (IV)-enhanced, or intra-arterial Lipiodol-marked CT for lesion marking.Patients and methodsSix-hundred-seven patients (men: 358 [59.0%], mean age 61 years; SD ±12.04) with suspect hepatic lesions and CT-guided liver biopsies were retrospectively evaluated. Successful biopsies were histopathological findings other than typical liver tissue or non-specific findings. Data was ascertained regarding the use of contrast medium for the biopsy-planning CT, unenhanced (group 1)vs.Lipiodol (group 2)vs.IV contrast (group 3). Technical success and influencing factors were insulated. Complications were noted. The results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon-Man-Whitney t-test, Chi-square test, and Spearman-Rho.ResultsOverall lesion hitting rate was 73.1%, with significantly better rates using Lipiodol-marked lesions (79.3%) compared to group 1 (73.8%) and group 3 (65.2%) (p = 0.037). Smaller lesions (<20 mm diameter) benefited significantly from Lipiodol-marking with 71.2% successful biopsy rate compared to group 1 (65.5%) and group 3 (47.7%) (p = 0.021). Liver cirrhosis (p = 0.94) and entity of parenchymal lesions (p = 0.78) had no impact on the hitting rate between the groups. No major complications occurred during the interventions.ConclusionsPre-biopsy Lipiodol marking of suspect hepatic lesions significantly increases the lesion-hitting rate and is especially beneficial for biopsy of smaller targets below 20 mm diameter. Further, Lipiodol marking is superior to IV contrast for non-visible lesions in unenhanced CT. Target lesion entity has no impact on the hitting rate.