ObjectivesAccumulating evidence shows that mesenchymal transition of glioblastomas is associated with a more aggressive course of disease and therapy resistance. In WHO2021-defined adult-type diffuse gliomas of lower grade (dLGG), the transition of the tumor phenotype over time, has not been studied. Most efforts to correlate proneural, classical or mesenchymal phenotype with outcome in dLGG were made prior to the WHO 2021 classification. Here, we set out to investigate if phenotype predicted survival and tumor recurrence in a clinical cohort of dLGGs, re-classified according to the 2021 WHO criteria.MethodsUsing a TMA-based approach with five immunohistochemical markers (EGFR, p53, MERTK, CD44 and OLIG2), we investigated 183 primary and 49 recurrent tumors derived from patients with previously diagnosed dLGG. Of the 49 relapses, nine tumors recurred a second time, and one a third time.ResultsIn total, 71.0% of all tumors could be subtyped. Proneural was most dominant in IDH-mut tumors (78.5%), mesenchymal more common among IDH-wt tumors (63.6%). There was a significant difference in survival between classical, proneural and mesenchymal phenotypes in the total cohort (p<0.001), but not after molecular stratification (IDH-mut: p = 0.220, IDH-wt: p = 0.623). Upon recurrence, proneural was retained in 66.7% of the proneural IDH-mut dLGGs (n = 21), whereas IDH-wt tumors (n = 10) mainly retained or gained mesenchymal phenotype. No significant difference in survival was found between IDH-mut gliomas remaining proneural and those shifting to mesenchymal phenotype (p = 0.347).ConclusionSubtyping into classical, proneural and mesenchymal phenotypes by five immunohistochemical markers, was possible for the majority of tumors, but protein signatures did not correlate with patient survival in our WHO2021-stratified cohort. At recurrence, IDH-mut tumors mainly retained proneural, while IDH-wt tumors mostly retained or gained mesenchymal signatures. This phenotypic shift, associated with increased aggressiveness in glioblastoma, did not affect survival. Group sizes were, however, too small to draw any firm conclusions.