Simple SummaryAntibiotic usage in swine husbandry contributes to the emergence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, posing a serious threat to public health. Consequently, alternative strategies are required to mitigate this issue. In a previous study, we showed that the replacement of metaphylactic antimicrobials with an administration ofLigilactobacillus salivariusMP100 for two years to sows and piglets changed the fecal microbiota and short-chain fatty acid profiles in an intensive pig farm. In this work, we compared the productivity-related data between a 2-year period of routine metaphylactic antibiotherapy and the first 2 years in which such a practice was replaced by the probiotic strain. Subsequently, the composition of the meat of the animals ingesting the probiotic strain was compared to that of animals with a similar diet but receiving metaphylactic antibiotherapy. This probiotic intake did not negatively alter the composition of the meat and was associated with an increase in the concentration of inosine and a slight tendency for increasing the thickness of the subcutaneour lumbar fat and intramuscular fat content. These factors are considered as biomarkers of meat quality and health. Therefore, the substitution of metaphylactic antimicrobials with a daily administration of the probiotic strain was associated with beneficial productivity and quality outcomes.AbstractThe metaphylactic use of antimicrobials in swine farms contributes to the emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, which constitutes a major challenge for public health. Alternative strategies are required to eradicate their routine use. In a previous study, metaphylactic antimicrobials were replaced by the administration ofLigilactobacillus salivariusMP100 to sows and piglets for two years. This practice positively modified the fecal microbiota and metabolic profiles in the farm. In this work, the farm dataset was used to compare the productivity-related parameters between a 2-year period of routine metaphylactic antibiotherapy and the first 2 years of a replacement with the probiotic strain. The probiotic period improved these productivity-related parameters, from litter size to growth performance. In addition, samples ofLongissimus lumborum, including skin and subcutaneous fat, were obtained from the animals ingesting the probiotic strain and controls (metaphylactic antibiotherapy) and analyzed for their pH, water holding capacity, composition, and metabolic profiling. The probiotic intake did not negatively affect the meat composition and was associated with an increase in inosine concentration and a slight tendency for increasing the intramuscular fat content. These factors are considered as biomarkers of meat quality. In conclusion, the substitution of metaphylactic antimicrobials with the administration of the probiotic strain was associated with beneficial productivity and meat quality outcomes.