As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Il trouve l'opposition de théologiens comme Lanfranc de Pavie (vers 1010-1089) et Hildebert de Lavardin (1056-1133), qui défendent l'idée d'un changement de substance : la « transsubstantiation » telle qu'on l'appelle à partir du XIIe siècle, puis au IVe concile de Latran (1215).
Postion	Tokenization
1	Il
2	trouve
3	l'
4	opposition
5	de
6	théologiens
7	comme
8	Lanfranc
9	de
10	Pavie
11	(
12	vers
13	1010-1089
14	)
15	et
16	Hildebert
17	de
18	Lavardin
19	(
20	1056-1133
21	)
22	,
23	qui
24	défendent
25	l'
26	idée
27	d'
28	un
29	changement
30	de
31	substance
32	:
33	la
34	«
35	transsubstantiation
36	»
37	telle
38	qu'
39	on
40	l'
41	appelle
42	à
43	partir
44	du
45	de
46	le
47	XIIe
48	siècle
49	,
50	puis
51	au
52	à
53	le
54	IVe
55	concile
56	de
57	Latran
58	(
59	1215
60	)
61	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Il	PRON	2	nsubj
2	trouve	VERB	0	root
3	l'	DET	4	det
4	opposition	NOUN	2	obj
5	de	ADP	6	case
6	théologiens	NOUN	4	nmod
7	comme	ADP	8	case
8	Lanfranc	PROPN	6	nmod
9	de	ADP	10	case
10	Pavie	PROPN	8	nmod
11	(	PUNCT	13	punct
12	vers	ADP	13	case
13	1010-1089	NUM	8	nmod
14	)	PUNCT	13	punct
15	et	CCONJ	16	cc
16	Hildebert	PROPN	8	conj
17	de	ADP	18	case
18	Lavardin	PROPN	16	nmod
19	(	PUNCT	20	punct
20	1056-1133	NUM	16	nmod
21	)	PUNCT	20	punct
22	,	PUNCT	24	punct
23	qui	PRON	24	nsubj
24	défendent	VERB	6	acl:relcl
25	l'	DET	26	det
26	idée	NOUN	24	obj
27	d'	ADP	29	case
28	un	DET	29	det
29	changement	NOUN	26	nmod
30	de	ADP	31	case
31	substance	NOUN	29	nmod
32	:	PUNCT	35	punct
33	la	DET	35	det
34	«	PUNCT	35	punct
35	transsubstantiation	NOUN	29	appos
36	»	PUNCT	35	punct
37	telle	ADJ	35	amod
38	qu'	SCONJ	41	mark
39	on	PRON	41	nsubj
40	l'	PRON	41	obj
41	appelle	VERB	37	ccomp:obj
42	à	ADP	41	advmod
43	partir	VERB	42	fixed
44	du	_	None	_
45	de	ADP	47	case
46	le	DET	47	det
47	XIIe	ADJ	47	amod
48	siècle	NOUN	42	obl:arg
49	,	PUNCT	53	punct
50	puis	ADV	53	cc
51	au	_	None	_
52	à	ADP	53	case
53	le	DET	53	det
54	IVe	ADJ	53	amod
55	concile	NOUN	47	conj
56	de	ADP	55	case
57	Latran	PROPN	53	nmod
58	(	PUNCT	57	punct
59	1215	NUM	53	nmod
60	)	PUNCT	57	punct
61	.	PUNCT	2	punct