As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Lyon s'en sortait bien à la mi-temps avec un score de parité, et Nancy pouvait nourrir quelques regrets : les lorrains avaient peut-être laissé passer leur chance.
Postion	Tokenization
1	Lyon
2	s'
3	en
4	sortait
5	bien
6	à
7	la
8	mi-temps
9	avec
10	un
11	score
12	de
13	parité
14	,
15	et
16	Nancy
17	pouvait
18	nourrir
19	quelques
20	regrets
21	:
22	les
23	lorrains
24	avaient
25	peut-être
26	laissé
27	passer
28	leur
29	chance
30	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Lyon	PROPN	4	nsubj
2	s'	PRON	4	dep:comp
3	en	PRON	4	dep:comp
4	sortait	VERB	0	root
5	bien	ADV	4	advmod
6	à	ADP	8	case
7	la	DET	8	det
8	mi-temps	NOUN	4	obl:mod
9	avec	ADP	11	case
10	un	DET	11	det
11	score	NOUN	4	obl:mod
12	de	ADP	13	case
13	parité	NOUN	11	nmod
14	,	PUNCT	17	punct
15	et	CCONJ	17	cc
16	Nancy	PROPN	17	nsubj
17	pouvait	VERB	4	conj
18	nourrir	VERB	17	xcomp:obj
19	quelques	DET	20	det
20	regrets	NOUN	18	obj
21	:	PUNCT	26	punct
22	les	DET	23	det
23	lorrains	NOUN	26	nsubj
24	avaient	AUX	26	aux:tense
25	peut-être	ADV	26	advmod
26	laissé	VERB	4	parataxis
27	passer	VERB	26	xcomp:obj
28	leur	DET	29	det
29	chance	NOUN	27	obj
30	.	PUNCT	26	punct