As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
No podía ser indiferente a la filosofía práctica que trasladase Kant a ella mecánicamente las rígidas dicotomías de la primera Crítica, con sus dificultades, como han puesto de relieve excelentes conocedores del kantismo, desde Schopenhauer hasta Paul Ricoeur, y como se evidencia en el cuasimaniqueismo con que la Fundamentación contrapone el orden del deber al orden de las inclinaciones.
Postion	Tokenization
1	No
2	podía
3	ser
4	indiferente
5	a
6	la
7	filosofía
8	práctica
9	que
10	trasladase
11	Kant
12	a
13	ella
14	mecánicamente
15	las
16	rígidas
17	dicotomías
18	de
19	la
20	primera
21	Crítica
22	,
23	con
24	sus
25	dificultades
26	,
27	como
28	han
29	puesto
30	de
31	relieve
32	excelentes
33	conocedores
34	del
35	kantismo
36	,
37	desde
38	Schopenhauer
39	hasta
40	Paul
41	Ricoeur
42	,
43	y
44	como
45	se
46	evidencia
47	en
48	el
49	cuasimaniqueismo
50	con
51	que
52	la
53	Fundamentación
54	contrapone
55	el
56	orden
57	del
58	deber
59	al
60	orden
61	de
62	las
63	inclinaciones
64	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	No	ADV	4	advmod
2	podía	AUX	4	aux
3	ser	AUX	4	cop
4	indiferente	ADJ	0	root
5	a	ADP	7	case
6	la	DET	7	det
7	filosofía	NOUN	4	obj
8	práctica	ADJ	7	amod
9	que	SCONJ	10	mark
10	trasladase	VERB	4	csubj
11	Kant	PROPN	10	nsubj
12	a	ADP	13	case
13	ella	PRON	10	obl
14	mecánicamente	ADV	10	advmod
15	las	DET	17	det
16	rígidas	ADJ	17	amod
17	dicotomías	NOUN	10	obj
18	de	ADP	21	case
19	la	DET	21	det
20	primera	ADJ	21	amod
21	Crítica	PROPN	17	nmod
22	,	PUNCT	25	punct
23	con	ADP	25	case
24	sus	DET	25	det
25	dificultades	NOUN	10	obl
26	,	PUNCT	25	punct
27	como	SCONJ	29	mark
28	han	AUX	29	aux
29	puesto	VERB	10	advcl
30	de	ADP	31	case
31	relieve	NOUN	29	obj
32	excelentes	ADJ	33	amod
33	conocedores	NOUN	29	nsubj
34	del	ADP	35	case
35	kantismo	PROPN	33	nmod
36	,	PUNCT	38	punct
37	desde	ADP	38	case
38	Schopenhauer	PROPN	33	nmod
39	hasta	ADP	40	case
40	Paul	PROPN	33	nmod
41	Ricoeur	PROPN	40	flat
42	,	PUNCT	46	punct
43	y	CCONJ	46	cc
44	como	SCONJ	46	mark
45	se	PRON	46	expl:impers
46	evidencia	VERB	29	conj
47	en	ADP	49	case
48	el	DET	49	det
49	cuasimaniqueismo	NOUN	46	obl
50	con	ADP	51	case
51	que	PRON	54	obl
52	la	DET	53	det
53	Fundamentación	PROPN	54	nsubj
54	contrapone	VERB	49	acl
55	el	DET	56	det
56	orden	NOUN	54	obj
57	del	ADP	58	case
58	deber	NOUN	56	nmod
59	al	ADP	60	case
60	orden	NOUN	54	obj
61	de	ADP	63	case
62	las	DET	63	det
63	inclinaciones	NOUN	60	nmod
64	.	PUNCT	4	punct