As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
No había ninguna razón para creerlo: no se conocían, no se habían visto nunca, y Fermina Daza no tenía nada que ver con las decisiones del concurso, si bien estaba al corriente de sus secretos.
Postion	Tokenization
1	No
2	había
3	ninguna
4	razón
5	para
6	creerlo
7	creer
8	lo
9	:
10	no
11	se
12	conocían
13	,
14	no
15	se
16	habían
17	visto
18	nunca
19	,
20	y
21	Fermina
22	Daza
23	no
24	tenía
25	nada
26	que
27	ver
28	con
29	las
30	decisiones
31	del
32	concurso
33	,
34	si
35	bien
36	estaba
37	al
38	corriente
39	de
40	sus
41	secretos
42	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	No	ADV	2	advmod
2	había	AUX	0	root
3	ninguna	DET	4	det
4	razón	NOUN	2	obj
5	para	ADP	6	mark
6	creerlo	_	None	_
7	creer	VERB	4	acl
8	lo	PRON	6	obj
9	:	PUNCT	11	punct
10	no	ADV	11	advmod
11	se	PRON	11	obj
12	conocían	VERB	2	advcl
13	,	PUNCT	16	punct
14	no	ADV	16	advmod
15	se	PRON	16	obj
16	habían	AUX	16	aux
17	visto	VERB	11	advcl
18	nunca	ADV	16	advmod
19	,	PUNCT	16	punct
20	y	CCONJ	23	cc
21	Fermina	PROPN	23	nsubj
22	Daza	PROPN	20	flat
23	no	ADV	23	advmod
24	tenía	VERB	11	conj
25	nada	PRON	23	obl
26	que	SCONJ	26	mark
27	ver	VERB	23	xcomp
28	con	ADP	29	case
29	las	DET	29	det
30	decisiones	NOUN	23	obj
31	del	ADP	31	case
32	concurso	NOUN	29	nmod
33	,	PUNCT	37	punct
34	si	SCONJ	37	mark
35	bien	ADV	33	fixed
36	estaba	AUX	37	cop
37	al	ADP	37	case
38	corriente	NOUN	23	advcl
39	de	ADP	40	case
40	sus	DET	40	det
41	secretos	NOUN	37	nmod
42	.	PUNCT	2	punct