As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Miloc comentó que hubo defectos en el partido contra Belice, pero también virtudes, y recalcó que "todos los partidos son distintos" y que "siempre lo dije que si ganábamos estaría contento".
Postion	Tokenization
1	Miloc
2	comentó
3	que
4	hubo
5	defectos
6	en
7	el
8	partido
9	contra
10	Belice
11	,
12	pero
13	también
14	virtudes
15	,
16	y
17	recalcó
18	que
19	"
20	todos
21	los
22	partidos
23	son
24	distintos
25	"
26	y
27	que
28	"
29	siempre
30	lo
31	dije
32	que
33	si
34	ganábamos
35	estaría
36	contento
37	"
38	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Miloc	PROPN	2	nsubj
2	comentó	VERB	0	root
3	que	SCONJ	4	mark
4	hubo	AUX	2	ccomp
5	defectos	NOUN	4	obj
6	en	ADP	8	case
7	el	DET	8	det
8	partido	NOUN	4	obl
9	contra	ADP	10	case
10	Belice	PROPN	8	nmod
11	,	PUNCT	14	punct
12	pero	CCONJ	14	cc
13	también	ADV	14	advmod
14	virtudes	NOUN	4	conj
15	,	PUNCT	17	punct
16	y	CCONJ	17	cc
17	recalcó	VERB	2	conj
18	que	SCONJ	24	mark
19	"	PUNCT	24	punct
20	todos	DET	21	det
21	los	DET	22	det
22	partidos	NOUN	24	nsubj
23	son	AUX	24	cop
24	distintos	ADJ	17	ccomp
25	"	PUNCT	31	punct
26	y	CCONJ	31	cc
27	que	SCONJ	31	mark
28	"	PUNCT	31	punct
29	siempre	ADV	31	advmod
30	lo	PRON	31	iobj
31	dije	VERB	24	conj
32	que	SCONJ	36	mark
33	si	SCONJ	34	mark
34	ganábamos	VERB	36	advcl
35	estaría	AUX	36	cop
36	contento	ADJ	31	ccomp
37	"	PUNCT	31	punct
38	.	PUNCT	2	punct