As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
"No es falta de información, es ocultación de información", dijo Zenarruzabeitia, para quien la comparecencia de ayer de Mayor Oreja "no fue de recibo" porque en vez de "responder detalladamente" a la interpelación del PNV se dedicó a "la descalificación de un grupo político y a hablar de cuestiones que no tienen nada que ver, utilizó la política del chipirón de responder atacando".
Postion	Tokenization
1	"
2	No
3	es
4	falta
5	de
6	información
7	,
8	es
9	ocultación
10	de
11	información
12	"
13	,
14	dijo
15	Zenarruzabeitia
16	,
17	para
18	quien
19	la
20	comparecencia
21	de
22	ayer
23	de
24	Mayor
25	Oreja
26	"
27	no
28	fue
29	de
30	recibo
31	"
32	porque
33	en
34	vez
35	de
36	"
37	responder
38	detalladamente
39	"
40	a
41	la
42	interpelación
43	del
44	PNV
45	se
46	dedicó
47	a
48	"
49	la
50	descalificación
51	de
52	un
53	grupo
54	político
55	y
56	a
57	hablar
58	de
59	cuestiones
60	que
61	no
62	tienen
63	nada
64	que
65	ver
66	,
67	utilizó
68	la
69	política
70	del
71	chipirón
72	de
73	responder
74	atacando
75	"
76	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	"	PUNCT	4	punct
2	No	ADV	4	advmod
3	es	AUX	4	cop
4	falta	NOUN	14	ccomp
5	de	ADP	6	case
6	información	NOUN	4	nmod
7	,	PUNCT	4	punct
8	es	AUX	9	cop
9	ocultación	NOUN	4	advcl
10	de	ADP	11	case
11	información	NOUN	9	nmod
12	"	PUNCT	4	punct
13	,	PUNCT	4	punct
14	dijo	VERB	0	root
15	Zenarruzabeitia	PROPN	14	nsubj
16	,	PUNCT	30	punct
17	para	ADP	18	case
18	quien	PRON	30	obl
19	la	DET	20	det
20	comparecencia	NOUN	30	nsubj
21	de	ADP	22	case
22	ayer	ADV	20	advmod
23	de	ADP	24	case
24	Mayor	PROPN	20	nmod
25	Oreja	PROPN	24	flat
26	"	PUNCT	30	punct
27	no	ADV	30	advmod
28	fue	AUX	30	cop
29	de	ADP	30	case
30	recibo	NOUN	15	acl
31	"	PUNCT	30	punct
32	porque	SCONJ	46	mark
33	en	ADP	37	mark
34	vez	NOUN	33	fixed
35	de	ADP	33	fixed
36	"	PUNCT	37	punct
37	responder	VERB	46	advcl
38	detalladamente	ADV	37	advmod
39	"	PUNCT	37	punct
40	a	ADP	42	case
41	la	DET	42	det
42	interpelación	NOUN	37	obj
43	del	ADP	44	case
44	PNV	PROPN	42	nmod
45	se	PRON	46	expl:pass
46	dedicó	VERB	30	advcl
47	a	ADP	50	case
48	"	PUNCT	50	punct
49	la	DET	50	det
50	descalificación	NOUN	46	obj
51	de	ADP	53	case
52	un	DET	53	det
53	grupo	NOUN	50	nmod
54	político	ADJ	53	amod
55	y	CCONJ	57	cc
56	a	ADP	57	mark
57	hablar	VERB	50	conj
58	de	ADP	59	case
59	cuestiones	NOUN	57	obj
60	que	PRON	62	nsubj
61	no	ADV	62	advmod
62	tienen	VERB	59	acl
63	nada	PRON	62	obl
64	que	SCONJ	65	mark
65	ver	VERB	62	xcomp
66	,	PUNCT	46	punct
67	utilizó	VERB	46	advcl
68	la	DET	69	det
69	política	NOUN	67	obj
70	del	ADP	71	case
71	chipirón	NOUN	69	nmod
72	de	ADP	73	mark
73	responder	VERB	69	acl
74	atacando	VERB	73	xcomp
75	"	PUNCT	46	punct
76	.	PUNCT	14	punct