As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Si el PNV rompiera con EH, la dejaría de nuevo en manos de ETA, según el lehendakari, quien ante Aznar defendió la conveniencia de blindar la participación de la formación aberzale en las instituciones.
Postion	Tokenization
1	Si
2	el
3	PNV
4	rompiera
5	con
6	EH
7	,
8	la
9	dejaría
10	de
11	nuevo
12	en
13	manos
14	de
15	ETA
16	,
17	según
18	el
19	lehendakari
20	,
21	quien
22	ante
23	Aznar
24	defendió
25	la
26	conveniencia
27	de
28	blindar
29	la
30	participación
31	de
32	la
33	formación
34	aberzale
35	en
36	las
37	instituciones
38	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Si	SCONJ	4	mark
2	el	DET	3	det
3	PNV	PROPN	4	nsubj
4	rompiera	VERB	9	advcl
5	con	ADP	6	case
6	EH	PROPN	4	obj
7	,	PUNCT	4	punct
8	la	PRON	9	obj
9	dejaría	VERB	0	root
10	de	ADP	9	advmod
11	nuevo	ADJ	10	fixed
12	en	ADP	15	case
13	manos	NOUN	12	fixed
14	de	ADP	12	fixed
15	ETA	PROPN	9	obl
16	,	PUNCT	19	punct
17	según	ADP	19	case
18	el	DET	19	det
19	lehendakari	NOUN	9	obl
20	,	PUNCT	24	punct
21	quien	PRON	24	nsubj
22	ante	ADP	23	case
23	Aznar	PROPN	24	obl
24	defendió	VERB	19	acl
25	la	DET	26	det
26	conveniencia	NOUN	24	obj
27	de	ADP	28	mark
28	blindar	VERB	26	acl
29	la	DET	30	det
30	participación	NOUN	28	obj
31	de	ADP	33	case
32	la	DET	33	det
33	formación	NOUN	30	nmod
34	aberzale	ADJ	33	amod
35	en	ADP	37	case
36	las	DET	37	det
37	instituciones	NOUN	30	nmod
38	.	PUNCT	9	punct