As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
El otro día, cuando oí decir a Núñez que la profesionalidad de Van Gaal se demostraba en el desconocimiento que tenía de jugadores como Rivaldo o McManaman, pensé que, tal y como señalábamos algunos, estábamos en manos de un técnico limitadísimo, desafortunado a la hora de fichar y conocedor únicamente del mercado holandés, y visto lo bueno que es Hasselbaink, ni eso.
Postion	Tokenization
1	El
2	otro
3	día
4	,
5	cuando
6	oí
7	decir
8	a
9	Núñez
10	que
11	la
12	profesionalidad
13	de
14	Van
15	Gaal
16	se
17	demostraba
18	en
19	el
20	desconocimiento
21	que
22	tenía
23	de
24	jugadores
25	como
26	Rivaldo
27	o
28	McManaman
29	,
30	pensé
31	que
32	,
33	tal
34	y
35	como
36	señalábamos
37	algunos
38	,
39	estábamos
40	en
41	manos
42	de
43	un
44	técnico
45	limitadísimo
46	,
47	desafortunado
48	a
49	la
50	hora
51	de
52	fichar
53	y
54	conocedor
55	únicamente
56	del
57	mercado
58	holandés
59	,
60	y
61	visto
62	lo
63	bueno
64	que
65	es
66	Hasselbaink
67	,
68	ni
69	eso
70	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	El	DET	3	det
2	otro	DET	1	det
3	día	NOUN	30	obl
4	,	PUNCT	6	punct
5	cuando	PRON	6	obl
6	oí	VERB	3	acl
7	decir	VERB	6	xcomp
8	a	ADP	9	case
9	Núñez	PROPN	6	iobj
10	que	SCONJ	17	mark
11	la	DET	12	det
12	profesionalidad	NOUN	17	nsubj
13	de	ADP	14	case
14	Van	PROPN	12	nmod
15	Gaal	PROPN	14	flat
16	se	PRON	17	expl:pass
17	demostraba	VERB	6	ccomp
18	en	ADP	20	case
19	el	DET	20	det
20	desconocimiento	NOUN	17	obl
21	que	PRON	22	obj
22	tenía	VERB	20	acl
23	de	ADP	24	case
24	jugadores	NOUN	22	obj
25	como	SCONJ	26	mark
26	Rivaldo	PROPN	24	nmod
27	o	CCONJ	28	cc
28	McManaman	PROPN	26	conj
29	,	PUNCT	6	punct
30	pensé	VERB	0	root
31	que	SCONJ	44	mark
32	,	PUNCT	36	punct
33	tal	NOUN	36	mark
34	y	CCONJ	33	fixed
35	como	SCONJ	33	fixed
36	señalábamos	VERB	44	advcl
37	algunos	PRON	36	nsubj
38	,	PUNCT	36	punct
39	estábamos	AUX	44	cop
40	en	ADP	44	case
41	manos	NOUN	40	fixed
42	de	ADP	40	fixed
43	un	DET	44	det
44	técnico	NOUN	30	ccomp
45	limitadísimo	ADJ	44	amod
46	,	PUNCT	47	punct
47	desafortunado	ADJ	45	conj
48	a	ADP	50	case
49	la	DET	50	det
50	hora	NOUN	45	nmod
51	de	ADP	52	mark
52	fichar	VERB	50	acl
53	y	CCONJ	54	cc
54	conocedor	ADJ	45	conj
55	únicamente	ADV	54	advmod
56	del	ADP	55	case
57	mercado	NOUN	55	nmod
58	holandés	ADJ	57	amod
59	,	PUNCT	61	punct
60	y	CCONJ	61	advmod
61	visto	VERB	44	parataxis
62	lo	PRON	64	det
63	bueno	ADJ	64	amod
64	que	PRON	61	csubj
65	es	AUX	64	cop
66	Hasselbaink	PROPN	64	nsubj
67	,	PUNCT	61	punct
68	ni	ADV	69	advmod
69	eso	PRON	61	obj
70	.	PUNCT	30	punct