As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Almunia, quien explicó el programa económico del PSOE en un acto organizado por el Colegio de Economistas de Madrid, insistió en que la política exterior de España debe diseñarse de forma diferente atendiendo a esas actuaciones, ya que aseguró que hay riesgos para los intereses económicos españoles en países como Chile o Argentina y que puede haberlos en Perú, Venezuela o Brasil.
Postion	Tokenization
1	Almunia
2	,
3	quien
4	explicó
5	el
6	programa
7	económico
8	del
9	PSOE
10	en
11	un
12	acto
13	organizado
14	por
15	el
16	Colegio
17	de
18	Economistas
19	de
20	Madrid
21	,
22	insistió
23	en
24	que
25	la
26	política
27	exterior
28	de
29	España
30	debe
31	diseñarse
32	diseñar
33	se
34	de
35	forma
36	diferente
37	atendiendo
38	a
39	esas
40	actuaciones
41	,
42	ya
43	que
44	aseguró
45	que
46	hay
47	riesgos
48	para
49	los
50	intereses
51	económicos
52	españoles
53	en
54	países
55	como
56	Chile
57	o
58	Argentina
59	y
60	que
61	puede
62	haberlos
63	haber
64	los
65	en
66	Perú
67	,
68	Venezuela
69	o
70	Brasil
71	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Almunia	PROPN	22	nsubj
2	,	PUNCT	4	punct
3	quien	PRON	4	nsubj
4	explicó	VERB	1	acl
5	el	DET	6	det
6	programa	NOUN	4	obj
7	económico	ADJ	6	amod
8	del	ADP	9	case
9	PSOE	PROPN	6	nmod
10	en	ADP	12	case
11	un	DET	12	det
12	acto	NOUN	4	obl
13	organizado	ADJ	12	amod
14	por	ADP	16	case
15	el	DET	16	det
16	Colegio	PROPN	13	obj
17	de	ADP	18	case
18	Economistas	PROPN	16	flat
19	de	ADP	20	case
20	Madrid	PROPN	16	nmod
21	,	PUNCT	4	punct
22	insistió	VERB	0	root
23	en	ADP	31	mark
24	que	SCONJ	31	mark
25	la	DET	26	det
26	política	NOUN	31	nsubj
27	exterior	ADJ	26	amod
28	de	ADP	29	case
29	España	PROPN	26	nmod
30	debe	AUX	31	aux
31	diseñarse	_	None	_
32	diseñar	VERB	22	xcomp
33	se	PRON	31	expl:pass
34	de	ADP	34	case
35	forma	NOUN	31	obl
36	diferente	ADJ	34	amod
37	atendiendo	VERB	31	advcl
38	a	ADP	39	case
39	esas	DET	39	det
40	actuaciones	NOUN	36	obj
41	,	PUNCT	43	punct
42	ya	ADV	43	mark
43	que	SCONJ	41	fixed
44	aseguró	VERB	31	advcl
45	que	SCONJ	45	mark
46	hay	AUX	43	ccomp
47	riesgos	NOUN	45	obj
48	para	ADP	49	case
49	los	DET	49	det
50	intereses	NOUN	46	nmod
51	económicos	ADJ	49	amod
52	españoles	ADJ	49	amod
53	en	ADP	53	case
54	países	NOUN	49	nmod
55	como	SCONJ	55	mark
56	Chile	PROPN	53	nmod
57	o	CCONJ	57	cc
58	Argentina	PROPN	55	conj
59	y	CCONJ	61	cc
60	que	SCONJ	61	mark
61	puede	AUX	45	aux
62	haberlos	_	None	_
63	haber	AUX	45	conj
64	los	PRON	61	obj
65	en	ADP	64	case
66	Perú	PROPN	61	obl
67	,	PUNCT	66	punct
68	Venezuela	PROPN	64	conj
69	o	CCONJ	68	cc
70	Brasil	PROPN	64	conj
71	.	PUNCT	22	punct