As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
To be sure, both Lopez & Perez were conversos--but they were thought of in England as being, as they undoubtedly were, at least ethnically, Jews.>>
Postion	Tokenization
1	To
2	be
3	sure
4	,
5	both
6	Lopez
7	&
8	Perez
9	were
10	conversos
11	--
12	but
13	they
14	were
15	thought
16	of
17	in
18	England
19	as
20	being
21	,
22	as
23	they
24	undoubtedly
25	were
26	,
27	at
28	least
29	ethnically
30	,
31	Jews
32	.
33	>>
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	To	PART	3	mark
2	be	AUX	3	cop
3	sure	ADJ	10	parataxis
4	,	PUNCT	10	punct
5	both	CCONJ	6	cc:preconj
6	Lopez	PROPN	10	nsubj
7	&	CCONJ	8	cc
8	Perez	PROPN	6	conj
9	were	AUX	10	cop
10	conversos	NOUN	0	root
11	--	PUNCT	10	punct
12	but	CCONJ	15	cc
13	they	PRON	15	nsubj:pass
14	were	AUX	15	aux:pass
15	thought	VERB	10	conj
16	of	ADP	15	obl
17	in	ADP	18	case
18	England	PROPN	15	obl
19	as	SCONJ	31	mark
20	being	AUX	31	cop
21	,	PUNCT	31	punct
22	as	SCONJ	24	mark
23	they	PRON	24	nsubj
24	undoubtedly	ADV	31	advcl
25	were	AUX	24	cop
26	,	PUNCT	31	punct
27	at	ADV	29	advmod
28	least	ADV	27	fixed
29	ethnically	ADV	31	advmod
30	,	PUNCT	31	punct
31	Jews	PROPN	15	advcl
32	.	PUNCT	10	punct
33	>>	PUNCT	10	punct