As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
As I have told RNR, I think we should advise Duke in writing that its IP is not in conformity with the contract, sinceit is in the alternative, and that our IP is hence the only one that will be before the arbitrators (since Duke clearly cannot change it's ineffective IP at this stage, having already seen ours).
Postion	Tokenization
1	As
2	I
3	have
4	told
5	RNR
6	,
7	I
8	think
9	we
10	should
11	advise
12	Duke
13	in
14	writing
15	that
16	its
17	IP
18	is
19	not
20	in
21	conformity
22	with
23	the
24	contract
25	,
26	since
27	it
28	is
29	in
30	the
31	alternative
32	,
33	and
34	that
35	our
36	IP
37	is
38	hence
39	the
40	only
41	one
42	that
43	will
44	be
45	before
46	the
47	arbitrators
48	(
49	since
50	Duke
51	clearly
52	cannot
53	can
54	not
55	change
56	it's
57	ineffective
58	IP
59	at
60	this
61	stage
62	,
63	having
64	already
65	seen
66	ours
67	)
68	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	As	SCONJ	4	mark
2	I	PRON	4	nsubj
3	have	AUX	4	aux
4	told	VERB	8	advcl
5	RNR	NOUN	4	obj
6	,	PUNCT	8	punct
7	I	PRON	8	nsubj
8	think	VERB	0	root
9	we	PRON	11	nsubj
10	should	AUX	11	aux
11	advise	VERB	8	ccomp
12	Duke	PROPN	11	obj
13	in	ADP	14	case
14	writing	NOUN	11	obl
15	that	SCONJ	21	mark
16	its	PRON	17	nmod:poss
17	IP	NOUN	21	nsubj
18	is	AUX	21	cop
19	not	PART	21	advmod
20	in	ADP	21	case
21	conformity	NOUN	11	ccomp
22	with	ADP	24	case
23	the	DET	24	det
24	contract	NOUN	21	nmod
25	,	PUNCT	11	punct
26	since	SCONJ	31	mark
27	it	PRON	31	nsubj
28	is	AUX	31	cop
29	in	ADP	31	case
30	the	DET	31	det
31	alternative	NOUN	21	advcl
32	,	PUNCT	41	punct
33	and	CCONJ	41	cc
34	that	SCONJ	41	mark
35	our	PRON	36	nmod:poss
36	IP	NOUN	41	nsubj
37	is	AUX	41	cop
38	hence	ADV	41	advmod
39	the	DET	41	det
40	only	ADJ	41	amod
41	one	NOUN	21	conj
42	that	PRON	47	nsubj
43	will	AUX	47	aux
44	be	AUX	47	cop
45	before	ADP	47	case
46	the	DET	47	det
47	arbitrators	NOUN	41	acl:relcl
48	(	PUNCT	54	punct
49	since	SCONJ	54	mark
50	Duke	PROPN	54	nsubj
51	clearly	ADV	54	advmod
52	cannot	_	None	_
53	can	AUX	54	aux
54	not	PART	54	advmod
55	change	VERB	47	advcl
56	it's	PRON	57	nmod:poss
57	ineffective	ADJ	57	amod
58	IP	NOUN	54	obj
59	at	ADP	60	case
60	this	DET	60	det
61	stage	NOUN	54	obl
62	,	PUNCT	54	punct
63	having	AUX	64	aux
64	already	ADV	64	advmod
65	seen	VERB	54	advcl
66	ours	PRON	64	obj
67	)	PUNCT	54	punct
68	.	PUNCT	8	punct