As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Somehow, since she supposedly doesn't know any names of designers/dresses, after I told her the designer and dress name of the one I was comparing, she knew "exactly which dress" I was referring to and disagreed with my observation; she said that the bodice did come as low as the one I had on.
Postion	Tokenization
1	Somehow
2	,
3	since
4	she
5	supposedly
6	doesn't
7	does
8	n't
9	know
10	any
11	names
12	of
13	designers
14	/
15	dresses
16	,
17	after
18	I
19	told
20	her
21	the
22	designer
23	and
24	dress
25	name
26	of
27	the
28	one
29	I
30	was
31	comparing
32	,
33	she
34	knew
35	"
36	exactly
37	which
38	dress
39	"
40	I
41	was
42	referring
43	to
44	and
45	disagreed
46	with
47	my
48	observation
49	;
50	she
51	said
52	that
53	the
54	bodice
55	did
56	come
57	as
58	low
59	as
60	the
61	one
62	I
63	had
64	on
65	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Somehow	ADV	33	advmod
2	,	PUNCT	33	punct
3	since	SCONJ	8	mark
4	she	PRON	8	nsubj
5	supposedly	ADV	8	advmod
6	doesn't	_	None	_
7	does	AUX	8	aux
8	n't	PART	8	advmod
9	know	VERB	33	advcl
10	any	DET	10	det
11	names	NOUN	8	obj
12	of	ADP	12	case
13	designers	NOUN	10	nmod
14	/	PUNCT	14	cc
15	dresses	NOUN	12	conj
16	,	PUNCT	33	punct
17	after	SCONJ	18	mark
18	I	PRON	18	nsubj
19	told	VERB	33	advcl
20	her	PRON	18	iobj
21	the	DET	24	det
22	designer	NOUN	24	compound
23	and	CCONJ	23	cc
24	dress	NOUN	21	conj
25	name	NOUN	18	obj
26	of	ADP	27	case
27	the	DET	27	det
28	one	NOUN	24	nmod
29	I	PRON	30	nsubj
30	was	AUX	30	aux
31	comparing	VERB	27	acl:relcl
32	,	PUNCT	33	punct
33	she	PRON	33	nsubj
34	knew	VERB	0	root
35	"	PUNCT	37	punct
36	exactly	ADV	37	advmod
37	which	DET	37	det
38	dress	NOUN	41	obl
39	"	PUNCT	37	punct
40	I	PRON	41	nsubj
41	was	AUX	41	aux
42	referring	VERB	33	ccomp
43	to	ADP	37	case
44	and	CCONJ	44	cc
45	disagreed	VERB	33	conj
46	with	ADP	47	case
47	my	PRON	47	nmod:poss
48	observation	NOUN	44	obl
49	;	PUNCT	33	punct
50	she	PRON	50	nsubj
51	said	VERB	33	parataxis
52	that	SCONJ	55	mark
53	the	DET	53	det
54	bodice	NOUN	55	nsubj
55	did	AUX	55	aux
56	come	VERB	50	ccomp
57	as	ADV	57	advmod
58	low	ADV	55	advmod
59	as	ADP	60	case
60	the	DET	60	det
61	one	NOUN	57	obl
62	I	PRON	62	nsubj
63	had	VERB	60	acl:relcl
64	on	ADV	62	advmod
65	.	PUNCT	33	punct