As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
My concern is that between now and then Dunn, the AG have the time and resources to make a heckuvalot of mischief, which could be detrimental to generators/marketers' claims.
Postion	Tokenization
1	My
2	concern
3	is
4	that
5	between
6	now
7	and
8	then
9	Dunn
10	,
11	the
12	AG
13	have
14	the
15	time
16	and
17	resources
18	to
19	make
20	a
21	heckuvalot
22	of
23	mischief
24	,
25	which
26	could
27	be
28	detrimental
29	to
30	generators
31	/
32	marketers
33	'
34	claims
35	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	My	PRON	2	nmod:poss
2	concern	NOUN	3	nsubj
3	is	VERB	0	root
4	that	SCONJ	13	mark
5	between	ADP	6	case
6	now	ADV	13	obl
7	and	CCONJ	8	cc
8	then	ADV	6	conj
9	Dunn	PROPN	13	nsubj
10	,	PUNCT	9	punct
11	the	DET	12	det
12	AG	NOUN	9	appos
13	have	VERB	3	ccomp
14	the	DET	15	det
15	time	NOUN	13	obj
16	and	CCONJ	17	cc
17	resources	NOUN	15	conj
18	to	PART	19	mark
19	make	VERB	15	acl
20	a	DET	21	det
21	heckuvalot	NOUN	19	obj
22	of	ADP	23	case
23	mischief	NOUN	21	nmod
24	,	PUNCT	19	punct
25	which	PRON	28	nsubj
26	could	AUX	28	aux
27	be	AUX	28	cop
28	detrimental	ADJ	19	acl:relcl
29	to	ADP	34	case
30	generators	NOUN	34	nmod:poss
31	/	PUNCT	32	cc
32	marketers	NOUN	30	conj
33	'	PART	30	case
34	claims	NOUN	28	obl
35	.	PUNCT	3	punct