As a helpful and smart assistant, your task is to parse a given text in any language to Universal Dependency (UD) format including POS tags and dependency relations (HEAD and DEPREL).
Key Components of UD Annotation:
1. Tokens: The fundamental units within UD are tokens. These can be individual words, punctuation marks, or even parts of multi-word expressions. Each token has several associated attributes.
2. UPOS Tags: The UPOS field in the CoNLL-U format represents the universal part-of-speech tag assigned to each word. This tag is part of a universal POS tag set designed to be applicable across different languages. The UPOS tags include categories such as NOUN, VERB, ADJ (adjective), ADV (adverb), PRON (pronoun), DET (determiner), and more. 
3. Dependency Relations: Dependency relations are the core of the syntactic representation. They form a tree structure over the tokens in a sentence. Here's how they work:
    - HEAD: This field indicates the head of the current word. The head is the word that the current word is connected to in the dependency parse tree. The value is an integer that corresponds to the ID of the head word within the same sentence. A value of zero (0) indicates that the word is the root of the sentence.
    - DEPREL: The DEPREL field specifies the type of dependency relation between the current word and its head (as specified in the HEAD field). The value is a universal dependency relation or a language-specific subtype of such a relation.
Note: Blank lines are used to mark the boundaries between sentences.
Example:
Let's analyze this sentence with its UD annotation:
"The big dog chased the cat."
1. Tokenization:
- The
- big
- dog
- chased
- the
- cat
- .
2. UPOS Tags:
- The: DET
- big: ADJ
- dog: NOUN
- chased: VERB
- the: DET
- cat: NOUN
- .: PUNCT
3. Head node (parent):
- The: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- big: the parent of this word is "dog" at position 3
- dog: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- chased: this is the root node, therefore its head is 0
- the: the parent of this word is "cat" at position 6
- cat: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
- .: the parent of this word is "chased" at position 4
3. Dependency Relations:
- root(ROOT, chased)
- det(dog, The)
- amod(dog, big)
- nsubj(chased, dog)
- det(cat, the)
- obj(chased, cat)
Combining the above annotations, the final output in UD format is:
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	The	DET	3	det
2	big	ADJ	3	amod
3	dog	NOUN	4	nsubj
4	chased	VERB	0	ROOT
5	the	DET	6	det
6	cat	NOUN	4	obj
7	.	PUNCT	4	punct
Generate UD annotations for the following tokenized text:
Wolfowitz contradicted counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke when the latter spoke of the al-Qaeda threat, insisting that the preeminent threat of terrorism against the US came from Iraq, and indicating he accepted Laurie Mylroie's crackpot conspiracy theory that Saddam was behind the 1993 World Trade Towers bombing.
Postion	Tokenization
1	Wolfowitz
2	contradicted
3	counter-terrorism
4	czar
5	Richard
6	Clarke
7	when
8	the
9	latter
10	spoke
11	of
12	the
13	al
14	-
15	Qaeda
16	threat
17	,
18	insisting
19	that
20	the
21	preeminent
22	threat
23	of
24	terrorism
25	against
26	the
27	US
28	came
29	from
30	Iraq
31	,
32	and
33	indicating
34	he
35	accepted
36	Laurie
37	Mylroie's
38	Mylroie
39	's
40	crackpot
41	conspiracy
42	theory
43	that
44	Saddam
45	was
46	behind
47	the
48	1993
49	World
50	Trade
51	Towers
52	bombing
53	.
Position	Tokenization	UPOS	Head	Deprel
1	Wolfowitz	PROPN	2	nsubj
2	contradicted	VERB	0	root
3	counter-terrorism	NOUN	4	compound
4	czar	NOUN	5	compound
5	Richard	PROPN	2	obj
6	Clarke	PROPN	5	flat
7	when	SCONJ	10	mark
8	the	DET	9	det
9	latter	ADJ	10	nsubj
10	spoke	VERB	2	advcl
11	of	ADP	16	case
12	the	DET	16	det
13	al	PROPN	15	compound
14	-	PUNCT	15	punct
15	Qaeda	PROPN	16	compound
16	threat	NOUN	10	obl
17	,	PUNCT	2	punct
18	insisting	VERB	2	advcl
19	that	SCONJ	28	mark
20	the	DET	22	det
21	preeminent	ADJ	22	amod
22	threat	NOUN	28	nsubj
23	of	ADP	24	case
24	terrorism	NOUN	22	nmod
25	against	ADP	27	case
26	the	DET	27	det
27	US	PROPN	24	nmod
28	came	VERB	18	ccomp
29	from	ADP	30	case
30	Iraq	PROPN	28	obl
31	,	PUNCT	33	punct
32	and	CCONJ	33	cc
33	indicating	VERB	18	conj
34	he	PRON	35	nsubj
35	accepted	VERB	33	ccomp
36	Laurie	PROPN	41	nmod:poss
37	Mylroie's	_	None	_
38	Mylroie	PROPN	36	flat
39	's	PART	36	case
40	crackpot	NOUN	41	compound
41	conspiracy	NOUN	41	compound
42	theory	NOUN	35	obj
43	that	SCONJ	51	mark
44	Saddam	PROPN	51	nsubj
45	was	AUX	51	cop
46	behind	ADP	51	case
47	the	DET	51	det
48	1993	NUM	51	nummod
49	World	PROPN	49	compound
50	Trade	PROPN	50	compound
51	Towers	PROPN	51	compound
52	bombing	NOUN	41	acl
53	.	PUNCT	2	punct