This paper proposes a general system for compute-intensive graph mining tasks that find from a big graph all subgraphs that satisfy certain requirements (e.g., graph matching and community detection). Due to the broad range of applications of such tasks, many single-threaded algorithms have been proposed. However, graphs such as online social networks and knowledge graphs often have billions of vertices and edges, which require distributed processing in order to scale. Unfortunately, existing distributed graph processing systems such as Pregel and GraphLab are designed for data-intensive analytics, and are inefficient for compute-intensive graph mining tasks since computation over any data is coupled with the data's access that involves network transmission. We propose a distributed graph mining framework, called G-thinker, which is designed for compute-intensive graph mining workloads. G-thinker provides an intuitive graph-exploration API for the convenient implementation of various graph mining algorithms, and the runtime engine provides efficient execution with bounded memory consumption, light network communication, and parallelism between computation and communication. Extensive experiments were conducted, which demonstrate that G-thinker is orders of magnitude faster than existing solution, and can scale to graphs that are two orders of magnitude larger given the same hardware resources.
NScale @cite_32 uses the MapReduce solution we mentioned above, and it brings additional overheads. NScale only supports the top-level decomposed subgraphs, and there is no mechanism to balance workload through recursive decomposition. Assuming that each @math spans the @math -hop neighborhood around @math , then NScale first constructs all decomposed subgraphs using @math rounds of MapReduce. The large number of decomposed subgraphs are then packed into larger compact subgraphs, each of which can fit in the memory of a reducer. Vertices common to multiple decomposed subgraphs are stored only once in their packed subgraph. Finally, each compact subgraph is distributed to a reducer, which processes all decomposed subgraphs packed in the compact subgraph in memory. Obviously, NScale suffers from all the performance issues of a MapReduce-based vertex-centric solution; moreover, NScale further packs decomposed subgraphs through expensive disk-based computation, and it is very likely that the cost of packing @math already surpasses that of processing @math right after it is constructed in memory.
@cite_32
2146838049
There is an increasing interest in executing complex analyses over large graphs, many of which require processing a large number of multi-hop neighborhoods or subgraphs. Examples include ego network analysis, motif counting, finding social circles, personalized recommendations, link prediction, anomaly detection, analyzing influence cascades, and others. These tasks are not well served by existing vertex-centric graph processing frameworks, where user programs are only able to directly access the state of a single vertex at a time, resulting in high communication, scheduling, and memory overheads in executing such tasks. Further, most existing graph processing frameworks ignore the challenges in extracting the relevant portions of the graph that an analysis task is interested in, and loading those onto distributed memory. This paper introduces NScale, a novel end-to-end graph processing framework that enables the distributed execution of complex subgraph-centric analytics over large-scale graphs in the cloud. NScale enables users to write programs at the level of subgraphs rather than at the level of vertices. Unlike most previous graph processing frameworks, which apply the user program to the entire graph, NScale allows users to declaratively specify subgraphs of interest. Our framework includes a novel graph extraction and packing (GEP) module that utilizes a cost-based optimizer to partition and pack the subgraphs of interest into memory on as few machines as possible. The distributed execution engine then takes over and runs the user program in parallel on those subgraphs, restricting the scope of the execution appropriately, and utilizes novel techniques to minimize memory consumption by exploiting overlaps among the subgraphs. We present a comprehensive empirical evaluation comparing against three state-of-the-art systems, namely Giraph, GraphLab, and GraphX, on several real-world datasets and a variety of analysis tasks. Our experimental results show orders-of-magnitude improvements in performance and drastic reductions in the cost of analytics compared to vertex-centric approaches.