In his address to the nation almost two weeks ago, President Obama promised to use force against the armies of Islamic State "wherever they are," and he specifically mentioned Syria. But Monday night's airstrikes in that country came sooner and with more force than expected, targeting not only Islamic State but also the Khorasan Group, an Al Qaeda offshoot thought to be plotting attacks on Americans. 
 
 This major offensive raises questions about whether the United States (and a few Arab allies) are planning a prolonged air campaign in a country whose leadership did not invite intervention. Coupled with his successful lobbying of Congress to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to train supposedly moderate Syrian rebels, the airstrikes mark a major reversal for Obama. 
 
 Until recently he has assiduously resisted American entanglement in Syria's civil war, and for good reason. The conflict pits President Bashar Assad, a secular dictator with innocent blood on his hands, against an assortment of opponents whose division into moderate and extremist factions isn't nearly so neat or stable as some advocates of U.S. intervention suppose. 
 
 Obama changed his mind about intervention in Syria for the same reason he decided to launch airstrikes in Iraq and augment the U.S. military presence in that country: a sickeningly swift sequence of events in which Islamic State fighters routed Iraqi forces, terrorized Christians and other minorities and seemed poised to attack Baghdad. Obama also was influenced, understandably, by the horrific beheadings of two American journalists. 
 
 The result was his promise of a long-term campaign to "degrade and ultimately destroy" Islamic State. Obama said that wouldn't require U.S. combat forces. But if the threat posed by Islamic State justifies a rethinking of Obama's aversion to intervention in Syria, might it not also incline him to change his view about "no boots on the ground"? Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has said that if necessary he would recommend that U.S. military "advisors" accompany Iraqi troops into battle. 
 
 The airstrikes mark a major reversal for Obama. 
 
 We find that prospect troubling. Islamic State is a heinous group, a threat to U.S. interests (though not, as far as we know, to the U.S. homeland) and a threat to the rights of those in the Middle East whom it despises as infidels. But is the threat serious enough to justify an ever-escalating role for the U.S. military in Syria and Iraq? Does the U.S. have a clear strategy and achievable aims? The case has yet to be made. 
 
 Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion ||||| Story highlights Strategy has "things that one doesn't think of normally in context of war," he says 
 
 He says President Obama's strategy to quash ISIS with the help of allies will succeed 
 
 "Doing it with allies and partners isn't just smart, it's strong," Kerry says of Obama's plan 
 
 After talks in Jeddah with Persian Gulf leaders, he will go to Paris for an Iraq conference 
 
 U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Thursday would not say the United States is at war with ISIS, telling CNN in an interview that the administration's strategy includes "many different things that one doesn't think of normally in context of war." 
 
 "What we are doing is engaging in a very significant counterterrorism operation," Kerry told CNN's Elise Labott in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. "It's going to go on for some period of time. If somebody wants to think about it as being a war with ISIL, they can do so, but the fact is it's a major counterterrorism operation that will have many different moving parts." 
 
 Kerry made a distinction between ISIS and terror groups operating in Somalia and Yemen. 
 
 "ISIL is an animal unto itself," he said. "And it is significantly such a threat because of the foreign fighters that are attracted to it -- which you don't see in Somalia or ... Yemen." Most importantly, Kerry said, ISIL has attracted a "significant coalition" that is determined to go and destroy it. 
 
 Kerry, in Jeddah for meetings with Arab leaders to enlist regional support for a coalition to defeat ISIS , defended the administration's insistence that the 2001 authority to go after al Qaeda and affiliates applies to ISIS. He insisted that, despite the split between jihadist groups, the origin of ISIS as an al Qaeda affiliate is enough to consider them connected. 
 
 JUST WATCHED White House: Targets identified in Syria Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH White House: Targets identified in Syria 02:12 
 
 JUST WATCHED Kerry: U.S. will help fight 'evil' ISIS Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Kerry: U.S. will help fight 'evil' ISIS 01:47 
 
 JUST WATCHED Obama: 475 more service members to Iraq Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Obama: 475 more service members to Iraq 02:13 
 
 Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Obama lays out ISIS strategy – President Barack Obama delivers a prime-time address from the White House in Washington on Wednesday, September 10. He vowed to target the group now calling itself the Islamic State with airstrikes "wherever they exist." Hide Caption 1 of 5 Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Obama lays out ISIS strategy – Obama pledged to lead a broad coalition to fight ISIS and work with "partner forces" on the ground in Syria and Iraq. Hide Caption 2 of 5 Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Obama lays out ISIS strategy – Obama said the United States will meet ISIS "with strength and resolve." Hide Caption 3 of 5 Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Obama lays out ISIS strategy – Obama shared new proposals on how to fight and destroy the militant group ISIS. Hide Caption 4 of 5 Photos: Obama lays out ISIS strategy Obama lays out ISIS strategy – Obama turns away from the lectern after delivering his address to the nation. Hide Caption 5 of 5 
 
 "This group is and has been al Qaeda," Kerry said. "By trying to change its name, it doesn't change who it is, what it does." 
 
 Asked how much of the interpretation lets Congress get away from a vote on going after ISIS -- a scenario lawmakers would like to avoid in an election year -- Kerry responded "none." 
 
 Kerry said the opposition battling the regime of President Bashar al-Assad in Syria has been outgunned and outmanned, but the administration believes that equation can change "if they receive proper training, if there are recruits that come in, and if it grows over a period of time." 
 
 The regime's legitimacy could never be restored, Kerry said. 
 
 "It is going to be our policy to separate (al-Assad), who is mostly in the western part of Syria, in a certain corridor from the eastern part of Syria, which he doesn't control," Kerry said. "ISIL controls that part. So it is clearly ... not a very difficult task to target ISIL." 
 
 The talks in Jeddah come a day after U.S. President Barack Obama outlined a plan to "dismantle and ultimately destroy" the Sunni extremist group that has seized a swath of territory across Iraq and Syria. 
 
 Videotaped beheadings, including two murders of American journalists, have led to the push for a broader counterterrorism mission, including possible airstrikes in civil war-torn Syria. But the United States has ruled out sending American troops for a ground offensive. 
 
 On Thursday, Kerry met with Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal in Jeddah before wider talks with other regional leaders. 
 
 Asked whether Saudi Arabia supports the extremist expressions of the Wahhabism version of Islam espoused by some terror groups, Kerry told CNN that the nation is "deeply committed to the effort to terminate ISIL." 
 
 "They have never funded the kind of effort you're talking about with respect to ISIL," Kerry said, adding that a significant part of the counterterrorism effort will include stemming fundraising for terror groups. 
 
 After Saudi Arabia, Kerry will visit Turkey and Egypt for meetings with senior officials, state department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. 
 
 In a statement after Obama's prime-time speech Wednesday, Kerry said the President's strategy would succeed "because doing it with allies and partners isn't just smart, it's strong." 
 
 Kerry said his travels through the Middle East and Europe over the coming days were an effort to "meet a unifying threat with a unified response." 
 
 While American leadership is "indispensable," he said, "we cannot destroy this group on our own. Defeating this common enemy calls for a common cause, and we're taking it on to succeed together." 
 
 Obama spoke Wednesday with Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah, a senior administration official told journalists. "The Saudis made very clear that they support this mission, they will join us in this mission," the official said. 
 
 The backing of Sunni-dominated nations such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Turkey will lend support to any campaign to contain the spread of ISIS. 
 
 Turkey's capacity or willingness to act may be limited by the fact that ISIS continues to hold 47 Turkish hostages seized from the northern Iraqi city of Mosul. 
 
 So far, Shiite-majority Iran has played the biggest role on the ground in northern Iraq, where its militias have been helping Iraqi forces. 
 
 ISIS, which now calls itself the "Islamic State," has said it is bent on creating an Islamic "caliphate" in Iraq and Syria where harsh Sharia law governs every aspect of life. 
 
 JUST WATCHED Obama: 'We will degrade & destroy ISIS' Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Obama: 'We will degrade & destroy ISIS' 02:18 
 
 JUST WATCHED President Obama: 'ISIL is not Islamic' Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH President Obama: 'ISIL is not Islamic' 01:50 
 
 JUST WATCHED Obama: No U.S. ground troops vs. ISIS Replay More Videos ... MUST WATCH Obama: No U.S. ground troops vs. ISIS 01:31 
 
 Iraqi leader: 'Everybody's on board' 
 
 Baghdad was the first stop on Kerry's tour, where he met with Iraq's new Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi. 
 
 In a joint news conference with Kerry on Wednesday, al-Abadi said the international community had a responsibility to help defend Iraqis from the threat posed by ISIS. 
 
 He also said Iraqis had worked hard recently to form an inclusive government where "everybody's on board" to fight the militants. 
 
 In a separate news conference, Kerry said the U.S. was already coordinating with some 40 other nations to provide humanitarian, military and other assistance to Iraqis to fight ISIS. 
 
 The United States has so far launched more than 150 airstrikes to weaken the militants in Iraq, Kerry said. 
 
 Syria airstrikes 
 
 Obama said Wednesday that 475 more U.S. military advisers will head to Iraq, raising the total of American forces there to 1,700 for a mission originally described as limited. 
 
 He also shifted $25 million in military aid to Iraqi forces, including Kurdish fighters in the north combating the ISIS extremists. The aid could include ammunition, small arms and vehicles, as well as military education and training, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said. 
 
 It's not clear how soon U.S. forces will launch operations in Syria. 
 
 Senior administration officials who briefed reporters before Obama's speech on condition of not being identified said airstrikes against ISIS targets in Syria would occur "at a time and place of our choosing." 
 
 "We're not going to telegraph our punches by being specific about the time and nature of the targets," one official said, adding that "we will do that as necessary as we develop targets." 
 
 'Very difficult, long road' 
 
 Kerry met with Jordan's King Abdullah II in Jordan before leaving Thursday morning for the Saudi seaside city of Jeddah, where he was scheduled to meet with the leaders of half a dozen Persian Gulf states. 
 
 In addition to support for a military campaign against ISIS, administration officials said the United States would be looking to its Gulf allies to crack down on ISIS funding and stop the flow of foreign fighters, both seen as the lifeblood of the jihadist group. 
 
 The United States also wants Sunni Arab states, particularly Saudi Arabia, to counter ISIS by helping to persuade other Sunnis to eschew its ideology. 
 
 "It's going to be a very difficult, long road to get there, but it's something that the region and our partners in the Gulf can play a really important role in," a senior State Department official traveling with Kerry said. 
 
 "And there's a number of different ways that they can do that, both in terms of just their relationships, in terms of their encouragement, in terms of their financial contributions, in terms of lifting the burden that the government here has." 
 
 After Saudi Arabia, Kerry will travel to Paris to attend an international conference on Iraq, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said. 
 
 Obama will chair a meeting later this month at the U.N. General Assembly, where the global strategy is expected to be hammered out. ||||| (CNN) -- The United States and several Arab nations carried out airstrikes against ISIS in Syria early Tuesday, intensifying the campaign against the Islamic militant group. 
 
 Tomahawk missiles launched from the sea began the strikes against the Sunni Muslim extremists, followed by bombers and fighters. 
 
 Here are answers to key questions about the new phase in the conflict with ISIS: 
 
 Which areas were hit? 
 
 The bombing has focused on the ISIS stronghold of Raqqa, a city in northern Syria. ISIS has had control of Raqqa for more than a year, imposing its brutal interpretation of Islamic law on the city's residents. 
 
 The extremists have made the city, which sits on the banks of the Euphrates River, the de facto capital of their self-declared "Islamic State" that stretches across large areas of Syria and Iraq. 
 
 ISIS targets around other Syrian cities -- Deir Ezzor, Al Hasakah and Abu Kamal -- were also hit in the strikes. 
 
 What is the Khorasan Group? 
 
 What was struck? 
 
 The attacks damaged multiple ISIS targets, the U.S. military said, including training compounds, headquarters, storage facilities, supply trucks and armed vehicles. 
 
 "Usually the first part of any air campaign are strategic targets -- fixed locations, big buildings, things that you don't need a guy on the ground to laser-designate," said retired Lt. Col. Rick Francona, an Air Force veteran intelligence officer and CNN military analyst. 
 
 The Pentagon also said ISIS fighters were hit in the strikes but didn't specify how many. 
 
 In Raqqa, a building in the governor's compound, a post office and a recruitment center were among the sites struck, activists reported. 
 
 Maps: Arab nations join U.S., expand fight against terror to Syria 
 
 Why is Raqqa a focus of the initial strikes? 
 
 The city is known as a place where ISIS houses training centers, weapons depots and accommodations for fighters. During the Syrian conflict, the group has also seized military bases from the Syrian regime near the city and in the wider Raqqa province. 
 
 The targets hit by the airstrikes are intended to hurt ISIS' ability to command and control, resupply and train, a senior U.S. military official told CNN's Jim Sciutto. 
 
 ISIS has made Raqqa the flagship for its model of governance, providing food, fuel and security to people struggling to survive after years of civil war. But it also imposed hardline Islamist law there and metes out harsh punishment to those who don't follow orders. Locals started calling the city Tora Bora last year, saying it felt as if the Taliban of Afghanistan had taken over. 
 
 Who is taking part in the airstrikes? 
 
 All the foreign partners participating in the strikes with the United States are Arab countries: Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Jordan, Bahrain and Qatar. 
 
 "It's a remarkable diplomatic achievement," said CNN Political Commentator Peter Beinhart. "I don't think it was expected that there would be this much Arab support." 
 
 How long will the attacks go on? 
 
 For a while. 
 
 The first wave of strikes was expected to last into the early hours of Tuesday morning in Syria, CNN's Sciutto reported. 
 
 It is aimed at striking a strong initial blow, a senior U.S. official told CNN. The aerial campaign on ISIS targets in Syria is expected to continue beyond Tuesday. 
 
 Counterterrorism expert Philip Mudd said Tuesday's attacks were "just the start." 
 
 "This is not a definitive blow," said Mudd, who previously worked for the CIA. "When this gets interesting to me as a former practitioner is six months down the road, when a second-tier ISIS commander starts to create some sort of cell to recruit foreigners from Europe or the United States or Canada into Syria, do we still have the will and capability, and the intelligence, to locate that person, or that group of people, and put lead on the target?" 
 
 What happens next? 
 
 U.S. military officials will be trying to assess the effectiveness of the first night of bombing. 
 
 Some analysts have suggested that ISIS had already started dispersing its assets and fighters after President Barack Obama's warning of action in Syria earlier this month. 
 
 The response of ISIS fighters to the initial strikes may give military officials clues on what to target next. 
 
 "The follow-up to some of these strikes is -- what are their actions now?" said retired Lt. Gen. Mark Hertling, a CNN military analyst. "There is intelligence that flows from the initial strike," he said. 
 
 The Arab governments involved in the strikes could also face discontent among their own people. 
 
 "Parts of the population do not agree with Sunni going against Sunni," Hertling said. 
 
 The United States is also pushing for a binding resolution at the U.N. General Assembly this week that aims to prevent and track the travel of foreign fighters to Syria. 
 
 How has ISIS reacted? 
 
 There was no immediate confirmed comment from the militant group on the strikes. 
 
 ISIS' official Bayan Radio tweeted a photo that it claimed showed damage to a communications tower in Raqqa. CNN wasn't immediately able to independently verify the image. 
 
 The militant group has increased security patrols in Raqqa, an opposition activist told CNN. 
 
 ISIS has previously linked the U.S. campaign of airstrikes in Iraq to its decision to execute three of its Western hostages -- two Americans and one Briton. It also recently called for attacks against the United States and its allies. 
 
 How have Syrian opposition groups reacted? 
 
 Hadi al Bahra, the President of the Syrian Opposition Coalition, welcomed the strikes. 
 
 "Tonight, the international community has joined our fight against ISIS in Syria," he said in a statement. "We have called for airstrikes such as those that commenced tonight with a heavy heart and deep concern, as these strikes begin in our own homeland. We insist that utmost care is taken to avoid civilian casualties." 
 
 Did the U.S. consult with the Syrian government beforehand? 
 
 The regime of President Bashar al-Assad said it was given a heads-up about the attacks through its ambassador to the United Nations in New York. 
 
 A senior U.S. State Department official confirmed that the U.S. notified the Syrian regime of the planned action, but the official said that the Obama administration didn't seek the regime's permission or coordinate with it. 
 
 Finding the 'right' Syrian rebels 
 
 Beinhart said al-Assad's government may end up as "the real winner" from the airstrikes on ISIS, since the moderate U.S.-backed rebels aren't "in a position to take this territory that we are pulverizing from the air." 
 
 Did Obama have the authority to begin the attacks? 
 
 The White House argues it doesn't need any new authority; that it's using an existing authorization to combat al Qaeda to expand its airstrike campaign. 
 
 But some lawmakers say it's Congress' role, not the President's, to declare war. 
 
 They say they were open to holding a vote on military action against ISIS -- but not until after the midterm elections in November. 
 
 "It was one thing to attack in Iraq, where you had a government that wanted us to," Beinhart said. "But Congress did not vote for U.S. airstrikes in Syria and we don't have a government requesting us to do that." 
 
 What are U.S. lawmakers saying? 
 
 When the strikes began, Congress had already left town to campaign for the midterm elections, and most of the reaction came from those who had pressed the administration to act sooner. Privately, many of them conceded they were relieved not to have to take a vote on a controversial issue just weeks before voters went to the polls in November. 
 
 CNN's Lorenzo Ferrigno contributed to this report.
– The New York Times editorial board thinks President Obama has the US blundering into a new war with the expanded airstrikes in Syria. Before the US gets any deeper into the operation, the president should open this up for a full debate in Congress, says the editorial. It's also "puzzling" that in preparing the nation on Sept. 10 for these airstrikes, Obama said nothing about the Khorasan group that is suddenly Public Enemy No. 1. "There isn’t a full picture—because Mr. Obama has not provided one—of how this bombing campaign will degrade the extremist groups without unleashing unforeseen consequences in a violent and volatile region," says the editorial. "In the absence of public understanding or discussion and a coherent plan, the strikes in Syria were a bad decision." Agree: The airstrikes are a "major reversal" for a president who opposed intervention in Syria for so long, writes the Los Angeles Times in an editorial. Can we trust that he won't reverse himself on ground troops, too? Yes, ISIS and the Khorasan group pose threats to US interests, "but is the threat serious enough to justify an ever-escalating role for the US military in Syria and Iraq?" asks the editorial. "Does the US have a clear strategy and achievable aims? The case has yet to be made." Disagree: The Wall Street Journal editorial board not only applauds the airstrikes but thinks US ground troops should be ready to move quickly. If the mission is to succeed, and it must, they'll be needed to direct airstrikes as militants hide in populated areas. "No US President should ever start a war he doesn't intend to win, and wars rarely go as smoothly as advertised in advance," concludes the editorial. "Now that he has attacked ISIS, Mr. Obama must show that America is the strong horse."