In an age when big-ticket trials are a rarity, plaintiffs lawyers and Big Tobacco continue to battle ferociously in courts across the Sunshine State. 
 
 More than 7,000 lawsuits claiming injuries and death due to smoking are pending in state and federal courts in Florida, the legacy of the state Supreme Court’s 2006 “Engle” ruling, which required jurors in future smoking cases to be bound by certain factual findings, including that tobacco companies sold cigarettes that were “defective” and “unreasonably dangerous.” (Here’s a previous LB post on the litigation.) 
 
 The supreme court ruling has given smoking plaintiffs in Florida a huge leg up; they have so far amassed more than $250 million in damages in so-called Engle progeny cases. 
 
 The latest news comes out of Bronson, Florida (pop. 1,049), where a jury yesterday awarded $80 million — $72M of which was in punitive damages — to the daughter of James Cayce Horner, a two-pack a day smoker who died in 1996 of lung cancer. 
 
 The jury found that Horner was was 10% responsible for his death and that the defendant, R.J. Reynolds, was 90% at fault. 
 
 “People need to be reminded, again and again, of the true cost—in precious human life—that R.J. Reynolds has imposed and continues to impose on our society,” plaintiffs’ counsel David Sales said in a statement. 
 
 An attorney for R.J. Reynolds declined to comment. 
 
 The Horner verdict reverses a recent winning streak for the tobacco industry. They had won defense verdicts in eight straight Engle cases, the most recent on Friday, when a Miami jury decided in favor of Philip Morris USA in a smoking trial. ||||| After a review of the stunning verdict in March in Hulk Hogan's lawsuit against Gawker over the publishing of an excerpt of a sex tape, Florida Circuit Judge Pamela Campbell on Wednesday decided not to order a new trial nor touch the $140 million verdict. 
 
 The decision comes as the case has gained renewed attention thanks to a report that PayPal co-founder and early Facebook investor Peter Thiel provided financial backing to Hogan as the former professional wrestler pursued claims of having his privacy violated and his publicity rights infringed through an October 2012 post viewed by an estimated 7 million people. Campbell's decision will soon allow this dispute to proceed to a Florida appeals court. 
 
 Hogan — whose real name is Terry Bollea — pursued Gawker for showing him in sexual intercourse with Heather Cole, the then-wife of his best friend, Tampa-area radio shock jock Bubba the Love Sponge. The existence of the sex tape was reported by TMZ and The Dirty by the time that Gawker had published it alongside an A.J. Daulerio essay about celebrity sex tapes. Gawker attempted to argue that it was within its First Amendment right to decide what was newsworthy, but after a two-week trial that ended in May, a jury decided that Hogan's privacy outweighed this. The jury handed down $115 million in compensatory damages and $25 million more in punitive damages. 
 
 At the hearing Wednesday, Gawker's attorney Seth Berlin urged a remittitur (a reducing or throwing out a jury verdict) and compared the jury's damages determination to awards against tobacco companies in trials over smoking deaths. He commented that it would be "one of the largest in Florida's history and grossly excessive compared to the conduct at issue." 
 
 In response, Hogan's attorney Shane Vogt argued that Gawker was stopped from making these arguments and said there's no evidence that the jury acted with passion or prejudice. He said the $25 million punitive damages verdict was "low," but also "proof" that the jury followed the judge's instruction not to bankrupt Gawker. He also said this "is a first-impression case. You can throw all those other cases out the window." 
 
 Explaining further, Vogt said, "For the first time, the jury has put a value on privacy. This is not like the tobacco cases. We live in a world where privacy is much more important. Everyone has a cellphone camera. There are drones out there." 
 
 Now that the judge has determined what Gawker must pay, the case moves to the appellate stage where the Nick Denton-owned company is set to rally behind free speech and free press under the First Amendment plus further argue that it didn't get a fair trial thanks to Campbell's jury instructions and evidence that the judge precluded from being heard. Hogan's battle with Gawker has certainly sent a loud message, but the lessons being drawn from this case are still being shaped. 
 
 As for Thiel, Gawker asked the judge for the opportunity to conduct discovery about who is funding Hogan. 
 
 "In last 24 hours hours, news reports have come out about Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel," said Berlin. "We believe this potentially relates to our efforts to get relief. We would like a limited amount of leave to get to the bottom of it." 
 
 Judge Campbell shrugged off the news reports, not ruling definitively until Gawker formally brings a motion, but seeming to not pay it much heed. “I don’t like looking at all the stuff that’s published out there," she said. "It’s not healthy." 
 
 Vogt responded that litigation funding "happens all the time" and is governed by the Florida code of ethics for attorneys. He added, "Whatever they file, knowing what I know about litigation funding, we are going to look at this with an eye towards sanctions." 
 
 Before an appeal formally gets filed, a judge still needs to decide whether Gawker needs to post a $50 million bond to stay the judgment pending the appeal and whether Hogan can in the meantime conduct his own discovery about Gawker's finances to advance his collection efforts. There's also a pending Gawker motion arguing for dismissal on the basis of fraud upon the court. The next hearing is scheduled for June 10. ||||| (Reuters) - Johnson & Johnson (JNJ.N) suffered its first trial loss in a lawsuit claiming its talc-based products including Johnson’s Baby Powder contain cancer-causing asbestos, with a New Jersey jury on Thursday ordering J&J; and another company to pay $37 million in damages. 
 
 FILE PHOTO: A Johnson & Johnson building is shown in Irvine, California, U.S., January 24, 2017. REUTERS/Mike Blake/File Photo 
 
 The verdict of liability in Middlesex County Superior Court in New Brunswick came as J&J; fights thousands of cases claiming its talc products can also cause ovarian cancer. The jury found J&J; and another company liable after more than two months of trial. 
 
 The lawsuit was brought by New Jersey resident Stephen Lanzo, who said he developed mesothelioma after inhaling dust that was generated through his regular use of J&J; talc powder products since his birth in 1972. 
 
 Mesothelioma is a deadly form of cancer closely associated with exposure to asbestos. It affects the delicate tissue that lines body cavities, most often around the lungs, but also in the abdomen and elsewhere. 
 
 The jury awarded Lanzo $30 million and his wife $7 million in compensatory damages. It found J&J; was responsible for 70 percent of the damages and said a unit of France-based Imerys SA (IMTP.PA), its talc supplier, was responsible for 30 percent. 
 
 The jury will return on Tuesday for further proceedings to determine whether to award punitive damages, according to an online broadcast of the trial by Courtroom View Network. 
 
 J&J; denied the allegations and says Johnson’s Baby Powder does not contain asbestos or cause cancer. 
 
 J&J; in a statement said it was disappointed but would withhold further comment until the trial’s completion. Gwen Myers, an Imerys spokeswoman, said Imerys plans to appeal and is confident talc did not cause Lanzo’s cancer. 
 
 The Lanzos did not respond to requests for comment. 
 
 J&J;, based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, faces talc-related lawsuits by 6,610 plaintiffs nationally, largely based on claims it failed to warn women about the risk of developing ovarian cancer by using its products for feminine hygiene. 
 
 In five trials in Missouri involving ovarian cancer lawsuits, juries found J&J; liable four times and awarded the plaintiffs a total of $307 million. In California, a jury awarded a now-deceased woman $417 million. 
 
 But in October, a Missouri appellate court threw out the first verdict there for $72 million and a California judge tossed the $417 million verdict. J&J; is seeking to reverse the other verdicts. 
 
 Asbestos claims are a more recent challenge for J&J.; It won the only other asbestos-related trial in November when a Los Angeles Superior Court jury ruled in its favor. 
 
 (This story corrects headline to show case was J&J;’s first trial loss in an asbestos-related case involving talc, not first loss in talc cancer lawsuit. Corrects paragraph 1 to say both J&J; and another company have been ordered to pay $37 mln, not just J&J;)
– The daughter of a man who died of lung cancer after smoking for 60 years has been awarded $80 million by a Florida jury. The jury decided that tobacco giant RJ Reynolds was 90% responsible for the man's death at the age of 76, and ordered the company to pay $8 million in compensatory damages and $72 million in punitive damages, BusinessWeek reports. The woman's lawyer expects the appeals process to last up to 3 years if the company appeals to Florida's Supreme Court, which he fully expects it to do. "Tobacco always appeals," he said. More than 7,000 smoking-related lawsuits are pending in Florida, and the verdict against RJ Reynolds marks the end of an 8-case winning streak for the tobacco industry, the Wall Street Journal notes.