Moreover, the tight export quotas have caused world prices to soar, even while holding steady in China. 
 
 Photo 
 
 Officials in two departments of China’s General Administration of Customs in Beijing declined to comment on Thursday evening about the status of rare earth exports. The commerce ministry, which handles trade policy, also had no immediate comment. 
 
 Although deposits of rare earths are found in various parts of the world, including the United States, China produces about 95 percent of the global supply of the minerals. That is largely because rare earth mining and processing can be so environmentally risky, creating toxic and even radioactive wastes, that other countries have tended to avoid or abandon production. Only recently have other nations begun scrambling to develop or expand their own mining capabilities. 
 
 The Chinese shipments resumed Thursday morning only hours before Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton raised the embargo issue at a news conference in Honolulu, where she announced plans to visit China on Saturday to pursue the matter with Chinese officials. 
 
 Mrs. Clinton spoke after meeting with Japan’s foreign minister, Seiji Maehara, and said that the suspension of shipments had been a “wake-up call” and that both countries would have to find alternative sources of rare earth materials. 
 
 Because China is on the opposite side of the international dateline from Honolulu, it was already midday on Thursday in China by the time Mrs. Clinton spoke in Honolulu on Wednesday. Later, after the New York Times Web site reported that the embargo had been lifted, an administration official said the United States was still seeking clarification from China. 
 
 In recent weeks, senior Chinese commerce ministry officials have insisted that they had not issued any regulations halting shipments. They have suggested at various times — implausibly, in the view of industry executives — that the halt resulted from a spontaneous and simultaneous decision by the country’s 32 authorized rare earth exporters not to make shipments, whether because of a deterioration in Sino-Japanese relations or a greater thoroughness on the part of customs inspectors. 
 
 Photo 
 
 Under this year’s quota — 30,300 metric tons of authorized shipments — only a few thousand metric tons remain to be exported in 2010. Meanwhile, annual demand outside China for raw rare earths approaches 50,000 tons, according to industry estimates. 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 The Chinese government assigns its quotas to the authorized exporters, who often trade those rights like commodities. As recently as 2008, the quota rights themselves had no market value. But lately, with rising demand, the value of the remaining quotas has soared to the point that the right to export a single ton of rare earths from China now sells for about $40,000, including special Chinese taxes . 
 
 That is a sizable, additional cost for buyers of neodymium, a rare earth used to make lightweight, powerful magnets essential to technologies including giant wind turbines , gasoline- electric cars and Apple iPhones. 
 
 Newsletter Sign Up Continue reading the main story Please verify you're not a robot by clicking the box. Invalid email address. Please re-enter. You must select a newsletter to subscribe to. Sign Up You will receive emails containing news content , updates and promotions from The New York Times. You may opt-out at any time. You agree to receive occasional updates and special offers for The New York Times's products and services. Thank you for subscribing. An error has occurred. Please try again later. View all New York Times newsletters. 
 
 Neodymium sells for about $40,000 a metric ton in China, having recovered from a nose-dive during the global economic crisis. But it sells for twice that much outside the country because of the export restrictions, according to data from Metal Pages, a database service in London . 
 
 The cost of quotas has become exorbitant for users of lanthanum, which is vital for the catalytic converters that clean the exhaust of conventional, gasoline-powered cars. It is mostly produced here in Baotou, a smoggy mining and steel city in China’s Inner Mongolia that is the capital of China’s rare earth industry. Lanthanum sells for less than $4,500 a ton in China, but up to 10 times that much outside China because of the export restrictions. 
 
 Such price differences have created a big incentive for companies to move factories to China, and many already have. 
 
 Photo 
 
 China’s shipping embargo has caused much more distress in Japan than in the United States or Europe, and not just because Japan’s shipments were cut off much earlier. It is because Japan tends to be affected more than other industrial nations by the way China sets its rare earth export quotas. 
 
 China’s quotas — and the shipping embargo — have involved only shipments in which the material has a rare earth content of about 50 percent or more. High-technology materials made from rare earths, like special magnetic powders for the clean energy and electronics industries, or polishing powders for the glass industry, are not subject to quotas and are inexpensively available. 
 
 Because the United States and Europe mainly buy highly processed rare earth powders from China, the customs policy of blocking shipments of raw rare earths had a limited, mostly symbolic effect. Japan, in contrast, is the biggest importer of raw rare earths and tends to process them into industrial materials. So Japan is more dependent on the materials affected by China’s tightening quotas. 
 
 Advertisement Continue reading the main story 
 
 It was on Oct. 18 that the Chinese government broadened its halt in raw rare earths to include the United States and Europe. That step enabled customs officials to take the position that they were checking all rare earth shipments closely and were not singling out Japan. 
 
 The move also occurred only hours after Zhang Guobao, the country’s top energy official, summoned foreign reporters in Beijing. There, he delivered a blistering denunciation of the Obama administration’s decision the previous Friday to begin investigating whether China’s clean energy policies violated the World Trade Organization ’s free trade rules. But the exact interaction between American policy decisions and Chinese customs enforcement actions is unclear. 
 
 For China, the embargo on rare earth shipments has provided at least some geopolitical leverage. The halt was one of a series of measures that China took after Japan detained the captain of a Chinese fishing trawler that collided with two Japanese patrol boats; Japan later released the trawler’s captain. 
 
 Japanese companies had been able to weather the embargo without any significant factory shutdowns because many Japanese companies had accumulated rare earth stockpiles in the last few years. Still, the interruption of shipments caused dismay and alarm in the Japanese business community and Japan’s government. ||||| The Obama administration filed a trade complaint on Tuesday asking China to loosen its restrictions on exports of rare-earth minerals — materials essential to the manufacture of a wide range of products, from missiles and computers to car batteries and cellphones. 
 
 In an appearance at the White House Rose Garden, President Obama announced that the United States has asked the World Trade Organization to facilitate formal consultations with China over its limits on rare-earth exports, in a case filed jointly with Japan and the European Union. 
 
 Officials in Beijing said Tuesday that China will vigorously defend its right to control the export of such materials. The official state-run news agency, Xinhua, warned that any U.S. move to lodge a trade complaint over the issue would “backfire.” 
 
 In choosing to make a stand, U.S. officials are highlighting an industry over which China has a near-monopoly. The country now produces more than 95 percent of the world’s rare-earth minerals, which are used in almost all advanced industrial products, from helicopter blades to solar panels to the batteries in electric cars to flat-screen televisions. 
 
 And China has shown in recent years that it is not afraid to use its dominance in the crucial market as a cudgel. In 2010, during a territorial dispute with Japan, the Chinese government halted the shipment of anything containing so-called “rare-earths” to Japan, causing a temporary panic among electronics manufacturers. 
 
 China has only about 30 percent of the world’s known rare-earths deposits. But other countries, including the United States, Canada and Australia, stopped mining more than a decade ago, because the price of the Chinese-produced rare earths was cheaper. 
 
 “If China would simply let the market work on its own, we’d have no objections,” Obama said during his remarks. “But their policies currently are preventing that from happening. And they go against the very rules that China agreed to follow.” 
 
 Obama added: “Being able to manufacture advanced batteries and hybrid cars in America is too important for us to stand by and do nothing. We’ve got to take control of our energy future, and we can’t let that energy industry take root in some other country because they were allowed to break the rules.” 
 
 Global buyers were rattled in 2009 when the Beijing government announced it was setting a quota on rare-earths exports, ostensibly to protect the environment and stop over-mining. 
 
 Critics saw the move as an attempt by Beijing to flex its economic muscle, aiding Chinese companies that use rare earths while driving up the costs of the metals to the United States and other countries. Beijing has also stopped issuing any new licenses for mining of rare earths, closed some illegal mines and set production caps for the metals. 
 
 In recent years, China’s stance on trade of rare earths has prompted some countries to start ramping up their future production. 
 
 The Obama administration argues that China’s export restrictions give Chinese companies an unfair advantage. The action against China comes during a U.S. election year in which Obama’s potential Republican opponents are lodging pointed accusations of unfair trade practices by China. The president has vowed in recent weeks to level the economic playing field. 
 
 “America’s workers and manufacturers are being hurt in both established and budding industrial sectors by these policies,” U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said in a statement. “China continues to make its export restraints more restrictive, resulting in massive distortions and harmful disruptions in supply chains for these materials throughout the global marketplace.” 
 
 But Chinese leaders may prove equally heated and unyielding on the issue, as they are in the middle of a leadership transition of their own. 
 
 In a Foreign Ministry briefing Tuesday, spokesman Liu Weimin defended China’s rare-earths exports limits. 
 
 “We believe such measures comply with WTO rules,” Liu said. He described as “groundless” the accusation that China was using its position to control a valuable commodity and benefit Chinese firms. 
 
 “Despite such huge environmental pressure, China has been taking measures to maintain rare-earth exports,” Liu said.“China will continue to supply rare earths to the international market.” 
 
 Miao Wei, the minister of industry and information technology, was quoted telling the Xinhua news agency, “We feel sorry for their decision to complain to the WTO.... We are actively preparing to defend ourselves and will explain the case if they bring the complaint against us.” 
 
 Xinhua also weighed in with an immediate commentary Tuesday — picked up verbatim by other Chinese news outlets such as China Daily — which warned that taking the case to the WTO could trigger a trade dispute. The swift reaction was rare since China usually waits until official action is taken — in this case, until the WTO case is actually filed — before making any comment. 
 
 “The U.S. decision to bring a lawsuit against China over its rare-earth export quotas is likely to hurt bilateral trade ties and trigger a backlash from China instead of settling the rift,” the Xinhua commentary said. 
 
 The commentary said China’s restrictions on exports, its production caps and its suspension of new mining licenses followed WTO rules allowing countries to protect a valuable resource and prevent excessive mining that could degrade the environment. 
 
 “It is rash and unfair for the United States to put forward a lawsuit against China before the WTO, which may hurt economic relations between the world’s largest and second-largest economies,” Xinhua said. “In the face of such unreasonable and unfair charges, China will make no hesitation in defending its legitimate rights in trade disputes.” 
 
 Richburg reported from Beijing. ||||| President Barack Obama warned China Tuesday that it would not be allowed to gain a competitive advantage in world trade by "skirting the rules." 
 
 Making an election-year pitch to American workers, and businesses as well, Obama announced Washington has brought a new trade case against Beijing. The goal is to pressure China, a rising Asian economic power, to end its restrictions on exports of key materials used to manufacture hybrid car batteries, flat screen televisions and other high tech-goods. 
 
 "If China would simply let the market work on its own, we'd have no objection," Obama said during remarks at the White House. "But their policies currently are preventing that from happening. And they go against the very rules that China agreed to follow." 
 
 The U.S., working in conjunction with the European Union and Japan, asked the World Trade Organization Tuesday to facilitate talks with China over its curtailment of exports of what's known as rare earth minerals. Obama cast the fresh action against China as part of a broader push to level the playing field for U.S. companies. 
 
 "When it is necessary, I will take action if our workers and our businesses are being subjected to unfair practices," Obama said. 
 
 With the U.S economy slowly recovering from recession, Obama has sought to bring a renewed focus on Chinese policies that could hinder U.S. expansion. He used an executive order last month to create a new trade enforcement agency _ the Interagency Trade Enforcement Center _ to move aggressively against China and other nations. 
 
 But Obama's posture on China has already surfaced as an election-year issue, with Republican front-runner Mitt Romney criticizing him for refusing so far to cite China for manipulating its currency. Romney has said he would label China a currency manipulator on his first day in office, a move that could lead to trade sanctions against Beijing. 
 
 China has a stranglehold on the global supply of 17 rare earth minerals that are essential for making high-tech goods, including hybrid cars, weapons, flat-screen TVs, mobile phones, mercury-vapor lights, smartphones and camera lenses. The materials also are used in the manufacture of tiny motors, such as those used to raise and lower car windows and in consumer electronics. 
 
 China has reduced its export quotas of these rare earth minerals over the past several years to cope with a growing demand during rapid business expansion at home, although Chinese officials also cite environmental concerns as the reason for the restrictions. U.S. industry officials suggest it is an unfair trade practice that violates rules established by the WTO, a group that includes China as a member. 
 
 Administration officials said Beijing's export restrictions give Chinese companies a competitive advantage by providing them access to more of these rare materials at a cheaper price, while forcing U.S. companies to manage with a smaller, more costly supply. 
 
 "America's workers and manufacturers are being hurt in both established and budding industrial sectors by these policies," U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk said in a statement. "China continues to make its export restraints more restrictive, resulting in massive distortions and harmful disruptions in supply chains for these materials throughout the global marketplace." 
 
 On Tuesday, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesman defended Beijing's curbs on rare earth production as necessary to limit environmental damage and conserve scarce resources. 
 
 "We think the policy is in line with WTO rules," the spokesman, Liu Weimin, said at a briefing. 
 
 He rejected complaints that China is limiting exports. "Exports have been stable. China will continue to export, and will manage rare earths based on WTO rules," Liu said. 
 
 The spokesman noted that China has about 35 percent of rare earth deposits but accounts for more than 90 percent of global production. "China hopes other countries can shoulder responsibility for supplies and can find alternative resources," he said. 
 
 Rare earth minerals are scattered throughout the Earth's crust, but only in small quantities, making them hard to mine. However, rich deposits of these rare earth oxides are in China, giving it command of the market. 
 
 The U.S. has just one rare earth mining company, the Colorado-based Molycorp Inc. There are also working mines in Australia, and a proposed one in Malaysia. 
 
 Under the terms of the WTO complaint, China has 10 days to respond and must hold talks with the U.S., E.U. and Japan within 60 days. If an agreement cannot be reached within that time frame, the U.S. and its partners could request a formal WTO panel to investigate Chinese practices. 
 
 ___ 
 
 Associated Press writer Tom Raum contributed to this report.
– China has resumed its shipment of rare earth minerals to the United States, after cutting us off early last week, the New York Times reports. Shipments to Japan, which have been suspended since September due to disputes involving the arrest of Chinese fishermen, also resumed, though they are facing some delays. The decision came hours after an announcement by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that she would travel to China tomorrow to discuss the matter. She called the suspension a “wake-up call,” saying the US and Japan need to find alternate supplies of these materials. China, which produces 95% of the world's rare earth minerals, has repeatedly downgraded its export levels of these materials over the last five years; what it currently ships is well below world demand. Read the full article.