Is neuropsychological testing useful in the management of sport-related concussion? Exploring differences in computerized neurocognitive concussion testing between African American and White athletes. Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population. SEX DIFFERENCES IN NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND POST‐CONCUSSION SYMPTOMS OF CONCUSSED COLLEGIATE ATHLETES A prospective study of physician-observed concussions during junior ice hockey: implications for incidence rates. Assessment of mild traumatic brain injury with the King-Devick Test® in an emergency department sample HISTORY OF MULTIPLE SELF‐REPORTED CONCUSSIONS IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED COGNITIVE ABILITIES Relation between subjective fogginess and neuropsychological testing following concussion. Prevalence of neurocognitive and balance deficits in collegiate aged football players without clinically diagnosed concussion. The reliability and validity of video analysis for the assessment of the clinical signs of concussion in Australian football. Evaluation of the King–Devick test as a concussion screening tool in high school football players Return to play after an initial or recurrent concussion in a prospective study of physician-observed junior ice hockey concussions: implications for return to play after a concussion. Tracking Neurocognitive Performance following Concussion in High School Athletes The Hyperemesis Impact of Symptoms Questionnaire: development and validation of a clinical tool. Comparison of tools for assessing the methodological quality of primary and secondary studies in health technology assessment reports in Germany MEASUREMENT OF HEAD IMPACTS IN COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL PLAYERS: RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEAD IMPACT BIOMECHANICS AND ACUTE CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER CONCUSSION Use of the King–Devick test for sideline concussion screening in junior rugby league Effect of soccer heading ball speed on S100B, sideline concussion assessments and head impact kinematics Effect of acute exercise on clinically measured reaction time in collegiate athletes. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients
OBJECTIVE Neuropsychological ( NP ) testing has been used for several years as a way of detecting the effects of sport-related concussion in order to aid in return-to-play determinations . In addition to st and ard pencil- and -paper tests , computerized NP tests are being commercially marketed for this purpose to professional , collegiate , high school , and elementary school programs . However , a number of important questions regarding the clinical validity and utility of these tests remain unanswered , and these questions present serious challenges to the applicability of NP testing for the management of sport-related concussion . Our purpose is to outline the criteria that should be met in order to establish the utility of NP instruments as a tool in the management of sport-related concussion and to review the degree to which existing tests have met these criteria . DATA SOURCES A comprehensive literature review of MEDLINE and PsychLit from 1990 to 2004 , including all prospect i ve , controlled studies of NP testing in sport-related concussion . DATA SYNTHESIS The effects of concussion on NP test performance are so subtle even during the acute phase of injury ( 1 - 3 days postinjury ) that they often fail to reach statistical significance in group studies . Thus , this method may lack utility in individual decision making because of a lack of sensitivity . In addition , most of these tests fail to meet other psychometric criteria ( eg , adequate reliability ) necessary for this purpose . Finally , it is unclear that NP testing can detect impairment in players once concussion-related symptoms ( eg , headache ) have resolved . Because no current guideline for the management of sport-related concussion allows a symptomatic player to return to sport , the incremental utility of NP testing remains question able . CONCLUSIONS / RECOMMENDATIONS Despite the theoretic rationale for the use of NP testing in the management of sport-related concussion , no NP tests have met the necessary criteria to support a clinical application at this time . Additional research is necessary to establish the utility of these tests before they can be considered part of a routine st and ard of care , and concussion recovery should be monitored via the st and ard clinical examination and subjective symptom checklists until NP testing or other methods are proven effective for this purpose The purpose of the current study was to explore potential differences in pre- and post-concussion performance on a computerized neurocognitive concussion test between African American and White high-school and collegiate student-athletes . A prospect i ve case-control design was used to compare baseline and 2- and 7-day post-concussion computerized neurocognitive performance and symptoms between 48 White and 48 African American athletes matched for age , gender , and concussion history . The Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment Cognitive Test ( ImPACT ) version 2.0 ( NeuroHealth System , LLC , Pittsburgh , PA , USA ) computer software program was used to assess neurocognitive function ( i.e. , verbal and visual memory , motor processing speed , and reaction time ) and concussion symptoms . Regardless of race/ethnicity , there were significant decrements in computerized neurocognitive performance and increased symptoms following a concussion for the entire sample . African Americans and Whites did not differ significantly on baseline or post-concussion verbal memory , visual memory , reaction time , and total reported symptoms . However , African American participants were 2.4 × more likely to have at least one clinical ly significant cognitive decline on ImPACT at 7 days post-concussion and scored lower at 7 days post-concussion compared with baseline on processing speed than White participants . The authors concluded that the baseline ImPACT test was culturally equivalent and construct valid for use with these two racial/ethnic groups . However , in contrast , the findings support deleterious performance for the African American athletes compared with the White athletes on the ImPACT post-concussion evaluation that is of critical clinical relevance and warrants further research This study explored the diagnostic utility of the composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ( ImPACT ) and Post Concussion Symptom Scale scores ( PCSS ) . Recently concussed high school athletes ( N=72 ) were tested within 72 h of sustaining a concussion , and data were compared to non-concussed high school athletes with no history of concussion ( N=66 ) . Between-groups MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect of concussion on test performance ( p<.001 ) ; univariate ANOVAS revealed all six measures contributed to the between-groups differences . A discriminant function analyses was conducted to measure the ability of the five ImPACT composite scores , as well as the PCSS to classify concussion status . One discriminant function was identified that consisted of the Visual Memory , Processing Speed , and Impulse Control composite scores PCSS , which correctly classified 85.5 % of the cases . Approximately 82 % of participants in the concussion group and 89 % of participants in the control group were correctly classified . Using these data , the sensitivity of ImPACT was 81.9 % , and the specificity was 89.4 % . As part of a formal concussion management program , ImPACT is a useful tool for the assessment of the neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae of concussion , and can also provide post-injury cognitive and symptom data that can assist a practitioner in making safer return to play decisions Computerized neurocognitive assessment tools ( NCATs ) are increasingly used for baseline and post-concussion assessment s. To date , NCATs have not demonstrated strong test-retest reliabilities . Most studies have used non-military population s and different method ologies , complicating the determination of the utility of NCATs in military population s. The test-retest reliability of four NCATs ( Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics 4 [ ANAM4 ]  ,  CNS-Vital Signs , CogState  , and Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test [ ImPACT ] ) was investigated in a healthy active duty military sample . Four hundred and nineteen Service Members were r and omly assigned to take one NCAT and 215 returned after approximately 30 days for retest . Participants deemed to have inadequate effort during one or both testing sessions , according to the NCATs scoring algorithms , were removed from analyses . Each NCAT had at least one reliability score ( intraclass correlation ) in the " adequate " range ( .70-.79 ) , only ImPACT had one score considered " high " ( .80-.89 ) , and no scores met " very high " criteria ( .90-.99 ) . However , overall test-retest reliabilities in four NCATs in a military sample are consistent with reliabilities reported in the literature and are lower than desired for clinical decision-making OBJECTIVE Our purpose was to determine whether sex differences exist with respect to post-concussion symptoms and neurocognitive function in concussed collegiate athletes . METHODS A prospect i ve dependent- sample cohort design was used to compare baseline and post-concussion neuropsychological test scores and endorsed symptoms as functions of serial post-concussion assessment with respect to time and sex . The Immediate Post-concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ( ImPACT ) battery was administered to a multicenter analysis group of 79 concussed athletes . This computerized neuropsychological test was given to the athletes during the preseason and , on average , 2 and 8 days postinjury . RESULTS Multivariate analyses revealed no significant between-group differences on baseline test performance with respect to sex on any of the ImPACT composite scores or on the total symptom score . Multivariate analyses of post-concussion data revealed a significant main effect of time on ImPACT scores , but no main effect of sex was identified , and no time-by-sex interaction existed . Post hoc analysis revealed that concussed female athletes performed significantly worse than concussed male athletes on visual memory tasks ( P = 0.001 ) , and analysis of endorsed post-concussion symptoms revealed that concussed men were significantly more likely than concussed women to report post-concussion symptoms of vomiting ( P = 0.001 ) and sadness ( P = 0.017 ) . Athletes ' scores were examined individually using the reliable-change methodology . At 2 days post-injury , 58 % of concussed athletes had one or more reliable incidents of performance decline or increases in symptom reporting . At 8 days post-concussion , 30 % of concussed athletes were still showing one or more reliable change from preseason values . CONCLUSIONS College athletes exhibit differences on visual memory composite scores and symptoms post-concussion as a function of sex . These data support the importance of evaluating neuropsychological status and post-concussion symptoms in concussed athletes . In addition , these data illustrate the importance of analyzing an individual athlete 's recovery pattern , because individual differences in recovery trajectories may be overshadowed by global norm-group comparisons OBJECT The objective of this study was to measure the incidence of concussion ( scaled relative to number of athlete exposures ) and recurrent concussion within 2 teams of fourth-tier junior ice hockey players ( 16 - 21 years old ) during 1 regular season . METHODS A prospect i ve cohort study called the Hockey Concussion Education Project was conducted during 1 junior ice hockey regular season ( 2009 - 2010 ) involving 67 male fourth-tier ice hockey players ( mean age 18.2 ± 1.2 years , range 16 - 21 years ) from 2 teams . Prior to the start of the season , every player underwent baseline assessment s using the Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool 2 ( SCAT2 ) and the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test ( ImPACT ) . The study protocol also required players who entered the study during the season to complete baseline SCAT2 and ImPACT testing . If the protocol was not followed , the postinjury test results of a player without true baseline test results would be compared against previously established age and gender group normative levels . Each regular season game was observed by a qualified physician and at least 1 other neutral nonphysician observer . Players who suffered a suspected concussion were evaluated at the game . If a concussion diagnosis was made , the player was subsequently examined in the physician 's office for a full clinical evaluation and the SCAT2 and ImPACT were repeated . Based on these evaluations , players were counseled on the decision of when to return to play . Athlete exposure was defined as 1 game played by 1 athlete . RESULTS Twenty-one concussions occurred during the 52 physician-observed games ( incidence 21.5 concussions per 1000 athlete exposures ) . Five players experienced repeat concussions . No concussions were reported during practice sessions . A concussion was diagnosed by the physician in 19 ( 36.5 % ) of the 52 observed games . One of the 5 individuals who suffered a repeat concussion sustained his initial concussion in a regular season game that was not observed by a physician , and as a result this single case was not included in the total of 21 total concussions . This initial concussion of the player was identified during baseline testing 2 days after the injury and was subsequently medically diagnosed and treated . CONCLUSIONS The incidence of game-related concussions ( per 100 [ corrected ] athlete exposures ) in these fourth-tier junior [ corrected ] ice hockey players was 7 [ corrected ] times higher than [ corrected ] previously reported in the literature . This difference may be the result of the use of st and ardized direct physician observation , diagnosis , and subsequent treatment . The results of this study demonstrate the need for follow-up studies involving larger and more diverse sample groups to reflect generalizability of the findings . These follow-up studies should involve other contact sports ( for example football and rugby ) and also include the full spectrum of gender , age , and skill levels Abstract Objective : The King-Devick Test ® ( K-D ) is a brief measure of cognitive processing speed and rapid gaze shifting that appears sensitive to the effects of sport-related concussion . This study evaluated its diagnostic and incremental validity in civilian patients with mild traumatic brain injury ( MTBI ) . Methods : Participants with MTBI ( n = 26 ) and controls with non-head injuries ( n = 33 ) were prospect ively recruited from an Emergency Department ( ED ) . They underwent a clinical evaluation including the  K-D test and the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 2 ( SCAT2 ) . Magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) was conducted within 10 days post-injury . Results : The patients with MTBI differed from those without MTBI on components of the SCAT2 , including the Symptom Scale ( Cohen ’s d = 1.02–1.15 , p < 0.001 ) and St and ardized Assessment of Concussion ( d = 0.81 , p = 0.004 ) , but not the K-D test ( d = 0.40 , p = 0.148 ) . In a logistic regression analysis , the K-D Test did not contribute over and above these two measures in predicting group membership ( MTBI vs. control ) , p = 0.191 . Low K-D Test scores in the MTBI group ( < 1 SD below controls ) were not associated with poor SCAT2 performance , loss of consciousness or traumatic abnormalities on MRI , suggesting these cases may have been false positives . Conclusions : The present findings do not support the K-D Test for the assessment of civilian MTBI in an ED setting OBJECTIVE The long-term impact of sports-related concussion is uncertain . Several studies using traditional neuropsychological measures have found a relationship between a previous history of concussion and reduced cognitive abilities . In contrast , studies using computerized neuropsychological measures have typically found no relationship between concussion history and cognition . In the present study , we examined the association between a self-reported concussion history and cognition using traditional and computer-based neuropsychological tests . METHODS A computerized neuropsychological battery was administered to a sample of 858 collegiate male athletes . Of this sample , 298 athletes reported a history of concussion . A traditional neuropsychological battery was administered to a separate sample of 479 male collegiate athletes , 187 of whom reported a history of concussion . Finally , both a computerized and a traditional neuropsychological battery were administered to a third distinct sample of 175 male collegiate athletes , 57 of whom reported a history of concussion . Concussion history was assessed via self-report . None of the athletes had been concussed in the 6 months before testing . RESULTS No significant association was found between self-reported concussion history and performance on either  computerized or traditional neuropsychological tests .  CONCLUSION Findings suggest that athletes who report a distant history of concussion have minimal enduring neurocognitive deficits . Given conflicting findings in the literature , prospect i ve studies that attempt to identify moderating factors are necessary to help determine who is at risk for long-term cognitive difficulties after concussion The purpose of this study was to examine the relation between the subjective report of feeling foggy at one-week post concussion and acute neuropsychological outcome . The outcome variables were derived from a computerized neuropsychological screening battery , Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing ( ImPACT ) . Participants were 110 high school students who sustained a sports-related concussion and were evaluated 5 - 10 days post injury ( M = 6.8 days ) . Athletes were divided into two groups on the basis of self-reported fogginess . The first group reported no fogginess ( n = 91 ) , whereas the second group reported experiencing some degree of fogginess ( n = 19 ) on a 6-point scale . The athletes with persistent fogginess experienced a large number of other post-concussion symptoms , compared to the athletes with no reported fogginess . In addition , the athletes with persistent fogginess had significantly slower reaction times , reduced memory performance , and slower processing speed . Thus , athletes with any degree of self-reported fogginess at one-week post injury are likely to have adverse effects from their concussions in multiple domains STUDY DESIGN Prospect i ve cohort . OBJECTIVES To identify the prevalence of neurocognitive and balance deficits in collegiate football players 48 hours following competition . BACKGROUND Neurocognitive testing , balance assessment s , and subjective report of symptoms are a commonly used test battery in examining athletes when concussion is suspected . Previous literature suggests many concussions go unreported . Little research exists examining the prevalence of neurocognitive or balance deficits in athletes who do not report concussion-like symptoms to a health care provider . METHODS Forty-five Division IA collegiate football players participated in this study . Preseason baseline scores using the  Balance Error Scoring System , the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing , and the Postconcussion Symptom Scale  were compared to posttest results obtained 48 hours following a game . Prevalence of symptoms was analyzed and reported . RESULTS Thirty-two ( 71 % ) of the 45 athletes tested demonstrated at least 1 deficit in either the Postconcussion Symptom Scale , Balance Error Scoring System , or at least 1 composite score of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing . Nineteen of the 32 subjects demonstrated a change in 2 or more categories of neurocognitive and balance function . CONCLUSION In a cohort of football players tested 48 hours following their last game of the season , who did not seek medical attention related to a concussion , a significant number demonstrated limitations in neurocognitive and balance performance , suggesting that further research may need to be performed to improve recognition of an athlete 's deficits and to improve the ability to assess concussion . LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence , level 3b OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to determine the reliability and validity of identifying clinical signs of concussion using  video analysis in Australian football . DESIGN Prospect i ve cohort study . METHODS All impacts and collisions potentially result ing in a concussion were identified during 2012 and 2013 Australian Football League seasons . Consensus definitions were developed for clinical signs associated with concussion . For intra- and inter-rater reliability analysis , two experienced clinicians independently assessed 102 r and omly selected videos  on two occasions . Sensitivity , specificity , positive and negative predictive values were calculated based on the diagnosis provided by team medical staff . RESULTS 212 incidents result ing in possible concussion were identified in 414 Australian Football League games . The intra-rater reliability of the  video-based identification of signs associated with concussion was good to excellent . Inter-rater reliability was good to excellent for impact seizure , slow to get up , motor incoordination , ragdoll appearance ( 2 of 4 analyses ) , clutching at head and facial injury . Inter-rater reliability for loss of responsiveness and blank and vacant look was only fair and did not reach statistical significance . The feature with the highest sensitivity was slow to get up ( 87 % ) , but this sign had a low specificity ( 19 % ) . Other video signs had a high specificity but low sensitivity . Blank and vacant look ( 100 % ) and motor incoordination ( 81 % ) had the highest positive predictive value . CONCLUSIONS Video analysis may be a useful adjunct to the side-line assessment of a possible concussion . Video analysis however should not replace the need for a thorough multimodal clinical assessment OBJECTIVE Concussion is the most common type of traumatic brain injury , and results from impact or impulsive forces to the head , neck or face . Due to the variability and subtlety of symptoms , concussions may go unrecognized or be ignored , especially with the pressure placed on athletes to return to competition . The King-Devick ( KD ) test , an oculomotor test originally design ed for reading evaluation , was recently vali date d as a concussion screening tool in collegiate athletes . A prospect i ve study was performed using high school football players in an attempt to study the KD as a concussion screening tool in this younger population . METHODS 343 athletes from four local high school football teams were recruited to participate . These athletes were given baseline KD tests prior to competition . Individual demographic information was collected on the subjects . St and ard team protocol was employed to determine if a concussion had occurred during competition . Immediately after diagnosis , the KD test was re-administered to the concussed athlete for comparison to baseline . Post-season testing was also performed in non-concussed individuals . RESULTS Of the 343 athletes , nine were diagnosed with concussions . In all concussed players , cumulative read times for the KD test were significantly increased ( p<0.001 ) . Post-season testing of non-concussed athletes revealed minimal change in read times relative to baseline . Univariate analysis revealed that history of concussion was the only demographic factor predictive of concussion in this cohort . CONCLUSION The KD test is an accurate and easily administered sideline screening tool for concussion in adolescent football players OBJECT The authors investigated return-to-play duration for initial and recurrent concussion in the same season in 2 teams of junior ( 16 - 21-year-old ) ice hockey players during a regular season . METHODS The authors conducted a prospect i ve cohort study during 1 junior regular season ( 2009 - 2010 ) of 67 male fourth-tier ice hockey players ( mean age 18.2 ± 1.2 years [ SD ] , range 16 - 21 years ) from 2 teams . Prior to the start of the season , every player underwent baseline assessment s that were determined using the  Sideline Concussion Assessment Tool 2 ( SCAT2 ) and the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test ( ImPACT ) . The study protocol also required players who entered the study during the season to complete a baseline SCAT2 and ImPACT . If the protocol was not followed , the postinjury test results of a player without true baseline test results were compared with previously established age- and sex-matched group normative levels . Each game was directly observed by a physician and at least 1 neutral nonphysician observer . Players suspected of suffering a concussion were evaluated by the physician during the game . If a concussion was diagnosed , the player underwent clinical evaluation at the physician 's office within 24 hours . The return-to-play decision was based on clinical evaluation guided by the Zurich return-to-play protocol ( contained in the consensus statement of international expert opinion at the 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport held in Zurich , November 2008 ) . This clinical evaluation and return-to-play protocol was augmented by the 2 tests ( SCAT2 and ImPACT ) also recommended by the Zurich consensus statement , for which baseline values had been obtained . RESULTS Seventeen players sustained a physician-observed or self-reported , physician-diagnosed concussion during a physician-observed ice hockey game . The mean clinical return-to-play duration ( in 15 cases ) was 12.8 ± 7.02 days ( median 10 days , range 7 - 29 days ) ; the mean number of physician office visits by players who suffered a concussion ( 15 cases ) was 2.1 ± 1.29 ( median 1.5 visits ) . Five of the 17 players who sustained a concussion also suffered a recurrent or second concussion . One of the 5 individuals who suffered a repeat concussion sustained his initial concussion in a regular season game that was not observed by a physician , and as a result this single case was not included in the total of 21 concussions . This initial concussion of the player was identified during baseline testing 2 days after the injury and was subsequently medically diagnosed and treated . The mean interval between the first and second concussions in these 5 players was 78.6 ± 39.8 days ( median 82 days ) , and the mean time between the return-to-play date of the first and second concussions was 61.8 ± 39.7 days ( median 60 days ) . CONCLUSIONS The mean rates of return to play for single and recurrent concussions were higher than rates cited in recent studies involving sport concussions . The time interval between the first and second concussions was also greater than previously cited . This difference may be the result of the methodology of direct independent physician observation , diagnosis , and adherence to the Zurich return-to-play protocol Abstract Objective : To extend previous research design s and examine cognitive performance up to 30 days postconcussion . Method : A prospect i ve cohort design was used to examine 2000 athletes from 8 mid-Michigan area high schools to compare baseline neurocognitive performance with postconcussion neurocognitive performance . All concussed athletes were readministered the Immediate Post Assessment and Cognitive Test ( ImPACT ) at 2 , 7 , 14 , 21 , and 30 days postconcussion . Results : A total of 72 high school athletes ( aged 15.8 ± 1.34 years ) sustained a concussion . A significant with in-subjects effect for reaction time ( F = 10.01 ; P = 0.000 ) , verbal memory ( F = 3.05 ; P = 0.012 ) , motor processing speed ( F = 18.51 ; P = 0.000 ) , and total symptoms following an injury ( F = 16.45 ; P = 0.000 ) was found . Concussed athletes demonstrated a significant decrease in reaction time up to 14 days postconcussion ( P = 0.001 ) compared with baseline reaction time . Reaction time returned to baseline levels at 21 days postinjury ( P = 0.25 ) . At 7 days postinjury , impairments in verbal memory ( P = 0.003 ) and motor processing speed ( P = 0.000 ) were documented and returned to baseline levels by 14 days postinjury . Concussed athletes self-reported significantly more symptoms at 2 days postconcussion ( P = 0.000 ) and exhibited a resolution of symptoms by 7 days postinjury ( P = 0.06 ) . Conclusion : High school athletes could take up to 21 days to return to baseline levels for reaction time . These data support current recommendations for the conservative management of concussion in the high school athlete BACKGROUND The Hyperemesis Impact of Symptoms Question naire is a clinical tool design ed to assess holistically the impact of the physical and psychosocial symptoms of hyperemesis gravidarum ( HG ) on individuals . Its purpose is to aid planning and implementation of tailored care for women with HG . To our knowledge no similar tool exists . OBJECTIVE To assess the validity and reliability of the HIS question naire . DESIGN As no similar tool exists , we compared the HIS with three tools that reflect its key areas : physical impact ( Pregnancy Unique Quantification of Emesis -- PUQE score and markers of severity of HG ) , psychological impact ( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score -- HADS ) and social impact ( SF12 quality of life score ) . SETTING A large regional referral , women and children 's hospital in the North West of Engl and . PARTICIPANTS The HIS was evaluated on 50 women admitted to hospital with HG and 50 women recruited from ante-natal clinic without severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy and with an uncomplicated pregnancy . RESULTS Good criterion validity was demonstrated by strong significant correlations with all three scores ( PUQE , r=0.75 , p<0.001 , HADS , depression r=0.76 , p<0.001 , and SF12 , mental component r=-0.65 , p<0.001 ) . The HIS showed good internal consistency , Cronbach alpha 0.87 , split half 0.80 . CONCLUSIONS There is evidence for the validity and reliability of the HIS to assess the impact of the physical and psychosocial symptoms of HG . Further research is currently underway to establish the clinical utility of the HIS question naire in the care of women hospitalised with HG Health care policy background Findings from scientific studies form the basis for evidence -based health policy decisions . Scientific background Quality assessment s to evaluate the credibility of study results are an essential part of health technology assessment reports and systematic review s. Quality assessment tools ( QAT ) for assessing the study quality examine to what extent study results are systematic ally distorted by confounding or bias ( internal validity ) . The tools can be divided into checklists , scales and component ratings . Research questions What QAT are available to assess the quality of interventional studies or studies in the field of health economics , how do they differ from each other and what conclusions can be drawn from these results for quality assessment s ? Methods A systematic search of relevant data bases from 1988 onwards is done , supplemented by screening of the references , of the HTA reports of the German Agency for Health Technology Assessment ( DAHTA ) and an internet search . The selection of relevant literature , the data extraction and the quality assessment are carried out by two independent review ers . The substantive elements of the QAT are extracted using a modified criteria list consisting of items and domains specific to r and omized trials , observational studies , diagnostic studies , systematic review s and health economic studies . Based on the number of covered items and domains , more and less comprehensive QAT are distinguished . In order to exchange experiences regarding problems in the practical application of tools , a workshop is hosted . Results A total of eight systematic method ological review s is identified as well as 147 QAT : 15 for systematic review s , 80 for r and omized trials , 30 for observational studies , 17 for diagnostic studies and 22 for health economic studies . The tools vary considerably with regard to the content , the performance and quality of operationalisation . Some tools do not only include the items of internal validity but also the items of quality of reporting and external validity . No tool covers all elements or domains . Design -specific generic tools are presented , which cover most of the content criteria . Discussion The evaluation of QAT by using content criteria is difficult , because there is no scientific consensus on the necessary elements of internal validity , and not all of the generally accepted elements are based on empirical evidence . Comparing QAT with regard to contents neglects the operationalisation of the respective parameters , for which the quality and precision are important for transparency , replicability , the correct assessment and interrater reliability . QAT , which mix items on the quality of reporting and internal validity , should be avoided . Conclusions There are different , design -specific tools available which can be preferred for quality assessment , because of its wider coverage of substantive elements of internal validity . To minimise the subjectivity of the assessment , tools with a detailed and precise operationalisation of the individual elements should be applied . For health economic studies , tools should be developed and complemented with instructions , which define the appropriateness of the criteria . Further research is needed to identify study characteristics that influence the internal validity of studies OBJECTIVE To determine the relationship between recorded head accelerations and impact locations and acute clinical outcome of symptomatology , neuropsychological , and postural stability tests after cerebral concussion in Division I collegiate football players . METHODS A prospect i ve field study was used in which accelerometers were embedded in the football helmets of 88 collegiate football players .  Linear and rotational accelerations of all head impacts sustained over the course of 2004 to 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association football seasons were collected in real-time . Change scores were calculated on clinical measures from the players ' preseason baseline to postinjury ( within 48 h ) and regressed against the recorded linear and rotational accelerations of the head at the time of the concussion . RESULTS Thirteen concussions were recorded ranging in impact magnitudes of 60.51 to 168.71 g. Linear regression showed no significant relationships between impact magnitude ( linear or rotational acceleration ) or impact location and change scores for symptom severity , postural stability , or neurocognitive function ( P > 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that football players are concussed by impacts to the head that occur at a wide range of magnitudes and that clinical measures of acute symptom severity , postural stability , and neuropsychological function all appear to be largely independent of impact magnitude and location . Because of the varying magnitudes and locations of impacts result ing in concussion as well as other factors such as the frequency of subconcussive impacts and number of previous concussions , it may be difficult to establish a threshold for concussive injury that can be applied to all football players AIM To determine whether the King-Devick ( K-D ) test used as a sideline test in junior rugby league players over 12 matches in a domestic competition season could identify witnessed and incidentally identified episodes of concussion . METHODS A prospect i ve observational cohort study of a club level junior rugby league team ( n=19 ) during the 2014 New Zeal and competition season involved every player completing two pre-competition season baseline trials of the K-D test .  Players removed from match participation , or who reported any signs or symptoms of concussion were assessed on the sideline with the K-D test and referred for further medical assessment . Players with a pre- to post-match K-D test difference > 3s were referred for physician evaluation . RESULTS The baseline test-retest reliability of the K-D test was high ( rs=0.86 ; p<0.0001 ) . Seven concussions were medically identified in six players who recorded pre- to post-match K-D test times greater than 3s ( mean change of 7.4s ) . Post-season testing of players demonstrated improvement of K-D time scores consistent with learning effects of using the K-D test ( 67.7s vs. 62.2s ) . DISCUSSION Although no witnessed concussions occurred during rugby play , six players recorded pre- to post-match changes with a mean delay of 4s result ing in seven concussions being subsequently confirmed post-match by health practitioners . All players were medically managed for a return to sports participation . CONCLUSION The K-D test was quickly and easily administered making it a practical sideline tool as part of the continuum of concussion assessment tools for junior rugby league players Abstract Objective : To examine the effect of soccer heading ball speed on S-100B serum concentration , concussion sideline assessment s and linear head impact acceleration . Methods : Sixteen division I soccer players participated in this pre-test post-test design study . Athletes performed five st and ing headers over a 10 minute period at 30 ( n = 5 ) , 40 ( n = 5 ) or 50 ( n = 6 ) miles per hour ( mph ) ( r and omized ) . S-100B serum concentration ( ng mL−1 ) and sideline concussion assessment s were measured prior to and post-heading . Peak result ant linear head acceleration ( gravitational units ; g ) was measured during soccer heading . Results : No statistically significant interaction effects were identified between ball velocity groups over time on S100B ( effect sizes ranged from 0.03–0.23 ) or concussion assessment s tests . There was a non-significant increase ( p = 0.06 ) in head impact acceleration from the 30 ( 30.6 ; SD = 6.2 g ) to 50 mph ( 50.7 ; SD = 7.7 g ) ball speed . Conclusions : In this controlled setting , an acute bout of soccer heading across various ball velocities did not affect S100B or concussion assessment test scores . These findings are preliminary , as the small sample size in each group may have played a role in the lack of significant findings PURPOSE We have developed a reliable and valid clinical test of reaction time ( RTclin ) that is sensitive to the acute effects of concussion . If RTclin is to be used as a sideline concussion assessment tool then the acute effects of exercise on RTclin may need to be controlled for . The purpose of this study was therefore to determine the effect of exercise on RTclin . METHODS A gender-balanced group of 42 collegiate athletes were assigned to an  exercise ( n = 28 ) and a  control ( n = 14 ) group using 2:1 block r and omization . The exercise group completed a grade d four-stage exercise protocol on a stationary bicycle ( 100 W × 5 min ; 150 W × 5 min ; 200 W × 5 min ; sprint × 2 min ) , whereas the control group was tested at identical periods without exercising .  Mean RTclin was calculated for eight trials as the fall time of a vertically suspended rigid shaft after its release by the examiner before being caught by the athlete . RTclin was measured at baseline and after each of the four stages . RESULTS As both HR and RPE significantly increased for the four stages in the exercise group ( P < 0.001 ) , mean RTclin showed a significant overall decline during repeated test administration ( P < 0.008 ) . However , there were no significant group ( exercise vs control , P = 0.822 ) or group-by-stage interaction ( P = 0.169 ) effects on RTclin as assessed by repeated- measures analysis of variance . CONCLUSIONS Exercise did not appear to affect RTclin performance in this study . This suggests that RTclin measured during a sideline concussion assessment does not need to be adjusted to account for the acute effects of exercise & NA ; The physical performance of chronic pain patients is of major concern both for their assessment and for treatment evaluation . However , there are few widely used physical tests , a shortage of reliability and validity data on published tests , and an over‐reliance on self‐report or on clinical measures of dubious generalisability . A set of tests was design ed to cover speed and endurance in walking , stair climbing , st and ing up from a chair , sit‐ups , arm endurance , grip strength , and peak flow . St and ard instructions and testing conditions were used by a trained tester on a population of chronic pain patients before and after a cognitive‐behavioural chronic pain management programme .  Reliability , validity , and acceptability of each test was examined , and recommendations made for their relative utility
Although the convergent validity of ImPACT was supported , evidence of discriminant and predictive validity , diagnostic accuracy and responsiveness was inconclusive .
The review found many factors influenced the validity and utility of ImPACT scores .
Background The immediate post concussion assessment and cognitive testing ( ImPACT ) is the most widely used concussion assessment tool .
Despite its popularity , it is unclear if validation studies for the ImPACT test covered all aspects of validity to support its widespread use in research and clinical practice .
Objective The purpose of this report is to review literature surrounding the validity and the utility of the ImPACT test .