Rotational alignment of femoral component between custom cutting block and conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty. Stability and alignment do not improve by using patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty. The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty Comparison between patient-specific instruments and conventional instruments and computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. Comparison of robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: A controlled cadaver study using multiparameter quantitative three-dimensional CT assessment of alignment Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: simpler, faster and more accurate than standard instrumentation—a randomized controlled trial Alignments and Clinical Results in Conventional and Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty
OBJECTIVE Rotation of femoral components could be optimized to improve function and durability of the knee joint . The purpose of the present study was to assess rotational alignment of femoral component comparing between CT-based , custom cutting blocks and the contemporary total knee arthroplasty , instrument technique . MATERIAL AND METHOD The prospect i ve control study of 80 patients underwent total knee arthroplasty by using PFC Sigma PS total knee design . Rotation offemoral component was analyzed in all patients using postoperative CT scan .  Forty patients were perfonned on by using CT-based , patient-specific cutting blocks with femoral rotational axis relative to transepicondylar axis while forty patients were performed on by using contemporaly instrumentation with alignment at 3 degrees external rotation from posterior condylar line . The rotation of the femoral component with external rotation ofmore than 3 degrees or internal rotation was considered outlier . RESULTS There was no statistically significant difference among ages , gender ; BMI , pre-operative mechanical axis between the two groups . There were eleven outliers in conventional group ( range , 5 degrees ofexternal rotation to 3 degrees of internal rotation ) , three femoral components were in excessive external rotation with the angle of more than 3 degrees and eight femnoral components were in internal rotation . In contrast with custom cutting block group was no outliers offemoral rotation . The average rotational alignment was 1.040 + /- 0.62 external rotation from epicondylar axis in custom cutting group and 1.58 + /- 1.750 in contemporary group . CONCLUSION Custom cutting , block technique significantly reduced the outlier of the femoral component rotation and aided in positioning of the femoral component in optimal alignment . The improvement of femoral rotation showed no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups Purpose The primary aim of the study was to examine stability and alignment after total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) using patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) and conventional instrumentation ( CI ) . The hypothesis was that stability and alignment would be better using PSI than CI , 12 months postoperatively . The secondary aim included the evaluation of clinical outcomes after TKA . Methods In this prospect i ve r and omized controlled trial , 42 patients with knee osteoarthritis received a Genesis II PS prosthesis with either PSI or CI . Patients visited the hospital preoperatively and postoperatively after 6 weeks and 3 and 12 months . To evaluate stability , varus – valgus laxity was determined in extension and flexion using stress radiographs 12 months postoperatively . Three months postoperatively , a long-leg radiograph and CT scan were obtained to measure hip – knee – ankle ( HKA ) alignment and component rotation . Furthermore , frontal and sagittal alignment of the components , the Knee Society Score , VAS Pain , VAS Satisfaction , Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome score , Patella score ( Kujala ) , University of California Los Angeles activity score , anterior – posterior laxity , ( serious ) adverse device-related events , and intraoperative complications were reported . The clinical outcomes were compared using independent t tests or non-parametric alternatives , and repeated measurements ANOVA with a significance level of p < 0.05 . Results No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding stability , HKA angle , and rotational alignment . In four patients , the PSI did not fit correctly on the tibia and /or femur requiring intraoperative modifications . Both groups improved significantly over time on all clinical outcomes , with no significant differences between the groups 12 months postoperatively . The PSI group showed less tibial slope than the patients in the CI group [ PSI 2.6 ° versus CI 4.8 ° ( p = 0.02 ) ] . Finally , the PSI group more frequently received a thinner insert size than the CI group ( p = 0.03 ) . Conclusions Patients operated with PSI did not differ from CI in terms of stability and alignment . However , in the PSI  group ligament releases were more often required intraoperatively . Furthermore , the two methods did not show different clinical results . It seems that the preoperative planning for the PSI facilitates more conservative bone cuts than CI , but whether this is clinical ly relevant should be investigated . Since PSI is more expensive and time consuming than CI , and does not outperform CI with regard to clinical results , we recommend to use CI.Level of evidence BACKGROUND Patient-specific femoral and tibial cutting blocks produced with use of data from preoperative computed tomography ( CT ) or magnetic resonance imaging ( MRI ) scans have been employed recently to optimize component alignment in total knee arthroplasty . We report the results of a r and omized controlled trial in which CT scans were used to compare postoperative component alignment between patients treated with custom instruments  and those managed with traditional instruments . METHODS The in-hospital data and early clinical outcomes , including Knee Society scores , were determined in a r and omized clinical trial of forty-seven patients who had undergone a total of forty-eight primary total knee arthroplasties with patient-specific instruments ( twenty-two knees ) or st and ard instruments ( twenty-six knees ) . Orientation of the implants was compared by using three-dimensional CT data . RESULTS No significant differences were found between the study and control groups with respect to any clinical outcome after a minimum of six months of follow-up . The patient-specific tibial cutting block was ab and oned in favor of a st and ard external alignment jig in seven of the twenty-two study knees because of possible malalignment . A detailed analysis of intent-to-treat and per- protocol groups of study and control knees did not show any significant improvement in component alignment , including femoral component rotation in the axial plane , in the patients treated with the custom instruments . The percentage of outliers -- defined as less than -3 ° or more than 3 ° from the correct orientation of the tibial slope -- was significantly higher in the group treated with use of patient-specific blocks than it was in the control group , in both the intent-to-treat ( 32 % versus 8 % , p = 0.032 ) and the per- protocol ( 47 % versus 6 % , p = 0.0008 ) analysis . CONCLUSIONS There were no significant improvements in clinical outcomes or knee component alignment in patients treated with patient-specific cutting blocks as compared with those treated with st and ard instruments . The group treated with patient-specific cutting blocks had a significantly higher prevalence of malalignment in terms of tibial component slope than the knees treated with st and ard instruments Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of a  patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) as assessed by the intraoperative use of knee navigation software during the surgical procedure . Methods Fifteen patients with primary gonarthrosis were selected for unilateral total knee arthroplasty . The first three patients were excluded from this study , as they were considered to be a warm up to set-up the procedure . All patients were operated on with a cemented posterior-stabilised prosthesis cruciate ligament-sacrificing by the same surgeon using the patient matched cutting jigs . The size of the implant , level of resection , and alignment in the coronal and sagittal planes were evaluated . An unsatisfactory result was considered an error ≥2 ° in both planes for each component as a possible error of 4 ° could result in aggravation . Results On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the tibial guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 1.5 ( range 0–5 ° ) and in the sagittal plane was 3.8 ± 2.4 ( range 0–7.5 ° ) . On the coronal plane the mean deviation of the femoral guide from the ideal alignment was 1.2 ± 0.6 and in the sagittal was 3.7 ± 2 . Conclusion On the basis of this preliminary experience the PSI system based only on data acquisition with A-P radiograms and RMN can not be defined as accurate . In cases of the use of the custom made cutting jigs it is recommended to perform an accurate control of the alignment before making the cuts , for any step of the procedure . Level of evidence II A total of 208 patients were enrolled in a multicenter , prospect i ve r and omized , institutional review board-approved study that compared preoperative surgical plan to postoperative 2-dimensional radiographic alignment measured by a blinded review er for  primary total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) implanted using computer-assisted surgery ( CAS ) compared with conventional TKA instrumentation . The results demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the coronal tibial component alignment ( P < .03 ) and failed to demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in the mechanical axis , femoral coronal/sagittal , and tibial sagittal alignment . Knee Society Score knee and function scores and 6-minute walk test were equivalent between the 2 treatment groups at all postoperative intervals . There was a statistically significant increase in the skin-skin time ( P < .0001 ) and the time until first bone cut ( P < .0001 ) for the CAS knees compared with those implanted with conventional instrumentation . The use of CAS in this r and omized clinical trial conducted at high-volume centers did not offer a clinical ly meaningful improvement in postoperative alignment , clinical , functional , or safety outcomes compared with conventional TKA Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the post-operative radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) surgery versus conventional total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) . Methods Sixty patients scheduled for a primary TKA were prospect ively divided into PSI or conventional technique . Coronal and sagittal radiographic long limb films were taken post-operatively . The accepted values for normal alignment were 180 ° ± 3 ° for hip-knee-ankle angle ; 90 ° ± 3 ° for coronal femoral component angle or coronal tibia component angle ; 0 ° to 3 ° flexion for sagittal femoral component angle and 0 ° to 7 ° posterior slope for sagittal tibia component angle . Results For hip-knee-ankle angle , there were 21 % more outliers in the PSI group compared to the conventional group ( p = 0.045 ) . Most of these outliers had valgus deformity in the PSI group and varus deformity in the conventional group ( p = 0.045 ) . For implant placement , there was no difference in the proportion of outliers between the two groups . There was also no difference in the duration of surgery . Conclusions This study showed that PSI surgery is associated with a larger proportion of outliers for lower limb alignment . PSI surgery as an alternative to conventional TKA is not advisable . Level of evidence II Abstract Purpose The current study investigated the accuracy in achieving proper lower limb alignment and individual component positions after total knee arthroplasty ( TKA ) with 3 different instrumentation techniques . It was hypothesized that patient-specific instruments ( PSI ) would achieve more accurate lower limb alignment and component positions compared to conventional instruments ( CON ) . Methods Ninety knees in 81 patients were r and omized in 1:1:1 ratio into  CON , computer navigation ( NAV )  and PSI  groups to receive TKA . The surgical routines were st and ardized . The lower limb mechanical axis and individual component positions were assessed on st and ard radiographs . Tourniquet time , operation time and patients ’ functional scores were documented . Results Conventional instruments and PSI were more likely to result in an excessively flexed femoral component ( p = 0.001 ) compared to NAV . Number of outliers in postoperative lower limb alignment , and other components positions in the coronal and sagittal plane showed no statistically significant difference . The mean tourniquet time and operation time was significantly shorter in CON and PSI groups than NAV group ( p < 0.001 ) . Four early complications occurred in the PSI group ( p = 0.015 ) . At 3-month follow-up , there was no difference in terms of the knee range of motion and patients ’ function among the 3 groups . Conclusion No significant radiological and clinical benefit could be demonstrated in using PSI over CON or NAV in TKA . Routine use of PSI is not recommended because of the extra cost and waiting time . Level of evidence Patient specific cutting guides generated by preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging ( MRI ) of the patient 's extremity have been proposed as a method of improving the consistency of Total Knee Arthroplasty ( TKA ) alignment and adding efficiency to the operative procedure . The cost of this option was evaluated by quantifying the savings from decreased operative time and instrument processing costs compared to the additional cost of the MRI and the guide .  Coronal plane alignment was measured in an unselected consecutive series of 200 TKAs , 100 with st and ard instrumentation and 100 with custom cutting guides .  While the cutting guides had significantly lower total operative time and instrument processing time , the estimated $ 322 savings was overwhelmed by the $ 1,500 additional cost of the MRI and the cutting guide . All measures of coronal plane alignment were equivalent between the two groups . The data does not currently support the proposition that patient specific guides add value to TKA Introduction : A functional total knee replacement has to be well aligned , which implies that it should lie along the mechanical axis and in the correct axial and rotational planes . Incorrect alignment will lead to abnormal wear , early mechanical loosening , and patellofemoral problems . There has been increased interest of late in total knee arthroplasty with robotic assistance . This study was conducted to determine whether robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to the conventional surgical method with regard to the precision of implant positioning . Material s and Methods : Twenty knee replacements , comprising ten robot-assisted procedures and ten conventional operations , were performed on ten cadavers . Two experienced surgeons performed the surgeries . Both procedures on each cadaver were performed by the same surgeon . The choice of which procedure was to be performed first was r and omized . Following implantation of the prosthesis , the mechanical axis deviation , femoral coronal angle , tibial coronal angle , femoral sagittal angle , tibial sagittal angle , and femoral rotational alignment were measured via 3D CT scanning . These variables were then compared with the preoperatively planned values . Results : In the knees that underwent robot-assisted surgery , the mechanical axis deviation ranged from −1.94 ° to 2.13 ° ( mean : −0.21 ° ) , the femoral coronal angle from 88.08 ° to 90.99 ° ( mean : 89.81 ° ) , the tibial coronal angle from 89.01 ° to 92.36 ° ( mean : 90.42 ° ) , the tibial sagittal angle from 81.72 ° to 86.24 ° ( mean : 83.20 ° ) , and the femoral rotational alignment from 0.02 ° to 1.15 ° ( mean : 0.52 ° ) in relation to the transepicondylar axis . In the knees that underwent conventional surgery  , the mechanical axis deviation ranged from −3.19 ° to 3.84 ° ( mean : −0.48 ° ) , the femoral coronal angle from 88.36 ° to 92.29 ° ( mean : 90.50 ° ) , the tibial coronal angle from 88.15 ° to 91.51 ° ( mean : 89.83 ° ) , the tibial sagittal angle from 80.06 ° to 87.34 ° ( mean : 84.50 ° ) , and the femoral rotational alignment from 0.32 ° to 4.13 ° ( mean : 2.76 ° ) in relation to the transepicondylar axis . In the conventional knee replacement group , there were two instances of outliers outside the range of 3 ° varus/valgus for the mechanical axis deviation . The robot-assisted knee replacements showed significantly superior femoral rotational alignment results compared with conventional surgery ( p = 0.006 ) . There was no statistically significant difference between robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty with regard to the other variables . All the measurements showed high intra-observer and inter-observer reliability . Conclusion : Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty showed excellent precision in the sagittal and coronal planes of the 3D CT scan . In particular , the robot-assisted technique showed better accuracy in femoral rotational alignment compared to the conventional surgery , despite the fact that the surgeons who performed the operations were more experienced and familiar with the conventional method than with robot-assisted surgery . It can thus be concluded that robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty is superior to conventional total knee arthroplasty BACKGROUND Total knee arthroplasty has been increasingly used for young and active patients , and prosthesis durability is important in these patients . The accuracy of implant placement has been one of the major factors that determine the long-term survival of the prosthesis . The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of prosthetic alignment between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties . METHODS From March 2007 to June 2008 , thirty-two patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis underwent simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty with the same type of implant in each knee .  The subjects included seven men and twenty-five women , with an average age of sixty-three years . For each patient , the bilateral total knee arthroplasty was performed with computer-assisted navigation in one knee and a conventional technique in the other . The operative technique and the order of the surgical procedures were r and omized . The patients and surgeons conducting the follow-up study and performing the imaging measurements were blinded to the type of surgical procedure . RESULTS There was a significant difference between the two groups with regard to the alignment of the knee prosthesis in the coronal and sagittal planes . Nine knee implants ( 28 % ) in the conventional group , compared with no knee implants in the computer-navigation group , deviated > 3 ° from the mechanical axis in the coronal plane . The coefficient variation of data in the conventional group was three times greater than that in the computer-navigation group . There was no significant difference in the rotational angle of the femoral component between the two groups . The Hospital for Special Surgery ( HSS ) scores at six months postoperatively were substantially increased compared with the preoperative scores in both groups . CONCLUSIONS Computer-assisted navigation consistently provided coronal plane alignment within 3 ° of the mechanical axis , which was significantly better than the alignment obtained with conventional total knee arthroplasty Abstract Purpose This r and omized controlled trial was conducted to compare patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) to st and ard instrumentation regarding efficacy to achieve a good coronal alignment and differences in surgical time , blood loss and length of stay . Methods Ninety-five of 100 r and omized patients eligible for total knee arthroplasty were analysed .  PSI with magnetic resonance and long-leg radiograph was performed in 47 patients , while 48 patients received st and ard instrumentation .  Primary outcome measure was coronal alignment , evaluated with long-leg radiograph . Deviation > 3 ° varus/valgus was considered an outlier . Surgical time was compared from skin to skin . Length of stay was a post hoc analysis . Blood loss was evaluated comparing the number of blood units spent , fall in haemoglobin and haematocrit levels . Results St and ard instrumentation had a higher number of outliers in the coronal alignment with a relative risk of 3.015 , compared to PSI . Surgical time was reduced by 18 min ( 24.8 % ) with the  PSI  , as well as length of stay , with a half-day reduction . Number of blood units spent was significantly less in the PSI group . Relative risk of transfusion was 7.09 for patients in the st and ard instrumentation group . Difference in Hg and Htc levels were not significant . No patient had to ab and on PSI . Minor changes to preoperative plan occurred in 14.9 % of the patient : cut review in 4.3 % and insert change in 10.6 % . Conclusions Patient-specific instrumentation ( PSI ) is able to provide important advantages over st and ard instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty : it lowers the risk of outliers and transfusion , is a faster procedure and enables a shorter length of stay with a low rate of intraoperative adjustments . Level of evidence In this prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled study , we compared the performance of conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasties .  Component alignment was measured in 60 patients operated on using navigation and in 60 patients operated on using the conventional technique .  The groups then were divided into a sub population to measure alignments of the distal femoral cuts in the three anatomic planes , the proximal tibial cut in the frontal and sagittal planes , and the result ing lower limb mechanical axis in the frontal plane . Postoperative weightbearing long-view radiographs  were evaluated as were clinical results using three st and ard question naires at 28 months followup . The intraoperative measurements ( mean ± st and ard deviation ) at the resection planes showed navigated surgeries result in more accurate alignments than conventional surgeries for the femur : in the frontal plane , 0.1 ° ± 0.9 ° and 0.7 ° ± 1.6 ° valgus , respectively ; in the sagittal plane , 1.1 ° ± 1.8 ° and 2.8 ° ± 2.0 ° flexion ; and in the transversal plane , 0.1 ° ± 1.2 ° and 0.9 ° ± 1.7 ° internal rotation . The navigated technique also reduced the number of cases with final mechanical axes greater than 3 ° from 20.0 % to 1.7 % . Postoperative radiographs showed better component alignment using navigation , particularly at the femur . However , clinical scoring systems showed this radiographic improvement did not necessarily result in a better clinical outcome at short-term followup . Level of Evidence : Level I , therapeutic study . See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of level of evidence
We found that there was no significant benefit from using PS instrumentation in primary knee arthroplasty to aid in the positioning of either the tibial or femoral components .
Furthermore sagittal plane tibial component positioning was worse in the PS than the traditional ST group .
Our results suggest that at present PS instrumentation is not superior to ST instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty .
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to review the radiological alignment outcomes of patient Specific ( PS ) cutting blocks and St and ard Instrumentation in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty .
METHODS We hypothesized that the use of PS techniques would significantly improve sagittal , coronal and rotational alignment of the prosthesis on short term .