Maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in depression in adults: a systematic review protocol World Allergy Organization-McMaster University Guidelines for Allergic Disease Prevention (GLAD-P): Vitamin D Effect of vitamin D3 on mild to moderate persistent asthmatic patients: A randomized controlled pilot study Improved control of childhood asthma with low‐dose, short‐term vitamin D supplementation: a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial Effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation: protocol for a systematic review Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Moderate to Severe Bronchial Asthma DO IT Trial: vitamin D Outcomes and Interventions in Toddlers – a TARGet Kids! randomized controlled trial Effect of vitamin D3 on asthma treatment failures in adults with symptomatic asthma and lower vitamin D levels: the VIDA randomized clinical trial. The Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial (VDAART): rationale, design, and methods of a randomized, controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy for the primary prevention of asthma and allergies in children. Effect of Prenatal Supplementation With Vitamin D on Asthma or Recurrent Wheezing in Offspring by Age 3 Years: The VDAART Randomized Clinical Trial. Serum vitamin D levels and severe asthma exacerbations in the Childhood Asthma Management Program study. Double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial of bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation in adults with asthma (ViDiAs)
Introduction Maternal vitamin D status in pregnancy has been linked to many health outcomes in mother and offspring . A wealth of observational studies have reported on both obstetric outcomes and complications , including pre-eclampsia , gestational diabetes , mode and timing of delivery . Many foetal and childhood outcomes are also linked to vitamin D status , including measures of foetal size , body composition and skeletal mineralization , in addition to later childhood outcomes , such as asthma . Sources of data Synthesis of systematic and narrative review s. Areas of agreement and controversy The findings are generally inconsistent in most areas , and , at present , there is a lack of data from high- quality intervention studies to confirm a causal role for vitamin D in these outcomes . In most areas , the evidence tends towards maternal vitamin D being of overall benefit , but often does not reach statistical significance in meta-analyses . Growing points and areas timely for developing research The most conclusive evidence is in the role of maternal vitamin D supplementation in the prevention of neonatal hypocalcaemia ; as a consequence the UK department of health recommends that pregnant women take 400 IU vitamin D daily . High- quality r and omized placebo-controlled trials , such as the UK-based MAVIDOS trial , will inform the potential efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy across a variety of outcomes Background The role of vitamin D in management of depression is unclear . Results from observational and emerging r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) investigating the efficacy of vitamin D in depression lack consistency - with some suggesting a positive association while others show a negative or inconclusive association . Methods / Design The primary aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of RCTs to assess the effect of oral vitamin D supplementation versus placebo on depression symptoms measured by scales and the proportion of patients with symptomatic improvement according to the authors ’ original definition . Secondary aims include assessing the change in quality of life , adverse events and treatment discontinuation . We will conduct the systematic review and meta- analysis according to the recommendations of the Cochrane H and book for Systematic Review s of Interventions . We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL ) , MEDLINE ( 1966 to present ) , EMBASE ( 1980 to present ) , CINAHL ( 1982 to present ) , PsychINFO ( 1967 to present ) and Clinical Trials.gov . Unpublished work will be identified by search ing two major conferences : the International Vitamin Conference , the Anxiety Disorders and Depression Conference , while grey literature will be acquired by contacting authors of included studies . We will use the r and om-effects meta- analysis to synthesize the data by pooling the results of included studies . Discussion The results of this systematic review will be helpful in clarifying the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation and providing evidence to establish guidelines for implementation of vitamin D for depression in general practice and other relevant setting s. Study registration Unique identifier : CRD42013003849 Background The prevalence of allergic diseases is approximately 10 % in infants whose parents and siblings do not have allergic diseases and 20–30 % in those with an allergic first-degree relative .  Vitamin D is involved in the regulation of the immune system and it may play a role in the development , severity and course of asthma and other allergic diseases . Objective The World Allergy Organization ( WAO ) convened a guideline panel to develop evidence -based recommendations addressing the use of vitamin D in primary prevention of allergic diseases . Methods Our WAO guideline panel identified the most relevant clinical questions and performed a systematic review of r and omized controlled trials and non-r and omized studies ( NRS ) , specifically cohort and case-control studies , of vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of allergic diseases . We also review ed the evidence about values and preferences , and re source requirements ( up to January 2015 , with an up date on January 30 , 2016 ) . We followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment , Development and Evaluation ( GRADE ) approach to develop recommendations . Results Having review ed the currently available evidence , the WAO guideline panel found no support for the hypothesis that vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of developing allergic diseases in children . The WAO guideline panel suggest not using vitamin D in pregnant women , breastfeeding mothers , or healthy term infants as a means of preventing the development of allergic diseases . This recommendation does not apply to those mothers and infants who have other indications for prophylactic or therapeutic use of vitamin D. The panel ’s recommendations are conditional and supported by very low certainty evidence . Conclusions WAO recommendations about vitamin D supplementation for the prevention of allergic diseases support parents , clinicians and other health care professionals in their decisions whether or not to use vitamin D in preventing allergic diseases in healthy , term infants Background : Asthma is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the bronchial airways . Well defined treatment options for asthma are very few . The role of vitamin D3 on asthma is still baffling . Aim : We have examined the effect of vitamin D3 supplementation in mild to moderate persistent asthma patients . Material s and Methods : We conducted an open labeled , r and omized comparative trial in 48 asthma patients . The study duration was about 90 days . The study had a run-in-period of 2 weeks . At the end of run-in-period , patients were divided into two groups : Usual care group ( n = 31 ) patients received budesonide and formoterol and intervention care group ( n = 32 ) patients received vitamin D3 supplementation along with their regular medicine . Results : The primary outcome of the study was to measure the improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second ( FEV1 ) . Patients in both groups had a significant improvement in FEV1 at the end of the study . The mean difference in percentage predicted FEV1 in usual care and intervention care group was 4.95 and 7.07 respectively . Conclusion : The study concluded that adjunctive therapy of vitamin D3 is effective in asthma patients . The present study will be an evidence based report ; however , future studies are warranted in longer duration of time to substantiate the present findings In our prior r and omized trial on preventing influenza , asthma attacks as a secondary outcome occurred less often in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group . We aim ed to clarify whether low‐dose , short‐term vitamin D supplementation , in addition to st and ard treatments , improves control of childhood asthma Introduction The extraskeletal role of vitamin D is being increasingly recognised . This has important clinical implication s , as vitamin D deficiency has reached epidemic proportions worldwide . Vitamin D has proposed anti-inflammatory properties , yet the role of vitamin D supplementation in reducing inflammation remains largely unknown . The purpose of this review is to investigate the impact of vitamin D supplementation on inflammation , and to identify relevant knowledge gaps in the field . Methods and analysis Medline , CINAHL , EMBASE and All EBM will be systematic ally search ed for r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) and systematic review s of RCTs , comparing vitamin D supplementation with placebo , usual care or other pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions . One review er will assess articles for eligibility according to prespecified selection criteria , after which 2 independent review ers will perform data extraction and quality appraisal . Meta-analyses will be conducted where appropriate . Ethics and dissemination Formal ethical approval is not required as no primary data is collected . This systematic review will identify potential clinical implication s of vitamin D deficiency and supplementation , and will be disseminated through a peer- review ed publication and at conference meetings , to inform future research on the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation for inflammation and inflammatory diseases . PROSPERO registration number CRD42016037104 Objective To define the therapeutic role of vitamin D in children with moderate to severe bronchial asthma as an adjunct to st and ard treatment . Methods Hundred asthmatic children of either sex , attending the respiratory and asthma clinic were enroled in the study . Diagnosis was made on the basis of history and clinical examination . R and omization was done using sealed opaque envelop method . In addition to the treatment as per GINA guidelines , one group received oral vitamin D3 ( Cholecalciferol ) 60,000 IU per month for 6 mo and the other group received placebo powder in the form of glucose sachet with a double blinded design . Monthly follow up of every patient was done and during every visit change in severity , level of control , Peak expiratory flow rate ( PEFR ) , steroid dosage , number of exacerbations and number of emergency visits were assessed . Results Monthly doses of 60,000 IU vitamin D significantly reduced the number of exacerbations as compared to placebo ( p = 0.011 ) . PEFR significantly increased in the treatment group ( p = 0.000 ) . Monthly doses of vitamin D significantly reduced the requirement of steroids ( p = 0.013 ) and emergency visits ( p = 0.015 ) . Control of asthma was achieved earlier in patients who received monthly vitamin D. Vitamin D significantly reduced the level of severity of asthma patients over 6 mo of treatment ( p = 0.016 ) . Conclusions Vitamin D has a definite role in the management of moderate to severe persistent bronchial asthma as an adjunct to st and ard treatment Background Vitamin D levels are alarmingly low ( < 75 nmol/L ) in 65 - 70 % of North American children older than 1 year . An increased risk of viral upper respiratory tract infections ( URTI ) , asthma-related hospitalizations and use of anti-inflammatory medication have all been linked with low vitamin D. No study has determined whether wintertime vitamin D supplementation can reduce the risk of URTI and asthma exacerbations , two of the most common and costly illnesses of early childhood . The objectives of this study are : 1 ) to compare the effect of ‘ high dose ’ ( 2000 IU/day ) vs. ‘ st and ard dose ’ ( 400 IU/day ) vitamin D supplementation in achieving reductions in laboratory confirmed URTI and asthma exacerbations during the winter in preschool-aged Canadian children ; and 2 ) to assess the effect of ‘ high dose ’ vitamin D supplementation on vitamin D serum levels and specific viruses that cause URTI . Methods / Design This study is a pragmatic r and omized controlled trial . Over 4 successive winters we will recruit 750 healthy children 1–5 years of age . Participating physicians are part of a primary healthcare research network called TARGet Kids!. Children will be r and omized to the ‘ st and ard dose ’ or ‘ high dose ’ oral supplemental vitamin D for a minimum of 4 months ( 200 children per group ) . Parents will obtain a nasal swab from their child with each URTI , report the number of asthma exacerbations and complete symptom checklists . Unscheduled physician visits for URTIs and asthma exacerbations will be recorded . By May , a blood sample will be drawn to determine vitamin D serum levels . The primary analysis will be a comparison of URTI rate between study groups using a Poisson regression model . Secondary analyses will compare  vitamin D serum levels , asthma exacerbations and the frequency of specific viral agents between groups . Discussion Identifying whether vitamin D supplementation of preschoolers can reduce wintertime viral URTIs and asthma exacerbations and what dose is optimal may reduce population wide morbidity and associated health care and societal costs . This information will assist in determining practice and health policy recommendations related to vitamin D supplementation in healthy Canadian preschoolers IMPORTANCE In asthma and other diseases , vitamin D insufficiency is associated with adverse outcomes . It is not known if supplementing inhaled corticosteroids with oral vitamin D3 improves outcomes in patients with asthma and vitamin D insufficiency . OBJECTIVE To evaluate if vitamin D supplementation would improve the clinical efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with symptomatic asthma and lower vitamin D levels . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS The VIDA ( Vitamin D Add-on Therapy Enhances Corticosteroid Responsiveness in Asthma ) r and omized , double-blind , parallel , placebo-controlled trial study ing adult patients with symptomatic asthma and a serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level of less than 30 ng/mL was conducted across 9 academic US medical centers in the National Heart , Lung , and Blood Institute 's AsthmaNet network , with enrollment starting in April 2011 and follow-up complete by January 2014 . After a run-in period that included treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid , 408 patients were r and omized . INTERVENTIONS Oral vitamin D3 ( 100,000 IU once , then 4000 IU/d for 28 weeks ; n = 201 ) or placebo ( n = 207 ) was added to inhaled ciclesonide ( 320 µg/d ) . If asthma control was achieved after 12 weeks , ciclesonide was tapered to 160 µg/d for 8 weeks , then to 80 µg/d for 8 weeks if asthma control was maintained . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was time to first asthma treatment failure ( a composite outcome of decline in lung function and increases in use of β-agonists , systemic corticosteroids , and health care ) . RESULTS Treatment with vitamin D3 did not alter the rate of first treatment failure during 28 weeks ( 28 % [ 95 % CI , 21%-34 % ] with vitamin D3 vs 29 % [ 95 % CI , 23%-35 % ] with placebo ; adjusted hazard ratio , 0.9 [ 95 % CI , 0.6 - 1.3 ] ) . Of 14 prespecified secondary outcomes , 9 were analyzed , including asthma exacerbation ; of those 9 , the only statistically significant outcome was a small difference in the overall dose of ciclesonide required to maintain asthma control ( 111.3 µg/d [ 95 % CI , 102.2 - 120.4 µg/d ] in the vitamin D3 group vs 126.2 µg/d [ 95 % CI , 117.2 - 135.3 µg/d ] in the placebo group ; difference of 14.9 µg/d [ 95 % CI , 2.1 - 27.7 µg/d ] ) . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Vitamin D3 did not reduce the rate of first treatment failure or exacerbation in adults with persistent asthma and vitamin D insufficiency . These findings do not support a strategy of therapeutic vitamin D3 supplementation in patients with symptomatic asthma . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT01248065 There is intense interest in the role of vitamin D in the development of asthma and allergies . However , studies differ on whether a higher vitamin D intake or status in pregnancy or at birth is protective against asthma and allergies . To address this uncertainty , the Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial ( VDAART ) was developed . VDAART is a r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation  in pregnant women to determine whether prenatal supplementation can prevent the development of  asthma and allergies in women 's offspring . A secondary aim is to determine whether vitamin D supplementation can prevent the development of pregnancy complications , such as preeclampsia , preterm birth , and gestational diabetes .  Women were r and omized to the treatment arm of 4000IU/day of vitamin D3 plus a daily multivitamin that contained 400IU of vitamin D3 or the placebo arm of placebo plus a multivitamin that contained 400IU daily of vitamin D3 . Women who were between the gestational ages of 10 and 18 weeks were r and omized from three clinical centers across the United States - Boston Medical Center , Washington University in St. Louis , and Kaiser Permanente Southern California Region ( San Diego , CA ) . Supplementation took place throughout pregnancy . Monthly monitoring of urinary calcium to creatinine ratio was performed in addition to medical record review for adverse events . Offspring are being evaluated quarterly through question naires and yearly during in-person visits until the 3rd birthday of the child . Ancillary studies will investigate neonatal T-regulatory cell function , maternal vaginal flora , and maternal and child intestinal flora IMPORTANCE Asthma and wheezing begin early in life , and prenatal vitamin D deficiency has been variably associated with these disorders in offspring . OBJECTIVE To determine whether prenatal vitamin D ( cholecalciferol ) supplementation can prevent  asthma or recurrent wheeze in early childhood . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS The Vitamin D Antenatal Asthma Reduction Trial was a r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trial conducted in 3 centers across the United States . Enrollment began in October 2009 and completed follow-up in January 2015 . Eight hundred eighty-one pregnant women between the ages of 18 and 39 years at high risk of having children with asthma were r and omized at 10 to 18 weeks ' gestation . Five participants were deemed ineligible shortly after r and omization and were discontinued . INTERVENTIONS Four hundred forty women were r and omized to receive daily 4000 IU vitamin D plus a prenatal vitamin containing 400 IU vitamin D , and 436 women were r and omized to receive a placebo plus a prenatal vitamin containing 400 IU vitamin D. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Co primary outcomes of ( 1 ) parental report of physician-diagnosed asthma or recurrent wheezing through 3 years of age and ( 2 ) third trimester maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels . RESULTS Eight hundred ten infants were born in the study , and 806 were included in the analyses for the 3-year outcomes . Two hundred eighteen children developed asthma or recurrent wheeze : 98 of 405 ( 24.3 % ; 95 % CI , 18.7%-28.5 % ) in the 4400-IU group vs 120 of 401 ( 30.4 % , 95 % CI , 25.7%-73.1 % ) in the 400-IU group ( hazard ratio , 0.8 ; 95 % CI , 0.6 - 1.0 ; P = .051 ) . Of the women in the 4400-IU group whose blood levels were checked , 289 ( 74.9 % ) had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of 30 ng/mL or higher by the third trimester of pregnancy compared with 133 of 391 ( 34.0 % ) in the 400-IU group ( difference , 40.9 % ; 95 % CI , 34.2%-47.5 % , P < .001 ) . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In pregnant women at risk of having a child with asthma , supplementation with 4400 IU/d of vitamin D compared with 400 IU/d significantly increased vitamin D levels in the women . The incidence of asthma and recurrent wheezing in their children at age 3 years was lower by 6.1 % , but this did not meet statistical significance ; however , the study may have been underpowered . Longer follow-up of the children is ongoing to determine whether the difference is clinical ly important . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT00920621 BACKGROUND Asthma exacerbations , most often caused by respiratory tract infections , are the leading causes of asthma morbidity and comprise a significant proportion of asthma-related costs . Vitamin D status might play a role in preventing asthma exacerbations . OBJECTIVES We sought to assess the relationship between serum vitamin D levels and subsequent severe asthma exacerbations . METHODS We measured  25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in sera collected from 1024 children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma at the time of enrollment in a multicenter clinical trial of children r and omized to receive budesonide , nedocromil , or placebo ( as-needed beta-agonists ) : the Childhood Asthma Management Program . Using multivariable modeling , we examined the relationship between baseline vitamin D levels and the odds of any hospitalization or emergency department visit over the 4 years of the trial . RESULTS Thirty-five percent of all subjects were  vitamin D insufficient , as defined by a level of 30 ng/mL or less 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Mean vitamin D levels were lowest in African American subjects and highest in white subjects . After adjusting for age , sex , body mass index , income , and treatment group , insufficient vitamin D status was associated with a higher odds of any hospitalization or emergency department visit ( odds ratio , 1.5 ; 95 % CI , 1.1 - 1.9 ; P = .01 ) . CONCLUSION Vitamin D insufficiency is common in this population of North American children with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma and is associated with higher odds of severe exacerbation over a 4-year period Rationale Asthma exacerbations are commonly precipitated by viral upper respiratory infections ( URIs ) . Vitamin D insufficiency associates with susceptibility to URI in patients with asthma . Trials of vitamin D in adults with asthma with incidence of exacerbation and URI as primary outcome are lacking . Objective To conduct a r and omised controlled trial of vitamin D3 supplementation for the prevention of asthma exacerbation and URI ( co primary outcomes ) . Measurements and methods 250 adults with asthma in London , UK were allocated to receive six 2-monthly oral doses of 3 mg vitamin D3 ( n=125 ) or placebo ( n=125 ) over 1 year . Secondary outcomes included asthma control test and St George 's Respiratory Question naire scores , fractional exhaled nitric oxide and concentrations of inflammatory markers in induced sputum . Subgroup analyses were performed to determine whether effects of supplementation were modified by baseline vitamin D status or genotype for 34 single nucleotide polymorphisms in 11 vitamin D pathway genes . Main results 206/250 participants ( 82 % ) were vitamin D insufficient at baseline . Vitamin D3 did not influence time to first severe exacerbation ( adjusted HR 1.02 , 95 % CI 0.69 to 1.53 , p=0.91 ) or first URI ( adjusted HR 0.87 , 95 % CI 0.64 to 1.16 , p=0.34 ) . No clinical ly important effect of vitamin D3 was seen on any of the secondary outcomes listed above . The influence of vitamin D3 on co primary outcomes was not modified by baseline vitamin D status or genotype . Conclusions Bolus-dose vitamin D3 supplementation did not influence time to exacerbation or URI in a population of adults with asthma with a high prevalence of baseline vitamin D insufficiency . Trial registration number NCT00978315 ( Clinical Trials.gov )
There was no significant effect for asthma symptom scores and lung function .
Conclusions and Relevance R and omized controlled trials provide some low- quality evidence to support vitamin D supplementation for the reduction of asthma exacerbations .
Importance There is growing evidence that vitamin D plays a role in the pathogenesis of asthma but it is unclear whether supplementation during childhood may improve asthma outcomes .
Objectives The objective of this systematic review and meta- analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vitamin D supplementation as a treatment or adjunct treatment for asthma .