The impact of a bariatric rehabilitation service on weight loss and psychological adjustment - study protocol Outcome reporting in bariatric surgery: an in-depth analysis to inform the development of a core outcome set, the BARIACT Study. Bariatric Surgery versus Lifestyle Interventions for Morbid Obesity—Changes in Body Weight, Risk Factors and Comorbidities at 1 Year
Background Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective form of obesity management for those whose BMI is greater than 40 ( or 35 with co morbidities ) . A minority of patients , however , either do not show the desired loss of excess weight or show weight regain by follow up . Research highlights some of the reasons for this variability , most of which centres on the absence of any psychological support with patients describing how although surgery fixes their body , psychological issues relating to dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating remain neglected . The present study aims to evaluate the impact of a health psychology led bariatric rehabilitation service ( BRS ) on patient health outcomes . The bariatric rehabilitation service will provide information , support and mentoring pre and post surgery and will address psychological issues such as dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating . The package reflects the rehabilitation services now common place for patients post heart attack and stroke which have been shown to improve patient health outcomes . Methods / Design The study is a r and omised control trial and patients will be allocated to receive either usual care or the bariatric rehabilitation service pre and post bariatric surgery . Follow up measures of weight loss and psychological issues will be taken at baseline ( 2 weeks preoperatively ) , 3 , 6 and 12 months postoperatively . The contents of the bariatric service and the follow up measures are based on previous pilot work and have been developed further by the research team working closely with two patient support groups ( BOSPA & WLSinfo ) . This study will take place in St Richard 's Hospital in Chichester in the UK . Discussion It is predicted that a bariatric rehabilitation service will improve weight loss following surgery and will also facilitate changes in other psychological variables such as quality of life , dietary control , self esteem , coping and emotional eating . This also has cost implication s for the NHS and other healthcare providers as improved effectiveness of bariatric surgery reduces the health costs of obese patients in the longer term . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov NCT01264120 Outcome reporting in  bariatric surgery  needs a core outcome set ( COS ) , an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a particular condition . The aim of this study was to summarize outcome reporting in bariatric surgery to inform the development of a COS . Outcomes reported in r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) and large non-r and omized studies identified by a systematic review were listed verbatim and categorized into domains , scrutinizing the frequency of outcome reporting and uniformity of definitions . Ninety studies ( 39 RCTs ) identified 1,088 separate outcomes , grouped into nine domains with most ( n = 920 , 85 % ) reported only once . The largest outcome domain was ' surgical complications ' , and overall , 42 % of outcomes corresponded to a theme of ' adverse events ' . Only a quarter of outcomes were defined , and where provided definitions , which were often contradictory . Percentage of excess weight loss was the main study outcome in 49 studies , but nearly 40 % of weight loss outcomes were heterogeneous , thus not comparable . Outcomes of diverse bariatric operations focus largely on adverse events . Reporting is inconsistent and ill-defined , limiting interpretation and comparison of published studies . Thus , we propose and are developing a COS for the surgical treatment of severe and complex obesity Background Few studies have looked at non-surgical alternatives for morbid obese patients . This study aims to compare 1-year weight loss and changes in risk factors and comorbidities after bariatric surgery and three conservative treatments . Methods Patients with morbid obesity ( BMI > 40 or BMI > 35 kg/m2 plus comorbidities ) on waiting list for bariatric surgery  , were non-r and omly allocated to ( A ) bariatric surgery or to one of three conservative treatments ; ( B ) residential intermittent program ; ( C ) commercial weight loss camp and ( D ) hospital outpatient program . Body weight , risk factors and comorbidities were assessed at baseline and 1 year . Results Of 206 participants , 179 completed the study . All treatments result ed in significant weight loss , but bariatric surgery ( 40 ± 14 kg , 31 ± 9 % ) led to the largest weight loss ( P < 0.0001 ) . There were no differences in weight loss between B and C ( 22 ± 13 kg , 15 ± 8 % vs. 18 ± 12 kg , 13 ± 8 % ) , but these result ed in larger weight loss compared with D ( 7 ± 10 kg , 5 ± 8 % ) . There were no differences in changes in total or LDL cholesterol , triacylglycerols or glucose between groups ; however , the increase in HDL cholesterol was significantly larger in groups A and C. There were no differences in comorbidities resolution between groups A and B , C and D combined ( except hypertension , which was better in group A ) . Conclusion In conclusion , although bariatric surgery leads to a greater weight loss at 1 year compared with conservative treatment , in patients with morbid obesity , clinical significant weight loss and similar improvements in risk factors and comorbidities resolution can also be achieved with lifestyle interventions
Conclusions The BODY-Q provides a set of independently functioning scales that measure issues important to patients who undergo weight loss .
BODY-Q scales were responsive to measuring clinical change associated with weight loss 2 years after bariatric surgery
Background Recent systematic review s have identified that current patient-reported outcome instruments have content limitations when used to measure change following bariatric surgery .
The aim of this study was to measure change after bariatric surgery using the BODY-Q , a PRO instrument design ed for weight loss and body contouring .