OARSI recommended performance-based tests to assess physical function in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Is there an evidence-based efficacy for the use of foot orthotics in knee and hip osteoarthritis? Elaboration of French clinical practice guidelines. The effects of hip muscle strengthening on knee load, pain, and function in people with knee osteoarthritis: a protocol for a randomised, single-blind controlled trial Physical function and properties of quadriceps femoris muscle in men with knee osteoarthritis. Community rehabilitation for older adults with osteoarthritis of the lower limb: a controlled clinical trial Efficacy of a progressive walking program and glucosamine sulphate supplementation on osteoarthritic symptoms of the hip and knee: a feasibility trial
OBJECTIVES To recommend a consensus-derived set of performance-based tests of physical function for use in people diagnosed with hip or knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) or following joint replacement . METHODS An international , multidisciplinary expert advisory group was established to guide the study . Potential tests for consideration in the recommended set were identified via a survey of selected experts and through a systematic review of the measurement properties for performance-based tests . A multi-phase , consensus-based approach was used to prioritize and select performance-based tests by applying decision analysis methodology ( 1000Minds software ) via online decision surveys . The recommended tests were chosen based on available measurement-property evidence , feasibility of the tests , scoring methods and expert consensus . RESULTS Consensus incorporated the opinions of 138 experienced clinicians and research ers from 16 countries . The five tests recommended by the advisory group and endorsed by Osteoarthritis Research Society International ( OARSI ) were the  30-s chair-st and test , 40 m fast-paced walk test , a stair-climb test , timed up- and -go test and 6-min walk test . The first three were recommended as the minimal core set of performance-based tests for hip or knee OA . CONCLUSION The OARSI recommended set of performance-based tests of physical function represents the tests of typical activities relevant to individuals diagnosed with hip or knee OA and following joint replacements . These tests are complementary to patient-reported measures and are recommended as prospect i ve outcome measures in future OA research and to assist decision-making in clinical practice . Further research should be directed to exp and ing the measurement-property evidence of the recommended tests OBJECTIVE To develop clinical practice guidelines for the use of foot orthotics ( FO ) in the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis . METHOD The SOFMER ( French Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Society ) methodology , associating a systematic review of the literature , input from every day clinical practice and external review by a multidisciplinary expert committee , was used . The selected analysis criteria were  pain , disability , medications used and X-ray evolution of osteoarthritis .  The recommendations are classified according to the level of proof in Grade A , B or C according to the French National Agency for Health Accreditation and Evaluation ( NAHAE ) . RESULTS In medial knee osteoarthritis , foot pronation orthotics -- when there are no contraindications -- can be proposed for their symptomatic impact , especially in the decrease of NSAIDs consumption ( Grade B ) . To this day , there is no evidence of a structural or functional impact on osteoarthritis ( Grade B ) . Outside of this specific clinical framework , there is no vali date d indication for prescribing foot orthotics in the treatment of knee or hip OA ( Grade C ) . CONCLUSION It is necessary to have further r and omized controlled trials to better define the indication of Foot orthotics ( severity of knee OA , genu varum ) , test the efficacy of other orthoses such as cushioning FO . The long-term side effects , mainly on the external femorotibial compartment could also be assessed . A medical and economical assessment of FO prescriptions is also quite necessary Background Lower limb strengthening exercises are an important component of the treatment for knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) . Strengthening the hip abductor and adductor muscles may influence joint loading and /or OA-related symptoms , but no study has evaluated these hypotheses directly . The aim of this r and omised , single-blind controlled trial is to determine whether hip abductor and adductor muscle strengthening can reduce knee load and improve pain and physical function in people with medial compartment knee OA . Methods / Design 88 participants with painful , radiographically confirmed medial compartment knee OA and varus alignment will be recruited from the community and r and omly allocated to a hip strengthening or control group using concealed allocation stratified by disease severity . The hip strengthening group will perform 6 exercises to strengthen the hip abductor and adductor muscles at home 5 times per week for 12 weeks . They will consult with a physiotherapist on 7 occasions to be taught the exercises and progress exercise resistance . The control group will be requested to continue with their usual care . Blinded follow up assessment will be conducted at 12 weeks after r and omisation . The primary outcome measure is the change in the peak external knee adduction moment measured during walking . Question naires will assess changes in pain and physical function as well as overall perceived rating of change . An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed using linear regression modelling and adjusting for baseline outcome values and other demographic characteristics . Discussion Results from this trial will contribute to the evidence regarding the effect of hip strengthening on knee loads and symptoms in people with medial compartment knee OA . If shown to reduce the knee adduction moment , hip strengthening has the potential to slow disease progression . Trial Registration Australia New Zeal and Clinical Trials Registry OBJECTIVES To examine the objective physical function of the lower extremities , to measure the properties of quadriceps femoris muscle ( QFM ) , and to assess subjective disabilities in men with knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) and to compare the results with those obtained from age- and sex-matched control subjects . DESIGN Cross-sectional study . SETTING Rehabilitation clinic in a university hospital . PARTICIPANTS Male volunteers ( n=54 ) ( age range , 50 - 69y ) with knee OA and r and omly selected healthy , age- and sex-matched control subjects ( n=53 ) . INTERVENTIONS Not applicable . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Physical function evaluated with a test battery including the QFM composition measurement , the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) , and the R AND 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey , version 1.0 .  RESULTS Knee OA patients had 13 % to 26 % poorer ( P range , .050-.001 ) physical function and muscle strength compared with the controls . There were also significant differences in QFM composition . WOMAC ( P range , .050-.001 ) and muscle strength ( P<.001 ) associated with physical function tests , but subjective pain correlated with neither physical function nor muscle strength in knee OA patients . The radiographic knee OA grade did not have any significant effect on physical function , but passive knee motion , knee extension strength , and WOMAC were related to the severity of the disease ( P<.05 ) . CONCLUSIONS The patients with knee OA exhibited impaired physical function and muscle strength and QFM composition compared with healthy controls . The severity of radiographic knee OA clearly had adverse effects on functional ability at the later stages of the disease . The results highlight the effect of QFM strength on physical function as well as the importance of patient 's subjective and objective physical function when deciding on knee OA treatment policy Objective : To examine the effectiveness of a 12-month community-based water exercise programme on measures of self-reported health and physical function in people aged over 60 years old with knee-hip osteoarthritis ( OA ) . Design : A quasi-experimental design consisting of an exercise group and an age-matched control group . Setting : Public community swimming pool in Sheffield , UK . Subjects : One hundred and six community-dwelling sedentary older people , with confirmed knee-hip osteoarthritis , enrolled in an experimental controlled trial for 12 months . Sixty-six subjects in the exercise group were offered a water-exercise programme .  Forty age-matched , nonexercising , ‘ control ’ subjects received monthly education material and quarterly telephone calls . Interventions : Participants in the exercise group were asked to attend two exercise sessions a week of 1 hour duration led by specially trained swimming instructors . Main measures : Primary outcome measure was the disease-specific Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) . Secondary outcomes included a battery of performance-based physical function tests . Results : Adherence to exercise averaged 70 % ( ±14 % ) over the year : 77 % of the exercising subjects and 89 % control subjects completed both pre- and post- outcome measures . After one year , participants in the exercise group experienced a significant improvement in physical function ( 4.0 ± 9.1 versus -0.4 ± 7.3 units ; 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 0.96–7.96 , p < 0.05 ) and reduction in the perception of pain ( 1.3 ± 3.7 versus 0.2 ± 2.5 units ; 95 % CI -0.19 - 2.52 , p < 0.05 ) compared with the control group , as measured by the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index . In addition , the exercise group performed significantly better in the ascending and descending stairs tests ( p < 0.05 ) , had significantly greater improvements in knee range of movement ( p < 0.01 ) and hip range of movements ( p < 0.005 ) . There were no significant differences in the two groups for quadriceps muscle strength and psychosocial well-being ( Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 question naire ) . Conclusions : Older people with knee/hip osteoarthritis gained modest improvements in measures of physical function , pain , general mobility and flexibility after participating in 12 months of community-based water exercise Introduction Management of osteoarthritis ( OA ) includes the use of non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapies . Although walking is commonly recommended for reducing pain and increasing physical function in people with OA , glucosamine sulphate has also been used to alleviate pain and slow the progression of OA . This study evaluated the effects of a progressive walking program and glucosamine sulphate intake on OA symptoms and physical activity participation in people with mild to moderate hip or knee OA . Methods Thirty-six low active participants ( aged 42 to 73 years ) were provided with 1500 mg glucosamine sulphate per day for 6 weeks , after which they began a 12-week progressive walking program , while continuing to take glucosamine . They were r and omized to walk 3 or 5 days per week and given a pedometer to monitor step counts . For both groups , step level of walking was gradually increased to 3000 steps/day during the first 6 weeks of walking , and to 6000 steps/day for the next 6 weeks . Primary outcomes included physical activity levels , physical function ( self-paced step test ) , and the WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index for pain , stiffness and physical function . Assessment s were conducted at baseline and at 6- , 12- , 18- , and 24-week follow-ups . The Mann Whitney Test was used to examine differences in outcome measures between groups at each assessment , and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was used to examine differences in outcome measures between assessment s. Results During the first 6 weeks of the study ( glucosamine supplementation only ) , physical activity levels , physical function , and total WOMAC scores improved ( P < 0.05 ) . Between the start of the walking program ( Week 6 ) and the final follow-up ( Week 24 ) , further improvements were seen in these outcomes ( P < 0.05 ) although most improvements were seen between Weeks 6 and 12 . No significant differences were found between walking groups . Conclusions In people with hip or knee OA , walking a minimum of 3000 steps ( ~30 minutes ) , at least 3 days/week , in combination with glucosamine sulphate , may reduce OA symptoms . A more robust study with a larger sample is needed to support these preliminary findings .Trial Registration Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000159459
On balance of the limited evidence , the 40 m self-paced test was the best rated walk test , the 30 s-chair st and test and timed up and go test were the best rated sit to st and tests , and the Stratford battery , Physical Activity Restrictions and Functional Assessment System were the best rated multi-activity measures .
OBJECTIVES To systematic ally review the measurement properties of performance-based measures to assess physical function in people with hip and /or knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) .