A systematic review of the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care on readmission rates for patients with heart failure The effectiveness of telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care in decreasing readmission rate in patients with heart failure: a systematic review Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition -- Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial. A remote monitoring and telephone nurse coaching intervention to reduce readmissions among patients with heart failure: study protocol for the Better Effectiveness After Transition - Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) randomized controlled trial The effectiveness of yoga to prevent diabetes mellitus type 2 Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: past, present and future? Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review. Protocol for an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to reduce unscheduled hospital admissions among adults Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review Some problems with Cochrane reviews of diet and chronic disease Protocol for a systematic review of psychological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors
Background  Readmission rates for patients with heart failure are a major concern for hospitals worldwide . The importance of patient education and a structured care plan to ease the transition from hospital to home has been the focus of many intervention strategies to reduce readmission rates . The use of transitioning of care plans is believed to improve medication reconciliation , communication , patient education , and follow‐up . To date , the evidence has not been systematic ally evaluated to support the effectiveness of a nurse coordinated transitioning of care for patients with heart failure in reducing readmission rates . Objective The objective of the systematic review was to identify the best available evidence on the effectiveness of nurse coordinated transitioning of care between hospital and home on hospital readmission rates for all causes in adult patients hospitalised with heart failure . Search strategy The search strategy aim ed to find both published and unpublished studies in the English language from January 1975 through July 2010 . A search of MEDLINE , CINAHL , PsycINFO , Health source Nursing/academic edition , EMBASE , the Cochrane Library , and the Joanna Briggs Institute Library of Systematic Review s was conducted followed by a reference search of relevant studies . The initial key words search ed were : heart failure , readmission , and transitional care . Inclusion criteria R and omised controlled trials that evaluated the effect of nurse coordinated transitioning of care from hospital to home in adult patients with heart failure on  readmission  rates were selected . The outcome was defined as hospital readmissions for all causes following an initial admission for heart failure . Data collection and analysis Studies selected for retrieval were critically evaluated by two independent review ers for method ological validity using st and ardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument ( JBI‐MAStARI ) . Data were extracted and analysed using the JBI‐MAStARI program . Results A total of 16 r and omised controlled studies were included . Ten of the 16 studies included in the review show that a nurse led transitioning of care intervention can reduce the rate of readmission for patients with heart failure . Interventions utilising home visits , or home visits coupled with telephone follow‐up , show a more favourable reduction in readmission rates . Conclusions Reduced readmissions occur when transitioning of care interventions are carried out by a heart failure trained nurse who conducts at least one home visit and follows the patient at least weekly for a minimum of 30 days post discharge with either additional home visits or telephone contact . Implication s for practice This review supports the development of a nurse coordinated transitioning of care plan which will require improvements in communication , in addition to changes in health policy and payment systems that align incentives and performance measures in caring for patients with heart failure . Implication s for research Future research should evaluate the effect of the intensity and duration of the transitioning of care intervention on readmission rates in a large r and omised control trial on an adult population with heart failure to determine the ideal frequency and duration of the post discharge interventions Background The importance of comprehensive discharge planning plus post discharge support intervention studies have been advocated for patients with heart failure .  Telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care was reported as a significant nursing care approach that is believed to promote continuity of care . However , there is a lack of systematic ally examined evidence to support the effectiveness of nurse‐led telephone‐based post‐discharge care for the heart failure patients . Objective The purpose of this study was to examine the best available evidence to determine the effectiveness of telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care of patient with HF and to quantify the effect on all‐cause readmission rates of these patients . Search strategy A thorough search of published and unpublished literature was conducted from 1990 to 2009 . First , computer data bases such as CINAHL , MEDLINE , COCHRANE EMBASE , and Dissertation Abstract s International were included and then , reference search was conducted with relevant studies . Initial keywords were “ readmission , ” “ heart failure , ” “ * tele * ” , “ nurs * , “ post‐discharge ” , telephone‐based . ” Selection criteria R and omized controlled trial studies using the telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care was selected . Outcome was defined as frequency of unplanned HF symptoms associated all‐cause hospital readmission rate during the 6 months after discharge . Data collection and analysis Included studies were critically evaluated for method ological quality by independent two review ers . Data were extracted and then analyzed using the JBI‐MASTARI and the RevMan 5 program . Main results A total of 10 r and omized controlled trial studies were included for this study . The study result showed that telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care was a significant intervention especially decreasing hospital readmission rate among HF patients . Conclusion The findings of this review suggest a positive effect of telephone‐based post‐discharge nursing care and that it is an effective intervention in decreasing readmission rate among HF patients . Implication s for practice / research The results of this systematic review indicate the need for well design ed studies that examine other aspects of post‐discharge nursing telephone interventions to decrease hospital readmission rate among HF patients including : cost‐effectiveness , feasibility and appropriateness IMPORTANCE It remains unclear whether telemonitoring approaches provide benefits for patients with heart failure ( HF ) after hospitalization . OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of a care transition intervention using remote patient monitoring in reducing 180-day all-cause readmissions among a broad population of older adults hospitalized with HF . DESIGN , SETTING , AND PARTICIPANTS We r and omized 1437 patients hospitalized for HF between October 12 , 2011 , and September 30 , 2013 , to the intervention arm ( 715 patients ) or to the usual care arm ( 722 patients ) of the Better Effectiveness After Transition-Heart Failure ( BEAT-HF ) study and observed them for 180 days . The date s of our study analysis were March 30 , 2014 , to October 1 , 2015 . The setting was 6 academic medical centers in California . Participants were hospitalized individuals 50 years or older who received active treatment for decompensated HF . INTERVENTIONS The intervention combined health coaching telephone calls and telemonitoring . Telemonitoring used electronic equipment that collected daily information about blood pressure , heart rate , symptoms , and weight . Central ized registered nurses conducted telemonitoring review s , protocol ized actions , and telephone calls . MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was readmission for any cause within 180 days after discharge . Secondary outcomes were all-cause readmission within 30 days , all-cause mortality at 30 and 180 days , and quality of life at 30 and 180 days . RESULTS Among 1437 participants , the median age was 73 years . Overall , 46.2 % ( 664 of 1437 ) were female , and 22.0 % ( 316 of 1437 ) were African American . The intervention and usual care groups did not differ significantly in readmissions for any cause 180 days after discharge , which occurred in 50.8 % ( 363 of 715 ) and 49.2 % ( 355 of 722 ) of patients , respectively ( adjusted hazard ratio , 1.03 ; 95 % CI , 0.88 - 1.20 ; P = .74 ) . In secondary analyses , there were no significant differences in 30-day readmission or 180-day mortality , but there was a significant difference in 180-day quality of life between the intervention and usual care groups . No adverse events were reported . CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among patients hospitalized for HF , combined health coaching telephone calls and telemonitoring did not reduce 180-day readmissions . TRIAL REGISTRATION clinical trials.gov Identifier : NCT01360203 Background Heart failure is a prevalent health problem associated with costly hospital readmissions . Transitional care programs have been shown to reduce readmissions but are costly to implement . Evidence regarding the effectiveness of telemonitoring in managing the care of this chronic condition is mixed . The objective of this r and omized controlled comparative effectiveness study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a care transition intervention that includes pre-discharge education about heart failure and post-discharge telephone nurse coaching combined with home telemonitoring of weight , blood pressure , heart rate , and symptoms in reducing all-cause 180-day hospital readmissions for older adults hospitalized with heart failure . Methods / Design A multi-center , r and omized controlled trial is being conducted at six academic health systems in California . A total of 1,500 patients aged 50 years and older will be enrolled during a hospitalization for treatment of heart failure . Patients in the intervention group will receive intensive patient education using the ‘ teach-back ’ method and receive instruction in using the telemonitoring equipment . Following hospital discharge , they will receive a series of nine scheduled health coaching telephone calls over 6 months from nurses located in a central ized call center . The nurses also will call patients and patients ’ physicians in response to alerts generated by the telemonitoring system , based on predetermined parameters . The primary outcome is readmission for any cause within 180 days . Secondary outcomes include 30-day readmission , mortality , hospital days , emergency department ( ED ) visits , hospital cost , and health-related quality of life . Discussion BEAT-HF is one of the largest r and omized controlled trials of telemonitoring in patients with heart failure , and the first explicitly to adapt the care transition approach and combine it with remote telemonitoring . The study population also includes patients with a wide range of demographic and socioeconomic characteristics . Once completed , the study will be a rich re source of information on how best to use remote technology in the care management of patients with chronic heart failure . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov # NCT01360203 Background : Type 2 diabetes mellitus ( T2DM ) is becoming a leading problem worldwide . Emerging reports reveal alarming evidence of increasing prevalence of T2DM that has reached p and emic levels . Despite the significant incidence , there are limited reliable data re sources and comprehensive systematic review and meta- analysis on the effects of yoga on people who are a prediabetic or high risk for developing T2DM . Objective : The objective of this protocol is to conduct a full-scale systematic review and meta-analyses on the effects of yoga on people who are prediabetes or high risk of developing T2DM . Methods : The articles enrolled in the study will be retrieved from the online data bases between 2002 and the date the search es are executed . The search es will be repeated just before the final analyses and further relevant studies for inclusion . We will conduct a bibliographic search in data bases : Medline / PubMed , Scopus , Cochrane Library , EBSCO , and IndMED using keywords including prediabetes state , high risk for diabetes , metabolic syndrome , and yoga . A defined search strategy will be implemented along with selection criteria to obtain full-text articles of relevant studies . This study protocol was prepared according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta- Analysis for Protocol s 2015 guidelines . There will be no language restrictions . Ethics and dissemination : The proposed study will be based on published studies and publicly available anonymized data without directly involving human participants and therefore requires neither formal human ethical review nor approval by a human research ethics committee . We published an outline of the protocol in the International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) in 2018 . We plan to disseminate the findings of this systematic review and meta- analysis through publication in a peer- review ed journal and presentation at relevant conference proceedings . In addition , we believe the results of the systematic review will have implication s for policy and practice . We will prepare policymaker summary using a vali date d format , disseminate through social media and email discussion groups . Review registration number : PROSPERO registration number CRD The Cochrane Collaboration was established in 1993 , following the opening of the UK Cochrane Centre in 1992 , at a time when search ing for studies for inclusion in systematic review s was not well-developed . Review authors largely conducted their own search es or depended on medical librarians , who often possessed limited awareness and experience of systematic review s. Guidance on the conduct and reporting of search es was limited . When work began to identify reports of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) for inclusion in Cochrane Review s in 1992 , there were only approximately 20,000 reports indexed as RCTs in MEDLINE and none indexed as RCTs in Embase . No search filters had been developed with the aim of identifying all RCTs in MEDLINE or other major data bases . This presented The Cochrane Collaboration with a considerable challenge in identifying relevant studies .Over time , the number of studies indexed as RCTs in the major data bases has grown considerably and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL ) has become the best single source of published controlled trials , with approximately 700,000 records , including records identified by the Collaboration from Embase and MEDLINE . Search filters for various study types , including systematic review s and the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategies for RCTs , have been developed . There have been considerable advances in the evidence base for method ological aspects of information retrieval . The Cochrane H and book for Systematic Review s of Interventions now provides detailed guidance on the conduct and reporting of search es . Initiatives across The Cochrane Collaboration to improve the quality inter alia of information retrieval include : the recently introduced Method ological Expectations for Cochrane Intervention Review s ( MECIR ) programme , which stipulates ' m and atory ’ and ' highly desirable ’ st and ards for various aspects of review conduct and reporting including search ing , the development of St and ard Training Material s for Cochrane Review s and work on peer review of electronic search strategies . Almost all Cochrane Review Groups and some Cochrane Centres and Fields now have a Trials Search Co-ordinator responsible for study identification and medical librarians and other information specialists are increasingly experienced in search ing for studies for systematic review s. Prospect i ve registration of clinical trials is increasing and search ing trials registers is now m and atory for Cochrane Review s , where relevant . Portals such as the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform ( ICTRP ) are likely to become increasingly attractive , given concerns about the number of trials which may not be registered and /or published . The importance of access to information from regulatory and reimbursement agencies is likely to increase . Cross- data base search ing , gateways or portals and improved access to full-text data bases will impact on how search es are conducted and reported , as will services such as Google Scholar , Scopus and Web of Science . Technologies such as textual analysis , semantic analysis , text mining and data linkage will have a major impact on the search process but efficient and effective updating of review s may remain a challenge . In twenty years ’ time , we envisage that the impact of universal social networking , as well as national and international legislation , will mean that all trials involving humans will be registered at inception and detailed trial results will be routinely available to all . Challenges will remain , however , to ensure the discoverability of relevant information in diverse and often complex sources and the availability of meta data to provide the most efficient access to information . We envisage an ongoing role for information professionals as experts in identifying new re sources , research ing efficient ways to link or mine them for relevant data and managing their content for the efficient production of systematic review BACKGROUND Systematic review s may be compromised by selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses . Selective inclusion occurs when there are multiple effect estimates in a trial report that could be included in a particular meta- analysis ( e.g. from multiple measurement scales and time points ) and the choice of effect estimate to include in the meta- analysis is based on the results ( e.g. statistical significance , magnitude or direction of effect ) . Selective reporting occurs when the reporting of a subset of outcomes and analyses in the systematic review is based on the results ( e.g. a protocol -defined outcome is omitted from the published systematic review ) . OBJECTIVES To summarise the characteristics and synthesis e the results of empirical studies that have investigated the prevalence of selective inclusion or reporting in systematic review s of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) , investigated the factors ( e.g. statistical significance or direction of effect ) associated with the prevalence and quantified the bias . SEARCH METHODS We search ed the Cochrane Methodology Register ( to July 2012 ) , Ovid MEDLINE , Ovid EMBASE , Ovid PsycINFO and ISI Web of Science ( each up to May 2013 ) , and the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) Effective Healthcare Program 's Scientific Re source Center ( SRC ) Methods Library ( to June 2013 ) . We also search ed the abstract books of the 2011 and 2012 Cochrane Colloquia and the article alerts for method ological work in research synthesis published from 2009 to 2011 and compiled in Research Synthesis Methods . SELECTION CRITERIA We included both published and unpublished empirical studies that investigated the prevalence and factors associated with selective inclusion or reporting , or both , in systematic review s of RCTs of healthcare interventions . We included empirical studies assessing any type of selective inclusion or reporting , such as investigations of how frequently RCT outcome data is selectively included in systematic review s based on the results , outcomes and analyses are discrepant between protocol and published review or non-significant outcomes are partially reported in the full text or summary within systematic review s. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently selected empirical studies for inclusion , extracted the data and performed a risk of bias assessment . A third review author resolved any disagreements about inclusion or exclusion of empirical studies , data extraction and risk of bias . We contacted authors of included studies for additional unpublished data . Primary outcomes included overall prevalence of selective inclusion or reporting , association between selective inclusion or reporting and the statistical significance of the effect estimate , and association between selective inclusion or reporting and the direction of the effect estimate . We combined prevalence estimates and risk ratios ( RRs ) using a r and om-effects meta- analysis model . MAIN RESULTS Seven studies met the inclusion criteria . No studies had investigated selective inclusion of results in systematic review s , or discrepancies in outcomes and analyses between systematic review registry entries and published systematic review s. Based on a meta- analysis of four studies ( including 485 Cochrane Review s ) , 38 % ( 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 23 % to 54 % ) of systematic review s added , omitted , up grade d or down grade d at least one outcome between the protocol and published systematic review . The association between statistical significance and discrepant outcome reporting between protocol and published systematic review was uncertain . The meta-analytic estimate suggested an increased risk of adding or upgrading ( i.e. changing a secondary outcome to primary ) when the outcome was statistically significant , although the 95 % CI included no association and a decreased risk as plausible estimates ( RR 1.43 , 95 % CI 0.71 to 2.85 ; two studies , n = 552 meta-analyses ) . Also , the meta-analytic estimate suggested an increased risk of downgrading ( i.e. changing a primary outcome to secondary ) when the outcome was statistically significant , although the 95 % CI included no association and a decreased risk as plausible estimates ( RR 1.26 , 95 % CI 0.60 to 2.62 ; two studies , n = 484 meta-analyses ) . None of the included studies had investigated whether the association between statistical significance and adding , upgrading or downgrading of outcomes was modified by the type of comparison , direction of effect or type of outcome ; or whether there is an association between direction of the effect estimate and discrepant outcome reporting . Several secondary outcomes were reported in the included studies . Two studies found that reasons for discrepant outcome reporting were infrequently reported in published systematic review s ( 6 % in one study and 22 % in the other ) . One study ( including 62 Cochrane Review s ) found that 32 % ( 95 % CI 21 % to 45 % ) of systematic review s did not report all primary outcomes in the abstract . Another study ( including 64 Cochrane and 118 non-Cochrane review s ) found that statistically significant primary outcomes were more likely to be completely reported in the systematic review abstract than non-significant primary outcomes ( RR 2.66 , 95 % CI 1.81 to 3.90 ) . None of the studies included systematic review s published after 2009 when reporting st and ards for systematic review s ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review s and Meta-Analyses ( PRISMA ) Statement , and Method ological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Review s ( MECIR ) ) were disseminated , so the results might not be generalisable to more recent systematic review s. AUTHORS ' CONCLUSIONS Discrepant outcome reporting between the protocol and published systematic review is fairly common , although the association between statistical significance and discrepant outcome reporting is uncertain . Complete reporting of outcomes in systematic review abstract s is associated with statistical significance of the results for those outcomes . Systematic review outcomes and analysis plans should be specified prior to seeing the results of included studies to minimise post-hoc decisions that may be based on the observed results . Modifications that occur once the review has commenced , along with their justification , should be clearly reported . Effect estimates and CIs should be reported for all systematic review outcomes regardless of the results . The lack of research on selective inclusion of results in systematic review s needs to be addressed and studies that avoid the method ological weaknesses of existing research are also needed OBJECTIVES The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to provide support for people living with dementia in the community . INCLUSION CRITERIA Types of participants Adult caregivers who provide support for people with dementia living in the community ( non-institutional care).Types of interventions Interventions design ed to support caregivers in their role such as skills training , education to assist in caring for a person living with dementia and support groups/programs . Interventions of formal approaches to care design ed to support caregivers in their role , care planning , case management and specially design ated members of the healthcare team - for example dementia nurse specialist or volunteers trained in caring for someone with dementia . Types of studies This review considered any meta-analyses , systematic review s , r and omised control trials , quasi-experimental studies , cohort studies , case control studies and observational studies without control groups that addressed the effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to provide support for people living with dementia in the community . SEARCH STRATEGY The search sought to identify published studies from 2000 to 2005 through the use of electronic data bases . Only studies in English were considered for inclusion . The initial search was conducted of the data bases , CINAHL , MEDLINE and PsychINFO using search strategies adapted from the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group . A second more extensive search was then conducted using the appropriate Medical Subject Headings ( MeSH ) and keywords for other available data bases . Finally , h and search ing of reference lists of articles retrieved and of core dementia , geriatric and psycho geriatric journals was undertaken . ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY Method ological quality of each of the articles was assessed by two independent review ers using appraisal checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and based on the work of the Cochrane Collaboration and Centre for Review s and Dissemination . DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS St and ardised mean differences or weighted mean differences and their 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for each included study reported in the meta- analysis . Results from comparable groups of studies were pooled in statistical meta- analysis using Review Manager Software from the Cochrane Collaboration . Heterogeneity between combined studies was tested using st and ard chi-square test . Where statistical pooling was not appropriate or possible , the findings are summarised in narrative form . RESULTS A comprehensive search of relevant data bases , h and search ing and cross referencing found 685 articles that were assessed for relevance to the review . Eighty-five papers appeared to meet the inclusion criteria based on title and abstract , and the full paper was retrieved . Of the 85 full papers review ed , 40 were accepted for inclusion , three were systematic review s , three were meta- analysis , and the remaining 34 were r and omised controlled trials . For the r and omised controlled trials that were able to be included in a meta- analysis , st and ardised mean differences or weighted mean differences and their 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for each . Results from comparable groups of studies were pooled in statistical meta- analysis using Review Manager Software and heterogeneity between combined studies was assessed by using the chi-square test . Where statistical pooling was not appropriate or possible , the findings are summarised in narrative form . The results are discussed in two main sections . Firstly it was possible to assess the effectiveness of different types of caregiver interventions on the outcome categories of depression , health , subjective well-being , self-efficacy and burden . Secondly , results are reported by main outcome category . For each of these sections , meta- analysis was conducted where it was possible ; otherwise , a narrative summary describes the findings . EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTION TYPE Four categories of intervention were included in the review - psycho-educational , support , multi-component and other . Psycho-educational Thirteen studies used  psycho-educational interventions  , and all but one showed positive results across a range of outcomes . Eight studies were entered in a meta- analysis . No significant impact of psycho-educational interventions was found for the outcome categories of subjective well-being , self-efficacy or health . However , small but significant results were found for the categories of depression and burden . Support Seven studies discussed support only interventions and two of these showed significant results . These two studies were suitable for meta- analysis and demonstrated a small but significant improvement on caregiver burden . Multi-component Twelve of the studies report multi-component interventions and 10 of these report significant outcomes across a broad range of outcome measures including self-efficacy , depression , subjective well-being and burden . Unfortunately because of the heterogeneity of study design s and outcome measures , no meta- analysis was possible . Other interventions Other interventions included the use of exercise or nutrition which result ed in improvements in psychological distress and health benefits . Case management and a computer aided support intervention provided mixed results . One cognitive behavioural therapy study reported a reduction in anxiety and positive impacts on patient behaviour . EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERVENTIONS USING SPECIFIC OUTCOME CATEGORIES In addition to analysis by type of intervention it was possible to analyse results based on some outcome categories that were used across the studies . In particular the impact of interventions on caregiver depression was available for meta- analysis from eight studies . This indicated that multi-component and psycho-educational interventions showed a small but significant positive effect on caregiver depression . Five studies using the outcome category of caregiver burden  were entered into a meta- analysis and findings indicated that there were no significant effects of any of interventions . No meta- analysis was possible for the outcome categories of health , self-efficacy or subjective well-being . IMPLICATION S FOR PRACTICE From this review there is evidence to support the use of well- design ed psycho-educational or multi-component interventions for caregivers of people with dementia who live in the community . Factors that appear to positively contribute to effective interventions are those which : Factors which do not appear to have benefit in interventions are those which Introduction Unscheduled hospital admissions are an increasing burden on health systems worldwide . To date , initiatives to reduce admissions have had limited success as it is unclear which strategies effectively reduce admissions and are supported by a strong evidence -base . Therefore , we will conduct an overview to find , assess and summarise all published peer- review ed systematic review s of r and omised controlled trials that examine the effect of an intervention on  unplanned admissions among adults . Methods and analysis This is a protocol for a systematic overview of review s. We will search four data bases : Ovid MEDLINE , PubMed , Cochrane Data base of Systematic Review s and the Cochrane Data base of Abstract s of Review s of Effects . We will consider systematic review s and meta-analyses of r and omised controlled trials in adults ( ≥16 years old ) evaluating the effect of any intervention on unscheduled hospital admissions including those to treat , monitor , diagnose or prevent a health problem . We will only include review s that identified unscheduled hospitalisations as a prespecified outcome . Two authors will independently screen articles for inclusion using a priori criteria . We will assess the quality of included review s and extract ratings of the quality of evidence from within each review . We will create a hierarchical list of interventions based on estimates of absolute admission reductions and the quality of the evidence . Presentation of results will align with guidelines in the Cochrane H and book of Systematic Review s of Interventions and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta- Analysis statement . Ethics and dissemination Ethics approval is not required . We will su bmi t the results of this study for peer- review publication . The results will inform future research and could be used by healthcare managers , administrators and policymakers to guide re source allocation decisions and inform local implementation and optimisation of interventions to reduce unscheduled hospital admissions Objectives The objective of this review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to provide support for people living with dementia in the community . Inclusion criteria Types of participants Adult caregivers who provide support for people with dementia living in the community ( non‐institutional care ) . Types of interventions Interventions design ed to support caregivers in their role such as skills training , education to assist in caring for a person living with dementia and support groups/programs . Interventions of formal approaches to care design ed to support caregivers in their role , care planning , case management and specially design ated members of the healthcare team ‐ for example dementia nurse specialist or volunteers trained in caring for someone with dementia . Types of studies This review considered any meta‐analyses , systematic review s , r and omised control trials , quasi‐experimental studies , cohort studies , case control studies and observational studies without control groups that addressed the effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to provide support for people living with dementia in the community . Search strategy The search sought to identify published studies from 2000 to 2005 through the use of electronic data bases . Only studies in English were considered for inclusion . The initial search was conducted of the data bases , CINAHL , MEDLINE and PsychINFO using search strategies adapted from the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group . A second more extensive search was then conducted using the appropriate Medical Subject Headings ( MeSH ) and keywords for other available data bases . Finally , h and search ing of reference lists of articles retrieved and of core dementia , geriatric and psycho geriatric journals was undertaken . Assessment of quality Method ological quality of each of the articles was assessed by two independent review ers using appraisal checklist developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute and based on the work of the Cochrane Collaboration and Centre for Review s and Dissemination . Data collection and analysis St and ardised mean differences or weighted mean differences and their 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for each included study reported in the meta‐ analysis . Results from comparable groups of studies were pooled in statistical meta‐ analysis using Review Manager Software from the Cochrane Collaboration . Heterogeneity between combined studies was tested using st and ard chi‐square test . Where statistical pooling was not appropriate or possible , the findings are summarised in narrative form . Results A comprehensive search of relevant data bases , h and search ing and cross referencing found 685 articles that were assessed for relevance to the review . Eighty‐five papers appeared to meet the inclusion criteria based on title and abstract , and the full paper was retrieved . Of the 85 full papers review ed , 40 were accepted for inclusion , three were systematic review s , three were meta‐ analysis , and the remaining 34 were r and omised controlled trials . For the r and omised controlled trials that were able to be included in a meta‐ analysis , st and ardised mean differences or weighted mean differences and their 95 % confidence intervals were calculated for each . Results from comparable groups of studies were pooled in statistical meta‐ analysis using Review Manager Software and heterogeneity between combined studies was assessed by using the chi‐square test . Where statistical pooling was not appropriate or possible , the findings are summarised in narrative form . The results are discussed in two main sections . Firstly it was possible to assess the effectiveness of different types of caregiver interventions on the outcome categories of depression , health , subjective well‐being , self‐efficacy and burden . Secondly , results are reported by main outcome category . For each of these sections , meta‐ analysis was conducted where it was possible ; otherwise , a narrative summary describes the findings . Effectiveness of intervention type Four categories of intervention were included in the review ‐ psycho‐educational , support , multi‐component and other . Psycho‐educational Thirteen studies used  psycho‐educational interventions , and all but one showed positive results across a range of outcomes . Eight studies were entered in a meta‐ analysis . No significant impact of psycho‐educational interventions was found for the outcome categories of subjective well‐being , self‐efficacy or health . However , small but significant results were found for the categories of depression and burden . Support Seven studies discussed support only interventions and two of these showed significant results . These two studies were suitable for meta‐ analysis and demonstrated a small but significant improvement on caregiver burden . Multi‐component Twelve of the studies report multi‐component interventions and 10 of these report significant outcomes across a broad range of outcome measures including self‐efficacy , depression , subjective well‐being and burden . Unfortunately because of the heterogeneity of study design s and outcome measures , no meta‐ analysis was possible . Other interventions Other interventions included the use of exercise or nutrition which result ed in improvements in psychological distress and health benefits .  Case management and a computer aided support intervention provided mixed results . One cognitive behavioural therapy study reported a reduction in anxiety and positive impacts on patient behaviour . Effectiveness of interventions using specific outcome categories In addition to analysis by type of intervention it was possible to analyse results based on some outcome categories that were used across the studies . In particular the impact of interventions on  caregiver depression was available for meta‐ analysis from eight studies . This indicated that multi‐component and psycho‐educational interventions showed a small but significant positive effect on caregiver depression . Five studies using the outcome category of caregiver burden  were entered into a meta‐ analysis and findings indicated that there were no significant effects of any of interventions . No meta‐ analysis was possible for the outcome categories of health , self‐efficacy or subjective well‐being . Implication s for practice From this review there is evidence to support the use of well‐ design ed psycho‐educational or multi‐component interventions for caregivers of people with dementia who live in the community . Factors that appear to positively contribute to effective interventions are those which : Provide opportunities within the intervention for the person with dementia as well as the caregiver to be involved Encourage active participation in educational interventions for caregivers Offer individualised programs rather than group sessions Provide information on an ongoing basis , with specific information about services and coaching regarding their new role Target the care recipient particularly by reduction in behaviours Factors which do not appear to have benefit in interventions are those which : Simply refer caregivers to support groups Only provide self help material s Only offer peer The sum of evidence -based nutrition has to be more than a Cochrane-type meta- analysis of r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) . Most of the evidence base in nutrition is observational , especially cohort studies . RCTs of diet change through to disease outcome are uncommon and the change has usually been addition or removal of only a single food component . Trials with whole diets through to disease outcome are rare and dietary changes made by individuals are unlikely to be an exact copy of the prescription . It is hard to even imagine a trial in which half ( r and omised ) of a large group of middle-aged people agree to avoid vegetables for 5 y and be followed up to see who will develop cancer . Most of the USA 's health cl aims , permitted by the Food and Drug Administration , are not supported by RCTs . But where controlled trials of nutritional change and disease outcome have been achieved , they must be review ed very carefully . Two Cochrane review s on diet and cardiovascular disease ( CVD ) , published in the widely read British Medical Journal ( BMJ ) , were criticised after their publication and the conclusions have not been subsequently adopted by expert committees . The first of these review s was ‘ Dietary fat and prevention of CVD : a systematic review ’ . The second was ‘ Systematic review of long term effects of advice to reduce dietary salt in adults ’ . A critique of these two Cochrane review s is presented here as a contribution to our discussion of the potential of Cochrane methodology to the reliability of knowledge about diet and disease Background Fatigue is a common symptom in cancer patients that can persist beyond the curative treatment phase . Some evidence has been reported for interventions for fatigue during active treatment . However , to date , there is no systematic review on psychological interventions for fatigue after the completion of curative treatment for cancer . This is a protocol for a systematic review that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of psychological interventions for cancer-related fatigue in post-treatment cancer survivors . This systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospect i ve Register of Systematic Review s ( PROSPERO ) data base . Methods / design We will search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials ( CENTRAL ; The Cochrane Library ) , PubMed , MEDLINE , EMBASE , CINAHL , PsycINFO , and relevant sources of grey literature . R and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) which have evaluated psychological interventions in adult cancer patients after the completion of treatment , with fatigue as an outcome measure , will be included . Two review authors will independently extract data from the selected studies and assess the method ological quality using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool . Discussion Most existing evidence on cancer-related fatigue is from those in active cancer treatment . This systematic review and meta- analysis will build upon previous evaluations of psychological interventions in people during and after cancer treatment . With the growing need for stage-specific research in cancer , this review seeks to highlight a gap in current practice and to strengthen the evidence base of r and omised controlled trials in the area . Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42014015219
Conclusion : Despite a systematic bias towards recruitment of individuals younger than the epidemiological average into the r and omized controlled trials , older people with heart failure did benefit from structured telephone support and telemonitoring .
While further research is required to confirm these observational findings , the evidence at h and indicates that discrimination by age alone may be not be appropriate when inviting participation in a remote monitoring service for heart failure
Background : There are few data regarding the effectiveness of remote monitoring for older people with heart failure .
We conducted a post-hoc sub- analysis of a previously published large Cochrane systematic review and meta- analysis of relevant r and omized controlled trials to determine whether structured telephone support and telemonitoring were effective in this population .