Does hand osteoarthritis predict future hip or knee osteoarthritis? The factor subdimensions of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) help to specify hip and knee osteoarthritis. a prospective evaluation and validation study. Aquatic Physical Therapy for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis: Results of a Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Patient and provider interventions for managing osteoarthritis in primary care: protocols for two randomized controlled trials
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the risk of future hip or knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) in subjects with h and OA at baseline and to evaluate whether the concurrent presence of h and OA , other risk factors for OA , or an OA biomarker ( type II collagen C-telopeptide degradation product [ CTX-II ] ) further increases the risk . METHODS Radiographs of the h and s ( baseline ) and the hips and knees ( baseline and 6.6 years later ) were obtained in a r and omly selected subset of participants in the Rotterdam Study who were ages 55 years and older . Radiographs were scored for the presence of OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence ( K/L ) system . A total of 1,235 subjects without OA of the hip/knee ( K/L score 0 - 1 ) at baseline were included in the study . CTX-II levels were measured at baseline . The independent risk of future hip/knee OA in subjects with h and OA at baseline was assessed by logistic regression , as stratified for age , sex , body mass index , family history of OA , and heavy workload . RESULTS Overall 12.1 % of the participants ( 19.7 % of those with h and OA versus 10.0 % of those without ) developed hip or knee OA ( odds ratio [ OR ] 2.1 [ 95 % confidence interval ( 95 % CI ) 1.3 - 3.1 ] ) . Subjects with h and OA had an increased risk of future hip OA ( OR 3.0 [ 95 % CI 1.6 - 5.4 ] ) , which was further increased in those with a family history of OA . Subjects with h and OA had an OR of 1.6 [ 95 % CI 1.0 - 2.8 ) for the future development of knee OA , which was further increased in those who were overweight . Concurrent h and OA and high levels of CTX-II further increased the risk of having hip or knee OA at followup ( OR 4.2 [ 95 % CI 2.3 - 7.8 ] ) . CONCLUSION The presence of h and OA at baseline showed an increased risk of future hip/knee OA ( higher for hip OA than for knee OA ) . The concurrent presence of h and OA and other OA risk factors or high CTX-II levels further increased the risk of future hip/knee OA OBJECTIVE To determine whether it is possible to specify different score patterns for hip and knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) , and to identify the degree of responsiveness and the validity of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( WOMAC ) factors , which are alternative health dimensions obtained by factor analysis of the WOMAC items . METHODS  WOMAC scales and WOMAC factors  were compared in a prospect i ve setting examining patients with hip and knee OA before and after rehabilitative inpatient intervention ( n = 317 ) . In a partial sample ( n = 103 ) , the validity of the WOMAC factors was determined by a global rating of their activities . RESULTS The WOMAC factor " ascending/descending " was significantly different for hip and knee OA in the health state before therapy ( score in hip 5.09 , in knee 6.59 ; p < 0.001 ) ; this was also true of the effect size after therapy ( hip 0.39 , knee 0.65 ; p = 0.012 ) . The WOMAC scales did not differ for the 2 conditions . The WOMAC factor " ascending/descending " was the most responsive dimension in knee OA ( effect size 0.65 ) , but in hip OA the WOMAC pain scale was most responsive ( effect size 0.55 ) . Most of the WOMAC factors correlated moderately ( r = 0.52 - 0.69 ) with the patient 's self-rating on the validation question naire . CONCLUSION The WOMAC factors are valid measures . Analyzing the WOMAC by the WOMAC factors facilitates and improves the differential relevance and accuracy of the WOMAC for specific conditions such as hip and knee OA Background and Purpose Aquatic physical therapy is frequently used in the management of patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) , yet there is little research establishing its efficacy for this population . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of aquatic physical therapy on hip or knee OA . Subjects A total of 71 volunteers with symptomatic hip OA or knee OA participated in this study . Methods The study was design ed as a r and omized controlled trial in which participants r and omly received 6 weeks of aquatic physical therapy or no aquatic physical therapy . Outcome measures included pain , physical function , physical activity levels , quality of life , and muscle strength . Results The intervention result ed in less pain and joint stiffness and greater physical function , quality of life , and hip muscle strength . Totals of 72 % and 75 % of participants reported improvements in pain and function , respectively , compared with only 17 % ( each ) of control participants . Benefits were maintained 6 weeks after the completion of physical therapy , with 84 % of participants continuing independently . Discussion and Conclusion Compared with no intervention , a 6-week program of aquatic physical therapy result ed in significantly less pain and improved physical function , strength , and quality of life . It is unclear whether the benefits were attributable to intervention effects or a placebo response Background Osteoarthritis ( OA ) of the hip and knee are among the most common chronic conditions , result ing in substantial pain and functional limitations . Adequate management of OA requires a combination of medical and behavioral strategies . However , some recommended therapies are under-utilized in clinical setting s , and the majority of patients with hip and knee OA are overweight and physically inactive . Consequently , interventions at the provider-level and patient-level both have potential for improving outcomes . This manuscript describes two ongoing r and omized clinical trials being conducted in two different health care systems , examining patient-based and provider-based interventions for managing hip and knee OA in primary care . Methods / Design One study is being conducted within the Department of Veterans Affairs ( VA ) health care system and will compare a Combined Patient and Provider intervention relative to usual care  among n = 300 patients ( 10 from each of 30 primary care providers ) . Another study is being conducted within the Duke Primary Care Research Consortium and will compare Patient Only , Provider Only , and Combined ( Patient + Provider ) interventions relative to usual care  among n = 560 patients across 10 clinics . Participants in these studies have clinical and / or radiographic evidence of hip or knee osteoarthritis , are overweight , and do not meet current physical activity guidelines . The 12-month , telephone-based patient intervention focuses on physical activity , weight management , and cognitive behavioral pain management . The provider intervention involves provision of patient-specific recommendations for care ( e.g. , referral to physical therapy , knee brace , joint injection ) , based on evidence -based guidelines . Outcomes are collected at baseline , 6-months , and 12-months . The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index ( self-reported pain , stiffness , and function ) , and secondary outcomes are the Short Physical Performance Test Protocol ( objective physical function ) and the Patient Health Question naire-8 ( depressive symptoms ) . Cost effectiveness of the interventions will also be assessed . Discussion Results of these two studies will further our underst and ing of the most effective strategies for improving hip and knee OA outcomes in primary care setting s . Trial registration NCT01130740 ( VA ) ; NCT 01435109 ( NIH
For patients with knee OA there is limited evidence that a lower level of physical function is associated with a lower level of physical activity .
There is also limited evidence that depression is not associated with the level of physical activity .
For patients with hip OA there is limited evidence that higher age , higher body mass index ( BMI ) and a low level of physical function is associated with a low level of physical activity .
CONCLUSION A high age ( hip OA ) , a high BMI ( hip OA ) and a low level of physical function ( both hip and knee OA ) are related to a low level of physical activity .
OBJECTIVE To give an overview of factors related to the level of physical activity  in patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis ( OA ) .