Results from a multicentre comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: is cryoablation more reproducible? Long-term comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score matched analysis. Early Recurrence After Pulmonary Vein Isolation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation With Different Ablation Technologies - Prospective Comparison of Radiofrequency vs. Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation. German ablation registry: Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation--One-year outcome data. Cryoballoon vs. open irrigated radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: long-term FreezeAF outcomes Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins in 40 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency for pulmonary vein re-isolation after a failed initial ablation procedure in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Acute and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using the Second-Generation Cryoballoon versus Open-Irrigated Radiofrequency: A Multicenter Experience. Two-Year Follow-Up after Contact Force Sensing Radiofrequency Catheter and Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Comparative Single Centre Study Cryoballoon Versus Open Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Cryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry. Rationale and Design of FIRE AND ICE: A multicenter randomized trial comparing efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation using a cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation with 3D-reconstruction. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency contact force ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score analysis Contact-force guided radiofrequency vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective evaluation.
Aim Cryoballoon ablation ( Cryoballoon ) has emerged as a new alternative for the treatment of  symptomatic drug-refractory atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . Whether the results of Cryoballoon are more reproducible than those of radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation remains to be proved . Methods and results A total of 860 consecutive patients undergoing a first ablation procedure for paroxysmal AF ( 467 treated with RF and 393 treated with Cryoballoon ) were selected from a prospect i ve multicentre survey of AF ablation ( FrenchAF ) .  Radiofrequency and Cryoballoon were compared regarding mid-term efficacy and safety . During a median follow-up of 14 months ( interquartile range 8–23 ) , patients treated with Cryoballoon displayed similar rates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia relapse in centres performing this technique ( 68–80 % at 18 months ) . However , in centres performing RF , a greater heterogeneity in procedural results was observed ( 46–79 % were free from atrial arrhythmia relapse at 18 months ) . On multivariate analysis , Cryoballoon ( HR = 0.47 , 95 % CI 0.35–0.65 , P < 0.001 ) and annual AF ablation caseload ( HR = 0.87 per every 100 AF ablation procedures per year ; 95 % CI 0.80–0.96 , P = 0.003 ) were independent predictors of procedural success . However , on sensitivity analysis , according to the ablation method , annual AF ablation caseload predicted only sinus rhythm maintenance in the subgroup of patients treated with RF . Analysis of interoperator results with Cryoballoon and RF confirmed lower reproducibility of RF , but suggested that besides caseload , other operator-related factors may play a role . Conclusion Cryoballoon seems to be less operator-dependent and more reproducible than RF in the setting of paroxysmal AF ablation BACKGROUND Although radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) based technologies for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) have both individually been demonstrated to be effective and safe for the treatment of paroxysmal AF , head-to-head comparisons are lacking . The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation . METHODS Out of a prospect i ve registry of 327 patients undergoing PVI , 208 patients ( age 58±11 years , ejection fraction 59±6 % , left atrial size 39±6 mm ) with paroxysmal AF were identified . The presented data set was obtained by 1:1 propensity score matching and contained 142 patients undergoing CB-PVI or RF-PVI in conjunction with a 3D mapping system , respectively . We compared single procedure efficacy of the two methods using a Cox proportional hazards model . RESULTS After a mean follow-up of 28 months and a single procedure , AF recurred in 37 of 71 ( 52 % ) in the CB-PVI group and in 31 of 71 patients ( 44 % ) in the RF-PVI group ( HR [ 95 % CI]=1.19 [ 0.74 , 1.92 ] , p=0.48 ) . Recurrence of AF for PVI using solely the CB was observed in 23 of 51 ( 45 % ) patients and in 23 of 51 ( 45 % ) patients in the corresponding RF-PVI group ( HR [ 95 % CI]=0.93 [ 0.52 , 1.66 ] , p=0.81 ) . Complication rate was not different between the groups . CONCLUSION A propensity score matched comparison between CB-PVI and RF-PVI using a 3D-mapping system for AF ablation showed similar long-term success rates BACKGROUND Inflammation plays a prominent role in the etiology of the early recurrence of  atrial fibrillation ( ERAF ) . We prospect ively compared the proportion of ERAF and time-course patterns of biomarkers between radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation . METHODS AND RESULTS We enrolled 82 consecutive paroxysmal AF patients undergoing pulmonary vein ( PV ) isolation , performed with either a 28-mm 2nd-generation CB and 3-min freeze technique or point-by-point RF ablation .  Each group had 41 patients . In the RF group , all PVs were successfully isolated with 28.9 ± 6.5 min of RF delivery . In the CB group , a mean of 5.3 ± 1.4 applications/patient was delivered . The proportion of ERAF was similar between the groups . The time-course patterns significantly differed between the groups for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ( hs-CRP ) value ( P=0.006 ) and myocardial injury markers ( P<0.0001 ) . Greater myocardial injury was observed in the CB than in the RF group ( P<0.0001 ) , whereas the peak hs-CRP value was comparable between the groups . The 2-day post-procedure hs-CRP value was the sole factor correlating with ERAF as identified by the multivariable analysis ( hazard ratio 1.697 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.005 - 2.865 ; P=0.048 ) in the RF , but not the CB group . CONCLUSIONS The proportion of ERAF was comparable after RF and 2nd-generation CB ablation . Despite CB ablation exhibiting greater myocardial injury than RF ablation , the inflammatory responses were comparable between the groups . The inflammatory response extent predicted ERAF post-RF ablation but not post-CB ablation BACKGROUND Although radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation has long been the st and ard of care for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation , cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results . Prospect i ve multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation are lacking so far . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to report data from the German ablation registry with respect to efficacy and safety in pulmonary vein ablation with different energy sources for paroxysmal AF after 1-year follow-up . METHODS A total of 2306 patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF from the German ablation registry were included in this analysis . The cohort was divided into two groups according to the ablation energy source used : cryoballoon and RF ablation .  MACCE was defined as a combination of death , myocardial infa rct ion , or stroke . RESULTS AF recurrence rate after a single ablation procedure at 1 year follow-up was not significantly different between the two groups ( 45.8 % after cryoablation and 45.4 % after RF ablation , P = .87 ) . Also , the rate of patients without AF recurrence and free of antiarrhythmic drug at 12-month follow-up was similar ( cryoablation 44.2 % and RF 41.4 % , P = .25 ) . MACCE occurred with an incidence of 0.7 % within 500 days after cryoablation and 1.4 % after RF ablation ( P = .30 ) . Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was more common after cryoablation compared to RF ablation ( 1.1 % vs. 0.3 % , P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION AF recurrence rate at 1-year follow-up was similar in RF ablation compared to cryoablation , whereas the spectrum and relevance of complications were significantly different between the two ablation methods . This finding might influence the choice of ablation method offered to the individual paroxysmal AF patient Background Effective treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is essential for reducing the risk of stroke and heart failure .  Cryoballoon ( CB ) ablation has been developed as an alternative to the use of radiofrequency ( RF ) energy for electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins . Herein , we provide long-term data regarding the efficacy of CB ablation in comparison to RF . Methods FreezeAF was a r and omised non-inferiority study comparing CB ablation with RF ablation for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal AF . Procedural success for the long-term follow-up ( 30 months ) was defined as freedom from AF with an absence of persistent complications . Results Of the 315 patients that were r and omised and received catheter ablation , 292 ( 92.7 % ) completed the 30-month follow-up ( 147 in the RF group and 145 in the CB group ) . The baseline characteristics of the RF and CB groups were similar . Single-procedure success was achieved by 40 % of patients in the RF group and 42 % of the CB group ( p < 0.001 for non-inferiority ) . When including re-do procedures in the analysis , the multiple procedure success rate was 72 % in the RF group and 76 % in the CB group . Conclusion The data provide long-term evidence that CB ablation is non-inferior to RF ablation , with high proportions of patients reporting freedom from AF 30 months after the index procedure . Trial registration Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : NCT00774566 ; first registered October 16 , 2008 ; first patient included October 20 , 2008 INTRODUCTION Ablation of pulmonary veins ( PV ) is an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .  Radiofrequency ( RF ) is currently the most widespread energy source for PV ablation . Cryothermal energy applied with a cryoballoon technique as an alternative has recently evolved . METHODS AND RESULTS In a case-control setting , we compared 20 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent their first PV ablation with the cryoballoon technique to 20 matched patients with conventional RF ablation .  In the case of persistent electrical potentials after cryoballoon ablation , it was combined with ablation with a conventional cryocatheter . All patients performed daily event recording for 3 months after ablation procedure . Ablation parameters and success rate after 3 and 6 months were compared . In the cryoballoon group , the overall success rate was 55 % ( 50 % in the cryoballoon only group [ 14 patients ] and 66 % in the combination group [ 6 patients ] ) , as opposed to the RF group with 45 % . AF episode burden was lower after cryoballoon ablation . There was no significant difference between cryoballoon and RF ablation regarding procedure parameters . In the cryoballoon group , 3 phrenic nerve palsies occurred using the 23 mm balloon that resolved spontaneously . CONCLUSION PV ablation with the cryoballoon technique is feasible and seems to have a similar success rate in comparison to RF ablation . Procedure- and fluoroscopy duration are not longer than in conventional RF ablation AIM Catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) is associated with an important risk of early and late recurrence , necessitating repeat ablation procedures . The aim of this prospect i ve r and omized patient-blind study was to compare the efficacy and safety of cryoballoon ( Cryo ) versus radiofrequency ( RF ) ablation of PAF after failed initial RF ablation procedure . METHODS Patients with a history of symptomatic PAF after a previous failed first RF ablation procedure were eligible for this study . Patients were r and omized to Cryo or RF redo ablation . The primary endpoint of the study was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia , including AF and left atrial flutter/tachycardia , after a second ablation procedure at 1 year of follow-up . All patients were implanted with a cardiac monitor ( Reveal XT , Medtronic ) to continuously track the cardiac rhythm . Patients with an AF burden ( AF% ) ≤ 0.5 % were considered AF-free ( Responders ) , while those with an AF% > 0.5 % were classified as patients with AF recurrences ( non-Responders ) . RESULTS Eighty patients with AF recurrences after a first RF pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) were r and omized to Cryo ( N = 40 ) or to RF ( N = 40 ) . Electrical potentials were recorded in 77 mapped PVs ( 1.9 ± 0.8 per patient ) in Cryo Group and 72 PVs ( 1.7 ± 0.8 per patient ) in RF Group ( P = 0.62 ) , all of which were targeted . In Cryo group , 68 ( 88 % ) of the 77 PVs were re-isolated using only Cryo technique ; the remaining 9 PVs were re-isolated using RF . In RF group , all 72 PVs were successfully re-isolated ( P = 0.003 vs Cryo ) . By intention-to-treat , 23 ( 58 % ) RF patients were AF-free vs 17 ( 43 % ) Cryo patients on no antiarrhythmic drugs at 1 year ( P = 0.06 ) . Three patients had temporary phrenic nerve paralysis in the Cryo group ; the RF group had no complications . Of the 29 patients who had only Cryo PVI without any RF ablation , 11 ( 38 % ) were AF-free vs 20 ( 59 % ) of the 34 patients who had RF only ( P = 0.021 ) . CONCLUSION When patients require a redo pulmonary vein isolation ablation procedure for recurrent PAF , RF appears to be the preferred energy source relative to Cryo INTRODUCTION There are limited comparative data on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( CAAF ) using the second-generation cryoballoon ( CB-2 ) versus point-by-point radiofrequency ( RF ) . This study examines the acute/long-term CAAF outcomes using these 2 strategies . METHODS AND RESULTS In this multicenter , retrospective , nonr and omized analysis , procedural and clinical outcomes of 1,196 patients ( 76 % with paroxysmal AF ) undergoing CAAF using CB-2 ( n = 773 ) and open-irrigated , non-force sensing RF ( n = 423 ) were evaluated . Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 98 % with CB-2 and 99 % with RF ( P = 0.168 ) . CB-2 was associated with shorter ablation time ( 40 ± 14 min vs. 66 ± 26 min ; P < 0.001 ) and procedure time ( 145 ± 49 minutes vs. 188 ± 42 minutes ; P < 0.001 ) , but greater fluoroscopic utilization ( 29 ± 13 minutes vs. 23 ± 14 minutes ; P < 0.001 ) . While transient ( 7.6 % vs. 0 % ; P < 0.001 ) and persistent ( 1.2 % vs. 0 % ; P = 0.026 ) phrenic nerve palsy occurred exclusively with CB-2 , other adverse event rates were similar between CB-2 ( 1.6 % ) and RF ( 2.6 % ) ; P = 0.207 . However , freedom from AF/atrial flutter/tachycardia at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy was greater with CB-2 ( 76.6 % ) versus RF ( 60.4 % ) ; P < 0.001 . While this difference was evident in patients with paroxysmal AF ( P < 0.001 ) , it did not reach significance in those with persistent AF ( P = 0.089 ) . Additionally , CB-2 was associated with reduced long-term need for antiarrhythmic therapy ( 16.7 % vs. 22.0 % ; P = 0.024 ) and repeat ablations ( 14.6 % vs. 24.1 % ; P < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSION In this multicenter , retrospective , nonr and omized study , CAAF using CB-2 coupled with RF as occasionally required was associated with greater freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy when compared to open-irrigated , non-force sensing RF , alone Background . There are little comparative data on catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) using the contact force radiofrequency ( CF-RF ) catheter versus the second-generation cryoballoon ( CB2 ) . Methods and results . This is a single center , retrospective , nonr and omized study of 98 patients with symptomatic , drug-refractory paroxysmal AF who underwent their first PVI ablation using either the CB2 ( n = 40 ) or CF-RF ( n = 58 ) . The mean age was 60 years with 63 % men , a mean LA size of 42 mm . The procedure duration ( 74 ± 17 versus 120 ± 49 minutes p < 0.05 ) was shorter for CB2 group ; the fluoroscopy time ( 14 ± 17 versus 16 ± 5 minutes , p = 0.45 ) was similar . Complete PVI was achieved in 96 % of patients with RF-CF and 98 % with CB2 . Phrenic nerve palsies ( 2 transient and 1 persistent ) occurred exclusively in the CB2 group and 1 severe , nonlethal complication ( pericardial tamponade ) occurred in the CF-RF group . At 24-month follow-up , the success rate , defined as freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia ( AT ) after a single procedure without antiarrhythmic drug , was comparable in CF-RF group and CB2 group ( 65.5 % versus 67 % , resp . , log rank p = 0.54 ) . Conclusion . Both the CB2 and the RF-CF ablation appeared safe ; the success rate at 2 years was comparable between both technologies Background — There is a lack of data on the comparative efficacy and procedural safety of open irrigated radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon catheter ( CB ) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Methods and Results — In a prospect i ve , noninferiority study , 315 patients were r and omly assigned to RF ( n=159 ) or CB ( n=156 ) ablation . The primary end point was freedom from atrial arrhythmia with absence of persistent complications . Patients were largely comparable between groups with more vascular disease in the RF group ( 8.2 % versus 2.6 % for CB ; P=0.028 ) . The primary end point at 12 months was achieved by 70.7 % with RF and 73.6 % with CB ( multiple procedure success ) , including 31 redo procedures in each group ( 19.5 % of RF versus 19.9 % of CB ; P=0.933 ) . For the intention-to-treat population , noninferiority of CB was revealed for the predefined inferiority margin ( risk difference , 0.029 ; 95 % confidence interval , −0.074 to 0.132 ; P<0.001 ) . Rates at 6 months were 63.1 % and 64.1 % for the RF and CB groups ( single procedure success ) , and noninferiority was confirmed ( risk difference , 0.010 ; 95 % confidence interval , −0.097 to 0.116 ; P=0.002 ) . Periprocedural complications for the index procedure were more frequent in the CB group ( 5.0 % RF , 12.2 % CB ; P=0.022 ) with a significant difference in phrenic nerve palsies ( 0 % RF , 5.8 % CB ; P=0.002 ) . Conclusion — This large , prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled study demonstrates noninferiority of CB ablation versus RF ablation for treating patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00774566 BACKGROUND Catheter ablation is used extensively with curative intention in atrial fibrillation .  Radiofrequency ablation has long been a st and ard of care , while cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results . Prospect i ve multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation therapy are lacking . METHODS Between January 2007 and August 2011 , a total of 3,775 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF who underwent PV ablation in their respective centers were enrolled . The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the ablation energy source used : cryoballoon ablation ( group 1 , n = 905 [ 24.0 % ] , median age 63 years , 64.3 % men ) and RF ablation ( group 2 , n = 2870 [ 76.0 % ] , median age 63 years , 62.7 % men ) . Comorbidities and baseline clinical characteristics were similar in both groups . RESULTS Acute success rate was similar in both groups ( 97.5 % in cryo vs 97.6 % in RF ; P = 0.81 ) . Procedure times were similar , ablation and fluoroscopy times were higher in cryoballoon when compared to RF ablation .  Overall complication rate was similar in cryo- ( 4.6 % ) and RF-ablation ( 4.6 % ; P = 1.0 ) . Phrenic nerve palsy was more often in cryo versus RF ablation ( 2.1 % in cryo vs 0.0 % in RF ; P < 0.001 ) . Other complications were more common in RF compared to cryoablation ( 4.6 % in RF vs 2.7 % in cryo ; P < 0.05 ) . CONCLUSION RF ablation is the most widespread ablation method in Germany , but use of cryoballoon increased significantly . Procedure times were similar , but ablation and fluoroscopy times were longer in cryoballoon ablation . No significant differences were found in terms of acute success and overall complication rate BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia imposing substantial morbidity and mortality . Catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) using radiofrequency current ( RFC ) has become a st and ard treatment for drug-resistant and symptomatic paroxysmal AF ( PAF ) . In recent years , the cryoballoon-based technique is increasingly used as a promising alternative with a short learning curve . METHODS The FIRE AND ICE trial is a prospect i ve , r and omized , controlled , open , blinded outcome assessment , noninferiority trial comparing cryoballoon- , and RFC-based PVI .  Patients with drug-resistant PAF will be r and omized in a 1:1 matrix in multiple European centers . The primary hypothesis is that cryoballoon ablation is not inferior to RFC ablation using 3-dimensional mapping with respect to clinical efficacy . The primary endpoint is defined as the time to first documented clinical failure , including : ( 1 ) recurrence of AF ; ( 2 ) atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia ; ( 3 ) prescription of class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs ; or ( 4 ) re-ablation , whichever comes first , following a blanking period of 3 months after the index ablation procedure . The primary safety endpoint is a composite of death , stroke/transient ischemic attack , cardiac arrhythmias ( apart from AF recurrence ) causally related to the therapeutic intervention , and procedure-related serious adverse events . CONCLUSION The FIRE AND ICE trial compares 2 different technologies to perform catheter ablation of PAF with respect to efficacy and safety . It aims at providing objective data to guide selection and usage of ablation catheters in the treatment of AF BACKGROUND Current guidelines recommend pulmonary-vein isolation by means of catheter ablation as treatment for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation .  Radiofrequency ablation is the most common method , and cryoballoon ablation is the second most frequently used technology . METHODS We conducted a multicenter , r and omized trial to determine whether cryoballoon ablation was noninferior to radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation . The primary efficacy end point in a time-to-event analysis was the first documented clinical failure ( recurrence of atrial fibrillation , occurrence of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia , use of antiarrhythmic drugs , or repeat ablation ) following a 90-day period after the index ablation . The noninferiority margin was prespecified as a hazard ratio of 1.43 . The primary safety end point was a composite of death , cerebrovascular events , or serious treatment-related adverse events . RESULTS A total of 762 patients underwent r and omization ( 378 assigned to cryoballoon ablation and 384 assigned to radiofrequency ablation ) . The mean duration of follow-up was 1.5 years . The primary efficacy end point occurred in 138 patients in the cryoballoon group and in 143 in the radiofrequency group ( 1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate estimates , 34.6 % and 35.9 % , respectively ; hazard ratio , 0.96 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] , 0.76 to 1.22 ; P<0.001 for noninferiority ) . The primary safety end point occurred in 40 patients in the cryoballoon group and in 51 patients in the radiofrequency group ( 1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate estimates , 10.2 % and 12.8 % , respectively ; hazard ratio , 0.78 ; 95 % CI , 0.52 to 1.18 ; P=0.24 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this r and omized trial , cryoballoon ablation was noninferior to radiofrequency ablation with respect to efficacy for the treatment of patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , and there was no significant difference between the two methods with regard to overall safety . ( Funded by Medtronic ; FIRE AND ICE Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT01490814 . ) Background Radiofrequency and cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation are common approaches for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treatment , showing similar results in recent multicenter studies , including heterogeneous tools and protocol s. The aim of this study is to compare prospect ively in a single , high-volume center the outcome of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation performed specifically by second-generation cryoballoon or contact force radiofrequency ablation . Methods Consecutive patients scheduled for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation have been included and prospect ively followed up . Aim ing to reduce potential bias deriving from baseline characteristics , a propensity score matching analysis has been performed to analyze safety and efficacy outcomes . Results Out of consecutive patients undergoing atrial fibrillation transcatheter ablation between January 2015 and December 2016 , 46 patients approached by cryoablation  were matched 1 : 1 by propensity score to a similar population treated by last-generation radiofrequency ablation .  Freedom from atrial fibrillation after 12 months ( 76 vs. 78 % , P = 0.804 ) and incidence of complications ( 4 vs. 6 % , P = 0.168 ) did not differ between the two groups . Radiological exposure was higher for the cryoballoon group ( 11 vs. 4 min , P < 0.001 ) , whereas procedural duration did not differ ( P = 0.174 ) . Aim ing to assess the potential impact of a learning curve in patients undergoing cryoablation , the first-third of patients ( n = 15 ) were compared with the remaining , reporting longer radiological exposure ( P < 0.001 ) , but similar safety and efficacy . Conclusion In this propensity score analysis , last-generation cryoballoon and radiofrequency catheters for atrial fibrillation ablation present similar efficacy and safety .  Cryoablation requires longer fluoroscopy exposure compared with radiofrequency , although this is reduced by increased experience AIMS In the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , there are no available data comparing the mid-term outcome of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) catheter ablation using contact-force (CF)-guided radiofrequency ( RF ) vs. second-generation balloon cryotherapy . METHODS AND RESULTS Prospect i ve single-centre evaluation , carried out from March 2011 to February 2013 , comparing CF radiofrequency ( Thermocool ( ® ) SmartTouch ™ , Biosense Webster , Inc. ) ( CF group ) with cryoballoon ablation ( A rct ic Front Advance ™ 28 mm cryoballoon , Medtronic , Inc. ) ( CB group ) , in regards to procedural safety and efficacy , as well as recurrence at 12 months . Overall , 150 consecutive patients were enrolled ( 75 in each group ) . The characteristics of patients of both the groups were similar ( 61.2 ± 9.9 years , women 25.3 % , mean AF duration 4.1 ± 4.0 years , mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 1.4 ± 1.3 , mean HAS-BLED 1.4 ± 0.6 ) . Duration of the procedure was significantly lower in the CF group ( 110.7 ± 32.5 vs. 134.5 ± 48.3 min , P = 0.001 ) , with a lower duration of fluoroscopy ( 21.5 ± 8.5 vs. 25.3 ± 9.9 min , P = 0.017 ) and X-ray exposure ( 4748 ± 2411 cGy cm² vs. 7734 ± 5361 cGy cm² , P = 0.001 ) . In contrast , no significant difference was found regarding significant procedural complication ( 2.7 vs. 1.3 % in CF and CB groups , respectively ; P = 0.56 ) , and PVI was eventually achieved in all cases . At 12 months , AF recurrence occurred in 11 patients ( 14.7 % ) in the CB group and in 9 patients ( 12.0 % ) in the CF group ( HR = 1.20 95 % CI 0.50 - 2.90 ; log rank P = 0.682 ) . CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary findings suggest that CF-guided radiofrequency and cryotherapy present very similar performances in the setting of paroxysmal AF catheter ablation
Conclusions CB-2 tended to be more effective in comparison to NCF catheter and at least non-inferior to CF catheter , with shorter procedure time and similar safety endpoint
Purpose Currently , radiofrequency ( RF ) and cryoballoon are the most commonly used ablation technologies for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) .
We performed a meta- analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the second-generation cryoballoons ( CB-2 ) compared with RF for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( PAF ) ablation .