A strategy to achieve CRT response in permanent atrial fibrillation without obligatory atrioventricular node ablation. Four-year efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy on exercise tolerance and disease progression: the importance of performing atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the COMPANION trial. Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 2-year follow-up study. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure (The CAMTAF Trial) Ablation vs medical therapy in the setting of symptomatic atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction. Atrioventricular nodal ablation predicts survival benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy. Mortality After Atrioventricular Nodal Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation With Permanent Ventricular Pacing in Atrial Fibrillation: Outcomes From a Controlled Nonrandomized Study Efficacy, safety, and outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design.
BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) is an established method in patients with severe heart failure and wide QRS configuration , particularly during sinus rhythm ( SR ) . In CRT patients with permanent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) , there is no general consensus regarding the need for atrioventricular node ( AVN ) ablation . The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of CRT in permanent AF with and without AVN ablation . METHODS New York Heart Association classification , QRS duration , and echocardiographic parameters were assessed before and after CRT with a follow-up of 12 ± 3 months . Two hundred thirty patients in SR and 46 patients with permanent AF of 2.1 ± 0.5 years duration were studied .  AVN ablation was performed only in AF patients with insufficient pharmacological rate control evidence d by ≤80 % ventricular stimulation . RESULTS Fifteen AF patients underwent AVN ablation . Biventricular pacing comparably improved functional status , left ventricular ejection fraction , and left ventricular end-diastolic dimensions in all treated groups . Biventricular stimulation percentage was 10 % lower in pharmacologically treated AF patients over 1 year as compared to patients in SR and to AF patients undergoing AVN ablation , which did not affect outcome in this patient population . CONCLUSION In patients with permanent AF and CRT , an AVN ablation strategy might not be strictly required in all patients OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) in heart failure patients with permanent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and the role of atrioventricular junction ( AVJ ) ablation . BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy has been proven effective in heart failure patients with sinus rhythm ( SR ) . However , little is known about the effects of CRT in heart failure patients with permanent AF . METHODS Efficacy of CRT on ventricular function , exercise performance , and reversal of maladaptive remodeling process was prospect ively compared in 48 patients with permanent AF in whom ventricular rate was controlled by drugs , thus result ing in apparently adequate delivery of biventricular pacing ( > 85 % of pacing time ) , and in 114 permanent AF patients , who had undergone AVJ ablation ( 100 % of resynchronization therapy delivery ) . The clinical and echocardiographic long-term outcomes of both groups were compared with those of 511 SR patients treated with CRT . RESULTS Both SR and AF groups showed significant and sustained improvements of all assessed parameters ( model p < 0.001 for all parameters ) . However , within the AF group , only patients who underwent ablation showed a significant increase of ejection fraction ( p < 0.001 ) , reverse remodeling effect ( p < 0.001 ) , and improved exercise tolerance ( p < 0.001 ) ; no improvements were observed in AF patients who did not undergo ablation . CONCLUSIONS Heart failure patients with ventricular conduction disturbance and permanent AF treated with CRT showed large and sustained long-term ( up to 4 year ) improvements of left ventricular function and functional capacity , similar to patients in SR , only if AVJ ablation was performed BACKGROUND Controlled clinical trial data are lacking for cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure ( HF ) from reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) and intermittent atrial fibrillation or flutter ( IAF/AFL ) . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe CRT outcomes in patients with IAF/AFL and advanced HF . METHODS HF outcomes in patients in the COMPANION ( Comparison of Medical Therapy , Pacing , and Defibrillation in Heart Failure ) trial with New York Heart Association class III or IV HFrEF , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 , sinus rhythm at r and omization , and no history of baseline arrhythmia were compared with those with a history of IAF/AFL . RESULTS In those with no history of baseline arrhythmia ( n = 887 ) , compared with optimal pharmacological therapy ( OPT ) with no CRT , the CRT + OPT arms exhibited a significant reduction in the end points of death or any hospitalization ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.73 [ 95 % Confidence Interval ( CI ) : 0.60 to 0.89 ] ; P = .002 ) and death or HF hospitalization ( HR 0.53 [ 95 % CI : 0.41 to 0.68 ] ; P < .001 ) . In contrast , in the IAF/AFL subgroup ( n = 293 ) , CRT did not result in improved outcomes compared with OPT ( death or any hospitalization : HR 1.16 [ 95 % CI : 0.83 to 1.63 ] ; P = .38 ; death or HF hospitalization : HR 0.97 [ 95 % CI : 0.64 to 1.46 ] ; P = .88 ) . The interaction between history of AF/AFL and CRT was statistically significant for both outcomes ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION In the COMPANION trial , patients with moderate to severe HFrEF and a history of IAF/AFL had no benefit from CRT Background — Whether catheter ablation ( CA ) is superior to amiodarone ( AMIO ) for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in patients with heart failure is unknown . Methods and Results — This was an open-label , r and omized , parallel-group , multicenter study . Patients with persistent AF , dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator , New York Heart Association II to III , and left ventricular ejection fraction < 40 % within the past 6 months were r and omly assigned ( 1:1 ratio ) to undergo CA for AF ( group 1 , n=102 ) or receive AMIO ( group 2 , n=101 ) . Recurrence of AF was the primary end point . All-cause mortality and unplanned hospitalization were the secondary end points . Patients were followed up for a minimum of 24 months . At the end of follow-up , 71 ( 70 % ; 95 % confidence interval , 60%–78 % ) patients in group 1 were recurrence free after an average of 1.4±0.6 procedures in comparison with 34 ( 34 % ; 95 % confidence interval , 25%–44 % ) in group 2 ( log-rank P<0.001 ) . The success rate  of CA in the different centers after a single procedure ranged from 29 % to 61 % . After adjusting for covariates in the multivariable model , AMIO therapy was found to be significantly more likely to fail ( hazard ratio , 2.5 ; 95 % confidence interval , 1.5–4.3 ; P<0.001 ) than CA . Over the 2-year follow-up , the unplanned hospitalization rate was ( 32 [ 31 % ] in group 1 and 58 [ 57 % ] in group 2 ; P<0.001 ) , showing 45 % relative risk reduction ( relative risk , 0.55 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.39–0.76 ) . A significantly lower mortality was observed in CA ( 8 [ 8 % ] versus AMIO ( 18 [ 18 % ] ; P=0.037 ) . Conclusions — This multicenter r and omized study shows that CA of AF is superior to AMIO in achieving freedom from AF at long-term follow-up and reducing unplanned hospitalization and mortality in patients with heart failure and persistent AF . Clinical Trial Registration — URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : NCT00729911 INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) and represents an important comorbidity in these patients . Cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) has been shown to be beneficial in patients with HF . Whether patients with AF benefit similarly from CRT as their counterparts in sinus rhythm is controversial . METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a cohort analysis of 175 patients ( 138 men ; age range 57 - 79 years ) who underwent CRT implantation during 2004 - 2008 in our institution . AF was documented in 66 patients ( 37.7 % of patients , 52 men ) . There were no differences in 1- or 2-year mortality between patients with and without AF ( 13.6 % vs 11.79 % , P = 0.7 ; 25.8 % vs 16.9 % , P = 0.2 , respectively ) . There were no differences between the groups in the rate of complications after CRT implantation or in the rate of appropriate electrical shocks . In the subgroup of AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator ( CRT-D ) ( n = 32 , 48.5 % ) , the 1-year mortality was 3.1 % as compared to 23.5 % in AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker ( P = 0.03 ) . This difference was no longer evident after 2 years ( 25.0 % vs 26.5 % , P = 0.8 , respectively ) . Ten patients ( 15.2 % ) with AF underwent atrioventricular ( AV ) node ablation . The 2-year mortality of these patients was 10.0 % as compared to 28.6 % in AF patients who did not undergo AV-node ablation ( P = 0.4 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this study , no difference in mortality appears to exist between patients with or without AF and who undergo CRT implantation . Our findings of the beneficial effects of AV-node ablation and CRT-D in AF patients deserve further investigation Background —Restoring sinus rhythm in patients with heart failure ( HF ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) may improve left ventricular ( LV ) function and HF symptoms . We sought to compare the effect of a catheter ablation strategy with that of a medical rate control strategy in patients with persistent AF and HF . Methods and Results — Patients with persistent AF , symptomatic HF , and LV ejection fraction < 50 % were r and omized to catheter ablation or medical rate control . The primary end-point was the difference between groups in LV ejection fraction at 6 months . Baseline LV ejection fraction was 32±8 % in the ablation group and 34±12 % in the medical group . Twenty-six patients underwent catheter ablation  , and 24 patients were rate controlled .  Freedom from AF was achieved in 21/26 ( 81 % ) at 6 months off antiarrhythmic drugs . LV ejection fraction at 6 months in the ablation group was 40±12 % compared with 31±13 % in the rate control group ( P=0.015 ) . Ablation was associated with better peak oxygen consumption ( 22±6 versus 18±6 mL/kg per minute ; P=0.014 ) and Minnesota living with HF question naire score ( 24±22 versus 47±22 ; P=0.001 ) compared with rate control . Conclusions —Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in selected patients with persistent AF and HF , and can improve LV function , functional capacity , and HF symptoms compared with rate control . Clinical Trial Registration —URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : Small , single-center studies suggest that catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation ( AF )  can improve ventricular function and reduce symptoms in patients with left ventricular ( LV ) dysfunction . However , ablation has not been compared with a pharmacologic strategy for AF . The authors evaluated patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction ( ejection fraction < or = 45 % ) referred for pulmonary vein isolation ( PVI ) . They compared these patients with a matched cohort treated medically for AF and LV dysfunction via a retrospective case-control method . Fifteen patients ( 14 men , 56+/-11 years , 10 [ 67 % ] paroxysmal AF ) with AF for 4+/-3 years underwent PVI .  Baseline ejection fraction was 37%+/-6 % and New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class was 2.0+/-1.0 . Fifteen controls ( 13 men , 63+/-14 years , 11 [ 73 % ] paroxysmal AF ) with AF for 5+/-4 years were treated medically for AF . Baseline ejection fraction was 34%+/-11 % and NYHA class was 2.0+/-0.7 . The groups were similar in all respects . During a follow-up of 16+/-13 months after complete PVI , ejection fraction improved ( P=.001 ) to 50%+/-13 % and normalized in 8 patients ( 53 % ) . NYHA class improved to 1.3+/-0.5 ( P=.01 ) . In the medically treated group , after follow-up of 16+/-12 months , no improvement in ejection fraction ( 36%+/-12 % ) or NYHA class ( 1.8+/-0.7 ) was seen . Compared with pharmacologic therapy , PVI significantly improved LV function and NYHA class in patients with AF and symptomatic LV dysfunction . These provocative findings provide potent rationale for a r and omized clinical trial comparing ablation with pharmacologic therapy BACKGROUND Cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) benefits patients with advanced heart failure . The role of atrioventricular nodal ( AVN ) ablation in improving CRT outcomes , including survival benefit in CRT recipients with atrial fibrillation , is uncertain . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of AVN ablation on clinical and survival outcomes in a large atrial fibrillation and heart failure population that met the current indication for CRT and to determine whether AVN ablation is an independent predictor of survival in CRT recipients . METHODS Of 154 patients with atrial fibrillation who received CRT-D , 45 ( 29 % ) underwent AVN ablation ( + AVN-ABL group ) , whereas 109 ( 71 % ) received drug therapy for rate control during CRT ( -AVN-ABL group ) . New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class , electrocardiogram , and echocardiogram were assessed before and after CRT .  Survival data were obtained from the national death and location data base ( Accurint ) . RESULTS CRT comparably improved left ventricular ejection fraction ( 8.1 % + /- 10.7 % vs 6.8 % + /- 9.6 % , P = .49 ) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ( -2.1 + /- 5.9 mm vs -2.1 + /- 6.7 mm , P = .74 ) in both + AVN-ABL and -AVN-ABL groups . Improvement in NYHA class was significantly greater in the + AVN-ABL group than in -AVN-ABL group ( -0.7 + /- 0.8 vs -0.4 + /- 0.8 , P = .04 ) . Survival estimates at 2 years were 96.0 % ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 88.6%-100 % ) for + AVN-ABL group and 76.5 % ( 95 % CI 68.1%-85.8 % ) for-AVN-ABL group ( P = .008 ) . AVN ablation was independently associated with survival benefit from death ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.13 , 95 % CI 0.03 - 0.58 , P = .007 ) and from combined death , heart transplant , and left ventricular assist device ( HR 0.19 , 95 % CI 0.06 - 0.62 , P = .006 ) after CRT . CONCLUSION Among patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure receiving CRT , AVN ablation for definitive biventricular pacing provides greater improvement in NYHA class and survival benefit . Larger-scale r and omized trials are needed to assess the clinical and survival outcomes of this therapy Background —Atrioventricular nodal radiofrequency ablation ( AVNA ) with permanent ventricular pacing can be used to control rate in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . However , long-term outcomes after AVNA are uncertain , especially in light of irreversible pacemaker dependence . Methods and Results —We examined 9122 consecutive patients with AF . The outcomes in 453 patients with AVNA ( 26 % of whom underwent an implantable cardiac defibrillator implant and 37 % underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy implant ) were compared with AF patients without AVNA after propensity score 1:1 matching . During follow-up in the propensity-matched cohort ( 2.41±3.23 years , median 1.23 , quartiles 0.33–3.12 ) , 100 patients died ( yearly rate of death 6.6 % ) . Mode of death was available in 86 % of patients , which was cardiovascular in 67 % of the patients ( related to heart failure in 38 % , sudden death in 5 % , and other cardiovascular reason in 24 % ) and noncardiovascular in 33 % . AVNA in patients with AF was associated with a lower risk of mortality ( odds ratio 0.47 , 95 % confidence interval , 0.29–0.77 ; P=0.003 ) , a lower risk of cardiovascular mortality ( odds ratio = 0.41 , 95 % confidence interval 0.23–0.73 ; P=0.003 ) , and nonsignificant lower risk of stroke and thromboembolic events ( odds ratio = 0.61 , 95 % confidence interval 0.36–1.06 ; P=0.08 ) . Conclusions —In sick AF patients with multiple comorbidities  , AVNA with permanent ventricular pacing for rate control seems safe during follow-up and may be associated with lower mortality OBJECTIVES This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction ( HFPEF ) . BACKGROUND AF is a precipitating factor for clinical deterioration of HFPEF . METHODS Catheter ablation for AF was performed in a consecutive 74 patients with compensated HFPEF ( left ventricular [ LV ] ejection fraction > 50 % ) . AF-free probability after catheter ablation and factors relating to maintenance of sinus rhythm were investigated . LV strain and strain rate were assessed by echocardiography at baseline and over 12 months after ablation . RESULTS During a 34 ± 16-month follow-up period , single- and multiple-procedure drug-free success rates were 27 % ( n = 20 ) and 45 % ( n = 33 ) , respectively . Multiple procedures and pharmaceutically assisted success rate was 73 % ( n = 54 ) . No major complications occurred during follow-up . Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that AF type ( other than long-st and ing persistent AF ) and lack of hypertension were independently associated with maintenance of sinus rhythm ( hazard ratio [ HR ] : 1.81 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 1.03 to 3.17 , p = 0.04 ; HR : 0.49 , 95 % CI : 0.24 to 0.96 , p = 0.04 , respectively ) . LV systolic indices ( LV ejection fraction , LV strain/strain rate at systole ) and diastolic indices ( E/E ' , ratio of LV strain rate at diastole with early transmitral flow ) were improved only in patients maintaining sinus rhythm at follow-up . CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that AF can be effectively and safely treated with a composite of repeat procedures and pharmaceuticals in patients with HFPEF . However , the current study was a single-arm analysis ; therefore , larger r and omized control studies are needed to verify the benefit of AF ablation in this cohort BACKGROUND Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins by catheter ablation is an emerging treatment modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and is increasingly used in patients with heart failure . METHODS The catheter ablation versus st and ard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation trial ( CASTLE-AF ) is a r and omized evaluation of ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction . The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality or worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization using a time to first event analysis . Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality , cardiovascular mortality , cerebrovascular accidents , worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization , unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason , all-cause hospitalization , quality of life , number of therapies ( shock and antitachycardia pacing ) delivered by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ( ICD ) , time to first ICD therapy , number of device-detected ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation episodes , AF burden , AF free interval , left ventricular function , exercise tolerance , and percentage of right ventricular pacing . CASTLE-AF will r and omize 420 patients for a minimum of 3 years at 48 sites in the United States , Europe , Australia , and South America
Surrogate outcomes showed a similar benefit favoring CA .
Conclusion and Relevance Catheter ablation for AF in HFrEF is associated with improvement in patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes when compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy
Background Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) among patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) is associated with adverse clinical outcomes .
Our primary aim was to evaluate patient-centered outcomes and surrogate outcomes following catheter ablation ( CA ) of AF among patients with HFrEF compared to st and ard medical therapy with or without device therapy ( atrioventricular node ablation and cardiac resynchronization therapy ) .