Atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: Role of catheter ablation therapies. Maintenance of sinus rhythm and survival in patients with heart failure and atrial fibrillation. Effects of atrial fibrillation on long-term outcomes in patients hospitalized for heart failure in Japan: a report from the Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology (JCARE-CARD). Exercise Training in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation. 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Heart Rate and Cardiac Rhythm Relationships With Bisoprolol Benefit in Chronic Heart Failure in CIBIS II Trial Rhythm control versus rate control for atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Comparison of rate and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and nonischemic heart failure. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure in cardiology practice: reciprocal impact and combined management from the perspective of atrial fibrillation: results of the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation. Dofetilide in patients with congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction: safety aspects and effect on atrial fibrillation. The Danish Investigators of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide (DIAMOND) Study Group. Outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the COMPANION trial. A randomised, controlled study of rate versus rhythm control in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation and heart failure: (CAFÉ-II Study) Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction: results from the Candesartan in Heart failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) program. Quality of life and functional capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure. Clinical course of recent-onset atrial fibrillation treated with oral propafenone. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Catheter Ablation Versus Medical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure (The CAMTAF Trial) Real-life observations of clinical outcomes with rhythm- and rate-control therapies for atrial fibrillation RECORDAF (Registry on Cardiac Rhythm Disorders Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation). Dofetilide in patients with congestive heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide Study Group. New atrial fibrillation after acute myocardial infarction independently predicts death: the GUSTO-III experience. Atrial fibrillation and amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide as independent predictors of prognosis in systolic heart failure. A randomized trial to assess catheter ablation versus rate control in the management of persistent atrial fibrillation in heart failure. Progression of atrial fibrillation in the REgistry on Cardiac rhythm disORDers assessing the control of Atrial Fibrillation cohort: clinical correlates and the effect of rhythm-control therapy. Efficacy of Dofetilide in the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation-Flutter in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function: A Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON Dofetilide (DIAMOND) Substudy Valsartan reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Sinus rhythm restoration by catheter ablation in patients with long-lasting atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure: impact of the left ventricular ejection fraction improvement on the implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion indication. Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. Ibutilide to expedite ED therapy for recent-onset atrial fibrillation flutter. Detection of atrial high-rate events by continuous Home Monitoring: clinical significance in the heart failure–cardiac resynchronization therapy population Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation: a 2-year follow-up study. Catheter ablation versus standard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation (CASTLE-AF) - study design. Effects of rosuvastatin on atrial fibrillation occurrence: ancillary results of the GISSI-HF trial.
Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) represents the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) . AF in HF patients is associated with worsening of symptoms and also results in a substantial increase in mortality . Although HF patients in sinus rhythm have a better outcome than patients with AF , several r and omized studies investigating pharmacological rhythm control versus rate control have shown no advantage of one strategy over the other in terms of patient outcomes . Catheter-based ablation therapy is a newer therapeutic option with a rapidly evolving and changing role in the management of this arrhythmia . In the present review , the authors discuss the epidemiology , pathophysiology and prognostic significance of AF in patients with HF . Exclusively addressed are studies investigating catheter-based ablation for rhythm-control and rate-control therapies in the management of AF in HF patients OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the presence of sinus rhythm and outcomes in patients with a history of congestive heart failure ( CHF ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) . BACKGROUND The value of sinus rhythm maintenance in patients with AF and heart failure ( HF ) is uncertain . METHODS A total of 1,376 patients with AF , ejection fraction < or = 35 % , and heart failure symptoms were r and omized to a rhythm- or rate-control strategy .  Detailed efficacy analyses were used to evaluate the independent effects of treatment strategy and the presence of sinus rhythm on cardiovascular outcomes . RESULTS Overall , 445 ( 32 % ) patients died and 402 ( 29 % ) experienced worsening HF . The rhythm-control strategy was not predictive of cardiovascular mortality ( hazard ratio [ HR ] : 0.90 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 0.70 to 1.16 ; p = 0.41 ) , all-cause death ( HR : 0.86 , 95 % CI : 0.69 to 1.08 ; p = 0.19 ) , or worsening HF ( HR : 0.86 , 95 % CI : 0.68 to 1.10 ; p = 0.23 ) . In analyses devised to isolate the effect of underlying rhythm , sinus rhythm was not associated with cardiovascular mortality [ HR : 1.22 , 95 % CI : 0.80 to 1.87 ; p = 0.35 ) , total mortality [ HR : 1.11 , 95 % CI : 0.78 to 1.58 ; p = 0.57 ) , or worsening HF [ HR : 0.62 , 95 % CI : 0.37 to 1.02 ; p = 0.059 ) . CONCLUSIONS A rhythm-control strategy or the presence of sinus rhythm are not associated with better outcomes in patients with AF and CHF BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) , but its prognostic importance is controversial . The effect of AF on long-term outcomes , including mortality and rehospitalization , among unselected HF patients hospitalized with HF in routine clinical practice in Japan was assessed in the present study . METHODS AND RESULTS The Japanese Cardiac Registry of Heart Failure in Cardiology ( JCARE-CARD ) prospect ively studied the characteristics and treatment strategies of a broad sample of patients hospitalized with worsening HF and the outcomes were followed with an average of 2.4 years of follow-up . The study cohort ( n=2,659 ) was grouped according to the presence ( n=937 ; 35.2 % ) or absence ( n=1,722 ; 64.8 % ) of AF at baseline . After multivariable adjustment , patients with and without AF had a comparable risk for all-cause death ( adjusted hazard ratio ( HR ) 0.931 , 95 % confidence interval ( CI ) 0.690 - 1.258 , P=0.643 ) , cardiac death ( adjusted HR 0.949 , 95%CI 0.655 - 1.377 , P=0.784 ) , rehospitalization because of the worsening HF ( adjusted HR 1.028 , 95%CI 0.816 - 1.295 , P=0.816 ) , and all-cause death or rehospitalization ( adjusted HR 1.039 , 95%CI 0.842 - 1.281 , P=0.722 ) . CONCLUSIONS Among patients hospitalized for HF in Japan , AF was common , but was not an independent risk for long-term adverse outcomes , including death or rehospitalization , in routine clinical practice BACKGROUND The safety and efficacy of aerobic exercise in heart failure ( HF ) patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) has not been well evaluated . OBJECTIVES This study examined whether outcomes with exercise training in HF vary according to AF status . METHODS HF-ACTION ( Heart Failure : A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training ) r and omized 2,331 ambulatory HF patients with ejection fraction ≤35 % to exercise training or usual care .  We examined clinical characteristics and outcomes ( mortality/hospitalization ) by baseline AF status ( past history of AF or AF on baseline electrocardiogram vs. no AF ) using adjusted Cox models and explored an interaction with exercise training . We assessed post-r and omization AF events diagnosed via hospitalizations for AF and reports of serious arrhythmia caused by AF . RESULTS Of 2,292 patients with baseline rhythm data , 382 ( 17 % ) had AF , 1,602 ( 70 % ) had sinus rhythm , and 308 ( 13 % ) had " other " rhythm . Patients with AF were older and had lower peak Vo2 . Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years , AF was associated with a 24 % per year higher rate of mortality/hospitalization ( hazard ratio [ HR ] : 1.53 ; 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] : 1.34 to 1.74 ; p < 0.001 ) in unadjusted analysis ; this did not remain significant after adjustment ( HR : 1.15 ; 95 % CI : 0.98 to 1.35 ; p = 0.09 ) . There was no significant difference in AF event rates by r and omized treatment assignment in the overall population or by baseline AF status ( all p > 0.10 ) . There was no interaction between AF and exercise training on measures of functional status or clinical outcomes ( all p > 0.10 ) . CONCLUSIONS AF in patients with chronic HF was associated with older age , reduced exercise capacity at baseline , and a higher overall rate of clinical events , but not a differential response to exercise training for clinical outcomes or changes in exercise capacity . ( Heart Failure : A Controlled Trial Investigating Outcomes of Exercise Training [ HF-ACTION ] ; NCT00047437 ) ACCF : American College of Cardiology Foundation ACCP : American College of Chest Physicians ACS : acute coronary syndrome ACT : Atrial arrhythmia Conversion Trial ADONIS : American – Australian – African trial with DronedarONe In atrial fibrillation or flutter for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm AF : atrial fibrillation AHA : American Heart Association AND ROMEDA : ANtiarrhythmic trial with DROnedarone in Moderate-to-severe congestive heart failure Evaluating morbidity DecreAse APHRS : Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society aPTT : activated partial thromboplastin time ARB : angiotensin-receptor blocker ARISTOTLE : Apixaban for Reduction In STroke and Other ThromboemboLic Events in atrial fibrillation ATHENA : A placebo-controlled , double-blind , parallel arm Trial to assess the efficacy of dronedarone 400 mg b.i.d . for the prevention of cardiovascular Hospitalization or death from any cause in patiENts with Atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter ATRIA : AnTicoagulation and Risk factors In Atrial fibrillation AVERROES : Apixaban VErsus acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) to Reduce the Rate Of Embolic Stroke in atrial fibrillation patients who have failed or are unsuitable for vitamin K antagonist treatment AVRO : A prospect i ve , r and omized , double-blind , Active-controlled , superiority study of Vernakalant vs. amiodarone in Recent Onset atrial fibrillation b.i.d : bis in die ( twice daily ) b.p.m . : beats per minute CABANA : Catheter ABlation vs . ANtiarrhythmic drug therapy for Atrial fibrillation CABG : coronary artery bypass graft CAP : Continued Access to Protect AF CHA2DS2-VASc : Congestive heart failure or left ventricular dysfunction Hypertension , Age ≥75 ( doubled ) , Diabetes , Stroke (doubled)-Vascular disease , Age 65–74 , Sex category ( female ) CHADS2 : Congestive heart failure , Hypertension , Age ≥75 , Diabetes , Stroke ( doubled ) CI : confidence interval CRAFT : Controlled R and omized Atrial Fibrillation Trial CrCl : creatinine clearance DAFNE : Dronedarone Atrial FibrillatioN study after Electrical cardioversion DIONYSOS : R and omized Double blind trIal to evaluate efficacy and safety of drOnedarone ( 400 mg b.i.d . ) vs . amiodaroNe ( 600 mg q.d . for 28 daYS , then 200 mg qd thereafter ) for at least 6 mOnths for the maintenance of Sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation EAST : Early treatment of Atrial fibrillation for Stroke prevention Trial EHRA : European Heart Rhythm Association ECG : electrocardiogram EMA : European Medicines Agency ERATO : Efficacy and safety of dRonedArone for The cOntrol of ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation EURIDIS : EURopean trial In atrial fibrillation or flutter patients receiving Dronedarone for the maIntenance of Sinus rhythm FAST : atrial Fibrillation catheter Ablation vs . Surgical ablation Treatment FDA : Food and Drug Administration Flec-SL : Flecainide Short-Long trial HAS-BLED : Hypertension , Abnormal renal/liver function , Stroke , Bleeding history or predisposition , Labile INR , Elderly , Drugs/alcohol concomitantly HF-PEF : heart failure with preserved ejection fraction HF-REF : heart failure with reduced ejection fraction HR : hazard ratio HRS : Heart Rhythm Society ICH : intracranial haemorrhage INR : international normalized ratio i.v . : intravenous J-RHYTHM : Japanese RHYTHM management trial for atrial fibrillation LAA : left atrial appendage LoE : level of evidence LVEF : left ventricular ejection fraction MANTRA-PAF : Medical ANtiarrhythmic Treatment or Radiofrequency Ablation in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation NICE : National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence NOAC : novel oral anticoagulant NSAID : non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug NYHA : New York Heart Association OAC : oral anticoagulant or oral anticoagulation o.d . : omni die ( every day ) PALLAS : Permanent Atrial fibriLLAtion outcome Study using dronedarone on top of st and ard therapy PCI : percutaneous coronary intervention PREVAIL : Prospect i ve R and omized EVAluation of the LAA closure device In patients with atrial fibrillation v s. Long-term warfarin therapy PROTECT AF : WATCHMAN LAA system for embolic PROTECTion in patients with Atrial Fibrillation PT : prothrombin time RAAFT : Radio frequency Ablation Atrial Fibrillation Trial RE-LY : R and omized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY with dabigatran etexilate ROCKET-AF : Rivaroxaban Once daily oral direct factor Xa inhibition Compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and Embolism Trial in atrial fibrillation RRR : relative risk reduction TE : thromboembolism TIA : transient ischaemic attack t.i.d . : ter in die ( three times daily ) TOE : transoesophageal echocardiogram TTR : time in therapeutic range VKA : vitamin K antagonist Guidelines summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim of assisting physicians in selecting the best management strategy for an individual patient suffering from a given condition , taking into account the impact on Background —&bgr;-Blockade – induced benefit in heart failure ( HF ) could be related to baseline heart rate and treatment-induced heart rate reduction , but no such relationships have been demonstrated . Methods and Results —In CIBIS II , we studied the relationships between baseline heart rate ( BHR ) , heart rate changes at 2 months ( HRC ) ,  nature of cardiac rhythm ( sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation )  , and outcomes ( mortality and hospitalization for HF ) . Multivariate analysis of CIBIS II showed that in addition to & bgr;-blocker treatment , BHR and HRC were both significantly related to survival and hospitalization for worsening HF , the lowest BHR and the greatest HRC being associated with best survival and reduction of hospital admissions . No interaction between the 3 variables was observed , meaning that on one h and , HRC-related improvement in survival was similar at all levels of BHR , and on the other h and , bisoprolol-induced benefit over placebo for survival was observed to a similar extent at any level of both BHR and HRC . Bisoprolol  reduced mortality in patients with sinus rhythm ( relative risk 0.58 , P < 0.001 ) but not in patients with atrial fibrillation ( relative risk 1.16 , P = NS ) . A similar result was observed for cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for HF worsening . Conclusions —BHR and HRC are significantly related to prognosis in heart failure . & bgr;-Blockade with bisoprolol further improves survival at any level of BHR and HRC and to a similar extent . The benefit of bisoprolol is question able , however , in patients with atrial fibrillation BACKGROUND It is common practice to restore and maintain sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure . This approach is based in part on data indicating that atrial fibrillation is a predictor of death in patients with heart failure and suggesting that the suppression of atrial fibrillation may favorably affect the outcome . However , the benefits and risks of this approach have not been adequately studied . METHODS We conducted a multicenter , r and omized trial comparing the maintenance of sinus rhythm ( rhythm control ) with control of the ventricular rate ( rate control ) in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 % or less , symptoms of congestive heart failure , and a history of atrial fibrillation . The primary outcome was the time to death from cardiovascular causes . RESULTS A total of 1376 patients were enrolled ( 682 in the rhythm-control group and 694 in the rate-control group ) and were followed for a mean of 37 months . Of these patients , 182 ( 27 % ) in the rhythm-control group died from cardiovascular causes , as compared with 175 ( 25 % ) in the rate-control group ( hazard ratio in the rhythm-control group , 1.06 ; 95 % confidence interval , 0.86 to 1.30 ; P=0.59 by the log-rank test ) . Secondary outcomes were similar in the two groups , including death from any cause ( 32 % in the rhythm-control group and 33 % in the rate-control group ) , stroke ( 3 % and 4 % , respectively ) , worsening heart failure ( 28 % and 31 % ) , and the composite of death from cardiovascular causes , stroke , or worsening heart failure ( 43 % and 46 % ) . There were also no significant differences favoring either strategy in any predefined subgroup . CONCLUSIONS In patients with atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure , a routine strategy of rhythm control does not reduce the rate of death from cardiovascular causes , as compared with a rate-control strategy . ( Clinical Trials.gov number , NCT00597077 . Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a very common cardiac arrhythmia with an increased mortality in patients with heart failure . Whether the best therapeutic approach to these patients is to restore sinus rhythm or to adequately control the ventricular rate is still controversial . The aim of this study was to compare both strategies in patients with AF and nonischemic heart failure . One hundred and fifty-four patients with AF duration greater than 48 hours and nonischemic left ventricular dysfunction were r and omized either to a rhythm ( n = 84 ) or rate ( n = 74 ) control group . The composite end points of the study were embolism , death , and exercise capacity .  The average age of the patients was 61 + /- 10 years in the rhythm control group and 58 + /- 12 years in the rate control group ( P = NS ) . The average follow-up period was 35 + /- 21 months in the rhythm control group and 37 + /- 19 months in the rate control group ( P = NS ) . In the first year of the study , exercise capacity and left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) were improved in the rhythm control group compared to the exercise capacity and LVEF of the rate control group ( P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0005 , respectively ) . There were no statistically significant differences in the embolic event rate between the two groups ( P = NS ) . The mortality rate , especially for death due to pump failure , was significantly higher in the rate control group at the end of the study ( P < 0.0001 ) . Restoring and maintaining sinus rhythm had a beneficial effect on mortality and exercise capacity in patients with nonischemic heart failure and AF OBJECTIVES Our aim was to identify shortcomings in the management of patients with both atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and heart failure ( HF ) . BACKGROUND AF and HF often coincide in cardiology practice , and they are known to worsen each other 's prognosis , but little is known about the quality of care of this combination . METHODS In the observational Euro Heart Survey on AF , 5,333 AF patients were enrolled in 182 centers across 35 European Society of Cardiology member countries in 2003 and 2004 . A follow-up survey was performed after 1 year . RESULTS At baseline , 1,816 patients ( 34 % ) had HF .  Recommended therapy for HF with left ventricular systolic dysfunction ( LVSD ) with a beta-blocker and either an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor ( ACEI ) or angiotensin II receptor blocker was prescribed in 40 % of HF patients , while 29 % received the recommended drug therapy for both LVSD-HF and AF , consisting of the combination of a beta-blocker , either ACEI or angiotensin II receptor blocker , and oral anticoagulation .  Rate control was insufficient with 40 % of all HF patients with permanent AF having a heart rate < or = 80 beats/min . In the total cohort , HF patients had a higher risk for mortality ( 9.5 % vs. 3.3 % ; p < 0.001 ) , ( progression of ) HF ( 24.8 % vs. 5.0 % ; p < 0.001 ) , and AF progression ( 35 % vs. 19 % ; p < 0.001 ) during 1-year follow-up . Of all recommended drugs for AF and LVSD-HF , only ACEI prescription was associated with improved survival during 1-year follow-up ( odds ratio : 0.51 [ 95 % confidence interval : 0.31 to 0.85 ] ; p = 0.011 ) . CONCLUSIONS The prescription rate of guideline -recommended drug therapy for AF and LVSD-HF is low . R and omized controlled trials targeting this highly prevalent subgroup with AF and HF are warranted INTRODUCTION . Atrial fibrillation is a frequent cause of worsening of symptoms in patients with congestive heart failure . The drugs currently available for maintenance of sinus rhythm all have major side effects . METHODS . In 34 Danish coronary care units , 1518 patients with congestive heart failure and reduced left ventricular systolic function were r and omized to receive either placebo or a new class III antiarrhythmic drug , dofetilide . The dose of dofetilide was adjusted according to the presence of atrial fibrillation , the length of the QT interval , and renal function . Patients were continuously monitored electrocardiographically for the first 3 days of the study . The primary end point was all-cause mortality and follow-up was for at least 1 year . RESULTS . In the dofetilide/placebo groups , 311/317 patients  died ( 41%/42 % ) . The hazard ratio for dofetilide treatment was 0.95 ( 95 % confidence interval , 0.81 - 1.11 ) . Treatment with dofetilide reduced worsening of heart failure significantly ( hazard ratio , 0.75 ; 0.63 - 0.89 ) . After 1 year , 61 % of patients with atrial fibrillation at the start of the study had converted to sinus rhythm on dofetilide , vs. 33 % in the placebo group . After conversion to sinus rhythm , 78%/43 % of patients in the dofetilide/placebo groups remained in sinus rhythm for at least 1 year . There were 25 instances ( 3 % ) of torsade de pointes ventricular tachycardia in the dofetilide group and none in the placebo group . CONCLUSION . In patients with congestive heart failure , dofetilide can effectively convert atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm and maintain sinus rhythm after conversion . Hospitalization for congestive heart failure is reduced . Dofetilide does not affect mortality . (c)2001 by CHF , BACKGROUND Controlled clinical trial data are lacking for cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure ( HF ) from reduced left ventricular ejection fraction ( HFrEF ) and intermittent atrial fibrillation or flutter ( IAF/AFL ) . OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to describe CRT outcomes in patients with IAF/AFL and advanced HF . METHODS HF outcomes in patients in the COMPANION ( Comparison of Medical Therapy , Pacing , and Defibrillation in Heart Failure ) trial with New York Heart Association class III or IV HFrEF , left ventricular ejection fraction ≤0.35 , sinus rhythm at r and omization , and no history of baseline arrhythmia were compared with those with a history of IAF/AFL . RESULTS In those with no history of baseline arrhythmia ( n = 887 ) , compared with optimal pharmacological therapy ( OPT ) with no CRT , the CRT + OPT arms exhibited a significant reduction in the end points of death or any hospitalization ( hazard ratio [ HR ] 0.73 [ 95 % Confidence Interval ( CI ) : 0.60 to 0.89 ] ; P = .002 ) and death or HF hospitalization ( HR 0.53 [ 95 % CI : 0.41 to 0.68 ] ; P < .001 ) . In contrast , in the IAF/AFL subgroup ( n = 293 ) , CRT did not result in improved outcomes compared with OPT ( death or any hospitalization : HR 1.16 [ 95 % CI : 0.83 to 1.63 ] ; P = .38 ; death or HF hospitalization : HR 0.97 [ 95 % CI : 0.64 to 1.46 ] ; P = .88 ) . The interaction between history of AF/AFL and CRT was statistically significant for both outcomes ( P < .05 ) . CONCLUSION In the COMPANION trial , patients with moderate to severe HFrEF and a history of IAF/AFL had no benefit from CRT Background : Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and heart failure ( HF ) often coexist . The aim was to investigate whether restoring sinus rhythm ( SR ) could improve cardiac function , symptoms , exercise capacity and quality of life ( QoL ) in patients with chronic heart failure . Methods : Patients with HF and persistent AF receiving guideline -recommended treatments , including anticoagulants , were eligible for the study . Patients were r and omised to either rhythm ( treated with amiodarone for at least 3 months prior to attempting biphasic external cardioversion and continued amiodarone long-term if SR was restored ) or rate control . Anticoagulants were continued throughout the study regardless of rhythm , unless contraindications developed . Both groups were treated with beta blockers and /or digoxin to reduce the heart rate to < 80 bpm at rest and < 110 bpm after walking . Symptoms , walk distance ( 6-minute corridor walk test , 6MWT ) , QoL and cardiac function were assessed at baseline and 1 year . Results : 61 patients with HF and persistent AF ( median duration 14 months ( IQR 5 to 32 ) ) were r and omly assigned to a rate or rhythm control strategy . Of patients assigned to rhythm control ( n = 30 ) , 66 % were in SR at 1 year , and 90 % of those assigned to rate control ( n = 31 ) achieved the heart rate target . At 1 year , NYHA class ( p = 0.424 ) and 6MWT distance ( p = 0.342 ) were similar between groups but patients assigned to rhythm control had improved LV function ( p = 0.014 ) , NT-proBNP concentration ( p = 0.046 ) and QoL ( p = 0.019 ) compared with those assigned to rate control . Greatest improvement was seen in patients in whom SR was maintained . Conclusion : Restoring SR in patients with AF and heart failure may improve QoL and LV function when compared with a strategy of rate control OBJECTIVES We assessed the risk of adverse cardiovascular ( CV ) outcomes associated with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in the C and esartan in Heart failure- Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity ( CHARM ) program , which enrolled patients with chronic heart failure ( CHF ) and a broad range of ejection fractions ( EFs ) . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of adverse CV outcomes in patients with CHF and reduced EF . The risk of AF in patients with CHF and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction ( PEF ) is unknown . METHODS A total of 7,599 patients with symptomatic CHF were r and omized to c and esartan or placebo . Patients were divided by baseline EF ( < or = 40 % or > 40 % ) in low or preserved EF groups . Major outcomes were cardiovascular death or hospitalization for worsening heart failure , and all-cause mortality . Median follow-up was 37.7 months . RESULTS A total of 670 ( 17 % ) patients in the low EF group and 478 ( 19 % ) in the PEF group had AF at baseline . Atrial fibrillation predicted a high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality regardless of baseline EF . Patients with AF and low EF had the highest absolute risk for adverse CV outcomes . However , AF was associated with greater relative increased risk of the major outcomes in patients with PEF than in patients with low EF : hazard ratio 1.72 ( 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.45 to 2.06 ) versus 1.29 ( 95 % CI 1.14 to 1.46 ) , respectively . The same was true for the risk of all-cause mortality . C and esartan was associated with similar treatment effects regardless of baseline rhythm . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of CV outcomes in patients with CHF and either reduced EF or PEF . C and esartan improved outcomes similarly regardless of baseline rhythm OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the impact of rhythm- versus rate-control treatment strategies and of underlying rhythm on quality of life and functional capacity in patients with atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and congestive heart failure ( CHF ) . BACKGROUND Although intention-to-treat and efficacy analyses have demonstrated similar cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF and CHF r and omized to rhythm or rate control , effects on quality of life remain to be determined . METHODS The AF-CHF ( Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure ) trial r and omized 1,376 patients to rhythm- or rate-control strategies .  For this pre-specified sub study , Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 question naires were administered at baseline and 4 months . Six-min walk tests were conducted at baseline , 3 weeks , 4 months , and 1 year . RESULTS Quality of life improved across all domains to a similar extent with rhythm and rate control . However , a higher proportion of time spent in sinus rhythm was associated with a modestly greater improvement in quality of life scores . Six-min walk distance ( p = 0.2328 ) and New York Heart Association functional class ( p = 0.1712 ) improved to a similar degree with rhythm and rate control . A higher proportion of time spent in sinus rhythm was associated with a greater improvement in New York Heart Association functional class ( p < 0.0001 ) but not in 6-min walk distance ( p = 0.1308 ) . CONCLUSIONS Improvements in quality of life and functional capacity were similar in patients with AF and CHF r and omized to rhythm- versus rate-control strategies . By contrast , sinus rhythm was associated with beneficial effects on New York Heart Association functional class and modest gains in quality of life . ( Atrial Fibrillation and Congestive Heart Failure [ AF-CHF ] ; NCT88597077 ) Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is one of the most common cardiac arrhythmias in the adult population .  Propafenone is a class 1c antiarrhythmic agent that has an electrophysiologic profile suggesting that it might be potentially effective in recent-onset AF . The present study was undertaken , therefore , to examine the time course as well as the frequency of successful conversion in patients with recent-onset AF treated with propafenone administered orally . Fifty patients with recent-onset AF were recruited into 2 groups : 25 patients were given propafenone , 150 mg every 4 h , and 25 patients served as a control group and received verapamil ( a drug known to slow the ventricular response but not to restore sinus rhythm ) 40 mg , every 4 h and up to 48 h or until conversion to sinus rhythm occurred . Of the 50 patients , 2 refused to continue the study and another 2 were excluded because of left heart failure . Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 21 of 24 patients ( 87 percent ) in the propafenone group as compared with 9 of 22 ( 41 percent ) in the verapamil group ( p < 0.001 ) . In 10 patients in the propafenone group , conversion occurred within 12 h , within 24 h in another 9 patients , and between 24 and 48 h in the remaining 2 patients . There was no correlation between the duration of AF prior to entry into the study and the subsequent incidence of and time to conversion with propafenone . With respect to cause of AF , all groups showed a high incidence of conversion . Two patients developed heart failure during treatment and one patient ( in the verapamil group ) developed embolic stroke while still having atrial fibrillation . We conclude that in patients with AF , the prognosis for conversion to sinus rhythm within 48 h , with propafenone , is excellent ( 87 percent ) and safe Background —Restoring sinus rhythm in patients with heart failure ( HF ) and atrial fibrillation ( AF ) may improve left ventricular ( LV ) function and HF symptoms . We sought to compare the effect of a catheter ablation strategy with that of a medical rate control strategy in patients with persistent AF and HF . Methods and Results — Patients with persistent AF , symptomatic HF , and LV ejection fraction < 50 % were r and omized to catheter ablation or medical rate control . The primary end-point was the difference between groups in LV ejection fraction at 6 months . Baseline LV ejection fraction was 32±8 % in the ablation group and 34±12 % in the medical group . Twenty-six patients underwent catheter ablation  , and 24 patients were rate controlled .  Freedom from AF was achieved in 21/26 ( 81 % ) at 6 months off antiarrhythmic drugs . LV ejection fraction at 6 months in the ablation group was 40±12 % compared with 31±13 % in the rate control group ( P=0.015 ) . Ablation was associated with better peak oxygen consumption ( 22±6 versus 18±6 mL/kg per minute ; P=0.014 ) and Minnesota living with HF question naire score ( 24±22 versus 47±22 ; P=0.001 ) compared with rate control . Conclusions —Catheter ablation is effective in restoring sinus rhythm in selected patients with persistent AF and HF , and can improve LV function , functional capacity , and HF symptoms compared with rate control . Clinical Trial Registration —URL : http://www . clinical trials.gov . Unique identifier : OBJECTIVES RECORDAF is the first worldwide , prospect i ve , observational survey of management of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in unselected , community-based patients . BACKGROUND Primary outcomes were therapeutic success and clinical outcomes associated with rhythm-control and rate-control strategies . METHODS Patients with recent-onset AF were included ( n = 5,604 ) . Treatment strategy ( rhythm control or rate control ) was noted at baseline . Follow-up was 12 months . Therapeutic success required that strategy was unchanged without clinical events . Further maintenance of sinus rhythm was required in the rhythm-control group , and heart rate ≤80 beats/min in the rate-control group . RESULTS Data from 5,171 patients were assessable . Therapeutic success was 54 % overall ( rhythm control 60 % vs. rate control 47 % ) , a result driven by control of AF : rhythm control , 81 % vs. rate control , 74 % . After adjustment for propensity score quintiles , the rhythm-control strategy was significantly related to superior therapeutic success ( odds ratio : 1.34 , 95 % confidence interval : 1.15 to 1.55 ; p = 0.0002 ) . Clinical events occurred in 18 % of patients . The arrhythmia management strategy was not predictive of clinical events . The type ( persistent ) , presence at baseline visit , and duration ( > 3 months ) of AF , together with age older than 75 years and the presence of heart failure , predicted progression to permanent AF . The choice of rhythm control reduced the likelihood of AF progression ( odds ratio : 0.20 , 95 % confidence interval : 0.17 to 0.25 ; p < 0.0001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Clinical outcomes in AF patients were driven mainly by hospitalizations for arrhythmia/proarrhythmia and other cardiovascular causes , but not by the choice of rate or rhythm strategy . Rhythm-control patients progressed less rapidly to permanent AF BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation occurs frequently in patients with congestive heart failure and commonly results in clinical deterioration and hospitalization . Sinus rhythm may be maintained with antiarrhythmic drugs , but some of these drugs increase the risk of death . METHODS We studied 1518 patients with symptomatic congestive heart failure and severe left ventricular dysfunction at 34 Danish hospitals . We r and omly assigned 762 patients to receive dofetilide , a novel class III antiarrhythmic agent , and 756 to receive placebo in a double-blind study . Treatment was initiated in the hospital and included three days of cardiac monitoring and dose adjustment . The primary end point was death from any cause . RESULTS During a median follow-up of 18 months , 311 patients in the dofetilide group ( 41 percent ) and 317 patients in the placebo group ( 42 percent ) died ( hazard ratio , 0.95 ; 95 percent confidence interval , 0.81 to 1.11 ) . Treatment with dofetilide significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for worsening congestive heart failure ( risk ratio , 0.75 ; 95 percent confidence interval , 0.63 to 0.89 ) . Dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm . After one month , 22 of 190 patients with atrial fibrillation at base line ( 12 percent ) had sinus rhythm restored with dofetilide , as compared with only 3 of 201 patients ( 1 percent ) given placebo . Once sinus rhythm was restored , dofetilide was significantly more effective than placebo in maintaining sinus rhythm ( hazard ratio for the recurrence of atrial fibrillation , 0.35 ; 95 percent confidence interval , 0.22 to 0.57 ; P<0.001 ) . There were 25 cases of torsade de pointes in the dofetilide group ( 3.3 percent ) as compared with none in the placebo group . CONCLUSIONS In patients with congestive heart failure and reduced left ventricular function , dofetilide was effective in converting atrial fibrillation , preventing its recurrence , and reducing the risk of hospitalization for worsening heart failure .  Dofetilide had no effect on mortality BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) or flutter occurring after myocardial infa rct ion may occur alone or in association with other complications . Whether the arrhythmia portends a poor prognosis independent of other complications with contemporary therapy is unknown . METHODS AND RESULTS As part of the Global Use of Strategies To Open occluded coronary arteries ( GUSTO-III ) trial , we evaluated whether postinfa rct ion complications were associated with the subsequent development of  AF  and whether AF independently predicted death over periods of 30 days and 1 year . Information including exact timing was collected on deaths and major in-hospital postinfa rct ion complications up to 30 days . Of the 13,858 patients with sinus rhythm at enrollment , 906 later had AF or flutter and 12 , 952 did not . We compared outcomes between these 2 groups , adjusting for differences in baseline characteristics and prefibrillation complications . Worsening heart failure , hypotension , third-degree heart block , and ventricular fibrillation were independent predictors of new-onset AF . The unadjusted odds ratio ( OR ) for death among patients with versus those without AF was 2.74 ( 95 % confidence interval [ 95 % CI ] , 2.56 - 3.34 ) . After adjusting for baseline differences , the OR was reduced to 1.63 ( 95 % CI , 1.31 - 2.02 ) . Adjustment for other in-hospital complications before the onset of AF further reduced the OR to 1.49 ( 95 % CI , 1.17 - 1.89 ) . CONCLUSIONS Atrial fibrillation or flutter occurs secondary to other postinfa rct ion complications but independently portends a worse prognosis . Prevention and management may improve outcome BACKGROUND Survival of patients with systolic heart failure ( HF ) may be influenced by the presence of  chronic atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and circulating concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptides . In this study , we sought to assess the prognostic value of chronic AF in comparison to those of amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide ( NT-proBNP ) plasma levels and of echocardiographic parameters among HF patients of the entire study population and in those with AF . METHODS  Plasma NT-proBNP levels and echocardiography  were prospect ively assessed in 489 patients with chronic systolic HF ( LV ejection fraction < or=45 % ) in sinus rhythm or AF ( 16 % ) .  Follow-up duration was 26+/-15 months . RESULTS Patients with AF were older ( p<0.0001 ) , had a worse NYHA class ( p=0.002 ) and higher NT-proBNP levels ( p<0.0001 ) than those in sinus rhythm . Presence of AF ( HR [ hazards ratio ] : 2.01 , p=0.013 ) and plasma NT-proBNP ( HR : 3.05 , p<0.0001 ) were the only independent predictors of all-cause mortality . At receiver operating characteristic analyses , the threshold level for outcome prediction of NT-proBNP was higher in patients with AF ( 3883 pg/ml ) than in patients in sinus rhythm ( 1653 pg/ml ) . Multivariate analysis performed in patients with HF and AF showed that plasma NT-proBNP was the most important predictor of death after statistic adjustment for age . CONCLUSIONS Chronic AF and NT-proBNP independently predicted the outcome of patients with HF . The threshold level of NT-proBNP for outcome prediction was different in patients with AF with respect to those in sinus rhythm . NT-proBNP was the most important independent predictor of all-cause mortality in HF patients with AF OBJECTIVES This study sought to compare catheter ablation with rate control for persistent atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in heart failure ( HF ) . BACKGROUND The optimal therapy for AF in HF is unclear . Drug-based rhythm control has not proved clinical ly beneficial . Catheter ablation improves cardiac function in patients with HF , but impact on physiological performance has not been formally evaluated in a r and omized trial . METHODS In a r and omized , open-label , blinded-endpoint clinical trial , adults with symptomatic HF , radionuclide left ventricular ejection fraction ( EF ) ≤35 % , and persistent AF were assigned to undergo catheter ablation or rate control . Primary outcome was 12-month change in peak oxygen consumption . Secondary endpoints were quality of life , B-type natriuretic peptide , 6-min walk distance , and EF . Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat . RESULTS Fifty-two patients ( age 63 ± 9 years , EF 24 ± 8 % ) were r and omized , 26 each to ablation and rate control . At 12 months , 88 % of ablation patients maintained sinus rhythm ( single-procedure success 68 % ) . Under rate control , rate criteria were achieved in 96 % . The primary endpoint , peak oxygen consumption , significantly increased in the ablation arm compared with rate control ( difference + 3.07 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : 0.56 to 5.59 , p = 0.018 ) . The change was not evident at 3 months ( + 0.79 ml/kg/min , 95 % confidence interval : -1.01 to 2.60 , p = 0.38 ) . Ablation improved Minnesota score ( p = 0.019 ) and B-type natriuretic peptide ( p = 0.045 ) and showed nonsignificant trends toward improved 6-min walk distance ( p = 0.095 ) and EF ( p = 0.055 ) . CONCLUSIONS This first r and omized trial of ablation versus rate control to focus on objective exercise performance in AF and HF shows significant benefit from ablation , a strategy that also improves symptoms and neurohormonal status . The effects develop over 12 months , consistent with progressive amelioration of the HF syndrome . ( A R and omised Trial to Assess Catheter Ablation Versus Rate Control in the Management of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Chronic Heart Failure ; NCT00878384 ) INTRODUCTION Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ( AF ) may progress to persistent AF . We studied the clinical correlates and the effect of rhythm-control strategy on AF progression . METHODS RecordAF was a worldwide prospect i ve survey of AF management . Consecutive eligible patients with recent-onset AF were included and allocated to rate or rhythm control according to patient/physician choice . A total of 2,137 patients were followed up for 12 months . Atrial fibrillation progression was defined as a change from paroxysmal to persistent/permanent AF . RESULTS Progression of AF occurred in 318 patients ( 15 % ) after 1 year . Patients with AF progression  were older ; had a higher diastolic blood pressure ; and more often had a history of coronary artery disease , stroke or transient ischemic attack , hypertension , or heart failure . Patients treated with rhythm control were less likely to show progression than those treated only with rate control ( 164/1542 [ 11 % ] vs 154/595 [ 26 % ] , P < .001 ) . Multivariable analysis showed that history of heart failure ( odds ratio [ OR ] 2.2 , 95 % CI 1.7 - 2.9 , P < .0001 ) , history of hypertension ( OR 1.5 , 95 % CI 1.1 - 2.0 , P = .01 ) , and rate control rather than rhythm control ( OR 3.2 , 95 % CI 2.5 - 4.1 , P < .0001 ) were independent predictors of AF progression . The propensity score-adjusted OR of AF progression in patients with rate rather than rhythm control was 3.3 ( 95 % CI 2.4 - 4.6 , P < .0001 ) . CONCLUSIONS Although heart failure and hypertension are associated with AF progression , rhythm control is associated with lower risk of AF progression Background —In patients with left ventricular dysfunction , atrial fibrillation and flutter ( AF and AFl , respectively ) are common arrhythmias associated with increased morbidity and mortality . The present study investigated the potential of dofetilide in AF-AFl patients with left ventricular dysfunction to restore and maintain sinus rhythm , which might reduce mortality and hospitalizations . Methods and Results —In the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality ON  Dofetilide  ( DIAMOND ) studies , 506 patients were in AF-AFl at baseline . Over the course of study , cardioversion occurred in 148 ( 59 % ) dofetilide- and 86 ( 34 % ) placebo-treated patients . In these patients , the probability of maintaining sinus rhythm for 1 year was 79 % with dofetilide versus 42 % with placebo ( P < 0.001 ) . Dofetilide had no effect on all-cause mortality , but restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm was associated with significant reduction in mortality ( risk ratio [ RR ] , 0.44 ; 95 % CI , 0.30 to 0.64;P < 0.0001 ) . In addition , dofetilide therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk ratio versus placebo for either all-cause ( RR , 0.70 ; 95 % CI , 0.56 to 0.89;P ≤0.005 ) or congestive heart failure ( RR , 0.69 ; 95 % CI , 0.51 to 0.93;P ≤0.02 ) rehospitalization . Conclusions —Dofetilide is safe and increases the probability of obtaining and maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with structural heart disease . The present study suggests that restoration of sinus rhythm is associated with improved survival BACKGROUND  Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) in heart failure ( HF ) is generally considered a negative prognostic factor . Recent studies indicate that the incidence of AF might be decreased by renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors . The identification of a treatment to prevent its occurrence is likely to improve patients outcome . The aims of these subanalyses of Val-HeFT were to assess ( a ) the effects of valsartan in the prevention of AF , ( b ) the independent predictors of this event , and ( c ) the prognostic role of AF occurrence . METHODS AND RESULTS The occurrence of AF was evaluated based on adverse event reports in the patients with HF enrolled in Val-HeFT . Patients were r and omized to valsartan or placebo  on top of their prescribed treatments for HF . During the mean 23 months of follow-up , AF was reported in 287/4395 patients ( 6.53 % ) in sinus rhythm at baseline , of whom 113/2205 ( 5.12 % ) were allocated to valsartan and 174/2190 ( 7.95 % ) to placebo ( P = .0002 ) . Multivariable analysis showed that brain natriuretic peptide ( BNP ) levels at baseline above the median value ( HR 2.28 , 95 % CI 1.75 - 2.98 ) , age over 70 years ( HR 1.51 , 95 % CI 1.17 - 1.95 ) , male sex ( HR 1.53 , 95 % CI 1.07 - 2.18 ) , and the valsartan treatment ( HR 0.63 , 95 % CI 0.49 - 0.81 ) were independently associated with AF occurrence . Cox multivariable regression analysis showed that occurrence of AF was independently associated with a worse prognosis , with the adjusted hazard risks for all-cause mortality and combined mortality/morbidity of 1.40 ( 95 % CI 1.16 - 1.58 ) and 1.38 ( 95 % CI 1.12 - 1.70 ) , respectively . CONCLUSIONS The results of the present study demonstrate that ( a ) adding valsartan to prescribed therapy for HF significantly reduces the incidence of AF by 37 % ; ( b ) BNP level and advanced age were the strongest independent predictors for AF occurrence ; and ( c ) AF occurrence further worsens the outcome in patients with HF AIMS In the setting of congestive heart failure ( CHF ) , atrial fibrillation ( AF ) ablation can improve clinical status and the left ventricular ejection fraction ( LVEF ) value . However , the impact of AF ablation on the implantable cardioverter defibrillator ( ICD ) indication has never been specifically addressed . METHODS AND RESULTS Study subject were six CHF ( mean age 61.1 + /- 6.9 years , mean LVEF 25.8 + /- 7.3 % ) patients refractory to conventional medical treatment with long-lasting AF unresponsive to external cardioversion . Five patients had an idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy ( DCM ) and one had an ischaemic cardiomyopathy ( ICM ) . Their New York Heart Association ( NYHA ) class was III-IV . Two patients had renal insufficiency . No patient had left ventricular delay . All patients underwent AF ablation .  LVEF and NYHA class were dramatically improved in the five DCM patients . New York Heart Association class , but not the LVEF , was improved in the ICM patient . A redo ablative procedure was undertaken in four of five DCM patients and in the ICM patient due to arrhythmia recurrence . Left ventricular ejection fraction and NYHA were improved again in the DCM patients ( 56 + /- 4.4 % , I-II , respectively ) and led to ICD indication preclusion . The LVEF remained low in the ICM patient ( 30 % ) and led to ICD insertion . Sinus rhythm has been stable during the 18.1 + /- 5.7 months follow-up period . CONCLUSION  Atrial fibrillation ablation in CHF patients can improve both the clinical status of patients and their LVEF , especially among those affected by DCM . The LVEF improvement has the potential to preclude the indication for a primary prevention ICD insertion OBJECTIVE This study undertook to determine if the presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular dysfunction was associated with increased mortality and , if so , whether the increase could be attributed to progressive heart failure or arrhythmic death . BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation is a common condition in heart failure with the potential to impact hemodynamics and progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction as well as the electrophysiologic substrate for arrhythmias . The available data do not conclusively define the effect of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in heart failure . METHODS A retrospective analysis of the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention and Treatment Trials was conducted that compared patients with atrial fibrillation to those in sinus rhythm at baseline  for the risk of all-cause mortality , progressive pump-failure death and arrhythmic death . RESULTS The patients with atrial fibrillation at baseline , compared to those in sinus rhythm , had greater all-cause mortality ( 34 % vs. 23 % , p < 0.001 ) , death attributed to pump-failure ( 16.7 % vs. 9.4 % , p < 0.001 ) and were more likely to reach the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( 45 % vs. 33 % , p < 0.001 ) , but there was no significant difference between the groups in arrhythmic deaths . After multivariate analysis , atrial fibrillation remained significantly associated with all-cause mortality ( relative risk [ RR ] 1.34 , 95 % confidence interval [ CI ] 1.12 to 1.62 , p=0.002 ) , progressive pump-failure death ( RR 1.42 , 95 % CI 1.09 to 1.85 , p=0.01 ) , the composite end point of death or hospitalization for heart failure ( RR 1.26 , 95 % CI 1.03 to 1.42 , p=0.02 ) , but not arrhythmic death ( RR 1.13 ; 95 % CI 0.75 to 1.71 ; p=0.55 ) . CONCLUSIONS The presence of atrial fibrillation in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction is associated with an increased risk for all-cause mortality , largely explained by an increased risk for pump-failure death . These data suggest that atrial fibrillation is associated with progression of left ventricular systolic dysfunction OBJECTIVE Ibutilide is a type III antiarrhythmic agent approved for the pharmacologic conversion of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and atrial flutter ( AFl ) . Previous studies conducted outside the ED setting have demonstrated conversion rates of 60 % to 80 % . This response has been highest in patients with recent-onset AF-AFl . These observations and the 4-hour half-life of ibutilide suggest that it may be an excellent drug with which to treat AF-AFl in the ED . The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy and safety of ibutilide in terminating AF-AFl in patients who present to the ED with symptoms of less than 3 days ' duration , neither angina nor heart failure , and no comorbid conditions that require admission . METHODS Among 36 enrolled patients , the admission electrocardiogram demonstrated AF in 26 and AFl in 10 .  Ibutilide 1 mg was administered intravenously for 10 minutes . If sinus rhythm was not present 10 minutes after the infusion concluded , a second infusion of 1 mg was given . Successful conversion was defined as restoration of sinus rhythm within 1 hour after the last dose of ibutilide . RESULTS Sixteen ( 61.5 % ) of 26 patients with AF and 9 ( 90 % ) of 10 patients with AFl converted to sinus rhythm ( overall conversion rate=69 % ) . The mean time to arrhythmia termination was 19+/-9 minutes . The mean stay in the ED was 16.2 hours . No significant complications occurred . CONCLUSION We conclude that ibutilide is an excellent therapy option for restoring sinus rhythm in the ED . Its use may obviate the need for admission , avoid the risks and inconveniences of general anesthesia to perform electrical cardioversion , and reduce the ED length of stay in selected patients with recent-onset atrial arrhythmias Aims Uncertainty exists over the importance of device-detected short- duration atrial arrhythmias . Continuous atrial diagnostics , through home monitoring ( HM ) technology ( BIOTRONIK , Berlin , Germany ) , provides a unique opportunity to assess frequency and quantity of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) episodes defined as atrial high-rate events ( AHRE ) . Methods and results Prospect i ve data from 560 heart failure ( HF ) patients ( age 67 ± 10 years , median ejection fraction 27 % ) patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) device capable of HM from two multi-centre studies were analysed . Atrial high-rate events burden was defined as the duration of mode switch in a 24-h period with atrial rates of > 180 beats for at least 1 % or total of 14 min per day . The primary endpoint was incidence of a thromboembolic ( TE ) event . Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death , hospitalization because of AF , or worsening HF . Over a median 370-day follow-up AHRE occurred in 40 % of patients with 11 ( 2 % ) patients developing TE complications and mortality rate of 4.3 % ( 24 deaths , 16 with cardiovascular aetiology ) . Compared with patients without detected AHRE , patients with detected AHRE>3.8 h over a day were nine times more likely to develop TE complications ( P= 0.006 ) . The majority of patients ( 73 % ) did not show a temporal association with the detected atrial episode and their adverse event , with a mean interval of 46.7 ± 71.9 days ( range 0–194 ) before the TE complication . Conclusion In a high-risk cohort of HF patients , device-detected atrial arrhythmias are associated with an increased incidence of TE events . A cut-off point of 3.8 h over 24 h was associated with significant increase in the event rate . Routine assessment of AHRE should be considered with other data when assessing stroke risk and considering anti-coagulation initiation and should also prompt the optimization of cardioprotective HF therapy in CRT patients INTRODUCTION Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure ( HF ) and represents an important comorbidity in these patients . Cardiac resynchronization therapy ( CRT ) has been shown to be beneficial in patients with HF . Whether patients with AF benefit similarly from CRT as their counterparts in sinus rhythm is controversial . METHODS AND RESULTS We conducted a cohort analysis of 175 patients ( 138 men ; age range 57 - 79 years ) who underwent CRT implantation during 2004 - 2008 in our institution . AF was documented in 66 patients ( 37.7 % of patients , 52 men ) . There were no differences in 1- or 2-year mortality between patients with and without AF ( 13.6 % vs 11.79 % , P = 0.7 ; 25.8 % vs 16.9 % , P = 0.2 , respectively ) . There were no differences between the groups in the rate of complications after CRT implantation or in the rate of appropriate electrical shocks . In the subgroup of AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator ( CRT-D ) ( n = 32 , 48.5 % ) , the 1-year mortality was 3.1 % as compared to 23.5 % in AF patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker ( P = 0.03 ) . This difference was no longer evident after 2 years ( 25.0 % vs 26.5 % , P = 0.8 , respectively ) . Ten patients ( 15.2 % ) with AF underwent atrioventricular ( AV ) node ablation . The 2-year mortality of these patients was 10.0 % as compared to 28.6 % in AF patients who did not undergo AV-node ablation ( P = 0.4 ) . CONCLUSIONS In this study , no difference in mortality appears to exist between patients with or without AF and who undergo CRT implantation . Our findings of the beneficial effects of AV-node ablation and CRT-D in AF patients deserve further investigation BACKGROUND Electrical isolation of the pulmonary veins by catheter ablation is an emerging treatment modality for the treatment of atrial fibrillation ( AF ) and is increasingly used in patients with heart failure . METHODS The catheter ablation versus st and ard conventional treatment in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and atrial fibrillation trial ( CASTLE-AF ) is a r and omized evaluation of ablative treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular dysfunction . The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality or worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization using a time to first event analysis . Secondary endpoints are all-cause mortality , cardiovascular mortality , cerebrovascular accidents , worsening of heart failure requiring unplanned hospitalization , unplanned hospitalization due to cardiovascular reason , all-cause hospitalization , quality of life , number of therapies ( shock and antitachycardia pacing ) delivered by the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator ( ICD ) , time to first ICD therapy , number of device-detected ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation episodes , AF burden , AF free interval , left ventricular function , exercise tolerance , and percentage of right ventricular pacing . CASTLE-AF will r and omize 420 patients for a minimum of 3 years at 48 sites in the United States , Europe , Australia , and South America AIMS This ancillary analysis of the GISSI-HF data base aims at assessing the effect of rosuvastatin on the occurrence of  atrial fibrillation ( AF )  in patients with chronic heart failure ( HF ) who were not in AF at study entry . METHODS AND RESULTS GISSI-HF was a double-blind , placebo-controlled trial testing n-3 PUFA and rosuvastatin vs. corresponding placebos in patients with chronic HF .  Atrial fibrillation occurrence was defined as the presence of AF in the electrocardiogram ( ECG ) performed at each visit during the trial or AF as a cause of worsening HF or hospital admission or as an event during hospitalization . Among the 3690 patients ( 80.7 % ) without AF on their baseline ECG , 15.0 % developed AF during a median follow-up period of 3.7 years , 258 r and omized to rosuvastatin ( 13.9 % ) vs. 294 allocated to placebo ( 16.0 % ) . Although the difference was not significant at unadjusted analysis ( P = 0.097 ) and multivariable analysis adjusting for clinical variables ( P = 0.067 ) , it became significant after adjustment for clinical variables and laboratory examinations ( P = 0.039 ) , and for clinical variables , laboratory examinations , and background therapies ( P = 0.038 ) . CONCLUSION This study shows that there is some evidence of a beneficial effect of rosuvastatin in terms of reduction of AF occurrence in patients with HF . Larger population s are needed to provide a definite answer to the question . Clinical Trials.gov Identifier : NCT00336336
In patients with AF and HF , rate control compared with rhythm control showed inferior risk of hospitalisation
BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation ( AF ) is a common arrhythmia that can promote or worsen heart failure ( HF ) .
Our purpose was to compare the effects of rate and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure .