Onset and Early Behavioral Effects of Pharmacologically Different Antidepressants and Placebo in Depression Efficacy and safety of add on low-dose mirtazapine in depression Effect of a single dose of citalopram on amygdala response to emotional faces An index of 5-HT synthesis changes during early antidepressant treatment: α-[11C]methyl-l-tryptophan PET study A Review of Vilazodone, Serotonin, and Major Depressive Disorder Combination of inositol and serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression Placebo-controlled comparison of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors citalopram and sertraline Does pretreatment testing for serotonin transporter polymorphisms lead to earlier effects of drug treatment in patients with major depression? A decision-analytic model. Response to an open trial of a second SSRI in major depression. Comparison of desipramine and citalopram treatments for depression in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Faster Onset of Antidepressant Effects of Citalopram Compared With Sertraline in Drug-Naïve First-Episode Major Depressive Disorder in a Chinese Population: A 6-Week Double-Blind, Randomized Comparative Study Maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fetal growth, and risk of adverse birth outcomes. GENetic and clinical Predictors Of treatment response in Depression: the GenPod randomised trial protocol Polymorphism of the 5-HT transporter and response to antidepressants: randomised controlled trial. Clinical and Neurobiological Effects of Tianeptine and Paroxetine in Major Depression Comparison of moclobemide with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on sexual function in depressed adults Monoamines and the mechanism of antidepressant action: effects of catecholamine depletion on mood of patients treated with antidepressants. A randomised controlled trial to compare the cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine. Aripiprazole as an augmentor of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in depression and anxiety disorder patients Citalopram versus desipramine in treatment resistant depression: Effect of continuation or switching strategies. A randomized open study Cardiac side‐effects of two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in middle- aged and elderly depressed patients Treatment of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-resistant depression in adolescents: predictors and moderators of treatment response. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and lofepramine: randomised controlled trial. Effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Citalopram versus fluoxetine: a double‐blind, controlled, multicentre, phase III trial in patients with unipolar major depression treated in general practice Nine-month predictors and outcomes of SSRI antidepressant continuation in primary care. Shortened onset of action of antidepressants in major depression using acetylsalicylic acid augmentation: a pilot open-label study
This study was aim ed at resolving the time course of clinical action of antidepressants ( ADs ) and the type of early behavioral changes that precede recovery in treatment-responsive depressed patients . The first goal was to identify , during the first 2 weeks of treatment , the onset of clinical actions of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) , paroxetine , and the selective noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor , desipramine ( DMI ) . The second aim was to test the hypothesis that the two pharmacologic subtypes would induce different early behavioral changes in treatment-responsive patients . The design was a r and omized , parallel group , placebo-controlled , double-blind study for 6 weeks of treatment following a 1-week washout period . The study utilized measures of the major behavioral components of the depressive disorder as well as overall severity . The results indicated that the onset of clinical actions of DMI ranged from 3 to 13 days , averaged 13 days for paroxetine , and was 16–42 days for placebo . Furthermore , as hypothesized , the different types of ADs initially impacted different behavioral aspects of the disorder . After 1 week of treatment , DMI produced greater reductions in motor retardation and depressed mood than did paroxetine and placebo , and this difference persisted at the second week of treatment . Early improvement in depressed mood – motor retardation differentiated patients who responded to DMI after 6 weeks of treatment from those that did not . Paroxetine initially reduced anxiety more in responders than in nonresponders , and by the second week , significantly improved depressed mood and distressed expression in responders to a greater extent . Depressed patients who responded to placebo showed no consistent early pattern of behavior improvement . Early drug-specific behavioral changes were highly predictive of ultimate clinical response to the different ADs , results that could eventually be applied directly to clinical practice Objectives : Although antidepressant medications are effective , they have a delayed onset of effect . Mirtazapine , an atypical antidepressant is an important option for add-on therapy in major depression . There is insufficient data on mirtazapine in Indian population ; hence this study was design ed to study the add-on effect of low-dose mirtazapine with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) in major depressive disorder ( MDD ) in Indian population . Material s and Methods : In an open , r and omized study , 60 patients were divided into two groups . In Group A ( n=30 ) patients received conventional SSRIs for 6 weeks . In Group B ( n=30 ) patients received conventional SSRIs with low-dose mirtazapine for 6 weeks . Patients were evaluated at baseline and then at 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , and 6 weeks . Results : There was significant improvement in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HDRS ) , Montgomery and Asberg depression rating scale ( MADRS ) scores ( P<0.05 ) in both groups . Mirtazapine in low dose as add on therapy showed improvement in scores , had earlier onset of action , and more number of responders and remitters as compared to conventional treatment ( P<0.05 ) . No serious adverse event was reported in either of the groups . Conclusion : Low-dose mirtazapine as add-on therapy has shown better efficacy , earlier onset of action and more number of responders and remitters as compared to conventional treatment in MDD in Indian patients Background Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are typically thought to have a delay of several weeks in the onset of their clinical effects . However , recent reports suggest they may have a much earlier therapeutic onset . A reduction in amygdala responsivity has been implicated in the therapeutic action of SSRIs . Aims To investigate the effect of a single dose of an SSRI on the amygdala response to emotional faces . Method Twenty-six healthy volunteers were r and omised to receive a single oral dose of citalopram ( 20 mg ) or placebo . Effects on the processing of facial expressions were assessed 3 h later using functional magnetic resonance imaging . Results Volunteers treated with citalopram displayed a significantly reduced amygdala response to fearful facial expressions compared with placebo . Conclusions Such an immediate effect of an SSRI on amygdala responses to threat supports the idea that antidepressants have an earlier onset of therapeutically relevant effects than conventionally thought The antidepressant selective serotonin transporter inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are clinical ly active after a delay of several weeks . Indeed , the rapid increase of serotonin ( 5-HT ) caused by SSRIs , stimulates the 5-HT(1A ) autoreceptors , which exert a negative feedback on the 5-HT neurotransmission . Only when autoreceptors are desensitized , can SSRIs exert their therapeutic activity . The 5-HT(1A ) receptor antagonist pindolol has been used to accelerate the clinical effects of antidepressant by preventing the negative feedback . Using the alpha-[(11)C]methyl-L-tryptophan/positron emission tomography ( PET ) , the goal of the present double-blind , r and omized study was to compare the changes in alpha-[(11)C]methyl-L-tryptophan trapping , an index of serotonin synthesis , in patients suffering from unipolar depression treated with the SSRI citalopram ( 20 mg/day ) plus placebo versus patients treated with citalopram plus pindol ( 7.5 mg/day ) .  PET and Hamilton depression rating scale ( HDRS-17 ) were performed at baseline , and after 10 and 24 days of antidepressant treatment . Results show that the combination citalopram plus pindol , compared to citalopram alone shows a more rapid and greater increase of an index of 5-HT synthesis in prefrontal cortex ( BA 9 ) . This research is the first human PET study demonstrating that , after 24 days , the combination SSRIs plus pindolol produces a greater increase of the metabolism of serotonin in the prefrontal cortex , an area associated to depressive symptoms Objective : To review the mechanism of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)–mediated serotonergic neurotransmission , focusing on serotonin 1A ( 5-HT1A ) autoreceptors , which are proposed to be involved in delaying therapeutic efficacy . Vilazodone was specifically design ed to function both as an SSRI and a partial agonist at 5-HT1A receptors . This combined mechanism is proposed to decrease time to efficacy , minimize sexual side effects , and provide concomitant anxiolytic properties . Data Sources : A PubMed search of all English- language articles from January 1990 to January 2013 was conducted using the search terms depression and 5-HT1A , depression and buspirone , depression and pindolol , and vilazodone . Study Selection : We found 47 articles and abstract s that were selected for inclusion on the basis of information about the pharmacology of 5-HT1A receptors and the clinical data on pindolol , buspirone , and vilazodone in depression . Data Extraction : This review summarizes current literature involving antidepressant activity , the role of 5-HT1A autoreceptors , and clinical trials involving serotonin reuptake inhibition in conjunction with 5-HT1A agonists and partial agonists , with a focus on vilazodone . Results : Vilazodone has demonstrated efficacy in 2 large , r and omized , double-blind , placebo-controlled trials in major depressive disorder . Results suggest that vilazodone has a low incidence of sexual side effects and is effective in patients with high levels of anxiety . A pooled analysis shows evidence of significant symptom reduction after only 1 week of therapy . Conclusions : If future studies corroborate the clinical benefits attributed to its mechanism of action , vilazodone may show potential advantages in terms of onset of action , sexual side effects , and anxiolytic activity in patients with major depressive disorder BACKGROUND Inositol has been reported to be an effective treatment in depression , and we hypothesized that inositol addition might enhance or speed up response to  serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) . METHODS Twenty-seven depressed patients completed a double-blind controlled 4-week trial of SSRI plus placebo or SSRI plus inositol .  Hamilton Depression Rating Scale was used as an assessment tool at baseline , and 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 weeks . RESULTS No significant difference was found between the two treatment groups . CONCLUSIONS Previous studies combining different effective antidepressant therapies similarly found no evidence for additive effects [ e.g. , monoamine oxidase inhibitors ( MAOI ) plus tricyclic antidepressants ( TCA ) , TCA plus lithium ] . By contrast , augmentation by lithium or MAOI after a failed course of antidepressant treatment is effective and should be studied with inositol BACKGROUND Previous comparative studies of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) have rarely included a placebo control group and have rarely demonstrated significant between-group differences . The study reported on here was a placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant effects of two SSRIs , citalopram and sertraline . METHODS Three hundred twenty-three patients with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder were r and omized to 24 weeks of double-blind treatment with citalopram ( 20 - 60 mg/day ) , sertraline ( 50 - 150 mg/day ) , or a placebo . The primary efficacy measure was the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HAMD ) and the primary statistical analysis was an analysis of variance comparing the change from baseline to the last observation carried forward in each treatment group . RESULTS Both citalopram and sertraline produced significantly greater improvement than placebo on the HAMD , the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale , and the Clinical Global Impression Scale . Significant improvement was observed at earlier timepoints in the citalopram group than the sertraline group ; however , sertraline treatment was associated with increased gastrointestinal side effects and a tendency toward early discontinuation , and analyses that excluded early dropouts revealed similar acute efficacy for the two active treatments . The Hamilton Anxiety Scale demonstrated a significant anxiolytic effect of citalopram , but not sertraline , relative to placebo . CONCLUSIONS This study confirms the antidepressant efficacy of two SSRIs , citalopram and sertraline . It is hypothesized that the more consistent evidence of antidepressant activity that was observed early in treatment in the citalopram group was related to more pronounced antianxiety effects and better tolerability upon initiation of therapy BACKGROUND An estimated 30 % to 40 % of patients with depression do not sufficiently respond to treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) and the period in which treatment efficacy can be assessed is relatively long . Therefore , a test to identify potential nonresponders could be useful in the treatment of depression . Serotonin transporter gene ( SLC6A4 ) variations have been reported to account for differences in the way individuals respond to SSRI treatment . OBJECTIVE A decision-analytic model was used to assess whether pretreatment genetic testing for 5-HTTLPR , a polymorphism of the SLC6A4 genotype , could be an efficient tool in the treatment of depression . METHODS A theoretical clinical decision-analytic model was constructed to compare the current treatment strategy in The Netherl and s with an alternative strategy for the treatment of depression . Under treatment guidelines in The Netherl and s , all patients with depression receive SSRI treatment ( nontesting strategy ) . Under the alternative strategy , genetic testing would be performed to identify which class of antidepressant would be the best choice for initiation of treatment ( genetic testing strategy ) . Probabilities ( predicted results ) for this model were based on data from previous studies and the opinions of experts in the field of psychopharmacology . To test the robustness of the model , 6- and 12-week remission rates for patients treated with SSRIs were varied in a sensitivity analysis using a predetermined range that was established based on expert opinion . Threshold analyses were performed on the parameters of serotonin transporter genotype frequency and response and nonresponse rates for patients receiving SSRIs , serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors ( SNRIs ) , and tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) to determine the value for a variable at which it could be concluded that a change in treatment strategy would be preferred . RESULTS When genetic testing was performed before an antidepressant was prescribed , 64.6 % of patients were predicted to be in remission after 6 weeks of treatment compared with 60.0 % of patients who did not receive genetic testing . After 12 weeks , 79.5 % of patients in the testing group who received an SNRI as initial treatment and 83.2 % of those who received a TCA initially were predicted to be in remission compared with 76.7 % of patients in the nontesting group . Sensitivity analyses indicated that the model was robust to variation of probability estimates within their plausible ranges . However , these findings were based on a theoretic model and did not include cost assessment . Pretreatment genetic testing must be evaluated further in r and omized clinical trials and costs must be assessed before implementing this strategy in routine psychiatric practice can be recommended . CONCLUSIONS The findings of this study suggest that performing genetic testing before prescribing antidepressant treatment may lead to greater numbers of patients experiencing remission early in treatment BACKGROUND We evaluated the efficacy of a second serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) in patients who had failed to respond to the first SSRI used . METHOD Fifty-five patients with major depression who had failed one of the SSRIs for their current depressive episode were included . After failing a trial of one SSRI , they received a second SSRI in an open clinical trial . RESULTS On the basis of the Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale , 28 of 55 patients had a marked or complete antidepressant response . CONCLUSION These data provide preliminary clinical evidence that substituting a second SRI may be a useful clinical alternative in depressed patients who fail to respond to an adequate trial of an SSRI Depression is one of the most common psychiatric disturbances in Parkinson 's disease ( PD ) . Recent review s have highlighted the lack of controlled trials and the ensuing difficulty in formulating recommendations for antidepressant use in PD . We sought to establish whether antidepressants provide real benefits and whether tricyclic and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) antidepressants differ in their short-term efficacy , because the time to onset of therapeutic benefit remains an important criterion in depression . The short-term efficacy ( after 14 and 30 days ) of two antidepressants ( desipramine , a predominantly noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor tricyclic and citalopram , a SSRI ) was assessed in a double-blind , r and omized , placebo- controlled study of 48 nondemented PD patients suffering from major depression . After 14 days , desipramine prompted an improvement in the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale ( MADRS ) score , compared with citalopram and placebo . Both antidepressants produced significant improvements in the MADRS score after 30 days . Mild adverse events were twice as frequent in the desipramine group as in the other groups . A predominantly noradrenergic tricyclic antidepressant induced a more intense short-term effect on parkinsonian depression than did an SSRI . However , desipramine 's lower tolerability may outweigh its slight short-term clinical advantage Several previous studies , including a meta- analysis , reported no significant differences between various selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) in the treatment of major depressive disorder . However , because of the different chemical structure of SSRIs and the difference in the frequency of serotonin transporter polymorphisms between ethnic groups , a head-to-head comparative study between SSRIs in different population s may be enlightening . We compared the efficacy and adverse effect profiles of citalopram and sertraline in a double-blinded r and omized clinical trial in a Chinese population of drug-naïve patients with first-episode major depressive disorder . Fifty-one patients were r and omly assigned to citalopram or sertraline treatment . The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ( MADRS ) was used as the primary outcome . Efficacy and adverse effects were analyzed in an intent-to-treat population . Efficacy was analyzed using a last-observation-carried-forward method for early terminators . There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics at baseline . No significant differences were found in MADRS scores between citalopram and sertraline at baseline ( 36.6 ± 5.5 vs 38.2 ± 4.9 ; P = 0.322 ) or at the end of treatment ( week 6 ; 10.8 ± 10.0 vs 16.7 ± 11.3 ; P = 0.082 ) . However , MADRS scores in the citalopram group were significantly lower at week 1 ( 25.2 ± 8.5 vs 30.4 ± 6.1 ; P = 0.029 ) and week 3 ( 15.9 ± 10.0 vs 22.1 ± 8.7 ; P = 0.037 ) . Overall , treatment-emergent adverse effects were reported by 14.3 % and 28.6 % of patients in the citalopram and sertraline groups , respectively . In conclusion ,  citalopram  and sertraline were both efficacious and well tolerated . However , citalopram exhibited a significantly faster onset than sertraline during the early weeks of treatment and tended to have a better efficacy in overall treatment , although the statistic was not significant CONTEXT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are frequently prescribed to pregnant women , but knowledge about their unintended effects on child health is scarce . OBJECTIVE To examine the effects of maternal SSRI use during pregnancy on fetal growth and birth outcomes . DESIGN The study was embedded in the Generation R Study , a prospect i ve population -based study from fetal life onward . PARTICIPANTS Seven thous and six hundred ninety-six pregnant women were included .  Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use was assessed by question naires in each trimester and verified by pharmacy records . Using depressive symptom scores from the Brief Symptom Inventory , 7027 pregnant mothers ( 91.3 % ) had no or low depressive symptoms , 570 pregnant mothers ( 7.4 % ) had clinical ly relevant depressive symptoms and used no SSRIs , and 99 pregnant mothers ( 1.3 % ) used SSRIs .  MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Fetal ultrasonography was performed in each trimester . We determined fetal body and head growth with repeated assessment s of body and head size . The birth outcomes studied were preterm birth , small for gestational age , and low birth weight . RESULTS Fetuses from mothers with prenatal depressive symptoms showed reduced body growth ( β=-4.4 g/wk ; 95 % CI : -6.3 to -2.4 ; P<.001 ) and head growth ( β=-0.08 mm/wk ; 95 % CI : -0.14 to -0.03 ; P=.003 ) . Mothers using SSRIs during pregnancy had fewer depressive symptoms than mothers in the clinical symptom range . Prenatal SSRI use was not associated with reduced body growth but was associated with reduced fetal head growth ( β=-0.18 mm/wk ; 95 % CI : -0.32 to -0.07 ; P=.003 ) . The SSRI-exposed children were at higher risk for preterm birth ( odds ratio=2.14 ; 95 % CI : 1.08 to 4.25 ; P=.03 ) . CONCLUSIONS Untreated maternal depression was associated with slower rates of fetal body and head growth . Pregnant mothers treated with SSRIs had fewer depressive symptoms and their fetuses had no delay in body growth but had delayed head growth and were at increased risk for preterm birth . Further research on the implication s of these findings is needed Background The most effective pharmacological treatments for depression inhibit the transporters that reuptake serotonin ( Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors – SSRIs ) and noradrenaline ( Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors – NaRIs ) into the presynaptic terminal . There is evidence to suggest that noradrenaline and serotonin enhancing drugs work through separate mechanisms to produce their clinical antidepressant action . Although most of the current evidence suggests there is little difference in overall efficacy between SSRIs and NaRIs , there are patients who respond to one class of compounds and not another . This suggests that treatment response could be predicted by genetic and /or clinical characteristics . Firstly , this study aims to investigate the influence of a polymorphism ( SLC6A4 ) in the 5HT transporter in altering response to SSRI medication . Secondly , the study will investigate whether those with more severe depression have a better response to NaRIs than SSRIs . Methods / design The GenPod trial is a multi-centre r and omised controlled trial . GPs referred patients aged between 18–74 years presenting with a new episode of depression , who did not have any medical contraindications to antidepressant medication and who had no history of psychosis or alcohol/substance abuse . Patients were interviewed to ascertain their suitability for the study . Eligible participants ( with a primary diagnosis of depression according to ICD10 criteria and a Beck Depression Inventory ( BDI ) score > 14 ) were r and omised to receive one of two antidepressant treatments , either the SSRI Citalopram or the NaRI Reboxetine , stratified according to severity . The final number r and omised to the trial was 601 . Follow-up assessment s took place at 2 , 6 and 12 weeks following r and omisation . Primary outcome was measured at 6 weeks by the BDI . Outcomes will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis and will use multiple regression models to compare treatments . Discussion The results of the trial will provide information about targeting antidepressant treatment for individual patients ; in turn this may increase prescribing efficacy , thereby speeding recovery and reducing the cost to the NHS . It will also help to underst and the different roles that noradrenaline and serotonin might play in the biology of depression . The trial is expected to report in the autumn of 2008.Trial Registration IS RCT N BACKGROUND Antidepressants exhibit a variety of pharmacological actions including inhibition of the serotonin and noradrenaline transporters . We wished to investigate whether genetic variation could be used to target or personalise treatment , in a comparison of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) with noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors ( NARIs ) . AIMS To test the hypothesis that patients homozygous for the long ( insertion ) polymorphism of the serotonin transporter ( 5-HTTLPR ) have an increased response to SSRI antidepressants but not to NARI antidepressants . METHOD In an individually r and omised , parallel-group controlled trial , people meeting criteria for a depressive episode who were referred by their general practitioner were r and omised to receive either citalopram ( an SSRI ) or reboxetine ( an NARI ) . R and omisation was by means of a remote automated system accessed by telephone . The main outcome was depressive symptoms , measured by Beck Depression Inventory ( BDI ) total score 6 weeks after r and omisation . The trial was registered with the International St and ard R and omised Controlled Trials Number registry ( IS RCT N31345163 ) . RESULTS Altogether 298 participants were r and omised to receive citalopram and 303 were r and omised to reboxetine . At 6 weeks follow-up , complete data were available for 258 participants taking citalopram and 262 taking reboxetine . We found no evidence to support an influence of 5-HTTLPR on outcome following antidepressant treatment . The interaction term for BDI score at 6 weeks was 0.50 ( 95 % CI -2.04 to 3.03 , P = 0.70 ) , which indicated that responses to the SSRI and NARI were similar irrespective of 5-HTTLPR genotype . CONCLUSIONS It is unlikely that the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism alone will be clinical ly useful in predicting response to antidepressants in people with depression Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are widely used as effective pharmacological agents to treat depressive disorders . In contrast to the SSRIs , which block the presynaptic serotonin ( 5-HT ) transporter and by this route increase the concentration of serotonin in the synaptic cleft , the antidepressant tianeptine enhances the presynaptic neuronal reuptake of 5-HT and thus decreases serotonergic neurotransmission . Both SSRIs and tianeptine are clinical ly effective ; however , their opposite modes of action challenge the prevailing concepts on the need of enhancement of serotonergic neurotransmission . To better underst and the differences between these two opposite pharmacological modes of action , we compared the changes induced by tianeptine and paroxetine on psychopathology , the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical ( HPA ) system , and cognitive functions in a double-blind , r and omized , controlled trial including 44 depressed in patients over a period of 42 days .  Depressive symptomatology significantly improved in all efficacy measures , with no significant differences between tianeptine and paroxetine . There was a trend toward better response to the SSRI among women . Assessment of the HPA system showed marked hyperactivity before the beginning of treatment , which then normalized in most of the patients , without significant differences between the two antidepressants . Cognitive assessment s showed no significant differences between the two drugs investigated . The results of the current study suggest that the initial effect , i.e. , enhancement or decrease of 5-HT release , is only indirectly responsible for antidepressant efficacy , and they support the notion that downstream adaptations within and between nerve cells are crucial . The normalization of the HPA system as a common mode of action of different antidepressants seems to be of special interest OBJECTIVE To compare the emergent sexual effects of moclobemide and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) during acute and maintenance therapy in routine practice . METHOD 268 patients were evaluated for sexual function  at baseline , 6 weeks , 3 and 6 months of treatment using physician ratings and self-rating question naires . Patients received moclobemide , an reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor ( RIMA ) , or a SSRI ( fluoxetine , fluvoxamine , paroxetine , sertraline ) . RESULTS Baseline values were similar in all groups . Incidences of impairments of sexual functioning with treatment , whether clinical ly relevant or not , were 24.3 % with moclobemide and 61.5 % with SSRIs ( physician ratings ) , with no significant tolerance to these effects . There was a suggestion of differences between the SSRIs in their specific dysfunctions they cause . SSRIs ( 21.6 % of patients ) had about ten times the moclobemide rate ( 1.9 % ) of sexual dysfunction reported as adverse events . Antidepressant efficacy was comparable between treatments . CONCLUSION In patients for whom sexual function  is important or sexual dysfunction  is present , moclobemide should be considered a first line antidepressant Brain catecholamines can be rapidly reduced by inhibiting their synthesis with alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine ( AMPT ) . In order to assess the role of catecholamines in antidepressant action  AMPT challenges were administered in a double-blind , placebo-controlled , crossover fashion to 14 depressed patients having maintained a therapeutic antidepressant response for > or = 2 weeks ( 3 desipramine , 2 mazindol , 5 fluoxetine , 4 sertraline ) . Each patient participated in two challenges one week apart . Each challenge included a baseline , two days of either AMPT or diphenhydramine ( active placebo ) , and a followup . Antidepressant drugs were continued throughout testing . The 3 desipramine- and 2 mazindol-responders had a rapid increase in depression score during AMPT but not placebo ( diphenhydramine ) challenge whereas only 1 of 9 selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-treated patients did . The implication of this is that the antidepressant response to desipramine may be more acutely dependent on brain catecholamine content than the response to SSRIs . In the context of our previous work with tryptophan depletion , these results suggest that the neurobiological mechanisms underlying the antidepressant responses to different drugs involve alterations in the functioning of different neurotransmitter systems and reinforce the importance of changes in both the serotonin and catecholamine systems for successful antidepressant responses OBJECTIVE To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of three classes of antidepressants : tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) , selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , and the modified TCA lofepramine , as first choice treatments for depression in primary care . DESIGN Open , pragmatic , controlled trial with three r and omised arms and one preference arm . Patients were followed up for 12 months . SETTING UK primary care : 73 practice s in urban and rural areas in Engl and . PARTICIPANTS Patients with a new episode of depressive illness according to GP diagnosis . INTERVENTIONS Patients were r and omised to receive a TCA ( amitriptyline , dothiepin or imipramine ) , an SSRI ( fluoxetine , sertraline or paroxetine ) or lofepramine . Patients or GPs were able to choose an alternative treatment if preferred . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES At baseline the Clinical Interview Schedule , Revised ( CIS-R PROQSY computerised version ) was administered to establish symptom profiles . Outcome measures over the 12-month follow-up included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale self-rating of depression ( HAD-D ) , CIS-R , EuroQol ( EQ-5D ) for quality of life , Short Form ( SF-36 ) for generic health status , and patient and practice records of use of health and social services . The primary effectiveness outcome was the number of depression-free weeks ( HAD-D less than 8 , with interpolation of intervening values ) and the primary cost outcome total direct NHS costs . Quality -adjusted life-years ( QALYs ) were used as the outcome measure in a secondary analysis . Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves were computed . Estimates were bootstrapped with 5000 replications . RESULTS In total , 327 patients were r and omised . Follow-up rates were 68 % at 3 months and 52 % at 1 year . Linear regression analysis revealed no significant differences between groups in number of depression-free weeks when adjusted for baseline HAD-D. A higher proportion of patients r and omised to TCAs entered the preference arm than those allocated to the other choices . Switching to another class of antidepressant in the first few weeks of treatment occurred significantly more often in the lofepramine arm and less in the preference arm . There were no significant differences between arms in mean cost per depression-free week . For values placed on an additional QALY of over 5000 pounds , treatment with SSRIs was likely to be the most cost-effective strategy .  TCAs were the least likely to be cost-effective as first choice of antidepressant for most values of a depression-free week or QALY respectively , but these differences were relatively modest . CONCLUSIONS When comparing the different treatment options , no significant differences were found in outcomes or costs within the sample , but when outcomes and costs were analysed together , the result ing cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested that SSRIs were likely to be the most cost-effective option , although the probability of this did not rise above 0.6 . Choosing lofepramine is likely to lead to a greater proportion of patients switching treatment in the first few weeks . Further research is still needed on the management of depressive illness in primary care . This should address areas such as the optimum severity threshold at which medication should be used ; the feasibility and effectiveness of adopting structured depression management programmes in the UK context ; the importance of factors such as physical co-morbidity and recent life events in GPs ' prescribing decisions ; alternative ways of collecting data ; and the factors that give rise to many patients being reluctant to accept medication and discontinue treatment early More than half of anxiety and depression patients treated with an adequate course of antidepressants fail to fully improve . We retrospectively examined whether treatment-resistant depression and anxiety disorder patients responded to and tolerated augmentation with the atypical antipsychotic , aripiprazole . We report on patients with depression and anxiety disorders , including panic disorder , generalized anxiety disorder , social anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder , who had an incomplete response to a variety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) and who received augmentation with aripiprazole .  The primary outcome measure was the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement ( CGI-I ) . In the intent-to-treat analysis , the mean±SD CGI-S was 3.8±1.3 at endpoint . Fifty-nine percent of subjects received CGI-I ratings of 1 or 2 , ‘ much improved ’ or ‘ very much improved , ’ in terms of their depression and anxiety symptoms at the end of 12 weeks . Several patients showed an early ( weeks 1–5 ) , as well as sustained , response to augmentation with doses of aripiprazole between 15 and 30 mg/day . The results suggest that aripiprazole may be effective as an augmentation for patients with persistent depressive and anxiety disorders despite initial SSRI treatment . Because this is a retrospective case review , further prospect i ve studies are required to confirm these findings Abstract Objectives . Evidence in favour of switching between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI ) and tricyclic ( TCA ) antidepressants in treatment resistant depression has been tested in a few studies only , consequently a prospect i ve study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of switching strategies . Methods . One hundred eighty-nine patients who failed to respond to a previous antidepressant were r and omised to four arms : firstly they received citalopram or desipramine for a 4-week period ; secondly , those who failed to respond were treated for a further 4-week period with the same antidepressant ( citalopram-citalopram and desipramine-desipramine arms ) or switched to the alternate one ( citalopram-desipramine and desipramine-citalopram arms ) . Results . There was no difference in the first 4-week phase between patients receiving citalopram versus desipramine in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression ( HRSD ) , Montgomery – Asberg Depression Rating Scale ( MADRS ) , and Clinical Global Impression ( CGI ) scores . In the second 4-week phase remitter rates were higher among non-switched patients ( P = 0.04 ) . Moreover , considering HRSD and MADRS , switched patients reported significantly higher scores ( P ≤ 0.02 for both scales at each time-point ) . Conclusions . This study supports the thesis that switching from an SSRI to a TCA ( and vice versa ) in non-responders to a 4-week trial of an SSRI/TCA is not associated with improved response . The result goes in the opposite direction to that predicted by current guidelines Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are the ‘ new ’ drugs of first choice for the treatment of depression in the older patient . Systematic studies on the effects of SSRIs on cardiac function are scarce , despite the high prevalence of cardiac disorders in the older depressed patient . This is a study which systematic ally assesed cardiac function by echo-cardiography in middle-aged and elderly depressed patients treated with SSRI . In a double-blind r and omized trial , 20 patients were assigned to receive fluvoxamine 20 mg/day or fluoxetine 100mg/day for 6 weeks . Cardiac function was assessed by left ventricle ejection fraction , aortic flow integral and early or passive/late or active mitral inflow , and electrocardiography . Neither SSRI significantly affected cardiac function . Compared with patients without a history of myocardial infa rct ion and /or hypertension , patients with such a history showed a significant improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction . Despite our small study sample , these data indicate that both fluoxetine and fluvoxamine do not affect cardiac function adversely OBJECTIVE To advance knowledge regarding strategies for treating selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI)-resistant depression in adolescents , we conducted a r and omized controlled trial evaluating alternative treatment strategies . In primary analyses , cognitive-behavioral therapy ( CBT ) combined with medication change was associated with higher rates of positive response to short-term ( 12-week ) treatment than medication alone . This study examines predictors and moderators of treatment response , with the goal of informing efforts to match youths to optimal treatment strategies . METHOD Youths who had not improved during an adequate SSRI trial ( N = 334 ) were r and omized to an alternative SSRI , an alternative SSRI plus CBT , venlafaxine , or venlafaxine plus CBT . Analyses examined predictors and moderators of treatment response . RESULTS Less severe depression , less family conflict , and absence of nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior predicted better treatment response status . Significant moderators of response to CBT + medication ( combined ) treatment were number of comorbid disorders and abuse history ; hopelessness was marginally significant . The CBT/combined treatment superiority over medication alone was more evident among youths who had more comorbid disorders ( particularly attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and anxiety disorders ) , no abuse history , and lower hopelessness . Further analyses revealed a stronger effect of combined CBT + medication treatment among youths who were older and white and had no nonsuicidal self-injurious behavior and longer pre study pharmacotherapy . CONCLUSIONS Combined treatment with CBT and antidepressant medication may be more advantageous for adolescents whose depression is comorbid with other disorders . Given the additional costs of adding CBT to medication , consideration of moderators in clinical decision making can contribute to a more personalized and effective approach to treatment BACKGROUND The cost-effectiveness of tricyclic antidepressants ( TCAs ) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) has not been compared in a prospect i ve study in primary care . AIMS To determine the relative cost-effectiveness of TCAs , SSRIs and lofepramine in UK primary care . METHOD An open-label , three-arm r and omised trial with a preference arm . Practitioners referred 327 patients with incident depression . RESULTS No significant differences were found in effectiveness or cost-effectiveness . The numbers of depression-free weeks over 12 months ( on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ) were 25.3 ( 95 % CI 21.3 - 29.0 ) for TCAs , 28.3 ( 95 % CI 24.3 - 32.2 ) for SSRIs and 24.6 ( 95 % CI 20.6 - 28.9 ) for lofepramine .  Mean health service costs per patient were pound 762 ( 95 % CI 553 - 1059 ) for TCAs , pound 875 ( 95 % CI 675 - 1355 ) for SSRIs and pound 867 ( 95 % CI 634 - 1521 ) for lofepramine .  Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves suggested SSRIs were most cost-effective ( with a probability of up to 0.6 ) . CONCLUSIONS The findings support a policy of recommending SSRIs as first-choice antidepressants in primary care To evaluate the possible influence of buspirone on sexual dysfunction in depressed patients treated with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor ( SSRI )  , we analyzed data from a placebo-controlled trial design ed to explore the efficacy of buspirone as add-on treatment for patients not responding to an SSRI alone . At baseline , all patients met the criteria for a major depressive episode according to DSM-IV and had received citalopram or paroxetine during a minimum of 4 weeks without responding to the treatment .  Buspirone ( flexible dosage , 20 - 60 mg/day ) or placebo was added to the SSRI for 4 weeks ; the mean daily dose of buspirone at endpoint was 48.5 mg ( SD = 1.0 ) . Sexual dysfunction was evaluated using a structured interview . Before starting medication with buspirone or placebo , 40 % ( 47 of 117 ) reported at least one kind of sexual dysfunction ( decreased libido , ejaculatory dysfunction , orgasmic dysfunction ) . During the 4 weeks of treatment , approximately 58 % of subjects treated with buspirone reported an improvement with respect to sexual function ; in the placebo group , the response rate was 30 % . The difference between placebo and active drug treatment was more pronounced in women than in men . The response was obvious during the first week , with no further improvement during the course of the study . It is suggested that the effect of buspirone on sexual dysfunction is a result of a reversal of SSRI-induced sexual side effects rather than of an antidepressant effect of the drug & NA ; Two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) , citalopram and fluoxetine , both at a daily dose of 20 mg , were compared in patients with unipolar major depression treated in general practice . This was a multicentre , double‐blind , r and omized trial carried out in France . The duration of treatment was 8 weeks . Patients were assessed by means of the Montgomery‐Åsberg Depression Rating Scale ( MADRS ) , the 17 items Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ( HAMD ) and the investigator 's Clinical Global Impressions ( CGI ) . Observed and spontaneously reported adverse events were also recorded . A total of 357 patients of both sexes , aged between 21 and 73 years , entered the double‐blind phase of the trial . A clear reduction of both the MADRS and the HAMD mean total scores was observed in both treatment groups with no statistically significant differences between treatments . Apart from back pain recorded more frequently in the citalopram group , no significant difference was found between the two treatment groups with regard to adverse events , and both citalopram and fluoxetine were considered to be well tolerated . It was concluded that citalopram was as effective as fluoxetine in the treatment of unipolar major depression . Citalopram showed an earlier onset of recovery than fluoxetine BACKGROUND This study aim ed to identify the predictors and outcomes of SSRI antidepressant continuation , discontinuation and switching over a 9-month period of naturalistic observation . METHODS Primary care patients ( n=573 ) with physician-diagnosed depression from 37 practice s were r and omized to an open-label trial of one of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) managed in their primary care setting .  Psychiatric characteristics and treatment course were assessed at baseline and at 1 , 3 , 6 and 9 months after medication initiation . RESULTS Nineteen percent of patients switched SSRIs , which occurred significantly sooner than discontinuation ( median : 41 vs.100 days ) . Time to discontinuation was primarily explained by baseline patient skepticism about taking an antidepressant ( 62 % increase in discontinuation risk ) . In contrast , time to switch was associated with greater impairment at baseline and lesser improvement in impairment during the first month on medication . Patients who discontinued were significantly less likely to be depressed 9 months after starting medication than those who either continued or switched medication , and were less symptomatic and impaired than patients who switched . CONCLUSIONS Baseline impairment may increase the risk for SSRI antidepressant switching . Additionally , patient skepticism about antidepressants predicts early SSRI discontinuation and may predict rapid recovery . Intent-to-treat analyses in nonr and omized clinical trials may paradoxically inflate antidepressant effect sizes Based on our pre clinical data showing a potential accelerating effect of acetylsalicylic acid ( ASA ) in combination with fluoxetine in an animal model of depression , we examined the effect of ASA augmentation therapy on selective reuptake inhibitors ( SSRI ) in major depressed non-responder patients . Twenty-four non-responder patients having received at least 4 weeks of an adequate SSRI treatment were included in a pilot open-label study . Participants were treated openly during 4 weeks with 160 mg/day ASA in addition to their current antidepressant treatment . The combination SSRI – ASA was associated with a response rate of 52.4 % . Remission was achieved in 43 % of the total sample and 82 % of the responder sample . In the responder group , a significant improvement was observed within week 1 ( mean Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-21 items at day 0=29.3±4.5 , at day 7=14.0±4.1 ; P<0.0001 ) and remained sustained until day 28 . Despite limitations due to the open nature of this study , our preliminary results confirm our pre clinical findings and are in favour of an accelerating effect  of ASA in combination with SSRIs in the treatment of major depression . Potential physiological and biochemical mechanisms may involve an anti-inflammatory and /or neurotrophic effect
Treatment with SSRIs rather than placebo was associated with clinical improvement by the end of the first week of use .
CONCLUSIONS Treatment with SSRIs is associated with symptomatic improvement in depression by the end of the first week of use , and the improvement continues at a decreasing rate for at least 6 weeks
CONTEXT Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors ( SSRIs ) are often described as having a delayed onset of effect in the treatment of depression .
However , some trials have reported clinical improvement as early as the first week of treatment .
OBJECTIVE To test the alternative hypotheses of delayed vs early onset of antidepressant action with SSRIs in patients with unipolar depression .