Are Work Disability Prevention Interventions Effective for the Management of Neck Pain or Upper Extremity Disorders? A Systematic Review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review The burden and determinants of neck pain in workers: results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000-2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Scoping review of systematic reviews of complementary medicine for musculoskeletal and mental health conditions Evidence-based medicine and the challenge of low back pain: where are we now? Physical rehabilitation interventions for adult patients with critical illness across the continuum of recovery: an overview of systematic reviews protocol Efficacy of postural and neck-stabilization exercises for persons with acute whiplash-associated disorders: a systematic review. Interventions to reduce the incidence of falls in older adult patients in acute care hospitals: a systematic review Applicability and Clinical Relevance of Results in Randomized Controlled Trials: The Cochrane Review on Exercise Therapy for Low Back Pain as an Example Digital Education in Health Professions: The Need for Overarching Evidence Synthesis Assessing the evidence for the use of chiropractic manipulation in paediatric health conditions: A systematic review. The effectiveness of group medical visits on diabetes mellitus type 2 (dm2) specific outcomes in adults: a systematic review The journal club in postgraduate medical education: a systematic review Diagnostic utility of facet (zygapophysial) joint injections in chronic spinal pain: a systematic review of evidence. Development and evaluation of an instrument for the critical appraisal of randomized controlled trials of natural products The effectiveness of exercise on recovery and clinical outcomes of soft tissue injuries of the leg, ankle, and foot: A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Effectiveness of instruction in critical appraisal (evidence-based medicine) skills: a critical appraisal. Are non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders, whiplash-associated disorders, or non-specific low back pain? A systematic review of systematic reviews by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration The development of CHAMP: a checklist for the appraisal of moderators and predictors Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables A critical synthesis of literature on the promoting action on research implementation in health services (PARIHS) framework How to write an evidence-based clinical review article. Systematic review automation technologies Effects of music listening on adult patients' pre-procedural state anxiety in hospital. Exercise in the treatment of rotator cuff impingement: a systematic review and a synthesized evidence-based rehabilitation protocol. A controlled trial of a seminar to improve medical student attitudes toward, knowledge about, and use of the medical literature Medial branch neurotomy in management of chronic spinal pain: systematic review of the evidence. Critical Appraisal Turkey Shoot: Linking Critical Appraisal to Clinical Decision Making Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted? Teaching critical appraisal during critical care fellowship training: A foundation for evidence-based critical care medicine Chemotherapy for head and neck cancer. The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise on Female Sexual Function During Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Systematic Review. Effects of music listening on adult patients' pre‐procedural state anxiety in hospital The natural course of low back pain: a systematic critical literature review Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology Preventing food allergy: protocol for a rapid systematic review How do systematic reviews incorporate risk of bias assessments into the synthesis of evidence? A methodological study Chiropractic care for patients with asthma: A systematic review of the literature. Selecting and Appraising Studies for a Systematic Review The effectiveness of self‐management educational interventions for osteoarthritis of the knee Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies. Systematic reviews in endodontics--examples of GIGO? Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colonic Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain in Adults Treated by Manual Therapy: A Systematic Review of Change Scores in Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Session [Psychological mechanisms in the transition from acute to chronic pain: over- or underrated?].
Abstract Purpose We conducted a systematic review to critically appraise and synthesize literature on the effectiveness of work disability prevention ( WDP ) interventions in workers with neck pain , whiplash-associated disorders ( WAD ) , or upper extremity disorders . Methods We search ed electronic data bases from 1990 to 2012 . R and om pairs of independent review ers critically appraised eligible studies using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria . Scientifically admissible studies were summarized and synthesized following best- evidence synthesis methodology . Results Of the 6,359 articles retrieved , 16 r and omized controlled trials were eligible for critical appraisal and five were admissible . We found that a return-to-work coordination program ( including workplace-based work hardening ) was superior to clinic-based work hardening for persistent rotator cuff tendinitis . Workplace high-intensity strength training and workplace advice had similar outcomes for neck and shoulder pain . Mensendieck/Cesar postural exercises and strength and fitness exercises had similar outcomes for non-specific work-related upper limb complaints . Adding a brief job stress education program to a workplace ergonomic intervention was not beneficial for persistent upper extremity symptoms . Adding computer-prompted work breaks to ergonomic adjustments and workplace education benefited workers ’ recovery from recent work-related neck and upper extremity complaints . Conclusions At present , no firm conclusions can be drawn regarding the effectiveness of WDP interventions for managing neck pain , WAD , and upper extremity disorders . Our review suggests a return-to-work coordination program is more effective than clinic-based work hardening . Also , adding computer-prompted breaks to ergonomic and workplace interventions benefits workers ’ recovery . The current quality of evidence does not allow for a definitive evaluation of the effectiveness of ergonomic interventions Background Neck pain is a common problem and different forms of manual therapy are used in its treatment . The purpose of this systematic review was to critically appraise the literature that directly compared manipulation , mobilisation and the Activator instrument for non-specific neck pain . Methods Electronic data bases ( MEDLINE , MANTIS and CINAHL ) were search ed from their inception to October 2005 for all English language r and omised clinical trials that directly compared manipulation , mobilisation and the Activator instrument . Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to select the studies and these studies were then evaluated using vali date d criteria . Results Five such studies were identified . The method ological quality was mostly poor . Findings from the studies were mixed and no one therapy was shown to be more effective than the others . Conclusion Further high quality research has to be done before a recommendation can be made as to the most effective manual method for non-specific neck pain STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and best evidence synthesis . OBJECTIVES To describe the prevalence and incidence of  neck pain and disability in workers ; to identify risk factors for neck pain in workers ; to propose an etiological diagram ; and to make recommendations for future research . SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Previous review s of the etiology of neck pain in workers relied on cross-sectional evidence . Recently published cohorts and r and omized trials warrant a re- analysis of this body of research . METHODS We systematic ally search ed Medline for literature published from 1980 - 2006 . Retrieved articles were review ed for relevance . Relevant articles were critically appraised . Articles judged to have adequate internal validity were included in our best evidence synthesis . RESULTS One hundred and nine papers on the burden and determinants of neck pain in workers were scientifically admissible . The annual prevalence of neck pain varied from 27.1 % in Norway to 47.8 % in Québec , Canada . Each year , between 11 % and 14.1 % of workers were limited in their activities because of neck pain . Risk factors associated with neck pain in workers include age , previous musculoskeletal pain , high quantitative job dem and s , low social support at work , job insecurity , low physical capacity , poor computer workstation design and work posture , sedentary work position , repetitive work and precision work . We found preliminary evidence that gender , occupation , headaches , emotional problems , smoking , poor job satisfaction , awkward work postures , poor physical work environment , and workers ' ethnicity may be associated with neck pain . There is evidence that interventions aim ed at modifying workstations and worker posture are not effective in reducing the incidence of neck pain in workers . CONCLUSION Neck disorders are a significant source of pain and activity limitations in workers . Most neck pain results from complex relationships between individual and workplace risk factors . No prevention strategies have been shown to reduce the incidence of neck pain in workers Objective To identify potentially effective complementary approaches for musculoskeletal (MSK)–mental health ( MH ) comorbidity , by synthesis ing evidence on effectiveness , cost-effectiveness and safety from systematic review s ( SRs ) . Design Scoping review of SRs . Methods We search ed literature data bases , registries and reference lists , and contacted key authors and professional organisations to identify SRs of r and omised controlled trials for complementary medicine for MSK or MH . Inclusion criteria were : published after 2004 , study ing adults , in English and scoring > 50 % on Assessing the Method ological Quality of Systematic Review s ( AMSTAR ) ; quality appraisal checklist ) . SRs were synthesis ed to identify research priorities , based on moderate/good quality evidence , sample size and indication of cost-effectiveness and safety . Results We included 84 MSK SRs and 27 MH SRs . Only one focused on MSK – MH comorbidity . Meditative approaches and yoga may improve MH outcomes in MSK population s. Yoga and tai chi had moderate/good evidence for MSK and MH conditions . SRs reported moderate/good quality evidence ( any comparator ) in a moderate/large population for :  low back pain ( LBP )  ( yoga , acupuncture , spinal manipulation/mobilisation , osteopathy ) , osteoarthritis ( OA ) ( acupuncture , tai chi ) , neck pain  ( acupuncture , manipulation/manual therapy ) , myofascial trigger point pain ( acupuncture ) , depression ( mindfulness-based stress reduction ( MBSR ) , meditation , tai chi , relaxation ) , anxiety ( meditation/MBSR , moving meditation , yoga ) , sleep disorders ( meditative/mind – body movement ) and stress/distress ( mindfulness ) . The majority of these complementary approaches had some evidence of safety — only three had evidence of harm . There was some evidence of cost-effectiveness for spinal manipulation/mobilisation and acupuncture for LBP , and manual therapy/manipulation for neck pain , but few SRs review ed cost-effectiveness and many found no data . Conclusions Only one SR studied MSK – MH comorbidity . Research priorities for complementary medicine for both MSK and MH ( LBP , OA , depression , anxiety and sleep problems ) are yoga , mindfulness and tai chi . Despite the large number of SRs and the prevalence of comorbidity , more high- quality , large r and omised controlled trials in comorbid population s are needed Low  back pain  has long been described as a challenge for both primary care physicians and specialists . Management of  low back pain  has also been criticized as frequently arbitrary , inappropriate , or ineffective . Contributing factors have been an inadequate evidence base and a need for more rigorous appraisal s of the available literature . Evidence -based medicine , an approach to clinical problem solving , is predicated on the premise that high- quality health care will result from practice s consistent with the best evidence . In contrast to the traditional medical paradigm that placed a heavy reliance on expert opinion , authority , and un systematic clinical observations , evidence -based medicine emphasizes the need for rigorous critical appraisal s of the scientific literature to inform medical decision making . Evidence -based medicine places strong weight on the requirement for valid studies , particularly r and omized controlled trials , to appropriately evaluate the effectiveness of health care interventions . Because of the rapidly increasing volume of medical literature , however , most clinicians are unable to keep up-to- date with all the new data . Two types of preprocessed evidence that can aid busy clinicians in medical decision making are systematic review s and evidence -based clinical practice guidelines . Like primary studies , systematic review s and clinical practice guidelines must adhere to high method ologic st and ards to reduce error and bias . As in other areas of medicine , the approach to the management of low back pain has been positively affected by the availability of more clinical trials and better use of critical appraisal techniques to evaluate and apply research findings . In addition to more rigorous primary studies , an increasing number of high- quality systematic review s and evidence -based clinical practice guidelines for low back pain are also available . Although some research gaps and method ologic shortcomings persist , the richer evidence base has greatly improved our underst and ing of what does and does not work for low back pain . Despite these advances , the best available evidence often does not inform everyday clinical decisions for low back pain . Nonetheless , there is widespread agreement that adherence to evidence -based practice will help improve low back pain patient outcomes and reduce arbitrary variations in care . This article review s basic principles of evidence -based medicine , discusses evidence -based medicine in the context of low back pain management , and summarizes some useful evidence -based medicine re sources Background Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with critical illness often experience significant physical impairments , which typically persist for many years following resolution of the original illness . Physical rehabilitation interventions that enhance restoration of physical function have been evaluated across the continuum of recovery following critical illness including within the intensive care unit , following discharge to the ward and beyond hospital discharge . Multiple systematic review s have been published appraising the exp and ing evidence investigating these physical rehabilitation interventions , although there appears to be variability in review methodology and quality . We aim to conduct an overview of existing systematic review s of physical rehabilitation interventions for adult intensive care patients across the continuum of recovery . Methods / design This protocol has been developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses Protocol ( PRISMA -P ) guidelines . We will search the Cochrane Systematic Review Data base , Data base of Abstract s of Review s of Effectiveness , Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , MEDLINE , Excerpta Medica Data base and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature data bases . We will include systematic review s of r and omised controlled trials of adult patients , admitted to the intensive care unit and who have received physical rehabilitation interventions at any time point during their recovery . Data extraction will include systematic review aims and rationale , study types , population s , interventions , comparators , outcomes and quality appraisal method . Primary outcomes of interest will focus on findings reflecting recovery of physical function . Quality of reporting and method ological quality will be appraised using the PRISMA checklist and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Review s tool . Discussion We anticipate the findings from this novel overview of systematic review s will contribute to the synthesis and interpretation of existing evidence regarding physical rehabilitation interventions and physical recovery in post-critical illness patients across the continuum of recovery . Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42015001068 PURPOSE We systematic ally review ed r and omized and quasi-r and omized clinical trials in the literature to assess the efficacy of neck stabilization and postural exercises on pain , neck range of motion , and time off work in adults with acute whiplash-associated disorders . METHODS Electronic data bases , reference lists of relevant Cochrane review s , reference lists of studies selected for inclusion , and tables of contents of relevant journals were systematic ally search ed for r and omized and quasi-r and omized controlled trials . Two independent review ers selected studies for inclusion , assessed method ological quality , and extracted data . Because of the heterogeneity of the interventions , a qualitative synthesis was performed using " levels of evidence " as recommended by van Tulder et al. RESULTS Eight studies representing five clinical trials were selected for inclusion . Two trials were grade d as high quality , two as moderate quality , and one as low quality . Many of these studies had mixed results , demonstrating significant differences on some outcome measures but not on others . CONCLUSIONS There is moderate evidence to support the use of postural exercises for decreasing pain and time off work in the treatment of patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders . However , no evidence exists to support the use of postural exercises for increasing neck range of motion . There is conflicting evidence in support of neck stabilization exercises in the treatment of patients with acute whiplash-associated disorders Background Falls can have a considerable impact on a patients ' well being , they can result in serious physical and emotional injury , poor quality of life and increased length of hospital stay . Most of the current literature recommends a comprehensive approach to fall prevention that addresses a wide variety of risk factors and involves the use of risk assessment . Objective The objective of this review was to present the best available evidence for the effectiveness of interventions design ed to reduce the incidence of falls in older adult patients in acute care hospitals . Inclusion Criteria Types of Studies Only r and omised controlled trials ( RCTs ) assessing the effectiveness of risk assessment or other interventions that aim ed to minimise the number of falls were included . Types of Participants Participants were older adult in patients ( defined as aged 65 years or over ) in acute care hospitals . Types of Interventions This review focused on interventions design ed to assess the risk of falling or those used to minimise the risk of falling in older adult hospital patients . These interventions were compared to either st and ard practice , which included any method or technique already in place at the facility , or no intervention . Types of Outcome measures The primary outcome was the number of patient falls during hospitalisation . Search Strategy A search for published and unpublished literature from 1998 to 2008 published in the English language was conducted using all major electronic data bases . A three‐step search strategy was developed using MeSH terminology and keywords to ensure that all material relevant to the review was captured . Assessment of Quality The method ological quality of included studies was assessed by two review ers , who appraised each study independently , using st and ardised Joanna Briggs Institute ( JBI ) critical appraisal tools Data Collection and Analysis Data was extracted from the studies that were identified as meeting the criteria for method ological quality using the st and ard JBI data extraction tools . Due to the heterogeneity of population s and interventions , meta‐analyses were not possible and results are presented in narrative form . Results and Conclusions Seven studies were included in the review . The evidence on interventions for reducing the number of falls in older adults during their stay in an acute health care facility is sparse . There is some evidence to suggest that certain multifactorial interventions are more effective than others and that increasing patient education or targeting fall risk factors may be of benefit . Further high quality research is needed in order to ascertain effective fall prevention strategies in acute care facilities . Implication s for Practice There are some evidence to suggest that implementing the following interventions in acute hospitals may be effective in reducing the amount of falls of older adult in patients : ˙ a multidisciplinary multifactorial intervention program consisting of a falls risk alert card , an exercise program , an education program and the use of hip protectors after approximately 45 days ˙ a one‐on‐one patient education package entailing information on risk factors and preventative strategies for falls as well as goal setting ˙ a targeted falls risk factor reduction intervention that includes a falls risk factor screen , recommended interventions encompassing local advice and a summary of the evidence There is some evidence to suggest that implementing a multidisciplinary multifactorial intervention that consists of systematic assessment and treatment of fall risk factors , as well as active management of postoperative complications can reduce the amount of falls in patients with femoral neck fracture following surgery . Implication s for Research Better design ed RCTs that distinguish subgroups of population s ( for example people with or without cognitive impairment ) and that targets interventions at specific groups is required . Further research that focuses on individual intervention components that are part of larger multifactorial interventions are also warranted Study Design . A critical appraisal of the literature . Objectives . To increase awareness of the importance of applicability and clinical relevance of the results of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) in the field of spinal disorders by formulating a list of items for assessment of applicability and clinical relevance of results of RCTs . Summary of Background Data . In systematic review s of r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , critical appraisal of method ologic quality is considered important . Less attention has been paid to the assessment of the applicability and the clinical relevance of the results . Methods . RCTs in an up date of the Cochrane review on  exercise therapy for low back pain were used . Most of the trials did not score positively on the five Cochrane Back Review Group basic items describing patients : intervention and setting , outcome , effect size , and benefits related to adverse effects . Item 1 was met by 88 % of the trials , but item 2 only by 51 % , item 3 by 67 % , item 4 by 35 % , and item 5 by 0 % . Subsequently , a more comprehensive list of items for the assessment of applicability and clinical relevance of results of RCTs was developed . These criteria were pilot tested on the RCTs . After pilot testing and a subsequent consensus meeting , the list of items was drafted and circulated among the members of the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back Review Group . Changes were made in response to comments . Results . The final list consists of 40 items . The items are ordered on two headings : Does the report enable the assessment of applicability ? Are the study results clinical ly relevant ? We present examples of informative and noninformative reporting of RCTs in order to illustrate how information on applicability and clinical relevance of results can be assessed . Conclusions . Authors of RCTs should adequately report on items that are essential to assess the applicability and clinical relevance of results . The presented list of items may help clinicians reading RCTs and authors of systematic review s to draw more balanced conclusions on applicability and clinical relevance of results Synthesizing evidence from r and omized controlled trials of  digital health education  poses some challenges . These include a lack of clear categorization of digital health education in the literature ; constantly evolving concepts , pedagogies , or theories ; and a multitude of methods , features , technologies , or delivery setting s. The Digital Health Education Collaboration was established to evaluate the evidence on digital education in health professions ; inform policymakers , educators , and students ; and ultimately , change the way in which these professionals learn and are taught . The aim of this paper is to present the overarching methodology that we use to synthesize evidence across our digital health education review s and to discuss challenges related to the process . For our research , we followed Cochrane recommendations for the conduct of systematic review s ; all review s are reported according to the PRISMA ( Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review s and Meta-Analyses ) guidance . This included assembling experts in various digital health education fields ; identifying gaps in the evidence base ; formulating focused research questions , aims , and outcome measures ; choosing appropriate search terms and data bases ; defining inclusion and exclusion criteria ; running the search es jointly with librarians and information specialists ; managing abstract s ; retrieving full-text versions of papers ; extracting and storing large data sets , critically appraising the quality of studies ; analyzing data ; discussing findings ; drawing meaningful conclusions ; and drafting research papers . The approach used for synthesizing evidence from digital health education trials is commonly regarded as the most rigorous benchmark for conducting systematic review s. Although we acknowledge the presence of certain biases ingrained in the process , we have clearly highlighted and minimized those biases by strictly adhering to scientific rigor , method ological integrity , and st and ard operating procedures . This paper will be a valuable asset for research ers and method ologists undertaking systematic review s in digital health education OBJECTIVE To review the biomedical literature up to and including 2003 , and determine the extent of the evidence related to the therapeutic application of chiropractic manipulation for paediatric health conditions . No critical appraisal of the evidence is undertaken . DATA SOURCES The indexed manual therapy sector including medical , chiropractic , physiotherapy , naturopathic and osteopathic literature was search ed . This included PubMed ; the Manual , Alternative , and Natural Therapy Index System ; the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature ; the Index to Chiropractic Literature ; the Paediatric Economic Data base Evaluation Project ; the Cochrane Library ; the Canadian Coordinating Office for Health Technology Assessment data base ; and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality data base . Other re sources included research conference and symposium proceedings , and the references of identified studies . RESULT The search identified 1731 articles , of which 166 met the eligibility criteria . Two review ers determined by consensus each citation 's appropriate level on the strength of evidence scale . There was one systematic review , nine r and omized controlled trials , one observational study , 141 descriptive case studies and 14 conference abstract s. SUMMARY Health cl aims made by practitioners regarding the application of chiropractic manipulation as a health care intervention for paediatric health conditions are , for the most part , supported by low levels of scientific evidence . Chiropractors , in particular , employ manipulation for the treatment of a wide variety of paediatric health conditions . The evidence rests primarily with clinical experience , descriptive case studies and a few r and omized controlled trials . There is a need for more rigorous scientific inquiry to examine the value of manipulative therapy in the treatment of paediatric conditions . To advance the health interests of paediatric patients , health care decisions made on the basis of expert opinion or clinical experience must integrate the best research evidence available from high- quality , scientific studies Background The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is ubiquitous . Complications and costs of diabetes are rising and are depleting limited re sources . It is imperative for healthcare professionals and patients alike to confront this chronic condition by exploring new interventions . An innovative health care delivery model has emerged in the last 25 years in the form of the group medical visit . Group medical visits can range from of six to twenty patients scheduled together with time allotted for individual care as well as in the group setting . Objectives The review objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta‐ analysis to synthesize the best available evidence related to effectiveness of group medical visits on HbA1c , blood pressure and cholesterol measurements /levels for adult patients with type II diabetes in outpatient setting s. Search strategy A three‐step literature search for studies in English language from 1990 to 2010 was conducted utilising ( a ) a primary search of Medline , CINAHL , PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials , ( b ) a secondary search of non‐indexed data bases , and ( c ) a search of the grey literature . In addition , a manual review of the reference lists of all identified reports and articles was performed to identify additional studies . Inclusion criteria All r and omised and quasi‐experimental studies of adult patients ( > 18 ) with type II diabetes mellitus seen in outpatient health setting s were considered if they met one or more of the following diagnostic outcome measurements : haemoglobin A1c , systolic and diastolic blood pressure , and low density lipoprotein cholesterol . Critical appraisal , data collection and analysis Each of the eligible articles was review ed by two independent review ers . Disagreements between the review ers were resolved through discussion , or with a third review er . Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for method ological quality using the JBI st and ardized critical appraisal tools . Data extraction was undertaken using the st and ardised data extraction tool from JBI‐MAStARI . Main results The search strategy identified 2,040 articles in the published and unpublished literature . Of these , 11 r and omised controlled trials and 4 quasi‐experimental trials met the inclusion criteria and represented 2240 patients included in the final review . There are clear benefits of group medical visits for patients ' HbA1c levels which are consistent in the post‐intervention and change from baseline effect sizes . The most significant effect observed is with the change from baseline results . Some evidence suggests post‐intervention and change from baseline systolic blood pressure improvement at the nine to twelve month interval and change from baseline improvement at the 4 year timeframe . There is no evidence that group visits improve LDL cholesterol values of the group visit participants . Conclusions Group medical visits should be considered by clinicians as an effective non‐pharmacologic intervention that can have a positive impact on biologic markers such as haemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure . Implication s for practice The evidence suggests that the most powerful model of Group medical visits ( GMV ) is when a clinician prescriber is present during or immediately after GMV sessions for medication reconciliation or individual patient needs . Implication s for research Future research should include this GMV intervention in r and omised controlled trials across different health systems and socio‐economic and ethnic groups An investigation was made as to whether studies have found  journal clubs for physicians in training to be effective for improving patient . care , teaching critical appraisal skills , improving reading habits , increasing knowledge of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics , and increasing the use of medical literature in clinical practice . A literature search was undertaken using 10 data bases and retrieval systems and h and search es of journals , conference proceedings and personal files . The rigor of studies meeting the inclusion criteria was analyzed using a protocol based on methods established by the Cochrane Collaboration . One r and omized controlled trial found an improvement in knowledge of clinical epidemiology and biostaristics , reading habits , and the use of medical literature in practice , but no improvement in critical appraisal skills . Six less method ologically rigorous studies found possible improvement in critical appraisal skills . It is concluded that journal clubs may improve knowledge of clinical epidemiology and biostatistics , reading habits , and the use of medical literature in practice . A multi-center , r and omized controlled trial of journal clubs is needed to assess whether journal clubs improve critical appraisal skills BACKGROUND Chronic refractory spinal pain poses a peculiar diagnostic challenge because of multiple putative pain sources , overlapping clinical features , and nonspecific radiologic findings . Diagnostic injection techniques are employed to isolate the source ( s ) of pain . Facet or zygapophysial joint pain is an example of spinal pain diagnosed by local anesthetic injections of the facet joint or its nerve supply . Diagnostic facet joint injections are expected to meet the cardinal features of a diagnostic test ( i.e. , accuracy , safety and reproducibility ) . Accuracy must be compared with a " gold " or criterion st and ard that can confirm presence or absence of a disease . There is , however , no available gold st and ard , such as biopsy , to measure presence or absence of pain . Hence , there is a degree of uncertainty concerning the accuracy of diagnostic facet joint injections . OBJECTIVES To evaluate accuracy , safety and reproducibility of facet or zygapophysial joint injections in diagnosing chronic spinal pain of facet joint origin . STUDY DESIGN A systematic review of the literature for clinical studies on efficacy and utility of facet joint/nerve injections in diagnosing spinal pain from facet joints . METHODS Relevant literature on diagnostic facet injections was identified through data base search es . Excluded were abstract s , review s , book chapters , case reports and studies based on single blocks or blocks without radiologic control . Prospect i ve studies with placebo control , or controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks , were given priority over retrospective studies . Each study was grade d using AHRQ and QUADAS criteria . The level of evidence was classified as conclusive , strong , moderate , limited , or inconclusive . RESULTS Available literature pointed to strong evidence for controlled comparative local anesthetic facet joint medial branch blocks in the diagnosis of neck and low back pain . There was moderate evidence in the diagnosis of pain arising from thoracic facet joints . CONCLUSION The evidence obtained from literature review suggests that controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks of facet joint nerves ( medial branch or dorsal ramus ) are reproducible , reasonably accurate , and safe . The sensitivity , specificity , false-positive rates , and predictive values of these diagnostic tests for neck and low back pain have been vali date d and reproduced in multiple studies Background The efficacy of natural products ( NPs ) is being evaluated using r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) with increasing frequency , yet a search of the literature did not identify a widely accepted critical appraisal instrument developed specifically for use with NPs . The purpose of this project was to develop and evaluate a critical appraisal instrument that is sufficiently rigorous to be used in evaluating RCTs of conventional medicines , and also has a section specific for use with single entity NPs , including herbs and natural source d chemicals . Methods Three phases of the project included : 1 ) using experts and a Delphi process to reach consensus on a list of items essential in describing the identity of an NP ; 2 ) compiling a list of non-NP items important for evaluating the quality of an RCT using systematic review methodology to identify published instruments and then compiling item categories that were part of a vali date d instrument and /or had empirical evidence to support their inclusion and 3 ) conducting a field test to compare the new instrument to a published instrument for usefulness in evaluating the quality of 3 RCTs of a NP and in applying results to practice . Results Two Delphi rounds result ed in a list of 15 items essential in describing NPs . Seventeen item categories fitting inclusion criteria were identified from published instruments for conventional medicines . The new assessment instrument was assembled based on content of the two lists and the addition of a Review er 's Conclusion section . The field test of the new instrument showed good criterion validity . Participants found it useful in translating evidence from RCTs to practice . Conclusion A new instrument for the critical appraisal of RCTs of NPs was developed and tested . The instrument is distinct from other available assessment instruments for RCTs of NPs in its systematic development and validation . The instrument is ready to be used by pharmacy students , health care practitioners and academics and will continue to be refined as required INTRODUCTION Soft tissue injuries of the leg , ankle , or foot are common and often treated by exercise . The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of  exercise  for the management of soft tissue injuries of the leg , ankle , or foot . METHODS A systematic review of the literature was conducted . We search ed five data bases from 1990 to 2015 . Relevant articles were critically appraised using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network ( SIGN ) criteria . The evidence from studies with low risk of bias was synthesized using the best- evidence synthesis methodology . RESULTS We screened 7946 articles . We critically appraised ten r and omized trials and six had a low risk of bias . The evidence suggests that for recent lateral ankle sprain : 1 ) rehabilitation exercises initiated immediately post-injury are as effective as a similar program initiated one week post-injury ; and 2 ) supervised progressive exercise plus education/advice and home exercise lead to similar outcomes as education/advice and home exercise . Eccentric exercises may be more effective than an AirHeel brace but less effective than acupuncture for Achilles tendinopathy of more than two months duration . Finally , for plantar heel pain , static stretching of the calf muscles and sham ultrasound lead to similar outcomes , while static plantar fascia stretching provides short-term benefits compared to shockwave therapy . CONCLUSIONS We found little evidence to support the use of early or supervised exercise interventions for lateral ankle sprains . Eccentric exercises may provide short-term benefits over a brace for persistent Achilles tendinopathy and plantar fascia stretching provides short-term benefits for plantar heel pain OBJECTIVE To examine the evidence that the teaching of critical appraisal ( evidence -based medicine ) skills to undergraduate medical students or residents will result in significant gains in knowledge and increased use of the literature in clinical decision-making . DATA SOURCES Articles published from 1966 to 1995 , retrieved through a MEDLINE search supplemented by manual search es ; review of bibliographies maintained by individuals involved in teaching critical appraisal skills ; and a previous method ological review . STUDY SELECTION Articles were selected if the study involved some form of control group , although strict r and omization was not required , and a measure of performance followed the intervention . Articles were excluded if they simply reported the process of teaching critical appraisal skills or used some form of " happiness index . " DATA SYNTHESIS There were 10 studies of the impact of teaching critical appraisal skills  , 6 involving medical students and 4 involving residents . Results from 3 of the studies were nearly uninterpretable and thus were excluded ; the remaining 7 were method ologically acceptable . Analysis showed that interventions implemented in undergraduate programs result ed in significant gains in knowledge , as assessed by a written test ( mean gain 17.0 % ; st and ard deviation [ SD ] 4.0 % ) . Conversely , studies at the residency level consistently showed a small change in knowledge ( mean gain 1.3 % ; SD 1.7 % ) . Two studies that examined residents ' use of the literature were unable to demonstrate any positive changes . CONCLUSIONS Studies of the effect of teaching critical appraisal skills on gains in knowledge at the undergraduate level showed consistent improvement . By contrast , changes in knowledge at the residency level were small . Several suggestions from the educational literature are offered to increase effectiveness of critical appraisal interventions Abstract Purpose To evaluate the effectiveness of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ( NSAIDs ) for the management of neck pain and associated disorders ( NAD ) , whiplash-associated disorders , and non-specific low back pain ( LBP ) with or without radiculopathy . Methods We systematic ally search ed six data bases from 2000 to 2014 . R and om pairs of independent review ers critically appraised eligible systematic review s using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network criteria . We included systematic review s with a low risk of bias in our best evidence synthesis . Results We screened 706 citations and 14 systematic review s were eligible for critical appraisal . Eight systematic review s had a low risk of bias . For recent-onset NAD , evidence suggests that intramuscular NSAIDs lead to similar outcomes as combined manipulation and soft tissue therapy . For NAD ( duration not specified ) , oral NSAIDs may be more effective than placebo . For recent-onset LBP , evidence suggests that : ( 1 ) oral NSAIDs lead to similar outcomes to placebo or a muscle relaxant ; and ( 2 ) oral NSAIDs with bed rest lead to similar outcomes as placebo with bed rest . For persistent LBP , evidence suggests that : ( 1 ) oral NSAIDs are more effective than placebo ; and ( 2 ) oral NSAIDs may be more effective than acetaminophen . For recent-onset LBP with radiculopathy , there is inconsistent evidence on the effectiveness of oral NSAIDs versus placebo . Finally , different oral NSAIDs lead to similar outcomes for neck and LBP with or without radiculopathy . Conclusions For NAD , oral NSAIDs may be more effective than placebo . Oral NSAIDs are more effective than placebo for persistent LBP , but not for recent-onset LBP . Different oral NSAIDs lead to similar outcomes for neck pain and LBP Background Personalized healthcare relies on the identification of factors explaining why individuals respond differently to the same intervention . Analyses identifying such factors , so called predictors and moderators , have their own set of assumptions and limitations which , when violated , can result in misleading cl aims , and incorrect actions . The aim of this study was to develop a checklist for critically appraising the results of predictor and moderator analyses by combining recommendations from published guidelines and experts in the field . Methods C and i date criteria for the checklist were retrieved through systematic search es of the literature . These criteria were evaluated for appropriateness using a Delphi procedure . Two Delphi rounds yielded a pilot checklist , which was tested on a set of papers included in a systematic review on reinforced home-based palliative care . The results of the pilot informed a third Delphi round , which served to finalize the checklist . Results Forty-nine appraisal criteria were identified in the literature . Feedback was obtained from fourteen experts from (bio)statistics , epidemiology and other associated fields elicited via three Delphi rounds . Additional feedback from other research ers was collected in a pilot test . The final version of our checklist included seventeen criteria , covering the design ( e.g. a priori plausibility ) , analysis ( e.g. use of interaction tests ) and results ( e.g. complete reporting ) of moderator and predictor analysis , together with the transferability of the results ( e.g. clinical importance ) . There are criteria both for individual papers and for bodies of evidence . Conclusions The proposed checklist can be used for critical appraisal of reported moderator and predictor effects , as assessed in r and omized or non-r and omized studies using individual participant or aggregate data . This checklist is accompanied by a user ’s guide to facilitate implementation . Its future use across a wide variety of research domains and study types will provide insights about its usability and feasibility This is the last in a series of four articles Prognostic studies include clinical studies of variables predictive of future events as well as epidemiological studies of aetiological risk factors . As multiple similar studies accumulate it becomes increasingly important to identify and evaluate all of the relevant studies to develop a more reliable overall assessment . For prognostic studies this is not straightforward . Box 1 summarises the clinical importance of information on prognostic factors . Many of the issues discussed are also relevant to aetiological studies , especially cohort ones . Some features of prognostic studies lead to particular difficulties for the systematic review er . Firstly , in most clinical prognostic studies the outcome of primary interest is the time to an event , often death . Meta- analysis of such studies is rather more difficult than that for binary data or continuous measurements . Secondly , in many context s the prognostic variable of interest is often one of several prognostic variables . When examining a variable of interest research ers should consider other prognostic variables with which it might be correlated . Thirdly , many prognostic factors are continuous variables , for which research ers use a wide variety of methods of analysis . # # # # Summary points Systematic review s are applicable to all types of research design , and studies of prognostic variables are an important additional area where appropriate methodology should be applied Prognostic variables should be evaluated in a representative sample of patients assembled at a common point in the course of their disease — ideally they should all have received the same medical treatment or been in a r and omised trial When examined critically , a high proportion of prognostic studies are found to be method ologically poor Meta- analysis of published data is hampered by difficulties in extraction of data and variation in the characteristics of the study and patients The poor quality of the published literature is a strong argument in favour Background The Promoting Action on Research Implementation in  Health Services framework  , or PARIHS , is a conceptual framework that posits key , interacting elements that influence successful implementation of evidence -based practice s. It has been widely cited and used as the basis for empirical work ; however , there has not yet been a literature review to examine how the framework has been used in implementation projects and research . The purpose of the present article was to critically review and synthesize the literature on PARIHS to underst and how it has been used and operationalized , and to highlight its strengths and limitations . Methods We conducted a qualitative , critical synthesis of peer- review ed PARIHS literature published through March 2009 . We synthesized findings through a three-step process using semi-structured data abstract ion tools and group consensus . Results Twenty-four articles met our inclusion criteria : six core concept articles from original PARIHS authors , and eighteen empirical articles ranging from case reports to quantitative studies . Empirical articles generally used PARIHS as an organizing framework for analyses . No studies used PARIHS prospect ively to design implementation strategies , and there was generally a lack of detail about how variables were measured or mapped , or how conclusions were derived . Several studies used findings to comment on the framework in ways that could help refine or vali date it . The primary issue identified with the framework was a need for greater conceptual clarity regarding the definition of sub-elements and the nature of dynamic relationships . Strengths identified included its flexibility , intuitive appeal , explicit acknowledgement of the outcome of ' successful implementation , ' and a more expansive view of what can and should constitute ' evidence . ' Conclusions While we found studies reporting empirical support for PARIHS , the single greatest need for this and other implementation models is rigorous , prospect i ve use of the framework to guide implementation projects . There is also need to better explain derived findings and how interventions or measures are mapped to specific PARIHS elements ; greater conceptual discrimination among sub-elements may be necessary first . In general , it may be time for the implementation science community to develop consensus guidelines for reporting the use and usefulness of theoretical frameworks within implementation studies Traditional clinical review articles , also known as up date s , differ from systematic review s and meta-analyses . Up date s selectively review the medical literature while discussing a topic broadly . Non-quantitative systematic review s comprehensively examine the medical literature , seeking to identify and synthesize all relevant information to formulate the best approach to diagnosis or treatment . Meta-analyses ( quantitative systematic review s ) seek to answer a focused clinical question , using rigorous statistical analysis of pooled research studies . This article presents guidelines for writing an evidence -based clinical review article for American Family Physician . First , the topic should be of common interest and relevance to family practice . Include a table of the continuing medical education objectives of the review . State how the literature search was done and include several sources of evidence -based review s , such as the Cochrane Collaboration , BMJ 's Clinical Evidence , or the InfoRetriever Web site . Where possible , use evidence based on clinical outcomes relating to morbidity , mortality , or quality of life , and studies of primary care population s. In articles su bmi tted to American Family Physician , rate the level of evidence for key recommendations according to the following scale : level A ( r and omized controlled trial [ RCT ] , meta- analysis ) ; level B ( other evidence ) ; level C ( consensus/expert opinion ) . Finally , provide a table of key summary points Systematic review s , a cornerstone of evidence -based medicine , are not produced quickly enough to support clinical practice . The cost of production , availability of the requisite expertise and timeliness are often quoted as major contributors for the delay . This detailed survey of the state of the art of information systems design ed to support or automate individual tasks in the systematic review , and in particular systematic review s of r and omized controlled clinical trials , reveals trends that see the convergence of several parallel research projects . We surveyed literature describing informatics systems that support or automate the processes of systematic review or each of the tasks of the systematic review . Several projects focus on automating , simplifying and /or streamlining specific tasks of the systematic review . Some tasks are already fully automated while others are still largely manual . In this review , we describe each task and the effect that its automation would have on the entire systematic review process , summarize the existing information system support for each task , and highlight where further research is needed for realizing automation for the task . Integration of the systems that automate systematic review tasks may lead to a revised systematic review workflow . We envisage the optimized workflow will lead to system in which each systematic review is described as a computer program that automatically retrieves relevant trials , appraises them , extracts and synthesizes data , evaluates the risk of bias , performs meta- analysis calculations , and produces a report in real time UNLABELLED EXECUTIVE SUMMARY : BACKGROUND Anticipation of an invasive procedure in hospital is likely to provoke feelings of anxiety and stress in patients . An unfamiliar environment , loss of control , perceived or actual physical risk , dependence on strangers and separation from friends and family are all factors that can contribute to the development of such feelings . Recently , there has been considerable interest in the anxiolytic potential of music listening in a variety of clinical setting s , yet thus far , little is known about the impact of music listening on the pre-procedural patient population . A systematic review of all literature to date was indicated to improve underst and ing of outcomes and impact of music listening on pre-procedural anxiety , thus helping nurses decide whether or not to incorporate music listening into practice and to highlight a need , or otherwise , for a related primary research agenda . OBJECTIVE The objective of this review was to determine the best available evidence on the effectiveness of music listening in reducing adult hospital patients ' pre-procedural state anxiety .  INCLUSION CRITERIA Types of studies This review included r and omised controlled trials and quasi-experimental research design s that examined the efficacy of music listening in reducing state anxiety among pre-procedural hospital patients published between January 1985 and February 2006 . The search was limited to publications after 1985 to coincide with the increasing interest and use of complementary therapies within health care during the 1980s and 1990s . Types of participants Participants of interest to the review were adult day patients , ambulatory patients and in patients who were about to undergo any type of clinical procedure . Types of intervention The review focused on studies that investigated pre-procedural music listening employed and prescribed as a potentially therapeutic activity . It excluded any other form of music therapy . Types of outcome measures The primary outcome measures examined were alterations in state anxiety and a variety of physiological variables such as blood pressure and respiration and heart rates . SEARCH STRATEGY A search for published and unpublished literature between January 1985 and February 2006 was conducted using all major electronic data bases . A three-step search strategy was devised which consisted of using high-precision MeSH terminology and keywords to ensure that all material relevant to the review was captured . CRITICAL APPRAISAL : The method ological quality of included studies was assessed by two review ers , who appraised each study independently , using the st and ard Joanna Briggs Institute ( JBI ) critical appraisal tools . DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Data were extracted from the studies that were identified as meeting the criteria for method ological quality using a data - extraction tool developed for the review . Studies were grouped by outcome measure and summarised using tabular and narrative formats . RESULTS The review demonstrated that state anxiety is defined and measured using both psychological and physiological parameters . Music listening had a consistently positive and statistically significant effect on reducing psychological parameters of pre-procedural state anxiety . However , the results from the measurement of various pre-procedural physiological parameters failed to reveal any consistent positive changes in patients who had listened to music .  This calls into question the adequacy of the theories in this area which link anxiety and the automated and central nervous systems and the effect that music listening may have on these processes and physiological responses . CONCLUSIONS / IMPLICATION S FOR PRACTICE 1 In order to reduce anxiety , it is likely that patients will benefit psychologically from having the opportunity to listen to music in the immediate pre-procedural period . 2 Patients do not appear to experience any alteration in physiological status as a result of listening to music . 3 Further research is indicated in order to replicate existing studies , to strengthen the evidence to support such interventions and to establish intervention parameters . 4 Further research is needed analysing the physiological mechanisms by which music listening is believed to reduce state anxiety and the contribution of the automated and other nervous systems to this reduction A systematic review of the literature was performed to evaluate the role of exercise in treating rotator cuff impingement and to synthesize a st and ard evidence -based rehabilitation protocol . Eleven r and omized , controlled trials ( level 1 and 2 ) evaluating the effect of exercise in the treatment of impingement were identified . Data regarding demographics , methodology , and outcomes of pain , range of motion , strength , and function were recorded . Individual components of each rehabilitation program were catalogued . Effectiveness was determined by statistical and clinical significance . Although many articles had method ologic concerns , the data demonstrate that exercise has statistically and clinical ly significant effects on pain reduction and improving function , but not on range of motion or strength .  Manual therapy augments the effects of exercise  , yet supervised exercise was not different than home exercise programs . Information regarding specific components of the exercise programs was synthesized into a gold st and ard rehabilitation protocol for future studies on the nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff impingement Objective : To determine whether an interactive seminar could affect medical student  knowledge of research design , basic critical appraisal skills , and attitudes toward and clinical use of the medical literature . Design : Controlled , nonr and omized clinical trial Participants : Third-year clinical clerks ( n=146 ) during their core medicine clerkship . Interventions : Two 90 minute interactive seminars . Measurements and main results : Pre- and post question naires were used to assess knowledge and attitudes regarding the use of the medical literature among 65 study and 81 control students . Blinded review of write-ups assessed actual use of the medical literature . Overall , 80 % of the students subscribed to one or more journals and reported reading three or more journal articles per month . After the intervention , the study students were more likely than the control students to consider : 1 ) study design important in article selection and 2 ) use of medical literature critical to patient care decisions . Knowledge scores were significantly improved in the study group ( p=0.0001 ) . The intervention yielded no increase in the actual use of medical literature in patient write-ups over that encouraged by usual clerkship goals . 51 % of the study and 48 % of the control students cited literature at baseline , and 53 % of all the students did so after the intervention . Of these citations , 50 % were for journal articles and the remainder were for textbooks . The students infrequently mentioned the quality of the cited literature . Conclusions : An interactive seminar design ed to introduce medical students to critical appraisal improved student knowledge and attitudes but did not increase the actual use of literature in patient writeups Zygapophysial or facet joints have been implicated as cause of low back , mid back , upper back and neck pain with referred pain . Cervical , thoracic and lumbar facet joints are innervated by the medial branches of the dorsal rami . Zygapophysial ( facet ) joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15 % to 45 % of the patients with chronic low back pain , 54 % to 60 % of the patients with chronic neck pain and 48 % of the patients with thoracic pain . A systematic review of the evidence of effectiveness of radiofrequency denervation in the management of chronic spinal pain was undertaken . This review included r and omized clinical trials , as well as non-r and omized or observational studies in the analysis . Literature search included MEDLINE , EMBASE , systematic review s , narrative review s , cross-references to the review s and various published trials ; and peer review ed abstract s from scientific meetings during the past two years . An algorithmic approach was followed in study evaluation with a description of inclusion and exclusion criteria . A set of high-performing scales or checklists pertaining to r and omized clinical trials and observational trials derived from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) was utilized ; Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence . Qualitative analysis was conducted , using five levels of evidence for effectiveness of medial branch neurotomy . Our search strategy identified over 1,000 citations as the result of electronic and manual screening . A total of 7 r and omized trials of radiofrequency neurotomy for spinal pain were identified . However , only 4 related to medial branch neurotomy . Two of the four met the inclusion criteria . Among the multiple observational studies considered for inclusion , 4 prospect i ve evaluations were included in the systematic review . In addition , 3 retrospective evaluations were also included . Two r and omized trials comprised of 27 patients receiving active treatment . The first study consisted of cervical facet joint pain and the second consisted of lumbar facet joint pain . Both studies showed positive results . Similar to r and omized trials , prospect i ve , as well as retrospective evaluations showed positive evidence , both in short-term and long-term . The results of this systematic review of 2 well- design ed r and omized trials , 4 prospect i ve well- design ed trials without r and omization and 3 retrospective evaluations provided strong evidence that radiofrequency denervation offers short-term relief and moderate evidence of long-term pain relief of facet joint origin Since the publication of Physicians for the Twenty-First Century —‘‘the GPEP Report ’ ’ of 1984 , medical educators have identified the need for physicians to become lifelong learners . Part of the impetus for this conclusion arises from several studies that have demonstrated that knowledge and /or competence of physicians  decline as a function of time since graduation ; the evidence indicates the cause to be failure to acquire new knowledge rather than a tendency to forget previously learned material . Thus , physicians need to be trained to identify the relevant medical literature ( i.e. , information-seeking skills ) and to apply ‘ ‘ critical appraisal ’’ techniques to analyze potentially useful articles culled from the literature search . There is little published evidence that educational interventions around critical appraisal teaching in undergraduate or postgraduate medical curricula impact in a sustained way the knowledge of epidemiologic principles or the critical application of current research information for clinical decision making . In considering the impact on conceptual knowledge , one could argue that there is a lack of vali date d tools available for evaluating critical appraisal skills ; alternatively , the format of instruction , timing in the curriculum , and duration of instruction may be at fault . More important , studies have not addressed the issue of whether the demonstration of mastery of particular critical appraisal skills can be related to clinical decision making . Ultimately , such mastery becomes largely irrelevant if it does not translate into better judgment . The authors of this study were concerned that , despite the inclusion in the first-year undergraduate curriculum of several focused objectives surrounding critical appraisal in the domain of clinical epidemiology , feedback from clinical faculty suggested that students had only rudimentary knowledge of the application of these principles at the end of the first year . In contrast to this feedback , problem-based learning ( PBL ) is believed to hold the potential to equip graduates with the skills to learn after graduation . In fact , several studies have shown significant differences between students of PBL  and students of conventional curricula in the use of recently published medical literature . With this inconsistency in mind , two experimental questions were asked The m and ate of Human Reproduction Up date involves several roles : ( i ) to provide a synthesis of evidence that can aid scientists and clinicians in their daily work ; ( ii ) to help reproductive specialists underst and concepts from related disciplines ; and ( iii ) to summarize current knowledge generated by basic science as the foundation of future scientific and clinical advancement . Given that review and synthesis are central to good scientific and clinical practice , and that a grasp of the current state of knowledge is a prerequisite to design ing new studies , it is pertinent to ask which review s are most likely to fulfil the needs of readers . A related question concerns whether systematic review s meet the needs of all review topics and all readers . Summarizing evidence or knowledge is a difficult problem in reproductive medicine , as in other branches of science and medical care ( Eddy et al. , 1992 ) . For each question there may be multiple studies that use different design s and inclusion criteria . For clinical questions , the interventions , outcomes and measures of effect may vary : the effect measures in treatment studies include odds ratios , relative risks and absolute differences . For scientific questions , the experimental species , models and design s may differ . Moreover , it is always uncertain whether all of the relevant evidence has been evaluated . Even when the search has been exhaustive , there are no simple guides on how to interpret conflicting results and whether to accept apparently outlying studies . The choices that the review er makes to address the variable conditions and uncertainties may be conservative , strict and exclusive , or liberal , open and inclusive . The decisions made by the review er may not be consistent throughout and these choices may or may not satisfy the reader who seeks out the review to address a clinical or research question . Faced with uncertainty and doubt , readers nonetheless must form an impression of the evidence and synthesize the state of knowledge in order to address the clinical or research question that stimulated their interest in the review . We argue that the reader is better served when the choices made in the review , regardless of whether they are strict or open , should be explicit , transparent , clearly stated and reproducible by interested readers . This list of objectives for review s is more easily satisfied by systematic review s , which use explicit methods to method ically search , critically appraise and synthesize the available literature on a specific issue . The question or issue need not be clinical : indeed , the concept evolved primarily in psychology studies ( Light and Pillemer , 1984 ) . The systematic review attempts to reduce review er bias through the use of objective , reproducible criteria to select relevant individual publications and assess their validity . A systematic review may include a meta- analysis or statistical summary of the individual study results : the aggregate of effects from several studies yields an average treatment effect that is more precise than the individual study results ( Schlesselman and Collins , 2003 ) . Thus , the systematic review involves explicit , transparent methods which are clearly stated , and reproducible by others . Whether a systematic review of r and omized controlled trials adheres to the guidelines can easily be evaluated by means of a widely used checklist ( the QUORUM statement ) ( Moher et al. , 1999 ) . The strengths of the systematic review include the narrow focus of the question , the comprehensive search for evidence , the criterion-based selection of relevant evidence , the rigorous appraisal of validity , the objective or quantitative summary , and the evidence -based inferences ( Cook et al. , 1997 ) . For some review topics , however , the strengths of the systematic review may turn into weaknesses . The primary problem is that the narrow focus and prescribed methods of the systematic review do not allow for comprehensive coverage . For example , the historical review is an irreplaceable means of tracing the development of a scientific principle or clinical concept , but the narrative thread could be lost in the strict rules of systematic review . As other examples , it would be burdensome to apply systematic methods to a survey on  aneuploidy and fertility in the aging female or to an assessment of mouse knockout models and polycystic ovarian phenotype . Such topics would require the wider scope of a traditional narrative review , in Human Reproduction Up date , Vol.11 , No.2 pp . 103–104 , 2005 doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh058 Advance Access publication December 23 , Systematic review s are increasingly used to answer clinical questions . Their popularity is partly attributable to their apparent clinical superiority in providing quick summaries of evidence from the ever-growing medical literature ( more than 750,000 items annually [ 1 ] ) , but also thanks to the great impact of the Cochrane Collaboration in promoting the use of the systematic review [ 2 ] . We also note that many scientific journals favour systematic review s because they tend to contribute to higher journal impact factors . However , the rise of systematic review s should give cause for concern ; more than 8000 are being indexed in MEDLINE annually , reflecting a three-fold increase over the last decade [ 3 ] . We write ‘ concern ’ , because many of these review s across healthcare seem to fall short of essential requirements such as incorporating risk of bias assessment in meta-analyses ( only 16 % ) , search ing for unpublished data ( only 7 % ) , or not fully following a protocol ( only one-third [ 3 ] ) . A recent study of review s published in anaesthetic journals revealed similar shortfalls [ 4 ] . Further more , the quality of reporting is lower in some countries and in journals with lower impact factors [ 5 , 6 ] . The apparent poor quality of many published systematic review s greatly increases the risk of misleading conclusions , which ultimately could harm our patients [ 7 ] . Despite their veneer of sophistication , one has to bear in mind that systematic review s are , in essence , retrospective appraisal s of the evidence . Editors , writers and readers should exercise great caution when interpreting conclusions of review s that only include very few trials , even when they fulfill the required st and ards [ 3 ] . Despite great efforts to promote adequate quality of review s through international guidelines such as PRISMA , GRADE and the Cochrane H and book [ 8 ] , the majority of review s may suffer from threats to the validity of their findings due to risk of systematic errors ( bias ) , design errors ( i.e. , erroneous selection of patients , doses of medication , comparators , analyses , outcomes ) and r and om error ( play of chance ) [ 9 ] . In a previous publication in this journal , some of the method ological issues and requirements for authors and editors were thoroughly discussed [ 10 ] . But we believe that other issues need to be addressed , in particular the amount of information included in meta-analyses from systematic review s , with the power this brings Objective To determine whether  fellowship training in critical care medicine with critical appraisal exercises improves the ability and confidence of fellows to evaluate the medical literature .  Design Prospect i ve , interventional pilot study . Setting Multidisciplinary critical care medicine training program at a large university hospital . InterventionFellows were given three didactic sessions covering study design , analysis , and critical appraisal techniques . During the course of the year , each fellow was required to review one article from the literature and present a critique of this article to the group and faculty ( Journal Club ) . Fellows were guided in the preparation of this presentation by one of the critical care medicine faculty . Finally , a written analysis and critique of the article was performed by each fellow . Measurements and Main Results A test was given to each fellow at the beginning and end of the academic year . This test consisted of two pairs of articles on therapy for acute lung injury . For the pretest , each fellow was assigned , at r and om , one pair of articles . Fellows were given 1 hr to review both articles and to fill out a six-point test to assess their ability and confidence to appraise each article . At the end of the year , each fellow was tested on the opposite pair , the tests were grade d in a blinded fashion and the results of each test were compared . Six fellows completed both pre- and posttests . These paired results were analyzed separately , whereas results for another six fellows were conducted as an unpaired analysis . Mean scores increased both for the paired analysis ( 4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 5.1 ± 0.5;p = .015 ) and for the unpaired analysis ( 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 5.0 ± 0.5;p = .012 ) . Self-reported confidence in critical appraisal also increased ( 2.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.7;p = .004 and 2.6 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.6;p < .001 , respectively ) . Conclusion Critical appraisal exercises used in the training of critical care medicine fellows appear to improve both ability and confidence to appraise relevant medical literature This overview of the role of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer is based on clinical trials conducted at The Princess Margaret Hospital and on a critical review of the literature . For recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma , no drug or combination has been found superior to methotrexate , which in large series gives transient responses in about 25 % of patients . Reports of higher rates of response have not correlated with increased survival , and response rates from many series have been inflated by the use of poor and variable criteria of response or by inappropriate exclusion of patients . Chemotherapy may lead to high rates of response when used initially as part of combined modality treatment with radiation and /or surgery , but longterm benefit has not yet been demonstrated . Chemotherapy should not be considered part of st and ard management for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer , and should be used as part of primary treatment for loco-regional disease only in the context of large , well design ed clinical trials INTRODUCTION Pelvic floor muscle exercise ( PFME ) is recommended as a first-line treatment for  urinary incontinence . However , a review of the literature suggests the effect of PFME on sexual function ( SF ) , particularly during pregnancy and the postpartum period , is understudied . AIM To assess the effect of PFME on SF during pregnancy and the postpartum period . METHODS The following data bases were search ed : CINAHL ( EBSCOhost ) , Health Collection ( Informit ) , PubMed ( National Center for Biotechnology Information ) , Embase ( Ovid ) , MEDLINE , Cochrane , Health Source , Scopus , Wiley , Health & Medical Complete ( ProQuest ) , Joanna Briggs Institute , and Google Scholar . Results from published r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) and non- RCTs from 2004 to January 2018 on pregnant and postnatal women were included . PEDro and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme scores were used to assess the quality of studies . Data were analysed using a qualitative approach . MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The primary outcome was the impact of antenatal or postnatal PFME on at least 1 SF variable , including desire , arousal , orgasm , pain , lubrication , and satisfaction . The secondary outcome was the impact of PFME on PFM strength . RESULTS We identified 10 studies with a total of 3607 participants . These included 4 RCTs , 1 quasi-experimental study , 3 interventional cohort studies , and 2 long-term follow up cohort studies . No studies examined the effect of PFME on SF during pregnancy . 7 studies reported that PFME alone improved sexual desire , arousal , orgasm , and satisfaction in the postpartum period . CONCLUSION The current data needs to be interpreted in the context of the studies ' risk of bias , small sample sizes , and varying outcome assessment tools . The majority of the included studies reported that postnatal PFME was effective in improving SF . However , there is a lack of studies describing the effect of PFME on SF during pregnancy , and only minimal data are available on the postpartum period . More RCTs are needed in this area . Sobhgol SS , Priddis H , Smith CA , et al. The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercise on Female Sexual Function During Pregnancy and Postpartum : A Systematic Review . Sex Med Rev 2019;7:13 - 28 Background Anticipation of an invasive procedure in hospital is likely to provoke feelings of anxiety and stress in patients . An unfamiliar environment , loss of control , perceived or actual physical risk , dependence on strangers and separation from friends and family are all factors that can contribute to the development of such feelings . Recently , there has been considerable interest in the anxiolytic potential of music listening in a variety of clinical setting s , yet thus far , little is known about the impact of music listening on the pre‐procedural patient population . A systematic review of all literature to date was indicated to improve underst and ing of outcomes and impact of music listening on pre‐procedural anxiety , thus helping nurses decide whether or not to incorporate music listening into practice and to highlight a need , or otherwise , for a related primary research agenda . Objective The objective of this review was to determine the best available evidence on the effectiveness of music listening in reducing adult hospital patients ' pre‐procedural state anxiety . Inclusion criteria Types of studies This review included r and omised controlled trials and quasi‐experimental research design s that examined the efficacy of music listening in reducing state anxiety among pre‐procedural hospital patients published between January 1985 and February 2006 . The search was limited to publications after 1985 to coincide with the increasing interest and use of complementary therapies within health care during the 1980s and 1990s . Types of participants Participants of interest to the review were adult day patients , ambulatory patients and in patients who were about to undergo any type of clinical procedure . Types of intervention The review focused on studies that investigated pre‐procedural music listening employed and prescribed as a potentially therapeutic activity . It excluded any other form of music therapy . Types of outcome measures The primary outcome measures examined were alterations in state anxiety and a variety of physiological variables such as blood pressure and respiration and heart rates . Search strategy A search for published and unpublished literature between January 1985 and February 2006 was conducted using all major electronic data bases . A three‐step search strategy was devised which consisted of using high‐precision MeSH terminology and keywords to ensure that all material relevant to the review was captured . Critical appraisal The method ological quality of included studies was assessed by two review ers , who appraised each study independently , using the st and ard Joanna Briggs Institute ( JBI ) critical appraisal tools . Data extraction and synthesis Data were extracted from the studies that were identified as meeting the criteria for method ological quality using a data ‐ extraction tool developed for the review . Studies were grouped by outcome measure and summarised using tabular and narrative formats . Results The review demonstrated that state anxiety is defined and measured using both psychological and physiological parameters . Music listening had a consistently positive and statistically significant effect on reducing psychological parameters of pre‐ procedural state anxiety . However , the results from the measurement of various pre‐ procedural physiological parameters failed to reveal any consistent positive changes in patients who had listened to music . This calls into question the adequacy of the theories in this area which link anxiety and the automated and central nervous systems and the effect that music listening may have on these processes and physiological responses . Conclusions / implication s for practice In order to reduce anxiety , it is likely that patients will benefit psychologically from having the opportunity to listen to music in the immediate pre‐procedural period . Patients do not appear to experience any alteration in physiological status as a result of listening to music . Further research is indicated in order to replicate existing studies , to strengthen the evidence to support such interventions and to establish intervention parameters . Further research is needed analysing the physiological mechanisms by which music listening is believed to reduce state anxiety and the contribution of the automated and other nervous systems to this reduction Background Most patients in the secondary care sector consulting for low back pain ( LBP ) seem to have a more or less constant course of pain during the ensuing year . Fewer patients with LBP in the primary care sector report continual pain over a one-year period . However , not much is known about the long-term course of LBP in the general population . A systematic critical literature review was undertaken in order to study the natural course of LBP over time in the general population . Methods A search of articles was performed in Pubmed , Cinahl and Psychinfo using the search terms ‘ epidemiology ’ ; ‘ low back pain ’ or ‘ back pain ’ ; ‘ prospect i ve study ’ or ‘ longitudinal study ’ ; ‘ follow-up ’ , ‘ natural course ’ , ‘ course ’ or ‘ natural history ’ ; ‘ general population ’ or ‘ working population ’ . Inclusion criteria were that one of the objectives was to study the course of (L)BP in the adult population , that the period of follow-up was at least 3 months , and that there were three points of observation or more . The review was undertaken by two independent review ers using three checklists relating to description of studies , quality and outcomes . The course of LBP was established in relation to those who , at baseline , were reported not to have LBP or to have LBP . Would this course be stable , fluctuating , worsening , or improving over time ? A synthesis of results in relation to common patterns was presented in a table and interpreted in a narrative form . Results Eight articles were included . Articles were different on time span , the number of surveys , and the definition of LBP . In six of the seven relevant studies , for those with no LBP at baseline , relatively substantial stable subgroups of people who continued to be LBP free were identified . In six of the seven relevant studies , definite stable subgroups of continued LBP were noted and improvement ( becoming pain free ) was never reported to be a common finding . Conclusion The status of LBP in individuals of the general population appears to be relatively stable over time , perhaps particularly so for those without LBP at baseline The rationale was to develop recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in breast , colorectal , esophageal , head and neck , lung , pancreatic , and thyroid cancer ; lymphoma , melanoma , and sarcoma ; and unknown primary tumor . Outcomes of interest included the use of 18F-FDG PET for diagnosing , staging , and detecting the recurrence or progression of cancer . Methods : A search was performed to identify all published r and omized controlled trials and systematic review s in the literature . An additional search was performed to identify relevant unpublished systematic review s. These publications comprised both retrospective and prospect i ve studies of varied method ologic quality . The anticipated consequences of false-positive and false-negative tests when evaluating clinical usefulness , and the impact of 18F-FDG PET on the management of cancer patients , were also review ed . Results and Conclusion : 18F-FDG PET should be used as an imaging tool additional to conventional radiologic methods such as CT or MRI ; any positive finding that could lead to a clinical ly significant change in patient management should be confirmed by subsequent histopathologic examination because of the risk of false-positive results . 18F-FDG PET should be used in the appropriate clinical setting for the diagnosis of head and neck , lung , or pancreatic cancer and for unknown primary tumor . PET is also indicated for staging of breast , colon , esophageal , head and neck , and lung cancer and of lymphoma and melanoma . In addition , 18F-FDG PET should be used to detect recurrence of breast , colorectal , head and neck , or thyroid cancer and of lymphoma Background The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is developing guidelines about how to prevent and manage food allergy . As part of the guidelines development process , a systematic review is planned to examine published research about the prevention of food allergy . This systematic review is one of seven inter-linked evidence syntheses that are being undertaken in order to provide a state-of-the-art synopsis of the current evidence base in relation to epidemiology , prevention , diagnosis and clinical management , and impact on quality of life , which will be used to inform clinical recommendations . The aim of this systematic review will be to assess the effectiveness of approaches for the primary prevention of food allergy . Methods Seven bibliographic data bases will be search ed from their inception to September 30 , 2012 for systematic review s , r and omized controlled trials , quasi-r and omized controlled trials , controlled clinical trials , controlled before- and -after studies , interrupted time series and cohort studies . Cohort studies will be included due to an inability to r and omize with interventions such as breastfeeding . Studies that focused on the development of either food sensitization ( a proxy measure ) or food allergy will also be eligible for inclusion . Studies will be critically appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program and Cochrane Risk of Bias tools , as appropriate . Discussion There is a lack of rigorous evidence to support recommendations about how to prevent the development of food allergy . It would appear that it is important to see the prevention of food allergy in the context of individual , family and wider factors that may influence its development . There is much left to learn about preventing food allergy , and this is a priority given the high societal and healthcare costs involved . This systematic review will help to further this learning Background Systematic review s ( SRs ) are expected to critically appraise included studies and privilege those at lowest risk of bias ( RoB ) in the synthesis . This study examines if and how critical appraisal s inform the synthesis and interpretation of evidence in SRs . Methods All SRs published in March – May 2012 in 14 high-ranked medical journals and a sample from the Cochrane library were systematic ally assessed by two review ers to determine if and how : critical appraisal was conducted ; RoB was summarised at study , domain and review levels ; and RoB appraisal s informed the synthesis process . Results Of the 59 SRs studied , all except six ( 90 % ) conducted a critical appraisal of the included studies , with most using or adapting existing tools . Almost half of the SRs reported critical appraisal in a manner that did not allow readers to determine which studies included in a review were most robust . RoB assessment s were not incorporated into synthesis in one-third ( 20 ) of the SRs , with their consideration more likely when review s focused on r and omised controlled trials . Common methods for incorporating critical appraisal s into the synthesis process were sensitivity analysis , narrative discussion and exclusion of studies at high RoB. Nearly half of the review s which investigated multiple outcomes and carried out study -level RoB summaries did not consider the potential for RoB to vary across outcomes . Conclusions The conclusions of the SRs , published in major journals , are frequently uninformed by the critical appraisal process , even when conducted . This may be particularly problematic for SRs of public health topics that often draw on diverse study design OBJECTIVE To provide a review of the literature and rate the quality of published studies regarding chiropractic care , including spinal manipulation , for asthmatic patients . METHODS A multimodal search strategy was conducted , including multiple data base search es , along with reference and journal h and - search ing . Studies were limited to those published in English and in peer- review ed journals or conference proceedings between January 1980 and March 2009 . All study design s were considered except personal narratives or review s. Retrieved articles that met the inclusion criteria were rated for quality by using the Downs and Black checklist . A brief summary was also written for each retrieved study . RESULTS Eight articles met the inclusion criteria of this review in the form of one case series , one case study , one survey , two r and omized controlled trials ( RCTs ) , one r and omized patient and observer blinded cross-over trial , one single blind cross study design , and one self-reported impairment question naire . Their quality scores ranged from 5 to 22 out of 27 . CONCLUSION Results of the eight retrieved studies indicated that chiropractic care showed improvements in subjective measures and , to a lesser degree objective measures , none of which were statistically significant . It is evident that some asthmatic patients may benefit from this treatment approach ; however , at this time , the evidence suggests chiropractic care should be used as an adjunct , not a replacement , to traditional medical therapy Systematic Review Series Series Editors : Cynthia Mulrow , MD , MSc Deborah Cook , MD , MSc The last article in this series outlined methods with which to search the literature for studies on the clinical question that generates a systematic review [ 1 ] . Herein , we discuss the subsequent steps of selecting and appraising  studies  for a review . Both of these steps involve important judgments that can influence the results of a review . In selecting studies , review ers judge the relevance of the studies to the review question . In appraising studies , review ers judge numerous features of design and analysis . Some of these judgments are easy to make ; others are more difficult and prone to error . To be confident in their decisions , review ers should use methods that are reliable ( the results do not change if the procedure is repeated ) , impartial ( not influenced by the study results ) , and explicit ( unambiguous ) [ 2 ] . These strategies for selection and appraisal are sensible , and they distinguish most systematic review s from most narrative review s. However , evidence to support the importance of some of the methods we suggest is either scant or conflicting ; readers are referred to the original research on these approaches for more details . Selecting Studies for Systematic Review s If review ers perform a comprehensive search of the literature using the methods described previously in this series [ 1 ] , they will probably have assembled a large sample of articles . This sample will include most ( ideally , all ) studies that are relevant to the review question ( that is , the sensitivity of the search will be high ) . Inevitably , because such a wide net is cast , articles not pertinent to the clinical question will be retrieved ( that is , the specificity of the search will be modest ) . Thus , the review ers ' next task is to sort through all of the potentially relevant articles and select those that will be included in the review . To do so , review ers adopt several of the tactics listed in Table 1 and Table 2 for planning and executing the selection process ( in effect , improving the specificity of the search ) ; these tactics are described below . Table 1 . Planning Study Selection Table 2 . Strategies for Selecting and Appraising Studies Begin with a Well-Built Clinical Question Review ers should ensure that the question for review includes the four elements of a well-built clinical question [ 3 , 4 ] : the patients of interest , the main interventions under investigation , the comparison interventions , and the clinical outcomes of interest . By including these four elements , review ers can better focus the selection process . Choose Selection Criteria That Fit the Clinical Question Consider a systematic review of the effectiveness of a drug treatment ( for example , a proton-pump inhibitor ) for patients with a particular disorder ( such as esophageal reflux ) . Review ers need to decide whether to include studies of patients with any symptoms of reflux , only those with classic symptoms , or only those in whom definitive diagnostic tests have confirmed the presence of reflux . In addition , review ers might choose to include studies of patients with different comorbid conditions ; patients from different demographic or geographic or cultural background s ; or patients from different health systems , such as inpatient or community population s. Similarly , review ers should use selection criteria that reflect the main and comparison interventions of interest . In our esophageal reflux example , review ers would need to decide whether to include studies of a particular drug or studies of all agents in that drug 's class and whether to include studies of any dose and regimen or only studies with a specific regimen . For the comparison interventions , the review ers would decide whether to include studies that compare the experimental drug with alternate treatments ( such as antacids or histamine-2-receptor antagonists ) , with placebo , or with both . For the clinical outcomes , review ers have analogous tasks of defining the outcomes and translating them into criteria . In our example , the review ers would start by listing each clinical outcome ( for example , whether the outcome was endoscopic or clinical and whether it focused on cure or persistence ) and then decide whether to include studies that reported any outcome or only those with certain clinical ly important outcomes ( such as improvement in symptoms at 1 year ) . After thoroughly considering each element of the review question , review ers compile a set of explicit selection criteria . When these criteria are not explicit , the results of the review are more prone to error [ 5 , 6 ] . Reporting the selection criteria used in a review is extremely important to readers because the criteria indicate the relevance of the review to the readers ' clinical practice . Specify the Types of Study Design To Be Included After creating selection criteria that appropriately reflect the review question , review ers should consider which study design s to include . Ideally , review ers choose study design s that are most likely to produce valid results . For example , to answer questions about therapy or harm , review ers may want to include r and omized trials [ 7 ] because they provide more accurate estimates of benefit or harm than do cohort studies , casecontrol studies , and case series [ 8 ] . In reality , however , r and omized trials may not be conducted to address questions of harm [ 9 ] . Therefore , review ers need to consider which study design s are likely to be available to answer their question ; this information may necessitate modification of originally conceptualized selection criteria to incorporate observational ( nonexperimental ) studies . Specify Criteria Related to Type and Form of Publication Review ers also need to consider issues related to type and form of publication . Ideally , all of the relevant studies would be published as peer- review ed journal articles . However , some completed studies may be published only as abstract s , in non-peer- review ed form , or not at all . Review ers decide whether to include these incompletely reported studies when planning their literature search . By including all articles in various stages of publication and subjecting them to rigorous critical appraisal , review ers minimize the threat of publication bias ( the preferential reporting of studies with positive results ) [ 10 - 12 ] , which could generate misleading review s. Other studies may be reported more than once . To avoid over-representing duplicate studies in the review , investigators should plan to look for and exclude duplicate publications [ 13 ] . Finally , because studies may be published in different language s and because excluding studies published in different language s may bias the results of review s [ 14 , 15 ] , articles should be included , as appropriate , regardless of the language of publication ( translating as necessary ) . Limited time and re sources , however , may preclude such an approach . Construct and Pretest Selection Forms After deciding on selection criteria , review ers can prepare customized forms that contain checklists of the selection criteria ( Figure 1 ) . Using these forms can simplify the selection process , increase reliability , and provide a record of the judgments made about each study . After drafting form prototypes , review ers pretest these forms for clarity , ease of application , and reliability . To pretest the forms , two or more independent review ers typically apply them to a r and om sample of studies identified by the literature search . Review ers compare their results to identify sources of ambiguity and then revise the forms accordingly . If the revisions are substantial , this process may need to be repeated before the forms can be used . Figure 1 . Example of a form that might be developed for the selection of studies for a systematic review evaluating the efficacy of -blockers for secondary prevention of variceal bleeding .  Write a Detailed Protocol Having a selection protocol as part of a larger protocol for the entire review helps review ers in two ways . First , it provides a document that explicitly states the review question and the selection criteria , making the process accountable . Review ers can later return to the protocol for guidance in resolving disagreements about article selection . Second , the selection protocol identifies what work will be done , by whom , in what manner , when , and for what reason ; thus , it provides a mode of communication within the review team . When review ers have a very large sample of studies from which to select , they can simplify this task by review ing all of the titles , then the abstract s , and then the full articles , excluding studies that do not meet one or more selection criteria at each step . In doing so , review ers should record ( on the selection forms ) the reasons for exclusion . After review ers have selected studies for the systematic review , they will move to the next task of critical appraisal . This procedure also requires careful planning . Appraising Studies for Systematic Review s Review ers appraise the studies selected for review with three objectives in mind : 1 ) to underst and the validity of the studies , 2 ) to uncover reasons for differences among study results other than chance , and 3 ) to provide readers with sufficient information with which to judge for themselves the applicability of the systematic review to their clinical practice . To achieve these goals , review ers use the strategies outlined in Table 2 and Table 3 to carefully reexamine many important features of the primary studies . Table 3 . Planning Study Appraisal Examine Important Clinical Features Although the selection criteria for a systematic review define the population , interventions , and outcomes of interest , the appraisal process involves a detailed assessment of the patients ( for example , high , medium , or low risk ) , the study interventions ( for example , frequency , degree , and duration ) , and the outcome measurements ( for example , definitions and degree of surveillance ) Background Osteoarthritis ( OA ) is a common cause of pain and disability , and is the most common form of arthritis in the Western world . The most common joint to be affected is the knee . Pain and functional disability are common symptoms , which can lead to reduced quality of life and increase the risk of further morbidity . Current treatment aims to educate patients about the management of OA , reduce pain , improve function , decrease disability and reduce the progression of the disease . Education with clients has been described as a set of planned educational activities design ed to improve patients ' health behaviours and /or health status . The purpose of self‐education is to maintain or improve health , or , in some cases , to slow deterioration by increasing participant 's perception of self efficacy defined as an ability to control or manage various aspects of OA . To date , there is no systematic review of the literature undertaken to identify the effectiveness of self‐management educational activities for osteoarthritis of the knee . Objective The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of  self‐management educational interventions on function and quality of life for adult subjects with OA of the knee . Search strategy A comprehensive search strategy was undertaken on data bases available from University of South Australia from their inception to January 2007 . Selection criteria R and omised controlled trials or clinical controlled trials were sought which evaluated any self management interventions for osteoarthritis knee . Critical appraisal of study quality was undertaken using Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal instruments . Data extraction was via the Joanna Briggs Institute st and ard data extraction form for evidence of effectiveness , and Review Manager Software was used to calculate comparative statistics . Results Thirteen trials were included in the review . Trials were clinical ly and method ologically heterogeneous . Pooled results indicate evidence of a beneficial effect from  self management strategies with reducing pain ( SMD ‐0.25 , 95%CI ‐0.36 to ‐0.13 , 11 trials 1379 participants ) . There was no effect on physical function ( SMD 0.13 , 95%CI ‐0.33 to ‐0.08 , eight trials , 1156 subjects ) . No beneficial effects were found from self management interventions with improving quality of life . We also found the exercise component of self management ( four trials ) demonstrated a benefit with reducing pain , improving function and quality of life . Exercise also offered a benefit over no exercise  . Overall method ological quality was moderate . Discussion Pooled results indicate evidence of a beneficial effect from self management strategies with reducing pain and improving function . Significant heterogeneity was found between trials . This was controlled for in the analysis but may be explained by heterogeneity in both the intervention and control group . The exercise component of self management programmes appears to contribute a significant benefit . Conclusion There is encouraging evidence of a small benefit from exercise in self management programs . Clear guidelines can not be provided for practice regarding the exercise content due to heterogeneity but overall benefit suggests this component should be emphasized and implemented in primary care self management programmes STUDY QUESTION Are there differences in the method ological quality of Cochrane systematic review s ( CRs ) and non-Cochrane systematic review s ( NCRs ) of assisted reproductive technologies ? SUMMARY ANSWER CRs on assisted reproduction are of higher method ological quality than similar review s published in other journals . WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The quality of systematic review s varies . STUDY DESIGN , SIZE AND DURATION This was a cross-sectional study of 30 CR and 30 NCR systematic review s that were r and omly selected from the eligible review s identified from a literature search for the years 2007 - 2011 . MATERIAL S , SETTING AND METHODS We extracted data on the reporting and method ological characteristics of the included systematic review s. We assessed the method ological quality of the review s using the 11-domain Measurement Tool to Assess the Method ological Quality of Systematic Review s ( AMSTAR ) tool and subsequently compared CR and NCR systematic review s. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The AMSTAR quality assessment found that CRs were superior to NCRs . For 10 of 11 AMSTAR domains , the requirements were met in > 50 % of CRs , but only 4 of 11 domains showed requirements being met in > 50 % of NCRs . The strengths of CRs are the a priori study design , comprehensive literature search , explicit lists of included and excluded studies and assessment s of internal validity . Significant failings in the CRs were found in duplicate study selection and data extraction ( 67 % meeting requirements ) , assessment for publication bias ( 53 % meeting requirements ) and reporting of conflicts of interest ( 47 % meeting requirements ) . NCRs were more likely to contain method ological weaknesses as the majority of the domains showed < 40 % of review s meeting requirements , e.g. a priori study design ( 17 % ) , duplicate study selection and data extraction ( 17 % ) , assessment of study quality ( 27 % ) , study quality in the formulation of conclusions ( 23 % ) and reporting of conflict of interests ( 10 % ) . LIMITATIONS , REASONS FOR CAUTION The AMSTAR assessment can only judge what is reported by authors . Although two of the five authors are involved in the production of CRs , the risk of bias was reduced by not involving these authors in the assessment of the systematic review quality . WIDER IMPLICATION S OF THE FINDINGS Not all systematic review s are equal . The reader needs to consider the quality of the systematic review when they consider the results and the conclusions of a systematic review . STUDY FUNDING /COMPETING INTEREST(S ) There are no conflicts with any commercial organization . Funding was provided for the students by the summer studentship programme of the Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences of the University of Auckl and In many areas of medicine the amount of published information is increasing at an exponential rate , making it difficult for the clinician to condense the data to a manageable amount of valuable and useful information . Systematic review s have been suggested as a remedy for this information overload . Such review s are regarded as the highest level of evidence . Certain statistical methods , e.g. , meta- analysis , have also been introduced for the calculation of a more comprehensive summation of the compiled results from studies with small sample sizes . These findings would then serve as an authoritarian guide for evidence -based practice . Endodontists have lately jumped on the b and wagon of systematic review s and meta-analyses , and papers on various topics are being published . Well done , such comprehensive information would be very useful and authoritative for the practitioner . Alarmingly , the quality of these recent publications is negatively correlated to the frequency . This can have serious consequences in the clinical arena if spurious information is given a seal of approval when communicated as facts in refereed journals . A systematic literature review is design ed to focus on a single question and to synthesize all high- quality research reports relevant to the question . In these studies , however , sources of bias are often not controlled . Therefore , even the best review and meta- analysis becomes useless if it is based on poorly design ed research . Furthermore , these review s are mostly based on published data which are too often biased toward studies that show significant differences in results and /or outcome . “ Uninteresting ” conclusions tend not to be published . Endodontic literature , thus far , is short on well design ed and executed r and omized clinical trials . Furthermore , clinical protocol s often have many important “ proprietary ” modifications that make comparison difficult . This makes it very hard to undertake a systematic review to answer a narrow question . Such GIGO ( garbage in , garbage out ) can easily lead to biased conclusions and reinforce already existing biased comclusions . An example of such bias can be illustrated by a meta- analysis recently published . The study focused on assessing if there were differences in outcome between 1 and 2 treatment visits when treating teeth with apical periodontitis . Relevant publications on this topic are rare , and with the narrow inclusion criteria only 3 investigations were available for the review . However , the only factors connecting these 3 studies was the words “ single ” and “ two visits ” in the title . Beyond that , the selected studies are too different and inadequate for the study . Only 1 study is somewhat demonstrably r and omized , and outcome assessment s are based on 3 vastly different criteria . Two of the studies use calcium hydroxide as intracanal dressing , whereas the third uses no intervisit medication . Complexity of initial pathology and healing time are also clearly factors of great importance but not controlled . In addition , sample sizes in the component studies as well as the final cohort are all too small for the conclusions that there was no significant difference between 1or 2-visit treatment protocol s. To undertake and publish a meta- analysis on such an incomplete sample is counterproductive . Although the publication noted its numerous limitations , it will still communicate erroneous conclusions with a poor scientific foundation to the less informed reader . There are other examples of recently published systematic review s that are very ambiguous and tend to communicate spurious facts . One of these studies looks at the effect of smear-layer removal on sealing ability of root canal obturation . The study is entirely limited to laboratory experiments , with the majority of evaluations using dye leakage which is generally considered to be unreliable . This is an example of review ers lacking content expertise . The authors draw the conclusion , using defective review material , that removal of smear layer enhances the seal of the root filling . We may generally believe that this is the truth Background This review aims to present a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colonic surgery and to provide grade d recommendations for items for an evidence d-based enhanced perioperative protocol . Methods Studies were selected with particular attention paid to meta-analyses , r and omised controlled trials and large prospect i ve cohorts . For each item of the perioperative treatment pathway , available English- language literature was examined , review ed and grade d. A consensus recommendation was reached after critical appraisal of the literature by the group . Results For most of the protocol items , recommendations are based on good- quality trials or meta-analyses of good- quality trials ( quality of evidence and recommendations according to the GRADE system ) . Conclusions Based on the evidence available for each item of the multimodal perioperative care pathway , the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ) Society , International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition ( IASMEN ) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism ( ESPEN ) present a comprehensive evidence -based consensus review of perioperative care for colonic surgery Abstract We report a systematic analysis of group change scores of subjects with chronic neck pain not due to whiplash and without headache or arm pain , in r and omized clinical trials of a single session of manual therapy . A comprehensive literature search of clinical trials of chronic neck pain treated with manual therapies up to December 2006 was conducted . Trials that scored above 60 % on the PEDro Scale were included . Change scores that scored above 60 % on the PEDro Scale were included . Change scores were analyzed for absolute , percentage change and e ect size ( ES ) whenever possible . Nine trials were identi ed : 6 for spinal manipulation , 4 for spinal mobilization or non-manipulative manual therapy ( 2 overlapping trials ) , and 1 trial using ischemic compression . No trials were identi ed for massage therapy or manual traction . Four manipulation trials ( Five groups ) reported mean immediate changes in 100-mm VAS of –18.94 ( 9.28 ) mm . ES for these changes ranged from .33 to 2.3 . Two mobilization trials reported immediate VAS changes of –11.5 and –4 mm ( ES of .36 and .22 , respectively ) ; one trial reported no difference in immediate pain scores versus sham mobilization . e ischemic compression study showed statistically signi ca nt immediate decreases in 100-mm pain VAS ( average = –14.6 mm ) . There is moderate-to-high quality evidence that immediate clinical ly important improvements are obtained from a single session of spinal manipulation . e evidence for mobilization is less substantial , with fewer studies reporting smaller immediate changes . ere is insu cient evidence for ischemic compression to draw conclusions . There is no evidence for a single session of massage or manual traction for chronic neck pain INTRODUCTION During the last 20 years a great number of studies have emphasized the potential role of psychological factors as relevant predictors for the first onset of back pain as well as for the development of chronic pain . The formulation of a biopsychosocial perspective of the etiology and chronicity of back pain was a natural consequence . Actual questions concern the relative impact of psychological risk factors in the process of chronicity of back pain compared to biomedical , social and occupational factors . METHODS Whereas several review articles regarding the role of psychological risk factors are available up to now , a recently published review conducted by Steven Linton was the first systematic analysis of well controlled prospect i ve studies published since 1967 . Using a grading system similar to that recommended for guidelines the author defined a level A evidence when at least two good- quality prospect i ve studies supported the prospect i ve power of a variable . Level B evidence had support from one prospect i ve study . Level C represented inconclusive data and level D indicated that no studies met the criteria . Based on a literature search of more than 900 studies , 37 good- quality prospect i ve studies were analysed in detail . RESULTS The results indicated level A evidence for the following interrelations : ( 1 ) Psychosocial variables , especially chronic distress in daily life , depression and work dissatisfaction were clearly associated with the onset of back and neck pain ( 2 ) . Psychological variables , especially chronic stress in daily life , work dissatisfaction , depression and pain-related cognitions and coping behaviour were clearly linked to the transition from acute to chronic pain and disability ( 3 ) . Psychological variables generally had more prospect i ve power than biomedical , social or objective occupational variables . Among the pain-related cognitions , catastrophizing and fear-avoidance-beliefs yielded the most empirical support . Among coping behaviour passive coping stretegies such as avoiding behaviour was most important . At least level B evidence has been shown for the counterpart of an extreme suppressive coping behaviour . Patients who tended to suppress or ignore pain in order to finish all activities they started , who were unable to integrate phases of passive relaxation into the daily routine displayed a high risk of chronicity of pain 6 months after an acute phase of pain . One international and two German good- quality prospect i ve studies have shown the predictive power of a maladaptive suppressive behaviour pattern . Based on the avoidance-endurance-model of pain chronification , both extreme and one-sided passive pain coping as well as one-sided suppressive coping modes were conceptualized as maladaptive due to the process of chronicity . We assume that extreme passive behaviour will lead to immobility and muscular atrophy . Neurophysiological processes of sensitization will further lead to the development of chronic pain . On the other h and , extreme suppressive behaviour will lead to an overuse of muscles and joints with a repetitive combination of muscular hyperactivity and pain . These repetitive pain experiences will also elicit neurophysiological processes of sensitization . ( 4 ) Psychosocial variables displayed more predictive power than biomedical or biomechanical factors . ( 5 ) Psychosocial factors may be used as predictors of the risk for developing long-term pain and disability . Mixed empirical evidence has been shown for the role of personality factors ( level C evidence ) and no support has been found for the idea of a " pain prone " personality disorder or for the role of sexual and physical abuse . DISCUSSION 20 years of research , several qualitative review s and a recently published systematic review of 37 good- quality prospect i ve studies regarding the role of psychological , biomedical , social and objective occupational factors in the process of chronicity of back pain revealed that psychological factors are significantly related to the onset of back pain as well as to the development of chronic pain . Furthermore , the psychological factors displayed more predictive power than biomedical or biomechanical variables . As a consequence for clinical practice , these psychological risk factors have to be considered as " yellow flags " if a back pain problem wo n't respond to medical treatment for more than four weeks . As a further consequence , special risk factor - based psychosocial interventions should be offered in addition to the medical treatment to patients with high psychological risk factors for the development of chronic pain . The efficacy of such an interdisciplinary care in the very early phases of back pain in order to prevent chronicity of pain and disability has been published recently by our group
Screening protocol s have high predictive values to detect cervical spine fracture in alert , low-risk patients seeking emergency care after blunt neck trauma .
Computerized tomography ( CT ) scans had better validity ( in adults and elderly ) than radiographs in assessing high-risk and /or multi-injured blunt trauma neck patients .
In the absence of serious pathology , clinical physical examinations are more predictive at excluding than confirming structural lesions causing neurologic compression .
One exception is the manual provocation test for cervical radiculopathy , which has high positive predictive value .
There was no evidence that specific MRI findings are associated with neck pain , cervicogenic headache , or whiplash exposure .
No evidence supports using cervical provocative discography , anesthetic facet , or medial branch blocks in evaluating neck pain .
Reliable and valid self-report question naires are useful in assessing pain , function , disability , and psychosocial status in individuals with neck pain .
CONCLUSION The scientific evidence supports screening protocol s in emergency care for low-risk patients ; and CT-scans for high-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck .
In nonemergency neck pain without radiculopathy , the validity of most commonly used objective tests is lacking .
OBJECTIVE To critically appraise and synthesize the literature on assessment of  neck pain .
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA The published literature on assessment of neck pain is large and of variable quality .
There have been no prior systematic review s of this literature .