Probiotics Feeding in Prevention of Urinary Tract Infection, Bacterial Sepsis and Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Infants Efficacy of Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei oral supplementation on necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Efficacy of Saccharomyces boulardii on necrotizing enterocolitis or sepsis in very low birth weight infants: a randomised controlled trial. Reduction in necrotizing enterocolitis and improved outcomes in preterm infants following routine supplementation with Lactobacillus GG in combination with bovine lactoferrin. Oral probiotics: Lactobacillus sporogenes for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low-birth weight infants: a randomized, controlled trial Double-blind, randomised clinical assay to evaluate the efficacy of probiotics in preterm newborns weighing less than 1500 g in the prevention of necrotising enterocolitis Efficacy of Probiotics Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Oral probiotics prevent necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates. Impact of oral probiotics on neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants The politics of probiotics: probiotics, necrotizing enterocolitis and the ethics of neonatal research Do oral probiotics affect growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in very low-birth-weight preterm infants? Effect of oral probiotics supplementation in the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis among very low birth weight preterm infants. Comparison between killed and living probiotic usage versus placebo for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis and sepsis in neonates. Probiotics and Prebiotics for the Prevention of Necrotizing Enterocolitis Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates at risk by oral administration of monomeric IgG.
Background : It has been suggested that probiotics can reduce the overgrowth of pathogens in the bowels of preterm infants and contribute to the reduction of the incidence of nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units ( NICUs ) . The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Lactobacillus GG supplementation in reducing the incidence of urinary tract infections ( UTIs ) , bacterial sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in preterm infants . Methods : A double-blind study was conducted in 12 Italian NICUs . Newborn infants with a gestational age <33 weeks or birthweight < 1,500 g were r and omized to receive st and ard milk feed supplemented with Lactobacillus GG ( Dicoflor ® , Dicofarm , Rome , Italy ) in a dose of 6 × 109 colony-forming units ( cfu ) once a day until discharge , starting with the first feed or placebo . Results : Five hundred eighty-five patients were studied . The probiotics group ( n = 295 ) and the placebo group ( n = 290 ) exhibited similar clinical characteristics . The duration  of Lactobacillus GG and placebo supplementation was 47.3 ± 26.0 and 48.2 ± 24.3 days , respectively . Although UTIs ( 3.4 vs. 5.8 % ) and NEC ( 1.4 vs. 2.7 % ) were found less frequently in the probiotic group compared to the control group , these differences were not significant . Bacterial sepsis was more frequent in the probiotics group ( 4.4 % , n = 11 ) than in the placebo group ( 3.8 % , n = 9 ) , but the difference was not significant . Conclusion : Seven days of Lactobacillus GG supplementation starting with the first feed is not effective in reducing the incidence of UTIs , NEC and sepsis in preterm infants . Further studies are required to confirm our results in lower birthweight population BACKGROUND Probiotics are used for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) because of their positive effects on intestinal motor function , modulation of inflammatory response , and mucosal barrier function . OBJECTIVE The objective was to assess whether the combined use of Lactobacillus casei and Bifidobacterium breve may prevent the occurrence of NEC stage ≥ 2 by the criteria of Bell in very-low-birth-weight preterm infants . DESIGN A double-blind , r and omized , controlled clinical trial was conducted in 231 preterm infants weighing from 750 to 1499 g at birth . The intervention group was composed of 119 infants who received human milk with probiotic supplementation ( B. breve and L. casei )  and a control group of 112 infants who received human milk containing no probiotics .  The primary outcome was the occurrence of NEC stage ≥ 2 as defined by Bell 's modified criteria . RESULTS Four confirmed cases of NEC stage ≥ 2 by Bell 's criteria occurred only in the control group . CONCLUSIONS Oral supplementation of B. breve and L. casei reduced the occurrence of NEC ( Bell 's stage ≥ 2 ) . It was considered that an improvement in intestinal motility might have contributed to this result . This trial was registered at www.is rct in.org as number 67165178 ( International St and ard R and omized Controlled Trial ) BACKGROUND Probiotics have strain specific effects and the effects of fungi in preventing diseases in preterm infants have been investigated poorly . Saccharomyces boulardii is a yeast which acts both as a probiotic and a polyamine producer . AIM The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of S. boulardii in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) or sepsis in very low birth weight infants . STUDY DESIGN AND SUBJECTS A prospect i ve , double blind , placebo controlled trial was conducted in preterm infants ( ≤ 32 GWs , ≤ 1500 g birth weight ) . They were r and omized either to receive feeding supplementation with S. boulardii 50 mg/kg every 12 h or placebo , starting with the first feed until discharged . OUTCOME MEASURES Necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) or sepsis and NEC or death . RESULTS Birth weight and gestational age of the study ( n = 104 ) and the control ( n = 104 ) groups were 1126 ± 232 vs 1162 ± 216 g and 28.8 ± 2.2 vs 28.7 ± 2.1 weeks , respectively . Neither the incidence of stage ≥ 2 NEC or death nor stage ≥ 2 NEC or late onset culture proven sepsis was significantly lower in the study group when compared with the control group ( 9.6 % vs 7.7 % , p = 0.62 ; 28.8 % vs 23 % , p = 0.34 ) . Time to reach 100 mL/kg/day of enteral feeding ( 11.9 ± 7 vs 12.6 ± 7 days , p = 0.37 ) was not different between the groups . CONCLUSIONS Saccharomyces boulardii did not decrease the incidence of NEC or sepsis BACKGROUND Preterm infants remain at high risk of adverse outcomes following necrotizing enterocolitis  ( NEC ) and late onset sepsis ( LOS ) . Meta- analysis of r and omized trials has indicated a reduction in severe NEC following use of probiotics and bovine lactoferrin ( LF ) . Overall , however , uncertainty remains over which probiotic , or combination to use . The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of severe NEC and LOS before and after routine supplementation with Lactobacillus GG ( LGG ) and LF . METHODS In this retrospective cohort study , infants < 32 weeks or < 1500 g routinely received LGG and 100 mg lactoferrin daily from 2011 -2015 were compared with similar infants born from 2004 - 2008 . Cases of NEC were Bell stage 2 or greater and LOS was blood or spinal fluid culture positive after 48 hrs of age . RESULTS We noted a marked decline in the incidence of NEC from 3 % to 1 % with a RR of 0.29 ( CI 0.1 - 0.9 ) and a number needed to benefit of 50 . The cost of preventing one case of NEC was estimated to be NZ $ 2800 , considerably lower than the cost of treatment . LOS rates were not significantly different . There was a decrease in retinopathy treatment rates . During the period there was one case of LGG sepsis in a 23 week gestation infant with abdominal pathology and one infant developed NEC after stopping prophylaxis . CONCLUSION The rates of severe NEC was markedly reduced following prophylaxis . The case of LGG sepsis indicates caution is required in extremely preterm infants Background / Objective : The identification of probiotic species involved in gut homeostasis and their potential therapeutic benefits have led to an interest in their use for preventing necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) . Although bifidobacterium and lactobacilli sp. have been used to reduce the incidence of NEC in clinical trials . Lactobacillus sporogenes has not been used in the prevention of NEC in very low-birth weight infants yet . The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of orally administered L sporogenes in reducing the incidence and severity of NEC in very low-birth weight ( VLBW ) infants . Subjects/ Methods : A prospect i ve , blinded , r and omized controlled trial was conducted in preterm infants with a gestational age of <33 weeks or birth weight of < 1500 g. VLBW infants who survived to start enteral feeding were r and omized into two groups The infants in the study group were given L. sporogenes with a dose of 350 000 000 c.f.u . added to breast milk or formula , once a day , starting with the first feed until discharged . The infants in the control group were fed without L. sporogenes supplementation . The primary outcome measurement was death or NEC ( Bell 's stage ⩾2 ) . Results : A total of 221 infants were studied : 110 in the study group and 111 in the control group . There was no significant difference in the incidence of death or NEC between the groups . Feeding intolerance was significantly lower in the probiotics group than in the control group ( 44.5 % ( n : 49 ) vs 63.1 % ( n : 70 ) , respectively ; P=0.006 ) . Conclusions : L. sporogenes supplementation at the dose of 350 000 000 c.f.u/day is not effective in reducing the incidence of death or NEC in VLBW infants , however , it could improve the feeding tolerance Background A r and omised , double-blind clinical trial was undertaken in order to assess the effectiveness of probiotics in the prevention of  necrotising enterocolitis ( NEC ) in newborns weighing < 1500 g. Methods We studied a group of 150 patients who were r and omised in two groups after parental consent was obtained , to receive either a daily feeding supplementation with a multispecies probiotic ( Lactobacillus acidophilus , Lactobacillus rhamnosus , Lactobacillus casei , Lactobacillus plantarum , Bifidobacteruim infantis , Streptococcus thermophillus ) 1 g per day plus their regular feedings or to receive their regular feedings with nothing added ( control group ) , over the period of January 2007 through June 2010 . Clinicians in care of the infants were blinded to the group assignment . Results The primary outcome was the development of NEC . Both groups were comparable , with no differences during hospitalisation , including the type of nutrition received . Blood cultures obtained from cases that developed sepsis did not reveal lactobacillus or Bifidobacteria growth . No differences were detected in terms of NEC risk reduction ( RR : 0.54 , 95 % CI 0.21 to 1.39 ) although we did observe a clear trend in the reduction of NEC frequency in the studied cases : 6 ( 8 % ) versus 12 ( 16 % ) in the control group . When the combined risk of NEC or death was calculated as a post hoc analysis , we found a significantly lower risk ( RR : 0.39 , 95 % CI 0.17 to 0.87 ) for the study group . Conclusions Probiotics may offer potential benefits for premature infants and are a promising strategy in the reduction of the risk of NEC in preterm newborns OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of orally administered probiotics in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in preterm very low birth weight ( VLBW ) infants . STUDY DESIGN Ar and omized double blind controlled trial . PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY The Paediatrics Department of Sylhet M.A.G. Osmani Medical College Hospital , Sylhet Bangladesh , from July 2012 to June 2015 . METHODOLOGY Preterm ( 28 - 33 weeks gestation ) VLBW ( birth weight 1000 - 1499 g ) neonates were enrolled . The study group was fed with probiotics once daily with breast milk from first feeding , and the control group with only breast milk without the addition of probiotics . Both the groups received other st and ard care . The primary outcome was the development of NEC ( stage II and III ) , categorized by modified Bell 's classification . RESULTS In 108 neonates , development of NEC was significantly lower in the study group than that of control group [ 1 ( 1.9 % ) vs. 6 ( 11.5 % ) ; p=0.044 ] . Age of achievement of full oral feeding was significantly earlier in the study group than that in the control group ( 14.88 ±3.15 and 18.80 ±4.32 days ; p < 0.001 ) . Duration of hospital stay was significantly short in the study group compared to the control group ( 15.82 ±2.94 days vs. 19.57 ±4.26 days ; p < 0.001 ) . CONCLUSION Probiotic supplementation reduces the frequency of necrotising enterocolitis in preterm neonates with very low birth weight . It is also associated with faster achievement of full oral feeding and short duration of hospital stay OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis that normalizing the intestinal flora by administration of prophylactic probiotics would provide a natural defense , thereby reducing both the incidence and severity of  necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in preterm neonates . STUDY DESIGN Neonates < or = 1500 g birth weight were r and omized to either receive a daily feeding supplementation with a probiotic mixture ( Bifidobacteria infantis , Streptococcus thermophilus , and Bifidobacteria bifidus ; Solgar , Israel ) of 10(9 ) colony forming units (CFU)/day or to not receive feed supplements .  NEC was grade d according to Bell 's criteria . RESULTS For 72 study and 73 control infants , respectively , birth weight ( 1152 + /- 262 g vs 1111 + /- 278 g ) , gestational age ( 30 + /- 3 weeks vs 29 + /- 4 weeks ) , and time to reach full feeds  ( 14.6 + /- 8.7 days vs 17.5 + /- 13.6 days ) were not different . The incidence of NEC was reduced in the study group ( 4 % vs 16.4 % ; P=.03 ) . NEC was less severe in the probiotic-supplemented infants ( Bell 's criteria 2.3 + /- 0.5 vs 1.3 + /- 0.5 ; P=.005 ) . Three of 15 babies who developed NEC died , and all NEC-related deaths occurred in control infants . CONCLUSION Probiotic supplementation reduced both the incidence and severity of NEC in our premature neonatal population Abstract Objective : The aim of the study was to evaluate the neurodevelopment outcomes of very low birth weight ( VLBW ) preterm infants supplemented with oral probiotics for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) . Methods : A prospect i ve follow-up study was performed in a cohort of VLBW preterm infants enrolled in a single center r and omized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of oral probiotics for the prevention of NEC . Cognitive and neuromotor developments were assessed by using the Bayley scales of infant development II . Sensory and neurological performance was evaluated by st and ard techniques . The primary outcome was neurodevelopmental impairment at 18–24 months ’ corrected age . Results : A total of 400 infants completed the trial protocol . Of the 370 infants eligible for follow-up , 249 infants ( 124 in the probiotics group and 125 in the control group ) were evaluated . There was no significant difference in any of the neurodevelopmental and sensory outcomes between the two groups . Conclusion : Oral probiotic given to VLBW infants to reduce the incidense and severity of NEC started with the first feed did not affect neuromotor , neurosensory and cognitive outcomes at 18–24 months ’ corrected age There have been over twenty prospect i ve , r and omized trials of the use of probiotics to prevent  necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in premature babies . A Cochrane meta- analysis of 16 of the studies ( 1 ) including 2842 preterm infants , reported that ‘ enteral probiotics supplementation significantly reduced the incidence of severe NEC ( stage II or more ) ( typical RR , 0.35 ; 95 % CI , 0.24–0.52 ) and mortality ( typical RR , 0.40 ; 95 % CI , 0.27–0.60 ) with no evidence of harm . They concluded , ‘ Enteral supplementation of probiotics prevents severe NEC and all-cause mortality in preterm infants ’ . In a sensitivity analysis , including only the 4 highest quality studies , the results and conclusions were unchanged . For neonates born at < 32 weeks of gestation , the number needed to treat in order to prevent one NEC or one death is twenty . The risks of probiotics are minimal . A more recently published systematic review included several additional r and omized controlled trials , mostly published in the Chinese literature , and analysed a total of 20 publications and over 3800 preterm infants ; it came to similar conclusions as the Cochrane meta- analysis ( 2 ) . Probiotics are used in many European units but only rarely in North-America . In spite of the evidence , this safe and effective treatment for one of the most serious complications of prematurity has never been studied in the United States and perhaps never will . Probiotics will probably never be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration ( FDA ) . Instead , they will remain in regulatory purgatory , neither approved nor unapproved , an evidence -based treatment that can not become the st and ard of care , a safe and effective treatment that is not on hospital formularies in the United States . Probiotics fall into a peculiar lacuna of the regulatory system . Most innovative treatments are either drugs or devices , and the regulatory pathways for evaluating and approving them are fairly well defined by federal law . The FDA has jurisdiction over both drugs and devices . Probiotics are neither drugs nor devices , and they are made by companies that generally market health products to the general public . In contrast , in Canada , probiotics are under the jurisdiction of the Natural Health Products Directorate ( NHPD ) which has rigorous requirements for quality control and detailed labelling . But the NHPD does not evaluate overtly medical cl aims made about a product . It has little experience dealing with either a product that could actually decrease major complications or save lives in a particularly fragile population where mortality is rather common . Probiotics are quite inexpensive to manufacture . People can even make them at home . They are in most yogurts . For pennies , some parents buy them for their preterm infants in health food stores . Some mothers have started adding probiotics to their breast milk . In these cases , the medical team can either be unaware a preterm infant is in fact receiving probiotics or tacitly not interfere with these parental initiatives . Given the low cost of probiotics and Articles in the series A Different View are edited by William Meadow ( wlm1@uchicago.edu ) . We encourage you to offer your own different view either in response to A Different View you do not fully agree with , or on an unrelated topic . Send your article to Dr. Meadow ( wlm1@uchicago.edu ) OBJECTIVE To evaluate the growth and neurodevelopment outcomes of very low-birth-weight ( VLBW ) preterm infants supplemented with oral probiotics for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) . STUDY DESIGN This prospect i ve follow-up study was conducted in a cohort of VLBW preterm infants enrolled in a r and omized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of oral probiotics for the prevention of NEC . Growth outcomes included weight , length , and head circumference . Cognitive and neuromotor development were assessed by using the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II . Sensory and neurological performance was evaluated by st and ard techniques . The primary outcome was neurodevelopmental impairment at 18 to 22 months ' corrected age . RESULTS A total of 221 infants completed the trial protocol . Of the 208 infants eligible for follow-up , 174 infants ( 86 in the probiotics group and 88 in the control group ) were evaluated . There was no significant difference in growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes between the two groups . CONCLUSION Oral probiotic administered to VLBW infants to reduce the incidence and severity of NEC started with the first feed did not affect growth , neuromotor , neurosensory , and cognitive outcomes at 18 to 22 months ' corrected age BACKGROUND Necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) is the most serious gastrointestinal problem in very low birth weight preterm infants . Multiple risk factors activate the inflammatory cascade leading to high expressions of pro-inflammatory mediators causing bowel injury in NEC . The anti-inflammatory effect of probiotics is due to the inhibition and reduction of inflammatory signal in intestinal epithelium . OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of probiotics supplementation in the prevention of NEC among very low birth weight preterm infants . STUDY DESIGN A prospect i ve r and omized controlled trial . MATERIAL AND METHOD All preterm infants with gestational age less than or equal to 34 weeks and birth weight less than or equal to 1,500 grams admitted in neonatal care unit , Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health during June 1st , 2012 and January 31th , 2013 were enrolled in this study . They were r and omized into two groups , study and control group . Infants in the study group were fed Infloran ( Lactobacillus acidophilus 1 x 10(9 ) and Bifidobacterium bifidum 1 x 10(9 ) organisms ) dose 125 mg/kg/dose twice a day with breast milk or premature formula from the start of feeding until 6 weeks or discharge . Infants in the control group were fed with either breast milk or premature formula alone . The primary outcome was NEC stage ≥ 2 . RESULTS Sixty infants completed the study , 31 infants in the study group and 29 infants in the control group . The baseline characteristic data of infants were similar except for more males in the present study group . Incidence of NEC stage ≥ 2 were similar in both the groups , 3.2 vs. 3.4 % ( p = 0.74 ) . There were no deaths during the study period . Days to reach full feeding , 150 ml/kg/day , were no differences between the two groups , 12.03 ± 5.49 days vs. 13.76 ± 8.25 days ( p = 0.31 ) . No adverse effects such as sepsis , flatulence or diarrhea were noted . CONCLUSION In this study , there was no difference in incidence of NEC stage ≥ 2 between the two groups . No adverse effects of probiotics supplementation were observed UNLABELLED The aim of the study is to compare the role of killed ( KP ) Lactobacillus acidophilus with living ( LP ) in reducing incidence of sepsis ( NS ) and necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) in neonates . R and omized double blind placebo study , included 150 neonates admitted to NICU at day 1 , sixty received oral ( LP ) and 60 received ( KP ) and 30 received placebo .  One gram of stools was collected on admission , at day 7 , at end of the study , as well as on suspected NEC or NS and was sent for culture . RESULTS LP and KP were preventive factors for NEC with absolute risk reduction ( AAR ) 16 , 15 % , respectively and 18 % for NS compared to placebo .  Incidence of NEC and NS did not differ significantly between neonates supplemented with LP and those with KP . Preterm neonates supplemented with KP showed significantly lower incidence of NEC compared to placebo , while incidence of NS showed no significant difference between both groups . There is significant reduction in NS and NEC among neonates with positive Lactobacillus colonization of gut compared to those none colonized at day 7 ( 27.9 vs. 85.9 % , 0 vs. 7.8 % ) and at day 14 ( 48.7 vs. 91.7 % for NS and 0 vs. 20.8 % for NEC ) . Overall comparison between the three groups showed statistical significant reduction in the incidence of NEC . Present conclusions are that early gut colonization with beneficial bacteria lowers the incidence of NEC and NS . KP retained similar benefits to live bacteria Necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in premature infants . Although the pathogenesis of NEC remains unclear , abnormal bacterial colonization has been postulated as playing a central role . Various factors impact bacterial colonization following delivery . Compared to term infants , the bacterial colonization pattern in prematurely born infants is markedly different , with a greater predilection for colonization with pathogenic bacteria . Probiotic and prebiotic administration offers the opportunity to manipulate the intestinal bacterial environment , favoring the growth of commensal bacteria . Experimental data from animal studies and data from human trials suggest that probiotics decrease the incidence of NEC . These preliminary studies support the need for a large , r and omized , controlled trial to further investigate the role of probiotics in the prevention of NEC Necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) represents one of the major causes of morbidity in low-birth-weight ( LBW ) preterm infants . This r and omized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of an oral immunoglobulin preparation ( containing monomeric IgG in a concentration of 90 % ) in reducing the incidence of NEC in infants of LBW for whom maternal breast milk was not available . One hundred and thirty-two formula-fed newborns with a birth weight less than or equal to 1,500 g or a gestational age less than or equal to 34 weeks were r and omly studied . Five hundred mg of IgG pro die , subdivided into 5 doses , were given orally to the test group of 65 neonates during the first 2 weeks of life . Although the number of infants included in this group is limited , the results of this study are encouraging : during the first 15 days after birth , none of the subjects developed NEC , while 4 cases were confirmed in the untreated control group . It , therefore , seems possible that oral monomeric IgG administration may prevent the development of NEC in LBW infants
There was no difference in mortality caused by NEC .
In premature newborns , the use of probiotics is effective as a prophylaxis for NEC and its complications
OBJECTIVE To eluci date the benefits of using probiotics in the prevention of  necrotizing enterocolitis ( NEC ) and its complications in preterm newborns .