Effect of cytotoxic drugs in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome with and without steroid dependence. Chlorambucil treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. A multicenter trial of mizoribine compared with placebo in children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Comparative trial of 2 weeks and 8 weeks cyclophosphamide in steroid-sensitive relapsing nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Controlled trial of azathioprine in treatment of steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Controlled trial of azathioprine in children with nephrotic syndrome. A report for the international study of kidney disease in children. Chlorambucil dosage in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome: a controlled clinical trial. Cyclosporin versus cyclophosphamide for patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing idiopathic nephrotic syndrome: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Prospective, controlled trial of cyclophosphamide therapy in children with nephrotic syndrome. Report of the International study of Kidney Disease in Children. Use of levamisole in maintaining remission in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children. Controlled trial of chlorambucil in frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome in children (a preliminary report). Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children. Experience with levamisole in frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Comparative study of prednisolone alone and prednisolone plus fusidic acid in the treatment of children with steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome. Therapeutic and toxic effects observed with different dosage programs of cyclophosphamide in treatment of steroid-responsive but frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. Pulse cyclophosphamide therapy in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Eight and 12 week courses of cyclophosphamide in nephrotic syndrome. A controlled prospective study of cyclophosphamide in relapsing, corticosteroid-responsive, minimal-lesion nephrotic syndrome in childhood.
In a prospective, controlled study, 50 children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome who had steroid toxicity were treated for eight weeks with either cyclophosphamide (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or chlorambucil (0.15 mg per kilogram per day), in combination with prednisone in tapering doses. Of the 34 children shows relapses had tended to occur after the prednisone dosage had been reduced or immediately after the drug was discontinued (the steroid-dependent group), 22 also had early relapses after cytotoxic-drug treatment. In contrast, cytotoxic drug treatment produced long-lasting remissions in 12 of the 16 children whose relapses usually occurred after prednisone treatment had been interrupted for more than 14 days (the non-steroid-dependent group). The difference in response between the two groups was highly significant (P less than 0.001). We conclude that patients with frequent relapses without steroid dependence can be treated successfully with an eight-week course of cytotoxic drugs, whereas those with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome do not profit from cytotoxic drugs in the low doses used. Chlorambucil, in combination with prednisone, was compared with prednisone alone in a randomized controlled trial in 21 children with either steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome to assess its effect on the duration of remission and the rate of relapse. All control patients treated with prednisone alone continued to relapse at the same rate, with all patients experiencing a return of proteinuria by seven months. Conversely, those who received the same prednisone therapy along with chlorambucil for six to 12 weeks remained in complete remission, without further medication, during 12 to 34 months of follow-up observation. Complications were minimal. Immediate side effects commonly reported with cyclophosphamide were not seen with chlorambucil. Comparison with published reports also suggests that remission induced by chlorambucil is more stable than that after cyclophosphamide. Chlorambucil appears to be of value in the frequently relapsing nephrotic patient, adding an effect that is unattainable with prednisone alone. The use of corticosteroids or cytotoxic/immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil, and cyclosporine for the treatment of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (FRNS) is limited because of their adverse effects. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mizoribine, a relatively new immunosuppressive drug developed in Japan, in children with FRNS.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was carried out in children, from 2 to 19 years old, with FRNS. At relapse, patients were treated with prednisolone. According to a dynamic allocation, mizoribine or a placebo was concurrently administered to each patient. Prednisolone was gradually tapered and discontinued within 12 weeks. The test drug was maintained for 48 weeks. The primary end point was the relapse rate (the total number of relapses/the total treatment days for all patients). Analyses were performed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
                The primary analysis was conducted on 99 mizoribine- and 98 placebo-treated patients. The relapse rate was lower in the mizoribine group than in the placebo group (0.0055 vs. 0.0067; ratio 0.81, 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.05, P = 0.12). The hazard ratio of the cumulative remission rate between the two groups was 0.79 (95% CI, 0. 57 to 1.08). In the subgroups consisting of patients 10 years old or younger, the relapse rate ratio between the mizoribine subgroup (54 patients) and the placebo subgroup (57 patients) was 0.66 (95% CI, 0. 44 to 0.94, P = 0.017). The hazard ratio of the cumulative remission rate between the two subgroups was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.85, P = 0. 007). Hyperuricemia was the most common adverse event with mizoribine (16%), but was transient.
                Compared with the placebo, mizoribine significantly decreased the relapse rate and prolonged the remission period in the subgroup consisting of patients 10 years old or younger. This drug may be useful in young children with FRNS who generally relapse more frequently than older children. nan A controlled trial of azathioprine treatment of steroid-responsive frequent-relapsing nephrotic syndrome of childhood failed to show a therapeutic effect on the stability of remission after withdrawal of corticosteroid treatment. nan A controlled clinical trial was performed using two dosage regimens of chlorambucil to treat children with frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. All children concurrently received prednisone (60 mg/m2 on alternate days). Ten children (Group I) were given chlorambucil as a stable dose (0.2 mg/kg/day) for 56 to 60 days, and 11 children (Group II) received increasing doses (0.2 to 0.63 mg/kg/day) for 42 to 77 days. Two children in each group subsequently relapsed. Follow-up averaged 28.6 and 27.2 months in Groups I and II, respectively. Three children in Group II developed infectious complications. The data indicate that a stable dosage regimen for chlorambucil is as effective as an increasing dose regimen in achieving long-term remission of frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome. To compare the efficacy (maintenance of remission), safety and tolerability of cyclosporin (CsA) with those of cyclophosphamide in patients with steroid-dependent or frequently relapsing nephrotic syndrome (NS).
                Open, prospective, randomized, multicentre, controlled study for parallel groups, stratified for adults and children. The setting was in nephrological departments in Italy.
                Seventy-three patients with steroid-sensitive idiopathic NS admitted to the study were randomly assigned to cyclophosphamide (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 8 weeks or CsA (5 mg/kg/day in adults, 6 mg/kg/day in children) for 9 months, tapered off by 25% every month until complete discontinuation at month 12. Seven patients lost to follow up were not considered in the analysis. The remaining 66 patients were followed up for 3-24 months after randomization.
                Relapse-free survival; number of N.S. relapses/patient/year; cumulative dose of prednisone/patient; laboratory investigations (kidney and liver functions, haematological parameters); incidence of adverse events.
                At month 9, 26 of 35 CsA-treated patients were still in complete remission and a further five patients were in partial remission; 18 of 28 cyclophosphamide-treated patients were in complete remission, and one in partial remission (P = NS). No difference between adults and children was seen with either treatment. The risk of relapse was similar between frequent relapsers (19 of 22) and steroid-dependent patients (8 of 14) given CsA, and those given cyclophosphamide (5 of 15 and 6 of 15). The mean number of relapses per year and the mean dose of prednisone per year were significantly less (P < 0.001) in both groups for the experimental year than for the year before randomization. At 2 years, 25% of the patients given CsA (50% adults and 20% children) and 63% of those given cyclophosphamide (40% adults and 68% children) had not had any relapse of NS. Tolerance to the two drugs was generally good. The CsA-related side-effects were mild and disappeared after drug discontinuation.
                This study shows that both treatments are effective and well tolerated; more patients given cyclophosphamide had stable remissions. nan A randomized, controlled trial was conducted in a pediatric unit in a teaching hospital in India to assess the efficacy of levamisole in maintaining remission in children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Sixty-one children with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome, who had achieved remission with corticosteroids, were allocated to a treatment group (33 patients) receiving levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/day) twice a week for 12 months or to a control group (28 patients) receiving no treatment. The main outcome measure was duration of remission. Thirty months later, in the levamisole group, 21 of 33 patients were in remission as against 12 of 28 patients in the control group (chi 2 = 2.54, p = 0.11, NS). The median duration of remission maintenance was 12 months in the levamisole group as compared with 10.5 months in the control group. On survival analysis, the difference in duration of remission maintenance between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.10), though there was a trend in favor of the treatment group. On stratified survival analysis, multiple relapsers in the levamisole group had longer remission maintenance than the control group though this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). The clinically significant trend towards increased duration of remission maintenance in steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome observed with levamisole therapy, especially in patients with multiple relapses, may require a larger study with a longer follow-up for definitive confirmation. nan Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients. This was a controlled prospective study on the use of an immunomodulator drug, levamisole, in the treatment of frequently relapsing, steroid-dependent (FR/SD) idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. The study was started on 1 January 2001 and completed on 31 December 2003. There were two groups: a treatment group who received levamisole (2.5 mg/kg) on alternate days for 1 year and a control group who received low-dose prednisolone only (<0.5 mg/kg) on alternate days for 1 year. There were a total of 56 patients (32 in the treatment group and 24 in the control group). The male to female ratio was 1.66:1 in both groups. The mean age upon initial diagnosis was 3.3 years in the levamisole group versus 4.3 years in the control group. The mean duration from diagnosis to the start of the second line treatment was 3.2 years in the levamisole group versus 2.8 years in the control group. The relapse rate and the total cumulative dose of prednisolone during the year prior to second line therapy was compared to that during the year following the institution of second line therapy in 56 patients. The mean relapse rate was reduced more significantly in the levamisole group. It was reduced by 0.29 versus 0.11 relapses/patient/month in the control group (P =0.0001). The mean cumulative dose of steroids was also reduced more significantly in the levamisole group. It was reduced by 293 versus 102 mg/m(2)/month in the control group (P <0.0001). Therapy failure was seen in 3/32 (9.4%) in the levamisole group versus 12/24 (50%) in the control group. Of the patients, 20/32 (62.5%) using levamisole were relapse-free in the follow-up year post therapy, while no patient was relapse-free in the control group over the same period. No major adverse effects of levamisole were seen. The cost of levamisole therapy was estimated to be US$ 25 per year for a 20-kg body weight child. Thus, we concluded that levamisole is a highly efficacious, safe and easily affordable initial therapy for FR/SD idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. There are several reports in the literature indicating that fusidic acid owns functions similar to those of cyclosporin. As cyclosporin has effectively been used in frequently relapsing steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome we carried out this study to determine whether fusidic acid used along with prednisolone diminishes rate of steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome relapses in children.
                The patients were randomly allocated to receive either prednisolone alone or prednisolone plus fusidic acid for two months in standard doses. In the cases of relapses the treatment was changed to the comparative treatment method. Altogether 18 children (12 boys and 6 girls) aged 1.3 to 13.2 years entered the study. Thirteen of them were treated by either method on different occasions, four patients were treated with prednisolone only, and one child was treated with prednisolone plus fusidic acid only. Thus, there were 17 evaluable treatment courses with prednisolone alone and 14 courses with prednisolone plus fusidic acid. The patients were followed-up as long as the remission lasted.
                There was prompt and complete response under the influence of both treatment methods. However, relapses occurred in all the patients irrespective of the mode of treatment. Mean duration of remissions did not differ significantly between the study groups (17.8+/-20.4 weeks in the prednisolone group and 18.3+/-23.9 weeks in the prednisolone plus fusidic acid group; p>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in laboratory parameters reflecting therapeutic efficacy in the comparative treatment groups, too.
                Thus, it was not revealed any remission-sustaining efficacy of fusidic acid used in standard doses for two months along with prednisolone in children with frequently relapsing steroid-responsive nephrotic syndrome. nan Intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVCP) has been shown to be effective in lupus nephritis. This is a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of IVCP with oral cyclophosphamide (OCP) in patients with steroid-dependent (SD) idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS). Forty-seven consecutive children who were SD were randomized to receive either OCP (2 mg/kg per dayx12 weeks) or IVCP (500 mg/m(2) per month IVx6 months) after achieving a steroid-induced remission. The response was evaluated in terms of remission, change in steroid response status, duration of remission (i.e., proteinuria-free days), side effects, and compliance. Of the 47, IVCP was given to 26 children and OCP to 21 children. The demographic data, histopathology, biochemical profile, and duration of follow-up in the two groups were similar. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the median proteinura-free time was 360+/-88 days compared with 96+/-88 days in the OCP group (values median+/-SE, log rank P=0.05). The actuarial cumulative sustained remission in our study was 73% in IVCP compared with 38.1% in OCP at 6 months after therapy, but was almost identical (18.6% in IVCP vs. 19%in OCP) after 2 years. Thus in our study the overall improvement in steroid response category from SD to sustained remission, infrequent relapser, and frequent relapser (88% in IVCP vs. 57% in OCP) was significantly better in the IVCP group, although the number of children with persistent remission tended to be similar at 2 years. Furthermore, the response was observed with a 40% lower cumulative dose than OCP. Hence, we conclude that IVCP is a safe and effective therapeutic modality in children with INS who are SD. Seventy-three children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome were randomly allocated to receive treatment with cyclophosphamide (2 mg/kg/day) for either eight or 12 weeks, in combination with prednisolone. All patients had previously relapsed while the dosage was being reduced or within 14 days of discontinuing prednisolone in the six months before receiving cyclophosphamide treatment (steroid dependent), and had severe steroid toxicity. Thirty two patients were treated with cyclophosphamide for eight weeks, and 41 for 12 weeks. There were no differences between the two groups in age at onset of nephrosis or entry into the study, sex ratio, duration of nephrosis, number of relapses before entry, and follow up period after entry. The relapse free rate of patients treated for eight weeks (25%) was similar to that of those treated for 12 weeks (24%) five years after stopping the treatment, and the mean relapse free interval and the sparing effect of cyclophosphamide (if any) on subsequent treatment with steroids did not differ between the groups. We conclude that cyclophosphamide should be used for no longer than eight weeks at a dose of 2 mg/kg/day in children with steroid dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome. nan
Eight week courses of cyclophosphamide or chlorambucil and prolonged courses of cyclosporin and levamisole reduce the risk of relapse in children with relapsing SSNS compared with corticosteroids alone. Clinically important differences in efficacy are possible and further comparative studies are still needed.