Effects of intravenous methylprednisolone on outcome in MRI-based prognostic subgroups in acute optic neuritis. Comparative evaluation of megadose methylprednisolone with dexamethasone for treatment of primary typical optic neuritis. A randomized, controlled trial of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis. Multicenter clinical trial for evaluating methylprednisolone pulse treatment of idiopathic optic neuritis in Japan. Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Multicenter Cooperative Research Group (ONMRG).
Treatment of acute optic neuritis with steroids has been shown to hasten visual recovery without affecting the final degree of recovery. However, MRI-clinical studies indicate that patients with long optic nerve lesions, particularly those that involve the nerve within the optic canal, may have a worse prognosis for recovery of vision. Partly because such lesions could lead to swelling and subsequent ischemic optic nerve damage, steroids could have a selective beneficial effect on this subgroup of patients. The present randomized trial was designed to test this possibility. Sixty-six patients with acute optic neuritis received IV saline or IV methylprednisolone. The clinical, psychophysical, electrophysiologic, and MRI outcomes were assessed after 6 months. Patients with short lesions presented earlier than those with long lesions (involving three or more 5-mm-thick slices of any part of the optic nerve, as well as its intracanalicular portion), and lesion length was significantly less in patients presenting within a week of onset of symptoms. Lesions also tended to lengthen during follow-up in individual patients. Treatment did not limit lesion length in either the long or short lesion subgroup and had no significant effect on final visual outcome. We conclude that steroids do not improve visual outcome or lesion length in patients with acute optic neuritis. To compare the efficacy of intravenous methylprednisolone and intravenous dexamethasone on visual recovery and evaluate their side-effects for the treatment of optic neuritis.
                Prospective, randomized case-controlled study including 21 patients of acute optic neuritis presenting within eight days of onset and with visual acuity less then 20/60 in the affected eye who were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received intravenous dexamethasone 200 mg once daily for three days and Group II received intravenous methylprednisolone 250 mg/six-hourly for three days followed by oral prednisolone for 11 days. Parameters tested were pupillary reactions, visual acuity, fundus findings, color vision, contrast sensitivity, Goldmann visual fields and biochemical investigations for all patients at presentation and follow-up.
                Both groups were age and sex-matched. LOGMAR visual acuity at presentation was 1.10 +/- 0.52 in Group I and 1.52 +/- 0.43 in Group II. On day 90 of steroid therapy, visual acuity improved to 0.28 +/- 0.33 in Group I and 0.36 +/- 0.41 in Group II ( P =0.59). At three months there was no statistically significant difference in the color vision, contrast sensitivity, stereoacuity, Goldman fields and the amplitude and latency of visually evoked response between the two groups. The concentration of vitamin C, glucose, sodium, potassium, urea and creatinine were within the reported normal limits.
                Intravenous dexamethasone is an effective treatment for optic neuritis. However, larger studies are required to establish it as a safe, inexpensive and effective modality for the treatment of optic neuritis. To assess the efficacy of oral high-dose methylprednisolone in acute optic neuritis (ON).
                It has been determined that oral high-dose methylprednisolone is efficacious in attacks of MS.
                A total of 60 patients with symptoms and signs of ON with a duration of less than 4 weeks and a visual acuity of 0.7 or less were randomized to treatment with placebo (n = 30) or oral methylprednisolone (n = 30; 500 mg daily for 5 days, with a 10-day tapering period). Visual function was measured and symptoms were scored on a visual analog scale (VAS) before treatment and after 1, 3, and 8 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were spatial vision and VAS scores the first 3 weeks (analysis of variance with baseline values as the covariate), and changes in spatial vision and VAS scores after 8 weeks. A significance level of p < 0.0125 was employed.
                The VAS score (p = 0.008) but not the spatial visual function (p = 0.03) differed in methylprednisolone- and placebo-treated patients during the first 3 weeks. After 8 weeks the improvement in VAS scores (p = 0.8) and spatial visual function (p = 0.5) was comparable with methylprednisolone- and placebo-treated patients. A post hoc subgroup analysis suggested that patients with more severe baseline visual deficit and patients treated early after onset of symptoms had a more pronounced response to treatment. The risk of a new demyelinating attack within 1 year was unaffected by treatment. No serious adverse events were seen.
                Oral high-dose methylprednisolone treatment improves recovery from ON at 1 and 3 weeks, but no effect could be demonstrated at 8 weeks or on subsequent attack frequency. A randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 1991 to compare an intravenous megadose of methylprednisolone with a control drug (mecobalamin) for treating acute idiopathic optic neuritis.
                Sixty-six cases from 22 clinical centers throughout Japan were examined to evaluate the treatment on visual function parameters, such as visual acuity, visual field, color vision, contrast sensitivity, and critical flicker frequency.
                The methylprednisolone pulse treatment group showed faster recovery of visual function, particularly the visual acuity at 1 week (P<.05), Humphrey field analyzer mean deviation at 3 weeks (P<.05), and color vision at 1 week (P<.05). Recovery of contrast sensitivity at several different spatial frequencies was significant in the pulse treatment group at 1 (P<.01), 2 (P<.05), and 4 weeks (P<.05) after the start of treatment. Visual function test results at 12 weeks and 1 year were essentially the same in the two treatment groups. Side effects appeared more frequently in the pulse treatment group than in the control (P<.05).
                Pulse treatment does not appear effective for idiopathic optic neuritis even though visual function in the pulse treatment group of this trial recovered more quickly during the initial phase compared to the controls. More effective and specific treatment should be established for optic neuritis.
There is no conclusive evidence of benefit in terms of recovery to normal visual acuity, visual field or contrast sensitivity with either intravenous or oral corticosteroids at the doses evaluated in trials included in this review.