A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of primary wound closure after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgical treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano: a prospective randomised study. A study of fecal incontinence in patients with chronic anal fissure: prospective, randomized, controlled trial of the extent of internal anal sphincter division during lateral sphincterotomy. A randomized controlled trial to compare anal dilatation with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for anal fissure. A comparison between the results of fissurectomy and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the surgical management of chronic anal fissure. Comparison of controlled-intermittent anal dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a prospective, randomized study. Adequate internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: subcutaneous or open technique? Anal sphincter function after treatment of fissure-in-ano by lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy versus anal dilatation. A randomized study. [Prospective randomized trial of optimum anal canal release treatment for chronic anal fissure]. Evaluation of healing and complications after lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: marginal suture of incision vs. open left incision: prospective, randomized, controlled study. Lateral sphincterotomy compared with anal advancement flap for chronic anal fissure. Clinical, manometric, and ultrasonographic results of pneumatic balloon dilatation vs. lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Chronic fissure-in-ano: a randomized study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy. Unilateral versus bilateral lateral internal sphincterotomy: a randomized controlled trial for chronic fissure in ano. Manual dilatation of the anus vs. lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic fissure-in-ano. Results of a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps increases patient satisfaction after anal fissure surgery. Open versus closed lateral sphincterotomy performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia for chronic anal fissure: prospective randomized study of clinical and manometric longterm results. A prospective randomized trial betwen subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy with radiofrequency bistoury and conventional parks' operation in the treatment of anal fissures. Fine-tuning of the extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: spasm-controlled vs. up to the fissure apex. Extent of lateral internal sphincterotomy: up to the dentate line or up to the fissure apex? Open vs. closed lateral internal sphincterotomy for idiopathic fissure-in-ano: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Much of the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) complications is related to LIS incision. In this study, incisions sutured primarily or left to secondary healing after open LIS procedure are compared regarding the wound healing and complications associated with wounds.
                Planning a prospective, randomized clinical study, 39 patients were separated into two groups. Open LIS was performed on both of the groups. While the incisions of the patients in group 1 (n = 22) were closed with two interrupted sutures using 3-0 chromic catgut, the incisions of the patients in group 2 (n = 17) were left open. The patients were followed up for 90 days postoperatively.
                Hematoma in 1 (4.5%), ecchymosis in 7 (31.8%), and wound infection in 1 (4.5%) developed in patients of group 1. In this group no significant external bleeding was seen. Wound healing duration was 15.05 +/- 5.60 days. In group 2 no hematoma developed (P = 0.98), but 2 (11.7%) ecchymoses (P = 0.25), 4 (23.5%), wound infections (P = 0.14), and 3 (17.6%) postoperative significant external bleedings (P = 0.07) were seen. Wound healing duration was 33.94 +/- 6.67 days (P <0.001).
                To achieve early wound healing, primary closure of open LIS incision is useful, but this technique has no significant effect on wound-related complications in comparison with secondary healing. A prospective randomised study compared anal dilatation (n = 37), posterior internal sphincterotomy (n = 21) and lateral sphincterotomy (n = 20) in the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissures in 78 consecutive patients. All the operations were performed under general anaesthesia using standard techniques. Anal dilatation relieved anal pain early (immediate relief in 57% of patients; the mean pain-days +/- SD of 3.2 +/- 5.4 days). Anal fissures after this operation healed in a mean time +/- SD of 20.3 +/- 12.5 days, coming in second place to lateral sphincterotomy. Anal dilatation was followed by insignificant wound infection but its main disadvantage was a high rate of post operative anal incontinence (in 24.3% of patients). Fissurectomy and posterior internal sphincterotomy was followed by the longest period of post operative anal pain (mean +/- SD of 32.4 +/- 10 days) as compared to the other two operations. It was the least favourable operation. Lateral sphincterotomy was followed by early relief of pain (immediate relief in 95% of patients). It was not followed by wound infection. It had the quickest healing time for the fissures (a mean +/- SD of 14.7 +/- 8.7 days). It was followed by anal incontinence in only one patient. In conclusion lateral sphincterotomy was the most favourable operation and it is perhaps the operation of choice to perform in patients with chronic anal fissures needing surgical treatment. Troublesome fecal incontinence following a lateral internal sphincterotomy is often attributed to faulty surgical technique. However, it may be associated with coexisting occult sphincter defects. Whether continence is related to the extent of sphincterotomy remains debatable. The aim of the study is to identify fecal incontinence related to chronic anal fissure before and after lateral internal sphincterotomy and its relationship to the extent of internal anal sphincter division.
                One hundred eight patients with chronic anal fissure were prospectively studied before and after lateral internal sphincterotomy. A questionnaire was completed for each patient before and after surgery with regard to any degree of fecal incontinence. Fecal incontinence severity index was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. The patients with preoperative perfect continence were randomized into two groups (46 patients in each group): Group 1 underwent traditional lateral internal sphincterotomy (up to the dentate line) and Group 2 were underwent a conservative internal anal sphincterotomy (up to the height of the fissure apex or just below it).
                Minor degrees of incontinence were present before surgery in 16 patients (14.8%). Results of the randomized trial revealed that temporary postoperative incontinence was newly developed in 6/92 of patients (6.52 %) who did not have it before surgery. Five of the six (10.86%) were in Group 1 one (2.17%) was in Group 2 (p = 0.039). Persistent incontinence occurred in two in Group 1 (4.35%). All of them were females. All have had a history of one or more vaginal deliveries.
                A mild degree of fecal incontinence may be associated with chronic anal fissure at presentation rather than as a result of internal sphincterotomy. Troublesome fecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy is uncommon. Sphincterotomy up to the dentate line provided faster pain relief and faster anal fissure healing, but it was associated with a significant postoperative alteration in fecal incontinence than was sphincterotomy up to the fissure apex. Care should be exercised in female patients with a history of previous obstetric trauma, as internal anal sphincter division may further compromise sphincter function. A prospective randomized trial has compared manual dilatation of the anus (MDA)during general anesthesia with lateral subcutaneous spincterotomy (LSS) during local anesthesia for the management of anal fissure in 156 patients. The two groups were similar with respect to age, sex and symptoms. There was no difference in the duration of time off work or early complications of treatment but, four months after operation, 93 per cent claimed to have been improved by MDA compared with 78 per cent after LSS (P less than 0.05). Recurrent fissure was recorded in 13 patients after LSS (29 per cent) compared with four (10 per cent) after MDA (P less than 0.02). There was a significant reduction in anal pressure at four months (P less than 0.02) after MDA, (123 +/- 31 to 97 +/-33) and LSS (127 +/- 36 to 104 +/- 32), but the anal pressure remained unchanged by operation in all patients where pressures were measured with recurrent fissure. These data indicate that MDA gives better results than LSS for treatment of anal fissure and that successful treatment is associated with a reduction in anal pressure. We compare lateral internal sphincterotomy as an effective treatment of chronic fissure in ano to fissurectomy, which is as an alternative surgical treatment.
                Sixty two consecutive patients were divided into two groups through sequential sampling. Thirty patients underwent fissurectomy and 32 underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. After a median follow-up of 22 months, we compared the results of the two procedures. In addition to frequent visits on a predetermined basis, a telephone inquiry into fissure recurrence and continence status was made.
                All patients in both groups were pain-free and without bleeding within 1 week. In both groups, urinary retention was noted in one patient. Incontinence to flatus was noted in the fissurectomy (F) group in two (6.2%) patients, but no incontinence was noted in the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) group. There was one patient (3.1%) with fissure recurrence in the F group but none in the LIS group. No patient in either group was afflicted with anal stenosis or perianal infections. All wounds healed within 8 weeks. Twenty nine patients (96.6%) in the LIS group and 28 (87.5%) in the F group reported satisfactory results with their procedure.
                In the surgical treatment of chronic anal fissure not responding to conservative management, LIS may be the better treatment and, perhaps, the preferable surgical technique with fewer total complications (P < 0.005). The results of controlled-intermittent anal dilatation (CIAD) or lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissures are presented.
                Forty patients who were randomized to two groups underwent CIAD or a LIS. The pre- and post-operative mean anal canal resting pressures (MACRPs) and symptoms were recorded and the results were compared.
                Two months post-operatively, 18 patients in the CIAD group and 17 patients in the LIS group had healed completely, and had no anal incontinence or other complications. The post-operative improvement in pain, bleeding, and constipation did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the CIAD and LIS groups, the pre-operative MACRPs were 89.7+/-16.5 and 87.6+/-12.3 mmHg, respectively; 2 months post-operatively, the MACRPs had significantly decreased to 76.9+/-13.7 and 78.1+/-11.3 mmHg in the CIAD and LIS groups, respectively. No statistical difference existed in the pre- or post-treatment MACRPs between the groups.
                CIAD applied with a standardized technique reduced anal canal resting pressure and provided symptomatic healing that was equivalent to a LIS. Since there were no findings of incontinence, or situations which resulted in sphincter damage, we conclude that CIAD is suitable for patients with chronic anal fissures because it is less invasive than LIS, with equivalent efficacy and safety. In addition, the CIAD method may be an alternative procedure in older and multiparous women who has a higher risk of incontinence. The extent of sphincter division by the subcutaneous or the open technique is examined by comparing the change in anal canal pressure after either method of sphincterotomy in twenty-eight patients with chronic anal fissure randomly allocated. In all patients the fissures healed at one month with significant reduction (P less than 0.01) of anal canal pressures to 52 (17-75) cmH2O after subcutaneous and 47.5 (35-100) cmH2O after open sphincterotomy, a 51 (22-77) and 50 (11-68) per cent reduction of their respective pre-operative measurements. Adequate sphincterotomy can be achieved by both techniques. Twenty patients with chronic anal fissure were randomized into two groups. Ten patients were treated with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy and 10 with anal dilatation. Anal dilatation was carried out preoperatively, and at 1 and 3 months after the operation in all patients. Preoperatively there was a significantly increased maximal resting pressure in the 20 fissure patients (80 mmHg median) compared with 20 control subjects (50 mmHg median). Postoperatively a significant decrease in pressure occurred in the dilated group (49 mmHg median p less than 0.05), whereas the pressure was not significantly reduced in the group that underwent sphincterotomy (65 mmHg median p less than 0.05). At 1 year three patients complained of recurrent symptoms of anal fissure in the dilated group compared with one in the sphincterotomy group. Minor continence disturbance was noted in two patients in both groups. nan Internal sphincterotomy remains the standard for treatment of anal fissure, but it is associated with risks of infection, bleeding, and incontinence. Recent studies have suggested that the complications after lateral internal sphincterotomy are related to surgical technique. This study was designed to assess the incidence of early and late complications after lateral internal sphincterotomy with marginal sutured incision. Fissure healing, pain, and complications were compared in patients undergoing a procedure involving three interrupted marginal sutures after open lateral internal sphincterotomy procedure.
                Ninety patients of chronic anal fissure were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups received open lateral internal sphincterotomy via standardized method. The incisions of the patients in Group 1 (n=45) were sutured marginally with three interrupted sutures using 2-0 chromic catgut, whereas the incisions of the patients in Group 2 (n=45) were left open. The patients were assessed at 12 weeks postoperatively by an independent observer.
                The fissure-healing rate was not significantly different in both groups (95 and 93.1 percent, respectively). The pain score was slightly higher in Group 2, and it was statistically significant. Four cases of bleeding and two abscesses were observed in Group 2. These complications were not observed in Group 1. One case of incontinence was observed at the beginning in Group 1 and four in Group 2, but the incontinence was transient in both cases.
                Marginal sutures of incision after lateral internal sphincterotomy may be beneficial to reduce complications related to early wound healing. This study was designed to assess differences between lateral internal anal sphincterotomy and anal advancement flap for chronic anal fissure.
                Forty patients with chronic anal fissure were prospectively studied. Patients randomized to the sphincterotomy group (n = 20; median age, 34 (range, 16-61) years) underwent lateral internal anal sphincterotomy. Patients randomized to the flap group (n = 20; median age, 32 (range, 20-44) years) had an anal advancement flap.
                All fissures in the sphincterotomy group healed following surgery compared with three patients that failed to heal in the flap group (P = 0.12). No patient in either group was incontinent to any degree following surgery. Patient satisfaction with surgery was similar in both groups.
                Anal advancement flap is an alternative to lateral sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial was designed to compare the clinical, functional, and morphologic results of pneumatic balloon dilatation with lateral internal sphincterotomy for the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
                All patients with symptomatic chronic anal fissure were randomly assigned to pneumatic balloon dilatation or lateral internal sphincterotomy and invited to complete a standardized questionnaire inquiring about their symptoms. Anal ultrasonography and anal manometry were performed before and six months after surgery. A proctologic examination was performed between the fifth and sixth postoperative weeks. Anal continence, scored by using a validated continence grading scale, was evaluated preoperatively at 1 and 6 weeks and at 12 and 24 months.
                Fifty-three patients, who satisfied selection criteria, were enrolled in the trial. Four patients (7.5 percent) were lost to follow-up. Twenty-four patients (11 males; mean age, 42 +/- 8.2 years) underwent pneumatic balloon dilatation and 25 patients (10 males; mean age, 44 +/- 7.3 years) underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. Fissure-healing rates were 83.3 percent in the pneumatic balloon dilatation and 92 percent in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group. Recurrent anal fissure was observed in one patient (4 percent) after lateral internal sphincterotomy. At anal manometry, mean resting pressure decrements obtained after pneumatic balloon dilatation and lateral internal sphincterotomy were 30.5 and 34.3 percent, respectively. After pneumatic balloon dilatation, anal ultrasonography did not show any significant sphincter damage. At 24-month follow-up, the incidence of incontinence, irrespective of severity, was 0 percent in the pneumatic balloon dilatation group and 16 percent in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group (P < 0.0001).
                As lateral internal sphincterotomy, pneumatic balloon dilatation grants a high anal fissure-healing rate but with a statistically significant reduction in postoperative anal incontinence. A prospective study comparing open and subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure was conducted. One hundred twelve patients were randomized to open (n = 54) or subcutaneous (n = 58) sphincterotomy. There was no significant difference in acute complications between the subcutaneous (8.6 percent) and open (7.4 percent) groups. Postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter for the subcutaneous group (1.7 +/- 0.2 days) than for the open group (2.3 +/- 0.1 days; P less than 0.001). Although the response rate to a pain questionnaire was less than 50 percent, the data suggest a lower level of postoperative pain in the subcutaneous group. Fissure healing was similar between the subcutaneous (96.6 percent) and open (94.4 percent) groups. We conclude that subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic fissure-in-ano is effective and may result in significantly less postoperative discomfort, shorter postoperative lengths of stay, and a comparable rate of complications compared with the open technique. Standard treatment for Chronic Anal Fissure (CAF) is unilateral Internal Sphincterotomy (UIS). Still there is recurrence and the risk of of incontinence. Bilateral Internal Sphincterotomy (BIS) as a treatment for CAF has not been adequately evaluated.
                A prospective randomized controlled trial of UIS at 3 o'clock compared with BIS at 3 and 9 'O' clocks. The outcome variables were: post operative pain, recurrence and incontinence.
                There was 104 and 107 cases in UIS and BIS group respectively with similar age and sex. There were 12 recurrences in UIS and only one in the BIS group (p < 0.001) with no change in the continence. BIS group had less pain (p < 0.001).
                BIS for CAF resulted in less postoperative pain, lower recurrence with no increase in the incontinence. However, further study is required with pre and post operative anal manometry. The results of a prospective randomized trial in 111 patients were recorded to compare manual dilatation of the anus with lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy performed under general anesthesia. There was no significant difference in the clinical results nor in the incidence of complications. Persistent or recurrent fissure occurred in three of 59 patients after manual dilatation of the anus and two of 39 patients after lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy, an incidence of 5.1 percent in each group. Only one patient developed serious impairment of continence, and this occurred following lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy (5.1 percent). Hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps are frequently found in association with chronic fissure in ano. Usually, no specific attention is given to them and they are considered normal findings. The present prospective study was aimed at determining whether removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps while dealing with chronic fissure in ano confers long-term benefit to patients.
                Between July 1999 and December 2000, 140 patients undergoing anal sphincterotomy were randomized into two groups to have their fibrous polyps and hypertrophied anal papillae either removed by radiofrequency surgery or left intact. After two years, they underwent a detailed interview by an independent, masked investigator.
                Overall 84% of patients who had polyp and papilla removal rated the outcome of their surgery as excellent or good in comparison to 58% of controls. The mean satisfaction grading was 9.2 on a visual analogue scale in the treatment group compared to 8.1 in controls (p=0.004).
                Removal of hypertrophied anal papillae and fibrous anal polyps should be an essential part of treatment of chronic fissure in ano. Persistence of these structures leaves behind a sense of incomplete treatment, reducing the overall satisfaction on the part of the patient. Radiofrequency procedure is useful in eradication of these concomitant pathologies. The aim of this prospective randomized trial was to compare the effectiveness and morbidity of open and closed sphincterotomy performed as an outpatient procedure under local anesthesia in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
                Eighty patients with chronic anal fissure were treated by open (group 1) or closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (group 2). Clinical and manometric results were recorded at the time of admission and at 1-week, 2-month, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year followup visits.
                Overall healing after 2 years was 92.5% in the open sphincterotomy group and 90% in the closed sphincterotomy group (p > 0.05). Fissures were notably less likely to heal in patients in whom the condition had been present for longer than 12 months and who had a sentinel pile before treatment. At the 2-year revision, incontinence was present in two patients (5%) in the open sphincterotomy group and one patient (2.5%) in the closed sphincterotomy group (p > 0.05). In all cases, the incontinence was mild (<4, Cleveland score). Increased mean resting pressure (113.9 mmHg) was found in patients with anal fissure before treatment compared with the healthy control group (mean resting pressure = 66 mmHg) (p < 0.001). The mean resting pressure in patients cured after 2 years was 75.65 mmHg, and in those with a recurrent fissure was 112.85 mmHg (p < 0.001).
                Morbidity and recurrence were similar in open and closed sphincterotomies when the procedures were performed under local anesthetic, and sphincterotomy under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure has several socioeconomic advantages (high degree of satisfaction and comfort to the patient, rapid solution of the problem, and no admission to the hospital or an operating room and no preoperative studies). Anal fissure is a frequent proctologic disease. There are many and various treatments adopted to cure this disease. In this study we applied radiofrequencies to the subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy and we compared the techniques in a randomised trial.
                Patients have been randomized in two groups: in group A 18 patients underwent subcutaneous lateral internal sphincterotomy using radiofrequency bistoury while in group B 17 patients underwent the conventional lateral internal sphincterotomy described by Parks.
                The mean values for operative time were 6.6 min for group A and 9.1 min for group B. According to pain score, patients' mean values were 1.8 for group A and 1.9 for group B. Healing of the wound was faster in group A than group B, while healing of the anal fissure was approximately the same.
                Lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy is the most advantageous operation for the treatment of the idiopathic anal fissure. The radiofrequency bistoury easies the procedure, lessens operating times and healing process of the surgical wounds. This study was designed to compare the results of controlled lateral internal sphincterotomy by using anal calibrators with those of sphincterotomy up to the fissure apex in a randomized, prospective fashion.
                In the fissure apex group, sphincterotomy was extended to the level of the fissure apex, and in the spasm-controlled group, serial small sphincterotomies and anal caliber measurements followed until an anal caliber of 30 mm was obtained.
                The preoperative anal caliber was 24 +/- 1.9 (range, 20-28) mm and 24.9 +/- 2.44 (range, 19-28) mm in the spasm-controlled and fissure apex groups, respectively (P = 0.127). Postoperatively, the spasm-controlled group had a mean anal caliber of 31.5 +/- 1.28 (range, 30-32) mm, and the fissure apex group had 32.5 +/- 2.33 (range, 25-37) mm (P = 0.035). In the fissure apex group, a significant negative correlation was determined between the postoperative anal caliber and time of relief of pain (r = -0.568, P = 0.001). The early (7 and 28 days) postoperative anal incontinence scores were significantly higher in the fissure apex group (P = 0.002, P < 0.0001, respectively). A significant positive correlation between the anal caliber measurements and anal incontinence scores at 28 days and 2 months also was noted in the fissure apex group (r = 0.406, P = 0.023; and r = 0.364, P = 0.044).
                Controlled sphincterotomy provided a faster relief of pain, and it was associated with a lower rate of early postoperative disturbance of continence and an insignificantly lower rate of treatment failure compared with sphincterotomy up to the fissure apex. The aim of this randomized, prospective study was to compare the results of lateral internal sphincterotomy up to the dentate line or up to the fissure apex in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.
                Adult patients with chronic anal fissure were randomly assigned to undergo lateral internal sphincterotomy to the level of the dentate line or to the level of the fissure apex. The patients were reexamined on postoperative Days 1, 7, 14, 28, and then at 2 and 12 months.
                The time required for relief of pain postoperatively was 2.08 +/- 1.44 days in the dentate line group, which was significantly shorter than that for the fissure apex group (4.72 +/- 4.86 days; P = 0.002). Objective healing was achieved in 23.7 percent and 17.6 percent at 14 days, 97.4 percent and 88.2 percent at 28 days, and 100 percent and 97.7 percent at 2 months in the dentate line and fissure apex groups, respectively (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). Only sphincterotomy up to the dentate line caused a significant change in anal incontinence (P = 0.016). Both groups had significantly lower anal resting pressures at 4 months postoperatively, compared with their corresponding preoperative levels (P = 0.005 and P = 0.007). The postoperative resting pressures did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.273). By 12 months postoperatively, no treatment failures or recurrences were noted in the dentate line group (100 percent healing rate). In the fissure apex group, there was one nonhealing case and four recurrences, resulting in a 13.2 percent rate of treatment failure (P = 0.058).
                Sphincterotomy up to the dentate line provided a faster and definitive healing within the time limits of this study, but it was associated with a significant alteration in anal continence. In turn, sphincterotomy up to the fissure apex was free of significant disturbance of continence, but its healing effect was slower and it was prone to an insignificantly higher rate of treatment failure. Internal sphincterotomy remains the "gold standard" for treatment of anal fissure but is associated with a risk of imperfect continence. Recent studies have suggested that surgical technique (open vs. closed) may influence incontinence rates after sphincterotomy. This study was designed to assess the short-term and long-term incidence of incontinence after open and closed internal sphincterotomy.
                Seventy-nine patients were randomly assigned to open or closed internal sphincterotomy, performed in standardized fashion by trainee staff. Standardized questionnaires assessing continence (modified Wexner score) were administered preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 52 weeks. Postoperative stay, pain scores, complications, and fissure healing were prospectively assessed by an independent observer.
                Three patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 36 closed (16 males; mean age, 45.1 years) and 40 open (21 males; mean age, 47.9 years) internal sphincterotomy patients for assessment. All operations were performed as day case procedures with no readmissions. At six weeks postoperative, 96 percent of fissures had healed. There were no significant differences in pain scores between closed and open internal sphincterotomy at Day 1 or Day 3 postoperative. New incontinence of any grade was seen in 6.8 percent of patients at 52-week follow-up. Three patients (4.1 percent, 1 closed, 2 open) suffered major incontinence at 52 weeks. There were no significant differences in continence at 1, 6, or 52 weeks, although more open patients experienced minor imperfections at 1 week.
                Incontinence after internal sphincterotomy is not insignificant. The technique (closed vs. open) does not seem to influence incontinence rates.
Manual anal stretch should probably be abandoned in the treatment of chronic anal fissure in adults. For those patients requiring surgery for anal fissure, open and closed partial lateral internal sphincterotomy appear to be equally efficacious. More data are needed to assess the effectiveness of posterior internal sphincterotomy, anterior levatorplasty, wound suture or papilla excision. Bilateral internal sphincterotomy shows promise, but needs further research into its efficacy.