Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol in adolescents with exercise-induced asthma using concurrent inhaled glucocorticoid treatment. Long-term circadian effects of salmeterol in asthmatic children treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma. Pilgrim's progress: the effect of salmeterol in older children with chronic severe asthma. The safety of twice-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in pediatric patients with persistent asthma. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone in the treatment of asthma. A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of anti-asthma treatment on lung function in children with asthma. Salmeterol xinafoate in children on high dose inhaled steroids. Efficacy and safety of a new pressurised metered-dose inhaler formulation of budesonide/formoterol in children with asthma: a superiority and therapeutic equivalence study. Budesonide/formoterol maintenance plus reliever therapy: a new strategy in pediatric asthma. Effect of formoterol on clinical parameters and lung functions in patients with bronchial asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Budesonide/formoterol improves lung function compared with budesonide alone in children with asthma.
The long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist salmeterol prevents exercise-induced asthma, but tolerance may develop to its bronchoprotective effect. We wanted to ascertain if the development of tolerance could be prevented by using a low-dose treatment regimen of 50 microg once daily, instead of the usual dose of 50 microg twice daily, in adolescents receiving regular glucocorticoid inhalations. Methods. In a randomized, double-blind, 2x28-day crossover study, we administered salmeterol (50 microg) or placebo once daily via a metered-dose inhaler and Nebulizer Chronolog device to monitor compliance. Exercise challenge tests were performed 1 and 9 hours after salmeterol or placebo inhalation on the 1st and 28th day of each treatment period. The primary outcome variable was the maximum decrease in percent predicted FEV1 postexercise.
                Fourteen subjects with a mean age of 13.1 years completed the study. The first dose of salmeterol had an excellent bronchoprotective effect against exercise-induced asthma at 1 and 9 hours. After the 28th consecutive daily dose of salmeterol, the bronchoprotective effect was significantly greater than that of placebo at 1 hour, but not at 9 hours.
                We conclude that a single 50-microg dose of salmeterol has an excellent protective effect against exercise-induced asthma for at least 9 hours, but that this effect may wane during regular once-daily salmeterol treatment, despite the reduced frequency of dosing and despite concomitant use of inhaled glucocorticoids. The present study was set up to investigate whether salmeterol in children with asthma already treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) leads to a sustained bronchodilator effect and decreased bronchial responsiveness, both during the day and night. Furthermore, we investigated whether cessation of salmeterol leads to a rebound increase in bronchial responsiveness. Forty children with asthma (aged 7-15 yrs) using ICS participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study. They received either twice daily 50 micrograms salmeterol or placebo. FEV1 and provocative concentration of methacholine that caused a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) were measured at 4:00 P.M. and 4:00 A.M. at baseline and after 16 wk. The same measurements were performed at 4:00 P.M. at 8 h after the first dose, and after 1 and 8 wk. After cessation of the study drug, FEV1 and PC20 were measured at 12 and 20 h and after 1 wk. Overall mean FEV1 from 1 to 16 wk of treatment was significantly higher in the salmeterol group than in the placebo group (difference, 4.9 +/- 2.0%, p = 0.01). Evolution in time of FEV1 did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.09). Overall mean PC20 from 1 to 16 wk of treatment was not significantly higher with salmeterol than with placebo (difference, 0.7 +/- 0.4 doubling dose [DD] p = 0.07); evolution in time of PC20 did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.58).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.
                Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Twenty-four children aged 12-17 years entered a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study investigating the use of salmeterol in chronic severe asthma. In addition to their usual medication, the children were given either placebo or 100 micrograms salmeterol b.d. by dry powder inhalation. Treatment was continued throughout one term at a residential school for asthma. Symptom scores, peak expiratory flow rates, spirometry and quality-of-life scores were compared between the two treatment groups. One child withdrew during the run-in period. Twelve pupils received placebo and 11 pupils received salmeterol. There were consistent improvements in favour of salmeterol, reaching statistical significance for morning and evening peak flow rates and spirometry when measured on four occasions during the study period. There were no medication-related adverse events recorded and no pulse rate changes. Salmeterol (100 micrograms b.d.) is well tolerated and efficacious in older children with chronic severe asthma. For children older than 5 years with asthma who remain symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, the preferred treatment is to add an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist vs increasing the ICS dose.
                To compare the safety of twice-daily treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate plus the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol with that of fluticasone propionate used alone in children aged 4 to 11 years with persistent asthma.
                A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study in 203 children with persistent asthma who were symptomatic during ICS therapy. Patients received fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (100/50 microg) or fluticasone propionate (100 microg) alone twice daily for 12 weeks.
                The safety profile of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol was similar to that of fluticasone propionate alone. The overall incidence of adverse events was 59% for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 57% for fluticasone propionate. Both treatments were well tolerated. Two patients receiving fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 5 receiving fluticasone propionate withdrew from the study because of worsening asthma. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and laboratory variables were infrequent and were similar between treatments. No patients had clinically significant abnormal electrocardiographic findings during treatment. Geometric mean 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment was comparable within and between groups; no patient in either group had abnormally low 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after 12 weeks of treatment. The incidence of withdrawals due to asthma exacerbations was 2% in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group and 5% in the fluticasone propionate group.
                In pediatric patients with persistent asthma, fluticasone propionate-salmeterol twice daily was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of fluticasone propionate used alone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy (expressed as effect on lung function) and tolerability of Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) in children with asthma. This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial. After a 2-4-week run-in period, 286 asthmatic children (177 boys, 109 girls; mean age, 11 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), 75% predicted normal), previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (average dose 548 microg/day), were randomized to 12 weeks' treatment with either budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 148), or an equivalent dose of budesonide 100 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 138). Efficacy variables included morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), spirometery, asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication (beta(2)-agonists). Serial FEV(1) assessments were carried out on a subgroup of children (budesonide/formoterol, n = 41; budesonide, n = 40) at randomization and at week 12. Relative to baseline, morning PEF (primary variable) increased to a significantly greater extent with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide alone (7.22% predicted normal vs 3.45% predicted normal; P < 0.001). Evening PEF also increased significantly with budesonide/formoterol (6.13% predicted normal vs. 2.73% predicted normal; P < 0.001), as did mean FEV(1) and serial FEV(1) measured over 12 hr (both P < 0.05). Similar improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use were observed in both groups. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of their adverse-event profile and rates of discontinuation. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler provided rapid improvements in PEF and FEV(1) compared to inhaled budesonide alone. These improvements were sustained throughout the study period. Budesonide/formoterol was well-tolerated in children with moderate persistent asthma.
                Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and especially spirometry measures are useful tools in evaluating early response to treatment of asthma in children mainly due to their worldwide availability. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of anti-asthma treatment in children, equally on FEV(1), FEF25-75%, R(int) and SR(aw) values.
                Children 6-18 years of age with moderate atopic asthma were randomized to 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 200 microg budesonide (B) (n=29), 5 or 10 mg (according to age) montelukast (M) (n=29), 200 microg B + 5 or 10 mg M (n=29), 200 microg B + 9 microg formoterol (F) (n=29) or placebo (n=27). FEV(1,) FEF25-75%, R(int), SR(aw) were measured before and after treatment.
                R(int), SR(aw), FEV(1) improved significantly in all active treatment groups while FEF25-75% improved significantly only in BM group and M group. Combination therapy, showed significantly greater effects on R(int) than monotherapy: BM group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.03) and BF group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.04).
                This study shows that using single parameter for monitoring asthma can be misleading. Using combination of lung function techniques provides better assessment of treatment. Results of our study confirm this hypothesis. The best effect on large and small airways was achieved with combined anti-inflammatory therapy. Current UK and international guidelines on asthma management recommend that, in pediatric patients still symptomatic on treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, consideration should be given to the introduction of regular twice daily long-acting beta 2-agonists.
                The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate 50 micrograms bid via the Diskhaler when added to the existing treatment of children with moderate to severe asthma.
                A 12-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted at 78 hospital centers throughout the United Kingdom, involving 210 asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 years of age. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF, night-time and daytime symptoms and relief medication usage were recorded daily by the patient or parent over a 12-week treatment period.
                Compared with placebo, the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to existing high dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment significantly improved mean morning PEF expressed as percent predicted (PEF-PP) during the first 4 weeks of treatment (median increase 6.5 percentage points P < .001). This effect persisted throughout the 12-week treatment period (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated an overall improvement in mean morning PEF-PP, 7.5 percentage points for salmeterol xinafoate and 4 percentage points for placebo. The mean evening PEF-PP followed a similar although less pronounced trend which was significant only during the first 4 weeks of treatment (P = .014). Daytime relief medication and recorded symptoms were reduced significantly in both groups. There was a greater improvement in the number of symptom-free days during the first 4 weeks (P < .01) and the last 4 weeks (P < .05) of treatment for salmeterol xinafoate. The overall incidence and nature of minor adverse events was similar in both groups.
                This study demonstrates that the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in symptomatic asthmatic children significantly improves morning PEF-PP, and reduces their symptoms and use of relief medication. This paediatric asthma study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel hydrofluoroalkane pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) formulation of budesonide/formoterol versus budesonide pMDI and budesonide/formoterol dry-powder inhaler (DPI).
                The study was a 12-week, multinational, double-blind trial involving children (aged 6-11 years) with symptomatic asthma on inhaled corticosteroids (375-1000 microg/day), with a history of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and peak expiratory flow (PEF) > or =50% of predicted. Patients were randomised (two inhalations twice daily) to budesonide pMDI 100 microg, budesonide/formoterol DPI 80/4.5 microg or budesonide/formoterol pMDI 80/4.5 microg. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in morning PEF.
                Overall, 622 patients were randomised. Increases in morning PEF with budesonide/formoterol pMDI and budesonide/formoterol DPI were therapeutically equivalent (29.5 versus 30.2l/min, respectively; 95% confidence interval: -6.0 to 4.6; P=0.78, also confirmed by per-protocol analysis). Improvements in secondary efficacy endpoints with both budesonide/formoterol formulations were not significantly different. Significantly greater improvement was achieved with budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus budesonide pMDI for morning PEF (+9.6l/min; P<0.001) and other lung function parameters. The safety profile of budesonide/formoterol pMDI was favourable and similar to that of budesonide/formoterol DPI and budesonide pMDI.
                Budesonide/formoterol, administered via the therapeutically equivalent hydrofluoroalkane pMDI or DPI, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for children with asthma. A fixed combination of long-acting beta(2)-agonists (LABA) plus inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has never been proven to reduce asthma exacerbations vs ICS alone in children. This 12-month, double-blind, randomized study in 341 children (age range, 4 to 11 years) with asthma uncontrolled on ICS investigated whether a novel regimen using budesonide/formoterol for maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort maintenance and relief therapy [SMART]) [Symbicort; AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden] could reduce exacerbations.
                Patients received SMART (budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg qd maintenance plus additional inhalations for symptom relief), budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg qd for maintenance (fixed combination), or higher-dose budesonide 320 microg qd (fixed-dose budesonide). Blinded as-needed medication (terbutaline 0.4 microg) was provided in both fixed-dose groups.
                SMART prolonged the time to first exacerbation vs fixed-dose budesonide (p = 0.02) and fixed-dose combination (p < 0.001). Rates of exacerbation requiring medical intervention were reduced by 70 to 79% with SMART vs fixed-dose budesonide and fixed-dose combination (0.08/patient vs 0.28/patient and 0.40/patient, respectively; both p < 0.001). Mild exacerbation days and awakenings were significantly lower with SMART; yearly growth improved by 1.0 cm vs fixed-dose budesonide (p < 0.01).
                The SMART regimen using budesonide/formoterol for both maintenance and as-needed symptom relief reduces the exacerbation rate compared with both fixed-dose combination and higher fixed-dose ICS alone in children with asthma. To determine the role of formoterol in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids.
                A randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to investigate the effects of inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice a day) in 32 children with moderate to severe bronchial asthma. The study consisted of two week run in periods and six week treatment periods, during both of which the patients continued their regular anti-inflammatory drugs. The efficacy parameters were symptom scores, bronchodilator use, daily peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), methacholine hyper-reactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), lung volumes, and airway conductance.
                Formoterol treatment for six weeks decreased symptom scores, PEFR variability, and the number of rescue salbutamol doses, and increased morning and evening PEFR significantly. No adverse reactions were seen.
                These findings suggest that inhaled formoterol is effective in controlling chronic asthma symptoms in children who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) with budesonide alone (Pulmicort) or budesonide (Pulmicort) and formoterol (Oxis) administered via separate inhalers in children with asthma. In a 12 wk, double-blind study, a total of 630 children with asthma (mean age 8 yr [4-11 yr]; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 92% predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid dose 454 microg/day) were randomized to: budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily); a corresponding dose of budesonide alone (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily); or a corresponding dose of budesonide (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily) and formoterol (4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily) (budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to treatment (average of the 12-wk treatment period) in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). Other changes in lung function and asthma symptoms were assessed, as was safety. Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved morning PEF, evening PEF and FEV(1) compared with budesonide (all p < 0.001); there was no significant difference between budesonide/formoterol and budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers for these variables. All other diary card variables improved from baseline in all treatment groups; there were no significant between-group differences. Adverse-event profiles were similar in all groups; there were no serious asthma-related adverse events in any treatment group. Conclusion: budesonide/formoterol significantly improved lung function in children (aged 4-11 yr) with asthma compared with budesonide alone. Budesonide/formoterol is a safe and effective treatment option for children with asthma.
In children with persistent asthma, the addition of LABA to ICS was not associated with a significant reduction in the rate of exacerbations requiring systemic steroids, but was superior for improving lung function compared to the same dose of ICS. Similarly, compared to a double dose ICS, the combination of LABA and ICS did not significantly increase the risk of exacerbations requiring oral steroids, but was associated with a significantly greater improvement in PEF and growth. The possibility of an increased risk of rescue oral steroids and hospital admission with LABA therapy needs to be further examined.