Prophylactic fluconazole in liver transplant recipients. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Comparative trial of oral clotrimazole and nystatin for oropharyngeal candidiasis prophylaxis in orthotopic liver transplant patients. Antifungal prophylaxis in liver transplant recipients: a randomized placebo-controlled study. Efficacy and safety of itraconazole prophylaxis for fungal infections after orthotopic liver transplantation: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Randomized trial of fluconazole versus nystatin for the prophylaxis of Candida infection following liver transplantation. Prophylaxis of oral candidiasis with clotrimazole troches. Prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) prevents fungal infections in liver transplant recipients: long-term results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. A comparative trial of clotrimazole troches and oral nystatin suspension in recipients of renal transplants. Use in prophylaxis of oropharyngeal candidiasis. Ketoconazole to reduce the need for cyclosporine after cardiac transplantation. Coadministration of ketoconazole to cyclosporin-treated kidney transplant recipients: a prospective randomized study. A preliminary report of diltiazem and ketoconazole. Their cyclosporine-sparing effect and impact on transplant outcome. Randomized controlled trial of oral itraconazole solution versus intravenous/oral fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections in liver transplant recipients.
Among persons who receive solid organ transplants, liver transplant recipients have the highest incidence of invasive fungal infection; however, no antifungal prophylaxis has been proven to be effective.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic fluconazole in liver transplant recipients.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                University-affiliated transplantation center.
                212 liver transplant recipients who received fluconazole (400 mg/d) or placebo until 10 weeks after transplantation.
                Fungal colonization, proven superficial or invasive fungal infection, drug-related side effects, and death.
                Fungal colonization increased in patients who received placebo (from 60% to 90%) but decreased in patients who received fluconazole (from 70% to 28%). Proven fungal infection occurred in 45 of 104 placebo recipients (43%) but in only 10 of 108 fluconazole recipients (9%) (P < 0.001). Fluconazole prevented both superficial infection (29 of 104 placebo recipients became infected [28%] compared with 4 of 108 fluconazole recipients [4%]; P < 0.001) and invasive infection (24 of 104 placebo recipients became infected [23%] compared with 6 of 108 fluconazole recipients [6%]; P < 0.001). Fluconazole prevented infection by most Candida species, except C. glabrata. However, infection and colonization by organisms intrinsically resistant to fluconazole did not seem to increase. Fluconazole was not associated with any hepatotoxicity. Patients receiving fluconazole had higher serum cyclosporine levels and more adverse neurologic events (headaches, tremors, or seizures in 13 fluconazole recipients compared with 3 placebo recipients; P = 0.01). Although the overall mortality rate was similar in both groups (12 of 108 [11%] in the fluconazole group compared with 15 of 104 [14%] in the placebo group; P > 0.2), fewer deaths related to invasive fungal infection were seen in the fluconazole group (2 of 108 patients [2%]) than in the placebo group (13 of 104 patients [13%]) (P = 0.003).
                Prophylactic fluconazole after liver transplantation decreases fungal colonization, prevents superficial and invasive fungal infections, and has no appreciable hepatotoxicity. Although fluconazole prophylaxis is associated with fewer deaths from fungal infection, it does not improve overall survival. Patients receiving prophylactic fluconazole require close monitoring of serum cyclosporine levels to avoid neurologic toxicity. A prospective randomized study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of clotrimazole troches and nystatin suspension to prevent oral candidiasis in immunosuppressed orthotopic liver transplant patients. Thirty-four patients received either clotrimazole troches, 10 mg, five times daily, or nystatin suspension, 500,000 units, four times daily. Prophylaxis was initiated after extubation after transplantation and continued throughout the hospitalization. One of 17 patients in each treatment group developed clinical and microscopic evidence of an oropharyngeal Candida infection. This gave an intragroup and an overall infection rate of 5.9%. It appears that either nystatin or clotrimazole may be used for candidiasis prophylaxis in orthotopic liver transplant patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two antifungal prophylaxis regimens in liver transplant recipients. One hundred and twenty-nine consecutive recipients were randomized to receive sequential treatment with intravenous liposomal amphotericin B + oral itraconazole, intravenous fluconazole + oral itraconazole, or intravenous and oral placebo. Frequency and incidence of mycotic colonization, local and systemic infection of mycotic origin, causes of death, and possible risk factors for mycotic infection were evaluated. The incidence of mycotic colonization was higher in the placebo group ( P<0.01), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection between the three groups. Pre-transplant colonization, severity of liver disease, and graft rejection were all risk factors for the development of fungal infection. The routine use of antifungal prophylaxis for all liver transplant recipients does not seem to be justified. There is significant morbidity and mortality related to fungal infections in the solid-organ transplant population.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, restricted sequential design trial was performed in 71 adults undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either itraconazole (5.0 mg/kg orally, preoperatively, 2.5 mg/kg orally, two times a day, postoperatively) or placebo. Therapy continued for a maximum of 56 days or until patient was discharged from hospital or met a predefined endpoint. Measurements included incidence of fungal colonization, superficial or systemic fungal infections requiring systemic therapy, adverse events, and mortality rate.
                This trial design supported the superiority of itraconazole in preventing fungal infections; nine patients in the placebo group (24%; 95% confidence interval, 0.118-0.412) and one patient in the itraconazole group (4%; 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.204) developed fungal endpoints requiring therapy with amphotericin B (P=0.04, Fisher's exact test). At the time of enrollment, fungal colonization occurred in 40% and 37% of itraconazole and placebo patients (P=0.43), respectively. Adverse events were reported by 97% and 100% of the intraconazole and placebo groups, respectively, and one itraconazole and six placebo-group patients died within the study period. There was no relation to trial medication for serious adverse events.
                Prophylaxis with itraconazole reduces fungal infections in patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation and is well tolerated. A prospective, randomized, multicenter study addressed the safety and efficacy of fluconazole therapy in 143 liver transplant patients. Seventy-six patients received daily oral fluconazole (100 mg), and 67 received nystatin (4 X 10(6) U) during the first 28 days after transplantation. Candida colonization occurred in 25% and 53% of patients in the fluconazole and nystatin groups, respectively (P = .04), and 13% and 34% of patients in the respective groups had Candida infections (P = .022). Of these patients, 10.5% in the fluconazole group and 25.3% in the nystatin group had superficial candidal infections (P = .024). Invasive candidiasis developed in 2 patients in the fluconazole group (2.6%) and 6 in the nystatin group (9.0%) (P = .12). There was no increased hepatotoxicity, cyclosporine interaction, or emergence of clinically relevant resistant Candida strains attributable to fluconazole. Thus, oral fluconazole (100 mg) is safe and reduces Candida colonization and infection after liver transplantation. Oropharyngeal candidiasis is frequently a complication of patients with altered immune states. Clotrimazole troches are effective in the treatment of Candida and were evaluated in this study in a prophylaxis regimen. Patients with malignant neoplasms who were receiving chemotherapy and renal transplant recipients who were receiving immunosuppressives were randomized to receive either clotrimazole (10 mg) or placebo troches three times a day in a prospective, double-blinded study. Eighty-four patients were randomized into the study, 18 patients with leukemia, 19 patients with malignant neoplasms, and 47 patients with renal transplants. Among all patients, thrush developed in 57% while receiving placebo compared with 13% while receiving clotrimazole prophylaxis. Prophylaxis showed significant benefit for the renal transplant recipients and for patients with solid malignant neoplasms, but not for the leukemic patients. Clotrimazole troches are effective in preventing oral candidiasis in a select group of patients. nan An open study designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of clotrimazole troches with nystatin oral suspension in the prevention of oropharyngeal candidiasis was conducted. This study was performed as the troche form of clotrimazole was easier to administer and less costly than nystatin oral suspension. Sixty assessable patients were randomized to receive either clotrimazole troches (n = 32) or nystatin oral suspension (n = 28) for a 60-day period after receiving a renal allograft. The two groups were comparable in age, sex, type of transplant, and amount of immunosuppression. Both regimens were 100% effective in preventing the development of thrush in the patients studied. Adverse effects were infrequently seen in either group (one case of mild nausea in the clotrimazole group and three cases in the nystatin group). One patient chose to withdraw from the clotrimazole group, and eight patients withdrew from the nystatin group before completing 60 days of therapy (P = .002). Reasons given for withdrawal were the unpleasant taste of the drugs, or an inability to comply with the protocol. The cost of clotrimazole troches in the prophylactic doses given in this study was approximately one tenth that of nystatin oral suspension. Clotrimazole troches are effective, less expensive, and easier to self-administer than nystatin oral suspension. Because ketoconazole can markedly reduce the need for cyclosporine and because it also has antimicrobial properties, it may offer benefits in the treatment of patients after cardiac transplantation.
                We randomly assigned 43 patients at the time of cardiac transplantation to receive ketoconazole (200 mg per day) (23 patients) or no ketoconazole (20 patients). The main end points were the dose of cyclosporine required and the incidence of cardiac rejection and infection.
                Ketoconazole reduced the dose of cyclosporine needed to maintain target levels by 62 percent at one week and by 80 percent at one year. The cost savings per patient (in U.S. dollars, inclusive of the cost of ketoconazole) was about $5,200 in the first year and about $3,920 in each subsequent year. The mean (+/- SD) rate of rejection in the first month was lower in the ketoconazole group than in the controls (4.2 +/- 0.8 vs 5.7 +/- 1.0 episodes per 100 patient-days, P < 0.001), and the average number of days to the first rejection was higher (30 +/- 29 vs. 15 +/- 8, P = 0.03). In the first year, 22 percent of the ketoconazole group required cytolytic therapy, as compared with 35 percent of the controls, and 9 percent of the ketoconazole group required total lymphoid irradiation, as compared with 15 percent of the controls (P = 0.07). The incidence of infection was lower in ketoconazole-treated patients than in controls in the second month (1.4 +/- 0.5 vs. 2.8 +/- 0.7 episodes per 100 patient-days, P < 0.001) and in the third month (0.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 2.3 +/- 0.6 episodes per 100 patient days, P < 0.001). Transient, asymptomatic cholestasis was observed in the ketoconazole group.
                After cardiac transplantation, ketoconazole greatly reduced the need for cyclosporine, resulting in substantial cost savings. Ketoconazole also reduced the rates of rejection and infection, without persistent toxic effects. We now use ketoconazole routinely in cardiac-transplant recipients. In this work, 100 living related donor kidney transplant recipients under cyclosporin (CsA) therapy were randomly distributed to two groups. Group 1 were administered ketoconazole, with group 2 serving as the control. Ketoconazole was given orally, 100 mg/day, while the dose of CsA was adjusted for a CsA whole blood trough level of 100-150 ng/ml. Patients and controls were assessed regularly in an outpatient clinic for 12 months and compared statistically for CsA dose, graft and liver functions, cholesterol, blood sugar, CsA nephrotoxicity, acute rejection episodes, chronic rejection and fungal skin infections. Statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in the CsA dose in the ketoconazole-treated group (73-76%), along with significantly lower alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, and serum creatinine values. CsA chronic nephrotoxicity and chronic rejections were also significantly lower in the ketoconazole-treated group, as was fungal skin infection (6.6 vs 63.2%). From this study, we conclude that addition of a low dose of ketoconazole to CsA-treated kidney transplant recipients not only saves costs, but may also have a favorable effect on graft function, chronic CsA nephrotoxicity, chronic rejection and fungal skin infection. A prospective randomized trial was conducted to compare the effect of diltiazem (DILT) with ketoconazole (KETO) on sparing of cyclosporine dose and renal transplant outcome. Renal allograft recipients 18 years old and older were eligible for the study. Triple immunosuppression (TRIPLE) including prednisone, azathioprine, and CsA was administered to all patients. The maintenance CsA dose varied by study group. Patients were randomized to receive one of three treatment strategies: group 1-TRIPLE (CsA 8 mg/kg/day); group 2--TRIPLE (CsA 6 mg/kg/day) + DILT (60 mg b.i.d.); group 3--TRIPLE (CsA 3 mg/kg/day) + KETO (200 mg/day). Modification of the DILT dose was allowed as needed to effect blood pressure control in group 2 patients. Mean 1-month CsA dose reductions were 30% and 60% of controls in group 2 and 3, respectively. A continued effect over time was observed in patients administered KETO but not DILT. At 1 year patients taking KETO required an average of 77% less CsA than the average dose necessary to effect similar parent CsA blood levels when no enzyme inhibitor was used. The use of KETO and DILT for 1 year allowed for 53% and 14% reductions in CsA cost, respectively. These savings include the cost of the KETO or DILT. Serum creatinines, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and incidence of liver function abnormalities were similar throughout treatment groups. The rate of rejection, time to rejection onset, and survival (GS/PS) were not different among the groups. Fungal infections were fewer in patients treated with KETO (12%) than in controls (16%) and patients randomized to DILT (19%). KETO failed to prevent Aspergillus infection in one individual. The investigation failed to identify any harmful result of treating renal allograft recipients with either DILT or KETO for the purpose of reducing CsA expense. Liver transplant recipients at high risk for serious fungal infections frequently receive fluconazole or an amphotericin B preparation for antifungal prophylaxis. Because of concerns about fungal resistance with fluconazole, safety with amphotericin B, and the cost of lipid formulations of amphotericin, alternative prophylactic regimens are needed. In this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of oral itraconazole solution with intravenous/oral fluconazole for prevention of fungal infections.
                Adult liver transplant recipients were randomized to receive either oral itraconazole solution (200 mg every 12 hr) or intravenous/oral fluconazole (400 mg every 24 hr). Each study drug was started immediately before transplant surgery and continued for 10 weeks after transplantation. Patients were evaluated for fungal colonization, proven invasive or superficial fungal infection, drug-related side effects, and death.
                Fungal colonization decreased from baseline to week 8 after transplantation in both the itraconazole patients (67% to 25%, P<0.001) and the fluconazole patients (77% to 30%, P<0.001). Proven fungal infection developed in 9 (9%) of 97 itraconazole patients and in 4 (4%) of 91 fluconazole patients (P =0.25). The number of proven invasive fungal infections (seven with itraconazole [7%], three with fluconazole [3%]) and proven superficial fungal infections (two with itraconazole [2%], one with fluconazole [1%]) were also similar in both groups of patients. Organisms causing infection were (four patients), (three patients), and species (two patients) in the itraconazole group and (two patients), (one patient), and species (one patient) in the fluconazole group. Mortality from fungal infection was very low and occurred in only 1 (0.5%) of 188 patients. Except for more frequent gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) with itraconazole, both itraconazole and fluconazole were well tolerated and not associated with any hepatotoxicity. Mean trough plasma concentrations of itraconazole were greater than 250 ng/mL throughout the study and were not affected by H -receptor antagonists or antacids.
                Oral itraconazole solution has adequate bioavailability in liver transplant recipients for effective antifungal prophylaxis. Similar to fluconazole, prophylactic oral itraconazole decreases fungal colonization and is associated with a low incidence of serious or fatal fungal infections. Except for gastrointestinal side effects, oral itraconazole solution is well tolerated and has no significant hepatotoxicity.
For liver transplant recipients, antifungal prophylaxis with fluconazole significantly reduces the incidence of IFIs with no definite mortality benefit. Given a 10% incidence of IFI, 14 liver transplant recipients would require fluconazole prophylaxis to prevent one infection. In transplant centres where the incidence of IFIs is high, or in situations where the individual risk is great, antifungal prophylaxis should be considered.