Effect of a nurse case manager on postdischarge follow-up. Evaluation of a hospital diabetes specialist nursing service: a randomized controlled trial. Effect of psychiatric liaison nurse specialist consultation on the care of medical-surgical patients with sitters. Effects of advanced nursing care on quality of life and cost outcomes of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Specialist nurse supported discharge in gynaecology: a randomised comparison and economic evaluation. A nurse rehabilitator's impact on patients with myocardial infarction. Team midwifery care in a tertiary level obstetric service: a randomized controlled trial. Evaluation of a MS specialist nurse programme. Using dietetic assistants to improve the outcome of hip fracture: a randomised controlled trial of nutritional support in an acute trauma ward. Incorporating nursing assistive personnel into a nursing professional practice model. An inpatient diabetes educator's impact on length of hospital stay. Nurses' well-being in a primary nursing care setting in The Netherlands. The effectiveness of primary nursing on burnout among psychiatric nurses in long-stay settings. Effect of a nurse team coordinator on outcomes for hospitalized medicine patients.
To examine whether use of a nurse case manager to coordinate postdischarge care would improve rates of follow-up, emergency department utilization, and unexpected readmission for general medicine patients.
                Prospective cohort trial.
                Publicly supported, tertiary-care teaching hospital.
                Four hundred seventy-eight patients admitted to the general medicine service.
                Use of a nurse case manager to provide discharge planning before hospital discharge and to arrange for postdischarge outpatient follow-up. Patients in the control group had discharge planning in the traditional ("usual care") manner.
                The proportion of patients with scheduled outpatient appointments in the medical clinic and the proportion making clinic visits, emergency department visits, or with readmission to the hospital within 30 days following discharge. A significantly greater proportion of patients assigned to the nurse case manager intervention had appointments scheduled at the time of hospital discharge (63% vs 46%, p < .001), and made scheduled visits in the outpatient clinic (32% vs 23%, p < .03). Intervention group patients were especially more likely than control group patients to have definite follow-up appointments if they were discharged on weekends. Intervention and control group patients did not differ, however, in the rates of emergency department utilization (p = .52) or unexpected readmissions within 30 days of discharge (p = .11).
                Use of a nurse case manager to coordinate outpatient follow-up prior to discharge improved the continuity of outpatient care for patients on a general medical service. The intervention had no effect on unexpected readmissions or emergency department utilization. To evaluate the effectiveness and cost implications of a hospital diabetes specialist nursing service.
                We conducted a prospective, open, randomized, controlled trial of standard in-patient care for adults with diabetes, with and without the intervention of a diabetes specialist nursing (DSN) service. The setting was a single UK university hospital.
                were unselected patients referred to the hospital DSN service. Primary outcome measures were length of hospital stay and patterns of readmission (frequency and time to first readmission). Secondary outcome measures were subjects' diabetes-related quality of life, diabetes knowledge score, satisfaction with treatment, and GP and community care contacts following discharge. Costs were estimated from the hospital and published sources.
                Median length of stay was lower in the intervention group (11.0 vs. 8.0 days, P < 0.01). Readmission rates were the same in the two groups (25%), and mean time to readmission was similar in the two groups, although slightly less in the control group (278 vs. 283 days, P = 0.80). The cost per patient for nursing input was 38.94 pounds sterling. However, when the reduced length of stay was accounted for, the intervention produced a mean cost per admission of 436 ponds sterling lower than that of the control group (P = 0.19). Patients in the intervention group were more knowledgeable regarding their diabetes and more satisfied with their care.
                Diabetes specialist nurses are potentially cost saving by reducing hospital length of stay (LOS). There was no evidence of an adverse effect of reduced LOS on re-admissions, use of community resources, or patient perception of quality of care. One hundred seven patients in an acute care setting who had lay sitters to provide the constant observation judged necessary to meet their safety needs were studied to determine the effect of psychiatric liaison nurse specialist (PLNS) consultation on nursing care and the use of sitters. After placement in either a suicidal or nonsuicidal group, subjects were randomly assigned to receive consultation or not. Outcome variables of number of sitter shifts, number of nursing note observations, number of patient and sitter incidents and length of hospital stay were considered. Multiple analysis of variance indicated no significant differences among the groups for number of sitter shifts or number of nursing note observations. A significant main effect for group on length of hospital stay was found with suicidal patients having a significantly shorter hospital stay. Number of patients and sitter incidents were too small for analysis. To evaluate quality of life (QOL) and cost outcomes of advanced practice nurses' (APNs') interventions with women diagnosed with breast cancer.
                Randomized clinical trial.
                Integrated healthcare system in a midwestern suburban community.
                210 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer with an age range of 30-85 years.
                The control group (n = 104) received standard medical care. The intervention group (n = 106) received standard care plus APN interventions based on Brooten's cost-quality model and the Oncology Nursing Society's standards of advanced practice in oncology nursing QOL was measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy, Mishel Uncertainty in Illness Scale and Profile of Mood States at seven intervals over two years. Information about costs (charges and reimbursement) was collected through billing systems.
                Uncertainty, mood states, well-being, charges, and reimbursement.
                Uncertainty decreased significantly more from baseline in the intervention versus control group at one, three, and six months after diagnosis (p = 0.001, 0.026, and 0.011, respectively), with the strongest effect on subscales of complexity, inconsistency, and unpredictability. Unmarried women and women with no family history of breast cancer benefited from nurse interventions in mood states and well-being. No significant cost differences were found.
                APN interventions improved some QOL indicators but did not raise or lower costs.
                The first six months after breast cancer diagnosis is a critical time during which APN interventions can improve QOL outcomes. More research is necessary to define cost-effective interventions. To determine the effect on quality of life and cost effectiveness of specialist nurse early supported discharge for women undergoing major abdominal and/or pelvic surgery for benign gynaecological disease compared with routine care.
                Randomised controlled trial comparing specialist nurse supported discharge with routine hospital care in gynaecology. The SF-36, a generic health status questionnaire, was used to measure women's evaluation of their health state before surgery and at 6 weeks after surgery. A further questionnaire scoring patient symptoms, milestones of recovery, information given and satisfaction, was administered prior to discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks thereafter.
                Gynaecology service at the Western Infirmary Glasgow, part of North Glasgow University, NHS Trust.
                One hundred and eleven women scheduled for major abdominal or pelvic surgery for benign gynaecological disease.
                SF-36 health survey questionnaire baseline scores were reported before surgery and at 6 weeks follow-up. Complications, length of hospital stay, readmission, information on discharge support and satisfaction of women were recorded at discharge from hospital and at 6 weeks follow-up. A cost consequence analysis was conducted based on the perspective of the NHS.
                The addition of a specialist nurse to routine hospital care in gynaecology significantly reduced the post-operative length of hospital stay p = 0.001, improved information delivery and satisfaction of women. The specialist nurse supported discharge group was associated with significantly lower total costs to the NHS than routine care resulting principally from the difference in the cost of the post-operative length of stay.
                Women undergoing major abdominal and pelvic surgery were discharged home earlier with provision of support from a specialist gynaecology nurse. The results of this study suggest that duration of hospital stay can be shortened by the introduction of a specialist nurse without introducing any adverse physical and psychological effects. This process of care is associated with receipt of information on health and lifestyle issues and maintenance of high levels of patient satisfaction and demonstrates the effectiveness of the specialist nurse role in the provision of health information for women. Earlier hospital discharge at 48 h after major abdominal and pelvic surgery is an acceptable, cost effective alternative to current routine practice in the absence of further randomised evidence. A nurse rehabilitator, supplementing routine physician/nursing coronary care unit (CCU) care, was found to be effective in increasing the return to work rate (p less than .05) and decreasing smoking (p less than .05) in a randomized trial of 102 patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). These outcomes were thought to be due to the nurse rehabilitator's efforts in increasing patient knowledge of heart disease (p less than .01) and individual counseling. In 1996 a new model of maternity care characterized by continuity of midwifery care from early pregnancy through to the postpartum period was implemented for women attending Monash Medical Centre, a tertiary level obstetric service, in Melbourne, Australia. The objective of this study was to compare the new model of care with standard maternity care.
                In a randomized controlled trial, 1000 women who booked at the antenatal clinic and met the eligibility criteria were randomly allocated to receive continuity of midwifery care (team care) from a group of seven midwives in collaboration with obstetric staff, or care from a variety of midwives and obstetric staff (standard care). The primary outcome measures were procedures in labor, maternal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, and length of hospital stay.
                Women assigned to the team care group experienced less augmentation of labor, less electronic fetal monitoring, less use of narcotic and epidural analgesia, and fewer episiotomies but more unsutured tears. Team care women stayed in hospital 7 hours less than women in standard care. More babies of standard care mothers were admitted to the special care nurseries for more than 5 days because of preterm birth, and more babies of team care mothers were admitted to the nurseries for more than 5 days with intrauterine growth retardation. No differences occurred in perinatal mortality between the two groups.
                Continuity of midwifery care was associated with a reduction in medical procedures in labor and a shorter length of stay without compromising maternal and perinatal safety. Continuity of midwifery care is realistically achievable in a tertiary obstetric referral service. Specialist nurses are being promoted as a means of improving the health care provided to people with multiple sclerosis (MS).
                To identify the impact of a programme of MS specialist nurses on MS health care provision and on the health and well-being of people with MS.
                A quasi-experimental design comparing an intervention group in which new MS nurse posts were installed with a control group that had no MS nurse posts.
                Six neurological services in four English regions.
                Seven hundred and fifty-three of the 1510 people invited to participate returned completed questionnaires at baseline. Follow-up of participants was 82% with 616 patients participating in the main outcome analysis.
                Data were collected prospectively before the appointment of the MS nurses and then at 12 and 24 months. Data were collected via a postal questionnaire comprising questions related to care processes (information provision and care quality) and health outcome measures, hospital admissions, MS complications, health-related quality of life (SF36) and disease impact (MS Impact Scale-29). Analysis repeated measures in CAT MOD for process variables and ANCOVA to longest follow-up for outcome measures.
                Information provision was higher in the intervention group (68% (n=153) compared to 53% (n=98) at 24 months) but no significant improvement was observed in information provision through time compared to the control group. There was an increase in the availability of a contact person in the intervention group, at 24 months 83% (n=42) had a contact person compared to 44% in the control (p=0.01). The only significant finding in relation to MS complications was a reduction of 17% in the incidence of pressure ulcers in the intervention sites compared to a 3% reduction in the control (p<0.001). In relation to the disease and health-related quality of life measures, the intervention group showed a small but significant (p<0.05) worsening in the physical and symptom scales of the SF36 compared to the control (mean differences: physical function -2.81, CI -5.45 to -0.1; bodily pain -4.09, CI -7.2 to -0.9; general health -5.35, CI -8.1 to -2.5; and energy and vitality -2.82, CI -5.5 to -0.1). No differences were observed in relation to disease impact or psychosocial well-being, although a relative benefit in mental health (with a 7.8 point advantage on the SF36 mental health scale, p=0.04) was observed in some of the intervention sites for people with relapsing/remitting MS.
                The specialist nurse programme was found to impact positively on the provision of MS-related health care. However, there was very limited evidence that the programme led to any improvements in disease-related problems, impact or health-related quality of life, These findings were in part explained by the inherent difficulties of measuring effects in evaluations of complex phenomena such as a nursing role. The deterioration observed in the intervention group on the physical outcome measures was explained by a selection bias in which people with worsening health were more likely to seek contact with a specialist nurse. It is contended that future research in this area may be better directed toward identifying specific interventions that nurses and other health professionals might employ in addressing the many problems confronting people with MS. To examine how improved attention to nutritional status and dietary intake, achieved through the employment of dietetic assistants (DAs), will affect postoperative clinical outcome among elderly women with hip fracture.
                Open prospective randomised controlled trial, comparing conventional nursing care with the additional nutritional support provided by DA.
                Thirty-eight bedded acute trauma ward in a teaching hospital.
                All but 11 of 344 consecutive admissions with acute nonpathological hip fracture were approached. Three hundred and eighteen (93%) agreed to inclusion. Sixteen were ineligible as they were immediately transferred to another acute ward, were managed conservatively or died preoperatively.
                Postoperative mortality in the acute trauma unit.
                Postoperative mortality at 4 months after fracture, length of stay, energy intake and nutritional status.
                DA-supported participants were less likely to die in the acute ward (4.1 versus 10.1%, P = 0.048). This effect was still apparent at 4 month follow-up (13.1 versus 22.9%, P = 0.036). DA-supported subjects had significantly better mean daily energy intake (1,105 kcal versus 756 kcal/24 h, 95% CI 259-440 kcal/24 h, P<0.001), significantly smaller reduction in mid-arm circumference during their inpatient stay (0.39 cm, P = 0.002) and nonsignificantly favourable results for other anthropometric and laboratory measurements.
                Dietetic or nutrition assistants are being introduced in units across the UK. This, the largest ever study of nutritional support after hip fracture, shows that their employment significantly reduced patients' risk of dying in the acute trauma unit; an effect that persisted at 4 month follow-up. A pilot project evaluated the effect of incorporating nursing assistive personnel (NAP) into the existing nursing professional practice model at a tertiary care university medical center. A plan to use permanent, unit-based NAP was developed, implemented, and evaluated. Among the findings were a redistribution of selected nursing activities and conditions enhancing the integration of NAP to fulfill nonprofessional tasks and thus support the work of the registered nurse. This study assessed the impact of an inpatient diabetes education program on: 1) staff nurses' and patients' knowledge about diabetes, 2) hospital length of stay, and 3) patients' glycemic control. Over the course of 1 year, a certified diabetes educator updated nursing staff about diabetes care and education and coordinated a diabetes education program on two experimental medical units. Length of stay of insulin-requiring patients with diabetes and their diabetes knowledge and glycemic control were compared with two control medical units that received no structured diabetes education program. Results showed a significant difference in length of stay and patient knowledge between experimental and control units. Three conditions commonly associated with diabetes (diabetic ketoacidosis, osteomyelitis, foot ulcer) did not account for this difference in length of stay. There was no significant difference between the groups in glycemic control following discharge. While all groups showed improvement in their glycosylated hemoglobin values, only the change in the values of the total population and the control groups was significant. The findings suggest that a Certified Diabetes Educator can decrease length of stay in the hospital setting. A study was conducted in a Dutch hospital to evaluate the effects of the implementation of a Dutch form of Primary Nursing on nurses' well-being in the work situation. The variables used as indicators of well-being at work were job satisfaction, experienced job significance, health complaints and absenteeism. The study included three measuring periods: one pre-intervention (t1) and two post-intervention periods (t2, 8 months after t1, and t3, 14 months after t1). Primary Nursing was implemented in group 1 (consisting of two nursing units) after t1. At this time no changes were introduced into group 2 (three nursing units) but after t2. Primary Nursing was also implemented in group 2. The research variables were measured by means of questionnaires. The results of the study indicate that most of the expected effects of Primary Nursing did not occur. Some methodological and practical explanations for this outcome are given. This study was set up to test the effectiveness of primary nursing on the burnout level of psychiatric nurses. It was expected that, under certain conditions, such as a primary nursing care delivery with an adequate feedback system, the burnout level would decrease. In a quasi-experimental research design, a cohort of 161 psychiatric nurses was followed for 2.5 years. Results showed that although the burnout level did not change as a result of primary nursing, psychiatric nurses and the practical nurses seemed able to work according to the principles of primary nursing. Strong indications were found that the job turnover decreased as a result of the introduction of primary nursing. Because two main problems were encountered in this study, a high drop-out due to job turnover among nurses and the imitation of the intervention by the control group, several additional analyses were performed. Several randomized trials have found that discharge planning improves outcomes for hospitalized patients. We do not know if adding a clinical nurse specialist (CNS) to physician teams in hospitals that already have discharge planning services makes a difference.
                In 2 teaching hospitals, patients were randomly assigned to regular hospital care or care with a clinical nurse specialist. The clinical nurse specialist facilitated hospital care by retrieving preadmission information, arranging in-hospital consultations and investigations, organizing postdischarge follow-up visits, and checking up on patients postdischarge with a telephone call. In-hospital outcomes included mortality and length of stay. Postdischarge outcomes included time to readmission or death, patient satisfaction, and the risk of adverse event. Adverse events were poor outcomes due to medical care rather than the natural history of disease.
                A total of 620 sequential patients were randomized (CNS n = 307, control n = 313), of which 361 were followed after discharge from hospital (CNS n = 175, control n = 186). The groups were similar for the probability of in-hospital death (CNS 9.3% vs control 9.7%) or being discharged to the community (58.0% vs 60.0%). The groups did not differ for postdischarge outcomes including readmission or death (21.6% vs 15.6%; P = 0.16) or risk of adverse event (23.6% vs 22.8%). Mean [SD] patient ratings of overall quality of care on a scale of 10 was higher in the clinical nurse specialist group (8.2 [2.2] vs 7.6 [2.4]; P = 0.052).
                The addition of a clinical nurse specialist to a medical team improved patient satisfaction but did not impact hospital efficiency or patient safety.
The findings suggest interventions relating to hospital nurse staffing models may improve some patient outcomes, particularly the addition of specialist nursing and specialist support roles to the nursing workforce. Interventions relating to hospital nurse staffing models may also improve staff-related outcomes, particularly the introduction of primary nursing and self-scheduling. However, these findings should be treated with extreme caution due to the limited evidence available from the research conducted to date.