Accuracy and impact of a point-of-care rapid influenza test in young children with respiratory illnesses. A randomized, controlled trial of the impact of early and rapid diagnosis of viral infections in children brought to an emergency department with febrile respiratory tract illnesses. Effect of point-of-care influenza testing on management of febrile children. Impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management in the pediatric emergency department: results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial.
To determine whether a point-of-care rapid influenza test impacts the diagnostic evaluation and treatment of children with acute respiratory illnesses.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                Pediatric emergency department and acute care clinic of a children's hospital.
                Children aged younger than 5 years with fever or acute respiratory symptoms during 2 influenza seasons (2002 through 2004).
                Surveillance days were randomized to performance or no performance of a point-of-care rapid influenza test. All children had a nasal and throat swab obtained for laboratory tests. The rapid test group had another nasal swab obtained for the QuickVue Influenza Test (Quidel Corp, San Diego, Calif), which was performed by nurses; results were shared immediately with treating physicians.
                Rapid test results were compared with results of the viral culture or 2 polymerase chain reaction assays for influenza. Diagnostic test ordering and antibiotic prescribing were compared for the groups.
                Of 468 enrolled children, 306 were from the emergency department and 162 from the clinic. Overall, 88 children (19%) had influenza infection. Of 205 children in the rapid test group, 51 (25%) had influenza infection. The rapid influenza test was 82% sensitive and 99% specific. In the emergency department, fewer children in the rapid test group had diagnostic tests ordered than in the no rapid test group (39% vs 51%, P = .03). There was no difference in test ordering in the clinic or in antibiotic prescribing in either setting. The use of antivirals was low.
                Point-of-care rapid influenza tests were sensitive and specific and were associated with less diagnostic testing in the emergency department. Acute respiratory tract infections represent a significant burden on pediatric emergency departments (ED) and families. We hypothesized that early and rapid diagnosis of a viral infection alleviates the need for ancillary testing and antibiotic treatment.
                We conducted a randomized, controlled trial of children 3 to 36 months of age with febrile acute respiratory tract infections at a pediatric ED. Two hundred four subjects were randomly assigned to receive rapid respiratory viral testing on admission or a routine ED admission protocol. Outcome measures were: mean length of visits, rate of ancillary tests, and antibiotic prescription in the ED. A follow-up call was made to all study subjects to inquire about further healthcare visits, ancillary testing, and antibiotic prescription after ED discharge.
                We did not find a statistically significant difference in ED length of visits, rate of ancillary testing, or antibiotic prescription rate in the ED between the study groups. There was, however, a significant reduction in antibiotic prescription after ED discharge (in the group who had rapid viral testing RR = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.14, 0.95).
                Rapid multi-viral testing in the ED did not significantly affect ED patient treatment but may reduce antibiotic prescription in the community after discharge from the ED, suggesting a novel strategy to alter community physician antibiotic prescription patterns. To determine the effect of point-of-care testing (POCT) for influenza on the physician management of febrile children who are at risk for serious bacterial illness (SBI) on the basis of age and temperature and who are presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) during an influenza outbreak.
                Patients 2-3 months of age with temperature of > or = 38 degrees C and patients 3-24 months of age with temperature of > or = 39 degrees C who were presenting to a pediatric ED during an influenza outbreak were enrolled into a prospective, quasi-randomized, controlled trial. Influenza testing was performed on enrolled patients by either the POCT or the standard-testing (ST) methods. The two groups were compared in terms of laboratory testing, chest radiography, antibiotic use, visit-associated costs, pediatric ED lengths of stay, inpatient admission, and return visits to the pediatric ED. Similar analyses also were performed on the resulting subgroups of patients on the basis of method of testing (POCT or ST) and test result (positive or negative).
                Of 767 eligible patients, 700 (91%) completed the study. No significant differences were demonstrated between the POCT and ST groups with respect to laboratory tests ordered, chest radiographs obtained, antibiotic administration, inpatient admission, return visits to the pediatric ED, lengths of stay, or visit-associated costs. In the subgroup analysis, the adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for blood culture in influenza test-positive to -negative patients were 0.59 and 0.71 in the POCT and ST groups, respectively (p = 0.088). The adjusted ORs for urine culture in influenza test-positive to -negative patients were 0.46 and 0.67 in the POCT and ST groups, respectively (p = 0.005).
                When using a strategy of performing influenza testing on all patients at risk for SBI who presented to a pediatric ED during an influenza outbreak, the method of testing (POCT or ST) did not appear to significantly alter physician management, cost, or length of stay in the pediatric ED. However, if the interaction of the method of testing and the test result (positive or negative) were considered, a positive POCT for influenza was associated with a significant reduction in orders for urinalyses and urine cultures. To determine the impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management, including laboratory tests and radiographs ordered, patient charges associated with these tests, antibiotics/antivirals prescribed, and length of time to patient discharge from the emergency department.
                Patients aged 2 months to 21 years presenting to an urban children's teaching hospital emergency department were screened for fever and cough, coryza, myalgias, headache, and/or malaise. After obtaining informed consent, patients were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: 1) physician receives (physician aware of) the rapid influenza test result; or 2) physician does not receive (physician unaware of) the result. For patients in the physician aware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, immediately tested with the FluOIA test for influenza A and B, and the result was placed on the chart before patient evaluation by the attending physician. For the physician unaware group, nasopharyngeal swabs were obtained, stored according to manufacturer's directions, and tested within 24 hours. Results for the physician unaware group were not disclosed to the treating physicians at any time. The 2 resultant influenza-positive groups (aware and unaware) were compared for laboratory and radiograph studies and their associated patient charges, antibiotic/antiviral prescriptions, and length of stay in the emergency department.
                A total of 418 patients were enrolled, and 391 completed the study. Of these, 202 tested positive for influenza. Comparison of the 96 influenza-positive patients whose physician was aware of the result with the 106 influenza-positive patients whose physician was unaware of the result revealed significant reductions among the former group in: 1) numbers of complete blood counts, blood cultures, urinalyses, urine cultures, and chest radiographs performed; 2) charges associated with these tests; 3) antibiotics prescribed; and 4) length of stay in the emergency department. The number of influenza-positive patients who received prescriptions for antiviral drugs was significantly higher among those whose physician was aware of the result.
                Physician awareness of a rapid diagnosis of influenza in the pediatric emergency department significantly reduced the number of laboratory tests and radiographs ordered and their associated charges, decreased antibiotic use, increased antiviral use, and decreased length of time to discharge.
Current evidence is insufficient to support routine rapid viral testing as a means to reduce antibiotic use in pediatric EDs. Results suggest that rapid viral testing may be beneficial in terms of reducing rates of antibiotic usage, urine investigations and blood investigations, but are not statistically significant due to lack of power. Rapid viral testing does reduce the rate of chest X-rays in the ED. A large trial addressing the effect on antibiotic usage is needed.