Gloucester hospital-at-home: a randomized controlled trial. Early discharge and home rehabilitation after hip fracture achieves functional improvements: a randomized controlled trial. A randomized controlled trial of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm. Comparison of short (3-day) hospitalization followed by home care treatment and conventional (10-day) hospitalization for acute ischemic stroke. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. Patients' and carers' preferences in two models of care for acute exacerbations of COPD: results of a randomised controlled trial. Early discharge for patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized controlled trial. Randomized controlled trial of an early discharge rehabilitation service: the Belfast Community Stroke Trial. Randomized controlled trial of supported discharge in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A randomized controlled trial of a high support hospital discharge team for elderly people. Early supported discharge of patients with acute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. There's no place like home : an evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke. Does home treatment affect delirium? A randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation of elderly and care at home or usual treatment (The REACH-OUT trial). Randomised controlled trial of early discharge for inguinal hernia and varicose veins. The effectiveness, acceptability and costs of a hospital-at-home service compared with acute hospital care: a randomized controlled trial. Hospital at home or acute hospital care? A cost minimisation analysis. Sooner and healthier: a randomised controlled trial and interview study of an early discharge rehabilitation service for older people. A trial of early discharge with homecare compared to conventional hospital care for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Day care after operations for hernia or varicose veins: a controlled trial. Evaluation of an extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge for patients living in a rural community. A randomized controlled trial. Early supported hospital discharge following acute stroke: pilot study results. Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: which aspects are most important? Home or hospital for stroke Rehabilitation? Results of a randomized controlled trial : II: cost minimization analysis at 6 months. Randomised controlled trial to evaluate early discharge scheme for patients with stroke.
Hospital-at-Home schemes have been claimed to hasten the discharge of elderly orthopaedic patients, and are becoming increasingly popular with health service managers. In an attempt to measure the benefits of such a scheme when applied to elderly medical patients, we prospectively randomized 60 consecutive referrals of patients approaching discharge either to the Hospital-at-Home (HAH) rehabilitation team, or to conventional discharge (CD) preparation and domiciliary support. Patients allocated to HAH were discharged on average 5 days earlier than CD, while 64% of each group remained at home during 6 months follow-up. Improvements in independence were modest, and similar in the two groups, though a trend favoured HAH. To compare hospital and home settings for the rehabilitation of patients following hip fracture.
                Randomized controlled trial comparing accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation (n = 34) with conventional hospital care (n = 32) for patients admitted to hospital with hip fracture.
                Three metropolitan hospitals in Adelaide, Australia.
                Sixty-six patients with fractured hip.
                Patients assigned to the home-based rehabilitation group were discharged within 48 hours of randomization. The project team therapists made visits to the patient's home and negotiated a set of realistic, short-term and measurable treatment goals with both the patient and carer. Those randomized to usual care remained in hospital for conventional rehabilitation.
                Physical and social dependence, balance confidence, quality of life, carer strain, patient and carer satisfaction, use of community services and incidence of adverse events such as re-admission and falls.
                While there was no difference between the groups for all measures of quality of life, patients in the accelerated discharge and home-based rehabilitation group recorded a greater improvement in MBI from randomization (p < 0.05) and scored higher on the Falls Efficacy Scale (p < 0.05) at four months. There was no difference in falls rates. Patients in the home-based rehabilitation group had a shorter stay in hospital (p < 0.05) but a longer stay in rehabilitation overall (p < 0.001). The groups were comparable on the rate and length of admissions after discharge, use of community services, need for carer input and contact with general practitioner (GP) after discharge.
                This trial further supports the practice of accelerated discharge from hospital and home-based rehabilitation in selected patients recovering from hip fracture. Such a practice appears to improve physical independence and confidence in avoiding subsequent falls which may have implications for longevity and overall quality of life. This study describes the methodology, patient outcome, and use of hospital and rehabilitation services at 3 months of a population-based randomized controlled trial. The purpose was to evaluate rehabilitation at home after early supported discharge from the Department of Neurology, Huddinge Hospital, for moderately disabled stroke patients in southwest Stockholm.
                The patients were eligible if they were continent, independent in feeding, had mental function within normal limits, and had impaired motor function and/or aphasia 1 week after stroke. Patients were randomized either to early supported discharge with continuity of rehabilitation at home for 3 to 4 months or to routine rehabilitation service in a hospital, day care, and/or outpatient care. The home rehabilitation team consisted of two physical therapists, two occupational therapists, and one speech therapist; one of the therapists was assigned as case manager for the patient. The rehabilitation program at home emphasized a task- and context-oriented approach. The activities were chosen on the basis of the patient's personal interests. Spouses were offered education and individual counseling. A total of 81 patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months. Patient outcome was assessed by the Frenchay Social Activity Index, Extended Katz Index, Barthel Index, Lindmark Motor Capacity Assessment, Nine-Hole Peg Test, walking speed over 10 m, reported falls, and subjective dysfunction according to the Sickness Impact Profile. Patient use of hospital and home rehabilitation service and patient satisfaction with care were studied.
                Overall there were no statistical significant differences in outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis suggested a systematic positive effect for the home rehabilitation group in social activity, activities of daily living, motor capacity, manual dexterity, and walking. A considerable difference in resource use during such a 3-month period was seen. A 52% reduction in hospitalization was observed: from 29 days in the routine rehabilitation group to 14 days in the home rehabilitation group. Patient satisfaction was in favor of the latter group.
                Early supported discharge with continuity of home rehabilitation services for the majority of moderately disabled stroke patients during the first 3-month period after acute stroke is not less beneficial than routine rehabilitation and can be a rehabilitation service of choice if follow-up at 6 and 12 months confirms the suggested effectiveness and considerable reduction in use of health care. This prospective randomized controlled study was designed to compare the treatment efficacy, safety and quality of life of ischemic stroke patients treated with conventional (10-day) hospitalization or short (3-day) hospitalization followed by home care treatment. One hundred and two patients with acute ischemic stroke who arrived within 48 h after symptom onset and met the inclusion criteria were studied. Patients were randomly assigned to either of two groups of treatment. Patients in the 'hospitalization' group were hospitalized for 10 days, whereas those in the 'home care' group were admitted only for the first 3 days and were followed at home under the home care program. The baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. There was no difference in the number of deaths or dependency defined by the Modified Rankin scale more than or equal to 3 between the two groups at 6 months. The relative risk was 0.85 with a 95% confidence interval between 0.35 and 2.04. There was also no difference in the number of patients who had good outcome (NIHSS between 0 and 2 and Barthel index between 75 and 100) at 6 months. One patient in the home care group died due to massive intracerebral hemorrhage. Seventy-nine percent of patients in the home care group were satisfied with the home treatment program.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel To compare hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care in terms of patient outcomes.
                Randomised controlled trial with three month follow up.
                District general hospital and catchment area of neighbouring community trust.
                Patients recovering from hip replacement (n=86), knee replacement (n=86), and hysterectomy (n=238); elderly medical patients (n=96); and patients with chronic obstructive airways disease (n=32).
                Hospital at home care or inpatient hospital care.
                Dartmouth COOP chart to measure patients' general health status; SF-36 to measure possible limitations in physical functioning of patients with hysterectomy; disease specific measures-chronic respiratory disease questionnaire, Barthel index for elderly medical patients, Oxford hip score, and Bristol knee score; hospital readmission and mortality data; carer strain index to measure burden on carers; patients' and carers' preferred form of care.
                At follow up, there were no major differences in outcome between hospital at home care and hospital care for any of the patient groups except that those recovering from hip replacement reported a significantly greater improvement in quality of life with hospital at home care (difference in change from baseline value 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.88). Hospital at home did not seem suitable for patients recovering from a knee replacement, as 14 (30%) of patients allocated to hospital at home remained in hospital. Patients in all groups preferred hospital at home care except those with chronic obstructive airways disease. No differences were detected for carer burden. Carers of patients recovering from knee replacement preferred hospital at home care, while carers of patients recovering from a hysterectomy preferred hospital care.
                Few differences in outcome were detected. Thus, the cost of hospital at home compared with hospital care becomes a primary concern. Patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were randomised to either hospital at home (HaH) or inpatient management, and patient and carer preferred site of management and satisfaction with care received in the two arms was determined.
                Emergency admissions with an acute exacerbation of COPD were randomised to inpatient care or HaH care. After discharge an independent observer administered a questionnaire to both patients and carers on the preferred site of care and scored satisfaction with the care received.
                Of 60 patients recruited, 30 were randomised to receive HaH care. Retrospective patient preference for HaH care was 96.3% in the domiciliary arm and 59.3% in the conventional arm; carer preference figures were 85.7% and 42.9%, respectively. There was a higher preference for domiciliary care by both patients and carers in the HaH arm than in the inpatient arm (p=0.001 and p=0.01, respectively). Patients recorded equal satisfaction with care in the two arms (88.1% in the conventional arm, 91.7% in the domiciliary arm); carer scores were 91.3% and 91.9%, respectively.
                The results of this study show that both patients and carers were significantly more likely to prefer domiciliary care if they were in the HaH arm. Since patients had to be willing to be looked after at home, both patients' and carers' perceptions of the benefits of HaH care were reinforced by their experience. HaH care of acute exacerbations of COPD is the preferred option in suitable patients. We have previously reported the use of a hospital based respiratory nurse service (Acute Respiratory Assessment Service, ARAS) to support home treatment of patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). A controlled trial was undertaken to compare early discharge with home treatment supported by respiratory nurses with conventional hospital management of patients admitted with exacerbations of COPD.
                Patients with COPD admitted as emergencies were identified the next working day. They were eligible for inclusion in the study if the differential diagnosis included an exacerbation of COPD, but were excluded if other medical conditions or acidotic respiratory failure required inpatient investigation or management. Of 360 patients reviewed, 209 were being assessed for other active medical problems and were excluded, 33 potential participants were already involved in research studies and so were ineligible, and 37 did not wish to participate in the study. Eighty one patients were randomised to receive conventional inpatient care (n=40) or to planned early discharge the next working day (n=41). Those discharged early continued treatment at home under the supervision of specialist respiratory nurses. Outcome measures were readmission, additional hospital days, and deaths within 60 days of initial admission. Process measures included number of visits, duration of follow up by the respiratory nurse, and additional treatment provided to support early discharge.
                On an intention to treat basis, a policy of early discharge reduced inpatient stay from a mean of 6.1 (range 1-13) days with conventional management to 3.2 (1-16) days with an early discharge policy. Twelve patients (30% conventional management, 29.3% early discharge) were readmitted in each group giving a mean difference in readmission of 0.7% (95% CI of the difference -19.2 to 20.6). In the conventional management group readmitted patients spent a mean of 8.75 additional days in hospital compared with 7.83 days in the early discharge group, giving a mean difference of 0.92 days (95% CI of the difference -6.5 to 8.3). There were two deaths (5%) in the conventional management group and one (2.4%) in the early discharge group, a mean difference of 2.6% (95% CI of the difference -5.7 to 10.8).
                Patients with acute exacerbations of COPD uncomplicated by acidotic respiratory failure or other medical problems can be discharged home earlier than is current practice with support by visiting respiratory nurses. No difference was found in the subsequent need for readmission. To compare a community-based multidisciplinary stroke team (CST) approach with hospital-based rehabilitation in terms of hospital stay, functioning, quality of life, and service use and costs.
                Stroke patients who met pre-agreed criteria were allocated randomly to the CST service (n=59) or to usual inpatient rehabilitation and follow-up care (n=54). Assessments were completed at randomization and 12 months later. Caregiver strain and satisfaction (n=55) were also assessed. Cost data were collected for a subsample of 38 patients.
                Almost 80% of surviving patients (n=691) were discharged home and a small number (n=55) were readmitted. Approximately 17% (113/649) were randomized. There were no statistically significant differences in hospital duration, costs, or outcome measures at baseline and 12 months except for higher satisfaction reported by CST patients. Overall, both groups recorded improvement in most domains over time. Carers reported a high level of satisfaction although the level of strain among carers is cause for concern. The community group (n=18) cost less than the hospital group (n=20).
                A mixed model of hospital-based and community-based rehabilitation services is likely to lead to increased patient choice and satisfaction and a potential reduction in bed pressures for less severe stroke patients. A randomised trial was performed on patients presenting to hospital with an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to compare outcomes in those managed at home with support with those admitted to hospital in the standard manner.
                Over an 18 month period all patients presenting to the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh on weekdays (n=718) with a diagnosis of an exacerbation of COPD were assessed for inclusion in the trial. Patients with impaired level of consciousness, acute confusion, acute changes on radiography, or an arterial pH of <7.35 or with other serious medical or social reasons for admission were excluded. Patients randomised to home support were discharged with an appropriate treatment package (antibiotics, corticosteroids, nebulised bronchodilators and, if necessary, home oxygen). They were visited by a nurse the following day and thereafter at intervals of 2-3 days until recovery when they were discharged from follow up. Parallel observations were made on patients allocated to normal hospital admission up to the point of discharge. Patients in both groups were assessed at home eight weeks after the initial assessment.
                Among weekday patients 353 (50%) were considered obligatory admissions, 140 (19%) were admitted because of co-morbidity, 17 (2%) because of poor social circumstances, and 24 (3%) did not consent to the trial. The remaining 184 (26%) were randomised (2:1) either to home support or to a standard hospital admission. The median time to discharge was 7 days for the home support group and 5 days for the admitted group (p<0.01); 25% of the home support group and 34% of the admitted group were readmitted before the final assessment at eight weeks (p>0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in attendances by GPs and carers or in health status measured eight weeks after the initial assessment. Satisfaction with the service was good. The mean total health service cost per patient was estimated as 877 pounds sterling for the home support group and 1753 pounds sterling for the admitted group.
                This study shows that home supported discharge is a well tolerated, safe, and economic alternative to hospital admission for a proportion of patients referred to hospital for admission for an exacerbation of COPD. The Home Treatment Team (HTT), a hospital discharge team for elderly patients, was created to provide practical help and promote independence of patients at home for up to 6 weeks after hospital discharge. Patients were those judged to be at particular risk of failing to resettle, and thus being readmitted to hospital or admitted to a residential or nursing home. An open randomized controlled trial compared patients receiving the HTT (n = 29) with controls (n = 25) receiving appropriate conventional community services. Fewer HTT patients were readmitted (four by 6 weeks and nine by 12 weeks) than controls (nine by 6 weeks and 14 by 12 weeks, p < 0.05) and more were at home at 6 weeks (24, 83% and 10, 40%, p < 0.05), 12 weeks (21, 72% and 11, 44%, p < 0.05) and 12 months (17, 58% and 10, 40%, p < 0.05). The HTT group spent fewer days in hospital than controls during 12 weeks (median difference 34 days, 95% confidence interval 0-75, p < 0.05) and more days at home during 12 months (90; 247-0, p = 0.02). Neither group showed any significant change in mental state or functional abilities over 12 weeks. Potentially confounding factors were considered insufficient explanation for the difference in outcome between the groups. It is concluded that the HTT was of benefit but the mechanism of its effect was not identified. To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of early supported discharge (ESD) following acute stroke.
                An ESD scheme was compared to conventional rehabilitation in a randomized controlled trial. All patients admitted with acute stroke were considered for inclusion. Eighty-eight (20.2%) were found to be eligible and 82 were randomized either to early supported discharge (n = 42) or conventional rehabilitation (n = 40). The primary outcome measure was the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. The General Health Questionnaire, the Montgomery Aasberg Depression Rating Scale, mortality, placement and patient and career satisfaction served as secondary outcome measures.
                Median length of stay was reduced from 31 days in the conventional hospital rehabilitation group to 22 days in the early supported discharge group (p = 0.09). No differences were found regarding primary outcome. The General Health Questionnaire score showed a significant difference in favour of the early supported discharge group at three months (19.5/24, p = 0.02), but not at six. At six months, the proportion of patients being dead or in institution showed a trend of being higher in the conventional rehabilitation group (OR 3.8, 95% CI 0.8-23).
                Early supported discharge after stroke is feasible and it is possible that it has benefits compared with conventional rehabilitation. Because stroke management is aimed at facilitating community reintegration, it would be logical that the sooner the patient can be discharged home, the sooner reintegration can commence. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation on function, community reintegration, and health-related quality of life during the first 3 months after stroke.
                A randomized trial was carried out involving patients who required rehabilitation services and who had a caregiver at home. When medically ready for discharge, persons with stroke were randomized to either the home intervention group (n=58) or the usual care group (n=56). The home group received a 4-week, tailor-made home program of rehabilitation and nursing services; persons randomized to the usual care group received services provided through a variety of mechanisms, depending on institutional, care provider, and personal preference. The main outcome measure was the Physical Health component of the Measuring Outcomes Study Short-Form-36 (SF-36). Associated outcomes measures included the Timed Up & Go (TUG), Barthel Index (BI), the Older Americans Resource Scale for instrumental activities of daily living (OARS-IADL), Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL), and the SF-36 Mental Health component.
                The total length of stay for the home group was, on average, 10 days, 6 days shorter than that for the usual care group. There were no differences between the 2 groups on the BI or on the TUG at either 1 or 3 months after stroke; however, there was a significantly beneficial impact of the home intervention on IADL and reintegration (RNL). By 3 months after stroke, the home intervention group showed a significantly higher score on the SF-36 Physical Health component than the usual care group. The total number of services received by the home group was actually lower than that received by the usual care group.
                Prompt discharge combined with home rehabilitation appeared to translate motor and functional gains that occur through natural recovery and rehabilitation into a greater degree of higher-level function and satisfaction with community reintegration, and these in turn were translated into a better physical health. delirium is a frequent adverse consequence of hospitalisation for older patients, but there has been little research into its prevention. A recent study of Hospital in the Home (admission substitution) noted less delirium in the home-treated group.
                a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Sydney, Australia.
                we randomised 104 consecutive patients referred for geriatric rehabilitation to be treated in one of two ways, either in Hospital in the Home (early discharge) or in hospital, in a rehabilitation ward. We compared the occurrence of delirium measured by the confusion assessment method. Secondary outcome measures were length of stay, hospital bed days, cost of acute care and rehabilitation, functional independence measure (FIM), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and geriatric depression score (GDS) assessed on discharge and at 1- and 6-month follow-up and patient satisfaction.
                the home group had lower odds of developing delirium during rehabilitation [odds ratio (OR) = 0.17; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.65], shorter duration of rehabilitation (15.97 versus 23.09 days; P = 0.0164) and used less hospital bed days (20.31 versus 40.09, P < or = 0.0001). The cost was lower for the acute plus rehabilitation phases (7,680 pounds versus 10,598 pounds; P = 0.0109) and the rehabilitation phase alone (2,523 pounds versus 6,100 pounds; P < or = 0.0001). There was no difference in FIM, MMSE or GDS scores. the home group was more satisfied (P = 0.0057).
                home rehabilitation for frail elderly after acute hospitalisation is a viable option for selected patients and is associated with a lower risk of delirium, greater patient satisfaction, lower cost and more efficient hospital bed use. A randomised controlled trial has been conducted into the effects of discharging patients from hospital either 48 hours or six to seven days after operations for inguinal hernia and varicose veins. There was no statistically significant difference in major postoperative complications between the two lengths of stay for either of the two conditions. Similarly there was no difference between the two groups of hernia patients in relation to eventual recurrences. There was no significant difference in length of convalescence between long-stay and short-stay patients in full-time occupations. The savings to the statutory services of discharging patients early were estimated at 25.72 pounds per patient. Patients appeared to approve of the type of care they experienced, regardless of length of stay. However, the families of short-stay patients were significantly less enthusiastic in their attitudes towards the policy of early discharge than the families of long-stay patients. To compare the safety, effectiveness, acceptability and costs of a hospital-at-home programme with usual acute hospital inpatient care.
                Patients aged 55 years or over being treated for an acute medical problem were randomized to receive either standard inpatient hospital care or hospital-at-home care. Follow-up was for 90 days after randomization. Health outcome measures included physical and mental function, self-rated recovery, health status as assessed by the SF-36, adverse events and readmissions to hospital. Acceptability was assessed using satisfaction surveys and the Carer Strain Index. Costs comprised hospital care, care in the home, community services, general practitioner services and personal health care expenses.
                In all, 285 people were randomized with a mean age of 80 years. There were no significant differences in health outcome measures between the two randomized groups. Significantly more patients receiving care at home reported high levels of satisfaction, as did more of their relatives. Relatives of the care-at-home group also reported significantly lower scores on the Carer Strain Index. However, the mean cost per patient was almost twice for patients treated at home (NZ 6524 dollars) as for standard hospital care (NZ 3525 dollars). A sensitivity analysis indicated that, if the service providing care in the home had been operating at full capacity, the mean cost per patient episode would have been similar for both modes of care.
                This hospital-at-home programme was found to be more acceptable and as effective and safe as inpatient care. While caring for patients at home was significantly more costly than standard inpatient care, this was largely due to the hospital-at-home programme not operating at full capacity. To compare, from the viewpoints of the NHS and social services and of patients, the costs associated with early discharge to a hospital at home scheme and those associated with continued care in an acute hospital.
                Cost minimisation analysis.
                Acute hospital wards and the community in the north of Bristol (population about 224 000).
                241 hospitalised but medically stable elderly patients who fulfilled the criteria for early discharge to a hospital at home scheme and who consented to participate.
                Costs to the NHS, social services, and patients over the 3 months after randomisation.
                The mean cost for hospital at home patients over the 3 months was 2516 pounds, whereas that for hospital patients was 3292 pounds. Under all the assumptions used in the sensitivity analysis, the cost of hospital at home care was less than that of hospital care. Only when hospital costs were assumed to be less than 50% of those used in the initial analysis was the difference equivocal.
                The hospital at home scheme is less costly than care in the acute hospital. These results may be generalisable to schemes of similar size and scope, operating in a similar context of rising acute admissions. Hospitals are under pressure from admissions of increasing numbers of older people. Older people may suffer unnecessary activity limitation after acute illnesses through lack of appropriate rehabilitation.
                To evaluate an early discharge and rehabilitation service for older people.
                A randomised controlled trial comparing an early discharge and rehabilitation with standard hospital aftercare. Outcome measures assessed at 3 and 12 months were the Barthel Index, Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living and EuroQol (for patients) the General Health Questionnaire (for patients and carers). Use of services over 12 months was recorded. An interview study of patients and staff was conducted.
                The early discharge and rehabilitation service offered a home-based rehabilitation and care programme for up to 4 weeks.
                370 hospitalised older medical and surgical patients were included in the randomised controlled trial. Twenty patients and 11 staff were interviewed.
                Subjects in the early discharge rehabilitation service group used fewer days in hospital at 3 months (mean difference 9, median difference 4 days, 95% CI of median difference 2-8). At 3 months the early discharge and rehabilitation service patients had better Barthel scores (mean difference 1.2, 95% CI 0.4-1.9), Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living kitchen scores (mean difference 1.2, 95% CI 0.2-2.3), Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living domestic scores (mean difference 1.1, 95% CI 0.2-2.0) and General Health Questionnaire scores (mean difference 2.4, 95% CI 0.7-4.1). Significant Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living domestic and General Health Questionnaire benefits remained at 12 months. The early discharge and rehabilitation service carers had better General Health Questionnaire scores at 3 months (mean difference 2.0, 95% CI 0.1-3.8). The interviews suggested that the early discharge and rehabilitation service was patient-centred, set clear goals, worked as a team, and considered physical, psychological, social and environmental issues. It was found to be highly satisfactory.
                Some older people can be discharged from hospital sooner, with better health outcomes using a well-staffed and organised patient-centred early discharge service providing rehabilitation. nan Alternative systems of care after operations for varicose veins or hernia were compared in a total of 360 selected patients, of whom 121 were allocated to be managed in an acute ward for 48 h, 122 in a convalescent hospital for 48 h and 117 to be discharged directly home to the care of the district nursing sister and general practitioner. There were no deaths or major complications. Anaesthetic or surgical problems caused 5 patients (3 convalescent and 2 day care) to be retained in hospital on the day of operation. Minor complications were recorded in approximately one-third of the patients. The majority of these were effectively dealt with by the district nursing sister and only one-third of the complications needed the attention of the general practitioner. Two of the ward patients and 1 of the convalescent patients required readmission to hospital (1 per cent in all). No significant difference was demonstrated in the medical outcome between the three groups after operation. Day care was the most economical of the three systems of care. Inquiry into the patients' opinions elicited the highest proportion of favourable responses in the day care group. To evaluate the effect of an extended stroke unit service (extended service), with early supported discharge and co-ordination of further rehabilitation in co-operation with the primary health care system in three rural municipalities.
                A randomized controlled trial comparing extended service with ordinary stroke unit service (ordinary service).
                Sixty-two eligible patients with acute stroke living in the rural municipalities of Malvik, Melhus and Klaebu.
                The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were independent according to Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (independence = mRS < or = 2) 52 weeks after onset of stroke. Secondary outcomes were mRS at 6 and 26 weeks and Barthel Index (BI), Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) at 6, 26 and 52 weeks. Mortality and length of stay were registered during the 52 weeks.
                Twelve patients (39%) in the extended service group versus 16 patients (52%) in the ordinary service group were independent according to mRS at 52 weeks (p = 0.444). The odds ratio for independence (extended service versus ordinary service) was 0.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.088-1.234). According to outcome by secondary measures there were no significant differences except less social isolation on NHP in the extended service group at 26 weeks (p = 0.046). There were no significant differences in length of stay.
                An extended stroke unit service with early supported discharge seems to have no positive effect on functional outcome for patients living in rural communities, but might give a trend toward better quality of life. There were no significant differences in length of stay. To establish the feasibility and method of evaluation of an early supported hospital discharge policy for patients with acute stroke.
                A randomized controlled trial comparing an early supported discharge service to conventional care.
                Three acute hospitals in Newcastle upon Tyne.
                Ninety-two eligible patients with acute stroke admitted between 1 February 1995 and 31 January 1996.
                Placement, length of stay, readmission rates, mortality, functional ability (Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale), handicap (Oxford Handicap Scale), global health status (Dartmouth Coop Function Charts) and carer stress (General Health Questionnaire 30 item).
                The median length of stay for patients randomized to early supported discharge was 13 days compared to 22 days in the conventional care group (p = 0.02). The median Barthel ADL index at seven days post stroke of patients randomized to early supported discharge was 15, and 13 for those randomized to conventional care (NS). At three months post stroke the median Nottingham EADL score of patients randomized to early supported discharge was 10 compared to 7 for those who received conventional care (NS). There were no statistically significant differences in the global health status of patients or carer stress.
                An early supported discharge service following acute stroke with individualized rehabilitation in the community is feasible and can be evaluated by a randomized controlled trial but a larger multicentre trial is needed before such a service is widely adopted. We have previously shown that treatment of acute stroke patients in our stroke unit (SU) compared with treatment in general ward (GWs) improves short- and long-term survival and functional outcome and increases the possibility of earlier discharge to home. The aim of the present study was to identify the differences in treatment between the SU and the GW and to assess which aspects of the SU care which were most responsible for the better outcome.
                Of the 220 patients included in our trial, only 206 were actually treated (SU, 102 patients; GW, 104 patients). For these patients, we identified the differences in the treatment and the consequences of the treatment. We analyzed the factors that we were able to measure and their association with the outcome, discharge to home within 6 weeks.
                Characteristic features in our SU were teamwork, staff education, functional training, and integrated physiotherapy and nursing. Other treatment factors significantly different in the SU from the GW were shorter time to start of the systematic mobilization/training and increased use of oxygen, heparin, intravenous saline solutions, and antipyretics. Consequences of the treatment seem to be less variation in diastolic and systolic blood pressure (BP), avoiding the lowest diastolic BP, and lowering the levels of glucose and temperature in the SU group compared with the GW group. Univariate analyses showed that all these factors except the level of glucose were significantly associated with discharge to home within 6 weeks. In the final multivariate Cox regression model, shorter time to start of the mobilization/training and stabilized diastolic BP were independent factors significantly associated with discharge to home within 6 weeks.
                Shorter time to start of mobilization/training was the most important factor associated with discharge to home, followed by stabilized diastolic BP, indicating that these factors probably were important in the SU treatment. The effects of characteristic features of an SU, such as a specially trained staff, teamwork, and involvement of relatives, were not possible to measure. Such factors might be more important than those actually measured. The goal of the present study was to examine the resource and economic implications of an early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation scheme for patients with acute stroke.
                A cost minimization analysis in conjunction with a randomized controlled trial was carried out at 2 affiliated teaching hospitals in the southern metropolitan region of Adelaide, South Australia, between 1997 and 1998. Eighty-six hospitalized patients with acute stroke who required rehabilitation were randomized to receive both early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation, or conventional in-hospital rehabilitation and community care. Direct and indirect costs related to stroke rehabilitation were calculated, including hospital bed days, home-based intervention program, community services, and personal expenses during the 6 months after randomization.
                The mean cost per patient was lower for patients randomized to the early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation ($8040) compared with those who received conventional care ($10 054). This cost saving was not statistically significant (P=0.14). However, sensitivity analyses indicated that the cost of home-based rehabilitation was consistently lower than that of conventional care except when hospital costs were assumed to be 50% less than those used in the main analysis. Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that the cost of the home-based program was significantly related to a patient's level of disability after adjustment for age, comorbidity, and the presence or absence of a caregiver.
                The early hospital discharge and home-based rehabilitation scheme was less costly than conventional hospital care for patients with stroke. Limitation of the provision of such services to patients with mild disability is likely to be most cost effective. To assess the clinical effectiveness of an early discharge policy for patients with stroke by using a community based rehabilitation team.
                Randomised controlled trial to compare conventional care with an early discharge policy.
                Two teaching hospitals in inner London.
                331 medically stable patients with stroke (mean age 71) who lived alone and were able to transfer independently or who lived with a resident carer and were able to transfer with help.
                167 patients received specialist community rehabilitation for up to 3 months after randomisation. 164 patients continued with conventional hospital and community care.
                Barthel score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes measured impairment with motoricity index, minimental state examination, and Frenchay aphasia screening test; disability with the Rivermead activity of daily living scales, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and 5 m walk; handicap with the Nottingham health profile; carer stress with caregiver strain index and patient and carer satisfaction. The main process measure was length of stay after randomisation.
                One year after randomisation no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found apart from increased satisfaction with hospital care in the community therapy group. Length of stay after randomisation in the community therapy group was significantly reduced (12 v 18 days; P < 0.0001). Patients with impairments were more likely to receive treatment in the community therapy group.
                Early discharge with specialist community rehabilitation after stroke is feasible, as clinically effective as conventional care, and acceptable to patients. Considerable reductions in use of hospital beds are achievable.
Despite increasing interest in the potential of early discharge hospital at home services as a cheaper alternative to in-patient care, this review provides insufficient objective evidence of economic benefit or improved health outcomes.