Closed reduction of colles fractures: comparison of manual manipulation and finger-trap traction: a prospective, randomized study. [Reposition of Colles' fracture--a new, more rapid, simpler and cheaper method]. Reduction of Colles' fractures without anaesthesia using a new dynamic bone alignment system.
An optimal outcome of closed treatment of a Colles fracture may depend on accurate reduction and adequate immobilization. It has been suggested that the use of finger-trap traction results in a better reduction and a lower rate of redisplacement than manual manipulation does, but to our knowledge these concepts have never been evaluated scientifically. We compared these two methods in a prospective, randomized controlled trial.
                Two hundred and twenty-three patients with 225 displaced Colles-type fractures were randomized to treatment with closed reduction with either finger-trap traction (112 patients) or manual manipulation (111 patients). The fractures were assessed radiographically by measurement of the radial angle, dorsal tilt, and radial shortening before reduction, immediately after reduction, and at one and five weeks after reduction.
                The groups were comparable with regard to age, sex, side of injury, fracture grade, and amount of displacement at presentation. No significant differences were found between the alignment of the fractures in the two treatment groups at any time. With dorsal tilt of <10 degrees and radial shortening of <5 mm considered acceptable, the two techniques both produced an 87% rate of satisfactory reductions. However, the percentages of fractures in an acceptable alignment were only 57% and 50% at one week after finger-trap traction and manual manipulation, respectively, and only 27% and 32% at five weeks. The failure rates did not differ significantly between the two groups.
                The two methods of fracture reduction did not differ with regard to the eventual position of the fracture or the rate of failure. Although closed reduction was successful for the majority of fractures, most redisplaced substantially during the period of cast immobilization. nan Two techniques for reduction of Colles' fractures were compared in a prospective, randomized study. With use of a newly designed dynamic bone alignment device, reduction manoeuvres were performed on 62 patients with Colles' fractures (group A) without any form of anaesthesia. In a control group of 54 patients (group B) Colles' fractures were reduced manually in the traditional way using local infiltration anaesthesia. In each group the pain experienced by the patients was recorded. Severe pain during the reduction was reported by 8 per cent of the patients in group A and by 35 per cent of those in group B. No complications occurred during or after dynamic reduction without anaesthesia. This method of treatment seems to be a very gentle one for the patients, with the advantage of causing less pain than treatment under local anaesthesia.
There was insufficient evidence from comparisons tested within randomised controlled trials to establish the relative effectiveness of different methods of closed reduction used in the treatment of displaced fractures of the distal radius in adults.