Intravenous magnesium sulfate prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Perioperative intravenous amiodarone does not reduce the burden of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery. Effect of amiodarone on atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Magnesium infusion and postoperative atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. Single-day loading dose of oral amiodarone for the prevention of new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. beta-Blockade therapy for supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary surgery: a propranolol withdrawal syndrome? Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery--a double blind randomized trial of prophylactic low dose propranolol. A comparison between oral antiarrhythmic drugs in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: the pilot study of prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (SPPAF), a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Magnesium infusion dramatically decreases the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Effect of single dose magnesium on arrhythmias in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Efficacy of low-dose propranolol in preventing postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a prospective, randomized study. Hemodynamic effects and safety of sotalol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Influence of external temporary biatrial pacing on the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass without extracorporeal circulation. Long-term amiodarone therapy and the risk of complications after cardiac surgery: results from the Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial (CAMIAT). The efficacy of supplemental magnesium in reducing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Postoperative oral amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery. Landiolol hydrochloride for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: new evidence from the PASCAL trial. Predictors, prevention, and long-term prognosis of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft operations. Oral sotalol reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Efficacy and safety of low-dose propranolol versus diltiazem in the prophylaxis of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting. Practical regimen for amiodarone use in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation. Effective prevention of atrial fibrillation by continuous atrial overdrive pacing after coronary artery bypass surgery. Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of supra-ventricular arrhythmias and pericardial effusion after coronary artery bypass grafting. Amiodarone versus digoxin and metoprolol combination for the prevention of postcoronary bypass atrial fibrillation. Magnesium sulfate prophylaxis after cardiac operations. Beta blockade to prevent atrial dysrhythmias following coronary bypass surgery. Arrhythmia prophylaxis after coronary artery bypass grafting: regimens of magnesium sulfate administration. Effects of posterior pericardiotomy on the incidence of pericardial effusion and atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization. Effects of posterior pericardiotomy on the incidence of atrial fibrillation and chest drainage after coronary revascularization: a prospective randomized trial. Intravenous amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: the Amiodarone Reduction in Coronary Heart (ARCH) trial. Correction of ionized plasma magnesium during cardiopulmonary bypass reduces the risk of postoperative cardiac arrhythmia. Atrial pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiovascular surgery. Incidence and prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery. Effectiveness of metoprolol in preventing atrial fibrillation and flutter in the postoperative period of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Magnesium substitution and postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Prevention and treatment of supraventricular tachycardia shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized open trial. Combination of sotalol and magnesium prevents atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Perioperative magnesium supplementation to prevent atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery surgery: a randomized controlled study. The effect of preoperative digitalis and atenolol combination on postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence. Amiodarone reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. A beta-blocker, not magnesium, is effective prophylaxis for atrial tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Oral d,l sotalol reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of prophylactic metoprolol for reduction of hospital length of stay after heart surgery: the beta-Blocker Length Of Stay (BLOS) study. Oral amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery, the Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial (AFIST): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Electrocardiographic and antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous amiodarone: results of a prospective, placebo-controlled study. Effects of low dose propranolol after coronary bypass surgery. [Efficacy of metoprolol in prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting]. Prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after open heart operation by low-dose sotalol: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Preoperative beta-blocker use reduces atrial fibrillation in off-pump coronary bypass surgery. Atenolol for the prevention of arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass grafting. Prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac valvular surgery by epicardial, biatrial synchronous pacing. The value of P dispersion on predicting atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: effect of magnesium on P dispersion. Arrhythmia prophylaxis after aorta-coronary bypass. The effect of minidose propranolol. Randomized controlled study investigating the effect of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Pacing of Bachmann's bundle after coronary artery bypass grafting. Prophylactic Oral Amiodarone for the Prevention of Arrhythmias that Begin Early After Revascularization, Valve Replacement, or Repair: PAPABEAR: a randomized controlled trial. Effects of amiodarone and thoracic epidural analgesia on atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Prevention of atrial fibrillation with moderate doses of amiodarone in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery is safe and effective in patients with high risk for developing this arrhythmia. Effects of biatrial pacing in prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Low-dose amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients older than 70 years. Intraoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after coronary operations. Prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation with magnesium sulfate after coronary artery bypass grafting. Prophylaxis of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting with low-dose sotalol. Biatrial pacing vs. intravenous amiodarone in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Role of biatrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. The role of posterior pericardiotomy on the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization. Amiodarone prophylaxis for tachycardias after coronary artery surgery: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. The influence of intravenous magnesium sulphate on the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery by-pass operation. Efficacy and safety of timolol for prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. Prophylactic oral amiodarone compared with placebo for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Effect of low-dose amiodarone and magnesium combination on atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting via atrial electromechanical interval and use of amiodarone prophylaxis. Temporary atrial pacing in the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation. Effectiveness of triple-site triggered atrial pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Effectiveness of sotalol in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting. Prevention by acebutolol of rhythm disorders following coronary bypass surgery. Effect of temporary right atrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Prophylactic magnesium sulphate vs. lidocaine during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Effect of posterior pericardiotomy on postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias and late pericardial effusion (posterior pericardiotomy). Intravenous amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Influence of propranolol on supraventricular tachycardia early after coronary artery revascularization. A randomized trial. Beta-blocker effects on postoperative atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation of high-risk patients after coronary bypass grafting: a prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study. Right atrial overdrive pacing does not prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. A comparison of two individual amiodarone regimens to placebo in open heart surgery patients. Intravenous plus oral amiodarone, atrial septal pacing, or both strategies to prevent post-cardiothoracic surgery atrial fibrillation: the Atrial Fibrillation Suppression Trial II (AFIST II). Intravenous and oral amiodarone for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Intravenous amiodarone or magnesium sulphate is not cost-beneficial prophylaxis for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia with low-dose propranolol after coronary bypass. Ineffectiveness and potential proarrhythmia of atrial pacing for atrial fibrillation prevention after coronary artery bypass grafting. Posterior pericardiotomy reduces the incidence of supra-ventricular arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass surgery. Effectiveness of bi-atrial pacing for reducing atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Evaluation of right atrial and biatrial temporary pacing for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: predictors and the role of MgSO4 replacement. Effect of Sotalol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting. Continued propranolol administration following coronary bypass surgery. Antiarrhythmic effects. Magnesium-supplemented warm blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization. Efficacy of nadolol in preventing supraventricular tachycardia after coronary artery bypass grafting. Epicardial, biatrial synchronous pacing for prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Arrhythmia prophylaxis using propranolol after coronary artery surgery. Significance of Supraventricular Tachyarrhythmias After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and Their Prevention by Low-Dose Sotalol: A Prospective Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study. Evaluation of bachmann bundle pacing versus right atrial pacing in prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Magnesium administration and dysrhythmias after cardiac surgery. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial. Prevention of atrial fibrillation or flutter by acebutolol after coronary bypass grafting. Propranolol for prevention of postoperative cardiac arrhythmias: a randomized study. Magnesium and arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass surgery. The use of atenolol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias following coronary artery surgery. Arrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery.
Atrial fibrillation is a rhythm disorder commonly seen early after coronary artery bypass grafting, and it increases morbidity.
                To investigate the effectiveness of magnesium sulfate in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation, we conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study on 200 consecutive patients in whom we performed elective and initial coronary artery bypass grafting operations. In each group 50% of patients underwent beating-heart operations. In the treatment group 100 patients (76 men and 24 women; mean age, 57.63 +/- 9.68 years) received 24.34 mEq (3 g) of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline solution that was administered over 2 hours (50 mL/h) preoperatively, perioperatively, and at postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3. In the control group 100 patients (74 men and 26 women; mean age, 59.96 +/- 9.29 years) received only 100 mL of saline solution according to the same administration schedule as the treatment group.
                Atrial fibrillation developed in 15 patients from the treatment group and in 16 patients from the control group. The arrhythmia developed after 37.87 +/- 12.76 and 45.26 +/- 15.27 hours in the treatment and control groups, respectively. Although a significant relationship was found between low magnesium sulfate levels and increased incidence of atrial fibrillation (P <.05), when the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation is concerned, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (P >.05). Also, no significant difference was found between operations with cardiopulmonary bypass and beating-heart operations in terms of atrial fibrillation incidence (P >.05). However, atrial fibrillation extended the duration of hospital stay in both groups (P <.05).
                Our findings indicate that magnesium sulfate infusion alone is not sufficient for the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation is a common complication after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation is associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality, and, therefore, preventive strategies using oral amiodarone have been developed but are often unpractical. Intravenous amiodarone administered after the induction of anesthesia and continued postoperatively for 48 h could represent an effective strategy to prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery.
                Single-center, double-blinded, double-dummy, randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing valvular surgery. Patients received either an intravenous loading dose of 300 mg of amiodarone or placebo in the operating room, followed by a perfusion of 15 mg . kg(-1) . 24 h(-1) for 2 days. The primary endpoint was the development of atrial fibrillation occurring at any time within the postoperative period.
                One hundred twenty patients were randomly assigned (mean age was 65 +/- 11 yr). Overall atrial fibrillation occurred more frequently in the perioperative intravenous amiodarone group compared with the placebo group (59.3 vs. 40.0%; P = 0.035). Four preoperative factors were found to be independently associated with a higher risk of developing postoperative atrial fibrillation: older age (P = 0.0003), recent myocardial infarction (<6 months; P = 0.026), preoperative angina (P = 0.0326), and use of a calcium channel blocker preoperatively (P = 0.0078) when controlling for groups.
                In patients undergoing cardiac valvular surgery, a strategy using intravenous amiodarone for 48 h is not efficacious in reducing the risk of atrial fibrillation during cardiac valvular surgery. Atrial fibrillation occurs in 10% 40% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. This study investigates whether prophylactic Amiodarone use reduces the rate of atrial fibrillation post myocardial revascularisation.
                In a prospective study conducted at the Cardiothoracic Center over a 6 month period, 192 patients were randomized to either Amiodarone or placebo. The Amiodarone group received Amiodarone infusion followed by oral Amiodarone on a decreasing dose for a total period of 6 weeks. The placebo group were started on an infusion of dextrose 5% solution and then maintained on a matched regimen of placebo tablets for a corresponding period of time.
                Of the 100 patients recruited for the Amiodarone arm of the study, 12 were excluded for a variety of reasons detailed in the discussion with atrial fibrillation occurring in 28 (a rate of 32%). Of the 92 controls, 32 developed atrial fibrillation (a rate of 35%). There were no significant differences between the groups. The maximum ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation however, was significantly slower in the Amiodarone group (108+/-18) compared to (136+/-22) P<0.05. Moreover, there were no significant differences in the mortality rates between the 2 groups; a rate of 3% (3 of 88) in the Amiodarone group as opposed to 3% (3 of 92) in the controls.
                In this study prophylactic Amiodarone did not reduce the rate of atrial fibrillation post coronary artery bypass surgery. However, it reduced the maximum ventricular rate. Amiodarone had no effect on mortality post coronary artery bypass. Postoperative arrhythmias are among the most common complications of cardiac surgery. Total serum magnesium concentration will change after coronary bypass surgery but compensatory prophylactic administration of magnesium has remained a controversial issue. We studied whether prophylactic administration of magnesium could prevent post-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) arrhythmias and evaluated the effects of diabetes mellitus on prophylactic magnesium administration.
                In a clinical trial, 345 consecutive CABG candidates were randomly assigned to study (n = 166, 48.1%) and control groups. Patients in study group received supplemental magnesium infusion as following: 2 g [corrected] after induction of anesthesia until cardio-pulmonary bypass and then 8 g upon arrival in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) until 24 hr. Total serum magnesium concentration was measured at four designated time points: onset of induction, and 0, 24 and 48 hr after ICU admission. Cardiac arrhythmias were sought with a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) from the end of surgery up till discharge.
                Atrial Fibrillation (Af) occurred in 34 patients (9.9%). Total serum magnesium concentration was significantly higher in patients who received supplemental magnesium (P < 0.001) and significantly lower in Af patients (P= 0.02). Among non-diabetics, Af incidence was significantly lower in study group compared with control group.
                The occurrence of atrial fibrillation correlates with serum magnesium level. Diabetes mellitus probably hampers prophylactic effect of supplemental magnesium in preventing the occurrence of Af. Various regimens have been proposed for the prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation, including the use of intravenous and oral amiodarone. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a single-day loading dose of oral amiodarone in prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation during the 7 days after coronary artery bypass surgery.
                We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study encompassing 315 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. They received either amiodarone (159 patients) or placebo (156 patients). Therapy consisted of a single oral loading dose of 1200 mg of amiodarone 1 day before surgery, followed by the maintenance dose of 200 mg daily during the next 7 days. Only episodes of atrial fibrillation lasting more than 1 hour or associated with hemodynamic compromise were taken into consideration.
                Overall, the incidence of atrial fibrillation was similar in patients who received amiodarone (31/159, 19.5%) and placebo (33/156, 21.2%) (P = .78). However, amiodarone reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation in elderly patients (age > or = 60 years): it occurred in 20 of 75 (26.7%) patients on amiodarone and in 28 of 65 (43.1%) patients in the placebo group (P = .05). There were no differences between the study groups regarding the postoperative intrahospital morbidity and mortality and the duration of hospital stay.
                A single-day loading dose of oral amiodarone (1200 mg) does not prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation in a general population of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. However, it appears that this regimen reduces the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in elderly patients. A high incidence of cardiac arrhythmias and hypertension has been noted after coronary artery bypass surgery in patients previously treated with oral propranolol. Forty-two patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery had propranolol withdrawal 10 hours before surgery and were randomized into a group treated with propranolol immediately postoperatively, and a nontreatment group. Patients treated with prophylactic propranolol had a significantly lower incidence of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias compared to patints who received no prophylaxis. All the arrhythmias responded rapidly to 1 mg of intravenous propranolol therapy, whether it was used as a primary treatment or as a supplement to prophylactic propranolol. The findings suggest that (1) there is a high incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias and sinus tachycardia after coronary artery bypass which might reflect an abrupt propranolol withdrawal, and (2) that perioperative prophylactic or supplementary propranolol therapy will successfully prevent or treat most of these arrhythmias. In the present study 75 patients were double blind randomized either to receive 10 mg propranolol orally 4 times a day (35 patients) or a placebo (40 patients). Episodes of clinically important supraventricular tachyarrhythmias were recorded in the first 4 postoperative days. They appeared in 5 of 35 patients receiving propranolol and in 5 of 40 patients receiving placebo (no statistically significant difference). In conclusion this study indicates the need for further evaluation to clarify if low-dose propranolol or any other drug is effective in reducing the frequency of SVT in the early postoperative period after coronary artery bypass surgery. Atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently occurs after cardiac surgical procedures, and beta-blockers, sotalol, and amiodarone may reduce the frequency of AF after open heart surgery. This pilot trial was designed to test whether each of the active oral drug regimens is superior to placebo for prevention of postoperative AF and whether there are differences in favor of 1 of the preventive strategies.
                We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the absence of heart failure and without significant left ventricular dysfunction (n = 253; average age, 65 +/- 11 years) received oral amiodarone plus metoprolol (n = 63), metoprolol alone (n = 62), sotalol (n = 63), or placebo (n = 65). Patients receiving combination therapy (amiodarone plus metoprolol) and those receiving sotalol had a significantly lower frequency of AF (30.2% and 31.7%; absolute difference, 23.6% and 22.1%; odds ratios [OR], 0.37 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.77, P <.01 vs placebo] and 0.40 [0.19 to 0.82, P =.01 vs placebo]) compared with patients receiving placebo (53.8%). Treatment with metoprolol was associated with a 13.5% absolute reduction of AF (P =.16; OR, 0.58 [0.29 to 1.17]. Treatment effects did not differ significantly between active drug groups. Adverse events including cerebrovascular accident, postoperative ventricular tachycardia, nausea, and dyspepsia, in hospital death, postoperative infections, and hypotension, were similar among the groups. Bradycardia necessitating dose reduction or drug withdrawal occurred in 3.1% (placebo), 3.2% (combined amiodarone and metoprolol; P =.65 vs placebo), 12.7% (sotalol; P <.05 vs placebo), and 16.1% (metoprolol; P <.05 vs placebo). Patients in the placebo group had a nonsignificantly longer length of hospital stay as compared with the active treatment groups (13.1 +/- 8.9 days vs 11.3 +/- 7; P =.10), with no significant difference between the active treatment groups.
                Oral active prophylaxis with either sotalol or amiodarone plus metoprolol may reduce the rate of AF after cardiac surgery in a population at high risk for postoperative AF. Treatment with metoprolol alone resulted in a trend to a lower risk for postoperative AF. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common complications of cardiac surgery. Magnesium, like several other pharmacologic agents, has been used in the prophylaxis of postoperative AF with varying degrees of success. However, the dose and the timing of magnesium prophylaxis need to be clarified. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of intermittent magnesium infusion on postoperative AF.
                A total of 200 consecutive patients who had elective, isolated, first-time coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively randomized to two groups. Patients in the magnesium group (n = 100) received 6 mmol MgSO4 infusion in 100 mL 0.9% NaCl solution (25 mL/h) the day before surgery, just after cardiopulmonary bypass, and once daily for 4 days after surgery. Patients in the control group (n = 100) received only 100 mL 0.9% NaCl solution (25 mL/h) at the same time points.
                Postoperative AF occurred in 2 (2%) patients in the magnesium group and in 21 (21%) patients in the control group (p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation started, on average, 49.4 +/- 16.8 hours postoperatively. The postoperative length of hospital stay was not significantly different in patients with AF (7.4 +/- 8.0 days) compared with patients without AF (5.4 +/- 1.1 days; p = 0.236).
                The use of magnesium in the preoperative and early postoperative periods is highly effective in reducing the incidence of AF after coronary artery bypass grafting. To evaluate the safety and role of prophylactic administration of magnesium in preventing arrhythmias.
                This double blind randomized placebo controlled clinical trial was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital on coronary artery bypass surgery patients. All patients were connected to holter monitor before induction of anaesthesia and this monitoring continued for 24 hours. Study drug containing either 2-grams of magnesium or normal saline was given after intubation. Levels of serum magnesium was checked preoperatively and then in ICU at 0, 6, 12, and 24 hours. Independent t-test and chi square test were used for analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p-value < 0.05.
                A total of 104 patients consented to participate in the study, 53 patients were randomly allocated in magnesium (Mg) group and 51 in placebo group. Two (3.77%) patients in magnesium group and five patients (9.8%) in placebo group developed atrial fibrillation. Incidence of ventricular and supraventricular tachycardia was also slightly higher in placebo. Mg level after arrival in CICU (Cardiac Intensive Care Unit) showed mean of 2.1 in magnesium group and 1.6 in placebo group (p = 0.6).
                Low magnesium levels were noticed in the placebo group after cardiopulmonary bypass and although prophylactic administration of magnesium sulphate was relatively safe but significant benefit on prevention of arrhythmias could not be attained. A prospective, randomized study was performed in 100 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery to assess the efficacy of the early reinstitution of propranolol in reducing the incidence of postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT). Patients were randomized to receive propranolol 10 mg every 6 hours enterally starting the morning after surgery (Group I, 50 patients) or to serve as controls (Group II, 50 patients). No patient was excluded because of poor ventricular function, need for urgent revascularization, or transient necessity for ionotropic support. Both groups had a comparable incidence of risk factors, previous infarction, unstable angina, and abnormal ventricular function. The extent of coronary disease, preoperative propranolol dose, and number of grafts performed were also similar. SVT occurred in 3/50 (6%) patients in Group I compared with 14/50 (28%) in Group II (p less than 0.01). There were no preoperative or intraoperative discriminators to predict the occurrence of SVT. In addition, perioperative infarction and the need for mechanical or pharmacologic circulatory support did not predispose to SVT. The data indicate that early administration of propranolol should be given to all patients after myocardial revascularization to decrease the incidence of these postoperative rhythm disturbances. Sotalol is a beta-adrenergic blocking drug with the additional property of lengthening the cardiac action potential. These electrophysiologic properties render the drug attractive for use in the prevention of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA), and previous studies have suggested that it was indeed effective. The hemodynamic response to sotalol and its safety early after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery were therefore studied. Forty-two patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned either to receive sotalol to prevent postoperative SVA (25 patients) or to serve as controls (17 patients). Sotalol was started 6 hours after surgery if patients had a cardiac index > 2.8 L/min/m2 with a pulmonary capillary wedge pressure < 15 mmHg, and if they had no contraindications to the use of beta-blockers. The drug was given as a loading infusion of 1 mg/kg over 2 hours, followed by a maintenance infusion of 0.15 mg/kg/h for 24 hours. Three hours later, patients received the first oral dose of 80 mg to be repeated every 8 or 12 hours. Adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug (bradycardia < 50 beats/min, systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, or cardiac index < 2.2 L/min/m2) occurred in six patients (24%) and were mainly related to the loading infusion. The hemodynamic data for patients who completed the study were characterized by a significant fall of the cardiac index caused by a lower heart rate without significant change of the stroke volume index. The incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias was not significantly different in the two groups (3/19 in the sotalol group, 5/17 in the control group).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Atrial fibrillation is the most common complication after myocardial revascularization, and it increases morbidity/mortality.
                The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to test the hypothesis that temporary biatrial pacing is effective in reducing the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation after myocardial revascularization.
                Ninety-eight non-consecutive patients who had undergone off-pump myocardial revascularization received two temporary electrodes attached to the right and left atria, which were connected to either pair of atrial pacemaker electrodes, in addition to the leads implanted in the right ventricle. Two groups of patients were randomized (control: 49 patients with no biatrial pacing; therapeutic: 49 patients with biatrial pacing). The variables of interest were atrial fibrillation (present or absent) and length of hospital stay.
                The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 36.73% in the control group and 14.29% in the therapeutic group (p=0.0194). Length of hospital stay was 7.00 +/- 2.82 days for patients with no atrial fibrillation (n=73) and 9.20 +/- 2.87 days for patients with atrial fibrillation (n=25) (p=0.0001). Age was an important predictor of arrhythmia and ranged between 62.34 +/- 9.00 years in the group with no atrial fibrillation and 67.20 +/- 7.42 years in the group with atrial fibrillation (p=0.0170).
                Compared to controls, prophylactic temporary biatrial pacing is effective in preventing atrial fibrillation. Hospital stay was longer for patients who developed postoperative atrial fibrillation, and age was an important predictor for the development of arrhythmia. This study was undertaken to determine the association between amiodarone therapy and risk of complications of cardiac surgery in patients in the randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial.
                Prospectively collected data regarding postoperative complications in 82 patients who underwent cardiac surgery during Canadian Amiodarone Myocardial Infarction Arrhythmia Trial participation were analyzed; 36 patients were randomly assigned to receive amiodarone and 46 were assigned to receive placebo. Of the patients randomly assigned to receive amiodarone, 24 patients continued amiodarone treatment to within 7 days of the operation (active amiodarone group) and 12 patients had the amiodarone discontinued at least 7 days before the operation (discontinued amiodarone group).
                The baseline characteristics of the three groups were similar. The risks of ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation, and respiratory complications were similar. The risk of requiring an intra-aortic balloon pump was significantly increased by amiodarone (34.8% vs 16.7% vs 8.7% for active amiodarone, discontinued amiodarone, and placebo groups, respectively, P =.024). There was no significant difference in the use of temporary pacing. Neither the mean duration of stay in the intensive care unit nor the 7- and 30-days mortalities were affected by amiodarone.
                Patients receiving long-term amiodarone treatment after myocardial infarction had a higher rate of intra-aortic balloon use after cardiac surgery. There was no increased risk of pulmonary complications, need for pacing, or death. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass is reported from 17% to 53%. Hypomagnesemia after this surgery is considered a contributing factor.
                Two hundred-two coronary bypass patients were randomized to magnesium (n = 105) or placebo (n = 97). The experimental group received 80-mg magnesium sulfate per kilogram ideal weight in 100 mL dextrose 5% water 30 minutes preoperatively. Postoperatively, patients received 8-mg magnesium sulfate per kilogram ideal weight intravenous per hour more than 48 hours. The control group received dextrose 5% water at these intervals.
                After the first bolus serum magnesium was experimental 4.75 mg/dL versus control 1.91 mg/dL, p less than 0.001, and remained different until postoperative day 4 (experimental 2.33 mg/dL vs control 2.26 mg/dL, p = 0.24). Atrial appendage and strap muscle were analyzed after the first bolus and after revascularization. There were no differences between groups in tissue magnesium or calcium. Urinary magnesium was elevated in the experimental (experimental 324.5 mg/24 hours, vs control 45.1 mg/24 hours, p = 0.01). Calcium excretion was higher (experimental 370 mg/24 hours vs control 186 mg/24 hours, p < 0.001) and was associated with lower serum calcium. Serum calcium was higher in the control through the fourth postoperative day. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was experimental 32 of 105 (30.5%) versus control 41 of 97 (42.3%) p = 0.08. Atrial fibrillation was different on the first postoperative day (experimental 3/105, 2.9% vs control 9/97, 9.3%), p = 0.05.
                Overall prophylactic magnesium supplementation does not significantly reduce atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. The only significant benefit of magnesium supplementation was on the first postoperative day. To assess the prophylactic effect of postoperative oral amiodarone on the incidence and severity of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery surgery.
                Prospective, randomized, blinded, controlled study.
                University hospital.
                Patients who had coronary artery surgery (n = 200).
                Patients in group 1 (n = 100) received oral amiodarone, 15 mg/kg, 4 hours after arrival in the intensive care unit, followed by 7 mg/kg/d until hospital discharge. Patients in group 2 (n = 100) received placebo.
                Incidence, duration, and recurrence of new episodes of AF and maximal ventricular rate response were recorded from day 0 until hospital discharge. Side effects related to amiodarone and complications induced by new-onset AF were noted. The incidence of new-onset AF (12% v 25%) and maximal ventricular rate response (120 +/- 21 beats/min v 135 +/- 24 beats/min) were significantly lower in the amiodarone group. There were no side effects related to the administration of amiodarone. The incidence of complications induced by AF was comparable between the 2 groups.
                Postoperative prophylactic oral amiodarone after coronary artery surgery is safe and effective in reducing the incidence of new-onset AF and maximal ventricular rate response.
                Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. Atrial fibrillation occurs commonly after open-heart surgery and may delay hospital discharge. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.
                In this double-blind, randomized study, 124 patients were given either oral amiodarone (64 patients) or placebo (60 patients) for a minimum of seven days before elective cardiac surgery. Therapy consisted of 600 mg of amiodarone per day for seven days, then 200 mg per day until the day of discharge from the hospital. The mean (+/-SD) preoperative total dose of amiodarone was 4.8+/-0.96 g over a period of 13+/-7 days.
                Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 16 of the 64 patients in the amiodarone group (25 percent) and 32 of the 60 patients in the placebo group (53 percent) (P=0.003). Patients in the amiodarone group were hospitalized for significantly fewer days than were patients in the placebo group (6.5+/-2.6 vs. 7.9+/-4.3 days, P=0.04). Nonfatal postoperative complications occurred in eight amiodarone-treated patients (12 percent) and in six patients receiving placebo (10 percent, P=0.78). Fatal postoperative complications occurred in three patients who received amiodarone (5 percent) and in two who received placebo (3 percent, P= 1.00). Total hospitalization costs were significantly less for the amiodarone group than for the placebo group ($18,375+/-$13,863 vs. $26,491+/-$23,837, P=0.03).
                Preoperative oral amiodarone in patients undergoing complex cardiac surgery is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and the duration and cost of hospitalization. Atrial fibrillation occurs frequently after cardiac surgery and not only prolongs hospitalization but also influences the prognosis. We investigated whether landiolol hydrochloride, an ultrashort-acting beta-blocker, could reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation in a randomized controlled trial.
                The subjects were 140 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at the Nihon University School of Medicine. The primary end point was occurrence/non-occurrence of atrial fibrillation up to 1 week postoperatively. Logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for atrial fibrillation among preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative variables.
                Atrial fibrillation occurred in 7 patients (10%) in the landiolol group versus 24 patients (34.3%) in the placebo group; the landiolol group had a significantly lower incidence (P = .0006). Postoperative heart rate was significantly lower in the landiolol group than in the placebo group. On returning to the intensive care unit, the landiolol group had significantly lower inflammatory and ischemic parameters. Medical costs were also significantly lower in the landiolol group. Multivariate analysis revealed that significant risk factors for atrial fibrillation were a European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation of 10 or more, preoperative non-use of angiotensin receptor blockers, and non-use of landiolol.
                Postoperative atrial fibrillation was reduced by treatment with landiolol hydrochloride. Amelioration of ischemia, an anti-inflammatory effect, and inhibition of sympathetic hypertonia by landiolol presumably reduced the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. Hypotension or bradycardia did not develop in any of the patients, indicating the safety of this beta-blocker. These findings suggest that landiolol hydrochloride could be useful in the perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
                Copyright © 2011 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. Multiple trials have suggested the use of digoxin, digoxin and propranolol, or timolol to prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. No trial has evaluated the efficacy of digoxin verus propranolol. Furthermore, the predictors of postoperative atrial fibrillation and the long-term consequence of atrial fibrillation that reverts to sinus rhythm have not been established. One hundred fifty patients were randomized to receive no drug, propranolol (20 mg every 6 hours), or digoxin (0.5 mg followed by 0.25 mg daily). Twenty-seven patients were excluded from data analysis. In the remaining 123 patients, no preoperative parameter (age, sex, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, electrocardiographic p wave morphology, or preoperative digoxin or propranolol therapy), intraoperative parameter (bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, or number of vessels bypassed), or postoperative parameter (peak creatinine kinase, congestive heart failure, or pericarditis) by univariate or multivariate analysis predicted patients at risk for atrial fibrillation. Sustained atrial fibrillation developed in 37.5% of control and 32.6% of digoxin-treated patients. Only 16.2% of propranolol-treated patients had sustained atrial fibrillation (p less than 0.03). There were no in-hospital complications in those patients with atrial fibrillation. After 26 +/- 7 months follow-up, those patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation had no increased incidence of angina, cerebral vascular accident, myocardial infarction, or sudden death. Therefore, in this select population, propranolol prophylaxis is effective but discretionary. Episodes of atrial fibrillation or flutter frequently complicate the postoperative course after coronary bypass surgery. A hundred and one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized to oral pre- and postoperative treatment with sotalol, a non-selective beta-blocking agent with class-III antiarrhythmic properties (50 patients), or to half the preoperative beta-blocking dose according to the routine of the department (51 patients). Thus, there was no equipotency regarding beta blockade in the two groups. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was 10% in the sotalol group and 29% in the comparison group, p = 0.028. In 10% of the sotalol patients the dose had to be reduced or stopped compared to in none the group given routine treatment. The patients who developed atrial fibrillation were older, but otherwise there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Sotalol was effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation. However, careful titration of the optimal dose should be performed in order to avoid side effects of the beta blockade. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVT) complicate postoperative management after coronary bypass surgery in about 30% of all patients. Though a prophylactic treatment both with beta-adrenergic blocking agents and the calcium antagonist diltiazem has been used for the prevention of post-operative SVT, no study yet has performed a prospective comparison of the efficacy of these therapies.
                To investigate the prophylactic effect of either a calcium antagonist (diltiazem, 0.1 mg/kg per h i.v.) or a beta-adrenergic blocking agent (propranolol, 10 mg every 6 h postoperatively), we randomized prospectively 103 consecutive patients into three groups, the third one serving as a control group. Anti-arrhythmic medication was started with the procedure and was continued until the 3rd postoperative day.
                Preoperative conditions were the same for the three groups concerning age, extent of coronary heart disease, ventricular function and heart-related medication. There were no differences in intraoperative parameters or postoperative enzyme patterns. Diltiazem was ineffective in preventing SVT, the incidence being exactly the same as in the control group (35%). Propranolol reduced the occurrence of SVT significantly (7%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, patients treated with diltiazem needed positive inotropic support more often in the first hours after surgery than patients of the control group (30% vs 5%, P < 0.01).
                The perioperative administration of low-dose propranolol is considered a safe and effective drug prophylaxis to avoid the occurrence of SVT after bypass surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 5% to 65% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Although postoperative atrial fibrillation is often regarded as a temporary, benign, operation-related problem, it is associated with a twofold to threefold increase in risk of adverse events, including permanent or transient stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and death.
                This randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial included 250 eligible consecutively enrolled patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). They received 300 mg of amiodarone/placebo administered intravenously over 20 minutes on the first postoperative day and an oral dose of 600 mg of amiodarone or placebo twice daily for the first 5 postoperative days.
                The patients in amiodarone prophylaxis experienced a reduction in risk of atrial fibrillation of 14% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0% to 24%), with the number needed to treat at 6.9 (95% CI, 4.2 to 20), and the results for symptomatic atrial fibrillation showed a risk reduction of 18% (95% CI, 9.4% to 26), with the number needed to treat at 5.7 (95% CI, 3.9 to 11). Of the patients who developed atrial fibrillation in the placebo group, 84% experienced a symptomatic attack versus only 43% in the amiodarone group.
                Postoperative prophylaxis with a high dose of oral amiodarone after an intravenous bolus infusion is a safe, practical, feasible, and effective regimen for CABG patients. It significantly diminishes the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation. The present study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a specific algorithm with continuous atrial dynamic overdrive pacing to prevent atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                Atrial fibrillation occurs in 30% to 40% of patients after cardiac surgery with a peak incidence on the second day. It still represents a challenge for postoperative prevention and treatment and may have medical and cost implications.
                Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing CABG for severe coronary artery disease and in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy on the second postoperative day were randomized to have or not 24 h of atrial pacing through temporary epicardial wires using a permanent dynamic overdrive algorithm. Holter ECGs recorded the same day in both groups were analyzed to detect AF occurrence.
                No difference was observed in baseline data between the two study groups, particularly for age, male gender, history of AF, ventricular function, severity of coronary artery disease, preoperative beta-adrenergic blocking agent therapy or P-wave duration. The incidence of AF was significantly lower (p = 0.036) in the paced group (10%) compared with control subjects (27%). Multivariate analysis showed AF incidence to increase with age (p = 0.051) but not in patients with pacing (p = 0.078). It decreased with a better left ventricular ejection fraction only in conjunction with atrial pacing (p = 0.018).
                We conclude that continuous atrial pacing with an algorithm for dynamic overdrive reduces significantly incidence of AF the second day after CABG surgery, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular function. The aim of this prospective study was to demonstrate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy in reducing the incidence pericardial effusions and consequently reducing the related supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions.
                This prospective randomized study was carried out in 150 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting in Bayindir Hospital Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between April 2000 and October 2001. One hundred and fifty patients were divided into two groups; each group included 75 patients. A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in posterior pericardiotomy group (group I). Posterior pericardiotomy was not performed in conventional treatment group (group II).
                Atrial fibrillation was developed in seven patients (9.3%) in group I and in 24 patients (32%) in group II (P<0.001). Atrial flutter and other supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) prevalence was not statistically significant. Early pericardial effusion was developed 42.6% (32/75) and 10.6% (8/75), respectively, in group II and group I (P<0.0001), but no late pericardial effusion developed in group I despite seven (9.3%) late pericardial effusions developing in group II (P<0.013).
                Posterior pericardiotomy is a simple, safe and effective technique for reducing not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related atrial fibrillation but also delayed posterior pericardial effusion and tamponade. This prospective randomized study aims at evaluation and comparison of the prophylactic effects of amiodarone versus digoxin and metoprolol combination in postcoronary bypass atrial fibrillation.
                A total of 241 consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly allocated into three groups. Patients in Group1 (n=77) received metoprolol 100 mg/24 h per oral (P.O.), preoperatively, 2x0.5 mg digoxin intravenously on the operating day and digoxin 0.25 mg P.O.+metoprolol 100 mg P.O. on the first postoperative day until discharge. Patients in Group 2 (n=72) received totally 1200 mg intravenous/24 h amiodarone which the 300 mg - bolus dose/1 h was given as soon as the operation had been finished. On the next day patients were administered 450 mg/24 h amiodarone i.v. and 600 mg/day in three doses P.O. were given until discharge. Group 3 (n=92) was the control group with no antiarrhythmic prophylaxis.
                Preoperative patient characteristics and operative parameters were similar in three groups. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 13 patients (16.8%) in Group 1, six patients (8.3%) in Group 2 and 31 patients (33.6%) in Group 3.
                Both study groups were effective in the prevention of postcoronary bypass atrial fibrillation with respect to control (P<0.01 in Group 1 and P<0.001 in Group 2). One hundred patients undergoing elective cardiac operations were randomized into placebo (n = 54) and magnesium (n = 46) groups. The magnesium group received six doses of 2.4 g (19.2 mEq) magnesium sulfate intravenously in the first 24 hours after the cardiac operation. The magnesium group had higher serum magnesium concentrations postoperatively (1.09 +/- 0.20 versus 0.75 +/- 0.13 mmol/L; p < 0.0001), postoperative day 1 (1.49 +/- 0.34 versus 0.70 +/- 0.12 mmol/L; p < 0.0001) and postoperative day 2 (0.96 +/- 0.19 versus 0.76 +/- 0.07 mmol/L; p < 0.0001). Patients in the magnesium group had a lower incidence of ventricular tachyarrythmias (VTs) (17.3% versus 51.9%; p = 0.0006), less need for treatment (6.5% versus 20.3%; p < 0.0001), fewer VT episodes/patient (0.3 +/- 0.8 versus 1.39 +/- 1.9; p < 0.0001), and a reduction in the severity of VTs as measured by the modified Lown grade (p = 0.0002). No differences were demonstrated with respect to supraventricular tachyarrythmias. The magnesium group had reduced absolute creatine kinase-MB levels (5.3 +/- 4.2 versus 28.4 +/- 28 IU/L; p = 0.001) as well as creatine kinase-MB fraction (0.01 +/- 0.02 versus 0.05 +/- 0.04; p = 0.001) on postoperative day 1. Serum magnesium concentrations were lower during VTs than during periods of sinus rhythm (0.75 +/- 0.75 versus 1.02 +/- 0.35 mmol/L; p < 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter (AF) frequently complicate coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and increase hospital stay as well as morbidity. Studies of drug prophylaxis to prevent AF with beta-adrenergic blocking agents administered in fixed doses have had conflicting results.
                One hundred patients were randomized to receive metoprolol or placebo following CABG. A dosing algorithm was used to achieve clinically significant beta-adrenergic blockade.
                There was no significant difference between the incidence of AF in the metoprolol (24%) and placebo (26%) groups. However, the incidence of AF in all patients having CABG at this institution declined over the period of the study from 31% to 23% (P < .025), in association with the adoption of a continuous technique of cardioplegia delivery.
                Metoprolol is not efficacious for the prevention of post-CABG AF even when dosage is titrated to achieve clinical evidence of beta blockade. It is likely that the adoption of a continuous cardioplegia technique caused a reduction in our incidence of post-CABG AF. Arrhythmias are common after open heart surgery and may be related to hypomagnesaemia due to cardiopulmonary bypass. Although perioperative prophylactic Mg2+ administration may prevent arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), clear indications as well as the timing of Mg2+ substitution and dose regimen need to be clarified. Aim of this study was to evaluate the antiarrhythmic effects of Mg2+ infusion in patients who underwent elective CABG.
                Ninety-seven patients who underwent elective CABG were divided in four Groups. In Group A 1 g of magnesium sulfate was added to the pump prime, Group B received 1 g in the pump prime plus 5 mmol/L in the cardioplegic solution, Group C received 5 mmol/L in the cardioplegic solution, and Group D was a placebo control Group. Groups A, B, and C also received 24 h continuous infusion of magnesium sulfate at 10 mmol/L. Three-channel electrocardiogram (II-V5-V6) continuous monitoring was performed 12 hours preoperatively and 48 hours postoperatively. Blood samples were taken for subsequent Serum magnesium measurements, at five different time points before, during and after CBP.
                In all Groups serum Mg2+ levels were reduced during CPB (Time 2) and statistically significant differences from pre-anaesthesia levels (Time 1) were noted (p <0.05). In Groups A, B, and C Serum Mg2+ levels increased progressively from Time 3 to Time 5; in Group D serum Mg2+ levels were still much lower at Time 5. Significant differences (p<0.05) were noted for Groups B and C vs Groups A and D in atrial ectopics, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular arrhythmic events.
                Our results demonstrate that Mg2+ sulfate administration regimens used in Group B and C reduce postoperative arrhythmic events in patients undergoing CABG. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to assess the efficacy of posterior pericardiotomy in decreasing the prevalence of pericardial effusion and postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                The study was performed in 100 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) between October 2003 and July 2005. They were randomized to receive posterior pericardiotomy (Group A) or no posterior pericardiotomy (Group B). A 4-cm longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in group A patients. Posterior pericardiotomy was not performed in group B patients.
                Early pericardial effusion developed in 6 patients (12%) of group A and 21 patients (42%) of group B; no late pericardial effusion developed in group A, but did in 3 patients (6%) of group B. The number of patients who developed postoperative AF was significantly lower in the fenestration group compared with the control group (10% vs. 30%, p < 0.010). The overall incidence of supraventricular tachycardia in patients with early pericardial effusion was significantly higher than in patients without early pericardial effusion (18 patients vs. 9 patients).
                These findings suggest that posterior pericardiotomy reduces the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related AF by improving pericardial drainage in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. nan This study was designed to test whether intravenous (i.v.) amiodarone would prevent atrial fibrillation and decrease hospital stay after open heart surgery.
                Atrial fibrillation commonly occurs after open heart procedures and is thought to be a significant determinant for prolongation of hospitalization. Oral amiodarone given preoperatively appears to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation. This study was designed to test whether the more rapid-acting i.v. formulation of amiodarone given postoperatively would reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation.
                Three hundred patients undergoing standard open heart surgery were randomized in a double-blind fashion to i.v. amiodarone (1 g/day for 2 days) versus placebo immediately after open heart surgery. The primary end points of the trial were incidence of atrial fibrillation and length of hospital stay. Baseline clinical variables and mortality and morbidity data were collected.
                Atrial fibrillation occurred in 67/142 (47%) patients on placebo versus 56/158 (35%) on amiodarone (p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay for the placebo group was 8.2 +/- 6.2 days, and 7.6 +/- 5.9 days for the amiodarone group (p = 0.34). No differences were noted in baseline variables, morbidity or mortality.
                Low-dose i.v. amiodarone was safe and effective in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation after heart surgery, but did not significantly alter length of hospital stay. We conducted this randomized controlled trial to determine whether the intraoperative measurement and correction of ionized plasma magnesium can reduce the risk of cardiac arrhythmia after cardiopulmonary bypass. Eighty-five patients presenting for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned either to the magnesium-corrected group, which received magnesium sulfate on the basis of measured levels of ionized plasma magnesium (n = 43), or to the control group, in which magnesium levels were identified but not corrected (n = 42). Ionized magnesium was determined with an ion-selective electrode with minimal delay, and further samples were taken for laboratory analysis of total plasma magnesium. All patients had Holter electrocardiogram monitoring for 72 h after surgery. Total hypomagnesemia (45 patients; 53% of all patients) was more common than ionized hypomagnesemia (11 patients; 13%) before cardiopulmonary bypass. Both total and ionized magnesium levels declined further during the course of cardiopulmonary bypass in the control group. The incidence of ventricular tachycardia in the first 24 h was less frequent in the magnesium-corrected group (3 patients; 7%) than the control group (12 patients, 30%; P < 0.01). Patients in the magnesium-corrected group were more likely to display continuous sinus rhythm (Lown Grade 0) in the first 24 h (14 patients; 34%) than patients in the control group (2 patients, 5%; P < 0.001). Our results suggest that the intraoperative correction of ionized magnesium is associated with a reduction in postoperative ventricular arrhythmia in cardiac surgical patients.
                In this study the correction of ionized plasma magnesium during cardiopulmonary bypass was guided by measurements from an ion-selective electrode. This intervention resulted in a reduction in the incidence of postoperative ventricular tachycardia and an increased frequency of continuous sinus rhythm. Ion-selective electrodes constitute a convenient near-patient test, providing a basis for the targeted replacement of ionized plasma magnesium. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of atrial pacing in the prevention of atrial fibrillation following cardiovascular surgery.
                Although pharmacologic therapy has been used to help prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation, it suffers from limited efficacy and adverse effects. In the nonoperative setting, novel pacing strategies have been shown to reduce recurrences of atrial fibrillation and prolong arrhythmia-free periods in patients with paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias.
                A total of 154 patients (115 men; mean age, 65 +/- 10 years; ejection fraction, 53 +/- 10%) undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass surgery, 88.3%; aortic valve replacement, 4.5%; coronary bypass + aortic valve replacement, 7.1%) had right and left atrial epicardial pacing electrodes placed at the time of surgery. Patients were randomized to either no pacing, right atrial (RAP), left atrial (LAP) or biatrial pacing (BAP) for 72 h after surgery. Beta-adrenergic blocking agents were administered concurrently to all patients following surgery.
                There was a reduction in the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation from 37.5% in patients receiving no postoperative pacing to 17% (p < 0.005) in patients assigned to one of the three pacing strategies. The length of hospital stay was reduced by 22% from 7.8 +/- 3.7 days to 6.1 +/- 2.3 days (p = 0.003) in patients assigned to postoperative atrial pacing. The incidence of atrial fibrillation was lower in each of the paced groups (RAP, 8%; LAP, 20%; BAP, 26%) compared with patients who did not receive postoperative pacing (37.5%).
                Postoperative atrial pacing, in conjunction with beta-blockade, significantly reduced both the incidence of atrial fibrillation and the length of hospital stay following cardiovascular surgery. Additional studies are needed to determine the most effective anatomic pacing site. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are a frequent complication encountered after coronary artery bypass grafting. A retrospective survey of 102 consecutive patients undergoing exclusive bypass grafting at St. Mary's Hospital supplemented by a review of 16 published reports over a period of 10 years revealed a mean incidence of post-operative tachyarrhythmia of 33.4% in 1344 patients (range 11.4-100%). One hundred and thirty two patients undergoing exclusive bypass surgery, were randomised prospectively in double blind fashion to receive either oral timolol or matched placebo approximately 24 hours after surgery. In the 66 patients receiving timolol, there was a significant reduction of post-operative arrhythmias compared to the 66 patients receiving placebo: from 19.7 to 7.5% (P less than 0.05). Of all arrhythmias, two thirds appeared under 48 hours after surgery. In the timolol group, 4 patients developed systemic hypotension. This was readily reversed by withdrawing the drug. No other side effects were noted. The use of oral timolol after coronary artery surgery significantly lowers the incidence of post-operative supraventricular arrhythmias. To assess the effectiveness of metoprolol in preventing clinically detectable atrial fibrillation (AF) and flutter after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                An open, randomized study was carried out to treat 200 patients who had undergone isolated CABG surgery with extracorporeal circulation. The patients were randomized to either receive metoprolol orally or not to receive the medication in the postoperative period. The outcomes were the detection of sustained atrial AF and flutter, which were symptomatic or required treatment. The patients with the following characteristics were excluded from the study: baseline left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%; previous AF; history of bronchospasm; second- and third-degree atrioventricular blocks, low cardiac output, and heart failure.
                Arrhythmias occurred in 11 out of 100 patients in the metoprolol group and in 24 out of 100 patients in the control group (P=0.02). The relative risk (RR) was 0.46 (95% CI = 0.24-0.88), and the number necessary to treat (NNT) and avoid the outcome was 8 patients. AF was the arrhythmia most frequently observed (30/35). In 38 patients aged 70 years or more, the arrhythmias occurred in 2 out of 19 patients in the metoprolol group and in 10 out of 19 patients in the control group (c2 Yates: P=0.01). The relative risk was 0.20 (95% CI = 0.05-0.79) and the number necessary to treat was 2 patients.
                Metoprolol is effective in preventing AF and flutter in the postoperative period of CABG surgery, and this effect was more evident in the group of elderly patients. Sixty coronary artery bypass grafting patients were randomized to receive either magnesium sulphate or placebo for 4 days postoperatively. The magnesium substitution reduced the duration of atrial fibrillation or flutter (p < 0.05), but not the number of patients developing these arrhythmias. The number of ventricular ectopic beats was also reduced among patients receiving magnesium sulphate compared to placebo (p < 0.05). To evaluate whether the anti-arrhythmic effect of magnesium sulphate was explained by a faster resumption of cellular potassium postoperatively, skeletal muscle electrolyte concentrations were measured pre-operatively and on the third day postoperatively. No significant difference was found in skeletal muscle potassium or magnesium contents on the third day postoperatively when comparing the two groups. The serum magnesium level declined postoperatively in the placebo group, whereas an increase was found in patients receiving magnesium sulphate. We suggest magnesium substitution as a routine postoperatively, because this treatment seems to reduce the severity of postoperative arrhythmias. Supraventricular arrhythmias continue to complicate the postoperative course of patients following coronary artery bypass grafting. In a randomized, open, controlled trial we assessed the value of two different beta-blocking agents in the prevention and treatment of these arrhythmias. Of 151 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery surgery, 39 were treated with metoprolol and 41 were treated with sotalol (a beta blocker with class III antiarrhythmic properties). Fifty patients served as a control group and received no prophylactic therapy. Twenty-one patients were eliminated from the study for various reasons, making a final total of 130 in the study group. In the metoprolol group 15.3% of patients developed supraventricular tachycardia SVT after coronary artery surgery, which was significantly less (p less than 0.05) than the incidence observed in the control group. However, in the group of patients receiving sotalol, 2.4% developed SVT (p less than 0.01 compared with the control group). Of 18 patients in the control group who developed SVT after randomization, 10 received sotalol and 4 metoprolol to terminate the arrhythmia. The mean time of termination of SVT after drug administration was 2.4 +/- 1.8 hours for treatment with sotalol and 13.6 +/- 9.8 hours for treatment with metoprolol. We conclude that sotalol significantly reduces the incidence of supraventricular tachycardia in the early period after coronary artery bypass surgery. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication reported in 20% to 40% of patients after coronary operations. Sotalol alone and magnesium alone have been shown to partially decrease the incidence of AF. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of these two pharmacological agents, used alone or in combination, to reduce postoperative AF.
                Two hundred seven consecutive coronary artery bypass patients (mean age 62 +/- 11 years) were randomized to receive sotalol alone (80 mg twice daily for 5 days starting from the morning of the first postoperative day) (group S), magnesium alone (1.5 g daily for 6 days starting in the operating room just before cardiopulmonary bypass) (group M), both pharmacologic agents at the same dosages (group S+M), or no antiarrhythmic agents (group CTR). All patients with an ejection fraction less than 0.40 were excluded.
                The incidence of postoperative AF was 11.8% (6/51) in the S group, 14.8% (8/54) in the M group, 1.9% (1/52) in the S+M group, and 38% (19/50) in the CTR group. The following differences were significant: group CTR versus groups S, M, and S+M with values of p = 0.002, p = 0.007 and p < 0.0001, respectively; and group S+M versus groups S and M with p = 0.04 and p = 0.01, respectively.
                Incidence of AF after coronary operation was significantly reduced by the administration of sotalol alone and magnesium alone; more importantly, the incidence was further reduced by combining these agents. Atrial fibrillation is a common complication after cardiac surgery. Magnesium is an effective and safe antiarrhythmic agent for arrhythmias that develop after cardiac surgery. The authors performed a study to evaluate the role of perioperative magnesium for prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery surgery.
                Randomized controlled study.
                University teaching hospital.
                One hundred sixty consecutive patients undergoing elective, isolated, off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively randomized into 2 groups.
                Patients in the magnesium group (n = 80) received a 2.5-g (20 mEq) magnesium sulphate infusion intraoperatively over 30 minutes, and the placebo group (n = 80) received normal saline solution.
                Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 16 of 80 patients (20%) in the magnesium group and in 18 of 80 (22.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.9).
                The use of 2.5 g of intraoperative magnesium showed no effect in preventing atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass. The most frequent arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass surgery is atrial fibrillation (AF). The prevention and treatment of this type of arrhythmia is subobtimal. Digitalis, beta-blockers, diltiazem and amiodarone are the preferred drugs for the treatment. This study was designed to compare the effects of preoperatively started digitalis and atenolol in combination and separately, on the incidence of AF that occurs within 7 days following the operation.
                One-hundred and sixty patients who had similar demographic properties were randomly grouped as group I, that preoperatively received combined drug therapy (n=40), group II preoperatively used digitalis (n=40), group III atenolol (n=40), and group IV was the control group (n=40).
                Postoperative AF incidence was 25, 15,4, and 17,9% in groups IV, III, and II, respectively, whereas it was 5% in group I which was lower than all other groups, but the difference was only significant between groups I and IV (P=0.012).
                The combined use of atenolol and digitalis preoperatively was considered as an efficient treatment for lowering the incidence of AF following coronary artery bypass surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of postoperative administration of prophylactic amiodarone in the prevention of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
                In this prospective study 157 patients were randomly divided into two groups: 77 patients (amiodarone group) received intravenous amiodarone in a dose of 10 mg/kg/d for postoperative 48 hours. On postoperative day 2 oral amiodarone was started with a dose of 600 mg/d for 5 days, 400 mg/d for the following 5 days, and 200 mg/d for 20 days, and 80 patients received placebo (control group).
                Preoperative patient characteristics and operative variables were similar in the two groups. Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 8 patients (10.4%) receiving amiodarone and in 20 (25.0%) patients receiving placebo (P =.017). Duration of atrial fibrillation was 12.8 +/- 4.8 hours for the amiodarone group compared with 34.7 +/- 28.7 hours for the control group (P =.003). The maximum ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation was slower in the amiodarone group than in the control group (105.9 +/- 19.1 beats per minute and 126.0 +/- 18.5 beats per minute, respectively, P =.016). The two groups had a similar incidence of complication other than rhythm disturbances (20.8% vs 20.0%, P =.904). Amiodarone group patients had shorter hospital stays than that of control group patients (6.8 +/- 1.7 days vs 7.8 +/- 2.9 days, P =.014). The in-hospital mortality was not different between two groups (1.3% vs 3.8, P =.620).
                Postoperative intravenous amiodarone, followed by oral amiodarone, appears to be effective in the prevention of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. It also reduces ventricular rate and duration of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. It is well tolerated and decreases the length of hospital stay. To evaluate magnesium as a sole or adjuvant agent with currently used prophylactic drugs in suppressing postoperative atrial tachyarrhythmias (POAT) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                Single-center prospective, randomized clinical trial.
                University hospital.
                Patients (n = 400) undergoing CABG surgery.
                Patients were randomized among 6 prophylaxis regimens: (1) control (no antiarrhythmics), (2) magnesium only, (3) digoxin only, (4) magnesium and digoxin, (5) propranolol only, and (6) magnesium and propranolol. Patients randomized to a regimen including magnesium received 12 g given during 96 hours postoperatively. Patients in a digoxin regimen received 1 mg after cardiopulmonary bypass and 0.25 mg daily. Patients in a propranolol regimen received 1 mg intravenously every 6 hours until able to take 10 mg orally 4 times a day. Prophylaxis regimens were discontinued after 4 days postoperatively.
                The primary outcome was a sustained POAT or discharge from the hospital. Control patients had an incidence of POAT (38%) not significantly different from patients in magnesium-only (38%), digoxin-only (31%), and magnesium with digoxin (37%) regimens. Patients treated with propranolol had a significant reduction in POAT. Nearly identical POAT rates in the propranolol-only (18%) and propranolol with magnesium (19%) groups support the lack of efficacy of magnesium in this trial. Study design allowed analysis of and showed a beta-blocker withdrawal effect in addition to suppressive benefit of postoperative beta-blockers.
                beta-Blocker prophylaxis is indicated to reduce the incidence of POAT in CABG surgery patients and to prevent a beta-blocker withdrawal effect in patients receiving these medications preoperatively. Digoxin and magnesium as sole or adjuvant agents do not offer suppressive or ventricular rate reduction benefits in POAT.
                Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company The purpose of this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to assess the efficacy of preoperatively and postoperatively administered oral d,l sotalol in preventing the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia following coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Its etiology, prevention and treatment remain highly controversial. Furthermore, its associated morbidity results in a prolongation of the length of hospital stay post-CABG.
                A total of 85 patients, of which 73 were to undergo CABG and 12 CABG plus valvular surgery (ejection fraction > or = 28% and absence of clinical heart failure), were randomized to receive either sotalol (40 patients; mean dose = 190 +/- 43 mg/day) started 24 to 48 h before open heart surgery and continued for four days postoperatively, or placebo (45 patients, mean dose = 176 +/- 32 mg/day).
                Atrial fibrillation occurred in a total of 22/85 (26%) patients. The incidence of postoperative AF was significantly (p = 0.008) lower in patients on sotalol (12.5%) as compared with placebo (38%). Significant bradycardia/hypotension, necessitating drug withdrawal, occurred in 2 of 40 (5%) patients on sotalol and none in the placebo group (p = 0.2). None of the patients on sotalol developed Torsade de pointes or sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Postoperative mortality was not significantly different in sotalol versus placebo (0% vs. 2%, p = 1.0). Patients in the sotalol group had a nonsignificantly shorter length of hospital stay as compared with placebo (7 +/- 2 days vs. 8 +/- 4 days; p = 0.24).
                The administration of sotalol, in dosages ranging from 80 to 120 mg, was associated with a significant decrease (67%) in postoperative AF in patients undergoing CABG without appreciable side effects. Sotalol should be considered for the prevention of postoperative AF in patients undergoing CABG in the absence of heart failure and significant left ventricular dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication of heart surgery. Previous studies have shown that there is an association between postoperative AF and prolongation of hospital length of stay. No previous trials have been primarily directed at demonstrating that the use of drugs that prevent AF would shorten length of stay and reduce the costs of postoperative care.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of metoprolol was performed in patients immediately after nonemergent heart surgery. Metoprolol was given orally at a dose of 100 mg per day after the patient's arrival in the intensive care unit until hospital discharge or 14 days, whichever was sooner. This dose was increased to 150 mg per day after the enrollment of 411 patients. The primary outcome measure of the study was hospital length of stay from admission to intensive care unit until hospital discharge. There were 1000 patients enrolled, evenly distributed to the metoprolol and placebo groups.
                There was a 20% reduction in the risk of AF developing with metoprolol, from 39% of patients to 31% of patients (P =.01). There was no effect of treatment on hospital length of stay, which was 152 +/- 61 hours for placebo and 155 +/- 90 hours for metoprolol (P = 0.79). The cost of postoperative care in the 2 treatment groups was similar.
                Prophylactic metoprolol reduces the risk of AF after heart surgery. It does not reduce hospital length of stay. Although it is cost effective for the reduction of AF, it did not reduce the overall cost of care. Beta-blockers and amiodarone reduce the frequency of atrial fibrillation after open-heart surgery but the effectiveness of oral amiodarone in older patients already receiving beta-blockers is unknown. We have assessed the efficacy of oral amiodarone in preventing atrial fibrillation in patients aged 60 years or older undergoing open-heart surgery.
                We did a randomised, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in which patients undergoing open-heart surgery (n=220, average age 73 years) received amiodarone (n=120) or placebo (n=100). Patients enrolled less than 5 days before surgery received 6 g of amiodarone or placebo over 6 days beginning on preoperative day 1. Patients enrolled at least 5 days before surgery received 7 g over 10 days beginning on preoperative day 5.
                Patients on amiodarone had a lower frequency of any atrial fibrillation (22.5% vs 38.0%; p=0.01; absolute difference 15.5% [95% CI 3.4-27.6%]), and there were significant differences in favour of the active drug for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (4.2% vs 18.0%, p=0.001), cerebrovascular accident (1.7% vs 7.0%, p=0.04), and postoperative ventricular tachycardia (1.7% vs 7.0%, p=0.04). Beta-blocker use (87.5% amiodarone vs 91.0% placebo), nausea (26.7% vs 16.0%), 30-day mortality (3.3% vs 4.0%), symptomatic bradycardia (7.5% vs 7.0%), and hypotension (14.2% vs 10.0%) were similar.
                Oral amiodarone prophylaxis in combination with beta-blockers prevents atrial fibrillation and symptomatic fibrillation and reduces the risk of cerebrovascular accidents and ventricular tachycardia. The antiarrhythmic efficacy of intravenously administered amiodarone was examined in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study that involved 77 patients after coronary artery bypass surgery. Amiodarone was given after surgery in a loading bolus of 300 mg for 2 hours followed by 1200 mg every 24 hours for 2 days and 900 mg every 24 hours for the next 2 days. Amiodarone suppressed both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias within 12 hours after the start of therapy. Particularly, the incidence of atrial fibrillation (5% vs 21% in the control group; p less than 0.05) and of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (3% vs 16%; p less than 0.05) was reduced by amiodarone. Heart rate was slowed (p less than 0.001) and repolarization--as judged by JTc interval--was prolonged compared with the control group (p less than 0.01). In two patients, amiodarone infusion was stopped because of excessive QTc prolongation. No detrimental hemodynamic effects of the drug were observed. Thus the intravenous administration of amiodarone appears to be suitable for patients in whom rapid suppression of symptomatic supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias is warranted in the presence of left ventricular dysfunction. This study was performed to record the occurrence of clinically important supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVA) during the first eight days following coronary bypass surgery after preoperative withdrawal of various betablockers and to investigate whether low dose propranolol medication postoperatively could reduce the occurrence of such arrhythmias. Forty patients with stable angina pectoris were postoperatively randomly assigned to either a group (B) receiving low doses of propranolol or to a group (A) not receiving this medication. The number of patients having episodes of clinically important SVA was recorded. Two out of sixteen patients in the propranolol group had such episodes compared with nine out of twenty without postoperative betablockade (p = 0.07). Thus among patients treated with various betablockers which were withdrawn prior to coronary surgery, the occurrence of postoperative clinically important SVA could not be significantly reduced by postoperative low dose propranolol administration. Atrial fibrillation is in 20-50% the most frequent dysrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and a possible cause for hemodynamical complications and prolongation off the medical treatment in patients. Therefore, the effect of beta-blocking with metoprolol for prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVA) was investigated in a prospective and randomized trial. 200 patients after CABG were randomized in a drug and control group (average age 63.2 years, 154 male, 46 female). Patients of the drug group (n=100) were treated with metoprolol (1mg/kg/BW) beginning on day one after operation, whereas patients of the control group (n=100) received therapy only in case of occurrence of atrial fibrillation. ECG, blood pressure, and electrolyte concentrations were measured regularly until the tenth day after surgery. Reasons for exclusion were an ejection fraction (< 30%, SA- and AV-block or simultaneous application of epinephrine and metoprolol. There were no significant differences between the patients of drug and control group with respect to age, sex ejection fraction, previous medication, number and type of bypass grafts, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and perioperative ischemic events. However, a statistically significant difference was seen in the occurrence of supraventricular arrhythmias in both groups, 4 patients of the therapy group (4%) in contrast to 37 patients of the control (37%) developed supraventricular arrhythmias during the postoperative observation period (p<0.0001). Both groups differed in total time of hospital stay by 1.5 days (control group: 9.83+/-2.88 days; drug group: 8.42+/-2.81 days), which was statistically significant (p<0.05). All patients of the drug group could be discharged with a stable sinus rhythm, whereas 7 patients of the control group were discharged with persistent atrial fibrillation. The difference was statistically significant as well (p<0.01). Neither typical side effects of metoprolol, nor AV-blocks, bradycardia (f<60/min) or symptoms of low blood pressure could be observed. The conclusion of this trial is a recommendation for a preventive application of 50mg metoprolol/day after coronary artery bypass surgery, which can reduce the incidence of SVA as well as the hospital stay statistically significant. The aim of this prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to assess the preventive effect and safety of low-dose sotalol after heart operation.
                Two hundred fifty-five consecutive patients referred for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 220) or aortic valve operation (n = 35) were randomized to receive either 80 mg of sotalol twice daily (n = 126) or matching placebo (n = 129) for 3 months, with the first dose given 2 hours before operation.
                There were no significant baseline differences between the groups. Overall, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred in 36% of patients (82% atrial fibrillation). Hospital stay was 11.6 +/- 5 days in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias, versus 9.5 +/- 2.4 days in patients without it (p < 0.0001). Low-dose sotalol reduced the rate of supraventricular arrhythmias from 46% (placebo) to 26% (sotalol; p = 0.0012), or by 43%. On the fourth postoperative day, heart rate was lower in the sotalol group (74 +/- 12 beats/min versus 85 +/- 15 beats/min; p < 0.0001) but the QT interval corrected for the heart rate was not prolonged (sotalol group, 0.44 +/- 0.03 second; placebo group, 0.43 +/- 0.03 second; p = not significant). Study medication had to be discontinued because of side effects in 5.6% of sotalol and 3.9% of placebo patients (p = not significant), with one possible proarrhythmic event occurring in a patient receiving sotalol.
                Because more than 90% of supraventricular arrhythmic episodes occurred within 9 days after operation and 70% of all possibly sotalol related side effects occurred after day 9, the findings in this study imply that prophylactic treatment with sotalol may be limited to the first 9 postoperative days. Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery constitutes the most common sustained arrhythmia and results in many complications. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of prophylactic use of beta-blockers against atrial fibrillation in off-pump surgery patients in the early postoperative period.
                From 2002 to 2005, 78 patients were enrolled and 41 patients received 50 mg metoprolol succinate daily, which was initiated minimum four days before surgery. Preoperative beta-blocking therapy was continued until the morning of surgery. Thirty-seven patients were free of beta-blocker therapy. Esmolol was used within same range of doses in both groups during operations. Both groups received metoprolol succinate following operations. The frequency of AF occurrence was analysed from the operation time to the sixth postoperative day. Results: Sixteen patients developed AF with an overall incidence of 22.5%. Four patients from the study group and three patients from the control group were excluded from the study because of transfer to on-pump surgery. There was no difference with regard to the number of grafts carried out, duration of operations and ventilation, intensive care unit stay and inotropic need among groups. Length of hospital stay did not differ among groups either. There was a higher incidence of postoperative AF in patients without beta-blocker prophylaxis (11.7-32.4% P=0.049).
                Low-dose postoperative beta-adrenergic blockade is valuable for patients who receive these medications before off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting procedures and may be beneficial against AF in all patients. Seventy patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass grafting were randomized, double-blind, to receive either atenolol or placebo. There were 35 patients in each group. Patients received either atenolol 5 mg intravenously or matching placebo within 3 h of the completion of surgery. A second intravenous dose was administered 24 h following the first and then atenolol 50 mg orally or matching placebo was given for six days. Continuous Holter monitor recordings were obtained for the 24 h immediately preoperatively and continuously for eight days postoperatively. No patient received any antiarrhythmic drug preoperatively. Patients who required pharmacological intervention for the management of postoperative arrhythmias were withdrawn as treatment failures. Holter monitor analysis continued for 24 h following withdrawal of a treatment failure. All patients were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, severity of coronary artery disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, preoperative use of beta-blockers, bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, number of grafts per patient and frequency of preoperative arrhythmias. Arrhythmia analysis was done manually. Supraventricular arrhythmias (atrial tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter) were classified as either mild (less than 0.5 mins, less than 140 beats/min), moderate (0.5 to 30 mins, 140 to 180 beats/min), or severe (longer than 30 mins, more than 180 beats/min). Ventricular arrhythmia analysis was performed with respect to isolated PVCs, couplets, triplets and episodes of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery is a frequent complication after valvular surgery (30-60%). The purpose of this prospective, randomized study was to determine if biatrial synchronous pacing reduces postoperative AF after cardiac valvular surgery as compared to conventional therapy.
                Eighty patients subjected to valvular surgery (52 men, age 66 +/- 10 years) were randomized to one of two groups: one group was treated with biatrial, synchronous pacing (BAP) for 72 h postoperatively (n=40) the other group received no atrial pacing (controls; n=40). All patients had one pair of epicardial wires attached to the right atrium. An additional electrode was placed to the left atrium in the BAP group. These patients were continuously paced at a rate of 10 beats per minute higher than the intrinsic rate starting immediately after surgery. All patients were monitored with full disclosure telemetry or Holter monitors to identify onset of AF.
                Eighteen of the 40 patients in the control group (45%) developed AF within the first 3 days postoperatively as compared to eight patients (20%) in the BAP group (P=0.02). No complications occurred associated with the placement, maintenance and removal of the atrial pacing electrodes.
                Temporary, biatrial synchronous pacing during the first 3 postoperative days is safe and has a significant rhythm-stabilizing effect in patients undergoing valvular cardiac surgery. AF is a frequent arrhythmia complicating CABG, and it is well known that dispersion and prolongation of P wave increases the risk of AF. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of magnesium (Mg) treatment on P-wave duration and dispersion in patients undergoing CABG.
                The study included 148 consecutive patients (33 women, 115 men; mean age 62.1 +/- 7.0 years) undergoing CABG who were randomly allocated to two groups. Group A consisted of 93 patients to whom 1.5 g daily MgSO(4) infusion was applied the day before surgery, just after operation, and 4 days following surgery, and group B consisted of 55 control patients. From the preoperative and postoperative fourth day, 12-lead ECG recordings, duration of the P waves, and P-wave dispersions were calculated.
                There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, sex, and blood Mg level. Comparison of the baseline and day 4 ECG measurements showed no difference as far as heart rates, duration of PQ, and QRS intervals were concerned. AF developed in 2 (2%) cases in group A and in 20 (36%) cases in group B (P < 0.001). There was no difference between the two groups when average basal P max, P min, P dispersion, and day 4 P min values were compared. In group A, fourth day P max (94.3 +/- 11.8 vs 101.0 +/- 13.2 ms; P = 0.0025) and P dispersion (38.2 +/- 9.2 vs 44.9 +/- 10.9 ms; P = 0.0002 ) were significantly lower as compared to group B. Comparing the patients who developed AF, and who did not, no difference was detected with regard to baseline P max, P min, P dispersion, and day 4 P min. Day 4 P max (95.1 +/- 11.8 vs 106.4 +/- 14.0 ms, P = 0.0015) and P dispersion (38.9 +/- 8.8 vs 50.7 +/- 13.0 ms, P = 0.001) of patients who developed AF were significantly higher. Baseline Mg levels were similar in patients who developed AF, and who did not, but the day 4 Mg level was significantly lower in AF group (2.0 +/- 0.23 vs 2.15 +/- 0.26 mg/dL, P < 0.001).
                Perioperative Mg treatment reduces P dispersion and the risk of developing AF in patients undergoing CABG. After aorta-coronary bypass grafting, 164 consecutive patients were randomized to receive propranolol 5 mg every 6 hours orally (n = 82) or to serve as control subjects (n = 82). All patients were receiving beta blockers preoperatively. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of sustained supraventricular (nonsinus) tachyarrhythmias was 23% in the control group and 9.8% in the treated group (p = 0.02). The incidence of ventricular arrhythmias was 15% in the control group and 2.4% in the treated group (p = 0.005). The overall difference in clinically important arrhythmias was 38% in the control group and 12.2% in the treated group (p = 0.0002). We conclude that low-dose oral propranolol in patients who were receiving beta blockers preoperatively is effective in reducing the incidence of clinically important arrhythmias occurring after aorta-coronary bypass grafting. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common problem after CABG. Prevention with prophylactic drug therapy has had limited success, therefore alternative approaches are required. This study investigated the role of biatrial pacing compared with no pacing on AF incidence after isolated first-time CABG.
                During surgery, temporary pacing leads were placed in the lateral wall of the right atrium and at the roof of the left atrium in Bachmann's bundle to allow bipolar pacing and sensing at each site. After surgery, all patients were connected to an external pacemaker (Chorum ELA) that also acted as a Holter monitor. Patients were consecutively randomized to either 4 days of biatrial pacing at a base rate of 80 bpm or to no pacing (control group, base rate 30 bpm). End points included an episode of AF lasting >1 hour on pacemaker Holter, clinically detected AF, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and postoperative complications. One hundred thirty patients were randomized. Biatrial pacing significantly reduced both monitored (13.8% versus 38.5%, P:=0.001) and clinical (10.8% versus 33.8%, P:=0.002) episodes of AF. Median ICU (19 versus 24 hours, P:=NS) and mean hospital stay (7.7+/-6.9 versus 9.7+/-10, P:=NS) did not significantly change. The number of postoperative complications was lower in the biatrial group (13 versus 35, P:=0. 001).
                Biatrial pacing after CABG significantly decreases the incidence of AF. This is associated with reduced postoperative complications and a trend toward reduced ICU and hospital stay. The purpose of this randomized, prospective trial was to determine if Bachmann's bundle pacing reduces the incidence of AF after CABG. The study included 161 patients with no history of AF who were randomized to three groups. Group 1 included 50 patients as controls. Group 2 included 60 patients who had an epicardial wire placed at the lateral wall of the right atrium. In the 51 patients of group 3, the wire was placed at the Bachmann's bundle. In groups 2 and 3, atrial pacing (AAI 96 beats/min) was initiated immediately after CABG and continued for 5 days. The study endpoint was AF lasting > or = 1 minute. Baseline clinical parameters were similar in all three groups. The incidence of AF was not reduced by pacing (group 1: 42%; group 2:48%; group 3:37%; P = NS). The paced P wave duration was increased in group 2 (129 +/- 14 ms vs group 3: 96 +/- 21 ms; P < 0.05). Paced P wave duration was a risk factor for postoperative AF (odds ratio 1.015; 95% CI 1.0021-1.028; P < 0.05). Analysis comparing the pacing groups revealed a reduction in AF during Bachmann's bundle pacing (50 vs 29%; P < 0.01). Pacing thresholds were significantly better at Bachmann's bundle compared to group 2. In conclusion, an anatomically guided pacing at the Bachmann's bundle does not reduce the overall incidence of postoperative AF compared to controls. However, the Bachmann's bundle offers favorable capabilities for postoperative a trial pacing, and thus it is a preferable site for electrode placement if postoperative atrial pacing is required. Atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery are associated with adverse outcomes and increased costs. Previous trials of amiodarone prophylaxis, while promising, were relatively small and yielded conflicting results.
                To determine whether a brief perioperative course of oral amiodarone is an effective and safe prophylaxis for atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery overall and in important subgroups.
                Double-blind randomized controlled trial of 601 patients listed for nonemergent coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and/or valve replacement/repair surgery between February 1, 1999, and September 26, 2003, at a tertiary care hospital. The patients were followed up for 1 year.
                Oral amiodarone (10 mg/kg daily) or placebo administered 6 days prior to surgery through 6 days after surgery (13 days). Randomization was stratified for subgroups defined by age, type of surgery, and use of preoperative beta-blockers.
                Incidence of atrial tachyarrhythmias lasting 5 minutes or longer that prompted therapy by the sixth postoperative day.
                Atrial tachyarrhythmias occurred in fewer amiodarone patients (48/299; 16.1%) than in placebo patients (89/302; 29.5%) overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.69; P<.001); in patients younger than 65 years (19 [11.2%] vs 36 [21.1%]; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.28-0.94]; P = .02); in patients aged 65 years or older (28 [21.7%] vs 54 [41.2%]; HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.27-0.75]; P<.001); in patients who had CABG surgery only (22 [11.3%] vs 46 [23.6%]; HR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.26-0.79]; P = .002); in patients who had valve replacement/repair surgery with or without CABG surgery (25 [23.8%] vs 44 [44.1%]; HR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.31-0.84; P = .008); in patients who received preoperative beta-blocker therapy (27 [15.3%] vs 42 [25.0%]; HR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.34-0.99]; P = .03); and in patients who did not receive preoperative beta-blocker therapy (20 [16.3%] vs 48 [35.8%]; HR, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.22-0.71]; P<.001), respectively. Postoperative sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurred less frequently in amiodarone patients (1/299; 0.3%) than in placebo patients (8/302; 2.6%) (P = .04). Dosage reductions of blinded therapy were more common in amiodarone patients (34/299; 11.4%) than in placebo patients (16/302; 5.3%) (P = .008). There were no differences in serious postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, or readmission to the hospital within 6 months of discharge or in 1-year mortality.
                Oral amiodarone prophylaxis of atrial tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery is effective and may be safe overall and in important patient subgroups. Clinical Trials Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00251706. This study was designed to assess the effects of a perioperative dosing regimen of amiodarone administration, high thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), or a combination of the 2 regimens on atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
                The study was prospective, controlled, and randomized and was performed in a tertiary health care center associated with a university.
                One hundred sixty-three patients scheduled for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
                In this 2 x 2 factorial-designed study the patients were randomized to 1 of 4 regimens in which group E had perioperative TEA, group E+A had TEA and amiodarone, group A had amiodarone, and group C served as control. The epidural catheter was inserted at T1-3 the day before surgery. TEA groups received TEA for 96 hours. The amiodarone regimen consisted of a single loading dose of 1,800 mg of amiodarone orally. Intravenous infusion of amiodarone was started after induction of anesthesia and was administered at 900 mg over 24 hours for the subsequent 3 days.
                AF was documented using Holter monitoring. In group E 22 of 44 (50%), in group E+A 10 of 35 (28.6%), in group A 10 of 36 (27.8%), and in the control group 20 of 48 (41.7%) patients developed AF (odds ratio amiodarone/nonamiodarone 0.47 [0.24-0.90]; P = 0.02).
                The perioperative amiodarone regimen used in this study was effective in reducing the incidence of AF after CABG while TEA was not. To assess if prophylaxis with moderate doses of amiodarone in the postoperative period of cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery), reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients with high risk for developing this arrhythmia.
                A randomized and prospective clinical study involving 68 patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery. Mean age was 64 years and 59% of participants were males. Patients with three or more risk factors for atrial fibrillation, according to the literature, were randomized into two groups to receive or not prophylaxis with amiodarone in the first postoperative day. The dose administered ranged from 600 mg/day to 900 mg/day, intravenously, on the first postoperative day, followed by 400 mg/day orally until hospital discharge or until completing seven days. The other patients, who presented two or fewer risk factors, were followed up until hospital discharge. All patients were evaluated by means of cardiac and/or electrocardiographic monitoring.
                In the group treated with amiodarone, 7% of patients presented atrial fibrillation, whereas in the control group 70% of patients developed arrhythmia. Among the non-randomized individuals (with two or fewer risk factors), only 24% presented atrial fibrillation.
                The prophylactic use of amiodarone was effective in the prevention of atrial fibrillation in patients with three or more risk factors for this arrhythmia. This treatment can be useful to reduce stay at the Intensive Care Unit and, consequently, the complications originating from longer hospitalization. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and results in prolonged hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of biatrial pacing in preventing post-CABG AF compared with single-site atrial pacing.
                A total of 132 patients who had no history of AF and who underwent CABG were randomized to 1 of the following 4 groups: biatrial pacing (BiA), left atrial pacing (LA), right atrial pacing (RA), or no pacing (control) in postoperative period. Overdrive atrial pacing was performed for 5 days. The incidence of AF was significantly reduced in the BiA group (12.5%) compared with the other 3 groups (LA, 36.4%; RA, 33.3%; control, 41. 9%; P<0.05). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in the BiA group. At baseline, the mean P-wave duration (P(dur)) and dispersion (P(dis)) were not prolonged. BiA pacing resulted in the most significant percentage of reduction in P(dis) when compared with the LA or RA groups (BiA, 42+/-8%; LA, 13+/-6%; RA, 10+/-9%; P<0.05 for BiA versus LA or RA). No significant differences existed in mean P(dur) and P(dis) between patients who developed AF and those who remained in sinus rhythm at baseline. However, only those patients who remained in sinus rhythm had a significant reduction in mean P(dur) and P(dis) after pacing therapy.
                Biatrial overdrive pacing is more effective in preventing post-CABG AF than single-site atrial pacing; this therapy also results in a shortened hospital stay. The overall reduction in atrial activation time with BiA pacing was reflected in the reduction in P(dis). Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the most common arrhythmia after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), which not only increases the suffering of the patients, but also prolongs hospital stay and enhances cost of care, especially for patients older than 70 years. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose amiodarone in the prevention of AF after CABG, especially for the elderly.
                Two hundred and ten senile patients undergoing off-pump CABG were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind and placebo controlled study. Patients were given 10 mg/kg of amiodarone (low-dose amiodarone group, n = 100) or placebo (control group, n = 110) daily for 7 days before surgery and followed by 200 mg of amiodarone or placebo daily for 10 days postoperatively.
                Postoperative AF occurred in 16 patients (16%) receiving amiodarone and in 36 (37.7%) patients receiving placebo (P = 0.006). AF occurred at (58.13 +/- 16.63) hours after CABG in the low-dose amiodarone group and at (45.03 +/- 17.40) hours in the control group (P = 0.018). The maximum ventricular rate during AF was significantly slower in the low-dose amiodarone group ((121.42 +/- 28.91) beats/min) than in the control group ((134.11 +/- 30.57) beats/min, P = 0.036). The duration of AF was (10.92 +/- 9.56) hours for the low-dose amiodarone group compared with (14.81 +/- 10.37) hours for the control group (P = 0.002). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly improved in the low-dose amiodarone group (from (59.9 +/- 10.3)% to (63.4 +/- 11.4)%, P = 0.001), and significantly higher compared with the control group ((58.5 +/- 10.7)%, P = 0.002). Both groups had a similar incidence of complication other than rhythm disturbances (12.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.368). The low-dose amiodarone group patients had shorter hospital stays ((11.8 +/- 3.2) days vs (13.8 +/- 4.7) days, P = 0.001) and lower cost of care (RMB (79 115 +/- 16 673) Yuan vs RMB (84 997 +/- 21 587) Yuan, P = 0.031) than that of control group patients. The in-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups (1.0% vs 0.9%, P = 0.946).
                Perioperative low-dose oral amiodarone appeared to be cost-effective in the prevention and delay of new-onset postoperative AF in aged patients. It significantly reduced ventricular rate and duration of AF after CABG, decreased hospital cost and stay, as well as promoted the amelioration of left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, low-dose amiodarone was safe to use and well tolerated with low toxic and side effects, and did not increase the risk of complications and mortality. It is proved to be a first-line therapy and as routine prophylaxis for AF after CABG, especially for elderly patients complicated with left ventricular dysfunction. New onset of atrial fibrillation is a frequent complication after coronary artery bypass grafting and is a major cause of postoperative morbidity. Preoperative oral treatment with amiodarone hydrochloride has been shown to be efficacious as prophylaxis. The present study investigated whether intraoperative use of intravenous amiodarone has a preventive effect on the incidence of atrial fibrillation after coronary revascularization.
                In a prospective study, 150 consecutive patients (mean age, 63 +/- 8 years; 132 men and 18 women) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to one of three groups. Two groups received different doses of intravenous amiodarone (group I, 300-mg bolus and 20 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) for 3 days; group II, 150-mg bolus and 10 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1) for 3 days) after aortic cross-clamping and one group, placebo (group III). Continuous electrocardiographic online monitoring was performed for 10 days. Arrhythmias were analyzed with respect to type, frequency, duration, and clinical relevance.
                New onset of atrial fibrillation occurred in 24% of patients in group I, 28% in group II, and 34% in group III (p = not significant). Atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response (>120 beats per minute) was significantly more frequent in the control group (group I, 14%; group II, 24%; group III, 32%; p < 0.05, group I versus group III) and appeared significantly earlier (group I, day 4.3 +/- 2.5; group II, day 4.8 +/- 2.9; group III, day 2.6 +/- 1.3; p < 0.05, group III versus groups I and II). Temporary atrial pacing because of bradycardia (<60 beats per minute) was necessary significantly more often in group I (group I, 48%; group II, 40%; group III, 28%; p < 0.05, group I versus group III). Early mortality rate (group I, 4%; group II, 2%; group III, 4%), rate of perioperative complications (group I, 14%; group II, 20%; group III, 14%), and duration of hospital stay (group I, 14.0 days; group II, 14.4 days; group III, 14.7 days) were not different between groups.
                Intraoperative prophylactic use of amiodarone does not prevent new onset of atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and had no effect on outcome. Therefore, intraoperative prophylactic treatment with amiodarone at the tested doses does not appear to be justified. Ninety-nine consecutive consenting patients were prospectively entered into a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the efficacy of postoperative magnesium therapy on the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. No patient had documented or suspected arrhythmias preoperatively. Forty-nine patients received 178 mEq of magnesium given over the first 4 postoperative days, and 50 patients received only placebo. The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar. The preoperative mean serum magnesium concentration was similar in both study (1.90 mEq/L) and placebo (1.90 mEq/L) groups. The mean postoperative serum magnesium concentration in study patients was significantly elevated over postoperative days 1 through 4 when compared with preoperative levels (p less than 0.001). The postoperative mean serum magnesium concentration in control patients declined and remained significantly depressed through postoperative day 3 (p less than 0.001), but increased to preoperative levels by postoperative day 4. The mean serum magnesium concentration was significantly greater in the study patients as compared with the control patients over postoperative days 1 through 4 (p less than 0.001). Although there was no significant difference between groups with respect to episodes of ventricular arrhythmias, there was a significant decrease in the number of episodes of atrial fibrillation in the group receiving magnesium therapy (p less than 0.02). There were no recognized adverse effects of magnesium therapy. Prophylactic magnesium administration seems to lessen the incidence and severity of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT) commonly occurs shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), but ventricular arrhythmias are less documented.
                On the 1st postoperative day, 206 consecutive eligible patients were prospectively randomized to a sotalol group (80 mg b.i.d.; n = 103) or a control group without beta-blockade or antiarrhythmic drugs (n = 103).
                The SVT incidence (predominantly atrial fibrillation) accounted for 16% in the sotalol group versus 48% (p < 0.00001). Multivariate analysis showed that sotalol reduced the SVT incidence (p < 0.00001, odds ratio, 0.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.42), whereas a lower preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.019) and older age (p = 0.031) were independent risk factors of SVT occurrence. The Holter electrocardiographic analysis (24 hours) demonstrated that sotalol (32 versus 92; p = 0.031) decreased the median number of ventricular events, mostly isolated premature ventricular beats. Neither ventricular proarrhythmia effect nor "torsades de pointes" were detected. Despite strict hemodynamic-based selection, sotalol had to be discontinued in 8 patients (7.8%), for reasons related to asthma in 3 or cardiac reasons in 5.
                Oral low-dose sotalol provided considerable and reliable protection in selected nondepressed cardiac function patients, reducing the occurrence of both supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias after CABG. This study was aimed to compare the results of post operative biatrial pacing and i.v. amiodarone in prevention of AF. In a single blind randomized clinical trial, 210 patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery were randomized either to receive overdrive biatrial pacing, i.v. amiodarone or no intervention. Incidence of AF postoperatively evaluated. Pacing was successful in 83% of patients and 80% of patients in amiodarone group could receive their drug. Twenty and one patients developed AF. Incidence of AF in pace, amiodarone and control group was 10.7, 5.3 and 17.9%, respectively (p = 0.08). Comparing incidence of AF between pacing and control group, the difference was not significant (p = 0.2), but the difference between amiodarone and control groups was significant statistically (p = 0.03). Patients who developed AF were older but their left ventricular ejection fraction was not different with patients without AF. The ICU stay was higher in patients with AF. Use of i.v. amiodarone was more effective than biatrial pacing in prevention of post operative AF and we recommend use of this drug in high risk patients. Atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) constitutes the most common sustained arrhythmia and results in prolonged hospitalization. The purpose of this study was to assess simultaneous right and left atrial pacing as prophylaxis for postoperative atrial fibrillation.
                From July 2003 to May 2004, 120 patients without structural heart disease and who underwent CABG were randomly classified into one of the following 3 groups: biatrial pacing (BAP), left atrial pacing (LAP), and no pacing (control). Atrial pacing was performed for 4 days. Post-CABG AF was significantly reduced in BAP group compared to single-site and control group (BAP, 17.5%; LAP, 30%; control, 45%; p=0.02). The mean length of hospital stay was significantly reduced in BAP group. Hospital charges were not significantly different between three groups. The mean length of hospital stay was most significantly reduced in BAP group (6.1+/-1.2 versus 9.0+/-4.1 days in the control groups; p=0.002, and 8.7+/-1.3 days in LAP groups; p=0.01). The mean length of stay in the intensive care unit was also significantly reduced in the BAP group (2.8+/-0.7 versus 4.6+/-4.5 days in control group; p=0.04, and 4.2+/-3.2 days in LAP group; p=0.01).
                Simultaneous right and left atrial pacing is well tolerated and is more effective in preventing post-CABG AF than single-site pacing, and, results in a shortened hospital stay. Identifying patients at risk for developing postoperative AF and using this prophylactic method may be the optimal effective strategy. Pericardial effusion and atrial fibrillation (AF) are two common complications in coronary revascularization surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of posterior pericardiotomy in pericardial effusion and AF.
                This randomized prospective study includes 113 patients who underwent isolated CABG procedure between May 2000 and December 2000 in our hospital. Posterior pericardiotomy incision was done in Group I (n=54). Group II constituted the control group (n=59). Postoperative pericardial effusion was assessed by echocardiography and rhythm follow-up was done by the same cardiologist.
                There was no significant difference between study group and the control group considering the chest drainage (940.18+/-367.96 vs 894.92+/-360.65; p=0.507). The number of patients with remarkable intrapericardial effusion (>50 ml) was significantly lower in the posterior pericardiotomy group (25.93% vs 47.45%, p=0.020). The incidence of postoperative AF was no different between the posterior pericardiotomy group and the control group (12.96% vs 20.34%; p=0.32). In both groups, the incidence of AF was significantly higher in patients with mild or moderate pericardial effusion (29%), compared to patients with no or minimal pericardial effusion (10%), (p=0.017).
                Posterior pericardiotomy significantly reduces the pericardial effusion in coronary bypass procedure postoperatively. Patients with pericardial effusion were subjected to AF more frequently. Arrhythmias are a common cause of morbidity after cardiac surgery. This study assessed the efficacy of prophylactic amiodarone in reducing the incidence of atrial fibrillation or flutter and ventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery surgery.
                A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial. 60 patients received a 24 hour intravenous infusion of amiodarone (15 mg/kg started after removal of the aortic cross clamp) followed by 200 mg orally three times daily for 5 days, and 60 patients received placebo.
                6 patients (10%) in the amiodarone group and 14 (23%) in the placebo group needed treatment for arrhythmias (95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the difference between groups was 0 to 26%, p = 0.05). The incidence of supraventricular tachycardia detected clinically and requiring treatment was lower in the amiodarone group (8% amiodarone v 20% placebo, 95% CI 0 to 24%, p = 0.07). The incidence detected by 24 hour Holter monitoring was similar (17% amiodarone v 20% placebo). Untreated arrhythmias in the amiodarone group were either clinically benign and undetected (n = 3) or the ventricular response rate was slow (n = 2). Age > 60 years was a positive risk factor for the development of supraventricular tachycardia in the amiodarone group but not in the placebo group. Fewer patients had episodes of ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation recorded on Holter monitoring in the amiodarone group (15% amiodarone v 33% placebo, 95% CI 3 to 33%, p = 0.02). Bradycardia (78% amiodarone v 48% placebo, 95% CI 14% to 46%, p < 0.005) and pauses (7% amiodarone v 0% placebo) occurred in more amiodarone treated patients. Bradycardia warranted discontinuation of treatment in one patient treated with amiodarone.
                The incidence of clinically significant tachycardia was reduced by amiodarone. The ventricular response rate was slowed in supraventricular tachycardia, but the induction of bradycardia may preclude the routine use of amiodarone for prophylaxis. To examine the influence of magnesium (Mg) on hypomagnesaemia and atrial fibrillation (AF) following coronary artery by-pass surgery, 140 consecutive patients were randomized to receive 70 mmol of magnesium sulphate intravenously (n = 69) or placebo (n = 71). Serum magnesium concentrations fell to 0.77 +/- 0.10 mmol.l-1 in the control group but rose to 1.09 +/- 0.17 mmol.l-1 in the Mg group (P < 0.001). The incidence of AF was 29% in the Mg group and 26% in the placebo group (NS). The AF patients were older, more of them had had prior AF episodes, their sinus rates (SR) were slower (78 +/- 10 vs 86 +/- 12 beats.min-1; P < 0.01) and serum Mg concentrations higher (0.89 +/- 0.21 vs 0.80 +/- 0.11 mmol.l-1; P < 0.05). The incidence of AF was 43% in the highest quartile of serum Mg and 23% among the rest (P = 0.056). In patients experiencing AF during the first three post-operative days, serum Mg concentrations were higher and SR slower on each day compared with non-AF patients. SR increased post-operatively less with high Mg levels (P = 0.044). In the Mg group, serum Mg and SR were the only independent predictors of AF. In conclusion, the incidence of post-operative AF is not decreased with magnesium. High Mg levels are likely to provoke AF probably by mechanisms that modify SR. Forty-one patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly assigned to receive prophylactic timolol or placebo, given in a double-blind fashion. beta-Adrenoceptor-blocking therapy was stopped at least one half-life before surgery. Three to 7 hr after surgery (304 +/- 56 min), 0.5 mg of timolol or placebo was given intravenously twice daily in a double-blind manner. When oral medications were resumed postoperatively, 10 mg of timolol twice daily or placebo was continued orally. Continuous electrocardiograms were recorded for 24 hr before and for 7 days after surgery with a standard cassette recorder. No patient received digoxin. Both groups were comparable for frequency of preoperative supraventricular arrhythmias, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamp time, number of bypass grafts, and total duration of monitoring. Analysis of arrhythmias was done by hand counts, and supraventricular arrhythmias were divided into supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation and/or flutter. Timolol decreased the frequency of supraventricular tachycardia (581 episodes placebo vs 84 timolol; p less than .05) and of atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (291 episodes placebo vs five timolol; p less than .05). Timolol decreased the number of patients with severe (heart rate greater than 200 beats/min, duration greater than 50 beats) episodes of supraventricular tachycardia (four placebo vs 0 timolol; p less than .05) and also decreased the number of episodes of severe (heart rate greater than 200 beats/min, duration greater than 5 min) atrial fibrillation and/or flutter (16 placebo vs one timolol; p less than .005). There were differences in the durations of supraventricular arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurs in 20% to 40% of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and contributes to delayed recovery, increased length of stay, and increased hospital cost. Measures at preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation have had mixed results. We report a double-blind trial comparing oral amiodarone with placebo for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after CABG.
                All patients undergoing CABG were considered eligible. Exclusion criteria included bradycardia (<50 beats/min), prior Atrial fibrillation, concurrent therapy with antiarrhythmic drugs, or concomitant valve surgery. Patients were given 2 g of amiodarone (73 patients) or placebo (70 patients) in divided doses 1 to 4 days before surgery and 400 mg daily for 7 days postoperatively. Atrial fibrillation occurred in 24.7% (18 of 43) of patients receiving amiodarone and 32. 8% (23 of 70) of patients receiving placebo (P =.30). Heart rate at onset of atrial fibrillation was 133.4 +/- 26.6 beats/min for amiodarone compared with 152.9 +/- 31.6 beats/min for placebo (P =. 04). Duration of atrial fibrillation was 10.2 +/- 8.1 hours for amiodarone compared with 16.2 +/- 27.5 hours for placebo (P =.67). Patients receiving both beta-blockade and amiodarone had a 16.7% incidence of atrial fibrillation compared with 31.9% in the remaining patients (P =.10). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased cost of $7011 compared with those who remained in sinus rhythm ($23,869 +/- $20,894 vs $16,857 +/- $5401 in sinus rhythm). Hospital cost of those taking amiodarone was $18,895 +/- $13,267 compared with $18,839 +/- $11,537.18 for placebo (P =.42).
                Postoperative CABG atrial fibrillation is associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased cost. Prophylactic oral amiodarone did not statistically alter the incidence or duration of atrial fibrillation after CABG, although favorable trends were noted. Hospital cost was not affected by therapy with amiodarone. To evaluate whether postoperative administration of intravenous low-dose amiodarone and magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) combination would reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in normomagnesemic high-risk patients for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF).
                A total of 136 patients undergoing elective CABG and had > or =3 risk factors for POAF were prospectively randomized to one of three groups, to receive a single dose of amiodarone (5 mg/kg) and MgSO(4) (1.5 g) (combination group, n = 44), or an equal dose of amiodarone (amiodarone group, n = 44) or equal volumes of saline (control group, n = 48) at early postoperative period. Continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring was performed for the first 48 hours and an ECG was recorded every 8 hours later. POAF longer than 30 minutes or for any length requiring treatment, and the drug-related side effects were recorded.
                The study population showed a homogeneous distribution regarding risk factors for POAF and there was no significant difference in patient characteristics, echocardiographic variables, or operative variables among three groups. POAF developed in 4 patients in combination group, in 16 patients in amiodarone group and in 16 patients in control group, representing a 24% relative risk reduction between the combination group and control group (p = 0.023). No statistically significant difference regarding incidence of POAF was observed between amiodarone and control groups.
                Combined prophylactic therapy with amiodarone and MgSO(4) at the early postoperative period without a maintenance phase is an effective, simple, well-tolerated, and possibly cost-effective regimen to prevent POAF in normomagnesemic, high-risk patients. In our previous study, we defined a cut-off point of 120 ms for atrial electromechanical interval (AEMi) to determine the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence. Accordingly, the present study sought to investigate whether or not a prophylactic perioperative administration of amiodarone could reduce the incidence of AF in a high-risk group (AEMi >120 ms) undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In this prospective, randomized study, 100 patients with AEMi >120 ms received either amiodarone (n=50) or placebo (n=50). The endpoints were AF occurrence after CABG and hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) lengths of stay after CABG. The incidence of postoperative AF was significantly higher in the placebo group than that of the amiodarone group (88% of patients in control group vs. 16% of patients in amiodarone group, P<0.0001). The prophylactic therapy with amiodarone significantly reduced the ICU length of stay (2.28+/-1.00 vs. 3.60+/-0.90 days, P<0.0001) and hospital length of stay (5.64+/-2.35 vs. 7.78+/-1.46 days, P<0.0001). The incidence of postoperative AF among patients with high AEMi was significantly reduced by a prophylactic amiodarone treatment, resulting in shorter ICU and hospital stays. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Since its prevention with prophylactic drug therapy has limited success, alternative approaches are desirable. This study examined the efficacy of atrial or biatrial pacing, compared with no pacing, on the incidence of AF after isolated CABG.
                From August 2002 to September 2004, 240 patients underwent CABG. After surgery, right and left atrial epicardial pacing wires were implanted for 72 hours of temporary pacing. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: no pacing (control group), right atrial (RA), and biatrial (BiA) pacing. Cardiac rhythm was monitored continuously during intensive care, or daily on the ward. The primary endpoints of this study were an episode of AF occurring up to 72 hours after CABG and the risk factors correlated with this event.
                Atrial and BiA pacing significantly lowered the incidence (1.25% vs 25%, P = 0.001) of AF episodes, and were both correlated (odd ratio 0.038; 95% confidence interval 0.005-0.29) with a decrease in rates of postoperative AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age (odd ratio 1.074; 95% confidence interval 1.024-1.12) and no pacing as independent risk factors of postoperative AF.
                Temporary right atrial or biatrial pacing after CABG significantly decreased the postoperative incidence of AF. Multivariable analysis identified older age and no pacing as predictors of AF occurrence. Recently, several temporary multisite pacing methods have been developed for prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                In this study, we evaluated the effect of triple-site temporary triggered pacing in the AAT mode on the development of AF in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) at high risk for developing postoperative AF.
                A total of 70 patients undergoing CABG were randomly assigned either to pacing group (study group, n = 35 patients) or to no pacing group (control group, n = 35 patients). The external pacemaker was programmed to pace at the atrial triggered mode at a lower rate of 40 beats/min for 4 days.
                Atrial fibrillation, defined as lasting > 30 s, occurred in 4 patients (11.4%) in the study group and in 16 patients (45.7%) in the control group (p = 0.003). Sustained AF, defined as AF lasting > 10 min, also was observed less frequently in the study group than in the control group (11.6 vs. 37.1%, p = 0.024). Triple-site triggered atrial pacing was observed to reduce the incidence of AF by 75% and the incidence of sustained AF by 69%.
                We believe that multiple-site temporary pacing in the triggered mode is an effective way of preventing postoperative AF. This technique may be used especially in patients at high risk of developing AF. To investigate the effectiveness and safety of low-dose sotalol (a class III antiarrhythmic beta-blocking agent) in the prevention of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) and to identify predictors for the occurrence of these arrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting, 300 consecutive patients were randomized in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Patients with severely depressed left ventricular function or other contraindications for beta blockers were excluded. Beginning at 4 hours and up to the sixth day after surgery, 150 patients received 40 mg of sotalol every 6 hours. SVT was observed in 24 (16%) of 150 low-dose sotalol-and in 49 (33%) of 150 placebo-treated patients [p less than 0.005]. In patients receiving sotalol, atrial fibrillation was the only noted tachyarrhythmia, whereas in the placebo group, 42 (28%) patients had atrial fibrillation, 3 (2%) atrial flutter, 1 (0.7%) atrial tachycardia and 3 (2%) sinus tachycardia. Drug-related adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of the drug were noted in only 2 (1%) sotalol-treated patients and 4 (3%) placebo-treated patients (p = not significant). For both groups, univariate analysis indicated that older age, 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease, long bypass (greater than or equal to 150 minutes) and aorta cross-clamp time (greater than or equal to 120 minutes) were predictive variables for the occurrence of SVTs. Multivariate analysis showed that male sex (odds ratio 2.3), 1- or 2-vessel coronary artery disease (odds ratio 2.0) and older age (odds ratio 1.1) were independent risk factors for increased occurrence of postoperative SVT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Seventy-one patients submitted routinely to coronary artery bypass surgery were randomized into 2 groups. Group A (32 patients) received 24 hr after initiation of surgery an intravenous perfusion of 100 mg of acebutolol given over 24 hr (22 cases) or 600 mg administered orally (10 cases). On subsequent days, they received 1200 mg of acebutolol/day orally. Group B (39 patients) was used as control. The groups were comparable in terms of age, sex, severity of coronary disease, preoperative therapy, duration of extracorporeal circulation, aortic clamping time, and immediate postoperative haemodynamic findings. No patient received digitalis. During hospital stay (10 days), 1 group A patient (3%) and 13 group B patients (33%; P less than 0.001) developed a sustained episode of atrial arrhythmia (fibrillation, flutter or atrial ectopic tachycardia). The majority of these rhythm disorders developed between days 2 and 4. On Holter monitoring on days 7-10, malignant ventricular extrasystoles (grades IV and V of Lown's classification) were more frequent in group B (65.2%) than in group A (19.3%; P less than 0.001). Haemodynamic measurements taken at rest performed in 27 patients on days 7-10 (16 patients of group A; 11 of group B). No difference was observed between the two groups. Acebutolol is a safe and efficacious drug for the prevention of arrhythmias following coronary surgery. To evaluated the effects of temporary atrial pacing to prevent the atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery and the risk factors to the occurrence of this arrhytmia.
                We have studied 160 patients who, at the end of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, were submitted to epicardial electrode implantation in the right atrium lateral wall. They were randomized into two groups: non-pacing (NP) group and right atrial (RA) pacing group. The cardiac rhythm was monitorized over 72 hours following to the end of surgery and the variables studied were as follow: incidence of atrial fibrillation; the risk factors pre-, intra-, and postoperative for its occurrence, and postoperative events.
                There were 21 (13.1%) episodes of atrial fibrillation, 20 in the NP group and one in the RA group. The relative risk (RR) for the development of atrial fibrillation was 0.18 (95% CI; 0.05-0.60) for the RA group when compared to the NP group. The logistic regression identified that the study variables, such as younger age; use of beta-blockers in the preoperative, and the presence of right atrial pacing had been associated to a lower Odds ratios (ORs) for the occurrence of atrial fibrillation in the postoperative.
                The temporary atrial pacing reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation after the CABG surgery. Older age and a non-atrial pacing were the independent predictive factors of the occurrence of this arrhythmia. nan The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of posterior pericardiotomy from the point of pericardial effusion related with supraventricular tachycardia and development of delayed posterior cardiac effusions. Materials and methods: This prospective randomized study was carried out in 200 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery in Gülhane Medical Academy Department of Cardiovascular Surgery between June 1996 and June 1997. Patients were divided into 2 groups; each group included 100 patients. Longitudinal incision was made parallel and posterior to the left phrenic nerve, extending from the left inferior pulmonary vein to the diaphragm in group I patients. Posterior pericardiotomy was not done in group II.
                Atrial fibrillation was developed in 6 patients (6%) in group I and in 34 patients (34%) in group II (P =.0000007). Atrial flutter and other supraventricular arrhythmia prevalence was not statistically significant. Early and late pericardial effusion were developed 54% and 21%, respectively, in group II, but neither early nor late pericardial effusion were developed in group I (P =.00001). Delayed pericardial tamponade was also significantly lower in group I (0% vs 10%; P =.001).
                Posterior pericardiotomy is technically easy to perform and a safe and effective technique that reduces not only the prevalence of early pericardial effusion and related atrial fibrillation but also delayed posterior pericardial effusion and tamponade. Atrial fibrillation occurs in 10% to 40% of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass grafting. This prospective study assesses the safety and efficacy of low-dose intravenous amiodarone in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.
                One hundred forty patients were randomly divided into two groups: an amiodarone group (n = 74) receiving intravenous amiadarone in a loading dose of 150 mg and maintenance dose of 0.4 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 3 days before and 5 days after operation and a control group (n = 76) receiving matching infusions of 5% glucose solution.
                Atrial fibrillation occurred in 9 (12%) of the amiodarone group patients and in 26 (34%) of the control group patients during hospitalization (p < 0.01). The maximum ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation was significantly slower in the amiodarone group (107 +/- 21) than in the control group (138 +/- 24 beats per minute, p < 0.01). The duration of atrial fibrillation in the amiodarone group (1.1 +/- 1.2 hours) was significantly shorter than that in the control group (3.2 +/- 1.3 hours, p = 0.01). The two groups had no significant differences in incidence of major morbidity (8 of 74 versus 8 of 76 in amiodarone and control groups, respectively) or mortality (4 of 74 versus 5 of 76). However, the control group had significantly longer intensive care unit stays (132 +/- 24 versus 111 +/- 19 hours, p < 0.01).
                Perioperative low-dose intravenous amiodarone significantly reduces the incidence, ventricular rate, and duration of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Furthermore, low-dose intravenous amiodarone is well tolerated and does not increase the risk of intraoperative or postoperative complications. A total of 116 patients undergoing coronary revascularization were randomized preoperatively in a double-blind manner to receive 80 mg daily of propranolol or placebo in the postoperative period. Preoperatively, all patients had been receiving at least 80 mg of propranolol a day to the time of the operation. In addition, all patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.4 or more, no history of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia (SVT), and no need of digitalis preparations or other antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients were monitored for 5 days and propranolol or placebo was started 24 hours postoperatively. SVT was documented with biatrial electrograms in all cases. Study groups were similar in postoperative creatine kinase MB levels and postoperative weight gain, but the placebo group tended to be older and have more grafts per patient. Seven patients randomized were dropped from the study, two with perioperative infarction, four with persistent ventricular arrhythmias necessitating quinidine or procainamide, and one with persistent postoperative hypotension (placebo). There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative SVT in these two groups: 13.2% in the propranolol group and 16.1% in the placebo group. We conclude that 80 mg daily of propranolol given postoperatively to patients undergoing coronary revascularization does not effectively reduce the incidence of SVT. To determine whether restarting of Beta Blocker following cardiac surgery would reduce the incidence and the severity of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                210 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to control (C) (n = 105) and Beta Blockers (BB) (n = 105) groups. Preoperatively all patients were on one type or another of betablockers. Postoperatively only the (BB) group received the medication. Both groups were well matched and had the same cardioplegic technique.
                It was found that; (1) post op (AF) developed in 40 patients of group (C) and in 18 patients of group (BB) P value < 0.02. (2) 73% of (AF) patients in group (C) and 81% in group (BB) were older than 70 years of age. (3) 76% of the (AF) in (BB) group versus 43% in (C) group were converted to sinus rhythm or to a stable controlled rhythm within 24 h or less. P value < 0.01.
                The results indicate that restarting the Beta Blockers in the post-operative period after coronary bypass grafts significantly control the incidence and the severity of atrial fibrillation. Also it confirms the strong relation between the older age and (AF) occurrence. Atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs often in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and can result in increased morbidity and mortality. Previous studies using P-wave signal-averaged electrocardiogram (P-SAECG) have shown that patients with a longer filtered P-wave duration (FPD) have a high risk of AF after CABG. We have shown that patients with an FPD > or = 124 ms and a root-mean-square voltage of the last 20 ms of the P-wave 20 < or = 3.7 microV have an increased risk of AF after surgery. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to investigate whether or not prophylactic peri-operative administration of amiodarone could reduce the incidence of AF in this high-risk group undergoing CABG identified by P-SAECG.
                In this prospective, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized study, 110 patients received either amiodarone (n = 55) or placebo (n = 55). During CABG, two patients of both groups died. Amiodarone was given as 600 mg oral single dose one day before and from days 2 through 7 after surgery. In addition, amiodarone was also administered intravenously during surgery in a 300-mg bolus for 1 h and as a total maintenance dose of 20 mg/kg weight over 24 h on the first day following surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of AF after CABG. The secondary endpoint was the hospitalization length of stay after CABG. The baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups. The incidence of post-operative AF was significantly higher in the placebo group compared with the amiodarone group (85 vs. 34% of patients, P < 0.0001). The prophylactic therapy with amiodarone significantly reduced the intensive care (1.8 +/- 1.7 vs. 2.4 +/- 1.5 days, P = 0.001) and hospitalization length of stay (11.3 +/- 3.4 vs. 13.0 +/- 4.3 days, P = 0.03). In the amiodarone group, concentrations of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone differed significantly between patients with AF and sinus rhythm (amiodarone: 0.96 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.4 microg/mL, P = 0.02; desethylamiodarone: 0.65 +/- 0.2 vs. 0.48 +/- 0.1 microg/mL, P = 0.04).
                The incidence of post-operative AF among high-risk patients was significantly reduced by a prophylactic amiodarone treatment resulting in a shorter time of intensive care unit and hospital stay. Our data supports the prophylactic use of amiodarone in peri-operative period in patients at high risk for AF after CABG. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to investigate the efficacy of atrial overdrive pacing (AOP) and bradycardia prevention pacing (BPP) in the prophylaxis of atrial fibrillation (AF) after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG).
                One hundred and twenty-four on-pump CABG patients were randomized into three groups: AOP, BPP, and NP (no pacing). AOP patients were paced via epicardial wires using an atrial preference pacing algorithm, and BPP patients were paced in the AAI mode with a base rate of 60/min. Patients were paced for 48 h starting on the first postoperative day. The endpoint of the study was the first onset of AF lasting longer than 5 min.
                Preoperative risk factors and surgical data of patients did not differ between the AOP, BPP and NP groups. Pacing was technically successful in 80.5% of patients in the AOP and in 92.7% in the BPP groups. The incidence of AF in the AOP (26.8%), BPP (19.5%) and NP (28.6%) groups did not differ significantly. In the AOP group, AF in three patients was probably induced by inappropriate pacing due to sensing failure.
                Atrial overdrive pacing and bradycardia prevention pacing were not effective in the prevention of AF after CABG. This study compares the ability of two oral amiodarone regimens to reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) as compared with the placebo among elderly open heart surgery (OHS) patients receiving beta blockade.
                This is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of 220 patients undergoing OHS. Patients (average age, 73 years) received 7 g of oral amiodarone more than 10 days starting 5 days before OHS (slow load; n = 56), a 6 g oral amiodarone regimen more than 6 days starting 1 day before OHS (fast load; n = 64), or matching placebo in one of the two previously mentioned regimens (n = 100).
                Patients receiving the slow load amiodarone regimen had a significant reduction in the risk of AF (48.4%; p = 0.013), AF lasting more than 24 hours (76.5%; p = 0.003), symptomatic AF (90.0%; p = 0.002), and recurrent AF (64.5%; p = 0.025) as compared with the placebo. Patients receiving the fast load amiodarone regimen had significant reductions in the risk of AF lasting more than 24 hours (52.6%; p = 0.038) and symptomatic AF (65.0%; p = 0.024), but the incidence of any AF or any recurrence of AF only showed a trend toward significance (34.0% and 45.5%; p = 0.054 and 0.09, respectively).
                Oral amiodarone in a slow loading regimen provides significant suppression of all AF factors and can be used when a patient has started it at least 5 days before OHS. If a patient has less than 5 days before OHS, the fast loading regimen is an efficacious alternative as it provides significant benefits in preventing AF from lasting more than 24 hours and for preventing symptomatic AF. Both regimens were well tolerated and safe in elderly patients receiving beta blockade according to the hospital's standard protocol. The effect of a hybrid intravenous and oral prophylactic amiodarone regimen on postcardiothoracic surgery (CTS) atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. The impact of active atrial septal pacing on post-CTS AF has not been well characterized. In addition, the effect of using both amiodarone and atrial septal pacing together to prevent atrial fibrillation is unknown.
                Patients (n=160) were randomized to amiodarone or placebo and then to pacing or no pacing using a 2x2 factorial design. All therapies began within 6 hours post-CTS. Amiodarone was given by intravenous infusion for the first 24 hours (1050 mg total) followed by oral therapy for 4 postoperative days (4800 mg total). Atrial septal pacing was given for 96 hours. Amiodarone reduced the risk of AF by 43% and the risk of symptomatic AF by 68% (P=0.037 and P=0.019) versus placebo. Atrial septal pacing did not reduce AF or symptomatic AF incidence versus no pacing. The risk of post-CTS AF in the patients receiving amiodarone+pacing was lower than the placebo+no pacing and the placebo+pacing groups (57.9% and 60.5% reductions, P=0.047 and P=0.040, respectively).
                Amiodarone given as both an intravenous and oral regimen is effective at reducing post-CTS AF but atrial septal pacing is ineffective. Combining amiodarone and pacing is better than placebo with or without pacing but not amiodarone alone. Atrial fibrillation is still a frequent complication that increases morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting. This prospective randomized study is designed to define efficacy of postoperative amiodarone prophylaxis in preventing atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
                One hundred forty-four patients who underwent elective off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting were enrolled for the study. Seventy-six patients (amiodarone group) received 5 mg/kg loading amiodarone infusion in the first postoperative hour, followed by 10 mg/kg for the first 24 hours. After 24 hours, patients received 600 mg/day amiodarone orally for 7 days and 200 mg/day until the end of the postoperative first month. Sixty-eight patients received placebo (control group).
                Preoperative characteristics and operative variables of the patients were similar in both groups. Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation and maximal ventricular rate response were recorded. The incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation (11.8% versus 26.5%) (P = .025) and maximal ventricular rate response (109 +/- 13.8 beats/min versus 124.5 +/- 13.9 beats/min) (P = .011) were significantly lower in the amiodarone group. Duration of atrial fibrillation was 17.5 +/- 8.1 hours for the amiodarone group compared with 32.7 +/- 12 hours for the control group (P = .002).
                Postoperative intravenous amiodarone prophylaxis followed by oral amiodarone significantly reduces the incidence of atrial fibrillation after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting and the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation. Our aims were to examine whether the administration of amiodarone or magnesium sulphate after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) could reduce the occurrence of atrial fibrillation, and to identify the risk factors associated with atrial fibrillation after CABG. Patients scheduled for elective CABG (n = 155) were allocated randomly, in a controlled double-blind study, to receive immediately after surgery a 72-h infusion of amiodarone (900 mg per 24 h), magnesium (4 g per 24 h) or placebo (0.9% NaCl; 50 ml per 24 h) intravenously. A 72-h Holter ECG was recorded concomitantly. The primary end-point was the prevention of atrial fibrillation; its onset was considered as prophylactic failure. An interim safety analysis was performed in 147 patients. The cumulative occurrence of atrial fibrillation was 27% in the placebo group, 14% in the amiodarone group (P = 0.14) and 23% in the magnesium group (P = 0.82). Although amiodarone delayed the onset of the first tachyarrhythmic episode (P = 0.02), it was associated with the need for longer periods of vasoactive drug infusion and invasive monitoring and a longer stay in the intensive care unit. Variables associated with the onset of atrial fibrillation were older age (odds ratio 1.9) and a plasma magnesium concentration at 24 h of less than 0.95 mmol litre-1 (odds ratio 6.7). Postoperative administration of amiodarone reduced the occurrence of atrial fibrillation after elective CABG surgery, but was associated with a longer duration of cardiovascular instability and longer need for intensive care; magnesium prophylaxis had no effect. Advanced age and a low plasma magnesium concentration are risk factors for postoperative atrial fibrillation. Eighty-five patients receiving long-term propranolol therapy were randomized after aorta-coronary bypass grafting either to receive minidose propranolol (Group I) or to serve as controls (Group II). They were compared with 18 patients (Group III) who did not receive beta blocking agents prior to operation but were given propranolol postoperatively. Poor-risk patients (those having left ventricular aneurysms, low ejection fraction, or congestive heart failure) as well as patients who required catecholamines postoperatively were included in the study. All three groups were comparable with respect to all risk factors. Propranolol (5 to 10 mg/6 hr) was started through a nasogastric tube 6 hours after operation and continued orally in all patients in Groups I and III. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmia appeared in two of 37 patients in Group I (5%), 19 of 48 patients in Group II (40%), and five of 18 patients in Group III (27%). The incidence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia was significantly lower in Group I than in Groups II and III (p less than 0.001, Group I versus Group II; p less than 0.01, Group I versus Group III). In conclusion, low-dose propranolol is very effective in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmia following aorta-coronary bypass in patients receiving beta blockers preoperatively. The increased tendency for postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmia to develop in these patients is attributed to hypersensitivity to adrenergic stimulation after propranolol withdrawal. The tachyarrhythmia can be prevented by early reinstitution of propranolol in low doses after the operation. Atrial pacing is often used empirically to suppress atrial ectopy and prevent atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting.
                To determine whether atrial overdrive pacing reduces atrial fibrillation and atrial ectopy after coronary artery bypass grafting, 100 patients were randomized to no atrial pacing (Control) versus AAI pacing at 10 beats/min or more above the resting heart rate (Paced), started by postoperative day 1 and continued through day 4. Major end points were new atrial fibrillation and frequency of atrial ectopy during the first 4 days after coronary artery bypass grafting.
                Atrial fibrillation occurred by day 4 in 13 of 51 (25.5%) Paced and in 14 of 49 (28.6%) Control patients, p = 0.90. Control patients who developed atrial fibrillation had significantly more atrial ectopy than those who did not. Atrial ectopy was paradoxically more frequent in the Paced group (2,106+/-428 versus 866+/-385 per 24 hours, p = 0.0001). Loss of capture, sensing, and consistent atrial pacing occurred frequently during atrial pacing.
                Contrary to prevailing opinion and practice, postoperative atrial overdrive pacing significantly increases atrial ectopy and does not reduce the likelihood of atrial fibrillation. A prospective study of 100 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery was performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of a posterior pericardiotomy in reducing the incidence of pericardial effusions and, consequently, reducing the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias in the post-operative period. Pericardial effusion occurred in 4 of 50 patients following a posterior pericardiotomy, whereas effusion occurred in 20 of 50 patients in whom a pericardiotomy was not created (P < 0.0005). Supra-ventricular arrhythmias occurred in 4 patients in the pericardiotomy group and 18 in the group treated without pericardiotomy (P < 0.005). No complications resulted from this procedure. We conclude that pericardiotomy is a simple, safe and effective method for reducing the incidence or pericardial effusion and thereby post-operative supra-ventricular arrhythmias. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common after cardiac surgery and adds significant cost and morbidity. The use of prophylactic pacing strategies to prevent post-operative AF has been controversial. We previously performed a pilot study which suggested that the combination of beta-blockers and bi-atrial pacing (BAP) may reduce AF after cardiac surgery. We prospectively randomized 118 patients to continuous BAP for up to 96 hours post-operatively versus standard therapy. All patients were treated with beta-blockers as tolerated. Patients were paced in the AAI mode at a rate of 100 pulses per minute. The primary endpoint of the study was the occurrence of sustained AF (>10 minutes). There was a significant reduction in the incidence of AF in the BAP group among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery with or without aortic valve replacement (35 % vs. 19 % AF; OR=0.38, 95 % CI 0.15, 0.93; p <0.05). Including patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery (n=7), there remained a strong trend toward a reduction of AF with pacing (no atrial pacing [NAP] vs. BAP; 35 % vs. 21 % AF; OR=0.48, 95 % CI 0.21, 1.11; p=0.08). Patients age 70 or greater benefited most from pacing (NAP vs. BAP; 55 vs. 25 % AF; p<0.05), while those less than 70 years of age did not (17 vs. 18 % p=NS). There was a significant reduction in the amount of time spent in the intensive care unit among patients receiving BAP (50+/-40 vs. 37+/-25 h; p<0.05).BAP together with beta-blockade after coronary artery bypass graft surgery reduces the incidence of post-operative atrial AF. Elderly patients (age 70 or greater) appear to benefit most, and may be a group to whom this therapy should be targeted. The purpose of this study was to determine if atrial pacing is effective in reducing postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF).
                Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a common problem for which medical management has been disappointing. Atrial-based pacing has become an attractive nonpharmacologic therapy for the prevention of AF.
                Sixty-one post-CABG patients (mean age = 65 years) were randomized to one of three groups: no atrial pacing (NAP), right atrial pacing (RAP) or biatrial pacing (BAP). Each patient had one set of atrial wires attached to both the right and left atria, respectively, at the conclusion of surgery. Patients in the RAP and BAP groups were continuously paced at a rate of 100 pulses per minute for 96 h or until the onset of sustained AF (>10 min). All patients were monitored with Holter monitors or full disclosure telemetry to identify the onset of AF. The primary end point of the study was the first onset of sustained AF.
                There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients developing AF in the three groups (NAP = 33%; RAP = 29%; BAP = 37%; p > 0.7). However, for the subset of patients on beta-adrenergic blocking agents after CABG, there was a trend toward less AF in the paced groups. There were no serious complications related to pacing, although in three patients the pacemaker appeared to induce AF by pacing during atrial repolarization.
                Continuous right or biatrial pacing in the postoperative setting is safe and well tolerated. We did not find that post-CABG pacing prevented AF in this pilot study; however, the role of combined pacing and beta-blockade merits further study. Supraventricular arrhythmias continue to complicate the postoperative course of patients undergoing myocardial revascularization. The aim of the study was to identify factors associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and to determine the efficacy of postoperative magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) replacement on the incidence of AF after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) operation.
                Fifty patients undergoing CABG were studied prospectively. Consenting patients with good left ventricular function and without any documented arrhythmias were randomly divided into two groups of 25 patients each in a double-blind fashion. The clinical characteristics of both groups were similar. In the study group, 200 mEq MgSO4 was given for the first 5 postoperative days, in the control group, placebo was given instead of MgSO4.
                Five (20%) patients in the control group and one (4%) patient in the MgSO4 group experienced AF. There was no significant relationship between the development of AF and the following variables: age; sex; diabetes mellitus; hypertension; previous myocardial infarction; smoking; extension of coronary artery disease; aortic cross-clamp time; number of grafts; cardiopulmonary bypass time; postoperative pericarditis; and anemia.
                The use of MgSO4 in early postoperative period is effective in reducing the incidence of AF after CABG in patients with good ventricular function. We assessed the efficacy of postoperatively administered oral Sotalol in preventing the occurrence of postoperative atrial fibrillation.
                Subjects were 80 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) randomized alternately into a Sotalol group (40 patients) administered 80 mg of oral Sotalol daily starting on the postoperative day 1 and continued for 14 days, and a control group (40 patients) matched for age and gender.
                The incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (21 patients) was significantly lower in the Sotalol group (6/40 patients; 15%) than in controls (15/40; 37.5%) (p < 0.05). Significant bradycardia or hypotension, necessitating drug withdrawal, occurred in 3 of 40 (7.5%) patients in the Sotalol group. None in the Sotalol group developed Torsardes de Pointes or sustained ventricular arrhythmias or other severe side effects. The sinus heart rate increased in both groups but less in the Sotalol group. QT, QRS, and QTc durations did not differ between groups. Postoperative hospital stay did not differ between groups.
                Oral Sotalol administration of 80 mg daily was associated with a significant decrease in postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG without appreciable side effects. Sotalol should thus be considered in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing CABG in the absence of heart failure and significant left ventricular dysfunction. One hundred consecutive patients requiring propranolol hydrochloride before undergoing isolated aortocoronary bypass procedures were examined. In half the patients, propranolol therapy was discontinued, whereas the other half continued to receive intraoperative and postoperative propranolol regardless of clinical events. Although there were no preoperative differences in the apparent degree of coronary arterial disease or left ventricular function in the two groups, postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias were less frequent in the propranolol-treated group, most noticeably in those receiving less than 320 mg preoperatively. In patients who had received large preoperative doses (greater than or equal to 320 mg/day), there were no significant differences in postoperative supraventricular tachycardias. Continued propranolol therapy following isolated coronary bypass surgery appears to be a safe and efficacious method of decreasing the incidence of postoperative supraventricular tachycardias. Although there is growing evidence to suggest that the administration of magnesium (Mg2+) to patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and to patients after myocardial infarction is beneficial, the addition of Mg2+ to cardioplegic solutions remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of intermittent warm blood cardioplegia with and without Mg2+ supplementation on the early postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing both elective or urgent CABG.
                Four hundred patients undergoing CABG were prospectively randomized to receive either blood cardioplegia without Mg2+ (BC, n = 200) or supplemented with Mg2+ (BC-Mg2+, n = 200). Serial plasma Mg2+ concentrations were recorded at base line and postoperatively from days 1 to 4.
                Patient characteristics were similar and no significant differences were found in early mortality and morbidity in the two groups. Analysis of 178 patients undergoing urgent CABG for unstable symptoms (BC = 95, BC-Mg2+ = 83) demonstrated a significantly lower requirement for internal defibrillation and temporary epicardial pacing in the BC-Mg2+ group. Furthermore, there was a nearly twofold lower incidence of new postoperative atrial fibrillation in the BC-Mg2+ group compared with the BC group (19% versus 34%, p = 0.03). Postoperative plasma Mg2+ levels were consistently lower in those patients who developed new postoperative atrial fibrillation compared with those who did not (p = 0.05).
                The addition of Mg2+ to warm blood cardioplegia resulted in a lower incidence of intraoperative and postoperative arrhythmias in patients undergoing urgent CABG for unstable angina. To investigate the efficacy of nadolol in the prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, 148 patients undergoing elective CABG were randomized in double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion to receive either nadolol or placebo. The test medication was started on the first postoperative morning and maintained as a single daily dose for 6 weeks. Aside from routine daily clinical evaluation and postoperative electrocardiographic monitoring, patients underwent 24-hour Holter recording once preoperatively and 3 times postoperatively. Seven patients were excluded from the evaluation of efficacy analysis because of insufficient postoperative data. There were no significant differences between the patients receiving nadolol (n = 67) and those receiving placebo (n = 74) with respect to age, preoperative heart rate, previous medications (including beta blockers), incidence of previous myocardial infarction, frequency of preoperative ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, concomitant valvular heart disease, mean cardiopulmonary bypass time, mean aortic cross-clamp time, use of blood and crystalloid cardioplegia, mean number of bypass grafts placed, postoperative use of inotropic agents and catecholamines and incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction. Analysis of postoperative Holter recordings showed that the heart rate was consistently and significantly higher in the placebo group throughout the period of the study (p less than 0.001). The average number of premature atrial contractions was significantly smaller in the nadolol group (p less than 0.05), and nadolol patients had fewer ventricular premature complexes, couplets and non-sustained ventricular tachycardias during the first week postoperatively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) About 30% of patients develop AF after open heart surgery. Biatrial synchronous pacing (BSP) has been shown to promote sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal AF refractory to drug therapy. We conducted a prospective, randomized study to test the effect of BSP via epicardial electrodes on the incidence of AF after heart surgery, as compared to conventional therapy. To apply BSP, we attached two epicardial electrodes to the right and one to the left atrium. Immediately following surgery, BSP was initiated in the AAI-Mode at a rate of 10 beats/min above the underlying rhythm (maximum 110 beats/min) and continued for 3 days, during which the rhythm was continually monitored. After 21 (age 63 +/- 9 years) of the planned 200 patients, the study was prematurely aborted because of the proarrhythmic effect of BSP: 6 of the 12 patients treated with BSP developed sensing failure (P amplitude < 1 mV), which provoked AF in 5 of these 6 patients. BSP was discontinued due to diaphragmal stimulation in two patients and due to ventricular stimulation by a dislocated left atrial electrode in one patient. Two patients in the control group (n = 9) developed AF. Using the available standard technology, BSP via epicardial electrodes is not suitable to suppress AF after heart surgery, primarily due to postoperative deterioration of atrial sensing and its profibrillatory effect. In patients requiring atrial pacing after heart surgery, sensing thresholds must be closely monitored to prevent induction of AF. Sixty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting operations with cold potassium cardioplegia as the method of myocardial preservation either received low-dose oral propranolol (10 mg every 6 hours; 28 patients) or served as controls (32 patients). The study period began after extubation and ended at the time of hospital discharge. On the fourth postoperative day, 24-hour Holter monitoring was performed to assess additional subtle differences in arrhythmias. The overall incidence of symptomatic postoperative arrhythmias was 31% in the control group: 6 patients (19%) had atrial fibrillation or flutter and 4 patients (12%), ventricular arrhythmias. By contrast, 1 patient (4%) in the propranolol group had atrial fibrillation, and no patient had ventricular arrhythmias. The difference in overall arrhythmia rates between the two groups is significant (p less than 0.025). Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring demonstrated no additional differences in the frequency of simple or complex atrial or ventricular ectopy between the two groups. We conclude that the incidence of postoperative arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass operation is diminished by the oral administration of prophylactic low-dose propranolol. When compared with our previous study [1], in which the method of myocardial preservation was intermittent aortic cross-clamping and moderate hypothermia, there is no difference in the overall incidence of postoperative arrhythmias. BACKGROUND: The single most frequent complication after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is the occurrence of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias leading to a prolonged hospital stay. Although several drugs have been used to treat these arrhythmias, effective prevention was only possible with beta-blocking drugs in selected patients. It was, therefore, the aim of the present study to evaluate the significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in presence of today's cardioprotective management in a broad spectrum of patients and to assess the possible preventive effect and safety of low-dose sotalol after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 220 consecutive patients referred for elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to 80 mg sotalol twice daily (n = 110) or matching placebo (n = 110) for 3 months with the first dose given 2 hours before surgery. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Low-dose sotalol reduced the rate of supraventricular arrhythmias from 43% (placebo) to 25% (sotalol, P <.01), which was atrial fibrillation in 83%, flutter in 7%, and other supraventricular arrhythmias in 10%. Only 7% of all arrhythmias were observed after day 9. Hospital stay was 11 +/- 4 days in patients with supraventricular arrhythmias versus 9 +/- 2 days (P <.001) in patients without. On the fourth postoperative day, heart rate was lower in the sotalol group (75 +/- 12 versus 86 +/- 14 beats per min; P <.0001), but QTc was not significantly prolonged (sotalol, 0.44 +/- 0.03; placebo, 0.43 +/- 0.03; P, ns). Study medication had to be discontinued due to side effects in 6.4% of sotalol and 3.6% of placebo patients (P, ns), but relevant side effects occurred only in two sotalol patients late after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that without antiarrhythmic therapy the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is high (43%) and that supraventricular arrhythmias were associated with a prolonged hospital stay (+/-2 days). Prophylactic treatment with low-dose sotalol reduced the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias significantly (by 40%), thereby reducing overall hospital stay in treated patients. Because more than 90% of all supraventricular arrhythmic episodes occurred within 10 days after surgery and considering the small proarrhythmic effect of sotalol late after surgery, prophylactic treatment with sotalol may be recommended for the first 10 postoperative days to safely reduce supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. In patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery (CABGS), occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in the postoperative period and is associated with increased morbidity with longer intensive unit care (ICU) and hospital stay. Prevention with antiarrhythmic drugs is of limited success and associated with significant side effects. Therefore alternative approaches, such as Bachmann Bundle pacing, are required.
                154 consecutive patients, mean age 58±8.8 years, including 134 males and 20 females, were randomized to three groups; Group I : No pacing n= 54, Group II : RA pacing n= 52, Group III : Bachmann Bundle pacing n= 48. All the groups were well matched with regard to age, left atrial size, ejection fraction and use of beta blockers. Patients in Groups II and III were continually paced at a rate of 100 beats per minute (bpm) or at 10 bpm more than patients' intrinsic heart rate. All the patients were monitored for 72 hours by telemetry and occurrence of AF was noted. Incidence of AF was 0% (none of 48 patients) in Group III as compared to 16.6% in Group I (9 of 54 patients) (p 0.003) and 12.5% in Group II (5 of 52 patients) (p 0.03). There was a trend towards shorter ICU stay in Group III (3.9 days) as compared to Group II (4.5 days) and Group I (4.1 days). Among the three groups, the reduction in mean P wave duration also was greater in Bachmann bundle paced group.
                In patients undergoing CABGS, Bachmann bundle pacing is superior to right atrial / no pacing in the post operative period for preventing occurrence of AF and reducing ICU stay, commensurate with a reduction in mean P wave duration on surface ECG. To determine whether magnesium administration is effective in reducing postoperative morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                A tertiary acute-care 500-bed university teaching hospital.
                Over a 6-month period, 100 patients electively scheduled for cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass were studied.
                Fifty patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of magnesium chloride, 2 g, and 50 patients received placebo intraoperatively after the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass.
                Magnesium-treated patients had a significantly decreased frequency (P < .04) of postoperative ventricular dysrhythmias (eight [16%] of 50) compared with placebo-treated patients (17 [34%] of 50). Patients who were normomagnesemic postoperatively had new supraventricular dysrhythmias less frequently (P < .03) than patients who were hypomagnesemic postoperatively (eight [17%] of 48 vs 19 [37%] of 52). Compared with placebo-treated patients, magnesium-treated patients had significantly higher (P < .02) postoperative cardiac indices in the intensive care unit (2.8 +/- 0.1 vs 2.5 +/- 0.1 L/min per m2). Patients with postoperative total and ultrafilterable hypomagnesemia had postoperative ventricular dysrhythmias (P < .04) and required prolonged mechanical ventilatory support (P < .01) more frequently than patients without postoperative hypomagnesemia.
                Total and ultrafilterable hypomagnesemia are prevalent findings in cardiac surgery patients, and postoperative hypomagnesemia is strongly associated with clinically important morbidity. Magnesium administration decreased the frequency of postoperative ventricular dysrhythmias and increased the stroke volume and thereby cardiac index in the early postoperative period. Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are common after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and may have deleterious hemodynamic consequences. To determine if acebutolol, a cardioselective beta-blocking drug, prevents such tachyarrhythmias after CABG, 100 consecutive patients, aged 30 to 77 years (mean +/- standard deviation 53 +/- 9), were entered into a randomized, controlled study. Exclusion criteria were: contraindications to beta-blocking drugs, left ventricular aneurysm, major renal failure, history of cardiac arrhythmia and cardiac arrhythmia during the immediate postoperative period. From 36 hours after surgery until discharge (usually on the seventh day), 50 patients were given 200 mg of acebutolol (or 400 mg if weight was more than 80 kg) orally twice a day (dosage than modified to maintain a heart rate at rest between 60 and 90 beats/min). The 50 patients in the control group did not receive beta-blocking drugs after CABG. The 2 groups were comparable in angina functional class, ejection fraction, number of diseased vessels, antianginal therapy before CABG, number of bypassed vessels and duration of cardiopulmonary bypass All patients were clinically evaluated twice daily and had continuous electrocardiographic monitoring and daily electrocardiograms. A 24-hour continuous electrocardiogram was recorded in the last 20 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Two hundred twenty-three patients were randomly selected to receive propranolol, 10 mg orally every 6 hours, or to serve as controls after coronary artery bypass grafting. The study began at the time of discharge from the intensive care unit. Patients were ineligible if they had cardiac arrhythmias while in the intensive care unit, low cardiac output requiring catecholamine support, or bradycardia requiring a pacemaker. In the control group, cardiac arrhythmias for which treatment was necessary developed in 31 of 136 patients (23%), atrial fibrillation or flutter in 24 patients (18%), and ventricular arrhythmias in 7 (5%). In the group receiving propranolol, cardiac arrhythmias requiring treatment developed in 9 of 87 patients (10%), atrial fibrillation or flutter in 7 (8%), and ventricular arrhythmias in 2 (2%). The difference in frequency with which cardiac arrhythmias occurred between the two groups is significantly different (p less than 0.05). We conclude that propranolol is effective in the prevention of cardiac arrhythmias following coronary artery bypass grafting. Arrhythmias are very common after cardiac surgery and are multifactorial. Magnesium is receiving increased consideration in the management of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. This study was designed to evaluate the role of magnesium in preventing arrhythmias in hypokalemic (K < 3.5 mEq/L) and normokalemic (K > 3.5 mEq/L) patients with normal renal and ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). One hundred forty patients ranging from 32 to 71 years of age who were scheduled for CABG were studied. They were divided into four groups: group I (control) received no magnesium; group II received 10 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate intravenously before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); group III received 10 mg/kg of magnesium soon after CPB; group IV received 10 mg/kg of magnesium before and after CPB. Serum potassium and catecholamine levels, as well as serum and urine magnesium levels, were measured and the incidence and type of arrhythmias were determined. There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of arrhythmias between the groups studied. The incidence of arrhythmias was highest in groups I and II and lowest in group IV (12 patients in group I, 14 in group II, 5 in group III; and 1 in group IV). Magnesium levels were higher in group IV than any other group studied after completion of surgery. There was no difference in serum and urine magnesium levels between the hypokalemic and normokalemic patients within each group. Serum magnesium returned to normal in all patients after 48 hours. Therefore, it appears that administration of magnesium during and after cardiac surgery reduces the incidence of arrhythmias in hypokalemic and normokalemic patients. Sixty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery were studied prospectively in order to investigate the effect of a cardioselective beta-blocker on the incidence of postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias. Patients with good left ventricular function were randomly divided into two groups: 30 patients treated with atenolol and 30 patients acting as controls. Atrial fibrillation was seen in 11 patients and frequent premature atrial extrasystoles were noted in one. Eleven (37%) patients in the control group experienced arrhythmias whilst atenolol significantly reduced this incidence to 3% (one patient), P = 0.001. There was no significant relationship between the development of supraventricular arrhythmias and the following variables: age, sex, severity of preoperative symptoms, previous myocardial infarction, extent of coronary artery disease, technique of myocardial preservation used, ischaemic time, number and site of saphenous vein grafts, endarterectomies performed and perioperative serum potassium levels. It is concluded that the use of atenolol (started 72 h before operation) is effective in reducing the incidence of supraventricular arrhythmias following elective coronary artery bypass operations in patients with good left ventricular function. Ninety patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were studied prospectively by bedside and subsequent ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to investigate the incidence, possible causes, and prevention of atrial fibrillation. Patients with good left ventricular function were divided randomly into a control group or groups treated with digoxin or propranolol. In the control group the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 27% and of significant ventricular extrasystoles 3%. Propranolol reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation (14.8%), whereas digoxin had no effect and increased the incidence of ventricular extrasystoles. Age, sex, severity of symptoms, cardiomegaly, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, and number of grafts did not affect the result. The operative myocardial ischaemic time was related to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. There was also a significant relation between atrial fibrillation and bundle branch block. Atrial fibrillation is common after coronary artery grafting; it may be due to diffuse myocardial ischaemia or hypothermic injury. The incidence may be reduced by beta blockade.
Prophylaxis to prevent atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery with any of the studied pharmacological or non-pharmacological interventions may be favored because of its reduction in the rate of atrial fibrillation, decrease in the length of stay and cost of hospital treatment and a possible decrease in the rate of stroke. However, this review is limited by the quality of the available data and heterogeneity between the included studies. Selection of appropriate interventions may depend on the individual patient situation and should take into consideration adverse effects and the cost associated with each approach.