L-deprenyl in the treatment of mild dementia of the Alzheimer type: preliminary results. Effects of a MAO-B inhibitor in the treatment of Alzheimer disease. CBF and cognitive evaluation of Alzheimer type patients before and after IMAO-B treatment: a pilot study. Neuropsychological effects of L-deprenyl in Alzheimer's type dementia. Selegiline in the treatment of behavioural disturbance in Alzheimer's disease. L-deprenyl therapy improves verbal memory in amnesic Alzheimer patients. Alzheimer-type dementia and verbal memory performances: influence of selegiline therapy. Effects of monoamine oxidase inhibition by selegiline on concentrations of noradrenaline and monoamine metabolites in CSF of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Selegiline treatment and the extent of degenerative changes in brain tissue of patients with Alzheimer's disease. A strategy of "combination chemotherapy" in Alzheimer's disease: rationale and preliminary results with physostigmine plus deprenyl. Short-term administration of selegiline for mild-to-moderate dementia of the Alzheimer's type.
To examine the short-term cognitive and behavioral effects of L-deprenyl in persons with mild dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) over a 2-month period.
                A 15-month randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a parallel-group design. This report deals with the first 2 months of the trial.
                39 subjects with mild DAT (CDR 1) selected using NINCDS-ADRDA criteria.
                A battery of neuropsychological tests and clinical rating scales.
                The placebo and L-deprenyl subjects were similar at baseline on the clinical and neuropsychological tests. There was no evidence of a L-deprenyl effect on any clinical or neuropsychological measures after 2 months.
                L-deprenyl did not have a measurable impact on behavior or cognitive function over a 2-month period in this group of subjects with mild DAT. 119 patients were enrolled in a double-blind randomized parallel study versus placebo carried out to assess both the efficacy and tolerability of L-deprenyl (10 mg/day) for treatment of patients with organic mental disorders of the Alzheimer type (DAT). The treatments were given for 3 months, starting after a run-in period of 15 days to evaluate efficacy. A complete neuropsychological battery was administered monthly after the start of treatment whereas tolerability was assessed by checking, recording and classifying all the unfavorable experiences occurring. According to the results, L-deprenyl would seem to be a useful and reliable tool for the treatment of DAT patients in an attempt to improve their cognitive functions and reduce behavioral alterations, without frequent or severe side effects. Ten patients diagnosed as affected by primary degenerative dementia of the Alzheimer type, with a mild to moderate cognitive and behavioral impairment, were studied in a double blind design when taking for 60 days 5 mg twice a day of L-deprenyl or placebo. Cognitive functions and cerebral blood flow were assessed at the beginning and at the end of treatment by a wide array of memory, attention, and language efficiency measures and by SPECT-99TcHMPAO procedure. Reduced CBF on the parietal lobes was demonstrated in the patients at baseline together with a reduction of memory and cognitive efficiency. At the end of the treatment patients who received L-deprenyl showed an improvement in cognitive efficiency and no changes in CBF, while patients treated with placebo showed a worsening of cognitive efficiency and further reduction of parietal lobe CBF. The monoaminergic neurotransmission defect seen in dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) is linked to a known increased activity of type B cerebral monoamine oxidases (MAO-Bs). The use of drugs that are able to block this abnormal activity could therefore be useful in the treatment of some cognitive deficits that characterize DAT. Twenty patients with a clinical diagnosis of DAT and with a slight-moderate mental deterioration were treated with 10 mg/day of L-deprenyl, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, according to a double-blind crossover design vs. placebo. Initial treatment (drug or placebo) was randomly assigned. The patients' cognitive functions were evaluated at baseline and then after 3 and 6 months of treatment with drug or placebo. The patients crossed over treatment after 3 months, without a washout interval. The results of the study show the higher and statistically significant effects of L-deprenyl on memory and attention that seem to be due to an improved function of the monoaminergic systems involved in the process of neuronal degeneration. The purpose of this study was to examine the behavioural and cognitive effects of selegiline in a group of moderately behaviourally disturbed AD patients.
                This was a 14-week randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of selegiline (10 mg) and placebo.
                An outpatient clinic in an urban-based tertiary referral centre in the USA.
                Twenty-five outpatients meeting NINCDS criteria for probable Alzheimer's disease with associated behavioural disturbance.
                The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS) and the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (Cognitive) (ADAS-COG).
                In the primary analysis, improvement on the BPRS and DMAS scores with selegeline treatment did not. reach statistical significance. A secondary analysis using a parallel design showed a significant benefit of drug treatment on BPRS scores with a trend towards improvement on the DMAS. Among the 10 subjects who could be tested, there was a significant improvement in cognitive function on the ADAS-COG with selegiline compared to placebo.
                Short-term selegiline treatment produced an improvement in behaviour and had a significant effect on cognition in a subset of testable patients. Altered monoaminergic neurotransmission could play an important role in the cognitive dysfunctions typical of dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). DAT is not, however, a homogenous phenomenon inasmuch as two forms are distinguishable: early onset (EO) and late onset (LO). Moreover, focal patterns of neuropsychological deterioration fall into various subgroups. According to our hypothesis, DAT patients, who at the onset of the disease mainly manifest memory disorders, also represent a specific subgroup characterized by impaired cortically projecting catecholaminergic pathways. In a 6-month randomized, double-blind, cross-over study versus placebo we analysed the influence of L-deprenyl on the verbal memory of 19 amnesic EO-DAT patients. Verbal memory was assessed by means of the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test. The results obtained show significantly better performances for L-deprenyl treated patients in learning and long-term memory skills. We suggest that L-deprenyl, through selective inhibition of MAO-B and by increasing the activity of the catecholaminergic systems, positively influences cognitive functions and behaviour founded on memory efficiency. In a double blind randomized crossover trial lasting 6 months selegiline, a selective MAO-B inhibitor, was tested against placebo for activity on verbal memory performances in Alzheimer-type dementia (DAT). Verbal memory was assessed with the Rey-Auditory-Verbal Learning Test at the start of treatment, at the time scheduled for crossover (90 days) and at the end of the trial (180 days). The results suggest that selegiline possesses significant activity on some memory parameters, which seems to depend on an improvement both in information processing abilities and in learning strategies at the moment of acquisition. A double-blind, cross-over trial with 12 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) was carried out primarily to test the suitability of this design in the investigation of the clinical effects of selegiline (10 mg/day) in AD. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples for the determination of concentrations of noradrenaline (NA) and several monoamine metabolites were collected at baseline and at the end of both four-week treatment periods (placebo and selegiline). The severity of dementia was assessed using Ferm's and Gottfries-Bråne-Steen (GBS) dementia scales. The concentrations of the dopamine metabolite, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC) and the NA metabolites, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG), and 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl glycol (MHPG) decreased significantly during selegiline treatment. There was a clear trend of reduction in concentrations of homovanillic acid (HVA) during selegiline treatment, whereas the concentrations of NA, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), and tryptophan did not differ significantly. The study design was not suitable for the analysis of the clinical results as there was a significant carry-over effect in both scales. As only the first period data could be used in the analysis, there were no significant differences in the scores of Ferm's or GBS scales, but clear positive trends could be detected in favour of selegiline. A beneficial effect of selegiline (L-deprenyl) in Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been reported in several clinical studies.
                The brain tissue from 17 deceased patients, members of a double-blind clinical trial to assess the potential benefit of selegiline in AD, were analysed.
                In our study, the decrease in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores during the progress of the disease had been significantly influenced by selegiline treatment. Prior to death, the MMSE scores were significantly higher in those patients receiving selegiline than in those receiving placebo. However, according to our results, none of the lesions critical for AD diagnosis, such as counts of senile/neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles or beta-A4 load, were influenced by the selegiline treatment.
                In conclusion, according to our study, mechanisms other than neuronal degeneration seen as lesions critical for AD diagnosis are influenced by selegiline treatment, leading to the functional benefit found in AD. Although the central cholinergic deficits are still considered to be of primary importance in Alzheimer's disease, there is great need for an expansion of the pharmacological approach in this illness beyond the simple cholinergic replacement hypothesis. This report focuses on the concept of "combination chemotherapy" in Alzheimer's disease as the next generation of therapeutic strategies. Based on earlier positive findings in Alzheimer patients with the monoamine oxidase B inhibitor, 1-deprenyl, the authors speculate that a combination of physostigmine, the short-acting cholinesterase inhibitor, and 1-deprenyl might be more beneficial than either agent alone. The authors outline a sample paradigm for such combination studies, report preliminary data on the first 16 Alzheimer subjects to have received an initial combination of physostigmine and deprenyl, and point to other possible "combination chemotherapy" strategies for future study. As a follow-up to an earlier study showing short-term benefit in inpatients with more severe dementia, the authors studied the short-term cognitive, functional, and behavioral effects of selegiline in outpatients with mild-to-moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) by means of a double-blind, randomized, crossover study of placebo vs. selegiline. Fifty outpatients with mild-to-moderate DAT and no behavioral disturbances were given selegiline in two 8-week treatment periods separated by a 4-week washout. Outcome was assessed with standardized measures of dementia severity, daily functioning, behavior, and cognition. There was no drug-placebo difference in any outcome measure. Selegiline did not show short-term benefit in this study, contrary to the earlier study, perhaps because the patients were studied less intensively and/or lacked behavioral problems that could show response, although the medication was well tolerated.
Despite its initial promise, i.e. the potential neuroprotective properties, and its role in the treatment of Parkinson's disease sufferers, selegiline for Alzheimer's disease has proved disappointing. Although there is no evidence of a significant adverse event profile, there is also no evidence of a clinically meaningful benefit for Alzheimer's disease sufferers. This is true irrespective of the outcome measure evaluated, i.e. cognition, emotional state, activities of daily living, and global assessment, whether in the short, or longer term (up to 69 weeks), where this has been assessed. There would seem to be no justification, therefore, to use it in the treatment of people with Alzheimer's disease, nor for any further studies of its efficacy in Alzheimer's disease.