[Isoflurane anesthesia with combined use of low dose fentanyl for open heart surgery]. Similar pain scores after early and late extubation in heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. An economic evaluation of propofol/fentanyl compared with midazolam/fentanyl on recovery in the ICU following cardiac surgery. Short-stay intensive care after coronary artery bypass surgery: randomized clinical trial on safety and cost-effectiveness. Early extubation following coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. The Fast Track Cardiac Care Team. Early versus late extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: effects on cognitive function. Extubation time, hemodynamic stability, and postoperative pain control in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery: an evaluation of fentanyl, remifentanil, and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs with propofol for perioperative and postoperative management. Propofol-based versus fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Closed-circuit isoflurane-based anesthesia provides better fast-tracking anesthesia than fentanyl/propofol-based anesthesia for off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Propofol and fentanyl anaesthesia for patients with low cardiac output state undergoing cardiac surgery: comparison with high-dose fentanyl anaesthesia. Optimization of mechanical ventilation support following cardiac surgery. Postoperative pulmonary function in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients undergoing early tracheal extubation: a comparison between short-term mechanical ventilation and early extubation. Randomized trial of primary anesthetic agents on outcome of coronary artery bypass operations. Randomized controlled trial comparing adaptive-support ventilation with pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation with automode in weaning patients after cardiac surgery. Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Remifentanil, fentanyl, and cardiac surgery: a double-blinded, randomized, controlled trial of costs and outcomes. Hemodynamic effects, myocardial ischemia, and timing of tracheal extubation with propofol-based anesthesia for cardiac surgery. Postoperative respiratory care: a controlled trial of early and late extubation following coronary-artery bypass grafting. Change in anaesthesia practice and postoperative sedation shortens ICU and hospital length of stay following coronary artery bypass surgery. Minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia benefits patients undergoing coronary revascularization via preventing hyperglycemia and maintaining metabolic homeostasis. Early vs conventional extubation after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Myocardial ischaemia after coronary artery bypass grafting: early vs late extubation. A comparison of the effect of high- and low-dose fentanyl on the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass surgery in the elderly. Comparative effects of propofol versus fentanyl on cerebral oxygenation state during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
The hemodynamic and respiratory effects of high dose fentanyl anesthesia and those of isoflurane anesthesia with combined use of low dose fentanyl were compared in 40 patients undergoing open heart surgery. Twenty patients (Group Fen) were anesthetized with high dose fentanyl (about 100 micrograms.kg-1), other twenty patients (Group Iso) were anesthetized with isoflurane (inhalation of 1.0-2.0%) combined with low dose fentanyl (about 8 micrograms.kg-1). Between the two groups, there were no significant differences in HR, CI, SVI, MPAP, MRAP, PVRI, RVCWI, LVSWI, DO2I, SvO2, and P/F ratio. In group Iso, there were significant decreases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) at the time of sternotomy and before the cardiopulmonary bypass. In group Fen, a significant increase in VO2I occurred at the time of sternotomy. In ICU, catecholamine concentrations were significantly lower, and the duration of its use was significantly shorter in group Iso. Group Iso required significantly less time to awakening and to extubating. Therefore, group Iso shortened the length of ICU stays. In conclusion, isoflurane with combined use of low dose fentanyl anesthesia is an acceptable method of anesthesia for open heart surgery. To investigate if early extubation, 2 hours after surgery, would result in more postoperative pain or in an increased use of opioid analgesics compared with late extubation, 6 hours after surgery.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                Intensive care unit, university hospital.
                Sixty patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.
                Patients were randomized into 2 groups: extubation at about 2 (early) or 6 (late) hours. Anesthesia was based on propofol and remifentanil. There was no epidural analgesia and no local anesthesia in the wound. A bolus of the opioid ketobemidone was administered toward the end of surgery followed by a continuous infusion.
                Pain, provoked during deep breathing or coughing, evaluated with a visual analog scale (VAS) going from 0 to 10, was measured after extubation, and at 8 and 16 hours after surgery. Unprovoked pain was measured hourly. If VAS was greater than 3, the infusion rate was increased and a bolus of ketobemidone was given. Three patients in the late group were excluded because of incomplete data. Pain did not differ between the early and late groups at any time. In all patients, 21 never scored >3, 11 scored >3 once, and 25 scored >3 more than once. Nine patients had 1 score >5. The amount of ketobemidone was similar in both groups.
                Early extubation had no negative effect on the quality of postoperative pain control and was not followed by an increased use of analgesics. A comparison was made of the drug costs and nursing dependency of patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery and routine postoperative recovery for two anaesthetic techniques using either propofol with low dose fentanyl or midazolam with high dose fentanyl. Estimates of resource use were based on a randomised clinical trial undertaken at the Northern General Hospital, Sheffield. Times from entry to the intensive care unit until extubation and discharge were recorded for 70 patients and were transformed to nursing shifts. Nursing dependency was calculated on the basis of one nurse per ventilated patient and 0.5 nurse from the start of the shift after extubation. Nursing costs were allocated on the basis of the patient's status at the beginning of each shift in line with the hospital's staffing policy. All drugs used from the morning of the operation until discharge were recorded. Costs of nursing and drugs were calculated. The total cost of patients in the propofol group was 13.3% less than midazolam patients (p = 0.043, for geometric means Cl 0.4% to 27.8%). The clinical study was not designed for economic endpoints; however, it demonstrated achievable savings in propofol-treated patients. To evaluate the safety and cost-effectiveness of short-stay intensive care (SSIC) treatment for low-risk coronary artery bypass patients.
                Randomized clinical equivalence trial.
                University Hospital Maastricht, the Netherlands.
                Low-risk coronary artery bypass patients.
                A total of 600 patients were randomly assigned to undergo either SSIC treatment (8 hrs of intensive care treatment) or control treatment (care as usual, overnight intensive care treatment).
                The primary outcome measures were intensive care readmissions and total hospital stay. The secondary outcome measures were total hospital costs, quality of life, postoperative morbidity, and mortality. Hospital costs consisted of the cost of hospital admission or admissions and outpatient costs.
                The difference in intensive care readmission between the two groups of 1.13% was very small and not significantly different (p = .241; 95% confidence interval, -0.9% to 2.9%). The total hospital stay (p = .807; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to -0.4) and postoperative morbidity were comparable between the groups. The SSIC group's quality of life improved more compared with the control group's quality of life (p = .0238; 95% confidence interval, 0.0012 to 0.0464). The total hospital costs for SSIC were significantly lower (95% confidence interval, -1,581 to -174) compared with those for the control group (4,625 and 5,441, respectively). The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (cost/delta quality-adjusted life months) thus showed the dominance of SSIC. Bootstrap and sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the study findings.
                Compared with usual care, SSIC is a safe and cost-effective approach. SSIC can be considered as an alternative for conventional postoperative intensive care treatment for low-risk coronary artery bypass graft patients. To determine the safety of early extubation (EE) after coronary artery surgery.
                Prospective randomized controlled trial.
                The cardiac surgery operating room and ICU of a university-affiliated teaching hospital.
                One hundred eligible patients presenting for elective coronary artery surgery.
                Patients randomized to the EE group were administered a reduced dose of fentanyl (15 microg/kg) and an anesthetic compatible with EE, while patients randomized to the conventional extubation (CE) group were given fentanyl (50 microg/kg).
                The time to extubation in the EE group (median, 240 min; range, 30 to 930 min) was significantly less than the CE group (median, 420 min; range, 125 to 1,140 min) (p<0.01). Twenty patients were withdrawn from the study according to protocol guidelines. There were no cases of reintubation or complications attributable to EE.
                By using an appropriate anesthetic technique and postoperative management, EE can be achieved following coronary artery bypass surgery without major complications. To compare the effects of a short period of mechanical ventilation and sedation and a longer one on cognitive functioning of patients exposed to cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
                A randomized, prospective study.
                Tertiary-care university hospital.
                Forty-eight adult patients with surgical coronary artery disease.
                Elective coronary artery bypass surgery.
                Patients (n = 48; mean age, 60.12+/-9.30 years) were randomized to either group I (mean delay, 3.49+/-2.21 hours) or group II (mean delay, 10.32+/-1.75 hours). Cognitive functioning was evaluated before surgery, postoperatively, and at the 8-week follow-up. Tests included measures of central nervous system integrity, attention/concentration and psychomotor performance, verbal fluency, visual scanning speed, mental flexibility, auditory and visual attention, and verbal memory. Covariance analyses were used for group comparisons. Covariates were age, education, and baseline or postoperative performance. No differences in cognitive functioning were found between the two groups. Globally, performance deteriorated for 34.1% of the patients at the posttest evaluation, whereas 2.3% improved and 63.6% remained unchanged. At follow-up, nearly 40.5% of the patients showed an improvement from baseline, 2.4% still had deficits, and 57.1% had no change. None of the cognitive functions appeared to be more affected than others.
                Early extubation and a shortened period of anesthesia/analgesia do not appear to positively or negatively affect cognitive functioning at 3 to 5 days and 8 weeks postoperatively. Early extubation is suggested because it has no deleterious effect (besides the low risk for reintubation) and it may facilitate patients' care in the intensive care unit. To compare three anesthetic strategies with respect to the time of extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and to assess patient satisfaction with the procedure.
                Prospective, randomized, clinical study.
                Tertiary-care referral center.
                180 cardiac surgical patients undergoing primary CABG from January through June 2004.
                After induction of general anesthesia, patients were allocated to one of three groups. All three groups received a continuous infusion of intravenous (IV) propofol perioperatively and postoperatively. Group 1 (fentanyl infusion group, n = 60) received continuous IV fentanyl infusion perioperatively and postoperatively for analgesia. Group 2 (diclofenac group, n = 60) received fentanyl bolus doses intraoperatively and diclofenac suppository postoperatively. Group 3 (remifentanil group, n = 60) received continuous infusion of IV remifentanil perioperatively and IV fentanyl as an immediate postoperative bolus followed by continuous fentanyl infusion. Duration of postoperative ventilation up to the time of extubation, inotrope requirement, time at which analgesic infusion was discontinued, postextubation arterial blood gas analysis, pain evaluation via visual analog scale, need for rescue analgesia, awareness during surgery, and length of postcardiac surgical unit stay, were evaluated in each patient.
                The diclofenac group exhibited the shortest time to extubation, the least inotrope use, and the fewest rescue doses of analgesic than did patients of the other two groups.
                Intravenous propofol with bolus doses of IV fentanyl intraoperatively in combination with postoperative nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs had the best recovery profile in patients undergoing primary CABG than did the other two regimens studied. To evaluate drug costs, time of mechanical ventilation, complications, and hospital length of stay comparing propofol-based with fentanyl-isoflurane-based anesthesia.
                A prospective, randomized study.
                A university-affiliated, tertiary care community hospital.
                Seventy patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass surgery. Interventions: Patients were randomized to either a low-dose fentanyl-isoflurane or a lower-dose fentanyl-isoflurane anesthetic supplemented with a continuous infusion of propofol.
                Fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia was significantly less expensive ($50.03+/-$27.26 v $121.69+/-$31.40) for anesthesia drugs and ($58.08+/-$27.39 v $129.91+/-$31.52) for total drug costs. There was also a trend for patients in the fentanyl-isoflurane group to be extubated slightly sooner (388+/-202 v 449+/-252 min) and go home sooner (5.1+/-1.8 v 6.0+/-3.0 days).
                Fentanyl-isoflurane provides an inexpensive anesthetic that permits as prompt an extubation as propofol, thus conserving resources for other patients. In recent years, low-dose fentanyl combined with short-acting hypnotic drug has been thought to be better than traditional high-dose fentanyl in cardiac anesthesia. On the other hand, the practice of closed-circuit inhaled anesthesia offers many advantages, including hemodynamic stability, maintenance of adequate anesthesia depth and early recovery. This study sought to evaluate the effect of closed-circuit isoflurane-based anesthesia (CIA) and fentanyl/propofol-based anesthesia (FPA) on off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery.
                Fifty patients scheduled for elective OPCABG surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either CIA (n = 25) or FPA (n = 25). In the CIA group, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 2 microg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg, followed by 2% isoflurane in oxygen (oxygen flow rate = 3 L/min) via mask ventilation for 30 min. Pancuronium 0.1-0.15 mg/kg was given thereafter to facilitate endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained by isoflurane in a minimal oxygen flow of 300 mL/min, with the vaporizer adjusted to deliver 3%-5% concentration. In the FPA group, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 10-15 microg/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg; and pancuronium 0.1-0.15mg/kg was used for endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained by propofol 2-6 mg/kg/hr and fentanyl 1-2 microg/kg/hr, and an incremental bolus of i.v. propofol 20 mg was given if the patient's mean blood pressure (MBP) exceeded 85 mmHg. An inotropic agent was given if the patient's MBP dropped below 65 mmHg or if the patient experienced a decrease in MBP greater than 20% of the preinduction value. The time of extubation, length of stay in the intensive care unit, and inotropic requirements were recorded.
                The patients in the CIA group were extubated earlier than those in the FPA group (281.3 +/- 32.5 min versus 311.3 +/- 38.5 min, respectively; P < 0.05), although there was no statistical difference in the length of stay in the intensive care unit (29.6 +/- 4.8 hr versus 30.1 +/- 7.6 hr, respectively; P = 0.4). The use of inotropic agent in the CIA group was less than in the FPA group (16% vs. 56%, P < 0.01). Dopamine requirement was less in the CIA group than in the FPA group (0.8 +/- 0.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 0.4 microg/kg/min, respectively; P < 0.01).
                These results suggest that CIA, as compared with FPA, provides a significant reduction in the time to extubation after OPCABG surgery with less use of inotropic agents. We have compared the haemodynamic effects of an infusion of propofol 8 mg kg-1 h-1 followed by 4 mg kg-1 h-1 and fentanyl 15 micrograms kg-1 (group 1) with midazolam 3-6 mg and fentanyl 60 micrograms kg-1 (group 2) in patients with a low cardiac output state undergoing cardiac surgery. Heart rate was lower in group 1 throughout the period before cardiopulmonary bypass. There were no significant differences between the groups in other measured variables. Arterial pressure decreased in both groups after induction, by 21% in group 1 and 18% in group 2. Thermodilution assessment of right ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged. Myocardial contractility was not affected adversely. Patients in group 1 who received an infusion of propofol and a smaller dose of fentanyl awakened sooner and the trachea was extubated earlier. Mechanical ventilation (MV) is essential in the management of patients that underwent cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. It has been demonstrated that MV dependence is directly related to morbidity incidence and ICU length of stay, with a strong impact on economic cost. Therefore identification of measures that can reduce MV interval, may reduce the incidence of respiratory complications and length of hospitalization. The aim of this study was to identify weaning indexes and adopt a weaning algorithm in order to optimize ventilatory support after cardiac surgery.
                Forty-nine patients with low and medium Higgins risk score, who underwent, between February and November 1999, elective surgery at our Institution, were enrolled in this study. All patients were randomized into 2 groups: Group I (weaning group - 24 patients), extubated with the aid of a weaning protocol, and Group II (control group - 25 patients), extubated with conservative weaning, dependent on the physician's subjective clinical judgment. All patients were successfully weaned from mechanical support.
                Intubation time was significantly lower in Group I than Group II and "Fast Track Recovery" group (p=0.05). ICU length of stay was also significantly lower in Group I (p=0.03). Analysis of weaning indexes did not show cut-off points predictive of successful weaning, except for PaO2/FiO2 ratio, which was higher in Group I (p=0.02).
                These results confirm that the use of a weaning algorithm enables the MV interval and hospital length of stay to be shortened, suggesting that it should be used in the management following cardiac surgery. To evaluate the effect of a short period of mechanical ventilation (3 hours) versus immediate extubation (within 1 hour of surgery) on pulmonary function, gas exchange, and pulmonary complications after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
                Prospective randomized study.
                University teaching hospital.
                Thirty-five patients undergoing CABG surgery.
                Patients were randomized into 2 groups. Patients in group I were extubated as soon as possible after surgery. Patients in group II were ventilated for a minimum of 3 hours after surgery. Patients in both groups were extubated only after achieving predetermined extubation criteria. Patients who did not meet the criteria for extubation within the predetermined set time limit (90 minutes in group I and 6 hours in group II) were withdrawn from the study. Pulmonary function tests (vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, total lung capacity, functional residual capacity), arterial blood gases, and chest radiographs were done preoperatively and postoperatively. Pulmonary complications were recorded.
                Demographic data were similar between groups. The mean time to extubation in group I was 45.7 plus minus 27.6 minutes and in group II was 201.4 plus minus 21 minutes (p < 0.01). Two patients in group I and 1 patient in group II did not meet the extubation criteria within the predetermined set time limit and were excluded from the study. In both groups, there was a significant decline in pulmonary function but no differences between groups at 24 or 72 hours after surgery. There were no differences between groups in blood gases, atelectasis scores, or pulmonary complications.
                The data suggest that extending mechanical ventilation after CABG surgery does not affect pulmonary function. Provided that routine extubation criteria are met, patients can be safely extubated early (within 1 hour) after major cardiac surgery without concerns of further pulmonary derangement.
                Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved. To examine the role of primary anesthetic agent on outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting operations, 1,012 patients were prospectively randomized to receive enflurane (257), halothane (253), isoflurane (248), or sufentanil (254). Except for administration of the primary anesthetic, anesthesia management was standardized for all patients. The randomized groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, extent of coronary artery disease, chronic antianginal therapy, hemodynamic characteristics including new myocardial ischemia at arrival to the operating room, and surgical characteristics that might influence the rate of postoperative myocardial infarction or death. From anesthetic induction to start of cardiopulmonary bypass, new ST segment depression appeared in 310 (30.4%) patients and was not different among primary anesthetic groups (28.0-33.5%). Similarly, the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction (3.6-4.7%) and death (1.2-2.4%) was not different. Although intraoperative hypotension was twice as common in patients receiving any volatile anesthetic and hypertension twice as common with sufentanil, tachycardia (greater than or equal to 110 bpm) was not related to any primary anesthetic (4.3-9.1%) and was the only hemodynamic abnormality significantly related to intraoperative ischemia. The strongest predictor of intraoperative ischemia was ischemia on arrival to the operating room. The authors postulate that approximately 90% of new myocardial ischemia observed during anesthesia is the manifestation of silent ischemia observed in patients before operation and only 10% is related to anesthetic management. They conclude that, despite differences in the hemodynamic consequences of the primary anesthetics studied, none of the primary anesthetics influenced outcome and the primary role of the anesthesiologist in management of these patients is control of heart rate. Adaptive-support ventilation (ASV) is a minute ventilation-controlled mode governed by a closed-loop algorithm. With ASV, tidal volume and respiratory rate are automatically adjusted to minimize work of breathing. Studies indicate that ventilation in ASV enables more rapid weaning. The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to determine whether ventilation in ASV results in a shorter time to extubation than pressure-regulated volume-controlled ventilation with automode (PRVCa) after cardiac surgery.
                Fifty patients were randomly assigned to ASV or PRVCa after elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Respiratory weaning progressed through three phases: phase 1 (controlled ventilation), phase 2 (assisted ventilation), and phase 3 (T-piece trial), followed by extubation. The primary outcome was duration of intubation (sum of phases 1-3). Secondary outcomes were duration of mechanical ventilation (sum of phases 1 and 2), number of arterial blood gas samples, and manual ventilator setting changes made before extubation.
                Forty-eight patients completed the study. The median duration of intubation was significantly shorter in the ASV group than in the PRVCa group (300 [205-365] vs. 540 [462-580] min; P < 0.05). This difference was due to a reduction in the duration of mechanical ventilation (165 [120-195] vs. 480 [360-510] min; P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the ASV and PRVCa groups in the number of arterial blood gas samples taken or manual ventilator setting changes made.
                ASV is associated with earlier extubation, without an increase in clinician intervention, when compared with PRVCa in patients undergoing uncomplicated cardiac surgery. We undertook a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate morbidity outcomes and safety of a modified anesthetic technique to provide shorter sedation and early extubation (1 to 6 hours) than those of the conventional anesthetic protocol used for prolonged sedation and extubation (12 to 22 hours) in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting.
                One hundred twenty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively assigned randomly to either an early extubation group (n = 60; 15 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl and 2 to 6 mg.kg-1.hour-1 propofol and isoflurane) or to a conventional extubation group (n = 60; 50 micrograms.kg-1 fentanyl and 0.1 mg.kg-1 midazolam and isoflurane). Cardiac morbidity (postoperative myocardial ischemia, postoperative myocardial infarction, and perioperative sympathoadrenal stress response), respiratory morbidity (postextubation apnea, alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient, pulmonary shunting, oxygen consumption, atelectasis, and reintubation), hemodynamic values and vasoactive medication requirements, intraoperative awareness, postoperative cognitive function, 30 day mortality, and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were compared between the two groups.
                Fifty-one of the 60 patients in each group (85%) were extubated within the defined time period. Postoperative extubation time and intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay were significantly shorter in the early group. At 48 hours after operation, there were no significant differences between the two groups in myocardial ischemia incidences, ischemia burdens, or creatine kinase isoenzyme MB levels. Four patients in the conventional group, but not in the early group, had postoperative myocardial infaction. The extubation anesthetics used were effective in suppressing the perioperative plasma catecholamine stress response in both groups. Postextubation apnea characteristics were similar between the groups. Intrapulmonary shunt fraction improved significantly in the early group at 4 hours after extubation. The incidences and degree of atelectasis did not differ significantly between the two groups. The incidences of treated postoperative complications were comparable between the two groups, but three patients in the conventional group died as a result of stroke or postoperative myocardial infarction.
                Early extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and does not increase perioperative morbidity. There is an improvement in postextubation intrapulmonary shunt fraction and a reduction in intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay. Remifentanil may be beneficial in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery, by promoting hemodynamic stability, reducing drug requirements, and attenuating the neurohumoral "stress response." We enrolled 77 cardiac surgical patients in a double-blinded, randomized trial and randomly allocated them to one of three groups: remifentanil infusion at 0.83 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) (Group R); fentanyl bolus, small dose, at 12 micro g/kg (Group FLD); and fentanyl bolus, moderate dose, at 24 micro g/kg (Group FMD). We found a significant difference in the median time to tracheal extubation: Group FLD, 6.5 h; Group R, 7.3 h; and Group FMD, 9.7 h (P = 0.025). Group R patients had similar times to those of Groups FLD (P = 0.14) and FMD (P = 0.30). Group FLD patients had a longer length of hospital stay (P = 0.030). Patients in Group R had a significantly infrequent rate of hypertension but a frequent rate of hypotension (P < 0.01). The urinary cortisol excretion was larger in Group FLD patients (P < 0.0005), and urine flow was smaller (P < 0.0005). Remifentanil was associated with a propofol dose reduction (P = 0.0005) and a concomitant higher bispectral index (P = 0.032). Three Group FLD patients, but none in groups FMD and R, had postoperative myocardial infarctions (P = 0.032). Remifentanil has larger drug acquisition costs but does not increase the total hospital costs associated with cardiac surgery.
                Remifentanil did not significantly reduce the duration of tracheal intubation after cardiac surgery. Remifentanil, when compared with fentanyl (total doses of approximately 15 and 28 micro g/kg), blunts the hypertensive responses associated with cardiac surgery but is associated with more hypotension; when compared with fentanyl 15 micro g/kg, remifentanil reduces cortisol excretion. Larger-dose opioids (remifentanil 0.85 micro g. kg(-1). min(-1) or fentanyl 28 micro g/kg) were associated with a decreased rate of myocardial infarction after cardiac surgery. Recent interest in earlier tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery has focused attention on the potential benefits of a propofol-based technique. We randomized 124 patients (34 with poor ventricular function) undergoing CABG surgery to receive either a propofol-based (5 mg.kg-1.h-1 prior to sternotomy, 3 mg.kg-1. h-1 thereafter; n = 58) or enflurane-based (0.2%-1.0%, n = 66) anesthetic. Induction of anesthesia consisted of fentanyl 15 micrograms/kg and midazolam 0.05 mg/kg intravenously in both groups. The enflurane group received an additional bolus of fentanyl 5 micrograms/kg prior to sternotomy and fentanyl 10 micrograms/kg with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg at commencement of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients receiving propofol were extubated earlier (median 9.1 h versus 12.3 h, P = 0.006), although there was no difference in time to intensive care unit (ICU) discharge (both 22 h, P = 0.54). Both groups had similar hemodynamic changes throughout (all P > 0.10), as well as metaraminol (P = 0.49) and inotrope requirements (P > 0.10), intraoperative myocardial ischemia (P = 0.12) and perioperative myocardial infarction (P = 0.50). The results of this trial suggest that a propofol-based anesthetic, when compared to an enflurane-based anesthetic requiring additional dosing of fentanyl and midazolam for CPB, can lead to a significant reduction in time to extubation after CABG surgery, without adverse hemodynamic effects, increased risk of myocardial ischemia or infarction. Sequelae of early versus late extubation of the trachea in patients following coronary-artery bypass grafting were compared prospectively in 38 patients randomly assigned to one of the two groups. The times to extubation were 2 +/- 2 and 18 +/- 3 hours after operation for the two groups. Comparisons were made between groups for the following five variables: time spent in the intensive care unit; drug utilization in the intensive care unit; cardiopulmonary morbidity; hemodynamic performance; patient stress (plasma norepinephrine levels). The anesthetic technique consisted of induction with thiopental, nitrous oxide, and halothane, followed by maintenance with nitrous oxide and halothane. Pancuronium was the only muscle relaxant administered. Patients whose tracheas were extubated early had muscle relaxants reversed prior to the application of extubation criteria. There was no significant difference between the groups in times spent in the intensive care unit, hemodynamic performances, or plasma norepinephrine levels; however, the patients whose tracheas were extubated early received less morphine and diazepam and suffered significantly less cardiopulmonary morbidity. We randomized prospectively 144 patients, undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery, to either early or to routine extubation [mechanical ventilatory support for 4-7 h (Group A), or 8-14 h (Group B)]. Anaesthesia was modified for both groups. The groups were well matched in terms of sex, age, NYHA class, preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction, bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, number of grafts used, and blood units transfused. All patients had normal preoperative respiratory, renal, hepatic and cerebral functions. Mechanical ventilatory support (mean +/- SD) was 6.3 +/- 0.7 h for Group A and 11.6 +/- 1.3 h for Group B. Mean ICU stay was 17 +/- 1.3 h for Group A and 22 +/- 1.2 h for Group B, while the mean hospital stay was 7.3 +/- 0.8 days and 8.4 +/- 0.9, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of all postoperative complications among the two groups. There were no reintubation, readmission to the ICU or death in either group. We concluded that change in anaesthesia practice and early postoperative sedation in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery resulted in earlier tracheal extubation, shorter ICU and hospital length of stay without organ dysfunction or postoperative complications. Early extubation was only possible due to the modification of anaesthesia and ICU sedation regime. The objectives of this study were to determine whether minimal low-flow isoflurane-based anesthesia could be a feasible technique for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery. It is hypothesized that isoflurane-based anesthesia facilitates an agreeable recovery from surgery is mediated through preventing hyperglycemia and metabolic disturbance associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.
                107 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to two groups, i.e., isoflurane-based anesthesia group (n = 54) and fentanyl-based anesthesia group (control group, n = 53). In isoflurane-based anesthesia group, patients received isoflurane from induction up till departure from operating room to intensive care unit (ICU). In the control group, fentanyl (66.4 +/- 3.2 micrograms/kg) and midazolam (320 +/- 20 micrograms/kg) were administered to anesthetize the patients during the operation.
                Patients with isoflurane-based anesthesia required less dopamine (0.6 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.2 +/- 0.4 micrograms/min) and dobutamine (0.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.5 micrograms/min); they could be extubated earlier (7.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 35.1 +/- 2.9 h), and had a shorter stay at ICU (2.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.8 +/- 0.4 days). In addition, occurrence of hyperglycemia (167 +/- 7.7 vs. 243 +/- 9.5 mg/dl) and bicarbonate requirement (128 +/- 7.0 vs. 313 +/- 22.0 mEq) were less in patients with isoflurane-based anesthesia as compared with those in fentanyl group.
                These results demonstrate that isoflurane, not fentanyl, benefits patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. This benefit perhaps is mediated through maintaining hemodynamic stability and metabolic homeostasis and preventing hyperglycemia. Sedation and ventilation overnight after cardiac surgery is common practice. However, early extubation may be feasible with no increase in postoperative complications. This study examines (1) if early extubation is possible in a significant number of patients, (2) if it reduces ICU stay, and (3) if this practice increases postoperative complications.
                Prospective, controlled, randomized clinical trial.
                We randomized 404 consecutive patients to early extubation (7 to 11 h postoperatively) (group A, 201 patients) or conventional extubation (between 8 and 12 AM the following day) (group B, 203 patients). Variables included type and severity of the disease, surgical risk, type of operation, operative incidences, postoperative complications, duration of mechanical ventilation, intubation and ICU stay, bleeding, reoperation, vasoactive drugs, and mortality.
                Groups were comparable. Extubation within the preestablished time was successful in 60.2% of patients in group A and 74.4% in group B. Median ICU stay was 27 h in group A and 44 h in group B (p=0.008). Discharge from ICU within the first 24 h postoperatively was 44.3% in group A and 30.5% in group B (p=0.006). There was no significant difference in complications between groups. Successfully extubated patients in group A had more reintubation and prolonged ventilation than in group B.
                (1) Sixty percent of our patients were extubated within 11 h of operation. (2) As a result, the length of stay in ICU was reduced and the percentage of patients discharged within 24 h was increased. (3) There was no increase in clinically important postoperative complications. The technique of early extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting is increasing in popularity, but its safety and effect on myocardial ischaemia remain to be established. In a randomized, prospective study, patients undergoing routine elective coronary artery bypass grafting were managed with either early or late tracheal extubation. The incidence and severity of electrocardiographic myocardial ischaemia were compared. Data were analysed from 85 patients (43 early extubation; 42 late extubation). Median time to extubation was 110 min in the early extubation patients and 757 min in the late extubation patients. After correction for randomization bias, there were no significant differences between groups in ischaemic burden, maximal ST-segment deviation, incidence of ischaemia and area under the ST deviation-time curve (integral of ST deviation and time). Similarly, there were no differences between groups in postoperative creatine kinase MB-isoenzyme concentrations and duration of stay in the ICU or hospital. Therefore, this study provides evidence for the safety of early extubation after routine coronary artery bypass grafting. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after coronary artery bypass graft surgery is a common complication for which, despite many clinical investigations, no definitive etiology has been found. The current use of both high- and low-dose fentanyl as anesthetic techniques allowed us to investigate the effect of fentanyl on the incidence of POCD.
                Three hundred fifty patients scheduled to undergo elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to receive either high-dose fentanyl (50 microg/kg) or low-dose fentanyl (10 mug/kg) as the basis of the anesthetic. All patients underwent neuropsychological testing before surgery and at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months after surgery.
                One hundred sixty-eight patients in the low-dose group and 158 patients in the high-dose group were included in the final analysis. Neuropsychological testing was performed on 88%, 93%, and 92% of patients at 1 week, 3 months, and 12 months, respectively. There was no difference between group mean scores at any of the three testing times. Analysis of individual patients by the 20% rule did not detect any differences between groups. The one SD rule, which has fewer false-positive results, detected significantly more patients with POCD in the low-dose group than in the high-dose group at 1 week (23.6% vs. 13.7%; P = 0.03) but not at the other testing times. Patients with POCD spent an average of 1.2 days longer in the hospital than those without POCD (P = 0.021).
                High-dose fentanyl is not associated with a difference in the incidence of POCD at 3 or 12 months after surgery. Low-dose fentanyl leads to shorter postoperative ventilation times and may be associated with a greater incidence of POCD 1 week after surgery. Early POCD is associated with an increased duration of stay in the hospital. The purpose of this study was to examine the comparative effects of propofol and fentanyl on cerebral oxygenation during normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
                One hundred eighty patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly divided into two groups: propofol group (n = 90) and fentanyl group (n = 90). After induction of anesthesia, a fiberoptic oximetry oxygen saturation catheter was inserted into the right jugular bulb to monitor jugular venous oxygen hemoglobin saturation continuously. Hemodynamic measurements and arterial and jugular venous blood gases were measured at seven time points. All patients underwent a battery of neurologic and neuropsychological tests on the day before the operation and at 6 months after the operation.
                Cerebral desaturation (defined as a jugular venous oxygen hemoglobin saturation value less than 50%) during cardiopulmonary bypass was more frequent in the fentanyl group than in the propofol group. Cerebral desaturation time (duration when jugular venous oxygen hemoglobin saturation was less than 50%) and the ratio of cerebral desaturation time to total cardiopulmonary bypass time in the fentanyl group differed significantly from those in the propofol group (fentanyl group: 27 +/- 14 minutes, 20% +/- 9%; propofol group: 18 +/- 11 minutes, 14% +/- 7%, respectively, p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative cognitive dysfunction at 6 months after operation between the two groups (propofol group: 5 of 77, 6%; fentanyl group: 5 of 75, 7%).
                Propofol preserved cerebral oxygenation state estimated by jugular venous oxygenation during cardiopulmonary bypass compared with the fentanyl group. However, propofol did not affect postoperative cognitive dysfunction.
The use of low-dose opioid based general anaesthesia and time-directed protocols for fast-track interventions have similar risks of mortality and major postoperative complications to conventional (not fast-track) care, and therefore appear to be safe in patients considered to be at low to moderate risk. These fast-track interventions reduced the time to extubation and shortened the length of stay in the intensive care unit, but did not reduce the length of stay in the hospital.