Initial experience on rifampin and pyrazinamide vs isoniazid in the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection among patients with silicosis in Hong Kong. Adverse events with 4 months of rifampin therapy or 9 months of isoniazid therapy for latent tuberculosis infection: a randomized trial. Treatment completion and costs of a randomized trial of rifampin for 4 months versus isoniazid for 9 months. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial of three antituberculosis chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients with silicosis in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Chest Service/Tuberculosis Research Centre, Madras/British Medical Research Council. Is the combination of pyrazinamide plus rifampicin safe for treating latent tuberculosis infection in persons not infected by the human immunodeficiency virus? [Compliance and tolerance of new antitubercular short-term chemopreventive regimens in childhood--a pilot project]. [Compliance, tolerance and effectiveness of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen for the treatment of tuberculosis]. Latent tuberculosis infection treatment for prison inmates: a randomised controlled trial. Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection. [Treatment of latent tuberculosis among homeless population. Comparison between wo therapeutic approaches].
To compare the adverse effects and treatment adherence between 2 months of rifampin plus pyrazinamide (2RZ) and 6 months of isoniazid (6H).
                Patients with silicosis in Hong Kong are at high risk of acquiring tuberculosis. A previous study showed that treatment with 6H reduced the risk of silico-tuberculosis by one half.
                Patients with silicosis and a Mantoux skin test reaction > or =10 mm were randomized to receive either 2RZ or 6H daily. Liver function testing was done monthly during the initial 2 months. The adverse effects and treatment adherence were compared between the two regimens.
                Forty patients (mean age, 61.6 +/- 9.1 years) and 36 patients (mean age, 57.6 +/- 9.7 years) were randomized to the 2RZ and 6H arms, respectively (p > 0.05) [+/- SD]. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Nineteen patients in the 2RZ arm had peak alanine transaminase (ALT) levels > 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) in comparison with only five study subjects of the 6H arm (47.5% vs 13.9%, p < 0.01). Fourteen patients (35%) in the 2RZ arm and 1 patient (2.8%) in the 6H arm had peak ALT levels more than five times the ULN (p < 0.001). Only seven patients had symptoms suggestive of hepatitis; none of the patients had jaundice. All recovered after withholding treatment. In the 2RZ study arm, none of the baseline characteristics predicted hepatotoxicity. Other adverse effects were generally mild and comparable between both study arms. Treatment was stopped prematurely in 45% and 36.1% of patients in the 2RZ and 6H arms, respectively (p = 0.43). The main reasons were hepatotoxicity for the 2RZ arm and voluntary withdrawal after experiencing other minor adverse effects for the 6H arm.
                A higher incidence of hepatotoxicity was associated with rifampin plus pyrazinamide than isoniazid in the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection among patients with silicosis in Hong Kong. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection with isoniazid for 9 months is complicated by poor patient adherence and the need for close follow-up of side effects, especially hepatotoxicity. Shorter and safer regimens are needed.
                To compare the frequency of adverse events and treatment completion in 2 treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection.
                Multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.
                Tuberculosis clinics located in university hospitals in Canada, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia.
                847 patients without a contraindication for rifampin and requiring treatment for latent tuberculosis infection.
                Four months of daily rifampin therapy or 9 months of daily isoniazid therapy.
                Grade 3 to 4 drug-related adverse events resulting in drug discontinuation (primary outcome), and on-time treatment completion, grade 1 to 2 drug-related adverse events, and changes in liver enzymes and hematologic variables (secondary outcomes).
                Seventeen of 422 participants who started isoniazid therapy developed grade 3 to 4 adverse events compared with 7 of 418 who started rifampin therapy (risk difference [rifampin minus isoniazid], -2.3% [95% CI, -5% to -0.1%]; P = 0.040). Grade 3 or 4 hepatitis occurred in 16 of 422 isoniazid recipients compared with 3 of 418 rifampin recipients (risk difference, -3.1% [CI, -5% to -1%]; P = 0.003). Grade 1 or 2 adverse events attributed to study drugs occurred with similar frequency. Asymptomatic reduction in platelet and leukocyte counts were more frequent in rifampin recipients. More patients completed rifampin treatment (78%) than isoniazid treatment (60%) (difference, 18% [CI, 12% to 24%]; P < 0.001]).
                The study did not measure efficacy, and the open-label design may increase the chance of bias in ascertainment of adverse events.
                Treatment of latent tuberculosis with 4 months of rifampin leads to fewer serious adverse events and better adherence than 9 months of isoniazid. These findings justify a large-scale trial to compare the efficacy of rifampin with that of isoniazid. There is little published information regarding treatment completion, safety, and efficacy of rifampin administered daily for 4 months-a recommended alternative to 9 months of isoniazid for therapy of latent tuberculosis infection. In an open-label randomized trial at a university-affiliated respiratory hospital, consenting patients whose treating physician had recommended therapy for latent tuberculosis infection were randomized to daily self-administered rifampin for 4 months or daily self-administered isoniazid for 9 months. Of 58 patients randomized to rifampin, 53 (91%) took 80% of doses, and 50 (86%) took more than 90% of doses within 20 weeks compared with 44 (76%) and 36 (62%) who took 80 and 90%, respectively, of doses of isoniazid within 43 weeks (relative risks: 80% of doses, 1.2 [95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.4]; 90% of doses, 1.4 [1.1, 1.7]). Adverse events resulted in permanent discontinuation of therapy for two (3%) patients taking rifampin, and for eight (14%) patients taking isoniazid. Three patients developed drug-induced hepatitis--all were taking isoniazid. Total costs of therapy were significantly higher for isoniazid. In conclusion, completion of therapy was significantly better with 4 months of rifampin and major side effects were somewhat lower. Further studies are needed to assess the safety and efficacy of the 4-month rifampin regimen. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of antituberculosis chemoprophylaxis was undertaken in sillicotic subjects in Hong Kong where there is a high prevalence of both silicosis and tuberculosis. During 1981 to 1987, 679 Chinese men with silicosis, with no history of previous antituberculosis chemotherapy and no evidence of active tuberculosis, were admitted to the trial and have been studied for between 2 and 5 yr. They were allocated at random to four series-rifampin for 12 wk (R3), isoniazid and rifampin for 12 wk (HR3), isoniazid alone for 24 wk (H6), or placebo (Pl)--in a double-blind design with matching placebos for isoniazid and rifampin as appropriate. Active pulmonary tuberculosis developed more frequently during the 5 yr in the placebo series than in the three chemoprophylaxis series (p less than 0.01, log-rank test), but there were no significant differences between the chemoprophylaxis series. The estimated proportions of patients with active pulmonary disease in the placebo series were 9% at 2 yr, 15% at 3 yr, 20% at 4 yr, and 27% at 5 yr. In contrast, in the three chemoprophylaxis series combined they were 5, 8, 10, and 13%, respectively. Thus, although chemoprophylaxis halved the proportion of patients in whom tuberculosis developed, this proportion was still substantial. There was no evidence that chemoprophylaxis led to the selection of drug-resistant strains of bacilli. Adverse effects were reported with a similar frequency in all four series, suggesting that few were drug related. During the first 12 wk, hepatic toxicity was reported in 8 (1%) patients (3 HR3, 3 H6, and 2 Pl), but only 1 (H6) had symptomatic hepatitis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Nine public health care centres in four Spanish cities.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 months of rifampicin (R) plus pyrazinamide (Z) therapy (2RZ) compared with a 6-month course of isoniazid therapy (6H) for treating latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI).
                Multicentered, randomised, comparative and prospective trial conducted in HIV-seronegative contacts of infectious pulmonary TB cases.
                Of 352 individuals, 199 received 6H and 153 2RZ; 73% of contacts receiving 6H and 71% receiving 2RZ completed treatment (P = 0.73). Treatment interruption due to hepatotoxicity (ALT/AST > 5 times upper limit of normal) was observed in 10% of contacts in the 2RZ group and in 2.5% of the 6H group (P = 0.007). This higher than expected rate of hepatotoxicity in the 2RZ arm led to premature termination of the study. Severe or fatal liver injury was not detected. Liver function tests normalised after discontinuation of treatment. We conclude that the use of RZ should only be considered when other regimens are unsuitable and intensive monitoring of liver function is feasible. Efficacy of preventive chemotherapy in tuberculosis-infected children depends to a great extend on medical compliance and drug tolerability. Two new short-course chemoprevention-regimes of tuberculosis--four months Rifampin (A) and two months Rifampin plus Pyrazinamide (B)--were compared with the well established regimen of six months Isoniacid (C). 150 children (mean age 3.6 years with Tb conversion) were randomly allocated to these three regimens. 13 patients were non-compliant, in terms of interview, urinary INH-test strips, urine colour and prescription frequency: 7 in group C and 3 in group A and B, respectively. Adverse effects were observed in 5 patients: 3 in group C and 1 in group A and B. 1 child (group B) developed tuberculosis two years after stopping short course chemoprevention. Good compliance (94%) as well as neglectable risks of adverse effects (2%) justify further controlled studies to evaluate the efficacy of short course chemoprevention in childhood. To evaluate compliance, side effects and the efficacy of a short course of chemoprophylaxis for tuberculosis with isoniazid plus rifampin during 3 months, compared with the classic course of isoniazid for 9 months.
                Prospective, comparative, randomized and open study of patients with the suitable criteria for chemoprophylaxis, in accordance with the guidelines of the Centers for Disease Control of 1990. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the group of isoniazid plus rifampin, received isoniazid (300 mg per day) plus rifampin (600 mg per day) for 3 months, and the group of isoniazid, that received isoniazid at a dose of 300 mg per day for 9 months.
                238 patients were included, of which 42 refused chemoprophylaxis. Of the remaining 196 patients, 98 were included in each group. Both groups were comparable at base level. The side effects, neither light nor severe showed significant differences. The appearance of adverse effects obliged the suspension of treatment in 7 patients in group isoniazid and of 9 patients in group isoniazid plus rifampin. Three patients in group isoniazid plus rifampin and 11 in group isoniazid stopped treatment (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.02-19.45; p = 0.04). Efficacy was comparable in the two groups; only one case of tuberculosis was detected in a patient who gave up chemoprophylaxis at day 30.
                Tolerance in group isoniazid plus rifampin compared with group I was similar. Compliance was better in the short-term group with a lower percentage of abandonment. On comparing, both groups have shown similar efficacy in preventing the appearance of tuberculosis. A prison in northern Taiwan.
                To compare safety and the completion rate of the 4-month daily rifampicin regimen (4R) vs. the standard 6-month daily isoniazid regimen (6H) for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) in prison inmates.
                This was an open-label randomised trial among human immunodeficiency virus negative male inmates. Inmates without active tuberculosis (TB) who tested positive for both the tuberculin skin test and QuantiFERON®-TB Gold In-Tube were eligible, but those with baseline glutamic pyruvic transaminase (GPT) levels ≥ 120 U/l, bilirubin levels ≥ 2.4 U/l or a platelet count < 150 k/mm(3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was any adverse event that resulted in discontinuation of LTBI treatment.
                Participants (n = 373; 14% hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 21% anti-hepatitis C virus [HCV] positive) were randomised (stratified by hepatitis B virus, HCV status and 2-year prison term) to receive either 4R or 6H under directly observed treatment. The 4R group (n = 190) was less likely to experience an adverse event leading to discontinuation of treatment (2% vs. 12%, P < 0.001 for all adverse events; 0% vs. 8%, P < 0.001 for hepatotoxicity), and more likely to complete LTBI treatment (86% vs. 78%, P = 0.041), compared with the 6H group (n = 183).
                4R is safer and has a higher completion rate than 6H as treatment for LTBI among male prison inmates. Treatment of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is an essential component of tuberculosis control and elimination. The current standard regimen of isoniazid for 9 months is efficacious but is limited by toxicity and low rates of treatment completion.
                We conducted an open-label, randomized noninferiority trial comparing 3 months of directly observed once-weekly therapy with rifapentine (900 mg) plus isoniazid (900 mg) (combination-therapy group) with 9 months of self-administered daily isoniazid (300 mg) (isoniazid-only group) in subjects at high risk for tuberculosis. Subjects were enrolled from the United States, Canada, Brazil, and Spain and followed for 33 months. The primary end point was confirmed tuberculosis, and the noninferiority margin was 0.75%.
                In the modified intention-to-treat analysis, tuberculosis developed in 7 of 3986 subjects in the combination-therapy group (cumulative rate, 0.19%) and in 15 of 3745 subjects in the isoniazid-only group (cumulative rate, 0.43%), for a difference of 0.24 percentage points. Rates of treatment completion were 82.1% in the combination-therapy group and 69.0% in the isoniazid-only group (P<0.001). Rates of permanent drug discontinuation owing to an adverse event were 4.9% in the combination-therapy group and 3.7% in the isoniazid-only group (P=0.009). Rates of investigator-assessed drug-related hepatotoxicity were 0.4% and 2.7%, respectively (P<0.001).
                The use of rifapentine plus isoniazid for 3 months was as effective as 9 months of isoniazid alone in preventing tuberculosis and had a higher treatment-completion rate. Long-term safety monitoring will be important. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; PREVENT TB ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023452.). We aimed to compare treatment adherence and toxicity of isoniazide (H) (6 months) compared with rifampicine (R) + pirazinamide (Z) (2 months) in homeless patients in latent tuberculous infection (LTBI).
                Randomized and controlled prospective study.
                We included 172 patients (116 males and 56 females) with an age average of 42.3 (12.8) years; 31 (18%) had recent conversion and 72 (41.8%) had some risk factor of hepatotoxicity. Both bivariate and multivariate analysis (p < 0.001; OR = 5.15 [2.34-11.35]) showed that the treatment was completed by 61.5% of patients administered the R+Z regimen, while it was completed only by 28.2% of those administered H for 6 months. Moreover, treatment was completed by 48.4% of Spanish or foreign patients with legal residence, while it was completed only by 28.6% of immigrant patients with no legal residence (p = 0.044 in bivariate analysis).
                The R+Z regimen for 2 months as treatment of LTBI in homeless patients displays a higher adherence than H for 6 months. There were no differences in toxicity.
Trials to date of shortened prophylactic regimens using rifampicin alone have not demonstrated higher rates of active TB when compared to longer regimens with INH. Treatment completion is probably higher and adverse events may be fewer with shorter rifampicin regimens. Shortened regimens of rifampicin with INH may offer no advantage over longer INH regimens. Rifampicin combined with pyrazinamide is associated with more adverse events. A weekly regimen of rifapentine plus INH has higher completion rates, and less liver toxicity, though treatment discontinuation due to adverse events is probably more likely than with INH.