Fluticasone or montelukast for preschool children with asthma-like symptoms: Randomized controlled trial. Safety, tolerability, and exploratory efficacy of montelukast in 6- to 24-month-old patients with asthma.
Beneficial effects of anti-inflammatory therapy such as fluticasone propionate (FP) and montelukast (Mk) have been demonstrated in preschool children with asthma. However, comparative studies are lacking in this age group. Therefore, we conducted a study to evaluate and compare the effect of FP and Mk in preschool children with asthma-like symptoms.
                In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy trial, children aged 2-6 years with asthma-like symptoms were included. In total, 63 children were randomly allocated to receive FP (25), Mk (18) or placebo (20) for 3 months. The primary outcome was the daily symptom score (wheeze, cough, shortness of breath) as recorded by caregivers in a symptom diary card. Secondary endpoints were rescue medication free days, blood eosinophils and lung function (interrupter technique and forced oscillation technique (FOT)).
                During the 3 months study period, symptoms improved in all 3 groups, with a statistically significant difference between FP and placebo in favor of the FP group (p=0.021). A significant reduction in circulating eosinophils after 3 months of treatment was found in the Mk group only (p=0.008), which was significantly different from the change found in the placebo group (p=0.045). With the exception of frequency dependence (measured by FOT), which showed a difference between FP and Mk after 3 months of treatment in favor of the FP group (p=0.048), no differences in lung function within or between groups were found.
                In spite of a lack of power, our results suggest that FP has a beneficial effect on symptoms and Mk on blood eosinophil level as compared to placebo. Except for a difference in one lung function parameter after 3 months between FP and Mk in favor of the FP group, this study revealed no differences between FP and Mk. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and tolerability profile of montelukast 4-mg oral granules compared with placebo in children aged 6-24 months with asthma.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Children 6-24 months of age at first visit with a history of at least three episodes of physician-diagnosed asthma or 'asthma-like' symptoms and in need of controller therapy were randomized to either montelukast 4-mg oral granules or placebo once daily in the evening for 6 weeks. The primary variables were the frequency of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences. The exploratory efficacy endpoints included days without beta-agonist use, beta-agonist use per day, unscheduled physician or hospital visits for asthma, oral corticosteroid rescues for asthma, asthma attacks, discontinuation due to worsening of asthma, and total blood peripheral eosinophil counts.
                The most common clinical adverse experiences were upper respiratory tract infection, asthma, fever, diarrhea, and vomiting occurring with similar frequencies between treatment groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences between the two treatment groups in clinical or laboratory adverse experiences and no significant differences in frequency of patients with elevated serum transaminases. Differences between the montelukast and placebo treatment groups in the exploratory efficacy endpoints of days without beta-agonist use, oral corticosteroid rescues, emergency care, asthma attacks, and discontinuations due to worsening asthma were not significant.
                Montelukast, 4-mg oral granules, was well tolerated over 6 weeks of treatment in children aged 6-24 months with asthma.
With the lack of evidence, the routine use of LRTA in treating children with non-specific cough cannot be recommended.