Comparison of lung deposition of colomycin using the HaloLite and the Pari LC Plus nebulisers in patients with cystic fibrosis. Effect of smaller droplet size of dornase alfa on lung function in mild cystic fibrosis. Dornase Alfa Nebulizer Group. Pharmacokinetics and safety of tobramycin administered by the PARI eFlow rapid nebulizer in cystic fibrosis. Lung deposition of inhaled tobramycin with eFlow rapid/LC Plus jet nebuliser in healthy and cystic fibrosis subjects. Aerosol deposition in cystic fibrosis using an aerosol conservation device and a conventional jet nebulizer. An evaluation of two aerosol delivery systems for rhDNase. Nebulisers comparison with inhaled tobramycin in young children with cystic fibrosis. A comparison of peak sputum tobramycin concentration in patients with cystic fibrosis using jet and ultrasonic nebulizer systems. Aerosolized Tobramycin Study Group. Aerosolization of tobramycin (TOBI) with the PARI LC PLUS reusable nebulizer: which compressor to use? Comparison of the CR60 to the PortaNeb compressor. Lung deposition in cystic fibrosis patients using an ultrasonic or a jet nebulizer. Comparison of drug delivery from conventional versus "Venturi" nebulizers. Pulmonary deposition of nebulised amiloride in cystic fibrosis: comparison of two nebulisers. Efficiency of pulmonary administration of tobramycin solution for inhalation in cystic fibrosis using an improved drug delivery system. A widely available method for the assessment of aerosol delivery in cystic fibrosis. Comparison of three jet nebulizer aerosol delivery systems used to administer recombinant human DNase I to patients with cystic fibrosis. The Pulmozyme rhDNase Study Group. Deposition of carbenicillin aerosols in cystic fibrosis: effects of nebuliser system and breathing pattern.
To examine the effectiveness of delivery of nebulised colistin by the HaloLite nebuliser compared to the Pari LC Plus in patients with cystic fibrosis.
                Randomised crossover trial of 15 patients aged >6 years. Inhalation of one mega unit of colistin in 3 ml diluent, labelled with technetium-99m DTPA, was used to assess lung deposition. The Pari was nebulised to dryness and one button press of the HaloLite was completed. Following a seven day washout period, patients inhaled colistin twice daily for seven days through the first device. Sputum specimens were analysed for colistin levels and pseudomonas load. This procedure was repeated with the alternative device.
                Lung uptake of radiolabelled colistin was significantly higher with the Pari. However, lung uptake calculated as a percentage of the amount of drug used was significantly higher for the HaloLite. Time to nebulise was significantly shorter with the HaloLite. Sputum levels of colistin were higher following use of the Pari; this was close to significance.
                The manufacturer's recommended dosages for nebulising antibiotics with a HaloLite result in a lower delivery than patients receive when using a Pari nebuliser. The concept of adaptive aerosol delivery has several theoretical advantages but the recommended doses for the HaloLite need to be modified in order to improve effectiveness. Aerosolized recombinant human DNase (dornase alfa) reduces mucus viscoelasticity in vitro and improves pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We postulated that if dornase alfa could be delivered more peripherally to small airways in the lung in the form of smaller aerosol droplets in patients with early airway obstruction, the increase in pulmonary function from baseline might be improved. CF patients (n = 749) with mild lung disease (baseline forced vital capacity > or = 70% predicted) were randomly assigned to receive dornase alfa 2.5 mg daily for 2 weeks by one of two nebulizer systems: 1) the Medic-Aid Durable SideStream nebulizer powered by the MobilAire Compressor (SS/MA) producing a droplet size with a mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 2.1 microm; or 2) the Hudson T Up-draft nebulizer with a DeVilbiss Pulmo-Aide compressor (HT/PA) with an MMAD of 4.9 microm. Spirometry was performed at baseline and following 14 days of treatment. Dornase alfa delivered by both nebulizer systems produced small but statistically significant improvements in pulmonary function compared with baseline. There was a trend (P = 0.06) toward greater improvement in forced expiratory flow in 1 s in the SS/MA group (4.3%) compared with the HT/PA group (2.5%). These results indicate that the short-term spirometric response to dornase alfa is influenced in part by the physical characteristics of the aerosol in patients with mild lung disease. We speculate that this may be true for other therapeutic aerosols, and it appears that localization of disease in the lung plays a role in the response to inhaled agents. Nebulization times have been identified as an issue in patient compliance with tobramycin solution for inhalation (TSI) therapy in cystic fibrosis (CF).
                In this randomized, open-label, multicentre, two-period, crossover study, patients (n=25) with CF and chronic pulmonary pseudomonal infection received TSI for 15 days via eFlow rapid or LC PLUS nebulizer. Nebulization times and sputum/serum tobramycin concentrations were determined, and safety evaluated.
                Nebulization times were significantly shorter for eFlow rapid versus LC PLUS on Day 1 (least squares mean estimate of the difference -10.5 min, 95% confidence intervals [CI] -12.6, -8.3, p<0.0001) and Day 15 (difference -7.7 min, 95% CI -9.0, -6.5, p<0.0001). Broadly comparable sputum/systemic exposure to tobramycin was observed and the incidence of adverse events was similar for both nebulizers.
                Use of the eFlow rapid nebulizer reduced TSI nebulization time. The systemic exposure to tobramycin appeared to be broadly similar in this exploratory study. Reducing nebulisation times for tobramycin solution for inhalation in cystic fibrosis (CF) may improve compliance.
                In this single-dose, open-label, two-way crossover study, 13 subjects (7 CF, 6 healthy) were randomised to receive tobramycin via eFlow rapid or LC Plus jet nebuliser. Drug deposition in the lung using gamma scintigraphic imaging, nebulisation times, pharmacokinetics, and safety were evaluated.
                In CF patients, whole-lung deposition was 40% less with the eFlow rapid compared with LC Plus nebulisers was (8.9±0.8%, and 15.1±6.0%, p>0.05). Nebulisation time was shorter with eFlow rapid compared to LC Plus (7.0min versus 20.0min, p<0.05). Lung deposition in healthy subjects was comparable between both devices.
                eFlow rapid reduces the nebulisation time of tobramycin and can potentially improved compliance in patients with CF.
                Copyright Â© 2010 European Cystic Fibrosis Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. The deposition of technetium radiolabelled aerosol within the lungs of 12 stable cystic fibrosis patients (mean age 12.7 years) was compared using the Acorn nebulizer and mouthpiece alone, and the Acorn nebulizer attached to the Mizer Aerosol Conservation Device (MACD). The total activity delivered to the patient using the MACD was 11.1% (+/- 7.8% s.d.) of the initial dose, compared to 5.8% (+/- 4.2% s.d.) with the nebulizer and mouthpiece alone (P < 0.05). With the MACD, 84% of the intrapulmonary dose was delivered to the peripheral regions, compared to 76.5% with the nebulizer and mouthpiece (P < 0.05). No significant correlation was found between aerosol deposition and pulmonary function. The Mizer Aerosol Conservation Device significantly increases both total intrapulmonary aerosol deposition and peripheral aerosol distribution. Increasingly, proteins are delivered to the respiratory tract as an aerosol, and clinical efficacy is dependent on optimal delivery of the protein in an intact form. The object of this study was to compare the in vivo and in vitro results of two aerosol delivery systems for the aerosolization of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I (rhDNase) in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Patients with CF who were to be initiated on rhDNase were randomized either to the Hudson nebulizer and Pulmo-Aide compressor or to the Sidestream nebulizer driven by the CR50 air compressor. An in vitro study was performed in six sets of the two aerosol delivery systems. One hundred and seventy three patients were randomized in this open study, where rhDNase was administered for 7 days. Improvements in pulmonary function were observed in both groups following 1 week of therapy with rhDNase. Changes in the Sidestream/CR50 and Hudson/Pulmo-Aide groups, respectively, were: 16 and 11% for forced expiratory volume in one second (p=0.14); 12 and 10% for forced vital capacity (p=0.70); and 14 and 7% for forced expiratory flow at 25-75% of expiration (FEF(25-75)) (p=0.18). A greater proportion of patients in the Sidestream/CR50 group (58%) had a >10% response in FEF(25-75) compared to the Hudson/Pulmo-Aide group (42%; p=0.03). The Sidestream nebulizer had a faster nebulization rate (p<0.05), lower mass median diameter for the aerosol mass produced (p<0.001), higher percentage of particles in the respirable range (p<0.001) and greater respirable output (p<0.005), compared to the Hudson nebulizer. The Sidestream/CR50 combination is a quicker, more efficient system in vitro than the Hudson/Pulmo-Aide combination, whereas the in vivo study only suggested a difference. Clinically, the two systems have similar efficacy. This randomised cross-over pilot study was undertaken in 10 cystic fibrosis children aged 10 to 63 months to describe lung absorption of tobramycin delivered by the PariLC+/PariTurboboyN (Pari GmbH) and the disposable NL9M/AtomisorBoxPlus (Diffusion Technique Française) nebulising systems.
                Each child inhaled 300 mg tobramycin delivered with one or the other apparatus via a facemask in two separate and standardised sessions. Urine was collected for 6 h. Tobramycin concentrations determined by immunoprecipitation were expressed in mg per g of creatinine and compared by a Wilcoxon test for matched pairs. The influences of age, weight and Brasfield score on this parameter were evaluated by correlation tests, and those of sex, previous nebulisation treatment, and crying or coughing were evaluated by Student's t-test.
                The amount of tobramycin measured in urines was low and variable. Median values for urinary tobramycin concentration were 47.6 mg/g (14.9-79.6) with the PariLC+ and 42.6 mg/g (6.3-112.8) with the NL9M (p=0.6). PariLC+ delivered tobramycin in 22 min and NL9M in 12 min (p=0.005). Crying or coughing dramatically reduced the amount of tobramycin collected.
                This pilot study shows that evaluation of nebulisers based on tobramycin renal excretion is feasible in young children with cystic fibrosis. To determine whether adequate concentrations of a new formulation of tobramycin could be delivered to the lower respiratory tract of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) using a jet nebulizer delivery system.
                A multicenter, open-label, randomized, crossover study.
                Ten tertiary care, university-affiliated, teaching hospitals in the United States.
                Sixty-eight patients recruited from 10 CF Foundation centers and who were at least 8 years of age, had a diagnosis of CF, and expectorated daily sputum. No control subjects enrolled.
                Each patient received one administration of aerosolized tobramycin from each of the three nebulizer systems in random order. Each administration was separated by a minimum of 48 h. The two jet nebulizer systems tested were the Sidestream (Medic-Aid; Sussex, UK), and the Pari LC (Pari Respiratory Equipment; Richmond, Va), with a DeVilbiss Pulmoaide compressor (DeVilbiss Health Care; Somerset, Pa), both administering 300 mg tobramycin in 5 mL of 1/4 normal saline solution (NS). Patients were also administered 600 mg tobramycin in 30 mL of 1/2 NS with the UltraNeb 99/100 (DeVilbiss).
                Sputum and serum tobramycin concentration and pulmonary function were monitored. An adequate peak sputum tobramycin concentration was defined as > 128 microg/g sputum at any of three time points (10, 60, or 120 min) after completion of treatments.
                The peak tobramycin concentrations in expectorated sputum were 687+/-663 microg/g (mean+/-SD) with the Pari LC and 489+/-402 microg/g with the Sidestream. Adequate peak sputum tobramycin concentration was achieved in 93% of the patients with the Sidestream, and in 87% of the patients with the Pari LC. Peak sputum concentrations were found to be substantially higher when patients received tobramycin administered with the UltraNeb 99/100, 1,498+/-1,331 microg/g with 30% of patients having levels exceeding 2,000 microg/g. Serum tobramycin concentrations were < or = 4 microg/mL for all patients following administration with each nebulizer.
                Adequately high sputum tobramycin concentrations were documented in sputum in > 85% of patients following the administration of 300 mg/5 mL formulation of tobramycin aerosolized by the two jet nebulizer delivery systems, Sidestream and Pari LC. The single tobramycin administration delivered by these two systems is well-tolerated. Aerosol output, aerosol output rate, and aerosol size distribution are influenced by the compressed air flow rate through the nebulizer cup. Testing a nebulizer-compressor with a drug for inhalation in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients is mandatory prior to starting therapy. Tobramycin solution for inhalation (TSI), TOBI, is licensed in Europe with a recommendation for a "suitable" compressor connected to the PARI LC Plus nebulizer. To select a compressor, five devices were tested in a previous in vitro study and this resulted in a subsequent in vivo study. Two compressors [CR60 and PortaNeb (PN)] were compared in an open, randomized, crossover single dose pilot study in 10 CF patients to assess the most suitable device for inhalation of a tobramycin solution (TSI), TOBI, with the PARI LC Plus nebulizer. Lung function (FEV1 and FVC), pharmacokinetics [PK; safety (Cmax, Ctrough)], lung deposition (indirect method AUC0-6), nebulization time, and patients' experiences (questionnaire) were determined and compared. It was found that values of Cmax and AUC0-6 were higher with the CR60 than with the PortaNeb: 0.70 versus 0.54 mg/L, p = 0.005, and 2.54 versus 2.01 h.mg/L, p = 0.017, respectively. Tmax after use of the CR60 appeared earlier (0.64 vs. 0.85 h, p = 0.005). Transient airway narrowing was measured in three patients (2 x PN;1 x CR60) versus subjective chest tightness in seven patients (CR60 > PN). A shorter nebulization time for CR60 of 13.2 min compared to PN 16.1 min (p = 0.022) was observed, which was the main reason why patients preferred the CR60 (n = 7). No toxic serum levels were reached after inhalation of TSI. The CR60 compressor may seem advantageous based on a higher lung deposition and a shorter nebulization time, but a study in a large CF population to provide information on a possible higher risk of toxicity of TSI is called for. This study was conducted to compare pulmonary deposition following inhalation with an ultrasonic and a jet nebulizer in CF patients under conditions relevant to practice. The marker substance used to estimate the relative lung bioavailability was sodium cromoglycate (SCG), which is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract, but is completely absorbed from the lungs. Ten CF patients (aged 9-21 years) used an ultrasonic nebulizer (Multisonic compact 2.4 MHz) and a jet nebulizer (Parimaster, LC Plus Turbo) in a crossover design to inhale a solution containing 20 mg of SCG and a beta(2)-agonist. Urine was collected in five fractions until 12 h p. a., and the excreted SCG was determined by means of HPLC. Prior to each inhalation, the patients' pulmonary function was measured employing a Pneumoscope. Using the ultrasonic nebulizer, the amount of SCG excreted in urine was significantly greater than that after inhalation with the jet nebulizer (1.43 +/- 0.47 mg vs. 1.04 +/- 0.47 mg; p = 0.002), despite the larger residual volume in the ultrasonic nebulizer. The absorption half-life for SCG following ultrasonic nebulization was significantly shorter when compared with jet nebulization (84 +/- 14 min vs. 101 +/- 19 min; p = 0.005), being suggestive of a more peripheral deposition. Furthermore, an inverse relationship was found between absorption half-life and FEV(1) (% pred.) (r = -0.655, p = 0.04) or MMEF(75/25) (% pred.) (r = -0.844, p = 0.031), but only with the ultrasonic nebulizer. In conclusion, the ultrasonic nebulizer tested when used for inhalation in CF patients was found to be at least equivalent to the jet nebulizer. Attempts to improve drug delivery from conventional jet nebulizers have included the use of storage systems to reduce drug wastage during exhalation. Venturi nebulizers enhance drug delivery during inhalation, reducing treatment times and drug wastage. This study investigated the effect of age on inhaled dose from a conventional jet nebulizer (Acorn) used both with and without a storage chamber (Mizer), compared to two Venturi nebulizers (Ventstream and Pari LC). Filters were attached to the four nebulizer systems, containing salbutamol, and 18 children with cystic fibrosis (3-16 yrs) inhaled through these devices. The quantity of drug collected on the filter was assessed using ultraviolet spectrophotometry. The particle size distribution of the aerosol from each nebulizer system was measured using laser diffraction. Inspiratory filter deposition using the Acorn was lower than the Acorn with Mizer, and both Venturi nebulizers. Filter deposition using the Acorn with Mizer was lower than the Pari LC. No trend with age, height or weight was noted using any nebulizer. Aerosol particle size using the Ventstream was lower than the other nebulizer systems. Drug output from both Venturi nebulizers was more efficient than from the jet nebulizer, used with and without the storage chamber, during inhalation by children with cystic fibrosis. The inhaled dose did not change with the patient's age or size using both types of nebulizer. BACKGROUND Preliminary evidence suggests that regular inhalation of nebulised amiloride reduces sputum viscoelasticity, increases the clearance of sputum by mucociliary mechanisms and by coughing and reduces the rate of deterioration in lung function in patients with cystic fibrosis. These effects depend on adequate delivery of amiloride to the airways. This study was performed to quantify and compare pulmonary deposition of amiloride produced by two different nebuliser systems. METHODS The pulmonary deposition of nebulised amiloride (1 mg in 3 ml saline) was measured in eight patients with cystic fibrosis when given via a jet (System 22 with CR 60 compressor) and an ultrasonic (Fisoneb) nebuliser. Human serum albumin labelled with technectium-99m was used as an indirect marker for amiloride and its deposition in the lung was detected with a gamma camera. RESULTS Amiloride inhalation caused no side effects or changes in spirometric indices. The mean (SD) total pulmonary amiloride deposition was 57 (24) micrograms with the System 22 and 103 (53) micrograms with the Fisoneb nebuliser. Pulmonary deposition was completed more rapidly with the Fisoneb (4-5 minutes) than with the System 22 nebuliser (7-8 minutes) and the Fisoneb was preferred by the patients. CONCLUSIONS Both nebulisers appeared to deliver adequate amounts of amiloride to the lungs, but treatment with the Fisoneb nebuliser was quicker, more efficient, and more acceptable to the patients. Of the two nebulisers assessed, the Fisoneb would be preferred for clinical trials. To determine whether tobramycin solution for inhalation (TSI) can be administered safely and more efficiently with a new-generation aerosol device, the AeroDose 5.5 RP inhaler (Aerogen; Mountain View, CA) than with the approved PARI LC PLUS nebulizer (PARI Respiratory Equipment; Monterey, CA) with Pulmo-Aide compressor (DeVilbiss Corp; Somerset, PA). Second, we wanted to ascertain which AeroDose-delivered tobramycin dose is equivalent to the standard 300-mg dose administered with the PARI LC PLUS.
                Open-label, randomized, multicenter, single-dose, three-period, four-treatment, active- control, crossover trial.
                Nine US cystic fibrosis (CF) centers.
                Fifty-three patients >or= 12 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of CF, the ability to expectorate sputum, and FEV(1) of >or= 40% of predicted.
                Subjects inhaled three single doses of TSI at 1-week intervals, as follows: conventional control treatment, 300 mg via the PARI LC PLUS; and two of three experimental treatments, 30, 60, or 90 mg via the AeroDose. FEV(1) was measured before and after dosing. After each dose, sputum and serum samples were collected at various intervals for 8 h, and urine was collected for 24 h to estimate lung and systemic tobramycin delivery.
                There were no significant differences between treatments in the change in FEV(1) 30 min after dosing or in the frequency of adverse events. Sputum and serum levels of tobramycin produced by the AeroDose 90-mg dose treatment approximated those achieved with the PARI LC PLUS 300-mg dose treatment. Nebulization times using the AeroDose inhaler were < 50% those of the PARI LC PLUS.
                Compared with the standard nebulizer, the AeroDose safely achieved an approximately threefold greater efficiency in the delivery of TSI to the lungs in less than half the time. Whilst nebulisers are commonly used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF), nebulised aerosol lung deposition in individual patients is not routinely assessed in clinical practice. The present study was designed to evaluate whether a comparative measurement of aerosol lung deposition from nebulisers using a widely available scintigraphic method could be employed to assist the selection of the best system for individual patients. Lung deposition of the radiolabelled aerosol from the Pari LC Plus (Pari Medical Ltd) nebuliser and the HaloLite Adaptive Aerosol Delivery (AAD) system (Profile Therapeutics Ltd) was measured using planar scintigraphy in 10 healthy volunteers and 6 CF patients. The HaloLite AAD delivered on average 2.1 times (P=0.003) as much aerosol to the lungs compared with Pari LC Plus. Only two subjects had higher lung deposition from Pari LC Plus than HaloLite AAD system. There was marked inter-individual variation in the deposition pattern in CF patients. The aerosol deposition from HaloLite AAD had higher central distribution than that obtained with the Pari LC Plus. The overall intersubject variability of the delivered dose was 56% with Pari LC Plus and 24% with HaloLite AAD (P<0.05). The measurement of aerosol deposition from nebulisers can be performed using a simple and widely available methodology, and may improve nebuliser selection in CF patients. To compare the degree of improvement in pulmonary function achieved with recombinant human DNase I (rhDNase) administered by three different aerosol delivery systems: DeVilbiss Pulmo-Aide compressor with the Marquest Acorn II nebulizer, the Hudson T Up-draft nebulizer, and the Pari LC Jet Plus nebulizer with the Pari Inhalier Boy compressor. These produce similar aerosols in vitro in terms of size distribution and activity of delivered rhDNase.
                Multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of changes from baseline in pulmonary function variables in each test group. Patients were treated with rhDNase (2.5 mg bid) for 15 days, administered with three different aerosol delivery systems.
                Outpatient clinics at 26 sites in the United States.
                397 patients > 5 years of age with cystic fibrosis and baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) values between 40 and 70% of predicted values.
                All three nebulizers gave comparable improvements in pulmonary function. FEV1 increased by an average of 13.2 to 14.1%, FVC by 10.9 to 11.8% and forced midexpiratory flow (FEF25-75) by 16.5 to 17.1%. No unusual or unexpected adverse events were reported other than those that would be expected in patients with cystic fibrosis.
                Recombinant human DNase I produced a similar magnitude of improvement in the pulmonary function of patients with cystic fibrosis when the drug was administered using three different types of nebulizer systems with similar in vitro delivery and safety characteristics. Antibiotic aerosol treatment is successful in treating Pseudomonas infection in some patients with cystic fibrosis, but the amount of drug reaching the lungs is unknown. The deposition patterns of carbenicillin aerosols delivered from two commercially available nebuliser systems (the Turret nebuliser plus Maxi compressor and the Inspiron nebuliser plus Traveller compressor) have been compared in six patients with cystic fibrosis during tidal breathing. The aerosol mass median diameters were 3.2 and 7.3 microns. In addition, the aerosol from the Turret-Maxi nebuliser system was inhaled by a combination of tidal and deep breathing. After two minutes' breathing via a mouthpiece the mean (SEM) deposition in the lungs was 15.60 (1.5) mg carbenicillin with the Turret nebuliser plus Maxi compressor, but only 6.54 (1.09) mg with the Inspiron nebuliser plus Traveller compressor; the distribution pattern within the lung was significantly more peripheral with the former nebuliser system. These differences may be ascribed partly to the smaller droplet size from the Turret system and partly to the higher nebulisation rate from the more powerful Maxi compressor. Tidal plus deep breathing produced a further small but non-significant increase in lung aerosol deposition. A seventh patient, who failed to complete the trial, had little aerosol deposited in his lungs because he inhaled through his nose. These results emphasise the importance of correct selection of nebuliser equipment for antibiotic aerosol treatment.
Clinicians should be aware of the variability in the performance of different nebuliser systems. Technologies such as adaptive aerosol delivery and vibrating mesh technology have advantages over conventional systems in terms of treatment time, deposition as a percentage of priming dose, patient preference and adherence. There is a need for long-term randomised controlled trials of these technologies to determine patient-focused outcomes (such as quality of life and burden of care), safe and effective dosing levels of medications and clinical outcomes (such as hospitalisations and need for antibiotics) and an economic evaluation of their use.