Visual internal urethrotomy. A prospective controlled trial comparing the results after 3 versus 28 days of postoperative catheterisation. The infusion trial of micturition. Are in-dwelling catheters necessary for 24 hours after hysterectomy? Systematic removal of catheter 48 hours following transurethral resection and 24 hours following transurethral incision of prostate: a prospective randomized analysis of 213 patients. Midnight removal: an improved approach to removal of catheters. Removal of catheter at midnight versus early morning: the patients' perspective. Is an indwelling catheter necessary for bladder drainage after modified Burch colposuspension? Optimal duration of urinary drainage after rectal resection: a randomized controlled trial. Does evening removal of urinary catheters shorten hospital stay among general hospital patients? A randomized controlled trial. How long should urinary bladder catheterisation be continued after vaginal prolapse surgery? A randomised controlled trial comparing short term versus long term catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery. Early removal advances discharge home. Comparison of midnight and early morning catheter removal following prostatectomy. A comparison of midnight versus early morning removal of urinary catheters after transurethral resection of the prostate. [Handling of Foley catheter regarding urinary retention syndrome following vaginal surgery]. Trial without catheter following acute retention of urine. Catheter management programs and postoperative urinary dysfunction. Reducing post-catheterization bladder dysfunction by reconditioning. Randomised study of the effect of midnight versus 0600 removal of urinary catheters. Early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy--impact on length of hospital stay. Comparison of 1 and 3 days' transurethral Foley catheterization after retropubic incontinence surgery. Management of postoperative urinary retention: a randomized trial of in-out versus overnight catheterization. A randomized trial comparing bladder infusion with standard catheter removal after transurethral resection of the prostate. Removal of urinary catheters: midnight vs 0600 hours.
In a randomized trial, treatment of urethral stricture by direct visual internal urethrotomy with 3 days of postoperative catheterisation was found to be sufficient, given minimal complications, and had a cure rate of 85% after 6 months and 80% after 1 year follow-up. The postoperative follow-up should not include urethrography, but patient's statement and maximal urinary flow rate might be adequate. To compare three methods for a trial of micturition (TOM) (the midnight removal of the catheter, dawn removal, and a new infusion method) in a randomized prospective study.
                A total of 118 consecutive patients who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or bladder neck incision (BNI) underwent TOM by one of the three methods. In the infusion method, the bladder was filled at a fast-drip rate via the catheter from a bag of normal saline connected by an intravenous supply set. The catheter was then removed, the patient voided and the volume was measured. From the volume of saline remaining, it was possible to calculate the residual volume in the patient.
                The infusion TOM took a mean 13 h less than the other two methods, which were statistically indistinguishable.
                The infusion TOM is safe and simple, is quick to carry out and can be performed at any time. It establishes the completeness of bladder emptying, which helps in the assessment of voiding. In-dwelling catheters for 24 hours after operation are used routinely in gynecologic surgery. This study assesses whether the immediate removal of an in-dwelling catheter after the operation affects the rate of recatheterization, febrile morbidity, symptomatic urinary tract infections, or subjective pain assessments.
                This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial comprised of 250 women who underwent hysterectomy and who did not require bladder suspension or strict fluid treatment. The in-dwelling catheter was removed either immediately after the operation or on the first day after the operation. The association between clinical variables and the length of catheterization were assessed by chi-squared analysis.
                Patients were assigned randomly into 2 groups, with no significant differences in the outcomes, only in the perception of pain. Clinical events included fever (>/=38.5 degrees C) that occurred in 6 patients in the in-dwelling catheter group compared with 5 patients in the early removal group (P=.01), symptomatic urinary tract infections in 3 patients in both groups (P=.99), and recatheterization in 3 patients in the in-dwelling catheter group compared with 5 patients in the early removal group (P=.17). Subjectively, patients in the early removal group reported significantly less pain than did the in-dwelling group (P<.001).
                The early removal of in-dwelling catheters after operation was not associated with an increased rate of febrile events, urinary tract infections, or need for recatheterization. In addition, subjective pain assessment was significantly less in the early removal group. Early removal of an in-dwelling catheter immediately after operation is not associated with adverse events. The interval before removal of the catheter used in prostatic transurethral surgery depends to a great extent on the surgeon, with a frequently empirical orientation. We conducted a prospective, randomized and controlled study of 213 patients who underwent transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The catheter was removed systematically 24 hours after transurethral incision and 48 hours after transurethral resection of the prostate (group 1-52 and 54 patients, respectively) or the catheterization interval was determined by each surgeon in accordance with the usual criteria (group 2-52 and 55 patients, respectively). No statistically significant differences were noted between these 2 groups in regard to complications. We conclude that systematic removal of the catheter at the aforementioned periods is cost-effective, safe and comfortable for the patient. There is no recognised policy regarding the timing of urethral catheter removal, although early morning removal is commonly practised. Removing the catheter at midnight allows patients to return to a normal voiding pattern more rapidly and to leave hospital earlier. With an increasing role of the patient as a partner in making a combined decision in care plan goals, it is important to identify the patient's perspective of the experience of removal of catheter (ROC).
                A non-consecutive prospective randomized study was performed in 84 patients who underwent a transurethral resection of the prostate to determine the impact of midnight versus early-morning ROC on sleep deprivation, over all discomfort to the patient.
                There was no difference in the patient experience in both groups. We found a reduced frequency during the first 6 h of ROC at midnight. However, there was an increased incidence of sleep disturbances in this group. This may in part be due to an anxiety of urge incontinence and may be allayed by appropriate counselling. There was no delay in discharge of the patients in both groups.
                The patients must, therefore, be given the choice of ROC either at midnight or early morning, as the advantages of a reduced frequency must be correlated with an increased incidence of sleep disturbances.
                2005 S. Karger AG, Basel Catheterization is considered to be a mandatory procedure for adequate bladder drainage following an anti-incontinence operation until the recovery of normal voiding function occurs. We conducted this prospective study to challenge this practice. A total of 86 patients with genuine stress incontinence who underwent a modified Burch coplosuspension were randomized into two groups based on the day of operation. The study group consisted of 42 patients who had the transurethral Foley catheter removed postoperatively the next morning (Group A). The control group was composed of 43 patients who had the transurethral indwelling catheter left in place until the fifth postoperative day (Group B). The percentages of immediate voiding difficulties in Groups A and B were 7.1% and 0%, respectively ( P>0.05). The postoperative urinary tract infection rates of Groups A and B were 16.6% and 23.3%, respectively ( P>0.05). The success rates of our patients were not compromised after our modified operative procedures (78.6% with dry results and 19.0% with improved symptoms in Group A vs. 74.4% with dry results and 20.9% with improved symptoms in Group B, P >0.05). Our results imply that it is not necessary that an indwelling catheter, for bladder drainage, be left in place until the fifth postoperative day to prevent immediate voiding difficulties. Voiding dysfunction is frequently observed after rectal resection and justifies urinary drainage. However, there is no agreement about the optimal duration of this postoperative drainage. The aim of this controlled trial was to compare 1 versus 5 days of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection, with special reference to urinary tract infection and bladder retention.
                One hundred twenty-six patients undergoing rectal resection were included in a prospective randomized study designed to compare the results for patients undergoing 1 day of transurethral catheterization after rectal resection (1-day group) with those for patients undergoing 5 days' catheterization (5-day group).
                Patients were randomly assigned to the 1-day and 5-day groups (n = 64 and 62, respectively). Clinical findings and surgical procedures were comparable in both groups. Acute urinary retention occurred in 16 patients (25%) in the 1-day group versus 6 (10%) in the 5-day group (P < .05). Urinary tract infection was observed in 13 of 64 patients (20%) in the 1-day group versus 26 of 62 (42%) in the 5-day group (P < .01). Multivariate analysis revealed that after 1 day of catheterization carcinoma of the low rectum and lymph node metastasis were significant risk factors for acute urinary retention (P < .05 for both factors). After selection of patients without low rectum carcinoma, the acute urinary retention rate was comparable in both groups (14% in the 1-day group versus 7% in the 5-day group), but the urinary tract infection rate was significantly lower in the 1-day group versus the 5-day group (14% vs 40, P < .01).
                Our controlled study showed that after rectal resection 1 day of urinary drainage can be recommended for most patients. Five-day drainage should be reserved for patients with low rectal carcinoma. Literature indicates that removing urinary catheters at midnight facilitates earlier discharge among urology patients, but the effect of evening removal on the general patient population is unknown. The objective of this study was to investigate whether removing a urinary catheter at 22.00 hours compared to 06.00 hours among a general hospital population would lead to earlier hospital discharge.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                The study was conducted in a large tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Two hundred and ten general surgical and medical patients who had an indwelling catheter as part of their routine care were included.
                Length of hospital stay after catheter removal was not significantly affected by the timing of its removal among general hospital patients: mean hours morning 186.1; mean evening 209.3, (P = .309). In a cohort of surgical patients, the hospital stay was shorter in the evening removal group (mean hours morning 186.1; mean evening 209.3), but this result was not statistically significant (P = .127). Patients in the evening group were more likely to have a longer time period between catheter removal and the first postcatheter void, mean hours morning, 3.76 vs evening, 4.89 (t = -2.59, CI - 1.99 to -0.27). Timing of removal of the urinary catheter had no effect on the volume of the first void, mean volume morning, 214.7 mL vs evening, 221.4 mL. Twenty-five (12.1%) patients were recatheterized, but the rate of recatheterization between groups was similar. There were no differences in postdischarge problems between groups.
                Among general hospital patients, removing an indwelling urinary catheter at 22:00 hours does not shorten the length of stay and is effective in increasing the time to first void. To determine whether prolonged urinary bladder catheterisation after vaginal prolapse surgery is advantageous.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                A large training hospital in the Netherlands.
                Patients undergoing anterior colporrhaphy.
                One hundred patients were included. Patients were randomised into two groups. In one group (n= 50), a transurethral catheter was in place for four days post-operatively and removed on the fifth post-operative day. In the other group (n= 50), catheterisation was not prolonged and the catheter was removed the morning after surgery. Residual volumes after removal of the catheter were measured by ultrasound scanning. Where residual volumes of >200 mL were found the patient was recatheterised for three more days. Urinary cultures were taken before removal of the catheter. Six patients were excluded: four in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and two in the not prolonged catheterisation group.
                Need for recatheterisation, urinary tract infection, mean duration of catheterisation and hospital stay.
                Residual volumes exceeding 200 mL and need for recatheterisation occurred in 9% in the standard prolonged catheterisation group versus 40% of patients in the not prolonged catheterisation group (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.045-0.47). Positive urine cultures were found in 40% of cases in the standard prolonged catheterisation group compared with 4% in the not prolonged catheterisation group (OR 15, 95% CI 3.2-68.6). Mean duration of catheterisation was 5.3 days in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and 2.3 days in the not prolonged catheterisation group (P < 0.001). Mean duration of hospitalisation was 7 days in the standard prolonged catheterisation group and 5.7 days in the not prolonged group (P < 0.001).
                The disadvantages of prolonged catheterisation outweigh the advantages, therefore, removal of the catheter on the morning after surgery may be preferable and longer term catheterisation should only be undertaken where there are specific indications. Resumption of normal voiding is necessary before prostatectomy patients can be discharged from hospital. This study assesses the effect upon this of the timing of catheter removal. This article describes a study that compares the outcomes of midnight versus early morning urethral catheter removal after transurethral resection of the prostate. SUBJECTS AND SETTING/METHODS: The research setting was a large, metropolitan hospital in Sydney, Australia. Forty-eight patients who had undergone transurethral resection of the prostate were randomly assigned to either group A, catheter removal at 2400 hours (n = 20), or group B, catheter removal at 0600 hours (n = 28).
                Data collected included time to first void, volume of first void, time between catheter removal and discharge from hospital, weight of prostatic resection, and tissue pathology.
                There was no significant difference between the 2 groups with respect to pathology, weight of prostatic resection, mean volume of first void, or time to first void after catheter removal. There was a significant difference in the time between catheter removal and discharge from hospital. Eighty-five percent of those having catheters removed at 2400 hours were discharged on the same day as catheter removal, as compared with 65% of those who underwent catheter removal at 0600 hours (chi 2 = 12.684; P < 0.005).
                After transurethral resection of the prostate, removal of the urethral catheter at 2400 hours reduced the length of hospital stay, but did not significantly affect the time to first void or the volume of the first void. The post surgical urinary retention syndrome is a frequent problem after vaginal surgery. In many medical centers it is used a transurethral vesical drainage for three to five days with or without vesical reeducation to prevent it. In order to determine the importance of the time of drainage and vesical reeducation in the presence of this syndrome 106 patients submitted to vaginal surgery were studied at random and prospectively, in our service. Patients were distributed in three groups: the first one, with 37 women in which the drainage was withdrawn at 24 hours; in the second group it was retired at 72 hours and in the third group the drainage was removed at 72 hours with previous vesical reeducation. The results show that those patients who were less time under vesical drainage presented a minor frequency of urinary retention after surgery (24.3% vs 30.7% and 43.7%). A total of 60 patients with acute urinary retention were studied to establish whether a trial without a catheter was justified and to identify subgroups of patients most likely to benefit from this practice. The patients were randomly allocated to 3 groups; the catheters were removed either immediately after the bladder was emptied, or 24 or 48 h later; 17 patients urinated satisfactorily after removal of the catheter. Re-establishment of micturition was not associated with the length of history or severity of symptoms of prostatism, with age or the presence of urinary tract infection. The mean retained volume of urine in patients with a satisfactory result was 786 ml and 1069 ml in the failures. Of the 34 patients with retained volumes of less than 900 ml, 15 were successful in re-establishing micturition compared with 2 of 26 of those with retained volumes greater than 900 ml. The time of catheter removal was not important. The 17 successful patients were reviewed 6 months later. None reported further urinary retention; 6 had required prostatectomy for severe symptoms, 6 had minor symptoms and 5 were symptomless. It was concluded that a trial without a catheter is worthwhile, since 11 of 60 patients had not required surgery, but it should be avoided in patients with a residual volume exceeding 900 ml. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness of two approaches to urinary catheter management in controlling postoperative urinary dysfunction in 110 patients following abdominoperineal resection or low anterior bowel resection. Patients, stratified by sex and surgical procedure, were randomly assigned to either straight gravity drainage or a 6-day progressive catheter clamping program. The bladder training program following abdominoperineal resection reduced significantly the urinary dysfunction rate in women but not in men. Marked differences in dysfunction rates were related to type of surgery, gender, and surgeon. Etiology of postoperative voiding dysfunction in various groups is discussed. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of reconditioning upon bladder dysfunction caused by prolonged catheterization. Eight women undergoing surgery with baseline residual urine volumes (RUVs) not greater than 25 ml and catheterization durations of 36 to 106 hours qualified as subjects. Immediately prior to catheter removal, the four treatment group subjects received reconditioning, a procedure in which their catheters were clamped for three hours followed by five minutes of urinary drainage. This cycle was repeated twice more, totaling nine hours, ten minutes. The four control group subjects received no reconditioning. After catheter removal, reconditioned subjects resumed natural micturition significantly sooner than non-reconditioned subjects (t = -2.82, df = 6, p less than 0.05). A t test showed no significant differences between the groups in post-indwelling catheterization RUVs following the first micturition, probably due to the small number of subjects, since the control group's mean post-catheterization RUV increased to a physiologically abnormal level (42.25 ml), while the reconditioned group's mean RUV stayed within normal limits. This study should be repeated to test for statistical significance in larger samples. A randomised controlled trial was undertaken to determine the effects of midnight removal of urinary catheters on patients' voiding patterns and subsequent discharge from hospital. Patients whose urinary catheters were removed at midnight showed a greater volume of initial void than those whose catheters were removed at the usual time of 0600. Removal of urinary catheters routinely at midnight permits earlier assessment of patients' voiding, which may allow for earlier discharge from hospital. To investigate whether early catheter removal following transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) is safe and whether it has any effect on the length of hospital stay.
                Following transurethral prostatectomy 59 patients were randomized into one of two groups: those whose catheter was removed on day 1 after surgery and those whose catheter was removed on day 2. The incidence of complications and the duration of post-operative hospital stay were assessed.
                Catheter removal on day 1 led to a significantly shorter post-operative hospital stay (2.3 days versus 3.3 days) and did not incur a higher incidence of complications.
                Removal of the catheter on the first day following TURP is safe in selected patients and leads to a shorter post-operative hospital stay. This prospective study was done to see if reducing transurethral Foley catheterization from 3 days to 1 would lead to fewer urinary tract infections without an increase in voiding problems. Ninety-one women undergoing retropubic surgery for stress urinary incontinence (Burch or Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz) were randomized to either 1 or 3 days' catheterization. Antibiotics were not used. Infection was diagnosed in 9 (20.0%) patients in the 1-day group and in 16 (34.8%) in the 3-day group. Delayed voiding occurred in 13 (28.9%) and 10 (21.7%) patients, respectively, and 5 (11.1%) and 3 (6.5%), respectively, received a new catheter. The differences do not reach statistical significance. Therefore, catheter time may safely be reduced to 1 day. This may lead to fewer infections but also somewhat more voiding problems. If a transurethral catheter is to be used, on balance the two regimens are equivalent. There has been no consensus on the best catheterization strategy for the management of postoperative urinary retention. A prospective randomized trial was undertaken to establish the best practice guidelines for the management of postoperative urinary retention. The authors also evaluated the contemporary incidence of urinary retention following different categories of general surgery and examined risk factors associated with its occurrence.
                All patients who underwent elective inpatient surgery between January 2002 and June 2003 were recruited into the study. Patients who developed postoperative urinary retention were randomized to either having in-out catheterization or placement of an indwelling catheter for 24 h after surgery.
                A total of 1448 patients was recruited. The overall incidence of urinary retention was 4.1% (n = 60). Significant risk factors associated with postoperative urinary retention included old age, anorectal procedures and use of spinal anaesthesia. Comparison of re-catheterization and urinary tract infection rates between patients who were treated with in-out versus overnight catheterization found no significant differences.
                Postoperative urinary retention should be managed by in-out catheterization. Indwelling catheterization for 24 h appeared to bestow no additional benefits. The incidence of urinary retention increases with age, anorectal procedures and the use of spinal anaesthesia. To examine the effect of bladder infusion before catheter removal on patients' readiness for discharge and the day of discharge after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
                The study comprised 75 consecutive patients undergoing TURP who were randomized to either have their catheter removed in the standard manner (38 patients), or to undergo bladder infusion before a trial of voiding (ToV) on the second day after TURP (37 patients).
                In those undergoing bladder infusion, seven (19%) patients were discharged on the same day as their ToV, compared with five (13%) in the standard group. Of the 75 patients, 15 (68%) were discharged by the third day after TURP whether or not the bladder had been filled. In the infusion group, 23 (62%) were ready for discharge on the same day as their TOV, compared with only 14 (37%) in the standard group (P < 0.05).
                Bladder infusion before a ToV after TURP significantly increases the rate of readiness for discharge, allowing an early decision to discharge on the second day in a large proportion of patients. In the fields of both nursing and medicine there is a dearth of published literature on the optimum time to remove indwelling urinary catheters (IDCs) following urological surgery. Tradition seems to be in favour of removing IDCs at 0600 hours despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. This study was undertaken to determine whether midnight removal of IDCs resulted in patients' resuming normal voiding patterns. A prospective clinical trial was conducted to determine the impact midnight removal of urinary catheters would have on the patients' voiding pattern, and subsequent discharge from hospital. One hundred and sixty patients were entered into the study. The patients were allocated at random to have their urinary catheter removed either at midnight or at 0600 hours. Patients who had their catheters removed at midnight passed a greater volume of urine with both their first (268 ml compared with 177 ml; P<0.0001) and second voids (322 ml compared with 195 ml; P<0.0001) than their counterparts in the 0600 group. This permitted earlier discharge from hospital. The results reported in this study support the findings of earlier research that midnight removal of IDC leads to an earlier resumption of normal voiding patterns, permits earlier discharge from hospital and appears to reduce patients' anxiety. The recommendation from this study is that there should be a change in hospital policy so that the majority of IDCs are removed at midnight.
There is suggestive but inconclusive evidence of a benefit from midnight removal of the indwelling urethral catheter. There are resource implications but the magnitude of these is not clear from the trials. The evidence also suggests shorter hospital stay after early rather than delayed catheter removal but the effects on other outcomes are unclear. There is little evidence on which to judge other aspects of management, such as catheter clamping.