A randomized comparison of different methods of analgesia in abortion using manual vacuum aspiration. Is ward evacuation for uncomplicated incomplete abortion under systemic analgesia safe and effective? A randomised clinical trial. Pain relief using paracervical block in patients undergoing manual vacuum aspiration of uterus. Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial. Anaesthesia for evacuation of retained products of conception. Comparison between alfentanil plus etomidate and fentanyl plus thiopentone. Bolus application of remifentanil with propofol for dilatation and curettage.
To estimate the effectiveness of different methods of analgesia among women treated with manual vacuum aspiration for spontaneous abortion.
                The 113 patients diagnosed with incomplete abortion and considered candidates for manual vacuum aspiration were randomly assigned to 3 groups of analgesic administration: diclofenac plus paracervical block; meperidine plus diclofenac; and meperidine alone. Pain levels were evaluated using the Wong Scale of Pain.
                The mean pain scores for the three groups were: diclofenac and paracervical block 5.4; meperidine plus diclofenac 5.0; meperidine 5.7 (P=0.57). Analysis of pain using the levels mild (0-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) showed no statistical significance among the 3 groups of analgesics. Adverse effects were more common in the groups using analgesia containing meperidine.
                There was no significant difference between the analgesics used among the 3 groups. Most of the patients, regardless of the analgesic used, reported moderate pain. To compare evacuation under systemic analgesia (fentanyl and midazolam) in a treatment room (ward group) with evacuation under general anaesthesia in theatre.
                A prospective randomised clinical trial.
                A tertiary medical centre serving a black urban population.
                One hundred and forty-two patients with uncomplicated incomplete abortions.
                Randomisation into two groups, those for evacuation under systemic analgesia and those for evacuation under general anaesthesia.
                Both groups were compared in terms of safety, efficacy, acceptability, blood consumption and time delay between admission and evacuation.
                Significantly less blood was used in the ward group (37 units for 13 patients) than in the theatre group (65 units for 24 patients) (P < 0.03). Significantly less time was taken between admission and evacuation in the ward group (median 7 hours 15 minutes) than in the theatre group (median 12 hours 38 minutes) (P < 0.0003). Evacuation under fentanyl and midazolam was safe, effective and acceptable for the majority of patients compared with evacuation under general anaesthesia.
                Patients with uncomplicated incomplete abortions (uterine size equivalent to a pregnancy of 14 weeks' duration or less) can undergo evacuation safely and effectively under fentanyl and midazolam and have a significantly smaller chance of requiring a blood transfusion. To evaluate pain relief using paracervical nerve block with 1% lignocaine injection in patients undergoing uterine evacuation by Manual Vacuum Aspiration (MVA) for the treatment of incomplete abortion.
                A randomized double blind clinical trial.
                Marie Stopes Health Centre, Nairobi.
                One hundred and forty two patients were recruited between September and October 1997. The intervention was random assignment to the study group (paracervical block with 1% lignocaine) or the placebo group (paracervical block with sterile water for injection). Intra and post operative assessment of pain was made using McGills and facial expression scales.
                The untreated group experienced significantly more pain than the treated group, especially lower abdominal pain and backache. The pain was especially marked intraoperatively, less so 30 minutes post-operatively.
                Based on the findings of this study, any patient going for manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion should be given Paracervical block as it is cost effective, easy to perform and with less side effects. To estimate the effectiveness of paracervical block in controlling pain among women treated with manual vacuum aspiration for an incomplete abortion
                A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Nuestra Señora de Altagracia, a maternal and perinatal referral hospital in the Dominican Republic. The sample size was based on a clinical difference of 1.5 points in the level of pain measured with the visual analog scale using 90% power and a sampling error of 0.04. Women who were at 12 weeks of gestation or less with an incomplete abortion were eligible to participate. They were randomly assigned to receive either the standard treatment of care (manual vacuum aspiration for uterine evacuation with psychological support but no paracervical block) or manual vacuum aspiration treatment with psychological support and paracervical block using 1.0% lidocaine. Patients with active infections, severe illnesses, psychiatric disorders, or allergies to lidocaine were excluded. Intraoperative pain as reported by the women and as documented by an external observer was measured.
                Although the paracervical block technique used showed a slight reduction in severe pain, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences in intraoperative pain between the 2 groups (relative risk 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 1.23) with 50% of all patients registering 7 or higher score on a visual analog pain scale of 0-10. However, statistically significant differences were found in each group when comparing the level of preoperative and intraoperative pain described by the patient (P <.001). The manual vacuum aspiration technique and the paracervical block were not accompanied by complications.
                The paracervical block technique used in this study along with psychological support was comparable with pain control using psychological support alone; neither pain management regimen provided sufficient pain control. It is recommended that randomized comparative studies be designed to determine the effectiveness of other paracervical block techniques and the efficacy of the use of analgesics in patients suffering from incomplete abortion treated with manual vacuum aspiration. Forty-four patients presenting for evacuation of retained products of conception were anaesthetized with either fentanyl and thiopentone, or alfentanil with etomidate, along with 70% nitrous oxide in oxygen. There was no difference between the two techniques in indices of immediate recovery (time to opening eyes and obeying a simple command), but the rate of return of higher mental functions (assessed by a coin counting test) was significantly better using the alfentanil-etomidate technique. There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques for apnoea or abnormal movements during anaesthesia, but alfentanil with etomidate was associated with significantly more pain on injection and a higher frequency of postoperative vomiting (40%). This study was designed to determine which single bolus dose of remifentanil in combination with propofol and nitrous oxide is best to control the haemodynamic, autonomous and somatic responses in patients scheduled for dilatation and curettage of the uterine cervix. We evaluated the adequacy of different bolus doses of remifentanil, associated with propofol and nitrous oxide, for dilatation and curettage in a prospective double-blind study.
                After institutional approval and informed consent, 34 healthy females undergoing curettage to remove material from the uterus after spontaneous abortion were randomized to receive remifentanil 0.5 microg kg(-1) intravenously (i.v.) (Group A; n = 4), 1 microg kg(-1) i.v. (Group B; n = 15) or 1.5 microg kg(-1) i.v. (Group C; n = 15), with propofol 2 mg kg (-1) i.v. in all groups. Anaesthesia was maintained with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Haemodynamic, somatic and autonomic signs of light anaesthesia were registered to assess the response to surgical stress. Recovery times and Aldrete score were recorded at the end of the procedure.
                The groups were similar with regard to biometric data and duration of surgery. The poor results using the lowest dose of remifentanil obliged us to abandon this dose. The total dose of remifentanil was larger in Group C (100 +/- 5.7 microg vs. 65 +/- 4.1 microg in Group B; P < 0.05), but more patients required extra bolus injections in Group B (69% vs. 38% in Group C; P < 0.01). Recovery times were significantly shorter in Group C. Aldrete scores when leaving the operation room was similar.
                Remifentanil 1.5 microg kg(-1) i.v. with propofol 2 mg kg(-1) i.v. and 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen provided the best anaesthetic control with the fastest recovery times.
Particular considerations that influence the choice of anaesthesia for this procedure such as availability, effectiveness, safety, side effects, practitioner's choice, costs and woman's preferences of each technique should continue to be used until more evidence supporting the use of one technique or another.