Depo Now: preventing unintended pregnancies among adolescents and young adults. Bleeding patterns after immediate vs. conventional oral contraceptive initiation: a randomized, controlled trial. Bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of an oral compared with a vaginal hormonal contraceptive. Same-day initiation of the transdermal hormonal delivery system (contraceptive patch) versus traditional initiation methods. Initiation of oral contraceptives using a quick start compared with a conventional start: a randomized controlled trial.
We compared the immediate administration of DMPA (Depo Now) to the immediate use of short-term hormonal methods that served as a "bridge method" until later DMPA initiation. We examined whether Depo Now, as compared to initiating with a bridge method (pills, transdermal patch, or vaginal ring), resulted in greater DMPA continuation at six months.
                Young women aged 14 to 26 years seeking to use DMPA were randomized (nonblinded) after meeting eligibility criteria to either the Depo Now (n = 101) or bridge method (n = 232) group. Depo Now subjects received their first injection of DMPA at the conclusion of their first visit provided each was medically suitable and had a negative urine pregnancy test regardless of menstrual cycle day. Those assigned to the bridge method group were allowed to choose their starting contraceptive method and it was provided at the first visit. All subjects were told to return to the clinic in 21 days to repeat the urine pregnancy test, and among those who were assigned to use a bridge method, to receive their first injection of DMPA. All subjects were followed to their third injection, or about 6 months later.
                Those randomized to a bridge method were 1.8 (1.1, 2.9) times more likely than Depo Now subjects to return for their 21-day repeat pregnancy test, but only 55% (n = 125) of these young women actually received their first DMPA injection. Continuation rates at the third injection were 29.7% (n = 30) for those in the Depo Now group and 21.1% (n = 49) for those assigned to the bridge method (p = .09). Three factors were significantly associated with adherence to the third injection: randomized to Depo Now group, knowing more women who use DMPA, and returning to clinic for the 21-day repeat pregnancy test visit. Finally, 28 pregnancies were diagnosed during the study period, and those in the bridge method group were almost 4.0 (1.2, 13.4) times more likely to be diagnosed with a pregnancy than those in the Depo Now group.
                Immediate administration of DMPA is associated with improved adherence to DMPA continuation and fewer pregnancies. To compare bleeding patterns after immediate vs. conventional oral contraceptive (OC) initiation.
                Randomized controlled trial.
                University-based clinic.
                One hundred thirteen women initiating combination OCs.
                Participants received a 4-month supply of a monophasic 35-microg ethinyl E(2) (EE) OC and a bleeding diary, were randomized to immediate or conventional OC start, underwent monthly telephone follow-up, and after 90 days returned the diary and completed an exit interview.
                Total number of bleeding-spotting days, using the World Health Organization 90-day reference period method. Comparisons were made by trial assignment (immediate vs. conventional) and cycle day of OC initiation (day 8+ vs. days 1-7).
                There was no significant difference in the number of bleeding-spotting days (mean difference: -0.5 days; 95% CI: -3.4 to 2.3) or any other bleeding parameter between the immediate and conventional starters, or days 1-7 and day 8+ starters.
                Immediate start of OCs does not induce bleeding patterns different from conventional starting regimens. Concern about adverse bleeding patterns should not be considered a justification for instructing women to wait until menses before starting OCs. This study compared 84-day bleeding patterns after immediate initiation of a triphasic oral contraceptive with a 25-mug daily dose of ethinyl estradiol (E2) compared with the contraceptive vaginal ring, which has a 15-mug daily dose of ethinyl E2.
                This was an open-label controlled trial. We randomly assigned 201 women to immediate start of a contraceptive pill or immediate start of the ring in a 1:1 allocation ratio. Our primary outcome was difference in mean bleeding-spotting days per woman according to treatment assignment. Secondary outcomes were differences in World Health Organization-defined menstrual indices, differences in perceived bleeding changes, and differences in bleeding according to cycle day at the start of method.
                The mean bleeding-spotting days in the 84-day reference period for all subjects was 19.2 days (17.0 days for ring users and 21.4 days for pill users, mean difference 4.4 days). Using the World Health Organization menstrual indices, the ring users experienced fewer days or episodes of bleeding-spotting and shorter intervals. Among ring users, no baseline characteristics were associated with bleeding outcomes. Older nulliparous pill users, however, reported more bleeding-spotting days. Significantly more ring users reported a decrease in duration of bleeding compared with pill users (P < .01). We found no significant differences in bleeding patterns based on analysis of cycle day at study enrollment.
                Our study shows advantageous bleeding patterns for subjects using the contraceptive vaginal ring. It also confirms our previous findings that immediate start of hormonal contraception is an acceptable alternative to waiting for menses.
                II-1. Published comparisons of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) initiation methods demonstrate that OCP initiation at the office visit ("Quick Start") resulted in higher continuation rates into the second cycle. This trial was performed to investigate whether Quick Start with the contraceptive patch would provide similar results.
                Sixty women were randomized to initiate use of the contraceptive patch using Quick Start (Group 1, n=30) or on the first day of their next menses (Group 2, n=30). Telephone contact at 6 weeks occurred to ensure that the second cycle had been initiated. A single follow-up visit was scheduled after completion of the third patch cycle.
                Continuation rates for Groups 1 and 2 were 97% and 93% (p=1.0), respectively, into the second cycle, and 93% and 90%, respectively, into the third cycle (p=1.0). Only approximately half of the subjects planned to continue using the patch after the study.
                Quick Start for the contraceptive patch did not improve continuation rates into the second or third cycle. To estimate whether young women taking the first pill on the day of prescription had higher continuation rates and lower pregnancy rates than women who waited until menses to start the oral contraceptive pill (OCP).
                We recruited 1,716 women aged younger than 25 years seeking to initiate the oral contraceptive at three publicly funded family planning clinics, and randomly assigned them to conventional initiation of the pill (conventional start) or immediate, directly observed ingestion of the first pill (quick start) during the clinic visit. Women underwent follow-up interviews at 3 and 6 months.
                Sixty percent of participants discontinued the pill, and 8% became pregnant during follow-up. Women who took the first pill in the clinic were more likely to continue to the second OCP pack (odds ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.0-2.1.); however, the Quick Start approach did not improve OCP continuation rates at 3 and 6 months. Those assigned to Quick Start were slightly less likely to become pregnant within 6 months from the time they started the pill (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.64-1.25). Eighty-one percent of women rated the Quick Start approach as acceptable or preferable to waiting. Rates of serious adverse events were low and similar in the two groups.
                Protocols that require a woman to wait until the next menses to start hormonal contraceptives are an obstacle to contraceptive initiation. Directly observed, immediate initiation of the pill improves short-term continuation.
                ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00068848
We found limited evidence that immediate start of hormonal contraception reduces unintended pregnancies or increases method continuation. However, the pregnancy rate was lower with immediate start of DMPA versus another method. Some differences were associated with contraceptive type rather than initiation method, i.e., immediate ring versus immediate COC. More studies are needed of immediate versus conventional start of the same hormonal contraceptive.