Intravenous immune globulin (10% caprylate-chromatography purified) for the treatment of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (ICE study): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Randomized controlled trial of IVIg in untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: a double blind, placebo controlled study. A novel trial design to study the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. A plasma exchange versus immune globulin infusion trial in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Randomized controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin versus oral prednisolone in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.
Short-term studies suggest that intravenous immunoglobulin might reduce disability caused by chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) but long-term effects have not been shown. We aimed to establish whether 10% caprylate-chromatography purified immune globulin intravenous (IGIV-C) has short-term and long-term benefit in patients with CIDP.
                117 patients with CIDP who met specific neurophysiological inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) criteria participated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, response-conditional crossover trial. IGIV-C (Gamunex) or placebo was given every 3 weeks for up to 24 weeks in an initial treatment period, and patients who did not show an improvement in INCAT disability score of 1 point or more received the alternate treatment in a crossover period. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who had maintained an improvement from baseline in adjusted INCAT disability score of 1 point or more through to week 24. Patients who showed an improvement and completed 24 weeks of treatment were eligible to be randomly re-assigned in a blinded 24-week extension phase. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00220740.
                During the first period, 32 of 59 (54%) patients treated with IGIV-C and 12 of 58 (21%) patients who received placebo had an improvement in adjusted INCAT disability score that was maintained through to week 24 (treatment difference 33.5%, 95% CI 15.4-51.7; p=0.0002). Improvements from baseline to endpoint were also recorded for grip strength in the dominant hand (treatment difference 10.9 kPa, 4.6-17.2; p=0.0008) and the non-dominant hand (8.6 kPa, 2.6-14.6; p=0.005). Results were similar during the crossover period. During the extension phase, participants who continued to receive IGIV-C had a longer time to relapse than did patients treated with placebo (p=0.011). The incidence of serious adverse events per infusion was 0.8% (9/1096) with IGIV-C versus 1.9% (11/575) with placebo. The most common adverse events with IGIV-C were headache, pyrexia, and hypertension.
                This study, the largest reported trial of any CIDP treatment, shows the short-term and long-term efficacy and safety of IGIV-C and supports use of IGIV-C as a therapy for CIDP. Thirty patients with definite or probable chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) of chronic progressive (16 patients) or relapsing (14 patients) course were randomly assigned to receive intravenous immunoglobulin (IvIg) 0.4 g per kg body weight or a placebo treatment on 5 consecutive days in a double-blind, cross-over trial. Neurological function was monitored by serial quantitative assessments [neurological disability score (NDS); clinical grade (CG) and grip strength (GS) measurements] and by electrophysiological studies before and after each treatment period. Twenty-five patients completed both treatment periods. A comparison of the observed changes in clinical outcome measures revealed statistically significant differences in favour of IvIg, with (mean +/- SD) improvements in NDS by 24.4 +/- 5.4 points (P < 0.002) in CG by 1 +/- 0.3 points (P < 0.001) in GS by +6.3 +/- 1.7 kg (P < 0.005), whereas scores were unchanged or worse with placebo. A secondary two-groups analysis of the first trial period included all 30 patients; 16 patients had been randomly assigned to IvIg and 14 to placebo treatments. Again significant differences in favour of IvIg were observed in all the clinical end-points: improvement in NDS was 35.6 +/- 25 points (P < 0.0001), in CG it was 1.3 +/- 1.9 points (P < 0.002) and in GS +9.8 +/- 7.7 kg (P < 0.001), whereas all scores worsened with placebo. Of the 30 patients, 19 (63%) improved with IvIg treatments; nine out of 16 patients (56%) with chronic progressive CIDP, and 10 out of 14 patients (71%) with relapsing CIDP (differences were not statistically significant). A placebo response was seen in five patients. Comparison of paired electrophysiological measurements before and 4 weeks after IvIg treatments revealed statistically significant improvements in the summed motor conduction velocities (sigma MCV; P < -0.0001) and in the summed compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) evoked with proximal stimulation (sigma proximal CMAP, P < 0.03) of median, ulnar, peroneal and tibial nerves. Eight of nine IvIg responders with chronic progressive CIDP improved gradually to normal function with a single 5 day course of IvIg; in five of these, small doses of prednisone were prescribed during follow-up. In 10 IvIg responders with relapsing CIDP, improvements lasted a median 6 weeks (range 3-22 weeks) and was reproducible with open label treatments. All 10 patients have been maintained and stabilized with IvIg pulse therapy of 1 g per kg body weight or less, given as a single infusion prior to the expected relapse. A beneficial response to IvIg was found to be most likely in patients with acute relapse or with disease of one year or less. Patients with predominantly sensory signs did not improve. To determine the efficacy of IV immunoglobulin (IVIg) given patients with untreated chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP).
                A randomized, double-blind, multicenter, investigator-initiated study compared IVIg (Aventis Behring LLC, King of Prussia, PA) with placebo (5% albumin). On days 1, 2, and 21, IVIg (1 g/kg) or placebo was given. The primary outcome measure was the change in muscle strength from baseline to day 42, using the average muscle score (AMS). Secondary outcome measures included change from baseline AMS at days 10 and 21, the Hughes' functional disability scale, forced vital capacity (FVC), and nerve conduction studies (NCS) of four motor nerves (median, ulnar, peroneal, and tibial).
                The patients (n = 33) were randomized. Of these, 30 (14 women, 16 men, aged 54 +/- 20 years, range 13 to 82) received IVIg and 23 were given placebo (12 women, 11 men, aged 50 +/- 18 years, range 23 to 73). Baseline AMS values of the groups were similar (IVIg 7.06 +/- 1.31 versus placebo 7.28 +/- 1.18, p = 0.53). There were two dropouts in placebo group and one in the IVIg group. Mean AMS improved at day 42 comparing IVIg with placebo (0.63 versus -0.1, p = 0.006). Improved strength was seen by day 10. The placebo group lost strength over this same interval. In the IVIg, 11 subjects improved by the functional disability scale; none worsened. This differed (p = 0.019) from those in the placebo-treated group (two improved, two got worse, remainder unchanged). Forced vital capacity did not improve with IVIg treatment. IVIg improved ulnar motor distal latency (p = 0.005), tibial distal compound muscle amplitude (p = 0.003), and peroneal nerve conduction velocity (p = 0.03).
                IVIg improves strength in patients with untreated CIDP by day 10 with continued benefit through day 42; more than one third improve by at least a functional grade on a disability scale. This study provides data supporting IVIg as the initial treatment for CIDP. Patients with a clinical diagnosis of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) were randomised in a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial to investigate whether high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (IVIg) for 5 consecutive days has a beneficial effect. Fifteen patients were randomised to IVIg and 13 to placebo. In the IVIg treatment group 4 patients improved and 3 patients in the placebo group. The degree of improvement of the patients in the IVIg treatment group was no different from the patients in the placebo group. Electrophysiological studies did not show significant differences between the groups. Since a previously performed cross-over trial showed that a selected group of CIDP patients responded better to IVIg than to placebo, it is concluded that we need better criteria to select CIDP patients for treatment with IVIg. Using a novel trial design, we prospectively examined the effect of intravenous immunoglobulin in seven patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study. We suggest that the commonly used manual muscle testing and Rankin scale are not sufficiently sensitive to measure changes in CIDP and should not be used as isolated outcome measures. We propose a timed 10-m walk, the Nine-Hole Peg Test, the Hammersmith Motor Ability Score, and myometry as alternative measures which are valid, reliable and sensitive. Our trial design permitted the measurement of a treatment response in three responders despite different patterns of disability typical of the broad clinical picture seen in CIDP. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy is a paralytic syndrome, causing considerable disability and even death. In controlled clinical trials, plasma exchange prevented or ameliorated neurological deficits, but the efficacy of immune globulin infusion remains unproved. Also unknown is whether immune globulin infusion is as effective, or more effective, than plasma exchange and what dosages and frequencies are best. In this observer-blinded study, using some objective end points not subject to bias (e.g., summated compound muscle action potential), 20 patients with progressive or static polyneuropathy were randomly assigned to receive either of the two treatments for 6 weeks, followed by a washout period, and then were assigned to receive the other treatment. Plasma exchange (twice a week for 3 weeks then once a week for 3 weeks) and immune globulin infusion (0.4 gm/kg once a week for 3 weeks, then 0.2 gm/kg once a week for the next 3 weeks) were used. End points assessed before and after treatment schedules were neurological disability score; muscle weakness of the neurological disability score; summated compound muscle action potentials of ulnar, median, and peroneal nerves; summated sensory nerve action potentials of ulnar and sural nerves; and vibratory detection threshold of the great toe using CASE IV. Observers were masked as to treatment used. Of 20 patients, 13 received both treatments whereas 4 did not worsen sufficiently to receive the second treatment--1 patient left the study during and 2 after the first treatment to receive unscheduled treatment elsewhere.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial compared a six week course of oral prednisolone tapering from 60 mg to 10 mg daily with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) 2.0 g/kg given over one to two days for treating chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). Twenty-four of the thirty-two randomized patients completed both treatment periods. Both treatments produced significant improvements in the primary outcome measure, change in an 11-point disability scale two weeks after randomization. There was slightly, but not significantly, more improvement after IVIg than with prednisolone, the mean difference between the groups in change in disability grade being 0.16 (95% CI = -0.35 to 0.66). There were also slightly, but not significantly, greater improvements favoring IVIg in the secondary outcome measures: time to walk 10 meters after two weeks and improvement in disability grade after six weeks. Results may have been biased against IVIg by the eight patients who did not complete the second arm of the trial. A serious adverse event (psychosis) attributable to treatment occurred in one patient while on prednisolone and in none with IVIg.
The evidence from randomised controlled trials shows that intravenous immunoglobulin improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with a number needed to treat of 3.00. During this period it has similar efficacy to plasma exchange and oral prednisolone. In one large trial, benefit of IVIg persisted for 24 and possibly 48 weeks.