The impact of health education on frequency and cost of health care use by low income children with asthma. Improving the psychological status of children with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Educating young children about asthma: comparing the effectiveness of a developmentally appropriate asthma education video tape and picture book. A controlled study of education for improving compliance with cromolyn sodium (Intal): the importance of physician-patient communication. The impact of a self-administered behavioral intervention program on pediatric asthma. A randomized trial of A.C.T. (asthma care training) for kids. Impact of a nurse-led home management training programme in children admitted to hospital with acute asthma: a randomised controlled study. [Outcome of structured asthma education in childhood and adolescence]. Asthma self-management programmes in a population of Italian children: a multicentric study. Italian Study Group on Asthma Self-Management Programmes. Asthma education by community child health nurses. A study of a Self-Care Rehabilitation Program in pediatric asthma. Self-management education of children with asthma: AIR WISE. Education of parents of infants and very young children with asthma: a developmental evaluation of the Wee Wheezers program. An assessment of the value of health education in the prevention of childhood asthma. A school health education program for children with asthma aged 8-11 years. Asthma at the interface: bridging the gap between general practice and a district general hospital. Teaching self-management skills to asthmatic children and their parents in an ambulatory care setting. Evaluation of a school-based asthma education program for inner-city children. An asthma self-management program for children, including instruction in peak flow monitoring by school nurses. Learning to cope with asthma: a behavioural self-management program for children. Effects of self-care instruction on asthmatic children. Educational intervention by computer in childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial testing the use of a new teaching intervention in childhood asthma. Effects of a behavioral treatment program on children with asthma. A pilot study of the multidisciplinary management of childhood asthma in a family practice. A Bristol experience: benefits and cost of an 'asthma nurse' visiting the homes of asthmatic children. The effect of a patient education program on emergency room use for inner-city children with asthma. A health education program for children with asthma. Evaluation of a community-based asthma management program in a population sample of schoolchildren. Controlled trial of a home and ambulatory program for asthmatic children. Effectiveness of a nurse-managed program for children with chronic asthma.
A sample of 310 low income urban children with asthma from 290 families was randomized into a control group and an experimental group that received health education to improve asthma management at home. No significant decreases in subsequent health care use were observed when the experimental group was compared to the control group without regard to previous hospitalization. When the comparison was restricted to children who had been hospitalized during the preceding year, however, the experimental group was found to have decreased its use of the emergency room significantly more than the control group (p less than 0.05) and to have experienced a significantly greater reduction in the mean number of hospitalizations (p less than 0.05) during the year of follow-up. The program reduced health care costs for children with one or more hospitalizations, saving $11.22 for every $1.00 spent to deliver health education. Children with asthma are at special risk for problems in psychological functioning, as are children with other chronic illnesses. We conducted a controlled trial of a combined education and stress management program among children ages 6 to 14 years with asthma. Eighty-one children were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group; 56 children completed data collection, 29 intervention and 27 control. Psychological status was assessed by the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) before and after the intervention, as were children's knowledge of asthma, stress (as measured by children's life events), and functional status (as indicated by such activities as school attendance, time playing with friends, and daily chore performance). Children in the intervention group had a significant improvement in the total Behavior Problems score (p less than .04) and Internalizing scale (p less than .01) on the CBCL and a significant increase in daily chores (p less than .04) compared with the control group. Before intervention, the two groups had statistically significant positive relationships between negative life events and behavior problems scores. After intervention, children in the control group still demonstrated a significant relationship between negative life events and total and Internalizing Behavior Problem scores, although participation in the intervention group negated that relationship. Children in the intervention group whose knowledge of asthma increased were more likely to report an increase in daily chores (p less than .02). We conclude that the intervention had a beneficial effect on psychological status and on children's daily activities. The effect may have occurred in part by decreasing the likelihood that perceived stress from negative life events led to poorer adjustment. Asthma self-management programmes have been shown to increase children's knowledge about asthma and improve their management practices and health status. However, existing programmes have rarely addressed the unique learning needs of very young children. This study aimed to develop and assess the effectiveness of a video tape and picture book designed to teach children about the prevention and management of acute episodes of asthma. The information content of the educational resources was determined by analysis of relevant medical information and asthma management skills. Social Learning Theory and consideration of the developmental stage of the target population informed the format and style of presentation of the resources. Eighty children aged between 2 and 5 years who had been diagnosed with asthma by their medical practitioner and who required daily asthma medication participated in a controlled experimental study. The study evaluated the impact of the asthma education resources on children's knowledge about asthma, compliance with medication regimens and health status. Children were randomly allocated to one of three experimental groups. Children in these groups were exposed to either the video tape alone, the book alone or both the video tape and book, or to a control group who viewed materials unrelated to asthma. The results for the three experimental groups were compared with the control group who did not receive exposure to any of the asthma education resources. The results showed that children in each experimental group had significantly greater gains in asthma-related knowledge than children in the control group and children exposed to both resources showed the greatest increases in knowledge. Children in each of the three experimental groups also had better compliance and health than children in the control group. These findings indicate that carefully designed asthma education resources are useful for providing even the youngest children with information about asthma and its management. The effectiveness of an educational program to increase compliance with cromolyn sodium was assessed in 31 children and adolescents 6 to 17 years of age. Patients were randomly assigned to an education or noneducation group. A standard education program regarding asthma and asthma medications was provided to the education group during four monthly visits. At each visit, all patients were assessed in terms of knowledge of asthma and medications, asthma-related symptoms, and pulmonary function. Patients were also asked to self-rate their compliance. The education program increased the patients' knowledge of cromolyn, and appeared to result in increased cromolyn compliance. Post-hoc analyses, however, suggested that increased compliance did not correspond to improved medical status unless the quality of management (by physician and parents) of the child's asthma was taken into account. These results suggest that inadequate management of asthma in children may be a more serious problem than patient noncompliance. This study evaluated the benefits produced by "Superstuff", a self-help program for asthmatic children aged 7-12. Forty-three children with a confirmed diagnosis of moderate to severe asthma were randomly assigned to either the totally self-administered Superstuff condition or to a nocontact Control condition. Self-report, parental, physician, and school data were collected at pre-intervention, and two, six, and twelve months post-intervention. Children receiving Superstuff reported increased asthma self-control skills, but no gains in general self-control abilities or self-esteem. Superstuff subjects also evidenced fewer interruptions of parents, greater improvement in the progression of asthma as reported by physicians (but not in the severity of the disease or intensity of average attack), and tended toward decreased school absenteeism. Superstuff did not reduce scheduled or emergency medical contacts. The demonstration of important, but modest, benefits from a low-cost, easily disseminated, self-administered intervention is discussed in the context of self-help treatment in general. A randomized control trial of a curriculum, A.C.T. (Asthma Care Training) for Kids, was conducted. Seventy-six children between the ages of 8 and 12 years, whose asthma required treatment with medications at least 25% of the days per month, were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The control group received 4 1/2 hours of lecture presentations on asthma and its management. The experimental groups (consisting of four to seven children and their parents) received five 1-hour sessions comprising "the treatment." Children and their parents were interviewed before the sessions and 3, 6, and 12 months after the completion of the experimental treatment. Use of emergency rooms and hospitals was determined by reviewing the records of these patients (all members of the Los Angeles Kaiser Permanente health care system) for the period of 1 year before and 1 year after the treatment. Results include (1) equivalent increases in knowledge and changes in beliefs in both groups, (2) significant changes in the self-reported compliance behaviors of the experimental group only, and (3) significant reductions in emergency room visits and days of hospitalization among those receiving the experimental treatment, compared with the control group. These changes represent an estimated savings of approximately $180 per child per year for those in the experimental group. Re-admissions to hospital in childhood asthma are common with studies reporting that 25% or more of children will be re-admitted within a year. There is a need for strategies to reduce re-admissions.
                A prospective randomised control study of an asthma home management training programme was performed in children aged two years or over admitted with acute asthma. Two hundred and one children were randomised at admission to either an intervention group (n = 96) which received the teaching programme or a control group (n = 105). A nurse-led teaching programme used the current attack as a model for the management of future attacks and included discussion, written information, subsequent follow up and telephone advice aimed at developing and reinforcing individualised asthma management plans. Parents were also provided with a course of oral steroids and guidance on when to start them.
                The groups were similar in degree of social deprivation, length of stay, number of previous admissions, acute asthma treatment, and asthma treatment at discharge. Subsequent re-admissions were significantly reduced in the intervention group from 25% to 8% in individual follow up periods that ranged from two to 14 months (chi 2 = 9.63; p = 0.002). This reduction was not accompanied by any increase in subsequent emergency room attendances nor, in the short term, by any increase in urgent community asthma treatment. The intervention group also showed significant reductions in day and night morbidity 3-4 weeks after admission to hospital.
                A nurse-led asthma home management training programme administered during a hospital admission can significantly reduce subsequent admissions to hospital for asthma. Acute hospitalisation may be a particularly effective time to deliver home management training. From 1988 onwards inpatient asthma training courses have been conducted in Berlin and Osnabrück. A controlled study on asthma training was carried out from 1990 to 1992 at both centres with the support of the Robert Bosch Foundation. In the first intervention group a subsequent training course of 6 months' duration was conducted with the inclusion and participation of the relevant family doctors in addition to the main training course. Scrutiny of the result was done before (T1), directly after (T2) and 12 months subsequent to the training course (T3). Improvements are seen in somatic data or cost-relevant data (emergency referral to the hospital or family physician, inpatient hospital periods, referral because of mild obstruction, days of non-attendance in school due to illness, severity of asthma, incidence of symptoms, stress endurance in sports). There is also a marked improvement in the self-assessment ability of the children and in the management of asthma, as well as a decrease in the asthma-specific feeling of anxiety. Self-reliance and independence, as well as early intervention, are improved as seen by the parents, whereas on the other hand unfavourable factors such as arguments on the proper asthma therapy are diminished. Especially with regard to confidence in controls on the state of health or disease there are significant changes that are more marked in the group subjected to subsequent training than in the group without such additional training, compared with the control group. Structured asthma training exercises a strongly positive effect on the daily management of asthma bronchiale by the families on different planes of coping with the disease. These effects are enhanced by subsequent aftercare by the family physician. Intensive care in the asthma outpatient wards alone does not sufficiently modify the factors contributing to good coping with the disease. This study was designed to answer three main questions: 1) Does asthma self-management education reduce asthma morbidity? 2) Are the two programmes "Living With Asthma" and "Open Airways" equally effective in doing so? 3) Is a shortened version of these programmes (4 weeks) as effective as the longer original programme (8 weeks)? Twelve Italian centres of paediatric bronchopneumology selected 312 children with asthma, who were stratified by disease severity, gender and age, and then randomly assigned to an Experimental group which received an educational programme or to a Comparison group, which did not. Of the 312 children selected, 209 (114 Experimental and 95 Comparison) completed the educational protocol and a 1 year follow-up. Data recorded during the last 2 months of follow-up, 10 months after the educational intervention, showed that the Experimental group required significantly fewer emergency treatments: this reduction was more evident in the more severe asthma cases. In the Experimental, but not in the Comparison group, patients with more severe asthma consumed more medications than patients with milder asthma "Open Airways" yielded, in some cases, better results than "Living with Asthma": but a type 2 error is possible. The standard and the shortened programmes proved equally effective. In conclusion, following education, regardless of receiving a short or long educational programme, asthma patients use emergency care services less and use medications more appropriately in comparison with standard care without education. This suggests that short educational programmes can be highly cost-effective in children with asthma. A randomised controlled study of an educational programme for children with asthma and their families was carried out by community child health nurses. Three hundred and sixty eight children aged 2 to 14 years were enrolled in the study after admission to hospital for asthma. The intervention group was visited monthly by a nurse for six months. The subjects were assessed six months later by a postal, self administered questionnaire. European children in the intervention group were taking significantly more drugs for the treatment of asthma six months after the index admission to hospital than those in the control group (mean (SD) intake 2.7 (1.1) v 2.1 (1.0), respectively). In particular, they were using more theophylline (56.6% v 37.0%) and inhaled steroids (34.9% v 21.0%). There was no difference between the groups for parental reports of improvement, of missed schooling, and in severe attacks of asthma of not responding to the usual treatment at home. European children in the intervention group used the hospital services for severe attacks of asthma more than controls (34.2% v 10.5%). There were more re-admissions in the European intervention group in the subsequent six months after the index admission than in the control group (mean (SD) 0.51 (0.97) v 0.29 (0.65). Re-admission continued to be higher in the 12 months after the nurse had stopped visiting (0.81 (1.65) v 0.25 (0.65]. There was no difference in the duration of hospital stay between the intervention and control groups. For Polynesian children there was no difference between the groups for any outcome measures. The Self-Care Rehabilitation in Pediatric Asthma (SCRPA) project was designed to ascertain the level to which children with asthma are able to acquire the asthma knowledge and skills presented in a self-management training program conducted by the American Lung Association of Utah and the effect of such training on the asthma experience. The preschool SCRPA Curriculum (ages 2-5) consisted of six 1-hour classes scheduled twice a week for 3 weeks. The first and last classes were for one or both parents only, and the middle four sessions were for the child and parent(s). The school-age SCRPA curriculum (ages 6-14) consisted of eight 90-minute classes for both child and parent(s) scheduled twice a week for 4 weeks. Private physicians referred 21 preschool children and 38 school-age children into the program. The school-age children were randomly assigned to a study or control group, and the preschool children served as their own controls. A comparison of asthma episodes during the 3 months before and after training showed a statistically significant decrease in the number of episodes but no change in severity in the preschool, school study, and school control groups. The decrease in episodes for the control groups suggest that the family record keeping required of all subjects may have a beneficial effect, a phenomenon worth further investigation. Also, the school-age group, in pre- and posttesting, demonstrated that the SCRPA curriculum increased knowledge and skills in the study group, changes not found in the control group. This study was conducted to test the efficacy of AIR WISE, an individually administered asthma self-management program. Subjects were paired and randomly assigned to either an experimental group (N = 7) or a control group (N = 7). The frequency of experimental group emergency visits, analyzed over a 12-month posttreatment period, was substantially less than those of the control group, supporting the hypothesis that AIR WISE is effective in high-utilizer children through improved self-management. A randomized control trial of the Wee Wheezers asthma education program was conducted with 76 children < 7 years of age, 31% of whom were on a medication regimen consistent with mild, 51% with moderate, and 18% with moderately severe/severe asthma. Treatment children showed improved morbidity at 3-month follow-up relative to the changes in the controls: increased symptom-free days in the preceding 2 weeks (mean change of +2.2 vs. -2.6 in the controls; p = .004) and month (+2.0 vs. -3.8; p < .02), fewer nights of parental sleep interruption in a typical week (+0.7 vs. +1.8; p < or = .05), and a trend toward fewer asthma sick days (-0.2 vs +0.7; p = ns). These improvements were accompanied by significantly better parental asthma management compared with controls (more consistent use of preventive medications, p < or = .01; early symptom intervention, [corrected] p < or = .05) and trends toward more restrictions on smoking in the home (p < .07) and decreased parental confusion about asthma treatment (p < .11). This study provides evidence that a multisession program of asthma education for parents can improve parental asthma management and clinical outcomes in very young children and provides information on the validity and sensitivity of various asthma outcome measures in this age group. A research project, which looks at the value of health education in the prevention of childhood asthma, is described. The project was a controlled trial by a health visitor focused within the community. This exploratory research looked at three groups of children over a 2-year period, and compared the effect of: (a) individual health education, and (b) group health education. During the first year, two groups were active, one receiving individual health education, the other collecting data of the same type. During the second year, a third group was involved in health education sessions. The findings have been similar in both cases, in that both groups have demonstrated a good improvement in knowledge of asthma and its treatment. Through the active involvement of using a peakflow meter and diary records in the health education programme, both groups receiving health education have shown a significant improvement in the morbidity indicators related to night symptoms and restricted activities. The qualitative analysis of the research also highlighted the value parents of asthmatic children place on counselling. It was hypothesized that a health education program for children with asthma aged 8-11 years that was delivered in elementary schools, would increase children's asthma management skills, self-efficacy and influence on parents' management decisions; reduce school absences and improve school performance. The study population consisted of 239 low-income, predominantly Hispanic and black children from 12 elementary schools (six experimental and six control) in New York City. Parents did not attend educational sessions but received written materials. The program emphasized the child's responsibility for recognizing symptoms and taking appropriate management steps. Follow-up data obtained one year after the program showed that compared to controls experimental group children had higher scores on an index of asthma management (p less than 0.05), greater self-efficacy with respect to asthma management skills (p less than 0.05), more influence on parents' asthma management decisions (p less than 0.05), better grades in school (p = 0.05), and fewer episodes of asthma (p less than 0.01) of shorter average duration (p less than 0.01). No differences were observed for changes in number of school absences. These findings show that asthma health education designed for delivery to children can significantly increase management skills, reduce symptoms of asthma, and improve school performance. A clinic supervised by a nurse, using principles originally developed in general practice, was established in the paediatric department of a district general hospital. A randomised controlled study was conducted comparing children admitted with asthma or attending outpatients who were given a patient education programme and self management plan (intervention group) with a control group. The study comprised 91 patients aged 3-14 years admitted for asthma or attending a hospital outpatient department from November 1989 to November 1990. Seventy seven patients completed the study and kept diaries for a median of 283 days. Patients in the intervention group had significantly less restriction of activity (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.27 to -0.01) and fewer episodes of peak flow below 30% of best (95% CI 0.03 to 1.17). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to make the correct response to an acute exacerbation of their asthma than the control group (71% v 47%, 95% CI 9.51 to 39.1). The intervention group had fewer school absences and fewer home visits by a general practitioner. There was an increase in the readmission rate for the intervention group. A subgroup of patients who self managed by doubling their use of inhaled steroids during an exacerbation performed better than those patients who only increased their bronchodilator or were managed on salbutamol or sodium cromoglycate alone. Improvements in patient follow up and the structure of the self management plans used, particularly changing the peak flow level at which inhaled steroids are doubled, may further improve the outcome of patients attending the asthma clinic. A program designed to teach self-management skills to asthmatic children and their parents was performed by a nurse-educator utilizing health education techniques. Goals included: (1) reduce frequency and severity of asthma; (2) reduce emergency room visits and hospitalizations; (3) reduce school absenteeism; (4) develop positive family self-help attitudes; and (5) incorporate patient-parent education in an office. After informed consent was obtained, 26 asthmatic children, aged 2 to 14 years, were selected and evaluated. Appropriate asthma management including avoidance, medications, and immunotherapy, if indicated, was initiated for both a study group (13 patients) and a comparison group (13 patients). Symptom and medication diaries were kept for six to 18 months. Educational intervention by a nurse-educator, including four hours of individual instruction, group classes, telephone access, and monitoring for the study patients, resulted in fewer hospitalizations and emergency room visits as compared to control patients, tenfold less school absenteeism, and fewer asthma attacks. Estimated hospital and emergency room costs were much less in the educated group. These results were accomplished by improving comprehension of and compliance with the medical management program by the study patients and their families; more medications were used and therapy for asthma was initiated earlier. We have previously reported a high prevalence of current asthma-related symptoms affecting predominantly Hispanic, socioeconomically disadvantaged schoolchildren in Southeast San Diego.
                We sought to assess the impact of a school-based education program on asthma outcomes.
                In cooperation with the San Diego Unified Schools, we developed and implemented a school-based asthma education program. Based on the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute consensus guidelines for asthma, the five-session bilingual, interactive curriculum was conducted in 20-minute segments. Asthma knowledge was tested before and after the education program, and asthma severity was prospectively assessed at monthly intervals. Outcome parameters were compared in educated and control (noneducated) fourth grade students with asthma by using nonparametric techniques.
                After asthma education, students demonstrated improvement with increases in mean scores for: asthma knowledge quiz from 9.9 (SEM = 0.44, n = 34) to 13.7 (SEM = 0.30); peak flowmeter technique from 3.9 (SEM = 0.33, n = 32) to 6.4 (SEM = 0.29); and inhaler technique from 2.3 (SEM = 0.26, n = 32) to 4.3 (SEM = 0.26). All changes were highly significant (p < or = 0.00001 as determined by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test). Mean score comparisons for asthmatic control students given paired examinations after a time interval matched with the educated students, did not reach statistical significance: quiz score of 11.3 (SEM = 0.80, n = 11) versus 10.9 (SEM = 0.68), peak flowmeter technique score of 2.6 (SEM = 0.50, n = 18) versus 3.1 (SEM = 0.37) , and inhaler technique score of 2.5 (SEM = 0.37, n = 18) versus 2.2 (SEM = 0.31). Prospective monthly data were collected on 27 educated and 15 control asthmatic subjects. Severity of asthma was not significantly different between groups at entry to the study. Symptom questionnaires, validated for functional asthma severity, revealed a significant reduction in mean symptom scores at 180 days for the educated (2.87, SEM = 0.447) versus the control (4.36, SEM = 0.573) groups (p = 0.0188 as determined by the Mann-Whitney U test).
                Child-centered asthma education can be successfully conducted in the school setting, resulting in increased asthma knowledge, improved skills for peak flowmeter and inhaler use, and a reduction in the severity of asthma symptoms. A randomized trial of an instructional method was conducted in which school nurses taught children asthma self-management principles and skills, including peak flow monitoring, in 20-min, individual sessions over an 8-week period. Thirty-six children participated. An intervention group of 18 children received the teaching sessions. A control group of 18 children received regular care by the nurses, but no teaching sessions. The sample included 64% boys, 69% African-Americans, and 69% Medicaid recipients. The average age of subjects was 10.2 years. The two groups were demographically similar, but despite random assignment, the control group had a significantly earlier age of onset of asthma and tended to have had more asthma attacks in the preceding year. These factors were statistically controlled in outcome analyses. Results of group comparisons showed no significant differences in the number of postintervention emergency room visits and days absent from school. However, nurses reported that children who practiced breathing exercises had less anxiety during exacerbations, and the nurses' knowledge of the children's baseline peak expiratory flow rates facilitated care of the children. Nurses expressed the opinion that the individual sessions with students might be useful in motivating them to participate effectively in later group sessions. The intervention was well accepted by students, parents, and nurses. We believe that this intervention is promising as a practical, low-cost approach to enhancing children's asthma self-management skills and warrants further testing in a larger sample, with the intervention conducted over a longer period. An educational training program for children with asthma, aged between 8 and 13 years, was evaluated in an 18-month randomized, controlled experiment, including three follow-up evaluations. The objective of the program is to improve coping with asthma in daily life. The program, ten 1-hour sessions, is a combination of self-management training and cognitive behaviour therapy in a group, using games and learning materials specifically designed for this age group. From 195 asthmatic children, 112 with inadequate self-management abilities were selected; these children were randomly divided into an experimental group and two control groups. The results indicated highly significant differences in favor of the experimental group on the psychological and medical variables. There were no drop-outs during the program. The conclusion is that this multi-faceted program is an effective method of teaching children how to cope with their asthma and helping them to achieve a less anxious and more realistic attitude towards their illness. nan To affect asthma-related knowledge, behavior, and morbidity, researchers tested a new educational intervention for children with asthma: an asthma-specific computer game called Asthma Command, which was specifically designed for this study. Sixty-five children with moderately severe asthma were randomly assigned to one of two groups, and 54 completed the study. Both groups were seen approximately six times during the 1 year of the study. Control subjects (n = 29) played routine computer games. Experimental subjects (n = 25) played Asthma Command. Compared with children in the control group, experimental subjects showed improvement in knowledge about asthma (P less than .001), behavior related to the management of asthma (P less than .008), and a trend toward the reduction of acute visits due to asthma (P less than .13). Children in the experimental group also scored higher on the assessment of behaviors related to the management of asthma that were specifically addressed by the intervention provided by Asthma Command (P less than .01). Differences between the control and experimental groups showed a greater improvement in the experimental group in 21 (84%) of the 25 outcome variables in the study (P = .004, Sign test). The study indicates that an asthma-specific computer game can significantly affect knowledge and behavior and may potentially affect morbidity in childhood asthma. Twenty children with severe asthma using continual oral beta 2 agonists were randomized equally into either a behavioral intervention group or a control group. The behavioral intervention consisted of: symptom discrimination of asthma signals, self-management techniques of breathlessness, and contingency management of asthma-related behavior. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the behavioral treatment when superimposed on a regular medical treatment. The design consisted of a four-week baseline period, a four-week intervention period, and a four-week follow-up period. Results showed that the group receiving the behavioral intervention significantly reduced their use of beta 2 agonist spray doses and days of school absenteeism without increasing the number of asthma symptoms compared with the control group. It was concluded that children with severe asthma may benefit substantially from a behavioral program in addition to their regular medical treatment. A small, controlled trial of joint treatment of childhood asthma by a doctor, a physiotherapist, a psychologist, and a social worker, working together in the family setting, demonstrated an improvement in ventilatory capacity. The limited scope of this trial does not permit more general conclusions as to the effect of such treatment on the severity and frequency of attacks, but the observation that some measurable physiological improvement occurred suggests that the place of multidisciplinary nonpharmaceutical management of childhood asthma should be investigated in more detail. The care of asthmatic children is commonly sub-optimal. Accordingly the costs and benefits of sending a district health authority community nurse, who had specific training in asthma management, into the homes of 43 families with asthmatic children were assessed. During the six months the asthma nurse visited these homes, the children developed and sustained, higher peak expiratory flow rates than 43 control asthmatics. The direct costs of the asthma nurse was 15 pounds/patient/six months. An educational program for children with asthma designed to reduce emergency room (ER) use enrolled all eligible children (n = 253 primarily low-income Black) within a health maintenance organization (HMO) who had used the hospital or ER for asthma during the pre-enrollment period and randomized them into two groups. Twenty-four of the experimental group patients had 55 ER visits and 18 of the control patients had 39 ER visits during the first 12 months post-intervention. This program did not achieve its goal. A school-based health education program was conducted for children with asthma. Fifty-three children with asthma participated in the educational program and 51 children who did not participate during the 1st year served as a "comparison group." The program was administered to the "comparison group" during the 2nd year to replicate observed changes. The educational program improved knowledge, increased the child's perception of having more control over his/her health and reduced anxiety associated with illness. Results indicate that educational objectives for children with asthma can be met through a structured educational program, conducted in small groups. To assess the effect of a community-based management program, incorporating both education and treatment directed at children, parents, doctors, pharmacists, community nurses and school teachers.
                The effect of this intervention in a population sample of 65 children with a wide range of morbidity due to asthma was compared with a control group of 55 children living in a different area. Both groups were re-evaluated concurrently after three and six months.
                Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); bronchial responsiveness to histamine measured as the provoking dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20FEV1) and as dose-response ratio (DRR); Airflometer variability; symptom frequency; and knowledge of asthma. Morbidity was measured by parents using a self-administered questionnaire and included days absent from school and unscheduled doctor or emergency room visits.
                At three months, the intervention group had a significant improvement in knowledge of asthma compared with both their baseline and the control group's change in knowledge. Also, FEV1 improved in this group and symptoms which limit activity decreased significantly. However, the largest improvements were recorded at the six-month follow up. In the intervention group, bronchial responsiveness and night cough were reduced significantly and FEV1 was improved, compared with both baseline measurements and the control group. Knowledge of asthma also improved significantly from baseline, and unscheduled doctor or emergency room visits were reduced.
                These improvements in this group of children, many of whom had mild asthma, verify that community-based management programs can be effective in treating childhood asthma. Care of asthmatic children is often episodic and more therapeutic than preventive. A 2-year randomized, controlled trial involving 95 children measured the impact of a comprehensive home and ambulatory program for pediatric asthma management using objective outcome measures. Interventions for the study group during the first year included 3-month clinic visits, education, and home visits by a specially trained research nurse. Control subjects continued to receive regular care from a family physician or pediatrician. Eight-nine subjects (93%) completed the study. Study subjects had less school absenteeism than control subjects (10.7 vs. 16.0 days, P = .04) and showed significantly better small airway function after 1 year. Asthma severity improved in 13 study subjects and worsened in 5. The reverse was true for control subjects. Study subjects exhibited better metered aerosol technique than control subjects (P = .0005). Fewer days were spent in hospital by the study subjects admitted compared with control subjects (3.67 vs 11.2 days, P = .02). After 1 year, more study than control families (72.1% vs 33.1%, P = .006) reported that their asthmatic child took responsibility for the asthma management. The intervention failed to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke or to household pets. There were no significant differences in medical visits, theophylline levels, or records of asthma symptoms. One year after discontinuing the intervention, a marked "washout" effect was observed. Comprehensive ambulatory programs of childhood asthma management can improve objective measures of illness severity but must be sustained. nan
Asthma self-management education programs in children improve a wide range of measures of outcome. Self-management education directed to prevention and management of attacks should be incorporated into routine asthma care. Conclusions about the relative effectiveness of the various components are limited by the lack of direct comparisons. Future trials of asthma education programs should focus on morbidity and functional status outcomes, including quality of life, and involve direct comparisons of the various components of interventions.