Early intervention for low birthweight, premature infants: participation and intellectual development. Type of day-care and preschool intellectual development in disadvantaged children.
The Infant Health and Development Program was an eight-site randomized controlled trial of comprehensive early intervention for low birthweight, premature infants during the first 3 years of life in which intellectual development was an outcome of major importance. At 24 and 36 months, but not at 12 months, higher Mental Development Index and IQ were associated with higher levels of participation in the intervention. In a longitudinal analysis of these data, we found that the intellectual development of children in the intervention group was associated with each of the three intervention modalities (the number of home visits received, days attended at child centers, and the number of parent meetings attended) but not with children's background characteristics (i.e., maternal education, birthweight). We suggest that these findings represent a dose-response relation between intervention and outcome. Levels and patterns of intellectual development of 3 groups of socioeconomically disadvantaged children were compared. The groups consisted of (1) children who were randomly assigned to receive extensive university-based intervention group day-care, (2) children whose parents placed them in community day-care centers for varying amounts of time, or (3) children whose parents chose little to no center-based day-care for their children. Two repeated-measures analyses of variance were performed to identify possible day-care effects on IQ level and on patterns of infant and preschool cognitive development. The results suggest that quality community day-care, as well as intervention day-care, may positively change both the level and pattern of preschool intellectual development of socioeconomically disadvantaged children.
Day care has beneficial effect on children's development, school success and adult life patterns. To date, all randomised trials have been conducted among disadvantaged populations in the USA. The extent to which the results are generaliseable to other cultures and socioeconomic groups has yet to be evaluated.