Prospective randomized study of D-Trp6-LHRH versus buserelin in long desensitization protocols for medically assisted conception cycles. A comparison of three gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a prospective randomized study. Should gonadotropin-releasing hormone down-regulation therapy be routine in in vitro fertilization? The long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues impaired the implantation rate. Effect of reduced dose of triptorelin at the start of ovarian stimulation on the outcome of IVF: a randomized study. Clinical outcome with half-dose depot triptorelin is the same as reduced-dose daily buserelin in a long protocol of controlled ovarian stimulation for ICSI/embryo transfer: a randomized double-blind clinical trial (NCT00461916). Single-dose depot leuprolide is as efficient as daily short-acting leuprolide in ICSI cycles. Subcutaneous goserelin versus intranasal buserelin for pituitary down-regulation in patients undergoing IVF: a randomized comparative study. Effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists on human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo and in vitro-results of a prospective, randomized in-vitro fertilization study. Subcutaneous low dose leuprolide acetate depot versus leuprolide acetate for women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization. [Can the type of GnRH used during long in vitro fertilization protocols influence the pregnancy rate?]. Comparison between depot leuprorelin and daily buserelin in IVF. Comparison between depot and standard release triptoreline in in vitro fertilization: pituitary sensitivity, luteal function, pregnancy outcome, and perinatal results. Comparisons of different dosages of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, short-acting form and single, half-dose, long-acting form of GnRH agonist during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and in vitro fertilization. Half-dose, long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Diphereline) is comparable with daily injections of short-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Suprefact) in IVF/ICSI cycles.
In a prospective, controlled, randomized study where two different agonists were used, we compared three different long desensitization protocols for induction of multiple follicular growth in medically assisted conception cycles. In protocol A, 30 patients were injected with buserelin twice a day for 15 days prior to ovarian stimulation until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. In protocol B, 30 patients were injected with a single dose of long acting Triptorelin (3.75 mg) 15 days before the ovarian stimulation onset. In protocol C, 30 patients were injected with the long acting Triptorelin 4 weeks before ovarian stimulation followed by daily administration of 0.1 mg of the same agonist until HCG injection. There was no difference in the ovarian response to exogenous gonadotrophin stimulation, except for the presence of premature luteinization in two patients in group B. A significantly higher number of mature oocytes was collected from patients with protocol A; however, the fertilization and cleavage rate demonstrated no significant difference among the three groups of patients. The ongoing pregnancy rate and the implantation rate per treatment cycle were very similar in the three study groups. When the convenience, cost and side-effects for the patient are being considered, protocol B should be selected as the first choice when the agonist is utilized for the purpose of inducing pituitary desensitization before and during ovarian stimulation. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) has resulted in improved pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment cycles. Traditionally, short-acting analogues have been employed because of concerns over long-acting depot preparations causing profound suppression and luteal phase defects adversely affecting pregnancy and miscarriage rates. We randomized 60 IVF patients to receive a short-acting GnRHa, nafarelin or buserelin, or to receive a depot formulation, leuprorelin, all commenced in the early follicular phase and compared their effects on hormonal suppression and clinical outcome. We found that on day 15 of administration there was a significant difference in the suppression of oestradiol from initial concentrations, when patients on buserelin were compared with patients on nafarelin or leuprorelin (54 versus 72 and 65%; P < 0.05) and also in the number of patients satisfactorily suppressed, (80 versus 90 and 90%; P < 0.05), though there were no differences between the analogues by day 21. Similarly there was no difference in hormonal suppression during the stimulation phase or in implantation, pregnancy or miscarriage rates in comparing the three agonists. We conclude that with nafarelin and leuprorelin, stimulation with gonadotrophins may begin after 2 weeks of suppression and that long-acting GnRHa are as effective as short-acting analogues with no detrimental effects on the luteal phase. To compare the classic clomiphene citrate (CC) and hMG regime for ovarian stimulation before IVF in women who received hMG post-long protocol down-regulation with either 3 mg triptorelin [INN] IM or 150 mg buserelin acetate four times daily intranasally. Furthermore, if possible, to determine the preferred method of down-regulation.
                A prospective study of 150 women randomized blind to the clinician to one of three alternative ovarian stimulation regimes when passing for the first time through an IVF program during 1992.
                Triptorelin [INN] down-regulated significantly more quickly than buserelin acetate. The non-down-regulated group CC and hMG used significantly less hMG in a shorter time. In these women LH levels at hCG administration were significantly higher. No other intergroup differences were found. Pregnancy and take-home baby rates for the overall study were, respectively, 32%:25% (per cycle) and 42%:33%; (per ET) for the triptorelin [INN] group 28%:22% and 39%:31%; the CC group 32%:24% and 46%:34%; and the buserelin acetate group 34%:28% and 42%:34%.
                Triptorelin [INN] and buserelin acetate were comparable in all parameters except down-regulation. The former was significantly quicker and more sure. In none of the clinical end points measured, however, was the classic CC and hMG non-down-regulation regime significantly less effective or troublesome than where down-regulation was used. These results therefore show that although indications for down-regulation before IVF exist, it should not be used on all patients. To determine the efficacy and innocuousness of long-acting versus short-acting GnRH analogues (GnRH-a) in long protocol for in IVF-ET.
                Prospective randomized study.
                The IVF unit at an academic hospital.
                One hundred couples admitted for their first IVF-ET attempt.
                Serum concentrations of LH, E2, and P during the all cycles and duration of pituitary desensitization were assessed, as well as fertilization rate, embryo quality, and implantation and pregnancy rates.
                Significantly more days (10.8 +/- 1.8 versus 9.2 +/- 1.7 days) of stimulation and more ampules of hMG (47 +/- 22 versus 33 +/- 16) were necessary to obtain similar numbers of embryos of quality with the long-acting GnRH-a. Implantation and delivery rates were significantly lower with the long-acting GnRH-a (32.8% versus 21.1%; 48.9% versus 29.1%, respectively).
                As the long-acting GnRH-a might interfere with the luteal phase and embryo development, short-acting GnRH-a should be preferred for ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF-ET. Partial pituitary desensitization using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be sufficient in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproduction. However, the minimal effective agonist dose remains to be determined. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of a reduced daily dose of triptorelin, administered at the start of ovarian stimulation, on the results of IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
                A total of 132 patients was randomized in two groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (66 patients) with a single 3.75 mg injection (i.m.) of triptorelin. In group 2, 66 patients received 100 microg triptorelin daily, which was then reduced to 50 microg at the start of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) stimulation.
                No significant differences were found in terms of pregnancy rate per transfer (38% in group 1 versus 34.9% in group 2), implantation rate (20.2 versus 18%) and abortion rate (8.3 versus 9.1%). The number of FSH ampoules used, as well as the number of days stimulation required, was significantly reduced in group 2 (41 +/- 26 versus 46.6 +/- 25.3, P < 0.03 and 11 +/- 1.3 versus 11.8 +/- 1.5, P < 0.002 respectively). No significant differences were seen in oestradiol concentrations and in follicle number, in the quantity of oocytes collected and fertilized, or in the number of embryos obtained or transferred.
                A reduced dose of triptorelin is enough for pituitary suppression during ovarian stimulation but provides no significant improvement in IVF cycle outcome when compared with depot formulation. The possibility of a shorter treatment protocol requiring lower amounts of gonadotrophins should be considered in view of its economic advantage. Traditional doses of depot GnRH agonist may be excessive for ovarian stimulation. We compared half-dose depot triptorelin (Group I) with reduced-dose daily buserelin (Group II) in a long protocol ICSI/embryo transfer through a double-blind randomized clinical trial.
                Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) was started by a pretreatment with oral contraceptives for 21 days. Then, 182 patients were randomized into two groups of 91. Group I received 1.87 mg triptorelin depot i.m. followed by daily s.c. injections of saline. Group II (reduced-dose protocol) received a bolus injection of i.m. saline followed by daily s.c. injections of 0.5 mg buserelin, which was then reduced to 0.25 mg at the start of human menopausal gonadotrophin stimulation. When transvaginal ultrasound showed at least two follicles of 16-20 mm diameter, HCG was given and ICSI was performed 40-42 h later.
                No significant differences were seen in the mean (SD) number of follicles at HCG administration, as our primary outcome [10.3 (4.4) in Group I versus 11.1 (4.2) in Group II, P = 0.180, mean difference = 0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.39-2.11]. The other early results of COS, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, or early pregnancy loss were also not significantly different between the groups. Group I endured longer stimulation period [11.2 (1.8) days versus 10.6 (1.9), P = 0.030].
                Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between Group I and Group II. In this prospective randomized study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of a single depot (1.88 mg) reduced dose with a daily low dose (0.5 mg/day) of leuprolide for pituitary suppression as part of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) in an ICSI program.
                The study population consisted of 103 patients randomized into two groups. Group 1 (n = 52) consisted of patients who had daily low-dose leuprolide injections. Group 2 (n = 51) consisted of patients who had the 1.88 mg single-dose leuprolide injection.
                The age of the patients, the number of metaphase II oocytes, the number and quality of embryos transferred were similar between the two groups. Although the length of gonadotrophin stimulation was significantly longer in group 2 (P < 0.01), the amount of gonadotrophins used was similar (P = 0.34). Leuprolide levels were significantly lower in group 2 within the first 8 h after injection (P < 0.05), but no difference was observed thereafter. Although LH levels on the day of hCG (P = 0.06) administration and estradiol levels on day 3 (P < 0.01) were lower in group 2, LH levels and progesterone levels 1 week after embryo transfer did not show any statistically significant difference. Clinical pregnancy rates per embryo transfer, implantation rates and first trimester abortion rates were also similar for both groups.
                A single reduced depot dose (1.88 mg) of leuprolide was found to be as effective as classical long multi-dose protocol for pituitary desensitization in COH for ICSI cycles. One-hundred women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in this randomized comparative study. The effectiveness of long-acting s.c. goserelin (Zoladex depot; 49 patients) and intranasally (i.n.) administered buserelin acetate (Suprefact; 51 patients) for pituitary down-regulation was compared. Treatment with s.c. goserelin (3.6 mg) or i.n. buserelin acetate (200 micrograms; 6 times/day) was started on day 21-23 of the cycle. Stimulation with 150 IU of HMG/day was started after at least 11 days of GnRH-a treatment. There were no differences in the time required for follicular development nor in the clinical outcome between groups treated with either goserelin or buserelin. The number of oocytes recovered in the goserelin group was 6.7 +/- 5.0 versus 6.3 +/- 4.9 in the buserelin group. There were 11 pregnancies after the use of goserelin (22.4%) and 12 pregnancies in those given buserelin (24.0%). The number of HMG ampoules needed for follicular maturation was higher in the goserelin group (27.9 +/- 7.8) than in the buserelin group (24.6 +/- 7.8, P < 0.05). The patients given buserelin suffered significantly more from tiredness, depression, headache and abdominal pain than those receiving goserelin, whereas there were no differences between the groups in experiencing mental irritability, nausea and swelling. Subcutaneous goserelin depot injection offers a useful alternative for pituitary down-regulation in IVF stimulation. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the effects of two gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, buserelin and triptorelin, on human ovarian follicular steroidogenesis, oocyte fertilization and IVF treatment outcome. Ovulatory, healthy women undergoing IVF were treated either with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) alone or with HMG and one of the two GnRH agonists. Serum and follicular fluid hormonal concentrations and cultures of luteinizing granulosa cells obtained during follicular aspiration were analysed. GnRH agonist treatment significantly affected steroidogenesis both in serum and follicular fluid. In follicular fluid, progesterone and oestradiol concentrations were significantly elevated while testosterone concentrations were significantly lower in the triptorelin group. The ratios of testosterone/progesterone, oestradiol/progesterone but not oestradiol/testosterone concentrations were significantly affected by GnRH agonist administration. Similarly, the steroidogenic activity of luteinizing granulosa cells in vitro was significantly decreased in women treated with GnRH agonists. Women treated with GnRH agonists had significantly more fertilized oocytes and cleaving embryos. The results indicate a marked effect of GnRH agonists on the pattern of ovarian follicular steroidogenesis that cannot be explained solely by changes in gonadotrophin concentrations. A total of 100 women undergoing ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and a human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) participated in this randomized comparative study. Leuprolide acetate at a dose of 0.5 mg/day s.c. (n = 52, group I), or low-dose leuprolide acetate depot at a dose of 1.88 mg s.c. (n = 48, group II), was started on days 21-23 of the cycle. Stimulation with 225 IU/day HMG was started after pituitary desensitization had been achieved. The luteal phase was supported by human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) i.m. injection. There were no statistical differences in baseline oestradiol (24.5 +/- 4.8 versus 21.9 +/- 4.5 pg/ml) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations (3.9 +/- 1.9 versus 3.2 +/- 1.8 mIU/ml), and concentrations on the day of HCG administration of oestradiol (1657 +/- 245 versus 1512 +/- 165 pg/ml), luteinizing hormone (LH; 6.2 +/- 4.8 versus 5.6 +/- 4.3 mIU/ml) and FSH (10.6 +/- 2.8 versus 10.8 +/- 3.6 mIU/ml). There were also no statistical differences in the HMG dosage (26.8 +/- 1.8 versus 28.5 +/- 1.5), the number of oocytes retrieved (7.6 +/- 3.0 versus 8.1 +/- 4.3), the number of oocytes fertilized (5.3 +/- 2.1 versus 5.6 +/- 3.0) and the number of embryos transferred (3.5 +/- 1.3 versus 3.4 +/- 1.6). There was no evidence of a premature LH surge in either group, but two patients appeared to have a poor response in the leuprolide acetate group (group I). There were 11 pregnancies (21.2%) after the use of leuprolide acetate and 12 pregnancies (25.0%) in those given leuprolide acetate depot; no statistical difference existed between these two groups. Thus, a s.c. low-dose leuprolide acetate depot injection may offer a useful alternative for pituitary suppression in ovarian stimulation for IVF. Luteal defect is common during IVF cycles using GnRH agonist. It could be interesting to make up for this problem by using short acting GnRH agonist (effective for 24 hours), more handy at the end of the stimulation. 160 patients included in a long IVF protocol at the Bordeaux CHRU FIV center have been randomized, from September 1993 to August 1994, for the analog's choice (long or short) at the beginning of the stimulation. The stimulation's parameters, the hormonal dosages and the pregnancy rate are independent of the galenic form used. In close, the use of long-acting GnRH analog (sympler to use) sems preferable. To compare the effects of depot and daily forms of GnRH analogs in IVF programs.
                One hundred seventeen patients undergoing IVF, with no severe male factor, were randomized between two treatment groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (60 patients) with a single IM injection of leuprorelin (3.75 mg), and in group 2 (57 patients) with buserelin (0.3 mg SC twice daily). In a subgroup of 10 patients (5 for the depot form and 5 for the daily form) several GnRH tests were performed to investigate pituitary desensitization.
                No differences were found in the time to reach desensitization. Resumption of pituitary activity occurred in 7 days with the daily form and in about 2 months with the depot form. No significant differences were found in the stimulation pattern, oocyte quality, percentage of fertilization. The pregnancy rate per transfer was slightly, but not significantly, better in the depot group (29.4% vs 25.9%). Implantation rate (11.9% vs 12.3%) and the percentage of miscarriages (26.6% vs 28.5%) were similar.
                Depot and daily forms of GnRH analogs are equally effective in superovulation induction for IVF. Considering improved patient compliance and preference, depot forms are advantageous. To compare the effects of depot and standard release form of triptoreline in superovulation induction in IVF programs.
                One hundred ninety-six patients undergoing IVF were randomized between two treatment groups. Pituitary desensitization was obtained in group 1 (102 patients) with a single IM injection of 3.75 mg D-Trp-6-luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) and, in group 2 (94 patients), with daily SC administration of 0.1 mg D-Trp-6-LH-RH. In a subgroup of 11 patients, a series of GnRH tests was performed to investigate pituitary desensitization and, in another subgroup of 12 patients, a study of luteal phase steroid profile was performed. In an additional 23 patients, a series of GnRH tests were performed to investigate pituitary desensitization during the late follicular and midluteal phases.
                No differences were found in the time necessary to reach desensitization (11.3 +/- 1.03 versus 11.3 +/- 1.45 days; mean +/- SEM), whereas resumption of pituitary activity takes place in 7 days after the discontinuation of the daily form and in about 2 months after discontinuation of the depot form. No differences were found in the duration of stimulation, number of FSH ampules, E2 levels, and number of follicles (11.7 +/- 0.68, versus 12.2 +/- 0.68) on hCG administration day and the total oocytes collected (9.1 +/- 0.6 versus 9.2 +/- 0.64). Oocyte quality, percentage of fertilization and cleavage, pregnancy rate per transfer (28.7% versus 25.6%), and miscarriages (about 30%) were similar in the two protocols. No difference was found in hormonal levels during the luteal phase. In both groups there was a high incidence of multiple pregnancy.
                Comparable results can be achieved with both long-acting and standard-release forms of GnRH analogs in patients undergoing assisted reproduction in terms of follicular stimulation and abortion rates despite differences in the duration of pituitary suppression. Both gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogs and antagonists have been used for pituitary desensitization during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). We aimed to determine the minimum effective daily dose of GnRH antagonist in women undergoing COH. We also compared the efficiency of a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist.
                Women undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer were divided into five groups: (1) cetrorelix 0.25 mg ( n = 86); (2) cetrorelix 0.2 mg ( n = 28); (3) cetrorelix 0.15 mg ( n = 30); (4) leuprolide acetate (LA) 0.5 mg/day ( n = 58); (5) single half-dose LA depot 1.88 mg ( n = 49). Cetrorelix was administered daily from menstrual day 8 until the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration. LA or LA depot was started on day 21 of the previous menstrual cycle.
                We observed lower gonadotropin (Gn) dosages, estradiol (E2) levels and reduced risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in the GnRH antagonist groups. A higher risk of luteinizing hormone (LH) surge was noted in cetrorelix 0.2 and 0.15 mg groups. Gn dosages (IU)/E2 levels (pg/mL) in each group were: (1) 1,949.4/1,191.1; (2) 1,869.6/1,010.8; (3) 1,856.7/1,023.6; (4) 2,184.5/1,323.6; and (5) 2,103.5/1,313.5, respectively. LH/OHSS risks were: (1) 3.5%/5.8%; (2) 7.1%/3.6%; (3) 13.3%/3.3%; (4) 3.4%/8.6%; and (5) 2%/8.2%, respectively. Number of oocytes/embryos/grade I, II embryos were: (1) 9.4/7.9/5.8; (2) 7.5/4.2/3.6; (3) 6.3/4.1/3.1; (4) 12.3/8.9/6.6; and (5) 11.8/8.4/6.1, respectively. There was no significant difference in terms of clinical outcomes between groups 1, 4 and 5, except for higher abortion rates (AR) in group 1. Pregnancy rate (PR)/implantation rate (IR) ratios in groups 1, 4, and 5 were statistically higher than those in groups 2 and 3. Chemical PR/IR/AR were: (1) 30.2%/5.9%/7%; (2) 21.4%/5.1%/7.1%; (3) 16.7%/4.1%/10%; (4) 32.8%/5.5%/8.6%; and (5) 30.6%/5.7%/8.2%, respectively.
                The lowest effective dosage of cetrorelix for pituitary desensitization during COH luteolysis is 0.25 mg, resulting in a comparable PR but a higher AR when compared with GnRH agonist. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of half-dose, long-acting GnRH analogue (Diphereline) with Suprefact in IVF/ICSI (in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection) cycles.
                In this randomized clinical trial performed in Royan Institute, 126 infertile women who were first time candidates for IVF/ICSI were enrolled. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by using a random number table. In one group, 62 patients received a single half dose, 1.87 mg Diphereline, in mid-luteal phase. In the other group, 64 cases were treated with buserelin from the previous mid-luteal phase. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant.
                The mean age of patients in the Diphereline and Suprefact groups was 27.9 ±3.6 and 29.6 ±3.5 years, respectively (p = 0.01). In the Diphereline group, the mean number of used gonadotropins was 25.6 ±12.1 ampoules, while in the second group it was 25.9 ±8.5 ampoules. Numbers of retrieved and MII oocytes were significantly higher in the Diphereline group (12.1 ±6.3 and 9.6 ±5.5) in comparison to the Suprefact group (9.4 ±6.4 and 7.2 ±5.1). Although the number of developed embryos in the Diphereline group was statistically higher than in the Suprefact group (6.1 ±3.9 vs. 4.7 ±3.4, p = 0.04) there was no significant difference in pregnancy rate (37.1%, 95% CI [26.16-49.54] vs. 37.5%, 95% CI [26.67-49.75]).
                A half-dose, long-acting GnRH agonist can be successfully used in ovarian stimulation and produces a higher number of MII oocytes and embryos. The pregnancy rates with this method are acceptable.
We found no evidence of a significant difference between depot and daily GnRHa use for pituitary down regulation in IVF cycles using the long protocol, but substantial differences could not be ruled out. Since depot GnRHa requires more gonadotrophins and a longer duration of use, it may increase the overall costs of IVF treatment.