Bone cement for redislocated Colles' fracture. A prospective comparison with closed treatment. Norian SRS cement compared with conventional fixation in distal radial fractures. A randomized study. Norian SRS versus functional treatment in redisplaced distal radial fractures: a randomized study in 20 patients. Primary bone grafting does not improve the results in severely displaced distal radius fractures. External skeletal fixation versus cement fixation in the treatment of redislocated Colles' fracture. Controlled trial of distal radial fractures treated with a resorbable bone mineral substitute. Treatment of fractures of the distal radius with a remodellable bone cement: a prospective, randomised study using Norian SRS. Norian SRS versus external fixation in redisplaced distal radial fractures. A randomized study in 40 patients. Redisplaced unstable fractures of the distal radius: a prospective randomised comparison of four methods of treatment. Cancellous allograft versus autologous bone grafting for repair of comminuted distal radius fractures: a prospective, randomized trial.
Colles' fractures (not comminuted or intraarticular) that redislocated after two closed reductions were randomized into two groups. In one group the dorsal bone deficiency was filled with bone cement (methylmethacrylate) at operation; in the other, the fractures were rereduced and immobilized in a plaster cast. All the patients were followed for 2 years and examined with respect to anatomy of the fracture, wrist movement, strength, appearance, pain, and function. The operated on group were better with regard to all objectively measurable characteristics; all operated on fractures had healed radiographically, and the cement was surrounded by cortical bone. A prospective, randomized multicenter study was conducted to evaluate closed reduction and immobilization with and without Norian SRS (Skeletal Repair System) cement in the management of distal radial fractures. Norian SRS is a calcium-phosphate bone cement that is injectable, hardens in situ, and cures by a crystallization reaction to form dahllite, a carbonated apatite equivalent to bone mineral.
                A total of 323 patients with a distal radial fracture were randomized to treatment with or without Norian SRS cement. Stratification factors included fracture type (intra-articular or extra-articular), hand dominance, bone density, and the surgeon's preferred conventional treatment (cast or external fixator). The subjects receiving Norian SRS underwent a closed reduction followed by injection of the cement percutaneously or through a limited open approach. Wrist motion, beginning two weeks postoperatively, was encouraged. Control subjects, who had not received a Norian SRS injection, underwent closed reduction and application of a cast or external fixator for six to eight weeks. Supplemental Kirschner wires were used in specific instances in both groups. Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at one, two, four, and between six and eight weeks and at three, six, and twelve months. Patients rated pain and the function of the hand with use of a visual analog scale. Quality of life was assessed with use of the Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status questionnaire. Complications were recorded.
                Significant clinical differences were seen at six to eight weeks postoperatively, with better grip strength, wrist range of motion, digital motion, use of the hand, and social and emotional function, and less swelling in the patients treated with Norian SRS than in the control group (p < 0.05). By three months, these differences had normalized except for digital motion, which remained significantly better in the group treated with Norian SRS (p = 0.015). At one year, no clinical differences were detected. Radiographically, the average change in ulnar variance was greater in the patients treated with Norian SRS (+2.0 mm) than in the control group (+1.4 mm) (p < 0.02). No differences were seen in the total number of complications, including loss of reduction. The infection rate, however, was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the control group (16.7%) than in the group treated with Norian SRS (2.5%) and the infections were always related to external fixator pins or Kirschner wires. Four patients with intra-articular extravasation of cement were identified; no sequelae were observed at twenty-four months. Cement was seen in extraosseous locations in 112 (70%) of the SRS-treated patients; loss of reduction was highest in this subgroup (37%). The extraosseous material had disappeared in eighty-three of the 112 patients by twelve months.
                Our results indicate that fixation of a distal radial fracture with Norian SRS cement may allow for accelerated rehabilitation. A limited open approach and supplemental fixation with Kirschner wires are recommended. Additional or alternate fixation is necessary for complex articular fractures. We compared the use of Norian SRS, an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement, with functional treatment of redisplaced distal radial fractures in a prospective randomized study of 20 patients. The redisplaced fractures were either rereduced and stabilized by Norian SRS, or the displaced position was accepted and was not rereduced. All wrists were immobilized in a short-arm dorsal splint for 1 week, followed by a removable splint for another 3 weeks. The chosen primary effect variable was grip strength at 7 weeks, and this did not differ between the two treatment groups. The clinical results at 6 months in both groups were similar. We conclude that aggressive treatment of redisplaced fractures of the distal radius may be unnecessary in most women aged 50 years or more. We prospectively randomised 45 patients ages 20-70 years with distal radius fractures of Older type III and IV to one of two treatment groups. One group was treated with closed reduction, primary bone grafting, and external fixation for 3 weeks, followed by a plaster cast that allowed volar flexion, for an additional 3 weeks. The other group was treated with closed reduction and external fixation for 6 weeks. The functional and radiographic results were evaluated. There was no difference between the two groups in either clinical or radiographic outcome. We do not recommend external fixation and primary bone grafting as a routine method in these fractures. In a prospective investigation in 1984 and 1985, all Colles' fractures (not comminuted or intraarticular) that redisplaced after two closed reductions were allocated at random to one of two groups: Group I (n = 23), in which the dorsal bone deficiency was filled with bone cement (methylmethacrylate), and Group II (n = 25), in which the fracture was treated with external fixation. All were followed for one year and examined with respect to anatomy of the fracture, wrist movement, strength, appearance, pain, function, and complications. Roentgenograms, 12 months after treatment, showed that all fractures had healed and that the cement was enveloped in cortical bone. The final results were equal in the two groups, but Group I improved earlier and had no complications. This randomized trial compared the use of hydroxyapatite cement with Kapandji wiring in distal radial fractures. Two groups of nine patients with distal radial fractures were either treated by reduction and fixation with wires or insertion of the cement into the fracture void. There was no difference between the groups before operation, on reduction or at day 1. Dorsal angle in the hydroxyapatite group was significantly worse at 6, 12 and 26 weeks. Grip strength and palmar flexion were poor in the hydroxyapatite cement group. All the clinical parameters and X-ray variables were worse at 12 and 26 weeks in the hydroxyapatite cement group. We conclude from this trial that there is nothing to support the use of this hydroxyapatite cement, without the use of additional fixation, in distal radial fractures.
                Copyright 2001 The British Society for Surgery of the Hand. We performed a prospective, randomised study on 110 patients more than 50 years old with fractures of the distal radius to compare the outcome of conservative treatment with that using remodellable bone cement (Norian skeletal repair system, SRS) and immobilisation in a cast for two weeks. Patients treated with SRS had less pain and earlier restoration of movement and grip strength. The results at one year were satisfactory in 81.54% of the SRS patients and 55.55% of the control group. The rates of malunion were 18.2% and 41.8%, respectively. There was a significant relationship between the functional and radiological results. Soft-tissue extrusion was present initially in 69.1% of the SRS patients; most deposits disappeared progressively, but persisted in 32.73% at one year. We conclude that the injection of a remodellable bone cement into the trabecular defect of fractures of the distal radius provides a better clinical and radiological result than conventional treatment. We compared Norian SRS, an injectable calcium phosphate bone cement, with external fixation in the treatment of redisplaced distal radial fractures by a prospective randomized study in 40 patients (women 50-80 years or men 60-80 years). After rereduction, the fracture was either stabilized by injection of SRS and immobilized with a cast for 2 weeks, or externally fixed with Hoffman's bar for 5 weeks. Each patient was evaluated at 2, 5, 7 weeks and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Functional parameters were grip strength, range of motion and pain. Radiographic parameters were radial angle, ulnar variance and dorsal tilt. The chosen primary effect variable was grip strength at 7 weeks. Patients treated by injection of SRS apatite had better grip strength, wrist extension and forearm supination at 7 weeks. There was no difference in functional parameters at 3 months or later. None of the methods could fully stabilize the fracture: radiographs showed a progressive redislocation over time. The results indicate that SRS can be used in the treatment of unstable distal radial fractures. The more rapid recovery of grip strength and wrist mobility in the SRS group appears to be due to the shorter immobilization time. We performed a prospective, randomised trial on 120 patients with redisplaced fractures of the distal radius comparing four methods of treatment. The four treatment groups, each containing 30 patients, were remanipulation and plaster, open reduction and bone grafting, and closed external fixation with and without mobilisation of the wrist at three weeks. The radiological results showed improvement in angulation of the distal radius for the open reduction and bone grafting group. Functional results at six weeks, three and six months and at one year, however, showed no difference between any of the four groups. The main influence on final outcome was carpal malalignment which had a statistically significant negative effect on function. Distal radius fractures with a large metaphyseal defect often need defect filling. We assessed the reliability of a new allogenic transplant as a bone-graft substitute in comparison to autologous iliac crest bone-grafting.
                This prospective, randomized study included 90 patients. Fracture-osteosynthesis was done with 2.7 mm quarter-tube plates. Tutoplast-cancellous-chips were used as allografts. Clinical and radiologic parameters were determined at three and 12 months after surgery.
                Overall outcomes were assessed according to the Demerit Point System: There were 71% good-to-excellent results in the "Tutoplast"; group and 75% good-to-excellent in the "iliac crest" group. Radiologic parameters were comparable and within normal range. Complications deriving from iliac bone harvesting were notably more frequent in the iliac crest group. Operation time was significantly shorter in the Tutoplast group.
                By the use of the investigated allograft no adverse effects were detected on the outcome of the treated radius fractures. Therefore, this new allograft could be a desirable alternative to autologous bone grafting from the iliac crest, as operating and anesthetics times are shortened and complications of iliac crest bone grafting avoided.
Bone scaffolding may improve anatomical outcome compared with plaster cast alone but there is insufficient evidence to conclude on functional outcome and safety; or for other comparisons.