Routine drainage is not required in reduction mammaplasty. Draining after breast reduction: a randomised controlled inter-patient study. Drainage in breast reduction surgery: a prospective randomised intra-patient trail.
To date, there have been no randomized trials documenting the efficacy of closed suction drainage when applied to reduction mammaplasty. Despite this, it has become the standard of care. A recent retrospective review suggests that closed suction drainage is not necessary. This study attempts to resolve this issue in a prospective, randomized fashion. The Institutional Review Board of the College of Medicine of The Pennsylvania State University approved the study. Forty-nine consecutive patients who underwent reduction mammaplasty by the inferior pedicled techniques were enrolled. Each patient was randomized to having a drain in either the right or left breast. The other breast was undrained. Patients were followed up for rate of complications and for patient satisfaction. Their ages ranged from 17 to 62 years, with a mean of 33 years. Weight of reduction from the drained breasts ranged from 360 to 1090 g, with a mean reduction of 675 g. Weight of reduction from the undrained group ranged from 380 to 1011 g, with a mean of 620 g. There were a total of 11 complications in the study. In the drained group, there were six complications out of 49 breasts (partial nipple loss in one, minor wound breakdown in two, fat necrosis in two, and hematoma in one). In the undrained group, there were five complications out of 49 breasts (partial nipple loss in none, minor wound breakdown in three, fat necrosis in one, and hematoma in one). Statistical analysis using the McNemar test revealed no significant difference between the two groups. A questionnaire revealed that the patients preferred the increased early postoperative comfort afforded by the absence of a drain. Performing reduction mammaplasty without the use of closed suction drainage is safe and is preferred by the patients. One hundred and seven bilateral breast reductions were prospectively randomised during surgery to receive or not receive wound drains. Fifty-five patients were randomised to have a drain and 52 to not have a drain. There was no statistical difference in the number of complications between the drained and undrained group (P=0.092; student's t-test for independent observations). Twenty-two of the 55 patients in the drained group had a complication, 12 of the 52 patients in the undrained group had a complication. The hospital stay was significantly shorter (P<0.001) in the undrained group. The main discomfort score due to the presence of the drains was 5.62, which can be qualified as high. This study demonstrates that breast reduction without postoperative draining does not increase the risk of complications, increases the patient's comfort and significantly reduces hospital stay. One hundred and fifty bilateral breast reductions were prospectively randomised intra-operatively to receive a unilateral wound drain. Seven patients required post-operative evacuation of haematoma, three on the drained and four on the undrained sides. There was no statistical difference in haematoma formation between drained and undrained sides (p = 1), or the incidence of wound healing or other complications. We believe that routine wound drainage in breast reduction surgery is an unnecessary intervention.
The limited evidence available shows no significant benefit of using post-operative wound drains in reduction mammoplasty, though hospital stay may be shorter when drains are not used. No data are available for breast augmentation or breast reconstruction, and this requires investigation.