Oral vs intravenous ciprofloxacin in the initial empirical management of severe pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infections: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Short-term effectiveness of ceftriaxone single dose in the initial treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women. A randomised controlled trial. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children. Oral ceftibuten switch therapy for acute pyelonephritis in children. Intravenous and oral ciprofloxacin versus intravenous ceftazidime for the treatment of severe urinary tract infections. The addition of ceftriaxone to oral therapy does not improve outcome in febrile children with urinary tract infections. Comparison of intravenous aminoglycoside therapy with switch therapy to cefixime in urinary tract infections. [Aztreonam vs norfloxacin: a comparative study of the treatment of urinary tract infections in ambulatory and hospitalized patients]. Comparative study of cefixime alone versus intramuscular ceftizoxime followed by cefixime in the treatment of urinary tract infections in children. Urinary tract infections with tissue penetration in children: cefotaxime compared with amoxycillin/clavulanate. Outpatient treatment of pyelonephritis in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.
There are few data on the efficacy of oral antibiotics in the initial empirical management of severe forms of urinary tract infection (UTI).
                In a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial we compared oral (500 mg twice daily) vs intravenous ciprofloxacin (200 mg twice daily) in the initial empirical management of hospitalized patients with serious forms of UTI. Exclusion criteria were severe sepsis, inability to take oral medication, or the presence of obstruction or renal foci of suppuration. The study population included 66 women with pyelonephritis, 43 patients with community-acquired UTIs, and 32 patients with hospital-acquired UTIs. The frequency of bacteremia was 28 (42%) of 66 in the patients with pyelonephritis and 25 (33%) of 75 in those with complicated UTIs. Seventy-two patients were randomized to treatment with oral and 69 to intravenous ciprofloxacin.
                There were no infection-related deaths and no patients required an early change of antibiotics because of worsening clinical status during the initial empirical phase of treatment. The mean duration of fever was 1.7 days in patients treated by the oral vs 1.9 days in patients treated by the intravenous route (P = .15). The rates of microbiological failure (3% in the oral vs 2% in the intravenous treatment group) and of unsatisfactory clinical response (4% oral vs 3% intravenous) were low. A treatment change was eventually required in 14% of the patients assigned to the oral and 7% of the patients assigned to the intravenous regimen, mainly because of the isolation of enterococci or ciprofloxacin-resistant organisms in pretherapy urine specimens.
                In the hospital setting, oral ciprofloxacin is as effective as the intravenous regimen in the initial empirical management of serious UTIs, including bacteremic forms, in patients without severe sepsis, obstruction, or renal foci of suppuration. The efficacy of the oral regimen indicates a potential use for ciprofloxacin in outpatient treatment of a subset of patients currently hospitalized on account of disease severity. To compare the short-term effectiveness of ceftriaxone single dose followed by cefixime with a standard treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women.
                An open, prospective, and randomised trial of women with acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis was performed. Group A were given a daily intravenous dose of 1 g ceftriaxone; group B: ceftriaxone 1 g intravenous single dose followed by oral cefixime. When urine culture was received, both groups completed a 10 day treatment based in sensitivity studies. Only women with positive initial urine culture were included. After three days of treatment, clinical and bacteriological efficacy was assessed. Clinical response was classified as "cured" if acute symptoms (fever, urinary syndrome and flank pain) were settled. Bacteriological response was classified as: eradication, or no eradication.
                Of 144 eligible patients, urine culture was positive in 54 of 72 (75%) women in group A and 51 of 72 (71%) in group B. There were no significant differences between groups in resolution of acute symptoms. Clinical cure was observed in 49 of 54 (91%) patients in the group A and in 47 of 51 (92%) patients in the group B (p = 0.68). After three days of treatment urine culture was negative for all patients. No adverse effects were observed in either of the groups.
                These data suggest that a intravenous single dose of ceftriaxone followed by oral cefixime is both effective and safe for the initial treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in women. This regimen could be useful in managing selected patients with pyelonephritis as outpatients. The standard recommendation for treatment of young, febrile children with urinary tract infection has been hospitalization for intravenous antimicrobials. The availability of potent, oral, third-generation cephalosporins as well as interest in cost containment and avoidance of nosocomial risks prompted evaluation of the safety and efficacy of outpatient therapy.
                In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oral versus initial intravenous therapy in 306 children 1 to 24 months old with fever and urinary tract infection, in terms of short-term clinical outcomes (sterilization of the urine and defervescence) and long-term morbidity (incidence of reinfection and incidence and extent of renal scarring documented at 6 months by 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans). Children received either oral cefixime for 14 days (double dose on day 1) or initial intravenous cefotaxime for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days.
                Treatment groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics. Bacteremia was present in 3.4% of children treated orally and 5.3% of children treated intravenously. Of the short-term outcomes, 1) repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 hours in all children, and 2) mean time to defervescence was 25 and 24 hours for children treated orally and intravenously, respectively. Of the long-term outcomes, 1) symptomatic reinfections occurred in 4.6% of children treated orally and 7.2% of children treated intravenously, 2) renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously, and 3) mean extent of scarring was approximately 8% in both treatment groups. Mean costs were at least twofold higher for children treated intravenously ($3577 vs $1473) compared with those treated orally.
                Oral cefixime can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for children with fever and urinary tract infection. Use of cefixime will result in substantial reductions of health care expenditures. The available oral third generation of cephalosporin, "ceftibuten" was used to substitute the intravenous drug after defervescence in acute pyelonephritis in children. This randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of an oral ceftibuten switch therapy with a ceftriaxone in both short-term and long-term outcomes. 36 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan proved pyelonephritis patients were randomized into the study group, "ceftibuten" (N=18) and the control group, "ceftriaxone" (N=18). Ceftriaxone (75 mg/kg/day) was the initial antibiotic in both groups. After defervescence for 24-48 hours, oral ceftibuten (9 mg/kg/day) was substituted in the study group and continued for 10 days. The subject characteristics and laboratory data were not different between the two groups. The urine culture at D14 was sterilized in both groups. The incidence of renal scarring was 66.6 per cent and 61.1 per cent in the study group and the control group respectively. The rate of recurrent infection showed no statistical significance. The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the study group than in the control. In conclusion, oral ceftibuten switch therapy can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for acute pyelonephritis in children. The use of oral therapy may result in a significant reduction of health care expenditure. nan To determine whether the addition of a single dose of ceftriaxone sodium to a 10-day course of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole hastens urine sterilization or resolution of clinical symptoms in febrile children with urinary tract infections.
                Prospective, single-blind, randomized study.
                Tertiary care children's hospital emergency department.
                Febrile children aged 6 months to 12 years with a presumptive urinary tract infection based on history, physical examination, and urinalysis findings.
                A history was taken, a physical examination and urinalysis and culture were performed, and a white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were obtained. Children were randomized to receive an intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone then 10 days of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (IM + PO group) or oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole alone (PO group). After receiving study medication, patients were discharged from the hospital to return in 48 hours for a follow-up evaluation and urine culture. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence of a positive culture at 48 hours or the need for hospital admission for intravenous rehydration or antibiotic therapy.
                Sixty-nine children were enrolled, 34 in the IM + PO group and 35 in the PO group. The 2 groups were similar at the initial visit with respect to age, sex, clinical degrees of illness, white blood cell count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P>.05). At the 48-hour follow-up visit, there were no differences between the 2 treatment groups in resolution of vomiting, fever, general appearance, abdominal tenderness, and hydration state (P>.05). There were 9 treatment failures, 4 in the IM + PO group and 5 in the PO group (P =.93).
                The addition of a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone to a 10-day course of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for urinary tract infection with fever resulted in no difference at 48 hours in the urine sterilization rate, degree of clinical improvement, or subsequent hospital admission rate. nan Eighty-two evaluable patients suffering from UTI were randomly treated with parenteral Aztreonam (1 g OD in cystitis and 1 g BID in pyelonephritis) or oral Norfloxacin (400 mg BID). Predisposing urological conditions were present in 75% and 78.5% respectively. Microbiological cultures at the end of treatment and at a follow-up visit after 4 weeks showed significantly better results among Aztreonam treated patients (microbiological cure: 97.5% vs 71.4%-p less than or equal to 0.005). Clinical cure was achieved in 97.5% and 71.4% respectively (p less than or equal to 0.001). A statistically significant difference was present only in patients treated for pyelonephritis (microbiological cure-AZT: 100%; NOR: 50%-p less than or equal to 0.0005) and not in those with cystitis (AZT: 95.0%; NOR: 83.3%). Side effects were rare in both treatments. Aztreonam seems to offer major advantages, when compared to Norfloxacin, in the treatment of UTI, especially when upper urinary tract is involved. Urinary tract infections (UTI) can cause acute morbidity and may result in severe problems, including hypertension and reduced renal function. Diagnosis of UTI is extremely important since prompt treatment may prevent damage. In the present study we compared the efficacy of oral cefixime to initial intramuscular ceftizoxime followed by cefixime for the treatment of UTI in children. Fifty-four children were studied. They were randomized to receive either oral cefixime 8 mg/kg/day for 10 days or initial intramuscular ceftizoxime (Cefizox) 50 mg/kg twice a day for 2 days followed by oral cefixime for 8 days. Treatment groups were comparable regarding age, sex, clinical, and laboratory findings. Escherichia coli was isolated from 80% of patients. Repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 hours in all children. Cure rates were comparable in both groups (92% vs 86% at the end of treatment). No serious adverse effects were observed. We concluded that oral cefixime is a safe and effective alternative treatment. In children, the site of urinary tract infection (acute pyelonephritis or cystitis) cannot usually be accurately determined from the clinical presentation. The severity of the urinary tract infection (risk of renal scars) is best correlated with its estimated degree of tissue penetration clinically (fever, general condition) and on laboratory tests (sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein). The duration of parenteral antibiotic therapy, especially in children (taking account of difficult venous access and the cost of hospitalization) needs to be specified beyond the initial period required for sterilization of the urine (usually less than 48 h). We conducted a study in children older than one year to compare the efficacy and tolerance of two treatment regimens for urinary tract infection with tissue penetration: cefotaxime 100 mg/kg/d in four divided iv doses for 14 days (group I) and amoxycillin/clavulanate 100 mg/kg/d in four divided iv doses for seven days with conversion to the oral route at a dosage of 50 mg/kg/d for seven days (group II). The randomised protocol included ten patients in each group, comparable with respect to sex, age and history. Clinical efficacy (time until the patient became afebrile), bacteriological efficacy (sterilization of the urine), and biological efficacy (time to normalization of the indices of the acute inflammatory response) were identical for both groups regardless of the duration of iv antibiotic treatment (seven days for amoxycillin/clavulanate; 14 days for cefotaxime). The only side effect was diarrhoea, which affected three patients and did not require modification of the oral treatment regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To compare the safety and efficacy of outpatient and inpatient treatment of pyelonephritis in pregnancy.
                We performed a randomized controlled trial of pregnant women with pyelonephritis before 24 weeks' estimated gestational age, comparing inpatient and outpatient treatment. Sixty inpatients received cefazolin intravenously until afebrile for 48 hours, and 60 outpatients received two injections of ceftriaxone intramuscularly. All patients completed a 10-day course of oral cephalexin. We performed a urine culture 5-14 days after completion of therapy.
                The two groups were similar with respect to age, parity, temperature, estimated gestational age, initial white blood cell count, and incidence of bacteremia. Escherichia coli was the major uropathogen isolated (86% of cultures, 95 of 111). Twelve percent (13 of 111) of bacteria were resistant to cefazolin. Eleven outpatients and 12 inpatients had positive urine cultures after therapy (relative risk 0.9, 95% confidence interval 0.4-1.9). Three patients in each group had recurrent pyelonephritis. We switched six inpatients to gentamicin because of a worsening clinical picture (two) or a prolonged febrile course (four); no outpatients required a change in antibiotic (Fisher exact test, P = .03). One preterm delivery occurred in an inpatient with recurrent pyelonephritis.
                Outpatient antibiotic therapy is effective and safe in selected pregnant women with pyelonephritis.
There is no evidence suggesting that oral antibiotic therapy is less effective for treatment of severe UTI than parenteral or initial parenteral therapy. The results of this review suggest that the mode of application does not determine therapeutic success.