Epoetin delta: efficacy in the treatment of anaemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Effects of anemia correction with epoetin beta in patients receiving radiochemotherapy for advanced cervical cancer. Effects of epoetin-alpha on quality of life of cancer patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy. Randomised, phase III trial of epoetin-β to treat chemotherapy-induced anaemia according to the EU regulation. Evaluation of epoetin supplemented with oral iron in patients with solid malignancies and chronic anemia not receiving anticancer treatment. Epoetin alpha prevents anaemia and reduces transfusion requirements in patients undergoing primarily platinum-based chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer. Recombinant human erythropoietin treatment in cisplatin-associated anemia: a randomized, double-blind trial with placebo. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of epoetin alfa in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer and anemia. Weekly epoetin alfa maintains hemoglobin, improves quality of life, and reduces transfusion in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Effect of once-weekly epoetin beta on survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy: results of the Breast Cancer-Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) study. Erythropoietin reduces anemia and transfusions: A randomized trial with or without erythropoietin during chemotherapy. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of quality of life, hematologic end points, and safety of weekly epoetin alfa in children with cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Long-term therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu-EPO) in progressing multiple myeloma. Impact of epoetin beta on quality of life in patients with malignant disease. A dose- and schedule-finding study of darbepoetin alpha for the treatment of chronic anaemia of cancer. Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on quality of life in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: results of a randomized, controlled trial. Epoetin Theta in Anaemic Cancer Patients Receiving Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of maintaining hemoglobin levels above 12.0 g/dL with erythropoietin vs above 10.0 g/dL without erythropoietin in anemic patients receiving concurrent radiation and cisplatin for cervical cancer. Weekly administration of epoetin beta for chemotherapy-induced anemia in cancer patients: results of a multicenter, Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Phase III, randomized, double-blind study of epoetin alfa compared with placebo in anemic patients receiving chemotherapy. Erythropoietin to treat head and neck cancer patients with anaemia undergoing radiotherapy: randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of erythropoietin in non-small-cell lung cancer with disease-related anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin therapy for anemic cancer patients on combination chemotherapy. Safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alpha in previously untreated extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with platinum plus etoposide. Randomized phase III trial evaluating the role of erythropoietin in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced anemia. Recombinant Human Erythropoietin (rHuEPO) for the Treatment of the Anemia of Cancer. Erythropoietin for patients undergoing radiotherapy: a pilot study. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel ± darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--results at the time of surgery. PREPARE trial: a randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative, dose-dense, dose-intensified chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and CMF versus a standard-dosed epirubicin-cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without darbepoetin alfa in primary breast cancer--outcome on prognosis. Feasibility of quantifying the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on cognitive function in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Controlled multicentre study of the influence of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin on anaemia and transfusion dependency in patients with ovarian carcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Effect of recombinant human erythropoietin combined with granulocyte/ macrophage colony-stimulating factor in the treatment of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. GM/EPO MDS Study Group. Recombinant human erythropoietin in the anemia associated with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: dose finding and identification of predictors of response. Recombinant human erythropoietin in transfusion-dependent anemic patients with multiple myeloma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma--a randomized multicenter study. The European Study Group of Erythropoietin (Epoetin Beta) Treatment in Multiple Myeloma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma. Recombinant human erythropoietin in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia and prevention of transfusion requirement associated with solid tumors: a randomized, controlled study. Epoetin alfa in platinum-treated ovarian cancer patients: results of a multinational, multicentre, randomised trial. Efficacy and safety analysis of epoetin alfa in patients with small-cell lung cancer: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Double-blind randomized control trial of the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin on chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Epoetin alfa improves anemia and anemia-related, patient-reported outcomes in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy: results of a European, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Randomized, dose-finding study of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies. Effect of subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: final report of a randomized, open-labelled, phase II trial. Prevention of anemia in patients with solid tumors receiving platinum-based chemotherapy by recombinant human Erythropoietin (rHuEpo): a prospective, open label, randomized trial by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Epoetin Theta with a New Dosing Schedule in Anaemic Cancer Patients Receiving Nonplatinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Epoetin alfa in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of the randomized placebo-controlled GHSG HD15EPO trial. Darbepoetin alpha for the treatment of anemia in patients with active cancer not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy: results of a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of every-3-week darbepoetin alfa 300 micrograms for treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. Effects of epoetin alfa on hematologic parameters and quality of life in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Recombinant human erythropoietin and platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with subcutaneous recombinant human erythropoietin in patients with low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III trial of darbepoetin alfa in lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Efficacy and safety of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa in patients with anemia of cancer: a controlled, randomized, open-label phase II trial. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of recombinant human erythropoietin, epoetin Beta, in hematologic malignancies. Multicenter randomized Phase II study of paclitaxel (1-hour infusion), fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and concomitant twice daily radiation with or without erythropoietin for advanced head and neck cancer. Darbepoetin alfa administered every 3 weeks alleviates anaemia in patients with solid tumours receiving chemotherapy; results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised study. Maintaining normal hemoglobin levels with epoetin alfa in mainly nonanemic patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy: a survival study. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced anemia by the use of erythropoietin in patients with primary malignant bone tumors (a double-blind, randomized, phase III study). The decision to prematurely terminate a trial of R-HuEPO due to thrombotic events. Recombinant human erythropoietin for platinum-based chemotherapy-induced anaemia: A single-centre randomised study. Recombinant human erythropoietin therapy for anemic cancer patients receiving cisplatin chemotherapy. Erythropoietin treatment under polychemotherapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies: a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study. Randomized phase III trial of sequential adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without erythropoietin Alfa in patients with high-risk cervical cancer: results of the NOGGO-AGO intergroup study. Treating anemia of cancer with every-4-week darbepoetin alfa: final efficacy and safety results from a phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Effects of early intervention with epoetin alfa on transfusion requirement, hemoglobin level and survival during platinum-based chemotherapy: Results of a multicenter randomised controlled trial. Efficacy of epoetin alfa in the treatment of anaemia of multiple myeloma. Effect of epoetin alfa on survival and cancer treatment-related anemia and fatigue in patients receiving radical radiotherapy with curative intent for head and neck cancer.
To assess the effect of epoetin delta on anaemia in patients with cancer who were receiving chemotherapy.
                This report includes data from two 12-week studies of epoetin delta: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of three times weekly epoetin delta (150 or 300IU/kg) and an open-label extension collecting further efficacy and safety information, in which patients initially received epoetin delta 150IU/kg. Co-primary end points for the double-blind study were an increase in haemoglobin levels and a reduction in the requirement for red blood cell transfusions compared with placebo.
                Double-blind study: 313 cancer patients were randomised to epoetin delta or placebo. Epoetin delta was associated with a significantly greater increase in haemoglobin levels from baseline compared with placebo (epoetin delta 150 and 300IU/kg vs placebo: 2.5 and 2.5g/dl vs 0.6g/dl; P<0.0001 for both comparisons), meeting one co-primary end point. However, there were no significant differences between groups in the proportion of patients requiring red blood cell transfusions (epoetin delta 150 and 300IU/kg vs placebo: 26.0 and 21.9% vs 26.9%), the second co-primary end point. Open-label study: 149 patients entered the extension study. During the extension, haemoglobin levels were maintained and a higher proportion of patients who previously received placebo required transfusions than those who had previously received epoetin delta (previous epoetin delta 150 and 300IU/kg: 7.1 and 11.4% vs previous placebo: 15.9%). Adverse events were as expected for this population in both studies.
                Epoetin delta shows potential as a treatment for anaemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with cervical cancer frequently suffer from anemia. This two-stage, adaptive-design study investigated the effect of anemia correction with epoetin beta on treatment outcomes. Patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer received radiochemotherapy (RCT) and were randomized to epoetin 150 IU/kg three times weekly (n = 34) or standard care (control; n = 40) for up to 12 weeks. Primary end point for stage 1 aimed to establish a correlation between anemia correction and treatment failure (no complete response or relapsing within 6 months after RCT initiation) as a proof of concept before moving into stage 2. Secondary end points included progression/relapse-free survival, overall survival, response to RCT, hemoglobin (Hb) response, and safety. Median baseline Hb was 11.4 and 11.6 g/dL in epoetin and control groups, respectively. At treatment end point, median Hb increased by 1.3 g/dL with epoetin, but decreased by 0.7 g/dL in the control group (P < 0.0001). No significant correlation between Hb increase and treatment failure was demonstrated. There were no significant differences between epoetin and control groups in progression/relapse-free survival (29.4% vs 32.5% patients with events; P = 0.96), overall survival (23.5% vs 12.5% patients with events; P = 0.22) or overall complete response (53% vs 58%; P = 0.86). Adverse events were well matched between groups. This study shows that epoetin beta rapidly, effectively, and safely increases Hb levels in patients with cervical cancer receiving RCT. No positive correlation of Hb increase and improvement in clinical outcomes could be demonstrated. Erythropoietin corrects and prevents anemia and decreases the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions; its impact on quality of life (QOL) of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy is not clear.
                399 patients with solid tumors and Hb level of < or = 12 g/dl receiving chemotherapy were randomized to receive or not 10,000 IU epoetin-alpha thrice weekly. QOL was measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) scale and various subscales at baseline, at two months and at the end of the study.
                Changes in the average QOL scores were similar in the two groups. The improvement in Hb levels was significantly higher for the epoetin-alpha group, with a decrease in transfusion requirements compared to the control group.
                Epoetin-alpha does not improve QOL of patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy as assessed using FACT-An scale and various subscales, despite improving Hb levels and reducing transfusion requirements. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) effectively decrease the transfusion requirements of patients with chemotherapy-induced anaemia (CIA). Recent studies indicate that ESAs increase mortality and accelerate tumour progression. The studies also identify a 1.6-fold increased risk of venous thromboembolism. The ESA labelling was thus revised in Europe and the United States in 2008. This is the first randomised, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of epoetin-β (EPO), an ESA, dosed in accordance with the revised labelling, which specifies that ESAs should be administered to CIA patients with a haemoglobin level of ≤ 10 g dl⁻¹ and that a sustained haemoglobin level of > 12 g dl⁻¹ should be avoided.
                A total of 186 CIA patients (8.0 g dl⁻¹ ≤ haemoglobin ≤ 10.0 g dl⁻¹) with lung or gynaecological cancer were randomised to receive EPO 36,000 IU or placebo weekly for 12 weeks.Results:The proportion of patients receiving transfusions or with haemoglobin < 8.0 g dl⁻¹ between week 5 and the end of the treatment period as the primary end point was significantly lower in the EPO group (n=89) than in the placebo group (n=92; 10.0% vs 56.4%, P < 0.001). The proportion receiving transfusions was significantly lower in the EPO group (4.5% vs 19.6%, P=0.002). Changes in quality of life were not different. No significant differences in adverse events - for example, the incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.1% for each group - or the 1-year overall survival were observed between groups.
                Weekly EPO administered according to the revised labelling approved by the European Medicines Agency is effective and well tolerated for CIA treatment. Further investigations are needed on the effect of ESAs on mortality. To evaluate the effectiveness and improvement in quality of life (QOL) of epoetin alfa administration supplemented with oral iron as a therapeutic regimen for patients with solid malignancies and anemia of chronic disease (ACD), not receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
                A total of 100 patients with cancer-related anemia, not subjected to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, were randomized to receive for a maximum of 24 weeks either oral iron, equivalent to 200 mg elemental iron once daily, or epoetin alfa 40,000 IU subcutaneously once weekly plus oral iron once daily.
                Patients in the epoetin alfa group had, from baseline to study end, a mean increase in hemoglobin (Hb) levels of 2.4 g/dL, whereas in the control group the mean Hb level decreased by 0.1 g/dL, (p<0.001). Improvement in QOL as assessed by the LASA and the FACT-An questionnaire were greater in patients in the epoetin alfa group than in the control group (mean change, LASA-energy level: 30.4 mm vs. 0.4 mm, -daily activities: 31.7 mm vs. 0.4 mm, -overall well-being. 32.4 mm vs. 4.9, FACT-An: 43.3 vs. 13.4, respectively). As for ECOG score, patients in the epoetin alfa group had a mean improvement of 0.16 from baseline to study end (control group: 0.06). Improvement in QOL parameters and in ECOG scores correlated positively with increased hemoglobin levels.
                Our results suggest that weekly epoetin alfa therapy supplemented with daily oral iron increases Hb levels and improves QOL in patients with solid malignancies and ACD who are not receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. This regimen offers optimal therapy in this population taking into consideration physician's convenience and patient's compliance. Anaemia commonly occurs in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, often necessitating blood transfusion. This multicentre study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epoetin alpha in preventing the decline in haemoglobin (Hb) level, and to determine whether the transfusion requirement could be reduced, in patients receiving 4-6 cycles of primarily platinum-based combination cyclic chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). A total of 130 non-anaemic SCLC patients were randomized to receive no additional treatment (n = 44), epoetin alpha 150 IU kg(-1) subcutaneously (s.c.) three times a week (n = 42) or 300 IU kg(-1) s.c. three times a week (n = 44). Reductions in epoetin alpha dosage were made during the study if Hb level increased to >15 g dl(-1). The mean weekly dosage was 335 and 612 IU kg(-1), respectively, in the two active treatment groups. Significantly fewer (P < 0.05) epoetin alpha-treated patients experienced anaemia (Hb < 10 g dl(-1)) during the course of chemotherapy (300 IU kg(-1), 39%; 150 IU kg(-1), 48%; untreated, 66%). This was reflected in the significantly lower number of treated patients transfused [300 IU kg(-1), 20% (P< 0.001); 150 IU kg(-1), 45% (P< 0.05); untreated, 59%]. Epoetin alpha was well-tolerated, and there was no evidence of sustained, clinically significant, hypertension. In summary, epoetin alpha is effective and well-tolerated in maintaining Hb level and reducing transfusion requirement in patients undergoing cyclic chemotherapy for SCLC. To evaluate the effect of exogenous recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on the increase of hemoglobin levels and on the transfusion requirements in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-induced anemia, we performed a double-blind randomized trial with placebo.
                One hundred patients with CDDP-associated anemia (hemoglobin level < 90 g/L) were randomized to receive either placebo (saline solution) or rHuEPO (100 U/kg body weight subcutaneously) three times per week. The end points of this study were the increase in hemoglobin levels to greater than 100 g/L after 3, 6, and 9 weeks and the effect on transfusion requirements.
                Ninety-nine of 100 patients were assessable for response and toxicity. In the rHuEPO arm, mean hemoglobin levels were statistically significantly increased after the third, sixth, and ninth weeks of therapy (101.1 +/- 9.0, 102.4 +/- 6.6, and 105.1 +/- 9.4 g/L, respectively) compared with the mean baseline value (86.3 +/- 6.2 g/L). In the placebo arm, there were no increases in mean hemoglobin levels at the third, sixth, and ninth weeks (81.0 +/- 5.2, 81.3 +/- 9.2, and 81.2 +/- 11 g/L, respectively) compared with the mean baseline value (87.3 +/- 5.2 g/L). Furthermore only 20% of patients required blood transfusions in the rHuEPO arm versus 56% of patients in the placebo arm (P = .01), with a mean units of blood transfused per patient of 0.30 in the rHuEPO arm and 1.8 in the placebo arm (P = .01). Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant side effects.
                CDDP-induced anemia is corrected by rHuEPO, which results in reduced blood transfusion requirements. nan Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U once weekly (qw) to anemic cancer patients receiving chemotherapy increases hemoglobin levels, improves quality of life (QOL), and reduces transfusions. The benefit of epoetin alfa in maintaining hemoglobin levels in cancer patients with hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL has not been evaluated.
                Breast cancer patients (N = 354) receiving chemotherapy were randomly assigned in 1:1 ratio to epoetin alfa (40,000 U qw) or standard of care (SOC). QOL was assessed at baseline and week 12. Hemoglobin responses, transfusion requirements, and prognostic factors for responses were measured.
                At week 12, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An; mean, 2.16 +/- 12.84 for epoetin alfa v -4.43 +/- 13.42 for SOC) and FACT-An fatigue (mean, 1.85 +/- 10.52 for epoetin alfa v -3.55 +/- 11.14 for SOC) change scores were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group (P < .0001). Hemoglobin responses defined as mean hemoglobin > or = 12 g/dL or a > or = 2 g/dL increase compared with baseline were significantly higher in the epoetin alfa group versus SOC: 52.0% v 5.1% and 65.7% v 6.3%, respectively (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Percentage transfused was significantly lower in the epoetin alfa group compared with SOC (8.6% v 22.9%). More than 90% of patients did not require a dose increase and 28.7% had a dose reduction.
                Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U qw is effective in improving QOL, maintaining hemoglobin level, and reducing transfusion requirements in breast cancer patients. The high effectiveness observed could be attributed in part to early treatment with epoetin alfa. The Breast Cancer-Anemia and the Value of Erythropoietin (BRAVE) study evaluated whether epoetin beta would improve survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).
                BRAVE was an open-label, randomized, multicenter study in patients with MBC treated with anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients (hemoglobin [Hb] < 12.9 g/dL) were randomly assigned (1:1) to epoetin beta 30,000 U subcutaneously once weekly or control for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was overall survival. Secondary efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival, transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival, Hb response, safety, and quality of life (QoL).
                After 18 months of follow-up, 62 (27%) of 231 patients survived with epoetin beta therapy and 63 (27%) of 232 with control. No difference was detected in overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.33, P = .522) or progression-free survival (HR = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.30, P = .448). There was a statistically significant benefit on transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival compared with control (HR = 0.59; P = .0097). Median Hb level increased with epoetin beta (11.7 g/dL at baseline to 13.3 g/dL at 24 weeks) but did not change with control (11.5 v 11.4 g/dL). Patients receiving epoetin beta experienced more thromboembolic events (TEEs) compared with controls (13% v 6%; P = .012) with no difference in serious TEEs (4% v 3%). Epoetin beta did not significantly improve QoL in this study where patients had a high baseline Hb value.
                In patients with MBC receiving chemotherapy and initial Hb less than 12.9 g/dL, epoetin beta increased Hb. No difference was detected in overall survival. Because of its superiority design, this study cannot, however, exclude clinically important differences in survival with absolute certainty. Anemia has been reported to develop during preoperative chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin. The use of recombinant human erythropoietin (EPO) has been shown to reduce anemia and subsequent packed red blood cell transfusions. The current study is a report of a Phase III, prospective, randomized trial with or without EPO that confirms the original observations of less anemia and fewer transfusions in those patients randomized to receive EPO concurrently with paclitaxel and carboplatin.
                Thirty patients with advanced head and neck or lung carcinoma were treated with 2 courses of paclitaxel, 230 mg/m(2), and carboplatin, 7.5 mg/mL/minute, repeated every 21 days. The treatment group was comprised of 15 patients randomized to receive concurrent EPO, 150 U/kg, 3 times per week; in patients deemed nonresponsive the dose was increased to 300 U/kg and 450 U/kg in subsequent courses. The control group was comprised of 15 patients randomized not to receive EPO.
                Twenty-seven patients were evaluable. After 2 courses of chemotherapy the mean hemoglobin decrease was 1.2 g/dL in the EPO group versus 2.8 g/dL in the control group (P = 0.037). There was a highly significant decrease in hemoglobin over time in patients who did not receive EPO (P = 0.008). After 4 courses of chemotherapy, fewer patients were transfused in the EPO arm: 2 of 13 (15%) in the EPO treatment group versus 5 of 14 (36%) in the control group.
                There was significantly less anemia and transfusions were reduced by 50% in patients randomized to receive EPO during chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin.
                Copyright 1999 American Cancer Society. To evaluate the effects of once-weekly epoetin alfa (EPO) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), hemoglobin (Hb), transfusions, and tolerability in children with cancer.
                Anemic patients 5 years to 18 years of age receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy for nonmyeloid malignancies, excluding brain tumors, received intravenous EPO 600 units/kg to 900 units/kg or placebo once-weekly for 16 weeks. Patients and parents completed the pediatric health-related quality-of-life generic scales (GS) and cancer-specific scales (CS).
                One hundred eleven patients received EPO and 111 patients received placebo. Mean final values for GS total score (P = .763 among patients; P = .219 among parents) and CS domain scores (P > or = .238; P > or = .081, respectively) were not significantly different between treatment groups. EPO-treated patients had greater increases in Hb overall (P = .002) and were more likely to be transfusion free after 4 weeks (38.7% v 22.5%; P = .010). Change in Hb was correlated with change in PedsQL-GCS total score in the EPO group (r = 0.242; P = .018), but was not in the placebo group (r = 0.086; P = .430). Adverse events were comparable between treatment groups.
                This study confirmed the tolerability and hematologic benefits of once-weekly EPO in children with cancer. No significant difference in HRQOL was detected between treatment groups, but a significant positive correlation was observed between Hb changes and HRQOL changes in the EPO group. Additional studies are warranted to assess HRQOL when anemia is managed optimally in children with cancer. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu-EPO) is an effective growth factor for erythroid progenitor cells in anemia provoked by several conditions, including bone marrow tumors such as multiple myeloma (MM). We studied a group of 54 patients with MM undergoing second-induction chemotherapy. Thirty of them were randomly assigned to receive rHu-EPO at an initial dosage of 150 units/kg body weight three times a week, increased to 300 units/kg from the sixth week to the end of the 24-week study. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels increased in 77.7% of these patients by the eighth week. In addition, five transfusion-dependent patients in treatment with the VMCP protocol completed the trial without requiring blood supplement after the third month, whereas seven control patients required frequent supplements. Monthly assessment of hematologic parameters demonstrated the ability of rHu-EPO to increase reticulocyte counts, whereas five patients became resistant to the second-induction chemotherapy in apparent concurrence with their rHu-EPO therapy. The response to rHu-EPO in four of the five MM patients receiving cytotoxic protocols combined with alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) included an increase of serum IgM after the third month. This effect was not demonstrable in any other group, including three rHu-EPO-untreated patients undergoing alpha-IFN + VMCP combined therapy, as well as rHu-EPO-treated patients not receiving alpha-IFN. Our data suggest that alpha-IFN plus rHu-EPO treatment in MM patients is effective in restoring normal B cell function. These results may reflect in vivo the modulation of normal human B cells and lymphoblasts by rHu-EPO observed in vitro. This open-label, prospective study was conducted to compare the impact of epoetin beta vs standard care on quality of life (QoL) in anaemic patients with lymphoid or solid tumour malignancies. A total of 262 anaemic patients (haemoglobin [Hb]<or=11 g dl(-1)) were randomised to a 12-week treatment with s.c. epoetin beta (initial dose 150 IU kg(-1) three times weekly) or standard care. Transfusions were recommended for both groups at an Hb threshold of 8.5 g dl(-1). The primary efficacy variables were improvement in QoL as measured using the Short-Form-36 physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) score and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy fatigue and anaemia subscales (FACT-F and FACT-An). A visual analogue scale (VAS) was also used as a global QoL measure. Clinical response was defined as a >or=2 g dl(-1) increase in Hb level without need of transfusion after the initial 4 weeks of treatment. Baseline to final visit changes in SF-36 PCS, FACT-F and VAS scores were significantly greater with epoetin beta than with standard care (P<0.05); changes in FACT-An subscale score tended to be greater with epoetin beta (P=0.076). Epoetin beta significantly increased Hb concentrations relative to standard care (responders: 47% vs 13%; P<0.001). Levels of endogenous erythropoietin <50 mIU ml(-1) were significantly predictive of response (OR 2.496, 95% CI: 1.21-5.13). Epoetin beta therapy significantly improves QoL compared with standard care in anaemic patients with solid tumours and lymphoid malignancies. A multicentre study evaluated the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha administered weekly (QW), every 3 weeks (Q3W), and every 4 weeks (Q4W) to anaemic patients with cancer not concurrently receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. The QW portion (n=102) was an open-label, sequential, dose-escalation design; cohorts received darbepoetin alpha QW by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection at 0.5, 1.0, 2.25, or 4.5 micro g kg(-1) week(-1) for 12 weeks. The 12-week placebo-controlled, double-blind Q3W (6.75 micro g kg(-1)) and Q4W (6.75 or 10.0 micro g kg(-1)) schedules (n=86), which enrolled different patients, took place after the QW schedule and were followed by a 12-week, open-label phase. Patients were evaluated for change in haemoglobin end points and red blood cell transfusions, serum darbepoetin alpha concentration, and safety. Selected domains of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were measured. With QW dosing, at least 70% of each cohort had a haemoglobin increase from baseline of > or =2 g dl(-1) or a concentration > or =12 g dl(-1) (haematopoietic response). In the 4.5 micro g kg(-1) QW cohort, all patients achieved a haematopoietic response (100%; 95% confidence interval (CI)=100, 100). In the Q3W and Q4W schedules, all cohorts had at least 60% of patients who achieved a haematopoietic response. Darbepoetin alpha effectively increases haemoglobin concentration when given QW, Q3W, or Q4W. Less-frequent administration may benefit patients with chronic anaemia of cancer and their caregivers alike. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) would correct anemia and improve the quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. One hundred twenty-two patients with hemoglobin </=11.0 g/dl were randomized to receive rHuEPO 10,000 U three times weekly (n = 61) or no additional treatment (n = 61). Response was assessed by measuring changes in hemoglobin level and QOL. QOL was evaluated before each cycle of chemotherapy at baseline, Week 4, and Week 12 using two separate self-report questionnaires. The analyses indicated that the rHuEPO-treated patients experienced significantly less fatigue (P < 0.05) than their control group counterparts, and reported significantly higher scores on energy level (P < 0.05), ability to perform daily activities (P < 0.01), and overall QOL (P< 0.05). The overall change in hemoglobin level was significantly greater in the rHuEPO group than in the control group (1.7 g/dl versus 0.3 g/dl, P < 0.001). rHuEPO effectively corrects anemia and significantly improves QOL in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy. INTRODUCTION: Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) is used to treat symptomatic anaemia due to chemotherapy. A new r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio®), was investigated and compared to placebo and Epoetin beta in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in adult cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, using a fixed weekly starting dose of 20,000 IU Epoetin theta. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate (complete Hb response, Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 223 patients were randomised to s.c. treatment for 12 weeks with either Epoetin theta (n = 76) once per week, Epoetin beta (n = 73) three times per week or placebo (n = 74). The starting dose was 20,000 IU once weekly Epoetin theta or 450 IU/kg(BW) per week Epoetin beta administered in 3 equal weekly doses. RESULTS: In the Epoetin theta group were significantly more responders than in the placebo group (65.8 vs. 20.3%, P < 0.0001). Epoetin beta was also more effective than placebo (71.2 vs. 20.3%, P < 0.0001). The mean weekly dose at the time of complete Hb response was lower in the Epoetin theta group (30,000 IU) than in the Epoetin beta group (42,230 IU). Epoetin theta was clearly more effective than placebo. CONCLUSION: This small study showed, that Epoetin theta is a safe and effective treatment of symptomatic anaemia due to platinum-based chemotherapy in cancer patients. To determine whether maintaining HGB levels > or = 12.0 g/dL with recombinant human erythropoietin (R-HUEPO) compared to "standard" treatment (transfusion for HGB < or = 10.0 g/dL) improves progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) in women receiving concurrent weekly cisplatin and radiation (CT/RT) for carcinoma of the cervix. In addition, to determine whether platinum-DNA adducts were associated with clinical characteristics or outcome.
                Patients with stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer and HGB < 14.0 g/dL were randomly assigned to CT/RT+/-R-HUEPO (40,000 units s.c. weekly). R-HUEPO was stopped if HGB > 14.0 g/dL. Endpoints were PFS, OS and LC. Platinum-DNA adducts were quantified using immunocytochemistry assay in buccal cells.
                Between 08/01 and 09/03, 109 of 114 patients accrued were eligible. Fifty-two received CT/RT and 57 CT/RT+R-HUEPO. The study closed prematurely, with less than 25% of the planned accrual, due to potential concerns for thromboembolic event (TE) with R-HUEPO. Median follow-up was 37 months (range 9.8-50.4 months). PFS and OS at 3 years should be 65% and 75% for CT/RT and 58% and 61% for CT/RT+R-HUEPO, respectively. TE occurred in 4/52 receiving CT/RT and 11/57 with CT/RT+R-HUEPO, not all considered treatment related. No deaths occurred from TE. High-platinum adducts were associated with inferior PFS and LC.
                TE is common in cervical cancer patients receiving CT/RT. Difference in TE rate between the two treatments was not statistically significant. The impact of maintaining HGB level > 12.0 g/dL on PFS, OS and LC remains undetermined. The efficacy and safety of weekly administration of epoetin beta (EPO) for chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) patients was evaluated.
                One hundred and twenty-two patients with lung cancer or malignant lymphoma undergoing chemotherapy were randomized to the EPO 36 000 IU group or the placebo group. Hematological response and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirement were assessed. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire.
                Mean change in hemoglobin level with EPO increased significantly over placebo (1.4 +/- 1.9 g/dl versus -0.8 +/- 1.5 g/dl; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with change in hemoglobin level > or =2.0 g/dl was higher for EPO than those for placebo (P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of administration, the proportion of RBC transfusion or hemoglobin level <8.0 g/dl was significantly lower for EPO than those for placebo (P = 0.046). The changes in the FACT-An total Fatigue Subscale Score (FSS) were less deteriorated with EPO than those with placebo. Progressive disease (PD) did not influence the change in hemoglobin level but there was less decrease in FSS in non-PD patients. No significant differences in adverse events were observed. Thrombovascular events and pure red cell aplasia related to EPO were not observed. Retrospective analysis of survival showing the hazard ratio of EPO to placebo was 0.94.
                Weekly administration of EPO 36 000 IU significantly increased hemoglobin level and ameliorated the decline of QOL in CIA patients over the 8-week administration period. To determine whether weekly epoetin alfa could improve hemoglobin (HgB) levels, reduce RBC transfusions, and improve quality of life (QOL) in patients with advanced cancer and with anemia after receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.
                This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomly assigned patients to placebo or epoetin alfa (Ortho Biotech, Bridgewater, NJ) 40,000 U subcutaneous weekly for 16 weeks. QOL, HgB, and RBC transfusions were measured pretreatment and monthly.
                The study accrued 344 patients; 330 were assessable for efficacy and 305 were assessable for QOL. Placebo-treated patients had a mean increase in HgB of 0.9 g/dL (range, -3.8 to +5.3) compared with 2.8 g/dL (range, -2.2 to +7.5) for epoetin-treated patients (P < .0001). During the study, 31.7% of placebo-treated patients achieved a > or = 2 g/dL HgB increase compared with 72.7% of epoetin-treated patients (P < .0001). The incidence of RBC transfusion for placebo and epoetin treatment arms was 39.6% and 25.3% (P = .005), respectively. The placebo group received 256 units of RBCs compared with 127 units in the epoetin group (P < .0001). The incidence of toxicity in the groups was similar. Changes in the average QOL scores from baseline to the end of the study were similar in the two groups (P = not significant). The HgB responders (irrespective of treatment arm) had a mean change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) fatigue score from a baseline of +5.1 compared with -2.1 for the nonresponders (P = .006).
                Epoetin alfa significantly improved HgB and reduced transfusions in this patient population. These results support the use of weekly epoetin alfa as an ameliorative agent for cancer-related anemia. Anaemia is associated with poor cancer control, particularly in patients undergoing radiotherapy. We investigated whether anaemia correction with epoetin beta could improve outcome of curative radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer.
                We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 351 patients (haemoglobin <120 g/L in women or <130 g/L in men) with carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Patients received curative radiotherapy at 60 Gy for completely (R0) and histologically incomplete (R1) resected disease, or 70 Gy for macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) advanced disease (T3, T4, or nodal involvement) or for primary definitive treatment. All patients were assigned to subcutaneous placebo (n=171) or epoetin beta 300 IU/kg (n=180) three times weekly, from 10-14 days before and continuing throughout radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was locoregional progression-free survival. We assessed also time to locoregional progression and survival. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                148 (82%) patients given epoetin beta achieved haemoglobin concentrations higher than 140 g/L (women) or 150 g/L (men) compared with 26 (15%) given placebo. However, locoregional progression-free survival was poorer with epoetin beta than with placebo (adjusted relative risk 1.62 [95% CI 1.22-2.14]; p=0.0008). For locoregional progression the relative risk was 1.69 (1.16-2.47, p=0.007) and for survival was 1.39 (1.05-1.84, p=0.02).
                Epoetin beta corrects anaemia but does not improve cancer control or survival. Disease control might even be impaired. Patients receiving curative cancer treatment and given erythropoietin should be studied in carefully controlled trials. Previous trials have suggested a quality-of-life (QOL) improvement for anemic cancer patients treated with erythropoietin, but few used QOL as the primary outcome. We designed a trial to investigate the effects of epoetin alfa therapy on the QOL of anemic patients with advanced non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCLC).
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted. The proposed sample size was 300 patients. Eligible patients were required to have NSCLC unsuitable for curative therapy and baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) levels less than 121 g/L. Patients were assigned to 12 weekly injections of subcutaneous epoetin alpha or placebo, targeting Hgb levels between 120 and 140 g/L. The primary outcome was the difference in the change in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia scores between baseline and 12 weeks.
                Reports of thrombotic events in other epoetin trials prompted an unplanned safety analysis after 70 patients had been randomly assigned (33 to the active arm and 37 to the placebo arm). This revealed a significant difference in the median survival in favor of the patients on the placebo arm of the trial (63 v 129 days; hazard ratio, 1.84; P = .04). The Steering Committee closed the trial. Patient numbers compromised the interpretation of the QOL analysis, but a positive Hgb response was noted with epoetin alfa treatment.
                An unplanned safety analysis suggested decreased overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with epoetin alfa. Although infrequent, other similar reports highlight the need for ongoing trials evaluating erythropoietin receptor agonists to ensure that overall survival is monitored closely. Patients with advanced cancer frequently experience clinically significant anemia, which is often exacerbated by myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Consistent with the anemia of chronic disease, studies have documented serum erythropoietin levels that are inappropriately low for the degree of anemia in cancer patients. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy impairs erythropoiesis, which may not fully recover between treatment cycles. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been used safely and effectively to treat anemia in AIDS patients receiving zidovudine (AZT) and in patients with chronic renal failure.
                This study was designed to evaluate the clinical role of rHuEPO in reducing symptomatic anemia in patients with advanced cancer who were receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy (excluding cisplatin).
                We studied 153 anemic cancer patients receiving cyclic combination chemotherapy in a prospective multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either rHuEPO (150 U/kg) or placebo subcutaneously three times a week for a maximum of 12 weeks or until the hematocrit level increased to 38%-40%. If the hematocrit reached this target level before 12 weeks, the rHuEPO dose could be reduced to maintain the hematocrit at that level for the duration of the study. Response to rHuEPO therapy was assessed by measuring changes in hematocrit level, transfusion requirements, and quality of life. Quality-of-life assessment was based on patients' responses to questionnaires before and after the courses of therapy.
                The increase in hematocrit in the rHuEPO-treated group compared with hematocrit in the placebo-treated group was statistically significant (P = .0001) as measured by percentage point of change from baseline to final evaluation, by an increase in hematocrit level of six percentage points or more unrelated to transfusion, and by a rise in hematocrit level to 38% or more unrelated to transfusion. There was a trend toward the reduction in mean units of blood transfused per patient during months 2 and 3 of therapy combined in rHuEPO-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients (0.91 U versus 1.65 U; P = .056). In addition, rHuEPO-treated patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in energy level and ability to perform daily activities (P < or = .05). The two treatment groups showed no statistically significant differences in toxic effects except for increased incidence of diaphoresis (P < .05) and diarrhea (P = .05) in the rHuEPO-treated group.
                We conclude that rHuEPO is safe and effective for reversing anemia related to advanced cancer or to chemotherapy for cancer. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, phase III study was conducted in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer receiving first-line platinum-containing chemotherapy to determine if increasing or maintaining hemoglobin concentration with darbepoetin alpha could increase patient survival.
                Darbepoetin alpha (300 microg) or placebo was administered once per week for 4 weeks then every 3 weeks for up to six cycles of chemotherapy (carboplatin plus etoposide or cisplatin plus etoposide) plus 3 weeks after the last dose of chemotherapy. Patients with disease progression were observed until death or until all patients completed their end-of-study visit and 496 deaths had occurred. The two coprimary end points were change in hemoglobin concentration from baseline to the end of the chemotherapy period and overall survival; statistical testing of survival was done if change in hemoglobin was significant at P < .05.
                The study enrolled 600 patients. Patients' hemoglobin levels dropped due to the myelosuppressive chemotherapy; however, treatment with darbepoetin alpha maintained hemoglobin levels significantly higher than placebo (P < .001). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival between the treatment groups (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.11; P = .431). As expected, darbepoetin alpha was associated with a higher incidence of thromboembolic events (darbepoetin alpha, 9%; placebo, 5%). The transfusion risk was lower in the darbepoetin versus placebo group (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.55).
                The results of this study did not demonstrate improved survival after treatment with darbepoetin alpha; however, they reinforce the benefit of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in reducing transfusions and their neutral impact on survival in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia. Although erythropoietin (EPO) is known to be useful in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia, few data are available on its potential preventive role. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of EPO in preventing the development of clinically significant anemia in patients treated with chemotherapy.
                Sixty-two early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing accelerated adjuvant chemotherapy were randomized to receive EPO 150 U/kg three times a week or no additional treatment. Chemotherapy consisted of six cycles of cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 (CEF) intravenously on day 1, every 2 weeks with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), 5 microg/kg subcutaneously from day 4 to day 11.
                Throughout the six cycles of chemotherapy, EPO-treated patients maintained stable values of hemoglobin, whereas control patients developed a progressive anemia. At the end of chemotherapy, the mean (+/- SD) hemoglobin decrease in the control group was 3.05 g/dL (+/- 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 3.5), whereas in the EPO group it was 0.8 (+/- 1.4; 95% CI, 0.3 to 1.4). Clinically significant anemia (hemoglobin < or = 10 g/dL) occurred in 16 patients (52%; 95% CI, 33 to 69) in the control arm and in no patient (0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14) in the EPO arm (P = .00001).
                EPO prevents anemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further trials are required to identify subsets of patients in which the preventive use of this drug could be cost-effective. Advanced cancer is frequently associated with a significant anemia that may be due to the disease itself or the effect of concomitantly administered chemotherapeutic agents. In a series of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, three populations of anemic cancer patients were randomized to rHuEPO or placebo. The three populations were: A) patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy, B) patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens which did not contain cisplatin, and C) patients receiving chemotherapeutic regimens which contained cisplatin. In the no-chemotherapy trials, patients were treated with rHuEPO (100 U/kg) or placebo s.c. three times a week for up to eight weeks. In the two types of chemotherapy trials, patients were treated with rHuEPO (150 U/kg) or placebo SC three times a week for 12 weeks. A total of 413 patients were enrolled in these trials (124 in the no-chemotherapy group, 157 in the no-cisplatin chemotherapy group and 132 in the cisplatin chemotherapy group). In each trial, patients randomized to rHuEPO had a significantly greater (p <.004) increase in hematocrit than placebo-treated patients. In the two types of chemotherapy trials combined, utilizing an rHuEPO dose of 150 U/kg, rHuEPO-treated patients had significantly lower (p </=.009) transfusion requirements (percentage of patients transfused and mean units of blood transfused per patient) than placebo-treated patients during months two and three, but not during month one. Quality-of-life parameters measured on a 100 mm visual analog scale significantly improved (p<.05) in rHuEPO-treated patients whose hematocrit increased >/= 6 percentage points, compared to corresponding quality-of-life changes in placebo-treated patients. rHuEPO was well tolerated compared to placebo. The above results suggest that rHuEPO may be a useful agent to palliate the morbid consequences of the anemia that is often found in association with advanced cancer. To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of using recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) to correct decreased hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing radiotherapy and to get an estimate of its influence on the efficacy of radiotherapy.
                Fifty patients with cancer of the head and neck and the pelvis were randomized before radiotherapy to different rhEPO treatments (none, 3 x 150 U/kg per week i.v., 3 x 300 U/kg per week i.v. and 3 x 150 U/kg per week s.c.). Hematological parameters were evaluated weekly and the locoregional tumor control rates were determined in 38 patients with head and neck cancer.
                rhEPO-treated patients showed a significant increase in their hemoglobin values (0.7 g/100 ml per week). The rhEPO response was comparable for patients with cancer of the head and neck and the pelvis. A delayed recovery was seen when iron deficiency or impaired iron mobilization was present. No serious toxicity was observed. Locoregional tumor control was improved, although not statistically significantly, in those head and neck cancer patients who experienced a rapid rise of hemoglobin.
                Low hemoglobin levels can be safely and quickly corrected with rhEPO. This may improve the effectiveness of radiotherapy. Preoperative chemotherapy is a recommended treatment of both primary operable and locally advanced breast cancer. Strategies to improve efficacy include the use of anthracyclines, taxanes, and intensified dose with bone marrow support.
                Patients received neoadjuvant epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) (EC→T), each 3-weekly for four cycles (n = 370), or epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) followed by paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) with pegfilgrastim followed by CMF (cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), methotrexate 40 mg/m(2), fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 (E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF), each 2-weekly and for three cycles (n = 363). Patients were randomly allocated to either simultaneous darbepoetin alfa (DA) (n = 356) or none (n = 377).
                Pathological complete response (pCR) rate (breast) was higher with E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF, 18.7% versus 13.2% with EC→T; P = 0.043, ypT0/Tis; ypN0 was reported in 20.9% versus 14.3% respectively; P = 0.019. Patients with grade 3 tumors and negative hormone receptor status had a significantly higher pCR rate. Mean hemoglobin values maintained higher with DA (13.6 versus 12.6 g/dl). E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF regimen showed more grade 3-4 mucositis, sensory neuropathy, and neurological complaints. Thromboembolic events were more frequent on DA (3% versus 6%; P = 0.055).
                Dose-dense and -intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy with E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF was potentially superior to EC→T in terms of pCR. Primary use of DA did not affect pCR. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of dose-intensified neoadjuvant chemotherapy with that of standard epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel in combination with or without darbepoetin on survival in primary breast cancer.
                A total of 733 patients received either four cycles of neoadjuvant epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks followed by four cycles of paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks (EC→T), or three cycles of epirubicin 150 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks followed by three cycles of paclitaxel 225 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks followed by three cycles of combination chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF). The patients were randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin or none. The primary objective was to demonstrate a superior disease-free survival (DFS) of E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF compared with EC→T.
                Estimated 3-year DFS was 75.8% with EC→T versus 78.8% with E(dd)→T(dd)→CMF [hazard ratio (HR) 1.14; P = 0.37] and overall survival (OS) 88.4% versus 91.5% (HR 1.26; P = 0.237). Three-year DFS was 74.3% with darbepoetin versus 80.0% without (HR 1.31; P = 0.061) and OS 88.0% versus 91.8% (HR 1.33; P = 0.139). Patients with a pathologically documented complete response [pathological complete response (pCR)] had a significantly better DFS compared with those without achieving a pCR (estimated 3-year DFS: 89.2% versus 74.9%; HR 2.27; P = 0.001).
                Neoadjuvant dose-intensified chemotherapy compared with standard chemotherapy did not improve DFS, whereas the addition of darbepoetin might have detrimental effects on DFS. Impaired cognition, fatigue, and diminished quality of life (QOL) are commonly associated with breast cancer chemotherapy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial assessed the feasibility of quantifying the effects of epoetin alfa on cognitive function and mood, and evaluated its effects on fatigue and QOL in patients with breast cancer treated with anthracycline-based adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive epoetin alfa 40,000 U subcutaneously once weekly or placebo at the beginning of 4 cycles of chemotherapy administered over 12 weeks. Cognitive function was assessed by Executive Interview (EXIT25) and Clock Drawing Tasks; mood by Profile of Mood States; anemia-related symptoms, including fatigue, by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) subscale; and QOL by Linear Analog Scale Assessment. Ninety-four patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety. Mean change in EXIT25 scores from baseline to cycle 4 in the epoetin alfa group was 1.3 +/- 3.3; the mean change was 0.3 +/- 2.4 in the placebo group (a negative change indicates improved executive function). There was no difference between groups in mean change in EXIT25 score from baseline to 6-month follow-up assessment. Mean hemoglobin levels were higher in the epoetin alfa group compared with the placebo group after 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Epoetin alfa recipients had less of a decrease in FACT-An subscale scores from baseline to cycle 4 and improvement in FACT-An subscale scores at 6-month follow-up assessment compared with placebo. Epoetin alfa therapy was well tolerated. These data suggest that epoetin alfa may have attenuated the cognitive impairment and fatigue that occurred during adjuvant breast cancer chemotherapy. This randomised controlled multicentre trial evaluated the effectiveness of recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) in preventing anaemia and reducing the need for blood or erythrocyte transfusion in 122 ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. The patients were randomly allocated to receive rhEPO 150 U/kg or 300 U/kg subcutaneously, three times a week, or open control. Patients also received up to 6 cycles of carboplatin or cisplatin, alone or in combination with other cytotoxic agents. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 39.4% of patients in the control group received at least one blood transfusion, compared with 9.2% of patients treated with rhEPO. Patients treated with rhEPO experienced a significantly longer time to first erythrocyte transfusion than the control group and were less likely to experience nadir haemoglobin levels < 10 g/dl (P < 0.001 and < 0.05, respectively). A haemoglobin decrease < 1 g/dl during the first chemotherapy cycle, as well as a low baseline serum erythropoietin concentration, predicted a low transfusion need in rhEPO-treated patients but not in controls. During the study, 103 patients suffered at least one adverse event, but no serious, and only nine non-serious adverse events were considered possibly related to rhEPO therapy. These results indicate that treatment with rhEPO prevents anaemia, it reduces the need for blood or rhEPO erythrocyte transfusion in patients with ovarian cancer receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, and it is well tolerated. A starting dose of 150 U/kg of rhEPO, three times a week, may be recommended. This randomized, placebo-controlled trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of therapy with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) in anemic, neutropenic patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Sixty-six patients were enrolled according to the following French-American-British classification: refractory anemia (20), refractory anemia with excess blasts (35), refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts (9), and refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation (2). Patients were stratified by their serum erythropoietin levels (less than or equal to 500 mU/mL, n = 37; greater than 500 mU/mL, n = 29) and randomized, in a 2:1 ratio, to either GM-CSF (0.3-5.0 microg/kg.d) + epoetin alfa (150 IU/kg 3 times/wk) or GM-CSF (0.3-5.0 microg/kg.d) + placebo (3 times/wk). The mean neutrophil count rose from 948 to 3831 during treatment with GM-CSF +/- epoetin alfa. Hemoglobin response (increase greater than or equal to 2 g/dL, unrelated to transfusion) occurred in 4 of 45 (9%) patients in the GM-CSF + epoetin alfa group compared with 1 of 21 (5%) patients with GM-CSF + placebo group (P = NS). Percentages of patients in the epoetin alfa and the placebo groups requiring transfusions of red blood cells were 60% and 92%, respectively, for the low-endogenous erythropoietin patients and 95% and 89% for the high-endogenous erythropoietin patients (P = NS). Similarly, the average numbers of units of red blood cells transfused during the 12-week study in the epoetin alfa and the placebo groups were 5.9 and 9.5, respectively, in the low-endogenous erythropoietin patients and 9.7 and 8.6 in the high-endogenous erythropoietin patients (P = NS). GM-CSF +/- epoetin alfa had no effect on mean platelet count. Treatment was well tolerated in most patients, though 10 withdrew from the study for reasons related predominantly to GM-CSF toxicity. (Blood. 2000;95:1175-1179) Previous phase I-II clinical trials have shown that recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) can ameliorate anemia in a portion of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Therefore, we performed a randomized controlled multicenter study to define the optimal initial dosage and to identify predictors of response to rHuEpo. A total of 146 patients who had hemoglobin (Hb) levels < or = 11 g/dL and who had no need for transfusion at the time of enrollment entered this trial. Patients were randomized to receive 1,000 U (n = 31), 2,000 U (n = 29), 5,000 U (n = 31), or 10,000 U (n = 26) of rHuEpo daily subcutaneously for 8 weeks or to receive no therapy (n = 29). Of the patients, 84 suffered from MM and 62 from low- to intermediate-grade NHL, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia; 116 of 146 (79%) received chemotherapy during the study. The mean baseline Hb level was 9.4 +/- 1.0 g/dL. The median serum Epo level was 32 mU/mL, and endogenous Epo production was found to be defective in 77% of the patients, as judged by a value for the ratio of observed-to-predicted serum Epo levels (O/P ratio) of < or = 0.9. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed to evaluate treatment efficacy. The median average increase in Hb levels per week was 0.04 g/dL in the control group and -0.04 (P = .57), 0.22 (P = .05), 0.43 (P = .01), and 0.58 (P = .0001) g/dL in the 1,000 U, 2,000 U, 5,000 U, and 10,000 U groups, respectively (P values versus control). The probability of response (delta Hb > or = 2 g/dL) increased steadily and, after 8 weeks, reached 31% (2,000 U), 61% (5,000 U), and 62% (10,000 U), respectively. Regression analysis using Cox's proportional hazard model and classification and regression tree analysis showed that serum Epo levels and the O/P ratio were the most important factors predicting response in patients receiving 5,000 or 10,000 U. Approximately three quarters of patients presenting with Epo levels inappropriately low for the degree of anemia responded to rHuEpo, whereas only one quarter of those with adequate Epo levels did so. Classification and regression tree analysis also showed that doses of 2,000 U daily were effective in patients with an average platelet count greater than 150 x 10(9)/L. About 50% of these patients are expected to respond to rHuEpo. Thus, rHuEpo was safe and effective in ameliorating the anemia of MM and NHL patients who showed defective endogenous Epo production. From a practical point of view, we conclude that the decision to use rHuEpo in an individual anemic patient with MM or NHL should be based on serum Epo levels, whereas the choice of the initial dosage should be based on residual marrow function. One hundred twenty-one anemic, transfusion-dependent patients with multiple myeloma (MM) or low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) were randomly allocated to receive (a) recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) 10,000 U/d subcutaneously 7 days a week (fixed dose group) (n = 38), or (b) rhEPO 2,000 U/d subcutaneously for 8 weeks followed by step-wise escalation of the rhEPO dose (titration group) (n = 44), or (c) no rhEPO therapy (control group) (n = 39). The total treatment period was 24 weeks. There were no differences between the three groups with regard to baseline clinical, demographic, or health status measures. The cumulative response frequency, defined as elimination of the transfusion need in combination with an increase in the hemoglobin concentration by >20 g/L, was 60% in both rhEPO treatment groups and 24% in the control group (P = .01 and .02, respectively, log rank test). For patients in the titration group the response rate on the first dose level (2,000 U/d) was only 14%. Cox's univariate regression analysis revealed that an inadequately low endogenous erythropoietin concentration in relation to the degree of anemia and a baseline platelet concentration > or = 100 x 10(9)/L were significant predictors for response to rhEPO therapy (P < .01). Multivariate regression analysis showed that relative erythropoietin concentration was the most important factor and the platelet count had no additional influence on response. Treatment with rhEPO was well tolerated. We conclude that treatment with rhEPO may be indicated in anemic MM and NHL patients with a relative erythropoietin deficiency. An initial dose of 5,000 U/d subcutaneously may be recommended. Anemia is a common side effect of anticancer chemotherapy. Blood transfusion, previously the only available treatment for chemotherapy-induced anemia, may result in some clinical or subclinical adverse effects in the recipients. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) provides a new treatment modality for chemotherapy-induced anemia.
                To evaluate the effect of rhEPO on the need for blood transfusions and on hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations, 227 patients with solid tumors and chemotherapy-induced anemia were enrolled in a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Of 189 patients evaluable for efficacy, 101 received 5000 IU rhEPO daily s.c., while 88 patients received no treatment during the 12-week controlled phase of the study.
                The results demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in the need for blood transfusions (28% vs. 42%, P = 0.028) and in the mean volume of packed red blood cells transfused (152 ml vs. 190 ml, P = 0.044) in patients treated with rhEPO compared to untreated controls. This effect was even more pronounced in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy (26% vs. 45%, P = 0.038). During the controlled treatment phase, the median Hb values increased in the rhEPO patients while remaining unchanged in the control group. The response was seen in all tumor types.
                RhEPO administration at a dose of 5000 IU daily s.c. increases hemoglobin levels and reduces transfusion requirements in chemotherapy-induced anemia, especially during platinum-based chemotherapy. This multicentre, open-label, controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of epoetin alfa treatment on haematologic and quality of life (QOL) parameters in 182 anaemic (Hb< or = 12 g dl(-1)) ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy. Patients were randomised 2 : 1 to receive epoetin alfa 10,000-20 000 IU three times weekly plus best standard treatment (BST) or BST only. Main study end points were changes from baseline in haemoglobin (Hb) level, transfusion requirements, and QOL. For the epoetin alfa group, mean Hb increased by 1.8 g dl(-1) by weeks 4-6 and was significantly increased from baseline through study end (P<0.001). The mean change in Hb from baseline was significantly (P<0.001) greater for epoetin alfa than BST patients at all post-baseline evaluations. Significantly fewer epoetin alfa than BST patients required transfusion(s) after the first 4 weeks of treatment (7.9 vs 30.5%; P<0.001). Also, significant (P< or = 0.04) differences favouring the epoetin alfa group over the BST group were found for all three median CLAS scores (Energy Level, Ability to Do Daily Activities, Overall QOL) and the median average CLAS score during chemotherapy. These findings support use of epoetin alfa to increase Hb levels, reduce transfusion use, and improve QOL in anaemic ovarian cancer patients receiving platinum chemotherapy. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (N93-004) evaluated the effects of epoetin alfa on tumor response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).
                Adult patients with hemoglobin < or = 14.5 g/dL starting chemotherapy received epoetin alfa 150 U/kg or placebo subcutaneously 3 times weekly until 3 weeks after completion of chemotherapy. Survival was assessed for 3 years. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with complete or partial response after three chemotherapy cycles.
                The trial was terminated prematurely after 224 of a projected 400 patients were accrued. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Epoetin alfa and placebo patients (n = 109 and n = 115, respectively) had mean baseline hemoglobin of 12.8 g/dL and 13.0 g/dL, respectively. Overall tumor response was similar between the epoetin alfa and placebo groups after three chemotherapy cycles (72% and 67%, respectively; 95% CI of difference, -6% to 18%) and after completion of chemotherapy (60% and 56%, respectively; 95% CI of difference, -9% to 17%). Epoetin alfa and placebo groups had similar median overall survival (10.5 and 10.4 months, respectively) and overall mortality (91.7% and 87.8%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.172; 95% CI, 0.887 to 1.549; P = .264). Hemoglobin was maintained in the prechemotherapy range in epoetin alfa patients, but decreased substantially in placebo patients. Fewer epoetin alfa patients than placebo patients required transfusion.
                These results suggest that in newly diagnosed patients with SCLC epoetin alfa does not affect tumor response to chemotherapy or survival. However, the early trial closure makes these conclusions preliminary. We studied the clinical effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-huEPO) on anemia induced by two courses of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
                Seventy-two patients with NSCLC were randomized into three groups, receiving 100, or 200 IU/kg of r-huEPO, or placebo. The r-huEPO and placebo were administered subcutaneously three times a week for 6 weeks, starting 2 weeks after the initiation of chemotherapy.
                In the 53 evaluable patients, hemoglobin (Hb) levels at the nadir after the second cycle of chemotherapy were significantly elevated compared with the nadir after the first cycle in both r-huEPO treated groups, while this level was decreased in the placebo group. Hb levels at the end of the second course of chemotherapy (week 8) in both r-huEPO groups were higher than that in the placebo groups. No adverse drug reaction attributable to r-huEPO was observed. Serum erythropoietin levels after the administration of r-huEPO were higher than those after placebo administration.
                r-huEPO had an effect in preventing anemia in patients with NSCLC who had cisplatin-based chemotherapy. To evaluate the effects of epoetin alfa on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy.
                Women with hemoglobin concentrations ≤ 12.0 g/dl and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 0-3 were randomized 1:1 to receive epoetin alfa (10,000 IU 3 times weekly) or best standard care (BSC) during chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in the total anemia subscale assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) questionnaire after 12 weeks of treatment. The fatigue and nonfatigue subscales from the FACT-An, the Cancer Linear Analog Scale (CLAS), hemoglobin changes, ECOG PS score, tumor response, overall survival, and safety also were evaluated.
                Of 223 patients randomized, 216 constituted the modified intent-to-treat population. Percentage changes in the total anemia subscale of the FACT-An were significantly different between epoetin alfa treatment (14.2%) and BSC (-0.5%; p = .002), favoring epoetin alfa; so were changes in the FACT-An fatigue subscale (epoetin alfa, 17.5%; BSC, -0.9%; p = .003) and nonfatigue subscale (epoetin alfa, 8.8%; BSC, 0.2%; p = .008). Similar results were observed with the CLAS. Hemoglobin concentrations > 12 g/dl were more common with epoetin alfa (62.0%) than with BSC (27.6%). Tumor response, ECOG PS score, 12-month survival rate, and the incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between groups.
                Early intervention with epoetin alfa was well tolerated and improved anemia-related PROs in patients with breast cancer receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy. This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies. Patients (n = 344) with lymphoma or myeloma received darbepoetin alfa 2.25 microg/kg or placebo s.c., once weekly for 12 weeks. The percentage of patients achieving a haemoglobin response was significantly higher in the darbepoetin alfa group (60%) than in the placebo group (18%) (P < 0.001), regardless of baseline endogenous erythropoietin level. However, increased responsiveness was observed in patients with lower baseline erythropoietin levels. Darbepoetin alfa also resulted in higher mean changes in haemoglobin than placebo from baseline to the last value during the treatment phase (1.80 g/dl vs 0.19 g/dl) and after 12 weeks of treatment (2.66 g/dl vs 0.69 g/dl). A significantly lower percentage of patients in the darbepoetin alfa group received red blood cell transfusions than in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The efficacy of darbepoetin alfa was consistent for patients with lymphoma or myeloma. Improvements in quality of life were also observed with darbepoetin alfa. The overall safety profile of darbepoetin alfa was consistent with that expected for this patient population. Darbepoetin alfa significantly increased haemoglobin and reduced red blood cell transfusions in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies receiving chemotherapy. Darbepoetin alfa is a novel erythropoiesis-stimulating protein with a prolonged serum half-life. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study investigated the efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alfa in anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies who were receiving chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:2:2:1 ratio to receive darbepoetin alfa 1.0 microg/kg (n = 11), 2.25 microg/kg (n = 22), 4.5 microg/kg (n = 22) or placebo (n = 11), administered subcutaneously once weekly for 12 weeks. No dose increases were allowed during the study. A higher proportion of patients achieved a haemoglobin response (defined as a >/= 2.0 g/dl increase from baseline) in the darbepoetin alfa 1.0 microg/kg (45%), 2.25 microg/kg (55%) and 4.5 microg/kg (62%) groups than in the placebo group (10%; P < 0.01). The mean change in haemoglobin from baseline to week 13 was 1.56 g/dl in the 1.0 microg/kg group, 1.64 g/dl in the 2.25 microg/kg group and 2.46 g/dl in the 4.5 microg/kg group, compared with a mean change of 1.00 g/dl in the placebo group. The overall safety profile of darbepoetin alfa in this study was similar to that of placebo. These results show that darbepoetin alfa effectively and safely increased haemoglobin concentrations in patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies. Confirmative studies at doses of 2.25 and/or 4.5 microg/kg/week in this population are warranted. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety, efficacy and impact on quality of life of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) for cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). An open-labelled randomized design was used, with patients randomized to either treatment or control arms. Patients in the treatment arm received r-HuEPO given by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 200 units kg(-1) day(-1) plus oral iron supplements (ferrous sulphate 325 mg p.o. t.i.d.). Entry was restricted to patients with carcinoma of the lung, uterine cervix, prostate or breast who presented for RT with anaemia parameters reflective of 'the anaemia of chronic disease'. Radiotherapy policies (portals, doses, fraction size, etc.) were determined by the site and stage of disease. Complete blood counts (CBCs) were obtained weekly. The target level of haemoglobin was 15 g dl(-1) for men and 14 g dl(-1) for women. Quality of life (QOL) was assessed weekly by using an analogue scale to judge energy, activities of daily living and overall quality of life. Forty-eight patients were entered in the study, 24 in the treatment arm and 24 in the control arm. The prerandomization demographic characteristics and mean laboratory values were comparable in both arms. The mean haemoglobin at completion was 13.6 g dl(-1) for r-HuEPO-treated patients compared with 11.0 g dl(-1) for control subjects (P = 0.0012). Patients who received r-HuEPO demonstrated a mean weekly haemoglobin increase of 0.41 g dl(-1) compared with a decrease in mean haemoglobin level in controls for 6 of the 7 weeks of the study (mean weekly decrease of 0.073 g dl(-1)). Target levels of haemoglobin were achieved by 41.6% of r-HuEPO-treated patients compared with none of the control subjects. The mean platelet count declined in both arms of the study with RT but the decline from pretreatment was less rapid in r-HuEPO-treated patients (11.2% decrease) compared with controls (26.3% decrease) and was statistically significant during weeks 4-6. Toxicity was minor with only mild irritation at the injection site. Mean quality of life end points were superior in the treatment arm but not statistically significant. r-HuEPO had a beneficial effect on weekly haemoglobin levels in patients undergoing RT with response rates similar to other studies. There was also a less rapid decline in weekly platelet counts in r-HuEPO-treated patients compared with control subjects. Further studies are needed to address the optimum dose and scheduling as well as the impact of r-HuEPO on clinical outcomes. Platinum compounds are commonly associated with significant anemia. Erythropoietin administration has been found effective in correcting anemia in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy. We conducted a randomized, open label study to assess the efficacy of erythropoietin in preventing transfusions and significant anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dl) in patients with solid tumors receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
                One hundred forty-four patients with hemoglobin <13 g/dl were included in this study (72 in each arm). Patients in the treatment arm received 10,000 U of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) thrice weekly s.c. during platinum-based chemotherapy, while patients in the control arm received no treatment.
                All patients were evaluable for efficacy. Transfusions were reduced by the administration of rHuEPO (15.3 vs. 33.3%, p = 0.019), and fewer patients developed significant anemia (16.6 vs. 45.8%, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that patients with observed to predicted (O/P) serum erythropoietin levels <or=0.9 and responders to chemotherapy benefited from erythropoietin administration in contrast to patients with O/P >0.9 or non-responders.
                rHuEPO at a dose of 10,000 U thrice weekly prevents transfusions and development of significant anemia in patients with solid tumors receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
                Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel INTRODUCTION: Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) is used to treat symptomatic anaemia due to chemotherapy. A new r-HuEPO, Epoetin theta (Eporatio®), was investigated and compared to placebo in a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in adult cancer patients receiving nonplatinum-based chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the responder rate (complete haemoglobin (Hb) response, i.e., Hb increase ≥2 g/dl) without the benefit of a transfusion within the previous 4 weeks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: 186 patients were randomised to s.c. treatment for 12 weeks with either Epoetin theta (N = 95) or placebo (N = 91). The starting dose was 20,000 IU once weekly Epoetin theta or placebo. RESULTS: The incidence of complete Hb responders was significantly higher in the Epoetin theta group than in the placebo group (72.6 vs. 25.3%, P < 0.0001). More patients in the placebo group than in the Epoetin theta group received blood transfusions after randomisation (23 patients, 25.3% vs. 13 patients, 13.7%, P = 0.0277). The majority of patients with a complete Hb response had 20,000 IU/week as their maximum dose prior to response, indicating that a dose of 20,000 IU is an appropriate starting dose. The overall frequencies of adverse events (AEs) were similar in both treatment groups. Hypertension was the only AE that was more frequent in the Epoetin theta group compared to the placebo group (8.4 vs. 1.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Epoetin theta showed a superior efficacy to placebo in terms of complete Hb response without blood transfusion within the previous 4 weeks. Treatment with Epoetin theta resulted in a statistically significant increase in mean haemoglobin levels compared to placebo. The overall frequencies of adverse events were similar in both treatment groups. To determine whether epoetin alfa reduces anemia-related fatigue, improves other aspects of health-related patient-recorded outcomes (PROs), reduces the number of RBC transfusions, and has an impact on freedom from treatment failure (FFTF) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL).
                The prospectively randomized HD15EPO study performed by the German Hodgkin Study Group investigated epoetin alfa administered at doses of 40,000 U weekly during and after chemotherapy (six to eight cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [BEACOPP]) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled setting. The study accrued 1,379 patients, of whom 1,328 were assessable for safety, 1,303 were assessable for clinical outcome, and 930 were assessable for PROs.
                PROs were not different in patients receiving placebo or epoetin alfa, both after the end of chemotherapy and 6 months thereafter. There was no difference between patients treated with epoetin alfa or placebo with respect to FFTF and OS. There were also no differences in the numbers of deaths, progressions, relapses, and thromboembolic events. The median number of RBC transfusions was reduced from four per patient in the placebo group to two per patient in the epoetin alfa group (P < .001), with 27.4% of patients needing no RBC transfusion in the placebo group compared with 36.7% of patients in the epoetin alfa group (P < .001).
                Epoetin alfa administered at 40,000 U weekly parallel to BEACOPP chemotherapy was safe in patients with advanced-stage HL and reduced the number of RBC transfusions but had no impact on fatigue and other PRO domains. The efficacy and safety of darbepoetin alpha (DA) for treating patients with active cancer and anemia not receiving or planning to receive cytotoxic chemotherapy or myelosuppressive radiotherapy was evaluated.
                Patients with active cancer and anemia not receiving or planning to receive chemotherapy or radiotherapy were enrolled onto a phase III, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study and administered placebo or DA 6.75 microg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W) for up to 16 weeks with a 2-year follow-up for survival. Patients who completed 16 weeks of treatment could receive the same treatment as randomized Q4W for an additional 16 weeks. The primary end point was all occurrences of transfusions from weeks 5 through 17; safety end points included incidence of adverse events and survival.
                The incidence of transfusions between weeks 5 and 17 was lower in the DA group but was not statistically significantly different from that of placebo. DA was associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular and thromboembolic events and more deaths during the initial 16-week treatment period. Long-term survival data demonstrated statistically significantly poorer survival in patients treated with DA versus placebo (P = .022). This effect varied by baseline covariates including, sex, tumor type, and geographic region; statistical significance diminished (P = .12) when the analysis was adjusted for baseline imbalances or known prognostic factors.
                DA was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in transfusions. Shorter survival was observed in the DA arm; thus, this study does not support the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in this subset of patients with anemia of cancer. Darbepoetin alfa is effective in treating chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA). Administration of subcutaneous darbepoetin alfa every 3 weeks (Q3W) could simplify treatment through synchronization with common Q3W chemotherapy regimens. We report results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa in patients with a wide variety of tumor types who experienced CIA.
                Patients aged > or = 18 years with anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dL) being treated for nonmyeloid malignancy were randomized 1:1 to receive darbepoetin alfa 300 microg (n = 193) or placebo (n = 193) subcutaneously Q3W from weeks 1 to 13 in this 16-week study. Doses could be adjusted per prespecified rules.
                The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who received > or =1 red blood cell (RBC) transfusion between week 5 and the end of the treatment period (EOTP). The study also analyzed the proportions of patients achieving a hemoglobin concentration > or =11 g/dL and subsequently maintaining hemoglobin levels above 11 g/dL, and the change in hemoglobin concentration over time.
                The proportion of patients requiring RBC transfusions between week 5 and EOTP was significantly lower in the darbepoetin alfa-treated group than in the placebo-treated group (24 vs. 41% of patients, a 16.3% difference, p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two treatment arms in quality-of-life measures. Cardiovascular/thromboembolic adverse events were uncommon and were not associated with increases in hemoglobin levels. Study limitations suggest caution in the interpretation of these results: transfusions, the primary endpoint, were recommended but not required if hemoglobin concentrations were < or =8.0 g/dL, and protocol deviations (primarily dosing errors) occurred in approximately one-half of the patients in both treatment groups.
                In this study, fixed-dose Q3W darbepoetin alfa appeared to be well-tolerated and effective for the treatment of CIA.
                Study 20030232; ClinicalTrials.Gov Identifier: NCT00110955. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial assessed the effects of epoetin alfa on transfusion requirements, hematopoietic parameters, quality of life (QOL), and safety in anemic cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy. The study also explored a possible relationship between increased hemoglobin and survival.
                Three hundred seventy-five patients with solid or nonmyeloid hematologic malignancies and hemoglobin levels < or = 10.5 g/dL, or greater than 10.5 g/dL but < or = 12.0 g/dL after a hemoglobin decrease of > or = 1.5 g/dL per cycle since starting chemotherapy, were randomized 2:1 to epoetin alfa 150 to 300 IU/kg (n = 251) or placebo (n = 124) three times per week subcutaneously for 12 to 24 weeks. The primary end point was proportion of patients transfused; secondary end points were change in hemoglobin and QOL. The protocol was amended before unblinding to prospectively collect and assess survival data 12 months after the last patient completed the study.
                Epoetin alfa, compared with placebo, significantly decreased transfusion requirements (P =.0057) and increased hemoglobin (P <.001). Improvement of all primary cancer- and anemia-specific QOL domains, including energy level, ability to do daily activities, and fatigue, was significantly (P <.01) greater for epoetin alfa versus placebo patients. Although the study was not powered for survival as an end point, Kaplan-Meier estimates showed a trend in overall survival favoring epoetin alfa (P =.13, log-rank test), and Cox regression analysis showed an estimated hazards ratio of 1.309 (P =.052) favoring epoetin alfa. Adverse events were comparable between groups.
                Epoetin alfa safely and effectively ameliorates anemia and significantly improves QOL in cancer patients receiving nonplatinum chemotherapy. Encouraging results regarding increased survival warrant another trial designed to confirm these findings. Patients with ovarian cancer often experience dose-limiting myelotoxicity, nephrotoxicity and anemia following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.
                To investigate the ability of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin alfa) to prevent the development of anemia, 30 patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma receiving cisplatin or carboplatin were randomly assigned to treatment with subcutaneous epoetin alfa 300 IU/kg three times a week in addition to conventional supportive treatment, or conventional supportive treatment alone, for up to six chemotherapy cycles. The dose of epoetin alfa was reduced if hemoglobin concentration exceeded 15 g/dL.
                A highly significant difference in mean hemoglobin concentrations was observed between the two groups during the first cycle of chemotherapy due to a significant decrease in mean hemoglobin concentration in the control group. A maximal difference of 3.4 g/dL was achieved during cycle three. Fewer patients required blood or platelet transfusions in the epoetin alfa-treated group, although the difference was not significant compared to the control group. Epoetin alfa was well tolerated.
                Epoetin alfa appears to be effective and well tolerated in preventing hemoglobin decline in patients undergoing aggressive cyclic platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced ovarian carcinoma. To evaluate the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) on the haemoglobin level and transfusion requirement in low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), 87 patients were enrolled in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, 44 patients were assigned to epoetin alpha (150 U/kg/d s.c. for 8 weeks) and 43 to placebo arms. MDS types were homogenous in both groups: refractory anaemia (RA) 47.7-48.8%. refractory anaemia with ringed sideroblasts (RAS) 20.5-25.6%, refractory anaemia with excess of blasts (RAEB) (blasts < 10%) 31.8-25.6%, 14/38 evaluable patients responded to epoetin alpha versus 4/37 to placebo (P=0.007). 50% of RA responded to epoetin alpha versus 5.9% to placebo (P=0.0072), RAS 37.5% v 18.2% (P=0.6) and RAEB 16.7% v 11.1% (P=1.00). 60% of non-pretransfused patients responded to epoetin alpha (Hb 8.35< or = 0.73 to 10.07+/-1.87 g/dl), whereas a slight decrease was observed in the placebo group (8.4+/-0.66 to 8.19+/-0.92 g/dl) (P=0.0004). Percentage of transfused patients was similar in both arms. Basal erythropoietin (Epo) serum levels > 200 mU/l predicted for a non-response. At week 4 sTfR levels were increased > 50% in responders (P=0.013), whereas an increase < 18% predicted for non-response (P=0.006). Leucocyte and platelet counts were not influenced by epoetin alpha treatment. Adverse events occurred in 31.8% of the rHuEpo-treated versus 42.99%) of the placebo-treated patients (P=0.2), and seven patients did not complete the course. In conclusion, rHuEpo was effective in the treatment of low-risk MDS. RA subtype, no transfusions prior to rHuEpo therapy, and low basal Epo levels were associated with higher probability of response. Soluble transferrin receptor level at the fourth week was an early predictor of response. Patients receiving chemotherapy often develop anemia. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp(TM)) is an erythropoiesis-stimulating glycoprotein that has been shown, in dose-finding studies, to be safe and clinically active when administered to patients with cancer every 1, 2, or 3 weeks. This phase III study compared the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa with placebo in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy.
                In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 320 anemic patients (hemoglobin <or=11.0 g/dL) were randomly assigned to receive darbepoetin alfa or placebo injections weekly for 12 weeks. The 297 patients who completed at least the first 28 days of study were assessed for red blood cell transfusions, the primary endpoint. Patients were also assessed for hemoglobin concentration (i.e., hematopoietic response), adverse events, antibody formation to darbepoetin alfa, hospitalizations, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)-Fatigue score, and disease outcome. Efficacy endpoints were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox proportional hazards analyses, and chi-square tests where appropriate. All statistical tests were two-sided.
                Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa required fewer transfusions (27% versus 52%; mean difference = 25%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 14% to 36%; P<.001), required fewer units of blood (0.67 versus 1.92; mean difference = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.65 to 1.84; P<.001), had more hematopoietic responses (66% versus 24%; mean difference = 42%; 95% CI = 31% to 53%; P<.001), and had better improvement in FACT-Fatigue scores (56% versus 44% overall improvement; 32% versus 19% with >or=25% improvement; mean difference = 13%; 95% CI = 2% to 23%, P =.019) than patients receiving placebo. Patients receiving darbepoetin alfa did not appear to have any untoward effect in disease outcome and did not develop antibodies to the drug. Adverse events were similar between the groups.
                Patients with chemotherapy-associated anemia can safely and effectively be treated with weekly darbepoetin alfa therapy. Darbepoetin alfa decreased blood transfusion requirements, increased hemoglobin concentration, and decreased fatigue. Although no conclusions can be drawn about survival from this study, the potential salutary effect on disease outcome warrants further investigation in a prospectively designed study. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the effect of darbepoetin alfa on hospitalization days, transfusion requirements, hemoglobin levels, and fatigue in patients with anemia of cancer (AOC). Eligible patients were anemic (hemoglobin <or=11 g/dl) due to cancer, >or=18 years old, and had not received chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks of study screening. Patients were randomized 4:1 to receive darbepoetin alfa, 3.0 microg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W) (n = 226), or observation only for 12 weeks (n = 59), followed by an optional 9 weeks of darbepoetin alfa, 3.0 microg/kg Q2W. Endpoints were compared between the two treatment arms at week 13. A planned interim analysis indicated that assumptions regarding hospitalization in the study design were incorrect, so the study was terminated early. Therefore, results for the primary endpoint should be interpreted cautiously. The hospitalization rate was similar (0.5 days) for both the darbepoetin alfa and observation groups (p = .73). Transfusion incidence (weeks 5-12) was significantly lower for darbepoetin alfa patients (8%) than for observation patients (22%) (p = .0092). By week 13, hemoglobin increased by 2.1 g/dl in patients receiving darbepoetin alfa, compared with 0.1 g/dl in the observation group p < .0001. Hemoglobin improvements were paralleled by an increase in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue score (mean change in score at week 13: darbepoetin alfa, 6.0; observation, 2.2; p < .05). Darbepoetin alfa Q2W can significantly improve hemoglobin levels and reduce transfusion requirements in patients with AOC, resulting in significant improvements in health-related quality of life. To investigate the effect of recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin beta) on anemia, transfusion need, and quality of life (QOL) in severely anemic patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), or multiple myeloma (MM).
                Transfusion-dependent patients with NHL (n = 106), CLL (n = 126), or MM (n = 117) and a low serum erythropoietin concentration were randomized to receive epoetin beta 150 IU/kg or placebo subcutaneously three times a week for 16 weeks. Primary efficacy criteria were transfusion-free and transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival (hemoglobin [Hb] > 8.5 g/dL) between weeks 5 to 16. Response was defined as an increase in Hb > or = 2 g/dL with elimination of transfusion need. QOL was assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale.
                Transfusion-free (P =.0012) survival and transfusion- and severe anemia-free survival (P =.0001) were significantly greater in the epoetin beta group versus placebo (Wald chi(2) test), giving a relative risk reduction of 43% and 51%, respectively. The response rate was 67% and 27% in the epoetin beta versus the placebo group, respectively (P <.0001). After 12 and 16 weeks of treatment, QOL significantly improved in the epoetin beta group compared with placebo (P <.05); this improvement correlated with an increase in Hb concentration (> or = 2 g/dL). A target Hb that could be generally recommended could not be identified.
                Many severely anemic and transfusion-dependent patients with advanced MM, NHL, and CLL and a low performance status benefited from epoetin therapy, with elimination of severe anemia and transfusion need, and improvement in QOL. To expand on our experience with the combination of paclitaxel, fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and twice daily irradiation (T-FHX) and to assess the impact of weekly administration of erythropoietin (r-HuEpo) on transfusion requirements, we conducted a Phase II multi-institutional trial with a simplified 1-h paclitaxel infusion schedule and randomized patients to receive weekly doses of r-HuEpo.
                A total of 90 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers (stage IV, 96%; N(2)/N(3), 66%) were treated on a regimen of 1-h infusion of paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)/day, day 1), 120-h infusion of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m(2)/day, days 0-5); hydroxyurea 500 mg p.o. every 12 h for 11 doses; and radiation 150cGy bid, days 1-5 of each 14-day cycle repeated for five cycles over 10 weeks (7200-7500 cGy). Before initiating therapy, patients were randomized to receive r-HuEpo 40,000 IU s.c. once weekly.
                At median follow-up of 40 months, 3-year progression-free survival is 62%, locoregional control is 84%, and systemic control is 79%. Overall survival is 59%. Anemia, leucopenia, dermatitis, and mucositis were the most frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Patients randomized to erythropoietin experienced less grade 2/3 anemia (52 versus 77%; P = 0.02), but transfusion requirements were not significantly different.
                T-FHX is an active and tolerable regimen inducing local tumor control and promising survival with organ preservation in high-risk patients. One h infusion of paclitaxel simplified the regimen without compromising efficacy. Addition of erythropoietin does not reduce the need for transfusion with this nonplatinum-containing regimen. T-FHX should be advanced to a randomized trial and compared with a cisplatin-based concomitant regimen. This dose-finding, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa administered every 3 weeks (Q3W) to anaemic patients receiving chemotherapy. In part A, patients (haemoglobin </=110 g/l) were randomised in a 1:4 ratio to receive 1 of 6 doses of darbepoetin alfa (4.5, 6.75, 9.0, 12.0, 13.5 and 15.0 microg/kg) or placebo Q3W for 12 weeks. In part B, patients received open-label darbepoetin alfa. Patients (n=249) were evaluated for safety, haemoglobin endpoints and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. Darbepoetin alfa given at doses ranging from 4.5 to 15.0 microg/kg Q3W was well tolerated and comparable to placebo in terms of safety. No neutralising antibodies were detected. All doses (from 4.5 to 15 microg/kg) reduced transfusions compared with placebo, and resulted in >50% of patients achieving a haematopoietic response. Administration of darbepoetin alfa Q3W has a tolerable safety profile and effectively ameliorates anaemia due to chemotherapy. To evaluate the effect on survival and quality of life of maintaining hemoglobin (Hb) in the range of 12 to 14 g/dL with epoetin alfa versus placebo in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) receiving first-line chemotherapy.
                Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive epoetin alfa 40,000 U once weekly or placebo for 12 months. Study drug was initiated if baseline Hb was < or = 13 g/dL or when Hb decreased to < or = 13g/dL during the study. The primary end point was 12-month overall survival (OS).
                The study drug administration was stopped early in accordance with a recommendation from the Independent Data Monitoring Committee because of higher mortality in the group treated with epoetin alfa. Enrollment had been completed, with 939 patients enrolled (epoetin alfa, n = 469; placebo, n = 470). Most patients had Hb more than 12 g/dL at baseline (median Hb, 12.8 g/dL) or during the study. From the final analysis, 12-month OS was 70% for epoetin alfa recipients and 76% for placebo recipients (P = .01). Optimal tumor response and time to disease progression were similar between groups. The reason for the difference in mortality between groups could not be determined from additional subsequent analyses involving both study data and chart review.
                In this trial, the use of epoetin alfa to maintain high Hb targets in women with MBC, most of whom did not have anemia at the start of treatment, was associated with decreased survival. Additional research is required to clarify the potential impact of erythropoietic agents on survival when the Hb target range is 10 to 12 g/dL. Patients undergoing chemotherapy for treatment of malignancy frequently experience clinically significant anemia. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy impairs erythropoiesis, which may not fully recover between treatment cycles. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) has been effectively introduced in anemic patients suffering from chronic renal failure. The present study was designed to assess, first, whether rHuEPO treatment decreases transfusion requirements in chemotherapy-induced anemia and, second, whether high-dose rHuEPO application is safe. STUDY DESIGN and
                Thirty consecutive anemic patients (hemoglobin <11 g/dl) receiving combination chemotherapy for primary malignant bone tumors were studied in a prospective, double-blind, randomized, Phase III trial. Patients received chemotherapy according to one of two German protocols, depending on histologic diagnosis. All subjects enrolled were randomly assigned either to receive 600 IU of rHuEPO per kg of body weight intravenously twice a week or to receive a placebo during chemotherapy. To obtain comparable data, an observation period of 20 weeks was chosen. Twenty-nine patients fulfilled the criteria and were eligible for statistical evaluation.
                Transfusion requirements were significantly decreased from Week 8 of therapy (p<0.05) in the treatment group. Therapeutic benefits were even more evident with continuation of therapy (Week 12, p = 0.03; Week 16, p = 0.016; Week 20, p = 0.002). The blood required was 2.1 units of red cells in the treatment group and 8.4 units of red cells in the placebo group. All patients tolerated rHuEPO with no serious side effects.
                These findings suggest that rHuEPO is an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option for decreasing the transfusion requirements in chemotherapy-induced anemia. Recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) corrects cancer-related anemia and, thereby, improves quality of life. The purpose of the present study was to measure the impact of erythropoietin on hemoglobin and mood state in patients with metastatic breast cancer and mild anemia (Hgb < 12.0 g/dL). Women were randomized to receive usual care (G1) or usual care plus r-HuEPO (G2). Usual care included transfusions as necessary and fatigue education. R-HuEPO was begun at 40,000U subcutaneously per week. At 4 weeks, the dose was increased to 60,000U if Hgb had not increased > or = 1.0 g/dL. The drug was discontinued at 8 weeks if hemoglobin improvement was < 1.0 g/dL. The study was terminated early (n = 27, G1 = 13, G2 = 14) when 4/14 (28.5%) subjects in G2 developed thrombotic events (deep vein thrombosis [DVT] in 1; DVT plus pulmonary embolism [PE] in 1; DVT plus PE 1 month after drug discontinuation in 1; and brachial vein thrombosis with infected Mediport in 1). In all four patients, Hgb levels were normal at the time of the event. No patient in G1 developed a thrombotic event. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics or current chemotherapy regimen in G1 vs. G2. The decision to terminate the trial was made after considerable deliberation. The increased incidence of thrombotic events in the r-HuEPO (G2) arm of this study exceeds that in prior studies in this population and prior r-HuEPO trials. This may relate to the administration of r-HuEPO in this high-risk population, but the small sample size and possible predisposing risk factors preclude definitive conclusions. Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) represents an attractive alternative to red blood cell (RBC) transfusions for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anaemia. This prospective, controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of rHuEPO in reducing RBC transfusion requirements in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy.
                Patients with histologically proven malignancies, haemoglobin (Hb) values <10.5 g/dl, and receiving platinum-based chemotherapy were randomised to either 150 IU/kg of rHuEPO subcutaneously (s.c.) x3/week (group A), or simple follow-up plus RBC transfusions upon indication (group B). All patients received 200mg of elementary iron (Fe) daily.
                A total of 47 patients were randomised to either group A (n=24) or the control group B (n=23). There was a statistically significant increase of Hb (p <0.0002) and haematocrit (Ht) (p <0.002) in group A patients compared to the control group B. The levels of Hb in group A patients increased significantly with each chemotherapy cycle number. There was a statistically significant (p <0.04) difference in the number of transfusions between the two groups, with only 37.5% of group A patients requiring a RBC transfusion at any time during the study, compared to all patients (100%) in group B.
                Administration of rHuEPO is an effective intervention for the management of chemotherapy-induced anaemia, significantly reducing RBC transfusion requirements in patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Hb and Ht levels proved reliable indicators for response to rHuEPO treatment. To assess whether the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) would increase the hematocrit, reduce the requirement for transfusion, and improve the quality of life in anemic cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive, cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
                One hundred thirty-two anemic cancer patients receiving cyclic, cisplatin-containing, myelosuppressive chemotherapy were evaluated. Patients received either r-HuEPO (150 U/kg) or placebo, subcutaneously, three times a week for 3 months. Responses were assessed by measuring changes in hemoglobin/hematocrit, transfusion requirement, and quality of life.
                The mean hematocrit increased by 6.0 percentage points in the r-HuEPO group versus 1.3 in the placebo group. A decrease in transfusion requirement did not reach significance over all 3 months, but there was a significant reduction in the percentage of patients transfused in the second and third months (27% r-HuEPO vs. 56% placebo) and a trend toward reduction in the mean total number of units transfused (1.20 units r-HuEPO vs. 2.02 units placebo), suggesting a lag of 1 month before r-HuEPO can affect the transfusion requirement. Pretreatment serum erythropoietin levels were lower in responders than in nonresponders (73.5 IU/L and 86.3 IU/L means, respectively). However, the magnitude of this difference was not helpful in defining which patients were likely to respond. There was a significant improvement in overall quality of life between the two treatment arms in favor of the r-HuEPO-treated group. There were no significant adverse effects associated with r-HuEPO.
                r-HuEPO is safe and can cause a significant improvement in the hematocrit and quality of life of anemic cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive, cisplatin-based chemotherapy. After 1 month of r-HuEPO, there is also a reduction in transfusion requirement. In order to examine the influence of erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on serum hemoglobin levels, transfusion requirements, and quality of life in patients with gynecologic malignancies under polychemotherapy and chronic tumor anemia (hemoglobin <11 g/dl), we performed a prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial. Between October 1992 and October 1993, 35 patients from 5 gynecologic departments were entered into this trial. Inclusion criteria were hemoglobin level <11 g/dl, ferritin level >29 ng/ml, stool negative for occult blood, and life expectancy for more than 3 months. Patients received either 150 U/kg body wt rHuEPO (Erypo by Cilag-Janssen) sc three times a week for 12 weeks (n = 23) or a placebo (n = 12). If the hemoglobin levels of the 4th, 8th, or 12th week were >2 g/dl above the baseline value and/or >12 g/dl, the patient was classified as a responder. Patients who required blood transfusions (hemoglobin <8 g/dl, erythrocytes <3 x 10(6)/ml, or clinical symptoms of anemia) were classified as nonresponders. A nonvalidated quality of life questionnaire was completed by the patient at the beginning of the treatment and then every fourth week before receiving chemotherapy. In the rHuEPO group 56.6% of the patients responded to the treatment (chi2 = 10.79, P = 0.001) and only 5 patients (21.7%) required blood transfusions, whereas 8 of 12 patients in the placebo group (66.6%) had to be transfused (chi2 = 6.81, P = 0.009). Quality of life did not differ significantly between the rHuEPO group and the placebo group of patients. Within the rHuEPO group those patients that responded showed a significant increase in physical activity after response in comparison to the preresponsive phase (P = 0.02, paired t test). We therefore concluded that rHuEPO significantly increases serum hemoglobin levels and decreases transfusions requirements while maintaining quality of life in patients with gynecological malignancies who are undergoing polychemotherapy. This open-label, randomized phase III study was designed to investigate the effects of erythropoietin alfa (EPO) in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy (CRT) in patients with stage IB to II cervical cancer who had undergone radical hysterectomy.
                Two hundred fifty-seven patients were randomly assigned to four cycles of carboplatin/ifosfamide chemotherapy followed by external-beam pelvic radiotherapy (CRT group) or four cycles of carboplatin/ifosfamide chemotherapy and EPO followed by pelvic radiotherapy and EPO (CRT + EPO group). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), change in hemoglobin levels, and safety, including thromboembolic events.
                The estimated 5-year RFS rates were 78% for patients receiving CRT + EPO and 70% for patients receiving CRT. There was no statistically significant difference in RFS, although a trend favoring patients treated with CRT + EPO was observed (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.12; log-rank P = .06). Exploratory analyses suggest a benefit with CRT + EPO for patients with stage IB to IIA disease (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.85; P = .014) or patients with complete resection (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.98; P = .039). OS was similar in both groups (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.50; log-rank P = .63). Patients treated with EPO maintained higher hemoglobin levels throughout CRT. No significant differences in safety profiles were observed between the two groups. Incidence of thrombovascular events was low (2%) and comparable between both groups.
                This study confirms that EPO can be added safely to CRT in patients with cervical cancer, but it failed to demonstrate a significant benefit in RFS and OS. Darbepoetin alfa is an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) approved for treating chemotherapy-induced anemia. This phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined the efficacy of darbepoetin alfa for treating anemia of cancer (AoC) in patients not receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Patients were randomized 3:1 to receive darbepoetin alfa (6.75 microg/kg) or placebo every 4 weeks; the end of the study was at week 17. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with a hematopoietic response. Secondary endpoints included transfusion incidence and safety parameters. Efficacy analyses were performed on 162 patients in the darbepoetin alfa group and 56 patients in the placebo group. The Kaplan-Meier percentages of patients who achieved a hematopoietic response (darbepoetin alfa, 69%; placebo, 24%) or achieved the target hemoglobin (darbepoetin alfa, 85%; placebo, 50%) differed significantly between treatment groups. The transfusion incidence did not differ between treatment groups probably because of the low baseline transfusion rates in AoC patients. The incidence of adverse events (including on-study deaths) was similar in both groups. In conclusion, darbepoetin alfa appeared to be well tolerated and significantly increased hemoglobin levels in these AoC study patients. This work was conducted to evaluate the effect of early intervention with epoetin alfa (EPO) on transfusion requirements, hemoglobin level (Hb), quality of life (QOL) and to explore a possible relationship between the use of EPO and survival, in patients with solid tumors receiving platinum-based chemotherapy. Three hundred and sixteen patients with Hb12.1g/dL were randomised 2:1 to EPO 10000 IU thrice weekly subcutaneously (n = 211) or best supportive care (BSC) (n = 105). The primary end point was proportion of patients transfused while secondary end points were changes in Hb and QOL. The protocol was amended before the first patient was recruited to also prospectively collect survival data. EPO therapy significantly decreased transfusion requirements (P < 0.001) and increased Hb (P < 0.005). EPO-treated patients had significantly improved QOL compared with BSC patients (P < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed no differences in 12-month survival (P = 0.39), despite a significantly greater number of patients with metastatic disease in the EPO group (78% vs. 61%, P = 0.001). EPO was well tolerated. This study has shown that early intervention with EPO can result in a significant reduction of transfusion requirements and increases in Hb and QOL in patients with mild anemia during platinum-based chemotherapy. Effects of epoetin alfa on transfusions, haemoglobin (Hb) and quality of life (QOL) were evaluated in a placebo-controlled study of 145 patients with multiple myeloma and anaemia (Hb < 11 g/dl). During the 12-week, double-blind phase, patients received 150 IU/kg epoetin alfa or a matching volume of placebo subcutaneously three times weekly; the dose (or volume) was doubled at week 4 if Hb response was inadequate. Patients completing this phase could enter the subsequent optional 12-week phase of open-label epoetin alfa treatment. During double-blind treatment, epoetin alfa significantly decreased the incidence of transfusion compared with placebo (28% vs. 47%, P = 0.017), regardless of patients' transfusion history, and increased mean Hb (1.8 g/dl vs. 0.0 g/dl, P < 0.001). Univariate analysis showed significant (P </= 0.05) improvement in more QOL measures with epoetin alfa than with placebo; multivariate analysis discerned no between-treatment differences. Significantly (P = 0.038) more epoetin alfa vs. placebo patients had improved performance scores. At the end of the open-label treatment phase, patients who had continued epoetin alfa maintained Hb status, and placebo patients who were switched to epoetin alfa had mean Hb increases of 2.4 g/dl. Adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Epoetin alfa proved effective and well tolerated for treating anaemia in patients with multiple myeloma. To evaluate the effect of epoetin alfa on local disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer treatment-related anemia and fatigue in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radical radiotherapy with curative intent.
                Patients (N = 301) with hemoglobin (Hb) less than 15 g/dL were randomly assigned in a ratio of 1:1 to receive radiotherapy plus epoetin alfa (10,000 U subcutaneously [SC] three times weekly if baseline Hb was < 12.5 g/dL; 4,000 U SC three times weekly if baseline Hb > or = 12.5 g/dL) or radiotherapy alone. Hb levels were monitored weekly. The primary end point was local DFS, defined as the time from random assignment to local disease recurrence or death. Secondary efficacy end points included OS, local tumor response, and local tumor control. Patients were followed at 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks postradiotherapy and annually for 5 years. Cancer treatment-related anemia and fatigue were evaluated with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck. Adverse events were recorded up to 12 weeks postradiotherapy.
                Hb levels increased from baseline with epoetin alfa. The median duration of local DFS was not statistically different between groups (observation, 35.42 months; epoetin alfa, 31.47 months; hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.41). Groups did not significantly differ in DFS, OS, tumor outcomes, or cancer treatment-related anemia or fatigue. No new or unexpected adverse events were observed.
                Addition of epoetin alfa to radical radiotherapy did not affect survival, tumor outcomes, anemia, or fatigue positively or negatively in patients with head and neck cancer.
ESAs reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions but increase the risk for thromboembolic events and deaths. There is suggestive evidence that ESAs may improve QoL. Whether and how ESAs affects tumour control remains uncertain. The increased risk of death and thromboembolic events should be balanced against the potential benefits of ESA treatment taking into account each patient’s clinical circumstances and preferences. More data are needed for the effect of these drugs on quality of life and tumour progression. Further research is needed to clarify cellular and molecular mechanisms and pathways of the effects of ESAs on thrombogenesis and their potential effects on tumour growth.