Efficacy, safety, and effects on quality of life of salmeterol versus albuterol in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Comparison of powder and aerosol formulations of salmeterol in the treatment of asthma. Salmeterol powder compared with albuterol aerosol as maintenance therapy for asthma in adolescent and adult patients. Salmeterol xinafoate in asthmatic patients under consideration for maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy. UK Study Group. Salmeterol improves quality of life in patients with asthma requiring inhaled corticosteroids. Salmeterol Quality of Life Study Group. A comparison of salmeterol with albuterol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma. A twelve-week comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma: a Canadian multicenter study. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Long-acting beta2-agonist monotherapy vs continued therapy with inhaled corticosteroids in patients with persistent asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder pharmacotherapy in adolescent and adult patients with chronic persistent asthma: a randomized clinical trial. Efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of salmeterol in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol HFA 134A MDI in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Salmeterol compared with current therapies in chronic asthma. Efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol administered twice daily via hydrofluoroalkane 134a metered-dose inhaler in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study. Efficacy of salmeterol xinafoate powder in children with chronic persistent asthma. Effect of long-term salmeterol therapy compared with as-needed albuterol use on airway hyperresponsiveness.
Salmeterol xinafoate is a long-acting, highly selective, beta2-adrenergic agonist that produces bronchodilation and clinically significant improvement in pulmonary function for up to 12 hours in patients with asthma.
                To evaluate the impact on asthma-specific quality of life, efficacy, and safety of salmeterol versus albuterol in adult patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
                A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 539 adult asthma patients over 12 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol 42 microg via metered-dose inhaler twice daily or albuterol 180 microg four times daily. Upon entry into the study, 46% of patients were being treated with an inhaled corticosteroid and were allowed to continue treatment throughout the study. Pulmonary function and asthma symptoms were monitored daily, and patients completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.
                Treatment with salmeterol twice daily produced significantly greater improvements from baseline in all quality of life domain ("Activity Limitation," "Asthma Symptoms," "Emotional Function," "Environmental Exposure") scores and in the global AQLQ score at 12 weeks (P < or = .038) compared with albuterol treatment four times daily. Pulmonary function and asthma symptoms were also significantly improved with salmeterol compared with albuterol.
                Salmeterol 42 microg administered twice daily is significantly more effective than albuterol 180 microg four times daily for improving asthma-specific quality of life, controlling asthma symptoms, and improving pulmonary function in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Furthermore, those improvements were maintained over a 12-week period. The efficacy and safety of the aerosol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) formulation of salmeterol for asthma symptoms have been established. Recently, salmeterol has been introduced as a micronized powder formulation administered via a breath-activated multidose powder inhaler (Diskus).
                A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study involving 498 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus, salmeterol aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, and placebo.
                Patients were randomized to one of the three treatment groups for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over 12 hours, daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), self-rated asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by monitoring vital signs, electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring, and occurrence of adverse events.
                As compared with placebo, both salmeterol powder and aerosol produced significant improvement in FEV1 and PEF and decreased nighttime awakenings and supplemental albuterol use. There were no significant differences in the efficacy of the two salmeterol formulations. The magnitude of improvement in pulmonary function was undiminished over the 12-week study. Both formulations of salmeterol were well tolerated, with safety profiles not significantly different from placebo.
                Results of this study indicate that salmeterol, administered either as a powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus or as an aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, produces clinically significant and comparable improvement in pulmonary function and is well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. Two multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled studies involving 451 adolescent and adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma compared the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 micrograms twice daily with albuterol 180 micrograms four times daily or placebo (with albuterol as needed) for 12 weeks. Patients had forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 50% to 80%. Throughout the 12-week treatment period, the mean change from baseline in percentage of predicted FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with placebo; mean area under the curve for FEV1 was significantly greater with salmeterol than with albuterol or placebo. Significant improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, percentage of nights without awakening, and asthma symptoms were observed with salmeterol. Salmeterol was well tolerated, and no clinically significant changes in electrocardiographic activity were observed. In severe chronic asthma, long-term oral steroids may be necessary to control symptoms. In patients in whom such treatment was under consideration, the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate 100 micrograms b.i.d. was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group, multicentre study. One hundred and nineteen chronic symptomatic asthmatics were randomized to receive either salmeterol, 100 micrograms b.i.d. (n = 55; baseline % predicted morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 59%; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 66%) or placebo (n = 64; baseline % predicted morning PEF 63%; FEV1 66%) both via the Diskhaler. Morning and evening PEF and asthma symptoms were recorded in daily record booklets by the patient over a 12 week period. A significant improvement in morning PEF was achieved after 1 month in the salmeterol treated group; this persisted throughout the treatment period (estimated treatment difference 22 L.min-1). There was a significant increase in the proportion of symptom-free nights experienced by the salmeterol treated group (33 (SD 32) %) compared with placebo (13 (26) %), and a significant decrease in daily use of relief medication (mean decrease 5.1 (4.7) doses per day with salmeterol, 2.5 (4.0) doses with placebo). Both treatments were well-tolerated, with no evidence of any difference in the side-effects associated with beta 2-agonists. In conclusion, the addition of salmeterol (100 micrograms daily) to the existing treatment of chronic asthmatics under consideration for maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy is well-tolerated, improves lung function and provides additional symptom control. Traditional clinical outcomes have demonstrated that salmeterol improves pulmonary function and reduces asthma symptoms. However, they do not evaluate how patients perceive the effect of therapeutic intervention on day-to-day functioning and well-being.
                We sought to evaluate the impact of salmeterol on disease-specific quality of life with the Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, as well as the efficacy and safety of salmeterol in patients with stable asthma who were symptomatic despite daily use of inhaled corticosteroids.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 506 patients. Patients were treated with 42 microg salmeterol or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks delivered through a metered dose inhaler.
                Mean change from baseline in asthma quality-of-life scores was significantly greater (p < or = 0.006) after 12 weeks of treatment with salmeterol compared with placebo ("as-needed" albuterol) in global scores (1.08 vs 0.61) and individual domains (activity limitations, 0.91 vs 0.54; asthma symptoms, 1.28 vs 0.71; emotional function, 1.17 vs 0.65; and environmental exposure, 0.84 vs 0.47). Patients treated with salmeterol experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo in FEV1 (0.42 L vs 0.15 L, p < 0.001), morning peak expiratory flow (47 L/min vs 14 L/min, p < 0.001), evening peak expiratory flow (29 L/min vs 11 L/min, p < 0.001), and asthma symptom scores (daytime scores reduced by 0.55 vs 0.30, p < 0.001). Patients treated with salmeterol used significantly less supplemental albuterol (reduced by 3 puffs/day vs 1 puff/day, p < 0.001).
                Salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in quality-of-life outcomes in patients whose asthma symptoms are not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. These results demonstrate that the benefits of salmeterol are not limited to conventional clinical measures of efficacy. An effective, long-acting bronchodilator could benefit patients with asthma who have symptoms not controlled by antiinflammatory drugs. We compared a new long-acting, inhaled beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol, with a short-acting beta 2-agonist, albuterol, in the treatment of mild-to-moderate asthma.
                We randomly assigned 234 patients (150 male and 84 female patients 12 to 73 years old) to one of three treatment groups: one group received 42 micrograms of salmeterol twice daily, one received 180 micrograms of albuterol four times daily, and one received placebo. Treatment was assigned in a double-blind fashion, and all patients could use supplemental inhaled albuterol as needed during the 12-week treatment period.
                Measurements of the forced expiratory volume in one second, performed hourly for 12 consecutive hours, showed that a single dose of salmeterol produced a greater mean area under the curve than two doses of albuterol taken 6 hours apart (6.3 vs. 4.9 liter.hr, P < 0.05). The difference was significant on day 1 and at week 4 of the study, but not at week 8 or 12. Salmeterol was also more effective than albuterol or placebo (with albuterol taken as needed) in increasing the morning peak expiratory flow rate: salmeterol induced a mean increase of 24 liters per minute over the pretreatment values, as compared with a decrease of 6 liters per minute with albuterol (P < 0.001) and an increase of 1 liter per minute with placebo (P = 0.002). The mean overall symptom score was improved most by salmeterol treatment (P < 0.05), with the number of days with symptoms and of nights with awakenings decreasing by 22 percent and 52 percent, respectively; there were no differences in results between albuterol treatment and placebo administration. We found no evidence of tolerance to the bronchodilating effects of salmeterol, and adverse reactions to all the treatments were infrequent and mild.
                For the management of mild-to-moderate asthma, salmeterol given twice daily is superior to albuterol given either four times daily or as needed. A long-acting inhaled bronchodilator that is both well tolerated and effective could allow for improved control of both daytime and nighttime symptoms in patients with asthma who use frequent as-needed short-acting bronchodilators despite antiinflammatory treatment.
                We compared the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol, 50 micrograms twice daily, with inhaled salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times daily, delivered through a metered-dose inhaler for 3 months in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 228 patients (aged 12 to 76 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma.
                A single morning dose of salmeterol produced improvement in FEV1 that was significantly greater (p < or = 0.012) than that produced by two doses of salbutamol (taken 6 hours apart) when patients were assessed 3 to 6 hours and 10 to 12 hours after the dose. This greater bronchodilation was present on day 1 of the study and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of regular treatment. Over the 12 weeks, compared with salbutamol, salmeterol treatment was associated with a greater mean improvement in morning peak expiratory flow (35 L/min vs -3 L/min, p < 0.001), a higher percentage of days with no symptoms (29% vs 15%; p = 0.012), and a higher percentage of nights with no awakenings (14% vs -1%; p < 0.001). Adverse events were similar for both treatments.
                In this study salmeterol, 50 micrograms twice daily, was well tolerated and more effective than salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times daily, in improving symptoms and lung function in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. Many patients with persistent asthma need both long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for optimal asthma control.
                Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (in a combination dry powder product) with that of placebo, fluticasone, or salmeterol alone.
                A 12-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 356 patients aged 12 years or older with asthma. After a 14-day screening period, patients were randomized to treatment with salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (combination product), salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone 100 microg, or placebo administered in the Diskus dry powder inhaler (GlaxoWellcome, UK) twice daily.
                Mean change in FEV(1) at end point was significantly (P < or =.003) greater with the combination product (0.51 L) compared with placebo (0.01 L), salmeterol (0.11 L), and fluticasone (0.28 L). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.013) area under the curve compared with placebo and fluticasone on day 1 and compared with placebo, salmeterol, and fluticasone at week 1 and week 12. Patients in the combination product group were less likely to withdraw from the study because of worsening asthma compared with those in the other groups (P < or =.020). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.012) morning PEF (combination, 52.5 L/min; placebo, -23.7 L/min; salmeterol, -1.7 L/min; fluticasone, 17.3 L/min) and evening PEF at end point compared with the other groups. The combination product significantly (P < or =.025) reduced symptom scores and albuterol use compared with the other treatments and increased the percentage of nights with no awakenings and the percentage of days with no symptoms compared with placebo and salmeterol. All treatments were equally well tolerated.
                Salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone 100 microg combined in the Diskus powder delivery device offers significant clinical advantages over salmeterol or fluticasone alone at the same doses. Long-acting beta(2)-agonists are prescribed for patients with persistent asthma and are sometimes used without inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). No evidence exists, however, to support their use as monotherapy in adults with persistent asthma.
                To examine the effectiveness of salmeterol xinafoate, a long-acting beta(2)-agonist, as replacement therapy in patients whose asthma is well controlled by low-dose triamcinolone acetonide, an ICS.
                A 28-week, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial conducted at 6 National Institutes of Health-sponsored, university-based ambulatory care centers from February 1997 to January 1999.
                One hundred sixty-four patients aged 12 through 65 years with persistent asthma that was well controlled during a 6-week run-in period of treatment with inhaled triamcinolone (400 microg twice per day).
                Patients were randomly assigned to continue triamcinolone therapy (400 microg twice per day; n = 54) or switch to salmeterol (42 microg twice per day; n = 54) or to placebo (n = 56) for 16 weeks, after which all patients received placebo for an additional 6-week run-out period.
                Change in morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), self-assessed asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol use, asthma-specific quality-of-life scores, treatment failure, asthma exacerbation, bronchial reactivity, and markers of airway inflammation, compared among the 3 treatment groups.
                During the 16-week randomized treatment period, no significant differences between the salmeterol and triamcinolone groups were observed for conventional outcomes of clinical studies of asthma therapy-morning PEF, evening PEF, asthma symptom scores, rescue albuterol sulfate use, or quality of life. Both active treatments were superior to placebo. However, the salmeterol group had more treatment failures than the triamcinolone group (13/54 [24%] vs 3/54 [6%]; P =.004), as well as more asthma exacerbations (11/54 [20%] vs 4/54 [7%]; P =.04), greater increases in median (interquartile range) sputum eosinophils (2.4% [0.0% to 10.6%] vs -0.1% [-0.7% to 0.3%]; P<.001), eosinophil cationic protein (71 [-2 to 430] U/L vs -4 [-31 to 56] U/L; P =.005), and tryptase (3.1 [2.1 to 7.6] ng/mL vs 0.0 [0.0 to 0.7] ng/mL; P<.001). The duration of benefit when patients were switched from active treatment to placebo after 22 weeks of randomized treatment was not significantly longer in the triamcinolone group than in the salmeterol group.
                Patients with persistent asthma well controlled by low doses of triamcinolone cannot be switched to salmeterol monotherapy without risk of clinically significant loss of asthma control. This study investigates the long-term cardiovascular safety of salmeterol powder vs placebo in adolescent and adult patients with mild persistent asthma.
                Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
                Eighteen US clinical centers.
                Three hundred fifty-two patients (> or = 12 years) with mild persistent asthma (duration > or = 6 months) requiring pharmacotherapy; with FEV1 of 70 to 90% of predicted and without abnormal ECG/continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter).
                Randomized to twice-daily salmeterol powder (50 microg) or placebo via breath-actuated device for 52 weeks. Backup albuterol was available to control asthma symptoms.
                Cardiovascular safety was regularly assessed by 12-lead ECG with a 15-s lead II rhythm strip, 24-h continuous ambulatory ECG (Holter) monitoring, serial vital sign measurements, and review of adverse cardiovascular events. No deaths occurred during the study. No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in pulse rate, ECG QTc interval, median number of ventricular or supraventricular ectopic events, incidence of ventricular ectopic couplets and runs, or incidence of > 100 ventricular or supraventricular ectopic events in 24 h. No clinically significant between-group differences were observed in arterial BP or incidence of adverse cardiovascular events. Salmeterol was well tolerated throughout the 52-week study period, with a cardiovascular safety profile similar to that of placebo.
                Long-term, twice-daily pharmacotherapy with salmeterol powder is safe and is not associated with unfavorable clinically significant changes in cardiac function or increases in cardiovascular adverse effects. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and impact on asthma-specific quality of life of salmeterol, a highly selective, long-acting beta 2-agonist, compared with that of placebo (i.e., "as-needed" albuterol).
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study.
                Five hundred thirty-eight nonsmoking symptomatic patients 12 years of age and older meeting American Thoracic Society asthma criteria were enrolled at 55 outpatient clinics; 443 patients completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with either salmeterol aerosol 42 micrograms twice daily or placebo (as-needed albuterol) for 12 weeks. We assessed changes in quality of life using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Efficacy measurements included daily peak expiratory flow (PEF) rate, daytime and nighttime asthma symptoms, results of pulmonary function tests, and supplemental albuterol use. Patients recorded their PEF rate, supplemental albuterol use, and asthma-related symptoms daily. Pulmonary function tests and AQLQ assessments were performed at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Safety measurements included vital signs, physical examination, and reports of clinical adverse events at baseline and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment.
                Mean changes from baseline in AQLQ global and domain scores were significantly greater in the salmeterol group compared with the placebo group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with salmeterol also had significant improvements in mean PEF rates, supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptom scores, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with those given placebo. Both salmeterol and placebo were well tolerated and were not associated with any clinically significant changes in vital signs or physical examination findings.
                Salmeterol 42 micrograms twice daily resulted in significantly greater improvements in asthma-specific quality of life, pulmonary function, and asthma symptoms compared with placebo (as-needed albuterol) in patients with moderate persistent asthma. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate (FP) (44 microg)/salmeterol (21 microg) delivered as two inhalations twice daily via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA 134a) metered dose inhaler (MDI) (FSC) with that of placebo HFA 134a (PLA), fluticasone propionate 44 microg chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) alone and salmeterol 21 microg CFC alone (S) in patients (n=360) with persistent asthma previously treated with beta2-agonists (short- or long-acting) or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). After 12 weeks of treatment, patients treated with FSC had a significantly greater increase (p < or = 0.006) in mean FEV1 AUC(bl) compared with PLA, FP, or S. At end point, mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV1 for FSC (0.58 L) was significantly (p < or = 0.004) greater than PLA (0.14 L), FP (0.36 L), and S (0.25 L). Patients treated with FSC also had a significantly higher probability of remaining in the study without being withdrawn due to worsening asthma (2%) compared with those in the PLA (29%) and S (25%) groups (p < 0.001). Finally, treatment with FSC resulted in significantly (p < or = 0.007) greater improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow, need for rescue albuterol, and asthma symptom scores compared with FP, S, and PLA. The safety profile of FSC was also similar to FP or S alone. Initial maintenance treatment of the two main components of asthma, inflammation, and smooth muscle dysfunction (e.g., bronchoconstriction), with FSC results in greater overall improvements in asthma control compared with treatment of either individual component alone. Therapy with salmeterol, a long-acting, selective, inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agonist, is effective and safe for patients with persistent asthma; however, few long-term studies comparing salmeterol with current combination treatment regimens have been reported.
                A multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 386 patients over 41 to 46 weeks in 27 medical centers (two thirds of the investigators were primary care physicians). Patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol or placebo, and further randomized to weaning or nonweaning from current asthma therapies (except inhaled corticosteroids). Treatment groups were: salmeterol/weaning (S + W), placebo/weaning (P + W), salmeterol/no weaning (S + NW), and placebo/no weaning (P + NW). Attempts at active weaning were carried out at the discretion of the investigator for 2 to 6 weeks. Pulmonary function, albuterol use, and asthma symptoms were measured.
                The clinical benefits of salmeterol occurred despite weaning off existing nonsteroidal asthma medications. The mean morning peak expiratory flow rate was significantly increased in the S + W group (32.3 L/min) compared with both the P + W (4.9 L/min) and P + NW (6.8 L/min) groups (P < .001). Compared with the P + W and P + NW groups, the S + W group experienced significant (P < .05) improvements in overall mean asthma symptom scores, mean number of puffs of supplemental albuterol, the percentage of days with no supplemental albuterol use, and the mean number of awakenings caused by asthma (except for the P + NW comparison, P = .090). No significant differences were noted between treatment groups in any safety evaluation, including 12-lead electrocardiograms.
                The addition of salmeterol in the treatment of persistent asthma resulted in sustained improvement in pulmonary function and symptoms. The long-term use of salmeterol is safe and improves the clinical course and stability of asthma following reductions in nonsteroidal asthma therapy. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SAL) delivered via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with those of its 2 components alone delivered via a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) MDI and placebo (PLA) delivered via HFA MDI in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma that was not controlled by medium doses (equivalent to FP 440-660 microg/d) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).
                This was a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisting of a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period followed by a 12-week, double-blind treatment period. Participants had to be > or =12 years of age and have a diagnosis of asthma requiring pharmacotherapy for at least 6 months before the study. Patients had to have used ICS therapy for > or =3 months before the study and at a consistent dose for the previous month. Lack of asthma control was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) that was 40% to 85% of the predicted value. Patients could not enter the double-blind treatment period if they had 3 days when they required >12 puffs of rescue albuterol per day or >3 nighttime awakenings due to asthma that required treatment with albuterol during the 7 days before the randomization visit. Patients were randomized to receive one of the following treatments delivered via MDI twice daily for 12 weeks: FSC 220/42 microg HFA (2 inhalations of FSC 110/21 microg; 125 microg/21 microg ex-valve); FP 220 microg CFC (2 inhalations of FP 110 microg); SAL 42 microg CFC (2 inhalations of 21 microg); or 2 inhalations of PLA HFA. The primary efficacy end point for FSC versus FP was the mean area under the 12-hour serial FEV(1) curve relative to the prerandomization baseline (FEV(1) AUC(bl)). The primary efficacy end points for FSC versus SAL were the mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end point and the probability of not being withdrawn from the study due to worsening asthma. Tolerability assessments included electrocardiograms, routine clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, oropharyngeal examinations, and physical examinations. Adverse events were assessed at each clinic visit.
                Thirty-two adolescent and 333 adult patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment. The treatment groups were comparable at baseline with respect to demographic characteristics (mean age, 38-41 years; white race, 78%-88%) and pulmonary function (mean percent predicted FEV(1), 68%-69%; mean asthma symptom score, 1.6 [scale 0-5]; and mean daily albuterol use, 3.1 puffs). After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean FEV(1) AUC(bl) was significantly greater in patients who received FSC compared with those who received FP, SAL, or PLA (7.0, 3.6, 5.3, and 1.4 L-h, respectively; all comparisons, P < or = 0.020). At end point, the mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) for FSC was significantly greater than that for FP, SAL, and PLA (0.41, 0.19, 0.15, and -0.12 L; all comparisons, P < or = 0.001). During 12 weeks of treatment, 7% of patients receiving FSC were withdrawn due to worsening asthma, compared with 24% of patients receiving SAL and 54% of patients receiving PLA (P < 0.001); 11% of patients receiving FP were withdrawn due to worsening asthma. Treatment with FSC resulted in significant improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow compared with FP, SAL, and PLA (both, P < 0.001); need for rescue albuterol compared with FP and PLA (P < or =0.005); and asthma symptom scores compared with PLA (P < 0.001). The tolerability of FSC was similar to that of FP or SAL alone. The incidence of possibly drug-related adverse events was generally similar across treatment groups, and the most common (occurring in > or= 2% of patients) were headache (1%-4%), throat irritation (1%-2%), candidiasis of the mouth/throat (0%-2%), unspecified oropharyngeal plaques (0%-2%), and palpitations (0%-2%).
                In these adolescent and adult patients whose asthma was not controlled by medium doses of an ICS, FSC delivered via HFA 134a MDI (2 inhalations of 110/21-microg strength administered BID) was more effective in improving lung function than FP or SAL monotherapy or PLA. All treatments were well tolerated. The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder have not previously been evaluated in children with asthma in the United States.
                The efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder versus placebo were compared in children between the ages of 4 and 11 years with chronic persistent asthma.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial was performed at 11 clinical centers. Two hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to receive 50 microg salmeterol powder or placebo (and albuterol as needed) twice daily via a breath-actuated device for 12 weeks. Twelve-hour serial pulmonary function assessments were conducted on day 1 and at week 12. Daily recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), supplemental albuterol use, asthma symptoms, and nocturnal awakenings were assessed.
                On day 1 and at week 12, weighted mean percent of predicted PEF (P < .001, day 1 and P=.008, week 12) and weighted mean forced expiratory volume in one second (P < .001, day 1 and week 12) were significantly higher at all timepoints evaluated over the 12-hour postdosing period in patients treated with salmeterol powder compared with placebo. Overall reductions in supplemental albuterol use and mean asthma symptom scores were also significantly greater in children administered salmeterol compared with placebo (P=.004 and P=.006, respectively). The frequency of adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups.
                Salmeterol powder (50 microg twice daily) is effective and safe in producing bronchodilation and relieving symptoms in children with chronic persistent asthma during 12 weeks of treatment. To determine the effect of long-term salmeterol aerosol therapy on airway hyperresponsiveness measured by methacholine challenge.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.
                Thirty-one clinical centers in the United States.
                Four hundred eight asthmatic patients > or = 12 years of age with baseline FEV1 of > or = 70% of predicted values. Patients were not using inhaled corticosteroids.
                Twice-daily salmeterol aerosol, 42 microg, or placebo via metered-dose inhaler for 24 weeks. Backup albuterol was available.
                Pulmonary function tests were performed before, during, and after treatment. Subjects recorded asthma-related symptoms, morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF) levels, and use of supplemental albuterol daily on diary cards. Methacholine challenges were performed 10 to 14 h postdose at weeks 4, 12, and 24, and 3 and 7 days posttreatment. Over 24 weeks of treatment, salmeterol provided significant (p < 0.001) protection against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction of approximately one doubling dose of methacholine when compared to placebo with no evidence for a progressive decrease in protection. A rebound increase in airway hyperresponsiveness was not observed 3 and 7 days after cessation of salmeterol therapy. Salmeterol treatment resulted in sustained improvements of 0.21 to 0.26 L in morning premedication FEV1 and an improvement of 26.2 L/min in morning PEF when compared to placebo (p < 0.001). The use of salmeterol significantly reduced combined daytime asthma symptoms by 20% when compared to placebo (p = 0.005). A total of 34 and 48 exacerbations, respectively, were reported in the Salmeterol and placebo groups, and no evidence was present for a difference in the severity of asthma exacerbations between groups. Adverse event profiles were similar for the salmeterol and placebo groups.
                Regular long-term use of salmeterol aerosol resulted in sustained improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control over the 24-week treatment period. There was no increase in bronchial hyperresponsiveness or loss of bronchoprotection at 24 weeks from that seen following 4 weeks of therapy. There was no evidence of rebound airway hyperresponsiveness after cessation of salmeterol treatment. Regular treatment with the long-acting beta-agonist salmeterol does not lead to clinical instability or vulnerability to unpredictable asthma attacks.
In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular salmeterol. There is also a clear increase in risk of asthma-related mortality in patients not using inhaled corticosteroids in the two large surveillance studies. Although the increase in asthma-related mortality was smaller in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids at baseline, the confidence interval is wide, so we cannot conclude that the inhaled corticosteroids abolish the risks of regular salmeterol. The adverse effects of regular salmeterol in children remain uncertain due to the small number of children studied.