Analgesic effect of naproxen sodium, codeine, a naproxen-codeine combination and aspirin on the postoperative pain of oral surgery. Efficacy and tolerability of the specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor DFP compared with naproxen sodium in patients with postoperative dental pain. Analgesic efficacy of the cyclooxygenase-inhibiting nitric oxide donor AZD3582 in postoperative dental pain: Comparison with naproxen and rofecoxib in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Assay of aspirin and naproxen analgesia. Nimesulide in the treatment of postoperative pain: a double-blind, comparative study in patients undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. Efficacy of single-dose and multidose rofecoxib in the treatment of post-orthopedic surgery pain. A double-blind, randomized study of naproxen sodium, ibuprofen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. The post-operative analgesic efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib compared with placebo and naproxen after total knee or hip arthroplasty. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the analgesic effect of etoricoxib to placebo, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen with codeine using the dental impaction pain model. A single-dose, double-blind comparison of naproxen sodium, acetaminophen, and placebo in postoperative dental pain. Etoricoxib provides analgesic efficacy to patients after knee or hip replacement surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
In a double-blind study, 198 outpatients with pain after oral surgery were randomly assigned to treatment with a single oral dose of naproxen sodium 550 mg, codeine sulfate 60 mg, a combination of naproxen sodium 550 mg with codeine sulfate 60 mg, aspirin 650 mg or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Orthogonal contrasts for the four treatments making up the factorial component showed that the naproxen effect was significant for every measurement of total and peak analgesia; the codeine effect was significant for total and peak pain relief and patients' overall evaluation. The naproxen-codeine interaction was not statistically significant for any measure, which suggests that the analgesic effect of the combination represents the additive effect of its constituents. Based on pairwise comparisons, aspirin was significantly superior to placebo for most measures of effect, naproxen was significantly superior to both aspirin and codeine for all measures and the combination was significantly superior to naproxen for patients' overall evaluation. No more patients experienced adverse effects with aspirin or naproxen than with placebo, but significantly more patients receiving the codeine-containing treatments experienced adverse effects than those receiving aspirin and naproxen. DFP [3-(2-propyloxy)-(4-methyl-sulfonylphenyl)-(5,5-dimethyl)-fu ranone] is a highly specific cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (>2500-fold selective in transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell assays) that has demonstrated efficacy in preclinical models of pain and inflammation. The present single-dose, randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was undertaken to compare DFP 5, 25, and 50 mg with naproxen sodium 550 mg and with placebo in 196 patients (mean age, 25.8 years; 187 [95.4%] males) who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after surgical removal of > or =2 third molars. Overall analgesic effect, duration of effect, time to onset of analgesic effect, peak analgesic effect, and tolerability were assessed over a 24-hour postdose period. Both DFP 25 and 50 mg, as well as the active comparator, naproxen sodium 550 mg, were significantly more effective than placebo. The onset of analgesic effect in the DFP 25-mg, DFP 50-mg, and naproxen sodium 550-mg groups did not differ significantly. DFP was generally well tolerated in single doses up to 50 mg. DFP 50 mg was efficacious in the treatment of postoperative dental pain and was indistinguishable from the active comparator, naproxen sodium 550 mg. This study assessed the analgesic efficacy of single doses of 4-(nitrooxy)butyl-(2S)-2-(6-methoxy-2-naphthyl) propanoate (AZD3582) in acute postoperative dental pain after the removal of an impacted mandibular third molar (ie, wisdom tooth).
                Two randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind studies were performed. In a dose-finding study, 242 patients were randomized to AZD3582 375, 750, 1500, or 2250 mg (n = 41, 37, 42, and 41, respectively); naproxen 500 mg (n = 39); or placebo (n = 42). In a comparator study, 282 patients were randomized to AZD3582 500 mg (n = 78) or 750 mg (n = 83), rofecoxib 50 mg (n = 80), or placebo (n = 41). Primary outcomes included time to rescue medication, time to pain relief, and mean pain intensity difference (MPID), as well as safety profile. Pain was rated on a visual analog scale.
                In the dose-finding study, 52% (126/242) were women; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (4) years, mean weight was 69.0 kg, and the mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 23.7 (3) kg/m2. In the comparator study, 58% (164/282) were women; the mean (SD) age was 27 (6.4) years, mean weight was 71 kg, and mean (SD) BMI was 24.2 (3) kg/m2. In the dose-finding study, the AZD3582 750-, 1500-, and 2250-mg groups were superior to placebo in the primary variables "time to rescue medication (0-8 hours)" (hazard ratios [HRs] [95% CIs], 0.17 [0.07-0.42], P < 0.003; 0.23 [0.11-0.50], P < 0.001; and 0.15 [0.06-0.36], P < 0.001, respectively), "time to meaningful pain relief" (HRs [95% CIs], 3.42 [1.87-6.25], P < 0.003; 2.49 [1.37-4.50], P < 0.003; and 3.07 [1.70-5.55], P < 0.001, respectively), and MPID (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA] least squares mean [LSM] differences [95% CIs], 25.8 [17.3-34.4], P < 0.003; 20.4 [12.1-28.7], P < 0.003; and 29.3 [20.9-37.6], P < 0.001, respectively). AZD3582 and naproxen did not show any statistically significant differences for the 3 primary variables, except that naproxen was superior to the AZD3582 375-mg dose for the variables time to meaningful pain relief (HR difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.29-0.78], P < 0.004) and MPID (difference in ANCOVA LSM, -10.2, [95% CI, -18.2 to -2.2], P < 0.012). The median times to meaningful pain relief were 115 minutes for AZD3582 375 mg, 66 minutes for 750 mg, 85 minutes for 1500 mg, 81 minutes for 2250 mg, and 162 minutes for placebo (P = NS, P = 0.003, P < 0.003, and P < 0.001, respectively). The median time to first rescue medication was 144 minutes for placebo, and <50% of the subjects on any of the AZD3582 doses or naproxen took rescue medication within 8 hours after dosing. In the comparator study, AZD3582 750 mg was superior to placebo in "time to rescue medication (0-24 hours)" (HR [95% CI], 0.4 [0.3-0.6], P < 0.001), "time to confirmed perceptible pain relief" (2.1 [1.1-3.8], P = 0.02), and MPID (11.9 [4.2-19.5], P = 0.002). However, inferiority of AZD3582 to rofecoxib for MPID could not be excluded (tolerance limit of 10 mm; P = NS for noninferiority testing). The median times to confirmed perceptible pain relief were 45 minutes for AZD3582 500 mg, 40 minutes for 750 mg, and 37 minutes for rofecoxib. The median times to first rescue medication were 218 minutes for AZD3582 500 mg, 365 minutes for 750 mg, 635 minutes for rofecoxib, and 90 minutes for placebo. Overall, AZD3582 was well tolerated. However, an effect on orthostatic blood pressure could not be excluded because there seemed to be more subjects with dizziness and orthostatic blood pressure reduction who were administered AZD3582 > or =750 mg. The proportions of patients with vertigo and decreased orthostatic blood pressure each group were as follows: AZD3582 500 mg, 6%; AZD3582 750 mg, 12%; rofecoxib, 3%; and placebo, 5%.
                AZD3582 750 mg had similar analgesic efficacy as equimolar doses of naproxen, but noninferiority to rofecoxib was not demonstrated. To establish the relative potency of naproxen and aspirin for oral analgesia, a 4-point, noncrossover bioassay with placebo control was undertaken with 197 patients. Subjective-response methods were used to determine two measures of postoperative analgesia over a period of 6 hr. With reasonable confidence for an oral analgesic assay, we found 220 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for pain relief and 330 mg of naproxen to be equivalent to 600 mg of aspirin for decreased pain intensity. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nimesulide in the relief of postoperative pain after orthopedic surgery compared with naproxen and placebo.
                In this multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel group study, 94 patients with at least moderate postoperative pain after arthroscopy and meniscectomy were randomized to receive nimesulide 100 mg b.i.d., naproxen 500 mg b.i.d., or placebo for a maximum of 3 days.
                Nimesulide was significantly more effective than placebo for the treatment of postoperative pain, as measured by the primary efficacy variable of summed pain intensity difference within 6 hours after first treatment (10.91 vs. 6.29). Furthermore, nimesulide also provided significantly better pain relief than naproxen on this parameter. Overall, nimesulide demonstrated superior analgesic activity compared with naproxen and placebo for the majority of secondary efficacy variables. All 3 treatments were well tolerated, with a lower number of patients reporting adverse events in the nimesulide group. Nimesulide recipients reported no gastrointestinal disorders.
                This study demonstrates that nimesulide is an effective, fast-acting and well-tolerated oral anti-inflammatory drug with a distinct analgesic activity after out-patient orthopedic surgery. To determine the efficacy of rofecoxib in post-orthopedic surgery pain, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group trial. Two hundred eighteen patients enrolled. Day 1 patients received placebo, rofecoxib 50 mg, or naproxen sodium 550 mg. Days 2 through 5, the placebo and naproxen sodium groups received placebo, and the rofecoxib group received rofecoxib 25 or 50 mg. Rofecoxib 50 mg was superior to placebo (P < .05) and similar to naproxen sodium for all single-dose measures of pain relief. Days 2 through 5, the rofecoxib 50 mg group used less supplemental narcotic analgesia (P = .005) and reported less pain on global evaluations (P = .041) when compared with the placebo group; the efficacy of rofecoxib 25 mg fell between that of placebo and rofecoxib 50 mg for these endpoints (P < or = .267). Rofecoxib 50 mg once daily effectively treated post-orthopedic surgery pain. In a double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled study, 203 patients with post-operative dental pain following the extraction of one or two bony impacted third molars were randomized to receive a single dose of naproxen sodium 220 mg, ibuprofen 200 mg or placebo. Pain intensity and pain relief were assessed at intervals for 12 hours postdose. Both active drugs demonstrated superior analgesic efficacy over placebo. Naproxen sodium and ibuprofen were comparable both in onset of analgesic action and in pain relief. From 1 to 12 hours postdose, naproxen sodium showed a trend for superior analgesic efficacy compared with ibuprofen; this trend reached statistical significance at the 12-hour time point. Both drugs were well-tolerated and effective analgesics for postoperative dental pain. Lumiracoxib is a novel selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor in development for the treatment of chronic and acute pain.
                This randomized, double-blind multicentre study enrolled 180 patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate-to-severe pain (>or=2 on a 4-point categorical scale) within 48 h of unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty. Patients were randomized to receive lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (n = 60), placebo (n = 60) or naproxen 500 mg twice daily (n = 60). The study consisted of a 12-h single-dose phase followed by a multiple-dose phase (up to 96 h or until discontinuation). The primary efficacy measure was the summed (time-weighted) pain intensity difference over 0-8 h after the first dose (SPID-8).
                Lumiracoxib and naproxen were comparable and both treatments were superior to placebo for the primary efficacy measure, SPID-8. Both treatments were generally similar and also superior to placebo for the secondary efficacy measures during both the single- and multiple-dose phases for up to 96 h. Both active treatments were well tolerated.
                Lumiracoxib is an effective alternative to traditional non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for the treatment of post-operative pain. To compare the overall analgesic effect, including time to onset, peak and duration of effect for etoricoxib 120 mg, a new COX-2 selective inhibitor, in patients with acute pain to that of placebo. Naproxen sodium 550 mg and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg were the active comparators.
                A total of 201 patients with moderate to severe pain following surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars, of which at least the mandibular tooth was impacted, were randomly allocated to receive single oral doses of placebo (n = 50), etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 50), naproxen sodium 550 mg (n = 51), or acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (n = 50). The endpoints included total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8, primary end point), sum of pain intensity difference over 8 hours, patient's global evaluation, onset, peak, and duration of analgesia.
                Etoricoxib 120 mg had a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean TOPAR8 score than placebo (20.9 vs 5.4; P < 0.001) and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (20.9 vs 11.5; P < 0.001), and a similar LS mean TOPAR8 score to naproxen sodium 550 mg (20.9 vs 21.3). All three active treatments had rapid onset of analgesia, median time approximately 30 minutes. The duration of analgesic effect, defined as median time to rescue medication use, was >24 hours for etoricoxib, 20.8 hours for naproxen sodium, 3.6 hours for acetaminophen/codeine, and 1.6 hours for placebo.
                Etoricoxib is a new COX-2 selective inhibitor under development for treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and acute pain. In this study, etoricoxib 120 mg provided rapid and long-lasting pain relief to patients with moderate-to-severe postdental surgery pain. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated. The analgesic efficacy and duration of action of naproxen sodium 440 mg (n = 92), acetaminophen 1000 mg (n = 89), and placebo (n = 45) were compared in a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, 12-hour study of patients with at least moderate pain secondary to extraction of three or four third molars. Time to remedication, a measure of duration of analgesic effect, was significantly longer (P < 0.001) with naproxen sodium (median, 9.9 hours) than with either acetaminophen (median, 3.1 hours) or placebo (median, 2.0 hours). Naproxen sodium was also superior to acetaminophen for peak pain intensity difference (visual analog scale), summed pain intensity differences, total pain relief, peak pain relief, time to reduction of pain by 50%, and overall rating. The overall percentages of patients reporting adverse events, and the types of events reported, were comparable with the three treatments. Thus naproxen sodium demonstrated superior efficacy and similar tolerability to acetaminophen in this postoperative dental pain model. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study we assessed the analgesic effect of etoricoxib (a new cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor) in patients having had knee or hip replacement surgery. A total of 228 patients with moderate or severe pain were randomly allocated within 72 h after surgery to receive etoricoxib 120 mg, controlled-release naproxen sodium 1100 mg, or placebo (1:1:1) on day 1 followed by etoricoxib and placebo (1:2) on days 2 to 7. Patients reported pain scores, rescue (opioid-combination) medication use, and the response to study drug. On day 1, etoricoxib provided an analgesic effect superior to placebo and similar to controlled-release naproxen sodium as demonstrated by the total pain relief score over 8 h, the primary end-point; least-squares mean scores were 11.0, 11.5, and 5.6, respectively (P < 0.001 versus placebo). Similarly, a larger percentage of patients receiving etoricoxib and naproxen sodium than those receiving placebo reported good to excellent responses to study drug: 53%, 60%, and 26% respectively. On days 2-7, etoricoxib demonstrated a significant reduction of rescue medication use, 35% (P < 0.001 versus placebo). The clinical relevance of the decrease was confirmed by Patient's Global Evaluation (P < 0.05 versus placebo). Patients receiving etoricoxib also experienced significantly less "worst" and "average" pain than did those on placebo. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated in this study; the incidence of adverse experiences was infrequent and similar across treatment groups. In summary, etoricoxib provided analgesia that was similar to controlled-release naproxen sodium on day 1 and superior to placebo with reduced supplemental opioid use over 7 days.
                In a postsurgery setting (knee and hip replacements), etoricoxib 120 mg provided analgesia superior to placebo and similar to controlled-release naproxen sodium 1100 mg. Patients receiving etoricoxib suffered less pain and took less opioid rescue medication compared with patients on placebo.
Doses equivalent to 500 mg and 400 mg naproxen administered orally provided effective analgesia to adults with moderate to severe acute postoperative pain. About half of participants treated with these doses experienced clinically useful levels of pain relief, compared to 15% with placebo, and half required additional medication within nine hours, compared to two hours with placebo. Associated adverse events did not differ from placebo.