[The effect of triamcinolone acetonide, montelukast, nedocromil sodium, formoterol on levels levels of sICAM-1, sIL-2R in serum and clinical course of asthma in children]. [The effect of nedocromil sodium on levels of IL-4 and IgE in serum of children with bronchial asthma]. Nedocromil sodium vs. sodium cromoglycate pressurized aerosol in the prevention of bronchoconstriction induced by ultrasonic nebulized distilled water in asthmatic children. Early use of inhaled nedocromil sodium in children following an acute episode of asthma. The effect of nedocromil sodium on histamine responsiveness in clinically stable asthmatic children. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy of nedocromil sodium in the management of childhood grass-pollen asthma. Effect of nedocromil sodium on bronchial hyperreactivity in children with nonatopic asthma. Comparison of two different dose regimens of nedocromil sodium with placebo in the management of childhood asthma. Effect of nedocromil sodium on aspecific bronchial hyper-reactivity in asthmatic children. [Study of the protective action of nedocromil sodium with bronchial cold-air provocation in children with bronchial asthma]. Prevention of fog-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children by nedocromil sodium nebulizer solutions. The effect of nedocromil sodium on childhood asthma during the viral season.
One of the characteristics of asthma is the variability of inflammation. Thus, it is important to monitor inflammation serially in asthma, e.g. by the use of peripheral blood markers. To evaluate the effect of treatment on allergic inflammation, we measured serum levels of sIL-2R, sICAM-1 and clinical parameters before and after 4 weeks treatment with triamcinolon, montelukast, nedocromil and formoterol. It was 8 week, placebo-controlled and randomized, double blind trial of 158 children with moderate atopic asthma. Patients were randomly allocated to received 400 micrograms triamcinolon (n = 28), 5 or 10 mg (according to age) montelukast (n = 27), 16 mg nedocromil (n = 30), 24 micrograms formoterol (n = 29) or placebo (n = 44). 140 children completed the study. After treatment with triamcinolon, montelukast and nedocromil sIL-2R and sICAM-1 serum level significantly decreased, and all clinical parameters improved; treatment with triamcinolon had the strongest effect on most parameters (except of FEV1). Mean sIL-2R before and after treatment with triamcinolon were 724.1 pg/ml and 486.1 pg/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with nedocromil were 760.2 pg/ml and 596.7 pg/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with montelukast were 617.9 pg/ml and 491.2 pg/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with formoterol were 705.4 pg/ml and 698.9 pg/ml respectively (p = 0.8). Mean sICAM-1 serum levels before and after treatment with triamcinolon were 262.4 ng/ml and 210.4 ng/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with nedocromil were 292.9 ng/ml and 258.4 ng/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with montelukast were 277.7 ng/ml and 242.9 ng/ml respectively (p < 0.001); with formoterol were 262.6 ng/ml and 260.0 ng/ml (p = 0.6). We found significant correlation between: sIL-2R and hyperresponsiveness, sICAM-1 and hyper responsiveness, FEV1 and sICAM-1, FEV1 and sIL-2R, sIL-2R and sICAM-1 after treatment. This study shows that triamcinolon, montelukast and nedocromil contribute to inhibition of allergic inflammation by decreasing sIL-2R and sICAM-1 serum levels. The serum level of sIL-2R and sICAM-1 seem to be a good clinical marker of monitoring the disease; their levels decrease after treatment together with improvement in hyperresponsiveness and clinical parameters. Levels of pro-allergic cytokine IL-4 are increased in asthmatic airways, contributing to allergic inflammation. IL-4 and IL-13 are the most important factors in production of class E immunoglobulin, playing major role in childhood atopic asthma. The mechanism of effect of nedocromil, often prescribed in children, has been discussed. Our previous study on the effect of nedocromil on different inflammatory markers, showed decreased levels of IL-4 and IgE after monotherapy in 15 asthmatic children. The purpose of this study was to define the effect of treatment with nedocromil on serum level of IL-4 and IgE, clinical symptoms and bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) in children with moderate atopic asthma. It was 8 week, placebo-controlled and randomized, double blind trial of 81 children with moderate atopic asthma allergic to dust mite. Patients were randomly allocated to receive nedocromil sodium two puffs four times daily (0.002 g/puff) (n = 34) or placebo (n = 47). 69 children completed the study. After treatment with nedocromil the levels of IL-4 and IgE in blood serum in study group significantly decreased, and all clinical parameters improved. Mean levels of IL-4 in serum before and after treatment with nedocromil were 0.13 pg/ml +/- 0.01 and 0.12 pg/ml +/- 0.02 respectively (p < 0.01). Mean serum levels of IgE before and after treatment with nedocromil were 556.83 IU/ml +/- 201.3 and 485 IU/ml +/- 200.5 respectively (p < 0.02). This study demonstrate that one possible way by which nedocromil contribute to inhibition of allergic inflammation is by decreasing IL-4 and IgE levels. To compare the effectiveness of nedocromil sodium (NS) and sodium cromoglycate (SCG), administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) with a 700 mL holding chamber (Fisonair Fisons UK) in preventing bronchoconstriction induced by inhalation of ultrasonically nebulized distilled water (UNDW), 12 asthmatic children were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, intrapatient study. Following a baseline challenge with UNDW, the protective effect of NS, SCG, or placebo was evaluated in each subject. Cumulative doses of delivered nebulized water producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (PD20 UNDW) was measured. Mean (+/- SD) PD20 UNDW was 4.83 (+/- 4.84), 10.16 (+/- 7.05), 1.58 (+/- 0.5), and 15.93 (+/- 0.23) respectively, for baseline, and placebo, SCG, and NS-treated groups. A significant (P < 0.05) protection from UNDW induced bronchoconstriction by NS was observed in comparison with placebo, while no such effect was evident when the children were treated with SCG. Current guidelines on the treatment of childhood asthma recommend the introduction of an anti-inflammatory drug in children who have persistent symptoms and require regular treatment with a bronchodilator. The efficacy and safety of inhaled nedocromil sodium (Tilade Mint aerosol) administered using a Fisonair spacer at a dose of 4 mg three times daily was compared with placebo in the treatment of asthmatic children aged 6-12 years who are symptomatic and recovering from an acute exacerbation of asthma.
                A group comparative, double blind, placebo controlled trial was performed in children who were recovering from an acute episode of asthma following treatment in the emergency department of the hospital or in children referred from their general practitioner following a wheezing episode and documented evidence of at least two previous episodes of wheezing. A two week baseline period on existing bronchodilator treatment was followed by a 12 week treatment period on either nedocromil sodium (2 mg/puff) or placebo. Both treatments were administered using a Fisonair spacer at a dose of two puffs three times daily. Changes from baseline values in daytime asthma and night time asthma symptom scores, usage of rescue bronchodilators, mean peak expiratory flow (PEF) recorded twice daily on diary cards, patients' opinion of treatment, and withdrawals due to treatment failure were measured during the primary treatment period (last six weeks of treatment).
                One hundred and forty two children aged 6-12 years entered the baseline period. Sixty three were withdrawn due to failure to meet the entry criteria (18) or the criteria for asthma symptom severity (15) or reversibility (9), because they developed uncontrolled asthma (2), because they took disallowed treatment (2), or for other non-trial related reasons (17). Seventy nine patients (46 boys) of mean age 8. 8 years entered the treatment period. There were significant differences in the changes from baseline values during the last six weeks of treatment in favour of nedocromil sodium compared with placebo in the primary variables of daytime asthma and night time asthma, morning and evening PEF, and the usage of rescue inhaled bronchodilators; 53% of patients reported nedocromil sodium to be very or moderately effective compared with 44% placebo. Improvement in asthma symptoms, PEF, and reduction in use of rescue bronchodilators did not reach statistical significance until after six weeks of treatment. Twenty two patients were withdrawn or dropped out during the treatment phase, 12 due to uncontrolled asthma or persistence of asthma symptoms, four due to suspected adverse drug reactions (nedocromil sodium 3 (headaches 2, angio-oedema/urticaria 1), placebo 1(persistent cough)), and six due to non-treatment related reasons. Seventy one adverse events were reported by 27 patients in the nedocromil group and 75 by 30 patients in the placebo group.
                Asthma symptoms, use of bronchodilators, and lung function can be improved significantly in children recovering from an acute exacerbation of asthma or wheeze and currently receiving treatment with bronchodilators alone by the addition of inhaled nedocromil sodium at a dose of 4 mg three times daily administered using a Fisonair holding chamber. A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was undertaken in 120 clinically stable asthmatic children (aged 6-19 years) to determine the ability of 8 weeks of treatment with nedocromil sodium (4 mg, three times a day) to reduce the level of histamine responsiveness. Despite the subjects being clinically stable and reporting few asthma symptoms, approximately one-third had abnormal pulmonary function on enrollment into the study. Statistically significant increases in pulmonary function were seen in the group treated with nedocromil sodium but not in the control group (p = 0.01). Furthermore, 52% of the individuals with abnormal pulmonary function returned to normal following treatment with nedocromil sodium compared to 11% of those with abnormal pulmonary function who received placebo. However, there were no differences in the level of histamine responsiveness between the two treatment groups at baseline or after 4 or 8 weeks of treatment with nedocromil sodium or placebo. These data suggest that the level of histamine responsiveness is not intimately related to the level of asthma control in children. The aim of this double-blind placebo-controlled trial was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of nedocromil sodium at a dose of 4 mg four times daily, in the management of children suffering from grass-pollen asthma. Thirty-one children suffering from seasonal asthma (24 boys and seven girls, aged 4-21 yr, mean 11 yr) were enrolled in the study during the 1988 pollen season. Only one child was aged 4 yr, and she was a cooperative girl able to use the metered dose inhaler properly. In addition, in each group there was a patient aged 20 and 21 years, respectively, who had been followed up by us since childhood. Treatments were delivered by pressurized aerosol over a period of 4 weeks following a 1-week baseline, during which patients were required to show active disease by obtaining a minimum symptom score (almost 2 points of severity score on at least 3 days of the baseline period). The patients were randomly assigned to both treatment groups, all were taking inhaled or oral bronchodilators, when necessary. Twenty-nine patients completed the trial, 16 in the nedocromil sodium treatment group and 13 in the placebo group. One child of each group was withdrawn due to treatment failure. Statistically significant differences in favour of nedocromil sodium were found regarding morning tightness and mean morning PEFR values on diary cards (P less than 0.01 and P less than 0.05, respectively), bronchodilator usage (P less than 0.05), pulmonary function tests (PFT) at clinic visits (P less than 0.05), and in parents' opinion (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Although cromones inhibit immediate bronchial responses to both allergen and nonspecific challenge, their effectiveness in treating nonatopic childhood asthma is unknown. We therefore investigated a possible effect of nedocromil sodium on bronchial hyperreactivity and asthmatic symptoms in a group of children receiving this drug for nonatopic asthma.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of two parallel groups was carried out in our pediatric respiratory disease clinic. Twenty children with mild, nonatopic asthma hyperreactive to fog-induced challenge were treated with inhaled nedocromil sodium 16 mg each day for 6 weeks (group N) or with a placebo (group P). Five girls and five boys (7 to 13 years of age) were randomly assigned to group N, and three girls and seven boys (aged 6 to 16 years) to group P. Symptoms and bronchodilator use were reported on diary cards. Ultrasonic nebulized distilled water PD10 was measured administering increasing doses of nebulized distilled water (2.5, 5, 10, 20, and 40 L).
                Symptom scores were significantly affected by the active treatment. Baseline lung function was normal and remained unaltered after treatment with nedocromil sodium. Nonspecific reactivity was significantly reduced over time only in the active treatment group.
                Nedocromil sodium can reduce the severity of asthmatic symptoms and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity at fog-induced challenge in children with stable, nonatopic asthma. According to the recent guidelines, persistent asthma requires daily antiinflammatory treatment with either nedocromil sodium, cromolyn sodium or inhaled corticosteroids. In choosing the most appropriate drug, it is wise to weigh the therapeutic advantages against possible side effects, particularly in patients at the milder end of disease spectrum and in children. Cromolyn sodium and nedocromil sodium both have strong safety profiles, and nedocromil sodium has been reported to have a broader spectrum of efficacy than cromolyn sodium. In an attempt to provide data for the efficacy of two different dose regimens of inhaled nedocromil sodium in childhood asthma, a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was conducted in 38 subjects with mild to moderate persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomly allocated into one of the three study groups and treated with either placebo or with two times daily (4 mg b.i.d.) or four times daily (4 mg q.i.d.) regimens of inhaled nedocromil sodium for 8 weeks. Symptom scores, bronchodilator requirements, FEV1, daily PEFs and methacholine hyperreactivity were evaluated at study entry, before randomization and at weeks 4 and 8 of treatment. In the four times daily treatment group, slight but significant increases were observed in FEV1, peak expiratory flows and symptom scores (p < 0.05 for each). However, there was no significant change in methacholine hyperreactivity and bronchodilator requirement. In the two times dose regimen and placebo groups, there were no improvements in any of the variables. The compliance, measured as the reduced weight of the canisters, was low, but was not different between the two nedocromil sodium treatment groups. The four times daily regimen of nedocromil sodium was effective in improving control of mild to moderate persistent asthma in children, whereas the two times daily regimen failed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether nedocromil sodium benefits urban asthmatic children showing seasonal bronchial hyper-reactivity to ultrasonic nebulization of distilled water (UNDW). A prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study was carried out at the outpatient pulmonology service at a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Twelve children living in Milan, who were 7-17 years of age, who were SPT and RAST-negative to perennial allergens, who were suffering from episodic asthma, and showing seasonal bronchial hyper-reactivity to UNDW during winter, participated in this study. All the children received either placebo or nedocromil sodium, 4 mg every 6 h for 6 weeks. Spirometry and UNDW challenge were done at the following times: day-7; day 0; day 1; day 7; day 14; day 28; day 42. No differences were found in the basal spirometric parameters, which were normal in both nedocromil and placebo groups. Bronchial reactivity to UNDW was found to be significantly decreased in the group treated with nedocromtl starting from day 7. It is therefore concluded that nedocromil sodium can reverse bronchial hyper-reactivity caused by seasonal factors such as cold, viral infections and atmospheric pollutants in children suffering from asthma. 12 children with known bronchial hyperreactivity and asthma had isocapnic cold air hyperventilation challenges of their bronchial airways. In a double-blind cross-over study they inhaled either placebo or nedocromil sodium (2 puffs à 2 mg) from a MDI before challenge. 2 subjects were found to be non-responders during the two days of the study. The remainder all reacted on the placebo days, while 5 subjects were completely protected on the nedocromil-days and 5 subjects were partially protected. Nedocromil is a potent agent for the suppression of bronchial hyperresponsiveness. nan Viral-induced symptomatic respiratory infections (SRI) frequently cause exacerbations of asthma in children. This study investigated the protective effects of 0.5% nedocromil sodium nebulizer solution given three times a day in preventing asthma exacerbations associated with SRI. Ninety-three mild-moderate asthmatic children (6 to 12 yr of age) received either 0.5% nedocromil sodium or placebo for 24 wk during the viral season. The nedocromil sodium group was symptom-free 58% of the days, and the placebo-treated patients were symptom-free 45% of the days (p = 0.027). During Weeks 1-12, significant differences favored nedocromil sodium for asthma summary score (means: nedocromil sodium = 0.61, placebo = 0.92; p = 0.026), and daytime asthma (nedocromil sodium = 0.78, placebo = 1.22; p = 0.03). Significant differences were noted during monthly intervals for cough (Weeks 1-4: nedocromil sodium = 0.61, placebo = 0.92, p = 0.027) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (nedocromil sodium 262, placebo = 254 L/min, p = 0.041 Weeks 9-12). Patients in the active treatment group reduced their need for rescue inhaled beta 2-agonist by 10%, whereas patients treated with placebo demonstrated a 24% increase. There was a strong correlation between asthma symptoms and SRI symptoms (r = 0.47; p < 0.001). During SRIs, patients in the nedocromil sodium group demonstrated more rapid resolution of asthma symptoms immediately following infection (p = 0.033 summary score, p = 0.039 sleep difficulty). No serious adverse events were noted. Nedocromil sodium did not prevent the infection or exacerbation of asthma symptoms during SRI.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
A limited number of small studies have shown that nedocromil is of benefit in improving lung function and some measures of symptoms, but the evidence with regard to the primary outcome of the review was conflicting. Two long-term trials did not show consistent effects on lung function outcomes, whereas several small short-term trials have shown benefit in these outcomes. Differing severities at baseline may explain this difference with milder participants experiencing less benefit, although the discrepancy between study findings may also reflect publication bias. Nedocromil sodium is associated with a very good safety profile with no significant short term or long- term adverse side effects. Although nedocromil may have advantages over inhaled corticosteroids in terms of side effects, there is a need for head to head trials of nedocromil and inhaled corticosteroids to establish whether asthma control is similar, especially in mild asthma. It is not yet clear where nedocromil should sit in relation to other therapies in the treatment of asthma in children.