Prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in cardiac transplant recipients by trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole. Ofloxacin versus co-trimoxazole for prevention of infection in neutropenic patients following cytotoxic chemotherapy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for prophylaxis of infection in renal transplantation: clinical efficacy, absorption of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, effects on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis. Infection prophylaxis in neutropenic patients with acute leukaemia--a randomized, comparative study with ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole/colistin. Successful intermittent chemoprophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis. Effect of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis on outcome of childhood lymphocytic leukemia. A Pediatric Oncology Group Study. Randomized trial of weekly sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine vs. daily low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after liver transplantation. A prospective randomized trial comparing the toxicity and safety of atovaquone with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole as Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia prophylaxis following autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole compared with ciprofloxacin for the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Successful chemoprophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis. Use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent bacterial infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) continues to cause significant morbidity in recipients of solid-organ transplants. While some programs administer trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylactically following transplantation, a prospective determination of the safety and efficacy of TMP-SMX in cardiac transplant recipients has not previously been reported. We therefore prospectively randomized 58 cardiac transplant recipients to receive TMP (160 mg)-SMX (800 mg) twice daily either three days per week (group B), or seven days per week (group C), or to receive no treatment (group A). Treatment began 14 days after transplantation and continued for four months. Age, sex, preexisting pulmonary pathology and immunosuppressive protocols did not differ among the groups. Of 17 patients in the control group (A), 7 developed a clinical syndrome compatible with PCP, with the diagnosis histologically confirmed by bronchoalveolar lavage during the first four months following transplantation. In contrast, no patients in either the daily or intermittent therapy groups developed PCP during the study period (P < 0.005). Both doses of TMP-SMX were well tolerated, and discontinuation of therapy was not necessary in any patient. Total white blood cell count, azathioprine dose, and number of treated episodes of rejection per patient did not differ among the three groups. We conclude that TMP-SMX can safely and effectively be administered to prevent the occurrence of P carinii pneumonia during the first four months following cardiac transplantation. The efficacy of ofloxacin in preventing infection in neutropenic patients following cytotoxic chemotherapy was evaluated and was compared with that of co-trimoxazole. A total of 102 patients with hematological malignancies were randomly selected to receive either co-trimoxazole or ofloxacin. All patients were monitored for compliance, occurrence of infection, and drug-related side effects. A surveillance culture of a rectal swab was performed regularly. A total of 25 of the 52 patients (48%) who received co-trimoxazole and 11 of the 50 patients (22%) who received ofloxacin developed fever during the study period (P less than 0.025). Gram-negative bacteremia occurred in nine patients in the co-trimoxazole group (17%) but in only one patient (2%) in the ofloxacin group (P less than 0.05). No patient in either group had documented gram-positive bacterial or Pneumocystis carinii infection. Poor performance status was the only identifiable factor associated with an increased incidence of bacteremia. The surveillance study showed that significantly fewer bacterial strains were resistant to ofloxacin than to co-trimoxazole and that acquisition of resistance to co-trimoxazole was more commonly observed than was acquisition of resistance to ofloxacin. Significantly more patients had skin rashes following co-trimoxazole than ofloxacin treatment (P less than 0.05). Ofloxacin was superior to co-trimoxazole in preventing infection in this population of neutropenic patients. To determine the efficacy of long-term prophylaxis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) for prevention of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, the absorption of TMP-SMZ in transplant patients, the effects of prophylaxis on the microflora, and the cost-benefit of prophylaxis.
                One hundred thirty-two adult patients selected to undergo renal transplantation participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Patients randomized to receive TMP-SMZ experienced fewer hospital days with fever (3.3% versus 7.7%, p less than 0.001) and significantly fewer bacterial infections during the transplant hospitalization after removal of a urethral catheter (0.76 versus 1.88 per 100 days, p less than 0.005) and following discharge from the hospital (0.08 versus 0.30 per 100 days, p less than 0.001). During the transplant hospitalization, a daily dose of 320/1,600 mg was highly effective for prophylaxis whereas 160/800 mg daily gave unexpectedly low blood levels and was effective only for prevention of urinary tract infections after catheter removal. Prophylaxis was most effective in prevention of infections of the urinary tract (24 versus 54, p less than 0.005) and bloodstream (one versus nine, p less than 0.01) and infections caused by enteric gram-negative bacilli (four versus 46, p less than 0.001), enterococci (six versus 22, p = 0.006), or Staphylococcus aureus (one versus nine, p = 0.01). Prophylaxis did not prevent urinary tract infection associated with urethral catheters in the early posttransplant period, but after catheter removal, reduced the risk of urinary tract infection threefold (p less than 0.001). No significant differences in colonization by TMP-SMZ-resistant gram-negative bacilli were identified between the two groups; patients given TMP-SMZ were, paradoxically, less likely to become colonized by candida, probably because of less exposure to antibiotics for treatment of infection. Recipients of prophylaxis did not have a higher rate of infection caused by TMP-SMZ-resistant bacteria or Candida; however, their infections were more likely to be caused by resistant bacteria than infections in patients in the placebo group (62% versus 18%, p less than 0.001).
                Prophylaxis with TMP-SMZ, which is well tolerated, significantly reduces the incidence of bacterial infection following renal transplantation, especially infection of the urinary tract and bloodstream, can provide protection against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and is cost-beneficial. Subnormal absorption of TMP-SMZ in the early posttransplant period mandates 320/1,600 mg daily for optimal benefit. Prophylaxis has little discernible effect on the microflora. Preliminary results are presented of an ongoing, prospective, randomized, study comparing ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin and co-trimoxazole/colistin for the prevention of infection in patients with acute leukaemia. The results for 59 patients (median age 47 years, range 21-72) included 88 episodes of neutropenia, each associated with a course of cytotoxic therapy. The main factor measured was the time elapsed from the beginning of neutropenia (neutrophils less than 500/microliter) until the first infectious febrile episode. The median time for the period was 12 days (range 1-56) for the cotrimoxazole/colistin group, 15 days (range 1-38) for the ofloxacin group and 20 days (range 1-36) for the ciprofloxacin group (differences not significant). Microbiologically proven major infections occurred in 10/27 treatment courses with co-trimoxazole/colistin 7/31 courses with ofloxacin and 7/30 courses with ciprofloxacin (P not significant). These were mostly due to Gram-positive cocci. There were no Gram-negative infections in the quinolone groups compared with one major Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in the co-trimoxazole/colistin group. No Pneumocystis carinii infections were encountered. Adverse reactions associated with co-trimoxazole/colistin required discontinuation of medication in 11/27 treatment courses because of compliance problems, skin reactions or gastrointestinal intolerance. There were significantly fewer discontinuations in the ofloxacin (n = 2) and in the ciprofloxacin groups (n = 3). Major side effects of the quinolones included persistent icterus in one patient receiving ofloxacin and psychiatric symptoms in one patient receiving ciprofloxacin. It is concluded from these data that there were no statistically significant differences between the three treatment groups in respect of the prevention of infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial over a two-year period in patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia to assess the effectiveness of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole given on three consecutive days each week as compared with daily in the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonitis. P. carinii pneumonitis did not develop in any of 92 patients receiving the drug daily (30,602 patient-days) or in any of 74 who received it three consecutive days a week (27,329 patient-days), whereas the incidence of the infection expected without prophylaxis is 21 percent. One patient, excluded from both groups because of an adverse reaction to sulfonamides in the past, acquired P. carinii pneumonitis. Especially noteworthy was a difference in the occurrence of systemic mycoses, with 10 cases in the daily-treatment group and only 1 case in the three-days-a-week group (P = 0.024). No differences were observed in the rates of other infections or adverse effects associated with the drug. We conclude that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is as effective given three days a week as it is given daily in the prevention of P. carinii pneumonitis and that the intermittent schedule has the advantages of less frequent fungal infections and lower cost. Intermittent chemoprophylaxis may be especially beneficial to certain patients who are unable to tolerate the daily doses. The Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) undertook a prospective randomized trial using a single chemotherapy regimen with or without trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (TS). In a previous acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) study of initial therapy, investigators were free to use TS prophylaxis or not. Analysis of those data seemed to favor TS for duration of continuous complete remission. In the study reported here, of 126 randomized patients with ALL, 63 received TS. There was no effect of TS on disease-free survival after 3 years follow-up. Overall severe toxicity did not differ. However, granulocytopenia was somewhat more severe in the TS group. Hepatic toxicity, measured by enzyme elevation approached significance in the TS group versus controls. Some institutions declined randomization and treated with or without TS as a routine. Outcome and toxicities did not differ from randomized patients. There was no statistically significant effect on severe, life-threatening or fatal infection between the randomized TS versus control groups. Children not receiving TS developed varicella more often, a disease for which one would not expect TS to show a preventative effect. Pneumocystis pneumonias were not reported. The authors conclude that TS prophylaxis did not increase the continuous complete remission rate in children with ALL or decrease the incidence of infection. Toxicity is somewhat higher on TS. We conducted a prospective, randomized clinical trial among liver transplant patients to assess the efficacy and safety of weekly sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine compared with daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia. The studied drugs were given during 6 months after transplantation. One hundred twenty patients were included. None of the 60 patients receiving weekly sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine developed Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, whereas two cases (3%) developed among the 60 patients who received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. For both patients, the studied medication had been discontinued several weeks earlier because of adverse effects. No differences were observed in the incidence of adverse effects. We conclude that weekly sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine is as effective and safe as is daily trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia after liver transplantation. Pneumonia due to Pneumocystis carinii is an infrequent complication following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) which is associated with a high mortality. Although administration of trimethoprim/sulfa- methoxazole (TMP/SMX) is an effective prophylactic strategy for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), treatment-associated toxicity frequently results in discontinuation of therapy. We have conducted a prospective randomized trial comparing atovaquone, a new anti-Pneumocystis agent, with TMP/SMX for PCP prophylaxis following autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. Thirty-nine patients were studied. Twenty patients received atovaquone suspension and 19 patients received TMP/SMX. The median ages were 44 (range 20-68) and 47 (range 32-63) years, respectively. A similar number of patients with solid tumors (14 vs 15) and hematologic malignancies (five vs five) were treated in each group. Either TMP/SMX (160/800 mg) or atovaquone (1500 mg) was administered daily from transplant day -5 until day -1, discontinued from day 0 to engraftment, then resumed 3 days per week until day +100 post-transplant. The median time to engraftment (ANC >0.5 x 109/l) was similar in both groups. Eighty percent of the patients randomized to atovaquone prophylaxis completed the study. Four atovaquone-treated patients were removed from study; two patients (10%) did not receive a transplant and two patients (10%) were removed due to a protocol violation. None of the 16 patients treated with atovaquone experienced treatment-associated adverse effects. Of the 19 patients randomized to receive TMP/SMX, 55% completed the study. Nine TMP/SMX-treated patients were removed from the study; one patient (5%) did not receive a transplant and eight patients (40%) were removed due to drug intolerance (P < 0.003). The rate of intolerance to TMP/SMX led to the early discontinuation of this randomized trial. Intolerance of TMP/SMX included elevated transaminase levels (n = 1), nausea or vomiting (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2) and neutropenia (n = 2). All episodes of TMP/SMP intolerance occurred following transplantation after a median duration of 17.5 (range 2-48) days and a median of 7 (range 1-20) doses. Resolution of adverse side-effects occurred in all eight patients within a median of 7 (range 2-20) days following discontinuation of therapy. Neither PCP nor bacterial infections were identified in any of the patients treated. This prospective randomized study demonstrated that atovaquone is well-tolerated for anti-Pneumocystis prophylaxis in autologous PBSC transplant patients intolerant of TMP/SMX. Prophylaxis with low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole has been shown to be cost-effective in the prevention of urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, urosepsis, and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. Ciprofloxacin, effective against almost all urinary tract pathogens in this patient population, represents a promising alternative prophylactic agent for patients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole due to toxicity.
                We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare low-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole with ciprofloxacin for the prevention of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients. Patients received either ciprofloxacin (250 mg) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (80 mg trimethoprim, 400 mg sulfamethoxazole) daily for 6 months following transplantation. Treatment was considered successful if patients completed the 6-month course and 3-month follow-up period without evidence of urinary tract infection or drug-related toxicities.
                Of 103 eligible patients, 51 received ciprofloxacin and 52 received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. At 6 months, treatment was successful in 75% (38 of 51) receiving ciprofloxacin and 71% (37 of 52) treated with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.87, relative risk 1.04, 95% confidence limits 0.83 to 1.33). Thirteen patients (25%) receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole withdrew from the study-4 for resistant urinary tract infection and 9 for drug-related toxicity, while 3 (6%) of the patients receiving ciprofloxacin withdrew because of drug-related toxicity (P = 0.016, relative risk of urinary tract infection or adverse event 0.24, 95% confidence limits 0.07 to 0.78). At 9 months, all 38 patients who completed the 6-month course of ciprofloxacin remained free of urinary tract infection, while an additional 4 patients who had received trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis (total of 8 patients over the 9 months) developed urinary tract infections (P = 0.006, Fisher's exact test for urinary tract infection alone). Pneumocystis pneumonia occurred in a total of 7 (14%) patients who were randomized to ciprofloxacin, but 2 of the 7 had withdrawn from the study at least 2 weeks prior to the diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia. There were no cases of pneumocystis pneumonia in patients receiving trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (P = 0.006). Following completion of the study, monthly aerosolized pentamidine administered in conjunction with ciprofloxacin has provided complete protection against urinary tract infection and pneumocystis pneumonia in 30 transplant recipients unable to tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy.
                Ciprofloxacin is at least as effective as trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in the prevention of urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients, and is better tolerated. Ciprofloxacin prophylaxis is associated with a higher incidence of pneumocystis pneumonia than is trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole therapy. An uncontrolled follow-up study suggests that ciprofloxacin prophylaxis combined with monthly aerosolized pentamidine may be efficacious in preventing both urinary tract infection and pneumocystis pneumonia in renal transplant recipients. In a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled study to evaluate the efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, we studied 160 patients with cancer who were at high risk for this pneumonia over a two-year period. Seventeen of the 80 patients receiving a placebo acquired P. carinii pneumonitis, whereas none of the 80 given 150 mg of trimethoprim and 750 mg of sulfamethoxazole per square meter per day had the infection P less than 0.01). Bacterial sepsis, pneumonia other than that caused by P. carinii, acute otitis media, upper-respiratory-tract infections, sinusitis and cellulitis occurred less frequently in recipients of the drug than in the placebo group (P less than 0.01 in each case). Oral candidiasis was the only adverse effect ecountered from trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole administration. The study shows the combination to be highly effective in the prevention of P. carinii pneumonitis. We assessed the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics in children receiving intensive chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The patients were randomized to receive either trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) or placebo in a double-blind trial. Thirty patients were evaluated in each group. Children receiving TMP-SMX had fewer episodes of bacteremia (0 vs. 5) and otitis media (3 vs. 18). The geometric mean of the neutrophil nadir was 172 in the TMP-SMX group and 287 in controls. However, no increased delay or dose reduction of chemotherapy was observed in the TMP-SMX treated patients. Five patients who received TMP-SMX developed Gram-negative rods resistant to TMP-SMX on surveillance stool cultures. We conclude that TMP-SMX prophylaxis decreased certain bacterial infections in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia without causing clinically significant toxicity. The emergence of Gram-negative rods resistant to TMP-SMX in treated patients suggests that TMP-SMX prophylaxis should be restricted to patients who are at high risk for developing a bacterial infection or Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia.
Given an event rate of 7.5% in the included trials' control group, prophylaxis for PCP using TMP/SMX is highly effective among non-HIV immunocompromised patients, with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome of 15 patients (95% CI 13 to 20). Prophylaxis should be considered for patients with hematological malignancies, bone marrow transplantation and solid organ transplantation included in these trials.