Usefulness of piretanide plus ramipril for systemic hypertension: a multicenter trial. Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial. First-line therapy option with low-dose bisoprolol fumarate and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with stage I and stage II systemic hypertension. A multifactorial trial design to assess combination therapy in hypertension. Treatment with bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide. A comparison of a combination of penbutolol and frusemide with the two compounds individually in the treatment of hypertension. Comparison of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide alone and in combination in mild to moderate essential hypertension. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination therapy with losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Losartan and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of concomitant administration compared with individual components. Once-daily treatment of essential hypertension with captopril. Controlled multicenter study of the antihypertensive effects of lisinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of 394 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Evaluation of antihypertensive therapy with the combination of olmesartan medoxomil and hydrochlorothiazide. Combined versus single effect of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensive patients. Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Moxonidine and hydrochlorothiazide in combination: a synergistic antihypertensive effect. Aliskiren, an orally effective renin inhibitor, provides antihypertensive efficacy alone and in combination with valsartan. Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults. Use of the factorial design and quadratic response surface models to evaluate the fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in hypertension. Quinapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and combination in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Double-blind comparison of antihypertensive treatment with ramipril and piretanide, given alone or in combination. Matrix study of irbesartan with hydrochlorothiazide in mild-to-moderate hypertension. A dose escalation trial comparing the combination of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide with the monotherapies in patients with essential hypertension. A comparison of initial treatment with losartan/HCTZ versus losartan monotherapy in chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Antihypertensive effectiveness of low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination. A large multicenter study. Lisinopril-Hydrochlorothiazide Group. Double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of trandolapril 2 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Investigator Study Group. Valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide in patients with essential hypertension. A multiple dose, double-blind, placebo controlled trial comparing combination therapy with monotherapy. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy with irbesartan and HCTZ monotherapy in the treatment of moderate hypertension. The effect of perindopril and hydrochlorothiazide alone and in combination on blood pressure and on the renin-angiotensin system in hypertensive subjects. [Effectiveness and tolerance of combined verapamil retard and hydrochlorothiazide. Results of a double-blind, randomized study]. Study of the efficacy and safety of the combination ramipril 2.5 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. ATHES Study Group. A randomized, controlled trial comparing diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in the therapy of essential hypertension. Double-blind, parallel, comparative multicentre study of a new combination of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide with individual components in patients with mild or moderate hypertension. Treatment of hypertension by enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide separately and together: a multicenter study. Comparative study of once-daily administration of captopril 50 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg and their combination in mild to moderate hypertension. Lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide combination compared with the monocomponents in elderly hypertensive patients. Placebo-controlled comparison of the effects of nebivolol and low-dose hydrochlorothiazide as monotherapies and in combination on blood pressure and lipid profile in hypertensive patients. Controlled multicenter study with quinapril, hydrochlorothiazide, and combination in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Renin inhibition with aliskiren provides additive antihypertensive efficacy when used in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. Dose-finding study of candesartan cilexetil plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A comparison of the efficacy of cilazapril versus cilazapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Inhibace General Practice Study Group. Effects of benazepril and hydrochlorothiazide, given alone and in low- and high-dose combinations, on blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
To test the dose responses of piretanide, ramipril, and their combination in patients with essential hypertension, a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in 480 patients. Twelve separate groups were studied: placebo, piretanide 3 mg, piretanide 6 mg, ramipril 2.5 mg, ramipril 5 mg, ramipril 10 mg, and their combinations, as single daily morning doses. Patients were randomized after a 2-week run-in period without drugs; treatment was given for 6 weeks. A dose response compared with placebo was found for both drugs; the combination was more effective than either drug alone. Piretanide 6 mg, combined with ramipril 5 mg, provided optimal blood pressure reduction. Self-reported adverse effects of both drugs and their combinations did not exceed those reported for placebo. A surface analysis suggested that piretanide primarily reduced systolic blood pressure, whereas ramipril was more effective in reducing diastolic blood pressure. The data attest to a combined efficacy of piretanide and ramipril in decreasing arterial blood pressure. Combination therapy with at least 2 antihypertensive agents is usually needed to achieve appropriate blood pressure (BP) control in patients with isolated or predominant systolic hypertension. A currently recommended combination is a diuretic added to an angiotensin-receptor blocker.
                This was a study of the effects on sitting systolic BP (SBP)of 2 combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension (SBP > or =160 mm Hg and < or =200 mm Hg) with or without other cardiovascular risk factors.
                After a placebo run-in period, patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with either valsartan 80 mg OD(monotherapy group) or valsartan 160 mg OD (combination-therapy groups) for 4 weeks, followed by forced titration to valsartan 160 mg OD (V160), valsartan 160 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg OD (V160 +HCTZ12.5), or valsartan 160 mg plus HCTZ 25 mg OD (V160 +HCTZ25) for an additional 4 weeks. End points were the change in SBP between the groups receiving combination therapy and the monotherapy group, between-group changes in diastolic BP (DBP), responder rates (SBP <140 mm Hg or a reduction in SBP of > or =20 mm Hg), and tolerability.
                A total of 774 patients were randomized to treatment: 261 to V160, 258 to V160+HCTZ12.5, and 255 to V160 +HCTZ25. The intent-to-treat population consisted of 767 patients (411 men, 356 women; mean age, 60 years; mean weight, 84 kg; clinic mean [SD] baseline BP, 167.5 [8.1]/93.4 [9.1] mm Hg). All treatments produced significant reductions in SBP from baseline (mean [SD] reduction, 20.7 [15.7] mm Hg with V160, 27.9 [13.8] mm Hg with V160 +HCTZ12.5, and 28.3 [13.1] mm Hg with V160+HCTZ25; all, P < 0.05). DBP was reduced by 6.6 (8.9) mm Hg in the V160 group and by 10.2 (7.7) and 10.1 (7.8) mm Hg in the V160+HCTZ12.5 and V160 +HCTZ25 groups, respectively (all, P < 0.05). The additional reductions in BP with V160+HCTZ25 did not reach statistical significance compared with V160+HCTZ12.5. Responder rates were 56.9% in the V160 group, 74.4% in the V160+HCTZ12.5 group, and 75.0% in the V160 +HCTZ25 group P < 0.05, combination therapy vs monotherapy). Adverse events were reported by 27.5% of patients in the monotherapy group, compared with 28.6% and 34.0% in the groups that received V160+HCTZ12.5 and V160+HCTZ25, respectively; the differences were not significant between treatment groups.
                Monotherapy with V160 was effective in these patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension. Significant additional reductions in SBP and DBP and an increase in responder rates were achieved with the addition to V160 of HCTZ12.5 and HCTZ25, with no significant effect on tolerability. This 30-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was designed to (1) establish that 6.25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) given once daily with 5 mg of bisoprolol fumarate can contribute to antihypertensive effectiveness in patients with stage I and stage II (mild to moderate) systemic hypertension; and (2) assess whether this formulation was more effective or possessed a safety advantage over standard monotherapy with bisoprolol or 25 mg of HCTZ. Results showed that HCTZ 6.25 mg contributed significantly to the antihypertensive effectiveness of bisoprolol 5 mg. Bisoprolol 5 mg/HCTZ 6.25 mg (B5/H6.25) produced significantly greater mean reductions from baseline in sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (-15.8 mm Hg/-12.6 mm Hg) than bisoprolol 5 mg alone (-10.0 mm Hg/-10.5 mm Hg) and HCTZ 25 mg alone (-10.2 mm Hg/-8.5 mm Hg). A 73% response rate was achieved with the low-dose formulation compared with 61% for the bisoprolol 5 mg (B5) group and 47% for the HCTZ 25 mg (H25) group. B5/H6.25 was found to be significantly more effective than B5 or H25 in all subgroups of patients, regardless of gender, race, age, or smoking history. Antihypertensive effects were maintained during the 24-hour dosing interval. The incremental effectiveness of B5/H6.25 was not accompanied by an increase in the frequency or severity of adverse experiences; the incidence of adverse experiences in the B5/H6.25 group was comparable to that in the placebo group. B5/H6.25 was shown to provide safety advantages over H25, as shown by less hypokalemia (< 1% with B5/H6.25 versus 6.5% with H25).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The safety and effectiveness of different dosages and combinations of antihypertensive agents can be efficiently studied using a multifactorial trial design. In consultation with the Cardio-Renal Division of the Food and Drug Administration, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3 x 4 factorial trial of bisoprolol, a beta 1-selective adrenergic blocking agent, and hydrochlorothiazide.
                A total of 512 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to once-daily treatment with bisoprolol (0, 2.5, 10, or 40 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (0, 6.25, or 25 mg), and all possible combinations. Diastolic and systolic blood pressures were monitored during this 12-week trial.
                The effects of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide were additive with respect to reductions in diastolic and systolic blood pressures over the dosage ranges studied. The addition of hydrochlorothiazide (or bisoprolol) to therapy with bisoprolol (or hydrochlorothiazide) produced an incremental reduction in blood pressure. Dosages of hydrochlorothiazide as low as 6.25 mg/d contributed a significant antihypertensive effect. A hydrochlorothiazide dosage of 6.25 mg/d produced significantly less hypokalemia and less of an increase in uric acid levels than a dosage of 25 mg/d. The low-dose combination of bisoprolol, 2.5 mg/d, and hydrochlorothiazide, 6.25 mg/d, reduced diastolic blood pressure to lower than 90 mm Hg in 61% of patients and demonstrated a safety profile that compared favorably with that of placebo.
                The utility of factorial design trials to characterize dose-response relationships and to test the potential interactions between various antihypertensive agents has been demonstrated. The combination of low dosages of bisoprolol and hydrochlorothiazide may be a rational alternative to conventional stepped-care therapy for the initial treatment of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Forty-one patients completed a randomized, double-blind, between-group comparison of a combination of penbutolol and frusemide, with penbutolol alone, and frusemide alone in the management of mild to moderate essential hypertension. The results suggest that the combination caused a superior reduction in systolic and diastolic pressure compared with penbutolol and a superior reduction in systolic blood pressure compared with frusemide. 1 A placebo-controlled, randomised double-blind comparison of captopril 25 mg three times a day, hydrochlorothiazide 15 mg three times a day, and the combination was conducted in 207 patients with essential hypertension with supine diastolic blood pressures of 92-110 mm Hg. Significant decreases in blood pressure were seen in all three groups; the magnitude of decrease seen with captopril and hydrochlorothiazide was similar, while the combination produced an additive response greater (p less than 0.001) than captopril or hydrochlorothiazide alone. 2 The major side effect reported was a rash in fewer than 6% of patients taking captopril alone or in combination. Loss of taste or proteinuria was not observed. 3 The addition of captopril of hydrochlorothiazide blunted the hypokalaemia and hyperuricaemia observed with hydrochlorothiazide alone in addition to its antihypertensive synergy. These observations indicate that this relatively low dose of captopril is safe and efficacious in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension alone and particularly when combined with a thiazide diuretic. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of 8-week treatment with one of three fixed-dose combinations-losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg, losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg, or losartan 25 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg-in comparison with those of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg alone, losartan 50 mg alone, or placebo in Japanese patients with essential hypertension. Significant reductions in sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were seen in all three combination groups compared with the placebo group (each p<0.001). The greatest reductions in DBP and SBP were observed in the losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg group (12.7 and 18.0 mmHg, respectively). The reductions in the losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg group were significantly greater (each p<0.001) than those in the placebo group and each of the monotherapy groups. There were no significant differences in the incidences of clinical and laboratory drug-related adverse events between any of the combination groups and the placebo group. All combination groups showed improved hypokalemia and hyperuricemia compared to the hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg group. These results demonstrated that once-daily, fixed-dose combination therapy with losartan 50 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg is well tolerated and more efficacious in lowering DBP and SBP than monotherapy in Japanese hypertensive patients. Angiotensin II acts at the cellular level through specific angiotensin II subtype I, AT-1 receptors. Losartan is the first of a new class of antihypertensive agents that specifically block angiotensin II at AT-1 receptors. By acting on complementary and different pharmacologic mechanisms, the concomitant use of low doses of hydrochlorothiazide with losartan may offer an additive antihypertensive activity with fewer adverse experiences.
                This double-blind study evaluated losartan concomitantly administered with hydrochlorothiazide as initial therapy in 703 patients with essential hypertension.
                The greatest reduction in blood pressure was observed in the 50 mg of losartan potassium and 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide group (17.2 mm Hg in sitting systolic blood pressure and 13.2 mm Hg in sitting diastolic blood pressure [P < or = .001]), and the effects of the two components appeared to be additive. Seventy-eight percent of the patients treated with 50 mg of losartan potassium and 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide had an excellent or good antihypertensive response (sitting diastolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg or > or = 90 mm Hg with a reduction of 10 mm Hg or more). Peak (6 hours after dosing) and trough placebo-adjusted ratios for the losartan-hydrochlorothiazide groups ranged from 62% to 85%, indicating that there was a smooth reduction in sitting diastolic blood pressure that was sustained over 24 hours. The most common clinical adverse experiences (> or = 4%) that occurred with an incidence slightly greater than that reported by the placebo-treated patients were headache, asthenia or fatigue, dizziness, sinusitis, and upper respiratory infection.
                The concomitant administration of losartan potassium, 50 mg, with 12.5 mg of hydrochlorothiazide once daily produced an additive reduction in trough sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure and was well tolerated. After a 4- to 6-week placebo lead-in period, 382 mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients with diastolic blood pressures remaining between 92 and 109 mmHg were randomized to double-blind treatment with captopril (50 mg q.d.) (94), captopril (50 mg b.i.d.) (97), captopril (50 mg q.d.) plus hydrochlorothiazide (97), and placebo (94). After 4 weeks the captopril dosage was doubled, whereas the hydrochlorothiazide dose remained at 25 mg for an additional 4 weeks. Response to treatment was evaluated by means of blood pressure determinations at the end of 4 and 8 weeks. All three active treatment regimens reduced diastolic blood pressure more than placebo did (p less than or equal to 0.01). Patients receiving captopril with diuretic had a greater decrease in pressure than those receiving captopril alone. The once-daily captopril regimen was as effective as the twice-daily regimen, although the latter employed double the daily dose. Increasing the captopril dosage during the second 4-week period resulted in a minimal addition reduction in blood pressure. Full 24-hour monitoring confirmed that the blood pressure was controlled by once-daily captopril therapy. Captopril given once daily, alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, is efficacious treatment for patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The once-daily regimen should further enhance patient compliance. Lisinopril (LIS) is a lysine analog of enalaprilat, the active metabolite of enalapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). Unlike enalapril, the precursor of enalaprilat, LIS is not a prodrug but has equal ACEI efficacy and potency and a slightly longer duration of action after oral administration. Short-term (12 weeks) and long-term (24 weeks) blood pressure control has been studied with LIS, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), and LIS + HCTZ when given once a day. Drug treatment had three phases: (i) 2-4 weeks of single-blind placebo washout; (ii) 12 weeks of double-blind comparison therapy with LIS 20, 40, and 80 mg vs. HCTZ 12.5, 25, and 50 mg, vs. LIS + HCTZ 20 + 12.5, 40 + 25, and 80 + 50 mg; (iii) 13-24 weeks single-blind LIS vs. LIS + HCTZ. Starting double-blind therapy at the lowest dose, all three groups doubled the dose at weeks 4 and 8 if BP was not controlled with sitting diastolic BP (SDBP) less than 90 mm Hg. At the end of 12 weeks of double-blind therapy, uncontrolled HCTZ-only and LIS-only treatment groups were advanced to combination LIS + HCTZ therapy but uncontrolled LIS + HCTZ patients were dropped. Mean BP reductions (systolic/diastolic, mm Hg) for all three groups after 12 weeks of double-blind comparison therapy were: (i) LIS (n = 162), -16.6/-12.5; (ii) HCTZ (n = 155), -10.4/-6.8; (iii) LIS + HCTZ (n = 74), -23.9/-18.2 with p less than 0.01 for all groups compared to baseline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Most patients with hypertension require more than one agent to control blood pressure (BP). The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the angiotensin II receptor blocker olmesartan medoxomil in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).
                This was a randomized, double-blind, factorial design study. After a placebo run-in period, eligible patients (n = 502) with a baseline mean seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) of 100 to 115 mm Hg were randomized to one of 12 groups: placebo, olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy (10, 20, or 40 mg/day, HCTZ monotherapy (12.5 or 25 mg/day), or one of six groups of olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combination therapy. The primary endpoint was the change in mean trough SeDBP from baseline at week 8. Statistical analyses were conducted to determine whether at least one combination produced a larger reduction in SeDBP at week 8 than the individual corresponding component doses, but did not compare BP reductions with different combination doses.
                Olmesartan medoxomil plus HCTZ produced greater reductions in both SeDBP and seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) at week 8 than did monotherapy with either component. All olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combinations significantly reduced SeDBP and SeSBP compared with placebo in a dose-dependent manner. Reductions from baseline in mean trough SeSBP/SeDBP were 3.3/8.2 mm Hg, 20.1/16.4 mm Hg, and 26.8/21.9 mm Hg with placebo, olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 20/12.5 mg, and olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ 40/25 mg, respectively. All treatments were well tolerated.
                Olmesartan medoxomil/HCTZ combination therapy produced BP reductions of up to 26.8/21.9 mm Hg and was well tolerated. The antihypertensive effect and safety of fosinopril and hydrochlorothiazide combined were compared with each drug singly and placebo in a controlled manner. After a 4- to 5-week placebo lead-in period, 67 mild to moderate essential hypertensive patients (seated diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 and < or = 110 mm Hg) were randomized in a double-blind fashion into four parallel treatment groups: 20 mg fosinopril plus 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, 20 mg fosinopril, 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide, and placebo during 8 weeks. Patients were seen biweekly. Sitting diastolic blood pressure was the outcome variable defining therapeutic response. The efficacy of fosinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide as a combined therapy was superior to any single drug (P < .05) and placebo (P < .01) in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Mean adjusted systolic/diastolic blood pressure decrements at week 8 were -18.8/-13.7, -12.9/-11.8, -8.5/-9.3, and -2.7/-6.9 mm Hg for the fosinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide, fosinopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and placebo groups, respectively. Clinical adverse events and laboratory changes documented throughout the study were similar to placebo and were mild in severity in all groups. Recent surveys reveal continuing deficiencies in the awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension. In many cases, failure to achieve blood pressure targets may be attributable to the use of antihypertensive monotherapy.
                This study was undertaken to identify combinations of telmisartan, a new oral angiotensin II type 1-receptor antagonist, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) that might provide greater antihypertensive efficacy than monotherapy with either agent in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. It also examined the dose-response surface for the 2 drugs alone and in combination.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study that employed all cells of a 4 x 5 factorial design. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, men and women between 18 and 80 years of age with mild to moderate hypertension (defined as mean supine diastolic blood pressure [DBP] between 95 and 114 mm Hg during the last 2 weeks of the placebo run-in period and systolic blood pressure [SBP] between 114 and 200 mm Hg immediately before randomization) were eligible to enter the 8-week, double-blind, double-dummy treatment period. Study comparisons were between once-daily telmisartan monotherapy (20, 40, 80, or 160 mg), HCTZ monotherapy (6.25, 12.5, or 25 mg), 12 combinations of these telmisartan/HCTZ doses, and placebo. The focus was on 2 combinations: telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg and telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. The primary efficacy variable was change in supine trough DBP from baseline to the last evaluable measurement during double-blind treatment. Plasma renin activity and safety parameters, including treatment-emergent adverse events, physical findings, electrocardiograms, and serum electrolyte levels (which are known to increase with HCTZ treatment), were also assessed.
                Of 1293 patients screened, 818 (63.3%) were enrolled at 47 centers. Of these 818, 749 (91.6%) completed the study. The intent-to-treat population (randomized with > or = 1 postrandomization blood pressure measurement) consisted of 807 patients (98.7%). Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg significantly decreased mean supine trough SBP/DBP by 23.9/14.9 mm Hg, a benefit of 8.5/3.4 mm Hg compared with telmisartan 80 mg and of 17.0/7.6 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (both comparisons, P < 0.01). Telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg significantly reduced mean supine SBP by 18.8 mm Hg, a benefit of 6.6 mm Hg compared with telmisartan 40 mg and 11.9 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (both, P < 0.01). This same combination significantly reduced mean supine DBP by 12.6 mm Hg, a benefit of 5.3 mm Hg compared with HCTZ 12.5 mg (P < 0.01), but was not significantly different from telmisartan 40 mg. Telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg was significantly more effective than telmisartan 40 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg in reducing mean supine DBP and SBP (both, P < 0.05). The response surface and responder analyses confirmed the additive antihypertensive efficacy of the combination of telmisartan and HCTZ. All regimens were well tolerated.
                Once-daily telmisartan 80 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg was effective and well tolerated when used to reduce SBP and DBP in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. In addition to enhancing efficacy, this combination protected against potassium depletion, a common side effect of thiazide monotherapy. This study was designed as a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, prospectively randomized study comparing, after a 4-week placebo run-in phase, moxonidine 0.4 mg once daily (o.d.), hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg o.d., and the combination of the two with placebo. A total of 160 patients were analyzed in an intent-to-treat analysis. Moxonidine 0.4 mg o.d. was effective in significantly lowering blood pressure in this group of mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients in comparison with placebo. The efficacy and the side-effect profile of moxonidine were comparable to those of the first-line antihypertensive agent hydrochlorothiazide. The combination of moxonidine and hydrochlorothiazide in the same dosage as a monotherapy improves efficacy significantly without additive effects on the safety profile. Response rate after monotherapies was calculated with 70.3 and 70.0%, respectively, after combination treatment in 87.8% of all patients in the treatment group. The trial gives support to a recommended dosage regimen of moxonidine 0.4 mg o.d. This profile of moxonidine is highly comparable to a standard first-line antihypertensive drug such as hydrochlorothiazide, without sacrificing tolerance and safety for increased efficacy, in combination with hydrochlorothiazide. By blocking the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at its rate-limiting step, renin inhibition may provide improved RAAS suppression. We investigated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of the oral direct renin inhibitor aliskiren, alone or in combination with the angiotensin receptor blocker valsartan.
                In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, 8-week trial, 1123 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension underwent a 3 to 4 week single-blind placebo run-in and were then randomized in a modified factorial study design to receive once-daily, double-blind oral treatment with placebo, aliskiren monotherapy (75, 150, or 300 mg), valsartan monotherapy (80, 160, or 320 mg), aliskiren and valsartan in combination, or valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (160/12.5 mg). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic BP (DBP) at endpoint.
                Once-daily oral treatment with aliskiren 300 mg significantly (P < .0001) lowered mean sitting DBP and systolic BP (SBP) compared with placebo; aliskiren monotherapy demonstrated a safety and tolerability profile comparable to placebo. Changes in DBP and SBP were fitted to a first-order dose-response surface (lack-of-fit test, P = .65), which showed that aliskiren and valsartan alone and in combination produced dose-related reductions in DBP and SBP. Coadministration of aliskiren and valsartan produced a greater antihypertensive effect than either drug alone, comparable in magnitude to the effect of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide, with similar tolerability to the component monotherapies and to placebo.
                Aliskiren monotherapy provides antihypertensive efficacy and placebo-like tolerability in patients with hypertension. Aliskiren and valsartan in combination may provide additive BP-lowering effects with maintained tolerability. One third of patients treated for hypertension attain adequate blood pressure (BP) control, and multidrug regimens are often required. Given the lifelong nature of hypertension, there is a need to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of higher doses of combination anti-hypertensive therapies.
                This study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of valsartan (VAL) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)-monotherapy and higher-dose combinations in patients with essential hypertension.
                The first part of this study was an 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group trial. Patients with essential hypertension (mean sitting diastolic BP [MSDBP], > or =95 mm Hg and <110 mm Hg) were randomized to 1 of 8 treatment groups: VAL 160 or 320 mg; HCTZ 12.5 or 25 mg; VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5, 320/12.5, or 320/25 mg; or placebo. Mean changes in MSDBP and mean sitting systolic BP (MSSBP) were analyzed at the 8-week core study end point. VAL/HCTZ 320/12.5 and 320/25 mg were further investigated in a 54-week, open-label extension. Response was defined as MSDBP <90 mm Hg or a > or =10 mm Hg decrease compared to baseline. Control was defined as MSDBP <90 mm Hg compared with baseline. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring adverse events at randomization and all subsequent study visits and regular evaluation of hematology and blood chemistry.
                A total of 1346 patients were randomized into the 8-week core study (734 men, 612 women; 924 white, 291 black, 23 Asian, 108 other; mean age, 52.7 years; mean weight, 92.6 kg). All active treatments were associated with significantly reduced MSSBP and MSDBP during the core 8-week study, with each monotherapy significantly contributing to the overall effect of combination therapy (VAL and HCTZ, P < 0.001). Each combination was associated with significantly greater reductions in MSSBP and MSDBP compared with the monotherapies and placebo (all, P < 0.001). The mean reduction in MSSBP/MSDBP with VAL/HCTZ 320/25 mg was 24.7/16.6 mm Hg, compared with 5.9/7.0 mm Hg with placebo. The reduction in MSSBP was significantly greater with VAL/HCTZ 320/25 mg compared with VAL/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg (P < 0.002). Rates of response and BP control were significantly higher in the groups that received combination treatment compared with those that received monotherapy. The incidence of hypokalemia was lower with VAL/HCTZ combinations (1.8%-6.1%) than with HCTZ monotherapies (7.1%-13.3%). The majority of adverse events in the core study were of mild to moderate severity. The efficacy and tolerability of VAL/HCTZ combinations were maintained during the extension (797 patients).
                In this study population, combination therapies with VAL/HCTZ were associated with significantly greater BP reductions compared with either monotherapy, were well tolerated, and were associated with less hypokalemia than HCTZ alone. The combination of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and thiazide diuretic has advantages over monotherapy for the treatment of hypertension. Previous study designs have often been inadequate to demonstrate the details of interactions between these antihypertensive agents. This study used a modified 4 x 4 factorial randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group design to study the efficacy of 17 different doses of fosinopril (Fos), a phosphinic acid derived ACE inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in 550 patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Data from these variables were fit to quadratic response surface models (QRSM) using polynomial functions in the doses of the two components. Using QRSM, seated systolic (SeSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) responses at 8 weeks were predicted for actual doses and interpolated for intermediate doses not studied. Fos and HCTZ alone and in combination produced a dose-related reduction in SeSBP and SeDBP. Using 10 mg Fos + 12.5 mg HCTZ reduced the adjusted mean SeDBP 6.3 mm Hg and 20 mg Fos + 12.5 mg HCTZ lowered the same measure 9.1 mm Hg. Coadministration of Fos and HCTZ produced an additive antihypertensive effect. This study of combination agents for hypertension using a factorial design with QRSM accurately predicts dose responses and is a valuable clinical trial methodology. This 8-week, double-blind, multicentre study compared the efficacy and safety of the combination of quinapril and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with each drug as monotherapy. Outpatients with moderate to severe hypertension defined as supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 105 mmHg and < or = 120 mmHg at the end of a 2 to 4-week placebo-baseline period were randomly assigned to one of the three treatments: once-daily 10 mg quinapril plus 12.5 mg HCTZ or monotherapy with these doses. After 4 weeks, the doses were to be doubled for the remaining 4 weeks. Three hundred and sixty-eight patients were randomized to double-blind medication; 346 completed the study. Seven patients withdrew due to lack of efficacy. Four patients withdrew due to side effects. In all three treatment groups, clinically significant reductions in DBP were achieved. Combination therapy was statistically more effective than each component taken as monotherapy. Adverse events were infrequent in all treatment groups. No patients experienced symptomatic hypotension or orthostatic hypotension. In a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of the fixed combination of 5 mg ramipril and 6 mg piretanide and the respective component monotherapies in hypertensive patients [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 100-114 mm Hg]. After a single-blind run-in period on placebo, 611 patients were randomized to ramipril (n = 209), piretanide (n = 201), or the combination therapy (n = 201). At randomization, the three groups had the same characteristics (51% men, age 55 +/- 10 years, BP 165 +/- 18/104 +/- 6 mm Hg). At 4 weeks, BP decreased more with combined therapy than with monotherapy. As compared with piretanide monotherapy, the gain in the antihypertensive effect in the supine position averaged 2.1 mm Hg [90% confidence interval (CI) -0.8-5.0 mm Hg; p = 0.07] systolic BP (SBP) and 1.9 mm Hg (CI 0.3-3.5 mm Hg, p = 0.02) DBP and, as compared with ramipril monotherapy, these differences were 4.2 mm Hg (CI 1.3-7.0 mm Hg, p = 0.008) and 2.0 mm Hg (CI 0.5-3.6 mm Hg, p = 0.009). The incidence of adverse events (AE) and the changes in biochemical measurements were similar in the three treatment groups with the exception of spontaneously reported polyuria and serum uric acid concentration. Polyuria was reported more frequently (p < 0.001) with piretanide therapy (n = 23) and combined therapy (n = 19) than with ramipril therapy (n = 1).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and antihypertensive dose-response effects of irbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. After a 4- to 5-week single-blind placebo lead-in period, 683 patients with seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) between 95 and 110 mm Hg were randomized to receive once-daily dosing with one of 16 different double-blind, fixed combinations of irbesartan (0, 37.5, 100, and 300 mg irbesartan) and HCTZ (0, 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg HCTZ) for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in trough SeDBP after 8 weeks of therapy. Data were analyzed by response surface modeling. At Week 8, mean changes from baseline in trough SeDBP (mm Hg) ranged from -3.5 for placebo, -7.1 to -10.2 for the irbesartan monotherapy groups, -5.1 to -8.3 for the HCTZ monotherapy groups, and -8.1 to -15.0 for the combination groups. Irbesartan plus HCTZ produced additive reductions in both SeDBP and seated systolic BP, with at least one combination producing greater BP reduction than either drug alone (P < .001). All treatments were well tolerated; there were no treatment-related serious adverse events. Irbesartan tended to ameliorate the dose-related biochemical abnormalities associated with HCTZ alone. In conclusion, the combination of HCTZ in doses up to 25 mg with irbesartan, in doses up to 300 mg, is safe and produces dose-dependent reductions in BP. A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled parallel group study comparing various doses of the combination diltiazem SR (DTZ SR)/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with the monotherapies was performed to delineate the optimal antihypertensive dosage of the two drug combinations. The study was carried out in 298 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension (stable supine diastolic blood pressure, DBP, greater than or equal to 95 and less than or equal to 110 mmHg). After a single-blind placebo lead-in period lasting 4-6 weeks to establish stable baseline BP, the patients were randomised to receive either placebo (n = 75), HCTZ (n = 76), DTZ SR (n = 72), or the combination of DTZ SR/HCTZ (n = 75). There were three 4-week evaluation periods with forced escalation of therapy as follows: HCTZ (6.25, 6.25, 12.5 mg twice daily), DTZ SR (60, 90, 120 mg twice daily), and the combination of DTZ SR/HCTZ (60/6.25, 90/6.25, 120/12.5 mg twice daily). DTZ SR/HCTZ (120/12.5 mg) produced statistically significantly greater reductions in supine DBP compared with each monotherapy and placebo. The lower doses of DTZ SR/HCTZ (60/6.25 mg and 90/6.25 mg) produced statistically significantly greater supine DBP reductions compared with DTZ SR monotherapy and placebo, but not compared with HCTZ monotherapy. A comparison of reduction in supine DBP between evaluation periods demonstrated a dose-response relationship for the combination therapy in reducing BP over the dosage range studied. Adverse clinical and laboratory events were not significantly different between the therapies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and losartan monotherapy as initial treatment were compared in a double-blind trial in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. Patients were randomised to initial treatment with either losartan/HCTZ (50 mg/12.5 mg) or losartan alone (50 mg). The doses were doubled after four weeks if diastolic blood pressure (SiDBP)was >90 mmHg. Both losartan/HCTZ and losartan alone significantly reduced SiDBP and SiSBP from baseline at the first measurement at 4 weeks (-10.1/-15.3 and -6.1/-6.9 mmHg, respectively; p<0.001) and at 8 weeks (-13.1/-18.5 and -8.7/-10.9 mmHg; p<0.001). The reductions with losartan/HCTZ were significantly greater than with losartan alone at weeks 4 and 8 (p<0.001). Both regimens were similarly well tolerated. In conclusion, initial therapy with losartan/HCTZ is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and produces a greater reduction in blood pressure than losartan alone. To test the antihypertensive and metabolic effects of lisinopril, 10 mg/d (L); hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 and 25 mg/d (H12.5 and H25); and its combination with lisinopril (L/H12.5 and L/H25) against placebo in patients with mild to moderate (stage I and stage II) hypertension.
                Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study of 12 weeks' duration.
                After 4 weeks of single-blind placebo treatment, 505 patients whose sitting diastolic blood pressure was 100 to 114 mm Hg were randomized into the study--467 patients completed it (placebo, 71; L, 80; H12.5, 79; H25, 77; L/H12.5, 79; and L/H25, 81). The patients were seen in the clinic every 2 weeks, where measurements of their sitting and upright blood pressure and heart rate were taken 24 +/- 2 hours after drug administration. Complete blood cell counts with differential cell counts, blood chemistry studies, urinalyses, and electrocardiograms were done at baseline and during the study. Roentgenograms were done once at baseline.
                Compared with placebo, all drug regimens decreased sitting and upright blood pressure (P < .001) and had no effect on sitting and upright heart rate. The greatest effect was obtained with the combinations of L/H12.5 and L/H25. There was no difference between L/H12.5 and L/H25 or between H12.5 and H25. There were no serious clinical side effects except cough, which was slightly higher with L, L/H12.5, and L/H25. The only metabolic side effects were in serum potassium level, which was lower with H25 (P < .01), and serum glucose level, which was higher with H25 and L/H25 (P < .01).
                The data suggest that (1) monotherapy of hypertension with L, H12.5, H25, L/H12.5, and L/H25 was effective and well tolerated; (2) the best results were achieved with L/H12.5 and L/H25; (3) lower doses of hydrochlorothiazide either alone or in combination with lisinopril were equipotent with higher doses and were free of metabolic side effects. This multicenter international trial recruited 205 patients from 16 investigators. After a 4-week, single-blind placebo run-in, patients were randomized to receive 16 weeks of trandolapril 2 mg/day (68 patients), hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg/day (68 patients), or the combination (69 patients). Morning predosing supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was the primary efficacy measurement. Intention-to-treat analysis showed significant decreases in all three groups in mean (+/- SEM) supine DBP throughout the study, with no significant differences at week 16 between trandolapril (-10.6 +/- 1.3 mm Hg) and HCTZ (-10.9 +/- 1.3 mm Hg). The combination gave a significantly greater reduction than either drug alone (-15.1 +/- 1.13 mm Hg). Blood pressure was normalized in the combination group in 67% of patients, a significantly higher proportion than either trandolapril (63%) or HCTZ (60%; p = 0.04). Each treatment was well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events was similar in all three groups. Trandolapril 2 mg once daily is an effective antihypertensive agent, comparable to HCTZ. Furthermore, the combination of the two drugs was shown to enhance the antihypertensive effect of the two compounds alone. This study compares the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of valsartan, a novel angiotensin II antagonist, given with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs placebo or vs valsartan or HCTZ alone.
                871 adult out-patients with essential hypertension participated in this double-blind study. Patients were randomised in equal number to receive either combination therapy of valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) and HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg), or valsartan (80 mg or 160 mg) or HCTZ (12.5 mg or 25 mg) alone, or placebo. Patients were treated once daily for 8 weeks and assessed at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after randomisation.
                The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) at end-point. The secondary variable was change in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP) from baseline to end-point.
                All active treatments produced a statistically significant difference in MSDBP (P < 0.001) from baseline to end-point compared with placebo. Similar results were obtained for MSSBP. All combination regimens produced a statistically significantly greater reduction in MSDPB and MSSBP than the corresponding monotherapies. Dizziness and headache were the most common treatment-related adverse experiences reported. Hypokalaemia, associated with the use of thiazide diuretics, was more commonly reported in the higher dose HCTZ 25 mg groups.
                Valsartan 80 mg and 160 mg act additively with HCTZ 12.5 mg or 25 mg to lower MSDBP and MSSBP in patients with essential hypertension. The addition of HCTZ to valsartan 80 mg or 160 mg was well tolerated. This prospective, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized patients with moderate hypertension (seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) 160-179 mm Hg when seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) <110 mm Hg; or SeDBP 100-109 mm Hg when SeSBP <180 mm Hg) 3:1:1 to treatment with irbesartan 300 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg combination therapy (n=328), irbesartan 300 mg monotherapy (n=106) or HCTZ monotherapy 25 mg (n=104). Treatment was initiated at half dose, with forced titration to full dose after two weeks followed by ten further weeks' treatment. The primary efficacy variable was the mean reduction in SeSBP from baseline to week 8. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, with mean baseline blood pressure approximately 162/98 mm Hg; the mean age was 55 years. At week 8 there was a reduction in SeSBP of 27.1 mm Hg with irbesartan/HCTZ, compared with 22.1 mm Hg with irbesartan monotherapy (P=0.0016) and 15.7 mm Hg with HCTZ (P<0.0001). Both the rate of decline and the total degree of decline achieved were greatest with irbesartan/HCTZ and least with HCTZ. A significantly greater percentage of patients reached a treatment goal of SeSBP <140 mm Hg and SeDBP <90 mm Hg by week 8 with irbesartan/HCTZ (53.4%), compared with irbesartan (40.6%; P=0.0254) and HCTZ (20.2%; P<0.0001) alone. Treatment was well tolerated in all three-treatment groups with a slight increase in adverse events in the combination therapy group. In conclusion, irbesartan/HCTZ (300/25 mg) is well tolerated and achieves rapid and sustained reductions in both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure in patients with moderate hypertension. The pharmacodynamic effects and acceptability of perindopril (4 mg daily) and hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg daily) given alone or in combination for 1 month were investigated in a double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study. The pharmacokinetics of perindopril and its active metabolite perindoprilat and the time course of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition were studied for 72 h following the last dose of treatment in the two appropriate groups. Similar decreases in blood pressure were seen 24 h after the last dose of perindopril or hydrochlorothiazide (11/7 mm Hg supine) given alone at these doses. The effect of these drugs given together was additive on diastolic blood pressure and synergistic on systolic blood pressure (24.5/12.6 mm Hg supine) taking into account the placebo response. The significant increase in plasma renin activity produced by perindopril alone was potentiated by concurrent administration of hydrochlorothiazide. The formation of perindoprilat was slightly reduced in the group also receiving hydrochlorothiazide and there was a very small reduction in ACE inhibition in this group. Perindopril, whether given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, was well tolerated and produced no clinically significant change in routine haematology or serum biochemistry. The additive or synergistic effects of perindopril and hydrochlorothiazide on blood pressure must be due to their complementary physiological actions and not to a pharmacokinetic interaction. To determine, in a multicenter study, whether the fixed combination of verapamil retard (240 mg) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) is capable of lowering blood pressure more effectively than either of the substances alone or placebo, while retaining good tolerability.
                A total of 173 patients who, after a four-week run-in period had a diastolic blood pressure of at least 100 and not more than 115 mm Hg, were randomized to six weeks of monotherapy with one of the two substances, placebo or the fixed combination.
                Combination treatment proved superior to monotherapy with either substance in lowering the diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.05). Also in terms of normalization (diastolic pressure < 90 mm Hg) the combination was clearly superior (p < 0.05). During the study no side effects beyond those associated with the single substances, occurred. In a double-blind, parallel-group multicentre study, the efficacy and safety of a fixed low-dose combination of ramipril 2.5 mg and hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 12.5 mg was compared with each of the component drugs when given as monotherapy. After a four-week placebo run-in, patients were randomized to receive either ramipril 2.5 mg (n = 218) or HCT 12.5 mg (n = 220), or the fixed-dose combination of ramipril 2.5 mg and HCT 12.5 mg (n = 222), for a period of eight weeks. At the end of the study, in which 624 patients had completed treatment, it was found that the decrease in supine diastolic blood pressure (the main efficacy parameter) was greater in the ramipril-HCT combination group than in either the ramipril or the HCT monotherapy groups, the difference being statistically significant when compared with the HCT group (-14.3, -13.1 and -12.4 mm Hg, respectively). Reductions in standing DBP and supine and standing systolic blood pressure (SBP) were also greatest in the combination group. The incidence of adverse events was lower in the combination group than in either of the monotherapy groups, and there were no serious clinically significant laboratory abnormalities in the combination group. To compare the efficacy of combination therapy with sustained-release diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide (DTZ SR-HCTZ) with that of monotherapy with DTZ SR, HCTZ, or placebo in the treatment of essential hypertension; and to determine whether the addition of a diuretic to diltiazem at apparent optimum doses of each agent significantly enhances their antihypertensive effects.
                Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial with a 6-week treatment phase.
                Private and university-based clinics.
                Subjects of either sex, ranging in age from 18-70 years, with a diagnosis of stable essential hypertension made from two consecutive weekly mean supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) readings of 95 mm Hg or above to 110 mm Hg or less that varied 7 mm Hg or less after 4-6 weeks in the baseline phase. Of the patients enrolled, 298 met the inclusion criteria.
                Combination therapy with DTZ SR-HCTZ 120 mg-12.5 mg, or monotherapy with DTZ SR 120 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg, or placebo was administered twice daily.
                Combination therapy with DTZ SR-HCTZ lowered both supine DBP and SBP significantly (p < 0.005) more than either single agent. The combination also lowered DBP and SBP significantly more than either monotherapy. During a 12-hour in-clinic monitoring period spanning a dosing interval, both the combination and DTZ SR therapies maintained efficacy, whereas the antihypertensive effects of HCTZ dissipated after 8 hours. Treatment-related adverse events for the combination and HCTZ were similar but slightly greater than those for DTZ SR and placebo.
                The addition of a diuretic to sustained-release diltiazem produced an enhanced antihypertensive effect compared with monotherapy with either individual agent. To compare the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a new combination preparation of diltiazem (150 mg) and hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg) with the individual constituents in patients with mild/moderate hypertension.
                Multi-centre, double-blind, randomised parallel group study.
                Seventy-one patients with essential hypertension were recruited to the study.
                Following completion of the placebo run-in period 63 patients fulfilled the prerandomisation criteria and entered the 10 week treatment period. Patients were randomised to receive either the combination preparation (D 150 mg/H 12.5 mg), diltiazem (150 mg) or hydrochlorthiazide (12.5 mg). The dosage was increased in three patients who had not attained target blood pressure (BP) control after 6 weeks.
                Response to treatment assessed by change from baseline in clinic and 24 h ambulatory BP.
                The proportion of patients achieving target BP (a reduction in resting supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) to below 90 mm Hg or a reduction of 10 mm Hg from baseline) was 80% in the combination group, 55% in the diltiazem group, and 38% in the hydrochlorothiazide group. The respective figures for reduction in supine DBP from baseline were 13.5 mm Hg, 11.2 mm Hg and 5.9 mm Hg. A similar treatment order appeared throughout each of the efficacy variables. BP control throughout the 24 h dosing interval was demonstrated by ambulatory BP monitoring. Each treatment was well tolerated.
                This study provides clear evidence of the efficacy of combination therapy with diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in the management of patients with hypertension. The efficacy and safety of enalapril and hydrochlorothiazide was investigated in a multicenter study of 81 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of three groups and, following a placebo period, given enalapril maleate (20 mg), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5 mg), or a combination of the two drugs (32.5 mg). A significant decrease in blood pressure was observed after only 2 weeks in the enalapril and enalapril-hydrochlorothiazide groups. A double dose was required to achieve a satisfactory response in one-third of the patients in both the enalapril (9 of 27) and the enalapril-hydrochlorothiazide groups (8 of 27). Adverse reactions included cough in one patient and mild hyperkalemia in another, both of whom received enalapril. Two patients on the drug combination developed side effects--symptomatic orthostatic hypotension in one and impotence in the second. Enalapril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide appears to be effective and well tolerated. Two hundred and eleven patients with mild or moderate hypertension, mean age 53.5 +/- 9.5 years (range 24-70) were randomised double-blind to treatment with either captopril 50 mg (C50), hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (HCTZ 25), the fixed combination of captopril 50 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg (C50/HCTZ 25) or placebo. Blood pressure, heart rate, body weight and side effects were assessed at the end of the run-in period on placebo and after 4, 6, 8 weeks treatment at the same time, 20-24 h after the last dosing. Routine biochemical examinations were carried out on all patients after the placebo period as well as after 4 and 8 weeks. Blood pressure significantly decreased in all groups, but the mean percentage change from baseline was highly statistically significant at 8 weeks, for C50 and C50/HCTZ 25 groups. The incidence of clinical side effects was low and not statistically different for the four groups with few specific adverse effects (one transient alteration of taste in captopril group). No patient was withdrawn from the study due to side effects. A better anti-hypertensive efficacy was obtained with the fixed combination captopril 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily compared to placebo or each component alone, and without any difference in side effects. The fixed combination of lisinopril 20 mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (L/HCTZ) was compared with each of the monocomponents in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study involving elderly patients with mild to severe hypertension. At the end of the trial, a total of 278 patients had completed 8 weeks of treatment. SBP reduction from baseline in the L/HCTZ group was significantly greater, sitting and standing, compared with both the monotherapy groups. Sitting DBP reduction from baseline in the L/HCTZ group was significantly greater than in the hydrochlorothiazide group. Uric acid levels were raised significantly more in the L/HCTZ group compared with the lisinopril group, and the fall in potassium levels were significantly smaller in the L/HCTZ group compared with the hydrochlorothiazide group. Safety and tolerability were equivalent for the three groups. The effects of nebivolol, a new beta-blocker with vasodilating properties, and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) as monotherapies and in combination on BP and plasma lipids, lipoproteins and apolipoproteins were compared with placebo in a parallel 3 x 4 factorial design study. After an eight week wash-out period, 240 patients with primary hypertension were randomised to receive either placebo, nebivolol 1, 5 or 10 mg, HCTZ 12.5 or 25 mg or one of the six possible combinations of nebivolol and HCTZ. Twenty patients were assigned to each of the 12 parallel groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, there was a significant dose-related reduction in BP among all active treatment groups. Apart from a slight and isolated increase in triglycerides with HCTZ 12.5 mg, lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein levels as well as lipoprotein and apolipoprotein ratios were not significantly modified by 12 week active treatments when compared with placebo treatment. The results of this multifactorial study with 12 small sample size groups, suggest that nebivolol as monotherapy and in combination with HCTZ does not cause deleterious effects on the lipid profile. In an 8-week, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter study with three parallel treatment groups, we compared the efficacy and safety of once-daily 20 mg quinapril plus 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) with each drug as monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Hypertensive out-patients with supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 105 and < or = 120 mm Hg at the end of a 2- to 4-week placebo-baseline period were randomly assigned to one of the treatment groups. Of the 323 patients who were randomized to double-blind medication, 297 completed the study, but 6 patients were excluded for violations of protocol; therefore, statistical analysis was performed in 291 patients. Only 7 patients withdrew owing to lack of efficacy (2 receiving combination therapy). In all three treatment groups, clinically significant reductions in DBP were achieved. Combination therapy was statistically more effective than each component in both evaluable data and intent-to-treat analyses. The incidence of adverse events (AE) was 24% in the quinapril monotherapy group, 14% in the combination therapy group, and 11% in the HCTZ monotherapy group. Orthostatic hypotension with related symptoms was observed in 4 patients (2 receiving quinapril monotherapy, 1 receiving HCTZ monotherapy, and 1 receiving combination therapy). Once-daily quinapril plus HCTZ provided increased reduction of DBP as compared with the monotherapies and was well tolerated in patients with moderate to severe hypertension. Aliskiren is a novel, orally active renin inhibitor. Its antihypertensive efficacy and safety, alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ), were investigated in an 8-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in hypertensive patients. The effects of these treatments on plasma renin activity (PRA) were also assessed.
                A total of 2776 patients aged >or=18 years with mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MSDBP) 95-109 mmHg were randomized to receive once-daily treatment with aliskiren (75, 150 or 300 mg), HCTZ (6.25, 12.5 or 25 mg), the combination of aliskiren and HCTZ, or placebo, in a factorial design. The primary endpoint was the change in MSDBP from baseline to week 8. PRA was assessed at these timepoints at selected study centers.
                Aliskiren monotherapy was superior to placebo (P < 0.001; overall Dunnett's test) in reducing MSDBP and mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MSSBP). Combination treatment was superior to both component monotherapies in reducing BP (maximum MSSBP/MSDBP reduction of 21.2/14.3 mmHg from baseline with aliskiren/HCTZ 300/25 mg), and resulted in more responders (patients with MSDBP < 90 mmHg and/or >or=10 mmHg reduction) and better control rates (patients achieving MSSBP/MSDBP < 140/90 mmHg) than either monotherapy. Aliskiren monotherapy reduced PRA by up to 65% from baseline. Although HCTZ monotherapy increased PRA by up to 72%, PRA decreased in all of the combination therapy groups. All active treatments were well tolerated.
                Aliskiren monotherapy demonstrated significant BP lowering, and its effect was considerably greater when combined with HCTZ. Renin inhibition with aliskiren neutralized the compensatory rise in PRA induced by HCTZ. nan The efficacy of cilazapril monotherapy and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was compared in a multicentre, double blind, randomised parallel group study in 87 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension over 8 weeks. After a 2 week single blind placebo run-in period, patients received either 2.5 mg cilazapril or 2.5 mg cilazapril plus 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide once daily. At Week 4 the cilazapril dose was increased from 2.5 mg to 5.0 mg if the mean sitting diastolic blood pressure was greater than 90 mmHg or had not decreased by more than 10 mmHg. After 8 weeks treatment 72% of patients responded to 2.5 mg cilazapril increasing to 88% with cilazapril 5.0 mg. For cilazapril plus hydrochlorothiazide, 83% responded to 2.5 mg cilazapril increasing to 96% on 5.0 mg cilazapril. The high response rate to low dose cilazapril monotherapy and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy has important implications for minimising the cost of therapy with ACE inhibitors. To assess the efficacy and safety of several combinations of benazepril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and hydrochlorothiazide, as compared with placebo, in the treatment of patients with essential hypertension.
                A 6-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel study conducted at 24 centers. A placebo run-in period of 1 to 4 weeks preceded the double-blind phase.
                Male and female outpatients, aged 18 years and older, were eligible to participate if their sitting diastolic blood pressure was between 95 and 114 mm Hg at the last two consecutive visits during the placebo phase. Among the 334 patients who entered the double-blind phase, 17% were aged 65 years or older and 26% were black. Eleven patients withdrew because of adverse experiences, including two patients receiving placebo.
                Patients received placebo; benazepril, 20 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg; or combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 5/6.25 mg, 10/12.5 mg, 20/25 mg, 20/6.25 mg, or 5/25 mg, once daily for 6 weeks.
                The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point (last postrandomization measurement carried forward) in the double-blind phase. Combination therapy with benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, was compared with benazepril, 20 mg alone, and hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg alone. Sitting systolic blood pressure and the effect of race and age on treatment efficacy were also evaluated.
                Compared with placebo, all benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide combinations produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressures at study end point. In the benazepril/hydrochlorothiazide, 20/25 mg, group, the adjusted mean changes in sitting diastolic blood pressure at end point were statistically significantly greater than those in the monotherapy treatment groups (benazepril, 20 mg, P < or = .05; hydrochlorothiazide, 25 mg, P < or = .001) alone. All therapies were generally well tolerated. Decreases in mean serum potassium level with hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy were reduced or eliminated with combination therapy.
                Benazepril in combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including a low-dose combination of 5/6.25 mg, is effective in reducing sitting diastolic and systolic blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
Thiazides when given as a second-line drug have a dose related effect to lower blood pressure that is similar to when they are added as a first-line drug. This means that the BP lowering effect of thiazides is additive. Loop diuretics appear to have a similar blood pressure lowering effect as thiazides at 1 times the recommended starting dose. Because of the short duration of the trials and lack of reporting of adverse events, this review does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of adverse effects of diuretics given as a second-line drug.