Safety and efficacy of vigabatrin and carbamazepine in newly diagnosed epilepsy: a multicentre randomised double-blind study. Vigabatrin European Monotherapy Study Group. Vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine monotherapy in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a randomized response conditional cross-over study. A comparative study of vigabatrin vs. carbamazepine in monotherapy of newly diagnosed partial seizures in children. Vigabatrin vs carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. A randomized, controlled study. Open comparative long-term study of vigabatrin vs carbamazepine in newly diagnosed partial seizures in children.
Vigabatrin is a newly licensed drug for use in patients with epilepsy. We investigated whether this drug was comparable to standard first-line monotherapy in efficacy and incidence of adverse events.
                We enrolled 459 patients with newly diagnosed, previously untreated partial epileptic seizures from 44 European centres and randomly assigned them carbamazepine 600 mg daily (n=230) or vigabatrin 2 g daily (n=229). After initial maintenance doses were reached, doses were adjusted downwards (in the case of adverse events) or upwards (in the case of seizures) by the clinician. The primary outcome was time to withdrawal because of lack of efficacy or adverse events. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to 6-month remission of seizures, time to first seizure after initial dose stabilisation), and adverse events (incidence and severity). Analysis was by intention to treat.
                Time to withdrawal for lack of efficacy or adverse events did not differ between groups (p=0.318). Vigabatrin was better tolerated than carbamazepine with fewer withdrawals, but was more frequently associated with psychiatric symptoms (58 [25%] vs 34 [15%]) and weight gain (25 [11%] vs 12 [5%]). Carbamazepine was associated with rash (22 [10%] vs seven [3%]). All efficacy outcomes favoured carbamazepine and failed to show equivalence between the two drugs. No significant difference was found for time to achieve 6 months of remission from seizures (p=0.058), but the most powerful outcome, time to first seizure after the first 6 weeks from randomisation, showed carbamazepine to be significantly more effective than vigabatrin (p=0.0001).
                Vigabatrin seems less effective but better tolerated than carbamazepine, which is the first-choice drug for the treatment of partial epilepsies. Vigabatrin cannot therefore be recommended as a first-line drug for monotherapy in this group of patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of vigabatrin (VGB) as add-on therapy for pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies is well established. However, for an objective evaluation, the effects of the drug in the monotherapy of newly diagnosed subjects should be determined. With this aim, VGB was compared, in a randomized, response conditional cross-over study, with carbamazepine (CBZ), the most widely prescribed drug in focal epilepsies. Fifty-one patients with complex partial (CP) seizures were randomly assigned to either the VGB or the CBZ group and evaluated after an initial 4 month period. The cross-over to the alternative drug was carried out, for an analogous period, only in cases with persisting seizures or in the presence of intolerable side effects. Patients who did not respond to either drug were subsequently treated with a combination of VGB and CBZ. No significant difference was revealed in the efficacies of VGB and CBZ; a complete control of seizures was obtained in 17/37 patients (45.9%) treated with VGB and in 20/39 patients (51.3%) treated with CBZ. The side effects were somewhat more frequent (41%) and severe with CBZ than with VGB (21.6%). The power to detect a 20% difference between the two drugs was 75%. The combination of the two drugs suppressed the seizures in 5 out of 14 resistant cases. The preliminary results in this small number of patients are encouraging and suggest that VGB may be considered as a first-line drug for epilepsy with CP seizures and as a valid alternative when other monotherapies are ineffective or poorly tolerated. Carbamazepine (CBZ) is a drug of choice for the treatment of simple or complex partial seizures and secondary generalized seizures in adults and children. Vigabatrin (VGB) is a relatively new second line antiepileptic drug and was first registered for use in Poland more than ten years ago. Few reports have been published on the comparison of efficacy of VGB in children with epilepsy. The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety, efficacy and EEG effects of initial VGB monotherapy compared with initial CBZ monotherapy in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We present results of a prospective, outpatient and open study carried out in the University Hospital Center in Białystok. Twenty-six children with partial epilepsy treated with VGB and 28 patients treated with CBZ were studied. The evaluation of the efficacy of the two drugs did not reveal any significant differences. Very good (reduction > 75%) seizure control was achieved in 22 out of 26 patients (84.6%) in the VGB group. One patient had a 50-75% decrease of seizures (good effect), similarly one child had a 25-50% reduction of seizures (mild effect). In two patients, we observed increased seizures (myoclonic jerks). Very good seizure control was achieved in 17 out of 28 patients (60.7%) in the CBZ group. Good seizure control was achieved in 5 out of 28 patients (17.8%) and mild control was seen in two children. No improvement was observed in 4 (14%) of the patients. The EEG background activity was improved in VGB-treated patients. No effect on the EEG background activity was observed in CBZ-treated children. VGB seems to be a safe and effective antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy in children with similar proportion of side effects as CBZ. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cognitive effects of initial vigabatrin monotherapy compared with initial carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy.
                Open, randomized, controlled design. Follow-up period of 12 months.
                University hospital with an epilepsy center.
                A total of 100 patients, aged 15 to 64 years, classified as suffering from partial seizures and/or generalized tonic-clonic seizures were randomized to either vigabatrin or carbamazepine monotherapy. Fifty-nine patients with a single epileptic seizure and no antiepileptic drug treatment served as a control population for objective safety measures.
                To evaluate the comparative efficacy and toxicity of vigabatrin and carbamazepine, the drug success rate (ie, the proportion of patients continuing successful treatment with the randomly assigned drug) after 12 months of steady-state treatment was used. To evaluate the safety of the drugs in addition to reported side effects, visual evoked potential recordings and neuropsychological evaluation were performed during follow-up.
                During the 12-month follow-up period, 60% of patients receiving vigabatrin and carbamazepine were treated successfully. Vigabatrin caused fewer side effects that required discontinuation of therapy. However, vigabatrin had to be discontinuated more often owing to lack of efficacy, and fewer of the successfully treated patients receiving vigabatrin achieved total freedom from seizures. Vigabatrin had no detrimental effects on cognitive functions. Retrieval from both episodic and semantic memory and flexibility of mental processing improved significantly in patients successfully treated with vigabatrin.
                Vigabatrin seems to be an effective and safe antiepileptic drug as primary monotherapy for epilepsy with fewer cognitive side effects than carbamazepine. To compare vigabatrin with carbamazepine as monotherapy in newly diagnosed children with partial epilepsy in order to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of both drugs.
                Open and randomized with a 2-year follow-up period.
                The Infantile Neuropsychiatric Division of the Regional Pediatric Hospital, Ancona, Italy.
                Seventy children with newly diagnosed partial epilepsy were treated with vigabatrin (38 patients) or carbamazepine (32 patients).
                Vigabatrin, 50 to 60 mg/kg per day, or carbamazepine, 15 to 20 mg/kg per day, split into twice-a-day doses.
                The efficacy and tolerability of vigabatrin were compared with those of the standard treatment (carbamazepine) for this patient group.
                The efficacy of vigabatrin and carbamazepine was similar, with the suggestion of a better side effect profile with vigabatrin.
                Vigabatrin monotherapy should be considered as a monotherapeutic treatment option in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. However, more studies are needed to evaluate other issues of concern, such as the cognitive and behavioral adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs, to determine the most suitable therapy.
There is currently insufficient data to address the risk-benefit balance of using VGB versus CBZ monotherapy for epilepsy. Considering the high prevalence of visual field defects, reported in an existing systematic review of observational studies (Maguire 2010), the prescribing of VGB monotherapy for epilepsy should be used with caution and not considered as a first-line choice. If necessary, a frequent assessment of visual field is needed. Future research should focus on investigating the reasons for visual field defects and exploring the potential prevention strategies. Moreover, future monotherapy studies of epilepsy should report results according to the recommendation of International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission, and methodological quality should be improved.