Dydrogesterone in threatened miscarriage: a Malaysian experience. Double-blind controlled trial of progesterone substitution in threatened abortion. Effects of vaginal progesterone on pain and uterine contractility in patients with threatened abortion before twelve weeks of pregnancy. Dydrogesterone support in threatened miscarriage.
Threatened miscarriage is a common problem during pregnancy.
                The aim of this prospective, open, randomised study was to determine whether dydrogesterone was more effective than conservative management alone in preventing miscarriage in women with vaginal bleeding up to week 16 of pregnancy. Women were excluded if they had a history of recurrent miscarriage. A total of 191 women were randomised to dydrogesterone (40 mg stat followed by 10mg twice daily) or conservative management (control group). The treatment was considered successful if the pregnancy continued beyond 20 weeks of gestation.
                The success rate in the dydrogesterone group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group (87.5% vs. 71.6%; p<0.05). Miscarriage occurred in 12.5% of women in the dydrogesterone group compared with 28.4% in the control group (p<0.05). There were no differences between the groups with regard to the incidence of Caesarean section, placenta praevia, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm labour (weeks 28-36), pregnancy-induced hypertension or low birth weight (<2500 g) babies. There were no intrauterine deaths or congenital abnormalities in either group.
                Compared with conservative management, dydrogesterone had beneficial effects on maintaining pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage.
                Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Between 1983 and 1984 a double-blind randomized study with progesterone substitution in threatened abortion was carried out. Fifty-six patients with vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy, the internal cervical os being closed, were referred to the hospital. Twenty-five women (5th and 6th week of gestation) with positive serum concentrations of beta-hCG were admitted to the study without regard to sonogram results. In other 25 women (7th-10th week of pregnancy) and 6 women (greater than or equal to 11th week of pregnancy) fetal heart action and movement could be demonstrated by ultrasound. The patients were prescribed bed rest and vaginal suppositories twice daily, containing either 25 mg progesterone or only polyethylene glycol. The code was not broken until after completion of the study. Serial serum determinations of beta-hCG, estradiol-17 beta (E2), progesterone, and ultrasound were performed. Four patients had to be omitted from final analysis (two tubal pregnancies, one intrauterine infection, one sectio parva). Three of 26 patients progesterone (11%) and five of 26 patients with placebo (19%) had an abortion, which represented no significant difference. Frequency of abortion was increased in women more than 30 years old, in women with previous abortions and after ovulation induction. Progesterone treatment resulted in a significant elevation of serum progesterone concentrations (p less than 0.01), while beta-hCG and E2 were unchanged. The results of this study confirm that pregnancy outcome is favorable in women with bleeding and normal hormone concentrations without hormonal treatment and unfavorable in women with reduced beta-hCG and E2-concentrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Fifty women with previous diagnosis of inadequate luteal phase and threatened abortion underwent a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in one medical center carried out with a parallel trial. The primary objective was to establish the effects of vaginal progesterone (Crinone 8%) in reducing both pain and uterine contractions (UCs). The gel with or without (placebo) vaginal progesterone was administered once a day since the diagnosis of threatened abortion and for 5 days. The efficacy on pain symptom amelioration was evaluated by a 5-score intensity gradation, while the UCs were evaluated by ultrasound. The secondary objective of the study was to evaluate the outcome of the pregnancies. The use of progesterone was effective both on pain relief and on the frequency of the UCs that decreased after 5 days of vaginal progesterone administration (P < 0.005). The evaluation of the ongoing pregnancy and spontaneous abortion in both study groups after 60 days showed that 4 patients of group A and 8 patients of group B miscarried (P < 0.05). In conclusion, patients with threatened abortion benefit from vaginal progesterone by a reduction of UCs and pain. The use of vaginal progesterone improved the outcome of pregnancies complicated by threatened abortion and previous diagnosis of inadequate luteal phase. The aim of this study was to determine whether dydrogesterone helps to preserve pregnancy in women with threatened miscarriage.
                146 women who presented with mild or moderate vaginal bleeding during the first trimester of pregnancy were randomised to receive oral dydrogesterone (10mg b.i.d.) (n=86) or no treatment (n=60). Dydrogesterone was continued until 1 week after the bleeding had stopped. All women received standard supportive care.
                The incidence of miscarriage was significantly lower in the dydrogesterone group than in the untreated group (17.5% vs. 25%; p<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to pregnancy complications or congenital abnormalities.
                Dydrogesterone appears to have beneficial effects in women with threatened miscarriage.
                Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
The data from this review suggest that the use of progestogens is effective in the treatment of threatened miscarriage with no evidence of increased rates of pregnancy-induced hypertension or antepartum haemorrhage as harmful effects to the mother, nor increased occurrence of congenital abnormalities on the newborn. However, the analysis was limited by the small number and the poor methodological quality of eligible studies (four studies) and the small number of the participants (421), which limit the power of the meta-analysis and hence of this conclusion.