Blood glucose, serum insulin, serum growth hormone and serum glycosylated proteins during two years' oral contraception with low-estrogen combinations. Menstrual reduction with extended use of combination oral contraceptive pills: randomized controlled trial. Effects of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or levonorgestrel on serum lipids and lipoproteins with particular regard to LDL size. A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and acceptability of Femodene and Microgynon-30. Ovarian activity suppression by two different low-dose triphasic oral contraceptives. Weight change and adverse event incidence with a low-dose oral contraceptive: two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. A comparative study of two contraceptive vaginal rings releasing norethindrone acetate and differing doses of ethinyl estradiol. Efficacy, cycle control, and safety of two triphasic oral contraceptives: Cyclessa (desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol) and ortho-Novum 7/7/7 (norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol): a randomized clinical trial. Efficacy and safety of a contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive: a 1-year randomized trial. Efficacy and acceptability of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or gestodene. A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given monthly by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. I. Contraceptive efficacy and sid effects. Multicenter trial of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and either desogestrel or gestodene in Thai women. Effect of norethisterone and levonorgestrel in low-dose multiphasic oral contraceptives on serum lipids. A placebo-controlled double-blind crossover investigation of the side effects attributed to oral contraceptives. A comparative study of the effects of the hemostatic system of two monophasic gestodene oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol. A randomized cross-over study on various hormonal parameters of two triphasic oral contraceptives. Comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives in a multicenter clinical study. A twelve-month comparative clinical investigation of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene, with respect to efficacy, cycle control, and tolerance. Open, multicenter comparison of efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day oral contraceptive regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 75 microg gestodene and a 21-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol and 150 microg desogestrel. Multicenter, comparative study of cycle control, efficacy and tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol/100 microg levonorgestrel and 20 microg ethinylestradiol/500 microg norethisterone. A comparison of the cycle control and tolerability of two ultra low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and either 150 micrograms desogestrel or 75 micrograms gestodene. Investigation of the influence of two low-dose monophasic oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene and 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/75 micrograms gestodene, on lipid metabolism in an open randomized trial. Effects of low-dose oral contraceptives on body weight: results of a randomized study of up to 13 cycles of use. Long-interval treatment regimen with a desogestrel-containing oral contraceptive. Effect of oral contraceptives on weight and body composition in young female runners. The development of elevated blood pressure while using oral contraceptives: a preliminary report of a prospective study. A study comparing a gestoden triphasic formulation with a fixed combination OC. Changes in androgens during treatment with four low-dose contraceptives. Effects on cycle control and bodyweight of the combined contraceptive ring, NuvaRing, versus an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg drospirenone. Extended use of transdermal norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol: a randomized trial. The influence of the dose of ethinylestradiol in oral contraceptives on follicle growth. Shorter pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives decreases follicular development. Comparison of the lipoprotein, carbohydrate, and hemostatic effects of phasic oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or levonorgestrel. Evaluation of body composition during low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives treatment. Effects of a new oral contraceptive containing an antimineralocorticoid progestogen, drospirenone, on the renin-aldosterone system, body weight, blood pressure, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism. Effect of an oral contraceptive containing drospirenone on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in healthy female volunteers. A double-blind comparison of two oral contraceptives containing 50 mu g. and 30 mu g. ethinyl estradiol. Effect of dienogest-containing oral contraceptives on lipid metabolism. A comparison of the cycle control, safety, and efficacy profile of a 21-day regimen of ethinylestradiol 20mug and drospirenone 3mg with a 21-day regimen of ethinylestradiol 20mug and desogestrel 150mug. Clinical comparison of two low-dose oral contraceptives, Minulet and Mercilon, in women over 30 years of age. A comparison between monophasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 150/30 and triphasic levonorgestrel-ethinyl estradiol 50-75-125/30-40-30 contraceptive pills for side effects and patient satisfaction: a study in Iran. Comparative clinical trial of two oral contraceptives with a low--estrogen content.
Body weight, fasting blood glucose (GP) (BFG), serum immunoreactive insulin (IRI), serum growth hormone (GH) and serum glycosylated proteins were longitudinally followed in 2 groups of women during two years' oral contraception. One group (n = 10) received a combination of 0.030 mg ethinylestradiol and 0.150 mg levonorgestrel and the other (n = 10) a combination of 0.030 mg ethinylestradiol and 0.150 mg of desogestrel. There was a significant increase in BFG during the study and the values were still rising, when examined 2 months after discontinuation of the pill. Two subjects, reaching the level of 5.5 mmol/l showed normal pretreatment values, when investigated one year later. After 6 months' use of either preparation, GH significantly increased, remained on that level throughout the study and returned to the pretreatment level after discontinuation of the pill. Body weight, IRI and GPP did not change significantly during the study. To compare a traditional 28-day cycle to an extended 49-day cycle of the 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (E2)/300 microg norgestrel monophasic birth control pill regimen.
                Ninety subjects randomized to either 28-day cycles with 21 active pills or 49-day cycles with 42 active pills for a prospective open label trial over four 84-day reference periods or trimesters. Bleeding, pill taking, and symptom diaries were completed. The sample size with 80% power to detect a 40% reduction in bleeding days required 24 subjects in each arm.
                Of the 90 women, 24 subjects (54.5%) on the 28-day cycle and 29 (63%) on the 49-day cycle completed the entire study (P =.41). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in demographics or continuation rates. There was a significant reduction in bleeding days in the experimental arm beginning in the first trimester (28-day = 10.9, 49-day = 6.4 mean days of bleeding, P <.001) and continuing to the fourth trimester (28-day = 11.3, 49-day = 5.8 mean days, P =.005). The number of spotting days was similar between both schedules in the first trimester (28-day = 4.8, 49-day = 3.7 mean days, P =.24) and continued into the fourth trimester (28-day = 3.4, 49-day = 2.9 mean days, P =.30). Annual expenditure for hygiene products was significantly less for extended use subjects (28-day = $41.45, 49-day = $17.54 spent, P <.001).
                Extension of the 28-day oral contraceptive (OC) cycle to a 49-day cycle resulted in fewer bleeding days and no increase in mean spotting days or bleeding episodes. This study was designed to determine the effects of two low-dose oral contraceptives, most frequently given in our area, monophasic desogestrel/ethinylestradiol (DG/EE) and triphasic levonorgestrel/ethinylestradiol (LNG/EE), on lipoprotein parameters, especially LDL particle size and HDL subclass distribution (determined by lipid-stained 2%-20% polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis) in 37 healthy normolipidemic women aged 19 to 27 years. Lipid and lipoprotein parameters were measured before the start of treatment and in the third month of oral contraceptive use. Results reflected the estrogen-progestin balance. As compared with baseline values, with both formulations, plasma total cholesterol, phospholipids, and HDL3 cholesterol increased, and LDL-predominant peak size decreased, with a translation of LDL pattern A towards pattern I. With DG/EE, plasma triglycerides, apolipoproteins AI and B increased. With LNG/EE, LDL cholesterol increased, and HDL2 cholesterol decreased. All these modifications were moderate, within threshold limits. Estrogen-dominant monophasic DG/EE appears to be more favorable than progestin-dominant triphasic LNG/EE, since the reduction in LDL-predominant peak size is not associated with an increase in LDL cholesterol or with a decrease in HDL2 cholesterol. The efficacy, cycle-control and tolerance of Microgynon-30, a widely prescribed levonorgestrel containing oral contraceptive, and Femodene, a new oral-contraceptive containing gestodene, were compared in a randomised, double-blind study involving 456 healthy women over a 6 month period. 229 women were allocated to receive Femodene and 227 received Microgynon-30. No differences between the groups in terms of obstetric and gynaecological history, previous contraceptive history, smoking habits, blood-pressure or body weight at admission were observed. No pregnancies were reported in either group, despite tablet-taking errors recorded in 6.3% of the Femodene group and 7.6% of the Microgynon-30 group. Both oral contraceptives were compared in terms of cycle length, intensity of the withdrawal bleed and side effects. Cycle-control was similar in the two groups. However, significantly fewer subjects reported breakthrough bleeding (with or without spotting) in the Femodene group (18% of patients) compared with the Microgynon-30 group (26% of patients). The incidence of absent withdrawal bleeds was 1% or less in both groups and no significant effects on body weight or blood pressure were observed. In an open, randomized study in an outpatient clinic of a large teaching hospital, thirty-one female volunteers with regular cycles and established ovulation by ultrasonography were given one of two triphasic oral contraceptives containing ethinylestradiol combined with levonorgestrel or desogestrel during six cycles of treatment. The main outcome measures were transvaginal ultrasonography and serum E2 and P measurements in pill cycles 1, 3 and 6. No ovarian activity was found in 10 subjects. Among the remaining 21 women who showed ovarian activity, most follicle-like structures developed in the pill-free week and decreased in size or disappeared in the first pill week. One women taking triphasic desogestrel had evidence of a luteinized unruptured follicle and one women taking triphasic levonorgestrel had a possible ovulation. The latter women also showed symptoms of lower abdominal pain. A statistically significant difference in ovarian activity between the two oral contraceptives could not be established. The two triphasic oral contraceptives suppressed ovarian activity to the same degree. A trend was seen towards increasing ovarian activity with duration of use in both treatment groups. Changes in body weight and the incidence of estrogen-related side effects with low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) have not been demonstrated in placebo-controlled trials. Two placebo-controlled, randomized trials demonstrated the efficacy of a low-dose OC for the treatment of acne in healthy females (n = 704; >or=14 years old) with regular menstrual cycles and moderate facial acne. Patients were randomized to receive 20 microg EE/100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) or placebo for six cycles. Body weight was measured at baseline and during Cycles 1, 3, and 6. The occurrence of adverse events was recorded at each visit. Mean changes in weight from baseline were similar with 20 microg EE/100 microg LNG [0.72 kg +/- 2.64 (SD; n = 349)] and placebo [0.56 kg +/- 2.64 (SD; n = 355; p > 0.05)] for the last measured weight of each patient. Rates of headache, nausea, weight gain, and breast pain, side effects commonly attributed to OCs, were also similar between groups (p > 0.05). No serious, unexpected, drug-related adverse events occurred during the study. The low-dose OC containing 20 microg EE/100 microg LNG is safe, well tolerated, and does not cause weight gain. Two combined contraceptive vaginal rings (CVR) each releasing approximately 1 mg norethindrone acetate (NET-Ac) and either 20 micrograms or 15 micrograms ethinyl estradiol over 24 h were tested at three clinic sites in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Sydney. A total of 61 women were enrolled to use the ring on a schedule of 3 weeks in/1 week out for four treatment cycles. Serum estradiol, progesterone, norethindrone (NET), and ethinyl estradiol (EE) levels were assayed twice weekly in all four treatment cycles. Both CVR performed well, with no pregnancies occurring and only one cycle of luteal activity suggestive of ovulation (serum progesterone > 32 nmol/L) occurring with each ring (0.9% of cycles with the 1/15 ring and 1.2% of cycles with the 1/20 ring). Although there was significantly more luteal activity in women using the 1/15 CVR (5.9% compared with 1.2% of cycles), only three cycles with a marked degree of luteal activity (progesterone > 10 nmol/L) occurred among compliant women. Serum levels of NET and EE were consistently elevated during use of both rings. There was no significant difference between serum levels with the two rings because of wide interindividual variations, although both NET and EE levels tended to be higher with the 1/20 ring. However, there was a significant difference in EE levels between the women in Los Angeles and Sydney using the same dose rings. Total cholesterol, HDL, and LDL cholesterol values were not significantly changed during treatment. Triglycerides increased but remained within the normal range. Overall cycle control was good with both formulations, but there was slightly more cycle disturbance with the lower dose ring. There was no change in mean body weight during the study, and individual weight changes appeared to be idiosyncratic. Side effects were infrequent and similar to those reported with other steroidal contraceptive methods. Three women complained of vaginal discharge, one with accompanying itch and one with a vaginal Candida infection in cycle 1. Overall, both of these EE/NET-Ac rings performed well, with only minor and mainly nonsignificant differences in effect on serum EE, NET, E2, and progesterone levels and lipids, and on vaginal bleeding patterns. The contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and safety of a new low-dose, triphasic desogestrel/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (CTR 77, Cyclessa(TM)) was compared to that of a marketed, triphasic norethindrone/ethinyl estradiol oral contraceptive (Ortho-Novum(R) 7/7/7). Two identical multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel group, comparative Phase III 6-cycle trials were designed to each enroll 4200 healthy women. The combined comparative data for Cyclessa versus Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 for both studies are reported here. Cyclessa and Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 had comparable contraceptive efficacy. Despite a lower ethinyl estradiol dose (25 microg/day vs. 35 microg/day), the Cyclessa group had significantly improved cycle control in comparison to the Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 group for presence of a withdrawal bleed (p = 0.001), lack of early withdrawal bleed (p = 0.01), and breakthrough bleeding/spotting (p = 0.001). For each of the months of the study, the incidence of breakthrough bleeding/spotting was lower in the Cyclessa group than the Ortho-Novum 7/7/7 group (breakthrough bleeding, p = 0.006; breakthrough spotting, p = 0.001). The incidence of other adverse events was similar among treatment groups, an observation that supports the safety of both formulations. There was significantly less weight gain (p = 0.0002) and less increase in the body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.0002) in the Cyclessa group. The contraceptive efficacy and safety of Cyclessa is comparable to Ortho-Novum 7/7/7. Cyclessa provides significantly improved cycle control with no weight gain. This open-label, randomized, Phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of and compliance with NuvaRing, a combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 microg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 microg of etonogestrel daily, with those of and with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 microg of levonorgestrel (LNG) and 30 microg of EE. Subjects received NuvaRing or a COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-/pill-free period). A total of 1030 subjects (NuvaRing, n=512; COC, n=518) was randomized and started treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for the NuvaRing group and 71.2% for the COC group. Five in-treatment pregnancies occurred in each group, giving Pearl indices of 1.23 for NuvaRing and 1.19 for the COC. Compliance with both treatments was excellent and both were well tolerated. In conclusion, NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability with a COC containing 150 microg of LNG and 30 microg of EE and does not require daily dosing. To assess the contraceptive efficacy, cycle control and acceptability of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing either 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 150 micrograms desogestrel or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms gestodene.
                In a randomized, open-label, six-cycle, group-comparative, multicenter study performed in Brazil, pregnancies, cycle-control parameters, incidence of side-effects and the presence and severity of acne vulgaris were assessed, and blood pressure and body weight were measured at pretreatment and after one, three and six cycles of oral contraceptive use.
                Of the 595 women enrolled, 274 (86.7%) in the desogestrel/ethinylestradiol group and 227 (81.4%) in the gestodene/ethinylestradiol group completed the six cycles, providing data for 1753 and 1487 treatment cycles, respectively. Two pregnancies occurred, one of which (in the desogestrel/ethinylestradiol group) was attributed to user failure, whilst the other (in the gestodene/ethinylestradiol group) was thought to result from method failure. Cycle control was observed to be excellent; the incidences of irregular bleeding and minor side-effects were low in both groups and decreased after an initial increase in the first cycle. Pre-existing acne improved in both groups, whereas blood pressure and body weight remained essentially unchanged.
                Both desogestrel/ethinylestradiol and gestodene/ethinylestradiol provide effective oral contraception with comparable cycle control and acceptability. A phase III clinical study was carried out among 5680 fertile Chinese women to evaluate efficacy and side effects of three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Chinese Injectable No. 1. When used in a once-a-month treatment schedule (part 1 of study), the effectiveness of Chinese Injectable No. 1 was unacceptably low; 36 pregnancies occurred during the first 1743 women-months of use, 16 before the second injection. The study was restarted with a revised injection schedule for Injectable No. 1: two injections separated by 9 +/- 1 days during the first month and subsequent injections given 10-12 days after the onset of bleeding, or if no bleeding occurred, 28 days after previous injection. In part 2 of the study, 988, 990 and 992 subjects were provided Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively. Life-table pregnancy rates at one year were 0.41%, 0% and 0.77% (p < 0.05), respectively; the overall discontinuation rates at one year were 13.9%, 19.1% and 20.4% (p < 0.001). Discontinuation rates for bleeding problems were significantly different between the groups: discontinuation rates for amenorrhea were 0.58%, 3.71% and 0.68% (p < 0.001) for Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1; for other bleeding problems, the rates were 4.88%, 8.38% and 12.64% (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding discontinuation for other medical or non-medical reasons. Mean weight changes after one year of use were small: 0.73, 0.86 and 0.17 kg for the three groups, respectively. Both Mesigyna and Cyclofem were very effective for contraception, but Mesigyna appeared to be tolerated slightly better with regard to cycle control; the modified dose regimen for Injectable No. 1 also gave a low pregnancy rate but was associated with higher rates of discontinuation. The efficacy and acceptability of two third generation oral contraceptives in Thai women were evaluated in a prospective, open, group-comparative, randomized, multicenter trial of women asking for contraception. In six Family Planning Centers and Outpatient Gynaecological Clinics in urban areas in Thailand, 783 healthy women who were at risk for pregnancy and did not have contraindications to oral contraceptive use were randomly allocated to one of the two study groups. An oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinylestradiol and 150 mcg desogestrel was given to 394 women and an oral contraceptive with the same amount of ethinylestradiol and 75 mcg gestodene to 389 women during 6 cycles. Criteria of cycle control, side effects and the presence and severity of acne vulgaris were assessed and blood pressure and body weight measured at pretreatment and after cycles 1, 3 and 6. Furthermore, the efficacy was evaluated after the last cycle. No pregnancies occurred with either of the contraceptives. The incidences of irregular bleeding and minor side effects in both groups were very low and decreased after an initial increase in the first cycle. Acne improved in both groups. Blood pressure and body weight remained unchanged. The two oral contraceptives were found to be effective and acceptable in Thai women. Compared to Caucasian women, the incidences of irregular bleeding and side effects were apparently lower in these Asian women. Furthermore, the effects of both oral contraceptives were comparable. In a parallel, multicenter study in Norway and Finland involving a total of 196 healthy women (mean age 22.4 years, range 18-30), the effects on serum lipids and lipoproteins of two multiphasic oral contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) but different progestins were examined. One formulation contained EE 35 micrograms and norethisterone (NET) 0.5 mg on days 1-7 and days 17-21 and elevated NET 1.0 mg during the midphase (days 8-16). The other formulation contained EE 30 micrograms on days 1-6 and days 12-21 and 40 micrograms on days 7-11 and phased levonorgestrel (LGN): 50 micrograms (days 1-6), 75 micrograms (days 7-11) and 125 micrograms (days 12-21). Both formulations induced significant elevation of total cholesterol (6.7 and 4.1%), Apo B (8.1 and 7.0%) as well as HDL (6.4 and 3.7%) for the EE/NET and EE/LGN formulation respectively. Mean serum levels of triglycerides were significantly elevated (58 and 47%). However, all mean serum lipid and lipoprotein values remained within the normal range, and no change in the calculated cholesterol ratio (HDL/total cholesterol) nor lipoprotein ratio (HDL/(HDL+LDL)) was observed. No significant difference between the formulations could be detected with respect to the effect on serum lipids and lipoproteins measured. The change in total cholesterol was smaller than reported in many studies of monophasic preparations. Taken together, these data suggest that only small alterations in lipid metabolism are elicited by these oral contraceptives. nan The effects of two oral contraceptives, containing gestodene and either 20 micrograms or 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol, on hemostatic parameters was investigated in a six-month randomized study involving a total of 40 healthy women between the ages of 18 and 30 years. A large number of hemostatic parameters were measured, which were categorized as either pro-coagulatory, anti-coagulatory, profibrinolytic, anti-fibrinolytic or indicative of fibrin turnover. Additionally, tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) were measured before and after venous occlusion and delta and ratio values calculated. Pro-coagulatory factors as well as reaction products reflecting in vivo coagulatory activity (thrombin-antithrombin III complex, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2) were found to increase. Among the anti-coagulatory parameters, only protein S concentration and protein S activity decreased, most notably in the 30 micrograms EE group. There was a corresponding increase in fibrinolytic activity reflected by reaction products of in vivo fibrinolysis (plasmin-antiplasmin 2-complex, fibrin-degradation products). Measurement of t-PA and PAI-1, before and after venous occlusion, revealed that the fibrinolytic response was more pronounced in the 20 micrograms EE group. There was also an increase in the threshold of fibrinolytic inhibition (ratio PAI-1) in both groups, which was less pronounced in the 20 micrograms EE group. Apart from isolated measurements, all parameters remained within their normal ranges and values returned to baseline in the follow-up cycle. It is concluded that both preparations had a balanced effect on the hemostatic system stimulating both pro-coagulant and fibrinolytic activity. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups; however, there was a trend towards greater fibrinolytic capacity in the 20 micrograms EE group. The effect of two triphasic oral contraceptives (Triquilar [TRQ] and Trisiston [TRS]) containing ethinyl estradiol (EE) and levonorgestrel (LNG) on various hormonal parameters was investigated in 26 women during a cross-over study. TRS consisted of 0.03 mg EE + 0.05 mg LNG (six tablets), 0.04 mg EE + 0.075 mg LNG (six tablets), and 0.03 mg EE + 0.15 mg LNG (nine tablets), whereas TRQ was different in the second phase (five tablets) and third phase (10 tablets). Blood samples were taken on days 6, 11, 21, and 28 of the control and washout cycles and the third treatment cycle. Both formulations inhibited ovulation reliably and decreased the serum levels of gonadotropins, free testosterone, and dehydroepiandosterone sulfate in a time-dependent manner, whereas estradiol and testosterone were already suppressed on day 6, indicating a direct suppressive effect on ovarian steroid synthesis. Prolactin, which rose sporadically in some women, was not significantly changed. In contrast, the levels of sex hormone binding globulin, corticosteroid binding globulin, and cortisol were significantly elevated by 100%. During the hormone-free interval of 7 days, all parameters returned at least partly to baseline. There was no significant difference between the effects of both formulations. The results suggest the possibility of a direct inhibitory effect of contraceptive steroids on ovarian steroid synthesis. This study compares the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol combined with either 75 micrograms of gestodene (EE/GSD) or 150 micrograms of desogestrel (EE/DSG). Women received the trial preparations daily for 21 days, followed by a 7-day pill-free interval. Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of 12 cycles. Efficacy data of 14,700 treatment cycles (EE/GSD: 7299; EE/DSG: 7401) were obtained from 1476 women (EE/GSD, n = 740; EE/DSG, n = 736). Both preparations provided effective contraception and good cycle control with a similarly low incidence of both spotting and breakthrough bleeding. The spotting rates in both treatment groups decreased from 35.1% (EE/GSD) and 37.5% (EE/DSG) in the first treatment cycle to approximately 10% in the fourth treatment cycle. The spotting incidence as percent of the total number of cycles was 12.7% for EE/GSD and 14.3% for EE/DSG. The breakthrough bleeding incidence was 5.2% of all cycles for EE/GSD and 6.0% of all cycles for EE/DSG. For 84.7% of the cycles in the gestodene group and for 82.5% of the cycles in the desogestrel group, neither spotting nor breakthrough bleeding were recorded. Overall, the spotting and breakthrough bleeding incidence tended to be lower with EE/GSD than with EE/DSG. However, the difference was not statistically significant. Amenorrhea was recorded in 2.7% of the cycles with EE/GSD and in 2.9% with EE/DSG. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar pattern of adverse events. More than 83% of the women in both groups either did not gain weight or lost more than 2 kg. Both preparations had a beneficial effect on dysmenorrhea. Both regimens provided reliable contraception and good cycle control. The incidence of adverse events was relatively low and both preparations were well tolerated. The aim of this study was to compare contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerance of an oral contraceptive containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE2) and 75 micrograms gestodene (GSD), with a reference preparation containing a similar dose of gestodene but in combination with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol. A higher incidence of intermenstrual bleeding was apparent under the 20 micrograms EE2 oral contraceptive. For the 20 micrograms EE2 preparation, 47.4% of all women reported spotting at least once over a period of 12 treatment cycles, whereas this figure was 35.5% for the 30 micrograms EE2 pill (p < 0.05). However, the incidence was within a range that corresponds to that of other OCs. The cumulative breakthrough bleeding rates (at least once during the one year of treatment) of 14.5% (20 micrograms EE2) and 11.8% (30 micrograms EE2) of women were not significantly different. In relation to all cycles, the intermenstrual bleeding rates were remarkably lower, indicating that the majority of the volunteers experienced such events only in few cycles under treatment: the spotting rate was 11.5% (20 micrograms EE2) and 7.2% (30 micrograms EE2) of all cycles, and the breakthrough bleeding rate was 2.6% and 1.6% of all cycles, respectively. Three pregnancies were recorded during the study (one in the 20 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD group, two in the 30 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD group). All three could be explained either by intake irregularities or by circumstances impairing the contraceptive effect. The influence of both treatments on the blood pressure and body weight proved to be extremely slight. Adverse events in both groups were rare and differences in the frequency of adverse events were not apparent. The discontinuation rate due to adverse events, including intermenstrual bleeding, was low (9.8% for 20 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD, and 7.2% for 30 micrograms EE2 + 75 micrograms GSD) and was in the lower range known for other oral contraceptives. Both preparations were well accepted by the volunteers. The data obtained demonstrate clinically acceptable cycle control, good tolerance, and a high standard of contraceptive reliability for both drugs. Prescription of the 20 micrograms EE2 preparation could be the first-line therapy in order to provide the lowest amount of EE2 possible. In case of persistent cycle control problems, a switch to the 30 micrograms EE2 drug should be considered. This prospective, open, randomized study was conducted to compare the contraceptive reliability, cycle control, and tolerability of a 23-day regimen with 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 75 microg gestodene (GSD) and a 21-day regimen with 20 microg EE and 150 microg desogestrel (DSG). Participants took either 23 tablets with active substances plus 5 placebo tablets (23-day EE/GSD) or 21 tablets with active substances followed by 7 days without pill-taking (21-day EE/DSG). Contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, and tolerability were evaluated over a period of seven cycles. Efficacy data gathered from 5967 treatment cycles (23-day EE/GSD: 2975 cycles; 21-day EE/DSG: 2992 cycles) were obtained from 890 participants (445 in each group). Both preparations proved to be effective contraceptives and provided good cycle control. No pregnancy during treatment was recorded. This resulted in a study Pearl Index of 0.0 for both treatments. For 23-day EE/GSD, 32.4% of participants reported at least one intracyclic bleeding episode during Cycles 2-4 (primary target) compared to 31.5% for 21-day EE/DSG. In the 23-day EE/GSD group, intracyclic bleeding episodes were reported by 48.8% of the participants in Cycle 1 but in only 15.1% in Cycle 7, and in the 21-day regimen group by 43.4% in Cycle 1 and only 14.2% in Cycle 7. Overall, intracyclic bleeding was reported in 20.9% of cycles for both treatments.A greater number of 23-day EE/GSD participants had shorter withdrawal bleeding periods than with 21-day EE/DSG. In significantly (p <0.0001) more cycles in the 23-day EE/GSD group participants reported withdrawal bleeding periods that lasted only 1-4 days compared to the 21-day EE/DSG group. For the majority of the treatment cycles, the median number of bleeding days in the 23-day EE/GSD group was 4 days and in the 21-day EE/DSG group 5 days. Both preparations were well tolerated and showed a similar adverse events pattern. The discontinuation rate because of adverse events was low (23-day EE/GSD: 6.1%; 21-day EE/DSG: 5.6%). No serious vascular adverse events were reported. More than 82% in the 23-day EE/GSD group and 79% in the 21-day EE/DSG group either lost more than 2 kg of weight or did not gain weight during the study. The treatment effect on blood pressure was negligible. There were no appreciable changes in mean laboratory values over the course of the study compared to baseline. A comparison of cycle control, efficacy and tolerability of two oral contraceptive preparations containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol combined with either 100 microg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG 20/100) or 500 microg norethisterone (EE/NET 20/500) was conducted. These results were compared to a standard reference preparation, containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol combined with 150 microg levonorgestrel (EE/LNG 30/150). Efficacy data from 8,544 treatment cycles were obtained from 767 women. Good cycle control and effective contraception was achieved with the two LNG preparations, however, the cycle control results were less favorable with EE/NET 20/500. The cumulative incidence of women with at least one episode of intermenstrual bleeding from cycles 2 to 7 (primary target variable) was 43.9% for EE/LNG 20/100, 72.7% for EE/NET 20/500, and 15.7% for the standard EE/LNG 30/150. The difference between the 2 20 microg of EE preparations, which favored EE/LNG 20/100, was statistically significant (p = 0.001). The overall spotting rates (cycles 1-13) were 9.3% for EE/LNG 20/100, 21.7% for EE/NET 20/500, and 3.3% for the standard EE/LNG 30/150. Amenorrhea was reported in 7.1% (EE/LNG 20/100), 20.6% (EE/NET 20/500), and 0.9% (standard EE/LNG 30/150), respectively. Intermenstrual bleeding episodes were shorter with EE/LNG 20/100 and EE/LNG 30/150 of the 13 treatment cycles. The study Pearl indices were 0.9 for EE/LNG 20/100, 1.9 for EE/NET 20/500, and 0.0 for EE/LNG 30/150. All three treatments were well tolerated. However, tolerability was somewhat less favorable with EE/NET 20/500. A total of 160 women prematurely discontinued the study for various reasons (EE/LNG 20/100: 7%; EE/NET 20/500: 18%; EE/LNG 30/150: 4%). The overall adverse event incidence rate during the trial was low in all groups. Blood pressure remained largely unaffected. Thirteen serious adverse events were recorded for all treatment groups, all but one were assessed as not related to the treatments. There were no remarkable treatment related differences in mean body weight throughout the study and the laboratory values were largely unaffected in all three treatments groups. To compare the cycle control and tolerability of two oral contraceptives containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and either 150 micrograms desogestrel or 75 micrograms gestodene.
                A randomized, multicenter study was conducted in which 1016 healthy adult women received the desogestrel (n = 509) or the gestodene (n = 507) preparation for six treatment cycles.
                No significant differences in bleeding patterns were detected between the two treatments. The incidence and duration of irregular bleeding decreased markedly, and to a similar extent, during each treatment. The occurrence of irregular bleeding per cycle decreased from 24.6 to 9.4% in the desogestrel group and from 19.7 to 8.6% in the gestodene group. Its duration fell from 1.1 to 0.2 days and from 0.9 to 0.3 days, respectively. There was a consistently low incidence of amenorrhea (1.0-2.8%). There were no significant differences between treatments for the incidence, intensity or emergence of dysmenorrhea. During both treatments, the incidence of premenstrual syndrome and complaints such as breast tenderness, nausea and headache dropped markedly.
                Ultra low-dose oral contraceptives containing desogestrel or gestodene offer equivalent, good cycle control and improvements in dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome and have similar, excellent tolerability profiles. An open comparison at a single center was performed in volunteers (n = 58) randomly allocated to two treatment groups, one receiving tablets containing 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol (EE) + 75 micrograms gestodene, and the other 30 micrograms EE + 75 micrograms gestodene. The study consisted of three treatment-free pre-cycles, followed by thirteen 28-day treatment cycles. Analysis of results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to the plasma levels of HDL-cholesterol and its subfractions, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoproteins. There was, however, a trend toward a more favorable effect on HDL-cholesterol in the 20 micrograms EE group, where levels increased by 3% compared with the 30 micrograms EE group, where levels decreased by 9%. There was a statistically significant difference between the adjusted mean values of total triglycerides in the two groups in favor of the 20 micrograms EE group (+21%), compared with the 30 micrograms EE group (+64%) (p = 0.029). Two serious adverse events were reported (lymphadenopathy and vertigo), but neither were considered to be causally related to either study medication. The formulation containing 75 micrograms gestodene and 20 micrograms EE was shown to be a reliable and well tolerated oral contraceptive, with a favorable lipid profile. To compare the effect of 2 oral contraceptives (OCs) on body weight.
                A randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study of 1,723 women taking an OC with norgestimate (NGM) 180/215/250 microg/ethinyl estradiol (EE) 25 microg vs. 1,171 women taking on OC with norethindrone acetate 1 mg/EE 20 microg for 6-13 cycles was performed. Body weight changes between baseline and cycle 6 and baseline and cycle 13 were analyzed. Analysis included not only changes in mean body weight but also the distribution of changes that were within 5% of baseline weight, 5-10% of baseline weight and > 10% of baseline weight. Only the 10% change was felt to be clinically significant.
                The distribution of body weight changes did not statistically differ between the 2 OC groups for any parameter measured. The mean weight change after 6 months for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/EE groups was +0.71 kg and +0.57 kg, respectively. At 13 cycles for the NGM/EE and norethindrone acetate/ EE groups, the mean body weight change was +0.93 kg and +0.62 kg, respectively. Only 0.3% of subjects in both OC groups experienced a 10% change in weight.
                Use of OCs does not substantially affect body weight for most women. A randomized multicenter study was performed in order to investigate the acceptance of a low-dose OC (30 micrograms of ethinyloestradiol and 150 micrograms of desogestrel), using a 9 weeks on and 1 week off schedule (prolonged regimen, n = 198), compared to a traditional 3 weeks on, 1 week off schedule (standard regimen, n = 96). Haemoglobin and blood pressure remained the same in both groups during the study. No significant differences were found in body weight changes between the two groups. There was significantly more breakthrough bleeding and spotting in the group with prolonged regimen than in the group with standard regimen, but both breakthrough bleeding and spotting decreased during the trial. Irregular bleeding was significantly less in women who were already using OC, compared to "new starters." No serious side effects occurred. Significantly more women stopped the trial because of bleeding problems in the group with prolonged regimen, while there were significantly more women who stopped the trial because of headache in the group with standard regimen. After completing 12 months, or after premature withdrawal from the study, each women completed a questionnaire. Sixty-three per cent of the women preferred the studied alternative and twenty-six per cent preferred the traditional OC. To examine the effect of oral contraceptives (OC) on body weight, fat mass, percent body fat, and lean mass in young female distance runners.
                The study population consisted of 150 female competitive distance runners aged 18-26 yr who had participated in a 2-yr randomized trial of the effect of the OC Lo/Ovral (30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 0.3 mg of norgestrel) on bone health. Weight and body composition were measured approximately yearly by balance beam scales and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, respectively.
                Women randomized to the OC group tended to gain slightly less weight (adjusted mean difference (AMD) = -0.54 +/- 0.31 kg.yr, P = 0.09) and less fat (AMD = -0.35 +/- 0.25 kg.yr, P = 0.16) than those randomized to the control group. OC assignment was associated with a significant gain in lean mass relative to controls among eumenorrheic women (those who had 10 or more menstrual cycles in the year before baseline; AMD = 0.77 +/- 0.17 kg.yr, P < 0.0001) but not among women with fewer than 10 menstrual cycles in that year (AMD = 0.02 +/- 0.35 kg.yr, P = 0.96). Treatment-received analyses yielded similar results.
                This randomized trial confirms previous findings that OC use does not cause weight or fat mass gain, at least among young female runners. Our finding that this OC is associated with lean mass gain in eumenorrheic runners, but not in those with irregular menses, warrants examination in other studies. nan Metabolic parameters were studied in 30 patients over 12 treatment cycles in a double-blind randomized comparative trial of the new progestogen gestoden in a triphasic formulation against a fixed dose combination pill containing desogrestrel, in Bandung, Indonesia. The results of this laboratory experience affirm findings in similar previous metabolic studies that: (1) the changes induced by modern low-dose pills are clinically and statistically insignificant; (2) throughout the treatment cycles, the values of the various laboratory tests remain well within the normal range; and (3) the favorable balance between coagulation and fibrinolysis is maintained. Results of lipoprotein, coagulation, fibrinolytic and liver function tests in 27 patients are presented. Gestoden's pharmacologic profile and the worldwide clinical experience with the triphasic gestoden formulation in 4285 women are discussed. The aim of the present study was to compare changes in the endogenous androgen environment in healthy women while on low-dose oral contraceptives (OCs). One-hundred healthy women were randomized to receive one of four OCs during six months: 21 tablets of Cilest, Femodeen, Marvelon, or Mercilon. During the luteal phase of the pretreatment cycle, body weight and blood pressure were recorded and the following parameters were measured: sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG), testosterone (T), free testosterone (FT), 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), androstenedione (A), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEA-S) and 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone (170HP) while also the free androgen index (FAI) was calculated. Measurements were repeated during the 3rd week of pill intake in the 4th and the 6th pill month. There were no differences on body mass and blood pressure with the use of the four OCs. The mean serum DHEA-S decreased significantly in all groups though less in the Mercilon group when compared to Cilest and Marvelon (approximately 20% vs 45%). Mean serum SHBG and CBG increased significantly in all four groups approximately 250% and 100%, respectively. In each group CBG also increased significantly but less in women taking Mercilon (-75%) as compared to the others (-100%). Current low-dose OCs were found to have similar impact on the endogenous androgen metabolism with significant decreases of serum testosterone, DHT, A, and DHEA-S. They may be equally beneficial in women with androgen related syndromes such as acne and hirsutism. The objective of this study was to compare cycle control, cycle-related characteristics and bodyweight effects of NuvaRing with those of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 microg of ethinyl estradiol and 3 mg of drospirenone.
                A randomized, multicentre, open-label trial in which 983 women were treated (intent-to-treat population) with NuvaRing or the COC for 13 cycles.
                Breakthrough bleeding or spotting during cycles 2-13 was in general less frequent with NuvaRing than that with the COC (4.7-10.4%) and showed a statistically significant odds ratio of 0.61 (95% confidence interval: 0.46, 0.80) with longitudinal analysis. Intended bleeding was significantly better for all cycles with NuvaRing (55.2-68.5%) than that with the COC (35.6-56.6%) (P < 0.01). Changes from baseline in mean bodyweight and body composition parameters were relatively small for both groups with no notable between-group differences.
                NuvaRing was associated with better cycle control than the COC, and there was no clinically relevant difference between the two groups in bodyweight. To compare bleeding profiles and satisfaction among women using a norelgestromin/ethinyl estradiol (E2) transdermal contraceptive patch in an extended regimen to those among women using a traditional 28-day patch regimen.
                Healthy, regularly menstruating women (N = 239) were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to receive the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch in an extended regimen (weekly application for 12 consecutive weeks, 1 patch-free week, and 3 more consecutive weekly applications, n = 158) or a cyclic regimen (4 consecutive cycles of 3 weekly applications and 1 patch-free week, n = 81). Subjects recorded bleeding data daily and completed satisfaction questionnaires. Subjects and investigators provided overall assessments of the regimens.
                Extended use of the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch resulted in fewer median bleeding days (6 compared with 14, P < .001), bleeding episodes (1 compared with 3, P < .001), and bleeding or spotting episodes (2 compared with 3, P < .001) compared with cyclic use during days 1-84; median numbers of bleeding or spotting days were similar between regimens (14 compared with 16, P = .407) during this time. Extended use delayed median time to first bleeding to 54 days compared with 25 days with cyclic (P < .001). Subjects were highly satisfied with both regimens. Although not statistically significant, slightly more adverse events were reported with the extended than with the 28-day regimen.
                Compared with cyclic use, extended use of the norelgestromin/ethinyl E2 transdermal patch delayed menses and resulted in fewer bleeding days. This regimen may represent a useful alternative for women who prefer fewer episodes of withdrawal bleeding. This prospective, randomized comparative clinical study involving 416 women investigated follicle development over a period of 12 oral contraceptive treatment cycles. Women were allocated to two groups, one group (n = 207) received a preparation containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 75 micrograms gestodene daily, and the other group (n = 209) received 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 150 micrograms desogestrel, daily. Follicular development was monitored by transvaginal ultrasonography of the ovaries, during days 18-21 in the pretreatment cycle and in treatment cycles 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. Follicular development was found to be twice as frequent in the group receiving 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol/desogestrel as in the group receiving 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/gestodene. For all cycles, follicles of 10-30 mm were found in 18% of women in the desogestrel group, compared with 9.7% in the gestodene group, whilst follicles with a diameter of >30 mm were present in 5% of the desogestrel group compared with 1.9% of the gestodene group. The difference between the treatment groups with respect to follicle diameters of 10-30 mm and >30 mm was statistically significant (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). No ruptured follicles were observed in either group throughout the study, suggesting that there was no escape ovulation, however, there was one pregnancy in the desogestrel group that could not be explained either by drug interactions or missed pills. It can be concluded that the ethinylestradiol dose in an oral contraceptive has a significant effect on follicular ovarian activity, and that reducing the dose to 20 micrograms is associated with a significant increase in follicle size. The objective of the study was to determine the suppressive effect on ovarian activity of 20 micrograms ethinylestradiol plus 75 micrograms gestodene administered for 21 or 23 days. The study was designed as a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial in 60 women. A pre-treatment cycle, three treatment cycles and a post-treatment period were monitored by ovarian ultrasound and by LH, FSH, 17 beta-estradiol and progesterone measurements every other day. No ovulation and no luteinized, unruptured follicle were observed. Suppression of ovarian activity was more pronounced by the 23-day regimen. 17 beta-Estradiol serum levels during the last six days of a cycle and during the first six days of the next cycle were significantly less (p < 0.05) in the 23-day regimen. The superiority of the 23-day regimen in comparison to the 21-day regimen with regard to the suppression of ovarian activity was shown in this study. The observed differences in the 17 beta-estradiol levels and follicular development between a 21-day and 23-day preparation combine to suggest that shortening the pill-free interval in combined oral contraceptives may increase the contraceptive safety margin in women on low-dose formulations. Desogestrel (DSG) is a less-androgenic progestogen than levonorgestrel (LNG). This difference in androgenicity may be responsible for observed differences in metabolic effects between oral contraceptive (OC) formulations containing almost equivalent estrogen doses but with either DSG or LNG as a progestogen. To test the hypothesis, a prospective 9-month randomized comparison of plasma lipids, glucose, insulin, hemostasis, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) was conducted in 66 healthy women using phasic formulations of OCs containing either DSG (DSG-OC) or LNG (LNG-OC). The study results showed that SHBG increased 3-fold with DSG-OC and 2-fold with LNG-OC. DSG-OC increased HDL-C, HDL(2)-C and HDL(3)-C; LDL-C decreased transiently. LNG-OC decreased HDL(2)-C and increased HDL(3)-C; HDL-C was unchanged and LDL-C decreased transiently. Both formulations increased VLDL-C and triglycerides, more with DSG-OC, but apolipoprotein B levels increased equally. Apo A-I and A-II increased more with DSG-OC than with LNG-OC. Neither formulation altered Lp(a) or fasting glucose and insulin levels. Postprandially, both formulations decreased glucose and increased insulin responses, but to an equivalent degree. Both OCs slightly enhanced procoagulant and profibrinolytic parameters to the same extent except for internally compensating decreases in Factor V and protein S with DSG-OC. In summary, at almost equivalent estrogen doses, a phasic OC containing DSG compared with LNG has a less androgenic effect on lipoproteins and SHBG, similar effects on hemostatic parameters with lower protein S and factor V activity and equivalent effects on carbohydrate metabolism. The lipoprotein, SHBG, and protein S and factor V differences are likely due to the lesser androgenicity of DSG allowing for a greater expression of the dose of estrogen. To determine in a prospective study if the use of two low-dose estrogen oral contraceptives is associated with changes in weight or body composition.
                80 outpatients referring to the family planning service, aged 18-43 years were randomly assigned to a treatment with the EE/desogestrel or EE/gestodene association, 20 patients with IUD, aged 26-40 years, were selected as a control group. Anthropometric data and body composition were taken at enrollment and after 6 and 12 months.
                Anthropometric measurements included body mass index (BMI), body composition estimated by mean of Bioelectrical Impendance Analysis (BIA).
                In the three groups weight, BMI, and total body water (TBW), and body cellular mass (BCM) remained unchanged during the study period.
                The use of EE/desogestrel and EE/gestodene is not associated with significant variations of body weight and body composition during one year treatment. Combined hormonal oral contraceptives (OCs) may lead to a mild rise in blood pressure and body weight. In rare instances, large increments in blood pressure are measured. We investigated the effect of a combination of ethinyl estradiol (EE) plus a progestogen with antimineralocorticoid, i.e. natriuretic, properties [Drospirenone (DRSP)] on body weight, blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone system, atrial natriuretic factor, plasma lipids, and glucose tolerance. It is anticipated that this will lead to the development of an OC that does not raise body weight or blood pressure. Four groups of 20 women each received 30 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group A), 20 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group B), 15 micrograms EE plus 3 mg DRSP (group C), and, as a control OC, 30 micrograms EE plus 150 micrograms levonorgestrel (Microgynon, Schering; group D) for 6 months. During the OC-free control cycles before and after treatment and throughout treatment, the target parameters were measured. Between the pretreatment cycle and the sixth treatment cycle, mean body weight fell by 0.8 to 1.7 kg in groups A, B, and C (P < 0.05 vs. D), whereas it rose by 0.7 kg in group D. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures fell by 1-4 mm Hg in groups A, B, and C (significant for A and C vs. D) and increased by 1-2 mm Hg in group D. Renin substrate rose equally in all groups (P < 0.05), whereas PRA and plasma aldosterone rose significantly only in the DRSP groups, presumably due to sodium loss. In the DRSP groups, high density lipoprotein cholesterol rose (P < 0.05), in contrast to group D. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol fell slightly (P > 0.05), whereas triglyceride levels showed a stronger increase in the DRSP groups (P < 0.05) than in group D. All groups attained good cycle control; group A had the best. Side-effects were minimal. To our knowledge, this is the first report on a combined OC that leads to a small decrease in body weight and blood pressure. It may be especially beneficial for women susceptible for a gain in weight and a rise in blood pressure. Drospirenone is a new synthetic progestogen with both progestational, antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic properties. In combination with ethinylestradiol, it is being developed as an oral contraceptive which will contain 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol and 3 mg drospirenone (Yasmin, Schering AG, Germany). The effects of drospirenone alone, and in combination with ethinylestradiol, upon the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) have been evaluated in healthy female volunteers. RAAS activity was assessed by measurement of plasma renin substrate (PRS) concentration (otherwise known as angiotensinogen), plasma renin activity (PRA), and plasma aldosterone (P-Aldo) concentration. An antimineralocorticoid effect was observed when volunteers received drospirenone alone at doses in the range 0.5-3.0 mg/day for one cycle. The effect was dose-dependent for P-Aldo but was not dose-dependent for PRA. When ethinylestradiol (30 micrograms) was combined with either 2 mg or 3 mg drospirenone and given to volunteers for three cycles, an increase in PRS was observed with both preparations, which was indicative of estrogenic stimulation, and increases in PRA and P-Aldo were shown which were indicative of an antimineralocorticoid effect of drospirenone. Increases in PRA and P-Aldo were significantly higher with the preparation containing 3 mg drospirenone in cycle 1 but not in cycle 3. The effect of the preparation containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone upon RAS activity was also compared with that of a commercially available preparation also containing 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol but combined with 150 micrograms desogestrel (Marvelon). Over a period of 13 cycles, increases in PRS were seen with both treatments, the effect being slightly more pronounced with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel. A markedly greater increase in PRA was seen following treatment with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone, and, in cycle 3, this difference was statistically significant. In contrast, P-Aldo was increased markedly with 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone in all measured cycles, whereas, in the 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/150 micrograms desogestrel group, changes were minimal. The increases in PRA and P-Aldo are interpreted as endogenous counter-regulation against the antimineralocorticoid activity of drospirenone. PRS increases under all combinations are an expression of estrogenic stimulation. Measurement of body weight and blood pressure in the studies with combined ethinylestradiol and drospirenone revealed that drospirenone was associated with either stable body weight or with a slight loss in body weight, while blood pressure remained largely unchanged. Overall, the results indicate that 30 micrograms ethinylestradiol/3 mg drospirenone has a distinct antimineralocorticoid effect. nan In a double-blind, controlled, randomized, four-arm, bicentric clinical study, the effect of four oral contraceptives (OCs) on lipid metabolism was investigated. Four groups composed of 25 volunteers each (mean age 26.1 +/- 4.5 years; body mass index 21.9 +/- 2.8 kg/m(2)) were treated for six cycles with monophasic combinations containing 21 tablets with either 30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) + 2 mg dienogest (DNG) (30 EE/DNG), 20 microg EE + 2 mg DNG (20 EE/DNG), 10 microg EE + 2 mg estradiol valerate (EV) + 2 mg DNG (EE/EV/DNG), or 20 microg EE + 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG; EE/LNG). The study was completed by 91 women. Blood samples were taken by venipuncture after at least 12 h fasting on Days 21-26 of the control cycle and Days 18-21 of the first, third, and sixth treatment cycle. There were clear differences between the effects of EE/LNG and the formulations containing estrogens and DNG. Although EE/LNG did not change the triglycerides levels, a significant increase was observed during treatment with the DNG-containing preparations. Although EE/LNG significantly reduced HDL-CH and HDL(2)-CH, there was a nonsignificant increase with the DNG-containing OCs. No change was observed in the levels of HDL(3)-CH. A significant rise in apolipoprotein A1 occurred during intake with the three DNG-containing formulations, but not with EE/LNG. In contrast to the women treated with combinations of estrogens and DNG, apolipoprotein B rose significantly in the women in the EE/LNG group. Lipoprotein (a) was significantly reduced by 30 EE/DNG and EE/LNG and remained unaltered with 20 EE/DNG and EE/EV/DNG. Altogether, the changes in lipid metabolism caused by the DNG-containing formulations appeared to be more favorable than those observed with EE/LNG. In OCs with DNG, the EE dose does not seem to play a major role with respect to the effect on lipids. To compare the cycle control, efficacy, and safety of a new low-dose combined oral contraceptive containing ethinylestradiol 20mug and drospirenone 3mg with an established formulation containing ethinylestradiol 20mug and desogestrel 150mug.
                This was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study of healthy women (aged 18-35 years) over seven treatment cycles. Both combined oral contraceptives were administered once daily for 21 consecutive days followed by a 7-day hormone-free interval.
                A total of 445 women were randomized to treatment; of these, 441 (ethinylestradiol 20mug/drospirenone 3mg, n = 220; ethinylestradiol 20mug/desogestrel 150mug, n = 221) went on to receive study medication. There was a trend towards reduced intracyclic bleeding with continued treatment in both treatment groups, consistent with clinical experience. Intracyclic bleeding was highest during the first treatment cycle in both treatment groups, but was generally much lower in subsequent cycles. More than 90% of women in each of the groups experienced withdrawal bleeding during the study. The duration of withdrawal bleeding remained fairly constant throughout the study. The maximum intensity was mainly bleeding, rather than spotting. Overall, cycle control, efficacy, and safety profiles were comparable between both groups. Adverse events were generally of mild-to-moderate intensity and were those typical of hormonal contraceptive use.
                In conclusion, both ethinylestradiol 20mug/drospirenone 3mg and ethinylestradiol 20mug/desogestrel 150mug are effective and well tolerated contraceptives that provide good cycle control. A comparative study of two low-dose oral contraceptives, gestodene (GES) 75 mcg/ethinyl oestradiol (EE) 30 mcg and desogestrel (DES) 150 mcg/EE 20 mcg, was conducted in women over 30 years of age. This randomised, open-label study was organised in Denmark, Italy, New Zealand and United Kingdom. A total of 505 women received GES/EE and 501 received DES/EE for 6 consecutive menstrual cycles. The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic and gynaecologic characteristics at baseline. However, the menstrual flow length was slightly longer in the GES/EE group before the start of the treatment. The mean age (+/- SD) was 35 +/- 4 years in the GES/EE group and 35 +/- 5 years in the DES/EE group. The subjects in the GES/EE group contributed data for a total of 2800 cycles and those in the DES/EE group, data for 2796 cycles. There were no pregnancies on medication with either preparation. The results showed that there were significantly more normal cycles in the GES/EE group for cycles 1 to 6. Irregular bleeding between withdrawal bleeds occurred in 10% of GES/EE and 18.5% of DES/EE cycles. Absence of all bleeding was reported in 29 (1%) and 63 (2%) cycles, respectively. The incidence of missed pills was low in both groups (11% of cycles). No significant differences were observed in cycle length or withdrawal bleeding episode length. Withdrawal bleeding mean intensity was statistically significantly greater with GES/EE. However, for both preparations, the mean intensity was close to light bleeding. No clinically significant differences were noted in weight, blood pressure, Papanicolaou smears or laboratory data. Sixty-eight (13.5%) subjects in the GES/EE group and 64 (12.8%) in the DES/EE group discontinued before the end of the study. Among them, 37 (7%) and 40 (8%) in the respective groups withdrew because of adverse reactions. There was no difference between groups in terms of primary reasons for withdrawal. The most frequently reported complaints that led to discontinuation in both groups were headache, nausea and metrorrhagia. Breast tenderness led to the discontinuation of 1 subject in the GES/EE group and 3 in the DES/EE group. These results show excellent cycle control, efficacy and very low rate of side effects with both GES/EE and DES/EE. These low-dose oral contraceptives could be well suited to healthy nonsmoking women requiring contraception up to the age of menopause. Oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) are one of the most effective reversible and accessible contraceptives, and patient acceptance for their use depends partly on the unfavorable adverse effects. The present study compared the two kinds of OCPs (monophasic; levonorgestrel (LNG)-ethinyl estradiol (EE) 150/30 versus triphasic; LNG-EE 50-75-125/30-40-30) for adverse effects and patient satisfaction.
                A randomized clinical trial was performed on 314 women who used OCPs for the first time, as their contraception, for 6 months. Overall, 1884 cycles were studied. In the monophasic group (n=159 who finally finished the study), monophasic pills LNG-EE 150/30mcg, and in the triphasic group (n=155 who finally finished the study), triphasic pills LNG-EE 50-75-125/30-40-30 mcg were used. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 10: Chi square test, Fisher exact test and Student's t-test were used.
                There were no significant differences between the two groups for common side effects, including nausea, headache, nervousness, facial hyperpigmentation (chloasma), and body weight (increase or decrease) but breakthrough bleeding and spotting (BTB/S) were less in the triphasic group, occurring in 30 cycles (18.86%) versus 10 cycles (6.45%), P=0.009*. Patient satisfaction for the two OCPs was similar and high. The rates of side effects were low.
                It seems that the monophasic and triphasic pills are similar according to patient satisfaction and side effects; therefore there is no benefit of one over the other except for BTB/S, for which triphasic is superior.
                Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. nan
Available evidence was insufficient to determine the effect of combination contraceptives on weight, but no large effect was evident. Trials to evaluate the link between combination contraceptives and weight change require a placebo or non-hormonal group to control for other factors, including changes in weight over time.