New approach to treatment of recent stroke. A randomized double-blind controlled trial of naftidrofuryl in acute stroke. Towards a model stroke trial. The single-centre naftidrofuryl study.
Ninety-one patients with acute stroke participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naftidrofuryl. Treatment was allocated at random and given over 12 weeks, neurological and neurophysical scores being obtained before treatment and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12. Both treatment groups greatly improved over the 12 weeks, but the naftidrofuryl-treated patients made greater neurological progress. Of the patients eventually discharged, those given naftidrofuryl spent only half as long in hospital as the controls. Deaths attributable to stroke were significantly fewer in the active-treatment group. There is evidence to support the use of naftidrofuryl in acute stroke with claims of increased recovery, reduced fatality and reduced bed occupancy in patients treated with either oral or intravenous preparations. One hundred patients presenting with acute hemisphere stroke (less than 72 hours) were randomized to receive either a new oral formulation of naftidrofuryl or placebo on a double-blind basis. Treatment was given for a total of 12 weeks and patients followed for 26 weeks with serial neurological and functional assessments by a single observer. Cumulative fatality and hospital-bed occupancy were determined at each assessment interval. No significant difference was demonstrated in cumulative fatality, hospital-bed occupancy or recovery of motor function in patients treated with either naftidrofuryl or placebo. There is no evidence from this study to support the use of oral naftidrofuryl in acute stroke. It has been questionable whether the lack of proven pharmacological treatments in acute cerebral infarction (ACI) reflects ineffective drugs or only inadequacies in their assessment. The difficulties in developing a rationale for drug therapy in this condition favoured the former, although the latter possibility was supported by re-evaluation of most published trials. In this paper, a plausible rationale, in terms of our current understanding of both the drug and the condition, is expounded for treatment of ACI with naftidrofuryl. Guidelines for the design and conduct of clinical trials in acute stroke are discussed in relation to the particular problems posed: need for early initiation of treatment; need for, and difficulties of, diagnostic confirmation; matching of treatment groups by prognostic indicators of uncertain significance, and requirements for large numbers of patients and long-term follow-up. The practical application of these guidelines is tested in a clinical trial of naftidrofuryl conducted in a single centre on 100 patients with proven diagnoses. Rigorous attention to all aspects of selection, treatment and follow-up, with an explanatory approach to the trial design, was predicted to produce a positive result if the drug was effective. The findings were that naftidrofuryl treatment was associated with no change in death rate but with clinically and statistically significant improvements in neurological recovery and bed-occupancy. Better functional recovery was also noted, so that the trial result was coherent. It was concluded that a beneficial effect had been recorded, and consistency of this outcome with those of previous studies is demonstrated. A case is made for further studies to define exactly the role of this drug in the management of ACI.
There is not enough evidence to support the use of naftidrofuryl in the treatment of acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke.