Addition of salmeterol to fluticasone propionate treatment in moderate-to-severe asthma. Efficacy and safety of high-dose budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) compared with budesonide administered either concomitantly with formoterol or alone in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. Tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salmeterol in adolescents with exercise-induced asthma using concurrent inhaled glucocorticoid treatment. Long-term circadian effects of salmeterol in asthmatic children treated with inhaled corticosteroids. A placebo-controlled, crossover comparison of salmeterol and salbutamol in patients with asthma. Comparison of the effects of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate with fluticasone propionate on airway physiology in adults with mild persistent asthma. Salmeterol xinafoate in asthmatic patients under consideration for maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy. UK Study Group. Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group. Salmeterol improves quality of life in patients with asthma requiring inhaled corticosteroids. Salmeterol Quality of Life Study Group. Low dose inhaled budesonide and formoterol in mild persistent asthma: the OPTIMA randomized trial. Effect of eight weeks of treatment with salmeterol on bronchoalveolar lavage inflammatory indices in asthmatics. Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma. Comparison between formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. and on-demand salbutamol in moderate persistent asthma. Pilgrim's progress: the effect of salmeterol in older children with chronic severe asthma. Asthma exacerbations in African Americans treated for 1 year with combination fluticasone propionate and salmeterol or fluticasone propionate alone. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a new powder inhalation device for the treatment of asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Adding salmeterol to an inhaled corticosteroid: long term effects on bronchial inflammation in asthma. Once-daily dosing with budesonide/formoterol compared with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol and once-daily budesonide in adults with mild to moderate asthma. The safety of twice-daily treatment with fluticasone propionate and salmeterol in pediatric patients with persistent asthma. Comparison of asthma treatment given in addition to inhaled corticosteroids on airway inflammation and responsiveness. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler versus inhaled corticosteroids alone in the treatment of asthma. A randomized, double-blind trial of the effect of anti-asthma treatment on lung function in children with asthma. Salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/500 microg) in combination in a Diskus inhaler (Seretide) is effective and safe in the treatment of steroid-dependent asthma. Salmeterol xinafoate in children on high dose inhaled steroids. Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial. Improved asthma control with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler, compared with budesonide alone. Early asthma control and maintenance with eformoterol following reduction of inhaled corticosteroid dose. Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. Addition of inhaled salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with poorly controlled nocturnal asthma. Effect of formoterol on clinical parameters and lung functions in patients with bronchial asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Efficacy and tolerability of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol administered twice daily via hydrofluoroalkane 134a metered-dose inhaler in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 12-week study. Effect of fluticasone/salmeterol administered via a single device on exercise-induced bronchospasm in patients with persistent asthma. Budesonide/formoterol improves lung function compared with budesonide alone in children with asthma. Once-daily budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler in adults with moderate persistent asthma. Effect of inhaled formoterol and budesonide on exacerbations of asthma. Formoterol and Corticosteroids Establishing Therapy (FACET) International Study Group.
This study was designed to determine whether the benefit of adding salmeterol was superior to doubling the dose of fluticasone propionate (FP) over 6 months, compared to a control group who remained on a lower dose of FP. The multi-centre, double-blind, parallel group study involved 496 symptomatic asthmatic patients with a history of exacerbations on 500-800 micrograms (microg) inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) twice daily (b.d.) in a broadly representative group of 100 hospitals and general practices in six countries. Two doses of FP--250 microg b.d. (FP250) or 500 microg b.d. (FP500)--were compared with the lower dose of FP plus a long-acting beta2-agonist, salmeterol 50 microg b.d. (SM/FP250). Patients symptomatic on the run-in dose of FP250 alone formed the control group in the treatment period. Over 6 months, SM/FP250 significantly improved mean morning peak expiratory flow rates (amPEF) by 42.1 l/min, more than twice the improvement achieved with either dose of FP alone. SM/FP250 also resulted in more symptom-free days and nights (P < 0.002) and days and nights with no relief medication (P < 0.001). The number of severe exacerbations was low: 3, 6 and 8% in the SM/FP250, low- and high-dose FP groups, respectively. This study confirms that adding salmeterol to low-dose inhaled FP offers greater improvements than either maintaining or doubling the dose of FP. Significant benefit was gained from adding salmeterol in a group of patients who appeared to have been at the top of their steroid dose-response curve receiving FP250. There was no evidence of tolerance and a low incidence of exacerbations in all treatment groups. Budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations bd, is an effective and well-tolerated maintenance therapy for patients not controlled on inhaled corticosteroids alone. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of a higher dose of budesonide/formoterol in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma.
                This was a 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy randomized study. Budesonide/formoterol 320/9 microg, two inhalations bd (1280/36 microg/day), was compared with corresponding doses of budesonide during weeks 1-12 and budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers during weeks 1-24. Efficacy was assessed during weeks 1-12; the primary variable was morning PEF. Safety was assessed over weeks 1-24.
                Patients (n=456; aged 12-79 years) had a mean reversibility in FEV1 of 28% and mean pre-study inhaled corticosteroid dose of 1038 microg/day. Mean morning PEF increased by 37 L/min and 36 L/min with budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol, respectively, versus an increase of 5 L/min with budesonide (P<0.001 for both vs. budesonide). Budesonide/formoterol increased time to first mild exacerbation (P<0.005) versus budesonide. Budesonide/formoterol and budesonide plus formoterol had similar efficacy. All treatments were well tolerated and the incidence of class-related adverse events was similarly low in all groups. Changes in serum potassium and plasma cortisol were comparable across treatments.
                High-dose budesonide/formoterol (320/9 microg, two inhalations bd) is effective and well tolerated in patients with persistent symptomatic asthma. The findings also support the safety of regular high-dose formoterol (36 microg/day). The long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist salmeterol prevents exercise-induced asthma, but tolerance may develop to its bronchoprotective effect. We wanted to ascertain if the development of tolerance could be prevented by using a low-dose treatment regimen of 50 microg once daily, instead of the usual dose of 50 microg twice daily, in adolescents receiving regular glucocorticoid inhalations. Methods. In a randomized, double-blind, 2x28-day crossover study, we administered salmeterol (50 microg) or placebo once daily via a metered-dose inhaler and Nebulizer Chronolog device to monitor compliance. Exercise challenge tests were performed 1 and 9 hours after salmeterol or placebo inhalation on the 1st and 28th day of each treatment period. The primary outcome variable was the maximum decrease in percent predicted FEV1 postexercise.
                Fourteen subjects with a mean age of 13.1 years completed the study. The first dose of salmeterol had an excellent bronchoprotective effect against exercise-induced asthma at 1 and 9 hours. After the 28th consecutive daily dose of salmeterol, the bronchoprotective effect was significantly greater than that of placebo at 1 hour, but not at 9 hours.
                We conclude that a single 50-microg dose of salmeterol has an excellent protective effect against exercise-induced asthma for at least 9 hours, but that this effect may wane during regular once-daily salmeterol treatment, despite the reduced frequency of dosing and despite concomitant use of inhaled glucocorticoids. The present study was set up to investigate whether salmeterol in children with asthma already treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) leads to a sustained bronchodilator effect and decreased bronchial responsiveness, both during the day and night. Furthermore, we investigated whether cessation of salmeterol leads to a rebound increase in bronchial responsiveness. Forty children with asthma (aged 7-15 yrs) using ICS participated in a randomized, double-blind, parallel study. They received either twice daily 50 micrograms salmeterol or placebo. FEV1 and provocative concentration of methacholine that caused a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) were measured at 4:00 P.M. and 4:00 A.M. at baseline and after 16 wk. The same measurements were performed at 4:00 P.M. at 8 h after the first dose, and after 1 and 8 wk. After cessation of the study drug, FEV1 and PC20 were measured at 12 and 20 h and after 1 wk. Overall mean FEV1 from 1 to 16 wk of treatment was significantly higher in the salmeterol group than in the placebo group (difference, 4.9 +/- 2.0%, p = 0.01). Evolution in time of FEV1 did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.09). Overall mean PC20 from 1 to 16 wk of treatment was not significantly higher with salmeterol than with placebo (difference, 0.7 +/- 0.4 doubling dose [DD] p = 0.07); evolution in time of PC20 did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.58).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) We compared the effects of salmeterol (Sm) (50 micrograms twice daily) with that of salbutamol (Sb) (200 micrograms four times daily) and placebo (P) in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma with asthma symptoms and related the effectiveness of these therapies between patients who used concurrent inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and those who did not. The study was a 12-wk, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with 367 adult asthmatics randomized to each trial medication for 4 wk. Inhaled Sb was provided as rescue medication to all patients throughout the trial. Only 80% of patients, albeit the majority, were receiving maintenance treatment with ICS throughout this trial; this reflects practice current in early 1990. Each study day, patients recorded their morning and evening peak expiratory flows (PEF), assessment of asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication. Both morning and evening PEF were greater during treatment with Sm than with Sb (mean differences between the treatments of 29.8 and 14.3 L/min, respectively) or P (27.7 and 20.3 L/min, respectively) (p < 0.0001). Sm was also more effective than Sb or P in lowering diurnal variation in PEF and increasing the percentage of symptom-free days and rescue-free days and nights with no sleep disturbance (p < or = 0.0004). Sb was more effective than P in increasing evening PEF and the percentage of symptom-free days (p < 0.05) and rescue-free days (p < 0.0001). The same clinical superiority of Sm compared with Sb and P was observed in those patients using ICS (p < 0.001 for all treatment comparisons), and to a greater extent than in those patients not using ICS (i.e., Sm was more effective than Sb and P in just six of the 20 treatment comparisons; p < 0.05). In conclusion, Sm 50 micrograms twice daily is effective in the management of mild-to-moderate asthma and it further improves asthma control in patients already using ICS. This study compared the effect of inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) with the combination of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) on lung function parameters in patients with mild asthma.
                Adult patients with mild persistent asthma (> or = 80% predicted FEV1) receiving 200-500 mug of BDP or equivalent were randomised to receive either FP 100 mug or SFC 50/100 mug twice daily from a Diskus inhaler for four weeks. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in airway resistance (sRaw) at 12 hrs post dose measured by whole body plethysmography. Impulse oscillometry and spirometry were also performed.
                A comparison of the geometric mean sRaw at 12 hrs post dose in the SFC group to the FP group gave a ratio of 0.76 (0.66 - 0.89, p < 0.001) at week 2 and 0.81 (0.71 - 0.94, p = 0.006) at week 4. Similarly, significant results in favour of SFC for oscillometry measurements of resistance and reactance were observed. FEV1 was also significantly superior at week 2 in the SFC group (mean difference 0.16L, 95% CI; 0.03 - 0.28, p = 0.015), but not at week 4 (mean difference 0.17L, 95% CI -0.01 - 0.34, p = 0.060).
                SFC is superior to FP in reducing airway resistance in mild asthmatics with near normal FEV1 values. This study provides evidence that changes in pulmonary function in patients with mild asthma are detected more sensitively by plethysmography compared to spirometry
                NCT00370591. In severe chronic asthma, long-term oral steroids may be necessary to control symptoms. In patients in whom such treatment was under consideration, the efficacy and safety of salmeterol xinafoate 100 micrograms b.i.d. was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group, multicentre study. One hundred and nineteen chronic symptomatic asthmatics were randomized to receive either salmeterol, 100 micrograms b.i.d. (n = 55; baseline % predicted morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 59%; forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 66%) or placebo (n = 64; baseline % predicted morning PEF 63%; FEV1 66%) both via the Diskhaler. Morning and evening PEF and asthma symptoms were recorded in daily record booklets by the patient over a 12 week period. A significant improvement in morning PEF was achieved after 1 month in the salmeterol treated group; this persisted throughout the treatment period (estimated treatment difference 22 L.min-1). There was a significant increase in the proportion of symptom-free nights experienced by the salmeterol treated group (33 (SD 32) %) compared with placebo (13 (26) %), and a significant decrease in daily use of relief medication (mean decrease 5.1 (4.7) doses per day with salmeterol, 2.5 (4.0) doses with placebo). Both treatments were well-tolerated, with no evidence of any difference in the side-effects associated with beta 2-agonists. In conclusion, the addition of salmeterol (100 micrograms daily) to the existing treatment of chronic asthmatics under consideration for maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy is well-tolerated, improves lung function and provides additional symptom control. Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens.
                The objective of this study was to compare the effect of twice daily formoterol (Foradil), 4 times daily albuterol, and on-demand albuterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), lung function measurements, symptoms, and other indicators of disease control over 6 months inpatients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We also looked for occurrence of rebound BHR on discontinuation of treatment.
                This was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial. Methacholine PC20 was the primary outcome variable. Other outcome variables included symptom scores, use of rescue medication, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), serial FEV1 measurements, and asthma exacerbations.
                Of the 271 randomized patients, 217 completed the study. Formoterol was significantly superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to methacholine PC20, FEV1, PEF, symptom scores, and use of rescue medication at each measured time point/interval. Regular albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to PC20 and FEV1, but not PEF or various clinical scores. After a small drop in the magnitude of bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation occurring shortly after randomization, there was no evidence of progressive tolerance to either regular treatment for any of the measured variables or of rebound increase in BHR 2 days after the end of treatment. The formoterol group had the lowest number of exacerbation days, as defined by high intake of rescue bronchodilator and/or symptom scores, whereas the number of exacerbations requiring increased corticosteroid coverage was similar in the 3 groups.
                In patients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving inhaled corticosteroids, formoterol taken twice daily resulted in superior bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control compared with on-demand albuterol over 6 months. Four times daily albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol for only some of the end points. Progressive tolerance and a rebound increase in BHR on discontinuation of beta-agonists were not found Traditional clinical outcomes have demonstrated that salmeterol improves pulmonary function and reduces asthma symptoms. However, they do not evaluate how patients perceive the effect of therapeutic intervention on day-to-day functioning and well-being.
                We sought to evaluate the impact of salmeterol on disease-specific quality of life with the Asthma Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, as well as the efficacy and safety of salmeterol in patients with stable asthma who were symptomatic despite daily use of inhaled corticosteroids.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 506 patients. Patients were treated with 42 microg salmeterol or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks delivered through a metered dose inhaler.
                Mean change from baseline in asthma quality-of-life scores was significantly greater (p < or = 0.006) after 12 weeks of treatment with salmeterol compared with placebo ("as-needed" albuterol) in global scores (1.08 vs 0.61) and individual domains (activity limitations, 0.91 vs 0.54; asthma symptoms, 1.28 vs 0.71; emotional function, 1.17 vs 0.65; and environmental exposure, 0.84 vs 0.47). Patients treated with salmeterol experienced significantly greater improvements from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo in FEV1 (0.42 L vs 0.15 L, p < 0.001), morning peak expiratory flow (47 L/min vs 14 L/min, p < 0.001), evening peak expiratory flow (29 L/min vs 11 L/min, p < 0.001), and asthma symptom scores (daytime scores reduced by 0.55 vs 0.30, p < 0.001). Patients treated with salmeterol used significantly less supplemental albuterol (reduced by 3 puffs/day vs 1 puff/day, p < 0.001).
                Salmeterol provided significantly greater improvement in quality-of-life outcomes in patients whose asthma symptoms are not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids. These results demonstrate that the benefits of salmeterol are not limited to conventional clinical measures of efficacy. The optimal treatment for mild asthma is uncertain. We assessed the effects of adding a long-acting inhaled beta-agonist, formoterol, to low doses of an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, for 1 yr in subjects with mild asthma, receiving no or only a small dose of inhaled corticosteroid. The 698 corticosteroid free patients (Group A) were assigned to twice daily treatment with 100 microg budesonide, 100 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol, or placebo. The 1,272 corticosteroid-treated patients (Group B) were assigned to twice daily treatment with 100 microg budesonide, 100 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol, 200 microg budesonide, or 200 microg budesonide plus 4.5 microg formoterol. The main outcome variables were time to the first severe asthma exacerbation and poorly controlled asthma days. In Group A, budesonide alone reduced the risk for severe exacerbations by 60% and poorly controlled days by 48%; adding formoterol increased lung function with no change in other end points. By contrast, in Group B, adding formoterol reduced the risk for the first severe exacerbation and for poorly controlled days by 43 and 30%, respectively. Thus, in corticosteroid-free patients, low dose inhaled budesonide alone reduced severe exacerbations and improved asthma control, and in patients already receiving inhaled corticosteroid, adding formoterol was more effective than doubling the corticosteroid dose. Using BAL, we studied the effects of 8 wk of treatment with salmeterol on airway inflammation in nine asthmatic subjects in a double-blind crossover placebo-controlled protocol. The study patients were all receiving regular inhaled corticosteroid therapy (400 to 1,000 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate per day) and inhaled albuterol for symptomatic relief, i.e., subjects who might be considered suitable for treatment with salmeterol. The asthmatic group had significant differences in numbers of epithelial cells and eosinophils in BAL compared with a group of 15 normal control subjects (p < 0.01). During salmeterol treatment mean morning and evening peak flow rates were increased (p < 0.05). There was no significant change in BAL cell profile and no change in percentages of CD4 and CD8 lymphocytes or proportion of lymphocytes expressing HLA-DR after salmeterol. In conclusion, we were unable to demonstrate any significant anti-inflammatory effect of regular salmeterol therapy on airway inflammation using BAL in these asthmatic patients. At the same time, there was equally no evidence of a deterioration in the underlying inflammatory disease process. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.
                Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Inhalation of on-demand salbutamol (ODS) several times daily is sometimes the only beta2-agonist prescribed in moderate persistent asthma, whereas a long-acting beta2-agonist should be added. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of formoterol dry-powder capsule 12 microg b.i.d. (Foradil) and ODS in patients with moderate persistent asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids, in the conditions of real practice. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were randomized (formoterol; 130; ODS: 129) in this open, parallel-group trial. The mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF primary variable) and evening PEF over the 3-month treatment period were statistically significantly higher with formoterol: +25.7 and +24.1 l min(-1), respectively vs. +4.5 and +0.5 l min(-1) respectively with ODS. The increase in FEV1 was statistically significantly higher with formoterol at months 1 and 3. Formoterol reduced the use of salbutamol as rescue medication by two-thirds. The percentages of symptom-free days and nights statistically significantly increased with formoterol (+20% and +33% respectively), but did not significantly change with ODS. Clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement in the mean total score of the St George's Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire was observed in the formoterol group. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. The results show that treatment with formoterol has significant advantages over ODS in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Twenty-four children aged 12-17 years entered a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study investigating the use of salmeterol in chronic severe asthma. In addition to their usual medication, the children were given either placebo or 100 micrograms salmeterol b.d. by dry powder inhalation. Treatment was continued throughout one term at a residential school for asthma. Symptom scores, peak expiratory flow rates, spirometry and quality-of-life scores were compared between the two treatment groups. One child withdrew during the run-in period. Twelve pupils received placebo and 11 pupils received salmeterol. There were consistent improvements in favour of salmeterol, reaching statistical significance for morning and evening peak flow rates and spirometry when measured on four occasions during the study period. There were no medication-related adverse events recorded and no pulse rate changes. Salmeterol (100 micrograms b.d.) is well tolerated and efficacious in older children with chronic severe asthma. This long-term prospective study was conducted in African Americans with persistent asthma to examine the safety and effectiveness of the combination of the inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), and the long-acting beta-agonist, salmeterol, compared with FP alone.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center trial in adolescent and adult subjects >/=12 years of age symptomatic on a low dose of an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). The study consisted of a 2-week screening period on low dose ICS; a 4-week open-label FP 250 mcg twice daily (BID) run-in; a 52-week double-blind period (FP/salmeterol [FSC] 100/50 mcg [n=239] or FP 100 mcg [n=236] BID), and a 4-week FP 250 mcg BID run-out period. Annualized exacerbation rate was the primary outcome for comparing the two treatments. Other measures of asthma control included peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, and albuterol use. Safety was assessed through adverse events.
                Exacerbation rates were not significantly different in those treated with FSC 100/50 mcg (0.449 per year) compared with FP 100 mcg (0.529 per year, p=0.169). When the per-protocol analysis was applied, the rates were 0.465 and 0.769 per year for FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg, respectively. Treatment with FSC 100/50 mcg provided statistically greater improvements in lung function measures and nighttime awakenings (p</=0.050) and demonstrated numerically lower daily symptoms (p=0.216) and albuterol use (p=0.122). Two subjects treated with FSC 100/50 mcg were hospitalized for an asthma exacerbation compared to three treated with FP 100 mcg. The overall incidence of adverse effects during double-blind treatment was similar between the FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg treatment groups (61% and 68%, respectively). Frequent study visits were required of subjects during this long-term study, and it remains unknown whether this intervention may affect generalizability.
                In this large, prospective study among African Americans with asthma, the addition of salmeterol to FP resulted in a similar low rate of exacerbations and improved other markers of asthma control. Both FSC 100/50 mcg and FP 100 mcg were well-tolerated, and the overall safety-profiles were similar over 1 year of treatment. Many patients with persistent asthma need both long-acting bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids for optimal asthma control.
                Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (in a combination dry powder product) with that of placebo, fluticasone, or salmeterol alone.
                A 12-week randomized, double-blind, multicenter study was conducted in 356 patients aged 12 years or older with asthma. After a 14-day screening period, patients were randomized to treatment with salmeterol 50 microg combined with fluticasone 100 microg (combination product), salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone 100 microg, or placebo administered in the Diskus dry powder inhaler (GlaxoWellcome, UK) twice daily.
                Mean change in FEV(1) at end point was significantly (P < or =.003) greater with the combination product (0.51 L) compared with placebo (0.01 L), salmeterol (0.11 L), and fluticasone (0.28 L). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.013) area under the curve compared with placebo and fluticasone on day 1 and compared with placebo, salmeterol, and fluticasone at week 1 and week 12. Patients in the combination product group were less likely to withdraw from the study because of worsening asthma compared with those in the other groups (P < or =.020). The combination product significantly increased (P < or =.012) morning PEF (combination, 52.5 L/min; placebo, -23.7 L/min; salmeterol, -1.7 L/min; fluticasone, 17.3 L/min) and evening PEF at end point compared with the other groups. The combination product significantly (P < or =.025) reduced symptom scores and albuterol use compared with the other treatments and increased the percentage of nights with no awakenings and the percentage of days with no symptoms compared with placebo and salmeterol. All treatments were equally well tolerated.
                Salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone 100 microg combined in the Diskus powder delivery device offers significant clinical advantages over salmeterol or fluticasone alone at the same doses. Addition of the long acting beta2 agonist salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids leads to better symptomatic asthma control than increasing the dose of inhaled corticosteroids. However, little is known about the long term effects of adding salmeterol on the asthmatic inflammatory process, control of which is considered important for the long term outcome of asthma.
                After a 4 week fluticasone run-in period, 54 patients with allergic asthma were randomised to receive twice daily treatment with fluticasone 250 microg with or without salmeterol 50 microg for 1 year in a double blind, parallel group design (total daily dose of fluticasone 500 microg in both treatment groups). Primary outcomes were sputum eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein concentrations. Secondary outcomes were neutrophil associated sputum parameters and a respiratory membrane permeability marker. The effects on allergen induced changes were determined before and at the end of the treatment period.
                Adding salmeterol to fluticasone resulted in improved peak expiratory flow, symptom scores, rescue medication usage, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (p < 0.05 for all). There was no sustained effect on sputum cell differential counts and cytokine concentrations during the treatment period or on changes induced by allergen challenge at the end of treatment (p > 0.05). However, adding salmeterol significantly reduced sputum ratios of alpha2-macroglobulin and albumin during the treatment period (p = 0.001).
                The addition of salmeterol to fluticasone produces no sustained effect on allergen induced cellular bronchial inflammation but leads to a significant improvement in size selectivity of plasma protein permeation across the respiratory membrane. This may contribute to the improved clinical outcome seen in patients with allergic asthma when a long acting beta2 agonist is combined with inhaled corticosteroids. Adherence to maintenance therapy is often poor in patients with asthma. Simplifying dosing regimens has the potential to improve both adherence and asthma-related morbidity. In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study, 617 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma (mean forced expiratory volume in 1s [FEV1] 78.5% predicted) who were not optimally controlled on inhaled corticosteroids (200-500 microg/day) were randomized to once-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 2 inhalations in the evening), twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, 1 inhalation), or a corresponding dose of budesonide once-daily (200 microg, 1 inhalation in the evening). All patients received budesonide (100 microg twice daily) during a 2-week run-in. Changes in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) were similar for od budesonide/formoterol (23.4 l/min) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (24.1 l/min), and both were greater than with budesonide (5.5 l/min; both P<0.001). Evening PEF, symptom-free days, reliever-free days, and asthma control days were improved with budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P<0.05 vs. budesonide for all variables). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol administered once daily in the evening is a convenient treatment regimen that is as effective in improving asthma control as twice-daily dosing in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. For children older than 5 years with asthma who remain symptomatic despite inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy, the preferred treatment is to add an inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist vs increasing the ICS dose.
                To compare the safety of twice-daily treatment with inhaled fluticasone propionate plus the inhaled long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol with that of fluticasone propionate used alone in children aged 4 to 11 years with persistent asthma.
                A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study in 203 children with persistent asthma who were symptomatic during ICS therapy. Patients received fluticasone propionate-salmeterol (100/50 microg) or fluticasone propionate (100 microg) alone twice daily for 12 weeks.
                The safety profile of fluticasone propionate-salmeterol was similar to that of fluticasone propionate alone. The overall incidence of adverse events was 59% for fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 57% for fluticasone propionate. Both treatments were well tolerated. Two patients receiving fluticasone propionate-salmeterol and 5 receiving fluticasone propionate withdrew from the study because of worsening asthma. Changes in heart rate, blood pressure, and laboratory variables were infrequent and were similar between treatments. No patients had clinically significant abnormal electrocardiographic findings during treatment. Geometric mean 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment was comparable within and between groups; no patient in either group had abnormally low 24-hour urinary cortisol excretion after 12 weeks of treatment. The incidence of withdrawals due to asthma exacerbations was 2% in the fluticasone propionate-salmeterol group and 5% in the fluticasone propionate group.
                In pediatric patients with persistent asthma, fluticasone propionate-salmeterol twice daily was well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to that of fluticasone propionate used alone. There is increasing evidence that the assessment of eosinophilic airway inflammation using induced sputum and measurement of airway hyperresponsiveness provides additional, clinically important information concerning asthma control. The aim of this study was to directly compare the effects of different treatments on these markers in patients with asthma and persistent symptoms, despite the use of low-dose inhaled corticosteroids. A double-blind four-way crossover study was performed, which compared a 1-month treatment with budesonide 400 mug b.i.d., additional formoterol, additional montelukast and placebo in 49 patients with uncontrolled asthma despite budesonide 100 mug b.i.d., with each treatment separated by a 4-week washout period. The change in sputum eosinophil count with formoterol (2.4 to 3.8% change, 0.6-fold reduction, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5-0.9) differed significantly from placebo (2.8 to 2.5% change, 1.1-fold reduction, 95% CI 0.7-1.6) and high-dose budesonide (2.7 to 1.6% change, 1.6-fold reduction, 95% CI 1.2-2.2). The effects of montelukast did not differ from placebo. The changes in methacholine airway responsiveness were small and did not differ between treatments. High-dose budesonide had the broadest range of beneficial effects on other outcomes, including symptom scores, morning peak expiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in one second. In conclusion, treatment given in addition to low-dose inhaled corticosteroids results in modest benefits. Formoterol and high-dose budesonide have contrasting effects on eosinophilic airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy (expressed as effect on lung function) and tolerability of Symbicort (budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler) in children with asthma. This was a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial. After a 2-4-week run-in period, 286 asthmatic children (177 boys, 109 girls; mean age, 11 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), 75% predicted normal), previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids (average dose 548 microg/day), were randomized to 12 weeks' treatment with either budesonide/formoterol 80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 148), or an equivalent dose of budesonide 100 microg, two inhalations twice daily (n = 138). Efficacy variables included morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF), spirometery, asthma symptoms, and use of rescue medication (beta(2)-agonists). Serial FEV(1) assessments were carried out on a subgroup of children (budesonide/formoterol, n = 41; budesonide, n = 40) at randomization and at week 12. Relative to baseline, morning PEF (primary variable) increased to a significantly greater extent with budesonide/formoterol than with budesonide alone (7.22% predicted normal vs 3.45% predicted normal; P < 0.001). Evening PEF also increased significantly with budesonide/formoterol (6.13% predicted normal vs. 2.73% predicted normal; P < 0.001), as did mean FEV(1) and serial FEV(1) measured over 12 hr (both P < 0.05). Similar improvements in asthma symptoms and rescue medication use were observed in both groups. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of their adverse-event profile and rates of discontinuation. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler provided rapid improvements in PEF and FEV(1) compared to inhaled budesonide alone. These improvements were sustained throughout the study period. Budesonide/formoterol was well-tolerated in children with moderate persistent asthma.
                Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and especially spirometry measures are useful tools in evaluating early response to treatment of asthma in children mainly due to their worldwide availability. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of anti-asthma treatment in children, equally on FEV(1), FEF25-75%, R(int) and SR(aw) values.
                Children 6-18 years of age with moderate atopic asthma were randomized to 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive 200 microg budesonide (B) (n=29), 5 or 10 mg (according to age) montelukast (M) (n=29), 200 microg B + 5 or 10 mg M (n=29), 200 microg B + 9 microg formoterol (F) (n=29) or placebo (n=27). FEV(1,) FEF25-75%, R(int), SR(aw) were measured before and after treatment.
                R(int), SR(aw), FEV(1) improved significantly in all active treatment groups while FEF25-75% improved significantly only in BM group and M group. Combination therapy, showed significantly greater effects on R(int) than monotherapy: BM group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.03) and BF group compared to B group (P=0.01) and M group (P=0.04).
                This study shows that using single parameter for monitoring asthma can be misleading. Using combination of lung function techniques provides better assessment of treatment. Results of our study confirm this hypothesis. The best effect on large and small airways was achieved with combined anti-inflammatory therapy. This multicentre double-blind, double-dummy study compared the safety and efficacy of a new combination Diskus inhaler containing both salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 500 microg (Seretide, GlaxoWellcome, France) with the same doses of the two drugs delivered via separate Diskus inhalers and with the same dose of fluticasone propionate alone. Patients were eligible for study entry if they had received an inhaled corticosteroid continuously for 12 weeks prior to run-in, and had received treatment with beclomethasone dipropionate or budesonide 1500-2000 microg day(-1) or fluticasone propionate 750-1000 microg day(-1) for at least 4 weeks prior to run-in. In total, 503 patients receiving inhaled corticosteroids were randomized to 28 weeks' treatment with either salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (50/500 microg) via a single Diskus inhaler (combination) and placebo, or salmeterol 50 microg and fluticasone propionate 500 microg administered via separate Diskus inhalers (concurrent), or fluticasone propionate 500 microg and placebo. All treatments were administered twice daily, mean morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and asthma symptoms were measured for the first 12 weeks and safety data were collected throughout the 28-week study. Over weeks 1 to 12, improvement in adjusted mean morning PEFR was 35 and 33 l min(-1), respectively, in the combination and concurrent therapy treatment groups (12 and 10% increase from baseline, respectively). The mean difference between treatments was -3 l min(-1) (90% confidence interval -10.4 l min(-1)) which was within the criteria for clinical equivalence. However, the combination therapy was statistically significantly superior to fluticasone propionate alone for mean morning PEFR (P<0.001) and other measures of lung function, whilst clinical equivalence of the combination and concurrent therapies was observed. All three treatments were well tolerated. In addition, there were no differences between the three treatments in either the c.hange in serum cortisol or urinary cortisol concentrations, which, for each treatment group, were no significantly different from baseline at the end of the treatment period. Thus, the combination of salmeterol and fluticasone propionate in a single inhaler is as well tolerated and effective in achieving asthma control in steroid-dependent patients as the separate administration of the two drugs, and both combination and concurrent therapy are superior to administration of the same dose of corticosteroid alone. Current UK and international guidelines on asthma management recommend that, in pediatric patients still symptomatic on treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids, consideration should be given to the introduction of regular twice daily long-acting beta 2-agonists.
                The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of inhaled salmeterol xinafoate 50 micrograms bid via the Diskhaler when added to the existing treatment of children with moderate to severe asthma.
                A 12-week multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted at 78 hospital centers throughout the United Kingdom, involving 210 asthmatic children aged between 4 and 16 years of age. Morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), evening PEF, night-time and daytime symptoms and relief medication usage were recorded daily by the patient or parent over a 12-week treatment period.
                Compared with placebo, the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to existing high dose inhaled corticosteroid treatment significantly improved mean morning PEF expressed as percent predicted (PEF-PP) during the first 4 weeks of treatment (median increase 6.5 percentage points P < .001). This effect persisted throughout the 12-week treatment period (P < .05). Both groups demonstrated an overall improvement in mean morning PEF-PP, 7.5 percentage points for salmeterol xinafoate and 4 percentage points for placebo. The mean evening PEF-PP followed a similar although less pronounced trend which was significant only during the first 4 weeks of treatment (P = .014). Daytime relief medication and recorded symptoms were reduced significantly in both groups. There was a greater improvement in the number of symptom-free days during the first 4 weeks (P < .01) and the last 4 weeks (P < .05) of treatment for salmeterol xinafoate. The overall incidence and nature of minor adverse events was similar in both groups.
                This study demonstrates that the addition of salmeterol xinafoate to inhaled corticosteroid therapy in symptomatic asthmatic children significantly improves morning PEF-PP, and reduces their symptoms and use of relief medication. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the preferred maintenance therapy for adults and children with mild, moderate and severe persistent asthma, with the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to ICS therapy recommended for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. The efficacy and safety of the combination of budesonide and formoterol delivered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) is well documented.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI; Symbicort pMDI, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) with budesonide pMDI (Pulmicort pMDI, Astra [corrected] Zeneca, Lund, Sweden), formoterol DPI (Oxis Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), budesonide plus formoterol in separate inhalers (budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI) and placebo.
                This was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study.
                This multicentre study was conducted in the respiratory specialty clinical practice setting.
                The study included 596 patients > or =12 years of age with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving ICSs.
                After 2 weeks on budesonide pMDI 80 microg x two inhalations (160 microg) twice daily, patients received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160 microg/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320 microg/9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg) + formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo twice daily.
                There were two prespecified primary efficacy variables: mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), obtained approximately 12 hours after the most recent administration of study medication at home and immediately before the next administration of study medication at the clinic; and mean change from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1), assessed as the average change in FEV(1) from serial spirometry over the 12-hour period after administration of the morning dose of study medication at the clinic.
                Mean changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end of treatment were greater (p < or = 0.049) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.19L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.10L), formoterol DPI (-0.12L) and placebo (-0.17L). Mean changes from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1) were greater (p < or = 0.001) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI after 1 day (0.37L), 2 weeks (0.34L) and at end of treatment (0.37L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.11, 0.15 and 0.15L) and placebo (0.09, -0.03 and -0.03L), and after 2 weeks and at end of treatment versus formoterol DPI (0.19 and 0.17L). Fewer (p < or = 0.025) patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus monoproducts or placebo met worsening asthma criteria. Results were similar in the budesonide/formoterol pMDI group and the budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI group on all measures. All treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles.
                In this population, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI provides asthma control significantly greater than the monocomponents or placebo and comparable with budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI. Safety profiles were similar for all treatments. Budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler was compared with budesonide alone, and with concurrent administration of budesonide and formoterol from separate inhalers, in patients with asthma, not controlled with inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone. In this 12-week, double-blind, randomized, double-dummy study, 362 adult asthmatics (forced expiratory volume in one second 73.8% of predicted, inhaled glucocorticosteroid dose 960 microg x day(-1)) received single inhaler budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort Turbuhaler) 160/4.5 microg, two inhalations b.i.d., or corresponding treatment with budesonide, or budesonide plus formoterol via separate inhalers. There was a greater increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) with single-inhaler (35.7 L x min(-1)) and separate-inhaler (32.0 L x min(-1)) budesonide and formoterol, compared with budesonide alone (0.2 L x min(-1); p<0.001, both comparisons); the effect was apparent after 1 day (p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons). Similarly, evening PEF, use of rescue medication, total asthma symptom scores and percentage of symptom-free days improved more with both single inhaler and separate inhaler therapy than with budesonide alone, as did asthma control days (approximately 15% more, p<0.001 versus budesonide, both comparisons, with a marked increase in the first week). All treatments were well tolerated and the adverse event profile was similar in all three treatment groups. It is concluded that single inhaler therapy with budesonide and formoterol is a clinically effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with asthma that is not fully controlled by inhaled glucocorticosteroids alone. Previous studies have indicated the benefits of adding long acting beta(2) agonists to inhaled corticosteroids in the maintenance treatment of moderate to severe asthma. The effects of adding eformoterol to corticosteroids on asthma control and exacerbations in patients with mild to moderate asthma were studied.
                After a run in period of 7-14 days on existing medication, 663 symptomatic patients were randomised to receive budesonide Turbohaler 400 microg twice daily together with either eformoterol Turbohaler 9 micro g (delivered dose) or placebo twice daily. After 4 weeks patients whose asthma was well controlled (n=505) were re-randomised to receive budesonide 400 microg daily and either eformoterol 9 micro g or placebo twice daily for a further 6 months.
                Patients receiving eformoterol achieved asthma control 10 days sooner than those receiving budesonide alone, and improvements in lung function, symptoms, quality of life, and relief beta(2) agonist use were significantly greater with eformoterol. During the 6 month follow up the frequency of mild exacerbations was significantly lower in the eformoterol group than in those receiving budesonide alone (7.2 versus 10.5 per patient, 95% confidence interval for ratio 0.49 to 0.96, p=0.03). The time to first day of poorly controlled asthma was 97 days in the eformoterol group compared with 42 days in the placebo group (p=0.003).
                Adding eformoterol to a low or moderate dose of budesonide in mild asthma resulted in faster and more effective control than treatment with budesonide alone. Eformoterol allowed the corticosteroid dose to be reduced while also decreasing the rate of mild exacerbations compared with budesonide alone. These data suggest a therapeutic advantage of adding eformoterol to inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild to moderate asthma. The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma.
                In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout.
                One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively).
                Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. The effect of adding inhaled salmeterol to inhaled corticosteroids was studied in patients with poorly controlled nocturnal asthma. In a double-blind, cross-over study, 20 patients were randomized to receive either salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily or placebo via a Diskhaler after a 1-week run-in period. After 4 weeks of treatment, patients were subsequently crossed over to receive the other treatment for a further 4 weeks with a 2-week wash-out period in between. The response to treatment was assessed by peak expiratory flow rates (PEF) measured in the morning and evening, symptom scores of asthma, number of bronchodilators used, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) at regular intervals. Patients' preference for the Diskhaler or metered-dose inhaler was assessed at the last visit. The results showed that morning PEF was significantly higher while on salmeterol than on placebo (296.9 +/- 70.2 vs 274.6 +/- 77.4 L/min). Evening PEF showed a trend towards a higher value while on salmeterol than on placebo (321.1 +/- 73.4 vs 288.7 +/- 79.4 L/min), but the difference was not significant. There was no statistically significant improvement in symptom scores, number of rescue bronchodilators used and FEV1 or FVC between the two treatment groups. The occurrence of side effects in terms of tremors and palpitations between treatment and placebo were similar. There were more patients who preferred Diskhaler to metered-dose inhaler (70% vs 30%). We conclude that salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily produces significant improvement in morning PEF and is well tolerated in patients with nocturnal asthma. Diskhaler is a device which is easy to use and preferred to a metered-dose inhaler. To determine the role of formoterol in the treatment of children with bronchial asthma who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids.
                A randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled study to investigate the effects of inhaled formoterol (12 microg twice a day) in 32 children with moderate to severe bronchial asthma. The study consisted of two week run in periods and six week treatment periods, during both of which the patients continued their regular anti-inflammatory drugs. The efficacy parameters were symptom scores, bronchodilator use, daily peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR), methacholine hyper-reactivity, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), lung volumes, and airway conductance.
                Formoterol treatment for six weeks decreased symptom scores, PEFR variability, and the number of rescue salbutamol doses, and increased morning and evening PEFR significantly. No adverse reactions were seen.
                These findings suggest that inhaled formoterol is effective in controlling chronic asthma symptoms in children who are symptomatic despite regular use of inhaled corticosteroids. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (SAL) delivered via a single hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) 134a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with those of its 2 components alone delivered via a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) MDI and placebo (PLA) delivered via HFA MDI in adolescent and adult patients with persistent asthma that was not controlled by medium doses (equivalent to FP 440-660 microg/d) of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).
                This was a randomized, double-blind,placebo-controlled, parallel-group study consisting of a 2-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period followed by a 12-week, double-blind treatment period. Participants had to be > or =12 years of age and have a diagnosis of asthma requiring pharmacotherapy for at least 6 months before the study. Patients had to have used ICS therapy for > or =3 months before the study and at a consistent dose for the previous month. Lack of asthma control was defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) that was 40% to 85% of the predicted value. Patients could not enter the double-blind treatment period if they had 3 days when they required >12 puffs of rescue albuterol per day or >3 nighttime awakenings due to asthma that required treatment with albuterol during the 7 days before the randomization visit. Patients were randomized to receive one of the following treatments delivered via MDI twice daily for 12 weeks: FSC 220/42 microg HFA (2 inhalations of FSC 110/21 microg; 125 microg/21 microg ex-valve); FP 220 microg CFC (2 inhalations of FP 110 microg); SAL 42 microg CFC (2 inhalations of 21 microg); or 2 inhalations of PLA HFA. The primary efficacy end point for FSC versus FP was the mean area under the 12-hour serial FEV(1) curve relative to the prerandomization baseline (FEV(1) AUC(bl)). The primary efficacy end points for FSC versus SAL were the mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end point and the probability of not being withdrawn from the study due to worsening asthma. Tolerability assessments included electrocardiograms, routine clinical laboratory tests, vital signs, oropharyngeal examinations, and physical examinations. Adverse events were assessed at each clinic visit.
                Thirty-two adolescent and 333 adult patients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment. The treatment groups were comparable at baseline with respect to demographic characteristics (mean age, 38-41 years; white race, 78%-88%) and pulmonary function (mean percent predicted FEV(1), 68%-69%; mean asthma symptom score, 1.6 [scale 0-5]; and mean daily albuterol use, 3.1 puffs). After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean FEV(1) AUC(bl) was significantly greater in patients who received FSC compared with those who received FP, SAL, or PLA (7.0, 3.6, 5.3, and 1.4 L-h, respectively; all comparisons, P < or = 0.020). At end point, the mean change from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) for FSC was significantly greater than that for FP, SAL, and PLA (0.41, 0.19, 0.15, and -0.12 L; all comparisons, P < or = 0.001). During 12 weeks of treatment, 7% of patients receiving FSC were withdrawn due to worsening asthma, compared with 24% of patients receiving SAL and 54% of patients receiving PLA (P < 0.001); 11% of patients receiving FP were withdrawn due to worsening asthma. Treatment with FSC resulted in significant improvements in morning and evening peak expiratory flow compared with FP, SAL, and PLA (both, P < 0.001); need for rescue albuterol compared with FP and PLA (P < or =0.005); and asthma symptom scores compared with PLA (P < 0.001). The tolerability of FSC was similar to that of FP or SAL alone. The incidence of possibly drug-related adverse events was generally similar across treatment groups, and the most common (occurring in > or= 2% of patients) were headache (1%-4%), throat irritation (1%-2%), candidiasis of the mouth/throat (0%-2%), unspecified oropharyngeal plaques (0%-2%), and palpitations (0%-2%).
                In these adolescent and adult patients whose asthma was not controlled by medium doses of an ICS, FSC delivered via HFA 134a MDI (2 inhalations of 110/21-microg strength administered BID) was more effective in improving lung function than FP or SAL monotherapy or PLA. All treatments were well tolerated. Exercise is a common trigger of asthma symptoms in patients with persistent asthma.
                To evaluate the protective effect of fluticasone/salmeterol against exercise-induced bronchospasm.
                Multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial of 192 asthma patients who used moderate-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Patients (aged 12-50 years; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 78% of predicted at baseline) were randomized to receive fluticasone/salmeterol (250/50 microg twice daily) or fluticasone alone (250 microg twice daily) via Diskus for 4 weeks. Exercise challenge tests were performed 1 and 8.5 hours after administration of the first (day 1) and last (week 4) doses of blinded study medication.
                On day 1 and at week 4, mean +/- SEM values for the maximal percentage decline in FEV1 1 hour after drug administration were 11.4% +/- 1.5% and 10.9% +/- 1.5% for fluticasone/salmeterol compared with 20.0% +/- 1.7% and 18.4% +/- 1.8% for fluticasone (P < .001). At 8.5 hours, mean +/- SEM values on day 1 and at week 4 were 11.6% +/- 1.4% and 8.9% +/1.1%, respectively, for fluticasone/salmeterol and 12.6% +/- 1.6% and 12.9% +/- 1.4%, respectively, for fluticasone (P = .01 at week 4). More fluticasone-treated patients did not complete the 8.5-hour exercise challenges (36% on day 1 and 33% at week 4) compared with the fluticasone/salmeterol group (18% each) (P < or = .01). Improvements in peak expiratory flow rate and albuterol rescue-free days were significantly greater with fluticasone/salmeterol vs fluticasone over weeks 1 to 4 (P < or = .03).
                Consistent with the improvements in other measures of asthma control, long-term fluticasone/salmeterol therapy also provided protection against exercise-induced bronchospasm in patients with persistent asthma. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) with budesonide alone (Pulmicort) or budesonide (Pulmicort) and formoterol (Oxis) administered via separate inhalers in children with asthma. In a 12 wk, double-blind study, a total of 630 children with asthma (mean age 8 yr [4-11 yr]; mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) 92% predicted; mean inhaled corticosteroid dose 454 microg/day) were randomized to: budesonide/formoterol (80/4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily); a corresponding dose of budesonide alone (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily); or a corresponding dose of budesonide (100 microg, two inhalations twice daily) and formoterol (4.5 microg, two inhalations twice daily) (budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers). The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to treatment (average of the 12-wk treatment period) in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF). Other changes in lung function and asthma symptoms were assessed, as was safety. Budesonide/formoterol significantly improved morning PEF, evening PEF and FEV(1) compared with budesonide (all p < 0.001); there was no significant difference between budesonide/formoterol and budesonide + formoterol in separate inhalers for these variables. All other diary card variables improved from baseline in all treatment groups; there were no significant between-group differences. Adverse-event profiles were similar in all groups; there were no serious asthma-related adverse events in any treatment group. Conclusion: budesonide/formoterol significantly improved lung function in children (aged 4-11 yr) with asthma compared with budesonide alone. Budesonide/formoterol is a safe and effective treatment option for children with asthma. Patients with moderate persistent asthma (n = 523; mean FEV1 77.4%) not fully controlled with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS; 400-1000 microg/day) were randomized to receive either once-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, two inhalations); or twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (160/4.5 microg, one inhalation); or budesonide (400 microg) once-daily for 12 weeks. Once-daily dosing was administered in the evening and twice-daily dosing was administered in the morning and evening. All patients received twice-daily budesonide (200 microg) during a 2-week run-in. Compared with budesonide alone, change in mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow was greater in the once-daily budesonide/formoterol group (27 and 171 min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001) and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol group (23 and 24 l min(-1), respectively; P < 0.001). Night awakenings, symptom-free days, reliever-use-free days and asthma-control days were all improved during once-daily budesonide/formoterol therapy vs. budesonide (P < or = 0.05). Similar improvements were also seen with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (P < or = 0.05). The risk of a mild exacerbation was reduced after once- and twice-daily budesonide/formoterol vs. budesonide (38% and 35%, respectively; P < 0.002). All treatments were well tolerated. Budesonide/formoterol, once- or twice-daily, in a single inhaler improved asthma symptoms and exacerbations compared with budesonide. In the majority of patients with moderate persistent asthma requiring ICS and long-acting beta-agonists, once-daily formoterol/budesonide provided sustained efficacy over 24 h, similar to twice-daily dosing. The role of long-acting, inhaled beta2-agonists in treating asthma is uncertain. In a double-blind study, we evaluated the effects of adding inhaled formoterol to both lower and higher doses of the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide.
                After a four-week run-in period of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily), 852 patients being treated with glucocorticoids were randomly assigned to one of four treatments given twice daily by means of a dry-powder inhaler (Turbuhaler): 100 microg of budesonide plus placebo, 100 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol, 400 microg of budesonide plus placebo, or 400 microg of budesonide plus 12 microg of formoterol. Terbutaline was permitted as needed. Treatment continued for one year; we compared the frequency of exacerbations of asthma, symptoms, and lung function in the four groups. A severe exacerbation was defined by the need for oral glucocorticoids or a decrease in the peak flow to more than 30 percent below the base-line value on two consecutive days.
                The rates of severe and mild exacerbations were reduced by 26 percent and 40 percent, respectively, when formoterol was added to the lower dose of budesonide. The higher dose of budesonide alone reduced the rates of severe and mild exacerbations by 49 percent and 37 percent, respectively. Patients treated with formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide had the greatest reductions -- 63 percent and 62 percent, respectively. Symptoms of asthma and lung function improved with both formoterol and the higher dose of budesonide, but the improvements with formoterol were greater.
                In patients who have persistent symptoms of asthma despite treatment with inhaled glucocorticoids, the addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy or the use of a higher dose of budesonide may be beneficial. The addition of formoterol to budesonide therapy improves symptoms and lung function without lessening the control of asthma.
In adults who are symptomatic on low to high doses of ICS monotherapy, the addition of a LABA at licensed doses reduces the rate of exacerbations requiring oral steroids, improves lung function and symptoms and modestly decreases use of rescue short-acting ß2-agonists. In children, the effects of this treatment option are much more uncertain. The absence of group difference in serious adverse health events and withdrawal rates in both groups provides some indirect evidence of the safety of LABAs at usual doses as add-on therapy to ICS in adults, although the width of the confidence interval precludes total reassurance.