Low-dose formoterol Turbuhaler (Oxis) b.i.d., a 3-month placebo-controlled comparison with terbutaline (q.i.d.). Formoterol, 24 microg bid, and serious asthma exacerbations: similar rates compared with formoterol, 12 microg bid, with and without extra doses taken on demand, and placebo. Long-term efficacy of formoterol compared to salbutamol. Long-term effects of formoterol and salbutamol on bronchial hyperreactivity and beta-adrenoceptor density on lymphocytes in children with bronchial asthma. Efficacy and safety of formoterol Turbuhaler when added to inhaled corticosteroid treatment in children with asthma. Effects of the long acting beta agonist formoterol on asthma control in asthmatic patients using inhaled corticosteroids. The Netherlands and Canadian Formoterol Study Investigators. Efficacy, tolerability, and effect on asthma-related quality of life of formoterol bid via multidose dry powder inhaler and albuterol QID via metered dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Efficacy and tolerability of formoterol Turbuhaler in children. Sustained bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and symptom control during regular formoterol use in asthma of moderate or greater severity. The Canadian FO/OD1 Study Group. Inhaled formoterol dry powder in the treatment of patients with reversible obstructive airway disease. A 3-month, placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy and safety of formoterol and salbutamol, followed by a 12-month trial with formoterol. Is the increase in bronchial responsiveness or FEV1 shortly after cessation of beta2-agonists reflecting a real deterioration of the disease in allergic asthmatic patients? A comparison between short-acting and long-acting beta2-agonists. Efficacy and safety of budesonide and formoterol in one pressurised metered-dose inhaler in adults and adolescents with moderate to severe asthma: a randomised clinical trial. A three-month comparison of twice daily inhaled formoterol versus four times daily inhaled albuterol in the management of stable asthma. Formoterol delivered via the dry powder Aerolizer inhaler versus albuterol MDI and placebo in mild-to-moderate asthma: a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial. A randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing formoterol dry powder inhaler with albuterol metered-dose inhaler. One-year efficacy and safety of inhaled formoterol dry powder in children with persistent asthma. Efficacy and safety of formoterol delivered via a new multidose dry powder inhaler (Certihaler) in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma. Comparison between formoterol 12 microg b.i.d. and on-demand salbutamol in moderate persistent asthma. A 3-month comparison of formoterol with terbutaline via turbuhaler. A placebo-controlled study.
This study compared the efficacy of a low dose of formoterol Turbuhaler 6 micrograms b.i.d. (F) with that of terbutaline 0.5 mg q.i.d. (T), and placebo (P) from Turbuhaler. After a 2-week run-in, 397 adults with mild to moderate asthma were randomly allocated to one of the treatments for 12 weeks. During run-in, the mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 360 (F), 368 (T) and 367 1 min-1 (P). F was better than T (P = 0.014) and P (P = 0.0001) in improving morning PEF [mean changes from run-in: 20 (F), 9 (T), and 21 min-1 (P)]. F was statistically significantly more effective than either T or P in reducing asthma symptoms. F gave also statistically significantly higher evening PEF and less use of rescue medication than P. Bronchodilator response to study drugs and additional 1.25 mg terbutaline was similar before and after the 12-week treatment period. There were no adverse effects of clinical relevance. In conclusion, formoterol Turbuhaler, 6 micrograms b.i.d. was more effective in improving PEF and offered better asthma control than either terbutaline Turbuhaler, 0.5 mg q.i.d. or placebo. Regular use of formoterol did not reduce the bronchodilator response to additional terbutaline. There were no clinically relevant adverse effects. The primary objective was to determine whether high-dose formoterol, 24 mug bid, was associated with more asthma exacerbations compared with lower formoterol doses in patients with stable persistent asthma. Serious asthma exacerbations (life threatening or requiring hospitalization) were the primary end point. Secondary end points included significant exacerbations requiring systemic corticosteroids, all exacerbations, and changes in FEV1.
                In a multicenter, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients were randomized to 16 weeks of treatment with formoterol, 24 microg bid; formoterol, 12 microg bid, with up to two additional 12-microg doses daily on demand for worsening symptoms (12 microg bid plus on demand); formoterol, 12 microg bid; or placebo. The formoterol 12-microg-bid plus on-demand regimen was administered open label, while the other three regimens were double blind.
                Outpatient clinics.
                A total of 2,085 patients aged > or = 12 years with stable, persistent asthma were enrolled and treated; 65% (n = 1,347) received regular concomitant antiinflammatory therapy during the study.
                Nine patients had respiratory-related serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring hospitalization: two patients (0.4%) in the 24-microg-bid group; one patient (0.2%) in the 12-microg-bid plus on-demand group; five patients (0.9%) in the 12-microg-bid group; and one patient (0.2%) in the placebo group. All of these events were asthma related, except for two SAEs in the 12-microg-bid group that were later considered not to be asthma related by independent reviewers who were not associated with the conduct of the study. The proportions of patients with significant asthma exacerbations (requiring systemic corticosteroids) were similar in the 24-microg-bid group (6.3%, 33 of 527 patients), 12-microg-bid group (5.9%, 31 of 527 patients) and placebo group (8.8%, 45 of 514 patients) and lower in the 12-microg-bid plus on-demand group (4.4%, 23 of 517 patients; p = 0.0057 vs placebo). All treatments were well tolerated. All formoterol treatment regimens had a significant effect on FEV1 measured 2 h after dose during the study (p < 0.0001 vs placebo); and on predose trough FEV1 measured at all visits after baseline (p < 0.002 vs placebo).
                Treatment with formoterol, 24 microg bid, was not associated with an increase in serious asthma exacerbations compared with the lower formoterol doses or placebo. In a randomized, double-blind, between-patient, multicenter study in 301 patients with ROAD, the efficacy and tolerability of the new long-acting selective beta 2-sympathicomimetic drug formoterol (12 micrograms inhalation b.i.d.) was compared with salbutamol (200 micrograms inhalation q.i.d.). There was no statistically significant (s.s.) difference in acute reversibility and long-term efficacy of both drugs, measured by the point in time of expected maximal effect. However, formoterol had a highly s.s. longer duration of action than salbutamol, as shown by peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements: the overall mean morning PEF in the formoterol group was 341 L/min. 14 h after the last taken dose and in the salbutamol group this measure was 304 L/min 9 h after the last dose. The patients taking formoterol had s.s. less asthma attacks and needed s.s. less rescue medication than those taking salbutamol. In the global assessment of efficacy, formoterol was accepted as being s.s. better ("very good" + "good": 76%) than salbutamol ("very good" + "good": 50%). The tolerability of each drug, as reflected by adverse reactions and global assessment, was equally good in both groups. Ninety-one percent of the patients in the formoterol group wanted to receive the same drug again versus 79% in the salbutamol group. Long-term treatment with short-acting beta 2-sympathomimetic drugs has recently been suggested to be due to a rise in asthma mortality. This effect has been attributed to an increase in bronchial hyperreactivity, a desensitization of beta 2-adrenoceptors and/or a rebound effect after cessation of the therapy. Formoterol, a new long-acting beta 2-symathomimetic drug, has been reported to possess not only bronchodilatation but also antiinflammatory effects. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether long-term effects of salbutamol and/or formoterol could deteriorate asthma management. Therefore, in a trial lasting 90 days, we evaluated the effects of the two drugs on lung function, on the protection they provided against inhalative provocation with histamine, and on tachyphylaxis as monitored by the beta-adrenergic density on mononuclear leukocytes (MNL). Two groups of 11 children each with stable asthma were treated with daily doses of either 4 x 200 micrograms salbutamol or 2 x 24 micrograms formoterol in monotherapy. The lung function was measured six times during the trial period, on day 1, and on day 90, before and after inhaling the drug and at all investigations both with and without histamine provocation. In both groups, the bronchodilatory effect of either formoterol or salbutamol remained constant. The lung function values before and after drug inhalation (specific airway resistance sRAW, forced expiration volume FEV1, vital capacity VC) did not alter significantly. After histamine provocation, the protection was more pronounced in the formoterol group. No changes in the beta-adrenoceptor density on MNL and no significant side effects were seen throughout the trial period. We therefore conclude that formoterol protects significantly better against the bronchial challenge with histamine than does salbutamol. Both drugs did not deteriorate the lung function in asthmatic children. In addition, there was no evidence that long-term treatment leads to a desensitization of beta 2-sympathomimetic effects. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter study was conducted in 302 children aged 6-11 years with asthma not optimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone. Patients continued with their existing dose of inhaled corticosteroids and in addition received placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg or formoterol 9 microg b.i.d., for 12 weeks (all delivered via Turbuhaler). Terbutaline was available as reliever medication. The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF); secondary efficacy variables included forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)), serial PEF measured over 12 hr, evening PEF, asthma symptom score, and quality of life. Compared with placebo, formoterol 4.5 microg and 9 microg improved morning PEF by 8 l/min (P = 0.035) and 11 l/min (P = 0.0045), respectively. Evening PEF and FEV(1) were also significantly increased compared with placebo, with no statistically significant difference between formoterol doses. Lung-function improvements compared with placebo were greater in the middle of the day. Twelve-hour average serial PEF after 3 months increased by 24 l/min (95% CI, 9, 39 l/min) in the formoterol 9-microg group, and by 14 l/min (95% CI, 0, 29 l/min) in the formoterol 4.5-microg group. The incidence of severe exacerbations in both formoterol groups was numerically lower than in the placebo group, indicating that formoterol may have the potential to improve exacerbation control in children. Both formoterol doses were well-tolerated, and tolerance to the drug's bronchodilator effect was not observed. Formoterol provided sustained improvements in lung function and was well-tolerated in children with asthma suboptimally treated with inhaled corticosteroids alone.
                Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The long acting beta 2 agonist formoterol has proved to be an effective bronchodilator with a prolonged action of 12-14 hours. However, the precise role of formoterol in the maintenance treatment of asthma is still under debate. A study was performed to investigate the efficacy and safety of treatment with formoterol for six months in subjects with asthma.
                In a multicentre double blind, placebo controlled, parallel group study 239 subjects with mild to moderate asthma were randomly assigned to treatment with either inhaled formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily (n = 125) or placebo (n = 114) during eight months. The study consisted of a four week run in period, a 24 week treatment period, and a four week washout period. All subjects were using regular inhaled corticosteroids (100-3200 micrograms daily) but were still needing at least five inhalations of short acting beta 2 agonist per week for symptom relief. The study was performed in 10 outpatient clinics in Canada, and five outpatient clinics and one coordinating centre for 44 Dutch general practitioners in The Netherlands. Twice daily self-reported peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements, symptom scores, and rescue beta 2 agonist use during the last 28 treatment days compared with baseline values were used as main outcome measures. Spirometric values were measured at entry, at the start of treatment, after four, 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, and after four weeks washout.
                One hundred and twenty five subjects received formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily via Turbohaler and 114 received placebo. Baseline FEV1 was 67.1% predicted and mean bronchodilator reversibility was 26%. The mean total asthma symptom score was 3.6 (maximum possible 21). A significant decrease in symptoms in favour of formoterol (difference from placebo -0.64, 95% CI -0.04 to -1.23, p = 0.04) was observed. Compared with placebo, morning PEF increased (difference from placebo 28 l/min, 95% CI 18.3 to 37.7, p = 0.0001) and the use of short acting beta 1 agonists decreased (daytime difference from placebo -1.1 inhalation, 95% CI -1.4 to -0.7, p = 0.0001) in the formoterol group. PEF returned to baseline following discontinuation of formoterol, as did asthma symptom scores. Thirty three patients treated with formoterol and 32 treated with placebo required treatment with prednisolone during the study (58 and 55 courses, respectively).
                Adding formoterol 24 micrograms twice daily by Turbohaler to inhaled corticosteroids was effective in improving symptom scores and morning PEF, and decreasing the use of rescue beta 2 agonists. There was no apparent loss of asthma control during 24 weeks of treatment with formoterol. Inhaled beta(2)-agonists are widely used in asthma treatment. The design limitations of pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) have prompted the development of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) for the delivery of asthma medications.
                The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and effect on asthma-related quality of life (QOL) of a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoreceptor agonist, formoterol, delivered via multidose DPI, compared with albuterol delivered via pMDI or placebo in adolescents and adults with persistent asthma.
                This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted in outpatient clinics at 18 US centers. Adolescents and adults with persistent asthma received formoterol 10 pg BID via multidose DPI, albuterol 180 microg QID via pMDI, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the 12-hour AUC of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) after 12 weeks treatment. Secondary efficacy variables included asthma-related QOL, asthma symptom scores, rescue medication use, and other pulmonary function measures.
                A total of 239 patients (147 females, 92 males; age range, 13-85 years) with persistent asthma were enrolled (formoterol, n = 80; albuterol, n = 79; placebo, n = 80). Formoterol delivered via the multidose DPI resulted in clinically relevant and statistically significant increases in 12-hour AUC of FEV(1) after 12 weeks of treatment compared with albuterol pMDI and placebo (P < 0.019 and P < 0.001, respectively). Asthma-related QOL (total score) was significantly improved with formoterol treatment compared with placebo (P < 0.015). Nocturnal asthma symptom scores significantly improved with formoterol compared with albuterol and placebo (P < 0.001 and P < 0.003, respectively) and rescue medication use was significantly less with formoterol compared with albuterol and placebo (P < 0.004 and P < 0.002, respectively). Treatment with formoterol was well tolerated.
                In this study of adolescents and adults with persistent asthma, 12 weeks of treatment with formoterol 10 microg BID delivered via a multidose DPI provided significantly greater 24-hour bronchodilation compared with albuterol and placebo and resulted in significant improvements in asthma-related QOL compared with placebo. Formoterol was well tolerated in these patients. A randomised, double-blind trial was undertaken to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of formoterol Turbuhaler in children with mild to moderate asthma. After a two-week run-in, 248 children aged 6-17 years were randomised to receive formoterol 4.5 and 9 pmicro b.i.d. or placebo for 12 weeks. Morning PEF (primary variable), was significantly improved versus placebo only in the formoterol 9 pmicro b.i.d. group (13 l/min, 95% CCI 1.9, 24.2%; p = 0 .02). Both formoterol 4.5 and 9 pmicro significantly increased the pre-bronchodilator FEV1 by 5.2-6.7% (p < 0 .05) and reduced use of daytime relief medication versus placebo (p < 0 .05). Formoterol 9 pmicro significantly reduced night-time reliever use and awakenings due to asthma versus placebo (p < 0.05). Both doses of formoterol were as well tolerated as placebo. In conclusion, formoterol 4.5 and 9 micro b.i.d. is effective and well tolerated as maintenance therapy in children with mild to moderate asthma. Recent studies have raised concern that regular inhalation of beta2 -agonists may cause a worsening of asthma control compared with on-demand dosing regimens.
                The objective of this study was to compare the effect of twice daily formoterol (Foradil), 4 times daily albuterol, and on-demand albuterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), lung function measurements, symptoms, and other indicators of disease control over 6 months inpatients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving concomitant inhaled corticosteroids. We also looked for occurrence of rebound BHR on discontinuation of treatment.
                This was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, clinical trial. Methacholine PC20 was the primary outcome variable. Other outcome variables included symptom scores, use of rescue medication, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF), serial FEV1 measurements, and asthma exacerbations.
                Of the 271 randomized patients, 217 completed the study. Formoterol was significantly superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to methacholine PC20, FEV1, PEF, symptom scores, and use of rescue medication at each measured time point/interval. Regular albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol with regard to PC20 and FEV1, but not PEF or various clinical scores. After a small drop in the magnitude of bronchoprotection and bronchodilatation occurring shortly after randomization, there was no evidence of progressive tolerance to either regular treatment for any of the measured variables or of rebound increase in BHR 2 days after the end of treatment. The formoterol group had the lowest number of exacerbation days, as defined by high intake of rescue bronchodilator and/or symptom scores, whereas the number of exacerbations requiring increased corticosteroid coverage was similar in the 3 groups.
                In patients with asthma of moderate or greater severity receiving inhaled corticosteroids, formoterol taken twice daily resulted in superior bronchoprotection, bronchodilatation, and clinical control compared with on-demand albuterol over 6 months. Four times daily albuterol was superior to on-demand albuterol for only some of the end points. Progressive tolerance and a rebound increase in BHR on discontinuation of beta-agonists were not found Inhaled formoterol is a potent selective beta 2-agonist with rapid onset and at least 12-h duration of bronchodilation. The aim of the study was to compare the bronchodilating effect of inhaled formoterol dry powder (dp) 12 micrograms b.i.d. with salbutamol dp 400 micrograms q.i.d. and placebo in patients with reversible obstructive airway disease (ROAD). The study design consisted of a closed 12-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial followed by an open noncomparative, multicenter, 12-month follow-up trial, in which the tolerability of formoterol dp was assessed. A total of 304 patients (146 men, 158 women) aged 18-79 years, ill during 0.1-64 years, were randomized. No demographic or baseline differences were found among the different treatment groups. The bronchodilating effect of formoterol, assessed by morning premedication PEFR, was significantly superior to placebo (P < 0.0001) and salbutamol (P < 0.0001). Efficacy was maintained during the open follow-up study with 12 micrograms b.i.d. in most of the patients. A few patients, however, needed 24 micrograms b.i.d. to control their ROAD. Formoterol 12 micrograms b.i.d. significantly reduced morning and evening asthma symptoms and sleep disturbances, and reduced significantly the need for rescue medication. The tolerability of the three treatment groups was comparable. In conclusion, formoterol 12 micrograms dp b.i.d. was significantly superior to both salbutamol 400 micrograms dp q.i.d. and placebo, and reduced asthma symptoms significantly. Overall, formoterol showed a tolerability profile comparable to that of salbutamol, and no tachyphylaxis was observed during 1 year of treatment. Regular use of beta2-agonists might result in increased bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR) and decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1). It has been suggested that these possible detrimental effects are not a real deterioration of the disease, but that it might be only a transient (rebound) effect shortly after discontinuing this regular use. Moreover, these effects are thought to occur especially during short-acting and not during long-acting beta2-agonists use. The aim of this study was to invest gate whether a rebound effect (a pharmacological deterioration effect diminishing after several hours) in FEV1 and PC20 (concentration of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 with regard to baseline) occurred after cessation of regular use of beta2-agonists, and whether this occurred both after short-acting and long-acting beta2-agonists. Allergic asthmatic patients (n = 134) were randomly allocated to the use of a short-acting (salbutamol), a long-acting beta2-agonist (formoterol) or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blind, double-dummy). No other asthma medication was allowed, including inhaled corticosteroids. At the start and every 4 weeks later FEV and PC20 were measured, each time at least 12 h after the last doses of study medication, which is in the possible rebound period. To investigate whether a (transient) rebound effect occurred, parameters were additionally measured at least 72 h later after discontinuation of the study medication. After 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, a drop was seen in FEV1 from 85.6 (+/- 2.21)% predicted to 78.8 (+/- 2.9)% predicted, measured 15 h (median) after the last doses of medication. This was significantly different compared to placebo. When measured 168 h (median) later FEV1 recovered to 85.5 (+/- 2.4)% predicted, comparable to baseline. PC20 decreased with -1.17 (+/- 0.44) doubling dose after 12 weeks of short-acting beta2-agonist use, measured 15 h after the last doses of medication, which was significantly different compared to placebo. However, 168 h later PC20 recovered slightly with +0.55 (+/- 0.34) doubling dose, but this value was still lower compared to placebo. In contrast, during long-acting beta2-agonist and placebo use no significant changes were seen. In conclusion, the use of short-acting beta2-agonists resulted in a transient (rebound) effect in FEV while the effects on PC20 may point to a real deterioration of the disease. Long-acting beta2-agonist and placebo use showed no changes. We conclude that a mono-therapy of short-acting and not of long-acting beta2-agonists might have deleterious effects in asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the preferred maintenance therapy for adults and children with mild, moderate and severe persistent asthma, with the addition of a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist to ICS therapy recommended for patients with moderate or severe persistent asthma. The efficacy and safety of the combination of budesonide and formoterol delivered via dry powder inhaler (DPI) is well documented.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol pressurised metered-dose inhaler (budesonide/formoterol pMDI; Symbicort pMDI, AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA) with budesonide pMDI (Pulmicort pMDI, Astra [corrected] Zeneca, Lund, Sweden), formoterol DPI (Oxis Turbuhaler, AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden), budesonide plus formoterol in separate inhalers (budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI) and placebo.
                This was a 12-week randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled study.
                This multicentre study was conducted in the respiratory specialty clinical practice setting.
                The study included 596 patients > or =12 years of age with moderate to severe persistent asthma previously receiving ICSs.
                After 2 weeks on budesonide pMDI 80 microg x two inhalations (160 microg) twice daily, patients received budesonide/formoterol pMDI 160 microg/4.5 microg x two inhalations (320 microg/9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg) + formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); budesonide pMDI 160 microg x two inhalations (320 microg); formoterol DPI 4.5 microg x two inhalations (9 microg); or placebo twice daily.
                There were two prespecified primary efficacy variables: mean change from baseline in morning predose forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)), obtained approximately 12 hours after the most recent administration of study medication at home and immediately before the next administration of study medication at the clinic; and mean change from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1), assessed as the average change in FEV(1) from serial spirometry over the 12-hour period after administration of the morning dose of study medication at the clinic.
                Mean changes from baseline in morning predose FEV(1) at end of treatment were greater (p < or = 0.049) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI (0.19L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.10L), formoterol DPI (-0.12L) and placebo (-0.17L). Mean changes from baseline in 12-hour FEV(1) were greater (p < or = 0.001) with budesonide/formoterol pMDI after 1 day (0.37L), 2 weeks (0.34L) and at end of treatment (0.37L) versus budesonide pMDI (0.11, 0.15 and 0.15L) and placebo (0.09, -0.03 and -0.03L), and after 2 weeks and at end of treatment versus formoterol DPI (0.19 and 0.17L). Fewer (p < or = 0.025) patients receiving budesonide/formoterol pMDI versus monoproducts or placebo met worsening asthma criteria. Results were similar in the budesonide/formoterol pMDI group and the budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI group on all measures. All treatments were well tolerated with similar safety profiles.
                In this population, twice-daily budesonide/formoterol pMDI provides asthma control significantly greater than the monocomponents or placebo and comparable with budesonide pMDI + formoterol DPI. Safety profiles were similar for all treatments. We compared the efficacy of inhaled formoterol, a long-acting beta 2-agonist, with inhaled albuterol in 145 stable adult asthmatics in a 12-wk multicenter trial. Patients were allocated in randomized double-blind fashion to maintenance therapy with either formoterol 12 micrograms twice a day or albuterol 200 micrograms four times a day in addition to their other asthma medications. Patients were allowed to use "rescue" 100-micrograms albuterol puffs on an as-needed basis. Mean baseline FEV, in the morning before bronchodilator was 2.14 +/- 0.76 L and 1.98 +/- 0.71 L for the formoterol and albuterol groups, respectively, these values being used as baseline covariates in subsequent analysis of predrug and postdrug FEV1. Measured at each clinic visit, morning predrug FEV1 rose significantly with formoterol treatment and was significantly greater at all visits than in the albuterol group, the greatest difference being in Week 8 (2.40 +/- 0.77 versus 1.92 +/- 0.66 L, p less than 0.001). Morning FEV1 30 min postdrug was significantly higher in the formoterol group at Weeks 2 and 8, the trend not reaching statistical significance at other times. Diurnal variation in prebronchodilator peak flow rates was significantly reduced in the formoterol group throughout the trial (17 versus 42 L/min at Week 12, p less than 0.0001). The number of asthma episodes per week was significantly less in the formoterol group during Weeks 4, 8, and 12 as were the number of sleep disruptions during Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12. Significantly more rescue albuterol was required in the albuterol group by Week 2 and throughout the remainder of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The objectives of this study were to compare the efficacy and tolerability of twice-daily formoterol dry powder 12 microg and 24 microg (Foradil) delivered via Aerolizer inhaler with four times daily albuterol (salbutamol) 180 microg delivered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) and placebo. A total of 554 adolescents and adults (ages 12-75 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma were randomized to this 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Twelve-hour spirometry measurements were taken at weeks 0, 4, 8, and 12. A total of 484 patients completed the study (122, 116, 127, and 119 given formoterol 12 microg, formoterol 24 microg, albuterol, and placebo, respectively). For the primary efficacy variable, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), both formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg were statistically superior to placebo at all time points on all test days (p < or = 0.017) and to albuterol at most time points on all test days (p < or = 0.001). The onset of improvement in FEV1 was rapid, with 15% increase within 5 min in 57%, 71%, and 65% of formoterol 12 microg, formoterol 24 microg, and albuterol patients, respectively. Formoterol was also superior to placebo and albuterol in terms of secondary efficacy variables: FEV1 area under the curve, percentage of predicted FEV1, forced vital capacity and forced expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, and peak expiratory flows. In conclusion, both formoterol doses were superior to placebo in all lung function measurements. Overall, compared with albuterol, both formoterol doses produced superior bronchodilation. Formoterol and albuterol were safe and well-tolerated. Formoterol is a beta2-adrenergic agent which, when inhaled, produces rapid and long-lasting bronchodilatation.
                The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of formoterol powder for inhalation delivered via the Aerolizer device with placebo and with albuterol delivered via metered-dose inhaler in patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma.
                In a multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, 541 patients were randomized at 26 trial sites to receive either formoterol, 12 microg twice daily; formoterol, 24 microg twice daily; albuterol, 180 microg four times daily; or a placebo for 12 weeks. The effects of each treatment on lung function, asthma symptoms, and frequency of rescue albuterol use were evaluated. Adverse effects and clinical laboratory parameters were also evaluated.
                The bronchodilatory effects of formoterol were rapid in onset and persisted for 12 hours. Both formoterol doses were more effective than placebo and albuterol for objective measures of lung function. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates were more improved with formoterol, and formoterol provided significantly greater improvements in asthma symptom scores compared with both albuterol and placebo. Overall, patients taking formoterol used significantly less rescue medication than did those taking albuterol or placebo. Nocturnal awakenings occurred less often with formoterol than with placebo or albuterol. The therapeutic effects of formoterol were maintained over the entire 12 weeks of treatment. Adverse events were similar for all treatment groups, and clinical laboratory data were unremarkable.
                Rapid-onset, long-acting formoterol, administered via the Aerolizer inhaler, is an effective and safe treatment for patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The long-term efficacy and safety of formoterol dry powder capsules for inhalation in pediatric asthma have not previously been evaluated.
                We examined the effectiveness of inhaled formoterol over a period of 12 months in asthmatic children who were still symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory treatment.
                After a run-in period, 518 patients (5 to 12 years old) were randomized in a double-blind manner to receive 12 or 24 microg formoterol dry powder (Foradil, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) or placebo twice daily for 12 months. The drug was administered by inhaler (Aerolizer, Novartis Pharma AG) and was given in addition to their anti-inflammatory treatment. The primary variable was the area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second measured over 12 hours after the morning dose of study medication.
                The area under the curve for forced expiratory volume in 1 second after the first dose of treatment and after 3 and 12 months of treatment was significantly greater for patients receiving formoterol 12 microg and 24 microg than for patients receiving placebo (all P < or = 0.0062). Compared with placebo, both doses of formoterol significantly improved morning and evening premedication peak expiratory flow rate (all P < 0.001). In the group treated with formoterol 24 microg, median symptom score and median dose of rescue medication at night were lower than during the run-in period, whereas the opposite occurred in the placebo group. The incidence of hospitalizations for asthma was higher in the formoterol groups than in the placebo group.
                Our results indicate that, in asthmatic children who are still symptomatic despite anti-inflammatory therapy, the addition of formoterol consistently improves airflow obstruction and nocturnal symptoms and reduces the use of rescue medication. However, this treatment requires close disease monitoring to detect early signs of acute exacerbation. Our objective was to compare the efficacy and safety of formoterol (Foradil) delivered via a novel multidose dry powder inhaler (Certihaler) with placebo and albuterol [pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI)], in patients with persistent asthma. After a 2-week run-in phase, 265 patients (13-81 years) previously treated with regular/PRN bronchodilators for persistent asthma were randomized to 12 weeks' double-blind treatment with formoterol 10 microg BID via Certihaler (n = 86), albuterol 180 microg QID via pMDI (n = 88) or placebo (n = 91). The primary efficacy variable was 12-hour AUC of FEV1 after 12 weeks' treatment. Secondary efficacy variables included peak expiratory flow (PEF), rescue bronchodilator medication use, asthma-related quality of life (Juniper Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire), and asthma symptom scores. Formoterol via the Certihaler had an onset of action within 5 minutes and was associated with a clinically relevant and statistically significant increase in 12-hour AUC of FEV1 after 12 weeks' treatment compared with placebo and albuterol (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Average PEF was significantly superior for formoterol compared with placebo and albuterol (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). Compared with placebo, rescue albuterol use during the study was significantly lower for formoterol (p < 0.01) and was accompanied by a trend toward an improvement in asthma-related quality of life (QoL). Asthma symptom scores improved to a similar extent for all treatment groups. Treatment with formoterol via Certihaler was well tolerated. Formoterol 10 microg BID, delivered via the novel Certihaler device, is well tolerated and provides rapid, long-lasting, and clinically superior bronchodilation to placebo and albuterol via pMDI in patients with persistent asthma. Inhalation of on-demand salbutamol (ODS) several times daily is sometimes the only beta2-agonist prescribed in moderate persistent asthma, whereas a long-acting beta2-agonist should be added. This trial aimed to compare the efficacy of formoterol dry-powder capsule 12 microg b.i.d. (Foradil) and ODS in patients with moderate persistent asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroids, in the conditions of real practice. Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were randomized (formoterol; 130; ODS: 129) in this open, parallel-group trial. The mean increases in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF primary variable) and evening PEF over the 3-month treatment period were statistically significantly higher with formoterol: +25.7 and +24.1 l min(-1), respectively vs. +4.5 and +0.5 l min(-1) respectively with ODS. The increase in FEV1 was statistically significantly higher with formoterol at months 1 and 3. Formoterol reduced the use of salbutamol as rescue medication by two-thirds. The percentages of symptom-free days and nights statistically significantly increased with formoterol (+20% and +33% respectively), but did not significantly change with ODS. Clinically relevant and statistically significant improvement in the mean total score of the St George's Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire was observed in the formoterol group. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. The results show that treatment with formoterol has significant advantages over ODS in patients with moderate persistent asthma. Oxis Turbuhaler is a new dry powder formulation of long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol. This study compared the efficacy and safety of regular use of the long-acting beta2-agonist formoterol and the short-acting terbutaline for 3 months in patients with asthma.
                After 1-week run-in, 343 patients received either formoterol 12 microg bid (F) (delivered dose of 9 microg), terbutaline 500 microg qid (T) or placebo qid, in a parallel-group, double-blind, randomized manner. They had a mean of 61% of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and a mean reversibility of 26%. Eighty-nine percent used inhaled corticosteroids.
                During run-in mean morning peak expiratory flow (PEF L/min) for F was 366 and 348 for T, and 344 for placebo (P). The F group improved morning PEF significantly compared with P (P = .0022) and T (P = .0001). Changes from run-in were + 18, -1.5, and +5 L/min after F, T, and P, respectively. The F group was statistically significantly better than P and T in increasing evening PEF and in reducing night-time asthma. The F and T statistically significantly reduced the use of rescue medication compared with P. The bronchodilating response to the study drug and to an additional 1.25 mg terbutaline was of the same magnitude before and throughout the study. No statistically significant treatment-by-time interaction was observed (P > .20). There were no adverse effects of clinical relevance.
                Formoterol Turbuhaler, 12 microg bid, was more effective than terbutaline Turbuhaler, 0.5 mg qid, and placebo. Regular use of formoterol or terbutaline did not significantly influence the response to additional inhalation of terbutaline.
In comparison with placebo, we have found an increased risk of serious adverse events with regular formoterol, and this does not appear to be abolished in patients taking inhaled corticosteroids. The effect on serious adverse events of regular formoterol in children was greater than the effect in adults, but the difference between age groups was not significant.
Data on all-cause serious adverse events should be more fully reported in journal articles, and not combined with all severities of adverse events or limited to those events that are thought by the investigator to be drug-related.