A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Bronchodilator efficacy of tiotropium in patients with mild to moderate COPD. The effect of tiotropium on hyperinflation and exercise capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Effect of tiotropium on health-related quality of life as a primary efficacy endpoint in COPD. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Efficacy and safety of tiotropium Respimat SMI in COPD in two 1-year randomized studies. A one-year trial of tiotropium Respimat plus usual therapy in COPD patients. A randomized study of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist inhaler vs. ipratropium pMDI in COPD. Health outcomes following treatment for six months with once daily tiotropium compared with twice daily salmeterol in patients with COPD. Effect of tiotropium on sputum and serum inflammatory markers and exacerbations in COPD. Tiotropium improves FEV1 in patients with COPD irrespective of smoking status. [Efficacy of tiotropium bromide (Spiriva) in patients with chronic-obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) of different severities]. Prevention of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with tiotropium, a once-daily inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator: a randomized trial. Improvements with tiotropium in COPD patients with concomitant asthma. A randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of tiotropium in Canadian patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Efficacy and safety of tiotropium in COPD patients in primary care--the SPiRiva Usual CarE (SPRUCE) study. Absence of electrocardiographic findings and improved function with once-daily tiotropium in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Assessing the Impact of Tiotropium on Lung Function and Physical Activity in GOLD Stage II COPD Patients who are Naïve to Maintenance Respiratory Therapy: A Study Protocol. The effect of tiotropium on exacerbations and airflow in patients with COPD. Development and implementation of treadmill exercise testing protocols in COPD.
Currently available inhaled bronchodilators used as therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) necessitate multiple daily dosing. The present study evaluates the long-term safety and efficacy of tiotropium, a new once-daily anticholinergic in COPD. Patients with stable COPD (age 65.2+/-8.7 yrs (mean+/-SD), n=921) were enrolled in two identical randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 1-yr studies. Patients inhaled tiotropium 18 microg or placebo (mean screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 1.01 versus 0.99 L, 39.1 and 38.1% of the predicted value) once daily as a dry powder. The primary spirometric outcome was trough FEV1 (i.e. FEV1 prior to dosing). Changes in dyspnoea were measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index, and health status with the disease-specific St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire and the generic Short Form 36. Medication use and adverse events were recorded. Tiotropium provided significantly superior bronchodilation relative to placebo for trough FEV1 response (approximately 12% over baseline) (p<0.01) and mean response during the 3 h following dosing (approximately 22% over baseline) (p<0.001) over the 12-month period. Tiotropium recipients showed less dyspnoea (p<0.001), superior health status scores, and fewer COPD exacerbations and hospitalizations (p<0.05). Adverse events were comparable with placebo, except for dry mouth incidence (tiotropium 16.0% versus placebo 2.7%, p<0.05). Tiotropium is an effective, once-daily bronchodilator that reduces dyspnoea and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation frequency and improves health status. This suggests that tiotropium will make an important contribution to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease therapy. Evaluation of tiotropium efficacy in patients with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) defined by the 2003 Swedish Society of Respiratory Medicine guidelines (post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <70%; FEV1 >60% predicted).
                In this 12-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of tiotropium 18 mcg once daily versus placebo, respiratory function was assessed on Days 1, 15 and 85 (baseline: pre-dose Day 1).
                Mean+/-SD baseline FEV1 (% predicted) was 73.4+/-12.5 (tiotropium, n=107; placebo, n=117). Tiotropium significantly improved change from baseline in area under the curve from pre-dose to 2 hours post-dose (AUC0-2 h) FEV1 versus placebo, by 166+/-26 mL (mean+/-SE) at study end (p<0.0001). With tiotropium, there were significant increases in the change in AUC0-2 h FVC versus baseline, and trough FEV1 and FVC, versus placebo, on all test days (p<0.01). Adverse event rates were similar.
                Compared with placebo, tiotropium improved lung function in patients with mild COPD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by airflow limitation, which results in the progressive development of dyspnea and exercise limitation.
                To compare the effect of tiotropium with placebo on forced vital capacity (FVC) in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and lung hyperinflation, using exercise endurance, dyspnea and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as secondary endpoints. One hundred patients were randomized to receive either tiotropium 18 mug once daily or placebo for 12 weeks.
                Trough (predose) FVC was significantly improved with tiotropium compared to placebo on day 42 (0.27 +/- 0.08 liters) and 84 (0.20 +/- 0.08 liters; p < 0.05 for both). Trough inspiratory capacity (IC) was also significantly improved with tiotropium compared to placebo on day 42 (0.16 +/- 0.07 liters) and 84 (0.15 +/- 0.07 liters; p < 0.05 for both). Tiotropium increased the mean distance walked during the shuttle walking test by 33 +/- 12 (day 42) and 36 +/- 14 m (day 84) compared to placebo (p < 0.05 for both). On day 84, 59% of the patients in the tiotropium group and 35% of the patients in the placebo group had significant and clinically meaningful improvements in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score (p < 0.05). Numerical decreases in the focal score in the Transition Dyspnea Index in patients receiving tiotropium versus placebo suggest that tiotropium also improved dyspnea during activities of daily living.
                Tiotropium 18 mug once daily reduced hyperinflation with consequent improvements in walking distance and HRQoL in patients with COPD and lung hyperinflation. Clinical manifestations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), including airflow limitation, dyspnea, and activity limitation, ultimately lead to impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This 9-month, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study compared the effect of once-daily tiotropium 18 microg and placebo on HRQoL, spirometric parameters, and exacerbations in 554 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. HRQoL was assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the new 8-item Visual Simplified Respiratory Questionnaire (VSRQ), which is currently being validated. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a reduction of at least 4 units in the SGRQ total score at study end (Month 9). Mean +/- SD baseline SGRQ total score was 47.4 +/- 18.1. Significantly more tiotropium-treated patients achieved a reduction of at least 4 units in the SGRQ score vs placebo at study end (59.1% vs 48.2%, respectively; p = 0.029). Tiotropium significantly improved spirometric parameters (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]: 0.11 +/- 0.02 L vs 0.01 +/- 0.02 L; between-group difference: 0.10 +/- 0.03 L, p = 0.0001) and reduced exacerbations vs placebo. Maintenance treatment with tiotropium provided significant and clinically relevant improvements in HRQoL, as measured by the SGRQ. Previous studies showing that tiotropium improves multiple end points in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) led us to examine the long-term effects of tiotropium therapy.
                In this randomized, double-blind trial, we compared 4 years of therapy with either tiotropium or placebo in patients with COPD who were permitted to use all respiratory medications except inhaled anticholinergic drugs. The patients were at least 40 years of age, with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) of 70% or less after bronchodilation and a ratio of FEV(1) to forced vital capacity (FVC) of 70% or less. Coprimary end points were the rate of decline in the mean FEV(1) before and after bronchodilation beginning on day 30. Secondary end points included measures of FVC, changes in response on St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), exacerbations of COPD, and mortality.
                Of a total of 5993 patients (mean age, 65+/-8 years) with a mean FEV(1) of 1.32+/-0.44 liters after bronchodilation (48% of predicted value), we randomly assigned 2987 to the tiotropium group and 3006 to the placebo group. Mean absolute improvements in FEV(1) in the tiotropium group were maintained throughout the trial (ranging from 87 to 103 ml before bronchodilation and from 47 to 65 ml after bronchodilation), as compared with the placebo group (P<0.001). After day 30, the differences between the two groups in the rate of decline in the mean FEV(1) before and after bronchodilation were not significant. The mean absolute total score on the SGRQ was improved (lower) in the tiotropium group, as compared with the placebo group, at each time point throughout the 4-year period (ranging from 2.3 to 3.3 units, P<0.001). At 4 years and 30 days, tiotropium was associated with a reduction in the risks of exacerbations, related hospitalizations, and respiratory failure.
                In patients with COPD, therapy with tiotropium was associated with improvements in lung function, quality of life, and exacerbations during a 4-year period but did not significantly reduce the rate of decline in FEV(1). (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00144339.)
                2008 Massachusetts Medical Society Two 1-year studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg versus placebo, inhaled via the Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI). The two studies were combined and had 4 co-primary endpoints (trough FEV(1) response, Mahler Transition Dyspnea Index [TDI] and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores all at week 48, and COPD exacerbations per patient-year). A total of 1990 patients with COPD participated (mean FEV(1): 1.09 L). The mean trough FEV(1) response of tiotropium 5 or 10 microg relative to placebo was 127 or 150 mL, respectively (both P < 0.0001). The COPD exacerbation rate was significantly lower with tiotropium 5 microg (RR = 0.78; P = 0.002) and tiotropium 10 microg (RR = 0.73; P = 0.0008); the health-related quality of life and Mahler TDI co-primary endpoints were significantly improved with both doses (both P < 0.0001). Adverse events were generally balanced except anticholinergic class effects, which were more frequent with active treatment. Fatal events occurred in 2.4% (5 microg), 2.7% (10 microg), and 1.6% (placebo) of patients; these differences were not significant. Tiotropium Respimat SMI 5 microg demonstrated sustained improvements in patients with COPD relative to placebo and similar to the 10 microg dose but with a lower frequency of anticholinergic adverse events. In this randomised double-blind study, patients >or=40 years old with COPD, a smoking history of >or=10 pack-years, a pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) of <or=60% predicted and an FEV(1)/FVC of <or=70% received tiotropium 5 microg or placebo via Respimat inhaler once daily for 48 weeks. Other medications were permitted except inhaled anticholinergics. Co-primary endpoints were trough FEV(1) and the time to first exacerbation. Adverse events were followed and vital status regularly assessed. In all, 3991 patients (mean age, 65 years [SD, 9 years]) were evaluable. Mean baseline FEV(1) was 1.11 L (0.40 L) or 40% (12%) of predicted normal. Adjusted mean differences in trough FEV(1) and trough FVC at Week 48 (tiotropium minus placebo) were 102 and 168 ml respectively (p < 0.0001, both). Tiotropium delayed time to first exacerbation relative to placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69 [95% CI, 0.63-0.77]) and time to first hospital-treated exacerbation (HR, 0.73 [0.59-0.90]). SGRQ score at Week 48 was 2.9 units lower with tiotropium (p < 0.0001). Adverse and serious adverse events were balanced across treatment groups and similar in profile to previous tiotropium trials. The rate ratio for a major adverse cardiovascular event during the treatment period + 30 days was 1.12 (0.67-1.86). By the end of planned treatment (Day 337) 52 patients on tiotropium (incidence rate per 100 years, 2.94) and 38 on placebo (2.13) had died (HR = 1.38 [0.91-2.10]; p = 0.13). Lung function, exacerbations and quality of life were improved by tiotropium 5 microg Respimat but a numerical imbalance was seen in all-cause mortality. The protocol is registered on the European Clinical Trials Database as trial number 2006-001009-27 and in the ClinicalTrials.gov database as NCT00387088. The aim of these studies was to compare the efficacy and the safety of tiotropium, delivered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI), a novel multi-dose, propellant-free inhaler, with ipratropium pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Two identical, 12-week, multi-national, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, active- and placebo-controlled studies were performed. COPD patients were randomized to treatment with either inhaled tiotropium (5 or 10 microg) via Respimat SMI administered once daily, ipratropium (36 microg) pMDI QID or placebo. The primary endpoint was the mean trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1)) response after 12 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included other spirometry measures and rescue medication use. A total of 719 patients were randomized; the majority were male (69%) with a mean pre-bronchodilator FEV(1) (% predicted) of 40.7%. The mean treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and placebo for the primary endpoint (mean trough FEV(1) response at week 12) were 0.118 and 0.149L, respectively (both P<0.0001). Treatment differences between tiotropium 5 and 10 microg and ipratropium were 0.064L (P=0.006) and 0.095L (P<0.0001). The increases in peak FEV(1), FEV(1) AUC((0-6h)) and FVC for both tiotropium doses were statistically superior to placebo (P<0.01) and higher than ipratropium. All active treatments significantly reduced the rescue medication use compared with placebo, but only tiotropium 10 microg was statistically superior to ipratropium (P=0.04). The incidence of adverse events was comparable across groups. In conclusion, tiotropium 5 and 10 microg daily, delivered via Respimat SMI, significantly improved lung function compared with ipratropium pMDI and placebo. A study was undertaken to record exacerbations and health resource use in patients with COPD during 6 months of treatment with tiotropium, salmeterol, or matching placebos.
                Patients with COPD were enrolled in two 6-month randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, double dummy studies of tiotropium 18 micro g once daily via HandiHaler or salmeterol 50 micro g twice daily via a metered dose inhaler. The two trials were combined for analysis of heath outcomes consisting of exacerbations, health resource use, dyspnoea (assessed by the transitional dyspnoea index, TDI), health related quality of life (assessed by St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, SGRQ), and spirometry.
                1207 patients participated in the study (tiotropium 402, salmeterol 405, placebo 400). Compared with placebo, tiotropium but not salmeterol was associated with a significant delay in the time to onset of the first exacerbation. Fewer COPD exacerbations/patient year occurred in the tiotropium group (1.07) than in the placebo group (1.49, p<0.05); the salmeterol group (1.23 events/year) did not differ from placebo. The tiotropium group had 0.10 hospital admissions per patient year for COPD exacerbations compared with 0.17 for salmeterol and 0.15 for placebo (not statistically different). For all causes (respiratory and non-respiratory) tiotropium, but not salmeterol, was associated with fewer hospital admissions while both groups had fewer days in hospital than the placebo group. The number of days during which patients were unable to perform their usual daily activities was lowest in the tiotropium group (tiotropium 8.3 (0.8), salmeterol 11.1 (0.8), placebo 10.9 (0.8), p<0.05). SGRQ total score improved by 4.2 (0.7), 2.8 (0.7) and 1.5 (0.7) units during the 6 month trial for the tiotropium, salmeterol and placebo groups, respectively (p<0.01 tiotropium v placebo). Compared with placebo, TDI focal score improved in both the tiotropium group (1.1 (0.3) units, p<0.001) and the salmeterol group (0.7 (0.3) units, p<0.05). Evaluation of morning pre-dose FEV(1), peak FEV(1) and mean FEV(1) (0-3 hours) showed that tiotropium was superior to salmeterol while both active drugs were more effective than placebo.
                Exacerbations of COPD and health resource usage were positively affected by daily treatment with tiotropium. With the exception of the number of hospital days associated with all causes, salmeterol twice daily resulted in no significant changes compared with placebo. Tiotropium also improved health related quality of life, dyspnoea, and lung function in patients with COPD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients experiencing frequent exacerbations demonstrate increased stable-state airway inflammation. Tiotropium has been shown to reduce exacerbation frequency, but its effect on airway inflammation is unknown. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of tiotropium on sputum inflammatory markers and exacerbation frequency. Patients (n = 142) were randomised to receive tiotropium or placebo in addition to their usual medication for 1 yr. Sputum and serum cytokines were assayed by ELISA and exacerbation frequency calculated using a symptom-based diary. There was no difference in the area under the curve for sputum interleukin (IL)-6 or myeloperoxidase between the groups, but sputum IL-8 level was increased in the tiotropium arm. There was no difference between start and end of study in serum IL-6 or C-reactive protein level. Tiotropium was associated with a 52% reduction in exacerbation frequency (1.17 versus 2.46 exacerbations.yr(-1)). Of patients on tiotropium, 43% experienced at least one exacerbation, compared with 64% on placebo. The total number of exacerbation days was reduced compared with placebo (17.3 versus 34.5 days). Tiotropium reduces exacerbation frequency in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, but this effect does not appear to be due to a reduction in airway or systemic inflammation. This study evaluated whether the effect of tiotropium on the change in trough forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV1), vs. placebo, is affected by smoking status. In a 3-month, double-blind study in 31 centres in Portugal, 311 (289 completed) patients were randomised to tiotropium 18 microg once daily or placebo. Baseline mean (standard deviation (SD)) FEV1 was 1.11 (0.39) l in the tiotropium group and 1.13 (0.39) l in the placebo group. Patients had an average smoking history of 55 (25.7) pack-years; 80 (26%) were smokers and 224 (74%) were ex-smokers. The primary end-point was change in morning pre-dose (i.e. trough) FEV1 after 12 weeks. Trough FEV1 at 12 weeks was significantly improved with tiotropium vs. placebo: the difference in means was 102 ml, P=0.0011, 95% confidence interval (CI) (41, 164). The difference in means in smokers was 138 ml, P=0.0105, CI (32, 244); in ex-smokers it was 66 ml, P=0.0375, CI (3, 129). The difference between smokers and ex-smokers was not statistically significant (P=0.6982) and may be due to greater variability and differences in disease severity. The significant improvement in lung function in patients treated with tiotropium vs. placebo in both smokers and ex-smokers suggests that tiotropium is an effective and well-tolerated therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), regardless of smoking status. Aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of inhaled Tiotropium bromide in COPD patients of different severities in pneumological practices during a three months clinical trial.
                A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study including COPD-patients (FEV1/FVC < 70 %, FEV1 < or = 70 % predicted; age > or = 40 years; > or = 10 pack years) of different severities was performed. The efficacy of 18 microg Tiotropium bromide once daily on lung function and exacerbations over 12 weeks was evaluated by respective pulmonary function tests (spirometry) before (trough value) and 2 hours after inhalation of study medication.
                1639 patients (1236 Tiotropium bromide, 403 placebo; FEV1 reversibility after 200 microg Ipratropium bromide + 200 microg Fenoterol: 7.9 +/- 7.5 % predicted [mean +/- sd]) were randomized. After 12 weeks of treatment Tiotropium bromide led to significant increases of trough FEV1 (23 - 24 h after last inhalation; + 79 +/- 17 ml), and 2 h after Tiotropium bromide inhalation (+ 128 +/- 19 ml) (all values vs. placebo, adjusted mean +/- se, p < 0.0001). FVC and IVC were also improved significantly. In mild COPD (FEV1 > or = 50 - 70 %) improvements were most pronounced (trough FEV1 + 113 +/- 29 ml, 2 h post-inhalation + 181 +/- 33 ml; all values vs. placebo., p < 0.0001). 14.6 % of patients treated with Tiotropium bromide had a COPD exacerbation vs. 19.9 % of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0151). The time to first exacerbation was prolonged (p = 0.0092 vs. placebo).
                Tiotropium bromide 18 microg once daily led to a persistent improvement of lung function and a reduction of exacerbations in patients with COPD of different severities. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) frequently develop exacerbations, leading to major clinical and health resource use ramifications.
                To prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a long-acting inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilator, tiotropium, in reducing COPD exacerbations and exacerbation-related health care utilization.
                Randomized, double-blind study.
                26 Veterans Affairs medical centers.
                1829 patients with moderate to severe COPD (mean baseline FEV(1), 36% predicted).
                Once-daily tiotropium (18 microg) or placebo for 6 months. Patients otherwise received usual care, except for other anticholinergic bronchodilators.
                The coprimary end points were the percentage of patients with a COPD exacerbation and the percentage of patients with a COPD-related hospitalization.
                Tiotropium significantly reduced the percentage of patients experiencing 1 or more exacerbations compared with placebo (27.9% vs. 32.3%, respectively; difference, -5.7 percentage points [95% CI, -10.4 to -1.0 percentage points]; P = 0.037). Fewer tiotropium patients were hospitalized because of COPD exacerbation (7.0% vs. 9.5%, respectively; difference, -3.0 percentage points [CI, -5.9 to -0.1 percentage points]; P = 0.056), although this difference was of borderline statistical significance. Analysis of secondary outcomes indicates that tiotropium may lengthen the time to first COPD exacerbation (P = 0.028) and reduce health care utilization for exacerbations, including the frequency of hospitalizations (P = 0.047), unscheduled clinic visits (P = 0.019), and days of antibiotic treatment (P = 0.015). Tiotropium did not statistically significantly reduce all-cause hospitalization rates.
                Trial participants were enrolled from 1 health care system, and 99% were men. The follow-up period extended for only 6 months.
                Tiotropium reduces COPD exacerbations and may reduce related health care utilization in patients with moderate to severe COPD. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma have different diagnostic criteria and treatment paradigms. Both are common and can occur in the same patient. We sought to determine the spirometric effects of tiotropium in COPD patients with concomitant asthma.
                A 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial with tiotropium 18 mcg daily was performed. Patients continued usual respiratory medications except for inhaled anticholinergics. Inclusion criteria: Physician diagnosis of COPD and asthma, age >or= 40 years, smoking >10 pack years, post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1s (FEV(1))<80% predicted, FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC)<70%, >or= 12%, and >or= 200 ml increase in FEV(1) following inhaled bronchodilator, treatment with inhaled steroids >or= 1 year. Spirometry was measured serially for 6h on days 1, 29 and 85.
                Four hundred and seventy-two patients were randomized. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Mean age=59.6 years, 61.4% were men, and FEV(1)=1.55l (53.0% predicted). Improvements at 12 weeks with tiotropium were observed for the primary endpoint FEV(1) area under the curve (AUC) from 0 to 6h (difference=186+/-24 ml, p<0.001) and for morning pre-dose FEV(1) (difference=98+/-23 ml, p<0.001). Significant differences in favor of tiotropium were observed for pre-dose FVC (difference=128+/-34 ml, p<0.001) and FVC AUC 0-6h (difference=232+/-35 ml, p<0.001). Compared to baseline, the mean weekly number of daily puffs of prn salbutamol was reduced by 0.05+/-0.12 puffs/day in the placebo group and by 0.50+/-0.12 puffs/day in the tiotropium group at week 12 (p<0.05).
                Patients with COPD and concomitant asthma achieve spirometric improvements with tiotropium along with symptomatic benefit as seen by reduced need for rescue medication. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who smoke have a greater annual rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) than those patients who have stopped smoking.
                To assess the effect of tiotropium on pre-dose (trough) FEV(1) in patients with COPD followed in Canada.
                A total of 913 patients were randomly assigned to receive either tiotropium 18 mug once daily (n=608) or placebo (usual care minus inhaled anticholinergics) (n=305) for 48 weeks in the present randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. The effect of tiotropium on measurements of lung function (FEV(1), FEV(6) and forced vital capacity), symptoms, health-related quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire) and exacerbations were examined.
                Tiotropium improved trough FEV(1) in both current and ex-smokers compared with placebo. Baseline FEV(1) in smokers and ex-smokers was 1.03 L and 0.93 L, respectively (P<0.001). At week 48, the mean difference between the tiotropium and placebo groups was 0.14+/-0.04 L (P<0.001) in the smoker group and 0.08+/-0.02 L (P<0.0001) in the ex-smoker group. Tiotropium also significantly improved trough forced vital capacity and FEV(6) compared with placebo throughout the treatment period (P<0.05, for all). Furthermore, tiotropium significantly improved the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score compared with placebo at week 48 (40.9 versus 43.7 units, P<0.005).
                Compared with the placebo group, tiotropium provides sustained improvements in lung function in patients with COPD, with improvements for smokers and ex-smokers. Clinical trials of tiotropium have principally recruited patients from secondary care with more severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and typically had included limitation of concomitant medication. In primary care, which is the most common setting for COPD management, many patients may have milder disease, and also may take a broad range of concomitant medication.
                This randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 12-week, 44-centre study investigated the efficacy (trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] response) and safety of additional treatment with once-daily tiotropium 18 mug via the HandiHaler in a primary care COPD population (tiotropium: N = 191, FEV1 = 1.25 L [47.91% predicted]; placebo: N = 183, FEV1 = 1.32 L [49.86% predicted]). Secondary endpoints included: trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response, weekly use of rescue short-acting beta-agonist, and exacerbation of COPD (complex of respiratory symptoms/events of >3 days in duration requiring a change in treatment). Treatment effects were determined using non-parametric analysis.
                At Week 12, median improvement in trough FEV1 response with tiotropium versus placebo was 0.06 L (p = 0.0102). The improvement was consistent across baseline treatment and COPD severity. Median improvement in FVC at 2, 6 and 12 weeks was 0.12 L (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with > or =1 exacerbation was reduced (tiotropium 9.5%; placebo 17.9%; p = 0.0147), independent of disease severity. Rescue medication usage was significantly reduced in the tiotropium group compared with placebo. Adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies.
                Tiotropium provides additional benefits to usual primary care management in a representative COPD population.
                The identifier is: NCT00274079. To examine electrocardiographic findings after short- and long-term tiotropium therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and to establish previously reported symptomatic efficacy.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
                Twelve outpatient investigational centers in the United States.
                One hundred ninety-six patients with COPD.
                Patients received either tiotropium 18 mug once/day or placebo, delivered by the HandiHaler device.
                Electrocardiography (predose and 5 min postdose) and 24-hour Holter monitoring were performed at baseline and after 8 and 12 weeks of treatment with tiotropium 18 microg once/day or placebo. Efficacy measures (spirometry, global COPD ratings, scores on the EuroQol Health Questionnaire [EQ-5D], albuterol inhaler as needed) were included to demonstrate that the study population exhibited the characteristic improvements observed in previous tiotropium studies. Mean baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 1.03 L. Mean changes in heart rate from baseline were similar in both groups. No differences were noted in the percentage of patients developing rhythm or conduction abnormalities detected with electrocardiography or Holter monitoring. Frequency of premature beats and mean maximal changes in PR, QRS, QT, QTcB, and QTcF intervals were similar in both groups. No patients developed new-onset QT or QTc intervals greater than 500 msec, and no differences were noted in the percentage of patients developing new QT prolongation less than 30 msec, 30-60 msec, or greater than 60 msec. At 12 weeks, predose and postdose improvements in FEV1 were 184 and 265 ml, respectively, with tiotropium versus placebo (p<0.001). Physician and patient global COPD ratings and the EQ-5D visual analog scale scores were improved with tiotropium (p<0.05); as-needed albuterol was reduced by 25% relative to placebo (p<0.05).
                Tiotropium provided spirometric and symptomatic benefits in patients with COPD and was not associated with evidence of electrocardiographic changes in heart rate, rhythm, QT intervals, or conduction. Physical activity status is increasingly recognized as a reliable predictor of mortality and hospitalization in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The reduction in physical activity occurs earlier in the clinical course of COPD than previously appreciated, possibly arising from breathlessness, reduced exercise tolerance, and adoption of a more sedentary lifestyle. To date, no clinical trial has evaluated the impact of pharmacotherapy on both lung function and physical activity. We recently designed a study that evaluates the impact of tiotropium (a once-daily inhaled anticholinergic) on lung function and physical activity in a maintenance/treatment-naïve Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage II COPD cohort. Previous studies have demonstrated that tiotropium improves lung function and exercise tolerance; whether these benefits translate into improvements in physical activity is the focus of the current work. Here we describe the rationale and challenges in developing and implementing this study and review its unique features and novel design, including: utility of direct activity monitoring in multicenter clinical trials; importance of behavioral-modification techniques (including motivational interviewing to improve patient self-efficacy and adherence for a healthy, more active lifestyle); utility of individualized activity plans that provide an integrated approach with pharmacotherapy and behavioral modification to help patients achieve a more active lifestyle. This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 1-yr study compared the effect of tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n=500) and placebo (n=510) on exacerbations, associated health resource use (HRU) and airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The mean+/-sd number of exacerbations during the past year was 2.14+/-1.40, the mean weekly morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 259.6+/-96.1 L.min-1 and the mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 1.37+/-0.45 L. Tiotropium significantly delayed the time to first exacerbation by approximately 100 days, reduced the proportion of patients experiencing more than one exacerbation by 17%, and decreased the number of exacerbations by 35% and exacerbation days by 37% versus placebo. Tiotropium also decreased HRU versus placebo, as indicated by the significant reductions in the use of concomitant respiratory medications, antibiotics and oral steroids, and the number of unscheduled physician contacts. Mean weekly morning PEF improved significantly with tiotropium versus placebo from week 1 until the end of the study. At the end of the study, tiotropium significantly improved trough (pre-dose) FEV1, forced vital capacity, slow vital capacity and inspiratory capacity versus placebo. In conclusion, tiotropium reduced exacerbations and associated health resource use, and improved airflow over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Because treadmill exercise testing is more representative of daily activity than cycle testing, we developed treadmill protocols to be used in various clinical settings as part of a two-year, multicenter, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) trial evaluating the effect of tiotropium on exercise.
                We enrolled 519 COPD patients aged 64.6 ± 8.3 years with a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV(1)) of 1.25 ± 0.42 L, 44.3% ± 11.9% predicted. The patients performed symptom-limited treadmill tests where work rate (Ẇ) was increased linearly using speed and grade adjustments every minute. On two subsequent visits, they performed constant Ẇ tests to exhaustion at 90% of maximum Ẇ from the incremental test.
                Mean incremental test duration was 522 ± 172 seconds (range 20-890), maximum work rate 66 ± 34 watts. For the first and second constant Ẇ tests, both at 61 ± 33 watts, mean endurance times were 317 ± 61 seconds and 341 ± 184 seconds, respectively. The mean of two tests had an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.85 (P < 0.001). During the second constant Ẇ test, 88.2% of subjects stopped exercise because of breathing discomfort; 87.1% for Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Stage II, 88.5% for GOLD Stage III, and 90.2% for GOLD Stage IV.
                The symptom-limited incremental and constant work treadmill protocol was well tolerated and appeared to be representative of the physiologic limitations of COPD.
This review shows that tiotropium treatment was associated with a significant improvement in patients' quality of life and it reduced the risk of exacerbations, with a number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) of 16 to prevent one exacerbation. Tiotropium also reduced exacerbations leading to hospitalisation but no significant difference was found for hospitalisation of any cause or mortality. Thus, tiotropium appears to be a reasonable choice for the management of patients with stable COPD, as proposed in guidelines. The review however, shows that tiotropium delivered via the Respimat soft mist inhaler was associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality compared with placebo, which calls for caution with this device whilst awaiting the results of an ongoing head-to-head trial comparing tiotropium delivery devices and doses.