The additive analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen, 1000 mg, and codeine, 60 mg, in dental pain. Evaluation of flurbiprofen, acetaminophen, an acetaminophen-codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain. Double-blind comparison of meclofenamate sodium with acetaminophen, acetaminophen with codeine and placebo for relief of postsurgical dental pain. Efficacy and quality of ibuprofen and acetaminophen plus codeine analgesia. An appraisal of codeine as an analgesic: single-dose analysis. The relative efficacy of indoprofen compared with opioid-analgesic combinations. Comparative study of flurbiprofen, zomepirac sodium, acetaminophen plus codeine, and acetaminophen for the relief of postsurgical dental pain. Analysis of the analgesic efficacy of acetaminophen 1000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, and the combination of acetaminophen 1000 mg and codeine phosphate 60 mg in the relief of postoperative pain. Double-blind parallel comparison of ketoprofen (Orudis), acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo in postoperative pain. Evaluation of ketorolac, aspirin, and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib compared with codeine/acetaminophen using a model of acute dental pain. Evaluation of ketorolac, ibuprofen, acetaminophen, and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Rofecoxib versus codeine/acetaminophen in postoperative dental pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active comparator-controlled clinical trial. Efficacy of low dose combination analgesics: acetaminophen/codeine, aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine, and placebo in oral surgery pain. Lack of analgesic effect of 50 and 100 mg oral tramadol after orthopaedic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo and standard active drug comparison. Evaluation of two opioid-acetaminophen combinations and placebo in postoperative oral surgery pain. Combining diclofenac with acetaminophen or acetaminophen-codeine after oral surgery: a randomized, double-blind single-dose study. Single-dose vicoprofen compared with acetaminophen with codeine and placebo in patients with acute postoperative pain after third molar extractions. A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the analgesic effect of etoricoxib to placebo, naproxen sodium, and acetaminophen with codeine using the dental impaction pain model. The analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen compared to acetaminophen with codeine. Additive analgesic effect of codeine and paracetamol can be detected in strong, but not moderate, pain after Caesarean section. Baseline pain-intensity is a determinant of assay-sensitivity in a postoperative analgesic trial. Analgesic efficacy of the kappa-receptor agonist, enadoline, in dental surgery pain. A 12-hour evaluation of the analgesic efficacy of diflunisal, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen-codeine combination, and placebo in postoperative pain. Tramadol/acetaminophen tablets in the treatment of postsurgical orthopedic pain. Combination tramadol plus acetaminophen for postsurgical pain. Analgesic effect of an aspirin-codeine-butalbital-caffeine combination and an acetaminophen-codeine combination in postoperative oral surgery pain. Analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen in comparison with acetaminophen, acetaminophen plus codeine, and placebo after impacted third molar removal. Diflunisal. A new oral analgesic with an unusually long duration of action.
In a double-blind, randomized, single-dose trial the analgesic contribution of acetaminophen, 1000 mg, and codeine, 60 mg, was determined. The study was a 2 X 2 factorial experiment in which 120 patients suffering from pain as a result of oral surgery rated their pain intensity and pain relief for up to 5 hours after a single dose of one of: 1000 mg acetaminophen, 60 mg codeine, 1000 mg acetaminophen plus 60 mg codeine, or placebo. The factorial analysis showed that both 1000 mg acetaminophen and 60 mg codeine made a statistically significant (P less than 0.05) contribution to the analgesic effectiveness of the combination on all measures of efficacy (sum of pain intensity differences, largest pain intensity difference, total pain relief, largest pain relief, and time to remedication). The incidence of adverse effects did not appear to differ among the treatments, including placebo. Eighty-eight outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single, oral dose of flurbiprofen 100 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg with codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medicating. Estimates of sum of pain intensity differences, peak pain intensity differences, total relief, peak relief, and hours of 50% relief were derived from these subjective reports. Flurbiprofen and the acetaminophen-codeine combination were significantly superior to placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia and significantly superior to acetaminophen alone for most measures of efficacy. Based on the 12-hour data, acetaminophen alone did not differ significantly from placebo; however, it was superior to placebo for measures of total effect based on the 4-hour data. Flurbiprofen was significantly superior to the acetaminophen codeine combination with respect to the number of hours until remedication. All medications had manifested an effect by hour 1; analgesia persisted for 12 hours for flurbiprofen, 6 hours for acetaminophen-codeine, and 3 hours for acetaminophen alone. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications. nan Ibuprofen, 400 mg, was compared with 300 mg acetaminophen plus 30 mg of codeine and placebo in 120 post-orthopedic surgery patients with moderate to severe pain. The study was designed as a double-blind, single-dose, parallel-group analgesic efficacy assay. Estimates of analgesia were obtained up to 6 h using categorical and visual analog measures of pain intensity and pain relief. Estimates of selected elements of mood and of sensory and affective components of pain were obtained at 0 and 2 h using contrasting mood word/phrase pairs and a portion of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, respectively. Drugs were distinguishable from placebo in total analgesic effect, and ibuprofen was more effective than acetaminophen plus codeine, especially in terms of duration. While peak effects were comparable, they occurred 1 h later following ibuprofen. Differences among treatments were more discernible using visual analog measures. Side effects were minimal. Ibuprofen provided greater improvement in selected elements of mood than acetaminophen plus codeine at comparable levels of pain relief. While decreases in the sensory component of pain were most highly associated with pain relief provided by ibuprofen, decreases in the affective component were most highly associated with pain relief following acetaminophen plus codeine. These latter results indicate that mood assessment and the discrimination between sensory and affective components of pain could be particularly useful within analgesic drug assays, especially when comparing analgesics of differing pharmacologic class and when comparing the results of such assays in pain syndromes characterized by differing pain quality. Codeine, a relatively weak oral narcotic agent, is the most frequently prescribed oral opiate drug. It is also frequently utilized as a control drug in comparative analgesic efficacy studies. These studies are often single dose analysis of pain relief following surgery or childbirth. We conducted a single dose, post-operative analysis of 116 patients who were randomly assigned to receive codeine 60 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, the combination of codeine and acetaminophen at these doses, or a placebo. Only the combination agent was uniformly superior to placebo. Codeine 60 mg was not consistently superior to placebo in this post-operative single dose analysis. A review of the literature confirms the difficulty in unequivocally establishing the value of codeine as an analgesic, in acceptable oral doses, in the single dose setting. Previous reports, however, suggest that the multiple doses of codeine may afford adequate analgesia. Interpretation of single dose studies with extrapolation to repeated dosing in the practice setting is difficult. This double-blind, parallel-design study used postsurgical dental outpatients as subjects. The patients self-administered a single dose of one of the study medications when they estimated their pain to be of moderate or severe intensity. The study medications were 200 mg of indoprofen, 650 mg of acetaminophen, 650 of acetaminophen with 60 mg of codeine, 650 mg of acetaminophen with 100 mg of d-propoxyphene N, and a placebo. On a report form, data were recorded on baseline pain and then hourly for four hours, intensity of pain, relief of pain, and side effects were reported. Also, an overall evaluation was recorded. Data were analyzed with the use of analysis of variance and Duncan's Multiple Range test. All four active treatments were statistically superior to placebo for sum pain intensity difference, total relief of pain, and overall evaluation parameters. Both opioid-analgesic combinations showed small additive effects over acetaminophen alone, and indoprofen was superior to both combination treatments and acetaminophen alone. The relative analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of 50 and 100 mg of flurbiprofen (Ansaid, Upjohn) were compared with 100 mg of zomepirac sodium, 650 mg of acetaminophen plus 60 mg of codeine, 650 mg of acetaminophen alone, and placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. A total of 182 patients entered the study with moderate pain from a third molar extraction and were evaluated for six hours. For many efficacy variables, all active treatments were significantly (p less than or equal to 0.05) more effective than placebo. The two doses of flurbiprofen gave approximately similar results, suggesting a plateau effect above 50 mg. With the exception of relief at one hour, there were no significant differences between zomepirac and either dose of flurbiprofen. However, the mean response with zomepirac was greater than with either 50 or 100 mg of flurbiprofen during the first four hours and lower during the last two hours. The analgesic effects of acetaminophen alone were not significantly different from acetaminophen in combination with codeine. At the first hour, acetaminophen plus codeine led to significantly better pain relief than did 100 mg of flurbiprofen. After the first hour, flurbiprofen resulted in greater mean scores than acetaminophen alone or acetaminophen plus codeine, and these differences were significant at the fifth and sixth hours. Five patients had adverse reactions while receiving acetaminophen, acetaminophen plus codeine, or placebo. There were no adverse effects with flurbiprofen or zomepirac. Patients who experienced pain after surgery were administered a single dose of 1 of 3 treatments: acetaminophen 1000 mg, codeine phosphate 60 mg, or a combination of these. Patients rated their pain intensity on ordinal and visual analog scales just prior to medication and at intervals thereafter for up to 5 hours. They also rated pain relief, pain half gone, and any adverse effects. Sum of pain intensity difference and total pain relief scores were analyzed using Dunnett's procedure. The drug combination was statistically superior to codeine as measured by SPID, TOTPAR, pain half gone, and time to remedication. The combination achieved better mean scores than acetaminophen on all efficacy measures, but was (marginally) statistically superior only in pain half gone. No appreciable differences in adverse effects were noted among the treatments. The difficulty of showing the analgesic efficacy of codeine in a single dose trial is discussed. One hundred sixty-one patients with postoperative pain were treated at a single center in a double-blind, randomized, parallel study designed to compare the efficacy and safety of single oral doses of ketoprofen (50 and 150 mg), an acetaminophen (650 mg) plus codeine (60 mg) combination, and placebo. From 1 through 4 hours after administration of the study drugs, the mean summed pain intensity difference (SPID) and time-weighted total pain relief (TOPAR) scores for the three active treatments generally were significantly (P less than 0.05) higher than those for placebo but not significantly different from each other. At the 6-hour evaluation, the ketoprofen groups, but not the acetaminophen-codeine group, had higher (P less than 0.05) mean SPID and TOPAR scores than the placebo group, as a result of a shorter duration of pain relief in the acetaminophen-codeine group. The 6-hour TOPAR scores were significantly (P less than 0.05) higher for both ketoprofen groups than for the acetaminophen-codeine group; the ketoprofen 150 mg group also had significantly (P less than 0.05) higher mean 6-hour SPID and global subjective assessment scores. As a result of a higher frequency of somnolence, there was a significantly (P less than 0.05) greater incidence of central nervous system adverse drug reactions among patients treated with acetaminophen plus codeine than among those treated with 150 mg of ketoprofen. These results indicate that the analgesic efficacy of both 50 and 150 mg doses of ketoprofen equals that of acetaminophen 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg and the duration of the analgesic effect of ketoprofen is significantly longer. One-hundred twenty-eight outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 mg, aspirin 650 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. The acetaminophen-codeine combination was significantly superior to aspirin for peak analgesia. Ketorolac was significantly superior to aspirin for every measure of total and peak analgesia, and significantly superior to acetaminophen-codeine for measures of total effect. The analgesic effect of ketorolac was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 6 hours. Repeat-dose data also suggested that ketorolac 10 mg was superior to aspirin 650 mg and acetaminophen-codeine on the day of surgery. Differences among the active medications were trivial for the postoperative days 1-6 analyses. The frequency of adverse effects was over 4 times greater for acetaminophen-codeine than for ketorolac or aspirin. To determine analgesic efficacy of a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg compared with acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-comparator-controlled, parallel-group study.
                Patients (N = 390) experiencing moderate or severe pain postextraction of 2 or more third molars, with at least 1 mandibular impaction, were randomized to placebo (n = 30), rofecoxib (n = 180), or codeine/acetaminophen 60/600 mg (n = 180). Time to confirmed perceptible pain relief, and patient evaluations of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessments were recorded.
                For total pain relief over 6 hours (primary end point), rofecoxib was superior to codeine/acetaminophen (15.5 vs 10.7; P < .001). Rofecoxib was statistically significantly superior to codeine/acetaminophen with respect to TOPAR4, patient global assessment, peak pain relief, and duration of analgesic effect. Median onset of analgesia was similar for both drugs. The codeine/acetaminophen group had more patients with 1 or more adverse events.
                Rofecoxib provided superior analgesic efficacy compared with codeine/acetaminophen with fewer gastrointestinal and nervous system adverse events. Two-hundred six outpatients with postoperative pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly assigned on a double-blind basis to receive oral doses of ketorolac tromethamine 10 and 20 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg, acetaminophen 600 mg, a combination of acetaminophen 600 mg plus codeine 60 mg, or placebo. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief hourly for 6 hours after medicating. All active medications were significantly superior to placebo. Analgesia was similar for ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg; however, these treatments were superior to acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination. The analgesic effect of each active medication was significant by hour 1 and persisted for 5-6 hours. The data suggest a plateau in ketorolac's analgesic efficacy at the 10-mg level. Repeat-dose data indicated that on the day of surgery ketorolac 10 and 20 mg and ibuprofen 400 mg were superior to acetaminophen 600 mg; ketorolac 20 mg was also superior to acetaminophen-codeine. Differences among active medications were not significant when data for the entire postoperative period (days 0-6) were evaluated. The frequency of adverse effects was similar for the active medications. In recent studies of acute pain and primary dysmenorrhea, rofecoxib, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that selectively targets the cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme, was found to be similar in efficacy to ibuprofen and naproxen sodium.
                The purpose of this study was to determine the analgesic efficacy of a single oral dose of rofecoxib 50 mg compared with the combination of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg in a model of postsurgical dental pain.
                In this double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, parallel-group study, patients experiencing moderate or severe pain after the surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars, at least 1 of which was a mandibular impaction, were randomized to receive placebo, rofecoxib 50 mg, or codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg. Patient evaluations of pain intensity, pain relief, and global assessments were recorded throughout the 24-hour period after dosing. The 2-stopwatch method was used to determine time to confirmed perceptible pain relief. The primary end point assessing overall analgesic effect was total pain relief over 6 hours (TOPAR6). Secondary end points were patient global assessment of response to therapy (PGART) at 6 hours, onset of analgesia, peak analgesic effect, and duration of analgesia.
                A total of 393 patients were enrolled; 182 received rofecoxib, 180 received codeine/acetaminophen, and 31 received placebo. The overall analgesic effect of rofecoxib 50 mg was greater than that of codeine 60 mg/acetaminophen 600 mg for TOPAR6 (12.4 vs 7.0; P < 0.001) and PGART at 6 hours (P < 0.001). The onset of analgesic effect was similar for rofecoxib and codeine/acetaminophen. Peak analgesic effect as measured by peak pain relief scores during the first 6 hours was significantly greater in the rofecoxib group compared with the codeine/acetaminophen group (P < 0.001), as was the duration of analgesic effect measured by the time to rescue analgesia (9.6 hours vs 2.3 hours, P < 0.001). Adverse events were reported in 33.0%, 46.1%, and 32.3% of patients treated with rofecoxib, codeine/acetaminophen, and placebo, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea (6.0%, 25.0%, and 9.7%, respectively) and vomiting (3.8%, 18.3%, and 6.5%, respectively). Significantly more patients in the codeine/acetaminophen group than in the rofecoxib group experienced adverse events overall (P < 0.050) and nausea in particular (P < 0.001).
                In this study of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain, the analgesic efficacy of rofecoxib 50 mg was greater than that of codeine/acetaminophen, with a lower incidence of adverse events and nausea. A double-blind, randomized, single-dose study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of two commonly prescribed combination analgesic products to placebo. The combinations were acetaminophen 300 mg/codeine 30 mg(†), and aspirin 325 mg/butalbital 50 mg/caffeine 40 mg/codeine 30 mg(††). One hundred twenty-three (123) oral surgery outpatients took study medications when their pain became moderate to severe and recorded the levels of pain intensity, pain relief, anxiety and relaxation at 30 minutes and hourly for 6 hours after dosing. Remedication was permitted if study medications did not provide adequate pain relief. Time to remedication, and the number of observations with 50% or better relief, were noted as were any side effects. An overall evaluation was obtained from each patient. Results of the study showed that the aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was significantly more effective than placebo for total pain relief, peak relief and global evaluation. While the acetaminophen/codeine combination was numerically superior to placebo, it achieved statistical significance only for global evaluation. The aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was numerically superior to acetaminophen/codeine for every measure of analgesic efficacy but the differences did not achieve statistical significance. Both active treatment groups experienced significantly less total anxiety than did the placebo group. Only 11 patients reported mild, transient adverse effects; the most common was drowsiness. The adverse effects occurred equally among the three treatment groups. In this study, the aspirin/butalbital/caffeine/codeine combination was significantly superior to placebo and somewhat better than acetaminophen/codeine. Tramadol hydrochloride is a synthetic mu-opioid agonist with additional monoaminergic activity. Tramadol's analgesic effect has been equated with that of pethidine, with a more favourable side-effect profile. Tramadol has been the most-selling prescription analgesic in Germany for several years, and it is now available in many other European countries, but still there is a lack of adequately controlled clinical studies of its analgesic properties. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of 50 and 100 mg oral tramadol with our standard analgesic for postoperative pain treatment, 1000 mg paracetamol + 60 mg codeine, and placebo. A single-dose, parallel group, double-blind design was used. One hundred forty-four patients were enrolled the day after total hip replacement if they had a pain intensity of 60 mm or more on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale. Treatments were compared on the basis of pain intensity and derived variables (pain intensity difference, and summed pain intensity differences), the need of rescue medication, and a global evaluation. Serum concentrations confirmed rapid and good absorption comparable with that reported in healthy volunteers. The active drug control, paracetamol+codeine, was significantly superior to placebo for all efficacy variable (P = 0.0002-0.004), confirming good assay sensitivity. Paracetamol+codeine was also significantly superior to both 50 mg tramadol (P = 0.002-0.03) and 100 mg tramadol (P = 0.002-0.02). There was no difference between placebo and 50 and 100 mg tramadol for any of the efficacy variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To determine the relative analgesic potency and adverse effect liability of hydrocodone bitartrate 7.5 mg with acetaminophen 500 mg, codeine phosphate 30 mg with acetaminophen 300 mg, and placebo in the treatment of pain following oral surgery.
                Randomized, double-blind, single-dose, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study with self-ratings at 30 minutes and then at hourly intervals from hour 1 to hour 6.
                Private, oral surgery practice sites.
                Three hundred twenty-four outpatients with moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars were selected. One was lost to follow-up and 32 did not need an analgesic; 232 patients had valid efficacy data.
                Patients were treated with a single oral dose of hydrocodone bitartrate 7.5 mg with acetaminophen 500 mg, codeine phosphate 30 mg with acetaminophen 300 mg, or placebo when they experienced steady, moderate or severe pain that, in their opinion, required an analgesic. Using a self-rating record, subjects rated their pain and its relief for 6 hours after medicating; estimates of peak and total analgesia were derived from these subjective reports.
                This study was a valid analgesic assay. Both active treatments were significantly superior to placebo for all measures of analgesic efficacy. The hydrocodone-acetaminophen combination was significantly superior to the codeine-acetaminophen combination for total pain relief and the number of evaluations with 50% relief. Both active treatments manifested an analgesic effect within 30 minutes; the effect persisted for 5 hours for the codeine combination and 6 hours for the hydrocodone combination. Adverse effects were transient, consistent with the pharmacologic profiles of opioids, and none required treatment.
                A slight advantage in analgesic efficacy was demonstrated in this single-dose study for the hydrocodone-acetaminophen combination. Repeat-dose studies, however, should be conducted to determine the clinical significance of the difference in analgesic effect of these opioid combinations. In a randomized double-blind study, 120 patients with moderate to strong pain after surgical removal of wisdom teeth were given the following in single oral doses: 100-mg enteric-coated diclofenac tablets; 1 g acetaminophen (INN, paracetamol); 1 g acetaminophen plus 60 mg codeine; 100-mg enteric-coated diclofenac tablets plus 1 g acetaminophen; or 100-mg enteric-coated diclofenac tablets plus 1 g acetaminophen plus 60 mg codeine. Patients recorded pain intensity and pain relief for 8 hours. Upside assay sensitivity was confirmed because acetaminophen plus codeine was superior to acetaminophen. Diclofenac plus acetaminophen with and without codeine had superior analgesic effect compared with diclofenac, acetaminophen, or acetaminophen plus codeine. Addition of 60 mg codeine increased the degree of side effects. These results support the clinical practice of combining diclofenac with acetaminophen for acute pain. Of clinical importance are superior and prolonged analgesia and fewer side effects after enteric-coated diclofenac tablets plus acetaminophen compared with acetaminophen plus codeine. The purpose of this double-blind, randomized study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of the following medications: 2 tablets of Vicoprofen (ibuprofen 200 mg/hydrocodone 7.5 mg; Knoll Pharmaceutical Co, Mount Olive, NJ), 2 tablets ofp6 acetaminophen with codeine phosphate (acetaminophen 300 mg/codeine 30 mg), and 2 tablets of placebo in the management of moderate to severe postoperative dental pain after surgical extraction of at least one impacted mandibular third molar.
                One hundred twenty-five patients (75 women, 50 men) participated in the study. The time of first perceptible pain relief and meaningful pain relief were measured using a stopwatch technique. Pain intensity and pain relief scores were recorded using standard verbal descriptors at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 hours after dosing. At the conclusion of the study, patients completed a global evaluation for the effectiveness of the study medication.
                Both active treatments were superior to placebo for all analgesic measures. Pain relief scores were significantly better for Vicoprofen than placebo throughout the study and significantly better than for acetaminophen with codeine from 2 through 8 hours after dosing. The duration of analgesia (time to remedication) was significantly longer for Vicoprofen (median, 5.50 hours) compared with acetaminophen with codeine (median, 3.03 hours) and placebo (median, 1.00 hours). Mean global evaluation for Vicoprofen was significantly better than for placebo and acetaminophen with codeine. Overall, there were no significant differences in the adverse event profile among the 3 treatment groups.
                Vicoprofen was found to be an effective postoperative analgesic medication in the management of acute postoperative dental pain. Its total analgesic effect, duration of analgesia, and global evaluation were superior to acetaminophen with codeine and placebo in this study model. To compare the overall analgesic effect, including time to onset, peak and duration of effect for etoricoxib 120 mg, a new COX-2 selective inhibitor, in patients with acute pain to that of placebo. Naproxen sodium 550 mg and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg were the active comparators.
                A total of 201 patients with moderate to severe pain following surgical extraction of > or = 2 third molars, of which at least the mandibular tooth was impacted, were randomly allocated to receive single oral doses of placebo (n = 50), etoricoxib 120 mg (n = 50), naproxen sodium 550 mg (n = 51), or acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (n = 50). The endpoints included total pain relief over 8 hours (TOPAR8, primary end point), sum of pain intensity difference over 8 hours, patient's global evaluation, onset, peak, and duration of analgesia.
                Etoricoxib 120 mg had a significantly greater least squares (LS) mean TOPAR8 score than placebo (20.9 vs 5.4; P < 0.001) and acetaminophen/codeine 600/60 mg (20.9 vs 11.5; P < 0.001), and a similar LS mean TOPAR8 score to naproxen sodium 550 mg (20.9 vs 21.3). All three active treatments had rapid onset of analgesia, median time approximately 30 minutes. The duration of analgesic effect, defined as median time to rescue medication use, was >24 hours for etoricoxib, 20.8 hours for naproxen sodium, 3.6 hours for acetaminophen/codeine, and 1.6 hours for placebo.
                Etoricoxib is a new COX-2 selective inhibitor under development for treatment of osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and acute pain. In this study, etoricoxib 120 mg provided rapid and long-lasting pain relief to patients with moderate-to-severe postdental surgery pain. Etoricoxib was generally well tolerated. In a single-dose, parallel group, randomized block treatment allocation study, the relative analgesic efficacy of flurbiprofen, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug, was compared to acetaminophen 650 mg with codeine 60 mg, zomepirac sodium 100 mg, and placebo. A total of 226 post-surgical dental patients (146 females and 80 males) participated in the study. Flurbiprofen in 50 mg and 100 mg dosages demonstrated effective analgesic activity with the 100 mg dosage being at least as effective as the acetaminophen/codeine combination. The results of this study support previous work on flurbiprofen. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single oral dose study was done in order to examine whether codeine has an additive analgesic effect to that of paracetamol for moderate and strong postoperative pain after abdominal surgery. The maximum recommended single dose of paracetamol 1000 mg (Paracet) was compared with a combination of a submaximal dose of paracetamol 800 mg plus codeine 60 mg (Paralgin forte) and placebo for pain relief after Caesarean section in 125 patients.
                Visual analogue pain intensity score (VAS 0-100 mm) and categorical pain relief score were recorded for 6 hours after the study drug intake. The main efficacy variables analyzed were: pain intensity difference and summed pain intensity differences during the first 3 and 6 h after study drug intake, total pain relief during the first 3 and 6 h, global evaluation score at the end of the observation period, and time to rescue analgesic.
                Because of protocol violations, 17 patients were excluded from the analysis of effects. Among the 108 patients included in the analysis of analgesic effect, 49 patients had moderate baseline pain (VAS between 40 and 60 mm on a 100 mm scale), and 59 patients had strong baseline pain (VAS more than 60 mm). In patients with strong baseline pain, statistically highly significant differences were documented in efficacy variables between the active drugs and placebo and between the two active drugs. However, in patients with moderate baseline pain, no differences were found between the study drugs in any of the analgesic efficacy variables.
                This study thus confirms that codeine has additive analgesic effect to paracetamol in pain after surgery. Our results show the importance of initial pain intensity in postoperative assessment of analgesic drugs. Assay-sensitivity and test power are increased by selecting patients with sufficiently high initial pain intensity and by comparing groups of patients with identical surgery and similar demographic variables. To study the analgesic efficacy of enadoline, a selective agonist of the kappa-opioid receptor, a double-blind, randomized comparison was made of enadoline versus placebo and a combination of acetaminophen-codeine in patients with pain after surgical extraction of impacted molar teeth. An initial study involving a comparison of enadoline, a combination, and placebo failed to show any analgesic effect of enadoline. Therefore, a second study with the same design but using higher doses of enadoline was conducted. Despite continued safety and tolerability even at the higher doses, enadoline could not be shown to be superior to placebo. The acetaminophen-codeine combination was significantly more effective than enadoline or placebo. Enadoline did not show analgesic efficacy in this study. Possible reasons for this lack of efficacy are discussed. The analgesic efficacy of single 500 and 1,000 mg doses of diflunisal, a new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with acetaminophen 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen 600 mg with codeine 60 mg, and placebo in 132 inpatients with postoperative pain. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for up to 12 hours after medication. Diflunisal 500 and 1,000 mg were significantly superior to placebo for every measure of total and peak analgesia, and a significant analgesic effect persisted for 8 hours. Acetaminophen alone and the acetaminophen-codeine combination were significantly superior to placebo for most measures of analgesia, and their effects were significant for 4 and 5 hours respectively. Differences among the active medications were not statistically significant for measures of total or peak analgesia. Tramadol/acetaminophen (APAP) combination tablets were shown effective and safe for postsurgical orthopedic pain in a 6-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled study. Of 305 intent-to-treat (ITT) postsurgical patients, 153 patients undergoing arthroscopy who had at least moderate pain were randomized to receive either tramadol 37.5 mg/APAP 325 mg (mean, 4.3 tablets), or codeine 30 mg/APAP 300 mg (mean, 4.6 tablets), or placebo. Tramadol/APAP was superior to placebo for the following outcome variables: total pain relief (TOTPAR, P = .013), sum of pain intensity differences (SPID, P = .049), sum of total pain relief and sum of pain intensity differences (SPRID, P = .018), and average daily pain relief (P = .031). Similar incidence of adverse events for tramadol/APAP and codeine/APAP was found, except for constipation (0% vs 10.9%) and vomiting (8.2% vs 16.4%). This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active- and placebo-controlled trial evaluated tramadol plus acetaminophen (APAP) for orthopedic (n = 153) and abdominal (n = 152) postsurgical pain.
                Patients with moderate pain or greater were randomized to an initial two tablets of 37.5 mg tramadol plus 325 mg APAP (n = 98), codeine 30 mg plus APAP 300 mg (n = 109), or placebo (n = 98); thereafter, they received 1 to 2 tablets every 4 to 6 hours as needed for pain for 6 days. Outcome measures were pain relief and pain intensity, total pain relief, sum of pain intensity differences, and sum of pain relief and pain intensity differences during 4 hours and the daily averages.
                Tramadol plus APAP was superior to placebo for total pain relief, sum of pain intensity differences, and sum of pain relief and pain intensity differences (P < or =0.015); tramadol plus APAP and codeine plus APAP did not separate (P > or=0.281). For average daily pain relief, average daily pain intensity, and overall medication assessment, tramadol plus APAP was superior to placebo (P < or =0.038); codeine plus APAP did not separate from placebo (P > or =0.125). Discontinuation because of adverse events occurred in 8.2% of tramadol plus APAP, 10.1% of codeine plus APAP, and 3.0% of placebo patients. Except for constipation (4.1% tramadol plus APAP vs 10.1% codeine plus APAP) and vomiting (9.2% vs 14.7%, respectively), adverse events were similar for active treatments.
                Tramadol plus APAP (mean dose 4.4 tablets) was effective and well tolerated for postsurgical pain and showed better tolerability than did codeine plus APAP. The efficacy of an aspirin-caffeine-codeine-butalbital combination was compared to an acetaminophen-codeine combination and placebo in outpatients who had moderate or severe pain after the surgical removal of impacted third molars. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain, relief, anxiety and relaxation hourly for up to 6 hours after medicating. Each active medication was significantly superior to placebo for measures of analgesia and relaxation. Although the butalbital-containing combination provided consistently greater analgesia, the differences between active medications were not statistically significant. The acetaminophen-codeine combination significantly reduced anxiety; however, the butalbital containing combination did not. The results of this study suggest that female patients may have greater efficacy than male patients. All adverse effects were transitory and consistent with the known pharmacologic profiles of the study medications or the backup analgesic. The analgesic efficacy of 50 and 100 mg flurbiprofen was compared with acetaminophen 650 mg, acetaminophen 650 mg plus codeine 60 mg, and placebo.
                Subjects undergoing the surgical removal of impacted third molars were randomly administered one of the five treatments after the onset of moderate to severe postoperative pain. Pain intensity, pain relief, and side effects were evaluated for 6 hours after drug administration.
                Both doses of flurbiprofen resulted in significant analgesia in comparison with placebo, acetaminophen, and acetaminophen plus codeine as measured by pain intensity difference, pain relief, and global evaluation. The greatest incidence of side effects occurred in the group receiving acetaminophen plus codeine, and the fewest side effects were reported by subjects administered flurbiprofen.
                The results of this study indicate that flurbiprofen is more effective and causes fewer effects than acetaminophen and codeine when used for post-operative dental pain, in ambulatory patients. The analgesic efficacy of single 500- and 1,000-mg doses of diflunisal (Dolobid), a new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic, was compared in a double-blind study with that of acetaminophen, 600 mg, the combination of acetaminophen, 600 mg, with codeine phosphate, 60 mg, and placebo in 159 oral surgery outpatients. Using a self-rating record, patients rated their pain and its relief hourly for 12 hours after medication. Both doses of diflunisal were significantly more effective than acetaminophen alone and produced peak analgesia comparable to that of the acetaminophen-codeine combination. Diflunisal proved to have an unusually long duration of analgesic action. Acetaminophen and the combination were significantly superior to placebo through hours 2 and 5, respectively; both doses of diflunisal were significantly superior through the end of the 12-hour observation period. None of the active treatments produced more side effects than the placebo.
This update confirms previous findings that combining paracetamol with codeine provided clinically useful levels of pain relief in about 50% of patients with moderate to severe postoperative pain, compared with under 20% with placebo. New information for remedication shows that the combination extended the duration of analgesia by about one hour compared to treatment with the same dose of paracetamol alone. At higher doses, more participants experienced adequate pain relief, but the amount of information available for the 1000 mg paracetamol plus 60 mg codeine dose was small, and based on limited information.