MRC/BHF Heart Protection Study of cholesterol-lowering with simvastatin in 5963 people with diabetes: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Effect of fluvastatin on proteinuria in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Simvastatin therapy for hypercholesterolemic patients with nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria. Effects of pravastatin on lipid levels, in vitro oxidizability of non-HDL lipoproteins and microalbuminuria in IDDM patients. Reduction of albumin excretion rate in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients during long-term simvastatin treatment. Impact of treatment of dyslipidemia on renal function, fat deposits and scarring in patients with persistent nephrotic syndrome. The effect of pravastatin on renal function and lipid metabolism in patients with renal dysfunction with hypertension and hyperlipidemia. Pravastatin and Renal Function Research Group. Effect of pravastatin on cardiovascular events in people with chronic kidney disease. Long-term fluvastatin reduces the hazardous effect of renal impairment on four-year atherosclerotic outcomes (a LIPS substudy). Safety and efficacy of fluvastatin in hyperlipidemic patients with chronic renal disease. Effect of cerivastatin on proteinuria and urinary podocytes in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. Renal function and insulin sensitivity during simvastatin treatment in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Atorvastatin improves metabolic control and endothelial function in type 2 diabetic patients: a placebo-controlled study. Cholesterol-lowering therapy may retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in patients with well-controlled hypertension. First United Kingdom Heart and Renal Protection (UK-HARP-I) study: biochemical efficacy and safety of simvastatin and safety of low-dose aspirin in chronic kidney disease. Safety and efficacy of atorvastatin in patients with severe renal dysfunction. Plasma lipoproteins and renal function during simvastatin treatment in diabetic nephropathy. A controlled, prospective study of the effects of atorvastatin on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease. Associated effect of hepatic hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase + angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of renal failure in hypertensive subjects. Effects of fosinopril and pravastatin on cardiovascular events in subjects with microalbuminuria. Effect of rosuvastatin on C-reactive protein and renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease. Add-on and withdrawal effect of pravastatin on proteinuria in hypertensive patients treated with AT receptor blockers. A prospective clinical trial comparing the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy and nephrotic syndrome with simvastatin and diet, versus diet alone. Effect of simvastatin on renal function in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease. Lipid modulation in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: effect on microvascular outcomes.
Individuals with diabetes are at increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, although typically their plasma concentrations of LDL cholesterol are similar to those in the general population. Previous evidence about the effects of lowering cholesterol in people with diabetes has been limited, and most diabetic patients do not currently receive cholesterol-lowering therapy despite their increased risk.
                5963 UK adults (aged 40-80 years) known to have diabetes, and an additional 14573 with occlusive arterial disease (but no diagnosed diabetes), were randomly allocated to receive 40 mg simvastatin daily or matching placebo. Prespecified analyses in these prior disease subcategories, and other relevant subcategories, were of first major coronary event (ie, non-fatal myocardial infarction or coronary death) and of first major vascular event (ie, major coronary event, stroke or revascularisation). Analyses were also conducted of subsequent vascular events during the scheduled treatment period. Comparisons are of all simvastatin-allocated versus all placebo-allocated participants (ie, intention to treat), which yielded an average difference in LDL cholesterol of 1.0 mmol/L (39 mg/dL) during the 5-year treatment period.
                Both among the participants who presented with diabetes and among those who did not, there were highly significant reductions of about a quarter in the first event rate for major coronary events, for strokes, and for revascularisations. For the first occurrence of any of these major vascular events among participants with diabetes, there was a definite 22% (95% CI 13-30) reduction in the event rate (601 [20.2%] simvastatin-allocated vs 748 [25.1%] placebo-allocated, p<0.0001), which was similar to that among the other high-risk individuals studied. There were also highly significant reductions of 33% (95% CI 17-46, p=0.0003) among the 2912 diabetic participants who did not have any diagnosed occlusive arterial disease at entry, and of 27% (95% CI 13-40, p=0.0007) among the 2426 diabetic participants whose pretreatment LDL cholesterol concentration was below 3.0 mmol/L (116 mg/dL). The proportional reduction in risk was also about a quarter among various other subcategories of diabetic patient studied, including: those with different duration, type, or control of diabetes; those aged over 65 years at entry or with hypertension; and those with total cholesterol below 5.0 mmol/L (193 mg/dL). In addition, among participants who had a first major vascular event following randomisation, allocation to simvastatin reduced the rate of subsequent events during the scheduled treatment period.
                The present study provides direct evidence that cholesterol-lowering therapy is beneficial for people with diabetes even if they do not already have manifest coronary disease or high cholesterol concentrations. Allocation to 40 mg simvastatin daily reduced the rate of first major vascular events by about a quarter in a wide range of diabetic patients studied. After making allowance for non-compliance, actual use of this statin regimen would probably reduce these rates by about a third. For example, among the type of diabetic patient studied without occlusive arterial disease, 5 years of treatment would be expected to prevent about 45 people per 1000 from having at least one major vascular event (and, among these 45 people, to prevent about 70 first or subsequent events during this treatment period). Statin therapy should now be considered routinely for all diabetic patients at sufficiently high risk of major vascular events, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations. 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors are established drugs for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia, but several studies have shown that benefits obtained with these drugs are not causally related only to regression of cholesterol lowering. Moreover, in experimental models of progressive renal disease, statins have reduced the extent of glomerulosclerosis. This study evaluated the antiproteinuric effect of a daily dose of 40 mg fluvastatin for 6 months in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, stable renal function, and no indicators of poor long-term prognosis. The effects of therapy were evaluated on the basis of 24-hour proteinuria (total proteinuria and albuminuria), albuminemia, creatinine clearance, cholesterol, and triglyceride values. Renal function remained stable in all patients. A significant decrease in proteinuria was observed after 6 months of therapy and persisted for all the observations. An increase in serum albumin was observed after 6 months of therapy. This study suggests that there is an antiproteinuric effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in moderately proteinuric patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. Experimental evidence suggests that lipid lowering therapy could slow the progression of renal disease in humans. We have conducted a double-blind, placebo controlled trial of the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with the nephrotic syndrome or significant proteinuria (> 1 g/day) and hypercholesterolemia (> or = 6.5 mmol/liter). Patients were placed on a lipid lowering diet for at least 10 weeks before randomization. After a four-week placebo run-in, 30 adults were randomized to simvastatin or placebo therapy (10 mg/day, increasing to 20 to 40 mg/day as required) for 24 weeks. There were seven dropouts, none of whom were "definitely" related to drug therapy. Total and LDL cholesterol levels fell by a mean of 33 and 31%, respectively, in simvastatin treated patients, compared with only 5 and 1% in patients on placebo (P < 0.001, P = 0.002, respectively). Apolipoprotein B100 levels fell by a mean of 31% in the simvastatin group but rose 0.3% in the placebo group (P = 0.014). There were no significant changes in HDL levels. There were no significant differences between the groups in their urine protein levels, their rise in plasma creatinine, or decline in plasma inulin clearance. Simvastatin is a safe, effective therapy for hypercholesterolemia in proteinuric states. A much larger trial is needed to show if potent lipid-lowering therapy slows progression of hypercholesterolemic proteinuric diseases. The effects of pravastatin on plasma lipid levels, in vitro oxidizability of the non-HDL fraction, metabolic control, urinary albumin excretion, and four serum enzymes (SGPT, SGOT, GT and CPK) were studied in 20 insulin-dependent diabetic patients (IDDM) with incipient nephropathy. The patients were divided into two groups and the study was carried out by a crossover design. After 12 weeks pravastatin treatment (20 mg daily), plasma cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B (Apo B) decreased by 22, 19 and 15%, respectively. The thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) formation and the oxidation lagtime of the non-HDL fraction during the in vitro incubation with copper were not changed before and after treatment. The HbA1c and blood glucose levels, urinary albumin excretion, SGOT, SGPT and GT were not influenced by pravastatin treatment. CPK activity was elevated after 12 weeks of pravastatin treatment, and this elevation persisted even after the 12 weeks placebo period. So, pravastatin could be used as an effective drug for IDDM patients with incipient nephropathy, but close monitoring of the CPK activity is recommended. To study the long-term effects of simvastatin on urinary albumin excretion rate (AER) in normotensive microalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with hypercholesterolemia.
                A total of 19 normotensive microalbuminuric hypercholesterolemic type 2 diabetic patients entered a double-blind crossover study for 2 years, receiving either simvastatin (20 mg/day) or placebo (each treatment for 1 year).
                Simvastatin significantly decreased plasma cholesterol (total and LDL) after 52 weeks of treatment. A concomitant significant decrease of AER (25% from basal) with no significant changes in creatinine clearance was observed during the same period.
                Our data are in keeping with the hypothesis that simvastatin might be used as an additional means to preserve renal function in microalbuminuric hypercholesterolemic type 2 diabetic patients. In this study 43 patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome were randomly distributed into 2 age- and sex-matched groups. The first group was given fluvastatin while the second was used as control. The cases in the 2 groups were evaluated clinically, biochemically (creatinine clearance, albumin, 24-hour proteinuria, and lipogram), neurologically, and histopathologically (examination of renal biopsies obtained basally and after 1 year of treatment with fluvastatin). In the fluvastatin-treated group but not in the control group, we observed a significant reduction in cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride. Clinical and laboratory assessment showed satisfactory tolerance of the drug by the patients. Proteinuria, serum albumin and creatinine clearance values were significantly better in the statin-treated patients. There was no difference in glomerular sclerosis between the 2 groups while interstitial fibrosis and renal fat deposits were less in the statin-treated group. The reduction in renal fat deposits in the statin-treated group was highly significant, while that of interstitial fibrosis was not. We conclude that: (1) statin can be safely and effectively used in the treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with persistent idiopathic nephrotic syndrome; (2) control of dyslipidemia in nephrotic patients is associated with better control of proteinuria and creatinine clearance; (3) statin treatment may cause regression of renal fat deposits in patients with nephrotic syndrome, and (4) longer term studies are still required to study further possible beneficial effects on renal histology and disease progression.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel The effect of pravastatin on renal function in hypertensive patients with mild renal dysfunction and hyperlipidemia was examined. A total of 57 subjects given dihydropyridine calcium blockers were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 25) and pravastatin groups (n = 32). The period of study was 6 months. In the placebo group, lipid metabolism did not change throughout the study period, but the serum creatinine concentration (Scr) increased from a baseline of 1.6+/-0.07 mg/dl to 2.1+/-0.2 mg/dl in the 6th month of study and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) increased from 26.2+/-1.1 mg/dl to 32.4+/-30.1 mg/dl. In the pravastatin group, the serum total cholesterol decreased from a baseline of 251.4+/-7.3 mg/dl to 218.2+/-6.5 mg/dl in the 6th month of study, while Scr (1.3+/-0.07 mg/dl vs. 1.3 +/-0.09 mg/dl) and BNU (20.5+/-1.2 mg/dl vs. 21.0+/-1.4 mg/dl) did not change. The change in Scr in the placebo group was significantly different from that in the pravastatin group (F = 3.75, p = 0.05). The slope of the change in 1/Scr was 0.02+/-0.07 dl x mg(-1) x month(-1) in placebo group and -0.01+/-0.03 dl x mg(-1) month(-1) in pravastatin group (P<0.05). The results indicate that pravastatin attenuates the deterioration of renal function in patients with mild renal dysfunction, together with an improvement of lipid metabolism. Limited data describe the cardiovascular benefit of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in people with moderate chronic kidney disease (CKD). The objective of this analysis was to determine whether pravastatin reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events in people with or at high risk for coronary disease and with concomitant moderate CKD.
                We analyzed data from the Pravastatin Pooling Project (PPP), a subject-level database combining results from 3 randomized trials of pravastatin (40 mg daily) versus placebo. Of 19 700 subjects, 4491 (22.8%) had moderate CKD, defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 30 to 59.99 mL/min per 1.73 m2 body surface area. The primary outcome was time to myocardial infarction, coronary death, or percutaneous/surgical coronary revascularization. Moderate CKD was independently associated with an increased risk of the primary outcome (adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.49) compared with those with normal renal function. Among the 4491 subjects with moderate CKD, pravastatin significantly reduced the incidence of the primary outcome (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.86), similar to the effect of pravastatin on the primary outcome in subjects with normal kidney function (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.94). Pravastatin also appeared to reduce the total mortality rate in those with moderate CKD (adjusted HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.00, P=0.045).
                Pravastatin reduces cardiovascular event rates in people with or at risk for coronary disease and concomitant moderate CKD, many of whom have serum creatinine levels within the normal range. Given the high risk associated with CKD, the absolute benefit that resulted from use of pravastatin was greater than in those with normal renal function. Mild renal impairment is an important risk factor for late cardiovascular complications. This substudy of the Lescol Intervention Prevention Study (LIPS) assessed the effect of fluvastatin on outcome of patients who had renal dysfunction and those who did not. Complete data for creatinine clearance calculation (Cockcroft-Gault formula) were available for 1,558 patients (92.9% of the LIPS population). Patients were randomized to fluvastatin or placebo after successful completion of a first percutaneous coronary intervention. Follow-up time was 3 to 4 years. The effect of baseline creatinine clearance on coronary atherosclerotic events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary reinterventions not related to restenosis) was evaluated. Baseline creatinine clearance (logarithmic transformation) was inversely associated with an incidence of adverse events among patients who received placebo (hazard ratio 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.982 to 0.998, p = 0.01). However, no association was noted between creatinine clearance and the incidence of adverse events among patients who received fluvastatin (hazard ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.0, p = 0.63). No further deterioration in creatinine clearance was observed during follow-up, regardless of baseline renal function or allocated treatment. Occurrence of adverse events was not related to changes in renal function during follow-up. Fluvastatin therapy markedly decreased the risk of coronary atherosclerotic events after percutaneous intervention in patients who had lower values of creatinine clearance at baseline. The benefit of fluvastatin was unrelated to any effect on renal function. There are few reports on the safety and efficacy of long-term treatment with statins in patients with chronic renal disease and hyperlipidemia. We evaluated these subjects treated with fluvastatin.
                After a 4-week run-in period, a total of 80 patients with diabetic nephropathy or chronic glomerulonephritis were randomly allocated to receive dietary therapy and fluvastatin 20 mg/day (n=39), or dietary therapy alone (n=41) for a period of 48 weeks. Lipid parameters, rhabdomyolysis-related indicators, 24-hour urinary albumin excretion and creatinine clearance were measured. The pharmacokinetics of fluvastatin was examined in 8 patients.
                Creatinine clearance and 24-hour urinary albumin excretion did not differ between the two groups. The peak serum fluvastatin concentration (Cmax) was 141+/-67 microg/L and the mean AUC0-6 h was 341+/-149 microgh/L. Fluvastatin treatment significantly lowered serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apo-lipoprotein B concentrations by 16%, 25%, and 22%, respectively, compared with patients receiving dietary therapy alone. There were no significant differences in serum triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentrations between the two treatment groups. Serum creatine kinase and aldolase concentrations did not change throughout treatment in both groups.
                Fluvastatin treatment significantly improved lipid parameters in patients with chronic renal disease. Fluvastatin was well tolerated, with no adverse effects on renal function and no muscular toxicity. However, the drug showed no direct renoprotective effects. We previously reported urinary podocytes to be a marker of glomerular injury. The aim of the present study was to determine whether cerivastatin, a newly developed, potent synthetic statin, affects proteinuria and urinary podocyte excretion in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN).
                We randomly assigned 40 normotensive hypercholesterolemic patients with CGN to receive either cerivastatin 0.15 mg/day (n=20) or placebo (n=20). Subjects comprised 24 men and 16 women, with a mean age of 40.8+/-14.4 years; 27 had IgA nephropathy and 13 had non-IgA proliferative glomerulonephritis. Treatment was continued for 6 months. Plasma total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglycerides, urinary protein excretion and the number of podocytes were measured before treatment and at 3 and 6 months after treatment.
                After 6 months, a significant reduction in total cholesterol (P<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) and triglycerides (P<0.05), and a significant increase in HDL-cholesterol (P<0.001) were observed in the group treated with cerivastatin. Urinary protein excretion decreased from 1.8+/-0.6 to 0.8+/-0.4 g/day, (P<0.01) in this group, and urinary podocyte excretion decreased from 1.6+/-0.6 to 0.9+/-0.4 cells/ml (P<0.01). However, placebo showed little effect on these lipid levels, urinary protein excretion and urinary podocyte excretion. The differences between the cerivastatin group and the placebo group were significant (cholesterol, P<0.001; LDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; triglycerides, P<0.05; HDL-cholesterol, P<0.001; urinary protein, P<0.01; and urinary podocytes, P<0.01).
                Statins such as cerivastatin may be beneficial for restoration of injured podocytes in patients with CGN and hypercholesterolaemia. The effect of simvastatin (10-20 mg/day) on kidney function, urinary albumin excretion rate and insulin sensitivity was evaluated in 18 Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with microalbuminuria and moderate hypercholesterolaemia (total cholesterol > or = 5.5 mmol.l-1). In a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled design treatment with simvastatin (n = 8) for 36 weeks significantly reduced total cholesterol (6.7 +/- 0.3 vs 5.1 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)), LDL-cholesterol (4.4 +/- 0.3 vs 2.9 +/- 0.2 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)) and apolipoprotein B (1.05 +/- 0.04 vs 0.77 +/- 0.02 mmol.l-1 (p < 0.01)) levels as compared to placebo (n = 10). Both glomerular filtration rate (mean +/- SEM) (simvastatin: 96.6 +/- 8.0 vs 96.0 +/- 5.7 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2, placebo: 97.1 +/- 6.7 vs 88.8 +/- 6.0 ml.min-1 x 1.73 m-2)(NS) and urinary albumin excretion rate (geometric mean x/divided by antilog SEM) (simvastatin: 18.4 x/divided by 1.3 vs 16.2 x/divided by 1.2 microgram.min-1, placebo 33.1 x/divided by 1.3 vs 42.7 x/divided by 1.3 micrograms.min-1)(NS) were unchanged during the study. A euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp was performed at baseline and after 18 weeks in seven simvastatin- and nine placebo-treated patients. Isotopically determined basal and insulin-stimulated glucose disposal was similarly reduced before and during therapy in both the simvastatin (2.0 +/- 0.1 vs 1.9 +/- 0.1 (NS) and 3.1 +/- 0.6 vs 3.1 +/- 0.7 mg.kg-1 x min-1 (NS)) and the placebo group (1.9 +/- 0.1 vs 1.8 +/- 0.1 (NS) and 4.1 +/- 0.6 vs 3.8 +/- 0.2 mg.kg-1 x min-1 (NS)).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Several pieces of evidence support a role of inflammatory processes in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis; it is also known that endothelial dysfunction is the initial lesion of the atherosclerotic process. Among other markers of endothelial dysfunction, some adhesion molecules seem to play an interesting role. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of atorvastatin vs placebo on some indexes of leukocytes adhesion in a group of Type 2 diabetic patients. Twenty-five Type 2 diabetic patients free from microangiopathic complications and with LDL-cholesterol lower than 180 mg/dl were randomized to receive either atorvastatin (T2DA) or placebo (T2Dp) for twelve months. BMI, fasting plasma glucose, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), albumin excretion rate (AER), lipid profile, and serum concentrations of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM1), E-selectin and cadherin-5 were measured at baseline and at the end of the follow-up. At T0 E-selectin was 16 +/- 6 ng/ml in T2DA and 17 +/- 13 in T2Dp; VCAM1 was 413 +/- 112 ng/ml in T2DA and 411 +/- 112 in T2Dp. At T12 VCAM1 and E-selectin did not vary in T2Dp, while a significant reduction was observed in T2DA (VCAM1 275 +/- 104 ng/ml and E-selectin 8 +/- 3 ng/ml; p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively). T2DA also showed a reduction of total and LDL cholesterol and an improved glycemic control respect to T2Dp. Hypolipidemic therapy was the strongest independent predictor of the cytokines variations along the time. These results confirm the role of statins in modulating endothelial function also in Type 2 diabetes, outlining a therapeutic role of these molecules probably independent from the hypolipidemic effect. There is experimental evidence to suggest that hypercholesterolaemia may play a pathogenetic role in progressive glomerular injury. We investigated the effect of cholesterol-lowering therapy on the progression of diabetic nephropathy in 34 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Patients were randomly assigned in a single-blind fashion to treatment with either lovastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (n = 16; mean dose 30.0 +/- 12.6 mg/day) or placebo (n = 18) for 2 years. Renal function was assessed by serially measuring the serum creatinine, glomerular filtration rate (using Cr51-EDTA), and 24-h urinary protein excretion. Lovastatin treatment was associated with significant reductions in total cholesterol (p < 0.001), LDL-cholesterol (p < 0.001) and apo B (p < 0.01), the reductions at 24 months being 26, 30 and 18%, respectively. Beneficial effects on serum triglyceride, HDL-cholesterol and apo A1 levels were also observed. Lp(a) showed no significant change in both groups. Glomerular filtration rate deteriorated significantly in the placebo group after 24 months (p < 0.025) but showed no significant change in the lovastatin-treated patients. The increase in serum creatinine was statistically significant (p < 0.02) in placebo-treated patients at 12 and 24 months, and in the lovastatin group after 24 months. Twenty-four hour urinary protein excretion increased in both groups (p < 0.05). Lovastatin treatment was not associated with significant elevations in liver or muscle enzymes. We conclude that effective normalisation of hypercholesterolaemia may retard the progression of diabetic nephropathy. Proteinuria is an important risk factor for cardiovascular and renal morbidity and mortality. The effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy on proteinuria in normolipidemic patients with well-controlled hypertension have not been studied. A total of 63 normolipidemic (total cholesterol <240 mg/dL) and proteinuric (300 to 3000 mg/d) patients with well-controlled blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) were randomized to receive either placebo (n=32) or pravastatin (10 mg/d; n=31) after a 3-month placebo period. Pravastatin lowered proteinuria after 6 months by 54% (P<0.0001). Creatinine clearance was stable throughout the study in the 2 groups. Despite unchanged plasma endothelin-1 levels throughout the study, urinary excretion of the peptide was decreased and significantly correlated with improvement in urinary protein excretion in pravastatin-treated patients (r=0.64, P=0.001). The urinary excretion of retinol-binding protein decreased after pravastatin administration, probably reflecting an improvement in tubular function. In contrast, the urinary excretion of IgG did not change significantly throughout the study in either group. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuria was only significantly correlated with statin use (P<0.0001, R2= 0.66). Linear regression analysis in the statin-treated group did not show any correlation between changes in lipid profiles and proteinuria regression. Thus, in addition to their primary function of antilipidemia, the addition of pravastatin to treatment for well-controlled hypertension may have an additive effect on reducing proteinuria independent of hemodynamics and lipid-lowering effects, possibly through inhibiting renal endothelin-1 synthesis and improving tubular function. Patients with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease, but the efficacy and safety of simvastatin and aspirin are unknown in this patient group.
                Patients were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 factorial design to the administration of: (1) 20 mg of simvastatin daily versus matching placebo, and (2) 100 mg of modified-release aspirin daily versus matching placebo.
                Overall, 448 patients with chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned (242 predialysis patients with a creatinine level > or = 1.7 mg/dL [> or =150 micromol/L], 73 patients on dialysis therapy, and 133 patients with a functioning transplant). Compliance with study treatments was 80% at 12 months. Allocation to treatment with 100 mg of aspirin daily was not associated with an excess of major bleeds (aspirin, 4 of 225 patients [2%] versus placebo, 6 of 223 patients [3%]; P = not significant [NS]), although there was a 3-fold excess of minor bleeds (34 of 225 [15%] versus 12 of 223 patients [5%]; P = 0.001). Among those with predialysis renal failure or a functioning transplant at baseline, aspirin did not increase the number of patients who progressed to dialysis therapy (7 of 187 [4%] versus 6 of 188 patients [3%]; P = NS) or experienced a greater than 20% increase in creatinine level (63 of 187 patients [34%] versus 56 of 188 patients [30%]; P = NS). After 12 months of follow-up, allocation to 20 mg of simvastatin daily reduced nonfasting total cholesterol levels by 18% (simvastatin, 163 mg/dL [4.22 mmol/L] versus placebo, 196 mg/dL [5.08 mmol/L]; P < 0.0001), directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 24% (89 mg/dL [2.31 mmol/L] versus 114 mg/dL [2.96 mmol/L]; P < 0.0001), and triglyceride levels by 13% (166 mg/dL [1.87 mmol/L] versus 186 mg/dL [2.10 mmol/L]; P < 0.01), but there was no significant effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (2% increase; P = NS). Allocation to simvastatin therapy was not associated with excess risk for abnormal liver function test results or elevated creatine kinase levels.
                During a 1-year treatment period, simvastatin, 20 mg/d, produced a sustained reduction of approximately one quarter in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, with no evidence of toxicity, and aspirin, 100 mg/d, did not substantially increase the risk for a major bleeding episode. Much larger trials are now needed to assess whether these treatments can prevent vascular events. To investigate the efficacy and safety of a daily dose of 10 mg of atorvastatin in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 and 5 and a glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml/min.
                This was an open, prospective, randomized study. A total of 143 patients were included: 73 were controls and 70 were prescribed 10 mg/day of atorvastatin. As efficacy variables, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels were determined at the start of the study and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24, 30 and 36 months.
                The follow-up period was a mean of 20+/-14.4 months (range 1-36 months) for those on atorvastatin versus 22+/-12.7 months (range 0.5-36 months) for the controls. Compared with baseline values, patients treated with atorvastatin had significantly lower concentrations of total cholesterol at Month 36 (5.8 vs 4.4 mmol/l; -23%; p<0.001), of LDL cholesterol at Month 36 (3.6 vs 2.2 mmol/l; -35%; p<0.001) and of triglycerides at Months 24 (2.5 vs 1.9 mmol/l) and 36 (2.5 vs 1.8 mmol/l). The controls had significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol at Month 36 (p<0.21) and of LDL cholesterol at Months 30 and 36. Compared with the controls, the atorvastatin group had lower levels of total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol at Months 1-30. Fifteen patients (21%) stopped taking their medication as they could not tolerate the side-effects, the most frequent complaints being gastrointestinal discomfort and headache.
                Although the medication caused no severe adverse events, we recommend caution when using atorvastatin for severe CKD patients until further evidence of its safety and efficacy is verified. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of simvastatin on plasma lipoproteins and renal function in hypercholesterolaemic Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with diabetic nephropathy. Twenty-six hypercholesterolaemic (total cholesterol greater than or equal to 5.5 mmol/l) Type 1 diabetic patients with nephropathy were enrolled in a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study for 12 weeks. The active treatment group (n = 14) received simvastatin (10-20 mg/day) for 12 weeks while the remaining 12 patients received treatment with placebo. The results during simvastatin treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks): total cholesterol 6.6 vs 4.8 mmol/l (p less than 0.01), LDL-cholesterol 4.25 vs 2.57 mmol/l (p less than 0.01) and apolipoprotein B 1.37 vs 1.06 mmol/l (p less than 0.01). HDL-cholesterol, and apolipoprotein A-I remained unchanged. Total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B remained unchanged during placebo treatment. Albuminuria measured during the simvastatin and the placebo treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks) (the data are logarithmically transformed before analysis because of their positively skewed transformation; geometric mean (x/divided by antilog SE) is indicated) was 458 (x/divided by 1.58) vs 393 (x/divided by 1.61) and 481 (x/divided by 1.62) vs 368 (x/divided by 1.78 micrograms/min (NS). Glomerular filtration rate during simvastatin and placebo treatment (baseline vs 12 weeks) was 64 vs 63 and 72 vs 74 ml.min-1.1.73 m-2, respectively. Two patients receiving simvastatin treatment were withdrawn, one due to gastrointestinal side effects and one due to myalgia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Chronic kidney diseases, particularly if presenting with significant proteinuria, are commonly associated with substantial alteration of serum lipid levels. Experimental evidence suggests that lipid abnormalities may contribute to the progression of kidney disease. However, studies in humans on the subject are scarce.
                In a prospective, controlled open-label study, the authors have evaluated the effects of one-year treatment with atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, versus no treatment on proteinuria and progression of kidney disease in 56 patients with chronic kidney disease. Before randomization, all patients had already been treated for one year with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonists (ARBs) and other antihypertensive drugs.
                By the end of one-year treatment, urine protein excretion decreased from 2.2 +/- 0.1 to 1.2 +/- 1.0 g every 24 hours (P < 0.01) in patients treated with atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor and ARBs. By contrast, urinary protein excretion decreased only from 2.0 +/- 0.1 to 1.8 +/- 0.1 g every 24 hours (P value not significant) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin in addition to ACE inhibitor or ARBs. During this time, creatinine clearance decreased only slightly and not significantly (from 51 +/- 1.8 to 49.8 +/- 1.7) in patients treated with atorvastatin. By contrast, during the same period of observation, creatinine clearance decreased from 50 +/- 1.9 to 44.2 +/- 1.6 mL/min (P < 0.01) in patients who did not receive atorvastatin.
                This study has shown that treatment with atorvastatin in addition to a regimen with ACE inhibitors or ARBs may reduce proteinuria and the rate of progression of kidney disease in patients with chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, and hypercholesterolemia. The benefits appear to occur in addition to those of treatment with ACE inhibitor and ARBs.
                Copyright 2003 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. nan Microalbuminuria is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether therapeutic intervention aimed at lowering urinary albumin excretion would reduce cardiovascular events in microalbuminuric subjects (15 to 300 mg/24 hours).
                From the Prevention of Renal and Vascular Endstage Disease (PREVEND) cohort (n=8592), 1439 subjects fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the PREVEND Intervention Trial (PREVEND IT). Of these subjects, 864 were randomized to fosinopril 20 mg or matching placebo and to pravastatin 40 mg or matching placebo. The mean follow-up was 46 months, and the primary end point was cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular morbidity. Mean age was 51+/-12 years; 65% of subjects were male, and 3.4% had a previous cardiovascular event. Mean cholesterol level was 5.8+/-1.0 mmol/L, mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 130+/-18/76+/-10 mm Hg, and median urinary albumin excretion was 22.8 (15.8 to 41.3) mg/24 hours. The primary end point occurred in 45 subjects (5.2%). Fosinopril reduced urinary albumin excretion by 26% (P<0.001). Subjects treated with fosinopril showed a 40% lower incidence of the primary end point (hazard ratio 0.60 [95% CI 0.33 to 1.10], P=0.098, log-rank). Pravastatin did not reduce urinary albumin excretion, and subjects treated with pravastatin showed a 13% lower incidence of the primary end point than subjects in the placebo group (0.87 [0.49 to 1.57], P=0.649, log-rank).
                In microalbuminuric subjects, treatment with fosinopril had a significant effect on urinary albumin excretion. In addition, fosinopril treatment was associated with a trend in reducing cardiovascular events. Treatment with pravastatin did not result in a significant reduction in urinary albumin excretion or cardiovascular events. The purpose of this 20-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin on fasting serum lipids and lipoproteins, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in 91 patients with chronic kidney disease. Patients were randomized to rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n = 48) or to no lipid-lowering treatment (n = 43) for 20 weeks. In contrast to patients not receiving rosuvastatin, patients receiving rosuvastatin tended to derive more favorable improvements from baseline values in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-43%, p <0.001, vs 7%, p = NS; p <0.001 for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment), hs-CRP (-47%, p <0.001, vs 7%, p = NS; p <0.001 for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment), and GFR (11%, p <0.05, vs 4%, p = NS; p = NS for change with rosuvastatin treatment vs change with no antilipemic treatment). Although angiotensin receptor antagonists and 3-hydroxy-3-methylgultaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) have been shown to attenuate proteinuria individually, it remains unclear whether proteinuria may be additionally improved by statin therapy in well-controlled hypertensive patients treated with angiotensin receptor antagonists-based regimen and whether withdrawal of chronic statin treatment may abrogate this beneficial effect in normolipidemic patients.
                A total of consecutive 82 proteinuric patients treated with antihypertensive agents, including losartan, were randomized 10 mg of pravastatin or placebo with a 6-month treatment. After completing 6 months of drug treatment, the pravastatin-treated patients were randomly assigned to continue (N= 19) or withdraw (N= 17) pravastatin for a further 6 months.
                Subjects treated with pravastatin had significant further improvement of proteinuria at 6 months compared with placebo group (559 +/- 251 mg/24 hours vs. 1262 +/- 557 mg/24 hours) (P < 0.0001). Of 17 patients assigned to withdraw pravastatin, proteinuria returned to the pretreatment levels and was significantly higher than those who continued treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that proteinuric improvement was significantly correlated with the continuous statin use. Urinary excretion of endothelin-1 (ET-1) is decreased in pravastatin-treated patients, but withdrawal of statin resulted in 27% up-regulation. The linear regression models in the initial statin-treated group showed that changes in urinary ET-1 correlated with urinary protein excretion (r= 0.83, P < 0.0001).
                We conclude that pravastatin administration is associated with improved proteinuria probably by inhibiting urine ET-1 levels in patients with losartan-based treatment. However, statin withdrawal abrogates this beneficial effect in patients initially responsive to this therapy. Of 17 patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN) and nephrotic syndrome, 9 were allocated to treatment with simvastatin (an HMG CoA-reductase inhibitor) and low cholesterol diet, and 8 to diet alone. At entry, the treatment and control groups did not differ in mean serum creatinines, chromium-labelled EDTA clearances, urinary protein/creatinine ratios, serum albumins, and lipid profiles. The mean follow up period (+/- SEM) in the treated group was 19.3 (+/- 4.4) months compared with 16.6 (+/- 5.9) months in the control group. At the end of the trial the fall in chromium-labelled EDTA clearances was similar (-1.27 versus -1.28 mls/min/months/1.73 m2) in the treatment and control groups respectively. The mean (+/- SEM) total and LDL-cholesterol had gone from 10.5 (+/- 0.94) and 8.02 (+/- 1) mmol/l to 5.2 (+/- 0.49) and 3.47 (+/- 0.44) respectively in the treated patients. Additionally the mean (+/- SEM) albumin and urinary protein/creatinine ratio went from 25.6 (+/- 2.4) gm/l and 0.52 (+/- 0.09) gm/mmol to 45.5 (+/- 2.8) and 0.13 (+/- 0.04) respectively. There was little change in total and LDL-cholesterol; albumin and urinary protein/creatinine ratio in the control group. This study supports the observation that lowering serum cholesterol in the nephrotic syndrome reduces proteinuria and increases serum albumin levels. No difference in the rate of decline in renal function could be demonstrated. In animal models, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were able to improve renal function and endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity. In various experimental renal diseases, including autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors improved the rate of decline in renal function. We studied the effect of simvastatin on ADPKD patients.
                In a double-blind cross-over study, 10 normocholesterolaemic ADPKD patients were treated in random order for 4 weeks with 40 mg simvastatin or placebo daily. After each treatment period, we investigated the effect of simvastatin on renal blood flow and endothelium-dependent vascular reactivity. These periods were separated by a 4-week wash-out period.
                After treatment with simvastatin, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) significantly increased from 124+/-4 ml/min to 132+/-6 ml/min (P<0.05). Simultaneously, effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) increased significantly from 494+/-30 ml/min to 619+/-67 ml/min after simvastatin treatment (P<0.05). These renal effects were accompanied by a significantly enhanced vasodilator response to acetylcholine in the forearm after simvastatin treatment. Total serum cholesterol levels were significantly reduced after treatment with simvastatin, from 4.24+/-0.32 to 3.17+/-0.22 mmol/l (P<0.001).
                We concluded that simvastatin treatment can ameliorate renal function in ADPKD patients, by increasing renal plasma flow, possibly via improvement of endothelial function. Long-term clinical trials with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are needed to confirm these results and to establish a chronic inhibiting effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on the progression towards end-stage renal disease in ADPKD patients. Although hyperlipidemia is associated with the development of diabetes complications, the effect of lipid reduction on microvascular complications is unknown. We initiated a 2-year, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled pilot trial of simvastatin/diet vs. diet alone in Type 1 diabetic patients without overt nephropathy. Thirty-nine patients with LDL cholesterol 100-160 mg/dl, >10 year duration of diabetes and an albumin excretion rate (AER) <200 microg/min were recruited for study. The primary end-point was change in AER. Secondary end-points were change in ankle-brachial index, progression of retinopathy status, change in vibratory threshold, and development of new clinical neuropathy. Nineteen patients were treated with simvastatin and twenty with placebo. However, because of the lowering of drug initiation levels by the American Diabetes Association, the trial was terminated early with 2 subjects reaching 2 years, 17 reaching 18 months, 36 reaching 1 year, and all 6 months. Simvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol (mean on treatment 173.4 vs. 191.4, P=.020) and LDL cholesterol (mean on treatment 105.0 vs. 127.7, P<.001). Simvastatin therapy was associated with a slower rise in AER compared to placebo, though the result was not statistically significant (median rate of change/month 0.004 vs. 0.029). There was a trend towards slower progression of neuropathy as measured by vibratory threshold (median change at 1 year 0.03 simvastatin vs. 0.94, P=.07). There was no difference in change in ankle-brachial index, clinical neuropathy status, or retinopathy status. In conclusion, treatment with simvastatin may have a beneficial effect on early nephropathy and diabetic neuropathy, justifying a fully powered trial. However, this would be difficult under current treatment guidelines.
Statins significantly reduced the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in CKD patients who are not receiving renal replacement therapy. They do not impact on the decline in renal function as measured by creatinine clearance, but may reduce protein excretion in urine. Statins appear to be safe in this population.  Guidelines recommendations on hyperlipidaemia management in CKD patients could therefore be followed targeting higher proportions of patients receiving a statin, with appropriate monitoring of adverse events.