Five year results of a randomized trial comparing hyperfractionated to conventional radiotherapy over four weeks in locally advanced head and neck cancer. Five compared with six fractions per week of conventional radiotherapy of squamous-cell carcinoma of head and neck: DAHANCA 6 and 7 randomised controlled trial. Hyperfractionation versus conventional fractionation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: final analysis of a randomized trial of the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy. A randomised trial of accelerated and conventional radiotherapy for stage III and IV squamous carcinoma of the head and neck: a Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study. Accelerated fractionation (AF) compared to conventional fractionation (CF) improves loco-regional control in the radiotherapy of advanced head and neck cancers: results of the EORTC 22851 randomized trial. Phase III randomized trial of very accelerated radiation therapy compared with conventional radiation therapy in squamous cell head and neck cancer: a GORTEC trial. A Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) phase III randomized study to compare hyperfractionation and two variants of accelerated fractionation to standard fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: first report of RTOG 9003. Prospective randomized trial comparing hyperfractionated versus conventional radiotherapy in stages III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma. A randomised multicentre trial of CHART versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. A multicentre randomized/controlled trial of a conventional versus modestly accelerated radiotherapy in the laryngeal cancer: influence of a 1 week shortening overall time. Randomized clinical trial on 7-day-continuous accelerated irradiation (CAIR) of head and neck cancer - report on 3-year tumour control and normal tissue toxicity. Hyperfractionated photon radiation therapy in the treatment of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and sinuses, using radiation therapy as the only planned modality: (preliminary report) by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG). Continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with/without mitomycin C in head and neck cancers. Locoregionally advanced carcinoma of the oropharynx: conventional radiotherapy vs. accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy vs. concomitant radiotherapy and chemotherapy--a multicenter randomized trial. A randomised trial of accelerated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer.
Fractionation strategies delivered over 4 weeks are of clinical and radiobiological interest because treatment is completed before radiotherapy (RT) induced clonogen proliferation commences in earnest approximately 3 to 4 weeks into a course of RT. We wished to test the clinical hypothesis that an increased total dose delivered over 4 weeks with smaller than standard doses per fraction in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) may result in relative protection of late responding tissues and an increased tumor control compared to a conventional daily course in the same overall time.
                Between 1988 and 1995 a randomized controlled trial employing RT alone was undertaken at the Princess Margaret Hospital that included 331 eligible patients with T3 or T4 N0 or any N-positive oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx primary SCC. RT was randomly assigned to one of two 4 week schedules, either 51 Gy in 20 equal daily fractions, termed conventional fractionation (CF), or 58 Gy in 40 equal fractions given twice per day as a hyperfractionated (HF) experimental arm.
                The 5-year local relapse rate was reduced in the HF (41%) compared to the CF arm (49%). This difference was marginally not significant (p=0.082) when the effect was not adjusted. When the effect of the treatment was adjusted by Cox model for clinical factors that included N-category, ECOG performance status, site of disease, T-category, age, hemoglobin, and gender the HF achieved a significant effect (p=0.02). Survival (40% vs. 30%) was also improved with HF compared to CF arm. This difference was only marginally not significant (p=0.069) but again achieved statistical significance when the model was adjusted for clinical factors (p=0.01). Similar results were observed for disease free survival. Although reversible acute toxicity was increased with HF, the overall 5-year rate of grade 3 and 4 late toxicity for the CF was 10.5% compared to 7.7% in the higher dose HF arm.
                HF delivered in 4 weeks permits enhanced RT doses achieving improved tumor control, without increased late toxicity, compared to daily fractionated radiotherapy in the same overall time. Although head and neck cancer can be cured by radiotherapy, the optimum treatment time for locoregional control is unclear. We aimed to find out whether shortening of treatment time by use of six instead of five radiotherapy fractions per week improves the tumour response in squamous-cell carcinoma.
                We did a multicentre, controlled, randomised trial. Between January, 1992, and December, 1999, of 1485 patients treated with primary radiotherapy alone, 1476 eligible patients were randomly assigned five (n=726) or six (n=750) fractions per week at the same total dose and fraction number (66-68 Gy in 33-34 fractions to all tumour sites except well-differentiated T1 glottic tumours, which were treated with 62 Gy). All patients, except those with glottic cancers, also received the hypoxic radiosensitiser nimorazole. Analysis was by intention to treat.
                More than 97% of the patients received the planned total dose. Median overall treatment times were 39 days (six-fraction group) and 46 days (five-fraction group). Overall 5-year locoregional control rates were 70% and 60% for the six-fraction and five-fraction groups, respectively (p=0.0005). The whole benefit of shortening of treatment time was seen for primary tumour control (76 vs 64% for six and five fractions, p=0.0001), but was non-significant for neck-node control. Six compared with five fractions per week improved preservation of the voice among patients with laryngeal cancer (80 vs 68%, p=0.007). Disease-specific survival improved (73 vs 66% for six and five fractions, p=0.01) but not overall survival. Acute morbidity was significantly more frequent with six than with five fractions, but was transient.
                The shortening of overall treatment time by increase of the weekly number of fractions is beneficial in patients with head and neck cancer. The six-fractions-weekly regimen has become the standard treatment in Denmark. EORTC protocol 22791 compared once daily fractionation (CF) of 70 Gy in 35-40 fractions in 7-8 weeks, to pure hyperfractionation (HF) of 80.5 Gy in 70 fractions in 7 weeks using 2 fractions of 1.15 Gy per day, in T2-T3 oropharyngeal carcinoma (excluding base of tongue), N0,N1 of less than 3 cm. From 1980 to 1987, 356 patients were entered. In the final analysis (June 1990), the local control was significantly higher (p = 0.02 log-rank) after HF compared with CF. At 5 years, 59% of patients are local disease-free in the HF arm compared to 40% in the CF arm. The superiority of HF was demonstrated in patients staged T3N0,T3N1 but not in T2. The Cox model confirmed that the treatment regimen was an independent significant prognostic factor for locoregional control (p = 0.007 log-rank). This improvement of locoregional control was responsible for a trend to an improved survival (p = 0.08 log-rank). There was no difference in late normal tissue damage between the two treatment modalities. The aims of this randomized controlled trial were to determine whether there were differences in the disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity between conventional radiotherapy (CRT) and a continuous 3 week accelerated radiotherapy regimen (ART) in stage III and IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx.
                Patients from 14 centres throughout Australia and New Zealand were randomly assigned to either CRT, using a single 2 Gy/day to a dose of 70 Gy in 35 fractions in 49 days or to ART, using 1.8 Gy twice a day to a dose of 59.4 Gy in 33 fractions in 24 days. Treatment allocation was stratified for site and stage. The accrual began in 1991 and the trial was closed in 1998 when the target of 350 patients was reached.
                The median potential follow-up time was 53 months (range, 14-101). The DFS at 5 years was 41% (95% CI, 33-50%) for ART and 35% (95% CI, 27-43%) for CRT (P=0.323) and the hazard ratio was 0.87 in favour of ART (95% CI, 0.66-1.15). The 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 40% for CRT and 46% for ART (P=0.398) and the loco-regional control was 47% for CRT vs. 52% for ART (P=0.300). The respective hazard ratios were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.65-1.2) and 0.85 (0.62-1.16), favouring the accelerated arm. In the ART arm, confluent mucositis was more severe (94 vs. 71%; P<0.001) and peaked about 3 weeks earlier than in the CRT arm, but healing appeared complete in all cases. There were statistically significant reductions in the probability of grade 2 or greater late soft tissue effects over time in the ART arm (P<0.05), except for the mucous membrane where late effects were similar in both arms.
                Differences in DFS, disease-specific survival and loco-regional control have not been demonstrated. ART resulted in more acute mucosal toxicity, but this did not result in greater prolongation of the treatment time compared with the CRT arm. There were less late effects in the ART arm, with the exception of late mucosal effects. This trial has confirmed that tumour cell repopulation occurs during conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. However, it has also provided additional evidence that overall improvements in the therapeutic ratio using accelerated fractionation strategies are seriously constrained by the need to limit total doses to levels that do not exceed acute mucosal tolerance. The accelerated schedule tested has been shown in this trial to be an acceptable alternative to conventionally fractionated irradiation to 70 Gy. A 5 week-hyperfractionated and accelerated radiotherapy regimen without reduction of the total dose was developed to fight tumour repopulation during treatment and tumour hypoxia. The purpose of the study was to try to improve loco-regional control in high risk head and neck carcinoma treated with curative radiotherapy.
                From 1985 to 1995, a randomised controlled trial of the EORTC Cooperative Group of Radiotherapy (EORTC 22851) compared the experimental regimen (72 Gy/45 fractions/5 weeks) to standard fractionation and overall treatment time (70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks) in T2, T3 and T4 head and neck cancers (hypopharynx excluded). The end-point criteria were local and loco-regional control, overall and disease-free survival, and acute and late toxicities. Five hundred twelve patients were accrued.
                Patients in the AF (accelerated fractionation) arm did significantly better with regard to loco-regional control (P = 0.02) resulting at 5 years in a 13% gain (95% CI 3-23% gain) in loco-regional control over the CF (conventional fractionation) arm. This improvement is of larger magnitude in patients with poorer prognosis (N2-3 any T, T4 any N) than in patients with more favourable stage. Multivariate analysis confirmed AF as an independent prognostic factor of good prognosis for loco-regional control (P = 0.03). Specific survival shows a trend (P = 0.06) in favour of the AF arm. ACUTE AND LATE TOXICITIES: Acute and late toxicity were increased in the AF arm. Late severe functional irradiation damage occurred in 14% of patients of the AF arm versus 4% in the CF arm. Two cases of radiation-induced myelitis occurred after doses of 42 and 48 Gy to the spinal cord.
                This trial shows that accelerated radiotherapy improves loco-regional control in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. A less toxic scheme should, however, be investigated and documented before using accelerated radiotherapy as a standard regimen of curative radiotherapy for head and neck cancers. With the aim to increase the dose intensity of radiation therapy (RT), and subsequently the locoregional control rate, a very accelerated RT regimen was compared with conventional RT in a series of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).
                Between 1994 and 1998, 268 patients with T3 or T4, N0 to N3 HNSCC (staged by 1997 International Union Against Cancer criteria) that was not eligible for surgery were randomly assigned to receive either conventional RT, delivering 70 Gy in 7 weeks to the primary tumor and 35 fractions of 2 Gy over 49 days, or to receive very accelerated RT, delivering 62 to 64 Gy in 31 to 32 fractions of 2 Gy over 22 to 23 days (2 Gy/fraction bid).
                The most common tumor site was the oropharynx and most of the patients (70%) had T4 and N1 to N3 tumors in 72% of patients. The main patient and tumor characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. The median total doses were 63 Gy (accelerated) and 70 Gy (conventional), with a median overall time of 22 days and 48 days, respectively. Acute mucositis was markedly increased in the accelerated-RT arm (P < .001). The locoregional control rate was improved by 24% at 6 years with accelerated RT. In contrast, disease-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between the two arms. There was no difference in late effects between the two arms.
                The very accelerated RT regimen was feasible and provided a major benefit in locoregional control but had a modest effect on survival. The optimal fractionation schedule for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer has been controversial. The objective of this randomized trial was to test the efficacy of hyperfractionation and two types of accelerated fractionation individually against standard fractionation.
                Patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy delivered with: 1) standard fractionation at 2 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week, to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks; 2) hyperfractionation at 1. 2 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week to 81.6 Gy/68 fractions/7 weeks; 3) accelerated fractionation with split at 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily, 5 days/week, to 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks including a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or 4) accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost at 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 days/week and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field as a second daily treatment for the last 12 treatment days to 72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks. Of the 1113 patients entered, 1073 patients were analyzable for outcome. The median follow-up was 23 months for all analyzable patients and 41.2 months for patients alive.
                Patients treated with hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost had significantly better local-regional control (p = 0.045 and p = 0.050 respectively) than those treated with standard fractionation. There was also a trend toward improved disease-free survival (p = 0.067 and p = 0.054 respectively) although the difference in overall survival was not significant. Patients treated with accelerated fractionation with split had similar outcome to those treated with standard fractionation. All three altered fractionation groups had significantly greater acute side effects compared to standard fractionation. However, there was no significant increase of late effects.
                Hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation with concomitant boost are more efficacious than standard fractionation for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Acute but not late effects are also increased. From April 1986 to May 1989, 112 patients seen at a single institution with previously untreated squamous cell oropharynx carcinoma, Stages III and IV, were randomly assigned to 66 Gy in 33 fractions of 2 Gy each (conventional RT) versus 70.4 Gy in 64 fractions of 1.1 Gy given twice a day with a minimal interfraction interval of 6 hours (hyperfractionated RT). The overall time for both arms was 6 1/2 weeks. Patients were stratified by site (base of the tongue vs others), T stage (T1/T2 vs T3 vs T4), N stage (N0/N1 vs N2 vs N3), and lymphnode size (less than 6 cm vs greater than 6 cm). As of January 1990, an analysis was performed in 98 patients (8 patients in the conventional arm and 6 in the hyperfractionation not included). The groups were balanced by age, performance status, stage, and site of the primary disease. The median follow-up time was 25 months. The probability of complete loco-regional response was 62% in the hyperfractionation arm and 52% for the conventional fractionation (p = 0.28). There was no difference in the control of lymphnodal disease (hyperfractionated = 55%, conventional = 57%; p = 0.92), but the disease control in the oropharynx only was significantly improved in the hyperfractionation arm (84% vs 64%, p = 0.02). Overall survival rate at 42 months was 27% for the hyperfractionation arm and 8% for the conventional (p = 0.03). Survival rates for hyperfractionated versus conventional RT were 40% versus 18% (p = 0.06), respectively, for Stage III patients and 16% versus 0% (p = 0.15), respectively, for Stage IV. There was significant improvement in survival in favor of the hyperfractionation arm in patients with lesions outside the base of the tongue (31% vs 15%, p = 0.02), for those with a 50-70% Karnofsky status (19% vs 0%, p = 0.006) and for patients with N0/N1 disease (38% vs 15%, p = 0.03). Acute toxicities were of similar magnitude, although both skin and mucosal reactions appeared earlier on the hyperfractionation scheme. To date, no differences in late toxicity have been observed. We conclude that in a subset group of patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the oropharynx, hyperfractionated radiotherapy appears to provide improved survival without adding to increased toxicity. Continuous, hyperfractionated, accelerated radiotherapy (CHART) has shown promise of improved tumour control and reduced late morbidity in pilot studies and has now been tested in a multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial.
                Patients with squamous cell cancer in the main sites within the head and neck region with the general exception of early T1 N0 tumours were entered into the study by 11 centres. There was a 3:2 randomisation to either CHART, where a dose of 54 Gy was given in 36 fractions over 12 days, or to conventional therapy where 66 Gy was given in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks. A total of 918 patients were included over a 5 year period from March 1990.
                ACUTE MORBIDITY: Acute radiation mucositis was more severe with CHART, occurred earlier but settled sooner and was in nearly all cases healed by 8 weeks in both arms. Skin reactions were less severe and settled more quickly in the CHART treated patients. TUMOUR CONTROL AND SURVIVAL: Life table analyses of loco-regional control, primary tumour control, nodal control, disease-free interval, freedom from metastasis and survival showed no evidence of differences between the two arms. In exploratory subgroup analyses there was evidence of a greater response to CHART in younger patients (P = 0.041) and poorly differentiated tumours appeared to fare better with conventional radiotherapy (P = 0.030). In the larynx there was evidence of a trend towards increasing benefit with more advanced T stage (P = 0.002). LATE TREATMENT RELATED MORBIDITY: Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 0.4% of patients after CHART and 1.4% of patients after conventional radiotherapy. The incidence of chondritis or cartilage necrosis was similar in both arms. Life table analysis showed evidence of reduced severity in a number of late morbidities in favour of CHART. These were most striking for skin telangiectasia, superficial and deep ulceration of the mucosa and laryngeal oedema.
                Similar local turnout control was achieved by CHART as compared with conventional radiotherapy despite the reduction in total dose from 66 to 54 Gy supporting the importance of repopulation as a cause of radiation failure. The effects seen in advanced laryngeal cancer and those related to histological differentiation need further study. Reduced late morbidity is a factor which together with patient preference should be considered in the decision as to the programme of radiotherapy to employ in the curative treatment of head and neck cancer. To compare in a phase III study the loco-regional control, disease-free survival and overall survival induced by an accelerated regimen (AF) as compared with conventional regimen (CF) and to analyze the early and late post-radiation morbidity in both arms.
                Patients with age < or = 75, WHO 0-1, suitable for a radical course of radiotherapy T1-T3, N0, M0, stage of glottic and supraglottic laryngeal cancer were randomized to either CF: 66Gy given in 33 fractions over 45 days or AF: 66Gy given in 33 fractions over 38 days (2 fractions every Thursday). A total of 395 patients were included from 05.1995 to 12.1998.
                Early toxicity: At the end of radiotherapy patients treated with AF complained for more severe reactions than patients treated with CF. In 8 weeks after treatment completion patients treated with AF complained only for more severe pain on swallowing (P=0.027). In 4 months after treatment completion all types of toxicity except for skin teleangiectasia (P=0.001) were similar in the two groups. Loco-regional control: comparison between CF and AF showed no difference in terms of loco-regional control (P=0.37).
                The improvement in AF in terms of loco-regional control is estimated to be 3-5% in comparison with conventional regimen and is not significant. The intensity of reactions after 4 months was similar in both arms, what suggests the possibility of further shortening of the overall time by few days or enhancing the total dose within the limits of acceptable morbidity. To evaluate tumour and normal tissues 3-year response to 7-day-a-week continuous accelerated irradiation (CAIR) compared to a conventional treatment (5 days per week) in a randomized trial.
                One hundred patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in stage T(2-4)N(0-1)M(0) were entered into the trial between December 1, 1993 and June 30, 1996. Dose per fraction of 2.0 Gy (to the end of 1994), and 1.8 Gy (since January 1, 1995) was the same in both arms and delivered once a day at regular 24-h intervals to total dose in the range of 66-72 Gy (depending on tumour stage). The only difference was overall treatment time being 5 weeks in the CAIR and 7 weeks in control arm.
                Actuarial 3-year local tumour control was 82% in the CAIR and 37% in the control group (P<0.0001) with reduction in local recurrence rate of 83%. Actuarial 3-year overall survival was 78 and 32% (P<0.0001), respectively. Confluent mucositis was significantly more severe and lasted longer in the CAIR than in control arm. After 2.0 Gy fractions five of 23 patients (22%) in the CAIR developed early necroses over a period of 2-4 months of follow-up which can be considered as a consequential to severe protracted acute mucosal reactions (CLE). For this reason dose per fraction was lowered to 1. 8 Gy and the CLE was not observed again until now. Thus the overall rate of CLE decreased to 10%.
                The gain in tumour control is likely the effect of shortening of overall treatment time by 14 days and regular continuous dose delivery during the whole course of radiation therapy including weekends. A 7-day schedule produces more severe acute mucosal reactions lasting longer than in conventional fractionation, however tolerable by patients. Relatively high rate (22%) of CLE in the 7-day arm observed during the first year of the study was eliminated by decreasing dose per fraction from 2.0 Gy to 1.8 Gy. From August 1979 to June 1983, the RTOG conducted a prospective Phase III study that compared a standard schedule with five fractions per week of 180 to 200 cGy per day to a total dose of 6600-7380 cGy, with a hyperfractionation regimen consisting of two fractions of 120 cGy per day, separated by a rest period of 3 to 6 hours for a total of 6000 cGy. A total of 210 patients were entered, of which 187 are analyzed. Complete initial tumor clearance in the head and neck was achieved by radiotherapy in 61% of the patients assigned to the standard schedules and in 59% of those assigned to the continuous hyperfractionation schedule; surgical salvage contributed towards achieving complete response in 5% and 7% of patients, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for loco-regional control of tumor at 1 and 2 years was 39% and 29% for the standard schedules, and 43% and 30% for the hyperfractionation schedule. The endpoints examined to evaluate therapeutic effects do not indicate that the stated hyperfractionation schedule is different than the standard RTOG treatment schedule for head and neck cancer. Acute normal tissue reactions appear to be more severe with the hyperfractionation schedule but the incidence of late reactions is similar in both groups. There is a tendency toward more severe acute reactions when the interval between the two fractions per day is 4.5 hrs or less in comparison to intervals longer than 4.5 hrs. Radiation therapy is often the primary treatment for advanced cases of head and neck cancers not considered suitable for radical surgery. In these cases locoregional tumour control rates are low and has warranted innovative treatment modifications, such as altered fractionation schedules and combination with chemotherapy.
                From October 1990 to December 1997, 239 patients with squamous cell cancers originating in the head and neck region were randomized to one of three treatment options. Standard therapy consisting of conventional fractionation with 70 Gy in 7 weeks in 35 fractions (CF). The second treatment option consisted of a continuous hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy delivering a total dose of 55.3 Gy in 33 fractions over 17 consecutive days (V-CHART). The third study arm had identical fractionation and dose as the above accelerated treatment, with the additional administration of 20 mg/m(2) mitomycin C (MMC) on day 5 of treatment (V-CHART+MMC).
                Main toxicity resulted from accelerated fractionation in confluent mucositis (Grade 3-4 in 95%) requiring nasogastral tube feeding, analgetics and antiphlogistics in the majority of cases. Haematological toxicity Grade 3-4 was seen after MMC administration in 18%. MMC administration did not influence mucosal reaction. Overall duration of mucositis was not different in the three treatment groups. Loco-regional tumour control was 31% after CF, 32% after V-CHART and 48% after V-CHART+MMC, respectively (P<0.05). Overall crude survival was 24% after CF, 31% following V-CHART and 41% after V-CHART+MMC, respectively (P<0.05). Median follow up was 48 months (assessment performed in February 1999).
                Following shortening overall treatment time from 7 weeks to 17 consecutive days and dose of radiotherapy from 70 to 55.3 Gy the results in the radiotherapy only treated patients are identical. A significant improvement regarding local tumour control and survival was seen following administration of MMC to the accelerated fractionated treatment. To compare conventional fractionation radiation therapy (RT), Arm A, vs. split-course accelerated hyperfractionated RT (S-AHF), Arm B, vs. conventional fractionation RT plus concomitant chemotherapy (CT), Arm C, in terms of survival and toxicity for advanced, unresectable epidermoid tumors of oropharynx.
                Between January 1993 and June 1998, 192 previously untreated patients affected with Stage III and IV oropharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T1N1 and T2N1) were accrued in a multicenter, randomized Phase III trial (ORO 93-01). For Arms A and C, 66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions, 5 days a week, were administered in 6.5-7 weeks to tumor and positive nodes. In Arm B, the dose delivered to tumor and involved nodes was 64-67.2 Gy, giving 2 fractions of 1.6 Gy every day with an interfraction interval of at least 4 h and preferably 6 h, 5 days a week. At 38.4 Gy, a 2-week split was planned; after the split, RT was resumed with the same modality. In Arm C, CT regimen consisted of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CBDCA 75 mg/m(2), Days 1-4; 5-FU 1,000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 96 h, Days 1-4, recycling every 28 days (at 1st, 5th, and 9th week).
                No statistically significant difference was detected in overall survival (p = 0.129): 40% Arm A vs. 37% Arm B vs. 51% Arm C were alive at 24 months. Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of event-free survival (p = 0.196): 20% for Arm A, 19% for Arm B, and 37% for Arm C were event free at 24 months. On the contrary, the 2-year disease-free survival was significantly different among the three arms (p = 0.022), with a superiority for Arm C. At 24 months, the proportion of patients without relapse was 42% for Arm C vs. 23% for Arm A and 20% for Arm B. Patients in Arm A less frequently developed G3+ acute mucositis than their counterparts in Arm B or C (14.7% vs. 40.3% vs. 44%). Regarding the CT-related acute toxicity, apart from 1 case of fatal nephrotoxicity, only hematologic G3+ (Grade 3 or higher) acute sequelae were observed (World Health Organization scale), most commonly leukopenia (22.7%). Arm C showed slightly more G3+ skin, s.c. tissue, and mucosal late side effects (RTOG scale), although significant sequelae were relatively uncommon, and mucosal sequelae were most commonly transient. The occurrence of persistent G3 xerostomia was comparable in all three treatment arms.
                The combination of simultaneous CT and RT with the regimen of this trial is better than RT alone in advanced oropharyngeal squamous-cell carcinomas, by increasing disease-free survival. This improvement, however, did not translate into an overall survival improvement, and was associated with a higher incidence of acute morbidity. To study the effect of accelerated radiation treatment in locally advanced head and neck cancer, a prospective randomised trial was conducted comparing two fractionation schemes which differed only in the overall treatment time; fraction size and total dose were the same in both arms.
                Eighty-two patients with stage 3 or 4 squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx or larynx considered suitable for radical radiotherapy as primary treatment were stratified by site and stage and randomised to receive 66 Gy in 33 2 Gy daily fractions in 45-48 days (o.d.) or 66 Gy in 33 2 Gy twice daily fractions in 22-25 days (b.i.d.).
                An initial improved clinical response in tumour control in the b.i.d. arm was not sustained and the 3 year recurrence free survival and overall survival rates were similar and not significantly different. The actuarial recurrence free survival was 49.1% in the b.i.d. arm and 44.3% in the o.d. arm. The disease free 3 year survival was 59.4% and 56.8%, respectively. The acute and late normal tissue effects were scored using the RTOG scale. As expected the acute effects were much greater in the b.i.d. arm. The combined grade 3 and 4 late effects were similar but the proportion of grade 4 reactions was significantly higher in the b.i.d. arm. The increase in grade 4 toxicity caused the trial to be discontinued after 82 of the planned 226 patients had been randomised.
                The severity of the normal tissue effects and a failure to demonstrate sustained local control does not support this fractionation scheme in patients with such extensive head and neck cancer.
Altered fractionation radiotherapy improves survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of the different types of altered radiotherapy suggests that hyperfractionation provides the greatest benefit. An update of this IPD meta-analysis (MARCH 2), which will increase the power of this analysis and allow for other comparisons, is currently in progress.