Efficacy of aminophylline in the treatment of acute asthma exacerbation in children. Randomised controlled trial of aminophylline for severe acute asthma. Theophylline does not shorten hospital stay for children admitted for asthma. Efficacy of intravenously administered theophylline in children hospitalized with severe asthma. Hospital treatment of asthma: lack of benefit from theophylline given in addition to nebulized albuterol and intravenously administered corticosteroid. Aminophylline therapy does not improve outcome and increases adverse effects in children hospitalized with acute asthmatic exacerbations. Intravenous theophylline in pediatric status asthmaticus. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
The role of aminophylline (ethylene diamine salt of theophylline) in the treatment of acute exacerbation of asthma has not been well established in children.
                The aim of the study was to determine the additional therapeutic benefit of intravenous aminophylline in the treatment of children hospitalized for acute asthmatic exacerbation and treated with inhaled bronchodilators and glucocorticoid therapy.
                Thirty-eight children aged from 2 to 16 years (mean age 5.64 +/- 3.31), admitted for acute exacerbation of asthma, participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. All the subjects received methylprednisolone, administered intravenously, and nebulized salbutamol. The treatment group received intravenous aminophylline therapy and the placebo group received 0.9% saline solution for 24 hours.
                The number of salbutamol nebulizations needed and the clinical asthma scoring were recorded both at onset and at the end of 24 hours. There was no significant difference in either the mean number of nebulizations or the clinical asthma scores between the two groups (P = .7843, P = .8452).
                Intravenous aminophylline (ethylene diamine salt of theophylline) demonstrated no additional beneficial effect to the combination of beta adrenergic agonists and glucocorticoid treatment in acute asthma attack in children. To determine whether children with severe acute asthma treated with large doses of inhaled salbutamol, inhaled ipratropium, and intravenous steroids are conferred any further benefits by the addition of aminophylline given intravenously.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial of 163 children admitted to hospital with asthma who were unresponsive to nebulised salbutamol.
                The placebo and treatment groups of children were similar at baseline. The 48 children in the aminophylline group had a greater improvement in spirometry at six hours and a higher oxygen saturation in the first 30 hours. Five subjects in the placebo group were intubated and ventilated after enrollment compared with none in the aminophylline group.
                Aminophylline continues to have a place in the management of severe acute asthma in children unresponsive to initial treatment. To determine if the use of intravenous theophylline, in the form of aminophylline, when added to systemic corticosteroids and aerosolized beta 2-agonists, enhances the improvement of children with acute asthma exacerbations.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trial.
                The University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, an urban primary- and tertiary-care pediatric medical center.
                Forty-two children, aged 2 to 18 years, admitted to the hospital for acute exacerbations of asthma.
                Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous theophylline to maintain a serum level greater than 55 mumol/L or a placebo infusion. All patients received methylprednisolone and nebulized albuterol. A clinical severity score was assessed twice daily.
                The mean length of stay for the treatment and control groups was 52.3 +/- 32.3 hours and 48.2 +/- 26.6 hours, respectively (t = 0.45, P = .65). The rate of improvement of clinical scores was similar.
                These data suggest that the addition of theophylline to albuterol and corticosteroids does not enhance improvement of children admitted to the hospital with asthma. To determine whether intravenously administered theophylline, when added to frequently nebulized albuterol and intravenously administered methylprednisolone, benefits children hospitalized with severe asthma.
                Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study.
                Inpatient pediatric service at a tertiary-care teaching hospital.
                Twenty-one children 5 to 18 years of age.
                All patients received 2.5 to 5.0 mg of nebulized albuterol every 20 minutes to every 6 hours, intravenously administered methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg every 6 hours), and either intravenously administered theophylline (as aminophylline) or placebo for 36 hours. Serum theophylline concentrations were maintained between 55 and 110 mumol/L (between 10 and 20 micrograms/ml) by adjusting loading doses and continuous infusion rates.
                Forced expired volume in 1 second (FEV1) and clinical score were measured at 0, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 hours after the start of each individual study. The total number of nebulizations, total albuterol dosage, adverse effects, and duration of hospital stay were recorded. Twelve children received theophylline and nine received placebo. The two groups did not differ significantly in age, sex, or baseline FEV1. In both groups, clinical score significantly improved from baseline by 12 hours, and FEV1 by 24 hours (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in FEV1 or clinical score at any of the measured time points. There were no significant differences in rate of improvement in FEV1, total number of nebulizations, total albuterol dosage, or duration of hospital stay. Adverse effects were mild and infrequent and did not differ significantly between the two groups.
                Theophylline, at therapeutic concentrations, did not additionally benefit children hospitalized with severe asthma who were being treated frequently with nebulized albuterol and with methylprednisolone intravenously. To determine the efficacy of theophylline when given in addition to nebulized albuterol and intravenously administered corticosteroid to children hospitalized with mild to moderate asthma.
                Randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.
                Tertiary-care children's hospital.
                Twenty-nine patients with asthma between the ages of 2 and 16 years completed the study. The treatment and placebo groups were similar in age, gender, race, illness severity, and emergency department treatment.
                All patients received intravenously administered methylprednisolone and nebulized albuterol. The treatment group received intravenous theophylline therapy and the placebo group dextrose in water. When intravenously administered medications were discontinued, therapy continued with oral administration of theophylline (or placebo) and of prednisone.
                Twice-daily assessments of clinical asthma symptoms were made by using a scoring system consisting of respiratory rate, inspiratory/expiratory ratio, wheeze, and accessory muscle use. Time required to reach study discharge criteria (asthma score < or = 2) (30.4 +/- 16.8 vs 27.0 +/- 10.3 hours; p = 0.51) and the rate of improvement of the clinical asthma score (-0.10 +/- 0.05 unit/hr vs -0.11 +/- 0.09 unit/hr; p = 0.88) were not significantly different between the theophylline and placebo groups. The number of albuterol aerosol treatments required and the adverse effects experienced were not significantly different between groups.
                When the combination of systemically administered corticosteroid and inhaled albuterol is used in the treatment of children hospitalized with mild to moderate asthma, addition of theophylline may not be justified. To evaluate the effects of aminophylline (Am) in children hospitalized with asthma.
                Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Subjects were children between the ages of 5 and 18 years admitted for asthma exacerbation to either a tertiary care children's hospital or an inner-city general hospital in New York. Exclusion criteria were admission to the intensive care unit, initial theophylline level > 5 micrograms/dL, or the presence of other systemic disorders. All patients received nebulized albuterol therapy and intravenous glucocorticosteroids in standardized doses. Thirty-one patients were randomized to receive either an Am bolus followed by continuous Am infusion or placebo (P) bolus and infusion. The outcome variables were: duration of hospitalization, percent of predicted peak expiratory flow rates recorded at 12-hour intervals, number of albuterol treatments required, and adverse effects.
                There were no significant differences at study entry in age, sex, race, number of previous hospital admissions, prior medications used, clinical symptom scores, or initial peak flow rates for the two groups. For 26 patients who completed this study, 15 patients in the P group were hospitalized for a mean duration of 2.33 +/- 1.3 days, whereas 11 patients in the Am group required 2.58 +/- 1.5 days. There were no significant differences between the two groups for hospital days, peak flow rates at any time interval, or amount of albuterol therapy required (P > .2). In the Am group, 6 of the 14 patients who entered the study experienced significant adverse effects consisting of nausea, emesis, headache, abdominal pain, and palpitations. Only 1 of 17 patients in the P group had an adverse effect (P < .05).
                There is no benefit and considerable risk of adverse effects associated with the use of Am in hospitalized asthmatic children. This study was conducted to determine whether intravenous theophylline, added to inhaled albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone, provides a clinically significant benefit in the treatment of pediatric status asthmaticus. Patients aged 2 to 10 years were randomized to receive either intravenous theophylline or placebo. All patients received aerosolized albuterol and intravenous methylprednisolone. There was no difference between groups in the improvement of a clinical asthma score over time, in oxygen requirement, or in the number of albuterol treatments required. Theophylline group patients experienced more nausea, emesis, and insomnia. We conclude that there is no benefit in adding theophylline to treatment with methylprednisolone and albuterol for pediatric status asthmaticus. Furthermore, there are significantly more adverse effects associated with the use of theophylline.
In children with a severe asthma exacerbation, the addition of intravenous aminophylline to ß2-agonists and glucocorticoids (with or without anticholinergics) improves lung function within 6 hours of treatment. However there is no apparent reduction in symptoms, number of nebulised treatment and length of hospital stay. There is insufficient evidence to assess the impact on oxygenation, PICU admission and mechanical ventilation. Aminophylline is associated with a significant increased risk of vomiting.