Psychogenic erectile dysfunction: comparative study of three therapeutic approaches. The potential benefit of vacuum devices augmenting psychosexual therapy for erectile dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Rational-emotive therapy in the treatment of erectile failure: an initial study. Systematic desensitization of erectile impotence: a controlled study. Intracavernosal injection therapy with and without sexological counselling in men with erectile dysfunction. Educational intervention as an adjunct to treatment of erectile dysfunction in older couples.
We administered the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF; Rosen et al., 1997) questionnaire to 30 patients with psychogenic erectile dysfunction (ED) at baseline, immediately after treatment, and 3 months after treatment. We randomized patients into three groups: group I, who had weekly sessions of time-limited theme-based group psychotherapy for 6 months and 50 mg sildenafil citrate orally on demand; group II, who had an intake of 50 mg sildenafil citrate orally on demand for 6 months only; and group III, who had weekly sessions of time-limited theme-based group psychotherapy for 6 months. We analyzed data (15-item IIEF) for each group at three times during the study and compared by the data using analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Bonferroni multiple comparison test. We used Cochran's Q-test for analysis between baseline and posttreatment stages of patients with remission of symptoms (EF equal to or higher than 26 points). Group III had a mean score higher than group II, with the difference being statistically significant (immediately after treatment, p = 0.033; at 3 months after treatment, p = 0.049; p < 0.05). All three therapeutic alternatives resulted in an improvement of erectile function domain score. However, significant differences from baseline were observed in groups I (p = 0.0009) and III (p = 0.0002) but not in group II (p = 0.135). The psychotherapy groups, I and III, had significantly higher scores compared with group II, in which patients were exclusively treated with sildenafil citrate. These findings suggest that time-limited theme-based group psychotherapy is an effective treatment for psychogenic ED. A cohort of 45 patients diagnosed with predominant psychogenic erectile disorder (ED) chose couples psychotherapy. We randomized 25 couples to also receive a vacuum constriction device (VCD), also known as a vacuum erectile device, at the second session (group 1), whereas 20 couples had psychotherapy without a VCD. Twenty-one couples (84%) in group 1 reported some improvement after the initial psychotherapy and VCD sessions compared with 12 of the 20 couples (60%) who reported some improvement after couples psychotherapy in group 2. We subsequently found that 3 of the 4 couples in group 1 reporting no improvement had not used the pump provided. Early combination treatment of couples psychotherapy and a physical treatment such as a VCD may lead to a greater beneficial response in men with ED than therapy alone. The delay of demonstrating the capacity and potential benefit from a physical intervention may have a marked effect on the initial and ongoing response to sex therapy. Sixteen males with erectile failure, married or living with their partners, were assigned to either 12 bi-weekly sessions (6 weeks) of Rational Emotive Therapy (RET) or a 6-week waiting-list control group. Active treatment administered by a graduate student in psychology with special training in RET resulted in patients making significantly more sexual intercourse attempts, reporting significantly reduced sexual anxiety, and having a significantly higher number of successful intercourse attempts than the waiting-list control group. While 6-9 month follow-up revealed that most treated patients had fallen back toward the pretest baseline (lower rates of successful intercourse), group means as a whole were still significantly higher than pretreatment intercourse success rates. The significance of these findings are discussed. Results of a study conducted to assess the therapeutic effectiveness of systematic desensitization of erectile impotence are described. Three groups of eight patients each were formed. They were treated with systematic desensitization or conventional medication and general advice, or put on a waiting list. Therapeutic effects were investigated on the behavioral, subjective, and physiological levels. There were no significant differences among the three groups except on the subjective level. On this level, after therapy the systematic desensitization group rated feelings in sexually arousing situations as associated with significantly less anxiety than the other two groups. Systematic desensitization used alone as a treatment for erectile impotence shows only limited therapeutic effect. The unimproved patients were later treated using a modification of the Masters and Johnson technique. Early results suggest that this technique may be superior to systematic desensitization alone. To compare the acceptance of and satisfaction with intracavernosal injection (ICI) therapy with and without sexological counselling in men with erectile dysfunction (ED).
                In a prospective randomized study, men were alternately assigned to ICI without sexological counselling (-SC) or with sexological counselling (+SC). In all, 70 patients were included, i.e. 35 in each group; 57 (28 -SC, 29 +SC) were interviewed by telephone after a mean follow-up of 11.3 months to determine their use of ICI and reasons for discontinuing.
                There were no differences between the groups in discontinuation of ICI (overall 30%), in reasons for discontinuing ICI (24% did so because of the return of spontaneous erections) or in sexual functioning.
                There was no positive contribution from additional sexological counselling but extensive information and support by the urologist seems to be sufficient, resulting in a high acceptance rate of ICI. The discontinuation rate (30%) is one of the lowest reported. This study examined the effects of a sex and aging workshop highlighting permission and limited information on the sexual knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and satisfaction of a group of older heterosexual couples experiencing erectile dysfunction. The workshop focused on disseminating information about the physiological and psychological changes that occur in the sexual response during the aging process. Twenty couples participated in this study: 10 attended a workshop and 10 served as controls. The study utilized a randomized control group pretest/posttest design. Workshop participants completed an evaluation form and were interviewed at the time of follow-up. Data analysis revealed that the workshop participants reported significant increases in knowledge levels and in sexual satisfaction. The workshop evaluations and follow-up interviews reinforced these quantitative results. This study lends support to educational intervention as an adjunct to treatment of erectile dysfunction in the elderly population.
There was evidence that group psychotherapy may improve erectile function. Treatment response varied between patient subgroups, but focused sex-group therapy showed greater efficacy than control group (no treatment). In a meta-analysis that compared group therapy plus sildenafil citrate versus sildenafil, men randomised to receive group therapy plus sildenafil showed significant improvement of successful intercourse, and were less likely than those receiving only sildenafil to drop out. Group psychotherapy also significantly improved ED compared to sildenafil citrate alone. Regarding the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for the treatment of ED compared to local injection, vacuum devices and other psychosocial techniques, no differences were found.