[Intra-umbilical administration of oxytocin in the treatment of retained placenta]. The effect of oxytocin injection into the umbilical vein for the management of the retained placenta. Avoiding manual removal of placenta: evaluation of intra-umbilical injection of uterotonics using the Pipingas technique for management of adherent placenta. Intraumbilical oxytocin for the management of retained placenta: a randomized controlled trial. Intraumbilical vein injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha in retained placenta. Intra-umbilical vein injection and retained placenta: evidence from a collaborative large randomised controlled trial. Grupo Argentino de Estudio de Placenta Retenida. Is there a place for intra-umbilical oxytocin for the management of retained placenta? Removing a retained placenta by oxytocin--a controlled study. Intraumbilical oxytocin for management of retained placenta. Umbilical vein administration of oxytocin for the management of retained placenta: is it effective?
nan In a single-blind study 51 patients with retention of the placenta were randomized into one of three groups: Group 1 was given 10 IU of oxytocin in 10 ml of sodium chloride into the umbilical vein; group 2 was given 10 ml of sodium chloride; group 3 was treated with manual removal of the placenta. No significant differences were recorded in groups 1 and 2, and no advantages were found in comparison with the procedure normally used. Manual removal of placenta is performed in 1-3% of cases, and whilst a well established and relatively safe procedure, it is not without complications, which include infection, hemorrhage, uterine rupture, and occasional maternal death.
                A three-arm randomized controlled trial of 50 IU Syntocinon (in 30 ml N saline) versus 800 mcg misoprostol (in 30 ml N saline) versus 30 ml N saline alone (control), injected into the placental bed via the umbilical vein using the Pipingas method. A group sequential research model (triangular test: PEST4) was adopted to minimize the sample size, as retained placenta is a relatively uncommon condition.
                No significant difference in the rate of manual removal was observed between the control and Syntocinon groups. On triggering the automatic stopping rule for this arm of the trial all subsequent cases recruited were allocated to receive either Syntocinon or misoprostol. After a total of 54 cases a significant reduction in manual removal of placenta was observed in the misoprostol group, triggering the automatic stopping rule and terminating the trial.
                Misoprostol (800 mcg) dissolved in 30 ml N saline and administered by intraumbilical injection using the Pipingas technique significantly reduces the need for manual removal for retained adherent placenta, whereas Syntocinon has similar effectiveness to injection of N saline alone. To evaluate the ability of intraumbilical oxytocin injection as a treatment for retained placenta after vaginal delivery to reduce the incidence of manual removal and postpartum hemorrhage.
                A randomized controlled trial was set up in a university and a district general hospital. We recruited 81 women with singleton pregnancies who underwent vaginal delivery and who failed to deliver the placenta after 20 minutes of active management of the third stage of labor. Study subjects were randomized to receive either 1) an intraumbilical injection of oxytocin (20 IU in 20 mL of saline); 2) an intraumbilical injection of saline (20 mL); or 3) no treatment. Outcome measures were expulsion of the placenta within 45 minutes of delivery, need for manual removal of the placenta under anesthesia, and postpartum hemorrhage (defined as a blood loss greater than 500 mL).
                Women given an intraumbilical injection of oxytocin had a significant increase in spontaneous expulsion of the placenta within 45 minutes of delivery and fewer manual removals of the placenta, compared with women without treatment (odds ratio [OR] 11.6, 99% confidence interval [CI] 1.4, 272.8; and OR 7.4, 99% CI 1.1, 86.5; respectively). When women given intraumbilical oxytocin were compared with women given only intraumbilical saline, the difference was not statistically significant (OR 6.6, 99% CI 0.9, 77.2 for spontaneous expulsion of the placenta; and OR 4.7, 99% CI 0.8, 39.5 for manual removal). There was no significant difference in the incidence of spontaneous expulsion and manual removal of the placenta between women given intraumbilical saline injection and women without treatment (OR 1.8, 99% CI 0.1, 53.9; and OR 1.6, 99% CI 0.1, 22.4; respectively).
                The results of our study suggest a clinically important beneficial effect of intraumbilical oxytocin injection in the management of retained placenta. A randomized protocol was used to study the effect of intraumbilical prostaglandin F2 alpha (Hembate, Upjohn) and oxytocin injection in women with retained placenta. Prostaglandin F2 alpha, 20 mg, diluted to 20 ml in normal saline solution (10 women, group 1), 30 IU of oxytocin, diluted to 20 ml in normal saline solution (11 women, group 2), or 20 ml of normal saline solution alone (7 women, group 3), were injected into the umbilical vein 1 h after delivery. Nine women (group 4, controls) underwent manual removal of the retained placenta. In group 1, placental expulsion occurred in all patients and the duration of the placental expulsion after prostaglandin F2 alpha injection was 6.8 +/- 1.36 (mean +/- SE) min: in group 2, six placental expulsions occurred after 13.3 +/- 1.97 min (mean +/- SE); and in group 3, no effect was recorded after intraumbilical saline injection. We suggest that intraumbilical vein injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha might be a beneficial, non-surgical method for treating retained placenta. Oxytocin might reduce the incidence of manual lysis of the placenta and achieve partial success. To determine whether intra-umbilical vein injection with saline solution, with or without oxytocin, reduces the need for manual removal of placenta compared with expectant management.
                Multicenter, randomised controlled trial.
                Eleven hospitals in four cities of Argentina: Buenos Aires, Corrientes, Rosario, and Salta.
                Two hundred and ninety-one women showing no evidence of placental separation thirty minutes after vaginal delivery.
                Three different management strategies: 1. intra-umbilical vein injection of saline solution plus oxytocin; 2. intra-umbilical vein injection of saline solution alone; and 3. expectant management.
                Primary: manual removal of the placenta. Secondary: blood loss after trial entry, haemoglobin level at 24 to 48 hours and at 40 to 45 days after delivery, blood transfusion, curettage, infection, and days of hospital stay.
                Rates of subsequent manual removal were similar: intra-umbilical vein injection of saline solution plus oxytocin (58%; RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.73-1.15), or saline alone (63%; RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.80-1.24), compared with expectant management (63%). There were also no detectable effects of the active managements on any of the secondary measures of outcome.
                Based on evidence available from randomised controlled trials, including this trial, it is unlikely that intra-umbilical injection with or without oxytocin, is clinically useful. We recommend that this intervention should not be used in third stage management of labour. Intra-umbilical injection of oxytocin has been used to hasten placental separation in retained placenta. A randomised controlled trial was done on 35 consequent women who fulfilled the criteria for retained placenta at the Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology Ipoh Hospital. Nineteen patients who were recruited into the study group received intraumbilical injection of 301U oxytocin in 27mls saline. Another 16 patients who were in the control group received 30mls of 0.9% sodium chloride (placebo). The primary outcome measured was the need for manual removal of placenta (MRP). Nine out of the 19 patients in the oxytocin group required MRP while 10/16 in the control group required MRP. There was a 24% reduction (95% C.I. 0.41 to 1.39) in the need for MRP in the study group compared to the saline group. our results indicate that intra-umbilical vein injection of oxytocin is not clinically useful for the removal of a retained placenta. No increase in maternal plasma oxytocin concentration was detected after administration of 100 IU oxytocin into the umbilical veins of seven women immediately after delivery. The delivery of the placenta was accelerated after umbilical vein injection of 100 IU oxytocin in a placebo-controlled study of 40 women: 12 minutes (4 to 40) in the oxytocin group versus 40 minutes (29 to 40) in the placebo group (median and interquartile ranges), p less than 0.05. The purpose of the study was to investigate the removal of a retained placenta.
                Oxytocin was injected into the vein of the umbilical cord. A total of 109 patients with retention of the placenta were randomized into two groups. Active management of the third stage of labor was carried out by giving oxytocin 5 IU intravenously and ergometrine maleate 0.2 mg intramuscularly after delivery of the fetus. Group 1, which comprised 68 patients, was allocated to receive 50 IU oxytocin diluted in 10 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution, and the 41 patients in group 2 were given 20 ml plasma expander (dextran 70) into the umbilical vein.
                Forty-nine cases (72%) in the oxytocin group and 22 cases (54%) in the dextran 70 group required manual removal of the retained placenta. No significant differences were found between group 1 (oxytocin) and group 2 (dextran 70).
                Our results indicate that intraumbilical vein injection of oxytocin is not effective for removal of a retained placenta. In a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 220 women with retained placenta no beneficial effects could be established of intraumbilical vein administration of 10 IU of oxytocin in 20 ml of saline solution. A reduction was not gained in the rate of manual removal of the placenta and there was no decrease in the amount of blood loss. Oxytocin only induced a minor shortening of the median time interval from administration to the spontaneous expulsion of the placenta as compared with a placebo injection. Maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein levels before and after intraumbilical vein injection did not show evidence of fetomaternal transfusion.
UVI of oxytocin solution is an inexpensive and simple intervention that could be performed while placental delivery is awaited. However, high-quality randomized trials show that the use of oxytocin has little or no effect. Further research into the optimal timing of manual removal and into UVI of prostaglandins or plasma expander is warranted.