Methadone tapering plus amantadine to detoxify heroin-dependent inpatients with or without an active cocaine use disorder: two randomised controlled trials. Amantadine may facilitate detoxification of cocaine addicts. Treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone maintenance clients: a pilot study comparing the efficacy of desipramine and amantadine. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa treatment for cocaine dependence: two double-blind, randomized, clinical trials. Contingency management and levodopa-carbidopa for cocaine treatment: a comparison of three behavioral targets. Desipramine, amantadine, or fluoxetine in buprenorphine-maintained cocaine users. Amantadine does not reduce cocaine use or craving in cocaine-dependent methadone maintenance patients. Comparison of amantadine and desipramine combined with psychotherapy for treatment of cocaine dependence. Use of dopamine agonist pergolide in outpatient treatment of cocaine dependence. Amantadine in the early treatment of cocaine dependence: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Randomized controlled pilot trial of cabergoline, hydergine and levodopa/carbidopa: Los Angeles Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST). Efficacy screening trials of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, pramipexole and venlafaxine in cocaine dependence. A screening trial of amantadine as a medication for cocaine dependence. Bromocriptine treatment for cocaine addiction: association with plasma prolactin levels. Bromocriptine for cocaine dependence. A controlled clinical trial. A double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient trial of pergolide for cocaine dependence. Double-blind comparison of bromocriptine and placebo in cocaine withdrawal. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine, propranolol, and their combination for the treatment of cocaine dependence in patients with severe cocaine withdrawal symptoms. Levodopa pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence: choosing the optimal behavioral therapy platform.
The efficacy of methadone tapering plus amantadine to detoxify heroin-dependent patients with or without an active cocaine use disorder was studied in a closed unit with two successive double-blind, placebo-controlled, 14-day trials. In the first trial, 40 heroin-dependent inpatients with an active cocaine use disorder were treated using methadone tapering, as well as amantadine (200-300 mg per day) or placebo. In the second trial, 40 heroin-dependent inpatients without an active cocaine use disorder received the same treatment. In both the trials, amantadine did not have a statistically significant effect on treatment completion, nor did it contribute, in completers, to a more rapid reduction in craving and opiate withdrawal. In the first trial, women were six times more likely than men to be non-completers, and on the last day of treatment, the first trial's completers and non-completers presented a comparable clinical state. The effectiveness of amantadine hydrochloride was evaluated in a double-blind placebo controlled drug trial. The subjects were 42 cocaine dependent men enrolled in a day hospital program. Twenty-one patients were prescribed 100 mg/bid of amantadine to be taken over 10.5 days and 21 were prescribed an equivalent amount of placebo. The primary outcome measures were the Addiction Severity Index at 1 month after study entry and urines during the drug trial (end of weeks 1 and 2) and 1 month after study entry. Urines obtained at the end of the drug trial (2 weeks) indicated that the subjects receiving amantadine (93%) were more likely (P = 0.040) to be free of cocaine than the placebo (60%) subjects. Urine toxicology data at 1-month follow-up again indicated that more of the amantadine subjects (83%) were free of cocaine than the placebo (53%) subjects (p = 0.049); although no differences were found in self-reports of cocaine or other substance use in the past 30 days. The urine findings provided preliminary indication that amantadine may have some effectiveness in reducing cocaine use in cocaine dependent patients. We conducted a pilot study (N = 22) comparing the efficacy of desipramine and amantadine for treatment of cocaine dependence in methadone maintenance clients. The study which lasted 12 weeks, was double-blind, randomly assigned, and placebo-controlled. Subjects met DSM-III-R criteria for active cocaine dependence. All three groups' cocaine use, craving, and depressive symptoms declined significantly, but intergroup differences were not significant. Clients receiving desipramine were significantly more likely to remain in treatment and to be cocaine free at study completion. The results emphasize the importance of delivering comprehensive services to the cocaine user in methadone treatment. Further evaluations of these two medications as adjuncts in the treatment of cocaine dependence are needed. The role of dopamine in cocaine abuse has been long recognized. Cocaine use can profoundly alter dopaminergic functioning through depletion of this monoamine and changes in receptor functioning. Based on these facts, levodopa (L-dopa) pharmacotherapy may be helpful in reducing or abolishing cocaine use.
                The current studies sought to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of L-dopa as a treatment for cocaine dependence.
                In Study 1, 67 cocaine-dependent subjects were randomized in a 5-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled safety trial. Subjects received either placebo, or 400 mg L-dopa plus 100 mg of the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, carbidopa, in a sustained-release preparation (Sinemet CR). In Study 2, 122 cocaine-dependent subjects were enrolled in a 9-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to compare placebo to 400/100 mg and 800/200 mg L-dopa/carbidopa treatments. Placebo or L-dopa were administered twice daily in both studies.
                L-dopa was well tolerated with similar retention and medication adherence rates compared to placebo. Only two side effects occurred more often in L-dopa-treated patients: nausea and dizziness. L-dopa lowered diastolic blood pressure in a dose-dependent fashion. In these trials, L-dopa had no effect on cocaine use, cocaine craving, or mood.
                These two studies demonstrate the safety and tolerability of L-dopa pharmacotherapy in cocaine-dependent patients. No evidence for greater efficacy of L-dopa compared to placebo was observed. The possibility of enhancing treatment effects by combining L-dopa with other behavioral or pharmacological interventions is discussed. New data support use of levodopa pharmacotherapy with behavioral contingency management (CM) as one efficacious combination in cocaine dependence disorder treatment. A potential mechanism of the combined treatment effects may be related to dopamine-induced enhancement of the saliency of contingently delivered reinforcers. Evidence to support this mechanism was sought by evaluating levodopa-enhancing effects across distinct CM conditions that varied in behavioral targets. A total of 136 treatment-seeking, cocaine dependent subjects participated in this 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of levodopa (vs. placebo) administered in combination with one of three behavioral CM conditions. In the CM-URINE condition, subjects received cash-valued vouchers contingent on cocaine-negative urine toxicology results. In the CM-ATTEND condition, the same voucher schedule was contingent on attending thrice weekly clinic visits. In the CM-MEDICATION condition, the same voucher schedule was contingent on Medication Event Monitoring Systems- and riboflavin-based evidence of pill-taking behavior. Primary outcomes associated with each CM target behavior were analyzed using generalized linear mixed models for repeated outcomes. CM responding in the CM-ATTEND and CM-MEDICATION conditions showed orderly effects, with each condition producing corresponding changes in targeted behaviors, regardless of medication condition. In contrast, CM responding in the CM-URINE condition was moderated by medication, with levodopa-treated subjects more likely to submit cocaine-negative urines. These findings specify the optimal target behavior for CM when used in combination with levodopa pharmacotherapy. The clinical efficacy of promising cocaine anti-craving medications was examined in combination with buprenorphine. Twenty-one opioid-dependent cocaine abusers were enrolled in a double-blind, 12-week trial in which they received on a daily basis buprenorphine (8 mg, s.l.) plus either desipramine (150 mg, p.o.), amantadine (300 mg, p.o.), or fluoxetine (60 mg, p.o.). Urine samples and self-reported drug use were obtained 1-3 times/week. The order of greatest patient retention across the 12 weeks was desipramine (83.3%) > amantadine (66.7%) > fluoxetine (20.0%). The desipramine and amantadine groups appeared to have greater increases in opioid- and cocaine-free urines than the fluoxetine group. These results suggest that desipramine and amantadine may facilitate greater opioid and cocaine abstinence than fluoxetine. We tested the efficacy of amantadine to reduce cocaine use or craving in cocaine-dependent methadone maintained patients. Two doses of amantadine (200 mg p.o. daily, n = 16, and 200 mg p.o. bid, n = 21) were tested against placebo, n = 22, in a random assignment, double-blind clinical trial lasting nine weeks. Amantadine was well tolerated. However, neither dose of amantadine was more effective than placebo in reducing cocaine use and craving. We conducted a single-blind, random assignment, placebo-controlled, 12-week comparison of desipramine hydrochloride and amantadine hydrochloride as adjunctive treatments to counseling for cocaine dependence. Subjects were 54 outpatients who met DSM III-R criteria for active cocaine dependence and who completed a minimum of 2 weeks of treatment. Subjects treated with fixed doses of 200 mg/day desipramine (N = 17), 400 mg/day amantadine-placebo (N = 16), and placebo (N = 21) did not differ for lifetime cocaine use, lifetime histories of psychopathology, admission scores on psychometric assessments, and sociodemographics. All treatment groups demonstrated dramatic and persistent decreases in cocaine use, craving for cocaine, and psychiatric symptoms consequent to treatment. Although there was a trend for more dropouts by subjects taking desipramine, there were no significant differences among treatment groups regarding retention in treatment, craving for cocaine, and decreased cocaine use confirmed by urine toxicology. There was a trend for subjects treated with desipramine to maintain longer periods of cocaine abstinence. Mean plasma concentration of desipramine in a subsample of our subjects was less than that recommended for treatment of depression, thus the dosage of desipramine may have been subtherapeutic. The dopamine agonist pergolide was evaluated in the treatment of 42 men who manifested cocaine dependence in a single-blind, 4-week-long placebo-controlled study, during 1998-1999 in São Paulo, Brazil. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the first group received pergolide (0.05-0.2 mg per day) and the second group received placebo (one to four tablets per day). Urine toxicology screens were obtained. The groups were compared in terms of depressive symptoms, "craving," use of cocaine, side effects of medications, results of urine tests, and retention in treatment. At 3 months' follow-up, the participants were reassessed. No differences were found between the two groups. A 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine was conducted in 61 cocaine dependent outpatients. Subjects received 100 mg of amantadine 3 times daily. A follow-up visit was conducted at week 8. There were no significant differences between groups in treatment retention, or in the number of benzoylecgonine positive urine samples. Self-reported drug and alcohol use declined in both groups. At week 8 follow-up, self-reported drug use was significantly lower in the placebo group. Amantadine was not effective, and discontinuation of it may have been associated with an increase in cocaine use. This study tested three dopaminergic medications against a common unmatched placebo condition: hydergine 1 mg three times daily (n = 15); levodopa/carbidopa 25/100 mg three times daily (n = 15); cabergoline 0.5 mg per week (n = 15); and placebo three times daily (n = 15) as potential pharmacotherapies for cocaine dependence.
                The four-parallel group, Cocaine Rapid Efficacy Screening Trial (CREST) design featured a 2-week baseline period followed by randomization to an 8-week medication condition that included 1 hour per week of cognitive behavioral drug counseling. A safety evaluation was conducted 4 weeks after termination.
                Outcomes included cocaine metabolites measured in urine, retention and self-reports for drug use, cocaine craving, clinical improvement, mood and HIV risk behaviors.
                Participants assigned to receive cabergoline provided more urine samples negative for cocaine metabolites (42.4%) than those assigned to receive placebo (25.0%), a statistically significant difference after controlling for baseline differences in self-reported cocaine use (F = 2.95, df = 3; P = 0.05). Cabergoline-treated participants demonstrated a significant improvement over placebo from baseline to week 8 when measured using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) employment subscale (overall change = - 0.09, SD = 0.10, t = 2.36, P < 0.05). Safety and adverse event measures showed similar rates and types of complaints by treatment condition.
                These results, combined with the apparent safety of cabergoline when used with this population, provide empirical support for conducting a larger study of the medication. The two studies presented here were conducted to assess the efficacy of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine and pramipexole as medications for the treatment of cocaine dependence.
                A multi-arm, modified blinded, placebo-controlled design was used.
                The studies were conducted at the Boston VA Healthcare System and the Boston University School of Medicine Medication Development Research Unit (MDRU).
                Participants met criteria for cocaine dependence during a 2-week screening period.
                Following random assignment to one of the treatment groups, subjects received active medication or placebo for 8 weeks in combination with cognitive behavioral counseling. In the first study the efficacy of the antidepressant paroxetine (20 mg daily), the phosphodiesterase inhibitor pentoxifylline (1200 mg daily) and the glutamate release inhibitor riluzole (100 mg daily) was assessed. The antidepressant venlafaxine (150 mg daily) and the dopamine agonist pramipexole (1.5 mg daily) were evaluated in the second study.
                Urine benzoylecgonine (BE) concentrations, self-report of cocaine use and global impression scores served as primary outcome measures. Secondary measures included assessments of cocaine craving and psychiatric functioning. Adverse events were monitored during the treatment period.
                None of the active medications produced greater reductions in urine BE concentrations over the treatment period than did placebo. There were trends for BE levels to become reduced in the pentoxifylline group during the first 4 weeks of treatment and for Addiction Severity Index (ASI) drug composite scores to be lower in the pentoxyfylline group at end-point compared to the placebo group. Significant within-group reductions in reported cocaine use and craving were found for all treatment groups, but none of the active medications were superior to placebo on these measures. The accuracy of self-reported cocaine use declined over the study period. Overall, the active medications were well tolerated.
                This study does not support the use of paroxetine, pentoxifylline, riluzole, venlafaxine or pramipexole for the treatment of cocaine dependence. However, these results need to be interpreted with caution because of the small size and lack of homogeneity of the experimental groups. This screening trial evaluated whether amantadine hydrochloride (100 mg bid) demonstrated sufficient clinical efficacy compared to placebo to recommend development as a pharmacotherapy for cocaine dependence. Participants were randomized to amantadine (n=34) or placebo (n=35) conditions in a 16-week, placebo-controlled, double blind trial with three times per week group counseling. Amantadine-treated participants were retained significantly longer than placebo. Based on results of a joint probability index for urine drug testing results (i.e. the proportion of cocaine-metabolite free urine samples divided by the number of participants assigned to the condition), participants assigned to amantadine were found to be significantly more likely to be cocaine abstinent on the last day of 8-weeks of treatment than participants assigned to placebo. Results at the end of 16 weeks of treatment were similar. Standard measures of urine drug testing consistently favored the amantadine condition over placebo, although not at levels of statistical significance. There was no statistical significance infrequency or severity of reported adverse events by treatment condition. Participants assigned to amantadine exhibited greater reductions in global staff ratings of cocaine dependence severity from baseline to termination compared with placebo. There were no significant differences in frequency or severity of reported adverse events by treatment condition. These results provide moderate support for further study of amantadine for the treatment of cocaine dependence. Bromocriptine is a dopamine receptor agonist used with mixed success in the treatment of cocaine addiction. Variations in dopamine receptor sensitivity may help account for these differences. We evaluated this question in a 24-week outpatient controlled clinical trial in 70 cocaine-abusing (DSM-III) men (86% African-American, mean age 34 years, mean 39 months of regular cocaine use [predominantly smoked]). Subjects received 4 weeks of inpatient treatment. During the last 2 weeks they were inducted onto bromocriptine (maximum dose 2.5mg po tid) (n=35) or placebo (n=35). Plasma prolactin concentrations were assayed before and after the first bromocriptine dose (1.25mg po) as a measure of dopamine receptor sensitivity. After discharge, subjects continued on medication with weekly group counseling. Bromocriptine significantly suppressed prolactin concentrations (4.4 ng/ml decrease), while placebo did not (0.1 ng/ml decrease). Both groups decreased their cocaine use, with no significant group differences in retention in treatment or proportion of cocaine-positive urine samples. There was no significant association between basal plasma prolactin concentrations or prolactin response to first bromocriptine dose and either outcome measure. These data do not support the efficacy of bromocriptine treatment nor a role for prolactin concentration in predicting treatment response. On the basis of the dopamine depletion theory, bromocriptine has been tested to treat cocaine withdrawal and dependence. The authors conducted a 6-week study with 1 week of pretreatment observation and 5 weeks of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of bromocriptine for DSM-III-R-defined cocaine dependence in methadone-maintained male patients. The bromocriptine group (n = 24) did not differ from the placebo group (n = 26) in self-reported cocaine use, proportion of positive urine toxicology samples, craving for cocaine, resistance to cocaine use, or mood symptoms between the pretreatment baseline and the last week of the clinical trial. Both groups showed significant reduction in self-reported frequency of cocaine use, resistance to craving, and mood symptoms during participation in the protocol. The results of this study are consistent with recent clinical and laboratory findings in primary cocaine users. Despite initially promising pilot studies, recent evidence does not support the efficacy of bromocriptine to reduce cocaine use or craving. Results of preclinical studies suggest that pergolide, a mixed D(1)/D(2) dopamine receptor agonist, may be useful in treating cocaine dependence. To empirically investigate this possibility, we conducted a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of two doses of pergolide (0.05 and 0.25 mg bid) in subjects with cocaine dependence and combined cocaine/alcohol dependence. Data analysis was performed on an intent to treat population (N=358) and a per protocol population (N=108) with urine drug screens (UDS) used as the main outcome measure. There were no significant effects on UDS at either pergolide dose. Pergolide had no significant effect on alcohol use in the comorbid alcohol/cocaine dependence group. Pergolide does not appear to have clinical value in the treatment of cocaine dependence or in decreasing alcohol use in cocaine-dependent individuals at the presently studied doses. Twenty-nine cocaine-dependent male veterans without other drug dependence completed a double-blind controlled, randomly-assigned study examining the efficacy of bromocriptine versus placebo in the management of cocaine abstinence symptomatology. Serum prolactin (PL) and growth hormone (GH) levels were obtained prior to and after the study was completed. Patients were seen daily and completed several self-report questionnaires, including the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised, the Beck Depression Inventory, and a Cocaine Craving Report. The patients were also asked to rate a variety of cocaine withdrawal symptoms. Overall, there did not appear to be any advantage to receiving bromocriptine versus placebo during the first 3 weeks following cocaine use cessation with the possible exception of changes in activity and appetite level. The placebo group showed a statistically significant increase in activity level during the first week in treatment and a significant increase in appetite throughout the study. Patients in both groups showed significant improvement in the other areas assessed, with improvement appearing to progress according to length of treatment. Hyperprolactinemia or abnormal GH levels were not found in this patient sample as a group. Thirty-four of the original 63 patients dropped out of the study. Seventeen received bromocriptine, and 17 received placebo. There was no significant difference between drug groups in incidence of retaining patients in treatment. The high dropout rate may reflect the difficulty incurred in retaining cocaine-dependent patients in treatment. This trial evaluated the efficacy of amantadine, propranolol and their combination in cocaine dependent patients with severe cocaine withdrawal symptoms.
                Cocaine withdrawal symptom severity was measured by the cocaine selective severity assessment (CSSA). One hundred and ninety-nine patients with high scores on the CSSA participated in a 10-week double-blind trial. Patients were randomly assigned to receive amantadine (300 mg/day), propranolol (100mg/day), a combination of amantadine (300 mg/day) and propranolol (100mg/day) or matching placebo capsules. The primary outcome measure was cocaine abstinence.
                In the intent-to-treat sample, there were no significant differences between the four medication groups in treatment retention. The odds of cocaine abstinence showed a marginally significant increase over time in the propranolol group (p=0.06) but not in the other three groups. In highly medication-adherent patients, treatment retention was significantly better in the propranolol group compared to the placebo group (p=0.01) and the odds of cocaine abstinence increased significantly over time in the propranolol group but not in the other three groups.
                In the intent-to-treat sample, none of the three active treatments (propranolol, amantadine or their combination) was significantly more effective than placebo in promoting abstinence from cocaine among patients who entered treatment with more severe cocaine withdrawal symptoms. Among patients highly adherent to study medication, propranolol treatment was associated with better treatment retention and higher rates of cocaine abstinence compared to placebo. The dopamine precursor levodopa has shown some, albeit relatively weak, promise in treating cocaine dependence. This study sought to identify the most appropriate behavioral therapy platform for levodopa pharmacotherapy by evaluating its effect when administered in combination with behavioral platforms of varying intensities.
                A total of 161 treatment-seeking cocaine dependent subjects received sustained release levodopa/carbidopa (400/100mg bid, Sinemet) or placebo delivered in combination with Clinical Management (ClinMan); ClinMan+cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); or ClinMan+CBT+voucher-based reinforcement therapy (VBRT) in a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind (for medication condition) trial. Medication compliance was monitored with riboflavin (100mg/capsule) and the Medication Event Monitoring System. Protocol compliance was addressed in weekly, 10-min nurse-delivered ClinMan sessions. Weekly, 1-h CBT sessions focused on coping skills training. VBRT (with escalating reinforcer value) provided cash-valued vouchers contingent on cocaine-negative urine toxicology results. Urine benzoylecgonine assays collected thrice-weekly were analyzed by intention-to-treat criteria using generalized linear mixed models.
                Levodopa main effects were found on all outcome measures of cocaine use. Contrasts testing the levodopa-placebo difference within each behavioral platform found reliable effects, favoring levodopa, only in the VBRT platform. Levodopa treatment with vouchers produced higher proportions of cocaine-negative urines and longer periods of consecutive abstinence compared to other treatment combinations.
                This is the first study to find a significant treatment effect for levodopa and, in doing so, to demonstrate that the magnitude of this effect is dependent upon conditions of the behavioral therapy platform. The data support use of levodopa with abstinence-based reinforcement therapy as one efficacious combination in cocaine dependence disorder treatment.
Current evidence from randomised controlled trials does not support the use of dopamine agonists for treating cocaine dependence. This absence of evidence may leave to clinicians the alternative of balancing the possible benefits against the potential adverse effects of the treatment.Even the potential benefit of combining a dopamine agonist with a more potent psychosocial intervention which was suggested by the previous Cochrane review (Soares 2003), is not supported by the results of this updated review.