Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 International Study Group. CMV infections after two doses of daclizumab versus thymoglobulin in renal transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil, steroids and delayed cyclosporine A. Multicenter, randomized study of the effectiveness of basiliximab in avoiding addition of steroids to cyclosporine a monotherapy in renal transplant recipients. Steroid avoidance in renal transplantation using basiliximab induction, cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and protocol biopsies. Randomized controlled trial of a monoclonal antibody against the interleukin-2 receptor (33B3.1) as compared with rabbit antithymocyte globulin for prophylaxis against rejection of renal allografts. Correlation between oxidative stress and immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant recipients with an uneventful postoperative course and stable renal function. B-cell-depleting induction therapy and acute cellular rejection. Two-dose basiliximab compared with two-dose daclizumab in renal transplantation: a clinical study. A prospective, randomized, multicenter trial of tacrolimus-based therapy with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation. Rabbit antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab in renal transplantation. High rejection rate during calcineurin inhibitor-free and early steroid withdrawal immunosuppression in renal transplantation. Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal graft recipients. Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab compared with antithymocyte globulin in renal transplant patients receiving MMF-containing triple therapy. [Cytokines and growth factors serum level and renal allograft function (preliminary report)]. Reduction of the occurrence of acute cellular rejection among renal allograft recipients treated with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2-receptor monoclonal antibody. United States Simulect Renal Study Group. ATG versus basiliximab induction therapy in renal allograft recipients receiving a dual immunosuppressive regimen: one-year results. Calcineurin inhibitor avoidance with daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone in DR-matched de novo kidney transplant recipients. Randomized controlled study comparing reduced calcineurin inhibitors exposure versus standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Early experience with anti-Tac in clinical renal transplantation. A randomized trial of three renal transplant induction antibodies: early comparison of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid dosing, and newer immune-monitoring. Randomised trial of simulect versus placebo for control of acute rejection in renal allograft recipients. Tacrolimus-Basiliximab versus Cyclosporine-Basiliximab in renal transplantation "de novo": acute rejection and complications. Single bolus antithymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation with cyclosporine triple immunosuppression: efficacy and safety. A single-dose daclizumab induction protocol in renal allograft recipients: a Chinese single center experience. Sequential protocols using basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulins in renal-transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Randomized double-blind study of immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, in combination with mycophenolate mofetil-containing triple therapy in renal transplantation. Low rate of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients with basiliximab. Reduction of acute renal allograft rejection by daclizumab. Daclizumab Double Therapy Study Group. A randomized, double-blind trial of basiliximab immunoprophylaxis plus triple therapy in kidney transplant recipients. Limited dose monoclonal IL-2R antibody induction protocol after primary kidney transplantation. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of monoclonal anti-interleukin-2 receptor antibody (BT563) administration to prevent acute rejection after kidney transplantation. Interleukin-2-receptor blockade with daclizumab to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation. Daclizumab Triple Therapy Study Group. Basiliximab (Simulect) reduces acute rejection among sensitized kidney allograft recipients. Basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulin for prevention of acute renal allograft rejection. Reduced exposure to calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation. Prevention of acute rejection episodes with an anti-interleukin 2 receptor monoclonal antibody. II. Results after a second kidney transplantation. Clinical rejection and persistent immune regulation in kidney transplant patients. Prophylactic use of the anti-IL-2 receptor monoclonal antibody LO-Tact-1 in cadaveric renal transplantation: results of a randomized study. Basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute cellular rejection in live-related-donor kidney transplantation: a three-year prospective randomized trial. Safety and efficacy of an alternative basiliximab (Simulect) regimen after renal transplantation: administration of a single 40-mg dose on the first postoperative day in patients receiving triple therapy with azathioprine. Induction immunosuppression with interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (basiliximab and daclizumab) in renal transplant recipients. Two corticosteroid-free regimens-tacrolimus monotherapy after basiliximab administration and tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil-in comparison with a standard triple regimen in renal transplantation: results of the Atlas study. Daclizumab versus antithymocyte globulin in high-immunological-risk renal transplant recipients. Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation. ATG-Fresenius or daclizumab induction therapy in immunologically high risk kidney recipients: a prospective randomized pilot trial. Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and daclizumab induction in renal transplantation. Randomized clinical trial of daclizumab induction and delayed introduction of tacrolimus for recipients of non-heart-beating kidney transplants. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of one or two doses of daclizumab in renal transplantation. A randomized prospective trial of anti-Tac monoclonal antibody in human renal transplantation. Efficacy and safety of basiliximab in pediatric renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Zenapax versus OKT-3 prophylaxis in immunologically high-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Currently available immunosuppressive regimens for cadaver-kidney recipients are far from ideal because acute-rejection episodes occur in about 30% to 50% of these patients. In the phase III study described here we assessed the ability of basiliximab, a chimeric interleukin (IL)-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, to prevent acute-rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients.
                380 adult recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney transplant were randomly allocated, in this double-blind trial, to receive a 20 mg infusion of basiliximab on day 0 (day of surgery) and on day 4, to provide IL-2-receptor suppression for 4-6 weeks (n=193), or to receive placebo (n=187). Both groups received baseline dual immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporin and steroids throughout the study. The primary outcome measure was incidence of acute-rejection episodes during the 6 months after transplantation. Safety and tolerability were monitored over the 12 months of the study.
                376 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis (basiliximab, n=190; placebo, n=186). No significant differences in patient characteristics were apparent. The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection 6 months after transplantation was 51 (29.8%) of 171 in the basiliximab group compared with 73 (44.0%) of 166 in the placebo group (32% reduction; 14.2% difference [95% Kaplan-Meier CIs 3% to 24%], p=0.012). The incidence of steroid-resistant first rejection episodes that required antibody therapy was significantly lower in the basiliximab group (10% vs 23.1%, 13.1% difference [5.4% to 20.8%], p<0.001). At weeks 2 and 4 post-transplantation, the mean daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the placebo group (p<0.001 with one-way analysis of variance). The incidence of graft loss at 12 months post-transplantation was 23 (12.1%) of 190 in the basiliximab group and 25 (13.4%) of 186 in the placebo group (1.3% difference [-5% to 9%], p=0.591). The incidence of infection and other adverse events was similar in the two treatment groups. The acute tolerability of basiliximab was excellent, with no evidence of cytokine-release syndrome. 14 deaths (basiliximab n=9; placebo n=5; -2.0% difference [-6% to 2%], p=0.293) occurred during the 12-month study and a further three deaths (basiliximab n=1; placebo n=2) occurred within the 380-day cut-off period. One post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorder was recorded in each group.
                Prophylaxis with 40 mg basiliximab reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes significantly, with no clinically relevant safety or tolerability concerns. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major complication after renal transplantation and is involved in graft rejection. The anti-interleukin-2-receptor antibody daclizumab reduces the incidence of acute rejection without increasing the incidence of CMV infection.
                This multicentre, randomized trial compared safety and efficacy, at 1 year, of two doses of daclizumab (54 patients, group D) with thymoglobulin (55 patients, group T) plus delayed cyclosporine (CsA), MMF (mycophenolate mofetil) and steroids in first cadaver kidney transplant patients. Primary criterion was CMV infection/syndrome/disease. D+/R- patients received oral ganciclovir prophylaxis for 90 days.
                Status for CMV was identical in the both groups. The incidence of CMV infection/syndrome/disease was 39% in group D versus 51% in group T (NS). Time to onset of CMV replication was delayed in group D (P = 0.015) and mean number of pp65-positive cells was lower at 4 and 6 months (P < 0.001). Incidence of symptomatic CMV episodes was not reduced in whole group D (5.6% versus 16.4%, NS), but lower in D+/R+ and D-/R+ patients without chemoprophylaxis, compared to group T (2.8% versus 21.6%, P = 0.028). Patient and graft survivals and incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection were identical.
                Limited dosing regimen of daclizumab with MMF, steroids and delayed CsA introduction was safe and effective. The incidence of CMV infection was not significantly different, but without chemoprophylaxis, clinical manifestations and viral replication were reduced with this regimen. Steroid therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and well-documented adverse effects, but two thirds of patients initiated on monotherapy with cyclosporine A (CsA) microemulsion require addition of steroids.
                In this 12-month randomized, double-blind, multicenter study, 108 renal transplant recipients were randomized and received basiliximab (n=52) or placebo (n=56) to assess whether basiliximab reduces the need for addition of steroids or other adjunctive immunosuppressive drugs to CsA monotherapy.
                The primary endpoint of the study (requirement for additional immunosuppression at 12 months posttransplant) occurred significantly less frequently with basiliximab (54%) than placebo (73%) (P=0.046). By the end of the study, 25% of basiliximab-treated patients were receiving maintenance steroids versus 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.0006). During the trial, 33% of basiliximab-treated patients received oral steroids at some time compared with 61% of placebo-treated patients (P=0.004). The proportion of patients experiencing biopsy-proven rejection was not significantly different between the basiliximab (29%) and placebo (43%) groups (P=0.16). Median serum creatinine at 12 months was 141 mumol/L with basiliximab and 164 mumol/L with placebo (not significant). One-year graft and patient survivals were 88% and 98% for basiliximab and 88% and 96% for placebo (not significant), respectively. Adverse events were similar in the basiliximab and placebo treatment groups.
                These findings demonstrate that the addition of basiliximab significantly reduces the need to modify the initial treatment regimen in patients scheduled to receive steroid-free CsA therapy, suggesting that basiliximab induction may be useful as a strategy in other steroid-avoidance regimens. Reducing chronic steroid exposure is important to minimize steroid-related morbidity, particularly for susceptible renal transplant recipients. Steroid-free and steroid-sparing protocols have shown benefits, but safety has not been established for all populations. We investigated the safety of steroid avoidance (SA) in a population including African-Americans, using modern immunosuppression with protocol biopsy monitoring.
                A randomized-controlled SA trial (early discontinuation, days 2-7) was conducted in a population (n = 77) including African-Americans and cadaveric kidney recipients. Patients received basiliximab, cyclosporine (CsA), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). In controls, steroids were tapered to 5 mg prednisone/d by day 30. Protocol biopsies were performed (1, 6, 12 and 24 months) to evaluate subclinical acute rejection (SCAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).
                The SA did not result in significantly higher incidences of graft loss, AR, SCAR, CAN, or renal fibrosis. SA patients experienced similar renal function, comparable serum lipid levels, and a trend toward fewer cases of new-onset diabetes. Clinical outcomes of African-American and non-African-American patients did not significantly differ.
                The SA is safe in the context of basiliximab induction and CsA-based immunosuppression. This protocol could minimize steroid-related side effects in susceptible groups, including African-Americans, without increasing the risk of AR or graft failure. Interleukin-2 is a major growth factor for activated T lymphocytes, and antibodies reacting with the Tac-chain component of the interleukin-2 receptor can prevent allograft rejection in animals. Because Tac chains are expressed only on a small fraction of activated lymphocytes, monoclonal antibodies against the interleukin-2 receptor may offer a more specific means of immunosuppression than polyclonal antilymphocyte globulin in prophylaxis against graft rejection. Therefore, we compared the immunosuppressive effect of 33B3.1, a rat monoclonal antibody against the human Tac chain, with the effect of a rabbit polyclonal antithymocyte globulin in a randomized study of 100 recipients of first renal transplants. Injections of 33B3.1 (10 mg per day) were tolerated well, whereas major side effects in 15 of 47 patients (32 percent) receiving antithymocyte globulin required discontinuation of treatment before day 14. The incidence of rejection episodes was not statistically different in the two groups at days 14, 30, 60, and 90 after transplantation. Patient and graft survival was also equal in the two groups at one year (96 and 85 percent, respectively, in both groups), and graft function was similar. The total number of infectious episodes within the first three months was lower in the 33B3.1 group than in the antithymocyte group (47 vs. 72). The drop in peripheral-blood lymphocyte concentrations was significantly larger in the patients treated with antithymocyte globulin. The level of circulating Tac-chain-bearing lymphocytes remained below 1 percent during 33B3.1 treatment, as compared with 4 to 5 percent during antithymocyte-globulin treatment (P not significant). We conclude that 33B3.1 is as effective as antithymocyte globulin in the prevention of renal-transplant rejection, and its use results in fewer infections and side effects. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are important mediators of cellular damage and lipid peroxidation is the most important expression of ROS-induced oxidative stress. Recent studies have suggested that increased plasma malondialdehyde (MDA) levels are a consequence of specific immunosuppressive therapies. This study aims at investigating the relation between oxidative stress and immunosuppressive therapies in renal transplant patients with stable renal function and uneventful postoperative course.
                The study group included 26 renal patients. Two groups of renal transplant recipients, treated with a different combination of immunosuppressive agents were studied (Group A: CyA, MMF, Steroids and Basiliximab, Group B: Tacrolimus, MMF, Steroids and Daclizumab). All patients had an uneventful postoperative course. Plasma MDA levels were measured before transplantation, 1 and 6 months after. Plasma concentration of endogenous creatinine (Cr) was used as a measure of stable renal function.
                Levels of MDA were increased before the transplantation in all renal patients (MDA: 7.81 +/- 4.81, normal levels: 2.23-4.08 nmol/ml, P < 0.05). Combined therapy with CyA was associated with high values of MDA at 6 months measurement after transplantation. However this tendency of increased MDA levels did not achieve a statistical significance (Group A: 6.97 vs. 9.06 nmol/ml, P>0.05). On the contrary, statistically significant diminution of MDA levels was observed in Group B patients (Tacrolimus-MMF-steroids) at 6 months measurement after transplantation. (Group B: 8.61 vs. 4.11 nmol/ml, P<0.02<0.05).
                Immunosuppressive combined therapy with CyA was associated with the high values of MDA that were measured posttransplantly. Our study provides strong evidence that Tacrolimus is significantly associated with improved free radical metabolism. nan Addition of the interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antagonists basiliximab or daclizumab to a calcineurin inhibitor-based regimen significantly reduces risk of acute rejection with a tolerability profile similar to a placebo. Use of a truncated two-dose regimen of daclizumab has been reported, but till date, there has been no controlled study of two-dose daclizumab vs. two-dose basiliximab.
                Deceased-donor renal transplant recipients were randomized to basiliximab (20 mg on days 0 and 4) or daclizumab (50 mg on days 1 and 14) with cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. Flow cytometry was used to calculate the proportion of CD25(+) T cells in peripheral blood.
                Thirty patients were randomized to basiliximab and 28 to daclizumab. There was one patient death in each group, with no other graft losses. By six months, the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 0% with basiliximab vs. 21.4% with daclizumab (p < 0.05). Three patients in the daclizumab group required OKT3 for steroid-resistant rejection. There were no between-group differences in the incidence of infection. The proportion of CD25(+) T cells declined markedly during the first two wk in both groups, but was significantly lower in the basiliximab group during weeks six to eight.
                Two doses of basiliximab are more effective than two 1 mg/kg doses of daclizumab in preventing acute rejection in de novo renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroid maintenance therapy. In patients receiving relatively low-level immunosuppression in order to minimize toxicity, basiliximab may be preferable to a truncated daclizumab regimen. In a 6-month, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel-group trial, we investigated the efficacy and safety of adding basiliximab to a standard tacrolimus-based regimen in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Patients < 18 years received tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids (TAS, n = 93) or tacrolimus/azathioprine/steroids/basiliximab (TAS + B, n = 99). Target tacrolimus levels were 10-20 ng/mL between days 0-21 and 5-15 ng/mL thereafter. Steroid dosing was identical in both groups. Basiliximab was administered at 10 mg (patients < 40 kg) or 20 mg (patients > or = 40 kg) within 4 h of reperfusion; the same dose was repeated on day 4. Biopsy-proven acute rejection rates were 20.4% (TAS) and 19.2% (TAS + B); steroid-resistant acute rejection rates were 3.2% and 3.0%, respectively. Patient survival was 100%; graft survival rates were 95% in both arms. The nature and incidence of adverse events were similar in both arms except toxic nephropathy and abdominal pain, which were significantly higher in the TAS + B arm (14.1% vs. 4.3%; p = 0.03 and 11.1% vs. 2.2%; p = 0.02; respectively). Median serum creatinine concentrations at 6 months were 86 micromol/L in the TAS and 91 micromol/L in the TAS + B arm; glomerular filtration rate was 79.4 and 77.6 (mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Adding basiliximab to a tacrolimus-based regimen is safe in pediatric patients, but does not improve clinical efficacy. Induction therapy reduces the frequency of acute rejection and delayed graft function after transplantation. A rabbit antithymocyte polyclonal antibody or basiliximab, an interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, is most commonly used for induction.
                In this prospective, randomized, international study, we compared short courses of antithymocyte globulin and basiliximab in patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor. Patients taking cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone were randomly assigned to receive either rabbit antithymocyte globulin (1.5 mg per kilogram of body weight daily, 141 patients) during transplantation (day 0) and on days 1 through 4 or basiliximab (20 mg, 137 patients) on days 0 and 4. The primary end point was a composite of acute rejection, delayed graft function, graft loss, and death.
                At 12 months, the incidence of the composite end point was similar in the two groups (P=0.34). The antithymocyte globulin group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had lower incidences of acute rejection (15.6% vs. 25.5%, P=0.02) and of acute rejection that required treatment with antibody (1.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.005). The antithymocyte globulin group and the basiliximab group had similar incidences of graft loss (9.2% and 10.2%, respectively), delayed graft function (40.4% and 44.5%), and death (4.3% and 4.4%). Though the incidences of all adverse events, serious adverse events, and cancers were also similar between the two groups, patients receiving antithymocyte globulin had a greater incidence of infection (85.8% vs. 75.2%, P=0.03) but a lower incidence of cytomegalovirus disease (7.8% vs. 17.5%, P=0.02).
                Among patients at high risk for acute rejection or delayed graft function who received a renal transplant from a deceased donor, induction therapy consisting of a 5-day course of antithymocyte globulin, as compared with basiliximab, reduced the incidence and severity of acute rejection but not the incidence of delayed graft function. Patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00235300 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. Morbidity and mortality due to cardiovascular disease are major problems after renal transplantation. The effects of three immunosuppressive protocols on cardiovascular end points were investigated in a single-center, randomized, parallel (1-1-1) group. Acute rejection was a secondary safety endpoint. Groups were as follows: group one, tacrolimus+sirolimus; group two, tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); group three, sirolimus+MMF+daclizumab. All groups received two days methylprednisolone only. The Ethical Committee demanded an interim analysis when 50% of the patients were included. In this analysis, 54 patients with a median follow-up of 9.2 months were studied. The Kaplan-Meyer analysis showed a difference in rejection free survival between group one (82%) and group three (34%, P=0.03) and between groups one and two (tacrolimus-based, 76%) and group three (calcineurin-free, 34%, P=0.04). Calcineurin-free immunosuppression with two days of steroids only showed an unacceptable high incidence of acute rejection and re-rejection, and the study had to be stopped. In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation. Acute graft rejection remains a major problem in renal transplant recipients, and there is no consensus on the optimal immunosuppressive strategy. Immunoprophylaxis with Thymoglobulin or basiliximab has significantly reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes and graft loss following kidney transplantation. This open, randomized, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and tolerability of basiliximab (20mg day 0-day 4) plus early cyclosporine from day 0 (n = 50) compared with Thymoglobulin plus delayed cyclosporine (n = 50) in adult kidney transplant patients. In addition, all patients received steroids and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) at standard doses from day 0. Patient and graft survival rates at 12 months were 98 and 94% in the basiliximab group, respectively, compared with 100 and 96% in the Thymoglobulin' group. The incidences of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (8.0% in each group) and treatment failure (14% in the basiliximab group vs. 8% in the Thymoglobulin group) were comparable in the two groups. There was a non-significant tendency to more dialysis (14 vs. 6%), and fewer cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections (p = 0.005) in the basiliximab group, but the percentage of clinical CMV was not different between the two groups (6 vs. 12%). Both strategies give excellent results, despite the differences in patterns, in nonhyperimmunized patients receiving their first cadaveric renal allograft. Long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, subclinical rejections are risk factors of chronic allograft nephropathy. In a prospective, randomized study 44 pts. were randomized either to a reduced dose of CyA and daclizumab (group A, n = 22) or to a normal dose of CyA without daclizumab (group B, n = 22). Both groups were treated with MMF and prednisone. Number of rejection episodes was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were renal function; histological parameters related to CyA; serum level of TGF-beta, PDGF-BB, blockade of CD25 molecule and surface expression of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD69, CD11a, CD49d, CD28, CD152 molecules in the subpopulations of T cells in the peripheral blood. A low incidence of clinically suspected rejection episodes were observed (19% in group A and 12.4% in group B; NS). The protocol biopsies at 3 month emerged 7 subclinical rejection episodes (4 in group A and 3 in group B). Serum creatinine level did not differ between examined groups. Chronic histopathologic changes related to CyA progressed significantly at the 3 month biopsies in both groups (with no differences between groups). Serum TGF-beta, PDGF did not differ between groups. Expression of CD25, CD152 molecule was significantly lower in group A than in group B. Immunosuppression regiment with low CyA dose with daclizumab, MMF, prednisone seems to be efficient and safe in low-risk rejection kidney allograft recipients. A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study was performed to assess whether basiliximab, a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduced the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients.
                A total of 348 patients were randomized into two demographically matched, equally sized groups treated with either basiliximab or placebo. The dose of basiliximab-20-mg infusions on day 0 and day 4-was selected to block detection of interleukin-2 receptor on 97% of peripheral blood lymphocytes for 30-45 days. All patients received immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of posttransplant acute rejection episodes, patient and graft survival rates, and the safety and tolerability of basiliximab.
                Among the eligible 346 patients equally divided into the two treatment groups, basiliximab reduced the proportion of patients who experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes by 28%: 61 (35.3%) basiliximab vs. 85 (49.1%) placebo (P=0.009). Graft losses occurred in 9 (5.2%) basiliximab-treated and 12 (6.9%) placebo-treated patients. Five (2.9%) deaths in the basiliximab group and seven (4.0%) in the placebo group occurred. Compared with placebo, a higher fraction of basiliximab patients produced urine in the operating room, and a significantly lower fraction had renal dysfunction in the first month (serum creatinine > or =5 mg(dl) and between 1 and 12 months (serum creatinine > or =3 mg/dl). During the first 12 months, 94 (54%) basiliximab-treated patients experienced serious adverse events, compared with 106 (61%) who received placebo.
                Prophylactic basiliximab therapy is well tolerated, has an adverse event profile comparable to placebo, and significantly reduces the number of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft patients within the first year after transplantation. nan Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimens posttransplantation have been claimed to conserve graft function in addition to reduce the risk factors for cardiovascular and malignant disease in renal transplant recipients.
                The primary aim of this prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study was to compare the effect of complete CNI-avoidance posttransplant (daclizumab + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: Dac-group, n=27) with the standard CNI-based immunosuppressive protocol at our transplant unit (cyclosporine A + mycophenolate mofetil + prednisolone: CsA-group, n=27) on renal function (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] determined as plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA) in a selected low immunogenic risk population (DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients).
                There were no significant difference in GFR at week 10 (P=0.61), but GFR was significantly (P=0.029) lower in the Dac-group (52+/-20 ml/min) at month 12 than in the CsA-group (69+/-29 ml/min). One-year patient and graft survival did not differ between the two groups. Overall acute rejection rate was 70.4% (19/27) in the Dac-group and 29.6% (8/27) in the CsA-group (P=0.006).
                The strategy to select DR-matched, PRA-negative de novo cadaveric transplant recipients for a CNI-avoidance protocol was not successful. The incidence of acute rejection was unacceptable high even though anti-CD25 antibody induction as well as initial higher mycophenolate mofetil doses (3 g/day) were applied, and renal function was significantly lower in the CNI-avoidance patients at 1 year. Other strategies need to be examined for avoidance of CNI's in the early posttransplant period. Immunosuppressive regimens based on low doses of cyclosporine A (CsA) or tacrolimus (TAC) may improve short-term outcome after kidney transplantation (KT), but the optimal immunosuppressive protocol is currently unknown.
                This study compared the 24-month efficacy and safety of two immunosuppressive regimens using reduced calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) exposure with standard dosage of CsA in 240 patients who were randomized into three groups: group A (n=80): Thymoglobulin, CsA (4 mg/kg twice daily) plus azathioprine (1.5 mg/kg once daily); group B (n=80): basiliximab, CsA (2 mg/kg/ twice daily) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 1 g twice daily); and group C (n=80): basiliximab, TAC (0.05 mg/kg/ twice daily) plus MMF (1 g twice daily). Steroid administration was identical for all groups.
                A significantly better creatinine clearance at 12 months, estimated by Cockcroft-Gault (57+/-12, 65.2+/-20, 73.5+/-27 ml/min, P=0.044), the Jelliffe-2 (51.5+/-16, 56+/-19, 59.4+/-19 ml/min/1.73 m2, P=0.041) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equations (53+/-17, 58.5+/-20, 61.6+/-22 ml/min/1.73 m2, P=0.035), was observed in group C compared with group A. No significant differences were observed between groups B and C. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was similar between groups (15%, 13.8%, and 16.3%). In addition, patient and graft survival at 24 months were not different between groups. Adverse effects were similar among groups, but cytomegalovirus infections was significantly higher in group A (41% vs. 20% vs. 25%; P=0.008).
                Immunosuppressive regimens with reduced CNI exposure provide similar preservation of renal function compared with standard dose of CsA after KT and do not lead to underimmunosuppression. nan New trends in immunosuppression in clinical transplantation include the use of antibody induction agents in protocols that emphasize reduction or avoidance of steroids and calcineurin inhibitors.
                In a randomized trial using three different antibody induction agents in 90 first renal transplant recipients from cadaver donors, group A received Thymoglobulin, group B received Alemtuzumab, and group C received Daclizumab. Maintenance immunosuppression included tacrolimus and mycophenolate in all three arms, and methylprednisolone in groups A and C only (standard clinical institutional practice). The targeted trough level of tacrolimus was between 8 and 10 ng/mL for groups A and C, respectively, with a targeted mycophenolate dose of 1 g twice daily. However, in group B, the target tacrolimus trough level was 4 to 7 ng/mL to reduce long-term nephrotoxicity, with 500 mg twice-daily doses of mycophenolate, without steroid maintenance.
                In this 15-month median postoperative interval report, there were no notable differences in demographics and patient and graft survivals. Acute rejection rates at 1 year were equivalent, that is, 5 of 30 in all three groups (16.6%). In group B, there was slightly lower renal function at 1 month, but no difference at 1 year. There was also significantly more leukopenia, but a greater percentage of T-regulatory cells and number of Fox-P3 mRNA copies by flow cytometry and semiquantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis, respectively, in group B.
                This preliminary analysis indicates that 80% of the patients in group B remained steroid-free 1 year postoperatively, with lower tacrolimus trough levels and no difference in other adverse events. nan Optimal immunosuppression is essential to maintain kidney allograft viability but minimizing toxicity is also fundamental.
                This article compares immunosuppressants, corticosteroids, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and basiliximab, which are used in the treatment regimens for renal transplantation. The analyses evaluated their effectiveness to prevent acute rejection episodes and to reduce the appearance of other complications, mainly infectious disease complications.
                Ninety-five patients were analysed during the first year after primary renal transplantation. These patients were included in a random way in 3 different groups according to the immunosuppressant drug therapy: Group I (35 patients) received corticosteroids + CsA; Group II (35 patients) received corticosteroids + CsA + Basiliximab; Group III (25 patients) received corticosteroids + Tacrolimus + Basiliximab.
                Among the 95 patients, 9 presented with an acute rejection episode in Group I. None in Group II, and one in group III. With reference to the infectious disease complications, the incidence of oral herpes was one case in Group I, 4 cases in Group II, and 2 cases in group III.
                Treatment with Basiliximab produced a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection cases and an increase in infectious disease complications, such as lip herpes. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to examine the effect of induction immunosuppression and low initial cyclosporine (CsA) on the onset of graft function and its long-term consequences.
                During 1999-2001, 155 patients were randomized to single 9 mg/kg dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG)-Fresenius (group A) or two 20-mg doses of basiliximab (group B) with reduced dose CsA or conventional CsA triple therapy without induction (group C).
                Delayed function (DGF) was lower in group A than in groups B or C (5.7% vs. 24.1% and 15.9%, P<0.025) and need of dialysis was less in groups A and B compared to C (10.3 and 10.4 vs. 20.0 days, P<0.05). Acute rejections occurred in 11.3%, 12.1% and 20.5%, and the mean (median) time to rejection was 16 (13), 97 (46) and 101 (35) days in groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.005). One-and 5-year graft survivals (GS) were 98.1% and 90.6% (group A), 96.6% and 96.6% (group B), and 93.2% and 84.1% (group C). Five-year GS was significantly better in group B than in group C (P<0.05). The death censored 5-year GS in groups A, B, and C were 94.3%, 96.6%, and 90.0% (P=NS). Single high-dose ATG induction was associated with hemodynamic and pulmonary disturbances without, however, serious or long-term consequences.
                ATG induction significantly reduced DGF. Both induction regimens together with low initial CsA led to significantly less posttransplant dialysis and excellent survival. The high dose ATG was associated with significant hemodynamic and pulmonary side effects during drug infusion. This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single dose of daclizumab versus no induction in kidney transplant recipients treated with a cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen seeking to observe the impact of a single-dose regimen for prevention of acute rejection among Chinese renal allograft recipients. A total of 118 renal transplant recipients were randomized into a daclizumab induction therapy group (daclizumab group, n = 58) and a no induction group (control group, n = 60). The daclizumab group received a single-dose (1 mg/kg of ideal body weight by intravenous infusion) 2 hours before the operation. There was no induction therapy in the control group. There was no significant difference in the baseline parameters at randomization between the two groups. The mean time to the first episode of acute rejection was 41.2 +/- 3.2 days for the daclizumab group versus 11.2 +/- 4.6 days for the control group. The number of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection episodes during the 6-months after transplantation was significantly different in the daclizumab (7,12.1%) versus the control group (14,23.3%; P < .001). At the end of 12 months, patient and graft survivals were 100% in the groups with or without daclizumab. We noted that the incidence of infection, including serious infection was similar, in the daclizumab group to that in the control group, 17.2% and 20.0%, respectively. This study showed that a single-dose of daclizumab effectively prevented acute rejection in Chinese renal allograft recipients. Sequential anti-thymocyte globulins (ATG)/cyclosporine immunosuppression has two main advantages: delayed introduction of the nephrotoxic drug cyclosporine and prevention of acute rejection. Basiliximab, a recently developed chimeric monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes the minor subpopulation of activated T lymphocytes, has been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection when used with cyclosporine introduced on day 1.
                This open, randomized, multicenter study was undertaken to compare the safety and efficacy of ATG versus basiliximab induction therapy (IT) with delayed introduction of cyclosporine for microemulsion (Neoral) in 105 low immunologic risk renal-transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids.
                One-year patient and graft survival rates were 98.1% and 94.2%, respectively, in the basiliximab group (n = 52), and 98.1% and 96.2% in the ATG group (n = 53). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was comparable (basiliximab 9.6%, ATG 9.4%), as were key parameters of renal function, notably serum creatinine levels, time-to-nadir serum creatinine, and the number of patients requiring posttransplantation dialysis (basiliximab 28.8%, ATG 30.2%). However, significantly fewer patients in the basiliximab group experienced cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia, and this without any significant difference in any other key safety parameters (including the incidences of serum sickness, fever, lymphoma, and infections in general).
                Both ATG and basiliximab, when used for IT in a sequential protocol, are equally effective in terms of graft and patient survival as well as at preventing acute rejection. However, basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of certain key adverse events, namely CMV infection, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia. Acute rejection remains a major problem in renal transplantation. Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) has achieved significant reductions in acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients receiving dual immunosuppression. This study explored the tolerability and cumulative benefit of combining basiliximab with triple-drug therapy-cyclosporine (USP Modified, Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.
                In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 123 kidney transplant recipients received either basiliximab at 20 mg before transplantation (day 0) and 20 mg on day 4 (n=59), or placebo (n=64). All received triple-drug immunosuppression and were followed for 6 months.
                Tolerability of basiliximab was equivalent to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events, infection, malignancy, or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. At 6 months, there were trends in favor of basiliximab over placebo in the incidences of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (15.3% vs. 26.6%, P=NS) and of acute rejection treated with antibody (5.1% vs. 15.6%, P=NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 4 weeks and 6 months were significantly in favor of basiliximab treatment for first acute rejection, biopsy-confirmed rejection, rejection episodes treated with antibody therapy, and treatment failure. Renal function improved more rapidly in the basiliximab group, with mean creatinine clearance at week 2 being 54.7 mL/min versus 43.2 mL/min for placebo (P=0.034). At 12 months, patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 94.9% with basiliximab and 92.2% with placebo.
                Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis is safe, well tolerated, and shows a trend toward reduction in number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. nan Acute rejection is still a major problem in renal transplantation and is one of the most important causes of chronic graft dysfunction and late graft loss. Selective immunosuppression with a humanized antibody against the alpha-chain of the interleukin (IL)-2 receptor (CD25) was evaluated to demonstrate the efficacy of this type of immunoprophylaxis in combination with dual immunosuppression.
                We studied the effect of daclizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the alpha-chain of the IL-2 receptor, in a randomized double-blind, prospective phase III clinical trial in 275 patients receiving a first cadaveric renal allograft. Among them 111 (83%) in the placebo arm and 116 (82%) in the daclizumab arm received the full regimen of five doses (1.0 mg/kg) every other week. Baseline immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and corticosteroids.
                At 6 months, 39 (28%) of the patients in the daclizumab group had biopsy-proven rejections, as compared with 63 (47%) in the placebo group (P=0.001). The need for additional antilymphocyte therapy, antithymocyte globulin, antilymphocyte globulin (ATG, ALG, OKT3) was also lower in the daclizumab group (8% vs. 16%, P=0.02), and they required significantly lower mean (+/- SD) cumulative doses of prednisone (3750+/-1981 mg vs. 4438+/-2667 mg in the placebo group, P=0.01). Graft function was significantly better (P=0.02) in the daclizumab group (graft function rate: 58 vs. 51 ml/min, mean) as was patient survival (P=0.01, 99% vs. 94%). No specific adverse events were observed in daclizumab-treated patients. Patients receiving daclizumab experienced fewer cytomegalovirus infections (18% vs. 25%), and none died from severe infectious complications, compared to four patients in the placebo arm. No patient in the daclizumab group had a lymphoproliferative disorder or any other form of immunosuppression-related tumor during the first year after transplant.
                Administration of daclizumab in addition to dual immunosuppression therapy significantly reduced biopsy-proven acute rejection after renal transplantation, improved patient survival, and did not add to the toxicity of the immunosuppressive regimen. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to assess whether immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) could reduce the incidence of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine (Neoral), steroids, and azathioprine.
                Three hundred forty patients received either placebo or basiliximab at a dose of 20 mg, given intravenously on days 0 and 4. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine. The primary endpoint was the incidence of acute rejection at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included the safety and tolerability of basiliximab and placebo, 1-year patient and graft survival, and significant medical events up to 12 months.
                During the first 6 months posttransplantation, acute rejection occurred in 20.8% of patients given basiliximab versus 34.9% of patients administered placebo (P=0.005). Similarly, there was a reduction in biopsy-proven acute rejection at 6 months in the patients receiving basiliximab (P=0.023). One-year patient survival was 97.6% with basiliximab and 97.1% with placebo, graft survival was 91.5% versus 88.4%, respectively (NS). The adverse-events profile of patients treated with basiliximab was indistinguishable from that of patients treated with placebo. The number of patients with infections was similar (65.5% for basiliximab vs. 65.7% for placebo), including cytomegalovirus infections (17.3% vs. 14.5%, P=0.245). Nine neoplasms (three in the basiliximab group, six in the placebo arm) were recorded up to 1 year from transplantation.
                Basiliximab in combination with cyclosporine, steroids, and azathioprine triple therapy was highly effective in reducing the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection without increasing the incidence of infections and other side effects. This study prospectively compared immunoprophylaxis with a single intraoperative dose (2 mg/kg) of monoclonal interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) antibody vs. noninduction in kidney transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus (FK 506), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and a prednisone-based immunosuppression regimen. One hundred recipients of first-kidney transplant were enrolled into the study to receive either anti-IL-2R monoclonal antibody, daclizumab (2 mg/kg intraoperatively, limited anti-IL-2R) or no induction (control). Each patient also received oral tacrolimus (dosed to target trough level 10-15 ng/mL), MMF (500 mg bid) and prednisone. The primary efficacy end-point was the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection during the first 6 months post-transplant. The patients were also followed for 12-month graft function, and graft and patient survival rates. Other than the donor's age being significantly lower in the control group, both groups were comparable with respect to age, weight, gender, race, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR mismatch, panel reactive antibody (%PRA), cold ischemic time, cytomegalovirus (CMV) status, causes of renal failure, and duration and modes of renal replacement therapy (RRT). During the first 6 months, episodes of first biopsy confirmed acute rejection was 3/50 (6%) in the limited anti-IL-2R group and 8/50 (16%) in the controls (p < 0.05). Twelve-month patient 100/98 (%) and graft survival 100/96 (%) were not statistically different. The group receiving limited anti-IL-2R did not have any adverse reactions. Our study demonstrates that a limited (single) 2 mg/kg immunoprophylaxis dose with monoclonal IL-2R antibody (daclizumab) when combined with tacrolimus/MMF/steroid allows significant reduction in early renal allograft rejection to the single digit level. The therapy with anti-IL-2R antibody is simple and is well tolerated. In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, BT563, a murine IgG1 anti-IL-2R antibody, was given as a rejection prophylaxis after kidney transplantation. Drug-related side effects were not observed. During the 10-day course of BT563, no rejections (0/27) were found, whereas a rejection episode occurred in 7 patients (7/29) (P = 0.01) during placebo treatment. Within the first 4 postoperative weeks, freedom from rejection in the BT563 group and in the placebo group was 96% vs. 76% (P = 0.05). Due to rejection in the placebo group, 2 grafts were lost. At 3 months, an overall rejection incidence in the BT563 and placebo group was found of 3/27 (11%) vs. 8/29 (28%) patients (P = 0.18). Infectious complications were distributed equally between the 2 groups. CMV disease, found in 3 placebo-treated patients, occurred after rejection treatment (2/3). Within the BT563 group, 1 patient lost his graft due to renal artery thrombosis, 2 grafts were lost as a result of technical failure, and 2 patients had a squamous cell carcinoma that could be treated curatively. We conclude that the use of the anti-IL-2R mAb BT563 effectively prevents rejection after kidney transplantation without increasing infectious complications. Monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor expressed on alloantigen-reactive T lymphocytes may cause selective immunosuppression. Daclizumab is a genetically engineered human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the alpha chain of the interleukin-2 receptor and may thus reduce the risk of rejection after renal transplantation.
                We administered daclizumab (1.0 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo intravenously before transplantation and once every other week afterward, for a total of five doses, to 260 patients receiving first cadaveric kidney grafts and immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone. The patients were followed at regular intervals for 12 months. The primary end point was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection within six months after transplantation.
                Of the 126 patients given daclizumab, 28 (22 percent) had biopsy-confirmed episodes of acute rejection, as compared with 47 of the 134 patients (35 percent) who received placebo (P=0.03). Graft survival at 12 months was 95 percent in the daclizumab-treated patients, as compared with 90 percent in the patients given placebo (P=0.08). The patients given daclizumab did not have any adverse reactions to the drug, and at six months, there were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to infectious complications or cancers. The serum half-life of daclizumab was 20 days, and its administration resulted in prolonged saturation of interleukin-2alpha receptors on circulating lymphocytes.
                Daclizumab reduces the frequency of acute rejection in kidney-transplant recipients. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) as immunosuppressive induction therapy for the prevention of acute allograft rejection among sensitized kidney recipients.
                Fifty-six adult recipients receiving cadaveric kidney transplant with panel reactive antibody class I ranging from 30% to 50% and or class II 30% to 80% were randomized at about a 2:1 ratio to the Simulect group (36 patients) or matching control group (20 patients). All patients received baseline triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Simulect was given in two doses of 20 mg each on day 0 (2 hours before operation) and day 4 after transplantation.
                There was no hyperacute rejection in either group and delayed graft function occurred in three control patients. The incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months was 11.1% in the Simulect group compared with 50% in the placebo group (77.8% reduction, P < .01). No apparent adverse and toxic events were recorded in the Simulect group. The mean daily dose of steroids was significantly higher in the control group 2 to 4 weeks posttransplantation. No clinically meaningful differences in the mean dose of cyclosporine were observed between the two groups; in addition, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of patient or graft survival.
                On the basis of appropriate selection of the donor and recipient, Simulect is effective and safety for the sensitized recipients as immunosuppressive induction therapy. Basiliximab (Simulect), a high-affinity chimeric, monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of human interleukin-2 receptor (CD25), reduces the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection when used in combination with cyclosporine (Neoral) and steroids. This study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of basiliximab to polyclonal anti-T-cell (ATGAM) therapy for the prevention of acute rejection in de novo renal transplant recipients.
                This 1-year, open-label, randomized trial was conducted in recipients of cadaveric or living-related donor renal transplants. All patients received cyclosporine (Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil (CellCept, MMF), and corticosteroids. Patients who were randomized to basiliximab therapy received a 20 mg i.v. bolus dose on days 0 and 4, and the majority of patients were initiated on cyclosporine within 48 hr of transplantation. Patients who were randomized to antithymocyte globulin therapy (ATGAM, ATG) received 15 mg/day i.v. within 48 hr of transplant and continued treatment for up to 14 days; ATG was stopped once therapeutic cyclosporine blood levels were achieved. The initiation of cyclosporine use was delayed in the ATG group until renal function was established (serum creatinine <3.0 mg/dl or 50% fall from baseline).
                Of the 138 randomized patients, 135 received at least 1 dose of study medication (70 patients, basiliximab; 65 patients, ATG). Demographic characteristics were similar between the basiliximab and ATG-treatment groups. At 12 months, the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 19% and 20%, respectively, in the basiliximab and ATG groups. Although the overall profile of adverse events was similar between basiliximab- and ATG-treated patients, adverse events considered by the investigators to be associated with the study drug occurred more often among patients receiving ATG (42% vs. 11% with basiliximab).
                Basiliximab combined with early initiation of cyclosporine therapy resulted in low acute rejection rates similar to those achieved with ATG combined with delayed cyclosporine. Basiliximab therapy showed an excellent safety profile, with no increases in malignancies, infections, or deaths. Based on its convenient two-dose, body-weight independent regimen and comparable effectiveness to ATG, basiliximab is an attractive choice for the prevention of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients. Immunosuppressive regimens with the fewest possible toxic effects are desirable for transplant recipients. This study evaluated the efficacy and relative toxic effects of four immunosuppressive regimens.
                We randomly assigned 1645 renal-transplant recipients to receive standard-dose cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids, or daclizumab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose cyclosporine, low-dose tacrolimus, or low-dose sirolimus. The primary end point was the estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end points included acute rejection and allograft survival.
                The mean calculated GFR was higher in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (65.4 ml per minute) than in the other three groups (range, 56.7 to 59.4 ml per minute). The rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection was lower in patients receiving low-dose tacrolimus (12.3%) than in those receiving standard-dose cyclosporine (25.8%), low-dose cyclosporine (24.0%), or low-dose sirolimus (37.2%). Allograft survival differed significantly among the four groups (P=0.02) and was highest in the low-dose tacrolimus group (94.2%), followed by the low-dose cyclosporine group (93.1%), the standard-dose cyclosporine group (89.3%), and the low-dose sirolimus group (89.3%). Serious adverse events were more common in the low-dose sirolimus group than in the other groups (53.2% vs. a range of 43.4 to 44.3%), although a similar proportion of patients in each group had at least one adverse event during treatment (86.3 to 90.5%).
                A regimen of daclizumab, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids in combination with low-dose tacrolimus may be advantageous for renal function, allograft survival, and acute rejection rates, as compared with regimens containing daclizumab induction plus either low-dose cyclosporine or low-dose sirolimus or with standard-dose cyclosporine without induction. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00231764 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
                Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society. The focus of progress in transplantation immunosuppression is to achieve more specific immunosuppression with monoclonal antibodies. We have already shown that the efficacy of 33B3.1, a rat monoclonal Ig2A directed against the human IL-2 receptor, was similar to that of rabbit antithymocyte globulin in the prevention of acute rejection in first kidney transplants. A similar comparative analysis has been made in 40-sec renal transplants. ATG (1 mg/kg/day) or 33B3.1 (10 mg/day) was administered during the first 10 days postgrafting in association with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Cyclosporine was introduced on day 9 and azathioprine/CsA constituted the patient's maintenance treatment after day 45. Rejection treatment consisted of equine antilymphocyte globulin in both cases and of steroid boluses when patients were under Cyclosporine. One patient in each group died. Graft survival was 90%, 85%, and 79% in the ATG group (n = 20) and 100%, 89%, and 89% in the 33B3.1 group (n = 20) at 3, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Of the ATG group patients, 45% and 40% in the 33B3.1 group had at least one rejection episode, half the episodes in the MoAb cohort occurring under 33B3.1, vs. none in the ATG group. Transplant function was similar in both groups. Viral infections appeared to be more frequent with ATG (60%) than with 33B3.1 (12%), with CMV accounting for half of these in the ATG group, and none in the MoAb group. Tolerance of both agents was good. Of the 33B3.1 recipients, 70% developed anti-33B3.1 antibodies. From these data, we conclude that this anti-IL-2 receptor MoAb seems less effective than rabbit ATG as induction treatment in second kidney transplant patients. We evaluated whether the regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) T-cells from patients on tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is affected by preceding steroid and anti-CD25 mAb induction therapy and whether this function is associated with rejection after kidney transplantation. Kidney recipients (N=15) were randomized to receive either anti-CD25 mAb induction (i.e., daclizumab) or steroids for 4 months. We analyzed the presence and suppressive activity of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) peripheral T-cells in samples obtained at pre and 4-6 months after transplantation. Anti-CD25 mAb therapy and treatment with steroids did not significantly affect protein expression of FoxP3. However, at the functional level, significant differences were found in the regulatory activities of CD4(+)CD25(high+) T-cells from the anti-CD25 group vs those from the steroid group. At 4-6 months after transplantation, the regulatory activities of CD4(+)CD25(high+) T-cells were comparable to those before anti-CD25 mAb therapy; 49+/-13% (mean+/-SEM) vs 40+/-14% at a 1:20 ratio (CD25(high+):CD25(-/dim)), respectively. In contrast, the regulatory capacities of CD(+)D25(bright+) T-cells from the steroid patient group became significantly impaired. The percentage inhibition of the anti-donor response decreased from 57+/-12% before transplantation to 12+/-7% after transplantation (p<0.01). Five out of 15 patients experienced a rejection episode. At 4-6 months after transplantation, the CD25(high+) cells from these rejectors (who all received daclizumab induction therapy) had clear regulatory function, while suppression by CD25(high+) cells from non-rejectors (N=10) was significantly lower. The percentage inhibition of the anti-donor response was 48+/-14% (mean+/-SEM) vs 10+/-7%, respectively, p=0.02. Anti-CD25 mAb induction therapy does not negatively influence the regulatory function of CD4(+)CD25(high+)FoxP3(+) T-cells from kidney transplant recipients on tacrolimus and MMF. The majority of these patients experienced an acute rejection episode, which suggests that immune activation is required for persistent immunoregulatory function. nan The aim of this work was to investigate the benefit of basiliximab induction therapy in living-related-donor kidney transplantation.
                One hundred adult recipients of a first kidney allograft were randomized into two treatment groups, one to receive basiliximab and the second as a control. All patients received maintenance triple immunosuppressive therapy (steroids, cyclosporine microemulsion and azathioprine). The patients were followed up for a minimum of three years. The end points for evaluation included the incidence of acute rejection episodes, severity of rejection, cumulative steroid dose, patients' and graft survival.
                Basiliximab significantly reduced the proportion of patients who experienced an acute rejection in the first year (18/50) compared to the control group (31/50). At three years there were 26 acute rejections in the basiliximab group and 36 in control group. The cumulative steroid dose at three and 12 months was significantly lower in the basiliximab group. The overall incidence of post-transplant complications was comparable in the two groups.
                Prophylactic basiliximab is well tolerated and significantly reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in living-related-donor kidney transplantation. This was a multi-center, open-label, randomized, dose-comparative study on 202 renal transplantation patients. We evaluated for the first time an alternative dosing regimen for basiliximab, consisting of a single 40-mg intravenous dose on day 1 post-transplantation plus triple therapy, in comparison with the conventional two-dose regimen (2 h before transplantation and on day 4) plus triple therapy. At 6 months, the incidence of acute rejection was low: 22.5% of patients in the basiliximab 2 x 20-mg group and 20.0% of patients in the basiliximab 1 x 40-mg group experienced an acute rejection episode ( P = 0.628) (biopsy-proven rejection: 19.6% and 17.0%, P = 0.585). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the secondary efficacy parameters. The incidence of graft loss by 12 months was 4.9% and 6.0% in the 2 x 20-mg and 1 x 40-mg group, respectively ( P = 0.73). No differences were observed between the dosage groups with regards to safety assessments (adverse events (AEs), infections, vital signs, laboratory safety evaluations, and physical examinations). The data reveal that basiliximab can be safely and effectively administered as a single 40-mg dose on day 1 after renal transplantation as a therapeutic option to the established 2 x 20-mg dosing regimen. This alternative dosing regimen may be of significant convenience under circumstances when a first dose of basiliximab was not given prior to transplantation. Both regimens can conveniently be used during the initial hospitalization of the patient. nan The side effects associated with corticosteroids have led to efforts to minimize their use in renal transplant patients. In this study we compared two corticosteroid-free tacrolimus-based regimens with a standard triple therapy.
                This was a 6-month, phase III, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. The total analysis set comprised 451 patients, randomized (1:1:1) to receive tacrolimus (Tac) monotherapy following basiliximab (Bas) administration (n=153), Tac/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (n=151), or, Tac/MMF/corticosteroids triple therapy as a control (n=147).
                The study was completed by 91.2% (triple therapy), 94.7% (Tac/MMF), and 82.4% (Bas/Tac) of patients. Patient baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. The incidences of biopsy-proven acute rejection were 8.2% (triple therapy), 30.5% (Tac/MMF), and 26.1% (Bas/Tac), p<0.001 (multiple test for comparison with triple therapy); Bas/Tac vs. Tac/MMF, p=ns. The incidences of corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection were 2.0%, 4.0%, and 5.2%, p=ns. Graft survival (95.9%, 96.7%, and 94.7%, p=ns) and patient survival (100%, 99.3%, and 99.3%, p=ns) were similar in all groups. Median serum creatinine at month 6 was 123.0 micromol/L (triple therapy), 134.7 micromol/L (Tac/MMF) and 135.8 micromol/L (Bas/Tac). The overall safety profiles were similar; differences (p<0.05) were reported for anaemia (24.5% vs. 12.6% vs. 14.5%), diarrhoea (12.9% vs. 17.9% vs. 5.9%), and leukopenia (7.5% vs. 18.5% vs. 5.9%) for the triple therapy, Tac/MMF, and Bas/Tac group, respectively. The incidences of new-onset diabetes mellitus were 4.6%, 7.1%, and 1.4%, respectively.
                Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression was feasible with the Bas/Tac and the Tac/MMF regimens. Both corticosteroid-free regimens were equally effective in preventing acute rejection, with the Bas/Tac therapy offering some safety benefits. Nondepleting anti-CD25 monoclonal antibodies (daclizumab) and depleting polyclonal antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) both prevent acute rejection, but these therapies have not been directly compared in a high-risk, HLA-sensitized renal transplant population. We randomly assigned 227 patients, who were about to receive a kidney graft from a deceased donor, to either Thymoglobulin or daclizumab if they met one of the following risk factors: current panel reactive antibodies (PRA) >30%; peak PRA >50%; loss of a first kidney graft from rejection within 2 yr of transplantation; or two or three previous grafts. Maintenance immunosuppression comprised tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. Compared with the daclizumab group, patients treated with Thymoglobulin had a lower incidence of both biopsy-proven acute rejection (15.0% versus 27.2%; P = 0.016) and steroid-resistant rejection (2.7% versus 14.9%; P = 0.002) at one year. One-year graft and patient survival rates were similar between the two groups. In a comparison of rejectors and nonrejectors, overall graft survival was significantly higher in the rejection-free group (87.2% versus 75.0%; P = 0.037). In conclusion, among high-immunological-risk renal transplant recipients, Thymoglobulin is superior to daclizumab for the prevention of biopsy-proven acute rejection, but there is no significant benefit to one-year graft or patient survival. Daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) decrease the incidence of acute allograft rejection. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed primarily to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in an immunosuppressive regimen incorporating daclizumab. At five centers, 75 renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive either daclizumab 1 mg/kg or placebo pre-transplantation and every other week, for a total of five doses. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and MMF. Levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA), its glucuronide metabolite, and daclizumab were measured after dosing on days 28 and 56. Safety parameters evaluated included: adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, infections, patient/graft survival, incidence of lymphoproliferative disorders, and incidence of acute rejection at 12 months. The concomitant administration of daclizumab and MMF had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of MPA: AUC(0-8) values (microg h/mL +/- SD) on day 28 were 30.1 +/- 13.3 for daclizumab-treat patients vs. 31.1 +/- 12.4 for placebo and on day 56, 37.7 +/- 18.2 for daclizumab-treated patients vs. 35.7 +/- 14.0 for placebo. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. Acute rejection at 12 months occurred in 14% of patients receiving daclizumab and 20% of patients receiving placebo. The coadministration of daclizumab did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction with MPA, the active metabolite of MMF. Despite all the advantages in the immunosuppressive therapy, kidney transplantation in immunologically high risk patients remains a challenge. Ideally, an induction therapy should provide maximal graft protection, while adverse events rate and costs remain as low as possible.
                Immunologically high risk kidney recipients with CDC-PRA ł 25% within the last 3 years, a positive B-cell CDC-crossmatch or graft loss due to rejection within 3 years following a prior transplantation, were randomized 1:1 to receive ATG-Fresenius (ATG-F) (9 mg/kg day 0; 3 mg/kg day 1-4) or Daclizumab therapy (1 mg/kg day 0, 14, 28, 42, 56) in a pilot study. Additional immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. 11 patients were included in each group.
                The patient (90% in ATG-F; 100% in Daclizumab) and graft survival (censored for death) (100% in ATG-F; 90% in Daclizumab) and the mean creatinine concentration at 24 months (139+/-68 mol/l in ATG-F; 176+/-103 mol/l in Daclizumab) were similar in both groups. More severe graft rejections (3 vascular rejections in Daclizumab) and adverse events (5.3/patient in ATG-F; 6.7/patient in Daclizumab) were observed in the Daclizumab group. The costs for hospitalization/ day within 24 months were lower in ATG-F (2.32+/-3.51 USD vs. 12.25+/-9.75 USD; p=0.02) resulting in an average cost-difference of more than 10'435 USD /patient.
                In this pilot trial, both treatments were comparably successful regarding graft and patient outcome. Corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression after organ transplantation eliminates the well-known corticosteroid-related side effects and may help to improve long-term outcome. We investigated whether a corticosteroid-free tacrolimus (Tac)/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen, in combination with daclizumab (Dac) induction therapy, provides adequate immunosuppression after renal transplantation.
                This 6-month, open-label, multicenter, parallel-group study involved 538 renal patients randomized (1:1) to a Dac/Tac/MMF regimen (n = 260) or a Tac/MMF/corticosteroids regimen (n = 278) as a control group.
                Of the patients who completed the study, 88.8% in the Dac/Tac/MMF group were free from corticosteroid therapy at month 6. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 16.5% in both treatment groups; the incidence of biopsy-proven corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection was 4.3% and 5.0% with Tac/MMF/corticosteroids and Dac/Tac/MMF, respectively (P = NS for both comparisons). Renal function was also similar in both groups: median serum creatinine at month 6 was 125.0 micromol/L (Tac/MMF/corticosteroids) and 131.0 microml/L (Dac/Tac/MMF), P = 0.277. The overall safety profile was similar with both regimens. However, compared with the Tac/MMF/steroid regimen, a significantly reduced incidence of new-onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (5.4% vs. 0.4%, P = 0.003) was found with steroid-free immunosuppression. Moreover, mean total cholesterol concentrations increased from baseline in the Tac/MMF/corticosteroids group by 0.19 mmol/L, whereas in the Dac/Tac/MMF group, levels decreased by 0.19 mmol/L, P = 0.005.
                Corticosteroid-free immunosuppression with a Dac/Tac/MMF regimen is as effective at preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation as a standard triple regimen of Tac/MMF/corticosteroids. Furthermore, the safety benefits reported with Dac/Tac/MMF treatment may help improve the long-term outcome for renal-transplant patients. Kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) have high rates of delayed graft function (DGF). Use of calcineurin inhibitors is associated with a reduction in renal blood flow, which may delay graft recovery from ischaemic acute tubular necrosis.
                To assess whether daclizumab (DZB) could safely replace tacrolimus in the immediate postoperative period, patients were randomized to receive DZB induction and daily mycophenolate mofetil with steroids (DZB group) or standard tacrolimus-based triple therapy (control group). Tacrolimus was given to patients in the DZB group when the serum creatinine level dropped below 350 micromol/l.
                Fifty-one patients were recruited at two centres over a 2-year interval between 2000 and 2003. The overall rate of immediate function was 28 per cent (13 of 46 grafts), with the highest rate in recipients of machine-perfused kidneys treated with DZB (eight of 15 patients).
                Induction with DZB and delayed introduction of tacrolimus reduced the incidence of DGF in recipients of machine-perfused NHBD kidneys.
                Copyright (c) 2005 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. In phase III trials daclizumab was used in a five-dose regimen of 1 mg/kg at 2-weekly intervals, resulting in saturation of IL-2Ralpha on circulating lymphocytes for up to 120 days after renal transplantation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate daclizumab blood concentrations and the saturation of the IL-2Ralpha on the circulating lymphocytes with a limited dosing regimen of daclizumab. Twelve patients undergoing primary cadaver or living donor transplantation were randomized to either receive one dose (2 mg/kg) or two doses (2nd dose, 1 mg/kg) of daclizumab in addition to maintenance immunosuppression therapy consisting of either tacrolimus or cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone. Patients were followed for 6 months after the transplantation. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed up to 20 weeks after the transplantation. In patients treated with a single dose of daclizumab, the blood concentrations of daclizumab declined to 1 micro g/mL at 43 +/- 7 days after the transplantation. In patients treated with two doses of daclizumab, the blood concentrations of daclizumab declined to 1 micro g/mL at 45 +/- 13 days after the second dose for a total of 59 +/- 13 days after the transplantation. Daclizumab levels of 1 micro g/mL or greater were associated with saturation of the IL-2Ralpha on the circulating lymphocytes. In the new era of effective maintenance immunosuppression, a limited dosing regimen of daclizumab may be desired, practical and economical. Patient entry is now complete in a prospective trial of anti-Tac, a murine IgG2a monoclonal antibody directed against the p55 chain of the human IL-2 receptor, for the prevention of renal allograft rejection. Recipients of primary cadaver allografts were randomized to receive either anti-Tac (20 mg q.d. x 10 days beginning POD 1) plus low-dose CsA (4 mg/kg/day), azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day), and prednisone (30 mg q.d.), or conventional triple therapy with CsA (8 mg/kg/day), azathioprine, and prednisone. Forty patients were entered in each group, with current followup from 6 to 26 months. The results show a significant reduction in early rejection episodes in the anti-Tac-treated patients. During the 10-day treatment, 5 of 40 anti-Tac patients had rejection episodes, compared with 21 of 40 control patients (P less than 0.001). Anti-Tac significantly delayed the time to the first rejection (12.5 +/- 6.3 vs. 7.6 +/- 6.7 days) (P less than 0.05). Despite these effects, there were no differences in either actual or actuarial graft or patient survival between the two groups. Pneumonia, primarily CMV, developed in 5 treated and 4 control patients. In patients with functioning grafts mean serum creatinine at 3 months was 1.8 +/- 0.7 in the anti-Tac group and 2.0 +/- 0.8 in the control group (P = NS); at 12 months the values were 2.3 +/- 1.5 and 1.8 +/- 0.5, respectively (P = NS). The peak expression of IL-2 receptors on circulating T-cells was significantly lower in anti-Tac patients (15.1 +/- 3.6%) than in controls (21.9 +/- 4.5%) (P less than 0.05). Seven of 10 patients tested to date developed antimouse immunoglobulin antibodies, with antiidiotype shown in 6. These antibodies do not preclude subsequent treatment with OKT3. Five patients in this and previous anti-Tac protocols have received OKT3 for acute rejection despite known pretreatment antimouse antibodies, with resolution of rejection in all cases. Basiliximab, a monoclonal CD25 antibody has proofed effective in reducing acute rejection episodes in adults in various immunosuppressive regimens. The effect of basiliximab in the pediatric population is controversial.
                In a 12-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, renal transplant patients aged 1 to 18 years were randomized to basiliximab or placebo with cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. The intent-to-treat population comprised 192 patients (100 basiliximab and 92 placebo).
                The primary efficacy endpoint, time to first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode, or treatment failure by month 6, occurred in 16.7% of basiliximab-treated patients and 21.7% of placebo-treated patients (Kaplan-Meier estimates; hazard ratio 0.72, two-sided 90% confidence interval 0.416-1.26, n.s.). The rate and severity of subclinical rejections in protocol biopsies performed at 6 months posttransplant was higher in the basiliximab group (25.0%) than in the placebo group (11.7%). Patient and death-censored graft survival at 12 months was 97% and 99%, respectively, in the basiliximab cohort, and 100% and 99% among placebo-treated patients (n.s.). Renal function was similar in both treatment groups, and there were no significant between-treatment differences in the incidence of adverse events or infections.
                Addition of basiliximab induction to a regimen of cyclosporine microemulsion, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids resulted in a numerically lower but not significant incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection versus placebo and excellent graft and patient survival at 1 year in pediatric renal transplant recipients. Whether this numerical difference is a true therapeutic benefit in view of the higher rate and severity of subclinical rejections in the basiliximab group in the protocol biopsy will be investigated in a long-term follow-up study. nan
Given a 38% risk of rejection, per 100 recipients compared with no treatment, nine recipients would need treatment with IL2Ra to prevent one recipient having rejection, 42 to prevent one graft loss, and 38 to prevent one having CMV disease over the first year post-transplantation. Compared with ATG treatment, ATG may prevent some experiencing acute rejection, but 16 recipients would need IL2Ra to prevent one having CMV, but 58 would need IL2Ra to prevent one having malignancy. There are no apparent differences between basiliximab and daclizumab. IL2Ra are as effective as other antibody therapies and with significantly fewer side effects.