Administration of combined diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine to infants and response to a booster dose of Hib conjugate vaccine. Comparison of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a combined diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B, inactivated polio (DTPa-HBV-IPV) vaccine, mixed with the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine and administered as a single injection, with the DTPa-IPV/Hib and hepatitis B vaccines administered in two simultaneous injections to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Immunogenicity and Reactogenicity following Primary Immunisation with a Combined DTaP-HBV Vaccine and a Haemophilus influenzae Type B Vaccine Administered by Separate or Mixed Injection. Evaluation of the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a DTPa-HBV-IPV Combination vaccine co-administered with a Hib conjugate vaccine either as a single injection of a hexavalent combination or as two separate injections at 3, 5 and 11 months of age. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of combined versus separately administered DTPw-HBV and Hib vaccines given to healthy infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster at 18 months. Reactogenicity of DTPa-HBV/Hib vaccine administered as a single injection vs DTPa-HBV and Hib vaccines administered simultaneously at separate sites, to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 combination vaccine: results from four phase III multicenter trials across three continents. Primary and booster immunization with a diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis, hepatitis B (DTPa-HBV) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine administered separately or together is safe and immunogenic. A new combined DTP-HBV-Hib vaccine--strategy for incorporation of Hib vaccination into childhood immunisation programmes. Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a novel hexavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine compared to separate concomitant injections of DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines, when administered according to a 3, 5 and 11 month vaccination schedule. A new DTPw-HB/Hib combination vaccine for primary and booster vaccination of infants in Latin America. Primary and booster vaccination with DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent vaccine in Costa Rican children who had received a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine. The new DTPw-HBV-Hib combination vaccine can be used at the who schedule with a monovalent dose of hepatitis B vaccine at birth. Primary vaccination of infants with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus- inactivated polio virus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines given as either separate or mixed injections. Immunogenicity of a Haemophilus influenzae type b-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine when mixed with a diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B combination vaccine. DTPw-HB and Hib primary and booster vaccination: combined versus separate administration to Latin American children. Immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent combined vaccine compared with separate administration of reference licensed vaccines in infants. A comparison of immunogenicity and safety of indigenously developed liquid (DTwPHB-Hib) pentavalent combination vaccine (Shan 5) with Easyfive (liq) and TritanrixHB + Hiberix (lyo) in Indian infants administered according to the EPI schedule. A combined liquid Hib (PRP-OMPC), hepatitis B, diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine: controlled studies of immunogenicity and reactogenicity.
We compared antibody levels following separate but simultaneous administration of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids with acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) containing pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin (PRN); hepatitis B vaccine; and Haemophilus influenzae type b polysaccharide (polyribosylribitol phosphate; PRP) vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T) with those following administration of a combination of a DTaP-hepatitis B vaccine-PRP-T to infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. The antibody response to a booster dose of PRP conjugate vaccine (CRM197-OS) in infants with low (< 1 microgram/mL) or undetectable (< 0.10 microgram/mL) postpriming levels of antibody to PRP was also studied. Antibody levels were quantitated before and after dose 3 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, or neutralization assay. Seroresponse rates were not different between the two vaccine groups except for rates of response to PRP. There was a trend that levels of antibody to all the antigens included in the combination vaccine were lower than those of antibody to antigens in separate vaccines; for levels of antibody to diphtheria toxoid (P = .001), PRN (P < .0001), and PRP (P < .0001), the differences were significant. Despite low or undetectable postpriming levels of antibody to PRP, high-titered (geometric mean concentration, 9.02 micrograms/mL; range, 1.0-81.5 micrograms/mL), immunoglobulin G-predominant antibody to PRP was produced following a booster dose of CRM197-OS, a finding consistent with a memory response. An open, randomised, multicentre trial was performed to compare the reactogenicity and safety profile of the administration of a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio (DTPa-HBV-IPV) vaccine administered in one injection mixed with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine (Group 1) with that of a pentavalent DTPa-IPV vaccine mixed with a Hib vaccine (DTPa-IPV/Hib), simultaneously administered with HBV (Group 2) in two injections in opposite thighs, as a primary vaccination course, to healthy infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. A total of 235 completed the study, 120 from Group 1 and 115 from Group 2. Blood samples (pre-vaccination and 1 month after the third dose) were obtained from a subset of infants (Group 1: 40; Group 2: 31) to assess the immune response to vaccination. Local and general solicited symptoms were recorded by parents on diary cards. Seven hundred and five diary cards (Group 1: 360; Group 2: 345) were collected. The clinically relevant and most commonly reported local reaction was pain (infant cried when the limb was moved) in 2.5% (Group 1) and 1.2% (Group 2) of diary cards. Fever was more frequently reported in Group 1 (21% of diary cards) than in Group 2 (12% of diary cards). However only 3 and 2% of doses in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, were responsible for a rectal temperature between 38.6 and 39.5 degrees C and only one case (Group 2) had > or =39.5 degrees C. Other clinically relevant general symptoms were rarely recorded: irritability (2-2.8%), loss of appetite (0.3-0.6%) and drowsiness (0.3-0.3%). All subjects included in the immunogenicity analysis had seroprotective titres to diphtheria, tetanus, polio virus types 1 and 3, Hib. Almost all subjects were seroprotected for anti-polio type 2 and hepatitis B (with the exception of 1 subject in Group 1 for each antigen). The vaccines response rates to pertussis antigens were over 97 and 90% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively. This study shows that, from a clinical perspective, the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine given in a single injection has a similar reactogenicity and safety profile to that of two licensed vaccines (DTPa-IPV/Hib, HBV) given in two simultaneous injections to infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. This is a valuable advantage, since in some countries, such as Spain and the UK, an additional injection (for the administration of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine) has been recently included in the infants' vaccination calendars. The aim of this open, randomised, multicentre trial was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the tetravalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B (DTaP-HBV) vaccine when given either as a mixed or as a separate concomitant injection with the Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine at 3, 5 and 11 months of age.
                Antibody against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (ELISA), hepatitis B (radioimmunoassay) and Hib polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) [radiolabeled antigen binding assay] was determined. Solicited local and systemic adverse events were evaluated on the day of each vaccination and for three subsequent days. Follow-up of unsolicited and serious adverse events was conducted for 30 days following each vaccination.
                A total of 360 subjects were enrolled in the study. After completion of the three-dose vaccination course, seroprotective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus and hepatitis B, together with a pertussis vaccine response, were seen in almost all subjects with immunogenicity results (n = 336). All subjects had post-vaccination Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations of at least 0.15 mug/mL, and 97.0% and 99.4%, respectively, of the subjects receiving a single or separate injections had Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations >/=1.0 mug/mL. Addition of the Hib vaccine to the tetravalent DTaP-HBV vaccine did not increase the incidence of local or systemic reactions.
                Combination of DTaP-HBV and Hib vaccines in a single injection is safe, immunogenic and well tolerated, and thus has the potential to simplify the childhood immunisation schedule in Italy. A combined DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine containing diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), acellular pertussis (Pa), hepatitis B (HBV) and types 1, 2 and 3 inactivated polioviruses (IPV) extemporaneously mixed with a conjugated Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine (Group 1) was compared to the DTPa-HBV-IPV and Hib vaccines (Group 2) administered separately at 3, 5 and 11 months of age (n = 440). A microneutralization assay was used to detect antibodies against the 3 polio virus types (cut-off 1:8 dil), RIA for anti-HBs antibodies (cut-off 10 mIU/ml) and ELISA for antibodies against all other vaccine antigens (cut-off: 0.1 IU/ml for anti-tetanus and anti-diphtheria antibodies; 5 El.U/ml for antibodies against each of the 3 acellular pertussis antigens and 0.15 microg/ml for anti-PRP antibodies). Similar immune responses were observed in both groups 1 month after dose 2 as well as after dose 3. Six months after dose 2 however, the proportion of subjects maintaining an anti-tetanus antibody concentration > or = 0.1 IU/ml was lower in Group 2 and a slight group difference in favour of Group 1 was also observed for anti-PRP, anti-diphtheria and anti-polio type 1 antibody persistence prior to the third dose. The overall incidence of local and general solicited symptoms was similar in both groups. One subject discontinued study vaccination following an SAE considered to be related to vaccination. The DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib combined vaccine is immunogenic and well tolerated when administered according to a 3, 5 and 11 month vaccination schedule and can therefore be considered as a feasible alternative to the separate administration of the pentavalent DTPa-HBV-IPV and the monovalent Hib vaccines. To determine the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a combined DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine, in comparison with DTPw-HBV and Hib vaccines given as separate concomitant injections.
                In an open, randomized study, healthy infants were injected with either DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine or separate DTPw-HBV and Hib vaccines at 2, 4 and 6 months of age, with a booster at 18 months.
                Both vaccination regimens were immunogenic, with seropositivity rates of 100% after the booster vaccination for all vaccine components. Even as early as 2 months after the second dose of the primary vaccination, most patients had seroprotective antibody titers, the proportion of seropositive subjects approaching 100% for tetanus, hepatitis B, and Hib. Post-primary and post-booster geometric mean titers (GMTs) were well above seroprotective thresholds for each vaccine antigen in both groups, with no clinically relevant differences in the groups. The separate and combined administrations showed comparable reactogenicity profiles, and neither showed a significant increase in reactogenicity with successive doses.
                The results of this study support the combination of Hib and DTPw-HBV vaccination in routine infant immunization at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with a booster at 18 months. Maximum benefit is obtained from compliance with the full course, but substantial benefit is likely to be achieved even in partially compliant patients, provided they receive at least two doses. Furthermore, these results demonstrate the tolerability of a fourth (booster) administration, where the addition of the Hib vaccine to DTPw-HBV did not lead to an increase in the overall reactogenicity. An open, randomised, multicentre trial was performed to assess the reactogenicity and safety profile of the administration of a candidate Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine with a quadrivalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B (DTPa-HBV) vaccine as a single injection (Group 1) versus the simultaneous administration of the latter vaccine (DTPa-HBV) and an available Hib conjugate vaccine (Group 2) in opposite thighs, as a primary vaccination course to healthy infants at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Eight hundred and eighty five infants (9.3+/-1.4 weeks old) were randomly allocated to Group 1 (n=665) and Group 2 (n=221). Oral polio vaccine was given concomitantly to all subjects. Blood samples (pre-vaccination and 1 month after the third dose) were obtained from a subset of infants (Group 1, 73; Group 2, 22) for serological determinations. Local and general symptoms were recorded by parents on diary cards. 2614 diary cards (Group 1, 1966; Group 2, 648) were collected. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of local and general symptoms between groups. Pain such that the infant cried when limb was moved was reported in 0.6 and 0.2% in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Redness and swelling (>20 mm in diameter) were recorded between 2.1 and 3% in both groups. Fussiness preventing normal activities was the most frequently reported general symptom in both groups (1.6 and 1.9% in groups 1 and 2, respectively). Fever (rectal temperature >39.5 degrees C) was reported in 0.4% (Group 1) and 0.3% (Group 2). All subjects included in the immunogenicity analysis had seroprotective or seropositive titres to the diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B and pertussis components of the vaccines. About 99 and 100% of infants had anti-PRP titres > or =0.15 mcg/ml in groups 1 and 2, respectively. This study indicates that DTPa-HBV vaccine given in a single injection with a candidate Hib conjugate vaccine has a similar reactogenicity profile to that of two commercially available vaccines (DTPa-HBV, Hib) given in two simultaneous injections to infants 2, 4 and 6 months of age. This paper presents the results of four separate phase III trials, which assessed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 in comparison with licensed Tritanrix-Hep B (GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals) and Hiberix (10 microg PRP), given as separate or mixed injections (3 trials) or with or without hepatitis B vaccine at birth (1 trial). The immunogenicity of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 was non-inferior to the reference vaccine regimen in terms of seropositivity rates. The overall reactogenicity profile of DTPw-HBV/Hib 2.5 was also similar to that of the reference vaccine regimen. These results confirm the previously established immunogenicity and safety of reduced dose PRP conjugated vaccine regimens. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of DTPa-HBV and Hib vaccines given mixed or separately to 360 healthy infants at 2, 4, and 6 months of age.
                Immune memory was assessed in lower responders (post-primary anti-PRP <0.545 microg/ml), through administration of plain polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP) at 12-15 months. All subjects received a DTPa-HBV/Hib booster at 18-19 months.
                One month after primary vaccination, 98% had seroprotective antibody levels against HBV and 94-97% against Hib (anti-PRP> or =0.15microg/ml). A statistically significant difference between groups was observed in the proportion of subjects who achieved anti-PRP antibodies > or =1.0microg/ml post-primary vaccination; 68.1% for DTPa-HBV/Hib and 84.5% for DTPa-HBV and Hib. PRP administered to lower responders produced a 7-fold increase in anti-PRP antibodies, indicative of immunological memory. After DTPa-HBV/Hib booster vaccination, 96-100% of subjects had seroprotective antibody concentrations against Hib, hepatitis B, tetanus, and diphtheria and high vaccine response rates against pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin.
                A robust and protective Hib response was demonstrated following plain PRP and/or a booster conjugate Hib vaccine in both lower and higher Hib responders.
                Copyright 2009 International Society for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. To evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a pentavalent vaccine prepared by extemporaneously mixing diphtheria-tetanus pertussis-hepatitis B vaccine (DTP-HBV) and lyophilised Haemophilus influenzae type B (Hib)-tetanus conjugate vaccines in the same syringe, compared with the same vaccines given as separate, concomitant administrations.
                Open, randomised comparative study.
                Durban, South Africa.
                A total of 120 healthy male and female infants were enrolled in the trial and randomised into two groups; group 1 received the combined administration (DTP-HBV-Hib), and group 2 received separate administrations of DTP-HBV and Hib vaccines. Vaccines were given as a three-dose primary vaccination course at 2, 4 and 6 months [corrected] of age.
                Antibody levels were measured using standard techniques and local and general solicited symptoms were recorded using diary cards.
                All subjects had seroprotective titres against diphtheria and tetanus; and antipolyribose-ribitol phosphate (PRP) titres > or = 0.15 microgram/ml 1 month after the final dose. A vaccine response (defined as post-vaccination titres > or = 15 ELISA (EL).U/ml in initially seronegative subjects; and as post-vaccination titres > or = pre-vaccination titres in initially seropositive subjects) against the pertussis component was seen in 83% and 85% of subjects in the groups receiving combined and separate administration. No differences were seen in any of the geometric mean titres (GMTs) between the two administrations either 2 months after the second dose or 1 month after the final dose. There was no observed increase in reactogenicity in the group receiving the mixed administration.
                The results demonstrate that combined DTP-HBV-Hib vaccine is well tolerated and immunogenic. In an open randomised trial, 312 eligible infants were enrolled to receive either a single injection of the hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio/ Haemophilus influenzae b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) vaccine, or concomitant injections of commercial DTPa-IPV/Hib and HBV vaccines (comparator). Vaccines were administered at 3, 5 and 11 months of age. The statistical approach for non-inferiority showed that the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib vaccine was at least as immunogenic as the comparator vaccines in terms of immunogenicity of all antigens 1 month after the 2nd dose. Non-inferiority criteria were also met immediately before and 1 month after the 3rd dose for all antigens except poliovirus type 3 prior to the 3rd dose. The majority of subjects were seroprotected against diphtheria, tetanus, polyribosyl-ribitol-phosphate, hepatitis B and poliovirus after the 2nd dose and maintained seroprotective antibody levels until the 3rd dose. A marked difference was observed in anti-HBs antibody geometric mean antibody concentrations (GMCs) at 1 month after the 2nd dose (higher GMCs in DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib group). Reactogenicity (incidence of solicited local and general symptoms) was similar between the two study groups and no vaccine-related serious adverse events occurred.
                the new diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio/ Haemophilus influenzae b vaccine administered at 3, 5 and 11 months of age was safe and at least as immunogenic as the comparator vaccines thus providing an effective and more comfortable option for this infant vaccination schedule. In 1998 the World Health Organization (WHO) recommended the inclusion of Haemophilus influenza type B (Hib) conjugate vaccines in infant immunization programs, whenever in accordance with national priorities. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals has developed a new pentavalent combined diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis-hepatitis B/Hib (DTPw-HB/Hib) vaccine containing 5 microg of polyribosylribitol phosphate (PRP), and we assessed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary and booster vaccination of healthy children with this new vaccine compared with a reference regimen consisting of the licensed DTPw-HB (Tritanrix) and Hib (Hiberix) vaccines given as simultaneous concomitant injections.
                We performed a randomized, double-blind study from September 1998 to August 1999 to establish the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of primary and booster vaccination of healthy children with the new pentavalent combined DTPw-HB/Hib vaccine given as a single injection, compared with the reference regimen.
                Both vaccination regimens elicited excellent immune responses, with all subjects in both groups achieving seroprotective anti-PRP antibody concentrations of > or = 0.15 microg/mL one month after primary vaccination. The combined DTPw-HB/Hib vaccine was non-inferior to the licensed vaccines in terms of seroprotection/seropositivity/vaccine response rates for all antigen components. Persistence of antibodies against all study vaccine antigens up to the time of booster vaccination was comparable between groups, and a marked increase of all antibody concentrations was observed after the booster dose. Both vaccine regimens were similar in terms of their overall reactogenicity profiles.
                Our results indicate that the new DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent combination vaccine provides an efficient and reliable way of implementing WHO recommendations for controlling hepatitis B and Hib infections on a worldwide basis. The DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent combination vaccine has been developed following recommendations of the World Health Organization for the introduction of hepatitis B (HB) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines into routine childhood vaccination programs. The objectives of this study were to: 1) analyze the immunogenicity and the reactogenicity of the DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent combination vaccine in comparison to separate injections of DTPw-HB and Hib vaccines as primary vaccination in a group of children who had received a dose of HB vaccine at birth and 2) in the second year of life to assess the antibody persistence as well as the response to a DTPw-HB/Hib or DTPw/Hib booster.
                In the first part of the study (primary-vaccination stage), conducted in 1998-1999, we analyzed the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of the DTPw-HB/Hib combination vaccine in comparison to separate injections of DTPw-HB and Hib vaccines as primary vaccination at 2, 4, and 6 months of age in 207 Costa Rican children who had received a dose of HB vaccine at birth. Later, in the booster-vaccination stage of the study, in 1999-2000, in a subset of the children (69 toddlers, now 15-18 months old), antibody persistence was measured, and response to a DTPw-HB/Hib or DTPw/Hib booster was also assessed.
                In both primary-vaccination groups, at least 97.5% of the infants reached protective levels of antibodies (seropositivity) against the antigens employed in the vaccines. The DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent combination vaccine did not result in more local reactions than did the DTPw-HB vaccine alone, and, in terms of general reactions, there was no clinically significant difference between the combination or separate injections, and with the pentavalent vaccine having the benefit of needing one less injection. Nine months after the third dose of the primary-vaccination course, antibody persistence was similar in both groups, with over 93% of children still having protective/seropositive titers for Hib, HB, and tetanus and about 50% for diphtheria and Bordetella pertussis. At 15 months of age, virtually all the toddlers responded with a strong boost response to all the vaccine antigens, whether they received the DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent vaccine or the DTPw/Hib vaccine as a booster. Both booster regimens were equally well tolerated, indicating that up to five doses of the HB vaccine can be given without impact on safety.
                Our study confirms that the DTPw-HB/Hib pentavalent vaccine is highly immunogenic as a primary vaccination in children who received an HB vaccine at birth, with the pentavalent combination inducing both persisting immunity and boostable memory. The pentavalent vaccine was safe both for primary and booster vaccinations. Thus, this study in Costa Rican infants supports the routine use of the pentavalent DTPw-HB/Hib vaccine as part of childhood vaccination programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. An open, randomized, clinical trial was conducted in order to assess the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of DTPw-HBV and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines when given either as a mixed administration or as separate concomitant injections using the WHO schedule at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age, following a dose of HBV at birth. There were no clinically relevant differences in the immune response to any component between the mixed and separate administrations. In fact the anti-tetanus GMTs were significantly higher (p=0.002) in mixed administration (3.9 IU/ml) compared with the separate administration (1.9 IU/ml). However although all subjects achieved anti-PRP titers > or = 0.15 microg/ml, higher anti-PRP GMTs were seen in the group receiving the separate administration. Importantly, the addition of Hib did not adversely alter the reactogenicity profile of DTPw-HBV. This report which demonstrates that this novel combination can be used in WHO recommended schedule. The aim of this open, multicenter, randomized trial was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a candidate combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio virus (DTaP-HBV-IPV) vaccine when given as either a mixed or as separate concomitant injections with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine.
                A total of 359 subjects were randomized to receive either DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (mixed administration - 180 subjects) or DTaP-HBV-IPV + Hib (separate administration in opposite limbs - 179 subjects) at 2, 3, and 4 months of age.
                After vaccination, seroprotective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, and polio viruses and a high (> or = 97%) pertussis vaccine response were seen in almost all study participants. All subjects except one in the mixed administration group had postvaccination Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations > or = 0.15 microg/mL. Of subjects in the mixed and separate group, 77.2% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 2. 62 microg/mL) and 88.6% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 4.45 microg/mL) had Hib anti-PRP concentrations > or = 1 microg/mL, respectively. The addition of the Hib component to the 5-component vaccine did not increase the incidence of local or general reactions.
                Both administrations of the candidate vaccine were found to be safe, immunogenic, and well tolerated. Although anti-PRP geometric mean antibody concentrations and the percent of subjects achieving the 1 microg/mL seroprotective level were lower after the mixed administration, they were in the range seen with monovalent Hib vaccines or with other DTaP-based/Hib combinations licensed in some European countries. Therefore both administrations have the potential to simplify childhood immunization. Combination vaccines are urgently needed to reduce the number of injections given to young children. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of a combination vaccine that contains diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis antigens (DTaP), recombinant hepatitis B surface antigen (HepB) and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus toxoid (PRP-T).
                Four hundred five infants were randomized equally to three groups and immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with: (1) DTaP/HepB vaccine used to reconstitute lyophilized PRP-T vaccine and administered as a single injection; (2) DTaP/HepB vaccine and PRP-T vaccine administered as two separate injections; or (3) DTaP, HepB and PRP-T vaccines administered as three separate injections. Safety was closely monitored, and blood specimens were obtained to assess antibody responses to each vaccine antigen.
                All study vaccines were well-tolerated, and the rates of systemic and injection site reactions were similar between groups. After the third dose the geometric mean antibody concentrations to Hib were significantly lower in subjects in Group 1 (1.63 microg/ml) compared with subjects in Groups 2 and 3 (6.26 and 6.15 microg/ml, respectively; P < 0.0001). Subjects with antibody concentrations <1.0 microg/ml after the third dose responded well to a booster dose of Hib conjugate vaccine given at 11 to 15 months of age (41 of 44 with anti-PRP > or = 1.0 microg/ml). Differences between groups for antibody responses to the other vaccine components were not clinically significant.
                Infants given a combined DTaP/ HepB/PRP-T vaccine experienced a significantly lower antibody response to the PRP-T component than infants given PRP-T vaccine as a separate injection. However, the immune response to a booster dose of Hib conjugate vaccine indicated the presence of immunologic memory. This multicentre study was designed to establish the reactogenicity and immunogenicity profiles of primary and booster vaccination with diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis whole-cell-hepatitis B/Haemophilus influenzae type-b (DTPw-HB/Hib) administered as either a syringe mix or as separate injections in 400 Latin American children. Both vaccine regimens were equally well tolerated and elicited post-primary excellent seropositivity rates at or close to 100% for all five component antigens. With regard to HB, 100% of subjects in the combined vaccination group, and 98.8% subjects in the separate injection vaccination group reached seroprotective antibody concentrations (>or=10 mIU/ml) 1 month after the primary vaccination course. Equally high anti-PRP antibody concentrations were reached 1 month after vaccination, with 100% of seroprotected subjects in the combined vaccination group (antibody concentrations >or=0.15 microg/ml), against 99.4% in the separate injection vaccination group. Seroprotective anti-HBs and anti-PRP antibody concentration levels persisted approximately 1 year after the primary vaccination course, just prior to booster vaccination. Finally, a significant increase of all antibody concentrations could be observed after the booster vaccination, since all but one subject in the separate injection vaccination group had protective levels of anti-HBs and anti-PRP antibodies 1 month after the booster dose. These results suggest that the combination of DTPw-HB and Hib vaccines provides an effective means for increasing vaccine coverage in childhood vaccination programmes. The immunogenicity and safety of a new liquid hexavalent vaccine (diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine-hepatitis B-polyribosyl ribitol phosphate conjugated to tetanus protein; Hexavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD, Lyon, France) are compared with those of reference vaccines [diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated polio vaccine reconstituting lyophilized purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide conjugated to tetanus protein vaccine (Pentavac; Aventis Pasteur MSD) and hepatitis B vaccine (H-B-Vax II; Aventis Pasteur MSD)] injected separately at the same visit in a prospective multicenter, comparative, open label trial.
                Infants were randomized to receive Hexavac (n = 423) or Pentavac and H-B-Vax II (n = 425) as a primary immunization series at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens at 1 month after the primary series were compared between the two vaccine groups with 95% confidence intervals (CI0.95) and were considered clinically equivalent (not inferior) when the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval on the difference (reference, hexavalent) was below predefined differences.
                Hexavac met and surpassed the pre-defined criteria for clinical equivalence to Pentavac and H-B-Vax II given concomitantly. It elicited similar seroprotection and seroconversion rates against all antigens. Seroprotection and seroconversion rates obtained 1 month after the third dose of Hexavac were >90% for all antigens. The postimmunization antibody geometric mean titers (GMT) for hepatitis B and purified Haemophilus influenzae polysaccharide were about 2-fold higher in infants who received the reference vaccines than in infants who had received Hexavac. GMTs for poliovirus antibodies tended to be enhanced in infants vaccinated with Hexavac. GMTs for all other antigens were very similar among both groups. Hexavac was generally well-tolerated. At least one local reaction was reported in 20.3% of Hexavac injections compared with 15.8% at the Pentavac injections site and 3.8% at the H-B-Vax II injections site. These reactions were generally mild and transient. At least one systemic adverse event was reported in 45.7% of Hexavac injections compared with 42.2% of Pentavac and H-B-Vax II injections (mild fever, irritability and drowsiness were most frequently reported). The frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between groups. No vaccine-related serious adverse event occurred during the study.
                This liquid hexavalent vaccine was generally well-tolerated and provided immune responses adequate to be protective against six infectious diseases with a single injection, given at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. The study was planned to assess and compare the immune response and safety of an indigenous DTPwHB-Hib pentavalent liquid combination vaccine (Shan 5) with Easyfive and TritanrixHB+ Hiberix, the two available pentavalent combination vaccines. Four hundred infants were randomized to receive three doses of either Shan 5 or one of the two comparators. Antibody analysis was performed prior to and four to six weeks post third vaccine dose. Solicited local and systemic events upto three days and unsolicited adverse events in the 30 days follow up period after each dose were recorded. A total of 365 subjects completed the study. Four to six weeks after third dose, 98.32% of the subjects in Shan 5 group had seroprotective Anti PRP-T IgG antibody concentrations (> or =0.15 microg/mL) as compared to 100% and 98.94% subjects in TritanrixHB + Hiberix and Easyfive groups respectively. Seroprotective levels for Anti-HBs (> or =10 mIU/mL) were observed in 97.77%, 97.83% and 98.94% subjects in Shan 5, TritanrixHB + Hiberix and Easyfive groups respectively. Comparable immune responses were observed for the three other components (D, T and P) in all the groups. Four Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) were reported (three with Shan 5 and one with Easyfive), all unrelated to the respective vaccines. Most commonly reported adverse events in all the groups were pain at injection site, mild fever (<103 degrees F) and minor swelling at injection site. The study proved that Shan 5 was safe and immunogenic compared to the two other licensed vaccines. We evaluated the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a new liquid pentavalent combination vaccine, which incorporates a diphtheria, tetanus and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTP) with Hib (PRP-OMPC) and hepatitis B vaccine (HB), in a series of three studies involving 2156 infants. The vaccination schedule was 2, 4, 6 and 18 months for all studies. In addition, subjects in the third study also received a dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine at birth. The principal study was a randomised double blind trial of two separate, but concurrently administered vaccines in each of three groups: pentavalent vaccine [DTP-Hib-HB] plus placebo (Group A, n=619); quadrivalent vaccine [DTP-HB] plus Hib vaccine (Group B, n=620); and bivalent vaccine [Hib-HB] plus DTP (Group C, n=226). The second study (Group D, n=231) was an open trial of three separate, but concurrently administered licensed control vaccines (DTP, Hib and HB). The third study (Group E, n=460) administered a dose of monovalent hepatitis B vaccine at birth followed by pentavalent vaccine as for Group A. Subjects were bled prior to the 2- and 18-month vaccinations, and a month after the 6- and 18-month vaccinations. A diary card was used to record subject temperatures and other systemic and local clinical signs for 7 days after each vaccination. The pentavalent vaccine, whether or not preceded by a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine, was generally well tolerated at all administration times, and had a reactogenicity profile similar to that observed for licensed vaccine controls. Diphtheria and tetanus antibody levels were substantially above protective levels in all study groups. The anti-HBs responses (% > or = 10 mIU/ml) following the 6-month dose of vaccines were, respectively, for Groups A-E: 83.2, 91.7, 96.5, 98.8 and 93.9%, and following the 18-month doses: 87.9, 97.5, 98.8, 98.8 and 92.8%. Anti-PRP responses (% > or = 1.0 microg/ml) following the 6-month dose for Groups A-D were 86.0, 90.5, 91.2, and 74.4%, and after the 18-month dose for Groups A-E were 97.3, 98.3, 98.1, 97.0, and 99.5%. Consistently higher geometric mean titres (GMTs) for pertussis antibodies to agglutinogens (Agg2, Agg3) and pertactin were recorded for the pentavalent vaccine compared to the licensed control vaccine, though they were somewhat lower for pertussigen (PT). Except for the hepatitis B response, antibody responses induced by the pentavalent vaccine to all antigens with a schedule commencing at 2 months of age and completed at 18 months were equivalent to responses to the same antigens induced by the separate, but concurrently administered licensed control vaccines. A regimen of a birth dose of hepatitis B vaccine followed by pentavalent vaccine at 2, 4, 6 and 18 months was not countered by any clinically significant decrease in seroresponses.
We could not conclude that the immune responses elicited by the combined vaccine were different from or equivalent to the separate vaccines. There was significantly less immunological response for HIB and tetanus and more local reactions in the combined injections. However, these differences rely mostly on one study each. Studies did not use an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis and we were uncertain about the risk of bias in many of the studies. These results are therefore inconclusive. Studies addressing clinical end points whenever possible, using correct methodology and a large enough sample size should be conducted.