Efficacy of inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for treatment of mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department: a randomized clinical trial. High-dose inhaled fluticasone does not replace oral prednisolone in children with mild to moderate acute asthma. A comparison of inhaled fluticasone and oral prednisone for children with severe acute asthma. Efficacy of nebulized budesonide compared to oral prednisolone in acute bronchial asthma. Efficacy of nebulized fluticasone propionate in adult patients admitted to the emergency department due to bronchial asthma attack. Acute resistant asthma caused by excessive beta-2-adrenoceptor agonist inhalation and reversed by inhalation of beclomethasone. Co-administration of salbutamol and fluticasone for emergency treatment of children with moderate acute asthma. Salbutamol and/or beclomethasone diproprionate in asthma. [Nebulized budesonide to treat acute asthma in children]. The effect of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma. Randomized, controlled trial of inhaled budesonide as an adjunct to oral prednisone in acute asthma. Inhaled flunisolide for acute severe asthma. Triple inhaled drug protocol for the treatment of acute severe asthma. Comparison of inhaled fluticasone with intravenous hydrocortisone in the treatment of adult acute asthma. The effects of combined intravenous and inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for the emergency treatment of acute asthma. The Asthma ED Study Group. Nebulized budesonide added to standard pediatric emergency department treatment of acute asthma: a randomized, double-blind trial. Effectiveness and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling acute asthma attacks in children who were treated in the emergency department: a controlled comparative study with oral prednisolone. Acute effect of nebulized budesonide in asthmatic children. Anti-inflammatory effects of high-dose inhaled fluticasone versus oral prednisone in asthma exacerbations. Nebulized dexamethasone versus oral prednisone in the emergency treatment of asthmatic children. A single dose of nebulized budesonide decreases exhaled nitric oxide in children with acute asthma.
To examine the efficacy of an inhaled steroid, when added to a standard regimen of beta-agonist therapy, in the treatment of patients with mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department.
                A convenience sample of adult patients with asthma (FEV1 % predicted 40% to 69%) presenting to the ED was randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion into 2 treatment groups. The first group received 2.5 mg nebulized salbutamol plus 1 mg (4 puffs) of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) at baseline, 30 minutes, and at 1, 2, and 4 hours, delivered by a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) attached to a spacer device (Vent-AH-aler, Glaxo). The second group was given the same salbutamol regimen plus MDI placebo through the Vent-AH-aler. The primary endpoint was improvement in FEV1 %predicted at 6 hours.
                Of 54 patients enrolled, 28 were assigned to the BDP group and 26 to the placebo group. Spirometry improved significantly in both groups over the 6 hours compared with baseline (ANOVA, P <.001). At 6 hours, the mean absolute improvement in FEV1 % predicted for BDP was 18% versus 17% for placebo (95% confidence interval for the absolute difference of 1% [-8% to 10%]). The proportion of patients in the BDP group who were hospitalized was 7% compared with 19% for patients in the placebo group (95% confidence interval for the difference of 12% [-6%, 30%]).
                In this group of patients with mild to moderately severe asthma, 5 mg BDP delivered by MDI during the initial 4 hours of an emergency visit was of no added benefit over standard therapy, as measured by improvement in FEV1 % predicted at 6 hours. However, a trend toward a difference in admission favoring BDP was observed. [Afilalo M, Guttman A, Colacone A, Dankoff J, Tselios C, Stern E, Wolkove N, Kreisman H: Efficacy of inhaled steroids (beclomethasone dipropionate) for treatment of mild to moderately severe asthma in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial. Inhaled corticosteroids are not as effective as oral corticosteroids in school-aged children with severe acute asthma. It is uncertain how inhaled corticosteroids compare with oral corticosteroids in mild to moderate exacerbations.
                The purpose of this work was to determine whether there is a significant difference in the percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children with mild to moderate acute asthma treated with either inhaled fluticasone or oral prednisolone.
                This was a randomized, double-blind controlled trial conducted between 2001 and 2004 in a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. We studied a convenience sample of 69 previously healthy children 5 to 17 years of age with acute asthma and forced expiratory volume in 1 second at 50% to 79% predicted value; 41 families refused participation. Albuterol was given in the emergency department and salmeterol was given after discharge to all patients, as well as either 2 mg of fluticasone via metered dose inhaler and valved holding chamber in the emergency department plus 500 microg twice daily via Diskus for 10 doses after discharge (fluticasone group, N = 35) or 2 mg/kg of oral prednisolone in the emergency department plus 5 daily doses of 1 mg/kg of prednisolone after discharge (prednisolone group, N = 34). We measured a priori defined absolute change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline to 4 and 48 hours in the 2 groups. RESULTS. At 240 minutes, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased by 19.1% +/- 12.7% in the fluticasone group and 29.8% +/- 15.5% in the prednisolone group. At 48 hours, this difference was no longer significant (estimated difference: 4.0 +/- 3.4; P = .14). The relapse rates by 48 hours were 12.5% and 0% in the fluticasone group and prednisolone group, respectively.
                Airway obstruction in children with mild to moderate acute asthma in the emergency department improves faster on oral than inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of children with asthma. It is uncertain how inhaled corticosteroids compare with oral corticosteroids in the management of severe acute disease.
                We performed a double-blind, randomized trial involving 100 children five years of age or older who had severe acute asthma (indicated by a forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1] that was less than 60 percent of the predicted value) and in whom the results could be evaluated. All were treated with an aggressive bronchodilator regimen and received one dose of either 2 mg of inhaled fluticasone through a metered-dose inhaler with a spacer or 2 mg of oral prednisone per kilogram of body weight. They were assessed hourly for up to four hours.
                The mean (+/-SD) base-line FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value was 46.3+/-12.5 in the fluticasone group (51 subjects) and 43.9+/-9.9 in the prednisone group (49 subjects). The FEV1 increased by a mean of 9.4+/-12.5 percentage points in the fluticasone group and by 18.9+/-9.8 percentage points in the prednisone group four hours after therapy (P< 0.001). None of the children in the prednisone group had a reduction in FEV1 as a percentage of the predicted value from base line to four hours, as compared with 25 percent of those in the fluticasone group (P<0.001). Sixteen (31 percent) of the children treated with fluticasone were hospitalized, as compared with five (10 percent) of those treated with prednisone (P=0.01).
                Children with severe acute asthma should be treated with oral prednisone and not with inhaled fluticasone or a similar inhaled corticosteroid. To evaluate the efficacy of nebulized budesonide compared to oral prednisolone early in the emergency room management of acute asthma, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Eighty children, 2 years to 12 years of age, with acute moderate attacks of asthma, were randomized into two groups. One group received nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) and placebo at half-hourly intervals for three doses, and a single dose of oral prednisolone (2 mg/kg) (prednisolone group) and other group received three doses of nebulized salbutamol and budesonide (800 microg) at half-hourly intervals and a single dose of placebo tablets (budesonide group). The baseline characteristics of the two groups were similar, but after three doses of nebulization oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, pulmonary index and respiratory distress score were significantly improved in the budesonide group compared to prednisolone group (p < 0.01). The proportion of patients who were fit for discharge at the end of 2 h after the third dose of nebulization was significantly higher in the budesonide group than in the prednisolone group (22/ 41, 54% vs 7/39, 18%, p < 0.001). The data suggest that a combination of nebulized salbutamol and budesonide should be preferred in the emergency room management of children with acute moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma and who are not on prior oral or inhaled steroid therapy. Locally delivered steroids by inhalers or nebulizers have been shown in small trials to be effective in acute asthma attack, but evidence-based data are insufficient to establish their place as routine management of adult asthma attacks.
                To determine the efficacy of nebulized compared to systemic steroids in adult asthmatics admitted to the emergency department following an acute attack.
                Adult asthmatics admitted to the ED were assigned in random consecutive case fashion to one of three protocol groups: group 1--nebulized steroid fluticasone (Flixotide Nebules), group 2--intravenous methylprednisolone, group 3--combined treatment by both routes. Objective and subjective parameters, such as peak expiratory flow, oxygen saturation, heart rate and dyspnea score, were registered before and 2 hours after ED treatment was initiated. Steroids were continued for 1 week following the ED visit according to the protocol arm. Data on hospital admission/discharge rate, ED readmissions in the week after enrollment and other major events related to asthma were registered.
                Altogether, 73 adult asthmatics were assigned to receive treatment: 24 patients in group 1, 23 in group 2 and 26 in group 3. Mean age was 44.4 +/- 16.8 years (range 17-75 years). Peak expiratory flow and dyspnea score significantly improved in group 1 patients compared with patients in the other groups after 2 hours of ED treatment (P = 0.021 and 0.009, respectively). The discharge rate after ED treatment was significantly higher in groups 1 and 3 than in group 2 (P = 0.05). All 73 patients were alive a week after enrollment. Five patients (20.8%) in the Flixotide treatment arm were hospitalized and required additional systemic steroids. Multivariate analysis of factors affecting hospitalization rate demonstrated that severity of asthma (odds ratio 8.11) and group 2 (OD 4.17) had a negative effect, whereas adherence to chronic anti-asthma therapy (OD 0.49) reduced the hospitalization rate.
                Our study cohort showed the advantage of nebulized steroid fluticasone versus systemic corticosteroids in adult asthmatics managed in the ED following an acute attack. Both these and previous results suggest that nebulized steroids should be used, either alone or in combination with systemic steroids, to treat adults suffering acute asthma attack. With the aim of devising an improved beta 2-agonist treatment regimen for patients presenting with acute severe resistant asthma, a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study of the effect of fenoterol and beclomethasone inhalations was done in 40 patients. Fenoterol inhalations had minimal effect in acute resistant asthma, but significant improvement was obtained when beclomethasone inhalations were given before fenoterol inhalations. Sequential beclomethasone and fenoterol inhalations can therefore be used as a preliminary emergency treatment for these patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nebulized therapy with salbutamol alone or in combination with fluticasone. In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 150 children with moderate acute asthma were randomly assigned to receive by nebulizations either (i) three doses of salbutamol 30 microl/kg per dose, each dose administered every 15 min, (ii) three doses of salbutamol plus two doses of fluticasone 500 microg/dose at 15 and 30 min after first dose of salbutamol, or (iii) three doses of salbutamol/fluticasone 500 microg/dose, each combined dose administered every 15 min. Pulse oxymetry (SaO2), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and Wood et al. (Am J Dis Child, 123, 1972, 123) clinical scale were evaluated at baseline, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min after the first nebulization. Patients in the three groups significantly improved since 15 min after the first nebulization. We did not observe differences in the recovery of SaO2 and PEF among the three groups of treatment (p > 0.10). In group 3, children showed better clinical response at 120 min than the other two groups (p < 0.05). No significant adverse effects were observed with any treatment. To summarize, in children with acute moderate asthma, nebulized salbutamol at an accumulated dose of 90 mul/kg plus fluticasone at an accumulated dose of 1500 microg produced better clinical relief after 2 h. However, similar PEF and SaO2 responses were observed with salbutamol alone or in combination with different doses of fluticasone. Acute severe exacerbation of asthma is potentially life threatening and requires critical assessment and appropriate therapy. Now a days, steroids are often combined with bronchodilators for the treatment of bronchial asthma. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to compare effectiveness of beclomethasone diproprionate-salbutamol combination versus salbutamol alone by MDI (with or without spacer) in acute asthma.
                A total of 57 paediatric patients (5-12 years) with acute attack of bronchial asthma attending emergency department of Indira Gandhi Medical College and Hospital was randomised to receive salbutamol (100 microg/puff) alone or with BDP (50 microg/puff) by metered dose inhaler with or without spacer. All baseline investigations were repeated one hour after the therapy.
                Clinical parameters indicative of severity of asthma improved statistically in all treatment groups. The increase in PEFR was better with MDI-S+B with spacer as compared to other groups, though it failed to reach statistical significance. The fall in serum potassium level is significantly more with MDI-S+B group when spacer was not used. No serious adverse effects were observed in any of the treatment groups.
                Metered dose inhalation of BDP-salbutamol combination with spacer provides better recovery whereas fall in serum potassium with MDI-S+B suggests use of spacer and monitoring of serum potassium during treatment. To investigate the efficacy of a single dose of inhaled budesonide as compared to oral prednisone in patients with acute asthma.
                Randomized double-blind, double-dummy and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Forty-nine children aged 2 to 7 years with acute asthma were randomized in three groups after receiving nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg). Group I received placebo both as tablets and nebulization, group II was treated with a single dose of oral prednisone (1 mg/kg) and inhaled placebo, and group III received a single dose of placebo tablet and nebulized budesonide (2 mg). Patients were evaluated in terms of symptom score and transcutaneous hemoglobin saturation. Nebulized salbutamol was repeated in case of increasing symptom score or lower saturation.
                Progressive clinical improvement was observed in all three groups. However, a significant increase in hemoglobin saturation was observed after 2 hours with prednisone, 4 hours with budesonide, and 24 hours with placebo.
                A combination of single-dose nebulized budesonide and salbutamol may be as effective as oral prednisone to improve symptom severity, but the latter increases hemoglobin saturation in exacerbation of asthma. The role of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of acute asthma remains a controversial subject.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group clinical trial on the effect of a 5-d course of nebulized budesonide treatment in children with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma was performed. The need for systemic corticosteroid intervention was evaluated as the primary outcome measure.
                Sixty-seven children aged 6 to 15 y were enrolled. During the emergency department phase, they received three nebulizations of either budesonide(1 mg/dose) or placebo, and then in the home phase of the study, they continued their study medications twice a day for another 4 d. Though the level of improvement in the emergency department phase was similar between the groups given either budesonide or placebo treatments (6.8 +/-1.9% vs 4.0+/-1.5%, p = 0.30, respectively), nebulized budesonide caused a trend towards a benefit in terms of the need for systemic corticosteroid intervention (2/33 vs 7/34, p = 0.07), but not in secondary outcome measures.
                Though we show a tendency towards a benefit with nebulized budesonide in children with mild to moderate exacerbations in terms of prevention of progression of the illness, the documented benefit is small and includes, at least, consideration for clinical significance, cost-effectiveness, impracticality and safety. To compare the clinical effect of nebulized budesonide with placebo in acute pediatric asthma.
                A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial with parallel design was used in the ED of a tertiary care children's hospital. Children aged 6 months to 18 years with a moderate to severe exacerbation of asthma [Pulmonary Index Score (PIS) > or = 5 or < or = 11 after a salbutamol nebulization of 0.15 mg/kg] were eligible. All patients received prednisone 1 mg/kg orally and nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg) every 30 minutes for 3 doses and then every hour for 4 hours. The intervention was 2 mg (4 mL) of nebulized budesonide or 4 mL of nebulized normal saline.
                Baseline characteristics were comparable in the budesonide group (n = 24) and in the placebo group (n = 20). There were no significant differences in the primary outcome measure (PIS) between the 2 groups. However, the PIS at 1 hour had a tendency to be lower in the budesonide group (median = 5) as compared with the placebo group (median = 6; p = 0.07). Survival analysis of release/discharge from the ED/hospital showed a more rapid rate in the budesonide group as compared with the placebo group (p = 0.02). No adverse effects were seen.
                Although these preliminary results suggest that nebulized budesonide may be an effective adjunct to oral prednisone in the management of moderate to severe asthma exacerbations, a larger trial will be required before the widespread use of inhaled budesonide in acute asthma can be advocated. This randomized, double-blind trial was designed to determine the benefit of high and cumulative doses of flunisolide added to salbutamol in patients with acute asthma in the emergency room (ER). Ninety-four patients who presented to an ER for treatment of an acute exacerbation of asthma were assigned in a randomized, double-blind fashion to receive salbutamol and placebo (n = 47) or salbutamol combined with flunisolide (n = 47). Both drugs were administered successively through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h (400 microg of salbutamol and 1 mg of flunisolide every 10 min). In both groups, FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) improved significantly over baseline values (p < 0.01). Results in the flunisolide group were significantly different from those in the placebo group at 90, 120, 150, and 180 min. Data analyzed separately in accord with the duration of the attack before presenting at the ER (< 24 or > or = 24 h) showed that the placebo > or = 24 h group produced a significantly lower FEV1 at 120, 150, and 180 min (p = 0.041) than did the remaining groups. Our data support the theory that high and cumulative doses of inhaled flunisolide administered by metered-dose inhaler with spacer and added to salbutamol are an effective therapy for patients with acute asthma and a prolonged duration of symptoms before ER presentation. This study tests the hypothesis that the administration of multiple doses of inhaled albuterol (A), ipratropium bromide (IB), and flunisolide (F) provides an additional benefit to adults with acute severe asthma compared with the administration of A plus IB (A/IB) or A plus F (A/F).
                Randomized, double-blind, prospective trial. Patients and interventions: One hundred seventy-two patients who presented to an emergency department were assigned to receive A, IB, and F (ie, triple drug treatment [TDG]; 56 patients), A/IB (60 patients), or A/F (56 patients). All drugs were administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-min intervals for 3 h.
                Patients who received TDG had an overall 64% greater improvement (95% confidence interval [CI], 24 to 103%; p = 0.002) in FEV(1) (mean [+/- SD], 2.1 +/- 0.6 L) than those who received A/F (mean, 1.7 +/- 0.6 L), and a 41% greater improvement (95% CI, 1 to 80%; p = 0.04) than those who received A/IB (mean, 1.8 +/- 0.6 L). Differences between groups increased with time (p = 0.001). At 3 h, there was a trend toward a reduction in hospital admission rates (A/IB group, 25%; A/F group, 20%; and TDG group, 11%). The patients who were the most likely to benefit (ie, those with a greater improvement in pulmonary function and a significant reduction in the hospitalization rate) from TDG were those with more severe obstruction (ie, FEV(1), < 30% of predicted). The benefit of TDG was equally evident independent of the patient's previous use of corticosteroids.
                The data suggest that there was a therapeutic benefit from the addition of IB and F to A administered in high doses, particularly in those patients in whom the FEV(1) was < 30% of the predicted value. Several studies published in the second half of the 1990s have shown a therapeutic early effect of inhaled corticosteroids in acute asthma. However, systemic corticosteroids are considered the standard of care.
                To compare the effect of repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone with the standard treatment of systemic corticosteroids in adult patients with severe acute asthma.
                One hundred six patients (mean age, 33.5 +/- 8.8 years) were randomly assigned to receive fluticasone (3,000 microg/hour) administered through a metered-dose inhaler and spacer at 10-minute intervals for 3 hours, or 500 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone. In addition, all patients received inhaled albuterol and ipratropium bromide.
                Subjects treated with fluticasone showed 30.5 and 46.4% greater improvements in PEF and FEV1, respectively, compared with the hydrocortisone group. The fluticasone group had better PEF and FEV1 at 120, 150, and 180 minutes (p < 0.05). Also, the fluticasone group showed higher rates of patients who obtained the discharge threshold at 90, 120, and 150 minutes. This therapeutic benefit was particularly evident in those patients with the most severe obstruction. Subjects with a baseline FEV1 of less than 1 L treated with fluticasone showed a significant increase in pulmonary function (p = 0.001) and a significant decrease in hospitalization rate (p = 0.05).
                The use of repeated doses of inhaled fluticasone was more effective than intravenous hydrocortisone and was associated with an early improvement. This therapeutic benefit was particularly evident in those patients with the most severe obstruction. To compare the efficacy of high-dose inhaled steroids in conjunction with IV steroids with that of IV steroids alone in the emergency treatment for acute asthma.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial was conducted on 60 ED patients presenting with acute asthma. All patients received nebulized salbutamol, and IV methylprednisolone, 80 mg at baseline and 40 mg at 6 hours. In addition to the above therapy, the experimental group received beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 7 mg over 8 hours via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) attached to a holding chamber, while the control group received a placebo administered in the same fashion. Patients were treated on the protocol for 12 hours with the primary outcome measure being the change in % predicted FEV1.
                Of 60 patients, 30 were randomized to BDP (age: 42 +/- 16 years; FEV1: 0.97 +/- 0.42 L) and 30 were randomized to placebo (age: 37 +/- 18 years; FEV1: 0.98 +/- 0.35 L). Spirometry and dyspnea measured by the Borg Scale improved significantly in both groups compared with baseline (p < 0.001). Changes in spirometry measures, dyspnea, and vital signs did not differ between treatment groups over the 12 hours of study (p > 0.05).
                Inhaled BDP added to the standard regimen of IV methylprednisolone, and beta-agonist did not further improve flow rates or dyspnea scores measured for up to 12 hours after presentation to the ED. The goal was to determine if adding inhaled budesonide to standard asthma therapy improves outcomes of pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute asthma.
                The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a tertiary care, urban pediatric ED. Patients 2 to 18 years of age with moderate to severe acute asthma were randomized to receive either a single 2-mg dose of budesonide inhalation suspension (BUD) or normal sterile saline (NSS) placebo, added to albuterol, ipratropium bromide (IB), and systemic corticosteroids (SCS). The primary outcome was the difference in median asthma scores between treatment groups at 2 hours. Secondary outcomes included differences in vital signs and hospitalization rates.
                A total of 180 patients were enrolled. Treatment groups had similar baseline demographics, asthma scores, and vital signs. A total of 169 patients (88 BUD, 81 NSS) were assessed for the primary outcome. No significant difference was found between groups in the change in median asthma score at 2 hours (BUD -3, NSS -3, p = 0.64). Vital signs at 2 hours were also similar between groups. Fifty-six children (62%) were admitted to the hospital in the BUD group and 55 (62%) in the NSS group (difference 0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -14% to 14%). Neither multivariate adjustment nor planned subgroup analysis by inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) use prior to the ED significantly altered the results.
                For children 2 to 18 years of age treated in the ED for acute asthma, a single 2-mg dose of budesonide added to standard therapy did not improve asthma severity scores or other short-term ED-based outcomes.
                © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Inhaled corticosteroids have a greater antiinflammatory potency and fewer systemic effects than intravenous, intramuscular, or oral corticosteroids. However, their role in acute asthma has not been established. We prospectively investigated the efficacy and safety of inhaled corticosteroids in controlling moderately severe acute asthma attacks in children who were treated in the emergency department.
                Children who were treated in the emergency department with moderately severe asthma attacks after receiving treatment with inhaled terbutaline were allocated by double-blind design to receive 1 dose of either 1600 micro(g) budesonide turbohaler or 2 mg/kg prednisolone. The pulmonary index score and peak expiratory flow rate were measured hourly for the first 4 hours. After discharge the children were treated with the same initial doses given 4 times daily, followed by a 25% reduction in dose every second day for 1 week. Parents recorded asthma symptoms and use of beta-2 agonists on a daily diary card. Serum cortisol concentration was measured at the end of weeks 1 and 3.
                Twenty-two children (11 in each group) with similar baseline parameters completed the study. There was a similar improvement in pulmonary index score and peak expiratory flow rate in the 2 groups. Children treated with budesonide showed an earlier clinical response than those given prednisolone, who also showed a decrease in serum cortisol concentration.
                In children with moderately severe asthma attacks who were treated in the emergency department, a short-term dose schedule of inhaled budesonide turbohaler, starting with a high dose and followed by a decrease over 1 week, is at least as effective as oral prednisolone, without suppressing serum cortisol concentration. The acute anti-inflammatory effects of inhaled steroids at high doses and their use at home and as emergency treatment of acute asthma attacks in children have been evaluated in many clinical studies. However very little is known about their additional bronchodilator response to systemic steroids plus nebulized salbutamol in the early management in children. Asthmatic patients aged between 5-15 years were investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. Both the study group (Group I) and the control group (Group II) received three consecutive doses of nebulized salbutamol (0.15 mg/kg/dose) and one dose of parenteral methylprednisolone (1 mg/kg/dose, intramuscularly). After this treatment, nebulized budesonide (1 mg/dose) was administered to patients in the study group and placebo (nebulized saline) was administered to patients in the control group. Pulmonary index scoring and peak flow meter was performed to both groups before and after the treatment. There were twelve patients in Group I (mean age: 7.90 +/- 2.34 years) and fourteen patients in Group II (mean age: 9.36 +/- 2.55 years). There was no difference between the two groups with respect to age (p = 0.1421), gender (p = 1.000) and inhaled steroid prophylaxis rate (p = 0.2177). No statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups with respect to the pulmonary index score (p = 0.3528). Yet, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups with respect to the increase in PEFR (p = 0.0155). The positive acute effect of nebulized budesonide in addition to systemic steroids and nebulized salbutamol in improving the spirometric indices in asthmatic children is an encouraging finding for further investigations of its routine use in the pediatric emergency department. The objective of the present study was to investigate the kinetics of high doses of inhaled steroid fluticasone in comparison with oral steroid prednisone on plasma protein leakage and bronchial eosinophilia in adults with moderate asthma exacerbations. The study design was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective trial. In total, 45 patients treated at the emergency department for moderate asthma exacerbations were recruited and 39 were assigned to receive fluticasone and placebo of prednisone (19 patients), or prednisone and placebo of fluticasone (20 patients). Medication was administered to all patients via a metered-dose inhaler and spacer (16 puffs; 4,000 microg.day(-1) or placebo) plus one pill (prednisone 30 mg.day(-1) or placebo). Spirometry and induced sputum for differential cell counts, albumin and alpha(2)-macroglobulin levels and blood eosinophils, interleukin-5 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor levels were obtained before treatment and at 2, 6 and 24 h after treatment. Symptoms clearly improved after 24 h in both groups. No differences were seen between groups in peak expiratory flow or forced expiratory flow in one second, which improved progressively but then decayed slightly after 24 h. Eosinophil counts in sputum also improved over time in both groups. The effect was faster with fluticasone than with prednisone, but was partially lost at 24 h. However, plasma proteins in sputum and eosinophil count in blood both decreased until 24 h, with no significant differences between groups. There was no correlation between eosinophil counts and plasmatic protein levels. In conclusion, both treatments improved symptoms, airway obstruction and inflammation, and plasma protein leakage at 24 h. Prednisone reduced blood eosinophil counts, while fluticasone reduced airway eosinophil counts, suggesting that the anti-inflammatory performance of fluticasone is exerted locally. To compare nebulized dexamethasone with oral prednisone in the treatment of children with asthma.
                A randomized, double-blind, double-placebo study.
                An urban pediatric emergency department.
                Patients aged 1 to 17 years with acute asthma.
                Patients with moderate asthma exacerbation received frequent aerosolized albuterol and either 1.5 mg/kg of nebulized dexamethasone or 2 mg/kg of oral prednisone.
                A total of 111 children was evaluated; 21% of those treated with dexamethasone required hospitalization, compared with 31% of those treated with prednisone (P = .26). A significantly greater proportion of dexamethasone-treated children were discharged home within 2 hours (23% versus 7%, P = .02). In the dexamethasone group, 8% who received the drug by mouthpiece were hospitalized compared with 33% who received it by face mask (P = .06). Fewer children treated with dexamethasone vomited (0% versus 15%, P = .001) and fewer relapsed within 48 hours of ED discharge (0% versus 16%, P = .008).
                Nebulized dexamethasone was as effective as oral prednisone in the ED treatment of moderately ill children with acute asthma and was associated with more rapid clinical improvement, more reliable drug delivery, and fewer relapses. This study was conducted to investigate whether a single dose of nebulized budesonide effectively decreased airway inflammation as demonstrated by exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels. A single dose of nebulized budesonide, but not nebulized terbutaline, rapidly decreased eNO levels in 6 hours. The decrease in eNO levels induced by nebulized budesonide was correlated to an increase in peak expiratory flow rate.
ICS therapy reduces hospital admissions in patients with acute asthma who are not treated with oral or intravenous corticosteroids. They may also reduce admissions when they are used in addition to systemic corticosteroids; however, the most recent evidence is conflicting. There is insufficient evidence that ICS therapy results in clinically important changes in pulmonary function or clinical scores when used in acute asthma in addition to systemic corticosteroids. Also, there is insufficient evidence that ICS therapy can be used in place of systemic corticosteroid therapy when treating acute asthma. Further research is needed to clarify the most appropriate drug dosage and delivery device, and to define which patients are most likely to benefit from ICS therapy. Use of similar measures and reporting methods of lung function, and a common, validated, clinical score would be helpful in future versions of this meta-analysis.