Limitations of theophylline in the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Caffeine citrate for the treatment of apnea of prematurity: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare theophylline and doxapram for the treatment of apnea of prematurity. Theophylline in treatment of apnoea of prematurity. The efficacy of caffeine in the treatment of recurrent idiopathic apnea in premature infants. Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity trial: benefits may vary in subgroups.
Theophylline is commonly used to treat apnea of prematurity. To determine the effectiveness of theophylline with respect to gestational and postnatal age, we conducted a controlled study in 43 premature infants with idiopathic apnea. Three of the 21 treated and eight of the 22 control infants developed respiratory failure. Eight of the 11 infants with respiratory failure had gestational ages of less than 31 weeks and had more than four apneic episodes during the first day of life. In the treated infants without respiratory failure, the number of apneic episodes by 24-hour intervals declined six days earlier than in the control infants. Apnea disappeared, however, at a similar time in both groups. Three treated infants and three control infants had apneic episodes persisting beyond the neonatal period. Patients treated with theophylline did not develop respiratory failure as often as control infants did. However, despite a reduction of apneic episodes, theophylline did not shorten the course of apnea of prematurity. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of caffeine citrate for treatment of apnea of prematurity.
                Multicenter, parallel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with open-label rescue.
                Nine neonatal intensive care units.
                Eighty-five infants, 28-32 weeks postconception and 24 hours or more after birth who had six or more apnea episodes within 24 hours.
                Caffeine citrate 10 mg/kg (as caffeine base) administered intravenously, followed by 2.5 mg/kg/day orally or intravenously, or placebo, for up to 10 days. Infants failing double-blind therapy could receive open-label rescue.
                Success was defined as 50% or greater reduction in apnea episodes and elimination of apnea. Caffeine citrate was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing apnea episodes by at least 50% in 6 days (p<0.05), and approached statistical significance (p<0.10) in 3 days. It was significantly better than placebo in eliminating apnea in 5 days (p<0.05), and approached significance (p<0.10) in 2 days. The number of infants with an aggregate of 7-10 days of at least a 50% reduction in apnea events or elimination of apnea was significantly higher in the caffeine citrate than in the placebo group. Adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. No correlations were found between success and mean daily plasma concentrations or baseline characteristics. Volume of distribution and clearance increased with weight, supporting weight-adjusted dosing of caffeine citrate.
                Caffeine citrate 10 mg/kg caffeine base (equivalent to 20 mg/kg caffeine citrate) intravenously followed by 2.5 mg/kg/day caffeine base (equivalent to 5 mg/kg/day caffeine citrate) either intravenously or orally for 10 days is safe and effective for treating apnea of prematurity in infants 28-32 weeks postconception. A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of theophylline and doxapram therapy in 31 infants with significant apnea of prematurity. Of 10 infants, two had a short-term response to placebo, 8 of 10 infants to theophylline, and 7 of 11 infants to doxapram (placebo vs treatment with theophylline or doxapram: p = 0.01). The two infants who initially responded to placebo remained responsive for the duration of the study. Of the eight infants in whom treatment with placebo failed, five were randomly assigned to receive theophylline, for a total of 15 infants treated with theophylline, and two of the eight were randomly assigned to receive doxapram, for a total of 13 infants treated with doxapram; the remaining infant required tracheal intubation. Of the 15 infants randomly assigned to receive theophylline, seven responded for the duration of the study; of the eight infants who did not respond to treatment with theophylline, five responded to doxapram, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and two remained resistant to treatment. Of the 13 infants randomly assigned to receive doxapram four responded for the duration of the study; of the nine who did not respond to doxapram, seven responded to theophylline, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and one remained resistant to treatment. This study demonstrates that although therapy with theophylline or doxapram is associated with a significant short-term reduction in the incidence of apnea compared with that in placebo-treated infants, the long-term response to treatment is frequently incomplete and is not sustained more than 1 week. nan This prospective controlled study was aimed at evaluating the efficacy of caffeine in treating recurrent idiopathic apnea in the premature infant. Eighteen preterm infants (29 to 35 weeks' gestation) were studied. Recordings during the first 24 hours and on the fifth day of caffeine treatment showed a significant decrease of severe apnea (P less than 0.01) and of mild apnea (P less than 0.001) in the treated group (group 1) as compared with the control group (group II). No treatment of apnea other than caffeine was required in group I, whereas six neonates in group II had such severe and frequent apneic episodes for more than 48 hours that withholding additional treatment was believed to be unethical. No undesirable side effects of caffeine treatment were observed. To determine whether the benefits of caffeine vary in three subgroups of 2006 participants in the Caffeine for Apnea of Prematurity (CAP) trial.
                Post-hoc subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of: (1) indication for commencement of study drug: treat apnea, prevent apnea, or facilitate extubation; (2) positive pressure ventilation (PPV) at randomization: endotracheal tube (ETT), noninvasive ventilation, or none; and (3) timing of commencement of study drug: early or late (< or =3 versus >3 days). Outcomes assessed were those showing treatment effects in the original analyses. We investigated the consistency of caffeine effects by using regression models that incorporated treatment/subgroup factor interactions.
                There was little evidence of a differential treatment effect of caffeine in subgroups defined by the clinical indication for starting study drug. The size and direction of the caffeine effect on death or disability differed depending on PPV at randomization (P = .03). Odds ratios (95% CI) were: no support, 1.32 (0.81-2.14); noninvasive support, 0.73 (0.52-1.03); and ETT, 0.73 (0.57-0.94). Adjustment for baseline factors strengthened this effect (P = .02). Starting caffeine early resulted in larger reductions in days of respiratory support. Postmenstrual age at time of discontinuing PPV was shorter with earlier treatment (P = .01). Mean differences (95% CI) were: early, 1.35 weeks (0.90-1.81); and late 0.55 weeks (-0.11-0.99). Adjustment for baseline factors weakened this effect (P = .03).
                There is evidence of variable beneficial effects of caffeine. Infants receiving respiratory support appeared to derive more neurodevelopmental benefits from caffeine than infants not receiving support. Earlier initiation of caffeine may be associated with a greater reduction in time on ventilation.
                Copyright 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Methylxanthine is effective in reducing the number of apnoeic attacks and the use of mechanical ventilation in the two to seven days after starting treatment. Caffeine is also associated with better longer term outcomes. In view of its lower toxicity, caffeine would be the preferred drug for the treatment of apnoea.