Dietary sodium restriction impairs insulin sensitivity in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Glomerular charge and size selectivity assessed by changes in salt intake in type 2 diabetic patients. Effect of sodium intake on blood pressure and albuminuria in Type 2 diabetic patients: the role of insulin resistance. Autonomy of the renin system in type II diabetes mellitus: dietary sodium and renal hemodynamic responses to ACE inhibition. Sodium restriction and blood pressure in hypertensive type II diabetics: randomised blind controlled and crossover studies of moderate sodium restriction and sodium supplementation. Renal functional response to protein loading in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients on normal or high salt intake. Renal responses to sodium restriction in patients with early diabetes mellitus. Enhanced responsiveness of blood pressure to sodium intake and to angiotensin II is associated with insulin resistance in IDDM patients with microalbuminuria. Sodium sensitivity related to albuminuria appearing before hypertension in type 2 diabetic patients. Sympathetic vasoconstrictive responses to high- and low-sodium diets in diabetic and normal subjects. Effects of dietary sodium on blood pressure in IDDM patients with nephropathy. Short-term moderate sodium restriction induces relative hyperfiltration in normotensive normoalbuminuric Type I diabetes mellitus.
Dietary sodium restriction has a variety of effects on metabolism, including activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Angiotensin II has complex metabolic and cardiovascular effects, and these may be relevant to the effects of both nonpharmacological and pharmacological interventions in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). We have assessed the effect of dietary sodium restriction on insulin sensitivity and endogenous glucose production in eight normotensive patients with diet-controlled NIDDM who underwent hyperinsulinemic clamp studies in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over protocol after two 4-day periods on sodium replete (160 mmol/day) and sodium deplete (40 mmol/day) diets. Mean +/- SD 24-h urinary sodium was 197 +/- 76.0 mmol (replete) and 67 +/- 19.5 mmol (deplete), P = 0.03. Insulin sensitivity was 42.0 +/- 11.3 mumol/kg.min (replete) and 37.0 +/- 11.6 mumol/kg.min (deplete), P = 0.04 (a reduction of 12%). Blood pressure was 130 +/- 21/78 +/- 11 mmHg (replete) and 128 +/- 12/73 +/- 10 mmHg (deplete). Dietary sodium restriction may result in a decrease in peripheral insulin sensitivity in normotensive patients with NIDDM, possibly via an elevation in prevailing angiotensin II concentrations. To evaluate glomerular charge selectivity in patients with type 2 diabetes, we studied changes in fractional clearance of proteins with different sizes and charges when patients were placed on two diets with different salt contents.
                Nineteen patients with type 2 diabetes and normoalbuminuria (< 20 micrograms/min, n = 8), microalbuminuria (20-100 micrograms/min, n = 7), or advanced albuminuria (> 100 micrograms/min, n = 4) were placed on a low-salt diet (85 mEq of sodium daily) or a high-salt diet (255 mEq of sodium daily) for 1 week, and then on the other diet, in random order. Fractional clearances of albumin and immunoglobulin G (IgG) were calculated on the last 3 days of each diet.
                In patients with normoalbuminuria, the high-salt diet increased the fractional clearance of IgG, which is electrically neutral, but the fractional clearance of albumin, which is anionic, was unaltered, suggesting that the pore charge of the glomerular barrier was unaffected. However, in patients with microalbuminuria, the high-salt diet increased the fractional clearances of IgG and albumin equally, indicating some neutralization of the pore charge. Fractional clearance of IgG in these first two groups was similar when salt intake was low, so pore size was the same in these groups. In patients with advanced albuminuria, fractional clearance of IgG was higher than in the other groups, indicating that size selectivity had worsened.
                In type 2 diabetic patients, charge selectivity is lost before size selectivity as diabetic nephropathy progresses. This study was done to measure the effect of Na+ intake on blood pressure and albuminuria, in relation with insulin sensitivity and kidney haemodynamics, in Type 2 diabetic patients with and without microalbuminuria.
                Type 2 diabetic patients, 20 with microalbuminuria, 21 without, spent two consecutive 7-day periods, one on a high (250 mmol), the other on a low-Na+ (20 mmol) diet. Body weight, 24-h blood pressure and albuminuria were measured at the end of each period. At the end of high-Na+ diet insulin sensitivity (euglycaemic insulin clamp; 2 mU.kg(-1).min(-1)) and kidney haemodynamics were measured in nine patients from each group.
                Switching from low to high-Na+ diet resulted in an increase in blood pressure (7.4+/-4.7 mmHg; p<0.001), body weight (1.9+/-0.4 kg; p<0.05) and albuminuria [from 80 (31-183) microg/min to 101 (27-965) microg/min; p<0.01) in patients with microalbuminuria. No changes occurred in patients without microalbuminuria. Patients with microalbuminuria also had greater intraglomerular pressure (44+/-1 mmHg vs 36+/-1; p<0.001), calculated from glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, plasma protein concentration and the relationship between pressure and natriuresis. In these patients insulin sensitivity was lower (5.16+/-49 vs 7.36+/-0.63 mg.kg(-1).min(-1); p=0.007). Urinary albumin excretion (r=0.40; p=0.009) and insulin sensitivity (r=-0.59; p=0.01) were correlated with intraglomerular pressure.
                High salt intake increases blood pressure and albuminuria in Type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. These responses are associated with insulin resistance and increased glomerular pressure. Insulin resistance could contribute to greater salt sensitivity, increased glomerular pressure and albuminuria. Recognition that non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is a leading cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and a focus of recent therapeutic and genetic studies on the renin system have rekindled interest in mechanisms by which angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors influence the diabetic kidney. We evaluated the renal hemodynamic status of 19 hypertensive patients with NIDDM under controlled sodium balance, low (10 mmol/day for 5 to 7 days) or high (200 mmol/day for 5 to 7 days). The renal plasma flow (RPF) response to ACE inhibition and to angiotensin II (Ang II) infusion was measured as para-aminohippurate (PAH) clearance before and during enalapril administration (10 mg b.i.d. for 3 days). Our premise was that if renal vasodilation induced by ACEI involves kinins, prostaglandins, and/or nitric oxide, vasoconstrictor responses to Ang II would be blunted. Conversely, if the dominant ACE inhibitor action were a reduction in Ang II formation, the consequence would be up-regulation and an enhanced vasoconstrictor response to exogenous Ang II. RPF in NIDDM on a high-salt diet was lower than in age-matched controls (477 +/- 25 vs. 551 +/- 25 ml/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.02). Enalapril increased RPF in NIDDM to 511 +/- 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P < 0.05) and enhanced renal vasoconstrictor responses to Ang II infusion, from -68 +/- 9 to -106 +/- 18 ml/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.03). Baseline plasma renin activity (PRA) and plasma aldosterone significantly exceeded matched normotensive controls (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.1 ng AI/ml/hr and 10 +/- 0.9 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.5 ng/dl, P < 0.01, respectively). Conversely all measures in studies on a low-salt diet were normal. Our findings indicate that: (1) NIDDM with hypertension is associated with reduced RPF when dietary salt intake is high, (2) reduced Ang II formation is the dominant mechanism of ACEI-induced renal vasodilation in hypertensives with NIDDM; and (3) the sustained renal hemodynamic responses to ACE inhibition despite high-salt balance, and the increased PRA suggest an autonomous renin-angiotensin system suppressed subnormally by a high salt diet in patients with NIDDM despite greater volume expansion. To determine the effect of moderate dietary sodium restriction on the hypertension of non-insulin-dependent (type II) diabetes.
                Randomised parallel controlled study of moderate sodium restriction for three months compared with usual diabetic diet, followed by randomised double blind crossover trial of sustained release preparation of sodium for one month versus placebo for one month in patients continuing with sodium restriction.
                Patients attending diabetic outpatient clinic of city hospital.
                Thirty four patients with established type II diabetes complicated by mild hypertension (systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic pressure greater than 95 mm Hg on three consecutive occasions). Patients already taking antihypertensive agents (but not diuretics) not barred from study provided that criteria for mild hypertension still met. Conditions precluding patients from study were diabetic or hypertensive nephropathy, cardiac failure, and pregnancy.
                After run in phase with recordings at seven weeks, three weeks, and time zero patients were allocated at random to receive moderate dietary sodium restriction for three months (n = 17) or to continue with usual diabetic diet. Subsequently nine patients in sodium restriction group continued with regimen for a further two months, during which they completed a randomised double blind crossover trial of sustained release preparation of sodium (Slow Sodium 80 mmol daily) for one month versus matching placebo for one month.
                Reduction in blood pressure in type II diabetics with mild hypertension.
                Supine and erect blood pressure, body weight, and 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion measured monthly during parallel group and double blind crossover studies. After parallel group study sodium restriction group showed significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (supine 19.2 mm Hg, erect 21.4 mm Hg; p less than 0.001) and mean daily urinary sodium excretion (mean reduction 60 mmol/24 h). There were no appreciable changes in weight, diabetic control, or diastolic pressure. No significant changes occurred in controls. In double blind crossover study mean supine systolic blood pressure rose significantly (p less than 0.005) during sodium supplementation (to 171 mm Hg) compared with value after three months of sodium restriction alone (159.9 mm Hg) and after one month of placebo (161.8 mm Hg).
                Moderate dietary restriction of sodium has a definite hypotensive effect, which may be useful in mild hypertension of type II diabetes. Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients may have an increased intrarenal angiotensin II activity. In diabetic patients, captopril increases the renal hemodynamic response to an amino acid infusion. We investigated the effects of two salt diets on arterial pressure and renal response to a protein load in 10 normotensive (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg) IDDM patients (aged 30 +/- 3 years) who had diabetes for 7 +/- 4 years and normoalbuminuria levels [albumin excretion rate 4.8 (2.5-19.1) microg/min]. After 1 week of normal (approximately 100 mmol/day; approximately 100 mEq/l) and 1 week of high (approximately 300 mmol/day; approximately 300 mEq/l) salt intake, renal hemodynamic studies were performed at baseline and after a protein load (meat meal) of 100 g/1.73 m2. The mean 24-hour urinary sodium excretion levels were 99 +/- 27 and 293 +/- 80 mmol (mEq) with normal and high salt intake, respectively. No significant changes were seen in plasma sodium and glucose control with the normal and high salt diets, respectively: plasma sodium 135 +/- 3 vs. 137 +/- 1 mmol/l (mEq/l), (p = 0.08) and glycated hemoglobin 9.1 +/- 1.9 vs. 9.4 +/- 2.1% (p = 0.36). The body weight (70.9 +/- 12 vs. 71.8 +/- 13 kg; p = 0.015) was significantly higher with a high salt diet. The mean arterial pressure was similar with both diets (normal vs. high salt diet 91 +/- 9 vs. 89 +/- 6 mm Hg, p = 0.25). The plasma renin concentration [28 +/- 15 vs. 16 +/- 6 microU/ml(168 +/- 90 vs. 96 +/- 36 pmol/l), p = 0.013] and angiotensin II [8.8 +/- 4.4 vs. 6.4 +/- 3.5 pg/ml (0.052 +/- 0.025 vs. 0.038 +/- 0.021 nmol/l), p = 0.016] were significantly lower with the high salt diet. Following protein loading, the glomerular filtration rate increased with both diets: normal salt diet 114 +/- 26 vs. 128 +/- 30 ml/min/1.73 m2(1.9 +/- 0.43 vs. 2.13 +/- 0.50 ml/s/1.73 m2), p = 0.04; high salt diet 118 +/- 23 vs. 127 +/- 29 ml/min/1.73 m2 (1.97 +/- 0.38 vs. 2.12 +/- 0.48 ml/s/1.73 m2), p = 0.13. The change in renal plasma flow was similar to that of the glomerular filtration rate with normal and high salt intake, respectively: 566 +/- 94 vs. 617 +/- 142 ml/min/1.73 m2 (9.44 +/- 1.57 vs. 10.29 +/- 2.37 ml/s/173 m2), p = 0.0017; 572 +/- 125 vs. 600 +/- 110 ml/min/1.73 m2 (9.54 +/- 2.08 vs. 10.00 +/- 1.83 ml/s/1.73 m2), p = 0.057. In this subset of normotensive normoalbuminuric IDDM patients, a high salt intake did not promote an exaggerated renal response to the protein load despite inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system. Increased GFR and decreased renal vascular resistance are common renal hemodynamic changes in persons with early, uncomplicated, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. It has been hypothesized that excess total-body sodium in patients with diabetes contributes to the renal vasodilation, possibly by suppressing vasoconstricting neurohormonal systems. This study was undertaken to examine whether sodium restriction could normalize these renal abnormalities. Subjects were 12 male patients with uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (duration, < 5 yr). Results were compared with those of an age- and gender-matched control group. All subjects received either a high-sodium diet (200 mmol/day) or a sodium-restricted diet (20 mmol/day) for 7 days, according to a randomized crossover protocol. GFR and RPF were measured using inulin and para-aminohippurate clearance techniques, respectively. Subjects with diabetes were maintained euglycemic during the clearance measurements. GFR was significantly higher in the diabetic group than in the control group with sodium repletion (124 +/- 4 versus 107 +/- 8 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.03), and renal vascular resistance was significantly reduced (94 +/- 6 versus 107 +/- 17 mm Hg/L/min; P = 0.05). In response to sodium restriction, the hematocrit increased significantly in both groups, as did PRA and aldosterone, although responses in the diabetic group were somewhat blunted, indicating persisting volume expansion. Despite this humoral activation, sodium restriction had little effect on renal hemodynamic function in control subjects. In the diabetic subjects, this maneuver appeared to exacerbate the underlying renal abnormalities, with the GFR increasing to 131 +/- 4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.05) and the renal vascular resistance declining to 73 +/- 5 mm Hg/L/min (P = 0.001). These data indicate that, rather than correcting renal hyperperfusion, sodium restriction exacerbates these characteristic abnormalities, suggesting that mechanisms other than suppression of vasoconstrictor activity are operative in the underlying renal hemodynamic abnormalities of early, uncomplicated, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. We assessed blood pressure (BP), body weight, renal hemodynamics, and insulin sensitivity (by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp) in nine normoalbuminuric and seven microalbuminuric IDDM patients after 6 days on a low-sodium diet (20 mEq) and after 6 days on a high-sodium diet (250 mEq). In microalbuminuric but not in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients, switching from a low to a high-sodium diet was associated with a significant increase in mean BP (from 92 +/- 3 to 101 +/- 4 mmHg; P < 0.001) and in body weight (2.91 +/- 0.63 vs. 1.47 +/- 0.26 kg; P < 0.05). Moreover, under high-sodium conditions, angiotensin II infusion (3 ng x kg(-1) x min(-1)) caused a greater increase in mean BP (14 +/- 2 vs. 7.4 +/- 1 mmHg; P < 0.05) and a smaller reduction in renal plasma flow (-122 +/- 29 vs. -274 +/- 41 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m2; P < 0.05) in microalbuminuric than in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients. Under low sodium conditions, aldosterone increments after angiotensin II infusion were lower (P < 0.05) in microalbuminuric than in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients. Insulin-mediated glucose disposal was not affected by sodium dietary content, but it was lower in microalbuminuric (P < 0.05) than in normoalbuminuric IDDM patients. The salt-induced changes in mean BP were related to insulin sensitivity (r = -0.78; P < 0.001). In conclusion, in IDDM patients, microalbuminuria is associated with 1) an increased responsiveness of BP to salt intake and angiotensin II, 2) impaired modulation of renal blood flow, and 3) insulin resistance. Therefore, salt sensitivity in IDDM patients clusters with other factors that are likely to play an important role in the pathogenesis of diabetic nephropathy and its cardiovascular complications. To find whether sodium sensitivity of blood pressure appears before hypertension and whether the sensitivity is related to diabetic nephropathy, we examined type 2 diabetic patients with normal levels of serum creatinine.
                A total of 32 patients were divided into three age-matched groups: 11 patients had normoalbuminuria, 12 had microalbuminuria, and 9 had macroalbuminuria. Patients stayed on a diet with ordinary sodium levels for 1 week and a sodium-restricted diet for 1 week, in random order. Urinary excretion of sodium and albumin and systemic blood pressure were measured daily. A pressure-natriuresis curve was drawn by linkage of the two datum points obtained in the steady state during the different diets. We calculated the sodium sensitivity index as the reciprocal of the slope of this curve.
                The median sodium sensitivity index and the mean blood pressure were higher in micro- and macroalbuminuric patients than in normoalbuminuric patients. Eighteen patients were without hypertension (<140/90 mmHg); of these, 10 had blood pressure readings <130/85 mmHg with ordinary sodium levels. Urinary albumin was correlated with the index but not with blood pressure. For these 10 patients, the index in those with albuminuria was higher than in those with normoalbuminuria. In such patients with albuminuria, sodium restriction decreased albuminuria and blood pressure.
                In type 2 diabetic patients with albuminuria but normal levels of serum creatinine, sodium sensitivity of blood pressure appears before hypertension and is related to albuminuria; sodium restriction is one treatment for diabetic nephropath, even without hypertension. Uncomplicated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) is associated with a suppressed reflex response to sympathetic nervous system (SNS) stimulation and an enhanced pressor response to catecholamines. This study examined the SNS in subjects with IDDM (duration < 5 yr, n = 9) to determine the responsible mechanism within the cardiopulmonary baroreflex arc and the role played by extracellular fluid volume (ECFV) expansion. The reflex arc was tested by examining the plasma norepinephrine (PNE) and forearm vascular (FVR) responses to 60 min of cardiopulmonary baroreceptor unloading by lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -15 mmHg. The effector limb was tested by measuring the PNE, FVR, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) response to the cold pressor test (CPT). The postganglionic neuroeffector junction was tested by measuring the venoconstrictive response to local norepinephrine infusion. ECFV was varied by altering dietary sodium. In IDDM subjects on a 250 mmol sodium diet, PNE and FVR responses to LBNP (delta PNE = 0.15 +/- 0.05; delta FVR = 4.3 +/- 1.2) were attenuated compared with controls (delta PNE = 0.36 +/- 0.23; delta FVR = 11.56 +/- 2.72). MAP and FVR responses to the CPT were intact (delta MAP = 9.74 +/- 1.9; delta FVR = 7.02 +/- 3.11) compared with controls (delta MAP = 10.74 +/- 2.69; delta FVR = 8.26 +/- 2.94), but the PNE response was attenuated. The peripheral vasculature was hyperresponsive to norepinephrine infusion in IDDM subjects [mean effective dose (ED50) = 57 +/- 10 ng/min] compared with controls (ED50 = 133 +/- 30 ng/min). Sodium restriction (20 mmol/day) normalized the FVR response to LBNP and the venous response to norepinephrine infusion. The PNE response both to LBNP and the CPT remained attenuated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The objectives of the study were to assess the effects of moderate sodium restriction on blood pressure in insulin-dependent diabetic (IDDM) patients with nephropathy and high normal or mildly hypertensive blood pressure (primary objective), and to document possible associated changes of exchangeable body sodium, body volumes, components of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, atrial natriuretic peptide, and catecholamines (secondary objective). Sixteen patients with untreated systolic blood pressure > or = 140 < 160 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure > or = 85 < 100 mmHg were included in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. After a 4-week run-in period on their usual diet and a 2-week dietary training period to reduce sodium intake to about 90 mmol/day, eight patients received 100 mmol/day sodium supplement (group 2) and eight patients a matching placebo (group 1) for 4 weeks while continuing on the reduced-sodium diet. Patients were examined at weekly intervals. Main response variables were mean values of supine and sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure as measured in the clinic and by the patients at home. The differences in blood pressure between the beginning and the end of the blinded 4-week study period were calculated and the differences in changes between the two patient groups were regarded as the main outcome parameters. During the blinded 4-week study period, average urinary sodium excretion was 92 +/- 33 (mean +/- SD) mmol/day in group 1 and 199 +/- 52 mmol/day in group 2 (p = 0.0002). The differences in blood pressure changes between the two patient groups were 3.9(-1.2 to 9) mmHg [mean (95% confidence intervals)] for systolic home blood pressure, 0.9(-3.7 to 5.5) mmHg for diastolic home blood pressure, 4.9(-3.3 to 13.1) mmHg for clinic systolic blood pressure and 5.3(1 to 9.7 mmHg, p = 0.02) for clinic diastolic blood pressure. Combining all patients, there were relevant associations between changes of urinary sodium excretion and blood volume (Spearman correlation coefficient r = 0.57), blood pressure and angiotensin II (diastolic: r = -0.7; systolic: r = -0.48), and exchangeable body sodium and renin activity (r = -0.5). In conclusion, in this study of IDDM patients with nephropathy and high normal or mildly hypertensive blood pressure, a difference in sodium intake of about 100 mmol/day for a period of 4 weeks led to a slight reduction of clinic diastolic blood pressure. Studies including larger numbers of patients with various stages of nephropathy and hypertension are needed to definitely clarify the effects of sodium restriction in IDDM. Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased extracellular volume. Sodium restriction might seem a logical form of treatment but data on its renal effects is conflicting. We therefore studied the effects of sodium restriction on renal haemodynamics in uncomplicated Type I diabetes mellitus.
                Uncomplicated Type I diabetic patients ( n = 24) and matched control subjects ( n = 24) were studied twice in random order: after a week of 50 mmol or after 200 mmol sodium intake, respectively. The diabetic patients were studied under normoglycaemic clamp conditions. Glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow were measured as the clearances of iothalamate and hippuran, respectively.
                During liberal sodium intake, glomerular filtration, effective renal plasma flow and filtration fraction were similar between the diabetic patients and the control subjects. Sodium restriction decreased the effective renal plasma flow in both groups, whereas glomerular filtration rate only decreased in the control subjects. Consequently, in the diabetic patients, the filtration fraction was increased on low sodium (4.1 +/- 8.4 %, p < 0.05 vs liberal sodium). As a consequence, filtration fraction (24.0 +/- 2.6 vs 22.1 +/- 2.0 %, p < 0.05) and glomerular filtration (119 +/- 14 vs 110 +/- 13 ml/min, p < 0.05) were higher in the diabetic patients than in the control subjects during sodium restriction.
                Short-term moderate sodium restriction induces relative hyperfiltration in uncomplicated Type I diabetes. This could indicate an increased intraglomerular pressure. Sodium restriction could be an unfavourable preventive approach in diabetes mellitus but its long-term effects are not known.
Although the studies are not extensive, this meta-analysis shows a large fall in BP with salt restriction, similar to that of single drug therapy. All diabetics should consider reducing salt intake at least to less than 5-6 g/day in keeping with current recommendations for the general population and may consider lowering salt intake to lower levels, although further studies are needed.