Strategy aimed at reduction of sputum eosinophils decreases exacerbation rate in patients with asthma. Asthma exacerbations and sputum eosinophil counts: a randomised controlled trial. Determining asthma treatment by monitoring sputum cell counts: effect on exacerbations.
Under Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines, the clinical control of disease activity and the adjustment of treatment in patients with asthma are based on symptoms, use of rescue medication, lung function and peak expiratory flow measurement (standard strategy). We investigated whether a strategy to reduce the number of sputum eosinophils (EOS strategy) gives better clinical control and a lower exacerbation rate compared with the standard strategy. Fifty-five patients with moderate to severe asthma entered this open, randomized, parallel-group study and visited the out-patient department every 3 months for 18 months. The dose of corticosteroids was adjusted according to the standard strategy or the percentage of sputum eosinophils (EOS strategy). During the study period, the EOS strategy led to a significantly lower incidence of asthma exacerbations compared with the standard strategy group (0.22 and 0.78 exacerbations per year per patient, respectively). There were significant differences between the strategies in time to first exacerbation. Treatment decisions in asthma are based on assessments of symptoms and simple measures of lung function, which do not relate closely to underlying eosinophilic airway inflammation. We aimed to assess whether a management strategy that minimises eosinophilic inflammation reduces asthma exacerbations compared with a standard management strategy.
                We recruited 74 patients with moderate to severe asthma from hospital clinics and randomly allocated them to management either by standard British Thoracic Society asthma guidelines (BTS management group) or by normalisation of the induced sputum eosinophil count and reduction of symptoms (sputum management group). We assessed patients nine times over 12 months. The results were used to manage those in the sputum management group, but were not disclosed in the BTS group. The primary outcomes were the number of severe exacerbations and control of eosinophilic inflammation, measured by induced sputum eosinophil count. Analyses were by intention to treat.
                The sputum eosinophil count was 63% (95% CI 24-100) lower over 12 months in the sputum management group than in the BTS management group (p=0.002). Patients in the sputum management group had significantly fewer severe asthma exacerbations than did patients in the BTS management group (35 vs 109; p=0.01) and significantly fewer patients were admitted to hospital with asthma (one vs six, p=0.047). The average daily dose of inhaled or oral corticosteroids did not differ between the two groups.
                A treatment strategy directed at normalisation of the induced sputum eosinophil count reduces asthma exacerbations and admissions without the need for additional anti-inflammatory treatment. One important goal of asthma treatment is to reduce exacerbations. The current authors investigated if the use of sputum cell counts to guide treatment would achieve this goal. A total of 117 adults with asthma were entered into a multicentre, randomised, parallel group-effectiveness study for two treatment strategies over a 2-yr period. In one strategy (the clinical strategy: CS) treatment was based on symptoms and spirometry. In the other (the sputum strategy: SS) sputum cell counts were used to guide corticosteroid therapy to keep eosinophils<or=2%; symptoms and spirometry were used to identify clinical control, exacerbations and other treatments. Patients were blind to sputum cell counts in both strategies and physicians were blind in the CS, thus removing bias. First, the minimum treatment to maintain control was identified in 107 patients (Phase 1) and then this treatment was continued (Phase 2) for the remaining of the 2 yrs. The primary outcomes were the relative risk reduction for the occurrence of the first exacerbation in Phase 2 and the length of time without exacerbation. The current authors also examined the type and severity of exacerbations and the cumulative dose of inhaled steroid needed. The duration and number of exacerbations in Phase 1 were similar in both groups. In Phase 2 there were a 126 exacerbations of which 79 occurred in the CS (62.7%) and 47 (37.3%) in the SS groups. The majority of the 126 exacerbations (101; 80.1%) were mild. The majority of the 102 exacerbations, where sputum examination was performed before any treatment (n=70), were noneosinophilic. In the SS patients, the time to the first exacerbation was longer (by 213 days) especially in those considered to need treatment with a long acting beta2-agonist (by 490 days), the relative risk ratio was lower (by 49%), and the number of exacerbations needing prednisone was reduced (5 versus 15). This benefit was seen mainly in patients needing treatment with inhaled steroid in a daily dose equivalent to fluticasone>250 microg, and was due to fewer eosinophilic exacerbations. The cumulative dose of corticosteroid during the trial was similar in both groups. Monitoring sputum cell counts was found to benefit patients with moderate-to-severe asthma by reducing the number of eosinophilic exacerbations and by reducing the severity of both eosinophilic and noneosinophilic exacerbations without increasing the total corticosteroid dose. It had no influence on the frequency of noneosinophilic exacerbations, which were the most common exacerbations.
Tailored asthma interventions based on sputum eosinophils is beneficial in reducing the frequency of asthma exacerbations in adults with asthma. This review supports the use of sputum eosinophils to tailor asthma therapy for adults with frequent exacerbations and severe asthma. Further studies need to be undertaken to strengthen these results and no conclusion can be drawn for children with asthma.