Tacrolimus and steroids versus ciclosporin microemulsion, steroids, and azathioprine in children undergoing liver transplantation: randomised European multicentre trial. Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with tacrolimus versus Neoral after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus versus microemulsified ciclosporin in liver transplantation: the TMC randomised controlled trial. A pilot study of immunosuppressive monotherapy in liver transplantation: tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin. A randomised trial comparing the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus with microemulsified cyclosporine after liver transplantation. Prednisone withdrawal 14 days after liver transplantation with mycophenolate: a prospective trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with neoral or tacrolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation. Impact of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in hepatitis C virus-infected liver transplant recipients on recurrent hepatitis: a prospective, randomized trial. A randomized trial of primary liver transplantation under immunosuppression with FK 506 vs cyclosporine. Cardiac function after orthotopic liver transplantation and the effects of immunosuppression: a prospective randomized trial comparing cyclosporin (Neoral) and tacrolimus. Comparison of tacrolimus with microemulsion cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression in hepatitis C patients after liver transplantation. Early steroid withdrawal after liver transplantation: the Canadian tacrolimus versus microemulsion cyclosporin A trial: 1-year follow-up. Randomised trial comparing tacrolimus (FK506) and cyclosporin in prevention of liver allograft rejection. European FK506 Multicentre Liver Study Group.
Results of studies in adult recipients of liver allograft suggest that tacrolimus is more efficacious than ciclosporin microemulsion in the prevention of acute rejection. We aimed to compare these drugs in children undergoing liver transplantation.
                This 12-month multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised study compared a dual tacrolimus regimen (tacrolimus/corticosteroids, n=93) with a triple ciclosporin microemulsion regimen (ciclosporin microemulsion/corticosteroids/azathioprine, n=92) in children who had had liver transplants (age < or =16 years, bodyweight < or =40 kg). Initial oral daily doses were 0.30 mg/kg for tacrolimus and 10 mg/kg for ciclosporin microemulsion. Primary endpoint was the incidence of and time to first histologically proven acute rejection. We excluded patients from analysis if they did not receive the study drug, or were given incorrect medication. Otherwise patients were analysed in accordance with their random treatment allocation, irrespective of whether they switched medication during the trial.
                Median age was 22 months (IQR 9-56) in the tacrolimus group and 17 months (9-54) in the ciclosporin microemulsion group. We noted no difference between treatment groups with respect to patient survival (93.4% vs 92.2%; p=0.77) or graft survival (92.3% vs 85.4%; p=0.16) at month 12 after transplant. The acute rejection free rate at study end (Kaplan-Meier method) was 55.5% for patients on tacrolimus and 40.2% for patients on ciclosporin microemulsion (p=0.0288). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of patients free from corticosteroid-resistant acute rejection at study end was 94.0% for tacrolimus-treated patients and 70.4% for ciclosporin-microemulsion-treated patients (p<0.0001). Overall, incidence of adverse events did not differ between groups.
                Tacrolimus is a safe and effective treatment for the prevention of rejection after liver transplantation in children. nan Calcineurin inhibitors are the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs in liver transplantation, but the optimum initial immunosuppression regimen is not known. The aim of our study was to compare tacrolimus with microemulsified ciclosporin, in a regimen with standardised concomitant immunosuppressive therapy.
                In all liver transplant centres in the UK and Republic of Ireland, 606 patients undergoing a first orthotopic liver transplantation were randomly assigned open-label tacrolimus or microemulsified ciclosporin. Primary outcome was the combined frequency (whichever occurred first) of death, retransplantation, or treatment failure for immunological reasons, analysed by intention to treat.
                96% of patients received the treatment allocated to them. The primary outcome was reached in 62 (21%) of 301 patients in the tacrolimus group versus 99 (32%) of 305 allocated microemulsified ciclosporin (relative risk 0.63 [95% CI 0.48-0.84], p=0.001; time-to-event analysis log-rank test p=0.002): deaths (50 [17%] vs 72 [24%]); retransplantations (11 [4%] vs 31 [10%]) treatment failure for immunological reasons (6 [2%] vs 12 [4%]). The relative risk for the composite outcome was in favour of tacrolimus. The main causes of death in both trial groups were sepsis and multiple organ failure (31 [10%] vs 30 [10%]), and the main cause for retransplantation was hepatic artery thrombosis (6 [2%] vs 17 [6%]). Renal dysfunction and the need for antihypertensive therapy were much the same in both groups. Tacrolimus was more diabetogenic.
                Clinical outcome at 1 year was better with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression than with microemulsified ciclosporin during the first year after liver transplantation. Tacrolimus should be the first choice of calcineurin inhibitor for patients receiving their first liver graft. Many reports of successful early withdrawal of regular maintenance steroids in transplant recipients have appeared in recent years. The question now arises whether, in the current age of powerful nonsteroidal immunosuppressants such as Neoral and Tacrolimus, routine administration of steroids posttransplant is necessary at all. This single center pilot study reports on the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of single agent immunosuppression "ab initio" with either Neoral or Tacrolimus, and no routine or maintenance steroids.
                A total of 64 adult patients receiving first liver grafts for a variety of indications were randomized to receive either Neoral 5 mg/kg BDS or Tacrolimus 0.05 mg/kg BDS orally. Liver biopsies were performed on postoperative days 5 and 10, and whenever else clinically indicated. Rejection episodes were treated with 1.0 g of Methylprednisolone daily for 3 consecutive days. A further episode of rejection after two courses of Methylprednisolone was considered to be monotherapy failure, and consequently other immunosuppressive agents, usually Prednisolone 1 mg/kg/day, was started on a regular basis, tapering slowly.
                Actuarial 1 year survival was 85% for Tacrolimus patients, and 78% for Neoral patients (P = NS), with 80% for Tacrolimus and 73.5% for Neoral at 30 months. Graft survival at 1 and 2.5 years was 73 and 62% for Tacrolimus and Neoral, respectively (P = NS). Two-thirds of patients in both groups showed biopsy evidence of acute cellular rejection. Rejection severity measured by a histological scoring system was similar for both patient groups. Additional longterm immunosuppressive therapy was necessary in 36% of patients receiving Neoral, compared with 13% of Tacrolimus patients (P = NS). No graft was lost on account of acute or chronic rejection. Short-term pulse steroid therapy to treat acute rejection was necessary for 60% of Tacrolimus patients and 40% of Neoral patients.
                Tacrolimus or Neoral monotherapy after liver transplantation provides adequate immunosuppression for 87% of Tacrolimus patients and 64% of Neoral patients. In this study, 33% of patients in both groups showed no evidence of acute rejection, either clinically, biochemically or histologically, and were not exposed to steroids at any time. Evaluation of the long-term morbidity related to the side effects of the immunosuppressants given as monotherapy, for example, renal impairment and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and the effect on recurrent viral hepatitis in the graft, would be suitable areas for further study. nan The long-term complications of immunosuppressive therapy such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are a major source of morbidity in liver transplant recipients. In this prospective, randomized, open-label study we completely withdrew prednisone (PRED) 14 days after liver transplantation in an effort to decrease these metabolic complications. Patients were maintained on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in combination with either cyclosporine (CsA; Neoral formulation) or tacrolimus (TAC). Thus, we also were able to compare CsA to TAC in patients not receiving PRED with respect to efficacy, toxicity, and effect on posttransplant metabolic complications.
                A total of 71 patients were randomized to receive either TAC-MMF (n=35) or CsA-MMF (n=36) after liver transplantation and were analyzed for patient and graft survival. Fifty-eight patients continued the immunosuppressive protocol for at least 6 months after transplantation and were analyzed for the incidence of acute rejection and the prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia.
                The 6-month patient survival rates were 94.4% for CsA-MMF and 88.6% for TAC-MMF. Corresponding 6-month graft survival rates were 88.7% and 85.71% with no immunologic graft losses in either group. The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection was 46% for CsA-MMF and 42.3% for TAC-MMF. Six patients were converted from CsA to TAC (four for recurrent rejection) and seven patients were converted from TAC to CsA (four for neurotoxicity). Only one patient (in the TAC-MMF group) developed new-onset posttransplant diabetes. In contrast, four of eight patients in the CsA-MMF group who were diabetic before transplant became nondiabetic in the first 3 months after transplant. The mean serum cholesterol level was significantly lower in the TAC-MMF group than in the CsA-MMF group (145.2+/-41.8 mg/dl and 190.3+/-62.2, respectively; P<0.001) and the incidence of hypertension was lower in the TAC-MMF group (12% vs. 30.3% in the CsA-MMF group, P<0.01). Both groups had a lower incidence of metabolic complications compared with a historical group (n=100) maintained on CsA and PRED (10 mg/day at 6 months).
                MMF in combination with either TAC or CsA allows withdrawal of PRED 14 days after liver transplantation with a moderate rejection rate and no immunologic graft losses. Early PRED withdrawal decreases posttransplant diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension, but patients maintained on TAC have lower serum cholesterol levels and a lower incidence of hypertension than CsA-treated patients. The success of liver transplantation in this decade has become the stimulus to extend the donor and recipient pool. Reducing early posttransplant morbidity to maintain our success, as we expand our frontiers, has led us to focus on balanced testing of multidrug immunosuppression regimens.
                A prospective trial in orthotopic liver transplantation using Mycophenolate Mofetil and an identical steroid taper with randomization of patients to Neoral (N) or Tacrolimus (FK) is the basis of this report. This was an intent-to-treat study designed to compare the 6-month primary endpoints of rejection and infection and to compare the 6-month secondary endpoints of liver function, renal function, bone marrow function, hypertension, and serum cholesterol levels.
                Ninety-seven patients completed the 6-month follow-up period (N=49, FK=48). The actual 6-month patient and graft survival rates were 98% and 94%, respectively. There was no difference in the number of patients with rejection episodes (N=11, FK=8) (P=0.61). There were 24 infections (3 cytomegalovirus) in the FK group and 30 infections (9 cytomegalovirus) in the N group. The cholesterol levels at 6 months were not significantly different (P=0.07) between the groups. The other secondary 6-month endpoints were not significantly different, except total bilirubin, which was lower in the FK arm (P=0.02).
                The use of Mycophenolate Mofetil with N or FK and an identical steroid taper after orthotopic liver transplantation is associated with excellent graft and patient survival, and at 6 months, only 191% of the patients experienced rejection, with a 48% overall infection rate. Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced cirrhosis is the commonest indication for orthotopic liver transplantation, but HCV recurrence is nearly universal and may worsen patient / graft outcomes. The frequency and severity of HCV recurrence has apparently increased in recent years, raising concern about a possible role for newer immunosuppression regimens in this increase, including potentially tacrolimus. We randomized 79 patients to receive tacrolimus or cyclosporine as primary immunosuppressant posttransplantation. A pathologist blinded to treatment reviewed serial liver biopsies. Month 12 cumulative probabilities of histological hepatitis C recurrence for tacrolimus- and cyclosporine-treated patients were .38 and .54 (P = .19) and failure / death were .25 and .28, respectively (P = .789). Although cyclosporine-treated patients had significantly larger increases in median serum HCV RNA levels (months 1, 6, and 12), no significant differences were observed between the two treatment arms in histologically-diagnosed HCV recurrence / survival rates. In conclusion, choice of calcineurin inhibitors does not impact severity of recurrent HCV. nan There are several case reports in the literature that describe cardiac complications in the first few weeks after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in patients receiving tacrolimus as their primary immunosuppressive therapy. In this study, we investigated the cardiac function of patients on tacrolimus (T) compared with those on cyclosporin (C) (Neoral; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) immunosuppression, after OLT, in a prospective randomized trial. We randomized 40 adult patients with cirrhosis to either T or C with azathioprine and prednisolone immunosuppression and followed up on them for 3 months after OLT. All had detailed clinical, biochemical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic assessments at regular intervals. Abnormalities in cardiac function were common after OLT and significant deterioration in left ventricular diastolic function was demonstrable up to 3 months in both patient groups. Cardiac function was similar in the T and C arms and no significant electrocardiographic differences were observed, although reduced heart rate variability (HRV) and higher mean serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were identified in the T group. The percentage increase in posterior wall thickness was higher in the T group. Cardiac dysfunction as shown by worsening echocardiographic measures of left ventricular diastolic function and by clinical cardiac events is common in the first 3 months after OLT in patients with cirrhosis. HRV and BNP values in the T group were worse than in the C group, but this was not translated to an increase in cardiac clinical events in this study. Immunosuppression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) following orthotopic liver transplantation can lead to significant increases in serum viral loads. Our aim was to analyze the effect of a randomized study of two immunosuppressive agents (tacrolimus vs. microemulsion cyclosporine) on the outcome of HCV patients following orthotopic liver transplantation.
                From December 1995 to September 1996, 50 adult patients transplanted for HCV cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive tacrolimus (Prograf) (group 1, 25 patients) or microemulsion cyclosporine (Neoral) (group 2, 24 patients). All patients received alpha-interferon after transplantation, and the overall steroid doses were no different between the groups. Serum RNA levels were measured by signal amplification of Chiron. Biopsies were taken when transaminases were greater than 2x base line or when there was an inappropriate response to alterations in immunosuppression regimens.
                There were more episodes of rejection in the Neoral group, but there were no differences in bacterial and viral infections, nor in the rate of HCV recurrence between the two groups. There were seven deaths in group 1 and eight in group 2. Overall patient and graft survival rates in the Prograf and Neoral groups at 18 months were 72 and 68% and 67 and 64%, respectively.
                (a) Both immunosuppression regimens had similar HCV recurrence rates; (b) there were no differences in bacterial or opportunistic infections; and (c) patient and graft survival was similar between the two groups. Corticosteroid therapy contributes significant toxicity to liver transplantation. The safety and efficacy of early steroid withdrawal were determined in patients treated with either tacrolimus or microemulsion cyclosporin A (micro-CsA). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who were steroid-free 1 year posttransplantation. From the seven Canadian adult liver transplant centers, 143 patients were randomly allocated oral treatment with either tacrolimus (n = 71) or micro-CsA (n = 72), together with corticosteroids and azathioprine. Eligibility criteria for steroid withdrawal included freedom from acute rejection for a minimum of 3 months, and prednisone </=0.15 mg/kg/d. In eligible patients, the daily steroid dose was reduced by 2.5 mg each month until complete discontinuation was achieved. At 1 year after transplantation, 75% of the tacrolimus patients and 63% of the micro-CsA patients were steroid-free (P =.20). Of all of the patients who became eligible for steroid withdrawal, steroid discontinuation was achieved in over 80%. One-year patient survival was 97% with tacrolimus and 89% with micro-CsA (P =.052). Graft survival was 97% and 86%, respectively (P =.017). The overall incidence of acute rejection during the first year was 35% with tacrolimus and 43% with micro-CsA (P =.26). There was no difference in survival, acute rejection, or rate of steroid withdrawal when adjusting for hepatitis C. All acute rejection episodes experienced during steroid withdrawal were steroid-responsive. Steroid-resistant rejection occurred in 5.6% of the tacrolimus and 9.7% of the micro-CsA patients. One patient, in the micro-CsA group, experienced refractory rejection. Chronic rejection was not observed in either group. The toxicity profiles were similar. Postoperative serum creatinine levels were similar, and dialysis was required in less than 10% of patients in each group. Infectious complications were similar in both groups. Neurotoxicity was a serious adverse event in 13% and 10% of patients receiving tacrolimus and micro-CsA, respectively. Early steroid withdrawal is safe and effective after liver transplantation using either tacrolimus plus azathioprine or micro-CsA plus azathioprine immunoprophylaxis. Studies in the USA and Japan have shown that tacrolimus (FK506) is a potent immunosuppressant. To compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus-based and conventional cyclosporin-based immunosuppressive regimens we recruited 545 liver transplant recipients from eight European centres into a randomised open trial. Analysis of the data at 12 months post-transplant showed that tacrolimus was associated with a significant reduction in acute, refractory acute, and chronic rejection episodes. The rates were, for acute rejection, tacrolimus 40.5% vs 49.8% cyclosporin (p = 0.040; absolute difference 9.3% [95% CI 0.9-17.8%]). For refractory acute and chronic rejections the comparisons were 0.8% vs 5.3% (p = 0.005) and 1.5% vs 5.3% (p = 0.032). There results were seen despite significantly lower corticosteroid usage. The incidence of infection was also lower in patients receiving tacrolimus. Patient and graft survival rates were not significantly different (tacrolimus 82.9% and 77.5%; cyclosporin 77.5% and 72.6%). Safety data were comparable--the most serious events being renal impairment, disturbances of glucose metabolism, and neurological complications--but these events were more common in the tacrolimus group. In this trial tacrolimus had advantages over cyclosporin in respect of lower rejection rates, even though less concurrent immunosuppression was administered.
Tacrolimus is superior to cyclosporin in improving survival (patient and graft) and preventing acute rejection after liver transplantation, but it increases the risk of post-transplant diabetes. Treating 100 recipients with tacrolimus instead of cyclosporin would avoid acute rejection and steroid-resistant rejection in nine and seven patients, respectively, and graft loss and death in five and two patients, respectively, but four additional patients would develop diabetes after liver transplantation.