The effects of family involvement and practitioner home visits on the control of hypertension. Improving compliance with therapeutic regimens in hypertensive patients in a community health center. Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension. Pharmaceutical care program for patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Report of a double-blind clinical trial with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Nurse management for hypertension. A systems approach. The effects of self-monitoring by patients on the control of hypertension. Improving hypertension control: impact of computer feedback and physician education. Evaluation of two educative models in a primary care hypertension programme. Evaluation of the IMPACT blood pressure program. Impact on hypertension control of a patient-held guideline: a randomised controlled trial. Self-recording of blood pressure in the management of hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring. Effect on use of medical services and medical care costs. Using nurses for preventive activities with computer assisted follow up: a randomised controlled trial. Effect of pharmacist intervention and initiation of home blood pressure monitoring in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Home blood pressure monitoring for mild hypertensives. Evaluation of a structured treatment and teaching programme on hypertension in general practice. Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension. Effectiveness of a two-part educational intervention to improve hypertension control: a cluster-randomized trial. Nurse-led adherence support in hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Pharmacist involvement in primary care improves hypertensive patient clinical outcomes. Home monitoring service improves mean arterial pressure in patients with essential hypertension. A randomized, controlled trial. Randomised clinical trial of strategies for improving medication compliance in primary hypertension. Evaluation of a nurse-run hypertension clinic in general practice. Linking community-based blood pressure measurement to clinical care: a randomized controlled trial of outreach and tracking by community health workers. The effect of instruction on control of blood pressure in individuals with essential hypertension. Therapeutic control of blood pressure in the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Improving blood pressure control in diabetes: limitations of a clinical reminder in influencing physician behavior. A randomized trial to improve follow-up care in severe uncontrolled hypertensives at an inner-city walk-in clinic. From screening to seeking care: removing obstacles in hypertension control. Comprehensive pharmaceutical care in the chain setting. Antihypertensive drug treatment: a comparison of usual care with self blood pressure measurement. Five-year findings of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. I. Reduction in mortality of persons with high blood pressure, including mild hypertension. Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Group. Management of hypertension. Effect of improving patient compliance for follow-up care. Improving hypertension control in a private medical practice. Effect of nurse-directed hypertension treatment among First Nations people with existing hypertension and diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Risk Evaluation and Microalbuminuria (DREAM 3) randomized controlled trial. Treatment of hypertension by computer and physician-a prospective controlled study. Screening, treatment and adherence to treatment for hypertension. Effect of nurse counselling on metabolic risk factors in patients with mild hypertension: a randomised controlled trial. The effect of treatment on mortality in "mild" hypertension: results of the hypertension detection and follow-up program. Self-monitoring of blood pressure promotes achievement of blood pressure target in primary health care. A multimethod quality improvement intervention to improve preventive cardiovascular care: a cluster randomized trial. A telecommunications system for monitoring and counseling patients with hypertension. Impact on medication adherence and blood pressure control. A randomized study comparing a patient-directed hypertension management strategy with usual office-based care. The impact of a patient education programme in the control of hypertension. A controlled trial of health education in the physician's office. Does free care improve adults' health? Results from a randomized controlled trial. A randomized controlled trial of an information booklet for hypertensive patients in general practice. Effects of home telemonitoring and community-based monitoring on blood pressure control in urban African Americans: a pilot study. A computer-based monitoring system for follow-up of elevated blood pressure. Efficacy of telephone and mail intervention in patient compliance with antihypertensive drugs in hypertension. ETECUM-HTA study. Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial. Electronic monitoring of adherence as a tool to improve blood pressure control. A randomized controlled trial. Randomised controlled trial of computer assisted management of hypertension in primary care. Pragmatic randomized trial of home visits by a nurse to elderly people with hypertension in Mexico. Physicians' management of hypertension: a randomized controlled CME trial. Health education for hypertensive patients. Influence of self-measurement of blood pressure on the responder rate in hypertensive patients treated with losartan: results of the SVATCH Study. Standard vs Automatic Treatment Control of COSAAR in Hypertension. Does a mailed continuing education program improve physician performance? Results of a randomized trial in antihypertensive care. Work-site treatment of hypertension by specially trained nurses. A controlled trial. Use of a standardized personal medical record by patients with hypertension: a randomized controlled prospective trial. Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system. Randomized controlled trial on lifestyle modification in hypertensive patients. Five-year blood pressure control and mortality following health education for hypertensive patients. Effectiveness of patient education and psychosocial counseling in promoting compliance and control among hypertensive patients. Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. An appointment reminder system's effect on reducing the number of hypertension patients who drop out from care. Impact of educational mailing on the blood pressure of primary care patients with mild hypertension. Targets and self monitoring in hypertension: randomised controlled trial and cost effectiveness analysis. Educational outreach in diabetes to encourage practice nurses to use primary care hypertension and hyperlipidaemia guidelines (EDEN): a randomized controlled trial.
The effectiveness of two social support strategies designed to lower hypertensive patients' blood pressure were compared to each other and to a control group (N = 63) receiving routine care in a randomized clinical trial extending over a period of two years. Group 1 (N = 99) received visits and had family members actively participate in their care through home blood pressure monitoring; Group 2 (N = 56) received home visits from nurses and pharmacists. All groups were predominantly Black. After the first year of the trial, the proportion of patients with uncontrolled diastolic blood pressure (greater than or equal to 95mm Hg) had declined significantly for all three groups; no group showed a statistically significant advantage. However, during the last six months of the second year (after visiting had ended), both Groups 1 and 2 demonstrated clear superiority in DBP control over Group 3, achieving borderline statistical significance (p = .07) when multivariable analysis was performed to control for potential confounders. Supplementing routine care with periodic home visits produced an additional 21 per cent of patients with well-controlled DBP, while involving family members plus visits produced a 17 per cent improvement in the percentage of patients with DBP less than 95mm Hg. However, neither support strategy was clearly more effective than the other over time. The efficacy of the interventions is discussed with respect to cost and feasibility of implementation. A 1-year, randomized study was conducted to test the possibility of improving compliance with therapeutic regimens in hypertensives by means of certain simple arrangements. Patients were given written treatment instructions concerning hypertension, a personal blood-pressure follow-up card, and, for those who failed to attend their blood-pressure check-up, an invitation for a new check-up. Using matched pairs, 202 Finnish hypertensives were randomly allocated either to an ordinary or a reorganized treatment group. By means of the latter system, patient compliance could be significantly (p less than 0.01) improved: Only 4% of the patients in this group dropped out of treatment, compared with 19% in the ordinary treatment group. By the end of the year, blood pressure had been lowered by at least 10% in 95% of the patients in the reorganized group and in 78% of those in the ordinary group (p less than 0.01). This was achieved in approximately 60% of cases using chlorthalidone alone. To assess the effect of a physician and pharmacist teamwork approach to uncontrolled hypertension in a medical resident teaching clinic, for patients who failed to meet the recommended goals of the fifth Joint National Commission on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
                Physician and pharmacist teamwork can improve the rate of meeting national blood pressure goals in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension.
                A single-blinded randomized controlled trial lasting 6 months.
                A primary care outpatient teaching clinic.
                A sample of 95 adult hypertensive patients who failed to meet national blood pressure goals based on three consecutive visits over a 6-month period.
                Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm of standard medical care or to an intervention arm in which a physician and pharmacist worked together as a team.
                At study completion, the percentage of patients achieving national goals due to intervention was more than double the percentage in the control arm (55% vs 20%, p < .001). Systolic blood pressure declined 23 mm Hg in the intervention arm versus 11 mm Hg in the control arm (p < .01). Diastolic blood pressure declined 14 and 3 mm Hg in the intervention and control arms, respectively (p < .001). The intervention worked equally as well in men and women and demonstrated noticeable promise in a minority of mixed-ancestry Hawaiians in whom hypertension is of special concern.
                Patients who fail to achieve national blood pressure goals under standard outpatient medical care may benefit from a program that includes a physician and pharmacist teamwork approach. Pharmaceutical care programs may be an option to improve blood pressure (BP) control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of pharmaceutical care programs in treating patients with resistant hypertension.
                In a double-blind randomized clinical trial, 71 patients with uncontrolled BP were enrolled in a pharmaceutical care program or in a control group and underwent a series of cognitive tests. The primary outcome was change in ambulatory BP (ABP) between the baseline evaluation and the final visit 6 months later. The secondary outcomes were the frequency of drug-related problems and adherence as determined by plasma levels of hydrochlorothiazide.
                The delta-values between the intervention and control groups for ABP in the different daily periods, with the corresponding 95% confidence limits, adjusted for age and baseline BP were: 3 (-1 to 5), 2 (-2 to 4), and 5 (-1 to 6) mm Hg for 24 h, daily and nightly systolic BP, respectively. The corresponding values for diastolic BP were 1 (-1 to 3), 0 (-2 to 2), and 3 (-1 to 4) mm Hg, respectively. Hydrochlorothiazide was detected in the plasma in 21 of 27 patients in the intervention group that attended to all appointments and 24 of 30 patients in the control group (P = .904).
                The pharmaceutical care program tested in this trial was feasible and showed a trend for better BP control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Standard office-based approaches to controlling hypertension show limited success. Such suboptimal hypertension control reflects in part the absence of both an infrastructure for patient education and frequent, regular blood pressure (BP) monitoring. We tested the efficacy of a physician-directed, nurse-managed, home-based system for hypertension management with standardized algorithms to modulate drug therapy, based on patients' reports of home BP.
                We randomized outpatients requiring drug therapy for hypertension according to the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) criteria to receive usual medical care only (UC, n = 76) or usual care plus nurse care management intervention (INT, n = 74) over a 6-month period.
                Patients receiving INT achieved greater reductions in office BP values at 6 months than those receiving UC: 14.2 +/- 18.1 versus 5.7 +/- 18.7 mm Hg systolic (P < .01) and 6.5 +/- 10.0 versus 3.4 +/- 7.9 mm Hg diastolic, respectively (P < .05). At 6 months, we observed one or more changes in drug therapy in 97% of INT patients versus 43% of UC patients, and 70% of INT patients received two or more drugs versus 46% of UC. Average daily adherence to medication, measured by electronic drug event monitors, was superior among INT subjects (mean +/- SD, 80.5% +/- 23.0%) than among UC subjects (69.2 +/- 31.1%; t(113) = 2.199, P = .03). There were no significant adverse drug reactions in either group.
                Telephone-mediated nurse management can successfully address many of the systems-related and patient-related issues that limit pharmacotherapeutic effectiveness for hypertension. The effects of self-monitoring of blood pressure on the control of hypertension were examined in this study. Failure of patients to comply with treatment is presumably attributable in part to the fact that hypertension usually is asymptomatic until complications develop. Self-monitoring might make visible an otherwise asymptomatic condition, and thereby increase motivation. One hundred hypertensive patients beginning outpatient treatment were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Subjects were given a sphygmomanometer and instructed in its use. Both groups were given similar antihypertensive medications. After six months of treatment, mean systolic pressure was significantly lower (11.4 mm Hg, p smaller than 0.05) in the experimental than in the control subjects. However, the mean baseline systolic pressure in the control group was 3.9 mm Hg less than that of the experimental group. If this value is substracted from the difference between the last mean systolic pressures in the two groups, the 7.5 mm Hg difference is seen as a very modest effect of self-monitoring. Diastolic blood pressure was insignificantly lower for experimental subjects. Compared to the potent effectiveness of drugs in reducing blood pressure, self-monitoring was of little value. Two interventions designed to help physicians manage hypertensive patients were evaluated in a controlled trial: 1) computer-generated feedback to facilitate identification of poorly controlled patients; and 2) a physician education program on clinical management strategies, emphasizing patient compliance. Four physician practice teams received either computer feedback, the education program, both, or neither. Feedback team physicians received seven monthly listings of the latest visits and blood pressures of their hypertensive patients. The self-administered learning program included written clinical stimulations and associated didactic material. Experimental and control physicians were similar in baseline knowledge, patient mix and level of training. All feedback team physicians requested appointments for listed patients, and their patients made twice as many visits as control patients during the intervention period (p less than 0.05). Education team physicians showed significant gains on a content-specific post-intervention test: mean score 84 per cent compared with 74 per cent for the control group (p less than 0.005). All patient groups showed improvement in blood pressure over the study period. However, no differences between intervention teams could be detected (p greater than 0.20). The probability of missing a 10 mm interteam difference in outcome diastolic pressure was 1 per cent (power of 0.99). Strategies for further improvement in outpatient hypertension management may need to come from outside the traditional medical model. This study was planned in the context of a regional high blood pressure programme, to compare the efficacy of two educative methods. The group of 722 hypertensive patients (58.8% women), mean age 61 years, was randomly selected from 19 primary care centres. Initial assessment was based on a patient interview including 22 questions on high blood pressure, its consequences and treatment. Patients agreeing to participate in an active education team programme were distributed into three groups: individual education, team education and a control group. Those who declined to participate formed two groups: individual education and controls. Team education consisted of two audiovisual sessions attended by groups of 8-12 patients and conducted by treating physicians and nurses. Individual education included comments related to the 22 questions. Follow-up assessment was made after two months. An increase in the level of hypertension control was observed only in the accepting group, in which educative action was followed by increased knowledge. Results were similarly favourable for both the individual and team education groups and suggested the need to consider educational factors together with those influencing patient attitude towards an active educational programme. To evaluate the incremental effectiveness of a work-site blood pressure control program, we conducted a randomized, controlled trial at four work sites with established health promotion programs. Workers with blood pressures of 140/90 mm Hg or higher were eligible. Eighty subjects were assigned to receive a referral to a community physician, monthly 10-minute work-site counseling sessions including blood pressure readings, and personalized mailings, whereas 79 control subjects received only a physician referral. Results for 74 intervention and 71 control subjects were obtained after 1 year. As compared with control subjects, intervention subjects experienced average declines of 8.5/3.9 mm Hg. Adjusted for age, sex, and baseline blood pressure, the decreases were 7.6 mm Hg for systolic and 2.4 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure. These results suggest that counseling of high-risk persons and personalized mailing programs can have an incremental benefit in controlling blood pressure. Hypertension is generally poorly controlled in primary care. One possible intervention for improving control is the harnessing of patient expertise through education and encouragement to challenge their care.
                To determine whether encouraging patients to manage their hypertension in an 'expert' manner, by providing them with information in a clear clinical guideline, coupled with an explicit exhortation to become involved in and to challenge their own care if appropriate, would improve their care.
                Single blind randomised controlled trial of detailed guideline versus standard information.
                Single urban general practice over 1 year.
                Patient-held guideline with written explicit exhortation to challenge care when appropriate. Two hundred and ninety-four of 536 eligible patients on the practice hypertension register were recruited, all of whom were randomised into one of two groups. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the study.
                Primary outcome: average systolic blood pressure. Secondary outcomes: proportion of patients with blood pressure < 150 mmHg systolic and < 90 mmHg diastolic, average cholesterol, proportion of patients prescribed statins and aspirin according to guideline, hospital anxiety and depression score. No clinically, or statistically significant differences were found between intervention and control with respect to all parameters or in anxiety and depression levels. Statin and aspirin use improved throughout the course of the study in both groups. Statin use showed a trend (P = 0.02) in favour of control.
                In this study there was no clinically significant perceived benefit to patients as a result of providing them with a hypertension guideline. Patient guidelines are currently planned for many chronic illnesses. It is important to determine the utility of such interventions before scarce resources are applied to them. The efficacy of self-recording of blood pressure in the management of hypertension was assessed in a randomized clinical trial involving 140 persons who had been receiving antihypertensive therapy for a year or more, but whose diastolic blood pressure had remained at 95 mm Hg or higher. To control for the increased attention implicit in self-recording, which might affect blood pressure, the patients were assigned at random to one of the four groups: self-recording and monthly home visits, self-recording only, monthly home visits only, and neither self-recording nor monthly home visits. This design also permitted assessment of the effect of home visits. During the 6-month experiment no significant differences were apparent between the groups in either compliance or diastolic blood pressure. However, both self-recording and monthly home visits produced a reduction in blood pressure among patients who admitted to difficulty remembering to take their pills; a reduction was not seen among patients who said they had no such difficulty. This confirmed an earlier observation suggesting that this easily identified group of patients may be the most responsive to intervention programs. The objective of this study was to determine whether a hypertension management program in which patients monitor their own blood pressure (BP) at home can reduce costs without compromising BP control. The prospective, randomized, controlled 1-year clinical trial was conducted at four medical centers of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in the San Francisco Bay Area. Of 467 patients with uncomplicated hypertension who were referred by their physicians, 37 declined to participate in the study; 215 were randomly assigned to a Usual Care (UC) group and 215 to a Home BP group. Twenty-five UC patients and 15 Home BP patients did not return for year-end BP measurements. Patients in the UC group were referred back to their physicians. Patients in the Home BP group were trained to measure their own BP and return the readings by mail. Patients were given a standard procedure to follow in case of unusually high or low BP readings at home. The number and type of outpatient medical services used were obtained from patient medical records for the study year and the prior year. Costs of care for hypertension were calculated by assigning relative value units to each outpatient service. Trained technicians measured each patient's BP at entry into the study and 1 year later. Home BP patients made 1.2 fewer hypertension-related office visits than UC patients during the study year (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8, 1.7). Mean adjusted cost for physician visits, telephone calls, and laboratory tests associated with hypertension care was $88.76 per patient per year in the Home BP group, 29% less than in the UC group (95% CI: $16.11, $54.74). The annualized cost of implementing the home BP system was approximately $28 per patient during the study year and would currently be approximately $15. After 1 year, BP control in men in the Home BP group was better than in men in the UC group; BP control was equally good in women in both groups. Management of uncomplicated hypertension based on periodic home BP reports can achieve BP control with fewer physician visits, resulting in substantial cost savings. To assess whether an organised programme of prevention including the use of a health promotion nurse noticeably improved recording and follow up of cardiovascular risk factors and cervical smears in a general practice that had access to computerised cell and recall.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                General practice in inner London.
                All 3206 men and women aged 30-64 registered with the practice.
                The intervention group had their risk factors ascertained and followed up by the health promotion nurse and the general practitioner, whereas those in the control group were managed by the general practitioner alone.
                Recording and follow up of blood pressure and cervical smears after three years. Recording of smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease, and serum cholesterol concentrations were also examined. MEASUREMENTS and
                When the trial was stopped after two years the measurements of blood pressure in the preceding five years were 93% (1511/1620) v 73% (1160/1586) (95% confidence interval for difference 17.5 to 22.7%) for intervention and control groups respectively. For patients with hypertension the figures were 97% (104/107) v 69% (80/116) (18.2 to 38.2%). For women the proportion who had had a cervical smear in the preceding three years were 76% (606/799) v 49% (392/806) (22.5 to 31.9%). Recording of smoking, family history of ischaemic heart disease, and serum cholesterol concentrations was also higher in the intervention group compared with the control group.
                An organised programme, which includes a nurse with specific responsibility for adult prevention, is likely to make an important contribution to recording of risk factors and follow up of those patients with known risks. This prospective, randomized, controlled study evaluated the impact of pharmacist-initiated home blood pressure monitoring and intervention on blood pressure control, therapy compliance, and quality of life (QOL). Subjects were 36 patients with uncontrolled stage 1 or 2 hypertension. Eighteen subjects received home blood pressure monitors, a diary, and instructions to measure blood pressure twice every morning. Home measurements were evaluated by a clinical pharmacist by telephone, and the patient's family physician was contacted with recommendations if mean monthly values were 140/90 mm Hg or higher. Eighteen control patients did not receive home monitors or pharmacist intervention. Office blood pressure measurements and QOL surveys (SF-36) were obtained at baseline and after 6 months. Mean absolute reductions in systolic and diastolic pressures were significantly reduced from baseline in intervention subjects (17.0 and 10.5 mm Hg, both p < 0.0001) but not in controls (7.0 and 3.8 mm Hg, p = 0.12 and p = 0.09). More intervention subjects (8) had blood pressure values below 140/90 at 6 months compared with controls (4). During the study 83.3% (15) of intervention subjects had drug therapy changes versus 33% (6) of controls (p < 0.01). Compliance and QOL were not significantly affected. Our data suggest that the combination of pharmacist intervention with home monitoring can improve blood pressure control in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. This may be related to increased modifications of drug regimens. A clinical trial of 204 untreated patients with mild hypertension was conducted to assess the effect of home blood pressure monitoring on blood pressure level, pharmacologic treatment, reduction of risk factors, and use of health services. After 1 year, no statistically significant differences were found between the treatment and control groups. The findings indicate that, while home blood pressure monitoring may be useful, it has no measurable short-term impact on these aspects of blood pressure management for patients with mild hypertension. Evaluation of a structured hypertension treatment and teaching programme in general practice.
                Prospective controlled trial; follow-up period 18 months.
                10 primary health care practices. PRACTICES AND PATIENTS: From each practice 20 patients (30 to 60 years old, mean of the last two blood pressure measurements at or above 160 and/or 95 mmHg) were randomly selected; in 5 practices these patients were to participate in the treatment and teaching programme; in the remaining 5 practices hypertension care was continued without the availability of such a programme (controls).
                Structured treatment and teaching programme based upon four group sessions for patients mainly conducted by paramedical personnel.
                Blood pressure, body weight, prescription of antihypertensive drugs - as documented in the patient's records.
                Of the 100 control patients 26 and of the 100 intervention patients 14 were lost to observation; 46 patients had agreed to participate in the programme. The mean number of prescribed antihypertensive agents per patient decreased in the intervention group (1.8 +/- 1.3 at baseline, vs 1.2 +/- 1.2 at follow-up) compared to the control group (1.6 +/- 1.3 vs 1.8 +/- 1.6); difference 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.1), p < 0.0001. In the control group 9% and in the intervention group 33% of patients had documented reductions of body weight (p < 0.0001). Blood pressure decreased in the intervention group (162 +/- 14/100 +/- 7 mmHg at baseline, vs 154 +/- 16/95 +/- 9 mmHg at follow-up) compared to the control group (161 +/- 13/98 +/- 7 mmHg vs 158 +/- 18/96 +/- 11 mmHg); differences for systolic blood pressure 5 (95% CI 0 to 10) mmHg, p = 0.071; for diastolic blood pressure 4 (1 to 7) mmHg, p = 0.018.
                The introduction of a structured hypertension treatment and teaching programme in general practice may lead to significant improvements of hypertension care. 38 hypertensive Canadian steelworkers who were neither compliant with medications nor at goal diastolic blood-pressure six months after starting treatment were allocated either to a control group or to an experimental group who were taught how to measure their own blood-pressures, asked to chart their home blood-pressures and pill taking, and taught how to tailor pill taking to their daily habits and rituals; these men were also seen fortnightly by a highschool graduate with no formal health professional training who reinforced the experimental manoeuvres and rewarded improvements in compliance and blood-pressure. Six months later, average compliance had fallen by 1.5% in the control group but rose 21.3% in the experimental group. Blood-pressures fell in 17 of 20 experimental patients (to goal in 6) and in 10 of 18 control patients (to goal in 2). To measure the effectiveness of a multifaceted educational intervention to improve ambulatory hypertension control.
                Cluster-randomized trial.
                Academic health system using an ambulatory electronic medical record.
                A total of 10,696 patients with a diagnosis of hypertension cared for by 93 primary care providers.
                Academic detailing, provision of provider-specific data about hypertension control, provision of educational materials to the provider, and provision of educational and motivational materials to patients.
                The primary outcome was blood pressure control, defined as a blood pressure measurement below 140/90 mm Hg, and was ascertained from electronic medical records over 6 months of follow-up. We determined the adjusted odds ratio for the association between the intervention and the achievement of controlled blood pressure. When we accounted for clustering by provider, this adjusted odds ratio was 1.13 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.47). Adjusted odds ratios were 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.36) in patients whose blood pressure was controlled at baseline and 1.25 (95% confidence interval 0.94-1.65) in those whose blood pressure was not. These odds ratios were not significantly different (p=0.11).
                These results were consistent with no effect or, at best, a relatively modest effect of the intervention among patients with hypertension. Had we not included a concurrent control group, the data would have provided an unduly optimistic view of the effectiveness of the program. The effectiveness of future interventions may be improved by focusing on patients whose blood pressure is uncontrolled at baseline. Lack of medication adherence is a common reason for poor control of blood pressure in the community, increasing the risk of heart attacks and strokes.
                To evaluate the effect of nurse-led adherence support for people with uncontrolled high blood pressure compared with usual care.
                We recruited 245 women and men with uncontrolled hypertension (> or = 150/90 mmHg) from 21 general practices in Bristol, UK. Participants were randomized to receive nurse-led adherence support or usual care alone. Main outcome measures were adherence to medication ('timing compliance') and blood pressure.
                Mean baseline timing compliance (+/- SD) was high in both the intervention (90.8 +/- 15.6%) and the control group (94.5 +/- 7.6%). There was no evidence of an effect of the intervention on timing compliance at follow-up (adjusted difference in means -1.0%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -5.1 to 3.1). There was also no difference at follow-up between the groups with regard to systolic blood pressure (-2.7 mmHg; 95% CI -7.2 to 1.8) or diastolic blood pressure (0.2 mmHg; 95% CI -1.9 to 2.3). Projected costs for the primary care sector per consultation were 6.60 pound sterling for the intervention compared with 5.08 pound sterling for usual care.
                In this study, adherence to blood pressure medication was much higher than previously reported. There was no evidence of an effect of nurse-led adherence support on medication adherence or blood pressure compared with usual care. Nurse-led adherence support was also more expensive from a primary care perspective. The practice of pharmaceutical care in primary care settings in Thailand is currently not generally accepted.
                To evaluate the effect of pharmacist involvement in treatment with hypertensive patients in primary care settings.
                The treatment objective was to stabilize the blood pressure (BP) of hypertensive patients in accordance with the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure guidelines. Patients were randomly assigned to a pharmacist-involved group (treatment) or a group with no pharmacist involvement (control). Pre- and post-test BPs, tablet counts, lifestyle modifications, and pharmacists' recommendations were recorded. The 6-month study was carried out in Mahasarakham University pharmacy and 2 primary care units. Patients were monitored monthly by reviewing their medications and supported by providing pharmaceutical care and counseling.
                From a total of 235 patients, the treatment group (n = 118) had a significant reduction in both systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP compared with the 117 patients of the control group (p = 0.037, 0.027, respectively). The 158 patients (76 treatment, 82 control) with BPs >or=140/90 mm Hg at the beginning of the study showed significant BP reductions (p = 0.002 SBP, 0.008 DBP). The proportion of 158 patients whose BP became stabilized was higher in the treatment group (p = 0.017). The treatment group showed significantly better adherence (p = 0.014) and exercise control (p = 0.012) at the end of the study. Physicians accepted 42.72% of medication modifications and 5.34% of the suggestions for additional investigations.
                Hypertensive patients who received pharmacist input achieved a significantly greater benefit in BP reduction, BP control, and improvement in adherence rate and lifestyle modification. Technological advances in the distribution of information have opened new avenues for patient care. Few trials, however, have used telemedicine to improve blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension.
                To determine the efficacy of a telecommunication service in reducing blood pressure.
                Randomized, controlled trial.
                University-affiliated primary care outpatient clinics.
                121 adults with essential hypertension who were under evaluation for a change in antihypertensive therapy.
                A home service consisting of automatic transmission of blood pressure data over telephone lines, computerized conversion of the information into report forms, and weekly electronic transmission of the report forms to physicians and patients.
                24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring at baseline and exit. The primary end point was change in mean arterial pressure from baseline to exit.
                Mean arterial pressure decreased by 2.8 mm Hg in patients receiving the home service and increased by 1.3 mm Hg in patients receiving usual care (P = 0.013 for the difference). Mean diastolic blood pressure decreased by 2.0 mm Hg for home service but increased by 2.1 mm Hg for usual care (P = 0.012 for the difference). Mean systolic blood pressure decreased by 4.9 mm Hg for home service and 0.1 mm Hg for patients receiving usual care (P = 0.047 for the difference). Among African-American patients, mean arterial pressure decreased by 9.6 mm Hg in those receiving home service and increased by 5.25 mm Hg in those receiving usual care (P = 0.047). Part of the decrease in blood pressure for home service was due to more frequent changes in the type or dose of antihypertensive medications.
                This telecommunication service was efficacious in reducing the mean arterial pressure of patients with established essential hypertension. 230 Canadian steelworkers with hypertension took part in a randomised trial to see if compliance with antihypertensive drug regimens could be improved. For care and follow-up these men were randomly allocated to see either their own family doctors outside working-hours or industrial physicians during work shifts; the same men were randomly allocated to receive or not receive an educational programme aimed at instructing them about hypertension and its treatment. Surprisingly, the convenience of follow-up at work had no effect upon these men's compliance with antihypertensive drug regimens. Similarly, although men receiving health education learned a lot about hypertension, they were not more likely to take their medicine. nan This study assessed the effectiveness of enhanced tracking and follow-up services provided by community health workers in promoting medical follow-up of persons whose elevated blood pressures were detected during blood pressure measurement at urban community sites.
                In a randomized controlled trial, 421 participants received either enhanced or usual referrals to care. Participants were 18 years or older, were either Black or White, and had blood pressure greater than or equal to 140/90 mm Hg and income equal to or less than 200% of poverty. The primary outcome measure was completion of a medical follow-up visit within 90 days of referral.
                The enhanced intervention increased follow-up by 39.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 14%, 71%; P = .001) relative to usual care. Follow-up visits were completed by 65.1% of participants in the intervention group, compared with 46.7% of those in the usual-care group. The number needed to treat was 5 clients (95% CI = 3, 13) per additional follow-up visit realized.
                Enhanced tracking and outreach increased the proportion of persons with elevated blood pressure detected during community measurement who followed up with medical care. This exploratory study examined the effect of structured teaching about essential hypertension on control of the diastolic blood pressure in individuals with a diagnosis of essential hypertension. Using the pre-test, post-test design, study participants were measured on knowledge about essential hypertension and diastolic blood pressure before and after intervention. Six hypotheses were tested, three related to control of blood pressure, and three related to knowledge about essential hypertension. There was no significant difference between the experimental and control groups on diastolic blood pressure readings at the conclusion of the study. There was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups on post-test scores on knowledge of essential hypertension. It was concluded that structured teaching had no significant effect upon control of the diastolic blood pressure. Instruction increased knowledge, but not blood pressure control. nan Hypertension should be aggressively treated, especially in diabetic patients. But studies of physician prescribing habits reveal that physicians often delay making medication changes or initiating antihypertensive therapy. A chart-based reminder was designed to improve physician medication prescribing in this clinical situation.
                A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center in Richmond, Virginia. Patients with diabetes and hypertension were selected. A highly visible chart reminder was applied to the front of outpatient charts in the intervention group practice. A chart review was conducted to assess physician-directed medication changes. A successful outcome was defined as any antihypertensive medication increase or addition at that same visit.
                Physicians were more likely to intensify antihypertensive medication as the blood pressure increased regardless of the reminder. Overall, only 33% of visits resulted in a medication change, even though 93% of patients had elevations over target blood pressure at the follow-up visit. Physicians in the intervention and control groups made changes to medication at similar rates (chi 2 = 0.621, p = .511).
                In this study, a chart reminder failed to improve physician compliance with the clinical guideline for hypertension management in diabetics, Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on the Detection, Evaluation, Prevention and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. To inform the design of effective intervention strategies, further research should explore specific barriers to guideline adherence in this clinical situation. A single-blinded, randomized trial was conducted to determine whether a mailed postcard improved follow-up in uncontrolled hypertensives. One hundred and seven patients with a systolic blood pressure (BP) of 180 or more or a diastolic blood pressure of 110 or more at an inner-city, hospital-based walk-in clinic were enrolled; mean age was 56 years, 95 percent were African American, 73 percent were female, and mean BP was 193/106. Patients were required to be aware of their diagnosis and to have been informed of their need for medication at least a month before the trial. Of those who received postcard reminders, 45 percent followed up within 10 days, compared with 47 percent of controls (p = 0.93). At 30 days, 64 percent of the intervention group followed up, compared with 55 percent of controls (p = 0.36). In an adjusted logistic regression model, there was no difference in follow-up. Correlates of appointment noncompliance at one month included alcoholism and lack of insurance in an adjusted logistic regression model. Follow-up in severe hypertensives was poor, and a mailed postcard reminder had no effect in a walk-in setting. nan A controlled, randomized study was conducted in two chain pharmacies to determine the clinical value of comprehensive pharmacy services for hypertensive patients in a chain pharmacy setting. Twenty-seven patients were enrolled as intervention participants with 26 control subjects. Monthly services for the intervention group included blood pressure and heart rate assessments and counseling on lifestyle modifications and drug therapy. Control patients received initial and final blood pressure measurements and minimal counseling. Both study and control groups completed quality-of-life questionnaires upon entering and completing the study. Results showed that blood pressure control was significantly improved in the study group. Compliance rates as well as energy/fatigue scores (a quality-of-life scale) improved in the study group compared with the control population. Community pharmacists in chain stores could have a beneficial effect on the health care of large numbers of patients if pharmaceutical care programs were developed. Blood pressure self-measurement is increasing in most communities and yet its role in the management of hypertension is poorly understood. This study was devised to evaluate the behaviour of doctors in general practice when treating patients with poorly controlled essential hypertension who use self-measurement. Patients, most of whom were already taking antihypertensive medications were commenced on perindopril or indapamide at their doctor's discretion and were randomly allocated to self-measurement (SM) using an OMRON HEM706 oscillometric device or a continuation of their usual care (UC) over an 8-week period. This was an observational study without any specific or set treatment goals for the doctor to follow. Sixty of 62 subjects completed the study and the two groups were equally matched for age, body mass index, gender, and blood pressure (BP). While additional perindopril or indapamide produced a significant fall in BP in both groups over the study period, the systolic pressure remained significantly higher in the SM group (sitting 148 +/- 3 compared with 142 +/- 3; 145 +/- 3 compared with 138 +/- 3 mm Hg respectively; P < 0.05). Twenty-four hour and daytime ambulatory monitor systolic pressures were also significantly higher in the SM group. Differences in diastolic BP were not statistically significant. Furthermore, SM patients were less likely to have their medications increased and more likely to have them reduced or ceased. Doctors and patients found self-measurement convenient and useful. This study suggests that doctors prescribing decisions are influenced by evidence from self-measurement of BP with consequential increases in office BP related to reduced drug use. While self-BP measurement can offer reassurance about adequacy of control when away from a physicians office, our best evidence of understanding target blood pressures comes from large randomised studies using office blood pressures as an end-point. There is an urgent need for further study to provide arbitration between self-measurement and office blood pressures although each measurement must contribute to the management of hypertension. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program (HDFP), in a community-based, randomized controlled trial involving 10,940 persons with high blood pressure (BP), compared the effects on five-year mortality of a systematic antihypertensive treatment program (Stepped Care [SC]) and referral to community medical therapy (Referred Care [RC]). Participants, recruited by population-based screening of 158,906 people aged 30 to 69 years in 14 communities througout the United States, were randomly assigned to SC or RC groups within each center and by entry diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (90 to 104, 105 to 114, and 115 + mm Hg). Over the five years of the study, more than two thirds of the SC participants continued to receive medication, and more than 50% achieved BP levels within the normotensive range, at or below the HDFP goal for DBP. Controls of BP was consistently better for the SC than for the RC group. Five-year mortality from all causes was 17% lower for the SC group compared to the RC group (6.4 vs 7.7 per 100, P less than .01) and 20% lower for the SC subgroup with entry DBP of 90 to 104 mm Hg compared to the corresponding RC subgroup (5.9 vs 7.4 per 100, P less than .01). These findings of the HDFP indicate that the systematic effective management of hypertension has a great potential for reducing mortality for the large numbers of people with high BP in the population, including those with "mild" hypertension. A radomized controlled trial was conducted in a metropolitan teaching hospital to determine whether improving follow-up of emergency room patients who had hypertension led to improvements in their medical care and blood pressure control. One hundred fourty four patients were randomly assigned into an intervention group and a control group. In the former, a follow-up clerk assigned patients in returning for follow-up care. Eighty-four percent of patients in this group and 63% of control patients returned to the clinic (P less than 0.1). However, five months after the patients' emergency room visits, 51% of patients in the intervention group and 53% of control patients were normotensive. There were more diagnostic and therapeutic measures in the intervention group, but long-term management was similar in both groups. Improvement in follow-up may not be by itself lead to blood pressure control among hypertensive patients. Hypertension is one of the most common diseases seen by the practicing physician. Yet, because of noncompliance, conditions of many hypertensive patients are not effectively controlled by treatment. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of a patient education program in reducing the blood pressure (BP) of hypertensive patients in a private, solo medical practice. The intervention program focused on three behavioral objectives-pill taking, appointment keeping, and dietary sodium reduction while stressing the need for taking responsibility for one's own care. It was hypothesized that patients receiving an educational intervention stressing self-care would benefit more than those receiving the usual medical care. A substantial reduction in BP was considered to be the measure of successful treatment. Thirty-nine hypertensive patients receiving drug therapy from a private, solo medical practice were randomized into either a treatment group or a control group. A comparison of means disclosed no pretreatment differences between the groups' average BPs. After following up both groups for six months, mean changes in BP were compared for both treatment and control patients using a two-sample t test for independent samples. The BP fell in the treatment group (-13 mm Hg, systolic; -8 mm Hg, diastolic) but rose slightly in the control group (3 mm Hg, systolic 0.5 mm Hg, diastolic). The difference in changes was significant for both the systolic and diastolic BP. First Nations people with diabetes mellitus and hypertension are at greater risk of renal and cardiovascular complications than are non-native patients because of barriers to health care services. We conducted this randomized controlled trial to assess whether a community-based treatment strategy implemented by home care nurses would be effective in controlling hypertension in First Nations people with existing hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
                We compared 2 community-based strategies for controlling hypertension in First Nations people with existing hypertension and diabetes. In the intervention group, a home care nurse followed a predefined treatment algorithm of pharmacologic antihypertensive therapy. In the control group, treatment decisions were made by each subject's primary care physician. The primary outcome measure was the difference between the 2 groups in the change in systolic blood pressure after 12 months. Secondary outcome measures were the change in diastolic blood pressure over time, the change in urine albumin status and the incidence of adverse events.
                Both groups experienced a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure by the final visit (by 24.0 [standard deviation (SD) 13.5] mm Hg in the intervention group and by 17.0 [SD 18.6] mm Hg in the control group); p < 0.001 in each case). However, the difference between the 2 groups in this change was not significant. Patients in the intervention group had a larger decrease in diastolic blood pressure over time than did those in the control group (by 11.6 [SD 10.6] mm Hg v. 6.8 [SD 11.1] mm Hg respectively; p = 0.05). The groups did not differ significantly in terms of changes in urine albumin excretion or incidence of adverse events.
                High rates of blood pressure control in the community were achieved in both groups in the DREAM 3 study. The addition of a home care nurse to implement a treatment strategy for blood pressure control was more effective in lowering diastolic than systolic blood pressure compared with home care visits for blood pressure monitoring alone and follow-up treatment by a family physician. nan The population aged 40 to 64 years of the municipality of Köyliö, situated in southwestern Finland, was screened for hypertension in 1973-74; a total of 1018 persons (92%) participated in the program. On the basis of two separate blood pressure measurements a total of 147 hypertensive individuals who were not under treatment were identified. These individuals were divided into two groups by randomization of matched pairs. One group (the control group) was merely advised by letter to see a physician for raised blood pressure, while the other group (the experimental group), in addition to being so notified, received written information explaining the nature of hypertension and the importance of its treatment. After two years, the individuals in both groups were invited for a follow-up blood-pressure measurement, with the object of investigating the number of individuals who had sought treatment and who had continued it, and the differences between the groups in treatment seeking and adherence. A total of 79% of those who were notified to seek medical care had done so. Antihypertensive drug therapy had been begun for 85% of these. After two years, 56% of those who had been found initially to be hypertensive and who were seen in the follow-up were still under treatment. In 43% of these the blood pressure was at the target level. No statistically significant differences in treatment seeking and adherence to it were found between the experimental and control groups, nor were differences found in the decline in the blood pressure or its target levels. Comparing with other studies shows, that results can be better if the health care system that carries out the screening procedure for hypertension also take active steps to bring the patient under treatment and keep him on the regimen. Hypertension often clusters with metabolic risk factors and its optimal treatment may involve a number of changes in lifestyle. Nurse-led care regarding lifestyle change may improve outcomes in cardiovascular disease prevention involving.
                To examine if lifestyle guidance given by a nurse improved components of the metabolic syndrome including blood pressure, lipids and waist circumference.
                Subjects that participated in a health screening with systolic blood pressure 140-169 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mm Hg at a minimum of three separate readings treated or not treated with antihypertensive drugs were randomly allocated either to monthly nurse-led lifestyle counselling (intervention group, N=31) or to conventional primary care (control group, N=20) to be followed by lifestyle counselling.
                The mean (S.D.) baseline and end of study blood pressure was 157 (9)/94 (6) mm Hg and 147 (9)/91 (8) mm Hg, respectively, in the intervention group versus 153 (9)/94 (4) and 143 (10)/92 (8) mm Hg, respectively, in the control group (NS between the groups). Waist circumference increased significantly between baseline and 6 months in the control but not in the intervention (mean difference between the groups, 3.1 cm [95% CI 1.2-5.0], p=0.04) and serum triglyceride concentrations were reduced in the intervention compared with the control group (mean difference, 0.56 mmol/l [95% CI 0.22-0.90], p=0.03). The number of risk factors of the metabolic syndrome was 2.1 (S.D. 1.1) at baseline and 2.6 (S.D. 1.2) at 6 months in the control group versus 2.2 (S.D. 1.1) and 1.9 (S.D. 1.0), respectively, in the intervention group (p=0.01). Change in triglycerides was correlated with change in weight (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.73, p=0.001) and waist circumference (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.63, p=0.009) in the control group.
                Nurse counselling did not reduce blood pressure but was associated with a lesser gain in waist circumference and reduced triglyceride concentrations. Metabolic risk factors may worsen rapidly in patients with mild hypertension in the waiting period for lifestyle intervention. In the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program, 7825 (71.5 per cent) of the 10,940 participants had diastolic blood pressures averaging between 90 and 104 mm Hg on entry into the study and were designated Stratum 1. Half were referred to their usual source of care in the community (the referred-care group), and half were treated intensively in special clinics (the stepped-care group). Five-year mortality in the Stratum 1 patients given stepped care was 20.3 per cent lower than in those given referred care (P less than 0.01). Particularly noteworthy was the beneficial effect of stepped-care treatment on persons with diastolic pressures of 90 to 104 mm Hg who had no evidence of end-organ damage and were not receiving antihypertensive medication when they entered the study. This subgroup had 28.6 per cent fewer deaths at five years among those treated with stepped care than among those treated with referred care (P less than 0.01). These findings support a recommendation that in patients with mild hypertension, treatment should be considered early, before damage to end organs occurs. The majority of hypertensive patients do not reach the target blood pressure (BP). We sought to clarify whether intermittent self-monitoring of BP leads to better BP control compared to ordinary treatment in general practice.
                Two hundred sixty-nine hypertensive patients participated in this multicenter, randomized, parallel-group study in primary health care. Home BP was measured in the self-monitoring (SM) group at 0, 2, 4, and 6 months, and in the control (C) group at 0 and 6 months. The participating physicians were instructed to intensify the antihypertensive therapy when needed.
                At the beginning, both groups had similar home BP levels (SM 143.1 +/- 17.4/85.3 +/- 7.4 mm Hg v C 143.9 +/- 18.3/85.4 +/- 7.5 mm Hg). After 6 months, there were significant decreases in systolic (P <or= .0001), diastolic (P <or= .0029), and pulse pressures (P <or= .021) in both groups. Systolic (-7.8 +/- 13.1 mm Hg v -4.5 +/- 12.2 mm Hg, P = .047) and pulse pressure (-4.7 +/- 9.0 mm Hg v -2.2 +/- 10.0 mm Hg, P = .042) decreased significantly more than in the self-monitoring group. The decrease in diastolic pressure was similar in both groups (SM -3.1 +/- 6.2 mm Hg v C -2.3 +/- 8.3 mm Hg, P = not significant). The patients in the SM group reached home BP target more often than those in the C group (29% v 16%, P = .016). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower office BP values in the SM group.
                Self-monitoring decreased systolic and pulse pressure significantly more than ordinary treatment and promoted achievement of target BP. This was most likely due to improved patient compliance and more active treatment by the physicians. Our results suggest that home measurement is useful in the control of hypertension. Research is needed to validate effective and practical strategies for improving the provision of evidence-based medicine in primary care.
                To determine whether a multimethod quality improvement intervention was more effective than a less intensive intervention for improving adherence to 21 quality indicators for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease and stroke.
                2-year randomized, controlled clinical trial with the practice as the unit of randomization.
                20 community-based family or general internal medicine practices in 14 states. All used the same electronic medical record.
                44 physicians, 17 midlevel providers, and approximately 200 staff members; data from the electronic medical records of 87,291 patients.
                All practices received copies of practice guidelines and quarterly performance reports. Intervention practices also hosted quarterly site visits to help them adopt quality improvement approaches and participated in 2 network meetings to share "best practice" approaches.
                The percentage of indicators at or above predefined targets and the percentage of patients who had achieved each clinical indicator.
                Intervention practices improved 22.4 percentage points (from 11.3% to 33.7%) in the percentage of indicators at or above the target; control practices improved 16.4 percentage points (from 6.3% to 22.7%). The 6.0-percentage point absolute difference between the intervention and control group was not statistically significant (P > 0.2). Patients in intervention practices had greater improvements than those in control practices for diagnoses of hypertension (improvement difference, 15.7 percentage points [95% CI, 5.2 to 26.3 percentage points]) and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension (improvement difference, 8.0 percentage points [CI, 0.0 to 16.0 percentage points]).
                The study involved a small number of practices and lacked a pure control group.
                Primary care practices that use electronic medical records and receive regular performance reports can improve their adherence to clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular disease and stroke prevention. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of automated telephone patient monitoring and counseling on patient adherence to antihypertensive medications and on blood pressure control. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 29 greater Boston communities. The study subjects were 267 patients recruited from community sites who were >or= 60 years of age, on antihypertensive medication, with a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of >or= 160 mm Hg and/or a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of >or= 90 mm Hg. The study compared subjects who received usual medical care with those who used a computer-controlled telephone system in addition to their usual medical care during a period of 6 months. Weekly, subjects in the telephone group reported self-measured blood pressures, knowledge and adherence to antihypertensive medication regimens, and medication side-effects. This information was sent to their physicians regularly. The main study outcome measures were change in antihypertensive medication adherence, SBP and DBP during 6 months, satisfaction of patient users, perceived utility for physicians, and cost-effectiveness. The mean age of the study population was 76.0 years; 77% were women; 11% were black. Mean antihypertensive medication adherence improved 17.7% for telephone system users and 11.7% for controls (P = .03). Mean DBP decreased 5.2 mm Hg in users compared to 0.8 mm Hg in controls (P = .02). Among nonadherent subjects, mean DBP decreased 6.0 mm Hg for telephone users, but increased 2.8 mm Hg for controls (P = .01). For telephone system users, mean DBP decreased more if their medication adherence improved (P = .03). The majority of telephone system users were satisfied with the system. Most physicians integrated it into their practices. The system was cost-effective, especially for nonadherent patient users. Therefore, weekly use of an automated telephone system improved medication adherence and blood pressure control in hypertension patients. This system can be used to monitor patients with hypertension or with other chronic diseases, and is likely to improve health outcomes and reduce health services utilization and costs. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of a patient-directed management strategy with office-based management in maintaining blood pressure control in patients with chronic stable hypertension using a randomized trial of two months duration. The subjects had chronic stable essential hypertension without secondary causes or unstable cardiovascular disease and were selected through the offices of 11 family physicians and a tertiary care hypertension research unit. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1 ratio) to either a patient-directed management strategy using home blood pressure monitoring to adjust drug therapy if readings consistently exceeded defined limits, or office-based management through physician visits. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean arterial pressure as determined by automatic ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Secondary endpoints were changes in compliance, quality of life, and health care resource use. Ninety-one potential subjects were screened and 31 were randomized. Subjects in the patient-directed management group employed the drug adjustment protocols appropriately without complications. A significant difference in change in mean blood pressure was observed, favoring the patient-directed management (-0.95 mm Hg and +1.90 mm Hg, respectively, for patient-directed management and office-based management, P = .039). Compliance rates and quality of life scores were not significantly different between groups. Physician visits were more frequent in the patient-directed management group (1.05 v 0.20 visits/8 weeks, respectively, for patient-directed management and office-based management groups, P = .045). A patient-directed hypertensive management strategy may be feasible for patients with chronic stable hypertension. Such a strategy may improve blood pressure control compared with usual office-based care. However, physician visits may be increased using this strategy, at least in the short term. The value of patient education programmes in the control of hypertension is controversial. We have conducted a prospective study to investigate a patient education programme in our clinic. Every new patient was randomised into one of two different groups: a control group (CG, n = 149) and an intervention group (IG, n = 138); the latter group was invited to attend two educational talks and subsequently one tutorial meeting. Blood pressure, heart rate, Quetelet Index, attendance, knowledge level, analytical parameters and the prevalence of other risk factors were measured in both groups before and after 6 months follow-up. No significant differences were detected between the two groups initially. At 6 months, both groups significantly lowered their BP; the only differences observed between groups (IG vs. CG) were: the number of correct answers to the questionnaire (14.5 +/- 3.7 vs. 12.9 +/- 3.7, P less than 0.01), the rate of occasional therapeutic abandonment (10.3 vs. 25%, P less than 0.05), 24 h sodium excretion (97 +/- 45 vs. 127 +/- 68 mmol/l, P less than 0.01) and the number of withdrawals (39 vs. 25%, P less than 0.05). We conclude that in spite of increased knowledge, less frequent abandonment of drug treatment and better observance of a low salt diet, patients in the IG had an increase in the number of drop-outs. Our data suggest that education in hypertension clinics should play a supportive role rather than a primary one in the control of high blood pressure. Screening of 6,144 patients in a general practice clinic to assist physician case-finding uncovered 983 (16%) who were uncontrolled hypertensives. Following physician recommendation, 115 patients volunteered for a controlled trial to test the effectiveness of supplementary strategies to the pharmaceutical management of high blood pressure. A study of nonparticipants indicated that about 7% of the practice population was eligible for cardiovascular health education. One group received a health education program, a second was allocated to self-monitor their blood pressure for 6 months, a third group was allocated to both strategies, and the final group, acting as a control, continued to receive their usual care. Physician monitoring of patients continued for the duration of the study and blood pressures decreased in all patients. The study's most important outcome was the joint reduction of blood pressure and medication strength. These were assessed by a "blind" clinician before and after the interventions according to criteria set out in the "stepped-care" approach to management of high blood pressure. People allocated to a health education program conducted in the doctor's common room did twice as well on this measure as those who were not so educated. Daily self-monitoring of blood pressure for 6 months proved to be too much for the majority of those so instructed. It is concluded that the general practice setting remains an important place for health education to prevent cardiac disease and suggestions are made for incorporating this into everyday practice. Does free medical care lead to better health than insurance plans that require the patient to shoulder part of the cost? In an effort to answer this question, we studied 3958 people between the ages of 14 and 61 who were free of disability that precluded work and had been randomly assigned to a set of insurance plans for three or five years. One plan provided free care; the others required enrollees to pay a share of their medical bills. As previously reported, patients in the latter group made approximately one-third fewer visits to a physician and were hospitalized about one-third less often. For persons with poor vision and for low-income persons with high blood pressure, free care brought an improvement (vision better by 0.2 Snellen lines, diastolic blood pressure lower by 3 mm Hg); better control of blood pressure reduced the calculated risk of early death among those at high risk. For the average participant, as well as for subgroups differing in income and initial health status, no significant effects were detected on eight other measures of health status and health habits. Confidence intervals for these eight measures were sufficiently narrow to rule out all but a minimal influence, favorable or adverse, of free care for the average participant. For some measures of health in subgroups of the population, however, the broader confidence intervals make this conclusion less certain. A randomized controlled trial of an information and medical record booklet designed to improve patient understanding and participation in the management of hypertension was conducted in six inner London general practices. After one year there were no significant differences between the group who had received the booklets and the control group in mean systolic or diastolic blood pressure, but the study group scored significantly higher on knowledge about hypertension and its management. However, the difference between the two groups was small, possibly because both groups started with a high level of understanding about hypertension and its management. In addition, the mean diastolic blood pressure in the control group showed that the treatment provided was already satisfactory, and that there was little need for improvement. Nevertheless, the information booklet evaluated in this study provides health professionals with a highly acceptable method of informing the patient about hypertension and its management and could be used both in hospital and general practice. African Americans have a higher prevalence and greater severity of hypertension than do other minorities and whites. This fact is particularly problematic when one realizes that the rate of control and treatment of hypertension in the US population is getting worse rather than better. Alternative strategies to promote blood pressure control need to be tested.
                The purpose of this pilot study was to test the following hypothesis: Persons who participate in nurse-managed home telemonitoring (HT) plus usual care or who participate in nurse-managed community-based monitoring (CBM) plus usual care will have greater improvement in blood pressure from baseline to 3 months' follow-up than will persons who receive usual care only.
                This study used a randomized controlled design; participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups that were stratified by use or nonuse of antihypertension medication. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) controlling for age and body weight were used to determine changes in blood pressure from baseline to 3 months. The sample contained 26 African Americans with a mean age of 59 years.
                Both the HT group and the CBM group had clinically and statistically significant (P <.05) drops in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) at 3 months' follow-up, with participants in the HT group demonstrating the greatest improvement (HT: baseline SBP 148.8 +/- 13.8, DBP 90.2 +/- 5.79; 3 months' follow-up SBP 124.1 +/- 13.82, DBP 75.58 +/- 11.4; CBM: baseline SBP 155.25 +/- 17.014, DBP 89.42 +/- 10.95; 3 months' follow-up SBP 142.3 +/- 12.1, DBP 78.25 +/- 6.86). There was little change in SBP or DBP at 3 months' follow-up in the usual care only group.
                These are important pilot results, which if replicated in a larger sample will significantly improve care for urban African Americans with hypertension. An automated surveillance system utilizing a computer-based medical record system (COSTAR) was designed to improve the follow-up of patients with newly identified elevated diastolic blood pressure. A population of patients was selected where, in the 6-month period following the initial measurement of an elevated diastolic blood pressure, there were fewer than two visits during which blood pressure was recorded. In a randomized controlled clinical trial, this poor follow-up population was divided into two groups, with computer-generated reminders being automatically generated for only patients in the experimental group. Follow-up was significantly improved in the group receiving the reminders, both in terms of rate of follow-up attempted or achieved by the responsible physician and in the repeated recording of blood pressure. We conclude that a computer-based reminder system improves follow-up of newly discovered elevation in diastolic blood pressure. To study the efficacy of telephone and mail intervention in therapeutic compliance among patients with mild to moderate hypertension.
                A prospective controlled multicenter clinical trial.
                Eighty-five primary care centers in Spain, with a duration of 6 months.
                A total of 636 patients with newly diagnosed or uncontrolled hypertension were included. Interventions. The patients were randomized and distributed between the following groups: (i) control (CG) - under routine clinical management; (ii) mail intervention (MIG) - received a mailed message reinforcing compliance and reminding of the visits (15 days, 2 and 4 months); (iii) telephone intervention (TIG) - received a telephone call at 15 days, then at 7 and 15 weeks.
                Five visits were scheduled, with the measurement of blood pressure and counting of tablets. Compliers were defined as subjects showing 80-110% drug consumption. Calculations were made of mean percentage compliance (MPC) and compliers, mean blood pressure and percentage controlled subjects.
                Five hundred and thirty-eight patients completed the study (261 males); 85.5% were compliers (CI = 82.5-88.5; n = 460). The MPC was 95.1+/-19.6% (CI = 93.28-96.92). The CG consisted of 182 individuals, MIG = 172 and TIG = 184. Compliers represented 69.2% of the CG (CI 62.5-75.9%), 91.3% (CI = 87.1-95.5) of the MIG (p = 0.0001) and 96.2% of the TIG (CI 93.5-98.9%); the final MPC was 89.6%+/-15 in CG, 96.6%+/-12 in MIG and 99.1+/-26.8 in TIG (p = 0.0001). The percentage of controlled subjects was 47.2% in CG (CI = 40-54.4), 61.3% in MIG (CI = 54.1-68.5%) and 63.3% in TIG (CI = 56.4-70.2%) (p<0.05).
                TIG and MIG are effective measures for improving patient compliance in hypertension. To investigate the effect of a computer based clinical decision support system and a risk chart on absolute cardiovascular risk, blood pressure, and prescribing of cardiovascular drugs in hypertensive patients.
                Cluster randomised controlled trial.
                27 general practices in Avon.
                614 patients aged between 60 and 79 years with high blood pressure.
                Patients were randomised to computer based clinical decision support system plus cardiovascular risk chart; cardiovascular risk chart alone; or usual care.
                Percentage of patients in each group with a five year cardiovascular risk >/=10%, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, prescribing of cardiovascular drugs.
                Patients in the computer based clinical decision support system and chart only groups were no more likely to have cardiovascular risk reduced to below 10% than patients receiving usual care. Patients in the computer based clinical decision support group were more likely to have a cardiovascular risk >/=10% than chart only patients, odds ratio 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 4.8). The chart only group had significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared with the usual care group (difference in means -4.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval -8.4 to -0.8)). Reduction of diastolic blood pressure did not differ between the three groups. The chart only group were twice as likely to be prescribed two classes of cardiovascular drugs and over three times as likely to be prescribed three or more classes of drugs compared with the other groups.
                The computer based clinical decision support system did not confer any benefit in absolute risk reduction or blood pressure control and requires further development and evaluation before use in clinical care can be recommended. Use of chart guidelines are associated with a potentially important reduction in systolic blood pressure. Poor adherence to antihypertensive drug regimens is believed to be a major contributor to treatment failure. Electronic monitoring of adherence may improve adherence and allow differentiation between those who are nonadherent and those who are pharmacologically nonresponsive. This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of electronic monitoring of adherence in lowering blood pressure (BP) in comparison with usual care.
                A total of 258 patients with high BP despite use of antihypertensive medication were randomly assigned to either continuation of usual care (with adjustment in antihypertensive medication if necessary) or to the introduction of electronic monitoring. Adherence to antihypertensive medication was monitored for 2 months without medication changes. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients who reached target BP levels after a 5-month follow-up period.
                At 5 months, 50.6% of the patients in the usual care group reached adequate BP, v 53.7% in the electronic monitoring group (P = .73). The percentages of patients with drug additions or increases in dosage were higher in the usual care group compared with those in whom adherence was monitored (P < .01).
                These data show that electronic monitoring in comparison to usual care results in similar BP control but leads to fewer drug changes and less drug use. This result is likely to be achieved by improving adherence. Hence a strategy that includes electronic monitoring has the potential to prevent unnecessary treatment escalation in patients with poor adherence. The hypothesis that general practitioners would obtain better outcomes for patients with hypertension using a computer than doctors not using a computer was tested. Sixty family physicians were randomised to two treatment strategies. "Test" physicians completed a data collection form after each visit from a patient with hypertension and mailed the forms to the test centre for processing. Computer feedback on management was mailed to the doctors. This encouraged doctors to apply the "stepped care" protocol, supplied charts of diastolic blood pressure v time, and ranked patients' diastolic blood pressures by percentile. Letters were mailed to patients to remind them of appointments. "Control" doctors filled out the same data collection forms as test physicians, but neither doctors nor patients received computer feedback. Physicians who used the computer saw more patients per practice than control doctors (test 50 patients, control 40). For all patients the length of follow up was significantly longer in test practices (test 199 days, control 167), and a smaller percentage dropped out of active treatment in test practices (test 37.5%, control 42.1%). For patients with "moderate" hypertension of a baseline diastolic pressure of greater than 104 mm Hg the mean score of the last recorded pressure was below the goal of 90 mm Hg in test practices (88.5 mm Hg), but it failed to reach this goal in control practices (93.3 mm Hg). A greater average reduction of diastolic pressure was achieved in test practices (test 21.7 mm Hg, control 16.7 mm Hg). Though patients with "moderate" hypertension were better controlled in test practices than in control practices, the patients in test practices visited their doctors less often (test 13.3 visits per patient-year, control 17.4 visits). Among patients with newly detected hypertension test practices achieved a greater reduction in diastolic pressure than control practices (test 15.1 mm Hg v control 11.3 mm Hg) and more sustained control of hypertension (test 323 days per patient-year with a diastolic pressure of 90 mm Hg or less v control 259 days). In Mexico, hypertension is a major cause of disability and death in the elderly, but the most effective way to promote behaviour change in old people is unknown. Low resource interventions that are effective in normal healthcare settings are urgently needed. We report the results of a randomized trial of nurse-provided health and lifestyle advice during home visits to elderly people with hypertension in Mexico City.
                Subjects were 718 people with hypertension aged > or =60 years, who were residents of Mexico City and were registered with the Family Medicine Clinics of the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS). A randomized controlled trial was carried out in which the intervention group was offered nurse visits over 6 months with blood pressure checks and negotiated lifestyle changes. The control group continued to receive usual care.
                After 6 months, 36.5% of the intervention versus 6.8% of the control group had a blood pressure of <160/90 mmHg. The difference in the mean change in systolic blood pressure was 3.31 mmHg (P = 0.03, 95% CI : 6.32, 0.29) and the same difference in diastolic blood pressure was 3.67 mmHg (P = 0.00, 95% CI : 5.22, 2.12). Weight and sodium excretion fell more in the intervention group, but the difference was not significant.
                Nurse home visits are effective in reducing blood pressure in hypertensive patients aged > or =60 years. nan Three educational interventions for the control of essential hypertension in ambulatory patients were based on analyses of the educational needs of patients and providers. The educational program increased reported compliance with medication, improved the proportion of patients losing weight, and improved appointment keeping. Most important, there was a favorable effect on blood pressure (BP) control. The proportion of patients with BP under control in the group assigned to all three interventions increased by 28% (from 38% to 66%), while the proportion in the control group receiving standard medical therapy with no educational interventions remained unchanged at 42%. Home measurement of blood pressure (BP) can improve compliance. The aim of this study was to evaluate if the efficacy of losartan in hypertension could be enhanced by providing patients with a device for home BP measurement. In this open, randomised, prospective, multi-centre study in 244 Swiss practices, patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomised to a group receiving a home BP measuring device (OMRON) (group 2), or to a group where this device was not provided (group 1). After 8 weeks of treatment with losartan, the responder rates between subjects performing home measurement of BP were compared with those without self-measurement, whereby exclusively sphygmomanometric office BP values were considered. A total of 622 subjects completed the study. Treatment with losartan significantly reduced diastolic (DBP) and systolic BP (SBP) (P < 0.0001). Overall, the group with home BP measurement showed an increased responder rate (DBP < or =90 mm Hg) by 6.4% (59.8% vs 66.2%; 0.05 < P < 0.1). This difference was mainly due to female patients (64.1% vs 73.2%), where it reached statistical significance (P < 0.01). Pretreated patients showed a 9.0% improvement of response in the home measurement group as well (0.05 < P < 0.1). The responder rate in newly treated subjects was relatively high, reaching 79.5% (DBP < or =90 mm Hg or reduction > or =10 mm Hg DBP from baseline). However, home measurement did not significantly improve BP control in these new patients (81.4% vs 77.7%). Overall, home measurement can lead to a slight improvement of BP control. This improvement was most evident in females, reaching significance. Evidence is sparse concerning the value of the "educational" materials that physicians receive in the mail. We conducted a randomized trial of a mailed continuing education program on hypertension for primary care physicians. Although formal pretesting documented that the program led to significant improvements in physician knowledge over the short term, the current study showed no lasting effect on physician knowledge (mean scores on an end-of-study questionnaire were 50% and 52% for study and control physicians, respectively) and no influence on performance in lowering the blood pressures of patients referred from screening (mean blood pressure drop for study patients, 12.2/10.4 mm Hg vs 13.0/10.6 mm Hg for control patients). The chance that we missed a difference in diastolic blood pressure as great as 3 mm Hg is less than 5%. Resources spent on instructional materials mailed to physicians may be wasted. The clinical efficacy of using specially trained nurses to treat hypertension at the patient's place of work was compared in a controlled trial with management by the patient's family doctor. The 457 study participants were selected from 21 906 volunteers in industry and government whose blood-pressure was screened. The nurses were allowed to prescribe and change drug therapy at the work site without prior physician approval. Patients randomly allocated to receive care at work were significantly more likely to be put on antihypertensive medications (94.7% vs 62.7%, to reach goal blood-pressure in the first six months (48.5% vs 27.5%), and to take the drugs prescribed (67.6% vs 49.1%). Only 6% of patients were dissatisfied with the care provided by the nurses. Thus provision of care at work by specially tranined nurses was well accepted and resulted in significantly improved blood-pressure control and medication compliance among employees with asymptomatic and uncomplicated hypertension. It is widely believed that patients' compliance can be increased by persuading them to participate in their own care. We tested whether patients with hypertension could manage their own clinical records and whether their doing so would affect the quality of their care. Two hundred patients were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group. Those in the intervention group were asked to complete a 10-page booklet containing a personal standardized medical record. All patients were scheduled for a follow-up appointment at the end of one year and were referred to their general practitioners for interim care. At the end of the follow-up period, the proportion of patients seen was comparable in the two groups. More of the patients in the intervention group than in the control group filled out a questionnaire as requested, and more added comments. Within the intervention group, the proportion of patients seen and the fall in systolic blood pressure were significantly higher among the 44 patients who had completed the personal record as requested than among the 57 who had not. Patients who completed the personal record also had fewer compliance problems. To evaluate the implementation of clinical guidelines for hypertension in general practice by use of a computer-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) and a specific implementation strategy. Evaluation of patient outcome.
                Randomised study with health centres as units. The intervention group had the CDSS installed and made ready for use, doctors and assistants were trained and received a user-manual, the doctors were offered telephone repetitions, a seminar in risk intervention and, at the same seminar, further demonstration of the CDSS. The doctors received baseline registrations with information of how they treated their own hypertensive patients, and use of the CDSS was checked repeatedly.
                General practice in Sør- and Nord-Trøndelag counties in Norway, 380,000 inhabitants.
                Seventeen health centres with 24 doctors and 984 patients in the intervention group. Data from 879 patients used in the final analyses. Twelve health centres with 29 doctors and 1255 patients in the control group. Data from 1119 patients used in the final analyses.
                After an intervention period of 18 months, group differences in level of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, body mass index, and risk score for myocardial infarction were calculated, as well as group differences in fractions of smokers.
                Significant group difference in favour of intervention group: diastolic blood pressure 1 mmHg (95% CI -1.89, -0.17). However, a significant baseline difference in systolic blood pressure in favour of control group of 2.7 mmHg (95% CI 1.0, 4.5) had been reduced to 1.2 mmHg (95% CI -0.6, 3.0) after intervention.
                Implementation of clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertensive patients in general practice by means of a CDSS and several other procedures for implementation did not affect patient outcome in any clinically significant way. The authors examined the effects of a comprehensive lifestyle modification intervention on blood pressure (BP) and other cardiovascular risk factors in hypertensive patients. A total of 70 participants were randomly placed into either a lifestyle intervention or a control group. Four education classes and individual counseling sessions were held for the intervention group. Participants in the control group were provided with routine outpatient services and were asked to maintain their usual lifestyle. Data were gathered at baseline and at the end of 6 months. At the end of 6 months, BP, body weight, body mass index, waist circumference, and fasting lipids, apart from high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, significantly declined in the intervention group. Healthpromoting lifestyle scores of the intervention group had increased significantly compared to those of the control group. In conclusion, the results demonstrate the feasibility of comprehensive lifestyle modification and show its beneficial effects. Three health education interventions for urban poor hypertensive patients were introduced sequentially in a randomized factorial design: 1) an exit interview to increase understanding of and compliance with the prescribed regimen; 2) a home visit to encourage a family member to provide support for the patient's regimen; and 3) invitations to small group sessions to increase the patient's confidence and ability to manage his/her problem. Previous evaluation of the initial two-year experience demonstrated a positive effect of the educational program on compliance with the medical treatment and blood pressure control. Data accumulated over an additional three years, including mortality analysis, are now presented. The study group consisted of the same cohort of 400 ambulatory hypertensive outpatients in the eight experimental and control groups. The five-year analysis shows a continuing positive effect on appointment keeping, weight control, and blood pressure control. All-cause life table mortality rate was 57.3 per cent less for the experimental group compared to the control group (12.9/100 vs 30.2/100, p less than .05), while the hypertension-related mortality rate was 53.2 per cent less (8.9/100 vs 19.0/100, p less than .01). The results from this longitudinal study provide evidence to encourage health practitioners to utilize such educational programs in the long-term management and control of high blood pressure. Compliance with physician recommendations among long-term hypertensive patients can be a chronic and difficult treatment problem. This study evaluated the relative effectiveness of additional patient education and psychosocial counseling in improving patient compliance. At a family practice clinic, 123 low income, rural, black hypertensive patients were pretested on several psychological characteristics and randomly assigned to one of three groups: vigorous, group patient education and family physician appointments; supportive, individualized psychosocial counseling and family physician appointments; or family physician appointments only, which was the baseline medical care. Intervention and follow-up each lasted three months, and the intervention was in addition to the patients' baseline medical care. Compliance was measured by: keeping follow-up appointments; bringing antihypertension medications to each appointment; consuming these medications; and diastolic blood pressure. Analysis of variance of group mean and change scores, t tests, and chisquare analysis indicated that neither additional patient education nor additional psychosocial counseling improved compliance or blood pressure control significantly better than regular family physician visits alone. Discrepancies between clinical guidelines and clinical practice call for practical implementation strategies. This study evaluates the implementation of clinical guidelines for hypertension in general practice with a specific computer-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) as part of the intervention. We carried out a randomized study of general practice health centres in Sør- and Nord-Trøndelag counties in Norway (population 380000). A total of 17 health centres were included, with 24 doctors and 984 patients in the intervention group. Data from 887 patients was used in the analyses. There were 12 health centres with 29 doctors and 1255 patients in the control group. Data from 1127 control patients was used in the analyses. The main outcome measures were doctor's behaviour, measured by adherence to registration of recommended variables in the Norwegian clinical guidelines for hypertension. The aim of the intervention was to lower the fractions of patients without registrations. However, there were no clinically significant differences between the intervention group and the control group for fractions of patients without registration of blood pressure (intervention group 14.3%, control group 14.2%) or serum cholesterol (62.3% vs. 56.8%) during 12 months, nor, during 18 months, for fractions of patients without a registration of cigarette smoking (82.9% vs. 87.1%), cardiovascular inheritance (79.5% vs. 73.4%) and body mass index (81.5% vs. 89.2%). One or several variables necessary for calculation of risk score for myocardial infarction were missing in 91.7% of patients in the intervention group and 91.9% of patients in the control group. Large centre variations were shown for all variables. Implementation of clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertensive patients in general practice, by means of a CDSS and several procedures for implementation did not result in clinically significant changes in the doctors' behaviour. Of importance are both the lack of user-friendliness of the specific CDSS and problems in performing time-consuming multidimensional procedures. We evaluated the effects of an appointment reminder system on the appointment-keeping behavior and blood pressure control status of hypertensive patients receiving care in an urban medical clinic. The study population consisted of 973 adult hypertensive patients receiving medical care at a family practice clinic affiliated with the Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan. Of the 973 patients enrolled in the study, 486 were randomly assigned to a group that received appointment reminder cards and telephone calls to reschedule missed appointments, and 487 were assigned to a nonintervention control group. Patients were followed-up with regard to their appointment-keeping behavior and blood pressure control status, five to eight months after being entered in the study. The study results indicate that patients in the appointment reminder group kept significantly more appointments and were less likely to drop out of treatment than patients in the control group. The dropout rate was 46 percent lower among patients in the appointment reminder group than in the control group. Patients in the appointment reminder group also demonstrated slightly better blood pressure control at the end of the study compared with patients in the control group, although none of the differences in blood pressure levels between groups were statistically significant at the 5 percent level. To assess the effectiveness of mailed hypertension educational materials.
                Prospective, randomized, controlled single-blind trial.
                Primary care practice-based research network in which 9 clinics located in Portland, Oregon participated.
                Patients with mildly uncontrolled hypertension as defined as a last blood pressure of 140 to 159/90 to 99 mmHg from query of an electronic medical record database.
                Patients randomized to intervention were mailed 2 educational packets approximately 3 months apart. The first mailer included a letter from each patient's primary care provider. The mailer included a booklet providing an overview of hypertension and lifestyle modification and a refrigerator magnet noting target blood pressure. The second mailing also included a letter from the patient's primary care provider, a second educational booklet focused on medication compliance and home blood pressure monitoring, and a blood pressure logbook. The control group consisted of similar patients receiving usual care for hypertension.
                Patients from each group were randomly selected for invitation to participate in a study visit to measure blood pressure and complete a survey (intervention n= 162; control n= 150). No significant difference was found in mean blood pressure between intervention and control patients (135/77 mmHg vs 137/77 mmHg; P=.229). Patients in the intervention arm scored higher on a hypertension knowledge quiz (7.48 +/- 1.6 vs 7.06 +/- 1.6; P=.019), and reported higher satisfaction with several aspects of their care. No significant difference was seen in the prevalence of home blood pressure monitoring ownership or use.
                In patients with mildly uncontrolled hypertension, educational mailers did not yield a significant decrease in blood pressure. However, significant improvement in patient knowledge, frequency of home monitoring, and satisfaction with care were demonstrated. To assess whether blood pressure control in primary care could be improved with the use of patient held targets and self monitoring in a practice setting, and to assess the impact of these on health behaviours, anxiety, prescribed antihypertensive drugs, patients' preferences, and costs.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                Eight general practices in south Birmingham.
                441 people receiving treatment in primary care for hypertension but not controlled below the target of < 140/85 mm Hg.
                Patients in the intervention group received treatment targets along with facilities to measure their own blood pressure at their general practice; they were also asked to visit their general practitioner or practice nurse if their blood pressure was repeatedly above the target level. Patients in the control group received usual care (blood pressure monitoring by their practice).
                Primary outcome: change in systolic blood pressure at six months and one year in both intervention and control groups. Secondary outcomes: change in health behaviours, anxiety, prescribed antihypertensive drugs, patients' preferences of method of blood pressure monitoring, and costs.
                400 (91%) patients attended follow up at one year. Systolic blood pressure in the intervention group had significantly reduced after six months (mean difference 4.3 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 0.8 mm Hg to 7.9 mm Hg)) but not after one year (mean difference 2.7 mm Hg (- 1.2 mm Hg to 6.6 mm Hg)). No overall difference was found in diastolic blood pressure, anxiety, health behaviours, or number of prescribed drugs. Patients who self monitored lost more weight than controls (as evidenced by a drop in body mass index), rated self monitoring above monitoring by a doctor or nurse, and consulted less often. Overall, self monitoring did not cost significantly more than usual care (251 pounds sterling (437 dollars; 364 euros) (95% confidence interval 233 pounds sterling to 275 pounds sterling) versus 240 pounds sterling (217 pounds sterling to 263 pounds sterling).
                Practice based self monitoring resulted in small but significant improvements of blood pressure at six months, which were not sustained after a year. Self monitoring was well received by patients, anxiety did not increase, and there was no appreciable additional cost. Practice based self monitoring is feasible and results in blood pressure control that is similar to that in usual care. To determine the effectiveness of specialist nurse delivered education in primary care to improve control of hypertension and hyperlipidaemia in patients with diabetes.
                Practice-level randomized controlled trial, Salford, England.
                From 44 practices, 10 303 subjects presenting in general practice with raised blood pressure (= 140/80 mmHg), raised total cholesterol (= 5.0 mmol/l) or both.
                Practices were randomized to receive either the intervention for hyperlipidaemia or for hypertension; practices acted as control for the intervention not received. Specialist nurses arranged a schedule of visits with general practitioners and general practice nurses, reminding them of diabetes protocols and clinical targets. They provided educational materials and protocols used in secondary care for nurse and doctor interventions including stepping up pharmacotherapy when necessary. Practices received a list of patients in their practice who were poorly controlled at their last annual review; new and recalled patients were targeted.
                At subsequent annual review, blood pressure and total cholesterol values were obtained from the Salford electronic diabetes register for patients from participating practices.
                Overall, specialist nurse-led educational outreach to primary care was associated with no improvement in patients achieving target after 1 year-odds ratio (OR): 1.03 (95% CI 0.95-1.11; P = 0.52). Similar results were achieved with hyperlipidaemia OR: 1.04 (95% CI 0.88-1.23; P = 0.62) and hypertension OR: 1.01 (95% CI 0.80-1.27; P = 0.93).
                This study provides evidence that the use of specialist nurses to perform educational outreach to improve target adherence to patients with diabetes in primary care is not effective.
Family practices and community-based clinics need to have an organized system of regular follow-up and review of their hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a vigorous stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels. Self-monitoring and appointment reminders may be useful adjuncts to the above strategies to improve blood pressure control but require further evaluation.