The effects of patterned urge-response toileting (PURT) on urinary incontinence among nursing home residents. Predicting success using individualized scheduled toileting for memory-impaired elders at home. The effects of a continence program on frail community-dwelling elderly persons.
To test an individualized form of habit training for urinary incontinence (UI) among long-stay cognitively and/or physically impaired elderly nursing home residents over time.
                Randomization of subjects occurred by nursing home unit. Baseline wet checks were done hourly for one 24-hour period at 3-week intervals over 12 weeks followed by 72 hours of continuous electronic monitoring to establish precise voiding patterns for each subject. The 12-week intervention period was administered by indigenous staff after they attended a 4-hour UI educational program. Subjects were followed an additional 12 weeks to determine the extent of maintenance of the intervention among staff and subjects.
                Four non-profit nursing homes; west, mid-west, east coast.
                Consent was obtained from 154 (71%) who met primary inclusion criteria. Forty-one failed the secondary inclusion criteria leaving 113 who entered the 37-week study. Eighty-eight completed the study (experimental = 51, control = 37); all were physically and/or mentally impaired, averaged age 85, and had either urge or urge/stress UI.
                UI was significantly decreased during the 3-month period (P less than 0.001). Eighty-six percent showed improvement over baseline while one-third improved 25% or more over their baseline UI rate. The control group's UI increased during the same period of time. The volume of UI among the experimental group also decreased (P less than 0.005) while the control group's UI volume increased.
                The training program was effective in reducing UI though compliance among nursing staff averaged only 70% of the prescribed toileting times. The success of this approach is similar to other recently described behavioral programs but achieved the reduction using only regular nursing staff. This individualized approach supports the recent regulatory thrust to individualize care to promote and maintain functional abilities and autonomy. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized scheduled toileting (IST) program on incontinent, memory-impaired elders being cared for at home. Using a 2 x 2 mixed design analysis of variance (group by time), 118 patients were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. Caregivers in the experimental group were taught the IST procedure. Urinary incontinence (UI) was measured at baseline and at 6 months. Weeklong voiding records were kept by caregivers and were used to calculate the percentage of times the incontinence occurred. UI significantly decreased in the experimental group, whereas in the control group it did not. The baseline cognitive ability, mobility, and consistency of implementing IST were entered into a discriminant function equation and significantly predicted patients who would improve with IST. Cognitive ability was the best predictor, with mobility also emerging as a meaningful predictor. Candidates for IST should be selected based on elders' cognitive ability and their ability to cooperate with toileting. Moderately cognitively impaired elders and ones able to cooperate with toileting protocols are prime candidates for IST.
                Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Urinary incontinence among community-dwelling frail elderly is estimated to affect 6.23 million people at an annual cost of over $7 billion. Overwhelmed caregivers may seek institutional placement of their incontinent family member. Results from this study of 78 subjects demonstrate that even in physically and cognitively impaired persons a behavioral treatment program can reduce incontinence, lower costs, and relieve caregiver burden.
The features of habit retraining programmes vary. Adherence to the protocol appears to be problematic for carers. The evidence from the four reviewed trials is too limited to judge whether or not there are improvements in continence that would make investment in habit-retraining programmes worthwhile.