A randomized double-blind controlled study of nimodipine in acute cerebral ischemic stroke. Isradipine in patients with acute ischaemic cerebral infarction. An overview of the ASCLEPIOS Programme. Very Early Nimodipine Use in Stroke (VENUS): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Flunarizine in stroke treatment (FIST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Scandinavia and the Netherlands. Should hypertension be treated after acute stroke? A randomized controlled trial using single photon emission computed tomography. Nimodipine and perfusion changes after stroke. Effect of nimodipine on memory after cerebral infarction. Nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke: a double-blind controlled study. A double-blind, randomized trial of PY108-068 in acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Flunarizine in acute ischemic stroke: a pilot study. The effects of nimodipine on the clinical course of patients with acute ischemic stroke. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. Placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in the treatment of acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Double-blind study of nimodipine in non-severe stroke. Clinical trial of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. The American Nimodipine Study Group. Effect of nimodipine on regional cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with acute ischemic stroke as measured by positron emission tomography. Effects of fasudil in acute ischemic stroke: results of a prospective placebo-controlled double-blind trial.
A randomized placebo controlled double-blind clinical trial of nimodipine was conducted in 31 patients of acute cerebral infarction. Nimodipine was administered in dosage of 120 mg/day for 28 days. Treatment was begun within 48 hours of ischemic stroke. Diagnosis was confirmed by computed tomographic (CT) scan. Similar number of patients (control) received placebo. Neurological assessment was done at the time of entry into the trial, and after 4 weeks, by using Mathew's scale. After four weeks of treatment with nimodipine or placebo, Mathew's scale score improved significantly (< 0.001) in both groups, but difference in mean score between two groups was insignificant (> 0.05). However, significant difference (< 0.05) was noted in relative change in neurological deficit (mean X-value) of two groups. The nimodipine group had higher value in scores on Mathew's scale. No adverse reaction, was observed in either group. The study suggests a beneficial a effect of nimodipine in acute cerebral ischaemia. Calcium-related mechanisms are an integral part of metabolic reactions during acute cerebral infarction. In an animal model of stroke, the calcium antagonist isradipine was shown to protect neurons against ischaemia. In order to improve the neurological and functional outcome of human stroke patients, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre study was started in up to 600 patients with acute ischaemic brain infarction. Since early treatment is considered to be of great importance, patients must be recruited no more than 12 hours after stroke onset. Medical, ECG, laboratory, neurological and functional evaluations are conducted for up to 90 days after stroke. The Very Early Nimodipine Use in Stroke (VENUS) trial was designed to test the hypothesis that early treatment with nimodipine has a positive effect on survival and functional outcome after stroke. This was suggested in a previous meta-analysis on the use of nimodipine in stroke. However, in a recent Cochrane review we were unable to reproduce these positive results. This led to the early termination of VENUS after an interim analysis.
                In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment was started by general practitioners or neurologists within 6 hours after stroke onset (oral nimodipine 30 mg QID or identical placebo, for 10 days). Main analyses included comparisons of the primary end point (poor outcome, defined as death or dependency after 3 months) and secondary end points (neurological status and blood pressure 24 hours after inclusion, mortality after 10 days, and adverse events) between treatment groups. Subgroup analyses (on final diagnosis and based on the per-protocol data set) were performed.
                At trial termination, after inclusion of 454 patients (225 nimodipine, 229 placebo), no effect of nimodipine was found. After 3 months of follow-up, 32% (n=71) of patients in the nimodipine group had a poor outcome compared with 27% (n=62) in the placebo group (relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.6). A treatment effect was not found for secondary outcomes and in the subgroup analyses.
                The results of VENUS do not support the hypothesis of a beneficial effect of early nimodipine in stroke patients. An international, multicenter trial was conducted in 331 patients to determine the effect of a large dose of flunarizine (a calcium entry blocker) in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the territory of the Middle cerebral artery.
                The administration of the trial medication should start within 24 h after the initial symptoms of stroke. According to a random schedule, the patients were assigned to a 4-weeks double-blind treatment with either flunarizine (n = 166) or placebo (n = 165): one week intravenous administration (50 mg daily), followed by 3 weeks oral treatment (week 2, 21 mg daily; week 3-4, 7 mg daily). All patients had to be investigated by computerized tomography (CT) within 7 days after stroke onset; 36 patients were secundarily excluded because the CT showed another pathology. During the treatment period, other "stroke therapies" were not allowed. Patients were followed up for 24 weeks.
                After the 24 weeks trial period, the percentage of patients who were dead or pendent (modified Rankin score 3-5) was similar in both treatment groups (flunarizine 67%, placebo 65%). During the trial, the scores for handicap severity (modified Rankin scale), neurological status (Orgogozo) and activities of daily living (modified Barthel index) strongly improved in both treatment groups, but no differences were found between the treatment groups. In this trial, the administration of trial treatment started relatively late after stroke onset (flunarizine group: mean time interval 13.5 h; placebo 12.3 h). A subgroup of patients received trial medication within 6 h after stroke onset (flunarizine n = 31; placebo n = 29). Also in this subgroup, no differences were found between the flunarizine and placebo group.
                Flunarizine did not improve neurologic and functional outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To determine if previously hypertensive patients with acute ischemic stroke should be treated with antihypertensive medication in the immediate poststroke period.
                Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Sixteen consecutive hypertensive patients (four men and 12 women; mean age, 66 years [age range, 46 to 83 years]) with middle cerebral artery infarction within 72 hours of onset and blood pressure between 170 and 220 mm Hg(systolic) and 95 and 120 mm Hg (diastolic).
                Placebo (n = 6), nicardipine hydrochloride (20 mg [n = 5]), captopril (12.5 mg [n = 3]), or clonidine hydrochloride (0.1 mg [n = 2]) given every 8 hours for 3 days.
                Decline in blood pressure, change in cerebral blood flow as measured by single photon emission computed tomography, and clinical change as determined by the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
                Blood pressure fell significantly in both the drug-treated group as a whole and in those patients receiving placebo (P < .001). There was no difference in blood pressure levels between these two groups throughout the study period. Patients receiving nicardipine had a consistently lower pressure than the other groups. A significant negative relationship was noted between the maximum blood pressure fall and improvement in cerebral blood flow. There were four patients whose blood pressure dropped by more than 16% of the baseline value on any 24 hours in the first 3 days. All either failed to increase or actually decreased their cerebral blood flow to the affected area. Three of these patients were treated with nicardipine. There was no significant difference in clinical course between the placebo-and drug-treated groups as a whole.
                Hypertensive ischemic stroke patients with a moderate elevation of blood pressure in the first few days may not require antihypertensive therapy. Nicardipine and possibly other calcium channel blockers may cause an excessive fall in blood pressure and impair cerebral blood flow in these patients and should therefore be used with caution. Meta-analysis of previous trials of oral nimodipine in acute stroke has suggested a benefit when commenced within 12 hours of onset. We sought to study the effect of oral nimodipine on reperfusion after acute stroke and the relation between reperfusion and outcome.
                Fifty patients with acute middle cerebral artery territory cortical infarction were blindly randomized within 12 hours of onset to either oral nimodipine (30 mg every 6 hours) or placebo. Treatment was continued for 2 weeks. Cerebral blood flow was assessed with the use of 99mTc-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime single-photon emission CT before therapy, 24 hours later, and at 3 months. Hypoperfusion was measured by a validated volumetric technique. Neurological impairment and functional outcome were assessed with the Canadian Neurological Scale and Barthel Index, respectively. Tissue loss was measured with CT at 3 months. Four patients were excluded from analysis for technical reasons.
                Twenty-three patients received nimodipine, and 23 received placebo. In the nimodipine group, there was early reperfusion that was not maintained at outcome (P=0.01). In the placebo group, mean infarct hypoperfusion volumes showed no overall change. Nonnutritional reperfusion in nimodipine-treated patients was associated with adverse neurological (P=0.05) and functional outcome (P=0.06). There was, however, no difference in clinical outcome between the 2 groups.
                Oral nimodipine administered within 12 hours enhanced acute reperfusion, but this was largely nonnutritional. Larger studies using a shorter treatment delay are required to evaluate the clinical efficacy of nimodipine in acute ischemic stroke. Epidemiological studies indicate widespread memory impairment in patients with stroke in the early post-ictal stage. Nimodipine may have psychopharmacological properties and may improve memory. We conducted a single-blind randomized controlled trial to determine whether nimodipine given 7-14 days after cerebral infarction improved memory.
                One hundred patients with acute cerebral infarction were consecutively enrolled between D7 to D14. After stratification, patients were randomized to receive oral nimodipine 90 mg daily for 12 weeks, or no drug. Independent assessors administered Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Fuld Object-Memory Evaluation (FOME) at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks.
                Patients receiving nimodipine showed greater improvement in FOME mean scores at 12 weeks (P=0.0334), and also in FOME score change across time (P=0.0283). Patients with severe disability who received nimodipine also showed greater MMSE score change across time (P=0.0495).
                Nimodipine given 7-14 days after cerebral infarction for 3 months results in memory improvement. Nimodipine (BAY e 9736), a new dihydropyridine derivative, has been shown to reduce neurological deficits and mortality induced by acute cerebral ischemia in experimental studies. We investigated the effects of this calcium antagonist in patients with acute ischemic stroke through a randomized, double-blind, parallel-designed trial in which nimodipine was compared with placebo. Forty-one of 54 screened cases were found to fulfil the inclusion criteria (sudden occurrence of a focal neurological deficit secondary to an acute ischemic event in the carotid area diagnosed after a complete neurological work-up) and entered the study. Nineteen of them were treated with nimodipine (40 mg t.i.d. administered for 28 days) and the remaining 22 with placebo, given in identical tablets. In all patients the treatment started within 12 h after the onset of the symptoms. Course and intensity of the neurological deficit were evaluated by the Mathew Scale (slightly modified). Forty patients concluded the trial. Nimodipine was withdrawn in one case following the occurrence of a skin rash whose causative relation with the test drug could not be clarified. Altogether, however, nimodipine was well tolerated and no severe cardiovascular adverse reactions were observed. In terms of efficacy, the scores obtained by the Mathew Scale showed a higher rate of improvement on nimodipine than on placebo, thus indicating that patients receiving the latter drug did not fare as well as those receiving the test medication. Our data suggest that nimodipine may be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. A double-blind, randomized, pilot trial of the calcium channel antagonist PY108-068 was completed in patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Nine treated patients received PY108-068 orally (150 mg/day in divided doses) and 10 control patients received placebo within 48 hours of stroke onset for 21 days. The mean age of the treated patients (four men, five women) was 63.7 years and of the control patients (seven men, three women) 64.4 years. Most infarctions were in the territory of the middle cerebral artery. One treated patient died of sudden cardiac death on Day 12; one control patient died of cerebral herniation. Two treated patients had episodes of clinically insignificant hypotension during Day 1 of treatment. Two control patients had myocardial infarctions during the trial. The mean Toronto Stroke Scale scores at stroke onset were 67 and 90 and at Week 12 were 22.5 and 34.7 in the treated and control groups, respectively. There was parallel improvement in the two groups, with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.12). The mean Barthel Index functional scores at stroke onset were 32.8 and 33 and at Week 12 were 90 and 78.8 in the treated and control groups, respectively. There was a trend in favor of the treated group, but differences between groups did not reach significance. In this pilot trial, PY108-068 was found to be safe but not effective in patients with acute ischemic cerebral infarction. Twenty-six patients with acute supratentorial brain infarction were randomly allocated to double-blind intravenous treatment with the calcium entry blocker flunarizine (12 patients) or placebo (14 patients) within 24 h. CT scan excluded other significant pathology. Impaired consciousness and gaze deviation were more common in the placebo group. Three patients in the treated group (25%) were either dead or severely disabled after 6 months, whereas this occurred in 8 of the 14 (57%) control patients, a difference of 32%. This difference is not statistically significant and there is an uneven distribution of important prognostic variables, however, the confidence limits of the difference (-4% and +68%) suggest that there may be a clinically important effect. 60 patients with acute ischemic stroke were enrolled in a prospective single-blind, randomized trial to determine whether treatment with the calcium antagonist nimodipine would reduce their neurological deficit. All patients received a standard treatment. In addition, 29 received a daily dose of 120 mg nimodipine orally as 3 divided doses (treatment group). Evaluation of therapy was assessed with a neurological scoring system ( Mathew scale). Comparison of the Mathew sum scores in the standard group with those of the nimodipine group (analysis of variance) revealed a highly significant difference (P less than 0.0001) in favour of nimodipine during the 4 week period of treatment. Based on the individual items of the Mathew scale, the level of consciousness and disability were significantly improved under the nimodipine-therapy. Side effects were of minor importance and of no clinical relevance. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that nimodipine would improve the functional outcome in acute ischemic hemispheric stroke.
                A total of 350 patients were randomized to nimodipine 120 mg/d PO or matching placebo for 21 days. Randomization was stratified by onset of therapy, age, and stroke severity. Treatment was begun within 48 hours of onset. The patients had neurological evaluation on admission, on days 1, 7, and 21, and at 3 and 12 months. The primary end points were Rankin grade, neurological score, and mobility at 12 months.
                We did not find any differences in the functional outcome between the treatment groups or between the stratified subgroups. We were also unable in post hoc analyses to find any groups of patients who benefited from nimodipine. During the first month and at 3 months the case-fatality rate was higher in the nimodipine-treated patients than in those on placebo (P = .004 and P = .030, respectively), but at the 1-year follow-up this difference had lost statistical significance. During the first week nimodipine had a statistically significant lowering effect on both systolic (P = .005) and diastolic (P = .013) blood pressure.
                Nimodipine did not improve the functional outcome of acute ischemic hemispheric stroke. The early case-fatality rate was higher in the nimodipine group, possibly due to the blood pressure-lowering effect of nimodipine. Nimodipine is a 1,4-dihydropyridine derivative that shows a preferential cerebrovascular activity in experimental animals. Clinical data suggest that nimodipine has a beneficial effect on the neurologic outcome of patients suffering an acute ischemic stroke. Our double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter trial was designed to assess the effects of oral nimodipine on the mortality rate and neurologic outcome of patients with an acute ischemic stroke. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive either nimodipine tablets (30 mg q.i.d.) or identical placebo tablets for 28 days. Treatment was always started less than or equal to 48 hours after the acute event. The Mathew Scale, slightly modified by Gelmers et al, was used for neurologic assessment. Mortality rate and neurologic outcome after 28 days were used as evaluation criteria. We considered 123 patients to be valid for the analysis of efficacy. Mortality rates did not differ significantly between groups. Neurologic outcome after 28 days of therapy did not differ between groups. However, when only those patients most likely to benefit from any intervention (Mathew Scale sum score of less than or equal to 65 at baseline) were analyzed separately in post hoc-defined subgroups, the nimodipine-treated subgroups showed a significantly better neurologic outcome. This result suggests that some patients with acute ischemic stroke will benefit from treatment with nimodipine tablets. We evaluated the effect of nimodipine (30 mg q.i.d. orally for 14 days) on acute ischemic stroke of mild or moderate severity in a unicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study. Treatment had to be started after CT, within 48 h of infarct in patients with a Mathew scale sum score between 50 and 75. The duration of follow-up was 4 months. Eight of the 60 randomized patients were excluded because of incorrect diagnosis. For the remaining 52 patients, 24 were allocated to nimodipine and 28 to placebo. Analysis of variance and covariance and repeated measurements of the Mathew scale scores showed no difference between the two groups, who had continuous and parallel improvement. There was no recurrent stroke, but 1 control died 4 weeks after stroke. Treatment with nimodipine was well tolerated (hypotension: 1 treated patient, 3 controls; bradycardia: 1 treated patient, 2 controls; sGPT increase: 1 treated patient, 1 control). The lack of efficacy of nimodipine in this study may be due to: (1) the neurologic deficit not being severe enough, or (2) the delay before treatment was too long. A randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial of placebo versus nimodipine was conducted to test the hypothesis that nimodipine would reduce the frequency of death and of worsening by 30% compared with placebo.
                Nimodipine was used in doses of 60 mg, 120 mg, and 240 mg daily in 1,064 patients treated for 21 days. Treatment was begun within 48 hours of stroke due to infarction as inferred by initial computed tomographic scan findings. The Toronto and motor scales were analyzed by analysis of covariance, using covariance-adjusted means, the last-value-carried-forward, to compare the baseline value with the 3 assessment days (days 4, 10, and 21).
                No difference in mortality or neurological outcome was found with any of the rating scales for the overall cohort. Planned but post hoc subgroup analysis showed a reduction in worsening frequency of 30% compared with placebo and significantly better outcome scores with 120 mg nimodipine daily started within 18 hours of stroke as measured by the Toronto scale (p less than 0.005) and when the pretreatment computed tomographic scan was negative (p less than 0.003).
                Nimodipine had no overall effect when treatment was begun within 48 hours. Confirmation of the benefits suggested by post hoc analyses for the subgroup treated with 120 mg nimodipine within 18 hours, and who had negative computed tomographic scans, would require a separate trial. In a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study of 27 patients with acute ischemic stroke, the effect on regional CMRglc (rCMRglc) of the calcium channel blocking agent nimodipine administered in addition to routine treatment was investigated. Following computed tomography-supported diagnosis of focal ischemia in the middle cerebral artery territory, positron emission tomography (PET) of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) was performed, and the patients were entered into the study within 48 h after onset of symptoms, randomly receiving either nimodipine (2 mg/h constant i.v. infusion for 5 days, 120 mg/day orally for another 16 days) or carrier/placebo. FDG PET was repeated after completion of therapy. The clinical course was followed during the treatment period and for 6 months after the stroke, using the Mathew Score for early and the Barthel Index for late assessment. During that observation period, five patients died in the nimodipine group and four in the control group. Subsequently, the code was broken, and the clinical and PET data were analyzed in relation to treatment assignment, with the nimodipine group comprising 11 and the control group 12 eligible cases. The two groups were similar with respect to age and sex distribution, initial clinical deficit, and infarct size and location. While the infarct rCMRglc showed comparable slight increases over time in both groups, the metabolic changes in the other evaluated regions (contralateral infarct mirror region, ipsi- and contralateral cerebral gray matter, contra- and ipsilateral cerebellar hemispheres) differed significantly between treatment groups (side x region x treatment interaction p less than 0.025).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of fasudil, a Rho-kinase inhibitor (RKI), in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke.
                A total of 160 patients, who were able to receive drug treatment within 48 h of acute ischemic stroke onset were enrolled. Patients received either 60 mg fasudil or a placebo (saline) by intravenous injection over 60 min, twice daily for 14 days. The primary end points were neurological status at 2 weeks after the start of treatment, and clinical outcome at 1 month after the onset of symptoms.
                Fasudil treatment resulted in significantly greater improvements in both neurological functions (p=0.0013), and clinical outcome (p=0.0015). There were no serious adverse events reported in the fasudil group. The average trough value (12 h values) of active metabolite hydroxyfasudil, another RKI, in healthy elderly volunteers receiving 60 mg of fasudil was 0.077 microM-a concentration well above that needed to inhibit Rho-kinase (0.025-0.05 microM).
                Treatment with fasudil within 48 h of acute ischemic stroke onset significantly improved the patient's clinical outcome. This study found fasudil to be a useful and safe drug for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Further evaluations, for example, 3-month functional outcomes in a larger clinical trial, may help to define the efficacy of fasudil in acute ischemic stroke.
No evidence is available using calcium antagonists in patients with acute ischemic stroke is effective.