Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for central lung tumors. A prospective, randomized comparison of two fractionation schedules. Combined Nd-YAG laser/HDR brachytherapy versus Nd-YAG laser only in malignant central airway involvement: a prospective randomized study. Does additional brachytherapy improve the effect of external irradiation? A prospective, randomized study in central lung tumors. External irradiation versus external irradiation plus endobronchial brachytherapy in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study. Optimization of dose and fractionation of endobronchial brachytherapy with or without external radiation in the palliative management of non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study.
Remote high dose rate brachytherapy is an effective local treatment modality for central lung tumors and has the potential to improve survival time. Optimal dose and fractionation schemes have not been identified yet. We conducted a prospective randomized study to compare two treatment schedules in terms of survival time, local tumor control, and possible complications.
                Group 1 received 4 brachytherapies with a dose of 3.8 Gy (at a 10-mm depth) on a weekly basis, and group 2 received 2 treatments with 7.2 Gy (at a 10-mm depth) at a 3-week interval. At a depth of 5 mm, the calculated doses would be 8 and 15 Gy. This study is still ongoing. Here we report interim results.
                Ninety-three patients with advanced cancer were included in the study; 44 were in group 1 and 49, in group 2. Both groups were comparable regarding age, sex, tumor stage, Karnofsky performance status, and histologic findings.
                A mean total irradiation dose of 13.4 +/- 5.2 Gy for group 1 and 13.7 +/- 4.4 for group 2 were applied (calculated at 10 mm from the source axis, equivalent to 27.9 Gy in group 1 and 28.5 Gy in group 2 at a 5-mm depth).
                The 1-year survival rate was 11.4% in group 1 and 20.4% in group 2. No significant difference in survival time was found, but mean survival was longer in group 2 (49 weeks) than in group 1 (26 weeks). Local control after 3 months was comparable in both groups. Fatal hemoptysis occurred at a similar rate in group 1 (22.2%) and in group 2 (21.1%).
                High-dose rate brachytherapy with 2 x 7.2 Gy with a 3-week interval is equivalent to a 4 x 3.8-Gy regimen on a weekly basis. The shorter treatment schedule is more convenient for patients, does not cause more side effects, and provides an equal local tumor control. Laser debulking and prosthetic stents are useful modalities in the palliative treatment of initial inoperable or recurrent lung cancer. Recently, endobrochial brachytherapy was introduced to extend the duration of palliation and reduce the number of endoscopic treatments. This trial compares Nd-YAG laser alone and associated to high dose rated (HDR)-brachytherapy.
                From 1995 to 1998, 29 consecutive patients, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and central airway involvement, were randomized in two groups: group 1 (15 patients) received Nd-YAG laser only; group 2 (14 patients) underwent a combined Nd-YAG laser/ HDR brachytherapy treatment.
                There was no mortality or morbidity related to the treatment. The period free from symptoms was 2.8 months for group 1 and increased to 8.5 months in group 2 (P<0.05). The disease's progression free period grew from 2.2 months of group 1 to 7.5 months of group 2 (P<0.05) and the number of further endoscopic treatment reduced from 15 to 3 (P<0.05).
                The results confirm the potential of brachytherapy to prolong relief from symptoms, lessen disease progression and reduce costs of treatment. A detailed analysis is presented of both groups. Endobronchial brachytherapy has become more widely used to increase the total local dose of irradiation ("boost") applied for the treatment of lung cancer. Apart from treatment for local stenosis, endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external irradiation (EI) has the potential to improve local tumor control and perhaps prolong survival, but the real benefit has not been proven yet. To evaluate the possible effects of external irradiation with an additional boost of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, we conducted a prospective randomized study.
                Design-two groups were compared: Group 1 was treated with external radiotherapy alone (planned dose 60 Gy); Group 2 received an additional boost of HDR brachytherapy of scheduled 4.8 Gy each (at 10 mm from the source axis) before and after external irradiation. Patients-98 patients with advanced inoperable lung cancer were included in the study, 42 in Group 1 and 56 in Group 2. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, tumor stage, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and histology.
                A mean total external irradiation dose of 50.5 +/- 14.1 Gy in Group 1 and 50 +/- 12.5 Gy in Group 2 was applied. Group 2 received an additional dose of 7.44 +/- 2.6 Gy (at 10 mm depth) through brachytherapy. The median survival time in both groups was comparable (28 weeks and 27 weeks, respectively). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (68 patients) Group 2 showed an advantage in median survival with borderline significance (40 vs. 33 weeks, p = 0.09). Group 2 showed also a better local tumor control in all patients; patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a significantly longer period of local tumor control. Fatal hemoptysis was the cause of death in 6 (14.2%) patients in Group 1 and 11 (18.9%) in Group 2 (p = 0.53).
                High dose rate brachytherapy in patients with inoperable lung cancer increased local control in our randomized study when used in combination with external irradiation. Survival time was also longer, but with no clear statistical significance. This applied especially to patients with squamous cell carcinomas. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of fatal hemoptysis between the two groups. No randomized studies are available on the additional value of endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) to external irradiation (XRT) regarding palliation of respiratory symptoms (RS). A prospective randomized study was initiated to test the hypothesis that the addition of EBB to XRT provides higher levels of palliation of dyspnea and other RS and improvement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with endobronchial tumour.
                Patients with previously untreated NSCLC, stages I-IIIb, WHO-performance status of 0-3 and with biopsy proven endobronchial tumour in the proximal airways were eligible. EBB consisted of two fractions of 7.5 Gy at 1 cm on day 1 and 8. XRT started at day 2. The XRT dose was 30 Gy (2 weeks) or 60 Gy (6 weeks). The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 were assessed before treatment and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Re-expansion of collapsed lung was tested by the inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) and CT scan of the chest.
                Ninety-five patients were randomized between arm 1 (XRT alone) (n=48) or arm 2 (XRT+EBB) (n=47). The arms were well balanced regarding pre-treatment characteristics and QoL scores. The compliance for QoL-assessment was >90% at all times. No significant difference between the trial arms was observed with respect to response of dyspnea. However, a beneficial effect of EBB was noted concerning the mean scores of dyspnea over time (P=0.02), which lasted for 3 months. This benefit was only observed among patients with an obstructing tumour of the main bronchus. A higher rate of re-expansion of collapsed lung was observed in arm 2 (57%) compared to arm 1 (35%) (P=0.01). The inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) assessed 2 weeks after radiotherapy improved with 493 cm(3) in arm 2 and decreased 50 cm(3) in arm 1 (P=0.03). No difference was noted regarding the incidence of massive haemoptysis (13 vs. 15%).
                The addition of EBB to XRT in NSCLC is safe and provides higher rates of re-expansion of collapsed lung resulting in a transient lower levels of dyspnea. This beneficial effect was only observed among patients with obstructing tumours in the main bronchus. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBBT) is an established modality for the palliation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. We compared three different schedules using EBBT with or without external radiation (XRT) in this setting.
                Forty-five patients were randomized to three treatment arms. Arm A received XRT to a dose of 30 Gy/10 fr/2 weeks and two sessions of EBBT 8 Gy each. Arm B received the same XRT and a single session of EBBT 10 Gy at 1 cm. Arm C received only a single fraction of brachytherapy to a dose of 15 Gy at 1 cm without XRT. Symptomatic response rates, duration of symptom palliation, obstruction scores, quality of life outcomes and complications were assessed and compared.
                The overall symptomatic response rates were 91% for dyspnea, 84% for cough, 94% for hemoptysis and 83% for obstructive pneumonia. There was no significant difference between the arms. The median time to symptom relapse was 4-8 months for all symptoms and the median time to symptom progression was 6-11 months. The results were comparable between groups except for hemoptysis, where a shorter palliation was seen in Arm C that achieved statistical significance (P < 0.01). Quality of life showed significant improvement, with maximum benefit in Arm A. Complication rates were low. Only one patient died of fatal hemoptysis.
                EBBT is thus a safe and effective palliative tool in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, either alone or in conjunction with XRT. The difference between the treatment arms were not statistically significant in most categories, but patients treated with XRT and two endobronchial sessions of 8 Gy had the most consistent benefit in terms of all the parameters studied.
The evidence did not provide conclusive results that EBB plus EBRT improved symptom relief over EBRT alone. We were not able to provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB with EBRT, EBB in preference to EBRT, chemotherapy or Nd-YAG laser. From heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we conclude that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation than EBB alone. For patients previously treated by EBRT who are symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial central obstruction, EBB may be considered in selected cases.