[Comparative efficacy of chloroquine and amodiaquine (25 and 35 mg/kg) in school children infected with P. falciparum (Brazzaville, March 1990)]. Amodiaquine less effective than chloroquine in the treatment of falciparum malaria in the Philippines. In-vivo resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine and amodiaquine in south Cameroon and age-related efficacy of the drugs. Comparative efficacy of alternative primary therapies for Plasmodium falciparum infections in Malawi. In vivo efficacy study of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine in Kibwezi, Kenya and Kigoma, Tanzania. Amodiaquine remains effective for treating uncomplicated malaria in west and central Africa. [Parasitological and clinical response to amodiaquine versus chloroquine in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children in an endemic area]. [Evaluation of efficacy and tolerance of amodiaquine versus chloroquine in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria outbreak in children of Gabon]. Falciparum malaria fully cleared by amodiaquine, pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine-sulfalene in areas of chloroquine resistance in Dodoma, Tanzania. Chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum in the urban region of Yaounde, Cameroon. Part 2: Evaluation of the efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination in the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Yaounde, Cameroon. Evaluation of four therapeutic regimens for falciparum malaria in Mozambique, 1986. [Uncomplicated malaria attack in an area with high chloroquine resistance. 2. Evaluation of first-choice therapeutic scheme]. Gametocytaemia in Senegalese children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria treated with chloroquine, amodiaquine or sulfadoxine + pyrimethamine. Effectiveness of amodiaquine, sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, and combinations of these drugs for treating chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in Hainan Island, China. A randomised controlled trial to assess the relative efficacy of chloroquine, amodiaquine, halofantrine and Fansidar in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria in children. [In vivo and in vitro sensitivity to 4-aminoquinolines of Plasmodium falciparum in Madagascar: results of a study conducted on the east coast (July 1985-July 1986)]. The sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine and amodiaquine in Ibadan, Nigeria. A randomized trial of chloroquine, amodiaquine and pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine in Gambian children with uncomplicated malaria. Effectiveness of amodiaquine as treatment for chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum infections in Kenya. Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in Equatorial Guinea. Parasitological, clinical and haematological response of children with Plasmodium falciparum to 4-aminoquinolines and to pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine with quinine in western Kenya. [Resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to 3 antimalarials in Turbo (Antioquia, Colombia), 1998]. Evaluation of the relative efficacy of various antimalarial drugs in Nigerian children under five years of age suffering from acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Randomized comparison of chloroquine and amodiaquine in the treatment of acute, uncomplicated, Plasmodium falciparum malaria in children. Amodiaquine, sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, and combination therapy for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Kampala, Uganda: a randomised trial. Response of falciparum malaria to chloroquine and three second line antimalarial drugs in a Kenyan coastal school age population.
The efficacy of 4 therapeutic schedules was compared in March and April 1990 in Brazzaville school children, aged between 6 and 8 years, with parasitaemia of at least 1,000 trophozoites of Plasmodium falciparum per mm3. It was possible to interpret 125 simplified in vivo tests. The results showed that the activity of amodiaquine is still relatively satisfactory. The activity of chloroquine was slightly lower with the schedule of 25 mg/kg but was good at 35 mg/kg. Although these results were obtained in children who were mostly asymptomatic, they show that the use of amino-4-quinolines is still justified, at least in the initial treatment of uncomplicated malaria in semi-immune congolese subjects. Amodiaquine was compared to chloroquine in two groups of Filipino patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Every patient received 25 mg/kg of base orally given over three days. In a hospital study, all eight patients receiving chloroquine cleared their parasitemia by day 6, but six of eight patients receiving amodiaquine failed to clear parasitemia and in four patients there was no response at all (RIII resistance); this difference was significant (P less than 0.01). In a village based study, there was initial clearing of parasitemia in each patient. However, recrudescent infection occurred in all five patients receiving amodiaquine (RI resistance). Five of six falciparum infections were sensitive to chloroquine, while parasitemia reappeared in one patient. In this village, resistance to amodiaquine was significantly more common than resistance to chloroquine (P less than 0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first report of amodiaquine being substantially worse than chloroquine in the treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infection. nan In Malawi, where high levels of chloroquine resistance were shown using a modified 7-day in vivo test, amodiaquine and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine were evaluated as alternative initial therapies for Plasmodium falciparum infections in children under 5 years old. Therapy success rates, judged by parasite clearance by day 7 after initiation of therapy, were significantly greater among 39 children treated with amodiaquine at 10 mg/kg (90%), 37 receiving amodiaquine at 25 mg/kg (97%), and 34 receiving pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (100%) at a dose of 25 mg sulfadoxine/kg, than among those treated with chloroquine at a dose of 25 mg/kg (59%) (P = 0.01). Extension of the follow-up period of those receiving amodiaquine (25 mg/kg) and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine to 21 d revealed a progressively increasing rate of parasite recrudescence in the amodiaquine group (34%), but no recrudescence in the pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine group. These results suggest that, in Malawi, amodiaquine and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine are superior to chloroquine in producing prompt clearance of P. falciparum parasites among young children, and that pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine alone is superior to the 4-aminoquinolines in sustaining P. falciparum clearance. We conducted two randomized clinical trials to determine the in vivo efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in treating Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Seventy-five patients under the age of 10 years in Kibwezi, Kenya, and 171 patients in Kigoma, Tanzania, were enrolled for treatment. Due to loss of eight patients in Kibwezi and 37 in Kigoma to follow-up, we used best and worst case scenarios for the parasitological response. The in vivo sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to amodiaquine was 75% (no loss to follow-up) in Kibwezi and ranged from 85% in the best to 65% in the worst case scenario in Kigoma. The sensitivity to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine was 70% to 88% in Kibwezi and 65% to 89% in Kigoma. R1 resistance to amodiaquine was 22% in Kibwezi and varied from 6% in the best to 26% for the worst case scenario in Kigoma. The R1 resistance to sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine was 5% to 23% in Kibwezi and 2% to 26% in Kigoma. R2 resistance was 3% for amodiaquine and 7% for sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in Kibwezi and 9% in Kigoma for each treatment group. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups at either study site, except for a slight difference in R1 resistance in the best case scenario, Kibwezi, in favour of S/P. Although both amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine resistance seems to be increasing, these antimalarials are still effective in parasite clearance. Many countries in Africa are now confronted with the dilemma of shifting drug policies for uncomplicated falciparum malaria from chloroquine, which has become largely ineffective, to a new first-line drug and amodiaquine is one of the possible options. A multicentre, open-label randomized controlled trial of amodiaquine 30 mg/kg vs chloroquine 25 mg/kg over 3 days was performed in Senegal, Cameroon, Gabon, and Burkina Faso between 1996 and 1998 and patients were followed-up for 14 days. Sensitivity of isolates in vitro and whole blood levels of chloroquine and amodiaquine were also measured. The primary efficacy parameter was parasitological clearance on day 14 (parasitological success). The secondary efficacy parameter was absence of signs/symptoms of malaria on day 14 (clinical success). Among the 364 patients randomized and receiving the assigned treatment (chloroquine n = 185, amodiaquine n = 179), 137 and 139, respectively, reached the primary endpoint. Amodiaquine proved significantly more effective than chloroquine. The summary odds ratio (95% CI) was 7.79 (4.54-13.35) for parasitological success, and 6.3 (3.4-11.68) for clinical success. Sensitivity in vitro and chloroquine blood levels were good predictors of chloroquine failure. Amodiaquine remains effective for treating uncomplicated falciparum malaria in areas of West and Central Africa where chloroquine resistance is prevalent. However, measures should be taken to protect the lifespan of amodiaquine where the drug is introduced for use. The therapeutic management of malaria in endemic regions is now hampered not only by the limited number of antimalarial agents, but also by the appearance of chemoresistant plasmodial strains and by the sometimes severe adverse effects related to the use of some of these drugs. Between January and July 1993, 100 patients presenting with symptomatic Plasmodium falciparum malaria were randomised to receive amodiaquine or chloroquine at the dose of 30 mg/kg for 3 days. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two 4-aminoquinolines in the treatment of uncomplicated malaria. The parasite clearance was 4.87 (+/- 0.33) days in the amodiaquine group and 5.55 (+/- 0.31) days in the chloroquine group. All subjects in both groups were afebrile by D7. Cutaneous adverse effects, such as pruritus, were reported with both amodiaquine (3.2%) and chloroquine (6.8%). Amodiaquine was found to be significantly more effective than chloroquine in terms of parasite clearance on D7. The therapeutic failure rate was 0% for amodiaquine versus 16.3% for chloroquine. At a time when chemoresistance of Plasmodium falciparum, especially chloroquine-resistance, has spread to malarial endemic zones, amodiaquine should be very widely indicated in the treatment of simple malaria due to its excellent efficacy and good safety. We conducted a prospective study from September 1997 to January 1998 in Libreville (Gabon). Fifty-three (53) children with uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria were included and divided into two groups. The first group (27 patients) was treated with amodiaquine and the second (26 patients) with chloroquine. The efficacy and tolerance of amodiaquine 30 mg/kg base over 3 days (10 mg/kg daily) and chloroquine 25 mg/kg base over 3 days (10 mg/kg day 0, 10 mg/kg day 1, 5 mg/kg day 3) were estimated at days 7 and 14. Clinical examination and parasitaemia were assessed on days 0, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14. Haematological and biochemical parameters were determined on days 0 and 7. Amodiaquine was shown to be more effective than chloroquine in clinical response and ridding patients of parasites: adequate clinical response was significantly higher with amodiaquine than chloroquine [100% (27/27) versus 45% (9/20), p < 0.0005]. Rates for early treatment failure (ETF) and late treatment failure (LTF) were respectively 35% and 12% with chloroquine. The parasitological success rate was significantly higher with amodiaquine than chloroquine on days 7 [93% (25/27) versus 62% (13/21), p < 0.008] and 14 [100% (13/13) versus 44% (4/9), p < 0.01]. The RI resistance type was 7% in the amodiaquine group. The rate of in vivo chloroquino-resistance was 53%, essentially of RII and RIII type. Overall, the two drugs were well tolerated. The in vivo response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine, amodiaquine, pyrimethamine-sulfalene (MetakelfinR) and pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine (FansidarR) was assessed in Dodoma in 1988. Asymptomatic schoolchildren with pure P. falciparum infection were given full curative doses of one of the above antimalarials. Daily parasitological follow-ups were made for seven days. Overall successful follow-up cases were 101, 108, 95 and 97 on chloroquine, amodiaquine, MetakelfinR and FansidarR respectively. The overall resistance rate in the area was 28%. Most of the resistant cases were RII type. There was only one case of MetakelfinR resistance. Amodiaquine and FansidarR were fully effective in eliminating asexual parasitaemia from the blood in all the cases during the seven days of follow-up. The results indicate that chloroquine, a commonly used antimalarial in Tanzania, is not as effective as amodiaquine, a less used drug. Although the 'antifols' are still highly effective in Tanzania, their potency could change with continued use. These drugs should, therefore, be protected and used judiciously. The spread of chloroquine resistance or its stabilization at a high level calls for a change in the therapeutic strategy, including a possible replacement of chloroquine. We assessed and compared the efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine in Yaoundé. Of 140 adults and children > 5 years enrolled in the study, 59 in the amodiaquine and 58 in the sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine treatment group were followed until day 14. The efficacy of amodiaquine was 100%, whereas 12.1% of the patients treated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine responded with an early treatment failure. Side effects in both treatment groups were mild and did not require any specific treatment. We did in vitro drug assays for monodesethylamodiaquine (active metabolite of amodiaquine) and pyrimethamine and measured plasma levels of monodesethylamodiaquine, sulfadoxine, and pyrimethamine. Unlike amodiaquine, the results of the in vitro drug sensitivity test for pyrimethamine were not concordant with the clinical response. A wide inter-individual variation in the plasma drug levels was observed. Unlike chloroquine, the mean plasma concentrations did not vary with age. There was no significant difference in the plasma concentrations of sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine between patients responding with an adequate clinical response and those responding with treatment failure. Amodiaquine has several advantages over sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine combination and may be considered to be an effective drug in an endemic zone with a moderate level of chloroquine resistance. A randomized study on the effect of the following four treatment regimens on Plasmodium falciparum parasitaemia was carried out on 200 asymptomatic schoolchildren in Maputo, Mozambique: chloroquine (25 mg/kg body weight), amodiaquine (25 mg/kg), sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg), or amodiaquine (25 mg/kg) + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg and 1.25 mg/kg) administered on the third day of the study. The results of in vivo tests indicated that 94% of the infections were resistant to chloroquine, 76% to amodiaquine, and 16% to sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. The cure rate with amodiaquine + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine was 100%, which was not significantly different from that with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone; the latter regimen was the most rapidly acting of the treatments studied. It is concluded that amodiaquine is not an appropriate substitute for chloroquine, but that the effect of the combination amodiaquine + sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine may be superior to that of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone, although this requires further study. The authors evaluate the comparative efficiency of chloroquine and amodiaquine (35 mg/kg during 3 days) for uncomplicated malaria treatment in an area with high chemoresistance level. 236 patients with malaria were examined and treated. 38% of them previously used antimalarials. The increase dosage in comparison with the WHO recommendations (25 mg/kg), lead to no advantages for chloroquine treatment (50% failure), in contrast with amodiaquine (4% failure). Therefore amodiaquine might be preferred in the health field unit for uncomplicated malaria. Plasmodium falciparum gametocytaemia was studied in 266 Senegalese children (median 4 years, range 0.5-16) with uncomplicated malaria treated with chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AQ) or sulfadoxine + pyrimethamine (SP). The proportion of resistant infections in vivo to these drugs was 44%, 16% and 7%, respectively. Gametocytes were counted by microscopy in thick smears on days 0, 4, 7 and 14 after treatment. There was a peak of gametocytaemia one week after treatment; on days 0, 7 and 14 the gametocyte prevalences were 35%, 73% and 63%, and the geometric means of gametocyte densities were 1.3, 12.5 and 5.6/microliter of blood. Three factors were found to influence gametocytaemia: treatment, efficacy of treatment, and duration of symptoms before treatment. Gametocyte prevalence and density significantly appeared higher in children treated with SP than with CQ, and higher with CQ than with AQ. Gametocyte prevalence and density were higher in resistant than in sensitive infections. The period between the appearance of the first clinical symptoms and treatment was positively and significantly linked to gametocyte prevalence and density on days 0 and 4. Early treatment with AQ, against sensitive infection, was followed by the lowest gametocytaemia. By contrast, treatment with SP against resistant infection was followed by the highest gametocytaemia. No clear relationship was observed between the density of asexual stages on day 0 and the gametocytaemia at any day between days 0 and 14. The epidemiological significance of post-therapeutic gametocytaemia and its possible role in the spread of resistant parasites are underlined. Solutions are proposed in order to avoid or reduce this gametocytaemia. The study was carried out in 1985-86 in Hainan Island where Plasmodium falciparum is resistant to chloroquine. Fifty cases of falciparum malaria were treated with 1800 mg amodiaquine for 3 days: the cure rate was 65.3%, and the mean time to clear fever and asexual parasitaemia was 30.7 and 60.3 hours, respectively; 34.7% of cases showed RI or RII recrudescence, and one patient's temperature did not come down to normal within 7 days.Twenty-one cases were treated with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (1500 mg and 75 mg, respectively): 19 were cured, I showed RI and another had an S or RI response; the mean time for fever control was 56.1 hours.Fifty cases were treated with amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine and 49 received amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine: the cure rate was 97.9% and 100%, respectively; the mean time for fever clearance was 25.0 and 25.7 hours and for parasite clearance 57.1 and 52.8 hours, respectively. These drug combinations gave much better results for cure and for symptom control than amodiaquine or sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine alone, and may be considered for treatment of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria. A randomised controlled trial was carried out to determine the relative efficacy of four commonly used antimalarial drugs in children aged three to twelve years presenting with uncomplicated malaria at the Eldoret District Hospital, Kenya. One hundred and eighty eight children were studied between July 1993 and July 1994. There were no significant baseline differences between treatment groups with respect to age, sex, weight, ethnicity, haemoglobin, white blood cell (WBC) counts, parasite counts, previous exposure to malaria and prior treatment. Of the 188 patients, eleven were lost to follow-up while twelve were discontinued from the study due to poor clinical response. Most of the latter (eight out of twelve) were in the chloroquine group. By day seven, there were significant differences (p = 0.004) in parasite clearance between groups. There were no significant statistical differences between the groups (p = 0.12) with regard to the fever clearance time. However, there was a significant statistical difference (p = 0.00003) between the treatment groups in the cure rates. Halofantrine was the most efficacious drug with 82% of the cases cured followed by fansidar(R)(62%), amodiaquine (55%) and chloroquine (29%). RI and RII resistance were observed in all the treatment groups, i.e. halofantrine (18%), fansidar (38%), amodiaquine (45%) and chloroquine (67%) while RIII resistance was only observed in the chloroquine group(3%). nan An extended in vivo test of the sensitivity of Plasmodium falciparum to antimalarial drugs in Nigerian children showed no evidence of resistance to chloroquine and amodiaquine. However, the results of a small number of in vitro tests suggest a decreased sensitivity of the parasite to chloroquine when compared with the results of earlier studies in the same locality. The increasing occurrence of chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa makes it essential to reconsider current recommendations for the treatment of uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria. In an open, randomized trial, we have compared chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AQ), and pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine (PS) in rural Gambian children with uncomplicated P.falciparum malaria. Three hundred children were randomly assigned at the time of consultation (Do) to oral treatment with 25 mg/kg CQ, 25 mg/kg AQ (both given over 3 days), or 1.25/25 mg/kg PS. They were reviewed on day 7 (D7) and day 28 (D28) for symptoms, malaria parasitaemia, and packed cell volume (PCV). Significantly more children treated with PS compared to CQ (17 vs 7%, P = 0.03) or AQ (17 vs 3%, P = 0.001) returned with clinical complaints during the first 3 days after treatment. Five of these patients had a generalized convulsion (1 from the AQ group, 4 from the PS group), of whom 4 developed cerebral malaria. At D7, significantly more patients treated with CQ compared to AQ (25 vs 7%, P = 0.0009) or PS (25 vs 4%, P = 0.0001) were parasitaemic. By D28, the cumulative number of parasitological failures was significantly higher in the CQ group compared to the AQ group (65 vs 35%, P = 0.0001), and significantly higher in the AQ group compared to the PS group (35 vs 14%, P = 0.001). Overall, 91% of parasitological failures observed during the study period were symptomatic and were consequently treated with an alternative antimalarial drug. Over the 28-day study period the mean PCV increased significantly less in the CQ group than in the PS group (1.2 vs 3.8%, P = 0.016) and was lower in the CQ group than in the AQ group (1.2 vs 2.7%, P = 0.12, not significant). These results suggest that PS acts more slowly than 4-aminoquinolines in controlling the clinical features of malaria, and that AQ can be considered as an interim alternative to CQ in the first-line therapy of uncomplicated malaria in African areas of high CQ resistance. Studies were conducted in Malindi, Kenya, to assess the response of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine and amodiaquine in vivo (by an extended 14-day test) and in vitro (with the Rieckmann micro test). In-vivo resistance was demonstrated in 19 of 69 (28%) infections treated with chloroquine, but in only 2 of 60 (3.3%) of those treated with amodiaquine (p less than 0.001). In-vitro resistance to chloroquine was demonstrated in 15 of 23 (65%) tests. In contrast, 22 of the same 23 isolates were sensitive to amodiaquine in vitro. Effective concentrations by probit analysis for 50% and 99% (EC50 and EC99) inhibition, respectively, were 180.7 and 4319.6 nmol/l for chloroquine and 12.2 and 147.0 nmol/l for amodiaquine. The results suggest that amodiaquine is effective for the treatment of chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria in Kenya. One hundred and sixty-six children from Equatorial Guinea, all under 10 years of age and with acute uncomplicated falciparum malaria, were randomly allocated to four groups and treated with one of the following regimens: chloroquine or amodiaquine (25 mg base/kg body weight over 3 days), quinine (8 mg/kg every 8 h for 3 or 5 days), and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (25-1.25 mg/kg, in one dose). The parasite clearance rates up to day 14 were 28% with chloroquine, 74% with amodiaquine, and 95% with quinine or sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine. The times required to clear asexual blood forms of Plasmodium falciparum in sensitive cases were 64, 70, 73 and 65 h, respectively. Although quinine and sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine are equally effective, quinine is recommended for treatment of multidrug-resistant malaria in paediatric patients, essentially because of the risk of serious reactions to sulpha drugs. Health providers are, however, encouraged to keep supplies of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine as an option and to refer patients quickly, if required. Children with Plasmodium falciparum infections in Western Province, Kenya, were studied in 1987 for their parasitological, clinical and haematological response to chloroquine, to amodiaquine and to pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine plus quinine. Ninety-eight children under 5 years of age were treated in 1 of 2 hospitals. Of the 56 patients treated with chloroquine base 25 mg/kg, 91% had resistant infections, with 36% having no significant decrease in parasitaemia (RIII resistance); however, 69% responded clinically within a week. Of the 27 patients treated with amodiaquine base 25 mg/kg, 67% had resistant infections, with 7% RIII resistant; 81% responded clinically. The parasites cleared in all 15 children given pyrimethamine-sulfadoxine plus 3 days of quinine. Only when parasites cleared did patients have improved haemoglobins and haematocrits. This study shows that parasitaemia in children hospitalized in western Kenya responds poorly to 4-aminoquinolines, although the patients improve clinically, at least during the first 7 days. Young children may need to clear parasites to avoid the risk of severe anemia and the need for blood transfusions. In 1998 we determined in vivo and in vitro the frequency and the degree of resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to the three antimalarials (chloroquine, amodiaquine, and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine) most utilized in the municipality of Turbo (in the area of Urabá, Antioquia, Colombia), in a sample representative of the population with malaria. We carried out clinical and parasitological analyses over a 14-day period using the standard test recommended by the World Health Organization. In vivo, P. falciparum showed resistance to chloroquine, amodiaquine, and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, with a frequency of 97%, 7%, and 13%, respectively. In vitro, the corresponding figures were 21%, 23%, and 9%, respectively. For chloroquine the level of agreement between the in vivo and in vitro results was 23%. A parallel group-randomized comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of chloroquine (CQ), amodiaquine (AM), quinine (QN), sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (S-P), mefloquine 15 mg kg-1 (M15) and mefloquine 25 mg kg-1 (M25) in acute symptomatic uncomplicated falciparum malaria was carried out in 325 children under the age of five years in Ibadan, southwestern Nigeria, using the 28-day in vivo test. The parasitological cure rate, assessed only up to day 14, was 85% in the CQ group and 100% in the other groups. The mean parasite and fever clearance times were, respectively, 2.64 and 1.20 days in the CQ-sensitive subgroup, 2.32 and 1.13 days in the AM group, 2.27 and 1.17 days in the QN group, 2.23 and 1.76 days in the S-P group, 2.13 and 1.10 days in the M15 group, and 2.07 and 1.09 days in the M25 group. The CQ-treatment failures (seven of 46 patients) were successfully treated with 25 mg kg-1 mefloquine, with parasite and fever clearance times of 1.73 and 1.0 days respectively. The study shows that, in Nigeria, CQ is now less effective than AM, S-P, QN and M in acute falciparum malaria in the group most vulnerable to the infection (the under-five-year-olds).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The increasing resistance of Plasmodium falciparum to chloroquine (CQ) has created an urgent need for the evaluation of alternative, effective, safe, cheap, readily available and affordable antimalarial treatments. In the present study, the efficacy of amodiaquine (AQ) in the treatment of acute, symptomatic, uncomplicated, P. falciparum malaria was compared with that of CQ, each drug being given at 10 mg/kg per day for 3 days (days 0, 1 and 2). The 210 subjects (104 given AQ and 106 CQ) were Nigerian children aged 5 months-12 years. Fever-clearance times (FCT), parasite densities on days 1-4 and parasite-clearance times (PCT) were all significantly lower with AQ than with CQ. Mean (S.D.) PCT, for example, were 2.6 (0.8) days with AQ and 3.0 (1.0) days with CQ (P = 0.001). The cure rates obtained on days 14, 21 and 28 - 98.1% v. 79.3% (P =0.000), 97.1% v. 64.2% (P = 0.00001) and 95.2% v. 58.5% (P = 0.0000000) with AQ and CQ, respectively - were all also significantly higher with AQ. All but two of the 20 subjects who were considered CQ-treatment failures by day 14 (i.e. two RIII, two RII and 16 RI) responded to subsequent treatment with AQ, with PCT (but not FCT) significantly shorter than during their initial treatment with CQ. In siblings in whom there was clustering of infections, the cure rates were 100% with AQ (N =12) and 63.6% with CQ (N = 11; P = 0.03). Adverse reactions to CQ and AQ were similar and tolerable: pruritus in 10 and 11 children in the AQ and CQ groups, respectively, and gastro-intestinal disturbances which occurred in three children from each group. Haematological parameters were not adversely affected by either drug. At least in the setting of the present study, AQ appears more effective than CQ, effective against CQ-resistant infections, and well tolerated by children with acute, uncomplicated, P. falciparum malaria. It may therefore be useful as an alternative to CQ in areas of CQ resistance. Increasing Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine in sub-Saharan Africa necessitates use of alternative antimalarial agents. Affordable alternative treatments include sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine and amodiaquine. Combination of antimalarial agents can increase therapeutic efficacy and delay emergence of drug resistance. We compared the efficacy of sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and an amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine combination for treatment of uncomplicated malaria in a region of high chloroquine resistance.
                Patients with symptoms of uncomplicated falciparum malaria and confirmed disease in Kampala, Uganda, were randomly assigned to receive sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (25 mg/kg sulfadoxine, and 1.25 mg/kg pyrimethamine) plus placebo; amodiaquine (25 mg/kg) plus placebo; or amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. Patients were followed up for 14 days, and clinical and parasitological outcomes were assessed.
                90% (400/445) of patients enrolled in the study successfully completed 14 days of follow-up. Treatment failure based on clinical criteria occurred in 13 of 131 (10%) patients on sulfadoxine/ pyrimethamine, nine of 131 (7%) on amodiaquine, and four of 138 (3%) on amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine. Based on parasitological criteria, treatment failed in 26%, 16%, and 10% of these patients, respectively. Amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine was significantly more effective than sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine alone in children aged younger than 5 years (clinical failure in 3.5% vs 13.9%, respectively, risk difference 10.4% [95% CI, 1.6-19.3] p=0.021; parasitological failure in 12.8% vs 26.4%, risk difference 13.6% [1.2-26.0] p=0.041).
                Sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, amodiaquine, and amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine were all effective for treatment of uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Uganda. The amodiaquine/sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine combination was the most effective, and could be the optimum low-cost alternative to chloroquine in Africa. Ambulatory rural school children in the Mombasa area with P. falciparum parasitaemia were examined and randomly assigned to treatment with one of three second-line antimalarials--amodiaquine, pyrimethamine/sulphadoxine (P/SD) and pyrimethamine/sulfalene (P/SL). Clinical signs and parasitaemia were followed daily for the first week and on days 14 and 28. WHO Mark II schizont inhibition tests were performed for all the above 3 drugs and chloroquine. The total number of cases was 73. The mean parasite density was 142.1 +/- 207; 102.7 +/- 166; 82.74 +/- 93 parasites per 300 WBC for amodiaquine, P/SD, and P/SL, respectively. In vitro tests showed a chloroquine resistance rate of 60% and no resistance to all of the second line drugs. Also, all children treated successfully cleared their parasitaemia with mean clearance rates of 2.05 +/- 0.57; 1.86 +/- 0.47; 2.05 +/- 0.50 days for amodiaquine, P/SD and P/SL, respectively. Even though, no difference in the effectiveness between the second line drugs used was found, reinfection rates as depicted by day 28 parasitaemia differed--amodiaquine 16%; P/SD 0%; and P/SL4.35%. This difference could be attributed to the difference in the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs.
There is evidence to support the continued use of amodiaquine to treat uncomplicated malaria, although local drug resistance patterns need to be considered. Monitoring for adverse events should continue.

This review summarizes trials up to 2003. For the reasons in the 'What's new' section, this review will no longer be updated.