Effects of the flutter device on pulmonary function studies among pediatric cystic fibrosis patients. Comparison of expectorated sputum after manual chest physical therapy and high-frequency chest compression. Short-term effects of three chest physiotherapy regimens in patients hospitalized for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis: a cross-over randomized study. [Evaluation of autodrainage methods in a selected group of cystic fibrosis patients with home environment factors taken into consideration]. [Evaluation of the efficiency of selected thoracic physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of patients with cystic fibrosis]. Comparison of effects of an intrapulmonary percussive ventilator to standard aerosol and chest physiotherapy in treatment of cystic fibrosis. [Long-term evaluation of effectiveness for selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of cystic fibrosis]. Comparison of the flutter device to standard chest physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis: a pilot study. Physiologic evidence for high-frequency chest wall oscillation and positive expiratory pressure breathing in hospitalized subjects with cystic fibrosis. A comparison of the therapeutic effectiveness of and preference for postural drainage and percussion, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation, and high-frequency chest wall compression in hospitalized cystic fibrosis patients. Sputum rheology changes in cystic fibrosis lung disease following two different types of physiotherapy: flutter vs autogenic drainage. Effects of flutter and PEP mask physiotherapy on symptoms and lung function in children with cystic fibrosis. Short-term comparative study of high frequency chest wall oscillation and European airway clearance techniques in patients with cystic fibrosis. A comparison of bronchial drainage treatments in cystic fibrosis. Long-term comparative trial of positive expiratory pressure versus oscillating positive expiratory pressure (flutter) physiotherapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis. High-frequency chest compression system to aid in clearance of mucus from the lung. Comparison of high-frequency chest wall oscillation and oscillating positive expiratory pressure in the home management of cystic fibrosis: a pilot study. The Flutter VRP1 as an adjunct to chest physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis. Comparison of Flutter device and chest physical therapy in the treatment of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation. Comparison of high frequency chest compression and conventional chest physiotherapy in hospitalized patients with cystic fibrosis. Comparison of active cycle of breathing and high-frequency oscillation jacket in children with cystic fibrosis.
Previous studies have shown that the Scandipharm Flutter airway clearance device has increased the ability of cystic fibrosis patients to expectorate mucus. Studies that show the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function among the pediatric cystic fibrosis patients are limited. Thus, we embarked on a study to assess the device's effectiveness.
                The long-term effect of the Flutter on pulmonary function tests (PFTs) was studied and compared with other airway clearance techniques, such as chest physiotherapy (CPT) and Vital Signs, Inc. 9000 PEP positive expiratory pressure (PEP) therapy for cystic fibrosis patients of five to 17 years of age with mild to moderate disease. Of the 15 patients who qualified, six completed the study. The patients were evaluated using PFTs and a respiratory assessment at the beginning and end of each new therapy. Duration of each therapy was one month.
                No respiratory assessment parameters changed between the therapies studied. All patients who used the Flutter preferred it over the other two therapies. The patients stated they felt better clinically, were able to expectorate mucus more easily, and felt more in control of their therapies. Paired t-test statistical analysis from the PFT data indicated no significant changes in forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1), forced expiratory flow from 25 percent to 75 percent of the loop (FEF25-75), airway resistance (Raw), or specific airway conductance (sGaw) among the three therapies studied.
                This study has shown no significant change in respiratory assessment parameters or pulmonary function. Further studies involving multicenter trials are warranted to evaluate the effects of the Flutter on pulmonary function. This study is a quantitative comparison of the sputum produced by 12 subjects with cystic fibrosis (CF) who received high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) and standard chest physical therapy (CPT) in randomized order. Six subjects routinely used manual CPT and six routinely used the HFCC. None had acute infections or hospitalization in the six weeks before the study. Two certified respiratory therapists alternated subjects and CPT vs HFCC order during the two weeks of the matched study. For all sessions, the expectorated sputum was collected in preweighed cups, which were reweighed immediately after collection and again after evaporation to dryness. The wet and dry weights of the sputum produced as a result of the two techniques were significantly different, with HFCC having greater weight. Regardless of the mode of therapy, the sputum produced by the subjects who regularly received HFCC had greater water content than did the sputum produced by those subjects who regularly received CPT. No significant difference was found between the two therapists regarding sputum expectorated by the subjects during CPT. These results show that sputum production by subjects with CF who receive CPT by certified respiratory therapists can be as great as the sputum produced by the same subjects who receive HFCC. The results also suggest that unknown factors attributed to the therapists may produce different levels of effort from time to time that may decrease the respiratory therapists' effectiveness, whereas the HFCC therapy may be more consistently effective because it is entirely machine based. The aim of our study was to compare the short-term efficacy of three different chest physiotherapy (CPT) regimens (PD, postural drainage; PEP, positive expiratory pressure physiotherapy; HFCC, high-frequency chest compression physiotherapy) on patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) hospitalized for an acute pulmonary exacerbation. Sixteen patients with CF, 8 males, 8 females, aged 15-27 years (mean, 20.3 +/- 4), met the inclusion criteria: 1) age over 14 years; 2) mild or moderate airway obstruction; 3) sputum volume > 30 mL/day; 4) being proficient in PD and PEP CPT. Patients at admission had (mean +/- SD) forced volume in 1 second (FEV1) 52.2 +/- 21.9 percent predicted; Shwachman-Kulczycki clinical score 65.1 +/- 11 points; Chrispin-Norman chest radiography score 18.6 +/- 4.3 points. The three CPT regimens and a control-treatment (CONT) were administered in a random sequence, each patient receiving each treatment twice a day (in 50 minute sessions) for 2 consecutive days. During CONT and for 30 minutes after each session only spontaneous coughing was allowed. Wet and dry weight of sputum were recorded during the 50-minute sessions and 30 minutes afterward. Lung function was measured before and 30 minutes after each session. For each treatment a score was given by the patient for efficacy, and by both the patient and the physiotherapist for tolerance. Wet and dry weights of sputum collected during the sessions were greater for all CPT regimens than for CONT (P < 0.001, P < 0.0001). No significant differences between the three CPT regimens for both wet and dry weights were found when the number of coughs was taken into account.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The aim of the study was an estimation of effectiveness of selected autodrainage methods used in the treatment of children with cystic fibrosis and an assessment of patients' preference in relation to investigated methods. We also estimated the patients and their families' relation to chest physiotherapy methods, which have been used at home for many years. We studied 17 patients, aged 10-18 (x 13.35), who were hospitalised in the Institute of Mother and Child Paediatric Clinical Dept. We compared four autodrainage methods: 1- force expiratory technique, 2- Flutter(R), 3- Flutter (R) with relaxation, 4- PEP system. Every investigated drainage methods were tested by each patient according to a determined procedure. The following indices were measured: weight of coughed up sputum, oxygen saturation (SaO2) before, during and after drainage, peak expiratory flaw (PEF) before and after drainage. Patients' relation to autodrainage methods was estimated on the ground of their subjective assessment in 0-5-point scale. The results showed that the force expiration technique and the Flutter(R) with relaxation are the most efficient autodrainage methods determined by their coughed up sputum weight. Patients using these methods coughed up x 1.36g and x 1.319 g sputum. Using Flutter(R) without relaxation, patients expectorated 1.199 g sputum. PEP system turned out the least effective. Patients using the PEP system coughed up x 0.87 g sputum. In comparison, patients using postural drainage with clapping expectorated x 0.63g sputum. We observed that the PEF decreased during every investigated drainage methods. There were no significant differences in SaO2 values before and after drainage. Concerning the patients' preference in relation to the investigated methods, patients appreciated the most force expiratory technique (68 points). The least appreciated was the PEP system (33 points). For comparison, postural drainage with clapping has been estimated at 48.87 points. In Poland the standard treatment of pulmonary manifestation of cystic fibrosis consists of physiotherapy techniques of postural drainage with clapping. However many studies demonstrated that various alternative airway clearance techniques performed in Europe the last few years have been more effective than postural drainage. The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of the efficiency of selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of children with cystic fibrosis. We studied 21 patients, aged 5-18 (x 10.57), who were hospitalised in the Paediatric Clinic of National Research Institute of Mother and Child in Warsaw, Poland. We compared five chest physiotherapy techniques: 1 - postural drainage with clapping, 2 - postural drainage with clapping and vibration, 3 - active cycle of breathing technique, 4 - Flutter(R), 5 - Flutter(R) with relaxation. Every investigated drainage method was tested by each patient according to a determined procedure. The following indices were measured: weight of coughed up sputum, oxygen saturation (SaO2) before, during and after drainage, peak expiratory flaw (PEF) before and after drainage. The biggest quantity of sputum determined by its coughed up weight was with active cycle of breathing technique (x 2.126 g). In comparison, in patients using postural drainage with clapping and clapping with vibration average sputum expectoration was 0.895 and 1.012 g. Flutter device is recommended for individual usage. Our findings demonstrate that the Flutter with relaxation effectively facilitates removal of mucus from airways (Flutter - x 1.48 g, Flutter with relaxation - x 2.012 g). We observed PEF decrease (p > 0.05) during postural drainage with clapping and vibration. There were no significant differences in SaO2 between the values before and after drainage in every investigated technique. Impaired mucociliary clearance due to defective ion and water transport and the effects of chronic airway infections lead to stasis of secretions and progressive pulmonary damage in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Methods to improve removal of tenacious lung secretions in CF patients contribute to slowing the decline in respiratory function. We have evaluated an intrapulmonary percussive ventilator (IPV), which is a device designed to enhance airway clearance and preserve lung function. A previous pilot study by us had determined that the device was acceptable to patients and is safe. We undertook a 6 month parallel comparative trial of the IPV versus standard, manual chest physiotherapy in 16 CF children and adults. No significant differences in spirometric measures, numbers of hospitalizations, use of oral or IV antibiotics, or anthropometric measurements were detected between the standard aerosol/chest physiotherapy group and the IPV group over the duration of the trial. Patient acceptance, as determined by participant survey, was good. The device appeared to be safe and durable. It was concluded that the IPV is as effective as standard aerosol and chest physiotherapy in preserving lung function and anthropometric measures, and there was no difference in the use of antibiotics and hospitalizations. The aim of this study was a long-term analysis of efficiency of selected chest physiotherapy methods used in the treatment of children with CF. We studied 80 CF children (39 male, 41 female), mean age ll.44yrs (range 6-18 yrs), with varying degree of severity. The study was carried out during 7 months. The subjects were assigned into four groups. Group had conventional postural drainage with clapping (33 patients, age x-11.12), group II- conventional postural drainage with clapping and vibration (16 patients, age x-11.25), group III - active cycle of breathing technique (18 patients, age x-10.5), group IV Flutter (13 patients, age x- 13.77). All patients had three physiotherapy sessions a day. We measured: FEV1 FVC, FEV1/FVC, MEF 25-7 %, PEF, before and after the study. In the group with postural drainage with clapping we observed statistically significant decrease of all studied parameters. The use of additional vibration improved FVC and FEV1/FVC values but the improvement was not statistically significant. FEV1, PEF and MEF 25 %, were significantly lower. Statistically significant increase of all studied parameters was observed in patients using ACBT. In the Flutter group we observed increase of FEV1 and FVC values. The other parameters were decreased without statistical significance. Analysis of variance of pulmonary function parameters between groups demonstrated significant differences in FEV1, PEF and MEF 50% between postural drainage with vibration and active cycle of breathing technique. Significant differences have also been shown in PEF between postural drainage with clapping and active cycle of breathing technique. We conclude that: 1) postural drainage with clapping is less effective compared with the other studied techniques.2) The use of additional vibration did not bring about improvement of drainage efficiency. Vibration increased airways resistance. 3) Flatter device may be less effective in peripheral airways clearance. A preliminary study comparing the efficacy and safety of the flutter device (Flutter) to standard, manual chest physiotherapy (CPT) in hospitalized cystic fibrosis (CF) patients undergoing an acute pulmonary exacerbation.
                Open label, comparative trial with alternate assignment.
                Community and childrens' hospital acute-care wards.
                Twenty-two CF patients (ages 8 to 44 years) undergoing a total of 33 hospitalizations for acute pulmonary exacerbation.
                Complete pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were done at baseline (admission), weekly, and upon discharge from the hospital. Clinical score (CS) was determined at the time of hospital admission and at discharge. Participants were assigned to receive supervised Flutter therapy or standard, manual CPT four times per day during the hospitalization. Patients were monitored for complications, including hemoptysis, hypoxemia, and pneumothorax.
                The groups (CPT and Flutter) did not differ at baseline in demographics or Shwachman score, nor was length of hospitalization different. Significant improvements were noted from admission to discharge in CS and PFT results within each group. Mean percent change in CS and PFT results between CPT and Flutter groups showed no significant difference from hospital admission to discharge. Subsequent power analysis using the observed difference in percent change from admission to discharge for FEV1 indicated that to attain 80% power at alpha = 0.05, a sample of 219 subjects in each group would be necessary.
                Comparative trials of airway clearance techniques with sufficient sample size are lacking. Although the Flutter appears to be a useful device for independent, cost-effective, and safe administration of CPT in this pilot study, a much larger clinical trial would be necessary to make definitive conclusions. This investigation identified ventilation distribution, gas mixing, lung function, and arterial blood oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) physiologic responses to 2 independent airway clearance treatments, high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) and low positive expiratory pressure (PEP) breathing, for subjects who had cystic fibrosis (CF) and who were hospitalized during acute and subacute phases of a pulmonary exacerbation.
                Fifteen subjects with moderate to severe CF were included in this study.
                Subjects performed single-breath inert gas tests and spirometry before and immediately after HFCWO and PEP breathing at admission and discharge. Arterial blood oxyhemoglobin saturation was monitored throughout each treatment.
                At admission and discharge, PEP breathing increased SpO2 during treatment, whereas HFCWO decreased SpO2 during treatment. Ventilation distribution, gas mixing, and lung function improved after HFCWO or PEP breathing.
                High-frequency chest wall oscillation and PEP breathing are similarly efficacious in improving ventilation distribution, gas mixing, and pulmonary function in hospitalized people with CF. Because SpO2 decreases during HFCWO, people who have moderate to severe CF and who use HFCWO should have SpO2 monitored during an acute exacerbation. Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients have abnormally viscid bronchial secretions that cause airway obstruction, inflammation, and infection that leads to lung damage. To enhance airway clearance and reduce airway obstruction, daily bronchopulmonary hygiene therapy is considered essential.
                Compare the effectiveness of and patient preferences regarding 3 airway clearance methods: postural drainage and percussion (PD&P), intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV), and high-frequency chest wall compression (HFCWC).
                The participants were hospitalized CF patients >or= 12 years old. Effectiveness was evaluated by measuring the wet and dry weights of sputum obtained with each method. In random order, each patient received 2 consecutive days of each therapy, delivered 3 times daily for 30 minutes. Sputum was collected during and for 15 minutes after each treatment, weighed wet, then dried and weighed again. Participants rated their preferences using a Likert-type scale. Mean weights and preferences were compared using analysis of variance with repeated measures. Patient preferences were compared using Freidman's test.
                Twenty-four patients were studied. The mean +/- SD wet sputum weights were 5.53 +/- 5.69 g with PD&P, 6.84 +/- 5.41 g with IPV, and 4.77 +/- 3.29 g with HFCWC. The mean wet sputum weights differed significantly (p = 0.035). Wet sputum weights from IPV were significantly greater than those from HFCWC (p < 0.05). The mean dry sputum weights were not significantly different. With regard to overall preference and to the subcomponents of preference, none of the 3 methods was preferred over the others.
                HFCWC and IPV are at least as effective as vigorous, professionally administered PD&P for hospitalized CF patients, and the 3 modalities were equally acceptable to them. A hospitalized CF patient should try each therapy and choose his or her preferred modality. The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of two frequently used physiotherapies (PTs) for the removal of bronchial secretions in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung disease: autogenic drainage (AD) and the Flutter (Desitin in Germany). AD is believed to improve mucus clearance from peripheral to central airways due to airway caliber changes in combination with a special breathing technique. The Flutter is an easy-to-use physiotherapy device based on oscillations of a steel ball during expiration through a pipe-type device.
                To evaluate the acute and chronic physiotherapy effects of these two techniques, 14 CF patients underwent either twice daily AD or Flutter treatment for 4 consecutive weeks in a randomized crossover design. Prior to each therapy interval, for a 1-week wash-out period, no PT was administered, but patients continued regular medication. At the beginning and end of each 4-week interval, pulmonary function was measured before and after an acute 30-min therapy. At the end of the PT session, sputum was collected, weighed, and deep frozen until analyzed. The viscoelasticity of the sputum was evaluated using a magnetic microrheometer.
                No significant changes were noted for FVC, FEV1, or sputum volume throughout the study. Sputum viscoelasticity (rigidity index), however, was significantly lower (p<0.01) after therapy with the Flutter in comparison with AD, predicting improvements in mucociliary and cough clearability of the secretions. In a companion in vitro experiment, oscillations generated by passing humidified air over CF sputum lining an acrylic tube connected to a Flutter de-ice were found to decrease sputum elasticity, as measured by a filancemeter. These findings suggest that applied oscillations are capable of decreasing mucus viscoelasticity within the airways at frequencies and amplitudes achievable with the Flutter device, and provide direct evidence that PT can reduce the viscoelasticity of sputum. Recently, the flutter was introduced as a new device to improve sputum expectoration. Preliminary data suggested a significant improvement in expectoration and lung function during flutter treatment in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of the flutter and the positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask on symptoms and lung function in children with CF. In a crossover randomized study 22 patients with CF (mean age 12 yrs, range 7-17 yrs) performed physiotherapy using either the flutter or the PEP mask twice a day during two treatment periods of 2 weeks, separated by a one week wash-out period, in a random sequence. Lung function parameters (peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second, maximal midexpiratory flow, maximal expiratory flow at 25% of FVC, thoracic gas volume, total lung capacity, residual volume/total lung capacity, airway resistance and specific airway conductance) and changes in transcutaneous oxygen haemoglobin saturation were assessed before and after the first supervised session and at the end of each treatment period. Throughout the study peak flow was measured and symptoms were scored daily. No significant changes in any lung function parameter occurred after a single session or after 2 weeks of physiotherapy with either method. There was no difference in acceptability and subjective efficacy. In conclusion, any superiority of the flutter over the positive expiratory pressure mask technique for expectoration could not be confirmed during 2 weeks of daily treatment in children with cystic fibrosis. Both methods are well accepted by children and do not change lung function. Long-term comparison of both methods, including expectoration measurements, seems to be required for further evaluation of the potential success of physiotherapy in cystic fibrosis. High frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) is standard treatment for airway clearance in the USA and has recently been introduced in the UK and Europe. There is little published research comparing HFCWO with airway clearance techniques (ACTs) frequently used in the UK and Europe. The aim of this study was to compare the short-term effects of HFCWO with usual ACTs in patients with cystic fibrosis hospitalised with an infective pulmonary exacerbation.
                A 4-day randomised crossover design was used. Patients received either HFCWO on days 1 and 3 and usual ACTs on days 2 and 4 or vice versa. Wet weight of sputum, spirometry and oxygen saturation were measured. Perceived efficacy, comfort, incidence of urinary leakage and preference were assessed. Data were analysed by mixed model analysis.
                29 patients (72% male) of mean (SD) age 29.4 (8.4) years and mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) percentage predicted (FEV(1)%) 38 (16.7) completed the study. Significantly more sputum was expectorated during a single treatment session and over a 24 h period (mean difference 4.4 g and 6.9 g, respectively) with usual ACTs than with HFCWO (p<0.001). No statistically significant change in FEV(1)% or oxygen saturation was observed after either HFCWO or usual ACTs compared with baseline. 17 patients (55%) expressed a preference for their usual ACT.
                During both a finite treatment period and over 24 h, less sputum was cleared using HFCWO than usual ACT. HFCWO does not appear to cause any adverse physiological effects and may influence adherence. We compared standard chest physical therapy and postural drainage (CPT/PD) with a new airway clearance therapy called high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) in a group of stable cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. In this crossover trial, 29 CF patients (15 males, 14 females), aged 7-47 years that met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to alternate CPT/PD and HFCWO, on a daily basis, over a 4 day period. Each patient received 2 days of each form of therapy; treatment frequency and the length of treatment were the same for both techniques. Expectorated secretions were collected during each 30 minute therapy session and for 15 minutes following treatment. The wet and dry weights of collected secretions were determined gravimetrically, and the therapy methods were compared. Significantly more sputum was expectorated during HFCWO than during CPT/PD as determined by both the wet (P < 0.001) and the dry (P < 0.01) measurements. This study suggests that HFCWO is at least as effective as manual CPT/PD in clearing secretions from the airways in patients with cystic fibrosis. The objective was to evaluate the long-term effects of physiotherapy with an oscillating positive pressure device ("flutter") compared with physiotherapy with the use of a positive expiratory pressure (PEP) mask in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Study design: Forty children with CF were randomly assigned to performing physiotherapy with the PEP mask or the flutter device for 1 year. Clinical status, pulmonary function, and compliance were measured at regular intervals throughout the study.
                The flutter group demonstrated a greater mean annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity compared with the PEP group (-8.62 +/- 15.5 vs 0.06 +/- 7.9; P =.05) with a similar trend in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (-10.95 +/- 19.96 vs -1.24 +/- 9.9; P =.08). There was a significant decline in Huang scores (P =.05), increased hospitalizations (18 vs 5; P =.03), and antibiotic use in the flutter group.
                Flutter was not as effective in maintaining pulmonary function in this group of patients with CF compared with PEP and was more costly because of the increased number of hospitalizations and antibiotic use. The authors developed a high-frequency chest compression (HFCC) device to aid in mucous clearance for patients with obstructive lung disease. The device, designed for self-therapy, consists of a large-volume variable-frequency air-pulse delivery system and a nonstretchable inflatable vest worn by the patient. Pressure pulses are controlled by the patient and applied during expiration. Pulse frequency is tunable from 5 to 25 Hz. Maximum vest pressure is 39 mmHg (5.2 kPa), with patient-controlled vest inflation and deflation time constants of 0.5 s. Vest pressure increases from 28 mmHg (3.7 kPa) at 5 Hz to 39 mmHg (5.2 kPa) at 25 Hz. Preliminary clinical trials have shown the HFCC device to be more effective than standard chest physical therapy. The HFCC device yielded a mean volume of cleared mucus of 3.3 cc per session, compared with 1.8 cc for a conventional therapy session. Enhanced airway clearance is thought to result in better-maintained pulmonary function in cystic fibrosis (CF). Postural drainage, percussion, and vibration (PDPV) have been the primary airway clearance technique (ACT) employed in CF for over 40 years. Two new airway clearance modalities are high-frequency chest wall oscillation (HFCWO) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP). This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of these techniques during home use, assess patient satisfaction with them as compared to PDPV, and assess the feasibility of performing a definitive comparative trial. The prospective, randomized, multicenter crossover trial was conducted at three urban academic CF Care Centers. Twenty-nine CF patients, 9-39 years of age, participated. Subjects performed 4 weeks each of HFCWO and OPEP following 2-week lead-in/washout periods. Spirometry, lung volumes, National Institutes of Health and Petty Scores, and a satisfaction survey were performed at baseline and after each treatment period. An ACT preference survey was completed at the conclusion of the study. Twenty-four subjects completed both therapies. There were no statistically significant differences between therapies for spirometry, lung volumes, or clinical scores. No significant safety issues arose during the study period. Compliance between therapies was similar. Significant differences among therapies existed in patient satisfaction. Given a choice of therapy, 50% of subjects chose HFCWO, 37% OPEP, and 13% PDPV. This study suggests that HFCWO and OPEP are safe and as effective as patients' routine therapies when used for airway clearance in a home setting. Patient satisfaction and preference differ among ACTs and should be considered when prescribing home therapy. A definitive, multi-center, comparative study evaluating long-term efficacy of these techniques is feasible.
                Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc. The Flutter VRP1 (Flutter) is claimed to increase the clearance of excess bronchial secretions and to improve lung function and oxygenation, but these claims were based on computer models, laboratory assisted experiments and uncontrolled clinical trials. A prospective randomized clinical trial was undertaken, in subjects with cystic fibrosis, using the active cycle of breathing techniques as the 'gold standard'. The claims could not be substantiated and the possibility of sputum retention was of concern when the Flutter was used as significantly more sputum (P < 0.001) was cleared with the active cycle of breathing techniques alone. There were no significant changes in lung function or oxygenation. Chest physiotherapy (CPT) is recommended for the clearance of bronchial secretions in the management of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The Flutter valve (Scandipharm, Birmingham, AL) has been introduced as an alternative method to CPT for airway mucus clearance. The objective of this study was to compare the short-term effects of CPT and the Flutter valve on pulmonary function and exercise tolerance in patients with cystic fibrosis. Twenty-three patients, 5 to 21 years of age, were randomized to receive one of two interventions: CPT or the Flutter valve, upon admission to the hospital for a 2-week treatment of pulmonary exacerbation. Pulmonary function testing (PFTs) and the 6-min walk test were performed on admission, day 7, and day 14 of hospitalization. Data analysis indicated no significant differences between the two groups on admission. Both groups showed improvement in pulmonary function test results, but the Flutter group had a higher mean forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) compared to the CPT group after 1 week of intervention. Both groups continued to improve during the 2-week intervention, with no significant difference in FVC or FEV(1) between groups by the end of 2 weeks. Mean forced expiratory flow rate between 25-75% of vital capacity (FEF(25-75)), 6-min walk distance, and resting arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation (SaO(2)) showed little change by day 7, but improved significantly (P< 0.05) by day 14 of hospitalization in both groups, with no significant difference between groups. This study demonstrated that patients using the Flutter device had better pulmonary function after 1 week of therapy and similar improvement in pulmonary function and exercise tolerance compared to CPT after 2 weeks of therapy, suggesting that Flutter valve therapy is an acceptable alternative to standard CPT during in-hospital care of patients with CF.
                Copyright 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Clearance of bronchial secretions is essential in the management of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients admitted for acute pulmonary exacerbation. Conventional physiotherapy (CPT) is labor-intensive, time-consuming, expensive, and may not be available as frequently as desired during hospitalization. High frequency chest compression (HFCC), which uses an inflatable vest linked to an air-pulse delivery system, may offer an attractive alternative. To study this, we prospectively studied 50 CF patients admitted for acute pulmonary exacerbation who were randomly allocated to receive either HFCC or CPT three times a day. On admission, clinical status and pulmonary function tests (PFT) in the HFCC group were not significantly different from those measured in the CPT group. Significant improvements in clinical status and PFT were observed after 7 and 14 d of treatment, and were similar in the two study groups, leading to patient discharge after similar periods of hospitalization. We conclude that HFCC and CPT are equally safe and effective when used during acute pulmonary exacerbations in CF patients. We speculate that HFCC may provide an adequate alternative in management of CF patients in a hospital setting. High-frequency chest compressions (HFCC) have been suggested as an alternative to conventional chest physiotherapy to aid sputum clearance in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). We aimed to compare the active cycle of breathing techniques (ACBT) with the Hayek Oscillator Cuirass, performing HFCC on secretion clearance in children with CF during an exacerbation. Ten children (7 males; median age, 14 years; range, 9-16) received either two supervised sessions using HFCC or two self-treatment ACBT sessions in random order on successive days. Baseline pulmonary function was similar prior to treatments. Sputum weight increased significantly with ACBT compared with HFCC during treatment (5.2 g vs. 1.1 g, P < 0.005, morning; 4.1 g vs. 0.7 g, P < 0.01, afternoon). Pulmonary function improved significantly after morning ACBT (forced vital capacity (FVC): 2.67 l to 2.76 l, P < 0.03; forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1): 1.59 l to 1.62 l, P < 0.03). Following afternoon ACBT, there was a significant increase in FVC (2.64 to 2.79, P < 0.02), but no significant change in FEV1. Pulmonary function did not change at any time following HFCC. Compared with ACBT, HFCC by Hayek Cuirass is not an effective airway clearance treatment modality for children with CF during an infective exacerbation.
                Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
There was no clear evidence that oscillation was a more or less effective intervention overall than other forms of physiotherapy. More adequately-powered long-term randomised controlled trials are necessary.