Acyclovir given as prophylaxis against oral ulcers in acute myeloid leukaemia: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Acyclovir prophylaxis in bone marrow transplant recipients. Once-daily intravenous acyclovir for prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation. The prophylactic role of intravenous and long-term oral acyclovir after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Oral acyclovir for prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation. Oral acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia patients receiving remission induction chemotherapy. A randomised double blind, placebo controlled trial. Acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus infection in patients with leukemia. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Oral acyclovir therapy for mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infections in immunocompromised marrow transplant recipients. Oral acyclovir as prophylaxis for bacterial infections during induction therapy for acute leukaemia in adults. The Leukemia Group of Middle Sweden. Oral valacyclovir as prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus reactivation during high dose chemotherapy for leukemia. Valacyclovir versus acyclovir for HSV prophylaxisin neutropenic patients. Prostaglandin E2 for prophylaxis of oral mucositis following BMT. Sequential intravenous and twice-daily oral acyclovir for extended prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus infection in marrow transplant patients. Multicenter collaborative trial of intravenous acyclovir for treatment of mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in the immunocompromised host. Effect of acyclovir on radiation- and chemotherapy-induced mouth lesions. Oral acyclovir prophylactic treatment of herpes simplex infection after bone marrow transplantation. Oral valacyclovir versus intravenous acyclovir in preventing herpes simplex virus infections in autologous stem cell transplant recipients.
To evaluate (a) the prophylactic effect of the antiherpetic drug acyclovir on oral ulcers in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia receiving remission induction chemotherapy and thus (b), indirectly, the role of herpes simplex virus in the aetiology of these ulcers.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.
                74 herpes simplex virus seropositive patients aged 18-84. Thirty seven patients received acyclovir (800 mg by mouth daily) and 37 placebo. The patients were examined daily for 28 days.
                Occurrence of herpes labialis, intraoral ulcers, and acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis.
                The two populations were comparable in age, sex, type of antineoplastic treatment, and history of herpes labialis. Acute oral infections occurred in 25 of the acyclovir treated patients and 36 of the placebo treated patients (relative risk 0.69 (95% confidence interval 0.55 to 0.87)). This difference was due to a reduction in the incidence of herpes labialis (one case versus eight cases; relative risk 0.13 (0.02 to 0.95)), intraoral ulcers excluding the soft palate (one case versus 13 cases; relative risk 0.08 (0.01 to 0.56)), and acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis (one case versus eight cases; relative risk 0.13 (0.02 to 0.95)). However, ulcers on the soft palate were diagnosed with similar frequency in the two groups. Isolation of herpes simplex virus type 1 in saliva was reduced from 15 cases in the placebo group to one case in the acyclovir group (relative risk 0.07 (0.01 to 0.48)).
                Intraoral ulcers excluding the soft palate are most often due to infection with herpes simplex virus, whereas ulcers on the soft palate have a non-herpetic aetiology. The findings suggest that acute necrotising ulcerative gingivitis may also be due to herpes simplex virus. Prophylaxis with acyclovir should be considered for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia during remission induction therapy. Forty-two patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation were included in a randomised, double-blind and placebo controlled trial of prolonged acyclovir prophylaxis against infections with viruses of the herpes group. Twenty patients were allocated to receive acyclovir and 22 to receive placebo. Acyclovir or placebo was administered i.v. at a dose of 250 mg/m2 twice daily, starting 5 days before transplantation. At 5 weeks after transplantation, administration was changed to tablets, 400 mg three times daily (children less than 6 years, 200 mg three times daily) and continued until 6 months after transplantation. In the placebo group, 10 acute herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections occurred in 7 patients (5 HSV-1 and 2 HSV-2), and another patient repeatedly shed HSV in throat washings. Five patients developed herpes zoster. Among patients receiving acyclovir only one episode of HSV infection occurred and no herpes zoster. The difference in the number of infection episodes and the number of infected patients was strongly significant (p = 0.0002 and 0.0017, respectively). The only acyclovir patient who reactivated HSV was terminally ill, and it is highly likely that she did not absorb a sufficient amount of the orally administered drug to control infection. All HSV and varicella zoster virus (VZV) infections were reactivations, and 9 of 10 patients who developed HSV infections or shed virus had a pre-transplantation HSV IgG titer of greater than 10 000 (ELISA). Acyclovir had no effect on cytomegalovirus (CMV), time of engraftment, or graft versus host disease (GVHD). Apart from a possible allergic reaction (skin rash) to acyclovir tablets, no adverse reactions were seen during this long prophylaxis with acyclovir. To determine the most convenient and least expensive regimen for prevention of recurrent herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection after marrow transplantation, we conducted a randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous acyclovir 250 mg/m2 and placebo given once daily for four weeks. Six of 14 acyclovir and nine of 13 placebo recipients shed HSV during prophylaxis. All nine culture-positive placebo recipients developed associated lesions during prophylaxis compared to four of six acyclovir recipients. Median time to first culture-positive lesion was significantly delayed by acyclovir compared to placebo (33 days after transplant vs. 10; P = 0.05). Acyclovir-resistant HSV was recovered from one acyclovir recipient while receiving prophylactic acyclovir, and from two placebo recipients during subsequent administration of therapeutic acyclovir. Once-daily intravenous acyclovir can significantly delay time to appearance of culture-positive HSV lesions after marrow transplant, but virological and clinical breakthrough may occur and optimal prevention will require administration of intravenous acyclovir more than once daily. Eighty-two patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous acyclovir 5 mg kg-1 t.d.s. for 23 days followed by oral acyclovir 800 mg 6-hourly for 6 months or matching placebos after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Herpes simplex and varicella zoster virus infections were significantly reduced during the period of administration of acyclovir. No reduction in cytomegalovirus infection was demonstrated. The drug was not toxic. Oral acyclovir was found to be safe and effective for the prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acyclovir or placebo was administered to 49 patients for 5 weeks beginning 1 week before transplantation: 5 of 24 patients receiving acyclovir developed herpes simplex virus infection during prophylaxis, compared to 17 of 25 patients receiving placebo (p less than 0.01). The median time to first virus reactivation was significantly longer among patients receiving acyclovir (78 days versus 9 days after transplant, p = 0.006). The effect was even more pronounced when the analysis was adjusted for drug compliance: Among patients taking a minimum of 40% of their prescribed drug, acyclovir was 96% virologically effective and 100% clinically effective during the period of administration. Acyclovir use was also associated with significantly more rapid marrow engraftment in patients receiving methotrexate. No virus resistant to acyclovir was isolated. Oral acyclovir provides effective prophylaxis against reactivation of herpes simplex virus among severely immunosuppressed patients able to take orally administered drugs. Forty-one patients receiving remission induction chemotherapy with vincristine, adriamycin and prednisolone (VAP) for high grade lymphoma or acute lymphoblastic leukaemia were entered into a double blind, placebo controlled trial of oral acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection. The dose of acyclovir was 200 mg four times daily for the duration of chemotherapy (six weeks). Of the 40 evaluable patients, 20 were randomised to each arm. Prophylactic oral acyclovir significantly reduced the incidence of clinical HSV infection from 60% on placebo to 5% acyclovir (P less than 0.001), and the incidence of viral isolates from 70% on placebo to 5% on acyclovir (P less than 0.001). Twenty-nine adult patients with acute leukemia receiving timed sequential chemotherapy participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of acyclovir prophylaxis against reactivated herpes simplex virus infection. Patients with pretreatment antibody titers of 1:16 or greater received acyclovir or placebo starting 4 days after their initial chemotherapy. Treatment was given either for 32 days or until the patients were discharged from the hospital or until a culture-positive herpes simplex virus infection was found. Culture-positive herpes simplex virus infection developed in 11 of 15 patients who received placebo. No infection appeared in 14 patients who received acyclovir (p less than 0.00005). No obvious acute drug toxicity was seen. Recurrent infection was seen in 6 of 14 patients after cessation of acyclovir when retreated with chemotherapy, suggesting no effect on viral latency in these 6 patients. Acyclovir provided highly effective prophylaxis against reactivated herpes simplex virus infections in adult patients with acute leukemia receiving timed sequential chemotherapy. In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, we compared the therapeutic effect of oral acyclovir (400 mg five times daily for 10 days) with that of placebo in patients with marrow transplants and culture-proven recurrent mucocutaneous herpes simplex. Twelve patients received acyclovir and nine received placebo. Acyclovir treatment significantly shortened the median duration of viral shedding, new lesion formation, and time to first decrease in pain, resolution of pain, 50% healing, and total healing. These results compared favorably with those previously obtained with intravenous or topical acyclovir preparations. Oral acyclovir is highly effective for the treatment of recurrent mucocutaneous infections caused by herpes simplex virus in immunocompromised patients. We prospectively tested the hypothesis that prevention of herpes simplex virus infection with acyclovir might also reduce the incidence of bacterial infections in adult patients with acute leukaemia. During the first induction therapy a double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study was undertaken. Fifty-two patients were treated with 200 mg acyclovir orally four times daily throughout the induction period, whereas 55 patients received placebo. The groups were comparable with regard to age, cytotoxic chemotherapy and duration of neutropenia. Bacteraemias were significantly fewer in the acyclovir group (20 versus 41 episodes; P = 0.007). The number of isolated microorganisms causing bacterial or fungal infections was also lower during acyclovir prophylaxis (52 isolates, versus 93 isolates; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between the groups with regard to the number of clinically documented infections or fevers of unknown origin. Herpes simplex virus isolations occurred only in the placebo group (P = 0.001). Thus, oral acyclovir prophylaxis was associated with reductions of all microbiologically documented infections suggesting that prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation in acute leukaemia patients may reduce the occurrence of other infections. Reactivation of herpes simplex virus is a common event in patients undergoing dose-intensive remission induction or consolidation chemotherapy of acute leukemia, for which either intravenous or oral acyclovir provides effective prophylaxis. This drug's short serum half-life and low oral bioavailability make frequent dosing necessary, however, and we therefore sought to determine if the pro-drug valacyclovir, which has improved bioavailability, could be successfully substituted for this indication. Eighty-one patients with leukemia were randomized to receive either 500 mg or 1,000 mg of valacyclovir orally every 8 h and followed clinically, as well as with serial surveillance cultures. Over a total of 1,979 days on study between the groups, and 380 throat cultures, no documented episodes of herpes simplex reactivation were noted. Valacyclovir was tolerated well with no evident drug-related toxicities. We conclude that valacyclovir at either of the two doses studied can be safely substituted for oral or intravenous acyclovir, and that it provides effective prophylaxis against reactivation of herpes simplex virus in this patient population. It is common practice to administer acyclovir as prophylaxis to patients with hematologic malignancies during neutropenia; however, effective therapy requires frequent dosing, which is difficult in this setting. Valacyclovir has greater oral bioavailability and requires less frequent dosing.
                To evaluate the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir compared with acyclovir.
                Patients who had been treated with chemotherapy or stem-cell transplantation were randomized to receive acyclovir 400 mg orally 3 times daily (n = 51), valacyclovir 500 mg orally twice daily (n = 48), or valacyclovir 250 mg orally twice daily (n = 52) during neutropenia.
                Clinical success, defined as the absence of an active herpes simplex virus (HSV) lesion or asymptomatic viral shedding, was similar between the 3 groups (acyclovir 96%, valacyclovir 500 mg 95%, valacyclovir 250 mg 100%). The overall rates of adverse events were similar in the 3 groups.
                Prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir is an effective and safe alternative to acyclovir for the prevention of HSV reactivation in patients with hematologic malignancies. Between October 1988 and December 1990, 60 patients with leukaemia (25 with AML, 19 ALL and 16 CML) undergoing BMT were randomised in a double-blind clinical trial to receive prostaglandin E2 (PGE) (Prostin E2, 0.5 mg per tablet) or placebo for prophylaxis of oral mucositis. Patients had to dissolve tablets in the mouth three times daily starting 7 days before BMT and continuing until 21 days after BMT. The incidence of severe oral mucositis was similar for both groups, 55% in patients receiving PGE and 52% in patients receiving placebo. The duration of severe mucositis did not differ between PGE and placebo groups (chi-square 0.95, p = NS). The incidence of HSV infection was significantly higher in patients receiving PGE. Patients with HSV infection receiving PGE also had a higher incidence of severe oral mucositis. The results presented indicate that PGE is not effective for prophylaxis of oral mucositis in BMT recipients. To define an effective and convenient means for providing extended prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection to chronically immunocompromised patients, we studied a two-part regimen of intravenous, followed by oral, acyclovir after marrow transplantation. Seropositive patients were first given intravenous acyclovir until day 30 after transplant. Intravenous acyclovir (250 mgm/m2) given twice daily to 34 patients during this period was 90% virologically effective among those completing the prophylactic course. A randomized, double-blind comparison of twice-daily oral acyclovir (800 mg) and placebo was then conducted from day 31 to day 75 after transplant in 51 patients. Oral acyclovir significantly delayed the median time to first excretion of HSV when compared with placebo (greater than 100 vs. 70 days after transplant, P = 0.0006) and was completely effective in all patients for the duration of drug administration. Patients receiving extended prophylaxis appeared to have less-severe HSV infection when later recurrences did occur. Sequential intravenous and oral acyclovir given twice daily is an effective and convenient regimen for extended prophylaxis of HSV infection following marrow transplantation, and should be useful in other transplant patients or other chronically immunosuppressed patients as well. Intravenous acyclovir was evaluated in the treatment of 97 immunocompromised patients with mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Acyclovir recipients had significantly shorter periods of virus shedding (p less than 0.0002) and lesion pain (p less than 0.01), and more rapid lesion scabbing (p less than 0.004) and lesion healing (p less than 0.04). The most common adverse reaction was a low incidence of peripheral vein irritation; no serious toxicity could be definitely attributed to acyclovir treatment even in these seriously ill patients. Intravenous acyclovir offers both safe and effective treatment for mucocutaneous herpes simplex virus infection in the immunocompromised host. Several chemotherapeutic regimens and radiation therapy, if delivered to the oral mucosa, are associated with a high frequency of mouth lesions. The cause of this side effect is not known for certain, but in past studies it has sometimes been associated with the ability to culture herpes simplex virus type 1 from the mouth. In a double-blind prospective trial, patients with head and neck tumors treated with chemotherapy or radiation therapy were treated with either acyclovir or placebo. Although the frequency of culture-positive herpes simplex virus was low in the untreated group, it was significantly lower, zero, in the acyclovir-treated group. However, there were no differences in the frequency or type of mouth lesions experienced by patients receiving either radiation or chemotherapy who were taking acyclovir or placebo. These results suggest that herpes simplex virus is not a frequent cause or complication of oral lesions afflicting this patient population. In a double-blind controlled study, oral acyclovir has been compared to a placebo in a series of 39 consecutive patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. A dose of 200 mg was given every 6 h from day 8 to day 35 after transplantation. Pharmacokinetic studies have shown the good absorption of the drug despite intestinal damage related to chemoradiotherapy or gut graft-versus-host disease (GVHD); there was no sign of toxicity. The protection against herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection was complete in the treated group when compared to the control group even in patients with high anti-HSV antibody titres. The same protection was observed against cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. The incidence of HSV and CMV was the same in both groups after treatment ended. This study confirms the efficacy of acyclovir against HSV infection and possibly against CMV infection when it is given prophylactically after bone marrow transplantation. Patients who are seropositive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and are undergoing autologous marrow or peripheral blood stem cell transplantation require prophylaxis for HSV infection. Most prophylaxis regimens have used intravenous acyclovir (ACY). Oral valacyclovir (VAL), the L-valyl ester of ACY, can be used to achieve plasma concentrations equivalent to levels achieved with intravenous ACY. In this study, adults undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation were randomized to receive ACY, 250 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 12 hours from day 0 to engraftment, or VAL, 1 g orally every 12 hours from day 0 to engraftment. The primary study objective was to compare cost of HSV prophylaxis between study groups. Thirty patients were randomized to receive either oral VAL (n = 14) or IV ACY (n = 16) prophylaxis. Mean pharmacy cost of HSV prophylaxis in the patient group randomized to IV ACY was $1080 versus $320 for the group randomized initially to VAL. This study demonstrates the feasibility and significant cost savings of using oral VAL for HSV prophylaxis.
There is evidence that aciclovir is efficacious in the prevention and treatment of herpes simplex virus infections. There is no evidence that valaciclovir is more efficacious than aciclovir, or that a high dose of valaciclovir is better than a low dose of valaciclovir. There is evidence that as a prophylaxis, placebo is more efficacious than prostaglandin E. However, in all included trials, risk of bias is unclear.