Usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in patients with surgical jaundice--a prospective randomised study. Does preoperative percutaneous biliary drainage reduce operative risk or increase hospital cost? Preoperative biliary drainage for cancer of the head of the pancreas. Preoperative external biliary drainage in obstructive jaundice. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: the results of a controlled trial. Preoperative endoscopic drainage for malignant obstructive jaundice.
Patients with obstructive jaundice undergoing surgical procedures have a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. The role of preoperative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was evaluated in a randomized trial.
                A total of 40 patients were assigned to either preoperative PTBD (n = 20), or surgery alone (n = 20). PTBD was performed under ultrasound guidance. There were no major complications related to the procedure.
                Ultrasound guided drainage was a successful and safe method of preoperative biliary decompression. There was a marked relief from pruritus and significant reduction of hyperbilirubinaemia from a mean of 386.48 mumol/L to 116.10 mumol/L (p < 0.001). Mean duration of drainage was 42.5 days. Postoperative complications occurred in five patients in PTBD group (25%) compared to 11 patients (55%) in the control group. One death (5%) occurred in PTBD group compared to four deaths (20%) in the control group (significant at 5% level with probability 0.2).
                Ultrasound guided drainage is a useful preoperative supportive measure in preparing deeply jaundiced patients for surgery and permits hepatic function to return to a near normal state preoperatively. The improved results in our study were due to longer duration of drainage. Despite recent advances in perioperative support care, surgery for obstructive jaundice is still associated with significant morbidity and mortality. For this reason, preoperative percutaneous transhepatic drainage (PTD) has been recommended for these patients. This method of management, however, has only been supported by retrospective and nonrandomized studies. Therefore, a prospective, randomized study was performed to determine the effect of preoperative PTD on operative mortality, morbidity, hospital stay, and hospital cost. Thirty-day mortality was 8.1% among 37 patients undergoing preoperative PTD, compared to 5.3% for 38 patients who went to surgery without preoperative drainage. Overall morbidity was also slightly, but not significantly, higher in patients who underwent preoperative PTD, (57% versus 53%). However, total hospital stay was significantly longer (p less than 0.005) in the PTD group (31.4 days versus 23.1 days). The cost of this excess hospitalization and the PTD procedure at our university medical center was over +8000 per patient. The authors conclude that preoperative PTD does not reduce operative risk but does increase hospital cost and, therefore, should not be performed routinely. The benefits of preoperative biliary drainage, which was introduced to improve the postoperative outcome in patients with obstructive jaundice caused by a tumor of the pancreatic head, are unclear.
                In this multicenter, randomized trial, we compared preoperative biliary drainage with surgery alone for patients with cancer of the pancreatic head. Patients with obstructive jaundice and a bilirubin level of 40 to 250 micromol per liter (2.3 to 14.6 mg per deciliter) were randomly assigned to undergo either preoperative biliary drainage for 4 to 6 weeks, followed by surgery, or surgery alone within 1 week after diagnosis. Preoperative biliary drainage was attempted primarily with the placement of an endoprosthesis by means of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. The primary outcome was the rate of serious complications within 120 days after randomization.
                We enrolled 202 patients; 96 were assigned to undergo early surgery and 106 to undergo preoperative biliary drainage; 6 patients were excluded from the analysis. The rates of serious complications were 39% (37 patients) in the early-surgery group and 74% (75 patients) in the biliary-drainage group (relative risk in the early-surgery group, 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.71; P<0.001). Preoperative biliary drainage was successful in 96 patients (94%) after one or more attempts, with complications in 47 patients (46%). Surgery-related complications occurred in 35 patients (37%) in the early-surgery group and in 48 patients (47%) in the biliary-drainage group (relative risk, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.11; P=0.14). Mortality and the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups.
                Routine preoperative biliary drainage in patients undergoing surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head increases the rate of complications. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN31939699.)
                2010 Massachusetts Medical Society 57 patients with obstructive jaundice were randomly allocated to surgery with preoperative external biliary drainage (29 patients) and without preoperative external biliary drainage (28 patients). 22 patients ultimately underwent laparotomy after a mean of 11.7 days of drainage and 25 had surgery without preoperative drainage. The postoperative complication rate was low and similar in both groups but complications associated with the drainage procedure were substantial. Perioperative mortality was 4/28 (14%) in the drainage group and 4/27 (15%) in the non-drainage group. There seems to be no advantage associated with routine preoperative external biliary drainage before surgery for obstructive jaundice. The operative mortality for biliary tract obstruction due to malignancy is high. In 1981 a controlled clinical trial of pre-operative percutaneous drainage was started at the Royal Postgraduate Medical School. At the time of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography patients were randomized either to laparotomy or to pre-operative percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage ( PTBD ) followed by laparotomy. Only patients with malignant biliary tract obstruction and serum bilirubin greater than 100 mumol/l were included. Seventy patients entered the trial, and five were withdrawn. Of the 65 remaining, 31 underwent laparotomy and 34 had pre-operative PTBD followed by laparotomy. The median duration of drainage was 18 days and during this time the median bilirubin fell from 305 to 115 mumol/l. Five patients required early surgery for complications of PTBD and two died within 30 days of surgery. The mortality for laparotomy was 19 per cent (6/31) compared with 32 per cent (11/34) for drainage plus laparotomy. This trial highlights the hazards of PTBD in high risk patients and has failed to demonstrate a reduction in mortality with the use of pre-operative PTBD . The role of preoperative endoscopic drainage for patients with malignant obstructive jaundice was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. A total of 87 patients were assigned to either early elective surgery (44 patients) or endoscopic biliary drainage followed by exploration (43). Thirty-seven patients underwent successful stent insertion and 25 had effective biliary drainage. Complications related to endoscopy occurred in 12 patients. After endoscopic drainage significant reductions of hyperbilirubinaemia, indocyanine green retention and serum albumin concentration were observed. Patients with hilar lesions had a significantly higher incidence of cholangitis and failed endoscopic drainage after stent placement. The overall morbidity rate (18 patients versus 16) and mortality rate (six patients in each group) were similar in the two treatment arms irrespective of the level of biliary obstruction. Despite the improvement of liver function, routine application of endoscopic drainage had no demonstrable benefit. Endoscopic drainage is indicated only when early surgery is not feasible, especially for patients with distal obstruction.
There is currently not sufficient evidence to support or refute routine pre-operative biliary drainage for patients with obstructive jaundice. Pre-operative biliary drainage may increase the rate of serious adverse events. So, the safety of routine pre-operative biliary drainage has not been established. Pre-operative biliary drainage should not be used in patients undergoing surgery for obstructive jaundice outside randomised clinical trials.