[Inguinal hernias in adults. Laparoscopic surgery versus the Shouldice method. Controlled randomized study: 181 patients. Preliminary results]. Inguinal hernia repair: totally preperitoneal laparoscopic approach versus Stoppa operation: randomized trial of 100 cases. [Standardized laparoscopic hernioplasty vs. Shouldice repair. Results of a randomized comparative study]. A prospective, randomized study of open vs laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. An assessment of postoperative pain. Laparoscopic versus open repair of groin hernia: a randomised comparison. The MRC Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group. Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair. A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic extraperitoneal hernia repair as a day surgical procedure. A cost and outcome comparison between laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernia operations in a day-case unit. A randomized prospective study. Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized prospective trial. [Medico-economic evaluation of treatment of inguinal hernia: Shouldice vs. laparoscopy]. An assessment of pain and return to normal activity. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy vs open tension-free Lichtenstein repair. [Management of inguinal hernia--a comparison of current methods]. Surgical outcome and cost-minimisation-analyses of laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a randomised prospective trial with one year follow up. Prospective randomized trial comparing postoperative pain and return to physical activity after transabdominal preperitoneal, total preperitoneal or Shouldice technique for inguinal hernia repair. Open or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia? A randomized controlled trial. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: randomised prospective trial. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. [Prospective controlled study comparing laparoscopy and the Shouldice technique in the treatment of unilateral inguinal hernia]. Laparoscopic vs open inguinal hernia repair. A randomized, controlled trial. [Prospective randomized comparative study of laparoscopic hernioplasty and Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty]. Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomized controlled trial of early results. Laparoscopic versus open inguinal herniorrhaphy: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized multicenter trial (SCUR Hernia Repair Study). Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open repair of inguinal hernia: early results. A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. A prospective randomized outcome and cost comparison of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty versus Lichtenstein hernia operation among employed patients. Controlled multicenter trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice herniorrhaphy. Early results. Posterior approaches in groin hernia repair with prosthesis: open or closed. Bassini repair compared with laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia: a randomised controlled trial. Laparoscopic versus open preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomised trial. A comparison of laparoscopic and open hernia repair as a day surgical procedure.
181 patients have been included in a controlled randomized prospective study to compare two hernia repair technics: Classic al Shouldice herniography vs totally pre-peritoneal video-surgery. There was no mortality and no difference concerning morbidity, operating time and hospital stay. Videosurgery allows detection and treatment of some bilateral hernias not diagnosed by clinical exam, ensures better post-operative comfort and has a significant effect on the time to return to work (12.5 vs 24.3 days). There was no recurrence in either group with a 12-month follow-up. These patients must be followed for a long time to compare their late results with those of conventional technics. In a prospective randomized trial comparing the totally preperitoneal (TPP) laparoscopic approach and the Stoppa procedure (open), 100 patients with inguinal hernias (Nyhus IIIA, IIIB, IV) were followed over a 3-year period. Both groups were epidemiologically comparable. In the laparoscopic group, operating time was significantly longer (p = 0.01), but hospital stay (3.2 vs. 7.3 days) and delay in return to work (17 vs. 35 days) were significantly reduced (p = 0.01). Postoperative comfort (less pain) was better (p = 0.001) after laparoscopy. In this group, morbidity was also reduced (4 vs. 20%; p = 0.02). The mean follow-up was 605 days, and 93% of the patients were reviewed at 3 years. There were three (6%) recurrences after TPP, especially at the beginning of the surgeon's learning curve, versus one for the Stoppa procedure (NS). For bilateral hernias, the authors suggest the use of a large prosthesis rather than two small ones to minimize the likelihood of recurrence. In the conditions described, the laparoscopic (TPP) approach to inguinal hernia treatment appears to have the same long-term recurrence rate as the open (Stoppa) procedure but a real advantage in the early postoperative period. From 5/93 up to 12/93 a prospective randomized trial was performed. 102 patients with unilateral primary inguinal hernias were included. In 48 patients a Shouldice repair and in 54 patients a laparoscopic TAPP procedure was performed. The laparoscopic method is described. There were significantly less pain and quicker mobility in the laparoscopic group. In addition a shorter period of disability of work was seen (21 vs. 38 days) in the same group. The morbidity of the procedures was as low in the Shouldice as in the laparoscopic group. There was a regular control of all patients. The current follow-up period is 16 months (13-21) in median. In both groups there were no recurrences up to now. The efficiency of laparoscopic hernia repair is discussed. To compare postoperative pain after laparoscopic hernia repair and conventional open hernia repair.
                Prospective, randomized study.
                Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
                Sixty-two patients scheduled for elective inguinal hernia repair.
                Patients were randomized in the operating room to have a laparoscopic hernia repair (30 patients) or a conventional open hernia repair (32 patients). All operations were performed while the patient was under general anesthesia to avoid anesthesia as a confounding variable.
                Postoperative pain following laparoscopic hernia repair and open hernia repair were compared using the McGill Pain Score, the McGill Visual Analogue Pain Scale score, and the number of acetaminophen with 30-mg codeine sulfate (Tylenol 3) tablets needed for pain during the first and second 24-hour periods postoperatively. All of the patients were interviewed and the postoperative pain was evaluated by a special study nurse (P.M.L.) who was blinded to the repair technique.
                At 24 hours, the patients with laparoscopic hernia repair had 26% less pain by the McGill Pain Score (P = .02) and 31% less pain by the McGill Visual Analogue Scale (P = .006) than those who underwent an open hernia repair. At 48 hours the patients who underwent laparoscopic hernia repair had 28% less pain by the McGill Pain Score (P = .03), 42% less pain by the McGill Visual Analogue Scale (P = .002), and used 42% fewer analgesic tablets (P = .004).
                Patients with a laparoscopic hernia repair had significantly less pain postoperatively than those with standard open hernia repairs. Repair of a groin hernia is one of the most common elective operations performed in general surgery. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic repair with open repair of groin hernia.
                928 patients with groin hernia, from 26 hospitals in the UK and Ireland, were randomly assigned to laparoscopic repair (n=468) or to open hernia repair (n=460, of which 433 were tension-free mesh repairs). Patients were clinically assessed at 1 week and 1 year after surgery, and were sent questionnaires at 3 months and 1 year. The primary endpoints were: complications; return to usual activities of social life (as the most generally applicable example of return to usual activities); hernia recurrence; groin pain that persisted at 1 year; and costs to the health services. All analyses were by intention to treat.
                At 1 week, at least one complication was found in 108 (29.9%) patients allocated to laparoscopic repair and in 155 (43.5%) patients allocated to open repair (95% CI for difference -20.6% to -6.6%, p<0.001). There were three serious surgical complications all of which occurred in the laparoscopic group. Patients in the laparoscopic group returned to the usual activities of social life sooner than the patients in the open repair group (10 [IQR 7-21] vs 14 [7-28] days, p=0.004). At 1 year after the operation, the laparoscopic group had a lower rate of persistent groin pain than those who had open repair (28.7% vs 36.7% [95% CI for difference -14.7% to -1.4%], p=0.018). However, all seven hernia recurrences occurred in the laparoscopic group and not in the open repair group (1.9% vs 0.0% [95% CI for difference 0.5% to 3.4%], p=0.017).
                Although laparoscopic hernia repair has advantages for patients, concerns about safety indicate that open repair is the more appropriate option for the general surgeon. Our findings lend support to the move towards laparoscopic hernia surgery becoming part of the domain of specialist surgeons. Inguinal hernias can be repaired by laparoscopic techniques, which have had better results than open surgery in several small studies.
                We performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernias were treated by extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior repair. We recorded information about postoperative recovery and complications and examined the patients for recurrences one and six weeks, six months, and one and two years after surgery.
                Six patients in the open-surgery group but none in the laparoscopic-surgery group had wound abscesses (P=0.03), and the patients in the laparoscopic-surgery group had a more rapid recovery (median time to the resumption of normal daily activity, 6 vs. 10 days; time to the return to work, 14 vs. 21 days; and time to the resumption of athletic activities, 24 vs. 36 days; P<0.001 for all comparisons). With a median follow-up of 607 days, 31 patients (6 percent) in the open-surgery group had recurrences, as compared with 17 patients (3 percent) in the laparoscopic-surgery group (P=0.05). All but three of the recurrences in the latter group were within one year after surgery and were caused by surgeon-related errors. In the open-surgery group, 15 patients had recurrences during the first year, and 16 during the second year. Follow-up was complete for 97 percent of the patients.
                Patients with inguinal hernias who undergo laparoscopic repair recover more rapidly and have fewer recurrences than those who undergo open surgical repair. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a day surgery setting comparing a standardized variant of the Shouldice hernioplasty with extraperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy.
                The laparoscopic repair was technically challenging, evidenced by conversion from extraperitoneal to transabdominal repairs in 6.25% of patients. It was free from the inherent dangers of intraperitoneal laparoscopy. Surgical morbidity was low and comparable to that for patients randomized to the open repair.
                Outcome following laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy varied depending on the parameter measured. It was comparable to the open repair with respect to postoperative activity levels and the number of days required for return to work but inferior to the open repair in terms of operation time and time to hospital discharge. The extraperitoneal approach was superior to the open repair with respect to postoperative pain levels and analgesic requirements. No attempt was made to compare recurrence rates due to the short follow-up period.
                Laparoscopic extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy should not supercede conventional hernia repair until subjected to further trials with the aid of larger study populations and greater technical expertise; the results of long-term recurrence rates are awaited. Laparoscopic hernia repair has often been criticized for its high costs.
                To compare the costs of laparoscopic and open hernia repair, 40 patients were randomized for either transabdominal laparoscopic or Lichtenstein mesh repair (under local anesthesia) in a day-case surgery unit.
                Median operative times for the laparoscopic and open groups were 62 and 65 min, respectively. Postoperative pain was comparable for the two groups. The period before return to normal life was 14 days in the laparoscopic group and 21 days in the open group. The hospital costs were 2051 FIM ($1 US = 4.6 FIM) higher in the laparoscopic group, but the total costs for employed patients (including expenses due to lost work days) were lower.
                Although the Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital, the total costs for working patients are lower with the laparoscopic technique, when the cost of lost work days is factored into overall expense. To determine whether transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair can equal or surpass an established open method at an acceptable cost.
                A randomized, prospective comparison with a follow-up of 7 to 18 months (median, 10 months; planned, 5 years).
                Health maintenance organization hospital.
                One hundred patients between 20 and 70 years of age were randomized. No patient withdrew from the study after randomization.
                Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic and open tension-free repairs using a polypropylene mesh.
                Operative and discharge times, costs, recovery, and morbidity. "Return to work" was supplemented by a performance assessment using a panel of exercises.
                Operative and hospitalization times were not significantly different between the two types of repair. Patients with laparoscopic unilateral repairs returned to work faster (9 vs 17 days). At 1 week postoperatively, performance of straight-leg raises correlated well with time to return to work for patients with strenuous jobs. The laparoscopic repair was more expensive than the open approach ($3093 vs $2494).
                Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair can be accomplished with operative and hospitalization times and a short-term recurrence rate similar to those of an established open technique. Perioperative exercise testing may be an important adjunct to return to work in the comparison of methods. Between May 1994 and September 1995, 64 men were included in a randomized prospective study comparing conventional Shouldice repair (S group) and transperitoneal laparoscopic repair with polypropylene mesh (L group). Cost evaluation was divided into distinct parts: drugs, non usable surgical materials, medico-technical procedures food and employees costs. In group S, mean operating time was 56', total cost was 3,922 FF in the case of unilateral hernia and 4,808 FF and respectively 77' in the case of bilateral hernia. In group L, mean operative time was 89', total cost 8,949 FF (disposable trocars) and 7,136 FF (non-disposable trocars) in the case of unilateral hernia and 116', 9,570 FF and 7,763 FF in case of bilateral hernia. Postoperative stay was 4.2 days in group S and 4 days in group L. Return to work was 28.6 days in group L and 35.5 days in group S (ns). In conclusion laparoscopic hernia repair does not decrease post operative pain, hospital stay and return to work, but is twice as expensive. Laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is controversial and deserves critical evaluation.
                In a randomized prospective study transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (n = 24) was compared in patients to the tension-free Lichtenstein repair (n = 29) utilizing validated and reliable pain and activity assessment tools. The Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) was used to compare preoperative normal activity to postoperative activity. A Pain-O-Meter (visual analogue scale plus affective and sensory pain descriptors) assessed intensity of pain. The total pain assessment score and SIP were compared across time (postoperative day 1-42). Analgesic medication was used as a covariate.
                The total pain score was less for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy but this did not reach statistical significance. Similarly, the SIP showed modest improvement for laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. No differences between groups were noted for morphine equivalents of administered analgesics or length of hospitalization.
                Further investigation of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is warranted. Between July 1995 and June 1996, 280 patients were operated on for inguinal hernia within the scope of a prospective, randomized study. The aim of the study was to compare the Shouldice technique with tension-free hernioplasty (Lichtenstein, TAPP). The operation time was comparable in all three groups. There was less need for analgesics and postoperative morbidity was less after the tension-free technique. No severe complications such as deep wound infection or infection of the implant were seen in any of the groups. After a follow-up period of 18 months, we found two recurrences after the Shouldice operation and one recurrence in each of the tension-free groups. Treatment satisfaction after tension-free hernioplasty was high. One year after the Shouldice operation, about 10% of the patients were dissatisfied because of persistent discomfort and pain. Because of lower morbidity, less pain, and low recurrence rates after tension-free hernioplasty, we find the tension-free techniques to be superior to conventional hernioplasty. To compare outcome and costs between laparoscopic and open hernia repair.
                Prospective randomised study.
                One university and two district hospitals in Sweden.
                200 men aged 25-75 years.
                Operating time, hospital stay, complications, and time to recovery. A cost-minimisation-analysis was used in which the total costs were calculated for a defined period of time for each option.
                The one year follow-up rate was 98%. Mean (SD) operation times in the laparoscopic and open groups were 72 (30) and 62 (25) minutes, respectively (p = 0.009). Hospital stay and complication rates did not differ between the groups. Among employees the mean (SD) periods off work in the laparoscopic and open groups were 10 (8) and 23 (21) days, respectively (p = 0.0001). The mean direct costs of the laparoscopic operation were increased by SEK 4037 (US$ 483) but the savings in indirect costs resulting from earlier return to work were SEK 11392 (US$ 1364).
                Laparoscopic hernia repair gave the employed patients faster recovery and return to work, and was the most cost-effective strategy provided that both direct and indirect costs were included. In a prospective randomized study postoperative pain, analgesic consumption, return to physical activity and work, cosmetic result and experience with the type of operation were assessed in 86 patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair by means of either the Shouldice technique (n = 34), the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) (n = 28) or total preperitoneal (TPP) (n = 24) repair. Patients having TAPP repair had decreased visual analogue scale scores for pain on the day of operation compared with those undergoing TPP and Shouldice repair (4.8 versus 6.5 and 6.2 respectively, P = 0.02) and on the first postoperative day compared with TPP (4.0 versus 6.0, P = 0.01). There was no difference between the three groups for days 2, 3, 4, 5 and 30 after operation. Patient satisfaction with the operation, analgesic consumption, return to physical activity such as walking, driving, climbing stairs, running, bicycling and sexual intercourse, as well as return to work, was comparable in the three groups. There was a better cosmetic result after TAPP and TPP repair. This study failed to demonstrate significant benefits from laparoscopic hernia repair over the Shouldice technique. Giant prosthetic reinforcement of the visceral sac (GPRVS), an open preperitoneal mesh repair, is a very effective groin hernia repair. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP), based on the same principle, is expected to combine low recurrence rates with minimal postoperation morbidity.
                Seventy-nine patients with 93 recurrent and 15 concomitant primary inguinal hernias were randomized between GPRVS (37 patients) and TAPP (42 patients). Operating time, complications, pain, analgesia use, disability period, and recurrences were recorded.
                Mean operating time was 56 min with GPRVS versus 79 min with TAPP (p < 0. 001). Most complications were minor, except for a pulmonary embolus and an ileus, both after GPRVS. Patients experienced less pain after a laparoscopic repair. Average disability period was 23 days with GPRVS versus 13 days with TAPP (p = 0.03) for work, and 29 versus 21 days, respectively (p = 0.07) for physical activities. Recurrence rates at a mean follow-up of 34 months were 1 in 52 (1.9%) for GPRVS versus 7 in 56 (12.5%) for TAPP (p = 0.04). Hospital costs in U.S. dollars were comparable, with GPRVS at $1,150 and TAPP at $1,179.
                Laparoscopic repair of recurrent inguinal hernia has a lower morbidity than GPRVS. However, laparoscopic repair is a difficult operation, and the potential technical failure rate is higher. With regard to recurrence rates, the open preperitoneal prosthetic mesh repair remains the best repair. Laparoscopic surgery benefits patients because it reduces pain and enables earlier mobilisation. There is concern that laparoscopic hernia repair may enter surgical practice without proper evaluation. We have done a randomised, prospective study comparing laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair performed under day-case general anaesthesia. 150 patients were randomised to have laparoscopic (group L) or open (group O) herniorrhaphy. Group L underwent transabdominal stapling of preperitoneal Prolene mesh. Group O underwent open repair, with a tension-free nylon darn. Postoperatively patients completed pain analogue scales eight times over 7 days, and use of analgesia was recorded. Time of return to normal domestic activity and to work was assessed. The groups were similar in age, sex, and body surface area. Self-administered co-proxamol was a median of 18 tablets (1 tablet = 325 mg) in group O (n = 75) and 6 in group L (n = 75, p < 0.001). Overall mean pain analogue score was 3.1 (SD 1.8, n = 70) in group O and 1.8 (SD 1.1, n = 71) in group L (p < 0.0001). Return to normal domestic activity was a median of 7 days in group O (n = 72) and 3 days in group L (n = 73) (p < 0.001). Return to work was a median of 28 days in group O (n = 39) and 14 days in group L (n = 40) (p < 0.002). These data suggest that laparoscopic hernia repair induces less pain than open hernia repair, and enables patients to return to normal activity and work more quickly. To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic.
                A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias.
                Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996.
                400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group. Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs.
                More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (chi2 = 6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was 335 pounds (95% confidence interval 228 pounds to 441 pounds) more than the cost of open repair.
                This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive. Between October 1992 and September 1994, 70 patients presenting with primary unilateral hernia were randomly assigned to either a transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic (group L) repair (n = 35) with a 3 x 5 inch polypropylene mesh or a conventional Shouldice repair (group S) (n = 35). The series consisted of 60 men and 10 women, with a median age of 56 years and a BMI of 24. We used the Nyhus classification; there were 25 type 2, 24 type 3a and 21 type 3b hernias. Preoperative characteristics of both groups were equivalent. When comparing group L to group S, we noted a similar operative time (65 +/- 20 min) and a similar postoperative hospital stay (3.8 +/- 1.3 days). The postoperative pain that was evaluated on a visual analogue scale (score from 0 to 10) was lower in group L. On the first and third postoperative day, the mean score was 3.4 +/- 1.5 and 1.3 +/- 1.4 in (group L compared) to 5.3 +/- 1.9 (p < 0.001) and 2.8 +/- 1.8 (p < 0.005) in group S. Significant morbidity occurred in 7 patients of group L: 3 seromas and 4 cases of orchitis, and in 5 patients of group S: 1 wound abcess, 2 cases of chronic neuralgia and 2 cases of orchitis. We recorded a quicker return to home activities in group L: 6 +/- 2 versus 10 +/- 4 days (p < 0.05) in group S but time off work was similar in both groups (30 +/- 9 days). All patients were evaluated in April 1996: the median follow-up was 30 months (range: 19-42 months). We recorded 1 recurrence in group L and 3 in group S. Statistical analysis revealed that the recurrence rate, for patients older than 50 and presenting with type 3 hernia, was higher in group S (3/14 = 21%) than in group L (0/13 = 0%). In conclusion, compared to Shouldice repair, laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is associated with less postoperative pain, a quicker return to everyday activities and an equivalent postoperative morbidity. In our series, the recurrence rate was even lower for patients older than 50 with type 3 hernia. The role of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is controversial. The aim of this study was to find out whether it is justified to switch from the predominantly modified Bassini repair which the authors had been using to laparoscopic repair.
                Randomized controlled trial in 120 eligible patients admitted for elective hernia repair in a university hospital.
                Sixty patients underwent laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh repair; the other 60 patients had an open repair, mostly with the modified Bassini technique. Operative time for laparoscopic repair was significantly longer, mean (s.d.) 95 (28) min vs 67 (27) min (p < 0.001). The mean analogue pain score during the first 24 h after surgery was 36.2 (20.2) in the laparoscopic group and 49.3 (24.9) in the open group (p = 0.006). The requirement for narcotic injections and postoperative disability in walking 10 m and getting out of bed were also significantly less following laparoscopic repair. The postoperative hospital stay was not significantly different, mean 2.6 (1.2) days for laparoscopic repair and 3.0 (1.5) days for open repair (p = 0.1). Patients were able to perform light activities without pain or discomfort sooner after laparoscopic repair, median interquartile range 8 (5-14) days vs 14 (8-19) days (p = 0.013). Patients also resumed heavy activities sooner, but not significantly, after laparoscopic repair, median 28 (17-60) days vs 35 (20-56) days (p = 0.25). The return to work was not significantly different, median 14 (8-25) days after laparoscopic repair and 15 (11-21) days after open repair (p = 0.14). After a mean follow-up of 32 months one patient developed a recurrent hernia 3 months after a laparoscopic repair. Laparoscopic repair was more costly than open repair by approximately $400.
                Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with less early postoperative pain and disability and earlier return to full activities than open repair, but there were no benefits regarding postoperative hospital stay and return to work; laparoscopic repair was also more costly. To compare the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) and the open Lichtenstein technique, in 1992 a prospective randomized trial was initiated. Until 1995 108 patients with 130 hernias took part in the trial: 64 TAPP (group A) and 66 Lichtenstein (group B). 22 patients had simultaneous bilateral repairs. Laparoscopic approach (group A) was able to expose otherwise-occult controlateral hernias in 3 cases and discovered a complex hernia (a hernia with more than one defect in the wall) in 2 patient in whom a direct hernia had been diagnosed before the operation. Mean operating time for monolateral operations was significantly longer in group A (p < 0.05). The corresponding figures for bilateral operations were longer in group B (p < 0.01). No intraoperative complications, conversions from TAPP to open repair, postoperative deaths. There were not less pain quicker mobility and shorter period of disability in the laparoscopic group (group A). Ten (15.6%) postoperative complications occurred in group A: local hematoma (6 cases, 9.3%), neuralgias (3 cases, 4.7%), urinary retention (1 case, 1.6%). Eight (12.1%) postoperative complications: hematomas (3 cases, 4.5%), urinary retention (3 cases, 4.5%), neuralgias (2 cases, 3%) occurred in group B. Differences were not significant. The current follow-up period is 36 months (15-54) in median. In both groups no recurrences occurred, but 3 patients in group B who were operated on for monolateral hernia (6.5%) discovered to be affected by contralateral hernia. The results of the present report suggest that TAPP does not appear to be associated with better results in terms of complications, pain or period of disability as compared to open tension free hernia repair, but the ability of the laparoscopic approach to expose otherwise-occult defects eliminated the risk of recurrences due to missed hernias. The aim of the study was prospectively to compare the early results and outcome in 105 patients randomly allocated to undergo tension-free laparoscopic hernia repair (LHR) with transabdominal preperitoneal technique (53 patients) or open hernia repair (OHR) with mesh apposition (52 patients). The mean (SD) operation time was longer in the LHR group than in the OHR group: 49.6 (5.4) versus 33. 9 (6.2) minutes; p < 0.001. One laparoscopic case was converted to open repair to deal with a hemorrhage from an aberrant obturatory artery at the level of Cooper's ligament. Groin discomfort or pain was the most common complication after both procedures. The patients requiring none, one, two, or more than two doses of intramuscular diclofenac were, respectively, 40.4%, 40.4%, 15.4%, and 3.8% after LHR and 50.0%, 30.8%, 17.3%, and 1.9% after OHR (p = 0.69; NS). The mean +/- SEM (range) postoperative visual analog scale score, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), was 3.1 +/- 0.2 (1-7) in the LHR subset and 2.7 +/- 0.2 (1-5) in the OHR group (p = 0.14; NS); on the second postoperative day the score was 2.3 +/- 0.2 (1-6) and 1.8 +/- 0.1 (1-4), respectively (p < 0.03). The time +/- SEM (range) of resumption of pain-free normal activities and work was faster in OHR group: 6.1 +/- 0.2 (4-8) weeks versus 6.5 +/- 0.1 (4-8) weeks; p < 0.03. Our results showed that tension-free open hernia repair is superior to LHR in terms of postoperative pain with no important differences in recovery. </HEA Benefits of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy (LH) over open hernia repair (OH) remain unproved.
                Interim analysis of a prospective randomized controlled trial compared OH with LH where study outcomes were measured by third-party evaluators through patient interviews.
                Both groups were well matched for all baseline parameters, although LH patients anticipated a quicker postoperative recovery than OH (p = 0.014). No significant difference was noted in operating time or surgeon operative satisfaction. The median duration of hospital stay was 1 day in both groups; LH patients made use of significantly less postoperative narcotics than OH (p = 0.02). No difference was observed in the durations of convalescence (LH, 9.6 +/- 7.6 days; OH, 10.9 +/- 7.4 days). Greater improvements in quality of life were exhibited in LH patients than OH patients 1 month after operation (p = 0.035), with one of the two measures used. A greater percentage of LH patients seemed "very satisfied with their operation" (p = 0.07). Complication rates were similar, and a single recurrence, in a patient in the OH group, has been observed after a median follow-up of 14 months.
                Direct cost measurements showed LH to be 40% more expensive than OH in the context of a Canadian-type health care system. To date, benefits in postoperative pain and possibly quality of life have been detected in the LH group. To evaluate the influence of the laparoscopic technique in hernia repair regarding time to full recovery and return to work, complications, recurrence rate, and economic aspects.
                Several studies have shown advantages in terms of less pain and faster recovery after laparoscopic hernia repair, whereas others have not, and the cost-effectiveness has been questioned. The laparoscopic technique must be thoroughly compared with the open procedures before its true place in hernia surgery can be defined.
                Six hundred thirteen male patients aged 40 to 75 years were randomized to the conventional procedure, preperitoneal mesh placed by the open technique, or laparoscopic preperitoneal mesh (TAPP). Follow-up was after 7 days, 8 weeks, and 1 year.
                Of 613 patients undergoing surgery, 604 (98.5%) were followed for 1 year. Patients who underwent TAPP gained full recovery after 18.4 days, compared with 24.2 days for open mesh (p < 0.001) and 26.4 days for the conventional procedure (p < 0.001). Patients who underwent TAPP returned to work after 14.7 days, compared with 17.7 days for open mesh (p = 0.05) and 17.9 days for the conventional procedure (p = 0.04). They also had significantly less restriction in physical activities after 7 days. The TAPP procedure was more expensive, mainly as a result of longer surgical time and equipment costs, even after compensation for earlier return to work. Complications were more common in the TAPP group, with a varying pattern between the groups. Four recurrences in the conventional, 11 in the open mesh, and 4 in the TAPP group were recorded after 1 year (p = n.s.).
                The laparoscopic technique results in both shorter time to full recovery and shorter time to return to work, at the price of substantially increased costs. To establish the safety, short term outcome, and theatre costs of transabdominal laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia performed as day surgery.
                Randomised controlled trial. The control operation was the two layer modified Maloney darn.
                Teaching hospital and district general hospital.
                125 men randomised to laparoscopic or open repair of inguinal hernia.
                Morbidity, postoperative pain and use of analgesics, quality of life, and theatre costs. Outcome was assessed by questionnaires administered to patients daily for 10 days and at six weeks postoperatively and by outpatient review at six weeks. Return to normal activity was assessed by questionnaire at three months.
                One vascular complication (2%) occurred in the group that had open repair. Seven complications (12%) including vessel injury and early recurrence arose in the group that had laparoscopic repair (difference in complication rate 10% (95% confidence interval 4% to 18%; P = 0.02). Pain scores and quality of life assessed by the short form 36 showed a significant benefit to the group that had laparoscopic repair in the early postoperative period. Return to normal activity was not significantly different between the two groups. Total theatre costs were higher in the group that had laparoscopic repair (mean cost for laparoscopic repair 850 pounds (622 pounds to 1078 pounds); mean cost for open repair 268 pounds (245 pounds to 292 pounds)).
                Because of the greater complication rate and higher theatre costs for laparoscopic repair and the patient outcome preferences expressed, the results of larger trials of clinical and cost effectiveness using recurrence as the primary outcome measure should be known before laparoscopic herniorrhaphy is widely adopted. The aim of this prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair with a standard tension-free open mesh repair (open).
                A total of 108 low-risk patients with unilateral (primary or recurrent) or bilateral hernias were randomized to TAPP (group 1 = 52 cases) or open (group 2 = 56 cases). The outcome measures included operating time, complications, postoperative pain, return to normal activity, operating theater costs, and recurrences.
                The mean operative time was longer for the TAPP than for the open group only in unilateral primary hernias. At rest, the median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score was higher for group 1 than group 2 at 48 h postoperatively. Mild to discomforting pain in the inguinal region after 7 days, night pain after 30 days, and inguinal hardening after 3 months were more frequent in group 2 than group 1. No significant differences were observed in return to normal activities between the groups. One hernia recurrence was observed after 1 month in group 1. TAPP was significantly more expensive than open.
                TAPP was associated with less postoperative pain than open. The increase in operating theater costs, however, was dramatic and was not compensated by shorter time away from work. TAPP should not be adopted routinely unless its costs can be drastically reduced. Laparoscopic hernia operations have been criticized in regard to their high hospital costs. This study was designed to compare the costs and some outcome features of totally extraperitoneal endoscopic hernia operation (TEP) and Lichtenstein mesh repair (OPN) among 45 randomized employed patients. The medians of operative time in the TEP and OPN groups were 67.5 and 53 min, respectively. Return to normal life was 14 days in the TEP group and 20 days in the OPN group. The hospital costs per patient were $1,239 (all costs are in US dollars) in the TEP group and $782 in the OPN group. The median total costs were $3,912 and $4,661 in the TEP and OPN groups, respectively. The Lichtenstein operation is cheaper for the hospital. The total costs for working patients are lower with the endoscopic technique because fewer working days are lost. In February 1993 a prospective randomized multicenter trial was initiated to compare laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty to Shouldice herniorrhaphy as performed by surgeons of nonspecialized clinics.
                Until January 1994, 87 patients with 108 hernias took part in the trial (43 Shouldice and 44 laparoscopic repairs).
                The laparoscopic procedure took significantly longer than did the open operation but caused less pain as measured by pain analogue score and consumption of paracetamol and narcotics. The postoperative complication rate was 26% in the open and 16% in the laparoscopic group. The patients in the laparoscopic group were discharged earlier and their convalescence was shorter than after open hernia repair. There has been one early recurrence in the laparoscopic and two in the open group to date with a mean follow-up of 201 days.
                Laparoscopic hernia repair causes less pain than the conventional operation and enables the patient to return to full work and usual activities earlier. The recurrence rate will not be known for 5 years. Laparoscopic herniorraphies have been used to reduce the pain and convalescence associated with open approaches. However, there is still not any consensus of the best approach. We compared open preperitoneal and laparoscopic total extraperitoneal approaches in groin hernia repair.
                Thirty-two patients underwent open preperitoneal herniorraphy (Group I) and other 32 patients underwent total extraperitoneal repair (Group II). Time of surgery was noted. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was applied to evaluate the postoperative pain intensity.
                Operation time was 35 (20-65) minutes in Group I and 58 (40-85) minutes in Group II (p < 0.05). The difference of complication ratios between two groups was not significant. Laparoscopic approach was associated with less pain within postoperative 24 hours as compared to the open technique. However, after the first postoperative day, there was no longer statistically significant difference between both groups. No recurrence has yet been seen in follow-up period of 15 (4-24) months.
                Laparoscopic herniorraphy is associated with better results in term of postoperative pain within the first 24 hours as compared to open technique. To compare the effectiveness of open and laparoscopic primary inguinal hernia repair.
                Randomised controlled trial.
                University hospital, The Netherlands.
                87 patients had 103 open repairs and 88 patients had 114 laparoscopic repairs between November 1993 and July 1995.
                Laparoscopic repair by the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique and open repair by the Bassini technique.
                Recurrence, morbidity, pain, and duration of convalescence.
                Operating time was longer for laparoscopy (mean (SD): 82 (28) compared with 45 (15) minutes p < 0.001). Patients in the Bassini group had higher postoperative pain scores (mean (SD)VAS: 2.9 (1.6) compared with 2.0 (1.6) p=0.002), used more analgesics (median total intake: 2 (0-54) compared with 0 tablets (0-42) p=0.008), and needed a longer convalescence time (mean (SD) time to return to work: 22 (12.6) compared with 14 (10.1) days p < 0.001; mean (SD) time to return to physical activities: 27 (12.6) compared with 17 (12.2) days p < 0.001). Mean follow up was 24 months. Recurrence rates were 21% (22/ 103) after Bassini and 6% (7/114) after laparoscopic repair (p=0.001).
                Laparoscopic hernia repair is a safe operation, which has obvious advantages over the Bassini repair in terms of pain, use of analgesic drugs, resumption of activities, and recurrence. A disadvantage of the laparoscopic repair is the longer operating time. Before choosing between open and laparoscopic preperitoneal tension-free repair, a study comparing their safety and short-term outcome was needed. No randomised studies comparing the two hernia repair techniques have hitherto been published.
                A prospective randomised study was carried out comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 24) to open preperitoneal mesh herniorrhaphy (n = 25).
                When comparing unilateral repairs, the mean operation time was significantly (P < 0.01) shorter in the open group (55 min) than in the laparoscopic group (66 min). Pain on movement (P < 0.05) and pain on coughing (P < 0.01) receded more rapidly in the laparoscopic group. The median time before return to work or normal activity was 7 days (range 1-60) in laparoscopic and 5 days (1-30) in open repair. There were five (21%) complications associated with the laparoscopic procedure, while the open procedure resulted in two (8%) complications. After a median follow-up of 18 months the recurrence rate in the laparoscopic group was 13% and in the open group 8%.
                In this study the open method was associated with fewer complications and recurrences than the laparoscopic technique. Despite the decreased postoperative discomfort after laparoscopic repair, there was no significant difference in median time before return to work or normal activity. These results together with the higher cost of the laparoscopic procedure suggest that the open method is more suitable at least for unilateral hernias. To evaluate the merits of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LHR) compared to conventional open hernia repair (OHR) a randomized study has been conducted. All patients were day surgical cases, of which 44 were randomized to a standardized OHR under local anesthetic (LA) and 42 to an LHR under general anesthesia (GA). Fifteen LHR patients had bilateral repairs. Operative time for OHR was 30.5 min, for unilateral LHR 35 min, and for bilateral LHR 60 min. OHR patients were discharged after a median of 134.5 min, which was significantly shorter than LHR patients, whose median discharge was 225 min (P < 0.01). Pain scores, activity levels, analgesia requirements, and time taken to return to work were not significantly different following surgery in either group (P < 0.05). There have been two recurrent hernias and one small bowel obstruction in the LHR group. We conclude that both repairs can be successfully performed as day surgical procedures. The added cost of LHR at this stage does not warrant its widespread use in unilateral hernia repairs. Which procedure is adopted should be individualized; however, patients with bilateral hernias on presentation can be successfully managed as day cases, obviating the need for hospitalization or two operations.
The review showed that laparoscopic repair takes longer and has a more serious complication rate in respect of visceral (especially bladder) and vascular injuries, but recovery is quicker with less persisting pain and numbness. Reduced hernia recurrence of around 30-50% was related to the use of mesh rather than the method of mesh placement.