Effect of treatment with simvastatin on serum cholesteryl ester transfer in patients on dialysis. PERFECT Study Collaborative Group. Effects of atorvastatin and vitamin E on lipoproteins and oxidative stress in dialysis patients: a randomised-controlled trial. First United Kingdom Heart and Renal Protection (UK-HARP-I) study: biochemical efficacy and safety of simvastatin and safety of low-dose aspirin in chronic kidney disease. Effects of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol phenotype and C-reactive protein levels in patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Safety and efficacy of simvastatin in hypercholesterolemic patients undergoing chronic renal dialysis. Fluvastatin prevents development of arterial stiffness in haemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Lipid and apoprotein changes during atorvastatin up-titration in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia: a placebo-controlled study. Clinical investigation on the hypolipidemic effect of simvastatin versus probucol in hemodialysis patients. A randomized trial of the effect of statin and fibrate therapy on arterial function in CKD. Effects of simvastatin on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and serum albumin in hemodialysis patients. Atorvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing hemodialysis. Effects of atorvastatin on Lp(a) and lipoprotein profiles in hemodialysis patients. Low-dose atorvastatin in severe chronic kidney disease patients: a randomized, controlled endpoint study. A placebo-controlled trial examining atorvastatin in dyslipidemic patients undergoing CAPD.
Plasma cholesteryl ester transfer activity is increased in patients with chronic renal failure on dialysis who have elevated levels of apolipoprotein B (apoB)-containing lipoproteins. Simvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor, reduces levels of these lipoproteins but the effect of treatment on cholesteryl ester transfer activity in patients on dialysis remains to be determined.
                We measured serum newly synthesized cholesteryl ester transfer (NCET) activity, lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) activity and serum lipid, lipoprotein and apolipoprotein concentrations before and immediately after 6 months treatment with simvastatin (10 mg daily, n = 24) or placebo (n = 29) in 53 patients with chronic renal failure receiving haemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).
                Simvastatin therapy significantly reduced serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apoB concentrations, and both NCET (P = 0.001) and LCAT (P = 0.012) rates. The decrease in NCET activity was correlated significantly with the corresponding decrease in apoB concentration (r = 0.715, P < 0.001) and LCAT activity (r = 0.715, P < 0.001) during simvastatin therapy and was no longer significant when apoB concentration (P = 0.14) or LCAT activity (P = 0.07) were controlled.
                These data show that simvastatin therapy reduces serum NCET rates, and suggest that this may be linked to the concomitant decrease in levels of apoB-containing lipoproteins which are acceptors of transferred cholesteryl esters, and to the decrease in serum LCAT rates in patients with chronic renal failure with treatment. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of treatment with atorvastatin, alpha-tocopherol and the combination of both, on lipoproteins and oxidative stress in dialysis patients.
                This double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial was performed at the dialysis department of a non-university hospital. SUBJECTS, INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: A total of 44 clinically stable, non-diabetic patients on dialysis therapy (23 on haemo- and 21 on peritoneal-dialysis) without manifest cardiovascular disease were included in this study. They were randomised for treatment during a period of 12 weeks with 40 mg atorvastatin + placebo alpha-tocopherol (group 1) once daily, 800 IU alpha-tocopherol + placebo atorvastatin once daily (group 2), 40 mg atorvastatin + 800 IU alpha-tocopherol once daily (group 3), or placebo atorvastatin + placebo alpha-tocopherol once daily (group 4). Assessment of lipid profile and oxidative stress was performed at the start of the study and after 12 weeks of treatment.
                Treatment with atorvastatin reduced total cholesterol, triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, apolipoprotein B (apoB) and levels of oxidised LDL (oxLDL) with 30-43%. It had no influence on LDL oxidisability. Additional supplementation with alpha-tocopherol had no effect on lipid profile and oxLDL levels but decreased in vitro LDL oxidisability. No side-effects were observed.
                Treatment with atorvastatin is effective in lowering plasma total cholesterol, TG, LDL, apoB and oxLDL in a population of stable dialysis patients and might therefore be an effective tool in improving the poor cardiovascular outcome in these patients. Supplementation of alpha-tocopherol to atorvastatin had beneficial effects on in vitro LDL oxidisability and might therefore be of additional value. Further research on the clinical effects of treatment with atorvastatin in combination with alpha-tocopherol is necessary. Patients with chronic kidney disease are at increased risk for cardiovascular disease, but the efficacy and safety of simvastatin and aspirin are unknown in this patient group.
                Patients were randomly assigned in a 2 x 2 factorial design to the administration of: (1) 20 mg of simvastatin daily versus matching placebo, and (2) 100 mg of modified-release aspirin daily versus matching placebo.
                Overall, 448 patients with chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned (242 predialysis patients with a creatinine level > or = 1.7 mg/dL [> or =150 micromol/L], 73 patients on dialysis therapy, and 133 patients with a functioning transplant). Compliance with study treatments was 80% at 12 months. Allocation to treatment with 100 mg of aspirin daily was not associated with an excess of major bleeds (aspirin, 4 of 225 patients [2%] versus placebo, 6 of 223 patients [3%]; P = not significant [NS]), although there was a 3-fold excess of minor bleeds (34 of 225 [15%] versus 12 of 223 patients [5%]; P = 0.001). Among those with predialysis renal failure or a functioning transplant at baseline, aspirin did not increase the number of patients who progressed to dialysis therapy (7 of 187 [4%] versus 6 of 188 patients [3%]; P = NS) or experienced a greater than 20% increase in creatinine level (63 of 187 patients [34%] versus 56 of 188 patients [30%]; P = NS). After 12 months of follow-up, allocation to 20 mg of simvastatin daily reduced nonfasting total cholesterol levels by 18% (simvastatin, 163 mg/dL [4.22 mmol/L] versus placebo, 196 mg/dL [5.08 mmol/L]; P < 0.0001), directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 24% (89 mg/dL [2.31 mmol/L] versus 114 mg/dL [2.96 mmol/L]; P < 0.0001), and triglyceride levels by 13% (166 mg/dL [1.87 mmol/L] versus 186 mg/dL [2.10 mmol/L]; P < 0.01), but there was no significant effect on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (2% increase; P = NS). Allocation to simvastatin therapy was not associated with excess risk for abnormal liver function test results or elevated creatine kinase levels.
                During a 1-year treatment period, simvastatin, 20 mg/d, produced a sustained reduction of approximately one quarter in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, with no evidence of toxicity, and aspirin, 100 mg/d, did not substantially increase the risk for a major bleeding episode. Much larger trials are now needed to assess whether these treatments can prevent vascular events. To determine the effects of atorvastatin on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) particle size and C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations in patients undergoing long-term hemodialysis. Another objective was to compare the effects of atorvastatin on lipoprotein profiles as determined by direct versus indirect assessment of lipoprotein composition.
                Randomized, parallel-group substudy.
                Two university-affiliated outpatient hemodialysis centers.
                Nineteen patients with LDL levels above 100 mg/dl and with at least two cardiovascular risk factors.
                Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to atorvastatin 10 mg/day or no treatment (control) for 20 weeks.
                We compared the differences between LDL particle size and CRP levels at baseline and 20 weeks in the atorvastatin versus control groups. Baseline demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. Atorvastatin therapy was associated with no change in mean LDL particle size (p=0.23) and with a 90% decrease in mean CRP level (p=0.52). When evaluated by standard chemical analysis, atorvastatin therapy reduced total cholesterol levels by 29% (p=0.025) and resulted in nonsignificant reductions in LDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride levels. Treatment with atorvastatin was not associated with significant changes in lipoprotein profile as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.
                Treatment with atorvastatin did not affect LDL particle size but was associated with a sizable, yet nonsignificant, reduction in CRP concentrations. The drug had variable effects on lipoprotein concentrations as determined by chemical and NMR analytical methods. A larger study is necessary to provide definitive information on the effects of atorvastatin on LDL phenotype and CRP in patients with kidney disease. Dyslipidemia is universal but hypercholesterolemia per se is present in around 50% of dialysis patients. Although dietary therapy is of benefit in some, the majority require drug therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of simvastatin plus an optimized lipid-lowering dialysis diet with placebo plus diet in a randomized, double-blind trial stratified for dialysis modality. Patients treated with hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) for at least 9 months and with serum non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol greater than 135 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) greater than 116 mg/dL, and triglyceride less than 600 mg/dL after a 6-week dietary treatment phase and an 8-week diet plus placebo run-in phase, were enrolled in the 24-week double-blind treatment phase. Fifty-seven patients (16 men, 41 women, median age 63 years, range 22-75 yr) were randomized 2:1 to diet plus 5 mg/day simvastatin (n = 38: 22 HD, 16 CAPD) or diet plus placebo (n = 19: 12 HD, 7 CAPD) for 24 weeks. Dose was doubled bimonthly (maximum 20 mg/day) if non-HDL cholesterol was greater than 135 mg/dL. Forty-two patients (73.7%) completed the trial. Comparing baseline and 24 weeks, simvastatin (median 10 mg/day) was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing serum non-HDL cholesterol concentrations. For HD, the median percentage changes for total cholesterol (TC) (simvastatin versus placebo) were -21.4% and -12.1% (P = 0.011), respectively; for LDL cholesterol, -33.0% and -8.8% (P = 0.023); for non-HDL cholesterol, -25.2% and -14.0% (P = 0.008); and for TC:HDL, -17.65% and -1.67% (P = 0.008). For CAPD, changes for TC were -22.1% and -1.5% (P = 0.003), respectively; for LDL, -36.4% and 0.0% (P = 0.001); for non-HDL cholesterol, -24.9% and -3.6% (P = 0.002); and for TC:HDL ratio, -21.49% and +9.74% (P = 0.045). Changes with CAPD in apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 were -4.7% and +4.0% (P = 0.031); and for ApoB, -19.9% and +2.6%, respectively (P = 0.031). There were no significant changes in ApoA1 or ApoB with HD. Compared with placebo, triglyceride levels fell 10.2% with HD and 6.2% with CAPD. HDL cholesterol was unchanged with HD but rose 8.5% with CAPD. These trends, however, did not reach statistical significance (P > 0.05). There was no effect on Lp (a). The incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse experiences were not increased in the simvastatin-treated patients compared with placebo. Simvastatin appears to be a safe and effective treatment for the reduction of serum non-HDL cholesterol levels in both HD and, particularly, CAPD patients.
                Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Arterial stiffness assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV) predicts all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. We studied the preventive effects of a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, fluvastatin, on arterial PWV values in this population.
                Twenty-two patients with normal serum lipid levels received fluvastatin (20 mg/day p.o.) or a placebo for 6 months. Their serum lipid levels, serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), arterial PWV, and ankle brachial indexes (ABI) were determined before, and 3 and 6 months after taking the medication to evaluate arterial stiffness.
                At the beginning of the follow-up, there were no differences in age, blood pressure, body mass index, serum haemoglobin A1c level, serum CRP level, serum lipid levels, PWV or ABI between the placebo- (n=10) and the fluvastatin-treated patients (n=12). After 6 months, the PWV and the serum oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level increased significantly (from 1969+/-140 to 2326+/-190 cm/s and 70.4+/-13.8 to 91.8+/-15.5 U/l, respectively) in the placebo-treated patients. However, the fluvastatin group had a significantly reduced PWV (from 1991+/-162 to 1709+/-134 cm/s), oxidized LDL-C serum levels (from 89.0+/-9.6 to 73.0+/-5.8 U/l) and CRP serum levels (from 0.97+/-0.32 to 0.26+/-0.16 mg/dl) compared with those in the placebo group.
                Long-term administration of fluvastatin prevents further worsening of arterial biomechanics in haemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, even in the presence of serum lipid levels in the normal range. Patients with end-stage renal disease commonly present with an atherogenic lipid profile characterized by the accumulation of triglyceride-rich, apoprotein B-containing "remnant" lipoproteins, small dense low-density lipoprotein, and low levels of high-density lipoprotein. They are at increased cardiovascular risk and may benefit from drastic lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin, a potent, broadacting lipid regulator. This study aims to assess the effects of atorvastatin on the lipid profile in hemodialysis patients, to determine wether atorvastatin is also effective at lowering lipid levels in this particular high-risk subgroup.
                In this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study in hemodialysis patients with hypercholesterolemia (n = 42, mean total cholesterol 243 +/- 33 mg/dl (6.3 +/- 0.8 mmol/l)), the efficacy of 4-weekly increasing doses of atorvastatin (10 - 40 mg daily) was investigated. Lipids and apoproteins were measured in plasma and isolated lipoprotein fractions.
                Mean total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol progressively decreased with increasing doses of atorvastatin (total cholesterol -33%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol -43% after 12 weeks), while high-density lipoprotein cholesterol remained unchanged. Plasma levels of apoprotein B and apoprotein E were also significantly reduced by atorvastatin 10 mg, while up-titration to 20 and 40 mg daily provided additional benefits by lowering triglycerides and apoprotein C-III. At week 12, the fraction of small dense low-density lipoprotein was significantly reduced from 23% - 18%, and apoprotein B-containing intermediate-density lipoproteins were no longer detectable.
                In conclusion, atorvastatin not only treated hypercholesterolemia but also favorably affected the uremic lipid profile in patients on hemodialysis. Atorvastatin 4-weekly dose escalation up to 40 mg daily was well-tolerated. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the impact of this improved lipid profile on morbidity and mortality. In chronic renal failure hypertriglyceridemia is a well-known complication that persists during hemodialysis treatment: it may be one of the major risk factor for cardiovascular death in these patients. We studied the effects of two lipid lowering drugs; simvastatin (20 mg/day for six months) and probucol (500 mg/day for six months), on lipid profile in 12 hemodialysis patients. Simvastatin therapy reduced plasma total cholesterol by 26% (p > 0.002), LDL-cholesterol by 36% (p > 0.002) and triglycerides by 28% (p > 0.05): plasma HDL-cholesterol and apo-A were raised, but not significantly. Probucol therapy decreased plasma triglycerides by 38% (p > 0.05), total cholesterol by 15% and LDL-cholesterol by 19%: plasma HDL-cholesterol and apo-A were decreased but not significantly. No side effects occurred with either drug. These data suggest that in hemodialysis patients both simvastatin and probucol profoundly affect the lipid profile, as well as the triglyceride levels. Although patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), the roles of lipid-modifying therapies in decreasing CVD risk are unclear. Our aim is to compare the effects of statin and fibrate therapy on arterial function as a risk marker of CVD.
                Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.
                Ambulatory patients with stages 3 to 5 CKD.
                6 weeks of atorvastatin, 40 mg/d, or gemfibrozil, 600 mg twice daily, with placebo.
                Primary outcome was arterial function assessed by means of endothelial-dependent flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) and small-artery compliance (C2). Secondary outcomes included endothelial-independent glyceryl trinitrate-mediated dilatation (GTNMD), large-artery compliance (C1), and levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and oxidized low-density lipoprotein, as well as markers of insulin resistance and inflammation.
                Compared with placebo, atorvastatin significantly decreased low-density lipoprotein (-52%), triglyceride (-30%), and oxidized low-density lipoprotein levels (-41%; P < 0.0001). Gemfibrozil significantly decreased triglyceride levels (-40%) and increased high-density lipoprotein levels (+20%; P < 0.0001). Neither atorvastatin nor gemfibrozil had a significant effect on markers of insulin resistance or inflammation. There was no significant change in FMD, GTNMD, or C1 with either atorvastatin or gemfibrozil. There was improvement in C2 with atorvastatin (+1.1 mL/mm Hg x 100) compared with placebo (P = 0.024), but not with gemfibrozil compared with placebo.
                Small sample size leading to inadequate power, short duration of therapy, and use of a heterogeneous group of patients with CKD and dialysis patients.
                In patients with advanced CKD, atorvastatin is associated with improvement in dyslipidemia and small-artery stiffness, but not endothelial function. Gemfibrozil improves dyslipidemia, but has no effect on arterial function. A 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor is recommended in hemodialysis (HD) patients with hypercholesterolemia to improve their lipid profiles. We evaluated effects of simvastatin on markers for inflammation, oxidative stress, and coagulation in HD patients. Sixty-two maintenance HD patients with serum cholesterol levels of 200 mg/dL or greater were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31; 8 men, 23 women; age, 63 +/- 11 years) and administered simvastatin, 20 mg/d, for 8 weeks or to the control group (n = 31; 10 men, 21 women; age, 60 +/- 12 years). We measured cholesterol, albumin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), malondialdehyde (MDA; an index of lipid peroxidation), and D-dimer (a marker of intravascular coagulation) in blood at baseline and again at 8 weeks. Fifty-eight of 62 patients completed the study. In the control group, total cholesterol, serum albumin, hs-CRP, MDA, and D-dimer levels did not change. In the treatment group, simvastatin administration for 8 weeks significantly reduced total cholesterol levels from 232 +/- 25 to 165 +/- 39 mg/dL (P < 0.001) and hs-CRP levels from a median of 0.23 mg/dL (range, 0.05 to 1.63 mg/dL) to 0.12 mg/dL (range, <0.006 to 1.45 mg/dL; P < 0.01), whereas it increased serum albumin levels from 3.4 +/- 0.3 to 3.6 +/- 0.4 g/dL (P < 0.001). Administration of simvastatin did not affect MDA and D-dimer levels. These results suggest that in addition to the lipid-lowering effect, simvastatin had an antiinflammatory effect in HD patients. Considering that atherosclerosis is inflammation of the vascular wall, simvastatin may have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease, in part because it alleviates inflammation.
                Copyright 2002 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Statins reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events in persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the benefit of statins in such patients receiving hemodialysis, who are at high risk for cardiovascular disease and death, has not been examined.
                We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, prospective study of 1255 subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving maintenance hemodialysis who were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg of atorvastatin per day or matching placebo. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiac causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke. Secondary end points included death from all causes and all cardiac and cerebrovascular events combined.
                After four weeks of treatment, the median level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was reduced by 42 percent among patients receiving atorvastatin, and among those receiving placebo it was reduced by 1.3 percent. During a median follow-up period of four years, 469 patients (37 percent) reached the primary end point, of whom 226 were assigned to atorvastatin and 243 to placebo (relative risk, 0.92; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.77 to 1.10; P=0.37). Atorvastatin had no significant effect on the individual components of the primary end point, except that the relative risk of fatal stroke among those receiving the drug was 2.03 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.05 to 3.93; P=0.04). Atorvastatin reduced the rate of all cardiac events combined (relative risk, 0.82; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.68 to 0.99; P=0.03, nominally significant) but not all cerebrovascular events combined (relative risk, 1.12; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.55; P=0.49) or total mortality (relative risk, 0.93; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.08; P=0.33).
                Atorvastatin had no statistically significant effect on the composite primary end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke in patients with diabetes receiving hemodialysis. Dialysis patients have many underlying traditional and nontraditional risk factors that may predispose them to a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The effects of statins (eg, atorvastatin) on altering nontraditional lipoprotein measures in dialysis patients have not been extensively investigated.
                To evaluate the efficacy of atorvastatin compared with a control group in inducing changes in lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], apolipoprotein (Apo) A-1, Apo-B, and fibrinogen levels, as well as the conventional lipoprotein profile, in hemodialysis patients over 36 weeks; secondary objectives were to assess changes in C-reactive protein, albumin, and safety measures.
                Forty-five hemodialysis patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels greater than 100 mg/dL were randomized to parallel groups: atorvastatin (n = 19) or no treatment (n = 26). The atorvastatin dose was titrated from 10 mg to achieve an LDL-C goal of 100 mg/dL or less and therapy was continued for 36 weeks. Biochemical and lipoprotein laboratory tests for efficacy outcomes were obtained at baseline, 12 weeks, and 36 weeks.
                The atorvastatin group exhibited clinically significant reductions (mean +/- SD) compared with controls in total cholesterol (-21.7 +/- 41.7 vs -3.2 +/- 40.0 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.017) and LDL-C (-13.1 +/- 32.0 vs -1.1 +/- 38.4 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.058) levels, as well as Lp(a) (-10.6 +/- 27 vs 3.5 +/- 17.8 mg/dL, respectively; p = 0.046). Statistical analyses included analysis of variance on ranked measures for multivariable modeling and paired t-test to determine changes in efficacy measures between baseline and 36 weeks within groups.
                Atorvastatin was safe and effective in reducing Lp(a), total cholesterol, and LDL-C levels. Given the prevalence of atherosclerosis in hemodialysis patients, therapy aimed at reducing traditional and nontraditional risk factors may be beneficial. There have been no endpoint studies with statins for patients with severe renal failure. The purpose of this prospective, open, randomized, controlled study was to investigate whether atorvastatin (10 mg/day) would alter cardiovascular endpoints and the overall mortality rate of patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5 (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min).
                The study subjects comprised 143 patients who were randomized either to placebo (controls; n=73; mean age 69.5 years) or to treatment with atorvastatin (n=70; mean age 67.9 years). The patients included were either non-dialysis (n=33), haemodialysis (n=97) or peritoneal dialysis (n=13) patients. Analysis focused on the primary endpoints of all-cause mortality, non-lethal acute myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Statistical analysis for endpoint data was mainly by intention-to-treat.
                Primary endpoints occurred in 74% of the subjects. There was no difference in outcome between the control and atorvastatin groups. The 5-year endpoint-free survival rate from study entry was 20%. Atorvastatin was withdrawn in 20% of patients due to unacceptable side-effects. In the atorvastatin group, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol was reduced by 35% at 1 month and then sustained. The controls showed a progressive reduction in LDL cholesterol until 36 months.
                Although atorvastatin reduced total and LDL cholesterol effectively it was not beneficial regarding the long-term outcomes of cardiovascular endpoints or survival. In contrast to other patient groups, patients with severe chronic kidney disease, especially those on dialysis, seem to derive limited benefit from this lower dose of atorvastatin. Individuals with chronic renal disease are at high risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and therefore the management of dyslipidemia is particularly important in this patient population. This double-blind randomized study investigated the efficacy and safety of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients with dyslipidemia.
                Following a two- to four-week baseline period, patients with low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol > or =3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL) were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg (N = 82) or placebo (N = 95) for 16 weeks. If LDL-cholesterol remained > or =3.5 mmol/L, the dose of atorvastatin was titrated to 20 mg and 40 mg after four and eight weeks, respectively.
                After four weeks a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving atorvastatin 10 mg had achieved the LDL-cholesterol goal < or =3.5 mmol/L compared with patients receiving placebo (85.4% vs. 16.0%; P < or = 0.001). The statistically significant difference between the two groups was maintained at week 8 and week 16 (P < or = 0.001 at both time points). At week 16, patients receiving atorvastatin had significantly greater reductions from baseline in LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglycerides and total cholesterol:HDL-cholesterol ratio (all P = 0.0001), and a significantly greater increase from baseline in HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.001) than patients receiving placebo. The overall adverse event profile for atorvastatin was similar to that observed with placebo.
                Atorvastatin was effective in achieving target LDL-cholesterol levels in a high proportion of the dyslipidemic CAPD patients studied at doses that are well tolerated.
Statins decreased cholesterol levels in dialysis patients similar to that of the general population. With the exception of one study, studies were of short duration and therefore the efficacy of statins in decreasing the mortality rate is still unclear. Statins appear to be safe in this high-risk population. Ongoing studies should provide more insight about the efficacy of statins in reducing mortality rates in dialysis patients.