Adverse reactions and antibody response to four doses of acellular or whole cell pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in the first 19 months of life. Acellular pertussis vaccine as a booster dose for seventeen- to nineteen-month-old children immunized with either whole cell or acellular pertussis vaccine at two, four and six months of age. Differences in reactogenicity and antigenicity of acellular and standard pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus in infants. Safety and immunogenicity of a five-component acellular pertussis vaccine with varying antigen quantities. Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis vaccine. A comparison of the immune response and adverse reactions to conventional and acellular pertussis components. Comparison of the safety and immunogenicity of acellular (BIKEN) and whole-cell pertussis vaccines in 15- to 20-month-old children. Hypotonic hyporesponsive episodes in eight pertussis vaccine studies. A double-blind study comparing an acellular pertussis-component DTP vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccine in 18-month-old children. Randomized controlled trial of acellular diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus vaccines in southern Ghana. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (dTpa) administered as a booster to 4-6 year-old children primed with four doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine. [An observation on immunization reaction and serological effect of adsorbed purified pertussis vaccine]. Controlled study of a new five-component acellular pertussis vaccine in adults and young children. Acellular and whole-cell pertussis vaccines as booster doses: a multicenter study. Comparative study of a whole-cell pertussis vaccine and a recombinant acellular pertussis vaccine. The Italian Multicenter Group for the Study of Recombinant Acellular Pertussis Vaccine. Study of pertussis vaccines in infants: comparison of response to acellular pertussis DTP vaccines containing 25 micrograms of FHA and either 25 or 8 micrograms of PT with response to whole-cell pertussis DTP vaccine. Comparative study of Lederle/Takeda acellular and Lederle whole-cell pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines in infants in Germany. Evaluation of a new highly purified pertussis vaccine in infants and children. Clinical trials in the United States and Japan with the Lederle-Takeda and Takeda acellular pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus (APDT) vaccines. The Multicenter APDT Vaccine Study Groups. Comparison of 13 acellular pertussis vaccines: adverse reactions. Safety and immunogenicity of six acellular pertussis vaccines and one whole-cell pertussis vaccine given as a fifth dose in four- to six-year-old children. Comparison of acellular and whole-cell pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines in infants. The APDT Vaccine Study Group. Comparison of an acellular pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccine in 17- to 24-month-old children, with measurement of 69-kilodalton outer membrane protein antibody. Phase II trial of whole-cell pertussis vaccine vs an acellular vaccine containing agglutinogens. Primary immunization of infants with an acellular pertussis vaccine in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Acellular pertussis diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine containing separately purified pertussis toxoid, filamentous haemagglutinin and 69 kDa outer membrane protein as a booster in children. Comparison of a fifth dose of a five-component acellular or a whole cell pertussis vaccine in children four to six years of age. Safety and immunogenicity of acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in 17- to 24-month-old children. Nature, evolution, and appraisal of adverse events and antibody response associated with the fifth consecutive dose of a five-component acellular pertussis-based combination vaccine. A safety and immunogenicity comparison of 12 acellular pertussis vaccines and one whole-cell pertussis vaccine given as a fourth dose in 15- to 20-month-old children. Antibody response and reactions to completion of a four-dose series with a two- or three-component acellular pertussis vaccine compared to whole cell pertussis vaccine. Comparison of a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine with whole cell pertussis vaccine in two-month-old children. Comparison of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and bicomponent acellular pertussis vaccine with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis vaccine in infants. Acellular pertussis vaccination of 2-month-old infants in the United States. Simultaneous administration of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine with measles-mumps-rubella and oral poliovirus vaccines. Clinical reactions and immunogenicity of the BIKEN acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine in 4- through 6-year-old US children. Comparison of a three-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell pertussis vaccine in 15- through 20-month-old infants. A controlled trial of a two-component acellular, a five-component acellular, and a whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Safety and immunogenicity of Chiron/Biocine recombinant acellular pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus vaccine in infants and toddlers. A controlled trial of two acellular vaccines and one whole-cell vaccine against pertussis. Progetto Pertosse Working Group. Comparative safety and immunogenicity of an acellular versus whole-cell pertussis component of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines in Senegalese infants. Primary immunization series for infants: comparison of two-component acellular and standard whole-cell pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids. Comparison of acellular (B type) and whole-cell pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines as the first booster immunization in 15- to 24-month-old children.
To assess the safety, immunogenicity, and lot consistency of a five-component acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid (Connaught Laboratories Limited), we randomly allocated 432 infants to receive one of three lots of an acellular pertussis vaccine or a single lot of whole cell pertussis vaccine. Infants were immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age and between 17 and 19 months of age. Local and systemic adverse reactions were reported significantly more frequently by recipients of the whole cell than acellular vaccine after each dose. The antibody response against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, and 69 kDa protein was of greater magnitude in acellular pertussis vaccine recipients than whole cell pertussis vaccine recipients. Small differences were detected amongst the vaccine lots tested. We conclude that the acellular pertussis vaccine is safe and immunogenic for the first four doses in children under 2 years of age. The safety and immunogenicity of two formulations of an acellular pertussis vaccine as a booster at 17 to 19 months of age were assessed in children immunized at 2, 4 and 6 months of age with acellular or whole cell pertussis vaccine. In Study I 86 children primed with a five-component acellular vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids or with a whole cell pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus vaccine were boosted with the same vaccine. Local reactions (64% vs. 93%; relative risk, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.9) and systemic reactions (68% vs. 97%; relative risk, 0.7; 95% confidence interval, 0.5 to 0.9) were less common after the fourth dose of acellular vaccine than after the fourth dose of whole cell vaccine. In Study II 96 children primed with either an acellular or whole cell pertussis vaccine were boosted with an acellular vaccine. Local adverse reactions after booster immunization with acellular vaccine were more common in children primed with acellular vaccine than those primed with whole cell vaccine (68% vs. 33%; relative risk, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.3 to 3.3). Antibody response to pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin and fimbriae were higher before and 1 month after the booster dose in children primed with the acellular vaccine. We conclude that the acellular pertussis vaccine is safe and immunogenic when used for the booster dose in children primed with either whole cell or acellular vaccine but is associated with local reactions. Clinical and serological responses of infants to primary immunization with diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine containing components of acellular pertussis vaccine (DTP-AC) were compared in a double-blind study with responses of infants receiving whole-cell DTP vaccine (DTP-WC). Three doses of either DTP-AC containing lymphocytosis-promoting factor (LPF) and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) or DTP-WC vaccine were given to infants at two, four, and six months of age. Nineteen infants received DTP-AC vaccine, and 20 infants received DTP-WC vaccine. Significantly more infants who received DTP-WC vaccine manifested fever, swelling, and/or total reactions than did infants who received DTP-AC vaccine. Infants who received DTP-AC vaccine had comparable antibody titers to LPF and significantly higher titers to FHA after three immunizations, as compared with the infants who received DTP-WC vaccine (P less than or equal to .001). The DTP-WC vaccine stimulated higher pertussis agglutination titers (P = .04) than did DTP-AC. The DTP-AC vaccine was immunogenic and significantly less reactogenic in infants than was the currently used DTP-WC vaccine. nan Although the conventional Bordetella pertussis vaccine, which consists of killed whole organisms, has been shown to be effective in preventing disease, it has been associated with transient local and systemic reactions and may produce encephalopathy, though rarely. A new acellular pertussis vaccine containing partially purified protein antigens, filamentous hemagglutinin, and lymphocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin has been developed for use in Japan. We compared the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of conventional and acellular pertussis vaccine. Forty children aged 4 to 6 years and 40 children aged 18 to 24 months, all previously immunized at appropriate times with conventional diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine, were enrolled. We randomly assigned children to receive either conventional pertussis vaccine or acellular pertussis vaccine in a double-blind fashion. The diphtheria and tetanus components in both preparations were identical. Equivalent rises in pertussis agglutinin titers and antibodies to filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor hemagglutinin were measured in both vaccine groups at both ages that we studied. However, reaction rates to the two vaccines in both age groups were strikingly different. Acellular pertussis vaccine was significantly less reactogenic for fever, pain, fretfulness, abnormal gait, and local reactions at the vaccine administration site. If studies in progressively younger children confirm its reduced reactogenicity and equal immunogenicity, and if large-scale trials indicate its efficacy, the acellular pertussis vaccine may be a more appropriate candidate than the current vaccine. To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine (BIKEN) with whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (WC-DTP) when administered to children aged 15 to 20 months.
                A randomized, double-blind study.
                Children in this study were from 12 general pediatric practices (11 were private and one was university-affiliated) and one inner-city university pediatric clinic.
                Two hundred forty-six children aged 15 to 20 months who had received a three-dose primary series of standard WC-DTP vaccine during infancy.
                Children were randomly assigned to receive either WC-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (DT-aP) in a 1:3 ratio at the 11 private practices and in a 1:1 ratio at the university-affiliated practice and inner-city university pediatric clinic.
                The DT-aP vaccines contained 23.4 micrograms each of pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as WC-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours were recorded by parents who were contacted by telephone at 24 and 72 hours and 14 days after immunization.
                An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method was used to determine IgG antibody response to pertussis toxin and filamentous hemagglutinin and IgG, IgA, and IgM to tetanus toxoids; a Chinese hamster ovary cell assay was used to measure functional antibodies to pertussis toxin; serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria anti-toxin. Recipients of the DT-aP vaccine had fewer local reactions in the first 6 to 48 hours and fewer systemic reactions at 24 hours than did recipients of the WC-DTP vaccine. Acetaminophen was administered to 31% of DT-aP recipients compared with 63% of WC-DTP recipients. Infants given DT-aP had higher geometric mean antibody titer levels against pertussis antigens after vaccination.
                The BIKEN DT-aP vaccine used in this study is less reactogenic and more immunogenic for selected pertussis antigens than the WC-DTP vaccine in children aged 15 to 20 months. nan An acellular pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (AC-DTP) vaccine was compared with a currently licensed, whole-cell pertussis-component DTP (WC-DTP) vaccine for reactogenicity and immunogenicity when given as the fourth DTP immunization in sixty 18- to 24-month-old children. Reactions over the first 48 hours were significantly less common in the AC-DTP vaccine recipients, as follows (WC-DTP/AC-DTP): fever, 85%/5%; redness, 70%/12.5%; tenderness, 100%/22.5%; swelling, 35%/10%; fretfulness, 70%/12.5%; anorexia, 35%/2.5%; and vomiting, 10%/0%. Antibody responses to pertussis antigens (agglutinogens, lymphocytosis-promoting factor, and filamentous hemagglutinin), diphtheria toxoid, and tetanus toxoid in AC-DTP vaccine recipients were comparable with those in WC-DTP vaccine recipients. The AC-DTP vaccine evaluated in this trial seems to be as immunogenic as WC-DTP vaccine while being markedly less reactogenic. A randomized controlled trial of acellular diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus (ADPT) freeze-dried and liquid vaccines in infants was conducted in a peri-urban community (Ashaiman) in southern Ghana. Immunogenicity of the acellular vaccines, persistence of antibodies and adverse reactions were compared with those achieved with a whole-cell diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) vaccine. The incidence of pertussis in the vaccine groups and prevalence of pertussis in children under 5 years of age in the study area were also determined. The acellular vaccines produced significantly fewer local and systemic reactions. Local reactions such as swelling and redness were observed in 2% (8/399) to 2.3% (9/385) of the acellular vaccine recipients as against 31% (122/394) in the whole-cell vaccine group. Fever ( > or = 37.5 degrees C) occurred in 7.27% (29/399) to 9.8% (38/385) in the acellular vaccine groups compared with 36.6% (145/394) in the whole-cell vaccine group. Geometric mean titres (GMTs), measured by ELISA, to pertussis toxin (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) were significantly higher in the acellular vaccine groups than in the whole-cell DPT (WCDPT) group. There were no significant differences in the GMTs of tetanus and diphtheria antitoxins between the two groups after each vaccination. Twelve months after primary vaccination, GMTs to PT in the freeze-dried, liquid ADPT groups and the WCDPT group have fallen from 56.23, 62.63 and 44.97 ELISA U/ml to 6.08, 6.18 and 11.30 ELISA U/ml, respectively. GMTs to FHA in all the vaccine groups also dropped during the same period from 49.94, 41.73 and 20.74 ELISA U/ml to 7.26, 7.72 and 5.91 ELISA U/ml, respectively. In this comparative controlled trial, the ADPT vaccines were more immunogenic, with less local and systemic reactions, than the WCDPT vaccine but there was a considerable drop in antibody titres in all the vaccine groups 12 months after primary vaccination. However, the levels of titres of anti-PT and anti-FHA antibodies in all the three vaccines that confer protection are not known. Further studies are necessary to provide this information in order to assess the need for subsequent booster doses after primary immunization with both ADPT and WCDPT vaccines. A trial to compare the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (dTpa) vaccine with diphtheria-tetanus-whole-cell pertussis (DTPw) vaccine was conducted in Thailand. Three hundred and thirty children aged 4-6 years, primed with four doses of DTPw, received a single injection of either dTpa or DTPw. There was a significantly lower incidence of local and general reactions following dTpa than DTPw (P<0.001). One month after vaccination, 99.4 and 100% of all subjects had protective anti-diphtheria and -tetanus titers, respectively. The vaccine response rate to pertussis antigens was similar in both groups, with 96.9% versus 92.5% for anti-pertussis toxin (PT), 96.9% versus 97.5% for anti-filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA) and 95.1% versus 90.8% for anti-pertactin (PRN) in the dTpa and DTPw groups, respectively. For anti-BPT, the vaccine response in the dTpa group was 29.6% versus 94.4% for DTPw. In conclusion, the dTpa vaccine was as immunogenic and significantly better tolerated than DTPw. The new dTpa vaccine could improve coverage for routine booster vaccination in children and provide a good replacement for DTP vaccines at 4-6 years of age. An observation on immunization reaction and serological effect of adsorbed purified pertussis vaccine for the first time in China had been carried out in Zhengzhou. Phase I field trial had been conducted in 8 adults and 20 children in whom there was no local reaction and temperature reaction in adults and only mild temperature reaction (37.6 degrees C-38 degrees C) in 4 children. Phase II field trial showed that the adsorbed purified pertussis vaccine manifested trivial reaction, none developed severe temperature reaction (39.1 degrees C), and 8 person-times of moderate temperature reaction (38.1 degrees C-39.1 degrees C) occurred in 100 children after 3 doses. Whereas 2 person-times of severe reaction and 39 person-times of mild reaction occurred in 101 children after receiving the whole cell pertussis vaccine. None showed local severe reaction (5.1 cm) and 1 person-time of mild local reaction appeared at 48 hours after each of 3 doses of adsorbed purified pertussis vaccine (102, 102, 98 children, respectively); Whereas, 3 person-times of severe local reaction and 17 person-times of mild local reaction occurred after each of 3 doses of whole cell pertussis vaccine (97, 100, 97 children, respectively). Satisfactory immunogenicity of the adsorbed purified pertussis vaccine was confirmed. The high serum hemagglutinin titer was achieved in 90 children, the GMT reached 817 (9.16 for preimmunization), and titers reaching 1:320 and over (a level protecting human from being infected) accounted for 84.4 percent. The average levels of anti-LPF and anti-FHA antibodies in 60 and 53 persons attained to 24.17 +/- 3.9421 EU/ml and 38.85 +/- 7.2466 EU/ml, respectively. A new five-component acellular pertussis (AP) vaccine containing 10 micrograms of pertussis toxoid, 5 micrograms of filamentous hemagglutinin, 5 micrograms of combined agglutinogens 2 and 3, and 3 micrograms of pertactin was evaluated in adults and young children. AP vaccine was compared with saline placebo in 31 adults, and AP vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (ADTP) was compared with whole cell DTP in 41 children, ages 16-20 months, who had received whole cell DTP during infancy. AP was mildly to moderately reactogenic in adults, with pain noted within 72 h and 5-8 days after immunization. ADTP was less reactogenic than DTP in children, with significantly decreased pain, redness, irritability, and fever and less use of acetaminophen reported. No late reactions were observed in any child. The multicomponent ADTP was immunogenic, with four-fold or greater antibody rises to at least four pertussis antibody assays in all 15 immunized adults. Pertussis-specific antibody responses in children who received ADTP and DTP were similar. The multicomponent ADTP vaccine is currently being studied in a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-sponsored efficacy study in Sweden. To compare the safety and immunogenicity of a variety of acellular (AC) and whole-cell (WC) pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.
                Standard enrollment and reaction forms were used at five sites, and serologic evaluation was performed at a single site. Nine AC (Massachusetts Public Health Laboratories, Biocine Sclavo recombinant pertussis toxoid [PT], Connaught/BIKEN, Lederle three-component, Biocine Sclavo recombinant three-component, SmithKline Beecham three-component, Porton three-component, Takeda-Wyeth, and Connaught multicomponent), and three WC (Connaught Laboratories, Lederle Laboratories, and Massachusetts Public Health Laboratories) were studied. All AC contained varying concentrations of PT; some vaccines also contained filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertactin, and/or agglutinogens.
                Two hundred forty children, aged 16 to 21 months and 4 to 6 years, were enrolled at five sites. Significantly less fever, redness, swelling, pain, limp, and use of pain medication were noted following AC compared with WC. Significant increases in antibody to PT were seen following all vaccines. Significant rises in FHA antibody were seen following all WC and the seven AC that contained FHA. Postbooster PT antibody levels were similar among the AC groups, regardless of the amount of PT administered (between 3.5 and 25 micrograms per dose). The dose of FHA did not affect PT antibody response. Infants primed with WC who were boosted with a monocomponent PT vaccine did not manifest a significant antibody response to FHA.
                The rate of adverse reactions was not a function of the number of antigens or the antigen quantity in the acellular vaccines, and antibody responses following AC were similar or better than antibody responses following WC. These results support the further evaluation of these vaccines in a larger National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-sponsored study in infants. The safety and immunogenicity of an acellular pertussis vaccine containing the genetically detoxified pertussis toxin PT-9K/129G, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin, together with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, were compared with those of a whole-cell pertussis component-diphtheria-tetanus vaccine. Four hundred eighty infants were enrolled into this prospective, multicenter, double-blind study. Each infant was randomly given three doses of one of the two vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Both local and systemic adverse reactions, reported within 48 hours and 7 days of each injection, were less frequent after the acellular vaccine than after the whole-cell vaccine. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers to pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin, as well as the pertussis toxin-neutralizing titer measured by the Chinese hamster ovary cell assay, were significantly higher after the acellular vaccine was given. Both vaccines induced adequate levels of anti-diphtheria and anti-tetanus antibodies. We conclude that the recombinant acellular pertussis vaccine produces fewer reactions than the whole-cell vaccine and provides a high antibody response against the antigens of Bordetella pertussis involved in bacterial adhesion and systemic toxic effects. Clinical and serological responses of infants to primary vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTPa) vaccines containing 25 micrograms of filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) and either 25 or 8 micrograms of pertussis toxoid (PT) were compared in a double-blind randomized study with responses of infants receiving whole-cell pertussis DTP vaccine (DTPw). In total, 308 healthy infants were enrolled to receive three vaccine doses at 3, 4 and 5 months of age. DTPa recipients had significantly lower incidences of local reactions and fever than the DTPw recipients. No differences in reactogenicity were observed between DTPa groups receiving 8 and 25 micrograms doses of PT. After vaccination, an immune response to PT was seen in 96% of 25 micrograms PT DTPa recipients, 94% of DTPw recipients and 86% of 8 micrograms PT DTPa recipients. The geometric mean anti-PT neutralizing antibody titre was significantly higher for 25 micrograms PT dose recipients (34.9 Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)) as compared with 8 micrograms PT dose recipients (21.0 CHO). The results support the use of the higher dose of PT in acellular pertussis vaccine preparations. In preparation for a large efficacy trial in Germany, a pilot study was initiated in December 1990. In this study 149 infants were enrolled; with double-blind randomization 75 received Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (APDT) and 74 received Lederle whole-cell pertussis component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine (DTP). The mean age at first dose was 3.5 months, and the second and third doses followed at 6-week intervals. Reactions were relatively mild with both vaccines; in general they were less frequent following APDT. The IgG antibody responses to lymphocytosis promoting factor (LPF) and fimbriae-2 were similar in both groups whereas the responses to pertactin and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) were greater in APDT recipients. DTP recipients had greater responses to tetanus and diphtheria toxoids. When age of first dose was examined (8-12 weeks versus 16-20 weeks), it was found that young age had a suppressive effect on antibody responses in DTP but not APDT recipients to LPF toxoid, pertactin, fimbriae-2, and tetanus and diphtheria toxoids. High values of transplacentally acquired antibody lessened the response to LPF toxoid and tetanus toxoid in DTP recipients and to tetanus toxoid in APDT vaccinees. The IgG immune response to LPF toxoid, FHA and fimbriae-2 was found to be more uniform in APDT recipients than in DTP vaccinees. An IgA antibody response to fimbriae-2 was noted in 13% of DTP recipients but in no APDT vaccinees. The broad immunogenicity and mild reactogenicity of this APDT vaccine justifies its use in the German efficacy trial. Purified acellular pertussis vaccine (12.5 micrograms of lymphocytosis promoting factor [LPF] and 12.5 micrograms of filamentous hemagglutinin [FHA]) was compared with conventional pertussis vaccine in a randomized double-blind study involving 40 children aged 4-6 y, 40 children aged 18-24 mo, and 50 infants. Increases in antibody were significantly greater among recipients of acellular vaccine than among recipients of conventional vaccine for antibodies to LPF in all age groups and for antibodies to FHA in infants and children aged 4-6 y; the increase in FHA antibody was also greater with acellular vaccine among children aged 18-24 mo but not significantly so. Compared with conventional vaccine, acellular vaccine was significantly associated with reduced frequency of leg pain and fretfulness at all ages and less frequent fever and anorexia at some ages. The reduced reaction rates and comparable or enhanced immunogenicity of the acellular vaccine make it an attractive candidate for larger field trials, particularly among infants. The results of the following studies are reported: a longitudinal double blind trial comparing Lederle-Takeda APDT vaccine with Lederle DTP vaccine in two, four and six month old infants; two double blind similar APDT vs DTP trials in 18 month old and four to six year old children; a large longitudinal open trial with APDT in two, four and six month old infants and a household contact efficacy trial with Takeda APDT in Japan. APDT vaccine recipients had a lesser frequency and less severe reactions than whole cell vaccine recipients. Antibody responses to lymphocytosis-promoting factor and agglutinogens were higher in DTP recipients; APDT recipients had a better serologic response to filamentous hemagglutinin. Equivalent 69K protein antibody responses were seen. Vaccine efficacy in the household contact study was 98% (95% CI = 84% to 99%) against classical pertussis and 81% (95 CI = 64% to 90%) if all respiratory illnesses are considered. To compare the reactogenicity of a licensed conventional whole-cell (WCL) and 13 acellular pertussis vaccines that differed in the source, manufacture, and quantity of included antigens; all vaccines included diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.
                Healthy infants were enrolled through six university-based vaccine and treatment evaluation units and were randomized to receive one of the study vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Parents recorded the occurrence of fever, redness, swelling, pain, fussiness, drowsiness, anorexia, and use of antipyretics for 2 weeks after each inoculation; nurses interviewed parents on the third day and at each succeeding visit; long-term follow-up information was collected from parents and medical records 1 year after the third immunization.
                Of 2200 vaccinated infants, 2189 contributed reaction data after 6375 vaccinations. For every acellular vaccine, every monitored reaction except vomiting occurred at a significantly lower frequency and severity than was seen with WCL. The groups receiving acellular pertussis vaccines differed significantly with respect to redness, swelling, pain, and vomiting, but not with respect to fussiness, antipyretic use, drowsiness, or anorexia.
                Although there were differences among the acellular vaccines, none was consistently the most or least reactogenic; all were associated with substantially fewer and less severe adverse reactions than a standard commercial whole-cell vaccine. Selection of acellular vaccines for further development and for introduction into efficacy trials can give priority to assessments of immunogenicity and purity, with comparative reactogenicity a secondary consideration. To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of 6 different acellular pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTaP) and with 1 licensed whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) as a fifth dose in children who had previously received the same DTaP, a different DTaP, or DTwP as primary and fourth-dose vaccinations.
                Healthy 4- to 6-year-old children were enrolled at 5 National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units to receive a fifth dose of a DTaP or DTwP vaccine. All had been randomly assigned to receive 3 primary doses of DTaP or DTwP at 2, 4, and 6 months and a fourth-dose booster at 15 to 20 months of age as part of earlier National Institutes of Health multicenter acellular pertussis vaccine trials. Parents recorded the occurrence and magnitude of fever, irritability, and injection site redness, swelling, and pain for 3 days after vaccination. Sera obtained before and 1 month after the booster vaccination were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for antibody to pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, fimbriae, pertactin, and diphtheria and tetanus toxoid. Safety and/or immunogenicity data are reported for 317 children who received DTaP and 10 children who received DTwP.
                Fever and moderate or severe irritability were uncommon following the fifth dose of DTaP vaccine and were generally less frequent than following the fourth dose. However, for the DTaP vaccine groups, redness, swelling, and pain increased in prevalence compared with the fourth dose. The time course and frequency of reactions following DTaP vaccination were generally similar in children who received the same DTaP, a different DTaP, or DTwP for previous doses in the 5- dose series. No significant differences among the DTaP vaccines were detected in the occurrence of reactions, but the statistical power to detect differences was limited by sample size. Significant increases in antibodies directed against the included antigens were observed for all DTaP vaccines in paired pre- and post-fifth dose sera. Post-fifth dose antibody concentrations differed significantly among the DTaP vaccines. Some children in the study showed an antibody response to an antigen not reported to be in the DTaP vaccine.
                All the studied DTaP vaccines performed similarly with regard to reactions, whether given as a fifth sequential dose of the same vaccine, a mix of different DTaP vaccines in the 5-dose sequence, or after 3 DTwP and 1 DTaP vaccinations. Large injection site reactions occurred more frequently after the fifth dose of DTaP than after the previous 4 doses. A fifth dose of all DTaP vaccines induced an antibody response to those antigens contained in the vaccine. No DTaP was consistently most or least reactogenic or immunogenic. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, longitudinal study, 252 children received licensed Lederle diphtheria-tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine adsorbed (DTP) at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and 245 children received a DTP vaccine with the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component (APDT) at the same ages. Both groups of children received APDT vaccine at 18 months of age. After each of the first three immunizations, APDT vaccine recipients had fewer local and systemic reactions than did DTP vaccinees. Reactions after the 18-month APDT vaccination were minimal in severity regardless of the vaccine previously received. Antibody responses to lymphocytosis-promoting factor and agglutinogens were more pronounced in DTP recipients; however, APDT recipients had a better serologic response to filamentous hemagglutinin, and responses to the 69K protein were equivalent. This APDT vaccine produces fewer reactions than the standard whole-cell DTP vaccine. The protective significance of the serologic responses to the APDT vaccine is unknown, but the greater response to filamentous hemagglutinin and equivalent response to the 69K protein compared with those to DTP vaccine seem promising. Healthy 17- to 24-month-old children, previously immunized with three doses of whole-cell diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine, were enrolled in a multi-center double-blind, randomized study comparing a DTP vaccine with an acellular pertussis-component (APDT) and a conventional whole-cell pertussis-component DTP vaccine. Thirty-eight children received APDT vaccine, and 37 children received DTP vaccine. APDT vaccine recipients had significantly less local pain and warmth than DTP vaccine recipients. Antibody responses to lymphocytosis-promoting factor were similar in the two groups. The APDT vaccine recipients had a higher IgG antibody response to filamentous hemagglutinin than the DTP vaccinees had. Equivalent agglutinin responses were seen in the two groups. The APDT vaccine recipients had a significantly better antibody re-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, than DTP vaccinees had 1 month and 1 year after immunization. This APDT vaccine was immunogenic and caused fewer local reactions than conventional DTP vaccine when administered as a fourth dose to 17- to 24-month-old children. An acellular pertussis vaccine containing agglutinogens 2 and 3, pertussis toxin, and filamentous haemagglutinin was developed by the Centre for Applied Microbiology and Research in the UK. 188 infants were entered into a randomised blind trial and received either the acellular or a whole-cell vaccine, combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, in a 3, 5, and 8-10 month schedule. Local reactions were similar in the two groups but significantly fewer infants had systemic symptoms after the acellular vaccine. Mean log-antibody titres to the agglutinogen and toxin components were higher with the acellular than with the whole-cell vaccine. Persistence of antibodies one year after the third dose was also better in the acellular group. The rate of adverse reactions and the immunogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine as compared with a plain whole-cell vaccine and a placebo were evaluated for primary immunization in 319 6-month-old infants in a double-blind randomized clinical trial. The acellular vaccine produced few and mild systemic and local reactions. Fever (greater than or equal to 38 degrees C) occurred in 6% to 8% of acellular vaccinees as opposed to 25% to 37% of whole-cell vaccinees. Redness (greater than or equal to 1 cm) appeared in 2% to 13% of the acellular vaccine and 24% to 32% of the whole-cell vaccine recipients. Antibody response to pertussis toxin measured in a neutralization test was obtained in 97% to 100% of the infants receiving either two or three doses of the acellular vaccine as compared to 59% after three doses of whole-cell vaccine. In two double-blind, randomized, comparative studies involving a total of 218 children, an acellular pertussis (DTPa) vaccine containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis components filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA), pertussis toxoid (PT), and 69 kDa outer membrane protein (69 kDa OMP) was administered as a booster to 17-month-old and 5-year-old children with a history of routine whole-cell diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTPw) vaccination. The control groups in these studies received DTPw vaccine. Among 17-month-old toddlers, significantly lower proportions of DTPa vaccine recipients had local pain (7.3%), redness (14.5%) and swelling (9.1%) than DTPw vaccine recipients (23.6%, 30.9% and 23.6%, respectively). A trend toward fewer local reactions was also seen in 5-year-old children vaccinated with DTPa in private practice and public clinics although differences were not statistically significant. Fever (rectal temperature > or = 38 degrees C) was reported more frequently for DTPw vaccine recipients in both age groups. While no differences existed between groups in terms of geometric mean antibody titres (GMTs) prior to booster vaccination, anti-PT antibody GMTs were higher among DTPa vaccine recipients than among DTPw vaccine recipients after booster vaccination. The difference was statistically significant in 5-year-old subjects. Furthermore, significantly higher anti-FHA and anti-69 kDa OMP GMTs were seen in DTPa vaccine recipients in both age groups. In pre-vaccination seropositive subjects and in pre-vaccination seronegative subjects the rate of immune response to pertussis antigens was higher for DTPa than for DTPw vaccine recipients with the exception of the rate of response induced to 69 kDa OMP in 5-year-old children.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Acellular pertussis vaccines are now preferred for all five childhood immunization doses; however, there are few data on the safety and immunogenicity of five consecutive doses. This study compared a fifth dose of an acellular and a whole cell pertussis vaccine in 4- to 6-year-old children previously immunized with four doses of acellular or whole cell pertussis vaccine.
                In a double blind, multicenter study, 366 healthy children were randomly allocated to receive a single injection of a 5-component acellular or a whole cell pertussis vaccine, each combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and inactivated poliovirus vaccine.
                Although injection site redness > or =50 mm and swelling > or =50 mm were common in children who had received five doses of acellular (50% and 48.1%, respectively) or whole cell (66.2% and 59.7%) pertussis vaccine, limb soreness and limitation of motion were less frequently reported after acellular (1.9% and 0%) than after whole cell (49.2% and 36.3%; P < 0.0001) pertussis vaccine. Pre-fifth dose antipertussis antibody titers were higher in children who previously had received four doses of acellular pertussis vaccine. Postimmunization antibody titers against pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin and tetanus toxin were higher in recipients of five doses of acellular pertussis vaccine, whereas antibody titers to diphtheria toxin, pertussis fimbriae and poliovirus serotypes were higher in recipients of five doses of the whole cell pertussis vaccine (P < 0.05 for all comparisons).
                A regimen consisting of five doses of a five-component acellular pertussis combination vaccine is safe and immunogenic in pre-school children. Local adverse reactions are common but are less painful and activity-limiting than a regimen of five doses of a whole cell pertussis vaccine. A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing 4 lots of acellular pertussis-diphtheria tetanus toxoids vaccine (APDT) to whole cell DTP vaccine in 397 children was conducted at 7 clinical centers. Children were immunized at 17 to 24 months of age and sera were obtained pre- and postimmunization. Sera were analyzed for antibody to pertussis antigens (pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, with a molecular weight of 69,000 (69k) outer membrane protein and agglutinogens) and to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Information concerning local reactions and systemic events was collected daily for 10 days postimmunization. The acellular vaccine produced significantly fewer local reactions than whole cell DTP. Parents reported that drowsiness or fretfulness occurred significantly less often in APDT vaccine recipients compared with whole cell DTP recipients. Fever greater than or equal to 38.3 degrees C occurred in 8% of APDT vaccine recipients and in 15% of whole cell DTP vaccine recipients (P = 0.06). The only significant difference in immune response to pertussis antigens between the two vaccines was for filamentous hemagglutinin (P less than 0.01) for which significantly higher antibody concentrations were found in the APDT vaccine group. We conclude that this APDT vaccine is safe and immunogenic when administered as a booster dose to 18-month-old children. We performed a randomized, controlled clinical trial to characterize the evolution of the adverse events associated with the fifth consecutive dose of an acellular pertussis vaccine, and to assess the level of discomfort associated with the injection and the attitude of parents concerning these events. A total of 505 children who had received either four doses of acellular pertussis vaccine or whole-cell pertussis vaccine were given a fifth dose of one of the two vaccines. Adverse events were monitored by parents and collected by telephone or home visit at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h, and 7 and 28 days after immunization. Rates of injection site redness >or=50mm were similar in recipients of five doses of acellular pertussis vaccine (32.8%) or five doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine (43.3%). Injection site swelling, tenderness, and decreased arm movement were all more frequent in children who received five doses of whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Antibody levels before or after immunization did not predict those children who had increased injection site reactions. The children rated the injection site reactions as significantly more severe after five consecutive doses of whole-cell vaccine. Parent satisfaction was higher after the acellular vaccine. We conclude that a fifth consecutive dose of a whole-cell pertussis vaccine is associated with high rates of tender redness and swelling at the injection site, in contrast to a fifth consecutive dose of an acellular pertussis vaccine which is associated with high rates of non-painful redness. However, parents will still need to be aware of the high rates of injection site reactions expected after a fifth dose of acellular pertussis vaccine. To compare the safety and immunogenicity of 12 different acellular pertussis vaccines combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTaP) with one licensed diphtheria, tetanus, and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) as a fourth-dose booster in children who had previously received DTaP or DTwP primary vaccinations.
                Healthy 15- to 20-month-old children were enrolled at six National Institutes of Health Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units. All had been randomly assigned to receive three primary doses of DTaP or DTwP at 2, 4, and 6 months of age as part of an earlier National Institutes of Health multicenter trial of DTaP vaccines in the same Vaccine Treatment and Evaluation Units. Parents recorded the occurrence and magnitude of fever; irritability; and injection site redness, swelling, and pain for 3 days after vaccination. Sera obtained before and 1 month after the booster vaccination were analyzed for antibody to pertussis toxin (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), fimbriae (FIM), and pertactin (PRN). Diphtheria and tetanus toxoid as well as PT neutralizing (Chinese hamster ovary cell) and whole-cell agglutinating antibodies were measured on a subset of sera.
                A total of 1293 children contributed fourth-dose reaction data. Reactions were less frequent after DTaP than after DTwP. For children vaccinated with a fourth dose of DTaP, which was the same DTaP as received in the primary series, fever and injection site redness, swelling, and pain increased in prevalence compared with the third dose in the primary series. For children receiving DTaP as a fourth dose, injection site redness and swelling occurred more frequently in DTaP-primed than in DTwP-primed children. Variation in the occurrence of reactions among DTaP vaccines was observed. A total of 1160 paired pre- and postvaccination sera were available for analysis. Serum antibody concentrations before boosting were lower than those obtained 1 month after the primary immunization. After the fourth dose, significant increases in antibodies directed against the included antigens were observed for all vaccines; postbooster vaccination antibody titers differed significantly among the DTaP vaccines. For children primed and boosted with the same DTaP, antibody levels were not directly related to the quantity of antigen included for PT, FHA, and FIM; for PRN, there was a closer relationship. Some DTaP vaccines given as fourth-dose boosters elicited antibody to PRN or FIM in some vaccinees, although the DTaP vaccines were not reported to contain these antigens; these responses were observed more frequently in DTwP-primed children. Agglutinin antibody rises were observed in all groups immunized with four doses of a DTaP vaccine containing FHA or PRN, regardless of whether the vaccine included FIM. Diphtheria and tetanus antibody levels exceeded the presumed protective concentration (0.1 IU/mL for diphtheria and 0.01 IU/mL for tetanus) after the fourth dose for all vaccinees.
                Although differences were observed in reaction rates among the DTaP vaccines given as a fourth dose, the DTaP vaccines were, in general, associated with fewer adverse events than a US-licensed DTwP. For DTaP vaccines, fever; irritability; and injection site pain, redness, and swelling occurred more frequently after the fourth dose than after the third dose of the same vaccine in the primary series. No DTaP was consistently most or least reactogenic or immunogenic. Although serologic correlates of pertussis immunity are not defined, it is clear that most DTaP vaccines can stimulate comparable or higher serum antibody responses than DTwP for those antigens contained in the vaccine. We compared the reactions and immunogenicity of DT acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines containing pertussis toxoid (PT) and filamentous haemagglutinin (FHA) (2-component DTaP) or PT, FHA and pertactin (PRN) (3-component DTaP vaccine) with a whole cell (DTwP) vaccine as a fourth-dose booster in 158 children (15-20 months old) who had received 3 primary vaccine doses with the same vaccines at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Randomization was 3:1 for DTaP:DTwP and all children received concomitant oral polio vaccine (OPV). Fever (> 38 degrees C), irritability, local injection site erythema (> 10 mm), swelling (> 10 mm), and pain (moderate or more) were assessed for 72 h after booster vaccination. DTwP vaccinees had a higher incidence of fever (29.4%) and injection-site pain (45.7%) than 3-component DTaP vaccinees (fever, 9.6%, p < 0.02; injection-site pain, 3.8%, p < 0.01); 2-component DTaP vaccinees had less injection-site pain (8.3%, p < 0.01). Pre- and post-vaccination immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Pre- and post anti-PT levels were similar for all 3 vaccine groups. Anti-FHA antibody was higher pre- and post-vaccination for both DTaP vaccine groups compared with the DTwP vaccinees (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). For 3-component DTaP vaccinees, anti-PRN antibody was higher pre- and post-vaccination compared to DTwP vaccinees (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Tetanus antibody was higher pre- and post-vaccination for DTwP versus both DTaP vaccine groups, and diphtheria antibody was similar pre- and post-vaccination for all 3 groups. These 2- and 3-component DTaP vaccines produce less common reactions and comparable or higher antibody to the components they contain (except tetanus) than DTwP vaccine when given as a booster to 15- to 20-month-old children previously primed with the same vaccine. An acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) containing pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin and the 69-kDa outer membrane protein (pertactin) was compared with United States-licensed whole cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) as a three dose sequence at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. Eighty infants were enrolled; 62 received DTaP and 18 received DTwP. Sixty-two infants had preimmunization and 1 month postimmunization sera available for pertussis antibodies. No infant experienced a serious adverse reaction. Significantly fewer infants in the DTaP group experienced irritability (P < 0.001) and moderate to severe injection site pain and redness (P < 0.001, and P = 0.03, respectively). The DTaP group also had significantly greater increases in geometric mean titers of antibodies against filamentous hemagglutinin (P < 0.001) and pertactin (P = 0.006). This three-component DTaP vaccine induced an antibody response to pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin but caused fewer adverse reactions than DTwP when administered as a primary series of immunization to 2-month-old infants. To compare the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and two-component acellular pertussis (ADTP) vaccine with a US-licensed whole-cell (WDTP) vaccine.
                General pediatric practice in suburban Rochester, NY.
                Prospective, double-blind, randomized study.
                One hundred ten infants were studied; 88 (80%) received ADTP and 22 (20%) received WDTP at ages 2, 4, and 6 months.
                Vaccination.
                Temperature of 38.3 degrees C or higher (P = .03) and moderate or severe injection-site pain (P = .02) occurred less frequently in infants receiving ADTP than those receiving WDTP for the combined three doses. Following the third dose, ADTP vaccination produced higher antibody responses than WDTP to pertussis toxin (geometric mean enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgG was 52.2 vs 12.5; P < .001) and to filamentous hemagglutinin (geometric mean IgG was 182.8 vs 3.5; P < .001). No interference in the diphtheria or tetanus antibody responses was observed in recipients of the ADTP vaccine.
                This two-component ADTP vaccine, when given as a primary infant series, produces fewer adverse effects and greater immunogenicity to the two pertussis components that it contains than US-licensed WDTP vaccine. This is the first study in children from the United States that evaluates the immunogenicity of and adverse reactions to the Connaught/Biken two-component acellular pertussis vaccine compared with whole-cell pertussis vaccine when given as a primary immunization series at 2, 4, and 6 months of age. Three hundred eighty infants were studied; 285 received acellular diphtheria-tetanus toxoids-pertussis (DTP (ADTP)) and 95 received whole-cell DTP (WDTP). Following the third dose, ADTP vaccination produced higher antibody responses than WDTP to lymphocytosis-promoting factor (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgG geometric mean titer (GMT) = 131 vs 9 and Chinese hamster ovary cell assay GMT = 273 vs 16) and to filamentous hemagglutinin (IgG GMT = 73 vs 10) (all P less than .0001). Agglutinin responses were higher in WDTP compared with ADTP recipients (GMT = 50 vs 37; P = .02). Local reactions were fewer for all three doses following ADTP vaccination. Fever, irritability, drowsiness, anorexia, vomiting, and unusual crying all occurred less frequently in ADTP compared with WDTP recipients for one or more of the three doses. We conclude that this two-component ADTP vaccine when given as a primary series produces greater immunogenicity and fewer adverse effects than the currently licensed WDTP vaccine. To compare the safety and immunogenicity of Lederle Laboratories' (Pearl River, NY) diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis (DTwP) vaccine when administered simultaneously with measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine and trivalent oral poliovirus (OPV) vaccine at 15 to 16 months of age.
                Randomized and double-blind.
                Two general pediatric practices.
                Ninety-seven infants, aged 15 to 16 months, who had received three previous DTwP immunizations. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS: Healthy children received the DTaP or DTwP vaccine. Infants received the MMR vaccine at a separate site and the OPV vaccine concurrently. Blood was obtained on day 0 and at 6 weeks. Adverse events were recorded by parents at specified times after immunization.
                Within 3 days of immunization, DTaP vaccine recipients had less fever, drowsiness, and irritability (P = .01, .04, .01, respectively). They also experienced less tenderness, erythema, and induration (.001, .001, and .002, respectively). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse reactions 6 to 14 days after immunization. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays were used to determine all antibody values. Antibody responses to filamentous hemagglutinin and pertussis toxoid were significantly greater in the DTaP group (P = .0001 and .02, respectively). Immune responses to the other measured antigens were similar.
                Simultaneous administration of the Lederle DTaP with MMR and OPV vaccines did not interfere with antibody response to pertussis antigens measured or measles, mumps, or rubella viruses and was associated with fewer local and systemic adverse events during the first 3 days following immunization when compared with the simultaneous administration of the DTwP, OPV, and MMR vaccines. We conclude that the DTaP vaccine can be administered at 15 months of age concurrently with the MMR and OPV vaccines. OBJECTIVE--To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine with a whole-cell diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (W-DTP) when administered as a booster to children 4 through 6 years of age. DESIGN--This was a randomized, double-blind study. SETTING--Children in this study were from three general pediatric practices (two were private, one was university-affiliated). PARTICIPANTS--Three hundred and sixteen 4- through 6-year-old children who had received four previous W-DTP immunizations at the recommended times were studied. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS--Children were randomly assigned in a 1:3 ratio to receive either W-DTP or one of three lots of acellular diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and pertussis vaccine (A-DTP). The A-DTPs contained 3.75 micrograms each of lymphocytosis promoting factor and filamentous hemagglutinin protein nitrogen per 0.5 mL and the same concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids as W-DTP. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 to 6 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents at 6, 24, 48, and 72 hours. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS--An indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method determined IgG antibody response to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and tetanus toxoid; a CHO cell assay measured neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin; and serum neutralization on VERO cells assayed diphtheria antitoxin. One month after booster doses were administered, the geometric mean antibody levels for A-DTP vs W-DTP were IgG filamentous hemagglutinin, 362 vs 104 ELISA U/mL; IgG lymphocytosis promoting factor, 408 vs 81 ELISA U/mL; CHO cell, 210 vs 107; diphtheria, 21.7 vs 12.1 U/mL; and tetanus, 2.86 vs 2.04 Eq/mL. Following immunization with A-DTP, local and systemic adverse experiences were 30% to 50% and 20% to 30% fewer, respectively, as compared with W-DTP. CONCLUSIONS--The BIKEN A-DTP vaccine used in this study demonstrates enhanced immunogenicity to lymphocytosis promoting factor, filamentous hemagglutinin, and other measured antigens and less reactogenicity compared with licensed W-DTP [corrected]. To compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and three-component acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP) with a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) when administered as a booster dose to infants 15 through 20 months of age.
                Randomized, double-blind, comparative study.
                Three pediatric practices (two private; one hospital-based).
                One hundred and sixty-five healthy 15- through 20-month old infants. SELECTION PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS: Infants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive vaccine from a single lot of DTaP or from commercially available DTwP. DTaP contained 25 micrograms of pertussis toxoid, 25 micrograms of filamentous hemagglutinin, 8 micrograms of pertactin (69-kilodalton outer membrane protein), 25 flocculating units of diphtheria toxoid, and 10 flocculating units of tetanus toxoid per 0.5-mL dose. DTwP contained one half the concentrations of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids compared with DTaP and a pertussis component with a potency of 4 U/0.5-mL dose. Serum samples were obtained on the day of immunization and 4 weeks later. Adverse reactions were recorded by parents for 7 days after immunization. An interval history was obtained 4 weeks after immunization.
                IgG antibody to pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, diphtheria toxoid, and tetanus toxoid was measured by an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. One month after immunization, the geometric mean antibody levels after DTaP compared with DTwP were: pertussis toxoid, 70.6 vs 28 ELISA U/mL (P = .003); filamentous hemagglutinin, 183.4 vs 43 ELISA U/mL (P < .001); pertactin, 216 vs 49.9 ELISA U/mL (P < .001); diphtheria, 14.1 vs 14.9 IU/mL (P = .74); and tetanus, 11.9 vs 14.8 IU/mL (P = .089). After immunization with DTaP, most local and systemic adverse experiences were significantly fewer compared with DTwP (P < .05).
                This three-component DTaP vaccine demonstrates significantly greater immune responses to pertussis toxoid, filamentous hemagglutinin, and pertactin, equivalent immune responses to diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, and significantly less reactogenicity compared with a licensed DTwP. Because of concern about safety and efficacy, no pertussis vaccine has been included in the vaccination program in Sweden since 1979. To provide data that might permit the reintroduction of a pertussis vaccine, we conducted a placebo-controlled trial of two acellular and one whole-cell pertussis vaccines.
                After informed consent was obtained, 9829 children born in 1992 were randomly assigned to receive one of four vaccines: a two-component acellular diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccine (2566 children), a five-component acellular DTP vaccine (2587 children), a whole-cell DTP vaccine licensed in the United States (2102 children), or (as a control) a vaccine containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DT) alone (2574 children). The vaccines were given at 2, 4, and 6 months of age, and the children were then followed for signs of pertussis for an additional 2 years (to a mean age of 21/2 years).
                The whole-cell vaccine was associated with significantly higher rates of protracted crying, cyanosis, fever, and local reactions than the other three vaccines. The rates of adverse events were similar for the acellular vaccines and the control DT vaccine. After three doses, the efficacy of the vaccines with respect to pertussis linked to a laboratory-confirmed case of pertussis or contact with an infected household member with paroxysmal cough for > or = 21 days was 58.9 percent for the two-component vaccine (95 percent confidence interval, 50.9 to 65.9 percent), 85.2 percent for the five-component vaccine (95 percent confidence interval, 80.6 to 88.8 percent), and 48.3 percent for the whole-cell vaccine (95 percent confidence interval, 37.0 to 57.6 percent).
                The five-component acellular pertussis vaccine we evaluated can be recommended for general use, since it has a favorable safety profile and confers sustained protection against pertussis. The two-component acellular vaccine and the whole-cell vaccine were less efficacious. To evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant acellular pertussis-diphtheria-tetanus (aPDT) vaccine (C-aPDT, Chiron/Biocine).
                This is a randomized blinded trial evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant aPDT vaccine (C-aPDT, Chiron/Biocine) in 2000 infant recipients compared with 498 controls who received whole cell diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (wDPT; Connaught) vaccine at 2, 4 and 6 months of age. In addition the safety and immunogenicity of the same C-aPDT vaccine were evaluated as a booster dose in a subset of the same population when given at 15 to 18 months of age and compared with licensed Lederle aPDT vaccine.
                The C-aPDT vaccine was associated with very few local or systemic reactions when compared with wDPT. In toddlers the local and systemic side effects observed were similar after either acellular vaccine. When the immunogenicity of the C-aPDT vaccine was compared with the wDPT (Connaught) in infancy, the vaccines were equivalent for anti-diphtheria response, the wDPT developed higher anti-tetanus response and the C-aPDT vaccine was significantly more immunogenic for all other antigens tested. In toddlers the C-aPDT acellular vaccine exhibited equal or improved immunogenicity for antigens tested as compared with Lederle aPDT except for a higher anti-filamentous hemagglutinin response with the Lederle aPDT vaccine.
                The Chiron/Biocine aPDT vaccine offers an improved safety profile as well as improved immunogenicity when compared with a licensed wDPT product. Concern about both safety and efficacy has made the use of whole-cell pertussis vaccines controversial. In some European countries, including Italy, the rate of vaccination against pertussis is low.
                We conducted a double-blind trial in Italy in which infants were randomly assigned to vaccination at two, four, and six months of age with an acellular pertussis vaccine together with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids (DTP); a DTP vaccine containing whole-cell pertussis (manufactured by Connaught Laboratories); or diphtheria and tetanus toxoids without pertussis (DT). The acellular DTP vaccine was either one containing filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and pertussis toxin inactivated with formalin and glutaraldehyde (SmithKline Beecham) or one with filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and genetically detoxified pertussis toxin (Chiron Biocine). Pertussis was defined as 21 days or more of paroxysmal cough, with infection confirmed by culture or serologic testing.
                The efficacy of each vaccine, given in three doses, against pertussis was determined for 14,751 children over an average of 17 months, with cases included in the analysis if cough began 30 days or more after the completion of immunization. For both of the acellular DTP vaccines, the efficacy was 84 percent (95 percent confidence intervals, 76 to 89 percent for Biocine DTP and 76 to 90 percent for SmithKline DTP), whereas the efficacy of the whole-cell DTP vaccine was only 36 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 14 to 52 percent). The antibody responses were greater to the acellular vaccines than to the whole-cell vaccine. Local and systemic adverse events were significantly more frequent after the administration of the whole-cell vaccine. For the acellular vaccines, the frequency of adverse events was similar to that in the control (DT) group.
                The two acellular DTP vaccines we studied were safe, immunogenic, and efficacious against pertussis, whereas the efficacy of the whole-cell DTP vaccine was unexpectedly low. A diphtheria and tetanus toxoid two-component acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP), consisting of 25 micrograms glutaraldehyde-detoxified pertussis toxin (PT) and 25 micrograms native filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), was compared with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid whole-cell pertussis vaccine (DTwP) in a randomized, double-blind manner in 286 Senegalese infants inoculated at two, four, and six months of age. In infants receiving DTaP a significantly lower rate of local reactions, crying and fever was observed than in infants receiving DTwP. One month after the third dose, the geometric mean titres for FHA antibodies were higher in the DTaP group, whereas increases in PT antibody titres were higher in the DTwP group. More than 90% of the infants had a fourfold or more increase in antibodies to both PT and FHA with either vaccine. Diphtheria, tetanus, and polio antibody responses were also measured and found to be comparable between the two groups. The results of this pilot study support the implementation of a field trial to compare the protective efficacy of these vaccines against pertussis in the same setting. At 2 months of age, 145 infants were randomized to receive either a two-component acellular pertussis vaccine [lymphocytosis-promoting factor (LPF)/filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA)] or standard whole-cell pertussis vaccine, each combined with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids, as their primary immunization series. Of the 132 subjects (91%) who completed the study, those receiving the acellular vaccine had significantly fewer adverse reactions: 5% vs 30% (local) and 17% vs 30% (systemic, including fever). During the first 24 hours acetaminophen usage, a general measure of adverse reactions, was lower in the test group. Overall, 35% of the acellular vaccine doses were reaction free vs 12% of the whole-cell doses. No serious reactions occurred in either group. Antibody responses to LPF and to FHA were significantly increased after the second and third immunizations with the test vaccine and were consistently higher than levels achieved with the standard vaccine. Thus the two-component acellular pertussis vaccine was associated with fewer adverse reactions and improved serologic responses to LPF and FHA as compared with the currently recommended whole-cell vaccine. We compared an acellular (B type) pertussis-component diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP-Ac) vaccine containing equal amounts of filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor with a conventional whole-cell vaccine as the first booster immunization in 162 healthy children 15 to 24 months of age. Fewer local reactions (e.g., erythema, swelling, and tenderness at the injection site) were seen in DTP-Ac vaccine recipients during the first 48 hours of observation. This group also had fewer episodes of fever (> or = 38 degrees C) and other systemic reactions (e.g., irritability, drowsiness, and anorexia). Overall, 57% of the DTP-Ac vaccine recipients had no obvious adverse reactions, in contrast to 5% in the comparison group. At 4 to 8 weeks after vaccination, serum antibody responses to filamentous hemagglutinin and lymphocytosis-promoting factor were greater in recipients of the acellular vaccine as determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We conclude that this B-type acellular vaccine is both immunogenic and much less likely to cause an adverse reaction than a currently licensed whole-cell vaccine, and is suitable for routine booster immunizing doses to protect against pertussis.
Multi-component (≥ three) aP vaccines are effective and show less adverse effects than wP vaccines for the primary series as well as for booster doses.