Comparisons between oral and intraperitoneal 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 therapy in children treated with peritoneal dialysis. Renal osteodystrophy in children on CAPD: a prospective trial of 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol therapy. Effect of oral calcitriol pulse therapy on the lipid, calcium, and glucose homeostasis of hemodialysis-patients: its safety in a combination with oral calcium carbonate. Dose-response study of 22-oxacalcitriol in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Intermittent calcitriol therapy in secondary hyperparathyroidism: a comparison between oral and intraperitoneal administration. Controlled trial of the effects of 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol in patients treated with regular dialysis. Intravenous vitamin D therapy reduces PTH-(1-84)/large C fragments ratio in chronic hemodialysis patients. Pulse oral versus pulse intraperitoneal calcitriol: a comparison of efficacy in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy in peritoneal dialysis patients. Suppression of parathyroid hormone secretion in hemodialysis patients by a novel vitamin D analogue: 19-nor-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2. Comparative effect of oral pulse and intravenous calcitriol treatment in hemodialysis patients: the effect on serum IL-1 and IL-6 levels and bone mineral density. Safety and efficacy of pulse and daily calcitriol in patients on CAPD: a randomized trial. Prevention of hyperparathyroidism in patients on maintenance dialysis by intravenous 1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 in association with Mg(OH)2 as sole phosphate binder. A randomized comparative study with the association CaCO3 +/- Mg(OH)2. Low calcium dialysate and high-dose oral calcitriol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in haemodialysis patients. Initial dosing of paricalcitol based on PTH levels in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Prospective comparison of the effects of maxacalcitol and calcitriol in chronic hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a multicenter, randomized crossover study. Paricalcitol dosing according to body weight or severity of hyperparathyroidism: a double-blind, multicenter, randomized study. Comparison of the effects of calcitriol and maxacalcitol on secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on chronic haemodialysis: a randomized prospective multicentre trial. Comparative efficacy of oral and intravenous calcitriol treatment in haemodialysis patients: effects on serum biochemistry and cytokine levels. Comparison of intermittent and continuous oral administration of calcitriol in dialysis patients: a randomized prospective trial. Comparison of intermittent oral and intravenous calcitriol in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Comparison of 1 alpha-OH-vitamin D3 and high doses of calcium carbonate for the control of hyperparathyroidism and hyperaluminemia in patients on maintenance dialysis. Assessment of combined 24,25(OH)2D3 and 1 alpha (OH)D3 therapy for bone disease in dialysis patients. Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of pulse oral versus intravenous calcitriol in hemodialysis patients. 19-Nor-1-alpha-25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 (Paricalcitol) safely and effectively reduces the levels of intact parathyroid hormone in patients on hemodialysis. Double-blind trial of oral 1,25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 versus placebo in asymptomatic hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis. Controlled trial of calcitriol in hemodialysis patients. A controlled trial of the early treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism with calcitriol in hemodialysis patients. Intravenous calcitriol for treatment of hyperparathyroidism in children on hemodialysis. Comparison of the efficacy of two injectable forms of vitamin D3 and oral one-alpha in treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Intravenous paricalcitol for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in children on hemodialysis. Effect of 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol on intestinal absorption of calcium and phosphate and on parathyroid hormone secretion in chronic renal failure. Inhibition of parathyroid hormone: a dose equivalency study of paricalcitol and doxercalciferol. Effect of the mode of calcitriol administration on PTH-ionized calcium relationship in uraemic patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Calcitriol in dialysis patients. Prospective trial of pulse oral versus intravenous calcitriol treatment of hyperparathyroidism in ESRD. Controlled trial of falecalcitriol versus alfacalcidol in suppression of parathyroid hormone in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. Twice versus thrice weekly administration of intravenous calcitriol in dialysis patients: a randomized prospective trial. Gruppo Italiano di Studio dell'Osteodistrofia Renale. Clinical effect of intravenous calcitriol administration on secondary hyperparathyroidism. A double-blind study among 4 doses. Comparison of treatments for mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients. Durham Renal Osteodystrophy Study Group. 'Pulse oral' versus intravenous calcitriol therapy in chronic hemodialysis patients. A prospective and randomized study. A randomized trial of intermittent versus continuous oral alfacalcidol treatment of hyperparathyroidism in end-stage renal disease. Intermittent doxercalciferol (1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D(2)) therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism. A comparison of oral and intravenous alfacalcidol in the treatment of uremic hyperparathyroidism. Paricalcitol versus calcitriol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism with intermittent oral high doses of 1-alpha-OHD3 plus pharmacological dose of 24,25(OH)2D3. The effect of peroral calcitriol in small doses on mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients on hemodialysis. A placebo-controlled trial to evaluate immunomodulatory effects of paricalcitol.
Recent studies in adults have suggested that parenteral 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25[OH]2D3) may have advantages over oral therapy in the management of renal osteodystrophy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were clear differences between oral and IP 1,25(OH)2D3 treatments in children who did not pose a treatment problem. Seven children (5 males, 2 females, aged 1.8 to 16 years, median 4.8 years) undergoing peritoneal dialysis were initially treated with oral 1,25(OH)2D3 for a one month equilibration period They were randomly assigned to 3 months of either oral or intraperitoneal (IP) therapy with 1,25(OH)2D3 followed by 3-months-treatment using the alternative route. No significant differences in serum creatinine, phosphate, or parathyroid hormone concentrations were found between the different routes of administration in the patients. No significant differences in height standard deviation scores or renal osteodystrophy scores were found over the six-month study. Paired oral and IP pharmacokinetic studies were performed on these 7 patients and 2 other children who had been treated for at least 2 months using either oral or IP 1,25(OH)2D3. Serum was taken prior to one of the usual 1,25(OH)2D3 doses and 0.5, 1.5, 3, 6, and 24 h afterward. The highest measured concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3 were found at 1.5 h for both oral and IP treatments (mean Cmax [SD]: oral 116 [23] pmol/l, IP 121 [24] pmol/l, p > 0.05). The AUC's for oral and IP therapy were similar (1701 [276] and 1645 [301] pmol/h/l, respectively). In the paired pharmacokinetic studies no significant differences were found between oral and IP treatments for the serum half life (27.4 [11.6] h and 19.2 [8.1] h, respectively) and total body clearance (15.3 [2.1] h and 18.4 [3.3] h, respectively) of 1,25(OH)2D3. In children who respond appropriately to oral 1,25(OH)2D3 there is no biological advantage to the use of IP 1,25(OH)2D3. The efficacy of 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol in the prevention of renal osteodystrophy in children commencing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis was studied in 12 patients, 0.8-17 years of age, who were randomly assigned to either group I receiving standard therapy or to group II receiving in addition 10-20 ng/kg body weight/day of 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol. Calcium carbonate compounds were used to control hyperphosphataemia. Mean plasma calcium (total and ionised) and phosphate levels were not significantly different between the two groups. All group I patients continued to have elevated plasma immunoreactive parathyroid hormone levels at 6 months compared to only 1 patient in group II (p less than 0.05). Four patients in group I developed subperiosteal erosions on radiography compared to the healing of mild lesions in 2 patients in group II. Bone histomorphometry on iliac crest needle biopsy specimens revealed a significant reduction in osteoid index and seam width in group II. Serum aluminum levels decreased during the course of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, and the significant staining for bone aluminum in 6 patients at the beginning of the study was no longer present in 5 patients at 6 months. Our data demonstrate that 1 alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol is beneficial in the prevention and treatment of bone disease in children on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. To more clearly elucidate the conflicting results that have been obtained after oral calcitriol pulse therapy on lipid, glucose, and calcium levels in hemodialysis (HD) patients, and to determine safety of oral calcitriol pulse therapy in a combination with calcium carbonate.
                A randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled study.
                HD centers in 3 teaching university hospitals.
                Forty-eight chronic HD patients.
                HD patients were randomized into 2 groups. Each group (n = 24), in addition to 4.5 g calcium carbonate daily, received either oral calcitriol pulse therapy or placebo twice weekly at the end of HD, sessions for 3 months, after which the 2 therapeutic groups were crossed-over, and for an additional 3 months, the calcitriol group received placebo, and the placebo group was put on calcitriol. Serum triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), total calcium, alkaline phosphatase, proteins, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone (PTH), blood pH, and glucose were measured at random and at the end of 3 and 6 months of the trial.
                After calcitriol therapy, triglyceride, serum PTH, total alkaline phosphatase, and fasting blood sugar significantly decreased, but total serum calcium significantly increased, whereas other examined parameters remained unchanged compared with the other groups. Calcium, phosphorus, calcium x phosphorus product, PTH levels, and all of these parameters were optimized in 18 (37.5%), 22 (45.8%), 34 (70.8%), 30 (62.5%), and 12 (%25) cases, respectively, in the calcitriol groups. No significant side effect was seen during the trial.
                Our findings indicate that short-term oral calcitriol pulse therapy in combination with calcium carbonate is safe and beneficial for metabolic abnormalities of HD patients; however, its safety for prolonged therapy is yet to be proved.
                Copyright 2003 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc. The dose-response relationships and the safety of administering 22-oxacalcitriol (OCT) to patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT) under regular three-times-weekly hemodialysis (HD) were evaluated by double-blind parallel group design. A total of 203 patients with 2HPT were randomly allocated into four groups, and 5 microg (Group L), 10 microg (Group M), or 15 microg (Group H) OCT, or placebo (Group P) was administrated at the end of every HD for 12 weeks. Reductions of intact-parathyroid hormone (iPTH) concentration greater than 30% from baseline were observed in 7.7% of Group P as compared to 77.3% of the pooled OCT groups after 12 weeks of treatment (Mantel test: P < 0.001). Time-trends (slopes) of log-iPTH concentration calculated by least-squares line fitting to each patient's data during treatment differed between Group P and the pooled OCT groups (t-test: P < 0.001) and these iPTH slopes decreased dose-dependently (linear trend by t-test: P < 0.001). Slopes of serum calcium corrected for albumin (corrected-sCa) concentrations also differed between Group P and the pooled OCT groups (t-test: P < 0.001), and increased dose-dependently (linear trend by t-test: P < 0.0001). Serum phosphorus and Ca x P product increased significantly only in high dose groups. Slopes of log(iPTH) and corrected-sCa concentrations were reciprocally related. Most adverse events were hypercalcemia and dose-related, but occasionally comprised pruritus or increased serum creatinine phosphokinase. These results indicate that OCT produced a strong and dose-dependent suppression of PTH and an increase of corrected-sCa concentration in patients with 2HPT. The recommended initial dosages of OCT would appear to be 5 microg when pretreatment iPTH concentrations are less than 500 pg/mL, and 10 microg when greater than 500 pg/mL for safe and effective treatment. As in the case of PTH, calcium and phosphorus showed dose-dependent increases. It is therefore essential to take precautions as to possible increases in calcium and phosphorus. Intermittent oral or intravenous doses of calcitriol given two or three times per week are commonly used to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism (secondary HPT). This study was undertaken to compare the biochemical and skeletal responses to thrice weekly intraperitoneal (i.p.) versus oral doses of calcitriol in children with secondary HPT undergoing peritoneal dialysis (CCPD).
                Forty-six patients aged 12.5+/-4.8 years on CCPD for 22+/-25 months were randomly assigned to treatment with oral (p.o.) or i.p. calcitriol for 12 months; 17 subjects given p.o. calcitriol and 16 subjects given i.p. calcitriol completed the study. Bone biopsies were performed at the beginning and at the end of the study, while determinations of serum and total ionized calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase, parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcitriol levels were done monthly.
                Serum total and ionized calcium levels were higher in subjects treated with i.p. calcitriol, P < 0.0001, whereas serum phosphorus levels were higher in those given p.o. calcitriol, P < 0.0001. For the i.p. group, serum PTH levels decreased from pre-treatment values of 648+/-125 pg/ml to a nadir of 169+/-57 pg/ml after nine months. In contrast, serum PTH levels did not change from baseline values of 670+/-97 pg/ml in subjects given p.o. calcitriol, P < 0.0001 by multiple regression analysis. Serum alkaline phosphatase levels were also lower in patients treated with i.p. calcitriol, P < 0.0001, but there was no difference between groups in the average dose of calcitriol given thrice weekly. The skeletal lesions of secondary HPT improved in both groups, 33% of patients developed adynamic bone lesion.
                Differences in the bioavailability of calcitriol and/or in phosphorus metabolism may account for the divergent biochemical response to p.o. and i.p. calcitriol. In a double-blind controlled study, 15 patients received 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25[OH]2D3) (0.5-1.5 microgram/day) and 16 patients received vitamin D3 (D3) (400-1,200 IU/day). The patients receiving 1,25(OH)2D3 had a rise in mean serum calcium concentration from 9.05 +/- 0.15 to 10.25 +/- 0.20 mg/dl (p less than .001) with a return to 9.37 +/- 0.16 (p less than .001) in the post-control period; however, hypercalcemia (greater than 11.5 mg/dl) occurred in 5 of 15 patients. Likewise, patients who received 1,25(OH)2D3 but not those given D3 had a reversible decrease in immunoreactive parathyroid levels. 9 of 12 patients given D3 had serial iliac crest bipsies showing histologic deterioration, while 6 of 7 patients who received 1,25(OH)2D3 were improved or unchanged (p less than 0.025). Bone mineral and calcium content decreased in patients on D3 (p less than .05) but not in those on 1,25(OH)2D3. We conclude that the administration of 1,25(OH)2D3 to dialysis patients: (1) has a calcemic effect. (2) decreases levels of immunoreactive parathyroid hormone, and (3) is associated with histologic improvement in bone disease. Renal osteodystrophy is one of the major complications in patients with chronic renal failure. Large C-PTH fragments are secreted from the parathyroid glands and exert antagonistic actions against PTH-(1-84). The PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio reflects both biosynthesis and processing of PTH; however the alteration of the ratio under vitamin D therapy has not been investigated.
                Seventeen hemodialysis patients with intact PTH levels of >300 pg/ml were enrolled. Calcitriol or maxacalcitol were administered intravenously for 78 weeks. Intact PTH, PTH-(1-84), and the PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio were measured at 0, 13, 26, 52 and 78 weeks.
                Intact PTH and PTH-(1-84) levels, which were 492.0 +/- 115.7 and 303.4 +/- 105.4 pg/ml, respectively, at baseline, significantly decreased at the end of the study to 268.9 +/- 121.9 (p < 0.0001) and 190.7 +/- 106.9 pg/ml (p = 0.0008), respectively. In contrast, large C-PTH fragments, which were 152.7 +/- 53.5 pg/ml at baseline, did not significantly change at 78 weeks (144.5 +/- 72.2 pg/ml, p = 0.7612). Consequently, the PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio was significantly reduced from 2.25 +/- 1.31 to 1.47 +/- 0.89 (p = 0.0004).
                The PTH-(1-84)/large C-PTH fragments ratio reflects the change of PTH biosynthesis, processing and secretion from the parathyroid glands, and it may be a beneficial marker to evaluate the overall biological PTH action and predict bone turnover status in hemodialysis patients under intravenous vitamin D therapy.
                Copyright (c) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel. Controversy exists among various studies in regard to the efficacy of oral (p.o.) versus parenteral calcitriol. Some studies suggest that intravenous (i.v.) calcitriol is superior to p.o. calcitriol for treating renal osteodystrophy in hemodialysis patients; others suggest that these routes of administration are equivalent. To our knowledge, no large, prospective, randomized study compares intraperitoneal (i.p.) to p.o. calcitriol in adult peritoneal dialysis patients. We conducted a prospective randomized study in 76 patients (38 on i.p. calcitriol and 38 on p.o. calcitriol), whom we followed for 48 months. Of the 76 patients, 34 (18 in the i.p. group and 16 in the p.o. group) completed the 48-month study period. Calcitriol dosing was similar in both groups (3-6 micrograms per week in three divided doses). Dose adjustments were made depending on levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), serum calcium, phosphorus, and calcitriol. No significant difference was seen between the groups in regard to age, sex, race, body mass index, dialysis duration, or cause of ESRD. Neither was any difference in the incidence of peritonitis seen between the groups. In the first 3-6 months, PTH decreased equivalently in both groups. The PTH level remained suppressed in the i.p. group throughout the remainder of the study, but, in the p.o. group, PTH returned to its pretreatment level after 3-6 months. Mean serum calcium was not different in the two groups. In the p.o. group, a considerably higher mean follow-up phosphorus level (6.8 +/- 2.3 mg/dL versus 4.7 +/- 1.4 mg/dL, p = 0.008), PTH level (384 +/- 146 pg/mL versus 162 +/- 64 pg/mL; p = 0.005), and alkaline phosphatase level (178 +/- 37 IU/L versus 72 +/- 21 IU/L, p = 0.02) were seen as compared to the i.p. group. In the i.p. group, resolution of osteodystrophy occurred in all patients at the end of the study; in the p.o. group, 5 patients maintained or developed osteodystrophy by the end of the study (p = 0.016). We conclude that i.p. calcitriol is more effective than pulse p.o. calcitriol in lowering PTH and alkaline phosphatase levels and in resolving renal osteodystrophy, and that i.p. calcitriol is associated with a lower incidence of hyperphosphatemia and elevated Ca x PO4 byproduct. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multicenter study, 35 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing maintenance hemodialysis were treated three times weekly for 4 weeks with either 19-nor-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D2 (paricalcitol) intravenously at doses ranging from 0.04 to 0.24 microg/kg or placebo. Eligible patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT; intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH] level > 300 pg/mL) were initially withdrawn from any existing vitamin D therapy over a 4-week washout period and then randomized to treatment for 4 weeks with either paricalcitol or placebo. Overall, there was a clinically and statistically significant reduction in iPTH level for patients receiving paricalcitol compared with placebo (P = 0.006). The study end point for efficacy was at least a 30% reduction from maximum baseline in iPTH level for 75% of the patients receiving paricalcitol per dosing group. The study end point for efficacy was at least a 30% reduction from maximum baseline in iPTH for 75% of patients receiving paricalcitol per dosing group. Sixty-eight percent (15 of 22) of patients receiving paricalcitol attained this efficacy end point regardless of dosage received (0.04, 0.08, 0.16, and 0.24 microg/kg). Eighty-three percent (5 of 6) of the patients in each of the paricalcitol groups receiving 0.16- and 0.24-microg/kg dosages attained the efficacy end point. Only two patients receiving placebo attained the iPTH end point. There were no clinically relevant differences in serum calcium (Ca) or phosphorus (P) levels between the group treated with paricalcitol and that treated with placebo. Although there was a statistically significant difference between the change from baseline to final-visit Ca levels in the paricalcitol group and the placebo group (P < 0.001), the final-visit mean Ca level in the paricalcitol group was within the normal range (9.44 mg/dL). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for the change from baseline in P level (P = 0.625). Only one patient treated with paricalcitol developed hypercalcemia before or coincident with the iPTH end point. Three other patients receiving paricalcitol experienced elevated serum Ca levels subsequent to reaching the iPTH end point, with iPTH reductions of 83% to 98%. There were no significant differences between patients treated with paricalcitol and patients treated with placebo in adverse reactions. These results show that paricalcitol safely and effectively reduces iPTH levels in hemodialysis patients with secondary HPT. Increased serum levels of bone-resorptive cytokines such as interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) have been implicated for changes in bone remodeling in hemodialysis patients. In this prospective randomized study, we aimed to compare the effect of oral and intravenous (IV) pulse calcitriol on serum levels of IL-1 beta and IL-6.
                Twenty-eight hemodialysis patients were included and consecutively randomized to receive either oral (n = 14, M/F = 7/7, mean age 42 +/- 15 years) or IV pulse (n = 14, M/F = 6/8, mean age 38 +/- 14 years) calcitriol treatment. No difference was found between groups for age, sex distribution, primary renal disease, mean time on hemodialysis and baseline biochemical parameters including serum levels of IL-1 beta and IL-6.
                The percent fall of intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) was significantly less with oral compared to IV calcitriol between 0 and the 3rd month (32 +/- 21 vs. 56 +/- 28%, p = 0.03). However, the percent fall in iPTH at the 6th month of the therapy was not different in the oral group compared to the IV group (57 +/- 22 vs. 73 +/- 24%, p = 0.12). The increase in bone mineral densities was higher in the IV group than the oral group. Oral and IV calcitriol caused a significant fall in IL-1 beta (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively) and IL-6 levels (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001, respectively) at the 6th month of treatment. The percent fall in serum IL-6 levels at the 6th month was significantly greater in the IV compared to the oral group (61 +/- 18 vs. 36 +/- 33%, p = 0.04), while the percent changes in serum IL-1 beta levels were similar.
                IV calcitriol therapy has a greater suppression of PTH at the 3rd month of the therapy. Despite no difference in serum PTH levels at the 6th month, IV therapy has a greater increase in bone mineral densities and a greater decrease in serum IL-6 levels. These findings suggest IV calcitriol treatment has a superior effect on bone remodeling by influencing the levels of bone-resorptive cytokines as compared to the oral therapy group, beyond its suppressive effect on iPTH.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel Calcitriol therapy is the mainstay of therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Oral administration of calcitriol is necessary in CAPD patients, but no studies have directly compared different routes of administration in this patient population.
                To determine if the peak serum calcitriol level (pulse therapy) is more important than the total delivered dose, we randomized CAPD patients with mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism to receive either pulse (3.0 microg twice a week, n = 10) or daily (0.75 microg a day, n = 8) oral calcitriol in comparable weekly doses. The main comparison was the rate of decline of serum intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels to reach the desired end-point of 100 pg/ml. The patients were dialysed with low-calcium dialysate and received only calcium-containing phosphate binders.
                Pharmacokinetic analysis after a single dose of 3.0 microg (pulse) vs 0.75 microg (daily) revealed 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D levels to be higher in the pulse group at 3 and 6 h, but equivalent by 12 h. The area under the curve for 1 week of daily and 1 week of pulse therapy was equal. The patients in the 2 arms had equivalent basal serum levels of PTH (pulse = 562 +/- 291 vs daily = 454 +/- 113 pg/ml), calcium (pulse = 2.32 +/- 0.20 vs daily = 2.32 +/- 0.12 mmol/l) and phosphorus (pulse = 1.32 +/- 0.52 vs daily = 1.35 +/- 0.26 mmol/l). The time required for the PTH to decrease to 100 pg/ml and the rate of decline in PTH were similar (time: pulse = 14.2 +/- 6.8 weeks, daily = 12.2 +/- 7 weeks; rate: pulse = 7.4 +/- 4.2 vs daily = 8.4 +/- 4.2% PTH/week; P = NS). The serum calcium increased similarly in both groups. Hypercalcaemia (> 2.9 mmol/l) was rare (pulse = 3, daily = 2 episodes).
                This study demonstrates that pulse and daily calcitriol are similarly effective and safe for the treatment of mild to moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism in CAPD patients despite higher peak levels of 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D with pulse therapy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the place of intravenous 1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 (1 alpha-OH-D3) in the prevention of radiologically obvious hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in patients on maintenance dialysis while excluding aluminium phosphate binder and using a dialysate calcium concentration of 1.62 mmol which keeps the intradialytic calcium balance neutral. Therefore, 47 patients without subperiosteal resorption and previously treated by oral CaCO3 and if necessary Mg(OH)2 as phosphate binder while their dialysate calcium had a Ca level of 1.62 and a Mg level of 0.2 mmol/l were randomized into a control group of 24 who were maintained on the same treatment and an experimental group of 23. This group discontinued CaCO3 and received intravenous 1 alpha-OH-D3 after each dialysis at increasing doses up to 4 micrograms and increased Mg(OH)2 as their sole phosphate binder. When plasma Ca increased above 2.7 mmol/l, the dose of 1 alpha-OH-D3 was decreased. When plasma PO4 increased above 2 mmol/l, the dose of Mg(OH)2 was increased to the highest dose not inducing diarrhea, hypermagnesemia (less than 2 mmol/l) or hyperkalemia (less than 6 mmol/l). In case of persistent hyperphosphatemia, the dose of 1 alpha-OH-D3 was decreased. Since mean plasma alkaline phosphatase was normal, HPT was monitored on the plasma concentration of 1-84 PTH for which a previous histological study showed that frank osteitis fibrosa was present only when they were above 70 pg/ml, i.e. (about twice the upper limit of the normal value). Before the study, plasma PTH was below this limit in 16 patients of the CaCO3 group and in 14 patients of the 1 alpha-OH-D3 group. After 6 months, they remained below this limit in all patients except 2 of each group. Plasma PTH was initially above 70 pg/ml in 8 of the CaCO3 and did not change significantly throughout the study, 2 patients having at 6 months a PTH level below 70 pg/ml. In contrast with intravenous 1 alpha-OH-D3, all the 9 patients with initial frank HPT decreased their PTH levels after 2 months, the levels being below 70 pg/ml in 6 cases. However, because of hypercalcemia and/or of hyperphosphatemia in spite of a highest tolerable dose of Mg(OH)2, 1 alpha-OH-D3 doses had to be decreased down to 0.4 microgram per dialysis at the 6th month so that at 6 months 6 of 9 patients had their PTH levels above 70 pg/ml, a number comparable to that of patients treated with CaCO3 (6 of 8).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS) We treated nineteen haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism with increasing oral doses of 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol (calcitriol) over a 12-week period and used low calcium dialysate (1.0 mmol/l) to prevent hypercalcaemia. Nine patients received daily calcitriol and ten received calcitriol thrice weekly, and at the end of the study the mean doses were 2.0 micrograms daily and 2.6 micrograms thrice weekly respectively. The regimen was well tolerated with nine episodes of mild hypercalcaemia, none of which were symptomatic. Mean PTH and alkaline phosphatase concentrations decreased from 62.0 pmol/l (15-125) to 22.0 pmol/l(1-70) (P less than 0.01), and 144 IU/l (48-461) to 123 IU/l (61-346) (P less than 0.05) respectively. Mean serum calcium increased from 2.33 mmol/l (2.05-2.55) to 2.52 mmol/l (2.26-2.67) (P less than 0.01). There were no significant changes in serum phosphate, magnesium, or aluminium concentrations and there were no significant differences in outcome between patients receiving daily therapy compared to those receiving it thrice weekly. A combination of high-dose oral calcitriol and low calcium dialysate can reverse secondary hyperparathyroidism without causing hypercalcaemia and these results suggest a benefit over conventional low-dose calcitriol. Adjustment of the initial dose of paricalcitol in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) on the basis of severity of SHPT generally is preferred in current practice. Whether the proposed dose, based on the formula baseline intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH [picograms per milliliter]) divided by 80, is the most appropriate has not been assessed adequately.
                A double-blind randomized trial comparing iPTH/80 dose with the immediately lower iPTH/120 dose was undertaken. Forty-three hemodialysis patients with iPTH levels between 300 and 900 pg/mL (300 and 900 ng/L) were followed up for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was control of iPTH levels within a target range between 150 and 300 pg/mL (150 and 300 ng/L).
                No difference between the 2 dose groups was noted in time to achieve target iPTH levels of 150 to 300 pg/mL (150 to 300 ng/L). More episodes of excessive decrease in iPTH levels occurred in the iPTH/80 group compared with the iPTH/120 group (P = 0.003). Nine patients in the iPTH/80 group (45%) versus 2 patients in the iPTH/120 group (10%) had iPTH levels less than 150 pg/mL (<150 ng/L) in at least half the measurements performed during the second half of the study (P = 0.034). Increases in calcium levels were greater in the iPTH/80 group at all times during the study (P < 0.05 at weeks 4 and 10). The number of required dose reductions was significantly greater in the iPTH/80 group compared with the iPTH/120 group (P = 0.008).
                In hemodialysis patients with SHPT, a lower initial dose of iPTH/120 shows efficacy similar to that of the already widely used iPTH/80 scheme in reaching target iPTH levels (150 to 300 pg/mL [150 to 300 ng/L]), with less required dose adjustments, lower increase in calcium levels, and lower cost. In addition, the initial dose of paricalcitol based on the iPTH/80 formula leads significantly more patients to excessive suppression of iPTH (<150 pg/mL [<150 ng/L]) than the iPTH/120 dose. Maxacalcitol is a vitamin D analogue, which is administered intravenously for secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients as well as calcitriol. However, few dose-comparison clinical studies have been reported for these drugs. The present multicenter, randomized crossover study was conducted to determine the equivalence of maxacalcitol and calcitriol doses.
                Subjects comprised 31 patients on chronic hemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism who had not received maxacalcitol or calcitriol in the previous 3 months. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, and maxacalcitol or calcitriol was administered in a crossover design for 12 weeks each. Maxacalcitol and calcitriol doses were adjusted based on serum levels of calcium and intact parathyroid hormone.
                After the 12-week maxacalcitol/calcitriol administration, there were no significant differences in levels of calcium (maxacalcitol 2.40+/-0.22 mmol/1 (9.6+/-0.9 mg/dl), calcitriol 2.42 + 0.25 mmol/l (9.7+/-1.0 mg/dl), p = 0.71), phosphate (maxacalcitol 1.97 + 0.42 mmol/l (6.1+/-1.3 mg/dl), calcitriol 2.00+/-0.48 mmol/l (6.2+/-1.5 mg/dl), p = 0.64), intact parathyroid hormone (maxacalcitol 267+/-169 pg/ml, calcitriol 343+/-195 pg/ml, p = 0.11) in serum or other bone-metabolic parameters such as serum alkaline phosphatase. The doses ofmaxacalcitol and calcitriol were 49.3+/-23.7 microg/month and 9.0+/-3.8 microg/month, respectively, and maxacalcitol : calcitriol dose ratio was 5.5: 1. No severe adverse reactions were seen for either maxacalcitol or calcitriol during the study period.
                Comparable therapeutic efficacy can be obtained in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism using either maxacalcitol or calcitriol at a dose ratio of 5.5 : 1. Vitamin D therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis therapy has relied on patient dry weight to determine the initial dose of medication. Obtaining a patient's dry weight can be difficult, and no correlation has been established between a patient's body weight and severity of secondary hyperparathyroidism. We conducted a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, 12-week, multicenter trial to compare the incidence of hypercalcemia (single occurrence) between two dosing regimens: one regimen based on baseline intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH; PTH/80) level, and the other regimen based on patient body weight (0.04 microgram/kg). One hundred twenty-five adult patients with ESRD on maintenance hemodialysis therapy were enrolled at multiple sites. Before treatment, all patients were required to have PTH levels of 300 pg/mL or greater, calcium levels of 8.0 mg/dL or greater and 10.5 mg/dL or less, and a calcium x phosphorus (Ca x P) product of 70 or less. Patients were randomized to one of two regimens: the nonrandomized treatment was also administered as a placebo dummy. No incidence of hypercalcemia occurred in either treatment group during the study. Patients treated according to the formula iPTH/80 required fewer dose adjustments and achieved the first of four consecutive reductions from baseline PTH level of 30% or greater more rapidly than patients treated based on body weight (P = 0.0306). Incidences of elevated Ca x P product levels were similar between treatment groups. Treatment with paricalcitol injection based on degree of secondary hyperparathyroidism incurred no greater risk for hypercalcemia and achieved meaningful therapeutic results with fewer dose adjustments than dosing based on patient body weight. To identify differences between the effects of calcitriol and the calcitriol analogue, maxacalcitol, on parathyroid hormone (PTH) and bone metabolisms, we conducted a randomized prospective multicentre study on patients on chronic haemodialysis.
                We randomly assigned 91 patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism [intact PTH (iPTH) > or =150 pg/ml] to have either calcitriol (47 patients) or maxacalcitol (44 patients) therapy, for 12 months after a 1 month control period. Serum electrolytes, bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP), iPTH, total PTH and PTH(1-84) (whole PTH) levels were measured periodically. The first end point was a serum iPTH of <150 pg/ml, the second was the iPTH levels obtained.
                Treatment was discontinued for various reasons in nine patients in each group, but no serious side effects were observed in either group. The numbers of cases reaching the first end point were not significantly different between the two groups. Serum calcium concentration was significantly higher in the maxacalcitol than the calcitriol group during early treatment, but not at the end of treatment. Throughout the treatment period there were no significant differences between the two groups in serum iPTH, inorganic phosphate, the product of the serum calcium and inorganic phosphorus concentrations, bAP, or the ratio of whole PTH to total PTH minus whole PTH. Nor were the changes in these parameters significantly different between the two groups comparing the patients with moderate to severe hyperparathyroidism (basal iPTH > or =500 pg/ml).
                Calcitriol and maxacalcitol are equally effective on PTH and bone metabolism. This study compared the effects of oral and intravenous calcitriol on serum biochemistry parameters and levels of bone-resorptive cytokines in haemodialysis patients. Patients were randomized to receive oral (n = 18) or intravenous (n = 16) calcitriol treatment for 6 months. Serum levels of total calcium, ionized calcium, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), magnesium, alkaline phosphatase, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin (IL)-1 and IL-6 were measured at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment. After treatment, serum levels of iPTH, total calcium, ionized calcium, TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 were not significantly different from baseline. The intravenous calcitriol treatment group showed significant decreases in levels of iPTH, TNF-alpha, IL-1 and IL-6 and a significant increase in total calcium level after 3 and 6 months. There was no significant change in serum ionized calcium levels. Significantly decreased serum alkaline phosphatase and magnesium levels were found in both treatment groups after 3 and 6 months. In conclusion, intravenous calcitriol treatment has a significant depressive effect on iPTH and bone-resorptive cytokines in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Intermittent bolus administration of calcitriol--i.e., 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol or 1,25-(OH)2D3--is highly efficacious in dialysis patients. In experimental studies, intermittent administration of calcitriol is superior to continuous administration in suppressing preproparathyroid hormone (PTH) mRNA and circulating PTH concentrations. In a randomized, prospective, open multicenter trial 45 dialysis patients with elevated 1,84-iPTH (> or = 20 pmol/l, normal 1-6 pmol/l) levels were randomly allocated to daily administration of 0.75 microgram calcitriol (continuous) or twice weekly administration (intermittent); the two protocols provided an identical total weekly doses of 5.25 micrograms calcitriol. Patients were dialyzed with a dialysate Ca concentration of 1.75 mmol/l and had oral CaCO3 or Ca acetate. 1,84-iPTH (immunoradiometric assay) and serum Ca and Pi levels were measured weekly. At the beginning of the study, the median 1,84-iPTH value was 37 pmol/l (range 20-115) in the intermittent versus 36 pmol/l (range 21-72) in the continuous calcitriol group. After 2 weeks, the median 1,84-iPTH level was 18.5 pmol/l (range 1.4-106) versus 18 pmol/l (range 1.2-48). After 12 weeks, 11 of 21 of the patients in the intermittent and 18 of 24 patients in the continuous group had reached the treatment goal, i.e., 1,84-iPTH < or = 10 pmol/l without hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia. There were seven episodes of hypercalcemia (> 2.7 mmol/l) in the intermittent versus two in the continuous group; the mean peak Ca level was 2.8 mmol/l (range 2.76-3.0) versus 2.9 mmol/l (range 2.74-3.06). There were 21 versus 17 episodes, respectively, of hyperphosphatemia (> 2.2 mmol/l). Both intermittent intravenous and intermittent oral calcitriol have been shown to be effective in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients and it has been claimed that intravenous calcitriol causes less hypercalcemia. However, there has been no published systematic comparison of the two routes of administration of intermittent calcitriol. Therefore in a prospective crossover study 11 (9 male) patients on maintenance hemodialysis were randomized to receive intravenous followed by oral calcitriol for 4 months each, or oral followed by intravenous calcitriol, commencing at 2 micrograms postdialysis three times per week. Initial serum immunoreactive parathyroid hormone (PTH) was 446 +/- 111 (normal < 65) pg/ml. Calcium-containing phosphate binders were not used. Calcitriol was ceased if hypercalcemia developed and restarted at 2 micrograms or 1 microgram when calcium returned to normal. Hypercalcemia was frequent (11 episodes in 8 patients on intravenous calcitriol and 10 episodes in 7 patients on oral calcitriol) and dose reduction to 1 microgram was necessary in 7 patients on intravenous and on 6 patients on oral. Serum PTH fell during both treatments. Parathyroid enlargement was seen in 10 glands from 4 patients, but no size reduction was demonstrated with treatment. There was no reduction in activity on quantitative metabolic bone scan. In summary, intermittent oral calcitriol and intermittent intravenous calcitriol were equally effective in reducing serum parathyroid hormone levels and at a dose of 2 micrograms postdialysis caused hypercalcemia with equal frequency. 27 patients on hemodialysis (dialysate aluminium less than 0.7 mumol/l for 2 years, and 2 mumol/l before) whose plasma Ca and PO4 were adequately controlled for already 6 months by high doses of CaCO3 alone (mean +/- SD: 9 +/- 5 g/day), were randomly divided into 2 groups, a control group (c group) which was kept on the same treatment, and a group in which CaCO3 was reduced to 3 g/day but in which plasma Ca was kept normal due to 1 alpha-OH-vitamin D3 administration (1 microgram/day at the beginning, 0.3 microgram/day after 6 months; 1 alpha group) whereas plasma phosphate was kept below 6.0 mg/dl because of Al(OH)3 (2.7-5 g/day). Initially, the 2 groups were comparable as regards the plasma concentrations of total and ionized Ca, phosphate, alkaline phosphatases, medium and C-terminal parathyroid hormone (PTH) and aluminium, but the control group had lower plasma 25-OH-vitamin D (25-OHD.) After 6 months, the same difference in plasma 25-OHD was found with comparable plasma concentrations of total and ionized calcium as well as of medium and C-terminal PTH (beta error 1%). However, plasma concentration of phosphate and the plasma Ca phosphate product, as well as the plasma aluminium were higher in the 1 alpha group whereas their PCO3H- was lower. Although the alkaline phosphatase values were not significantly different between the 2 groups, they increased only in the control group because of 1 patient who developed a vitamin-D-deficient osteomalacia (plasma 25-OHD 3 ng/ml), which was subsequently cured by physiological doses of 25-OHD3. The incidence of transient hypercalcemia (15 vs. 21 episodes) and worsening of soft tissue calcifications (3 in each group) was the same in the 2 groups. An increasing body of experimental data suggests a role for 24,25(OH)2D3 in bone metabolism. The present study was carried out to assess a possible therapeutic role of this vitamin D metabolite in renal osteodystrophy. Twenty-two chronic dialysis patients, most of whom were previously maintained on 1 alpha (OH)D3 therapy, received additional treatment with 10 micrograms/day 24,25(OH)2D3 and were compared to 19 patients receiving 1 alpha (OH)D3 alone. Analysis of transiliac bone biopsies obtained at study entry and following 10-16 months of treatment revealed that the combined therapy produced a decrease in bone turnover. Specifically, the addition of 24,25(OH)2D3 inhibited an increase in trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) and suppressed osteoclastic parameters. Thus BV/TV increased from 26.2 +/- 8.6 to 32.1 +/- 7.5% (p < 0.01) in the 1 alpha (OH)D3 group, but it remained unchanged in the combined therapy group. In contrast, the eroded surface (ES/BS), the osteoclast surface (Oc.S/BS), and the osteoclast numbers were significantly suppressed in patients receiving both 24,25(OH)2D3 and 1 alpha (OH)D3, as compared with those receiving 1 alpha (OH)D3 alone (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively). These improvements were independent of changes in 1 alpha (OH)D3 dosage. The extent of bone aluminium deposits was unrelated to the administration of 24,25(OH)2D3 or to its effect. 24,25(OH)2D3 therapy was not associated with any adverse effects. Because intravenous (iv) calcitriol has greater bioavailability than oral calcitriol, it may be more efficacious in suppressing parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. In this study, the pharmacokinetics and efficacy of pulse oral and i.v. calcitriol were compared. Patients were randomized to receive 2 micrograms of i.v. or oral calcitriol after each dialysis. Two pharmacokinetic studies (PK1, PK2) were performed 10 days apart, during which the patients received calcitriol after each dialysis. Calcitriol bioavailability was determined from the area under the curve (AUCtime interval (hours) in pg/mL per h). After the PK phase, PTH was lowered to < 200 pg/mL by titrating calcitriol to a maximum of 12 micrograms/wk over 4 wk. Calcitriol was then maintained for another 18 wk unless serum calcium exceeded 11.5 mg/dL or Ca x P product exceeded 70; when these limits were reached, calcitriol was held and then restarted at a lower dose. After i.v. administration, peak serum calcitriol exceeded that achieved orally but by 1 h, calcitriol levels were similar. The AUC0-0.5 (105 +/- 12, i.v.; 9 +/- 4, oral) and AUC0.5-1 (68 +/- 6, i.v.; 30 +/- 7, oral) were higher with i.v. (P < 0.05), but cumulative AUC0-48 did not differ. Individual t1/2 values ranged from 10 to 129 h for PK1 and from 10 to 50 h for PK2. The t1/2 for oral calcitriol was 38 +/- 14 h for PK1 and 30 +/- 4 h for PK2 (not significant (NS)). The t1/2 for i.v. calcitriol was 26 +/- 5 h for PK1 and 19 +/- 3 h for PK2 (NS, PK1 versus PK2 and oral versus i.v.). When the PK1 oral and i.v. data were combined, the mean t1/2 was 32 +/- 7 h whereas the t1/2 for PK2 (oral and i.v.) was 22 +/- 3 h (P < 0.05). Baseline PTH levels were 510 +/- 90 pg/mL and 499 +/- 79 pg/mL, oral and i.v., respectively. Serum PTH level at 22 wk was not different between oral and i.v. groups, 153 +/- 38 pg/mL and 214 +/- 124 pg/mL in i.v. (NS). The percentage of PTH suppression was 66 +/- 7.4% in the oral group and 69 +/- 12% in the i.v. group (NS). A major degree of serum iPTH suppression occurred during the initial 4 wk of treatment, concomitant with a rise in serum calcium levels. Adverse effects were similar between groups, as were the average dosages of calcitriol and phosphate binders. In conclusion, the efficacy of intravenous and pulse oral calcitriol were similar in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The early rise in serum calcium levels observed with treatment may have contributed significantly to the suppression of serum iPTH levels. The difference in bio-availability between the different routes does not have a clinically apparent effect. The t1/2 varied widely among individuals, whereas exposure to calcitriol may decrease the t1/2. Paricalcitol (19-nor-1alpha-25-dihydroxyvitamin D2), a new vitamin D analog developed for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism, was evaluated in three double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating, randomized multicenter trials. A total of 78 patients (40 Paricalcitol injection, 38 placebo) achieved treatment phase eligibility, which included intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) > or = 400 pg/ml, normalized serum calcium levels between 8.0 and 10.0 mg/dl, and calcium x phosphorus product values less than 75. Study end points included a decrease in iPTH of at least 30% or a maximum of five dose escalations. After a 4-wk washout, paricalcitol or placebo was administered intravenously three times per week after dialysis for 12 wk. Study drug was started at a dose of 0.04 microg/kg and was increased by 0.04 microg/kg every 2 wk to a maximal allowable dose of 0.24 microg/kg or until at least a 30% decrease in serum iPTH was achieved. The dose of paricalcitol that decreased iPTH by at least 30% became the maintenance dose. Of 40 patients receiving paricalcitol, 27 (68%) had at least a 30% decrease in serum iPTH for 4 consecutive weeks, compared with three of 38 patients (8%) receiving placebo (P < 0.001). For patients who received 12 wk of treatment with paricalcitol, the levels of iPTH decreased significantly from 795+/-86 to 406+/-106 pg/ml (P < 0.001), whereas the values for PTH were 679+/-41 pg/ml before and 592+/-41 pg/ml after 12 wk of therapy in patients receiving placebo (P=NS). Also, there was a significant difference between treatment groups for the change from baseline PTH levels (P < 0.001). Paricalcitol treatment resulted in a significant reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase from 148+/-23 U/L to 101+/-14 U/L (P < 0.001) in patients treated for 12 wk compared with 120+/-9 U/L to 130+/-11 U/L (P=NS) in patients receiving placebo for 12 wk. Importantly, hypercalcemia did not occur before achieving target serum iPTH levels in any of the paricalcitol-treated patients. There was no significant difference for the change from baseline in serum phosphorus within or between treatment groups. There was no significant difference in adverse events between the paricalcitol and placebo-treated groups. These studies demonstrate that paricalcitol safely and effectively suppresses iPTH levels in hemodialysis patients. This second generation vitamin D analog may have a wider therapeutic window than current vitamin D preparations, and thus may allow reduction in PTH with less hypercalcemia. Fifty-seven patients who had been receiving maintenance haemodialysis for a mean of 4.6 years were given 0.25-0.5 microgram oral 1,25-dihydroxy (1,25-(OH)2) vitamin D3 or a placebo in a double-blind manner for one to two years. In patients with normal radiographs (mean plasma parathyroid hormone concentration 205 microliterEq/ml) 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 prevented the development of the radiological appearances of hyperparathyroidism. In patients with abnormal radiographs (mean plasma parathyroid concentration 709 microliterEq/ml) 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 arrested or reversed the radiological changes of hyperparathyroidism. Nevertheless, the response was slow and the concentration of the hormone remained considerably raised (mean 445 microliterEq/ml). It is concluded from these results that giving 1,25-(OH)2 vitamin D3 to patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis who have normal hand radiographs or minimal erosions is beneficial. In patients with more advanced hyperparathyroidism parathyroidectomy should be considered unless there is a rapid response. We report on a 5-year, prospective, double-blind trial of 1,25 dihydroxycholecalciferol (calcitriol) versus placebo in 76 hemodialysis patients without biochemical or radiological evidence of bone disease. Calcitriol, 1 microgram daily, regularly induced hypercalcemia. Doses of 0.25 microgram daily or less proved satisfactory in most patients. During calcitriol treatment, plasma calcium concentration was significantly higher and serum parathyroid hormone concentration significantly lower than on placebo. There was no difference in the rates of development or of progression of vascular calcification in the two groups. Significantly more patients on placebo (17 vs. 6, p less than 0.05) developed a sustained elevation of plasma alkaline phosphatase concentration. Calcitriol appeared to protect against the development of histological evidence of osteitis fibrosa but not of osteomalacia, but accumulation of aluminum in bone occurred during the study. We conclude that calcitriol delays and may prevent the development of osteitis fibrosa in patients receiving regular hemodialysis and may reasonably be prescribed routinely in hemodialysis patients without biochemical or radiological abnormality, unless there is a substantial prospect of early renal transplantation. Calcitriol is widely used in conjunction with phosphorus-binders containing calcium to treat secondary hyperparathyroidism in dialysis patients. Its efficacy in patients with severe hyperparathyroidism is diminished, in part, due to glandular hyperplasia associated with decreased calcitriol and calcium receptors.
                We, therefore, developed a prospective, randomized trial comparing i.v. calcitriol plus calcium carbonate (CaCO3) compared to CaCO3 alone (control) in patients with mild to moderate hyperparathyroidism who were within the first year of initiating hemodialysis. Patients underwent calcium (Ca) suppression/stimulation testing at baseline and after six and twelve months of treatment to indirectly assess parathyroid gland hyperplasia.
                In the calcitriol group, the amino-terminal parathyroid hormone (N-PTH) decreased significantly from a baseline value of 70 +/- 12 pg/ml at month zero to 22 +/- 7 and 19 +/- 6 pg/ml at months 6 and 12, respectively (the conversion factor of amino-terminal PTH to intact PTH is 6, i.e., 10 pg/ml N-PTH equals 60 pg/ml intact PTH). In contrast, the N-PTH levels in the CaCO3 alone group did not change. The change in nadir N-PTH levels at month 12 compared to month zero decreased by 14 +/- 7% in the calcitriol group but increased by 96 +/- 59% in the control group (p < 0.05). In addition, the increment in N-PTH levels during hypocalcemic stimulation decreased by 68 +/- 6% at month 12 compared to month zero but increased by 61 +/- 42% in the control group. Although total calcium and phosphorus levels were not different between the two groups, ionized calcium values were higher in the calcitriol group. The incidence of hypercalcemia was the same in both groups and the episodes were asymptomatic.
                Pulse calcitriol therapy is effective in preventing progression of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients with mild to moderate disease. Based on Ca suppression/stimulation tests, calcitriol was more successful in preventing gland growth than CaCO3 alone. Further studies are needed to determine if the strategy of early treatment of mild to moderate hyperparathyroidism by pulse calcitriol is safe and effective in hemodialysis in patients. This double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated the safety and efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) calcitriol (Calcijex) for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (secondary HPT) in pediatric end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients on hemodialysis (HD). After a 2 to 6-week washout period of all vitamin D compounds, patients with two consecutive PTH values > 400 pg mL(-1), calcium levels < or = 10.5 mg dL(-1) and calcium x phosphorus product values < or = 70 mg2 dL(-2) were eligible for the treatment phase. Patients received a bolus injection of calcitriol or placebo three times a week, immediately after dialysis for up to 12 weeks. Initial doses (0.5-1.5 microg) were based on the severity of secondary HPT. The dose was increased every two weeks by 0.25 microg until there was at least a 30% decrease in PTH from baseline, or Ca > 11.0 mg dL(-1), or Ca x P > 75 mg2 dL(-2). Overall, 11/21 (52%) patients in the calcitriol group had two consecutive > or = 30% decreases from baseline in serum PTH compared with 5/26 (19%) patients in the placebo group (P=0.03). The mean total alkaline phosphatase decreased from 274 to 232 IU L(-1) in the calcitriol group and increased from 547 to 669 IU L(-1) in the placebo group (P=0.002). The mean bone-specific alkaline phosphatase decreased from 72.5 to 68 microg L(-1) in the calcitriol group and increased from 105.3 to 148.5 microg L(-1) in the placebo group (P=0.03). The incidence of two consecutive occurrences of elevated calcium x phosphorus (Ca x P > 75 mg2 dL(-2)) product was higher in the calcitriol group than in the placebo group (P=0.01). Two consecutive occurrences of phosphorus > 6.5 mg dL(-1) occurred in 71% of the calcitriol group and 46% of the placebo group (P=0.14). Calcium levels > 10.5 mg dL(-1) were more common in the calcitriol group than in the placebo group (P=0.01). There was a direct relationship between serum phosphorus concentration and the percentage change in PTH from baseline in both the calcitriol group (r=0.46; P<0.0001) and the placebo group (r=0.21; P=0.0005). This study demonstrates that i.v. calcitriol, at initial doses of 0.5-1.5 microg, effectively reduces PTH levels in pediatric HD patients and that patients should be closely monitored for hyperphosphatemia and elevated Ca x P product. In the present study, we compared the efficacy of two intravenous forms of vitamin D3[Calcijex: 1,25(OH)2D3 and One-Alpha: 1(OH)D3] and that of oral One-Alpha in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Twenty patients were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups (A and B) which were matched for age, sex, and duration of maintenance hemodialysis. None of the patients included had chronic liver disease or had received drugs known to interfere with hepatic enzymes. All patients had received a stable dose of oral calcium and One-Alpha for a minimum period of 1 year, which maintained corrected serum calcium at the upper limit of the normal range. At the start of the study, oral One-Alpha was replaced by Calcijex in group A and injectable One-Alpha in group B. Treatment was maintained for 3 months (phase I). Subsequently, injectable vitamin D3 was discontinued and all patients received their previous dose of oral One-Alpha for a period of 1 month. Finally, oral One-Alpha was discontinued again and the injectable forms of vitamin D3 were crossed over in the 2 treatment groups for another 3 months (phase II). The results showed that the serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3, measured 48 h after intravenous injection of One-Alpha, were not different from that produced by an equivalent dose of Calcijex in the same group of patients. Furthermore, overall analysis of intact parathyroid levels during the cross-over, using ANOVA with repeated responses, indicated that the two analogues were equipotent as regards suppression of PTH secretion. In our study, treatment with intravenous vitamin D3 led to significant suppression of PTH secretion. These results were achieved by a lower drug dosage of vitamin D3 and at lower trough blood levels of 1,25(OH)2D3 as compared to those of oral One-Alpha. Our findings are in favor of the early use of either forms of injectable vitamin D3 in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common complication in children receiving hemodialysis. Active vitamin D is an effective therapy, but its use is often limited by hypercalcemia and increased calcium x phosphorus (Ca x P) product. Paricalcitol, a selective vitamin D receptor activator, causes less sustained hypercalcemia and increase in Ca x P product than calcitriol and has been used effectively in adult hemodialysis patients.
                Double blind, placebo-controlled.
                Hemodialysis units and pediatric subjects receiving hemodialysis.
                After a washout period of 2 to 6 weeks, 29 subjects aged 5 to 19 years received either paricalcitol or placebo for up to 12 weeks (0.04 mug/kg if initial intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH] level < 500 pg/mL [ng/L]; 0.08 mug/kg if initial iPTH level > 500 pg/mL [ng/L]). The dose was increased by 0.04 mug/kg every 2 weeks until there was a 30% decrease in iPTH level from baseline or calcium level greater than 11 mg/dL (>2.74 mmol/L) or Ca x P product greater than 75 mg(2)/dL(2) (>6.04 mmol(2)/L(2)).
                Two consecutive 30% decreases from baseline in iPTH levels and safety of paricalcitol, including hypercalcemia and increase in Ca x P product.
                60% of the paricalcitol group had 2 consecutive 30% decreases from baseline iPTH levels compared with 21% in the placebo group (P = 0.06). The paricalcitol group had a mean decrease in iPTH level of 164 pg/mL (ng/L), whereas the placebo group had a mean increase of 238 pg/mL (ng/L; P = 0.03). There was no difference from baseline to final visit in calcium, phosphorus, or Ca x P product values in either group.
                Low power to detect differences in safety between groups and a short-term study.
                Paricalcitol decreased iPTH levels in children receiving hemodialysis with no significant changes in serum calcium, phosphorus, or Ca x P product values during the course of the study. Twelve patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) requiring dialysis, 7 of whom were hypercalcaemic, were treated with 24,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol [24,25(OH)2D3; 10 micrograms daily for 3 months] or placebo and the treatment then crossed over for a further 3 months. Treatment with 24,25(OH)2D3 was associated with small but significant increments in the fractional rates of absorption of calcium (p less than 0.01) and phosphate (p less than 0.05) measured by a combined radioisotope test, but even during treatment, the absorption of both calcium and phosphate remained subnormal. A significant fall in immunoreactive parathyroid hormone (i-PTH) levels occurred during treatment (p less than 0.05) in the absence of significant changes in plasma ionised calcium and plasma phosphate levels. In 7 patients, treatment with 24,25(OH)2D3 converted parathyroid glands which were non-suppressible by calcium infusion before treatment to suppressible ones (greater than 50% suppression of i-PTH levels) at similar levels of ionised calcium. 24,25(OH)2D3 may have a role in the treatment of renal osteodystrophy, especially in patients with hypercalcaemic hyperparathyroidism. Paricalcitol and doxercalciferol are effective in reducing parathyroid hormone PTH concentrations in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative dose of doxercalciferol (compared to paricalcitol) required to maintain equivalent PTH concentrations in dialysis patients.
                Chronic hemodialysis patients treated with a stable dose of paricalcitol for at least 3 months were randomized to receive doxercalciferol at either 35, 50, or 65% of the paricalcitol dose for 6 weeks. Serum iPTH, calcium, phosphorus, and albumin were determined at baseline and monitored every 2 weeks. A linear regression analysis of percent change in iPTH values by dose group was performed to determine the conversion factor.
                27 patients were enrolled. Initial iPTH, adjusted serum calcium, serum phosphorus, and CaxP were similar among the treatment groups. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a conversion factor of 0.57 for the dose of doxercalciferol relative to paricalcitol resulting in equivalent suppression of iPTH. Corrected serum calcium, phosphorus, CaxP product, as well as incidence of hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia and CaxP >50 were similar for all groups.
                In patients on a maintenance dose of paricalcitol, dosing doxercalciferol at 55-60% of the paricalcitol dose results in comparable inhibition of PTH. To assess the effect of the different modes of calcitriol administration on PTH-ionized calcium relationship we conducted a prospective clinical trial in 33 patients on chronic haemodialysis with secondary hyperparathyroidism (four times upper normal limit intact PTH) who were randomly assigned, with stratification to PTH levels, to receive daily oral, intermittent oral, or intermittent intravenous calcitriol at the same dose of 0.045 micrograms/kg/weekly. PTH-iCa curves were generated by inducing hypo- or hypercalcaemia in sequential haemodialysis 1 week apart, before and after 10 weeks on treatment. All patients were dialysed against a dialysate calcium concentration of 2.5 mEq/l throughout the study period. After drop-outs, 26 patients completed the study: 11 on intravenous calcitriol (mean basal PTH +/- SD: 666 +/- 280 pg/ml), eight on intermittent oral calcitriol (mean basal PTH: 831 +/- 361), and seven on daily oral calcitriol (mean basal PTH: 719 +/- 280). Serum ionized calcium and phosphorus significantly increased in intravenous and daily oral groups after calcitriol treatment, but not in the intermittent oral group. Basal PTH did not significantly change in the three groups after 10 weeks on treatment. Maximal PTH significantly decreased in intravenous group (1449 +/- 660 versus 1122 +/- 691 pg/ml, P = 0.0085) and at the limit of statistical significance in the intermittent oral group (1701 +/- 774 versus 1445 +/- 634, P = 0.12), but it did not change in the daily oral group. Minimal PTH did not modify in the three groups. In all three groups, a shift to the right in the PTH-iCa relationships were observed, with significant changes in the set point of calcium.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) We conducted a 7-month randomized, single, double, single-blind comparison of calcitriol (1,25(OH)2D3) with vitamin D3 in 22 hemodialysis patients to study the effects on the biochemical abnormalities associated with osteodystrophy. Calcitriol was given for 3 mo. All patients had initial prestudy calcium values less than or equal to 9.5 mg/100 ml, and phosphate values less than or equal to 4.5 mg/100 ml. Data were analyzed using the Normalized Trend Index (NTI). Calcitriol induced a rise in calcium (8.7 to 10.25 mg/100 ml) (p less than 0.001) and a fall in alkaline phosphatase (p less than 0.005), while D3 had no appreciable effect. The mean dose of calcitriol during treatment was 0.579 microgram/day while that for D3 was 706 IU/day. The effect on serum phosphate concentration was variable. Hypercalcemia as high as 13.2 mg/100 ml occurred in 2 of 13 patients on 1,25(OH)2D3, but in every instance promptly returned to normal with dose reduction. No other adverse effects were noted with therapy. We conclude that calcitriol reverses the biochemical abnormalities of osteodystrophy. Since its effects are rapidly reversed with discontinuation, the drug is probably safe as well as effective. To examine the most effective route (intravenous vs. "pulse" oral), dose (physiologic vs. pharmacologic) and long-term efficacy of calcitriol therapy for secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), we randomized 19 hemodialysis patients with severe hyperparathyroidism to receive over a 36-week study period either pulse orally administered calcitriol and intravenous placebo (pulse oral group; N = 9) or intravenous calcitriol and oral placebo (intravenous group; N = 10). Calcitriol was given intermittently in a double-blinded fashion at an initial dose of 2 micrograms thrice weekly and increased as tolerated up to a maximum dose of 4 micrograms per treatment. All patients received similar daily calcium supplementation (2.5 g of elemental calcium) and low dialysate calcium (1.25 mmol/liter) throughout the study period. At the maximum tolerated calcitriol dose, serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels were significantly greater 60 minutes following intravenous (389 pmol/liter) compared to oral administration (128 pmol/liter). In spite of the different pharmacologic profiles, intravenous and oral administered calcitriol resulted in similar reductions of serum PTH over the 36 week period of observation (P = 0.300), achieving an overall maximum average PTH reduction of 43% (P = 0.016). Long-term intensive calcitriol therapy (independent of administration route), however, failed to decrease parathyroid gland size as assessed by high resolution ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Calcitriol therapy also failed to alter the calcium sensitivity as assessed by serial PTH measurements in response to calcium loading. Increases in serum calcium, but not calcitriol dose or parathyroid gland size, predicted decrements in serum PTH, whereas hyperphosphatemia and the level of PTH suppression derived from the PTH/ionized calcium response curves predicted refractoriness to calcitriol therapy. Episodes of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were similar in both treatment groups and limited the dose of calcitriol that could be administered. These data indicate that intermittent intensive calcitriol therapy, regardless of administration route, is poorly tolerated, fails to correct parathyroid gland size and functional abnormalities, and has a limited ability to achieve sustained serum PTH reductions in end-stage renal failure patients with severe hyperparathyroidism. Active vitamin D3 is extensively used for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients. But it is often impossible to administer enough dose to suppress parathyroid hormone (PTH) level, because of hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. New modalities with higher specificity for PTH suppression are desirable. We conducted a crossover comparative study of falecalcitriol, an active vitamin D3 analog, and alfacalcidol (1alpha[OH]D3). In this study, 25 hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism who had normal serum calcium levels were enrolled. They received daily oral doses of alfacalcidol during an 8-week observation period. Based on serum calcium levels and intact PTH, the subjects were allocated into two groups, and a comparative study was conducted using unmasked crossover design of two drugs x two periods. The dosage of both drugs was adjusted to maintain the initial serum calcium levels, and the relative change (%change) of serum biochemical parameters were compared. Comparison of two drugs in period 1 was taken as primary efficacy evaluation. Reproducibility of drug action was confirmed by comparing the effect of falecalcitriol between period 1 and 2. The percent change of PTH of falecalcitriol was lower than that of alfacalcidol: Those were, respectively, -7.89% and +30.42% for c-terminal PTH (P = 0.022), -4.39% and +38.88% for i-PTH (P = 0.077), and +3.68% and +30.52% for midregion PTH (P = 0.099). The similar changes were observed in the falecalcitriol group during period 2, confirming the reproducibility. Falecalcitriol was found to be superior to alfacalcidol in suppression of PTH levels in patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism when it is administered in equivalent doses that might maintain similar serum calcium levels. Administration of intravenous (i.v.) calcitriol three times weekly effectively controls the synthesis and secretion of PTH in most uremic patients. Administration of a single dose of 1.25(OH)2D3 reduces synthesis of PTH-mRNA for 6 days in rats. Moreover, it can lower PTH levels for up to 4 days in chronic hemodialysis patients. Therefore, a good response to the administration of i.v. calcitriol two times weekly can be expected. We studied - in a multicenter randomized study in patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism - the effects of the same doses of intravenous calcitriol, administered two or three times weekly.
                Twenty-two hemodialysis patients were randomized into two frequencies of treatment groups: two times (G-2/w) and three times weekly (G-3/w). Both groups were treated with increasing doses of intravenous calcitriol for 3 months (first month 3 microg, second month 4 microg, third month 6 microg weekly).
                After 12 weeks of therapy with intravenous calcitriol the G-2/w group showed a significant reduction in serum PTH levels (from 821 +/- 392 to 350 +/- 246 pg/ml; mean reduction = 57.4%) comparable to the decrease observed in the G-3/w group (from 632 +/- 116 to 246 +/- 190 pg/ml; mean reduction = 61.2%). Ionized calcium (G-2/w from 1.13 +/-0.10 to 1.14 +/- 0.08 and G-3/w 1.21 +/- 0.13 to 1.26 +/- 0.18 mmol/l) and phosphate levels (G-2/w from 4.99 +/- 1.01 to 5.99 +/- 1.78 and G-3/w 5.31 +/- 0.73 to 5.81 +/- 1.18 mg/dl) did not change significantly and phosphate binders were not modified during the study.
                This study confirms that intravenous calcitriol is an effective therapy for moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. The administration of two doses per week of intravenous calcitriol is as efficacious as three doses per week in suppressing PTH secretion. Although the PTH-suppressive effect of intravenous calcitriol has already been demonstrated by various studies, the precise dose-response to calcitriol has not been fully determined for uremic secondary hyperparathyroidism (2HPT). In order to investigate in detail the dose-response of intravenous calcitriol and the adequate initial dose against 2HPT, a randomized prospective double-blind study was conducted.
                One-hundred and sixty-two patients with 2HPT undergoing hemodialysis three times per week were randomly assigned to four calcitriol (Ro21-5535) treatment groups, 0 (placebo), 1, 1.5 or 2 microg. Calcitriol or placebo was given intravenously after each dialysis for 12 weeks under double-blind conditions.
                Calcitriol dose-dependently reduced both intact-PTH and high-sensitivity assay mid-terminal (HS)-PTH levels. The rate of per-week change in intact-PTH was 0.0% in the placebo group, -7.8% in the 1-microg group, -18.9% in the 1.5-microg group and -24.1% in the 2-microg group. Calcitriol dose-dependently increased the rate of increase in serum Ca adjusted by albumin level. The per-week increases in adjusted serum Ca were -0.01, 0.08, 0.23 and 0.35 mg/dl in the placebo, 1-, 1.5- and 2-microg groups, respectively. Although the degree of PTH suppression was correlated with the adjusted serum Ca increase, by-patients investigation revealed that the number of patients with suppression of PTH despite of no or slight elevation of adjusted serum Ca level was largest in the 1-microg group among the three calcitriol groups.
                Intravenous calcitriol was found to have a clear dose-dependent effect on PTH reduction in patients with 2HPT, and the appropriate initial dose of this agent was determined to be 1 microg per dialysis session.
                Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel Comparison of treatments for mild secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients.
                In the management of patients with mild secondary hyperparathyroidism, it is not known whether calcium supplementation alone is sufficient to correct abnormalities in bone and mineral metabolism or if calcitriol is needed in either physiologic oral or intravenous pharmacologic doses.
                This was a 40-week prospective nonmasked trial of 52 patients [parathyroid hormone (PTH) 150 to 600 pg/mL] who were randomized to receive escalating doses of either calcium carbonate (CaCO3) alone (calcium group, N = 11), daily oral calcitriol (oral group, N = 20), or intermittent intravenous calcitriol (IV group, N = 21). The groups were compared with regard to changes in serum intact PTH, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP), incidence of hypercalcemia (>10.5 mg/dL), and hyperphosphatemia (>6.5 mg/dL).
                PTH levels decreased in all groups (P < 0.01, paired t-test). In the calcium group, PTH (mean +/- SEM) decreased from 325 +/- 46.2 to 160 +/- 44.5 pg/mL. In the oral group, it decreased from 265 +/- 26.4 to 125 +/- 23.7 pg/mL, and in the IV group, it decreased from 240 +/- 27.7 to 65 +/- 10.0 pg/mL. Upon analysis of covariance, controlling for the initial PTH level, we found no differences in the PTH response between the groups (P > 0.10). In contrast, the BAP concentration increased from 20.7 +/- 7.6 to 27.5 +/- 7.0 microg/L in the calcium group (P = 0.17), decreased from 20. 6 +/- 3.9 to 17.8 +/- 4.5 microg/L in the oral group (P = 0.26), and from 19.1 +/- 2.6 to 10.6 +/- 1.1 microg/L in the IV group (P = 0. 007). Serum calcium increased significantly in all groups from 8.4 +/- 0.25 to 9.0 +/- 0.28, 8.5 +/- 0.16 to 9.2 +/- 0.27, and 8.7 +/- 0.16 to 9.4 +/- 0.18 mg/dL in the calcium, oral, and IV groups, respectively (P = NS difference between groups). Serum phosphorus was significantly lower in the calcium group throughout the study (P = 0.02). Hypercalcemic episodes were 2.0 +/- 0.8, 3.0 +/- 0.6, and 3. 4 +/- 0.6 per patient-year (P > 0.10), and hyperphosphatemic episodes were 0.9 +/- 0.56, 4.2 +/- 0.79 and 4.9 +/- 0.84 in the calcium, oral, and IV groups, respectively (P < 0.01).
                In mild secondary hyperparathyroidism, all three strategies are effective. High-dose CaCO3 alone may be sufficient to control PTH with a favorable side-effect profile, but calcitriol appears to have additional suppressive effects on bone that are greater following the intravenous route of administration and may increase the risk of adynamic bone disease. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the efficacy, side effects, and costs of 'pulse oral' versus intravenous calcitriol in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis (HD) patients. A total of 20 patients were randomized to receive over a 4-month period pulse orally administered calcitriol (pulse oral group; n = 10) or intravenous calcitriol (intravenous group; n = 10). All patients used standard dialysate calcium (1.75 mmol/l) throughout the study period. In accordance with the study design calcium dialysate concentrations were reduced when this was necessary to avoid hypercalcemic crises. The patients were stratified into two subgroups according to their initial serum PTH levels: patients with mild or moderate degree of hyperparathyroidism (17 patients) and patients with severe hyperparathyroidism (3 patients). Intravenous and pulse oral cacitriol did not significantly reduce serum PTH concentrations in patients with severe hyperparathyroidism (1,157 +/- 156 vs. 807 +/- 228 pg/ml [corrected], p = 0.09). Intermittent calcitriol, administered by intravenous or oral route, significantly reduced serum PTH levels (326 +/- 119 vs. 109 +/- 79 pg/ml [corrected], p = 0.0001) in patients with mild or moderate hyperparathyroidism. In patients with mild or moderate hyperparathyroidism, intravenous calcitriol significantly reduced PTH concentrations at the end of the 1st month, before the increase of serum ionized calcium levels, whereas 'pulse oral' calcitriol significantly suppressed parathyroid activity at the end of the 2nd month. Calcium dialysate concentration was reduced in 9 out of 10 (90%) patients of the pulse oral group and in all patients (10/10) of intravenous group. The incidence of hypercalcemic crises was 24% (39/160) in the pulse oral group and 14% (27/160) in the intravenous group. Analysis of costs showed that intravenous calcitriol was more expensive compared to pulse oral calcitriol. These data indicate that intermittent intensive calcitriol therapy, regardless of the route of administration, is effective in suppressing parathyroid activity in HD patients with mild or moderate hyperparathyroidism. In contrast, intermittent calcitriol therapy has a limited ability to achieve sustained serum PTH reductions in HD patients with severe hyperparathyroidism. Intravenous calcitriol was more expensive than pulse oral calcitriol, and we recommend the use of pulse oral calcitriol in HD patients with mild or moderate secondary hyperparathyroidism. Secondary hyperparathyroidism, a major clinical problem in patients with chronic renal failure, develops in response to phosphate retention and impaired calcitriol [1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3] synthesis. Vitamin D therapy, particularly alfacalcidol [1 alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3], has been shown to be effective in the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a 12-week course of continuous versus intermittent oral alfacalcidol therapy on parathyroid hormone suppression.
                34 patients were selected and randomly divided into 2 groups to receive either intermittent or continuous oral alfacalcidol. Baseline data were obtained on serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase and PTH. All but the PTH were monitored monthly. PTH levels were measured again until the end of the protocol. The intervention was 2 microg of alfacalcidol given after each dialysis session (intermittent group) or 1 microg given 6 days/week (continuous group).
                Serum calcium and phosphorus showed a tendency to increase from baseline levels in both groups. Mean PTH levels for both groups showed a progressive reduction over time during the study period. This decrement showed no significant difference with regard to the schedule of alfacalcidol administration when comparing the 2 groups. There also was no difference in the incidence of side effects--hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia--between the intermittent and continuous intervention.
                Feedback regulation of PTH with oral alfacalcidol therapy is efficient in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism. However, intermittent and continuous oral administration are equally effective in suppressing an elevated PTH level in hemodialysis patients, with similar safety margins. Hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia frequently necessitate vitamin D withdrawal in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. In short-term trials, doxercalciferol (1alpha-hydroxyvitamin D(2) [1alphaD(2)]) suppressed intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) effectively with minimal increases in serum calcium and phosphorus (P) levels. This modified, double-blinded, controlled trial examined the efficacy and safety of 1alphaD(2) use in 138 hemodialysis patients with moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism by using novel dose titration; 99 patients completed the study. Hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism were enrolled onto this study, consisting of washout (8 weeks), open-label 1alphaD(2) treatment (16 weeks), and randomized, double-blinded treatment with 1alphaD(2) or placebo (8 weeks). Oral 1alphaD(2) was administered at each hemodialysis session, with doses titrated to achieve target iPTH levels of 150 to 300 pg/mL. Baseline iPTH levels (897 +/- 52 [SE] pg/mL) decreased by 20% +/- 3.4% by week 1 (P: < 0.001) and by 55% +/- 2.9% at week 16; iPTH levels returned to baseline during placebo treatment but remained suppressed with 1alphaD(2) treatment. In 80% of the patients, iPTH level decreased by 70%, reaching the target level in 83% of the patients. Grouping patients by entry iPTH level (<600, 600 to 1,200, and >1,200 pg/mL) showed rapid iPTH suppression in the group with the lowest level; greater doses and longer treatment were required in the group with the highest level. During open-label treatment, serum calcium and P levels were 9.2 +/- 0.84 (SD) to 9.7 +/- 1.05 mg/dL and 5.4 +/- 1.10 to 5.9 +/- 1.55 mg/dL, respectively. During double-blinded treatment, serum calcium levels were slightly greater with 1alphaD(2) than placebo, but P levels did not differ. During double-blinded treatment, 3.26% and 0.46% of serum calcium measurements exceeded 11.2 mg/dL with 1alphaD(2) and placebo, respectively (P: < 0.01); median level was 11.6 mg/dL during hypercalcemia. Intermittent oral 1alphaD(2) therapy effectively suppresses iPTH in hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism, with acceptable mild hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia. The i.v. bolus administration of 1 alpha hydroxylated vitamin D derivatives is effective in the treatment of uremic hyperparathyroidism. However, few of the published studies of this mode of treatment have been adequately controlled, and recent reports have suggested that p.o. bolus administration may be just as effective. In this study, 16 hemodialysis patients with mild to moderate hyperparathyroidism were assigned, after a 4-wk run-in period, to receive a 6-wk course of either thrice-weekly i.v. or p.o. alfacalcidol (initial dose, 4 micrograms). Then, after a further control period, they received a second 6-wk course, with either p.o. or i.v. alfacalcidol (whichever was not given in the first treatment period). Plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) was measured weekly by the use of an intact hormone assay. Both routes of therapy resulted in a significant suppression of plasma PTH (P = 0.005) and an elevation in plasma ionized calcium (P = 0.01). The magnitude of the responses was similar for the two treatment phases, as was the relationship between the increment in calcium and the decrement in PTH. The most complete suppression of PTH was seen in those with the greatest increment in plasma calcium. The incidence of hypercalcemia and the mean dose reductions necessary were also similar in the two treatment phases. Oral bolus therapy and i.v. bolus therapy with alfacalcidol are equally effective in suppressing hyperparathyroidism. The postulated advantages of i.v. over p.o. therapy with 1 alpha hydroxylated vitamin D derivatives remain to be confirmed by controlled studies. Management of secondary hyperparathyroidism has included the use of active vitamin D or vitamin D analogs for the suppression of parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. Although, these agents are effective, therapy is frequently limited by hypercalcemia, hyperphosphatemia, and/or elevations in the calcium-phosphorus (Ca x P) product. In clinical studies, paricalcitol was shown to be effective at reducing PTH concentrations without causing significant hypercalcemia or hyperphosphatemia as compared to placebo. A comparative study was undertaken in order to determine whether paricalcitol provides a therapeutic advantage to calcitriol.
                A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study comparing the safety and effectiveness of intravenous paricalcitol and calcitriol in suppressing PTH concentrations in hemodialysis patients was performed. A total of 263 randomized patients were enrolled at domestic and international sites. Following the baseline period, patients with serum Ca x P < 75, and a PTH level > or =300 pg/mL were randomly assigned to receive either paricalcitol or calcitriol in a dose-escalating fashion for up to 32 weeks. Dose adjustments were based on laboratory results for PTH, calcium, and Ca x P. The primary end point was the greater than 50% reduction in baseline PTH. Secondary end points were the occurrence of hypercalcemia and elevated Ca x P product.
                Paricalcitol-treated patients achieved a > or =50% reduction from baseline PTH significantly faster than did the calcitriol-treated patients (P = 0.025) and achieved a mean reduction of PTH into a desired therapeutic range (100 to 300 pg/mL) at approximately week 18, whereas the calcitriol-treated patients, as a group, were unable to achieve this range. Moreover, paricalcitol-treated patients had significantly fewer sustained episodes of hypercalcemia and/or increased Ca x P product than calcitriol patients (P = 0.008).
                Paricalcitol treatment reduced PTH concentrations more rapidly with fewer sustained episodes of hypercalcemia and increased Ca x P product than calcitriol therapy. The present study examined the effect of intermittent oral high doses of 1-alpha-OHD3 in combination with a pharmacological dose of 24,25(OH)2D3 on parathyroid hormone (PTH) secretion. Twenty hemodialysis (HD) patients (10 males, aged 26-72 years, on regular hemodialysis for 7-128 months) with secondary hyperparathyroidism resistant to long-term low-dose 1-alpha-OHD3 therapy were studied for 24 weeks. At the outset of the study they were randomly divided into two groups: group 1 received high-dose 1-alpha-OHD3 plus 24,25(OH)2D3 (2 x 5 micrograms/day) and group 2 was on monotherapy with 1-alpha-OHD3. 1-alpha-OHD3 was given three times a week in the evening before each HD in gradually increased doses from 1 to 4 micrograms adjusted to keep serum calcium levels below 2.6 mmol/L. During the therapy mean serum calcium and ionized calcium levels increased but remained in the normal ranges without differences between the two groups. However, the frequency of hypercalcemia episodes was different in the two groups. In the first 12 weeks the number of hypercalcemia episodes was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (6 vs. 12; p < .05), allowing the use of significantly higher 1-alpha-OHD3 doses in group 1. In the second 12 weeks of the study the 1-alpha-OHD3 dose in group 1 had to be reduced due to more frequent appearance of hypercalcemia. So, the 1-alpha-OHD3 doses became similar in the two groups during the second 12 weeks of the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Our prospective 1-year study comprises 93 patients of both sexes, various ages and various dialysis duration. Among them, 31 patients with a concentration of Ca in blood under 2.7 mmol/l, a concentration of P under 1.8 mmol/l and a concentration of PTHi over 65 pg/ml (group 0) received calcitriol 0.25 microgramx418p4The control group consisted of patients not receiving calcitriol and having normal Ca and P metabolism (group 1). The rest of the patients had a concentration of P over 1.8 mmol/l and could not be given calcitriol. A comparison of the dynamics of average plasmic concentrations of Ca, P, AP, PTHi and X-ray changes in group 0 and 1 at the beginning of the investigation and 1 year later was carried out. At the termination of the 1-year treatment, when compared to the initial state, a statistically significant increase in the concentration of Ca (p < 0.005) and in the concentration of P (p < 0.005) was noted in group 0. The average concentration of PTHi decreased to the desired level, the X-ray changes characteristic of secondary hyperparathyroidism progressed more slowly in group 0. Calcitriol has shown a benefit in various small uncontrolled studies of ex vivo immune function. We hypothesized that paricalcitol, a new vitamin D derivative, will have a positive effect on the immune system with minimal adverse effects on calcium homeostasis. Thirty-one hemodialysis patients not administered vitamin D because of low intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels were randomized to placebo or 4 microg of paricalcitol intravenously with the hemodialysis session three times weekly for 12 weeks. Effects on in vivo and ex vivo assessments of immune function were evaluated. All patients achieved the target dose of paricalcitol. Twenty patients were anergic at the start of the study; 4 of 11 patients in the paricalcitol group and 0 of 9 patients in the placebo group converted to reactive (P = 0.09). The in vivo response to standard hepatitis B booster vaccine and in vitro proliferation and release of interleukin-2 (IL-2), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and interferon-gamma from stimulated lymphocytes were not different between the groups. In contrast to clinical immune effects, paricalcitol increased serum calcium levels and decreased PTH and bone alkaline phosphatase levels (all P < 0.05). However, hypercalcemia was infrequent. In vitro experiments showed that paricalcitol led to greater dose-dependent thymidine uptake than calcitriol in lymphocytes isolated from either dialysis patients or control subjects. Paricalcitol has a tendency toward improving delayed hypersensitivity reactions, but did not have other proimmune effects. However, as expected, paricalcitol had significant effects on calcium homeostasis compared with placebo. Thus, patients with low PTH levels are unlikely to experience the proimmune effects of vitamin D therapy without more profound and potentially adverse oversuppression of PTH.
We confirm that vitamin D compounds suppress PTH in people with CKD and requiring dialysis although treatment is associated with clinical elevations in serum phosphorus and calcium. All studies were inadequately powered to assess the effect of vitamin D on clinical outcomes and until such studies are conducted the relative importance of changes in serum PTH, phosphorus and calcium resulting from vitamin D therapy remain unknown. Observational data showing vitamin D compounds may be associated with improved survival in CKD need to be confirmed or refuted in specifically designed RCTs.