A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin chloride in urge urinary incontinence. A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of controlled-release oxybutynin tablets (10 mg once daily) with conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily) in patients whose symptoms were stabilized on 5 mg twice daily of oxybutynin. Solifenacin and tolterodine are equally effective in the treatment of overactive bladder symptoms. Tolterodine: superior tolerability than and comparable efficacy to oxybutynin in individuals 50 years old or older with overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial. Emepronium carrageenate: clinical effects and urinary excretion in treatment of female urge incontinence. Tolterodine: a safe and effective treatment for older patients with overactive bladder. Dose-ranging study of tolterodine in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of solifenacin succinate and extended release tolterodine at treating overactive bladder syndrome: results of the STAR trial. Comparison of darifenacin and oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder: assessment of ambulatory urodynamics and impact on salivary flow. Propiverine compared to oxybutynin in neurogenic detrusor overactivity--results of a randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical study. Tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder. Ocular side-effects of tolterodine and oxybutynin, a single-blind prospective randomized trial. Clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder. Randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial on treatment of frequency, urgency and incontinence related to detrusor hyperactivity: oxybutynin versus propantheline versus placebo. Solifenacin appears effective and well tolerated in patients with symptomatic idiopathic detrusor overactivity in a placebo- and tolterodine-controlled phase 2 dose-finding study. Tolterodine reduces the number of urge incontinence episodes in patients with an overactive bladder. Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine compared to oxybutynin and placebo in patients with overactive bladder. Propiverine versus tolterodine: efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Oxybutynin versus propantheline in patients with multiple sclerosis and detrusor hyperreflexia. [Intravesical instillation of trospium chloride, oxybutynin and verapamil for relaxation of the bladder detrusor muscle. A placebo controlled, randomized clinical test]. Comparison of fesoterodine and tolterodine extended release for the treatment of overactive bladder: a head-to-head placebo-controlled trial. A randomized controlled trial of tolterodine and oxybutynin on tolerability and clinical efficacy for treating Chinese women with an overactive bladder. Propiverine hydrochloride immediate and extended release: comparison of efficacy and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder. Intravesical electromotive administration of oxybutynin in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard anticholinergic regimens. Efficacy and safety of two doses of tolterodine versus placebo in patients with detrusor overactivity and symptoms of frequency, urge incontinence, and urgency: urodynamic evaluation. The International Study Group. Dose titration in clinical trials. An example using emepronium carrageenate in detrusor instability. Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for overactive bladder: results of the OPERA trial. Controlled, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial to investigate long-term tolerability and efficacy of trospium chloride in patients with detrusor instability. Tolterodine once-daily: superior efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of the overactive bladder. A short-term, multicenter, randomized double-blind dose titration study of the efficacy and anticholinergic side effects of transdermal compared to immediate release oral oxybutynin treatment of patients with urge urinary incontinence. Randomized, double-blind, placebo- and propiverine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder. Once daily controlled versus immediate release oxybutynin chloride for urge urinary incontinence. OROS Oxybutynin Study Group. Intravesical oxybutynin: mode of action assessed by passive diffusion and electromotive administration with pharmacokinetics of oxybutynin and N-desethyl oxybutynin. Superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release with rapid onset: a prospective, head-to-head, placebo-controlled trial. Comparison of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. Oxybutinin versus propantheline in the management of detrusor instability. A patient-regulated variable dose trial. Comparison of a 10-mg controlled release oxybutynin tablet with a 5-mg oxybutynin tablet in urge incontinent patients. Intravesical atropine compared to oral oxybutynin for neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a double-blind, randomized crossover trial. Long-term prospective randomized study comparing two different regimens of oxybutynin as a treatment for detrusor overactivity. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome. Trospium chloride and oxybutynin hydrochloride in a german study of adults with urinary urge incontinence: results of a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, flexible-dose noninferiority trial. Randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of the once daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin succinate in patients with overactive bladder. Efficacy and safety of tolterodine in patients with detrusor instability: a dose-ranging study. Darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, is an effective and well-tolerated once-daily treatment for overactive bladder. Efficacy and tolerability of darifenacin, a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), compared with oxybutynin in the treatment of patients with overactive bladder. Comparison of the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in different urodynamic severity grades of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Treatment of overactive bladder with once-daily extended-release tolterodine or oxybutynin: the antimuscarinic clinical effectiveness trial (ACET). A double-blind randomized dose-response study comparing daily doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg controlled-release oxybutynin: balancing efficacy with severity of dry mouth. A placebo-controlled, multicentre study comparing the tolerability and efficacy of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with urgency and urge incontinence. Clinical and urodynamic effects of propiverine in patients suffering from urgency and urge incontinence. A multicentre dose-optimizing study. Trospium chloride versus oxybutynin: a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial in the treatment of detrusor hyper-reflexia. Randomized, double-blind placebo- and tolterodine-controlled trial of the once-daily antimuscarinic agent solifenacin in patients with symptomatic overactive bladder. Clinical efficacy and tolerability of extended-release tolterodine and immediate-release oxybutynin in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Dry mouth with conventional and controlled-release oxybutynin in urinary incontinence. The Ditropan XL Study Group. Randomized trial of oxybutynin extended versus immediate release for women aged 65 and older with overactive bladder: lessons learned from conducting a trial. Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine compared to placebo in detrusor overactivity. Efficacy and safety of solifenacin succinate in Korean patients with overactive bladder: a randomised, prospective, double-blind, multicentre study. Tolterodine: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in Asian patients with symptoms of overactive bladder. Comparative efficacy and safety of transdermal oxybutynin and oral tolterodine versus placebo in previously treated patients with urge and mixed urinary incontinence. A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and propiverine-controlled trial of the novel antimuscarinic agent imidafenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II dose-finding study of the novel anti-muscarinic agent imidafenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder. Minimal clinically important change in urinary incontinence detected by a quality of life assessment tool in overactive bladder syndrome with urge incontinence. Tolerability of 5 mg solifenacin once daily versus 5 mg oxybutynin immediate release 3 times daily: results of the VECTOR trial. Trospium chloride in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity: is dose titration of benefit to the patients?
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new PO controlled-release (CR) QD oxybutynin tablet relative to PO immediate-release (IR) TID oxybutynin in patients with urge urinary incontinence (UI).
                In this multicenter, double-blind trial, patients with UI (> or = 7 episode/wk) and frequency (> or = 8 micturitions/d) were randomized to CR or IR oxybutynin for 6 weeks. Patients initiated treatment at 15 mg/d and the dose was adjusted (in 5-mg/d increments) over 2 weeks according to tolerability. Efficacy (UI episodes, voids, absorbent pads used, urgency, and volume voided per micturition) was assessed during the final 2 weeks of treatment. Tolerability was assessed by evaluating adverse events and treatment withdrawals.
                Of the 125 patients randomized, 94 (75%) were evaluable for efficacy; tolerability was assessed in all patients. In the CR group, 48 patients (91%) were women and 5 (9%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 58.0 (12.4) years (range, 26-78 years). In the IR group, 37 patients (90%) were women and 4 (10%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 60.6 (14.8) years (range, 26-83 years). Both CR and IR oxybutynin significantly reduced the mean number of total UI episodes per week (both P < 0.001 vs baseline). Both treatments produced equivalent reductions in mean voiding frequency and urinary urgency (all P < 0.001 vs. baseline). Significantly more patients rated CR oxybutynin tolerable on the initial dose of 15 mg/d (P = 0.020) and completed the study at a dose of > or = 15 mg/d (P = 0.018). Dry mouth was the most common adverse event, reported by 68% and 72% of patients in the CR and IR oxybutynin groups, respectively.
                Among the patients with urge UI included in this study, CR oxybutynin was as effective as IR oxybutynin for improving primary symptoms, with the additional benefit of QD administration. To compare the efficacy of a controlled-release (CR) formulation of oxybutynin with that of conventional oxybutynin in patients with detrusor instability or detrusor hyper-reflexia whose symptoms were stabilized on conventional oral oxybutynin tablets.
                The study comprised a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial involving 130 patients drawn from 15 centres in the UK. The study was of 6 weeks' duration, i.e. 2 weeks of screening whilst taking conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily) followed by 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with either CR oxybutynin tablets (10 mg once daily) or conventional oxybutynin tablets (5 mg twice daily). Outcome measures were changes in 24-h frequency and 24-h incontinence episodes recorded throughout the study on diary charts. Adverse events were recorded by patients in their diary charts and serum concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite, N-desethyloxybutynin, were measured at baseline and at completion of the study to detect possible drug accumulation.
                The treatments did not differ significantly in any of the outcome measures. The primary efficacy criterion was the daytime continence at completion of the study; 53% and 58% of patients were continent on CR and conventional oxybutynin treatments, respectively (the 95% confidence interval of the difference in the proportion being - 22% to 13%; P = 0.62). The total number of side-effects experienced by those patients receiving treatment with the CR formulation was 57% of that for patients receiving treatment with conventional oxybutynin. Individual side-effects showed a similar distribution within treatment groups. There was no evidence of the accumulation of oxybutynin or N-desethyloxybutynin during the multiple dosing of CR or conventional oxybutynin tablets.
                The CR and conventional formulations of oxybutynin did not differ in their efficacy, and the CR formulation was associated with fewer side-effects. In addition, CR oxybutynin appeared to maintain therapeutic blood levels over the 24 h dosing interval with no accumulation of oxybutynin or its active metabolite. Once-daily dosing with a CR tablet is seen as convenient for the patient and is expected to result in improved compliance in patients already stabilized on conventional oxybutynin treatment. Various antimuscarinic agents have been developed for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB). More data comparing these agents are still required. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of solifenacin and tolterodine in Taiwanese patients with OAB symptoms.
                This was a prospective, randomized, open-label study. A total of 75 patients (25 men and 50 women) with OAB symptoms were randomized to treatment with solifenacin (n = 39) or tolterodine (n = 36). Efficacy and safety variables were assessed and compared with the baseline and between the two groups.
                At week 12, solifenacin and tolterodine demonstrated equal efficacy in reducing the number of micturition (-2.56 ±3.31 vs. -2.44 ± 4.56, p = 0.58), urgency (-1.70 ± 3.07 vs. -1.15 ± 2.68, p =0.37) and incontinence (-2.79 ± 2.82 vs. -4.67 ± 9.29, p =0.28) episodes per 24 hours. There was no difference in improvement of the quality of life. The patient and physician assessments of treatment benefit were not statistically different for solifenacin and tolterodine (p = 0.23 and p = 0.52, respectively), with the majority showing benefits in both groups. The incidence of major adverse events, including dry mouth (18.0%vs. 8.3%, p = 0.31) and constipation (12.8%vs. 2.8%, p = 0.20) was not significantly different. Compared with baseline, the severity of dry mouth did not increase in either group.
                Both solifenacin and tolterodine are effective in treating key OAB symptoms, including urinary frequency, urgency and incontinence in the Taiwanese population. Both medications are comparably effective and safe, with the most common adverse effects being dry mouth and constipation.
                Copyright © 2010 Formosan Medical Association & Elsevier. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. We compared the tolerability and clinical efficacy of tolterodine with those of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder using an upward oxybutynin dose titration strategy analogous to that used in routine clinical practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland.
                In a randomized double-blind trial 378 male and female patients 50 years old or older with symptoms of overactive bladder (a urinary frequency of 8 or more voids per 24 hours with urgency and/or urge incontinence, that is 1 or more urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours) received 10 weeks of treatment with 2 mg. tolterodine twice daily/or an initial dose of 2.5 mg. oxybutynin twice daily, increasing to 5 mg. twice daily after 2 weeks of treatment. The main outcome measures were changes in voiding diary variables combined with detailed tolerability-safety assessments.
                Patients treated with tolterodine had significantly fewer adverse events (69% versus 81%, p = 0.01), notably dry mouth (37% versus 61%, p <0.0001), as well as a lower incidence of dose reduction (6% versus 25%, p <0.0001) than those in the oxybutynin group. Each agent had comparable efficacy for improving urinary symptoms. Tolterodine and oxybutynin caused a significant decrease (p = 0.0001) in the mean number of voids per 24 hours (-1.7 or -15% and -1.7 or -15%, respectively), urge incontinence episodes per 24 hours (-1.3 or -54% and -1.8 or -62%, respectively) and mean voided volume per void (33 ml. or 22% and 34 ml. or 23%) after 10 weeks of treatment.
                Tolterodine is as effective as oxybutynin for improving the symptoms of overactive bladder but it has superior tolerability. The combination of these qualities makes tolterodine the preferred pharmacological therapy for the long-term treatment of this condition. Eighteen women (median age 54 years, 36-79) with urinary motor urge (n = 13) or sensory urge (n = 5) incontinence were treated for three 2-week periods with emepronium carrageenate (EC) (Cetiprin Novum) in daily doses of 500 and 1000 mg and placebo. Subjectively the women experienced an increased ability to control micturition, i.e. less urge, during EC treatment. Only mild and mainly anticholinergic side effects were recorded, most frequently dryness of the mouth. As regards side effects, the evaluation of objective effects were complicated by a tendency towards carry-over effect to placebo. Placebo in the first treatment periods were analysed solely; no effects of placebo could be demonstrated. Compared with the reference period, decreases in the total number of micturitions (approx. 20%) and in the number of urge incontinence episodes (approx. 75%) were seen. As compared with placebo, a significant increase (approx. 25%) in the average micturition volume could be demonstrated. The percentage urinary excretion of emepronium decreased with increasing oral intake and with advancing age. Probably, an initial daily dosage of 500 mg EC will do well in younger women (less than 50 years), whereas elder patients may need 1000 mg. Further dosage recommendations are given. To investigate the clinical safety and efficacy of two dosages of tolterodine in older patients with symptoms attributable to overactive bladder.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, phase III study.
                Incontinence, older care, urological, and urogynecological clinics in the United Kingdom, France, and the Republic of Ireland.
                One hundred and seventy-seven older patients (age > or =65 years) with symptoms of urinary urgency, increased frequency of micturition (> or =8 micturitions/24 hours), and/or urge incontinence (> or =1 episode/24 hours).
                Tolterodine 1 mg or 2 mg twice daily (bid), or placebo, for 4 weeks.
                Safety and tolerability were evaluated through spontaneously reported adverse events, electrocardiogram, and blood pressure measurements. Efficacy was assessed using micturition diary variables: mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition and number of incontinence episodes/24 hours.
                The mean age of the patient population was 75 years. Overall, > or =87% of patients completed the study. Neither dosage of tolterodine was associated with serious drug-related adverse events during the study. No cardiac arrythmogenic events were noted. Dry mouth (mild to moderate intensity) was the most common adverse event in both the placebo and tolterodine treatment groups. Three percent of patients in the tolterodine 2 mg bid group discontinued treatment because of dry mouth, compared with 2% of placebo-treated patients. Compared with placebo, statistically significant decreases in micturition frequency were apparent in both tolterodine treatment groups. Furthermore, patients treated with tolterodine 2 mg bid had statistically significant decreases in urge incontinence episodes/24 hours and increases in volume voided per micturition compared with placebo.
                Tolterodine (taken for 4 weeks) is safe and shows efficacy, particularly at a dosage of 2 mg bid, in the treatment of older patients with urinary symptoms attributable to overactive bladder. Tolterodine is a potent antimuscarinic agent specifically developed for the treatment of urinary urge incontinence and other symptoms related to the overactive bladder. In order to assess the optimum dosage for use in future clinical studies, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was performed in 90 patients with detrusor hyperreflexia and symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, and/or urge incontinence. Urodynamic variables, micturition diary variables, and subjective urinary symptoms were measured before and after 2 weeks' treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 mg twice daily (bd). Serum drug concentrations, electrocardiogram recordings, blood pressure, and incidence of adverse events were also assessed. Linear regression analysis showed a significant dose-response relationship for several clinically relevant urodynamic variables, while there was a trend towards an improvement in micturition diary variables and subjective assessment of symptoms with increasing dosages of tolterodine. There were no safety or tolerability concerns regarding any of the dosages of tolterodine investigated, although 2 patients treated with a dosage of 4 mg bd experienced urinary retention that necessitated dosage reduction. The results of this study suggest that tolterodine is well-tolerated and exerts a dose-dependent effect on bladder function in patients with detrusor hyperreflexia. The optimum dosage of tolterodine for use in future studies is 1-2 mg bd. To compare two new generation antimuscarinics at their recommended doses for treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
                A prospective, double blind, double-dummy, two-arm, parallel-group, 12-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of solifenacin 5 or 10 mg and tolterodine extended release (ER) 4 mg once daily in OAB patients. After 4 weeks of treatment patients had the option to request a dose increase but were dummied throughout as approved product labelling only allowed an increase for those on solifenacin.
                Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, showed greater efficacy to tolterodine in decreasing urgency episodes, incontinence, urge incontinence and pad usage and increasing the volume voided per micturition. More solifenacin treated patients became continent and reported improvements in perception of bladder condition assessments. The majority of side effects were mild to moderate in nature, and discontinuations were comparable and low in both groups.
                Solifenacin, with a flexible dosing regimen, was found to be superior to tolterodine ER with respect to the majority of the efficacy variables. To evaluate the effects of darifenacin, an M3 selective receptor antagonist, compared with oxybutynin, on ambulatory urodynamics, salivary flow, heart rate and visual nearpoint in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
                A double-blind, randomized, crossover study (n=65) with three treatment cohorts: darifenacin immediate release (IR) 2.5 mg three times a day (t.i.d.) or oxybutynin 2.5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin controlled release (CR) 15 mg once daily (q.d.) or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d.; darifenacin CR 30 mg q.d. or oxybutynin 5 mg t.i.d. Within cohorts, patients received 7 days' treatment with each agent separated by 14 days' washout.
                All active treatments improved urodynamic parameters. Both darifenacin CR doses had significantly less effect on salivary flow than oxybutynin. Effects on urodynamic parameters, heart rate and visual nearpoint were comparable.
                Ambulatory urodynamics appears to be an innovative and potentially useful investigative tool in the evaluation of the efficacy of new therapeutic agents. Darifenacin CR is an efficacious therapy for OAB with comparable effects on urodynamic parameters but producing significantly less dry mouth than oxybutynin. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity.
                Patients were eligible, if at least 18 years of age and suffering from neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Eligibility also required a maximum cystometric capacity less than 300 ml. After a one-week run-in period, propiverine 15 mg t.i.d. or oxybutynin 5mg t.i.d. were administered for 21 days. As primary efficacy outcomes urodynamic parameters were assessed. As tolerability outcome the percentage of patients with newly manifesting anticholinergic adverse events was taken.
                131 patients were recruited at 20 study centers. The maximum cystometric capacity (ml) was increased significantly in the propiverine group from 198 (+/-110) to 309 (+/-166), and in the oxybutynin group from 164 (+/-64) to 298 (+/-125). Similarly, maximum detrusor pressure during the filling phase (cm H(2)O) was lowered significantly in the propiverine group from 56.8 (+/-36.2) to 37.8 (+/-31.6), and in the oxybutynin group from 68.6 (+/-34.5) to 43.1 (+/-29.2). No significant differences resulted between treatment groups. Anticholinergic adverse events were reported less frequently in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group (63.0% versus 77.8%). Dryness of the mouth, the most frequent adverse event, was reported significantly less (47.1% versus 67.2%; p=0.02) in the propiverine compared to the oxybutynin group.
                Propiverine and oxybutynin are equally effective in increasing bladder capacity and lowering bladder pressure in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity. The trend for better tolerability of propiverine compared to oxybutynin achieved significance for dryness of the mouth. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine with that of oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder.
                A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multinational phase-III study was conducted in urology and gynaecology clinics in the UK, Republic of Ireland and Sweden. The study enrolled 293 patients with urodynamically confirmed bladder overactivity, increased frequency of micturition (> or = micturitions/24 h) and symptoms of urgency and/or urge incontinence (> or = 1 episode/24 h). Patients received either tolterodine (2 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg three times daily) or placebo. Doses could be reduced, to prevent withdrawal, to 1 mg or 2.5 mg, respectively. The main outcome measures were the mean change from baseline in frequency of micturition/24 h, the number of incontinent episodes/24 h and volume voided per micturition.
                After 12 weeks' treatment, the mean frequency of micturition decreased by 21% and 19.5% in those receiving tolterodine (n = 118) and oxybutynin (n = 118), respectively, and by 10.5% in those on placebo (n = 57). Among those with urge incontinence at baseline (75% of patients), the mean number of incontinent episodes decreased by 47%, 71% and 19%, respectively, in those receiving tolterodine, oxybutynin and placebo. The effect of tolterodine and oxybutynin on these two micturition variables was statistically equivalent. There was also a comparable increase in mean volume voided per micturition in the tolterodine (27%) and oxybutynin groups (31%), compared with 7% in the placebo group. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event and was reported with greater frequency and intensity among patients receiving oxybutynin than among those receiving either tolterodine or placebo. In the oxybutynin group, more patients also withdrew because of adverse events and a greater proportion required dose reduction as a result of adverse events. Despite dose reduction, the frequency of adverse events and the intensity of dry mouth remained higher among those receiving oxybutynin (2.5 mg three times daily) than in patients who remained on tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                Tolterodine 2 mg twice daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of bladder overactivity. Tolterodine was better tolerated than oxybutynin, particularly with respect to the frequency and intensity of dry mouth, but had comparable clinical efficacy. The superior tolerability of tolterodine therefore allows more patients to remain on effective therapy than the current most commonly prescribed agent for the treatment of the overactive bladder. To evaluate the effects of tolterodine and oxybutynin on visual accommodation, pupillary diameter, intraocular pressure and tear secretion in women with overactive bladder.
                One hundred and four eyes from 52 consecutive female patients (age range: 22-60 years) with a urodynamic diagnosis of overactive bladder were prospectively investigated. Patients with a history of ocular disease or surgery were excluded. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups: Group I received 2 mg tolterodine bid and Group II received 5 mg oxybutynin tid. All patients were evaluated at baseline (day 0) and after 1 month of treatment (day 28) by an ophthalmologist who was blinded to the medication. At each time point, a complete ophthalmic examination was performed and accommodation amplitude (AA), and pupillary diameter (PD) in dim and bright light were recorded. As well, tear secretion was assessed based on tear film break-up time and Schirmer I-test results. Statistical comparisons were made using the chi-square test, Student's t-test and Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate.
                Twenty-eight patients (56 eyes) received tolterodine and 24 patients (48 eyes) received oxybutynin. The mean ages of the two groups were similar (P = 0.523). After 4 weeks of treatment, AA was significantly lower in the oxybutynin treated group (P = 0.003, 95% CI 0.15, 0.62) whereas there was no significant change in AA in the tolterodine treated group (P = 0.155, 95% CI -0.042, 0.86). At day 28, PD in dim light was significantly larger in the tolterodine treated group (P = 0.031, 95% CI -0.82, -0.06), whereas no significant change in PD in dim light was noted in the oxybutynin treated group (P = 0.330, 95% CI -0.38, 0.18). Neither group showed a significant change in PD in bright light values on day 28 (P > 0.05 for both). In each group, the differences from day 0 to day 28 for intraocular pressure, and Schirmer-I results were insignificant (P > 0.05 for all). Both groups had significantly shorter tear film break-up time after 1 month of therapy (P = 0.014 (95% CI 0.47, 3.81) and P = 0.02 (95% CI 1.14, 4.61) for the tolterodine and oxybutynin treated groups, respectively).
                Four weeks of standard-dose oxybutynin treatment in women with overactive bladder decreases AA significantly, whereas the same duration of standard-dose tolterodine does not have this effect. However, tolterodine seemed to affect PD in dim light. One month of treatment with either of these anticholinergic drugs shortens tear film break-up time significantly. Concerning ocular side-effects, tolterodine seems to offer an advantage over oxybutynin because it does not affect AA, however, the shorter tear film break-up time with both agents suggests potential problems for patients who already have dry eye. To determine the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of fesoterodine in subjects with overactive bladder (OAB).
                This was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial with tolterodine extended release (ER) to assess the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine. Eligible subjects (> or =18 yr) with increased micturition frequency and urgency and/or urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) were randomised to placebo, fesoterodine 4 mg, fesoterodine 8 mg, or tolterodine ER 4 mg for 12 wk. The primary efficacy variable was a change from baseline to week 12 in micturitions per 24 h. Co-primary end points included change from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes per 24 h and Treatment Response ("yes" or "no," based on four-point treatment benefit scale). Secondary efficacy variables included mean volume voided per micturition, continent days per week, and number of urgency episodes.
                At the end of treatment, subjects taking fesoterodine 4 and 8 mg had significant (p<0.05) and clinically relevant improvements versus placebo in the primary, co-primary, and most secondary efficacy variables. Tolterodine ER (active control) also provided significantly greater improvement than placebo for most efficacy variables, confirming the sensitivity of the study design. A more pronounced effect was observed with fesoterodine 8 mg at most end points.
                Both doses of fesoterodine were significantly better than placebo in improving the symptoms of OAB and produced a significantly greater Treatment Response versus placebo. Efficacy was more pronounced with fesoterodine 8 mg compared with the other treatments. Active treatments were well tolerated. Clinical efficacy and adverse effects of oxybutynin and propantheline in the treatment of symptoms related to detrusor hyperactivity were studied in a randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter trial. Of 169 patients entered into the study 154 were evaluable for statistical analysis. Mean grade of improvement (visual analogue scale) was significantly higher with oxybutynin (58.2%) versus propantheline (44.7%) and placebo (43.4%). Mean bladder volume at first involuntary cystometric contraction was significantly increased with oxybutynin (+57.0 ml.) versus placebo (-9.7 ml.). Mean maximum cystometric bladder capacity was also significantly increased with oxybutynin (+80.1 ml.) versus placebo (+22.5 ml.). Rate of inquired possible adverse effects was significantly higher for oxybutynin (63%) versus propantheline (44%) and placebo (33%). However, only 5 patients dropped out of the study because of adverse effects (oxybutynin 2 and propantheline 3). No serious or lasting adverse effects were encountered with dryness of the mouth being the major complaint. Oxybutynin has statistically significant effects on subjective symptoms and objective urodynamic parameters in patients with detrusor hyperactivity compared to propantheline. To evaluate the dose-response relationship and safety/tolerability of solifenacin succinate (YM905) in the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB), and to compare its efficacy and safety/tolerability with tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                This multicentre study included a 2-week single-blind placebo run-in, a 4-week double-blind placebo-controlled active treatment phase, and a 2-week follow-up. Men and women with an OAB and urodynamic evidence of detrusor overactivity were randomized to placebo or solifenacin 2.5, 5, 10 or 20 mg once daily, or tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                Of 265 patients enrolled, 225 were randomized and 192 completed the study. Solifenacin 5, 10 and 20 mg produced statistically significant (P < 0.05) improvements in voids/24 h vs placebo, whereas tolterodine did not; the mean change with tolterodine was between those with solifenacin 2.5 and 5 mg. The outcome was similar for the mean change from baseline to endpoint in mean volume voided/void. For incontinence and urgency episodes/24 h the solifenacin dose groups showed numerically superior changes vs placebo; the mean effects with tolterodine were generally smaller than with solifenacin. Most of the efficacy effect of solifenacin was evident at 2 weeks. Quality-of-life outcomes supported the efficacy results. Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg were well tolerated; there were no serious treatment-related adverse events. The incidence of dry mouth was 14% for solifenacin 5 and 10 mg, 2.6% for placebo and 24% for tolterodine.
                In this study, the 5- and 10-mg doses of solifenacin appeared to be the most clinically effective for treating OAB, considering the balance between efficacy, quality of life and tolerability. From the results of this study solifenacin 5 and 10 mg were selected for further evaluation in large-scale phase 3 studies. To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of tolterodine compared to placebo in patients with an overactive bladder.
                A double-blind, multi-centre phase III study in France and Belgium 251 patients with overactive bladder symptoms, and urodynamically verified detrusor overactivity, were randomised to receive 4-week treatment with either placebo or tolterodine 1 or 2mg twice daily (bd). Efficacy was evaluated from patient micturition diaries. Safety and tolerability endpoints were also evaluated.
                After 4-week treatment, the number of incontinence episodes/24h decreased significantly relative to placebo in the tolterodine 1 and 2 mgbd groups (P=0.045 and P=0.0089, respectively). Both dosages of tolterodine increased volume voided per micturition compared with placebo (P=0.055 and P=0.056, respectively), although significant decreases in micturition frequency were not apparent. Tolterodine was safe and well tolerated, few patients were withdrawn due to adverse events. Dry mouth, mainly of mild-to-moderate intensity, was the most common adverse event. No clinically relevant changes in blood pressure or laboratory safety variables were reported.
                Tolterodine is effective, safe and well tolerated for the treatment of symptoms of an overactive bladder, particularly urge incontinence. This study compared the clinical efficacy (determined from micturition diaries) and safety of 12 weeks' treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily or placebo in patients with an overactive bladder. A total of 277 patients were randomized and treated at 25 centers. Both tolterodine and oxybutynin significantly increased volume voided/micturition compared to placebo. Both treatment groups evoked greater decreases in micturitions per 24 hours and incontinence episodes per 24 hours compared to placebo; however, only tolterodine was significantly better than placebo in reducing micturition frequency. Tolterodine and oxybutynin were equivalent in their effectiveness. Tolterodine was significantly better tolerated than oxybutynin when adverse events (particularly frequency and intensity of dry mouth), dose reduction and patient withdrawals were considered. Oxybutynin is an effective drug whose frequent adverse effects limit its clinical usefulness. Tolterodine has equivalent efficacy to oxybutynin, but with less severe adverse effects. This will allow patients to receive more effective treatment for their condition, with better compliance. Propiverine and tolterodine were compared with respect to efficacy, tolerability and impact on the quality of life in the treatment of patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity.
                In a randomised, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial, patients with idiopathic detrusor overactivity were treated with 15 mg propiverine twice daily or 2mg tolterodine twice daily over a period of 28 days. The maximum cystometric capacity was determined at baseline and after 4 weeks of therapy. The difference of both values was used as the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were voided volume per micturition, evaluation of efficacy (by the investigator), tolerability, post void residual urine, and quality of life.
                The mean maximum cystometric capacity increased significantly (p < 0.01) in both groups. The volume at first urge and the frequency/volume chart parameters also showed relevant improvements during treatment. 42/100 patients in the propiverine group and 43/102 in the tolterodine group experienced adverse events. The most common adverse event, dry mouth, occurred in 20 patients in the propiverine group and in 19 patients in the tolterodine group. The scores for the quality of life improved comparably in both groups.
                The study demonstrates comparable efficacy, tolerability, and improvement in the quality of life of 15 mg propiverine twice-daily and 2mg tolterodine twice-daily in the treatment of the symptoms of idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Hyperreflexia is the most common urological finding in patients with multiple sclerosis. A prospective randomized study was done to compare the effectiveness of 2 commonly used drugs, oxybutynin and propantheline. Of the 34 patients entered into the trial 19 were treated with oxybutynin and 15 with propantheline. The urological symptoms (frequency, nocturia, hesitancy, urgency and urge incontinence) were graded according to severity from 0 to 3. Patients with urinary infection were excluded. Urodynamic examination, consisting of cystometrography and electromyography, was performed in all patients before treatment. Both groups of patients had comparable neurological, urological and urodynamic status before treatment. In 4 patients (21 per cent) treated with oxybutynin and in 4 (27 per cent) treated with propantheline side effects were so severe that the treatment had to be discontinued. Symptomatic response to oxybutynin was good in 10 patients (67 per cent), fair in 2 (13 per cent) and poor in 3 (20 per cent). Propantheline produced good symptomatic results in 4 patients (36 per cent), fair in 1 (9 per cent) and poor in 6 (55 per cent). The mean increase in maximum cystometric capacity on cystometrography was significantly larger in the oxybutynin group than in the propantheline group (144 +/- 115 versus 35 +/- 101). Our results indicate that oxybutynin is more effective than propantheline in the treatment of detrusor hyperreflexia in patients with multiple sclerosis. Therapy of detrusor hyperactivity with anticholinergic agents often is followed by adverse drug reactions. Intravesical application may be an interesting alternative. A randomised, single-blind, placebo-controlled, mono-centre clinical trial was carried out in 84 patients with urgency or urge incontinence. Due to intravesical administration of oxybutynin (CAS 5633-20-5) (n = 21) and trospium chloride (CAS 10405-02-4) (n = 21), respectively, a significant increase in maximum bladder capacity and decrease of detrusor pressure accompanied by an increase of residual urine were found in comparison to placebo in urodynamical investigations. Improvement of uninhibited bladder contractions occurred leading to higher filling volume. Under verapamil (CAS 152-11-4) (n = 21) no marked changes in the efficacy variables were found compared with placebo. All patients completed the study and were assessed with regard to efficacy and safety. No adverse events or marked changes in the vital signs were reported. The immediate onset of effect and the lack of adverse drug reactions suggest that treatment with topical oxybutynin or trospium chloride is an effective alternative in patients with intolerable side effects when orally treated. In addition, intravesical administration may be indicated in patients with bladder spasms due to indwelling catheter or in order to increase bladder capacity before percutaneous cystostomy. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of fesoterodine 8 mg with tolterodine extended-release (ER) 4 mg and placebo in a randomized clinical trial of patients with an overactive bladder (OAB).
                In this 12-week double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, eligible patients reported OAB symptoms for > or = 3 months and recorded > or = 8 voids and > or = 1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode per 24 h in 3-day bladder diaries at baseline. Patients were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week then 8 mg for 11 weeks); tolterodine ER 4 mg; or placebo (with sham dose escalation for tolterodine ER and placebo). Endpoints were changes from baseline to week 12 in UUI episodes (primary endpoint), total and nocturnal voids, urgency episodes, severe urgency episodes, and frequency-urgency sum per 24 h; mean voided volume per void (MVV); and the OAB questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS). Safety and tolerability were assessed and summarized over the 12-week study period.
                Fesoterodine (636 patients) significantly improved UUI episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) compared with tolterodine ER (641 patients; P = 0.017) and placebo (313 patients; P < 0.001). Fesoterodine also produced significantly greater improvements than tolterodine ER in MVV (P = 0.005). Fesoterodine significantly improved all diary endpoints compared with placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.327). Tolterodine ER significantly improved all diary endpoints vs placebo (P < 0.001), except for nocturnal voids (P = 0.506) and MVV (P = 0.103). Diary dry rates (the proportion of patients reporting no UUI episodes at endpoint among those with one or more UUI episodes at baseline) were significantly higher with fesoterodine (64%) than with tolterodine ER (57%; P = 0.015) and placebo (45%; P < 0.001). Improvements in PPBC, UPS and OAB-q scale and domain scores at week 12 were all significantly better with fesoterodine than placebo (all P < 0.001) and tolterodine ER (all P < 0.05) except for the OAB-q Sleep domain vs tolterodine ER (P = 0.081). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 5% in the fesoterodine group, 16% and 4% in the tolterodine ER group, and 6% and 3% with placebo, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-emergent adverse events were 6%, 4% and 2% in the fesoterodine, tolterodine ER, and placebo groups, respectively.
                In patients with OAB, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superior efficacy over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo in reducing UUI episodes (primary endpoint) and in improving most patient-reported outcome measures. Both active treatments were well tolerated. Objective To compare the tolerability and clinical efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in the treatment of Hong Kong Chinese women with an overactive bladder. Patients and methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at two urogynaecology centres in Hong Kong. In all, 106 women with urodynamically confirmed detrusor instability were recruited. Baseline severity assessments included a visual analogue scale (VAS), urinary diary and urinary pad-test. The women were randomized to receive either oral tolterodine 2 mg or oxybutynin 5 mg twice daily for 10 weeks. Treatment responses were assessed at 4 and 10 weeks using the VAS and urinary diary. Treatment tolerability was assessed at baseline, 4 and 10 weeks using the Xerostomia Questionnaire. A urinary pad-test was repeated at 10 weeks. Results The perceived change from baseline VAS was better in the tolterodine than the oxybutynin group after 10 weeks of treatment (per-protocol analysis, P = 0.043). The two drugs were effective in reducing the symptoms of frequency (P < 0.001). Tolterodine was significantly better than oxybutynin in reducing urinary leakage (urinary pad-test; median change - 5.00 g vs 0 g, P = 0.019). Both drugs caused a significant worsening of dry mouth (overall dryness, P < 0.005; discomfort, P < 0.005; sleep, P = 0.021; speaking, P = 0.045; swallowing, P = 0.004; and liquid consumption, P = 0.017). Conclusions Both oxybutynin and tolterodine were effective in ameliorating the severity of the symptoms of detrusor instability. Tolterodine was better than oxybutynin in both subjective and objective outcome measures, but both drugs caused similar worsening of dry mouth that may limit the tolerability of these medications. This study aims to compare the efficacy of propiverine hydrochloride immediate release (IR), propiverine hydrochloride extended release (ER) and placebo for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome. The primary outcome measure is incontinence episode frequency, with secondary outcome measures including mean volume per void and quality of life as assessed on King's Health Questionnaire.
                The double-blind, double-dummy, randomized study compared IR 15 mg twice daily, ER 30 mg once daily and placebo in 3 parallel groups. After a run-in period of 7 days, the patients were treated for 32 days. Nine hundred and eighty-eight patients were randomized, and 910 patients completed the protocol without major violations.
                The number of incontinence episodes/24 h decreased by 2.26 in the IR group (p < 0.001 vs. placebo), by 2.46 in the ER group (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo) and by 1.75 in the placebo group. The most frequent adverse event was dry mouth with 22.8% of the patients in the IR group, 21.7% in the ER group and 6.4% in the placebo group. The overall tolerability was rated 'very good' or 'good' by more than 80% of the investigators and patients in all 3 groups.
                Propiverine ER 30 mg once daily and propiverine IR 15 mg twice daily significantly reduce the number of incontinence episodes/24 h within a treatment period of 32 days. Both formulations are safe and well tolerated. The extended release formulation of propiverine is a suitable new option for the treatment of the overactive bladder.
                Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel. About 15% to 20% of patients with detrusor hyperreflexia do not benefit from oral oxybutynin regimens, frequently because of unpleasant side effects. Several reports indicate that intravesical oxybutynin is effective in many of these patients but there are some who still fail to respond.
                A select group of 10 adults with detrusor hyperreflexia unresponsive to standard oral and intravesical oxybutynin regimens were treated at weekly intervals with 5 mg. oxybutynin orally, or 5 mg. oxybutynin in 100 ml. intravesically for 60 minutes of passive diffusion and for 30 minutes with 5 mA. electrical current. Each treatment (plus oral placebo and 2 intravesical controls) was associated with an 8-hour, full urodynamic monitoring session, and periodic blood and bladder content sampling.
                There was no significant objective improvement with oral or intravesical passive diffusion oxybutynin. Conversely there was significant improvement in 5 of 6 objective urodynamic measurements with intravesical electromotive oxybutynin. Plasma profiles were a single peak and decay following oral oxybutynin and 2 distinct peaks with intravesical passive diffusion and electromotive oxybutynin. Area under the curve for intravesical passive diffusion were 709 ng. per 8 hours versus oral 1,485 (p <0.05) versus intravesical electromotive 2,781 (p <0.001). Bladder content samples confirmed oxybutynin absorption. Oral oxybutynin caused anticholinergic side effects in 7 of 10 patients. There were no side effects with intravesical passive diffusion or electromotive administrations.
                Accelerated intravesical administration results in greater bioavailability and increased objective benefits without side effects in previously unresponsive patients compared with oral and intravesical passive diffusion oxybutynin administration. Tolterodine is a new competitive muscarinic receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of the unstable bladder. A total of 242 patients were enrolled in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over a period of 4 weeks in patients with detrusor overactivity and symptoms of frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence. The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of tolterodine given at 1 or 2 mg b.i.d. versus placebo. At week 4 a statistically significant increase in the volume at first contraction (p = 0.030) and maximal cystometric capacity (p = 0.034) was only in the tolterodine 2 mg b.i.d. group. Tolterodine was safe and generally well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth, as the most commonly reported adverse event, was only 9% and of mild to moderate intensity. Seventy-two women with proven detrusor instability completed a novel clinical trial of the new anticholinergic emepronium carrageenate (Cetiprin novum), which allowed for dose titration. The tolerated dose has been shown to correlate with the severity of symptoms. Statistically significant improvement was achieved in symptomatic and urodynamic parameters without serious side effects. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release formulations of oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate in women with overactive bladder.
                The OPERA (Overactive bladder: Performance of Extended Release Agents) trial was a randomized, double-blind, active-control study performed at 71 US study centers from November 21, 2000, to October 18,2001. Extended-release formulations of oxybutynin at 10 mg/d or tolterodine at 4 mg/d were given for 12 weeks to women with 21 to 60 urge urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per week and an average of 10 or more voids per 24 hours. Episodes of UUI (primary end point), total (urge and nonurge) incontinence, and micturition were recorded in 24-hour urinary diaries at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 and compared. Adverse events were also evaluated.
                Improvements in weekly UUI episodes were similar for the 790 women who received extended-release formulations of oxybutynin (n = 391) or tolterodine (n = 399). Oxybutynin was significantly more effective than tolterodine in reducing micturition frequency (P = .003), and 23.0% of women taking oxybutynin reported no episodes of urinary incontinence compared with 16.8% of women taking tolterodine (P = .03). Dry mouth, usually mild, was more common with oxybutynin (P = .02). Adverse events were generally mild and occurred at low rates, with both groups having similar discontinuation of treatment due to adverse events.
                Reductions in weekly UUI and total incontinence episodes were similar with extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine. In the oxybutynin group, micturition frequency was significantly lower, and the percentage of women reporting no urinary incontinence episodes was significantly higher compared with the tolterodine group. Dry mouth was more common with oxybutynin, but tolerability was otherwise comparable, including adverse events involving the central nervous system. Our objectives were to ascertain the tolerability and efficacy of trospium chloride in doses of 20 mg twice daily for long-term therapy (52 weeks) in patients with urge syndrome. The trial comprised a total of 358 patients with urge syndrome or urge incontinence. After randomisation in the ratio of 3:1, participants were treated continuously for 52 weeks with either trospium chloride (20 mg twice daily) or oxybutynin (5 mg twice daily). At intervals of 4-8 weeks, patients were physically examined with measurements of blood pressure and pulse rate, were questioned about any adverse events, checked for compliance and underwent relevant laboratory tests. As an additional safety measure, an ECG was made at 26 and 52 weeks. Urodynamic measurements were performed at the beginning, and at 26 and 52 weeks to determine the maximal cystometric bladder capacity. Among others things, the frequencies of micturition, incontinence and number of urgency events were recorded in patient diary protocols in weeks 0, 2, 26 and 52. The evaluation of vital parameters, laboratory results and ECGs did not show any relevant changes attributable to the action of the anticholinergics. Analysis of the micturition diary clearly indicated a reduction of the micturition frequency, incontinence frequency, and a reduction of the number of urgencies in both treatment groups. Mean maximum cystometric bladder capacity increased during treatment with trospium chloride by 92 ml after 26 weeks and 115 ml after 52 weeks (P=0.001). Further comparison with oxybutynin did not reveal any statistically significant differences in urodynamic variables between the drugs. Adverse events occurred in 64.8% of the patients treated with trospium chloride and 76.7% of those treated with oxybutynin. The main symptom encountered in both treatment group was dryness of the mouth. For patients on trospium chloride, the estimated risk of an unexpected adverse event was 0.027 per patient per week for all adverse events and 0.009 for dryness of the mouth, resulting in a considerably lower risk during treatment given with trospium chloride than with oxybutynin (0.045 and 0.021, respectively). An overall assessment for each of the drugs reveals a comparable efficacy level and a better benefit-risk ratio for trospium chloride than for oxybutynin due to better tolerability. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new extended-release (ER), once-daily, capsule formulation of tolterodine, relative to placebo and the existing immediate-release (IR), twice-daily, tablet formulation, for treatment of the overactive bladder.
                This was a double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. One thousand five hundred twenty-nine patients (81% women) with urinary frequency (eight or more micturitions every 24 hours) and urge incontinence (five or more episodes per week) were randomized to oral therapy with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (n = 507), tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (n = 514), or placebo (n = 508) for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the treatment period on the basis of the micturition diary variables. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating the adverse events, electrocardiogram parameters, laboratory values, and treatment withdrawals.
                Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily (P = 0.0001) and tolterodine IR 2 mg twice daily (P = 0.0005) both significantly reduced the mean number of urge incontinence episodes per week compared with placebo. The median reduction in these episodes as a percentage of the baseline values was 71% for tolterodine ER, 60% for tolterodine IR, and 33% for placebo. The ER formulation was 18% more effective than the IR formulation (P <0.05). Treatment with both formulations of tolterodine was also associated with statistically significant improvements in all other micturition diary variables compared with placebo. For both formulations, the mean decreases in micturition frequency (P <0.0079) and pad usage (P <0.0145) were significant, and the mean volume voided per micturition increased (P = 0.0001). The rate of dry mouth (of any severity) was 23% for tolterodine ER, 30% for tolterodine IR, and 8% for placebo. The overall dry mouth rate for patients taking tolterodine ER was 23% lower than for tolterodine IR (P <0.02), and the rate of severe dry mouth in the ER group was only 1.8%. The rates of withdrawal were comparable for the two active groups and the placebo group. No safety concerns were noted.
                Tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of overactive bladder with no safety concerns. Tolterodine ER demonstrated an improved efficacy for reducing urge incontinence episodes and a lower frequency of dry mouth compared with the existing IR twice-daily formulation. We compared the short-term efficacy, safety and tolerability of transdermal versus oral oxybutynin in adults with urge urinary incontinence.
                Volunteers with detrusor instability currently responding to oral immediate release oxybutynin were enrolled in our study. Those patients presenting with recurrence of incontinent symptoms after a 2-week washout underwent confirmatory cystometrogram with subsequent randomization to transdermal or oral treatment. Matching active and placebo medications included matrix patches applied twice weekly and capsules taken 2 or 3 times daily. Dose titration was based on anticholinergic symptoms. Outcome measures included comparison of baseline to 6 week changes in incontinence episodes on a 3 day urinary diary, a visual analog scale for efficacy and anticholinergic symptoms reported on a questionnaire. Safety monitoring included adverse events and skin tolerability of the transdermal system.
                A total of 76 patients were enrolled and 74 completed at least 4 weeks of treatment. Mean age in the transdermal and oral groups was 64 and 63 years, and 87% and 97% were female, respectively. Daily incontinent episodes decreased in the transdermal and oral groups (7.3 to 2.4 [66%] and 7.4 to 2.6 [72%], respectively, p = 0.39). The visual analog scale reduction in urinary leakage improved from washout in both groups (p <0.0001) with no difference between them (p = 0.9). Dry mouth occurred in significantly fewer patients in the transdermal (38%) compared with those in the oral group (94%, p <0.001). Of the patients in the transdermal group 67% noticed a reduction in dry mouth severity compared with previous oral treatment, and 90% had none or mild skin erythema.
                Transdermal delivery of oxybutynin resulted in comparable efficacy and a significantly improved anticholinergic side effect profile compared with oral administration in adults with urge urinary incontinence. To compare solifenacin succinate (5 and 10 mg once-daily) to placebo and propiverine hydrochloride (20 mg once-daily), respectively, in Japanese patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB).
                A multicentre, 12-week, double-blind phase III trial randomized men and women aged > or = 20 years with OAB to solifenacin 5 or 10 mg, propiverine 20 mg, or placebo. Changes at endpoint in number of voids/24 h, urgency, incontinence, urgency incontinence and nocturia episodes, volume voided/void, restoration of continence and quality of life (QoL) were examined.
                Of 1593 patients randomized, 1584 were treated; at the endpoint there were greater reductions in mean (sd) voids/24 h with solifenacin 5 mg, at -1.93 (1.97), and 10 mg, at -2.19 (2.09), and propiverine 20 mg, at -1.87 (2.70), than with placebo, at -0.94 (2.29) (P < 0.001 for all). Solifenacin (5 and 10 mg) was superior to placebo, and no worse than propiverine 20 mg, for this variable. There were significantly fewer mean (sd) urgency, incontinence and urgency incontinence episodes with solifenacin and propiverine than with placebo, with respective changes on placebo of - 1.28 (2.90), - 0.72 (1.95) and - 0.69 (2.00); solifenacin 5 mg, - 2.41 (2.88), -1.59 (2.12) and -1.45 (1.89) (P < 0.001 for all), and 10 mg, -2.78 (2.82), - 1.60 (1.81) and - 1.52 (1.77) (P < 0.001 for all), and propiverine 20 mg, -2.30 (3.08), -1.25 (2.79) and - 1.19 (2.20) (P < 0.001, = 0.002 and = 0.002 respectively). All active treatments vs placebo improved the volume voided (P < 0.001 for all) and QoL; solifenacin 10 mg reduced nocturia episodes (P = 0.021) and significantly improved urgency episodes (P = 0.012) and volume voided (P = 0.009) vs propiverine 20 mg, and solifenacin 5 mg caused less dry mouth (P = 0.003). Solifenacin 10 mg caused more dry mouth (P = 0.012) and occurrences of constipation (P = 0.004) than propiverine 20 mg, but discontinuation rates between both treatment groups were similar. Continence was restored at endpoint in more than half of the patients on active treatment.
                Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily significantly improved the symptoms of OAB compared with placebo. Solifenacin therapy at 5 mg once daily is well-tolerated; 10 mg can be given if additional efficacy is required. We compared the efficacy and safety of once daily controlled and immediate release oxybutynin for incontinence.
                This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active control, parallel study was designed to evaluate urge urinary incontinence episodes using a 7-day diary.
                A total of 97 women and 8 men 34 to 76 years old with urge incontinence or mixed incontinence with a clinically significant urge component were enrolled in the study. The number of weekly urge incontinence episodes decreased from 27.4 to 4.8 after controlled and from 23.4 to 3.1 after immediate release oxybutynin (p = 0.56), and total incontinence episodes decreased from 29.3 to 6 and from 26.3 to 3.8, respectively (p = 0.6). Weekly urge incontinence episodes from baseline to end of study also decreased to 84% after controlled and 88% after immediate release oxybutynin (p = 0.7). Continence was achieved in 41% of the controlled and 40% of the immediate release group (p = 0.9). Dry mouth of any severity was reported by 68 and 87% of the controlled and immediate release groups, respectively (p = 0.04), and moderate or severe dry mouth occurred in 25 and 46%, respectively (p = 0.03).
                Participants taking a single daily does of controlled release oxybutynin had similar reductions in urge incontinence and total incontinence episodes compared to those taking oxybutynin 1 to 4 times daily. A lower incidence of dry mouth was reported for controlled release oxybutynin. A proportion of patients with detrusor hyperreflexia who are unresponsive to oral oxybutynin often benefit from intravesical oxybutynin instillation. To our knowledge the precise mode of action of this method is obscure.
                In 12 patients with detrusor hyperreflexia who were previously unresponsive to oral and intravesical passive diffusion of 5 mg. oxybutynin we administered 5 mg. oxybutynin orally as well as increased doses of 15 mg. oxybutynin intravesically with passive diffusion and with 15 mA. associated electric current. Each administration mode per patient was associated with an 8-hour urodynamic monitoring session during which oxybutynin and N-desethyl oxybutynin plasma levels, and intravesical oxybutynin uptake were measured.
                A dose of 5 mg. oxybutynin orally induced no urodynamic improvement with an area under the plasma concentration time curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin of 16,297 ng./8 hours and an area under the curve ratio of N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin of 11:1. Passive diffusion oxybutynin resulted in 12 mg. oxybutynin intravesical uptake and significant improvement in 3 of 8 urodynamic measurements, although the area under the curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin was only 2,123 ng./8 hours and the N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin ratio was 1.1:1.0. Electromotive administration of oxybutynin resulted in almost complete intravesical uptake of the 15 mg. dose, significant improvement in all 8 urodynamic measurements and an increased oxybutynin level versus oral and passive diffusion, although the area under the curve of combined N-desethyl oxybutynin plus oxybutynin was 4,574 ng./8 hours and the N-desethyl oxybutynin-to-oxybutynin ratio was inverted at 1.0:1.4. The oral dose of 5 mg. oxybutynin caused anticholinergic side effects in 8 of the 12 patients. Neither intravesical passive diffusion nor electromotive administration caused side effects with an uptake of 12 and 15 mg., respectively.
                A large proportion of intravesical oxybutynin is sequestered, probably in the urothelium. Intravesical oxybutynin administration confers therapeutic benefits via localized direct action within the bladder wall. • To show the superior efficacy of fesoterodine over tolterodine extended release (ER) in a placebo-controlled overactive bladder (OAB) trial with predefined treatment comparisons for both diary measures and patient-reported outcomes.
                • In this 12-week, double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects reporting >1 urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episode and ≥8 micturitions per 24 h at baseline were randomized to fesoterodine (4 mg for 1 week, 8 mg for 11 weeks), tolterodine ER 4 mg, or placebo. • Subjects completed 3-day bladder diaries, the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) and the Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 1, 4 and 12 and the OAB Questionnaire at baseline and week 12.
                • A total of 2417 subjects were randomized. At week 12, fesoterodine 8 mg showed superiority over tolterodine ER 4 mg and placebo on UUI episodes (primary endpoint), micturitions, urgency and most other diary endpoints, and on the PPBC, UPS and all OAB Questionnaire scales and domains (all P < 0.05). • Superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was seen as early as week 4 (3 weeks after escalation to fesoterodine 8 mg). At week 1, fesoterodine 4 mg was superior to placebo on most diary variables, the PPBC and the UPS (all P < 0.05). Dry mouth and constipation rates were 28% and 4% with fesoterodine, 13% and 3% with tolterodine ER, and 5% and 2% with placebo. • Discontinuation rates as a result of adverse events were 5%, 3% and 2% for fesoterodine, tolterodine ER and placebo, respectively.
                • In this randomized study, which is the largest to compare antimuscarinic efficacy performed to date, fesoterodine 8 mg was superior to tolterodine ER 4 mg for UUI episodes, micturitions and urgency episodes, as well as for self-reported patient assessments of bladder-related problems, urgency, symptom bother and health-related quality of life. • The superiority of fesoterodine 8 mg over tolterodine ER 4 mg was observed as early as 3 weeks after escalation from fesoterodine 4 mg for most outcomes. These data may have important implications for the clinical management of OAB patients previously treated with tolterodine ER.
                © 2010 THE AUTHORS. BJU INTERNATIONAL © 2010 BJU INTERNATIONAL. To compare the effects of propiverine and oxybutynin on ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) parameters, safety, and tolerability in patients with overactive bladder.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, crossover study. Patients (n = 77) received two of the following treatments during two 2-week periods: propiverine 20 mg once daily, propiverine 15 mg three times daily, oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily, and placebo. AUM parameters, salivary flow, visual near point, and heart rate were assessed.
                A consistent order in the efficacy between active treatment groups was observed for the reduction in mean involuntary detrusor contractions (IDCs; oxybutynin 15 mg </= propiverine 45 mg </= propiverine 20 mg). Differences between the oxybutynin and propiverine 20 mg groups were statistically significant for several AUM endpoints. Statistically significant differences between the oxybutynin and both propiverine groups were also noted in salivary flow rate and heart rate (oxybutynin 15 mg < both propiverine regimens) and in heart rate variability (both propiverine regimens < oxybutynin 15 mg). All active treatments lengthened visual near point. The incidence of dry mouth was significantly more pronounced in the oxybutynin group than in either propiverine group. Treatment with propiverine 45 mg resulted in the highest rates of constipation, lengthening of the visual near point, and effects on heart rate.
                Oxybutynin 15 mg was more effective than propiverine 20 mg in reducing symptomatic and asymptomatic IDCs in ambulatory patients. The primary differences between the two drugs were the incidence and type of adverse events, which varied with the antimuscarinic receptor specificity of each agent. Two of the principal drugs used to treat detrusor instability, oxybutinin hydrochloride and propantheline bromide, were compared using clinical and urodynamic outcome measures in a randomized crossover trial with a patient-regulated variable dose regimen. Of the 23 women in the trial, 14 reported subjective improvement during treatment with oxybutinin hydrochloride compared with 11 during treatment with propantheline bromide. Apart from a greater increase in the maximum cystometric capacity with oxybutinin, there were no other objective differences between the two drugs. Oxybutinin significantly delayed the first desire to void, increased the maximum cystometric capacity and reduced the maximum detrusor pressure rise on filling. Propantheline significantly increased the maximum cystometric capacity and reduced the maximum detrusor pressure rise on filling. Three patients stopped treatment due to side-effects. Oxybutynin has long been used for the treatment of patients with detrusor overactivity and urinary urge incontinence. The short half-life of oxybutynin administered as a conventional tablet formulation or syrup requires 2-3 times daily dosage to be effective. A new controlled release (CR) tablet for once-daily administration has been developed. The efficacy and tolerability of this new controlled release tablet was compared to that of a 5-mg conventional oxybutynin tablet administered twice daily. Seventeen female incontinent patients were studied in a double-dummy crossover trial. Efficacy and tolerability were assessed by using a voiding diary, pad-weighing test, visual-analogue scale (VAS), and questionnaire. Adverse events were recorded spontaneously on a questionnaire by the patients themselves throughout the study. Serum concentrations of oxybutynin and its active metabolite N-desethyloxybutynin were studied after both a single dose and multiple dosage. There was no difference in efficacy between the two formulations. Depending on the parameters tested, the change from baseline values in a positive direction ranged from 15 to 53%. The incidence of adverse events was similar with both formulations. Oxybutynin or its metabolite showed no cumulation during the multiple dosage with a 10-mg CR tablet. The controlled release tablet formulation is as effective and as well-tolerated as the conventional one, but has the advantage of only once-a-day dosage, enhancing treatment compliance. We tested the efficacy and side effect profiles of intravesical atropine compared to oxybutynin immediate release when used by individuals with multiple sclerosis.
                We performed a study to determine the most effective dose of atropine. Eight participants used increasing doses of intravesical atropine during a 12-day period. Bladder diary data showed that the instillation of 6 mg atropine 4 times daily was most effective for increasing bladder capacity (voided/catheter volumes). We then did a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. Participants received 14 days of treatment with oral oxybutynin or with intravesical atropine, followed by 14 days of alternative treatment. Participants recorded a bladder diary and rated side effects and quality of life. The primary outcome variable was bladder capacity.
                A total of 57 participants with multiple sclerosis completed the study. Average change in bladder capacity was higher in the atropine arm. The mean +/- SD oxybutynin change was 55.5 +/- 67.2 ml, the mean atropine change was 79.6 +/- 89.6 ml and the mean difference between arms was 24.1 ml (95% CI -0.4, 49.7; p = 0.053). Changes in incontinence events and voiding frequency were not statistically different between the arms. Changes in total side effect and dry mouth scores were significantly better in the atropine treatment arm.
                Intravesical atropine was as effective as oxybutynin immediate release for increasing bladder capacity and it was probably better with less antimuscarinic side effects. We recommend that intravesical atropine should be made available to patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and voiding problems requiring intermittent catheterization as an alternative to oral therapy, which often has troublesome side effects. Prospective randomized trial to compare two low starting doses of oxybutynin, using an incremental regimen to assess patient compliance and treatment efficacy in the long-term.
                Women with detrusor overactivity were included. Oxybutynin was randomly prescribed with a starting dose of either 2.5 mg bd or 5 mg nocte. Instructions were given to increase oxybutynin up to 5 mg tds over a period of 6 weeks fortnightly. After two years we re-contacted all the women, using a specific questionnaire to assess the efficacy, acceptability and compliance with these two different regimens. Twenty-two women in each group were calculated to show a 5% difference with a significance of 0.05 and a power of 0.9. The chi2-test was used to compare the two groups and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.
                Ninety-six women were included; 66 (68.75%) (mean age 57.5 years) responded to our questionnaire. Twenty-seven had a starting dose of 2.5 mg oxybutynin twice a day and 39 of 5 mg nocte. 34.8% complained of side effects. Only 19 (43.2%) out of the 44, not on medication anymore abandoned oxybutynin for adverse reactions. Most of the patients stopped oxybutynin within 4 months. 53.0% reported improvement or cure. 39.4% denied any benefit and 7.6% (none still on oxybutynin) did not answer. The two groups did not differ for duration of treatment, improvement with oxybutynin, maximum dose they reached, the present dose, and the present urinary symptoms.
                This study did not show any advantage in efficacy or compliance with oxybutynin when two different regimens of low starting were used. Two-thirds of patients discontinued the therapy within 4-6 months. Therefore, patients on anticholinergics should be reassessed after 6 months in clinical practice. We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and safety of the new antimuscarinic agent fesoterodine relative to placebo for overactive bladder syndrome.
                This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter trial performed in the United States. Overall 836 subjects with urinary frequency, urinary urgency or urgency urinary incontinence were randomized to placebo (274), 4 mg fesoterodine (283) or 8 mg fesoterodine (279) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in the number of micturitions per 24 hours. Co-primary end points were the change in the number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours and the treatment response. Secondary efficacy end points were other bladder diary variables, such as the change in mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating adverse events, electrocardiograms, post-void residual urine volume, laboratory parameters and treatment withdrawals.
                Treatment with 4 or 8 mg fesoterodine resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements from baseline to end of treatment for the primary and co-primary end points compared with placebo (p <0.05). Results for most secondary end points, including mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours, were also significantly improved vs placebo. The adverse events reported more frequently with fesoterodine than with placebo were dry mouth, constipation and urinary tract infection.
                The 2 doses of fesoterodine were well tolerated and they statistically significantly improved overactive bladder symptoms. The aims of this study were to determine whether oral trospium chloride is noninferior to oxy-butynin for urinary urge incontinence and to evaluate its efficacy, tolerability, and health-related quality of life parameters.
                In this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter, Phase IIIb trial conducted in Germany, male and female outpatients aged >or=18 years with documented urinary frequency (>or=8 micturitions/24 hours) plus urge incontinence (>or=5 episodes/week) were randomized to receive oral treatment with trospium chloride 15 mg TID or oxybutynin hydrochloride 2.5 mg TID for 12 weeks. Daily doses could be adjusted upward after 4 weeks, to 90 mg of trospium (30 mg TID) and 15 mg of oxybutynin (5 mg TID), respectively, if needed. The absolute reduction in weekly episodes of urinary urge incontinence was evaluated as the primary efficacy variable. Secondary variables included the absolute reduction of micturitions per 24 hours, intensity of urgency, and mean voided volume. Qualitative symptom changes were recorded from the patients' entries in their micturition diaries at baseline, at week 4, and at week 12 of treatment. Subjective treatment outcome was assessed by patient ratings on a visual analog scale (VAS), the King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ), and the 36-Item Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36); intensity of dry mouth was also recorded on a scale. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.
                Of the 1658 patients treated, 828 patients (49.9%) received trospium 45 mg/d and 830 patients (50.1%) received oxybutynin 7.5 mg/d. After 4 weeks, daily doses were doubled in 29.2% (242/828) of patients in the trospium chloride group, and in 23.3% (193/830) of patients in the oxybutynin group, until the end of treatment. No clinically relevant differences in demographic characteristics were observed between the treatment groups. Trospium was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride in terms of the reduction in the number of weekly urge incontinence episodes after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. In the per-protocol population, the median change after 12 weeks was -11.0 in both groups. In the full analysis set, the median change was -10.42 with trospium chloride and -10.00 with oxybutynin (P < 0.001 for the noninferiority hypothesis, for both the per-protocol and the full analysis set calculations). There was also no indication of a difference between groups concerning the observed reductions of daily micturitions and intensity of urgency as well as the increase in micturition volume at the end of 12 weeks. VAS, KHQ, and SF-36 scores were improved to a similar extent in both treatment groups at the end of treatment. Worsening of dry mouth was less common in the trospium group than in the oxybutynin group after 4 and 12 weeks (46.9% vs 63.9% and 51.2% vs 64.4%, respectively; bothtime points, P < 0.001 between groups). Treatment-related AEs were reported by 22.7% (188/828) of the trospium chloride group and 26.5% (220/830) of the oxybutynin group. Dry mouth was the most frequently occurring AE, reported by 4.1% (34/828) of patients in the trospium group and 7.7% (64/830) of the oxybutynin group.
                Our findings indicate that trospium chloride was noninferior to oxybutynin hydrochloride, both with flexible dosing, over 12 weeks in these patients with urinary urge incontinence. Both drugs were generally well tolerated in the population studied, but fewer patients who received trospium reported worsening of dry mouth than those who received oxybutynin. German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Registration Number 4022383.
                Copyright 2009 Excerpta Medica Inc. All rights reserved. In this phase 3 trial we assessed the efficacy of solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg daily in patients with symptoms related to overactive bladder. In addition, we assessed the safety and acceptability of solifenacin.
                The study was a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial. Patients were randomized to 12-week once daily treatment with solifenacin 5 mg, solifenacin 10 mg or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was changed from baseline to study end point in mean number of micturitions per 24 hours. Secondary efficacy variables included changes from baseline in mean number of urgency, nocturia and incontinence episodes per 24 hours, and mean volume voided per micturition.
                Compared with changes obtained with placebo (-1.59), micturitions per 24 hours were statistically significantly decreased with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.37, p = 0.0018) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.81, p = 0.0001). A statistically significant decrease was observed in the number of incontinence episodes with both solifenacin doses (5 mg, p = 0.002 and 10 mg, p = 0.016). This effect was also seen for episodes of urge incontinence (5 mg, p = 0.014 and 10 mg, p = 0.042). Of patients reporting incontinence at baseline, fully 50% achieved continence after treatment with solifenacin. Episodes of nocturia were statistically significantly decreased in patients treated with solifenacin 10 mg (-0.71, -38.5%) versus placebo (-0.52, -16.4%, p = 0.036). Episodes of urgency were statistically significantly reduced with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.84, -51%, p = 0.003) and solifenacin 10 mg (-2.90, -52%, p = 0.002). Mean volume voided per micturition was statistically significantly increased with both solifenacin doses (p = 0.0001). Treatment with solifenacin was well tolerated. Dry mouth, mostly mild in severity, was reported in 7.7% of patients receiving solifenacin 5 mg and 23% receiving solifenacin 10 mg (vs 2.3% with placebo).
                In this study treatment with solifenacin 5 mg and 10 mg once daily significantly improved all the major symptoms of overactive bladder including frequency, urgency and incontinence. Solifenacin 10 mg also decreased the frequency of nocturia. Solifenacin therapy was associated with a favorable tolerability profile and a low incidence of dry mouth, especially at the 5 mg starting dose. To investigate the efficacy and safety of tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent, and define the optimum dosage in patients with symptoms of detrusor instability (urgency, increased frequency of micturition and/or urge incontinence).
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study was carried out; after a 1-week run-in period to establish baseline values, 81 patients were randomized to receive placebo or tolterodine 0.5, 1, 2 or 4 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Micturition (diary) variables, urodynamics and subjective urinary symptoms were assessed after 2 weeks' treatment.
                A per-protocol analysis of efficacy in 64 patients showed dose-related improvements in recorded micturition and urodynamic variables, e.g. at a dosage of 2 mg twice daily, the frequency of micturition, episodes of incontinence and pad use were reduced by 20%, 46% and 29%, respectively, while the volume at first contraction increased by 89 mL. The 4 mg dosage was associated with a large increase in residual urinary volume and an increased incidence of dry mouth. The incidence of adverse events (mainly mild or moderate antimuscarinic effects) was comparable with placebo at tolterodine dosages of < or = 2 mg. No serious adverse events were observed and tolterodine had no clinically significant impact on electrocardiographic or laboratory findings.
                The results indicate that tolterodine offers an effective treatment for the symptoms of detrusor instability. The optimum dosage appears to be 1-2 mg twice daily. To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and safety of darifenacin, a once-daily M3) selective receptor antagonist (M3 SRA), in patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
                This multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study enrolled 561 patients (19-88 years; 85% female) with OAB symptoms for >6 months, and included some patients with prior exposure to antimuscarinic agents. After washout and a 2-week placebo run-in, patients were randomised (1:4:2:3) to once-daily oral darifenacin controlled-release tablets (3.75 mg [n=53], 7.5 mg [229] or 15 mg [n=115]) or matching placebo (n=164) for 12 weeks. Patients recorded daily incontinence episodes, micturition frequency, bladder capacity (mean volume voided), frequency of urgency, severity of urgency, incontinence episodes resulting in change of clothing or pads and nocturnal awakenings due to OAB using an electronic diary during weeks 2, 6 and 12 (directly preceding clinic visits). Tolerability data were evaluated from adverse event reports.
                Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg had a rapid onset of effect, with significant improvement compared with placebo being seen for most parameters at the first clinic visit (week 2). This effect was sustained through week 12. At this time the number of incontinence episodes per week was reduced from baseline by 67.7% with darifenacin 7.5 mg and 72.8% with darifenacin 15 mg compared with 55.9% with placebo (p=0.010 and p=0.017, respectively, versus placebo). The 3.75 mg group (null dose arm) was included for proof of concept of dose flexibility, therefore formal sample sizing and statistical analysis were not performed for this group. Darifenacin 7.5 mg and 15 mg, respectively, were significantly superior to placebo for improvements in micturition frequency (p<0.001, p<0.001), bladder capacity (p<0.040, p<0.001), frequency of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.005), severity of urgency (p<0.001, p=0.002) and number of incontinence episodes leading to a change in clothing or pads (p<0.001, p=0.002). There was no significant reduction in nocturnal awakenings due to OAB. The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate dry mouth and constipation. However, no patients withdrew from the study as a result of dry mouth and discontinuation related to constipation was rare (0.6% placebo versus 0.9% darifenacin). In addition, there was a low need for laxative use, with no difference between the darifenacin groups and those taking placebo. There were no reports of blurred vision and the CNS and cardiac safety profile was comparable to placebo.
                Darifenacin significantly improves the major symptoms of OAB. No significant CNS (primarily M1-receptor mediated) adverse events or cardiac (primarily M2-receptor mediated) adverse events were identified in this study, as may be predicted from the M3 selective receptor profile of darifenacin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover, safety study of darifenacin versus oxybutynin was carried out on 76 patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Adults with OAB received 2 weeks each of darifenacin 15 and 30 mg once daily (q.d.), oxybutynin 5 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) and placebo, in random sequence at 10-day intervals. Darifenacin and oxybutynin significantly reduced incontinence episodes, and the number/severity of urgency episodes (all P<0.05 versus placebo). Improvements in OAB symptoms with darifenacin were dose-dependent. Dry mouth was less common with darifenacin 15 mg than oxybutynin (13% and 36%; P<0.05), while constipation was comparable (10% and 8%, respectively). Corresponding rates for darifenacin 30 mg were 34% and 21%, respectively. Patients only reported blurred vision or dizziness with oxybutynin (3% and 2%, respectively). Darifenacin (15 mg q.d.) provides comparable efficacy with improved tolerability versus oxybutynin (5 mg t.i.d.) in the treatment of patients with OAB. To compare the efficacy of tolterodine and oxybutynin in the treatment of specific, according to their urodynamic grade of severity, populations with overactive detrusor.
                In this open, randomized, two-way crossover study 128 women with urodynamically confirmed, idiopathic detrusor overactivity were recruited. Patients were categorized in 4 grades of severity groups, according to the characteristics of the first overactive detrusor contraction during filling cystometrogram: high volume-low pressure (grade-group I), high volume-high pressure (grade-group II), low volume-low pressure (grade-group III) and low volume-high pressure (grade-group IV). The primary outcome measure was average volume of voided urine per micturition.
                107 patients successfully completed the study protocol and were included in the analyses: 40 in group IV, 36 in III, 25 in II and 6 in group I. In groups IV and III both oxybutynin and tolterodine significantly increased the average volume of voided urine per micturition but the differences between the drugs were not significant (p > 0.05). In group II neither of the drugs achieved significant changes in the outcome measure (p > 0.05).
                Tolterodine and oxybutynin are clinically equipotent in treating detrusor overactivity in specific severity groups of patients, although urodynamic effects are somewhat different. Treatment with the antimuscarinic agents tolterodine and oxybutynin is the mainstay of therapy for overactive bladder, a chronic and debilitating condition characterized by urinary urgency with or without urge incontinence, usually in combination with urinary frequency and nocturia. This study consisted of two trials; in one, patients with overactive bladder were randomized to 8 weeks of open-label treatment with either 2 mg or 4 mg of once-daily extended-release tolterodine (TER), and in the other to 5 mg or 10 mg of extended-release oxybutynin (OER). The study protocol and design were identical for the two trials and site selection ensured that there was no bias in either trial for the tendency of investigators to prescribe one drug rather than the other, or for geographical location. A total of 1289 patients were enrolled, 669 in the tolterodine trial (TER 2 mg, n = 333; TER 4 mg, n = 336) and 620 in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg, n = 313; OER 10 mg, n = 307). Fewer patients prematurely withdrew from the trial in the TER 4 mg group (12%) than either the OER 5 mg (19%; p = 0.01) or OER 10 mg groups (21%; p = 0.002). More patients in the OER 10 mg group than the TER 4 mg group withdrew because of poor tolerability (13% vs 6%; p = 0.001). After 8 weeks, 70% of patients in the TER 4 mg group perceived an improved bladder condition, compared with 60% in the TER 2 mg group, 59% in the OER 5 mg group and 60% in the OER 10 mg group (all p < 0.01 vs TER 4 mg). Response to therapy was greater in a subgroup of patients whose perception of bladder condition was moderate to severe at baseline (TER 4 mg 77% vs OER 10 mg 65%; p < 0.01). Dry mouth was dose-dependent with both agents, although differences between doses only reached statistical significance in the oxybutynin trial (OER 5 mg vs OER 10 mg; p = 0.05). Patients treated with TER 4 mg reported a significantly lower severity of dry mouth compared with OER 10 mg. In conclusion, the greater efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine ER 4 mg suggests improved clinical effectiveness compared with oxybutynin ER 10 mg. To assess the efficacy, incidence of dry mouth and overall satisfaction with initial doses of 5, 10 and 15 mg of a new, once-daily, controlled-release (CR) form of oxybutynin for treating urge urinary incontinence (UUI).
                Patients who reported urinary incontinence (UI) (one or more episodes/diary) and voiding frequency (eight or more voids/day) or urgency (one or more episodes/diary) during a 2-week baseline were randomized to once-daily 5, 10 or 15 mg CR oxybutynin for 4 weeks. Daily episodes of UI, voids, urgency, adverse events, dry mouth and satisfaction were recorded in a 3-day diary at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. In all, 237 patients were randomized and evaluated.
                Episodes of UI, voids and urgency were significantly reduced over the study period at all doses. Daily UI episodes were significantly lower with 15 mg/day than 5 and 10 mg/day. Dry mouth symptoms were similar in the 10 and 15 mg/day groups, and higher than in the 5 mg/day group. However, significantly greater overall satisfaction was reported with 15 than 5 mg/day.
                There were significant dose-response relationships with CR oxybutynin for both UI episodes and dry mouth. The greatest satisfaction was with 15 mg/day, and the severity of dry mouth was comparable at 10 mg/day, indicating that greater efficacy at the higher dose did not compromise tolerability. To assess the tolerability and efficacy of propiverine and oxybutynin in patients with urgency and urge incontinence in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
                In all, 366 patients (149 on propiverine, 145 oxybutynin and 72 placebo, ratio 2:2:1) with urgency and urge incontinence were recruited in 32 study centres. Propiverine (group 1, 15 mg three times daily), oxybutynin (group 2, 5 mg twice daily) or placebo (group 3) were administered for 4 weeks, using the double-dummy technique. The dosages were selected specifically to compare the tolerability profile of propiverine with the commonly used therapeutic dosage of oxybutynin. Tolerability was assessed by directly questioning the patients about adverse events at four visits (V-1 before and V0 after a 1-week 'washout' period, V1 after 1 week and V4 after 4 weeks of treatment) during a 5-week surveillance period, and by tolerability ratings of the physicians. Efficacy was assessed using urodynamics at V0 and V4, evaluating the cystometric bladder capacity at maximal and first desire to void, and postvoid residual urine, according to the criteria of the International Continence Society. Additionally, a voiding protocol, overall assessment of clinical symptomatology and efficacy ratings by the physicians were documented.
                A remarkably high percentage of adverse events was reported in the washout period (VO: 13%, 16% and 18% in groups 1-3, respectively). At V4, the clinically most relevant symptom (dry mouth) occurred in 53% of patients in group 1, in 67% of group 2 and in 28% of group 3. Furthermore, dry mouth was less severe in group 1 than group 2. In contrast to groups 2 and 3, only patients in group 1 showed increasing tolerability during the treatment (from V1 to V4). These tolerability results were further supported by the overall tolerability assessment ('very good' or 'good' tolerability in 67% of group 1, in 59% of group 2 and in 83% of group 3). The urodynamic assessment of efficacy (comparing V0 and V4) showed a statistically significant increase in the mean (sd) maximal cystometric bladder capacity in group 1, being 222 (77) mL at V0 and 311 (125) mL at V4, an increase of 89 (108) mL, and in group 2, at 226 (75) mL and 322 (123) mL, an increase of 96 (106) mL, compared with group 3, at 211 (77) mL and 263 (93) mL, an increase of only 52 (92) mL. The cystometric bladder capacity at first desire to void also increased in group 1 (93 to 160 mL) and group 2 (89 to 160 mL), whereas in group 3 there were only minor changes (93 to 120 mL). Changes in the residual urine volume within and between the treatment groups were minimal and clinically irrelevant. The overall assessment of efficacy showed significant differences between the drugs when compared with placebo.
                Propiverine is a safe and effective drug in the treatment of urgency and urge incontinence; it is as effective as oxybutynin, but the incidence of dry mouth and its severity is less with propiverine than with oxybutynin. The availability of alternative pharmacotherapeutics such as propiverine should reduce the therapeutic failure rate and improves the success rate in the treatment of patients suffering from urgency and urge incontinence. The efficacy and tolerability of propiverine hydrochloride (15, off 45, 60 mg/d) were evaluated in the treatment of 185 patients suffering from urgency/urge incontinence in an open, randomized, multicentre parallel-group trial lasting 21 days. The effects on bladder volume and pressure were assessed on the basis of urodynamics and micturition frequency. Subjective adverse reactions were recorded. The bladder capacity and compliance increased and bladder pressure decreased in a dose dependent manner following therapy with 15, 30, 45 and 60 mg/d. In 70% of the patients a decrease in micturition frequency was observed after 15 mg/d, and in 80% after 30 to 60 mg/d. Subjective anticholinergic symptoms were reported by 21, 40 and 28% of the patients following therapy with 30, 45 and 60 mg/d. 15 and 30 mg were the daily doses with the most favourable ratio of efficacy in micturition frequency to tolerability. The results suggest that propiverine is a safe and effective drug for the treatment of urgency and urge incontinence. Individual treatment with an initial dosage of 30 mg/d should be recommended. To compare trospium chloride (TCl), a quaternary ammonium derivative with atropine-like effects and predominantly antispasmodic activity, with oxybutynin (Oxy) in terms of efficacy and adverse effects.
                In a randomized, double-blind, multicentre trial, 95 patients with spinal cord injuries and detrusor hyper-reflexia were studied. Treatment consisted of three doses per day over a 2 week period, with either Oxy (5 mg three times daily) or with TCl (20 mg twice daily) with an additional placebo at midday. The results were evaluated with regard to changes in objective (urodynamic) data and subjective symptoms as well as the incidence/severity of adverse effects.
                With both drugs there was a significant increase in maximum bladder capacity, a significant decrease in maximum voiding detrusor pressure and a significant increase in compliance and residual urine; there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. The percentage of patients who reported severe dryness of the mouth was considerably lower (4%) in those receiving TCl 2 x 20 mg/day than in those receiving Oxy (23%) 3 x 5 mg/day. Withdrawal from treatment was also less frequent in those receiving TCl (6%) than in those receiving Oxy (16%).
                Trospium chloride and oxybutynin, judged in terms of objective urodynamic parameters, are of substantially equal value as parasympathetic antagonists. However, assessment of tolerance in terms of adverse drug effects showed that TCl had certain advantages. To assess in a phase 3a trial the efficacy of solifenacin succinate, a once-daily oral antimuscarinic agent in development at 5-mg and 10-mg dosage strengths, for the treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) (Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) compared with placebo in patients with symptoms of OAB, i.e. urgency, incontinence, and frequency, with additional objectives being to assess the safety and tolerability of solifenacin and to compare the efficacy and safety of solifenacin with tolterodine 2 mg twice daily.
                The study was an international, multicentre, randomized, double-blind, tolterodine- and placebo-controlled trial conducted at 98 centres. Adult patients with symptomatic OAB for > or = 3 months were eligible; after a single-blind 2-week placebo run-in period patients were randomized equally to a 12-week double-blind treatment with either tolterodine 2 mg twice daily, placebo, solifenacin 5 mg or 10 mg once daily. Efficacy variables included change from baseline in the mean number of urgency, incontinence and urge incontinence episodes, and change from baseline in voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void.
                In all, 1281 patients were enrolled, 1081 randomized and 1077 treated; 1033 were evaluated for efficacy. Compared with placebo, the change from baseline (-1.41, -32.7%) in the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 h was statistically significantly lower with solifenacin 5 mg (-2.85, -51.9%) and 10 mg (-3.07, -54.7%; both P < 0.001), but not with tolterodine (-2.05, -37.9%; P = 0.0511). There was a statistically insignificant decrease in episodes of incontinence with tolterodine (-1.14; P = 0.1122) but a significant decrease in patients treated with solifenacin 5 (-1.42; P = 0.008) and 10 mg (-1.45; P = 0.0038). Compared with placebo (-1.20, -8.1%) the mean number of voids/24 h was significantly lower in patients receiving tolterodine (-1.88, -15%; P = 0.0145), solifenacin 5 (-2.19, -17%) and 10 mg (-2.61, -20%; both P < 0.001). The mean volume voided/void was also significantly higher with all three active treatments (P < 0.001). Solifenacin was well tolerated; compared with placebo (4.9%), dry mouth (the most common side-effect), mostly mild, was reported in 18.6% of patients receiving tolterodine, 14.0% receiving 5 mg and 21.3% receiving 10 mg solifenacin.
                Solifenacin 5 and 10 mg once daily improved urgency and other symptoms of OAB, and was associated with an acceptable level of anticholinergic side-effects. Solifenacin demonstrated significantly favourable efficacy to side-effect ratio in treating symptomatic OAB. To compare extended-release (ER) tolterodine and immediate-release (IR) oxybutynin with placebo in Japanese and Korean patients with an overactive bladder (OAB).
                Men and women aged >or= 20 years with symptoms of urinary urgency, urinary frequency (>or= 8 micturitions/24 h), urge incontinence (>or= 5 episodes/week) and symptoms of OAB for >or= 6 months were randomized to double-blind treatment with tolterodine ER 4 mg once daily, oxybutynin IR 3 mg three times daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Efficacy assessments included changes from baseline in numbers of incontinence episodes per week, voids/24 h and mean volume voided/void. Patient perceptions of bladder condition, urgency and treatment benefit were also assessed.
                In all, 608 patients were randomized to treatment with tolterodine (240), oxybutynin (246) or placebo (122). More patients prematurely withdrew on oxybutynin (23%) than with tolterodine (10.4%) or placebo (16.4%). After 12 weeks of treatment, the median number of incontinence episodes/week was reduced significantly more in the tolterodine (79%; P= 0.0027) and oxybutynin groups (76.5%; P= 0.0168) than on placebo (46.4%). There were also significantly greater improvements in the number of voids/24 h and volume voided/void with tolterodine and oxybutynin than with placebo. More patients in the tolterodine and oxybutynin than in the placebo groups reported improvements in perceived bladder condition, ability to hold urine and treatment benefit. Patients treated with oxybutynin reported more adverse events than those treated with tolterodine or placebo. Dry mouth was significantly more common with oxybutynin than with tolterodine (53.7% vs. 33.5%; P < 0.001), and occurred in 9.8% of placebo patients.
                Tolterodine ER has similar efficacy but is better tolerated than oxybutynin IR in Japanese and Korean patients with OAB. To compare the efficacy and safety of controlled-release oxybutynin with conventional, immediate-release oxybutynin and determine rates of dry mouth.
                Patients (n = 226) who were known to be responsive to anticholinergic therapy and who had seven or more urge incontinence episodes per week were randomized to receive controlled-release oxybutynin or immediate-release oxybutynin. After an initial placebo run-in period, dosing in each began at 5 mg per day and increased weekly by 5 mg per day to a maximum of 20 mg per day or when a balance between improvement of incontinence symptoms and tolerability of side effects was achieved. Rates of urge incontinence and dry mouth were compared. Post hoc Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to describe elimination of incontinence episodes by dose and to analyze dry mouth risk by dose.
                Reductions in urge urinary incontinence episodes from baseline to the end of treatment were 18.6 to 2.9 per week (83% mean decrease) and 19.8 to 4.4 per week (76% mean decrease) in the controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin groups (P =.36), respectively. At equal doses, comparable proportions of patients in both groups reported the absence of urge incontinence (P =.85). The incidence of dry mouth increased with dose in both groups, but there was no difference in dry mouth rates between the groups: 47.7% and 59.1% for the controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin (P =.09), respectively. However, Kaplan-Meier analysis to examine first report of dry mouth at a given dose revealed that a significantly lower proportion of patients taking controlled-release oxybutynin had moderate to severe dry mouth (P =.007) or any dry mouth (P =.003) compared with those taking immediate-release oxybutynin.
                At the same daily dose, controlled- and immediate-release oxybutynin demonstrated comparable efficacy in reduction of urge incontinence episodes. The incidence of dry mouth was dose dependent but equal in both groups; first report of moderate to severe dry mouth was significantly lower in the controlled-release group. This trial was designed to investigate the effectiveness of extended release versus immediate release oxybutynin in reducing symptoms of overactive bladder in a community-dwelling female population over the age of 65.
                This was a prospective randomized 12-week, open-label study. The primary outcome was number of micturitions per 24 hours, 12 weeks after treatment. The a priori sample size estimate was 60 patients per group.
                Of the 318 women approached, only 72 women (23%) were enrolled over 34 months (33 in the immediate release group, and 39 in the extended release group). The study was stopped prematurely because of recruitment difficulties and an interim analysis revealing the need for a much larger sample than had been estimated to show a significant difference between treatments. After 12 weeks of treatment, there was no difference between the oxybutynin extended release and immediate release groups in the number of micturitions per 24 hours or in other outcomes.
                This study did not demonstrate differences between oxybutynin extended release and immediate release and in reducing symptoms of overactive bladder or quality of life, possibly because the study did not reach the necessary sample size. The difficulty in recruiting subjects for the trial likely resulted from the onerous study requirements (4 study visits required over 12 weeks) and the downtown location of the study centres: these factors would cause particular difficulties for women over age 65 with overactive bladder, for whom travelling may be a problem. Evidence is needed to guide prescribing for older patients, but designing research to obtain adequate sample sizes is difficult. Studies in older subjects should ensure that a much larger budget is allocated for recruitment than would be allocated for studies in younger subjects, that meticulous attention is paid to issues of transport and access, and that support is provided for subjects who agree to take part research. We evaluated the efficacy, patient acceptability and side effect profile of tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent for treating bladder overactivity.
                In our randomized, placebo controlled, parallel group study 123, 129 and 64 patients 18 years old or older with proved detrusor overactivity (idiopathic detrusor instability or detrusor hyperreflexia) were randomized to receive 1 or 2 mg. tolterodine, or placebo, respectively, twice daily for 12 weeks. Main outcome measures were number of voids per 24 hours, urine volume per void and episodes of urge incontinence per 24 hours on a frequency-volume chart with detailed recording of side effects.
                After 12 weeks of treatment mean number of voids per 24 hours plus or minus standard deviation decreased from 11.2 +/- 3.1 to 9.0 +/- 2.6 with the 2 mg. dosage (p = 0.0045 versus placebo). At this dose mean urine volume per void increased from 155 +/- 52 to 190 +/- 70 ml. (p <0.0001 versus placebo), while mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours decreased from 3.6 +/- 4.0 to 1.8 +/- 3.1 (p = 0.19 versus placebo). Similar efficacy was observed in patients receiving the 1 mg. dose. Severe dry mouth was reported by only 2, 1 and 2% of patients given the 1 and 2 mg. dose, and placebo, respectively. There was no clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of significant cardiac adverse events.
                Tolterodine administration resulted in a significant decrease in the frequency of voiding and improved voided volume but it was seldom associated with troublesome or severe side effects. We assessed the efficacy and safety of solifenacin compared with tolterodine for treatment of overactive bladder (OAB) in Korean patients.
                The study was randomised, double-blind, tolterodine-controlled trial in Korea. Patients had average frequency of >or= 8 voids per 24 h and episodes of urgency or urgency incontinence >or= 3 during 3-day voiding diary period. Patients were randomised to 12-week double-blind treatment with either tolterodine immediate release (IR) 2 mg twice daily (TOL4) or solifenacin 5 mg (SOL5) or 10 mg (SOL10) once daily. The outcome measure was mean change in daily micturition frequency, volume, daily frequency of urgency incontinence, urgency and nocturia from baseline to week 12. Quality of life was assessed using the King's Health Questionnaire.
                A total of 357 were randomised and 329 were evaluated for efficacy. All voiding parameters recorded in micturition diary improved after treatment in all three groups. Mean changes in volume voided were 19.30 ml (26.69%) in TOL4, 30.37 ml (25.89%) in SOL5 and 37.12 ml (33.36%) in SOL10 group (p = 0.03). Speed of onset of SOL10 efficacy on urgency incontinence was faster than that of SOL5 and TOL4. Quality of life improved in all three groups. Dry mouth was the most common adverse event; its incidence was the lowest in SOL5 group (7.63%, compared with 19.49% and 18.64% in SOL10 and TOL4 groups respectively).
                Solifenacin succinate 5 and 10 mg once daily improve OAB symptoms with acceptable tolerability levels compared with tolterodine IR 4 mg. Solifenacin 5 mg is a recommended starting dose in Korean patients with OAB. This double-blind, multicenter study compared the efficacy and tolerability of tolterodine (Pharmacia, Los Angeles, USA) with that of oxybutynin (Alza, Palo Alto, USA) in Asian patients with overactive bladder.
                Two-hundred-and-twenty-eight adults with overactive bladder symptoms were randomized to receive tolterodine 2 mg twice daily (bid) (n = 112) or oxybutynin 5 mg bid (n = 116). After 8 weeks' treatment, changes in micturition diary variables, patients' perception of treatment benefit, and tolerability endpoints were determined.
                The mean (+/- SD) number of micturitions/24 h decreased by 2.6 +/- 2.9 (-21%) with tolterodine and 1.8 +/- 4.2 (-15%) with oxybutynin (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). The mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h decreased by 2.2 +/- 2.3 (-85%) in the tolterodine group and by 1.4 +/- 1.8 (-58%) in the oxybutynin group (both P = 0.0001 vs baseline). Patient perception of treatment benefit was over 70% in each treatment group. Adverse events were significantly lower in the tolterodine group compared with oxybutynin-treated patients (55% vs 82%; P = 0.001). Dry mouth was reported by significantly fewer patients on tolterodine, compared with oxybutynin (35% vs 63%; P = 0.001) and withdrawals due to adverse events were lower in the tolterodine group than with those treated with oxybutynin (10% vs 16%). There were no safety concerns.
                Tolterodine 2 mg bid is equally or more effective than oxybutynin 5 mg bid in the treatment of Asian patients with overactive bladder, and shows significantly better tolerability. This may enhance compliance during long-term treatment. To compare the efficacy and safety of an oxybutynin transdermal delivery system (OXY-TDS) and oral, long-acting tolterodine (TOL-LA) with placebo in previously treated patients with urge or mixed urinary incontinence.
                After withdrawal of their current antimuscarinic therapy, 361 adult patients were randomized to 12 weeks of double-blind, double-dummy treatment with twice weekly OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day, daily TOL-LA 4 mg, or placebo. Evaluations included change from baseline in patient urinary diary symptoms, incontinence-specific quality of life, and safety.
                OXY-TDS 3.9 mg/day and TOL-LA 4 mg/day significantly reduced the number of daily incontinence episodes (median change -3 OXY-TDS and -3 TOL-LA versus -2 placebo; P <0.05), increased the average void volume (median change 24 and 29 mL versus 5.5 mL, P <0.01), and improved quality of life (incontinence impact questionnaire [IIQ] total score, P <0.05; Urogenital Distress Inventory Irritative Symptom subscale, P <0.05) compared with placebo. The most common adverse event for OXY-TDS was localized application site pruritus (14% versus 4% placebo) accompanied by a low incidence of systemic side effects (eg, dry mouth 4.1%). Anticholinergic adverse events occurred with greatest frequency during TOL-LA treatment (dry mouth 7.3% versus 1.7% placebo, P <0.05).
                OXY-TDS and TOL-LA are effective and comparable treatments for patients with urge and mixed incontinence. OXY-TDS improves systemic safety with regard to anticholinergic side effects. Local skin irritation occurs in some OXY-TDS patients. To compare the efficacy and tolerability of imidafenacin, a novel antimuscarinic agent, with propiverine and a placebo in Japanese patients with overactive bladder (OAB).
                Men and women having OAB symptoms were randomized to double-blind treatment with 0.1 mg of imidafenacin twice daily, 20 mg of propiverine once daily, or a placebo for 12 weeks, and assessed for efficacy and safety.
                Overall, 781 patients were randomized to imidafenacin (324), propiverine (310), or a placebo (147). After 12 weeks of treatment, a significantly larger reduction in the mean number of incontinence episodes was observed in the imidafenacin group than in the placebo group (P < 0.0001). The non-inferiority of imidafenacin compared with propiverine was confirmed for the reduction in using incontinence episodes (P = 0.0014, non-inferiority margin: 14.5%). Imidafenacin was well tolerated. The incidence of adverse events with imidafenacin was significantly lower than with propiverine (P = 0.0101). Dry mouth, the most common adverse event, was significantly more common in the propiverine group than in the imidafenacin group (P = 0.0302). There were no significant increases in either the imidafenacin or placebo group in the mean QTc interval, whereas there was a significant increase in the mean QTc interval in the propiverine group (P < 0.0001), but there were no clinical arrhythmia and clinical arrhythmic events in any of the treatment groups.
                The novel antimuscarinic agent imidafenacin at a dose of 0.1 mg twice daily was not inferior to propiverine for the reduction of incontinence episodes, and well tolerated for the treatment of OAB symptoms. To evaluate the efficacy, safety/tolerability, and dose-response relationship of imidafenacin in Japanese patients with overactive bladder.
                Men and women who had overactive bladder symptoms were randomized equally to double-blind treatment with 0.05, 0.1, or 0.25 mg of imidafenacin twice daily or a placebo for 12 weeks, and assessed for efficacy and safety.
                Overall, 401 patients were enrolled and randomized for treatment with 0.1 mg of imidafenacin/day (99 patients), 0.2 mg of imidafenacin/day (100), 0.5 mg of imidafenacin/day (101), or a placebo (101). After 12 weeks of treatment, the number of incontinence episodes was reduced in a dose-dependent manner, and a significant difference between the imidafenacin treatment and the placebo was observed (P < 0.0001). Compared with the placebo, imidafenacin caused significant reductions in urgency incontinence, voiding frequency, and urinary urgency, and a significant increase in the urine volume voided per micturition. Imidafenacin was also well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth in the imidafenacin groups increased dose-dependently. Even though the percentage of patients receiving 0.5 mg/day who discontinued treatment due to dry mouth was high (8.9%), the percentages in the 0.1 mg/day and 0.2 mg/day groups (1.0% and 0.0%, respectively) were comparable with that in the placebo group (0.0%).
                Considering the balance between efficacy and safety, 0.1 mg of imidafenacin twice daily appeared to be a clinically appropriate dose for treating overactive bladder. This dose was therefore selected for further evaluation in large-scale phase III studies. The objective of this research was to detect a minimal clinically important change (MCIC) in frequency of incontinence episodes in Japanese patients with overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) based on the change in domain scores of health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
                The patients (n = 659) enrolled for the 8 weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of an oxybutynin transdermal patch were used for the analysis. The endpoints of the study were the change in frequency of incontinence episodes and the domain scores of King's health questionnaire (KHQ) from baseline to the end of treatment. To search a threshold of the change of incontinence frequency that apparently improves patient's quality of life (QOL), we calculated mean changes of selected five KHQ domain scores for nine patient groups divided by the amount of change of incontinence frequency. A minimum value of the change of incontinence frequency in the groups with apparent improvement in the QOL scores was defined as an MCIC of incontinence frequency.
                The apparent improvement of KHQ domain scores was seen in the patient groups whose incontinence episodes decreased more than three times per week (/w) after treatment. This result was common in almost all domain scores, but more relevant for the domains related to patients' life limitations.
                Japanese OAB patients can feel their QOL improved if their incontinence episodes decrease more than 3 times/w. This suggests that the reduction of '3 times /w' is an MCIC of incontinence frequency for Japanese OAB patients. Although antimuscarinic treatment is indicated for overactive bladder, many patients discontinue it because of dry mouth. Of available antimuscarinics oxybutynin is associated with the highest dry mouth rate. We compared the safety and tolerability of 5 mg solifenacin vs 15 mg oxybutynin immediate release.
                At 12 Canadian centers a total of 132 patients with overactive bladder symptoms (greater than 1 urgency episode per 24 hours, and 8 or greater micturitions per 24 hours) were randomized to 5 mg solifenacin once daily or 5 mg oxybutynin 3 times daily for 8 weeks. The primary end point was the incidence and severity of dry mouth reported after direct questioning. Efficacy end points (3-day diary documented changes in urgency, frequency, incontinence, nocturia and voided volume), and changes on the Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and the Overactive Bladder Questionnaire were evaluated secondarily.
                Of patients on solifenacin vs oxybutynin immediate release 35% vs 83% reported dry mouth (p <0.0001). Of patients reporting dry mouth severity was graded moderate by 13% and 42% of those on solifenacin and oxybutynin immediate release, and severe by 13% and 28%, respectively (p = 0.001). Patients in each group showed improvements in efficacy end points, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire scores from baseline to treatment end.
                Significantly fewer patients on 5 mg solifenacin once daily reported dry mouth vs those receiving 5 mg oxybutynin immediate release 3 times daily. Significantly fewer patients on solifenacin reported moderate/severe dry mouth. Significantly fewer patients on solifenacin withdrew from study due to dry mouth and there were significantly fewer overall adverse events. Solifenacin and oxybutynin immediate release were efficacious in decreasing efficacy end points, and improved Patient Perception of Bladder Condition scale and Overactive Bladder Questionnaire results from baseline to treatment end.
                2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. To determine whether dose titration based on therapeutic response is superior to standard dosing of oral trospium chloride in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and, moreover, to investigate the possible underlying causes of differences in efficacy at equal doses in some patients.
                Using a double-blind approach, two groups (standard dose and adjustable dose) with a total of 80 patients were treated with trospium chloride coated tablets for a period of 3 - 5 weeks. Treatment duration and daily doses varied depending on change ofurodynamic parameters defined as therapeutic response. In Week 1, both groups started on 45 mg/day (3 x 15 mg). In the adjustable dose group, it was permissible to increase the daily dose to 90 or 135 mg/day depending on the urodynamic treatment response. In contrast, doses remained unchanged in the standard dose group although a need for dose adjustment had been recognized under the double-blind conditions. Therapeutic response was defined as improvement of at least two of the following three urodynamic parameters: bladder compliance 2 20 ml/cmH20, maximum cystometric capacity > 250 ml and maximum detrusor pressure < 40 cmH20. Changes in individual urodynamic parameters were defined as secondary efficacy variables. Primary and secondary parameters were assessed by comparing baseline values with those at the end of treatment. Therapeutic response was analyzed by using the Fisher-Yates test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test was used for secondary parameters. Trospium plasma concentration was measured to assess patient's compliance and as a tool to elucidate possible factors influencing treatment efficacy. Safety and tolerability were evaluated based on withdrawal rates and adverse events.
                Both dose groups had comparable baseline characteristics. Therapeutic response was achieved in 58% of patients in the adjustable dose group (ADG) and in 72% of those in the standard dose group (SDG, p -0.23). Clinically relevant increases in maximum cystometric capacity and bladder compliance were observed, and there was a clear decrease in detrusor pressure. After Day 7, the daily dose was increased in 52.8% of all patients in the adjustable dose group and (seemingly) in 32.5% of those of the standard dose group. Further dose escalation after Day 14 was assessed as necessary in 15% of the standard dose group and 22% of the adjustable dose group. The main changes in urodynamic parameters occurred during the first 7 days of treatment, but in some patients it takes a longer time. No statistically significant differences between plasma trospium chloride levels in the two dose groups were observed at any time, but increase of plasma concentration with higher doses became obvious when patients were differentiated to individual dose stages. In both groups, the most common treatment-related adverse event was dry mouth (ADG 35%, SDG 37%), which never led to discontinuation of treatment. Rates of other adverse events such as dry skin, dysopia, increased heart rate and gastrointestinal disorders were much lower.
                Generally, in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity daily doses of 45 mg trospium chloride can be considered as being the standard dose, and dose adjustment, e.g. due to increased body weight, might usually not be necessary. However, increased daily doses of up to 135 mg appear to be safe when prescribed in individual patients less responsive to the drug.
Where the prescribing choice is between oral immediate release oxybutynin or tolterodine, tolterodine might be preferred for reduced risk of dry mouth. With tolterodine, 2 mg twice daily is the usual starting dose but a 1 mg twice daily dose might be equally effective, with less risk of dry mouth. If extended release preparations of oxybutynin or tolterodine are available, these might be preferred to immediate release preparations because there is less risk of dry mouth.
Between solifenacin and immediate release tolterodine, solifenacin might be preferred for better efficacy and less risk of dry mouth. Solifenacin 5 mg once daily is the usual starting dose, which could be increased to 10 mg once daily for better efficacy but with increased risk of dry mouth.
Between fesoterodine and extended release tolterodine, fesoterodine might be preferred for superior efficacy but has a higher risk of withdrawal due to adverse events and higher risk of dry mouth.There is little or no evidence available about quality of life, costs, or long-term outcomes in these studies. There were insufficient data from trials of other anticholinergic drugs to draw any conclusions.