One-year, low-dose neuroleptic study of in-patients with chronic schizophrenia characterised by persistent negative symptoms. Amisulpride v. haloperidol. Long-term safety and efficacy of amisulpride in subchronic or chronic schizophrenia. Amisulpride Study Group. Amisulpride has a superior benefit/risk profile to haloperidol in schizophrenia: results of a multicentre, double-blind study (the Amisulpride Study Group). Improvement of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia with amisulpride: a comparison with haloperidol. PROD-ASLP Study Group. Improvement of schizophrenic patients with primary negative symptoms treated with amisulpride. Amisulpride Study Group. Amisulpride versus flupentixol in schizophrenia with predominantly positive symptomatology -- a double-blind controlled study comparing a selective D2-like antagonist to a mixed D1-/D2-like antagonist. The Amisulpride Study Group. Improvement of some schizophrenic deficit symptoms with low doses of amisulpride. Amisulpride versus placebo in the medium-term treatment of the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. Amisulpride, and atypical antipsychotic, in the treatment of acute episodes of schizophrenia: a dose-ranging study vs. haloperidol. The Amisulpride Study Group. Treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia with amisulpride. Amisulpride versus haloperidol in treatment of schizophrenic patients--results of a double-blind study. Clinical, EEG mapping and psychometric studies in negative schizophrenia: comparative trials with amisulpride and fluphenazine.
Amisulpride is a potent substituted benzamide antipsychotic drug claimed to improve the negative symptoms of schizophrenia, particularly at low dosage.
                Sixty long-term in-patients with schizophrenia and selected for predominant negative symptoms were randomised to receive either haloperidol or amisulpride. Over a year there was systematic dose reduction, as symptoms allowed.
                There were no significant differences between the treatment groups in the proportion receiving low-dose treatment, the control of positive symptoms, or ratings of social behaviour, side-effects or tardive dyskinesia. For negative symptoms, there were consistent but non-significant trends in favour of amisulpride. The amisulpride patients required significantly less anticholinergic medication.
                In chronically-hospitalised in-patients with schizophrenia characterised by persistent negative symptoms, amisulpride was a well-tolerated maintenance antipsychotic medication. The drug had only a limited effect in reducing negative symptoms, which were relatively stable, enduring phenomena in this sample, despite dosage reduction. Amisulpride is an atypical antipsychotic with selective affinity for dopamine D2/3 receptors. In this long-term, open, randomised, multicentre trial, patients with chronic or subchronic schizophrenia received amisulpride (n =370) or haloperidol (n = 118) for 12 months. Dosage regimens were flexible (amisulpride 200-800 mg/day, haloperidol 5-20 mg/day). Improvement in mean Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score was significantly greater for amisulpride than haloperidol (17.0 versus 12.8, P = 0.01). Positive symptoms (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] positive) improved in a similar way in each group but amisulpride caused a significantly better improvement in negative symptoms (PANSS negative) (7.1 versus 3.7, P < 0.0001). Improvements in Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and Quality of Life Scale (QLS) scores were also significantly greater in the amisulpride group (GAF -20.1 versus -13.6, P = 0.001; QLS -0.64 versus -0.30, P = 0.02). Adverse events were mainly psychiatric in nature, and occurred with similar frequency in each group (amisulpride 254/370, 69%; haloperidol 82/118, 70%). Extrapyramidal symptoms were more frequent for haloperidol (48/118, 41% versus 96/370, 26% for amisulpride), leading to a greater requirement for antiparkinsonian medication (haloperidol 66/118, 56% versus amisulpride 118/370, 32%). Haloperidol significantly aggravated parkinsonism, akathisia and involuntary movement compared to amisulpride. The overall incidence of endocrine events was comparable between groups (4% for amisulpride, 3% for haloperidol). Maintenance of efficacy was comparable in both treatment groups; 59% of amisulpride patients and 55% of haloperidol patients improved after 1 month of therapy remained improved throughout the study period. Amisulpride is effective following flexible long-term administration and significantly improves social functioning and quality of life. In a multicentre, double-blind, flexible-dose study, 199 patients with paranoid schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorders received haloperidol (10-30 mg/d) or amisulpride (400-1200 mg/d) for four months. More patients in the haloperidol group withdrew prematurely (44% vs 26%; P = 0.0077) due to a higher incidence of adverse events. Amisulpride was at least as effective as haloperidol in reducing the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score (-27.3 vs -21.9) (non-inferiority test; P < 0.001). The PANSS positive score improved to a similar extent in both groups whilst improvement in the PANSS negative score was significantly greater with amisulpride (-10.5 vs -7.2; P = 0.01). The percentage of responders on the Clinical Global Impression scale was also significantly greater with amisulpride (71% vs 47%; P < 0.001). Both the Quality of Life Scale (QLS) and the Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) improved to a significantly greater extent under amisulpride. Haloperidol was associated with a greater incidence in extrapyramidal symptoms and with a greater increase in the Simpson-Angus score than was seen with amisulpride (0.32 vs 0.02; P < 0.001). In conclusion, amisulpride is globally superior to haloperidol in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia and significantly improves patients' quality of life and social adjustment. Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopaminergic D2 and D3 receptors. This study compared 800 mg/day amisulpride and 20 mg/day haloperidol in patients with acute exacerbations of schizophrenia. This multicenter, double-blind trial involved 191 patients allocated, after a 1 to 7-day wash-out period, to amisulpride (n = 95) or haloperidol (n = 96) for 6 weeks. Improvement of mean BPRS total score was 48% for amisulpride and 38% for haloperidol (NS), whereas improvement in the Negative PANSS subscale was greater in the amisulpride group (37%) compared to haloperidol (24%) (P = 0.038). CGI scores showed a higher number of responders in the amisulpride (62%) than in the haloperidol group (44%) (P = 0.014). More extrapyramidal symptoms measured with the Simpson-Angus scale were provoked in the haloperidol group (P = 0.0009). Amisulpride is at least as effective as haloperidol in the treatment of acute exacerbations of schizophrenia, and is more effective in the treatment of negative symptoms whilst causing less parkinsonism. The goal of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of low doses of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic of the benzamide class with high affinity for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors, in the treatment of schizophrenic patients with predominantly primary negative symptoms.
                After completion of a 4-week washout period, schizophrenic patients with primary negative symptoms participated in a 12-week, multicenter double-blind trial of placebo (N = 83), amisulpride, 50 mg/day (N = 84), or amisulpride, 100 mg/day (N = 75). They were evaluated with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
                Both amisulpride treatment groups showed significantly greater improvement in negative symptoms than the placebo group. Positive symptom scores were low at baseline and changed minimally during the study, suggesting that the improvement in negative symptoms was independent of improvement in positive symptoms. The safety of amisulpride was comparable to that of placebo, and extrapyramidal symptoms were infrequent. Comparable efficacy and safety results were observed with either dose of amisulpride.
                These findings confirm and extend those of earlier placebo-controlled studies of low-dose amisulpride in the treatment of patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia. The benzamide amisulpride (ASP) is a selective D2-like dopamine antagonist, while flupentixol (FPX), a thioxanthene, blocks D2-like, D1-like and 5-HT2 receptors. To evaluate efficacy and safety of ASP and to investigate the importance of an additional D1-like antagonism for antipsychotic effects and extrapyramidal tolerability, a randomized double-blind multi- center study versus FPX as reference drug was performed for 6 weeks in 132 patients suffering from acute schizophrenia (DSM-III-R) with predominant positive symptomatology. Doses were initially fixed (ASP: 1000 mg/day; FPX: 25 mg/day) but could be reduced by 40% in case of side effects (mean daily doses: ASP: 956 mg; FPX: 22.6 mg). Intention-to-treat evaluation demonstrated significant improvement under both medications. The difference between the mean BPRS decreases of both treatment groups was 5.6 points (95% CI: 0.55; 10.65) in favour of ASP. According to CGI, 62% of patients in either drug group were treatment responders. ANCOVA analysis showed that reductions of BPRS (ASP: -42%; FPX: -32%) and SAPS (ASP: -78%; FPX: -65%) were more pronounced under ASP. Due to adverse events, significantly fewer ASP patients (6%) were withdrawn from the study (FPX: 18%). Extrapyramidal tolerability was better in the ASP group, as demonstrated by smaller increases in the Simpson-Angus Scale, the AIMS, and the Barnes Akathisia Scale in ANCOVA analyses with dosage as covariate. ASP appears to be as effective as FPX with regard to antipsychotic effects on positive schizophrenic symptomatology, while extrapyramidal tolerability is better. These conclusions have to be drawn cautiously, as dosage effects on outcome parameters cannot be entirely ruled out. The present results question the notion that additional blockade of D1-like receptors may be necessary to achieve sufficient antipsychotic effects or to improve extrapyramidal tolerability. The authors assessed the effects on primary negative symptoms of low doses of amisulpride, a substituted benzamide neuroleptic with high affinity for D2 and D3 dopamine receptors.
                Young, drug-free schizophrenic patients with pure negative symptoms participated in a 6-week double-blind trial of placebo (N = 10) or low-dose amisulpride (N = 10). They were assessed with the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms.
                Amisulpride significantly improved negative symptoms. Improvement in avolition, attentional impairment, and retardation was significantly greater with amisulpride than with placebo.
                These findings suggest that some primary negative symptoms may be directly affected by low doses of benzamide neuroleptics. Amisulpride is a substituted benzamide with high selectivity for dopamine D2 and D3 receptors. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effect of 100 mg amisulpride in patients with predominantly negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
                This was a multi-centre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind study. Patients received either amisulpride (100 mg/day) or placebo over a six-month treatment period.
                A total of 141 patients were included, 69 received amisulpride, 72 placebo. Fifty-eight patients (41%) had received neuroleptic treatment prior to inclusion. The percentage of amisulpride patients completing the study (55%) was significantly higher than that with placebo (32%), and drop-out rates due to lack of efficacy were 27% with amisulpride and 47% with placebo. All efficacy assessments were statistically in favour of amisulpride compared with placebo. The overall incidence of extrapyramidal symptoms was comparable in both groups; only five patients started anti-Parkinsonian treatment during the study (one in the placebo and four in the amisulpride group).
                Amisulpride is effective in the medium-term treatment schizophrenic patients with predominantly negative symptoms. This 4-week, double-blind, randomized study was undertaken to determine the dose-response relationship of amisulpride in 319 patients with acute exacerbation of schizophrenia. Fixed doses of amisulpride (400, 800 and 1200 mg/day) and haloperidol (16 mg/day) were compared to amisulpride, 100 mg/day, as a potentially subtherapeutic dose. Efficacy data (BPRS total score and PANSS positive subscale) in the amisulpride groups generated a bell-shaped dose-response curve, with 400 mg/day and 800 mg/day being the most effective treatments for positive symptoms. Parkinsonism did not increase significantly between baseline and endpoint with amisulpride 400, 800 and 1200 mg/day compared to the amisulpride 100 mg/day group, whereas the difference was significant for haloperidol (P<0.05). It is concluded that amisulpride 400 mg and 800 mg/day is highly effective in treating the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, with less extrapyramidal side-effects than haloperidol 16 mg/day. The efficacy of low doses of certain neuroleptics in improving negative symptoms is still controversial. This study assessed the efficacy of amisulpride, a benzamide which increases dopaminergic transmission at low doses via presynaptic dopamine receptor blockade, on negative symptoms of schizophrenia.
                The study was designed as a parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients had to fulfil DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia, Andreasen's criteria for negative schizophrenia, and to have a total score of at least 75 on the SANS; those treated with neuroleptics or antidepressants underwent a six-week placebo wash-out. One hundred and four in-patients were randomly assigned to amisulpride 100 mg/d, amisulpride 300 mg/d, or placebo for six weeks; 85 patients completed the study.
                Both amisulpride doses were significantly more effective than placebo on the primary evaluation criterion (SANS total score, MANOVA P < 0.02). No significant changes were found in positive symptoms or in extrapyramidal symptoms.
                Negative symptoms can be improved by low doses of amisulpride, favouring the hypothesis of dopaminergic hypofunction as one of the causes of negative symptoms. In a double-blind study, 41 schizophrenic patients (ICD, 9th rev.) were divided into two groups. With a flexible dose, twenty patients were treated with haloperidol, twenty-one with amisulpride. With respect to relevant criteria such as age, sex, length and degree of illness, the two groups were comparable. The study was conducted over 42 days. As early as within the first 14 days, both groups showed significant improvement with respect to their psychotic symptoms. When the two groups were compared on the basis of the BPRS subscore for the anxiety-depression syndrome, and the AMDP system subscores for the somatic-depressive syndrome and the hypochondriac syndrome, the amisulpride group showed significantly better results than the haloperidol group. The ratings on the EPS scales of Webster and Simpson revealed significantly fewer extrapyramidal side-effects in the amisulpride group. Psychotic symptoms were improved after both types of treatment. Amisulpride treatment showed better results with regard to depressive symptoms, and less tendency to generate extrapyramidal side-effects. Based on recent quantitative EEG findings of increased slow activity in negative schizophrenia indicating organicity, it was hypothesized that neuroleptics decreasing delta/theta activity should be beneficial for schizophrenics with predominantly negative symptoms. Thus, a double-blind, clinical, psychometric and neurophysiological study was carried out in 40 hospitalized patients with unproductive schizophrenia (mean age: 31 years; ICD diagnoses: 295.0, 295.1 and 295.6) who were treated randomly either with the benzamide amisulpride (AMI; n = 19) or low doses of fluphenazine (FLU; n = 21). In the first 2 weeks the daily doses were 50 mg AMI or 2 mg FLU, respectively, from the third week on up to the sixth week 100 mg AMI and 4 mg FLU. Clinical evaluations, psychometry and EEG mapping were performed on day 1 (hours 0 and 4--acute effect), on day 14 (hour 0--subacute effect) and on day 42 (hours 0 and 4--chronic and superimposed effects). Three AMI patients discontinued therapy prematurely because of productive symptoms (days 14, 28 and 35), while in the FLU group 2 patients dropped out due to depressive symptoms (days 21, 28), 1 due to productive symptoms (day 35), 1 due to ineffectiveness (day 28), and 1 because of an akinetic crisis (day 6). Statistical evaluation demonstrated a significant improvement in the AMDP apathy and Andreasen SANS score in both groups with the patients remaining severely ill as rated by the CGI. FLU-treated patients needed significantly more anticholinergic medication than the AMI-treated group. Psychometric evaluation showed in regard to the noopsyche significant improvement after subacute, chronic and superimposed AMI, while FLU-treated patients showed significant improvement only after subacute treatment. AMI was significantly superior to FLU at the hours 0 and 4 of day 42. The thymopsyche improved after subacute, chronic and superimposed administration of both compounds with a significant superiority of AMI on days 14 and 42 (4 h postdrug). EEG mapping showed a decrease of delta/theta and increase of beta activity as well as an acceleration of the centroid after acute and superimposed AMI on day 42 as compared with baseline; FLU patients exhibited a decrease of delta/theta activity and an acceleration of the total centroid too, while alpha activity was augmented and beta activity tended to be reduced. Our study demonstrated that, in addition to the new benzamide AMI, FLU in low doses may also be regarded as a neuroleptic with activating properties and may be utilized in the treatment of schizophrenics with predominantly negative symptoms.
This systematic review confirms that amisulpride is an effective 'atypical' antipsychotic drug for those with schizophrenia. Amisulpride may offer a good general profile, at least compared to high-potency 'typical' antipsychotics. It may also yield better results in some specific outcomes related to efficacy, such as improvement of global state and general negative symptoms. It might be more acceptable and more tolerable than high-potency conventional antipsychotics, especially regarding extrapyramidal side-effects.
Longer term randomised trials are needed to evaluate the comparative value of amisulpride, particularly compared to other expensive atypical antipsychotics. These should focus on important outcomes which have not been sufficiently monitored such as service use, family burden and quality of life.