The cost of treatment of psychiatric emergencies: a comparison of hospital and community services. A controlled trial of home-based acute psychiatric services. I: Clinical and social outcome. A randomized controlled trial of community-oriented and hospital-oriented care for discharged psychiatric patients: influence of personality disorder on police contacts.
This study aimed to compare the costs of treatment by community-based and hospital-based psychiatric services. The design entailed random allocation of patients presenting with psychiatric emergencies over a subsequent 3-month period to one of two services, followed by retrospective quantification of service use and its cost for each group. One hundred patients with emergency presentations to the psychiatric service via the Accident and Emergency Department, liaison psychiatrist and approved social worker were included in the study. Their use of a range of terms of service was recorded and disaggregated costings of these items of service was calculated. The use of non-psychiatric services was similar for both groups, but the use of psychiatric services differed, with the hospital group making greater use of in-patient beds and the community group employing more frequent home-based interventions. The total cost of treatment for the community group (pound 56,000) was much lower than for the hospital group (pound 130,000), although the median patient cost was 50% higher in the community group (pound 938 v. pound 610), and a greater proportion of the community service expenditure (10% v. 2%) was due to failed contacts. Taken together with clinical outcome, which showed no advantages for the hospital-based service over the community-based service, our findings suggest that this form of community psychiatric service is a cost-efficient alternative to hospital-based care for this group of patients. While research has shown community-based psychiatric care to be as good as, or better than, hospital-based care, generalisation to clinical practice has been difficult. This prospective, randomised controlled study examined a community-based approach feasible within NHS conditions. Ninety-four patients were randomly allocated to experimental and 78 to control treatments and followed for one year. The groups were well matched apart from an excess of psychotic control patients. No differences in clinical or social functioning outcome were found. Both groups improved substantially on clinical measures in the first six weeks, with some slow consolidation thereafter. There were three suicides in the control group and one in the experimental group. Access to care was better in the experimental group (93% attended assessment) than in the control group (75% attended assessment). An important forensic psychiatric measure, contacts with police, was compared in a randomized, controlled trial of 155 patients with severe mental illness with a previous admission within the past two years. The patients, who also had their personality status addressed formally before randomization, were allocated to community multidisciplinary teams or to hospital-based care programs after discharge from in-patient care and were followed up for one year. A total of 138 patients (89%) had at least one post-baseline assessment and of these patients, 16 (12%) had at least one police contact in the year of the study, most of which were emergency assessments. The data showed significantly greater numbers of police contacts in patients with increasing severity of personality disturbance. Patients with such disturbance were six times more likely to have police contacts than those with no personality disorder. There were significantly more contacts in patients with borderline and antisocial (dissocial) personality disorder allocated to community-oriented care compared with hospital-oriented care. These findings have important implications for risk assessment in severe mental illness.
Community mental health team management is not inferior to non-team standard care in any important respects and is superior in promoting greater acceptance of treatment. It may also be superior in reducing hospital admission and avoiding death by suicide. The evidence for CMHT based care is insubstantial considering the massive impact the drive toward community care has on patients, carers, clinicians and the community at large.