Megestrol acetate for anorexia in patients with far-advanced cancer: a double-blind controlled clinical trial. Usefulness of megestrol acetate in cancer cachexia and anorexia. A placebo-controlled study. Megestrol acetate vs cyproheptadine in the treatment of weight loss associated with HIV infection. Prospective randomised trial of two dose levels of megestrol acetate in the management of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in patients with metastatic cancer. Randomized comparison of megestrol acetate versus dexamethasone versus fluoxymesterone for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia. Effect of megestrol acetate on weight loss, body composition and blood screen of gastrointestinal cancer patients. Randomized phase III clinical trial of a combined treatment with carnitine + celecoxib ± megestrol acetate for patients with cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome. Treatment of cancer weight loss in patients with advanced lung cancer. Comparing megestrol acetate therapy with oxandrolone therapy for HIV-related weight loss: similar results in 2 months. Improved quality of life with megestrol acetate in patients with endocrine-insensitive advanced cancer: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Australasian Megestrol Acetate Cooperative Study Group. Megestrol acetate in cancer anorexia and weight loss. The safety and pharmacokinetics of single-agent and combination therapy with megestrol acetate and dronabinol for the treatment of HIV wasting syndrome. The DATRI 004 Study Group. Division of AIDS Treatment Research Initiative. Megestrol acetate for cachexia and anorexia in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized study comparing two different doses. Usage of megestrol acetate in the treatment of anorexia-cachexia syndrome in the elderly. Controlled trial of megestrol acetate for the treatment of cancer anorexia and cachexia. Megestrol acetate stimulates weight gain and ventilation in underweight COPD patients. Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS and cachexia. [Supportive treatment with megestrol acetate during radio(chemo)therapy in patients with tumors in the head-neck area. A randomized study]. An eicosapentaenoic acid supplement versus megestrol acetate versus both for patients with cancer-associated wasting: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group and National Cancer Institute of Canada collaborative effort. Dronabinol versus megestrol acetate versus combination therapy for cancer-associated anorexia: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study. Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS-related cachexia. Risks and benefits of various therapies for cancer anorexia. Megestrol acetate in cancer cachexia. Effects of megestrol acetate on weight gain, body composition, and pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis.
The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose regimen of megestrol acetate (MA; 320 mg/day) on appetite in advanced cancer patients. Out-patients with far-advanced non-hormone responsive tumours and loss of appetite were randomised in a phase III trial, with two consecutive phases: a 14-day double-blind placebo controlled phase (phase A) and a 76-day open phase (phase B). During phase A, patients were treated with MA, two 160 mg tablets/day, or placebo. In phase B, the MA dose was titrated to clinical response in both groups. Appetite, food intake, body weight, performance status, mood and quality of life were evaluated with standardised measures; patients' global judgement about treatment efficacy was also requested. Of 42 patients entering the study, 33 (17 MA and 16 placebo) were evaluable for efficacy. The appetite score improved significantly with MA after 7 days (P = 0.0023), and this effect was still significant at 14 days (P = 0.0064). Patients judged the treatment with MA effective in 88.2% of cases (14th day), whilst placebo was considered effective by 25% (P = 0.0003). None of the other measures showed significant changes during treatment. The remarkable effect on appetite evident after 7 days, without serious side-effects, shows that MA can produce significant subjective effects at a low-dose even in patients with far-advanced disease. To assess the effect of megestrol acetate (MA) on the appetite and weight of cancer patients with nonhormone-dependent tumors, a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was designed. One hundred fifty patients were included: 76 were given MA (240 mg/day orally) for at least 2 months, and 74 were given placebo (P). Body weight, subjective sense of appetite (SSA) evaluated by an analogic linear visual scale scored from 1 to 10, and performance status (PS) were measured before therapy and monthly thereafter. No differences in body weight before and after treatment could be found in any group. However, 32% of the patients in the MA group (95% confidence interval: 20.1-44.6%) gained 2 or more kilograms (P less than 0.001). This group also showed an improvement in SSA (P less than 0.01): an increase greater than or equal to 2 points appeared in 57.5% of patients (95% confidence interval 44.6-69.4%). There was no significant difference in PS for the treatment groups before or after therapy. The percentage of reported adverse events did not differ significantly from one treatment group to the next. We conclude that therapy with MA at a dose of 240 mg/day improved SSA and was associated with moderate weight gain in patients with hormone-insensitive malignancies. Two appetite stimulants, megestrol acetate and cyproheptadine were administered in a randomized trial to 14 patients who had no evidence of opportunistic infection or malabsorption but were wasted (had lost more than 5 kg body weight) as a result of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Energy intakes were calculated from a 7 day weighed dietary record. Mean energy intakes per kilogramme body weight were similar in both treatment groups (greater than 34 kcal/kg) and were higher than that in well British males. Energy intakes increased by just over 500 kcal during both treatments, but fell to pretreatment levels after therapy. Patients in both treatment groups gained a moderate amount of weight. Megestrol acetate was associated with impotence in 4 patients. Insufficient calorie intake alone is not a common cause of wasting associated with HIV and the role of appetite stimulants is likely to be limited. Two doses of megestrol acetate (MA) have been prospectively compared in a random fashion as treatment for cancer-related anorexia-cachexia syndrome (ACS) in 122 patients with progressive soft tissue sarcoma, colorectal, lung, head and neck and renal cancer resistant to systemic chemotherapy. After 30 days of MA, 55% of patients receiving MA at 160 mg day-1 reported an increase in appetite, 27% of patients no variation and 18% complained of a decrease in appetite. Patients treated with MA at 320 mg day-1 reported an increase in appetite in 68% of cases, a stabilisation in 20% of cases and a decrease in 12%. Although an increase in appetite was more frequently observed in patients receiving MA at 320 mg day-1, however this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.305). After 30 days of MA, 31% of patients treated with MA at 160 mg day-1 showed an increase in body weight, 25% a stabilisation and 44% a decrease. In the group of patients treated with MA at 320 mg day-1, 45% reported an increase in body weight, 16% no change and 23% weight loss. Although there was a trend favouring the higher dose of MA, overall analysis however failed to detect any statistically significant difference between the two treatment arms (P = 0.242). Twenty-seven patients pretreated with 160 mg day-1 and 23 patients treated with 320 mg day-1 received further therapy with MA at the dose of 320 and 480 mg day-1 respectively. In the group of 22 patients treated with 320 mg day-1 four (18%) reported an increase in body weight, eight (36%) an improvement in appetite, but none had an increase in performance status. Among the 20 evaluable patients treated with 480 mg day-1, two (10%) had an increase in body weight, four (20%) an improvement in appetite, but none reported an increase in performance status. No difference in median survival was detected between the two arms. Toxicity was mild and predictable. In conclusion, the data achieved in the present study confirm the clinical safety and effectiveness of oral MA in the management of ACS in patients with advanced cancer resistant to systemic chemotherapy. Moreover, data concerning the dose escalation of MA dosage in unresponsive patients suggest that a step by step increase in MA dosage could be the best way of administering MA for the management of ACS and that the increase of MA dosage over 480 mg day-1 will probably be useless in the vast majority of cases. Data on body weight suggest that after 2 weeks' therapy MA could be stopped or its dosage tailored to patients' needs since the majority of patients respond after only 15 days of MA. Previous double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that both corticosteroids and progestational agents do partially alleviate cancer anorexia/cachexia. Pilot information suggested that an anabolic corticosteroid might also improve appetite in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The current trial was developed to compare and contrast a progestational agent, a corticosteroid, and an anabolic corticosteroid for the treatment of cancer anorexia/cachexia.
                Patients suffering from cancer anorexia/cachexia were randomized to receive either dexamethasone 0. 75 mg qid, megestrol acetate 800 mg orally every day, or fluoxymesterone 10 mg orally bid. Patients were observed at monthly intervals to evaluate weight changes and drug toxicity. Patients also completed questionnaires at baseline and at monthly intervals to evaluate appetite and drug toxicities.
                Fluoxymesterone resulted in significantly less appetite enhancement and did not have a favorable toxicity profile. Megestrol acetate and dexamethasone caused a similar degree of appetite enhancement and similar changes in nonfluid weight status, with nonsignificant trends favoring megestrol acetate for both of these parameters. Dexamethasone was observed to have more corticosteroid-type toxicity and a higher rate of drug discontinuation because of toxicity and/or patient refusal than megestrol acetate (36% v 25%; P =.03). Megestrol acetate had a higher rate of deep venous thrombosis than dexamethasone (5% v 1%; P =.06).
                Whereas fluoxymesterone clearly seems to be an inferior choice for treating cancer anorexia/cachexia, megestrol acetate and dexamethasone have similar appetite stimulating efficacy but differing toxicity profiles. Reduced food intake is probably the major cause of continuing weight loss in cancer patients. Therefore, agents which stimulate food intake may be of significant benefit to such patients. To examine this, a randomized double-blind placebo controlled study of megestrol acetate was carried out. 38 gastrointestinal cancer patients with weight loss (8-43% of pre-illness stable weight) were entered into the study. 26 were evaluable at 6 weeks and 21 at 12 weeks. Clinical details, serum biochemistry and haematology were examined at 6 and 12 weeks and total body water, total body potassium at 12 weeks after the baseline assessment. There was no significant weight change in either group over the 6 or 12 weeks. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in total body water, total body potassium, blood biochemistry or haematology between the groups over the study period. It does not appear that megestrol acetate at a dose of 480 mg/day results in weight gain in advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients with weight loss. A phase III, randomized non-inferiority study was carried out to compare a two-drug combination (including nutraceuticals, i.e. antioxidants) with carnitine + celecoxib ± megestrol acetate for the treatment of cancer-related anorexia/cachexia syndrome (CACS): the primary endpoints were increase of lean body mass (LBM) and improvement of total daily physical activity. Secondary endpoint was: increase of physical performance tested by grip strength and 6-min walk test.
                Sixty eligible patients were randomly assigned to: arm 1, L-carnitine 4 g/day + Celecoxib 300 mg/day or arm 2, L-carnitine 4 g/day + celecoxib 300 mg/day + megestrol acetate 320 mg/day, all orally. All patients received as basic treatment polyphenols 300 mg/day, lipoic acid 300 mg/day, carbocysteine 2.7 g/day, Vitamin E, A, C. Treatment duration was 4 months. Planned sample size was 60 patients.
                The results did not show a significant difference between tre atment arms in both primary and secondary endpoints. Analysis of changes from baseline showed that LBM (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and by L3 computed tomography) increased significantly in both arms as well as physical performance assessed by 6MWT. Toxicity was quite negligible and comparable between arms.
                The results of the present study showed a non-inferiority of arm 1 (two-drug combination) vs arm 2 (two-drug combination + megestrol acetate). Therefore, this simple, feasible, effective, safe, low cost with favorable cost-benefit profile, two-drug approach could be suggested in the clinical practice to implement CACS treatment.
                Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved. Megestrol acetate, a semisynthetic gestagen, is effective not only for endocrine therapy of advanced breast carcinomas, but also in the treatment of cachectic patients with aggressive, hormone-independent tumors. Sixty-six patients with therapy-resistant, advanced bronchogenic carcinomas of different histologic types, who had lost more than 10% of their regular body weight within a prospective, randomized trial, were treated with megestrol acetate at a dose of either 160 or 480 mg/day for 3-4 months. The mean weight gain for all patients was 2.5 kg. Nearly all of them (80%) reported improved appetite and well-being. The mean weight gain in the group of patients receiving 480 mg/day was higher (3.0 kg) than in the group receiving 160 mg/day (2.0 kg). Weight loss is known to impact survival among patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) even in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In a randomized trial, we compared the effects of 2 months of treatment with either megestrol acetate (800 mg every day) or oxandrolone (10 mg twice per day) on body weight and composition in patients with weight loss of > or =5 kg who were receiving HAART. The mean weight was 66 kg, and the mean body mass index was 21. Mean weight gain in the megestrol acetate and the oxandrolone arms were 2.8 kg (4.6% of the baseline value) and 2.5 kg (3.9% of the baseline value), respectively (P=.80). Lean body mass accounted for 39% of weight gain in the megestrol acetate arm and 56% in the oxandrolone arm (P=.38). Seven patients in the megestrol acetate arm and 5 patients in the oxandrolone arm reported minor adverse events (P=.74). In conclusion, megestrol acetate therapy and oxandrolone therapy have similar effects on body weight and composition and are safe and well-tolerated during HAART. To investigate the effect of two doses of megestrol acetate (MA) compared with placebo on quality of life (QoL) and nutritional status (NS) in patients with advanced endocrine-insensitive cancer.
                Two hundred forty patients were randomised to double-blind MA 480 mg/day, MA 160 mg/day, or matching placebo for 12 weeks. Nutritional status (including weight, skinfold thickness and midarm circumference) and QoL (using 6 linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) scales) were assessed at randomisation and after four, eight and 12 weeks. A QoL ranking incorporating QoL and death was also used ranging from 1 = dead to 5 = much better QoL.
                One hundred seventy-four patients were assessable at week four, 136 at week eight and 103 patients at week 12. Patients receiving MA reported substantially better appetite (P = 0.001), mood (P = 0.001) and overall quality of life (P < 0.001), and possibly less nausea and vomiting (P = 0.08) than patients receiving placebo, based on a test for trend. A larger benefit was seen with the higher dose which (unlike the lower dose) was significantly better in pairwise comparisons with placebo for appetite, mood and overall QoL (each P < or = 0.001). Despite some missing data on QoL scores, QoL ranking was available on 227 (95%) of patients with significantly higher QoL ranking associated with MA (P = 0.002). Improvements in QoL occurred early within four weeks and were sustained. No statistically significant differences were observed in NS measurements, including weight (P = 0.29). Side effects of therapy were minor and did not differ significantly across treatments.
                Megestrol acetate given at 480 mg/day is useful palliation in patients with endocrine-insensitive advanced cancer. It improves appetite, mood and overall quality of life in these patients, although not through a direct effect on nutritional status. High-dose megestrol acetate has been associated with increased appetite and weight. To examine the effects of high-dose megestrol acetate in the treatment of anorexia and weight loss in patients with advanced hormone-insensitive malignant lesions, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial was conducted. Patients receiving megestrol acetate for 1 month reported a significant improvement in appetite and adequacy of food intake compared with those receiving placebo. A three-item scale measuring appetite, adequacy of food intake, and concern about weight revealed a higher improvement with megestrol acetate than with placebo. Patients who worsened while receiving placebo had similar favorable changes after the cross over to megestrol acetate. These data indicate that megestrol acetate may improve appetite and food intake in patients with advanced cancer. This randomized, open-labeled, multicenter study was designed to assess safety and pharmacokinetics of dronabinol (Marinol) tablets and megestrol acetate (Megace) micronized tablets, alone and in combination, for treatment of HIV wasting syndrome. Weight and quality of life data were also collected. Fifty-two patients (mean CD4+ count, 59 cells/microliter) were randomized to one of four treatment arms: dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (D); megestrol acetate 750 mg/day (M750); megestrol acetate 750 mg/day+dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (M750+D); or megestrol acetate 250 mg/day+dronabinol 2.5 mg twice/day (M250+D). After therapy initiation, 47 patients returned for at least one visit, and 39 completed the planned 12 weeks of study visits. Occurrence of adverse events, drug discontinuation, new AIDS-defining conditions, or CD4+ T lymphocyte changes were not statistically significantly different among arms. Serious adverse events assessed as related to dronabinol included CNS events (e.g., confusion, anxiety, emotional lability, euphoria, hallucinations) and those assessed as related to megestrol acetate included dyspnea, liver enzyme changes, and hyperglycemia. The mean weight change +/- SE over 12 weeks was as follows: D, -2.0 +/- 1.3 kg; M750, +6.5 +/- 1.1 kg; M750+D, +6.0 +/- 1.0 kg; and M250+D, -0.3 +/- 1.0 kg (difference among treatment arms, p = 0.0001). Pharmacokinetic parameters measured after 2 weeks of therapy for M750 were Cmax = 985 ng/ml and AUC = 22,487 ng x hr/ml, and for dronabinol and its active metabolite (HO-THC), respectively, were Cmax = 2.01; 4.61 ng/ml and AUC = 5.3; 23.7 ng x hr/ml. For megestrol acetate, but not dronabinol, there was a positive correlation at week 2 between both Cmax and AUC with each of the following: (1) weight change, (2) breakfast visual analog scale for hunger (VASH) score, and (3) dinner VASH score. The primary aim of the study was to compare two different dose levels of megestrol acetate, administered for cancer-related anorexia and cachexia for 3 months.
                From August 1996 to December 2000, 119 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer were randomized to take 160 mg/day or 320 mg/day of megestrol acetate for 3 months at the Gülhane Military Medicine Academy of Ankara, Turkey. Patients were controlled at biweekly periods.
                There were 59 patients in the single dose arm (group 1) and 60 patients in the twice a day dose arm (group 2). The mean percentages of weight loss were 16.9% and 16.7% in group 1 and 2, respectively. In the first and the second month of weight gain, there were no significant differences in the two groups (P = 0.23 and P = 0.11). In the third month, weight gain was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (P = 0.038). Toxicity was similar for both dose levels.
                Megestrol acetate can be safely and effectively given to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Although lower doses of megestrol acetate can be effective for anorexia and cachexia, the higher dose level seems to be more efficient. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of megestrol acetate (MA) in geriatric cachexia. The paper presented here reviews a previously published study of MA use in 69 patients in a randomized double blind placebo-controlled trial. This paper will also address the underlying pathogenesis of cachexia (specifically, the role of cytokines) along with the use of MA, its mechanism of action and its side effects.
                To compare the effects of MA oral suspension (O.S.), 800 mg/day, versus placebo on weight in geriatric nursing home patients with weight loss or low body weight.
                Twelve weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with a 13-week follow-up period.
                Northport VAMC Nursing home patients with weight loss of * 5% of usual body weight over the past 3 months, or body weight 20% below their ideal body weight.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or MA 800 mg/d for 12 weeks and were then followed for 13 weeks off treatment and mortality 4 years post treatment.
                Primary outcome- weight and appetite change. Secondary outcome-sense of well being, enjoyment of life, change in depression scale, laboratory nutrition parameters, energy intake counts, body composition, and adverse events.
                At 12 weeks there were no significant differences in weight gain between treatment groups, while MA-treated patients reported significantly greater improvement in appetite, enjoyment of life, and well being. At week 25 (3 months after treatment), 61.9% of MA-treated patients had gained * 1.82 kg (4 lbs) compared to 21.7% of placebo patients. There was no difference in survival between MA and placebo groups. Considering possible confounders, higher initial IL-6, initial TNFR-p75 levels, and final neutrophil percentage were associated with elevated mortality, whereas higher initial pre-albumin, initial albumin, final pre-albumin, final albumin and final weight gain were associated with decreased death. Preliminary information has suggested that megestrol acetate leads to appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with breast cancer, other cancers, and AIDS. Pursuant to this, we developed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of megestrol acetate in patients with cancer-associated anorexia and cachexia. We randomly assigned 133 eligible patients to receive 800 mg of megestrol acetate per day or a placebo. Patients assigned to megestrol acetate more frequently reported improved appetite (P = .003) and food intake (P = .009) when compared with patients receiving the placebo. A weight gain of 15 lb or more over baseline was seen in 11 of 67 (16%) patients receiving megestrol acetate compared with one of 66 (2%) given the placebo (P = .003). Patients receiving megestrol acetate reported significantly less nausea (13% vs. 38%; P = .001) and emesis (8% vs. 25%, P = .009). No clinically or statistically significant toxic reactions were ascribed to megestrol acetate, with the exception of mild edema. This study convincingly demonstrated that megestrol acetate can stimulate appetite and food intake in patients with anorexia and cachexia associated with cancer, leading to significant weight gain in a proportion of such patients. To assess the effect of megestrol acetate (MA), a progestational appetite stimulant commonly used in patients with AIDS and cancer, on body weight and composition, respiratory muscle strength, arterial blood gas levels, and subjective perceptions in COPD patients.
                Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted on an outpatient basis at 18 sites.
                Underweight (< 95% ideal body weight) COPD patients > or = 40 years old.
                Either MA, 800 mg/d oral suspension, or placebo at a 1:1 ratio for 8 weeks.
                Of 145 randomized patients (63% men), 128 patients completed the trial. Body weight increased by 3.2 kg in the MA group and 0.7 kg in the placebo group (p < 0.001). Anthropometric and dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry assessments confirmed that weight gain was mainly fat. Spirometry and maximal voluntary ventilation showed no significant changes from baseline in either group, and the difference in the change in maximum inspiratory pressure between groups was not significant. The 6-min walk distances did not differ statistically between groups at week 2 and week 4, but were greater in the placebo group at week 8 (p = 0.012). Consistent with the known ability of MA to stimulate ventilation, PaCO(2) decreased (4.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and PaO(2) increased (2.8 mm Hg, p < 0.04) in the MA group. Questionnaires revealed that body image and appetite improved in the MA group but not the placebo group. Adverse event frequency and type were similar in both groups, but cortisol and testosterone (in men) levels decreased substantially in the MA group.
                We conclude that MA safely increased appetite and body weight, stimulated ventilation, and improved body image in underweight COPD patients, but did not improve respiratory muscle function or exercise tolerance. To study the effects of a megestrol acetate liquid formulation (800 mg/d) on body weight, body composition, caloric intake, and mental outlook in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who had cachexia.
                Twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Multiple clinical centers.
                100 patients with AIDS who had weight loss of 10% or more of ideal body weight were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 48) or megestrol acetate (n = 52).
                Caloric intake, body weight, body composition, and sense of well-being.
                Most patients receiving megestrol acetate had increased caloric intake resulting in body weight gain (mainly fat mass). From baseline to week 8, the megestrol acetate group increased their daily caloric intake by 608 calories, whereas the placebo group increased intake by 134 calories (difference, 474 calories; 95% CI, -68 to 880 calories). Body weight in the megestrol acetate group increased by 3.86 kg from baseline to week 8, although it decreased by 0.46 kg in the placebo group (difference, 4.32 kg; CI, 2.42 to 6.22 kg). At week 8 in the megestrol acetate group, patients gained 3.68 kg in fat mass and those in the placebo group lost 0.28 kg (difference, 3.96 kg; CI, 2.49 to 5.43 kg). Body water, lean mass, and patient survival were not statistically different between treatment groups. Patients treated with megestrol acetate had an increased sense of well-being when compared with patients who received placebo.
                This megestrol acetate liquid formulation is well tolerated, increases food intake, results in body weight gain, and improves the sense of well-being in cachectic patients with AIDS. The value of megestrol acetate in treating tumor anorexia and cachexia of terminal patients is well known. However, the supportive effect of megestrol acetate during intensive radio-(chemo-)therapy was not investigated up to now. Therefore a randomized trial was performed including patients with advanced tumors in the head and neck region.
                From June 1991 to December 1993 a total of 64 patients were admitted to a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. During and up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy patients received 160 mg/d megestrol acetate or placebo. The nutritional status (anthropometric and laboratory parameters) and the quality-of-life index according to Padilla et al. [24] were determined prior to therapy, 1, 4, 6 weeks later during radiotherapy and 12, 18 weeks after completion.
                Sixty-one out of 64 patients were evaluable (control group: n = 30; megestrol acetate patients: n = 31). One patient refused further participation after randomization. One patient in each arm was excluded due to side effects (impotence, diarrhoea). Further side effects were not observed. In the control group the nutritional parameters (body weight, triceps skinfold) and the subjective feeling of the patients deteriorated during radiotherapy and did not restore following radiotherapy. By contrast, the patients of the megestrol acetate group were able to stabilize these parameters. This difference was most prominent in the orally nourished patients (weight loss during therapy: control group: -4.1 kg; megestrol acetate group: -0.8 kg; p = 0.004); but not in the patients fed by percutaneous endoscopically guided gastrostomy (weight loss control group: -2.4 kg; megestrol acetate group: -0.8 kg; p = 0.14).
                In patients on radiochemotherapy megestrol acetate prevents patients from further deterioration of the nutritional status and quality of life. Studies suggest eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), an omega-3 fatty acid, augments weight, appetite, and survival in cancer-associated wasting. This study determined whether an EPA supplement-administered alone or with megestrol acetate (MA)-was more effective than MA.
                Four hundred twenty-one assessable patients with cancer-associated wasting were randomly assigned to an EPA supplement 1.09 g administered bid plus placebo; MA liquid suspension 600 mg/d plus an isocaloric, isonitrogenous supplement administered twice a day; or both. Eligible patients reported a 5-lb, 2-month weight loss and/or intake of less than 20 calories/kg/d.
                A smaller percentage taking the EPA supplement gained >or= 10% of baseline weight compared with those taking MA: 6% v 18%, respectively (P =.004). Combination therapy resulted in weight gain of >or= 10% in 11% of patients (P =.17 across all arms). The percentage of patients with appetite improvement (North Central Cancer Treatment Group Questionnaire) was not statistically different: 63%, 69%, and 66%, in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P =.69). In contrast, 4-week Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy scores suggested MA-containing arms experienced superior appetite stimulation compared with the EPA arm, with scores of 40, 55, and 55 in EPA-, MA-, and combination-treated arms, respectively (P =.004). Survival was not significantly different among arms. Global quality of life was not significantly different among groups. With the exception of increased impotence in MA-treated patients, toxicity was comparable.
                This EPA supplement, either alone or in combination with MA, does not improve weight or appetite better than MA alone. To determine whether dronabinol administered alone or with megestrol acetate was more, less, or equal in efficacy to single-agent megestrol acetate for palliating cancer-associated anorexia.
                Four hundred sixty-nine assessable advanced cancer patients were randomized to (1) oral megestrol acetate 800 mg/d liquid suspension plus placebo, (2) oral dronabinol 2.5 mg twice a day plus placebo, or (3) both agents. Eligible patients acknowledged that loss of appetite or weight was a problem and reported the loss of 5 pounds or more during 2 months and/or a daily intake of less than 20 calories/kg of body weight.
                Groups were comparable at baseline in age, sex, tumor type, weight loss, and performance status. A greater percentage of megestrol acetate-treated patients reported appetite improvement and weight gain compared with dronabinol-treated patients: 75% versus 49% (P =.0001) for appetite and 11% versus 3% (P =.02) for > or = 10% baseline weight gain. Combination treatment resulted in no significant differences in appetite or weight compared with megestrol acetate alone. The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy questionnaire, which emphasizes anorexia-related questions, demonstrated an improvement in quality of life (QOL) among megestrol acetate-treated and combination-treated patients. The single-item Uniscale, a global QOL instrument, found comparable scores. Toxicity was also comparable, with the exception of an increased incidence of impotence among men who received megestrol acetate.
                In the doses and schedules we studied, megestrol acetate provided superior anorexia palliation among advanced cancer patients compared with dronabinol alone. Combination therapy did not appear to confer additional benefit. To compare the effects of oral suspensions of megestrol acetate, 800 mg/d, and placebo on body weight in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related weight loss.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Outpatient community and university patient care setting.
                Consecutive patients with AIDS who had substantial weight loss and anorexia were enrolled. Of 271 patients, 270 and 195 were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or megestrol acetate (100 mg, 400 mg, or 800 mg) daily for 12 weeks.
                The primary efficacy criterion was weight gain. Patients were evaluated at 4-week intervals for changes in weight and body composition, caloric intake, sense of well-being, toxic effects, and appetite.
                For evaluable patients receiving 800 mg of megestrol acetate per day, 64.2% gained 2.27 kg (5 pounds) or more compared with 21.4% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001). An intent-to-treat analysis showed significant differences (P = 0.002) between those receiving placebo and those receiving 800 mg of megestrol acetate for the number of patients who gained 2.27 kg (5 pounds) or more (8 of 32 [25%] compared with 38 of 61 [62.3%], respectively). Compared with patients receiving placebo at the time of maximum weight change, evaluable patients receiving megestrol acetate, 800 mg/d, reported improvement in overall well-being and had an increase in mean weight gain (-0.725 compared with 3.54 kg [-1.6 compared with +7.8 pounds]; P < 0.001), lean body mass (-0.772 compared with +1.14 kg [-1.7 compared with +2.5 pounds]; P < 0.001), appetite grade (P < 0.001), and caloric intake (-107 compared with +645.6 calories/d; P = 0.001).
                In patients with AIDS-related weight loss, megestrol acetate can stimulate appetite, food intake, and statistically significant weight gain that is associated with a patient-reported improvement in an overall sense of well-being. A placebo-controlled, randomized trial assessed the activity, tolerance, and degree of weight gain and anorexia of two doses of megestrol acetate in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia. Patients received either low-dose (480 mg/day) or high-dose (960 mg/day) megestrol acetate or placebo for 8 weeks. As of March 1991, 91 patients had been randomized; 65 patients were evaluable. Median initial weight loss in all patients ranged from 13 to 16%. Further weight loss was seen in 13 of 17 patients in the placebo group, compared with 10 of 27 and 6 of 21 in the low- and high-dose megestrol acetate groups, respectively. Eight of 27 patients in the low-dose-group and 9 of 21 in the high-dose group gained weight, with a median of 3 and 4 kg, respectively. Beneficial effects of megestrol acetate were seen in 63 and 71% of the low- and high-dose groups, respectively, compared with 24% of the placebo group. Side effects of megestrol acetate were mild. No correlation between megestrol acetate dosage and weight gain was found, but there was a tendency for increased weight in more patients taking high-dose megestrol acetate. This randomized, controlled trial assessed the activity, tolerance, and degree of weight gain and anorexia of two doses of megestrol acetate in patients with advanced cancer and cachexia. Patients received either 480 mg/d or 960 mg/d megestrol acetate or placebo for 8 weeks. As of June 1990, 55 patients had been randomized; 16 died during the 8-week study, and it was too early to evaluate another 5 patients. The remaining 34 patients were included in analyses. The median initial weight loss ranged from 15% to 22% of usual body weight, which shows the severe degree of malnutrition. Further weight loss was seen in 6 of 8 patients in the placebo group compared with only 5 of 15 and 3 of 11 patients in the low-dose and high-dose megestrol acetate groups, respectively. The median further weight loss was comparable in all groups. Six of 15 and 6 of 11 patients in the low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively, gained weight with a median of 3 kg and 4 kg, respectively. A trend showed beneficial effects of megestrol acetate. Appetite improvement was similar in all groups. Due to the small sample size, however, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups. Side effects of megestrol acetate were mild. In a subgroup of 15 patients, measurement of body water content indicated a decrease of body fat after 8 weeks in the placebo and low-dose groups. Only the high-dose megestrol acetate group showed an increase in both fat and lean body mass, suggesting a positive effect. Malnutrition is a negative prognostic indicator in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and may accentuate pulmonary decline. We tested whether megestrol acetate would have beneficial effects on growth in patients with CF and pancreatic insufficiency.
                We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study. All patients were taking replacement enzymes to compensate for pancreatic insufficiency. Patients (n = 17) were randomly assigned to receive either megestrol acetate or placebo.
                The treatment group had a significant increase in weight-for-age z scores compared with placebo and reached 100% of their ideal body weight within 3 months of initiating therapy. Weight gain included both fat and fat-free mass. Improved pulmonary function (forced vital capacity and forced expiratory volume in 1 second) was noted in the treatment group compared with placebo (P <.04). Reversible adrenal suppression was observed in the majority of patients who received megestrol acetate.
                Short-term use of megestrol acetate results in significant weight gain and improved pulmonary function in malnourished subjects with CF. Our study provides a controlled basis for this intervention, identifies important side effects, and provides the foundation for multiyear, longitudinal trials in a larger number of patients with CF.
This review shows that MA improves appetite and is associated with slight weight gain in cancer, AIDS and in patients with other underlying pathology. Despite the fact that these patients are receiving palliative care they should be informed of the risks involved in taking MA.