Randomised comparative trial of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. The effects of mefenamic acid and norethisterone on measured menstrual blood loss. A comparative study of danazol and norethisterone in dysfunctional uterine bleeding presenting as menorrhagia. Comparative study of tranexamic acid and norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia. The effects of danazol, mefenamic acid, norethisterone and a progesterone-impregnated coil on endometrial prostaglandin concentrations in women with menorrhagia. A comparative study of danazol, a regimen of decreasing doses of danazol, and norethindrone in the treatment of objectively proven unexplained menorrhagia.
To compare the efficacy and acceptability of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and norethisterone for the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia.
                A randomised comparative parallel group study.
                Gynaecology outpatient clinic in a teaching hospital.
                Forty-four women with heavy regular periods and a measured menstrual blood loss exceeding 80 ml.
                Twenty-two women had a levonorgestrel intrauterine system inserted within the first seven days of menses, and 22 women received norethisterone (5 mg three times daily) from day 5 to day 26 of the cycle for three cycles.
                The main outcome measure was the change in objectively assessed menstrual blood loss after three months of treatment.
                When menstrual blood loss at three months was expressed as a percentage of the control, the levonorgestrel intrauterine system reduced menstrual blood loss by 94% (median reduction 103 ml; range 70 to 733 ml), and oral norethisterone by 87% (median reduction 95 ml; range 56 to 212 ml). After three cycles of treatment 76% of the women in the levonorgestrel intrauterine system group wished to continue with the treatment, compared with only 22% of the norethisterone group.
                Both the levonorgestrel intrauterine system and oral norethisterone in this regimen provided an effective treatment for menorrhagia in terms of reducing menstrual blood loss to within normal limits. The levonorgestrel intrauterine system was associated with higher rates of satisfaction and continuation with treatment, and thus offers an effective alternative to currently available medical and surgical treatments for menorrhagia. Although there are numerous medical treatments for menorrhagia, in many instances neither the precise diagnosis nor the response to therapy have been assessed objectively. Menorrhagia (menstrual blood loss more than 80 mL per cycle) was diagnosed objectively in 32 (44%) of 72 women with a subjective complaint of heavy menses. All of the 32 women had ovulatory cycles. After random allocation to treatment with either mefenamic acid (500 mg three times daily during menses, N = 17) or norethisterone (5 mg twice daily on days 19-26 of the cycle, N = 15) for two additional cycles, the median menstrual blood loss was reduced from 123 mL (range 86-237) to 81 mL (22-193) (P less than .001) and from 109 mL (81-236) to 92 mL (43-189) (P less than .002) with mefenamic acid and norethisterone, respectively. Apart from a decrease in the median number of days of bleeding, from 7 (5-8) to 5 (3-8) in those women treated with mefenamic acid, no other differences were seen between the groups. We conclude that mefenamic acid and norethisterone were similarly effective in reducing the degree of menstrual blood loss in women with proved menorrhagia, but that 52 and 67% of the women, respectively, remained menorrhagic after 2 months of treatment. This randomized open study compared the efficacy and safety of norethisterone, 5 mg three times a day from day 19 to 26, and danazol, 200 mg daily, in the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding presenting as menorrhagia. Clinical criteria were employed to confirm the diagnosis, and subjective assessment of the condition was performed during one pre-treatment and three treatment cycles. Fourteen patients commenced norethisterone and 10 danazol. Bleeding intensity scores were significantly lower with danazol than with norethisterone, and patients assessed their blood loss to be significantly less with danazol than with norethisterone. Associated symptoms of backache and abdominal pain were improved to a similar degree by both treatments. Adverse reactions were reported with similar frequency and were of a similar nature in both treatment groups. To compare the efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid and norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia.
                A randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled study.
                University Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge.
                One hundred and three women complaining of heavy periods with a regular cycle recruited directly from general practitioners within the hospital catchment area and from consultants' gynaecology clinics.
                There were forty-six women on placebo with confirmed ovulatory menorrhagia, defined as menstrual blood loss greater than 80 ml/cycle and mid-luteal serum progesterone concentration greater than 9 nmol/l). Twenty-one received norethisterone (5 mg twice a day on days 19 and 26) and 25 received tranexamic acid (1 g four times daily on days 1 to 4) for two cycles.
                Menstrual blood loss was measured using the alkaline haematin method. Haematological assessments were made both at the beginning and at the end of the study, questionnaires were given to assess subjective endpoints, and patients were asked to report any adverse events during all cycles.
                Tranexamic acid reduced mean menstrual blood loss by 45%, from 175 ml to 97 ml (95% CI for the difference in menstrual blood loss 52 to 108, P < 0.0001), norethisterone increased mean blood loss by 20% from 173 ml to 208 ml (95% CI for the difference in menstrual blood loss -64 to 2, P = 0.26). Fourteen (56%) women who received tranexamic acid achieved a mean menstrual loss of less than 80 ml per cycle during treatment, but only two (9.5%) who received norethisterone achieved this mean menstrual loss. There were no serious adverse events reported for either drug.
                Tranexamic acid is a safe and effective form of medical therapy in women with menorrhagia and is highly likely to normalise blood loss in women losing 80 to 200 ml prior to treatment. Norethisterone at this dose is not effective therapy for ovulatory menorrhagia. The effects of four medical treatments have been assessed on menstrual blood loss (MBL) and endometrial prostaglandin (PG) concentrations in 30 women with objectively confirmed menorrhagia. Patients were randomly treated with danazol, 200 mg daily (n = 6), mefenamic acid, 500 mg three times daily during menses (n = 8), norethisterone, 5 mg twice daily from day 15-25 of the cycle (n = 8) or a progesterone-impregnated coil releasing 65 micrograms progesterone daily (n = 8). Endometrial biopsies were obtained in the mid-luteal phase before and after treatment in 23 cases, and assayed for PG content using radioimmunoassay. Treatment with norethisterone had no effect on either MBL or the concentration of PGs in the endometrium. MBL was significantly reduced after treatment with mefenamic acid (P = 0.05, n = 6) and the progesterone coil (P less than 0.05, n = 6), and was reduced in each of 4 cases treated with danazol in whom endometrial biopsies were available. Although there was no consistent change in endometrial PG concentrations in either the mefenamic acid or danazol groups, the lower MBL after insertion of the progesterone coil was associated with a reduced endometrial content of PGE, PGF2 alpha and "total" PG (6oxo PGF1 alpha + PGE + PGF2 alpha)-P = 0.05. Whereas the cyclooxygenase inhibitor mefenamic acid is likely to exert its effect on endometrial PGs at the time of menstruation itself, the continuous administration of progesterone throughout the menstrual cycle could result in both an impairment in estrogen receptor generation leading to reduced estrogen-mediated cyclooxygenase activity, and an increase in endometrial PG metabolism. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy of the recommended dose of danazol, a reduced-dose danazol regimen, and norethindrone in the treatment of objectively proven menorrhagia. Recurrence after discontinuing treatment was also assessed.
                The study was a single-blind, randomized, parallel, comparative study. After a placebo run-in period over two menstrual cycles, 57 patients with a baseline mean menstrual blood loss of at least 80 ml per cycle were randomly assigned to receive one of three therapies: danazol, 200 mg/day (n = 19) for three menstrual cycles; danazol, 200 mg/day for one cycle, 100 mg/day for one cycle, and 50 mg/day for one cycle (n = 19); and norethindrone, 5 mg three times daily on days 19 through 26 of the cycle for three consecutive cycles (n = 19). Patients in whom treatment was successful (those experiencing blood loss < 80 ml) were entered in the follow-up phase of the study, receiving placebo for a maximum of four menstrual cycles.
                The final menstrual blood loss on treatment was significantly less for those patients who received both danazol regimens compared with those who received norethindrone (p = 0.017 for reducing dose danazol vs norethindrone and p = 0.043 for 200 mg of danazol vs norethindrone). Both danazol treatment regimens were significantly more successful in reducing menstrual blood loss to within the normal range than was norethindrone. The reducing-dose danazol regimen was successful in eight of 17 patients (p = 0.027), and 200 mg of danazol was successful in nine of 19 patients (p = 0.029), compared with the two successes of 18 patients treated with norethindrone. Significantly more recipients of 200 mg of danazol than of norethindrone subjectively rated their treatment to be moderately or highly effective (p = 0.033). Both danazol treatment regimens were associated with a higher incidence of adverse events than was norethindrone therapy, although the number of withdrawals were similar and infrequent in the three groups.
                Both danazol regimens were significantly more effective than norethindrone in reducing the excessive menstrual blood loss of women with unexplained menorrhagia. A subjective assessment by patients found that only the 200 mg of danazol was judged to be significantly more effective than norethindrone in controlling the heaviness of menstrual bleeding. The reduced-dose danazol regimen did not appear to markedly diminish the incidence of adverse events compared with the 200 mg of danazol regimen.
Progestogens administered from day 15 or 19 to day 26 of the cycle offer no advantage over other medical therapies such as danazol, tranexamic acid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the IUS in the treatment of menorrhagia in women with ovulatory cycles. Progestogen therapy for 21 days of the cycle results in a significant reduction in menstrual blood loss, although women found the treatment less acceptable than intrauterine levonorgestrel. This regimen of progestogen may have a role in the short-term treatment of menorrhagia.