Mechanism of metformin action in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Metformin-induced changes in serum lipids, lipoproteins, and apoproteins in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Antihyperglycemic treatment in diabetics with coronary disease: increased metformin-associated mortality over a 5-year follow-up. Association of lactic acidosis with biguanide therapy. Metabonomic variations in the drug-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients and healthy volunteers. Comparison of extended-release metformin in combination with a sulfonylurea (glyburide) to sulfonylurea monotherapy in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, phase III study. A retrospective chart review of uncontrolled use of metformin as an add-on therapy in type 2 diabetes. The impact of metformin therapy on hepatic glucose production and skeletal muscle glycogen synthase activity in overweight type II diabetic patients. Prospective randomized two-years clinical study comparing additional metformin treatment with reducing diet in type 2 diabetes. Metformin reduces systemic methylglyoxal levels in type 2 diabetes. Multicenter, randomized, double-masked, parallel-group assessment of simultaneous glipizide/metformin as second-line pharmacologic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is inadequately controlled by a sulfonylurea. Influence of phenformin and metformin on exercise induced lactataemia in patients with diabetes mellitus. The effect of metformin treatment on VEGF and PAI-1 levels in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Efficacy and safety of acarbose in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Changes in insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity associated with metformin treatment of type 2 diabetes. A comparison of mealtime insulin aspart and human insulin in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes patients. Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on NEFA-induced insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. [Evaluation of acarbose efficacy and safety for treatment of diabetes mellitus. Testing of observations under general health care conditions]. Clinical experience with acarbose: results of a Canadian multicentre study. Effects of melatonin and zinc on glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with metformin. A comparison of treatment with metformin and gliclazide in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Comparative effects of phenformin, metformin and glibenclamide on metabolic rhythms in maturity-onset diabetics. Metformin increases insulin sensitivity and basal glucose clearance in type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. [Effectiveness of treatment with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled with insulin treatment]. Utility of metformin as a non-hormonal agent in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Induction of long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients using pioglitazone and metformin combination. One year comparative trial of metformin and glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide: comparison of the addition of either metformin or bed-time NPH insulin to glyburide. One-year acarbose treatment raises fasting serum acetate in diabetic patients. Comparative three-month study of the efficacies of metformin and gliclazide in the treatment of NIDD. Glyburide/metformin combination product is safe and efficacious in patients with type 2 diabetes failing sulphonylurea therapy. Metformin for obese, insulin-treated diabetic patients: improvement in glycaemic control and reduction of metabolic risk factors. Folate administration reduces circulating homocysteine levels in NIDDM patients on long-term metformin treatment. Metformin efficacy and tolerance in obese non-insulin dependent diabetics: a comparison of two dosage schedules. Comparison of fixed-dose rosiglitazone/metformin combination therapy with sulphonylurea plus metformin in overweight individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin alone. Effect on glycemic control of the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin in patients with T2DM. Monitoring of metabolic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus on oral hypoglycaemic agents: value of evening blood glucose determination. Metabolic effects of metformin on glucose and lactate metabolism in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. [The combination of insulin and metformin in obese patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus]. Metformin and clofibrate in maturity onset diabetes mellitus: advantages of combined treatment. Effects of gliclazide versus metformin on the clinical profile and lipid peroxidation markers in type 2 diabetes. Effects of rosiglitazone on plasma brain natriuretic peptide levels and myocardial performance index in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Efficacy and tolerability of initial combination therapy with nateglinide and metformin in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg in diabetic dyslipidaemia in adult Indian patients. [Median-term (4 months) treatment with glibenclamide + metformin substituting for glibenclamide + fenformin lowers the lacticemia levels in type-2 diabetics (NIDDM)]. Metformin, but not pioglitazone, decreases postchallenge plasma ghrelin levels in type 2 diabetic patients: a possible role in weight stability? Effects of metformin on fibrinogen levels in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Efficacy and metabolic effects of metformin and troglitazone in type II diabetes mellitus. Metformin decreases food consumption and induces weight loss in subjects with obesity with type II non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Effect of metformin on intact proinsulin and des 31,32 proinsulin concentrations in subjects with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus. Metformin causes a reduction in basal and post-venous occlusion plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in type 2 diabetic patients. [Effect of insulin plus rosiglitazone or metformin on serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized-controlled study]. Effect of metformin on insulin-stimulated glucose turnover and insulin binding to receptors in type II diabetes. Results of a placebo-controlled study of the metabolic effects of the addition of metformin to sulfonylurea-treated patients. Evidence for a central role of adipose tissue. Further evidence for a central role of adipose tissue in the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin. Liraglutide vs insulin glargine and placebo in combination with metformin and sulfonylurea therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEAD-5 met+SU): a randomised controlled trial. Metformin's effects on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas. Comparison of tolbutamide and metformin in elderly diabetic patients. Comparative efficacy of glimepiride and/or metformin with insulin in type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone vs glimepiride: Differential effects on vascular endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Long-term effects of exenatide therapy over 82 weeks on glycaemic control and weight in over-weight metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mechanism of metformin action in obese and lean noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects. Efficacy of metformin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Multicenter Metformin Study Group. The effects of pioglitazone and metformin on plasma visfatin levels in patients with treatment naive type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparative outcomes study of metformin intervention versus conventional approach the COSMIC Approach Study. Nateglinide or gliclazide in combination with metformin for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on maximum doses of metformin alone: 1-year trial results. Effects of initiating insulin and metformin on glycemic control and inflammatory biomarkers among patients with type 2 diabetes: the LANCET randomized trial. Long-term effects of metformin on metabolism and microvascular and macrovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Efficacy and safety of therapy with metformin plus pioglitazone in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Acarbose for the treatment of type II diabetes: the results of a Canadian multi-centre trial. A randomized controlled trial examining combinations of repaglinide, metformin and NPH insulin. Long-term effect of glimepiride and rosiglitazone on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors in metformin-treated patients affected by metabolic syndrome: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Metformin-induced lacticacidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Effects of nateglinide and glibenclamide on prothrombotic factors in naïve type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a 1-year, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Rosiglitazone therapy improves insulin resistance parameters in overweight and obese diabetic patients intolerant to metformin. Addition of biphasic insulin aspart 30 to optimized metformin and pioglitazone treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: The ACTION Study (Achieving Control Through Insulin plus Oral ageNts). Serum transforming growth factor-beta 1 levels in normoalbuminuric and normotensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone. Metabolic and haemodynamic effects of metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Efficacy and safety of topiramate in combination with metformin in the treatment of obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. [Treatment of diabetes by NN-dimethyl biguanide]. Effect of homocysteine-lowering therapy on arterial elasticity and metabolic parameters in metformin-treated diabetic patients. A randomized trial of the effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on inflammation and subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. [N, N-dimethyl-biguanide (D.M.G.G.) in the treatment of diabetes mellitus]. Antihyperglycaemic efficacy, response prediction and dose-response relations of treatment with metformin and sulphonylurea, alone and in primary combination. Favorable effects of pioglitazone and metformin compared with gliclazide on lipoprotein subfractions in overweight patients with early type 2 diabetes. Metabolic effects of metformin addition to chronic glibenclamide treatment in type 2 diabetes. Metabolic control in diabetic subjects in three Swedish areas with high, medium, and low sales of antidiabetic drugs. Metformin as secondary therapy in a defined population with type 2 diabetes. Safety and efficacy of repaglinide in combination with metformin and bedtime NPH insulin as an insulin treatment regimen in type 2 diabetes. Blood pressure and cardiac autonomic nervous system in obese type 2 diabetic patients: effect of metformin administration. Low dose metformin in the treatment of type II non-insulin-dependent diabetes: clinical and metabolic evaluations. Pioglitazone improves cardiac function and alters myocardial substrate metabolism without affecting cardiac triglyceride accumulation and high-energy phosphate metabolism in patients with well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Metformin improves peripheral but not hepatic insulin action in obese patients with type II diabetes. Combination treatment with metformin and glibenclamide versus single-drug therapies in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, comparative study. Improved endothelial function with metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. [Chlorpropamide-dimethylbiguanide combination in the control of diabetes mellitus with complications]. Impaired beta-cell responses improve when fasting blood glucose concentration is reduced in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: reconsideration of traditional contraindications. Obese patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by insulin and metformin: effects of adjunctive dexfenfluramine therapy on glycaemic control. The effects of dexfenfluramine on blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Changes in liver tests during 1-year treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes with pioglitazone, metformin or gliclazide. Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the SWITCH Pilot Study. The effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on the plasma concentrations of resistin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Long-term effects on lipids and lipoproteins of pioglitazone versus gliclazide addition to metformin and pioglitazone versus metformin addition to sulphonylurea in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. PRESERVE-beta: two-year efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide or glyburide plus metformin. Rosiglitazone produces a greater reduction in circulating platelet activity compared with gliclazide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus--an effect probably mediated by direct platelet PPARgamma activation. Metformin reduces C-reactive protein but not complement factor C3 in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Different effects of insulin and oral antidiabetic agents on glucose and energy metabolism in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Rosiglitazone treatment increases subcutaneous adipose tissue glucose uptake in parallel with perfusion in patients with type 2 diabetes: a double-blind, randomized study with metformin. Triple therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine or rosiglitazone added to combination therapy of sulfonylurea plus metformin in insulin-naive patients. Acarbose in NIDDM patients with poor control on conventional oral agents. A 24-week placebo-controlled study. [EXPERIENCE WITH THE BIGUANIDE "GLUCOPHAGE"]. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin when added to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Improved glycaemic control with metformin-glibenclamide combined tablet therapy (Glucovance) in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled on metformin. Insulin, glibenclamide or metformin treatment for non insulin dependent diabetes: heterogenous responses of standard measures of insulin action and insulin secretion before and after differing hypoglycaemic therapy. Saxagliptin given in combination with metformin as initial therapy improves glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with either monotherapy: a randomized controlled trial. Metformin improves atypical protein kinase C activation by insulin and phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-(PO4)3 in muscle of diabetic subjects. Comparison between acarbose, metformin, and insulin treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with secondary failure to sulfonylurea treatment. METFORMIN COMBINED WITH CHLORPROPAMIDE IN THE TREATMENT OF DIABETES MELLITUS. Adding metformin versus insulin dose increase in insulin-treated but poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus: an open-label randomized trial. [Gliclazide and metformin combination in patients with type 2 diabetes. Preliminary data]. Effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on inflammatory markers and adipokines: decrease in interleukin-18 is an independent factor for the improvement of homeostasis model assessment-beta in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin monotherapy during 2-year treatment of drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes: comparison with metformin. [Comparison of two treatment models in type-II diabetic patients with poor metabolic control: Preformed combination of glibenclamide 2,5 mg + metformin 400 mg or mono-therapy with sulfonylurea at maximal doses? An evaluation at six months]. The synergistic effect of miglitol plus metformin combination therapy in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Both slow-release and regular-form metformin improve glycemic control without altering plasma visfatin level in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone reduces monocyte activation in type 2 diabetes. Addition of benfluorex to biguanide improves glycemic control in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetes: a double-blind study versus placebo. [Chlorpropamide-metformin in obese diabetics or diabetics with side effects from sulfonylureas. 2-year results]. Mechanism by which metformin reduces glucose production in type 2 diabetes. Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on plasma adiponectin in newly detected type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparison of bedtime NPH insulin or metformin combined with glibenclamide in secondary sulphonylurea failure in obese type II (NIDDM) patients. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of a novel once-daily extended-release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Comparison of metformin and chlorpropamide in non-obese, maturity-onset diabetics uncontrolled by diet. The effect of metformin on leptin in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. The effect of the ingestion of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) on the pharmacokinetics of metformin in non-diabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects--a double blind placebo-controlled, crossover study. Effects of metformin on glucose, insulin and lipid metabolism in patients with mild hypertriglyceridaemia and non-insulin dependent diabetes by glucose tolerance test criteria. Effect of metformin on glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes in daily practice: a retrospective study. Different effect of acute and chronic oral metformin administration on glucose and insulin response to bread and to pasta in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor PHX1149 improves blood glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Effects of rosiglitazone on fasting plasma fibroblast growth factor-21 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The effects of metformin on adipocyte insulin action and metabolic control in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes. The mushroom Agaricus Blazei Murill in combination with metformin and gliclazide improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled clinical trial. Efficacy of once- or twice-daily extended release metformin compared with thrice-daily immediate release metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Effects of metformin on the glycemic control, lipid profile, and arterial blood pressure of type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome already on insulin. [Experience with dimethylbiguanid in late failures of the oral diabetes treatment]. Effect of metformin and rosiglitazone combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial. The influence of dimethylbiguanide on phenprocoumon elimination and its mode of action. A drug interaction study. Vildagliptin plus metformin combination therapy provides superior glycaemic control to individual monotherapy in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Combination daytime chlorpropamide-metformin/bedtime insulin in the treatment of secondary failures in non insulin dependent diabetes. Triple therapy with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled by metformin and a thiazolidinedione: results of a 30-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. [Long range results (5 years) in the treatment of stable diabetes with low doses of clorpropamide-metformin (author's transl)]. Effect of metformin in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Metformin improves hemodynamic and rheological responses to L-arginine in NIDDM patients. Efficacy of 24-week monotherapy with acarbose, metformin, or placebo in dietary-treated NIDDM patients: the Essen-II Study. Dimethyldiguanide in diabetes mellitus; report of a small trial. Therapeutic effect of glibenclamide in a fixed combination with metformin or phenformin in NIDDM patients. Effects of metformin treatment on whole-body and splanchnic amino acid turnover in mild type 2 diabetes. Targeting hyperglycaemia with either metformin or repaglinide in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a randomized crossover trial. Effect of insulin-metformin combination on hepatic steatosis in patients with type 2 diabetes. Impact of metformin versus repaglinide on non-glycaemic cardiovascular risk markers related to inflammation and endothelial dysfunction in non-obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Comparison of combined therapies in treatment of secondary failure to glyburide. Relationship between plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 plasma levels and the lipoprotein(a) concentrations in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Efficacy of combined treatments in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas. Is it predictable? A double-blind randomized study comparing the effects of continuing or not continuing rosiglitazone + metformin therapy when starting insulin therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes. Selective regulation of cellular and secreted multimeric adiponectin by antidiabetic therapies in humans. Pioglitazone treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus when combined with portion control diet modifies the metabolic syndrome. Irreversibility of the defect in glycogen synthase activity in skeletal muscle from obese patients with NIDDM treated with diet and metformin. Sulphonylurea failure in type 2 diabetes: treatment with a basal insulin supplement. Comparison of glargine insulin versus rosiglitazone addition in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients on metformin plus sulfonylurea. A randomized study of orlistat in combination with a weight management programme in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with metformin. Metformin-pioglitazone and metformin-rosiglitazone effects on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors plasma level in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome. [The effect of metformin on fasting and postprandial insulin secretion in obese patients with diabetes mellitus type 2]. [Body mass index, blood lactate and therapeutic effectiveness of metformin in type II diabetes mellitus]. Free fatty acid kinetics during long-term treatment with pioglitazone added to sulfonylurea or metformin in Type 2 diabetes. Recognition of fasting or overall hyperglycaemia when starting insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice. Long-term effects of pioglitazone and metformin on insulin sensitivity in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparison between vildagliptin and metformin to sustain reductions in HbA(1c) over 1 year in drug-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes. The metabolic effects of once daily extended-release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre study. Efficacy and safety of exenatide in patients of Asian descent with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin or metformin and a sulphonylurea. Effect of metformin therapy on plasma adiponectin and leptin levels in obese and insulin resistant postmenopausal females with type 2 diabetes. Effect of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, and metformin on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. [Long-term (3 year) results of the treatment of stable diabetes with low doses of chlopropamide-metformin]. Metformin plus low-dose glimeperide significantly improves Homeostasis Model Assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)) and beta-cell function (HOMA(beta-cell)) without hyperinsulinemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparison of vildagliptin and metformin monotherapy in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a 24-week, double-blind, randomized trial. Effect of glycaemic control, metformin and gliclazide on platelet density and aggregability in recently diagnosed type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Effects of metformin in patients with poorly controlled, insulin-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Biphasic insulin aspart 30 plus metformin: an effective combination in type 2 diabetes. The effect of metformin on glycemic control, serum lipids and lipoproteins in diet alone and sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic patients with sub-optimal metabolic control. Effect of pioglitazone compared with metformin on glycemic control and indicators of insulin sensitivity in recently diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. [Treatment of obese diabetic patients using glucophage retard]. A comparison of metformin versus guar in combination with sulphonylureas in the treatment of non insulin dependent diabetes. A comparison of phenformin and metformin in the treatment of maturity onset diabetes. Beneficial effects of rosiglitazone on novel cardiovascular risk factors in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Long-term therapy with addition of pioglitazone to metformin compared with the addition of gliclazide to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, comparative study. The effects of metformin and diet on plasma testosterone and leptin levels in obese men. The effect of glibenclamide and metformin on serum lipoproteins in type 2 diabetes. The reduction of low density lipoprotein cholesterol by metformin is maintained with long-term therapy. Metformin-glibenclamide versus metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. A comparison of troglitazone and metformin on insulin requirements in euglycemic intensively insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. Improved glycaemic control with miglitol in inadequately-controlled type 2 diabetics. The effects of metformin on glycemic control and serum lipids in insulin-treated NIDDM patients with suboptimal metabolic control. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) as surrogate insulinization criteria in patients with type 2 diabetes. Efficacy and safety of the human glucagon-like peptide-1 analog liraglutide in combination with metformin and thiazolidinedione in patients with type 2 diabetes (LEAD-4 Met+TZD). Monotherapy with metformin: does it improve hypoxia in type 2 diabetic patients? Effects of rosiglitazone added to submaximal doses of metformin compared with dose escalation of metformin in type 2 diabetes: the EMPIRE Study. Comparison of the effects of pioglitazone and metformin on insulin resistance and hormonal markers in patients with impaired glucose tolerance and early diabetes. Glimepiride versus metformin as monotherapy in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, single-blind comparative study. Effect of metformin plus roziglitazone compared with metformin alone on glycaemic control in well-controlled Type 2 diabetes. Effect of repaglinide addition to metformin monotherapy on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. [A new oral antidiabetic: N,N-dimethylbiguanide. Therapeutic trials alternated with a placebo and a sulfonamide]. Therapeutic comparison of metformin and sulfonylurea, alone and in various combinations. A double-blind controlled study. The hyperlactatemic effect of biguanides: a comparison between phenformin and metformin during a 6-month treatment. Type 2 diabetes in the elderly: an assessment of metformin (metformin in the elderly). Effects of early use of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group. A prospective study of the effect of 12 months treatment on serum lipids and apolipoproteins A-I and B in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. The effect of a thiazolidinedione drug, troglitazone, on glycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled with sulfonylurea and metformin. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The effects of high- and medium-dose metformin therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type II diabetes. Oral antidiabetic combination therapy with sulphonylureas and metformin. Therapy focused on lowering postprandial glucose, not fasting glucose, may be superior for lowering HbA1c. IOEZ Study Group. Metformin reduces circulating factor VII concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JACKSON WP: Dimethyldiguanide ('Glucophage', LA 6023) in diabetes mellitus. Combined metformin and insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized double-blind trial of acarbose in type 2 diabetes shows improved glycemic control over 3 years (U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study 44) Effect of combination glipizide GITS/metformin on fibrinolytic and metabolic parameters in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic subjects. Effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) combined with sulfonylurea or sulfonylurea and metformin in treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Comparison of metabolic effects of pioglitazone, metformin, and glimepiride over 1 year in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. Metabolic and hemodynamic effects of metformin and glibenclamide in normotensive NIDDM patients. Regulation of glucose transport and insulin signaling by troglitazone or metformin in adipose tissue of type 2 diabetic subjects. Effects of pretreatment with low-dose metformin on metabolic parameters and weight gain by pioglitazone in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Sodium-glucose cotransport inhibition with dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetes. A comparison of preconstituted, fixed combinations of low-dose glyburide plus metformin versus high-dose glyburide alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. Metformin and lipoprotein(a) levels. [Therapy of diabetes mellitus using metformin. Clinical study on 60 patients]. Efficacy of metformin in type II diabetes: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-response trial. Combined metformin-sulfonylurea treatment of patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes in fair to poor glycemic control. Effects of pioglitazone and metformin on intracellular lipid content in liver and skeletal muscle of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Comparison of chlorpropamide and metformin treatment on weight and blood-glucose response of uncontrolled obese diabetics. Efficacy and safety of adding the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin to metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Treatment with the human once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 analog taspoglutide in combination with metformin improves glycemic control and lowers body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin alone: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Effect of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, to metformin on 24-h glycaemic control and beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Meformin, plasma glucose and free fatty acids in type II diabetic out-patients: results of a clinical study. Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on markers of endothelial function and inflammatory activity in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nateglinide combination therapy with basal insulin and metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. Ciclazindol: an oral agent with weight reducing properties and hypoglycaemic activity. Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. Exenatide versus insulin glargine in patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Comparison of effect of pioglitazone with metformin or sulfonylurea (monotherapy and combination therapy) on postload glycemia and composite insulin sensitivity index during an oral glucose tolerance test in patients with type 2 diabetes. Comparison of bedtime insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A randomized, controlled trial. Comparison of insulin monotherapy and combination therapy with insulin and metformin or insulin and troglitazone in type 2 diabetes. [Evaluation of the efficacy of metformin-glibenclamide treatment in overweight non-insulin dependent diabetics]. The efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A multicenter controlled clinical trial. Biphasic insulin aspart 30: better glycemic control than with premixed human insulin 30 in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes. Placebo-controlled trial of the effects of guar gum and metformin on fasting blood glucose and serum lipids in obese, type 2 diabetic patients. Plasma t-PA and PAl-1 antigen concentrations in non-insulin dependent diabetic patients: effects of treatment modality on fibrinolysis. Twice-daily dosing of a repaglinide/metformin fixed-dose combination tablet provides glycaemic control comparable to rosiglitazone/metformin tablet. Decreased in vivo oxidative stress and decreased platelet activation following metformin treatment in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects. Improved glycaemic control by addition of glimepiride to metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetic patients. Comparative effects of glibenclamide and metformin on ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular reactivity in NIDDM. Metabolic effects of metformin in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. [Efficacy and safety of glimepiride plus metformin in a single presentation, as combined therapy, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and secondary failure to glibenclamide, as monotherapy]. Intensive insulin therapy combined with metformin in obese type 2 diabetic patients. [Treatment of diabetes mellitus. Statistical data on 1190 cases]. Comparison of acarbose and metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus insufficiently controlled with diet and sulphonylureas: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The short-term effect of a switch from glibenclamide to metformin on blood pressure and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. [Six-month effectiveness and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with sulfonylureas or metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus]. Metformin added to insulin therapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Does metformin decrease blood pressure in patients with Type 2 diabetes intensively treated with insulin? Combination of insulin and metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Effects of short-term treatment with metformin on serum concentrations of homocysteine, folate and vitamin B12 in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Effects of improved glycaemic control on calcium and magnesium homeostasis in type II diabetes. Evaluation of efficacy and safety of fixed dose combination of glimepiride 2 mg pluspioglitazone 15 mg plus metformin SR 500 mg in the management of patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Continuing metformin when starting insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Influence of metformin on arginine-induced glucagon secretion in human diabetes. Glimepiride versus pioglitazone combination therapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: results of a randomized clinical trial. Comparative efficacy of metformin and glibenclamide in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Prospective comparative study in NIDDM patients of metformin and glibenclamide with special reference to lipid profiles. Causes of weight gain during insulin therapy with and without metformin in patients with Type II diabetes mellitus. The difficult choice of treatment for poorly controlled maturity onset diabetes: tablets or insulin? Platelet behaviour in non-insulin-dependent diabetes--influence of vascular complications, treatment and metabolic control. Effect of metformin on postprandial lipemia in patients with fairly to poorly controlled NIDDM. Effect of metformin on serum lipoprotein lipase mass levels and LDL particle size in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. Nateglinide alone and in combination with metformin improves glycemic control by reducing mealtime glucose levels in type 2 diabetes. Effect of metformin on insulin receptor binding and glycaemic control in type II diabetes. Improved meal-related beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity by the dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitor vildagliptin in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes over 1 year. A comparison of acarbose versus metformin as an adjuvant therapy in sulfonylurea-treated NIDDM patients. Troglitazone or metformin in combination with sulfonylureas for patients with type 2 diabetes? Addition of neutral protamine lispro insulin or insulin glargine to oral type 2 diabetes regimens for patients with suboptimal glycemic control: a randomized trial. Rosiglitazone plus metformin is effective and well tolerated in clinical practice: results from large observational studies in people with type 2 diabetes. Effects of basal insulin analog and metformin on glycaemia control and weight as risk factors for endothelial dysfunction. Effect of troglitazone on microalbuminuria in patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy.
The mechanism of action of metformin was studied by comparing glucose turnover before and after a 75-g oral glucose load in 10 nonobese men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) during metformin and placebo therapy by the combined application of the forearm and double-isotope techniques. During the study, 9 of the 10 patients were regularly receiving glibenclamide therapy. In 5 of the men, the first study was performed during metformin therapy, and the second study was done during placebo administration; in the other 5 subjects, the order was reversed. The interval between the studies was at least 3 mo. The metformin dosage was 1 g twice daily in 9 of the patients and 850 mg thrice daily in the 10th subject. In the basal state, metformin administration reduced plasma glucose levels from 172 +/- 14 to 103 +/- 9 mg/dl (P less than .005), hepatic glucose output (HGO) from 2.67 +/- 0.15 to 2.20 +/- 0.20 mg X kg-1 X min-1 (P less than .02), and forearm glucose uptake (FGU) from 0.106 +/- 0.18 to 0.039 +/- 0.016 mg X 100 ml-1 forearm X min-1 (P less than .005), whereas insulin (23 +/- 6 microU/ml) and lactate (1.56 +/- 0.18 mM) levels were unchanged. Although the oral glucose tolerance curve (OGTC) was significantly lowered by metformin, the incremental area under the curve and the insulin response were unchanged. The systemic appearance of ingested glucose was unaffected by metformin; 64 +/- 2% of the load was recovered peripherally in 3 h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Forty patients with NIDDM and hyperlipoproteinemia were selected for a 12-week double-blind placebo-controlled trial to study the effects of metformin on lipoprotein concentration and composition. A significant decrease occurred in VLDL-apo B and all lipid components of VLDL, indicating a decreased number of circulating VLDL, while LDL-apo B was unchanged. Moreover in VLDL the relative TG content increased, the cholesterol content decreased, while in LDL the TG content decreased and the cholesterol content increased, indicating a change in the particle distribution over the spectrum VLDL-IDL-LDL. The initially enhanced TG-content in HDL was reduced. While a reduction in VLDL is observed together with improving glucose control irrespective of the applied method, the observed compositional changes in VLDL and LDL have not been described before and seem to be metformin-specific. Mortality rates are considerably higher in chronic ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) than in those who are nondiabetics. The relationship between different types of antihyperglycemic pharmacological therapy and mortality rate in this NIDDM population is uncertain. We aimed to examine the survival in NIDDM patients with IHD using various types of oral antidiabetic treatments over a 5-year follow-up period. The study sample comprised 11,440 patients with a previous myocardial infarction and/or stable anginal syndrome, aged 45-74 years, who were screened, but not included in the Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention study. Among them, 9,045 were nondiabetics and 2,395 diabetics. The diabetic patients were divided into four groups on the basis of their therapeutic regimen at screening: diet alone (n = 990), sulfonylureas (n = 1,041), metformin (n = 78) and a combination of a sulfonylurea and metformin (n = 266). All NIDDM groups were similar with regard to age, gender, hypertension, smoking, heart failure, angina and prior myocardial infarction. Crude mortality rate was lower in the nondiabetic group (11.21 vs. 21.8%; p < 0.001). In the diabetic group, mortality was 18.5% for patients on diet alone, 22.5% for those on sulfonylureas, 25.6% for patients on metformin, and 31.6% for the combined sulfonylurea/metformin group (p < 0.01). When analyzing age-adjusted mortality rate and actuarial survival curves, the lowest mortality was found in patients on diet alone and the highest in patients on metformin (alone or in combination with sulfonylureas). After adjustment for variables connected with long-term prognosis, the use of metformin was associated with increased relative risk (RR) for all-cause mortality of 1.42 (95% CI 1.10-1.85), whereas the use of sulfonylureas alone was not [RR 1.11 (95% CI 0.90-1.36)]. NIDDM patients with IHD using metformin, alone or in combination with sulfonylureas, exhibited a significantly increased mortality. Until the results of problem-oriented prospective studies on oral control of NIDDM will be available, alternative therapeutic approaches should be investigated in these patients. nan The pathological development and the drug intervention of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) involve altered expression of downstream low molecular weight metabolites including lipids and amino acids, and carbohydrates such as glucose. Currently, a small number of markers used for clinical assessment of T2DM treatment may be insufficient to reflect global variations in pathophysiology. In this study, a metabonomic study was performed to determine metabolic variations associated with T2DM and the drug treatments on 74 patients who were newly diagnosed with T2DM and received a 48 week treatment of a single drug, repaglinide, metformin or rosiglitazone. Fasting overnight and 2 h postprandial blood serum of patients were collected at 24 and 48 weeks to monitor the biochemical indices (FPG, 2hPG, HbA1c, etc.). Gas chromatography/mass spectrometer coupled with multivariate statistical analysis was used to identify the alteration of global serum metabolites associated with T2DM as compared to healthy controls and responses to drug treatment. Significantly altered serum metabolites in diabetic subjects include increased valine, maltose, glutamate, urate, butanoate and long-chain fatty acid (C16:0, C18:1, C18:0, octadecanoate and arachidonate), and decreased glucuronolactone, lysine and lactate. All of the three treatments were able to down-regulate the high level of glutamate to a lower level in serum of T2DM patients, but rosiglitazone treatment was able to reverse more abnormal levels of metabolites, such as valine, lysine, glucuronolactone, C16:0, C18:1, urate, and octadecanoate, suggesting that it is more efficient to alter the metabolism of T2DM patients than the other two drugs. Metformin is widely used in the management of type 2 diabetes, either as monotherapy or in combination with other oral antihyperglycemic agents such as sulfonylureas and thiazolidinediones. Combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea in patients who failed monotherapy has been reported to be effective in maintaining glycemic control.
                The purpose for this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release metformin (MER) administered with a sulfonylurea (glyburide) to sulfonylurea monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study enrolled adult patients with type 2 diabetes who were either drug naive or previously treated with oral diabetic medications and who had not achieved glycemic control. Patients were stabilized on sulfonylurea (10 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 15 mg/d for 4 weeks) then randomly assigned at base line to receive MER (1500 mg QD, 1000 mg BID, or 2000 mg QD) plus sulfonylurea (MER+S) or sulfonylurea monotherapy for 24 weeks. Patients were evaluated every 1 to 2 weeks during sulfonylurea stabilization and initial metformin treatment, and then every 4 weeks until study end. The primary efficacy end point was glycemic control as determined by changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to study end between those receiving combination MER+S treatment and those receiving sulfonylurea monotherapy. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study by direct questioning, self-reporting by patients, and from the results of physical examinations and clinical laboratory tests.
                A total of 741 patients were enrolled. Of these, 134 patients were stabilization failures, 607 patients were randomized, 575 patients received treatment and were included in the intent-to-treat population, and 417 patients completed the study per protocol. There were no significant differences between treatment groups for any demographic or baseline characteristics (all patients: mean [SD] age, 53.0 [10.6] years; male sex, 54.6% [314/575]; race, white, 58.8% [338/575], Hispanic, 28.5% [164/575]; mean [SD] weight, 97.0 [22.2] kg; obese [body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2)], 69.4% [399/575] ). There were significant decreases from baseline in mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels by the end of week 1 and in mean HbA(1c) levels by week 8 in each MER+S group (both, P < 0.001). The mean (95% CI) changes from baseline to study end in the combined MER+S groups (HbA(1c), -0.74% [-0.85% to -0.64%]; FPG, -12.9 [-17.1 to -8.7] mg/dL) were significantly different from the sulfonylurea monotherapy group (HbA(1c), 0.08% [-0.08% to 0.25%]; FPG, 15.5 [8.2 to 22.8] mg/dL; P < 0.001). Among patients treated with MER+S, the mean (SEM) change in HbA(1c) was -1.26% (-1.44% to -1.07%) for drugnaive patients and -0.59% (-0.46% to 0.71%) for patients previously treated with metformin. There was a significant difference between treatment groups with regard to the prevalence of hypoglycemia (MER+S groups, 11.6% vs sulfonylurea monotherapy group, 4.2%; P = 0.007), but no significant difference was observed for gastrointestinal events. The most common gastrointestinal AEs were diarrhea and nausea (8.6% and 3.9%, respectively, in the combined MER+S groups; 2.8% and 1.4%, respectively, in the sulfonylurea monotherapy group).
                The combination of QD or BID treatment with MER+S was significantly more effective in lowering HbA(1c) and glucose levels than sulfonylurea monotherapy in these adult patients with type 2 diabetes. However, a significant increase in the prevalence of hypoglycemia was observed in the MER+S treatment groups compared with the sulfonylurea monotherapy group. The hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and obesity syndrome associated with type 2 diabetes can have debilitating consequences. The biguanide metformin has a mechanism of action that is complementary to those of insulin and the sulfonylureas, suggesting that combination therapy that includes metformin may result in improved glycemic control. The purpose of this retrospective chart review was to determine the effects of adding metformin in an uncontrolled fashion to existing therapy in obese patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycemic control and insulin resistance. For the review, the records of 124 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 71 patients who were taking insulin with or without a sulfonylurea, and group 2 consisted of 53 patients who were taking a sulfonylurea alone. Metformin was added to patients' existing therapy in conjunction with downward titration of the sulfonylurea and insulin doses. A retrospective chart review was conducted at the end of 6 months for group 1 and at the end of 12 months for group 2 to determine the change from baseline in measures of diabetes control (ie, insulin and sulfonylurea dose, glycated hemoglobin [Hb A1c] value, body mass index [BMI], and lipid profiles). In group 1, the mean insulin dose decreased from 46.4 U/d at baseline to 6.1 U/d at the end of follow-up. Eighty-three percent of the patients were able to discontinue insulin therapy completely. Similarly, group 2 had statistically significant reductions in mean sulfonylurea dose. Both groups also achieved statistically significant reductions in Hb A1c, BMI, and total cholesterol level. The addition of metformin to treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas, either alone or in combination, significantly improved glycemic control and cholesterol levels and promoted weight loss in obese type 2 diabetic patients with insulin resistance. Less than 5% of patients reported mild, transient gastrointestinal side effects, none of which required cessation of metformin therapy. Five patients discontinued metformin due to lack of efficacy. The effect of metformin therapy on glucose metabolism was examined in eight overweight newly presenting untreated type II diabetic patients (five males, three females). Patients were treated for 12 weeks with either metformin (850 mg x 3) or matching placebo using a double-blind crossover study design; patients were studied at presentation and at the end of each treatment period. Insulin action was assessed by measuring activation of skeletal muscle glycogen synthase (GS) before and during a 4-hour hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (100 mU.kg-1 x h-1). Metformin therapy was associated with a significant decrease in fasting blood glucose (6.8 +/- 0.6 v 8.3 +/- 0.9 mmol.L-1, P < .01) and glycosylated hemoglobin ([HbA1] 7.7% +/- 0.4% v 8.5% +/- 0.5%, P < .01) levels. Fasting hepatic glucose production (HGP) was also significantly decreased following metformin therapy (1.98 +/- 0.13 v 2.41 +/- 0.20 mg.kg-1 x min-1, P < .02), whereas fasting insulin and C-peptide concentrations remained unaltered. The decrease in basal HGP correlated closely with the decrease in fasting blood glucose concentration (r = .92, P < .001). Insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was assessed using the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp technique and was increased post-metformin (3.8 +/- 0.6 v 3.1 +/- 0.7 mg.kg-1 x min-1, P < .05). This was primarily the result of increased nonoxidative glucose metabolism (1.1 +/- 0.6 v 0.4 +/- 0.6 mg.kg-1 x min-1, P < .05); oxidative glucose metabolism did not change. Metformin had no measurable effect on insulin activation of skeletal muscle GS, the rate-limiting enzyme controlling muscle glucose storage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) After a 2 weeks hospital treatment with a strong dietary regime 100 patients not sufficiently controlled (blood glucose fasting 120-180, pp 180-250 mg/100 ml), were randomly allocated to a purely dietary therapy or to a diet-metformin-combination for a duration of 2 years. After 1 and 2 years the patients were rehospitalized for an accurate evaluation. Additionally, HbA1 was controlled every 3 months, in case of problems after shorter periods. If HbA1 exceeded 10% for more than 4 weeks the patients were hospitalized for 5 days in order to decide whether the deterioration of metabolic control was due to the patients' non-compliance to treatment or to treatment failure. During 2 years of observation 30 patients were withdrawn from the treatment for external reasons. 13 patients (6 diet, 7 metformin + diet) were non-compliant with diet, 3 further patients were not metformin-compliant. Therapeutic failures were confirmed in 4 diet patients, none of the metformin + diet patients failed to respond to treatment. After excluding all these patients there was a group of 29 diet and 25 metformin + diet patients with a similar development of criteria of metabolic control during 2 years. Lipid levels deteriorated in the dietary group more noticeably than during additional metformin treatment although without reaching a statistically significant level, though. The stimulated C-peptide was significantly reduced by metformin in comparison to diet only, which supports former findings of an insulin-lowering effect of the drug. Methylglyoxal (MG) is a reactive alpha-dicarbonyl that is thought to contribute to diabetic complications either as a direct toxin or as a precursor for advanced glycation end products. It is produced primarily from triose phosphates and is detoxified to D-lactate (DL) by the glyoxalase pathway. Because guanidino compounds can block dicarbonyl groups, we have investigated the effects of the diamino biguanide compound metformin and of hyperglycemia on MG and its detoxification products in type 2 diabetes. MG and DL were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography in plasma from 57 subjects with type 2 diabetes. Of these subjects, 27 were treated with diet, sulfonylureas, or insulin (nonmetformin), and 30 were treated with metformin; 28 normal control subjects were also studied. Glycemic control was determined by HbA1c. MG was significantly elevated in diabetic subjects versus the normal control subjects (189.3 +/- 38.7 vs. 123.0 +/- 37 nmol/l, P = 0.0001). MG levels were significantly reduced by high-dosage (1,500-2,500 mg/day) metformin (158.4 +/- 44.2 nmol/l) compared with nonmetformin (189.3 +/- 38.7 nmol/l, P = 0.03) or low-dosage (< or = 1,000 mg/day) metformin (210.98 +/- 51.0 nmol/l, P = 0.001), even though the groups had similar glycemic control. Conversely, DL levels were significantly elevated in both the low- and high-dosage metformin groups relative to the nonmetformin group (13.8 +/- 7.7 and 13.4 +/- 4.6 vs. 10.4 +/- 3.9 micromol/l, P = 0.03 and 0.06, respectively). MG correlated with rising HbA1c levels (R = 0.4, P = 0.03, slope = 13.2) in the nonmetformin subjects but showed no increase with worsening glycemic control in the high-dosage metformin group (R = 0.0004, P = 0.99, slope = 0.02). In conclusion, MG is elevated in diabetes and relates to glycemic control. Metformin reduces MG in a dose-dependent fashion and minimizes the effect of worsening glycemic control on MG levels. To the extent that elevated MG levels lead to their development, metformin treatment may protect against diabetic complications by mechanisms independent of its antihyperglycemic effect. Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with inadequate long-term blood glucose control with sulfonylurea or metformin monotherapy require additional treatment. The synergistic effects of combining glipizide with metformin on glucose control may be realized by treating the primary effects of type 2 DM, impaired insulin secretion, and insulin resistance.
                This study assessed therapy with glipizide/metformin combination tablets in patients with type 2 DM that is uncontrolled by at least half the maximum labeled daily dose of a sulfonylurea.
                In this multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, active-controlled study, patients were randomized to receive glipizide 30-mg, metformin 500-mg, or glipizide/metformin 5/500 mg tablets for 18 weeks (metformin and glipizide/metformin doses were titrated to achieve blood glucose control). Maximum total daily doses were glipizide 30 mg, metformin 2000 mg, and glipizide/ metformin 20/2000 mg.
                A total of 247 patients were included in the study. The mean (SD) age was 56.2 (10.1) years; 61.5% of patients were male; 70.0% were white, 15.8% were Hispanic/Latino, 13.0% were black, and 1.2% were Asian/Pacific Islanders. Patients were, on average, obese (mean [SD] body mass index, 31.3 [4.7] kg/m2), had moderate to severe hyperglycemia (mean [SD] glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c], 8.7% [1.1]), and had a mean (SD) DM duration of 6.5 (4.9) years. Glipizide/ metformin tablets controlled the HbA1c level more effectively than did either glipizide or metformin monotherapies (mean treatment differences, in favor of glipizide/ metformin, of -1.06% and -0.98%, respectively, P < 0.001). At study end, an HbA1c level < 7.0% was achieved in approximately 4-fold more patients who were treated with glipizide/metformin (36.3%) compared with glipizide (8.9%) or metformin (9.9%) monotherapies. Glipizide/metformin tablets also reduced the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and the 3-hour postprandial glucose area under the concentration-time curve more effectively than did either monotherapy, without increasing the fasting insulin level. The greater blood glucose control with glipizide/ metformin tablets was achieved at a mean daily dose of glipizide/metformin 17.5/1747 mg, compared with mean doses of glipizide 30.0 mg or metformin 1927 mg. Treatments were well tolerated, with a low incidence of symptoms of hypoglycemia evidenced by a fingerstick blood glucose measurement < or = 50 mg/dL in the combination group (12.6%); 1 patient discontinued the study treatment for this reason. No patient required medical assistance for hypoglycemia.
                Glipizide/metformin tablets were more effective than either glipizide or metformin monotherapy in controlling HbA1c and in reducing FPG compared with baseline in patients with blood glucose that was uncontrolled with previous sulfonylurea treatment. In addition, patients receiving glipizide/ metformin were more likely to achieve an HbA1c level < 7.0%. These results were consistent with the synergistic effects on insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction. Glipizide/metformin was well tolerated, with a low incidence of hypoglycemia. The effect of long-term treatment with phenformin and metformin respectively on blood lactate concentrations in relation to submaximal muscular exercise has been examined in 21 maturity-onset diabetics, using a cross-over method. At similar degrees of diabetic control the mean blood lactate concentration during exercise and shortly thereafter was significantly higher when the patients had received phenformin. The mean fasting lactate concentration was 1.07 mmol/l with phenformin and 1.03 mmol/l with metformin and the peak concentration was 2.56 mmol/l and 2.19 mmol/l respectively. The mean fasting blood glucose concentration before the exercise was 11.2 mmol/l with phenformin and 11.3 mmol/l with metformin; the glucose output in the urine during the preceding 24 hours was 93 mmol and 105 mmol respectively. The mean work load during exercise was 60 watts. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of metformin on markers of endothelial function, vascular inflammation and factors of thrombosis in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Twenty-four type 2 diabetic patients (15 female, 9 male) previously under medical nutrition treatment (MNT)+regular exercise programme (REP) without chronic micro or macrovascular complications with the mean age of 50.5+/-1.5 years, diabetes duration of 17.9+/-6.3 months and body mass index (BMI) of 31.7+/-0.8 kg/m(2) were enrolled in the study. In the first 4 weeks, all the patients continued MNT+REP. In the following 12 weeks, metformin (mean daily dosage of 1381+/-85 mg) was added. After the first period with MNT+REP, BMI, waist circumference, fat percentage, blood pressure and HDL cholesterol decreased significantly. After metformin addition, there was a significant decrement in BMI, waist circumference, fat percentage, fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, hemoglobin A1C, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and increment in beta cell reserve values of the patients. Our results indicated that, metformin addition had beneficial effect on VEGF and PAI-1 levels in obese type 2 diabetic patients under MNT+REP, independent from its' favourable effects on BMI and glycemic control. To demonstrate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of acarbose compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and metformin (2,000 or 2,500 mg/day in divided doses).
                This study had a multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled parallel-group comparison design. The trial lasted 31 weeks and consisted of a 1-week screening period, a 6-week placebo pretreatment period, and a 24-week period of acarbose or placebo, with a forced titration from 25-50 mg t.i.d. and a titration of 50-100 mg tid that was based on glucose control. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline in HbA1c. Secondary efficacy variables included mean changes from baseline in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, serum insulin, and triglyceride levels.
                The addition of acarbose to patients on background metformin and diet therapy showed a statistically significant reduction in mean HbA1c of 0.65%. There were statistically significant reductions in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and serum insulin levels compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal side effects were more frequently reported in the acarbose-treated patients. No significant differences in liver transaminase elevations were observed between patients treated with acarbose and those treated with placebo.
                The results of this study demonstrate that the addition of acarbose to patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with metformin and diet is safe and generally well tolerated and that it significantly lowers HbA1c and fasting and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin therapy in patients with moderately severe (hemoglobin A(1c) >or= 8.0% and <or= 11.0%) type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                This was a multinational, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, double-blind study conducted in 190 patients with T2DM. After >or= 6 weeks of stable metformin monotherapy (>or= 1500 mg/day), patients were randomized to either the addition of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily or placebo to ongoing metformin for 30 weeks.
                The primary efficacy endpoint was reduction in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) measured after 18 weeks of sitagliptin treatment. Key secondary endpoints included reduction in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and 2-hour (2-h) postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) at 18 weeks, and HbA(1c) at 30 weeks. The proportion of patients meeting the goal of HbA(1c) < 7.0% was also analyzed.
                Sitagliptin significantly reduced HbA(1c), FPG, and 2-h PPG, compared with placebo (all p < 0.001). The net improvement in HbA(1c) was - 1.0% at both 18 and 30 weeks, and a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with sitagliptin achieved HbA(1c) < 7.0% by the end of the study (22.1% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001). Sitagliptin was well-tolerated. Compared with placebo, sitagliptin had a neutral effect on body weight and did not significantly increase the risk of hypoglycemia or gastrointestinal adverse events.
                Addition of sitagliptin 100 mg once daily to ongoing metformin therapy was well-tolerated and resulted in significant glycemic improvement in patients with moderately severe T2DM who were treated for 30 weeks. This study was performed to define the effect of metformin on glycaemic control and erythrocyte insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in patients with non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetes mellitus. A case-control study of the effect of metformin treatment in hyperglycaemic patients with Type 2 diabetes was conducted in outpatients of the Diabetes Clinical Center. The study population consisted of 14 patients with Type 2 diabetes (5 males, 9 females) whose hyperglycaemia was uncontrolled by diet. Patients were treated with metformin 850 mg twice daily for 2 1/2 months. Fasting plasma glucose concentrations decreased from 8.9 to 6.4 mmol/L after 10 weeks of metformin treatment (p < 0.001), in association with significantly lower (p < 0.001) plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in response to an oral glucose load. In addition, both fasting plasma triglyceride and cholesterol concentrations were significantly (p < 0.001) lower after metformin treatment. There was no change in erythrocyte insulin receptor binding associated with metformin treatment, but both basal and insulin-stimulated insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activities of solubilized erythrocyte insulin receptors were significantly higher after 10 weeks of metformin treatment. It is concluded that the increase in insulin-stimulated tyrosine kinase activity contributed to the improvement in glucose insulin and lipoprotein metabolism associated with metformin treatment of Type 2 diabetes. This randomized, open-label, cross-over study compares the efficacy of mealtime rapid-acting analog insulin aspart with human insulin, in combination with metformin. A total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled (HbA(1c)>7.5%) with oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs), were assigned to human insulin 30 min before meals or aspart immediately before meals, both with metformin 500 mg t.i.d. for 90 days. Patients then switched to the alternate insulin. At 90 and 180 days, blood glucose and lipids were measured at baseline and every 30 min after test meals, for 3h. HbA(1c) and hypoglycemic events were also assessed. After 3 months, HbA(1c) was significantly reduced with aspart, but not human insulin (-0.4+/-0.7% versus +0.1+/-0.7%, p<0.05). During meal tests, blood glucose area under the curve (AUC) was significantly lower with aspart than human insulin (1240+/-476 min/mmol/l versus 1588+/-766 min/mmol/l, p<0.01). AUCs for lipids were similar for both treatments. Neither group experienced serious hypoglycemic events. These results encourage treatment with mealtime insulin aspart plus metformin, in type 2 diabetes patients with postprandial hyperglycemia inadequately controlled by OHAs alone. We sought to determine whether pioglitazone and metformin alter NEFA-induced insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes and, if so, the mechanism whereby this is effected.
                Euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamps (glucose approximately 5.3 mmol/l, insulin approximately 200 pmol/l) were performed in the presence of Intralipid-heparin (IL/H) or glycerol before and after 4 months of treatment with pioglitazone (n = 11) or metformin (n = 9) in diabetic participants. Hormone secretion was inhibited with somatostatin in all participants.
                Pioglitazone increased insulin-stimulated glucose disappearance (p < 0.01) and increased insulin-induced suppression of glucose production (p < 0.01), gluconeogenesis (p < 0.05) and glycogenolysis (p < 0.05) during IL/H. However, glucose disappearance remained lower (p < 0.05) whereas glucose production (p < 0.01), gluconeogenesis (p < 0.05) and glycogenolysis (p < 0.05) were higher on the IL/H study day than on the glycerol study day, indicating persistence of NEFA-induced insulin resistance. Metformin increased (p < 0.001) glucose disappearance during IL/H to rates present during glycerol treatment, indicating protection against NEFA-induced insulin resistance in extrahepatic tissues. However, glucose production and gluconeogenesis (but not glycogenolysis) were higher (p < 0.01) during IL/H than during glycerol treatment with metformin, indicating persistence of NEFA-induced hepatic insulin resistance.
                We conclude that pioglitazone improves both the hepatic and the extrahepatic action of insulin but does not prevent NEFA-induced insulin resistance. In contrast, whereas metformin prevents NEFA-induced extrahepatic insulin resistance, it does not protect against NEFA-induced hepatic insulin resistance. Acarbose (Glucobay, Bayer) is a competitive inhibitor of intestinal alpha-glucosidases, which use causes inhibition of carbohydrate digestion. The aim of the study was to prospectively observe scheme of acarbose use as well as efficacy and safety of the drug in diabetic patients in general health care. The study was performed in general health care centres all around Poland. 200 physicians were involved, each one was asked to supervise use of acarbose in 3 patients. The whole patients population consisted of 600 persons. The physicians were asked to make records in provided formularies, prior to acarbose use and then after 4 and 8 weeks of the treatment: data from the interview (among others on diabetes type, disease duration, used diet, treatment incl. sulphonylurea or biguanide derivatives); personal data (age, height, weight, etc.); blood glucose level prior to and 2 hours postprandial; glycosuria; basic additional tests; basic lipid tests (total cholesterol, triglycerides); overall score of acarbose use (side effects, withdrawal, physicians and patients opinion on the drug). Fasting glycaemia was the criterion of inclusion into the analysis. Full data on this parameter were obtained in 480 patients (267 female and 213 male, aged 31-88 years). Acarbose was used as the only antidiabetic drug in 34% of the patients, combined with sulphonylurea in 44%, combined with sulphonylurea and biguanide (metformine) in 19% and combined with metformine only in several cases (3%). During the observation, significant weight and BMI loss, 3% reduction average (for both parameters), was observed in the whole studied group. Fasting and 2 hours postprandial glycaemia was markedly improved in the whole studied population (26.8% and 28.1% glucose level reduction, respectively), and particularly in those who was initially qualified into the group of bad diabetes control (29.4% and 32.4% glucose level decrease, respectively). The most favourable effect on glycaemia was observed for acarbose monotherapy (p < 0.005) when compared to combined treatment). No difference was found in glycaemic response referred to the initial body mass index (BMI). Tested lipid parameters improved during 8-week observation: serum cholesterol level decreased by 4.6% in the whole studied population, and by 8.9% in the group of bad diabetes control, respectively. Value differences did not reach, however, presumed statistical significance (p < 0.005). Significant improvement was noted in triglyceride levels: reductions by 17.5% in the whole group and by as much as 26.8% in the sub-group of bad diabetes control (initial level 200 mg/dl). Acarbose observational study performed in the routine treatment conditions confirmed efficacy of the drug in diabetes mellitus, for both--carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. The study showed low significance of side effects and high acceptation of the treatment by the patients and the physicians. Current therapeutic options for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) focus on regimens that primarily lower fasting blood glucose concentrations. In several short-term studies, the alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, acarbose, has been reported to significantly lower post-prandial plasma glucose levels as well as HbA1c. The primary objective of this present study was to assess the long-term efficacy of adjunctive acarbose therapy to improve metabolic control. Over a 1-y period, acarbose or placebo was administered to 4 groups of patients: those managed by diet only, diet and sulfonylurea, diet and biguanide, and diet and insulin. In all treatment groups, the addition of acarbose resulted in significant reductions in postprandial blood glucose levels. Additionally, HbA1C was significantly lower after 12 months of acarbose therapy, compared with placebo, in all groups except the diet and insulin group. The addition of acarbose consequently expands the armamentarium available to clinicians for the optimization of glycemic control in patients with NIDDM. This project was designed to evaluate the effects of melatonin and zinc on the glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with inadequate response to the oral hypoglycemic agent metformin.
                A placebo controlled, double-blind clinical trial was performed at the Specialized Center for Endocrinology and Diabetes, Al-Rusafa Directorate of Health, Baghdad, Iraq during the period from February to July 2005, in which 46 type 2 diabetic patients were selected and allocated into 3 groups, these groups were treated with single daily oral doses of both 10 mg melatonin and 50 mg zinc acetate alone; 10 mg melatonin and 50 mg zinc acetate in addition to the regularly used metformin or placebo, given at bed time for 90 days. We measured the fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) and serum C-peptide before starting the treatment (zero time) and after 30 and 90 days of treatment. We also performed post-prandial glucose excursion test (PPGE) for selected patients from the second and third groups before starting the treatment and after 90 days.
                Daily administration of melatonin and zinc improved the impaired fasting and post-prandial glycemic control and decreased the level of glycated hemoglobin; addition of this treatment regimen in combination with metformin improved the tissue responses to this oral hypoglycemic agent.
                The combination of melatonin and zinc acetate, when used alone or in combination with metformin improves fasting and post-prandial glycemic control in T2DM patients. Twenty-seven obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients, treated with dietary carbohydrate restriction and metformin, were recruited from the diabetic outpatient clinic and entered into an open crossover study with gliclazide. Twenty-one patients completed the study. During three months observation on metformin, the mean weight of the group fell by 1.0 kg with 14 patients losing a mean of 1.8 kg with 14 patients losing a mean of 1.8 kg, 3 remaining unchanged and 4 gaining a mean weight of 1.1 kg. Over the subsequent three months on gliclazide, the mean weight of the group rose by 1.4 kg with 16 patients gaining a mean of 2.2 kg, two remaining unchanged and 3 losing a mean of 2.0 kg. In addition, 10 patients were heavier after gliclazide than at the time of recruitment (mean 2.6 kg), 3 were unchanged and 8 had lost weight since commencing the trial (mean 2.1 kg), mostly due to greater loss on metformin than gain on gliclazide. Glycaemic control did not improve significantly during the observed period on metformin but lower concentrations of fasting glucose and total glycosylated haemoglobin were achieved with gliclazide. Mean plasma insulin concentration was significantly higher and mean serum lactate was significantly lower during treatment with gliclazide. In conclusion, gliclazide does not support weight loss in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients to the same extent as metformin but the difference between the two drugs is small. Gliclazide is a suitable oral hypoglycaemic agent for use in the obese diabetic who cannot be controlled by diet alone. Twelve hour metabolic rhythms have been performed on six maturity-onset diabetic subjects during successive periods of therapy with phenformin, metformin, and glibenclamide. Moderate control of blood glucose concentration was achieved with phenformin and metformin, the lowest concentrations being found with glibenclamide. Mean blood lactate concentration was grossly elevated during phenformin therapy, moderately elevated with metformin and normal during glibenclamide treatment. Similar patterns were found for the lactate/pyruvate ratio, alanine, glycerol and ketone bodies. Serum triglyceride concentrations were significantly higher during phenformin treatment than with the other two regimes. Serum insulin concentration was higher on glibenclamide than with either biguanide. Most of these effects of the biguanides could be accounted for by an inhibitory effect on hepatic gluconeogenesis. It is concluded that the use of biguanides as hypoglycaemic agents in diabetes is associated with the production of multiple metabolic abnormalities. The effects of metformin on glycaemia, insulin and c-peptide levels, hepatic glucose production and insulin sensitivity (using the euglycaemic, hyperinsulinaemic clamp) were evaluated at fortnightly intervals in 9 Type 2 diabetic patients using a stepwise dosing protocol: Stage 1--no metformin for four weeks; stage 2--metformin 500mg mane; stage 3--metformin 500mg thrice daily; stage 4--metformin 1000mg thrice daily. Results are expressed as Mean +/- SEM. Fasting blood glucose decreased from basal values (9.7 +/- 1.0 mmol/L) by 13% at stage 2, 34% at stage 3 and 41% at stage 4 (p less than 0.02 vs basal for all stages; p less than 0.02 stage 2 vs stage 3). Post-prandial glycaemia was significantly improved only with metformin 3000mg/day (p less than 0.05). Fasting, meal-stimulated and total insulin and c-peptide levels showed no change. Hepatic glucose output did not change significantly with metformin. Insulin sensitivity, measured as total glucose utilisation during hyperinsulinaemia, increased from stage 1 (10.3 +/- 2.1 mumoL/kg/min) by 23% at stage 3 (p less than 0.05) and by 29% at stage 4 (p less than 0.02). Basal metabolic clearance of glucose increased compared to stage 1 (1.69 +/- 0.16 mL/kg/min) by 30% at stage 2, 53% at stage 3 and 44% at stage 4 (all p less than 0.02). This study demonstrates that improved efficiency of glucose utilisation, both basally and under conditions of euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemia, is the basis of metformin's antihyperglycaemic action. Combined treatment with insulin plus metformin could be a good alternative to improve the glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus poorly controlled with insulin therapy. We retrospectively studied 21 obese insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients with deficient metabolic control (HbA1c 9.2 +/- 1.2%) who were treated with metformin for a minimum of 8 months. After 4 months of treatment, a significant decrease in the percentage of HbA1c was observed (delta HbA1c -1.07 +/- 1.12%; p < 0.01), with maintained values since then. Non changes in body weight or insulin requirement were noted. Our results suggest that the addition of metformin to insulin treatment is a safe and effective strategy for the improvement of glycemic control among obese type 2 diabetic patients. nan To study the effects of pioglitazone and metformin combination in type 2 diabetics in achieving long-term optimal glycemic control.
                Patients whose duration of type 2 diabetes was less than 24 months were selected for the study. 373 such patients meeting the selection criteria were included in the study and were started on triple drug combination therapy.
                Three hundred seventy three (183 females and 190 males) patients were initiated on a triple drug combination of gliclazide 80 mg, tid, metformin 500 mg tid and pioglitazone 30 mg od. Once controlled, the doses of gliclazide were reduced if the blood glucose levels decreased. Those patients whose plasma glucose remained in the normal range for more than 6 months without the use of a sulphonylurea were considered to be in pharmacological remission. 48 patients were lost to follow up. At the beginning of the study the pre treatment biochemical parameters in these 325 diabetic patients at the time of enrolment were: average FBG of 209.44+/-73.82 mg/dl, PLBG 294.96+/-107.58 mg/dl, and HbA(1c) 11.21+/-3.85. The post treatment glycemic parameters were: FBG was 124.38+/-40.48 mg/dl (p < 0.0001), and PLBG 162.32+/-54.33 mg/dl (p < 0.001), average glycosylated hemoglobin was 6.45+/-2.17 (p < 0.001). After using the triple drug combination pharmacological remission was achieved in 36.3 percent i.e. 118 (60 males and 58 females) patients. The average time required for achieving remission was 4 (+/-3.3) months in males and 5 (+/-4.02) months in females. 118 patients were maintained remission after 2 years of follow up. The average duration of remission is 27 (+/-2.66) months. There was an average weight gain of 2.56 +/- 1.32 kg in both the groups of patients in remission and those who could not achieve remission.
                In this study we have found that we could achieve long term glycemic control 'pharmacological remission' in 118 of the 325 patients i.e.36% of type 2 diabetic patients. Insulin sensitizers like pioglitazone along with metformin may induce long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients. Forty-eight diabetic subjects with diet-failed Type 2 mellitus, aged 40-69 years, were randomised to metformin (24 patients) or glipizide (24 patients) therapy, and followed prospectively for 12 months. Most subjects were obese. Metformin gave better fasting plasma glucose control compared to glipizide at 24 (p < 0.01), 36 (p < 0.05) and 52 weeks (p < 0.05) with a lower HbA1 concentration at 52 weeks (p < 0.05). Metformin treated patients lost weight whereas glipizide treated subjects gained weight. The weight change between the treatment groups reached significance at 4 weeks (p < 0.05) and was highly significant (p < 0.001) at 8, 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. There were no significant changes in either fasting plasma lipid or blood lactate levels in either the metformin or glipizide treated groups. Both drugs caused a similar reduction in albumin excretion rates. In conclusion, metformin gave better glycaemic control than glipizide, with weight loss rather than weight gain in obese Type 2 patients. In this study we compared, in 12 NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide, the effect of adding either a single, low-dose bed time NPH insulin injection (0.2 U/Kg) or an oral metformin administration (500 mg x 3) to the previously ineffective sulfonylurea treatment. The addition of both insulin and metformin treatment significantly improved fasting plasma glucose, post-prandial plasma glucose and %HbA1. The effect of both combined therapies was already evident and maximal after 2 weeks of treatment. The addition of bed-time NPH insulin caused a greater decrease of fasting plasma glucose, although the difference with the addition of metformin was not significant. In contrast, the average post-prandial plasma glucose decrease was significantly greater after metformin addition. The addition of bed-time NPH insulin caused a significant increase in average body weight, while after metformin addition, average body weight was unchanged; no change in the average cholesterol and triglyceride level was observed after either combined therapies. alpha-Glucosidase inhibitors such as acarbose improve blood glucose control in diabetes by delaying or reducing carbohydrate absorption. The fermentation of malabsorbed carbohydrate in the colon is associated with the production of gas, leading to flatulence, and short chain fatty acids such as acetate, which may have systemic effects. To see if acarbose raised fasting serum acetate in diabetic patients, we studied 85 subjects selected from the 267 who had completed a 1-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study of the effects of acarbose in the treatment of diabetes. At baseline, there was no significant difference between the 44 subjects subsequently randomized to placebo and the 41 randomized to acarbose, respectively, in fasting serum acetate (80 +/- 5 vs 71 +/- 4 mumoll-1) or glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1C; 7.2 +/- 0.3 vs 7.4 +/- 0.3%). Compared to placebo, acarbose treatment significantly increased fasting serum acetate by 11 +/- 4 vs 2 +/- 3 mumoll-1 (p < 0.02) and reduced HbA1C by -0.59 +/- 0.16 vs -0.13 +/- 0.20% (p < 0.02). Acarbose treatment had no significant effect on serum cholesterol or non-esterified fatty acids, but was associated with a significant increase in flatulence. There was no relationship between changes in serum acetate and changes in HbA1C, serum cholesterol or symptoms. We conclude, in subjects with diabetes who tolerate therapy for a 1-year period, that acarbose treatment increases serum acetate. The magnitude of change in acetate was unrelated to side-effects or changes in blood glucose control or serum lipids. In order to compare the effects of metformin and gliclazide on fasting serum insulin, 60 non-insulin dependent diabetics were included in a multi-centre study. Patients on a diabetic diet alone or a diabetic diet together with a sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agent, with a fasting glucose greater than 1.4 g/l, on two measurements were included in the study. They were randomly allocated to two parallel groups and received either gliclazide or metformin. They were treated for three months and attended for consultation at one month and three months. The fasting serum insulin level decreased significantly in the group receiving metformin (26.2 +/- 3.2 mlU/L at entry versus 19.8 +/- 2.3 mlU/L after three months: less than 0.01), and increased in a non-significant way in the group receiving gliclazide (21.6 +/- 3 mlU/L versus 26.5 +/- 5 mlU/L after three months: NS). The difference between the two groups was significant (p less than 0.01). There was a comparable significant improvement in blood sugar levels during the three months in both patients receiving gliclazide and metformin. However, significant weight loss (p less than 0.05) occurred only in patients receiving metformin. There was an identical improvement in blood sugar control in both patients receiving gliclazide and metformin over the three months. On the other hand, fasting serum insulin levels decreased significantly in patients receiving metformin compared to gliclazide. The effect of metformin on serum insulin levels is probably due to its action on insulin resistance and its lack of effect on insulin secretion, in contrast to sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents like gliclazide. To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a fixed combination glyburide/metformin preparation with those of glyburide or metformin alone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by sulphonylurea, diet and exercise.
                In this 16-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, 639 patients with inadequate glycaemic control on at least half-maximal dose of sulphonylurea were randomly assigned to: glyburide 10 mg b.i.d. (n = 164); metformin 500 mg (n = 153); glyburide/metformin 2.5 mg/500 mg (n = 160); or glyburide/metformin 5 mg/500 mg (n = 162). Titration was allowed to maximum doses of 2000 mg for metformin or 10 mg/2000 mg and 20 mg/2000 mg for glyburide/metformin 2.5 mg/500 mg and 5 mg/500 mg respectively. The primary outcome measure was HbA1c level after 16 weeks; secondary end-points included fasting and 2-h post-prandial plasma glucose. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and summarized by treatment group.
                Both strengths of glyburide/metformin equally reduced mean HbA1c by 1.7% more than did glyburide alone (p < 0.001), and by 1.9% more than did metformin alone (p < 0.001). Final mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations were also lower in both glyburide/metformin groups than in the glyburide (-2.8 mmol/l, -51.3 mg/dl; p < 0.001) and metformin groups (-3.6 mmol/l, -64.2 mg/dl; p < 0.001). Safety and tolerability were similar across all treatment groups, except for a higher incidence of gastrointestinal AEs in the metformin monotherapy group, and more patients reporting mild or moderate symptoms of hypoglycaemia while taking glyburide/metformin.
                Both glyburide/metformin tablet strengths produced, with equal efficacy, significantly better glycaemic control than monotherapy with either agent. These data also confirm that glycaemic efficacy does not require maximal sulphonylurea doses in combination with metformin. The efficacy and safety of metformin in the treatment of obese, non-insulin-dependent, diabetic subjects poorly controlled by insulin after secondary failure to respond to sulphonylureas has been investigated. Fifty insulin-treated, obese diabetics participated in this prospective, randomised double-blind six-month trial. After a four-week run-in period, during which all patients were given placebo (single-blind), patients were randomly assigned to continue to receive placebo or to active treatment with metformin. At six months, there was a relevant and significant improvement in glycaemic control in diabetics receiving the combined insulin-metformin treatment (decrease in glucose -4.1 mmol.l-1; glycosylated haemoglobin A1 decrease -1.84%). No significant changes were seen in diabetics receiving insulin and placebo. There was a significant decrease in blood lipids (trygliceride and cholesterol), an increase in HDL-cholesterol and a reduction in blood pressure in diabetics taking metformin. These positive findings were most marked in the 14 diabetics who experienced a good response to metformin (glucose profile < 10 mmol.l-1), and were less marked but still significant in the remaining 13 diabetics, whose response to therapy was not so good (glucose profile > 10 mmol.l-1). The fasting insulin level was significantly lower after six months of combined insulin-metformin treatment as shown by a 25% reduction in the daily dose of insulin (-21.6 U/day). Metformin was well tolerated by all diabetics.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Metformin treatment increases circulating homocysteine levels. We studied whether administration of folate reduces serum total homocysteine levels in patients on long-term metformin treatment.
                A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study lasting for 12 weeks and taking place in a university hospital setting.
                Thirty patients treated with a metformin dose of at least 1000 mg day-1 for a minimum of 1 year were included. At baseline serum total homocysteine levels were within the reference range. One patient who withdrew and one who died were excluded from the statistical evaluation. Twenty-six of the remaining patients suffered from NIDDM, the other two from hyperlipidaemia.
                Patients were randomized into two groups at week 0. The folate group received 0.25 mg day-1 of folate in addition to 60 mg day-1 of Fe2+, while the placebo group received only 60 mg day-1 of Fe2+.
                Fasting homocysteine, cysteine, cysteinylglycine, vitamin B12 and folate were measured at week 0, 4 and 12. Changes from week 0 to week 4 and from week 0 to week 12 were calculated.
                Folate administration reduced serum levels of total homocysteine in the folate group as compared with the placebo group by 13.9% (P < 0.01) and 21.7% (P < 0.001) at week 4 and 12, respectively. In the folate group versus the placebo group serum levels of vitamin B12 increased by 9.9% (P = 0.010) and 9.6% (P = 0.043) while folate levels increased by 96.9 and 89.9% at week 4 and 12, respectively.
                The present study indicates that the homocysteine-increasing effect of metformin can be counteracted by folate administration. A comparative open study of metformin unit doses of 500 mg and 850 mg was carried out in 64 obese, non-insulin dependent diabetics on 1.5 to 3 g metformin daily. Glycaemic response, blood lactate, plasma metformin concentrations and tolerance for metformin were assessed. On changing from a 500 mg unit dose to an equivalent total dose of metformin using the 850 mg preparation, there were no significant changes in the random blood glucose, glycated haemoglobin, or blood lactate concentrations. Metformin plasma concentrations remained unchanged except for patients transferred from 1.5 to 2.0 g daily to 850 mg twice daily; in these patients plasma concentrations increased from 1.83 +/- 0.87 to 2.50 +/- 0.89 micrograms/l (p less than 0.01). Seven patients (3 asymptomatic and 4 with background symptoms) became intolerant of the 850 mg regimen and required to return to the 500 mg dose regimen. After exclusion of patients intolerant of the 850 mg dose regimen (11%), the remaining patients noted no significant change in symptoms and 28% of all patients transferred to the 850 mg dose unit indicated an overall preference for this regimen. This 52-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study was designed to compare rosiglitazone/metformin fixed-dose combination therapy with combination sulphonylurea plus metformin therapy in overweight individuals with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                Individuals with inadequate glycaemic control (HbA (1c)> or =7%) while on metformin monotherapy (> or =0.85 g/day) entered a 4-week run-in period during which they received metformin 2 g/day. At the end of the run-in, individuals with fasting plasma glucose > or =7.0 mmol/l were randomized to treatment with metformin (2 g/day) and either rosiglitazone (4 mg/day; RSG+MET [N=294]) or a sulphonylurea (glibenclamide 5 mg/day or gliclazide 80 mg/day; SU+MET [N=302]). Medications were up-titrated to maximum tolerated doses (rosiglitazone 8 mg, glibenclamide 15 mg or gliclazide 320 mg plus metformin 2 g/day) during the first 12 weeks of double-blind treatment. The primary efficacy end point was the change in HbA (1c) from baseline after 52 weeks of treatment.
                RSG+MET was non-inferior to SU+MET with respect to changes in HbA (1c) after one year of treatment (DeltaHbA (1c)= -0.78% and -0.86%, respectively; treatment difference =0.09%, 95% CI=-0.08, 0.25). The HbA (1c) reductions with RSG+MET, but not SU+MET, were accompanied by significant improvements in measures of beta-cell function including proinsulin:insulin ratio. The degree of beta-cell failure was significantly greater with SU+MET compared to RSG+MET as measured by the coefficient of failure (0.543 vs. 0.055 HbA (1c)%/year, respectively, p=0.0002). The proportion of individuals who experienced hypoglycaemic events was significantly (p<0.0001) lower with RSG+MET (6%) than with SU+MET (30%). Diastolic ambulatory blood pressure and cardiovascular biomarkers (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) were also reduced following one year of treatment with RSG+MET but not SU+MET. Both treatments were generally well tolerated.
                Fixed-dose combination therapy with rosiglitazone/metformin is non-inferior to sulphonylurea plus metformin combination therapy in reducing HbA (1c) over one year of treatment. Improvements in measures of beta-cell function suggest that the improvements in glycaemic control may be better maintained in long-term therapy with the rosiglitazone/metformin combination. This study evaluated the effects on glycemic control of the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin in patients with mild-to-moderate, but suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes.
                In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 122 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled (A1c 7-8.5%) on metformin (> or =1000 mg/day for > or =3 months) were randomized to 16 weeks treatment with 2.5 mg/day glipizide GITS (n=61) or placebo (n=61), in addition to their current metformin dose. The primary efficacy variable was the change in A1c from baseline to endpoint. Changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin concentrations, lipid profile and safety variables were also measured.
                The addition of glipizide GITS to metformin gave significantly greater improvements in mean A1c and FPG from baseline to endpoint than placebo addition (p<0.0002). Significantly more patients in the glipizide GITS group than in the placebo group achieved the target A1c level of A1c<7.0% (p<0.0001) and an A1c<6.5% (p<0.0033). Fasting insulin concentrations were similar in both groups and unchanged by treatment. Addition of glipizide GITS to metformin did not produce any significant or clinically relevant weight gain or changes in BMI. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated.
                This study showed that the addition of 2.5 mg glipizide GITS to metformin significantly improved glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy. Monitoring of metabolic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent (Type 2) diabetes (NIDDM) is usually based upon blood glucose assay in the morning (after an overnight fast) and in the postprandial state (breakfast or lunch). However, this schedule does not seek low blood glucose values, especially in the evening. We have conducted a prospective study of laboratory blood glucose profiles (8 am, 9.30 am after a 35 g carbohydrate breakfast and in the evening between 5 and 7 pm). We have included 58 consecutive NIDDM patients regularly followed in our clinic (39 men, age 60 +/- 11.5 years, diabetes duration 8.6 +/- 6.5 years, BMI 25.5 +/- 3 kg m-2), treated with the sulphonylurea gliclazide, alone (40-320 mg 24 h-1, mean 170 +/- 110 mg) (group 1, n = 32) or in combination with metformin (1000-3000 mg 24 h-1, 2400 +/- 620 mg) (group 2, n = 26). All patients were stable, with no change in dosage for at least 3 months. Mean glycaemic control was good (group 1 HbA1c: 6.5 +/- 1.1%, group 2: 6.9 +/- 0.7%). Evening blood glucose values were the lowest of the day in 26 patients of group 1 (81.3%) and in 22 of group 2 (84.6%). Mean evening blood glucose levels were lower (p = 0.001) than 8 am values (group 1: 5.8 +/- 1.4 vs 6.1 +/- 1.6 mmol l-1, group 2: 6.5 +/- 1.8 vs 6.9 +/- 1.9) and than 9.30 am values (group 1: 7.6 +/- 1.5, group 2: 12.3 +/- 2.8). No blood glucose values in the hypoglycaemic range were observed. HbA1c was strongly correlated (p = 0.002 to 0.0001) in the whole group with 8 am (r = 0.39), 9.30 am (r = 0.56), and evening blood glucose values (r = 0.42). These results indicate that, in patients treated with the sulphonylurea gliclazide, alone or in combination with metformin, the lowest blood glucose values occur in the evening more frequently (4/5) than in the morning. Therefore, evening blood glucose determination should be performed systematically in the course of the metabolic evaluation of NIDDM patients on oral hypoglycaemic agents. Metformin is a biguanide that has been shown to effectively lower plasma glucose levels in subjects with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). However, its mechanism of action remains unknown. Studies that have examined the effect of metformin on hepatic glucose production (HGP) and muscle glucose utilization in NIDDM have yielded conflicting results, and little information is available about the action of metformin on lactate turnover and gluconeogenesis from lactate in humans. We studied 20 NIDDM subjects and 8 nondiabetic controls in a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of 15 weeks of treatment with metformin or placebo on glucose and lactate metabolism. Before and after treatment, all participants received a 7-h infusion of [6-3H]glucose and [3-14C]lactate in combination with indirect calorimetry and estimation of lactate central vein specific activity. A euglycemic insulin clamp (20 mU/m2.min) was performed during the last 3 h of the tracer infusions. The study design allowed us to evaluate the effects of metformin vs. placebo treatment on glycemic control, plasma lipid profile, HGP, insulin-mediated glucose uptake, oxidative and nonoxidative glucose metabolism, and lactate turnover. Metformin treatment significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose (196 +/- 18 vs. 152 +/- 12 mg/dL; P < 0.01), hemoglobin A1 (12.5 +/- 0.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 0.3%; P < 0.01), and plasma triglyceride and low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations. When diabetics were compared to nondiabetic controls, basal HGP was higher (12.9 +/- 1.0 vs. 9.8 +/- 1.2 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01) despite the presence of fasting hyperinsulinemia and insulin-mediated total body glucose disposal (10.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 20.2 +/- 3.3 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01) was decreased. Metformin significantly reduced fasting HGP (from 12.9 +/- 0.7 to 11.0 +/- 0.5 mumol/kg.min; P < 0.01), but did not enhance total body glucose disposal during insulin stimulation (10.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 11.0 +/- 0.5 mumol/kg.min; P = NS). Neither oxidative nor nonoxidative glucose disposal was improved by metformin treatment. The fasting plasma lactate concentration (1.1 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.6 +/- 0.1 mmol/L) and lactate turnover (14.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 10.3 +/- 0.6 mumol/kg.min) were significantly increased in diabetics and strongly correlated (r = 0.68; P < 0.001). The percent gluconeogenesis derived from lactate was similar in diabetic and control subjects (17 +/- 2% vs. 15 +/- 2%; P = NS), but the estimated rate of gluconeogenesis from lactate was increased in the diabetic group (P < 0.01). Despite the significant reduction in HGP after metformin treatment, the percentage of gluconeogenesis from lactate and the rate of lactate-derived gluconeogenesis were unchanged from baseline. Basal lactate turnover (15.4 +/- 1.4 vs. 14.8 +/- 1.4 mumol/kg.min) and lactate oxidation (7.9 +/- 0.7 vs. 8.1 +/- 0.9 mumol/ kg.min) as well as total lactate turnover and lactate oxidation during the insulin clamp were similar before and after metformin treatment. There were no changes in any of the above metabolic parameters in the placebo-treated group. In poorly controlled NIDDM subjects, the primary mechanism by which metformin improves glycemic control is related to the suppression of accelerated basal HGP, and this most likely is secondary to an inhibition of hepatic glycogenolysis. Metformin has no effect on the rate of lactate turnover or gluconeogenesis from lactate in either the basal or insulin-stimulated states. Principal: to show that the addition of metformin to insulin treatment in type-2 DM obese patients with poor metabolic control (HbA1c > 7.5%) causes a 50% increase after one year in the number of patients with acceptable (HbA1c < or = 7.5%) or good (HbA1c < 6.5%) control, and to determine how many patients reduced their HbA1c by a point. Secondary: to determine the relationship between the BMI at the start of treatment and the difference between HbA1c values before and after treatment.
                Quasi-experimental before-and-after intervention study.
                Diabetes clinic at the San Carlos Hospital, consisting of patients referred from primary care.
                31 obese people with type-2 DM and with poor metabolic control (HbA1c > 7.5%) in spite of insulin treatment were chosen by consecutive sampling as they attended for consultation. Three people left due to their intolerance of metformin.
                Metformin was added progressively over a year in total doses of 1.7 mg. All those parameters considered in diabetes control were measured, the main criterion of evaluation being the HbA1c figures.
                Patients with poor metabolic control changed from 100% at the start of the study to 42.9% after a year (p = 0.0000). There was a 1.75% mean reduction of HbA1c. 78.57% of patients reduced their HbA1c by a point. The relationship between the BMI before the start of treatment and the HbA1c difference at the start and end gave a Pearson's correlation coefficient of r = -0.39 (p = 0.04).
                Adding metformin to the treatment of obese type-2 DM patients with poor metabolic control and on insulin treatment improved their control. Blood glucose, lipoproteins, non-esterified fatty acids, fibrinogen and intermediary metabolites were measured in twenty-two diet failed maturity onset diabetics during a double blind crossover study of metformin (1.7 g/day) or clofibrate (2 g/day) therapy. Patients received combined therapy for a final two month period. Four patients had 12 hour metabolic profiles performed during each treatment period. A more significant improvement in fasting blood glucose and glycosuria occured with metformin and combined therapy. However, clofibrate and combined therapy significantly decreased total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, total and very low density lipoprotein triglyceride and fibrinogen. Metabolic profiles demonstrated significant elevations of blood lactate and alanine with metformin treatment but these parameters returned to normal with combined therapy. Non-esterified fatty acids and glycerol were significantly lower during combined therapy compared with metformin or clofibrate alone. Despite the recent adverse report on clofibrate, this study indicates that the addition of clofibrate to metformin therapy may have advantages in the management of maturity onset diabetics. The sulfonylurea gliclazide and the biguanide metformin have different mechanisms to reduce glycemia. We performed a randomized study to compare these two agents with respect to glycemic control and effects on lipid peroxidation markers in 36 adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Both agents significantly decreased glycosylated hemoglobin ([HbA1c] P < .05), fructosamine (P < .05), and the glucose-excursion curve during the oral glucose tolerance test ([OGTT] P < .01). With regard to the insulin curve during this test, no significant change was observed with metformin and a significant increase was measured with gliclazide (P < .05). Considering the small number of events, no significant difference was detected in the number of hypoglycemic episodes between the two agents. More upper-gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were observed with metformin compared with gliclazide (P < .05). Even with no change in the standard lipid profile, both agents increased serum vitamin E (P < .01 for gliclazide and P < .05 for metformin) and decreased the level of lipid peroxidation markers in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (P < .05). Despite different mechanisms of action, gliclazide and metformin demonstrated comparable levels of efficacy and complementary effects on lipid peroxidation markers. Thiazolidinediones (TZD) have become a powerful tool for lowering insulin resistance. The problem of cardiovascular adverse events including fluid retention and risk of heart failure should be well known and recognised. We aimed to evaluate the long-term effects of rosiglitazone on cardiac function and fluid dynamics. Forty-six type 2 diabetic patients were randomised to treatment with rosiglitazone or metformin or to a control group. There are no significant differences between the groups in the duration of diabetes, HbA1c, plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels, body mass index and myocardial performance indexes (MPIs) before the treatment. After three and six months all these parameters were repeated. Rosiglitazone increased plasma BNP levels and worsened MPIs 3 months after the start of treatment. Also left ventricular end-systolic volume increased and weight gain was observed. But these results were statistically non-significant (all p>0.05). When we continued rosiglitazone treatment to six months the increase in BNP levels became soft and statistically significant improvements were seen in MPIs (p<0.01). Also left ventricular end-systolic volume decreased significantly (p=0.004) and weight gain was stopped. In patients with type 2 diabetes, TZD treatment might have slight adverse effects on ventricular contractility and fluid dynamics at the beginning of the therapy. However, these changes seem to stabilise in the long term. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of nateglinide (120 mg, ac) and metformin (500 mg, tid) as initial treatment in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Research design and methods: This study reports data from the treatment-naïve (TN) subgroup of patients in a previously published, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, 24- week trial that compared nateglinide, metformin, and the combination therapy (CT) in 701 patients with T2DM with baseline HbA(1c) between 6.8% and 11.0%. Of the 401 TN patients, 104, 104, 89, and 104 patients received nateglinide (120 mg, ac), metformin (500 mg, tid), CT, and placebo, respectively. The baseline characteristics of each group were similar, with mean age, BMI, duration of diabetes, HbA(1c), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of approximately 58 years, 30 kg/m(2), 4 Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in 27% of years, 8.2%, and 10.2 mmol/L, respectively.
                In patients receiving initial CT, HbA(1c) decreased substantially (Delta = -1.6 +/- 0.1%, p < 0.0001 vs. baseline or placebo) from a mean baseline of 8.2 +/- 0.1%, an effect significantly greater than the 0.8% reduction observed with both monotherapies (p < 0.001); whereas, in placebo-treated patients, HbA(1c) increased modestly (Delta = +0.3 +/- 0.1%, p < 0.05) from an identical baseline value. Seventy percent of CT-treated patients achieved a target HbA(1c) of < 7.0%. Both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and the 2-hour postprandial glucose excursion (PPGE) after a liquid meal challenge decreased by 2.3 mmol/L in patients receiving CT, while the changes from baseline values in FPG and PPGE were +0.2 +/- 0.3 mmol/L and -0.5 +/- 0.2 mmol/L, respectively, in placebo-treated patients. The incremental 30-minute post-load insulin levels increased by 88 +/- 32 pmol/L (p = 0.006) in patients receiving CT and did not change significantly in placebo-treated patients. patients receiving CT (vs. 27.9% in the metformin monotherapy, and 14.4% in the placebo groups). Confirmed hypoglycemia (glucose <or= 2.8 mmol/L) occurred in 3.4% of patients receiving CT.
                Initial CT with the rapid-acting insulinotropic agent, nateglinide, and metformin, an agent with insulin-sensitizing effects in the liver and periphery, is a safe and effective means of achieving glycemic targets in TN patients with T2DM. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke (by a factor of two to three compared with non-diabetic patients), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the majority of deaths among patients with diabetes. A new fixed dose combination containing atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg is being introduced in the Indian market for the treatment of dyslipidaemia in diabetic patients. The present study was therefore undertaken to assess efficacy, safety and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10mg + metformin SR 500mg in adult Indian patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. The final protocol was approved by relevant ethics committee before the initiation of study. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to enrollment in study. The total duration of study was 14 weeks including two weeks dietary run in period. Patients fulfilling the selection criteria received a single oral tablet of fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10mg + metformin SR 500mg once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy parameters were assessed by evaluating reduction in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentration levels at baseline and thereafter at each follow up visit at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks and plasma lipid profile and glycosylated Hb levels at baseline and end of study. The secondary efficacy parameters were assessed by evaluating percentage change from baseline at the end of the study (week 12) in the plasma concentration of the various lipid parameters such as total, HDL-, LDL- and very low density (VLDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, Apo B, Apo A1, TC/LDL ratio, LDL/ HDL ratio, and percentage of patients achieving LDL-cholesterol goals as per NCEP ATP III guidelines. A total of 213 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these seven patients were lost to follow-up and considered as drop-outs. Therapy with the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg resulted in a significant reduction in the mean plasma fasting and postprandial glucose levels (35 and 38.8% respectively). There was a steep fall in the HbA1c levels from baseline levels of 8.76% to 6.74% (23.1%). There was also a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in mean total cholesterol (31.2%), LDL cholesterol (35.4%), VLDL-cholesterol (19.6%) and a significant increase HDL-cholesterol (9.5%). Thus there appeared to be trend towards reducing atherosclerosis following therapy with the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg. Mean body mass index was significantly reduced in the patients in the present study following therapy with the study drugs. The fixed dose combination of atorvastatin with metformin was well tolerated with mostly gastro-intestinal adverse events being reported in the current study. Moreover, most of the adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and disappeared with continued treatment. In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that, the fixed dose combination of atorvastatin 10 mg + metformin SR 500 mg is efficacious and well tolerated therapeutic modality in patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. Furthermore this combination offers dosage convenience to the patient and by virtue of its dual mode of action is a useful addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for patients with diabetic dyslipidaemia. 60 NIDDM patients, mean age (68 +/- 3 years), BMI (25 +/- 5.1 kg/m2), fasting blood glucose (FG) (170 +/- 10 mg/dl), mean daily blood glucose (MDBG) (180 +/- 10 mg/dl), daily glycosuria (GLU) (15.6 +/- 9 g/24 hours), HbA1c (7.9 +/- 0.6%), basal (1.2 +/- 0.2 ng/ml) and stimulated (3.89 +/- 1.3 mg/ml) C peptide (CP) treated by ASS (7.5 +/- 75 mg), after a strict 4 months follow-up period, were assigned to G + M treatment (7.5 +/- 1.500 mg) during a 4 months period. During G+M treatment FG (171 +/- 13 at t0 to 165 +/- 11 mg/dl: p < 0.01 at t4) varied significantly. MDBG (180 +/- 10 at t0 to 175 +/- 12 mg/dl at t4:p < 0.05), GLU (16 +/- 9 at t0 to 11 + 6 g/24 hours at t4; p < 0.01), HbA1c (8.1 +/- 0.4 at t0 to 7.6 +/- 0.3% at t4; p < 0.01). Basal CP remained unchanged in G+M period and varied significantly during ASS period (1.3 +/- 0.3 ng/ml at t4; p < 0.01) and stimulated CP (unchanged during ASS) was reduced during G+M (4.19 +/- 0.4 to 4.04; p < 0.05). Highly significant variations were observed for LAC (28.4 +/- 2.1 at t0 to 14.9 +/- 0.6 mg/dl: p < 0.01 during G+M treatment). G+M therapy was found to be more effective and safer than ASS therapy in regard to glucose metabolism and lactate production in a selected group of NIDDM patients. Effects of metformin and pioglitazone on body weight are clearly different. Recently, the role of ghrelin, an orexigenic peptide derived from stomach, has been appreciated. Plasma ghrelin levels display a preprandial peak and postprandial suppression, suggesting its physiological role. We hypothesized that metformin or pioglitazone may modulate circulating ghrelin levels and this modulation may be related to differential effects on body weight with these agents.
                Thirty-five Japanese type 2 diabetic patients [21 men and 14 women, age 62 +/- 2 years, body mass index (BMI) 26.6 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2) and haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.2 +/- 0.1%, mean +/- s.e.] were randomly assigned to groups for the addition of metformin or pioglitazone. At baseline and 4 months later, a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed to measure plasma ghrelin levels.
                In 33 subjects who completed the study, the overall decrease in HbA1c ( approximately 1%) was comparable between the two groups. As expected, BMI increased in the pioglitazone group but not in the metformin group. After the treatment, plasma ghrelin levels at each point of OGTT remained unchanged in the pioglitazone group. In the metformin group, fasting ghrelin levels were unaltered, whereas the absolute levels at 30, 60 and 120 min decreased significantly. The area under the curve for the 2-h ghrelin profile also decreased significantly.
                Metformin, but not pioglitazone, decreased plasma ghrelin levels after the glucose load. This decrease may in part account for weight stability in type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin. To determine fibrinogen levels in obese patients with type 2 diabetes and assess its changes with the use of metformin.
                60 obese patients (BMI > 27) with type 2 diabetes were studied in an open, two phase, prospective, randomized and comparative study. The pre-treatment phase was a period of four weeks of a controlled diet. In the treatment phase they were divided in two subgroups of 30. One received metformin as a daily single tablet of 850 mg and increasing the dosage to two or three tablets depending on their metabolic control. The second subgroup received 24 units of DNA-recombinant insulin subcutaneously (two thirds of dose before breakfast, and the remaining third before dinner). The insulin dosage was adjusted according to the metabolic response. A control group was formed by 60 non diabetic obese patients with only the controlled diet.
                The mean values of plasma glucose, fibrinogen levels and body mass index did not change in the pretreatment phase in controls and diabetics. These parameters decreased significantly in the metformin subgroup in the treatment phase (p < 0.001). Only glucose decreased in the insulin subgroup. There were no changes in the controls.
                In addition to improving metabolic control, metformin showed to be a good therapeutic alternative in modifying fibrinogen levels in type 2 diabetic patients. Combination therapy is logical for patients with non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes mellitus, because they often have poor responses to single-drug therapy. We studied the efficacy and physiologic effects of metformin and troglitazone alone and in combination in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                We randomly assigned 29 patients to receive either metformin or troglitazone for three months, after which they were given both drugs for another three months. Plasma glucose concentrations during fasting and postprandially and glycosylated hemoglobin values were measured periodically during both treatments. Endogenous glucose production and peripheral glucose disposal were measured at base line and after three and six months.
                During metformin therapy, fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations decreased by 20 percent (58 mg per deciliter [3.2 mmol per liter], P<0.001) and 25 percent (87 mg per deciliter [4.8 mmol per liter], P<0.001), respectively. The corresponding decreases during troglitazone therapy were 20 percent (54 mg per deciliter [2.9 mmol per liter], P=0.01) and 25 percent (83 mg per deciliter [4.6 mmol per liter], P<0.001). Endogenous glucose production decreased during metformin therapy by a mean of 19 percent (P=0.001), whereas it was unchanged by troglitazone therapy (P=0.04 for the comparison between groups). The mean rate of glucose disposal increased by 54 percent during troglitazone therapy (P=0.006) and 13 percent during metformin therapy (P= 0.03 for the comparison within the group and between groups). In combination, metformin and troglitazone further lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations by 18 percent (41 mg per deciliter [2.3 mmol per liter], P=0.001) and 21 percent (54 mg per deciliter [3.0 mmol per liter], P<0.001), respectively, and the mean glycosylated hemoglobin value decreased 1.2 percentage points.
                Metformin and troglitazone have equal and additive beneficial effects on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Metformin acts primarily by decreasing endogenous glucose production, and troglitazone by increasing the rate of peripheral glucose disposal. Metformin often promotes weight loss in patients with obesity with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The mechanism may be attributed to decreased food intake. This study has tested the effect of metformin on satiety and its efficacy in inducing weight loss. Twelve diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity were randomly given two dose levels (850 mg or 1700 mg) of metformin or placebo at 0800 for three consecutive days followed by a meal test on the third day on three occasions using a 3x3 Latin square design. The number of sandwich canapes eaten in three consecutive 10-minute periods beginning at 1400 hours was used to quantitate food intake, and the level of subjective hunger was rated just before the sandwich meal with a linear analogue hunger rating scale at 1400 after a 6-hour fast. The prior administration of metformin produced a reduction in calorie intake after each of the two doses of metformin treatment. The 1700-mg metformin dose had the most marked appetite suppressant action. Similarly, hunger ratings were significantly lowered after metformin, and the effect was most pronounced after the administration of 1700 mg of metformin. To assess the efficacy of metformin in reducing bodyweight, 48 diet-treated NIDDM women with obesity who had failed to lose weight by diet therapy were first placed on a 1200-kcal ADA (American Diabetes Association) diet before being randomized to receive either metformin (850 mg) or placebo twice daily in a double-blind fashion for 24 weeks. A 4-week single-blind placebo lead-in period preceded and a 6-week single-blind placebo period followed the 24-week double-blind treatment period. Subjects treated with metformin continued to lose weight throughout 24 weeks of treatment; their mean maximum weight loss was 8 kg greater than that of the placebo group, with corresponding lower HbA1C and fasting blood glucose levels at the end of the active treatment period. These results indicate that metformin decreases calorie intake in a dose-dependent manner and leads to a reduction in bodyweight in NIDDM patients with obesity. We have investigated the effects of metformin treatment on concentrations of proinsulin-like molecules in subjects with Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Metformin was given for 12 weeks in an increasing dose up to 850 mg three times daily in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design to 27 subjects (age 53.0 +/- 9.9 years; 19 male, 8 female). Concentrations of insulin and proinsulin-like molecules were measured by highly specific enzymoimmunometric assays. The end of metformin treatment was compared with end of placebo treatment. Metformin lowered fasting plasma glucose concentrations (at 12 weeks, metformin: 8.0 +/- 2.5 vs placebo: 12.0 +/- 2.3 mmol l-1, p r2 0.001;). Concentrations of intact (median change -2.9 (range -28.4 to +2.5 pmol l-1), p = 0.02) and des 31,32 proinsulin (median change -1.6 (range -14.1 to +5.4 pmol l-1), p = 0.07) and percentage of proinsulin-like molecules were reduced by metformin treatment (median change -6% (range -16% to +6%), p = 0.02). Changes in the ratio of proinsulin-like molecules were significantly related with those in fasting plasma glucose (r1 = 0.69, p < 0.001). Changes in concentrations of intact and des 31,32 proinsulin on metformin were not related to changes in body mass index or fasting glucose concentration or changes in concentrations of total triglyceride, cholesterol, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Therefore, metformin treatment in subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus significantly reduced concentrations of proinsulin-like molecules over a 12-week period. However, these changes were not related to changes in cardiovascular risk factors seen during metformin treatment. We conclude that short-term effects of metformin treatment on proinsulin-like molecules are similar to those previously observed with dietary treatment in subjects with Type 2 diabetes but opposite to those of sulphonylurea treatment. The effect of long-term treatment with metformin on proinsulin-like molecules needs to be assessed. The effects of metformin on the fibrinolytic system were studied pre- and post-venous occlusion in 38 Type 2 diabetic patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. After a 3-week run-in period, 21 patients received metformin and 17 placebo, for 6 weeks. In the metformin-treated patients basal plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen (PAI-1Ag) fell from 57.4 micrograms l-1 before treatment to 36.1 (p less than 0.05) and 41.0 micrograms l-1 (p less than 0.01) after 3 and 6 weeks therapy. In this group post-venous occlusion PAI-1Ag also fell after 3 weeks (p less than 0.002) and 6 weeks (p less than 0.05) treatment. There were no changes in either basal or post-venous occlusion concentrations of PAI-1Ag in the placebo treated group. The fall in PAI-1Ag was not associated with an increase in basal plasminogen activator activity (PAA) which remained unchanged in both groups. Post-venous occlusion values for PAA in the metformin treated patients were increased at 3 weeks (p less than 0.05) although there was no difference at 6 weeks. This study was aimed to compare the effect of insulin plus rosiglitazone with that of insulin plus metformin on the level of serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-BNP) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to find out whether serum NT-BNP can be used as an index for predicting heart failure induced by rosiglitazone in the cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sixty type 2 diabetic patients were recruited and were randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 30) received insulin plus rosiglitazone (4 mg/d) and group B (n = 30) received insulin plus metformin. The observations covered an 8-weeks' course of treatment. Serum NT-BNP was measured at the beginning and at the end of 8 weeks. The Before-After study revealed that the level of serum NT-BNP did not change apparently in the two groups (P >0.05). There was no remarkable difference in the level of serum NT-BNP between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 3 cases with edema in the group of insulin plus rosiglitazone, but none with heart failure; in these three cases, the mean serum NT-BNP level at the end of the treatment exhibited an increase of 108.99 fmol/ml when compared with that at the beginning. Neither insulin plus rosiglitazone nor insulin plus metformin had apparent effect on the level of serum NT-BNP in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The question of whether serum NT-BNP is a predictive index of heart failure awaits answers given by more observation on type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using rosiglitazone. Euglycemic insulin glucose-clamp and insulin-binding studies on erythrocytes and monocytes were performed in seven type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic subjects before and after 4 wk of metformin treatment (850 mg 3 times/day) and in five obese subjects with normal glucose tolerance. Glucose turnover was also measured at basal insulin concentrations and during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps. During euglycemic insulin-glucose clamps, diabetic subjects showed glucose disposal rates of 3.44 +/- 0.42 and 7.34 +/- 0.34 mg X kg-1 X min-1 (means +/- SD) before metformin at insulin infusion rates of 0.80 and 15.37 mU X kg-1 X min-1, respectively. With the same insulin infusion rates, glucose disposal was 4.94 +/- 0.55 (P less than .01) and 8.99 +/- 0.66 (P less than .01), respectively, after metformin treatment. Glucose disposal rates in normal obese subjects were 5.76 +/- 0.63 (P less than .01) and 10.92 +/- 1.11 (P less than .01) at 0.80 and 15.37 mU X kg-1 X min-1, respectively. Insulin maximum binding to erythrocytes in diabetics was 9.6 +/- 4.2 and 5.8 +/- 2.6 X 10(9) cells (means +/- SD) before and after metformin treatment, respectively (NS). Insulin maximum binding to monocytes in diabetics was 6.2 +/- 2.3 X 10(7) cells before and 5.0 +/- 1.6% after metformin. Hepatic glucose production was higher in the diabetic patients at basal insulin levels, but not at higher insulin concentrations, and was not significantly changed by drug treatment. Basal glucose and insulin concentrations decreased with metformin. Thus, metformin treatment improved glucose disposal rate without significant effect on insulin-binding capacity on circulating cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To define the metabolic effects of metformin in the treatment of NIDDM and to evaluate potential mechanisms for its ability to improve glycemic control.
                Sulfonylurea-treated patients, with inadequate glycemic control, were treated with metformin in either a placebo-controlled or open fashion. Measurements were made of 1) fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations; 2) glucose appearance and disappearance rates measured overnight with 3-[3H]glucose; and 3) plasma FFA concentrations during a 45-min infusion period at relatively low (approximately 60 pmol/l) insulin concentrations.
                Mean +/- SE hourly plasma glucose, insulin, and FFA concentrations were similar before and after treatment in the placebo group. In contrast, mean hourly plasma glucose concentrations were significantly lower (P < 0.005) after metformin treatment in both the placebo-controlled and open-label groups (-3.9 +/- 1.0 and -4.4 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, respectively). Similarly, day-long hourly FFA levels were lower (P < 0.005) following metformin in the placebo-controlled and open-label groups (-87 +/- 35 and -136 +/- 31 mumol/l, respectively). Plasma insulin concentrations did not change with treatment in any group. Overnight glucose turnover studies indicated that neither the rate of glucose appearance (hepatic glucose production) or glucose disappearance changed significantly with treatment in the placebo or metformin groups. Because plasma glucose concentration was much lower after metformin treatment, overnight glucose metabolic clearance rate was significantly (P < 0.001) lower in this group. Finally, plasma FFA concentrations in response to a low-dosage insulin infusion (5 mU.m-2.min-1) were significantly lower after metformin as compared with the placebo-treated group (P < 0.001).
                Metformin treatment was associated with significantly lower day-long plasma glucose and FFA concentrations. Although overnight hepatic glucose production was unchanged following treatment with metformin, the overnight glucose metabolic clearance rate significantly increased. Given these findings, it is suggested that at least part of the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin is due to an increase in glucose uptake, secondary to a decrease in release of FFA from adipose tissue, and lower circulating FFA concentrations. To evaluate further the relative roles played by liver and adipose tissue in the therapeutic response to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                A total of 11 patients with diet-treated type 2 diabetes were given metformin for approximately 3 months. Measurements were made before and after treatment of 1) fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, insulin, and free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations; 2) glucose appearance (Ra) and disappearance (Rd) rates measured overnight with 3-[3H]glucose; and 3) plasma FFA concentrations during a 195-min infusion period at relatively low insulin (approximately 12-24 microU/ml) concentrations.
                Mean +/- SEM fasting plasma glucose concentration was significantly lower (175 +/- 11 vs. 224 +/- 15 mg/dl; P < 0.01) after treatment with metformin. Mean +/- SEM insulin concentrations measured from 8:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. did not change with treatment. However, both glucose and FFA concentrations were significantly lower (P < 0.01) when measured over the same time period, and the decreases in plasma FFA and glucose concentration were highly correlated (r = 0.81; P = 0.03). Overnight glucose turnover studies indicated that neither Ra (hepatic glucose production [HGP]) nor Rd changed significantly with treatment in association with metformin treatment. Since plasma glucose concentration was much lower after metformin treatment, the overnight glucose metabolic clearance rate (MCR) was significantly lower (P < 0.01). Finally, the ability of insulin to inhibit isoproterenol-stimulated increases in plasma FFA concentration was enhanced in metformin-treated patients (P < 0.05).
                Metformin treatment was associated with significantly lower fasting plasma glucose concentrations and lower day-long plasma glucose and FFA concentrations. Although overnight HGP was unchanged after treatment with metformin, the overnight glucose MCR was significantly increased, and the antilipolytic activity of insulin was also enhanced. Given these findings, it is suggested that at least part of the antihyperglycemic effect of metformin is due to a decrease in release of FFA from adipose tissue, leading to lower circulating FFA concentrations and an increase in glucose uptake. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus vs placebo and insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin), all in combination with metformin and glimepiride.
                This randomised (using a telephone or web-based randomisation system), parallel-group, controlled 26 week trial of 581 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on prior monotherapy (HbA(1c) 7.5-10%) and combination therapy (7.0-10%) was conducted in 107 centres in 17 countries. The primary endpoint was HbA(1c). Patients were randomised (2:1:2) to liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (n = 232), liraglutide placebo (n = 115) and open-label insulin glargine (n = 234), all in combination with metformin (1 g twice daily) and glimepiride (4 mg once daily). Investigators, participants and study monitors were blinded to the treatment status of the liraglutide and placebo groups at all times.
                The number of patients analysed as intention to treat were: liraglutide n = 230, placebo n = 114, insulin glargine n = 232. Liraglutide reduced HbA(1c) significantly vs glargine (1.33% vs 1.09%; -0.24% difference, 95% CI 0.08, 0.39; p = 0.0015) and placebo (-1.09% difference, 95% CI 0.90, 1.28; p < 0.0001). There was greater weight loss with liraglutide vs placebo (treatment difference -1.39 kg, 95% CI 2.10, 0.69; p = 0.0001), and vs glargine (treatment difference -3.43 kg, 95% CI 4.00, 2.86; p < 0.0001). Liraglutide reduced systolic BP (-4.0 mmHg) vs glargine (+0.5 mmHg; -4.5 mmHg difference, 95% CI 6.8, -2.2; p = 0.0001) but not vs placebo (p = 0.0791). Rates of hypoglycaemic episodes (major, minor and symptoms only, respectively) were 0.06, 1.2 and 1.0 events/patient/year, respectively, in the liraglutide group (vs 0, 1.3, 1.8 and 0, 1.0, 0.5 with glargine and placebo, respectively). A slightly higher number of adverse events (including nausea at 14%) were reported with liraglutide, but only 9.8% of participants in the group receiving liraglutide developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.
                Liraglutide added to metformin and sulfonylurea produced significant improvement in glycaemic control and bodyweight compared with placebo and insulin glargine. The difference vs insulin glargine in HbA(1c) was within the predefined non-inferiority margin.
                ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00331851.
                The study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S. To compare results obtained with metformin versus those obtained with DNA-recombinant insulin in obese patients with NIDDM suffering from secondary failure to sulfonylureas.
                We conducted an open, prospective, randomized, and comparative study comprising a total of 60 patients selected and placed in two parallel groups. We had previously confirmed that the subjects had secondary failure to high doses of sulfonylureas. The initial metformin dosage was a single 850 mg tablet, and the dosage was increased to two or three tablets depending on the patient's metabolic changes. The initial dosage of DNA-recombinant insulin was 24 U, subcutaneously administered and divided into two portions: two-thirds at around 8:00 A.M., before breakfast, and the remaining third at 8:00 P.M., before dinner. The dosage was adjusted based on the patient's clinical and metabolic response.
                The initial average glucose value for the metformin group was 269.1 +/- 32.2 mg/dl, decreasing by the end of the study to 159.7 +/- 30.5 mg/dl. For the insulin group, these figures went from 270.7 +/- 24.0 mg/dl at the beginning of the study to 134.8 +/- 26.7 mg/dl. This decrease correlates with the reduction in glycosylated hemoglobin from 12.8 to 8.9% for the first group and from 12.3 to 8.2% for the second, as well as with the reduction in triglyceride values from 230.3 to 183.1 mg/dl and from 218.4 to 186.3 mg/dl, respectively. The BMI (27.5-26.4), blood pressure (systolic from 145.7-132.1 mmHg, diastolic from 90.3-84.8 mmHg), and total cholesterol levels (235-202 mg/dl) decreased in only the metformin group.
                Metformin is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment that improves metabolic control and favorably modifies secondary clinical alterations due to insulin resistance, such as arterial hypertension, overweight, and hyperlipidemia, in obese patients with NIDDM suffering from secondary failure to sulfonylureas. In a randomized double-blind cross-over study the efficacy, metabolic effects, and acceptability of metformin were compared with tolbutamide in 20 diabetic patients aged between 65 and 95 years. No significant differences were noted after treatment in blood glucose control (fasting plasma glucose, metformin 9.1 +/- 2.8 mmol l-1, tolbutamide 8.3 +/- 2.8 mmol l-1; mean change, metformin +1.1 mmol l-1, tolbutamide +0.02 mmol l-1, p = 0.215), domiciliary blood glucose control, fasting insulin, lactate, cholesterol or triglyceride levels. There was a significant difference in weight change between the two treatments (on metformin -2.0 kg, from 63.2 +/- 11.8 to 61.2 +/- 12.3; on tolbutamide, +1.6 kg, from 61.4 +/- 11.1 to 63.0 +/- 12.3; p = 0.001). Initial gastro-intestinal side-effects occurred in 30% of patients with metformin. These were transient and responded to temporary reduction in treatment dosage. Metformin could not be distinguished from tolbutamide in elderly diabetic patients, except in that it was associated with weight loss. The data regarding comparison of efficacy of metformin with glimepiride, newest Sulfonylurea, or with the use of both drugs in combination with insulin is rare in the literature. Therefore, we assessed the daily insulin dose, hypoglycemic events and body weight on achieving desirable glycemic control after addition of insulin, to glimepiride 8 mg and/or metformin 2500 mg, in subjects with type 2 DM manifesting lapse of glycemic control.
                S.C. insulin Novolog Mix [70/30], pre-supper was initiated in 12 subjects on metformin, 14 subjects on glimepiride, and 12 subjects receiving both drugs, with HbA1C > 7.5% and eight subjects receiving placebo. Insulin dose was increased by 4 U at weekly interval until fasting blood sugar [FBS] between 6.6 and 8 mM/l was attained and then further titrated by 2 U every week to attain and maintain FBS between 4.5 and 6.7 mM/l over the next 4 months. The comparisons were conducted between these groups for HbA1C, the daily insulin dose, body weight noted at the end of this study period as well as the hypoglycemic episodes per patient during the last 4 weeks of the study period.
                HbA1C levels were < 7.0% in all subjects at the end of the study. The daily insulin dose (units), total and per kg/BW was significantly lower [p < 0.001] with metformin (51 +/- 5, 0.51 +/- 0.10), glimepiride (40 +/- 4, 0.42 +/- 0.09) as well as with both drugs (23 +/- 7, 0.21 +/- 0.07) in comparison to placebo (82 +/- 10, 0.82 +/- 0.12). The insulin dose was also significantly lower [p < 0.05] in subjects on both drugs than subjects receiving them individually. Weight gain was less [p < 0.001] with metformin [2.5 +/- 0.74 kg], glimepiride [2.3 +/- 0.7 kg], and both drugs [2.2 +/- 0.61 kg] in comparison to placebo [5.2 +/- 1.4 kg] whereas the hypoglycemic episodes were lesser with metformin (3.8 +/- 1.2) and glimepiride (3.3 +/- 0.9) and least with both drugs (2.5 +/- 0.6) in comparison to placebo (5.2 +/- 1.0).
                Glimepiride and metformin are effective individually in achieving a glycemic goal with a less daily insulin dose, weight gain, and hypoglycemic episodes in comparison to insulin monotherapy in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus with further marked reduction in these parameters when used concurrently. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of glimepiride and pioglitazone on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes already on metformin.
                Twenty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes already on metformin, without known cardiovascular disease, were randomized in 2 groups; glimepiride (4 mg od) was added in group A (n=14) and pioglitazone (30 mg od) in group B (n=14) for 6 months. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in the brachial artery was assessed in all patients, at baseline and at follow-up.
                The 2 groups did not differ in age (mean+/-S.D., 63.6+/-7.3 years vs 62.8+/-7.2 years respectively), or any measured variable at baseline. Fasting glucose and glycated haemoglobin improved similarly in both groups. There were significant differences between the 2 groups in the absolute changes observed at follow-up in waist circumference, +1.86+/-3.11 cm vs -1.86+/-1.88 cm in groups A and B respectively; fasting insulin levels, +14.79+/-12.56 pmol/L vs -25.84+/-28.09 pmol/L; homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), +0.66+/-1.01 vs -1.83+/-1.38; HDL cholesterol levels, -0.07+/-0.22 mmol/L vs +0.14+/-0.20 mmol/L and FMD, +0.14+/-1.09% vs +2.02+/-2.05% (p<0.05 for all). The only independent predictor factor of the FMD improvement was treatment-induced changes in HOMA (R(2): 0.488, slope: -0.782, [95% CI: -1.128, -0.436], p=0.0001).
                In patients with type 2 diabetes already on metformin, addition of pioglitazone as compared to glimepiride, improved endothelial function despite similar glycemic control. The improvement in endothelial function was mainly due to a reduction in insulin resistance. The ability of the incretin mimetic exenatide to improve glycaemic control and reduce body weight was assessed over 82 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycaemic control with maximally effective doses of metformin.
                In this interim 82-week analysis, 150 (total cohort) of an eligible population of 183 patients opted to continue exenatide treatment in an uncontrolled open-label extension of a 30-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Of these, 92 patients (completer cohort) achieved 82 weeks of exenatide therapy. Patients continued metformin throughout the study.
                At the end of the placebo-controlled trial, exenatide resulted in an haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction from baseline of -1.0 +/- 0.1% (mean +/- SE) (exenatide treatment arms), with durable HbA1c reductions after 82 weeks of -1.3 +/- 0.1%. The percent of patients who achieved HbA1c < or = 7% at weeks 30 and 82 was 46 and 59% respectively. After 30 weeks, exenatide caused a reduction in weight from baseline of -3.0 +/- 0.6 kg, with a progressive reduction in weight of -5.3 +/- 0.8 kg after 82 weeks. In addition, exenatide treatment produced clinically significant improvements in cardiovascular risk factors after 82 weeks. The most frequent adverse event after 30 and 82 weeks of exenatide was nausea, which was generally of mild-or-moderate intensity. It decreased in incidence after initiation in the controlled trial and the uncontrolled open-label extension. Hypoglycaemia was rare, with no severe events.
                Exenatide was generally well tolerated, producing a durable reduction in HbA1c and a progressive reduction in weight over 82 weeks in patients with type 2 diabetes failing to achieve glycaemic control with metformin. The effect of metformin on glucose metabolism was examined in eight obese (percent ideal body weight, 151 +/- 9%) and six lean (percent ideal body weight, 104 +/- 4%) noninsulin-dependent diabetic (NIDD) subjects before and after 3 months of metformin treatment (2.5 g/day). Fasting plasma glucose (11.5-8.8 mmol/L), hemoglobin-A1c (9.8-7.7%), oral glucose tolerance test response (20.0-17.0 mmol/L; peak glucose), total cholesterol (5.67-4.71 mmol/L), and triglycerides (2.77-1.52 mmol/L) uniformly decreased (P less than 0.05-0.001) after metformin treatment; fasting plasma lactate increased slightly from baseline (1.4 to 1.7 mmol/L; P = NS). Body weight decreased by 5 kg in obese NIDD subjects, but remained constant in lean NIDD. Basal hepatic glucose production declined in all diabetics from 83 to 61 mg/m2.min (P less than 0.01), and the decrease correlated (r = 0.80; P less than 0.01) closely with the fall in fasting glucose concentration. Fasting insulin (115 to 79 pmol/L) declined (P less than 0.05) after metformin. During a 6.9 mmol/L hyperglycemic clamp, glucose uptake increased in every NIDD subject (113 +/- 15 to 141 +/- 12 mg/m2.min; P less than 0.001) without a change in the plasma insulin response. During a euglycemic insulin clamp, total glucose uptake rose in obese NIDD subjects (121 +/- 10 to 146 +/- 9 mmol/m2.min; P less than 0.05), but decreased slightly in lean NIDD (121 +/- 10 to 146 +/- 0.5; P = NS). Hepatic glucose production was suppressed by more than 80-90% in all insulin clamp studies before and after metformin treatment. In conclusion, metformin lowers the fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, improves oral glucose tolerance, and decreases plasma lipid levels independent of changes in body weight. The improvement in fasting glucose results from a reduction in basal hepatic glucose production. Metformin per se does not enhance tissue sensitivity to insulin in NIDD subjects. The improvement in glucose metabolism under hyperglycemic, but not euglycemic, conditions suggests that metformin augments glucose-mediated glucose uptake. Metformin has no stimulatory effect on insulin secretion. Sulfonylurea drugs have been the only oral therapy available for patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) in the United States. Recently, however, metformin has been approved for the treatment of NIDDM.
                We performed two large, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, controlled studies in which metformin or another treatment was given for 29 weeks to moderately obese patients with NIDDM whose diabetes was inadequately controlled by diet (protocol 1: metformin vs. placebo; 289 patients), or diet plus glyburide (protocol 2: metformin and glyburide vs. metformin vs. glyburide; 632 patients). To determine efficacy we measured plasma glucose (while the patients were fasting and after the oral administration of glucose), lactate, lipids, insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin before, during, and at the end of the study.
                In protocol 1, at the end of the study the 143 patients in the metformin group, as compared with the 146 patients in the placebo group, had lower mean (+/- SE) fasting plasma glucose concentrations (189 +/- 5 vs. 244 +/- 6 mg per deciliter [10.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 13.7 +/- 0.3 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.6 +/- 0.2 percent, P < 0.001). In protocol 2, the 213 patients given metformin and glyburide, as compared with the 210 patients treated with glyburide alone, had lower mean fasting plasma glucose concentrations (187 +/- 4 vs. 261 +/- 4 mg per deciliter [10.5 +/- 0.2 vs. 14.6 +/- 0.2 mmol per liter], P < 0.001) and glycosylated hemoglobin values (7.1 +/- 0.1 percent vs. 8.7 +/- 0.1 percent, P < 0.001). The effect of metformin alone was similar to that of glyburide alone. Eighteen percent of the patients given metformin and glyburide had symptoms compatible with hypoglycemia, as compared with 3 percent in the glyburide group and 2 percent in the metformin group. In both protocols the patients given metformin had statistically significant decreases in plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, whereas the values in the respective control groups did not change. There were no significant changes in fasting plasma lactate concentrations in any of the groups.
                Metformin monotherapy and combination therapy with metformin and sulfonylurea are well tolerated and improve glycemic control and lipid concentrations in patients with NIDDM whose diabetes is poorly controlled with diet or sulfonylurea therapy alone. Circulating visfatin levels are altered in insulin resistant states. We evaluated the effects of two insulin-sensitizing hypoglycemic agents on plasma visfatin and adiponectin levels in patients with newly diagnosed and untreated type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                Forty-four patients with T2DM were randomized to treatment either with pioglitazone (15-45mg/day) or metformin (1000-2000mg/day). Plasma visfatin and adiponectin levels and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) scores were determined at baseline and at 12th week of treatment.
                By the end of the 12th week, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, HOMA-IR scores and waist circumferences improved equally in both treatment arms. HDL cholesterol and adiponectin levels increased only in the pioglitazone group (p=0.01 and p=0.003, respectively). On the other hand, metformin treatment had additional regulatory effects on BMI, blood pressure and total and LDL-cholesterol levels (p=0.002, p=0.01, p=0.004, p=0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Neither pioglitazone nor metformin displayed a significant effect on circulating visfatin concentration.
                Despite improvements in insulin sensitivity and glycemic regulation, either pioglitazone or metformin treatment did not result in any effect on blood visfatin levels in patients with treatment naïve T2DM. Metformin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 1995 subject to the conduct of a randomized trial to evaluate the risk of lactic acidosis or other serious adverse events (SAEs) with this agent, under usual care conditions.
                The Comparative Outcomes Study of Metformin Intervention versus Conventional (COSMIC) Approach Study was a randomized, open-label, active-comparator, parallel-group, 1-year trial in type 2 diabetic patients suboptimally controlled on diet or sulfonylurea. Patients received metformin (n = 7,227) or other usual care treatments (n = 1,505). The primary end point was the incidence of SAEs, death, and hospitalization.
                SAEs occurred in 10.3% (95% CI 9.6-11.1%) of the metformin group and in 11.0% (9.5-12.7%) of the usual care group (P = 0.431). Lactic acidosis did not occur. All-cause mortality (1.1% [0.9-1.4%] vs. 1.3% [0.8-2.0%], P = 0.596) and hospitalization (9.4% [8.8-10.1%] vs. 10.4% [8.9-12.1%], P = 0.229) were similar between groups.
                The incidence of SAEs was similar between groups. Lactic acidosis was not observed. Metformin may be safely prescribed for type 2 diabetes if contraindications and warnings are respected. This study demonstrates the utility of large, simple trials for risk evaluation of treatments for common diseases. To compare long-term efficacy and safety of nateglinide plus metformin with those of gliclazide plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with metformin monotherapy.
                Double-blind, double-dummy, multicentre study extended to a total of 52 weeks. Patients with inadequate glucose control on maximal doses of metformin were randomized to nateglinide (N = 133) or gliclazide (N = 129) add-on treatment. After the initial 6-month study, the majority of patients in the nateglinide group [n = 112 (93.3%)] and in the gliclazide group [n = 101 (92.7%)] entered a 6-month, double-blind, extension study.
                There was no significant difference between treatment regimens in haemoglobin Alc (HbA1c) change from baseline to 52 weeks (-0.14% for nateglinide vs. -0.27% for gliclazide; p = 0.396). Proportions of patients achieving an endpoint HbA1c of <7% were similar (40 vs. 47.4%) for nateglinide and gliclazide groups. There was no significant between-treatment difference in fasting plasma glucose change from baseline to 52 weeks (nateglinide: -0.2 mmol/l and gliclazide: -0.7 mmol/l; p = 0.096). The decreases in prandial plasma glucose area under the curve(0-4 h) from baseline were -3.26 and -1.86 h x mmol/l in the nateglinide and the gliclazide groups respectively, and the change was statistically significant in the nateglinide group only (p = 0.006). Initial insulin response to a meal was augmented with nateglinide treatment only, without between-treatment difference in 2-h insulin response. The overall rate of hypoglycaemic events was similar with nateglinide and gliclazide combinations with metformin. Nateglinide plus metformin treatment was not associated with weight gain.
                No significant difference was seen between nateglinide plus metformin and gliclazide plus metformin in terms of HbA1c. Treatment with nateglinide plus metformin for up to 12 months was not associated with weight gain. As diabetes is in part an inflammatory condition, the initiation of insulin and/or metformin may beneficially reduce levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).
                To determine whether insulin alone or combined with metformin lowers levels of hsCRP, IL-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFr2) in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                Randomized 2 x 2 factorial trial of open-label insulin glargine and placebo-controlled metformin in 500 adults with type 2 diabetes (median time from diagnosis, 2.0 years), suboptimal glycemic control, and elevated hsCRP levels. Patients were recruited from US office-based practices between October 2006 and December 2008.
                Random allocation to 1 of 4 treatments (placebo metformin only, placebo metformin and insulin glargine, active metformin only, or active metformin and insulin glargine) with dose titration targeting fasting blood glucose less than 110 mg/dL.
                Change in hsCRP level (primary end point) and change in IL-6 and sTNFr2 levels (secondary end points) from baseline to 14 weeks.
                Levels of glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were significantly reduced with active treatment vs placebo (all P values <.001). Levels of hsCRP were reduced in all 4 groups. There was no significant difference in hsCRP reduction among those allocated to insulin (-11.8%; 95% CI, -18.7% to -4.4%) or to no insulin (-17.5%; 95% CI, -23.9% to -10.5%) (P for difference = .25), or among those allocated to active metformin (-18.1%; 95% CI, -24.4% to -11.1%) or placebo metformin (-11.2%; 95% CI, -18.1% to -3.7%) (P for difference = .17). In the individual treatment groups, despite a differential impact on glucose control, reductions in hsCRP in the metformin (-16.1%; 95% CI, -25.1% to -6.1%) and metformin plus insulin (-20.1%; 95% CI, -28.8% to -10.4%) groups were no different than reductions with placebo alone (-19.0%; 95% CI, -27.8% to -9.1%; P = .67 and .87 vs placebo, respectively). By contrast, hsCRP reduction was attenuated with insulin alone (-2.9%, 95% CI, -13.2% to 8.6%; P = .03 vs placebo). Similar findings were noted for levels of IL-6 and sTNFr2.
                In patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, treatment with insulin or metformin compared with placebo did not reduce inflammatory biomarker levels despite improving glucose control.
                clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00366301. We investigated whether metformin hydrochloride has sustained beneficial metabolic and (cardio) vascular effects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).
                We studied 390 patients treated with insulin in the outpatient clinics of 3 hospitals in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with a follow-up period of 4.3 years. Either metformin hydrochloride, 850 mg, or placebo (1-3 times daily) was added to insulin therapy. The primary end point was an aggregate of microvascular and macrovascular morbidity and mortality. The secondary end points were microvascular and macrovascular morbidity and mortality, as separate aggregate scores. In addition, effects on hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), insulin requirement, lipid levels, blood pressure, body weight, and body mass index were analyzed.
                Metformin treatment prevented weight gain (mean weight gain, -3.07 kg [range, -3.85 to -2.28 kg]; P < .001), improved glycemic control (mean reduction in HbA(1c) level, 0.4% percentage point [95% CI, 0.55-0.25]; P < .001) (where CI indicates confidence interval), despite the aim of similar glycemic control in both groups, and reduced insulin requirements (mean reduction, 19.63 IU/d [95% CI, 24.91-14.36 IU/d]; P < .001). Metformin was not associated with an improvement in the primary end point. It was, however, associated with an improvement in the secondary, macrovascular end point (hazard ratio, 0.61 (95% CI, 0.40-0.94; P = .02), which was partly explained by the difference in weight. The number needed to treat to prevent 1 macrovascular end point was 16.1 (95% CI, 9.2-66.6).
                Metformin, added to insulin in patients with DM2, improved body weight, glycemic control, and insulin requirements but did not improve the primary end point. Metformin did, however, reduce the risk of macrovascular disease after a follow-up period of 4.3 years. These sustained beneficial effects support the policy to continue metformin treatment after the introduction of insulin in any patient with DM2, unless contraindicated. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00375388. To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with pioglitazone and metformin in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
                During a 12-week observation period 236 patients were treated with metformin 500 or 750 mg/day. 169 patients with a confirmed HbA(1c) level >or= 6.5% were randomized (stratified according to metformin dosage) to receive pioglitazone 15 mg/day for 12 weeks then increased to 30 mg/day for a further 16 weeks (n = 83), or placebo (n = 86). Outcome measures included HbA(1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), percentage of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 6.5%, lipid profile, and other metabolic parameters.
                Mean HbA(1c) was reduced by 0.67% in patients receiving pioglitazone plus metformin versus an increase of 0.25% in those receiving metformin alone (p < 0.0001). After 8 weeks' treatment and until the end of the study, HbA(1c) was significantly lower with pioglitazone plus metformin and more patients in this group achieved an HbA(1c) < 6.5% (38.6% vs. 8.1%; p < 0.0001). FBG was also reduced by a significantly greater amount in patients receiving pioglitazone plus metformin compared with metformin monotherapy (-20.5 vs. 1.9 mg/dl; p < 0.0001). Combination therapy was associated with significantly increased HDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol, and adiponectin, and significantly decreased levels of fasting insulin, free fatty acids, and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMA-R) compared with metformin monotherapy. Overall, combination therapy and monotherapy were equally well tolerated and the incidence of adverse effects 'possibly' related to therapy was 15.7% and 11.6% (p = 0.505), respectively. Edema occurred slightly more often in the combination group (6.0 vs. 1.2%).
                Pioglitazone plus metformin significantly improved glycemic control (HbA(1c) and FBG), and markers associated with increased insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk compared with metformin monotherapy.
                UMIN 000001110. The treatment of Type II diabetes (NIDDM) includes an appropriate diet and prudent exercise program. If these measures are insufficient to control the blood sugar, oral agents (sulphonylureas or biguanides) or insulin are added to the therapeutic regimen. Although the diet prescription has undergone some changes and refinements, this approach has been the traditional treatment for NIDDM for nearly 40 years. Recently a new class of oral agents, the alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, has become available. These drugs are competitive inhibitors of the alpha-glucosidase enzymes in the brush border of the bowel wall. They act to slow and delay the rate of carbohydrate absorption, thereby decreasing postprandial hyperglycemia. A recent study was designed to evaluate the long-term efficacy of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, in improving the glycemic control of patients with NIDDM who were sub-optimally controlled on either diet alone, or diet plus sulphonylurea, metformin or insulin. A total of 354 patients with NIDDM were studied, 77 on diet alone, 83 on metformin, 103 and sulphonylurea and 91 on insulin. Subjects in each treatment stratum were randomized, double-blind to either acarbose or placebo, for 1 year. At baseline and every 3 months thereafter, fasting and postprandial glucose and C-peptide, HbA1c and fasting lipids were measured. Compared to placebo, acarbose treatment resulted in a decrease in mean postprandial glucose in all four strata (19 +/- 0.8 to 15.3 +/- 0.7 mmol/l: P < 0.001). This effect was even more pronounced and highly statistically significantly different when comparing the postprandial plasma glucose incremental area under the curve between placebo and acarbose treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To compare combination use of repaglinide, metformin and bedtime Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin with conventional approaches of insulin initiation in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM).
                Eighty-two patients with T2DM with suboptimal glycaemic control on oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized to one of three treatment regimens for 4 months. Group 1 received metformin and twice daily biphasic 30/70 human insulin mixture (n = 27), group 2 metformin and bedtime NPH insulin (n = 26) and group 3 metformin, bedtime NPH insulin and mealtime repaglinide (n = 25).
                Seventy-five patients completed the study. Baseline and end-point mean HbA1c levels fell from 9.0 +/- 1.1 to 7.9 +/- 1.1% in group 1, 10.0 +/- 2.2 to 9.2 +/- 1.4% group 2 and 10.0 +/- 1.7 to 8.1 +/- 1.5% in group 3, respectively. All groups showed improvements in HbA1c. There was no significant difference between groups in the proportions of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia (29.6, 25.0 and 16.7%, respectively; P = 0.55) or in mean weight gain (2.9, 0.7 and 2.2 kg, respectively; P = 0.06). By 4 months, insulin doses were 0.63 +/- 0.32 IU/kg in group 1, 0.58 +/- 0.21 IU/kg in group 2 and 0.37 +/- 0.22 IU/kg in group 3 (group 3 vs. groups 1 and 2: P < 0.002).
                The approach using repaglinide, metformin and NPH insulin improved glycaemic control with a similar safety profile to conventional insulin initiation in T2DM and produced final glycaemic control similar to metformin and a twice daily biphasic insulin mixture. We evaluated the effect of glimepiride plus metformin and rosiglitazone plus metformin on glucose, and on cardiovascular risk parameters such as lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) and homocysteine (HCT) in patients with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Ninety-nine patients in the multicentre, randomized, double-blind study took metformin (1500 mg/day) plus glimepiride (2 mg/day) or rosiglitazone (4 mg/day) for 12 months. Changes in body mass index, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), Lp(a) and HCT were primary efficacy variables. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG) and homeostasis model assessment index were also used to assess efficacy. On average, HbA1c decreased by 9.1% and 8.1%, FPG decreased by 7.3% and 10.9%, and PPG decreased by 7.6% and 10.5%, respectively, in the glimepiride and rosiglitazone groups after 12 months. Patients receiving rosiglitazone experienced more rapid improvement in glycaemic control than those on glimepiride, and showed a significant improvement in insulin resistance-related parameters. There was a statistically significant decrease in basal homocysteinaemia in glimepiride-treated patients (-27.3%), but not in rosiglitazone-treated patients. Rosiglitazone plus metformin significantly improved long-term control of insulin resistance-related parameters compared with glimepiride plus metformin, although glimepiride treatment was associated with a slight improvement in cholesterolaemia, not observed in the rosiglitazone-treated patients, and with significant improvements in non-traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease, such as basal homocysteinaemia and plasma Lp(a) levels. To determine whether metformin therapy can predispose patients with type 2 diabetes and normal renal function to lactic acidosis when certain conditions are present.
                We undertook this prospective cohort study in 110 consecutive patients (age range, 27 to 85 years) with normal serum creatinine levels (<1.5 mg/dL in men; <1.4 mg/dL in women), receiving metformin as monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylurea or insulin, who were undergoing assessment on a regular basis for diabetes care. Clinical evaluations were performed at 4- to 12-week intervals for up to 2 years. Serum electrolytes and creatinine as well as plasma lactic acid determinations were done in all patients, regardless of symptoms. The anion gap was calculated.
                Plasma lactic acid concentrations were normal in 47 patients (mean, 9.4 +/- 18.0 mg/dL or 1.053 +/- 0.194 mmol/L) and high in 63 patients (19.63 +/- 5.11 mg/dL or 2.208 +/- 0.569 mmol/L; P<0.001). The anion gap was increased in the high lactic acid group in comparison with the normal group (P<0.001). Comorbid conditions (for example, cardiovascular or respiratory disease) that may predispose to hypoxemia or compromise tissue perfusion were significantly more prevalent in patients in the high lactic acid group than in those with normal lactic acid values.
                Lacticacidemia may occur in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have normal renal function. An increased anion gap and certain clinical symptoms may serve as clues for the presence of lacticacidemia. Progression from lacticacidemia to clinical lactic acidosis, under certain hemodynamic or respiratory adverse conditions, remains conjectural and needs further evaluation. To evaluate the effect on coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters and on non-conventional cardiovascular risk factors of metformin plus nateglinide or glibenclamide in naïve type 2 diabetes patients.
                A total of 248 type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive nateglinide or glibenclamide, and metformin for 12 months. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), postprandial plasma insulin (PPI), homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA index), lipid profile with lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], fibrinogen (Fg), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), homocysteine (Hcy), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP).
                After 9 months of treatment, both tested drug combinations were similarly associated with a significant reduction in FPG (nateglinide, -17.2%; glibenclamide, -16.9%, both p<0.05) compared to the baseline, while HbA1c (-17.3%, p<0.05) and PPG (-15.2%, p<0.05) significantly decreased only in the nateglinide group. After one year of treatment, compared to the baseline the nateglinide group showed a significant reduction in HbA1c (-21%, p<0.01), FPG (-20.7%), p<0.01, PPG (-21.5%, p<0.05), HOMA index (-25.4%, p<0.05); the glibenclamide group, showed a significant reduction in HbA1c (-11%, p<0.05), FPG (-23.2%, p<0.05), PPG (-11.2%, p<0.05), and HOMA index (-23.9%, p<0.05) but to a minor extent. Moreover, the HbA1c difference value from baseline observed in the nateglinide-treated group was significantly higher than that observed in the glibenclamide group. Therefore the nateglinide-treated patients showed a significant reduction in some prothrombotic parameters (PAI-1=-19%, Lp(a)=-31%, and Hcy=-32.3%, all p<0.05), whereas the glibenclamide-treated patients did not.
                Nateglinide appears to improve glycemic control as well as the levels of some prothrombotic parameters compared to glibenclamide when administered in combination with metformin. Few studies have directly compared rosiglitazone and metformin effects on adipocytokines. The aim was to observe the possible effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, plasma leptin (pL), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and resistin (R) in overweight and obese diabetic patients intolerant to metformin.
                Six hundred and ninety-four consecutive overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients were evaluated and 56 patients were intolerant to metformin at maximum dosage. We added rosiglitazone to metformin in these intolerant patients (RM) and we compared them with 61 patients treated with metformin (M) in a single-blind placebo-controlled trial. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), pL, ADN, TNF-alpha, and R at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Furthermore, we calculated insulin resistance index (HOMA-index) using FPG and FPI.
                Glycated hemoglobin, FPG, FPI, and HOMA-index results were lower than baseline values in RM and M groups. Glycated hemoglobin and HOMA-index values were significantly lower in RM group compared to M group at 6 months. Plasma leptin, ADN, TNF-alpha, and R were significantly improved in RM group compared to M group at 6 months.
                No BMI change was observed, probably because rosiglitazone was added to metformin, that could mitigate the body increase of rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone improved glycemic control and insulin resistance-correlated parameters when added to intolerant metformin patients. These data suggest that rosiglitazone may be the drug of choice for the treatment of overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients. Efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30, 30% short-acting and 70% intermediate-acting insulin aspart) added to an optimized treatment of metformin and pioglitazone (met/pio) were compared with treatment with optimized met/pio in type 2 diabetes patients.
                This randomized, 34-week, parallel-group study enrolled insulin-naive, type 2 diabetes patients (HbA(1c) 7.5-12.0%) previously using two oral antidiabetic (OAD) agents. During an 8-week run-in period, treatment was changed to met/pio and doses were adjusted up to 2500 mg/day and 30 or 45 mg/day respectively. Subjects either continued met/pio alone or added BIAsp 30 initiated at 6 units twice daily and titrated to target plasma glucose (PG) (4.4-6.1 mmol/l).
                At end-of-study, subjects treated with BIAsp 30+met/pio (n = 93) had a mean (+/-s.d.) HbA(1c) reduction significantly greater than treatment with met/pio (n = 88) (1.5% +/- 1.1 vs. 0.2% +/- 0.9, p < 0.0001 between groups). Subjects treated with BIAsp 30+met/pio were more likely to reach The American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and European Association for the Study of Diabetes/American Diabetes Association HbA(1c) targets of < or =6.5 and <7.0%, respectively, than with met/pio only (HbA(1c)< or =6.5%: 59 vs. 12%; HbA(1c) <7.0%: 76 vs. 24%). At end-of-study, self-monitored glucose profile values at all eight daily time points were significantly less for the BIAsp 30+met/pio group compared with the met/pio group, and minor hypoglycaemia (defined as PG < 3.1 mmol/l) was more frequent (8.3 vs. 0.1 events/year, p < 0.001). Both groups gained weight during treatment (BIAsp 30+met/pio, 4.6 +/- 4.3 kg; met/pio, 0.8 +/- 3.2 kg; p < 0.001).
                Addition of insulin in type 2 patients treated with met/pio is an effective way to achieve glycaemic targets. Treatment with BIAsp 30+met/pio achieved significantly greater reduction in HbA(1c), as compared with met/pio alone. In patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by 2 OADs, more achieved glycaemic targets using BIAsp 30+met/pio than using met/pio alone. a)To determine serum Transforming Growth Factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) levels in patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have diabetes related complications and in healthy controls, b) to evaluate the effects of metformin and rosiglitazone on TGF-beta 1 levels.
                In the washout period, 61 patients with Fasting Plasma Glucose levels (FPG) higher than 140 mg/dl, Postprandial Glucose (PPG) levels higher than 180 mg/dl and A1c levels exceeding 6.5% were treated with glimperide. After 4 weeks, 39 of these patients were randomised to receive either metformin or rosiglitazone for 12 weeks. Thirty healthy controls were also studied.
                There were no significant differences with regard to age, gender, body weight and BMI between patients and healthy controls. Type 2 diabetics had higher waist circumference, FPG, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Baseline TGF-beta 1 levels in diabetics were higher than in controls (29.84+/-7.04 ng/ml vs 11.37+/-4.06 ng/ml, p<0.001). Metformin or rosiglitazone did not significantly modify the TGF-beta 1 levels. In a multiple regression analysis FPG was the only variable that was significantly associated with plasma TGF-beta 1 levels.
                The elevated levels of TGF-beta 1 in subjects with type 2 diabetes possibly indicate a tendency for renal and endothelial damage in such patients. The association of TGF-beta 1 with FPG possibly links poor diabetic control to vascular damage, leading to diabetic complications. Lack of changes in the levels of TGF-beta 1 after therapy may reflect inadequate therapy duration. Since metformin improves insulin sensitivity, it has been indicated for patients with diabetes and hypertension, which are insulin-resistant conditions. In contrast to its well-known effects on carbohydrate metabolism, its potential for reducing blood pressure (BP) and its effect on leptin levels have been investigated less frequently.
                A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was carried out with 26 overweight diabetic subjects with mild-to-moderate hypertension to assess the effects of metformin-induced glycaemic control on BP and metabolic parameters. After a 4-week placebo period, when BP was stabilized by calcium channel blockers, they received either metformin (MG) or placebo (PG) for 12 weeks.
                Neither group showed any change in weight throughout the study. Only metformin-treated patients reduced fasting plasma glucose (8.54 + 1.72 to 7.54 + 1.33 mmol/l, p < 0.05), although HbA(1c) had decreased in both groups (PG: 6.7+/-3.0 to 5.9+/-2.6%; MG: 5.3+/-1.5 to 4.6+/-0.9%; p < 0.05). The initial office mean BPs were similar and decreased at the end of the treatment period in both groups, reaching statistical significance only in MG (105.7+/-8.0 to 99.2+/-9.3 mmHg, p < 0.05). No difference was observed when comparing baseline and final values obtained by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring. Metformin induced a reduction in both insulinaemia (71.0+/-62.4 to 38.0+/-23.0 pmol/l, p < 0.05) and the insulin resistance index (3.5+/-2.7 to 1.8+/-1.0, p < 0.05). The two groups had similar baseline leptin levels which remained unchanged after treatment (PG: 16.8+/-7.9 to 21.4+/-14.6 microg/l; MG: 18.5+/-10.3 to 18.4+/-8.9 microg/l). Dopamine levels increased significantly only in metformin-treated subjects.
                Reductions in both the insulin levels and the resistance index reinforced metformin capacity to improve peripheral sensitivity. Moreover, such benefits were not accompanied by any hypotensive effects. Since leptin levels were affected neither by metformin per se nor by the induced insulinaemia reduction, our data support the role of body weight as the major determinant of circulating leptin levels. To investigate the efficacy and safety of topiramate in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin.
                This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All subjects received a non-pharmacological program of diet, exercise and behavioral modification throughout the study; the assigned diet was 600 kcal/day less than the subject's individually calculated energy expenditure. After a 6-week single-blind placebo run-in, subjects were randomized to placebo, topiramate 96 mg/day or topiramate 192 mg/day. Following an 8-week titration period, subjects remained on their assigned dose for 52 weeks. However, the sponsor ended the study early in order to develop a new controlled-release formulation with the potential to enhance tolerability and simplify dosing in this patient population. A total of 646 obese men and women (age: 18-75 years, body mass index: 27-50 kg/m(2)) with an established history of type 2 diabetes mellitus controlled by metformin monotherapy were randomized. Efficacy was assessed in a pre-determined modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population of 307 subjects whose randomization date would have allowed them to complete 24 weeks on study medication before the announcement of study termination.
                Joint primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in weight and change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 24.
                Subjects in the placebo, topiramate 96 mg/day and topiramate 192 mg/day groups lost 1.7%, 4.5% (P<0.001) and 6.5% (P<0.001), respectively, of their baseline body weight and had absolute decreases in HbA(1c) of 0.1%, 0.4% (P<0.001) and 0.6% (P<0.001) (MITT, last observation carried forward). Topiramate-treated subjects also experienced statistically significant decreases in systolic blood pressure. Most common adverse events were paresthesia and events related to the central nervous system.
                Topiramate was effective for weight reduction and improvement in glycemic control in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin monotherapy. Further study in obese diabetics is warranted. nan Metformin may affect the risk of atherothrombotic disease. However, metformin increases levels of homocysteine (Hcy), considered an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis. We evaluate whether homocysteine-lowering has a beneficial effect on arterial elasticity and metabolic parameters in metformin-treated diabetic patients. In double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 60 diabetic patients treated with high dose of metformin were randomly assigned to receive daily oral supplementation with folate (1000 mcg), vitamins B12 (400 mcg) and B6 (10mg) (group 1) or placebo (group 2). Lipid profile, HbA1C, insulin, C-peptide, hs-CRP, vitamin B12, folic acid, homocysteine, endothelin, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) were measured. Arterial elasticity was evaluated using pulse wave contour analysis (HDI CR 2000, Eagan, MN). The two groups were similar at baseline in terms of hemodynamic and arterial elasticity parameters. After a 4-month small artery elasticity index (SAEI) was significantly greater in patients who received Hcy-lowering agents than in the placebo group: 4.3+/-2.04 ml/mm Hg x 100 versus 3.2+/-1.1 ml/mm Hg x 100, p=0.01. Post-treatment vitamin B12 and folic acid levels were greater in group 1 versus group 2: 738.1+/-279.9 pg/ml versus 566.1+/-167.4 pg/ml, p=0.007 and 14.9+/-4.8 ng/ml versus 8.3+/-2.9 ng/ml, p<0.0001, respectively. Hcy level decreased significantly in the treatment group from 10.0+/-4.4 to 7.6+/-2.5 micromol/l, p=0.002 and did not change in placebo group (p=0.9). Hcy-lowering therapy improved small arterial elasticity in diabetic patients treated with high dose of metformin. The improvement was associated with a decrease in Hcy as well as an increase in folic acid and vitamin B12. These findings suggest that Hcy-lowering may have beneficial vascular effect in metformin-treated diabetic patients. Metformin and rosiglitazone both improve glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, however may possess different anti-inflammatory and anti-atherosclerotic properties. We investigated the effects of these medications on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) to determine their relative potential to reduce cardiovascular risk independent of their antihyperglycemic actions.
                Ninety-two subjects with suboptimally controlled diabetes mellitus (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] >7.0%) were assigned to therapy with either rosiglitazone 4 mg once daily or metformin 850 mg twice daily for 24 weeks. The primary end point was the change in hsCRP after 24 weeks. The change in CIMT was prespecified as a secondary end point.
                Metformin and rosiglitazone treatment led to similar significant improvements in glycemic control (HbA1c -1.08% in the rosiglitazone group and -1.18% in the metformin group, P = nonsignificant). High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels decreased by an average of 68% in the rosiglitazone group (5.99 +/- 0.88 to 1.91 +/- 0.28 mg/L, P < .001), compared with a nonsignificant 4% reduction in hsCRP with metformin (5.69 +/- 0.83 to 5.46 +/- 0.92 mg/L; P = nonsignificant). Maximal CIMT progressed in the metformin group (+0.084 +/- 0.038 mm), whereas regression of maximal CIMT was observed in the rosiglitazone group (-0.037 +/- 0.031 mm; P = .02 for the between group comparison). Similar changes were observed for mean CIMT. The change in hsCRP and maximal CIMT were related in a multivariable model controlling for changes in HbA1c and lipid parameters (r = .31; P = .01).
                Rosiglitazone, compared to metformin, induced a prompt and profound reduction in hsCRP levels independent of its effect on glycemia. This change was associated with regression of CIMT after 24 weeks. nan The short-term (2-12 weeks) antihyperglycaemic efficacy of metformin (M), glibenclamide (G), and their primary combination (MG) was assessed in a double-blind study including 165 unselected patients with Type 2 diabetes. Patients with diet failure were randomized to M, G or MG. The dose was titrated with a fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG) of < 6.7 mmol l-1 as the target, using at most six dose levels, the first three comprising increasing monotherapy (M or G) or low-dose primary combination (MGL), and the second three add-on therapies (M/G and G/M) and primary combination therapy escalated to high dose (MGH). Success rates were higher on MGL than on monotherapy. The difference in achieving acceptable control (FBG < or = 7.8 mmol 1(-1)) was 70% versus 51% (95% confidence interval 3-36%, p = 0.032). When the drugs were combined, a slightly greater FBG reduction (p = 0.026) was observed, at lower dosage (p = 0.013). The response could not be predicted from body weight, but depended upon initial FBG (p = 0.019) and meal-stimulated C-peptide (p = 0.007). FBG declined progressively with increasing doses of metformin, whereas glibenclamide exerted most of its effect at low dose. Primary combination therapy with metformin and sulphonylurea may be clinically useful. To compare effects of different oral hypoglycemic drugs as first-line therapy on lipoprotein subfractions in type 2 diabetes.
                Sixty overweight type 2 diabetic patients not on lipid-lowering therapy were randomized to metformin, pioglitazone, or gliclazide after a 3-month dietary run-in. Drug doses were uptitrated for 3 months to optimize glycemia and were kept fixed for a further 3 months. LDL subfractions (LDL(1), LDL(2), and LDL(3)) were prepared by density gradient ultracentrifugation at randomization and study end. Triglycerides, cholesterol, total protein, and phospholipids were measured and mass of subfractions calculated. HDL subfractions were prepared by precipitation. The primary end point was change in proportion of LDL as LDL(3).
                HbA(1c), triglycerides, glucose, and cholesterol were comparable across groups at baseline and over time. LDL(3) mass and the LDL(3)-to-LDL ratio fell with pioglitazone (LDL(3) mass 36.2 to 28.0 mg/dl, P < 0.01; LDL(3)-to-LDL 19.2:13.3%, P < 0.01) and metformin (42.7 to 31.5 mg/dl, P < 0.01; 21.3:16.2%, P < 0.01, respectively) with no change on gliclazide. LDL(3) reductions were associated with reciprocal LDL(1) increases. Changes were independent of BMI, glycemic control, and triglycerides. Total HDL cholesterol increased on pioglitazone (1.28 to 1.36 mmol/l, P = 0.02) but not gliclazide (1.39 to 1.37 mmol/l, P = NS) or metformin (1.26 to 1.18 mmol/l, P = NS), largely due to an HDL(2) increase (0.3 to 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.05). HDL(3) cholesterol fell on metformin (0.9 to 0.85 mmol/l, P < 0.01). On pioglitazone and metformin, the HDL(2)-to-HDL(3) ratio increased compared with no change on gliclazide.
                For the same improvement in glycemic control, pioglitazone and metformin produce favorable changes in HDL and LDL subfractions compared with gliclazide in overweight type 2 diabetic patients. Such changes may be associated with reduced atherosclerosis risk and may inform the choice of initial oral hypoglycemic agent. In a randomized double-blind cross-over study the addition of metformin to chronic glibenclamide treatment was assessed conventionally (plasma glucose profile and HbA1c measurement) and with an euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic glucose clamp in ten non obese (body mass index 22.3 +/- 0.5 (+/- SE)kg.m-2) Type 2 diabetic patients with poor metabolic control. Metformin (500 mg twice a day) or placebo were added in randomized sequence for 6 weeks to their usual sulphonylurea treatment (glibenclamide 5 mg three times a day, before meals). On the last day of each administration period, an euglycaemic (glucose 5.5 +/- 0.5 mmol.l-1), hyperinsulinaemic (insulin 698.1 +/- 22.9 pmol.l-1) clamp was performed, together with a study of insulin binding to circulating monocytes. Metformin reduced fasting glucose levels (6.1 +/- 0.4 vs 6.4 +/- 0.4 mmol.l-1, P = 0.036), mean daily plasma glucose concentrations (9.2 +/- 0.4 mmol.l-1, P < 0.001), and HbA1c (8.7 +/- 0.3 vs 9.3 +/- 0.2%; P = 0.027). No variations were registered in fasting plasma insulin or body weight. A significant reduction of basal hepatic glucose production (12.8 +/- 2.7 vs 33.9 +/- 4.5 mumol.kg-1 min-1, P < 0.001), together with an increase in glucose utilization during the clamp (33.4 +/- 2.8 vs 25.9 +/- 1.1 mumol.kg-1.min-1, P = 0.033), was found after metformin, whereas residual glucose production during insulin infusion did not change. Insulin binding to circulating monocytes was higher after metformin (4.8 +/- 0.9 vs 3.2 +/- 0.6%, P = 0.020), while the lipaemic profile showed a reduction in triglycerides (1.2 +/- 0.1 vs 1.7 +/- 0.3 mmol.l-1, P = 0.039) and an increase in HDL-cholesterol (1.3 +/- 0.1 vs 1.0 +/- 0.1 mmol.l-1, P = 0.004) without variations in total cholesterol. These findings offer further evidence that metabolic control is improved after biguanide addition to sulphonylurea treatment, and support the hypothesis that biguanides improve insulin sensitivity both at the hepatic and peripheral (muscular) levels, as well as triglyceride metabolism. The relationship between use of antidiabetic drugs and metabolic control was studied in Swedish diabetic populations in areas with high (Gotland), medium (Tierp), and low (Skellefteå) sales of antidiabetic drugs.
                The study population consisted of 405 drug-treated diabetic subjects aged 50-74 yr. In all three areas, glyburide comprised approximately 75% of the oral treatment.
                In accordance with sales, Gotland was found to be a heavy-use area, characterized by a high prevalence of insulin treatment (43%), combination therapy with sulfonylureas and biguanide (28%), and high prescribed daily doses (PDDs) of glyburide (15.5 +/- 0.8 mg) compared with other areas. In Skellefteå, 38% were on insulin, 4% were on combination therapy, and the PDD of glyburide was 7.1 +/- 0.6 mg. In Tierp, 27% were on insulin, 26% were on combination therapy, and the PDD of glyburide was 11.4 +/- 0.7 mg. In Gotland, both men and women had significantly lower HbA1c levels, regardless of treatment mode, and a tendency to be more overweight compared with the area with the least pharmacological intensity (Skellefteå).
                In the three diabetic populations, good metabolic control, defined as an HbA1c level of less than 7% and acceptable weight control (body mass index less than 27 for men and less than 25 for women), was achieved among only 16% in Gotland, 17% in Skellefteå, and 12% in Tierp. This study was undertaken to assess the effect of metformin as a second-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in a defined population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We measured the extent and circumstances of metformin use in the 15,000-person diabetes registry of a large, group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Among subsets of patients in whom adequate glycemic control could not be maintained with sulfonylurea (SU) therapy, we compared glycemic control before and after metformin use to glycemic control during a similar interval before metformin was introduced. Metformin users were significantly more likely than nonusers to have had poor glycemic control at baseline. Nearly two thirds (63.8%) of patients with a glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) level >10% switched to metformin, as did 46.3% of those with an Hb A1c level of 8% to 10%. In all patients (metformin users and nonusers) in whom SU therapy failed to maintain glycemic control, Hb A1c levels decreased 0.9% after metformin was introduced, compared with a decrease of 0.4% during the control period. In a group-model HMO that promoted the use of metformin as second-line therapy in patients unable to maintain glycemic control with SU therapy, metformin reduced hyperglycemic levels. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the association of repaglinide, metformin and bedtime NPH insulin compared to two classic regimens: metformin plus NPH and two doses of NPH in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes despite two or more oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).
                Random, parallel and open study of 24 weeks with 37 patients randomized into three therapeutic groups: group A (n=12) (repaglinide/metformin/NPH), group B (n=12) (metformin/NPH) and group C (n=13) (NPH/NPH). The insulin was adjusted in the visits to obtain a basal blood glucose <110 mg/dl. The endpoint criteria included HbA1c, blood glucose profile, hypoglycemias and body weight.
                At the end of the study, group A presented HbA1c (mean+/-standard deviation) 7.2+/-0.7%, which was significantly less than B (8.8+/-0.1%) and C (8.4+/-1.2%). In terms of absolute reduction, there were only differences (p=0.01) between group A (-2.4+/-1.1%) and B (-0.7+/-1.2%). Group A presented lower postprandial blood glucose values (p<0.01). Nor were there any significant differences in weight gain and incidence of hypoglycemia.
                The combination of repaglinide, metformin and bedtime NPH is safe and effective and it provides better postprandial blood glucose control. The association of metformin and a dose of NPH does not obtain suitable control in patients with a long evolution who have already received two or more OADs. Hyperinsulinemia/insulin resistance and elevated plasma free fatty acids (FFA) levels are involved in the hypertension and cardiac sympathetic overactivity. Metformin improves insulin action and lower plasma FFA concentrations. We investigate the possible effect of metformin on arterial blood pressure (BP) and cardiac sympathetic nervous system.
                One hundred twenty overweight type 2 diabetic patients were treated by placebo (n = 60) + diet or metformin (850 mg twice daily) (n = 60) + diet for 4 months, to evaluate the effect of metformin treatment on the cardiac autonomic nervous system. Insulin resistance was measured by the Homeostasis Model Assessment (HOMA) index. Heart rate variability (HRV) assessed cardiac sympathovagal balance.
                Metformin treatment, but not placebo treatment, was associated with a decrease in fasting plasma glucose (P <.05), insulin (P <.05), triglyceride (P <.05), and FFA (P <.03) concentrations and HOMA index (P <.03). Metformin treatment was also associated with a significant improvement in cardiac sympathovagal balance but not in mean arterial BP. Furthermore, in a multivariate analysis, delta change in sympathovagal balance index (LF/HF ratio) were associated with delta change in plasma FFA concentrations and HOMA index independently of gender and delta change in plasma triglyceride and HbA1c concentrations.
                Our study demonstrated that metformin treatment might be useful for improving cardiac sympathovagal balance in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Low doses of metformin (500 mg twice daily) were administered to 20 diabetic patients, combined with the original sulfonylurea treatment which had become ineffective even at full dosage. After 1 and 5 weeks, the effects of the drug on glycemic control, blood intermediate metabolites and monocyte insulin receptors were monitored. Metformin clearly improved glycemic control by reducing both fasting blood glucose from 189.88 +/- 21.11 mg/dl to 131.12 +/- 16.02 mg/dl after 1 week and to 130.11 +/- 13.29 mg/dl after 5 weeks (p less than 0.025 both after 1 and 5 weeks); the diurnal blood glucose average fell from 235.33 +/- 24.11 mg/dl to 174.66 +/- 23.45 mg/dl (p less than 0.0025) after 1 week and to 177.65 +/- 21.71 mg/dl (p less than 0.0005) after 5 weeks. Consequently both blood glycosylated hemoglobin (p = n.s. after 1 week, p less than 0.025 after 5 weeks) and serum fructosamine (p less than 0.0025 after both 1 and 5 weeks) also decreased after metformin treatment. No change in plasma insulin and C-peptide levels was reported and no modification in diurnal rhythms of blood lactate, pyruvate, alanine glycerol and beta-OH-butyrate was detected at any time during metformin treatment. All the changes documented in the binding values were already complete at the end of the first week; insulin binding to monocytes increased slightly but significantly (p less than 0.05) and the number of receptors per cell rose (p less than 0.05) but could not be correlated to any index of glycemic control. These data suggest that the antidiabetic action of metformin is neither related to its lactate-increasing activity nor does it depend upon its inducing an increase in insulin binding values. This metformin-related hypoglycemic effect might be the result, at least in part, of a reduced oxidative phosphorylation without inhibition of hepatic gluconeogenesis and/or of decreased hepatic glucose output. Moreover, our data are also consistent with the hypothesis that metformin might affect insulin action at a post-receptor level. Cardiac disease is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Pioglitazone has been associated with improved cardiac outcome but also with an elevated risk of heart failure. We determined the effects of pioglitazone on myocardial function in relation to cardiac high-energy phosphate, glucose, and fatty acid metabolism and triglyceride content in T2DM patients.
                Seventy-eight T2DM men without structural heart disease or inducible ischemia as assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography were assigned to pioglitazone (30 mg/d) or metformin (2000 mg/d) and matching placebo for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change in cardiac diastolic function from baseline relative to myocardial metabolic changes, measured by magnetic resonance imaging, proton and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and [(18)F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and [(11)C]palmitate positron emission tomography. No patient developed heart failure. Both therapies similarly improved glycemic control, whole-body insulin sensitivity, and blood pressure. Pioglitazone versus metformin improved the early peak flow rate (P=0.047) and left ventricular compliance. Pioglitazone versus metformin increased myocardial glucose uptake (P<0.001), but pioglitazone-related diastolic improvement was not associated with changes in myocardial substrate metabolism. Metformin did not affect myocardial function but decreased cardiac work relative to pioglitazone (P=0.006), a change that was paralleled by a reduced myocardial glucose uptake and fatty acid oxidation. Neither treatment affected cardiac high-energy phosphate metabolism or triglyceride content. Only pioglitazone reduced hepatic triglyceride content (P<0.001).
                In T2DM patients, pioglitazone was associated with improvement in some measures of left ventricular diastolic function, myocardial glucose uptake, and whole-body insulin sensitivity. The functional changes, however, were not associated with myocardial substrate and high-energy phosphate metabolism. To compare initiation of insulin therapy by adding once-daily insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) with switching patients to premixed 30% regular, 70% human neutral protamine hagedorn insulin (70/30) without OADs.
                A 24-week, multicenter, open, randomized (1:1), parallel study.
                Three hundred sixty-four poorly controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated with once-daily morning insulin glargine with continued OADs (glimepiride+metformin) (glargine+OAD) or twice-daily 70/30 alone. Insulin dosage in each group was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 100 mg/dL or less (<or=5.6 mmol/L) using a weekly titration algorithm.
                This planned subgroup analysis of the original study was based on 130 insulin-naive patients aged 65 and older with FBG of 120 mg/dL or greater (>or=6.7 mmol/L) and hemoglobin (Hb)A(1c) levels between 7.5% and 10.5% on OADs (glargine+OAD, n=67; 70/30, n=63).
                HbA(1c), FBG, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and adverse events were recorded.
                HbA(1c) decreased from baseline to endpoint for both glargine+OAD (from 8.8% to 7.0%) and 70/30 (from 8.9% to 7.4%); adjusted mean HbA(1c) decrease for glargine+OAD and 70/30 was -1.9% and -1.4%, respectively (P=.003). More patients reached HbA(1c) of 7.0% or less without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia with glargine+OAD (n=37, 55.2%) than with 70/30 (n=19, 30.2%) (P=.006). FBG decreased significantly more with glargine+OAD (-57 mg/dL (-3.2 mmol/L)) than with 70/30 (-40 mg/dL (-2.2 mmol/L)) (P=.002). Patients treated with glargine+OAD experienced fewer episodes of any hypoglycemia (3.68/patient-year) than did those treated with 70/30 (9.09/patient-year) (P=.008).
                In elderly patients, addition of once-daily morning glargine+OAD is a simple regimen to initiate insulin therapy, restoring glycemic control more effectively and with less hypoglycemia than twice-daily 70/30 alone. Nine obese patients with Type II diabetes mellitus were examined in a double-blind cross-over study. Metformin 0.5 g trice daily or placebo were given for 4 weeks. At the end of each period fasting and day-time postprandial values of plasma glucose, insulin, C-peptide and lactate were determined, and in vivo insulin action was assessed using the euglycemic clamp in combination with [3-3H]glucose tracer technique. Metformin treatment significantly reduced mean day-time plasma glucose levels (10.2 +/- 1.2 vs 11.4 +/- 1.2 mmol/l, P less than 0.01) without enhancing mean day-time plasma insulin (43 +/- 4 vs 50 +/- 7 mU/l, NS) or C-peptide levels (1.26 +/- 0.12 vs 1.38 +/- 0.18 nmol/l, NS). Fasting plasma lactate was unchanged (1.57 +/- 0.16 vs 1.44 +/- 0.11 mmol/l, NS), whereas mean day-time plasma lactate concentrations were slightly increased (1.78 +/- 0.11 vs 1.38 +/- 0.11 mmol/l, P less than 0.01). The clamp study revealed that metformin treatment was associated with an enhanced insulin-mediated glucose utilization (370 +/- 38 vs 313 +/- 33 mg.m-2.min-1, P less than 0.01), whereas insulin-mediated suppression of hepatic glucose production was unchanged. Also basal glucose clearance was improved (61.0 +/- 5.8 vs 50.6 +/- 2.8 ml.m-2.min-1, P less than 0.05), whereas basal hepatic glucose production was unchanged (81 +/- 6 vs 77 +/- 4 mg.m-2.min-1, NS). Conclusions: 1) Metformin treatment in obese Type II diabetic patients reduces hyperglycemia without changing the insulin secretion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To compare efficacy and tolerability of combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea with each of these drugs alone in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, 88 type 2 diabetic subjects (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] levels, 8.0%+/-1.0%; age, 57.3+/-7.1 years; body mass index [BMI]. 27.0+/-2.6 kg/m2; diabetes duration, 9.8+/-8.2 years; means +/- SD) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with metformin (500 to 3,000 mg/d), glibenclamide (5 to 15 mg/d), or their combination (metformin 400 to 2,400 mg/d + glibenclamide 2.5 to 15 mg/d) for 6 months. Thereafter, groups were crossed over for the following 6 months. Thus, each patient received metformin or glibenclamide alone, and the combination treatment. Doses were titrated to obtain HbA1c levels < or = 6.0% and fasting plasma glucose levels less than 140 mg/dL. Eighty patients concluded both treatment periods and were included in the analysis of treatment efficacy. In patients receiving metformin or glibenclamide alone, the maximal dose was reached in 21 and 25 patients, respectively; 8 and 15 of these subjects, respectively, required the maximal dose when they were on the combination treatment. During the study, 4 (10.0%) subjects receiving metformin, 7 (17.1%) receiving glibenclamide, and 31 (39.2%) receiving the combination treatment reached HbA1c levels < or = 6.0%. Moreover, when efficacy of the combination treatment on glycemic control was compared with that of single-drug therapies in each individual patient, the combination was significantly more effective than either metformin or glibenclamide (HbA1c after treatment, 6.1%+/-1.1% v 7.3%+/-1.4%, and 6.5%+/-0.7% v 7.6%+/-1.5%, respectively, both P<.0001). In conclusion, combination treatment with metformin and sulfonylurea is more effective than these drugs alone in improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes, while also allowing a reduction of the dosage of each drug. This study was designed to assess the effect of metformin on impaired endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                Abnormalities in vascular endothelial function are well recognized among patients with type 2 (insulin-resistant) diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance itself may be central to the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction. The effects of metformin, an antidiabetic agent that improves insulin sensitivity, on endothelial function have not been reported.
                Subjects with diet-treated type 2 diabetes but without the confounding collection of cardiovascular risk factors seen in the metabolic syndrome were treated with metformin 500 mg twice daily (n = 29) or placebo (n = 15) for 12 weeks. Before and after treatment, blood flow responses to intraarterial administration of endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine), endothelium-independent (sodium nitroprusside) and nitrate-independent (verapamil) vasodilators were measured using forearm plethysmography. Whole-body insulin resistance was assessed on both occasions using the homeostasis model (HOMA-IR).
                Subjects who received metformin demonstrated statistically significant improvement in acetylcholine-stimulated flows compared with those treated with placebo (p = 0.0027 by 2-way analysis of variance), whereas no significant effect was seen on nitroprusside-stimulated (p = 0.27) or verapamil-stimulated (p = 0.40) flows. There was a significant improvement in insulin resistance with metformin (32.5% reduction in HOMA-IR, p = 0.01), and by stepwise multivariate analysis insulin resistance was the sole predictor of endothelium-dependent blood flow following treatment (r = -0.659, p = 0.0012).
                Metformin treatment improved both insulin resistance and endothelial function, with a strong statistical link between these variables. This supports the concept of the central role of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. This has important implications for the investigation and treatment of vascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. nan Pancreatic beta-cell responses to a controlled intravenous glucose stimulus in 18 untreated non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients were compared with those in seven healthy control subjects. The patients' first-and second-phase responses were only 10 to 20 per cent of those of the normal subjects. However, when normal subjects had been hyperglycaemic for two hours, their first-phase responses were similar to those of the patients. Six patients were subsequently treated by diet alone, six by diet and tolbutamide and six by diet and metformin. There was no improvement in first-phase responses after treatment, but second-phase responses doubled. Improved responses were seen with all treatments, and correlated with the fall in fasting blood glucose concentration during treatment. This study supports the view that hyperglycaemia impairs beta-cell function and suggests that first-phase responses are more sensitive to hyperglycaemia than second-phase responses. BACKGROUND: The strict limiting criteria for the use of metformin in diabetes mellitus stem largely from reports, in the 1970s, of mortality and lactic acidosis associated with phenformin. Data about metformin are less clear and are based mainly on case reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of continued use of metformin in patients with contraindications to this agent. PATIENTS: Some 393 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (serum creatinine 130-220 &mgr;mol/l) were studied. Among them were 266 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), 94 with congestive heart failure (CHF), and 91 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), all of whom had been treated with metformin. The patients were randomized to either continue or to stop metformin and were then followed for 4 years. RESULTS: Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The patients who stopped taking metformin showed a rise in body mass index and in hemoglobin A1c significantly greater than those who continued the drug. There were no cases of lactic acidosis. Lactic acid values did not differ in the two groups and correlated only with serum creatinine and body mass index. Microvascular diabetic complications, cardiovascular events, and cardiovascular and total mortality were identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients who are treated with metformin and who tolerate the drug well may continue taking it, even when mild renal impairment develops, possibly up to serum creatinine levels of 220 &mgr;mol/l. There is also no apparent reason why patients with CHD, CHF, and COPD should discontinue metformin. Dexfenfluramine is well known for its weight reducing action and has been reported to improve glycaemic control in obese Type 2 diabetic patients not adequately controlled on conventional oral hypoglycaemic therapy. In this double-blind placebo-controlled study, 20 obese Type 2 diabetic patients with mean HbA1c of 8.8 +/- 0.5% (normal range 3.5-6.0%), and mean body mass index (BMI) of 34.4 +/- 1.0 kg m-2, who were poorly controlled on insulin (mean dosage 58.0 +/- 6.1 units day-1) were randomized to receive either additional dexfenfluramine or placebo for 12 weeks. Seventeen of these patients were already taking maximum tolerated metformin therapy (mean dosage 1.6 +/- 0.2 g day-1) and the other three were unable to tolerate any at all. At baseline, the dexfenfluramine and placebo groups were similar in all parameters studied. After the 12-week treatment period, median HbA1c had fallen in dexfenfluramine treated patients from 8.5 (interquartile range (IR): 7.5-10.3) to 7.1% (IR: 6.7-7.5; p < 0.02). The fall in HbA1c in individual patients after treatment with dexfenfluramine was strongly associated with weight loss (r = 0.69; p < 0.04), although as a group the changes in weight and BMI were not statistically significant. Placebo was without effect. These results show that in the obese patient with Type 2 diabetes who is poorly controlled despite large daily doses of insulin and metformin, adjunctive dexfenfluramine can improve glycaemic control without exacerbating weight gain. Dexfenfluramine has been shown to promote weight loss in overweight people. The present double-blind study was designed to test whether the addition of dexfenfluramine to conventional oral hypoglycaemic treatment would promote weight loss and improve blood glucose control in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes. The 34 patients studied were randomly assigned to dexfenfluramine or placebo therapy which was added for 12 weeks to their existing treatment regimens of metformin with or without a sulphonylurea. Dexfenfluramine treatment was associated with a significant reduction in weight (98.7 +/- 5.0 (+/- SE) vs 94.9 +/- 5.2 kg; p less than 0.001), BMI (35.0 +/- 1.2 vs 33.6 +/- 1.9 kg m-2; p less than 0.001), HbA1c (7.5 +/- 0.3 vs 6.3 +/- 0.2%; p less than 0.001), fructosamine (313.9 +/- 17.6 vs 274.3 +/- 10.4 mumol l-1; p less than 0.01), systolic (137 +/- 5 vs 128 +/- 6 mmHg; p less than 0.05), and diastolic blood pressure (85 +/- 2 vs 73 +/- 3 mmHg; p less than 0.001). At the end of the study period, the dexfenfluramine treated group had a significantly lower HbA1c (6.3 +/- 0.2 vs 7.2 +/- 0.4; p less than 0.05), fructosamine level (274.3 +/- 10.4 vs 313.3 +/- 16.1 mumol l-1; p less than 0.05) and diastolic blood pressure (73 +/- 3 vs 81 +/- 3 mmHg; p less than 0.03) when compared with the placebo group. In those patients treated with dexfenfluramine, the reduction in HbA1c and blood pressure did not correlate with the decrease in BMI (r = 0.44 and 0.12, respectively).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Patients with Type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of liver damage. Therefore, it is of particular importance to investigate the hepatic effects of drugs used to treat such patients.
                Liver testing results performed in four 1-year, randomized, double-blind studies comparing effects of pioglitazone, metformin or a sulphonylurea, gliclazide, in the treatment of over 3700 patients with Type 2 diabetes have been analysed.
                Pioglitazone caused reductions in mean levels of hepatic enzymes of between 3 and 18%, whilst gliclazide caused small increases of between 3 and 13%. Metformin treatment showed either small mean increases or decreases. More patients receiving pioglitazone had liver tests within the normal range at the end of treatment (> or = 87%) compared with patients receiving metformin (> or= 80%) or gliclazide (> or = 75%). Slightly fewer patients with pioglitazone than with comparators showed a large increase (> 3 upper limit of normal) in alanine aminotransferase levels at any time during treatment (pioglitazone 0.9%, metformin 1.9%, gliclazide 1.9%).
                During pioglitazone treatment there is a reduction in liver enzyme levels. Although the mechanism of this effect is not clear, the results demonstrate potential beneficial effects on the liver during treatment of patients with Type 2 diabetes with pioglitazone. Addition of the long-acting basal human insulin analogue insulin glargine (LANTUS) to the treatment regimen of patients with inadequate glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) alone has previously been evaluated as effective, safe and convenient. This pilot study aimed to establish whether insulin glargine plus OADs is effective in Type 2 diabetes patients previously poorly controlled on premixed insulin therapy.
                In an open, controlled, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre, 16-week pilot study, 52 patients (age 65.6+/-9.2 years; diabetes duration 15.3+/-7.6 years; insulin therapy duration 4.2+/-1.7 years, body mass index 31.4+/-2.9 kg/m(2)) with Type 2 diabetes (HbA (1c)> or =8.0%) on premixed human insulin (75/25 or 70/30) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride (Group A; n=17), insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (Group B; n=18) or premixed insulin (Group C; n=17). Glycaemic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia were evaluated.
                HbA (1c) decreased significantly from baseline in Groups A and B, but not in Group C; (Group A: 7.87+/-0.66%, -0.35%, p=0.013; Group B: 7.44+/-0.92%, -0.69%, p=0.0057; Group C: 7.83+/-1.13%, -0.25%, p=0.32). There were no between-treatment differences at endpoint in HbA (1c), fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose or symptomatic hypoglycaemia (mean events/patient: Group A, 2.2; Group B, 2.3; Group C, 2.0). At endpoint, 88% of patients in Group A, 81% in Group B and 94% in Group C opted to continue with their assigned regimen.
                This pilot study is the first prospective study to show that switching from premixed insulin to insulin glargine plus OAD treatment resulted in similar glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction. The results support the need for prospective examination in a larger-scale clinical study in patients with long-standing Type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glycaemic control previously using a conventional premixed insulin regimen. Resistin is a protein secreted from adipose tissue that is thought to play a role in insulin sensitivity. We examined the effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on the plasma resistin levels in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who showed poor glycemic control with glimepiride (4 mg/d) were randomized to rosiglitazone (4 mg/d) and metformin (500 mg bid) treatment groups. All subjects continued glimepiride treatment as well. The plasma concentrations of resistin were measured at baseline and at 6 months of treatment for both groups. The anthropometric parameters, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, free fatty acids, and adiponectin concentrations were also measured. After 6 months of treatment, the reduction in plasma glucose levels was similar between the 2 groups. There were no significant changes in the lipid profiles of either group during the study period. The plasma resistin levels decreased in the rosiglitazone group (2.49 +/- 1.93 vs 1.95 +/- 1.59 ng/ml; P < .05) but increased in the metformin group (2.61 +/- 1.69 vs 5.13 +/- 2.81 ng/ml; P < .05). The plasma adiponectin concentrations were increased in the rosiglitazone group (2.91 +/- 1.46 vs 4.23 +/- 1.77 microg/ml; P < .05) but were unchanged in the metformin group. In summary, rosiglitazone treatment decreased the plasma resistin levels whereas metformin treatment increased them in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus showing poor glycemic control with sulfonylurea therapy. These results suggest that the observed changes in plasma resistin levels are not the consequences of improved insulin resistance, nor are they consequences of glycemic control. Considering the potential role of resistin in insulin resistance, decrease in resistin levels may contribute to improving insulin action with rosiglitazone treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the long-term effects of pioglitazone add-on to metformin or sulphonylurea on plasma lipids and lipoproteins.
                The effects of pioglitazone were studied in two clinical trials in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > or =7.5 and < or =11%). In the first trial, patients currently receiving metformin were randomised to pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n=317) or gliclazide (80-320 mg/day, n=313) add-on therapy. In the second study, pioglitazone (15-45 mg/day, n=319) or metformin (850-2,550 mg/day, n=320) was added to sulphonylurea therapy. Patients were force-titrated to the maximum tolerated dose of add-on therapy, which was maintained to the 2-year endpoint.
                There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 104. Whether added to metformin or sulphonylurea, pioglitazone caused highly significant greater decreases in triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol from baseline to week 104 than treatments with gliclazide or metformin add-on therapies (p< or =0.001). The triglyceride reductions noted with pioglitazone were maintained over time, with decreases of 16-18% at 1 year and 17-23% at 2 years. In the pioglitazone groups, the improvement in HDL cholesterol at 1 year was maintained, with 21-22% augmentations at 2 years (p<0.001 between-group difference). Small but statistically significant greater reductions in LDL cholesterol were observed with gliclazide vs pioglitazone add-on to metformin and metformin vs pioglitazone add-on to sulphonylurea (p<0.001 for between-group difference). In the pioglitazone groups, mean LDL cholesterol at 2 years was similar to mean baseline LDL cholesterol.
                After 2 years, highly significant decreases in triglycerides and increases in HDL cholesterol that were sustained over time or even improved were observed when pioglitazone was added to metformin or sulphonylurea therapy. These effects of pioglitazone on lipids may be potentially beneficial in reducing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. To compare long-term efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with nateglinide/metformin versus glyburide/metformin.
                We conducted a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, 2-year study of 428 drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients received 120 mg a.c. nateglinide or 1.25 mg q.d. glyburide plus 500 mg q.d. open-label metformin for the initial 4 weeks. During a subsequent 12-week titration period, glyburide and metformin were increased by 1.25- and 500-mg increments to maximum daily doses of 10 and 2,000 mg, respectively, if biweekly fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > or = 6.7 mmol/l. Nateglinide was not titrated. Blinding was maintained by use of matching placebo for nateglinide and glyburide. An 88-week monitoring period followed, during which HbA1c (A1C), FPG, and postprandial glucose excursions (PPGEs) during an oral glucose tolerance test were measured.
                In nateglinide/metformin-treated patients, mean A1C was 8.4% at baseline and 6.9% at week 104. In glyburide/metformin-treated patients, mean A1C was 8.3% at baseline and 6.8% at week 104 (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline for both treatments, NS between treatments). The deltaPPGE averaged -96 +/- 19 (P < 0.0001) and -57 +/- 22 mmol.l(-1).min(-1) (P < 0.05) in patients receiving nateglinide/metformin and glyburide/metformin, respectively, whereas deltaFPG was -1.6 +/- 0.2 (P < 0.0001) and -2.4 +/- 0.2 mmol/l (P < 0.0001) in patients receiving nateglinide/metformin and glyburide/metformin, respectively (P < 0.01 between groups). Thus, the two treatments achieved similar efficacy with differential effects on FPG versus PPGE. Hypoglycemia occurred in 8.2 and 17.7% of patients receiving nateglinide/metformin and glyburide/metformin, respectively.
                Similar good glycemic control can be maintained for 2 years with either treatment regimen, but nateglinide/metformin may represent a safer approach to initial combination therapy. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with enhanced platelet activation. We conducted a randomised double-blind study to compare the effects of combination metformin and rosiglitazone or metformin and gliclazide therapy on platelet function in persons with T2DM.
                Fifty subjects on metformin monotherapy received either rosiglitazone 4 mg or gliclazide 80 mg. HbA1c, HOMA-R, markers of platelet activation, inflammation, endothelial activation and oxidative stress were measured at baseline and after 24 weeks of treatment. Separate in vitro platelet function studies were conducted on platelets pre-incubated with rosiglitazone and gliclazide.
                A significantly greater reduction in platelet aggregation was observed in the rosiglitazone treated group compared to gliclazide. HbA1c and markers of endothelial activation were reduced to a similar extent in both groups. A significant reduction in HOMA-R, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress was only observed with rosiglitazone. Reduction in platelet aggregation with rosiglitazone correlated with reduction in oxidative stress. In the in vitro study, rosiglitazone produced significantly greater reduction in platelet aggregation compared with gliclazide.
                Greater reduction in platelet activity observed with rosiglitazone may be related to reduced oxidative stress and a possible direct PPARgamma mediated effect on platelet function. To determine the influence of metformin treatment on plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) and complement factor C3.
                A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of metformin in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes mellitus and body mass index > 25 kg/m2. CRP and C3 were analysed in stored plasma samples by in-house ELISAs. Patients attended two baseline visits before randomization and subsequently attended at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks post randomization. All patients gave informed consent according to a protocol approved by the Leeds Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Committee.
                Baseline CRP in the patients randomized to placebo [1.33 (0.79, 2.25) mg/l] and metformin [1.24 (0.89, 1.71) mg/l] were similar (P = 0.8). Baseline CRP correlated with baseline C3 (r = 0.366) and HbA1c (r = 0.327). The difference in ratios of CRP levels at each visit to baseline between placebo- (n = 16) and metformin-treated (n = 26) subjects was significantly different at the 12-week (P = 0.002) and 24-week (P = 0.03) visits. The difference in CRP ratios between the two treatment groups remained significant after accounting for glycaemic control at both visits (P = 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively). Baseline C3 was correlated with CRP. Baseline C3 was lower in the placebo-treated group [0.97 (0.88, 1.05) mg/ml] compared with the metformin-treated group [1.09 (1.02, 1.17) mg/ml, P = 0.03]. There was no difference in the mean change in C3 at any visit from baseline between placebo- and metformin-treated groups.
                Metformin may have a specific interaction with mechanisms involved in CRP synthesis or secretion, not directly related to improved insulin sensitivity and dampening of chronic inflammation. Which therapy should be used in Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with "secondary sulfonylurea failure", insulin or a combination of sulfonylurea and metformin? To address this question, we have compared the effect of 6 months of insulin therapy twice daily with that of a combination of glibenclamide and metformin in 24 Type 2 diabetic subjects, who no longer responded to treatment with sulfonylureas. Both treatments resulted in an equivalent 30% improvement in mean daily blood glucose (p less than 0.001), without significant effect on serum lipids. Insulin improved glycaemic control primarily by reducing basal hepatic glucose production (p less than 0.05), but had no significant effect on peripheral glucose metabolism. The combination of glibenclamide and metformin enhanced significantly total body glucose metabolism (p less than 0.05), predominantly by stimulating the non-oxidative pathway. Neither insulin nor the combination therapy altered B-cell response to a test meal. Insulin therapy resulted in a 6% increase in body weight, 63% of which was accounted for by increased fat mass. Although body weight was unchanged during sulfonylurea/metformin therapy, lean body mass and energy expenditure decreased significantly (p less than 0.05). We conclude that insulin and glibenclamide/metformin have different long-term effects on glucose and energy metabolism in Type 2 diabetes. We have shown that rosiglitazone increases whole-body and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity in humans.
                The aim of this study was to further examine whether possible changes in adipose perfusion could explain increased adipose tissue glucose uptake (GU).
                Thirty-seven patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were included.
                Patients were randomized into treatment with rosiglitazone, metformin, or placebo for 26 wk in a double-blinded trial.
                Femoral adipose flow and GU were measured with [15O]H2O, [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography during euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Adipose masses were measured using magnetic resonance imaging.
                Metformin and rosiglitazone treatment improved glycemic control, but only rosiglitazone increased whole-body insulin sensitivity. Rosiglitazone treatment increased flow by 72% (P < 0.01) and GU by 23% (P < 0.05) and thereby decreased adipose tissue glucose extraction by 18% (P < 0.05); no changes were observed in the metformin or placebo-treated groups. When the adipose masses were taken into account, rosiglitazone treatment increased flow by 73% (P < 0.01) and GU by 24% (P < 0.05). During hyperinsulinemia, flow correlated with GU (r = 0.63; P < 0.01).
                In conclusion, s.c. GU is associated with flow in patients with type 2 diabetes. Rosiglitazone treatment enhances GU and flow but decreases glucose extraction, suggesting that perfusion may contribute to adipose tissue insulin sensitization by rosiglitazone. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on insulin glargine versus rosiglitazone in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual oral therapy with sulfonylurea plus metformin.
                In this 24-week multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel trial, 217 patients (HbA(1c) [A1C] 7.5-11%, BMI >25 kg/m(2)) on > or =50% of maximal-dose sulfonylurea and metformin received add-on insulin glargine 10 units/day or rosiglitazone 4 mg/day. Insulin glargine was forced-titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or =5.5-6.7 mmol/l (< or =100-120 mg/dl), and rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day any time after 6 weeks if FPG was >5.5 mmol/l.
                A1C improvements from baseline were similar in both groups (-1.7 vs. -1.5% for insulin glargine vs. rosiglitazone, respectively); however, when baseline A1C was >9.5%, the reduction of A1C with insulin glargine was greater than with rosiglitazone (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine yielded better FPG values than rosiglitazone (-3.6 +/- 0.23 vs. -2.6 +/- 0.22 mmol/l; P = 0.001). Insulin glargine final dose per day was 38 +/- 26 IU vs. 7.1 +/- 2 mg for rosiglitazone. Confirmed hypoglycemic events at plasma glucose <3.9 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) were slightly greater for the insulin glargine group (n = 57) than for the rosiglitazone group (n = 47) (P = 0.0528). The calculated average rate per patient-year of a confirmed hypoglycemic event (<70 mg/dl), after adjusting for BMI, was 7.7 (95% CI 5.4-10.8) and 3.4 (2.3-5.0) for the insulin glargine and rosiglitazone groups, respectively (P = 0.0073). More patients in the insulin glargine group had confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia of <3.9 mmol/l (P = 0.02) and <2.8 mmol/l (P < 0.05) than in the rosiglitazone group. Effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels from baseline to end point with insulin glargine (-4.4, -1.4, and -19.0%, respectively) contrasted with those of rosiglitazone (+10.1, +13.1, and +4.6%, respectively; P < 0.002). HDL cholesterol was unchanged with insulin glargine but increased with rosiglitazone by 4.4% (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine had less weight gain than rosiglitazone (1.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.4 kg; P = 0.02), fewer adverse events (7 vs. 29%; P = 0.0001), and no peripheral edema (0 vs. 12.5%). Insulin glargine saved $235/patient over 24 weeks compared with rosiglitazone.
                Low-dose insulin glargine combined with a sulfonylurea and metformin resulted in similar A1C improvements except for greater reductions in A1C when baseline was > or =9.5% compared with add-on maximum-dose rosiglitazone. Further, insulin glargine was associated with more hypoglycemia but less weight gain, no edema, and salutary lipid changes at a lower cost of therapy. To determine the efficacy of acarbose, compared with placebo, on the metabolic control of NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on maximal doses of conventional oral agents.
                In this three-center double-blind study, 90 Chinese NIDDM patients with persistent poor glycemic control despite maximal doses of sulfonylurea and metformin were randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with acarbose 100 mg thrice daily or placebo for 24 weeks, after 6 weeks of dietary reinforcement. Efficacy was assessed by changes in HbA1c, fasting and 1-h postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels, and fasting lipid levels.
                Acarbose treatment was associated with significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (-0.5 +/- 0.2% vs. placebo 0.1 +/- 0.2% [means +/- SEM], P = 0.038), 1-h postprandial glucose (-2.3 +/- 0.4 mmol/l vs. placebo 0.7 +/- 0.4 mmol/l, P < 0.001) and body weight (-0.54 +/- 0.32 kg vs. placebo 0.42 +/- 0.29 kg, P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding changes in fasting plasma glucose and lipids or fasting and postprandial insulin levels. Flatulence was the most common side effect (acarbose vs. placebo: 28/45 vs. 11/44, P < 0.05). One patient on acarbose had asymptomatic elevations in serum transaminases that normalized in 4 weeks after acarbose withdrawal. Another patient on acarbose developed severe hypoglycemia; glycemic control was subsequently maintained on half the baseline dosage of sulfonylurea.
                In NIDDM patients inadequately controlled on conventional oral agents, acarbose in moderate doses resulted in beneficial effects on glycemic control, especially postprandial glycemia, and mean body weight. Additional use of acarbose can be considered as a useful alternative in such patients if they are reluctant to accept insulin therapy. nan To assess the addition of sitagliptin to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) 7-11%] on metformin monotherapy.
                Patients (n = 273) on metformin (>/=1500 mg/day) were randomized to receive the addition of once-daily placebo, sitagliptin 100 mg or rosiglitazone 8 mg in a 1 : 1 : 1 ratio for 18 weeks. The efficacy analysis was based on the all-patients-treated population using an analysis of co-variance with change in HbA(1c) from baseline as the primary endpoint.
                The mean baseline HbA(1c) was 7.7% for the entire cohort. After 18 weeks, both active add-on therapies led to greater improvements in HbA(1c) from baseline: -0.73% for sitagliptin (p < 0.001 vs. placebo) and -0.79% for rosiglitazone compared with -0.22% for placebo. No difference was observed between the sitagliptin and rosiglitazone treatments (0.06% [95% confidence interval (CI): -0.14 to 0.25]). The proportion of patients achieving an HbA(1c) < 7% was greater with sitagliptin (55%) and rosiglitazone (63%) compared with placebo (38%). Body weight increased from baseline with rosiglitazone (1.5 kg) compared with body weight reduction with sitagliptin (-0.4 kg) and placebo (-0.8 kg). The difference in body weight between the sitagliptin and rosiglitazone groups was 1.9 kg (95% CI: 1.3-2.5). In a prespecified analysis, the proportion of patients experiencing a greater than 3-kg increase in body weight was 21% in the rosiglitazone group compared with 2% in both the sitagliptin and placebo groups. Both active treatments were generally well tolerated, with no increased risk of hypoglycaemia or gastrointestinal adverse events compared with placebo.
                In this 18-week study, the addition of sitagliptin was effective and well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Treatment with sitagliptin produced similar reductions in HbA(1c) compared with the addition of rosiglitazone. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two dosage strengths of a single-tablet metformin-glibenclamide (glyburide) combination, compared with the respective monotherapies, in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy.
                In this 16-week, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group trial, 411 patients were randomized to receive metformin 500 mg, glibenclamide 5 mg, metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg or metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/5 mg, titrated with the intention to achieve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or = 7 mmol/l.
                Decreases in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and FPG were greater (P < 0.05) for metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg (-1.20% and -2.62 mmol/l) and 500 mg/5 mg (-0.91% and -2.34 mmol/l), compared with metformin (-0.19% and -0.57 mmol/l) or glibenclamide (-0.33% and -0.73 mmol/l). HbA1c < 7% was achieved by 75% and 64% of patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg and 500 mg/5 mg, respectively, compared with 42% for glibenclamide and 38% for metformin (P = 0.001). These benefits were achieved at lower mean doses of metformin or glibenclamide with metformin-glibenclamide 500 mg/2.5 mg and 500 mg/5 mg (1225 mg/6.1 mg and 1170 mg/11.7 mg) than with glibenclamide (13.4 mg) or metformin (1660 mg). Treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in two patients receiving glibenclamide. Plasma lipid profiles were unaffected and mean changes in body weight were < or = 1.0 kg.
                Intensive management of Type 2 DM with a new metformin-glibenclamide combination tablet improved glycaemic control and facilitated the attainment of glycaemic targets at lower doses of metformin or glibenclamide compared with the respective monotherapies, without compromising tolerability. Using carefully selected relatively non-obese non insulin dependent diabetic patients, we were not able to show differences in standard measures of insulin production or insulin action between patients treated with a long acting crystalline zinc insulin, with glibenclamide, or with metformin for a six week period. All three drugs were hypoglycaemic, but a fall in basal hepatic glucose output measured by the 3H3 glucose technique was only seen in those patients who had an initial fasting plasma glucose above 12.0 mmol/l, irrespective of treatment. The study aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with saxagliptin + metformin vs. saxagliptin or metformin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycaemic control.
                In this multicentre, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled phase 3 trial, 1306 treatment-naïve patients with T2D >or=18 to <or=77 years, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) >or=8 to <or=12%, fasting C-peptide concentration >or=1.0 ng/ml, body mass index <or=40 kg/m(2) were randomized to receive saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin 500 mg, saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin 500 mg, saxagliptin 10 mg + placebo or metformin 500 mg + placebo for 24 weeks. From weeks 1-5, metformin was uptitrated in 500-mg/day increments to 2000 mg/day maximum in the saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin, saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin and metformin + placebo treatment groups. The main outcome measure was HbA1c change from baseline to week 24. Selected secondary outcomes included change from baseline to week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7% and postprandial glucose area under the curve (PPG-AUC).
                At 24 weeks, saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin and saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin demonstrated statistically significant adjusted mean decreases vs. saxagliptin 10 mg and metformin monotherapies in HbA1c (-2.5 and -2.5% vs. -1.7 and -2.0%, all p < 0.0001 vs. monotherapy) and FPG (-60 and -62 mg/dl vs. -31 and -47 mg/dl, both p < 0.0001 vs. saxagliptin 10 mg; p = 0.0002 saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin vs. metformin; p < 0.0001 saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin vs. metformin). Proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c <7% was 60.3 and 59.7%, respectively, for saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin and saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin (all p < 0.0001 vs. monotherapy). PPG-AUC was significantly reduced [-21,080 mg x min/dl (saxagliptin 5 mg + metformin) and -21,336 mg x min/dl (saxagliptin 10 mg + metformin) vs. -16,054 mg x min/dl (saxagliptin 10 mg) and -15,005 mg x min/dl (metformin), all p < 0.0001 vs. monotherapy]. Adverse event occurrence was similar across all groups. Hypoglycaemic events were infrequent.
                Saxagliptin + metformin as initial therapy led to statistically significant improvements compared with either treatment alone across key glycaemic parameters with a tolerability profile similar to the monotherapy components. Metformin is widely used for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus, but its actions are poorly understood. In addition to diminishing hepatic glucose output, metformin, in muscle, activates 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), which alone increases glucose uptake and glycolysis, diminishes lipid synthesis, and increases oxidation of fatty acids. Moreover, such lipid effects may improve insulin sensitivity and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. Nevertheless, the effects of metformin on insulin-sensitive signalling factors in human muscle have only been partly characterised to date. Interestingly, other substances that activate AMPK, e.g., aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-beta-D: -riboside (AICAR), simultaneously activate atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), which appears to be required for the glucose transport effects of AICAR and insulin.
                Since aPKC activation is defective in type 2 diabetes, we evaluated effects of metformin therapy on aPKC activity in muscles of diabetic subjects during hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp studies.
                After metformin therapy for 1 month, basal aPKC activity increased in muscle, with little or no change in insulin-stimulated aPKC activity. Metformin therapy for 8 to 12 months improved insulin-stimulated, as well as basal aPKC activity in muscle. In contrast, IRS-1-dependent phosphatidylinositol (PI) 3-kinase activity and Ser473 phosphorylation of protein kinase B were not altered by metformin therapy, whereas the responsiveness of muscle aPKC to PI-3,4,5-(PO(4))(3), the lipid product of PI 3-kinase, was improved.
                These findings suggest that the activation of AMPK by metformin is accompanied by increases in aPKC activity and responsiveness in skeletal muscle, which may contribute to the therapeutic effects of metformin. The purpose of this study was to determine the most suitable treatment for Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients with secondary failure to sulfonylureas (SFS). In a four-month comparative study, 36 Type 2 diabetic patients given SFS were allocated to three treatment groups: A (n = 12, M/F 6/6, HbAlc 9.1 +/- 1.6%) received 0.3 IU/Kg body weight (BW) of insulin-Zn between 10 and 11 p.m.; B (n = 12, M/F 6/6, HbAlc 9.2 +/- 1.6%) SFS plus 850 mg/day of metformin; and C (n = 12, M/F 6/6, HbAlc 9.5 +/- 2.4%) SFS plus acarbose 3 x 100 mg daily. Modifications in HbAlc, BW, blood pressure (BP), lipoprotein profile and insulin sensitivity were evaluated. HbAlc decreased in the three groups (A: 17.9 +/- 13.5%; B: 18.2 +/- 4.5%; C: 7.6 +/- 16.8%; all p < 0.05; A and B vs C = p < 0.05). BW increased in group A and decreased in the other groups. BP decreased statistically in group B. HDL-cholesterol increased (1.26 +/- 0.46 vs 1.49 +/- 0.36 mmol/L; p < 0.05) and triglyceride levels decreased (1.68 +/- 0.85 vs 1.16 +/- 0.43 mmol/L; p < 0.05) in group A. There were no significant changes in the other studied parameters. We conclude that, for Type 2 diabetic patients given SFS, both insulin and metformin plus SFS provided better glycaemic control than acarbose plus SFS. Metformin combined with SFS offered further advantages for the control of BW and BP. nan To compare the effect of adding metformin to insulin therapy with a moderate increase in insulin dose alone in insulin-treated, poorly controlled Type 2 diabetic patients, 47 consecutive such patients (baseline daily dose >0.5 IU kg(-1) and HbA1c >8%) were openly randomized either to a combination of their previous insulin schedule plus metformin (2.55 g daily in three divided doses, n = 24) or to a moderate insulin dose increase (20% of baseline, n = 23). The patient status/biochemical profile was assessed at entry and at 4 months. Among those assigned to insulin + metformin, 18 took the drug. Upon an intention-to-treat basis, patients assigned to insulin dose increase had a statistically significant weight gain (1.16+/-1.9 vs 0.3+/-4.5 kg, p < 0.05). Patients assigned to the insulin + metformin regimen experienced a significantly greater fall in HbA1c (-1.87+/-2.16 vs 0.03+/-1.68%, p < 0.01), total cholesterol (-0.56+/-0.89 vs 0.14+/-0.72 mmol l(-1), p < 0.05) and LDL-cholesterol (-0.51+/-0.73 vs 0.19+/-0.6 mmol l(-1), p < 0.01). These data suggest that adding metformin to insulin in poorly controlled Type 2 DM patients offers an advantage in terms of glycaemic control and lipid plasma profile. This preliminary study is aimed at the evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of combined therapy with gliclazide and metformin in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with maximal doses of gliclazide.
                A prospective, uncontrolled study, with a follow-up of 3 months, was performed in two Outpatient Diabetes Care Units. Fifty-seven patients affected by type 2 diabetes for at least 5 years, aged 61.0 +/- 3.4 years, with a duration of diabetes of 9.2 +/- 3.9 years, Body Mass Index (BMI) 30.5 +/- 3.7 kg/m2, previously treated with gliclazide 240 mg/day, and with HbA1c > 8.5%, were studied. The patients were treated with gliclazide 120 mg/day and metformin 1500 mg/day for 3 months; HbA1c, 24-hour glycosuria, and fasting and post-prandial glycaemia, were determined at the beginning and at the end of the study.
                After a 3-month treatment, a reduction of fasting and post-prandial glycaemia, glycosuria (15.0 +/- 5.3 versus 5.7 +/- 4.0 g/l, p < 0.01), and HbA1c (9.9 +/- 1.1 versus 8.4 +/- 1.0%, p < 0.01) was observed, while no significant changes occurred in body weight. The treatment was generally well tolerated.
                In conclusion, the combination of gliclazide and metformin, which could theoretically show some advantages over the association of glibenclamide and metformin with regards to lipid and haemorheologic profiles, resulted to be effective and well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with sulphonylurea monotherapy. We examined the individual pharmacological effects of the addition of rosiglitazone and metformin to glimepiride on inflammatory markers and adipokines in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We analysed the relationships between these variables, the measurements of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function in patients treated with rosiglitazone plus glimepiride.
                One hundred twenty (120) patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized and treated with glimepiride plus rosiglitazone or glimepiride plus metformin for 12 weeks. The plasma concentrations of the inflammatory markers and adipokines were measured at baseline and after 12 weeks.
                Markers of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function were determined by the quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and the homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-beta), respectively. Plasma concentrations of adiponectin were measured by radioimmunoassay. Plasma concentrations of resistin, tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and interleukin-18 (IL-18) were measured using ELISA.
                Improvements in fasting insulin level, QUICKI and HOMA-beta were noted in the rosiglitazone-treated group. Only the QUICKI value improved in the metformin-treated group. Adiponectin concentrations significantly increased in the rosiglitazone-treated group after 12 weeks. Significant decreases in resistin, C-reactive protein, TNF-alpha, IL-6 and IL-18 were seen in the rosiglitazone-treated patients but not in the metformin-treated patients. The independent risk factor for the HOMA-beta change according to stepwise multivariate regression analysis was a change in IL-18.
                Rosiglitazone, but not metformin, improved the plasma concentrations of inflammatory markers and adipokines in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A decrease in IL-18 is an independent factor for the improvement of HOMA-beta in type 2 diabetes mellitus. The present study was a 52-week extension of a previously published, multi-center, randomized, parallel-group study. The aim of this extension study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of vildagliptin and metformin in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. The extension population comprised 305 patients randomized to vildagliptin (100 mg daily) and 158 patients randomized to metformin (2 000 mg daily). Pioglitazone was added as rescue medication if fasting glucose was >10 mmol/l; data from patients receiving rescue medication were excluded from the primary analysis. Baseline HbA (1c) averaged 8.4+/-0.1% in patients randomized to vildagliptin and 8.8+/-0.1% in those randomized to metformin. The adjusted mean change from baseline to study endpoint was -1.0+/-0.1% in vildagliptin-treated patients and -1.5+/-0.1% in those receiving metformin (p<0.001 vs. vildagliptin). These results were similar to those reported after the 1-year core phase of the study. The adjusted mean changes in body weight from baseline to endpoint were 0.5+/-0.4 kg and -2.5+/-0.5 kg in the vildagliptin and metformin groups, respectively. One or more adverse event (AE) was reported by 82.2% of patients receiving vildagliptin and by 87.3% of those receiving metformin (p<0.001). Gastrointestinal AEs were more common in patients receiving metformin (45.6%) than in those receiving vildagliptin (25.0%, p<0.001 vs. metformin). One hypoglycemic event occurred after strenuous exercise in a single patient receiving vildagliptin (0.3%). In conclusion, both vildagliptin and metformin monotherapy provided clinically meaningful decreases in HbA (1c) over 2 years in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Vildagliptin was weight neutral, while weight loss was observed with metformin; however, metformin was associated with significantly worse gastrointestinal tolerability. Both glibenclamide and metformin have been used alone or in association for many years. In the treatment of type 2 or non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Glibenclamide stimulates insulin release by pancreatic beta cells (pancreatic attachment point), while metformin acts at a peripheral level by increasing glucose absorption in muscular, fatty and hepatic tissues, thus considerably reducing insulin resistance (extra-pancreatic attachment point). The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the pre-formed association of glibenclamide 2.5 mg+metformin 400 mg (treatment group 1) compared to treatment with glibenclamide 5 mg alone (treatment group 2) at almost double therapeutic doses compared to those contained in the association. A total of 40 NIDDM patients were examined (24 females and 16 males) with a mean age of 55.86 years, a mean duration of disease of 9.37 years, generally obese or overweight. From the final results of the study it was found that the associative therapy of glibenclamide 2.5 mg+metformin 400 mg was very advantageous, leading to a significant improvement in the glycometabolic control (HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose) compared to patients treated using single drug therapy who maintained almost stable control of the disease. To investigate the efficacy and safety of miglitol in combination with metformin in improving glycemic control in outpatients in whom type 2 diabetes is insufficiently controlled by diet alone.
                In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 324 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized, after an 8-week placebo run-in period, to treatment with either placebo, miglitol alone, metformin alone, or miglitol plus metformin for 36 weeks. The miglitol was titrated to 100 mg three times a day and metformin was administered at 500 mg three times a day. The primary efficacy criterion was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to the end of treatment. Secondary parameters included changes in fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels, serum triglyceride levels, and responder rate.
                A total of 318 patients were valid for intent-to-treat analysis. A reduction in mean placebo-subtracted HbA(1c) of -1.78% was observed with miglitol plus metformin combination therapy, which was significantly different from treatment with metformin alone (-1.25; P = 0.002). Miglitol plus metformin also resulted in better metabolic control than metformin alone for fasting plasma glucose (-44.8 vs. -20.4 mg/dl; P = 0.0025), 2-h postprandial glucose area under the curve (-59.0 vs. -18.0 mg/dl; P = 0.0001), and responder rate (70.6 vs. 45.52%; P = 0.0014). All therapies were well tolerated.
                In type 2 diabetic patients, miglitol in combination with metformin gives greater glycemic improvement than metformin monotherapy. Both slow-release (SR) and regular-release (RR) metformin were effective in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. We compare the efficacy, safety, and effects on serum adipocytokines and inflammatory markers of both regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study enrolled 55 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, which were randomly assigned to receive either metformin SR or RR (at a maximal dosage of 2000 mg/d for 12 weeks). Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, adipocytokines, C-reactive protein, and insulin resistance and pancreatic beta-cell function were measured before and after treatment. Significant decreases (P<.001) in mean HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels were observed in each group. However, the mean changes in HbA1c from baseline to end point in the 2 groups were not significantly different. Changes in metabolic parameters were similar except that a decreased total cholesterol level was observed in the metformin RR group. Neither regimen treatment had any influence on insulin resistance, but metformin RR improved beta-cell function. Neither regimen had an effect on serum adipocytokines or inflammatory markers. Once-daily metformin SR was as safe and effective as metformin RR in type 2 diabetic patients. Neither dosage form affected serum adipocytokines and inflammatory markers. Inflammation is involved in the pathophysiologic process of atherosclerosis, a frequent complication of type 2 diabetes. The purpose of our study was to investigate the effect of pioglitazone on systemic inflammatory markers and activation of circulating monocytes in type 2 diabetic patients through the dosage of IL-6. Twenty-four metformin-treated patients, in good glycemic control, were randomized to add pioglitazone for 8 weeks or to continue their previous treatment. Blood samples were collected before and at the end of the study to evaluate: serum levels of high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin (IL)-6 and leukocyte activation. IL-6 production of circulating monocytes after LPS stimulation was similar at baseline and showed a 54% reduction in pioglitazone-group at 8 weeks (9.1 pg/mL, range 0.0-24.3, P=0.04 vs. baseline) while, in controls, did not change at 8 weeks (16.9 pg/mL, range 1.5-58.8). Treatment with pioglitazone, associated with metformin, showed a reduction of IL-6 monocyte production after their in vitro activation with LPS. The oral antidiabetic benfluorex lowers insulin resistance in liver and muscle without stimulating insulin secretion; it is more effective than a biguanide in lowering insulin and triglyceride levels and does not elevate lactate. This double-blind multicenter community study compared the addition of benfluorex versus placebo to diet plus metformin in 127 uncontrolled obese type II diabetics. After a 2-month run-in on diet plus metformin, overall mean glucose was 7.7 mmol/L or greater (fasting) and/or 11 mmol/L or greater (2 h after 75-g oral glucose), with 20% or greater excess body weight [body-mass index (women/men): > or = 26.9/> or = 27.2 kg/m2). Patients were then randomized to adjuvant benflouorex (n = 63; 150 mg t.i.d.) or placebo (n = 64) for 90 days, with centralized biochemical monitoring. On benfluorex, glucose decreased from day 0 to day 90 (fasting: 8.99+/-2.76 to 7.81+/-2.32 mmol/L, p = 0.002; 2 h post-load: 16.56+/-4.49 to 15.09+/-5.09 mmol/L, p = 0.029) versus increases on placebo (intergroup p = 0.003 and p = 0.001, respectively). HbA decreased on benfluorex (7.47+/-1.44 to 7.12+/-1.13%; p = 0.013) versus no change on placebo. Basal and stimulated insulin and C peptide did not change in either group. Body weight remained similar in both groups. Tolerability was good in both groups, with no increase in hypoglycemia on benfluorex. Adjuvant behfluorex improves glycemic control in obese type II diabetics uncontrolled by diet plus metformin. The combination is safe, well-tolerated and suitable for introduction into routine practice. nan To examine the mechanism by which metformin lowers endogenous glucose production in type 2 diabetic patients, we studied seven type 2 diabetic subjects, with fasting hyperglycemia (15.5 +/- 1.3 mmol/l), before and after 3 months of metformin treatment. Seven healthy subjects, matched for sex, age, and BMI, served as control subjects. Rates of net hepatic glycogenolysis, estimated by 13C nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, were combined with estimates of contributions to glucose production of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, measured by labeling of blood glucose by 2H from ingested 2H2O. Glucose production was measured using [6,6-2H2]glucose. The rate of glucose production was twice as high in the diabetic subjects as in control subjects (0.70 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.03 mmol x m(-2) min(-1), P < 0.0001). Metformin reduced that rate by 24% (to 0.53 +/- 0.03 mmol x m(-2) x min(-1), P = 0.0009) and fasting plasma glucose concentration by 30% (to 10.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, P = 0.0002). The rate of gluconeogenesis was three times higher in the diabetic subjects than in the control subjects (0.59 +/- 0.03 vs. 0.18 +/- 0.03 mmol x m(-2) min(-1) and metformin reduced that rate by 36% (to 0.38 +/- 0.03 mmol x m(-2) x min(-1), P = 0.01). By the 2H2O method, there was a twofold increase in rates of gluconeogenesis in diabetic subjects (0.42 +/- 0.04 mmol m(-2) x min(-1), which decreased by 33% after metformin treatment (0.28 +/- 0.03 mmol x m(-2) x min(-1), P = 0.0002). There was no glycogen cycling in the control subjects, but in the diabetic subjects, glycogen cycling contributed to 25% of glucose production and explains the differences between the two methods used. In conclusion, patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes have increased rates of endogenous glucose production, which can be attributed to increased rates of gluconeogenesis. Metformin lowered the rate of glucose production in these patients through a reduction in gluconeogenesis. This prospective study evaluates the effect of insulin sensitizers, pioglitazone (PGZ) and metformin (MET) on plasma adiponectin and leptin levels in subjects newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                Double blind, randomized, active control, dose escalation study of 12 weeks treatment duration.
                Thirty apparently healthy, treatment-naive T2DM patients diagnosed within the past 6 months.
                Plasma adiponectin and leptin levels were estimated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and insulin resistance by the homeostasis model of assessment (HOMA-IR).
                Baseline plasma levels of adiponectin were lower in diabetic (n = 30) subjects than matched controls (n = 10, 6.6 +/- 1.1 vs 10.4 +/- 4.2 microg/ml, P = 0.021). The 12-week treatment with PGZ significantly increased adiponectin concentrations (6.6 +/- 1.1-17.9 +/- 7.4 microg/ml, P < 0.001) with no alteration in the MET treated group (6.8 +/- 1.5-6.7 +/- 2.8 microg/ml, P = 0.9). A significant decrease in plasma leptin levels was observed in the MET treated group (32.0 +/- 28.9-21.4 +/- 23.3 ng/ml, P = 0.024) but not in the PGZ treated group (23.9 +/- 24.1-22.4 +/- 25.4 ng/ml, P = 0.69). The alterations in plasma adiponectin and leptin levels were not associated with any change in body mass index (BMI). PGZ therapy improved insulin sensitivity to a greater degree (P = 0.007 and P = 0.001 for fasting plasma insulin (FPI) and HOMA-IR, respectively) than MET (P = 0.75 and P = 0.02 for FPI and HOMA-IR, respectively) but this improvement was not significantly different from that of MET at the end of 12 weeks (P = 0.146 and P = 0.09 for FPI and HOMA-IR, respectively). However, improvement in insulin sensitivity with PGZ was not commensurate with the increase in adiponectin. Better control of postbreakfast plasma glucose (PBPG) as well as decrease in serum triglycerides (TGs) were also seen with PGZ (PBPG, P < 0.001; TGs, P = 0.013). The rest of the parameters were comparable. Adverse reactions reported were minor and did not result in treatment discontinuation.
                Pioglitazone therapy appears to be better in achieving glycaemic control and increasing plasma adiponectin and insulin sensitivity in newly detected type 2 diabetics. To compare the effects of bedtime NPH Insulin vs Metformin combined with Glibenclamide in patients who are obese and had secondary failure to sulphonylurea treatment.
                Prospective, randomized, comparative study of patients having type-II diabetes, without complications with associated obesity and secondary failure to sulphonylureas. Thirty-six obese patients who continued to have blood glucose values of fasting > 150 mg/dl and/or random > 220 mg/dl, after 8 weeks of intensive dietary and drug therapy.
                For the 20 weeks of study, the patients were randomised in two equal groups, one receiving 20 to 40 units of NPH Insulin at bed time and the second group, Metformin upto a maximum dose of 3 grams, along with Sulphonylureas.
                Both the groups showed, a significant reduction in the blood glucose values, with an average decrease of 50 mg/dl. The other monitored parameters, such as, serum cholesterol, triglycerides and blood pressure values, also demonstrated a similar downwards trend. However, the drop out rate was high in the Insulin treated group and the remainder group did show slight increase in weight and BMI, while the reverse, stood true, for the metformin group, with 100% compliance rate.
                Metformin, in obese, type II diabetics, with secondary failure to Sulphonylureas, is an effective, safe and well tolerated treatment, which not only improves the metabolic control but also favourably modifies other parameters such as weight, total cholesterol and triglyceride values. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of a novel extended-release metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                Adults with type 2 diabetes (newly diagnosed, treated with diet and exercise only, or previously treated with oral diabetic medications) were randomly assigned to receive one of three extended-release metformin treatment regimens (1,500 mg/day q.d., 1,500 mg/day twice daily, or 2,000 mg/day q.d.) or immediate-release metformin (1,500 mg/day twice daily) in a double-blind 24-week trial.
                Significant decreases (P < 0.001) in mean HbA(1c) (A1C) levels were observed by week 12 in all treatment groups. The mean changes from baseline to end point in the two groups given 1,500 mg extended-release metformin (-0.73 and -0.74%) were not significantly different from the change in the immediate-release metformin group (-0.70%), whereas the 2,000-mg extended-release metformin group showed a greater decrease in A1C levels (-1.06%; mean difference [2,000 mg extended-release metformin - immediate-release metformin]: -0.36 [98.4% CI -0.65 to -0.06]). Rapid decreases in fasting plasma glucose levels were observed by week 1, which continued until week 8, and were maintained for the duration of the study. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar for all treatment groups, but fewer patients in the extended-release metformin groups discontinued treatment due to nausea during the initial dosing period than in the immediate-release metformin group.
                Once- or twice-daily extended-release metformin was as safe and effective as twice-daily immediate-release metformin and provided continued glycemic control for up to 24 weeks of treatment. The clinical effectiveness of metformin was compared with that of chlorpropamide in closely similar groups of 216 non-obese patients recently diagnosed as cases of maturity-onset diabetes that could not be controlled by diet. The incidences of primary and secondary drug failures in each group and the numbers of patients satisfactorily maintained on each of the hypoglycaemic agents throughout the first year proved remarkably similar. In 61 of the successfully treated patients who were studied by crossover to the other drug and observed for a further year the mean blood glucose concentrations at the end of the year were roughly comparable, but the mean weight response was a small loss of 1.5 +/- 3.8 kg with metformin but a gain of 4.6 +/- 3.9 kg with chlorpropamide. Thus for non-obese, maturity-onset diabetics whose disease cannot be controlled by diet and who require oral treatment sulphonylureas and biguanides are equally effective, the choice depending on whether the patient is underweight and the severity of symptoms. Insulin resistance is a major feature of type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Several studies pointed out the possible role of increased leptin in NAFLD in humans. The aim of this study is to determine the effect of metformin on plasma leptin levels in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and NAFLD compared with lifestyle interventions. Thirty-four obese patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus were prospectively followed for 6 months. All patients had ultrasonographic evidence of NAFLD at baseline. The patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 (n = 15) followed lifestyle changes only and group 2 (n = 19) received metformin (1,700 mg/day). At the end of treatment, BMI, WHR, HbA1c, fasting glucose, leptin, HOMA-IR, alanine aminotransferase values decreased in both groups. No significant difference in the end-points was observed between two groups. Only in group 2, LDL decreased and HDL increased significantly. Liver echogenity decreased significantly at the end of study in both groups. The percentage of patients who no longer had evidence of NAFLD was not significantly different between the groups (20% of patients on lifestyle intervention vs. 16% of patients on metformin). The data demonstrate that, metformin and lifestyle interventions equally affected the plasma leptin levels, BMI and degree of NAFLD in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, the effects of metformin on the variables were not found to be mediated by leptin. Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761) has been shown to ameliorate some defects associated with the insulin resistance syndrome and so patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be inclined to co-ingest the herb with their medications, such as metformin. This study was designed to determine if the co-ingestion of EGb 761 and metformin would alter the pharmacokinetic properties of metformin in T2DM patients and persons without diabetes, who may ingest it for other purposes.
                Normal glucose tolerance (NGT) subjects (n=10; age, 39.2+/-14.0 years; fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 90+/-7 mg/dl; body mass index (BMI), 24.1+/-3.7 kg/m(2)) and 10 T2DM patients (n=10; age, 51.7+/-8.9 years; FPG, 150+/-7 mg/dl; BMI, 33.7+/-5.7 kg/m(2)) completed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. They ingested either EGb 761 (12 0mg/day as a single dose) or a vegetable-based placebo during each arm for 3 months. At the end of each arm, the NGT subject ingested a single 500 mg dose of metformin (non-diabetics) and the T2DM subject took his/her prescribed metformin dose (250-850 mg) with 120 mg EGb 761. Blood and urine samples were collected over an 8-h period, and in the case of T2DM subjects, additionally over the first 2h of the subsequent 3 days.
                Ingestion of EGb 761 produced no significant changes in diagnostic laboratory tests in either group, except reducing glycosylated hemoglobin A(1c) levels (from 7.7+/-1.2 to 7.2+/-0.9%, P<0.05) in T2DM the subjects. The pharmacokinetic parameters of metformin were all significantly different (P<0.05) between the NGT (500 mg) and 8 out of 10 of the T2DM subjects who were prescribed 500 mg of metformin during the placebo cycles. During the EGb 761 cycles, only the elimination half-life in the T2DM subjects was significantly increased (0.117+/-0.085 to 0.141+/-0.100, P<0.05).
                The co-ingestion of 120 mg of EGb 761 and 500 mg of metformin did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetic properties of metformin. Further studies are required to verify this observation for smaller and larger dose of metformin with other doses of EGb 761, since T2DM patients on medication constitute a very heterogeneous group. The effect of metformin treatment was studied in nine patients with mild (fasting plasma glucose concentration less than 7.5 mmol.l-1) non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and fasting plasma triglyceride (TG) concentration greater than 2.0 mmol.l-1. Individuals were studied before and three months after receiving 2.5 g/day of metformin. Mean hourly plasma glucose concentration from 8 AM to 4 PM (7.5 +/- 0.5 vs 6.5 +/- 0.4 mmol.l-1, p less than 0.001), as well as glycosylated hemoglobin levels (7.0 +/- 0.5 vs 6.2 +/- 0.2%, p less than 0.02) were significantly lower following metformin treatment. The improvement in glycaemic control was not associated with an improvement in insulin stimulated glucose disposal as measured by the glucose clamp technique. Mean hourly day-long concentrations of plasma insulin (519 +/- 81 vs 364 +/- 64 pmol.l-1, p less than 0.001), FFA (502 +/- 45 vs 460 +/- 35 mu mol.l-1, p less than 0.01), and triglyceride (3.60 +/- 0.33 vs 3.02 +/- 0.31 mmol.l-1, p less than 0.001) concentrations were significantly lower following three months of metformin treatment. Finally, fasting plasma TG concentration, very low density lipoprotein (VLDL)-TG, and VLDL-cholesterol concentrations were significantly decreased, while high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol concentration was significantly increased following metformin therapy. Thus, metformin administration to individuals with NIDDM, who did not have significant fasting hyperglycaemia, led to a decrease in plasma glucose, insulin, FFA, and TG concentration, and an increase in plasma HDL-cholesterol concentration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Recently the UKPDS study revealed the potency of metformin therapy in obese type 2 diabetic patients. A retrospective study was performed to assess the efficacy of metformin therapy in improving metabolic control in everyday practice.
                Type 2 diabetic patients were included if they met the following criteria: metformin had been added when the previous treatment failed to optimise glycaemic control expressed in HbA1c level; duration of metformin therapy had to be at least six months. Efficacy of metformin therapy, expressed as a decrease in HbA1c, was measured with a median follow-up of 32 (range 6-60) months. Variables were analysed using a paired t-test.
                One hundred and sixty-three patients were treated with metformin. 98 patients were excluded, because of absence of an HbA1c value prior to treatment with metformin mainly (n = 78). The mean HbA1c of included patients had decreased 1.4% (p < 0.001) after 6 months (n = 65), 1.6% (p < 0.001) after 24 months (n = 45) and 1.5 (p < 0.001) after 36 months (n = 28). During follow-up there was no significant weight gain or loss.
                Metformin can be considered an effective treatment to improve glycaemic control in obese type 2 diabetic patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether acute and chronic metformin administration may influence differently the glycaemic and insulin response to foods with high and low glycaemic index (bread and pasta) in twelve non-insulin dependent diabetic (NIDDM) patients. Thirty minutes after a random oral administration of either a placebo or a single 850 mg metformin dose, glycaemic and insulin responses to 90 g white bread or 68 g pasta (corresponding to 50 g carbohydrates) were evaluated within 4 h. All the patients were subsequently treated with metformin (850 mg twice a day) for a month and then glycaemic and insulin responses were evaluated again. The acute administration of metformin lowered glycaemic response to bread at 60 and 90 min (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively) but not to pasta, without affecting insulin response. Chronic metformin treatment significantly lowered glycaemic and insulin response to both bread and pasta. In conclusion, an acute antihyperglycaemic effect of metformin was demonstrable only when a food with high glycaemic index, such as bread, was eaten. On the contrary, the effect of chronic treatment was always present, independent from the glycaemic index of foods, together with a reduction in insulin response, indicating an enhanced sensitivity to endogenous insulin. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of PHX1149, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                This is a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 4-week study in patients with type 2 diabetes with suboptimal metabolic control. Patients with a baseline haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of 7.3 to 11.0% were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 : 1 to receive once-daily oral therapy with either PHX1149 (100, 200 or 400 mg) or placebo; patients were on a constant background therapy of either metformin alone or metformin plus a glitazone.
                Treatment with 100, 200 or 400 mg of PHX1149 significantly decreased postprandial glucose area under the curve AUC(0-2 h) by approximately 20% (+0.11 +/- 0.50, -2.08 +/- 0.51, -1.73 +/- 0.49 and -1.88 +/- 0.48 mmol/l x h, respectively, for placebo and 100, 200 and 400 mg (p = 0.002, 0.008 and 0.004 vs. placebo). Postprandial AUC(0-2 h) of intact glucagon-like peptide-1, the principal mediator of the biological effects of DPP4 inhibitors, was increased by 3.90 +/- 2.83, 11.63 +/- 2.86, 16.42 +/- 2.72 and 15.75 +/- 2.71 pmol/l x h, respectively, for placebo and 100, 200 and 400 mg (p = 0.053, 0.001 and 0.002 vs. placebo). Mean HbA(1c) was lower in all dose groups; the placebo-corrected change in the groups receiving 400 mg PHX1149 was -0.28% (p = 0.02). DPP4 inhibition on day 28 was 53, 73 and 78% at 24 h postdose in the groups receiving 100, 200 and 400 mg PHX1149, respectively. There were no differences in adverse events between PHX1149-treated and placebo subjects.
                Addition of the DPP4 inhibitor PHX1149 to a stable regimen of metformin or metformin plus a glitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes was well tolerated and improved blood glucose control. Fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) has recently been characterized as a potent metabolic regulator, but its pathophysiologic roles in humans remain unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone on plasma FGF-21 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                Thirty patients with new-onset T2DM (nT2DM), 34 type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycemic control (pT2DM) after the treatment with single hypoglycemic agent metformin, and 30 sex- and age-matched normal glycaemic controls (NGT) participated in the study. The pT2DM group was treated with rosiglitazone for 12 weeks. Plasma FGF-21 levels were measured with a RIA. The relationship between plasma FGF-21 levels and metabolic parameters was also analyzed.
                Fasting plasma FGF-21 levels were higher in nT2DM and pT2DM groups than in the control (1.81+/-0.64 vs 1.87+/-0.63 vs 1.52+/-0.61 microg/l, P<0.05), but there was no difference between nT2DM and pT2DM groups. Fasting plasma FGF-21 levels were decreased significantly in pT2DM group after the treatment with rosiglitazone compared with pre-treatment (1.59+/-0.63 vs 1.87+/-0.64 micro/l, P<0.05). In all diabetic patients, multiple regression analysis showed that HbA1c, fasting insulin, and homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance index were independently associated with plasma FGF-21 levels.
                In pT2DM patients, plasma FGF-21 levels are increased, but significantly decreased after the treatment with rosiglitazone on top of ongoing metformin therapy. These data suggest that rosiglitazone may play a role in lowering FGF-21 levels in T2DM patients. To investigate the mechanisms of action of metformin, insulin receptor binding and the activity of several insulin-controlled metabolic pathways were measured in adipocytes taken from 10 obese Type 2 diabetic patients treated for 4 weeks with either metformin (0.5 g x 3 daily) or matching placebo using a double-blind crossover design. Metformin therapy was associated with a significant fall in serum fructosamine levels (3.1 +/- 0.4 vs 2.8 +/- 0.4 mmol l-1, p less than 0.02) as well as fasting (10.8 +/- 2.4 vs 9.4 +/- 2.1 mmol l-1) and daytime (11.5 +/- 2.4 vs 10.0 +/- 2.2 mmol l-1) plasma glucose concentrations (p less than 0.05). Fasting and postprandial plasma levels of C-peptide and insulin were unchanged. While fasting plasma lactate concentrations remained unaltered after metformin, a rise was noted in response to meals (from 1.4 +/- 0.1 to 1.8 +/- 0.2 mmol l-1, p less than 0.05). Adipocyte insulin receptor binding was unaffected by drug treatment. Moreover, no insulin-like effects or post-binding potentiation of insulin action could be found on adipocyte glucose transport, glucose oxidation, lipogenesis, glycolysis or antilipolysis. A complementary in vitro study using adipocytes from non-obese healthy volunteers failed to show any direct effect of metformin on adipocyte insulin binding or glucose transport and metabolism, at media drug concentrations corresponding to therapeutic plasma levels. Complementary and alternative medicine use in adults with type 2 diabetes is popular. Although most of the herbs and supplements appear to be safe, there is still insufficient evidence that demonstrates their definitive beneficial effects. This study was done to determine whether the supplement of Agaricus blazei Murill extract improves insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes.
                This study was a clinical randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Of a population of 536 registered diabetes patients with 72 subjects (1) aged between 20 and 75 years, (2) being Chinese, (3) having type 2 diabetes for more than 1 year, and (4) having been taking gliclazide and metformin for more than 6 months were enrolled in this study. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to either receiving supplement of Agaricus blazei Murill (ABM) extract or placebo (cellulose) 1500 mg daily for 12 weeks. Homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was used as the major outcome measurement.
                At the end of the study, subjects who received supplement of ABM extract (n = 29) showed significantly lower HOMA-IR index (3.6[standard deviation, 2.5] versus 6.6[standard deviation, 7.4], p = 0.04) than the control group (n = 31). The plasma adiponectin concentration increased 20.0(standard deviation, 40.7)% in the ABM group after 12 weeks of treatment, but decreased 12.0(20.0)% among those taking the placebo (p < 0.001).
                Supplement of ABM extract improves insulin resistance among subjects with type 2 diabetes. The increase in adiponectin concentration after taking AMB extract for 12 weeks might be the mechanism that brings the beneficial effect. Studies with longer periods of follow-up should be conducted in the future. The extended-release formulation of metformin (MXR) prolongs drug absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract and permits once-daily dosing in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This newer formulation may enhance patient compliance with oral therapy compared to conventional immediate-release metformin (MIR) in T2DM.
                To analyse whether a switch from thrice daily MIR to once or twice daily MXR wouldachieve comparable degrees of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                We conducted an open study of the efficacy and tolerability of MXR in 40 patients with T2DM who had achieved moderate or good glycemic control with MIR alone or in combination with other antihyperglycemic agents. After a lead in period of 3 months patients were switched over to a specific brand of MIR at baseline (Visit 0). Patients were subsequently followed for 4 more visits. These visits were done monthly, after taking MIR in a dose of 1-2 g/day (Visit 1); MXR as a single dose at dinner but 0.5 g less than baseline dose of MIR (Visit 2); MXR, 1-2 g/day as a single dose at bedtime, with strength same as that of baseline dose of MIR (Visit 3); and MXR, 1-2 g/day in two divided doses keeping dose same as baseline MIR (Visit 4). Glycemic control was assessed by a four-point glucose profile (fasting and three postprandial levels) at each visit.
                At visit 2, when patients had been on 500 mg lesser dose of MXR for 1 month, glucose profile worsened. However, glycemic control, at visit 3, returned to earlier levels when dose of MXR was increased back to original dose. Overall the MXR formulation was well tolerated with minor gastrointestinal adverse effects, reported by only 3 patients.
                Patients with T2DM who had been receiving thrice-daily MIR achieved comparable glycemic control when therapy was switched to once- or twice-daily MXR at the same total daily dose. Fifty-seven type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome and on insulin were assessed by a paired analysis before and 6 months after addition of metformin as combination therapy to evaluate the impact of the association on glycemic control, blood pressure, and lipid profile. This was a historical cohort study in which the files of type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome on insulin were reviewed. The body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, lipid profile, A1C level, fasting blood glucose level, daily dose of NPH insulin, systolic blood pressure, and diastolic blood pressure were assessed in each patient before the start of metformin and 6 months after the initiation of combination therapy. Glycemic control significantly improved (P < 0.001) after the addition of metformin (1404.4 +/- 565.5 mg/day), with 14% of the 57 patients reaching A1C levels up to 7%, and 53% reaching values up to 8%. There was a statistically significant reduction (P < 0.05) of total cholesterol (229.0 +/- 29.5 to 214.2 +/- 25.0 mg/dL), BMI (30.7 +/- 5.4 to 29.0 +/- 4.0 kg/m2), waist circumference (124.6 +/- 11.7 to 117.3 +/- 9.3 cm), and daily necessity of insulin. The reduction of total cholesterol occurred independently of the reductions of A1C (9.65 +/- 1.03 to 8.18 +/- 1.01%) and BMI and the reduction of BMI and WC did not interfere with the improvement of A1C. In conclusion, our study showed the efficacy of the administration of metformin and insulin simultaneously without negative effects. No changes were detected in HDL-cholesterol or blood pressure. nan Most antidiabetic agents target only 1 of several underlying causes of diabetes. The complementary actions of the antidiabetic agents metformin hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate may maintain optimal glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes; therefore, their combined use may be indicated for patients whose diabetes is poorly controlled by metformin alone.
                To evaluate the efficacy of metformin-rosiglitazone therapy in patients whose type 2 diabetes is inadequately controlled with metformin alone.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from April 1997 and March 1998.
                Thirty-six outpatient centers in the United States.
                Three hundred forty-eight patients aged 40 to 80 years with a mean fasting plasma glucose level of 12.0 mmol/L (216 mg/dL), a mean glycosylated hemoglobin level of 8.8%, and a mean body mass index of 30.1 kg/m2 were randomized.
                Patients were assigned to receive 2.5 g/d of metformin plus placebo (n = 116); 2.5 g/d of metformin plus 4 mg/d of rosiglitazone (n = 119); or 2.5 g/d of metformin and 8 mg/d of rosiglitazone (n = 113) for 26 weeks.
                Glycosylated hemoglobin levels, fasting plasma glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function, compared between baseline and week 26, by treatment group.
                Glycosylated hemoglobin levels, fasting plasma glucose levels, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function improved significantly with metformin-rosiglitazone therapy in a dose-dependent manner. The mean levels of glycosylated hemoglobin decreased by 1.0% in the 4 mg/d metformin-rosiglitazone group and by 1.2% in the 8 mg/d metformin-rosiglitazone group and fasting plasma glucose levels by 2.2 mmol/L (39.8 mg/dL) and 2.9 mmol/L (52.9 mg/dL) compared with the metformin-placebo group (P<.001 for all). Of patients receiving 8 mg/d of metformin-rosiglitazone, 28.1% achieved a glycosylated hemoglobin level of 7% or less [corrected]. Dose-dependent increases in body weight and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were observed (P<.001 for both rosiglitazone groups vs placebo). The proportion of patients reporting adverse experiences was comparable across all groups.
                Our data suggest that combination treatment with once-daily metformin-rosiglitazone improves glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function more effectively than treatment with metformin alone. This study was based on the clinical observation of a higher phenprocoumon requirement in these diabetic patients simultaneously treated with phenprocoumon (Marcoumar) and dimethylbiguanide (DMB), and of a drug interaction observed in a patient. These higher requirements of phenprocoumon, suggesting an increased elimination, could have been due to an enhancement of liver microsomal enzyme activity and/or an increase in liver blood flow. Various studies were performed to test this hypothesis. The clinically suggested higher phenprocoumon requirement was proven by a drug observation study. Hence a higher tablet consumption of phenprocoumon and a diminished anticoagulatory effect was found after treatment with DMB in doses of between 1 and 3 g. An increased elimination of phenprocoumon following DMB administration was also found in a pharmacokinetic study. The activity of the liver microsomal enzyme system, investigated in animal and man, showed no changes in the liver microsomal enzymes in animal studies or the in vivo parameters of liver microsomal enzyme activity in patients. Measuring liver blood flow in dogs, utilizing the indocyanine green clearance method, an increased flow of about 33% was observed. As changes in liver blood flow can increase the metabolism of some highly lipid soluble drugs, the increased metabolism of phenprocoumon during DMB treatment could be related to the increase in liver blood flow and not to changes in liver microsomal enzyme activity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) To compare the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin and metformin initial combination therapy with individual monotherapies in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                This was a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study. Treatment-naive patients with T2DM who had a glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) of 7.5-11% (N = 1179) were randomized equally to receive vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy (50 mg + 1000 mg twice daily), vildagliptin plus low-dose metformin combination therapy (50 mg + 500 mg twice daily), vildagliptin monotherapy (50 mg twice daily) or high-dose metformin monotherapy (1000 mg twice daily). The primary objective was to demonstrate that HbA(1c) reduction from baseline with either combination therapy is superior to both monotherapies at the week 24 endpoint. Patients who failed glycaemic-screening criteria [HbA(1c )>11% or fasting plasma glucose (FPG) >15 mmol/l (270 mg/dl)] could enter a 24-week, single-arm substudy. These patients (N = 94) received open-label vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy (100 mg + 1000 mg twice daily).
                From comparable baseline values (8.6-8.7%), HbA(1c) decreased in all four treatment groups, to the greatest extent with vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy. Mean (SE) HbA(1c) change from baseline was -1.8% (0.06%), -1.6% (0.06%), -1.1% (0.06%) and -1.4% (0.06%) with vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy, vildagliptin plus low-dose metformin combination therapy, and vildagliptin and metformin monotherapies respectively. The between-group difference was superior with vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy (p < 0.001 vs. both monotherapies) and vildagliptin plus low-dose metformin combination therapy (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, vs. vildagliptin and metformin monotherapies, respectively). Higher baseline HbA(1c) values were linked to greater HbA(1c) reductions, with changes of -3.2% (0.22%), -2.7% (0.22%), -1.5% (0.24%) and -2.6% (0.26%) respectively, occurring in patients with baseline HbA(1c)>or=10%. Reductions in FPG were superior with vildagliptin plus high-dose metformin combination therapy [change from baseline -2.63 (0.13) mmol/l] compared with both monotherapies [-1.26 (0.13) mmol/l and -1.92 (0.13) mmol/l, respectively; p < 0.001]. There was no incidence of hypoglycaemia or severe hypoglycaemia with either combination therapy, and neither was associated with weight gain. All treatments were well tolerated and displayed a comparable incidence of adverse events overall. Despite superior HbA(1c) lowering, the vildagliptin plus low-dose metformin combination therapy group demonstrated a favourable gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability profile compared with metformin monotherapy.
                In treatment-naive patients, combinations of vildagliptin and both high-dose and low-dose metformin provide superior efficacy to monotherapy treatments with a comparable overall tolerability profile and low risk of hypoglycaemia. The potential dose-sparing effect of adding vildagliptin to low-dose metformin in preference to the up-titration of metformin may allow patients to achieve equivalent or superior HbA(1c) lowering without the GI tolerability issues associated with higher doses of metformin. To determine the effectiveness of the combination therapy with daytime chlorpropamide-metformin and bedtime NPH insulin in the treatment of secondary failures in NIDDM and to study its effects on insulin secretion.
                Non randomized open study with a duration of two months. The patients were followed six months after ending the study. INSTITUTION: Department of Diabetes and Lipid Metabolism. Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Mexico City. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PATIENTS: Nine patients (seven women and two men) were included. All had NIDDM and secondary failure to antidiabetic oral drugs. Their fasting plasma glucose was 14.5 +/- 2 mM/L and their HbA1c 13.37 +/- 2.9%. At the entry and at the end of the study a 5h-OGTT was done with assays of plasma glucose and C-peptide.
                Chlorpropamide (375 mg/day) plus metformin (1200 mg/day) and bedtime insulin (0.1 U/kg/day).
                After two months on combination therapy, fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c levels were remarkably improved (decreases of 7.3 +/- 0.6 and 9.1 +/- 1.02 respectively, p less than 0.002). The insulin dose was small (6.77 +/- 2.09 U/day). Side effects were minimal and infrequent. During the 5h-OGTT, the mean glucose area under the curve also decreased. The insulin secretion did not change but the C-peptide/glucose ratio increased. At the end of the study, the insulin dose was tapered off and stopped when possible. The four patients with the best glycemic control during the study were able to suspend the bedtime insulin and maintain a good control six months after the insulin suspension.
                The combination therapy is useful in the treatment of secondary failures in NIDDM: Its advantages are the very low mean daily insulin dose needed, the low incidence of side effects and, if a HbA1c less than 8.7% is achieved, the restoration of oral antidiabetic drugs efficacy. The very low insulin dose used in this study could be explained by complementary effects of metformin and bedtime insulin on hepatic glucose output and a putative decrease in peripheral resistance attributable both to sulfonylurea and metformin. This study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled with a combination of immediate- or extended-release metformin and a thiazolidinedione.
                This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 2-arm study consisting of a 4-week stabilization and eligibility period and a 26-week treatment period. Patients with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for a minimum of 1 year received glimepiride (titrated sequentially from 2 to 4 to 8 mg/d over 6 weeks, followed by 20 weeks of maintenance therapy) or placebo in combination with an established regimen of immediate- or extended release metformin and rosiglitazone or pioglitazone. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline. The safety analysis was based on the incidence of hypo glycemia, adverse events, and laboratory abnormalities. Changes in lipid levels (high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides) were evaluated, and health-related quality of life was assessed based on scores on the Diabetes Care Profile (DCP) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HU13).
                Of 170 randomized patients, 159 were included in the efficacy analysis and 168 were included in the safety analysis. Demographic variables were similar at baseline between the glimepiride and placebo groups (mean age, 56.5 and 56.4 years, respectively; percent men/women, 61.0%/39.0% and 62.3%/37.7%; weight, 100.9 and 96.3 kg). HbA(1c) was significantly improved at end point with glimepiride combination therapy compared with placebo (mean [SE], -1.31% [0.08] vs -0.33% [0.08], respectively; P < 0.001). The majority of patients (62.2%) who received glimepiride achieved an HbA(1c) value of < or =7%, compared with 26.0% of patients receiving placebo (P < 0.001 between groups). At end point, the adjusted mean differences between treatments significantly favored the glimepiride combination in terms of fasting plasma glucose (-37.4 [4.0] mg/dL; P < 0.001), fasting insulin (4.06 [1.69] microIU/mL; P < 0.03), and C-peptide (124.5 [35.9] pmol/L; P < 0.001). The adjusted mean changes in body mass index from baseline to end point were 1.26 (0.16) kg/m(2) with glimepiride and 0.17 (0.16) kg/m(2) with placebo (P < 0.001). Similarly, the mean change in weight was greater with glimepiride than with placebo (3.76 [0.54] vs 0.45 [0.52] kg; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in lipid levels between groups. Clinically significant adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, and rates of severe hypoglycemia were similar between treatment groups. The overall incidence of hypoglycemia, however, was 51.2% in the glimepiride group and 8.3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). In general, there was no significant difference between treatment groups with respect to scores on the DCP or HUI3 over the study period.
                In these patients with type 2 diabetes that was not adequately controlled by dual combination therapy with metformin and a thiazolidinedione, the addition of glimepiride improved glycemic control compared with placebo with an acceptable tolerability profile. Although there were significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia with triple therapy than with dual therapy and placebo, the risk for severe hypoglycemia was low. nan Metformin is the most commonly prescribed oral antidiabetic agent in the U.S. for adults with type 2 diabetes. The incidence of type 2 diabetes in children has increased dramatically over the past 10 years, and yet, metformin has never been formally studied in children with type 2 diabetes.
                This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of metformin at doses up to 1,000 mg twice daily in 82 subjects aged 10-16 years for up to 16 weeks in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial from September 1998 to November 1999. Subjects with type 2 diabetes were enrolled if they had a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels > or =7.0 and < or =13.3 mmol/l (> or =126 and < or =240 mg/dl), HbA(1c) > or =7.0%, stimulated C-peptide > or =0.5 nmol/l (> or =1.5 ng/ml), and a BMI > 50th percentile for age.
                Metformin significantly improved glycemic control. At the last double-blind visit, the adjusted mean change from baseline in FPG was -2.4 mmol/l (-42.9 mg/dl) for metformin compared with +1.2 mmol/l (+21.4 mg/dl) for placebo (P < 0.001). Mean HbA(1c) values, adjusted for baseline levels, were also significantly lower for metformin compared with placebo (7.5 vs. 8.6%, respectively; P < 0.001). Improvement in FPG was seen in both sexes and in all race subgroups. Metformin did not have a negative impact on body weight or lipid profile. Adverse events were similar to those reported in adults treated with metformin.
                Metformin was shown to be safe and effective for treatment of type 2 diabetes in pediatric patients. The endothelium plays a pivotal role in the regulation of vascular tone by releasing nitric oxide (NO). Increased availability of L-arginine, the natural precursor of NO, induces vasodilatation and inhibits platelet activity. We studied the effect of metformin on hemodynamic and rheological responses to L-arginine in patients with NIDDM.
                Ten newly diagnosed NIDDM patients with mild fasting hyperglycemia (7.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/l) and without evidence of both micro- and macrovascular complications were investigated. They received an intravenous infusion of L-arginine (1 g/min for 30 min) with evaluation of plasma glucose and insulin, systolic (sBP) and diastolic (dBP) blood pressure, heart rate and plasma catecholamines, platelet aggregation, and blood viscosity and filterability. The L-arginine test was repeated after an 8-week treatment with metformin (850 mg b.i.d.).
                Metformin treatment significantly reduced basal fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, and platelet aggregation to ADP (P < 0.05); the other parameters did not change. During pretreatment test, L-arginine infusion decreased sBP (from 137 +/- 4.1 to 129 +/- 4.5 mmHg, P < 0.01) and dBP (from 79 +/- 1.9 to 75 +/- 1.2 mmHg, P < 0.01) without affecting heart rate or plasma catecholamines. Both platelet aggregation and blood viscosity showed significant decrements after L-arginine, while blood filterability did not change. After metformin treatment, the decrease in blood pressure after L-arginine infusion was significantly enhanced, with a maximal decrease of sBP of 12 +/- 3.4 mmHg (8 +/- 2.5 mmHg pretreatment, P < 0.05) and dBP of 9.5 +/- 2.4 mmHg (4.5 +/- 1.9 mmHg pretreatment, P < 0.01). Heart rate, plasma norepinephrine levels, and blood filterability also rose significantly (P < 0.05-0.01). The decrease in both platelet aggregation and blood viscosity after L-arginine was significantly amplified after metformin.
                We conclude that L-arginine infusion in newly diagnosed NIDDM patients without vascular complications produces relevant hemodynamic and theological changes, which are amplified by an 8-week treatment with metformin. Whether these vascular effects of metformin will improve the poor cardiovascular outlook of the diabetic patient is still unknown. To compare the therapeutic potential of acarbose, metformin, or placebo as first line treatment in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
                Ninety-six patients with NIDDM (35-70 years of age, body mass index (BMI) < or = 35 kg/m2, insufficiently treated with diet alone, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c; 7% to 11%) were randomized into 3 groups and treated for 24 weeks with acarbose, 3 x 100 mg/day, or metformin, 2 x 850 mg/day, or placebo. Efficacy, based on HbA1c (primary efficacy criterion), fasting blood glucose (BG) and insulin, 1 hour postprandial BG and insulin (after standard meal test), postprandial insulin increase, plasma lipid profile, and tolerability, based on subjective symptoms and laboratory values were determined every 6 weeks. Analysis of covariance was performed for endvalues with adjustment on baseline values. Ninety-four patients were valid for efficacy evaluation.
                Both active drugs showed the same improvement of efficacy criteria compared with placebo. Baseline adjusted means at endpoint were as follows: BG, fasting and 1 hour postprandial, 9.2 mM and 10.9 mM with placebo, 7.6 mM and 8.7 mM with acarbose, and 7.8 mM and 9.0 mM with metformin; HbA1c was 9.8% with placebo, 8.5% with acarbose, and 8.7% with metformin. Comparisons: acarbose versus placebo and metformin versus placebo were statistically significant, but not acarbose versus metformin. No effect on fasting insulin could be observed. Relative postprandial insulin increase was 1.90 with placebo, 1.09 with acarbose, and 1.03 with metformin. Comparisons: acarbose versus placebo and metformin versus placebo were statistically significant, but not acarbose versus metformin. With respect to lipid profile, acarbose was superior to metformin. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol ratio increased by 14.4% with placebo, was unchanged with metformin, but decreased by 26.7% with acarbose. Comparisons: acarbose versus placebo and acarbose versus metformin were statistically significant, but not metformin versus placebo. Slight body weight changes were observed with acarbose (-0.8 kg) and metformin (-0.5 kg), but not with placebo. Acarbose led to mild or moderate intestinal symptoms in 50% of the patients within the first 4 weeks, but in only 13.8% of the patients within the last 4 weeks.
                Acarbose and metformin are effective drugs for the first line monotherapy of patients with NIDDM. With respect to plasma lipid profile, especially HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and LDL/HDL cholesterol ratio acarbose may be superior to metformin. nan The combination of a sulfonylurea with a biguanide improves the pancreatic beta-cell insulin secretion and the insulin utilization in peripheral tissues in NIDDM. This open, crossover, randomised and prospective study was designed to compare the effects of the fixed combination glibenclamide-metformin (GL-METF)-2.5 and 400 mg respectively, with the fixed combination glibenclamide-phenformin (GL-PHEN)-2.5 and 25 mg respectively, on NIDDM diabetes control. Thirty NIDDM patients, in ideal metabolic control, who were being treated with GL-PHEN were divided in two groups. One group received GL-PHEN for 12 weeks followed by 12 weeks treatment with GL-METF and the reverse treatment was given to the second group. A statistically significant decrease of post-prandial blood glucose (p = 0.034) and glycosylated haemo-globin (p < 0.02) values was observed under GL-METF treatment compared to those with GL-PHEN. The values of lactic acid were within normal limits during both treatments. The insulin secretion after breakfast was similar with both drug compounds. The BMI of the patients remained the same during a follow-up study of 24 weeks. Lipid metabolism did not change significantly during the trial and the safety parameters (renal and liver function, full blood count) remained unchanged. In conclusion, the administration of GL-METF leads to better diabetes control in NIDDM patients compared to that of GL-PHEN. The effects of metformin therapy on whole body and splanchnic amino acid turnover are not known. Therefore, we have studied fasting and postprandial phenylalanine kinetics in type 2 diabetic subjects (non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus), previously treated with diet only, both before and after 4 weeks of either metformin (850 mg twice a day) (n = 11) or placebo administration (n = 6). Phenylalanine kinetic was evaluated by means of a multiple isotope technique: tritiated phenylalanine was infused i.v., whereas carbon-labeled phenylalanine was incorporated into a chemically-defined meal. Compared with placebo, metformin administration decreased both fasting (from 162 +/- 17 to 141 +/- 20 mg/dl) and postprandial (from 217 +/- 20 to 164 +/- 20 mg/dl) glucose concentrations (P < 0.05-P < 0.01). Fasting insulin concentrations were unaffected, but postmeal insulin tended to be lower (P < 0.06) after metformin. Compared with the pretreatment period, metformin administration did not change total phenylalanine rate of appearance (fasted state, 0.74 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.71 +/- 0.08 mumol/kg.min; fed state, 0.77 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.75 +/- 0.08 mumol/kg.min, respectively), dietary and endogenous phenylalanine rate of appearance, dietary phenylalanine oxidation, and splanchnic uptake, similar to what was observed in the placebo group. Our data indicate that, at least after a 4-week treatment, metformin does not affect fasting and postprandial protein turnover, as indicated by phenylalanine data, in subjects with mild non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Metformin is the 'drug-of-first-choice' in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) due to its antihyperglycaemic and cardiovascular protective potentials. In non-obese patients with T2DM, insulin secretagogues are empirically used as first choice. In this investigator-initiated trial, we evaluated the effect of metformin vs. an insulin secretagogue, repaglinide on glycaemic regulation and markers of inflammation and insulin sensitivity in non-obese patients with T2DM.
                A single-centre, double-masked, double-dummy, crossover study during 2 x 4 months involved 96 non-obese (body mass index < or = 27 kg/m(2)) insulin-naïve patients with T2DM. At enrolment, previous oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHA) were stopped and patients entered a 1-month run-in on diet-only treatment. Hereafter, patients were randomized to either repaglinide 2 mg thrice daily followed by metformin 1 g twice daily or vice versa each during 4 months with 1-month washout between interventions.
                End-of-treatment levels of haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose, mean of seven-point home-monitored plasma glucose and fasting levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and adiponectin were not significantly different between treatments. However, body weight, waist circumference, fasting serum levels of insulin and C-peptide were lower and less number of patients experienced hypoglycaemia during treatment with metformin vs. repaglinide. Both drugs were well tolerated.
                In non-obese patients with T2DM, overall glycaemic regulation was equivalent with less hypoglycaemia during metformin vs. repaglinide treatment for 2 x 4 months. Metformin was more effective targeting non-glycaemic cardiovascular risk markers related to total and abdominal body fat stores as well as fasting insulinaemia. These findings may suggest the use of metformin as the preferred OHA also in non-obese patients with T2DM. Hepatic steatosis occurs in up to 78% of patients with type 2 diabetes. Studies evaluating the effect of metformin on hepatic steatosis are conflicting. Insulin is believed to be detrimental due to its lipogenic effect. Since insulin-metformin combination is commonly used for the treatment of diabetes, it is important to assess the effect of this combined therapy on hepatic steatosis. We evaluated the change in hepatic steatosis following the initiation of insulin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                Newly diagnosed treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes had their hepatic triglyceride (TG) content measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy at baseline and after 3 months of treatment with BiAsp 30 insulin, in combination with metformin. Insulin was administered twice daily and titrated to achieve normal capillary blood glucose levels. Metformin was titrated during the first month from 500 mg daily to 1000 mg bid.
                The average hepatic TG content in 19 enrolled subjects was 11.83+/-7.61% (range, 0.93-23.16%) and correlated with body mass index (r=.567). Three months of treatment reduced hepatic steatosis by 45%, with 75% of the study subjects achieving a normal level. The change in hepatic TG content was partially explained by changes in HbA1c (P=.006) and cholesterol (P=.003) levels.
                The combined treatment with insulin and metformin significantly reduced hepatic steatosis in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), biomarkers reflecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction have been linked to cardiovascular disease (CVD biomarkers) and metabolic regulation. In T2DM patients, metformin and insulin secretagogues have demonstrated equal anti-hyperglycaemic potency. Here, we report the effect of metformin versus an insulin secretagogue, repaglinide, on CVD biomarkers in non-obese T2DM patients.
                Single-centre, double-masked, double-dummy, crossover study during 2x4 months involving 96 non-obese (body mass index< or =27 kg/m(2)) insulin-naïve T2DM patients. At enrolment, previous oral hypoglycaemic agents were stopped and the patients entered a 1-month run-in on diet-only treatment. Hereafter, patients were randomized to either 2 mg repaglinide thrice daily followed by 1 g metformin twice daily or vice versa each during 4 months with a 1-month washout between interventions.
                Levels of tumour necrosis factor-alpha, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen, tissue-type plasminogen activator antigen, von Willebrand factor, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 and soluble E-selectin were significantly lower during metformin versus repaglinide treatments. In contrast, Amadori albumin and heart rate were higher during metformin versus repaglinide. Levels of interleukin-6, fibrinogen, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, asymmetric dimethylarginine and advanced glycation end products as well as glycaemic levels (previously reported) and 24-h blood pressure were similar between treatments. Adjustment for known macrovascular disease did not affect the between-treatment effects.
                In non-obese T2DM patients, metformin was more effective in reducing selected biomarkers reflecting inflammation and endothelial dysfunction compared with repaglinide despite similar glycaemic levels between treatments. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of vildagliptin added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A multicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 24-week study in patients inadequately controlled with metformin (HbA(1c) 7.5-11%) was designed. Patients were randomized to vildagliptin (Galvus) 100 mg given in the morning (AM), vildagliptin 100 mg given in the evening (PM), or placebo. The primary objective was to demonstrate that HbA(1c) reduction with once-daily vildagliptin 100 mg AM dosing is superior to placebo. Change from baseline to study endpoint in adjusted mean (SE) HbA(1c) improved significantly with vildagliptin AM dosing (-0.66 [0.11] versus 0.17% [0.11] with placebo; p <0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that HbA(1c) reduction from baseline was greatest in those patients who had the highest baseline HbA(1c) levels. According to a predefined set of response criteria, the percentage of responder patients was significantly greater in the vildagliptin AM dosing group than in the placebo group for all responder definitions. Further analysis also revealed comparable efficacy between AM and PM dosing. Body weight remained generally stable in the combined vildagliptin group (+0.06 kg) and decreased with placebo (-0.69 kg); the incidence of adverse events was similar with vildagliptin AM dosing and placebo (30.4 and 34.4%, respectively). Vildagliptin 100 mg given as a morning dose is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, and is equally efficacious when given as either a morning or evening dose. To compare the effectiveness of alternative combined treatments in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) with secondary failure to sulfonylureas.
                A crossover study was carried out by randomly assigning 16 NIDDM patients to a combined treatment with the addition of either a single low-dose bedtime injection of 0.2 U/kg body wt NPH insulin or an oral three times a day administration of 1.5 g/day metformin to the previously ineffective glyburide treatment.
                Both combined therapies significantly (P less than 0.01) reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG) and percentage of HbA1. The addition of metformin was more effective than the addition of insulin (P less than 0.01) in improving PPPG in the 8 patients with higher post-glucagon C-peptide levels. In contrast, the efficacy of neither combined therapy was related to patient age, age of diabetes onset, duration of the disease, percentage of ideal body weight, and FPG. The addition of insulin but not metformin caused a significant (P less than 0.01) increase of mean body weight. Neither combined treatment caused changes in serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels. No symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was reported in any of the 16 patients.
                The addition of bedtime NPH insulin or metformin was effective in improving the glycemic control in most NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glyburide. The combination of metformin and sulfonylurea was more effective in reducing PPPG and did not induce any increase of body weight. The first part of the paper deals with the relationship between two inhibiting factors of the complex enzyme cascade regulating fibrinolysis, namely plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)). Blood concentrations of Lp(a), PAI-1 antigen (PAI-1 AG) and activity (PAI-1 AT), and the main parameters of lipo- and glyco-metabolic balance were studied in 80 type II diabetic patients. Roughly hyperbolic patterns have been found between PAI-1 and Lp(a). Negative statistically significant linear correlation can be elicited when Log PAI-1 AG and Log PAI-1 AT values are plotted versus Lp(a) values, the first one being particularly tight. These findings suggest a nearly on/off control of the two parameters, limiting the risk of hypofibrinolysis. The second part of the paper was aimed at verifying this hypothesis. A group of 30 diabetic patients were treated for 3 months with metformin, an antidiabetic biguanide compound which has been reported to reduce PAI-1 levels both in diabetic and in non-diabetic patients. Metformin significantly reduced PAI-1 AG and PAI-1 AT but did not influence plasma Lp(a) levels. A clear linear correlation between the basal Lp(a) values and the changes in PAI-1 AG levels was found. An even tighter correlation was elicited between the decrease in PAI-1, and PAI-1 pretreatment values. The treatment of NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylurea is a common problem. We performed a crossover study in 50 NIDDM patients with secondary failure to glibenclamide by comparing the addition to sulphonylurea of either a low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or a t.i.d. oral metformin and by analyzing treatment efficacy in relation to patient and disease characteristics. Both combined therapies clearly improved glycaemic control. HbA1 c were similarly reduced by the addition of either bedtime NPH insulin (7.6+/-0.34 vs 8.7+/-0.35, p<0.01) or metformin (7.6+/-0.22 vs 8.6+/-0.31, p<0.01). Also fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and post-prandial plasma glucose (PPPG) significantly decreased (p<0.01) with both treatments. Bed-time NPH insulin was more effective on FPG reduction than metformin (-36+/-2% vs -25+/-2%, p<0.01); in contrast, metformin addition was more effective on PPPG reduction than bedtime NPH insulin addition (-30+/-2% vs 20+/-3%, p<0.01). Serum cholesterol was marginally but significantly decreased after metformin (5.49+/-0.19 vs 5.91 +/-0.18 mM, p<0.05) but not after NPH insulin. Body weight increase was significantly greater after insulin addition than after metformin (1.47+/-0.25 Kg vs 0.64+/-0.17 p=0.02). All patients preferred the addition of metformin rather than NPH insulin. None of the measured clinical and metabolic variables (before treatment FPG and PPPG, HbA1 c, post-glucagon C-peptide levels, insulin sensitivity, patient age, BMI and diabetes duration) significantly correlated to the efficacy of the two combined treatments studied. In conclusion, in NIDDM patients with secondary failure to sulphonylureas the addition of either low-dose bedtime NPH insulin or t.i.d. metformin is similarly effective in improving glycaemic control. Metformin is better accepted by patients and provides a modest advantage in terms of body weight and cholesterol levels. The most common clinical and metabolic variables are not useful for predicting the efficacy of these two combined treatments. To compare the efficacy and safety of either continuing or discontinuing rosiglitazone + metformin fixed-dose combination when starting insulin therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral therapy.
                In this 24-week double-blind study, 324 individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on maximum dose rosiglitazone + metformin therapy were randomly assigned to twice-daily premix insulin therapy (target pre-breakfast and pre-evening meal glucose < or = 6.5 mmol/l) in addition to either rosiglitazone + metformin (8/2000 mg) or placebo.
                Insulin dose at week 24 was significantly lower with rosiglitazone + metformin (33.5 +/- 1.5 U/day, mean +/- se) compared with placebo [59.0 +/- 3.0 U/day; model-adjusted difference -26.6 (95% CI -37.7, -15,5) U/day, P < 0.001]. Despite this, there was greater improvement in glycaemic control [HbA(1c) rosiglitazone + metformin vs. placebo 6.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 7.5 +/- 0.1%; difference -0.7 (-0.8, -0.5)%, P < 0.001] and more individuals achieved glycaemic targets (HbA(1c) < 7.0% 70 vs. 34%, P < 0.001). The proportion of individuals reporting at least one hypoglycaemic event during the last 12 weeks of treatment was similar in the two groups (rosiglitazone + metformin vs. placebo 25 vs. 27%). People receiving rosiglitazone + metformin in addition to insulin reported greater treatment satisfaction than those receiving insulin alone. Both treatment regimens were well tolerated but more participants had oedema [12 (7%) vs. 4 (3%)] and there was more weight gain [3.7 vs. 2.6 kg; difference 1.1 (0.2, 2.1) kg, P = 0.02] with rosiglitazone + metformin.
                Addition of insulin to rosiglitazone + metformin enabled more people to reach glycaemic targets with less insulin, and was generally well tolerated. Adiponectin, an insulin-sensitizing factor secreted from adipose tissue, is decreased in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and increased in response to thiazolidinedione (TZD) therapy. Changes in its secretion and assembly into higher-order forms affect insulin sensitivity. To determine the relative potency of TZDs on intra-adipocyte multimerization and secretion of adiponectin, we assessed the impact of in vivo low- or high-dose rosiglitazone treatment alone or combined with metformin in subjects with T2D. T2D subjects received high-dose rosiglitazone (8 mg/day), high-dose metformin (2,000 mg/day), or low-dose combination rosiglitazone-metformin therapy (4 mg + 1,000 mg/day) for 4 mo. All subjects were then switched to high-dose rosiglitazone-metformin combination therapy (8 mg + 2,000 mg/day) for another 4 mo. Low-dose rosiglitazone increased serum adiponectin, whereas the high dose increased both adipocyte content and serum adiponectin levels. TZDs selectively increased the percentage of circulating adiponectin in the potent, high-molecular-weight (HMW) form. No TZD effects were evident on multimer distribution in the cell. Expression of the chaperone protein ERp44, which retains adiponectin within the cell, was decreased by TZD treatment. No changes occurred in Ero1-Lalpha expression. Metformin had no effect on any of these measures. Increases in adiponectin correlated with improvements in insulin sensitivity. In vivo, TZDs have apparent dose-dependent effects on cellular and secreted adiponectin. TZD-mediated improvements in whole body insulin sensitivity are associated with increases in circulating but not cellular levels of the HMW adiponectin multimer. Finally, TZDs promote the selective secretion of HMW adiponectin, potentially, in part, through decreasing the expression of the adiponectin-retaining protein ERp44. Treatment with thiazolidinediones (TZDs) produces weight gain.
                To test whether a portion control diet could prevent weight gain during treatment with pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).
                This 16-week randomized, open-label, parallel arm study compared three groups: (i) pioglitazone plus the American Diabetes Association diet (Pio + ADA); (ii) pioglitazone plus a portion control weight loss diet (Pio + PC); (iii) metformin plus the American Diabetes Association diet (Met + ADA). All participants received the same advice about calorie reduction, lifestyle change and exercise.
                Fifty-one men and women with T2DM, naive to TZDs, were randomized to a 16-week study. Pioglitazone (Pio) was titrated to a dose of 45 mg/day and metformin (Met) to a dose of 2 g/day. Fasting blood was collected for lipids, insulin and glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline and 16 weeks.
                Forty-eight of fifty-one randomized subjects completed the study. Patients treated with Pio + ADA gained 2.15 +/- 1.09 kg (mean +/- SD) compared with a weight loss of 2.59 +/- 1.25 kg (p < 0.05) in the Pio + PC group, and a weight loss of 3.21 +/- 0.7 kg (p < 0.05) in the Met + ADA group. Waist circumference and visceral adipose tissue decreased significantly more in the Pio + PC group than in the Pio + ADA group. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly increased in the Pio + PC group compared with the Met + ADA group. Pioglitazone reduced insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) more than metformin. No significant differences between groups were seen for glucose, insulin, HbA1c or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
                Pio + PC, prevented weight gain, reduced waist circumference and visceral fat compared with Pio + ADA diet. To assess the reversibility of the defect in glycogen synthase (GS) activity in skeletal muscle from obese patients with NIDDM treated with a hypocaloric diet and metformin.
                Eighteen obese patients newly diagnosed with NIDDM were included in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind parallel group trial and followed for 3 months. Euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp including indirect calorimetry and biopsy of m. vastus lateralis was performed before and after treatment with a hypocaloric diet plus metformin or placebo. The patients were studied at basal, low, and high insulin concentrations.
                The impaired GS activity in muscle biopsies was not reversed either by acute normalization of glycemia (for 8 h) or by chronic reduction of hyperglycemia by diet plus metformin. In both treatment groups, comparable effects on glycemic control and weight loss were found together with marked insulin suppression of nonesterified fatty acids and increased glucose oxidation. Total glucose disposal at euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp increased significantly in the metformin group by 25% at high insulin level (259 +/- 31 vs. 207 +/- 21 mg x m(-2) x min(-1), P < 0.05). An insignificant increase by 13% was found in the placebo group. There were no significant changes in nonoxidative glucose metabolism. GS activity and glucose utilization showed no significant differences between the two treatment groups when regression coefficients, expressed as incremental changes by increments of insulin, were compared.
                Defective GS activity in obese NIDDM patients is not secondary to hyperglycemia. Metformin and diet had no significant influence on GS activity. The added effect of metformin to that of a hypocaloric diet in improving insulin-stimulated glucose utilization is marginal when blood glucose reduction is obtained by weight loss. Many diabetic patients continue to have hyperglycaemia on maximal sulphonylurea therapy. Five different therapeutic options, with the prime aim of achieving normal fasting plasma glucose concentrations, have been compared in 15 asymptomatic, sulphonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic patients in a randomized crossover study of 8-week periods. In 24 h metabolic profiles the overnight mean (+/- 1SD) basal plasma glucose level on sulphonylurea therapy was 8.9 +/- 4.2 mmol/l. This was slightly improved with added metformin therapy (7.3 +/- 4.3 mmol/l, p = 0.013), but reduced to normal by added ultralente insulin (5.2 +/- 3.2 mmol/l, p less than 0.001), ultralente insulin alone (5.1 +/- 1.6 mmol/l, p = 0.005) or by ultralente and soluble insulin (4.7 +/- 1.4 mmol/l, p = 0.003). The mean glycosylated haemoglobin concentration was reduced significantly only by the treatments which included insulin. None of the patients had severe or incapacitating hypoglycaemia and only when on additional soluble insulin did patients show a significant gain in weight. Combining sulphonylurea therapy with ultralente insulin did not significantly improve overall glucose control over treatment with ultralente alone, although the insulin dose required to restore fasting normoglycaemia was significantly lower (median (interquartile range), 25 (12-41) versus 40 (27-80) U/day, p = 0.001). In type 2 diabetic patients who continue to have fasting hyperglycaemia on maximal sulphonylurea therapy, fasting normoglycaemia can be achieved easily, without minimal changes in diet or lifestyle, by means of a basal insulin supplement. We sought to examine the mechanisms by which the addition of glargine insulin or rosiglitazone improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic subjects poorly controlled on maximally effective doses of metformin plus sulfonylurea.
                Subjects (aged 47 +/- 11 years, BMI 31 +/- 5 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) [A1C] 9.4 +/- 1.3%) received bedtime glargine insulin (titrated based on the fasting plasma glucose [FPG], n = 10) or rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily, n = 10). At baseline and after 4 months, A1C was measured and an oral glucose tolerance test and a 3-h euglycemic insulin (80 mU/m(2) per min) clamp with [3-(3)H]glucose were performed.
                A1C and FPG decreased similarly in the glargine insulin (9.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.6 +/- 0.3% and 212 +/- 14 to 139 +/- 5 mg/dl, respectively, both P < 0.0001) and rosiglitazone (9.4 +/- 0.3 to 7.6 +/- 0.4% and 223 +/- 14 to 160 +/- 19 mg/dl, respectively, both P < 0.005) groups. After 4 months, endogenous glucose production (EGP) declined similarly with glargine insulin (2.27 +/- 0.10 to 1.73 +/- 0.12 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.0001) and rosiglitazone (2.21 +/- 0.12 to 1.88 +/- 0.12 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P = 0.01). The hepatic insulin resistance index declined in the rosiglitazone group (32 +/- 3 to 21 +/- 1 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1) x microU/ml, P = 0.03 vs. baseline and P < 0.05 vs. glargine insulin) and did not change in the glargine group (22 +/- 5 to 20 +/- 3 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1) x microU/ml, P = NS). At 4 months, glargine insulin (3.6 +/- 0.5 to 4.2 +/- 0.4 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.01) and rosiglitazone (2.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.3 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.0005) increased R(d), but the increment was greater in the rosiglitazone group (P < 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure was reduced only by rosiglitazone (P < 0.01).
                Triple therapy with glargine insulin or rosiglitazone similarly reduced A1C, primarily by suppressing basal EGP (hepatic). Glargine insulin reduced basal EGP by increasing plasma insulin levels, while rosiglitazone decreased basal hepatic glucose production by improving hepatic insulin sensitivity. To assess the effects of orlistat vs. placebo, in combination with a weight management programme, on weight loss and metabolic control in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes.
                Patients treated with either metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea were randomized to double-blind treatment with orlistat or placebo (120 mg) three times daily, combined with a mildly reduced calorie diet and a weight management programme for 52 weeks. Changes in body weight, anthropometry, glycaemic control and lipid profile were assessed.
                After 52 weeks, orlistat-treated patients achieved an almost threefold greater reduction in weight compared with placebo recipients (-5.0% vs. -1.8%; P<0.0001). The decrease in waist circumference was significantly greater with orlistat than placebo (-4.8 cm vs. -2.8 cm; P=0.0022). Orlistat treatment was also associated with significantly greater reductions in haemoglobin A(1c) (-1.1% vs. -0.2%; P<0.0001), fasting plasma glucose (-1.9 mmol/l vs. -0.3 mmol/l; P<0.0001), total cholesterol (-0.2 mmol/l vs. 0.1 mmol/l; P=0.03) and apolipoprotein B (-0.08 g/l vs. 0.01 g/l; P=0.0085) and greater improvements in beta-cell function (P=0.031) and insulin resistance (P=0.001) assessed using the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). Similar results were obtained for subgroups of patients treated with metformin alone or metformin in combination with sulphonylurea. Orlistat treatment reduced the requirement for anti-diabetic medication more than placebo.
                Orlistat, in combination with a reduced calorie diet and a weight management programme, promotes weight loss and clinically relevant improvements in glycaemic control and other cardiovascular risk factors in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes. Metformin is considered the gold standard for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy and in combination with sulphonylureas and insulin. The combination of metformin with thiazolidinediones is less well studied. The aim of the present study was to assess the differential effect, and tolerability, of metformin combined with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone on glucose, coagulation and fibrinolysis parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome.
                This 12-month, multicentre, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial was conducted at three study sites in Italy. We assessed patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (duration >or=6 months) and with metabolic syndrome. All patients were required to have poor glycaemic control with diet, or experienced adverse effects with diet and metformin, administered up to the maximum tolerated dose. Patients were randomized to receive either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone self-administered for 12 months. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycaemic control [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels (FPG, PPG, FPI, and PPI respectively), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index], lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG)], lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] and homocysteine (HCT) at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment.
                No BMI change was observed at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months in either group. Significant HbA(1c) decreases were observed at 9 and 12 months in both groups. After 9 and 12 months, mean FPG and PPG levels decreased in both groups. Decreases in FPI and PPI were observed at 9 and 12 months compared with the baseline in both groups. Furthermore, in both groups, the HOMA index improved but only at 12 months. Significant TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG improvement was present in the pioglitazone group at 12 months compared with the baseline values, and these variations were significantly different between groups. No TC, LDL-C, TG improvement was present in the rosiglitazone group after 12 months. Significant Lp(a) and HCT improvement was present in the pioglitazone group at 12 months compared with the baseline values, and Lp(a) change was significant compared with the rosiglitazone group. Significant HCT decrease was observed in the rosiglitazone group at the end of the study. In our type 2 diabetic patients, both drugs were safe and effective for glycaemic control and improving HCT plasma levels. However, long-term treatment with metformin plus pioglitazone significantly reduced Lp(a) plasma levels, whereas metformin + rosiglitazone did not.
                For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome, combined treatment with metformin and rosiglitazone or pioglitazone is safe and effective, However, the pioglitazone combination also reduced the plasma Lp(a) levels whereas the rosiglitazone combination did not. The main causes of reduced glucose levels during metformin therapy appear to be an increase in insulin action in peripheral tissues and reduced hepatic glucose output due to inhibition gluconeogenesis.
                The purpose of the study was to establish the effect of metformin on fasting and postprandial insulin secretion.
                The study carried out was double blind, controlled, comparative, randomized, multicentric, including two groups of out-patient department (OPD) patients. 43 patients were administered metformin (Tefor ICN Canada), and 46 patients were given placebo. Patients enrolled in the study were newly diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM) type 2, glycaemia < 12 mmol/l, and had the Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. Before treatment, blood biochemistry was done: fasting and postprandial glycaemia, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) value, fasting and postprandial insulinaemia, blood lipids (total cholesterol, total triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and LDL cholesterol), and gamma glutaryl transferase (GGT) level. BMI was also established. After 42 days of treatment, fasting and postprandial insulinaemia were tested again. Analysis of the effects of therapy, and identification of co-variants for fasting and postprandial insulinaemia, were done by ANOVA two way and ANCOVA method.
                It was shown that metformin accompanied by diet, as compared to placebo accompanied by diet, lowered the fasting insulinaemia value during six weeks of therapy in obese patients with DM type 2 (24.392 mU/l vs. 25.667 mU/l), interacting both with BMI pre-therapy, and interacting with fasting insulinaemia pre-therapy (p < 0.001). A significant effect of the interaction of covariants BMI and GGT was defined. As for the effect of therapy on postprandial insulinaemia, it was found that there was a high statistical significance of the effect of BMI interacting with initial values for postprandial insulinaemia before therapy, and interacting with therapy (p < 0.01). Adjusted mean values for postprandial insulinaemia after therapy in the placebo group were lower as compared to the metformin group (44.807 mU/l vs. 47.114 mU/l).
                It can be concluded that, as compared to place- bo, metformin is more efficient in reducing insulin resistance in obese patients with DM type 2. In addition, as compared to placebo, metformin maintains more efficient productive insulin secretion, indicating that metformin protects the pancreas from beta cell depletion. Obese type II diabetic patients are often treated with metformin after full doses of sulfonylureas or insulin fail to achieve a satisfactory metabolic control. Clinical practice has often indicated that metformin has little effect on normal weight type II diabetics. The effectiveness of metformin vs placebo was evaluated in a double blind cross-over study on 53 type II diabetic patients with unsatisfactory glycaemic control. The patients were divided into two groups-the sulfonylurea-treated (S) and the insulin treated (I). Each group was then subdivided into three classes: 1) normal weight [BMI less than 25], 2) overweight [BMI 25-30] and 3) obese [BMI greater than 30]. Metformin did not modify body weight, plasma lipids or insulin profiles. Blood lactate increased slightly but only occasionally reached statistical significance. Metformin's antidiabetic activity was not influenced by the basal treatment (S or I) of the diabetics but was strongly linked to the degree of adiposity. Indeed both plasma glucose and HbA1 remained almost unchanged in normal weight patients. In the overweight and in the obese metformin significantly improved glycaemic profiles and reduced HbA1 levels. These results confirm clinical experience indicating that some degree of adiposity is a necessary prerequisite for metformin efficacy in diabetics. Free fatty acids (FFAs) are linked to impaired insulin action, but their role in mediating long-term insulin sensitization during diabetes treatment is unclear.
                To examine the effect of pioglitazone addition to existing therapy on FFA dynamics and insulin action.
                Two 2-year, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, double-dummy, clinical trials.
                One hundred and seventy-one centres in Europe, Australia and Canada.
                Male and female patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately managed with metformin or sulfonylurea.
                Patients were randomized to pioglitazone (15-45 mg day(-1); n=319) or metformin (850-2550 mg day(-1); n=320) as add-on therapy to gliclazide or pioglitazone (n=317) versus gliclazide (80-320 mg day(-1); n=313) as add-on therapy to metformin.
                Plasma FFA profiles during oral glucose tolerance tests in selected centres before and during treatment (n=588).
                At Week 104, pioglitazone treatment decreased fasting FFAs by 0.08 mmol L(-1) when added to sulfonylurea and by 0.11 mmol L(-1) when added to metformin versus the respective sulfonylurea + metformin groups (0.03 mmol L(-1), P=0.05 and 0.04 mmol L(-1), P<0.05), and this was accompanied by significant improvements in fasting adipose tissue insulin sensitivity. Changes in postchallenge FFAs were similar between groups and not related to changes in liver transaminases, insulin action and secretion. However, the sensitivity of FFA to insulin was affected by treatment (P<0.001) and visit (P<0.05). Insulin sensitivity of FFA rose when pioglitazone was added to sulfonylurea (P<0.05), but decreased for gliclazide + metformin (P<0.05).
                Long-term improvements in adipose tissue insulin sensitivity and reduction in fasting FFAs with pioglitazone may help to reduce lipotoxicity in Type 2 diabetes. The efficacy of various regimens of initial insulin treatment in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes was compared with regard to diurnal glucose variation.
                Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Insulin therapy initiated on hospital wards, follow-up as outpatients for 12 months.
                Fifty-two type 2 diabetic patients (HbA1c >7.5%, mean 9.8%) on maximal oral therapy. Interventions. Insulin only (IO), bedtime insulin with sulphonylurea (glipizide) (IS), or bedtime insulin with metformin (IM).
                HbA1c and body weight.
                HbA1c decreased on average by 1.8, 1.0 and 1.5 percentage points in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively (p always <0.025). Body weight increased, most in the IO patients (+6.2 kg), least in the IM patients (+3.4 kg). Analysing all treatment groups combined, a similar HbA1c reduction was observed in patients with overall hyperglycaemia (low fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio) and in patients with fasting hyperglycaemia (high fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio). Within the overall hyperglycaemia group, the IS and IM patients had smaller decreases in HbA1c (-1.5 and -1.3 percentage points, respectively) than the IO patients (-2.7 percentage points). On the other hand, within the fasting hyperglycaemia group HbA1c reductions were -1.2, -0.8 and -1.5 percentage points, in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively.
                Not all poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients should automatically be treated with an oral agent and bedtime insulin. Two daily insulin injections is a valid choice, particularly if the patient has overall hyperglycaemia. Despite their comparable glycaemic effects in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), pioglitazone and metformin may have different effects on insulin sensitivity because they have different mechanisms of action. We studied the changes in insulin sensitivity, as assessed by the Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI), in patients with T2DM who used metformin or pioglitazone as monotherapy or in combination therapy with sulphonylurea.
                Data in this report are from two multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies conducted in Europe (monotherapy) or in Europe and Canada (combination therapy study). Patients were randomized to 52 weeks of treatment consisting of a 12-week forced titration period and a 40-week maintenance period. HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting serum insulin (FSI) were quantified from a single blood sample at weeks 0, 8, 16, 24, 32, 42 and 52. Insulin sensitivity was assessed with QUICKI, which is calculated from FSI and fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentrations using the formula 1/(log(10) FSI + log(10) FBG). Time course effects of the treatments were compared by repeated measures analysis of covariance.
                As monotherapy, pioglitazone and metformin increased QUICKI compared with baseline (baseline vs. end point [mean +/- sem]; pioglitazone [0.303 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.321 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001] and metformin [0.304 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.315 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001]). Pioglitazone increased insulin sensitivity more than metformin from week 4 through week 52. There were significant increases in QUICKI from baseline in both combination therapy groups (baseline vs. end point; pioglitazone + sulphonylurea [0.305 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.319 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001] and metformin + sulphonylurea [0.306 +/- 0.001 vs. 0.317 +/- 0.001; P < 0.001]). Overall, pioglitazone + sulphonylurea significantly increased insulin sensitivity more than metformin + sulphonylurea.
                Pioglitazone differed from metformin in its effects on insulin sensitivity despite both drugs having comparable glycaemic effects. To evaluate the ability of vildagliptin and metformin to sustain reductions in HbA(1c) over a 1-year treatment period in drug-naïve patients with Type 2 diabetes (Type 2 DM).
                Double-blind, randomized, multicentre, active-controlled, parallel-group study of 52-week treatment with vildagliptin (100 mg daily, n = 526) or metformin (titrated to 2000 mg daily, n = 254) in drug-naïve patients (baseline HbA(1c) = 7.5-11.0%). HbA(1c) was measured periodically over 1 year.
                Vildagliptin and metformin each rapidly decreased HbA(1c) from an equal baseline of 8.7%. Most of the HbA(1c) reduction was attained by week 12, and the efficacy was sustained throughout 1-year treatment with both agents. At the study end, significant HbA(1c) reductions from baseline were seen with both vildagliptin (-1.0 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.001) and metformin (-1.4 +/- 0.1%, P < 0.001); however, statistical non-inferiority of 50 mg vildagliptin twice daily to 1000 mg metformin twice daily was not established. Body weight did not change during the 1-year treatment with vildagliptin (0.3 +/- 0.2 kg, P = 0.17) and decreased in metformin-treated patients (-1.9 +/- 0.3 kg, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event was 70.1 vs. 75.4% in patients receiving vildagliptin and metformin, respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing a gastrointestinal adverse event was twofold higher in the metformin group, driven by a 3-4-fold greater incidence of diarrhoea, nausea and abdominal pain. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was similarly low in both groups (< 1%).
                A clinically meaningful decrease in HbA(1c) that was sustained throughout a 1-year treatment in drug-naïve patients with Type 2 DM was seen with both metformin and vildagliptin monotherapy. To investigate the effects of extended-release metformin (MXR) compared with immediate-release metformin (MIR) on post-prandial glycaemic excursion, chronic glycaemia, lipid profiles, insulin resistance and islet function in type 2 diabetes.
                A randomised, open-labelled, positive-controlled multicentre study was conducted on 150 Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. After 2 weeks of run-in period with MIR, 150 subjects were randomised into MXR group and MIR group. The patients in MXR group were assigned to take MXR 1500 mg once daily after dinner, while the patients in MIR group were assigned to continue MIR 500 mg thrice daily after meals for 12 weeks. Standard meal tests were carried out at baseline and at the end of this study. Plasma glucose, serum insulin, HbA1c and lipid profiles were measured. Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) was used to evaluate insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) and islet beta-cell function index (HOMA-B).
                Either MIR or MXR modestly, but significantly decreased HbA1c levels and body mass index (BMI) after 12 weeks of treatment. However, there were no significant differences between two groups. The post-prandial glycaemia at 120 min after a standard meal in MXR group was higher than in MIR group (11.02 +/- 3.08 mmol/l vs. 9.74 +/- 2.61 mmol/l, p < 0.05). Moreover, no differences in the areas under curve of insulin release response, HOMA-B, HOMA-IR and lipid profiles were found within or between groups after 12 weeks of treatment.
                The effects of once daily MXR on chronic glycaemia, BMI, lipid profiles, insulin resistance and islet function are comparable with that of thrice daily MIR in oriental population. To evaluate the efficacy of exenatide in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with oral agents.
                Patients taking metformin (MET) alone or with a sulphonylurea (SU) were randomly assigned to exenatide 5 microg then 10 microg twice-daily for 4 and 12 weeks, respectively, or placebo. The primary endpoint was baseline to endpoint HbA(1c) change.
                466 patients (age 54+/-9 years, weight 68.7+/-11.2 kg, BMI 26.3+/-3.3 kg/m(2), and HbA(1c) 8.3+/-1.1%; mean+/-S.D.) were enrolled in the full analysis set. Endpoint HbA(1c) reduction (mean [95% CI]) with exenatide was superior to placebo (-1.2 [-1.3, -1.1]% vs. -0.4 [-0.5, -0.2]%, p<0.001). More exenatide- than placebo-treated patients achieved HbA(1c) <or=7% (48% vs. 17%, p<0.001). At endpoint, weight reduction was greater with exenatide (-1.2 [-1.5, -0.9]kg) than placebo (-0.1 [-0.3, 0.2]kg), p<0.001. Nausea, generally mild-to-moderate, was the most common adverse event with exenatide (25% vs. 1% with placebo). The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia with exenatide and placebo were 36% and 9%, respectively (p<0.001). Hypoglycaemia rates (events/patient-year) for patients taking exenatide with MET or MET and SU were 1.8 (0.9, 3.7) and 4.7 (3.5, 6.5), respectively.
                Exenatide treatment improved glycaemic control in Asian patients with T2D and had a similar safety profile as in non-Asian patients. To investigate the relative role of the adiponectin and leptin in the insulin resistance (IR) and obesity we studied plasma levels of these adipocytokines in obese and insulin resistant postmenopausal (PM) females with type 2 diabetes (DM2) during 6 months of Metformin therapy. We recruited 26 PM women, between the ages of 50 and 67 (59,7+/-8,1 years). These women had a BMI of 36,6+/-1,8 kg/m2. After baseline measurements Metformin therapy has been initiated (1700+/-2550 mg per day). Duration of therapy was 6 months. The results of investigations of adipocytokines after Metformin 6 months therapy shown that circulating adiponectin levels were significantly increased (19,1+/-6,0 vs. 16,1+/-3,9 ng/ml, p=0,008) together with significant reduction of BMI (35,9+/-1,9 vs. 36,6+/-1,8 kg/m2, p=0,005) and IR (3,05+/-0,89 vs. 3,96+/-0,70, p<0,001). The magnitude of the change in adiponectin levels positively correlated with the magnitude of BMI reduction (r=0,4784, p=0,013) and IR reduction (r=0,5779, p=0,002). Any significant correlation did not observed between changes of leptin levels and BMI, leptin levels and IR. In summary, our data suggest that hypoadiponectinemia in PM may be explained by only IR because the amelioration of whole-body insulin action by 6-month Metformin therapy leads to increase of plasma adiponectin levels; leptin levels did not significantly change after 6-month Metformin therapy. To assess the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with sitagliptin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on diet and exercise.
                In a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, 1,091 patients with type 2 diabetes and A1C 7.5-11% were randomized to one of six daily treatments: sitagliptin 100 mg/metformin 1,000 mg (S100/M1000 group), sitagliptin 100 mg/metformin 2,000 mg (S100/M2000 group), metformin 1,000 mg (M1000 group), metformin 2,000 mg (M2000 group) (all as divided doses administered twice daily [b.i.d.]), sitagliptin 100 mg q.d. (S100 group), or placebo. Patients who had an A1C >11% or a fasting glucose value >280 mg/dl after the run-in period were not eligible to be randomized; these patients could participate in an open-label substudy and were treated with S100/M2000 for 24 weeks.
                The mean baseline A1C was 8.8% in the randomized patients. The placebo-subtracted A1C change from baseline was -2.07% (S100/M2000), -1.57% (S100/M1000), -1.30% (M2000), -0.99% (M1000), and -0.83% (S100) (P < 0.001 for comparisons versus placebo and for coadministration versus respective monotherapies). The proportion of patients achieving an A1C <7% and <6.5% was 66 and 44%, respectively, in the S100/M2000 group (P < 0.001 vs. S100 or M2000). For the open-label cohort (n = 117; baseline A1C 11.2%) treated with S100/M2000, the within-group mean A1C change from baseline was -2.9%. The incidence of hypoglycemia was low (0.5-2.2%) across active treatment groups and not significantly different from that in the placebo group (0.6%). The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse experiences was similar for coadministration therapies compared with their respective metformin monotherapy.
                The initial combination of sitagliptin and metformin provided substantial and additive glycemic improvement and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes. nan Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by insulin resistance and defects in insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells, which have been studied by using euglycemic/hyperinsulinemic clamps. However, it is difficult to study insulin resistance and beta-cell failure by these techniques in humans. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of three different antidiabetic therapeutic regimens on insulin resistance and beta-cell activity by using a mathematical model, Homeostasis Model Assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)) and beta-cell function (HOMA(beta-cell)).
                Seventy type 2 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to one of three therapeutic regimens: (A) metformin + American Diabetic Association (ADA)-recommended diet + physical activity; (B) metformin + low-dose glimepiride + ADA diet + physical activity; or (C) ADA diet + physical activity (no drugs). Blood samples were obtained before and after the treatment to determine serum levels of fasting and post-prandial blood glucose, fasting insulin, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) were calculated.
                Fasting and post-prandial levels of glucose, HbA1c, and fasting insulin and calculated HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) values before treatment were significantly higher than the respective values after treatment for all groups of patients (P < 0.01). Significant differences were also found when comparing the treatment-induced reduction in fasting blood glucose (51.8%; P < 0.01), post-prandial blood glucose (55.0%; P < 0.05), and HOMA(IR) (65.3%; P < 0.01) in patients of Group B with that in patients receiving other therapeutic options (Groups A and C).
                Metformin plus low-dose glimepiride (plus ADA diet and physical activity) is a more effective treatment for type 2 diabetes than either metformin plus ADA diet and physical activity or ADA diet and physical activity alone. Determination of HOMA(IR) and HOMA(beta-cell) values is an inexpensive, reliable, less invasive, and less labor-intensive method than other tests to estimate insulin resistance and beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, vildagliptin, and metformin in drug-naïve elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of vildagliptin vs. metformin in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction.
                This was a double-blind, randomized, multicentre, active-controlled, parallel-group study of 24-week treatment with vildagliptin (100 mg daily, n=169) or metformin (titrated to 1500 mg daily, n=166) in drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes aged>or=65 years (baseline HbA1c 7-9%).
                Participants had a mean age of 71 years, known duration of diabetes of 3 years and mean baseline HbA1c of 7.7%. At end-point, vildagliptin was as effective as metformin, improving HbA1c by -0.64+/-0.07% and -0.75+/-0.07%, respectively, meeting the predefined statistical criterion for non-inferiority (upper limit of 95% confidence interval for between-treatment difference<or=0.3%). Body weight changes were -0.45+/-0.20 kg in vildagliptin-treated patients (p=0.02) and -1.25+/-0.19 kg in metformin-treated patients (p<0.001; p=0.004 vs. vildagliptin). The proportion of patients experiencing an adverse event (AE) was 44.3 vs. 50.3% in patients receiving vildagliptin and metformin respectively. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs were significantly more frequent with metformin (24.8%) than with vildagliptin (15.0%, p=0.028), mainly driven by a 4.4-fold higher incidence of diarrhoea. A low incidence of hypoglycaemia was observed in both treatment groups (0% with vildagliptin and 1.2% with metformin).
                Vildagliptin is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, demonstrating similar improvement in glycaemic control as metformin, with superior GI tolerability. Platelet density profiles, intraplatelet nucleotides, intraplatelet beta thromboglobulin (beta TG), plasma beta TG levels, intraplatelet cyclic AMP (cAMP) levels, platelet release reaction, platelet thromboxane (TX)B2 production and plasma fibrinogen levels were investigated in 24 newly diagnosed, non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients and 12 comparable controls. These variables were measured at diagnosis, after a 3-6 week dietary run-in period, and again after 6 months on treatment with either metformin or gliclazide therapy. With dietary restriction of refined carbohydrate and oral hypoglycaemic therapy, there was a reduction in platelet density (p less than 0.05), intraplatelet nucleotides (p less than 0.001), intraplatelet beta TG (p less than 0.001), plasma beta TG (p less than 0.001) and there was an increase in intraplatelet cAMP levels (p less than 0.05). Although these platelet variables returned towards normal, only the platelet density mean returned to within the normal range. There was no significant change in the platelet TXB2 production and plasma fibrinogen levels with treatment. Metformin and gliclazide were equally effective in the glycaemic control of non-insulin-dependent diabetes, and there was no difference between the platelet variables measured in the two groups. We would therefore suggest that improvement of glycaemic control, rather than any specific effect of the oral hypoglycaemic agent employed, is the most important factor in returning these parameters towards normality. Patients with type 2 diabetes are often obese and require large doses of insulin to achieve glycemic control. Weight gain often accompanies insulin therapy and results in increasing insulin requirements.
                To evaluate the efficacy of metformin in combination with insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with insulin therapy alone.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                Outpatient diabetes clinic at a university medical center.
                43 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes who were receiving insulin therapy.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or metformin in combination with insulin for 24 weeks.
                Hemoglobin A1c levels decreased by 2.5 percentage points (95% CI, 1.8 to 3.1 percentage points) in the metformin group, a significantly greater change (P = 0.04) than the decrease of 1.6 percentage points in the placebo group. Average final hemoglobin A1c levels were 6.5% in the metformin group and 7.6% in the placebo group (difference, 11%). For patients who received placebo, the insulin dose increased 22.8 units (CI, 11 to 44 units) or 29% more than did the dose for patients who received metformin (P = 0.002); for these patients, the insulin dose decreased slightly. Patients in the placebo group gained an average of 3.2 kg of body weight (CI, 1.2 to 5.1 kg); patients in the metformin group gained an average of 0.5 kg of body weight (P = 0.07). Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased in both groups. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels did not change.
                The addition of metformin to insulin therapy resulted in hemoglobin A1c concentrations that were 10% lower than those achieved by insulin therapy alone. This improvement in glycemic control occurred with the use of 29% less insulin and without significant weight gain. Metformin is an effective adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study compared glycaemic control achieved with biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) monotherapy, BIAsp 30 plus metformin and glibenclamide plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with metformin.
                In this multinational, open-labelled, parallel group, 16-week trial, 341 patients (patients not adequately controlled with metformin for at least 1 month) with type 2 diabetes were studied. Patients were randomized to receive BIAsp 30, twice daily (n = 107 exposed to treatment), or BIAsp 30, twice daily, plus metformin (n = 108) or glibenclamide plus metformin (n = 114). The primary endpoint was HbA(1c) at end of trial; adverse events, hypoglycaemia episodes, blood lipids and weight were also monitored.
                In the total population (HbA(1c) 7.5-13.0% at screening), end-of-trial HbA(1c) levels were lower in patients receiving BIAsp 30 plus metformin compared with those receiving BIAsp 30 only [mean treatment difference (+/-s.e.m), 0.39 +/- 0.15%, p = 0.007]. In a subpopulation (HbA(1c) > or = 9.0% at baseline, n = 193), patients receiving BIAsp 30 plus metformin had significantly lower HbA(1c) levels at the end of the trial compared with those receiving glibenclamide plus metformin (treatment difference, 0.46 +/- 0.21%, p = 0.027). Mean body weight (+/-s.d) at the end of the trial was significantly lower in patients receiving glibenclamide plus metformin compared with those receiving BIAsp 30 only (84.3 +/- 13.3 kg vs. 88.9 +/- 16.9 kg, p < 0.001). No major hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during the trial, and incidence rates for minor and symptoms-only hypoglycaemia were low and similar between treatment groups (0.03-0.04 events/patient/week).
                BIAsp 30 added to metformin could be an appropriate therapeutic option for achieving good glycaemic control, compared with the addition of a second oral agent, particularly where HbA(1c) > or = 9%. To see if Metformin Monotherapy affects glycemic control, serum lipid or lipoprotein levels in the treatment of type 2 diabetes who were poorly controlled with diet alone or despite maximal doses of (sulfonylurea) oral glucose lowering agents.
                A prospective, clinical intervention trial conducted between 1996-1997.
                Two out patient diabetic clinics of Karachi.
                A 12-week prospective clinical intervention trial. A total of 30 type 2 diabetic subjects were enrolled, of Whom 21 (12 men and 9 women) completed the study period. Their ages ranged between 35 and 70 years, (mean +/- SD 53.3 +/- 9.31) years, with a mean duration since diagnosis of diabetes was 4.5 +/- 2.3 years, body mass index (mean +/- SD) 26.8 +/- 3.53 kg/m2. They were previously treated with diet alone or had already been taking maximum doses of sulfonylurea monotherapy with suboptimal glycemic control, i.e., raised fasting blood glucose concentrations of 6-15 mmol/L or (108-270 mg/dL) on two occasions, with significant hyperglycemic symptoms. The patients were treated with metformin monotherapy with a follow up of 12 weeks. The initial dosage was 500 mg twice daily, and the dosage was increased to two or three tablets depending on the patient's metabolic changes. By comparing before and after 12 weeks therapy with metformin we assessed the importance of baseline parameters (glycemic control, serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations, and measures of change in body weight and body mass index).
                Metformin therapy significantly decreased fasting blood glucose levels in all patients [(mean +/- SD) 227.2 +/- 37.5 to 168.6 +/- 20.5 mg/dl, p < 0.001)]. Serum total cholesterol decreased marginally [(mean +/- SD) 200.3 +/- 18.7 to 181.4 +/- 19.4 mg/dl, p < 0.01)]. Serum total triglycerides concentration also decreased [(mean +/- SD) 195.9 +/- 31.9 to 174.2 +/- 26.6 mg/dl, P < 0.01)]. Low-density lipoproteins declined [(mean +/- SD) 123.5 +/- 16.9 to 105.5 +/- 19.1 mg/dl, P < 0.01)], and very-low density lipoprotein cholesterol also decreased [(mean +/- SD) 39.2 +/- 6.4 to 34.8 +/- to 5.3 mg/dl, P < 0.01)]. Whereas, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol tended to increase [(mean +/- SD) 37.7 +/- 5.1 to 39.5 +/- 4.9 mg/dl, P < 0.01)], while no significant changes occurred in body weight and body mass index.
                Metformin treatment was effective, safe, and generally well tolerated. Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione, improves glycemic control primarily by increasing peripheral insulin sensitivity in patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas metformin, a biguanide, exerts its effect primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output. In the first head-to-head, double-blind clinical trial comparing these two oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs), we studied the effect of 32-wk monotherapy on glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in 205 patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes who were naive to OAM therapy. Subjects were randomized to either 30 mg pioglitazone or 850 mg metformin daily with titrations upward to 45 mg (77% of pioglitazone patients) and 2550 mg (73% of metformin patients), as indicated, to achieve fasting plasma glucose levels of less than 7.0 mmol/liter (126 mg/dl). Pioglitazone was comparable to metformin in improving glycemic control as measured by hemoglobin A1C and fasting plasma glucose. At endpoint, pioglitazone was significantly more effective than metformin in improving indicators of insulin sensitivity, as determined by reduction of fasting serum insulin (P = 0.003) and by analysis of homeostasis model assessment for insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S; P = 0.002). Both OAM therapies were well tolerated. Therefore, pioglitazone and metformin are equally efficacious in regard to glycemic control, but they exert significantly different effects on insulin sensitivity due to differing mechanisms of action. The more pronounced improvement in indicators of insulin sensitivity by pioglitazone, as compared with metformin monotherapy in patients recently diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who are OAM-naive, may be of interest for further clinical evaluation. nan Twelve non-obese non insulin dependent diabetics whose mean +/- SE fasting blood glucose was 12.9 +/- 0.9 mmol/l despite maximal doses of sulphonylureas, received 8 weeks of guar (5 g tid before meals) and 8 weeks of metformin (0.5 g tid) following a six week washout period, in a cross-over design. Guar significantly lowered fasting cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations but did not alter glucose concentrations. Conversely, metformin significantly reduced fasting and post-prandial glucose concentrations but had no influence on plasma lipids. A comparison of the effects of two dose levels of phenformin (50 mg once and twice daily) and metformin (850 mg twice daily and 1,700 mg twice daily) has been undertaken in 24 maturity onset diabetics whose diabetes had remained inadequately controlled with dietary measures alone. Both biguanides effectively reduced the fasting blood sugar and body weight of the patients, metformin apparently having a greater effect on blood sugar than phenformin. Serum triglycerides were lower on the larger dose of metformin than on either dose of phenformin. Both drugs in the larger doses reduced the serum cholesterol. Side effects were more common with metformin, particularly in the higher dosage and overall control of the diabetes was achieved in the same proportion of patients (33%). Impaired exercise capacity, adiponectin, MMPs and TIMPs have all been implicated in the development of cardiovascular disease. The aim of our study was to determine the effects of rosiglitazone on these factors in diabetic patients.
                Seventy individuals with Type 2 diabetes were assigned randomly to either a rosiglitazone group (8 mg/day, RG) or a control group (CG) for 6 months. All participants took gliclazide 160 mg plus metformin 1700 mg in stable dose. None of the individuals had diabetic complications or had previously participated in an exercise programme. Anthropometric parameters, VO2 peak, oxygen pulse, glycaemic indices, lipid profile, adiponectin, insulin resistance, blood pressure and serum MMP-9, TIMP-1, TIMP-2 levels were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. After Bonferroni adjustment, a P-value < 0.017 was assumed to be statistically significant.
                Rosiglitazone treatment significantly increased VO2 peak (P < 0.0001), the duration of the exercise test (P < 0.0001), oxygen pulse (P = 0.010) and TIMP-2 levels (P = 0.008) in comparison with CG. Insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia, diastolic blood pressure and MMP-9 levels were also reduced (P < 0.017). Fat mass, lipid profile, TIMP-1 levels and MMP9 : TIMP-1 ratio were unaltered after rosiglitazone treatment. There were no significant changes in these parameters in control subjects. In univariate analysis, the rosiglitazone-induced increment of VO2 peak was associated with alterations in plasma adiponectin (r = 0.691), HOMA-IR (r = -0.782) and HbA(1c) (r = -0.676) (P < 0.017). These relationships retained significance after multiple regression analysis (P = 0.005).
                Rosiglitazone treatment increases cardiorespiratory fitness and modulates favourably serum adiponectin, MMP-9 and TIMP-2 levels. Whether these effects produce cardiovascular benefits in the long term requires further investigation. This 52-week, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of metformin plus pioglitazone with the established combination of metformin plus gliclazide in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                Patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (HbA1c > or = 7.5% to < or =11.0%) received either pioglitazone 15 mg o.d. (titrated up to 45 mg; n = 317) or gliclazide 80 mg o.d. (titrated up to 320 mg; n = 313) and metformin at the pre-study dose. HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, lipids and the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio were measured.
                There were no significant differences in HbA1c (1% decrease in both groups) and FPG between groups. There was a decrease in fasting insulin in the pioglitazone group compared to an increase in the gliclazide group (p < 0.001). There were significantly greater improvements in triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol in the metformin plus pioglitazone group compared to the metformin plus gliclazide group (p < 0.001). Mean LDL-cholesterol decreased with metformin plus gliclazide and increased with metformin plus pioglitazone (p < 0.001); however, this increase was considerably less marked than that in HDL-cholesterol. The mean urinary albumin/creatinine ratio was reduced by 10% in the metformin plus pioglitazone group compared to an increase of 6% in the metformin plus gliclazide group (p = 0.027). The incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups and both combinations were well tolerated.
                Compared to the established combination of metformin plus gliclazide, this study indicates potential benefits of addition of pioglitazone to metformin in terms of improvements in microalbuminuria and specific abnormalities associated with diabetic dyslipidemia.
                Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of combined hypocaloric diet and metformin on circulating testosterone and leptin levels in obese men with or without type 2 diabetes.
                Twenty obese men with type 2 diabetes (mean body mass index [BMI]: 35.5 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2)) and 20 nondiabetic obese men were enrolled in the study. We measured serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone (LH), total testosterone (TT), free testosterone (FT), sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), and plasma leptin levels before and 3 months after metformin treatment. Both groups were placed on a hypocaloric diet and 850 mg of metformin taken orally twice daily for 3 months.
                Metformin and hypocaloric diets led to decreases in BMI and waist and hip circumferences in both groups. A significant decrease in TT levels in the diabetic group and FT levels in the control group was found, whereas follicle-stimulating hormone, LH, and DHEAS levels were not changed significantly. A significant increase in SHBG levels was observed in the control group but not in the patient group. Leptin levels also decreased after treatment in both groups. Decreased testosterone levels were not correlated to changes in waist and hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, BMI, and levels of fasting blood glucose, leptin, SHBG, or DHEAS in the diabetic group. However, a decrease in FT was correlated to changes in the levels of SHBG (r = -0.71, p = 0.001) and LH (r = 0.80, p = 0.001) but not to other parameters.
                We conclude that metformin treatment combined with a hypocaloric diet leads to reduced FT levels in obese nondiabetic men and to reduced TT levels in obese men with type 2 diabetes. Increased SHBG levels may account for the decrease in FT levels in the former group. In a cross-over study, the effects of 3 months treatment with metformin or glibenclamide on body weight, blood glucose control, and serum lipoproteins were compared in 35 Type 2 diabetic patients, inadequately controlled by dietary therapy alone. Glibenclamide alone increased body weight (mean change +2.75 kg; 95% confidence intervals +1.95 to +3.55 kg; p less than 0.0001). Glibenclamide and metformin achieved equivalent blood glucose control, independent of initial body mass index. Neither drug affected serum triglyceride concentration. Metformin alone significantly reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mean change -0.34 mmol l-1; 95% confidence intervals -0.12 to -0.57 mmol l-1; p less than 0.01). Neither drug altered high density lipoprotein or subfraction cholesterol. Changes in serum lipoproteins were studied in 14 non-insulin dependent diabetics on long-term metformin therapy, after 6 weeks' placebo, and again 6 weeks after restarting active drug therapy. Withdrawal of metformin resulted in a rise of fasting blood glucose, HbA1, serum total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Restarting the drug reversed these changes. Multivariate analysis showed that serum total and LDL cholesterol varied with treatment but not with glycaemic control. Metformin can lower serum total and LDL cholesterol in non-insulin dependent diabetics and this effect is maintained long term. This double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of metformin-glibenclamide tablets vs. metformin plus rosiglitazone therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
                After an open-label, metformin lead-in phase, 318 patients were randomly assigned to treatment based on metformin-glibenclamide 500/2.5 mg tablets (initial daily dose 1000/5 mg) or metformin 500 mg plus rosiglitazone 4 mg (initial daily dose 1000-2000 mg + 4 mg, depending on previous treatment) for 24 weeks. Doses were titrated to achieve the therapeutic glycaemic target. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA1C.
                At week 24, metformin-glibenclamide tablets resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1C (-1.5%) and fasting plasma glucose [-2.6 mmol/l (-46 mg/dl)] than metformin plus rosiglitazone [-1.1%, p < 0.001; -2 mmol/l (-36 mg/dl), p = 0.03]. More patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide attained HbA1C <7.0% than did those in the metformin plus rosiglitazone group (60 vs. 47%) and had fasting plasma glucose levels <7 mmol/l (<126 mg/dl) by week 24 (34 vs. 25%). Both treatments were well tolerated. Frequency of adverse gastrointestinal events was comparable between groups. Four per cent of patients receiving metformin-glibenclamide withdrew because of symptomatic hypoglycaemia contrasted with 3% of patients receiving metformin plus rosiglitazone who withdrew because of persistent hyperglycaemia. Hypoglycaemic events were mild or moderate in intensity and were easily self-managed.
                Metformin-glibenclamide tablets resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose compared with metformin plus rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. Troglitazone and metformin lower glucose levels in diabetic patients without increasing plasma insulin levels. We compared the insulin sparing actions of these two agents and their effects on insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion in 20 type 2 diabetic patients. To avoid the confounding effect of improved glycemic control on insulin action and secretion, patients were first rendered euglycemic with 4 weeks of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) before randomization to CSII plus troglitazone (n = 10) or CSII plus metformin (n = 10); euglycemia was maintained for another 6-7 weeks. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp 1) at baseline, 2) after 4 weeks of CSII, and 3) after CSII plus either troglitazone or metformin. The 24-h glucose, insulin, and C-peptide profiles were performed on the day before the second and third glucose clamps. Good glycemic control was achieved with CSII alone and was maintained with CSII plus an oral agent (mean 24-h glucose: troglitazone, 6.2+/-0.6 mmol/l; metformin, 6.2 +/-0.3 mmol/l). Insulin requirements decreased 53% with troglitazone compared with CSII alone (48+/-4 vs. 102+/-13 U/day, P < 0.001), but only 31% with metformin (76+/-13 vs. 110+/-18 U/day, P < 0.005). The 24-h C-peptide profiles were similar. Normal fasting hepatic glucose output was maintained with both agents despite lower insulin levels than on CSII alone. Insulin sensitivity did not change significantly with CSII alone or with CSII plus metformin, but improved 29% with CSII plus troglitazone (P < 0.005 vs. CSII alone) and was then 45% higher than in the CSII plus metformin patients (P < 0.005). In conclusion, metformin has no effect on insulin-stimulated glucose disposal independent of glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Troglitazone (600 mg/day) has greater insulin-sparing effects than metformin (1,700 mg/day) in CSII-treated euglycemic patients. This is probably explained by the peripheral tissue insulin-sensitizing effects of troglitazone. The study compared the long-term efficacy and safety of miglitol to placebo in Type 2 diabetic outpatients inadequately controlled on combination therapy of diet, glibenclamide and metformin.
                Type 2 diabetic patients (n = 154) receiving glibenclamide 7-20 mg/day and at least one 500-850 mg tablet metformin per day were randomized to receive additional miglitol or placebo for 24 weeks, titrated up stepwise from 25 to 100 mg trice daily.
                Addition of miglitol to sulphonylureas and metformin (per protocol analysis) produced a statistically, significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.55%, P = 0.04) and postprandial glucose (-2.6 mmol/l, P = 0.0009) from baseline to endpoint than placebo (-0.2% and -0.6 mol/l, respectively). Reduction in fasting blood glucose was greater with miglitol than placebo, and there was a possible difference in favor of miglitol for fasting and postprandial triglyceride levels, but these did not reach statistical significance. Flatulence and diarrhea were reported by statistically, significantly more patients receiving miglitol than placebo, but adverse events overall were reported by only 10% more patients in the miglitol group. No cases of hypoglycaemia were reported.
                Miglitol can safely and effectively be added to long-term combination therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with glibenclamide plus metformin. To test the hypothesis that metformin therapy, given as an adjunct to insulin therapy, improves metabolic control in insulin-treated NIDDM patients with suboptimal glycemic control.
                A total of 33 subjects with insulin-treated NIDDM were investigated; all had commenced insulin after secondary failure of antihyperglycemic agents. Two randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover studies were run. In study 1 (n = 19), insulin-treated subjects with suboptimal glycemic control received 12 weeks of metformin 1 g b.i.d. and 12 weeks of placebo. In study 2 (n = 14), subjects already established on adjunctive metformin/insulin therapy stopped the metformin component and received 12 weeks of metformin at their baseline dosage (range 1-2.5 g) and 12 weeks of equivalent placebo. Fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, and serum lipids were measured at baseline and midway through and at the end of each treatment phase. The effect of 12 weeks of metformin treatment was compared with the effect of 12 weeks of placebo in each study and in both studies combined.
                In study 1, metformin treatment was associated with significant improvements in fasting plasma glucose (mean 12-week difference from placebo [95% CI]: 5.8 mmol/l [3.5-8.1], P < 0.001) and HbA1c (1.6% [0.9-2.4], P < 0.001). In study 2, metformin treatment was associated with significantly lower fasting plasma glucose (5.3 mmol/l [0.6-9.9], P = 0.029) and lower HbA1c (2.4% [1.0-3.8], P = 0.003) compared with those for placebo. Study 2 also showed metformin treatment to be associated with significantly lower total cholesterol than that for placebo (1.0 mmol/l [0.1-1.9], P = 0.032) and lower LDL cholesterol (1.0 mmol/l [0.1-1.9], P = 0.028). This significant difference in serum lipids seen in study 2 was not seen in study 1, but was present when both sets of data were combined (n = 33, mean total cholesterol difference at 12 weeks [95% CI]: 0.6 mmol/l [0.1-1.1], P = 0.015). Metformin had no significant effect on triglyceride, HDL cholesterol, weight, or blood pressure. Two subjects on metformin withdrew because of side effects.
                Metformin, when given as adjunctive therapy, was well tolerated and improved glycemic control and lipid concentrations in patients with insulin-treated NIDDM whose diabetes was poorly controlled. These improvements could be maintained over the long term. Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder that results from defects in both insulin secretion and insulin action. Questions remain about when insulin therapy is indicated; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate homeostasis model assessment beta-cell (HOMAbetacell) values as surrogate criteria for insulin therapy indication in patients with type 2 diabetes. A prospective study was performed involving 189 type 2 diabetic patients with deficient metabolic control assessed by clinical and laboratory parameters. All patients received nutritional intervention and combination therapy with metformin and glimepiride. Patients who did not respond were admitted to the next phase, which consisted of glimepiride + metformin + rosiglitazone oral therapy and revaluation after 3 months. Comparisons between responders and nonresponders in this phase were made in order to achieve differences in metabolic parameters and beta cell function. Of 189 patients studied, 150 (79.36%) were considered full responders in the first phase of this study. The remaining 39 patients were admitted in the second trial phase, in which 20 patients (51.28%) responded to triple oral therapy, while the other 19 (49.72%) required insulin therapy. Significant differences were found in fasting and postprandial glycemia (P < 0.001; P < 0.004) between the non-insulin-requiring group (200 +/- 12.0 mg/dL; 266.05 +/- 17,67 mg/dL) and the insulin-requiring group (291.5 +/- 17.6 mg/dL; 361.6 +/- 26.1 mg/dL). Likewise, significant differences were observed in homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance (HOMAIR) and HOMAbetacell values (P < 0.002; P < 0.04) between non-insulin-requiring patients (7.7 +/- 0.8; 24.5 +/- 1.3%) and insulin-requiring patients (12.6 +/- 1.2; 19.4 +/- 2.4%). Finally, significant differences were observed when comparing body mass index (non-insulin-requiring group, 29.2 +/- 0.4 kg/m, versus insulin-requiring group, 27.1 +/- 0.9 kg/m; P < 0.05). HOMAbetacell determination in clinical practice is a useful tool to determine when insulin therapy should be started for type 2 diabetic patients. To determine the efficacy and safety of liraglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) when added to metformin and rosiglitazone in type 2 diabetes.
                This 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial randomized 533 subjects (1:1:1) to once-daily liraglutide (1.2 or 1.8 mg) or liraglutide placebo in combination with metformin (1 g twice daily) and rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily). Subjects had type 2 diabetes, A1C 7-11% (previous oral antidiabetes drug [OAD] monotherapy >or=3 months) or 7-10% (previous OAD combination therapy >or=3 months), and BMI <or=45 kg/m(2).
                Mean A1C values decreased significantly more in the liraglutide groups versus placebo (mean +/- SE -1.5 +/- 0.1% for both 1.2 and 1.8 mg liraglutide and -0.5 +/- 0.1% for placebo). Fasting plasma glucose decreased by 40, 44, and 8 mg/dl for 1.2 and 1.8 mg and placebo, respectively, and 90-min postprandial glucose decreased by 47, 49, and 14 mg/dl, respectively (P < 0.001 for all liraglutide groups vs. placebo). Dose-dependent weight loss occurred with 1.2 and 1.8 mg liraglutide (1.0 +/- 0.3 and 2.0 +/- 0.3 kg, respectively) (P < 0.0001) compared with weight gain with placebo (0.6 +/- 0.3 kg). Systolic blood pressure decreased by 6.7, 5.6, and 1.1 mmHg with 1.2 and 1.8 mg liraglutide and placebo, respectively. Significant increases in C-peptide and homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function and significant decreases in the proinsulin-to-insulin ratio occurred with liraglutide versus placebo. Minor hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with liraglutide, but there was no major hypoglycemia. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with liraglutide, but most occurred early and were transient.
                Liraglutide combined with metformin and a thiazolidinedione is a well-tolerated combination therapy for type 2 diabetes, providing significant improvements in glycemic control. Metformin reduces blood glucose levels predominantly by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, although it also may enhance insulin receptor number or activity. The full effects of metformin are still poorly understood. In this study the effects of metformin on plasma xanthine oxidase (XO) activity, thiobarbituric acid-reactive substance (TBARS), lactate and fructosamine concentration as well as erythrocyte antioxidant enzyme activities were investigated in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. All parameters were measured simultaneously just before metformin therapy (T0), 1 month (T1) and 2 months (T2) later. Results were compared with placebo and control group. We noted significant decrease in XO activity and in TBARS concentration (p<0.001) during monotherapy with metformin vs. placebo and T0 group. A significant correlation was observed between the activity of XO and the concentration of fructosamine (p<0.001). Erythrocyte glutathione peroxidase showed significantly lower activity in T2 group in comparison with T0 group (p<0.01). It is known that diabetic patients produce more TBARS as a result of enhanced free radical generation the source of which may also be the large amounts of XO produced following the conversion of xanthine dehydrogenase in hypoxic diabetic tissues. Thus, our results indirectly suggest that metformin can reduce toxic tissue damage through the inhibition on XO activity. This study was designed to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rosiglitazone (RSG) added to submaximal doses of metformin (MET) with dose escalation to the maximal effective dose of MET monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                In this multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 766 subjects with a baseline MET dose of 1000 mg/day were randomized to receive either RSG 4 mg/day (4 mg/1000 mg) or MET 500 mg/day (1500 mg/day total dose) for 8 weeks. Only the RSG dose was increased in the combination group - to 8 mg/day (8 mg/1000 mg) - and only the MET dose was increased in the MET monotherapy group - to 2000 mg/day for the remaining 16 weeks.
                After 24 weeks, RSG added to MET (8 mg/1000 mg/day) was at least as effective as 2000 mg/day of MET in improving HbA(1c), with mean reductions of -0.93% (95% CI: -1.06%, -0.80%) and -0.71% (95% CI: -0.83%, -0.60%), respectively, from baseline in subjects that completed the study according to the investigator (mean treatment effect/difference of -0.20% [95% CI: -0.36%, -0.04%]). In addition, a higher percentage of subjects in the RSG + MET group achieved American Diabetes Association target levels of HbA(1c) < 7% (58.1% versus 48.4%) and American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists target levels of HbA(1c) <or= 6.5% (40.9% versus 28.2%). This combination provided significantly greater reductions from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG; -2.29 mmol/L [+/- 2.37 mmol/L] and -1.12 mmol/L [+/- 2.41 mmol/L], respectively), with a treatment difference of -0.85 mmol/L (95% Cl: -1.23 mmol/L, -0.47 mmol/L). For the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the percentage of subjects experiencing a gastrointestinal side-effect was 27.9% and 38.7% for the RSG + MET and MET groups, respectively (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.19, 2.24). Mean body weight (+/- SD) increased in all randomized subjects treated with the combination therapy (+ 1.79 +/- 4.15 kg) compared with a mean weight loss in the up-titrated MET group (-1.78 +/- 3.50 kg).
                This study suggests that addition of RSG to submaximal doses of MET may be a suitable alternative to the maximal effective dose of MET monotherapy. Impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) is associated with cardiovascular risk factors, but the effects of pioglitazone and metformin on IGT are not well described. We tested the hypothesis that each drug would exhibit antiatherogenic and anti-inflammatory effects in subjects with IGT and early diabetes. The study design was a prospective, randomized, open label, cross-over study. Blood tests, including a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), were performed at baseline and after each treatment. Pioglitazone 15 mg/day or metformin 500-750 mg/day was given for 3 months. Biochemical markers to assess insulin resistance as well as lipid, inflammatory, neurohumoral, and hemostatic factors were included. Twenty-five subjects (17 male, 8 female; age [mean+/-SD]: 61+/-9 years; 84% hypertensive) completed the protocol. Of 25 subjects, 14 were diagnosed as IGT and 11 as diabetes with 75-g OGTT. Pioglitazone significantly reduced fasting glucose (p<0.05), and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) (p<0.05) and metformin (p<0.01) reduced cholesterol. Both drugs significantly reduced aldosterone (both p<0.05) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) (both p<0.05). Plasma adiponectin was increased only by pioglitazone (p<0.001). Neither drug affected BP levels. In conclusion, pioglitazone was superior to metformin for the improvement of insulin resistance and adiponectin, and both drugs were equally effective in reducing vWF and aldosterone in subjects with IGT and early diabetes. Early intervention with pioglitazone or metformin therapy may reduce the incidence of future cardiovascular disease in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance or early diabetes. To compare the efficacy and safety of glimepiride versus metformin in pediatric subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone or oral monotherapy.
                This 26-week, single-blind, active-controlled, multinational study randomized 285 subjects to receive glimepiride (1-8 mg once daily) or metformin (500-1000 mg twice daily) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was mean change in A1C from baseline to week 24. Safety was assessed by incidence of hypoglycemia and other adverse events.
                Significant reductions from baseline A1C were seen in both the glimepiride (-0.54%, P = 0.001) and metformin (-0.71%, P = 0.0002) groups. A total of 42.4% (56 of 132) and 48.1% (63 of 131) of subjects in the glimepiride and metformin groups, respectively, in the intent-to-treat population achieved A1C <7.0% at week 24. No significant differences were observed between groups in reductions in A1C and self-monitored blood glucose levels, changes in serum lipid concentrations, or hypoglycemia incidence. Significant differences were observed in mean changes from baseline in BMI between groups (0.26 kg/m(2) for glimepiride and -0.33 kg/m(2) for metformin; P = 0.003). The adjusted mean body weight increase was 1.97 kg for glimepiride and 0.55 kg for metformin (P = 0.005). A hypoglycemic episode with blood glucose <50 mg/dl (<2.8 mmol/l) was experienced by 4.9 and 4.2% of glimepiride- and metformin-treated subjects, respectively. A single severe hypoglycemic event occurred in each group.
                Glimepiride reduced A1C similarly to metformin with greater weight gain, and there was comparable safety over 24 weeks in the treatment of pediatric subjects with type 2 diabetes. To investigate the effect of metformin plus roziglitazione (RSGMET) compared with metformin alone (MET) on glycaemic control in well-controlled Type 2 diabetes.
                Subjects (drug naïve or those on glucose-lowering monotherapy) were randomized (n = 526), following a 4-week placebo run-in period, to RSGMET [4 mg rosiglitazone (RSG)/500 mg MET] or MET 500 mg. From weeks 2-18, medication was escalated every 4 weeks (based on gastrointestinal tolerability), then remained at RSGMET 8 mg/2 g or MET 3 g for 14 weeks.
                RSGMET reduced HbA(1c) from 7.2 +/- 0.6 to 6.7 +/- 0.8% at week 32, compared with a reduction from 7.2 +/- 0.6 to 6.8 +/- 0.9% with MET (treatment difference -0.13%; P = 0.0357). More subjects achieved an HbA(1c) value of </= 6.5% at week 32 with RSGMET (51.6 vs. 43.7%), but the treatment difference was not significant (odds ratio 1.37, P = 0.0949). RSGMET produced larger reductions from baseline in mean fasting plasma glucose (adjusted difference -0.62 mmol/l, P < 0.0001), with the odds ratio of achieving a target of < 7.0 mmol/l being 2.33 (P < 0.0001). Statistically significant differences in favour of RSGMET relative to MET were seen for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-derived estimates of insulin sensitivity and pancreatic B-cell function, C-reactive protein (CRP), and systolic blood pressure. Overall rates of gastrointestinal adverse events (relevant to the known profile of MET) were comparable, but with a lower incidence of diarrhoea (8 vs. 18%) with RSGMET. Hypoglycaemia was reported in </= 7% subjects per group.
                RSGMET provided similar short-term glycaemic control to MET with greater improvements in estimates of insulin sensitivity, B-cell function and CRP, with less diarrhoea and low risk of biochemical hypoglycaemia, suggesting that early use of combination therapy may be appropriate. To compare the effect of repaglinide in combination with metformin with monotherapy of each drug on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                A total of 83 patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c > 7.1%) when receiving the antidiabetic agent metformin were enrolled in this multicenter, double-blind trial. Subjects were randomized to continue with their prestudy dose of metformin (n = 27), to continue with their prestudy dose of metformin with the addition of repaglinide (n = 27), or to receive repaglinide alone (n = 29). For patients receiving repaglinide, the optimal dose was determined during a 4- to 8-week titration and continued for a 3-month maintenance period.
                In subjects receiving combined therapy, HbA1c was reduced by 1.4 +/- 0.2%, from 8.3 to 6.9% (P = 0.0016) and fasting plasma glucose by 2.2 mmol/l (P = 0.0003). No significant changes were observed in subjects treated with either repaglinide or metformin monotherapy in HbA1c (0.4 and 0.3% decrease, respectively) or fasting plasma glucose (0.5 mmol/l increase and 0.3 mmol/l decrease respectively). Subjects receiving repaglinide either alone or in combination with metformin, had an increase in fasting levels of insulin between baseline and the end of the trial of 4.04 +/- 1.56 and 4.23 +/- 1.50 mU/l, respectively (P < 0.02). Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in the metformin group. An increase in body weight occurred in the repaglinide and combined therapy groups (2.4 +/- 0.5 and 3.0 +/- 0.5 kg, respectively; P < 0.05).
                Combined metformin and repaglinide therapy resulted in superior glycemic control compared with repaglinide or metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes whose glycemia had not been well controlled on metformin alone. Repaglinide monotherapy was as effective as metformin monotherapy. nan To assess and compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of metformin (M) and sulfonylurea (glyburide, G), alone and in various combinations, in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM).
                Of 165 patients (fasting blood glucose [FBG] > or = 6.7 mmol/l) initially treated with diet alone, 144 (FBG still > or = 6.7 mmol/l) were randomized to double-blind, double-dummy controlled treatment with M, G, or primary combination therapy (MG). The dose was titrated, with FBG < 6.7 mmol/l as target, using, at most, six dose levels. The first three dose levels comprised increasing single-drug therapy (M or G) or primary combination at increasing but low dosage (MGL), and the second three levels were composed of various high-dose combinations, i.e., add-on therapy (M/G or G/M) and primary combination escalated to high dosage (MGH). Medication was maintained for 6 months after completed dose titration.
                The FBG target was achieved in 9% of patients after diet alone. Single-drug therapy was insufficient in 36% and MGL in 25% (NS) of the randomized patients. There was further improvement in glucose control by the high-dose combinations. Mean FBG +/- SE was reduced (P = 0.001) from 9.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.0 +/- 0.2 mmol/l in those maintained on single-drug treatment or low-dose primary combination. Those treated with different high-dose combinations had a large mean FBG reduction, from 13.3 +/- 0.8 to 7.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l. HbA1c levels showed corresponding reductions, and glycemic levels rose after drug discontinuation. Fasting C-peptide rose during treatment with G and MGL but not with M, while fasting insulin was not significantly changed. Meal-stimulated C-peptide and insulin levels were unchanged by M but increased by G and, to a lesser extent, by MGL. There were no significant insulin or C-peptide differences between the different high-dose combinations (M/G, G/M, and MGH). Body weight did not change following treatment with M or combination but increased by 2.8 +/- 0.7 kg following G alone. Blood pressure was unchanged. Overall effects on plasma lipids were small, with no significant differences between groups. Drug safety was satisfactory, even if the reporting of (usually modest) adverse events was high; the profile, but not the frequency, differed between groups.
                Dose-effect titrated treatment with either metformin or glyburide promotes equal degrees of glycemic control. The former, but not the latter, is able to achieve this control without increasing body weight or hyperinsulinemia. Near-normal glycemia can be obtained by a combination of metformin and sulfonylurea, even in advanced NIDDM. To compare the chronic hyperlactatemic effect of phenformin and metformin, we performed a double-blind study in 10 non insulin-dependent diabetics without any other known hyperlactatemic condition. After a pre-study period, each patient was allocated to a 6-month treatment with phenformin (50 mg bid) or metformin (850 mg bid) in random sequence. Body weight values were not significantly different between phenformin and metformin. Diabetic control was significantly (p less than 0.001) improved by both biguanides versus pre-study, but was the same during metformin and phenformin: HbAI = 13.8 +/- 0.3 SEM% during pre-study 9.7 +/- 0.2% during phenformin, 10.2 +/- 0.2% during metformin. Mean values of plasma lactate during metformin were significantly lower versus phenformin (1.30 +/- 0.05 vs 1.64 +/- 0.05 mmol/l, p less than 0.001). Mean values of plasma lactate/pyruvate ratio during metformin were significantly lower versus phenformin (16.92 +/- 0.59 vs 22.65 +/- 0.87, p less than 0.001), but not versus pre-study (16.19 +/- 0.51). These results indicate that: 1) during a 6-month treatment with a diabetic control of similar degree phenformin produces a significantly higher hyperlactatemic effect vs metformin; 2) metformin treatment is associated with less impairment of intracellular redox state versus phenformin, and therefore should be considered advantageous in the long-term treatment of non insulin-dependent diabetics. Metformin efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes has not been studied in the elderly patient under conditions pertaining to clinical practice. We have therefore, studied prospectively over two months 24 patients aged between 70-88 years with 115% mean ideal body wt and glycemic control greater than 10 mol.l-1 fasting and/or greater than 14 mol.l-1 postprandial, and/or an HbA1 value greater than 10%. At entry into the study, patients were on metformin + sulfonylurea (n = 15), sulfonylurea (n = 3), metformin (n = 2), insulin (n = 1) or diet alone (n = 3). They received metformin as the sole therapy when possible (sulfonylureas were discontinued in 9 cases) at a dosage of either 850 mg or 1,700 mg/day dependent on creatinine clearance values of 30-60 ml.min-1 (n = 11) and greater than 60 ml.min-1 (n = 13), respectively. Compared to pretreatment values, glycemic control at 1 and 2 months were unchanged, with metformin blood levels remaining within expected values for both dosage groups. Blood lactate levels remained unchanged in the high dosage group but were reduced (p less than 0.05) on 850 mg/day probably because of the reduction of metformin dosage in patients already treated prior to the study. It is concluded that provided the dosage is adjusted to renal function, the metabolic tolerance of metformin therapy is satisfactory in the elderly type 2 diabetic patient. With regard to efficacy, longer observations are needed to know whether this therapy may offer on a long-term basis equivalent glycemic control compared to other treatment modalities. Type 2 diabetes is characterised by a progressive decline in HbA1c control over time. Early combination therapy, rather than sequential introduction of individual oral glucose-lowering agents, has been proposed to prevent this gradual rise in HbA1c. This observational study assessed the effect of early dual combination oral glucose-lowering therapies within 6 months of diagnosis in newly diagnosed, drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients and methods: This was an observational, open-label, non-randomised study in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes, aged 35-70 years, with HbA1c levels > 8.0% at diagnosis or > 7.0% at the 3-6-month follow-up. Patients were allocated to dietary management alone if the HbA1c level was 7.0-8.0% at diagnosis. Metformin combined with gliclazide, repaglinide, or pioglitazone was given at diagnosis if the HbA1c was > 8.0%. Similar treatments were introduced at 3-6 months if the HbA1c was > 7.0%. Over a 3-year period, HbA1c was measured at 3-monthly intervals. All patients underwent regular dietetic review. Target HbA1c was < or = 7.0%.
                416 patients were considered eligible for inclusion, with a mean (+/- SD) age of 54.1 +/- 9.2 years, BMI of 33.5 +/- 6.1 kg/m2, and baseline HbA1c of 8.6 +/- 1.7%. A mixed model analysis of variance on the 178 patients who started with combination therapy, either immediately or after a 3-6 month period on diet, showed that metformin plus gliclazide, repaglinide, or pioglitazone was associated with a gradual increase in HbA1c values. Amongst those patients treated with the metformin/pioglitazone combination there was an estimated 0.1% increase in HbA1c/year. This was much less pronounced than the rises seen in HbA1c/year of 0.5% with the metformin/gliclazide and metformin/repaglinide combinations.
                This preliminary analysis of an observational, non-randomised, open-label ongoing study has shown that early use of combination therapy at time of diagnosis or within the first 3-6 months following diagnosis with metformin plus pioglitazone in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes results in a slower deterioration in glycaemic control than that with metformin combined with either gliclazide or repaglinide. This may be due to the beta-cell protective properties of pioglitazone. These results need to be confirmed by further studies with a more robust design and methodology. Their complimentary mechanisms of action suggest that a combination of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin may have clinically beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.
                This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
                This was a 16-week, double-blind study with the option of enrollment in a separate open-ended, open-label study. It included patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] > or =8.0%, fasting C-peptide >1.0 ng/mL) who had been receiving a stable regimen of metformin for > or =30 days. Patients with diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy; impaired liver or kidney function; or unstable cardiovascular or cerebrovascular conditions were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily pioglitazone 30 mg + metformin or placebo + metformin. Patients in the open-label extension received pioglitazone 30 mg (with optional titration to 45 mg) + metformin.
                Three hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized to treatment (168 pioglitazone + metformin, 160 placebo + metformin), and 249 completed the study. Of these, 154 elected to enter the open-label extension study. Patients' mean age was 56 years; most (84%) were white and slightly more than half (57%) were male. Patients receiving piogli- tazone 30 mg + metformin had statistically significant mean decreases in HbA1c (-0.83%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (-37.7 mg/dL) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Decreases in FPG levels occurred as early as the fourth week of therapy, the first time point at which FPG was measured. The pioglitazone + metformin group had significant mean percentage changes in levels of triglycerides (-18.2%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+8.7%) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Mean percentage increases were noted in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (7.7%, pioglitazone + metformin; 11.9%, placebo + metformin) and total cholesterol (4.1%, pioglitazone + metformin; 1.1%, placebo + metformin), with no significant differences between groups. In the extension study, patients treated with open-label pioglitazone + metformin for 72 weeks had mean changes from baseline of -1.36% in HbA1c and -63.0 mg/dL in FPG. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Throughout the study, no patient in either treatment group had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value > or =3 times the upper limit of normal, a commonly used marker of potential liver damage. Thus, no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity or drug-induced elevations in serum ALT was observed.
                In this study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone + metformin significantly improved HbA1c and FPG levels, with positive effects on serum lipid levels and no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. These effects were maintained for >1.5 years, including the open-label extension. Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, triglyceride and apolipoproteins A-I and B were studied at diagnosis and after 12 months conventional treatment in a group of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. No significant deleterious effect on serum lipids and apolipoproteins was seen in any of the subgroups during the treatment period, although in the overall group there was a significant increase in serum total cholesterol in females. Serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol increased significantly in obese males treated with calorie restriction alone. There was a significant increase in serum apolipoprotein A-I in obese females treated with calorie restriction and metformin and in non-obese females treated with carbohydrate restriction and glibenclamide. The thiazolidinediones are a new class of antidiabetes medication that enhances the actions of insulin in muscle, liver, and adipose tissue. Data have been lacking on their use in combination with both sulfonylurea and metformin among patients for whom insulin is the usual therapeutic alternative for improved glycemic control.
                To determine the effects of troglitazone on hemoglobin A(1c) level in patients treated with maximum tolerated doses of sulfonylurea and metformin who have hemoglobin A(1c) levels of at least 0.085 (8.5%). This trial was completed before troglitazone was taken off the U.S. market.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, followed by an open-label extension during which all patients received troglitazone.
                16 outpatient clinics in Canada.
                200 patients (mean age, 59 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hemoglobin A(1c) levels at least 0.085 (8.5%) (mean hemoglobin A(1c) level, 0.097 [9.7%] and mean fasting plasma glucose level, 12.9 mmol/L [233 mg/dL]) while receiving maximum doses of sulfonylurea and metformin.
                Levels of hemoglobin A(1c), fasting plasma glucose, total insulin, triglycerides, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
                Troglitazone, 400 mg/d, when added to sulfonylurea and metformin, significantly decreased hemoglobin A(1c) level by 0.014 +/- 0.002 (95% CI, 0.0167 to 0.0109; P < 0.001) (1.4% +/- 0.2% [CI, 1.67% to 1.09%]) and insulin by 19 +/- 4 pmol/L (CI, 30 to 10 pmol/L; P < 0.001). At 6 months, 43% of troglitazone-treated patients achieved hemoglobin A(1c) levels of 0.08 (8%) or lower compared with 6% of placebo recipients. Efficacy was maintained at 12 months.
                The thiazolidinedione troglitazone, at a dosage of 400 mg/d, is effective when used in combination with sulfonylurea and metformin. Thiazolidinediones may therefore offer an effective alternative to insulin for patients treated with sulfonylurea and metformin who do not achieve adequate glycemic control. To study the dose response to metformin in type II diabetic patients.
                Type II diabetic patients with a BMI > 25 were treated with 3,000 mg/day (n = 27), 1,500 mg/day (n = 25), or placebo (n = 23) for 6 months. Venous blood samples were taken at each visit for plasma glucose and insulin, HbA1c, triglyceride and cholesterol, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) antigen and activity, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and euglobulin clot lysis time (ECLT). Blood pressure was recorded at each visit.
                There were no changes in BMI or blood pressure. Blood glucose fell (mean) by 3.6 mmol/l in the high-dose and 0.5 mmol/l in the low-dose group over the 6-month study (P < 0.001 and NS compared with placebo). HbA1c and plasma insulin fell in both treatment groups (HbA1c, P < 0.001; insulin, P < 0.003 and 0.03). There was a fall in triglyceride (P < 0.05) and cholesterol (P < 0.008) with high-dose metformin. PAI-1 antigen and activity fell by approximately 20% of baseline in both treatment groups (PAI-1 antigen high dose, P < 0.01; PAI-1 antigen low dose, P < 0.002: PAI-1 activity high and low dose, P < 0.003). There were significant falls in total tPA in both groups (P < 0.004), but the overall effect was a fall in ECLT (P < 0.03).
                The results indicate that metformin has favorable effects on cardiovascular risk factors associated with type II diabetes. The effects on glycemic control and lipids are dose-dependent, while the enhanced fibrinolytic response is independent of the doses used. In a multicentre trial in general practice, a total of 1823 type 2 diabetics, not adequately controlled by diet and maximal sulphonylurea therapy, were treated with additional metformin 850--2 550 mg/d for 12 weeks. The average postprandial blood sugar decreased from 15.48 mmol/l to 10.43 mmol/l, HbA1 fell from 11.0% to 9.1%. Serum triglycerides decreased from an initial level of 2.87 mmol/l to 2.41 mmol/l an mean total cholesterol from 6.76 mmol/l to 6.16 mmol/l. In addition, body weight and blood pressure declined steadily. All the described changes were statistically significant. The metformin-sulphonylurea combination therapy was generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects occurred in about 7% of patients, but mainly in the first week of treatment, generally disappearing spontaneous as therapy was continued. Side effects led to a discontinuation of the treatment in 4.2% of patients. To compare the overall efficacy of combination therapies focused on fasting or postprandial blood glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes not adequately controlled with oral sulfonylurea agents alone.
                A total of 135 patients were randomly assigned for 3 months to 1 of 3 combination regimens with glyburide (G) that addressed postprandial blood glucose with insulin lispro (L+G), premeal blood glucose with metformin (M+G), or fasting blood glucose (FBG) with bedtime NPH insulin (NPH+G).
                At end point, HbA1c was significantly lower with all therapies (P = 0.001) and was significantly lower for L+G (7.68+/-0.88%) compared with either NPH+G (8.51+/-1.38%, P = 0.003) or M+G (8.31+/-1.31%, P = 0.025). FBG at end point was significantly lower for NPH+G (8.49+/-2.36 mmol/l) compared with either L+G (10.57+/-1.97 mmol/l, P = 0.001) or M+G (9.69+/-2.89 mmol/l, P = 0.029). The mean 2-h postprandial glucose after a test meal was significantly lower for L+G (10.87+/-2.88 mmol/l) versus NPH+G (12.21+/-3.12 mmol/, P = 0.052) or versus M+G (12.72+/-3.26 mmol/l, P = 0.009). The overall rate of hypoglycemia (episodes per 30 days) was low and not statistically significant between groups (P = 0.156).
                Adding a second antihyperglycemic agent, regardless of its timing of action, lowers HbA1c and glucose values. However, when insulin lispro was used to focus on postprandial blood glucose, there was a greater impact on overall metabolic control. These data support the importance of lowering postprandial blood glucose to optimize overall glycemic control and thus improve long-term outcomes. nan nan This study was undertaken to assess the effects of combined treatment with insulin and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in whom dietary measures, weight control, and oral antihyperglycemic therapy had failed.
                Insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, increased hepatic gluconeogenesis, and impaired insulin secretion are the underlying factors in the development of type 2 diabetes. Metformin is a biguanide antihyperglycemic agent that increases peripheral insulin sensitivity, reduces hepatic gluconeogenesis, and decreases intestinal glucose absorption.
                Thirty-one patients (24 women, 7 men; mean age, 61.8 years; mean body mass index [BMI], 28.0 kg/m2) were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, 2-way, crossover, placebo-controlled study. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were treated previously with insulin or oral hypoglycemic agents and who had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level >9% or a fasting blood glucose level >8 mmol/L were included. Patients who were being treated with oral agents were switched to insulin therapy and required to maintain stable blood glucose control for 2 months prior to randomization. Patients received insulin plus either metformin 1,700 mg/d or placebo for 5 months, followed by a 2-month washout period, and were then crossed over to the other treatment arm for 5 months of additional treatment (total treatment period: 12 months).
                Thirty patients completed the study; 1 patient withdrew early because of hypoglycemia. Compared with placebo, metformin produced significant reductions from overall baseline in mean daily insulin dose requirement (-8.69 units (17.2%], P < 0.001), HbA1c level (-0.74 [9.9%], P = 0.005), serum fructosamine level (-44.40 micromol/L, P = 0.026), 24-hour blood glucose profile (P = 0.008), and total cholesterol level (-0.42 mmol/L, P = 0.005). No treatment effects were observed on body weight, blood pressure, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, or serum triglyceride levels. There was no correlation between BMI and reduction in HbA1C. No major side effects were reported.
                Combination therapy with metformin and insulin improves glycemic control and reduces insulin requirements. with no major side effects, in patients with type 2 diabetes and may improve the risk profile in this patient population. To determine the degree to which alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, with their unique mode of action primarily reducing postprandial hyperglycemia, offer an additional therapeutic approach in the long-term treatment of type 2 diabetes.
                We studied 1,946 patients (63% men) who were previously enrolled in the U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS). The patients were randomized to acarbose (n = 973), titrating to a maximum dose of 100 mg three times per day, or to matching placebo (n = 973). Mean +/- SD age was 59 +/- 9 years, body weight 84 +/- 17 kg, diabetes duration 7.6 +/- 2.9 years, median (interquartile range) HbA1c 7.9% (6.7-9.5), and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 8.7 mmol/l (6.8-11.1). Fourteen percent of patients were treated with diet alone, 52% with monotherapy, and 34% with combined therapy. Patients were monitored in UKPDS clinics every 4 months for 3 years. The main outcome measures were HbA1c, FPG, body weight, compliance with study medication, incidence of side effects, and frequency of major clinical events.
                At 3 years, a lower proportion of patients were taking acarbose compared with placebo (39 vs. 58%, P < 0.0001), the main reasons for noncompliance being flatulence (30 vs. 12%, P < 0.0001) and diarrhea (16 vs. 8%, P < 0.05). Analysis by intention to treat showed that patients allocated to acarbose, compared with placebo, had 0.2% significantly lower median HbA1c at 3 years (P < 0.001). In patients remaining on their allocated therapy, the HbA1c difference at 3 years (309 acarbose, 470 placebo) was 0.5% lower median HbA1c (8.1 vs. 8.6%, P < 0.0001). Acarbose appeared to be equally efficacious when given in addition to diet alone; in addition to monotherapy with a sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin; or in combination with more complex treatment regimens. No significant differences were seen in FPG, body weight, incidence of hypoglycemia, or frequency of major clinical events.
                Acarbose significantly improved glycemic control over 3 years in patients with established type 2 diabetes, irrespective of concomitant therapy for diabetes. Careful titration of acarbose is needed in view of the increased noncompliance rate seen secondary to the known side effects. Epidemiological studies have implicated increased plasminogen-activated inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) as a marker or predictor of accelerated coronary atherosclerotic disease in type 2 diabetes. We sought to determine whether metabolic control, independent of its oral mode of implementation, affects PAI-1 in patients with marked hyperglycemia.
                A total of 91 subjects were screened, subjected to a 4-week drug washout, and randomized to daily treatment with glipizide GITS (maximum 20 mg, n = 46) or metformin (maximum 2,550 mg, n = 45) as monotherapy. After monotherapy, combination therapy was initiated by adding the second agent to the regimen. Plasma glucose (fasting and postprandial), HbA(1c), fructosamine, and PAI-1 were assayed before and after randomization and sequentially thereafter in all subjects; hepatic glucose output (HGO) and abdominal fat distribution were each measured in a subset of subjects.
                Glycemic control was markedly impaired at baseline (mean HbA(1c) 10.4 +/- 0.2% glipizide GITS; 10.0 +/- 0.2% metformin) but improved comparably with each agent as monotherapy and in combination (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline), as assessed with meal tolerance studies, fructosamine values, and HGO. Body weight and abdominal fat distribution did not change significantly in either group. PAI-1 concentrations were extraordinarily high (5- to 10-fold more than normal) at baseline (202 +/- 12 ng/ml glipizide GITS; 201 +/- 13 ng/ml metformin) but declined comparably, and significantly, after treatment with either agent as monotherapy and decreased further with combination therapy.
                When hyperglycemia is profound, increases in PAI-1 are also profound. Control of hyperglycemia with either glipizide GITS, an insulin secretagogue, or metformin as monotherapy comparably ameliorates elevated PAI-1. The effects of alpha-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) were studied in 36 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), aged 34-67 years with a mean duration of diabetes of 8.8 +/- 0.9 years. They were poorly controlled with diet plus sulfonylurea alone or plus sulfonylurea combined with metformin drugs. Acarbose, 100 mg three times daily, was additionally given to these patients for six months. Results showed small but significant decreases (P < 0.001) in postprandial blood glucose level. Glycosylated hemoglobin level was lowered significantly (P < 0.001) and was normalised (level of < 8%) in 17 per cent of the patients. Fasting serum triglycerides level decreased significantly (P < 0.01), whereas, no significant changes in serum total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol levels were seen. Body weight also decreased significantly (P < 0.001) at the end of acarbose trial. Flatulence was the major side effect of acarbose found in 42 per cent of the patients but it was well-tolerated and may be transient and self-limited. We concluded that the addition of acarbose to the therapeutic regimens of diet therapy plus sulfonylurea or plus sulfonylurea combined with metformin drugs led to significant improvement of glycemic control. Acarbose may be a safe and valuable adjunct to diet and sulfonylurea and metformin treatments in obese, poorly-controlled patients with NIDDM. To compare the metabolic effects of pioglitazone, metformin, and glimepiride in the treatment of Japanese patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes.
                A total of 114 patients with Type 2 diabetes who had never used oral hypoglycaemic drugs were studied for 12 months. Patients were randomly assigned to pioglitazone (30-45 mg/day, n = 38), metformin (750 mg/day, n = 39), or glimepiride (1.0-2.0 mg/day, n = 37). The effect of treatment on fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5AG), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids (FFA), and fasting plasma insulin levels was monitored monthly. Body weight and safety data were also collected.
                Eight patients withdrew from the study (three in the pioglitazone group, two in the metformin group, and three in the glimepiride group). The rate of reduction of HbA(1c) was fastest in patients receiving glimepiride and slowest in patients receiving pioglitazone. Although there were no significant differences among the three groups in HbA(1c) levels at the end of the study, patients taking pioglitazone had relatively lower FPG and 1,5AG levels than patients taking the other two drugs. These results suggest that pioglitazone acts predominantly on nocturnal metabolism rather than at mealtimes. FFA were reduced significantly in those taking pioglitazone (542.2 microEq/l vs. 237.3 microEq/l; P < 0.01) before a decrease in HbA(1c) was apparent. The change in FFA levels correlated with the change in HbA(1c) (r = 0.409, P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in other lipid parameters among the groups.
                Pioglitazone, metformin, and glimepiride are equally effective in reducing blood glucose in patients with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes. However, their specific characteristics, such as the rapid action on blood glucose levels of glimepiride and the favourable action on FPG and FFA of pioglitazone, should be considered when choosing an appropriate agent. To compare the metabolic and hemodynamic effects of metformin and glibenclamide in normotensive NIDDM patients.
                After a 2-wk run-in period on dietary treatment alone, 12 Chinese normotensive patients with uncomplicated NIDDM were randomized to receive either metformin, or glibenclamide for 4 wk before being crossed-over to the alternative treatment for an additional 4 wk. Metabolic and hemodynamic index, including cardiac output estimation by impedance cardiography, were measured at baseline and at the end of each treatment period.
                Body mass index was reduced more with metformin than with glibenclamide, although glycemic control was similar with both drugs. Plasma total cholesterol concentration fell more with metformin (mean difference -0.65 mM, 95% confidence interval -0.96 to -0.32) than glibenclamide (mean difference -0.20 mM, 95% confidence interval -0.54-0.12) (P < 0.05). Compared with baseline values, erect diastolic blood pressure was reduced more by metformin (12.9% [95% confidence interval -21.5 to -4.4%]) than glibenclamide (-6.8% [95% confidence interval -14.9 to 1.2%]) (P < 0.001). The relative changes in the systemic vascular resistance index also differed between the two treatments (glibenclamide, 6.2 [-4.3 to 16.6%]; metformin, -1.2 [95% confidence interval -8.8-6.4%]) (P < 0.05)].
                In normotensive NIDDM patients, treatment with metformin was associated with greater reductions in body weight, plasma total cholesterol concentration, and erect diastolic blood pressure, whereas the systemic vascular resistance index increased after treatment with glibenclamide. These findings merit long-term investigation. Type 2 diabetic subjects failing glyburide therapy were randomized to receive additional therapy with either metformin (2,550 mg/day) or troglitazone (600 mg/day) for 3-4 months. Biopsies of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue were obtained before and after therapy. Glycemic control was similar with both treatments. Metformin treatment increased insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal rates by 20% (P < 0.05); the response to troglitazone was greater (44% increase, P < 0.01 vs. baseline, P < 0.05 vs. metformin). Troglitazone-treated subjects displayed a tendency toward weight gain (5 +/- 2 kg, P < 0.05), increased adipocyte size, and increased serum leptin levels. Metformin-treated subjects were weight-stable, with unchanged leptin levels and reduced adipocyte size (to 84 +/- 4% of control, P < 0.005). Glucose transport in isolated adipocytes from metformin-treated subjects was unaltered from pretreatment. Glucose transport in both the absence (321 +/- 134% of pre-Rx, P < 0.05) and presence of insulin (418 +/- 161%, P < 0.05) was elevated after troglitazone treatment. Metformin treatment had no effect on adipocyte content of GLUT1 or GLUT4 proteins. After troglitazone treatment, GLUT4 protein expression was increased twofold (202 +/- 42%, P < 0.05). Insulin-stimulated serine phosphorylation of Akt was augmented after troglitazone (170 +/- 34% of pre-Rx response, P < 0.05) treatment and unchanged by metformin. We conclude that the ability of troglitazone to upregulate adipocyte glucose transport, GLUT4 expression, and insulin signaling can contribute to its greater effect on whole-body glucose disposal. We investigated whether or not "low dose" metformin could prevent weight gain induced by pioglitazone.
                Sixty-nine patients with type 2 diabetes received 500-750 mg metformin a day for 12 weeks as an observation period before the start of the intervention. After an observation period, inadequately controlled patients (hemoglobin A1c >or=7.5%, n=34) received additional treatment with 15 mg pioglitazone (+P, M+P group). The other patients (n= 35) continued metformin monotherapy (Met group). In addition, another group consisting of 28 patients treated with 15 mg pioglitazone alone (Pio group) was observed. Body mass index (BMI), as well as several clinical parameters of glycemic control and lipid metabolism, was compared before and after 24 weeks of intervention.
                BMI increased significantly in the Pio group [24.0+/-3.8 vs. 24.8+/-4.3 kg/m(2), (mean +/- SD), p<0.001], but not in the M+P group (25.1+/-3.5 vs. 25.3+/-3.4 kg/m(2), NS) and Met group (24.0+/-3.3 vs. 24.0+/-3.5 kg/m(2), NS). In addition to improvement in glycemic control, a significant reduction in the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), defined as log [TG x0.0112/HDL-C x0.02586], was observed in the Pio group (0.06+/-0.23 vs. -0.04+/-0.27, p<0.05) and M+P group (0.08+/-0.24 vs. -0.001+/-0.252, p<0.01), but not in the Met group.
                This study indicates potential benefits of the addition of pioglitazone to "low dose" metformin in terms of improvement of glucose and lipid metabolism without weight gain. Dapagliflozin, a novel inhibitor of renal sodium-glucose cotransporter 2, allows an insulin-independent approach to improve type 2 diabetes hyperglycemia. In this multiple-dose study we evaluated the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in type 2 diabetic patients.
                Type 2 diabetic patients were randomly assigned to one of five dapagliflozin doses, metformin XR, or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary objective was to compare mean change from baseline in A1C. Other objectives included comparison of changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), weight, adverse events, and laboratory measurements.
                After 12 weeks, dapagliflozin induced moderate glucosuria (52-85 g urinary glucose/day) and demonstrated significant glycemic improvements versus placebo (DeltaA1C -0.55 to -0.90% and DeltaFPG -16 to -31 mg/dl). Weight loss change versus placebo was -1.3 to -2.0 kg. There was no change in renal function. Serum uric acid decreased, serum magnesium increased, serum phosphate increased at higher doses, and dose-related 24-h urine volume and hematocrit increased, all of small magnitude. Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar across all groups.
                Dapagliflozin improved hyperglycemia and facilitates weight loss in type 2 diabetic patients by inducing controlled glucosuria with urinary loss of approximately 200-300 kcal/day. Dapagliflozin treatment demonstrated no persistent, clinically significant osmolarity, volume, or renal status changes. In the present study we assessed and compared the effectiveness and safety of preconstituted, fixed, combinations of low-dose glyburide plus metformin with higher-dose glyburide monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. This randomized, double-blind, cross-over study comprised 40 patients. After a 30-day run-in period of dietary treatment, patients received combined glyburide (5, 7.5 or 10 mg/day) and metformin (800, 1,200 or 1,600 mg/day) as preconstitued, fixed combinations, or glyburide alone (5, 10 or 15 mg/day). The dose was increased stepwise so as to have 1 (T1), 2 (T2) and 3 (T3) months of treatment for any given regimen (6 months in total). After 2 weeks of washout (T4), the groups were then crossed over (T5, T6, T7 periods). Body weight, fasting plasma glucose, HbA(1c), blood lactate, total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured at the beginning and end of T1 and T5, and end of T2, T3, T6 and T7; postprandial plasma glucose, fasting and postprandial plasma insulin and C-peptide were evaluated at the beginning of T1 and T5, and end of T3 and T7. At these latter time points additional assessments included routine clinical chemistry measurements, ECG, and ophthalmoscopic examination. Statistical analysis was performed by the paired Student's t-test and analysis of variance for cross-over studies. Thirty-three patients completed the study. Fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose and HbA(1c) levels improved significantly during combined treatment with glyburide at lower doses plus metformin. This effect was achieved without any major change of insulin and C-peptide concentrations. Circulating lactate concentrations increased during the regimen including metformin, but they remained well within the reference values for normal subjects. Plasma total cholesterol and triglycerides levels remained substantielly unchanged throughout the study, whereas HDL-cholesterol concentrations increased slightly, but significantly, with glyburide plus metformin therapy. Routine clinical chemistry measurements, ECG and ophthalmoscopic examinations did not change during the study. These results demonstrate that improved metabolic control can be achieved with preconstituted, fixed combinations of low-dose glyburide plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes, compared to higher doses of the sulphonylurea alone. nan nan To study the efficacy and safety of various dosages of metformin as compared with placebo in patients with type II diabetes mellitus.
                A 14-week, multicenter, double-blind, dose-response study was conducted. After a 3-week, single-blind, placebo-controlled washout, 451 patients with fasting plasma glucose levels of at least 180 mg/dL were randomized to receive an 11-week course of placebo or metformin given at 500, 1000, 1500, 2000, or 2500 mg daily.
                Metformin improved glucose variables as compared with placebo. The adjusted mean changes in fasting plasma glucose from baseline associated with each metformin group at week 7, 11, or at endpoint exceeded those associated with placebo by 19 to 84 mg/dL at dosages of 500 to 2000 mg daily, respectively. The corresponding between-group differences in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ranged from 0.6% to 2.0% at dosages of 500 to 2000 mg daily, respectively. All between-group differences were significant (P < 0.05) for both fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c at week 7, week 11, and endpoint, except for the difference between placebo and metformin 500 mg in fasting plasma glucose at endpoint (P = 0.054). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 15% of patients in the placebo group and in 28% in the metformin group (P = 0.02); these were primarily manifested as digestive disturbances, such as diarrhea.
                Metformin lowered fasting plasma glucose and HbA1c generally in a dose-related manner. Benefits were observed with as little as 500 mg of metformin; maximal benefits were observed at the upper limits of the recommended daily dosage. All dosages were well tolerated. Metformin appears to be a useful therapeutic option for physicians who wish to titrate drug therapy to achieve target glucose concentrations. The effect of metformin treatment was studied in 13 patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), whose fasting plasma glucose concentration was greater than 10 mmol/L with maximal sulfonylurea doses. Patients were studied before and 3 months after receiving 2.5 g/day metformin. The fasting plasma glucose concentration (12.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 8.8 +/- 0.7 mmol/L), mean hourly postprandial plasma glucose concentration from 0800-1600 h (14.0 +/- 1 vs. 9.4 +/- 0.9 mmol/L), and glycosylated hemoglobin level (12.3 +/- 0.6% vs. 9.0 +/- 0.6%) were all significantly (P less than 0.005-0.001) lower after the administration of metformin. The improvement in glycemic control was associated with a 24% increase (P less than 0.05) in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake during glucose clamp studies and a 16% decrease in basal hepatic glucose production (P less than 0.05). Mean hourly concentrations of plasma insulin (411 +/- 73 vs. 364 +/- 73 pmol/L) and FFA concentrations (440 +/- 31 vs. 390 +/- 40 mumol/L) were also lower after 3 months of metformin treatment. However, neither insulin binding nor insulin internalization by isolated monocytes changed in response to metformin. Finally, plasma triglyceride, very low density lipoprotein triglyceride, and very low density lipoprotein cholesterol were significantly decreased (P less than 0.01-0.001), and high density lipoprotein cholesterol was significantly increased (P less than 0.001) after metformin treatment. Thus, the addition of metformin to sulfonylurea-treated patients with NIDDM not in good glycemic control significantly lowered fasting and postprandial plasma glucose concentrations, presumably due to the combination of enhanced glucose uptake and decreased hepatic glucose production. Since the dyslipidemia present in these patients also improved, the results suggest that metformin may be of significant clinical utility in patients with NIDDM not well controlled with sulfonylurea compounds. Both ectopic fat accumulation and changes of the amount of several adipocyte secreting proteins (adipokines) are thought to contribute to the development of insulin resistance associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. We have now investigated the effects of 2 insulin-sensitizing drugs, pioglitazone and metformin, on body fat composition and serum adipokine concentrations in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A total of 41 diabetic patients were treated with pioglitazone (n =21) or metformin (n =20) for 6 months. Intramyocellular lipid content (IMCL) and hepatic lipid content as well as the areas of subcutaneous and visceral fat deposits in the abdomen were determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy before and after drug treatment. The serum concentrations of adiponectin and retinol binding protein 4 were also determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Pioglitazone treatment reduced both hepatic lipid content (12.0 +/- 6.1 vs 8.4 +/- 3.7 arbitrary units [AU], P < .01) and IMCL (8.4 +/- 3.6 vs 6.3 +/- 2.4 AU/creatine, P < .01), whereas metformin reduced only IMCL (7.0 +/- 3.6 vs 5.8 +/- 2.0 AU/creatine, P < .05). Although the areas of visceral and subcutaneous fat were not significantly affected by treatment with either drug, pioglitazone induced a significant reduction in the ratio of visceral to subcutaneous fat area (0.92 +/- 0.41 vs 0.85 +/- 0.41, P < .05). Pioglitazone treatment also resulted in a marked increase in serum adiponectin concentration (5.6 +/- 4.1 vs 16.2 +/- 9.9 microg/mL, P < .0001) and a small but significant decrease in serum retinol binding protein 4 concentration (73.4 +/- 25.1 vs 65.1 +/- 23.7 microg/mL, P < .05). These results suggest that pioglitazone may improve insulin sensitivity both by affecting serum adipokine concentrations and by reducing the intracellular triglyceride content of liver and skeletal muscle in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus. nan To evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, a new dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, for 26 weeks at once-daily doses of 12.5 and 25 mg in combination with metformin in patients whose HbA(1c) levels were inadequately controlled on metformin alone.
                Patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control (HbA(1c) 7.0-10.0%) were randomised to continue a stable daily metformin dose regimen (> or = 1500 mg) plus the addition of placebo (n = 104) or alogliptin at once-daily doses of 12.5 (n = 213) or 25 mg (n = 210). HbA(1c), insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations were determined over a period of 26 weeks.
                Alogliptin at either dose produced least squares mean (SE) decreases from baseline in HbA(1c) of -0.6 (0.1)% and in FPG of -17.0 (2.5) mg/dl [-1.0 (0.1) mmol/l], decreases that were significantly (p < 0.001) greater than those observed with placebo. The between treatment differences (alogliptin - placebo) in FPG reached statistical significance (p < 0.001) as early as week 1 and persisted for the duration of the study. Overall, adverse events (AEs) observed with alogliptin were not substantially different from those observed with placebo. This includes low event rates for gastrointestinal side effects and hypoglycaemic episodes. There was no dose-related pattern of AE reporting between alogliptin groups and few serious AEs were reported.
                Alogliptin is an effective and safe treatment for type 2 diabetes when added to metformin for patients not sufficiently controlled on metformin monotherapy. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of taspoglutide (R1583/BIM51077), a human once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.
                Type 2 diabetic (n = 306) patients who failed to obtain glycemic control (A1C 7-9.5%) despite 1,500 mg metformin daily were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of double-blind subcutaneous treatment with placebo or taspoglutide, either 5, 10, or 20 mg once weekly or 10 or 20 mg once every 2 weeks, and followed for 4 additional weeks. All patients received their previously established dose of metformin throughout the study. Glycemic control was assessed by change in A1C (percent) from baseline.
                Significantly greater (P < 0.0001) reductions in A1C from a mean +/- SD baseline of 7.9 +/- 0.7% were observed in all taspoglutide groups compared with placebo after 8 weeks of treatment: -1.0 +/- 0.1% (5 mg once weekly), -1.2 +/- 0.1% (10 mg once weekly), -1.2 +/- 0.1% (20 mg once weekly), -0.9 +/- 0.1% (10 mg Q2W), and -1.0 +/- 0.1% (20 mg Q2W) vs. -0.2 +/- 0.1% with placebo. After 8 weeks, body weight loss was significantly greater in the 10 mg (-2.1 +/- 0.3 kg, P = 0.0035 vs. placebo) and 20 mg (-2.8 +/- 0.3 kg, P < 0.0001) once-weekly groups and the 20 mg once every 2 weeks (-1.9 +/- 0.3 kg, P = 0.0083) group than with placebo (-0.8 +/- 0.3 kg). The most common adverse event was dose-dependent, transient, mild-to-moderate nausea; the incidence of hypoglycemia was very low.
                Taspoglutide used in combination with metformin significantly improves fasting and postprandial glucose control and induces weight loss, with a favorable tolerability profile. The efficacy and safety of adding liraglutide (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) to metformin were compared with addition of placebo or glimepiride to metformin in subjects previously treated with oral antidiabetes (OAD) therapy.
                In this 26-week, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group trial, 1,091 subjects were randomly assigned (2:2:2:1:2) to once-daily liraglutide (either 0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg/day injected subcutaneously), to placebo, or to glimepiride (4 mg once daily). All treatments were in combination therapy with metformin (1g twice daily). Enrolled subjects (aged 25-79 years) had type 2 diabetes, A1C of 7-11% (previous OAD monotherapy for > or =3 months) or 7-10% (previous OAD combination therapy for > or =3 months), and BMI < or =40 kg/m(2).
                A1C values were significantly reduced in all liraglutide groups versus the placebo group (P < 0.0001) with mean decreases of 1.0% for 1.8 mg liraglutide, 1.2 mg liraglutide, and glimepiride and 0.7% for 0.6 mg liraglutide and an increase of 0.1% for placebo. Body weight decreased in all liraglutide groups (1.8-2.8 kg) compared with an increase in the glimepiride group (1.0 kg; P < 0.0001). The incidence of minor hypoglycemia with liraglutide ( approximately 3%) was comparable to that with placebo but less than that with glimepiride (17%; P < 0.001). Nausea was reported by 11-19% of the liraglutide-treated subjects versus 3-4% in the placebo and glimepiride groups. The incidence of nausea declined over time.
                In subjects with type 2 diabetes, once-daily liraglutide induced similar glycemic control, reduced body weight, and lowered the occurrence of hypoglycemia compared with glimepiride, when both had background therapy of metformin. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, on 24-h glucose control when added to the regimen of patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control on metformin therapy.
                In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, two-period crossover study, patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy (i.e. on a stable dose of > or = 1500 mg/day for > or = 6 weeks prior to the screening visit and an haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > or = 6.5% and <10% and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or = 240 mg/dl) were recruited for participation. A total of 28 patients (baseline HbA(1c) range = 6.5-9.6%) receiving metformin were randomized into one of two treatment sequences: the addition of placebo for 4 weeks followed by the addition of sitagliptin 50 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) for 4 weeks, or vice versa. At the end of each treatment period, patients were domiciled for frequent blood sampling over 24 h. The primary endpoint was 24-h weighted mean glucose (WMG) and secondary endpoints included change in FPG, mean of 7 daily self-blood glucose measurements (MDG) and fructosamine. beta-cell function was assessed from glucose and C-peptide concentrations were measured during the 5-h period after a standard breakfast meal by using the C-peptide minimal model.
                Despite a carryover effect from period 1 to period 2, the combined period 1 and period 2 results for glycaemic endpoints were statistically significant for sitagliptin relative to placebo when added to ongoing metformin therapy. To account for the carryover effect, the period 1 results were also compared between the groups. Following period 1, there were significant least-squares (LS) mean reductions in 24-h WMG of 32.8 mg/dl, significant LS mean reduction from baseline in MDG of 28 mg/dl, FPG of 20.3 mg/dl and fructosamine of 33.7 mmol/l in patients treated with sitagliptin relative to placebo (p < 0.05). When added to ongoing metformin therapy, parameters of beta-cell function were significantly improved with sitagliptin compared with placebo. No weight gain or increases in gastrointestinal adverse events or hypoglycaemia events were observed with sitagliptin relative to placebo during this study.
                In this study, the addition of sitagliptin 50 mg b.i.d. to ongoing metformin therapy improved 24-h glycaemic control and beta-cell function, and was generally well tolerated in patients with type 2 diabetes. Abnormalities in free fatty acid (FFA) metabolism are an intrinsic feature of type II diabetes mellitus and may even play a role in the development of glycaemic imbalance. This study investigated whether the anti-diabetic drug metformin can reduce FFA levels in clinical practice and whether this correlates with its anti-diabetic effect. For 6 months metformin was added to sulfonylurea therapy in 68 type II diabetic outpatients with poor glycaemic control, being administered before meals and at bed-time. Basal and daily area-under-the-curve (AUC) glucose levels dropped (both P < 0.0005) like basal and daily AUC FFA levels (P < 0.004 and P < 0.001 respectively) reductions were all correlated (P < 0.001 and P < 0.003 respectively). Reductions in fasting and daily AUC glucose correlated more closely with body fat distribution, expressed by waist-hip ratio (WHR) (P < 0.006 and P < 0.004 respectively), than with the body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.02 and P < 0.04 respectively). Similarly fasting and daily AUC FFA correlated with WHR (P < 0.007 and P < 0.01 respectively) but not with BMI (both P = ns). Subdividing male and female diabetic patients into groups with low and high WHRs, fasting and daily AUC glucose were reduced in men (P < 0.01 and P < 0.02) and in women (P < 0.02 and P < 0.04 respectively) with low WHRs less than in men and in women with higher WHRs (for each gender P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0002, respectively). Decreases in fasting and daily AUC FFA, which did not reach significance in either men or women with low WHRs, were statistically significant in men (P < 0.03 and P < 0.01 respectively) and in women (P < 0.02 and P < 0.005 respectively) with high WHRs. These findings suggest that an improvement in FFA plasma levels might contribute to metformin's anti-diabetic activity which appears to be more marked in patients with high WHRs. Moreover adding a bed-time dosage to the standard administration at meal times seems to be an effective therapeutical strategy. The UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that treatment with metformin decreases macrovascular morbidity and mortality independent of glycaemic control. We hypothesized that metformin may achieve this by improving endothelial function and chronic, low-grade inflammation. Data on this issue are scarce and we therefore tested, in the setting of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial, whether metformin can affect endothelial function and low-grade inflammation.
                The Hyperinsulinaemia the Outcome of its Metabolic Effects (HOME) trial is a double-blind trial, in which all patients were randomized to receive either metformin or placebo in addition to insulin therapy. At the beginning and the end of a 16-week treatment period fasting blood samples were drawn and a physical examination was carried out.
                The trial was conducted in the outpatient clinics of three nonacademic hospitals (Hoogeveen, Meppel and Coevorden; the Netherlands).
                Patients were included if they were between 30 and 80 years of age; had received a diagnosis of diabetes after the age of 25; had never had an episode of ketoacidosis; and their blood glucose-lowering treatment previously consisted of oral agents but now only consisted of either insulin (n = 345) or insulin and metformin (n = 45). We excluded pregnant women and women trying to become pregnant, patients with a Cockroft-Gault-estimated creatinine clearance <50 mL min(-1), or low plasma cholinesterase (reference value <3.5 units L(-1)), patients with congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association class III/IV), or patients with other serious medical or psychiatric disease. A total of 745 eligible patients were approached; 390 gave informed consent and were randomized (196 metformin, 194 placebo). About 353 patients completed 16 weeks of treatment (171 metformin, 182 placebo).
                The HOME trial was designed to study the metabolic and cardiovascular effects of metformin during a follow-up of 4 years. Presented here are the results of an interim analysis after 16 weeks of treatment.
                When compared with placebo, metformin treatment was associated with an increase in urinary albumin excretion of 21% (-1 to +48; P = 0.06); a decrease in plasma von Willebrand factor of 6% (-10 to -2; P = 0.0007); a decrease in soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 of 4% (-7 to -2; P = 0.0002); a decrease in soluble E-selectin of 6% (-10 to -2; P = 0.008); a decrease in tissue-type plasminogen activator of 16% (-20 to -12; P < 0.0001); and a decrease in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 of 20% (-27 to -10; P = 0.0001). These changes could not be explained by metformin-associated changes in glycaemic control, body weight or insulin dose. Markers of inflammation, i.e. C-reactive protein and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, did not change with metformin treatment.
                In patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, metformin treatment was associated with improvement of endothelial function, which was largely unrelated to changes in glycaemic control, but not with improvement of chronic, low-grade inflammation. To compare the effect of adding nateglinide or placebo on postprandial glucose excursions (PPGEs), glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), diurnal glucose profiles and hypoglycaemia in patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with the combination of basal insulin and metformin.
                This was an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, study in five centres. Patients with Type 2 diabetes (n = 88, age 56.0 +/- 0.9 years, duration of diabetes 9.4 +/- 0.5 years, HbA(1c) 7.8 +/- 0.1%, body mass index 32.4 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)) treated with basal insulin and metformin entered a 24-week period, during which basal insulin was titrated to optimize glucose control. Thereafter, the patients were randomized to receive either nateglinide (120 mg three times daily) or placebo before their main meals for 24 weeks.
                During the optimization period, HbA(1c) decreased by -0.3 +/- 0.1 and -0.4 +/- 0.2% (NS) and insulin doses increased by 10.0 IU (2.0-32.0) [0.09 IU/kg (0.02-0.34)] and 10.0 IU (0.0-19.0) [0.11 IU/kg (0.0-0.25)] (NS) in the nateglinide and placebo groups. Mean postprandial glucose during weeks 20-24 averaged 9.0 +/- 0.3 and 10.0 +/- 0.3 mmol/l in the nateglinide and placebo groups (P = 0.025) and mean PPGE averaged 2.4 +/- 0.2 and 3.1 +/- 0.2 mmol/l, respectively (P = 0.019). At 24 weeks as compared with 0 weeks, mean HbA(1c) had decreased by 0.41 +/- 0.12% in the nateglinide group and by 0.04 +/- 0.12% in the placebo group (P = 0.023). The frequency of confirmed, symptomatic hypoglycaemia was 7.7 episodes/patient-year vs. 4.7 episodes/patient-year in the nateglinide and placebo groups (P = 0.031).
                Addition of a short-acting insulin secretagogue at main meals improves postprandial hyperglycaemia during combination therapy with basal insulin and metformin, but increases the frequency of hypolycaemia. In a single blind crossover study, ciclazindol, 10-(m-chlorophenyl)-2, 3, 4, 10-tetrahydropyrimide (1, 2 alpha) indol-10-ol hydrochloride (Fig. 1), has been found to have hypoglycaemic action, and to produce reduction in appetite and weight. The mode of action appears to be different from either biguanides or sulphonylureas. Side-effects were few and mild. Metformin 500 mg b.d. had comparable hypoglycaemic effect but did not suppress appetite. Ciclazindol may be useful as a mild oral hypoglycaemic agent for obese patients, and would be suitable for once daily administration. To compare the efficacy and safety of two analog insulins as starting regimens in insulin-naïve Type 2 diabetes patients.
                In this randomized, open-label parallel study, twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (30% soluble and 70% protaminated insulin aspart; BIAsp 30) plus metformin (met) was compared with once-daily insulin glargine (glarg) plus glimepiride (glim) in 255 insulin-naïve patients (131 male; mean+/-SD age, 61.2+/-9.1 years). Mean baseline HbA (1c) (+/-SD) was 9.2+/-1.4% and 8.9+/-1.3% for BIAsp 30 plus met ( N=128) and glarg plus glim ( N=127), respectively ( P=0.0747). Primary endpoint was the difference in absolute change in HbA (1c) between groups after 26 weeks of treatment.
                HbA (1c) change was significantly greater in the BIAsp 30 plus met group than the glarg plus glim group (between-group difference: -0.5% (95% CI: -0.8; -0.2); P=0.0002). Mean prandial plasma glucose increment was significantly lower for BIAsp 30 plus met compared with glarg plus glim: 1.4+/-1.4 mmol/l vs. 2.2+/-1.8 mmol/l; P=0.0002. During the maintenance phase (weeks 6-26), one major hypoglycemic episode occurred in each group; 20.3% and 9% of patients experienced minor hypoglycemic episodes in the BIAsp 30 plus met and glarg plus glim groups, respectively ( P=0.0124). At end-of-trial, mean daily insulin doses were 0.40 U/kg BIAsp 30 and 0.39 U/kg glarg. Glarg plus glim-treated patients experienced significant weight gain of 1.5 kg (95% CI: 0.84; 2.19; P<0.0001). Weight change with BIAsp 30 plus met of +0.7 kg was not statistically significant (95% CI: -0.07; 1.42; P=0.0762).
                Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim. Physicians may use either insulin or exenatide injections for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have poor glycemic control despite taking oral blood glucose-lowering drugs.
                To compare effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is suboptimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea.
                26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.
                82 outpatient study centers in 13 countries.
                551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.
                Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
                Hemoglobin A1c level, fasting plasma glucose level, body weight, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose, standardized test-meal challenge, safety, and tolerability.
                Baseline mean hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2% for patients receiving exenatide and 8.3% for those receiving insulin glargine. At week 26, both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced hemoglobin A1c levels by 1.11% (difference, 0.017 percentage point [95% CI, -0.123 to 0.157 percentage point]). Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide. Body weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine (difference, -4.1 kg [CI, -4.6 to -3.5 kg]). Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).
                The trial was open-label and did not assess clinical complications related to diabetes. Of the 551 participants, 19.4% of those receiving exenatide and 9.7% of those receiving insulin glargine withdrew from the study. Only 21.6% of the insulin glargine group and 8.6% of the exenatide group achieved the target level for fasting plasma glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).
                Exenatide and insulin glargine achieved similar improvements in overall glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with oral combination therapy. Exenatide was associated with weight reduction and had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than insulin glargine. Pioglitazone, metformin, and gliclazide lower HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the effects of these three drugs, used as monotherapy and in combination, on postload glycemia and composite insulin sensitivity index (CISI) in these patients.
                Postload glycemia and CISI were analyzed for 940 patients who had oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) in four multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group clinical trials (pioglitazone versus metformin, pioglitazone versus gliclazide, pioglitazone plus sulfonylurea versus metformin plus sulfonylurea, and pioglitazone plus metformin versus gliclazide plus metformin). Plasma glucose and insulin were determined during the 3-h OGTT performed at baseline and after 1 year of therapy. Incremental area under the curve for glucose was the surrogate for postload glycemia. CISI was calculated using the formula {10,000/ radical of [(fasting glucose x fasting insulin) x (mean glucose x mean insulin)]} during the OGTT.
                In monotherapy, pioglitazone reduced postload glycemia and enhanced CISI more than metformin and gliclazide. In combination therapy, pioglitazone plus sulfonylurea reduced postload glycemia and increased CISI more than metformin plus sulfonylurea. Pioglitazone plus metformin also decreased postload glycemia and increased CISI more than gliclazide plus metformin.
                Pioglitazone improves postload glycemia and CISI more than metformin or gliclazide when used as monotherapy or in combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared with other insulin regimens, combination therapy with oral hypoglycemic agents and bedtime insulin produces similar improvement in glycemic control but induces less weight gain.
                To determine whether bedtime insulin regimens differ with respect to their effects on weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes.
                Randomized, controlled trial.
                Four outpatient clinics at central hospitals.
                96 patients (mean age, 58 +/- 1 years; mean body mass index, 29 +/- 1 kg/m2) whose type 2 diabetes was poorly controlled with sulfonylurea therapy (mean glycosylated hemoglobin value, 9.9% +/- 0.2%; mean fasting plasma glucose level, 11.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/L [214 +/- 5 mg/dL]).
                Random assignment to 1 year of treatment with bedtime intermediate-acting insulin plus glyburide (10.5 mg) and placebo, metformin (2 g) and placebo, glyburide and metformin, or a second injection of intermediate-acting insulin in the morning. Patients were taught to adjust the bedtime insulin dose on the basis of fasting glucose measurements.
                Body weight, biochemical and symptomatic hypoglycemias, and indices of glycemic control.
                At 1 year, body weight remained unchanged in patients receiving bedtime insulin plus metformin (mean change, 0.9 +/- 1.2 kg; P < 0.001 compared with all other groups) but increased by 3.9 +/- 0.7 kg, 3.6 +/- 1.2 kg, and 4.6 +/- 1.0 kg in patients receiving bedtime insulin plus glyburide, those receiving bedtime insulin plus both oral drugs, and those receiving bedtime and morning insulin, respectively. The greatest decrease in the glycosylated hemoglobin value was observed in the bedtime insulin and metformin group (from 9.7% +/- 0.4% to 7.2% +/- 0.2% [difference, -2.5 +/- 0.4 percentage points] at 1 year; P < 0.001 compared with 0 months and P < 0.05 compared with other groups). This group also had significantly fewer symptomatic and biochemical cases of hypoglycemia (P < 0.05) than the other groups.
                Combination therapy with bedtime insulin plus metformin prevents weight gain. This regimen also seems superior to other bedtime insulin regimens with respect to improvement in glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of treatment with insulin alone, insulin plus metformin, or insulin plus troglitazone in individuals with type 2 diabetes.
                A total of 88 type 2 diabetic subjects using insulin monotherapy (baseline HbA(lc) 8.7%) were randomly assigned to insulin alone (n = 31), insulin plus metformin (n = 27), or insulin plus troglitazone (n = 30) for 4 months. The insulin dose was increased only in the insulin group. Metformin was titrated to a maximum dose of 2,000 mg and troglitazone to 600 mg.
                HbA(lc) levels decreased in all groups, the lowest level occurring in the insulin plus troglitazone group (insulin alone to 7.0%, insulin plus metformin to 7.1%, and insulin plus troglitazone to 6.4%, P < 0.0001). The dose of insulin increased by 55 units/day in the insulin alone group (P < 0.0001) and decreased by 1.4 units/day in the insulin plus metformin group and 12.8 units/day in the insulin plus troglitazone group (insulin plus metformin versus insulin plus troglitazone, P = 0.004). Body weight increased by 0.5 kg in the insulin plus metformin group, whereas the other two groups gained 4.4 kg (P < 0.0001 vs. baseline). Triglyceride and VLDL triglyceride levels significantly improved only in the insulin plus troglitazone group. Subjects taking metformin experienced significantly more gastrointestinal side effects and less hypoglycemia.
                Aggressive insulin therapy significantly improved glycemic control in type 2 diabetic subjects to levels comparable with those achieved by adding metformin to insulin therapy. Troglitazone was the most effective in lowering HbA(lc), total daily insulin dose, and triglyceride levels. However, treatment with insulin plus metformin was advantageous in avoiding weight gain and hypoglycemia. The authors evaluated the efficacy of treatment with the metformin-glibenclamide combination in 30 non-insulin dependent overweight diabetic patients in poor metabolic control during sulfonylurea treatment. After three months' therapy, a significant reduction of glycaemia, insulinaemia and fructosamine were found. Therefore, the addition of biguanides in those patients, was able to reduce blood glucose levels and to improve insulin resistance. In addition the metformin glibenclamide combination never produced relevant side effects of lactic acidosis, which is the most dangerous event during biguanide treatment. To evaluate the long-term efficacy of acarbose, an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, in improving glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
                A 1-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
                Seven university-affiliated, community-based, tertiary care diabetes clinics.
                354 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus were recruited; 77 were being treated with diet alone, 83 with diet and metformin, 103 with diet and sulfonylurea, and 91 with diet and insulin. Patients in each treatment group were randomly assigned to either acarbose or placebo for 1 year. Eighty-seven percent of patients receiving acarbose and 92% of those receiving placebo were included in the efficacy analysis (n = 316).
                At baseline and at 3-month intervals, levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, fasting and postprandial serum C-peptide, and fasting serum lipids were measured.
                Compared with placebo, acarbose treatment caused a significant decrease in the mean postprandial plasma glucose peak (90 minutes) in all four groups (19.0 +/- 0.4 mmol/L to 15.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/L; P < 0.001). Analysis of the postprandial plasma glucose incremental area under the curve showed that the change from baseline to the end of the treatment period differed for placebo and acarbose recipients by 4.73 mmol.h/L in the diet alone group (P < 0.001), 2.06 mmol.h/L in the metformin group (P = 0.01), 2.65 mmol.h/L in the sulfonylurea group (P < 0.001), and 3.13 mmol.h/L in the insulin group (P = 0.001). Corresponding decreases in HbA1c levels occurred; these were 0.9% in the diet alone group (P = 0.005), 0.8% in the metformin group (P = 0.011), 0.9% in the sulfonylurea group (P = 0.002), and 0.4% in the insulin group (P = 0.077). Acarbose did not significantly affect mean serum C-peptide or mean serum lipid levels.
                Acarbose improved long-term glycemic control in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus regardless of concomitant antidiabetic medication. This 3-month study compared the effect on overall glycemic control of adding biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) and premixed human insulin 30/70 (BHI30) to metformin (met) in insulin-naïve, obese patients (30 males/20 females) with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). MATERIAL/SUBJECTS: At baseline, patients had a mean age of 58.7 yr, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 9.5%, and body mass index 34+/-2 kg/m2. Patients received either twice-daily BIAsp30 (no.=20) or twice-daily BHI30 (no.=30), and continued to receive maximal doses (2000 mg) of met for the duration of the study, but sulphonylurea oral antidiabetic drugs were discontinued. Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in HbA1c in both groups at study end. Safety endpoints included hypoglycemic episodes and weight gain.
                Both groups reduced HbA1c by end of trial: BIAsp30 + met by 2.5% [2.16-2.86%; 95% confidence interval (CI)]; BHI30 + met by 1.18% (0.98- 1.39%; 95% CI), giving a significantly better HbA1c reduction with BIAsp30 + met (1.33%; p<0.05). Post-prandial plasma glucose decreased in both groups, by 6.38 mmol/l in patients treated with BIAsp30 + met, and by 4.34 mmol/l in those treated with BHI30 + met (p<0.05). Fasting plasma glucose also decreased in both groups, with a slightly larger decrease seen in BIAsp30 patients than in BHI30 patients (7.36 mmol/l at end of study vs 7.82 mmol/l; p=ns). Subjects treated with BIAsp30 gained less weight than those receiving BHI30 (0.3+/-0.1 kg vs 1.2+/-0.4 kg). There was no significant difference in the frequency or number of hypoglycemic episodes between groups.
                Adding BIAsp30 to met in obese patients with T2DM results in better glycemic control and less weight gain than adding BHI30. Nineteen obese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated for periods of 3 months with placebo, guar gum (5 g three times daily) and metformin (500 mg three times daily) in a randomized double-blind, double-placebo, cross-over study. Both active agents decreased fasting blood glucose from 11.4 +/- 3.7 mmol l-1 (mean +/- SD) to 8.6 +/- 2.8 mmol l-1 on metformin (p less than 0.001) and to 9.5 +/- 3.9 mmol l-1 on guar gum (p less than 0.01). Metformin significantly reduced the very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol concentration from 0.62 (+0.73, -0.34) mmol l-1 (geometric mean (+SD, -SD)) to 0.43 (+0.58, -0.25) mmol l-1, (p less than 0.02), but unless hyperlipidaemia was present there were no changes in other serum lipid or lipoprotein levels. In patients with serum cholesterol greater than 6.5 mmol l-1 decreases in serum triglycerides from 3.29 (+3.27, -1.64) to 2.46 (+2.55, -1.25) mmol l-1 (p less than 0.02) occurred with metformin. In these patients guar gum produced a reduction in serum cholesterol (from 7.70 +/- 0.90 to 6.41 +/- 1.11 mmol l-1, p less than 0.01) due to an effect on low density lipoproteins. These differential effects may be important in planning therapy when hyperlipidaemia accompanies Type 2 diabetes. Basal plasma tissue type plasminogen activator (t-PA) and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAl-1) antigen levels were studied in 49 non-insulin dependent diabetic patients (23 men, 26 women: ages 51.3 +/- 14.9 years) and 16 age matched non-diabetic subjects (9 men, 7 women: ages 49.8 +/- 12.2 years) as a control group. Compared to a control group, the diabetic patients had a significantly higher mean t-PA antigen (5.15 +/- 3.02 vs 3.20 +/- 2.30 ng/ml) and PAl-1 antigen (35.89 +/- 18.59 vs 17.60 +/- 15.36 ng/ml) levels (p < 0.05). Plasma t-PA antigen level was not influenced by each treatment modality. There was a significant decrease of plasma PAl-1 antigen level after Metformin administration compared to that of before Metformin administration (39.74 +/- 19.39 vs 25.14 +/- 16.18 ng/ml) (p < 0.05), and the insulin-treated group showed a tendency for a decrease of plasma PAl-1 antigen levels after insulin administration but this did not reach statistical significance (29.93 +/- 15.37 vs 17.32 +/- 10.60 ng/ml). Sulfonylurea did not change both plasma t-PA and PAl-1 antigen levels. In conclusion, diabetic patients have high t-PA and PAl-1 antigen levels. Biguanide reduced plasma PAl-1 antigen levels, which might play some helpful role in the improvement of chronic complications in NIDDM. To assess the use of a new repaglinide/metformin fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
                In this 26-week, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group trial, subjects poorly controlled with mono- or dual-oral antidiabetic therapy were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive a repaglinide/metformin FDC tablet either two times daily (BID) or three times daily (TID) or a rosiglitazone/metformin FDC tablet BID. The primary objective comprised two hypotheses tested in a hierarchical order: (i) that treatment with the repaglinide/metformin FDC BID is non-inferior to that of a rosiglitazone/metformin FDC tablet BID as measured by changes in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (results presented here) and (ii) if true, that treatment with the repaglinide/metformin FDC BID was non-inferior to that of the repaglinide/metformin FDC TID as measured by changes in HbA1c (results presented in a companion paper). Additional efficacy and safety end-points were also assessed.
                Of the 561 subjects randomized, 383 completed the study. Reductions in HbA1c values became apparent at earlier times for repaglinide/metformin FDC BID treatment than rosiglitazone/metformin FDC BID, and final changes in HbA1c were not significantly different between treatment arms (p = 0.8186); thus, the predefined statistical criterion for non-inferiority was met. Overall adverse event profiles were comparable between treatment groups, and no major hypoglycaemic episodes were reported during the study.
                The repaglinide/metformin FDC BID regimen showed efficacy that was non-inferior to that of the rosiglitazone/metformin FDC BID regimen currently in clinical use and a more rapid reduction of HbA1c values. Thus, repaglinide/metformin FDC BID is a clinically feasible alternative to rosiglitazone/metformin FDC BID. In type 2 diabetes, metformin reduces cardiovascular risk beyond the effect of glycaemic control. Since oxidative stress and the consequent enhanced platelet activation contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes, we hypothesized that metformin could reduce oxidative stress in this condition.
                We randomized 26 newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic subjects to assume either metformin (M, n = 13) or gliclazide (G, n = 13) for 12 weeks. Drugs were titrated as needed to achieve good glycaemic control. Before and after treatment, we determined blood glucose, insulin, HbA(1c), vitamin A and E levels and 8-iso-PGF(2alpha) and 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) urinary excretion, an in vivo oxidative stress and a thromboxane-dependent platelet activation marker, respectively.
                Notwithstanding a comparable improvement in metabolic control, 8-iso-PGF(2alpha) (M from 708 +/- 32 to 589 +/- 45 pg/mg cr, p < 0.001; G from 646 +/- 80 to 665 +/- 79, pg/mg cr, p = ns) and 11-dehydro-thromboxane B(2) (M from 2190 +/- 196 to 1753 +/- 150 pg/mg cr, p < 0.05; G from 2048 +/- 202 to 1923 +/- 223, pg/mg cr, p = ns) urinary excretion decreased after metformin but not after gliclazide treatment. After metformin, vitamin A and E levels significantly increased while they remained unchanged after gliclazide.
                These data suggest that metformin could improve oxidative stress, preserve antioxidant function and restrain platelet activation in type 2 diabetes.
                Copyright (c) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. To compare the effect of glimepiride in combination with metformin with monotherapy of each drug on glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetic patients.
                Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group multicentre study conducted in France. Type 2 diabetic patients aged 35-70 years inadequately controlled by metformin monotherapy 2550 mg daily for at least 4 weeks were randomized to either metformin, glimepiride or metformin and glimepiride.
                Three hundred and seventy-two patients aged 56 +/- 8 years were treated for 5 months. Combination treatment was significantly more efficient in controlling HbA1c (% change + 0.07 +/- 1.20 for metformin, + 0.27 +/- 1.10 for glimepiride, -0.74 +/- 0.96 for combination treatment, P < 0.001), fasting blood glucose (FBG) (mmol/l change + 0.8 +/- 0.4 for metformin, + 0.7 +/- 3.1 for glimepiride and -1.8 +/- 2.2 for combination treatment, P < 0.001) and post-prandial blood glucose (PPBG) (mmol/l change + 1.1 +/- 5.9 for metformin, + 0.1 +/- 5.1 for glimepiride and -2.6 +/- 3.9 for combination treatment, P < 0.001) than either glimepiride or metformin alone. There was no significant difference between metformin or glimepiride monotherapy with respect to the change in HbA1c or FBG; however, glimepiride was significantly more effective than metformin in reducing PPBG. The incidence of symptomatic hypoglycaemia was higher in the combination group than in either monotherapy group (P = 0.039).
                Addition of glimepiride to metformin in Type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by metformin alone resulted in superior glycaemic control compared with glimepiride or metformin monotherapy. To compare the effects of chronic glibenclamide and metformin therapy on blood pressure (BP) and cardiovascular responsiveness in patients with NIDDM.
                Fourteen patients with NIDDM received metformin or glibenclamide for 1 month in a double-blind, randomized crossover study. At the end of each treatment period, patients were tested for forearm vascular responsiveness to intrabrachial arterial infusion of diazoxide (an ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener), acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and norepinephrine, BP responses to intravenous infusions of NE and angiotensin II, BP responses to cold pressor testing and isometric exercise, and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring.
                Metformin and glibenclamide produced similar glycemic control. Mean 24-h BPs did not differ between the two groups, but mean 24-h heart rates were significantly lower (75 +/- 6 bpm vs. 80 +/- 6 bpm) on glibenclamide therapy than on metformin. Plasma norepinephrine levels were significantly higher on glibenclamide (6.41 +/- 1.77 vs. 4.26 +/- 1.54 mmol/l, P < 0.01), and systolic BP responses to intravenous norepinephrine and angiotensin II were significantly higher on glibenclamide than on metformin (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05, respectively). Systolic BP responses to cold pressor testing appeared higher on glibenclamide than on metformin, but the difference did not quite achieve statistical significance (P = 0.052). Baseline forearm vascular resistance did not differ between the two drugs, nor did forearm vascular resistance responses to diazoxide, acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside, and norepinephrine differ.
                Glibenclamide therapy is accompanied by greater systolic BP responses to norepinephrine and angiotensin II and higher plasma norepinephrine levels than those that occur on metformin therapy. Lower heart rates on glibenclamide therapy despite evidence of greater sympathetic activity suggests that glibenclamide may have negative chronotropic effects. The metabolic effects and mechanism of action of metformin are still poorly understood, despite the fact that it has been used to treat patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) for more than 30 years.
                In 10 obese patients with NIDDM, we used a combination of isotope dilution, indirect calorimetry, bioimpedance, and tissue-balance techniques to assess the effects of metformin on systemic lactate, glucose, and free-fatty-acid turnover; lactate oxidation and the conversion of lactate to glucose; skeletal-muscle glucose and lactate metabolism; body composition; and energy expenditure before and after four months of treatment.
                Metformin treatment decreased the mean (+/- SD) glycosylated hemoglobin value from 13.2 +/- 2.2 percent to 10.5 +/- 1.6 percent (P < 0.001) and reduced fasting plasma glucose concentrations from 220 +/- 41 to 155 +/- 28 mg per deciliter (12.2 +/- 0.7 to 8.6 +/- 0.5 mmol per liter) (P < 0.001). Although resting energy expenditure did not change, the patients lost 2.7 +/- 1.3 kg of weight (P < 0.001), 88 percent of which was adipose tissue. The mean (+/- SE) rate of plasma glucose turnover (hepatic glucose output and systemic glucose disposal) decreased from 2.8 +/- 0.2 to 2.0 +/- 0.2 mg per kilogram of body weight per minute (15.3 +/- 0.9 to 10.8 +/- 0.9 mumol per kilogram per minute) (P < 0.001), as a result of a decrease in hepatic glucose output; systemic glucose clearance did not change. The rate of conversion of lactate to glucose (gluconeogenesis) decreased by 37 percent (P < 0.001), whereas lactate oxidation increased by 25 percent (P < 0.001). There were no changes in the plasma lactate concentration, plasma lactate turnover, muscle lactate release, plasma free-fatty-acid turnover, or uptake of glucose by muscle.
                Metformin acts primarily by decreasing hepatic glucose output, largely by inhibiting gluconeogenesis. It also seems to induce weight loss, preferentially involving adipose tissue. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glimepiride plus metformin in a single presentation, as combined therapy, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) with secondary failure to glibenclamide.
                A randomized, double-blind, multicentric trial was carried out in 104 obese patients with DM2, fasting glucose > 140 mg/dL and glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C) > 8%, in spite of treatment with glibenclamide at maximum doses and medical nutrition therapy for at least the 3 months previous to the study. After randomization, the patients received in titrated way during 3 months one of the following treatments: up to 4 mg of glimepiride, 2 g of metformin or 4 mg of glimepiride plus 2 g of metformin in a single presentation. Efficacy criteria were either a decrease in A1C of 1% or more, or a reduction in A1C of 7% or less. Adverse events were carefully monitored during the study.
                At the end of the study, the decrease in A1C concentration was -0.9 +/- 1.6% (CI 95%: -0.2 to -1.5) in the glimepiride group, -0.7 +/- 2.1% (CI 95%: 0.2 to -1.6) in the metformin group, and -1.3 +/- 1.8 mg/dL (CI 95%: -0.6 to -1.9) in the combined therapy group. The percentage of patients that showed a decrease in AIC of 1% or higher was 35.1, 21.2 and 47.0% in the glimepiride, in the metformin and in the combined therapy groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The percentage of patients with decreased AIC of 7% or less was 18.9, 9.0 and 23.5% in the glimepiride, in the metformin and in the combined therapy groups, respectively (p = 0.01). The frequency of adverse events was similar for all the groups.
                The combined use of glimepiride plus metformin in a single presentation for 3 months showed to be efficacious and safe in patients with DM2 and secondary failure to glibenclamide. Unlike other pharmacological therapies used in obese type 2 diabetic patients, metformin has been shown to improve glycemic control with lower insulin levels and not to involve weight gain. We therefore examined the effect of adjunct metformin in 13 severely obese type 2 diabetic patients (BMI 39.3 +/- 3.9 kg/m2) in suboptimal glycemic control pretreated with intensified insulin therapy. Patients were randomly assigned to either metformin or placebo treatment (double-blind) for 10 weeks and after a 2 week washout period received the opposite treatment, respectively, for 10 additional weeks. HbA1c decreased comparably during placebo (from 8.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.6 +/- 0.3%) and metformin (from 8.5 +/- 0.4 to 7.4 +/- 0.3%, p = 0.29 vs. placebo). Changes in fasting glucose levels were also not different between placebo (from 9.3 +/- 0.7 to 9.5 +/- 0.7 mM) and metformin (from 10.3 +/- 0.5 to 9.5 +/- 0.6 mM, p = 0.44 vs. placebo). Total exogenous insulin requirements decreased from 53 +/- 10 to 35 +/- 7 units during metformin treatment (p = 0.02 vs. placebo). Changes in fasting insulin levels during placebo and metformin treatments were not different (p = 0.11). Metformin had no effect on body weight and serum triglycerides but marginally decreased serum cholesterol levels (from 239 +/- 18 to 211 +/- 14 mg/dl, p = 0.005, p = 0.08 vs. placebo). During the oral glucose tolerance test no differences were observed in the areas under the curve for glucose and insulin while that for C-peptide showed a tendency to increase during metformin administration. We conclude that addition of metformin to insulin treatment in severely obese type 2 diabetic patients improves glycemia but not hyperinsulinemia in comparison to intensive insulin therapy alone. With adjunct metformin, approximately 30% less exogenous insulin is required. With respect to glycemia and lipids, adjunct metformin can be a reasonable treatment alternative in selected obese patients with type 2 diabetes already on intensive insulin therapy. nan To compare the efficacy and safety of acarbose and metformin when added to sulphonylurea therapy in diabetic patients insufficiently controlled with sulphonylureas alone.
                A 12-week, single-centre, placebo-controlled study, with 89 patients randomized to receive acarbose (100 mg t.d.s.), metformin (850 mg b.d.) or placebo in addition to their sulphonylurea therapy. The study was double-blinded with respect to acarbose/placebo and single-blinded for metformin/ acarbose and metformin/placebo. Patients started a strict dietary regimen 1 week before receiving their first dose of acarbose, metformin or placebo. This regimen was individually adjusted to metabolic status and energy requirements.
                The primary endpoint, HbA1c, decreased from baseline in all three groups after 12 weeks. The decrease was greater in the two groups receiving active therapy compared with placebo (acarbose -2.3+/-0.32%; metformin -2.5+/-0.16%; placebo -1.3+/-0.34%). There was no significant difference between acarbose and metformin (P=0.65). Differences between both active therapies and placebo were statistically significant (acarbose P < or = 0.01; metformin P < or = 0.004). Reductions in body weight over the treatment period were seen in all three groups and were greatest in the acarbose group (median weight reduction: acarbose 3.5 kg; metformin, 1.0 kg; placebo 1.4 kg). There were no significant differences in the incidence of gastrointestinal side-effects between the three groups and all regimens were generally well tolerated.
                The results of the study demonstrate the equivalence of acarbose and metformin for improving metabolic control in patients insufficiently controlled with diet and sulphonylureas. Renal hyperfiltration and albuminuria have a deleterious effect on kidney function. Therefore, we studied the effect of metformin on blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetic patients.
                A clinical trial was designed in type 2 diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy. All patients were below the age of 65, normotensive, and without evidence of malignant, hepatic, or cardiovascular disorders. They were randomly allocated to receive glibenclamide or metformin. At baseline and 12 weeks thereafter we measured body mass index (BMI), serum insulin, blood glucose, lipid profile, glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate, renal plasma flow, and urine albumin.
                We studied 23 patients in the glibenclamide group and 28 in the metformin group. There was no difference in baseline variables between the groups. Metabolic control was obtained in both groups. In the metformin group, all the following variables decreased: microalbuminuria was reduced by a mean of 24.2 mg/day (p = 0.008); systolic and diastolic blood pressure by a mean of 5.3 mmHg (p = 0.002) and 3.93 mmHg (p = 0.009), respectively; insulin levels by an average of 11.8 microIU/mL (p = 0.001), and total cholesterol levels and triglycerides by an average of 0.45 and 0.18 mmol/L, respectively. Insulin resistance measured by the homeostasis model decreased more in the metformin group than in the glibenclamide group. Patients treated with glibenclamide had an increase in HDL cholesterol of 0.082 mmol/L (p = 0.01).
                Metformin significantly decreased the urine albumin excretion rate with none of the expected changes in renal hemodynamics, probably due to its favorable effects on blood pressure, lipid profile, metabolic control, and insulin resistance. Pioglitazone has been reported to improve common cardiovascular risk factors in addition to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The changes in cardiovascular risk profile were evaluated comparatively in large cohorts either treated or not with pioglitazone-containing combinations in the current clinical setting within Spain.
                A nationwide prospective, controlled, observational cohort clinical study was performed in 2294 patients with T2DM who started, at the criterion of the treating physician, oral antihyperglycemic treatment with either pioglitazone plus a sulfonylurea (Pio+SU; n=851), pioglitazone plus metformin (Pio+Met; n=723) or a sulfonylurea plus metformin (SU+Met; n=720) due to inadequate control with previous therapy. Serum cholesterol, blood glucose, hemoglobin A1C, blood pressure and certain anthropometric parameters were measured at baseline and after 6 months of treatment.
                Serum high density lipoprotein-cholesterol increased in average (mg/dl) 2.08 with Pio+SU, 2.06 with Pio+Met and 0.67 with SU+Met; while triglycerides decreased (mg/dl) 26.6, 30.6 and 17.6 in the same cohorts. Inter-group differences were significant (p<0.001 in both parameters). Total cholesterol decreased significantly more with SU+Met than in the pioglitazone cohorts. Mean fasting plasma glucose and hemoglobin A1C reductions were significantly greater in the pioglitazone cohorts than in the SU+Met cohort: 27.74, 28.94 and 23.46 mg/dl (p=0.012); and 0.80, 0.87 and 0.71% (p=0.016) with Pio+SU, Pio+Met and SU+Met, respectively. Slight, but significant variations of body weight were also registered in the Pio+SU (+1.4 kg) and SU+Met (-0.7 kg) groups.
                Treatment with pioglitazone was associated with significant improvements of lipid and glycemic parameters that are linked to insulin resistance and cardiovascular risk in patients with T2DM in their routine clinical care. The non-randomised allocation of patients to treatments, inherent to its observational design, is an important limitation of the present study. nan We investigated in a double-blind study whether metformin reduces blood pressure (BP) in patients with Type 2 diabetes intensively treated with insulin.
                A total of 220 patients with Type 2 diabetes were asked to undergo 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (24-h ABPM). One hundred and eighty-two gave informed consent. Eighty-nine were randomized to metformin and 93 to placebo. Thirty-five subjects dropped out (13 placebo, 22 metformin users); 147 patients underwent a second 24-h ABPM, 16 weeks after randomization.
                Systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP (DBP), pulse BP (PP), mean BP (MP) and heart rate (HR) were measured as office BP measurements and as 24-h ABPM for 24-h, day and night. Office BP measurements did not differ significantly between the placebo- and metformin-treated groups for any BP measure, but showed a non-significant trend for SBP reduction with metformin use (mean baseline-adjusted difference, metformin minus placebo: -4.2 mmHg, 95% CI, -9.9 to +1.5; P = 0.15). The baseline-adjusted differences of the ambulatory measurements were -0.2 mmHg (95% CI, -2.9 to +2.6) for the 24-h SBP, and +1.1 mmHg (95% CI, -0.7 to +2.8) for the 24-h DBP. On the whole, BP differences between metformin- and placebo-treated groups were not statistically significant. The only significant difference was for night-time PP (baseline-adjusted difference: -2.2 mmHg; 95% CI, -4.2 to -0.2). These results were not different after adjustment for age and diabetes duration, or for (changes in) body mass index, glycated haemoglobin, insulin dose or plasma homocysteine.
                Metformin does not significantly affect BP in patients with Type 2 diabetes intensively treated with insulin. To investigate the metabolic effects of metformin, as compared with placebo, in type 2 diabetic patients intensively treated with insulin.
                Metformin improves glycemic control in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. Its effect in type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin has not been studied. A total of 390 patients whose type 2 diabetes was controlled with insulin therapy completed a randomized controlled double-blind trial with a planned interim analysis after 16 weeks of treatment. The subjects were selected from three outpatient clinics in regional hospitals and were randomly assigned to either the placebo or metformin group, in addition to insulin therapy. Intensive glucose monitoring with immediate insulin adjustments according to strict guidelines was conducted. Indexes of glycemic control, insulin requirements, body weight, blood pressure, plasma lipids, hypoglycemic events, and other adverse events were measured.
                Of the 390 subjects, 37 dropped out (12 in the placebo and 25 in the metformin group). Of those who completed 16 weeks of treatment, metformin use, as compared with placebo, was associated with improved glycemic control (mean daily glucose at 16 weeks 7.8 vs. 8.8 mmol/l, P = 0.006; mean GHb 6.9 vs. 7.6%, P < 0.0001); reduced insulin requirements (63.8 vs. 71.3 IU, P < 0.0001); reduced weight gain (-0.4 vs. +1.2 kg, P < 0.01); and decreased plasma LDL cholesterol (-0.21 vs. -0.02 mmol/l, P < 0.01). Risk of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS-In type 2 diabetic patients who are intensively treated with insulin, the combination of insulin and metformin results in superior glycemic control compared with insulin therapy alone, while insulin requirements and weight gain are less. Metformin is a key treatment option in type 2 diabetes. However, metformin may decrease vitamin B12 levels and increase levels of homocysteine, a cardiovascular risk factor. We investigated whether 16 weeks of treatment with metformin affects serum concentrations of homocysteine, folate and vitamin B12 in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin.
                Placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Measurements: at baseline and 16 weeks later.
                This trial was conducted in the outpatient clinics of three general hospitals in The Netherlands.
                A total of 745 patients with type 2 diabetes, treated with insulin and not known with a contraindication for the use of metformin, were approached; 390 gave informed consent and entered the study. Thirty-seven subjects dropped out (12 placebo and 25 metformin users).
                Addition of metformin or placebo to insulin therapy. PRIMARY OUTCOME PARAMETERS: Serum homocysteine, folate, vitamin B12, indices of glycaemic control and body weight.
                Amongst those who completed 16 weeks of treatment, metformin use, as compared with placebo, was associated with an increase in homocysteine of 4% (0.2 to 8; P=0.039) and with decreases in folate [-7% (-1.4 to -13); P=0.024] and vitamin B12 [-14% (-4.2 to -24); P<0.0001]. In addition, the increase in homocysteine could be explained by the decreases in folate and vitamin B12.
                In patients with type 2 diabetes, 16 weeks of treatment with metformin reduces levels of folate and vitamin B12, which results in a modest increase in homocysteine. The clinical significance of these findings remains to be investigated. Poorly controlled type II diabetic patients with hypomagnesaemia, hypermagnesuria, and hypercalciuria were allocated to treatment with either metformin or glipizide, to determine the effects on some indices of mineral metabolism. Despite comparable improvement in glycaemic control, assessed by glucose and haemoglobin A1, there were significant differences between the two groups in the handling of magnesium. Patients receiving metformin showed a reduction in magnesium excretion but remained hypomagnesaemic and hypercalciuric. In contrast, patients receiving glipizide exhibited little change in either magnesium or calcium excretion but showed a significant rise in serum magnesium. An estimated 25 million Indians currently have diabetes and the projections indicate Indians would be the largest group by the year 2025 AD. An open, phase III, multicentric study was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of the triple drug combination glimepiride 2 mg plus pioglitazone hydrochloride 15 mg plus metformin SR 500 mg for 8 weeks in 101 Indian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. The study revealed that the triple drug combination could achieve the recommended goals, recommended by American Diabetic Association, for fasting blood glucose < or = 140 mg/dl and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of < or = 8%. After 8 weeks, the mean fasting blood glucose (baseline 189.61) was reduced to 111.68 (41% reduction); the mean glycosylated haemoglobin (baseline 10.32) was significantly reduced to 7.54 (26% reduction). The triple drug combination significantly reduced the levels of triglyceride, low density lipoproteins and total cholesterol. These significant levels were achieved within 8 weeks and all patients tolerated the drug well with no reported case of serious adverse events including hypoglycaemia. There were also no reported drug interactions in the study. Since the decrease in HbA1c was continuous and throughout the study, a further decrease in the HbA1c levels would have been noted since the present trial was designed for a period of 8 weeks. Thus, the present study confirms the efficacy and safety of FDC of the triple drug combination in patients with type 2 diabetes. To test the effect of continuing metformin on weight gain and glycaemic control in patients with poorly controlled Type 2 diabetes who need to start insulin.
                Patients with Type 2 diabetes on maximum tolerated oral agents referred for insulin conversion were recruited from hospital diabetes clinics into a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial. The 183 participants received metformin or placebo, titrated up to 2 g a day or maximum tolerated dose, with insulin started according to local practice. The main outcome measures were weight change over 12 months, HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycaemia, treatment satisfaction, and well-being.
                Over 12 months, metformin was associated with less weight gain than placebo [mean 6.1 kg vs. 7.6 kg; adjusted difference 1.5 kg (95% confidence interval 0.2-2.9); P=0.02], a greater reduction in HbA1c[1.5% vs. 1.3%; adjusted difference 0.5% (0.1-0.9); P=0.02] and a lower insulin requirement [62 units vs. 86; adjusted difference 25 units (15-34); P<0.001], but also more hypoglycaemia [relative risk of any episode 1.24 (1.02-1.1); P=0.03]. Treatment satisfaction improved more in patients on metformin than on placebo (P<0.001), as did the positive well-being score (P=0.02).
                Metformin decreases weight gain, lowers insulin requirement, and improves glycaemic control, and should be continued in patients with Type 2 diabetes who transfer to insulin. The insulin and glucagon responses to arginine infusion were investigated in patients with maturity-onset diabetes under control conditions and during metformin therapy. Metformin did not significantly affect the insulin nor the glucagon response to arginine. These data support the concept that biguanide do not act directly on the islets of Langerhans. To compare the effect of add-on glimepiride or pioglitazone in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
                Multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, forcedtitration study involving 203 adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (A1C 7.5-10%) on metformin monotherapy. Subjects were randomized to receive glimepiride or pioglitazone, titrated to the maximum dose for 26 weeks. Subjects were evaluated for A1C changes, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin, C-peptide, and lipid levels. Safety outcomes and diabetes-related healthcare resource utilization were also evaluated.
                Both treatment groups achieved similar and significant mean decreases from baseline to endpoint (week 26) in A1C (p = 0.0001) and FPG (p < 0.05). Glimepiride therapy, however, resulted in a more rapid decline in A1C levels at weeks 6, 12, and 20 vs. pioglitazone (p < 0.05). A mean A1C < or = 7% was reached faster in the glimepiride group (median, 80-90 days vs. 140-150 days [p = 0.024]). Total and LDL cholesterol were significantly higher with pioglitazone treatment than with glimepiride at endpoint (p < 0.05). Glimepiride treatment was associated with an increased risk of hypoglycemia and pioglitazone with higher rate of peripheral edema. Healthcare resource utilization was similar between groups, but total healthcare costs were significantly lower for glimepiride versus pioglitazone over the course of the study, driven largely by drug costs. The use of fasting C-peptide concentration > or = 0.27 nmol/L in the inclusion criteria was a potential limitation as it may have included those patients with an improved probability for glimepiride or pioglitazone response. In addition, a larger patient population would have provided a greater degree of data applicability.
                In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, add-on glimepiride or pioglitazone results in similar overall improvements in glycemic control. Compared with pioglitazone, glimepiride is associated with faster glycemic control, lower total and LDL cholesterol levels and reduced short-term healthcare costs. Metformin and glibenclamide were compared in a randomized, double-blind trial in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) using a parallel group design. The study was performed in primary health care, and the main purpose was to assess combination therapy with the two drugs as primary treatment versus conventional oral therapy. After a 2 months diet period patients were randomized to commence treatment with either metformin, glibenclamide or the combination of both. Patients randomized to monotherapy received the alternative drug in addition if the maximal dose i.e. 3 g metformin or 14 mg glibenclamide was insufficient to normalize the fasting blood glucose concentration (FBG). Randomization and dose escalation occurred at FBG greater than or equal to 6.7 mmol/l. The titrated dose was continued for 6 months, whereafter placebo was given for 2 weeks. Seventy-two patients were randomized to either the metformin group (n = 38) or the glibenclamide group (n = 34). Fifty-six completed 6 months treatment, twenty-eight in each randomized group. Glycaemic control was unchanged after diet alone in all groups. The improvement during drug treatment was highly significant (p less than 0.001), mean FBG difference (+/- SEM) 3.2 +/- 0.4 mmol/l and mean HbA1c difference (+/- SEM) 1.5 +/- 0.2% (n = 56). There were no significant differences between patients treated solely with metformin (n = 16) and glibenclamide (n = 17) or between patients treated with a combination of glibenclamide added to metformin (n = 12) and metformin added to glibenclamide (n = 11).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Twenty-two NIDDM patients completed an open randomized cross-over study comparing metformin and glibenclamide over 1 year. The drugs had an equivalent effect on glycaemic control, but, in contrast to glibenclamide, metformin reduced body weight. Neither drug affected triglycerides, total- and LDL-cholesterol or C-peptide. Metformin caused a slight elevation of HDL-cholesterol (P less than 0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed. The results show that oral hypoglycaemic agents are not associated with undesirable effects on lipids and lipoproteins. To determine causes of weight gain during insulin therapy with and without metformin in Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus.
                Twenty-six patients with Type II diabetes (body mass index 28+/-1 kg/m2) were treated with insulin alone (n = 13) or insulin and with metformin (n = 13). Components of energy balance (basal metabolic rate, energy intake, glucosuria) were measured at 0 and 12 months.
                Glycaemic control improved similarly in patients using (HbA1c 10.5+/-0.3 vs 7.6+/-0.2%, p<0.001) and not using (10.2+/-0.3 vs 7.8+/-0.3%, p < 0.001) metformin. The metformin group required 47 % less insulin than the group not using metformin (p < 0.001). Body weight increased by 3.8+/-0.8 and 7.5+/-1.6 kg (p < 0.05), respectively. Basal metabolic rate and glucosuria were similar at 0 and 12 months in both groups but the metformin group decreased energy intake by 1.12+/-0.46 MJ/day, whereas it remained unchanged in the other group (0.15+/-0.42 MJ/day). Changes in body weight and glycaemia were statistically significant independent determinants of basal metabolic rate. Their change in opposite directions explained why basal metabolic rate remained unchanged.
                Improved glycaemia promotes weight gain by decreasing both basal metabolic rate and glucosuria. Use of metformin decreases weight gain by reducing energy intake and is therefore a useful adjunct to insulin therapy in patients with Type II diabetes. Patients with maturity onset diabetes that is poorly controlled on maximal doses of oral hypoglycaemic agents are difficult to treat. A prospective randomised crossover study was performed in 58 predominantly non-obese patients on maximal doses of glibenclamide or metformin, or both, to find out if insulin would improve control or well being. The patients were given daily injections of up to 48 units of highly purified porcine lente insulin. Glycaemic control was improved by 15% or more in only 18 patients; 14 others felt better but their diabetes was no better controlled. Those whose control was improved by insulin could not be distinguished by age, duration of diabetes, body mass index, or their own treatment preference. C peptide concentrations, however, did help predict the response to insulin, the fasting C peptide to glucose ratio being considerably lower in those patients whose control was better on insulin. These findings suggest that a simple insulin regimen does not necessarily lead to better glycaemic control in maturity onset diabetes. Nevertheless, a trial of insulin is often justified since it poses few practical difficulties and makes some patients feel better even if their control is not improved. A more complex regimen might improve control in more cases, but it might also be less acceptable to older patients. Platelet-rich plasma was prepared from 47 patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes treated with glibenclamide and metformin, and 21 controls. The release of radio-labelled 5-hydroxytryptamine in response to aggregating agents (adenosine diphosphate, adrenaline and sodium arachidonate), and the effects on release of a selective thromboxane inhibitor (UK-34787) were investigated. Subsequently, 20 of the diabetic subjects were chosen at random for treatment with insulin; the remainder continued to take tablets. Platelet studies were then repeated, in all patients, after 4 and 6 months. The results showed an association between platelet behaviour and the presence of vascular complications, and were consistent with previous observations of reduced platelet reactivity in patients taking sulphonylureas. There was no correlation of platelet reactivity with blood glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin or lipid levels. To quantify the effect of metformin on the metabolism of triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoprotein of intestinal origin in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who had responded to sulfonylurea but still had fasting hyperglycemia.
                Sixteen patients with NIDDM who had demonstrated a fall in fasting plasma glucose concentration > 2.2 mmol/l in response to glipizide treatment but continued to have fasting plasma glucose concentrations > 8.3 mmol/l were studied. Fasting glucose, GHb, lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were determined, and resistance to insulin-mediated glucose disposal was estimated by measuring the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration at the end of a 180-min infusion of somatostatin, glucose, and insulin. In addition, plasma glucose, insulin, and TG concentrations were measured at frequent intervals from 0800 to 2400, with patients eating breakfast at 0800 and lunch at 1200. Vitamin A was also given at lunch, and the retinyl ester content in plasma and in chylomicron (Svedberg flotation constant [Sf] > 400) and the chylomicron remnant (Sf 20-400) fractions were used to quantify the concentration of postprandial intestinal TG-rich lipoprotein from 1200 to 2400.
                Fasting plasma glucose concentrations (6.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 10.5 +/- 0.4 mmol/l), GHb levels (7.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 10.8 +/- 0.5%), and day-long plasma glucose concentrations were all significantly lower after metformin treatment (P < 0.001), which was associated with a significant (P < 0.001) fall in SSPG concentration (11.0 +/- 0.9 to 9.6 +/- 0.6 mmol/l). In addition, postprandial concentrations of glucose, insulin, free fatty acids, and TG were lower (P < 0.001) following metformin treatment. Postprandial retinyl ester concentrations were also lower in plasma by 33 +/- 5.7% (P < 0.001) and in both the chylomicron (32 +/- 7.2%, P < 0.001) and chylomicron remnant (26 +/- 7.0%, P < 0.005) fractions.
                Addition of metformin to sulfonylurea-treated patients with NIDDM with less than optimal glycemic control was associated with improved glycemic control, lower postprandial insulin and TG concentrations, and a decrease in postprandial concentration of TG-rich lipoproteins of intestinal origin. All of these changes might be expected to decrease risk of coronary heart disease. We previously reported that lipoprotein lipase mass levels in preheparin serum (preheparin LPL mass) was significantly lower in type 2 diabetes mellitus compared to healthy subjects and that low preheparin LPL mass may be a high-risk factor of coronary atherosclerosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of metformin on serum lipoprotein lipase mass levels (preheparin LPL mass), adiponectin and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Twenty-eight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbAlc>7.0%), who were already receiving sulfonylurea agents, took metformin 500 mg orally twice daily for 3 months. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), immunoreactive insulin (basal IRI) and HbAlc decreased significantly after metformin treatment. LDL-Rm ratio decreased significantly (from 0.3521+/-0.046 to 0.3339+/-0.030, P<0.05) and preheparin LPL mass increased significantly (from 42.5+/-3.2 to 50.6+/-3.5 ng/ml, P<0.0005), but adiponectin was unchanged. The correlation of a change of LDL-Rm ratio and a change of preheparin LPL mass showed a negative correlation tendency. The changes in LDL-Rm ratio and preheparin LPL mass were independent of the hypoglycemic effect of metformin. These results suggest that metformin may increase LPL production, thereby increasing LDL particle size. These effects might be independent of the hypoglycemic effect of metformin. The efficacy of thiazolidinediones, as compared with other oral glucose-lowering medications, in maintaining long-term glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is not known.
                We evaluated rosiglitazone, metformin, and glyburide as initial treatment for recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes in a double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial involving 4360 patients. The patients were treated for a median of 4.0 years. The primary outcome was the time to monotherapy failure, which was defined as a confirmed level of fasting plasma glucose of more than 180 mg per deciliter (10.0 mmol per liter), for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin or glyburide. Prespecified secondary outcomes were levels of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin, insulin sensitivity, and beta-cell function.
                Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a cumulative incidence of monotherapy failure at 5 years of 15% with rosiglitazone, 21% with metformin, and 34% with glyburide. This represents a risk reduction of 32% for rosiglitazone, as compared with metformin, and 63%, as compared with glyburide (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The difference in the durability of the treatment effect was greater between rosiglitazone and glyburide than between rosiglitazone and metformin. Glyburide was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular events (including congestive heart failure) than was rosiglitazone (P<0.05), and the risk associated with metformin was similar to that with rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone was associated with more weight gain and edema than either metformin or glyburide but with fewer gastrointestinal events than metformin and with less hypoglycemia than glyburide (P<0.001 for all comparisons).
                The potential risks and benefits, the profile of adverse events, and the costs of these three drugs should all be considered to help inform the choice of pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00279045 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
                Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nateglinide and metformin alone and in combination in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by diet, focusing on changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and mealtime glucose excursions.
                In this randomized double-blind study, patients with an HbA1c level between 6.8 and 11.0% during a 4-week placebo run-in received 24 weeks' treatment with 120 mg nateglinide before meals (n = 179), 500 mg metformin three times a day (n = 178), combination therapy (n = 172), or placebo (n = 172). HbA1c and FPG were evaluated regularly, and plasma glucose levels were determined after Sustacal challenge at weeks 0, 12, and 24. Hypoglycemia and other adverse events were recorded.
                At study end point, HbA1c was reduced from baseline with nateglinide and metformin but was increased with placebo (-0.5, -0.8, and +0.5%, respectively; P < or = 0.0001). Changes in FPG followed the same pattern (-0.7, -1.6, and +0.4 mmol/l; P < or = 0.0001). Combination therapy was additive (HbA1c -1.4% and FPG -2.4 mmol/l; P < or = 0.01 vs. monotherapy). After Sustacal challenge, there was a greater reduction in mealtime glucose with nateglinide monotherapy compared with metformin monotherapy or placebo (adjusted area under the curve [AUC]0-130 min -2.1, -1.1, and -0.6 mmol x h(-1) x l(-1); p < or = 0.0001). An even greater effect was observed with combination therapy (AUC0-130 min -2.5 mmol x h(-1) x l(-1); P < or = 0.0001 vs. metformin and placebo). All regimens were well tolerated.
                Nateglinide and metformin monotherapy each improved overall glycemic control but by different mechanisms. Nateglinide decreased mealtime glucose excursions, whereas metformin primarily affected FPG. In combination, nateglinide and metformin had complementary effects, improving HbA1c, FPG, and postprandial hyperglycemia. To investigate the effect of metformin on insulin receptor binding and diabetic control, eight obese type II diabetic patients were studied before treatment, after one and four weeks of taking metformin (500 mg thrice daily), and four weeks after withdrawal of the drug. After one and four weeks of treatment the number of erythrocyte insulin receptors had increased by 116% and 184% respectively. This was due almost entirely to an increase in the number of low affinity binding sites. The number of receptors was still raised four weeks after metformin had been withdrawn. Diabetic control as assessed by urinary glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1), and glucose tolerance values was significantly improved during metformin treatment, while plasma insulin concentrations were not altered. These results indicate that metformin produces a rapid and protracted increase in low affinity insulin receptors in type II diabetes, associated with greater insulin sensitivity and improved diabetic control. To examine the effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-4) inhibition on meal-related beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity over 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes.
                In a 12-week core study, placebo (n = 51) or vildagliptin (n = 56; 50 mg OD) was added to metformin treatment (1.5-3.0 mg/day). A 40-week extension followed in 71 patients. Meal tests were performed at 0, 12, 24, and 52 weeks; glucose, insulin, and C-peptide were evaluated.
                In subjects completing 52 weeks with participation in all meal tests (n = 57), HbA(1c) (A1C) decreased in the vildagliptin/metformin group (VM group, n = 31) but increased in the placebo/metformin group (PM group, n = 26; between-group difference -1.0 +/- 0.2%; P < 0.001; baseline of all subjects combined 7.7 +/- 0.1%). Also, fasting glucose decreased in the VM group but increased in the PM group (difference -0.9 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P = 0.016; baseline 9.8 +/- 0.3 mmol/l). Insulin secretion (postmeal suprabasal area under the 0- to 30-min C-peptide curve divided by the 30-min increase in glucose) was increased in the VM group but was reduced in the PM group (difference +0.011 +/- 0.03 pmol/l 30 min/mmol/l, P = 0.018; baseline 0.036 +/- 0.02). Insulin sensitivity during meal ingestion (oral glucose insulin sensitivity) increased in the VM group but was not altered in the PM group (difference +27 +/- 4 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), P = 0.036; baseline 246 +/- 6). Insulin secretion related to insulin sensitivity (adaptation index) increased in the VM group but decreased in the PM group (difference +3.2 +/- 1.0, P = 0.040; baseline 9.1 +/- 0.5). The change in adaptation index correlated to the change in A1C (r = -0.39, P = 0.004).
                This study presents evidence that DPP-4 inhibition by vildagliptin when added to metformin in type 2 diabetes over 52 weeks improves beta-cell function along with improved postmeal insulin sensitivity. To compare the effects of acarbose or metformin treatment used as an adjunct with a sulfonylurea agent in the treatment of NIDDM not adequately controlled with the use of a sulfonylurea agent alone.
                Of the poorly controlled female NIDDM patients on sulfonylurea treatment, 18 were randomly selected from the outpatient diabetic clinic for study. For 8 weeks, they received either acarbose (300 mg/daily) or metformin (1,500 mg/daily) in addition to sulfonylurea in a crossover design using a 3-week washout period between treatments. The efficacy of each drug regimen was assessed by measuring the levels of glycosylated hemoglobin, fasting and 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) levels, cholesterol, triglyceride, and fibrinogen levels before and after 8 weeks of therapy.
                The metabolic parameters measured before initiation of either treatment regimen were similar. Mean fasting and 2-h postprandial glucose levels were reduced moderately at the end of 8 weeks of both combination treatments (P < 0.05). Although the fasting and 2-h postprandial plasma insulin and C-peptide and fibrinogen levels at the end of the 8-week treatment periods were lower than those obtained at the beginning of the study, the differences between these values were not statistically significant. Cholesterol levels remained unchanged. Only the 2-h PPBG level in the group using acarbose plus a sulfonylurea was lower than the level achieved by the group using metformin plus a sulfonylurea (8.1 +/- 0.8 vs. 9.8 +/- 1.0 mmol/l, respectively, P < 0.05). The difference between pre- and posttreatment levels of the 2-h PPBG level in both arms of the study were statistically significant (delta-acarbose, 5.3 +/- 0.4 vs. delta-metformin, 2.9 +/- 0.3) (P < 0.05). Specific drug-associated side effects were observed in 12 patients on acarbose and 3 patients on metformin.
                Acarbose or metformin can be used as effective adjuvant therapies with a sulfonylurea agent in NIDDM patients who are poorly controlled with the sulfonylurea agent alone. Combination oral therapy is often used to control the hyperglycemia of patients with type 2 diabetes. We compared the effectiveness of metformin and troglitazone when added to sulfonylurea therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal blood glucose control.
                We used a randomized 2-group design to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of troglitazone and metformin for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled with diet and oral sulfonylureas. Thirty-two subjects were randomized to receive either troglitazone or metformin for 14 weeks, including a 2-week drug-titration period. The primary outcome variable was mean change in the level of glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included mean changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide levels, renal or metabolic side effects, and symptomatic tolerability.
                The addition of either troglitazone or metformin to oral sulfonylurea therapy significantly decreased Hb A1c levels. Both treatment regimens also significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose and C-peptide levels. We found no significant differences between the treatment arms in efficacy, metabolic side effects, or tolerability.
                Our results demonstrate that troglitazone and metformin each significantly improved Hb A1c, fasting plasma glucose, and C-peptide levels when added to oral sulfonylurea therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes who had inadequate glucose control. Injection of long-acting insulin at bedtime is a common therapeutic approach for patients with type 2 diabetes that is poorly controlled with oral regimens. Neutral protamine lispro (NPL) insulin has demonstrated better glycemic control and similar incidence of hypoglycemic events than that of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.
                To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bedtime NPL insulin or insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycemic control while receiving stable doses of metformin and sulfonylurea.
                Open-label, randomized trial.
                Teaching hospital (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Second University of Naples), Naples, Italy.
                116 adults receiving stable doses of metformin plus sulfonylurea for longer than 90 days with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels of 7.5% to 10% and fasting plasma glucose levels of 6.7 mmol/L or greater (> or =120 mg/dL).
                10 IU of NPL insulin or insulin glargine injected subcutaneously at bedtime with weekly dose titrations to target fasting glucose levels less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) in addition to stable oral regimens. Patients receiving nighttime sulfonylurea before the study were switched to metformin.
                The primary outcome was change in HbA(1c) levels from baseline to week 36. Secondary outcomes were HbA(1c) levels less than 7%, self-reported hypoglycemic episodes, insulin dose, self-monitored glucose level, and body weight. Twenty patients in each group had continuous glucose monitoring for 3 consecutive days before adding insulin and at week 36.
                Improvement in HbA(1c) levels was similar in both groups (1.83% and 1.89% for NPL and glargine, respectively). The difference between the groups was 0.06 percentage point (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.15 percentage points). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Hemoglobin A(1c) levels less than 7% occurred in 62% of patients receiving NPL and 64% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 2.0 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 5.0 percentage points]). Fasting plasma glucose levels less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) occurred in 40% of patients receiving NPL and 41% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 1.0 percentage point [CI, -0.9 to 3.0 percentage points]). Any hypoglycemic event occurred in 74% of patients receiving NPL and 67% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 7 percentage points [CI, -5 to 13 percentage points]). Continuous glucose level monitoring in the patients who had this measurement did not differ statistically.
                The study was not blinded, had limited power to detect differences in hypoglycemic events, and did not obtain continuous glucose level monitoring for all patients.
                Similar glycemic control occurred with the addition of NPL or glargine insulin to oral regimens in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Hypoglycemia was similar in the 2 groups, but sample size limited the ability to make a definite safety assessment. This study investigated the efficacy during daily practice of rosiglitazone (RSG) added to metformin (MET) in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two post-marketing observational studies were conducted in Germany over 6 months. RSG (4 mg/day titrated to 8 mg/day as required) was added to existing MET in 11,014 subjects. Subjects were maintained on diet and exercise. Addition of RSG to MET significantly reduced median HbA 1c by 1.3% (8.1 vs. 6.8%; p < 0.0001) and median fasting blood glucose (FBG) by 47.0 mg/dl (171.0 vs. 124.0 mg/dl; p < 0.0001) after 6 months. The proportion of subjects achieving HbA(1c) targets of < or = 6.5 and < or = 7.0% increased from 3.5 to 38.8% and from 13.5 to 63.7%, respectively. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased by 7 and 3 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.0001). Mean weight decreased by 1.7 kg and was constant or reduced in most (74.1%) subjects. Addition of RSG to MET significantly reduces median HbA 1c and FBG in clinical practice and is generally well tolerated. Obese patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance are at increased risk of development of cardiovascular diseases. Endothelial dysfunction may be a reason for development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular diseases. Lifestyle modification, increased physical activity, weight reduction, energy restricted diet and good glycaemia control can be useful for the endothelial function improvement and may decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of basal insulin analog and metformin on glycaemia control and weight as risk factors of endothelial dysfunction. Total of 15 patients (9 male and 6 female) with type 2 diabetes were studied. The patients were monitored over six months period. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), and body mass index (BMI) were observed. Mean age of the subjects was 53,4 +/- 6,27 years. Mean diabetes duration was 3,71 +/- 1,89 years. At the end of the study mean body mass index decreased from 27,5 +/- 1,45 kg/m2 to 25,7 +/-1,22 kg/m2. In this study we included diabetic patients with fasting glycaemia over 7 mmol/dm3, postmeal glycaemia over 7,8 mmol/dm3 and glycated hemoglobin over 7%. Prior to the study, the patients were treated with premix insulin divided in two daily doses and metformin after the lunch, which did not result in sufficient regulation of glycaemia. We started treatment with one daily insulin basal analog and three daily doses of metformin and monitored the above mentioned parameters. We advised patients to change their lifestyle, to practice energy restricted diet and to increase their daily physical activity. Insulin doses were titrated separately for each patient (0,7-1 IU/kg). Weight reduction was recorded after the study. Mean fasting glycaemia decreased from 8,6+/-0,49 mmol/dm3 to 7,04+/-0,19 mmol/dm3 (p < 0,05). Mean postmeal glycaemia decreased from 9,74 +/- 0,79 mmol/dm3 to 7,6 +/- 0,43 mmol/dm3 (p<0,05). Mean HbA1c decreased from 8,80 +/- 0,59 % to 7,11 +/- 0,22 % (p<0,05). Treatment with one daily doses of basal insulin analog and three daily doses of metformin with lifestyle modification and weight reduction, in obese patients with type 2 diabetes can be useful for the endothelial function improvement and may decrease the risk of cardiovascular diseases. Although some studies have suggested a direct action of troglitazone on vascular cells, its effects on diabetic vascular diseases have not been reported. We therefore investigated the effect of troglitazone on microalbuminuria in patients with incipient diabetic nephropathy.
                A total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes associated with microalbuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio [ACR] [milligrams per gram creatinine] ranging from 30 to 300 mg/g creatinine) were studied. They were randomly divided into two groups: patients treated with metformin (500 mg/day, n = 13) or with troglitazone (400 mg/day, n = 17) for 12 weeks. ACR, lipid profile, blood pressure, glycated hemoglobin, and plasma glucose during meal-load tests were measured every 4 weeks.
                Anthropometric indices (BMI and percent fat), lipid profile, and blood pressure did not change with either treatment. Fasting and postmeal glucose levels decreased similarly in the two groups. Decrements in glycated hemoglobin were greater in the metformin group at 4 and 8 weeks after the initiation of treatment (P < 0.05). Troglitazone reduced ACR (median [25-75th percentiles]) from 70 (49-195) to 40 (31-90) mg/g creatinine at 4 weeks (P = 0.021) and maintained these reduced levels throughout the treatment period (8 weeks: 35 [26-68], P = 0.007; 12 weeks: 43 [26-103], P = 0.047). Metformin did not change ACR throughout the 12 weeks.
                Troglitazone ameliorated microalbuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. Furthermore, our findings suggest that troglitazone has some effects on vascular cells other than lowering plasma glucose levels. Troglitazone might be useful for diabetic angiopathy, including nephropathy and coronary artery disease.
There is no evidence from prospective comparative trials or from observational cohort studies that metformin is associated with an increased risk of lactic acidosis, or with increased levels of lactate, compared to other anti-hyperglycemic treatments.