Family-focused treatment versus individual treatment for bipolar disorder: results of a randomized clinical trial. Effects of psychoeducational intervention for married patients with bipolar disorder and their spouses. A randomized clinical trial of inpatient family intervention. V. Results for affective disorders. A randomized study of family-focused psychoeducation and pharmacotherapy in the outpatient management of bipolar disorder. Psychoeducation of partners of bipolar-manic patients. Does adjunctive family therapy enhance recovery from bipolar I mood episodes? Impact of a psychoeducational family intervention on caregivers of stabilized bipolar patients.
Recently hospitalized bipolar, manic patients (N = 53) were randomly assigned to a 9-month, manual-based, family-focused psychoeducational therapy (n = 28) or to an individually focused patient treatment (n = 25). All patients received concurrent treatment with mood-stabilizing medications. Structured follow-up assessments were conducted at 3-month intervals for a 1-year period ofactive treatment and a 1-year period of posttreatment follow-up. Compared with patients in individual therapy, those in family-focused treatment were less likely to be rehospitalized during the 2-year study period. Patients in family treatment also experienced fewer mood disorder relapses over the 2 years, although they did not differ from patients in individual treatment in their likelihood of a first relapse. Results suggest that family psychoeducational treatment is a useful adjunct to pharmacotherapy in decreasing the risk of relapse and hospitalization frequently associated with bipolar disorder. The relative benefit of adding a structured psychoeducational intervention to standard medication treatment for married patients with bipolar disorder and their spouses was assessed. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either medication management or medication management plus a marital intervention with their spouses for an 11-month period. Patients' symptoms, functioning, and adherence to their medication regimens were measured at study entry and at 11 months. Significant effects favoring the combined treatments were observed for overall patient functioning but not for symptom levels. The marital intervention was associated with improved medication adherence. Combined psychosocial and medication treatment does not affect patients' symptom levels beyond the effects of medication alone, but it does result in significant incremental gains in overall patient functioning. This paper reports the results at follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of combining family intervention with drug treatment during hospitalization for patients with affective disorder. The results suggest that female bipolar patients and their families benefited from family intervention, whereas unipolar patients and families did not. Patient outcome was positively correlated with the achievement of the goals of family intervention. Bipolar patients are at risk for relapses of their illness even when undergoing optimal pharmacotherapy. This study was performed to determine whether combining family-focused therapy (FFT) with pharmacotherapy during a postepisode interval enhances patients' mood stability during maintenance treatment.
                In a randomized controlled trial, 101 bipolar patients were assigned to FFT and pharmacotherapy or a less intensive crisis management (CM) intervention and pharmacotherapy. Outcome assessments were conducted every 3 to 6 months for 2 years. Participants (mean +/- SD age, 35.6 +/- 10.2 years) were referred from inpatient or outpatient clinics after onset of a manic, mixed, or depressed episode. FFT consisted of 21 sessions of psychoeducation, communication training, and problem-solving skills training. Crisis management consisted of 2 sessions of family education plus crisis intervention sessions as needed. Both protocols lasted 9 months. Patients received pharmacotherapy for 2 study years. Main outcome measures included time to relapse, depressive and manic symptoms, and medication adherence.
                Rates of study completion did not differ across the FFT (22/31, 71%) and CM groups (43/70, 61%). Patients undergoing FFT had fewer relapses (11/31, 35%) and longer survival intervals (mean +/- SD, 73.5 +/- 28.8 weeks) than patients undergoing CM (38/70, 54%; mean +/- SD, 53.2 +/- 39.6 weeks; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.75; P =.003; intent to treat). Patients undergoing FFT showed greater reductions in mood disorder symptoms and better medication adherence during the 2 years than patients undergoing CM.
                Combining family psychoeducation with pharmacotherapy enhances the postepisode symptomatic adjustment and drug adherence of bipolar patients. The partners of 14 bipolar-manic patients attending psychoeducation sessions were compared with 12 controls. After the sessions and 6 months later they showed more knowledge of the disease, medication and social strategies. Patient compliance did not change over the next year. The risk of this procedure is the initially increased level of anxiety of the patients. Family therapy is sometimes used as adjunctive treatment to pharmacotherapy to help patients recover from mood episodes of bipolar I disorder. However, the efficacy of this practice is not known.
                Ninety-two patients meeting criteria for a current bipolar I mood episode were randomly assigned to family therapy plus pharmacotherapy, multifamily psychoeducational group therapy plus pharmacotherapy, or pharmacotherapy alone. Time to recovery was analyzed with survival analysis.
                The proportion of subjects within each treatment group who recovered did not significantly differ, nor did time to recovery.
                The analyses did not include other outcomes such as psychosocial functioning, prophylaxis against recurrences of mood episodes, or compliance with pharmacotherapy.
                Neither adjunctive family therapy nor adjunctive multifamily psychoeducational group therapy significantly improves the rate of recovery from mood episodes of bipolar I disorder, compared to treatment with pharmacotherapy alone. Environmental stress has an important role in the course of bipolar disorder. Some findings have shown that family beliefs about the illness could predict family burden, and this burden could influence the outcome of bipolar disorder. To the best of our knowledge, there is scant information about the effects of family intervention on the caregiver's burden in bipolar disorder. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of psychoeducational family intervention on bipolar patients' caregivers, including the assessment of the caregiver's burden.
                45 medicated euthymic bipolar outpatients were randomized into an experimental and a control group. Relatives of patients from the experimental group received 12 psychoeducational, 90-min sessions about bipolar disorder and coping skills. The caregivers' knowledge of bipolar disorder, the relationship subscales of the Family Environment Scale, and the family burden subscales from an adapted version of the Social Behavior Assessment Schedule were assessed for both caregiver groups before and after the intervention.
                Psycho-educated caregivers significantly improved their knowledge of bipolar disorder and reduced both the subjective burden and the caregiver's belief about the link between the objective burden and the patient. No significant differences were found in the objective burden nor in the family relationship subscales.
                These preliminary results suggest that psychoeducational intervention on caregivers of bipolar patients may improve the caregiver's knowledge of the illness, reduce their distress or subjective burden and alter their beliefs about the link between the disruptions in their life and the patient's illness.
To date there is only a small and heterogeneous body of evidence on the effectiveness of family oriented approaches for bipolar disorder, and it is not yet possible to draw any definite conclusions to support their use as an adjunctive treatment for bipolar disorder. Further well designed RCTs should be a research priority.