Pulmicort Turbohaler once daily as initial prophylactic therapy for asthma. Bronchial reactivity in asthmatic children at high and low altitude. Effect of budesonide. Relative effects of inhaled corticosteroids on immunopathology and physiology in asthma: a controlled study. Short-term knemometry and urine cortisol excretion in children treated with fluticasone propionate and budesonide: a dose response study. Effect of inhalation of corticosteroids on exercise induced asthma: randomised double blind crossover study of budesonide in asthmatic children. Effect of budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness and pulmonary function in patients with mild to moderate asthma. Effects of reducing or discontinuing inhaled budesonide in patients with mild asthma. Rebound airway obstruction and responsiveness after cessation of terbutaline: effects of budesonide. An inhaled steroid improves markers of airway inflammation in patients with mild asthma. Short-term treatment of asthma with budesonide versus placebo. Effect of long-term treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid (budesonide) on airway hyperresponsiveness and clinical asthma in nonsteroid-dependent asthmatics. Effects of inhaled budesonide on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation. Greater effect of inhaled budesonide on adenosine 5'-monophosphate-induced than on sodium-metabisulfite-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma. The effect of inhaled budesonide on the diurnal variation in airway mechanics, airway responsiveness and serum neutrophil chemotactic activity in Asian patients with predominant nocturnal asthma. Controlled trial of budesonide given by the nebuhaler in preschool children with asthma. Effect of inhaled budesonide on seasonal changes in sensitivity and maximal response to methacholine in pollen-sensitive asthmatic subjects. Short-term effects of budesonide, nedocromil sodium and salmeterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in childhood asthma. The effect of two months of treatment with inhaled budesonide on bronchial responsiveness to histamine and house-dust mite antigen in asthmatic children. Dose-related efficacy of budesonide administered via a dry powder inhaler in the treatment of children with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Interaction of inhaled beta 2 agonist and inhaled corticosteroid on airway responsiveness to allergen and methacholine. Action of budesonide on asthmatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Effects on directly and indirectly acting bronchoconstrictors. Effect of 1 year daily treatment with 400 microg budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in newly diagnosed asthmatics. Use of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with mild asthma. Effect of inhaled corticosteroids on bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with mild asthma. Budesonide delivered by Turbuhaler is effective in a dose-dependent fashion when used in the treatment of adult patients with chronic asthma. Time course of change in bronchial reactivity with an inhaled corticosteroid in asthma. Effect of regular terbutaline and budesonide on bronchial reactivity to allergen challenge. Hypodense eosinophil number relates to clinical severity, airway hyperresponsiveness and response to inhaled corticosteroids in asthmatic subjects. Short-term growth and collagen turnover in asthmatic adolescents treated with the inhaled glucocorticoid budesonide. Oral glucocorticosteroid-sparing effect of budesonide administered by Turbuhaler: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adults with moderate-to-severe chronic asthma. Pulmicort Turbuhaler Study Group. Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids. Comparison of 3 different doses of budesonide and placebo on the early asthmatic response to inhaled allergen. An inhaled glucocorticoid does not prevent tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of a long-acting inhaled beta 2-agonist. Inhaled glucocorticoids decrease nitric oxide in exhaled air of asthmatic patients. Effects of budesonide and bambuterol on circadian variation of airway responsiveness and nocturnal symptoms of asthma. Inhaled budesonide reduces lung hyperinflation in children with asthma. The effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the maximal degree of airway narrowing to methacholine in asthmatic subjects. A study of the mechanism of the antiasthmatic action of inhaled budesonide.
In a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, 340 asthmatic patients aged 12-70 years received budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the morning, budesonide 400 micrograms once daily in the evening, budesonide 200 micrograms twice daily or placebo, for 12 weeks in addition to inhaled short-acting beta 2-agonists used as required (p.r.n.). Budesonide was given as Pulmicort Turbohaler. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) increased by 20 to 30 1 min-1 in each of the active treatment groups, significantly more than in the placebo group (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the active treatment groups. Symptom improvement and decreased beta 2-agonist use reflected the PEFR data. Incidences of adverse events in the active treatment groups were similar to those observed in the placebo group. Budesonide 400 micrograms given once daily morning or evening is equieffective with the same total daily dose given twice daily in the treatment of mild to moderate stable asthmatics. Inhaled steroids may control bronchial inflammation in asthmatics exposed to allergens. In this study we evaluated whether prophylactic budesonide would prevent relapse of asthma in children re-exposed to offending allergens at sea level, after a period of antigen avoidance at high altitude. Thirty children received either budesonide (200 micrograms b.i.d.) or placebo (double-blind). Following a 4-wk baseline period and 2 wk of treatment at high altitude, children were treated for 3 mo at sea level. Methacholine challenge and pulmonary function studies were performed before and after baseline period, after the 2 wk of treatment in the mountain environment, and at the end of treatment. ECP serum levels were evaluated after the baseline period and at the end of treatment. PEFR and symptoms were recorded in a diary card during the study. The increase in methacholine provocative dosage was greater, although not significant (p = 0.096), in the budesonide than in the placebo group after the treatment at high altitude and remained higher at the end of the treatment (p = 0.04). ECP levels increased in both the groups with no significant difference. Our results confirm that budesonide, in addition to its efficacy in treating pre-existent airway inflammation, is effective in preventing the increase of reactivity in asthmatic children re-exposed to allergens. Although corticosteroids are recognised as the most efficacious treatment for bronchial asthma, their mode of action remains unclear. A placebo controlled trial was undertaken of the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on physiological and immmunopathological parameters in asthmatic patients in whom the correlations between these indices were tested after treatment.
                Sixteen patients (two women) with asthma entered a double blind, placebo controlled, parallel study during which they inhaled either budesonide 800 micrograms twice daily or matching placebo for six weeks. Spirometric parameters and bronchial reactivity to histamine and terbutaline were measured and endobronchial biopsy samples were taken before and after treatment. Patients recorded morning and evening flow rates during the treatment period. The biopsy samples were subjected to immunohistological analysis to determine the disposition of inflammatory cells within the bronchial wall.
                Treatment with budesonide resulted in a significant improvement in the 25-75% forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75) from a mean of 133 l/min before treatment to 169 l/min after treatment, and in the morning peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) from a mean of 384 l/min before treatment to 415 l/min after treatment. No changes were seen in the placebo group. Comparison between the changes in the immunopathological indices after six weeks of treatment with placebo or budesonide showed a significant reduction in the numbers of mast cells (0.5/unit area to 0.2/ unit area), activated eosinophils, and the expression of HLA-DR antigens (relative density -1.9 before to 1.02 after treatment) on inflammatory cells in response to treatment with budesonide. Although reductions in the numbers of other inflammatory cells within the bronchial wall were recorded using immunohistological analysis, these changes were not statistically significant. Significant correlations were found between changing immunological indices and lung physiology.
                This controlled study shows that inhaled corticosteroids cause improvement in physiological and immunopathological parameters in patients with stable asthma that are not seen with placebo, and that cause and effect relationships may exist between these two measures of disease status. Few thorough comparisons of the systemic effects of inhaled corticosteroids in children are available. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of budesonide and fluticasone propionate on short-term lower leg growth. Fluticasone propionate, budesonide and placebo were administered for 2 weeks in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, cross-over design. Twenty four children aged 6-12 yrs received 200 microg x day(-1) of each drug, or placebo. Another 24 children aged 6-12 years received 400 microg x day(-1) of each drug, or placebo. Dry powder inhalers were used. Lower leg length was measured by knemometry twice a week during all three treatment periods, and 24 h cortisol excretion in the urine was measured at the end of each period. In the low-dose group, lower leg growth rate was the same during treatment with placebo (0.35 mm x week(-1)), fluticasone propionate (0.38 mm x week(-1)) or budesonide (0.26 mm x week(-1)). No significant difference (p=0.39) in lower leg growth rate was found between treatment with 400 microg x day(-1) budesonide (0.30 mm x week(-1)) and 400 microg fluticasone propionate treatment (0.37 mm x week(-1)). Growth rate during treatment with budesonide, 400 microg x day(-1), was significantly lower than during placebo treatment (0.52 mm x week(-1)). Cortisol excretion in the urine during treatment with 200 microg x day(-1) fluticasone propionate was significantly reduced as compared with placebo (p=0.006), but not when compared with 200 microg x day(-1) budesonide (p=0.07). Budesonide 200 microg x day(-1) was not significantly different from placebo. Fluticasone propionate and budesonide, both at 400 microg x day(-1), resulted in a significant reduction in cortisol excretion in the urine as compared with placebo (p=0.001). It is concluded that, dose-for-dose, budesonide Turbuhaler and fluticasone propionate Diskhaler have similar systemic effects. nan Thirty-nine subjects were included in this double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in patients with mild to moderate asthma. The time-courses of change of FEV1, PEFR%, bronchial reactivity, and daily measures of asthma control were determined during 8 weeks of treatment after a run-in period of 2 weeks. Bronchial hyperresponsiveness was assessed by the methacholine provocation method, defined as the dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall of FEV1 compared with baseline values. The trends of FEV1 and the percentage change in PEFR from baseline were significantly different between groups, in favor of budesonide (P < .05). Patient assessments of the effect of treatment showed that PEF improved significantly in the budesonide group only. The budesonide group increased their tolerability for methacholine provocation by 1.8 DD (doubling dose), which tended to be higher compared with the 0.8 DD of the placebo group. It is evident from this study and previous studies that more data are needed to establish the dose-effect relationship with time and severity of the disease. In a previous study, we found that two years of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid, budesonide, was more effective than treatment with an inhaled beta 2-agonist, terbutaline, in patients with newly diagnosed, generally mild asthma. We continued this study for a third year to investigate whether the steroid dose could be reduced or discontinued and what effect crossover of patients from beta 2-agonist therapy to corticosteroid therapy would have.
                A total of 37 patients treated for two years with inhaled budesonide at a dose of 1200 micrograms per day were randomly assigned to treatment with 400 micrograms of budesonide per day (19 patients) or placebo (18 patients) in a double-blind manner. Another 37 patients, who had received terbutaline during the first two years, were crossed over in an open-label manner to treatment with 1200 micrograms of budesonide per day during the third year.
                Treatment with the reduced dose of budesonide was sufficiently effective in 74 percent of the patients to maintain bronchial responsiveness at a level similar to that achieved with the higher dose. In contrast, improvement was maintained in only 33 percent of the patients receiving placebo, and the differences in pulmonary function between the steroid and placebo groups were significant (for forced expiratory volume in one second, P = 0.007; for bronchial responsiveness to histamine, P = 0.025; and for peak expiratory flow in the morning, P = 0.040). The condition of patients who were crossed over from terbutaline therapy to treatment with 1200 micrograms of budesonide per day improved. However, the degree of improvement in these patients appeared to be less than in those who were treated with budesonide at the beginning of the three-year study.
                Early treatment with inhaled budesonide results in long-lasting control of mild asthma. Maintenance therapy can usually be given at a reduced dose, but discontinuation of treatment is often accompanied by exacerbation of the disease. Regular monotherapy with inhaled beta 2-agonists may lead to a temporary increase of airway obstruction and increase of airway responsiveness after cessation of treatment. We investigated whether anti-inflammatory therapy may affect these rebound phenomena. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we assessed lung function (FEV1) and airway responsiveness (PC20 methacholine [PC20]) during and after cessation of 2 wk of regular treatment with placebo and low-dose (250 micrograms) and high-dose (1,000 micrograms) inhaled terbutaline three times daily. Patients with mild allergic asthma (means [+/- SD] age of 28.2 +/- 6.6 yr, mean FEV1% of 91.9 +/- 14.6%, and geometric mean PC20 of 0.25 mg/ml) were studied. One group (n = 16) was randomized to budesonide treatment, 400 micrograms three times daily; the other group (n = 14) to placebo. PC20 and FEV1 were measured 10, 14, 34, and 82 h after the last terbutaline or placebo inhalation. A different method of statistical analysis was used, in that measurements performed at 10, 14, and 34 h were expressed relative to 82 h values in each period as an area-under-the-curve (AUC) value. FEV1 did not significantly change during placebo and budesonide treatment. Mean PC20 and morning and evening peak expiratory flow were significantly higher during budesonide treatment (p < 0.01). PC20 did not significantly change after cessation of terbutaline treatment in both placebo and budesonide treatment groups. AUC-FEV1 values after cessation of treatment with both doses of terbutaline were significantly different from the 82 h values (p < 0.05). The decrease in FEV1 was significantly greater after the last terbutaline and placebo inhalation in the placebo group compared with the budesonide treatment group (p = 0.02). We conclude that cessation of regular treatment after 2 wk with both low-dose and high-dose inhaled terbutaline does not result in a significant rebound airway responsiveness in patients with mild asthma. However, the results suggest a small rebound bronchoconstriction that does not occur when asthmatic patients are also treated with budesonide. Airway inflammation can be demonstrated in mildly asthmatic patients who are not treated with inhaled steroids. Current guidelines recommend that inhaled steroids should be introduced in mild asthmatics who use an inhaled beta2-agonist more than once daily. It was postulated that inhaled steroids can have anti-inflammatory effects in patients with even milder disease. The effect of 4 weeks of treatment with budesonide (800 microg twice daily by Turbohaler) was studied in 10 steroid-naive mildly asthmatic patients (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) = 96+/-1.4% predicted) who required an inhaled beta2-agonist less than one puff daily, in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover fashion. Spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), bronchial responsiveness (provocative concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20)), and sputum induction were performed before and after each treatment period. Following budesonide treatment, there were significant improvements in FEV1, and PC20, in association with a significant reduction in the percentage of eosinophils in induced sputum. Exhaled NO levels tended towards reduction, but the change was nonsignificant. There were also nonsignificant reductions in sputum eosinophil cationic protein and tumour necrosis factor-alpha levels. In conclusion inhaled budesonide can lead to improvements in noninvasive markers of airway inflammation, in association with a small improvement in lung function, even in mildly asthmatic patients who require an inhaled beta2-agonist less than once daily. This suggests a potential benefit of inhaled corticosteroids, even in relatively asymptomatic asthma. The effects of the topical steroid budesonide on bronchial hyperreactivity were evaluated in a patient group (A, n = 17) and a placebo-controlled patient group (B, n = 11). Group A was given budesonide 400 micrograms/12 h for 4 weeks and 200 micrograms/12 h for four more weeks. The drug proved efficient in controlling asthma clinically and improving the spirometric parameters: FVC (p < 0.05), FEF50 (p < 0.05) and FEV1 (p < 0.01). Bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20) decreased moderately in the treatment group (p < 0.1). On the contrary, basal spirometry and PD20 worsened in the control group. Some patients in group A showed peripheric eosinophilia (2/15) or in secretions (9/15), which persisted in one patient at end of treatment. Budesonide was effective in the clinical and spirometric control of asthma. We conclude that for a better assessment of the treatment of bronchial hyperreactivity with budesonide, the drug must be administered for a longer period of time. The differences between this study and previous ones is that the improvement in PD20 can be explained by the different characteristics of the patients selected for this study. Several short-term studies have shown that inhaled steroids can reduce airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma. To evaluate whether prolonged treatment can bring about full recovery, this double-blind, randomized, controlled trial examined the effect of budesonide, 400 micrograms daily for 1 yr, on airway hyperresponsiveness. The time course and characteristics of improvements and associated changes in clinical asthma severity were also evaluated. Thirty-two stable adult asthmatics, requiring bronchodilators alone, were selected. Before and monthly throughout the study, airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured and clinical asthma severity assessed by questionnaire, daily bronchodilator use, and number of asthma exacerbations. Patients receiving budesonide showed a fourfold mean improvement in airway responsiveness compared with those receiving placebo (p less than 0.0005), whose responsiveness remained very stable. Fifteen of the 16 budesonide subjects improved and 5 returned to the normal range. Largest improvements occurred during the first 3 months but, in some, were still progressing slowly at 1 yr. Improvements in responsiveness were accompanied by significant improvements in asthma symptoms, bronchodilator use, and number of asthma exacerbations. The results show that regular, prolonged use of inhaled steroid can produce marked improvements in airway hyperresponsiveness, sometimes with full resolution, and these improvements are accompanied by clinically significant improvements in clinical asthma. Allergen inhalation by sensitized subjects results in acute bronchoconstriction, which can be followed by a later bronchoconstrictor response, allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness, and increases in airway inflammatory cells. Treatment with inhaled glucocorticosteroids attenuates allergen-induced asthmatic airway responses. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a 1-wk pretreatment with inhaled budesonide influences allergen-induced changes in inflammatory cells in blood and induced sputum. Seven subjects with mild atopic asthma were treated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover fashion with either inhaled budesonide 400 microg/d, or placebo for 7 d. Allergen challenges were carried out the morning after treatment was discontinued and sputum samples were obtained 7 h after allergen inhalation. Methacholine airway responsiveness was measured, and blood and sputum samples were obtained 24 h post-allergen. Budesonide treatment attenuated the magnitude of both the early and the late asthmatic response, reduced allergen-induced methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness, and attenuated allergen-induced increases in total eosinophils and activated eosinophils. These results suggest that the effects of inhaled glucocorticosteroids on allergen-induced airway responses may be mediated through their inhibition of allergen-induced eosinophil migration and activation. Inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS) decrease airway responsiveness (AR) in asthma by mechanisms that may involve suppressing airway inflammation and a reduction in the number of inflammatory cells in the airways. To investigate the functional response to a reduction in airway inflammatory cells in asthma, we studied the effects of inhaled budesonide on AR to three different bronchial challenges, adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP), which primarily activates mast cells; methacholine (MCh), a direct stimulus, and sodium metabisulfite (MBS), a neural stimulus. In a double-blind randomized crossover manner, with a washout period of 28 days, 12 subjects with mild asthma underwent inhalation challenge with doubling increments of MCh, MBS, and AMP before and after 14 days of treatment with budesonide 0.8 mg twice daily from a multidose dry-powder delivery system (Turbohaler) or matched placebo. Treatment with budesonide reduced AR to MCh and MBS to a similar degree, displacing the dose-response curve of each agonist to the right by 1.17 (95% confidence intervals, 0.34 to 2.00) and 1.06 (0.34 to 1.78) doubling dilutions, respectively, when compared with placebo (p less than 0.01). Budesonide caused an additional and significantly greater reduction in AR to AMP, displacing the dose-response curve to the right by 2.92 (2.12 to 3.72) doubling dilutions when compared with placebo (p less than 0.001) and to the other challenges (p less than 0.01). We conclude that budesonide reduces AR to MCh and MBS by an action common to the effects of both direct and neural stimuli on airway smooth muscle contraction. The greater reduction in AR to AMP suggests that budesonide may have an additional action by reducing airway mast cell numbers and/or function. The effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in the control of daytime symptoms in asthma is well established, but the specific use against nocturnal asthma has not been systematically studied in Asian patients. This study examined the effect of treatment with inhaled budesonide on the nocturnal variation in measurements of airway calibre, bronchial hyperresponsiveness to inhaled histamine and circulating neutrophil chemotactic activity in Asian patients with nocturnal asthma. Thirty patients, with nocturnal asthma, were randomized into a 2-month, double-blind, parallel group study. Twice as many subjects were allocated to the group who received two consecutive months of inhaled budesonide 1600 microg daily as to the group who received placebo followed by budesonide. Spirometry, lung mechanics, bronchial hyperresponsiveness and serum neutrophil chemotactic factor (NCA) were measured at 16.00 h, 22.00 h and at 04.00 h on 3 days and nights, 4 weeks apart before and after either placebo or budesonide. The combined measurements for the two groups at 04.00 h before and after treatment with budesonide were: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) mean (SEM) litres 1.34 (0.17) before, 2.00 (0.19) after; thoracic gas volume (TGV) litres 3.05 (0.32) before, 2.25 (0.14) after; specific airway conductance (sGaw) (cmH20.0 sec)(-1) 0.39 (0.07) before, 1.16 (0.17) after; PD20 microg geometric mean 1.16 before, 44.74 after; neutrophil chemotactic activity (NCA) in units of graduations of migration 98.8 (4.2) before, 101 (14.2) after. The data showed that short and intermediate term high dose inhaled budesonide is an effective specific treatment for nocturnal asthma in Asian patients, resulting in marked improvements in symptoms and in lung mechanics, and reductions in the diurnal variations in bronchial hyperresponsiveness, before any change could be demonstrated in a circulating marker of airway inflammation. To determine whether the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide, given by a Nebuhaler spacing device, was effective in prophylaxis of asthma in preschool children.
                Double blind, placebo controlled, random order crossover trial with two week practice run in period.
                Outpatient clinic referrals in secondary referral centre.
                39 children aged 2-6 years selected for the following: able to use Nebuhaler; parents able to complete record card; poorly controlled asthma (defined); not already on systemic or inhaled steroids. Eleven withdrew for various reasons not connected with intolerance to budesonide. Age, sex, other atopies, and symptoms during run in period were similar in the 28 children who completed the trial and in the 11 who withdrew.
                Budesonide 200 micrograms or placebo (both one puff) given twice daily during 6-week treatment or control periods, using Nebuhaler after prior training. Three week "washout" at crossover. Compliance monitored by weighing canisters. Patients withdrawn if their acute attacks required treatment with systemic steroids.
                Control of asthma.
                Peak expiratory flow rate measured twice daily where cooperation allowed. Diary of symptoms and concomitant drug use kept daily. Results showed mean peak flow significantly higher (12% in mornings, 14% in evenings) in second three weeks of intervention compared with control period (95% confidence intervals 6.3-17.3% and 7.2-21.0%). Supplementary bronchodilator drugs reduced by 50% during intervention periods.
                Budesonide given by Nebuhaler is effective prophylaxis for preschool children with frequent asthma. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of inhaled budesonide on modifications of the provocative concentration of agonist causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20) and maximal response plateau to inhaled methacholine during the pollen season in pollen-sensitive subjects with mild asthma. The effects of inhaled budesonide (800 micrograms.day-1) on the threshold value (PC20) and maximal response plateau to inhaled methacholine were studied in 28 pollen-sensitive subjects with mild asthma during a pollen season in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel fashion. They were challenged with methacholine (up to 200 mg.ml-1) in February (preseasonal assessment) and during the middle of the pollen season (in May and again in June). Subjects treated with budesonide (n = 13) were protected from the decrease in PC20 seen in the placebo (n = 15) group (geometric mean PC20 placebo group: preseasonal = 8.51, May = 2.19 and June = 1.78 mg.ml-1; budesonide group: preseasonal = 3.71, May = 3.23 and June = 2.40 mg.ml-1; intergroup differences in doubling concentrations, p < 0.05). Among 10 subjects in the placebo group who reached plateau during the preseasonal assessment, seven lost the plateau in May and six in June. In the budesonide group, among seven subjects who reached plateau during the preseasonal assessment, three lost the plateau in May and four in June. Between-group differences were not significant. We conclude that in pollen-sensitive subjects with mild asthma, inhaled budesonide blocks the effects of natural allergen exposure on the methacholine threshold value.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The effects of budesonide, nedocromil sodium and salmeterol on bronchial hyperresponsiveness were determined over a period of 3 weeks.
                Forty-three asymptomatic children (22 male, 21 female, aged 7-17 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma were evaluated. The study was placebo-controlled and double-blind. At the beginning the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was measured and a methacholine challenge was performed to determine PC20 (provocative concentration of inhaled methacholine required to reduce FEV1 by 20%). The patients in group I (n = 12), group II (n = 10), group III (n = 11), and group IV (n = 10) inhaled 200 micrograms of budesonide, 2 mg of nedocromil sodium, 25 micrograms of salmeterol and a placebo, respectively, twice a day over the period of 3 weeks. Then the methacholine PC20 values of all patients were measured again and the results were compared statistically with their previous values.
                The statistical data revealed that the methacholine doses in PC20 before and after treatment were different in group I (P < 0.01). However, these differences were not statistically significant in the other groups (P > 0.05).
                The short term usage of budesonide decreases bronchial hyperresponsiveness, but nedocromil sodium and salmeterol in the given dises do not affect bronchial hyperresponsiveness. We studied the effect of 2 months of treatment with budesonide (BUD) (Pulmicort), an inhaled corticosteroid, on the bronchial hyperresponsiveness to house-dust mite antigen (BHR-HDM) and to histamine (BHR-H). We also investigated whether BUD started 20 to 24 h after the development of a late asthmatic reaction (LAR) would influence the antigen-induced increase in nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to BHR-H. Thirty-one children with mild asthma who were atopic to HDM were randomized double blind into two parallel groups. Fifteen patients inhaled 0.2 mg BUD three times a day. Sixteen inhaled placebo in a similar way. Treatment began 20 to 24 h after antigen exposure and continued for 2 months. BHR-H and BHR-HDM were measured prior to and at the end of treatment. BHR-H was also determined 3 days after each antigen provocation. In the children receiving BUD, mean BHR-H and mean BHR-HDM were decreased approximately twofold after 2 months. No increase in BHR-H was observed after 3 days in the BUD group, irrespective of whether a LAR occurred. In patients in whom BUD treatment was withheld after the second antigen provocation, the protective effect of BHR-H was abolished. We conclude that 2 months of treatment with an inhaled corticosteroid causes a decrease in BHR-H and BHR-HDM. When an inhaled corticosteroid is administered 20 to 24 h after antigen provocation, It may protect against the antigen-induced increase in BHR-H. After treatment is discontinued, the protective effect wears off rapidly. To determine the efficacy and safety of budesonide delivered by an inhalation-driven dry powder inhaler (Turbuhaler) in children with moderate to severe persistent asthma.
                In our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study, a total of 404 children with asthma, who were aged 6 to 18 years and who had been receiving inhaled glucocorticosteroid therapy, were randomly assigned to receive either 100, 200, or 400 micrograms of budesonide or placebo twice daily for 12 weeks. At baseline, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was 74.6% (range, 30.7% to 123.3%) of the predicted normal value.
                Patients in each of the three budesonide treatment groups showed significant dose-related improvements in lung function (morning peak expiratory flow and FEV1), in asthma symptoms, and with a significant decrease in inhaled beta 2-agonist use in comparison with placebo. Improvements were evident within 2 weeks and were maintained throughout the 12 weeks. Budesonide treatment had no significant effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function, and the incidence of reported adverse events was similar in all treatment groups.
                Budesonide administered via a dry powder inhaler provided dose-related improvements in lung function and clinical status and was well tolerated by children (6 to 18 years of age) with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Regular treatment with salbutamol increases airway responsiveness to allergen but not to methacholine and produces tolerance to the bronchoprotective effect of salbutamol. The current study addresses the effect of inhaled corticosteroid on these aspects of regular beta 2 agonist use. A group of 13 atopic asthmatic subjects free from all asthma medications and remote from allergen exposure were studied. We used a double-blind, random-order, crossover study to compare four 1-wk treatment periods with > or = 1 wk washout: placebo, salbutamol, 200 micrograms four times per day, budesonide, 400 micrograms four times per day, and the combination of salbutamol and budesonide. We measured the methacholine PC20 and the methacholine dose shift produced acutely by 200 micrograms salbutamol after 7 d and the allergen PC15 after 8 d treatment. Blinded medications were withheld for 8 to 10 h before measurements. The methacholine PC20 was not affected by regular salbutamol but increased significantly (p < 0.014) after both budesonide-containing regimens. Neither the dose shift nor its significant reduction by regularly used beta 2 agonist were influenced by the inhaled corticosteroid. The four allergen PC15 values were significantly different from each other. Compared with placebo, the allergen PC15 was 0.6 doubling doses lower after salbutamol (p = 0.021) and 1.3 doubling doses higher after budesonide (p < 0.001); the allergen PC15 was reduced by 0.53 doubling doses from this new baseline (p = 0.039) when salbutamol and budesonide were used together.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) We have investigated the effects of inhaled budesonide on the bronchial responsiveness to both directly and indirectly acting spasmogens in man. Following treatment with budesonide or placebo for three weeks in a double-blind, crossover trial with a three-week washout, the response to histamine and bradykinin was determined in ten patients with mild asthma. After treatment with budesonide, the response to both inhaled histamine and bradykinin was decreased when compared with placebo. The PD35 histamine was increased by 1.95 doubling doses and PD35 bradykinin by 2.1 doubling doses. Daily (PEF) recordings were significantly increased during budesonide therapy, the morning PEF by 34.8 +/- 14.1 L/min and evening by 50.3 +/- 23.1 L/min. Baseline laboratory lung function on the study days was not altered by budesonide nor were symptom records altered significantly. Inhaled budesonide therefore inhibits to the same extent the exaggerated response to both directly acting histamine and bradykinin which acts through airway nerves. The aim of this study was to investigate whether treatment with a low daily dose of 400 microg inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler) in newly diagnosed asthmatics could influence the course of asthma. Seventy five adult patients, mostly with mild asthma, diagnosed during the previous year and bronchial hyperresponsiveness, participated in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group multicentre study. They were treated with budesonide 200 microg b.i.d. or placebo, delivered via Turbuhaler for 12 months and followed-up for another 6 months without inhaled steroid treatment. Airway function, symptom scores, reactivity to histamine and inflammatory indices in blood were assessed. The mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 28 L x min(-1) after budesonide treatment compared with no increase in the placebo group (p=0.011). The provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PD20) (geometric mean) increased in the budesonide group by approximately two doubling dose steps, but not in the placebo group (p=0.0003). The difference between groups with regard to improvement in asthma symptom scores and inflammatory indices did not reach statistical significance. During the 6 month follow-up, the PEF values of the patients who had previously been treated with budesonide decreased by 18 L x min(-1) while the PD20 decreased by approximately one doubling dose step. In conclusion, early treatment with a low dose of budesonide improves airway function and decreases bronchial responsiveness, but the improvements are short-lasting without continued treatment. A double blind, parallel group study was carried out to investigate the effect of inhaled budesonide in a moderate (200 micrograms) and a low (100 micrograms) twice daily dosage compared with the effect of placebo in 103 adults with mild symptomatic asthma. Subjects recorded peak expiratory flow (PEF), asthma symptoms, and beta 2 agonist consumption at home for a period of seven weeks (a one week run in and six weeks' treatment). Morning baseline PEF (around 80% of predicted normal) increased non-significantly to 88% with 200 micrograms budesonide daily and to 90% (p less than 0.05) with 400 micrograms, compared with 81% with placebo. Evening PEF (around 94% of predicted normal) did not change significantly with active or placebo treatment. By comparison with placebo, there was a significant decrease in nocturnal asthma symptoms and beta 2 agonist consumption. The changes during the day were less pronounced and significant only for 400 micrograms budesonide daily. No significant differences between the two active treatments were detected. It is concluded that low doses of inhaled budesonide are effective in patients with mild symptomatic asthma, particularly for night time symptoms and early morning lung function. The early introduction of inhaled corticosteroids for patients with mild asthma and night time symptoms may improve their quality of life during the night and early morning. We studied the effect of inhaled budesonide on bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) in twenty mild asthmatic patients. The study was conducted as a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Before entering the study, the patients performed methacholine inhalation challenge (MIC) using a reservoir method to assess BHR. Then, they were randomly allocated to receive budesonide turbuhaler (200 micrograms/dose) or placebo turbuhaler two inhalations, twice daily for eight weeks. During the study, each patient recorded daily asthma score and daily number of puffs of beta 2 agonist and they were assessed at weeks 4 and 8. At the end of the treatment, MIC was repeated again. Patients receiving budesonide showed a significant improvement in airway responsiveness compared with those receiving placebo (p < 0.05). They also showed a significant improvement in asthma severity score and a significant decrease in beta 2 agonist bronchodilator use. This study also suggested that inhaled corticosteroids may be the primary treatment in patients, even with mild asthmatic and well-controlled symptoms. Airway inflammation is a hallmark of asthma, therefore current treatment recommendations include the use of inhaled glucocorticosteroids (GCS). However, there is little evidence that the effects of inhaled GCS are dose dependent.
                The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of a second-generation GCS, budesonide, delivered by Turbuhaler, in adults with chronic asthma.
                In a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-group study, 473 subjects 18 to 70 years of age received either placebo or budesonide (200, 400, 800, or 1600 microg total daily dose) administered twice daily. Primary efficacy end points were mean change from baseline for FEV1 and morning peak expiratory flow. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and by a cosyntropin-stimulation test.
                The mean baseline FEV1 was 63% to 66% of predicted normal value between groups. All doses of budesonide were more effective than placebo (p < 0.001). The mean changes in morning peak expiratory flow were 12, 22, 27, and 30 L/min in the 200, 400, 800, and 1600 microg budesonide total daily dose groups, respectively, and -27 L/min for the placebo group. A statistically significant dose-response effect for the mean change from baseline over the 12-week study was seen for both morning peak expiratory flow and FEV1. Budesonide-treated subjects also demonstrated significant reduction in asthma symptoms and bronchodilator use compared with placebo. There were no clinically significant differences in treatment-related adverse experiences among groups.
                Budesonide administered by Turbuhaler exhibited a dose response and was effective at low doses. It was well tolerated and significantly more effective than placebo. The time course of change in FEV1, bronchial reactivity, and daily measures of asthma control (peak expiratory flow, symptoms, and beta 2-agonist inhaler use) was determined during 6 wk of treatment with inhaled budesonide, 800 micrograms twice a day, and for 2 wk following cessation of treatment in 40 asthmatic subjects in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. Histamine reactivity, expressed as the provocative dose of histamine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20), was measured at intervals during the 8 wk of the study, with more frequent measurements after the first and last dose of drug to provide a detailed profile of change at the start and end of treatment. The first dose of budesonide caused a small increase in median values of FEV1 (0.2 L) and PD20 (1.0 doubling dose of histamine), which was maximum at 6 h. There was a further increase in FEV1 and PD20 over the 6 wk in the budesonide group relative to placebo, the maximum increases (0.53 L, 3.4 doubling doses of histamine) being recorded 6 h after the last dose on Day 42. Following cessation of treatment, FEV1 and PD20 declined and PD20 returned to placebo values at 1 wk. Median PEF increased by 40 and 30 L/min in the morning and evening, respectively, with budesonide treatment. Symptom scores and beta 2-agonist inhaler use were lower in the budesonide group than the placebo group during treatment but tended to be similar (symptom scores) or higher (beta 2-agonist) in the 2 wk following cessation of treatment.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) There is a transient rebound increase in bronchial reactivity to histamine and methacholine following regular treatment with an inhaled beta 2-agonist. We set out to determine whether the response to allergen was increased after cessation of regular inhaled terbutaline and whether concomitant inhaled budesonide modifies this response. In a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group design we studied 41 subjects (37 evaluable) with mild asthma who were allergic to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, grass pollen, or cat fur. Following a 2 wk run-in period, subjects underwent a fixed three-dose allergen challenge based on their previously determined provocative concentration of allergen producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) before starting terbutaline 1,000 micrograms or placebo three times daily and budesonide 800 micrograms or placebo twice daily for a period of 2 to 4 wk (mean 18 d). The same three-dose allergen challenge was repeated 33 h after stopping treatment. During treatment evening peak flow values were highest in the terbutaline plus budesonide group. Following regular terbutaline there was no rebound increase in bronchial reactivity to allergen. Following budesonide there was a significantly smaller response to allergen and an increased FEV1 compared with the other three groups, including the budesonide plus terbutaline group. The changes in median (95% CI) allergen PC20 after budesonide, terbutaline, budesonide plus terbutaline, and placebo were 0.79 (0.3, 2.3), 0.11 (-0.4, 0.6), 0.24 (-0.4, 0.5) and -0.47 (-1.5, 0.1) doubling doses (p < 0.01). The respective changes in mean FEV1 were 0.34, -0.16, -0.01, and 0.06 L (p < 0.005). Thus bronchial reactivity to allergen was not increased after regular inhaled terbutaline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The phenotypically distinct low-density eosinophil, with its greater inflammatory potential, is increased in asthma. However, the role of hypodense eosinophils in the development of asthma is still unclear. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to examine the effect of inhaled corticosteroids on the number of hypodense eosinophils in 27 asthmatic subjects and its relationship with clinical severity. The density profile of eosinophils in the peripheral blood was determined using Percoll density gradient fractionation. Eosinophils recovered from asthmatics were mainly in the lower density fractions (< 1.095 g.ml-1) (63 +/- 3%; n = 27), significantly different from those of normal subjects (27 +/- 2%; n = 7). The proportion of hypodense eosinophils was inversely related to the provocative concentration of methacholine producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (PC20) value (r = -0.75). Patients with mild asthma had a lower percentage of hypodense eosinophils (45 +/- 4%; n = 14) than those with moderate asthma (67 +/- 3%; n = 13). Inhalation of budesonide (800 micrograms.day-1) (n = 15) for 4 weeks, but not placebo, significantly improved the PC20 values by 0.97 doubling dose, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) % predicted by 17%, and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) by 15%, and decreased PEFR diurnal variability by 5.4%. The percentage of hypodense eosinophils was significantly decreased from 68 +/- 4 to 47 +/- 4% in the budesonide group (n = 15), but not in the placebo group (n = 12) (63 +/- 4 to 65 +/- 4%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Short-term lower leg growth, the insulin-like growth factor axis, and collagen turnover were assessed in 16 adolescents with asthma during treatment with inhaled budesonide, 800 micrograms/d, from a pressurized metered dose inhaler with a volume spacer. The design was a randomized double blind, placebo-controlled two-period crossover trial with treatment periods of 4 weeks and a 1-week wash-out. Lower leg growth was assessed by knemometry. Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3, and the following markers of collagen turnover were evaluated: Serum markers of type I collagen formation and degradation; the carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen and the carboxy terminal pyridinoline cross-linked telopeptide of type I procollagen (ICTP), the serum marker of type III collagen formation; the amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and the urinary concentrations of the type I collagen degradation products pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD) cross-links. Mean lower leg growth velocity was suppressed from 0.51 mm/week during placebo to 0.18 mm/week during budesonide treatment (p < 0.001). No statistically significant effects on insulin-like growth factor-1, insulin-like growth faster-binding protein-3, or carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen were observed. ICTP and PIIINP were reduced with 2.3 and 2.5 micrograms/liter (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively) during budesonide treatment, urinary concentrations of PYD and DPD with 32.9 nmol/mmol creatinine (p < 0.005) and 6.8 nmol/mmol creatinine (p < 0.005), respectively. Significant correlations between lower leg growth velocity and ICTP, PIIINP, PYD, and DPD during placebo (p < 0.01, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01) and budesonide (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05) periods were found. Short term lower leg growth suppression in adolescents treated with inhaled budesonide, 800 micrograms/d, reflects suppression of type I and III collagen turnover. To determine the ability of budesonide via an inhaler (Pulmicort Turbuhaler; Astra Draco AB) to replace oral glucocorticosteroids (GCSs) in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma.
                Double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study, with parallel groups.
                Multicenter study in outpatient setting.
                Eighty men and 79 women, aged 20 to 69 years, with moderate-to-severe asthma and a mean FEV1 of 58.3% predicted normal. All subjects were receiving oral GCS treatment and 79% of subjects were also receiving inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP). The mean daily doses of prednisone at baseline, including converted dose of BDP, for the placebo, budesonide 400 microg, and budesonide 800 microg, respectively, were 19.7 mg, 19.5 mg, and 18.7 mg.
                After a 2-week baseline period, subjects entered a 20-week treatment period, during which the oral dose of prednisone was reduced by forced down-titration at 2-weekly intervals.
                Subjects receiving 400 microg or 800 microg bid of budesonide achieved a significantly greater reduction (82.9% and 79.0% respectively) in oral GCS dose compared with placebo-treated subjects (27%; p<0.001). Two thirds of the subjects receiving budesonide were able to achieve sustained oral corticosteroid cessation, compared with 8% in the placebo group. Additionally, both doses of budesonide resulted in significant improvement in results of pulmonary function tests and asthma symptoms scores, and a significant decrease in the use of bronchodilator therapy. The mean plasma cortisol levels before and after adrenocorticotropic hormone stimulation increased most toward the normal range in the budesonide-treated groups compared with placebo-treated subjects.
                Budesonide administered via Turbuhaler has a significant oral GCS-sparing capacity with maintained or improved asthma control in adult subjects with moderate-to-severe asthma. The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide (BUD) administered via Turbuhaler once or twice daily on symptoms, lung function and bronchial hyperreactivity in children with mild asthma. One hundred and sixty-three children (mean age 9.9 yrs, 56 females/107 males) with mild asthma (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 103% of predicted, morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) 87% pred, reversibility in FEV1 3%, fall in FEV1 after exercise 10.4% from pre-exercise value) and not previously treated with inhaled steroids, were included in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study. After a two-week run-in period, the children received inhaled BUD 100 microg or 200 microg once daily in the morning, 100 microg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks. Exercise and methacholine challenges were performed before and at the end of treatment. After 12 weeks of therapy, the fall in FEV1 after an exercise test was significantly less in all three BUD groups (43-5.1%) than in the placebo group (8.6%). Bronchial hyperreactivity to methacholine with the provocative dose causing a 20% fall in FEV1 decreased significantly in the BUD 100 microg twice-daily group compared with placebo (ratio at the end of treatment 156%). Changes in baseline lung function (FEV1 and PEF) were less marked than changes in bronchial responsiveness. In conclusion, low doses of inhaled budesonide, given once or twice daily, provided protection against exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with mild asthma and near normal lung function. A simple laboratory method to evaluate relative potency of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma would be valuable. Single-dose studies with the allergen-induced late asthmatic response have failed to show a useful dose-response relationship. Treatment for several days with inhaled corticosteroids will also inhibit the allergen-induced early asthmatic response.
                Twelve atopic asthmatic subjects were studied during a season when no medications were required except ipratropium bromide as needed. These subjects had positive allergen and methacholine inhalation tests and FEV1 greater than 70% of predicted value. A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study compared placebo and budesonide 100, 200, and 400 microg administered by means of Turbuhaler twice daily for 7 days with 6-day washout periods. Methacholine PC20 was measured before and after 6 days of treatment, and allergen PC15 was measured after 7 days of treatment.
                The allergen PC15 (n = 11) was significantly larger (P = .0001) for all doses of budesonide compared with placebo, but there was no significant difference between the 3 doses of budesonide, and no dose response was demonstrated. The methacholine PC20 was significantly larger after all budesonide treatments compared with placebo (P = .024), but there was no difference between the 3 doses. There was a progressive increase in the allergen PC15 chronologically (sequence effect) that was not explained by improvement in FEV1 or airway responsiveness; sequence effects were not seen for FEV1 or for pretreatment or posttreatment methacholine PC20. Statistical adjustment for sequence effect did not alter allergen PC15 statistics.
                A 7-day course of budesonide administered by means of Turbuhaler at 200, 400, or 800 microg per day provided marked and significant inhibition of the allergen-induced early asthmatic response compared with placebo. There was, however, no difference between the 3 doses. Therefore this method with these doses is not useful for providing assessment of relative potency. There is increasing evidence for the development of tolerance to the protective effects of inhaled beta 2-agonists against bronchoconstrictor stimuli. Animal studies have suggested that glucocorticoids protect against the down-regulation of beta 2-receptors after chronic exposure to beta 2-agonists. In a double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study in 12 patients with mild asthma, we investigated the effect of inhaled budesonide or identical placebo on the protection conferred by albuterol (200 micrograms) against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction before and after treatment with the long-acting beta 2-agonist salmeterol. Patients were randomized to be treated for 3 wk with inhaled budesonide (800 micrograms twice a day) or placebo; salmeterol (50 micrograms twice a day) was added during the third week. Airway responsiveness to methacholine was measured 15 min after albuterol, both before and exactly 12 h [corrected] after the last salmeterol dose. Mean FEV1 increased significantly after 2 wk of budesonide (p < 0.05) and increased further after salmeterol (p < 0.05) compared with placebo. After 2 wk, the bronchoprotective effect of albuterol against methacholine was significantly greater with budesonide than with placebo (3.4 versus 2.4 doubling dilutions; p < 0.05), consistent with an improvement in airway hyperresponsiveness with budesonide therapy. However, regular salmeterol treatment for 1 wk significantly diminished the protection conferred by albuterol against methacholine challenge, both with budesonide and with placebo (-1.1 +/- 0.42 and -1.41 +/- 0.30 doubling dilutions, respectively). There was no significant difference in the loss of bronchoprotection seen with salmeterol between budesonide and placebo treatment periods. Our study suggests that even a high dose of an inhaled glucocorticoid fails to prevent the loss of bronchoprotection produced by regular beta 2-agonist therapy. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is elevated in untreated patients with asthma but not in patients treated with inhaled glucocorticoids. This may reflect an inhibitory effect of glucocorticoids on the induction of the enzyme NO synthase in the respiratory tract. We have now studied the effect of an inhaled glucocorticoid (budesonide 800 micrograms twice daily via a dry powder delivery system for 3 wk) on exhaled NO in 11 patients with mild asthma in a double-blind crossover randomized-order placebo-controlled study. Exhaled NO was reduced from a baseline value of 203 +/- 29 parts per billion (ppb) to 120 +/- 26 ppb after 3 wk of treatment (p < 0.01), whereas there was no change after a matched placebo (169 +/- 20 at baseline compared with 184 +/- 16 ppb after 3 wk). A significant and progressive fall in exhaled NO was found from 1 to 3 wk. There was no significant change in FEV1 after inhaled steroids (although mean FEV1 was 92% predicted normal at baseline), although there was a reduction in airway responsiveness to methacholine (approximately 2.5 doubling dilutions). These results add further support to the view that the elevated levels of exhaled NO in asthma may derive from induction of an inducible isoform of NO synthase and indicate that exhaled NO may be a useful way of monitoring the anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids and other anti-inflammatory treatments in asthma. Effects of the inhaled corticosteroid budesonide and the oral beta-agonist bambuterol on the nocturnal worsening of asthma were studied in patients with allergic asthma with a circadian peak expiratory flow variation greater than or equal to 15% (group 1, n = 8) and less than 15% (group 2, n = 9). Airflow limitation and airway responsiveness to histamine were measured during 24 hours after 4 weeks of treatment with (A) 0.4 mg budesonide at 8 AM and 8 PM, (B) 20 mg bambuterol at 8 PM, and (C) placebo, in a randomized, crossover design. Patients in group 1 had worse nocturnal symptom scores and a greater airway responsiveness than patients in group 2; in addition, patients in group 1 had a larger increase in responsiveness during the night (1.1 versus 0.6 doubling concentrations [DC]). Both budesonide and bambuterol improved responsiveness more at night than during daytime, thus decreasing circadian variation: at 4 AM, increases in PC20 were 2.0 DC after budesonide and 0.8 DC after bambuterol, compared with placebo. Bambuterol reduced circadian variation in FEV1, but in contrast to budesonide, did not improve 24-hour mean levels of FEV1 and PC20. Both drugs beneficially influenced nocturnal symptoms; the effects of budesonide were stronger than those of bambuterol. Our findings demonstrate that budesonide and bambuterol reduce nocturnal airway responsiveness and asthma symptoms and suggest a relationship between the degree of airway responsiveness and the presence of nocturnal symptoms of asthma. Previous studies have shown that asthmatics have hyperinflation as defined by larger total lung capacity. The present study was set up in order to document changes in asthma clinic, airway calibre, airway reactivity and lung volumes after budesonide treatment. After a 2-week run-in period, 28 children with moderate persistent asthma were treated in a double-blind manner either with budesonide (0.4 mg/day) or placebo for 8 weeks and, thereafter, all patients were treated with open-label budesonide for a further 20 weeks. Symptoms, bronchodilator requirements and airway calibre improved significantly after 8 weeks of treatment (p < 0.05 for each) and prolonged treatment did not cause any further improvement. Reduction in hyperreactivity was apparent only after 20-28 weeks of treatment. Total lung capacity decreased along with budesonide treatment in both groups suggesting that early introduction of an inhaled corticosteroid may be useful in the prevention of asthma-related remodelling of the lung and thoracic cage. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma is characterized by an increase in sensitivity and in maximal response to airway-narrowing stimuli. Long-term therapy with inhaled corticosteroids is known to reduce airway hypersensitivity in asthmatic patients. To investigate whether these drugs also reduce the maximal degree of airway narrowing we studied the effects of inhaled budesonide on the maximal response plateau of the dose-response curve to inhaled methacholine in mildly asthmatic patients in whom a raised plateau could be measured. Sixteen atopic patients with mild asthma were placed randomly into two parallel treatment groups to receive double-blindly either budesonide (400 micrograms twice daily) or placebo, inhaled via a Turbuhaler, for 4 wk. Before treatment, after 2 and 4 wk of treatment, and after 2 and 4 wk of wash-out, complete dose-response curves to methacholine were obtained using a standardized 2-min tidal breathing method. The response was measured by FEV1, expressed in % fall from baseline. A plateau on the log dose-response curve was considered if three or more data points fell within a 5% response range. The maximal response was obtained by averaging the values on the plateau (MFEV1), and the sensitivity was calculated from the provocative concentration of methacholine, causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20). After 4 wk of budesonide treatment, mean MFEV1 decreased from 41.6 to 33.7% fall (p = 0.0004). The changes in MFEV1 were significantly different between placebo and budesonide (p = 0.03). The geometric mean PC20 increased from 3.4 to 6.3 mg/ml (p = 0.02), but the changes in PC20 were not different between the two groups (p = 0.23).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Inhaled antiasthmatic steroids have been assumed and yet never proved to exert their antiasthmatic effect by topical action in the airways. We tested the hypothesis that the efficacy of inhaled budesonide (BUD) might be due instead to its systemic activity after absorption. We compared inhaled and oral BUD with doses selected to ensure higher peak plasma levels and a greater area under the plasma concentration curve with the oral treatment. After pretreatment with beclomethasone to maximize asthma control, 47 adults with asthma were randomized to receive 0.4 mg of inhaled BUD per day (n = 16) or 1.4 mg of oral BUD per day (n = 15), or placebo (n = 16) in double-blind fashion and then followed weekly until asthma relapsed or for 8 weeks if no relapse occurred. "Relapse" was defined as a drop in the mean peak expiratory flow rate greater than 2 SEM below the mean during the baseline week before switching to the test drugs. The time to relapse was the primary outcome variable. Time to relapse was longer with inhaled than with oral BUD (medians, 22 versus 7.9 days; p = 0.003) or placebo (medians, 22 versus 9 days; p = 0.004). Oral BUD and placebo did not differ (p = 0.41). The morning serum cortisol levels remained normal during all three treatments. Thus, at conventional dosage the antiasthmatic effect of inhaled BUD may be fully explained by a local intrapulmonary action.
This review strongly supports use of budesonide in chronic asthma. Consensus guidelines for chronic asthma suggest titrating inhaled steroid dose to individual requirements. Evidence from this review of trials does not present a case for routine dose titration above 800 mcg/d.