A controlled clinical trial of fluspirilene, a long-acting injectable neuroleptic, in schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. Double-blind therapeutic evaluation of fluspirilene compared with fluphenazine decanoate in chronic schizophrenics. [Results with the sustained-action neuroleptic fluspirilene on chronic schizophrenic patients undergoing occupational therapy]. Fluspirilene and pipothiazine undecylenate, two long-acting injectable neuroleptics. A double-blind controlled trial in residual schizophrenia. A double-blind clinical evaluation of different dose intervals with fluspirilene (IMAP). A double-blind comparison of fluspirilene and fluphenazine decanoate in schizophrenia. A controlled study of fluspirilene in chronic schizophrenia. [A comparative study of the longacting neuroleptics perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene (author's transl)]. A comparison of fluspirilene and trifluoperazine in the treatment of acute schizophrenic psychosis. A multicenter controlled trial of fluspirilene and fluphenazine enanthate in chronic schizophrenic syndromes.
A 4-week double-blind controlled clinical trial was carried out in which fluspirilene, an injectable diphenylbutylpiperidine neuroleptic given weekly, was compared to chlorpromazine in the treatment of 40 newly admitted schizophrenic patients with acute exacerbation. Similar therapeutic improvement was obtained with both drugs, but men needed a significantly higher mean dose of fluspirilene (23 mg/week) than women (13 mg/week). Fluspirilene induced more parkinsonism than chlorpromazine, but less drowsiness, dizziness, and dry mouth. The difference between the sexes in the potency of fluspirilene and its greater potential to induce parkinsonism may be related to its lesser presynaptic and D1-dopamine receptor blocking properties. The low incidence of autonomic side effects confirms the relative specificity of fluspirilene for dopamine receptors. Fifty chronic schizophrenics were randomly assigned to a 16-week treatment either with fluspirilene or with fluphenazine decanoate. The aim of the study was to compare the antipsychotic action and the side effects of the two neuroleptics. Fluphenazine decanoate caused more side effects and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant in the items tremor, severe extrapyramidal effects and parkinsonism. More patients in the fluspirilene group (nine patients) compared with only three in the fluphenazine decanoate group remained free of side effects during the whole trial. Judged from the BPRS fluspirilene proved an equally potent neuroleptic with fluphenazine decanoate although statistically significant improvement has been obtained in more items of the scale in the fluspirilene group. The improvement in the NOSIE-30 was much more clear in the fluspirilene group. Although Clinical Global Impressions of the investigators and the nursing personnel favored fluspirilene, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. nan nan The possibility of a biweekly dose of fluspirilene, without deterioration of the clinical picture, was investigated in a group of 34 chronic schizophrenic patients. There were no significant clinical difference between the patients receiving fluspirilene every week and the patients receiving it every two weeks. Therefore it is possible to give fluspirilene in individually adjusted doses with a dose interval of 14 days in stabilized patients. A double-blind comparison of fluspirilene and fluphenazine decanoate in 28 schizophrenic patients over six months showed equal improvement and the same incidence of side-effects in each group of patients. It would be expected from the literature that a better ratio of therapeutic to side-effects would appear with fluspirilene than with fluphenazine. The absence of such an effect in this study may be attributable to an initial lack of familiarity by the investigators with the use of fluspirilene, indicating an important potential variable in the comparison of a new drug with an established one. nan The clinical profile and side-effects of perphenazin-enanthate and fluspirilene were compared in 45 female chronic schizophrenic patients. 100 mg perphenazin-enanthate fortnightly or 8 mg fluspirilene weekly were administered. During the four months' period the psychopathological and somatic symptoms were evaluated by means of the AMP-system and the self-evaluation scale PD-S (v. Zerssen). A covariance analysis was carried out covering 12 AMP syndromes and 6 PD-S factors. The antipsychotic effect of both drugs was similar concerning the paranoid, the hallucinatory-desintegrative and the catatonic syndromes. A significant difference with regard to perphenazin-enanthate was found in the AMP-syndromes of hostility, hypochondria, and autonomic symptoms. Neither drug induced any depression. In the self-rating scale, the factors anxiousness and depressivity were also significantly lower in the perphenazin-enanthate regime. The patients under perphenazin-enanthate required a smaller amount of antiparkinsonian drugs. The more pronounced sedative effect of perphenazin-enanthate can be recommended in hostile and restless schizophrenic patients, whereas fluspirilene should be given to inactive autistic patients. nan nan
Participant numbers in each comparison were small and we found no clear differences between fluspirilene and oral medication or other depots. The choice of whether to use fluspirilene as a depot medication and whether it has advantages over other depots cannot, at present, be informed by trial-derived data. Well-conducted and reported randomised trials are still needed to inform practice.