Magnesium sulfate as a vehicle for nebulized salbutamol in acute asthma. A randomized clinical trial of nebulized magnesium sulfate in addition to albuterol in the treatment of acute mild-to-moderate asthma exacerbations in adults. Nebulized magnesium sulphate versus nebulized salbutamol in acute bronchial asthma: a clinical trial. Usefulness of inhaled magnesium sulfate in the coadjuvant management of severe asthma crisis in an emergency department. Comparison of nebulized magnesium sulfate plus albuterol to nebulized albuterol plus saline in children with acute exacerbations of mild to moderate asthma. Comparison of nebulised magnesium sulphate and salbutamol combined with salbutamol alone in the treatment of acute bronchial asthma: a randomised study. Inhalation therapy with magnesium sulfate and salbutamol sulfate in bronchial asthma. A randomized clinical trial of magnesium sulphate as a vehicle for nebulized salbutamol in the treatment of moderate to severe asthma attacks.
Magnesium sulfate is thought to be an effective bronchodilator when administered intravenously to patients with acute severe asthma, and it can be safely administered via inhalation to patients with stable asthma. Our goal was to determine if isotonic magnesium sulfate could be used as a vehicle for nebulized salbutamol for patients with acute asthma.
                We enrolled 35 patients with acute asthma in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After measurement of peak expiratory flow, patients received 2.5 mg salbutamol plus either 3 mL normal saline solution (n = 16) or isotonic magnesium sulfate (n = 19) through a jet nebulizer. Peak flow was reassessed 10 and 20 minutes after treatment.
                Peak flow at baseline was similar in the two groups. Ten minutes after baseline, the mean (+/- SD) percentage increase in peak flow was greater in the magnesium sulfate-salbutamol group (61% +/- 45%) than in the normal saline-salbutamol group (31% +/- 28%; difference = 30%; 95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference: 3% to 56%; P = 0.03). At 20 minutes, the percentage increase in peak flow was 57% greater in the magnesium sulfate group (95% CI: 4% to 110%, P = 0.04). There was a significant inverse correlation between baseline peak flow (percent of predicted) and the percentage increase in peak flow at 20 minutes in the magnesium sulfate group (r = -0.82, P <0.0001), but not in the saline group (r = -0.12, P = 0.67).
                In patients with acute asthma, isotonic magnesium sulfate, as a vehicle for nebulized salbutamol, increased the peak flow response to treatment in comparison with salbutamol plus normal saline. We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of nebulized magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) plus albuterol with that of albuterol alone in adult patients with mild-to-moderate acute asthma exacerbations.
                Patients were randomized to receive nebulized MgSO(4) (384 mg in 6 mL of sterile water) or an equal volume of placebo (normal saline solution) in a double-blind fashion after each dose of nebulized albuterol administered (2.5 mg/3 mL) every 20 minutes for the first hour of the study. Spirometry was performed at baseline and every 20 minutes for 2 hours. Monitoring for safety included vital signs, pulse oximetry, and serum magnesium levels. Improvement in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second was chosen as a primary efficacy end point.
                Among 74 patients enrolled, 37 were randomized to each of 2 study groups. There were no statistically or clinically significant differences between the 2 study groups in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second at any point during the trial or overall. There were no significant differences in vital signs, pulse oximetry, or serum magnesium levels at any point during the study.
                The combination of nebulized MgSO(4) and albuterol provides no benefit in addition to that provided by therapy with albuterol in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma exacerbations. The efficacy of nebulized MgSO(4) in patients with severe asthma exacerbations remains unknown. Intravenous magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) has successfully been used in the treatment of acute asthma. The present study investigated the efficacy of nebulized MgSO4 as a bronchodilator in acute asthma as compared to nebulized salbutamol. This was a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Asthmatics aged 12-60 yrs in acute exacerbation, with a peak expiratory flow (PEF) <300 L x min(-1), not having taken bronchodilators and not requiring assisted ventilation were included. Patients were randomized to receive treatment with serial nebulizations of either 3 mL (3.2% solution, 95 mg) MgSO4 solution or 3 mL (2.5 mg) salbutamol solution. All patients were also given 100 mg hydrocortisone i.v., and were monitored continuously for 2 h after which they were given supplemental treatment (if and when needed) and either discharged or admitted. Fischl index, PEF improvements (in % predicted) and admission rates were the outcome variables. Thirty-three patients were studied. Fischl score improvement was comparable and significant in both groups (4.31 to 0.43 in the MgSO4 group and 4.29 to 0.76 in the salbutamol group). The increase in PEF was statistically significant and comparable in both groups (by 35% pred in the MgSO4 and by 42% pred in the salbutamol group). Two patients warranted admission in the salbutamol group and one in the MgSO4 group. Nebulized MgSO4 had a significant bronchodilatory effect in acute asthma. This effect was not significantly different from that of nebulized salbutamol. Treatment of severe asthma may be difficult despite the use of several medications including parenteral corticosteroids. Intravenous magnesium sulfate (MgSO(4)) is one ancillary drug for severe crisis; its inhaled use is controversial.
                To evaluate the usefulness of inhaled MgSO(4) compared to placebo in improving lung function, oxygen saturation, and reducing hospital admission as an adjunct to standard treatment in severe asthma crisis.
                We conducted a placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial with asthmatic patients >18 years of age with asthmatic crisis and FEV(1)<60% of predicted (%p). All subjects received 125 mg of IV methylprednisolone followed by nebulization with the combination of albuterol (7.5mg) and ipratropium bromide (1.5mg) diluted in 3 ml of isotonic saline solution (as placebo) or 3 ml (333 mg) of MgSO(4). After 90 min, subjects with FEV(1)<60%p or SpO(2)<88% or persistent symptoms were admitted to the emergency department (ED).
                We included 30 patients per group who were similar at baseline. The MgSO(4) group showed higher post-bronchodilator (post-BD) FEV(1)%p (69+/-13 vs. 61+/-12, p<0.014) and SpO(2) (92+/-4 vs. 88+/-5%, p<0.006) than the placebo group. Fewer treated patients were admitted to the ED (5 vs. 13) (p<0.047), with relative risk (RR) of 0.26 (95% CI 0.079-0.870).
                Adding inhaled MgSO(4) treatment to standard therapy in severe asthma crisis improves FEV(1)%p and SpO(2) post-BD and reduces the rate of ED admissions.
                Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. A prospective, randomized, double blinded study was conducted to determine whether a combination of nebulized magnesium sulfate and albuterol as a single dose adds any benefit in management of children with mild to moderate asthma when compared to nebulized albuterol with saline. The difference in FEV1 was significant at 10 and 20 min after a single dose of the combined treatment with magnesium and albuterol when compared with the albuterol and saline group (1.41 L +/- 0.53 vs. 1.13 L +/- 0.34, respectively, p = 0.03). The addition of magnesium to albuterol seems to provide short-term benefits in children with acute exacerbations of mild to moderate asthma. To test the hypothesis that combined administration of multiple doses of nebulised salbutamol and magnesium sulphate provides additional benefit compared with salbutamol alone in adult patients with acute asthma.
                Randomised, double blind, prospective study.
                A total of 100 patients presenting to an emergency department with an acute attack of bronchial asthma were randomised to two groups: nebulisation with a combination of salbutamol and magnesium sulphate (group A) and nebulisation with salbutamol only (group B). Both groups received nebulisation thrice at intervals of 20 minutes. Salbutamol and magnesium sulphate were administered in doses of 0.5 mg and 500 mg, respectively, and the solutions were made isotonic to plasma osmolality. Pulse rate, blood pressure, and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were measured at baseline and at 15, 60, 75, and 120 minutes. Serum magnesium levels and blood gases were measured at 0 and 120 minutes in both groups.
                All patients had either acute severe or life threatening asthma. The baseline characteristics were comparable in the two groups. Both groups showed significant rise in PEFR at all time intervals, however, there was no significant difference between the groups in rise in PEFR at any time point. Serum magnesium levels remained within normal limits, and there was no difference in requirement of additional medication during the study or hospital admission rates in both groups. No significant side effects were noted.
                This study suggests that there is no therapeutic benefit of adding magnesium sulphate to salbutamol nebulisation in the treatment of patients with acute severe or life threatening asthma. Inhalation therapy with magnesium sulfate and salbutamol sulfate was applied to two groups, each consisting of 20 patients with acute asthma. The effects of inhaled magnesium sulfate and salbutamol sulfate were compared. The evaluation of patients was done using respiratory score, peak expiratory flow rate with a Wright peak flow meter, respiration rate, heart rate and blood pressure. Although magnesium sulfate's bronchodilating effect continued for approximately one hour, treatment of acute asthma using salbutamol sulfate inhalation was found to be more successful and its effect continued for six hours. Although it is well known that intravenous administration of MgSO4 as an adjunct to conventional therapy is effective in treating asthma attacks, the effect of nebulized MgSO4 as a vehicle for salbutamol has been less evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of nebulized salbutamol administrated through either MgSO4 or isotonic saline solution on the 'peak expiratory flow rate' (PEFR), other respiratory and clinical parameters, and hospitalization rate of patients suffering from moderate to severe asthma attacks. Twenty-six patients with asthma attack were enrolled in the study in a randomized single blind fashion. After obtaining initial peak expiratory flow measurements (PEFR) and clinical evaluation, all patients received 1mg/kg corticosteroids and oxygen therapy and then either isotonic MgSO4 (2.5 ml, 6.3%)+salbutamol (2.5 ml) or saline (2.5 ml)+salbutamol (2.5 ml) through a jet nebulizer (group 1 (n=14) vs group 2 (n=12), respectively). The nebulizations were repeated every 20 min for the first hour and every hour for the rest of 4 h. The PEFR measurements and clinical assessment were performed after nebulization at 20th, 60th, 120th, 180th and 240th minutes. Patients were discharged when PEFR reached the target level of 70% of predicted. The baseline PEFRs and clinical parameters were similar between groups 1 and 2 (50.2+/-18.5 vs 44.1+/-13.9, respectively, p>0.05). The mean% increase in PEFR at different measurement levels was similar between the groups. When the treatment response was evaluated within the groups, group 2 showed statistically significant increase in PEFR (% of predicted) 1h earlier than group 1 (60th vs 120th minute, p=0.003 vs p=0.007). The mean duration of achieving target-PEFRs was 105.7+/-72.1 min for group 1 and 118.3+/-96.7 min for group 2 (p>0.05). This study suggested that the additional usage of MgSO4 to nebulized salbutamol has no beneficial effect on the treatment of asthma attacks.
There is currently no good evidence that inhaled MgSO4 can be used as a substitute for inhaled β2-agonists. When used in addition to inhaled β2-agonists (with or without inhaled ipratropium), there is currently no overall clear evidence of improved pulmonary function or reduced hospital admissions. However, individual study results from three trials suggest possible improved pulmonary function in those with severe asthma exacerbations (FEV1 less than 50% predicted). Heterogeneity among trials included in this review precludes a more definitive conclusion. Further studies should focus on inhaled MgSO4 in addition to the current guideline treatment for acute asthma (inhaled β2 -agonist and ipratropium bromide). As the evidence suggests that the most effective role of nebulised MgSO4 may be in those with severe acute features and this is where future research should be focused. A set of core outcomes needs to be agreed upon both in adult and paediatric studies to allow improved study comparison in future.