Recognizing influenza in older patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who have received influenza vaccine. Impact of a winter respiratory virus season on patients with COPD and association with influenza vaccination. Longer term effects of live influenza vaccine in patients with chronic pulmonary disease. Efficacy trial of live, cold-adapted and inactivated influenza virus vaccines in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a VA cooperative study. Adverse effects associated with influenza vaccination in patients with COPD: a randomized controlled study. Economic evaluation of influenza vaccination in Thai chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Clinical trials of bivalent influenza A/New Jersey/76-A/Victoria/75 vaccines in the elderly. Influenza virus vaccination of patients with chronic lung disease. A study of live influenza virus vaccine in patients with chronic bronchitis. Report to Medical Research Council's Committee on Influenza and Other Respiratory Virus Vaccines. Advisory Group on pulmonary function tests in relation to live influenza virus vaccines. Acute respiratory illness in patients with COPD and the effectiveness of influenza vaccination: a randomized controlled study. Evaluation of cold-adapted, reassortant influenza B virus vaccines in elderly and chronically ill adults. Adverse reactions to influenza vaccine in elderly people: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial. The efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly individuals. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Protective efficacy of combined live intranasal and inactivated influenza A virus vaccines in the elderly.
A substudy analysis was conducted to determine the clinical characteristics associated with symptomatic, laboratory-documented influenza (LDI) among 2215 veterans with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who participated in Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study 448 and who received trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine with or without intranasal live-attenuated, cold-adapted influenza vaccine. Of 585 evaluable first occurrences of acute respiratory illnesses, 94 (16%) were LDI. Respiratory symptoms of cough, sputum production, and dyspnea occurred in >90% of patients with LDI; 68% had documented or subjective fever, and 81% had myalgias. Stepwise logistic regression identified only fever and myalgia as being statistically associated with LDI. During the influenza outbreak period, the positive predictive value of fever and myalgia was 41%. Clinical criteria were poor predictors of LDI in these older, vaccinated patients with chronic lung disease. Additional studies are warranted to define optimal methods for the diagnosis of influenza among older persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We assessed the effects of an influenza season on patients with COPD. Data from 2,215 veterans in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind influenza vaccine efficacy study were analyzed for changes in spirometric and functional status, comparing patients with laboratory-documented influenza (LDI)-caused illness, non-LDI-caused respiratory illness, or no illness, and for association with influenza vaccination.
                Patients received either IM trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TIV) plus intranasal trivalent, live attenuated, cold-adapted influenza virus vaccine (TC) or TIV plus intranasal placebo (TP). We performed spirometry, measured the chronic lung disease severity index (CLDSI) score to assess functional status and well-being, and tested for influenza virus infection.
                Worsening in FEV(1), percentage of predicted FEV(1), and CLDSI score (p < 0.001) was associated with acute respiratory illness in 585 illnesses including 94 LDI-caused illnesses. LDI-caused illness was more likely to be associated with worsening in FEV(1) and CLDSI score acutely than non-LDI-caused illness (p < 0.01). Logistic regression showed acute respiratory illness (odds ratio [OR], 1.78; 95% confidence limit [CL], 1.40 to 2.26) to be associated with worsening in CLDSI score, and receipt of TC (OR, 1.39; 95% CL, 1.10 to 1.74) and no illness (OR, 0.70; 95% CL, 0.53 to 0.91 for acute respiratory illness) to be associated with better CLDSI score at the end of the study. Hospitalization was more frequent in patients with acute respiratory illness (p < 0.0001).
                Acute respiratory illness was associated with increased health-care utilization and obstruction to airflow, and worse functional status and well-being. At the end of the study, receipt of TC was associated with improvement and acute respiratory illness was associated with worsening in functional status and well-being. WRL 105 strain live influenza vaccine or placebo was given to patients with chronic bronchitis in a double-blind study. The twenty-one vaccinated and twenty-three placebo-treated patients made daily self-assessments of the severity of symptoms of cough, breathlessness, tightness, wheeze, and sputum production in the following 20 weeks. Symptom scores in the first 2 weeks after vaccination or treatment with placebo were used to calculate a baseline range for each patient. Comparison of symptoms in the two groups in the baseline period showed that symptoms were more often reported by vaccinated than by placebo-treated patients but the differences were not statistically significant. One patient who responded serologically to vaccination had a moderately severe influenzal illness starting on the day after vaccination. Comparison of symptom scores during the 18-week surveillance period with baseline values showed that symptoms of breathlessness, tightness, wheeze and cough were significantly more common in vaccinated than in placebo-treated patients and that antibiotic usage was more common in the vaccinated group. We assessed whether trivalent live, cold-adapted influenza virus (CAIV-T) vaccine provides added protection when co-administered with trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TVV) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Subjects (N=2215) were randomly assigned to receive either TVV intramuscularly (IM) and CAIV-T intranasally (TC), or TVV and placebo (TP). The vaccines were well-tolerated. Efficacy of TC compared to TP was not statistically significant and was 0.16 for any influenza virus strain (95% confidence limit (CL): -0.22, 0.43), 0.26 for A (H3N2) virus (95% CL: -0.17, 0.53), and -0.05 for type B virus (95% CL: -1.13, 0.48). However, there was a possible advantage for TC over TP in reducing respiratory consequences of an influenza season measured by pulmonary function and symptoms at end of study. The aim of this study was to assess the frequency and type of adverse reactions following influenza vaccination and its effects on lung function, dyspnoeic symptoms, exercise capacity, and clinical acute respiratory illness (ARI) in patients with COPD, and the relationship of these adverse effects to the degree of airflow obstruction.
                A stratified, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was conducted over an 18-month period at a single university hospital. In total, 125 patients with COPD were randomized to the vaccine group (62 patients who received purified trivalent split-virus vaccine injections) or the placebo group (63 patients). Local and systemic symptoms during the week following the injections were evaluated. Clinical ARI, lung function tests, dyspnoeic symptoms (assessed using a visual analogue scale), and a 6-min walking test were evaluated before and at 1 week and 4 weeks following vaccination.
                The frequency of local adverse reactions was 27% in the vaccine group and 6% in the placebo group (P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in systemic adverse reactions between the vaccine and placebo groups (76% vs. 81%; P= 0.5). No difference was observed in the incidence of ARI between the vaccine and placebo groups during the first week (6.4% vs. 6.3%; P= 1) and the first 4 weeks (24.2% vs. 31.7%; P= 0.5) following vaccination. There was no significant change in lung function, dyspnoeic symptoms, and exercise capacity of the patients in both groups, at 1 week and 4 weeks following vaccination, regardless of the severity of COPD.
                Influenza vaccination is associated with minimal local adverse reactions in patients with COPD. Vaccination does not cause systemic adverse reactions, induce clinical exacerbations or adversely affect lung function, dyspnoeic symptoms and exercise capacity in patients with COPD, regardless of the severity of airflow obstruction. To determine the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients the authors conducted a stratified randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial from June 1997 to November 1998 at a university hospital in Thailand. A total of 125 COPD patients were stratified based on their FEV1 as mild COPD (FEV1 > or = 70% predicted), moderate COPD (FEV1 50-69% predicted) and severe COPD (FEV1 < 50% predicted) and in each severity stratum they were randomized to the vaccine group (received intramuscular injection with purified trivalent split-virus vaccine containing A/Texas/36/91 (H1N1), A/Nanchang 1933/95 (H3N2) and B/Harbin 107/94) or the placebo group (received intramuscular injection with vit B1). Number of episodes of acute respiratory illness (ARI) related to influenza (clinical ARI + a serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titre of 38 or greater and a four fold titre increase in convalescent serum compared to acute serum) as well as severity of each ARI (outpatient treatment, hospitalization or required mechanical ventilation) and costs of treatment (direct medical costs comprised real drug costs from the hospital dispensary in outpatient cases and real charges in hospitalization cases) were collected and analyzed for the cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination. The incidence of influenza-related ARI in the study year was 27 per cent in the placebo group and 6.4 per cent in the vaccine group (relative risk [RR] 0.24, vaccine effectiveness 76%). The incidence was 27.3 per cent, 23.5 per cent and 29.2 per cent in mild, moderate and severe COPD respectively in the placebo group and 4.3 per cent, 12.5 per cent, and 4.3 per cent in the mild, moderate and severe COPD respectively in the vaccine group (RR 0.16, 0.53 and 0.15; vaccine effectiveness 84%, 47%, and 85% respectively). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios demonstrated that for every 100 patients with mild COPD whom the authors decided to vaccinate, the cost would be 24,840 baht more and would prevent 18.2 outpatients, 4.8 hospitalizations and 0 patient from mechanical ventilation due to ARI related to influenza. Likewise, the authors would have prevented 5.1 outpatients, 5.9 hospitalizations, 5.9 mechanical ventilation and 20.8 outpatients, 3.9 hospitalizations, 8.3 mechanical ventilation for every 100 moderate COPD and every 100 severe COPD patients vaccinated respectively. More than 90 per cent of the costs of treatment of influenza-related ARI were costs of hospitalization and for patients with moderate and severe airflow obstruction, more than 90 per cent of these costs were attributed to the costs of treating the patients who required mechanical ventilation. Predicted cost savings for every 100 mild COPD, 100 moderate COPD and 100 severe COPD patients vaccinated were 125,629 baht, 538,184.3 baht, and 680,647.1 baht respectively. In conclusion: Influenza vaccination is highly effective in the prevention of acute respiratory illness related to influenza virus infection in COPD, regardless of severity of airflow obstruction. Vaccination is more cost-effective in preventing mechanical ventilation episodes and more cost-benefit in patients with more severe airflow obstruction. Influenza vaccination should be recommended to all patients with COPD with the higher priority provided to patients with more severe airflow obstruction. This placebo-controlled evaluation in elderly persons of inactivated influenza virus vaccines containing 200 or 400 chicke cell-agglutinating units of both A/New Jersey/76 and A/Victoria/75 antigens revealed mild systemic reactions in 7.8% and moderate reactions in 4.9% of vaccinees. These reactions were more common after administration of whole-virus than subvirion vaccines, more frequent in females than males, and more frequent in persons with low initial titers of antibody to A/New Jersey antigen. Local inflammation occurred in 18.7% of vaccinees (predominantly females) and frequently was seen with systemic reactions, but did not correlate with antibody response. Titers of antibody to A/New Jersey antigen were initially high and 99% of vaccinees had titers of greater than 1:20 after vaccination. Titers of antibody to A/Victoria antigen were initially low, and 56% of vaccinees had titers of greater than 1:20 after vaccination. Fourfold or greater increases in titer occurred in about 50% of vaccinees for each virus, most often concomitantly. Antibody responses to subvirion and whole-virus vaccines were similar, and increased responses with higher doses coincided with increased reactogenicity. Later revaccinations because of low titers of A/Victoria antibody produced negligible antibody responses. To evaluate the safety of, and mucosal and systemic immune responses induced by two influenza virus vaccine regimens in subjects with COPD.
                Single-center, blinded, randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating two vaccine regimens.
                Outpatient clinics of St. Louis Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
                Volunteers (age range, 42 to 88 years) had preexisting COPD with severe obstruction to airflow on average, were male, and were not receiving immunosuppressive medication.
                Twenty-nine volunteers were randomly assigned to receive either bivalent live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine (CAV) or saline solution placebo intranasally. All subjects also received an i.m. injection of trivalent inactivated influenza virus vaccine (TVV) simultaneously.
                Clinical status and pulmonary function measured by spirometry did not change significantly after vaccination. Using hemagglutinins (H1 and H3 HA) which more closely resembled those in CAV, mean levels of anti-HA immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies in nasal washings increased significantly after vaccination with CAV and TVV compared to prevaccination, but they did not increase significantly after TVV and intranasal placebo. Mean levels of influenza A virus-stimulated interleukin-2 and -4 produced by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro increased significantly after administration of the combination vaccine regimen and to a lesser extent after TVV and intranasal placebo compared to respective prevaccination levels. The timing of the cytokine response appeared different following CAV and TVV compared to TVV and intranasal placebo.
                Intranasally administered CAV was safe when given with i.m. administered TVV and there may be an immunologic advantage to administration of the combination vaccine regimen compared to TVV with intranasal placebo. A multicentre study of the effects of influenza virus RIT 4050 (H3N2) in patients with chronic bronchitis was conducted by members of an MRC Committee. The results showed that RIT 4050 vaccine virus did not cause a deterioration in clinical or physiological status in these patients within the limitation of the relatively reproducible ventilatory tests which were employed. This conclusion applied equally to those who were inoculated and became infected and to those who failed to develop serological evidence of infection. The relatively high proportion of antibody-negative volunteers not infected by the inoculated virus raises doubts concerning the value of this method of immunization for patients at risk during influenza epidemics. To determine the effectiveness of influenza vaccination on influenza-related acute respiratory illness (ARI) and overall ARI in patients with COPD, and its relationship to the degree of airflow obstruction.
                Stratified, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
                From June 1997 to November 1998 at a single university hospital. Patients and interventions: One hundred twenty-five patients with COPD were stratified based on their FEV(1) as having mild, moderate, and severe COPD. Within each group, they were randomized to the vaccine group (62 patients who received purified, trivalent, split-virus vaccine) or the placebo group (63 patients).
                The number of episodes and severity of total ARI, classified as outpatient treatment, hospitalization, and requirement of mechanical ventilation; and the number of episodes and severity of influenza-related ARI.
                The incidence of influenza-related ARI was 28.1 per 100 person-years and 6.8 per 100 person-years in the placebo group and vaccine group, respectively (relative risk [RR], 0.24 [p = 0.005]; vaccine effectiveness, 76%). The incidences were 28.2, 23.8, and 31.2 per 100 person-years in the patients with mild, moderate, and severe COPD, respectively, in the placebo group, and 4.5, 13.2, and 4.6 per 100 person-years in the patients with mild, moderate, and severe COPD, respectively, in the vaccine group (RR, 0.16 [p = 0.06]; vaccine effectiveness, 84%; RR, 0.55 [p = 0.5]; vaccine effectiveness, 45%; and RR, 0.15 [p = 0.04]; vaccine effectiveness, 85%, in the patients with mild, moderate, and severe COPD, respectively). Bivariate analysis revealed that the effectiveness of influenza vaccination was not modified by the severity of COPD, comorbid diseases, age, gender, or current smoking status. There was no difference in the incidence or severity of total ARI between the placebo group and the vaccine group.
                Influenza vaccination is highly effective in the prevention of influenza-related ARI regardless of the severity of COPD. Influenza vaccination does not prevent other ARIs unrelated to influenza. The effectiveness of influenza vaccination in the prevention of overall ARI in patients with COPD will depend on how much the proportion of influenza-related ARI contributes to the incidence of total ARI. Influenza vaccination should be recommended to all patients with COPD. The safety and immunogenicity of two recent cold-adapted reassortant influenza B viruses were evaluated in persons at high risk for influenza-related morbidity and mortality. Ambulatory adults > 65 years old or with chronic high-risk conditions were randomly assigned to receive parenteral trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine containing either influenza B/Ann Arbor/86 or B/Yamagata/88 hemagglutinin antigens, cold-adapted reassortant influenza B/Ann Arbor/1/86 or B/Yamagata/16/88 viruses (10(7.2) TCID50), or placebo in double-blind fashion. Cold-adapted vaccine viruses were well tolerated, with similar rates of respiratory symptoms in all groups. There were no changes in spirometry or oxygen saturation following vaccination. Immune responses to both types of vaccine were modest, with serum antibody responses occurring significantly more frequently and with higher magnitude in those receiving inactivated than in those receiving cold-adapted vaccine. Cold-adapted, reassortant influenza B vaccines are safe in the elderly and those with chronic illness but are not optimally immunogenic in this group. To assess the frequency and type of side effects after influenza vaccination in elderly people.
                Randomised double blind placebo controlled study.
                15 general practices in the southern Netherlands.
                1806 patients aged 60 or older, of whom 904 received influenza vaccine and 902 placebo.
                Adverse reactions reported on postal questionnaire completed four weeks after vaccination.
                210 (23%) patients given vaccine reported one or more adverse reactions compared with 127 (14%) given placebo. The frequency of local adverse reactions were 17.5% in the vaccine group and 7.3% in the placebo group (p < 0.001). There was no difference in systemic adverse reactions (11% v 9.4%; p = 0.34). In general, men reported fewer side effects than women.
                Only local side effects were more common in vaccinated patients and all side effects were mild. To determine the efficacy of influenza vaccination in elderly people.
                Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.
                Fifteen family practices in the Netherlands during influenza season 1991-1992.
                A total of 1838 subjects aged 60 years or older, not known as belonging to those high-risk groups in which vaccination was previously given.
                Purified split-virion vaccine containing A/Singapore/6/86(H1N1), A/Beijing/353/89(H3N2), B/Beijing/1/87, and B/Panama/45/90 (n = 927) or intramuscular placebo containing physiological saline solution (n = 911).
                Patients presenting with influenzalike illness up to 5 months after vaccination; self-reported influenza in postal questionnaires 10 weeks and 5 months after vaccination; serological influenza (fourfold increase of antibody titer between 3 weeks and 5 months after vaccination).
                The incidence of serological influenza was 4% in the vaccine group and 9% in the placebo group (relative risk [RR], 0.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.61). The incidences of clinical influenza were 2% and 3%, respectively (RR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.73). The effect was strongest for the combination of serological and clinical influenza (RR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.74). The effect was less pronounced for self-reported influenza.
                In the elderly, influenza vaccination may halve the incidence of serological and clinical influenza (in periods of antigenic drift). To evaluate the efficacy of adding intranasal live attenuated cold-adapted influenza A vaccine to inactivated influenza vaccine to prevent influenza A in elderly residents of long-term-care institutions.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted over 3 years.
                Three large nursing homes.
                A total of 523 residents of nursing homes (mean age, 84.2 years).
                All participants received trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine parenterally and were randomly assigned to receive either live attenuated influenza A (H3N2) virus vaccine or placebo intranasally.
                Laboratory-documented influenza A was defined as a respiratory illness plus isolation of influenza A virus from nasal secretions, significant serologic response, or both. Participants were considered to have been exposed to influenza A if they resided in an institution in which cases of influenza A were documented. Outbreak-associated illnesses were defined as those occurring between the first and last isolation of influenza virus from within the institution, +/- 3 days.
                Participants who received intranasal vaccine and were subsequently exposed to influenza A had significantly lower rates of laboratory-documented influenza A (9 of 162 vaccine recipients compared with 24 of 169 placebo recipients; vaccine protective efficacy, 60.6%; 95% CI, 18% to 82%), outbreak-associated respiratory illnesses (13 of 162 vaccine recipients compared with 34 of 169 placebo recipients; vaccine protective efficacy, 56.8%; CI 23% to 76%), and outbreak-associated influenza-like illnesses (6 of 162 vaccine recipients compared with 18 of 169 placebo recipients; vaccine protective efficacy, 65.0%; CI 17% to 86%).
                Intranasal immunization with live attenuated influenza A virus vaccine provided additional protection against influenza A when added to parenteral trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine among elderly nursing home residents.
It appears, from the limited number of studies performed, that inactivated vaccine reduces exacerbations in COPD patients. The size of effect was similar to that seen in large observational studies, and was due to a reduction in exacerbations occurring three or more weeks after vaccination, and due to influenza. There is a mild increase in transient local adverse effects with vaccination, but no evidence of an increase in early exacerbations.