Education of adult patients at an "asthma school": effects on quality of life, knowledge and need for nursing. Educating asthmatic patients in primary care: a pilot study of small group education. International guidelines and educational experiences in an out-patient clinic for asthma. The economics of an intensive education programme for asthmatic patients: a prospective controlled trial. Patients' perceptions compared with objective ratings of asthma severity. Comparison of effects of a self management booklet and audiocassette for patients with asthma. Videotape educational program for people with asthma. Controlled evaluation of the effects of patient education on asthma morbidity in general practice. Computer education for asthmatics: what effects? Education for self-treatment by adult asthmatics. The cost and effectiveness of an education program for adults who have asthma.
The effect of education of adult asthma patients at a special "asthma school" was studied with regard to knowledge of the disease and its treatment and quality of life measured by leisure activities, social interaction and psychological well being. We also studied if there were any differences in number of days in hospital and emergency visits before and one year after the asthma-school. Patients were randomised to an intervention group (7 men and 13 women) and a control group (7 men and 11 women). The age-range was 22-66 yrs. Both groups answered the same standardized and quantified questionnaires on three occasions, before the start of the asthma school, after five months and after twelve months. Both groups increased their knowledge of the disease and how to treat it, with slightly better results in the intervention group. The self-assessments all showed that patients in the intervention group felt better than those in the control group. The number of days in hospital as well as acute visits to out patients clinics were reduced significantly after the asthma school. The intervention did not influence spirometric variables. Patient education is an important part of asthma management. Individual education is usually used for this task. The object of this study was to assess whether another educational technique, educating patients in small groups, would be as effective and as acceptable as individual counselling in improving knowledge about asthma. A specially designed questionnaire was used to assess knowledge and other variables before and after education. Thirty-four patients were educated individually and 34 patients were educated in small groups. There were significant improvements in knowledge scores after both types of education. However group education took 4.5 hours for 34 patients whereas individual counselling took 14.25 hours for the same number. The results of this study suggest that educating patients in small groups is as effective as individual counselling in improving knowledge of asthma, is acceptable to patients and takes much less time. In June 1989, an out-patient clinic for asthma was instituted at Crema Hospital, Italy. Up to November 1994, 430 adult asthmatics were recruited, classified and managed according to the recommendations of the international guidelines. The aims of this study are to verify: 1) whether the organization of the clinic could maintain asthma under control and reduce hospital admissions; and 2) whether the traditional educational approach could be implemented by lessons in the school of asthma to improve the control of asthma symptoms and/or admissions. The data reported refer to the first 360 asthmatics attending the clinic between 1989 and 1994: 53, 45 and 2% of them were suffering from extrinsic, intrinsic and occupational asthma, respectively. On recruitment, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was < 80% of predicted in 170 patients, and arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) 8.0 kPa (< 60 mmHg) in 27 patients. After the admission visit, 190 patients (53%) were classified as mild, 97 (27%) as moderate, and 73 (20%) as severe asthmatics. In May 1993, a school of asthma was organized. Forty four patients were recruited, stratified according to the severity of their asthma and randomized into two groups: 22 patients attended the school, and 22 patients did not. Each group consisted of 5, 10 and 7 patients with mild, moderate and severe asthma, respectively. The school comprised four lessons twice a week. One year after the end of the school, we could find no differences between the two groups (school versus controls) with regard to the number of urgent care visits (9 vs 9), scheduled visits (22 vs 21) and hospital admissions (2 vs 2). The costs and benefits of a planned patient education programme for patients with asthma were evaluated in a controlled trial. The patient education group received a planned patient education programme, performed by a physician, a pharmacist and a nurse over a 6-month period. Changes in the use of resources, productive output and in health status were measured for the patient education group and the control group. The total cost for planning, implementation and evaluation of the programme was 14074 British pounds sterling. The patient education group increased its contacts to general practitioners and the extra costs totalled 252 British pounds sterling. The increased costs of drugs used by the patient education group in the 6-month period was 2313 British pounds sterling compared with costs in the control group. The number of days lost through sickness decreased in the patient education group, corresponding to a 4528 British pounds sterling saving of otherwise lost earnings. The quality of life increased in the patient education group by 3.2 points on the Psychosomatic Discomfort Scale (2.9%). Health status increased by 38.9%. The study shows that the patient education programme has a positive clinical effect on the patient's quality of life and health status. The economic consequences of the implementation programme depend on the specific setup of the local healthcare system, where the programme is applied. Optimal asthma management requires accurate assessment of asthma severity.
                To compare patients' perceptions of their asthma severity with that obtained by using the guidelines published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program's Expert Panel and with functional impairment measured by spirometry and numeric criteria of the American Thoracic Society.
                We enrolled 323 patients age 18 to 50 years who were members of the Kaiser Foundation Health Plan for > or = 1 year in a randomized control trial of an asthma education program. Each had a confirmed diagnosis of bronchial asthma and had been receiving antiasthma medication for > or = 1 year. Patients rated the severity of their asthma. Office spirometry was performed, and, using the Mini-Wright peak flow meter, patients kept 2-week diaries of at-home recordings of morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates.
                A statistically significant association was noted between patients' perceptions of asthma severity and both medication severity rating (P < .001) and diurnal variation rating (P = .003) and evening peak expiratory flow rate percentage (P = .019). In comparison with a severity composite based on criteria of the National Asthma Education Program, 54% of patients accurately estimated asthma severity, 27% overestimated, and 20% underestimated severity.
                A clinically significant proportion of asthmatic patients substantially underestimate disease severity and thereby may be at risk of increased mortality or morbidity. The effects on self management of asthma of a specially prepared book and audiocassette tape with similar contents were observed in a controlled study of 177 patients with asthma in general practice. After a run in period of six months patients were randomly given the book, the tape, both the book and tape, or neither. Patients' knowledge of the use of drugs, perceptions of their disability, skill in using an inhaler, consumption of drugs, consultations with their general practitioners, morbidity (from patients' entries on diary cards), and use of the educational material were measured. Knowledge about the use of drugs was significantly increased in the groups who received the material after three months and persisted after 12 months. Patients who had been given the tape or the book and tape increased their scores of knowledge of drugs more than patients given the book alone. Patients in all groups given the material considered that their disability was reduced. There were no other significant changes. Patients given both the book and the tape preferred the book. Patients with asthma can obtain useful information from such material. The paradoxical result whereby patients learnt more from the tape but preferred the book suggests that a distinction can be made between information that patients need, which may be acquired better from an audiocassette, and information that they want, which may be acquired better from a book. A videotape educational program was produced for use in adults with asthma. The program provided an overview of lung function, the physiologic abnormalities and treatment of asthma, and the approach to common problems encountered by the patients. Its benefits were examined in a randomized controlled study. The efficacy of the program in 62 patients whose mean duration of illness was 17 years was assessed by comparing the level of knowledge of the experimental group immediately after viewing the tape with that of the controls, who had not seen it; the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group. Retention of knowledge attributed to the program was assessed after a mean interval of 16 months. The knowledge test score of the experimental group was found to have decreased to the level of the control group. The main areas in which the experimental group lost knowledge were self-care and drug therapy for asthma. The medical status of the two groups did not change appreciably over the period of the study. Two different patient education programmes for asthma in general practice were evaluated in a controlled trial. Knowledge, self management, and morbidity due to asthma were assessed in 339 patients by means of a questionnaire. One group then received a maximum education programme, a second group received a limited education programme, and a third acted as a control group. 274 patients were reassessed after one 1 year. In both the intervention groups, understanding of asthma was greater after the trial. Only in the maximum intervention group was a significant improvement in knowledge of asthma shown. Neither group showed any change in self-management ability or asthma morbidity that differed significantly from changes in the control group. These simple informational education programmes were ineffective when applied to a general practice population. Further studies of factors affecting attitudes, beliefs, and actions are needed to improve the advice and support given to asthma patients. nan A prospective experimental design evaluated the ability of a series of educational and motivational interventions to enhance self-treatment by adult asthmatics and to reduce use of emergency department services for asthma attacks. After treatment for an asthma attack, subjects were randomly assigned to the following sequential interventions: (1) reinforcement by interpersonal similarity at the time of the emergency visit, (2) recepit of positive written appeals, and (3) follow-up telephone reinforcement. The asthmatic nurse educator was generally more effective in achieving short-term reduction of emergency department visits. Although the usefulness of the positive written appeal increased when employed by the asthmatic nurse, there were no substantive independent effects of the written message on emergency department use. To determine whether a self-management training program decreases emergency department visits and reduces costs for patients with asthma.
                Randomized controlled trial of an educational program.
                Two sites--an urban emergency room and a suburban emergency room.
                241 asthma patients between the ages of 18 and 70 years. Of the 119 patients in the intervention group and the 122 in the control group, 185 (76%) were available for follow-up.
                All patients seen in the emergency departments were given usual medical care and follow-up. Patients in the intervention group were asked to attend three educational sessions on asthma conducted by a specially trained RN. The program stressed importance of medication compliance, methods to control and prevent attacks, effects of drugs and rationale for their use, relaxation exercises, and smoking cessation.
                All patients received telephone interviews four, eight, and 12 months after entry into the study. Reports based on hospital admissions and emergency room utilization were verified by billing records. Three patients died during the study, none from asthma-related problems. The intervention group had significantly fewer asthma-related emergency visits (16 visits per 100 persons) than did the control group (39 per 100 persons); p = 0.0005 for the 12 months of follow-up. The effect of the intervention on asthma-related emergency department visits was strongest during the initial four months postintervention (68 per 100 persons versus 220 per 100 persons, p = 0.003). The financial analysis showed that the $85/person cost for the educational sessions was offset by the $628/person reduction in emergency room charges.
                Education enables patients with asthma to decrease utilization of emergency services.