Cisapride 20 mg b.i.d. provides symptomatic relief of heartburn and related symptoms of chronic mild to moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease. CIS-USA-52 Investigator Group. Efficacy of rabeprazole in the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Heartburn treatment in primary care: randomised, double blind study for 8 weeks. Heartburn without oesophagitis: efficacy of omeprazole therapy and features determining therapeutic response. Efficacy and safety of pantoprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. Treatment of non-erosive reflux disease with a proton pump inhibitor in Chinese patients: a randomized controlled trial. Randomised controlled trial of pantoprazole versus ranitidine for the treatment of uninvestigated heartburn in primary care. Heartburn-dominant, uninvestigated dyspepsia: a comparison of 'PPI-start' and 'H2-RA-start' management strategies in primary care--the CADET-HR Study. Treating the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a double-blind comparison of omeprazole and cisapride. Cimetidine suspension in patients with stage 0 gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Famotidine relieves symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease and heals erosions and ulcerations. Results of a multicenter, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. USA Merck Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Study Group. Symptom-relieving effect of esomeprazole 40 mg daily in patients with heartburn. Cimetidine, metoclopramide, or placebo in the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Omeprazole as a diagnostic tool in gastroesophageal reflux disease. Cimetidine in the treatment of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux: a double blind controlled trial. Clinical trial: the effects of the proton pump inhibitor dexlansoprazole MR on daytime and nighttime heartburn in patients with non-erosive reflux disease. Esomeprazole resolves chronic heartburn in patients without erosive oesophagitis. Ranitidine therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Results of a large double-blind trial. Famotidine vs. omeprazole: a prospective randomized multicentre trial to determine efficacy in non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Omeprazole 10 milligrams once daily, omeprazole 20 milligrams once daily, or ranitidine 150 milligrams twice daily, evaluated as initial therapy for the relief of symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in general practice. Clinical effectiveness and quality of life with ranitidine vs placebo in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients: a clinical experience network (CEN) study. Symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: double blind controlled study of intermittent treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine. The European Study Group. Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care: an international study of different treatment strategies with omeprazole. International GORD Study Group. Efficacy and safety of omeprazole in Japanese patients with nonerosive reflux disease. A controlled trial of metoclopramide in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux. Omeprazole is more effective than cimetidine for the relief of all grades of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-associated heartburn, irrespective of the presence or absence of endoscopic oesophagitis. Reflux symptom relief with omeprazole in patients without unequivocal oesophagitis. Double-blind crossover study of ranitidine and placebo in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Lansoprazole compared with ranitidine for the treatment of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of symptomatic acid reflux disease without esophagitis. Gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms--clinical findings and effect of ranitidine treatment.
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a twice-daily dosage regimen of cisapride 20 mg in relieving the symptoms of mild-moderate gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients with moderate intensity heartburn and no history of erosive esophagitis.
                After a 2-wk, single-blind, placebo run-in period, 398 patients who continued to experience moderate intensity heartburn were randomized to either placebo (n = 196) or cisapride 20 mg (n = 202) twice daily for 4 wk.
                Compared with placebo, cisapride significantly reduced scores for daytime and nighttime heartburn (p < 0.001), total regurgitation (p < 0.001), eructation (p = 0.04), and early satiety (p = 0.04). Cisapride 20 mg b.i.d. was also superior to placebo in reducing total use of rescue antacid medication (p < 0.001); reducing, in concordance analyses, daytime and nighttime heartburn with antacid usage (p < 0.001); increasing the percentage of heartburn-free days and antacid-free nights (p < 0.5); and increasing the percentage of patients self-rated as having minimal or better symptomatic improvement (p = 0.01). Cisapride 20 mg b.i.d. was well tolerated. The most common adverse event in the cisapride group was diarrhea, reported by 10% of patients, compared with an incidence of 4% in the placebo group.
                Cisapride 20 mg b.i.d. was shown to be effective and safe for the short-term treatment of daytime and nighttime heartburn and for other symptoms associated with mild-moderate GERD. The purpose of this study was to assess the rapidity of symptom relief and 4-week efficacy of rabeprazole 20 mg in patients with moderately severe nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. Data were analyzed from 2 similarly designed, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, U.S. trials. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients (N = 261) were randomized to 4 weeks of rabeprazole 20 mg once daily or placebo. Patients kept symptom diaries and scored symptom severity. Median time to first 24-hour heartburn-free interval was 3.5 days for the rabeprazole group compared with 19.5 days for the placebo group (P < or = .0002). Complete heartburn relief at week 4 was 32% with rabeprazole and 3.8% with placebo (P < or = .001). Rabeprazole also significantly improved other GERD-associated symptoms (e.g., regurgitation, belching, early satiety) by week 4 compared with placebo (P < or = .05). Rabeprazole provides fast and potent relief from heartburn and other symptoms of nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. To compare the effects and tolerability of omeprazole and cisapride with that of placebo for control of heartburn in primary care patients.
                Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study. Setting: 65 primary care practices in Norway.
                483 untreated patients with complaints of heartburn >/=3 days a week, with at most grade 1 reflux oesophagitis.
                Omeprazole 20 mg once daily, cisapride 20 mg twice daily, or placebo for 8 weeks.
                Adequate control of heartburn, defined as </=1 day of the past 7 days with no more than mild heartburn, after 4 weeks of treatment.
                In the all patients treated analysis, adequate control of heartburn was achieved in 71% of patients taking omeprazole, 22% taking cisapride, and 18% taking placebo after 4 weeks of treatment (omeprazole v cisapride and placebo, P<0.0001; cisapride v placebo, non-significant). Results were comparable in patients with or without reflux oesophagitis. In patients treated with omeprazole only, symptom control was achieved significantly more often in patients positive for Helicobacter pylori. Antacid use was 2-3 times greater in patients taking cisapride or placebo than in those taking omeprazole. Relief of non-reflux symptoms did not significantly differ between the three groups. Significantly more patients taking cisapride reported adverse events than those taking omeprazole or placebo.
                Omeprazole 20 mg once daily was highly effective in relieving heartburn whereas cisapride 20 mg twice daily was not significantly more effective than placebo. Data are limited on the value of effective antisecretory therapy in the relief of heartburn in patients without oesophagitis.
                Patients with heartburn, without endoscopic signs of oesophagitis, were randomized to double-blind treatment with omeprazole, 20 or 10 mg once daily, or placebo, for 4 weeks (n = 509). Pre-treatment oesophageal acid exposure was assessed using 24-h intra-oesophageal pH monitoring. Heartburn was assessed at 2 and 4 weeks.
                At 4 weeks the proportion of patients with complete absence of heartburn was 46% (95% confidence interval, 39-53%) with 20 mg omeprazole, 31% (25-38%) with 10 mg omeprazole, and 13% (7-20%) with placebo. Satisfaction with therapy was reported by 66%, 57%, and 31% of the patients, respectively.
                Omeprazole, 20 and 10 mg once daily, provides rapid relief of heartburn in patients without endoscopic oesophagitis. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent disease associated with a high symptom burden and a reduced quality of life. This multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared relief from key GERD symptoms (heartburn, acid eructation, and pain on swallowing) and from other gastrointestinal symptoms (epigastric pain, vomiting, nausea, flatulence, retching, and retrosternal feeling of tightness) and safety profiles of the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole and the H2 antagonist ranitidine in patients suffering from symptomatic GERD.
                The patients [338 intention-to-treat (ITT) population; 284 per-protocol (PP) population] received 20 mg pantoprazole (once daily in the morning) plus ranitidine placebo (once daily in the evening; ITT n = 167, PP n = 136) or pantoprazole placebo (once daily in the morning) plus 300 mg ranitidine (once daily in the evening; ITT n = 171, PP n = 148) for 28 days. The primary efficacy criterion (ITT and PP populations) was relief from key GERD symptoms (heartburn, acid eructation, and pain on swallowing) after 28 days of treatment. Secondary criteria (PP) included relief from key GERD symptoms on day 14, relief from all gastrointestinal symptoms on days 14 and 28, and relief from key GERD symptoms on days 14 and 28. Safety evaluations included adverse events and laboratory assessments.
                Significantly more pantoprazole-treated patients were free from key GERD symptoms at day 28 (68.3%, n = 114) as compared with ranitidine-treated patients (43.3%, n = 74; 95% confidence interval for odds ratio 1.84-4.51). Pantoprazole was also significantly more efficacious in controlling all gastrointestinal symptoms of GERD. By day 28, 51.5% (n = 70) of the pantoprazole-treated patients were completely symptom free versus 31.1% (n = 46) of the ranitidine-treated patients (95% confidence interval for odds ratio 1.45-3.83). Both treatments were well tolerated.
                Pantoprazole is significantly superior to ranitidine in the treatment of key and associated gastrointestinal symptoms of GERD and is well tolerated. Evidence suggests that rates of gastroesophageal reflux disease are increasing in the Asia-Pacific region, where patients tend to have predominantly non-erosive reflux disease as opposed to erosive (reflux) esophagitis. At present, data for the responsiveness of non-erosive reflux disease to proton pump inhibition are scant. We aimed to study esomeprazole for the treatment of non-erosive reflux disease in Chinese patients.
                Patients with a clinical diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, and a locally validated reflux index, the Chinese GerdQ, of equal to or greater than 12 were recruited and randomized to receive esomeprazole 20 mg daily or placebo for 8 weeks. Reflux index scores, quality of life (SF-36), and the hospital anxiety and depression (HAD) scale and symptom relief were evaluated before, during, and after treatment.
                A total of 175 patients were randomized. Patients in the esomeprazole group (n = 85) demonstrated statistically significant reductions in their GerdQ index, from 19.45 to 15.37 and to 14.32 (p = 0.013, p = 0.005) at weeks 4 and 8, respectively. Compared to placebo at week 8, 57.1% of patients on esomeprazole found that their symptoms had resolved or were acceptable compared with 37.2% in the placebo group (p = 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in overall quality-of-life measures or the HAD scale related to treatment.
                This study suggests that esomeprazole is efficacious in treating Chinese patients with non-erosive reflux disease. To investigate whether pantoprazole (20 mg/d) produces significantly greater symptom control than ranitidine (300 mg/d) in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
                Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group comparison.
                76 general practices in north-west Sydney and Newcastle, New South Wales (Australia), from 19 January 1999 to 22 September 2000.
                307 patients aged 18 years or over presenting with symptomatic GORD.
                Pantoprazole (20 mg once daily) or ranitidine (150 mg twice daily).
                Patient-assessed frequency and severity of heartburn using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and a patient heartburn diary.
                Pantoprazole was associated with significantly higher rates of complete control of GORD symptoms than ranitidine at four weeks (40% v 19%; P < 0.001), eight weeks (55% v 33%; P < 0.001), six months (71% v 56%; P = 0.007) and 12 months (77% v 59%; P = 0.001).
                Low-dose pantoprazole is an effective alternative to standard-dose ranitidine for initial and maintenance treatment of patients with symptomatic GORD. There are few data on empiric, stepped therapy for heartburn relief or subsequent relapse in primary care.
                To compare heartburn relief produced by a proton pump inhibitor-start or an H(2)-receptor antagonist-start with step-up therapy, as needed, followed by a treatment-free period to assess relapse.
                Heartburn-dominant uninvestigated dyspepsia patients from 46 primary care centres were randomized to one of two active treatment strategies: omeprazole 20 mg daily (proton pump inhibitor-start) or ranitidine 150 mg bid (H2-receptor antagonist-start) for the first 4-8 weeks, stepping up to omeprazole 40 or 20 mg daily, respectively, for 4-8 weeks for persistent symptoms. Daily diaries documented heartburn relief (score < or = 3/7 on < or = of 7 prior days) and relapse (score > or = 4 on > or = 2 of 7 prior days).
                For 'proton pump inhibitor-start' (n = 196) vs. 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' (n = 194), respectively, heartburn relief occurred in 55.1% vs. 27.3% (P < 0.001) at 4 weeks and in 88.3% vs. 87.1% at 16 weeks. After therapy, 308 patients were heartburn-free (159 vs. 149); median times to relapse were 8 vs. 9 days and cumulative relapse rates were 78.6% vs. 75.8%, respectively.
                An empiric 'proton pump inhibitor-start' strategy relieves heartburn more effectively than an 'H2-receptor antagonist-start' strategy up to 12 weeks but has no effect on subsequent relapse, which is rapid in most patients. Few studies have specifically addressed the management of the symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, and there are no comparative data in this respect for acid pump inhibitors and prokinetic agents.
                Following endoscopy 424 patients presenting with heartburn as the predominant symptom of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease were randomized to treatment with omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily, or cisapride 10 mg four times daily, in a double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, multicentre study. Symptoms and quality of life were assessed at 4 weeks. Patients still experiencing heartburn continued therapy for a further 4 weeks and the assessments were repeated.
                At 4 weeks, heartburn was resolved in 65% (95% CI: 57-73%), 56% (48-64%) and 41% (32%-49%) of patients treated, respectively, with omeprazole 20 mg and 10 mg once daily, and cisapride. Both omeprazole doses were significantly more effective than cisapride (P < 0.01). The same order of efficacy was observed regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis. Regurgitation and epigastric pain also improved to a greater degree with omeprazole than with cisapride. Quality of life was improved in all treatment groups, and the improvement in the reflux dimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) score was significantly different between groups (P = 0.002).
                Omeprazole 20 or 10 mg once daily is significantly more effective than cisapride in the resolution of heartburn, regardless of the presence of erosive oesophagitis, and this is accompanied by an improvement in patient quality of life. One hundred and twenty-five patients with symptoms of heartburn and acid regurgitation but without endoscopic abnormalities were randomized to receive 200 mg cimetidine suspension four times daily or placebo for two weeks. Daily dairy cards were kept to evaluate the frequency and degree of symptoms. At two weeks cimetidine was significantly more effective than placebo. It is concluded that placebo suspension has a considerable effect on gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms, but cimetidine suspension provides significantly better relief. We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy of famotidine 40 mg administered at bedtime (HS), 20 mg given twice daily (BID), and placebo to relieve heartburn and to heal endoscopically documented esophageal erosions or ulcerations. A total of 338 patients were randomized: 135 to receive famotidine 40 mg HS, 137 to receive famotidine 20 mg BID, and 66 to receive placebo. In the group given famotidine 20 mg BID, there was a significantly greater proportion of patients with complete relief of daytime heartburn, and both famotidine groups demonstrated statistically significant advantages over placebo in global scores or by successful outcome. Antacid consumption was significantly reduced in the group given famotidine 20 mg BID as compared with placebo. Both famotidine regimens resulted in a significantly greater proportion of patients with complete endoscopic healing than placebo, with the BID dosing being numerically superior to the 40-mg HS dose. To assess symptom relief in patients with heartburn following treatment with esomeprazole 40 mg daily.
                Patients with heartburn (for > or = 6 months) were assessed in this double-blind, multicenter study. After a 3-day single-blind placebo run-in, 440 patients were randomized to esomeprazole 40 mg o.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 14 days. Heartburn symptoms were recorded daily; as insufficient patients had data available from days 13 and 14, analyses included data up to day 12. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was diagnosed by upper GI endoscopy and 24-h pH-monitoring. The primary end-point was total heartburn relief defined as no heartburn symptoms during the preceding 24-h period.
                240 patients had erosive esophagitis (EO) and 114 patients had GERD defined by pH-monitoring. Proportions of patients with total heartburn relief increased during the first days of treatment and stabilized after Day 4. Total heartburn relief occurred in 67%-73%, 62%-70%, and 21%-32% of patients in the esomeprazole 40 mg o.d., esomeprazole 20 mg b.i.d., and placebo groups, respectively, between days 6 and 12. Proportions of patients with total heartburn relief were higher in patients with EO (71%-80% of patients from Day 4 onwards) compared to those without EO (52%-67% of patients from Day 4 onwards). Figures for patients diagnosed by pH-monitoring were 65%-73% of those with a positive diagnosis and 51%-58% with a negative diagnosis.
                Esomeprazole 40 mg o.d. treatment produces total heartburn relief in a high proportion of patients with GERD. Once-daily esomeprazole 40 mg dosing is recommended as no advantage was gained by splitting the dose. nan To determine the diagnostic value of empirical treatment with omeprazole in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
                Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and 24-h esophageal pH monitoring. Patients with reflux esophagitis grade 0 or 1 were included in the study and were randomized to double-blind treatment with either 40 mg omeprazole or placebo o.m. The effect of treatment was evaluated after 1 and 2 wk with a symptom questionnaire with a four-grade Likert scale, and symptomatic response outcome was compared with the results of 24-h pH-metry.
                Ninety-eight patients were included; however, 13 were excluded from the final analysis because of protocol violation. Of the remaining 85 patients, 54 had no signs of esophagitis at endoscopy, and 31 had esophagitis grade 1. The pH registration showed pathological gastroesophageal reflux in 47 patients (55%). Forty-one patients were randomized to treatment with omeprazole and 44 to placebo. There was a significant correlation between the pH registration result and response to omeprazole (p = 0.04, chi2), but not to placebo (p = 0.16). With pH-metry as the gold standard, the omeprazole test had positive and negative predictive values of 68% and 63%, respectively, for the diagnosis of GERD. When the omeprazole test was used as the gold standard, the positive and negative predictive values of pH monitoring were 68 % and 63 %, respectively. Similar sensitivity was found when the pH-metry was compared with presence of esophagitis.
                Determination of the symptomatic response to 40 mg of omeprazole for 14 days is a simple and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis of GERD, with a sensitivity and specificity comparable to 24-h pH monitoring. The effectiveness of cimetidine for symptomatic relief in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux was studied in a multicenter, double blind clinical trial. Patients were entered into the study for a total of 8 weeks, receiving either cimetidine, 300 mg four times daily, or identical placebo tablets. Throughout the trial, frequent assessments were made of symptom severity and frequency, combined with careful measurement of antacid use. Esophagoscopy, esophageal acid sensitivity, and lower esophageal pressures were performed before and at the completion of the treatment period. Significant (P less than 0.05) decreases in symptom frequency and severity were noted throughout the study in the cimetidine-treated patients, as compared with the placebo group. This subjective improvement was corroborated by a concomitant decrease in antacid use, which was significantly (P less than 0.05) reduced in the cimetidine-treated group. In addition, significant improvement in esophageal acid sensitivity resulted from cimetidine therapy. No objective improvement in esophageal endoscopic appearance or sphincter pressures was noted. The results of this double blind trial indicate that cimetidine is more effective than the placebo for the relief of symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux. The proportion of patients who respond to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy is about 20% lower in those with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) than in those with erosive oesophagitis.
                To assess efficacy and safety of dexlansoprazole MR, a PPI using Dual Delayed Release technology, in NERD patients.
                In this 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 947 NERD patients randomly received dexlansoprazole MR 30 mg, 60 mg or placebo once daily (QD). The percentages of 24-h heartburn-free days (primary) and nights without heartburn (secondary) were assessed from patients' daily diaries. Investigators also assessed symptoms. Patients completed validated quality of life and symptom severity questionnaires.
                Dexlansoprazole MR provided significantly greater median percentages of 24-h heartburn-free days (54.9% and 50.0% for the 30- and 60-mg doses vs. 17.5% for placebo, P < 0.00001) and nights without heartburn (80.8% and 76.9% vs. 51.7%, P < 0.00001 vs. placebo). Dexlansoprazole MR also reduced symptom severity. Quality of life improvements in patients receiving dexlansoprazole MR were consistent with clinical efficacy endpoints. Percentages of patients experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events were similar among groups.
                Dexlansoprazole MR 30 and 60 mg were superior to placebo in providing 24-h heartburn-free days and nights in NERD patients. Treatment was well tolerated. Patients with chronic heartburn but with no endoscopic evidence of erosive oesophagitis require gastric acid suppression to relieve symptoms.
                To assess the efficacy and safety of esomeprazole in patients with frequent heartburn for >or = 6 months and no evidence of erosive oesophagitis on endoscopy.
                Two randomized, double-blind, 4-week, multi-centre trials with identical methodology compared once-daily esomeprazole, 40 mg (n = 241) or 20 mg (n = 234), with placebo (n = 242) for the rigorous end-point of complete resolution of heartburn. Secondary end-points included the percentage of heartburn-free days and the time to first and sustained resolution of heartburn.
                Patients treated with either dose of esomeprazole were two to three times more likely to achieve complete resolution of heartburn than patients treated with placebo (P < 0.001). The percentage of heartburn-free days was significantly higher with esomeprazole 40 mg (63%, 66%) or 20 mg (63%, 68%) than with placebo (46%, 36%; P < or = 0.001) in each of the two studies. Esomeprazole was associated with a significantly shorter mean time to first (6-7 days) and sustained (12-17 days) resolution of heartburn compared with placebo (first, 10-12 days; sustained, 21-22 days; P < or = 0.008). The spectrum and frequency of adverse events with esomeprazole were similar to those with placebo.
                Esomeprazole, at daily doses of 40 mg or 20 mg, is effective and safe for the treatment of chronic heartburn in patients without erosive oesophagitis. In a multicenter, double-blind trial, 284 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease were evaluated before, during, and after six weeks of treatment with either placebo or ranitidine (150 mg twice daily). Randomization resulted in two comparable patient groups. Ranitidine treatment was significantly more effective than placebo treatment in decreasing the frequency and the severity of heartburn during both daytime and nighttime assessment periods. There was a significant correlation between improvement in heartburn symptoms and decrease in antacid consumption; hence, patients receiving ranitidine consumed significantly fewer antacid tablets. Among patients with endoscopic esophagitis at baseline, the overall change in endoscopic classification after six weeks of therapy was significantly better for the ranitidine-treated patients. The ranitidine-treated group had less evidence of erosions and ulcerations as well as greater healing. There were no differences between the groups with respect to changes in esophageal mucosal sensitivity to acid perfusion or changes in histologic grading of esophageal mucosal biopsy specimens. The ranitidine safety profile was similar to that of previous studies. We conclude that, in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease, ranitidine therapy, 150 mg twice daily, markedly reduced the heartburn symptoms of reflux disease and significantly improved the endoscopic appearance of the esophageal mucosa. Several studies in Western countries showed that proton-pump inhibitors are superior to histamine2-receptor antagonists or placebo in the treatment of non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The efficacy of acid-suppressive drugs for non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in Japan, in which the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection is higher compared with Western countries, is unknown.
                To compare the efficacy of famotidine and omeprazole in Japanese patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease by a prospective randomized multicentre trial.
                A total of 98 patients received either famotidine 20 mg b.d. (n = 48) or omeprazole once daily (n = 50). Frequency of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms and health-related quality of life were evaluated at baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. Complete relief was defined as no gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms during the 7-day interval in week 4.
                Complete relief was achieved in 23 (48%) of patients receiving famotidine and 28 (56%) of patients treated with omeprazole. In the famotidine group, complete relief rate in H. pylori-negative patients was significantly lower than H. pylori-positive patients (35% vs. 64%). Both famotidine and omeprazole improved most scales of health-related quality of life. Omeprazole significantly improved reflux score irrespective of H. pylori infection while famotidine significantly improved reflux score in H. pylori-positive patients but not in H. pylori-negative patients.
                Omeprazole is more effective than famotidine for the control of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease symptoms in H. pylori-negative patients, while similar efficacy is observed in H. pylori-positive patients with non-erosive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. The efficacy of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis and the therapeutic advantages over the histamine H2 receptor antagonists are well documented. This study assessed 20 mg omeprazole daily (OM20), 10 mg omeprazole daily (OM10), and 150 mg ranitidine (RAN) twice daily for symptom relief in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD).
                Patients (n = 994) presenting with heartburn to their general practitioner underwent endoscopy to exclude peptic ulcer disease and were randomized into a UK, multicentre, parallel-group, double-blind comparison of the three treatments for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits after 2 and 4 weeks.
                Symptom relief after 4 weeks was achieved by 61% (OM20), 49% (OM10), and 40% (RAN) patients (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0167; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM10 versus RAN, P < 0.01). Among the patients (32%) with erosive reflux oesophagitis, symptom relief was achieved in 79% (OM20), 48% (OM10), and 33% (RAN) (OM20 versus OM10, P < 0.0001; OM20 versus RAN, P < 0.0001; OM1O versus RAN, NS).
                Omeprazole, 20 mg, is the most effective initial therapy for relief of GORD symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), often characterized as heartburn, is a highly common presenting complaint to family physicians. This study is the first large, prospective, nationwide family practice outpatient evaluation of the effectiveness of the histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist ranitidine as medical therapy for this disorder.
                This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, 6-week study was designed to evaluate the effect of ranitidine on clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients with GERD. Eligible patients included those who were at least 18 years old and had at least a 3-month history of heartburn or heartburn therapy and a minimum of 4 days with at least one heart-burn episode in the week preceding the baseline visit. Quality-of-life effects were measured using a general health status instrument and a previously validated heartburn-specific questionnaire.
                Ranitidine treatment conferred clinically and statistically significant reductions in mean heartburn pain scores within the first 24 hours (P < or = .001) and mean number of heartburn episodes within the first 48 hours (P < or = .001). These reductions were maintained throughout the 6-week trial, during both daytime and nighttime. Compared with patients receiving placebo, patients treated with ranitidine also used significantly fewer doses of antacids (P < or = .003). Further, both ranitidine-treated patients' and their physicians' global assessments of decreases in heartburn severity, as well as clinical improvement on ranitidine, proved superior to those of controls (P < or = .001). The rate of adverse events associated with ranitidine and placebo was low and similar. Ranitidine-treated patients had more favorable scores on the general health status dimensions of physical functioning, bodily pain, and vitality (P < .05), and more favorable scores on all dimensions of the heartburn-specific questionnaire (P < .05).
                Twice-daily treatment with ranitidine 150 mg is a valuable therapy for GERD in a typical family practice setting. It reduces the frequency and severity of symptoms within the first 24 to 48 hours of treatment and diminishes the use of nonprescription antacids while improving the quality of life as measured by both a general health status instrument and a disease-specific instrument. To assess intermittent treatment over 12 months in patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
                Randomised, multicentre, double blind, controlled study. Patients with heartburn and normal endoscopy results or mild erosive changes received omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily for 2 weeks. Patients remaining symptomatic had omeprazole 10 mg or ranitidine dose doubled for another 2 weeks while omeprazole 20 mg was continued for 2 weeks. Patients who were symptomatic or mildly symptomatic were followed up for 12 months. Recurrences of moderate or severe heartburn during follow up were treated with the dose which was successful for initial symptom control.
                Hospitals and primary care practices between 1994 and 1996.
                677 patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
                Total time off active treatment, time to failure of intermittent treatment, and outcomes ranked from best to worst.
                704 patients were randomised, 677 were eligible for analyses; 318 reached the end of the study with intermittent treatment without recourse to maintenance antisecretory drugs. The median number of days off active treatment during follow up was 142 for the entire study (281 for the 526 patients who reached a treatment related end point). Thus, about half the patients did not require treatment for at least 6 months, and this was similar in all three treatment groups. According to outcome, 378 (72%) patients were in the best outcome ranks (no relapse or one (or more) relapse but in remission until 12 months); 630 (93%) had three or fewer relapses in the intermittent treatment phase. Omeprazole 20 mg provided faster relief of heartburn. The results were similar in patients with erosive and non-erosive disease.
                Intermittent treatment is effective in managing symptoms of heartburn in half of patients with uncomplicated gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is simple and applicable in general practice, where most patients are seen. To assess the efficacy of omeprazole in patients presenting with troublesome reflux symptoms.
                Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled comparison.
                Primary care.
                Patients were recruited using a symptom-based questionnaire for diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.
                After endoscopy, patients without endoscopic oesophagitis were randomized to omeprazole 20 mg (Ome20), omeprazole 10 mg (Ome10) or placebo once daily for 4 weeks (n = 261) and those with oesophagitis (except circumferential/ulcerative) were randomized to receive either Ome20 or Ome10 once daily for 4 weeks (n = 277). Patients not symptom-free at 4 weeks received open treatment with Ome20 once daily for a further 4 weeks. Those symptom-free at 4-8 weeks were followed up for 6 months off treatment, to see whether their symptoms recurred.
                Complete upper GI symptom relief during week 4 on Ome20 or Ome10 in patients with or without endoscopic oesophagitis.
                Forty one percent of all patients on Ome20 and 35% on Ome10 reported complete relief from upper GI symptoms during week 4, whilst 73% of the patients on Ome20 and 62% on Ome10 obtained sufficient control. Complete relief during week 4 was reported by 19% of endoscopy-negative patients on placebo, and sufficient control by 35%. Endoscopic healing at 4 weeks occurred in 76% of oesophagitis patients on Ome20 and in 56% on Ome10. After 6 months off treatment, 90% of patients with oesophagitis and 75% of endoscopy-negative patients reported symptomatic relapse.
                Both 10 mg and 20 mg of omeprazole gave effective relief of symptoms, although 20 mg gave superior healing in patients with oesophagitis. After cessation of treatment, symptomatic relapse was rapid and frequent in both endoscopy-positive and endoscopy-negative patients. There is increasing awareness of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) as a disease requiring treatment in Japan. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and safety of omeprazole 10 mg and 20 mg once daily in Japanese patients with NERD.
                Patients with heartburn for at least 2 days a week during the month before entry into the study and no endoscopic signs of a mucosal break (grade M or N according to Hoshihara's modification of the Los Angeles classification) were randomly assigned to one of three groups (omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo) once daily for 4 weeks.
                Overall, 355 patients were enrolled, of whom 284 were randomly assigned to one of the three groups (omeprazole 10 mg, n = 96; omeprazole 20 mg, n = 93; placebo, n = 95). The rate of complete resolution of heartburn in week 4 was significantly higher in patients treated with omeprazole 10 mg [32.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 22.9%-41.6%] or 20 mg (25.8%, 95% CI, 16.9%-34.7%) than in the placebo group (12.0%, 95% CI, 5.3%-18.6%). No significant difference between the two omeprazole groups was observed. The rate of complete resolution of heartburn by omeprazole was similar between patients with grade M and those with grade N esophagus. Omeprazole also increased the rate of sufficient relief from heartburn. Omeprazole was well tolerated.
                Omeprazole 10 mg or 20 mg once daily is effective and well tolerated in patients with NERD regardless of their endoscopic classification. Since metoclopramide increases lower-esophageal-sphincter pressure in patients with gastroesophageal reflux, we compared the effects of metoclopramide, 10 mg four times daily, with those of placebo on symptoms in 31 patients with chronic heartburn. Eighteen patients completed a random-order, double-blind crossover study of two consecutive eight-week periods. The final 13 patients crossed over only if their symptoms were not substantially improved after the first eight weeks. Response of low-esophageal-sphincter pressure to metoclopramide did not correlate significantly with symptomatic improvement. After the metoclopramide treatment period, mean basal pressure was unchanged from values before study. In both treatment periods, metoclopramide-treated patients had significantly more symptomatic improvement than the control group (P less than 0.05). Previous studies have demonstrated greater efficacy for omeprazole compared with cimetidine in patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis, but excluded the substantial group of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with reflux symptoms but without endoscopic abnormality. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared omeprazole and cimetidine in the treatment of GERD-associated heartburn both in patients with symptomatic non-ulcerative oesophagitis and in those with heartburn but without oesophagitis.
                A total of 221 patients with heartburn and oesophageal mucosa grade 0 (normal, n = 51), 1 (no macroscopic erosions, n = 52), 2 (isolated erosions, n = 97) or 3 (confluent erosions, n = 21) were randomized to receive double-blind either omeprazole 20 mg daily or cimetidine 400 mg q.d.s. for a period of 4 weeks. Those still symptomatic after 4 weeks of treatment received omeprazole 20 mg daily for a further 4 weeks.
                There was no correlation between severity of heartburn and endoscopic grade at entry (correlation coefficient = 0.196). After 4 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in whom heartburn was controlled (no more than mild symptoms on no more than 1 day in the previous 7) on omeprazole (66%; 74/112) was more than double that on cimetidine (31%; 34/109) (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the relief of heartburn in the 47% of patients without unequivocal oesophagitis (endoscopic grade 0 or 1) and in the 53% of patients with erosive oesophagitis (grade 2 or 3) (P = 0.31). Only treatment with omeprazole (P < 0.0001) and lower severity of heartburn at entry (P < 0.01) were significant in predicting heartburn relief. Amongst those patients requiring an additional 4 weeks of treatment with omeprazole, 67% (54/81) reported that their heartburn was controlled after 8 weeks of treatment.
                We conclude that omeprazole is superior to cimetidine for the relief of all grades of heartburn in GERD, whether or not the patient has unequivocal endoscopic oesophagitis. As many as 50% of patients with reflux symptoms have no endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis. This multicentre study was designed to assess symptom relief after omeprazole 20 mg once daily in patients with symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease but without endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis.
                Patients (n = 209) were randomized in a double-blind study to receive either omeprazole 20 mg once daily (n = 98) or placebo (n = 111) for 4 weeks. Symptoms were assessed at clinic visits and using daily diary cards, with patient-completed questionnaires providing additional data on symptoms and on psychological disturbance.
                On completion, symptom relief favoured omeprazole: 57% of patients on omeprazole were free of heartburn (vs. 19% on placebo), 75% were free of regurgitation (47%) and 43% were completely asymptomatic (14%), each with P < 0.0001. Fewer patients in the omeprazole group required alginate/antacid relief medication (P < 0.05). Symptom relief (time to first heartburn-free day) was more rapid with omeprazole (2 vs. 5 days on placebo; P < 0.01). A greater reduction in anxiety occurred in the omeprazole group (P < 0.05).
                Omeprazole 20 mg once daily is effective in providing relief of the symptoms typical of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with essentially normal oesophageal mucosa. The effect of 150 mg ranitidine twice daily was compared with placebo by the double-blind crossover technique (8 weeks twice) in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux (paired comparison in 38 patients). Ranitidine was superior to placebo with regard to effect on symptoms, improvement of oesophagitis as assessed by endoscopy and biopsy, and decrease of oesophageal acid hypersensitivity. The symptomatic response to ranitidine was, however, unsatisfactory in more than half of the cases. When symptomatic responders taking ranitidine (R) were compared with non-responders (NR), there was no difference with regard to the severity of oesophagitis or frequency of positive acid perfusion tests before or after the 8-week treatment. NR were younger and more often had endoscopic signs of incompetence of the cardia and gastric prolapse. Ranitidine is an efficient drug in patients with reflux disease. It cannot be expected that mechanical problems in the hiatal region will be influenced by ranitidine, which is probably why half the patients did not respond. Traditionally, proton pump inhibitors are used primarily for patients with esophagitis. However, patients with nonerosive reflux disease may also benefit from these powerful medications.
                To compare the safety and symptom relief efficacy of lansoprazole with ranitidine therapy and with placebo.
                In 2 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials of 901 patients with symptomatic reflux disease, which was confirmed by endoscopy to be nonerosive, received lansoprazole, 15 or 30 mg once daily; ranitidine, 150 mg twice daily; or placebo for 8 weeks.
                Analysis of daily diary data during the first 4 weeks and for the entire 8 weeks of treatment revealed that patients who were treated with either dosage of lansoprazole reported significantly (P<.05) lower percentages of days and nights with heartburn, less pain severity of both day and night heartburn, fewer days of antacid use, and smaller amounts of antacid use compared with patients who were treated with ranitidine or placebo. The incidence of possible or probable treatment-related adverse reactions was comparable among the treatment groups; abdominal pain and diarrhea were the most commonly reported adverse events. No statistically significant differences were noted between treatment groups in laboratory analyses.
                Lansoprazole therapy is more effective than standard dosages of ranitidine or placebo in relieving symptoms in patients with endoscopically confirmed non-erosive reflux esophagitis. Up to three quarters of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) have symptoms, such as heartburn, but no macroscopic evidence of erosive esophagitis, making symptomatic GERD a common clinical problem in the primary care setting.
                To compare the efficacy and safety of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; and placebo in the treatment of symptomatic GERD without erosive esophagitis.
                Patients with a history of heartburn (> or =12 months) and episodes of moderate to severe heartburn on 4 or more of the 7 days before endoscopy were eligible to participate in this 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The absence of erosive esophagitis was established through endoscopy. Eligible patients were randomized to 1 of 3 treatment groups: omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; omeprazole, 10 mg once daily; or placebo. Patients were assessed at weeks 2 and 4. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of heartburn was determined mainly through the following diary card data: daily resolution of heartburn and complete resolution of heartburn every day during 1 week of treatment. The efficacy of omeprazole for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea was also assessed.
                Of 359 randomized patients, 355 were included in the statistical analysis (intention-to-treat population). Daily proportions of patients with no heartburn were consistently greater in the 20-mg omeprazole group (62%, day 7; 74%, day 27) than in the 10-mg omeprazole group (41%, day 7; 49%, day 27) or the placebo group (14%, day 7; 23%; day 27). Complete resolution of heartburn every day during the last treatment week was significantly (P< or =.002) higher in the 20-mg omeprazole group (48%) than in the 10-mg omeprazole (27%) or placebo (5%) group. Omeprazole was significantly (P< or =.003) more effective than placebo for the treatment of acid regurgitation, dysphagia, epigastric pain, and nausea.
                Patients with symptomatic GERD require profound acid suppression to achieve symptomatic relief. Omeprazole, 20 mg once daily, was superior to omeprazole, 10 mg once daily, and to placebo in providing early and sustained resolution of heartburn, as well as treatment of other troublesome GERD symptoms. This study was performed to study the demography, effect of treatment with ranitidine and relapse pattern in patients with reflux symptoms.
                Patients with reflux symptoms were examined by endoscopy and included in a double-blind, comparative trial of placebo and ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. for two weeks. At two weeks satisfied patients continued the same treatment. Non-satisfied patients were randomised to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. or q.i.d for another two weeks. After four weeks medication was stopped and satisfied patients were followed for 24 weeks. No further endoscopy was performed.
                Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomised. At two weeks there was no significant difference between placebo and ranitidine, regarding the proportion of patients with complete relief from symptoms or satisfied with treatment. Ranitidine was superior to placebo in improving symptoms at two weeks. Ranitidine, 150 mg q.i.d. offered no additional advantage in weeks three to four over prolonging treatment with 150 mg b.i.d. after the first two weeks. Patients with oesophagitis at inclusion relapsed more than those with symptoms only, 67% compared with 52%, (p = 0.013).
                The effect of ranitidine was marginal compared to placebo. The relapse rate was high after treatment stopped.