[Transcutaneous cerebral electric stimulation by Limoge current during labor]. An evaluation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for pain relief in labour. Pain relief by applying transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on acupuncture points during the first stage of labor: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. The use of transcutaneous nerve stimulation for pain relief during labor. A controlled clinical study. [Transcutaneous electric stimulation of the brain: a comparative study of the effects of its combination with peridural anesthesia using bupivacaine-fentanyl during obstetrical analgesia]. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not augment combined spinal epidural labour analgesia. Pain relief in labour using transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). A TENS/TENS placebo controlled study in two parity groups. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not augment epidural labor analgesia. [Pain relief in childbirth; an analysis of the analgesic effects of transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TNS), pethidine and placebos (author's transl)]. Pain relief in labor by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. Testing of a modified stimulation technique and evaluation of the neurological and biochemical condition of the newborn infant. [Pain-relieving effect of transcutaneous nerve stimulation during delivery. A study among primiparas]. A randomized controlled trial of nonpharmacologic approaches for relief of low back pain during labor. Transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) during the first stage of labour: a randomized clinical trial.
In order to test the analgesic efficacy of Anesthelec (transcutaneous cranial electrical stimulation with Limoge currents) during labour and delivery, a double blind study was performed in 20 cases for whom analgesia was necessary. In 10 cases Anesthelec was used with the Limoge currents on and in 10 cases as a sham. Labour and delivery were carried out by a medical team different from that which set up the Anesthelec. The results showed that this method, with or without nitrous oxide inhalation, decreased by 80% the number of epidural and general anaesthesias that would otherwise have been unavoidable. To define the effects of this new method, maternal and foetal parameters of 50 deliveries carried out under Anesthelec were compared with 50 deliveries carried out under epidural analgesia. Anesthelec was used only if analgesia was required. This study was a retrospective comparison between two similar non paired series. Despite the fact that analgesia obtained with Anesthelec was less powerful than with epidural analgesia, this method showed many advantages: total safety for the child and the mother, easy utilization, shorter labour time, decreased number of instrumental extractions and potentially reduced costs. Good acceptance and satisfaction for the mother should allow a rapid evolution of this new method. The effectiveness of transcutaneous nerve stimulation (TENS) for pain relief in labour was evaluated by randomizing 280 patients in early labour into 2 groups. Inoperative sham machines were applied to patients in the control group and active units to those in the test group. Neither patients nor attending labour ward staff were aware of which group the patient was in. The intensity of low back pain and abdominal pain was assessed by the patient each hour on a visual analogue pain scale. Each patient served as her own control by switching off the machine for 2 contractions every hour and then recording the intensity of pain. The amount of conventional analgesia each patient received was recorded by labour ward staff. There was no difference in the intensity of pain recorded by each group. Nor was there any difference between the 2 groups in the change of pain experienced when the machine was switched off. Moreover there was no difference in the amount of other analgesia required. Some differences were found when those with little low back pain were excluded from the study. We conclude that TENS is ineffective as a routine method of pain relief in labour. It is likely to benefit only those with severe back pain and then only to a modest degree. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is one of the non-pharmacological means of pain relief for labor and delivery. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of TENS on specific acupuncture points for reducing pain in the first stage of labor. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned healthy full-term parturients in active phase of first-stage labor to either TENS on four acupuncture points (Hegu [Li 4] and Sanyinjiao [Sp 6]) (n=52) or the TENS placebo (n=53). Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess pain before and 30 and 60 min after treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of VAS score decrease 3 in each group. A questionnaire was given at 24h post-partum to evaluate the satisfaction of pain relieving method and the willingness to have the same treatment again. Mode of delivery and neonatal effect were measured as secondary outcome. One hundred women were eligible for analysis. TENS group experienced VAS score reduction 3 significantly more common than the TENS placebo group (31/50 [62%] vs 7/50 [14%], P<0.001). Willingness of using the same analgesic method for a future childbirth was also significantly different (TENS: 48/50 [96%] vs TENS placebo: 33/50 [66%], P<0.001). Operative delivery was increased in the TENS group (12/50 [24%] vs 4/50 [8%], P=0.05), but the neonatal outcomes were not different. The application of TENS on specific acupuncture points could be a non-invasive adjunct for pain relief in the first stage of labor. Seventy parturient women were randomized into two groups, one receiving transcutaneous nerve stimulation, the other mock stimulation with an identical looking apparatus. The patients' assessment of pain relief and the use of analgesics during labor were recorded. There was no difference between the two groups in the degree of pain relief. There was no reduction in the need for analgesics which could be ascribed to the use of nerve stimulation. The use of analgesics in each patient was correlated to the duration of labor. In order to test the effectiveness of Anesthelec (transcutaneous cranial electrical stimulation with Limoge currents) during labour and delivery, a randomized study was carried out in 120 primiparous women with extradural anaesthesia during active labor. Combination of transcutaneous cranial electrical stimulation with epidural bupivacaine administration has been showed to provide a 20% pain relief prolongation of the first bupivacaine injection. Statistical studies of drug requirement during labor, of cervical dilatation duration, of mode and duration of delivery and of analgesia quality showed no beneficial additive effect of electrical stimulation for obstetrical analgesia when extradural anaesthesia is performed. The spinal portion of the combined spinal epidural technique (CSE) provides dramatic but limited labour analgesia. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) has been noted to modulate pain, in part by the frequency of stimulation chosen. Because nerve action potentials are blocked by local anesthetics in a frequency dependent manner, we speculated that a TENS unit could increase the quality and duration of the spinal portion of a CSE.
                Forty parturients in active spontaneous labour, with a singleton, vertex, term fetus, requesting analgesia were enrolled in a randomized, double blind fashion to receive a standardized CSE with either an active or inactive TENS unit. Prior to CSE placement, TENS intensity thresholds were determined with electrodes placed on the paraspinus muscles at T10-L1, and S2-4; TENS settings for mode, cycle, and pulse width were standardized. Data were collected at timed intervals on pain (VAS), sensory level (pinprick), motor blockade (Bromage), cervical dilatation, and duration of analgesia, and at delivery on fetal and neonatal outcome.
                The duration of the spinal portion of the CSE did not differ between groups (TENS off 91.1+/-33 [mean +/- SD] vs. TENS on 83.1+/-28 min, P = .42). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Mantel-Cox log rank analysis showed no difference between the two treatments (P = .28). Analgesia was comparable throughout the first hour of spinal analgesia.
                In healthy labouring parturients, the application of a TENS unit did not alter the quality or duration of labour analgesia provided by the spinal portion of CSE analgesia. The analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in labour and effects on outcome were investigated in a double-blind TENS/TENS placebo controlled trial in 100 primigravidae and 50 women in their third labour. There were no differences between the TENS and the TENS placebo users in terms of pain concept or relief, and only 12 and 13% of primigravidae and 48 and 39% of the para 2 women completed labour without requiring other analgesia in their respective groups. The primigravidae who used either TENS or TENS placebo alone had shorter labours than those who required further analgesia. Although the outcome of labour for mother and infant were similar in the two groups, there was a higher operative delivery rate in women who also had epidural analgesia. There were highly significant differences between the TENS and the TENS placebo users in terms of favourable and unfavourable comments by the mothers and the midwives at 1 and 24 h after delivery. The evident consumer satisfaction for TENS suggests TENS has a part to play in analgesia in labour but the equivocal findings in terms of factors associated with pain relief points to the need for apparatus more specifically designed to cope with the special characteristics of the pain of labour. To evaluate whether transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) can increase the quality and duration of an initiation dose of bupivacaine used for the establishment of epidural labor analgesia.
                Randomized, double-blind study.
                Tertiary-care academic medical center.
                40 ASA physical status I and II parturients in early, active spontaneous labor with a singleton, vertex term fetus, and requesting analgesia.
                A standardized epidural technique with either an active or inactive TENS unit was performed. Before epidural placement, TENS intensity thresholds were determined with electrodes placed over the paraspinus muscles at T(10)-L(1), and S(2)-S(4); TENS settings for mode, cycle, and pulse width were standardized.
                Data were collected at timed intervals on pain as measured by visual analog scale (VAS), sensory level (pinprick), motor blockade (Bromage score), cervical dilation, and duration of analgesia.
                The duration of analgesia produced by the initial dose of epidural bupivacaine did not differ between groups (TENS turned off 82.3 +/- 26 [mean +/- SD] vs. TENS activated 80.7 +/- 40 min, p = 0.88). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Mantel-Cox log rank analysis showed no difference between the two treatments (p = 0.75). No difference in the quality of analgesia was observed between the two groups.
                In healthy laboring parturients, the application of a TENS unit did not alter the quality or duration of an initiation dose of bupivacaine utilized for the establishment of epidural labor analgesia. The analgesic affects of TNS, pethidine and placebos on labour pain were studied in 30 parturient women during the first stage of labour. 10 had TNS paravertebrally in the region of the afferent nerves at Th 10-Th 12; one group of 5 had unspecific (wrong) TNS; in another group of five no current was applied (placebo); five women were given 50 mg of pethidine intravenously; five patients acted as a control group. To assess the analgesic effects the women were asked to estimate the intensity of pain (grades 1-6) over a period of 70 minutes. There was no significant difference between the placebo, unspecific TNS and control groups as regarded the increase in pain during the test period. Patients who had received pethidine and those who had been given TNS at the site of the afferent nerves transmitting impulses from the uterus experienced considerable relief of pain. The differences were highly significant. The observations prove the genuine analgesic action of TNS. The use of this technique in obstetrics is discussed. In this prospective randomized study of pain relief in labor, the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TNS) performed over both the low-back and suprapubic region was evaluated and compared with a control group not receiving TNS. Both high frequency and pulse train TNS were used. The study included 24 induced labors. In the TNS group, conventional methods were added when needed, while in the control group only conventional methods were used. Assessment of low-back and suprapubic pain was performed by the parturient each hour during the first stage. In the TNS group most of the parturients reported minimal or moderate low-back pain throughout labor, while parturients in the control group reported an increased intensity of low-back pain as labor progressed. The effect of suprapubic pain was insignificant in both groups. Neither TNS nor nitrous oxide-oxygen mixture and pethidine could reduce this pain component. Course of labor, uterine activity and fetal heart patterns were similar in the two groups. The neonates were evaluated with Apgar score, assays of blood samples from the umbilical vein including blood lactate, plasma hypoxanthine and blood gas, and neurobehavioral assessment on two occasions. All newborn infants were in good condition and no significant differences between the two groups could be demonstrated. nan Low back pain is common during labor. Our randomized controlled trial compared the effectiveness of 3 nonpharmacologic approaches for relief of back pain.
                A total of 34 women suffering from low back pain during labor were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 treatments: (1) intracutaneous sterile water injections (ISW); (2) transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS); and (3) standard care, including back massage, whirlpool bath, and liberal mobilization. Women self-evaluated both intensity and affective dimensions of pain using visual analog scales. Their evaluations of control and satisfaction were assessed using adapted versions of the Labour Agentry Scale and the Labor and Delivery Satisfaction Index.
                Women in the ISW group rated the intensity and unpleasantness of pain during the experimental period significantly lower than women in the standard care group or the TENS group, (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively). Similar results were observed for intensity (P = .01) and unpleasantness (P = .03) of pain assessed just before delivery or request for an epidural. Mean pain intensity at 15 and 60 minutes after randomization was significantly reduced in the ISW group compared with the 2 other groups. There was no significant difference in the 3 groups in the level of control and satisfaction with labor and delivery, but less women in the ISW group indicated that they would like to receive the same treatment for back pain during another delivery.
                Intracutaneous sterile water injections are more effective than standard care (back massage, bath, and mobilization) or transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for relieving low back pain during labor. Our objective was to study the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in reducing pain during the first stage of labour. Using a prospective randomized placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial, a patient-controlled analgesia system was used to measure differences in outcome. Trials took place in a labour unit at the St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands, during a period of 18 months. Forty-six patients, during the first stage of labour, were treated with TENS, and 48 with a placebo apparatus. Main outcome measures were pain relief, amount of administered analgesics, obstetrical and neonatal outcome, and side effects. No significant differences occurred between groups in the number of requests for pethidine/promethazine. The foetal outcome in both groups was the same. TENS and placebo were considered equally effective by both patients and staff. In conclusion, TENS was not more effective than a placebo apparatus in relieving pain during the first stage of labour. No adverse side-effects occurred.