Randomized controlled trial of selective bowel decontamination for prevention of infections following liver transplantation. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial of efficacy and safety of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in liver transplant recipients. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract to prevent postoperative infection: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in liver transplant patients. A randomized, prospective, double-blinded evaluation of selective bowel decontamination in liver transplantation. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract reduces gram-negative pulmonary colonization but not systemic endotoxemia in patients undergoing elective liver transplantation. Supply of pre- and probiotics reduces bacterial infection rates after liver transplantation--a randomized, double-blind trial.
Nonabsorbable antibiotics for selective bowel decontamination (SBD) sometimes are administered to liver transplant patients to prevent postoperative infections, but the efficacy of SBD is not known. Accordingly, we prospectively studied 69 patients randomly assigned to receive conventional prophylaxis with systemic antibiotics (control patients) or conventional prophylaxis plus oral nonabsorbable antibiotics for SBD (SBD patients). Overall rates of bacterial and/or yeast infections were nearly equal among control patients (42%) and SBD patients (39%). However, the infection rate at SBD key sites (abdomen, bloodstream, surgical wound, and lungs) was lower among patients who received the SBD regimen > or = 3 days before transplantation (23%) than among control patients (36%). Administration of the SBD regimen was complicated by gastrointestinal intolerance and noncompliance but not by increased stool colonization with antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Practical problems associated with administering an SBD regimen to patients awaiting cadaver liver transplants limit the regimen's usefulness, but we found a trend toward reduced key site infection when the regimen was given > or = 3 days before transplantation. Infection and rejection are two common complications after liver transplants. In a preliminary study, administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to liver transplant recipients was associated with a decrease in sepsis episodes, sepsis-related deaths, and rejection compared with a historical control group of patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate further the efficacy of G-CSF in liver transplant patients in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter trial.
                Adult patients with a United Network Organ Sharing classification of 1 or 2 were randomized to receive a placebo, 100 microg/day of G-CSF or 300 microg/day of G-CSF. The study drug was started preoperatively and then continued after the transplant for a maximum of 21 days. Patients were evaluated for microbiologically-documented infection, biopsy-proven rejection, number of treatments for rejection, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, graft survival, death, and adverse events.
                During the first 30 days after the transplant, the median peak white blood cell count was 16.5x10(9)/L, 34.6x10(9)L, and 54.8x10(9)/L for the placebo, low-dose G-CSF, and high-dose G-CSF patients, respectively. The incidence of infection was 30% in G-CSF patients (34 of 114 patients) and 34% in placebo patients (20 of 58 patients). Except for more nosocomial pneumonias in the G-CSF patients (7 in 114 patients vs. 0 in 58 patients, P=0.056), the types of infections and causative organisms were also similar in both treatment groups. Although the number of treatments for clinically suspected or proven rejection was similar in the G-CSF and placebo patients, biopsy-proven rejection occurred more often in G-CSF patients (34 of 114 patients or 30%) than placebo patients (11 of 58 patients or 19%) (P=0.093). There were no cases of graft loss caused by rejection. G-CSF had no effect on length of stay in the intensive-care unit or hospital. There were 22 G-CSF patients (18%) and 10 placebo patients (15%) who died within 120 days after the transplant. No serious adverse events were attributed to G-CSF.
                Despite producing substantial increases in the white blood cell count after the transplant, G-CSF had no beneficial effects on infection, rejection, or survival in this study. Biopsy-proven rejection and nosocomial pneumonias were more common in patients treated with G-CSF compared with those taking the placebo. No serious adverse events were attributed to G-CSF. To determine the efficacy of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) in patients undergoing elective transplantation of the liver.
                Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
                Two academic teaching hospitals.
                Adult patients undergoing elective liver transplantation: 26 patients receiving SDD and 29 patients receiving a placebo.
                Patients undergoing SDD were administered 400 mg of norfloxacin once daily as soon as they were accepted for transplantation. Postoperative treatment for this group consisted of 2 mg of colistin, 1.8 mg of tobramycin, and 10 mg of amphotericin B, four times daily, combined with an oral paste containing a 2% solution of the same drugs until postoperative day 30. Prophylactic intravenous administration of antibiotics was not part of the SDD regimen in this study. Control patients were given a similar regimen with placebo drugs.
                The mean number of postoperative bacterial and fungal infections in the first 30 days after transplantation was the primary efficacy end point. Days on a ventilator, days spent in the intensive care unit, and medical costs were registered as secondary outcome variables.
                Of the 26 patients undergoing SDD, 22 (84.5%) developed an infection in the postoperative study period; in the placebo group (n = 29), these numbers were not significantly different (25 patients, 86%). The mean number of postoperative infectious episodes per patient was also not significantly different: 1.77 (SDD) vs. 1.93 (placebo). Infections involving Gram-negative aerobic bacteria and Candida species were significantly less frequent in patients receiving SDD (p <.001 and p <.05). Total costs were higher in the group receiving SDD.
                Selective decontamination of the digestive tract does not prevent infection in patients undergoing elective liver transplantation and increases the cost of their care. It does, however, affect the type of infection. Infections with Gram-negative bacilli and with Candida species are replaced by infections with Gram-positive cocci. Bacterial infection is a frequent, morbid, and mortal complication of liver transplantation. Selective bowel decontamination (SBD) has been reported to reduce the rate of bacterial infection after liver transplantation in uncontrolled trials, but benefits of this intervention have been less clear in controlled studies.
                Eighty candidates for liver transplantation were randomly assigned in a double-blinded fashion to an SBD regimen consisting of gentamicin 80 mg+polymyxin E 100 mg+nystatin 2 million units (37 patients) or to nystatin alone (43 patients). Both treatments were administered orally in 10 ml (increasing to 20 ml, according to predefined criteria), four times daily, through day 21 after transplantation. Anal fecal swab cultures were performed on days 0, 4, 7, and 21. Rates of infection, death, and charges for medical care were assessed from day 0 through day 60.
                More than 85% of patients in both treatment groups began study treatment more than 3 days before transplantation. Rates of infection (32.4 vs. 27.9%), death (5.4 vs. 4.7%), or charges for medical care (median $194,000 vs. $163,000) were not reduced in patients assigned to SBD. On days 0, 4, 7, and 21, growth of aerobic gram-negative flora in fecal cultures of patients assigned to SBD was significantly less than that of patients taking nystatin alone; growth of aerobic gram-positive flora, anaerobes, and yeast was not significantly different.
                Routine use of SBD in patients undergoing liver transplantation is not associated with significant benefit. To examine the effect of selective antibiotic decontamination of the digestive tract in patients undergoing elective orthotopic liver transplantation.
                Prospective, randomized, concurrent allocation to either selective decontamination or standard antibiotic prophylaxis.
                Operating theater and intensive care unit at a tertiary referral, university teaching hospital.
                Fifty-nine adult patients were recruited into the study and underwent liver transplantation.
                Thirty-two patients were randomized to standard treatment (control group) and 27 patients were randomized to receive selective decontamination. After early deaths and exclusions, 31 controls and 21 decontamination patients were available for analysis.
                Portal and systemic endotoxemia, colonization and infection rates, severity of illness (organ system failures, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System score), antibiotic costs, and hospital survival rates were measured. Selective decontamination significantly reduced pulmonary infections and enteric, aerobic, and Gram-negative bacillary colonization without facilitating the emergence of resistant organisms, but selective decontamination had no effect on endotoxemia or the development of organ system failures. The financial costs of the selective decontamination regimen outweighed the advantages gained from an associated reduction in antibiotic usage.
                The failure of selective decontamination to enhance survival rates in many studies of the regimen in critically ill patients may, in part, be related to the inability of selective decontamination to abolish endotoxemia. Bacterial infections frequently occur early after liver transplantation. We recently reported significant progress with a synbiotic composition, consisting of one lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and one fiber, which reduced the infection rate from 48% (with selective bowel decontamination) to 13%. Now, our aim is to study if a combination of different LAB and fibers would further improve outcome. A prospective randomized double-blind trial was undertaken in 66 liver transplant recipients. All patients received enteral nutrition immediately post-operatively. Comparison was made between one group (A) receiving a composition of four LAB and four fibers and another group (B) receiving the fibers only. The treatment started the day before surgery and continued for 14 days. Thirty-day infection rate, length of hospital stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, non-infectious complications and side effects of enteral nutrition were recorded. The incidence of post-operative bacterial infections was significantly reduced; being 48% with only fibers and 3% with LAB and fibers. In addition, the duration of antibiotic therapy was significantly shorter in the latter group. In both groups, mainly mild or moderate infections occurred. Fibers and LAB were well tolerated. Early enteral nutrition supplemented with a mixture of LAB and fibers reduces bacterial infection rates following liver transplantation. Treatment with only fibers led to a low incidence of severe infections.