Effects of an oral contraceptive containing drospirenone on bone turnover and bone mineral density. Effects of levonorgestrel-releasing subdermal contraceptive implants on bone density and bone metabolism. Effects of a low-dose and ultra-low-dose combined oral contraceptive use on bone turnover and bone mineral density in young fertile women: a prospective controlled randomized study. Subcutaneous DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density. Double-blinded randomized controlled trial of estrogen supplementation in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception. Evidence that treatment with monophasic oral contraceptive formulations containing ethinylestradiol plus gestodene reduces bone resorption in young women. A prospective, controlled study of the effects of hormonal contraception on bone mineral density. Effects of the contraceptive patch and the vaginal ring on bone metabolism and bone mineral density: a prospective, controlled, randomized study. Differential effects on bone density of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women. Metabolic profile of a continuous versus a cyclic low-dose combined oral contraceptive after one year of use. A prospective study of the forearm bone density of users of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants. Comparison of the skeletal effects of the progestogens desogestrel and levonorgestrel in oral contraceptive preparations in young women: controlled, open, partly randomized investigation over 13 cycles. Premenopause contraception with monthly injectable Mesigyna with special emphasis on serum lipid and bone density patterns. Effects of two low-dose combined oral contraceptives containing drospirenone on bone turnover and bone mineral density in young fertile women: a prospective controlled randomized study. A 3-year double-blind, randomized, controlled study on the influence of two oral contraceptives containing either 20 microg or 30 microg ethinylestradiol in combination with levonorgestrel on bone mineral density. A randomized controlled trial of estrogen replacement therapy in long-term users of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.
To compare the effects of a new 21-day combined oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinyl/estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone with a 21-day preparation containing 30 microg ethinyl/estradiol plus 75 microg gestodene on bone turnover and bone mineral density in young fertile women.
                A randomized, controlled trial was conducted with healthy fertile women treated with 30 microg ethinyl/estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone (group A; n = 24), 30 microg ethinyl/estradiol plus 75 microg gestodene (group B; n = 24) and healthy controls (group C, n = 23). At 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of the study, serum and urinary calcium, osteocalcin, urinary pyridinoline, and deoxypyridinoline were measured. At baseline and after 12 months, lumbar bone mineral density was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
                In groups A and B, urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline at 6, 9, and 12 months were significantly reduced in comparison with basal values and group C (P < .05). Pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline levels were lower in group A than in group B throughout the study, but not significantly. In group A serum calcium levels were significantly increased after 6 months. At 12 months, no significant difference was detected in lumbar bone mineral density values among the 3 groups and in comparison with basal values.
                Both combined oral contraceptives exert a similar positive influence on bone turnover and bone-sparing effect in young postadolescent women. A prospective, randomized clinical trial observed the effects of Norplant long-term contraceptive implants and domestic implants similar to Norplant on bone mineral density and bone metabolism in female acceptors for 1 year. Bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) of lumbar 2-4 and proximal femur of 61 normal women of child-bearing age were measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) before and 12 months after implants insertion in both groups. BMD and BMC of lumbar 2-4 in both groups 12 months after implant insertion significantly increased (p < 0.01); with an average increase of 2.40% and 3.34%, respectively in the Norplant implant group, and 2.75% and 4.47%, respectively in the domestic implant group. Urine hydroxyproline and creatinine ratio (Hop/Cr) in the domestic implant group significantly decreased (p < 0.01). There was no significant differences in the effects on BMD and BMC of lumbar spine and femur and on bone metabolism between the two groups of contraceptive implants (p > 0.05). Levonorgestrel releasing contraceptive subdermal implants were not deleterious to the skeleton in women of child-bearing age. There was no significant effect on achieving maximum bone mass in young women. In this prospective, controlled, randomized study, we compared the effect of a low-dose 21-day combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 20 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) and 75 microg gestodene (GTD) (Group A; n = 19) with an ultra-low-dose 24-day COC containing 15 microg EE and 60 microg GTD (Group B; n = 18) on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in young, fertile women. Nineteen healthy fertile women were used as untreated controls (Group C). At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of the study serum osteocalcin (BGP), urinary pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (D-PYD) were measured in all subjects. At baseline and after 12 months BMD was determined at lumbar spine by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in all patients. In both Groups A and B, urinary levels of PYD and D-PYD at 6, 9 and 12 months, were significantly reduced in comparison with basal values and with control subjects (p < 0.05). No significant differences in urinary PYD and D-PYD levels were observed between Groups A and B during the entire period of treatment. At 12 months, no statistically significant difference in spinal BMD values was detected between the three groups and in comparison with basal values. The present study suggests that the two COCs could exert a similar positive effect on bone turnover in young postadolescent women, without any significant and appreciable modification of BMD. A formulation of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) has been developed that allows subcutaneous injection (104 mg/0.65 mL; DMPA-SC) and achieves highly effective contraception with a similar tolerability profile to intramuscular DMPA (150 mg/mL; DMPA-IM).
                This randomized, evaluator-blinded study was designed to compare efficacy, safety, and user satisfaction in women receiving DMPA-SC (n=266) or DMPA-IM (n=268) for 2 years with an option to continue for a third year. The primary objectives were to evaluate bone mineral density (BMD) changes and contraceptive efficacy after 2 years.
                A total of 225 women completed the first 2 years of this study (DMPA-SC, n=116; DMPA-IM, n=109). After 2 years of DMPA use, BMD loss was marginally smaller in the DMPA-SC group than in the DMPA-IM group at both the total hip (-3.3% and -3.6%, respectively) and lumbar spine (-4.3% and -5.0%, respectively). In those women who received DMPA during the third year, there were no statistically significant differences in BMD loss between DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM groups at the end of Year 3. Recovery of BMD was observed in the small subpopulation of women who had discontinued DMPA-SC or DMPA-IM after the second year. The 2-year treatment-failure cumulative pregnancy rate was 0% in the DMPA-SC group and 0.8% (95% confidence interval, 0.00-2.37%) in the DMPA-IM group (life-table method). Adverse events were similar in the two groups except that injection site reactions were more common in the DMPA-SC group.
                DMPA-SC is an effective and well-tolerated contraceptive option, providing comparable efficacy and BMD safety to DMPA-IM. The purpose of this clinical trial was to evaluate the effect of estrogen supplementation on bone mineral density in adolescent girls who received depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception.
                One hundred twenty-three adolescents who began receiving depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections every 12 weeks were assigned randomly to receive monthly injections of estradiol cypionate or placebo. The main outcome was bone mineral density that was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for 12 (n = 69) to 24 (n = 36) months. Participants, technicians, and physicians were blinded to estrogen treatment.
                Over the 24-month period, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density at the lumbar spine was 2.8% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -1.8% in the placebo group ( P <.001). At the femoral neck, the percentage of change from baseline bone mineral density was 4.7% in the estradiol cypionate group versus -5.1% in the placebo group ( P <.001).
                Our results suggest that estrogen supplementation is protective of bone in adolescent girls who receive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injections. The aim of the study was to evaluate if a pill containing the same dose of the same type of progestin compound (gestodene, GES, 75 microg) but different doses of ethinylestradiol (EE2) (20 or 30 microg) differently influences specific markers of bone resorption (urinary levels of pyridinoline (PYR) and dexoxypyridinoline (D-PYR)). During the 12 months of the study a significant decrease of urinary levels of PYR and D-PYR was found in 2 groups of young post-adolescent women taking the pills with 20 and 30 microg of EE2 in comparison with control women (subjects of the same age group with normal menstrual cycle who did not use contraception). In women taking pills with 20 or 30 microg EE2, the levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) significantly increased during treatment in comparison with baseline, whereas in the same time period no changes occurred in control women. These findings suggest that similar to the pill containing 30 microg EE2, the lower dosage of the EE2 pill (20 microg) is also capable of reducing bone resorption. Twenty and 30 microg EE2 pills exert the same biological estrogenic effect. In fact, SHBG levels significantly increased with both pills. However, an additional effect of the progestin compound that could act directly on progestin or estrogen receptors of bone cannot be excluded. Since contraception with a pill containing the lowest estrogen dose is associated with the lowest incidence of side effects, these findings further suggest a pill containing 20 microg EE2 for young post-adolescent women would be the best choice. To compare the effect of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and two types of oral contraceptives (OC) on bone mineral density (BMD) among women 18-33 years of age with those not using hormonal contraception.
                Data from 155 women were analyzed. Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate was administered to 33 women; 63 women who chose oral contraception were randomly assigned to receive either a norethindrone-containing pill (n = 28) or a desogestrel-containing pill (n = 35). Fifty-nine women who did not use hormonal contraception served as controls. Lumbar spine BMD was determined using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and after 12 months of contraceptive use. We analyzed method-related percent change in BMD while controlling for body mass index, calcium intake, exercise, and smoking. We had approximately 90% power to detect a 2.5% difference between any two groups.
                Users of DMPA experienced a mean BMD loss of 2.74% over 12 months compared with controls who sustained a 0.37% loss (P = .01). Users of OCs generally demonstrated a gain (2.33% for norethindrone-containing pills, 0.33% for desogestrel-containing pills), which was different from controls among users of norethindrone-containing pills (P = .01), but not among users of desogestrel-containing pills (P = .99). Observed changes in BMD among DMPA users differed from women who used either type of pill (P < .002).
                Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate has an adverse effect on BMD, in comparison with OCs or nonhormonal methods, when used for 12 months. Results must be interpreted cautiously until it is determined whether these effects endure or are reversible. This study was conducted to compare the effects of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 mcg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 mcg of etonorgestrel daily with the effects of the contraceptive patch, a transdermal system that delivers a daily dose of 20 mcg of EE and 150 mcg of norelgestromin on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in young fertile women.
                On the basis of a randomized, computer-generated list, 40 women desiring contraception were assigned to a 12-month treatment with a patch delivering a daily dose of 20 mcg of EE and 150 mcg of norelgestromin (Evra, Janssen-Cilag, Italy) (Group A, n=20) or to a 12-month treatment with a vaginal ring releasing a daily dose of 15 mcg of EE and 120 mcg of etonorgestrel (NuvaRing, Organon, Italy) (Group B, n=20). Twenty patients underwent no treatment and were used as healthy controls (Group C, n=20). At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, serum and urinary calcium, osteocalcin and urinary pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (D-PYD) levels were measured. At baseline and after 12 months, lumbar BMD was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
                In Groups A and B, urinary PYD and D-PYD at 6, 9 and 12 months were significantly reduced in comparison with basal values and Group C values (p<.05). In Groups A and B, serum calcium levels were significantly increased after 6 months. No significant difference was detected between Group A and Group B in urinary levels of PYD and D-PYD, in calcium levels and in osteocalcin levels. At 12 months, no significant difference was detected in spinal BMD values between the three groups and in comparison with basal values.
                Both contraceptive systems exert a similar positive influence on bone turnover in young postadolescent women.
                Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. The question of differential effects on bone density by two different types of progestogen-only methods for contraception in premenopausal women was addressed. Data from a prospective randomized clinical trial among 22 premenopausal women, age 32.6 (range 20-45 years), who were randomly assigned to either of two treatments with continuous progestogens for contraception were analyzed; depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) or continuous levonorgestrel treatment with subdermal implants (Norplant), respectively. Forearm bone density (BMDprox) increased with 2.94% (p = 0.006) in women who were prescribed levonorgestrel, which was in contrast to stable values in those prescribed depot-medroxy-progesterone acetate; group difference at 6 months for BMDprox 3.4% (95% CI 1.3, 5.5; p = 0.025) and BMDdist 4.1% (95% CI - 1.3, 9.6; p = 0.077). The changes in bone density were consistent with the changes in biochemical indices for bone metabolism; DMPA users showed signs of increased bone turnover and users of levonorgestrel showed increased bone formation with increased levels of both alkaline phosphatase (p = 0.004) and osteocalcin (p = 0.007). The findings suggest an increase in bone density during treatment with levonorgestrel and stable values during short-term administration of DMPA, in standard clinical doses for contraception. To compare the effects of a combined oral contraceptive (COC) taken continuously with those of one of similar composition taken cyclically on 30 variables related to haemostasis, lipids, carbohydrates, bone metabolism, and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG).
                Randomised, open-label, multicentre, comparative substudy of a larger phase 3 trial involving 147 healthy women (age 18-49 years). Participants received the COC either continuously (levonorgestrel [LNG] 90 μg/ethinylestradiol [EE] 20 μg) or cyclically (21/7 days pattern; LNG 100 μg/EE 20 μg).
                After 13 pill packs, changes in total cholesterol (+0.23 vs. -0.06 mmol/l), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+0.25 vs. -0.12 mmol/l), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(3) (-0.06 vs. -0.15 mmol/l) differed significantly (p<0.05) between the continuous and cyclic regimens, respectively. Increases were significantly greater (p <0.05) for protein C antigen (+11.8% vs. +6.1%) and SHBG (+791 vs. +565 nmol/l), and significantly smaller (p <0.05, ranks) for D-dimer (+19 vs. +37 μg FE/l).
                Overall, the continuous and cyclic regimens affected metabolic variables similarly. The larger increase in SHBG with the continuous COC is consistent with a higher net oestrogenic effect due to a lower daily dose of LNG. Prospective studies are required to determine the long-term effects of this continuous COC regimen. The aim of the study was to compare bone mineral density (BMD) before insertion and at 18 months of use of etonorgestrel- and levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.
                One hundred and eleven women, 19-43 years of age, were randomly allocated to two groups: 56 to etonorgestrel and 55 to levonorgestrel. BMD was evaluated at the midshaft of the ulna and at the distal radius of the non-dominant forearm using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before insertion and at 18 months of use.
                There was no difference in baseline demographic or anthropometric characteristics, or in BMD of users of either model of implant. BMD was significantly lower at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna in both groups of users. However, no difference was found at the distal radius. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the variables associated with BMD at 18 months of use in both implant groups were baseline BMD, body mass index (BMI) and difference in BMI (0 versus 18 months of use).
                Women of 19-43 years of age using either one of the implants showed lower BMD at 18 months of use at the midshaft of the ulna, however, without a difference at the distal radius. This 12-month study was conducted to evaluate the skeletal effects of two monophasic oral contraceptives containing 20 mug of ethinylestradiol and 100 mug of levonorgestrel (LEVO) or 150 mug of desogestrel (DESO).
                Fifty-two women (18-24 years) were randomized into the DESO group or the LEVO group; 36 women served as controls. The areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of the femoral neck and the lumbar spine was evaluated by DXA, and parameters of bone geometry and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) were assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography at the distal radius and the tibia.
                The LEVO group did not lose vertebral aBMD, whereas women in the DESO group lost 1.5%. At the distal radius and the tibia (shank level, 14%), LEVO induced an increase in total cross-sectional area, indicating increased periosteal bone formation. Radial trabecular vBMD declined by 1.4+/-1.8% in the DESO group, while it remained unchanged in the LEVO group.
                Our study suggests that the skeletal effects of OC preparations may be influenced by progestogenic components in young women. This 2-year study compared Mesigyna(R) administered to 49 pre-menopausal women between 38 and 50 years, to 99 women fitted with an IUD (Nova-T). A complete lipoprotein assessment was carried out before treatment and at 6, 12, and 24 months of treatment. A bone densitometry was performed on half of the women, and an endometrial biopsy was taken from half of the Meisgyna group before and at the end of the first and second year. No pregnancy occurred with Mesigyna use while three pregnancies were observed with the IUD. The incidence of bleeding anomalies was higher in the Mesigyna group, with a discontinuation rate for these reasons of 20% versus 4% for IUD (p <0.05). The duration of bleeding days as well as dysmenorrhea were less with Mesigyna. No differences were seen in the pattern of intermenstrual bleeding and spinal bone density between both groups. No patient developed endometrial hyperplasia after treatment, thus endometrial risk seemed not to be increased. Total and LDL cholesterol, and apolipoproteins did not show modifications. A slight decrease in total triglycerides, HDL and HDL(2) cholesterol, and IDL lipoproteins was observed with Mesigyna. The present study appears to be the first using a monthly injectable hormonal contraceptive and monitoring its influence on lipid patterns in premenopausal women. Mesigyna proved to be a highly effective and low risk agent for premenopausal users. The effects of a 21-day combined oral contraceptive containing 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone with a 21-day preparation containing 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone on bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD) in young fertile women were compared.
                A randomized, controlled trial was conducted on healthy fertile women treated with 30 mcg ethinyl estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone (Group A; n=21), 20 mcg ethinyl estradiol plus 3 mg drospirenone (Group B; n=23) and healthy controls (Group C; n=21). At 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, serum and urinary calcium, osteocalcin (BGP), urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline were measured. At baseline and after 12 months, lumbar bone mineral density was determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
                In Groups A and B, urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline at 6, 9 and 12 months were significantly reduced in comparison with basal values and Group C (p<.05). In Groups A and B, serum calcium levels were significantly increased after 6 months. No significant difference was detected between Groups A and B in urinary levels of pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline, in calcium levels and in BGP levels. At 12 months, no significant difference was detected in spinal BMD values between the three groups and in comparison with basal values.
                Both combined oral contraceptives exert a similar positive influence on bone turnover in young postadolescent women. In this first prospective, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study we evaluated the influence of two combined oral contraceptives on bone mineral density (BMD) and metabolic bone parameters. One dose-reduced preparation contained 20 microg ethinylestradiol (EE) in combination with 100 microg levonorgestrel (LNG) (20/100) was compared with the reference preparation which contained 30 microg EE in combination with 150 microg LNG (30/150). Data from 48 volunteers aged 20-35 years were obtained over an observation period of 36 treatment cycles. The direction of the change (increase or decrease) in all investigated bone-related variables was similar in both treatment groups. As compared to baseline, bone mineral density decreased by 0.4% in the 20/100 group and by 0.8% in the 30/150 group after 36 treatment cycles. These changes were not significantly different between the two treatment groups (p = 0.902). For bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, we measured a mean increase of 55.4% (20/100 group) and of 113.2% (30/150 group) after 36 treatment cycles. The two treatments did not differ statistically significantly (p = 0.522). With respect to cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTx), we detected a decrease of the mean NTx urine concentrations of 21.1% (20/100) and of 13.4% (30/150). These changes also did not significantly differ between the two treatments (p = 0.613). Both study treatments were safe and well-tolerated by all volunteers participating in the study. In conclusion, BMD did not change during the 3-year observation period. Thus, both trial preparations containing either 20 or 30 microg EE in combination with LNG were capable of maintaining BMD in young fertile women. There is no reason to assume that the EE dose reduction had any negative impact on BMD. Because there were no differences in BMD between the treatment groups, it can be assumed that even lower dosages than 20 microg EE might be sufficient for bone protection. Biochemical markers provided evidence for a reduced bone resorption. Long-term use of the injectable contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA, Depo-Provera) is associated with a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD), particularly in the lumbar spine. The cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is not known, but the relative estrogen deficiency induced by DMPA use could be responsible. We have undertaken a randomized, double-blind controlled trial of oral estrogen replacement therapy in 38 premenopausal women (mean age 37) with a minimum 2 yr DMPA use who had a below average baseline lumbar spine BMD (T score < or = 0). Nineteen women were allocated to receive conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg/d orally) and 19 to receive a matching placebo. All continued with regular DMPA injections throughout the study. Areal bone density was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total body sites every 6 months for 2 yr; the main outcome measure being the change in areal BMD at the lumbar spine. At baseline, the two groups were well matched for demographic, anthropometric, and biochemical variables, and for BMD. Twenty-seven subjects completed at least 18 months in the study, and 26 the full 2 yr, with similar numbers dropping out from each group (mainly for personal reasons). In the estrogen-treated group, mean lumbar spine BMD increased 1%, whereas in the placebo group it fell 2.6%, over 2 yr. The between group differences were 2.0% at 12 months (P = 0.058), 3.2% at 18 months (P < 0.01), and 3.5% at 24 months (P < 0.002). Differences of lesser statistical magnitude were seen at the femoral neck (between group differences at 2 yr: 2.7%, P = 0.24), Ward's triangle (5.0%, P = 0.055), greater trochanter (3.6%, P = 0.056), total body (1.3%, P = 0.046), legs (1.3%, P = 0.065), and trunk (2.0%, P = 0.029). There were no major adverse events. These data support the view that the likely cause of DMPA-associated bone loss is estrogen deficiency and demonstrate that it can be arrested by estrogen replacement therapy.