Prophylactic treatment of cytomegalovirus primary infection with ganciclovir in renal transplant recipients. A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Two grams daily of oral acyclovir reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients. Prophylactic oral ganciclovir compared with deferred therapy for control of cytomegalovirus in renal transplant recipients. Prevention of primary cytomegalovirus disease in organ transplant recipients with oral ganciclovir or oral acyclovir prophylaxis. Extended valganciclovir prophylaxis to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation: a randomized, controlled trial. Randomised trial of efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir in the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in liver-transplant recipients. The Oral Ganciclovir International Transplantation Study Group [corrected]. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral acyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of renal allografts. Efficacy of oral ganciclovir in prevention of cytomegalovirus infection in post-kidney transplant patients. A controlled trial of ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after heart transplantation. Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplantation: a randomized trial comparing a combination of ganciclovir and acyclovir to acyclovir. NIDDK Liver Transplantation Database. Valganciclovir prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus impairs lymphocyte proliferation and activation in renal transplant recipients. Valacyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation. International Valacyclovir Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis Transplantation Study Group. Effect of prophylactic ganciclovir on cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients. Controlled trial of prophylactic versus therapeutic use of ganciclovir after liver transplantation in adults. Randomized controlled trial of sequential intravenous and oral ganciclovir versus prolonged intravenous ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk cytomegalovirus-seronegative liver transplant recipients with cytomegalovirus-seropositive donors. Valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis reduces the risk of acute renal allograft rejection. Randomised comparison of ganciclovir and high-dose acyclovir for long-term cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in liver-transplant recipients. Viral prophylaxis in hepatic transplantation: preliminary report of a randomized trial of acyclovir and gancyclovir. A comparison of ganciclovir and acyclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus after lung transplantation. Comparison of intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral acyclovir with intravenous ganciclovir alone for prevention of cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus disease after liver transplantation in children. A randomized prospective trial of oral versus intravenous ganciclovir for prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in high-risk kidney recipients. A comparative randomised study of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. The efficacy and safety of 200 days valganciclovir cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients. Impact of high-dose oral acyclovir prophylaxis on cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in CMV high-risk renal transplant recipients. High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis reduces cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant patients. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of low-dose ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after heart transplantation. Valacyclovir prevention of cytomegalovirus reactivation after heart transplantation: a randomized trial. Preemptive ganciclovir therapy in cytomegalovirus-seropositive renal transplants recipients. A prospective randomized trial comparing sequential ganciclovir-high dose acyclovir to high dose acyclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in adult liver transplant recipients. Preemptive ganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus antibody-positive renal transplant recipients. A randomized controlled trial. Randomized controlled trial of acyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in liver transplant recipients. Efficacy and safety of valganciclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients. Randomized trial of daily versus three-times-weekly prophylactic ganciclovir after lung and heart-lung transplantation. Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis by ganciclovir followed by high-dose acyclovir in renal transplantation: a randomized, controlled trial. Randomized controlled trial of oral ganciclovir versus oral acyclovir after induction with intravenous ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus-seropositive liver transplant recipients.
nan Posttransplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. We performed a randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in a group of renal allograft recipients considered at high risk for CMV disease due to the use of OKT3 induction therapy.
                A total of 101 recipients of cadaveric (83) and zero haplotype-matched live donor (18) kidney transplants were entered into the trial. A total of 22 D-R- patients received no prophylaxis. Twenty-seven D+R-, 29 D+R+, and 23 D-R+ patients were randomized to receive 3 months of either oral acyclovir (800 mg q.i.d.) or oral ganciclovir (1000 mg t.i.d.). Doses were adjusted according to the level of renal function. The D+R- patients were also given CMV immune globulin biweekly for 16 weeks. Surveillance blood cultures were obtained at transplantation, at months 1, 2, 3, and 6, and when clinically indicated. The primary study end points were time to CMV infection and disease the first 6 months after transplantation.
                The mean follow up was 14.4 months. Both agents were well tolerated, and no drug interruptions for toxicity occurred. CMV was isolated in 14 of 39 (35.9%) acyclovir-treated and 1 of 40 (2.5%) ganciclovir-treated recipients by 6 months (P=0.0001). Symptomatic CMV disease occurred in 9 of 14 (64%) of the acyclovir patients, two with tissue-invasive disease. Infection rates for acyclovir vs. ganciclovir, respectively, stratified by CMV serology were: D+R-, 54 vs. 0%, P=0.0008; D+R+, 43 vs. 6.6%, P=0.01; D-R+, 8.3 vs. 0%, P=NS. No patient developed CMV infection while taking oral ganciclovir, however three delayed infections occurred 2-7 months after finishing therapy. Each patient had been previously treated for acute rejection.
                Oral acyclovir provides effective CMV prophylaxis only for recipients of seronegative donor kidneys. Oral ganciclovir is a superior agent providing effective CMV prophylaxis for recipients of seropositive donor kidneys. Recipients who are treated for acute rejection are at risk for delayed CMV infection during the first posttransplantation year. Our objective in this study was to determine the efficacy of 2 grams a day of oral acyclovir administered for 16 weeks after transplantation for the prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients. Seventy-three adult liver transplant recipients, seropositive for CMV, were randomized to receive either 2 grams a day of oral acyclovir for 16 weeks after transplantation or no prophylaxis. The incidence of CMV disease was significantly lower in the acyclovir group (5%) than in the control group (27%; P < 0.05). By log-rank analysis, the differences in the probability of presenting CMV disease over the first 16 weeks and over the 1st year were also significant (P < 0.05). We conclude that 2 grams a day of oral acyclovir provides effective prophylaxis against CMV disease in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients. Treatment with prophylactic oral acyclovir, intravenous ganciclovir, or immunoglobulins to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in renal transplantation is associated with variable efficacy and significant expense. We studied control of CMV in renal transplant recipients using either prophylactic oral ganciclovir or deferred therapy with intensive monitoring with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis.
                Forty-two recipients were followed for 6 months after transplantation. Ganciclovir (1000 mg p.o. t.i.d.; n=19) or acyclovir (200 mg p.o. b.i.d.; n=23) was begun at transplantation and continued for 12 weeks. PCR for CMV was performed on buffy-coat specimens every week for 15 weeks and at months 5 and 6.
                No patients in the ganciclovir group, compared with 14 of 23 patients (61%) in the deferred-therapy group (P<0.0001), developed CMV disease during the first 12 weeks. In the ganciclovir group, 4 of 19 patients (21%) subsequently experienced 5 episodes, whereas 14 patients in the deferred-therapy group experienced 18 episodes (P=0.013 for subjects and P=0.026 for episodes). The time to disease was also delayed in the ganciclovir group compared with the deferred-therapy group (133+/-17 days vs. 51+/-7 days; P<0.0001). Oral ganciclovir also prevented CMV viremia during prophylaxis (2/19 patients [11%] vs. 23/23 patients [100%]). Time to CMV viremia was delayed in the ganciclovir group; however, 13/19 patients (68%) ultimately showed PCR evidence for CMV viremia (P=0.005).
                An initial 12-week course of oral ganciclovir prevents CMV disease and infection in renal transplant recipients during prophylaxis, and the benefits persist after discontinuation. Optimal prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease for organ transplant patients at risk for primary infection (donor seropositive, recipient seronegative, D+R-) remains to be determined. We hypothesized that prolonged oral ganciclovir therapy following intravenous therapy would provide increased protection.
                A total of 155 evaluable D+R- organ transplant recipients from 13 transplant centers were entered into the study: all received intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg/day) for 5-10 days and then either oral acyclovir (400 mg tid) or oral ganciclovir (1 g tid) for an additional 12 weeks. Patients were assigned to their treatment groups at a central randomization site, with a separate randomization scheme for each of the organs transplanted (kidney, heart, or liver). In the case of kidney transplants, the patients were stratified according to source of the kidney (living related vs. cadaveric donor). The primary endpoint was the incidence of CMV disease in the first six months post-transplant.
                Treatment with oral ganciclovir was associated with a significant decrease in the incidence of symptomatic disease or viremia when compared with the oral acyclovir group (32% vs. 50%, P<0.05). This difference was most marked in terms of tissue invasive disease: only 3 of 15 symptomatic patients in the ganciclovir group vs. 10 of 21 in the acyclovir group developed tissue-invasive infection (P<0.05). There was a significant difference in the time to CMV disease or viremia in the two groups: mean time 212+/-17 days post-transplant for the acyclovir group vs. 291+/-13 days for the ganciclovir group (P<0.001). The incidence of allograft rejection was 34% in the ganciclovir group and 46% in the acyclovir group (P=NS). Leukopenia was more common in the ganciclovir group (P<0.05), but in no case did it require drug discontinuation. Ganciclovir resistance did not develop in this study.
                Prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir following a brief course of intravenous ganciclovir provides useful protection against primary CMV disease. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most prevalent opportunistic infection after lung transplantation. Current strategies do not prevent CMV in most at-risk patients.
                To determine whether extending prophylaxis with oral valganciclovir from the standard 3 months to 12 months after lung transplantation is efficacious.
                Randomized, clinical trial. Patients were randomly assigned by a central automated system to treatment or placebo. Patients and investigators were blinded to treatment status. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00227370)
                Multicenter trial involving 11 U.S. lung transplant centers.
                136 lung transplant recipients who completed 3 months of valganciclovir prophylaxis.
                9 additional months of oral valganciclovir (n = 70) or placebo (n = 66).
                The primary end point was freedom from CMV disease (syndrome or tissue-invasive) on an intention-to-treat basis 300 days after randomization. Secondary end points were CMV disease severity, CMV infection, acute rejection, opportunistic infections, ganciclovir resistance, and safety.
                CMV disease occurred in 32% of the short-course group versus 4% of the extended-course group (P < 0.001). Significant reductions were observed with CMV infection (64% vs. 10%; P < 0.001) and disease severity (110 000 vs. 3200 copies/mL, P = 0.009) with extended treatment. Rates of acute rejection, opportunistic infections, adverse events, CMV UL97 ganciclovir-resistance mutations, and laboratory abnormalities were similar between groups. During the 6 months after study completion, a low incidence of CMV disease was observed in both groups.
                Longer-term effects of extended prophylaxis were not assessed.
                In adult lung transplant recipients who have received 3 months of valganciclovir, extending prophylaxis by an additional 9 months significantly reduces CMV infection, disease, and disease severity without increased ganciclovir resistance or toxicity. A beneficial effect with regard to prevention of CMV disease seems to extend at least through 18 months after transplantation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a frequent cause of serious morbidity after solid-organ transplantation. The prophylactic regimens used to prevent CMV infection and disease have shown limited benefit in seronegative recipients. We studied the safety and efficacy of oral ganciclovir in the prevention of CMV disease following orthotopic liver transplantation.
                Between December, 1993, and April, 1995, 304 liver-transplant recipients were randomised to receive oral ganciclovir 1000 mg or matching placebo three times a day. Seronegative recipients of seronegative livers were excluded. Study drug was administered as soon as the patient was able to take medication by mouth (no later than day 10) until the 98th day after transplantation. Patients were assessed at specified times throughout the first 6 months after surgery for evidence of CMV infection, CMV disease, rejection, opportunistic infections, and possible drug toxicity.
                The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 6-month incidence of CMV disease was 29 (18.9%) of 154 in the placebo group, compared with seven (4.8%) of 150 in the ganciclovir group (p < 0.001). In the high-risk group of seronegative recipients (R-) of seropositive livers (D+), incidence of CMV disease was 11 (44.0%) of 25 in the placebo group, three (14.8%) of 21 in the ganciclovir group (p = 0.02). Significant benefit was also observed in those receiving antibodies to lymphocytes, where the incidence of CMV disease was 12 (32.9%) of 37 in the placebo group and two (4.6%) of 44 in the ganciclovir group (p = 0.002). Oral ganciclovir reduced the incidence of CMV infection (placebo 79 [51.5%] of 154; ganciclovir 37 [24.5%] of 150; p < 0.001) and also reduced symptomatic herpes-simplex infections (Kaplan-Meier estimates: placebo 36 [23.5%] of 154; ganciclovir five [3.5%] of 150; p < 0.001).
                Oral ganciclovir is a safe and effective method for the prevention of CMV disease after orthotopic liver transplantation. Cytomegalovirus is a major viral pathogen in patients who undergo renal transplantation, and cytomegalovirus disease is difficult to treat. We therefore conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of acyclovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of renal allografts from cadavers. Acyclovir was given orally in doses of 800 to 3200 mg per day, according to the patients' estimated level of renal function. Patients took the first dose of either acyclovir or placebo six hours before transplantation and continued to take the assigned medication for 12 weeks. Of 118 patients enrolled in the study, 104 completed at least 30 days on the study medication and were included in our analysis of the results. During the first year after transplantation, 4 of 53 patients (7.5 percent) in the acyclovir group had symptomatic cytomegalovirus disease, as compared with 15 of 51 (29 percent) in the placebo group (P = 0.002). There was a single case of cytomegalovirus pneumonia in the acyclovir group, as compared with nine in the placebo group. The greatest prophylactic benefit of acyclovir was observed among seronegative patients who had received a kidney from a seropositive donor; only one of six such patients in the acyclovir group had cytomegalovirus disease, as compared with all seven in the placebo group. Acyclovir decreased the incidence of documented cytomegalovirus infection (with or without symptomatic disease) to 36 percent from 61 percent among the patients who received the placebo (P = 0.011). Among the patients who received acyclovir, the rates of recovery of virus from the blood and urine were significantly reduced, but the rate of viral shedding from the pharynx was not significantly different from that in the placebo group. There were no differences between the groups in the frequency of adverse events or in the rate of survival of either grafts or patients. We conclude that the oral administration of acyclovir, beginning before the transplantation of a renal allograft from a cadaver, reduces the rate of cytomegalovirus infection and disease without affecting the survival rate of either grafts or patients. Unlike parenteral gancicovir, the efficacy of oral ganciclovir in the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplantation has not been well documented. This study prospectively evaluated the episodes of CMV infection within the first nine months after transplantation in renal transplant recipients treated prophylactically with oral ganciclovir (750 mg twice a day) over a period of 3 months (oral ganciclovir, N = 22), compared with patients randomly assigned as controls (controls, N = 22) who did not receive any anti-viral prophylaxis. Diagnosis of CMV infection at presentation included serological determination of CMV-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies, CMV immunofluorescence assay [standard culture tube and shell vial] (blood) and virus isolation (urine and tissue). CMV infection occurred in one patient (5%) in the oral ganciclovir group and 6 patients (27%) in the control group (p < 0.05). The episodes of biopsy proven allograft rejections were 5% (1/21) and 18% (4/22) in the oral ganciclovir and control groups, respectively. Except for one, none of these patients developed CMV infection either before or after rejection(s). Controlling for the reason (induction or treatment of rejection) for using cytolytic antibody therapies, we found that prophylactic oral ganciclovir was protective against CMV infection (adjusted risk reduction 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-0.98; p < 0.05). Neither, the CMV status of donors and recipients nor the treatment for acute rejection had any significant impact on the occurrence of CMV infections. Our results show that oral ganciclovir is an effective and well tolerated therapy in the prevention of CMV infection in renal transplant patients. Because of the immunosuppression required, heart-transplant recipients frequently have complications caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), including pneumonia, esophagitis, gastritis, and a syndrome of fever, hepatitis, and leukopenia. We undertook a controlled trial to evaluate the prophylactic administration of ganciclovir to prevent CMV-induced disease after heart transplantation.
                This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted at four centers. Before randomization, the patients were stratified into two groups: those who were seropositive for CMV before transplantation and those who were seronegative but who received hearts from seropositive donors. Ganciclovir was given intravenously at a dose of 5 mg per kilogram of body weight every 12 hours from postoperative day 1 through day 14, then at a dose of 6 mg per kilogram each day for 5 days per week until day 28.
                Among the seropositive patients, CMV illness occurred during the first 120 days after heart transplantation in 26 of 56 patients given placebo (46 percent), as compared with 5 of 56 patients treated with ganciclovir (9 percent) (P less than 0.001). Among 37 seronegative patients, CMV illness was frequent in both groups (placebo, 29 percent; ganciclovir, 35 percent; P not significant). From day 15 through day 60, the patients who took ganciclovir had significantly fewer urine cultures positive for CMV, but by day 90 there was no difference. More of the ganciclovir-treated patients had serum creatinine concentrations greater than or equal to 221 mumol per liter (2.5 mg per deciliter) (18 percent vs. 4 percent in the placebo group), but those elevations were transient.
                The prophylactic administration of ganciclovir after heart transplantation is safe, and in CMV-seropositive patients it reduces the incidence of CMV-induced illness. The optimal prophylactic regimen to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in orthotopic liver-transplant patients remains to be established. We tested whether a combination of intravenous ganciclovir (GCV) followed by high dosages of oral acyclovir (ACV) for 4 months provided a higher degree of protection from CMV than oral ACV alone.
                One hundred sixty-seven liver-transplant recipients were randomized to receive 120 days of antiviral treatment starting at the time of transplantation consisting of either ACV 800 mg orally four times daily (n=84) or 14 days of GCV 5 mg/kg intravenously every 12 hr followed by oral ACV 800 mg four times daily (n=83). Prospective laboratory and clinical surveillance was performed to determine primary endpoints (onset of CMV infection and CMV disease) and secondary endpoints (rates of fungal and bacterial infection, allograft rejection, and survival after transplantation). One-year event rates are presented as cumulative percentages.
                During the first year after transplantation, CMV infection developed in 57% of patients treated with ACV and in 37% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.001). CMV disease developed in 23% of patients treated with ACV and in 11% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.03). In seronegative recipients of allografts from CMV-seropositive donors (D+/R-), CMV disease developed in 58% of patients treated with ACV and in 25% of patients treated with GCV + ACV (P=0.04). In the D+/R- group, 54% of patients treated with ACV and 17% of patients treated with GCV + ACV developed infection with Candida albicans (P=0.05).
                Prophylaxis of CMV infection in liver-transplant patients with 14 days of intravenous GCV followed by high-dosage oral ACV is more effective than high-dosage oral ACV alone at reducing CMV infection and disease, even for patients in the D+/R- CMV serological group. Antiviral prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus has been associated with reduced risk of allograft rejection and improved allograft survival after renal transplantation. This phenomenon might not be fully explained by preventing the indirect effects of cytomegalovirus. The effect of antiviral agents on lymphocyte function in patients treated with modern immunosuppression has not been studied to date.
                Adult renal transplant recipients were assigned to 3-month prophylaxis with either valganciclovir (900 mg once daily; n=19) or valacyclovir (2 g four times daily; n=17) as part of an ongoing randomized trial. Subsets of lymphocytes, lymphocyte proliferation and/or cytokine production after in vitro mitogen stimulation were evaluated at the end of prophylaxis and 1 month after withdrawal of antiviral drugs.
                Lymphocyte proliferation was significantly decreased both after phytohemagglutinine (25% ±15% versus 32% ±18%; P=0.025) and concanavalin A stimulation (17% ±9% versus 25% ±16%; P=0.011) during valganciclovir, but not valacyclovir therapy. Moreover, a lower activated T-cell count (CD3(+)HLA-DR(+) cells) was noted in valganciclovir-treated patients (13% ±10% versus 17% ±12% of total CD3(+) T-cells; P=0.005).
                Valganciclovir suppresses lymphocyte proliferation and activation in patients after renal transplantation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a major complication of organ transplantation. We hypothesized that prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir would reduce the risk of CMV disease.
                A total of 208 CMV-negative recipients of a kidney from a seropositive donor and 408 CMV-positive recipients were randomly assigned to receive either 2 g of valacyclovir or placebo orally four times daily for 90 days after transplantation, with the dose adjusted according to renal function. The primary end point was laboratory-confirmed CMV disease in the first six months after transplantation.
                Treatment with valacyclovir reduced the incidence or delayed the onset of CMV disease in both the seronegative patients (P<0.001) and the seropositive patients (P=0.03). Among the seronegative patients, the incidence of CMV disease 90 days after transplantation was 45 percent among placebo recipients and 3 percent among valacyclovir recipients. Among the seropositive patients, the respective values were 6 percent and 0 percent. At six months, the incidence of CMV disease was 45 percent among seronegative recipients of placebo and 16 percent among seronegative recipients of valacyclovir; it was 6 percent among seropositive placebo recipients and 1 percent among seropositive valacyclovir recipients. At six months, the rate of biopsy-confirmed acute graft rejection in the seronegative group was 52 percent among placebo recipients and 26 percent among valacyclovir recipients (P=0.001). Treatment with valacyclovir also decreased the rates of CMV viremia and viruria, herpes simplex virus disease, and the use of inpatient medical resources. Hallucinations and confusion were more common with valacyclovir treatment, but these events were not severe or treatment-limiting. The rates of other adverse events were similar among the groups.
                Prophylactic treatment with valacyclovir is a safe and effective way to prevent CMV disease after renal transplantation. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most frequent infectious complication observed in renal-transplant recipients and induces a significant morbidity in these patients due to CMV disease itself and to associated renal dysfunction or opportunistic superinfection. In order to evaluate the effect of gangiclovir prophylaxis we conducted an open-label prospective randomized study of ganciclovir administration in CMV seronegative recipients of a renal allograft from CMV seropositive donors. Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d./day for 14 days) was started on day 14 after transplantation. Thirty-two patients were included in this study (15 in the control group, 17 in the ganciclovir group). There was no significant difference between the two groups for age, immunosuppressive regimen, number of rejection, steroid pulses, and OKT3 treatments. Renal and patient outcomes were similar in both groups. The rate of CMV infection and CMV disease were similar in both groups (80% and 73.3% in the control group versus 70.6% and 47.1% in the ganciclovir group; P = NS). Less severe CMV disease was observed in the ganciclovir group compared to controls. The delay between transplantation and CMV infection was significantly longer in the ganciclovir group compared to control group (68.1 +/- 5.1 versus 44.0 +/- 5.2 days, P < 0.005). Twelve group patients (80%) versus nine (53%) of the ganciclovir group required curative treatment with ganciclovir after the diagnosis of CMV infection (NS). All the patients recovered from CMV disease and no significant side effect was observed during ganciclovir administration.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) The potential of prophylactic ganciclovir for the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection was evaluated in a prospective controlled trial of 65 patients after liver transplantation. A group of 33 patients received ganciclovir (10 mg/kg/day) during the third and fourth weeks after transplantation, while 32 patients were randomised to receive ganciclovir (10 mg/kg/day) only when clinical CMV disease was diagnosed. Eight patients (25%) in the latter group received ganciclovir and included the only death attributed to CMV infection in the study. Prophylactic ganciclovir was associated with a lower incidence of serologically diagnosed secondary infection and the development of the IgM anti-CMV antibody. However, the frequency of clinical infections was similar in the two groups (9/33 vs. 11/32). Liver function tests during the second month after transplantation were not significantly better in the patients receiving prophylactic ganciclovir. Leucopaenia was not seen in patients receiving prophylactic ganciclovir. Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors have the greatest risk for CMV disease. We performed a randomized, controlled trial comparing sequential intravenous (IV) and oral ganciclovir with prolonged IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in these high-risk patients. Patients were initially given IV ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg per day from days 1 to 14 after transplantation. Patients then either received oral ganciclovir (1 g every 8 hr) or continued IV ganciclovir (6 mg/kg once per day on Monday-Friday of each week) from days 15 to 100 after transplantation. CMV disease occurred in 3 of 32 patients (9.3%) receiving oral ganciclovir and in 4 of 32 patients (12.5%) receiving IV ganciclovir within the first year after transplantation (P>0.2). All cases of CMV disease occurred more than 90 days after transplantation (median time of onset day +137 for oral ganciclovir and day +135 for IV ganciclovir). There were no deaths from CMV in either study group. Both oral and IV ganciclovir were generally well tolerated. These results indicate that, after induction with 14 days of IV ganciclovir, oral ganciclovir can be as effective as IV ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with CMV-seropositive donors and eliminates the need for prolonged IV access. Both oral ganciclovir and valacyclovir decrease the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after renal transplantation. Moreover, valacyclovir has been shown to reduce the risk of acute rejection. Our study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir and valacyclovir in the prophylaxis of CMV disease after renal transplantation.
                A total of 83 patients were prospectively randomized to 3-month treatment with oral ganciclovir (3 g/day, n=36, GAN) or oral valacyclovir (8 g/day, n=35, VAL). A control group (DEF, n=12) was managed by deferred therapy.
                No differences were found in demography, immunosuppression, or donor/recipient CMV serology. The 12-month incidence of CMV disease was 67% in the DEF group compared with 6% in the GAN group and 3% in the VAL group (P<0.001 GAN or VAL vs. DEF; P=0.575 GAN vs. VAL). The biopsy-confirmed acute rejection rate at 12 months was 12% in the VAL group compared with 34% in the GAN group (P=0.030) and 58% in the DEF group (P<0.001). The difference between the GAN and DEF groups was not significant (P=0.087). The average CMV-associated costs per patient were $3,072, $2,906, and $4,906 in the GAN, VAL, and DEF groups, respectively.
                Valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir are equally effective in the prevention of CMV disease after renal transplantation. Both regimens are cost-effective. Valacyclovir is associated with a significantly reduced risk of acute rejection compared with both ganciclovir prophylaxis and deferred therapy. Despite current approaches to prophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to be a common cause of infection and disease in solid-organ-transplant patients. Thus, we conducted a controlled trial comparing long-term administration of ganciclovir with high-dose acyclovir for prevention of CMV infection and disease in liver transplant recipients. At the time of transplant, patients were randomised to receive either ganciclovir (6 mg/kg body weight per day intravenously from postoperative day 1 to day 30, then 6 mg/kg per day Monday through Friday until day 100) or acyclovir (10 mg/kg intravenously every 8 h from postoperative day 1 to day of discharge, then 800 mg orally four times a day until day 100). Patients were followed for development of CMV infection, CMV disease, and drug-related toxicity by frequent cultures, serological tests, laboratory measurements, and tissue biopsies. During the first 120 days after transplant, CMV infection occurred in 48 of 126 (38%) acyclovir patients but in only 6 of 124 (5%) ganciclovir patients (p < 0.0001). Similarly, symptomatic CMV disease developed in 12 of 126 (10%) acyclovir patients but in only 1 of 124 (0.8%) ganciclovir patients (p = 0.002). Ganciclovir reduced the incidence of CMV infection in both CMV antibody positive (37 vs 4%, p = 0.001) and negative patients (42 vs 11%, p = 0.06). In a multivariate analysis of donor-recipient CMV antibody status and other risk factors, prophylactic ganciclovir was the most significant factor protecting against CMV infection (p < 0.0001) and disease (p = 0.001). Ganciclovir and acyclovir were generally well-tolerated. Incidences of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, and other adverse events were similar in the two groups. CMV can be eliminated almost completely as a significant pathogen in liver transplant recipients by the long-term administration of prophylactic ganciclovir. In addition, the treatment is safe. nan In an attempt to modify the sequelae of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections after lung transplantation, 25 allograft recipients were randomized to either ganciclovir 5 mg/kg once a day 5 d/wk (Group G) or acyclovir 800 mg four times a day (Group A). All subjects received ganciclovir during postoperative Weeks 1 through 3, and they were then given either A or G regimens until Day 90. At termination of study enrollment, the cumulative incidence of all CMV infections (including seroconversions) was increased in Group A compared with that in Group G (75% versus 15%, p < 0.01), as was the incidence of overt CMV shedding and/or pneumonitis (50% versus 15%, p < 0.043). In comparison with those in Group G, subjects in Group A were also afflicted with an increased prevalence of obliterative bronchiolitis (OB) during the first year after transplantation (54% versus 17%, p < 0.033). Intravenous catheters for ganciclovir administration resulted in four complications among three of the subjects in Group G (23%). The short-term benefits of ganciclovir were ultimately limited, moreover, in that cumulative rates of CMV and prevalence of OB are now similar in both treatment groups after approximately 2 yr of observation. We conclude that prolonged ganciclovir prophylaxis decreases the early incidence of CMV and OB among lung transplant recipients, but these effects are of finite duration. Although CMV prevention appears to have considerable potential value in this population, definitive viral prophylaxis will require development of protracted or repeated treatment regimens, or longer-acting agents. A randomized trial was performed to compare the sequential use of 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir (10 mg/[kg.d]) followed by 50 weeks of high-dose oral acyclovir (800 mg/m2 four times daily) with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir alone as prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) disease after pediatric liver transplantation. CMV disease was diagnosed for seven of 24 patients treated with ganciclovir followed by high-dose oral acyclovir compared with two of 24 children treated with ganciclovir alone (P = .048). Similarly, the rate of CMV disease among high-risk patients (CMV-positive donor/CMV-negative recipient) treated with the combination regimen was higher than that among high-risk patients treated with ganciclovir alone (four [57%] of seven vs. zero of five, respectively; vs P < .05). The rate of EBV disease among patients treated with the combination regimen (eight [33%] of 24) was similar to that among patients treated with ganciclovir alone (five [21%] of 24; P = not significant). We conclude that sequential prophylaxis with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir followed by 50 weeks of high-dose oral acyclovir did not decrease the frequency of CMV or EBV disease after pediatric liver transplantation when compared with 2 weeks of intravenous ganciclovir alone. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of oral versus intravenous ganciclovir in high-risk kidney recipients.
                Thirty-four, cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive recipients of kidneys from seropositive donors who had undergone antilymphocytic immunosuppressive therapy were assigned randomly to oral (1000 mg, three times a day, 12 weeks) versus intravenous (5 mg/kg, 2 weeks) ganciclovir prophylaxis. Follow-up was performed for 12 months. The patients were evaluated for clinical and laboratory outcomes regarding CMV serostatus, CMV disease, graft outcome, and ganciclovir side effects.
                Sixteen patients in the oral group and 14 in the intravenous group completed the study. CMV infection occurred in 6 (37.5%) and 5 (35.7%) cases in the oral and intravenous groups, respectively (P = NS). The mean interval between prophylaxis initiation and the first positive CMV Ag result was 3 +/- 2.19 months, with no significant difference between the two groups. Only two patients in the intravenous group experienced CMV diseases, which were not tissue-invasive. Acute rejection episodes were observed in nine out of 30 recipients, but it did not show any association with the prophylaxis regimen or CMV serostatus. The patients tolerated oral ganciclovir well; the compliance percent was 81.6%. No complication was reported.
                Oral and intravenous ganciclovir showed no significant difference to reduce the rate of CMV infection among high-risk kidney recipients. Oral ganciclovir was also effective and safe for the prevention of CMV disease. Moreover, it seems that CMV infection was not associated with acute rejection episodes. An open, prospective, randomised study was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of valacyclovir vs. oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Eighty-three renal transplant recipients were assigned randomly to receive valacyclovir (n=43) or oral ganciclovir (n=40) for the first 3 months after transplantation. Both groups were similar in terms of demographics, primary renal disease, graft source, HLA matching, immunosuppressive therapy and donor-recipient CMV antibody status. CMV infection was diagnosed by detection of virus DNA in plasma with the Amplicor CMV Test. CMV disease was observed in only one patient belonging to the ganciclovir group, who developed enterocolitis 6 months post-transplantation. No difference was observed between the two treatment groups with respect to detection of CMV DNA, virus infections other than CMV, acute rejection episodes, and serum creatinine levels at 3 and 6 months following transplantation. An increased number of bacterial infections was noted in the ganciclovir group (p 0.003). No adverse reactions with either treatment were reported. The estimated cost of valacyclovir treatment was 20% higher than that of ganciclovir treatment. Overall, both valacyclovir and oral ganciclovir were found to be effective and safe for CMV prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients. Decisions regarding prophylactic regimens should include additional criteria, such as cost or possible development of resistance. Late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a significant problem with a standard 3-month prophylaxis regimen. This multicentre, double-blind, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of 200 days' versus 100 days' valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) in 326 high-risk (D+/R-) kidney allograft recipients. Significantly fewer patients in the 200-day group versus the 100-day group developed confirmed CMV disease up to month 12 posttransplant (16.1% vs. 36.8%; p < 0.0001). Confirmed CMV viremia was also significantly lower in the 200-day group (37.4% vs. 50.9%; p = 0.015 at month 12). There was no significant difference in the rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection between the groups (11% vs. 17%, respectively, p = 0.114). Adverse events occurred at similar rates between the groups and the majority were rated mild-to-moderate in intensity and not related to study medication. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that extending valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg once daily) to 200 days significantly reduces the incidence of CMV disease and viremia through to 12 months compared with 100 days' prophylaxis, without significant additional safety concerns associated with longer treatment. The number needed to treat to avoid one additional patient with CMV disease up to 12 months posttransplant is approximately 5. Recent studies showed contradictory results concerning the efficacy of oral acyclovir in the prevention or amelioration of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after renal transplantation (TX). This study evaluated the incidence and severity of CMV disease within the first year after TX in high-risk renal transplant recipients (CMV-seropositive donor, seronegative recipient) treated prophylactically with oral acyclovir (800 to 3200 mg/day) over a period of 12 wk (ACY, N = 22), compared with high-risk patients randomly assigned as controls (CO, N = 10). Follow-up for CMV infection included serological determination of CMV-specific immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies, antigen detection in peripheral blood leukocytes (PP 65), shell vial culture (blood), and virus isolation/early antigen detection (urine). Severity of CMV disease was quantified by a scoring system for CMV-related symptoms. Nine patients (40.1%) in the acyclovir group and four patients (40%) in the control group developed CMV disease. Neither severity (ACY, 11.4 versus CO; 12.5 points score), nor duration of disease (ACY, 21 days; CO, 22 days), nor transplant function at the end of the observation period differed significantly. The onst of CMV disease was not delayed significantly in acyclovir-treated patients compared with controls (ACY, 47 +/- 34 days versus CO, 27 +/- 14 days after TX, not significant). Our results show no beneficial effect of oral acyclovir prophylaxis in CMV high-risk renal transplant recipients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is still a major pathogen in liver transplantation (LTX). The clinical efficacy of prophylactic high-dose acyclovir therapy (800 mg qid) was assessed for the prevention of CMV infection and disease in liver recipients. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial; 28 on acyclovir vs. 27 on placebo. The therapy was given for 12 weeks. The patients were followed for 24 weeks. CMV infection was diagnosed in 60% (16 on acyclovir, 17 on placebo) and CMV disease developed in 38% (7 on acyclovir, 14 on placebo) of the patients. The total mortality was 27% (6 on acyclovir, 10 on placebo). Acyclovir delayed 32% of the CMV infections and prevented 59% of the CMV disease cases which occurred in the placebo cohort. The time to CMV disease was significantly prolonged in patients on acyclovir as compared to patients on placebo (P=0.013). Adverse events included neurotoxicity which occurred in 5 cases in the acyclovir, but none in the placebo arm, and nephrotoxicity which was detected in 6 patients in the acyclovir and 5 in the placebo arm, respectively. We conclude that acyclovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CMV disease, and delayed the onset of CMV infection in liver transplant patients. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to determine whether a prolonged course of low-dose ganciclovir prevented the development of clinical cytomegalovirus disease after heart transplantation.
                Fifty-six consecutive patients were stratified into two groups: cytomegalovirus-positive recipients (n = 40) and cytomegalovirus-negative recipients of organs from cytomegalovirus-positive donors (n = 16). All patients received equine antithymocyte globulin induction for 7 days and maintenance doses of cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisolone. Ganciclovir (5 mg/kg intravenously) or matching placebo was given with the premedication, three times weekly for the first 6 weeks after transplantation and for another 2 weeks for each treated rejection episode between 6 and 12 weeks.
                Ganciclovir prophylaxis reduced the actuarial incidence of cytomegalovirus disease from 71% to 11% in cytomegalovirus-mismatched patients (p < 0.01). Ganciclovir prophylaxis did not reduce the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus-positive recipients (25% in both placebo and ganciclovir groups) but did delay its onset and reduce its morbidity. There were no adverse reactions during ganciclovir administration. Gastritis was the most common clinical manifestation of cytomegalovirus disease. Pneumonitis and myocarditis were seen only in placebo-treated cytomegalovirus-mismatched patients. All patients with clinical cytomegalovirus disease responded to ganciclovir, 10 mg/kg/day for 2 weeks.
                Prolonged low-dose ganciclovir prophylaxis after heart transplantation reduces the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus-mismatched patients and reduces the morbidity of cytomegalovirus disease in cytomegalovirus-positive recipients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a major cause of serious morbidity following solid organ transplantation via both direct and indirect mechanisms. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of valacyclovir prophylaxis in heart transplant recipients.
                Twenty-seven CMV seropositive adults due to receive a heart transplant were included in a single-center, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were randomized to receive either oral valacyclovir 2000 mg or oral acyclovir 200 mg four times daily starting within 3 days of heart transplant and continuing for 90 days. The primary outcome measure was time to development of CMV antigenemia assessed for 6 months after surgery. Other measures were time to asymptomatic CMV infection, symptomatic CMV infections, and end-organ CMV disease. Patients were monitored for other herpes infections, other opportunistic infections, and acute graft rejection. Safety was assessed by evaluating changes in hematology and clinical chemistry parameters and by the occurrence of adverse events.
                The median time to CMV antigenemia was 19 days for the acyclovir group compared with 119 days for the valacyclovir group (hazard ratio 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99; p = 0.049). Similar delays of approximately 100 days were found for CMV infection, symptomatic CMV infection, and CMV disease. There was also a trend for delayed acute rejection, and fewer opportunistic or other herpesvirus infections occurred in the valacyclovir group. Valacyclovir was well tolerated in the study population.
                Oral valacyclovir is a safe and effective mode of prophylaxis of CMV after heart transplantation. To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of preemptive ganciclovir therapy in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive renal transplant recipients treated with antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) preparations.
                A prospective, randomized trial at a 650-bed tertiary medical center hospital.
                Forty consecutive CMV-seropositive renal allograft recipients who underwent transplantation between January 1992 and January 1994 and were treated with ALA for induction immunosuppression or acute rejection therapy.
                The incidence and severity of CMV disease, length of hospitalization, and patient and allograft survival.
                Cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis by use of intravenous ganciclovir during ALA therapy was administered to 22 patients (group 1) and the results were compared with those obtained in 18 control patients who did not receive prophylaxis for CMV disease (group 2).
                Preemptive ganciclovir therapy significantly reduced the incidence of CMV disease (P < .05) in CMV-seropositive renal transplant patients who were treated with ALA and was well tolerated. In addition, the cost of prophylactic therapy was offset by the decreased length of hospitalization observed in patients in group 1.
                Preemptive ganciclovir therapy provides a cost-effective approach toward significantly improving the outcome of renal transplantation in CMV-seropositive patients treated with ALA. Cytomegalovirus disease is an important cause of morbidity following liver transplantation. To date there has not been an effective prophylaxis for CMV disease after liver transplantation. One hundred forty-three patients were randomized to receive either high dose oral acyclovir (800 mg 4 times a day) alone for 3 months after transplantation (acyclovir group) or intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg twice a day) for 14 days followed by high dose oral acyclovir to complete a 3-month regimen (ganciclovir group). Of 139 patients available for evaluation, 43 of 71 (61%) patients from the acyclovir group developed CMV infection compared with 16 of 68 (24%) from the ganciclovir group (relative risk, 3.69; 95% confidence interval, 2.07-6.56; P < 0.00001). Of those randomized, CMV disease was seen in 20 (28%) of the acyclovir group compared with 6 (9%) of the ganciclovir group (relative risk, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-12.75; P = 0.0001). The median time to onset of CMV infection was 45 days in the acyclovir group compared with 78 days in the ganciclovir group (P = 0.004). The median time to onset of CMV disease was 40 days in the acyclovir group compared with 78 days in the ganciclovir patients (P = 0.02). With respect to primary CMV infection, there was no difference in the rates in the 2 groups, but tissue invasive disease and recurrent CMV disease were less frequent in the ganciclovir group. It is concluded that a course of 2 weeks of ganciclovir immediately after transplantation followed by high dose oral acyclovir for 10 weeks is superior to a 12-week course of high dose oral acyclovir alone for prevention of both CMV infection and CMV disease after liver transplantation. However, the lack of significant effect in seronegative recipients who received grafts from seropositive donors suggests that other strategies are needed to prevent CMV infection in this high risk population. To determine whether preemptive ganciclovir therapy administered daily during antilymphocyte antibody therapy can prevent cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients who are positive for cytomegalovirus antibody.
                Randomized, controlled, multicenter trial.
                6 university-affiliated transplantation centers.
                113 renal transplant recipients who were positive for cytomegalovirus antibody.
                Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1) ganciclovir, 2.5 mg/kg body weight administered intravenously on every day that antilymphocyte antibody therapy was administered or 2) no anticytomegalovirus therapy.
                Patients were observed for 6 months after completion of antilymphocyte antibody therapy for development of cytomegalovirus disease and cytomegalovirus viremia.
                Cytomegalovirus disease occurred in 14% of patients (9 of 64) who received preemptive ganciclovir therapy and in 33% of controls (16 of 49) (P = 0.018). Cytomegalovirus was isolated from buffy-coat specimens from 17% of patients (11 of 64) receiving preemptive ganciclovir and from 35% of controls (17 of 49) (P = 0.03). Controlling for the reason (induction or treatment of rejection) for using antilymphocyte antibodies in a Cox proportional hazards model, we found that preemptive ganciclovir still protected against cytomegalovirus disease (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.64). No adverse events were attributed to preemptive ganciclovir therapy during or within 6 months of its administration.
                Preemptive ganciclovir therapy administered daily during courses of treatment with antilymphocyte antibodies reduced the excessive occurrence of cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients who were positive for cytomegalovirus antibody. This approach, which links the most potent immunosuppression to intensive antimicrobial therapy, allows preventive therapy to be given to those patients at greatest risk for developing infectious complications. These patients are likely to benefit most from the preventive strategy. nan We compared the efficacy and safety of valganciclovir with those of oral ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in high-risk seronegative solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-). In this randomised, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy study, 364 CMV D+/R- patients received valganciclovir 900 mg once daily or oral ganciclovir 1000 mg three times a day (tid) within 10 days of transplant and continued through 100 days. CMV disease, plasma viremia, acute graft rejection, graft loss and safety were analyzed up to 6 and 12 months post-transplant. Endpoint committee-defined CMV disease developed in 12.1% and 15.2% of valganciclovir and ganciclovir patients, respectively, by 6 months, though with a difference in the relative efficacy of valganciclovir and ganciclovir between organs (i.e. an organ type-treatment interaction). By 12 months, respective incidences were 17.2% and 18.4%, and the incidence of investigator-treated CMV disease events was comparable in the valganciclovir (30.5%) and ganciclovir (28.0%) arms. CMV viremia during prophylaxis was significantly lower with valganciclovir (2.9% vs. 10.4%; p=0.001), but was comparable by 12 months (48.5% valganciclovir vs 48.8% ganciclovir). Time-to-onset of CMV disease and to viremia were delayed with valganciclovir; rates of acute allograft rejection were generally lower with valganciclovir. Except for a higher incidence of neutropenia with valganciclovir (8.2%, vs 3.2% ganciclovir) the safety profile was similar for both drugs. Overall, once-daily oral valganciclovir was as clinically effective and well-tolerated as oral ganciclovir tid for CMV prevention in high-risk SOT recipients. Cytomegalovirus is an important cause of morbidity and mortality risk after lung transplantation. Ganciclovir, when given for a period of up to 3 months after lung transplantation, has been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of cytomegalovirus. However, daily prophylaxis is associated with considerable expense, inconvenience, and morbidity risk. The goal of this study was to determine whether 3-times-weekly dosage is as effective as daily prophylaxis with ganciclovir in preventing cytomegalovirus disease.
                Seventy-two consecutive subjects who had either donor or recipient cytomegalovirus seropositivity were randomized to the daily group (n = 35) or the 3-times-weekly group (n = 37). All subjects received twice-daily ganciclovir treatment for 2 weeks. Thereafter, subjects received either daily or 3-times-weekly ganciclovir dosing until 90 days after transplantation. Subjects were then monitored for 28 +/- 13 months to identify outcomes and complications.
                There were no significant differences between the daily and 3-times-weekly groups with respect to survival free from cytomegalovirus infection or survival free from cytomegalovirus disease. In both groups, cytomegalovirus infection and disease frequently emerged after the termination of prophylaxis. However, in most cases the cytomegalovirus syndromes observed were mild and in many cases could be treated on an outpatient basis. There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of obliterative bronchiolitis or time to onset of grade 2 bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Overall patient survival was better in the daily group, but the survival advantage did not appear to be related to a reduction in cytomegalovirus-related disease. Complications of ganciclovir prophylaxis included leukopenia in 2 subjects in the 3-times-weekly group and catheter-related sepsis in 6 subjects from each group.
                We conclude that intravenous ganciclovir given 3 times weekly for 3 months after transplantation is as effective as daily ganciclovir given for a similar time period. The 3-times-weekly dosing regimen did not result in increased infection, disease, or sequelae of cytomegalovirus infection when compared with the daily regimen. nan Without effective antiviral prophylaxis, cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease is a common cause of morbidity and mortality after liver transplantation. In this randomized, controlled trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of oral ganciclovir with oral acyclovir after induction with intravenous (IV) ganciclovir for long-term prophylaxis of CMV disease in CMV-seropositive liver transplant recipients.
                Patients were initially administered IV ganciclovir at a dose of 6 mg/kg per day from day 1 to day 14 after transplantation followed by either oral ganciclovir (1 g every 8 hr) or oral acyclovir (800 mg every 6 hr) from day 15 to day 100 after transplantation.
                CMV disease occurred in only 1 of 110 patients (0.9%) receiving ganciclovir compared with 8 of 109 patients (7.3%) receiving acyclovir within the first year after transplantation (P =0.019). There was one case of CMV colitis in the ganciclovir group, whereas four cases of CMV syndrome, three cases of CMV pneumonia, and one case of CMV hepatitis developed in the acyclovir group. The only death from CMV disease occurred in an acyclovir-treated patient with CMV pneumonia. Both oral ganciclovir and oral acyclovir were generally well tolerated. Reversible leukopenia (decline in white blood cell count to <3.0 x 10(9)/L) was more common with oral ganciclovir (38/110 patients, 35%) than with oral acyclovir (20/109 patients, 18%) (P =0.009). The emergence of ganciclovir-resistant strains of CMV was not found during the study.
                A prophylactic regimen of 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir followed by an additional 12 weeks of oral ganciclovir is superior to a similar regimen of IV ganciclovir followed by oral acyclovir and almost completely eliminates CMV disease after liver transplantation. This superior protection against CMV disease extends up to 1 year after transplantation and is not associated with ganciclovir resistance.