Comparison of intravenous aminoglycoside therapy with switch therapy to cefixime in urinary tract infections. Single dose gentamicin treatment of urinary infections in children. [Comparative, controlled study on an ampicillin suppository (KS-R 1) with an oral form of ampicillin in urinary tract infections]. Randomized, controlled trial comparing once daily and three times daily gentamicin in children with urinary tract infections. Single-dose cefotaxime in the treatment of urinary tract infections in children: a randomized clinical trial. The addition of ceftriaxone to oral therapy does not improve outcome in febrile children with urinary tract infections. Effective duration of antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of acute lobar nephronia. Antibiotic treatment for pyelonephritis in children: multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Comparison of ceftriaxone versus cefotaxime for childhood upper urinary tract infections. Oral versus initial intravenous therapy for urinary tract infections in young febrile children. Urinary tract infections with tissue penetration in children: cefotaxime compared with amoxycillin/clavulanate. Effectiveness of cefetamet pivoxil in the treatment of pyelonephritis in children. Oral ceftibuten switch therapy for acute pyelonephritis in children. Isepamicin versus amikacin for the treatment of acute pyelonephritis in children. Randomised controlled trial of three day versus 10 day intravenous antibiotics in acute pyelonephritis: effect on renal scarring. Comparison of 5 milligrams of netilmicin per kilogram of body weight once daily versus 2 milligrams per kilogram thrice daily for treatment of gram-negative pyelonephritis in children. The length of antimicrobial therapy in upper vs. lower urinary tract infection of childhood. Cefepine vs. ceftazidime treatment of pyelonephritis: a European, randomized, controlled study of 300 pediatric cases. European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases (ESPID) Pyelonephritis Study Group. Treatment of children with acute pyelonephritis: a prospective randomized study.
nan Sixty-nine children with urinary tract infections were randomly allocated to single dose gentamicin therapy (n = 39) or a seven day course of an appropriate antibiotic (n = 30). During the following six weeks the response to treatments did not differ and this was not altered by the child's clinical diagnosis, past history of infection or presence of radiological abnormalities. The poorest response was in those children with a history of recurrent infections (p less than 0.01) and/or radiological abnormality (p less than 0.02). Single dose therapy had significantly less suppression upon rectal (p less than 0.001) and periurethral (p less than 0.02) flora. There was a tendency for those not cured by single dose treatment to relapse whereas those treated by conventional therapy tended to be reinfected. Subjects were in-patients with bacterial urinary tract infections, ranging in age 4 months to 11 years 4 months. As a rule, daily dose was either four 125 mg (in potency) suppositories or four 125 mg (in potency) oral form given at 6-hour intervals over a period of 5 days. The number of children subjected to this study was 105. These children were divided into 2 groups (suppository 54; oral form 51) with matched pretreatment background factors. Therapeutic effectiveness rates were 70.4% for the suppository and 66.7% for the oral form, and no significant difference was observed between the 2 groups. Rates of efficacy by severity, presence or absence of underlying and/or complication diseases, daily dose and causative microorganisms did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in time-courses of improvement of clinical signs and symptoms between the 2 groups. Eradication rates for causative microorganisms were 65.9% for the suppository and 62.5% for the oral form. Most frequently isolated causative microorganisms were Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis. No significant differences were recognized in the therapeutic effect and usefulness evaluated by physicians in charge. The frequency of side effects did not differ significantly between the suppository group (6 with diarrhea and 1 with anal pain: 12.1%) and the oral form group (5 with diarrhea, 1 with displeasure and 1 with vomiting: 12.7%). Abnormal laboratory findings appeared in 6 cases (2 with eosinophilia, 2 with increased GOT and 2 with increased GPT) in the suppository group and 7 cases (2 with eosinophilia, 2 with thrombocytosis, 2 with increased GOT and 1 with increased GPT) in the oral form group. To undertake population pharmacokinetic modeling and to determine the safety and efficacy of once daily (OD) gentamicin dosing in children with severe urinary tract infections (UTI).
                An open, randomized, controlled trial comparing OD with three times daily (TD) gentamicin dosing in hospitalized children ages 1 month to 12 years with UTI. Daily doses (milligrams per kg per day) of gentamicin in both groups were 7.5 (<5 years old), 6.0 (5 to 10 years old) and 4.5 (>10 years old).
                There were 179 children enrolled (90 OD, 89 TD). Baseline clinical characteristics and pathogens were similar, except that circulatory compromise and renal cortical scintigraphic defects were more common in the OD group. Median gentamicin treatment durations were 3.0 (OD) and 2.7 (TD) days. Mean peak gentamicin concentrations were 17.3 (OD) vs. 6.4 (TD) mg/l; 99% of peak concentrations were >7 mg/l in the OD group whereas 16% of peak concentrations were <5 mg/l in the TD group. Mean trough concentrations were 0.35 (OD) vs. 0.55 (TD) mg/l. In the OD group 4% of trough concentrations were > or = 2 mg/l, whereas in the TD group only 0.7% were > or = 2 mg/l. Age or prior elevated peak concentrations did not predict high trough concentrations. Population pharmacokinetic modeling of the data fitted a one-compartment model with first order elimination. There were no clinical or bacteriologic failures. The two disease-related complications were confined to the OD group. No nephro- or ototoxicity was identified.
                With age-appropriate dosing and measurement of serum trough concentrations before the second dose, OD gentamicin is safe and effective for the treatment of UTI requiring parenteral treatment in children aged 1 month to 12 years. Thirty-seven patients with a median age of 5 years with symptomatic lower or upper urinary tract infection, documented by a clean-catch midstream urine culture and sediment examination, completed a randomized study comparing the effectiveness of a single dose of cefotaxime with 10-day treatment with an antibiotic chosen by in-vitro sensitivities. Eighteen patients were randomly assigned to the cefotaxime group (50 mg/kg/im route) and 19 patients were placed in the 10-day therapy group. In the cefotaxime group 4/18 patients had an upper urinary tract infection and 11/18 had a history of recurrences. The causal organisms were Escherichia coli (16 cases) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (two cases). All patients had sterile urine 48 hours after therapy, and 2/18 cases had recurred 28 days later. In the 10-day treatment group, 7/19 patients had an upper urinary tract infection, 6/19 had a history of recurrences, 17 cases were caused by E. coli, one case by Citrobacter freundii and one case by K. pneumoniae. Eighteen of 19 patients had sterile urine 48 hours after therapy and 1 case remained symptomatic with positive culture. The other 18 patients had no recurrences. Rates of cures and recurrence in the compared groups were not statistically different (P greater than 0.05). To determine whether the addition of a single dose of ceftriaxone sodium to a 10-day course of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole hastens urine sterilization or resolution of clinical symptoms in febrile children with urinary tract infections.
                Prospective, single-blind, randomized study.
                Tertiary care children's hospital emergency department.
                Febrile children aged 6 months to 12 years with a presumptive urinary tract infection based on history, physical examination, and urinalysis findings.
                A history was taken, a physical examination and urinalysis and culture were performed, and a white blood cell count and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were obtained. Children were randomized to receive an intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone then 10 days of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (IM + PO group) or oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole alone (PO group). After receiving study medication, patients were discharged from the hospital to return in 48 hours for a follow-up evaluation and urine culture. Treatment failure was defined as the persistence of a positive culture at 48 hours or the need for hospital admission for intravenous rehydration or antibiotic therapy.
                Sixty-nine children were enrolled, 34 in the IM + PO group and 35 in the PO group. The 2 groups were similar at the initial visit with respect to age, sex, clinical degrees of illness, white blood cell count, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P>.05). At the 48-hour follow-up visit, there were no differences between the 2 treatment groups in resolution of vomiting, fever, general appearance, abdominal tenderness, and hydration state (P>.05). There were 9 treatment failures, 4 in the IM + PO group and 5 in the PO group (P =.93).
                The addition of a single dose of intramuscular ceftriaxone to a 10-day course of oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for urinary tract infection with fever resulted in no difference at 48 hours in the urine sterilization rate, degree of clinical improvement, or subsequent hospital admission rate. Effective treatment of acute lobar nephronia (ALN) can prevent its progression to renal abscess. The goal of this prospective study was to compare the treatment efficacy for pediatric patients who had ALN with a 3- vs 2-week intravenous plus oral antimicrobial-therapy regimen.
                Patients who were suspected of having an upper urinary tract infection underwent a systematic scheme of ultrasonographic and computed tomographic (CT) evaluation for ALN diagnosis. Patients with positive CT findings were enrolled and randomly allocated with serial entry for either a total 2-week or a 3-week antibiotic treatment regimen. Antibiotics were changed from an intravenous form to an oral form 2 to 3 days after defervescence of fever. Follow-up clinical evaluations and urine-culture analyses were performed 3 to 7 days after cessation of antibiotic treatment. Patients with persistent infection or relapse were considered as treatment failures.
                A total of 80 patients with ALN were enrolled. Forty-one patients were treated with a 2-week antimicrobial protocol, and the other 39 patients were treated with a 3-week course. Seven treatment failures, 1 persistent infection, and 6 infection relapses were identified, all of which were in the 2-week treatment group. Prolonged fever before admission and positive Escherichia coli growth (>10(5) colony-forming units per mL) in urine culture were noted as risk factors for treatment failure. All treatment failures were managed successfully with an additional 10-day antibiotic course.
                A total of 3 weeks of intravenous and oral antibiotic therapy tailored to the pathogen noted in cultures should be the treatment of choice for pediatric patients with ALN. To compare the efficacy of oral antibiotic treatment alone with treatment started parenterally and completed orally in children with a first episode of acute pyelonephritis.
                Multicentre, randomised controlled, open labelled, parallel group, non-inferiority trial.
                28 paediatric units in north east Italy.
                502 children aged 1 month to <7 years with clinical pyelonephritis.
                Oral co-amoxiclav (50 mg/kg/day in three doses for 10 days) or parenteral ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg/day in a single parenteral dose) for three days, followed by oral co-amoxiclav (50 mg/kg/day in three divided doses for seven days). Main outcomes measures Primary outcome was the rate of renal scarring. Secondary measures of efficacy were time to defervescence (<37 degrees C), reduction in inflammatory indices, and percentage with sterile urine after 72 hours. An exploratory subgroup analysis was conducted in the children in whom pyelonephritis was confirmed by dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy within 10 days after study entry.
                Intention to treat analysis showed no significant differences between oral (n=244) and parenteral (n=258) treatment, both in the primary outcome (scarring scintigraphy at 12 months 27/197 (13.7%) v 36/203 (17.7%), difference in risk -4%, 95% confidence interval -11.1% to 3.1%) and secondary outcomes (time to defervescence 36.9 hours (SD 19.7) v 34.3 hours (SD 20), mean difference 2.6 (-0.9 to 6.0); white cell count 9.8x10(9)/l (SD 3.5) v 9.5x10(9)/l (SD 3.1), mean difference 0.3 (-0.3 to 0.9); percentage with sterile urine 185/186 v 203/204, risk difference -0.05% (-1.5% to 1.4%)). Similar results were found in the subgroup of 278 children with confirmed acute pyelonephritis on scintigraphy at study entry.
                Treatment with oral antibiotics is as effective as parenteral then oral treatment in the management of the first episode of clinical pyelonephritis in children.
                Clinical Trials NCT00161330 [ClinicalTrials.gov]. It is very important to treat patients with upper urinary tract infections (UTIs) promptly and effectively because of the potential sequelae. In the present study we compare the efficacy of the two cephalosporins, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, in childhood pyelonephritis. The study protocal included 10 days of drug therapy. Both in patients receiving ceftriaxone and cefotaxime, successful eradication was achieved at the second day of therapy. The overall cure rate was significantly better in the ceftriaxone group than the cefotaxime group in terms of recurrence and reinfections (p < 0.05). Furthermore, in the complicated group, ceftriaxone was slightly superior to cefotaxime, approaching significance in terms of preventing recurrent infections. No serious adverse effects were observed in either of the groups. The present study has shown that ceftriaxone exhibits favorable clinical and bacteriologic efficacy in patients with complicated and uncomplicated upper UTI. Once-daily injection of ceftriaxone in children is also an attractive advantage of the drug when compared to twice-daily cefotaxime. The standard recommendation for treatment of young, febrile children with urinary tract infection has been hospitalization for intravenous antimicrobials. The availability of potent, oral, third-generation cephalosporins as well as interest in cost containment and avoidance of nosocomial risks prompted evaluation of the safety and efficacy of outpatient therapy.
                In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of oral versus initial intravenous therapy in 306 children 1 to 24 months old with fever and urinary tract infection, in terms of short-term clinical outcomes (sterilization of the urine and defervescence) and long-term morbidity (incidence of reinfection and incidence and extent of renal scarring documented at 6 months by 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scans). Children received either oral cefixime for 14 days (double dose on day 1) or initial intravenous cefotaxime for 3 days followed by oral cefixime for 11 days.
                Treatment groups were comparable regarding demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics. Bacteremia was present in 3.4% of children treated orally and 5.3% of children treated intravenously. Of the short-term outcomes, 1) repeat urine cultures were sterile within 24 hours in all children, and 2) mean time to defervescence was 25 and 24 hours for children treated orally and intravenously, respectively. Of the long-term outcomes, 1) symptomatic reinfections occurred in 4.6% of children treated orally and 7.2% of children treated intravenously, 2) renal scarring at 6 months was noted in 9.8% children treated orally versus 7.2% of children treated intravenously, and 3) mean extent of scarring was approximately 8% in both treatment groups. Mean costs were at least twofold higher for children treated intravenously ($3577 vs $1473) compared with those treated orally.
                Oral cefixime can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for children with fever and urinary tract infection. Use of cefixime will result in substantial reductions of health care expenditures. In children, the site of urinary tract infection (acute pyelonephritis or cystitis) cannot usually be accurately determined from the clinical presentation. The severity of the urinary tract infection (risk of renal scars) is best correlated with its estimated degree of tissue penetration clinically (fever, general condition) and on laboratory tests (sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein). The duration of parenteral antibiotic therapy, especially in children (taking account of difficult venous access and the cost of hospitalization) needs to be specified beyond the initial period required for sterilization of the urine (usually less than 48 h). We conducted a study in children older than one year to compare the efficacy and tolerance of two treatment regimens for urinary tract infection with tissue penetration: cefotaxime 100 mg/kg/d in four divided iv doses for 14 days (group I) and amoxycillin/clavulanate 100 mg/kg/d in four divided iv doses for seven days with conversion to the oral route at a dosage of 50 mg/kg/d for seven days (group II). The randomised protocol included ten patients in each group, comparable with respect to sex, age and history. Clinical efficacy (time until the patient became afebrile), bacteriological efficacy (sterilization of the urine), and biological efficacy (time to normalization of the indices of the acute inflammatory response) were identical for both groups regardless of the duration of iv antibiotic treatment (seven days for amoxycillin/clavulanate; 14 days for cefotaxime). The only side effect was diarrhoea, which affected three patients and did not require modification of the oral treatment regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Cefetamet pivoxil was investigated in an open, randomized comparative study involving a total of 37 children with acute pyelonephritis, whose ages ranged from 2 to 14 years. The patients received either 10 mg/kg (n = 18) or 20 mg/kg (n = 8) cefetamet pivoxil twice daily, or 30-50 mg/kg amoxycillin/clavulanic acid three times daily (n = 11) for a period of 7-10 days. Escherichia coli was the main causative agent isolated in 28 (75.7%) of the patients; other pathogens included Proteus mirabilis (three patients). Proteus species (one patient), Klebsiella pneumoniae (two patients), Pseudomonas diminuta (one patient) and mixed infections (three patients). No differences in the overall treatment outcome could be observed between the treatment regimens used and, at the end of treatment, all pathogens were eradicated with neither relapse, nor persistence of the isolated pathogen, nor reinfection occurring. The clinical signs and symptoms had subsided in all patients at treatment end and the tolerability of the trial drugs was found to be satisfactory with no premature treatment withdrawal required. It is concluded that cefetamet pivoxil in the standard twice-daily dose of 10 mg/kg was equally effective and as well tolerated as 20 mg/kg cefetamet pivoxil given twice daily or 30-50 mg/kg amoxycillin/clavulanic acid given three times daily. The available oral third generation of cephalosporin, "ceftibuten" was used to substitute the intravenous drug after defervescence in acute pyelonephritis in children. This randomized controlled study compared the efficacy of an oral ceftibuten switch therapy with a ceftriaxone in both short-term and long-term outcomes. 36 99mTc-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scan proved pyelonephritis patients were randomized into the study group, "ceftibuten" (N=18) and the control group, "ceftriaxone" (N=18). Ceftriaxone (75 mg/kg/day) was the initial antibiotic in both groups. After defervescence for 24-48 hours, oral ceftibuten (9 mg/kg/day) was substituted in the study group and continued for 10 days. The subject characteristics and laboratory data were not different between the two groups. The urine culture at D14 was sterilized in both groups. The incidence of renal scarring was 66.6 per cent and 61.1 per cent in the study group and the control group respectively. The rate of recurrent infection showed no statistical significance. The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the study group than in the control. In conclusion, oral ceftibuten switch therapy can be recommended as a safe and effective treatment for acute pyelonephritis in children. The use of oral therapy may result in a significant reduction of health care expenditure. In this study we compared the efficacy and safety of isepamicin versus amikacin at a dose of 7.5 mg/kg i.v. q12h for 10-14 days in children with pyelonephritis. Sixteen children were enrolled in the study; ten received isepamicin and six amikacin. Urine cultures grew Escherichia coli in all patients. All patients were treated successfully with either isepamicin or amikacin. Clinical and bacteriological response rates were 100% for both groups. No adverse events occurred. Peak serum levels ranged from 9.05 to 30.70 mg/l (median: 16.165) and from 12.20 to 25.90 mg/l (median: 19.05) for isepamicin and amikacin, respectively. Trough serum levels ranged from 0.11 to 3.20 mg/l (median: 0.75) and from 0.1 to 2.1 mg/l (median: 0.655), respectively. Isepamicin was shown to be as effective and safe as amikacin in the treatment of children with pyelonephritis and might prove an advantageous alternative in areas with high incidence of resistance to other aminoglycosides. Acute pyelonephritis often leaves children with permanent renal scarring.
                To compare the prevalence of scarring following initial treatment with antibiotics administered intravenously for 10 or three days.
                In a prospective two centre trial, 220 patients aged 3 months to 16 years with positive urine culture and acute renal lesions on initial DMSA scintigraphy, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous ceftriaxone (50 mg/kg once daily) for 10 or three days, followed by oral cefixime (4 mg/kg twice daily) to complete a 15 day course. After three months, scintigraphy was repeated in order to diagnose renal scars.
                Renal scarring developed in 33% of the 110 children in the 10 day intravenous group and 36% of the 110 children in the three day group. Children older than 1 year had more renal scarring than infants (42% (54/129) and 24% (22/91), respectively). After adjustment for age, sex, duration of fever before treatment, degree of inflammation, presence of vesicoureteric reflux, and the patients' recruitment centres, there was no significant difference between the two treatments on renal scarring. During follow up, 15 children had recurrence of urinary infection with no significant difference between the two treatment groups.
                In children with acute pyelonephritis, initial intravenous treatment for 10 days, compared with three days, does not significantly reduce the development of renal scarring. The efficacy and safety of netilmicin, 5 mg/kg of body weight once daily or 2 mg/kg thrice daily for 10 days, for the treatment of gram-negative pyelonephritis in children were compared in a prospective, randomized trial. Explicit criteria were used to define the site of infection, treatment outcome, and adverse effects. Netilmicin was given to 74 children once daily and to 70 children three times daily. At 1 week posttreatment, 73 (99%) of 74 children treated with netilmicin once daily and 70 (100%) of 70 children treated with netilmicin three times daily were cured. At 4 weeks posttreatment, no relapse was detected and the rate of reinfection was essentially identical in the two treatment groups. Peak serum netilmicin concentrations were higher in patients given the once-daily regimen, whereas a higher trough level was detected in patients given the three-times-daily regimen. Nephrotoxicity, which was defined as an increase in the serum creatinine level of greater than or equal to 0.3 mg/dl over the baseline, was rare (3%) and reversible and occurred regardless of the treatment regimen. Ototoxicity, which was assessed by pure-tone audiometry (250 to 8,000 Hz) and brain stem-evoked response (6,000 Hz), occurred in 2 of 32 children who were evaluated. In these two children, who were given the once-daily regimen, wave V was not evokable monolaterally below 25 and 40 dB normal hearing level, respectively. Thus, it may be possible to treat childhood pyelonephritis with netilmicin once daily. However, this new approach needs to be confirmed in other studies. 235 infants and children were randomized to a 10-day and 42-day treatment group and followed-up for 12 months after their first urinary tract infection. The anatomical level of each symptomatic infection was determined using simple laboratory criteria. The two regimens prescribed were equally effective in eradicating the infection, but after the discontinuation of the 10-day treatment with sulfafurazole, 17 (23%) of 73 patients with their upper urinary tract infection experienced a recurrence within one month, as compared to only one (1) of 76 subjects in the 42-day therapy group. After the phase of early recurrence, there was no difference in recurrence rate between these groups. The early recurrences were associated with the patient's early age and a short duration of symptoms before therapy. The recurrence rate of first lower UTI after 10-day therapy was significantly lower than that after 42-day treatment. The duration of antimicrobial therapy for childhood urinary tract infection should be adjusted according to the patient's age and the anatomical level of the infection. 10-day treatment may not be sufficient to prevent early recurrence of pyelonephritic infections in infants under 6 months of age. Cefepime has been used in clinical therapeutic trials for meningitis, serious infection and febrile neutropenia, comprising more than 800 pediatric patients. This agent has also been used in patients 12 years of age and older with uncomplicated and complicated urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis, but not in younger patients. In this study the safety and efficacy of cefepime were compared with those of ceftazidime for treatment of pyelonephritis in pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age.
                Two hundred ninety-nine pediatric patients (ages 1 month to 12 years) with pyelonephritis (300 episodes) were enrolled in a randomized, open label, multicenter trial. Individual results were evaluated by a blinded committee of experts. Cefepime was compared with ceftazidime, both administered parenterally at 50 mg/kg every 8 h. Patients were to receive the assigned study drug until at least 48 h after becoming afebrile. The i.v. treatment was then to be continued or replaced by oral trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole for a maximum of 12 to 14 days.
                The predominant causative pathogens were Escherichia coli, 88%; Proteus spp., 6%; Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2%; and Klebsiella spp., 2%. Bacteriologic eradication was achieved in 96 and 94% of cefepime and ceftazidime patients, respectively, at the end of i.v. study drug treatment and was maintained in 94 and 91%, respectively, at the end of total study therapy. After study therapy bacteriologic eradication was maintained after 4 to 6 weeks in 86% of cefepime cases and in 83% of ceftazidime cases. A satisfactory clinical response occurred in 98 and 96% of cefepime and ceftazidime patients, respectively, at the end of i.v. treatment and in 93% at the end of total study therapy in both treatment arms. Drug-related clinical adverse events occurred in 14 cefepime patients (91%) and in 10 ceftazidime patients (7%).
                Cefepime and ceftazidime are equally safe and efficacious treatment for pyelonephritis in pediatric patients. The aim of this study was to compare, in children with acute pyelonephritis, the efficacy of 7 days' (group A) and 3 days' (group B) intravenous antibiotics, both followed by an oral treatment. Children were randomized after 3 days of intravenous treatment. Technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) scintigraphy was performed within the first days after admission and repeated 6 months later. Total or partial persistence of renal abnormalities on the 6-month DMSA scintigraphy was used as the endpoint of the study. Among the 92 children included in the study, 87 were followed for at least 6 months (43 in group A and 44 in group B) and were eligible for analysis. Late DMSA was abnormal in 9 kidneys of group A and 12 kidneys of group B, representing respectively 24% and 44% of kidneys with abnormalities on the initial DMSA (difference statistically not significant). When the patients were stratified according to the delay of treatment, the percentage of patients with sequelae in group A was comparable, whether the delay was less or more than 1 week. In group B, the percentage of patients with sequelae was significantly higher (P<0.01) when the delay was more than 1 week.