Pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher's incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy. Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Cost-effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy for gallstone disease. A randomized trial. Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial. [Laparoscopic versus mini-cholecystectomy: analysis of hospital costs and social costs in a prospective randomized study]. Randomized trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and mini-cholecystectomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study. Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Immune function in patients undergoing open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Randomised, prospective, single-blind comparison of laparoscopic versus small-incision cholecystectomy. [Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-lap-cholecystectomy. Results of a prospective, randomized study]. Laparoscopic versus mini-incision cholecystectomy.
Comparative pulmonary function after cholecystectomy performed through Kocher's incision, a mini-incision, and laparoscopy was evaluated. Forty-five patients were randomly and prospectively divided into three groups of 15 each, depending on the surgical access employed. Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1), and forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% (FEF25-75%) were determined 1 to 3 days before and 16 to 24 hours after cholecystectomy. The percent reduction of FVC (p = 0.0170), FEV1 (p = 0.0191), and FEF25-75% (p = 0.0045) was smaller after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than after Kocher's incision cholecystectomy. The percent reduction of FVC (p = 0.0170) was smaller after mini-incision cholecystectomy than after Kocher's incision cholecystectomy. There was no difference in the FEV1 (p = 0.0971) or FEF25-75% (p = 0.2058) between these two groups. FEF25-75% was significantly less impaired in the laparoscopic group than in the mini-incision group (p = 0.0327). No difference between these two groups was found in FVC (p = 0.5755) or FEV1 (p = 0.3952). It is concluded that postoperative pulmonary function is less impaired after laparoscopic cholecystectomy than after either mini-incision or Kocher's incision cholecystectomy. Cytokines are the main mediators of inflammation and the response to trauma. The purpose of this study was to compare variations in cytokine levels following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy (OC), since these two types of operations were considered to be a unique model for examining the role of local tissue injury in postoperative inflammatory reactions.
                A total of 40 patients were studied. Eighteen of them underwent LC; the remaining 22 were operated on using the open technique. Systemic concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 (IL-1), tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before and after the operation. In addition, we compared pre- and postoperative white blood cell (WBC) counts, postoperative body temperature, and length of postoperative hospitalization.
                There was no difference between the two groups in IL-1 and TNF response. The rise in plasma IL-6 levels (18.86 +/- 9.61 vs 5.00 +/- 0.0 pg/ml, p < 0.0001) and CRP (8.40 +/- 5.81 vs 1.43 +/- 1.30 mg/dl, p < 0.001) were more marked after open cholecystectomy than after the laparoscopic procedure. There was no correlation between serum CRP concentrations and the other postoperative parameters.
                The magnitude of the acute-phase response was less pronounced following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, consistent with a reduction in tissue trauma. To evaluate the total cost of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and perform a cost-effectiveness (CE) analysis.
                One hundred adult subjects with painful gallstone disease were randomized: 59 cases for LC and 41 cases for MC. Patients with gallstones shown on ultrasound with normal common bile duct and no history of icterus were included after an informed consent. Cases with acute cholecystitis and raised alkaline phosphatase were excluded. LC was performed using CO2 insufflation and a Storz 2D video camera. MC was done by transverse rectus cutting incision. Outcome was coded as success or failure. Success was defined as operation without injury to bile duct, viscera or vessels, minimal pain and discomfort at 4 weeks, no wound infection up to 4 weeks, and resumption of work within 2 weeks of operation. The total cost of each case included cost of investigations, cost of disposable articles for operation, cost of drugs, cost of hospital stay, and cost of operation including anesthesia. LC and MC were done with reusable instruments. A "societal viewpoint" has been taken in the cost calculations.
                There were 50/59 successful outcomes in LC and 15/40 outcomes in MC group. Total cost for LC was 386,769 rupees (Rs) and for MC was Rs 205,041. CE in LC was Rs 7,735 and in MC was Rs 13,669. Incremental CE ratio comparing LC with MC was 3,028.33.
                LC is a more cost-effective method for treatment of gallstone disease. Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy has rapidly become routine practice in the UK, there has been no rigorous comparison of it with open cholecystectomy. In our trial, 302 patients were randomised to laparoscopic or minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. Recovery after surgery was assessed by length of hospital stay, outpatient review at 10 days and 4 weeks, and patient questionnaires 1, 4, and 12 weeks after surgery. The mean operation time was 14 min shorter for minilaparotomy, while median post-operative hospital stay was 2 days shorter after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The hospital costs were about 400 pounds greater for the laparoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic patients returned to work in the home sooner; at 1 week, they had better physical and social functioning, were less limited by physical problems, and had less pain and depression. At 4 weeks, only physical functioning and depression scores were better in the laparoscopic group, and by 3 months there were no differences. Laparoscopic patients were more satisfied with the appearance of their scars. The incidence of complications after both procedures was 20%. Compared to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy results in shorter hospital stay, less postoperative dysfunction, and quicker return to normal activities, but is more costly. The aim of the study was to calculate the hospital and social costs in relation to efficacy of clinical outcome, hospital stay and time off work in two groups of patients randomly treated with laparoscopic or mini-cholecystectomy. One hundred and eighty-one patients with simple, symptomatic gallstone disease were included in the study; of these, 9 cases were excluded because of conversion to conventional cholecystectomy. Eighty-six cases underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 86 mini-cholecystectomy. Operative time (median time: 35 minutes) and hospital stay (median stay: 3 days) were the same for both surgical procedures. The median time off work was 10 days for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 20 days for mini-cholecystectomy (P = 0.007). Hospital expenses showed a saving of 820.48 euros for each patient undergoing mini-cholecystectomy. Since laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with a shorter period off work, it seems to be cheaper with a daily saving of 164.96 and 146.51 Euros per patient, according to cost/effectiveness and cost/utility analyses, respectively. Consequently, although laparoscopic cholecystectomy shows a better outcome in terms of socioeconomic aspects and patient compliance, in an attempt to rationalize hospital expenditure, we would advocate mini-cholecystectomy for those patients who do not need to return to work early. Three hundred and ten patients having elective cholecystectomy were randomized to either laparoscopic cholecystectomy or mini-cholecystectomy. There were 155 patients in each group. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was significantly more common with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (13 versus 4 per cent) and complications were significantly more frequent with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (9 versus 3 per cent). If laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successful, hospital stay was significantly shorter than for mini-cholecystectomy (2 versus 3 days respectively), but overall the hospital stay was not significantly different. Postoperative analgesia requirements were reduced and return to normal activities and to work were faster after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There was no significant cost difference between the two procedures. To analyze outcomes after open small-incision surgery (minilaparotomy) and laparoscopic surgery for gallstone disease in general surgical practice.
                This study was a randomized, single-blind, multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to minilaparotomy cholecystectomy (MC). Both elective and acute patients were eligible for inclusion. All surgeons normally performing cholecystectomy, both trainees under supervision and consultants, operated on randomized patients. LC was a routine procedure at participating hospitals, whereas MC was introduced after a short training period. All nonrandomized cholecystectomies at participating units during the study period were also recorded to analyze the external validity of trial results. The randomization period was from March 1, 1997, to April 30, 1999.
                Of 1,705 cholecystectomies performed at participating units during the randomization period, 724 entered the trial and 362 patients were randomized to each of the procedures. The groups were well matched for age and sex, but there were fewer acute operations in the LC group than the MC group. In the LC group 264 and in the MC group 150 operations were performed by surgeons who had done more than 25 operations of that type. Median operating times were 100 and 85 minutes for LC and MC, respectively. Median hospital stay was 2 days in each group, but in a nonparametric test it was significantly shorter after LC. Median sick leave and time for return to normal recreational activities were shorter after LC than MC. Intraoperative complications were less frequent in the MC group, but there was no difference in the postoperative complication rate between the groups. There was one serious bile duct injury in each group, but no deaths.
                Operating time was longer and convalescence was smoother for LC compared with MC. Further analyses of LC versus MC are necessary regarding surgical training, surgical outcome, and health economy. Some benefits of laparoscopic (LC) and minilaparotomy (MC) cholecystectomy may reflect attenuation of the acute phase response. The authors examined components of this response.
                Patients were randomized to LC (n = 11) or MC (n = 11). C-reactive protein (CRP), alpha-1-antitrypsin (AAT), retinol-binding protein (RBP), transferrin, and albumin were measured preoperatively and on postoperative days 1, 2, 4, and 7. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-alpha) were measured more frequently perioperatively. Peak expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and forced vital capacity were measured daily.
                The IL-6 increase was more persistent and marked in the MC patients from hour 8 to day 7 postoperatively (P < 0.05). Alterations in CRP, AAT, and albumin were similar. Postoperative deficits of respiratory function correlated with the magnitude of acute phase protein alteration.
                Minimal access surgery induces an acute phase response that is less prominent after a laparoscopic technique. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has gained wide acceptance for treatment of cholelithiasis in preference to open cholecystectomy, though it has not been formally compared with mini cholecystectomy (MC). We have compared these two techniques in a randomised trial. 70 patients with ultrasound-proven cholelithiasis were randomly allocated LC (38) or MC (32); 37 and 25, respectively, underwent the assigned procedure. The mean hospital stay (including 1 preoperative day) was significantly shorter in the LC than the MC group (median 3 [interquartile range 2-3] vs 4 [3-5], p = 0.001) as was duration of convalescence (mean 11.9 [SD 9.1] vs 20.2 [16.5] days, p = 0.04). The rate of return to normal activities was 1.77 times greater in the LC group than in the MC group (95% confidence interval 1.01-3.11, p = 0.03). In regression analysis, the type of cholecystectomy done was the only variable significantly associated with the duration of convalescence. Although there was significant postoperative improvement in all of three quality of life scores in both groups, LC patients improved more quickly than did MC patients. This randomised trial shows the superior effectiveness of LC over MC in treating cholelithiasis. Abnormal release of inflammatory mediators following surgical injury is associated with immunological alteration, which may predispose to sepsis. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with reduced postoperative complications, but mechanisms are unclear. We hypothesized that early recovery following laparoscopic surgery may relate to minimal impairment of immune function.
                Analysis of the temporal immune responses in two similar groups of patients randomized to open (n = 22) vs laparoscopic (n = 22) cholecystectomy. Patients were matched for age, height, weight, and operation time. Immune parameters, including monocyte superoxide anion (O2-) and tumor necrosis factor release, neutrophil O2- levels and chemotaxis, total white blood cell counts, partial arterial oxygen pressure, and serum cortisol and C-reactive protein levels were assessed preoperatively and on postoperative days 1 and 3.
                There were significant increases (P < .001) in monocyte release of O2- and tumor necrosis factor, neutrophil release of O2- and chemotaxis, and white blood cell count in the open vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy study groups, with a concommitant decrease in partial arterial oxygen pressure. These findings correlated with significantly higher postoperative septic complications in the open cholecystectomy group (P < .05). There were no significant differences in either plasma cortisol or C-reactive protein levels between groups. All measurements were carried out in a blinded fashion.
                This study demonstrates that laparoscopic surgery appears to be associated with similar metabolic responses compared with open surgery, while immune parameters vary greatly between groups. The beneficial effects of laparoscopic surgery may relate, in part, to preservation of immune function in the postoperative period. We report a prospective randomised comparison between laparoscopic and small-incision cholecystectomy in 200 patients which was designed to eliminate bias for or against either technique.
                Patients were randomised in the operating theatre and anaesthetic technique and pain-control methods were standardised. Four experienced surgeons did both types of procedure. Identical wound dressings were applied in both groups so that carers could be kept blind to the type of operation.
                There was no significant difference between the groups for age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists grade. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy took significantly longer than small-incision cholecystectomy (median 65 [range 27-140] min vs 40 [18-142] min, p<0.001). The operating time included operative cholangiography which was attempted in all patients. We found no significant difference between the groups for hospital stay (postoperative nights in hospital, median 3-0 [1-17] nights for laparoscopic vs 3-0 [1-14] nights for small-incision, p=0.74), time back to work for employed persons (median 5-0 weeks vs 4.0 weeks; p=0.39), and time to full activity (median 3-0 weeks vs 3.0 weeks; p=0.15).
                Laparoscopic cholecystectomy takes longer to do than small-incision cholecystectomy and does not have any significant advantages in terms of hospital stay or postoperative recovery. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCCE) was gaining acceptance rapidly, when several institutions could demonstrate the safety of this minimal invasive treatment modality. Nevertheless prospective randomised studies still are missing to prove the advantages of this new treatment modality in contrast to open cholecystectomy. 77 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis were treated by LCCE (n = 40) or mini-lap CCE (n = 37) in a prospective, randomised study. As preliminary results, there were no differences in duration of anesthesia and operation time, perioperative complications or postoperative need for analgetics. Patients with LCCE had significant less postoperative pain, less restriction of total vital capacity and a shorter postoperative hospital stay as parameters of a diminished operative trauma. nan