Primary appendectomy. The effect of prophylatic cephaloridine on postoperative wound infection. Effect of prophylactic antibiotics in acute nonperforated appendicitis: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study. Prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis during childhood--a prospective randomised study. Intrarectal metronidazole in the prevention of anaerobic infections after emergency appendicectomy: a controlled clinical trial. [Infection after appendectomy. Effect of preventive metronidazole therapy]. A controlled study of single dosage cefamandole in the prophylaxis of wound infections in appendectomy. Antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection in emergency abdominal surgery. Should prophylactic antibiotics be given perioperatively in acute appendicitis without perforation? Prophylactic metronidazole in appendectomy: a double-blind controlled trial. The place of antibiotics in the prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis: a prospective study of 400 cases. A controlled trial of intraperitoneal noxytiolin in perforated appendicitis. Single-dose intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency abdominal surgery. A double-blind trial of a single intravenous dose of metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection following appendicectomy. Metronidazole in prevention and treatment of bacteroides infections after appendicectomy. Single dose intra-rectal metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection following emergency appendicectomy. Tinidazole in the prophylaxis of post-appendicectomy infections. Prophylactic lincomycin in the prevention of wound infection following appendicectomy: a double blind study. A double-blind controlled trial of metronidazole suppositories in children undergoing appendicectomy. Single-dose peroperative antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery. Single-dose parenteral antibiotic prophylaxis in gastrointestinal surgery. Prophylactic metronidazole in appendicectomy: a controlled trial. Nonperforative appendicitis: a continuing surgical dilemma. [Metronidazole prophylaxis in appendectomy]. Tinidazole prophylaxis in appendicectomies. A controlled study of single-dose versus 3-day therapy. Antibiotic prophylaxis in acute nonperforated appendicitis. The Danish Multicenter Study Group III. One-dose antibiotic prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy: a randomized trial of clindamycin, cefazolin sodium and a placebo. The prevention of postappendicectomy sepsis by metronidazole and cotrimoxazole: a controlled double blind trial. [Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with cefamandole before appendectomy. A prospective randomized double-blind study]. Perforated appendicitis and antibiotics. A survey and a controlled clinical trial. Metronidazole prophylaxis in acute mural appendicitis: failure of a single intra-operative infusion to reduce wound infection. Prevention of postoperative wound infection after appendectomy by local application of tinidazole: a double-blind study. Clinical and economic consequences of wound sepsis after appendicectomy and their modification by metronidazole or povidone iodine. Acute nonperforating appendicitis. Efficacy of brief antibiotic prophylaxis. Single-dose intrarectal metronidazole prophylaxis against wound infection after appendectomy. The value of a single intravenous dose of metronidazole as prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy. Metronidazole prophylaxis against wound infection in patients undergoing appendicectomy. The necessity of prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated appendicitis during childhood. The prevention of post-appendicectomy sepsis by metronidazole and cefazolin: a controlled double blind trial.
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study on the effect of cephaloridine prophylaxis in the surgical management of appendicitis was performed. Of the 139 patients studied, 70 received cephaloridine and 69 received placebo prophylaxis. Both groups of patients were well matched with regard to age, sex, operative findings, and bacteria isolated at operation. Postoperative wound infections were detected in 11.6% of placebo-treated patients and in 1.4% of cephaloridine-treated patients (P less than .02). Prophylactic treatment with cephaloridine of patients undergoing surgery for uncomplicated appendicitis resulted in a perceptible reduction in the rate of postoperative wound infection. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed to determined the efficacy of short-term (24 hr) perioperative antibiotics in preventing septic complications after emergency appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis. The patients were stratified into three clinical arms: Group I (placebo, n = 45), Group II (cefamandole, n = 46) and Group III (cefamandole plus carbenicillin, n = 45). The three groups of patients were similar in regard to age, sex, duration of operation and pathologic classification of the appendix. The overall incidence of infection in the study was 5.1%. The infection rates in Groups II (2.2%) and III (0%) were significantly lower than Group I (placebo) (13.3%), (p less than 0.05). No difference was observed between cefamandole alone and cefamandole plus carbenicillin. Average postoperative hospital days per patient for each group was: Group I - 3.8 days; Group II - 2.9 days; Group III - 3.1 days. Cost analysis of hospitalization including cost of prophylactic antibiotics revealed a $247.99 per patient saving for Group II versus Group I and $95.53 for Group III versus Group I. Systemic prophylactic antibiotics can successfully reduce septic complications after appendectomy for nonperforated appendicitis, and a single drug (cefamandole) directed at the facultative pathogens is as effective as double drug therapy, which includes specific anaerobic coverage. 544 children operated upon for uncomplicated appendicitis were randomised into three groups. Group I received no antibiotics, patients in Group II were administered one single pre-operative dose of metronidazole (10 mg/kg) and patients in Group III received both both metronidazole (20 mg/kg) and cefuroxime (50 mg/kg) in a single preoperative dose. The rate of infectious complications in Group I was 6.3% but only 2.1 and 2.3 in Groups II and III, respectively. Among patients with a normal appendix or patients with simple appendicitis there was no difference in the rate of post-operative infections between the three different groups. However, in patients with gangrenous appendicitis the rate of postoperative infections was significantly lower in the two groups who received preoperative antibiotics (1.8% and 3.0% respectively) than in the group receiving no prophylactic antibiotics (infection rate 14%). It is concluded that a single preoperative dose of metronidazole significantly decreases the rate of postoperative infectious complications in children with appendicitis. No further improvement could be demonstrated if cefuroxime against aerobic organisms was added. A series of 102 patients with presumptive acute appendicitis entered a prospective, randomized, clinical trial of intrarectal metronidazole given over a 48-h period commencing before surgery. Adequate levels of circulating metronidazole were achieved. A significant reduction in the incidence of anaerobic wound infection was observed in the treated group (P less than 0.02). The convenience and short duration of the prophylactic regimen allowed early discharge from hospital. No untoward effects were observed. nan A series of 102 consecutive patients undergoing appendectomy through an incision in the right iliac fossa entered a prospective randomized trial to compare the effects of a 2 gram intravenous bolus dose of cefamandole with a control study. No differences occurred in the incidence of wound infection in the two groups. We conclude that there is no place for a single preoperative dosage of cefamandole in the management of appendicitis. nan The authors question the need to give prophylactic antibiotics perioperatively in all cases of acute appendicitis without perforation to reduce the rate of wound infection. A retrospective study of 82 patients showed a wound infection rate of 4.8%; 3 of 53 patients who did not receive antibiotics had a wound infection compared with 1 of 29 patients who received antibiotics. A prospective double-blind clinical trial was performed comparing the results of perioperative administration of cefamandole and placebo. One of 21 patients who received the placebo had a wound infection; none of the 21 patients given cefamandole had infection. Thus, the authors conclude that, although reports in the literature suggest that antibiotics given perioperatively decrease the rate of wound infection in acute appendicitis without perforation, the incidence of such infection is too low to warrant routine administration. They suggest that such antibiotic use be reserved for those suspected of having more serious disease. Ninety-eight patients with suspected nonperforated acute appendicitis have to date been entered into a continuing, prospective, blinded randomized trial to determine the role of prophylactic metronidazole in postoperative wound infection. Twenty-six patients were excluded for the following reasons: diagnosis other than acute appendicitis (16), perforation of the appendix (8), administration of other antibiotics (1), and refusal to enter study (1). Seventy-two patients, 47 men and 25 women, with a mean age of 27.5 years (range 15 to 60 years), underwent appendectomy and were studied. Thirty patients received 1 gm intravenous metronidazole preoperatively and five intravenous doses of 500 mg metronidazole postoperatively. Forty-two patients received placebo only. Cultures of the appendiceal stump grew aerobic cultures in 45 (62%) and anaerobic organisms in 29 (40%): Escherichia coli and Bacteroides fragilis, respectively. Six of the 72 patients (8.2%) developed postoperative wound infections: four of 42 (9.5%) who received placebo and two of 30 (6.6%) who received metronidazole (P = 0.54 by Fisher exact test). No toxicity from metronidazole was observed. The postoperative wound infection rate is insufficient to demonstrate the efficacy of metronidazole for prophylaxis in nonperforated acute appendicitis, although there appears to be a tendency of to assume its efficacy in this regard. Post-appendicectomy sepsis still causes considerable morbidity and prolongs hospital stay. A large amount of recent work has gone into attempts to reduce such problems using various topical and systemic agents in differing regimes, with wide variation in their results. The aim of our study was to examine further the effectiveness of those different lines of prophylaxis against placebo in reducing post-appendicectomy sepsis. It is a comparative study of 400 cases of uncomplicated appendicitis operated upon by three senior Surgeons. The cases were allocated randomly in equal number to four groups according to the prophylactic antibiotic regime used: (a) Placebo; (b) Metronidazole alone; (c) Metronidazole and cefazolin; (d) Metronidazole and tobramycin. Antibiotics were given preoperatively with premedication and continued postoperatively for three days. The patients were checked for signs of sepsis during hospital stay and weekly up to a minimum of four weeks after discharge. They were also compared as far as their hospital stay is concerned. The conclusion of this study is that a combination of an antibiotic aimed at aerobes (cefazolin or tobramycin) with another aiming at anaerobes (metronidazole) is the best prophylactic regime against post-appendicectomy sepsis. A controlled trial of intraperitoneal noxytiolin (Noxiflex) solution in patients with peritonitis due to perforated appendicitis is reported. No significant difference was found in the incidence of complications between the treated and a control group, raising doubts as to whether this substance is of value when used intraperitoneally in peritonitis. In a randomized controlled trial of the use of a single intravenous dose of gentamicin sulfate and clindamycin phosphate used intraoperatively during emergency abdominal surgery, the overall incidence of postoperative wound infection was reduced from 32.3% to 10.4%. Significant reduction in wound infection occurred in the study group compared with control subjects irrespective of the underlying pathologic lesion. No side effects of the use of antibiotics were noted. The policy of antibiotic prophylaxis in emergency surgery seems to be of particular benefit in elderly patients. One hundred patients undergoing appendicectomy through a right iliac fossa incision were randomized to receive normal saline or 500 mg metronidazole as an intravenous infusion during the operation. One patient in the saline group developed an erythematous rash. There were 13 wound infections (as defined by the discharge of pus), 12 (out of 51) in the saline group and 1 (out of 49) in the metronidazole group. Bacteroides spp. were frequently cultured from the lumen of removed appendices and from pus obtained from infected wounds. This work supports the value of metronidazole but suggests that a single-dose regimen is adequate for prophylaxis. The frequency of non-clostridial anaerobic infection was studied in 95 patients who had undergone acute appendicectomy: 49 received prophylactic metronidazole and 46 received placebo. Anaerobic infection did not develop in any of the metronidazole-treated patients, but infections did develop in nine (19%) of the 46 controls. Metronidazole is conveniently administered by suppository to patients who cannot take oral drugs. Five patients with intra-abdominal infections caused by non-clostridial anaerobes were successfully treated with metronidazole. A prospective placebo controlled randomized trial was carried out in 104 patients with a presumptive diagnosis of acute appendicitis. A single dose of 1 g of metronidazole was given intra-rectally 1 h preoperatively. There were 16 wound infections, 15 (out of 50) in the placebo group, 1 (out of 54) in the metronidazole group. This study supports the already accepted value of metronidazole but suggests that a single intra-rectal dose regimen is adequate for prophylaxis. A total of 223 consecutive suspected appendicitis patients were treated preoperatively with parenteral tinidazole or physiological saline (control group). An infusion of 500 mg tinidazole was given to 110 patients over 30 minutes beginning about 30 minutes before the start of the operation, the control group comprised 111 patients. Postoperative infections were diagnosed in three patients in the group receiving tinidazole (3%) and in 17 patients in the control group (15%). The difference was statistically significant. There were no side-effects due to the drugs. Tinidazole appears to be well suited to the prophylaxis of post-appendicectomy infections. The prophylactic use of a single dose of lincomycin in 100 patients undergoing appendicectomy reduced the incidence of postoperative wound infection from 17 to 6 per cent compared with a similar group of control patients. There was no correlation with the histological finding in the appendix, but patients with perforated appendicitis were excluded from the study. Bacteriological examination of the appendix area before surgery showed that Bacteroides fragilis and Escherichia coli were the organisms most frequently isolated. The majority of wound infections were due to B. fragilis, either alone or in association with aerobic organisms, but infection due to E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus also occurred. Systemic antibiotic therapy can successfully reduce the complications following appendicectomy but it is necessary to use a compound with activity against anaerobic organisms. A total of 133 children, aged 16 months to 15 years (mean 6.7 years), with presumptive acute appendicitis, was included in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the short-term (72 hour) use of metronidazole suppositories as prophylaxis against post-operative infection. There was no significant difference in the incidence or severity of wound infection or post-operative intra-abdominal sepsis between the metronidazole-treated and placebo groups. It is suggested that intra-rectal metronidazole, when used exclusively, is not sufficient for effective prophylaxis for appendicitis in childhood. A single intravenous dose of tobramycin and lincomycin, given at the start of gastrointestinal operations, significantly reduced the incidence of postoperative wound infection from 34% to 5%. The occurrence of both anaerobic and aerobic bacteria was reduced. Therapeutic concentrations of the antibiotics were maintained throughout the operative period in most cases. No toxic effects of the antibiotics were detected, no anaesthetic complication occurred, and resistant strains of bacteria normally sensitive to the antibiotics were not isolated from wounds. In the course of two consecutive, double-blind and prospective studies, the authors evaluated the prophylactic effect of a single peroperative intravenous dose of gentamicin (this study included 166 patients) or the combination gentamicin and clindamycin (this study included 127 patients), on the wound infection rate following interventions involving the incision of an abdominal hollow viscus. Antibiotic prophylaxis lowered the post-operative wound sepsis rate, especially following clinically contaminated interventions, but this reduction did not reach statistical significance. It is concluded that a single peroperative parenteral dose of antibiotics does not constitute an entirely satisfactory means of wound infection prophylaxis in digestive surgery. Prophylactic metronidazole was compared with no treatment in a randomly allocated study of patients undergoing appendicectomy. A 1-g suppository of metronidazole was given with the premedication and 200 mg t.d.s. orally for 7 days thereafter. There were 4 hospital wound infections in the 87 patients receiving metronidazole and 11 out of 83 in the no-treatment group (P < 0.05). However, 60 per cent of wound infections occurred at home and the overall infection rates were not significantly different. The duration of postoperative hospital stay was longer in the control group (5.8 days +/- 3.0 s.d.) than in the treated group (4.8 +/- 2.3; P < 0.01). Only one anaerobic infection occurred in a patient receiving metronidazole but late infection was not prevented. Blood levels of metronidazole taken at the end of operation showed a wide variation but there was no correlation with subsequent infection. Culture of the appendix showed aerobic organisms in 88 per cent of cases and anaerobes in 72 per cent. It is suggested that an antibiotic which is effective against both aerobic and anaerobic organisms might have an advantage over metronidazole in appendicitis. Acute appendicitis continues as a medical challenge with newer approaches failing to improve diagnostic accuracy. The role of antibiotics in acute nonperforative appendicitis (NPA) remains unclear. In 175 patients studied at two hospitals, preoperative guidelines were used to exclude perforative appendicitis. Nevertheless, 14% of patients were found to have this condition. Surgeon's reports significantly underestimated the diagnosis when compared with the pathologists' reports. Antibiotic prophylaxis in 122 patients with NPA was studied prospectively comparing ceftizoxime (CTZ), cefamandole (CFM), and placebo (PLA). Ceftizoxime decreased the infection rate compared with PLA (0 vs. 8; P less than .01). Use of antibiotics (CTZ or CFM) resulted in decreased infections when compared with PLA (3 vs. 8; P less than .01) and fewer days of hospitalization (3.8 vs. 5.4 d, P less than .005). Analysis of infection risk factors showed no correlations except for failure to administer antibiotics and the finding of a gangrenous appendix. Operative culture results had no predictive value for either infection or pathogen identification. It is recommended that all patients undergoing surgery for NPA be given 1 d of antibiotic prophylaxis. nan The 588 consecutive patients who were operated on on suspicion of appendicitis were randomized into three groups: the control group (no prophylaxis); the single-dose group (preoperatively 500 mg of tinidazole intravenously); and the 3-day group (in addition to the former, a 3-day tinidazole treatment). To discover any postoperative infectious complications, the patients' follow-up study was extended for at least 1 month. Such complications emerged in 12% of the patients in the control group, in 7% of those in the single-dose group, and in 5% of those in the 3-day group. A statistically significant difference in the incidence of infectious complications was established between the control group and the prophylaxis groups. The 3-day tinidazole treatment, as compared with the single-dose prophylaxis, did not further improve the outcome. On the basis of these results the authors recommend that all patients subjected to an appendicectomy be given an intravenous tinidazole prophylaxis. In a prospective, block-randomized, multicenter study, the safety and efficacy of cefoxitin in preoperative prophylaxis were studied. 1735 patients undergoing appendectomy were evaluable, and half of these patients received 2 g of cefoxitin before undergoing operation. The patients were divided into three groups: patients with a normal appendix, patients with an acutely inflamed appendix, and patients with a gangrenous appendix. The study showed for each group a significant reduction of the incidence of wound infection in patients receiving prophylaxis. However, intra-abdominal abscess formation was not influenced by preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Consequently, routine preoperative prophylaxis is recommended before appendectomy. Two hundred and fifty patients were admitted to a prospective randomized trial of single dosage prophylaxis against wound infection after appendicectomy. There were 12 exclusions, 72 patients received placebo, 81 received 600 mg i.m. clindamycin phosphate and 85 received 1 1 g i.m. cefazolin sodium, the agent being given in the anaesthetic room. Clindamycin produced a significant reduction in the overall rate of wound infection from 33 per cent in the controls to 17 per cent. In cases with a gangrenous or perforated appendix the infection rate in controls was 78 per cent; this was reduced to 44 per cent by a single dose of clindamycin. Cefazolin significantly reduced the number of aerobic organisms isolated from wound infections, but did not significantly reduce the incidence of wound infection. We conclude that anaerobic organisms are more important than faecal aerobic organisms in the pathogenesis of wound infection after appendicectomy. A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was carried out in University Hospital, Kuala Lumpur to study the effect of metronidazole and cotrimoxazole on the incidence of wound infection following appendicectomy from November 1978 to January 1980. Patients were allocated at random into one of four groups: cotrimoxazole injection and placebo suppository, metronidazole suppository and cotrimoxazole injection, metronidazole suppository and placebo injection or placebo suppository and placebo injection. Treatment was started 30 min before operation and continued for 72h. All patients were followed up for 2 weeks and thereafter for one month. A total of 283 patients was finally accepted into the study. Sepsis rates were found to be 27% for the untreated group, 9% for the group receiving metronidazole only, 8% for the group receiving cotrimoxazole injection only and 2.7% for the group receiving both drugs. The study showed that a combination of metronidazole and cotrimoxazole is a regime highly effective for prophylaxis against wound infection following appendicectomy. In a prospective randomized double blind study, prophylactic cefamandol therapy was compared to placebos before appendectomy. 25 of 220 patients had to be excluded. The overall infection rate was reduced from 13,1% (1977/78) to 7,6% (1979/80). The infection rate differed in both groups (antibiotic and placebo) only for perforated appendices significantly. If there was a wound infection, the hospital stay of the treatment group was significantly reduced to the placebo group (p less than 0,0005). Predisposing factors for wound infection are leucocytosis greater than 12 000, anamnesis greater than 24 hours, operation time greater than 45 minutes. nan The efficacy of a single 500 mg intravenous intra-operative dose of metronidazole in the prevention of postoperative wound infection, following appendicectomy for acute mural appendicitis, was studied in a prospective randomized placebo controlled trial. Fourteen of the 96 patients (14.6%) in the metronidazole group and 13 of the 94 in the placebo group (13.8%) developed postoperative wound infection. Late sepsis was noted in 4 out of the 96 patients in the metronidazole group and in one of the 94 patients in the placebo group. This study suggests that a single intra-operative dose of metronidazole dose not reduce the incidence of postoperative wound infection following appendicectomy for acute mural appendicitis. nan The effects of intrarectal metronidazole and intraincisional povidone iodine on sepsis after emergency appendicectomy were compared in a double-blind randomised controlled trial in 496 patients. Wound sepsis occurred in 12.3% of metronidazole-treated patients compared with 24% in the povidone-iodine group and 23.5% in an untreated control group. The metronidazole-treated patients left hospital approximately 2 days earlier than patients in the other two groups. They returned to work sooner and receiver fewer visits from the district nursing service. A short six-dose course of metronidazole significantly reduces the wound-infection rate in patients over the age of 12 undergoing emergency appendicectomy. If the clinical and economic benefits of metronidazole shown by this study are confirmed, the drug should be considered for routine use in emergency appendicectomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was performed to determine the efficacy of perioperative systemic antibiotics in preventing infection after appendectomy for acute nonperforating appendicitis. One hundred three patients received three doses of either placebo (saline, n = 52) or cefoxitin sodium (n = 51). The two groups were similar with regard to age distribution, sex ratio, duration of operation, pathologic condition of appendix, and hospital stay. Postoperative wound infections were detected in 9.6% of the placebo-treated patients, whereas none occurred in the cefoxitin group. All but one infection appeared after discharge. Cost analysis identified a net savings of $ 84 per patient with the use of prophylactic antibiotics. Septic morbidity after appendectomy for nonperforating appendicitis is significantly reduced by systemic antibiotics, and brief administration of a single broad-spectrum agent (cefoxitin) is effective prophylaxis. nan 131 patients from 158 appendicectomies were randomly divided before the operation into two groups: a single intravenous dose of metronidazole, and a physiological saline placebo group. The overall infection rate was 8.4%. In the non-perforated cases the infection rates were 3.4% in the metronidazole and 7.9% in the placebo group. In cases with perforated appendix the infection rate was 40%. There was no statistically significant difference in the infection rates between the groups. Our results give no clear indication of the benefit of metronidazole prophylaxis and we propose, therefore, to concentrate on the technical aspects of appendicectomy in infection prophylaxis. The effect of a preoperative single intravenous dose of metronidazole was studied in a prospective trial of 203 patients. 17.5% of the patients in the control group developed a wound infection compared with 3.4% of those receiving metronidazole (p less than 0.001). The average length of hospitalization and convalescence was significantly reduced in the metronidazole group. The use of metronidazole in prevention of wound infection is recommended. A prospective, randomized, clinical study was done to evaluate the place of prophylactic antibiotics in uncomplicated childhood appendicitis. One hundred patients with uncomplicated appendicitis were randomly assigned to one of four groups, each consisting of 25 cases. Group 1 patients did not receive prophylactic antibiotic. Group 2, group 3, and group 4 patients received ornidazole, penicillin plus tobramycin, and piperacillin, respectively. The use of prophylactic antibiotics did not yield better results than the use of placebos. The rarity of infectious complications after uncomplicated appendicectomy may be unique for children. Although the need for antibiotic prophylaxis is well documented in adults, the rarity of infectious complications makes it highly questionable in the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis in children. A double blind, randomized, controlled trial was carried out at two hospitals to try the effect of metronidazole, which is effective against most anaerobes, and cefazolin, which is effective against many aerobic organisms, singly and in combination, on the incidence of wound sepsis following appendicectomy. Patients were placed at random into one of four groups; to receive metronidazole and placebo, cefazolin and placebo, metronidazole and cefazolin, or double placebo. Patients with generalized peritonitis were excluded for ethical reasons. Treatment was started before operation and continued eight-hourly for twenty-four hours. All patients in the trial were followed up at about two weeks after discharge from hospital and their wounds inspected. Two hundred and seventy-one patients were assessed. Sepsis rates at the two hospitals were similar. On the untreated controls, 30% discharged pus from their wounds, and in the groups receiving one drug only, about 20%. In those receiving both drugs the infection rate was 3%, a highly significant difference from that in the other three groups.