[Study of the clinical effects of sulpiride and perphenazine in 82 schizophrenic patients by the double blind method]. Controlled trial of sulpiride in chronic schizophrenic patients. Sulpiride and perphenazine in schizophrenia. A double-blind clinical trial. Prophylactic effects of neuroleptics in symptom-free schizophrenics: a comparative dose-response study of timiperone and sulpiride. Sulpiride versus haloperidol in schizophrenia: a double-blind comparative trial. [Clinical trial with Sulpiride and placebo in chronic schizophrenics (study of 89 patients using the Harris-Letemendía-Willems scale)]. A double-blind comparison of sulpiride with chlorpromazine in chronic schizophrenia. A single-blind comparison of bromperidol and sulpiride in hospitalized schizophrenics. Comparison of sulpiride and chlorpromazine in psychoses. A double-blind multicentre study. Sulpiride augmentation in people with schizophrenia partially responsive to clozapine. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. A single-blind study of clocapramine and sulpiride in hospitalized chronic schizophrenic patients.
Our clinical and statistical evaluation of Sulpiride and Perphenazine was carried out over a 10 week period, in 82 patients of both sexes, aged 20 to 56 years. All were chronic patients with a symptomatic profile of apathy, lack of initiative but with the personality relatively well preserved in 56 patients. The daily dosage varied from 300 to 1,200 mg Sulpiride orally and 12 to 48 mg Perphenazine. The effects of therapy have been received globally and individually at the beginning, 4th, 8th, and the end of the 10th week using the B.P.R.S. modified by the clinic of Neurology and Psychiatry of the University of Hiroshima. Using "Armitage's Restricted Sequential Design", there was no significant difference between the therapeutic effects of these 2 neuroleptics. However, Sulpiride appeared more beneficial following the review during the 8th week and the 4th week. In a double-blind comparative trial of sulpiride (600-1,800 mg/day) and trifluoperazine (15-45 mg/day) in 38 chronic schizophrenic patients, ratings of therapeutic results and unwanted effects were made at two-weekly interviews during the six weeks treatment period. The results show that sulpiride has neuroleptic properties and a spectrum of therapeutic activity similar to that of trifluoperazine. There was an association between plasma sulpiride levels and therapeutic response after four weeks' treatment. Seventeen patients with acute schizophrenia and 30 with chronic schizophrenia were included in a randomized, double-blind parallel-group trial comparing sulpiride and perphenazine. Patients were evaluated using the 16-item Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) prior to the onset of treatment and 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 2, 3, and 4 months thereafter. In patients with acute schizophrenia, total BPRS scores declined significantly at the end of the trial compared with pretreatment values in sulpiride-treated patients but not in schizophrenics treated with perphenazine. Differences in response between the groups did not reach statistical significance, however. For patients suffering from chronic schizophrenia, a statistically significant decline was observed in total BPRS scores at 4 months compared with pretreatment scores in both sulpiride and perphenazine groups. There was no significant difference in the treatment response between the groups. Sulpiride appeared to be somewhat more effective than perphenazine for treatment of acute schizophrenia. Efficacy of both compounds was less marked in chronic forms of schizophrenia. Remitted schizophrenic outpatients were prophylactically treated to prevent relapse with three different doses of timiperone or sulpiride for a year in a double-blind controlled study employing a randomized design. Each drug's ability to prevent relapse was by counting the number of subjects with different outcomes (remission, relapse, adverse reactions) during the trial and/or the number of symptom-free days for each patient before any sign of relapse or adverse reactions appeared. Patients were randomly assigned to the following drugs, which were orally administered once every night: placebo; timiperone 1 mg, 3 mg, 6 mg; sulpiride 100 mg, 300 mg, 600 mg. Data from previous studies involving haloperidol and propericiazine were utilized as a retrospective placebo group to compare the characteristics of the four drugs for maintenance treatment of remitted schizophrenic outpatients. Both timiperone and sulpiride increased the number of patients in remission and decreased the number of patients who relapsed, compared with the placebo group. With timiperone, there was an especially marked increase in the number of patients who showed signs of adverse reactions compared with sulpiride. Sulpiride was the only drug that increased the number of dose-dependent symptom-free days. However, both of these drugs significantly increased the number of symptom-free days compared with placebo. By comparing the dose-response curves of four drugs tested in the same fashion, haloperidol and sulpiride were superior to propericiazine and timiperone because they displayed a wider dose range for the maintenance treatment of remitted schizophrenic outpatients. nan nan nan Fourty-five schizophrenic inpatients were randomly assigned to bromperidol or sulpiride in an 8 week single-blind clinical trial. No statistically significant differences were observed for final global improvement rating. Regarding BPRS items and compared to sulpiride, bromperidol was particularly effective to relieve emotional withdrawal and hallucinatory behavior, although the only significant between group difference was in favour of sulpiride for improvements of somatic concern. No significant differences were observed for all PES items, although sulpiride was found more effective for hypochondriasis and neurotic complaint as was bromperidol for hallucination and disturbance of self-conscious. The rate of side-effects and abnormal laboratory test results were comparable in the two groups. They were not severe enough to require termination of administration. Bromperidol and sulpiride are concluded to have different clinical profile in the treatment of schizophrenic hospitalized patients. In a material of 71 patients admitted because of acute or chronic psychoses, 32 were treated with sulpiride (up to 1,800 mg per day) and 39 with chlorpromazine (up to 675 mg). Duration of treatment was from 4 to 8 weeks. The effect of the two preparations was very similar as were the type and frequency of side effects, except that sulpiride did not cause sunrash. We hypothesised that a combined regimen of clozapine, a relatively weak D2-dopaminergic antagonist, and sulpiride, a selective D2 blocker, would demonstrate a greater antipsychotic efficacy by enhancing the D2 blockade of clozapine.
                Twenty-eight people with schizophrenia, previously unresponsive to typical antipsychotics and only partially responsive to current treatment with clozapine, received, double-blind, 600 mg/day sulpiride or placebo, in addition to an ongoing clozapine treatment. The clinical status was evaluated before, during, and at the end of 10 weeks of sulpiride addition using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression.
                The clozapine-sulpiride group exhibited substantially greater and significant improvements in positive and negative psychotic symptoms. About half of them, characterised by a younger age and lower baseline SAPS scores, had a mean reduction of 42.4 and 50.4% in their BPRS and SAPS scores, respectively.
                A subgroup of patients with chronic schizophrenia may substantially benefit from sulpiride addition to clozapine. The therapeutic effects, safety and side-effects of clocapramine and sulpiride were evaluated in 52 hospitalized chronic schizophrenic patients using a single-blind method during an 8-week trial period. While the final global improvement rating showed clocapramine to be superior to sulpiride, the differences were not statistically significant. The time course of the total psychiatric rating scales (PRS) showed a progressive decline during treatment for both drugs, and at the end of treatment clocapramine proved significantly lower in total PRS than did sulpiride. In the improvement of psychotic symptoms, clocapramine seemed to be superior to sulpiride with respect to motor retardation, delusion, hallucination or disturbance of self-consciousness, social isolation or withdrawal, and recreation or work. Side-effects appeared more frequently with clocapramine than with sulpiride, but abnormal laboratory-test results appeared less in clocapramine-treated patients than in sulpiride-treated ones. Neither side-effects nor abnormal laboratory-test results induced by the two drugs were severe enough to terminate administration. Clocapramine is concluded to have a more favourable effect on negative symptoms, as well as on some positive symptoms of chronic schizophrenia, than sulpiride.