Prevention of delayed graft function by diltiazem and iloprost. Calcium channel blockade and preservation of renal graft function in cyclosporine-treated recipients: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled 2-year study. Influence of diltiazem on renal function and rejection in renal allograft recipients receiving triple-drug immunosuppression: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Preoperative graft reperfusion with a calcium antagonist improves initial function: preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial in 110 kidney recipients. Protective effects of calcium antagonists in human renal transplantation. Effect of diltiazem in the prevention of acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection, and cyclosporine levels. Calcium channel blockers and early cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after renal transplantation: a prospective randomized study. Improved immediate graft function with nifedipine in cyclosporine-treated renal allograft recipients--a randomized prospective study. Kidney protective effect of diltiazem after renal transplantation with long cold ischemia time and triple-drug immunosuppression. Gallopamil reduces the post-transplantation acute tubular necrosis in kidneys from aged donors. Verapamil improves the outcome after cadaver renal transplantation.
nan Studies have provided conflicting results as to the protective role of calcium channel blockers (CCB) in cyclosporine-treated patients with regard to blood pressure control and preservation of renal graft function. Lacidipine is a dihydropyridine CCB that possesses antioxidative, anti-atherosclerotic, and anti-adhesion properties and was shown to prevent cyclosporine-induced nephrotoxicity in a rat model.
                We conducted a multicenter prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 131 de novo recipients of a cadaveric renal allograft on cyclosporine therapy. The aim of this 2-year study was to assess the effects of lacidipine on graft function (plasma iohexol clearance), renal plasma flow, anastomotic arterial blood flow, deterioration of renal function, blood pressure, acute rejection, and hospitalization rate.
                A total of 118 recipients were available for intention-to-treat analysis on efficacy (lacidipine: n=59; placebo: n=59). Graft function assessed by serum creatinine concentration and glomerular filtration rate measured as plasma iohexol clearance, was persistently better in lacidipine-treated patients from 1 year onwards (respectively, P<0.01 and P<0.05). Renal plasma flow and anastomotic blood flow were not significantly higher in lacidipine-treated patients. Three patients on lacidipine therapy and four on placebo experienced treatment failure defined as an increase in serum creatinine from baseline of more than 60% (log-rank test: P=0.57). Study groups did not differ in acute rejection rate, trough blood cyclosporine concentrations, blood pressure, number of antihypertensive drugs, hospitalization rate, and adverse event rate.
                The use of calcium channel blockers in cyclosporine-treated renal recipients results in a significantly better allograft function at 2 years and this effect is independent of blood pressure lowering. In a prospective, randomized and placebo-controlled study we evaluated the influence of treatment with the calcium-channel blocker diltiazem on the course and results of cadaveric kidney transplantation in 39 graft recipients. The grafts were reperfused with Euro-Collins solution containing diltiazem 20 mg/l. All recipients except those in chronic treatment with a calcium-channel blocker received preoperatively a bolus of diltiazem or placebo 0.3 mg/kg and in all an infusion of diltiazem or placebo 3 mg/kg/24 h was started preoperatively. After that, diltiazem or placebo was given orally for 3 months. Donors were not treated. Immunosuppressive therapy consisted of prednisone, azathioprine and CsA. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning donor or recipient characteristics, HLA-mismatching, and ischaemic time. Thrombosis leading to graft loss occurred in 3 recipients (diltiazem:2, placebo:1) and one graft was lost due to septicaemia (diltiazem). For the remaining 35 grafts no beneficial effect of treatment with diltiazem was found for the rate of delayed graft function, the rate of rejections, time to first rejection, whole blood CsA concentration, or graft function. The CsA dose needed to reach target whole blood concentration was significantly less in the diltiazem group. In conclusion, our results do not indicate any beneficial effects of treatment with diltiazem in cadaveric kidney transplantation, except a reduction of costs because of a significant reduction of the CsA dosage. nan To test the hypothesis that calcium antagonists decrease the incidence and severity of delayed graft function, we conducted three separate, prospective, randomized trials. In these trials, we investigated the effects of diltiazem and those of the prostacyclin analogue iloprost. In the first study, 22 control patients and 20 diltiazem patients received grafts perfused with either vehicle or diltiazem 20 mg/liter in the Euro-Collins solution. Subsequently, the diltiazem subjects were given the drug as a bolus of 0.28 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.002 mg/min/kg for the following two days. Thereafter, diltiazem 60 mg was given to the treated subjects orally for up to four years. In the second study, 11 control subjects and 10 diltiazem subjects received the same postoperative regimen, but all grafts were harvested without addition of diltiazem to the perfusion solution. In the third protocol, four groups were studied as follows: 19 control subjects who received no specific treatment, 16 subjects who received diltiazem, 16 subjects who were given iloprost, and 14 subjects who received both iloprost and diltiazem. The donor kidney of treated patients was perfused with either diltiazem, iloprost, or both drugs. Primary graft function occurred more commonly in the groups receiving diltiazem. Further, in the first study the number of hemodialyses per patient was reduced in those patients with delayed graft function. Fewer rejection episodes occurred in patients receiving diltiazem. Plasma levels of soluble interleukin-2 receptors decreased significantly during diltiazem treatment. Moreover, renal biopsies showed less severe signs of Cyclosporin A (CsA) nephrotoxicity in diltiazem-treated patients compared to controls, even though these patients also exhibited higher CsA trough levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) nan nan nan nan Due to a shortage of suitable kidneys for transplantation there has been an increase in the use of kidneys taken from old and marginal donors, which has led to a high incidence of acute tubular necrosis. Several reports suggest that the administration of calcium channel blockers improves the initial function after renal transplantation. We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial to study the effect of the calcium channel blocker gallopamil on the incidence and course of acute tubular necrosis following cadaveric renal transplantation. A trend developed showing a decrease in episodes of acute tubular necrosis in gallopamil versus placebo, and became statistically significant when the outcome of kidneys from donors older than 50 years was analyzed separately [gallopamil 6/14 (42%) vs. placebo 10/11 (91%), P <0.01 corrected chi2]. We conclude that pre-transplantation renal graft perfusion and post-transplantation recipient treatment with gallopamil reduces the incidence of post-transplantation acute tubular necrosis, particularly in kidney taken from older donors. Because of their favorable effects on renal hemodynamics, calcium antagonists may have a major role in the prevention and management of certain types of acute renal dysfunction. In fact, verapamil (VP) was shown to prevent cyclosporin A (CsA)-induced decreases in RBF in mice and in cadaver renal transplant (CRT) recipients. The study presented here of 59 cadaver renal transplant patients evaluates the outcome from perioperative treatment with VP (N = 30) administered intraoperatively into the renal artery (10 mg) followed by oral administration of 120 mg every 8 to 12 h for 14 days versus no drug (N = 29). Early immunosuppression included azathioprine, corticosteroids, and antilymphocyte globulin with subsequent overlapping with CsA on days 5 and 6. Actuarial graft survival at 1 yr was different when the two groups were compared (P less than 0.05). Estimated graft survival at 1 yr for VP patients was 93.3 compared with 72.4% in control patients. The improved graft survival was most striking in repeat transplants with 90% graft survival at 1 yr for VP recipients versus 37.5% for controls. Compared with controls, VP recipients had significantly improved renal parenchymal diastolic blood flow velocities on the first day after surgery (7.8 versus 5.8 cm/s). By day 7, GFR were greater with VP (44 +/- 29 mL/min) versus controls (28 +/- 22 mL/min). Of VP patients, 67% (18 of 24) had GFR greater than 30 mL/min versus 33% (9 of 26) for control patients. Similarly, on the seventh day, 77% (21 of 30) of VP patients had serum creatinines less than 2.0 mg% versus 34% (10 of 29) for controls.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)