Viral prophylaxis in combined pancreas-kidney transplant recipients. The impact of CytoGam on cardiac transplant recipients with moderate hypogammaglobulinemia: a randomized single-center study. The effect of polyimmune gammaglobulin for prophylaxis against reactivation cytomegalovirus infection in kidney and kidney/pancreas transplant recipients. Use of ganciclovir plus cytomegalovirus immune globulin to treat CMV pneumonia in orthotopic liver transplant recipients. The Boston Center for Liver Transplantation CMVIG-Study Group. Intravenous immunoglobulin infusions for the prophylaxis of secondary cytomegalovirus infection. A randomized double-blind study of the effect of prophylactic immune globulin on the incidence and severity of CMV infection in the liver transplant recipient. [Is CMV-hyperimmune serum prophylaxis after kidney transplantation always meaningful?]. Randomized comparison of ganciclovir plus intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) with IVIG alone for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus disease in children receiving liver transplants. Adverse effect of low-dose prophylactic human recombinant leukocyte interferon-alpha treatment in renal transplant recipients. Cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis leading to an increased incidence of irreversible rejections. Controlled clinical trial of prophylactic human-leukocyte interferon in renal transplantation. Effects on cytomegalovirus and herpes simplex virus infections. Impact of prophylaxis with cytogam alone on the incidence of CMV viremia in CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipients. Multicenter trial of Towne strain attenuated virus vaccine in seronegative renal transplant recipients. Prospective randomized trial of efficacy of ganciclovir versus that of anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin to prevent CMV disease in CMV-seropositive heart transplant recipients treated with OKT3. Cytomegalovirus vaccine in renal transplant candidates: progress report of a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. CMV hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis after liver transplantation: a prospective randomized controlled study. Prophylaxis of primary cytomegalovirus disease in renal transplant recipients. A trial of ganciclovir vs immunoglobulin. [Cytomegalovirus hyperimmunoglobulin prophylaxis following kidney transplantation. Results of a prospective randomized study]. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of human lymphoblastoid interferon prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients. Prevention of cytomegalovirus-related death by passive immunization. A double-blind placebo-controlled study in kidney transplant recipients treated for rejection. A prospective randomized study of acyclovir versus ganciclovir plus human immune globulin prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection after solid organ transplantation. Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus disease with ganciclovir or anti-CMV immunoglobulin in renal transplant recipients who receive antilymphocytic antibodies as induction therapy. Cytomegalovirus infection in heart transplant recipients: preliminary results of a controlled trial of intravenous gamma globulin. Use of cytomegalovirus immune globulin to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in renal-transplant recipients. Effects of interferon-alpha on cytomegalovirus reactivation syndromes in renal-transplant recipients. Towne-vaccine-induced prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplants. Early detection of primary cytomegalovirus infection after heart and kidney transplantation and the influence of hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis. CMV prophylaxis in high-risk renal transplant patients (D+/R-) by acyclovir with or without hyperimmune (CMV) immunoglobulins: a prospective study. Failure of high-dose oral acyclovir with or without immune globulin to prevent primary cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of solid organ transplants. Polyvalent immune globulin and cytomegalovirus infection after renal transplantation. Hyperimmune globulin prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation.
The purpose of this study was to analyze different regimens of viral prophylaxis after combined pancreas-kidney transplantation (PKT). Over a 4-year period, we performed 82 PKTs with quadruple immunosuppression with OKT3 induction. Four regimens of prophylaxis were studied. The first 30 patients received standard intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG; 0.5 g/kg) for 6 doses and oral acyclovir for 3 months. The next 34 recipients received intravenous ganciclovir (2.5 mg/kg) twice daily for 2 weeks followed by oral acyclovir for 3 months. In the third group, patients were randomized to 5 doses over 2 months of either standard IVIG (n = 9) or CMV hyperimmune globulin (Cytogam; n = 9; 100-150 mg/kg) plus 2 weeks of i.v. ganciclovir followed by 3 months of oral acyclovir. The 4 groups were similar with respect to clinical, demographic, and immunologic variables, including donor and recipient CMV serologic status and blood transfusions. All patients were monitored for viral infections in the first 6 months after PKT. The regimens of prophylaxis resulted in (1) no major non-CMV (including no EBV) viral infections; (2) 3 cases of minor non-CMV viral infections (shingles); and (3) no differences in the incidence, timing, or severity of symptomatic CMV infections in the 4 groups. No death or graft loss was due to viral infection. Prophylaxis is effective in reducing the incidence of non-CMV viral infections and may reduce the severity of symptomatic CMV infection. However, we could not show any added benefit of either Cytogam or standard IVIG when used in combination with other antiviral agents. For economic as well as efficacy reasons, we recommended that IVIG preparations not be used routinely with antilymphocyte therapy but only in high-risk situations such as primary CMV exposure. We have previously shown that the preemptive use of cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin (Ig) replacement (CytoGam) decreases the incidence of opportunistic infections in cardiac transplant recipients with severe hypogammaglobulinemia. However, the impact of Ig replacement in moderately hypogammaglobulinemic patients is unknown.
                Periodic monitoring of the IgG levels was done in 300 heart transplant recipients. Moderate hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG, 350-500 mg/dl) developed in 56 patients (18.6%). Thirty-three patients declined randomization but agreed to have their IgG levels monitored. Twenty-three patients were randomized to placebo (n = 10) or CytoGam (n = 13) at 105 +/- 63 days after transplantation.
                The baseline characteristics were similar. A significant reduction in CMV infection was noted in the CytoGam Group compared with the Placebo Group (15.4% [2/13] vs 60% [6/10], p = .039). Among patients who declined randomization, CMV infection developed in 13 (39.4%) of 33, and 6 (46.1%) of the 13 progressed to severe hypogammaglobulinemia. A trend for reduction in the average episodes of > or =grade 2 rejection during the 6-month period after randomization was noted in the CytoGam group (0.4 +/- 0.6 vs 1.4 +/- 1.3, p = 0.065).
                The preemptive use of CytoGam decreases the incidence of CMV infection in patients with moderate hypogammaglobulinemia. A larger randomized study is needed to substantiate these results. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the most important infection in the renal transplant recipient. Few data are available that provide guidance for approaches that seek to reduce the reactivation of latent disease after transplantation. To test the efficacy of polyimmune gammaglobulin in kidney and kidney/pancreas transplantation, consenting recipients with serologic evidence of previous CMV disease were randomized to receive i.v. polyimmune gammaglobulin (500 mg/kg) within 3 days of transplant with 250 mg/kg at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6 or no prophylaxis. Both groups received identical induction and rejection immunosuppressive therapy. Polyimmune gammaglobulin prophylaxis reduced CMV reactivation infections. The incidence of reactivation infections was half in patients receiving Nashville/rabbit antithymocyte serum (N/R-ATS) compared with those receiving monoclonal anti-CD-3 therapy. Patients receiving polyimmune gammaglobulin along with N/R-ATS had an incidence of infection of only 10%. Reactivation infections were twice as common in patients who had primary nonfunction and nearly three times as common in patients with acute rejection. Both risk factors were associated with longer anti-T-cell therapy. Polyimmune gammaglobulin prophylaxis should be considered in transplant patients with previous CMV exposure who will be receiving prolonged anti-T-cell therapy because of acute rejection or primary nonfunction. nan Previous studies have shown a benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin infusions for the prophylaxis of primary CMV infections in renal transplant recipients. This study was undertaken in order to see if high-risk renal transplant patients at risk for secondary CMV infection would benefit from prophylactic intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. A randomized prospective study of renal transplant recipients who were considered at high risk for secondary CMV infection was performed. Thirty-four patients were studied, 16 receiving the intravenous immunoglobulin infusions and 18 being untreated controls. Unselected lots of Sandoglobulin (Sandoz) were used for the treatment group (500 mg/kg x 3 doses, followed by 250 mg/kg x 2 doses at 2-week intervals). The number of days febrile and days hospitalized secondary to CMV illness, and the number of complications secondary to CMV illness, were significantly reduced in the patients who were prophylactically treated with intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. None of the patients died from CMV infection in either group. There were no significant complications related to the intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. This study suggests that prophylactic immunoglobulin infusions will reduce the severity of CMV infection in the patient who is at risk for secondary or reactivation infection as well as the patient at risk for primary infection. This therapy should be considered for renal transplant recipients who are at high risk for developing CMV infection, both primary and secondary. nan CMV-infections are a common and dreadful complication in immunosuppressed patients after kidney transplantation. This randomized, controlled clinical study investigates the influence of CMV-hyperimmune serum (HIS)-prophylaxis on infection incidence and severity of illness with regard to the type of immunosuppression employed. Though the clinical manifestation of the disease is lowered by HIS in cyclosporin-treated patients, there is a higher infection incidence with increased severity in HIS-treated ATG/Imurek patients compared to the respective control. A randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted to determine the benefit of ganciclovir (5 mg/[kg x d]) for 30 days in addition to intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for 16 weeks for prevention of primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in children receiving liver transplants. Patients were monitored for 6 months after transplantation. The two groups of patients (recipients of 29 ganciclovir plus IVIG and 27 recipients of IVIG alone) were similar in terms of age, sex, and underlying disease. The incidence of CMV disease among the ganciclovir plus IVIG recipients and the IVIG alone recipients was 17% and 26%, respectively, and the time to disease in these recipients was 46 days and 32 days, respectively. There was no difference between groups in terms of survival; episodes of rejection, bacteremia, or fungemia; use of immunosuppressive agents; and incidence of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. These results suggest that a 4-week course of ganciclovir with IVIG is not more effective than IVIG alone for prevention of primary CMV disease. Since short-term prophylaxis with ganciclovir may delay the onset of CMV disease, further studies with a longer course of ganciclovir prophylaxis are warranted. Since infections with Herpetoviridae after kidney transplantation still remain a major clinical problem, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using low-dose recombinant interferon-alpha-2C (rIFNa2C) prophylaxis in 50 renal graft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. Ten patients were excluded from further analysis because of graft loss due to surgical complications, side effects of rIFNa2C, and because of lack of compliance. There was a significant difference in graft loss due to irreversible rejections between the verum and the placebo group (6 vs. 0; P less than 0.05), whereas no difference was observed with regard to the occurrence of viral infections. We conclude, that low-dose rIFNa2C prophylaxis is harmful in renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine in view of the high incidence of irreversible transplant rejections without beneficial effects on the occurrence of viral infections. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of interferon prophylaxis against viral infections was conducted in renal-transplant recipients receiving standard immunosuprressive therapy with or without antithymocyte globulin. Interferon was administered for six weeks, beginning on the day of transplantation. Cytomegalovirus excretion began earlier and viremia was more frequent in placebo-treated than in interferon-treated patients. Cytomegalovirus viremia correlated with clinical syndromes was more frequent in recipients of antithymocyte globulin. In contrast, neither interferon nor antithymocyte globulin altered excretion of herpes simplex virus. Reversible leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in seven interferon recipients. Patient and graft survival were comparable in interferon and placebo groups. There preliminary results suggest that a six-week course of prophylactic interferon delays shedding of cytomegalovirus and decreases the incidence of viremia after transplantation. In contrast, antithymocyte globulin appears to increase the severity of infection from cytomegalovirus among these patients. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a serious problem after lung transplantation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of CytoGam, a CMV hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IGIV), as CMV prophylaxis after lung transplantation.
                This prospective, randomized, open-label study compared prophylaxis with CMV-IGIV and no prophylaxis in 44 CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipients. The primary end-point was development of CMV viremia during the first year after transplantation.
                Cytomegalovirus viremia was detected in 13 of 22 recipients without prophylaxis and in 16 of 22 recipients with CMV-IGIV prophylaxis (p = 0.19). Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis developed in 8 controls vs in 11 CMV-IGIV recipients (p = 0.54). We found no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of positive shell vial assays (6.8% +/- 6.5% without vs 11.2% +/- 10.1% with prophylaxis, p = 0.09) or in the attack rate of CMV pneumonitis (0.41 +/- 0.59 episodes/patient without vs 0.86 +/- 0.99 episodes/patient with prophylaxis, p = 0.07). Similarly, no difference was apparent in the time to onset of CMV viremia, to detection of CMV DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes by polymerase chain reaction, or to development of CMV pneumonitis. The incidence of acute rejection and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and the survival rate during the first post-transplant year did not differ between the groups.
                Prophylaxis with CMV-IGIV alone did not decrease CMV viremia or pneumonitis, did not decrease the incidence of acute rejection or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, and did not affect 1-year survival of CMV-seropositive lung transplant recipients at our center. The Towne strain of attenuated CMV vaccine was compared with placebo in seronegative renal transplants who later received kidneys from seropositive donors. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 3 different institutions. The results were consistent with 2 prior studies, in that whereas mild CMV disease was only slightly and insignificantly reduced in vaccine recipients, severe disease was markedly reduced. In the current study, all 4 severe cases of CMV disease occurred in placebo recipients, for an incidence of 17%, versus 0% in vaccine recipients (P < 0.03). Thus, prior immunization rendered seronegative patients more resistant to the effects of CMV infection. We compared the efficacy of ganciclovir versus that of cytomegalovirus (CMV) immunoglobulin for the prevention of CMV disease in 31 CMV-seropositive heart transplant recipients who had received early immunoprophylaxis with OKT3 monoclonal antibodies. The incidence of CMV disease and visceral involvement was much higher in the CMV immunoglobulin group than in the ganciclovir group (40 versus 6%, respectively; P = 0.03). No adverse effects were found in the CMV immunoglobulin group, but 19% of the patients in the ganciclovir group developed mild leukopenia or a mild increase in their serum creatinine levels. nan nan To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost of prophylactic low-dose ganciclovir with that of immunoglobulin in renal transplant recipients at risk for primary cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease.
                A prospective, randomized trial at a 650-bed tertiary medical center hospital.
                Fifty-one consecutive CMV-seronegative patients who received renal allografts from seropositive donors between March 1990 and April 1992.
                Patient and allograft survival, and the incidence and severity of CMV disease.
                Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis with seven doses of intravenous immunoglobulin for 6-week periods (group 1, n = 27) or low-dose intravenous ganciclovir for 3 weeks (group 2, n = 24). Results were compared with those obtained in 23 CMV-seronegative historical controls who received renal allografts from CMV-seropositive donors between 1987 and 1989, and who did not receive prophylaxis for CMV (group 3).
                Both prophylactic regimens significantly reduced the incidence of invasive CMV infection (P < .05) and were well tolerated. However, the cost of ganciclovir ($350 per patient) was substantially less than that of immunoglobulin ($4000 per patient).
                These data suggest that prophylactic ganciclovir therapy provides a cost-effective approach toward significantly improving the outcome of renal transplantation in recipients at risk for primary CMV disease. The effectiveness of preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections by administering CMV hyperimmunoglobulin was evaluated in a prospective randomized trial. The patients in the treatment group (n = 50) had intravenous infusions of 2 ml/kg bodyweight of CMV-Polyglobin at three-week intervals, up to day 105 after kidney transplantation. The 50 patients in the control group received no infusions. There was no significant difference between the treatment and control groups in transplant survival or patients survival rates. But the number of symptomatic CMV infections was higher in the control (n = 11) than the treatment group (n = 5). There were also significantly fewer symptomatic herpes-simplex infections in the treatment (n = 6) than in the control group (n = 25). It is concluded from these results that prophylaxis with CMV hyperimmunoglobulin should be undertaken either selectively or for shorter periods than those chosen for the reported trial. We have conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of human lymphoblastoid interferon prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in 74 renal transplant recipients. Interferon (3 x 10(6) units was given thrice weekly for the first 6 weeks, then twice weekly for a further 8 weeks. During the period of interferon therapy, the incidence of CMV excretion was lower in the interferon group (28% versus 50%, P = 0.065), mainly due to a significant reduction of CMV reactivation (9% versus 56%, P = 0.02). However, for the whole study period (including the follow-up period after interferon therapy), there was no difference in the incidence of CMV excretion (44% versus 53%). The onset of CMV excretion was delayed (8.2 +/- 0.8 to 20.9 +/- 5.5 weeks, P = 0.04). The duration of CMV excretion was also reduced (11.1 +/- 3.1 to 29.4 +/- 5.7 weeks, P = 0.008). The number of positive CMV isolates from urine and saliva was significantly less in the interferon group. There was no difference in the site of CMV excretion. Of the patients in the treatment group who excreted CMV, 43% developed disease as compared to 63% in the control group (difference not significant). There was also no significant difference in the severity of the CMV infection between the two groups. Benefit appears to be restricted to seropositive recipients of seronegative kidneys. The interferon regime used in this study was well tolerated, with mild fever being the only reported side-effect. No patient had to stop therapy because of toxicity. The incidence of rejection and graft loss was not different between the two groups. In a double-blind placebo-controlled study, the value of prophylactic anti-CMV immunoglobulin administration was evaluated in 39 kidney transplant recipients treated for rejection with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Passive immunization completely prevented CMV-related death, although it did not reduce the incidence of CMV isolation, viremia, or disease. The effect of passive immunization was exclusively observed in CMV-seronegative recipients of a CMV-seropositive kidney donor. It could be demonstrated even when instituted when antirejection therapy was started. Seropositive recipients did not benefit from immunoglobulin treatment. Moreover, CMV-seronegative recipients of a kidney from a seronegative donor were not at risk for CMV infection at all. Therefore passive immunization should be restricted to seronegative recipients of seropositive allograft donors treated for rejection. Cytomegalovirus disease occurs frequently after solid organ transplantation and has been associated with decreased patient and allograft survival. We hypothesized that CMV transmission or reactivation begins immediately or soon after transplantation, and that a short-duration ganciclovir (GCV)-based regimen would obviate the need for long-term antiviral agent administration, perhaps serving to interdict CMV infection and disease as well as, or perhaps even more effectively than, a more prolonged, oral acyclovir (ACV)-based form of prophylaxis. A total of 311 patients were stratified according to allograft type, age, and presence or absence or diabetes mellitus, and were then randomized to receive either long-duration ACV prophylaxis (800 mg orally or 400 mg i.v. q.i.d. for 12 weeks after transplantation or 6 weeks after any antirejection therapy) versus short-duration GCV (5 mg/kg/12 hr i.v. for 7 days after transplant or after any antirejection therapy) plus human immune globulin (HIg; Sandoglobulin or Minnesota CMV immune globulin) 100 mg/kg i.v. administered on days 1, 4, and 7 after transplant or after any antirejection therapy. A total of 266 patients (ACV, n = 133; GCV+HIg, n = 133) completed the protocol and were available for follow-up. CMV disease occurred in fewer patients (n = 28, 21.0%) in the ACV group, while significantly more patients (n = 42, 31.6%) in the GCV + HIg group developed group developed CMV disease slightly later (2.83 +/- 0.70 months) than those who received GCV/HIg (2.15 +/- 0.21 months, P > 0.01). Multivariate analysis demonstrated (2.15 +/- 0.21 months, P > 0.1). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that receiving antirejection therapy, a liver transplant, or a donor organ from a CMV-seropositive individual if the recipient was CMV seronegative were major risk factors for the development of CMV disease (P < 0.001), while the difference between ACV versus GCV + HIg prophylaxis was also significant (P = 0.054). No differences in actuarial patient or allograft survival, however, were noted between the 2 prophylaxis groups. Overall, ACV prophylaxis appeared to be more effective in reducing the incidence of posttransplant CMV disease, although this effect was diminished in high-risk groups of patients. Our findings indicate that CMV transmission or reactivation may best be prevented by long-term antiviral agent administration, and that the primary morbidity of CMV disease is the need for rehospitalization when either prolonged ACV or short-duration GCV + HIg prophylaxis is used in this patient population. nan nan We undertook a prospective randomized trial to examine whether an intravenous cytomegalovirus (CMV) immune globulin would prevent primary CMV disease in renal-transplant recipients. Fifty-nine CMV-seronegative patients who received kidneys from donors who had antibodies against CMV were assigned to receive either intravenous CMV immune globulin or no treatment. The immune globulin was administered in multiple doses over the first four months after transplantation. The incidence of virologically confirmed CMV-associated syndromes was reduced from 60 percent in controls to 21 percent in recipients of CMV immune globulin (P less than 0.01). Fungal or parasitic superinfections were not seen in globulin recipients but occurred in 20 percent of controls (P = 0.05). Only 4 percent of globulin recipients had marked leukopenia (reflecting serious CMV disease), as compared with 37 percent of the controls (P less than 0.01). There was a concomitant but not statistically significant reduction in the incidence of CMV pneumonia (17 percent of controls as compared with 4 percent of globulin recipients). A significant reduction in serious CMV-associated disease was observed even when patients were stratified according to therapy for transplant rejection (P = 0.04). We observed no effect of immune globulin on rates of viral isolation or seroconversion, suggesting that treated patients often harbored the virus but that clinically evident disease was much less likely to develop in them. We conclude that CMV immune globulin provides effective prophylaxis in renal-transplant recipients at risk for primary CMV disease. We have previously demonstrated that six weeks of prophylaxis with interferon-alpha delays cytomegalovirus excretion and decreases viremia in recipients of kidney transplants. In a double-blind trial to evaluate the effects of a longer course of prophylaxis, we gave either 3 X 10(6) units of interferon or placebo intramuscularly to 42 patients before transplant surgery was performed. After surgery, doses were given three times a week for six weeks and then twice a week for eight weeks (total of 102 X 10(6) units). Clinical signs of cytomegalovirus infection were markedly reduced in interferon recipients. These signs developed in 7 of 22 placebo recipients and 1 of 20 interferon recipients (P = 0.03). Opportunistic superinfections (Aspergillus fumigatus and Pneumocystis carinii) occurred only in patients given placebo. Cytomegalovirus-associated glomerulopathy developed in one interferon recipient and three placebo recipients. Survival of patients and grafts was equivalent in both treatment groups, and minimal toxicity was observed with interferon. In seropositive renal-transplant recipients, interferon-alpha affords effective prophylaxis against serious cytomegalovirus infections. 91 renal transplant candidates were randomised to receive Towne strain cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine or placebo at least 8 weeks before transplantation. The vaccine was well tolerated and there was no vaccine virus excretion. Serological and cellular immune responses developed in most vaccines but were lower in the transplant patients than in healthy volunteers and some of the seronegative patients failed to mount responses. CMV infection occurred in most of the seronegative vaccine-treated or placebo-treated patients who received kidneys from seropositive donors, but the illnesses were less severe in the vaccines than those in similarly exposed placebo-treated patients. Vaccine-treated patients who received kidneys from seronegative donors did not excrete virus, and therefore the vaccine virus was not reactivated from a putative latent state despite immunosuppression at the time of transplantation. A randomized study of prophylaxis with hyperimmune globulin (HIg) was performed in 28 cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative heart and kidney recipients with CMV-seropositive donors who were extensively monitored for active CMV infection and CMV disease. Detection of CMV antigen in peripheral blood granulocytes (antigenemia) was the first sign of primary CMV infection, generally occurring several weeks before IgM or IgG anti-CMV antibodies were detected and before positive cultures appeared. A correlation was found between rejection treatment with OKT3 or ATG, severity of CMV disease, and graft loss. Rejection treatment had no influence on incidence of CMV transmission. Primary CMV infection occurred most often in older patients with older donors. No beneficial effects were seen with HIg prophylaxis, which was administered from week 1 until week 7 after transplantation. Incidence of primary CMV infection was equal in both groups (50%) and no influence on the severity of primary CMV infection was seen. The only effect that was seen was on the time from transplantation to detection of active CMV infection, which was prolonged by HIg prophylaxis. In this prospective randomized study including 28 patients, we show that, in cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative renal transplant recipients (R-) receiving a CMV-seropositive graft (D+), high doses of acyclovir (ACV, i.e. 3,200 mg/day) during the first 3 months after transplantation were as efficient as hyperimmune CMV immunoglobulins (CMV Igs) plus high doses of ACV regarding the prophylaxis of CMV primoinfection. Fifty-four percent of the patients in the ACV arm and 50% in the other arm presented at least one episode of viremia (n.s.). The incidence of CMV disease was 31% in the ACV group and 20% in the ACV + CMV Ig group (n.s.). By comparison with historical controls (no prophylaxis), we found that ACV with or without CMV Ig significantly delayed and significantly decreased the rate of CMV disease, although the severity score was not statistically different. Moreover, high doses of ACV were far less expensive than their combination with hyperimmune CMV Igs. Thus, until oral ganciclovir is available for the prophylaxis of primary CMV infection in renal transplant patients, we recommend the use of high doses of ACV for the first 3 months after transplantation in high-risk renal transplant patients, i.e. D+/R-. To assess the efficacy of acyclovir and intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis in high-risk recipients of solid organ transplants.
                We randomized 21 CMV-seronegative organ transplant recipients with seropositive donors (D+R-) to receive oral acyclovir, 800 mg four times daily, or, in addition to acyclovir, IVIG, 300 mg/kg, every 2 weeks for six doses. Patients were followed closely for the development of CMV infection and disease.
                All but one prophylactically treated patient (95%) developed CMV infection. Fifteen of 21 patients (71%) who received prophylaxis fulfilled criteria for CMV disease. Disease onset was delayed in those who received IVIG, but this did not reach statistical significance. Ganciclovir was used for treatment in 15 of the 21 patients (71%).
                Acyclovir, with or without IVIG, did not prevent primary CMV infection or disease in D+R- solid organ transplant recipients at our institution. Moreover, most patients were treated with ganciclovir despite the use of prophylaxis. Given the ready availability of ganciclovir to treat CMV disease, we recommend a reappraisal of the role of CMV prophylaxis by these means in the solid organ transplant population. To determine whether polyvalent, immune globulin (IgG) prevents cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after cadaver renal transplantation, 28 patients were randomly allocated to receive 12 weekly infusions of 500 mg/kg of IgG (n = 15) or no treatment (n = 13). Both groups were similar with respect to age, sex, antigen mismatches, number of diabetics, and pretransplant donor/recipient CMV antibody titers. Moderately severe CMV infections occurred in 10 (77%) of 13 control subjects compared with 8 (53%) of 15 IgG-treated patients (not significant). Among those who developed CMV infections, prophylactic IgG had no effect on the severity or duration of fever, leukopenia, or hepatic enzyme elevations. Since none of the IgG-treated patients or control subjects in this study developed life-threatening CMV complications, a beneficial effect of prophylactic IgG in the small number of patients at risk for more severe CMV infections could not be excluded. However, this investigation suggests that the routine, prophylactic administration of polyvalent IgG, to prevent or to ameliorate CMV infection in unselected cadaver renal transplant recipients, is not warranted. nan