A comparison between aspirin and pentoxifylline in relieving claudication due to peripheral vascular disease in the elderly. Effects of flunarizine and pentoxifylline on walking distance and blood rheology in claudication. Does pentoxifylline prolong the walking distance in exercised claudicants? A placebo-controlled double-blind trial. Intermittent claudication: a double-blind crossover trial of pentoxifylline. Beneficial hemorheologic therapy of chronic peripheral arterial disorders with pentoxifylline: results of double-blind study versus vasodilator-nylidrin. [Treatment of arterial diseases with trental 400. Results of a double-blind study]. Does oxpentifylline ('Trental') have a place in the treatment of intermittent claudication? A comparison of cilostazol and pentoxifylline for treating intermittent claudication. Conservative drug treatment in patients with moderately severe chronic occlusive peripheral arterial disease. Scandinavian Study Group. Comparative evaluation of pentoxifylline, buflomedil, and nifedipine in the treatment of intermittent claudication of the lower limbs. Treatment of intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline: a 12-month, randomized trial--walking distance and microcirculation. A randomized trial of iloprost in patients with intermittent claudication. Placebo controlled double blind study with pentoxifylline of walking performance in patients with intermittent claudication. Differential effects of cilostazol and pentoxifylline on vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with intermittent claudication. Pharmacologic treatment of intermittent claudication. Pentoxifylline efficacy in the treatment of intermittent claudication: multicenter controlled double-blind trial with objective assessment of chronic occlusive arterial disease patients. Treatment of long-distance intermittent claudication with pentoxifylline: a 12-month, randomized trial.
Peripheral vascular disease (PVD) commonly presents with leg claudication during walking and eventually limits the walking distance and daily activities. Aspirin or pentoxifylline are commonly prescribed to improve blood flow. Aspirin works through its antiplatelet aggregation mechanism, and pentoxifylline increases the red blood cell flexibility, which leads to increased tissue perfusion. Data on comparative studies of these drugs for improving claudication in the elderly are limited. The objective of this study was to compare pain relief offered by either aspirin or pentoxifylline for walking leg pain in the elderly with PVD. Patients sixty-five years or older with claudication were randomly assigned to receive aspirin or pentoxifylline. Their reported level of walking claudication pain with use of the visual analogue scale (0-5) and the distance walked during exercises were recorded. Six weeks later the same parameters were recorded and results were compared with Student's t test, and a P value less than 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. Of the 90 patients who participated, 45 received aspirin (325 mg daily) and 45 were prescribed pentoxifylline (400 mg tid) for six weeks. Both the aspirin and the pentoxifylline groups reported a moderate level of pain (2/5) and remained about the same (2/5 for aspirin and 1/5 for pentoxifylline, P = 0.9, NS) after six weeks. However, the pentoxifylline group reported a farther walking distance of 2 miles compared with the aspirin group of 1.2 miles (P < 0.05). The level of pain did not change significantly with either aspirin or pentoxifylline, but the walking distance was farther with the pentoxifylline group. Thirty-one patients, mean age 60 years (range 45-80 years), with a typical history and objective symptoms of intermittent claudication with a reported maximal walking distance less than 500 m, were included in a cross-over study. After a one month's run-in period on placebo, the patients were randomized into two groups: one group started with flunarizine (5 mg t.i.d.) and the other with pentoxifylline (400 mg t.i.d.). The treatment lasted 3 months, whereafter the medications were changed. The trial followed a double-blind design. The median of the maximal walking distance was 255 m after the placebo period, increasing significantly (p less than 0.01) during both medication periods: by 43% and 18% during flunarizine and pentoxifylline, respectively. No changes were recorded in the ankle systolic blood pressure ratio ( ASBP -ratio) after placebo or either medication period. Red cell rigidity (Pmax), which was initially elevated, decreased significantly (p less than 0.05) during both medication periods, but there were no significant differences between the two drugs. No changes were found in whole blood or plasma viscosity. We conclude that the decrease in red cell rigidity may have contributed to the increased walking distance. The aim of this study was to test whether in claudicants oral pentoxifylline, given for twelve weeks in addition to physical exercise, prolongs the walking distance more than placebo plus exercise. Forty outpatients were randomized into group A (2 x 600 mg oral pentoxifylline per day) or group B (placebo). Both groups received the same exercise program in addition. The maximal and painfree walking distances and blood viscosity were measured. Intergroup differences in terms of blood viscosity reached the level of significance only after twelve weeks (p = 0.006 at shear rate of 94.5 s-1), but values of group A continuously decreased and those of group B continuously increased. After one and eight weeks, but not after twelve weeks, the maximal walking distances were significantly longer in group A than in group B. At no point were there significant intergroup differences in terms of painfree walking distance. The data suggest that pentoxifylline is clinically effective in claudicants even when given in addition to exercise. The benefit of drug plus physical therapy compared with exercise alone could be observed mainly in the first weeks of treatment and may wear off during long-term therapy. The influence of the xanthine derivative pentoxifylline ('Trental' or BL191; Hoechst-Roussel) on exercise tolerance was measured in 38 subjects with stable, severe to moderately severe, intermittent claudication who completed a randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, cross-over clinical trial. Patients received placebo tablets or 400 mg slow-release pentoxifylline tablets ('Trental 400') twice a day for one week, followed by three times daily for seven weeks, and then crossed over to receive the alternate preparation for another eight weeks. Claudication distance and walking distance were measured on a treadmill before starting treatment and again at four-week intervals during the trial. At the same times, red blood cell filterability, plasma fibrinogen concentration and blood viscosity, resting and post-ischemic calf muscle blood flow, and the resting and post-exercise ankle/brachial systolic pressure ratio were also measured. In this study, the observed effects of pentoxifylline treatment were no greater than those of placebo, even though serum levels of pentoxifylline and its hydroxy-metabolite were within the anticipated range. This was shown by a 'therapeutic effect ratio' of 0.98 for treadmill claudication distance and 0.96 for treadmill walking distance after within-patient analysis at the end of the cross-over (where a ratio of 1.0 means the test drug and placebo effects are identical). These ratios have 95% confidence limits of 0.72-1.34 and 0.74-1.25, respectively. Pentoxifylline (Trental 400 mg coated tablets) and nylidrin HCl 3 mg were compared for clinical efficacy and safety in an 8-week randomized double-blind trial. The study was conducted in patients with peripheral arterial disease (Fontaine stage II or III), with 30 patients receiving pentoxifylline (23 returned for follow-up), and 30 patients receiving nylidrin HCl (24 returned for follow-up). Efficacy was assessed objectively in terms of walking performance (absolute walking time and walking distance on a treadmill ergometer) and by acral plethysmography. The clear improvement shown for both variables was greater and statistically significant (p less than or equal to 0.05) after treatment with pentoxifylline. Laboratory data provided no evidence to suggest any adverse effect of either treatment. Subjective side effects were reported by six patients in the pentoxifylline group and by three patients in the nylidrin HCl group. nan In a randomized double-blind study, the clinical and haemorrheological responses of 40 patients receiving oxpentifylline (200 mg 3-times daily) were compared with those of 40 patients receiving placebo. The treatment period in both groups was 2 months. The parameters measured before and after treatment were: subjective response; claudication and maximum walking distances; ankle systolic indices; maximum blood flow in the lower limb by gravimetric plethysmography; plasma fibrinogen; erythrocyte deformability and whole blood viscosity. There was a significant increase (p less than 0.05) in mean erythrocyte deformability in the oxpentifylline group but not in the placebo group; this apparent difference between the groups, however, was not significant. The placebo group showed a significant improvement (p less than 0.05) in claudication distance and mean plasma fibrinogen concentration, but no such improvements were observed in the oxpentifylline group. There were no significant differences in either of the two groups with regard to the subjective response, ankle systolic indices, maximum limb blood flow or whole blood viscosity. It is concluded that oxpentifylline , when taken in oral form at the dose used in this study, increased erythrocyte deformability without conferring any clinical or haemorrheological benefit to patients with intermittent claudication. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of cilostazol and pentoxifylline.
                We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe claudication from 54 outpatient vascular clinics, including sites at Air Force, Veterans Affairs, tertiary care, and university medical centers in the United States. Of 922 consenting patients, 698 met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to blinded treatment with either cilostazol (100 mg orally twice a day), pentoxifylline (400 mg orally 3 times a day), or placebo. We measured maximal walking distance with constant-speed, variable-grade treadmill testing at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 weeks.
                Mean maximal walking distance of cilostazol-treated patients (n = 227) was significantly greater at every postbaseline visit compared with patients who received pentoxifylline (n = 232) or placebo (n = 239). After 24 weeks of treatment, mean maximal walking distance increased by a mean of 107 m (a mean percent increase of 54% from baseline) in the cilostazol group, significantly more than the 64-m improvement (a 30% mean percent increase) with pentoxifylline (P <0.001). The improvement with pentoxifylline was similar (P = 0.82) to that in the placebo group (65 m, a 34% mean percent increase). Deaths and serious adverse event rates were similar in each group. Side effects (including headache, palpitations, and diarrhea) were more common in the cilostazol-treated patients, but withdrawal rates were similar in the cilostazol (16%) and pentoxifylline (19%) groups.
                Cilostazol was significantly better than pentoxifylline or placebo for increasing walking distances in patients with intermittent claudication, but was associated with a greater frequency of minor side effects. Pentoxifylline and placebo had similar effects. A double-blind, parallel group, multicenter clinical trial of pentoxifylline compared with placebo enrolled 150 patients with moderately severe chronic occlusive arterial disease (COAD) at three centers in Scandinavia. The study consisted of a 4-6 week single-blind, placebo-controlled run-in phase, during which the stabilization of the initial claudication distance of all patients was assessed before randomization to a 6-month double-blind observation period. The diagnosis of COAD was established by clinical findings, conventional angiography, and noninvasive peripheral Doppler pressure assessment at rest and after exercise. The results of the overall intention-to-treat analysis of the study population show statistically significant superiority of pentoxifylline over placebo for all absolute claudication distance summary and end point measures. By using two clinically relevant parameters, which are a resting ankle/arm pressure ratio 0.8 or less and a duration of COAD for greater than 1 year, a target population could be defined in whom trial results became highly significant. For nontarget patients with mild COAD, we conclude that basic therapeutic measures should include the treatment of risk factors and the initiation of physical training. For target patients, however, a multifactorial therapeutic approach, including the use of pentoxifylline, is justified. In the light of the current controversy surrounding the use of hemorheologic and vasodilator drugs in the treatment of peripheral arteriosclerosis, a comparative study was designed in order to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline, buflomedil, and nifedipine in 45 patients with peripheral arterial disease (Fontaine stage II). The patients in this prospective randomized study were divided into three groups: 15 patients received pentoxifylline treatment (1,200 mg/day), 15 were treated with buflomedil (600 mg/day), and 15 with nifedipine (60 mg/day). Response to treatment was assessed at the start of the study and after forty-five and ninety days, by clinical examination, Doppler test, strain test, and digital occlusion plethysmography using a strain gauge ring. Pentoxifylline was significantly more effective (P < 0.05) than buflomedil and nifedipine at ninety days in improving walking performance, resting toe pressure, resting and postexercise ankle/brachial pressure ratio, and basal/postischemic toe-pulse ratio. Significant differences within groups were also noted for initial claudication, toe peak-flow time, pulse reappearance time (PRT/2), and maximum postischemic flow time, together with significant intergroup variables. In conclusion, pentoxifylline proved more effective than the other drugs tested in: 1. improving distal pressure and resting microcirculatory blood flow; 2. increasing postexercise distal flow, ratios, and pressures and enabling faster recuperation of basal pulse rates; 3. increasing initial claudication distance in the strain test within the test group and achieving a greater absolute subjective claudication distance than that obtained using the other treatments. The efficacy, safety and cost of pentoxifylline (PXF) in severe intermittent claudication was studied comparing PXF and placebo in a 12-month study. A treadmill test and microcirculatory evaluation with laser Doppler flowmetry were performed at inclusion and at the end of 6 and 12 months. A physical training plan (based on walking) and reduction in risk factor levels plan was used in both groups. Of the 120 included patients, 101 completed the study: 56 in the PXF group and 45 in the placebo group. There were 19 dropouts (due to low compliance). The two groups were comparable for age, sex distribution, walking distance, and the presence of risk factors and smoking. Intention-to-treat analysis indicated a 268% increase in walking distance in the PXF group (vs 198% in the placebo group; p<0.05) at 6 months and an increase of 404% (vs 280% in the placebo group; p<0.02) at 12 months. The absolute and percent increase in pain-free walking distance (PFWD) was greater in the PXF group (p<0.05). Treatment was well tolerated. No serious drug-related side effects were observed. Microcirculatory evaluation indicated an increase in flux (p < 0.05) in the PXF group (not significant in the placebo group); the after-exercise flux (AEF) was increased (p<0.05) in both groups at 6 months but the increase in AEF was greater in the PXF group at 12 month. In conclusion, between-group analysis favors PXF considering walking distance and microcirculatory parameters. Results indicate good efficacy and tolerability. Prostanoids, which promote vasodilation and reduce platelet aggregation, have been proposed as candidate therapies for intermittent claudication due to peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, studies of these medications have yielded inconsistent results. This study tested the hypothesis that iloprost, an oral prostacyclin analogue, would improve walking distance and quality of life in patients with intermittent claudication. The study was a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing three doses of oral iloprost (50 microg, 100 microg, or 150 microg twice daily), pentoxifylline, or placebo in 430 patients with intermittent claudication. The primary outcome measure was improvement in absolute claudication distance (ACD) after 6 months. Secondary outcomes included initial claudication distance and quality of life assessment. Placebo increased ACD by 3.3%, and iloprost increased peak ACD by 7.7%, 8.8% and 11.2% at the 50 microg, 100 microg, and 150 microg twice-daily doses, respectively (all insignificant relative to placebo). Pentoxifylline increased ACD by 13.9% relative to placebo (p = 0.039). Neither iloprost nor pentoxifylline enhanced quality of life. These results indicate that oral iloprost is not effective in improving exercise performance or quality of life in patients with PAD who have intermittent claudication. A double blind placebo-controlled randomised crossover study was performed with Pentoxifylline (Trental 400 tablets with 400 mg active ingredient) in 24 patients (19 males, 5 females, aged between 40 and 71 years) suffering from peripheral occlusive arteriopathy of stage II severity (Fontaine's classification). In 12 patients (group I) the treatment was started with placebo, and in another 12 subjects with Pentoxifylline (group II). The dosage was 3 tablets of either formulation t.d.s., the treatment periods were 8 weeks each with a two week washout between. The standardised walking test (120 steps/min under metronome control) was used for the assessment of the walking capacity. There was a significant 60% increase in pain-free walking distance in either Pentoxifylline treatment periods, whereas there were no clinically relevant changes in the placebo periods. When comparing the two starting periods only, there was an increase in the Pentoxifylline group from 223 to 359 m on average and in the placebo group from 208 to 215 m, patients in both groups being comparable at basal level as to the distribution of sex, age, location of occlusion, duration of disease as well as in respect to the walking capacity. No adverse reactions were recorded during the trial. Cilostazol is a new phosphodiesterase inhibitor with anti-platelet and vasodilatory properties. Cilostazol and pentoxifylline are the only two drugs that have been approved for the treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. However, the mechanisms by which exercise tolerance is improved remain unclear. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a potent endothelial mitogen that results in angiogenesis when overexpressed in human subjects. To assess the potential role of VEGF in the improvement in exercise tolerance, we investigated plasma levels of VEGF in 50 patients with intermittent claudication who were allocated randomly to groups receiving cilostazol (n=17), pentoxifylline (n=17) or placebo (n=16). Patients given either cilostazol or pentoxifylline showed a significant improvements in maximal walking distance compared with the placebo group (34 m and 33 m respectively, compared with 5 m; both P<0.05). Neither cilostazol nor pentoxifylline increased the ankle-brachial index after treatment. Circulating VEGF levels were increased (from 116+/-29 to 169+/-45 pg/ml; P=0.002), and the levels of VEGF were correlated significantly with exercise tolerance in a positive direction (r=0.88, P=0.004), in those patients treated with cilostazol that did not have diabetes mellitus. In contrast, VEGF levels remained stable after the administration of pentoxifylline. These findings suggest that VEGF may contribute to the cilostazol-related improvement in exercise tolerance in non-diabetic patients. However, pentoxifylline did not affect VEGF levels, although a similar improvement in maximal walking distance was achieved. Thus the mechanisms involved in the pentoxifylline-treated group were different from those in the cilostazol-treated group, and require further study. Twenty-six patients with severe short-distance claudication underwent a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group evaluation of the efficacy of pentoxifylline in the treatment of intermittent claudication. The primary variables analyzed were the initial and absolute claudication distances as determined by standardized treadmill walking. A statistically significant improvement in both parameters was present in the pentoxifylline-treated patients. Nausea was the only drug side effect noted. The efficacy, safety, and tolerance of pentoxifylline (Trental, Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) in the treatment of intermittent claudication associated with chronic occlusive arterial disease (COAD) were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter clinical trial involving a total of 128 outpatients. The response to treatment was ascertained at regular intervals during the trial by measuring the distance walked prior to the onset of claudication when patients were subjected to a standardized treadmill test. Pentoxifylline given orally in doses up to 1200 mg/day was significantly more effective than placebo in increasing both the initial and absolute claudication distances in patients with COAD. Reduction of lower limb paresthesias also suggested greater clinical improvement in the pentoxifylline treated patients. These results support the hypothesis that pentoxifylline reduces blood viscosity by improving red cell flexibility, and thereby enhances blood flow in patients with COAD. White the precise mode of therapeutic action requires clarification, pentoxifylline was well tolerated with minimal unwanted effects. The efficacy, safety, and cost of pentoxifylline (PXF) in long-range (>400 m interval) intermittent claudication was studied comparing PXF and placebo in a 12-month study. A standardized treadmill test was performed at inclusion and at 6 and 12 months. A training plan based on walking was associated with the control of risk factor levels. Of the 194 included patients, 135 completed the study: 75 in the PXF group and 60 in the placebo group. There were 59 dropouts (due to low compliance). The authors observed a 148% increase in total walking distance (TWD) at 6 months with PXF (vs 110% with placebo; p<0.05); at 12 months, the increase was 170% with PXF (vs 131% with placebo; p<0.02). There was a 38% difference at 6 months and 39% at 12 months in favor of PXF. Treatment was well tolerated. In conclusion, PXF improved walking distance significantly better than placebo.