Surgical versus percutaneous technique for veno-venous bypass during orthotopic liver transplantation: a prospective randomized study. The significance of heparin-coated veno-venous bypass circuits in liver transplantation. Effect of venovenous bypass on perioperative renal function in liver transplantation: results of a randomized, controlled trial. The effect of venovenous bypass on lactic acid levels during human liver transplantation (OLT).
nan We studied the effects of veno-venous bypass (VVBP) circuit surface heparinization on the activation of the plasma defence systems (coagulation, fibrinolysis, kallikrein-kinin and complement) and leukocyte activation in a prospective randomized study in 20 patients during and 1 day after liver transplantation (OLT). To our knowledge, this is the first study of this kind where the possible benefits of surface heparinization of the VVBP circuit in OLT have been investigated. Twenty patients were randomized to either heparin-coated (HC) VVBP equipment or to otherwise identical noncoated (NC) circuits. Five blood samples were drawn during the OLT procedure: one just before VVBP, three during VVBP and one 5 min after portal venous reperfusion (PVR). A further sample was taken 1 day after the operation. Components of the blood coagulation, fibrinolytic and kallikrein-kinin systems were analysed using functional assays (chromogenic peptide substrate assays) or enzyme immunoassays (EIA). Complement system factors and granulocyte activation, represented by myeloperoxidase (MPO) release, were analyzed by EIA. Activation of the plasma defence systems occurred in both groups at an early stage during OLT and a further activation occurred 5 min after PVR. MPO levels were slightly elevated 5 min after PVR. However, no significant differences between the two groups were observed. Significant activation of the humoral defense systems was found in both groups during OLT. A considerably larger study, including at least 330 patients, is necessary to fully assess the possible benefits of surface heparinization of the VVBP circuit. Although venovenous bypass (VVBP) has been suggested to protect the kidneys during liver transplantation and its systematic use has therefore been recommended, this beneficial effect of VVBP has not been clearly demonstrated. In a prospective, randomized, controlled trial, 77 patients receiving liver transplants for chronic liver disease were allocated to be supported with VVBP (group 1, 38 patients) or not (group 2, 39 patients). Both groups were similar in relation to preoperative clinical and laboratory data and operative transfusion requirements. Inulin clearance and urinary beta(2)-microglobulin and N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) excretion (to determine glomerular filtration rate and tubular damage, respectively) were measured at different perioperative periods (anesthesia induction, hepatectomy, anhepatic phase, biliary anastomosis, and 24 hours after surgery). A significant decrease in inulin clearance and increase in tubular damage markers were observed in the anhepatic phase, which only partly improved in the subsequent phases. No significant differences were observed between groups 1 and 2 at any perioperative phase, except during the anhepatic phase, in which a more marked renal function impairment occurred in group 2 patients. However, renal function on the 7th postoperative day and the need for hemodialysis/ hemofiltration during the 1st week were similar in both groups. Among 40 variables analyzed, only low mean arterial pressure at anesthesia induction was identified as an independent predictor for early postoperative severe renal failure (inulin clearance < 10 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at the 24th postoperative hour), with no significant relationship between this complication and the use of venovenous bypass. Renal function markedly deteriorates during liver transplantation, and renal impairment persists during the early postoperative period. Because VVBP support is not associated with any clear benefit in renal function, its systematic use does not seem to be justified. Lactate determinations did not contribute to the quantification of the systemic and regional tissue oxygenation during OLT. Venous stasis was not an important factor in the tissue imbalance between oxygen supply and oxygen demand.