Y Benchmarks [2110313-HA-Y3267375361] - OpenBenchmarking.org\n2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y testing with a Supermicro X12DPU-6 v1.02 (1.1 BIOS) and ASPEED on Ubuntu 20.04 via the Phoronix Test Suite.\nCompare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 2110313-HA-Y3267375361\n3 Days, 2 Hours, 20 Minutes\nProcessor: 2 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y @ 3.50GHz (72 Cores / 144 Threads), Motherboard: Supermicro X12DPU-6 v1.02 (1.1 BIOS), Chipset: Intel Device 0998, Memory: 32 x 64 GB DDR4-3200MT/s HMAA8GR7AJR4N-XN, Disk: 4001GB P34UTR-04T0H-ST + 960GB INTEL SSDSC2KG96, Graphics: ASPEED, Network: 2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 + 2 x Intel 10G X550T\nOS: Ubuntu 20.04, Kernel: 5.11.0-38-generic (x86_64), Desktop: GNOME Shell 3.36.9, Display Server: X Server 1.20.8, Display Driver: modesetting 1.20.8, Vulkan: 1.0.2, Compiler: GCC 9.3.0, File-System: ext4, Screen Resolution: 1024x768\nProcessor Notes: Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xd0002a0\nyOpenBenchmarking.orgPhoronix Test Suite 10.8.02 x Intel Xeon Platinum 8360Y @ 3.50GHz (72 Cores / 144 Threads)Supermicro X12DPU-6 v1.02 (1.1 BIOS)Intel Device 099832 x 64 GB DDR4-3200MT/s HMAA8GR7AJR4N-XN4001GB P34UTR-04T0H-ST + 960GB INTEL SSDSC2KG96ASPEED2 x Intel 10-Gigabit X540-AT2 + 2 x Intel 10G X550TUbuntu 20.045.11.0-38-generic (x86_64)GNOME Shell 3.36.9X Server 1.20.8modesetting 1.20.81.0.2GCC 9.3.0ext41024x768ProcessorMotherboardChipsetMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDesktopDisplay ServerDisplay DriverVulkanCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionY BenchmarksSystem Logs- --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-vtable-verify --disable-werror --enable-checking=release --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-default-pie --enable-gnu-unique-object --enable-languages=c,ada,c++,go,brig,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++,gm2 --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-multiarch --enable-multilib --enable-nls --enable-objc-gc=auto --enable-offload-targets=nvptx-none=/build/gcc-9-HskZEa/gcc-9-9.3.0/debian/tmp-nvptx/usr,hsa --enable-plugin --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --program-prefix=x86_64-linux-gnu- --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --with-abi=m64 --with-arch-32=i686 --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=new --with-gcc-major-version-only --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --with-target-system-zlib=auto --with-tune=generic --without-cuda-driver -v - NONE / errors=remount-ro,relatime,rw / Block Size: 4096- Scaling Governor: acpi-cpufreq ondemand (Boost: Enabled) - CPU Microcode: 0xd0002a0- Python 3.8.10- itlb_multihit: Not affected + l1tf: Not affected + mds: Not affected + meltdown: Not affected + spec_store_bypass: Mitigation of SSB disabled via prctl and seccomp + spectre_v1: Mitigation of usercopy/swapgs barriers and __user pointer sanitization + spectre_v2: Mitigation of Enhanced IBRS IBPB: conditional RSB filling + srbds: Not affected + tsx_async_abort: Not affected\nypostmark: Disk Transaction Performancetinymembench: Standard Memcpytinymembench: Standard Memsetmbw: Memory Copy - 128 MiBmbw: Memory Copy - 512 MiBmbw: Memory Copy - 1024 MiBmbw: Memory Copy - 4096 MiBmbw: Memory Copy - 8192 MiBmbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 128 MiBmbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 512 MiBmbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 1024 MiBmbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 4096 MiBmbw: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - 8192 MiBt-test1: 1t-test1: 2pmbench: 1 - 50%pmbench: 2 - 50%pmbench: 4 - 50%pmbench: 8 - 50%pmbench: 16 - 50%pmbench: 32 - 50%pmbench: 64 - 50%pmbench: 128 - 50%pmbench: 144 - 50%pmbench: 1 - 100% Readspmbench: 2 - 100% Readspmbench: 4 - 100% Readspmbench: 8 - 100% Readspmbench: 1 - 100% Writespmbench: 16 - 100% Readspmbench: 2 - 100% Writespmbench: 32 - 100% Readspmbench: 4 - 100% Writespmbench: 64 - 100% Readspmbench: 8 - 100% Writespmbench: 128 - 100% Readspmbench: 144 - 100% Readspmbench: 16 - 100% Writespmbench: 32 - 100% Writespmbench: 64 - 100% Writespmbench: 128 - 100% Writespmbench: 144 - 100% Writespmbench: 1 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 2 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 4 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 8 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 16 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 32 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 64 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 128 - 80% Reads 20% Writespmbench: 144 - 80% Reads 20% Writesiperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 1iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 1iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 32iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 100Mbit Objective - 64iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 32iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - 64iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 1iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 1iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 32iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - TCP - 64iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 32iperf: 5201 - 10 Seconds - UDP - 64wireguard: perf-bench: Epoll Waitperf-bench: Futex Hashperf-bench: Memcpy 1MBperf-bench: Memset 1MBperf-bench: Sched Pipeperf-bench: Futex Lock-Piperf-bench: Syscall Basicosbench: Create Filesosbench: Create Threadsosbench: Launch Programsosbench: Create Processesosbench: Memory Allocationsipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 128ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 256ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 512ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 1024ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 2048ipc-benchmark: TCP Socket - 4096ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 128ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 256ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 512ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 1024ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 2048ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Pipe - 4096ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 128ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 256ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 512ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 1024ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 2048ipc-benchmark: FIFO Named Pipe - 4096ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 128ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 256ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 512ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 1024ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 2048ipc-benchmark: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - 4096build-apache: Time To Compilebuild-ffmpeg: Time To Compilebuild-gcc: Time To Compilebuild-gdb: Time To Compilebuild-imagemagick: Time To Compilebuild-linux-kernel: Time To Compilebuild-mesa: Time To Compilebuild-mplayer: Time To Compilebuild-php: Time To Compilebuild2: Time To Compilebuild-eigen: Time To Compilehackbench: 1 - Threadhackbench: 2 - Threadhackbench: 4 - Threadhackbench: 8 - Threadhackbench: 1 - Processhackbench: 16 - Threadhackbench: 2 - Processhackbench: 4 - Processhackbench: 8 - Processhackbench: 16 - Processhackbench: 32 - Processpgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 100 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 1 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 1000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 50 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Onlypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Only - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 100 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 250 - Read Write - Average Latencypgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Writepgbench: 10000 - 500 - Read Write - Average Latencysqlite-speedtest: Timed Time - Size 1,000mutex: Shared Mutex Lock Sharedmutex: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlockmutex: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutexmutex: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutexmutex: Semaphore Release And Acquiremutex: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amdmutex: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutexmutex: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlockstress-ng: MMAPstress-ng: NUMAstress-ng: MEMFDstress-ng: Atomicstress-ng: Cryptostress-ng: Mallocstress-ng: RdRandstress-ng: Forkingstress-ng: SENDFILEstress-ng: CPU Cachestress-ng: CPU Stressstress-ng: Semaphoresstress-ng: Matrix Mathstress-ng: Vector Mathstress-ng: Memory Copyingstress-ng: Socket Activitystress-ng: Context Switchingstress-ng: Glibc C String Functionsstress-ng: Glibc Qsort Data Sortingstress-ng: System V Message Passingctx-clock: Context Switch Timeschbench: 8 - 4nn585911670.824476.18994.3849320.3539143.5708950.3738690.3416278.0246185.6765661.6995575.5905592.74933.24510.4200.05980.05910.05940.06400.06080.06700.07140.09080.09660.0260.02600.02610.02670.03040.02610.03040.02760.03030.03100.03060.05160.05390.03020.03220.03360.05870.0660.07730.07540.07650.07980.08100.09040.08740.10750.11151001000320064003199839741438111.05502685679333.667.1423.8374968312520716.21317858.83109467541381723321114.71191518.71347485.36020968.17340994.301303359381433055872858235200655314407879766572016311202496116072731403124110010182152321352372051229156352913882901063911817322137327112825631258691107788872001270224134.40920.812909.52073.33317.70826.70520.15711.30442.13764.64385.6933.1865.2409.72217.9303.16132.6605.4379.80417.90133.03762.800160020.0635231.9117474860.06713542010.07418163660.13858086.25417477970.286121630.082548182.543476524.6673611384.0654582.1906971790.07274040.13713114920.07617771760.14189935.56016897250.2964082.4515266370.09544100.227132897.5251567515.9491584431.5588135930.1236282130.40077206.4774976541.0094002.5013479160.144970910.3001163521.487900355.5517751640.1356231060.43368177.3354909321.147857811.658941226.568741867.40661.28025.943.821.126.620.748.116.631.8884.921003.494347.23198403.2512494.481381812907.56671184.7366222.231128251.429.57106249.639889177.34277079.90230556.799289.7234928.285155417.303535683.21887.952980863.53164228OpenBenchmarking.org\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostMark 1.51Disk Transaction Performancenn13002600390052006500SE +/- 46.33, N = 358591. (CC) gcc options: -O3\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterTinymembench 2018-05-28Standard Memcpynn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 17.38, N = 311670.81. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterTinymembench 2018-05-28Standard Memsetnn5K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 22.39, N = 324476.11. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 128 MiBnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 13.15, N = 38994.381. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 512 MiBnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 112.54, N = 39320.351. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 1024 MiBnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 84.89, N = 39143.571. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 4096 MiBnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 5.73, N = 38950.371. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy - Array Size: 8192 MiBnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 81.94, N = 38690.341. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 128 MiBnn13002600390052006500SE +/- 20.13, N = 36278.021. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 512 MiBnn13002600390052006500SE +/- 3.38, N = 36185.681. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 1024 MiBnn12002400360048006000SE +/- 27.70, N = 35661.701. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 4096 MiBnn12002400360048006000SE +/- 10.04, N = 35575.591. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiB/s, More Is BetterMBW 2018-09-08Test: Memory Copy, Fixed Block Size - Array Size: 8192 MiBnn12002400360048006000SE +/- 16.31, N = 35592.751. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 1nn816243240SE +/- 0.11, N = 333.251. (CC) gcc options: -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is Bettert-test1 2017-01-13Threads: 2nn3691215SE +/- 0.19, N = 1510.421. (CC) gcc options: -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01350.0270.04050.0540.0675SE +/- 0.0003, N = 30.05981. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01330.02660.03990.05320.0665SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.05911. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01340.02680.04020.05360.067SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.05941. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01440.02880.04320.05760.072SE +/- 0.0015, N = 150.06401. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01370.02740.04110.05480.0685SE +/- 0.0008, N = 30.06081. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01510.03020.04530.06040.0755SE +/- 0.0008, N = 120.06701. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.01610.03220.04830.06440.0805SE +/- 0.0008, N = 150.07141. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.02040.04080.06120.08160.102SE +/- 0.0008, N = 150.09081. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 50%nn0.02170.04340.06510.08680.1085SE +/- 0.0009, N = 30.09661. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.00590.01180.01770.02360.0295SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0261. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.00590.01180.01770.02360.0295SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.02601. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.00590.01180.01770.02360.0295SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.02611. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.0060.0120.0180.0240.03SE +/- 0.0004, N = 150.02671. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00680.01360.02040.02720.034SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.03041. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.00590.01180.01770.02360.0295SE +/- 0.0000, N = 30.02611. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00680.01360.02040.02720.034SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.03041. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.00620.01240.01860.02480.031SE +/- 0.0003, N = 150.02761. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00680.01360.02040.02720.034SE +/- 0.0000, N = 30.03031. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.0070.0140.0210.0280.035SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.03101. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00690.01380.02070.02760.0345SE +/- 0.0002, N = 30.03061. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.01160.02320.03480.04640.058SE +/- 0.0012, N = 120.05161. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Readsnn0.01210.02420.03630.04840.0605SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.05391. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00680.01360.02040.02720.034SE +/- 0.0003, N = 30.03021. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00720.01440.02160.02880.036SE +/- 0.0004, N = 150.03221. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.00760.01520.02280.03040.038SE +/- 0.0002, N = 140.03361. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.01320.02640.03960.05280.066SE +/- 0.0019, N = 150.05871. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 100% Writesnn0.01490.02980.04470.05960.0745SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0661. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 1 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.01740.03480.05220.06960.087SE +/- 0.0006, N = 30.07731. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 2 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.0170.0340.0510.0680.085SE +/- 0.0001, N = 30.07541. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 4 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.01720.03440.05160.06880.086SE +/- 0.0005, N = 30.07651. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 8 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.0180.0360.0540.0720.09SE +/- 0.0015, N = 150.07981. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 16 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.01820.03640.05460.07280.091SE +/- 0.0017, N = 150.08101. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 32 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.02030.04060.06090.08120.1015SE +/- 0.0019, N = 120.09041. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 64 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.01970.03940.05910.07880.0985SE +/- 0.0006, N = 30.08741. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 128 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.02420.04840.07260.09680.121SE +/- 0.0014, N = 120.10751. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus - Average Page Latency, Fewer Is BetterpmbenchConcurrent Worker Threads: 144 - Read-Write Ratio: 80% Reads 20% Writesnn0.02510.05020.07530.10040.1255SE +/- 0.0004, N = 30.11151. (CC) gcc options: -lm -luuid -lxml2 -m64 -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1nn204060801001001. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 1nn200400600800100010001. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32nn700140021002800350032001. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 100Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64nn1400280042005600700064001. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 32nn7K14K21K28K35K319981. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - 1000Mbit Objective - Parallel: 64nn9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 131.43, N = 3397411. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 1nn9K18K27K36K45KSE +/- 100.09, N = 3438111. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 1nn0.23630.47260.70890.94521.1815SE +/- 0.00, N = 31.051. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 32nn11K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 2732.20, N = 12502681. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: TCP - Parallel: 64nn12K24K36K48K60KSE +/- 2487.58, N = 12567931. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 32nn816243240SE +/- 0.00, N = 333.61. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMbits/sec, More Is BetteriPerf 3.7Server Address: localhost - Server Port: 5201 - Duration: 10 Seconds - Test: UDP - Parallel: 64nn1530456075SE +/- 0.00, N = 367.11. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -march=native -lssl -lcrypto -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterWireGuard + Linux Networking Stack Stress Testnn90180270360450SE +/- 3.89, N = 9423.84\nOpenBenchmarking.orgops/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Epoll Waitnn11002200330044005500SE +/- 47.34, N = 349681. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgops/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Futex Hashnn700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 2934.96, N = 331252071. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgGB/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Memcpy 1MBnn48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 316.211. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgGB/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Memset 1MBnn1326395265SE +/- 0.60, N = 358.831. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgops/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Sched Pipenn14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 392.35, N = 3675411. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgops/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Futex Lock-Pinn918273645381. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgops/sec, More Is Betterperf-benchBenchmark: Syscall Basicnn4M8M12M16M20MSE +/- 189446.28, N = 4172332111. (CC) gcc options: -O6 -ggdb3 -funwind-tables -std=gnu99 -Xlinker -lpthread -lrt -lm -ldl -lelf -lcrypto -lz\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create Filesnn48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 314.711. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create Threadsnn510152025SE +/- 0.11, N = 318.711. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch Programsnn20406080100SE +/- 0.28, N = 385.361. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create Processesnn1530456075SE +/- 0.08, N = 368.171. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory Allocationsnn20406080100SE +/- 0.02, N = 394.301. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 128nn800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 41424.56, N = 143593814\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 256nn700K1400K2100K2800K3500KSE +/- 5595.52, N = 33305587\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 512nn600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 28098.16, N = 152858235\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 1024nn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 17240.28, N = 82006553\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 2048nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 10691.98, N = 31440787\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: TCP Socket - Message Bytes: 4096nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 9483.22, N = 3976657\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 128nn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 45706.15, N = 142016311\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 256nn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 21374.69, N = 32024961\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 512nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 10916.78, N = 151607273\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 16629.35, N = 151403124\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 13295.53, N = 41100101\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 10388.30, N = 12821523\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 128nn500K1000K1500K2000K2500KSE +/- 26696.72, N = 152135237\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 256nn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 21663.68, N = 32051229\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 512nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 20658.12, N = 31563529\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 1024nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 18199.27, N = 141388290\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 2048nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 10465.25, N = 151063911\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: FIFO Named Pipe - Message Bytes: 4096nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 5747.84, N = 3817322\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 128nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 4219.95, N = 31373271\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 256nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 3078.08, N = 31282563\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 512nn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 1054.53, N = 31258691\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 1024nn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 8987.59, N = 31077888\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 2048nn150K300K450K600K750KSE +/- 7531.61, N = 12720012\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMessages Per Second, More Is BetterIPC_benchmarkType: Unnamed Unix Domain Socket - Message Bytes: 4096nn150K300K450K600K750KSE +/- 9610.29, N = 3702241\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Apache Compilation 2.4.41Time To Compilenn816243240SE +/- 0.09, N = 334.41\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed FFmpeg Compilation 4.4Time To Compilenn510152025SE +/- 0.10, N = 320.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GCC Compilation 11.2.0Time To Compilenn2004006008001000SE +/- 0.59, N = 3909.52\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed GDB GNU Debugger Compilation 10.2Time To Compilenn1632486480SE +/- 0.24, N = 373.33\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed ImageMagick Compilation 6.9.0Time To Compilenn48121620SE +/- 0.21, N = 317.71\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 5.14Time To Compilenn612182430SE +/- 0.28, N = 1226.71\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Mesa Compilation 21.0Time To Compilenn510152025SE +/- 0.12, N = 320.16\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MPlayer Compilation 1.4Time To Compilenn3691215SE +/- 0.13, N = 411.30\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed PHP Compilation 7.4.2Time To Compilenn1020304050SE +/- 0.28, N = 342.14\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBuild2 0.13Time To Compilenn1428425670SE +/- 0.20, N = 364.64\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Eigen Compilation 3.3.9Time To Compilenn20406080100SE +/- 0.54, N = 385.69\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 1 - Type: Threadnn0.71691.43382.15072.86763.5845SE +/- 0.214, N = 123.1861. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 2 - Type: Threadnn1.1792.3583.5374.7165.895SE +/- 0.050, N = 35.2401. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 4 - Type: Threadnn3691215SE +/- 0.038, N = 39.7221. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: Threadnn48121620SE +/- 0.05, N = 317.931. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 1 - Type: Processnn0.71121.42242.13362.84483.556SE +/- 0.171, N = 143.1611. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 16 - Type: Threadnn816243240SE +/- 0.12, N = 332.661. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 2 - Type: Processnn1.22332.44663.66994.89326.1165SE +/- 0.043, N = 35.4371. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 4 - Type: Processnn3691215SE +/- 0.054, N = 39.8041. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: Processnn48121620SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.901. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 16 - Type: Processnn816243240SE +/- 0.14, N = 333.041. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 32 - Type: Processnn1428425670SE +/- 0.11, N = 362.801. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlynn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 208.68, N = 3160021. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01420.02840.04260.05680.071SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0631. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writenn110220330440550SE +/- 4.86, N = 35231. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn0.430.861.291.722.15SE +/- 0.018, N = 31.9111. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlynn160K320K480K640K800KSE +/- 4326.73, N = 37474861. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01510.03020.04530.06040.0755SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.0671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlynn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 3134.92, N = 313542011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01670.03340.05010.06680.0835SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0741. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlynn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 18475.63, N = 618163661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.03110.06220.09330.12440.1555SE +/- 0.001, N = 60.1381. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writenn130260390520650SE +/- 2.01, N = 35801. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn20406080100SE +/- 0.30, N = 386.251. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlynn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 14346.25, N = 317477971. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.06440.12880.19320.25760.322SE +/- 0.002, N = 30.2861. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlynn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 122.84, N = 12121631. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01850.0370.05550.0740.0925SE +/- 0.001, N = 120.0821. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writenn120240360480600SE +/- 0.75, N = 35481. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn4080120160200SE +/- 0.25, N = 3182.541. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writenn100200300400500SE +/- 1.07, N = 34761. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn110220330440550SE +/- 1.18, N = 3524.671. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writenn80160240320400SE +/- 4.81, N = 33611. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn30060090012001500SE +/- 18.67, N = 31384.071. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writenn100200300400500SE +/- 7.77, N = 124581. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn0.49280.98561.47841.97122.464SE +/- 0.036, N = 122.1901. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlynn150K300K450K600K750KSE +/- 1722.86, N = 36971791. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01620.03240.04860.06480.081SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0721. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlynn16003200480064008000SE +/- 287.26, N = 974041. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.03080.06160.09240.12320.154SE +/- 0.006, N = 90.1371. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlynn300K600K900K1200K1500KSE +/- 7446.96, N = 313114921. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.01710.03420.05130.06840.0855SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.0761. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlynn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 3638.69, N = 317771761. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.03170.06340.09510.12680.1585SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.1411. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 37.13, N = 389931. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn1.2512.5023.7535.0046.255SE +/- 0.023, N = 35.5601. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlynn400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 20124.75, N = 316897251. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.06660.13320.19980.26640.333SE +/- 0.004, N = 30.2961. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writenn90180270360450SE +/- 0.85, N = 34081. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn0.55151.1031.65452.2062.7575SE +/- 0.005, N = 32.4511. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlynn110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 4605.11, N = 75266371. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.02140.04280.06420.08560.107SE +/- 0.001, N = 70.0951. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Onlynn9001800270036004500SE +/- 47.77, N = 344101. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.05110.10220.15330.20440.2555SE +/- 0.003, N = 30.2271. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writenn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 47.42, N = 3132891. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn246810SE +/- 0.027, N = 37.5251. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writenn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 35.05, N = 3156751. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn48121620SE +/- 0.04, N = 315.951. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writenn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 76.79, N = 3158441. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 100 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn714212835SE +/- 0.15, N = 331.561. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlynn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 2251.29, N = 38135931. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.02770.05540.08310.11080.1385SE +/- 0.000, N = 30.1231. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlynn130K260K390K520K650KSE +/- 15992.37, N = 96282131. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.090.180.270.360.45SE +/- 0.010, N = 90.4001. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writenn17003400510068008500SE +/- 18.22, N = 377201. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn246810SE +/- 0.015, N = 36.4771. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlynn110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 12118.06, N = 94976541. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.2270.4540.6810.9081.135SE +/- 0.024, N = 91.0091. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Writenn90180270360450SE +/- 2.56, N = 34001. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 1 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn0.56271.12541.68812.25082.8135SE +/- 0.016, N = 32.5011. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Onlynn70K140K210K280K350KSE +/- 3140.14, N = 33479161. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.03240.06480.09720.12960.162SE +/- 0.001, N = 30.1441. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 7.64, N = 397091. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn3691215SE +/- 0.01, N = 310.301. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 37.43, N = 3116351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 321.491. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 109.43, N = 390031. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 1000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn1224364860SE +/- 0.68, N = 355.551. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Onlynn170K340K510K680K850KSE +/- 60632.39, N = 97751641. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.03040.06080.09120.12160.152SE +/- 0.009, N = 90.1351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Onlynn130K260K390K520K650KSE +/- 64490.92, N = 96231061. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.09740.19480.29220.38960.487SE +/- 0.038, N = 90.4331. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Writenn15003000450060007500SE +/- 17.99, N = 368171. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 50 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn246810SE +/- 0.019, N = 37.3351. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Onlynn110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 54847.14, N = 94909321. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Only - Average Latencynn0.25810.51620.77431.03241.2905SE +/- 0.160, N = 91.1471. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 48.08, N = 385781. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 100 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn3691215SE +/- 0.07, N = 311.661. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Writenn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 95.01, N = 394121. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 250 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn612182430SE +/- 0.27, N = 326.571. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Writenn16003200480064008000SE +/- 21.41, N = 374181. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgms, Fewer Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 14.0Scaling Factor: 10000 - Clients: 500 - Mode: Read Write - Average Latencynn1530456075SE +/- 0.19, N = 367.411. (CC) gcc options: -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -O2 -lpgcommon -lpgport -lpq -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite Speedtest 3.30Timed Time - Size 1,000nn1428425670SE +/- 0.15, N = 361.281. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -ldl -lz -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Shared Mutex Lock Sharednn612182430SE +/- 0.00, N = 325.91. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlocknn1020304050SE +/- 0.03, N = 343.81. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutexnn510152025SE +/- 0.07, N = 321.11. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock std::mutexnn612182430SE +/- 0.00, N = 326.61. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Semaphore Release And Acquirenn510152025SE +/- 0.00, N = 320.71. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock spinlock_amdnn1122334455SE +/- 0.21, N = 348.11. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock pthread_mutexnn48121620SE +/- 0.00, N = 316.61. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgns, Fewer Is BetterBenchmarkMutexBenchmark: Mutex Lock Unlock ticket_spinlocknn714212835SE +/- 0.07, N = 331.81. (CXX) g++ options: -std=c++17 -lbenchmark -pthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: MMAPnn2004006008001000SE +/- 7.34, N = 3884.921. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: NUMAnn2004006008001000SE +/- 49.30, N = 121003.491. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: MEMFDnn9001800270036004500SE +/- 1.96, N = 34347.231. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Atomicnn40K80K120K160K200KSE +/- 1890.26, N = 3198403.251. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Cryptonn3K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 180.29, N = 312494.481. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Mallocnn300M600M900M1200M1500MSE +/- 3443971.06, N = 31381812907.561. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: RdRandnn140K280K420K560K700KSE +/- 38.37, N = 3671184.731. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Forkingnn14K28K42K56K70KSE +/- 101.90, N = 366222.231. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: SENDFILEnn200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 923.86, N = 31128251.421. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: CPU Cachenn3691215SE +/- 0.00, N = 39.571. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: CPU Stressnn20K40K60K80K100KSE +/- 288.02, N = 3106249.631. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Semaphoresnn2M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 8152.73, N = 39889177.341. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Matrix Mathnn60K120K180K240K300KSE +/- 3009.25, N = 3277079.901. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Vector Mathnn50K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 317.87, N = 3230556.791. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Memory Copyingnn2K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1.47, N = 39289.721. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Socket Activitynn7K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 134.79, N = 334928.281. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Context Switchingnn1.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5MSE +/- 50266.55, N = 35155417.301. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Glibc C String Functionsnn800K1600K2400K3200K4000KSE +/- 13106.31, N = 33535683.211. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: Glibc Qsort Data Sortingnn2004006008001000SE +/- 0.35, N = 3887.951. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgBogo Ops/s, More Is BetterStress-NG 0.13.02Test: System V Message Passingnn600K1200K1800K2400K3000KSE +/- 97672.93, N = 152980863.531. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -std=gnu99 -lm -lbsd -lcrypt -lrt -lz -ldl -pthread -lc -latomic\nOpenBenchmarking.orgClocks, Fewer Is Betterctx_clockContext Switch Timenn4080120160200SE +/- 6.39, N = 15164\nOpenBenchmarking.orgusec, 99.9th Latency Percentile, Fewer Is BetterSchbenchMessage Threads: 8 - Workers Per Message Thread: 4nn50100150200250SE +/- 2.38, N = 152281. (CC) gcc options: -O2 -lpthread\nTesting initiated at 29 October 2021 23:05 by user root.


NIRA LIMA (dsdnegra) on Pinterest\nCrochet TunicCrochet TopsCrochet LaceCrochet DressesLace TunicWorkBlusas TejidasPonchosTricot CrochetEleganceThreadTissuesCrochetForward\nElegancias a Crochet: En este blog podrás encontrar tejidos a crochet únicos.Túnicas en hilo y lana. Sweaters,Chalecos, ponchos etc.\nCrochet SkirtsCrochet ClothesCrochet Skirt PatternVintage Crochet DressesDiy ClothesPatchwork SkirtsCrochet TunicFreeform CrochetCrochet SweatersLong SkirtsTricot CrochetCrochet BagStrickenCrochetGanchillo CrochetWeaveForward\nVintage Crocheted Granny Maxi Skirt~~sold out on Urban Outfitters, but great inspiration!\nCrochet SkirtsCrochet TopsMy GrandmotherGrandmothersCrochet StitchesJeepsTypeTableclothsShortsKnittingLong SkirtsBe UsedCreativityCraftsWorldForward\nI spy, with my little eye, PINEAPPLES. I also see that if I were to do this it would have to a foot shorter for me and it'd still reach my ankles.\nShort SkirtsMaxi SkirtsCrochet ArtIrish CrochetCrochet PatternsCrochet DressesLace SkirtKnit WearIrish LaceAllWomenCraftsCrochetBolerosLadiesTissuesForward\nCrochet skirt with chart.\nCrochet Bolero PatternCrochet BolerosCrochet TunicCrochet ClothesCrochet TopsCrochet JumpersFree CrochetCrochet SweatersCrochet PatternsCrochet DressesBlusas TejidasMaking ArtPicasaCrochet VestCraftsClosetForward\nCrochet SweatersCrochet TopsCrochet ClothesFree CrochetKnit CrochetBolero CrochetCrochet JacketCrochet ShrugsCrochet CardiganInstructionsBlusas TejidasPonchosGiftsCartonnageStrickenEmbroideryCraftsArts And CraftsProjectsBlusas CrochetWorkCrochet VestEmbroideryLong SleeveForward\nCrochet DressesCatalogCrochetingMagic BoxCrochet DesignsCrochet ArtGranny SquaresHandicraftSearchingAccessoriesBikiniTissuesCooking RecipesSkirtCrochetTulipaForward\nCrochet ShortsCrochet ShawlCrochet PatternsDress SkirtFree PatternCrochetingSwimwearHandicraftsSkirtsTricForward\nPretty and lacy.


crusher machine ¨k\nUK Enerpat (Unshark) MSW Shredder - Municipal Solid Waste Shredder. Find this Pin and more on Shredder, Crusher, Grinder Machine by Dacy Recycling. …\nwood log crusher machine, small wood crusher\nWood log crusher machine, small wood crusher,\nShredding Machine Crushing: STRETCH ARMSTRONG TOY ...\n· Shredding Machine Crushing: STRETCH ARMSTRONG TOY Destruction🔴 SUBSCRIBE: https://goo.gl/F9x4NU 🔴 INSTAGRAM: https://goo.gl/rb3bxh 🔴 FACEBOOK: https://go...\nKeywords: Crusher machine, plastic bottles, hopper, tools, electric motor 1.0 INTRODUCTION Recycling is the process of treating waste materials to produce new products. Recycling reduces waste, reduces consumption of new raw materials, reduce energy usage, reduce air pollution (from ...\nelectrical of courses for beginners pdf\nWhat role promotes the breaking of hard rock\n01mining mobile rock crusher\ncore crushing indiamart\ncrushing pulverizing ££\nflow chart of mineral processing plant\nScg1160 cone crusher\nbuyers crusher crushing plants in kerala in rome


Restaurant Server/Weekend Bartender in Deerfield, Illinois | Careers at Chicago Marriott Suites Deerfield\nRestaurant Server/Weekend Bartender\nPosted Date 2 months ago(1/11/2019 3:01 PM)\nWe're looking for a capable Restaurant Server/Bartender who will welcome and serve customers, take and deliver orders with a friendly can-do" attitude. Also, to prepare beverages for other servers to supply to guests, and act as cashier for the lounge.\nThe Restaurant Server maintains a clean work area and makes sure all supplies are stocked and carries out all duties in accordance with the high quality standards of Pyramid Hotel Group. This position will also include weekend (Friday & Saturday) bartending duties.\nAbility to work flexible days to include weekends and holidays.\nFood Safety Certification or ability to obtain within 90-days\nTIPS Alcohol Certification or ability to obtain within 90-days.


Loti Nei Kina Wikselkoers\nLoti Nei Kina wikselkoers hjoed. Loti wearde yn Kina hjoed.\nLoti Nei Kina wikselkoers hjoed\n1 loti (LSL) is lyk oan 0.22 Kina (PGK)\n1 Kina (PGK) is lyk oan 4.46 loti (LSL)\nDe kosten fan loti yn Kina hjoed, de echte wikselkoers. De wikselkoers fan Loti nei Kina komt ien kear deis foar. Ynformaasje oer de wikselkoers út iepen boarnen. De wikselkoers foar loti nei Kina is de basis foar banken en har hjoeddeistige wikselkoersen.\n1 loti is no gelyk oan 0.22 Kina. De offisjele wikselkoers fan 'e Bank of Europe. 1 loti is djoerder wurden troch 0.002377 Kina hjoed yn 'e Bank of Europe. Loti wikselkoers giet op tsjin Kina neffens Jeropa. De kosten fan 1 loti hjoed binne gelyk oan 0.22 Kina, as de Jeropeeske bank fan 'e lân oprjochte.\nConvert Loti Nei Kina Loti Nei Kina live op Forex exchange market Loti Nei Kina wikselkoers skiednis\nLoti Nei Kina Wikselkoers hjoed by 27 Juny 2022\nYn 'e tabel oer de útwikseling fan Loti nei Kina is it handich om te sjen Loti wikselkoersen foar ferskate dagen. Fergelykje wikselkoersen foar hjoed, juster en lêste dagen om de koers fan groei as fal fan 'e selekteare munt te bepalen. It is wichtich om net allinich de wikselkoers foar hjoed te sjen, mar ek de tariven foar juster en de dei derfoar. Dit sil helpe om de wikselkoers fan Loti oant Kina foar moarn te foarsizzen.\n27.06.2022 0.224163 0.002377 ↑\n26.06.2022 0.221786 -\n25.06.2022 0.221786 -0.001343 ↓\n24.06.2022 0.223129 0.002994 ↑\n23.06.2022 0.220135 -0.001224 ↓\nDe priis fan 10 loti tsjin de wikselkoers is 2.24 Kina. De priis fan 50 loti tsjin de wikselkoers is 11.21 Kina. 22.42 Kina de kosten fan 100 loti at de hjoeddeistige wikselkoers. De kosten fan 250 loti oant Kina binne no gelyk oan 56.04. 1 loti is hjoed gelyk oan 0.22 Kina neffens wikselkoers fan 'e nasjonale bank. 1 loti rose mei 0.002377 Kina hjoed neffens wikselkoers fan 'e haadbank fan it lân.\n2.24 PGK 11.21 PGK 22.42 PGK 56.04 PGK 112.08 PGK 224.16 PGK 560.41 PGK 1 120.81 PGK\nDe kosten fan 1 Kina yn loti binne no gelyk oan 1. 22.31 loti hjoed kost 5 PGK by de útwikseling taryf. De priis fan 10 Kina tsjin de wikselkoers is 44.61 loti. De kosten fan 25 Kina yn loti binne no gelyk oan 25. Loti wikselkoers is hjoed omheech tsjin Kina. Hjoed kostet 1 loti 0.22 Kina yn 'e nasjonale bank fan it lân.\n4.46 LSL 22.31 LSL 44.61 LSL 111.53 LSL 223.05 LSL 446.10 LSL 1 115.26 LSL 2 230.52 LSL


6755 Merriman Road 103, Garden City - MLS 215089231\n6755 MERRIMAN Road103 Garden City, MI 48135\nFor Lease $1,120 Mortgage Calculator\nMLS® ID: 215089231\n6755 MERRIMAN Road 103, Garden City, MI 48135\nTo: 6755 Merriman Road 103, Garden City, MI\n6755 MERRIMAN Road - FOR LEASE!!! GROSS LEASE(LAND LORD PAYS FOR TAXES AND INSURANCE), TENANT RESPONSIBLE FOR CAM(COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE, LIGHT, WATER, GAS, LAWN, SNOW REMOVAL AND PARKING MAINTENANCE. HUGE FREE STANDING CORNER COMMERCIAL BUILDING, BUILT IN 1985,OUSTANDING PROFESSIONAL QUALITY CLASS B, FREE STANDING CORNER COMMERCIAL BUILDING, GREAT SIGNAGE AND VISIBILITY WITH TWO EASY ACCESS FROM MAIN ROAD, COULD BE USED FOR RETAIL, LAWYER OFFICE, MORTGAGE, ETC. UNIT 103 HAS LARGE RECEPTION AREA, WAITING AREA, LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, 6 OFFICES. LOTS OF PARKING, NEWER CENTRAL AIR, GREAT LOCATION MERRIMAN BETWEEN FORD RD AND WARREN, MULTIPLE BATHROOMS, DATA APX Listing information\nTotal Square Footage: 1,200 ($0.93 per sq. foot)\nAssessment - None Known, Current Use - Office, Medical,Service,Retail, Inventory Included YN - 0, Inventory List YN - 0, Legal Rental Certified YN - 1, Number Of Units Total - 1, Operating Expense - 9999999.00, Restrictions YN - 1, Sqft Office - 1200, Tax Amount Summer - 1.0000, Tax Amount Winter - 1.0000\n108 Listings For Sale $111,564 Average Listing Price $95 Average Listing Price per Square Foot Not the home you're looking for?


About Numbers Entertainment\n19-02-14 Intento de pago fraude desde CA con tarjeta de MT. Shopper IP: 192.99.5.97. Shopper e-mail: **************@gmail.com ---------------- Fjgfth vdgnb vfdhhh gdfhg vgcghj ccfhb Zgfdggfh vchjgb vvhkhv gsdhbv vvbb Hutyjhxx vffbhg vjbxgnb vvvfdhvxgh Rhdtjgdjhdh vcghfg hhgkhfhj Dnhdghdghgd vcvfdnjfhncjd cchddhgsgn ffbbfhkgdthb


Men Suits And Blazers : Zen Cart!, The Art of E-commerce\nAnna Kosturova Seashore Angel Monokini - One-Piece Swimsuits - Women Anna Kosturova One-Piece Swimsuits online 47202357AQ qlU0UYpL\nPaco Rabanne Blazer - Women Paco Rabanne Blazers online 41742565EB lg96jxAj\nVersus Versace Sweatshirt - Women Versus Versace Sweatshirts online 12090646IF NVo4rEKd\nJets By Jessika Allen Bikini - Women Jets By Jessika Allen Bikinis online 47204127PO KdbOQXDv\n26.7 Twentysixseven Blazer - Men 26.7 Twentysixseven Blazers online 49323225RN 94uXcULO\nAdd Blazer - Men Add Blazers online 49317112KI DqUrdjKb\nAglini Suits - Men Aglini Suit online 49294068BX duPLq2PN\nAltea Blazer - Men Altea Blazers online 49317977TU egKIT4Tv\nAmi Alexandre Mattiussi Blazer - Men Ami Alexandre Mattiussi Blazers online 49315522JT okIIja8A\nAnn Demeulemeester Blazer - Men Ann Demeulemeester Blazers online 49302264IB oWtJrWRx\nAntony Morato Blazer - Men Antony Morato Blazers online 49317176FW wVYbpk06\nArmani Collezioni Blazer - Men Armani Collezioni Blazers online 49316660KP cO9etdr5\nNew Products For April - Men Suits And Blazers\nDrumohr Blazer - Men Drumohr Blazers online 49321178UB 69DjRI4o\nCantarelli Blazer - Men Cantarelli Blazers online 49322011EJ us2cCSfL\nHamaki-Ho Blazer - Men Hamaki-Ho Blazers online 49286295MO N1VdbASS\nStilosophy Industry Blazer - Men Stilosophy Industry Blazers online 49286306EA xi4qKX1H\nMessagerie Suits - Men Messagerie Suit online 49320780WL a1kdT8MV\nNeill Katter Blazer - Men Neill Katter Blazers online 49321855UG y4nQnG8H\nHamaki-Ho Vest - Men Hamaki-Ho Vests online 49286424SP W6pFM23Z\nGrasil Blazer - Men Grasil Blazers online 41711545BW 11enrcvu\nChristian Pellizzari Blazer - Men Christian Pellizzari Blazers online 49321819MN 24kxVvMe\nOfficina 36 Blazer - Men Officina 36 Blazers online 49286206DD rBrKzCx8\nScuderi Suits - Men Scuderi Suit online 49320863HL EXweUZyG\nBagnoli Sartoria Napoli Blazer - Men Bagnoli Sartoria Napoli Blazers online 49265184HH M8nCOK3v\nL.B.M. 1911 Blazer - Men L.B.M. 1911 Blazers online 49312494QN v0hZ1YrS\nLuigi Bianchi Mantova Suits - Men Luigi Bianchi Mantova Suit online 49315084CX bOEO5isD\nScuderi Blazer - Men Scuderi Blazers online 49320762EX 7hl8q2th\nBarena Blazer - Men Barena Blazers online 49321171CS PZtr9Ouc\nAthletic Vintage Blazer - Men Athletic Vintage Blazers online 49320668FH 7BvHiIOB\nGrey Daniele Alessandrini Blazer - Men Grey Daniele Alessandrini Blazers online 49313882QB r49Tqyjn\nScuderi Blazer - Men Scuderi Blazers online 49320766QG XT7z04gn\nHenry Cotton's Blazer - Men Henry Cotton's Blazers online 49314608SB aucjZRS5


Mad Men 2012: Season 5 – Watch Movie and TV Show PubFilm HD Free\nHome » New Series » Mad Men 2012: Season 5\nMad Men 2012: Season 5 (13/13)\n[contact-form-7 id="9138" title="Report us !"] 2012 DRAMA NEW ADDED SERIES\t2016-11-27\nTags 2012 DRAMA NEW ADDED SERIES\nSearch: Watch movie online Mad Men 2012: Season 5 HD free, Englishsub, Subenglish,English Sub,Sub English, Mad Men 2012: Season 5 Watching Full episode HD movies, HD Online,HD Tivishow Online HD ,eztv ,yify , juggs, killers, lol, nezu, dvd, xvid, HDTV x264, 480p, 720p, 1080p, Full HD, BD-9, BD-25, BD-50, Blu-ray, DVD-9, Trailer, Trailers, Watch, Download Mad Men 2012: Season 5 for Mobile, Android, Ios, Galaxy, Windowphone, Watch Mad Men 2012: Season 5 illustrate, Watch Mad Men 2012: Season 5 voice, Watch Mad Men 2012: Season 5 HD, Watch Online, Watch Movies, HDrip, BDrip, HD Rip, Rip BD, IMDb, Stream, Blu-ray Disc, Blu-ray, Movies HK, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Top Movies, Top 250, Top250, Top250 IMDb, Subtitle,English Language, Insert Noise, Trailer HD, HD Trailers, HD Trailer, HD Trailers, Watch Mad Men 2012: Season 5 Imdb, Watch Mad Men 2012: Season 5 Youtube.com, Picasa, Vimeo, Googledrive, megashare, video-one.com, xvideos, Download film, torrent, movies, tv shows, series Mad Men 2012: Season 5 Mediafire.com, thepiratebay.se, onedrive.com, Mega, 4share, mega.co.nz high speed. , Watch, Download Mad Men 2012: Season 5 Season 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Final, Episode 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 final at pid tv, pidtv, pidtv com.


Story of a Life | Series | LibraryThing\nCommon KnowledgeSeriesStory of a Life\nSeries: Story of a Life\nThe Story of a Life by Konstantin Paustovsky Omnibus\nStory of a Life: Childhood and Schooldays by Konstantin Paustovskij 1\nStory of a Life: Slow Approach to Thunder by Konstantin Paustovskij 2\nStory of a Life: In That Dawn by Konstantin Paustovskij 3\nStory of a Life: Years of Hope by Konstantin Paustovskij 4\nStory of a Life: Southern Adventure by Konstantin Paustovskij 5\n1st half 20th century(4) 20th century(18) Arbeiderspers(5) Autobiografische literatuur(9) autobiographical(6) autobiography(79) biography(16) casette(4) Dutch(4) Europe(5) fiction(7) history(24) literature(28) man(5) memoir(31) memories(4) ncp(5) non-fiction(15) novel(4) p200-299(4) Paustovskij(5) Paustovskij Konstantin(5) Privé-domein(67) read(7) Read in Dutch(5) read twice(5) Russia(81) Russian(28) Russian literature(55) Russian Revolution(5) Russische schrijver(5) Soviet(4) soviet memoirs(5) Soviet Union(12) Top 500(5) Translated by Wim Hartog(5) travel(7) Ukraine(4) wishlist(4) zeitgeist(5)\nBoek der omzwervingen by Konstantin Paustovskij (1965)\nThe Golden Rose: Literature in the Making by Konstantin Paustovskij (1968)\nFeiten en gedachten : memoires. : 1812-1838 by Alexander I. Herzen\nFeiten en gedachten : memoires. Derde boek: 1847-1852 by Alexander I. Herzen\nDe romantici by Konstantin Paustovskij (1984)\nLeaves from a Russian diary by Pitirim Sorokin (1950)\nIk ben nooit onverschillig geweest by Ilja Ehrenburg (1998)\nIk ben geboren by Georges Perec (2003)\nSame series: Hope Abandoned (Memoirs)


Aldeberkeap wurdt Olympysk | Omrop Fryslân (advertinsje)\nAldeberkeap wurdt Olympysk 05 aug 2008 - 20:59\n0 reaksjes De Olympyske ringen yn Aldeberkeap\nAldeberkeap makket him op foar de Olympyske_Spelen. Twa Aldeberkeapsters dogge nammentlik mei oan de Olympyske_Spelen. Wim_Stroetinga as baanhurdfytser en Sjoerd_Hamburger as roeier. Foar sa´n lyts doarp dochs spesjaal en dêrom hawwe Pleatslik Belang en de ûndernimmersferieniging in keunstwurk makke. Op it eveneminteterrein Doevenkaamp wurde tongersdeitejûn Olympyske ringen ûntbleate fan 22 meter grut.\nKorreksje meldeLês foarTrefwurden: argyfView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 05-08Drokke dei foar strânwachten 05-08Beamstamkano op de Waadsee Besjoch ek...


10 Best Hotels Near Robin Hood Land - TripAdvisor\n4-star Hotels in Donnersbach\nHotels near Ski Planneralm\nTravel feed: Donnersbach\nBest Hotels Near Robin Hood Land, Donnersbach\nPlanneralm 26, Donnersbach 8953, Austria\nRead Reviews of Robin Hood Land\n518 of 3,598 properties match your filters. Clear all filters\nFilterAny distance from Robin Hood Land\n25.6 km from Robin Hood Land\n30.7 km from Robin Hood Land\n36.8 km from Robin Hood Land\n31.0 km from Robin Hood Land\n38.1 km from Robin Hood Land\n0.0 km from Robin Hood Land\n6.8 km from Robin Hood Land\n6.7 km from Robin Hood Land\n12.5 km from Robin Hood Land\n18.1 km from Robin Hood Land\n18.8 km from Robin Hood Land\n“There are few choices in Liezen for accommodations, so you have to bear in mind that this is practically the only game in town. The hotel is as pictured from the outside, although the inside comes across as...”\n19.7 km from Robin Hood Land\n20.6 km from Robin Hood Land\n20.8 km from Robin Hood Land\n22.2 km from Robin Hood Land\n22.4 km from Robin Hood Land\n22.9 km from Robin Hood Land\n23.2 km from Robin Hood Land\n23.0 km from Robin Hood Land\n24.9 km from Robin Hood Land\n25.7 km from Robin Hood Land\n25.8 km from Robin Hood Land\n26.2 km from Robin Hood Land\n27.3 km from Robin Hood Land\n26.6 km from Robin Hood Land\n27.7 km from Robin Hood Land\n27.5 km from Robin Hood Land\n29.9 km from Robin Hood Land


Brushless Motor Power Tools 350w Mini Electric Sander\n » Polisher » Elektryske Sander\nElektryske Sander, Polisher best electric sanders, electric orbital sanders, sanders, sanding maching\nGewicht： 1 kg\nRated Power ：350W\nYnput Voltage ：230V\nFariabele snelheid ：4,000-10,000 rpm\nOrbit ：3/16" (5.0mm)\nGrutte fan Backing Pad：\nLûdnivo ：71 dB(IN)\nKleur ：Oranje, read\nPlug ：MY(220~240V), ÚS(110~120V)\nThe best sander supplier in China!\nDe ANSI J05101 borstellose Sander leveret snelle ferwidering en in goed mingd, ultra-glad finish, sadat houtwurkers en finishtimmermannen fluch en nei strange noarmen kinne sânje. elektryske sander is designed to eliminate swirl marks on the workpiece.\nDêrneist, de backing pad is pliable te soargjen in glêd, fyn finish op sawol platte as kontoeren oerflakken. Mei in noflike soft-grip top en lichemsûntwerp, dit ark hat fariabele-snelheid kontrôle fan tusken 4,000 en 10,000 RPM om de snelheid oan 'e taak te passen. It omfettet ek in systeem oan board foar it filterjen fan fyn stof.


it nije fleksplan fan mobyl - besparje tonnen mei dielde gegevensplannen!\nMain Nijs & Resinsjes Ting Mobile's nije Flex-plan - besparje tonnen mei dielde gegevensplannen!\nTing Mobile's nije Flex-plan - besparje tonnen mei dielde gegevensplannen!\nAdvertinsje troch Ting Mobile: de mieningen útdrukt yn dit ferhaal reflektearje miskien net de posysjes fan PhoneArena! disclaimer\nIt finen fan it perfekte mobylplan foar famylje hat altyd in drege nut west om te kraken. Faker as net, sille jo gigabytes op 'e tafel litte, mear betelje dan nedich, krekt sadat de line fan elkenien genôch gegevens hat. It alternatyf is lytsere plannen te krijen en dan einigje te beteljen foar ekstra gigabyte of de lêste wike fan 'e moanne trochbringe sûnder gegevens te brûken.\nTing Mobyls & nijste & Flex & rdquo; plan komt yn om dit bepaalde pinepunt op in heul klantfreonlike manier oan te pakken. Hjir is de basis fan it:\nFoegje safolle rigels op jo akkount ta as jo nedich binne, gewoan $ 10 per rigel\nElke rigel hat unbeheinde teksten en oproppen\nElke line dielt deselde pool fan gegevens (LTE en 5G)\nBetelje $ 5 per GB gegevens nedich\nBesykje Ting Mobile no!\nFolgje ús link en easkje $ 25 servicekredyt\nDat, jo betelje allinich yn stappen foar de hoemannichte gegevens dy't jo nedich binne. As de iene persoan op it akkount net safolle gegevens brûkt, mar de oare docht - de dielde gigabytes soargje derfoar dat se noch wurde ferdield en brûkt, en jo sille jo jild wis wurdich krije.\nHjir is in rap foarbyld - jo hawwe twa rigels op ien akkount. De iene persoan hat dizze moanne 3 GB gegevens nedich, de oare is net in soad fan in ynternetsurfer. Yn totaal wurde jo foar dy moanne $ 10 per rigel yn rekken brocht en in ekstra $ 15 foar de gegevens. Dat is yn totaal $ 35.\nAs jo in fêste gegevensbrûker binne, kinne jo mear ynteressearje yn oare plannen fan Ting Mobile - lykas Set 5, dy't jo 5 GB LTE / 5G en unbeheinde oproppen en teksten foar $ 25 per moanne jout. Of gean mei Unbeheind foar 22 GB LTE / 5G en unbeheinde oproppen, teksten en gegevens mei lege snelheid (as jo ea 22 GB ferbaarne) foar $ 45.\nWat is Ting Mobile?\nTing Mobile is in Mobile Virtual Network Operator (MVNO) dy't al 9 jier bestiet en noch altyd sterk giet. It biedt ferbining oer sawol GSM- as CDMA-netwurken, wat betsjuttet dat d'r in heule goede kâns is dat jo jo eigen apparaat kinne bringe, en al klear binne om te gean.\nSyn plannen fereaskje gjin kontrakten - jo betelje moanliks en dat is it. Gjin snaren taheakke.\nNoch makket Ting Mobile genôch oer klanttefredenheid om echte minsklike klanteservice te leverjen, yn plak fan in robot mei foarôf selekteare antwurden.\nIs dekking fan Ting Mobile goed? No, om't it bedriuw sawol de netwurken fan Verizon as T-Mobile & rsquo brûkt, kinne jo der wis fan wêze dat it dekking fan hege kwaliteit biedt oer de Feriene Steaten.\nWat is in MVNO?\nIn Mobile Virtual Network Operator leveret triedleaze tsjinsten sûnder in eigen draadleaze ynfrastruktuer te hawwen. Ynstee giet it saaklike gearwurkingsferbannen yn mei operators dy't har eigen ynfrastruktuer hawwe en tagong hiere ta har tsjinsten.\nIn MVNO is frij om har eigen prizen yn te stellen, dêrom kin Ting Mobile har eigen plannen oanbiede, wylst jo noch tagong jouwe ta T-Mo's en Verizon's robúste netwurken.\nandroid marshmallow galaxy noat 4\niphone 12 pro max opladen snelheid\nOtterbox Commuter Series Case foar Apple iPhone 6 Plus Review\nVerizon foeget nije 5G en unbeheinde plannen foar ferbûne apparaten ta\nHoe kinne jo foto's en fideo's stjoere fan in iPhone nei in Android-tillefoan?\nTidal outshines Apple Music en Spotify mei útwreide studintekoarten\n10 fan 'e bêste QWERTY-smartphones fan doe't hardware-toetseboerds cool wiene\nAT&T en Verizon wurde ûnwierskynlik bûnsgenoaten yn 'e 5G-oarloch tsjin T-Mobile\nKik is in messaging-app mei bots dy't jo grappige fideo's en styl suggestjes jouwe\nWikselje fan iPhone nei Android: tips en trúks dy't jo moatte wite\nHoe kopiearje / plakke op in iPhone\nApple Watch Series 6 vs Series 5: Wat binne de ferskillen


Sloop driget foar Prins Willim | Omrop Fryslân\nSloop driget foar Prins Willim\n07 apr 2014 - 13:21\nDe Prins Willim yn 2013 - Foto: Remco de Vries\nDe Prins Willim gie yn 2009 yn flammen op - Foto: ANP\nDe kâns is grut dat de replika fan it âlde VOC-skip Prins Willim dochs noch sloopt wurdt. Neffens eigener Jelle Talsma binne der op dit stuit net genôch partijen om it skip te renovearjen. It skip baarnde yn 2009 folslein ôf, nei alle gedachten troch koartsluting.\nTalsma kocht mei syn skipswerfbedriuw út Frjentsjer it kasko, om de Prins Willim wer op te bouwen. Mar dat giet, sa't it no liket, net troch. Der binne noch wol ûnderhannelings geande mei ferskate partijen, mar der is net folle hoop dat it noch slagget.\nFerline wike is it skip op lêst fan de gemeente út de haven fan Harns sleept. De Prins Willim leit no by in skipssloperij yn Kampen, wachtsjend op it definitive fonnis. De kosten fan de renovaasje wurde rûsd op 10 miljoen euro.\nFrjentsjer Jelle Talsma VOC-skip Prins Willim\nWedstriid folksferhaal skriuwe\n'Seegat Lauwerseach te ûndjip'


seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels - Best China Steel\nHome > Ship Steel > seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels\nKatalor have seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels suppliers and manufacturer ,if you need seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels price and specification ,please contact us.\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Top Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe Manufacturer and Supplier\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe Supplier in Nigeria | Superior ...\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe Manufacturer and Supplier ...\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels ASTM A106 Carbon Steel Pipe - steels-supplier.com\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Videos of seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels\nVimeo · 3/17/2016 · 13 views\nSee more videos of seamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels carbon steel galvanized pipe supplier in India |seamless ...\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe - dir.indiamart.com\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Carbon Seamless Steel Pipe and Welded Steel Pipe, CS Pipe\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Seamless Steel Pipe - ansonsteels.com\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe Chart - reliantpipes.com\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe - Manufacturers, Suppliers ...\nCarbon Steel Seamless Pipe The Carbon Steel Seamless Pipe is manufactured by our company with superior alloy pipe that is made from the combination of steel and carbon. Further, the pipe …\nseamless carbon steel pipe supplier steels Related searches for seamless carbon steel pipe supplier st…


Ekstra ryksjild foar twa Fryske lokale omroppen om profesjoneler te wurden | Omrop Fryslân\nEkstra ryksjild foar twa Fryske lokale omroppen om profesjoneler te wurden\n20 des 2019 - 11:13\nTwa Fryske lokale omroppen dogge takom jier mei oan in lanlike proef om te ûndersykjen hoe't se profesjoneler wurde kinne. It giet om RTV NOF yn De Westereen, de streekomrop foar Noardeast-Fryslân en Dantumadiel, en de Ljouwerter omrop LEO Middelsé. Se krije dêrom ekstra jild fan it Ryk.\nYn it hiele lân dogge tweintich omroppen mei oan de pilot. Mei-inoar krije se 2,85 miljoen euro fan it Ryk, boppe-op de fêste subsydzje dy't de omroppen krije fan harren gemeente. LEO Middelsé krijt 110.000 euro en RTV NOF krekt wat minder, nammentlik 107.205 euro, sa hat it Stimuleringsfonds voor de Journalistiek bekend makke.\nDe lokale omroppen draaie op frijwilligers. By RTV NOF binne der goed 100 frijwilligers aktyf en by LEO Middelsé sa'n 75. It ekstra ryksjild kin ynset wurde foar it oanlûken fan begelieding fan dy frijwilligers en it sterker meitsjen fan de sjoernalistike kwaliteit.\nDe proef set útein yn maart en duorret in jier. Mei de tydlike regeling fan it fûns jout it kabinet gehoar oan in oprop fan de Twadde Keamer om de lokale omropsektor de kommende jierren te fersterkjen.\nHedzer Kok, bedriuwslieder fan omrop LEO Middelsé\nsubsydzje RTV NOF lokale omrop LEO Middelsé profesjonaliteit\nWeromkommen fan Roazebosk op De Jouwer wer in stap tichterby\nNije spits foar SC Hearrenfean: Runar Espejord


1920x1200 Coffee Art, Owl, 4 K Wallpapers, Coffee Art Owl 4k Wallpapers and Pictures, Photos, Posters 95179\nHD wallpapers Coffee Art, Owl, 4 K Wallpapers, Coffee Art Owl 4k 1920 x 1200 desktop hd wallpaper download\n1920x1200 Coffee Art, Owl, 4 K Wallpapers, Coffee Art Owl 4k wallpapers download with number 95179 for your monitor screen, smartphone, tablet or any other device.\nHere you will find the best quality and beautiful HD wallpapers for Desktop, Mobile Phones, Iphones, Htc, Samsung Galaxy, Nexus, Nokia, Sony, . These pictures, photos, posters, art prints and wallpapers in high quality, with a resolution 1920 on 1200. These desktop wallpapers on the theme: Coffee Art, Owl, 4 K Wallpapers, Coffee Art Owl 4k.


Stipepunt 0-25 bliuwt iepen | Omrop Fryslân (advertinsje)\nStipepunt 0-25 bliuwt iepen 18 des 2003 - 00:00\nIt stipepunt 0-25 dat advys en stipe jout oan bern, jongerein en âlden oer jeugdsaken, opfieding en regeljouwing, bliuwt wis noch twa jier iepen. Op oantrunen fan de provinsje hat de gemeente Achtkarspelen noch wer twa jier subsydzje útlutsen foar it projekt.\nFia in kantoar, in website, e-mail of telefoan is it stipepunt berikber. 0-25 wie sa'n sukses dat de personiele besetting útwreide wurde sil nei 44 oeren.\nKorreksje meldeTrefwurden: argyfLês foarView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 18-12Frou út Snits fermist 18-12Subsydzje taal en kultuer rêden Besjoch ek...


1280x800 Windows 10, Windows 10 Background, Wallpaper Windows 10, Windows 10 Wallpapers Art Wallpapers and Pictures, Photos, Posters 86590\nHD wallpapers Windows 10, Windows 10 Background, Wallpaper Windows 10, Windows 10 Wallpapers Art 1280 x 800 desktop hd wallpaper download\n1280x800 Windows 10, Windows 10 Background, Wallpaper Windows 10, Windows 10 Wallpapers Art wallpapers download with number 86590 for your monitor screen, smartphone, tablet or any other device.\nHere you will find the best quality and beautiful HD wallpapers for Desktop, Mobile Phones, Iphones, Htc, Samsung Galaxy, Nexus, Nokia, Sony, . These pictures, photos, posters, art prints and wallpapers in high quality, with a resolution 1280 on 800. These desktop wallpapers on the theme: Windows 10, Windows 10 Background, Wallpaper Windows 10, Windows 10 Wallpapers Art.


Moody GRE Tutoring - Find GRE Tutors in Moody, AL\nResults 1-14 of 18 for gre tutor moody\nGre Tutors in Moody, AL\nFind Private & Affordable GRE Tutoring in the Moody Area!\nCrawford K. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nJose R. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nDonna K. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nAdam F. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nChase F. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nKelsey P. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nCraig L. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nS.M. Mehedee P. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nJit C. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nArunbabu S. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nRick W. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nIbukunoluwa A. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nElizabeth T. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL\nLinda H. Private GRE tutor in Moody, AL


Authentic Sears Ceiling Fans SMC Emperor Fan 1080p60 Remake YouTube Smc Dc42 | Losethek sears outdoor ceiling fans. sears.ca ceiling fans. sears ceiling fans remote control.\nHome » Home Design » Sears Ceiling Fans » Authentic Sears Ceiling Fans SMC Emperor Fan 1080p60 Remake YouTube Smc Dc42\nRelated Tags: #sears outdoor ceiling fans #sears.ca ceiling fans #sears ceiling fans remote control #sears ceiling fans clearance #sears ceiling fans #ceiling fans at sears #sears ceiling fans canada #sears ceiling fans prices #sears white ceiling fans #sears ceiling fans with lights hunter


Calle Jarnkrok#194GOALS AGAINST AVERAGE\nCarter Hutton#300.00VS. PIT SPLITSSplitsSeasonLocationvs.By MonthLeagueSeason HalfRestTotalHomeAwayAtlantic DivisionBoston BruinsBuffalo SabresDetroit Red WingsFlorida PanthersMontreal CanadiensOttawa SenatorsTampa Bay LightningToronto Maple LeafsMetropolitan DivisionCarolina HurricanesColumbus Blue JacketsNew Jersey DevilsNew York IslandersNew York RangersPhiladelphia FlyersPittsburgh PenguinsWashington CapitalsCentral DivisionChicago BlackhawksColorado AvalancheDallas StarsMinnesota WildNashville PredatorsSt. Louis BluesWinnipeg JetsPacific DivisionAnaheim DucksArizona CoyotesCalgary FlamesEdmonton OilersLos Angeles KingsSan Jose SharksVancouver CanucksSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecemberJanuaryFebruaryMarchAprilMayEastern ConferenceWestern ConferenceAtlantic DivisionMetropolitan DivisionCentral DivisionPacific DivisionPre All-StarPost All-Star0 Days Rest1 Days Rest2 Days Rest3+ Days RestRegular | ExpandedTEAM STATISTICS SHOOTOUTSPLAYERGPGAPTS+/-PIMSHIFTGWGFOWFOLFO%PRODATTGPCTShea Weber, D 201110610000.049:06000.0Eric Nystrom, LW21011238010100.029:04000.0Taylor Beck, LW201112390000.025:33000.0Roman Josi, D 211220601000.025:08000.0Mike Fisher, C 11010021071138.88915:43000.0Filip Forsberg, C 202210380000.015:27000.0Gabriel Bourque, LW110110160000.011:44000.0James Neal, LW20000239010100.00:00000.0Ryan Ellis, D 1000-10240000.00:00000.0Olli Jokinen, C †1000022403730.00:00000.0Mike Ribeiro, C 20001041091439.130:00000.0Paul Gaustad, C 20001038014960.870:00000.0Anton Volchenkov, D 200002350000.00:00000.0Derek Roy, C †1000-102201516.6670:00000.0Viktor Stalberg, LW100000130000.00:00000.0Colin Wilson, C 2000-1038020100.00:00000.0Victor Bartley, D 100010180000.00:00000.0Calle Jarnkrok, C 2000144103350.00:00000.0Mattias Ekholm, D 200000480000.00:00000.0Craig Smith, C 20000039010100.00:00000.0Seth Jones, D 200010470000.00:00000.0Matt Cullen, C 100010170000.00:00000.0† Midseason Trades: Olli Jokinen (8 games STL, 6 games TOR); Derek Roy (46 games EDM)GlossaryGP: Games playedG: GoalsA: AssistsPTS: Points+/-: Plus/MinusPIM: Penalty minutesSHIFT: ShiftsGWG: Game winning goalsFOW: Faceoffs wonFOL: Faceoffs lostFO%: Faceoff percentagePROD: Production timeATT: Shootout attemptsG: Shootout goalsPCT: Shootout percentageGOALIE STATISTICS SHOOTOUTSPLAYERGPGAATOISVSV%SHOTGATSAPIMSASVSVPCTCarter Hutton10.0059:45211.0001021000.000Pekka Rinne13.0060:0023.8850326000.000GlossaryGP: Games playedGAA: Goals against avgTOI: Time on iceSV: SavesSV%: Save percentageSHO: ShutoutsTGA: Total goals againstTSA: Total shots againstPIM: Penalty minutesSA: Shootout shots againstSV: Shootout savesSVPCT: Shootout save percentage


2" BDS-SC Baader Diamond Steeltrack Focuser35\n2" BDS-RT Baader Diamond Steeltrack Focuser35\n2" BDS-NT Baader Diamond Steeltrack Focuser35\n11/9/2017 6:57 PM Baader 2" ClickLock eyepiece clamps\nThank you for your earlier reply to my question regarding the Baader 2 in Clicklock Clamp S 58 for the Steeltrack Diamond Focuser product ref: #2956258.\nI have a further query to which I would be most grateful if you could provide an answer:-\nBy how much will it increase to height of the Steeltrack Focuser (i.e. reduce the amount of in focus) when fitted in place of the standard 2 in clamp which came with the focuser


Syktocht nei fermiste famke by It Amelân nei twa dagen noch altyd sûnder resultaat - Omrop Fryslân\n13 july 2020, 17:42 • 2 minuten lêstiid\nDe syktocht nei it fermiste famke yn de Noardsee boppe It Amelân is nei twa dagen noch altyd sûnder resultaat. Ek de help fan garnalefiskers, dy't sûnt moandeitemoarn sochten, bate net. De fiskers ha harren syktocht yntusken stillein.\nFIDEO: Syktocht nei fermiste famke by It Amelân noch sûnder resultaat\nDe garnalefiskers hiene in protte lêst fan de dining en koene fanwegen de feiligens net te ticht by de kust farre. "Dan bringe se harren eigen libben yn gefaar", seit ferslachjouwer Willem Vermeltfoort. "Derom is no it beslút naam om op te hâlden mei de syktocht."\nDe plysje siket noch wol hieltyd nei it famke. Ek de rest fan de dei wurdt der noch socht. As it famke by it tsjuster noch net fûn is, wurdt der tiisdei in nij beslút naam oer de syktocht.\nNettsjinsteande de syktocht sitte der in soad toeristen gewoan op it strân fan It Amelân. "Het is schrikken. Heel confronterend, want het komt heel dichtbij. Ik heb zelf ook kinderen die hier de zee in gaan. Je kan dan alleen maar denken aan die ouders en hoe afschuwelijk het moet zijn om je kind kwijt te zijn", seit ien fan de toeristen.\nIn oare toerist doart troch de fermissing eins net mear te fier de see yn. "Ik ga niet heel prettig de zee in. Ik durf niet te ver de zee in, voor het geval ik toch iets tegenkom", seit sy.\nFerslachjouwer Willem Vermeltfoort op It Amelân\nTrije aksjefierders wurde fertocht fan besykjen ta deaslach by protest op A32\nLIVEBLOG: Aksjefierders by plysjeburo | Steatereis skrast om feiligens


Plysje lit Fryske fertochten yn drugslab-saak foarearst frij | Omrop Fryslân\n06 apr 2018 - 12:43\nDe plysje yn Fryslân wurket yn de saak gear mei plysje East-Brabân. By de grutskalige aksje nei drugskriminaliteit waarden woansdei ek ynfallen dien yn Den Bosch, Oirschot en Rosmalen. Yn Aldebiltsyl en Nieuw-Amsterdam yn Drinte waard in drugslab oantroffen. Yn beide labs waarden inkelde tûzenen liters oan gemikaliën fûn.


1928 & Anywears & Candle Warmers, Etc. & Jean-Paul Germain & Lancome & Poppy & Fritz | Boscov's\n1928 & Anywears & Candle Warmers, Etc. & Jean-Paul Germain & Lancome & Poppy & Fritz


folk art quilts – Writing. Art. History.\nTag: folk art quilts