Global Desiccators Market Research Report 2021 - RnR Market Research\nDesiccators Market Status and Trend Analysis 2017-2026 (COVID-19 Version)\nDesiccators Market Insights 2019, Global and Chinese Analysis and Forecast to 2024\nGlobal Desiccators Market Research Report 2020\nGlobal Desiccators Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2025\nGlobal Desiccators Market Research Report 2021\n- Gas Purge\n- Electronics & Semi-Conductor\n- Optical & Aerospace\n- LLG Labware\n1.2 Desiccators Segment by Type\n1.2.1 Global Desiccators Market Size Growth Rate Analysis by Type 2021 VS 2027\n1.2.4 Gas Purge\n1.3 Desiccators Segment by Application\n1.3.1 Global Desiccators Consumption Comparison by Application: 2016 VS 2021 VS 2027\n1.3.5 Electronics & Semi-Conductor\n1.4.1 Global Desiccators Revenue Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.4.2 Global Desiccators Production Capacity Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.4.3 Global Desiccators Production Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.5 Global Desiccators Market by Region\n1.5.1 Global Desiccators Market Size Estimates and Forecasts by Region: 2016 VS 2021 VS 2027\n1.5.2 North America Desiccators Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.5.3 Europe Desiccators Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.5.5 China Desiccators Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n1.5.5 Japan Desiccators Estimates and Forecasts (2016-2027)\n2.1 Global Desiccators Production Capacity Market Share by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\n2.2 Global Desiccators Revenue Market Share by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\n2.3 Desiccators Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3)\n2.4 Global Desiccators Average Price by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\n2.5 Manufacturers Desiccators Production Sites, Area Served, Product Types\n2.6 Desiccators Market Competitive Situation and Trends\n2.6.1 Desiccators Market Concentration Rate\n2.6.2 Global 5 and 10 Largest Desiccators Players Market Share by Revenue\n3.1 Global Production Capacity of Desiccators Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\n3.2 Global Desiccators Revenue Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\n3.3 Global Desiccators Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n3.4 North America Desiccators Production\n3.4.1 North America Desiccators Production Growth Rate (2016-2021)\n3.4.2 North America Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n3.5 Europe Desiccators Production\n3.5.1 Europe Desiccators Production Growth Rate (2016-2021)\n3.5.2 Europe Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n3.6 China Desiccators Production\n3.6.1 China Desiccators Production Growth Rate (2016-2021)\n3.6.2 China Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n3.7 Japan Desiccators Production\n3.7.1 Japan Desiccators Production Growth Rate (2016-2021)\n3.7.2 Japan Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n4 Global Desiccators Consumption by Region\n4.1 Global Desiccators Consumption by Region\n4.1.1 Global Desiccators Consumption by Region\n4.1.2 Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Region\n4.2.1 North America Desiccators Consumption by Country\n4.3.1 Europe Desiccators Consumption by Country\n4.4.1 Asia Pacific Desiccators Consumption by Region\n4.5.1 Latin America Desiccators Consumption by Country\n5.1 Global Desiccators Production Market Share by Type (2016-2021)\n5.2 Global Desiccators Revenue Market Share by Type (2016-2021)\n5.3 Global Desiccators Price by Type (2016-2021)\n6.1 Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Application (2016-2021)\n6.2 Global Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2016-2021)\n7.1.1 Terra Universal Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.1.2 Terra Universal Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.1.3 Terra Universal Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.1.5 Terra Universal Recent Developments/Updates\n7.2.1 ESCO Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.2.2 ESCO Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.2.3 ESCO Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.2.5 ESCO Recent Developments/Updates\n7.3.1 Clean Air Products Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.3.2 Clean Air Products Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.3.3 Clean Air Products Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.3.4 Clean Air Products Main Business and Markets Served\n7.3.5 Clean Air Products Recent Developments/Updates\n7.4 Royal Imtech\n7.4.1 Royal Imtech Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.4.2 Royal Imtech Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.4.3 Royal Imtech Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.4.4 Royal Imtech Main Business and Markets Served\n7.4.5 Royal Imtech Recent Developments/Updates\n7.5.1 Azbil Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.5.2 Azbil Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.5.3 Azbil Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.5.4 Azbil Main Business and Markets Served\n7.5.5 Azbil Recent Developments/Updates\n7.6.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.6.2 Thermo Fisher Scientific Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.6.3 Thermo Fisher Scientific Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.6.5 Thermo Fisher Scientific Recent Developments/Updates\n7.7.1 DURAN Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.7.2 DURAN Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.7.3 DURAN Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.7.4 DURAN Main Business and Markets Served\n7.7.5 DURAN Recent Developments/Updates\n7.8 LLG Labware\n7.8.1 LLG Labware Desiccators Corporation Information\n7.8.2 LLG Labware Desiccators Product Portfolio\n7.8.3 LLG Labware Desiccators Production Capacity, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\n7.8.4 LLG Labware Main Business and Markets Served\n7.7.5 LLG Labware Recent Developments/Updates\n8 Desiccators Manufacturing Cost Analysis\n8.1 Desiccators Key Raw Materials Analysis\n8.3 Manufacturing Process Analysis of Desiccators\n8.4 Desiccators Industrial Chain Analysis\n9.2 Desiccators Distributors List\n9.3 Desiccators Customers\n10.1 Desiccators Industry Trends\n10.2 Desiccators Growth Drivers\n10.3 Desiccators Market Challenges\n10.4 Desiccators Market Restraints\n11.1 Global Forecasted Production of Desiccators by Region (2022-2027)\n11.2 North America Desiccators Production, Revenue Forecast (2022-2027)\n11.3 Europe Desiccators Production, Revenue Forecast (2022-2027)\n11.4 China Desiccators Production, Revenue Forecast (2022-2027)\n11.5 Japan Desiccators Production, Revenue Forecast (2022-2027)\n12.1 Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of Desiccators\n12.2 North America Forecasted Consumption of Desiccators by Country\n12.3 Europe Market Forecasted Consumption of Desiccators by Country\n12.4 Asia Pacific Market Forecasted Consumption of Desiccators by Region\n12.5 Latin America Forecasted Consumption of Desiccators by Country\n13.1.1 Global Forecasted Production of Desiccators by Type (2022-2027)\n13.1.2 Global Forecasted Revenue of Desiccators by Type (2022-2027)\n13.1.3 Global Forecasted Price of Desiccators by Type (2022-2027)\n13.2 Global Forecasted Consumption of Desiccators by Application (2022-2027)\nTable 1. Global Desiccators Market Size by Type (K Units) & (US$ Million) (2021 VS 2027)\nTable 2. Global Desiccators Consumption (K Units) Comparison by Application: 2016 VS 2021 VS 2027\nTable 3. Desiccators Market Size Comparison by Region: 2016 VS 2021 VS 2027\nTable 4. Global Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units) by Manufacturers\nTable 5. Global Desiccators Production (K Units) by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\nTable 6. Global Desiccators Production Market Share by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\nTable 7. Global Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\nTable 8. Global Desiccators Revenue Share by Manufacturers (2016-2021)\nTable 9. Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3) & (based on the Revenue in Desiccators as of 2020)\nTable 10. Global Market Desiccators Average Price (USD/Unit) of Key Manufacturers (2016-2021)\nTable 11. Manufacturers Desiccators Production Sites and Area Served\nTable 12. Manufacturers Desiccators Product Types\nTable 14. Global Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units) by Region (2016-2021)\nTable 15. Global Desiccators Production (K Units) by Region (2016-2021)\nTable 16. Global Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) by Region (2016-2021)\nTable 17. Global Desiccators Revenue Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\nTable 18. Global Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 19. North America Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 20. Europe Desiccators Production (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 21. China Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 22. Japan Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 23. Global Desiccators Consumption Market by Region (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 24. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\nTable 25. North America Desiccators Consumption by Country (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 26. Europe Desiccators Consumption by Country (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 27. Asia Pacific Desiccators Consumption by Region (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 28. Latin America Desiccators Consumption by Countries (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 29. Global Desiccators Production (K Units) by Type (2016-2021)\nTable 30. Global Desiccators Production Market Share by Type (2016-2021)\nTable 31. Global Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) by Type (2016-2021)\nTable 32. Global Desiccators Revenue Share by Type (2016-2021)\nTable 33. Global Desiccators Price (USD/Unit) by Type (2016-2021)\nTable 34. Global Desiccators Consumption by Application (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nTable 35. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Application (2016-2021)\nTable 36. Global Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2016-2021)\nTable 37. Terra Universal Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 38. Terra Universal Specification and Application\nTable 39. Terra Universal Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 40. Terra Universal Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 41. Terra Universal Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 42. ESCO Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 43. ESCO Specification and Application\nTable 44. ESCO Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 46. ESCO Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 47. Clean Air Products Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 48. Clean Air Products Specification and Application\nTable 49. Clean Air Products Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 50. Clean Air Products Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 51. Clean Air Products Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 52. Royal Imtech Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 53. Royal Imtech Specification and Application\nTable 54. Royal Imtech Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 55. Royal Imtech Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 56. Royal Imtech Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 57. Azbil Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 58. Azbil Specification and Application\nTable 59. Azbil Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 60. Azbil Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 61. Azbil Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 62. Thermo Fisher Scientific Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 64. Thermo Fisher Scientific Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 66. Thermo Fisher Scientific Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 67. DURAN Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 68. DURAN Specification and Application\nTable 69. DURAN Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 70. DURAN Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 71. DURAN Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 72. LLG Labware Desiccators Corporation Information\nTable 73. LLG Labware Specification and Application\nTable 74. LLG Labware Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units), Revenue (US$ Million), Price (USD/Unit) and Gross Margin (2016-2021)\nTable 75. LLG Labware Main Business and Markets Served\nTable 76. LLG Labware Recent Developments/Updates\nTable 79. Desiccators Distributors List\nTable 80. Desiccators Customers List\nTable 81. Desiccators Market Trends\nTable 82. Desiccators Growth Drivers\nTable 83. Desiccators Market Challenges\nTable 84. Desiccators Market Restraints\nTable 85. Global Desiccators Production (K Units) Forecast by Region (2022-2027)\nTable 86. North America Desiccators Consumption Forecast by Country (2022-2027) & (K Units)\nTable 87. Europe Desiccators Consumption Forecast by Country (2022-2027) & (K Units)\nTable 88. Asia Pacific Desiccators Consumption Forecast by Region (2022-2027) & (K Units)\nTable 89. Latin America Desiccators Consumption Forecast by Country (2022-2027) & (K Units)\nTable 90. Global Desiccators Production Forecast by Type (2022-2027) & (K Units)\nTable 91. Global Desiccators Revenue Forecast by Type (2022-2027) & (US$ Million)\nTable 92. Global Desiccators Price Forecast by Type (2022-2027) & (USD/Unit)\nTable 93. Global Desiccators Consumption (K Units) Forecast by Application (2022-2027)\nFigure 1. Product Picture of Desiccators\nFigure 2. Global Desiccators Market Share by Type: 2020 VS 2027\nFigure 5. Gas Purge Product Picture\nFigure 7. Global Desiccators Market Share by Application: 2020 VS 2027\nFigure 8. Animal Facilities\nFigure 10. Chemical Research Lab\nFigure 11. Electronics & Semi-Conductor\nFigure 12. Optical & Aerospace\nFigure 13. Global Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million), 2016 VS 2021 VS 2027\nFigure 14. Global Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) (2016-2027)\nFigure 15. Global Desiccators Production Capacity (K Units) & (2016-2027)\nFigure 16. Global Desiccators Production (K Units) & (2016-2027)\nFigure 17. North America Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) and Growth Rate (2016-2027)\nFigure 18. Europe Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) and Growth Rate (2016-2027)\nFigure 19. China Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) and Growth Rate (2016-2027)\nFigure 20. Japan Desiccators Revenue (US$ Million) and Growth Rate (2016-2027)\nFigure 21. Desiccators Production Share by Manufacturers in 2020\nFigure 22. Global Desiccators Revenue Share by Manufacturers in 2020\nFigure 23. Desiccators Market Share by Company Type (Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3): 2016 VS 2020\nFigure 24. Global Market Desiccators Average Price (USD/Unit) of Key Manufacturers in 2020\nFigure 25. The Global 5 and 10 Largest Players: Market Share by Desiccators Revenue in 2020\nFigure 26. Global Desiccators Production Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\nFigure 27. North America Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate (2016-2021)\nFigure 28. Europe Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate (2016-2021)\nFigure 29. China Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate (2016-2021)\nFigure 30. Japan Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate (2016-2021)\nFigure 31. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Region (2016-2021)\nFigure 32. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Region in 2020\nFigure 33. North America Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 34. North America Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Country in 2020\nFigure 35. Canada Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 36. U.S. Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 37. Europe Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 38. Europe Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Country in 2020\nFigure 39. Germany America Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 40. France Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 41. U.K. Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 42. Italy Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 43. Russia Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 44. Asia Pacific Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 45. Asia Pacific Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Regions in 2020\nFigure 46. China Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 47. Japan Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 48. South Korea Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 49. Taiwan Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 50. Southeast Asia Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 51. India Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 52. Australia Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 53. Latin America Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 54. Latin America Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Country in 2020\nFigure 55. Mexico Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 56. Brazil Desiccators Consumption and Growth Rate (2016-2021) & (K Units)\nFigure 57. Production Market Share of Desiccators by Type (2016-2021)\nFigure 58. Production Market Share of Desiccators by Type in 2020\nFigure 59. Revenue Share of Desiccators by Type (2016-2021)\nFigure 60. Revenue Market Share of Desiccators by Type in 2020\nFigure 61. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Application (2016-2021)\nFigure 62. Global Desiccators Consumption Market Share by Application in 2020\nFigure 63. Global Desiccators Consumption Growth Rate by Application (2016-2021)\nFigure 65. Manufacturing Cost Structure of Desiccators\nFigure 66. Manufacturing Process Analysis of Desiccators\nFigure 67. Desiccators Industrial Chain Analysis\nFigure 70. Global Desiccators Production Market Share Forecast by Region (2022-2027)\nFigure 71. North America Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2027)\nFigure 72. Europe Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2027)\nFigure 73. China Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2027)\nFigure 74. Japan Desiccators Production (K Units) Growth Rate Forecast (2022-2027)\nFigure 75. Global Forecasted Demand Analysis of Desiccators (2015-2027) & (K Units)\nFigure 76. Global Desiccators Production Market Share Forecast by Type (2022-2027)\nFigure 77. Global Desiccators Revenue Market Share Forecast by Type (2022-2027)\nFigure 78. Global Desiccators Consumption Forecast by Application (2022-2027)


coreanos Archives - qrendiscouts\nMejores Street Fashion Tik Tok Ep.114 | Douyin China | Chinese Girls Are Beautiful | Viable Fashion\nMejores Street Fashion Tik Tok / Douyin China Ep. 10\nMejores Street Fashion Tik Tok / Douyin China Ep. 09


OpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800150K300K450K600K750KSE +/- 2392.15, N = 3SE +/- 6930.39, N = 4SE +/- 2259.34, N = 3SE +/- 3626.25, N = 3SE +/- 5439.02, N = 3SE +/- 2301.94, N = 3SE +/- 1430.99, N = 3SE +/- 368.09, N = 3SE +/- 1065.99, N = 3SE +/- 1257.80, N = 3SE +/- 940.16, N = 3SE +/- 1729.48, N = 3SE +/- 4525.01, N = 3SE +/- 6473.88, N = 3SE +/- 9204.28, N = 3SE +/- 297.41, N = 3SE +/- 555.65, N = 3SE +/- 1124.12, N = 3SE +/- 1590.98, N = 3SE +/- 737.38, N = 3SE +/- 3311.57, N = 3SE +/- 417.97, N = 3SE +/- 4297.10, N = 3SE +/- 8590.92, N = 6SE +/- 633.92, N = 3SE +/- 3177.90, N = 3SE +/- 3008.27, N = 3572092431108395609413882390105405418365419387823388482343898474711345560678465644293506177588730616281571880526913512718362807531584561562429258239668336831303743\nOpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800120K240K360K480K600KMin: 569533 / Avg: 572091.67 / Max: 576872Min: 410448 / Avg: 431108.25 / Max: 440133Min: 392784 / Avg: 395609.33 / Max: 400076Min: 406668 / Avg: 413882.33 / Max: 418133Min: 379227 / Avg: 390104.67 / Max: 395622Min: 402521 / Avg: 405417.67 / Max: 409965Min: 362884 / Avg: 365418.67 / Max: 367837Min: 387129 / Avg: 387822.67 / Max: 388383Min: 386363 / Avg: 388481.67 / Max: 389747Min: 342125 / Avg: 343898 / Max: 346330Min: 472838 / Avg: 474711 / Max: 475791Min: 342826 / Avg: 345560 / Max: 348762Min: 673921 / Avg: 678465 / Max: 687515Min: 637469 / Avg: 644292.67 / Max: 657234Min: 488748 / Avg: 506176.67 / Max: 520023Min: 588135 / Avg: 588729.67 / Max: 589039Min: 615427 / Avg: 616281.33 / Max: 617324Min: 570658 / Avg: 571879.67 / Max: 574125Min: 523773 / Avg: 526913 / Max: 528929Min: 511496 / Avg: 512718 / Max: 514044Min: 356190 / Avg: 362807.33 / Max: 366356Min: 530766 / Avg: 531583.67 / Max: 532143Min: 554201 / Avg: 561562.33 / Max: 569084Min: 404436 / Avg: 429258 / Max: 452508Min: 238689 / Avg: 239667.67 / Max: 240855Min: 330539 / Avg: 336831 / Max: 340755Min: 298654 / Avg: 303743 / Max: 309067\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-780010K20K30K40K50KSE +/- 301.24, N = 3SE +/- 25.31, N = 3SE +/- 208.54, N = 3SE +/- 37.17, N = 3SE +/- 277.67, N = 3SE +/- 87.23, N = 3SE +/- 98.06, N = 3SE +/- 61.06, N = 3SE +/- 745.48, N = 4SE +/- 298.62, N = 3SE +/- 83.02, N = 3SE +/- 126.58, N = 3SE +/- 373.36, N = 3SE +/- 170.41, N = 3SE +/- 92.35, N = 3SE +/- 35.71, N = 3SE +/- 28.82, N = 3SE +/- 120.15, N = 3SE +/- 78.04, N = 3SE +/- 355.83, N = 3SE +/- 140.71, N = 3SE +/- 77.47, N = 333018.5832963.7229819.8233449.5733621.4532633.1929144.7322446.8322343.8319627.7644915.5745475.8536373.8440533.4040483.4439233.6534799.8035671.6820761.8536311.0636757.0720655.2821358.8619113.271. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-78008K16K24K32K40KMin: 32418.9 / Avg: 33018.58 / Max: 33368.77Min: 32921.79 / Avg: 32963.72 / Max: 33009.23Min: 29402.98 / Avg: 29819.82 / Max: 30040.39Min: 32560.93 / Avg: 32633.19 / Max: 32684.42Min: 28597.15 / Avg: 29144.73 / Max: 29498.62Min: 22282.6 / Avg: 22446.83 / Max: 22579.93Min: 22174.59 / Avg: 22343.83 / Max: 22514.26Min: 19558.08 / Avg: 19627.76 / Max: 19749.45Min: 43312.56 / Avg: 44915.57 / Max: 46498.91Min: 45054.33 / Avg: 45475.85 / Max: 46053.03Min: 36247.78 / Avg: 36373.84 / Max: 36530.47Min: 40326.41 / Avg: 40533.4 / Max: 40763.13Min: 39839.66 / Avg: 40483.44 / Max: 41132.97Min: 39014.07 / Avg: 39233.65 / Max: 39569.18Min: 34690.7 / Avg: 34799.8 / Max: 34983.41Min: 35612.44 / Avg: 35671.68 / Max: 35735.85Min: 20709.8 / Avg: 20761.85 / Max: 20809.31Min: 36088.59 / Avg: 36311.06 / Max: 36500.98Min: 36636.36 / Avg: 36757.07 / Max: 36903.12Min: 20219.59 / Avg: 20655.28 / Max: 21360.43Min: 21093.76 / Avg: 21358.86 / Max: 21573.18Min: 19016.12 / Avg: 19113.27 / Max: 19266.371. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread -lcrypt -lcrypto -lz -O3 -march=native\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2008-08-14Total For Average Test TimesXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780010002000300040005000SE +/- 3.06, N = 3SE +/- 3.21, N = 3SE +/- 1.45, N = 3SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 7.64, N = 3SE +/- 2.91, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 2.33, N = 3SE +/- 1.53, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.58, N = 3SE +/- 1.53, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 0.88, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 4.04, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 1.15, N = 3SE +/- 2.73, N = 3SE +/- 42.23, N = 3SE +/- 5.00, N = 3SE +/- 3.53, N = 31358139515181458154714981655205020522048103110751356120911491239134213901723134012371565453820282264\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2008-08-14Total For Average Test TimesXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78008001600240032004000Min: 1354 / Avg: 1358 / Max: 1364Min: 1389 / Avg: 1395 / Max: 1400Min: 1516 / Avg: 1518.33 / Max: 1521Min: 1454 / Avg: 1457.67 / Max: 1461Min: 1537 / Avg: 1547 / Max: 1562Min: 1493 / Avg: 1497.67 / Max: 1503Min: 1654 / Avg: 1655 / Max: 1656Min: 2046 / Avg: 2050.33 / Max: 2054Min: 2045 / Avg: 2048 / Max: 2050Min: 1030 / Avg: 1031 / Max: 1033Min: 1074 / Avg: 1075 / Max: 1076Min: 1353 / Avg: 1356 / Max: 1358Min: 1205 / Avg: 1208.67 / Max: 1214Min: 1238 / Avg: 1239.33 / Max: 1241Min: 1340 / Avg: 1342 / Max: 1344Min: 1716 / Avg: 1723 / Max: 1730Min: 1338 / Avg: 1340 / Max: 1341Min: 1235 / Avg: 1237 / Max: 1239Min: 1561 / Avg: 1564.67 / Max: 1570Min: 4483 / Avg: 4538 / Max: 4621Min: 2023 / Avg: 2028 / Max: 2038Min: 2257 / Avg: 2263.67 / Max: 2269\nOpenBenchmarking.orgOps/s, More Is BetterJava JMHThroughputXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-78006000M12000M18000M24000M30000M7616483109.8514780854841.4312783688167.027405453444.917385107172.347169110974.226174078042.823308623091.183290435517.9711941642502.187540791805.648056296946.0425756200607.8017920802344.2415499195578.8422775463201.2515983591764.1815582092811.1313187679149.7214337275794.9912391166252.2814382333764.737790129336.236739708280.863894123975.293487059908.24\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.0fRSA 4096-bit PerformanceXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XPentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800400800120016002000SE +/- 8.05, N = 3SE +/- 1.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 3SE +/- 9.70, N = 3SE +/- 4.62, N = 3SE +/- 18.43, N = 6SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 1.76, N = 3SE +/- 0.56, N = 3SE +/- 1.48, N = 3SE +/- 20.41, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 18.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 12.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 8.23, N = 6SE +/- 12.97, N = 3SE +/- 1.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 1.05, N = 3SE +/- 1.70, N = 3534.631592.871380.13793.80734.20710.53232.97232.93413.27826.33705.201979.571312.90689.301671.201147.731143.33942.73645.10499.231042.83597.13308.97317.37339.70299.731. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.1.0fRSA 4096-bit PerformanceXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XPentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780030060090012001500Min: 520.7 / Avg: 534.63 / Max: 548.6Min: 1590.8 / Avg: 1592.87 / Max: 1594.5Min: 1378.7 / Avg: 1380.13 / Max: 1381.4Min: 774.4 / Avg: 793.8 / Max: 803.6Min: 728.3 / Avg: 734.2 / Max: 743.3Min: 618.4 / Avg: 710.53 / Max: 729.4Min: 232.9 / Avg: 232.97 / Max: 233.1Min: 232.5 / Avg: 232.93 / Max: 233.2Min: 413.2 / Avg: 413.27 / Max: 413.3Min: 823.2 / Avg: 826.33 / Max: 829.3Min: 704.5 / Avg: 705.2 / Max: 706.3Min: 1976.9 / Avg: 1979.57 / Max: 1982Min: 1272.2 / Avg: 1312.9 / Max: 1335.9Min: 688.9 / Avg: 689.3 / Max: 689.5Min: 1670.5 / Avg: 1671.2 / Max: 1671.7Min: 1112.3 / Avg: 1147.73 / Max: 1173.2Min: 1143.3 / Avg: 1143.33 / Max: 1143.4Min: 929.1 / Avg: 942.73 / Max: 967.4Min: 643.5 / Avg: 645.1 / Max: 646.3Min: 484.2 / Avg: 499.23 / Max: 538.7Min: 1016.9 / Avg: 1042.83 / Max: 1056Min: 595.4 / Avg: 597.13 / Max: 599.1Min: 308.9 / Avg: 308.97 / Max: 309Min: 316.2 / Avg: 317.37 / Max: 318.1Min: 337.6 / Avg: 339.7 / Max: 340.8Min: 297.3 / Avg: 299.73 / Max: 3031. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -pthread -m64 -lssl -lcrypto -ldl\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: ProcessXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XPentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78004080120160200SE +/- 0.78, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 4SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 2.94, N = 6SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 6SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.40, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 0.54, N = 3SE +/- 0.70, N = 3SE +/- 1.28, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 0.64, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 351.0617.9620.0733.2950.2463.63173.66173.6996.4948.4750.7322.5030.4537.7239.6657.6358.1967.4165.1981.1762.1872.50119.94115.6184.2697.811. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterHackbenchCount: 8 - Type: ProcessXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XPentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800306090120150Min: 49.55 / Avg: 51.06 / Max: 52.17Min: 17.52 / Avg: 17.96 / Max: 18.81Min: 19.69 / Avg: 20.07 / Max: 20.65Min: 32.69 / Avg: 33.29 / Max: 33.63Min: 49.76 / Avg: 50.24 / Max: 50.87Min: 62.29 / Avg: 63.63 / Max: 64.82Min: 172.86 / Avg: 173.66 / Max: 174.55Min: 172.87 / Avg: 173.69 / Max: 174.54Min: 93.7 / Avg: 96.49 / Max: 100.09Min: 33.81 / Avg: 48.47 / Max: 51.96Min: 50.68 / Avg: 50.73 / Max: 50.77Min: 21.97 / Avg: 22.5 / Max: 24.95Min: 30.16 / Avg: 30.45 / Max: 30.62Min: 37.64 / Avg: 37.72 / Max: 37.82Min: 39.26 / Avg: 39.66 / Max: 40.37Min: 57.18 / Avg: 57.63 / Max: 58.42Min: 57.11 / Avg: 58.19 / Max: 59.23Min: 66.34 / Avg: 67.41 / Max: 68.06Min: 64.48 / Avg: 65.19 / Max: 66.58Min: 78.74 / Avg: 81.17 / Max: 83.07Min: 61.09 / Avg: 62.18 / Max: 63.87Min: 72.3 / Avg: 72.5 / Max: 72.72Min: 119.12 / Avg: 119.94 / Max: 120.46Min: 114.76 / Avg: 115.61 / Max: 116.86Min: 84.14 / Avg: 84.26 / Max: 84.36Min: 97.6 / Avg: 97.81 / Max: 98.231. (CC) gcc options: -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.100WAV To MP3Xeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780020406080100SE +/- 0.48, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 333.4833.5036.5935.1937.1335.7839.6848.1548.1747.2435.9747.0326.0727.5032.5430.0128.7730.9533.5133.2537.3633.3031.0838.9480.2048.3754.171. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterLAME MP3 Encoding 3.100WAV To MP3Xeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78001530456075Min: 32.54 / Avg: 33.48 / Max: 34.11Min: 33.33 / Avg: 33.5 / Max: 33.8Min: 36.58 / Avg: 36.59 / Max: 36.6Min: 35.14 / Avg: 35.19 / Max: 35.21Min: 37.07 / Avg: 37.13 / Max: 37.19Min: 35.67 / Avg: 35.78 / Max: 35.88Min: 39.62 / Avg: 39.68 / Max: 39.73Min: 48.12 / Avg: 48.15 / Max: 48.17Min: 48.14 / Avg: 48.17 / Max: 48.19Min: 47.2 / Avg: 47.24 / Max: 47.27Min: 35.84 / Avg: 35.97 / Max: 36.06Min: 46.96 / Avg: 47.03 / Max: 47.17Min: 25.81 / Avg: 26.07 / Max: 26.47Min: 27.23 / Avg: 27.5 / Max: 27.64Min: 32.46 / Avg: 32.54 / Max: 32.69Min: 30 / Avg: 30.01 / Max: 30.01Min: 28.75 / Avg: 28.77 / Max: 28.81Min: 30.95 / Avg: 30.95 / Max: 30.96Min: 33.49 / Avg: 33.51 / Max: 33.52Min: 33.24 / Avg: 33.25 / Max: 33.26Min: 37.32 / Avg: 37.36 / Max: 37.44Min: 33.28 / Avg: 33.3 / Max: 33.31Min: 31.06 / Avg: 31.08 / Max: 31.1Min: 37.65 / Avg: 38.94 / Max: 39.94Min: 80.11 / Avg: 80.2 / Max: 80.34Min: 48.31 / Avg: 48.37 / Max: 48.4Min: 54.05 / Avg: 54.17 / Max: 54.241. (CC) gcc options: -lm\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPOV-Ray 3.7.0.7Trace TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-7800100200300400500SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 1.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.98, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 3.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 3SE +/- 0.26, N = 3166.1256.2164.40107.39153.63156.29181.19439.09439.57228.08108.18134.0160.9687.94131.0987.94125.90126.84149.84147.13228.83139.02200.73267.70242.07270.861. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPOV-Ray 3.7.0.7Trace TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-780080160240320400Min: 165.98 / Avg: 166.12 / Max: 166.3Min: 56.12 / Avg: 56.21 / Max: 56.28Min: 64.37 / Avg: 64.4 / Max: 64.43Min: 107.07 / Avg: 107.39 / Max: 107.65Min: 152.93 / Avg: 153.63 / Max: 154.07Min: 156.09 / Avg: 156.29 / Max: 156.6Min: 180.93 / Avg: 181.19 / Max: 181.32Min: 438.56 / Avg: 439.09 / Max: 439.46Min: 439.43 / Avg: 439.57 / Max: 439.72Min: 226.24 / Avg: 228.08 / Max: 230.28Min: 106.77 / Avg: 108.18 / Max: 110.06Min: 133.56 / Avg: 134.01 / Max: 134.39Min: 60.89 / Avg: 60.96 / Max: 61.08Min: 87.86 / Avg: 87.94 / Max: 88.05Min: 130.76 / Avg: 131.09 / Max: 131.32Min: 87.87 / Avg: 87.94 / Max: 88.02Min: 125.07 / Avg: 125.9 / Max: 127.22Min: 126.76 / Avg: 126.84 / Max: 126.95Min: 149.75 / Avg: 149.84 / Max: 149.97Min: 146.97 / Avg: 147.13 / Max: 147.22Min: 224.1 / Avg: 228.83 / Max: 235.18Min: 138.88 / Avg: 139.02 / Max: 139.1Min: 200.61 / Avg: 200.73 / Max: 200.9Min: 267.25 / Avg: 267.7 / Max: 268.06Min: 241.84 / Avg: 242.07 / Max: 242.46Min: 270.37 / Avg: 270.86 / Max: 271.291. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -O3 -ffast-math -march=native -pthread -lSDL -lSM -lICE -lX11 -ltiff -ljpeg -lpng -lz -lrt -lm -lboost_thread -lboost_system\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780020406080100SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 331.469.7011.2319.4821.0721.5024.9576.0176.0244.6919.1828.0112.7818.6924.5115.5722.2522.8326.9727.4039.0024.6541.9754.2858.8055.0961.751. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78001530456075Min: 30.88 / Avg: 31.46 / Max: 31.75Min: 9.69 / Avg: 9.7 / Max: 9.72Min: 11.23 / Avg: 11.23 / Max: 11.24Min: 19.17 / Avg: 19.48 / Max: 19.69Min: 20.9 / Avg: 21.07 / Max: 21.15Min: 21.49 / Avg: 21.5 / Max: 21.5Min: 24.93 / Avg: 24.95 / Max: 24.96Min: 76 / Avg: 76.01 / Max: 76.02Min: 76.01 / Avg: 76.02 / Max: 76.03Min: 44.65 / Avg: 44.69 / Max: 44.76Min: 18.8 / Avg: 19.18 / Max: 19.54Min: 27.99 / Avg: 28.01 / Max: 28.02Min: 12.76 / Avg: 12.78 / Max: 12.79Min: 18.42 / Avg: 18.69 / Max: 18.98Min: 24.48 / Avg: 24.51 / Max: 24.53Min: 15.55 / Avg: 15.57 / Max: 15.59Min: 22.23 / Avg: 22.25 / Max: 22.27Min: 22.79 / Avg: 22.83 / Max: 22.87Min: 26.94 / Avg: 26.97 / Max: 26.99Min: 27.38 / Avg: 27.4 / Max: 27.42Min: 38.38 / Avg: 39 / Max: 39.35Min: 24.61 / Avg: 24.65 / Max: 24.67Min: 41.95 / Avg: 41.97 / Max: 42.01Min: 54.21 / Avg: 54.28 / Max: 54.4Min: 58.75 / Avg: 58.8 / Max: 58.87Min: 55.06 / Avg: 55.09 / Max: 55.14Min: 61.73 / Avg: 61.75 / Max: 61.791. (CC) gcc options: -lm -lpthread -O3\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.13Time To CompileXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800110220330440550SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 1.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.10, N = 3SE +/- 1.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.68, N = 3SE +/- 0.61, N = 3SE +/- 1.13, N = 3SE +/- 1.47, N = 3SE +/- 1.79, N = 3SE +/- 2.78, N = 3SE +/- 1.44, N = 3SE +/- 2.28, N = 6SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 1.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.87, N = 3SE +/- 0.93, N = 3SE +/- 1.11, N = 3SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 1.70, N = 3SE +/- 0.96, N = 3SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 1.26, N = 3SE +/- 7.35, N = 3SE +/- 1.88, N = 3SE +/- 1.55, N = 3184.5985.2295.17153.49201.48458.00484.57500.01500.66286.83163.41167.8579.10106.97150.12108.02157.58158.43181.66180.98264.97167.81246.44426.59401.51300.92342.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed Linux Kernel Compilation 4.13Time To CompileXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780090180270360450Min: 183.22 / Avg: 184.59 / Max: 186.35Min: 84.16 / Avg: 85.22 / Max: 87.14Min: 93.74 / Avg: 95.17 / Max: 97.59Min: 152.3 / Avg: 153.49 / Max: 155.68Min: 200.21 / Avg: 201.48 / Max: 203.78Min: 457.3 / Avg: 458 / Max: 459.35Min: 483.77 / Avg: 484.57 / Max: 485.78Min: 498.73 / Avg: 500.01 / Max: 502.26Min: 498.87 / Avg: 500.66 / Max: 503.58Min: 284.35 / Avg: 286.83 / Max: 290.31Min: 158.59 / Avg: 163.41 / Max: 168.21Min: 166.37 / Avg: 167.85 / Max: 170.73Min: 76.5 / Avg: 79.1 / Max: 90.47Min: 106.37 / Avg: 106.97 / Max: 108.15Min: 149.2 / Avg: 150.12 / Max: 151.93Min: 106.94 / Avg: 108.02 / Max: 110.14Min: 156.47 / Avg: 157.58 / Max: 159.3Min: 157.42 / Avg: 158.43 / Max: 160.3Min: 180.37 / Avg: 181.66 / Max: 183.87Min: 179.69 / Avg: 180.98 / Max: 183.46Min: 263.22 / Avg: 264.97 / Max: 268.38Min: 166.79 / Avg: 167.81 / Max: 169.74Min: 245.22 / Avg: 246.44 / Max: 248.71Min: 425.09 / Avg: 426.59 / Max: 429.1Min: 392.58 / Avg: 401.51 / Max: 416.08Min: 298.94 / Avg: 300.92 / Max: 304.68Min: 341.2 / Avg: 342.81 / Max: 345.9\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2017-09-191024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78005M10M15M20M25MSE +/- 119029.54, N = 3SE +/- 185935.11, N = 3SE +/- 134030.97, N = 3SE +/- 86758.86, N = 3SE +/- 58465.70, N = 3SE +/- 71539.42, N = 3SE +/- 32851.54, N = 3SE +/- 1210.24, N = 3SE +/- 27035.13, N = 3SE +/- 37853.57, N = 3SE +/- 58907.95, N = 3SE +/- 41301.48, N = 3SE +/- 98474.23, N = 3SE +/- 107030.57, N = 3SE +/- 144340.27, N = 3SE +/- 151218.80, N = 3SE +/- 40922.10, N = 3SE +/- 15680.79, N = 3SE +/- 48564.45, N = 3SE +/- 120113.78, N = 3SE +/- 121836.68, N = 4SE +/- 92419.13, N = 3SE +/- 43759.67, N = 3SE +/- 1939.68, N = 3SE +/- 34422.88, N = 3SE +/- 79805.69, N = 3SE +/- 29142.75, N = 397756292267847920101605123567828579597828613473237493261490329155272279791242041311705326234377311589586912321019159135821026935110051165896752395727447366182984158667830284907458486859362140065433893\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNodes/second, More Is BetterasmFish 2017-09-191024 Hash Memory, 26 DepthXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78004M8M12M16M20MMin: 9580140 / Avg: 9775628.67 / Max: 9991026Min: 22433626 / Avg: 22678478.67 / Max: 23043291Min: 19935859 / Avg: 20101605 / Max: 20366931Min: 12220223 / Avg: 12356782.33 / Max: 12517771Min: 8466509 / Avg: 8579597.33 / Max: 8661890Min: 8166379 / Avg: 8286134 / Max: 8413818Min: 7277871 / Avg: 7323749.33 / Max: 7387420Min: 3259857 / Avg: 3261490.33 / Max: 3263854Min: 3260581 / Avg: 3291552 / Max: 3345421Min: 7176097 / Avg: 7227979 / Max: 7301668Min: 12304932 / Avg: 12420413 / Max: 12498366Min: 11634037 / Avg: 11705326.33 / Max: 11777107Min: 23252067 / Avg: 23437731 / Max: 23587468Min: 15688544 / Avg: 15895868.67 / Max: 16045672Min: 12076617 / Avg: 12321019.33 / Max: 12576273Min: 15713614 / Avg: 15913582.33 / Max: 16210063Min: 10217957 / Avg: 10269351 / Max: 10350210Min: 10031205 / Avg: 10051165 / Max: 10082094Min: 8885452 / Avg: 8967523.33 / Max: 9053545Min: 9383905 / Avg: 9572743.67 / Max: 9795759Min: 7150968 / Avg: 7366182.25 / Max: 7715987Min: 9733246 / Avg: 9841586.33 / Max: 10025451Min: 6696887 / Avg: 6783028.33 / Max: 6839496Min: 4903817 / Avg: 4907458 / Max: 4910438Min: 4829355 / Avg: 4868593.33 / Max: 4937203Min: 6114659 / Avg: 6214006.33 / Max: 6371867Min: 5404480 / Avg: 5433893.33 / Max: 5492178\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.20.1Compress Speed TestXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78008K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 190.62, N = 3SE +/- 276.94, N = 3SE +/- 101.52, N = 3SE +/- 290.74, N = 4SE +/- 45.83, N = 3SE +/- 169.00, N = 3SE +/- 79.25, N = 3SE +/- 30.77, N = 3SE +/- 9.29, N = 3SE +/- 104.74, N = 3SE +/- 34.71, N = 3SE +/- 232.19, N = 3SE +/- 483.48, N = 3SE +/- 165.84, N = 3SE +/- 36.34, N = 3SE +/- 31.22, N = 3SE +/- 11.02, N = 3SE +/- 7.62, N = 3SE +/- 81.66, N = 3SE +/- 216.64, N = 4SE +/- 21.39, N = 3SE +/- 6.03, N = 3SE +/- 63.52, N = 3SE +/- 25.85, N = 3SE +/- 91.54, N = 3SE +/- 88.29, N = 318386330223062717729157441588012601610861101187418918220973903928952216672702817727180791511616595141001722112896899281571143199831. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 9.20.1Compress Speed TestXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78007K14K21K28K35KMin: 18005 / Avg: 18385.67 / Max: 18594Min: 32622 / Avg: 33022.33 / Max: 33554Min: 30438 / Avg: 30626.67 / Max: 30786Min: 17137 / Avg: 17728.75 / Max: 18457Min: 15683 / Avg: 15744.33 / Max: 15834Min: 15558 / Avg: 15880 / Max: 16130Min: 5950 / Avg: 6108 / Max: 6198Min: 6069 / Avg: 6109.67 / Max: 6170Min: 11856 / Avg: 11874 / Max: 11887Min: 18754 / Avg: 18918.33 / Max: 19113Min: 22028 / Avg: 22097.33 / Max: 22135Min: 38780 / Avg: 39038.67 / Max: 39502Min: 28218 / Avg: 28951.67 / Max: 29864Min: 21339 / Avg: 21666.67 / Max: 21875Min: 26955 / Avg: 27027.67 / Max: 27065Min: 17671 / Avg: 17726.67 / Max: 17779Min: 18059 / Avg: 18079 / Max: 18097Min: 15104 / Avg: 15115.67 / Max: 15130Min: 16433 / Avg: 16595.33 / Max: 16692Min: 13854 / Avg: 14100 / Max: 14749Min: 17183 / Avg: 17221 / Max: 17257Min: 12884 / Avg: 12896 / Max: 12903Min: 8894 / Avg: 8992 / Max: 9111Min: 8110 / Avg: 8157.33 / Max: 8199Min: 11248 / Avg: 11431 / Max: 11527Min: 9821 / Avg: 9982.67 / Max: 101251. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-02-05H.264 Video EncodingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-78001632486480SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.01, N = 4SE +/- 0.58, N = 4SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 6SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.45, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.48, N = 4SE +/- 1.49, N = 6SE +/- 0.41, N = 6SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 330.2371.4660.9034.7527.6027.3323.4712.2412.1817.6439.5030.5872.9649.9537.6456.1133.4933.1128.4728.1619.8330.4223.8915.4717.5815.611. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-02-05H.264 Video EncodingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-78001428425670Min: 29.81 / Avg: 30.23 / Max: 30.51Min: 71.02 / Avg: 71.46 / Max: 71.74Min: 57.9 / Avg: 60.9 / Max: 62.19Min: 33.04 / Avg: 34.75 / Max: 35.53Min: 27.57 / Avg: 27.6 / Max: 27.64Min: 27.26 / Avg: 27.33 / Max: 27.36Min: 21.83 / Avg: 23.47 / Max: 23.9Min: 12.22 / Avg: 12.24 / Max: 12.26Min: 11.95 / Avg: 12.18 / Max: 12.29Min: 17.47 / Avg: 17.64 / Max: 17.76Min: 38.67 / Avg: 39.5 / Max: 40.2Min: 30.52 / Avg: 30.58 / Max: 30.64Min: 72.52 / Avg: 72.96 / Max: 73.22Min: 49.66 / Avg: 49.95 / Max: 50.26Min: 37.61 / Avg: 37.64 / Max: 37.68Min: 56 / Avg: 56.11 / Max: 56.19Min: 33.46 / Avg: 33.49 / Max: 33.5Min: 33.05 / Avg: 33.11 / Max: 33.17Min: 28.35 / Avg: 28.47 / Max: 28.54Min: 26.72 / Avg: 28.16 / Max: 28.69Min: 12.49 / Avg: 19.83 / Max: 22.2Min: 28.37 / Avg: 30.42 / Max: 30.92Min: 23.86 / Avg: 23.89 / Max: 23.93Min: 15.43 / Avg: 15.47 / Max: 15.51Min: 17.57 / Avg: 17.58 / Max: 17.58Min: 15.59 / Avg: 15.61 / Max: 15.621. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterTTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3aPhong Rendering With Soft-Shadow MappingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780080160240320400SE +/- 1.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 1.74, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.50, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.60, N = 3SE +/- 2.82, N = 3SE +/- 2.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.39, N = 3SE +/- 1.47, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 6SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3162.89312.22274.64211.60178.17134.97122.9556.5556.51117.85238.68142.75391.67277.43204.31263.63187.90184.72158.22155.77129.90168.27121.6973.5552.1582.9367.421. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -lSDL -lstdc++\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFPS, More Is BetterTTSIOD 3D Renderer 2.3aPhong Rendering With Soft-Shadow MappingXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780070140210280350Min: 160.84 / Avg: 162.89 / Max: 165.39Min: 311.84 / Avg: 312.22 / Max: 312.91Min: 274.42 / Avg: 274.64 / Max: 274.85Min: 208.91 / Avg: 211.6 / Max: 214.85Min: 177.13 / Avg: 178.17 / Max: 179.82Min: 134.64 / Avg: 134.97 / Max: 135.15Min: 121.98 / Avg: 122.95 / Max: 123.45Min: 55.98 / Avg: 56.55 / Max: 56.93Min: 56 / Avg: 56.51 / Max: 57.03Min: 117.58 / Avg: 117.85 / Max: 118.14Min: 237.8 / Avg: 238.68 / Max: 239.54Min: 141.26 / Avg: 142.75 / Max: 144.2Min: 390.78 / Avg: 391.67 / Max: 392.8Min: 273.25 / Avg: 277.43 / Max: 282.79Min: 201.96 / Avg: 204.31 / Max: 208.36Min: 263.44 / Avg: 263.63 / Max: 263.99Min: 187.66 / Avg: 187.9 / Max: 188.35Min: 182.24 / Avg: 184.72 / Max: 185.98Min: 158 / Avg: 158.22 / Max: 158.34Min: 155.09 / Avg: 155.77 / Max: 156.44Min: 128.15 / Avg: 129.9 / Max: 132.81Min: 167.21 / Avg: 168.27 / Max: 169.03Min: 121.35 / Avg: 121.69 / Max: 122.03Min: 72.79 / Avg: 73.55 / Max: 73.94Min: 49.12 / Avg: 52.15 / Max: 53.88Min: 82.8 / Avg: 82.93 / Max: 83.06Min: 67.23 / Avg: 67.42 / Max: 67.591. (CXX) g++ options: -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -ffast-math -mtune=native -flto -msse -mrecip -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -lSDL -lstdc++\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpen FMM Nero2D 2.0.2Total TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-780060120180240300SE +/- 0.53, N = 3SE +/- 0.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.52, N = 3SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 4.64, N = 3SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.85, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 1.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.35, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.63, N = 3SE +/- 1.82, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 1.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.79, N = 3SE +/- 0.89, N = 3127.9250.1557.4890.5692.0994.39109.59276.71274.45153.9387.41119.8954.9876.3698.2161.0483.9885.71100.83102.83141.1292.61165.73209.51251.40280.431. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lfftw3 -llapack -lgfortran -lquadmath -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterOpen FMM Nero2D 2.0.2Total TimeXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-780050100150200250Min: 126.9 / Avg: 127.92 / Max: 128.65Min: 49.61 / Avg: 50.15 / Max: 50.68Min: 57.17 / Avg: 57.48 / Max: 57.69Min: 90 / Avg: 90.56 / Max: 91.59Min: 91.79 / Avg: 92.09 / Max: 92.4Min: 94.29 / Avg: 94.39 / Max: 94.51Min: 109.19 / Avg: 109.59 / Max: 109.86Min: 272.04 / Avg: 276.71 / Max: 286Min: 272.12 / Avg: 274.45 / Max: 276.35Min: 152.45 / Avg: 153.93 / Max: 155.41Min: 87.35 / Avg: 87.41 / Max: 87.5Min: 117.78 / Avg: 119.89 / Max: 122.03Min: 54.38 / Avg: 54.98 / Max: 55.46Min: 75.91 / Avg: 76.36 / Max: 76.71Min: 97.55 / Avg: 98.21 / Max: 98.75Min: 60.37 / Avg: 61.04 / Max: 61.78Min: 83.33 / Avg: 83.98 / Max: 84.42Min: 85.45 / Avg: 85.71 / Max: 86.13Min: 100.66 / Avg: 100.83 / Max: 100.98Min: 102.18 / Avg: 102.83 / Max: 104.09Min: 138.16 / Avg: 141.12 / Max: 144.44Min: 91.9 / Avg: 92.61 / Max: 92.99Min: 165.2 / Avg: 165.73 / Max: 166.38Min: 207.33 / Avg: 209.51 / Max: 211.19Min: 249.84 / Avg: 251.4 / Max: 252.4Min: 278.71 / Avg: 280.43 / Max: 281.661. (CXX) g++ options: -O2 -lfftw3 -llapack -lgfortran -lquadmath -lm -pthread -lmpi_cxx -lmpi\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0Test: BlowfishXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78003K6K9K12K15KSE +/- 75.64, N = 3SE +/- 7.54, N = 3SE +/- 50.04, N = 3SE +/- 96.59, N = 6SE +/- 4.67, N = 3SE +/- 8.50, N = 3SE +/- 17.29, N = 3SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 18.55, N = 3SE +/- 21.71, N = 3SE +/- 126.37, N = 3SE +/- 2.89, N = 3SE +/- 2.67, N = 3SE +/- 4.33, N = 3SE +/- 47.17, N = 3SE +/- 5.20, N = 3SE +/- 16.76, N = 3SE +/- 1.67, N = 3SE +/- 5.67, N = 35043124451043160224540439337111469147127646357682612758888068006998491047854046408029924411385930082185377533731. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -lcrypt\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0Test: BlowfishXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78002K4K6K8K10KMin: 4895 / Avg: 5042.67 / Max: 5145Min: 12435 / Avg: 12445.33 / Max: 12460Min: 10348 / Avg: 10431.33 / Max: 10521Min: 5786 / Avg: 6021.83 / Max: 6323Min: 4531 / Avg: 4540.33 / Max: 4545Min: 4377 / Avg: 4393 / Max: 4406Min: 3686 / Avg: 3710.67 / Max: 3744Min: 1468 / Avg: 1469 / Max: 1471Min: 6332 / Avg: 6356.67 / Max: 6393Min: 6783 / Avg: 6825.67 / Max: 6854Min: 6547 / Avg: 6799.67 / Max: 6931Min: 4780 / Avg: 4785 / Max: 4790Min: 4043 / Avg: 4045.67 / Max: 4051Min: 4071 / Avg: 4079.67 / Max: 4084Min: 2898 / Avg: 2992.33 / Max: 3041Min: 4402 / Avg: 4411 / Max: 4420Min: 2160 / Avg: 2185.33 / Max: 2217Min: 3772 / Avg: 3775.33 / Max: 3777Min: 3362 / Avg: 3373.33 / Max: 33791. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -lcrypt\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 6.864Multiple Sequence AlignmentXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780048121620SE +/- 0.12, N = 6SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 6SE +/- 0.10, N = 6SE +/- 0.13, N = 6SE +/- 0.12, N = 6SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 6SE +/- 0.09, N = 6SE +/- 0.07, N = 6SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 6SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 6SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 6SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 6SE +/- 0.33, N = 6SE +/- 0.32, N = 6SE +/- 0.14, N = 35.643.654.265.736.275.997.2514.7814.769.114.395.923.974.883.685.425.366.325.856.935.717.8510.4513.8410.4011.961. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterTimed MAFFT Alignment 6.864Multiple Sequence AlignmentXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-780048121620Min: 5.3 / Avg: 5.64 / Max: 5.94Min: 3.62 / Avg: 3.65 / Max: 3.69Min: 4.14 / Avg: 4.26 / Max: 4.5Min: 5.45 / Avg: 5.73 / Max: 5.99Min: 5.87 / Avg: 6.27 / Max: 6.53Min: 5.78 / Avg: 5.99 / Max: 6.38Min: 7.22 / Avg: 7.25 / Max: 7.27Min: 14.73 / Avg: 14.78 / Max: 14.83Min: 14.68 / Avg: 14.76 / Max: 14.8Min: 8.88 / Avg: 9.11 / Max: 9.26Min: 4.34 / Avg: 4.39 / Max: 4.48Min: 5.83 / Avg: 5.92 / Max: 5.98Min: 3.53 / Avg: 3.97 / Max: 4.51Min: 4.73 / Avg: 4.88 / Max: 5.3Min: 3.49 / Avg: 3.68 / Max: 3.91Min: 5.36 / Avg: 5.42 / Max: 5.47Min: 5.16 / Avg: 5.36 / Max: 5.76Min: 6.2 / Avg: 6.32 / Max: 6.57Min: 5.38 / Avg: 5.85 / Max: 6.42Min: 6.9 / Avg: 6.93 / Max: 6.99Min: 5.15 / Avg: 5.71 / Max: 6.12Min: 7.83 / Avg: 7.85 / Max: 7.86Min: 9.65 / Avg: 10.45 / Max: 10.64Min: 12.84 / Avg: 13.84 / Max: 14.67Min: 9.49 / Avg: 10.4 / Max: 11.53Min: 11.7 / Avg: 11.96 / Max: 12.171. (CC) gcc options: -O3 -lm -lpthread\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78002004006008001000SE +/- 0.21, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.22, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 3SE +/- 1.31, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.59, N = 3SE +/- 0.09, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.78, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.13, N = 3SE +/- 1.93, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.57, N = 3SE +/- 0.30, N = 3SE +/- 5.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.86, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3245.3582.3995.15160.28217.13223.34258.67890.38892.29442.10162.36211.52107.19154.42199.36143.15203.35208.84246.20322.61400.13226.21354.52440.27633.77397.52446.421. (CXX) g++ options:\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterRodinia 2.4Test: OpenMP LavaMDXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHJohns Ryzen 5 2400GFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-7800160320480640800Min: 244.97 / Avg: 245.35 / Max: 245.68Min: 82.3 / Avg: 82.39 / Max: 82.45Min: 95.05 / Avg: 95.15 / Max: 95.3Min: 160.14 / Avg: 160.28 / Max: 160.56Min: 216.81 / Avg: 217.13 / Max: 217.71Min: 222.92 / Avg: 223.34 / Max: 223.63Min: 258.23 / Avg: 258.67 / Max: 259.08Min: 889.82 / Avg: 890.38 / Max: 891.04Min: 890.89 / Avg: 892.29 / Max: 894.9Min: 441.95 / Avg: 442.1 / Max: 442.33Min: 161.29 / Avg: 162.36 / Max: 163.33Min: 211.41 / Avg: 211.52 / Max: 211.69Min: 107.06 / Avg: 107.19 / Max: 107.34Min: 153.23 / Avg: 154.42 / Max: 155.9Min: 199.31 / Avg: 199.36 / Max: 199.42Min: 143.09 / Avg: 143.15 / Max: 143.25Min: 203.28 / Avg: 203.35 / Max: 203.49Min: 208.78 / Avg: 208.84 / Max: 208.9Min: 246.04 / Avg: 246.2 / Max: 246.32Min: 322.45 / Avg: 322.61 / Max: 322.87Min: 396.27 / Avg: 400.13 / Max: 402.09Min: 226.15 / Avg: 226.21 / Max: 226.24Min: 353.5 / Avg: 354.52 / Max: 355.47Min: 439.7 / Avg: 440.27 / Max: 440.71Min: 627.18 / Avg: 633.77 / Max: 644.29Min: 396.59 / Avg: 397.52 / Max: 399.23Min: 446.06 / Avg: 446.42 / Max: 446.751. (CXX) g++ options:\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP CUTCPXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78001122334455SE +/- 0.25, N = 5SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.20, N = 3SE +/- 0.06, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 317.065.586.4911.3415.6415.0317.3641.8241.8016.907.0810.1312.999.4713.4613.8216.2115.8017.8214.9522.8730.5149.7031.6035.731. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -ffast-math -fopenmp\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterParboil 2.5Test: OpenMP CUTCPXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130Athlon II 630A10-7870KA10-78001020304050Min: 16.12 / Avg: 17.06 / Max: 17.6Min: 5.57 / Avg: 5.58 / Max: 5.6Min: 6.44 / Avg: 6.49 / Max: 6.51Min: 11.29 / Avg: 11.34 / Max: 11.42Min: 15.52 / Avg: 15.64 / Max: 15.71Min: 15 / Avg: 15.03 / Max: 15.04Min: 17.28 / Avg: 17.36 / Max: 17.41Min: 41.79 / Avg: 41.82 / Max: 41.84Min: 41.75 / Avg: 41.8 / Max: 41.87Min: 16.86 / Avg: 16.9 / Max: 16.99Min: 7.07 / Avg: 7.08 / Max: 7.1Min: 10.03 / Avg: 10.13 / Max: 10.33Min: 12.85 / Avg: 12.99 / Max: 13.08Min: 9.46 / Avg: 9.47 / Max: 9.48Min: 13.43 / Avg: 13.46 / Max: 13.48Min: 13.81 / Avg: 13.82 / Max: 13.83Min: 16.19 / Avg: 16.21 / Max: 16.22Min: 15.78 / Avg: 15.8 / Max: 15.84Min: 17.79 / Avg: 17.82 / Max: 17.86Min: 14.94 / Avg: 14.95 / Max: 14.95Min: 22.57 / Avg: 22.87 / Max: 23.05Min: 30.37 / Avg: 30.51 / Max: 30.6Min: 49.46 / Avg: 49.7 / Max: 50.11Min: 31.49 / Avg: 31.6 / Max: 31.69Min: 35.68 / Avg: 35.73 / Max: 35.761. (CXX) g++ options: -lm -lpthread -lgomp -ffast-math -fopenmp\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: EP.CXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-7800120240360480600SE +/- 2.08, N = 3SE +/- 1.24, N = 3SE +/- 7.05, N = 3SE +/- 1.66, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3SE +/- 0.05, N = 3SE +/- 0.38, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 2.04, N = 3SE +/- 1.92, N = 3SE +/- 2.53, N = 3SE +/- 1.89, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.23, N = 3SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.12, N = 3SE +/- 0.29, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.83, N = 3SE +/- 0.91, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 3SE +/- 0.84, N = 3275.85571.10489.65293.90144.02141.62122.0072.1372.26106.00221.13577.05394.63331.54321.50225.62219.61185.67198.48180.13202.48175.07143.5192.0583.111. Open MPI 2.1.1\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTotal Mop/s, More Is BetterNAS Parallel Benchmarks 3.3Test / Class: EP.CXeon E3-1275L v3 /w Performance ScalingRyzen 7 1800XRyzen 7 1700Ryzen 5 2400GRyzen 3 2200GRyzen 3 1300XRyzen 3 1200Pentium G3220T /w Performance ScalingPentium G3220TOptiplex-390-i5-2320-ARCHFX-8350Core i7 8700KCore i7 7740XCore i7 4770KCore i5 8400Core i5 7600KCore i5 6600KCore i5 6500Core i5 4670Core i5 3470Core i3 8100Core i3 7100Core i3 4130A10-7870KA10-7800100200300400500Min: 272.06 / Avg: 275.85 / Max: 279.25Min: 569.86 / Avg: 571.1 / Max: 573.58Min: 476.39 / Avg: 489.65 / Max: 500.41Min: 290.67 / Avg: 293.9 / Max: 296.16Min: 143.63 / Avg: 144.02 / Max: 144.47Min: 141.53 / Avg: 141.62 / Max: 141.7Min: 121.4 / Avg: 122 / Max: 122.7Min: 71.86 / Avg: 72.13 / Max: 72.33Min: 71.96 / Avg: 72.26 / Max: 72.43Min: 105.56 / Avg: 106 / Max: 106.41Min: 217.05 / Avg: 221.13 / Max: 223.38Min: 573.79 / Avg: 577.05 / Max: 580.43Min: 391.56 / Avg: 394.63 / Max: 399.65Min: 327.77 / Avg: 331.54 / Max: 333.52Min: 321.32 / Avg: 321.5 / Max: 321.82Min: 225.18 / Avg: 225.62 / Max: 225.95Min: 219.37 / Avg: 219.61 / Max: 219.92Min: 185.44 / Avg: 185.67 / Max: 185.81Min: 198.07 / Avg: 198.48 / Max: 199.03Min: 179.39 / Avg: 180.13 / Max: 180.81Min: 201.9 / Avg: 202.48 / Max: 203.01Min: 173.79 / Avg: 175.07 / Max: 176.64Min: 142.39 / Avg: 143.51 / Max: 145.3Min: 91.7 / Avg: 92.05 / Max: 92.23Min: 82.22 / Avg: 83.11 / Max: 84.791. Open MPI 2.1.1


Francielle Morandi (fran_fnb) on Pinterest\nSucculent DrawingsSucculent TattooBotanical Line DrawingFlower Line DrawingsTattoo DrawingsDrawings OfTattoosSucculent CuttingsWatercolour Pencil ArtDrawing FlowersWatercolor PaintingColouring PencilsMake ArtPrintedStill Life DrawingGardeningTo DrawPlant NurserySucculentsArtworksRecyclingArtistMandalasModern HousesFor The HomeGraphic ArtChartsBotanyFedorasWatercolor FashionForward\nHer art and illustrations have been widely published.\nLoucos são os que mantêm relacionamentos ruins por medo de solidão.\nRetro VintageInspiration QuotesInspire QuotesSmile ThoughtsRandom ThoughtsPostsLife PhilosophyShakespeareFact QuotesVintage HeartVintage ImagesThoughtsMy FeelingsOn My OwnCompound WordsImpact QuotesYou Are LovedCute IllustrationSad SayingsTextsBookInspring QuotesMessagesInspiring QuotesInspirational Quotes AboutInspirational QuotesMotivation QuotesInspiring WordsQuotes InspirationalForward\nGostaria q essa moda voltasse!


Maria Albene Silveira (benitanoturna) on Pinterest\nRio de Janeiro - Brasil / Ando devagar porque já tive pressa e trago este sorriso, porque já chorei demais!\nMore ideas from Maria Albene\nPaleo FoodVegetarian FoodHealthy FoodLightingTvLactoseBread CakeTortillaGourmetSweet Like CandyBox LunchesButtermilk PancakesBaby CakesNoodleGluten Free RecipesCandy RecipesDelicious FoodVeggie FoodFood ItemsDukan DietDietsVegansGlobesEasy BreadBread ShopPastriesGentlenessHealthyRecipiesBun CakeForward\nChurrosDanielle NoceWafflesPancakesCrepesPretzelInternetBuffetDelicious FoodMexican CandyBrown SugarVanillaButterEasy Keto RecipesDecorating CakesCinnamon TeaChowdersBenchesChocolate BarsDrip TipWaffle DessertsGriddle CakesPancakeYummy FoodWaffleBuffetsSideboardForward\nWaffle Churros com Doce de Leite\nCake Recipes Without EggsCakes Without ButterCupcakes Without EggsCookie Recipes Without ButterBaking Without ButterBaking Without EggsVanilla Cake Without MilkBrownies Without ButterCake Recipes From ScratchFilled CupcakesGluten Free SconesTailgate DessertsCouscousFiesta CupcakesCup CakesFood RecipesVanillaEgg As FoodHomemade Cupcake RecipesDesertsDiet MealsCake RecipesPastriesDrinksGluten Free RecipesBeesBiscuitTips And TricksGood FoodHealthyForward\nGrey BikiniBikini SetBikini TopsCrochet BikiniCrochet Tops2016 Summer FashionCroppedLe DosPor FavorBandeau BraCrochet Strappy TopsCrochet Smock TopsCrochet DressesBikinisBeachwear FashionBeachesWomen Bathing SuitsCrochet TopHand SpinningFavorsBudgetBeach FashionFastenersSwimming SuitsBikiniForward\n2016 Summer Fashion Womens Swimwear Crochet Bikini Womens Top Bikini Top Adjustable ties on the neck and back.\nCrochet Lace TopsCrochet TunicCotton CrochetCrochet Summer TopsVintage CrochetDiy CrochetCrochet IdeasCrochet PatternsCrochet ClothesWedding BouquetsCrochet Smock TopsCrochet SkirtsWhite BlousesCrochet Strappy TopsCocoaCraftsCrochet TopsCrochet SweatersCrochet StitchesChemisesCrop TopsWomen'sTopsWoolCatsTemplatesPhoto IllustrationFloralIdeasCrochet ChartForward\nCrochet TopsEasy Crochet ShrugBlack Crochet TopKnit CrochetFree CrochetCrochet DiagramCrochet Lace EdgingPatron CrochetCrochet Summer TopsCrochet Smock TopsCrochet SkirtsCrochet DressesLoose DressesCrochet StitchesBlack BlouseCrocheting PatternsCrochet PatternCrochet CardiganBlouse PatternsCrochet Free PatternsCrochet IdeasWedding ShawlSmokey Eye MakeupKnitted SlippersCrochet ClothesScarfsDiy CrochetTunicsKnitting And CrochetingCrochet SymbolsForward\nCrochet Dress GirlCrochet ClothesCrochet BlouseCrochet SweatersCrochet TopsCrochet JacketCrochet WomanCrochet Summer TopsCrochet Baby DressesCrochet Smock TopsCrochet Strappy TopsCrochet DressesCrocheting PatternsShearling VestCrochet EdgingsTanksCrochet LaceCrochet NecklaceJacketsLong BlouseCrochet VestsPetite Crop TopsWhite TopsCrochet ChartScarvesTunicsHoodsDress SkirtEnvyLace CardiganForward\nCrochet ShrugsCrochet BlouseCrochet TopsKnit CrochetCrochet ShawlCrochet StitchesEmsCrochet IdeasCrochet CraftsSpecial FriendsBooties CrochetWristletsLaceBobby PinsPonchosFairy Garden HousesThe WorldCrochet ChartCaptain HookTunicsDress ShirtForksKnitting And CrochetingHand CraftsClothesFilet CrochetTricot CrochetCrochet StitchCross StitchesCrochet ScarfsForward


Pop! Cristal Oscuro - Jen - Funko Pop! Vinyl de Cristal Oscuro originales y baratos.


Stroke Caregivers in South Otselic, NY - Home Care\nStroke Caregivers in South Otselic - 17 caregivers found\nCareLinx has 17 highly qualified Stroke caregivers in South Otselic, NY. Join us, and find the perfect Stroke caregiver for your loved ones today.\n17 South Otselic Caregivers found\nSkills & Certifications: Arthritis, Home Health Care, Stroke, Diabetes, Depression, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease


Steatsboskbehear siket om jild | Omrop Fryslân (advertinsje)\nSteatsboskbehear siket om jild 30 apr 2014 - 12:12\n0 reaksjes Nederlands Steatsboskbehear siket om jild\nHerman Brink fan Steatsboskbehear\nIt ûnderhâld fan picknickbankjes, fyts- en kuierpaden yn de natuer troch Steatsboskbehear bliuwt in probleem. Ek no't de provinsje dit jier 7,4 miljoen euro oermakket nei de natuerbehearder. De tekoarten ûntsteane trochdat it Ryk it behear fan de natuer oerdien hat oan de provinsjes, mar dêrby net it jild dien hat om de rekreative foarsjennings yn de natuer te ûnderhâlden. De provinsje is net fan doel dy tekoarten oan te foljen. Wol is foar elke bunder natuer 30 euro beskikber om de foarsjennings te ûnderhâlden, mar dat is noch te min.\nSteatsboskbehear siket fierder om jild. Dêrfoar wurdt oerlein mei alle oerheden, mar der wurdt ek sjoen nei rekreaasjebedriuwen dy't profitearje fan de foarsjennings yn natuergebieten.\nKorreksje meldeLês foarTrefwurden: SteatsboskbehearnatuerView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 30-04Bysûndere rit foar pasjinten 30-04Gjin keapsnein yn Drachten Besjoch ek...\nTwa Fryske amateurfotografen nominearre foar priis WNF 18 okt 2016 - 13:54 De Fryske amateurfotografen Noortje Russel fan Boyl en Anja Brouwer fan Dokkum binne nominearre foar de Frans Lanting Award, de grutste... Utkyktoer Rottumerplaat wurdt ôfbrutsen 17 okt 2016 - 13:01 De útkykpost op Rottumerplaat wurdt de kommende wike ôfbrutsen. De houten toer is troch de waarsomstannichheden en swammen sa oantaast, dat dizze... Steatsboskbehear bestriidt watercrassula mei seewetter 14 okt 2016 - 12:27 De dúnfallei op Skylge dy't ûnder wetter set wie, wurdt nochris in kear folpompt mei seewetter. Steatsboskbehear lit dat dwaan om it agressyf... Boskwachter is hieltyd faker konfliktbemiddeler 27 sep 2016 - 20:55 It wurdt hieltyd drokker yn de bosken. En de minsken dy't der komme, wurde ek hieltyd brutaler. Dat seit boskwachter Roel Vriesema fan... (advertinsje)


Costaz AFSS Arabic شبح\nCostaz AFSS French fantôme\nHow to cite this entry? Sebastian P. Brock & George A. Kiraz, Gorgias Concise Syriac-English, English-Syriac Dictionary (Piscataway, NJ: Gorgias Press, 2015) ܥܕܝܬܐ [from sedra.bethmardutho.org, accessed on Oct. 28, 2021].\nfantôme phantom شبح\nHow to cite this entry? Louis Costaz, S. J., Dictionnaire Syriaque-Français / Syriac-English Dictionary / قاموس سرياني عربي (Beirut: Dar al-Machreq; transcribed into tables by the American Foundation for Syriac Studies, NJ) ܥܕܝܬܐ [from sedra.bethmardutho.org, accessed on Oct. 28, 2021].


Akkad (stÃªd) - Wikipedy\nIn kaart mei yn brÃºn it Akkadyske Ryk en mei giele pylken de rjochtings werjÃ»n wÃªryn't dat him Ãºtwreide.\nAkkad (Akkadysk: ð’€€ð’‚µð’‰ˆð’† , A-ga-dÃ¨ki3; SÃ»mearysk: ð’Œµð’† , URIKI) wie in stÃªd yn 'e Aldheid fan Mesopotaamje en teffens de krite om dy stÃªd hinne. It lei yn it noardlike part fan wat no Irak is, mar de krekte lokaasje is Ã»nbekend. Der binne ferskate ruÃ¯nestÃªden dy't Akkad west hawwe kinne soene; dy lizze foar it meastepart oan 'e eastkant fan 'e rivier de Tigris, tusken de moderne stÃªden Samarra en Bagdad yn. Akkad wie de haadstÃªd fan it dernei ferneamde Akkadyske Ryk, dat fan 'e fjouwerentweintichste iuw f.Kr. oant de twaentweintichste iuw f.Kr. 150 jier lang it Midden-Easten behearske.\n1 Skriftlike boarnen\nSkriftlike boarnen[bewurkje seksje | boarne bewurkje]\nFoarÃ´fgeande oan 'e Ã»ntsifering fan it spikerskrift yn 'e njoggentjinde iuw wie Akkad allinne mar bekend fan ien inkele ferwizing yn it bibelboek Genesis 10:10, dÃªr't it yn 'e oarspronklike tekst skreaun is as ×�Ö·×›Ö·Ö¼×“ (â€™Akkad). De kontekst is dÃªr in list fan stÃªden fan Nimrod yn SÃ»mearje.\nSaakkundigen Walther Sallaberger en Aage Westenholz stelden yn 1999 yn harren wurk Mesopotamien: Akkade-Zeit und Ur III-Zeit fÃªst dat de stÃªd Akkad ynsafier bekend 160 kear neamd wurdt yn it korpus fan teksten yn spikerskrift. DÃªrby giet it om boarnen dy't kwa datum Ãºtinoar rinne fan it Aldakkadyske Tiidrek sels oant de Nijbabyloanyske perioade healwei it earste milennium f.Kr. It toponym wurdt yn it SÃ»mearysk logografysk stavere as ð’Œµð’† (URIKI) of yn it Akkadysk (en letter it Assyrysk en Babyloanysk) fonetysk as ð’€€ð’‚µð’‰ˆð’† (A-ga-dÃ¨ki3).\nDe etymology fan 'e namme is Ã»ndÃºdlik, mar yn elts gefal net fan Akkadyske (d.w.s. Semityske) oarsprong. Saakkundigen hawwe datoangeande ferskate suggestjes dien, dy't foar AgadÃ¨ in SÃ»mearysk, Hoerritysk of LÃ»llÃ»bysk komÃ´f sykje. De net-Akkadyske oarsprong fan it toponym suggerearret dat it plak al bewenne wie doe't de Akkaadjers harren der yn pre-sargoanyske tiden foar it earste nei wenjen setten. Op it bestean fan 'e stÃªd foarÃ´fgeande oan it regear fan Sargon de Grutte wiist ek ien oerlevere pre-sargoanyske jiernamme. Oare histoaryske teksten lykje lykwols te suggerearjen dat Sargon de stÃªd sels stifte hawwe soe.\nAgade-ki ("LÃ¢n fan Akkad") op in sylindersegel fan kening Sjar-Kali-Sjarri.\nGoaden[bewurkje seksje | boarne bewurkje]\nDe wichtichste godheid dy't yn Akkad fereare waard, wie (de Eastsemityske) Isjtar, dy't oerienkomt mei de SÃ»mearyske Inanna en de Westsemityske Astarte. Hja waard yn Akkad oantsjut as â€˜AÅ¡tar-annunÄ«tum, "Oarlochssuchtige Isjtar". Har oarehelte Ilaba waard ek yn Akkad fereare. Dy beide goaden waarden yn 'e Aldbabyloanyske perioade fereare yn Sippar, mooglik om't Akkad doe al ferwoastge wie. Tsjin 'e midden fan it earste milennium f.Kr. wiene fan 'e stÃªd mei wissichheid inkeld noch ruÃ¯nes oer.\nDe lokaasje fan Akkad is ferlern gien, hoewol't bekend is dat de stÃªd yn noardlik Mesopotaamje lei. In protte iere foarstellen oangeande de lokaasje woene de stÃªd oan 'e igge fan 'e rivier de Eufraat hawwe, mar sÃ»nt de 1990-er jierren bestiet der in wittenskiplike konsensus dat in lokaasje oan 'e rivier de Tigris wierskynliker is. Op basis fan in oerlevere reisskema Ãºt 'e Aldbabyloanyske Tiid, dat fÃ»n is yn 'e ruÃ¯nes fan Mari, soe Akkad oan 'e Tigris lizze moatte, justjes sÃºdlik fan 'e moderne stÃªd Bagdad (dy't pas yn 'e Iere Midsiuwen stifte waard).\nDe identifikaasje fan Akkad mei Sippar-Amnanum (Sippar Å¡a AnnunÄ«tum), it moderne Tell ed-Der oan in yrrigaasjekanaal foar it eigentlike Sippar (Sippar Å¡a Å amaÅ¡) oer, waard yn 1928 Ã´fwiisd troch Eckhard Unger op basis fan in Nijbabyloanyske list Ãºt 'e sechsde iuw f.Kr. dy't Sippar-Amnanum en Akkad as ferskillende plakken opneamt. Yn 1975 sloech Harvey Weiss foar dat it histoaryske Akkad wolris Isjan Mizjad wÃªze koe, in grut argeologysk fynplak op 5 km Ã´fstÃ¢n fan Kisj. Lettere argeologyske opgravings op dat plak hawwe lykwols Ãºtwiisd fat Isjan Mizjad datearret Ãºt 'e tiid fan 'e TrÃªde Dynasty fan Oer, dy't nei de ynstoarting fan it Akkadyske Ryk yn 'e twaentweintichste iuw f.Kr. opkaam.\nSÃ»nt de 1990-er jierren hat it debat oer de lokaasje fan Akkad him taspitst op plakken oan 'e eastigge fan 'e Tigris. Yn 1990 suggerearre Christophe Wall-Romana as de wierskynlikste lokaasje de krite om 'e gearfloeiÃ¯ng hinne fan 'e rivier de Dijala mei de Trigris, en mear spesifyk Tell Muhammad, yn 'e sÃºdeastlike foarstÃªden fan Bagdad. Hy joech ta dat dÃªr gjin oerbliuwsels fan 'e Ã¢lde stÃªd fÃ»n binne, mar wiet dat oan 'e oerbouwing fan it plak mei moderne huzebou. Sallaberger en Westenholz suggerearren yn 1999 in lokaasje deunby de gearfloeiÃ¯ng fan 'e rivier de Adaim mei de Tigris, eastlik fan Samarra, deunby DÃ»lÃ»ja. Julian Reade tocht yn 2002 ek oan in plak yn dy omkriten, mar by Kadisija, op basis fan 'e fragminten fan in Akkadysk stÃ¢nbyld dy't dÃªr opdobbe wiene (no te sjen yn it Britsk Museum te Londen). Datselde plak wie yn 1923 om deselde reden ek al troch W.H. Lane foarsteld as de lokaasje fan Akkad.\nSargon de Grutte\nFoar boarnen en oare literatuer, sjoch Ã»nder: References en Sources, op dizze side.\nOpfrege fan "https://fy.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Akkad_(stÃªd)&oldid=1035009"\nFerlern plak Ãºt de Aldheid\nEarder plak yn Irak\nDizze side is it lÃªst bewurke op 18 mrt 2021 om 23.51.\nDe tekst is beskikber Ã»nder de lisinsje Creative Commons Nammefermelding-Lyk diele; der kinne oanfoljende betingsten fan tapassing wÃªze. Sjoch de GebrÃ»ksbetingsten foar mear ynformaasje.


Plysje trapearret koperdieven | Omrop Fryslân (advertinsje)\nPlysje trapearret koperdieven 16 aug 2010 - 11:07\n0 reaksjes De plysje op De Jouwer hat sneintenacht twa manlju oanholden op fertinking fan stellerij fan ûnder oare koper út in gebou oan de Produksjewei. De twa fertochten, in Gordykster (17) en in man (30) mei ûnbekend wenplak, waarden nei in melding opwachte troch de plysje. Dy hawwe de auto fan de manlju efkes folge en binne doe oergien ta oanhâlding. Op de achterbank stiene rollen koper, twa akku's en it nedige ark.\nKorreksje meldeLês foarTrefwurden: argyfView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 16-08Honkbalsters slim skrokken 16-08Jonkje (3) ferwûne by ûngelok Besjoch ek...


Reusable swivel hose ends - 180 Graden-AN4 kopen? Chargertech levert direct uit voorraad.\nReusable swivel hose ends - 180 Graden-AN4


Iii. Net-tarifmethoden fan steatregulearring fan bûtenlânske ekonomyske aktiviteit. - Studios\nDer binne in oantal manieren om non-tarifyske maatregels te klassifisearjen dy't ûntwikkele binne ûnder de GATT / WTO:\n1. Finansjeel metoaden fan beheiningen binne yn 'e meganisaasje fan betellingen yn' e foarm fan direkte en yndirekte fergoedingen fêstlein, oerienkomsten oer reagekosten dy't oansletten binne mei de beslissings, organisatoaryske en ekonomyske problemen, op kosten fan bûtenlânske leveransiers:\n1) Sliepende gebieten binne ekstra betellingen dy't bedoeld binne om de wrâldmerkpriis te fertsjinjen om se tichter by de ynterne prizen te bringen.\nBestjoersrjochtregistyk befet de opsammeling fan 'e fergoedingen yn' e tiid fan beweging fan bûtenlânske hannelsgoaden troch de maatregels en yndrukken\n2) Ynwenners (lykweardige) belestingen en fergoedingen binne lykwichtlik yndirekt mei yndirekte belestingen en dutsen (VAT en beskaat belestingen), op 'e binnenmarkt fan it lân fan ymportearjen. Har doel is om deselde belestingregeling foar deselde ferlykbere soarten fan bûtenlânske en nasjonale produksje te kreëarjen, en ek in bepaald nivo fan prizen op 'e binnenmarkt te hâlden.\n3) Oanfoljende opbringsten binne de opdracht fan ympuls dy't ynnommen wurde oer tafoegings fan belestingen en belestingen dy't gjin ynterne tsjinpartij hawwe en binne bedoeld om bestimmingen fan aktiviteiten yn relaasje mei bûtenlânske hannel te finen (belesting foar bûtenlânske muntenferfieringen, .\n4) ymposysje binne ymplemintaasje foar de foarútbûn fan 'e kosten fan ymportearje en beteljen fan ymportbelesting yn' e foarm fan iepenbiere ymportearingen, beteljen fan cash, foar beteljen fan bedragen, ensfh.\n2. Eksport subsydzje of produksje subsydzje:\n1) De subsydzje eksport is in subsydzje foar de fabrikant of de ferkeaper fan 'e eksportguod, in part fan' e kosten fan produksje of ferlies fergoedigje om de konkurrinsjefermogen fan 'e saak op' e binnenmarkt te fergrutsjen.\n2) Ynterne subsydzje is it direkte budzjetfinansiering fan produksje binnen it lân fan guod.\n3) Ryksbeskikking - de steat en it bedriuw kiezen inkele soarten soarten karje allinich út nasjonale bedriuwen, sels as dizze soart djoerder binne as ymportearre.\n3. Quantitative beheiningen op eksporten en ymporten:\n1) It petearjen is in maatregel fan 'e operative regeling fan bûtenlânske ekonomyske ferhâldingen fan' e steat, omtroch kwantitative en kosten beheinen op it ymportearjen of eksport fan guod yn it lân.\n2) Faksingenisaasje - steatregulearring fan bûtenlânske hannel troch de fêstiging fan sintralisearre eksportbehear oer it ymportearjen of eksportearjen fan guod, binnen spesifike quotas, foar in bepaalde perioade. Hannelje yn guod yn 'e fêststelde kontinginten wurdt ûnder lienzjes útfierd.\n3) ylleging - regeling ymportearje troch de foechhawwende steatorganen fan eksport fan guod út it lân, troch útjaan fan spesjale fergunningen (fergunnings) neffens de ferklearring fan be>\n4) Frijwillige eksportrjochtings\n5) De easken foar it ûnderhâld fan lokale komponinten - de metoade fan it hannelsbelied fan 'e steat, dy't wetlik it diel fan it definitive produkt foarme troch produkten fan produkten, as dat sa'n produkt foar it ferkeapjen is op' e binnenmarkt.\n4. Technyske standerts en easken foar ymporteare produkten dy't ferbân hâlde mei soarch, normen en feilichheid (ynklusyf bedriuwsnormen, easken foar ferpakking en markearring fan guod, sanitêre en veterinary standards).\n5. Oanfurdigens fan maatregels en bestjoerlike ymportaazjes - wetlike ferplichtingsferplichtingen sûnder de folsleine ferfier, wittenskip en oare artikels net troch de maatregels oertsjinne wurde. Oanfollingsfoarmen binne:\n1) ynspeksje fan guod en oare artikels\n3) ferifikaasje en útfiering fan dokuminten\n4) bepalingen fan it lân fan komôf fan guod\n5) berekkening en samling fan saken en fergoedingen\n; Datum tafoege: 2015-06-26 ; ; Views: 539 ; Is it publisearre materiaal it urheberrecht? | | Persoanlike data beskerming | ORDER WORK\nI. EXTRAKT FAN DE STAATFOARINGE STANDARD fan 'e hegere profesjonele educatie, SPECIALTY - LAW, QUALIFIKATION - LAWYER\nI. Methods foar symptomatyske psychotherapy\nIi. Kunde en tarifmethoden fan steatregulearring fan bûtenlânske ekonomyske aktiviteit\nII. BASIC METHODEN EN DEVICES foar registraasje fan Ionisearjende rasseminten.\nIv. Biogetyske metoaden dy't bydrage oan ferheging fan ferwachting fan 'e libben\nIv. FERKMAILS FERDIERSKONTROLLE ON DISCIPLINE "BASIS FOAR FOREIGN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY"


Pre-Owned 2020 Dodge Durango GT 4D Sport Utility in Brooklyn #LC114574 | Brooklyn Mitsubishi meta name="geography" content="Brooklyn, NY 11203" />\nCARFAX One-Owner. Clean CARFAX. BROOKLYN MITSUBISHI IS THE NUMBER ONE MITSUBISHI DEALER IN THE TRI-STATE AREA!!!, AWD. 2020 Dodge Durango GT AWD Gray Clearcoat Odometer is 3083 miles below market average!


Quickly Barn Door Style Kitchen Cabinets Http Bukuweb Net Pinterest | Moncleroutletstoreonline barn style kitchen cabinets door plans. kitchen cabinets door rollers barn door style. barn door style kitchen cabinets.\nHome » Home Interior » Barn Door Style Kitchen Cabinets » Quickly Barn Door Style Kitchen Cabinets Http Bukuweb Net Pinterest


Spul op Bedriuwekontaktdagen | Omrop Fryslân Skip to main content\nSpul op Bedriuwekontaktdagen 21 mrt 2012 - 10:20\n0 reaksjes In man (50) út Warten en in man (52) út Ljouwert binne tiisdei oanhâlden foar mishanneling. In oare man út Warten kaam op de Bedriuwekontaktdagen de Ljouwerter tsjin dêr't er in saaklik konflikt mei hie. Se krigen wurden en de man út Warten krige in kopstjit en rekke ferwûne. Syn plakgenoat bemuoide him der mei en joech de Ljouwerter in klap yn it gesicht. Beide fertochten binne meinommen nei it buro foar ferhoar.\nKorreksje meldeLês foarTrefwurden: LjouwertspulbedriuwekontaktdagenView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 21-03Auto's skansearre by ûngelok 21-03Frou mei scootmobyl yn wetter Besjoch ek...


Billeder af Wyk Auf Föhr - Udvalgte billeder af Wyk Auf Föhr, Foehr - TripAdvisor\nWyk Auf Föhr VIST FOR NYLIG Der blev ikke fundet nogen resultater OPRET PROFILnærSøg Om Wyk Auf FöhrHotellerRestauranterForslag til aktiviteterFlyrejserFlyselskaberDet bedste i 2017SupportcenterLog på Tilmeld dig Mine rejser Bookinger Gennemse\nBilleder af Wyk Auf Föhr - Udvalgte billeder\nEuropa Tyskland Slesvig-Holsten North Friesian Islands Foehr Wyk Auf Föhr Wyk Auf Föhr-billeder\nWyk Auf Föhr: Billeder Filtrér billeder efter Alle (585)\nStrand von Wyk (Hoevel, aug. 2010)\nAUTOFÄHRE WYK AUF FÖHR (HOPPER030, mar. 2010)\nmoi druzi - vivci))) (Olia_Boychuk, mar. 2010)\nBank..gy gy...)) (Olia_Boychuk, mar. 2010)\nBillede af Wyk Auf Föhr, Foehr (SandraP5, feb. 2010)\nBillede af Wyk Auf Föhr, Foehr (TomGre, nov. 2009)\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Inselhotel Arfsten\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Hotel Gregory\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Duus Hotel Garni\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Strandhotel\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Pension Ruh Ut\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Mere Alt Wyk\nWyk Auf Föhr, Foehr Mindre Alle hoteller i Wyk Auf Föhr


Liskeard | THE GAY UK Listings, Cruising Sites, LGBT Bars and Venues\nWelcome to Gay Liskeard Listings. You can find the latest and most up-to-date listings for LGBT venues, spaces, events and dating.\nLiskeard Gay Chat\nLiskeard, Cornwall, England, United Kingdom


Toaster Oven With Broiler 6 Slice Convection Toaster Oven Countertop Stainless Steel Large Capacity For 12 Inch Pizza With Bakeware Pan Broiler Rack Rhto 17001 Cuisinart Deluxe Convection Toaster Oven Broiler Sur La Table – taxnote.info\nToaster Oven With Broiler 6 Slice Convection Toaster Oven Countertop Stainless Steel Large Capacity For 12 Inch Pizza With Bakeware Pan Broiler Rack Rhto 17001 Cuisinart Deluxe Convection Toaster Oven Broiler Sur La Table\ntoaster oven with broiler 6 slice convection toaster oven countertop stainless steel large capacity for 12 inch pizza with bakeware pan broiler rack rhto 17001 cuisinart deluxe convection toaster oven broiler sur la table.\ncuisinart convection toaster oven broiler reviews crate and barrel , toaster oven made in usa toaster oven made in beautiful slice toaster oven made in usa toaster oven made in beautiful slice toaster oven broiler with drip oven toaster griller usage, oster pizza toaster oven tssttvpzda target more, toaster oven broilers cuisinartcom chefs convection toaster oven, shop better chef liter toaster oven broiler free shipping on better chef liter toaster oven broiler, decembers hottest sales on maxi matic elite cuisine slice extra maxi matic elite cuisine slice extra large toaster oven broiler with rotisserie, amazoncom toaster oven slice multifunction stainless steel toaster oven slice multifunction stainless steel with timer toast bake, cuisinart broiler toaster oven black tobnbks staples httpswwwstaplespcomsis, broiler toaster ovens toasters countertop ovens the home depot slice stainless steel toaster oven broiler , granite liter toaster oven broiler multi function timer slices granite liter toaster oven broiler multi function timer slices toast ebay, cuisinart chefs convection toaster oven broiler .\nPosted on 11/19/2019 09:17:00 pm Full size toaster-oven-with-broiler-6-slice-convection-toaster-oven-countertop-stainless-steel-large-capacity-for-12-inch-pizza-with-bakeware-pan-broiler-rack-rhto-17001-cuisinart-deluxe-convection.jpg


1.STATE Camdyn Flats Women Caramel\nHome :: shoes :: Flats :: Women :: 1.STATE Camdyn Women Flats Caramel\n1.STATE Camdyn Women Flats Caramel\nComplete your daily ensemble with the 1.STATE Camdyn flats.\nFlats feature a leather upper with buckle detailing and side cutout.\nMiz Mooz Pixie Women Boots Moss\nSteve Madden Kids Wrkwrk (Little Kid/Big Kid) Girls Heels Denim\nOscar de la Renta Childrenswear Floral Romper (Toddler/Little Kids/Big Kids) Girls Jumpsuits & Rompers White Multi\nClothing Boy short-sleeved t-shirts Kaporal ELIJA Marine\nFrye Kristen Harness Short Women Boots Chestnut Soft Oiled Suede\nWhite Polka Dot Button Through Shift Dress\nShoes Men Loafers Stonefly TOWN 8 BRUSH OFF Brown\nShoes Women Sandals Refresh MINIA Black


Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download | Narutonamikaze.com\nWallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download\nWallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download is free HD wallpaper. This wallpaper was upload at August 30, 2018 upload by narutonamikaze in .\nYou can download Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download in your computer by clicking resolution image in Download by size:. Don't forget to rate and comment if you interest with this wallpaper.\nPhoto Of Gallery Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download\nDownload Hd Wallpaper Ferrari Beautiful Car Wallpapers – Auto Car from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:microclass.org\nWallpaper Free Download Car New Ferrari Cars Big Wallpapers from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:topriority.me\nCars Wallpaper Hd Download Awesome Ferrari Cars Big Wallpapers from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:topriority.me\nDownload Hd Wallpaper Ferrari Beautiful Yellow Ferrari from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:4autocar.online\nWallpaper for Desktop Car Beautiful Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:technonewstrend.co\nCar Wallpaper Hd Ferrari Fresh Ferrari Cars Hd Wallpapers Free from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:car-modification.us\nElegant Ferrari Car Models from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:chacabook.com\nThese are the Alfa Romeo Ferrari from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:mezzomotorsports.com\nWallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:microclass.org\nFerrari Background Stunning Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Best from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:cardream.us\nDownload HD Ferrari Enzo Wallpapers For Desktop Background Free from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:pinterest.com\nFerrari transportation cars GIF on GIFER by Tem from Ferrari Cars Photos Free Download , source:gifer.com\nRandom attachment Wallpapers Ferrari Car 77 Unique Farari Car Hd Wallpaper Download


NEW!! EVERYTHING IS FREE GLITCH! FREE KEYS GLITCH! Infinite Warfare Supply Drop Glitch\nWe Bring All The Best Glitch, Strategies, Hacks and Mods in Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare and Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare\nBest Of Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare\nBest Of Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare\nLIKE COMMENT AND SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE VIDEOS.\nTHANKS SO MUCH FOR 7K SUBS\nFIRE VIDEO TMR\n20 GIFTCARDS GIVEAWAY THIS MONTH\nINFINITE WARFARE KEY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE SUPPLY DROP GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE SALVAGE GLITCH,IW FREE KEY GLITCH,IW UNLIMITED SUPPLY DROPG LTICH,INFINITE WARFARE UNLIMITED KEY GLITCH,IW UNLIMITED SALVAGE GLITCH,IW KEY GLITCH,IW GLITCHES,IW SALVAGE GLITCH,IW SUPPLY DROP GLITCH,IW XP GLITCH,IW PRESTIGE MASTER GLITCH,IW BOT LOBBY GLITCH,IW GLITCHES XB1,KEY GLITCH,FREE SUPPLY DROP IW,IW GLITCHES PS4\nFREE XP GLITCH IW,INFINITE WARFARE XP GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE MASTER PRESTIGE GLITCH,IW XP GLITCH,IW UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,IW UNLIMITED XP,IW HOW TO GET UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,IW PRESTIGE MASTER GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE HOW TO GET UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,IW GLITCHES,IW GET UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,IW XP LOBBY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE PRESTIGE GLITCH,IW PRESTIGE GLITCH,MASTER PRESTIGE GLITCH,IW XP GLITCHES,\nINFINITE WARFARE BOT LOBBY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,IW BOT LOBBY GLITCH,IW UNLIMITED XP GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE HOW TO HOST A BOT LOBBY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE SOLO BOT LOBBY,INFINITE WARFARE SOLO BOT LOBBY GLITCH,IW GLITCHES,INFINITE WARFARE XP LOBBY GLITCH TUTORIAL,IW XP LOBBY GLITCH,IW SOLO BOT LOBBY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE HOW TO GET INTO A XP LOBBY,BOT LOBBY,IW,GLITCHES\nINFINITE WARFARE BLACK SKY CAMO GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE UNLOCK ALL CAMO GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE UNLOCK ANY CAMO GLITCH,IW BLACK SKY CAMO GLITCH,IW UNLOCK ANY CAMO GLITCH,IW UNLOCK ALL CAMO GLITCH,IW CAMO GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE CAMO GLITCH,IW GLITCHES,IW UNLOCK CAMO GLITCH,CALL OF DUTY GLITCH,INFINITE WARFARE GLITCHES,RVN BLACK SKY CAMO\nKingston Gaming Proudly powered by WordPress