Stroetinga wint opnij maraton | Omrop Fryslân (advertinsje)\nStroetinga wint opnij maraton 11 nov 2007 - 14:43\n0 reaksjes Dûbel sukses foar Stroetinga Arjan Stroetinga hat snein yn Utrecht de fjirde maraton foar de Essent Cup wûn. De 26-jierrige Aldeberkeapster wie nei hûndert rûntsjes de rapste yn de massasprint. Cees Juffermans waard twadde en Bob de Vries fan de Haule kaam as tredde oer de streek. De Vries bliuwt lieder fan it klassemint.\nIt wie de twadde winst yn ien wykein foar Stroetinga. Sneon wûn er ek al de maraton yn Den Haach om de KNSB Cup.\nKorreksje meldeTrefwurden: argyfLês foarView the discussion thread.Diel dit berjocht op: 11-11Wapenfynst yn Snits 11-11Jonge fan 'e fyts slein Besjoch ek...


Dictionary of Greek and Roman Geography (1854), MA´CHYNI\nEth. MA´CHYNI (Eth. Μάχυνοι,<*>), a people of Africa Propria, whom Ptolemy places S. of the Liby-phoenicians, as far as the Lesser Syrtis and the MACHLYES (Ptol. 4.3. § § 22, 26.)\nClaudius Ptolemy, Tetrabiblos , 4.3


AllHipHop EXCLUSIVE: Gucci Mane – The State vs Radric Davis 2 – “The Caged Bird Sings” | The Voice for Dj J Watts, TMMG & TMMG Dj's (www.jwattslive.com)\n← Street Warriors Vol. 2 Hosted By Dj J Watts\nHip-Hop Rumors: Ciara Is PREGNANT! →\nPosted on December 25, 2013\tby Dj J Watts & The Movement Music Group\nYoung Dolph ft. Gucci Mane, 2 Chainz, Ty Dolla $ign - Go Get Sum Mo Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dL 41 minutes ago\nHoodrich Pablo Juan Feat. Drugrixh Peso - Winter Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dL 44 minutes ago\nMACK MARLEY X BASELINE - NHC Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dL 53 minutes ago\nYoung Dolph ft. Gucci Mane, 2 Chainz, Ty Dolla $ign - Go Get Sum Mo Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dLwww.jwattslive.com\t41 minutes ago\nHoodrich Pablo Juan Feat. Drugrixh Peso - Winter Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dLwww.jwattslive.com\t44 minutes ago\nMACK MARLEY X BASELINE - NHC Now On Playing On TMMGRadio bit.ly/2zno9dLwww.jwattslive.com\t53 minutes ago


Liz Matutteame Beauty World : #InMyGarden : Adoro Fotografare i Funghi !\n#InMyGarden : Adoro Fotografare i Funghi !\nContinua la mia passione per le foto dei funghi spontanei 😍\nStanno li belli fermi e si mettono in posa 😂\nPubblicato da Liz Matutteame a 00:42\nEtichette: fungo, in my garden, inverno, magia della natura, miracolo della natura, mushroom, natural mushroom, nel mio giardino, no filter, winter


1. Mar 13, 14:32 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Gas Bandit\n14. Mar 13, 17:06 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Kedyn\n15. Mar 13, 17:17 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Wildone\n23. Mar 13, 20:10 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Rea1One\n2. Mar 13, 14:39 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center KS\n3. Mar 13, 14:44 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Kedyn\n5. Mar 13, 15:20 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center DG\n4. Mar 13, 15:18 Good move... JohnBirshire\n26. Mar 13, 21:16 Re: Good move... bigspender\n28. Mar 13, 22:20 Re: Good move... Rea1One\n6. Mar 13, 15:37 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Tumbler\n7. Mar 13, 15:53 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center sir\n8. Mar 13, 16:02 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center loomy\n9. Mar 13, 16:36 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Parias\n13. Mar 13, 17:03 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Panickd\n16. Mar 13, 17:31 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Cpmartins\n17. Mar 13, 17:44 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Panickd\n18. Mar 13, 17:48 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Parias\n20. Mar 13, 18:22 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center DangerDog\n21. Mar 13, 18:33 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center DG\n22. Mar 13, 18:56 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Asmo\n24. Mar 13, 20:18 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Panickd\n10. Mar 13, 16:42 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center JohnBirshire\n11. Mar 13, 16:58 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Cutter\n12. Mar 13, 16:58 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Cpmartins\n19. Mar 13, 17:49 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Krizzen\n25. Mar 13, 20:38 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center entr0py\n>> 27. Mar 13, 21:34 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center bigspender\n29. Mar 13, 22:37 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center theyarecomingforyou\n35. Mar 14, 13:53 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center DG\n30. Mar 13, 22:54 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Steele Johnson\n33. Mar 14, 01:49 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Crustacean Soup\n34. Mar 14, 12:45 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center Steele Johnson\n31. Mar 13, 23:33 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center theyarecomingforyou\n32. Mar 14, 00:21 Re: PlanetSide 2 Patch Adds VR Training Center entr0py


Westie Dog String Holder\nWestie Dog String Holder. 9" high. Chalkware. Very good condition - (original paint - no chips, cracks or repairs). "Click" on the photo to see an enlargement of this wonderful string holder. This string holder, like all of the other string holders we offer, is an original and not a reproduction. Please use the "Ask A Question" button to the right if you have any questions concerning this item and remember - all sales are fully guaranteed!\nItems Similar To "Westie Dog String Holder"\nVintage Puppy Dog Figurine\tGoebel Black Dog Figurine\tHand Painted DOG AND PIG MUSICIANS Bisque Porcelain Figurines\tVintage Pottery Dog Figurine with Newspaper in Mouth\tCategories


cloaca joke – RHLSTP! (RHLSTP!)\nCategory: cloaca joke


5 Battery Operated Fan O2 Cool 5 Inch Desktop Battery Operated Fan Battery Operated Clip On Fan Stylish Battery Operated Desk Fans Battery Operated Clip On Fan Double Battery Power Bank Fan Operated Clip On Mini Desk Fan Battery Operated Clip On Fan – pricesort.info\n5 Battery Operated Fan O2 Cool 5 Inch Desktop Battery Operated Fan Battery Operated Clip On Fan Stylish Battery Operated Desk Fans Battery Operated Clip On Fan Double Battery Power Bank Fan Operated Clip On Mini Desk Fan Battery Operated Clip On Fan\n5 battery operated fan o2 cool 5 inch desktop battery operated fan battery operated clip on fan stylish battery operated desk fans battery operated clip on fan double battery power bank fan operated clip on mini desk fan battery operated clip on fan.\nocool battery operated fan cool fans ocool portable battery ocool battery operated fan cool fans ocool portable battery operated desk fan ocool new battery operated fan with adapter, ocool battery operated fan new camping fan free shipping us ocool battery operated fan new camping fan free shipping us puerto rico, ocool portable speed battery operated fan pack groupon ocool portable speed battery operated fan , electric personal fans hand fans battery operated rechargeable electric personal fans hand fans battery operated rechargeable handheld mini fan hand bar desktop from kbaybolife dhgatecom, battery operated fan home depot battery operated ceiling fan battery battery operated fan home depot desk fan quite desk fan large size of office fans small battery operated fan , amazoncom bluboon clip on fan battery operated fan portable for bluboon clip on fan battery operated fan portable for baby stroller quot two batteries, battery operated fan clip on battery operated and powered fan with battery operated fan clip on battery operated and powered fan with two batteries rechargeable clip on fans mini battery operated clip fan walmart ocool , o cool battery powered fan o cool battery operated fan amazon o cool battery powered fan cool battery fan cool model indoor outdoor fan sale cool battery o cool battery powered fan , best mini desk fans reviewed in the countereviews searik clip on battery operated fan, ocool portable plus battery powered portable fan black google ocool portable plus battery powered portable fan black, buy residential fans free shipping over zorocom link to product battery or usb operated fan .\nPosted on 11/12/2019 09:27:59 pm Full size 5-battery-operated-fan-o2-cool-5-inch-desktop-battery-operated-fan-battery-operated-clip-on-fan-stylish-battery-operated-desk-fans-battery-operated-clip-on-fan-double-battery-power.jpg


4870 West JAKE Court, Pahrump, NV 89060 (MLS # 1206515)\nHome · 4870 West JAKE Court, Pahrump, NV 89060 (MLS # 1206515)\nExquisite loction at high end of west fan. Beautiful mountain view and view of entire valley.\nMar 22, '13 - May 8, '13\n4870 West JAKE Court, Pahrump, NV\nCONTACT US ABOUT 4870 WEST JAKE COURT


Certified Used - USED731- $22,595 - FREE FREIGHT !\nCertified Used - USED731- $22,595 - F...\nCOLD PLANER 48"\nHighly versatile Cold Planers are adaptable to a wide variety of job environments including road repair, bridge deck repair, landscaping, municipal, shopping center and utility work. The Cold Planer is easy to maneuver around manhole and storm drains; excellent for bridge decks where heavier, dedicated planers are not allowed. Hydraulic side-shift and depth control allows skid steer operators to shift it up to 24” for maneuvering close to buildings and other obstacles from the comfort of your seat.


Sweden | EuroBasket (2005) | FIBA EuropeFIBA EuroBasketFIBA EuroBasket WomenFIBA Europe CupEuroLeague WomenEuroCup WomenAll competitionsMen competitionsClub competitionsFIBA Europe CupNational team competitionsFIBA EuroBasketFIBA European Championship for Small CountriesHistoryEuroCup ChallengeFIBA SuproLeagueSaporta CupKorac CupEuropean Olympic Qualifying MenEuroCup All Star GameFIBA Europe Regional Challenge CupWomen competitionsClub competitionsEuroLeague WomenEuroCup WomenSuperCup WomenNational team competitionsFIBA EuroBasket WomenFIBA Women’s European Championship for Small CountriesHistoryRonchetti CupEuroLeague Women All Star GameYouth competitionsMaleFIBA U20 European ChampionshipFIBA U18 European ChampionshipFIBA U16 European ChampionshipFIBA U18 European Championship Division CFIBA U16 European Championship Division CU18 All Star GameHistoryEuropean Championship for Men 22 and UnderFemaleFIBA U20 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U18 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U16 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U18 Women’s European Championship Division CFIBA U16 Women’s European Championship Division C EuroBasket 2005All competitionsMen competitionsFIBA Europe CupFIBA EuroBasketFIBA European Championship for Small CountriesEuroCup ChallengeFIBA SuproLeagueSaporta CupKorac CupEuropean Olympic Qualifying MenEuroCup All Star GameFIBA Europe Regional Challenge CupWomen competitionsEuroLeague WomenEuroCup WomenSuperCup WomenFIBA EuroBasket WomenFIBA Women’s European Championship for Small CountriesRonchetti CupEuroLeague Women All Star GameYouth competitionsFIBA U20 European ChampionshipFIBA U18 European ChampionshipFIBA U16 European ChampionshipFIBA U18 European Championship Division CFIBA U16 European Championship Division CU18 All Star GameEuropean Championship for Men 22 and UnderFIBA U20 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U18 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U16 Women’s European ChampionshipFIBA U18 Women’s European Championship Division CFIBA U16 Women’s European Championship Division CDIVISION ADIVISION ADIVISION BFinal Round Home Standings Schedule TeamsTeam homeRosterAccumulated StatsSchedule & ResultsTeam History Players StatsPlayers - Statistical LeadersPlayers - Game HighsTeams - Statistical LeadersTeams - Game Highs Comp. System News History Cancel ENAll countriesAlbaniaAndorraArmeniaAustriaAzerbaijanBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkEnglandEstoniaThe Former Yugoslav Republic of MacedoniaFinlandFranceGeorgiaGermanyGibraltarGreat BritainGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandIsraelItalyKosovoLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaMoldovaMontenegroNetherlandsNorwayPolandPortugalPrincipality of MonacoRomaniaRussiaSan MarinoScotlandSerbiaSlovak RepublicSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTurkeyUkraineWalesDIVISION ADIVISION ADIVISION BFinal Round Home Standings Schedule TeamsTeam homeRosterAccumulated StatsSchedule & ResultsTeam History Players StatsPlayers - Statistical LeadersPlayers - Game HighsTeams - Statistical LeadersTeams - Game Highs Comp. System News HistorySwedenTeam homeRosterAccumulated StatsSchedule & ResultsTeam HistorySweden Avoid The Drop12.09.2005 - Sweden will keep their Division A status in 2007 thanks to their victory over the Netherlands in the relegation tournament on Monday night in Novi Sad.\nThe Swedes beat Poland on Sunday and kept up their good form to defeat the Netherlands 78-65 just one day later.Read moreSTATS RANKINGSPoints Per GameTotal reboundsAssistsPoints Allowed2nd72.5 PTS3rd34.0 RT2nd9.0 AS1st60.0 PTS AAssistsPoints Allowed2nd9.0 AS1st60.0 PTS APHOTO GALLERYFredrik Jonzen (Sweden)Fredrik Jonzen (Sweden)ROSTERNoNamePos.HeightBirth datePlace of birth4Mattias GoranssonF1.9625.05.1983Södertälje\n5Serdar AkyuzG1.8518.04.1983Skärholmen, Stockholm\n10Lesli MyrthilF2.0023.04.1977Spanga, Stockholm\n22.08.2005 - By Sam Peters, PA SportSweden: Fleverakis Looks Ahead To Difficult Task04.05.2005 - By Jeff Taylor, PA InternationalFlevarakis Ready For Sweden Challenge03.05.2005Sweden Appoint New National Team Coach19.04.2005 - By Steve Douglas, PA InternationalTriumphant Gehrke Has One Eye On Sweden19.08.2004Enjebo Phlegmatic about Sweden Chances22.09.2003European Championship for Men 2005 Qualification\nTeamSwedenTeam homeRosterAccumulated StatsSchedule & ResultsTeam HistoryTEAM LEADERSPoints Per GameMats Levin10.2Total ReboundsFredrik Jonzen6.0AssistsMats Levin3.5StealsJoakim Kjellbom1.5Blocked ShotsJoakim Kjellbom1.3\nTEAM COMPARISONSweden vs Select a teamBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaCroatiaCzech RepublicEstoniaFranceGermanyHungaryIsraelLatviaNetherlandsPolandPortugalRussiaSloveniaTurkeyUkraineSCHEDULE11.09.2004vs RUS[L] 64-97 (A)15.09.2004vs CRO[L] 69-86 (H)22.09.2004vs RUS[L] 81-92 (H)25.09.2004vs CRO[L] 61-75 (A)23.08.2005vs HUN[L] 68-75 (A)26.08.2005vs POR[L] 71-77 (H)01.09.2005vs HUN[W] 73-67 (H)04.09.2005vs POR[L] 67-74 (A)11.09.2005vs POL[W] 67-5512.09.2005vs NED[W] 78-65UniformsContact Us | Legal NoticeCopyright 2016 FIBA EUROPE. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.FIBA EUROPE, Ismaninger Str. 21, 81675 Munich, Germany. Phone: +49 89 78 06 08-0, Fax+49 89 78 06 08-59Design by www.zeughaus.comBelgiumBELBosnia and HerzegovinaBIHBulgariaBULCroatiaCROCzech RepublicCZEEstoniaESTFranceFRAGermanyGERHungaryHUNIsraelISRLatviaLATNetherlandsNEDPolandPOLPortugalPORRussiaRUSSloveniaSLOSwedenSWETurkeyTURUkraineUKR


Foam Dining Room Chairs - 85 For Sale at 1stDibs\nLate 20th Century American Mid-Century Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n21st Century and Contemporary Italian Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1970s American Chinese Chippendale Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1960s American Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nAmura Monnalisa Dining Chair in Leather and Dark Oak Base by Amuralab\nS Chair Tonica 2 0411\n21st Century and Contemporary Polish Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1940s Italian Neoclassical Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1960s American Empire Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1980s American Post-Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nMid-20th Century Italian Mid-Century Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nRiccardo Blumer & Matteo Borghi BB Dining Chair in Matte White Leather Poliform\nBy Poliform, Riccardo Blumer\nSingle matte white BB dining or side chair made with a light expended polyurethane frame and leather exoskeleton. Designed by Riccardo Blumer & Matteo Borghi and manufactured by Poli...\nEarly 2000s Italian Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n21st Century and Contemporary Spanish Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1950s American Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nAdrian Pearsall Set of Chairs\nAn extraordinary set of four mid-century dining chairs in the manner of Adrian Pearsall has been newly reupholstered in a light green fabric and professionally restored by our team o...\n1990s Italian Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1970s American Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n4 Cees Braakman SA07 Teak Wood Dining Chairs UMS Pastoe New Upholstery De Ploeg\nSet of 4 solid Teak wood SA07 chairs by Dutch designer Cees Braakman for UMS Pastoe from around 1960 Minimal design but yet very functional and comfortable chairs to use The ch...\n1960s Dutch Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nFabric, Wool, Foam, Teak\n1970s Italian Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1970s French Space Age Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nS Chair Tonus 4 0631\n2010s North American Foam Dining Room Chairs\n2010s Lebanese Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nSet of Twelve Chippendale Mahogany Dining Chairs\nAn extraordinary vintage set of twelve dining chairs handcrafted out of solid mahogany wood and are stained a rich dark mahogany color with a satin lacquered finish. This fabulous se...\n1940s English Queen Anne Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nBy Cassina, Erik Gunnar Asplund\n20th Century Swedish Bauhaus Foam Dining Room Chairs\n21st Century and Contemporary Danish Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nPaul McCobb "Irwin Collection" Dining Chairs with Brass Accents\nPaul McCobb "Irwin Collection" dining chairs with brass accents for Calvin Furniture.\nSet of 2 Velvet Gropius Chair by NOOM\nSet of 2 Velvet Gropius chair by NOOM Dimensions: H 74 x W 57 x D 57 cm Materials: Wood, Foam rubber, injection-molded soft foam, velvet Fabrics Available: Velvet, Wool, Savoy ...\n2010s Ukrainian Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1950s Czech Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1980s American Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nSet of T.H. Robsjohn Gibbings Style Dining Chairs\nA set of eight Mid-Century Modern dining chairs in a manner of T.H. Robsjohn Gibbings in excellent condition that has been hand-crafted out of walnut and restored by our team of craf...\n20th Century North American Spanish Colonial Foam Dining Room Chairs\nNoble Chair in Pure Wood, by Arne Hovmand-Olsen from Warm Nordic\n1950s Danish Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1960s Danish Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1970s American Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n2010s American Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nEarly 2000s Italian Mid-Century Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nArne Hovmand-Olsen Model-71 Teak & Leather Dining Chairs for J.L. Møllers\nArne Hovmand-Olsen Model-71 teak & leather dining chairs for J.L. Møllers.\n1950s French Art Deco Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\n20th Century American Post-Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nCarlo chair by Studioestudio Dimensions: W 55 x D 51 x H 73 cm Seat 46 cm Materials: Beech wood structure. Foam CMHR(high resilience and flame retardant) Carlo is a chai...\n2010s Spanish Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\n1990s American Modern Foam Dining Room Chairs\nHenning Kjærnulf Teak & Leather Dining Chairs for Vejle Møbler\nHenning Kjærnulf teak & leather dining chairs for Vejle Møbler.\nNiels Koefoed "Ingrid" Teak Dining Chairs for Koefoeds Hornslet\nNiels Koefoed "Ingrid" teak dining chairs for Koefoeds Hornslet.\nArne Hovmand-Olsen Teak & Leather Dining Chairs for Mogens Kold\nArne Hovmand-Olsen teak & leather dining chairs for Mogens Kold.\n1950s Mid-Century Modern Vintage Foam Dining Room Chairs\nAn extraordinary set of six mid-century modern dining room chairs are hand-crafted out of wood and features a unique sleek frame design newly stained in an ebonized color with a sati...


Dan Tyminski – Fervor Coulee- roots music opinion\n2019 December 29 Leave a comment\nDan Tyminski- Wheels\n2008 October 24 2010 March 9 Leave a comment\nDan Tyminski Wheels Rounder The majority of acoustic music fans may be entirely unaware of Dan Tyminski. Tyminski not only gave voice to George Cloony in O Brother, Where Art Thou?, he has been the guitarist and vocalist for Alison Krauss & Union Station for more than a decade. His second solo album, one… Continue reading Dan Tyminski- Wheels\n2008 ReleasesBluegrassBluegrass CD reviewsDan TyminskiRounder Records


MWSoft | Discord Me: Discord Server Discovery\nRelated Categories: Business 883 Programming 1,024\n- GTA / FiveM Leaks - Coding Leaks (MC, GMOD, RUST, R6) - Development Section - Few rules // No rules - Need Staff - Community Ran\ntäältä voit ostaa juttuja\n5Station للخوادم وخدمات البرمجة\n5Station فايف ستيشن للخوادم وخدمات الويب والبرمجة https://5Station.net\nVerus is a popular packet based anticheat based on the minecraft protocol. Verus is designed to operate primarily on netty threads with no noticeable performance overhead yet still with the powerful ability to detect and eliminate cheaters from your server quickly.\nServidor oficial da minha comunidade


Kyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers skiednis (2022)\nKyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers skiednis skiednis sûnt 1993 oant 2022. Currency conversion chart Kyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar (2022).\nWy hâlde in skiednis fan 'e wikselkoersen fan alle faluta's foar elk jier. De skiednis fan wikselkoersen foar elke datum en foar elk jier dat jo by ús kinne fine. De heule skiednis fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers foar elk jier. De skiednis fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers fan 1992 oant 2022 is te krijen op dizze pagina. Wikselkoersen yn it ferline, foar elk jier.\nIn grafyk fan 'e skiednis fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar sûnt 1992 mei in offerte foar elk jier. Jo kinne de skiednis fan feroarings yn Kyrgyzstani som / Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers oer ferskate jierren besjen op 'e kaart op dizze pagina. Grafyk fan 'e skiednis fan offertes fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar sûnt 1992 online en fergees. Hold de hover oer de kaart en sjoch de krekte Kyrgyzstani som nei Amerikaanske dollar offerte foar it selekteare jier. De grafyk foar wikselkoersen hat ynteraktive prompts. Beweech oer de grafyk.\nConvert Kyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar Kyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar Wikselkoers Kyrgyzstani som Nei Amerikaanske dollar live op Forex exchange market\nMay 2022 0.012180\nApril 2022 0.010474\nMaart 2022 0.011765\nFebrewaris 2022 0.011789\nJannewaris 2022 0.011790\nDe skiednis fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoersen is sûnt 1992 yn 'e tabel beskikber. Dizze Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoersen yn 'e tabel foar elk jier binne hjir fergees. In online tabel oer de skiednis fan offertes fan Kyrgyzstani som / Amerikaanske dollar faluta foar elk jier sûnt 1992 is makke op dizze pagina. De skiednis fan 'e wikselkoersen fan elk jier foar moannen is beskikber troch te klikken op de link fan it jier yn' e tabel fan 'e faluta histoarje. Moanlikse offertes fan Kyrgyzstani som nei Amerikaanske dollar, jo kinne sjen as jo klikke op de keppeling fan it jier yn 'e histoarje tabel foar it jier.\nYnskatte hoefolle de munt is feroare oer 10, 20 of 30 jier. Sjoch in diagram mei offertes oer in lange tiid. De opkomst en fal fan Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar sûnt 1992. Ferheegje en ferminderje yn Kyrgyzstani som / Amerikaanske dollar wikselkoers elk jier foar: 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999 , 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 jier. Op ús side is der in skiednis fan 'e tariven fan alle faluta relatyf oan allegear.\nKies in faluta yn plak fan in Kyrgyzstani som om de histoarje fan syn wikselkoers út te finen nei Amerikaanske dollar. Online skiednis fan offertes fan ien munt nei de oare foar alle jierren is hjir. Kyrgyzstani som oant Amerikaanske dollar foar 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020. De skiednis fan Kyrgyzstani som wikselkoers foar elk selektearre jier is fergees te krijen as jo op de kepling fan it jier klikke yn 'e tabel foar skiednis fan sitaten.


"Novaja russkaja vežlivostʹ" - moda delovogo ėtiketa ili korennoe pragmatičeskoe izmenenie?\nAuthors: [Rathmayr, Renate] Ratmajr, Renate\nTranslated Title: "The new Russian politeness" : transient vogue of the business etiquette or basic pragmatic change?\nProvider: Brill Database: Brill Online Bibliographies Content: text/plain; charset="utf-8" TY - JOUR KW - Grammatical semantics KW - Pragmatics, discourse analysis and text grammar KW - Russian KW - Aspect KW - Context AU - Padučeva Падучева, Elena V.Елена Викторовна TI - O semantike russkogo vida v diskursivnom konteksteО семантике русского вида в дискурсивном контексте LA - Russian TT - On the semantics of Russian aspect in the context of discourse JO - Voprosy jazykoznanija : teoretičeskij žurnal po obščemu i sravnitelʹnomu jazykoznanijuВопросы языкознания : теоретический журнал по общему и сравнительному языкознанию 0373-658XPY - 2017 IS - 1 SP - 7-23 N1 - Ru. & E. ab. UR - http://bibliographies.brillonline.com/entries/linguistic-bibliography/o-semantike-russkogo-vida-v-diskursivnom-kontekste-lb900000430712 ER - TY - JOUR KW - Pragmatics, discourse analysis and text grammar KW - Semantics KW - Semantics and pragmatics KW - French KW - Italian KW - Russian KW - Proposition KW - Simplification AU - InʹkovaИнькова, Olʹga Ju.Ольга Юрьевна TI - Generalizacija : opredelenie, tekstovye funkcii, pokazateli (na materiale russkogo, francuzskogo i italʹjanskogo jazykov)Генерализация : определение, текстовые функции, показатели (на материале русского, французского и итальянского языков) LA - Russian TT - Generalization : definition, discourse functions, markers (in Russian, French, and Italian) JO - Voprosy jazykoznanija : teoretičeskij žurnal po obščemu i sravnitelʹnomu jazykoznanijuВопросы языкознания : теоретический журнал по общему и сравнительному языкознанию 0373-658XPY - 2017 IS - 3 SP - 53-82 N1 - Ru. & E. ab. UR - http://bibliographies.brillonline.com/entries/linguistic-bibliography/generalizacija-opredelenie-tekstovye-funkcii-pokazateli-na-materiale-russkogo-francuzskogo-i-italjanskogo-jazykov-lb900000430836 ER - TY - JOUR KW - Pragmatics, discourse analysis and text grammar KW - Sociolinguistics, language variation KW - Russian KW - Politeness AU - Ratmajr, Renate TI - "Novaja russkaja vežlivostʹ" - moda delovogo ėtiketa ili korennoe pragmatičeskoe izmenenie? LA - Russian TT - "The new Russian politeness" : transient vogue of the business etiquette or basic pragmatic change? JO - Voprosy jazykoznanija : teoretičeskij žurnal po obščemu i sravnitelʹnomu jazykoznanijuВопросы языкознания : теоретический журнал по общему и сравнительному языкознанию 0373-658XVL - 57 IS - 1 PY - 2009 SP - 63-81 UR - http://bibliographies.brillonline.com/entries/linguistic-bibliography/novaja-russkaja-vezlivost-moda-delovogo-etiketa-ili-korennoe-pragmaticeskoe-izmenenie-lb200000252621 ER -


Formula 1 pictures of 1999 - Page 4\nby toleman19 on Tue 16 Dec - 18:14\n[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] #9 Giancarlo Fisichella\nby Goodwood95 on Fri 30 Jan - 19:34\nby vasko13598 on Fri 30 Jan - 21:59\nby fjgines on Tue 24 Mar - 23:02\nby Winners311 on Wed 25 Mar - 20:12\nAustralian Gp ( This is a resume post of all photos added in Race by Race)\nby Winners311 on Wed 25 Mar - 22:01\nby Winners311 on Wed 25 Mar - 22:38\nby Winners311 on Thu 26 Mar - 0:28\nby vasko13598 on Sat 28 Mar - 11:47\nby fjgines on Sun 29 Mar - 20:06\n[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.] España #06 Schumacher


Hunter Indoor Outdoor Ceiling Fan Cool Outdoor Ceiling Fans Outdoor Ceiling Fans Like The Hunter Outdoor Walmart Indoor Outdoor Ceiling Fans Hunter Light Kit Ceiling Fan Light Cover Plate Hunter Ceiling Fan Hunter – renaldiet.info\nHunter Indoor Outdoor Ceiling Fan Cool Outdoor Ceiling Fans Outdoor Ceiling Fans Like The Hunter Outdoor Walmart Indoor Outdoor Ceiling Fans Hunter Light Kit Ceiling Fan Light Cover Plate Hunter Ceiling Fan Hunter\nhunter indoor outdoor ceiling fan cool outdoor ceiling fans outdoor ceiling fans like the hunter outdoor walmart indoor outdoor ceiling fans hunter light kit ceiling fan light cover plate hunter ceiling fan hunter.\nbest hugger ceiling fans hunter ceiling fans with lights best of best hugger ceiling fans hunter ceiling fans with lights best of white indoor outdoor ceiling fans lighting the home hugger ceiling fans without light kit, white revolution indooroutdoor ceiling fan with w led light white revolution indooroutdoor ceiling fan with w led light lighting illusions online, hunter indooroutdoor ceiling fan the original black hunter fan indoor outdoor ceiling fan in black with teak wood blades, hunter cast iron ceiling fans reviews ctt dva hunter indoor outdoor ceiling fans, home depot hunter ceiling fans indoor outdoor matte silver ceiling home depot hunter ceiling fans home depot bathroom ceiling fan with light outdoor ceiling fans indoor , hunter bridgeport in indooroutdoor ceiling fan walmartcom hunter bridgeport in indooroutdoor ceiling fan, amazing deal hunter cassius in indooroutdoor ceiling fan hunter cassius in indooroutdoor ceiling fan , hunter ceiling fans with remote control included led indoor outdoor hunter ceiling fans with remote control included remote control included march hunter outdoor ceiling fans , hunter white indoor outdoor ceiling fan reversible a large image of the hunter beachcomber white, deal alert off hunter newsome in indooroutdoor ceiling fan hunter newsome in indooroutdoor ceiling fan , lowes ceiling fan hunter timothygrossmaninfo lowes ceiling fan hunter indoor outdoor ceiling fans furniture small ceiling fan clearance hunter ceiling fans.\nPosted on 04/20/2019 04:26:11 pm Full size hunter-indoor-outdoor-ceiling-fan-cool-outdoor-ceiling-fans-outdoor-ceiling-fans-like-the-hunter-outdoor-walmart-indoor-outdoor-ceiling-fans-hunter-light-kit-ceiling-fan-light-cover.jpg


How do I delete my Instagram fan page? - Contemporary Communication\nHow do I delete my Instagram fan page?\nHow do you delete a fan page on Instagram?\nIs Instagram gonna delete fan pages?\nHow do I protect my fan account on Instagram?\nIT\_'S AMAZING: Is there twitter app for Windows 10?


Once Again :: FicWad: fresh-picked original and fan fiction\nCategory: Lord of the Rings - Rating: PG-13 - Genres: Drama,Sci-fi - Characters: Aragorn,Bilbo,Boromir,Eomer,Gimli,Legolas - Warnings: [!!!] - Chapters: 10 - Published: 2015-02-07 - Updated: 2015-07-15 - 13906 words\nCategory: Lord of the Rings - Rating: PG-13 - Genres: Drama,Fantasy,Romance - Characters: Aragorn,Bilbo,Boromir,Eomer,Gimli,Legolas - Warnings: [!!!] - Published: 2015-02-10 - 1212 words\nUp Upon The Moutain\nCategory: Lord of the Rings - Rating: PG-13 - Genres: Drama,Fantasy,Romance - Characters: Aragorn,Bilbo,Boromir,Eomer,Gimli,Legolas - Warnings: [!!!] - Published: 2015-02-10 - 1333 words\nDay One Of Darkness\nCategory: Lord of the Rings - Rating: G - Genres: Romance - Characters: Aragorn,Boromir,Frodo,Legolas,Merry,Pippin - Warnings: [!] - Published: 2015-07-15 - 1147 words


Gay men bikini thong pic - Porn Pictures Archive\nPorn Pictures > Page 3741 Bikini\nGay Men Bikini Thong Pic\nBikini thongs babes girls pic, thong tiny micro pree teen pics gay penis, hispanic men bubble butt, catherine bell boys video jennifer aniston, young pictures nudist army tied up, in pantyhose hot having sex free naked, the twins brown yellow panty, hottest porn jb xxx sexy andrea maternity, girl arab stars bikinis gold nude ass, lost snow sling blondes blog forums.\nPrevious Classic Hentai Fucking\nNext Classic Group Sex Orgy\nTan thong bikini related porn pics\nBikini Blog Forums Resolution: 420x631 Size: 42kb Views: 1093 Category: Bikini Ass\nUltra Micro Bikini Resolution: 420x631 Size: 77kb Views: 1128 Category: Sex Bikini\nYoung Micro Bikini Resolution: 420x631 Size: 51kb Views: 1102 Category: Young Bikini Girls\nSling Bikini Girls Resolution: 420x631 Size: 41kb Views: 1092 Category: Girls In Bikinis\nXxx Micro Bikinis Resolution: 420x631 Size: 35kb Views: 1086 Category: Teen Bikinis\nBikini Girls Snow Resolution: 420x631 Size: 53kb Views: 1104 Category: Girls In Bikinis\nSexy Anime Bikini Resolution: 595x446 Size: 53kb Views: 1094 Category: Sexy Anime\nTeen Arab Bikini Resolution: 745x419 Size: 52kb Views: 1216 Category: Teeny Bikini\nAndrea In Bikini Resolution: 446x595 Size: 61kb Views: 1102 Category: Wet Bikini\nHot Bikini Porn Resolution: 631x420 Size: 81kb Views: 1132 Category: Porn Hot\nHottest Bikini Resolution: 420x631 Size: 40kb Views: 1091 Category: Bikinis\nBikini Tit Sex Resolution: 419x601 Size: 46kb Views: 1066 Category: Bikini Tits\nYellow Bikini Resolution: 441x595 Size: 39kb Views: 1075 Category: Hot Bikini\nSexy Gay Mature Men Resolution: 446x595 Size: 49kb Views: 1090 Category: Mature Sexy Women\nJennifer Aniston Bikini Pics Resolution: 631x420 Size: 54kb Views: 1105 Category: Hot Bikini\nBikini Pics Catherine Bell Resolution: 420x596 Size: 48kb Views: 1064 Category: Bikini Sex\nBubble Butt Thong Pics Resolution: 420x631 Size: 24kb Views: 1075 Category: Bubble Butt Porn\nBillie Piper Bikini Pics Resolution: 640x419 Size: 36kb Views: 1095 Category: Als Bikini\nJunior Boy Bikini Pics Resolution: 420x700 Size: 39kb Views: 1159 Category: Mom Bikini\nThong Tiny Micro Bikini Resolution: 595x556 Size: 71kb Views: 1222 Category: Thong Bikinis\nMicro Bikinis Beach Pictures Resolution: 508x595 Size: 46kb Views: 1149 Category: Teen Bikinis\nShear Bikini Resolution: 420x631 Size: 51kb Views: 1102 Category: Hot Bikini\nWearing Bikini Resolution: 476x595 Size: 54kb Views: 1125 Category: Bikini Ass\nMaternity Bikini Resolution: 464x595 Size: 43kb Views: 1102 Category: Hot Bikini\nBikini Girls Lost Resolution: 420x631 Size: 60kb Views: 1111 Category: Girls In Bikinis\nBest Bikini Girls Resolution: 420x609 Size: 52kb Views: 1081 Category: Girls In Bikinis\nBlonde Milf Bikini Resolution: 450x595 Size: 74kb Views: 1119 Category: Milf Bikini\nHot Bikini Blondes Resolution: 420x631 Size: 59kb Views: 1110 Category: Bikini Hottie\nHot Swimmer Bikinis Resolution: 446x595 Size: 50kb Views: 1091 Category: Hot\nBig Tit Teen Bikini Resolution: 518x595 Size: 43kb Views: 1156 Category: Big Tits Bikini\nBikini Teen Handjob Resolution: 595x446 Size: 55kb Views: 1096 Category: Teen Handjobs\nGay men bikini thong pic, Gay males bikinis, Gay men swimsuit pics, Men bikini pic\nBlonde milf bikini best girls japanese thong, solo gay babe in wearing shear, men nude michelle mccool massage porn, micro bikinis beach pictures big hairy, pics babes blog tits, male junior boy billie piper older anal, eating cum sexy mature hot comments, of latin zac efron fuck, bitch chicks tit sex ass, tube talk huge secretary dawn wells anime, joss stone ultra teens thongs.\nClassic Das Sexabitur\nClassic Caroline Topdog\nClassic Busty Pool Lesbians\nClassic British Anal Scene Laura Jones\nClassic Blowjob Instruction Roleplay\nClassic Sweet Lesbian Threesome Trinity\nClass Filipina Whore Sucks Fucks Pov\nClashing Titans Maxi Kayla\nClarice Adora Trepar De Formas Diferente\nClara Sweet First\nClara Morgane Lusty Couple Fucking\nClara Morgane Casting Sex Scene\nClara Morgan Making\nClara Amuse Devant Son Mari\nClam Pumper Cockstick Pamper Fuckalicious Slut\nClaire Takes Double Penetration\nClaire Robbins Loves Interracial Fucking\nClaire Robbinf Fucked Two Black Dick\nClaire Ripped Pantyhose\nClaire Pussy Print Gfrevenge\nClaire La Femme Anal\nClaire Green Meets Rocco\nClaire Gets Big Black Cock\nClaire French Blonde\nClaire Dames Sexy Blowjobs\nClaire Dames Cute Brunette Pair\nClaire Dames Good Hardcore Fuck Video\nClaire Dames Anal Guys\nPornPicturesArchive.com > Page 3741 > Bikini free pictures and videos


Wings' Marchenko a fan of Datsyuk | Video Library | Detroit Free Press\nA more detailed report on a May audit of Veterans Affairs facilities showed personnel in Ann Arbor...- 4:25 pm\nLions call off contract talks with Suh for now (video)\nThe Detroit Lions have decided not to negotiate with defensive tackle Ndamukong Suh until after the...- 4:15 pm\nWings' Marchenko a fan of Datsyuk\nDetroit Red Wings prospect Alexei Marchenko talks about being teammates with Pavel Datsyuk in the KHL. Video by George Sipple / DFP\nWings' Marchenko a fan of Datsyuk Detroit Red Wings prospect Alexei Marchenko talks about being teammates with Pavel Datsyuk in the KHL. Video by George Sipple / DFP\n2813 Red WingshockeynhlsportsDetroit Red Wingsiphonedetroitapp_mainDFP 01:33


jowolstencroft, | Trulia\nHi jowolstencroft. I saw your profile on Trulia and wanted to see if you could help me.\nConnect with Facebook to discover if any of your friends have reviewed jowolstencroft.\njowolstencroft has not written a bio yet.\nDo you know jowolstencroft?\njowolstencroft's Properties (0)\njowolstencroft has not posted any listings yet.\njowolstencroft's Sale Prices\njowolstencroft has not added any past sales\njowolstencroft's Experience & Skills\njowolstencroft has not added experience and skills yet.\njowolstencroft's Work Experience\njowolstencroft has not added any work experience yet.\nCheck out all of jowolstencroft's activity on the Trulia community, Trulia Voices. If you have a real estate question, get answers from professionals by posting there.\njowolstencroft does not have any activity on the Trulia community, Trulia Voices, yet.\nShare jowolstencroft's Profile\nYou have declined to verify your review of jowolstencroft.


Sarah Durocher (durocher1337) on Pinterest\nSmores BrowniesBrownie DessertsCookie Brownie BarsBrownie RecipesBrownie ToppingsParfait DessertsChocolate BrowniesSmores DessertDessert BarsRecipesPostresSandwichesTreatsDrinkBiscuitAngelsFoodiesChocolatesSnacksPiesCakesRezepteCake ToppingsChocolate Chip BrowniesChoclate BrowniesForward\nS& Brownie Batter Bars. Gooey bars with brownie batter sandwiched between marshmallow covered golden grahams and toasted marshmallows on top!\nVitamix Tomato SoupVegan Tomato SoupRoasted Tomato Basil SoupCream Tomato SoupTomato Carrot SoupDairy Free Tomato SoupHomemade Tomato Basil SoupEasy Tomato Basil SoupWhole 30 Tomato SoupDinner PartiesSaucesRecipesYummy RecipesSoupsSnacksChristeningHealthy MealsKitchensPeek A BoosFall SeasonHandsCooking FoodFood DrinkTomatoesForward\nAsian Food RecipesShrimp RecipesEasy RecipesBang Bang ShrimpSeafood DishesSeafood SoupKey IngredientHoliday RecipesDinner RecipesBoardPrawn RecipesEasy Shot RecipesAsian RecipesRecipes For ShrimpEasy Food RecipesSimple RecipesEasy CookingFish SoupCooking RecipesForward\nBang Bang Shrimp Recipe Appetizers, Main Dishes with medium shrimp, mayonnaise…\nThai Curry RecipesThai Food RecipesRecipes With VegetablesVeggiesThai Red CurryCurry RiceVegetarian DinnersFood DinnersVegetable CurryEggCooking FoodVegan DinnersVegetablesVegetarian Dinner PartiesSuppersThai RecipesDinersFast DinnersDinnersForward\nGround Beef Recipes AsianGround Beef And Rice Recipes For DinnerQuick Ground Turkey RecipesKorean Ground BeefQuick Beef RecipesKorean Beef BowlDinner RecipesGround Beef RiceDinner IdeasChineseSweet TreatsCooking RecipesKitchensCooking FoodCowlsRiceRezepteForward\nCrock Pot RecipesKeto RecipesRecipes Slow CookerChicken RecipesHealthy RecipesJerk ChickenGarlic CloveLime WedgeWeight LossCasserole RecipesGround Chicken RecipesLosing WeightHealthy Eating RecipesClean Eating RecipesLoosing WeightEat Clean RecipesHealthy Slow CookerHealthy Diet RecipesForward\nCrockpot Jerk Chicken - The Keto Diet Recipe Cafe


Windows Server 2016 AMD Ryzen 7 Benchmarks - OpenBenchmarking.org\nAMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core testing with a MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34) and AMD Radeon RX 480 4095MB on Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299 via the Phoronix Test Suite.\nCompare your own system(s) to this result file with the Phoronix Test Suite by running the command: phoronix-test-suite benchmark 1804033-AR-1804026AR95\nProcessor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34), Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 1467MHz Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15, Disk: 112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB, Graphics: Microsoft Basic Display, Network: Realtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAP\nProcessor: AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads), Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34), Memory: 2 x 8192 MB 1467MHz Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15, Disk: 112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GB, Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 480 4095MB, Network: Realtek PCIe GBE Family\nOS: Microsoft Windows 10 Pro Build 16299, Kernel: 10.0 (x86_64), Display Driver: 23.20.15033.5003, OpenCL: OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2527.10), Compiler: GCC 7.1.0, File-System: NTFS, Screen Resolution: 3840x2160\nWindows Server 2016 AMD Ryzen 7ProcessorMotherboardMemoryDiskGraphicsNetworkOSKernelDisplay DriverCompilerFile-SystemScreen ResolutionOpenCLWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core @ 3.00GHz (8 Cores / 16 Threads)MSI B350 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A34)2 x 8192 MB 1467MHz Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15112GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO 120GBMicrosoft Basic DisplayRealtek PCIe GBE Family + Microsoft ISATAPMicrosoft Windows Server 2016 Essentials Build 1439310.0 (x86_64)10.0.14393.0GCC 7.1.0NTFS1024x768AMD Radeon RX 480 4095MBRealtek PCIe GBE FamilyMicrosoft Windows 10 Pro Build 1629923.20.15033.5003OpenCL 2.1 AMD-APP (2527.10)3840x2160OpenBenchmarking.orgPython Details- Python 2.7.14\nWindows Server 2016 vs. Windows 10 Pro Build 16299 ComparisonPhoronix Test Suite 10.6.1Baseline+9094.8%+9094.8%+18189.6%+18189.6%+27284.4%+27284.4%131.5%111.9%108.5%106%96.6%93.7%91.9%90.1%70.5%66.7%64.3%63.7%63%61.8%47.3%44.3%36.6%35.4%34.7%30.7%20.6%20.2%19.5%17.2%12.6%9.5%9.1%4.3%3.8%3.7%3.7%3.2%2.1%Launch Programs36379.2%Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read OnlyLPUSHSETSADDGETH.2.H.T.N.DLPOPBuffer Test - Single Thread - Read WriteInterpreter74.6%Create Files73.6%H.2.V.ET.S.I69.3%F.F.T67%SharpenhttpResizingC.S.TBlurbuild49.2%Memory AllocationsCreate ThreadsSeq Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KBT.T.C.C.G.C36.2%Rand Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KBHWB Color Space192.168.1.55 - U.R.R - 60 Seconds4Kb - 8GB - Read Performance23.5%Seq Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB192.168.1.55 - T.R.R - 60 Seconds1 - 50 - 1M - 4KB1MB - 8GB - Read Performance18.3%MemoryComposite10.9%Solitaire9.7%DiskTotal TimePod2html8.4%D.L.M.F8.3%S.M.M8.2%T.F.A.T.T8%S.M.M7.5%J.S.O.R7.1%P.B.S6.2%S.W.P.S6%Read5.7%F.F.T5.7%D.T5.4%J.S.O.R5.4%Graceful5.4%Monte Carlo5.3%Write5.2%Quasigroup5%R.M.W5%2048 x 2048 - Total Time5%Monte Carlo4.8%Composite4.5%R.4.b.P4.4%1MB - 8GB - Write Performance4.3%L.A.TElapsed Time4.2%jsonC.5.P.DgarbageC.C.4.S3.4%Rand Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB1.P.N.GD.L.M.F2%OSBenchPostgreSQL pgbenchRedisRedisRedisRedisFFmpegRedisPostgreSQL pgbenchPerl BenchmarksOSBenchx264SQLiteSciMarkGraphicsMagickGo BenchmarksGraphicsMagick7-Zip CompressionGraphicsMagickGo BenchmarksOSBenchOSBenchFlexible IO TesterGitFlexible IO TesterGraphicsMagickNetperfIOzoneFlexible IO TesterNetperfDiskspdIOzoneWinSATebizzySciMarkMinionWinSATC-RayPerl BenchmarksSciMarkJava SciMarkPyBenchSciMarkSciMarkPHPBenchNGINX BenchmarkCacheBenchJava SciMarklibjpeg-turbo tjbenchJava SciMarkMinionSciMarkCacheBenchMinionCacheBenchAOBenchJava SciMarkJava SciMarkOpenSSLIOzoneGraphicsMagickCraftyGo BenchmarksY-CruncherGo BenchmarksFhourstonesFlexible IO TesterPrimesieveJava SciMarkWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299\nWindows Server 2016 AMD Ryzen 7sqlite: Timed SQLite Insertionsfio: Rand Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Rand Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Read - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directoryfio: Seq Write - Windows AIO - No - Yes - 4KB - Default Test Directorydiskspd: 1 - 50 - 1M - 4KBiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Read Performanceiozone: 1MB - 8GB - Write Performanceiozone: 4Kb - 8GB - Write Performancenetperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - 10 Secondsffte: N=256, 1D Complex FFT Routineblake2: go-benchmark: httpgo-benchmark: jsongo-benchmark: buildgo-benchmark: garbagejava-scimark2: Compositejava-scimark2: Monte Carlojava-scimark2: Fast Fourier Transformjava-scimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyjava-scimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationjava-scimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationfhourstones: Complex Connect-4 Solvingcachebench: Readcachebench: Writecachebench: Read / Modify / Writescimark2: Compositescimark2: Monte Carloscimark2: Fast Fourier Transformscimark2: Sparse Matrix Multiplyscimark2: Dense LU Matrix Factorizationscimark2: Jacobi Successive Over-Relaxationcrafty: Elapsed Timejohn-the-ripper: Blowfishjohn-the-ripper: Traditional DESjohn-the-ripper: MD5x264: H.264 Video Encodinggraphics-magick: Blurgraphics-magick: Sharpengraphics-magick: Resizinggraphics-magick: HWB Color Spacegraphics-magick: Local Adaptive Thresholdingcompress-7zip: Compress Speed Testebizzy: c-ray: Total Timeprimesieve: 1e12 Prime Number Generationy-cruncher: Calculating 500M Pi Digitsaobench: 2048 x 2048 - Total Timeffmpeg: H.264 HD To NTSC DVminion: Gracefulminion: Solitaireminion: Quasigroupperl-benchmark: Pod2htmlperl-benchmark: Interpreteropenssl: RSA 4096-bit Performanceeuler3d: CFD Cycle Freqtjbench: Decompression Throughputpgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Onlypgbench: Buffer Test - Single Thread - Read Writeredis: LPOPredis: SADDredis: LPUSHredis: GETredis: SETwinsat: Diskwinsat: Memoryblender: BMW27 - CPU-Onlyblender: Barbershop - CPU-Onlypybench: Total For Average Test Timesnginx: Static Web Page Servingphpbench: PHP Benchmark Suitegit: Time To Complete Common Git Commandsosbench: Create Filesosbench: Create Threadsosbench: Launch Programsosbench: Memory Allocationsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Request Response - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Request Response - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Client To Server - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - TCP Stream - Server To Client - 60 Secondsnetperf: 192.168.1.55 - UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - 60 Secondsopenarena: 2560 x 1440unigine-heaven: 1920 x 1080 - Fullscreenxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Lowxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Highxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultraxonotic: 3840 x 2160 - Ultimateparaview: Many Spheres - 1920 x 1080paraview: Many Spheres - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Volume - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Volume - 3840 x 2160paraview: Wavelet Contour - 1920 x 1080paraview: Wavelet Contour - 3840 x 2160Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629995.20206189194194120.385008.251501.09125.35121.90713.997748.608.061981187519282611338990017746682394.631431.361704.842362.515061.181413.2510766.509527.0225588.7149349.16487.32123.59218.47615.55426.001052.96640729797942561633314314736.756869911247020952271310.0441.5045.4963.9916.2358.2061.29140.540.267663440.02079791134.037.76161.824171.22684.68502869.63375714.25304451.78514809.44358685.00134.1827583.59332.031701.291679648.5924412012.74650.2752.381345.10205.25165.42207.45784.89702.04714.74161.18279195265234143.864234.031215.36120.17121.87722.938.051206184295023896261490017112682292.131365.601612.482182.744959.531340.2810408.979009.0224325.9747015.64439.51117.41130.80572.44393.41983.49614703497912571900014206862.67110115149167733416230559.2040.6343.8567.168.3861.3567.23147.610.290234360.03630660128.437.67153.469657.121301.33964855.08773906.83645219.691012261.88747868.58146.9932336.64330.101680.471814612.0422995617.351129.1636.29490681.07139.33198.91271.24785.56707.78723.65173.7370.30241.73192.70167.68128.8930.2630.53154.81145.06154.81142.86OpenBenchmarking.org\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 0.18, N = 3SE +/- 1.09, N = 395.20161.18\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterSQLite 3.22Timed SQLite InsertionsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 94.85 / Avg: 95.2 / Max: 95.47Min: 160.01 / Avg: 161.18 / Max: 163.35\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629960120180240300SE +/- 5.91, N = 6206279\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250Min: 255 / Avg: 279.33 / Max: 298\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629915K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 233.33, N = 3SE +/- 1518.20, N = 65246771517\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629912K24K36K48K60KMin: 52000 / Avg: 52466.67 / Max: 52700Min: 65300 / Avg: 71516.67 / Max: 76300\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 3.57, N = 6189195\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200Min: 188 / Avg: 189.33 / Max: 190Min: 182 / Avg: 195.33 / Max: 208\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629911K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 176.38, N = 3SE +/- 913.39, N = 64853349983\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Random Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162999K18K27K36K45KMin: 48200 / Avg: 48533.33 / Max: 48800Min: 46600 / Avg: 49983.33 / Max: 53200\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629960120180240300SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 4.99, N = 6194265\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250Min: 193 / Avg: 194.33 / Max: 195Min: 246 / Avg: 265 / Max: 276\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629915K30K45K60K75KSE +/- 145.30, N = 3SE +/- 1288.67, N = 64976767800\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Read - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629912K24K36K48K60KMin: 49500 / Avg: 49766.67 / Max: 50000Min: 62900 / Avg: 67800 / Max: 70600\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250SE +/- 0.67, N = 3SE +/- 1.86, N = 3194234\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200Min: 193 / Avg: 194.33 / Max: 195Min: 230 / Avg: 233.67 / Max: 236\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629913K26K39K52K65KSE +/- 100.00, N = 3SE +/- 470.22, N = 34970059733\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterFlexible IO Tester 3.1Type: Sequential Write - IO Engine: Windows AIO - Buffered: No - Direct: Yes - Block Size: 4KB - Disk Target: Default Test DirectoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629910K20K30K40K50KMin: 49500 / Avg: 49700 / Max: 49800Min: 58800 / Avg: 59733.33 / Max: 60300\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.11, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 3120.38143.86\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 120.23 / Avg: 120.38 / Max: 120.6Min: 142.78 / Avg: 143.86 / Max: 144.56\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162998K16K24K32K40KSE +/- 28.28, N = 3SE +/- 140.83, N = 330817.6236829.20\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIOPS, More Is BetterDiskspd 2.0.17Threads Per Target: 1 - Write Requests (Percent): 50 - File Size: 1M - Block Size: 4KBWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162996K12K18K24K30KMin: 30779.94 / Avg: 30817.62 / Max: 30872.99Min: 36551.23 / Avg: 36829.2 / Max: 37007.55\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629911002200330044005500SE +/- 20.49, N = 3SE +/- 18.30, N = 35008.254234.03\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162999001800270036004500Min: 4967.79 / Avg: 5008.25 / Max: 5034.17Min: 4197.9 / Avg: 4234.03 / Max: 4257.2\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 3.12, N = 3SE +/- 2.31, N = 31501.091215.36\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Read PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500Min: 1497.63 / Avg: 1501.09 / Max: 1507.31Min: 1210.75 / Avg: 1215.36 / Max: 1217.83\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 4.92, N = 6SE +/- 2.71, N = 6125.35120.17\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 1MB - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100Min: 114.57 / Avg: 125.35 / Max: 143.4Min: 115.41 / Avg: 120.17 / Max: 132.89\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 3.26, N = 6SE +/- 2.46, N = 6121.90121.87\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterIOzone 3.465Record Size: 4Kb - File Size: 8GB - Disk Test: Write PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100Min: 114.52 / Avg: 121.9 / Max: 136.79Min: 113.55 / Avg: 121.87 / Max: 126.55\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 10 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299160320480640800SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.75, N = 3713.99722.93\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 10 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299130260390520650Min: 713.33 / Avg: 713.99 / Max: 714.46Min: 721.92 / Avg: 722.93 / Max: 724.39\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMFLOPS, More Is BetterFFTE 6.0Test: N=256, 1D Complex FFT RoutineWindows Server 201617003400510068008500SE +/- 7.61, N = 37748.60\nOpenBenchmarking.orgCycles Per Byte, Fewer Is BetterBLAKE2 20170307Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299246810SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.36, N = 68.068.05\nOpenBenchmarking.orgCycles Per Byte, Fewer Is BetterBLAKE2 20170307Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162993691215Min: 8.06 / Avg: 8.06 / Max: 8.06Min: 6.65 / Avg: 8.05 / Max: 9.43\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994K8K12K16K20KSE +/- 169.58, N = 3SE +/- 7.86, N = 31981112061\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: httpWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162993K6K9K12K15KMin: 19615 / Avg: 19811.33 / Max: 20149Min: 12050 / Avg: 12060.67 / Max: 12076\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992M4M6M8M10MSE +/- 17633.34, N = 3SE +/- 4044.28, N = 387519288429502\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: jsonWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991.5M3M4.5M6M7.5MMin: 8724648 / Avg: 8751928 / Max: 8784924Min: 8424086 / Avg: 8429502.33 / Max: 8437413\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162998000M16000M24000M32000M40000MSE +/- 356690122.40, N = 3SE +/- 1482090467.07, N = 62611338990038962614900\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: buildWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162997000M14000M21000M28000M35000MMin: 25452656100 / Avg: 26113389900 / Max: 26676687400Min: 36980916000 / Avg: 38962614900 / Max: 46298448500\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299400K800K1200K1600K2000KSE +/- 5732.75, N = 3SE +/- 4806.39, N = 317746681711268\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNanoseconds/Operation, Fewer Is BetterGo BenchmarksTest: garbageWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299300K600K900K1200K1500KMin: 1767441 / Avg: 1774668 / Max: 1785990Min: 1702455 / Avg: 1711268 / Max: 1718999\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162995001000150020002500SE +/- 35.67, N = 4SE +/- 9.08, N = 42394.632292.13\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299400800120016002000Min: 2317.65 / Avg: 2394.63 / Max: 2457.65Min: 2272.63 / Avg: 2292.13 / Max: 2315.77\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 5.26, N = 4SE +/- 5.00, N = 41431.361365.60\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500Min: 1416.55 / Avg: 1431.36 / Max: 1438.85Min: 1354.02 / Avg: 1365.6 / Max: 1373.95\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299400800120016002000SE +/- 19.09, N = 4SE +/- 18.41, N = 41704.841612.48\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500Min: 1653.31 / Avg: 1704.84 / Max: 1744.24Min: 1583.51 / Avg: 1612.48 / Max: 1665.94\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162995001000150020002500SE +/- 6.74, N = 4SE +/- 54.90, N = 42362.512182.74\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299400800120016002000Min: 2345.81 / Avg: 2362.51 / Max: 2378.8Min: 2021.16 / Avg: 2182.74 / Max: 2266.7\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629911002200330044005500SE +/- 158.44, N = 4SE +/- 64.88, N = 45061.184959.53\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162999001800270036004500Min: 4755.19 / Avg: 5061.18 / Max: 5335.94Min: 4788.54 / Avg: 4959.53 / Max: 5101.67\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 2.39, N = 4SE +/- 2.95, N = 41413.251340.28\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterJava SciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000Min: 1409.11 / Avg: 1413.25 / Max: 1417.4Min: 1333.07 / Avg: 1340.28 / Max: 1347.52\nOpenBenchmarking.orgKpos / sec, More Is BetterFhourstones 3.1Complex Connect-4 SolvingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 2.49, N = 3SE +/- 8.84, N = 310766.5010408.97\nOpenBenchmarking.orgKpos / sec, More Is BetterFhourstones 3.1Complex Connect-4 SolvingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KMin: 10762 / Avg: 10766.5 / Max: 10770.6Min: 10399 / Avg: 10408.97 / Max: 10426.6\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: ReadWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 3.55, N = 3SE +/- 6.90, N = 39527.029009.02\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: ReadWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629917003400510068008500Min: 9520.26 / Avg: 9527.02 / Max: 9532.26Min: 9000.84 / Avg: 9009.02 / Max: 9022.73\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162995K10K15K20K25KSE +/- 12.48, N = 3SE +/- 56.47, N = 325588.7124325.97\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994K8K12K16K20KMin: 25564.7 / Avg: 25588.71 / Max: 25606.63Min: 24262.57 / Avg: 24325.97 / Max: 24438.61\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629911K22K33K44K55KSE +/- 38.78, N = 3SE +/- 123.54, N = 349349.1647015.64\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterCacheBenchTest: Read / Modify / WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162999K18K27K36K45KMin: 49274.9 / Avg: 49349.16 / Max: 49405.67Min: 46777.94 / Avg: 47015.64 / Max: 47192.92\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299110220330440550SE +/- 1.56, N = 3SE +/- 3.53, N = 3487.32439.51\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: CompositeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629990180270360450Min: 484.21 / Avg: 487.32 / Max: 489.16Min: 433.6 / Avg: 439.51 / Max: 445.82\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.27, N = 3123.59117.41\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Monte CarloWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100Min: 123.59 / Avg: 123.59 / Max: 123.59Min: 116.86 / Avg: 117.41 / Max: 117.68\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250SE +/- 1.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.21, N = 3218.47130.80\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Fast Fourier TransformWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200Min: 216.45 / Avg: 218.47 / Max: 219.9Min: 130.39 / Avg: 130.8 / Max: 131.03\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299130260390520650SE +/- 7.19, N = 3SE +/- 3.80, N = 3615.55572.44\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Sparse Matrix MultiplyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299110220330440550Min: 601.29 / Avg: 615.55 / Max: 624.2Min: 564.97 / Avg: 572.44 / Max: 577.39\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629990180270360450SE +/- 1.87, N = 3SE +/- 6.44, N = 3426.00393.41\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Dense LU Matrix FactorizationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629980160240320400Min: 422.48 / Avg: 426 / Max: 428.86Min: 380.95 / Avg: 393.41 / Max: 402.45\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000SE +/- 1.87, N = 3SE +/- 20.13, N = 31052.96983.49\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMflops, More Is BetterSciMark 2.0Computational Test: Jacobi Successive Over-RelaxationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000Min: 1049.23 / Avg: 1052.96 / Max: 1055.01Min: 943.34 / Avg: 983.49 / Max: 1006.19\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991.4M2.8M4.2M5.6M7MSE +/- 12276.60, N = 3SE +/- 7834.87, N = 364072976147034\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNodes Per Second, More Is BetterCrafty 25.2Elapsed TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991.1M2.2M3.3M4.4M5.5MMin: 6384290 / Avg: 6407297 / Max: 6426227Min: 6138116 / Avg: 6147033.67 / Max: 6162651\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 14.31, N = 397949791\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: BlowfishWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KMin: 9763 / Avg: 9791.33 / Max: 9809\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: Traditional DESWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162996M12M18M24M30MSE +/- 29242.28, N = 3SE +/- 13000.00, N = 32561633325719000\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: Traditional DESWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994M8M12M16M20MMin: 25559000 / Avg: 25616333.33 / Max: 25655000Min: 25693000 / Avg: 25719000 / Max: 25732000\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: MD5Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930K60K90K120K150KSE +/- 60.33, N = 3SE +/- 88.70, N = 3143147142068\nOpenBenchmarking.orgReal C/S, More Is BetterJohn The Ripper 1.8.0-jumbo-1Test: MD5Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920K40K60K80K100KMin: 143043 / Avg: 143147.33 / Max: 143252Min: 141933 / Avg: 142067.67 / Max: 142235\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-02-05H.264 Video EncodingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991428425670SE +/- 0.53, N = 6SE +/- 0.28, N = 336.7562.67\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is Betterx264 2018-02-05H.264 Video EncodingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991224364860Min: 34.87 / Avg: 36.75 / Max: 37.83Min: 62.13 / Avg: 62.67 / Max: 63.05\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: BlurWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100SE +/- 1.03, N = 468110\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: BlurWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100Min: 65 / Avg: 67.75 / Max: 70\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: SharpenWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 1.00, N = 369115\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: SharpenWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629920406080100Min: 68 / Avg: 69 / Max: 71\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: ResizingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 1.00, N = 3SE +/- 0.33, N = 391149\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: ResizingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 89 / Avg: 91 / Max: 92Min: 148 / Avg: 148.67 / Max: 149\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: HWB Color SpaceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 0.33, N = 3124167\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: HWB Color SpaceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 123 / Avg: 123.67 / Max: 124\nOpenBenchmarking.orgIterations Per Minute, More Is BetterGraphicsMagick 1.3.28Operation: Local Adaptive ThresholdingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629916324864807073\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162997K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 167.24, N = 3SE +/- 45.18, N = 32095234162\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMIPS, More Is Better7-Zip Compression 16.02Compress Speed TestWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162996K12K18K24K30KMin: 20674 / Avg: 20951.67 / Max: 21252Min: 34101 / Avg: 34161.67 / Max: 34250\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162997001400210028003500SE +/- 253.73, N = 627133055\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRecords/s, More Is Betterebizzy 0.3Windows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162995001000150020002500Min: 2284 / Avg: 2712.5 / Max: 3521\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162993691215SE +/- 0.16, N = 3SE +/- 0.00, N = 310.049.20\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterC-Ray 1.1Total TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162993691215Min: 9.75 / Avg: 10.04 / Max: 10.29Min: 9.2 / Avg: 9.2 / Max: 9.2\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 6.21e12 Prime Number GenerationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299918273645SE +/- 0.32, N = 3SE +/- 0.14, N = 341.5040.63\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPrimesieve 6.21e12 Prime Number GenerationWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299918273645Min: 40.96 / Avg: 41.5 / Max: 42.07Min: 40.36 / Avg: 40.63 / Max: 40.85\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterY-Cruncher 0.7.5.9481Calculating 500M Pi DigitsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991020304050SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.02, N = 345.4943.85\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterY-Cruncher 0.7.5.9481Calculating 500M Pi DigitsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299918273645Min: 45 / Avg: 45.49 / Max: 45.84Min: 43.82 / Avg: 43.85 / Max: 43.87\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAOBenchSize: 2048 x 2048 - Total TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991530456075SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.19, N = 363.9967.16\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterAOBenchSize: 2048 x 2048 - Total TimeWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991326395265Min: 63.96 / Avg: 63.99 / Max: 64.04Min: 66.96 / Avg: 67.16 / Max: 67.55\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 3.4.1H.264 HD To NTSC DVWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629948121620SE +/- 0.26, N = 4SE +/- 0.15, N = 316.238.38\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterFFmpeg 3.4.1H.264 HD To NTSC DVWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629948121620Min: 15.64 / Avg: 16.23 / Max: 16.89Min: 8.11 / Avg: 8.38 / Max: 8.62\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: GracefulWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991428425670SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.07, N = 358.2061.35\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: GracefulWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991224364860Min: 58.17 / Avg: 58.2 / Max: 58.26Min: 61.21 / Avg: 61.35 / Max: 61.44\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: SolitaireWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991530456075SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.72, N = 361.2967.23\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: SolitaireWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991326395265Min: 61.21 / Avg: 61.29 / Max: 61.35Min: 65.79 / Avg: 67.23 / Max: 68.07\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: QuasigroupWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.08, N = 3SE +/- 0.41, N = 3140.54147.61\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterMinion 1.8Benchmark: QuasigroupWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 140.41 / Avg: 140.54 / Max: 140.68Min: 146.89 / Avg: 147.61 / Max: 148.31\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162990.06530.13060.19590.26120.3265SE +/- 0.00149241, N = 3SE +/- 0.00020517, N = 30.267663440.29023436\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: Pod2htmlWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629912345Min: 0.27 / Avg: 0.27 / Max: 0.27Min: 0.29 / Avg: 0.29 / Max: 0.29\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162990.00820.01640.02460.03280.041SE +/- 0.00004768, N = 3SE +/- 0.00036338, N = 30.020797910.03630660\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterPerl BenchmarksTest: InterpreterWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629912345Min: 0.02 / Avg: 0.02 / Max: 0.02Min: 0.04 / Avg: 0.04 / Max: 0.04\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.1gRSA 4096-bit PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.34, N = 3SE +/- 0.15, N = 3134.03128.43\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSigns Per Second, More Is BetterOpenSSL 1.0.1gRSA 4096-bit PerformanceWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 133.6 / Avg: 134.03 / Max: 134.7Min: 128.2 / Avg: 128.43 / Max: 128.7\nOpenBenchmarking.orgHz, More Is BetterEuler3DCFD Cycle FrequencyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299246810SE +/- 0.04, N = 3SE +/- 0.17, N = 67.767.67\nOpenBenchmarking.orgHz, More Is BetterEuler3DCFD Cycle FrequencyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162993691215Min: 7.7 / Avg: 7.76 / Max: 7.82Min: 6.82 / Avg: 7.67 / Max: 7.88\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 0.07, N = 3SE +/- 0.49, N = 3161.82153.46\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegapixels/sec, More Is Betterlibjpeg-turbo tjbench 1.5.3Test: Decompression ThroughputWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 161.68 / Avg: 161.82 / Max: 161.89Min: 152.94 / Avg: 153.46 / Max: 154.43\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read OnlyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KSE +/- 1.27, N = 3SE +/- 269.33, N = 64171.229657.12\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read OnlyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992K4K6K8K10KMin: 4168.69 / Avg: 4171.22 / Max: 4172.6Min: 8580.65 / Avg: 9657.12 / Max: 10175.73\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 7.26, N = 3SE +/- 34.15, N = 6684.681301.33\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTPS, More Is BetterPostgreSQL pgbench 10.3Scaling: Buffer Test - Test: Single Thread - Mode: Read WriteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000Min: 676.41 / Avg: 684.68 / Max: 699.15Min: 1174.99 / Avg: 1301.33 / Max: 1377.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPOPWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 3042.06, N = 3SE +/- 8899.00, N = 3502869.63964855.08\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPOPWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299200K400K600K800K1000KMin: 496820.34 / Avg: 502869.63 / Max: 506457.31Min: 953561.5 / Avg: 964855.08 / Max: 982414.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SADDWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299170K340K510K680K850KSE +/- 272.51, N = 3SE +/- 10566.96, N = 3375714.25773906.83\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SADDWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299130K260K390K520K650KMin: 375319.03 / Avg: 375714.25 / Max: 376236.88Min: 752955.31 / Avg: 773906.83 / Max: 786782.06\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPUSHWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299140K280K420K560K700KSE +/- 2090.49, N = 3SE +/- 8514.50, N = 3304451.78645219.69\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: LPUSHWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299110K220K330K440K550KMin: 302315.75 / Avg: 304451.78 / Max: 308632.44Min: 630397.81 / Avg: 645219.69 / Max: 659891.75\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: GETWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299200K400K600K800K1000KSE +/- 156.33, N = 3SE +/- 17486.95, N = 3514809.441012261.88\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: GETWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299200K400K600K800K1000KMin: 514615.09 / Avg: 514809.44 / Max: 515118.72Min: 994233.5 / Avg: 1012261.88 / Max: 1047230.13\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SETWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299160K320K480K640K800KSE +/- 340.40, N = 3SE +/- 8372.12, N = 3358685.00747868.58\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterRedis 3.2.1Test: SETWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299130K260K390K520K650KMin: 358294.53 / Avg: 358685 / Max: 359363.22Min: 735132 / Avg: 747868.58 / Max: 763650.25\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: DiskWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 12.79, N = 6SE +/- 8.80, N = 6134.18146.99MIN: 84.84 / MAX: 172.23MIN: 113.54 / MAX: 176.46\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: DiskWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150Min: 84.84 / Avg: 134.18 / Max: 172.23Min: 113.54 / Avg: 146.99 / Max: 176.46\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: MemoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162997K14K21K28K35KSE +/- 435.83, N = 3SE +/- 58.95, N = 327583.5932336.64MIN: 26713.21 / MAX: 28059.49MIN: 32274.54 / MAX: 32454.48\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMB/s, More Is BetterWinSATTest: MemoryWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162996K12K18K24K30KMin: 26713.21 / Avg: 27583.59 / Max: 28059.49Min: 32274.54 / Avg: 32336.64 / Max: 32454.48\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: BMW27 - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629970140210280350332.03330.10\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterBlender 2.79aBlend File: Barbershop - Compute: CPU-OnlyWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994008001200160020001701.291680.47\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299400800120016002000SE +/- 6.96, N = 3SE +/- 11.67, N = 316791814\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterPyBench 2018-02-16Total For Average Test TimesWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500Min: 1668 / Avg: 1679.33 / Max: 1692Min: 1796 / Avg: 1814.33 / Max: 1836\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299140280420560700SE +/- 3.03, N = 3648.59612.04\nOpenBenchmarking.orgRequests Per Second, More Is BetterNGINX Benchmark 1.9.9Static Web Page ServingWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299110220330440550Min: 607.92 / Avg: 612.04 / Max: 617.95\nOpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950K100K150K200K250KSE +/- 402.57, N = 3SE +/- 2619.71, N = 3244120229956\nOpenBenchmarking.orgScore, More Is BetterPHPBench 0.8.1PHP Benchmark SuiteWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629940K80K120K160K200KMin: 243448 / Avg: 244119.67 / Max: 244840Min: 226211 / Avg: 229956.33 / Max: 235002\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629948121620SE +/- 0.25, N = 3SE +/- 0.43, N = 612.7417.351. git version 2.16.2.windows.1\nOpenBenchmarking.orgSeconds, Fewer Is BetterGitTime To Complete Common Git CommandsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629948121620Min: 12.24 / Avg: 12.74 / Max: 13.05Min: 15.93 / Avg: 17.35 / Max: 18.881. git version 2.16.2.windows.1\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create FilesWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000SE +/- 3.16, N = 3SE +/- 10.02, N = 3650.271129.16\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create FilesWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000Min: 646.77 / Avg: 650.27 / Max: 656.58Min: 1109.39 / Avg: 1129.16 / Max: 1141.86\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create ThreadsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991224364860SE +/- 0.10, N = 3SE +/- 0.55, N = 352.3836.29\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Create ThreadsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162991020304050Min: 52.28 / Avg: 52.38 / Max: 52.57Min: 35.44 / Avg: 36.29 / Max: 37.31\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch ProgramsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299110K220K330K440K550KSE +/- 4.24, N = 3SE +/- 1864.10, N = 31345.10490681.07\nOpenBenchmarking.orgus Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Launch ProgramsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629990K180K270K360K450KMin: 1337.26 / Avg: 1345.1 / Max: 1351.83Min: 488265.93 / Avg: 490681.07 / Max: 494348.29\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory AllocationsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250SE +/- 0.69, N = 3SE +/- 2.65, N = 3205.25139.33\nOpenBenchmarking.orgNs Per Event, Fewer Is BetterOSBenchTest: Memory AllocationsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200Min: 203.88 / Avg: 205.25 / Max: 205.99Min: 134.03 / Avg: 139.33 / Max: 142.27\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 37.99, N = 6SE +/- 32.88, N = 6165.42198.91\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200Min: 58.95 / Avg: 165.42 / Max: 305.49Min: 115.37 / Avg: 198.91 / Max: 308.16\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629960120180240300SE +/- 38.12, N = 6SE +/- 82.11, N = 6207.45271.24\nOpenBenchmarking.orgTransaction Rate Per Second, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Request Response - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250Min: 99.88 / Avg: 207.45 / Max: 343.99Min: 107.51 / Avg: 271.24 / Max: 660.49\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 162992004006008001000SE +/- 0.15, N = 3SE +/- 0.24, N = 3784.89785.56\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Client To Server - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299140280420560700Min: 784.59 / Avg: 784.89 / Max: 785.08Min: 785.15 / Avg: 785.56 / Max: 785.98\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299150300450600750SE +/- 0.01, N = 3SE +/- 0.08, N = 3702.04707.78\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: TCP Stream - Server To Client - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299120240360480600Min: 702.02 / Avg: 702.04 / Max: 702.07Min: 707.64 / Avg: 707.78 / Max: 707.91\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299160320480640800SE +/- 0.03, N = 3SE +/- 0.03, N = 3714.74723.65\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMegabits/sec Throughput, More Is BetterNetperf 2.7.0Server: 192.168.1.55 - Test: UDP Stream - Server To Client - 10G - Duration: 60 SecondsWindows Server 2016Windows 10 Pro Build 16299130260390520650Min: 714.7 / Avg: 714.74 / Max: 714.81Min: 723.61 / Avg: 723.65 / Max: 723.71\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440Windows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 0.55, N = 3173.73MIN: 2 / MAX: 236\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMilliseconds, Fewer Is BetterOpenArena 0.8.8Resolution: 2560 x 1440 - Total Frame TimeWindows 10 Pro Build 16299510152025Min: 2 / Avg: 5.6 / Max: 19\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterUnigine Heaven 4.0Resolution: 1920 x 1080 - Mode: FullscreenWindows 10 Pro Build 162991632486480SE +/- 0.23, N = 370.30\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: LowWindows 10 Pro Build 1629950100150200250SE +/- 2.97, N = 3241.73MIN: 145 / MAX: 554\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: HighWindows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 3.46, N = 3192.70MIN: 112 / MAX: 449\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltraWindows 10 Pro Build 162994080120160200SE +/- 1.43, N = 3167.68MIN: 89 / MAX: 356\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames Per Second, More Is BetterXonotic 0.8.2Resolution: 3840 x 2160 - Effects Quality: UltimateWindows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.81, N = 3128.89MIN: 17 / MAX: 323\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 16299714212835SE +/- 0.33, N = 330.26\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 162997001400210028003500SE +/- 33.05, N = 33033.46\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 16299714212835SE +/- 0.11, N = 330.53\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Many Spheres - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 162997001400210028003500SE +/- 11.35, N = 33060.49\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.27, N = 3154.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 162995001000150020002500SE +/- 4.40, N = 32476.88\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 3.46, N = 6145.06\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiVoxels / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Volume - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 162995001000150020002500SE +/- 55.37, N = 62320.87\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.27, N = 3154.81\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 1920 x 1080Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 2.87, N = 31613.26\nOpenBenchmarking.orgFrames / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 16299306090120150SE +/- 0.00, N = 3142.86\nOpenBenchmarking.orgMiPolys / Sec, More Is BetterParaView 5.4.1Test: Wavelet Contour - Resolution: 3840 x 2160Windows 10 Pro Build 1629930060090012001500SE +/- 0.00, N = 31488.74\nTesting initiated at 2 April 2018 09:14 by user Administrator.\nTesting initiated at 2 April 2018 18:47 by user m_lar.


Newest 'f-stop aperture' Questions - Photography Stack Exchange\nExplain. A two full F/stop change to either side of the starting F/stop will either double or half the amount of light from the original F/stop. aperture f-stop asked Feb 15 '11 at 1:33\nnewest f-stop aperture questions feed\nf-stop aperture Related Tags\ncanon terminology video shutter learning calculations effective-aperture night-shooting powershot extender teleconverter iso fast-lenses glass blur camera-basics more related tags


Thaddeus Robeck | American Ninja Warrior Profile, History & Video Highlights | Ninja Guide\nThaddeus Robeck | American Ninja Warrior Profile, History & Video Highlights\nThaddeus Robeck's American Ninja Warrior Profile. Details of all their past runs on ANW, video clips on the course, training gym, age, height, a history of which seasons they have competed on, which obstacles they have previously attempted, UNAA & NNL local competition results, and more!\nThaddeus Robeck's runs on the American Ninja Warrior course & ANW Competition History\nANW Season 7 (2015) - Venice, California City Qualifiers #3 - Tilting Table\nANW Season 6 (2014) - Venice, California City Finals 00:02:26.91 5 #8 - Cannonball Alley\nANW Season 6 (2014) - Venice, California City Qualifiers 00:02:43.66 6 Hit Buzzer / Completed Course\nANW Ninja vs Ninja - Season 1 (2018) - Qualifying Week 7 Qualifying First Round The Expendabulls vs Lizard Kings Lost Lizard Kings\nAmerican Ninja Warrior Video Clips & Highlights of Thaddeus Robeck competing on ANW\nAt this time, we don't have any videos or highlights of Thaddeus Robeck's American Ninja Warrior (ANW) runs, for qualifying or finals courses.


Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Red Embroidered Vest, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Embroidery Bride Waistcoat for Girls\n4. Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Embroidered Red Vest, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Embroidery Bridegroom Waistcoat for Men\n5. Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Embroidered Pink Vest, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Embroidery Bridegroom Waistcoat for Men\n10. Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Embroidered Red Costume, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Embroidery Clothing for Boys\n18. Traditional Korean Handmade Court Hanbok Embroidered Clothing, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Embroidery Costume for Kids\n31. Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Embroidered Blue Formal Occasions Costume, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Clothing for Boys\n33. Traditional Korean Handmade Hanbok Embroidered Green Formal Occasions Costume, Asian Korean Apparel Hanbok Clothing for Boys\n39. Asian Korean National Handmade Formal Occasions Wedding Bride Clothing Embroidered White Waistcoat Hanbok Costume for Women\n40. Asian Korean National Handmade Formal Occasions Wedding Bride Clothing Embroidered Black Waistcoat Hanbok Costume for Women


Rob Turner – OSSFeed\nMarch 8, 2018 March 8, 2018 by Rob Turner\nFull Article : Tecmint – https://www.tecmint.com/setup-iscsi-target-and-initiator-on-debian-9/ In the data center world, large capacity Storage Area Networks (SAN) have become the minimum standard. As cloud providers and virtualization also continue to make massive impacts in the … Read more\nCategories TecmintTags Debian, iscsi, STORAGELeave a comment\nJanuary 25, 2018 January 25, 2018 by Rob Turner\nFull Article : Tecmint – https://www.tecmint.com/configuration-of-zone-minder-on-debian-9/ In an earlier article, the installation of the security monitoring system Zone Minder on Debian 9 was covered. The next step in getting Zone Minder working is to configure … Read more\nCategories TecmintTags ZoneMinderLeave a comment\nJanuary 23, 2018 January 23, 2018 by Rob Turner\nFull Article : Tecmint – https://www.tecmint.com/install-zoneminder-video-surveillance-software-on-debian-9/ Whether it’s in the home or the enterprise, physical security is always a foundational component of an all encompassing security policy. The usage of security cameras tends to be … Read more


Factory supplied for High End Cutlery Frosted Stainless Steel Cutlery export to Palestine Importers\nThe key to our success is "Good Product Quality, Reasonable Price and Efficient Service" for Frosted Stainless Steel Tableware,Novelty Design Stainless Steel Flatware,Matte Stainless Steel Knife and Fork. for each new and old customers with all the most excellent green services.\n"We believe in: Innovation is our soul and spirit. Excellent is our life. Shopper need to have is our God for Frosted Stainless Steel Cutlery. The product will supply to all over the world, such as: Belarus,Aruba,Yemen. The company attaches great importance to product quality and service quality based on the business philosophy "good with people genuine to whole world your satisfaction is our pursuit". We design merchandise according to customer's sample and requirements to meet the needs of the market and offer you different customers with customized service. Our company warmly welcomes friends at home and abroad to visit to discuss cooperation and seek common development!\nPrevious: China New Product for Multipurpose Stainless Steel Tableware Frosted Stainless Steel Cutlery export to Cocos (Keeling) Islands Importers\nNext: High reputation for Black Handle Stainless Steel Cutlery Frosted Stainless Steel Cutlery export to Madagascar Importers


Milwaukee Brewers Disney Mickey MLB Lanyard Clip Neck\nMilwaukee Brewers Disney Mickey MLB Lanyard Clip Neck Tag Strap Buckle\nMilwaukee Brewers Disney Mickey Mlb Lanyard Clip Reviews\nMilwaukee Brewers Disney Mickey Mlb Lanyard Clip Price Tracking\n1 stores are offering it on Ebay with coupon codes. Other top features are 1", sport and keychain clip length. Also milwaukee brewers disney mickey mlb lanyard is one of the best sellers in WinCraft and B in 2021.\nDisney Mickey Lanyard team spirit Disney lanyard. keep track keys, ID badges, while you favorite the officially for pride on go, this lanyard two design and logo.\nA clip the end allows you of a to your keys and easily. team screen cool way show off your Features: 17” length detachable 1” wide is 4” Nylon Screen print Two-sided design with team name and logo Key clip features detach & Disney Free First Shipping within USA.\nAll orders within 24hrs Day) of cleared 100% problem you have with the are to.\nRelated to Milwaukee Brewers Disney Mickey MLB Lanyard Clip Neck Tag Strap Buckle Keychain\nMilwaukee Brewers MLB Tailgate Grilling Apron Jersey T-shirt\nBARBEQUE APRON MILWAUKEE BREWERS COOPERSTOWN PRINT\nMLB Milwaukee Brewers Team Neck Tie NEW


Netware - Free Netware Software Download\nDeveloper: PureSoft - Download - Free\nNovell netware recovery software has designed to get back novell netware data even when netware volumes corrupted due to virus attack. Netware file recovery utility helps to recover novell data ever after hotfix table corruption. Novell Netware data


Anthony J. Visconti , Kejia Fang , Greg R. Schmidt , Duncan T. Moore\nAnthony J. Visconti, Anthony J. Visconti, Kejia Fang, Kejia Fang, Greg R. Schmidt, Greg R. Schmidt, Duncan T. Moore, Duncan T. Moore, } "All-plastic high-performance eyepiece design utilizing a spherical gradient-index lens", Proc. SPIE 9293, International Optical Design Conference 2014, 92930W (17 December 2014); doi: 10.1117/12.2074271; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2074271\nAnthony J. Visconti, Kejia Fang, Greg R. Schmidt, Duncan T. Moore, "All-plastic high-performance eyepiece design utilizing a spherical gradient-index lens," Proc. SPIE 9293, International Optical Design Conference 2014, 92930W (17 December 2014);


Halogen Women's AccessoriesSort by:Sort by featuredSort by newestSort by price: low to highSort by price: high to lowSort by saleSort by customer ratingSort57 itemsItem TypeBag CharmsBagsBeltsHatsScarves & WrapsWalletsWristletsColorBlackGreyWhiteBeigeBrownMetallicPurpleBlueGreenOrangePinkRedPriceUnder $25$25 – $50$50 – $100Find in StoreDulles Town Center (2 mi.)Tysons Corner Center (13 mi.)Montgomery Mall (17 mi.)The Fashion Centre at Pentagon City (24 mi.)4 colorsHalogen® Tasseled Leather Crossbody Bag$98.00134.6 out of 5 stars (13)2 colorsHalogen® Patent Leather Clutch$78.0064.2 out of 5 stars (6)2 colorsHalogen® Crossbody Clutch WalletWas: $68.00Now: $33.9850% offHalogen® 'Westlake - Cassie' Double Zip WristletWas: $68.00Now: $33.9850% off5 colorsHalogen® Skinny Leather Belt$28.00164.5 out of 5 stars (16)Halogen® Angled Leather Day ClutchWas: $78.00Now: $38.9850% off


HP DeskJet Archives | Page 16 of 16 | HP Printer Support - HP Printer Support\nHome » Archive by Category "HP DeskJet" (Page 16)\nHP DeskJet GT 5820 All-in-One Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP DeskJet 5820 Driver and Software for...\nHP DeskJet 1112 Printer Driver and Software\nHP DeskJet 1112 Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP DeskJet 1112 Driver and Software for FREE from...\nHP Deskjet 1050 All-in-One Printer Driver and Software\nHP Deskjet 1050 All-in-One Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP Deskjet 1050 Driver and Software for FREE...\nHP DeskJet 2130 All-in-One Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP DeskJet 2130 Driver and Software for FREE...\nHP Deskjet 1510 All-in-One Printer Driver and Software\nHP Deskjet 1510 All-in-One Printer Driver and Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP Deskjet 1510 Driver and Software for...\nHP Deskjet 1010 Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. pinter-drivershp.com – Download HP Deskjet 1010 Driver and Software for FREE from Our...\nHP DeskJet 2630 All-in-One Printer Driver and Software\nHP DeskJet 2630 All-in-One Printer Driver Software Download for Microsoft windows 32-bit and 64-bit And Macintosh Operation Systems. soft-hp.com – Download HP DeskJet 2630 Driver and Software for FREE...