While low interaction is a frequent critique of the game, I think most experienced players would tell you that you're not playing the game as effectively as you could.
First, I'm assuming you're playing the game without the Brink of War rules which add direct player conflict to the game.
Second, a large part of the subtlety of the game is the need to very carefully make decisions about role selection - optimally, you want to balance your selection against the roles you think other players will select while avoiding selections that benefit other players more than they benefit you (in other words, you want to maximize the value/activity you achieve during a term while minimizing the value/activity of your opponents).
Another subtle point is the need to review other player's tableaus for point scoring combos - when you see someone else's combo fall into place, it's generally advisable to move the game to its end (unless of course your own combo is up and running and superior).
The last tidbit that is typically overlooked is card denial.
In most games of RftG, the deck will be shuffled a few times, increasing the odds that your opponents will get the chance to play rarer cards that can shift the victory point totals significantly.
Holding on to cards that you intend to spend for a bit longer can mean that a useful card never sees play due to the timing of shuffles!
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/89/rjstreet
I think it is worth extending the answers already here, As a big fan of RTFG, I do not think there is low or no interaction with other players.
The thing is, that after the learning curve has been surpassed (it is a bit extended) you will find yourself responding to opponent actions or forcing him to do the same.
The model simply doesn't feature card taking (until extensions) nor a visible pool of card that players compete for.
As the game states, it is called Race For the Galaxy, thus you are all racing to build a better empire.
To anyone reading this, if you are a new player: Ever thought that "the game is too fast" or "I was about to play this or that card"?
That's precisely the point, you shouldn't look at your hand only and devise the most point combo, but rather look at your hand and your opponent's tableu
: that's the race condition right there; any advantage in developping, settling, trade, etc may give him the edge.
Finally about the takeovers , I will add that while it is true that they allow for direct interaction, they are used rarely at least in all the games I've seen, simply because there's always an alternative to them.
Even if there are takeovers it doesn't happen more than 1 or twice in a 4+ players game.
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/3565/quinestor
The key interaction that we've found has been the timing of production and consumption roles.
If your opponent is always playing the consumption roles, they're getting a bunch of extra cards and points that you aren't.
Sometimes you have to play these roles a bit earlier than you would like, just to avoid getting scooped.
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/118/Don Kirkby
You can certainly place Race while in your own "bubble".
Many newbies do this since they're still learning and have too many things to worry about.
However, even though there's no direct or negative interaction (well, exp #2 and exp #3 add takeovers, but you can't always count on that anyways), being able to anticipate what others will call so you can leech off of them, and avoiding phases that help others, while calling phases that help you more are what separate those who win disproportionately more games vs. luck.
heck, uou can even play war games or their rough equivalent like Civilization the Board game, Small World, or Eclipse in your own bubble, but you especially want to pay attention to others here too.
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/8043/ackmondual
There's no "negative interaction" in this game.
Well, with Rebel Vs.
Imperium and Brink Of War expansions, the Takeover mechanic can be optional, and even when it is on, players need the appropriate cards for the TO powers, opponents need to be vulnerable (have certain conditions), and the aggressor needs to have sufficient military strength.
However, there are plenty of other interactions that'll help you play a better game by paying attention to others...
--obviously if someone has 10 to 11 cards on tableau, there's a good chance the game will end in 1 or 2 rounds, so you're better off "mad grabbing" for points than improving your engine.
Especially if those players have larger hand of cards --If the VP pool is low, and players are collectively sitting on mountains of goods with Consume powers, better pick an action card that'll get you the VP you need (e.g. II to build that 6-cost dev) --If
someone has no cards in hand, there's a decent chance Explore will get called.
If they have goods, you can likely count on a Consume Trade --If
you're looking for specific cards, like a 6-cost dev
.. seeing it on another player's tableau means you won't be getting it.
Likewise, the other devs only have 2 copies, so seeing both of them out means the same thing --If players have powers, they're likely to pick those to exploit those.
For example, military strength tends to do more settling of Military worlds, or Produce bonuses for the sheer card draw. --player
specific ones too, like how some people may call Explore a bit too much
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/8043/ackmondual
In Race For The Galaxy, I'm usually focused on my own cards, and only find out who wins during the scoring at the end of the game.  Is this a feature of the game — that is, is it low on interaction? Or is my strategy inadequate?
Interaction in Race For The Galaxy
boardgames.stackexchange.com
<race-for-the-galaxy>
boardgames.stackexchange.com/questions/149
boardgames.stackexchange.com/users/31/Michiel de Mare
Low interaction is a frequent critique but you are probably not playing the game as effectively as you could. There are plenty of interactions that will help you play a better game. Low interaction is a frequent critique of the game, but more experienced players would disagree and suggest that you're not playing the game as effectively as you could. One key interaction is the timing of production and consumption roles. There are also plenty of other interactions that will help you play a better game by paying attention to others. 
There is no "negative interaction" in this game.  
Low interaction is a frequent critique of the game, bu more experienced players would disagree and suggest that you're not playing the game as effectively as you could. One key interaction is the timing of production and consumption roles. There are also plenty of other interactions that will help you play a better game by paying attention to others. There is no "negative interaction" in this game.  