Fewer (about 20%) also have quantitative indicators that can be used to assess progress (e.g. Antigua and Barbuda, and Costa Rica). Monitoring points for those indicators in the lifecycles of adaptation actions also considerably vary among the INDCs (i.e. input, output, outcome or impact indicators). Since the NAP processes may include a monitoring and reporting component, its content could inform countr ies’ effort to enhance transparency for adaptation action. Some INDCs (e.g. Brazil and Honduras) refer to their NAPs that they are currently developing, and mention that detailed information on adaptation actions will be provided once the NAPs have been completed.