This compares with around 5.7% for the health sector, 11% for education and 0.29% for social welfare (UNICEF, 2013). Ideally, such an analysis should also be undertaken for biodiversity conservation and sustainable use more generally, including mainstreaming. The various components are highlighted in Box 2.5. The PIR also reviews the overall financing architecture for biodiversity in the country and generates specific recommendations for an improved institutional framework.