This paper aims to demonstrate the interrelationship between the rules  of criminal law and disciplinary administrative law and in this context, the  complex functionality of substantive law and procedural law, extended to  the administrative act, the procedure and the Public Administration process  for the concretion of fundamental rights as an expression of action and  state justice through the punitive process. It asks whether there is mutual  influence between state legal and punitive branches and to what extent this  phenomenon is relevant to interpreters and appliers of Law. With the concept  of purposive identity between criminal law and disciplinary law, this  paper seeks to shed light on the punitive dialogical systemic of the State, to  conclude that procedural law and substantive law are complementary, not overlapping, to ensure the fairness of administrative decisions, as the essence of “action- activity” punitive-  -disciplinary Public Administration.