That since the girl consistently had sexual intercourse with the Appellant, the relationship continued for quite a long time to the extent that age became a non-issue. The judge faulted the prosecution for not going to lengths to prove that the Appellant had not taken the necessary due diligence to find out that the complainant was below the age of 18 years. The judge also stated that the appellant should not be condemned for the voluntary acts of the complainant as she was enjoying the sex relationship.