First, there was criticism of the designation used by the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security to classify programme beneficiaries as “employable” or “unemployable” because it might serve to entrench a set of socio-economic differences historically produced and reproduced by inequitable and non-inclusive social structures (Campos, Faur and Pautassi, 2007). Second, there were misgivings that the “unemployable” category comprised mainly women of childbearing age with dependent children, which tended to divide exits from the programme along gender lines. Third, the fact that the solution for the “unemployable” group entailed a requirement to meet certain conditions, unlike the solutions offered to the other two groups, was a matter of concern from a rights standpoint.