The UNHCR is also alleged to have compromised its protection function by being a willing tool for the containment policies of its major donors (developed states), thus undermining the palliative role of refugee protection (Barutciski, 1996, Barutciski and Suhrke, 2001, Cuncliffe and Pugh, 1997, 1999, Frelick, 1992,1993, Goodwin-Gill, 1999, Hathaway, 1995). The rise of intra-state conflict and the non-entree policies of states have led to greater numbers of IDPs (Lewis, 1992: 699, UNGA Res. Some argue that it would be impracticable and immoral for UNHCR to distinguish between refugees and IDPs when distributing aid because of the complex and regional nature of modern armed conflicts, which have produced greater numbers of IDPs as forced displacement has been used as a deliberate tactic of war and where refugees and IDPs from different countries often intermix (Lanz, 2008: 205, Mooney, 1999: 201). It is now widely recognized,” Crisp (ibid.)