Compared to other monitoring areas (staff quality and child development), service quality is relatively frequently monitored for accountability purposes with sanctions or rewards attached to the results (this is done by 17 jurisdictions). In Norway, for example, settings that do not meet the regulatory minimum quality standards can lose funding or have to reimburse at least some of the public funding received. Monitoring the level of quality is also conducted for accountability reasons without any rewards or sanctions in 9 out of 24 jurisdictions. In Finland, France and Mexico, no sanctions or rewards are imposed based on monitoring results, while in England and Scotland (United Kingdom), for instance, they are.