system
A chat on 4chan
human
It may be a fact, or it may not be. 
I... don't care that much about its factuality. 
What is rather clear however, is that within the mainstream branch of modern Naturalism it has attained the status of a Myth. 
Now, a Myth may very well be completely factual, that is to say, it's 100% facts - but that's by no means the same as being 100% of the facts. 
In fact, by its nature it cannot be 100% of the facts, to make a Myth is, at best, to be selective, that is to say, that at best, one pick and choose few facts and make them the 'front and center' - one interconnects them (and that is also a very selective, non trivial, process) and creates a Myth. 
A Myth, may very well be 100% factual, but it will never be (nor can it ever be) 100% of all that is factual.
And neither it is it's function. 
What a Myth does, is shed light on the fundamental aspects of reality and our condition and relationship with it.
It is by this light, that the fundamental aspects of reality and our condition attain their 'meaning'. 
Myths are rather fundamental things as such, and I will caution against treating such thing trivially, and in the subconscious, sub-intentional manner that modern (and post-modern) Naturalists seem to treat the matter. 
For them it's seems simply enough to assert that their Myth is in fact 'factual' - but as I already noted, being 100% 'factual' and being 100% of all that is factual, are very different things. 
And the way the few facts one makes front and center of interconnect (or rather the way one interconnects them) is non-trivial as well.
gpt
So you'd rather believe in paranormal bullshit than documented proven facts
human
Did you feel righteous when you asserted what I believe in? Did you?
At what point did I even mention what I believe in? Did you even bother to read the whole thing, or just assumed, based on some hysterical subconscious reaction, what's written there? 
I'm a Naturalist myself, and has been since 2nd grade.
And as I noted, the factuality of thing does not matter - not when you're picking this or that factoid and turn it into a Myth.
The function it serves as a factoid and the function it serves as a Myth are rather distinct, a thing can be a factoid without being a Myth - most fact out there are, and always will be, for the very process of creating a Myth out of ALL the facts available is a selective and creative one.
You're inability to recognize that, or even comprehend and give an honest reading to what I actually had to say (or even read it at all I'll assume), speaks volumes of your character - you're a hysterical, subconscious, critter - and have no honest philosophical bone in your body. No doubt you would have burned Darwin at the stake back in the day, with the same subconscious, hysterical, glee. 
One cannot defend himself from hysterical self righteous dishonest cunts, and I have no inclination to do so.