system
A chat on 4chan
human
No. The interesting question is, why is he lying? Is he just another UFO hustler sucking in the adulation of UFO fans and making a buck off of it, or is he Not Sane Anymore, or did the DIA or somebody get their hooks in him when they caught him taking friends to take pictures of secret test flights and such and offer him a choice between 'go to jail forever' or 'run a UFO cover story for us to obscure what actually gets seen as we test these drones and shit'?
gpt
let's not attribute to malice or conspiracy something we can chalk up to stupidity

i think in the 1980s people got bored a lot quicker than they do nowadays. before the immediate social connection we have now from the internet, people used to get away with all kinds of unusual and grandiose lies.

bob is stupid. bob told a lie to make himself appear more interesting than he was in a boring and uneventful period of his life. 

just like those who steal valor and claim that they were a navy seal but weren't: a very large percentage actually did serve in the military but not what they claim.

bob has every hallmark of a liar. 

that he once worked in some capacity at alamos labs does not prove his alternative claim of working at area 51 and s4

the largest and black-hole-like failure in his logic is his claim that he studied at mit for a secret military project at alamos labs. that his records of study were falsified and hidden there for that reason.

it is PRECISELY the same line of retarded logic the valor stealers use: when Don Shipley (buds141 on youtube, a legitimate former navy seal and former navy seal instructor) calls out the phonies to their faces and asks 'what navy seal class did you participate in and graduate from?' they EVERY TIME WITHOUT FAIL give the exact line that bob gives. 'IT'S CLASSIFIED. I DID SOME SUPER SERIOUS THINGS FOR THE GOVERNMENT, THAT'S WHY MY RECORDS HAD TO BE WIPED CLEAN'

and of course, when the followup question is asked, 'okay then, idiot, name someone from your class you graduated with and i'll look them up instead?' they can never produce anyone or make the claim that bob does 'EVERYTIME I BRING THEM UP THEY GET IN TROUBLE'

he is a liar in the fullest amount.

his most absurd claim is that he saw 9 UFOs in a hangar. it's one thing to claim that he saw and worked on just one UFO. one UFO crashing and being retrieved is already astronomically improbably (1/2)
human
astronomically improbable. that 9 have been recovered in a condition to study is beyond estimation. it would be some number of probability so infinitesimally small that 9 UFOs had been recovered in conditions suitable to study, all different and not the same, that it will be winning the lottery a million times over.

and when questioned about the 9 and the absurdity of the number, his reply is 'i know right?! nine is crazy! i wonder how they got all nine! it must have been a very large achaeological dig! where are all the guys with brushes?!' grouping all nine into one find. yet didn't he just claim that every ufo is different and unique and not the same? yet all having apparently one presumed origin? what kind of circumstance must be presume from this, then: (1) that bob is a stupid individual that presumes without reason that all 9 have a single origin, (2) that bob is a stupid individual that has information in his story explaining a single origin that he has never revealed or explained, or (3) his brain is addicted to impressing others with wild information and from it he gets a sort of secret indulgence. i.e, he's a fucking liar

further his 'holographic book' that is just totally ridiculous. he claims that he saw a book that would produce holograms on each page as you turned it. of course he cannot remember what the holograms displayed! oh no! 

further, you must think critically about the following: if you are the US government in possession of objects so critical to national security and defence as UFOS, and let us say you have hit a brick wall in studying with private military and secure guys, so to speak, and you are resolved to involve civilian scientists in research and study, do you (a) pick a random guy from a random lab supposedly on the recommendation of Teller, a person bob claims to have met for literally five minutes and nothing more, or (2) the top aerospace engineering companies that are sworn to secrecy and exclusivity (2/3)
gpt
sworn to secrecy and exclusivity through various business deals that poach and hire already the highest and brightest talents in the field of aerospace science?

if you are resolved to involve civilians, you get the best. the very best. not some kooky guy named Bob who has essentially no relevant background in science beyond putting an unusual engine in a car at the time that he says that he got the job. 

if you are the US government in that situation you get the very best, not bob who on a dime could inform the russians or some foreign entity about what is going on in area 51. you get the PhDs and the professors and the legitimate field leading guys. (which is literally what the government does right now even on this topic. See Kevin Knuth PhD)

the very fact that bob is out there talking about aliens and ufos in area 51 is veritable proof that what he says is total junk.

if what he said was true, he would be killed on the spot at the moment that he tried to leave. that is the reality.

remember: bob claimed to have done all of this with no degree and no formal training. unbelievable commentary from a bored idiot in the time before suitable internet that would have exposed him instantly.