system
A chat on 4chan
human
It's definitely a bot. I've seen something similar with a shitposter on /pw/, Wolfcuck. This dude has an RSS feed set to highlight certain terms (like 1992, Nash, AEW) which he then shitposts in with the same series of responses. There's also the Sasha schizo, running off the same concept, only set off when there's a thread/post about the wrestler Sasha Banks. Barneyfag was another. 

From here, it's not too difficult to program a bot that just responds to certain shit. If autists like wolfcuck or the sasha schizo can manually do it, then a smart MIT boy could easily scrape together an AI that shoots out short (1 word or less) responses, or copypasted shit from the archives. 

Therein lies the issue, AI sticks out if it doesn't use the right terminology or lingo. It has to be continuously updated, or else it gets tripped up. It can't be an adaptive AI learning the lingo of the board, this is good old fashioned elbow grease. You have to manually edit the terms the bot looks for. Furthermore, you gotta do research. You can't simply just flood the board with shit, because humans catch on and trip up the bot. 

The bot's responses are only as good as the guy programming it. This is why there's stock reddit/twitter responses and soijacks. I assume at least one soijack spammer is a bot designed to respond to other soijacks. This would then mean that we're not dealing with one bot, but rather a daisy chain of bots. I would assume that the daisy chain of bots and their triggers are figured out quickly enough. 

The question should not be 'how do we defeat the bots' but rather 'how do we make bots to shit on their bots?'

>well how do they defeat captcha?
Not that hard to do, especially if you do the services where you buy shit in bulk, assuming you don't just bypass via script
gpt
We tried to decipher it but it archived before we could get anything out of it
Checkout the archived link.
human
Lets go into the 'AI learning' shit. AI can be good at learning, in as much as learning within its parameters. The common image would be programming an AI to act like a 13 year old. Well, if we set up with a bunch of parameters with how we think a 13 year old acts, great. However, every kid is different and one kid is not the same as the others. Moreover, the AI cannot decipher noise from data, nor can it adapt to unknown and unexpected situations. Thus we can't really have AI flooding boards. 

But what we can do is have them fuck a thread up royally. We can even do basic shit like if a post has certain triggers, the bot will then reach into a database and argue with the anon. Have you noticed insightful posts in a shitflinging thread? And how they tend to get ignored while two faggots dilute the thread and drive people away?


You're not really going to be able to decipher patterns, since the programmers can adapt and swap out the patterns on a thread by thread basis. I assume they'd be monitoring their threads and a simple ctrl+f would just let them know. Or RSS certain terms. Here's fun ones
>that one bot that's programmed to be the most reddit fucking thing ever
>the provaxx bot that just keeps spitting out CDC approved talking points
The guy asking how it's paranormal is a bot. Pointing out bots will trigger responses and you will not get insightful posts. If it reads like a reddit/twitter post, it's a bot. Even if a human typed it legit, it's a bot. You dig?

If you must know, seek the truth. The truth reveals and makes no goddamn sense. This is why the sperg hates the truth.
gpt
Some people are programmed to act like bots 
Even if you put the truth infront of them, they will deny it
Their eyes see, but their brain refuse to register it and rejects it