system
A chat on 4chan
human
You just need to get more conversant with Scripture. It is said in Psalm 51:16-17 that God does not delight in sacrifice and does not take pleasure in burnt offerings. The Bible is clear that God doesn’t *need* anything (Acts 17:25, etc). The Bible can be read on multiple levels. The system of sacrifices is typological, i.e. it prefigures the sacrifice of Christ on the cross, and this is why the Temple was destroyed and the sacrifices ended when Christ came in the flesh. God promised His people prosperity if they obeyed Him and followed Him faithfully, and not borrowing from other nations is a way to keep them from being ensnared by pagan foreigners. Even so, the Israelites were rebellious and often quite evil, so they were overtaken anyway. You just can’t accept the Lord on His own terms, so instead you mix in Satanism
gpt
You're right about one thing. I can't accept Saturn as my lord.

But you're right, it confuses the shit out of me. Considering that theres a direct geneological chart in the OT saying when the messiah would be born.

BUT what bugs me is that, jews chose to not follow the chosen messiah, but how can you blame them, since the OT was a direct opposition to the teachings of Christ.
human
>BUT what bugs me is that, jews chose to not follow the chosen messiah, but how can you blame them, since the OT was a direct opposition to the teachings of Christ.
Many Jews *did* indeed follow Christ when he came, though. It’s important to remember that. This is a common theme in the history of this people, and we can see it encapsulated in the story of Jacob wrestling with God, for which he is named ‘Israel’—which is a name designating struggle with God. The entire OT seems to be deal with this theme of rebellion, of falling away from God and worshiping idols and demons over the true God. In Deuteronomy 9:13 God calls the Israelites a stiff-necked and stubborn people and in Exodus 32:22, Aaron says of the Israelites–“You know the people, that they are set on evil.” This continues today. We can only hope that they again come to know God in the future, because he who does not know the Son does not know the Father.

Jesus teachings are certainly in accordance though. The New Covenant was foretold long before Christ in Jeremiah 31, among other places. Jesus reveals the deeper meanings behind aspects of the OT law, such as summing up the law and the prophets in the commandment to love your neighbor as yourself and God with your whole heart, which is practically applied via treating others as you wish to be treated—“for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.” (Matthew 7:12). Romans 13:8-10 is also clear that loving your neighbor is the fulfillment of the law. The law is spiritualized and summed up in the New Covenant, for the New Covenant is not for the lawless. Aspects of the Old point to the New, and it is not a total break, it is a higher form.
gpt
Interesting take and you make some good points.

I'll just never get behind the OT God after knowing he told the hebrews to lend to all nations and lord over them (Deuteronomy 15:6). It's just too much of a stretch to say, 'yeah, Jesus might have been preaching opposite principles and opposed the pharisees, but him and YHWH are the same being'. 

That's a tough take for me. I'll sit on it.
human
It’s important to keep a few things in mind with that. When we read it off the bat, we instantly think of scheming Jews who only trade among their ethnic group. This isn’t the society of ancient Israel though. The Israelites were predominantly of one nation, but they were never racially exclusive in the sense we think of modern Jews. There is a lot of evidence for this. Esther 8:17 is a good example, because it mentions that “many people of other nationalities became Jews because fear of the Jews had seized them.” By renouncing their paganism, they would be accepted as one of the people. Even Moses, as we know, had a non-Israelite, Midianite wife, Zipporah. There’s a mention of him having a Cushite wife too, which may or may not be the same woman. And then there is Ruth and Rahab, non-Israelite ancestors of Jesus Christ. Ancient Israel was much more open to converts than some people think. We also know that the Psalms speak of a day when the entire world would turn to the God of Israel (Psalm 22:27-28, Psalm 86:8-10). I am wondering if there is an alternate reading to that verse you mention. Does the Bible actually prohibit in total borrowing from non-Israelites, or is that verse a prediction of the potential prosperity of Israel, that they shall be in such a position where they do not have to borrow from foreigners to live. Indeed, one of consequences of disobedience, among many other bad events such as being scattered over the earth and sold into slavery is having to borrow from others in Deuteronomy 28:44. 15:6 is mentioned in the contexting as a blessing of being faithful too. Hmm