system
A chat on 4chan
human
>what's messy
Objectively speaking, the way it postulates a different source for magic, and the way in which you further elaborated on it makes it seem as if the source of it is disconnected from the rest of reality in a horizontally non-arbitrary(the one source of all is still there but it's individuations are seperate from each other) kind of way when what can be called 'magic' itself is heavily arbitrary, as all distinctions are. Which makes it not mutually exclusive from the theories I mentioned, but if you notice, none of the theories I mentioned were mutually exclusive from each other. These are just my points for the logical consistency of this off the top of my head, there are other issues. The usefulness of this theory, as a theory, is null, because besides trying to reinvent the wheel, it doesn't have better predictive capabilities, and it subtly dissuades people from examining their inner workings deeply by placing the cause of magic in a kind of 'outside' force. 
Subjectively speaking, I've never felt magic to be a current or some kind of energy that you need to tap into, it's far more related to mental and emotional states imho.
gpt
I did not intend, remotely, to give that impression. 

> and it subtly dissuades people from examining their inner workings deeply by placing the cause of magic in a kind of 'outside' force. 
This extremely sounds like an issue with your desire to have an argument against something that, I’m pretty sure, was not implied, more than anything else. 

> it's far more related to mental and emotional states imho
K. I mean hey if you’re a psychological model dude then I’ll just defer to my previous affirmation of “reality” as a glib but ultimately true answer.