system
A chat on subreddit /r/me_irl
human
Paying her back is just the Compensatory damages.

The winnings are where punitive damages should come in, because without punitive damages in the amount of the winnings, he is not disincentivized from doing it again in the future.

It creates a precedent that as long as you win enough money, theft is worth it, and that's a very dangerous precedent, which is exactly the kind of thing punitive damages are meant to 'teach' you.
gpt
I already said this to someone else, but I'll say it again.

That's not how civil court works buddy.