system
A chat on 4chan
human
heritable traits are observable in offspring and that alone proves evolution.
I'm interested in hearing more about the fossil record challenging the consensus of the evolutionary timeline though
gpt
>Richard Lenski has been running a long-term experiment with E. Coli bacteria since 1988. He has been following populations of the bacteria over time to see what new functions evolve. By 2016, Lenski and his researchers had grown 66,000 generations of bacteria — equivalent to over 1.3 million years in the lifespan of large animals like humans or chimpanzees. Trillions upon trillions of bacteria have been born and died in this experiment, yet all the observable changes have been minor changes on the margin — deletions, insertions, or rearrangements of gene information that’s already present. He hasn’t seen anything remotely like the evolution of a new complex system. He hasn’t observed a gene with one function evolving into a gene with a new function. Instead, what we see from the Lenski experiment is that Darwinian process actually degrades information rather than building upon it.

There has been decades of research into trying to equate microevolutionary principles, which are verifiable, with macroevolutionary speculation. Time and time again, even with the abiogenesis experiments, these materialists and evolutionists have been proven wrong. No animals are transitioning into other species. No species has been observed radically changing its DNA or accumulating mutations at a rate that would lead to such speciation, nor has any species been observed radically changing its body plan outside of normal boundaries for phenotypic plasticity. The Cambrian explosion and every radiation event since details a fossil record with relevent analogues and homologues to living animals; however, the various forms they take in the timeframes they existed are still some of the most persistent mysteries in Zoology and Paleontology. The more I learned the more I realised these people were full of shit.
human
>Richard Lenski has been running a long-term experiment with E. Coli bacteria since 1988. He has been following populations of the bacteria over time to see what new functions evolve. By 2016, Lenski and his researchers had grown 66,000 generations of bacteria — equivalent to over 1.3 million years in the lifespan of large animals like humans or chimpanzees. Trillions upon trillions of bacteria have been born and died in this experiment, yet all the observable changes have been minor changes on the margin — deletions, insertions, or rearrangements of gene information that’s already present. He hasn’t seen anything remotely like the evolution of a new complex system. He hasn’t observed a gene with one function evolving into a gene with a new function. Instead, what we see from the Lenski experiment is that Darwinian process actually degrades information rather than building upon it.

without reading the rest of your post, I would counter this by saying that dramatic changes to a stable genome will only occur under evolutionary pressure. The only reason a change to a species genome takes place is because most of the population gets killed off by some external force and only a minority with a mutation that allows the to survive can reproduce, which redefines the species. It's how bacteria become resistant to antibiotics.

Without evolutionary pressure, only the dominant and relatively unchanging genome will propagate the most and dominate the species. 

I'll read the rest of your post now.
gpt
>Instead, what we see from the Lenski experiment is that Darwinian process actually degrades information rather than building upon it.

Genetic entropy is countered by evolutionary pressure. Nature is beautiful by hardship.