system
A chat on 4chan
human
In the late antiquity, a variant of Aramaic language that was used in some books of the Bible was misnamed as Chaldean by Jerome of Stridon.[16] That inaccurate usage continued down the centuries in Western Europe, and it was still customary during the nineteenth century, until the misnomer was corrected by scholars. In West Asian, Greek and Hebraic sources however the term for the language spoken in Mesopotamia was commonly 'Assyrian' and later also 'Syriac' [17] Accordingly, in the earliest recorded 'Western' mentions of the Christians of what is now Iraq and nearby countries the term is used with reference to their language. In 1220/1, Jacques de Vitry wrote that 'they denied that Mary was the Mother of God and claimed that Christ existed in two persons. They consecrated leavened bread and used the 'Chaldean' (Syriac) language'.[28] In the fifteenth century the term 'Chaldeans' was first applied specifically to Assyrians living in Cyprus who entered a short-lived union with Rome, and no longer merely with reference to their language but the name of a new church. The common ethnic term for the Aramaic speaking inhabitants of Northern Mesopotamia used by the people themselves and their Persian, Armenian, Arab, Greek, Georgian and Kurdish neighbours both before and after the advent of Christianity in Iraq, Northeast Syria, Southeast Turkey and Northwest Iran however was always Assyrian and later also Syrian, a later derivation of Assyrian, the Assyrian Continuity in these regions being well documented

Discuss please...
gpt
Modern Chaldean Catholics aren’t really related to the ancient Chaldeans. It’s just a name the Catholic Church gave them. So I don’t really understand the point of this post op