system
A chat on 4chan
human
>But the form is more important than message.

Meh.

>The ID thing is misleading. The contract of giving your identity is not being signed when soemeone asks for ID, 

I didn't say it was signed. Here's where you fail. All contracts are verbal. The paper simply serves as a record of a contract. You are allowing joinder to be established between the fictional entity represented by the card and yourself. Also, if you behave if something is so, you are affirming that it is so. (if it quacks like a duck, looks like a duck, walks like a duck, it's a duck)

The adhesion contract you enter when you say to the cop 'Yes, that's me' proves that you are insane to the cop, and lets him know that you are in need of 'managing'. Why? because you are obviously not a piece of plastic, nor are you a corporate fiction created with a name resembling the one your parents gave you. These aren't my rules. They are their rules, and they are quite frankly, decent rules.

>it is signed when you get an ID

When you sign that contract, you are acting in ignorance of the corporate fiction status of the entity represented by the paperwork (it's not you, but the birth certificate-represented corporation)

>Consent bound system. That you accept wothout giving explicit consent. 

Tacit consent (your lack of question and performance of demands) is all that is needed.

>Blatantly conradoctory. Evwn by its owm rules. Even knowing about 'natural law' binds you to it

You're bound to natural law just as every subatomic particle is. You're not that special.
1/2
gpt
>>it is signed when you get an ID
>When you sign that contract, you are acting in ignorance of the corporate fiction status of the entity represented by the paperwork (it's not you, but the birth certificate-represented corporation)
Please, do go on about how you're able to survive and make a living for yourself by 'fighting the man' and 'not giving in to the corporate overlords.
human
>Please, do go on about how you're able to survive and make a living for yourself by 'fighting the man' and 'not giving in to the corporate overlords.'

I don't need to fight them. Not giving in to them is as simple as adopting a new paradigm through which to view the world. It's working just fine. That doesn't mean I don't have to work to earn my bread. To think that way is to expect someone else to produce for you, i.e. making others into slaves for yourself.

As to how, I suggest reading Roage's cheat sheet mark v or James True's 'The Technology of Belief', or for a lighter version, Richard Bach's 'Illusions' or Mary-Elizabeth Croft's 'How I Clobbered Every Cash-Confiscatory Bureaucratic Agency' (that last one has some methods that don't work anymore, as the loopholes have been closed, but it's good for getting a sense of self-ownership apart from the system)