system
A chat on subreddit /r/wallstreetbets
human
Fair point. I did reference it as highlights. And in a M&amp;A scenario which my bull thesis is built on , these are areas that could be significant to an acquirer. High customer acquisition, significant cost reductions in shipping, and cutting sg and a expenses which definitely happens in that scenario. I do also refer out to Biggy to check out the other areas.
gpt
I respect that your responses are civil btw 

However, the fact that you've already decided that a priori that there is going to be an M&amp;A makes me think your argument is very circular. 

Sure, those areas you highlighted are factors, but are they more important than the headline figures? I don't think you can objectively say they are, if you're being honest with yourself. You've isolated the positive, but minor, aspects of the report and ignored the overwhelmingly dreadful figures that dominate.  It's lacks a sense of proportion or balance that's all. If there is a potential acquirer, is it likely they would gloss over the most important information?