system
A chat on 4chan
human
> If from generation to generation we are DEGENERATING
Oh wow, word in all caps, that means it must be true.
>Source on these simulations please
Literally search it, takes less than 10 seconds.
>The total amount of information in the cells still is decreasing.
First off, source. Secondly, more data doesn't mean better, efficiency is at the core of natural selection. Less data being more effective at spreading it's genes means it's better data. You have a childish view of the world.
gpt
Small adaptions happen, yes, but they are all in a certain range. Like I said, never, it was not even hinted, that one lifeform ever evolved into another. Some are similar to others but thats it. What Darwin observed was adaption in this range in which it is possible.
human
>The human brain is the most complex structure known to man
KEK, you really believe that? 'Complexity' is a human invention, things just are. Furthermore we can't even properly understand the particles and laws thatgovern the atom, it's impossible to make the assessment of something's 'complexity' when you don't even understand it. That sentence is just some popsci that's spouted by idiots who want to feel smart.

Because taxonomy is a bitch of a field, but you clearly see that a chihuahua is a different species from the wolf ancestors.
gpt
Ok, lets just say that there is 'more going on' inside of a human brain than inside of a unicellar organism, do you agree?
If those are our ancestors, major changes must have happened for us to be the way we are today. We havent observed this happening, but the opposite, do you know what I am saying? 
The total amount of information is getting less but it should be getting more. Even when these small adaptions happen, it means that information gets lost for good. It was never observed that one type of animal evolved into another nor is there any hint that it is possible. 
Every lifeform degenerates over time, meaing, the total amount of information is getting less. I hope you know what Im trying to say.
human
>do you agree?
Sure, you can't really compare the number of functions in a single cell to the number of functions in multiple cells.
>major changes must have happened for us to be the way we are today
No, minor changes, each one stacked one on top of the other.
>We havent observed this happening, but the opposite, do you know what I am saying?
I know and you are wrong. There isn't any 'should' when it comes to natural selection. Simpler designs, aka, those with less moving parts, will, if able to do the same or an almost as good job, always dominate because they have less points of failure. You don't understand the most basic principles of design. KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID, or KISS as architects, engineers, programmers and developers call it.

'More' doesn't mean 'better'.
>It was never observed that one type of animal evolved into another nor is there any hint that it is possible.
Wolves, chihuahuas. Fish, air breathing fish. Lizards, salamanders.

You just don't know some of the animals that are on what can be considered 'transitive periods'. Neither are you taking into consideration the philosophical question about changing wood planks in a ship.
gpt
How did these minor changes happen? Even if over time, there has to be a rate by which the complexity increases.
Do you even consider anything I am saying? If the total amount of information in an organism is decreasing from generation to generation, it is completely impossible that our existence now can be the result of evolution. 
If you think logically, you have to assume that Everything came to be at some point and degenerated to the point where we are now.

It is a bit frustrating and I dont know if you are trolling or not, but what I say is true. Even if a chihuahua and a wolf look similar or seem to be related species, there has to be some kind of mechanism that makes these changes possible. 
'Keep it simple!' Every single living organism is DEGENERATING from generation to generation! If you really want to look at it objectively then you must admit that evolution cant happen if this is true.
Even these minor changes go hand in hand with loss of total information. It is adaption within a frame. Never was it observed that one evolved into another. Even those 'links' can just be made like they are or those changes can be within a frame. 'within a frame' meaning that, at the beginning, when God made everything, the amount of total information was the highest and over time, from generation to generation they adapted and every change that happened was due to information that God already has put inside them and that they can not go back to their original forms, because that information is lost. Do you get what I mean?
1 Cellular organism = x information
humans = billion times x information

1 generation
2 generations
.
.
humans now = billion times x information MINUS 10 or whatever.

Do you get what Im trying to say?
The total amount of information MUST increase for evolution to be true.