system
A chat on 4chan
human
The Cathar Church was composed of Perfecti [“Perfect Ones”] and the faithful or “imperfect ones.” The latter were not constrained by the severe rules of the Perfecti in their condition as Pure Ones. They could do whatever suited them: marry, dedicate themselves to business, compose songs, go to war in sum, live their lives as one did in those days in Occitania. The name “Cathar” was reserved for those who, after a precisely prescribed period of preparation and through a sacramental act were initiated into the esoteric mysteries of their Church.

Cathars venerated Mary Magdalene. Allegedly the Cathars taught that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were husband and wife. They believed that Mary Magdalene travelled to Southern France after the events in the New Testament. Local Catholics believed that Mary Magdalene was buried there and claim the Cathars taught that Christ and the Magdalene were married.

Which is kinda weird you’d think that they would think that Jesus is pure and incorruptible but here he is married. From here there spring various myths about the Jesus bloodline and the Holy Grail and the Priory of Sion. According to the Book Holy Blood Holy Grail the Merovingian kings were descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdalene. The Priory of Sion was created to restore this royal line, assisted by its military and financial arm the Knights Templars. 

According to this theory, the Roman Catholic Church tried to kill off all remnants of Jesus' dynasty and their guardians, the Cathars of the Languedoc and the Templars. They did this through the Crusades against the Cathars and by establishing the Inquisition. Their objective was to maintain their own power (claimed through the apostolic succession of Peter in contrast to the hereditary succession of Mary Magdalene's children)
gpt
Why do churchfags defend Peter and Paul so vehemently? They all quote the 'you are my rock' line to defend them which I quite frankly don't really buy.
I tried making a thread about it in /x/ and it got deleted and I was given a warning.
human
>Paul
Saul was a lying sack of shit, he was scum before his 'conversion' and he continued to be scum after his 'conversion.'

And it's annoying, because most people named Paul are pretty chill. But he appropriated that too.
gpt
Already explained why and how Paul couldn't have been a liar given that scripture attests to the fact that Peter could spot a liar (ananias) through the power of the Holy Spirit and due to this would've done the same when meeting up with Paul.
human
m8 I'm not even Christian

Well that's a load of bullshit.