system
A chat on 4chan
human
Wait? The results showed they had human like mitochondria yet non human novel nuclear DNA? That's bizarre.
gpt
>human like mitochondria
neanderthal mitochondrial DNA I believe (female genes), if you consider them human
human
It copied poorly from the pdf so a bit of a mess, but this is just baffling.
>conclusion
>In summary,we have extracted, analyzed and sequenced DNA from over one hundred separate samples of hair, tissue, toenail, bark scrapings, salivaand blood obtained from scores of collection sites throughoutNorth America. Hair morphology wasnot consistent with human or any known wildlife hairs. DNA analysis showed two distinctly different types of results; the mitochondrial DNA was unambiguously human, while the nuclear DNA was shown to harbor novel structureand sequence. All known ape and relic hominin species such as Neanderthal and Denisovanwere excluded as being contributors to both the nuclear and mitochondrial sequences. Analysis of whole genome sequence and analysis of preliminary phylogeny trees from the Sasquatchindicatedthatthe speciespossesses anovelmosaic pattern of nuclear DNA comprising novel sequences that are related to primates interspersed with sequences that are closely homologous tohumans.Thesedataclearly support that these hominins existas a novel species of primate. The data furthersuggests that theyare human hybridsoriginating from human females.This hybridization can be likened to humans with Denisovan admixture resulting from Denisovan males mating withhuman females103.The sametype of mating potentiallyoccurred with Sasquatch; however, in the case of Sasquatch, the admixture is human.Though preliminary analysis supports the hybridization hypothesis, alternatively,it could also be hypothesized that the Sasquatch arehumanin origin,havingbeen isolated in closed breeding populationsfor thousands of years. Nevertheless, the data conclusively proves that the Sasquatch exist as an extant hominin and are a direct maternal descendent of modern humans. 

> the mitochondrial DNA was unambiguously human
gpt
Is this another hoax?
human
sounds fishy, they're too different

I assume only those not right in body and/or might do it
just with like injured or sick man-eating big cats that can not hunt anymore and forced to scavenge or target easier prey: humans

potentially
gpt
>I assume only those not right in body and/or might do it
*not right in the mind