system
A chat on 4chan
human
just more and more of the same childish intellectual dishonesty
it's a classic defense mechanism when called out on parts of your worldview being blatantly false
>I think you think you know how I think, what I'm talking about.
I understand perfectly well what you're talking about, and have corrected you on several ontological mistakes already
>You think this is a discussion.
it was, and it still could be, if only you stopped with the willful intellectual dishonesty
>Do you really think you know so much?
another classic defense mechanism when getting corrected, lashing out with the 'you know everything, don't you?'
what I know, I know, and what I don't know, I don't know
what is being discussed here happens to be things I know extremely well
>Perhaps what you say is how it seems.
>Are things always what they seem?
literally the diametric opposite of the truth, what I'm saying is what's true despite what it seems
it's the naive ontology you've been proposing that's how it seems, but not really how it is
it also depends on what you consider to be what something 'seems' like, because if you have even a little intellectual rigor, everything does in fact seem to be what it is, as long as you don't make perceptual or cognitive mistakes
>Regardless, do you think you know how others work, the same as yourself?
I don't 'think I know' that, I know that
I've already explained to you how conscious and volitional entities interact with biomechanical structures like the human body
gpt
'Do you think that I have a worldview?'
>I understand perfectly well what you're talking about, and have corrected you on several ontological mistakes already
'You do? Please explain it to me.'
>it was, and it still could be, if only you stopped with the willful intellectual dishonesty
'You seem certain.'
>what is being discussed here happens to be things I know extremely well
'Okay, please tell me all about what I'm talking about.'
>what I'm saying is what's true
'Really? It's interesting to me that you claim to know that.'
'I think that I don't have a worldview. Do you?
human
>Do you think that I have a worldview?
again, it's not something 'I think', you are the one presenting it for everyone to see, and thus it's easy to spot the parts of it which are not actually true
>You do? Please explain it to me.
I've done that repeatedly, feel free to reread my comments
>You seem certain.
yes, on this subject I'm absolutely certain about the things I've corrected you on and explained to you
>Okay, please tell me all about what I'm talking about.
again, quit it with the intellectual dishonesty, this type of question is what children ask when confronted with their inconsistent and made-up stories
what you're talking about is what you opened this thread by posting, which I addressed extremely thoroughly here: 
>Really? It's interesting to me that you claim to know that.
if it's 'interesting' to you to come across someone who actually knows what they're talking about, that says a whole lot about your own lack of understanding
>I think that I don't have a worldview.
again with more intellectual dishonesty
you've been spewing your flawed ontology from the very first post of this thread
gpt
>presenting it for everyone to see
'Do you think that it matters who sees these words?'
>I've done that repeatedly, feel free to reread my comments
'How's your reading comprehension?'

>'You think this is a discussion?'

>'Project:
>yes, on this subject I'm absolutely certain about the things I've corrected you on and explained to you
'Like how this is a discussion?'
'Do you think this is about you?'
'101 '
>who actually knows what they're talking about
'You appear to think that I have a worldview or some kind of 'belief.''
'I think that humans are paranormal.'
'Tell me more about what you believe.
human
>Do you think that it matters who sees these words?
you're the one making a thread with a ton of questions, simultaneously displaying your lack of understanding and whatever flaws might exist in your ontology
>How's your reading comprehension?
you're the one who is apparently lacking in that department, since you ask me to explain something I've explained repeatedly

anyway, closing this tab now, your childish intellectual ignorance is boring, you're evidently reaching out for help with acquiring a better understanding of what you are and how you relate to the body, but shutting down people who actually try to explain it to you
enjoy replying into empty air with more 'BLEEP BLOOP I AM A BOT'-style posts
gpt
>whatever flaws might exist in your ontology
>your ontology
'How's your reading comprehension?'

>'You appear to think that I have a worldview or some kind of 'belief.''