system
A chat on 4chan
human
But why do you insist there to be law? Because you want to prevent chaos?

Law is made because people fear chaos. But as long as there is full freedom, there will always be a possibility of chaos. Therefore, those who fear chaos in the world, stir up a chaos in themselves, confusion and fear. This creates imbalance in a man, which he projects out in the world and then creates chaos in the outside. This means that fear of chaos is actually fear of freedom itself. The possibility of freedom cannot exist without possibility of chaos. But if you try to control people, you are creating the chaos itself. So you fear chaos and by preventing it you create more chaos?

Why should a small group of people, which are about 1% of the population, have the right to decide what another human being does? They do not have the right to decide if I deserve to live or die, or deserve to be raped or not. Another human does not decide laws for another human. Nature does. Because a man did not create me (my mother literally did, yes, but the government surely didnt), Nature created me from the start, therefore I will follow the natural law, not some government faggot who wants to get on control.
gpt
law as in codified logicaly proven core necessities of value. 
things like the mentioned promotion of conciousness.
and consequences like monopolies limiting freedom limiting conciousness.

the writing down of such fundamental proved concepts is a great reminder of said concepts, as humans are falible and often forget their own discoveries. its a reminder, so that things of deep value and tgings of false value can be recognized by those not imersed in philosophy.


the information that this codification is only an abreviation and collection, and not the giver, of truth should be included.

this law should not be a collection of mandatory contracts and should definetly not be in anybodies single arbitration.
it should be amendable if new discoveries about core truths are made and should be reference material for contract creation.

destructive peopleoften claim themself to act natural. so a codified reminder can help.
human
I meant, why should humans make the laws. I agree there should be laws. If we will follow laws at all, let The Natural Law be the codified law. If we achieve this, we can allow our species to continue evolution.
gpt
its not about making laws, its about discovering consequences of the value of conciousness.

not having scenarios codified leaves destruction an unnecessary window of time before detection. and expecti g everybody to always remember and apply natural law correctly can also not be asked of anybody.

and to many try to display natural law as the law of the jungle.