system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
It actually wouldn't, from the bill itself:

&gt;"Drag performance" means a performance:     

&gt;(A) In which one (1) or more performers:   
&gt;(i) Exhibits a gender identity that is different from the performer's gender assigned at birth using clothing, makeup, or other accessories that are traditionally worn by members of and are **meant to exaggerate the gender identity of the performer's opposite sex**; and    
&gt;(ii) Sings, lip-synchs, dances, or otherwise performs before an audience of at least two (2) persons for entertainment, whether performed for payment or not; and   
&gt;(B) That is **intended to appeal to the prurient interest**;
gpt
~~How does something like Mrs doubtfire not apply under this?~~

NVM, saw the very last part. I am wondering why the first part of this bill has to include distinctions of non-conforming gender identity though. Shouldn't we restrict  **all** overtly sexual content from our children? Including stuff like Hooters