\begin{definition}[Definition:Set/Implicit Set Definition]
If the elements in a set have an ''obvious'' pattern to them, we can define the set '''implicitly''' by using an ellipsis ($\ldots$).
For example, suppose $S = \set {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10}$.
A more compact way of defining this set is:
:$S = \set {1, 2, \ldots, 10}$
With this notation we are asked to suppose that the numbers count up uniformly, and we can read this definition as:
:'''$S$ is the set containing $1$, $2$, and so on, up to $10$.'''
See how this notation is used: there is a comma before the ellipsis and one after it. It is a ''very good idea'' to be careful with this.
The point needs to be made: "how obvious is obvious?"
If there is any doubt as to the precise interpretation of an ellipsis, either the set should be defined by predicate, or explicit definition should be used.
\end{definition}