Slippery slope

Re: “They had no idea,” Letters, Aug. 12.

The writer was correct, the Second Amendment was indeed written when firearms were single-shot muskets. Likewise, the First Amendment was written when free speech was from a stump in the town square and handbills were printed one at a time.

Today we have the internet and the dark web, where hate speech, child pornography and bomb-making instructions are shared instantaneously, virtually worldwide. Is it time to look at limiting the First Amendment as well? It may be a slippery slope when we consider limiting constitutional rights.

Dennis Treadwell, Pipe Creek, Texas

What is the value?

I don’t care for hunting, but I understand there is a purpose for it. I don’t care for alcohol, but I understand many people are able to use it in moderation for enjoyment. I don’t care for sports where people deliberately try to beat each other senseless, but, since it’s voluntary, I understand people choose to do it and/or pay money to watch it.

So, can someone please explain to me the redeeming social value of private citizens owning assault rifles? Can we set up gun ranges where folks can rent one and shoot it for entertainment or the adrenaline rush? Why do we need to allow these weapons of mass destruction to be part of the “freedom” to own weapons?

Susan Hull

Vote Joaquin out

Who cares who donates to the president? Two guys — only the Castro brothers. Why didn’t Rep. Joaquin Castro reveal who donated to President Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton? That goes to show what kind of people these two guys are. I hope next election, the people remember and vote Joaquin out. These guys are bad for our city.

Rick Martinez