Various news articles reporting the deployment of the heat and wind shield over the Insight seismometer describe it as measuring "vibrations that have an amplitude comparable to the size of an atom." or "tremors smaller than a hydrogen atom!" While amazing, this actually sounds pretty coarse by modern standards (compare LIGO which is sensitive to attometer scale distortions of its optical paths for instance). Does anyone actually have figures for the sensitivity?

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ you try fitting LIGO on a lander $\endgroup$ – JCRM Feb 5 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ @JCRM tricky, I grant you, but on the other hand LIGO is roughly a billion times more sensitive to displacements of its mirrors (attometers vs nanometers) than Insight is to displacement of the ground underneath it. $\endgroup$ – Steve Linton Feb 5 at 12:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The question is, is that level of precision necessary, or would an instrument that sensitive just generate enormous amounts of noise you have to filter out? They're trying to detect seismic events, not gravitational waves. $\endgroup$ – Hobbes Feb 5 at 12:39
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ "When powered up on Earth, the SEIS seismometer is immediately disturbed by a level of background noise that makes it impossible to determine its real characteristics with any exactitude" -- contrary to the question it is very sensitive by "modern" seismology standards $\endgroup$ – JCRM Feb 5 at 14:14

Spacelfight 101's InSight Instrument Overview says:




So let's look at:


and say you'd like to look at a range between 1 and 2 Hz. That's a bandwidth of 1 Hz, so the sensitivity would be 10-9 m/s2. Call the frequency $\omega = 2 \pi f = 6.28 \text{Hz}$ and walk backwards from acceleration to velocity to position:

$$acc = \cos(\omega t)$$ $$vel = \frac{1}{\omega} \sin(\omega t)$$ $$pos = -\frac{1}{\omega^2} \cos(\omega t)$$

That puts the sensitivity well below 1 Angstrom (10-10) but these are round numbers, and it also requires that the vibration continue for a while to separate it from noise.

The estimates that the amplitudes are of the size of an atom are well founded, but it will take significant signal processing, calibration, baselining, and characterization to really get there. All of the vibration isolation and environmental isolation systems will have to be in deployed and in good working order.

enter image description here

Source "SEIS Instrument Block Diagram – Image: ISAE/IPGP"

enter image description here

Source "Wind & Thermal Shield – Image: CNES/InSight Project"

You can read more about the requirements for the seismometers in The Noise Model of the SEIS Seismometer of the InSight Mission to Mars As you can see the noise and sensitivity analysis is fairly complicated and must take into account a number of contributions.

enter image description here

These limits are specs, we will have to wait a while to see how well the system is really performing on Mars.

enter image description here

Fig. 7 InSight performance requirements. The dashed lines apply only to the VBB vertical, while the solid lines apply to both horizontal and vertical components. Horizontal requirement envelope is reduced due to the tilt impact of several noise sources. In red, system requirements. In blue and green, instrument related requirements

The InSight accelerometers are made from micro-machined silicon MEMS structures and use similar technology to the MEMS accelerometers in personal electronics and games except they are much larger and highly refined. Since the z-axis (vertical) sustains more parallel force due to gravity than the other two axes, it is fabricated slightly differently, and so the noise specs are treated separately for vertical and horizontal.

From the question How was InSight's vertical seismometer (accelerometer) tested in Earth's stronger gravity?:

below: One of the microseismometer sensors, carved from a single piece of silicon 25mm square. Source

enter image description here


Your Answer

