FW: Contrasts?

Subject: FW: Contrasts?

This is the difference.
There is no "i" in  Team. 


George W. Bush speech after capture of Saddam:

Barack Obama speech after killing of bin Laden:


Zeno said...

Of course, it doesn't matter that Osama was a legitimate target while Saddam was not a player in 9/11 and had no actual WMDs to fret over. What matters is that Bush didn't use the first-person singular as much.


Anonymous said...

Not to mention the fact that if the mission had gone sideways, I'm sure every one of the Right WingNuts would have been more than forgiving, and blamed the debacle on the 'armed forces', leaving Obama out of the blame game.

Get over it fuckers...Obama got him.

Anonymous said...


Thx 4 Fish said...

A good example of why it is pointless to discuss politics with anyone from 'Team Bush'. Lots of flag waving and cheering, and nothing but silly nonsense like who uses the personal pronoun least wins (something like a golf score?)

CharlieE said...

Bush speaks about the capture of a president of a sovereign state which we invaded by choice, leaving thousands of Americans and innocent Iraqis dead.

Obama speaks about the killing of a man who was personally tied to the deaths of thousands of Americans.

Contrast, indeed.

ferschitz said...

Yeah, rightwingnuts absolutely DESTEST it that the dreaded black Obama actually got Osama bin Laden (well, or at least that's the story), whilst their hero, GW Bush, did not.

I could go on, but I won't. Suffice it to say that it's quite spurious to compare personal pronouns in how these 2 Pres. gave speeches, as if it, you know, *proves* something.

Let us not forget GW Bush in his codpiece with the giant "Mission Accomplished" sign on the aircraft carrier, lessee... WHEN was that?? Oh yeah: May 1 *2003.* And here we are in Sept of *2011*... and tell me now: how "accomplished" has that "mission" been???

Pffft! Blowhards. Got nothin'. Sore losers.

gruaud said...

Just pathetic.

Creative Commons License