Skip to main content

tv   The Last Word With Lawrence O Donnell  MSNBC  March 15, 2019 7:00pm-8:00pm PDT

7:00 pm
entities got document requests from the judiciary committees a couple of weeks ago. they are all, all 81 of them, facing the same deadline this monday for getting those records up to capitol hill. judiciary chairman gerald nadler is asking these 81 people and entities for information about a gazillion different scandals and issues, everything from the president's hush money payments to the trump tower meeting with the russians to details about the inaugural committee. it's a ton of stuff. some people who were targeted with these document requests have apparently said they're not going to comply, but nadler's office tells us they actually think they're getting a good response so far. they say they've also been working with people who might need a little bit more time, if not potentially a friendly subpoena. but, again, deadline for all of them is on monday. we shall see as of monday what they get. have a good weekend. that does it for us now. we will see you again monday night. now it's time for "the last word" with ali velshi sitting in for lawrence tonight.
7:01 pm
>> i'm alley velshi in for lawrence o'donnell. the president is condemning the horrific terrorist attack in new zealand, where a white supremacist killed 49 people in an attack targeting muslims. the killings are sparking a worldwide discussion about islamophobia, but they have also brought attention to the words of our president. political scientist brian class writes in "the washington post" that, quote, trump is an islamophobic bigot. brian will join us to talk about his piece later and the hour and we'll have a live report from the southern border from nbc's cal perry who is going to give us the facts about a situation that donald trump often seems to misrepresent. but first, a day after the president's own party revolted and voted to end his national emergency declaration at the southern border, donald trump did something he's never done before. he issued his first ever presidential veto today in order to block that congressional resolution. the president was forced into that position because 12 republican senators, these 12,
7:02 pm
voted with democrats to send that resolution to the president's desk. in an oval office photo-op to issue his veto, donald trump said this about that bipartisan resolution -- >> yes congress passed a dangerous resolution that if signed into law would put countless americans in danger. very grave danger. it is definitely a national emergency. rarely have we had such a national emergency. therefore, to defend the safety and security of all americans, i will be signing and issuing a formal veto of this reckless resolution, and that's what it was. congress has the freedom to pass this resolution, and i have the duty to veto it. and i'm very proud to veto it. >> i'm very proud to veto it. donald trump also said he'd be proud of this -- >> if we don't get what we want one way or the other, whether it's through you, through the
7:03 pm
military, through anything you want to call, i will shut down the government. >> fair enough. we disagree. >> i tell you what, i am proud to shut down the government for border security, chuck. >> president trump's government shutdown and president trump's veto have something important in common. donald trump didn't have to do either of them. donald trump didn't have to shut down the government because he was actually offered a better deal for his wall before he shut down the government than the one he got after his shutdown. and koiaccording to politico, donald trump didn't have to suffer the rebuke by republicans that led to his first veto. eliana johnson and burgess everett report it didn't have to be that way. republicans say especially in trump had engaged more consistently with senators and made a relatively modest agreement to change the national emergencies act to rein in presidential power. one republican senator who voted against the president gave this quote to politico. "trump quite possibly could have gotten 50 senators voting no," said republican senator mike
7:04 pm
lee, who led the failed effort to get trump to agree to changes to the national emergencies act. here's how politico describes the self-proclaimed dealmaker donald trump's efforts to sway republican senators. quote, trump made little effort to whip wavering gop senators during a hearing wednesday afternoon on trade and said they could vote however they pleased. by wednesday evening, however, he had grown disturbed by the brewing condemnation from his own party. on thursday morning, white house aides began blasting a trump tweet to gop senators by text message to remind them of how the president viewed the impending vote. quote, a vote for today's resolution by republican senators is a vote for nancy pelosi, crime and the open border democrats. donald trump now claims that he didn't care if republicans voted against him on the national emergency. >> i put no pressure on anybody. i actually said i could have gotten some of them to come along. i want you to vote your heart.
7:05 pm
do what you want to do. i'll let them know when there's pressure. i told them that. i didn't need the vote. we all knew it was going to be a veto and they're not going to be able to override. >> congress will have a vote on overriding donald trump's veto. speaker pelosi said, on march 26th the house will once again act to protect our constitution and our democracy from the president's emergency declaration by holding a vote to override his veto. in his statement on his veto, donald trump also gave a greatest hits compilation of his claims about the southern border, attempting to portray an emergency where even members of his own party have said with their votes that there is no emergency. >> we're on track for a million illegal aliens to rush our borders. people hate the word invasion, but that's what it is, it's an invasion of drugs and criminals and people. we have no idea who they are, but we capture them because border security is so good, but they're put in a very bad
7:06 pm
position and we're bursting at the seams. literally bursting at the seams. in many cases they're stone cold criminals, and in many cases and in some cases you have killers coming in and murderers coming in. our immigration system is stretched beyond the breaking point. >> all right. joining us now to discuss all after this, david corn, washington bureau chief for mother joins. joyce vance, former u.s. attorney for the northern district of alabama, and a professor at the university of alabama school of law. and yamiche alcindor, the white house correspondent for the pooe"pbs newshour." all three are msnbc correspondents. thank you for joining me on this friday night. yamiche, let's start with you. what happened today was what was expected. the house will get this resolution now. they will hold a vote on march 26th. it will pass the house. it won't probably pass the senate. what is the net effect of this presidential veto? >> the net effect is that the president can say and put in a
7:07 pm
commercial that he defied even establishment republicans and fought for what he sees as a national emergency on the border, and as a result he can -- he can show that -- and argue that he alone was fighting for the american people. of course there is also this net effect, which is that the president has now gotten a message from at least 12 republican senators that, yes, we will back you on some issues of border security, but we're not scared enough to vote with you for every single thing. and when you have senators, republican senators using words like dangerous, using words like king and reckless, this could be a growing problem for the president if he doesn't get really his messaging and his communication with republican senators in. i think it was striking when he was talking from the oval office today and president trump said he didn't put any pressure on republican senators. we know that that's definitely just not true. he's absolutely lying when he says that because we know that the white house and the president were scrambling to get republicans not to vote for this. that's why you saw senator
7:08 pm
tillis of north carolina flip his vote at the last minute. >> yes. joyce, to yamiche's point about republican senators saying to the president we won't support you on every single thing, this isn't a break on border security or even on the wall as much as it is conservative senators, some of them with a libertarian streak, many of whom are not up for election in the next cycle, being able to say this is executive authority gone too far. we don't actually want you declaring a national emergency on something we don't actually share your view as a national emergency because you or someone else can use that power in an unwieldy way going forward. >> i think that's absolutely right. and this is not a vote about policy. this is really a vote about the constitution. and the separation of powers. and the republicans who joined with democrats in the senate were reacting to the fact that the president was trying to control the power of the purse.
7:09 pm
obviously that spending power is reserved to conversation in article i of the constitution. so if it they were willing to give it to the president here, there is no telling where he could have taken that down the road, but i think yamiche is right, you know, everybody knows that the votes aren't really there to overturn the veto and where this ultimately will be decided is in the court system, where i think the president will get a little bit of a lesson on how the constitution works. >> and, david, i want to read you something from "the new york times" where it says "the mere act of defying mr. trump, speaking of senators, foreshadows potential new difficulty for the president as he seeks to push his agenda through a democratic-controlled house and a less plient republican-controlled senate." the larger issue, it's not so important that the president vetoed the bill. lots of presidents gets bills they veto. the issue here is is this a less compliant senate? we know it's a less compliant house because it's controlled by the other party. >> yeah, i think marginally, i
7:10 pm
at this stage am not ready to lead a parade down pennsylvania avenue to capitol hill to celebrate the republicans who broke with the president on an issue of executive privilege and trying to maintain some congressional power over this. i mean, we've seen for two years they just kowtow, they roll over for him, and until they get out there and start really saying that the language he's using, calling this an invasion on the same day that a madman shoots up -- kills 49 muslim people in new zealand because of the invasion there. when they really start digging in on the issues, on the demagoguery and the hatred that he inspires and as yamiche said, you know, the lies that he puts out, then i'll say that there is maybe a turning point. this might be a one off. i'm not, you know, we'll have to see whether they're going to create any opposition to the
7:11 pm
themes that trump is putting out that i think are tearing the country apart. >> or even, joyce, if it's not the themes, it could be the one theme that americans are most concerned about, and that is the investigations, whatever comes out of the mueller investigation, because as we know, the difference between now and watergate is that at some point president nixon lost populari popularity -- against republicans and they decided to take action. that is not necessarily what we're watching right now. >> it's not at all what we're watching here. there are a lot of different schools of thought about why that might be. it could be this pervasive ability of the president to direct speak to the population through twitter. that's not clear. but one wonders if at some point there won't be something that is a bridge too far, whether that's something that will come out of the mueller report or at another point in time. hasn't turned that corner yet. >> yamiche, let's talk about that.
7:12 pm
does the president -- is the president at all worried about what happened today? is he worried about the fact that he had to veto a bill because it did get past the senate? he knew right after the midterm elections that there were going to be all sorts of things coming from the house, including investigations, but he probably thought he had a bit of a bulwark in the senate. >> i think it is worrisome, and that's why you saw the president and white house aides pressuring republican senators because they understand that there are limits to even republican senators saying, look, we can't back you for every single thing because it's going to make us also set a precedent that we think democrats might use in the case of the national emergency. i also think that there is something going on here, if i could ask something -- >> yeah. >> or answer something differently. which is the context in which this is happening. all day i was asking the white house, was there any thought given to cancelling this event or rescheduling it because of what happened in new zealand? i heard there were talks about wrestling with it, thinking maybe we should do this. ultimately the president not only vetoed and held this event
7:13 pm
with people basically criminalizing immigrants, but he also said while he was being questioned, someone said, well, what do you think of the rise of white nationalism. he said, well, actually, i don't think it's that big of a deal. i think it's a small group of strong people. that's simply not true. we know the numbers that white extremism and white nationalism are on the rise. the person who carried out the new zealand attack in his manifesto talked about the fact that he saw president trump as a symbol for renewed white identity. now, i'm not saying that president trump obviously inspired this person to go kill people, to make that clear, but there is something going on there in the white house. you know what? we're going to hold our event because we just want to do this because we think it's good for our popularity. >> i suppose, joyce, you can't go around denying everything everybody says about you, but that's a strong accusation, right? this man who committed these atrocities, these acts of terror in new zealand mentioned the president of the united states. he prepared a -- weird questionnaire, a question and answer as if a reporter was
7:14 pm
interviewing him and posted it, and he did speak of this representation of white nationalism. the president never takes an opportunity to distance himself from that sort of thing. >> and that's really reprehensible because i think you're right, you know, we are not responsible for other people's actions, but to not take the opportunity to say as president this is not what i stand for, hate is wrong, violence is wrong, i think makes this very distasteful and almost acts as though the president in some way is willing to lend a little bit of credibility. look, this notion that white supremacy and that, you know, i guess the new zealand equivalent of the domestic terrorism that we experience in this country, the notion that that is not on the rise is something that the data doesn't support. >> yes. >> and in many parts of our country, the worst terrorism that people have experienced, like in birmingham, alabama where i live is dom
7:15 pm
terrorism, a ku klux klan bombing a church that killed four young girls or a right-wing terrorist's bomb that kills a police officer at a women's clinic. that's a much more real experience in america and something we should be stacking up our resources against. >> david? >> i don't think we should mince words. the president had an opportunity to distance himself or to not have that event. he chose not to do so. and you have to wonder what he's thinking. he's thinking that he doesn't want to. he doesn't want to distance himself from this. he doesn't want to say that extreme white nationalistic terror is a threat. he doesn't want to say those things. and why? he's been, you know, you're going to get to this later in the show, but on the campaign and ever since he's been saying things like islam hates us. one campaign event some guy said we got to get rid of all the muslims. he said, you know, we're thinking about what we're going to do. not only does he not distance himself, he does encourage this. words matter. >> yeah. >> words can inspire people.
7:16 pm
they can cause fear. and he wants to be doing that. i don't think there is any other explanation. >> we'll be talking a lot about this this evening. thank you to all three of you. yamiche alcindor, joyce vance and david corn. coming uh up, the alleged new zealand shooter called immigrants invaders and as you heard, president trump in the oval office did the same things. in a new op-ed, brian class argues it is the president's own reckless and dangerous language that is adding fuel to a growing nationalist movement. just hours after the massacre are getting attention around the world. the scariest thing he finds in the aftermath of the shooting will surprise you. and later, the president's treasury secretary vows to fight efforts for congress to get the president's tax returns, but did questions in the michael cohen hearings actually help democrats in their quest to investigate the president's finances? i can't tell you who i am or what i witnessed, but i can tell you liberty mutual customized my car insurance so i only pay for what i need. oh no, no, no, no, no, no, no...
7:17 pm
7:18 pm
7:19 pm
new zealand police say a 28-year-old australian white nationalist has been arrested in the attacks that killed 49 people, including children at two mosques in the city of christchurch, new zealand. the alleged killer left behind a manifesto which detailed his hatred of muslims and immigrants. today australian newscaster who is also a politics professor and the child of muslim immigrants to australia made this powerful statement about the massacre and the political rhetoric. listen.
7:20 pm
>> i've gutted and i'm scared and i feel overcome with utter hopelessness. the most dishonest thing, the most dishonest thing would be to say that i'm shocked. i'm simply not. there is nothing about what happened in christchurch today that shocks me. i went to the mosque today, i do that every friday, just like the people at the mosques in christchurch today. i know exactly what those moments before the shooting began would have been like. i know how quiet, how still, how introspective those people would have been before they were suddenly gunned down. how separated from the world they were feeling until the world came in and tore their lives apart. and i know that the people who did this knew well enough how profoundly defenseless their victims were in that moment. this is a congregational prayer that happens every week like clock work. this was slaughter by appointment. it's scary because like millions
7:21 pm
of other muslims, i'm going to keep attending those appointments, and it feels like fish in a barrel, but that isn't the scariest thing. the thing that scared me most was when i started reading the manifesto that one of the apparent perpetrators of this attack published, not because it was deranged, but because it was so familiar. let me share some quotes with you to show you what i mean. the truth is that islam is not like any other faith. it is the religious equivalent of fascism. or the real cause of bloodshed is the immigration program which allowed muslim fanatics to migrant in the first place. how do those words sound now? how do they sound when i tell you they weren't part of the manifesto. they were push established today after this terrorist attack on an australian parliamentary letterhead. i'm going to say the same thing i said about four years ago after a horrific islamist attack. now, now we come together. now we understand this is not a game.
7:22 pm
terrorism doesn't choose its victims selectively. we are one community, and that everything we say to try to tear people apart, demonize particular groups, set them against each other, that all has consequences, even if we're not the ones with our fingers on the trigger. >> today president trump condemned the attacks as evil. >> i spoke with prime minister ardern of new zealand to express the sorrow of our entire nation following the monstrous terror attacks at two mosques. these sacred places of worship were turned into scenes of evil killing. >> but in the same remarks made as he vetoed congress' rebuke of his national emergency declaration to build his border wall, president trump said this about people at the southern border. >> we're on track for a million illegal aliens to rush our borders. people hate the word invasion, but that's what it is, it's an
7:23 pm
invasion of drugs and criminals and people. >> president trump used the word invasion today to describe the situation at the border. he's done that before. but he did it today, despite the fact that the alleged killer in new zealand wrote in his manifesto that he wanted to fend off invaders and that there was nowhere free from mass immigration. and despite the fact that the alleged killer of 11 people at a synagogue in pittsburgh last year also wrote that he was motivated by immigrant invaders. we played you the president's words calling this attack on muslims evil, but we should also remember what else donald trump has said about muslims. >> donald j. trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of muslims entering the united states until our country's representatives can figure out what the hell is going on. >> hey, i watched when the world
7:24 pm
trade center came tumbling down, and i watched in jersey city, new jersey, where thousands and thousands of people were cheering as that building was come down. thousands of people were cheering. >> you know, the police say that didn't happen at all. those rumors have been on the internet for some time. >> it did happen. i saw it. it was on television. >> you saw it with your own eyes? >> george, it did happen. there were people that were cheering on the other side of new jersey where you have large arab populations. >> the president was lying. brian class examines all of this in "the washington post" op-ed today. a short history of president trump's anti-muslim bigotry. brian, thank you for joining us. it's a meaningful piece that you've written and you're saying things that you think people need to understand, and that is that the mood is set as we discussed in the segment before this, the president did not take any opportunity today to distance himself from a killer,
7:25 pm
a terrorist, a person who took 49 lives of people who were worshipping. he didn't take any opportunity to say that he wouldn't be inspiring people like that. and david corn was saying that he didn't do it deliberately because he doesn't mind. >> well, i think that's absolutely right and i think it's actually worse than that because he has a long track record of stoking the kind of hatred that provides the rhetorical or intellectual ammunition for attacks like we saw in new zealand today. and, you know, i think what you have to understand here is that president trump is fundamentally an islamophobic bigot. he is somebody who has mainstream hatred against muslims and he's done this for years. in 2011, in 2012, he insinuated that president obama was some sort of secret muslim and that was a problem. more recently during the campaign, in addition to the fact that he said we should track muslims with a database, he also talked about the idea of banning all muslims from entering the united states, an entire religion. the most un-american thing you
7:26 pm
can imagine, to target people based on their faith, and then since becoming president he hasn't stopped. i mean, not only the invasion terms, but something that was a big deal over here in london was in november of 2017, trump retweeted three times one of the leaders of britain first, which is a neo-fascist movement who has been personally convicted of hate crimes against muslims and who organized what she called mosque patrols -- sorry, christian patrols and mosque invasions, trying to intimidate muslims. and that is who the donald trump decided to give a platform to and to spread hate to his millions of twitter followers. so what we have here is that trump is a central figure in an ecosystem of hatred that is inspiring attacks around the world and that's something we need to be honest about. >> something that's worth pointing out is that if someone wielded those accusations against you, you'd say something about it. you're entirely not true. i don't want to be associated with these people. but on several occasions, including associations with
7:27 pm
david duke and the ku klux klan, including what you mentioned where someone talked to him during the election about what we're going to do with muslims. remember when john mccain was told that barack obama was a muslim and a bad man? he took the moment to be who john mccain was. donald trump doesn't do this. he doesn't distance himself from what you're talking about. >> that's right. so in that clip where we saw before where trump is basically encouraging his supporters with this question -- he has this question where they say, you know, what are we going to do about all these muslims and trump is nodding along saying, that's right, we need this question. a few questions after that, there was a question about climate change and donald trump shut it down. so he can shut things down when he believes that they're wrong, but he doesn't do that with anti-muslim bigotry. in fact, he stokes it. and beyond that, if somebody had accused me of these things, there wouldn't be a long track record of my statements where the shoe sort of fits, right? that's the problem here. if the manifesto had named other
7:28 pm
politicians, there wouldn't be dozens and dozens and dozens of statements where that figure had made anti-muslim bigoted statements. and so i think at the end of the day if we want to stop this sort of bigotry and hate in our societies, we have to stop electing hateful bigots and that is what donald trump has become, and what he continues to act like in the white house, unfortunately. >> your article, which i hope everybody reads, is -- really does speak of a growing problem. donald trump was asked today about white nationalists. here's what he said. >> do you see today white nationalism as a rising threat around the world? >> i don't really. i think it's a small group of people who have very, very serious problems. i guess if you look at what happened in new zealand, perhaps that's a case. i don't know enough about it yet. they're just learning about the person. and the people involved. but it's certainly a terrible thing. terrible thing. >> the stats are not with the president, whether it's in the
7:29 pm
united states or around the world. we know that rising anti-semitism around the world is a fact. we know that rising anti-immigrant sentiment is a fact. we know that rising islamophobia is a fact and we know that nationalism and nativism movements are a fact. >> that's absolutely right. the data shows that the president is wrong. it's a growing threat. it's a major threat and it's a violent threat. and i think that, you know, beyond that, it's the different way that trump responds to violence is conditioned on who commits it and who is the victim because, you know, after charlottesville, he praised those people marching with neo nazis and the kkk as very fine people. here he's not distancing himself from white nationalism and minimizing the threat. whereas conversely when there was a terrorist attack by islamic radicals in the united kingdom in 2017, i found out about that attack because my phone buzzed with a notification that trump had tweeted, using that attack to sort of give ammunition to his travel ban against muslims.
7:30 pm
so he acted immediately when it's an islamist terrorist, but when it's a white terrorist, he doesn't say the kinds of things that he would say normally. and beyond that, you know, it's one of these things where people accuse you of politicizing tragedy when you talk about this with president trump's words, but our politics is part of the tragedy, our politics is encouraging these tragedies. so we have to be outcome spoken about them and hold anti-muslim bigots the way we would hold accountable other bigots. >> brian, thank you so much for what you've written. brian klaas, as assistant professor of global politics at university of london. "washington post" columnist. coming up, president trump's own treasury secretary has made it clear he's not going to cooperate with members of congress who want to get the president's tax returns, but a member of congress whose questioning during the michael cohen hearings may have given democrats another legal argument to get the president's taxes. he'll be my next guest. estion a? you won't find relief here. go to the pharmacy counter for powerful claritin-d.
7:31 pm
7:32 pm
7:33 pm
7:34 pm
house speaker nancy pelosi came under fire this week from members of her own party when she came out against impeaching president trump, focussing instead on the ongoing investigations by several house committees, but her strategy did earn her applapluadits from one unlikely source, steve bannon. >> has the president met his match in nancy pelosi. how would you grade pelosi in the last couple of months? >> a 10. a 10 out of 10. she's a war horse, and i think she's done, from what she's trying to accomplish, i think pelosi's done a good job.
7:35 pm
i think the investigations the next five or six months are going to be close to insanity. i think every day they're going to be pounding the president, poundth with subpoenas, pounding with information requests. the house is just going to be a bear pit. >> the house is just going to be a bear pit. yesterday, treasury secretary steve mnuchin found himself in that bear pit and was asked about whether or not he would comply with a request from the house ways and means committee for president trump's tax returns. something the committee has the legal authority to demand. here's what mnuchin said. >> we will protect the president as we would protect any individual taxpayer under their rights. >> we would protect the president as we would protect any individual taxpayer. translation, he's probably not going to try and protect the president from having his -- he's going to try to protect the president from having his tax returns released. now, the president has consistently refused to release his tax returns since the 2016 campaign, claiming he can't release them because he's being
7:36 pm
audited by the irs. >> i'm being audited now. >> a minor audit. >> it's und routine audit. >> like, retune. >> but as soon as my routine audit is finished, i'll release my returned. i'd be very proud to. >> we're three years away from that routine audit. just that justification has come under considerable scrutiny when michael cohen appeared before the house oversight committee and said this. >> he had said to me was that what he didn't want was to have an entire group of think tanks that are tax experts run through his tax return and start ripping it to pieces and then he'll end up in an audit and he'll ultimately have taxable consequences, penalties and so on. >> so that's an interesting point, that basically said he didn't want to release his tax returns because he might end up in an audit. so could you presume from that statement that he wasn't under
7:37 pm
audit? >> i presume that he's not under audit. >> it's the president's guy, the president's personal lawyer presumed that he wasn't under audit and that he was simply not returning -- disclosing his tax returns so that he wouldn't be audited. that congressman you saw there asking that question, freshman congressman jimmy gomez. he's the only member of congress who sits on both the house oversight committee and the ways and means committee, which can demand trump's tax returns. he joins me next. let's see, aleve is proven better on pain than tylenol extra strength. and last longer with fewer pills.
7:38 pm
so why am i still thinking about this? i'll take aleve. aleve. proven better on pain. since i'm a truck driver, sometimes i'm gone for, like, three weeks at a time. even if i'm 3,000 miles away, i'm connected with my boys. just pull on over, see my son's game, and i'm having a ball. (vo) there when it matters. buy the new galaxy s10 and get a galaxy s10e on us.
7:39 pm
if your moderate to severeor crohn's symptoms are holding you back,
7:40 pm
7:41 pm
i have not discussed with anybody in the white house the issue of his tax returns or a request of his tax return. >> his attorneys? >> i've had no discussions with his attorneys, but, again, i'm not continuing to go down this -- again of you asking me 20 questions on this. >> that's what we do here, we ask questions. i always ask questions instead of -- >> actually, all due respect, i take that back. you can ask the questions and i will try to answer them, but i think what -- >> thank you, i appreciate that. >> wow, i'm not going down this thing we're you're going to keep asking me questions. that's the congress of the united states, mr. secretary. jimmy gomez questioning treasure secretary steven mnuchin and explaining to him how congressional hearings work. joining me now, congressman gomez, a democrat, freshman democrat from california. he's a member of the house ways and means committee as well as the oversight committee. congressman, i credit you that
7:42 pm
you're new at this, but you knew actually what congress' job is and had the school the treasury secretary of the united states who has been on the job, by the way, for two years. >> thanks for having me. first, i want to send my condolences to the people of new zealand for the tragedy today. >> thank you, sir. >> yes, this administration doesn't want to answer any questions. we had a hearing on the same day with wilbur ross and steve mnuchin and neither one of them want to answer questions. they want to dodge and make sure they never answer anything that puts them or the president add jeopardy. we're going to push them. that is our job. >> that is your job. >> that's the responsibility of congress. >> that's what you're elected to do, sir. let's go back to the conversation you had with michael cohen. it was kind of remarkable. michael cohen was at the time, his lawyer, his personal lawyer, his self-described fixer, a guy who by all accounts seemed to know a whole lot about the president of the united states, saying that the president didn't want tax experts fishing through this tax returns. this is an important issue
7:43 pm
because the president has said prior to becoming president and since becoming president that he is under audit. >> yeah, no, it's a huge issue. you know, what we discovered is that he basically was misleading the people since he started running for the presidency. and why is that? that's the question. we believe that it has to do with his finances. we believe it has to do with who he's in bed with. we believe that it has to do with how is he making decisions as he's currently in the white house. so with cohen answering basically that he's not under audit, it really helped set up the stage and lay part of the foundation for our request for his tax returns. >> quinnipiac asked people a couple of questions about the president's tax returns just last week roughly, and the first question was, "should donald trump release his tax returns?" 64% of respondents said yes, 29% said no. which fits. donald trump doesn't get below 29% on anything.
7:44 pm
if trump refuses to release his tax returns, do you think congress should investigate? again, 57% said yes, 38% said no. talk to me, congressman, about what happens next. when you said what michael cohen to you sets up what you might do next. how does that play out? >> so, first, i think that we want to continue to lay the foundation on our argument. you know, we do have the right as the house ways and means committee to request his returns, but we still need to provide justification. i would love to see allen weissleberg, his finance guy, come before the house oversight committee and answer questions about what he knows about president trump's finances, some of his dealings, you know, the payments to michael cohen regarding stormy daniels. the inflating of his property values and deflating of his property values. did he cheat on his tax returns? we want to really get to the bottom of that to start setting up even more and providing the justification we need in order to ask for those returns.
7:45 pm
>> how do you -- how do you keep this all straight? because you're on oversight. you're on ways and means. the southern district of new york is investigating some things. the manhattan d.a. is now dealing with this inflating and, you know, they're dealing with -- with paul manafort, but, you know, it almost sounds like it's a warning shot to say, hey, if you're fiddling with real estate and mortgages and things like that, we're going to come after you, to the president. how do you keep track of who is supposed to do what? >> well, we work as a team, right? it's not just one committee. ways and means with richie neal, the chairman, oversight with elijah cummings and we also have the judiciary committee. everybody is working as a team and providing and sharing information and that's what makes this -- our ability to investigate this president, this administration, hold them accountable powerful because we're really working together. i just happen to be on two committees. that gives me a lot of information and understanding of what we need to do to make sure we hold this president accountable. >> i have to say, i'm not shocked by a lot today -- these
7:46 pm
days, but when the treasury secretary said he's not going to take your ways, that was a new one for me. congressman, good to talk to you. thank you for joining us. >> nice talking to you as well. all right. coming up, president trump described america's border with mexico in war like language, where armies of criminals and gang members are launching an investigation, but nbc's cal perry is at the u.s. minnesota border. he's spent a lot of time there. he's going to tell us about the reality. it's very different. that's ahead. reality. it's very different. that's ahead strange forces at work? only if you're referring to gravity-and we covered it. talk to farmers. we know a thing or two because we've seen a thing or two. ♪ we are farmers. bum-pa-dum, bum-bum-bum-bum ♪
7:47 pm
welcome to fowler, indiana. one of the windiest places in america. and home to three bp wind farms. in the off-chance the wind ever stops blowing here... the lights can keep on shining. thanks to our natural gas. a smart partner to renewable energy. it's always ready when needed. or... not. at bp, we see possibilities everywhere. to help the world keep advancing. and back pain made it hard to sleep and get up on time.
7:48 pm
then i found aleve pm. the only one to combine a safe sleep aid, plus the 12 hour pain relieving strength of aleve. i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. when your flight gets in late, it's never too early for coffee. oh no no no. your new boss seems cool, but she might not be sweatpants cool. who is that ready this early? it's only 7 am. somebody help me. close call. not quite ready to face the day? that's why we're here with free hot breakfast and a warm welcome. book at for our price match guarantee. hampton by hilton.
7:49 pm
7:50 pm
it's beyond the shadow of a doubt to me that if there was not collusion, there was at least the effort to collude with a foreign power. beyond the shadow of a doubt that if there was not obstruction of justice, there certainly justice, there was the effort to obstruct justice. whether that's firing james comey, the principal investigator into what happened in the 2016 election or in the light of day tweeting to your attorney general as president trump did the end the russia investigation. >> presidential candidate beto o'rourke saying he does believe the president did try to inspire and president trump has tried to obstruct justice. what does he think should be done about it? >> how congress chooses to address those sets of facts and the findings which i believe we are soon to sfree tee from the r report is up to them. i think the american people will have chance to decide there at the ballot box in november 2020
7:51 pm
and perhaps that's the best way for us to resolve these outstanding questions. >> you have a chance this weekend to find out more about president trump and russia and the latest candidate to enter the democratic candidate primary. sunday night, 9:00 p.m. eastern, msnbc presents headliners. you can watch russia, are you listening. a profile of president trump's questionable relationship with vladmir putin sunday night at 10:00 p.m. eastern hosted by me. today president trump was focused on the border and described the crisis as if it was a war zone without ever mentioning the crisis that his own policy ies have created. we'll see what the trump policies are doing to people at a part of the border that already has a barrier. that's next. er that already has a barrier. that's next. oh...i needed this. no, i can't believe how easy it was to save hundreds of dollars on our car insurance with geico.
7:52 pm
we could have been doing this a long time ago. so, you guys staying at the hotel? yeah, we just got married. oh ho-ho! congratulations! thank you. yeah, i'm afraid of commitment... and being boiled alive. oh, shoot. believe it. geico could save you 15% or more on car insurance. that guy's the worst. the way you triumph over adversity. and live your lives. that's why we redesigned humira. we wanted to make the experience better for you. now there's less pain immediately following injection. we've reduced the size of the needle and removed the citrate buffers. and it has the same effectiveness you know and trust. humira citrate-free is here. a little change can make a big difference. humira can lower your ability to fight infections. serious and sometimes fatal infections, including tuberculosis, and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened, as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions,
7:53 pm
and new or worsening heart failure. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ask your doctor about humira citrate-free. here's to you. in my ethnicity i that i never wouldthings have imagined. ancestrydna was able to tell me where my father's family came from in columbia. it's just been a reconnection to my roots. 20 million members have connected to a deeper family story.
7:54 pm
7:55 pm
el paso, texas is a city hu has become a crisis. the white house is doing little to help leaving local organizations and now taxpayers to shoulder the cost of caring for thiese migrants. cal visited a church that opened its doors to take in asylum seekers from other crowded shelters. good evening. >> reporter: good evening.
7:56 pm
we're here inside where you can see behind me doe flagnations a piling up. 25,000 families came across in just the first four months of fiscal year 2018 and many of them were left on the side of the road by the federal government after they were released by custody with no food, with no water. dropped at bus stations with ankle bracelets and so the local community has stepped up. the donations behind me keep coming because so too do the families. the city of el paso is trying to bend but not break under the weight of tens of thousands of migrants families. another day means more migrants fresh from government custody. there's little coordination between these volunteer efforts and the government. that lack has forced el paso county to approve 20,000 tax dollars on a full-time migrant
7:57 pm
coordinator. >> they have stopped that. the federal government isn't concerned with what happens to the migrants after being processed and leaving them in the streets of el paso or expecting the non-profits to pick up. you'll see a wall that's in most parts of our county but we're still receiving a record number of migrants. >> reporter: the county is now waiting on the city and local non-profit organizations to add funding for what they hope will be a short term solution. it's also forced community groups and pastors to step up where the government has failed. >> we weren't here they would probably be released on the streets. >> why isn't the government handlie ining this. >> i don't know. >> this is what she came with. no shoe laces. these. we gave her these. you see her face. look at her face. >> reporter: monica is the social services provider and the
7:58 pm
center's caretaker for asylum seekers ta ahat are dropped off here. >> we want to make them welcome. this is place they can be safe. >> reporter: this shelter opened two weeks ago to help the other overwhelmed non-profit organizations that care for migrants. >> places that normally shelter them and do this or have been doing this for years or month, their facilities are too full. there's no place for them to go. there's too many of them. there's a state of crisis. >> reporter: inside the shelter it's about getting people what they need but it's also about a return to normalcy. >> his son is not wearing any shoes right now because the shoes got stuck in the mud crossing the river to get over to the immigration to turn himself in and the child has been five days with no shoes. we're going to get limb some shoes right away. >> reporter: migrants are gratefgrate ful after a dangerous injury
7:59 pm
knee. >> he says he suffered a lot coming here. once he got to many place he felt overwhelmed with joy. >> reporter: volunteers work quickly to help transport migrants to their next destination before the next bus load arrives. >> other than giving them food, water and shelter, the most important thing is to get them to the point of contact. we can't house them here more than three or four days. we don't have the resources. we don't have the money. if we keep a lot of people here, we're not able to help the next group. >> reporter: the issue of immigration is being used to divide america and around the world politicians use fear and fear of other people as way to divide. we saw how that fear can turn to violence yesterday in new zealand. el paso remains a beacon of hope and unity. people sorting through medical equipment. unified in way of helping people who come here to find a better life. i would submit to you in way that only texas can, this old abandoned furniture warehouse
8:00 pm
and people behind me represent the best of what america can be. >> thank you for that. thank you for your great reporting this whole time along the border and on this story. it's an important one. the 11th hour with brian williams starts now. donald trump proudly issues his first ve veto of his campaign promise. he doubles down on immigration and the wall but did it get harder on limb to ghim to get w wants. we learned rick gates is still cooperating on several investigations. the mueller team has delayed his sentencing for a fifth time. the president's excellent o -- comments on white nationalism. the 11th hour on a friday night starts now.


info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on