


Trump Marks the End of a Cycle



Roberto Savio

Roberto Savio























The disasters created by three centuries of geed as the main value of the “new economy” were becoming evident through figures showing an unprecedented concentration of wealth in a few hands, with many victims – especially among the younger generation.









We are now facing a series of real questions.





Republish | | Print |

Related Tags

  • ProsperityForRI

    Food for thought.

  • Jahar Saddles

    The USA has never been anything but an Oligarchy. Indeed when those founders who are so often referred to wrote those famous words their descendants quote often; “We hold the truths to be self evident that all men are created equal” they were not referring to my own ancestors the Native Americans whom they were practicing genocide and total war against, even to the extent of “germ warfare”, and they are illegally in possession of more than 60% of their geographic territory as a result of violating their own constitution’s Art 6, “All Treaties are Supreme Law”. Nor were they referring to their slaves whom they made vast fortunes from not only the labor but also from the slave trade itself. They were not referring to the children they produced with their slaves whom they most often sold as slaves. They were not referring to the indentured servants they often “sponsored” who if they were unable to repay their patron could be placed into slavery as well. They were referring to themselves being equal to the “royalty of Europe” and their system has only changed faces, and names since then and nothing else. After the election of Donald Trump to the most powerful office on the planet, not by a majority vote but by a system used in the 18th century to the present the rest of humanity cannot afford to allow the USA to exist in its present form for much longer, the laws of self preservation will take command. Indeed, “if the USA were any other criminal nation the ‘Americans’ would invade the USA to keep the world safe”.

  • walterjessesmith

    Yes, there is food for thought here. Unfortunately, the writing is so sloppy and poorly presented, it is difficult throughout to discern where, or even if, the author has any thought more worthy of attention than the latest Trump tweet.

    Here is an example, and one of the more intelligible ones: the last “paragraph.”

    “After the elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany this year,
    beyond its national agenda, the Trump administration succeeds in
    creating a new international order based on illiberal democracy, we
    should start to worry because war will not be far away.”

    Yes, it may be common to entirely elide subjects from sentences; does this make it artfully clear writing? Who will know what about what emerges following “the elections in the Netherlands, France and Germany this year…”? As for what “the Trump administration succeeds in creating” we may already be near the answer: nothing at all but revealing to the whole world that the USA has long been exactly what Mao named it in the 1950s: a paper tiger, albeit one now going up in rapidly expanding flames. As best we might discern what the twit accomplishes, if anything at all, from a distant US province, the generals and spooks are already running the show, to the extent any one is. And no one knows what their consensus is better than Andrew has already revealed it through several recent essays.

    The essay above needs a writer to present something more intelligible to an editor. Then, it will further need an editor to make that writing intelligible to a general educated audience. As it now stands, well, it might make something a sophomore could pass off as original, if seriously flawed on multiple fronts.