tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5169130203475264933.post3303316229559457552..comments2019-08-23T01:33:26.419-04:00Comments on Uskowi on Iran - اسکویی در باره ایران: Zarif, Syria’s Muallem to Visit Moscow This WeekUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5169130203475264933.post-12689721958518139592014-01-13T18:50:42.468-05:002014-01-13T18:50:42.468-05:00The question is not a declaration to remove Assad,...The question is not a declaration to remove Assad, but not mentioning him in the language on any interim national-unity government. This might have the same effect, but that&#39;s how diplomatic language allows some room for interpretation, and hopefully gives Iran enough room to participate in Geneva II. Nader Uskowihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02808543185109048956noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5169130203475264933.post-32209530638275236172014-01-13T18:07:07.227-05:002014-01-13T18:07:07.227-05:00Actually Nader the Leveretts have a more accurate ...Actually Nader the Leveretts have a more accurate reading of Geneva I. Our American position is language that did not get included in the final draft of Geneva I communique but we&#39;re pushing it anyhow.<br /><br />http://goingtotehran.com/is-obama-trying-to-resolve-or-prolong-the-conflict-in-syria<br /><br />And here&#39;s the URL of the actual Geneva I agreement doc:<br /><br />http://www.un.org/News/dh/infocus/Syria/FinalCommuniqueActionGroupforSyria.pdf<br /><br />Nowhere in the communique does transition equate towards a removal of Assad. However what we&#39;re insisting on from Iran is endorsement of our position of language that didn&#39;t make it into the final communique, which is also rejected by Russia and China.<br />Mark Pyruzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00595161519097596575noreply@blogger.com