Appellate Court Hears Oral Arguments in Van Houten Case

Wednesday, April 24th, 2019





The court will have 90 days to publish an opinion.


This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

37 Responses to Appellate Court Hears Oral Arguments in Van Houten Case

  1. Gina says:


  2. Pam says:


  3. Cybele Moon says:


  4. NoJusticeNoPeace says:


    Look. It. Up.




    Same tag she placed on HER victims.

  5. Robin Olson says:


  6. Alexander S Hill says:


  7. Cybele Moon says:


  8. Columbo says:

    Newsom is a very busy man. He’s busy making sure his entire state goes against the Federal government and that the entire state is a sanctuary for illegal aliens. He’s busy making sure the citizens of his state are exposed to as much crime as possible from the illegals he allows into his state, and that taxpayers pay for their schooling, care and welfare. Yet, we’re supposed to believe that the only person that’s dangerous is 69 year old LVH.

    Newsom is busy making sure thousands of illegals and homeless people across the state aren’t held accountable for crapping and pissing in the streets of his state.

    Newsom is busy making sure hundreds of thousands of hypodermic needles are passed out by the state to the drug addicts across the state, so that they can publicly shoot up in front of school children. And he’s busy making sure the addicts and illegals aren’t held responsible for throwing hundreds of thousands of those needles on the streets of the cities in California.

    But one thing he’s NOT going to do is his job. He’s not going to follow the recommendations of parole board members because he’s too busy playing politics. Liberals don’t do what’s right, they just play politics and try to stay in power.

    No, things aren’t looking very good for Leslie. The 3 judge panel is trying to shirk their responsibility and kick the can down the road. And if it comes down to the liberal Newsom, who loves to take up the fight for illegals and murderers (except the Manson followers, of course), then Leslie might as well start planning for her next parole hearing in a year or two.

    The people of California deserve as much trouble and crap as possible for continuing to elect the fools they do. The fools they elect do as much as possible to get around the law and to make life in their state as hard as possible for the citizens.

  9. Columbo says:

    Oh, I forgot one!

    Newsom is busy making sure the murderers in his state are NEVER put to death! NO DEATH PENALTY IN CALIFORNIA, so sayeth Gavin Newsom! He is busy giving his middle finger to the family members who are waiting to see justice done after their loved ones were murdered.

    But no justice for Leslie! That’s the logic liberals follow! Sure, she’s paid her dues and she’s not dangerous, but Newsom has more political races to win, and that’s the only thing that’s important.

    Ever wonder why liberals are always quick to punish the law-abiding citizens of their state (with sky-high taxes and ridiculous environmental regulations), but then they go out of their way to defend murderers, illegal aliens and drug addicts who break the law? Exactly where is the logic in that?

    But the thing that’s the most illogical of all is that the citizens of California keep ELECTING people like Newsom. The people ELECT people who don’t respect them and politicians that make their life harder. So they deserve as much hardship as possible.

  10. Cybele Moon says:



  11. Peter says:


  12. Cybele Moon says:


  13. Peter says:


  14. Okanahan says:


  15. Peter says:


    Just sayin’

  16. Cybele Moon says:


  17. Peter says:


  18. Alexander S Hill says:


  19. Pam says:


  20. Peter says:


  21. NoJusticeNoPeace says:


    Or justice.

    What evah.

  22. Pam says:


  23. Columbo says:

    Do you know what “political prisoner” is referring to? Apparently not, or you wouldn’t waste time bringing up the crimes she was sentenced to prison for (but NOT for life….which is very important).

    Being a “political prisoner” is simply a person who is STILL in prison, even though they have met the state’s criteria for release. And in Leslie’s case, she met the criteria for release LONG ago!

    Another way some define being a “political prisoner” is when the person is STILL in prison when others that were found guilty of the same crime (or worse) have been paroled in the state of California… some cases NUMEROUS years prior.

    California’s criteria for parole should be fair and consistent across the prison population. Why would anyone disagree with that? The problem is that it’s NOT fair and consistent across the prison population.

    The ONLY reason Leslie is still in prison is because it just so happens that she was associated with the Manson group. Even the prosecutors predicted that, based on what she actually DID, she would probably be out of prison around 40 years of age. Well…29 years later, she’s STILL in prison.

    And that’s ONLY because she’s a “political prisoner”. There’s simply no debating the issue. She has been paroled by the Board multiple times, yet, she is STILL in prison. Why?

    Therefore, not only is she a “political prisoner,” she is also receiving “cruel and unusual punishment,” which is against the law.

    When people continue to maintain she should die in prison, they aren’t even arguing the facts of the case. When people say such things they are simply giving their personal opinion of what should happen. But Leslie IS eligible for parole. Her sentence is NOT “life without parole”. Therefore, depending on a variety of variables, she IS eligible to be released.

    It’s as simple as that. Don’t know why there’s disagreement on the issue. She IS eligible for parole, and she has been a perfect prisoner for nearly 50 years. She should be paroled, based on the law, because there is no legitimate reason to still hold her.

  24. John Birr says:


  25. Pam says:


  26. Christy says:




  27. Christy says:


  28. says:



  29. Ben Gurecki says:

  30. Cybele Moon says:

    Columbo, Christy, Pam et al, interesting topic always!


  31. Kelly says:


  32. Star Blazers says:


  33. Christy says:


  34. Christy says:



  35. Christy says:



  36. Susie says:


Leave a Reply to Christy Cancel reply
