Complications from Polanski-related soul death

I’ve always* found Johnny Depp to be a tad bit pretentious (you’re from Kentucky, please stop pretending you’re European — see also Madonna), but since I love his films and his ability to play a wide array of characters (or at least four variations on Captain Jack Sparrow, as it were), I don’t pay his real-life persona much mind. Unfortunately, living in blissful ignorance about celebrities has gotten much harder in the digital age, and damn near impossible in the wake of all the hubbub surrounding Roman Polanski.  

Thinking too hard about all the actors, writers, directors and producers who have come out in support of Polanski almost prompts me to never watch a movie again. I mean, Terry Gilliam? Guillermo del Toro and Alfonso Cuarón? Ugh. And, now, with Depp saying “Roman Polanski is not a predator” because he’s 75 and has “two beautiful kids” and isn’t “out on the street doing horrible, horrible things,” a little bit more of my movie-loving soul has died. Look, I know Depp has worked with Polanski. I’m sure they hang out and have a grand old time. But he really needed to drink a giant cup of STFU when the reporter asked him that question.

To suggest that a 75-year-old man can’t be a sexual predator is so mind-boggling. I wasn’t aware that there’s an age cap on perversity and crime. Ditto for the “out on the street” assertion. Roman Polanski didn’t rape a 13-year-old “out on the street.” Because he’s privileged and famous, with endless resources at his disposal, he did it in a house, behind closed doors. And then he got off scot-free. For all the people crying and whining about how he’s suffered enough because he spent 30 years away from American soil to avoid prosecution…it’s not like he was locked up in a garrett with no running water. He was making movies, making a shit ton more money than most people will see in their lives. He was not being punished for his crimes simply by the virtue of living in France. I don’t care if there was hinkiness at the trial and people scheming against Polanski behind the scenes, the fact remains that he raped a girl, pled guilty, and then didn’t do his time.

And like so many in the blogosphere, I have to wonder how Depp and other parents of young daughters who have come out in support of Polanski would feel if somebody had drugged and assaulted their child. Would it be so easy to dismiss the attacker as a harmless old man who needs to be left alone to make his art? Would 30 years really erase his deeds?

Maybe it’s fitting that Depp’s next big role is as the Mad Hatter, because it certainly feels like he’s living in Wonderland.

*Okay, I didn’t think he was pretentious on 21 Jump Street.


4 thoughts on “Complications from Polanski-related soul death

  1. I so totally agree with you Mala. And I’m saddened that Depp has spoken out in support of Polanski. The man drugged and raped a 13 year old girl. I don’t care that Polanski, in some weird way, thought that the whole thing was consensual or not. Or that the victim has forgiven him and doesn’t want him prosecuted. The man committed a crime and if he had just stood trial and taken his punishment like a man, he wouldn’t be 75 years old and facing prison. Does Depp not remember that Polanski was also in a relationship with Nastassia Kinski that started when she was a teenager? I man like Polanski doesn’t have to troll the streets, he’s powerful in the movie industry, and Mothers like his victims were probably constantly pushing their daughters in his face. If this were Depp’s daughter Lily, he wouldn’t certainly think differently. In fact since he does have a young daughter, I’m amazed that he’s taken the stance he has. Oh, and rapists don’t wear a sign saying ‘Hey I’m a rapist.”


    1. Yeah, there is just so, SO much wrong with this picture. And it really speaks about society’s views on rape in general. That it’s only “really” rape if some dirty, skeevy stranger corners a woman in an alley at knifepoint. That “regular” people or, in Polanski’s case, POWERFUL people, can’t be held accountable on the same level as a nameless psycho. It’s like they’re saying, “Rapists are, you know, *rapists*.” Not husbands and fathers and boyfriends. Not, in some cases, women.

      It’s so effed up. And that celebrities are playing into the fallacies and validating Polanski just sickens me. I guess Depp won’t care if Lily, like Nastassia, in a few years hooks up with a man old enough to be her father?


  2. I totally agree Mala. If this was just any other guy who raped a person and evaded justice, people would be up in arms. Polanski basically left the country and continued to flaunt the fact that he was free after committing a crime, with every film he made. There is a misunderstanding that being a celebrity provides a “different” set of rules. I think it would be more appropriate for celebrities to just say “the justice system should handle it” than to share their opinion. It’s disgusting how people are trying to defend Polanski, celebrities actually have some influence on people and should just keep silent on things that have nothing to do with them.


    1. If this was just any other guy who raped a person and evaded justice

      This is an especially salient point. What’s to stop people from using a “Polanski defense” now, and fleeing the country instead of facing prosecution? Why is okay for Polanski to do so, but not your average joe pedophiliac rapist off the street? Because Polanski has money?

      It’s just sad and pathetic and gross.


Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s
