Monday, August 15, 2016



Soros, who for years has allegedly been pulling the strings behind US Presidents and State Department chiefs through his 'philanthropic' refugee charities and 'open society' groups, is known to have been funding the invasion of the European Union by illegal immigrants from Africa, the middle east and further afield. The Wikileaks documents show him to have sent a message to Hillary Clinton through his “special advisor” Jonas Rolett.

Rolett, who is listed as “Special Advisor to the Chair” on Soros’s Open Society Foundations website, sent a message to then-State Department official Richard Verma. Mr. Verma duly passed the message along to an e-mail chain including Hillary’s top foreign affairs advisor Jacob Sullivan, her Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin, Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Philip Gordon, as well as a recipient “William J” – believed to be William Joseph Burns who was then Deputy Secretary of State.

The e-mails audit path begins with Verma forwarding a message, dated January 24 2011, from Rolett with the note: "Below message is from George Soros for the Secretary. Understand his organization was sending through other channels as well".

Rolett’s message continues beneath, stating: "Rich, Here’s the text of the message. I’m available to talk at any time. Thanks, Jonas".

Then follows what can only be construed as instructions for the Secretary of State from Democratic Party donor Soros, who has so far given her over $7 million this election cycle:

Dear Hillary,


I believe two things need to be done urgently:


2. Appoint a senior European official as a mediator.





Thank you,

George Soros

Days after the message was sent, Mr. Lajcak, named in the message, was sent to the Albania in order to negotiate the situation. At the time Mr Lajcak said it was up to Albania’s leaders "to do what we ask them to do".

Soros and his Hedge fund teams are known for manipulating major world events for both his ideological (Oligarchical globalism) and financial interests. In the U K he earned the title of the man who "broke the Bank of England" during one of the worst financial scams in the country’s recent history. On ‘Black Wednesday’, when Britain withdrew from the European Exchange Rate Mechanism, Mr. Soros made over $1bn in one day. Somehow he had known of the imminent withdrawal and 'going short' on the Pound currency. This means he made forward contracts to sell UK pounds at a very favourable price to buyers although at the time he did not hold enough British currency to fulfill those orders. He was betting (successfully, but was it really a bet?) that before the contract had to be completed his organisation would be able to buy UK currency for significantly less than the price he was committed to sell at.

His organisations, including Open Society Foundation, International Rescue, Democracy Spring and International Migration Initiative have also recently been responsible for agitating against the new, nationalist political movements, including Polish government, as well as in his home country of Hungary, where President Viktor Orban has repeatedly blamed him for the migrant crisis, claiming his staff are “drawing a living” from the problem.

In May, Breitbart London exclusively revealed the words of Tomasz Piotr Poreba – a former Adviser to the Committees on Foreign Affairs and Regional Development in the European Parliament – who said: “Not so long ago relations between the Clintons and billionaire Soros were revealed… Soros supports Clintons and Clinton followed his order. That is no secret.”

At the same time Mr. Orban declared: “…here, in Central Europe a shadow power exists, which is linked to George Soros, he is one of the most important sponsors of the Democratic Party, so I have to say that although the mouth belongs to Clinton, the voice belongs to George Soros”.

Mr. Soros recently called for the overturning of the Brexit vote to leave the European Union, and the Wall Street Journal revealed the multi-billionaire, while backing Mrs. Clinton to the tune of millions, is betting against U.S. stocks.



What Is A Globalist? - Globalim Explained



Globalisation omnibus
America (catalogue)
Soros bets aainst Brexit - loses, now bets against Deutsche Bank and wins
Immigration crisis is a Soros scam
Elitist contempt for democracy
Debt: Feeding the monster
Labour's Corbyn links to Soros
Left wing intellectuals have always despised the masses
Soros involved in Ukraine crisis
New World Order (catalogue)
New World Order omnibus
Soros the New World Order Reptillian
NWO behind refugee crisis
Bulgaria Builds Massive Wall To Stop Migrant Invasion From Turkey
Migrants Hijack Refugee Welcome Centre In Southern Italy
Eurozone To Fail? George Soros Bets €100m AGAINST Deutsche Bank

Hollywood Celebrities Who Are Not Hillary Fans

Soros Sponsored "Democracy Spring" Launches Program Of Civil Disobedience
Anti-Trump Fascists Plan "Democracy Spring"
Soros Attacks Trump: The New World Order Are Afraid
European Governments Hold "Secret" Meeting To Dismantle Borderless Travel
Another Big Western Media Lie About Ukraine’s War
George Soros Unmasked As The Orchestrator Of Ukraine Chaos
European Genocide Through Mass Migration - A Long Term Agenda
US Puppet In Kiev Restarts War With Donbass Separatists
Julian Assange Says: “1,700 Emails In Hillary Clinton’s Collection” Proves She Sold Weapons To ISIS In Syria Posted on August 6, 2016 by admin
Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels
One Year of Silence on Hillary Clinton Uranium Deal
Whistleblower Claims "NSA Has All Of Hillary's Deleted Emails,"


How Media Distorted Syrian Ceasefire’s Breakdown

One of the constant themes of this jorunal has been the constant misrepresentation of world events, particularly the conflicts in the middle east and Ukraine to skew public perceprions and persuade voters and taxpayers that Russia and China pose a serious threat to the security of western nations. While we have no particular reason to feel any loyalty towards Russia, we do not believe that vast nation or it's leader Vladimir Putin pose any threat to the west. In fact it is the western powers, NATO and the European Union, and the Obama administration in the USA that have constantly sought to provoke Russia and China. 

Coverage in western media of the conflict in Syria, the failure of US and NATO efforts to contain ISIS, the Russian intervention and subsequent breakdown of the partial ceasefire in Syria has illustrated the way in which corporate news media distort public understanding of a major story that has implications for the whole world and could possibly develop into a global conflict. The problem is not that key events in this saga are unreported, but that they have been downplayed, the significance to the west glossed over so that the threat posed by the ongoing conflicts is minimised in the perception of people who rely on mainstream (print and broadcast) news.

One key event most people in the USA and Europe are blissfully unaware of was the major offensive launched in April by Al Nusra (Barack Obama's beloved 'moderate rebels, though in reality they are every bit as brutal and bloody as ISIS) alongside US-backed armed opposition groups. The offensive received minimal coverage in British, US and European 'quality' newspapers, ignored by more populist titles and hardly mentioned on TV news. Even the most diligent news junkie however, would not have read that the offensive broke the back of the partial ceasefire. On the contrary, they would have gotten the clear impression from following the major newspapers’ coverage that  systematic violations by the Assad government doomed the ceasefire from the beginning.

The Obama administration of course had no interest at all in defeating ISIS and Al Qaeda affiliated groups, Washington's priority, their only goal in fact, was to depose Assad and install a puppet government in his place. In this they were supported by Saudi Arabia and Qatar. 

Corporate media heralded the ceasefire agreement as a great triumph for Obama and his Secretary Of State Jophn Kerry when it was negotiated by the United States and Russia in February, 2016. The  Los Angeles Times (2/2/16) called it “the most determined diplomatic push to date aimed at ending the nation’s almost five-year conflict.” 


The fact that the US backed so - called 'moderate rebels' that were Washington's CIA-backed proxy, providing armed opposition to Assad, was in fact Al Nusra  and the jihadist Nusra Front was an issue US media studiously avoided mentioning. The link was exposed in British and European media where some well informed people were starting to worry that provoking Russia by attacking its ally Assad, while supporting those trying to overthrow his regime was not the wisest approach to the middle east crisis. 

 US and NATO Syria policy has been dependent on the military potential of the Nusra Front or Free Syrian Army or any of the names the jihadists have given themselves for leverage on the Syrian regime. The 'moderate rebels' were unable to operate in northwest Syria without support from jihadists and from the Islamist regime led by President Erdogan in Turkey. This central element in US Syria policy, which both the government and the media were unwilling to acknowledge, was a central obstacle to accurate coverage of what happened to the Syrian ceasefire.

The problem of framing the failure to deafeat ISIS as a triumph for US foreign policy began as soon as the ceasefire agreement was announced. The New York Times published  a news analysis on the wider issues that were raising tensions between the Obama administration and Russia and to “the gaping loophole” in the Syria ceasefire agreement: the fact that “it permits attacks against the Islamic State and the Nusra Front, an Al Qaeda affiliate, to continue.” The notion that the 'moderate rebels' of the Free
Syrian Army were separate from ISIS had by then been largely discredited.

Hawks in Washington argued the terms of the ceasfire meant Russia could continue to strike United States-backed rebel groups without fear…of Washington’s doing anything to stop them.

On the same day the Wall Street Journal reported that Obama’s “top military and intelligence advisers did not believe Russia would abide by the ceasefire in Syria and wanted to ready plans to increase pressure on Moscow by expanding covert support to rebels fighting the Russia-backed Assad regime.” For two of the country’s most prominent newspapers, it was thus clear that the primary context of the Syria ceasefire was not its impact on Syria’s population, but how it affected Washington's geopolitical ambitions for global hegemony. In 2012 or 13 we reported that the Syria conflict was in fact a US / NATO engineered proxy war with Russia.

Contrary to western propaganda about Russian intentions to take advantage of the agreement to hit US-supported Syrian opposition groups, as soon as the partial ceasefire agreement took effect on February 27, Russia released a map that designated “green zones” its air force would not strike. The green zones, according to the Russian Ministry of Defense, corresponded with Syrian opposition groups that had signed on to the ceasefire. Furthermore, Russia stopped bombing the Nusra-controlled areas of northwest Syria, instead focusing on ISIS targets further west, a scenario Pentagon spokesperson Jeff Davis confirmed on March 14.

But instead of separating themselves from Al Nusra, the US-supported (i.e. controlled) armed opposition joined forces with ISIS affiliated Al Nusra and its jihadist allies in a major offensive aimed at destroying the ceasefire. 

British middle east expert Charles Lister, a Foreign Offive adviser  on Islamic extremism in Syria, has reported being told by the commander of a US-backed armed group that around March 20, Nusra officials began a round of meetings with non-jihadist opposition groups from Hama, Latakia and southern Aleppo, including those supported by the United States, to persuade them to participate in a major offensive against the Assad regime, rather than in a ceasefire and political negotiations.

The media, having ignored the events leading up to the collapse of the ceasefire enthusiastically reported  the offensive launched on April 3 by Al Nusra and its “moderate” allies, heralding it as the turnaround in the course of conflict that would finally persuade Russia to abandon its ally and lead to the downfall of Assad. 

The Los Angeles Times reportted  a “punishing attack” by The Free Syrian Army and several “so-called moderate rebel factions” on the town of Al Eis, southwest of Aleppo, “overlooking the M5 highway, a vital artery connecting the Syrian capital, Damascus, in the southwest of the country, with the government-held city of Homs, in west-central Syria, and Aleppo in the north.

Associated Press reported that anti - Assad forces, together with US-supported factions in the Syrian opposition had “seized government positions in heavy fighting in northwestern Latakia province.” The story quoted Zakariya Qaytaz of the US-supported Division 13 brigade as telling the agency through Twitter: “The truce is considered over. This battle is a notice to the regime.”

The Nusra-led offensive was a decisive violation of the ceasefire, calculated by Washington to anger the Russians, whose intervention with their allies in Iran had halted the advance of ISIS in Syria and Iran, effectively frustrating the Moscow led policy of isolating the jihadists. It led to continued high levels of fighting in the most heavily populated area of  north west Syria, and Russian planes returned to Al Nusra controlled territory for the first time in nearly three months. Yet after the first reports on the offensive, Syria almost vanished from mainstream media until July. No US newspaper followed up over the story of vicious and destructive fighting, although British and European news did report events but with a strong anti Assad, anti Russian bias. Nobody on either side of the Atlantic took the time to analyze its significance in terms of US policy, or Washington's true motives in arming, funding and supporting “legitimate” armed opposition groups in trashing the ceasefire.

Syria US Proxy war
Syria US - UK hypocrisy
How Obama underestimated Syria
Couild syria trigger a nuclear war?
FUKUS axis war in Syria
Obama-Duterte Blow Up: What the Corporate Media Doesn’t Get

Why Does War Have To Be So Inevitable?

Syra: the real agenda
Obama's catastrophe in Syria
Obama and Al Qaeda allies?
Russia, Syria at war with Turkey
ISIS a US creation
ISIS oil trade with Turkey funds jihad
America's Iraq policy meltdown
America warmongering

Kerry Demolishes Obama's 'Moderate Rebels' Syria Narrative
USA Has Told Assad He Needs To Commence Handover Of Power In Syria by August Or Face Consequences
EU Sacrifices Kurds To Turkey's Imperial Ambition For Erdogan Help With Migrants
The Hidden Genocide In Syria:Obama's Moderate Rebels As Brutal As ISIS
Russian Foreign Affairs Dept Accuses Turkey Of Hindering Syrian Peace Talks

Anonymous FBI Informant Says Treason In Govt At The Highest Levels
Snowden Mocks Claims That Russia Hacked The Democrats Campaign Computer System
Will 'President Trump' Mean The End Of NATO?
Leaked DNC Emails Confirm Democrats Rigged Primary, Reveal Extensive Media Collusion
Hillary Clinton’s email problems just got off the scale worse
Wall Street 'Whistleblower' Exposes Clinton Foundation Fraud
Obama's Economy Is Bad; Clinton's Would Be Worse
Yes, the Panama Papers Could Really End Hillary Clinton’s Campaign

Songs of Glory
