2007 February

Homeopathy is life giving

by Dr.K.V.Natarajan
Life Giving Homeopathy

Homeopathic remedies are made the following way:

(This is written around 1800 AD).


It is space like.





K.V. Natarajan, Homoeopath.

Categories: Theory


Posts: 3
Reply #3 on : Tue April 17, 2007, 08:10:28
Dear Dr. Natarayan, Thank you for noticing and reacting to my previous comment. It is coherent with modern physics to view forces (e.g. gravitation force) as particels (e.g. graviton), smaller than electron indeed, and that "radioactive" is a term reserved for a very specific emission(one of the four basic interaction forces) not the kind you wanted to describe. "Induction energised" might suit the purpose fine though if you want to apply the same "qualiy of life property" we enter the scope of an (unsolved ?) philosophical problem, is "life quality" an endlessly divideble quality with its caracteristics buried in its indefinetely finest parts, or are these qualities acquired during the increase of complexicity of structures ? Modern science has a tendency to favore the latter, homeopathy seems to embrace the first option though it never seems a very conscious act. What is your point of view ?
Kind regards, FranÃƒÂ§ois

Posts: 3
Reply #2 on : Sun April 01, 2007, 19:41:28
Dear Francois, I am thankful for your comment. Already I was in a dilemma how to define the subatomic particle that is in the potentised homoeopathy medicine and I found it is induction energised matter and not 'sub atomic radio activated particles'. It is a matter smaller than an electron. I am not a college product.Excuse me for the confusion. Thank you for your getting interested in my way of understanding Homoeopathy.
Regards, K.V.Natarajan.
PS - I corrected in several places the original text - Peter ter Beek / coordination

Posts: 3
Reply #1 on : Sun February 04, 2007, 14:45:16
Dear Dr. Natarayan and readers,

I have red this article with interest. IÃ‚Â´m very encouraging towards anyone who tries to contribute to the building of a theory about the functioning of "subatomic" potentiations. The reason for my comment is that I would suggest that we use terms understandeble either by being already known (in homeopathic theory itself or in any other field) or by a newly given definition. It seems to me the use of "radioactive power" as known cannot be the same as the authors supposed intent. Could the author or anyone else try to reformulate for better understanding.
Cordial greetings and all succes wished with this site. FranÃƒÂ§ois Weber

Write a comment

  • Required fields are marked with *.