Category: theories of American politics

The Cold Wind of White Disaffection is Blowing

Some mainstream political writers are starting to get it (emphasis added in all cases).

And that brings us to the big lesson the GOP should take from the entire Trump affair: There is another side to the Republican Party, one that the GOP has tried to ignore, and can ignore no longer. It’s a side of the party that has learned to distrust its leaders on immigration, to be suspicious of a turbo-charged capitalism that threatens their way of life. And it may be a side of the party that is needed to return the GOP to presidential victories. It is the forgotten part of the Nixon-Reagan coalition. And by being ignored, it has turned angrier and more toxic.

But whoever eventually vanquishes Trump will still have to address the Trump phenomena. The billionaire has energized a large block of disaffected white voters who feel betrayed by the establishment of both parties and lost in an increasingly globalized economy. But he has also alienated huge swaths of the electorate with his angry rhetoric about immigrants and Muslims. Whoever gets the GOP nomination will have to figure out how to keep Trump’s supporters in the fold and get them out on Election Day to defeat Clinton in key swing states where the Democratic nominee is likely to dominate among women and other key demographic groups. 

A menu of supply side tax cuts that deliver huge benefits to the wealthy and big corporations won’t do it. It’s not clear what will. Even if Trump falls, Republicans will still have a big Trump problem.

If Whites want to stop being objectively worthless, they have to stop giving their votes away to Republican cuckservatives.  The Republican party must be destroyed.  White voters should take a long-term view, and stop being pulled into short-term “football game” views of elections. It’s not “their team” against “our team.”  It’s all about forcing the System to take White interests seriously – which will be the first step toward the collapse of the System.

There’s a cold wind blowing, cuckservatives. Do you feel the chill yet?

Predatory Capitalism Exploits White American Individualism

Manipulating middle class and working class White voters.



Missing the Meaning of Trump

Even Buchanan does not get it.
The major issue is not whether he wins, but why is he getting so much support.  Putting aside all the girlish shrieking about “the Trumpening,” the reality is the Trump is a fairly lousy candidate: an obnoxious buffoon, a realty show star, ill informed, whose views on legal immigration are questionable, whose daughter is married to a Jew, etc.
But he is by far the best of the bunch, and the only one who can be called a “right-wing populist,” despite his pro-fatcat economic views.
Nevertheless, it is NOT business as usual in American politics. One wonders – if Duke was running this year, how much support would he get?  
And all the talking heads who assert that “the GOP could win the national election in 2016 by shifting left on immigration” still don’t get it. Yes, most of the stupid base may still come out to support that, but enough may stay home to ensure a Democrat victory.
At some point, even dumb Whites can’t continue to be fooled all of the time.

Pathetic Trash Douthat

Surprise!  Cuckservatives don’t like third parties. 

In certain ways this narrowing can be good for the republic. Elites can have wisdom that populists lack…


Wisdom about what? How to sacrifice national interests on the altar of elite interests?  How have these elites performed for America?  How are they doing for a Europe being invaded by the Third World?

…certain ideas deserve suppression…

And who decides what these ideas are?  You?  Elites? Jews? NGOs?  Who? One could imagine a KGB agent ripping up a Solzhenitsyn book while asserting “certain ideas deserve suppression.”  What a piece of shit thing to say. How about all the “good” ideas fairly compete in the intellectual marketplace with all the “should be suppressed” ideas?

…and multiparty systems are more likely to hand power to extremists or buffoons…

No worries!  Look at all the high-quality leaders our two-party system has produced! Clinton being fellated in the White House by a Jewess, Bush who started an unnecessary war with the insightful analysis of “Fuck Saddam,” and a purple-lipped mulatto who attended a Black radical church and then tried to defend that by attacking his own White grandmother.  No buffoons or extremists there!
(It’s a good thing for the country that neither Henry Wallace’s effectively pro-Soviet leftism nor George Wallace’s segregationist populism outlived their respective third-party bids.)


And how are we better off today that Wallace wasn’t elected President?

Trump Hits the Sweet Spot

Donald Trump: Right-Wing Populist.
Contrary to the Beavis-and-Butthead onanistic fanboys and their girlish shrieks of “Trump has tight game,” and contrary to the pathetically self-interested “awkward squad” miscegenators and their claim that Trump is the “HBD candidate,” the ultimate reality of Trump is that he is running a campaign of unabashed right-wing populism.
Some time ago, on a Counter-Currents podcast, Greg Johnson asserted that “right-wing populism is the sweet spot of American politics,” and Trump’s popularity has proven Johnson correct. In fact, the American voter is hungry for any kind pf populism, including the left-wing variety (Bernie Sanders), but it is right-wing populism which is the more potent force and which has the Establishment, particularly its Levantine corner (“the goy mobs have their pitchforks out”), so worried.
Thus, whatever happens with Trump’s candidacy, even if he collapses into cuckservatism, his value is in unleashing the genie of right-wing populism from the constipated bottle of American politics. Trump is therefore the Bringer of Chaos in American politics, and for that we should all be grateful.
The mettle of White Americans will be demonstrated if the Establishment is unable to get that genie back into the bottle. After all, the Republican Establishment can manipulate things to make sure that a Bush or Rubio is nominated, but can they be confident of a high turnout of the White base (what the Bush family calls the “extra chromosome crowd”) to ensure Election Day victory?  And if Trump runs as a third party candidate (which he should, if he is not nominated and if he really is “alpha”), then the chance that the GOP Establishment comes out of all this a winner is ZERO.
Bring on the chaos!

Is Trump Mainstreaming?

In a word: no.
Trump is no racial nationalist. He has not even been much of a “Republican conservative” before this election – he has contributed to, and socialized with, leading Democrats, he has praised legal immigration, he has previously denounced the idea of “self-deportation” as too tough.  He’s befriended Negro celebrities on his TV show, and currently has Negro supporters. These things are known to the public. His Republican opponents have publicly pointed out Trump’s past political “promiscuity,” public love of pop culture has made them familiar with Trump’s persona on “Celebrity Apprentice,” and the mass media is recently focusing on Negresses supporting Trump (perhaps in a sly fashion to chip away at Trump’s support in “implicit Whiteness”). Thus, despite leftist hysteria to the contrary, according to public perception, Trump is merely a boisterous, egocentric businessman and celebrity, at most a “Republican conservative,” certainly no racialist or far-right nationalist.
Another point: it may be “illogical,” but the importance of public perception means that two different candidates, coming from two different political pedigrees, can promote exactly the same policies but be perceived and received by the public in completely different manners.  Thus, it will not serve mainstreaming nationalists to mirror Trump’s aracial rightist populism.  When a Republican conservative comes out strongly against illegal immigration, that is perceived as radical, cutting edge, populist, and exciting. If the same policies and talking points are expounded by a far-right racialist/nationalist, the perception will be of weakness, mainstreaming compromise, unexciting centrism, and being untrustworthy.  It is not only the political positions that matter, but the public perception of how a candidate is moving towards those positions.  If a candidate sticks with their principles – that’s great.  If a candidate moves in a more radical direction – great too. However, if those same positions are taken by a candidate moving towards the center – that’s not good at all, that’s the “beta/omega male” attitude toward politics – it will disgust and alienate the candidate’s base of supporters, make the candidate lose the respect of friend and foe alike, and also most probably fail to win over many of the targeted centrist voters, who may not at all trust this sudden lurch to the center. Indeed, one often sees the opposite, as centrists like Sarkozy and McCain win elections or primaries by moving to the right (which is more successful since rightist voters are more naive and/or desperate and believe that these shifts to the right are real, in contrast to centrist or leftist voters who are more mature and skeptical. Is Trump feinting to the right as well?).