I'm setting up a (sort of) powerful workstation for SW development work on Linux. It's a Xeon system with multiple cores, 32GB memory, a large HDD and a 120 GB SSD (Samsung MZ7WD120HAFV a.k.a. SM843T).

I have to decide which partitions to put on the HDD, and which on the SSD. I'm getting conflicting recommendations on this question:

  • "Don't put frequently-write-intensive partitions on the SSD, you'll shorten its lifetime significantly, it might fail within several months that way." (similar to this answer)
  • "If you have a 2nd or 3rd generation SSD (that means any drive with TRIM) then you don't have to treat it any different than a regular HDD: you can put write intensive files, journal and swap on it." (from this answer here on the site)

Both performance and stability are important to me, although this is not a mission-critical server. So, what should I do?


  • Of course, I'll have some sort of backup scheme for my critical data, the question is not about that.
  • 1
    I've not posted this as an answer as it's anecdotal, but I've had my Windows partition on my SSD for two years with no problem. That's fairly write-intensive. Having a backup and recovery plan is important for ANY sort of drive - I've had plenty of spinning-rust drives fail on me too. – Cylindric Sep 16 '13 at 10:19
  • The words "Enterprise SSD" goes a long way in these situtions. – Chad Harrison Sep 16 '13 at 14:18

The Samsung SM843T is a very nice looking SSD. The key points you want to look at in an SSD datasheet are the figures talking about drive longevity, which may be expressed as device writes per day or TB written. The SM843T datasheet has both, and more usefully has the figure for both random and sequential workloads.

A random workload means 100% random 4K writes with an IO Queue depth of 32 - this is the figure that most SSD datasheets will quote, particularly for consumer grade drives that have figures like '20GB/day for 3 years'.

The SM843T, however, claims 2x device writes per day for 5 years for random workloads, or 11 x device writes per day for sequential workloads. This is much better than any of the other consumer grade SSDs currently available (and indeed, the SM843T is marketted as a datacentre drive).

I won't say you won't wear this SSD out ahead of time, because I'm sure you could (2x device writes per day on a 120GB drive is only a constant ~690 IOPs, which isn't that much after all), but if you're just doing software development on this machine I really doubt you'll come anywhere close to those figures.

If you're interested, you can monitor the SSD's internal SMART counters for wearout. The exact attributes are different depending on the SSD controller used, but if you want the general gist of what to look for then I wrote about it here.


Certainly you can shorten an SSD's lifetime by using heavy writes but this has come on enormously in the last few years to a point where it's perfectly acceptable to write multiple petabytes over the course of a single SSD's life - so long as you pick the right product.

You don't mention which OS you're planning on using but Samsung has a Windows utility called 'Magician' that lets you change the percentage of your disk used for write-wearing - if you increase this you will be able to write more for longer onto the same disk - not sure if there's a Linux version of it.

Either way so long as you try to keep below say 30GB/day you should get at least 3 years out of the SSD, perhaps a lot more.

  • I've now mentioned it's Linux. – einpoklum Sep 16 '13 at 15:14

Your Answer

