Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Islamic State - Cameron Loses The Plot Along With His Marbles

The British people are beginning to wonder what it is with their Prime Minister that compels him to cave in to every Muslim demand no matter how trivial or ridiculous. In the face of the ever growing hostility between the real British citizen and the imported anti-British Muslim community, David Cameron always comes down on the side of his most favoured client group.

To make matters worse he often chastises the real British people for their non acceptance of the alien way of life which all and sundry treat as incompatible with their own Judeo-Christian heritage. By insinuating that those who disagree with his own stance are bigots and Islamophobes, Cameron is using the same dirty tactics as the 'progressive' left such as demonisation and smear.

Cameron - along with his cronies and the like minded 'progressive' activists that are committed to imposing 'multi-culturalism' - must be the only one left in the country who is still pushing the "religion of peace" nonsense with reference to Islam.

Bearing in mind that Muslims comprise only four percent of the total population, one has to wonder whether Cameron has lost the plot, along with his sanity, with his latest order that the BBC "stop calling IS an Islamic State".

Regardless of the support among British Muslims for the Islamic State, he is concerned that they will 'recoil' at the phrase being used to justify the 'perversion of a great religion'.

In other words, on planet Cameron, Muslims will be offended by using the word 'Islamic' to describe the Islamic State which is called for by Mohammad and written in the Koran.

Incidentally, one would think that with all the taxpayer funded spin doctors that Cameron employs to stop him sounding like an idiot in public they would have explained to him that the abbreviation ISIL that he uses to describe the Islamic State means 'the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant'.

Cameron completely loses the plot when he explains that "saying ISIL is better than using Islamic State because it is in my view neither Islamic nor a state".

Roughly translated for those of us on planet earth who may be confused: Cameron is saying that the Muslim community will not 'recoil' or be offended if he uses an abbreviation for Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant in place of Islamic State because the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant is different to the Islamic State which is neither Islamic nor a state. Got that? If not that's too bad because it only gets worse.

Without consulting the wider British public - they can now be ignored as the general election was over on May 7th -  the political class from all parties have jumped on the 'progressive' bandwagon by joining the Prime Minister in his call for the BBC to stop using the term 'Islamic State' to describe the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

To spare the relatively small Muslim community from offence and to prevent any further radicalisation of an already radicalised community, Honourable Members of Parliament are pushing the BBC, along with the government-media complex and the public at large, into using the term 'Daesh' in place of Islamic State, IS, ISIS or ISIL.

Daesh is a term based on an Arab acronym: al-Dawra al-Islamiya fil Iraq wa'al Sham which translates into...........Islamic State of Iraq and Sham (Syria).

Only in the remote, dysfunctional world of the political class is such insane behaviour treated as normal; not only has David Cameron lost the plot along with his marbles, so has the entire government, the establishment, the BBC and anyone else that lends them credence.

Due to this appalling behavior by the out-of-touch political class I will refer from now on to the blood drenched, barbaric state being set up by Muslims, many of them documented citizens of Great Britain, as the Islamic State regardless of any offence that may be taken.

Meanwhile in the real world - the one inhabited by real people who suffer the real consequences of imposed multi-culturalism  and enrichment- young white girls are still being groomed, gang raped and pimped out by David Cameron's most indulged client group who can do no wrong.

Mosques and madrassas are still being built despite local opposition, hate preachers remain on the streets extolling the virtues of the Islamic State and openly recruiting for ISIS. Volunteers, young and old, male and female, continue to make their way to Syria to fulfill the calling of Allah and Mohammad as written in the Koran.

It doesn't bother the politicians that Great Britain's capital city, once the epicenter of a proud nation, is now increasingly referred to as Londonistan; as a matter of fact they seem rather proud of it.

It would be interesting to hear what excuses the politicians have for the eighty percent of London's Muslims who support ISIS or the one tenth of all Londoners that view the Islamic State favourably.

Worryingly, support for ISIS is greatest among the under-25's. These are not as the political class would have us believe, young, impressionable youths who were radicalised by social media and the Internet, they are born and bred adherents to a cult that worships death like civilised people worship life.

All one has to do is read their holy book; far from being the religion of peace that the politicians claim it is, Muslims are taught from birth that every non-Muslim is inferior, an infidel that must be dominated or killed.

(Get your copy here for free)

In conclusion it is worth reiterating that Cameron along with the political class and the establishment are putting their cultural replacement agenda before the safety and well being of the British people with the result that there will be even more blood on their hands than there is now after the 7/7 bombings and the brutal killing of Fusilier Lee Rigby.

Don't miss A Snivelling Prime Minister by The Mellow Jihadi

Monday, June 29, 2015

Jurassic World - Political Life Imitating Art Also Causes Havoc And Mayhem

"Life Imitates Art Far More Than Art Imitates Life" - Oscar Wilde

On a lighter note, the ancient philosophical discussion about whether art imitates life or life imitates art has finally been put to rest by the latest box office blockbuster Jurassic World.

Without giving too much away, the fourth in the Jurassic Park series of movies centers on a theme park populated with cloned dinosaurs where the star attraction is a creature named Indominus Rex. 

This monster has been created using the DNA of several predatory dinosaurs mixed with that of modern day animals. Velociraptors, the intelligent and calculating stars of the previous Jurassic movies have been trained to accept Indominus as their alpha.

Inevitably Indominus escapes causing havoc and mayhem and leaving death and destruction its wake.

The highly successful series can be considered art encompassing several disciplines including script writing, acting and visual presentation.

It doesn't take a giant leap in imagination to see that this scenario is happening in the present day political world. Since democracy has been reduced to nothing more than a ballot every few years it has allowed a small elite who mindlessly pursue political power in order to dominate others to pervert the process.

Looking at the modern political world one should be forgiven for seeing the parallels with the artistic world of the film creators. A group of politicians has been created by the power brokers who are so alike they could be clones sharing the same DNA.

With the removal of honesty and integrity from the electoral process politicians have been indoctrinated with the same disciplines as the movie industry such as script writing, acting and visual presentation. These fakes look the same, they talk the same, they behave in the same manner, they use the same publicity tricks to con the public into believing they care.

Nothing could be further from the truth; once these clones have been let loose on an unsuspecting world they cause havoc and mayhem, leaving death and destruction in their wake.

Despite a population of some three hundred and fifty million, the best the American people can come up with are dinosaurs in the form of a sixty-seven year old Hillary Clinton and seventy-four year old Bernie Sanders; should these two front runners trip up along the campaign trail then seventy-two year old Joe Biden or sixty-six year old Elizabeth Warren are waiting in the wings.

In truth it doesn't matter which one is chosen, they can only offer the modern political equivalent of a primeval swamp i.e socialism. Like the dinosaurs of the Jurassic era these people do not have the brain capacity to think outside of their instinctive behavior, thus even though socialism continually fails wherever it is imposed, its all they have to offer.

On the British side of the pond things are no better. The choices for leader of the Labour Party after Red Ed Miliband's epic failure at the last election are straight out of the Dipshitodocus enclosure.

Andy Burnham, who has earned himself the moniker of 'Body Bags' Burnham after presiding over the unnecessary deaths of twelve hundred patients at the Mid Staffs NHS trust while he was Minister of Health.

Yvette Cooper, the other half of the husband and wife team comprising herself and Ed Balls. Both Secretaries of State for the disastrous Blair/Brown governments which engineered the bankruptcy of the British economy, the catastrophic drop in educational standards and the mass immigration disaster.

Jeremy Corbyn, a hardline socialist from the old school who is so off the scale he boasts friendship with the Hamas and Hezbollah leadership.

Liz Kendall, without a care for the disaster that was visited upon the British people by her mentor, she is touting herself as a 'Blairite', the fabulously wealthy former Labour leader who famously claimed that "he came to socialism via Marxism".

Unfortunately, the people on both sides of the pond who continue to vote these people into office have not evolved beyond the Neanderthal stage and have not yet developed the intelligence to see beyond the tips of the flint spearheads.

All us Homo Sapiens can do is to hope that human evolution speeds up so that the Neanderthal voters become extinct and take the political dinosaurs with them.


Thursday, June 25, 2015

British ISIS Killers Are Radicalised At Home From Birth

                                           "I don't want my daughters to grow up in England"

                                          "I don't like the UK, it's becoming more like America"

                                           "I don't want my children growing up in this society"

                                         I want to live in Saudi Arabia because I don't like the UK"

These statements are attributed to thirty three-year old Zorah Dawood who left our green and pleasant land to take up residence with ISIS in Syria along with her two children aged five and eight.

She was accompanied by her two sisters Khadija aged thirty and Sugra aged thirty-four along with their combined brood aged three to fifteen.
(Full story here)

These ISIS supporters join the hundreds if not thousands of other British documented Muslims who despise the British people and reject utterly the British way of life, making their way to Syria in order to fulfill their destiny and the requirements of their prophet.

The attitude of the government and the establishment, including the police and the BBC, is indicative of the yawning chasm that exists between them and the majority of the British people they are supposed to serve.

Time and again when news that more Muslim males, females or families have gone missing from their mono-cultural ghettos, the government along with the police and the BBC 'fear' for their safety or 'fear' that they are heading to Syria to join the caliphate.

In truth there is a mutual disdain bordering on hatred between these two incompatible cultures whereby the vast majority of the British people don't 'fear' their disappearance at all, instead they bid them good luck, bon voyage and good riddance.

It is now generally accepted that the government and the establishment are using the Muslim community as a battering ram to impose a so called 'multi-cultural society' on an unwilling people on behalf of their masters in the EU/UN.

This deliberate policy manifests itself in a Statute Book full of hate crime legislation and a regime of rigidly policed political correctness that makes it virtually impossible to voice criticism, or any form of disagreement, for fear of prosecution.

In addition to this cordon of protection they have thrown around their client community the government and their agents continue to ignore reality by making excuses for the so called radicalisation of these ISIS volunteers.

When one looks in detail at the issue of British documented volunteers joining ISIS, it becomes obvious that the government is forced to make these excuses or else admit that the Muslim communities have not evolved away from the medieval desert death cult that is articulated in the Koran and are therefore incompatible with the British way of life.

The government claim that these jihadis were normal British citizens like any other then suddenly became blood thirsty savages by radicalising themselves using the Internet and social media.

The parents and families of these jihadis plead ignorance about radicalisation and have the temerity to blame the government and the police for not doing enough to prevent their offspring leaving to join ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

The excuses offered by David Cameron's former Cabinet member, Baroness Warsi, are risible beyond believe; it's no wonder she is regarded as an abject failure who was appointed on the basis of being a non-white Muslim woman (her words not mine) as opposed to merit.

Ignoring the fact that Great Britain's Muslim community is the most indulged in the land, Warsi has the gall to claim that the government has a deliberate policy of non-engagement with Muslims. She uses her standard accusation that any criticism of Islam is 'far right'.

Her nonsense was in response to a letter sent to mosques and Muslim organisations that rightly urged them to do more to root out terrorism following the Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris.

It's worth noting for Warsi's benefit that forty nine percent of her 3.4 million strong Muslim community endorse hate preachers, twenty seven percent support the Charlie Hebdo massacre and eleven percent support jihad.

 Also, ignoring the antics of the notorious hate preacher Anjem Choudary who, incidentally, is allowed to preach his filth and act as a recruiting agent for ISIS without fear of arrest, she claims that the government has 'failed to tackle Islamophobic language and hate crimes'.

(Watch Choudary harass a police officer over a Help for Heroes wristband here)

In reality, British Muslims are born and raised to be radical; not only is radical Islam in their genes it is reinforced every day of their lives by their culture and the religion they are subservient to and from which there is no escape.

The lady quoted at the start of this article along with her siblings are not immature, impressionable school kids, they are wives and mothers in their early and mid-thirties who have lived their lives in a free and open society.

The sad fact is that due to the requirements of the misogynistic cult they have been forced to follow they have not been allowed to participate in British life; instead they have been taught from birth that Great Britain is evil and must be subjugated or destroyed.

It is obvious from her second comment that Ms. Dawood has also been brought up to believe that America is the great Satan and Great Britain his willing apprentice. What kind of woman in the year 2015 would prefer to live in Saudi Arabia, or war torn Syria, as opposed to the United States of America or Great Britain?

The fact these women had taken their children, one only three years old, on a religious pilgrimage to Medina in Saudi Arabia, where non-Muslims are not allowed because they are regarded as infidels and therefore evil and unclean, confirms indoctrination of hate from childhood.

In conclusion it has to be said that these children, like all the other children who inhabit the thousands of mono-cultural, shariah controlled Muslim ghettos in Great Britain, are radicalised from birth and and it is unbecoming of the British government to claim otherwise.

Monday, June 22, 2015

Cameron's U-Turn On Immigrants But Where Can He Put Them All?

The capitulation over immigrant quotas by British Prime Minister David Cameron to the bureaucrats that run the European Union (EU) and the United Nations (UN) came as no surprise to the long suffering British people.

Policy u-turns and broken promises have become a feature of Cameron's premiership and serve as evidence that he does not have the authority to govern Great Britain because of his declared subservience to the supranational EU/UN world government wannabees.

No sooner than Cameron announces some policy initiative that puts the people's interest above that of the EU/UN or merely articulates the view of the majority of his citizens, some Brussels bureaucrat or European leader will publicly chastise him forcing a surrender. If that European leader happens to be German Chancellor Angela Merkel, his surrender is made in double quick time and is total.

What happened to the Bulldog spirit that saw the British people initially stand alone against the Kaiser and Hitler then go on to win two world wars remains a mystery.

This indomitable spirit, personified by Sir Winston Churchill, seems to be totally absent from David Cameron's government along with his like minded hangers-on and cronies; love her or loath her even the handbag swinging Margaret Thatcher had more cajones than all of this lot put together.

The media devoted disproportional column inches and air time to boosting Cameron's image by highlighting his stand against EU/UN quotas of refugees crossing Mediterranean into Europe using some obscure 'opt-out' clause.

The same prominence was not given to his sly u-turn which came to light when he announced that Great Britain would take in several hundred more refugees in addition to the quota he was supposedly fighting against.

(It's worth noting that his announcement, which will have severe repercussions for the British people, was made in Slovakia and not the British Parliament. This demonstrates not only Cameron's contempt for the British people but his contempt for democracy itself)

Assuming the dastardly deed is done and thousands more immigrants will be added to the half million that enter an overcrowded and creaking Great Britain legally and illegally every year, it is imperative that Cameron informs the people where and how he proposes to house and provide for them.

The British economy remains bankrupt and there is a dire shortage of jobs, housing, school places, transportation, and health care provision. Rough sleeping by homeless immigrants has reached record levels and stretches from London in the east to Cornwall in the west.

To give some idea of the size of the problem, the police were called recently to a brawl taking place in a two bedroom mid-terrace house in Oldham only to find twenty immigrant Romanians living there.

It's worth reminding ourselves that the multi-millionaire acting/celebrity fraternity led by award winning actress Emma Thompson recently demanded that Cameron accept more Syrian immigrants into Great Britain without informing the people where they should be housed, fed and watered or who is going to pick up the tab.

Since Thompson also campaigned against a Tesco superstore being built near one of her residences on the grounds that it would ruin the 'villagey atmosphere' and the poorly paid staff would not 'fit in' with the local people, we can assume these desperate refugees won't be housed in her neighbourhood.
(Emma Thompson hypocrisy here and here)

The appalling attitude displayed by Emma Thompson is not unique and seems to be prevalent among those who make the most noise about compassion toward immigrants and refugees. More often than not they live in exclusive areas that have not suffered the negative consequences of the mass immigration policies they advocate.

They preach incessantly about celebrating diversity, cultural enrichment, shared values and the benefits of living in a so called 'multi-cultural society' but they do it from oases of affluent, exclusively white communities far away from the desert of alien mono-cultural ghettos they have created.

The following is a solution to the problem of refugees and economic migration which I am sure all those that have had their communities and lives blighted by mass immigration will wholeheartedly endorse.

Direct all these Mediterranean immigrants and refugees firstly to other countries in the middle east that share their religion and who are wealthy and without conflict. Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait and Abu Dhabi to name but a few.

Secondly to those areas in Great Britain who's residents call for it or who vote for political parties that champion the benefits of mass immigration and multi-culturalism.

We can start with Emma Thompson's home town of West Hampstead in addition to the quiet haven of Dunoon, Scotland where her holiday residence is located.

David Cameron's constituency of Witney, Oxfordshire, which includes the charming, quintessentially English towns of Chipping Norton, Burford and Charlbury. The constituency boasts a population that is made up of 93% White British, 4.3% White Other, 1.4% Asian and only 0.4% Black. Hardly an advertisement for diversity or the boundless benefits of multi-culturalism.

Former Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg's constituency of Sheffield Hallam. Great Britain hater Clegg is one of the noisiest advocates for open border mass immigration along with the benefits of multi-culturalism and since his constituents repeatedly elect him to office they must concur. Sheffield Hallam is 89% White British, 3.1% White Other, 4% Asian and only 1% Black.

Like Clegg, the former Leader of the Labour Party, Red Ed Miliband is a Great Britain hating Marxist who doesn't believe that the British people should even have a say in membership of the EU.

His Doncaster North constituency does not mirror the diversity he imposes on others and is made up of 96% White British, 1.7% White Other, 0.8% Asian and a minuscule 0.4% Black.

One final example closer to home which re-enforces the point that the nosiest advocates for diversity, mass immigration and multi-culturalism sit idly by while someone else pays the price for their mindless voting behavior.

Aberavon on the South Wales coast holds the dubious honour of being the safest Labour seat in the country and in their collective stupidity recently elected the 'Red Prince' Stephen Kinnock as their Parliamentary representative. The son of notorious wealthy Welsh socialists Neil and Glenys Kinnock, Stephen has spent almost his entire life promoting global socialism on the coat tails of his parents careers in the British Parliament and the EU.

He has spent little time in Great Britain and none at all to speak of in the one party state of Aberavon. Stephen Kinnock and, by their votes, his constituents, support open border mass immigration which is easy to do when they don't suffer the consequences of their actions.

The advocates for diversity and multi-culturalsim live in a constituency made up of 96% White British, 1.3% White Other, 1.3% Asian and 0.3% Black.

In order to avoid the richly deserved accusations of hypocrisy the people of these constituencies, and the others who vote similarly, should open their towns and arms in welcome to the immigrants and refugees they have so far studiously avoided.

I am sure there will be no objections or complaints when the mosques and temples start going up in Witney, Chipping Norton, Burford, Charlbury, Sheffield Hallam, Doncaster North and Aberavon along with the Big Issue sellers and beggars that will appear on every street corner to enrich their lives.


Saturday, June 20, 2015

Michelle Obama's London Visit Was A Calculated Insult

Being America's first black/white mixed race President, Barack Obama was in an ideal position to heal the wounds of racial division not only in the United States but across the world. Tragically, he and his administration threw that opportunity away in order to exploit the latent racial animosity between communities and deepen the divisions as a means of imposing their 'progressive' ideology.

His own personal animosity toward Great Britain and it's people is palpable and this is supposedly driven by abuse metered out to his late father by the colonial administration in Kenya during colonial days.

Even the briefest investigation reveals that the only abuse meted out to Obama Senior was by Kenya's first President and dictator, Jomo Kenyatta, who prevented him from making a living on his return from the USA thus sending him over the edge into alcoholism.

Michelle Obama admitted that the first time in her life she was proud to be an American was after the election of her husband to the Presidency. If that was her sentiment toward her own country which has afforded her the opportunity to become rich beyond the dreams of millions of her compatriots and finally make it to the White House, then Great Britain has no chance of getting her respect.

Her latest jolly abroad, billed as a two day whistle stop tour to the UK to promote her girls education initiative, 'Let Girls Learn', consisted of a visit to a segregated girls school in the notoriously corrupt Bangladeshi ghetto of Tower Hamlets. Avoiding the possibility of meeting any real British people, her 'tour' also consisted of a visit to Prime Minister David Cameron at No 10 Downing Street and tea with Prince Harry at Kensington Palace.

Her speech to the pupils at the Mulberry Schools for Girls was not only an exercise in the Obama administrations deeply ingrained policy of victimology but also a calculated insult to the British people.

In view of her status as First Lady of the United States we can allow her a little licence to fabricate but her assertion that 'she sees herself when she looks out at all these young women' is dishonest in the extreme, while her claim that 'their story is her story' would suggest that she too was raised wearing a hijab in a male dominated Muslim ghetto or something similar.

This visit and the subsequent speech by Michelle Obama was a conscious attempt to portray Tower Hamlets as representative of Great Britain as a whole as well as portraying the inhabitants as disadvantaged by their skin colour and religious beliefs by an institutionally racist population.

The truth is that these girls are victimised and disadvantaged not by institutionalised British racism but by their own parents and their institutionally misogynistic anti-western Muslim community.

The people of this community had all the advantages of any other British citizen when they or their parents emigrated from Bangladesh. Instead they decided to ignore the advantages of freedom and individual liberty in an open society but went on to replicate the the country they left behind instead, warts and all.

The girls that Michelle Obama identifies with, and their parents, consider themselves to be Bangladeshi not British, they live their lives according to Bangladeshi culture and Islam while despising British culture and its way of life.

Unfortunately these girls will most likely end up married to an older relative from rural Bangladesh, confined inside the home with no rights whatsoever let alone women's rights. In a worst case scenario they may suffer genital mutilation or end up fulfilling their dreams like many other young 'British' schools girls by eloping to Syria in order to become jihadi brides for ISIS killers.

Michelle Obama could have made the effort to visit the outstanding Middle Rasen Primary School in rural Lincolnshire and offer her congratulations to the pupils and staff for their outstanding academic achievement. This school is an excellent example of what can be achieved when young people are not encumbered by 'progressives' with imposed 'multi-culturalism or Islam.

It's worth mentioning in passing that academic excellence is now frowned upon by the new breed of 'progressive' school inspectors and as a consequence the Middle Rasen Primary School has been denied the top award on account it is too English or not multi-cultural enough.
(Read the shocking story here)

Alternatively, Mrs Obama could have visited the schools used by her fellow 'progresssive' Tony Blair; the former Prime Minister of Great Britain who famously proclaimed that he "came to socialism via Marxism" who happened to be the person responsible for opening the borders to mass immigration from the undeveloped world including Bangladesh.

As a matter of ideological principle Blair opposed the private and selective education system in favour of the dumbed down state system whereby the all-must-have-prizes mentality has disastrously degraded education performance. Except for his own sons that is....after the proclamation by his Labour Party that they "didn't do God" Blair suddenly became a Roman Catholic in order that his sons could attend the much sought after, and selective, London Oratory faith school.

He could have practiced himself what he preached to the British people but obviously dumbed down schools are for the victims of socialism not its prophets.

Its worth noting in conclusion that Great Britain's most notorious race baiter, the Member of Parliament for  Hackney North and Stoke Newington, Dianne Abbot, is like Blair, a passionate campaigner against private education........except for her own son who attended the fee paying City of London School.

Dianne Abbot styles herself as Afro-Caribbean as opposed to British who's anti-white sentiments and rhetoric would make her a shoe-in for a Barack Obama advisor on race along with the Reverends Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson and Jeremiah Wright.

Great Britain under Blair, Brown and now Cameron has been fundamentally transformed for the worse and is now resembling a third world nation which is descending further into mediocrity with every year that passes.

Its disheartening to note that under the Obama administration, with Michelle in tow, the United States is going the same way and when it does the last hope for the world is extinguished. Lets hope and pray that the American people come to their senses and bring their political class to heel, something their trans-Atlantic cousins studiously failed to do.

Must read Richard Littlejohn column here.

Wednesday, June 17, 2015

200th Anniversary Of Waterloo Coincides With Ramadan - Who Cares?

As mentioned previously, in their attempts to impose 'multi-culturalism' on the British people, the political class and the establishment are actively distorting British history as well as discouraging overt celebrations of military victories to avoid giving offence to our historical European enemies.

It was doubly pleasing therefore to see HR the Prince of Wales along with the Duchess of Cornwall and the current Duke of Wellington overtly celebrating the two hundredth anniversary of the defeat of the French at Battle of Waterloo.

(To mark his epic victory, one prominent government Minister is reputed to have said in a citation that the Duke of Wellington "had saved civilisation from the French")

Because of their craven subservience to the European Union (EU) and their obvious discomfort at these celebrations it is also pleasing to know that there will be much anger and gnashing of teeth among the Europhile political establishment in Great Britain along with their masters in Brussels.

This same political establishment are not so coy about marking the start of the Muslim observance of Ramadan today whereby Great Britain's most indulged minority starve and dehydrate themselves between sunrise and sunset.

The British people are being asked not to eat or drink in front of a fasting Muslim out of respect while schools and workplaces are being asked to show flexibility in their requirements during the month.

The political establishment bleat on about the virtues of religious piety, observance and charitable giving during Ramadan while ignoring the fact that hundreds of their fellow countrymen and women are in Iraq and Syria showing none of the above. Instead they are displaying the exact opposite by raping, torturing, immolating and beheading men women and children in the name of Allah, under the orders of Mohammad (Peace Be Upon Him?) and as written in the Koran.

Great Britain's Muslim community - along with most other imported communities - have no interest whatsoever in British history or it's heritage or its way of life. In fact many openly despise all three and together with the British political establishment and the self loathing community are consciously working to bring about cultural and demographic replacement.

The British government, along with the establishment and the aforementioned self loathing community, are well aware that the vast majority of the indigenous British people have as much interest in Ramadan, Islam and Mohammad as Muslims have in Christmas, Easter and Jesus Christ.

It is safe to say that outside of natural curiosity and an acceptance that they exist as customs elsewhere, they have little or no interest in Diwali, Eid al Fitr, Yom Kippur, Chinese New Year Shiva, Buddha, Zoroaster, Guru Nanak either.

This doesn't stop the establishment and the politicised institutions from using political correctness, and the threat of prosecution for hate crimes, to silence any objections and to force acceptance of alien customs and practices no matter how barbaric onto an unwilling British populace.

As sure as death, taxes and political hypocrisy, David Cameron and the establishment will be falling over themselves in a months time to give their Eid Mubarak wishes to the disorientated Muslim community as they battle to get back into sync with their Circadian rhythms and the rest of the civilised world.

In the meantime as British documented Muslims celebrate Ramadan by starving and dehydrating themselves during the day, the real British will have celebrated, and will celebrate or mark in the near future, the eight hundredth anniversary of Magna Carta, the six hundredth anniversary of Agincourt, the two hundredth anniversary of Waterloo, the one hundredth anniversary of World War l,  the seventieth anniversary of Victory in Europe Day and the eighty ninth birthday of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II.

In most instances as opposed starving themselves the British will celebrate by drinking and eating, often in quantities that is detrimental to their good health. In order to carry on this a noble tradition I will be raising a glass or three today along with dinner to the Duke of Wellington and his men in honour of their glorious victory over the French and if that upsets or offends anyone be they French or Muslim, that will be too bad.

It is worth noting in conclusion that Ramadan is not without its risks for jihadis; in addition to starving and dehydrating themselves, Muslims are also required under threat of fines, flogging and even death, to refrain from lying, sexual relations, smoking and fighting during Ramadan. Refraining from these during the day for sub-human savages is a tough call indeed.


Watch this and weep/laugh. British Prime Minister David Cameron doing what he does best. Lying through his teeth.

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Rachel Dolezal - Joining Al Jolson Down The Swanee River

Just when you think that the 'progressive' left has reached the peak of their imbecility, along comes Rachel Dolezala white girl pretending to be black, to prove us all wrong. The behavior of this sad excuse for a human being has not just taken self loathing to a whole new level, she's taken it into the stratosphere.

Putting hilarity to one side it's worth looking at this issue in a little more detail in order to ascertain whether white people blacking up and pretending to be black people involves any wider implications.

I was aware of the 'white privilege' group of self loathers who believe that all white people are advantaged from birth due to their skin colour while ignoring widespread white poverty along with the fact that the highest offices in the USA have been occupied by black people. I was not aware however that there was a 'WrongSkin' affliction whereby some sad individuals who are white by birth and heritage identify themselves as black and therefore claim they are born in the wrong skin.

There is also the issue of legality, whereby due to the obsession with race and affirmative action in the USA, pretending to be from an ethnic minority or black can bear dividends. Many lucrative positions and scholarships are reserved for ethnic minorities and blacks where the qualifying requirements are sometimes relaxed in order to meet quotas.

It is asserted that Massachusetts Senator and possible Presidential candidate, Elizabeth Warren broke the law when she lied about her Native American heritage in order to secure a lucrative position at Harvard University on the basis of her minority status and being a person of colour.  Given the moniker 'Fauxcahontas' or 'Liawatha' her claim is based on a picture of her supposed great-great grandfather having high cheekbones and a cookbook with the demeaning title of Pow Wow Chow.

Despite being an absolute phony, Rachel Dolezal has secured a position as a part time professor for Africana Studies at Washington University in addition to a position as a civil rights activist with the National Association for the Advancement of Coloured People (NAACP). Although the organisation appears to have given her a green light, real black people are justifiably offended by her fakery.

The sad thing about this issue is the realisation of just how far the 'progressive' left have dragged America's reputation into the arena of wackiness and stupidity.

The Rachel Dolezal racial fakery, the obsession with sexuality and gender along with the global ballyhoo surrounding the fundamental transformation of Bruce Jenner into Caitlyn, the once respected United States of America has become the laughing stock of the world.

On a lighter side, the approval given by the NAACP to Rachel Dolezal adopting a black persona has afforded the world an opportunity to reverse some of the more risible aspects of political correctness and it can start with the rehabilitation of Al Jolson and other minstrels as part of Vaudeville and harmless light entertainment.

Nobody should be offended by a re-release of The Swanee Ribber with Rachel Dolezal's voice added to that of Al Jolson and in Great Britain re-runs of the immensely popular Black and White Minstrel Show can now be shown without causing offence.

Born-in-the-WrongSkin Michael Jackson, a sort of Al Jolson in reverse, certainly started something when he made colour change acceptable.

Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Deliberately Distorting History To Encourage Self Loathing And Decline

I was fortunate enough to be educated before the socialist/communist/progressive political class did away with the grammar school education system that provided an upward mobility opportunity for working class children. The replacement comprehensive system has systematically dumbed down education in order to achieve the perverted goal of equality of outcome in an egalitarian society.

Apart from the decline of maths, science and literary skills, the understanding of history has been particularly degraded with the result that pride in Great Britain and loyalty to the country can no longer be taken for granted. In fact, led by the government, along with the education establishment and the rest of the self loathing community, the opposite is true.

In their determination to fundamentally transform Great Britain into a so-called 'multi-cultural society' on behalf of the UN/EU, the political class and their agents are actively encouraging recent generations, particularly the young, the dumbed down and the gullible, to be ashamed of their history and their Judeo-Christian heritage.

Combined with the millions of economic migrants and their offspring who, apart from the welfare state and it's 'entitlements' have no interest whatsoever in Great Britain's history and heritage, it's no wonder the country is fast becoming a moral-free, third world mediocrity for the majority.

A recent to visit Buckland Abbey and Plymouth Hoe in Devonshire, England brought to life some of the history that was taught in schools which served to heighten ones sense of patriotism and loyalty to country that is sadly lacking among more recent generations and the immigrant communities.

Buckland Abbey was the residence of one of Great Britain's most famous historical characters, namely Sir Francis Drake, and Plymouth Hoe the site of one the many heroic episodes of his life i.e finishing his game of bowls after the Spanish Armada invasion force had been spotted in the English Channel off Plymouth Sound.

His exploits were enough to fire the imagination of every school boy let alone Queen Elizabeth I who knighted him for his victories over her mortal enemy, the Spanish.

His pillaging of treasure from Spanish galleons off the Spanish Main, his attack on Cadiz, known as 'singeing the kings beard', his circumnavigation of the world and his defeat of the Spanish Armada are legends of British history but are being increasingly portrayed as evidence of Great Britain's historical aggression.

History is brought up to date on Plymouth Hoe with the memorials not only commemorating Sir Francis Drake's defeat of the Spanish Armada in 1588 but to those who made the ultimate sacrifice for Great Britain in various campaigns from the Army, the Royal Air Force and the Royal Marines. The centrepiece is a huge and moving memorial to the those heroes who made the ultimate sacrifice while serving in the Royal Navy.

While acknowledging the anniversaries, not celebrating I might add, of historical victories such as the battles of Agincourt, Trafalgar or Waterloo, the British people are being asked to adopt a low profile and refrain from gloating for fear of offending the Spanish and French.

More recently, acknowledging the anniversaries of the defeat of Germany in both World Wars I and II the British people were asked to tone things down and not to be 'judgmental' while the EU bureaucrats refer to World War II as the 'European Civil War'. If this isn't distorting history for political ends I don't know what is.

Rumours abound that the British government are engineering, against the wishes of various peoples, the handover of Northern Ireland to the Eire, Gibraltar to the Spanish and the Falkland Islands to Argentina who have no historical or legitimate claim to the islands. These are supposedly acts of contrition for perceived historical wrongs ordered by the 'progressive' global elite that run the UN/EU bureaucracies.

If any of this sounds familiar to our American cousins then their instincts are correct. They are undergoing a similar exercise by their 'progressive' elite to distort history for political ends.

Located adjacent to Plymouth Hoe are the Mayflower Steps where the Pilgrim Fathers finally set forth on their epic voyage to start a new life in America, free from religious oppression and to preserve their English culture which was being gradually eroded by their exile in the Netherlands.

As every school kid knows this was the beginning of the United States of America which went on to become a country conceived in individual liberty and which eventually became the most prosperous country in history.

The natives tribes did indeed lose out as civilisation advanced but one has to accept that if it wasn't the Europeans that settled the land it would have been the Chinese, the Japanese or latterly the Russians. Either way the natives would not have been left to carry on with their way of life in an unpopulated land brimming with unexploited natural resources.

Abroad, one of the first acts of the newly inaugurated President Obama was to undertake his famous apology tour where he portrayed his country as the historical bad guys and force for evil in the world ignoring the sacrifices made by her sons and daughters for other peoples freedom.

The erasing of America's Judeo-Christian heritage is continuing apace while the self loathing being taught in schools and on campuses across the country has reached new heights of ridiculousness by the incessant promotion of white guilt and supposed white privilege.

It would appear that the 'progressive' leadership won't consider its mission accomplished until the United States is another European type morality free mediocrity governed by the similar remote wealthy elite that has reduced Great Britain and Europe to sad state they are in today.

Monday, June 8, 2015

The Human Rights Industry - Rewarding The Guilty, Punishing The Innocent

It is now accepted as fact that every thought, word and deed of the modern political class is meticulously calculated to further their ideological agenda as opposed to ensuring the security and prosperity of their citizens.

On the contrary, in many cases this well-being is negatively affected as they impose their ideologically driven agenda on their distracted citizens.

The cynical use of universal human rights to further their agenda is one such issue that is exposed under even the most superficial scrutiny.

The idea that the 'progressive' global political elite along with the career bureaucrats of the UN/EU actually care about the condition of billions of people around the world is as preposterous as it is false. Only these elitists could justify imposing strict human rights requirements on the free democracies of the developed world while sucking up to, and doing lucrative business with the planet's most tyrannical totalitarian dictators.

The incorporation of European human rights laws into British law in 1998 by the Blair government is a classic example of agenda driven politicians cynically using historical horrors such as National Socialism and the Holocaust to progress the EU superstate agenda while amassing personal fortunes in the process.

The Council of Europe instituted the European Convention On Human Rights (ECHR) in 1953 in the aftermath of World War II with the intention of preventing the rise of regimes such as the Third Reich. But like all well intentioned projects it has been seized upon by an unscrupulous political class and used as a tool impose the EU agenda.

Great Britain was already a signatory to the ECHR and showing no signs of developing into a Nazi regime when the Convention laws were incorporated into British law. Despite the British having a centuries long history of developing liberties and individual freedoms this incorporation was solely designed to achieve the supremacy of EU law over British law - the supremacy of unelected EU bureaucrats over British judges and elected Parliamentarians.

Traditional British liberty and individual freedoms didn't begin in 1998 but began to coalesce as far back as 893AD when King Alfred the Great began codifying English laws. With a few ups and downs in between, it culminated in the signing of the Magna Carta in 1215. This was amended and modified over the centuries resulting in the Habeas Corpus Act of 1679, Bill of Rights of 1689, the Act of Settlement of 1701.

These documents are accepted to be the inspiration behind the founding documents of the United States of America, namely the Declaration of Independence, The Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Without a shadow of doubt the incorporation of the ECHR into British law has been an unmitigated disaster for the British people and a boon for every foreign terrorist, murderer, rapist and violent criminal that makes it onto the British mainland in addition to being a money maker for the human rights industry; an industry stuffed with money grubbing lawyers that has grown out of all proportion to any actual demand from the British people.

It is worth noting at this point that Matrix Chambers was set up by Cherie Blair, wife of then Prime Minister Tony Blair, in April 2000 in order to cash in on this new human rights industry which exploded onto the scene in the aftermath of the ECHR incorporation.

Any attempt by the British Home Secretary to deport the above mentioned foreign terrorists, murderers, rapists and thousands of violent criminals are thwarted by the politically motivated bureaucrats that sit in judgement in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France.

Furthermore they often award thousands of pounds of taxpayer money in 'compensation' if these dangerous criminals are not released onto the streets while awaiting judgement.

By his actions Tony Blair has demonstrated that he has no concern for human rights whatsoever; a venal operator who cynically used the issue to impose his Europhile agenda and make a personal fortune in the process. Since he incorporated ECHR into British law he has bombed and otherwise been instrumental in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians during the course of his illegal war. He has lucrative dealings with blood-soaked tyrants from the former Soviet republics as well as having had cordial relations with Colonel 'Mad Dog' Qaddafi of Libya.

While the UN/EU bureaucrats take the bastions of individual liberty such as Great Britain, America and Israel to task for supposed human rights abuses, they refuse to give equal concern to the serial human rights abusers of China, the decades long dictatorships of Africa, the Muslim tyrannies of the Middle East along with the socialist/communist dystopias of Central and South America.

As previously noted, human rights in Great Britain only apply to foreign terrorists and criminals who are trying to avoid deportation, they don't apply to the tens of thousands of under age white girls who were systematically groomed then raped and pimped out by Muslim paedophile gangs with the tacit approval of the government and it agents.

They don't apply to law abiding citizens who innocently go about their business and end up dead or victims of violent career criminal gangs who were allowed entry into the country unchecked and cannot be removed because of their 'human rights'.

In the run-up to recent election Prime Minister Cameron promised to correct this abomination but as ECHR is a requirement of EU membership and he remains committed to the United States of Europe the British people will continue to be denied their human rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.


Tuesday, June 2, 2015

Engineering England's Fall - The Enemy Within

It's a worthwhile exercise to occasionally leave familiar territory to ascertain whether certain areas of the country are as one perceives them to be in order to confirm that ones interpretation of current affairs are based on reality as opposed to unjustified prejudices.

With this in mind I found myself far from home standing before the alter in a church dedicated to St. Thomas of Canterbury in a small village in the county of Devonshire, South West England.

The village is quintessentially rural England where history seeps from every stone and where every stained glass window in the ancient church tells a story. The site has been a place of worship since Saxon times where the base of the original Saxon cross can be found in the graveyard behind the war memorial.

The reason why this tiny church is relevant today is not only because it remains an active place of worship and facilitates the continuation of the ancient tradition of bell ringing, it's construction and dedication is due to one of the most notable episodes in English history. The murder of the then Archbishop of Canterbury, Thomas Becket, in 1170 by knights loyal to King Henry II. They carried out their dastardly act under the false impression King Henry actually wanted to be rid of "this troublesome priest" on a permanent basis.

It is this long embedded history and tradition which will eventually attract the attention of the metropolitan 'progressive' elite and put the English identity of this village in serious jeopardy.

Current events and the actions of the British establishment have proved beyond the shadow of doubt that they are totally committed to replacing England's culture and way of life with a so called 'multi-cultural society' and to this end they have packed Great Britain's institutions and the machinery of state with like minded agents equally committed to England's fall.

Evidence of this ongoing treachery abounds but one recent incident should be enough to convince even the most sceptical of readers of its veracity.

When government inspectors descended upon Market Rason Primary School in rural Lincolnshire they refused to award the top grade despite the high academic achievement because the school was too English or not 'multi-cultural' enough. (Read the appalling story here and here)

The fact that the catchment area is ninety seven percent 'White English' didn't appear to be relevant in their assessment but it speaks volumes about the animosity toward traditional England and the English way of life by these government agents.

When one takes into account that every government department, including the civil service and every institution from the NHS to the BBC, the police, the judiciary, the unions, the quangocracy, the EU and the UN are all stuffed to the rafters with committed 'multi-culturalists' like these school inspectors, what chance has a small village in rural Devonshire got to preserve its way of life?

This replacing of one historic culture and way of life with another in order to achieve political ends is referred to as"un-homogenising" by the global 'progressive' elite who use the United Nations and the European Union as vehicles for their perverted agenda. Anywhere else on the planet its referred to as ethnic cleansing but I digress.

Appointed Special Envoy for Migration, career super bureaucrat Peter Sutherland openly advocates the EU "undermining national homogeneity" as matter of progress but as is normal practice among the unelected global 'progressive' elite the various people's affected are not allowed a say in this cultural upheaval let alone a vote.

Peter Sutherland and his fellow elitists have the mental ability to completely ignore the horrors visited upon hundreds of villages, towns and cities by open border mass immigration.

The rape of tens of thousands of underage white girls by Muslim paedophile gangs, people smuggling and violent street crime by East European criminal gangs, sex slavery and drug related turf wars on the streets of England and all the other negative aspects of mass immigration don't warrant a mention by the likes of Peter Sutherland and his fellow agenda driven bureaucrats.

Imposing 'multi-culturalism' on people who didn't ask for it and don't want it appears to be their life's ambition while ignoring the wishes of the people who's ancient way of life is under threat like never before.