Terrorists View Media as Marketing Tool

50 dead and 50 injured after white nationalist terror attack in New Zealand. They attacked two mosques with automatic weapons and slaughtered the crowd ruthlessly.

It’s hard to imagine that horror but also what the victims loved ones must be feeling. Terrible. The tragedy is extended when certain media, in practice, do exactly what the terrorists want.

One of the perpetrators wrote a manifesto. He clearly states his goal is to accelerate a race war, and one tool to achieve that is the mainstream-media. These neo-nazis literally rely on the medias polarizing tendencies to create resentment amongst social groups.

The perpetrator makes it clear he could’ve used a variety of ways to hurt large crowds of people, but decided specifically for automatic weapons “in order to further the social, cultural, political and racial divide within the United states”. This alleges to the heated debate on gun control in America, and worth noting is New Zealand has almost no gun control at the time.

Thus it’s safe to assume this is why he mentioned PewDiePie, because he knew what leftist-media narration would do to the right-wings trust for the establishment.

The fact that several media figures are playing along with the terrorists stated intention is embarrassing, and so obviously sickening to ordinary people that it may well bury their trust for the media long-term. On social media, criticism is huge and not many appreciate this.

However, it raises a bigger problem with media sensationalism. Journalists often mention mass murderers by name, and attention is given to their manifesto. This provides low-functioning psychopaths with the opportunity to use the media as a viral marketing tool.

The murderer’s manifesto predicted the establishment’s reactions, behaviors and narratives. Both the left and the right should therefore agree that media are the ones fueling social instability.

A news editor in Sweden went out immediately and warned that similar mass murders can happen here. He further explains how “terrorism is enshrouded in good-looking memes and share-friendly Facebook rants”, suggesting politicians should now censor the internet.

In essence: More authoritarian government. Less freedom. More surveillance. Less ugly words. More filters. Less ugly emotions. Smaller thought. Would this really create less polarization and violence? Or more?

Maybe it’s just as simple as this: You people don’t get the internet.

Therefore you desperately cling to power by throwing feces on everyone else, to create the illusion that you’re not the problem. The human world can now say it has a social media terrorist troll. This speaks volumes on the elites inability to adapt to the emerging information society.

Instead of censoring law-abiding citizens, I suggest we focus on the people who lost their lives. And reject the polarization mentality that leads to these kinds of tragedies. There’s enough bad ideas in the world, we need more good ones.

Rest in peace.




Migration activist about her refugee child: “Boy or man? Lover or son?”

Swedish migration activist talks about her refugee child. She is conflicted. Boy, or man? Lover, or son?

Here’s a direct translation of what Lina tells the newspaper: “I can’t answer whether I love him or not, because I don’t know. It’s a position of dependence. But we’ve gotten to know each other and we have a tight relationship. We’ve quarreled, cried and discussed. Sometimes I don’t know what we’re doing. Is it my son, my best friend or an adult male?”

“Sometimes Omid asks me why I don’t see a man, but as it is right now I can’t meet a man. I’m afraid to have a relationship. What if we start something and then something else happens and we have a falling out. That uncertainty? Love is terrible and I can NEVER take risks. Maybe if I would meet someone who’s an activist within our refugee network, but that’s not likely. I’m an ordinary girl and I do normal things. It’s just that I’ve chosen to hide someone.”

“He tells me he’s never going to leave me. That he isn’t like a Swedish child. Well, then he is a child. He tells me he’s always going to be there for me because I’m going to need him. That he’s never going to forget. I won’t ever forget either.”



This reminds me of that other “activist” who described sleeping in the same bed as the refugee she took in. And when she contacted her friend because she felt guilty about it, the friend replied: “It’s okay. We all do it. The most important thing you can do right now is to give him intimacy and make him feel secure.”

The story of the tye-dye-witches and “refugee children” is the biggest political fraud in modern Swedish history.

Adult migrants pretend to be children, and are imported to satisfy middle-aged women. It’s costing the taxpayers so much that public institutions like hospitals and the police force can’t function properly. And yet NOT A SINGLE JOURNALIST in Sweden has covered this story.

The closest we get to a report on this is that video I did a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sass4jgyEUY

It’s nothing short of a scandal. How can the journalist elite of Sweden leave the reality-reporting over to an dude on YouTube?

And then they wonder why people don’t trust the media.

Sweden’s Government Isn’t Entirely Honest
































































What the? What did I just read?








Sweden’s immigration policy isn’t about humanitarianism. It’s about the economy.





Angry Foreigner

#LastNightInSweden – Armed Robbery with Kalashnikovs

Here’s a question to all of you who mocked Donald Trump, because “nothing happened” on the 17th of February – which was referred to as #LastNightInSweden.

Did you miss that a gold-store got robbed by three men wielding kalashnikovs? They rammed a car into the store and pulled out automatic weapons, it looked like a scene from GTA for christ sake.



But since it happened in a immigrant-dominated ghetto, people don’t care.

Here’s a list of incidents that have occured in Malmö this year alone.

12th of February: A man in his 20’s shot in the head outside of a restaurant on Möllevångstorget. Nobody arrested.

8th of February: A janitor shoveling snow got shot in a residential area. He still has life-threatening injuries. A 15-year old got arrested.

21th of January: 18-year old man shot multiple times and injured severely. The fact that he carried a bulletproof vest probably saved his life. No suspect arrested.

12th of January: 16-year old boy shot to death at bus-stop in Rosengård, he died immediately. No suspects arrested.

3rd of January: Man deceased after shooting in Fosie.

It’s incomprehensably ridiculous that the media would get hooked up on a specific date, and use that to mock Trump, when the surrounding days are insane. Just a few days after Trumps statement a violent riot occured in the notorious ghetto Rinkeby.

7-8 cars were set on fire, police were showered with rocks, and a shop owner was beaten up when he interrupted an attempted robbery in his store.

The eye witness who recorded the video above had the following to say to alt-media blog Avpixlat: “I saw how the cops didn’t enter the square. They just waited for a long time while 30-50 arabs and negroes were smashing windows. Then they went into Lidl and stole beer and energy drinks. They were given free reign for an hour and the cops did nothing, they came in first after the lootings were over. I tried to record but then three adult arabs came up to me and wondered if I was a cop, or what the hell a swede is doing here. I said I wasn’t a swede but then I got to run. They seemed to hate me because I was the only “whitey” around.”

It’s entirely possible to be a critic of Trump, and still pay attention to facts and accurate depictions of reality. What the media is doing is childish and undermines serious problems Sweden is facing, in which immigrants themselves often make out the biggest victims. Because guess whose primarily living in these rough neighborhoods?

We can not change the negatives if we do not highlight the negatives.

Migrants raped woman in wheelchair – Swedes have had enough


On the 6th of October the police sent extra units to Gotland in order to calm down furious Swedes, after a woman in a wheelchair was gangraped by 5 asylum seekers. The woman reportedly “broke down” after the horrible ordeal.

On the 5th of October cirka 100 people demonstrated in support of the woman. According to one of the demonstrators all of Gotland is currently in shock and many people are crying.

In another seperate incident earler that day, an activist from the national-socialist Nordic Resistance Movement went to the address where the woman was reportedly gangraped, and confronted 3 immigrant males who have been pointed out as suspects. In this videoclip they admit that they’ve been at the police station, but that they were released. Eventually the man lost his temper and shouted: “You are fucking scum! Leave this fucking country you filthy animals!”

Since that day the situation has supposedly escalated, and now special units are being sent there to deal with the locals. So the establishment are spending more resources keeping angry swedes in check, than they do locking away rape suspects from the rest of society.

The 5 men were detained at first but were released on Wednesday. According to the prosecutor the allegations don’t stick since the woman didn’t fight back enough. But of course she didn’t, because she’s in a wheelchair, she CAN’T fight back.

Her lawyer had this to say to Nyheter Idag: “Unfortunately victims of crime will find themselves in a worse position if they didn’t shout, scream, fight, scratch or bite. And partly because of her handicap she isn’t physically strong enough and mobile enough to have been able to escape.”

The men however claim that she wanted to have sex with complete strangers in a bathroom for several hours on end. And apparently the prosecutor chooses to believe this.

So it should come as no surprise that several locals in Gotland got pissed and issued threats towards the prosecutor, investigator, policemen and the suspects. The prosecutor got a “nightly visit” from someone, and the suspects aren’t even in Gotland anymore because of the threat against them. Which technically means they’re free to go somewhere else in Sweden and rape again.

And yet the establishment gets surprised at the anger. The media of Gotland is full of debate articles warning about racism, talking about how people need to calm down, and that Swedish men rape too. A collection can be found below.

This guy worries about racism.

The politicans say that “we need reasonable citizens now”.

This guy is talking about the influence of porn.

The police chief talks about “hate and ignorance”.

This guys draws comparisons to Nazi Germany and says that’s where we’re heading.

Swedish public service media along with “antiracist” organization Expo labels the demonstrators as nazis, or at least “ignorant people who are useful idiots to nazis”.

When the demonstration actually consisted of just plain ordinary people. The elderly, men, women, children, even immigrants. You could see strollers in the crowd of people, for christ sake.

Personally I think it’s about time Swedes get pissed off and speak up against their politicians. A demonstration is good. Everything is better than just sitting at home and being frustrated over the internet.

All our politicans have done thus far is to spit ordinary human beings in the face. They steal the peoples tax money, the result of a life’s hard work, and use it to implement policies that benefit everyone other than the people themselves. Then they call the taxpayers racists because they feel worried that hospitals don’t have enough room for people who need surgery, our senior citizens are living just a tad above street beggars in quality, and bathhouses and music festivals have suddenly become unsafe places for women.

Why should Swedish citizens behave better than Swedish politicans? That the politicans aren’t considered criminals is just a matter of how you want to define things. Their actions are certainly immoral at least, to the highest degree.

It’s not right to take the law into your own hands. That’s why politicans should listen to ordinary people instead of treating them like this. They’ve treated us like shit for far too long now.

On the upside, there is one piece of good news. Kinda.

This is from before the gangrape. The government is currently investigating sharpening up the rape legislation and adding more emphasis on consent, as well as a wording about severe negligence. According to the attorney of the woman in a wheelchair, a change to the legislation such as this would have helped her case if it was already in effect. He would’ve been able to have them detained in police custody and prosecuted.

He says that rape victims who don’t fight back very boldly are disadvantaged in court. The woman clearly said no to each new male who took turns with her, but yet that wasn’t enough. Even though she got injuries that have been documented.

According to him it should be enough: “Research shows that it’s not entirely uncommon that girls become paralyzed and shocked in situations like this, because they’re afraid of being hurt. My client wound up in that category, she became paralyzed. Eventually she gave up on the situation and aimed at just getting out of there alive.”

I agree with him. Swedish law, as it is right now, puts absurd demands on women. You basically have to beat up the perpetrator in order to be able to claim rape, physical resistance is necessary. This despite the fact that the most common reaction is freezing up.

Men are bigger and stronger than women, generally. Their bodies are weapons in their own right, and women are conscious of this. Expecting a frightened woman in a vulnerable position to smack a guy across the jaw, when he hasn’t shown any respect for her boundaries yet, is blatant idiocy. Why would she wanna give him an excuse to hurt her even more?

It’s not at all strange if someone becomes paralyzed in a situation like that. Ultimately it is men who have a special responsibility to be perceptive, not to just go “oh yay free pussy as long as she doesn’t shout loud”.

The new legislation that’s being investigated takes consideration to what reality actually looks like, and the part about “severe negligence” is especially important. It means someone could be convicted of rape without having intent, or premeditation. And the way it’s been the past years is that perpetrators have been able to get off just by claiming that “I thought she wanted it”, even when the girl has said no and the evidence spoke to her favor. But the intent couldn’t be proven.

Of course the rapist doesn’t have intent. Anybody who’s well-read on rapists knows that they rarely view what they do as rape: https://youtu.be/uvUSKkahl3M

They have zero self-distance. Usually they hate rapists as much as everybody else, and they don’t see themselves as rapists. If they happen to get convicted the best answer they can come up with when asked what happened, is “it just happened”. And if they complete therapy then suicide attempts are common, when they gain insight and truly realize what it is they’ve done.

Today the court focuses too much on whether the perpetrator understood or not. With a wording of negligence in the picture you’d be able to focus on the situation at hand, instead of the perpetrators personal view on sex.

What does “blatte” mean? Exploring Sweden’s ghetto culture

My artist name in English is “Angry Foreigner”. In Swedish it’s “En Arg Blatte Talar” which means An Angry Blatte Speaking. Blatte and foreigner don’t carry the same meaning, and when my channel became international I decided to go with something simple because a lot of people in Sweden didn’t understand the sarcasm/satire of my Swedish artist name. Allow me to explain.

“Blatte” for immigrant is what “nigga” is for black people. Chris Rock explained this perfectly.

Back in the 90’s “blatte” was widely acknowledged as an invective. It’s an insulting term meant to describe immigrants who live up to a bad stereotype; rowdy, noisy and refuse to learn the Swedish language because they think it’s cool to be a “gangsta”. Put simply it’s someone who takes pride in not being integrated.

They call female strangers “Swede-whores” and rob Swedish men because it makes them feel cool, not because they need the money to survive. There’s been a few interviews describing how the reason for their mugging is that they want money for partying and fancy brand clothing. Not for food or housing. In other words, it should be impossible for leftists to defend these materialistic reactionary  shitheads, but they still manage in some way.

Blattar will look at Swedish men and find them pathetic because they are civilized human beings who don’t immediately resort to violence to solve verbal conflicts. Blattar will look at Swedish girls and think that they are cheap whores, because they subscribe to Western morality. In other words: Swedish girls dare to have sex before marriage, wear clothing that shows skin and enjoy sex, so because of  this they have less value and are more or less okay to rape. And no, Im not exaggerating. Read the hyperlinks.

Put simply, “blatte” started out as a slur for immigrants who behave badly. But in recent years it has become diluted, normalized and synonymous with the word “immigrant”. So when I made my very first video in Swedish a lot of people misunderstood what I was saying. They thought I was spewing hatred towards immigrants in general, when in fact I was only speaking ill of the immigrants who insist on being stereotypical self-destructive feces.

And let me be really fucking clear on this: As an immigrant I take offense to this minority of disgusting morons making the majority of us look bad.

Do not for a second underestimate the destruction a single pack of these animals can cause. The identity of the blatte is founded upon personal insecurities combined with an exaggerated feeling of cockyness. Blattar seek out physical altercations to assert their dominance, and you can never tell a blatte he’s done something wrong without him exploding and talking about “yo mamas pussy”.

This creature completely lacks self-distance and feels the entire world owes them something. They will constantly demand respect, simply for their mere existence, while not showing anyone even the most basic respect. This is an example of ordinary daily behavior for a blatte,

Blatte: Eyyy you swedish whore, suck me dick, how much u cost?

Girl: You’re a disgusting idiot.


To call passing female strangers whores, and seek out fights over trivialities like someone looking at you for more than 4 seconds, is an everyday routine for this animal. Blattar is one of the reasons why racism is created, because repeated meetings with these singular individuals easily create hatred and prejudice.

It doesn’t matter that 90% of immigrants are decent human beings who don’t commit any crimes. You’re not going to notice them, because they don’t affect your life. They’re normal people. A pack of blattar however will affect you severely, because it’s in the nature of humans to focus on negative experiences more than positive ones. Thus, just having a few encounters with these animals will contribute to someone becoming racist. Whether they want to or not their brain is going to create negative associations to non-Swedes.


Why do these type of people exist?

To summarize, Sweden’s immigration policy is about taking in way more immigrants than you can handle, and sticking them all into segregated housing areas, IE ghettos. Sweden being a humanitarian nation is the biggest scam about this country because our politicians couldn’t give a shit less about immigrants. They actively choose to live as far from immigrants as possible.

The result of Sweden’s irresponsible immigration policy is segregation. In the beginning of the 90’s there were 3 ghettos in all of Sweden. Today there’s approximately 186. When you take a shitload of immigrants and let them live together without the presence of any Swedes two things will happen.

1. There is no integration. You’re growing up in an area where you don’t even need to learn Swedish, because you are not surrounded by Swedes. You are surrounded by your countrymen. And thus you will not adapt, because there is no social incentive to do such.

2. A feeling of isolation is born. And in this social vacuum resentment and suspicion will start growing. This article by two politicians from the People Party says it all. They went to schools in some of these areas where ethnic Swedes make out a minority, and talked to the students there. Allow me to translate a few paragraphs.

-“What’s the worst thing you could be called?”
– “A SWEDE!”
The group of immigrants all screamed at once. The few ethnic Swedish youths in the corner of the room didn’t even take notice. This is their everyday life in the Swedish ghettos: Swede-whore, Swede-fag, peasant, Swede-racist, and fucking Swede. Words they hear on a daily basis. Almost every time it’s the same situation when we visit these ghetto schools in Sweden. Students openly display their contempt for what they consider Swedish.

Many youths in these areas don’t feel any connection to Swedishness, but equate it to being cold-hearted and wussy, something you wanna distance yourself from. There’s also an attitude about how female Swedishness is the same as being a tramp with no morals. If an immigrant girl stands up for her rights and lives as freely as guys she is viewed as “Swedeified” by many, which is considered horrendous.”

Both the political Left and Right in Sweden seems to think that the solution to these problems is building more apartments and giving immigrants jobs that don’t exist yet. But if you build more housing it’s going to be primarily immigrants who move there and then we have yet another exclusion area. None of the political parties (except for the Sweden Democrats) want to admit that integration can only work if immigrants are mixed with Swedes, and in order for that to happen you can’t maintain high immigration for years on end.

Take a look at this chart below. It shows the number of car fires and how they’ve increased over the years. Nuff said.


And if you ask me, this situation is also the result of the disgusting rhetoric by the political Left. They constantly talk about “structural racism” in Sweden and act as if this country is so horribly racist that you don’t even stand a chance.

I’ve come across numerous immigrants who honestly said that they don’t see the point in working hard and studying, because “it doesn’t pay off if you’re an immigrant”. The regressive left is destroying the spirits of immigrants in Sweden, making them feel more excluded and turning them against Swedish people.

Can a Swede be a blatte?

A blatte is an immigrant who thinks he’s a gangbanger from Compton. This foreigner comes from, for example, Iraq – lives in Sweden – yet gets his identity from ghetto culture in America. And then he has the nerve to insult assimilated immigrants for having an identity crisis and being “swedified”.

The blatte wrongfully belives he can related to negroes living in Compton, listens way too much to gangsta rap, and watches Scarface way too many times, to the point where he starts idolizing criminality and materialism. Blattar think that the coolest thing you can do is to treat other people like shit, because being kind and responsible is considered to be weakness.

Being a blatte is more about behavior than ethnicity. Blatte simply refers to a person that’s non-Swedish or non-white and acts like a gangsta stereotype. Thus the person can be Arab of African, but also Bosnian or Italian. It is possible for white Swedes to be blattar as well but in that case it’s more appropriate to call them “wannabe-blattar” since we’re talking about a ethnic Swede pretending to be an immigrant pretending to be a gangsta nigga from America.

So why did you choose to call yourself “blatte” as an artist-name?

Because it’s ironic. It’s satire. It’s meant to ridicule immigrants who take pride in stupidity and degenerate behavior.

When you grow up as an immigrant in Sweden you’re aware of other peoples expectations of you. There is a clear perception of what immigrants are “supposed” to be, and if you defy those expectations other immigrants will call you a “swedefied faggot” and a race traitor. You know how many times I’ve been told Im not a “real Bosnian” simply because I listen to satanic metal?

The purpose of my artist name is to mock and destroy peoples perceptions of what an immigrant is “supposed” to be.

“Immigrant” is not a fucking identity, it’s simply something that you do; relocate to a different country. Yet it’s typical for immigrants to associate values and behavior to that label. There’s an idea in society of what an immigrant is supposed to look like, act, and think, and immigrants themselves are the ones upholding this stereotype as if it’s a legitimate identity.

I’ve seen immigrants pretend to have an accent they don’t even have. I’ve seen them pretend to be shittier at speaking Swedish than they really are, just so they appear to be more “immigrant”. I’ve seen people create their sense of self in the conflict of Swedish VS Non-Swedish. It is absolutely pathetic. Be yourself and fuck whatever cultural prison someone else is trying to lock you into.

My artist name is a mockery of the destructive blatte-culture whose morality includes hating police, common sense and decent behavior. I’ve heard of immigrants who’ve been mocked by other immigrants because they try getting good grades in school and learn to speak Swedish properly. Are you seriously gonna tell me that’s not a huge problem?

As an immigrant I feel provoked by what this blatte-culture entails because I do not buy the notion that all immigrants need to be stupid violent macho-caricatures. Do not try to lock me into a box where I am not allowed to explore my own thoughts and feelings. You might expect feminists and leftists to wanna take this fight alongside me, but instead they’re telling me Im the problem.

Immigrants are not a homogenous group. Immigrants can come from all corners of the world. A white American is as much of an immigrant as a black Somalian. Just because you’re born in a different country doesn’t mean you have to be a complete dumbass.

But considering how many people didn’t understand the blatant irony in “En Arg BLATTE talar” I decided to go with something simple when I turned to an English audience. So that’s why I chose to call myself the Angry Foreigner, because it can’t be misinterpreted as wildly.

Perhaps I thought too well of humans when I assumed they’d be able to read between the lines.

Horrible tale from inside a Swedish ghetto


This is a comment that a Swede left on my video about the horror of being gay in Sweden’s muslims ghettos. I thought it was worth posting because it’s well-written and nuanced, with insight that I rarely see in the debate about immigration and regressive cultural values.

Here it goes.

“Most of the people commenting this video are living outside of these ghettos. People haven’t lived where radical Islam is the norm. Where riots have occurred. Where you can’t see a lot of the people’s faces. Another thing I find funny is that always on the news and in comments sections they think the cars that burn are selected by random. They’re not. They’re messages.

I live in one of the so called ghettos. It is a challenge but I am having it easy because I am a very big dude and I’m considered pretty normal. I thought I’d just show you some perspective from someone actually living in one of the “danger zones”.

First of all there are sub zones within the media’s perspective of the danger zones. In Biskopsgården there are places that clearly is outright dangerous to even be in while some are quite nice with a view over the danger zone.

The funny thing is that Biskopsgården is really beautifully located with a lake and football fields. It is really beautiful. We also have to make it clear to whom it is a danger zone. The entire area in Biskopsgården is a danger zone to the police and LGBT people but to most normal males you won’t really notice much if you aren’t a very frightened person like most Sweden Democrats that would shit themselves if a man with a turban walked on the sidewalk with them. I will make a danger list at the end of this post for y’all really scared people. If you’re like that then you’d have a heart attack looking at the danger zone.

I live in the part with the view of the local danger zone and there are quite a lot of shady people in the danger zone. With the local danger zone I mean it would even be risky for me to walk in there without a translator because drugs build up a certain parameter in that area and ask the wrong questions and you are really playing with fire. You don’t even have to try to find them. They are obvious and have a special way they move among people. You also see all the drug delivery vehicles (moped and such) and they don’t even try to hide the scent of cannabis.

Many of my friends are actually immigrants because almost everyone here is. My friends are from different places and the most liberal of them are from richer families from Iran and the most radical have rich family roots in Saudi Arabia and even he thinks that his culture’s view on women is a disgrace to all human beings and that they have too much influence on the Muslim community that is harming the faith. True, they cannot represent all the immigrants from Iran and Saudi Arabia but I’m just saying they are pretty sane Muslims.

When we walk around they usually translate to me what is going on because quite frankly Swedish is not even a language within close proximity of the danger zone. My friends know Persian, Arabic, German and Swedish so I get a whole new perspective of what’s going on when they translate to me in German because no other Muslims in the area know German so they don’t expect anything. We use German just to be sure. The funny thing is though that just like some Swedes look funny upon people talking Arabic on the tram when they don’t understand we get a lot of funny looks and sometimes even comments in Arabic when we are using German.

The main problem here is how much influence this danger zone gets on the surroundings. Muslims further away from the danger zone would be considered a lot more normal while the closer you get to the epicenter you have ISIS within those walls. I’m not even kidding, ISIS is right there and most of us could point them out and according to rumors SÄPO do have the building under supervision. To be able to talk you’d have to grow the biggest balls ever seen and be willing to move as soon as you spill it out.

The problem is that the amount of fear that the epicenter emits makes a lot of the Muslims around feel threatened and like they’re bad Muslims. One of my friend’s mother who lives closer to the epicenter has told me that she is more scared in her home in Sweden than she ever was in Iran, because in Iran she would at least live with her kind of Muslims and the Swedish immigration board don’t seem to understand the difference.

One of her relatives had to live with people that had physically abused a woman in Iran who was her friend, and she tried to bring up that she feared for her life and that the men looked at her as if she was prey. Now they shared the same camp and she was scared to death while she was waiting to gain access to the Swedish system.

Anyway, my friend’s mother has to live in fear due to her being a woman and not having much of an education. We don’t have anything to offer these women in Sweden and hence they become even more victimized and she told me that many of her friends rely on their men to bring home income, which makes the radical ideas keep on prospering because women don’t have a voice and say if they want to survive. There are simply no homes for either Swedes or immigrants who don’t feel safe in their own home so my friend’s mom is going to live her entire life in fear and die in fear if she don’t find the money to move back to Iran. Now if that isn’t the most heartbreaking thing you’ve heard in a long time you have a pretty shitty life my friend.

She says that it is an unfair amount of pressure on her to live right by the Quran while a lot of men can get away with a lot of things you shouldn’t do according to the more radical in the bunch. She is under more pressure to live right than she ever was in Iran. She has wanted to become a feminist and join a union and that was something she was looking forward to in Sweden but she wouldn’t feel safe doing that even though such a union is made for people to feel safe.

You can even see that even though Swedes can’t say that females in this area are actually one of the entire WORLDS most oppressed women that a lot of agencies understand that they have to do something. Almost everywhere you see signs of phone numbers to female support groups and hotlines for domestic abuse. On buses, bus stops, road signs etc. I have even taken a picture of a sign from Amnesty right in that neighborhood addressing the oppression of women. Dude, a sign from Amnesty in Sweden. So it is realized in some sense but we aren’t doing enough and taking proper responsibility since they still live in fear.

The closer I get to the epicenter the more you will hear of the topic that the angry foreigner is talking about. It doesn’t seem to be linked to a gender so at least there’s some equality. Okay, I really shouldn’t joke about that but there’s no difference from what I have heard if a man is a homosexual or a woman but I could be wrong. However, both seem to lose their human rights.

The further away you get from the epicenter the more most Muslims act like most Swedes. We Swedes kinda say we accept homosexuality but deep down a lot of people outside of the cities would still question it behind your back. However, in the epicenter it is not uncommon to hear both women and men talk about how Allah will punish the homosexuals. The radicals don’t even hide it because they are in fact PROUD of that opinion. They see themselves as the perfect Muslims. They say it clear in the open because they don’t fear anything and most people don’t even speak Swedish. If an outsider come into the area you have to have a translator to be able to hear what they’re saying right there clear in the open.

They even discuss daughters that don’t bleed during their wedding night and how ashamed families should be if that happens. I once heard that they “knew a guy who could surgically make their daughters bleed on the weeing night to uphold the family’s honor”. I mean these are to most normal people considered really radical thoughts but they seriously talk about it on a bench by the playground while their kids are on the swings 10 feet away.

The closer to the male teenagers you get the more they feel like they are messengers of Allah and they have the right to according to my friend’s translation “teach homosexuals to cure themselves and save those who aren’t infected”. A lot of radical women also take pride in a radical man so sadly the behavior is in some sense encouraged by the radicals in this wheel of a fucked up life.

It really is a different world near the epicenter. You can’t bring a camera or pretend you are showing something, doing a documentary or being suspicious because then they will show that you are not welcome. By show I mean they will break your shit. Me and my friends usually pretend we are passing through to get a pizza or something and that works most of the time. The most common thing though is that most people that we’d consider normal live in fear no matter the religion if you are close to the epicenter.

The police is increasing their presence but the problem is that near the epicenter they don’t believe in the police. Most don’t even believe in each other and are racing to be the best Muslims. The criminals dealing in drugs believe they are invincible and the victims and witnesses don’t believe in the police to protect them if they were to speak up.

Near the epicenter everything is ruled by fear and Allah happens to be a quite common tool to enforce their laws. A lot of times you hear talk about “being a proper Muslim”. That seems to be very important. It is like this race to be the best Muslims there ever was. So in some sense radicals gain ground by saying that they know the path of becoming the best Muslim and many in the younger generations look upon them with awe. It’s insane and the fact that this is so clear in the open and that homophobic ideals is talked about as common as the weather is crazy.

I’ve seen multiple newspapers in Sweden mention this now even before the angry foreigner did but to me and us living here it’s old news. It might be news for y’all living outside of these areas but ever since I moved to Gothenburg homophobia has always been there in Biskopsgården.

So when news come that teenagers are acting upon these things they have heard their entire life even by the playground it’s not a surprise. In fact I’m surprised we haven’t seen an attack on the pride festival yet. However, we also have to be realistic here. It’s not thousands that are throwing rocks, sending messages by burning cars and beating women. It’s a small percent but that doens’t make it any more right or acceptable but those actually acting the radical ideas out are very few. A lot more people share many of these radical ideas but they don’t physically act on them and break the law.

Even though the news mention the entire area of Biskopsgården it’s not as bad in the edges as the epicenter that I’ve explained here. It is livable for a male. When cars have been burning it is not like I fear for my life because even though it looks crazy on the news it’s a message and if the police show up the anger is only directed at the police due to the teenagers not believing in the police.

I have never seen a fat radicalized middle-aged Muslim male throw rocks at the police in Sweden. It is the radicalized teenagers and those engaged in criminal activity that believe they can carry out these acts. That’s the one time I see the radical Muslims and criminals join forces. To throw rocks at the police. #ComingTogether

I’d be afraid if I was (I put them in order as well to give you an idea how afraid you should be, feel free to combine them how you please but remember to double the fear for you first addition and triple for you second and so on):

1. A woman

2. A homosexual/Transexual

3. A feminist

4. A parent

5. A police

6. A nurse

7. A teacher

8. An Imam

9. A politician

10. A racist

Imagine being a homosexual woman with a kid being a police officer by day and an Imam by night. No, I’m just kidding. I know that’s ridiculous. That would never exist.

However do notice that by just being male you are a lot safer than our poor females that we contentiously let down in these areas. So even though you are scared from what you see on the news and you write an angry comment, you are blessed compared to the real oppressed in this country.”

Sex crimes in Sweden – Can you teach men not to rape?


A myth circulating the internet states that in Sweden the majority of rapes are assault rapes, and that this is due to immigration from muslim countries.

First things first: It is true that immigrants are overrepresented when it comes to rape. A study by the Crime Prevention Council (BRÅ) from 1996 showed they were 4 times more likely to be registered for the offense, and this primarily concerning immigrants from arab countries. A follow-up study from 2005 more or less confirmed the results of the previous one, and so have studies from Denmark and Norway.

However, both Swedish reports showed that the majority of immigrants (85-88%) weren’t registered for crimes what so ever. These numbers shouldn’t be used to smear an entire group of people, they should be used to highlight problematic tendencies so we can counteract crime. If you want a further analysis of these statistics you can watch the video I did on this topic, I go over it extensively there.

There is truth to the notion that immigrants rape more than Swedes. My personal estimation is that approximately half of all rapes in Sweden are conducted by the immigrant minority which makes up 20% of the population. It’s also true that immigrants are more likely to be convicted of crimes due to stereotypes and prejudice within the justice system, but I don’t think that’s enough to explain the overrepresentation.

However, it’s also problematic when statistics get misinterpreted and blown out of proportion to the point where it’s ridiculous. It’s blatantly untrue that 77% of rapists are muslims, and the majority of rapes in Sweden are not assault rapes.

It’s said that 63% of all rapes are committed by a total stranger. This is the result of a misunderstanding. The number is pertaining to “sexual crimes”, a label which includes things like rape, flashing, prostitution, trafficking, molestation, sexual coercion and child pornography.


In 63% of the sexcrimes, the perpetrator was completely unknown to the victim, in 25% of the cases the perpetrator was an acquaintance, and in 11% of the cases the perpetrator was a closely-related person.

34% of sexcrimes were considered severe enough to the point where they would qualify as attempted, or completed, sexual coercion or rape. The safety study also makes sure to clarify that sexcrimes which occur in the home, or by someone the person knows, are very likely to be underreported in a study such as this. At the same time, the reported number of sexcrimes where the perpetrator is someone you know is 36% – remember, 25% acquaintance and 11% closely-related.

Thus it is entirely possible that the remaining 2/3 of sexcrimes – which aren’t rapes – are primarily those where the perpetrator is unknown. Do also keep in mind that assault rapes and stranger-sexcrimes are not the same, one other report from BRÅ states that 12% of all reported rapes in Sweden are assault rapes. This is along the same line as public statements made by the police – it’s a minority, not a majority.

Page 10 in a different report about how rape is handled in the legal system states that, more than anything, the suspects are most often someone you have a relationship to – whether it’s someone close like a boyfriend, or someone more shallow like a classmate.

Add to this the fact that assault-rapes are more often reported than rapes by someone close to the person, for obvious reasons. It’s not very easy to report someone that you know as a figure in your day-to-day life, especially if the rapist is a respected member in the community. Some fear not being believed, and some simply don’t want to stir up controversy in their social circle. Imagine having to tell all your friends that the well-liked good-looking guy they all know raped you. Yeah, it’s not a fun thing to do.

Also, since the rape wasn’t brutal and violent the victim might try to rationalize that it wasn’t ”that bad” to save themselves from the traumatic experience. Here’s one account, another, yet another, and one by a man – They all display the same repeating pattern and the reaction is gender neutral. The man describes how he was drugged and raped at a party, and kept dating her afterwards – because the idea of being raped, as a man, was so horrible that he pushed it away and acted like it wasn’t a big deal.

Acquaintance rape victims also tend to blame themselves more, especially if alcohol was involved. Being attacked by a madman in a park sort of takes away the whole aspect of: ”Did I do something to lead him on?” So all in all, acquaintance rape victims are overall less likely to speak out, seek help and tell the authorities. All the talk about “women’s responsibility to avoid rape” probably keeps women from reporting as well.

The amount of unreported rapes, according to Sweden’s Crime Prevention Council, are 90% and it’s assumed that these are primarily acquaintance rapes. It is thus most likely that the saying about how most rapes are done by someone the victim knows isn’t at all a lie. The numbers indicate that it’s primarily “ordinary” men who rape, and not maniacs hiding in bushes.

People don’t understand that a typical rapist is a typical person

He’s an ordinary guy. Or at least he appears to be an ordinary guy. On the inside there is nothing ordinary about him, but on the surface there’s nothing differentiating him from other men when it comes to everyday appearance, behavior and social relations. It can be someone good-looking, or ugly, a loner, or a popular guy with many friends, single, or with a girlfriend, unemployed or in a prestigious profession.

So when someone drags up consent classes as a possible tactic towards rape, and you reply by saying ”Im a nice guy who would never do anything bad”, it really doesn’t mean anything. Most rapists are seemingly nice guys, and certainly see themselves in that light.

A study was done where nearly 1900 college students were asked four questions to determine if they had ever raped someone, or attempted to rape someone, but the study never used the word “rape”. And 120 men, meaning 6%, answered yes. A similar study which surveyed 86 male college students found similar results.

It turns out that as long as the word rape isn’t used, rapists will self-report. Because the word rape is taboo, and most typically rapists do not view what they did as rape.

If the immigrant minority which makes out 20% of Sweden’s population are responsible for half of all rapes, then that means Swedish rapists make out the other half. This is easy to forget when discussing rape, but it would be intellectually dishonest to ignore this and only focus on immigration.

Every so called “women’s issue” is also a man’s issue, because women raise us. They become our sisters, friends and girlfriends. I care about the rape issue because I care about the safety of women, not because I wanna use it as a cheap case against immigration.

In my video about immigrant rape statistics I concluded that there are several solutions to the problem, one being higher demands for assimilation, and the other being consent classes – both for newly arrived migrants as well as swedish youths (meaning both young boys and girls) as part of their general sex education.

This caused certain people to get upset and try dismissing me as a radical feminist. The usual objections took place, which is why I eventually decided to do a video on the topic of consent classes in general.

Everyone knows it’s bad to rape

Saying “everyone knows rape is bad” as a counter-argument is meaningless. The stereotypes of rape are so widespread in society people even become confused when you explain that someone can be raped by a boyfriend, and that violence doesn’t have to be present. They will downplay and say that it isn’t “rape-rape”, despite the fact that rape is simply defined as sex against your consent. The word “rape” is so ridden with misconceptions and taboo that not even the people who force others to have sex with them would use “rape” to describe what they’re doing.

The myths about rape, in practice, give rapists a social license to operate. They allow the perpetrator to hide in plain sight. To rape someone and still stay in the same social circle because she won’t tell anyone, since what happened doesn’t fit the sensationalist stereotype of sexcrime.

The unspoken pact to make excuses for what happened, look for mitigation or patch things over, so you can keep believing that what the people we know do to each other isn’t “rape-rape”. Since it wasn’t violent, and she didn’t fight and scream, it couldn’t be “rape-rape”. Making sure that you have it as comfortable as possible when you don’t have to ponder the possibility that a person you’re fond  of could be capable or something terrible.

The general publics ignorance about rape and what the average perpetrator looks like, is one of the reasons why the majority of sexual assault goes unreported. The stereotype of a rapist enables rape. This is especially true when it comes to child rape. When our society keeps the myth alive that it’s primarily the no-good muslim nigger or the dirty loser who doesn’t have any friends, that’s when a nice 41-year old teacher is given the leeway with a 14-year old victim.

How often don’t we hear the same thing repeated whenever someone gets caught for fucking kids? Interviews with the community saying ”oh we never would have thought that about him, he’s so nice, and shy, and tender. He’s so good with the children, they all like him. He’s not a black monster.”

This myth of the perpetrator makes it possible for the perpetrator to find his victim, and many times the parents just leave the prey over to directly to him. No parent would leave their child in the care of a dirty gypsy, yet they think it’s perfectly fine with the 41-year old nice good-looking teacher, or the enthusiastic camp leader. If you don’t know about the bad things in this world, they can creep up on you.

If men are a part of the problem then men can be a part of the solution. We need to talk about this and acknowledge the fact that rape is a much more complex issue than “those brown people are bad and it’s all about foreign culture, but when whites do it it’s just because they’re psychopaths”.

No, rapists aren’t necessarily psychopathic or suffering mental illness. You look at various studies done on incarcarated rapists and the number of psychopathic offenders vary from approximately 5% to 60% depending on the type of offender.


Also, the mere fact that the term ”non-psychopathic offender” is used in rape research and statistics should tell you something. One study also concluded that rapists actually have more empathy towards women in general than nonsexual offenders, and the same degree of empathy as nonsexual offenders towards rape victims at the hands of other men. The study concluded that rapists may suppress empathy primarily towards their own victim rather than suffer from a generalized empathy deficit.

In my video about consent education I mention a Swedish book by a crime journalist who interviewed sentenced rapists. In one of the chapters, the author met a woman who had a rapist in her social circle. He had been sentenced by the court for having raped and beaten his former girlfriend, yet numerous friends of hers had dated him throughout the years. They refused to accept that he had raped someone, because according to one of the women: ”It’s just impossible, because he’s good in bed.”

That’s how fucking retarded people are. They think that if someone is a rapist then they’re ALWAYS raping, 24/7, every single time they end up alone with a woman. They’re totally incapable of seeing nuance and understanding the psychological complexity of human beings.

It’s completely possible for a person to be capable of tenderness as well as horrible violence. People wear many different hats throughout their lives; Father, son, librarian, firefighter, caregiver, thoughtful, arrogant, foolish.  We can be any combination at any measure.  What I’m saying is that he could be a caring, funny husband while at the same time being a rapist.  Loving to most people, and cruel to others. Evil does not have a face.

Now, the problem with sex education is that it often only deals with the biological aspects of sex, and not the psychological and social ones. Talking about pregnancy and contraception is great, but don’t stop there. Go on to cover the importance of boundaries, the unrealistic expectations porn creates, how consent works, the different faces of sexual assault.

Teach students that nobody else is allowed to define your needs and what makes you feel unsafe. That’s what people need to talk more about, what healthy sexual relations look like.

And even if it might not reach through to those in the risk-zone of becoming a perpetrator, it would at least educate the general public on how it all works so we can create a society that’s more supporting of victims, instead of hounding the shit out of them because their experiences don’t suit your ignorant prejudice about sexual assault. Steubenville wasn’t unique to America, we’ve had cases like that here in Sweden as well.

The reason I think there’s something to consent education is that they tried it in Kenya, and it gave results. Acquaintance rape dropped by 20%, and the amount of boys thinking that miniskirts were inviting them to have sex dropped by 50%.

Now, Kenya is a backwards fucking country. If you can take a country that backwards and get them to stop raping after just a few classes, imagine what could happen in a more developed country like Sweden or America? I really don’t think we should underestimate what can happen when people get together and talk. It also shows that rape can be the result of skewed perspectives, and that’s something you can change.

But of course, just sex ed on it’s own isn’t going to solve everything. This is just one step of many that need to be taken to eliminate sexual assault. Another step is more scientific research.

The little research that’s been done indicates that what creates a rapist is not one single factor or experience, but a combination of different factors contribute to the development of predatory behavior in a young person. Like for example social inadequacy, various types of exclusion, low self-esteem, attachment issues, family dynamics, violence in the family, and lacking social competence. One study also demonstrated that rape is 2x more likely in societies where gender inequality is normalized.

These factors aren’t automatically going to turn someone into a rapist, but they’re commonly reoccuring. There needs to be more research done to reach more conclusive conclusions.

Last, but certainly not least

A frequent objection I see is: ”Consent classes is one of the biggest feminist insult to a man’s intelligence, especially to a western man.”

First of all, these classes should be for both men and women. Only focusing on men as perpetrators wouldn’t be very inclusive since men can be raped, whether by women or boyfriends, and women can be raped by women as well. Consent is a matter of person-to-person interaction, not gender.

Second of all, who gives a fuck if you think it’s an insult? Your feelings are not an argument. If you’re truly serious about stopping rape then you wouldn’t have a problem sitting in a classroom for 2 hours. If you really care about fixing the issue you wouldn’t have a problem thinking: ”I know this doesn’t apply to me personally but maybe other people aren’t as smart, and there’s no way to know for sure just by looking which person might be in the risk-zone, so I’ll just take one for the team here.”

The feelings of offended men are not worth more than the security of women, for the same reason that the feelings of offended muslims and christians aren’t worth more than freedom of speech. There are certain virtues we as a society need to uphold. And catering to the offended is not one of them.

The Refugee Children of Sweden



Does that person look 16 to you?


CRyYxORUEAAN61_.jpg large ARSE











Does this man look like 16 to you?











Clearly, everyone is racist.

Asylum seekers? More like luxury seekers.

Here’s yet another protest by refugees who claim that they’re being treated badly in Sweden: http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=86&artikel=6271692

In this case the food isn’t good enough, therefore they decided to put together signs and go stand in the town square to demand “respect”. Apparently it’s very disrespectful that the staff at the asylum house put together a menu with arab food for them, but aren’t cooking it the same way that they’re used to in their home country. One of the spokespersons for the protest said: “If you’re gonna make food then please – make it good.”

Apparently the food is such a big deal it warrants them holding up signs with the dead 3-year old kurdish boy Alan and text saying: “Don’t kill us again.”



The article says that there were also other complaints, but doesn’t specify what this is other than one of the other refugees saying that the food isn’t the main issue and that they “need to be treated as humans”.

In another article however, in a newspaper, the refugees claimed that the staff yells at them about all things possible. The owner, however, says that it’s simply not true but that they have to tell the refugees firmly if they catch them smoking in their rooms, something the staff has been clear isn’t allowed. She is also saddened by the criticsm because she feels it boils down to misunderstandings, and that they also do a lot for the refugees that they don’t have to do. For example, they give them Wi-Fi access in their rooms and TV’s with arabic channels.

One refugee also claimed that a staff member roughly grabbed her son in order to take away a toy which the little boy was intending on bringing to the restaurant, and that her son started screaming from the fear and pain. The owner, however, isn’t familiar with this incident. (Let’s be honest, kids will go apeshit whenever you try to take something from them.)



Honestly, I don’t know whether or not this protest is warranted. It’s entirely possible that privately owned asylum houses are corrupted and compromise the living standard of their housing in order to cheat themselves to more money, but it’s also possible that these refugees are just spoiled. They seem to be expecting better food than we give our elderly citizens, and it’s not the first time we’ve seen examples of luxury seekers around these here parts in Scandinavia.

In Finland, three Iraqi refugees posted a videoclip on Facebook saying: “We’re already considering returning to Iraq. We regret coming to Finland. We were wrong! We paid huge sums all for nothing. In Iraq you think everything is so extraordinary in Europe, that Europe is something divine. But it’s just completely ordinary here.”

Completely ordinary = life without bombs. What the hell, did he think they were going to Disneyland or something? If they had arrived there he probably would’ve complained about the rollercoasters too.

“The situation in Europe is tough. Sure, you’re safe here, but the toilets are dirty, there isn’t any clothes, food is expensive… The portions at receptioncentrals are small, they’re not even enough for children. Running from your country is terribly humiliating. You can’t get a job here. It was wrong to come here.”

They even go so far as to say: “Stay in your home country if you’re there, even if it means death or being hurt. At least you’re home in your country.”

At the same time you can read that around 40 refugees have decided to return to Iraq instead of waiting for asylum in Sweden, since the process can be very long. One really has to wonder: How great is the threat of death in your home country if you’re willing to return just because you might end up waiting in Sweden?

Numbers from Eurostat show that only 1 in 5 refugees are actually from Syria. Half a million migrants have arrived in Europe so far this year, with 156,000 coming in August alone. Rather than claiming asylum in the first safe EU country they reach, most head on toward wealthy northern countries.

Refugees who were interviewed by Danish television were asked why they didn’t stay in a peaceful country. The reply was that Denmark has too low welfare checks, so therefore they want to Sweden instead. When interviewed, a syrian refugee confirmed this image saying that the majority of people claiming to be refugees are simply trying to upgrade their living standard and exploit european welfare-societies. So did this one testify.

What conclusions are there to be drawn here? Is Sweden a shit country that can’t accept refugees properly, or are certain refugees just spoilt brats? One thing is for sure: During the Balkan crisis in the 90s, us Bosnian refugees didn’t complain about not being able to create music in the asylum house. An incident in December 2014 had 40-something refugees refuse to get off the bus in protest because the asylum house they were gonna live in “is too cold” and they didn’t like having to live 8 people in one room. They even went so far as to imply that the refugee camp in Lebanon they lived in for 2 years prior was better because “even though we had to sleep on the street we weren’t cold there”. They even planned a hunger strike because of their discontent.

Another paper reported how refugees were disappointed because they had to wait a whole week for a dental appointment. Here’s the kicker though: Asylum seekers in Sweden get free dental while waiting to have their asylum application treated. Swedish citizens do not get free dental. In fact, a 55-year old woman was forced to sell nearly all her possessions in order to afford dental work for a tumor in her jaw, and over the past 10 years she’s spent 250’000 SEK on dental work because of her condition.

And there are some places in Sweden where you have to wait 5 years for an appointment because the dental service is legally obliged to accept refugee children first and foremost. Swedish adults seeking service are told to visit private clinics instead. Keeping all this mind, perhaps the refugees shouldn’t bitch about having to wait a week considering that our public health sector is strained as it is.

Another bus protest occured because the refugees felt the rooms are too small and too far into the woods.

And recently 30 out of 100 refugees were so unhappy with being placed at a military camp in Åstön that they started marching by foot to Sundsvall to reach the train station there. Apparently it was unacceptable that it’s so cold, no stores and no communications nearby. (The weather at the time of the article varied between +4°C and +14°C. If you have a problem with cold, why do you come to a country where the winter temperature can be way below zero?)
They wanted to live in a city and didn’t appreciate ending up “in the middle of nowhere.” Now, tell me something. Does this look like unacceptable living standards for someone who’s fled the threat of death in the Middle East?


åston militärförläggning

It is clear that many asylum seekers who come to Sweden expect a very high standard of living, even at an asylum house. But can you blame them? Our politicians are just as deceptive as the human smugglers are. Sure, our politicians might not say that you will get a free house and a Swedish girlfriend if you come to Sweden – like the smugglers say – but they sure give off the illusion that everything is going to be fine. As if there’s housing and jobs for everyone.

Newsflash: There isn’t. The local migration authorities all basically say the same thing when these refugee protests take place: The system is strained. We’re taking in a lot of people, perhaps more than we can handle, so this is what we have to offer at the moment.

I mean freaking hell, in Jönköping we even had to move 40 refugees to another asylum house in order to fit more newly arrived refugees. So we’re basically moving refugees to fit refugees. And guess what? That turned into a protest too.

In another case two female volunteers who were handing out free clothes at an asylum house were beaten and threatened by an asylum seeker in his 40’s, because apparently “the residents have felt frustrated by not being able to pick clothes on their own. They’re upset that we’re telling them to write up what they need on a list, and that we’re organising and handing out the clothes according to that.” The boss also says that they’re “used to handling situations like this.”

Here’s another case. Seriously, look at the video in the article linked. They’re playing football in a grass field, they say that there is internet and ping-pong tables there, and that they came to Sweden because they heard that it’s the best country in the world: “The people are so nice and understand the meaning of human rights.”
And yet, they are disappointed. Why? Because they have “nothing to do all day”, and “we have been living here for 14 days and nobody from the Migration board has come to greet us and ask us how we’re doing, and if we need anything. That would have made it feel more motivated to come here. Knowing that someone takes an interest in us would have been enough.”

Basically they sound like a bad female stereotype that gets angry at you for not spending every waking moment catering to her mood swings and reading her mind when she’s pouty. You should KNOW what you did wrong, you bastard!

Furthermore, they go on to say that they live in a room that looks like a prison and complain about not being able to open the window. They literally say that it’s their “biggest problem” there, because when they close the door it gets “stuffy”. Their conclusion is that they regret coming to Sweden becuse they have “nothing” here. Seriously. Watch the video I linked, see for yourself what their room looks like, and then ask yourself: Is that a reasonable reaction for someone who has fled the threat of death?

This makes me think of the incident that I started this blogpost with. In that case, the asylum seekers got together and protested because they demand “respect”. Respect is a good word considering some of the incidents we have seen in Sweden over the past year or so. One simply has to wonder how these so called “refugees” are showing respect by coming to a country and shitting on everyone that’s helping them. Surely, demanding things from strangers as if you were a kid is the complete opposite of respect?

I would like you, dear reader, to perform a thought experiment: Try to imagine what country you would look down upon enough in order to be able to behave like those “refugees” are doing.

Personally, I don’t believe that they are all innocent victims like the media wants to portray. I am absolutely sure that some of them are real refugees. I remember that when I heard of one of the first bus protests there was a refugee woman who came with the same bus, she was interviewed by reporters and she said that she was very grateful for Sweden taking her in, and that those who were protesting should be ashamed of themselves, and that they didn’t represent everyone on that bus. I am sure of that, and that many are real refugees. However, I also suspect that many are simply luxury seekers.

Real refugees would be greatful to escape the threat of death. I came to Sweden as a war refugee when I was a child, and most of these people I’ve listed in this post make me fucking sick. They have no place in Sweden. They are not refugees. They are people who want to live their entire life on Swedish welfare.