The Truth Behind The Limits – What Minimum and Maximum Bets Are About


It was in 1654 that Antoine Chevalier de Mere asked Pascal why he usually lost when he bet even money that are double, 6 would show up at least once in 24 rolls of two dice. Pascal demonstrated that 24 rolls would be against the gambler, but 25 rolls would be slightly in his favor.

Pascal solved the question, and sent the solution to Pierre Fermat and Christian Huygens. The science known as Probability Theory was born. Up to then gambling odds were found by trial and error. Pascal, however, was able to calculate the odds of chance in a scientific way.

But if one knows the odds he can find the way to trick them. Since that time people also began developing the schemes to beat the system. A good deal of the systems is build around increasing each consecutive bet as anticipation of winning grows, known as martingale systems. So gambling establishment elaborated a simple method shut out a game transformation in to jump with bets, where a resource-sufficient player was practically “doomed” on winning. Maximum bet has its limits.

In any world casino each table, be that roulette, blackjack or poker, features signs clearly defining minimum and maximum rate of bets on a given table. A difference between them can be in 10, 30 or even in 100 times. But nowhere to you will be allowed to multiply your bets without restriction.

Please pay attention, that the very existence of maximum bet limits proves that a system, founded on bets augmentation principle, threatens the success of the casino. Take any table in regular or even on-line casino. For example the one, on which minimum bet is $25, and maximum one is $1000. Why do you think you are not allowed to bet more than $1000 at once? Do you believe they won’t have money to pay out? Or do they fear, that you will win and take your money home? But in VIP-halls of the same casino you can make a bet of $2000 or even $10000! And if you have specially requests you try negotiating with the administration to satisfy them. Most casinos have more than enough resources to meet any bet of yours.

The deal is about the correlation of maximum and minimum bets. So, in case the maximum is set at a $10000, the minimum bet will rarely be less than $250. The idea is to limit your double bets to certain number of times depending on the game. Usually you want be able to double more than 5 times. Otherwise your odd of winning become impermissible high.

In the Eighteenth century, Jacomo Casanova hit upon a method to win at gambling. Each time he lost, he would redouble his bet until he won. In letters he wrote to the friends, he discusses how his martingale system would guarantee his win every time. And mere two days later, he wrote a letter from prison. The scheme had failed — and series of losses overcame his funds, and he was now in debt. In 1755, after suffering ruinous gambling losses and participating in various illegitimate dealings, Casanova was denounced by the Venetian State Inquisitors and imprisoned beneath the lead roofs of the Venetian Ducal Palace, in place known as the “Leads”.

Gambling Poker Players – Bringing The Risk Factor To Light?
















How the Reverse Labouchere Roulette System Works

The Labouchere Roulette System is one of the famous roulette systems used by gamblers around the world to rake huge profit at the casino. The formula is designed to let gamblers exit the game with winning. One of disadvantages of the system is you may be dragged into a long loop if you face consecutive losses during your unlucky moment. Experts have modified the system and come out with a slight variation that becomes quite famous in its own right; the system is called The Reverse Labouchere Roulette System. Let’s explore how this system works:

Much like the original Labouchere Roulette System that uses a series of numbers in a line to decide how to bet following a win or a loss, where you eliminate the number in the line when you win and you add the number to the line when you lose, the reverse system does the opposite where you need to add number when you win and eliminate the number in the line when you lose.

Under the strategy of the Reverse Labouchere Roulette System, you have to decide the amount of money that might possible loss so that you never go overboard, while the strategy allow you to maximize the possible winnings which are only limited by reaching the maximum bet allowed on the roulette table. With these 2 facets combined, this betting system enables you to limit your losses while maximising your winnings.

Let’s use an example to see how the Reverse Roulette Labouchere System works:

1. First, decide your afforded possible losses per cycle, let’s assume the amount is $30.

2. Then, develop your Labouchere betting line. If you would like to play a less risky game, then develop a longer line, with smaller numbers such as 2-2-2-2-2-3-3-4-4-6; else if you would like to play a shorter, more aggressive game, simply make a shorter line with bigger numbers, such as 5-5-10-10.

3. Once you have developed the betting line, you can start bet on the game.

Let’s assume you are using the line of 2-2-2-2-2-3-3-4-4-6.

In our example, the Labouchere strategy requires you to add up the first and last numbers of the line that are 2 and 6, so your bet amount is $8 and bet on your favourite 50/50 bet at Roulette (Red/Black, Even/Odd and Hi/Lo).

If you win, simply add the number of the amount you just wagered, in our case is 8 to the end of the line and the line will become 2-2-2-2-2-3-3-4-4-6-8. On the other hand, if you lose, then cross out the number in the line that you combined to make your last bet, in our case is 2 & 6 and the line becomes X-2-2-2-2-3-3-4-4-X. Simply repeat the process until you have crossed out all the numbers or you have reached the table limit and you can’t make further bet.

If you have crossed all the numbers in the line, then your have reached the possible losing amount, in our case is $30. If the line is getting longer, meaning that the more money you have won.


The Reverse Labouchere Roulette System is a modified version of it original strategy that needs you to decide your possible losses upfront so that you won’t go overboard while it maximizes your winning potential that only limits by the maximum table limit.

101 Gambling Tips For the Avid Gambler


Critical Rules for Every Game




Money Management – General Guidelines











Money Management – Positive Progression Systems







Money Management – Negative Progression Systems





Playing Roulette










Playing Baccarat









Playing Blackjack









Playing Blackjack to Win – The Best Moves




52. Always double your bet when you’re dealt an 11.

Playing Blackjack to Lose – The Worst Moves




Playing Craps




Playing Craps to Win – The Best Bets






Playing Craps to Lose – The Worst Bets





Playing Texas Hold-‘Em Poker








Playing Slots – The Facts














Playing Slots – Strategies
















Understanding The Difference Between D’ Alembert And The Martingale Strategies

 If you have read about betting systems before, you will quickly recognize the similarities between the D’ Alembert and the Martingale strategies.

These roulette systems are designed to help players boost their winnings and give them a systematic plan to win back their losses by using only Even-Money bets.

There is, however, one very important distinction between these two, which is perhaps one reason why some casino players prefer using the D’ Alembert system.

The main drawback of the Martingale method is that you would need to play at roulette tables with no betting limits and have unlimited funds. This is because the strategy requires players to double the bet size following a losing bet.

The effect of doubling up every time you lose is that the stake size required to win back the money from a losing bet will grow exponentially with every losing bet.

This is where the D’ Alembert system is much more attractive.

In this betting system, whenever you lose a bet, you only need to increase your next bet by one unit, not twice a much. Plus every time there’ s a win, you will lower the next bet amount by one unit to lower the amount of money needed to recover should you lose the upcoming bet.

Let’ s use another example to compare these two betting systems. Let’ s assume we use $5 as our base bet (Martingale) or middle number of our sequence (D’ Alembert) with a total bankroll of $100.

Now, let’ s imagine that we lose four bets in a row. If we were using the Martingale strategy, we would have spent ¾ of our total bankroll by now ($75) and we would not be able to place the next wager because we have reached our bankroll limit of $100.

Using the D’ Alembert system, we would have spent only $26 of a total of $100 bankroll and we could afford to lose up to 8 bets in a row before hitting our bankroll limit.

This is what makes this system so attractive, but it comes at a cost.

The Problem with the D’ Alembert System

Despite what we have mentioned before, you must bear in mind that the D’ Alembert strategy is not perfect either. It’ s very important to mention that this strategy is based on a gambler’ s fallacy.

The problem with this strategy is that it assumes that players are more likely to win after losing a bet and they’ re more likely to lose after winning.

The problem with this is obvious; each spin has exactly the same odds of being red or black despite the result of the previous spin(s).

Regardless of this shortcoming, many players claim this method provides them with a systematic gambling system that allows them to achieve good results.

In conclusion, the D’ Alembert method represents an excellent opportunity to limit the risk of going bankrupt while allowing casino players to secure good profits.