Email to William Wragg (MP) 17/06/19

WRAGG, William <>,

Subject: ‘Human Rights’

Dear William (Wragg),

to continue.

At the Science and Technology Committee meeting on 10th June, Norman Lamb asked Steve Sampson, ”Should we do business with a company that’s complicit in human rights abuses?” The irony of his question was lost on the committee: Dr Martin Pall, ” It is my opinion that 5G will be vastly more dangerous than the things which preceded it. … you do not put out EMFs without doing safety testing. It is an atrocity to do that.”

Why does Dr Pall describe the deployment of 5G EMFs without safety testing as“an atrocity”? In a letter fo California Governor Jerry Brown, he wrote: ‘The industry keeps touting that their devices are within the safety guidelines set by the FCC? We know how the EMFs work in the body and that the industry propaganda has no science behind it. But what can we say about the 5G EMFs and what effects it will have on our bodies? 5G will be much more active in activating the VGCCs (voltage-gated calcium channels) and producing health impacts because of its rapid absorption by materials in the body, because of its very rapid pulsations and because of the huge number antennae they are planning to put up, at least 200 times the number of antennae from all current cell phone towers. What this means is that the impacts on the outer one to two inches of our bodies will be massive. Because of this we can expect humans to suffer from:

1. Very large increases in blindness from each of the four major causes of blindness: cataracts, macular degeneration, glaucoma and retinal detachment. Each of these involves excessive calcium levels in different parts of the eye and 3 of them also involve excessive voltage-gated calcium activity. I conclude that each of them is likely to be massively elevated by 5G. 

2. Large increases in hearing loss and tinnitus, leading in many cases to deafness. 

3. Very large increases in male infertility, as well as universal drops in sperm count. 

4. Very substantial numbers of melanoma skin cancer and leukemia and possibly other types of cancer. EMFs appear to be particularly active in causing cancer in children and consequently children are at special risk from 5G. 

5. Impacts on the peripheral nervous system leading to near universal neuropathic pain and peripheral neuropathy. 

6. Large increases in thyroid dysfunction, because of the location of the thyroid gland near the surface of the body. 

7. Impacts on the immune system cells, possibly leading to autoimmune diseases and other deficiencies. 

8. Impacts on the erythrocytes (red blood cells), leading to stacking of the erythrocytes into rouleaux (long chains) and also cell lysis, leading to very low oxygen in the tissues and lowered nutrients transport to the tissues. 

Because plants and animals are affected as much as we are, but much larger parts of them are highly exposed to the 5G radiation, the impacts on insects (including bees and other pollinators), birds, small mammals and almost all plants will be much more severe than the effects of humans.’

Link to the letter:

(Actually, the incidence of autoimmune conditions is already rapidly increasing… along with other illnesses and conditions. This is from a British Society for Immunology article:  Karen Addington, UK Chief Executive of JDRF, said: “This alarming and unexplained rise in autoimmune conditions among the UK population must be confronted. These conditions are causing pain, difficulty and lost opportunities in work and life.”)

The letter and emails that I, as a British citizen, have sent to members of the British Parliament have provided factual and verifiable information on the serious threat 5G poses to the safety, wellbeing and basic human rights of the British population. That officialdom has failed in its duty to provide this information, whether by design or by inadvertence, does beg questions but is not entirely relevant because various MPs, through non-official notification, have been made aware of the information, which upholds in its own right. The two most glaring issues are the complete absence of safety testing on 5G frequency biological effects together with the scientists’ appeals warning about the ‘potential serious health effects of 5G’ and also the inadequacy of the ‘unscientific’ ICNIRP guidelines to protect the public from the harmful effects of non-ionizing radiation. (These are the guidelines being used by the British Parliament to justify the roll-out of 5G.)

I first contacted you about 5G at the end of January 2018. Since then I have dedicated myself to a relentless pursuit of factual information on 5G technology. This is my assessment of the health effects: exposing people to 5G RF radiation is an insidious form of physical assault which will threaten the health and safety of the British public and violate their basic human rights. By its very nature, this technology has the capability to cause serious harm, especially cumulatively… and particularly to children.

In view of the gravity of this situation, please could you watch the following video, which was drawn to my attention on Saturday. Note that Frank Clegg was President of Microsoft Canada for fourteen years. If you are short of time, at least listen to Dr Anthony Miller’s and Dr Meg Sears’ informed perspectives… preferably listen to it all:

Please will you forward this email to your researcher. Also, please can you reply to my question in the previous email.

I’ll be forwarding this to the Science and Technology Committee members, the Health and Social Care Committee members and also to Dr Julian Lewis.

I’ll be contacting you further on some specifics.

Thank you.

Kindest regards,

Leave a Reply


You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: