Dangerous Priorities

Posted: Jun 04, 2010 5:02 PM
Dangerous Priorities

While the banking and mortgage industries imploded, attorneys at the Securities and Exchanges commission, tasked with oversight, indulged themselves on the job with hours of pornography. While the BP oil rig off the coast of Louisiana was badly in need of inspection, the federal agency charged with doing that waived the scrutiny and engaged in illegal drugs, sex and bribery.


Rush Limbaugh

“For far too long, many of our government’s hard-working, dedicated lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees have been denied equal access to the basic rights and benefits their colleagues enjoy,” wrote the President of the United States, Barak Obama.  “This kind of systemic inequality undermines the health, well-being, and security not just of our federal workforce, but also of their families and communities.”  Sounds good.  Who wants things to be unfair, but what exactly does he mean?

 First that more and more of our desperately needed tax dollars will be spent to promote Obama’s very clear intention to radically alter the definition of family.  While other positions he holds may be vague, his commitment to radical homosexual rights has been clear.   More money will be spent on child-care for children of same sex partners, more to provide them with employee assistance programs, more money for retired homosexual federal employees, more for said partners and their children in “evacuation payments,” extra pay allowances for certain locations, more for travel and relocation expenses, inclusion in the federal credit union, access to fitness facilities, long-term care insurance.  That’s all he can do without Congressional approval, but look for that to change soon through the Employment Non-Discrimination Act which will complete the full-fledged inclusion of same sex partners in all benefits.  We must spend more tax dollars to assure “fairness,” and we must do it….now.

Arguably more frightening is the following issued to a Federal Law Enforcement Agency just this week:  “The month of June is recognized as “Gay and Lesbian Awareness Month.  The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Advisory Committee was established to assist the agency in addressing employee diversity issues and concerns of sexual orientation in the workforce.  The LGBT Advisory Committee’s primary goals are to ensure equal employment opportunity, promote effective and equitable participation  and enhance career development opportunities for lesbian, gay , bisexual and transgender employees of the agency”   Attached to the proclamation is a quiz containing the following questions:

  1. The word “homosexual” was coined in which year?
  2. Which of the following empires was ruled for over two centuries by openly gay or bisexual emperors?
  3. In what century did homosexual acts become illegal in Western Europe?
  4. In what nation did the first large-scale gay rights movement begin?
  5. In what year was the first American soldier dismissed from the Armed Forces for being gay?
  6. Who was Martin Luther King Jr.’s openly gay advisor?

The quiz was followed by a press release from the ACLU quoting Christopher Anders, Senior Legislative Counsel, “This new policy is a very significant development…..the inclusion of gender identity in federal EEO policy marks the first time that gender identity discrimination has been explicitly banned from the federal workplace.  The policy is now on the federal government’s jobs web site as a link from more than 20,000 current federal job listings.”  And what exactly does that mean?

As new applicants flood the pool, there will be no “discrimination” allowed even in federal law enforcement against drag queens or lesbians dressing like men. 

It means that as federal law enforcement and other agencies attempt to protect us from radical Islam and domestic crime, they will be actively contending with a new dynamic in the workplace. As agents take a break from their desks for the bathroom, designations of “men” and “women” will no longer apply.  If a man in a dress or a woman who feels more like a man want to share a same-sex bathroom, no need to complain.  There are new protections in the federal workplace.

The Far Left have long been sexual anarchists.  The Weather Underground practiced “Smash Monogamy,” or group sex.   Homosexual writer Michelangelo Signorili in OUT Magazine in 1994 wrote that “gays should seize marriage not as a way of adhering to society’s moral codes but rather to debunk a myth and radically alter an archaic institution.”  He boasted that gay men have raised “open relationships” to an art form and might be able to push their heterosexual counterparts to do the same.

Andrew Sullivan, a homosexual journalist, wrote in his 1997 book, “Virtually Normal,” that homosexual relationships might be superior to marriage because homosexuals have a capacity to understand the need for “outside relationships.”

In 1997 the New York Times did an expose on “polyluv” where three or more people enter into relationship, reporting that some are even marrying with six plastic figures on a wedding cake.  The UN Convention on the Child demands “sexual freedom” for children.  Children have a right to have sex, says Judith Levine in her book “Harmful to Minors” with the forward written by former Surgeon General, Dr. Jocelyn Elders.

Barak Obama’s mentor, Communist Frank Marshall Davis was also a sexual anarchist. His exploits with his wife and a 13 year old girl among others are chronicled in his book “Sex Rebel.”

Sexual anarchy…chaos….on their way.  And our president is quite comfortable with it all.  In fact he is promoting it.  Don’t look for the borders or the economy or home sales, or the stock market or any natural disasters to be corrected any time soon.  Such dangerous priorities are being played out to a different kind of peril.