TY - JOUR T1 - Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks JF - Science Advances JO - Sci Adv DO - 10.1126/sciadv.1400005 VL - 1 IS - 1 SP - e1400005 AU - Clauset, Aaron AU - Arbesman, Samuel AU - Larremore, Daniel B. Y1 - 2015/02/01 UR - http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/1/e1400005.abstract N2 - The faculty job market plays a fundamental role in shaping research priorities, educational outcomes, and career trajectories among scientists and institutions. However, a quantitative understanding of faculty hiring as a system is lacking. Using a simple technique to extract the institutional prestige ranking that best explains an observed faculty hiring network—who hires whose graduates as faculty—we present and analyze comprehensive placement data on nearly 19,000 regular faculty in three disparate disciplines. Across disciplines, we find that faculty hiring follows a common and steeply hierarchical structure that reflects profound social inequality. Furthermore, doctoral prestige alone better predicts ultimate placement than a U.S. News &amp; World Report rank, women generally place worse than men, and increased institutional prestige leads to increased faculty production, better faculty placement, and a more influential position within the discipline. These results advance our ability to quantify the influence of prestige in academia and shed new light on the academic system. ER -