Donald Trump aims to carry on presidents’ tradition of proud gun ownership






16 Comments - what are your thoughts?

  • AKLady2015 says:

    ..We the People do not elect a President.
    We the People have never elected a President.
    We the People cannot elect President — the Constitution does not permit us to do so.
    Suggest you learn how your government actually functions.
    Start with the Electoral College.

  • bobnstuff says:
    So where does Trump stand on gun control? I find it hard to see Trump hunting in a three piece suit.

    1. snowyriver says:

      The second amendment has nothing to do with hunting, unless you are hunting terrorists. The second amendment is about the people protecting OUR CONSTITUTION.

      1. bobnstuff says:

        So is freedom of religion, freedom of the press, first amendment and freedom from search, fourth amendment both of which Trump has already said he was not in support of. It would seem that the only amendment Trump supports is the second and not always that one.

        1. Rodney Steward says:

          The 4th is being abused by the brown clown right now, Search and Seizure on American people and in most cases for no reason, or wrong house, but they won’t do this to the muslims like they should!! GO Trump!!

          1. bobnstuff says:

            Trump just praised the stop and search program. Either he doesn’t understand the constitution or he doesn’t care, you pick it, but Trump will make Obama look like he’s a straight constitutionalist.

          2. Rodney Steward says:

            There’s a difference between stop and search, and Search and Seizure bob, and nobody can make Obama look like anything that he hasn’t done for himself, A TOTAL LOSER AND FOOL!!

          3. NM Leon, Proud deplorable says:


            Terry v Ohio

            At least learn the basics before you start spreading bullschitte.

          4. bobnstuff says:



          5. NM Leon, Proud deplorable says:

            Yes, and who interprets the Constitution for legal purposes?

            Oh yeah, that would be the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). Terry v Ohio was an 8 to 1 SCOTUS decision.

            The NYC decision all you library idiots like to reference was by a fed judge that was so biased she was removed from the case for her bias, and was narrowly about the percentage of minority stop and frisks. The legal consensus is that the decision would have certainly been overturned had the current mayor appealed.

            Your abject, groveling, sniveling, apology is graciously accepted in advance.

    2. Rodney Steward says:

      That can go 2 ways, if Hellary sees something long with a hole in it, shes not going to shoot it, she’ll have other plans for that, if U know what I mean bobby!!

  • Daniel W says:


    1. Rodney Steward says:

      And even Feinstein packs, another it’s OK for me and not you, idiot!!

  • Robert inguaggiato says:

    And if you want to see that tradition continue you have to vote for Trump as Hillary is in favor of gun confiscation and deleting the 2nd amendment. Can’t turn the country over to foreign powers without first disarming it.

    1. AKLady2015 says:

      Why do you need to tell this lie?
      Why do you embarrass America this way?
      Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
      Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

      1. Helenlconnell2 says:

        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash340WebTeamGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!ik50f:….,……

Leave a Reply


Keep the Fake News Media in check.


View our full privacy policy.