网站导航     在线客服  
学生选择在小站备考：30天 255436名，今日申请8人    备考咨询 >>


更新时间：2018-01-09 19:33          

摘要：独立写作Independent Task的考试时间为30分钟，要求考生针对某个问题提出自己的观点，阐述自己的看法。通常一篇独立作文字数应不少于300词，字数没有上限。评分人会从考生如何展开论点、组织文章结构、并运用语言表达自己的观点。独立写作机经全部出自小站2010-2017托福题库，均为历年真题。

手机打开的二维码 扫一扫手机打开




托福独立写作 Independent Writing 共40题

第1题 来源：北美 话题分类：Education 属性：小范围核心预测

Some parents do not agree with the way teachers are teaching their children. Do you think that parents should express their disapproval to the teachers?
总观点： 支持向老师表达意见。 分论点1： 家长向老师表达意见是件正常的事。 论述：运用了自然延伸的论证方法，阐述了家长有权利关注自己孩子的成长并保护孩子不受伤害。 分论点2： 家长表达个人对于教育的想法是合理的。 论述： 运用了自然延伸和举例的论证方式，提到向老师提意见是件好事，并且以自己的经历为例进一步支持了分论点的论述。 让步段： 向老师提意见也会有一些问题存在。 论述： 运用了自然延伸的论证方式，说明了向老师提意见可能出现的问题。 结论： 家长应该和老师交流意见。
Teachers play an important role when children are young. However, nowadays more and more parents are concerned about whether their children can be well educated by teachers. Sometimes, they have different opinions about teacher’s teaching methods, but they wonder if it’s proper to tell the teacher directly. As for me, I think parents should express their disagreement. Firstly, It is normal that parents communicate with teachers about different opinions, whatever the teacher are fond of or not. No one would deny that sending their kids to school, parents have the right to pay close attention to the growth of their kids. There

第2题 来源：大陆 话题分类：Education 属性：小范围核心预测

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: All university students should take basic science courses regardless of their fields of study.
总观点：在校大学生不用选修基本科学课程 分论点1：大学应该是一个人们专修适合自己性格和特长专业的地方 论述：举反例论证若大学生一年都学科学课程所带来的弊端 分论点2：人们不能低估兴趣的影响，特别是在大学阶段 论述：从逼迫学生学习自己不敢兴趣课程的弊端和科学专业学生本身根本不用学习科学基础课程两个反面来进行论述 分论点3：额外的课程会收取额外的费用并且需要额外教学资源的投入 论述：给出两个合理的解决方案。学校可以选择出高价请新的教师或者抽调现有的部分教师来上课。 结论：大学本身应该更注重专业课程的提升而不是一些基础课程
As the so-called cradle of knowledge and talents, universities are often placed with too much expectation as if they can reshape a student into a person with omniscience after years of university study. Facts always go against the grain however. Then we can hear almost the same voice from the media, “we need a more comprehensive course structure to cover every spot of how the world functions”. Yet with a second thought, does the word really make sense, or does the society really expect university graduates to be in that way? Hopefully not. Therefore, I am fully against the idea of introducing basic science into university course system and advocate a more practical sense to view university education. First of all, a reasonable definition of university is a place where people can get professional knowledge in the field they choose. For the first day a student entering into the university, s/he embraces the dream to become a specialist in a specific area. With that goal rooted in mind, s/he selects major related courses, attends useful seminars or wo

第3题 来源：北美 话题分类：Activity 属性：小范围核心预测

Some people say that teachers and parents should decide what assignment or activities children should do after school. Others say that children should make these decisions on their own. Which view do you agree with and why?
总观点： 同意老师和家长决定孩子们的课后活动。 分论点1： 家长和老师经验丰富，能够给予孩子更有效的建议和帮助。 论述：运用举例的论证方法，以Bob为例，阐述了母亲对他的帮助，因而支持了分论点1。 分论点2： 能够预防孩子进行危险活动。 论述： 运用了自然延伸和举例的论证方式，提到孩子缺乏常识，很多时候无法做出正确的抉择，并以发生在自己家乡的一件事为例进一步支撑分论点2。 让步段： 孩子进行自己喜爱的活动会获得更多快乐，但是有家长和老师的帮助，他们会收获更多。 论述： 运用了举例论证方式，以表哥为例，阐述了他的老师对他的帮助。 结论： 让家长和老师来决定孩子的课后活动会更好。
Nowadays, some claim that kids should choose what to do after school by themselves because parents and teachers could not know what children really like. However, in my opinion, both teachers and parents should be responsible for children's mental and physical health, so they are entitled to make decisions about children’s after-class activities. To start with, parents and teachers have abundant life experience, so they can give some really useful and helpful suggestions to students, which can help them learn things more efficiently and effectively. After all, children need to be cultivated to form good habits. Take my little brother Bob for example. Bob is a boy who loves to read books a lot, and he regards author as his future career. However, what he does is only to read some novels for several months because he knows little about how to improve writing skills. Fortunately, his

第4题 来源：北美 话题分类：Society 属性：小范围核心预测

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People in the past are more interested in improving their neighborhood (the area where they live) than now.
总观点： 现在邻居之间的关系并不亲密。 分论点1：迫于学业和事业的压力，人们没有时间和精力来经营与他人的关系。 论述：运用了自然顺延和举例的论证方法，阐述了现代人忙于工作和学习，从而忽视了经营与邻居之间的关系。 分论点2： 现代人更愿意回到家后独处，远离喧嚣。 论述： 运用了自然顺延的论证方式，阐述了大多数人过着忙碌的生活，因此更愿意回家后放松自己。 分论点3： 现代社会，人与人之间缺乏信任。 论述：运用自然延伸的论证方式阐述了一些负面信息的散布使得人们更加谨慎，因此很难轻易去相信他人。 结论： 现代人不太热心于与邻居交往。
As science and technology advance, the connection among people is actually loosened. More young people prefer to play video games on computer rather than communicate with friends or families. The relationships between neighbors are not so closed. As far as I am concerned, the reasons can be explained as follows. To begin with, because of pressure at work or study, people have no time or energy to deal with the relationships with other. It is obvious that people rush to their work place or school in the early morning and come back late in the evening. They even have no time to relax or have a rest at weekends. Since they pay all their attention and conc


Someone thinks that scores should be the sum total of the scores of many assignment while others think that the scores should be the results of 1 or 2 exams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
总观点： 个人认为成绩应该由作业的成绩进行综合。 分论点1：现在的评分体系并不能客观地反映事实。 论述：运用了自然顺延的论证方法，阐述了如果有学生在一两次考试中失败就会失去进入理想大学的机会，然后以自己为例进行了展开。 分论点2： 现在的评分体系对培养孩子健康的学习习惯不利。 论述： 运用了自然顺延的方式，阐述了这样的评分体系就会造成一些学生花心思得高分而不是真正钻研和学习知识。 让步段： 承认现在的评分系统的一些优势。 论述： 但是，总体来说弊大于利。 结论： 支持将多次作业成绩进行综合的评分系统。
On contemporary society, scores serve as a decisive factor in one’s future. Thus, someone holds that the present marking system has its deficiency and appeals to the relevant people to perfect the Grading System. In my opinion, I agree with proposal for the following reasons. First and foremost, the present Grading System cannot objectively reflect the truth. It is not fair for someone who performs well but accidently fails to the 1 or 2 exams because they will lose the chance to be admitted to their desired universities. Take my experience as an example. I was the top student in my senior high school and got the high marks in every month exams but
沪公网安备 31010602002658号