• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905?

Extracts from this document...


Why was there a revolution in Russia in 1905? In 1905 the autocracy found itself confronted with a growing political opposition, peasant unrest and a dawning working class uprising. However, the military disaster of the Russo-Japanese war was needed, this is what shattered the Tzar's reputation and finally triggered revolution. One of the causes for the 1905 revolution came from a general unrest from those middle and lower classes in Russia. This is indeed comprehensible as a revolution comes from the people itself. These people can be devised according to the reason of their unrest. In total there were three main groups, the peasants, the industrials and the non-Russian populations. Russia was in 1815 part of the nations that defeated Napoleon and was considered as a great power. As time passed, Western countries were industrializing at a rapid pace and it soon succeeded to beat Russia in the war concerning the loss of territory of the Ottoman empire. ...read more.


Secondly having had a fast growing industry involving a lot of labour force, Russia's unemployment rose hugely when the growth ended suddenly because of the international financial crisis that occurred in 1899. Not only did the domestic industry create unemployment, the end of foreign investments also meant redundancy for a large part of the workers. Of course the bad harvest did nothing to help improve those conditions. Workers being uneducated and living in poor condition were easily convinced to strike by Marxist revolutionaries. The government being under pressure tried to drive away the workers discontent by introducing trade unions which were used against the government to organize large-scale strikes. Finally concerning the population's unrest, the non-Russian peoples suffered from the nationalistic policies that Alexander III and Nicholas II introduced. These policies obliged everyone to be able to understand Russian as it became the imposed language in the whole of Russia. ...read more.


Therefore they attacked Russia's naval base in Manchuria, Port Arthur, in 1904. After a series of events Japan eventually won and forced Russia to withdraw from Manchuria. In 1905 a group led by Father Gapon marched on the Winter Palace with a petition in their hand. About a thousand people were killed by the troops, this provoked a chain reaction of strikes across Russia. By July 1905 the Union of Liberals wanted an elected parliament, meanwhile strikes continue augmenting to the point were there was a general strike, peasant rebellions and rising among the non-Russian populations. In october the monarchy was dangerously threatened to disappear because of the creation of the St Petersburg Soviet which represented the interests of the workers. As stated in the introduction the outbreak of the revolution was only made possible by disastrous defeat in the Russo-Japanese war. However, the growing revolutionary sentiment would have finally peaked in revolution, as too many parts of society were agitated by the nobility's suppression upon the people as well as the strong political opposition. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text


Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate History essays

  1. Was the American Revolution Revolutionary?

    A particularly convincing part of Levine's argument is when he quotes John Adams saying "our struggle has loosened the bands of government everywhere" because it clearly shows how the American Revolution made a prominent change in the social classes in the colonies.


    In 1882, Kakhanov Commission set up to consider reform of administration at Volost and village levels (abolished in 1885). He also proposed to reconvene a zemsky sobor, and Assembly of the Land. Zemstva continued to carry out improvement in the village.

  1. How far would you agree that the February/March revolution that overthrew the Russian monarchy ...

    II renounce his position, the Tsar was forced to abdicate in favor of his brother the Grand Duke Michael Alexandrovich, who unexpectedly refused- thus marking the collapse of the dynasty of the Romanov on March 2. As the monarchy came to an abrupt end, the Provisional Government was left in

  2. French Revolution and the rise of Napoleon - revision notes

    - The concentration of the war was in German states. Silesia had been rested from Austria by Prussia in 1740's. Austria wanted to regain it. The king of Prussia then was Friedrich II (crashed the huge French and Austrian armies during the War).

  1. Italian Unification Revision Notes. Italian Politics in 1815

    Italy became unified from above, much to his disgust. He described the new Italian unified state as a 'dead corpse'. � Some may judge that Italy unified on Mazzinian lined could have been a more liberal, progressive and altogether preferable state to the one that did emerge.


    Took longer to defeat a declining Turkey in 1877 than it should have and Russia suffered defeats in the Russo-Japanese 1905-1904 and World War One. 2. People could still be substituted and officers remained highly aristocratic. 3. Still based on peasant conscription, illiteracy reduced the effectiveness of training.

  1. Answers to Questions on Russia and the 1905 Revolution

    Tensions with Japan led to a costly war, and the creation of the soviet of St. Petersburg also contributed to the Revolution?s initiation. 2c. The tsarist regime was able to survive during the revolution because there was nothing else to take its place.


    - No Palestinian Arab state had emerged after 1949. - Palestinian historians assert this was because Israel, supported by Western powers, prevented it. They claim that the British destroyed local Arab leadership through hostility and duplicity to the Arabs and complicity with the Zionists, therefore enabling the Zionists to expel the Palestinians from their own country.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work