So you say knowledge wants to be free?

If knowledge wants to be free, why do we work so hard keeping it trapped in scores and ratings whose meanings change depending on which questions were asked and who answered them?

Why don’t we liberate knowledge from its many prisons by embodying it in measurement systems that mean the same thing (within the range of uncertainty) no matter which questions on a topic are asked and no matter who answers them?

We routinely share knowledge quickly and easily when it’s about time, length, temperature, energy, mass, etc. Methods, theories, models, and tools developed over the last 90+ years show how we could be doing the same thing for literacy, health, functionality, environmental management, and every other major area of concern in the UN Sustainability Development Goals.

There’s a lot of talk among sustainability advocates about how urgent the need is for transformative efforts, investments, and technologies. It seems to me that sense of urgency will never be more than empty talk as long as we go on willfully ignoring the fact that we hold the keys to the chains that bind us.


Creative Commons License
Based on a work at livingcapitalmetrics.wordpress.com.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

One Response to “So you say knowledge wants to be free?”

  1. New Media Works Says:

    Reblogged this on Find News and commented:
    capital, measurement, metrology, economics, infrastructure, reinventing capitalism, impact investing, Communication, sustainability

Leave a Reply to New Media Works Cancel reply


WordPress.com Logo


Google photo


Twitter picture


Facebook photo


Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: