I started yesterday near 10:00 Am in Poland


today 4:00 Am I eliminated mirror
from the test ( directly laser on wall )

I'm using only wall's corner to brake light and see waves

step by step what I did today ( later movie will explain directions that I'm using in below txt )

laser give light from east to west direction
( horizontal line )

1 I see motion >>>>
2 I go to laser and make rotation 180 degree
3 I back to wall and I see the same direction waves >>>
4 I change line direction Vertical I can observe slower wave's motion from flore to celing

5 I confirmed the same with mirror

a ) mirror not change wave direction
b ) mirror make that wave Hz are lover
c)) mirror make waves more fat ( wide and high )

6 I go sleep
7 near 8 oclock AM ( today ) I tested different laser position

position 1 in my room I see waves motion >>>

I set laser 45 degree other direction and I register different wave motion >>>

8 I must eliminate only one problem Place
( in my home can exist some strange magnetic feild ) but I don't thinks

Sorry for this what I'm talking on movie ( it is 4 AM )

below Yotube confirm my above post



Miror and Zero mirror test

Michelson Morley in old experiment they Are using mirror
Mirror can change Hz of my signal in my test and can change also Size of beam in my home I have 5-6 meter long arm They use ? 10 meters ? Exist also other problem mirror is not so sensitive if we speak about Inerted Square Law ( please take a small flashlight in your hand and try give light more closer and more far to wall in your room - after this please do the same near huge mirror - on opposite wall mirror will show light and Your hand can be more far or more closer to mirror but on opposite wall You not register soo strong brightness's shift )

In Michelson Morley mirror is not good element it have to be eliminate To eavaluate motion with huge precision we must use more simply tool version .

Source -----R distance ------- screen

Directly and only one Arm tool eliminate oslso split problem
I feel that this problem also is very important but I can not confirm

To get more high precision test we can cross 4 sensors and use directly comparation ( brightness positions )

below picture is heavy to understand for somone who firt look on it but below links and more additional informations will explain more ( below methode use Inverted Square Law is much more precissionn than Michelson Morley ( line relations )

Why above test and post is important for physics

below paragraph is about Einstein not about Galilleo

" Galileo postulated his relativity hypothesis: any two observers moving at constant speed and direction with respect to one another will obtain the same results for all mechanical experiments (it is understood that the apparatuses they use for these experiments move with them).
This idea has a very important consequence: velocity is not absolute. This means that velocity can only be measured in reference to some object(s), and that the result of this measurment changes if we decide to measure the velocity with respect to a diferent refernce point(s). Imagine an observer traveling inside a windowless spaceship moving away from the sun at constant velocity. Galileo asserted that there are no mechanical experiments that can be made inside the rocket that will tell the occupants that the rocket is moving .
The question ``are we moving'' has no meaning unless we specify a reference frame (are we moving with respect to that star'' is meaningful). This fact, formulated in the 1600's remains very true today and is one of the cornerstones of Einstein's theories of relativity."

Exist many new unsolved problem ,,, it is too much for one person
here is many new actual and fresh info

8x slover Ytube movie confirmed that laser's line in my test rise step by step ( not like digital signal EXIST/ not EXIST )
above = that light is not at one time in many place and not have the same power in all place on my wall in my home. In my home distance is 5- 6 meter but for universe my wall = many observers that not have the same right to see the same beam

special very nice problem is if we compare constant acceleration
and constant velocity

more is here

BR Author
Maciej Marosz
Engineer and Inventor form Poland

Edited by newton (11/21/13 08:30 AM)