Civil Conversation Challenge for Teenagers, Forum 5: Voting and Democracy

From Sept. 22 to Sept. 28, our Student Opinion column might be dedicated to the problems we’ll be discussing in our Civil Conversation Challenge, however, as at all times, any teenager is invited to reply. We hope you’ll not solely put up your personal ideas, but additionally reply to the feedback of others.

What does voting imply to you, your loved ones and your group? What is at stake for you and the individuals you care about this election?

Are you fearful about voter suppression, voter fraud or misinformation forward of November’s vote? What concepts do you’ve for rethinking the best way we elect our nation’s leaders? Given the coronavirus pandemic, many individuals voting by mail for the primary time and a president who has repeatedly solid doubt on the method, how involved ought to we be concerning the 2020 election and its aftermath?

These are simply among the questions we hope you’ll discover on this Student Opinion discussion board, a part of our Civil Conversation Challenge.


Some background on the difficulty:

The proper to vote is the bedrock of American democracy. But in 2020, our electoral system has been referred to as into query by Republicans and Democrats alike — although they disagree about the place the issue lies. According to an article from NPR, it comes right down to a matter of precept:

Republicans usually tend to argue that casting a vote is a privilege of citizenship to be earned and safeguarded with restrictions and safety. …

Democrats usually tend to argue that voting is a proper and that the obstacles to casting a poll needs to be as little as sensible.

For instance, Republicans historically have supported tightening necessities to register and to vote, favoring measures like voter identification legal guidelines and, this yr, in-person voting. The motive for these safeguards, they are saying, is to fight what they declare to be “widespread voter fraud.” That declare, nonetheless, has been repeatedly debunked by analysis, which has discovered that, whereas voter fraud exists, it’s exceedingly uncommon.

Democrats, alternatively, are inclined to help the growth of the citizens and favor measures, resembling nationwide vote-by-mail, automated voter registration and making Election Day a nationwide vacation, that make casting a poll simpler and extra accessible. They see actions that Republicans say are supposed to forestall fraud — like purging voter rolls, limiting early voting and patrolling polling locations — as types of voter suppression that disproportionately preserve Black, Latino and Native individuals from voting.

This basic distinction in opinion on voting rights has come to a head this yr because the pandemic and a bunch of different considerations threaten this basis of our democracy — amongst them, ongoing interference from Russia, China and Iran; widespread on-line misinformation; partisan gerrymandering; the equity of the Electoral College; and questions on whether or not President Trump, who has frequently sown mistrust within the election, will contest the end result or decide to a peaceable switch of energy ought to he lose.

What has resulted is that Americans in the present day have diminished religion within the election course of and plenty of are already fearful concerning the legitimacy of the vote in November.

How involved do you assume we must always we be concerning the integrity of the 2020 election? What issues fear you most? What needs to be executed to handle them?

Where to study extra:

Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s place on voter fraud and suppression, mail-in voting, overseas interference and the Electoral College

President Trump’s place on voter fraud, mail-in voting, overseas interference and the Electoral College

ProCon’s 2020 points web page, which places the candidates’ positions aspect by aspect

An NPR article from June, “Voting and Elections Divide Republicans and Democrats Like Little Else. Here’s Why”

A New York Times Opinion essay from June, “How Worried Should You Be About the 2020 Election?”

A Times article from August, “The Voting Will End Nov. three. The Legal Battle Probably Won’t.”

A brand new Times video sequence, which started Sept. 27 and can have a brand new installment every week, “Stressed Election”

A Learning Network lesson plan, “The Final Vote for President: Learning About the Electoral College”

Possible questions to handle:

Why does this matter curiosity you? How have your experiences formed your opinions? What questions or considerations does this matter elevate for you? Consider, additionally, your views on voting: What does voting imply to you, your loved ones and your group? Are you and your loved ones politically energetic or civically engaged? Have you seen proof that voting has labored for the individuals in your group? What is at stake for you and the individuals you care about this election?

Is voting a privilege or a proper? Do you see voting as Republicans are inclined to see it — a privilege of citizenship that needs to be protected by restrictions and safety — or like Democrats — a proper to which the obstacles needs to be as little as attainable? Why?

To what extent is voter suppression an issue within the United States? In the years after Republicans swept state and congressional elections in 2010, legislatures in 25 states — all however a handful of them dominated by the get together — enacted legal guidelines that made it more durable to register and vote, from imposing ID necessities and curbing voter registration drives to rolling again early voting durations. Republicans have mentioned these measures are mandatory to stop fraudulent voting, although proof suggests at the very least in some circumstances they’re leveraging these legal guidelines for political acquire. Democrats and civil rights activists have mentioned these actions quantity to voter suppression and goal individuals of coloration who’ve a protracted historical past of disenfranchisement in these states. What do you consider these legal guidelines? Are they mandatory to make sure secure and safe elections? Or do they infringe on individuals’s voting rights? Do you assume racial minorities not face obstacles to voting, as they’ve traditionally within the United States? Or are extra safeguards wanted to guard the rights of individuals of coloration, school college students and different voters?

Should all voters have the choice to vote by mail? Before this yr, solely seven states allowed each registered voter to solid their ballots by mail. Now, due to the pandemic, many extra states will enable residents to vote by mail. Democrats have pushed to develop vote-by-mail and make it extra accessible. Mr. Trump and a few Republicans have resisted, saying the apply favors Democrats and is ripe for voter fraud, although there is no such thing as a proof to help both of those claims. Do you assume we must always embrace mail-in voting for this and future elections? Why or why not? In your opinion, does blocking entry to or casting doubt on mail-in voting deny voting rights to these Americans who’re at excessive danger for Covid-19 or who in any other case face obstacles to in-person voting?

How fearful ought to we be about interference in our elections? American intelligence officers have confirmed that Russia, which was discovered to have interfered within the 2016 election, is actively pursuing a disinformation marketing campaign aimed toward elevating Mr. Trump’s re-election probabilities. The Trump administration has downplayed, objected to and attacked these findings, whereas Democrats have expressed alarm and pushed intelligence officers to launch extra data to the general public. How fearful ought to we be about interference by Russia, and different international locations, in our elections? What duty does the federal government should curb overseas affect? To what extent do social media corporations, on which these disinformation campaigns are largely going down, have a task? What duty do voters should parse out the true information from the false or deceptive?

Should we abolish the Electoral College? Twice prior to now 20 years, in 2000 and 2016, the Electoral College has resulted in a candidate profitable the presidency with out profitable the vast majority of votes. And it might occur once more this yr. Calls to do away with this method and as an alternative elect presidents by standard vote are gaining steam, with some individuals arguing that the Electoral College is antiquated, undemocratic and a legacy of white supremacy. Others say it’s essential to protect our constitutional system and create incentives for candidates to marketing campaign in all areas of the nation. What do you assume? Is the Electoral College a authentic, truthful and related approach to decide on the president in 2020? Or ought to we give you a brand new system? What ought to or not it’s?

Should extra individuals be capable to vote? The citizens has regularly expanded to incorporate an increasing number of individuals since America’s founding: African-American males gained the best to vote in 1870 with the 15th Amendment; ladies in 1920 with the 19th Amendment; and 18-year-olds in 1971 with the 26th Amendment. And there are actions in the present day which are working to develop voting rights. This election cycle, for instance, there was a push to revive voting rights to individuals who have served sentences for felony convictions; Mr. Biden has voiced his help for the measure, whereas Republicans have tried to restrict it. Do you assume individuals with legal convictions ought to be capable to vote? What about 16-year-olds? Or anybody else who presently can not vote in U.S. elections? Why or why not?

How involved do you assume we must always we be concerning the integrity of the 2020 election? Experts say this election has the potential to be “explosive.” In “The Voting Will End Nov. three. The Legal Battle Probably Won’t,” Times journalists write:

[The clash over voting rights] has been vastly difficult this yr by the problem of holding a nationwide election in the course of a lethal pandemic, with a better reliance on mail-in voting that might lengthen the counting in a approach that turns Election Day into Election Week or Election Month. And the ambiance has been infected by a president who’s already utilizing phrases like “coup,” “fraud” and “corrupt” to delegitimize the vote even earlier than it occurs.

The battle is enjoying out on two tracks: defining the principles about how the voting will happen, and making ready for fights over how the votes needs to be counted and contesting the end result.

“The massive electoral disaster arises from the prospect of a whole bunch of hundreds of ballots not being counted in decisive states till per week after the election or extra,” mentioned Richard H. Pildes, a constitutional scholar at New York University School of Law.

If the candidate who seems forward on election night time finally ends up dropping in a while, he mentioned, it’ll gas suspicion, conspiracy theories and polarization. “I’ve little question the scenario might be explosive,” he mentioned.

And on Sept. 24, Mr. Trump refused to decide to a peaceable switch of energy, ought to he lose the election. The Times explains:

Mr. Trump’s refusal — or lack of ability — to endorse maybe essentially the most basic tenet of American democracy, as any president in reminiscence absolutely would have, was the most recent occasion wherein he has solid grave uncertainty across the November election and its aftermath. Democrats are rising more and more alarmed as Mr. Trump repeatedly questions the integrity of the vote and means that he won’t settle for the outcomes if he loses.

The Trump and Biden campaigns are stocking up on attorneys forward of election night time, with Democrats even making ready for a “doomsday situation,” that features Mr. Trump claiming untimely victory and arguing the election was “rigged.” How fearful are you about November’s vote? What issues in our voting and election methods concern you most? What do you assume needs to be executed to handle them?

What extra would you prefer to say? Start a dialog, or be part of one, by posting a remark.

Students 13 and older within the United States and the United Kingdom, and 16 and older elsewhere, are invited to remark. All feedback are moderated by the Learning Network employees, however please remember the fact that as soon as your remark is accepted, it will likely be made public.