

















Comments     Threshold


Crash Fatalities
By Reclaimer77 on 5/25/2011 9:56:03 AM , Rating: 2
According to their own numbers crash fatalities and accident rates have been steadily on the decline, year after year. Why exactly do we need these black boxes now?

RE: Crash Fatalities
By Skywalker123 on 5/25/2011 11:26:20 AM , Rating: 2
"Because if it saves the life of just ONE child it will be well worth it!" blubbers the liberally retarded activist.

RE: Crash Fatalities
By M4gery on 5/25/2011 3:55:52 PM , Rating: 2

Ugh, no it wont. There are already too goddamned many people. We need some form of population control.

RE: Crash Fatalities
By JakLee on 5/25/2011 4:39:20 PM , Rating: 2
Well if that is how you truly feel, off yourself - there are plenty of people who feel that way & are only looking for a leader - you will be famous!

RE: Crash Fatalities
By YashBudini on 5/25/2011 5:58:58 PM , Rating: 3

Whom here are you quoting? Oh, nobody said it, you made it up to support your hatefilled stance. That's certainly justification enough.

How does a device that records an accident save anyone? It's not a preventative device. And it's not here at all in your favor, the only reason these devices will be present is the same reason you have TPMS, to limit or eliminate corporate liability. Nobody's interested in helping you or anyone else. Your bleeding heart scenario either doesn't exist or it's the sham you fell for.

At casinos they video record people entering the site because many claimed they would being hurt by the automatic doors. The video recordings eliminated the liars. Then one day a person really was slammed by an automatic door. When police asked for the video they had a damn hard time getting hold of it. It's release had to be mandated by the courts.

If you think such recordings are going to show a potentially fatal defect in a car that either won't happen at all or will happen with another law.

Luke, your force is way off, go practice some more.

RE: Crash Fatalities
By tng on 5/26/2011 11:01:05 AM , Rating: 2
I think you missed it Yash, that was not the real reason they would want to put them on everything that moves, just the crap get sympathy reason to get acceptance from all of the people out there.

Those would be the same people who really thought that this administration would really bring change over the last one.

RE: Crash Fatalities
By YashBudini on 5/26/2011 1:24:20 PM , Rating: 2

The scope of my response was limited to the hate monger's remarks. Very un-Luke-like.

The fact that we got Bush 3 for president comes as no suprise to me. Prior to the election dem optimism turned into euphoria, that was the red flag.

RE: Crash Fatalities
By tng on 5/26/2011 2:15:03 PM , Rating: 2
It was more than just euphoria, there were people out there that would pass out when he would walk onto the stage at an election rally!

You are right, at that point I lost hope. Bush 3.....Can I use that?

RE: Crash Fatalities
By YashBudini on 5/26/2011 5:23:10 PM , Rating: 2
Bush 3.....Can I use that?

No charge, but if you make a movie out of it I'll see you in court.

RE: Crash Fatalities

RE: Crash Fatalities
By Etsp on 5/25/2011 2:58:43 PM , Rating: 2
We've always needed the blackboxes, we simply didn't have the tech to enforce having them.

I personally would have no problem with them as long as they didn't store data for more than 24 hours, and do not transmit this data to anything. Given those conditions, I wouldn't care what they recorded. The only exception to the data storage and transmission limit would be for accidents.

Then the data should be available to be extracted only for the purpose of determining cause of the accident, and determining how effective the safety features of the car were for that given accident.

