already a subscriber? Register me
Subscribe now See my options
Proof and Hearsay

Crime, courts and legal issues in Milwaukee and throughout Wisconsin

  • We reserve the right to close commenting on specific stories.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50
  1. Two years? See how the legal beagles support one another? He should have been permanently barred from practicing law. This is not his first violation, so it's a known fact that he has no respect for the law. He should have also gotten a longer prison sentence.
    Judges and most politicians have law degrees, so they are not to be trusted to handle the cases of corrupt lawyers!
  2. two whole years??? Wow..... why even bother.
  3. When convicted, like pretty young blond women usually get light sentences. Not because lawyers are admired, but because they are insiders and the system is kinder to them. I knew Stern when he was younger and practicing. He seemed OK then and not too bent, he must later have been down financially to steal so stupidly.
  4. He should have his law license rvoked for life. He is a convicted criminal who has
    abused his position as an officer of the court and can't be trusted. Mr. Stern is a dispicable excuse for a human being.
  5. Two YEARS??!! And one of them, he's in PRISON??!! LOLOLOL! Wow--the Wisconsin Supreme Court plays hardball!
  6. Oath? What freakin' oath?
  7. If he needs a job for the next couple years I'm sure he could be appointed to something in Madison. He just needs to attach a campaign contribution to his resume.



Supreme Court Tracker


See all Journal Sentinel Twitter feeds