On Mon, 3 Aug 1998, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > PS: Should we post it on a regular basis, say once per month? Definitely not. This is especially due to the meaninglessness of this particular statistic. Not that there aren't others that more more meaningless. Ben's revelation that I've only checked out the Apache sources five times in the last month was particuarly useless :) And the CHANGES file, as we all know, is a particuarly bad indication of when anything happened. It's missing large chunks of data, especially between major releases (1.1, 1.2 and 1.3, for example). According to the CHANGES file, for example, we never actually made a Win32 port. It just sort of appeared. And it would have only counted once, at any rate, although the number of lines of code attached to such an entry would probably have given Ambarish, Ben and I top billing in the 1.3a1 category if it were done by lines of code changed. (And I *know* I've made more than 27 contributions, by the way. But most of them came in sections of the CHANGES file that aren't there any more, or never were. Minor things like mod_actions, handlers, keep-alive support, , name-based virtual hosts, HTTP/1.1 compliance, , chunks of the Win32 port, etc...) -- Alexei Kosut Stanford University, Class of 2001 * Apache *