Beefy Boxes and Bandwidth Generously Provided by pair Networks
laziness, impatience, and hubris

Comment on

Actually, I merely rephrased that. I can't recall whom I cite it from and the exact word per word.
Yes I am aware. That's just what I exactly meant by "nested", I can have Foo::Bar and Foo::Bar::Baz instead of Foo_Bar and Foo_Bar_Baz (no nested here). I didn't indicate anything between 'nested package name' and 'package relationship'. It's clear that Foo_Bar or Foo_Bar_Baz or CGI_Application_Plugin_Authentication_Driver_DBI are all under the same namespace, while Bar is under Foo and Baz is under Foo::Bar. But I do take advantage that I can arrange some classes/packages stucture within a suite of modules.
Thanks for the correction :-) That was not a typo, it was a mispell.
"Statement modifiers."
Thank you, it's indeed in perlsyn.
At least based on my limited knowledge about other languages. I consider it as Perl's strength in providing high-granular variable scoping: file, package, block, inner-block, inner-inner-block, etc.


In reply to Re^5: What's wrong with Perl 6? by naikonta
in thread What's wrong with Perl 6? by duff

and:  <code> code here </code>

  • Please read these before you post! —
            For:     Use:
    & &amp;
    < &lt;
    > &gt;
    [ &#91;
    ] &#93;
  • Log In?

    What's my password?
    Create A New User
    and the web crawler heard nothing...

    How do I use this? | Other CB clients
    Other Users?
    Others chanting in the Monastery: (5)
    As of 2014-12-29 02:28 GMT
    Find Nodes?
      Voting Booth?

      Is guessing a good strategy for surviving in the IT business?

      Results (184 votes), past polls