
Permalink for comment 545756
RE[7]: Jury qualifications?
by Alfman on Tue 18th Dec 2012 20:43 UTC in reply to "RE[6]: Jury qualifications?"
Member since:


For god's sake man, the post we're talking about is right here!

Your not talking about outside knowledge, your talking about following instructions. The judge concedes very clearly that any erroneous statements by Hogan during deliberations would have to be barred as evidence. She's taking a legal shortcut and claiming it doesn't matter whether the wrong instructions were following during deliberations because it's inadmissible as evidence anyways.

Therefor THE COURT DID ***NOT*** DISAGREE THAT HOGAN DISOBEYED THE COURT'S INSTRUCTIONS. The court chose to dismiss any such evidence without further consideration.

I'm going to save us both a lot of trouble here and just agree to disagree right now since I feel this isn't going to go anywhere.

Edited 2012-12-18 20:58 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2