strongbow2 Wrote:
Oct 13, 2013 10:17 AM
If nonessential government workers currently furloughed and given back pay, but permanently laid off as companies customarily do when they downsize how much money would that save us? I firmly believe that a 30 percent reduction in the federal workforce would cause the government to re-evaluate those activities that are business critical from those that are more of a luxury and redistribute the work and cancel the unnecessary. I've seen this happen first hand at a major corporation when I worked there. First to go would be the NPS with those assets under their control handed over to the states and local governments to run on a for profit basis.