> To me, this justifies renaming the release from JDO 2.3 to JDO 3.0. One minor issue with the rename is that the Maven repo has the artifact as "jdo2-api". Do we go forward with this same name and just set the version to 3.0, or does it become an artifact of "jdo-api" ? -- Andy DataNucleus (http://www.datanucleus.org)